License: arXiv.org perpetual non-exclusive license
arXiv:2402.13282v1 [astro-ph.IM] 19 Feb 2024
\authormark

Rattenbury et al.

Update on the German and Australasian Optical Ground Station Networks

Nicholas J. Rattenbury    Joseph Ashby    Francis Bennet    Marcus Birch    John E. Cater    Kate Ferguson    Dirk Giggenbach    Ken Grant    Andreas Knopp    Marcus T. Knopp    Ed Kruzins    Andrew Lambert    Kerry Mudge    Catherine Qualtrough    Samuele Raffa    Jonas Rittershofer    Mikhael Sayat    Sascha Schediwy    Robert T. Schwarz    Matthew Sellars    Oliver Thearle    Tony Travouillon    Kevin Walker    Shane Walsh    Stephen Weddell \orgdivDepartment of Physics, \orgnameThe University of Auckland, \orgaddress\stateAuckland, \countryNew Zealand \orgdivCollege of Science, \orgnameAustralian National University, \orgaddress\stateACT, \countryAustralia \orgdivDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, \orgnameUniversity of Canterbury, \orgaddress\stateChristchurch, \countryNew Zealand \orgdivANU Institute for Space, \orgnameAustralian National University, \orgaddress\stateACT, \countryAustralia \orgdivInstitute of Communications and Navigation, \orgnameGerman Aerospace Center (DLR e.V.), \orgaddress\stateWessling, \country Germany \orgdivDefence Science and Technology Group, \orgnameEdinburgh, \orgaddress\stateSA, \countryAustralia \orgdivSpace Research Center, \orgnameUniversity of the Bundeswehr Munich, \orgaddress\stateNeubiberg, \countryGermany \orgdivResponsive Space Cluster Competence Center (RSC3), \orgnameGerman Aerospace Center (DLR e. V.), \orgaddress\stateWessling, \countryGermany \orgdivCanberra Space, \orgnameUniversity of New South Wales, \orgaddress\stateNSW, \countryAustralia \orgdivCommonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation, \orgnameSydney, \orgaddress\stateNSW, \countryAustralia \orgdivSchool of Engineering and Information Technology, \orgnameUniversity of New South Wales, \orgaddress\stateACT, \countryAustralia \orgdivInternational Centre for Radio Astronomy Research, \orgnameThe University of Western Australia, \orgaddress\stateWA, \countryAustralia \orgdivResearch School of Physics, \orgnameAustralian National University, \orgaddress\stateACT, \countryAustralia \orgdivDepartment of Electrical Engineering, \orgnameUniversity of Canterbury, \orgaddress\stateChristchurch, \countryNew Zealand    N.J. Rattenbury
(26 April 2016; 6 June 2016; 6 June 2016)
Abstract

[Abstract] Networks of ground stations designed to transmit and receive at optical wavelengths through the atmosphere offer an opportunity to provide on-demand, high-bandwidth, secure communications with spacecraft in Earth orbit and beyond. This work describes the operation and activities of current Free Space Optical Communication (FSOC) ground stations in Germany and Australasia. In Germany, FSOC facilities are located at the Oberpfaffenhofen campus of the Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (German Aerospace Center, DLR), the Laser-Bodenstation in Trauen (Responsive Space Cluster Competence Center, DLR), and the Research Center Space of the University of the Bundeswehr Munich in Neubiberg. The DLR also operates a ground station in Almeria, Spain as part of the European Optical Nucleus Network. The Australasian Optical Ground Station Network (AOGSN) is a proposed network of 0.5 – 0.7 mmeter\mathrm{m}roman_m class optical telescopes located across Australia and New Zealand. The development and progress for each node of the AOGSN is reported, along with optimisation of future site locations based on cloud cover analysis.

\jnlcitation\cname

, (\cyear2023), \ctitleUpdate on the German and Australasian Optical Ground Station Networks, \cjournalIJSCN, \cvolTBD.

keywords:
Free-space Optical Communications, Ground Station Network
articletype: Article

1 Introduction

Free space optical communication (FSOC) is a technique that uses lasers to communicate information. These lasers are typically in the infra-red band and communication protocols can be modulated on properties such as laser amplitude or phase. Laser light offers substantial advantages for inter-satellite and Earth-satellite communications over conventional radio frequency (RF) communications 1, 2. Channel bandwidths available using FSOC are higher than those using conventional radio frequencies 3, and the transmitter and receiver hardware is smaller, lighter and more efficient 4, 5 while also avoiding spectrum licensing. These features are attractive for the designers of spacecraft, where the size, weight and power budgets are highly constrained. Demand for higher quantities of data from space is increasing for conventional activities such as Earth observation and global telecommunications 6. Ever higher rates of data will be required as crewed space missions start to take place in cislunar space, on the lunar surface and further afield to Mars 7, 8. FSOC also offers a communication channel that can be made robust against eavesdropping using quantum processes 9, 10, 11, 12. This is a feature available with FSOC that is of particular interest to sectors where security is paramount, including government, defence and global banking.

Further experimentation and technology development is required to enable FSOC to achieve these features for the international space-based communication market. This is particularly important for high-performance systems requiring advanced techniques such as coherent communications and adaptive optics. These research and development activities will be accelerated by the development of research-grade optical ground station terminals.

An FSOC ground station requires a cloud-free line of sight between it and a client space asset to establish a communications channel. Even in sites with the highest fractions of cloud-free skies, there will be periods that an FSOC terminal at such a site will be obscured by cloud, or unavailable for operations for other reasons such as the need to perform maintenance. A network of FSOC ground stations provides a mitigation against these situations encountered by a single FSOC ground station. Such a network would comprise a number of FSOC ground station nodes, where each node is sufficiently distant from the others so that the weather conditions at that node are as uncorrelated as possible with those experienced at the other nodes.

Cloud coverage is the principal constraint on the performance of an optical ground station (OGS) network, and predicting network performance has been the subject of a significant quantity of literature. The DLR has developed a model for network performance estimation with pre-selected sites around Europe and a means of diversity estimation using spatial correlations of cloud cover 13. Assuming site independence or empirical outage measurements, large European networks are proposed with reliability of 98% to 99%. The ONUBLA software was also proposed as means to use these methods via software, collating and analysing cloud fraction for any proposed OGS network, and predicts the performance of the network 14, 15, 16.

Diversity and reliability for an Australasian Optical Ground Station Network (AOGSN) was further explored in a recent publication, which also proposes a complete analytical solution to network diversity for spatially correlated OGS which did not exist in previous attempts 17. A base AOGSN with three nodes (N=3𝑁3N=3italic_N = 3) was found to have a 6.4% outage probability and a larger AOGSN with eight nodes (N=8𝑁8N=8italic_N = 8) had an 0.02% outage probability. A spatially-resolved means of network optimisation, i.e., without pre-selecting locations, was also shown. Australia and New Zealand were generally shown to be excellent locations for an OGS network due to the low cloud fraction and large geographic size which offers minimal site-to-site correlation and broad coverage 17.

In this work an overview of the establishment of optical ground stations in Europe and Australasia is presented, as well as a report on the optimisation of node placement to most efficiently expand on existing infrastructure with site optimisation in New Zealand.

2 German FSOC Ground Stations and Network

Several research institutes in Germany have established, or are establishing FSOC ground stations, and programs of FSOC research. The German Aerospace Centre (DLR), is leading research on the definition of FSOC standards and proposed global FSOC-enabled communication solutions 18. A significant step towards global connectivity has been the establishment of the European Optical Nucleus Network initiative (EONN) 19. Space Agencies and industry have allied to create a multi-site, multi-mission OGSN which supports common optical space communications standards. Participating parties contribute operations time on self-funded optical ground stations to an integrated network that is made available to the space community as a service. The DLR, as one of the founding members, contributes its OGS in Almeria, Spain, to the EONN. The DLR has also developed extensive expertise on optical ground stations over the years and it is continuously extending its own optical antenna park.

2.1 Technological Precursor Site: DLR Oberpfaffenhofen

The DLR Institute of Communications and Navigation (IKN) has developed optical ground stations since 2004, starting with a 40 cmcentimeter\mathrm{cm}roman_cm telescope for orbital checkout of the first coherent satellite Laser Communications Terminal (LCT) onboard the TerraSAR-X Satellite, with campaigns in Oberpfaffenhofen and Calar Alto, see Figure 1. This ground station was later permanently installed on the rooftop of IKN for experiments with the Japanese OICETS/Kirari satellite with its LUCE-Terminal, performing the first LEO satellite data downlinks in Europe 20. Additional experiments were performed (such as aeronautical quantum key distribution 21, or links with the OPALS terminal by JPL on the ISS and NICT’s SOKRATES 22), before the facility underwent a major refurbishment, including a larger telescope (80 cmcentimeter\mathrm{cm}roman_cm) and the addition of a Coudé beam path to a laboratory room.

The OGSOP-new became operational in 2021 and is currently employed in bidirectional links with adaptive optics (AO) and AO-predistortion to geostationary satellites, and for the checkout of the various LEO satellites carrying diverse OSIRIS-terminals (Optical Space InfraRed link System) 23, namely the Flying Laptop 24, BIROS 25, and PIXL 26. Future utilization will be for tests with OSIRISv3 for data downlinks with more than 10 Gbit s1timesgigabitsecond1\mathrm{Gbit}\text{\,}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}start_ARG roman_Gbit end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_s end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG, checkout of inter-satellite link terminals (CubeISL), and quantum Key Distribution (QKD) satellite terminals (QUBE) 27.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 1: The OGSOP-new 80 cmcentimeter\mathrm{cm}roman_cm Ritchey-Chretien Telescope, and adjacent functional Diagram of OGSOP-new with Coude-Room underneath hosting various experiments for AO and QKD. Image: DLR

The TOGS (Transportable Optical Ground Station, by DLR-IKN) was built in 2011 to enable temporary OGS operations at remote locations. It consists of a 60 cmcentimeter\mathrm{cm}roman_cm aluminium telescope in an airfreight-sized box that also holds the operations computer and any receiver and transmitter equipment for data transmission, as well as mechanics to extend the telescope and mount from its container, see figure 2. This assembly can be stored and transported by a custom-built vehicle that also holds an operations room. TOGS was operated on the Island of La Palma for demonstrating the optical remote control of robotic operations from space 28, and performed FSOC links to a hypersonic jet fighter in flight 29. It is now regularly used for OSIRIS checkout operations and in conjunction with other DLR-OGSs conducted joined observations of LEO LASER downlinks 30.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Transportable Optical Ground Station (TOGS) with transport-van housing also the operations room. Image: DLR

Based on the developments for the IKN-OGSs, developments for operational ground stations in Almeria (FOGATA) and at the DLR-site Trauen (LaBoT) are in progress, making use of the SOFA unit (see Section 2.3) as communications equipment. In preparation for these sites, the German Space Operations Center (GSOC) has realized a test facility at its premises in Oberpfaffenhofen. Residing on the rooftop of the control center building, this installation serves to host the initial engineering models of the station equipment used at the remote OGS sites. Instruments are integrated in the operational network and control environment at GSOC for verification and validation campaigns at system and sub-system level. Protected by a roll-off cabin, diverse telescopes and mounts have been installed. The latest setup consists of a mid-range COTS telescope (TS 12-̈-f/8-Ritchey-Chrétien-Astrograph, TS-Optics, Munich, Germany) at a precision mount in Alt-Az configuration (L-350, PlaneWave Instruments, Adrian, Michigan). Depending on the particular instrument attached to the telescope, the measurements include (1) pointing and tracking accuracy with a camera-based setup 30; (2) optical signal strength with an InGaAs-PIN-based photoreceiver (OE-200-S, FEMTO, Berlin, Germany); (3) bit-error-rates utilizing optimized detector heads (APDRFE-100M and APDRFE-1G, joint development of DLR and LiPaCom, Puergen, Germany). The setup can be equipped with the DLR SOFA to create a complete OGS including different transmit sources. All components are remotely controlled using an in-house developed monitoring and control (M&C) system 31.

2.2 German Optical Ground Station Network

The DLR manages the integration of several optical ground stations into a German OGS network (GOGSN, cf. Fig. 3): DLR/GSOC is building the Free-space Optical Ground Antenna TAbernas (FOGATA)32 at the Plataforma Solar de Almeria, a solar research site of the Spanish Centre for Energy, Environmental and Technological Research (CIEMAT). DLR/RSC3 (Responsive Space Cluster Competence Center) together with their prime contractor DiGOS Potsdam have implemented the Laser-Bodenstation (engl: Laser Groundstation) Trauen (LaBoT) 33, 34, the SPACE Research Center of the University of the Bundeswehr Munich is currently setting up the affiliated OGS at their Neubiberg (NBB) campus 35 and the Technical University of Berlin is going to realize a combined FSOC and Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) station at the DLR site Neustrelitz (NSG).

Refer to caption
Figure 3: German Optical Ground Station Network with access to the European Optical Nucleus Network. Inset: Average Cloud Fraction Coverage (CFC) in Europe36.

Table 1 gives an overview on the specifications of those ground stations. Network load is handled via a reactive planning process, taking into account spacecraft visibilities and terminal constraints, as well as actual weather conditions at the OGS locations 37. Station telemetry is shared utilizing the upcoming CCSDS standard for Service Management 38 allowing for automated scheduling. In addition, the European Optical Nucleus Network can be accessed via the respective application programming interface (API). All OGSs follow the design of a robotic observatory consisting of an RC-telescope on a precision mount in a slit-type dome and a containerized control section hosting the electronic system. They will be featured with a common instrument (SOFA) to harmonize their air-to-ground interface gearing them towards compatibility with the upcoming CCSDS standard O3K 39.

Table 1: Features of the German Optical Ground Station Network Nodes
FOGATA LaBoT OGS NBB OGS NSG (prelim.)
Location Tabernas, Almeria, Spain Trauen, Munster, Germany Neubiberg, Munich, Germany Neustrelitz, Germany
Min. Satellite Elevation 10-deg 20-deg 5-deg 5-deg
Height a.s.l. 489-m 72-m 549-m 66-m
Primary Aperture 600-mm 700-mm 700-mm 700-mm
Wavelengths (Rx) 1550-nm, 1064-nm 1550-nm, 1064-nm 1550-nm, 1064-nm 1550-nm, 1064-nm
Wavelengths (Tx) 1530-nm, 1590-nm 1590-nm 1590-nm 1590-nm
Standard Compatibility CCSDS O3K, SDA CCSDS O3K CCSDS O3K CCSDS O3K
Mean Availability 65% 25% 34% 32%

A cloud-coverage analysis was performed considering the German OGSN and the EONN locations, using the ONUBLA+ software tool. This software exploits a database of weather satellite measurements to determine the cloud-free availability of a selected OGS location. This can be scaled up by selecting multiple locations to create an OGS network, and retrieve the network-wide cloud-free availability. This metric is defined as the percentage of the simulation time over which at least one OGS location has cloud-free visibility. The German OGSN and the EONN networks were created in ONUBLA+, and their cloud-free statistics was investigated using a weather database generated from Meteosat Second Generation satellite measurements from 2009 to 2017. In the weather database, not all exact OGS locations were available. In such cases, the closest location available was selected. Specifically, for the German OGSN, only Oberpfaffenhofen and Neustrelitz locations were available. The other locations were modified as: Munich instead of Neubiberg, Munster instead of Trauen, Granada instead of Almeria. For the EONN, all locations were available, with the exception of Almeria, substituted with Granada for the German OGSN.

Figure 4 presents the cloud fraction correlation values for every OGSN and EONN location combination. It can be observed how the OGSN locations, besides Almeria, show a higher correlation between each other themselves with respect to EONN locations. Correlations among locations belonging to different networks show the lowest correlation values.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Cloud fraction correlation matrix for the German and EONN locations, based on the ONUBLA+ database.

In Fig. 5, the network-wide availabilities are shown for single and combined networks. The German OGSN shows only a 83.68% cloud-free availability, while EONN shows a higher 95.43% availability. Despite having more OGS sites, the GOGSN has a higher correlation among locations, and German locations do not have the most favourable weather. The EONN network has more locations in Mediterranean areas, and a wide-spread configuration.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Cloud-free availability for different network configurations in Europe. This value quantifies the proportion of time during which at least one OGS has clear-sky visibility.

2.3 Small Optical Ground Stations Focal-Optics Assembly: SOFA

The DLR’s Small Optical Ground Stations Focal-Optics Assembly (SOFA) 40, shown in Fig. 6, is a small, fully-integrated, low-cost instrument that is to be mounted on COTS or even existing astronomical telescopes enabling optical communication capabilities. As such, a cost-effective and easy deployment of a fully functional optical ground station can be achieved. With its two low-resolution cameras (one each for infrared and day light) the SOFA unit is able to provide all the required information to the telescope mount to achieve a highly accurate open-loop pointing as well as closed-loop tracking of satellites. Detection of the optical signal is realised both with a calibrated InGaAs-PIN photoreceiver for assessment of the optical signal quality and with a free space optical receiver frontend (RFE, small area, fast APD) for data reception. The SOFA unit is equipped with two fiber ports for coupling to an outgoing spatially diverse laser signal to provide a static or modulated beacon to the satellite and for uplink communications.

The SOFA unit is currently deployed on DLR’s OGS FOGATA (Almería, Spain) as well as on DLR’s OGS LaBoT (Trauen, Germany). Further deployments are planned to the OGS of the University of Auckland, to the OGS of the University of the Bundeswehr Munich (Neubiberg, Germany), as well as DLR’s OGSOP (Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany).

Refer to caption
Figure 6: The Small Optical Ground Station Focal-Optics Assembly (SOFA) as mounted on DLR’s FOGATA telescope.

3 Australasian Optical Ground Station Network: AOGSN

The Australasian Optical Ground Station Network (AOGSN) is a partnership between the Australian National University, the University of Western Australia and the Commonwealth of Australia represented by the Defence Science and Technology Group of the Department of Defence, and The University of Auckland, New Zealand. The AOGSN is made up of existing and proposed research infrastructure including optical ground stations and advanced instrumentation technology to demonstrate networking capability across Australia and New Zealand 9. This section describes the current node capabilities in Australia and site optimisation for node establishment in New Zealand, then presents an analysis of the combined network.

3.1 Australian National University

The ANU Quantum Optical Ground Station (QOGS) is a 70 cmcentimeter\mathrm{cm}roman_cm telescope designed for high-performance optical communication. With a small (<25%) central obscuration and no corrector optics the telescope is optimised for high-throughput of visible and infra-red optical signals. QOGS is situated at the Mount Stromlo Observatory in Canberra, Australia in a purpose-built facility including large optics lab fed via Coudé path, in addition to Nasmyth foci for optical instrument hosting. The Coudé room can contain four large optical benches each addressable by optics individually, providing a stable and consistent environment to host both experimental optical instruments and established infrastructure. Multiple locations for optical benches enables equipment from partners, collaborators, and experimental infrastructure under development to access the telescope in an optimum fashion, with only a steering mirror needed to switch between instruments. The telescope is a high-performance PlaneWave Instruments RC700 41 capable of tracking satellites in LEO with a minimum keyhole, even when fully loaded with additional payloads (cite Lafon SPIE2023 124130V). ANU has demonstrated adaptive optics enhanced quantum communication over a horizontal free-space link, and developed adaptive optics for FSOC including satellite-to-ground links 42.

Refer to caption
Figure 7: The proposed Australasian Optical Ground Station Network 17, 6, with nodes across Australia and New Zealand. Green dots indicate current OGS while red dots indicate potential sites.

3.2 University of Western Australia

The University of Western Australia (UWA) is constructing TeraNet, a three-node optical ground station network within the larger Australasian network. Centred in Western Australia, the aims of the TeraNet project, funded by the Australian Space Agency’s Moon to Mars Demonstrator Mission program, are to deploy the technologies needed to realise the potential of optical communications between ground and space, and to develop a transportable ground station.

TeraNet builds on the success of UWA’s demonstrations of free-space optical links for metrology and communications  43, 44, 45, 46, 47. Most notably, through a SmartSat CRC funded project a robust single-mode fibre coupling between a deployable optical terminal on the ground and a drone-mounted retroreflector to establish and maintain a 100 Gbit s1timesgigabitsecond1\mathrm{Gbit}\text{\,}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}start_ARG roman_Gbit end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_s end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG dual-polarisation quadrature phase shift keying (DP-QPSK) link across 700 mmeter\mathrm{m}roman_m (1.4 kmkilometer\mathrm{km}roman_km folded length) at LEO tracking rates 48 was demonstrated, followed up with links to both a fixed wing aircraft and a helicopter at 5 kmkilometer\mathrm{km}roman_km line-of-sight distance (10  kmkilometer\mathrm{km}roman_km folded, McCann et al. in prep). Through the Australian Space Agency’s Moon to Mars Feasibility Mission, a NASA-O2O compatible high photon efficiency link to a drone was demonstrated 49.

TeraNet-1, previously dubbed the Western Australian Optical Ground Station 50, is a 0.7 mmeter\mathrm{m}roman_m PlaneWave Instruments CDK700 installed on the roof of the physics building at the UWA campus in Perth. It serves as the main research platform where the existing infrastructure and convenient location allow for rapid testing and innovation. First downlink is expected in Q1 2024. TeraNet-2 will be the centerpiece of TeraNet; it will be based on a PlaneWave Instruments RC700 and located at the Mingenew Space Precinct approximately 340 kmkilometer\mathrm{km}roman_km north of Perth. This site experiences one of the lowest fractions of cloud cover in the world 17 and is home to NASA’s MOBLAS-5 Laser Ranging Station, the most productive station in the International Laser Ranging Service network.

TeraNet-3 is a deployable ground station consisting of a PlaneWave instruments CDK17 (0.4 mmeter\mathrm{m}roman_m aperture) mounted on the back of a dual-cab utility vehicle (Figure 8). It is being designed for rapid deployment to demonstrate the benefits optical communications can bring to remote/transient situations such as mine sites, disaster zones, or forward defence deployments. First downlink commissioning is planned for 2024 and will be conducted at ESA’s New Norcia Station. In addition to serving as a demonstrator for a rapidly deployable ground station, TeraNet-3 will also serve as a vehicle for outreach activities, both figuratively and literally.

Refer to caption
Figure 8: The TeraNet-3 mobile optical ground station.

All three TeraNet nodes will be equipped for direct detection optical communications to and from LEO, with DLR providing access to its OSIRIS payloads for commissioning. Thales will also provide access to its Optel-mu terminals, subject to availability. TeraNet-2 will additionally be equipped with high-order adaptive optics for more advanced capabilities: coherent communications compatibility, optical timing and positioning, and HPE lunar communications. By the end of the Moon to Mars Demonstrator Mission, TeraNet will transition to commercial operations.

3.3 Defence Science and Technology Group, South Australia

The DSTG optical ground station, currently under development, is located in Adelaide, South Australia. A major focus of activities is on the assessment and investigation of mitigation strategies for the detrimental effects of the Earth’s atmosphere on optical satellite communications. The research emphasis is on sites at low altitudes, which may be desirable locations from an operational perspective but where the effects of atmospheric turbulence are more significant.

The optical telescope is a 0.5 mm\mathrm{m}roman_m diameter Dall-Kirkham telescope with gold coated mirrors and an L-600 tracking mount manufactured by PlaneWave Instruments. Single mode fibre collimators, to be used for the uplink transmitters, are currently under development and will be mounted on the sides of the main telescope. For initial laser downlink demonstrations, an optical communications payload assembly has been constructed, comprising a beam-splitter, an InGaAs camera, and an avalanche photodetector based communications receiver. The camera, interfaced to the beam-splitter transmit port, is used for alignment and link acquisition and tracking. The communications receiver is interfaced to the beam-splitter reflected port. The assembly is mounted at the telescope’s focus using a lens relay in each arm, with focal lengths selected to adjust the respective FOV’s for the acquisition camera and the photodetector. In future the telescope will be augmented with an adaptive optics payload developed in collaboration with ANU.

3.4 New Zealand Optical Ground Station Sites

Establishing a FSOC ground terminal in New Zealand, suitable for inclusion in an international network of FSOC nodes, was the subject of a feasibility study in 2021. This study was in part motivated by a shared desire for closer collaborative research links between New Zealand, Australia and the DLR.

The set of initial sites in the feasibility study comprises locations which range from minimally developed through to a fully provisioned astronomical observatory. The range of sites considered was deliberately wide so as to illuminate the advantages and challenges associated with establishing an OGS at sites at different locations and in varying states of readiness. A brief summary follows of those sites assessed in the feasibility study and which were integrated with ANU studies on cloud cover fraction statistics.

The University of Auckland maintains a field station at Ardmore, in the north of the North Island. This has been the site of a number of radio physics and atmospheric experiments in the past, and is currently home to a number of environmental science projects. The site is flat and at low altitude. It has power, communications, utility services and a basic mechanical workshop facility. Urenui is a settlement on the east coast of the North Island of New Zealand. It is home to the Māori iwi (tribe) Ngāti Mutunga. It lies in a region of lower than average cloud fraction and the iwi facilities were upgraded in 2020 as part of the then Government’s Provincial Growth Fund 51.

In the South Island, the Black Birch Observatory site was used as a centre of operations in an earlier site testing programme for an astronomical observatory52. It was also the southern sky observatory of the US Naval Observatory, operating from around 1982 to around 1995. The facilities on the site were dismantled and removed in 1997 by amateur astronomers and the site was returned to nature. The Mount John Observatory is the home of four professional telescopes: the 1.8 mmeter\mathrm{m}roman_m Nishimura telescope, the 1 mmeter\mathrm{m}roman_m McLellan telescope, the 0.61 mmeter\mathrm{m}roman_m Optical Craftsman and the 0.61 mmeter\mathrm{m}roman_m Boller and Chivens telescope, see Fig. 9. Road access is excellent, mechanical and electrical engineering facilities are available onsite, and there is accommodation for extended stays by observers and staff. Birdlings Flat is an area 40 kmkilometer\mathrm{km}roman_km south of Christchurch and has been the location of space-related activities, including launch. Nearby is the the Kaitorete spit, which is the location of the Tāwhaki Joint Venture, a commercial partnership between two rūnanga (a rūnanga is an authority set up by and for a tribe) and the New Zealand Government.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 9: Mount John Observatory domes (left) housing the 0.61 mmeter\mathrm{m}roman_m B&C telescope and the 1.8 mmeter\mathrm{m}roman_m Nishimura telescope. Sensing experiments at NIWA’s Atmospheric Research Station, Lauder. The 0.6 mmeter\mathrm{m}roman_m Yock-Allen BOOTES-III robotic telescope enclosure is in the foreground (right).

Further south, NIWA operates an Atmospheric Research Station (ARS) at Lauder in Central Otago. The site specialises in measuring CFCs, ozone, UV levels and greenhouse gases. The NIWA ARS at Lauder has an extensive array of atmospheric sensing equipment, including spectrometers, radiometers, all-sky cameras and clear-sky detectors. Kopuwai/Obelisk is a natural stone feature atop a mountain peak in the Old Man Range, in Otago. The peak is accessed by an unsealed road which is one of the highest in the country.Finally, at the southern tip of the South Island, the Awarua satellite ground station (SGS) is located approximately 10 kmkilometer\mathrm{km}roman_km from Invercargill, New Zealand’s southernmost and most westerly city.

Figure 10 shows a plot of cloud fraction for New Zealand. It is observed that the lowest values occur in the mountainous regions in the South Island of the country.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 10: Cloud coverage fraction for New Zealand, showing the North Island (left), and South Island (right).

Identifying more than one potential site in New Zealand for FSOC is important as the nature of the country’s geography results in weather patterns that are highly variable both on spatial and temporal scales. Therefore, as an outcome of the initial feasibility study, further sites were added. These sites are Waiheke Island, and the satellite communication station north of Warkworth. Waiheke Island in the Hauraki Gulf is relatively near to Auckland and enjoys a sunny micro-climate that supports a vineyard operated by The University of Auckland. Operations at the satellite communication station in Warkworth have recently been transferred to Space Operations New Zealand, which operates a satellite communications station at Awarua.

A site diversity analysis for a selection of potential sites in New Zealand was performed and the results are shown in Fig. 11. The spatial correlation analysis used data obtained during 2015-2022 using the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI) on Himawari-8. Two sites, Black Birch and Kopuwai, are shown in Fig. 7 but excluded from further analysis. The Awarua site was also considered in the feasibility study but was similarly excluded from the site selection.

Sites which are geographically close, such as the Auckland sites of Ardmore and Waiheke, show relatively high correlation values as expected from sharing similar weather patterns. These data are useful when considering where a second ground station node could be built in New Zealand, based on the location of a first ground station. The addition of a second (or further) ground station nodes will improve the reliability of the NZ contribution to the Australasian network. A complete three-site diversity correlation analysis of NZ nodes remains for future work.

Refer to caption
Figure 11: Cloud fraction correlation matrix for prospective New Zealand OGS locations. Measurements with AHI/Himawari-8 from 2015-2022.

In order to accelerate activity and capability in FSOC operations, New Zealand researchers have developed a prototype FSOC ground station at the Ardmore site. A 10{}^{\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT observatory dome (PD10, Technical Innovations) has been installed and houses an L-350 mount from PlaneWave Instruments, Inc. The intended payload comprises the DLR SOFA (Small Optical Ground Stations Focal-optics Assembly) unit 40 and an RC telescope with a 25 cmcentimeter\mathrm{cm}roman_cm primary. Installation of the OTA and SOFA unit is planned for Q1 2024. For calibration and early testing purposes, a secondary telescope (12′′′′{}^{\prime\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT LX200GPS, Meade Instruments) has been mounted on the L-350. A set of three all-sky cameras, developed by NIWA, have been deployed at various sites, including one at Ardmore. These cameras generate cloud image data which is being used in current research into short-term (i.e., on the time-scale of a typical LEO satellite pass) cloud coverage forecasting. Finally, in order to progressively characterise the Ardmore site as an OGS, an integrated seeing monitor (Miratlas) was installed, which comprises a turbulence monitor and weather station.

3.5 Combined Australian-New Zealand FSOC network Performance

A reliability analysis has been performed to optimise the AOGSN configurations and highlight the improvements gained from adding New Zealand OGS to extend existing Australian OGS sites. Networks in Australia and New Zealand have been assumed as base or full variants, with the set of sites corresponding to these configurations in the title of Fig. 12. Reliability estimates are made using the spatially-correlated neuron spike model and with cloud fraction data from VIIRS/SNPP and cloud fraction covariances from AHI/Himawari-8 17. In Fig. 12 reliability is represented as minimising the outage probability. The nodes used in Fig. 12 can be identified in Fig. 7. A particularly important result in Fig. 12 is the 3%percent33\%3 % outage probability of the existing 3 OGS nodes in Australia being reduced to 0.57%percent0.570.57\%0.57 % with the addition of just two OGS in New Zealand, Ardmore and Mt John. Note that this analysis only considers reliability, not capacity or coverage, and that New Zealand significantly expands the longitudinal coverage of a Australasian network.

Refer to caption
Figure 12: Outage probability for numerous AOGSN network configurations. This is defined as the probability that all nodes in a network simultaneously suffer an outage due to cloud fraction and is computed using the spatially-correlated Bernoulli model 17.

4 Future Network Development

Future research work includes improving the throughput of the optical channel for FSOC, securing it using quantum technologies, and maximising the resilience of FSOC ground segment networks. This section summarises some of the work underway in Germany and Australasia towards these goals.

4.1 German FSOC Research

Current research areas associated with the FSOC ground stations network in Germany include measurements of the optical channel to analyze and forecast the availability of optical links in dependence on the geographical location. The results will facilitate updates on existing or the definition of new site diversity and channel models. Basic research on the optical channel is the foundation for further developments of FSOC systems. For example, a precise characterization of the optical channel facilitates the development of new transmission techniques such as multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) for FSO systems 53. A related field of research is the development of new forward error correction codes to counter atmospheric disturbances.

4.2 Adaptive Optics

FSOC systems use adaptive optics to improve performance 54, 42. The Mount John Observatory (MJO) is one of the leading candidates for an OGS in New Zealand, and as there are existing installed telescopes, work has commenced on developing AO capability at this facility. A low-order (tilt) closed-loop adaptive optics system has been installed on the Boller & Chivens telescope at MJO 55. System design parameters were sourced from earlier work developing a turbulence site profile 56. This system was originally developed to partially correct for the adverse effects of imaging space debris through the Earth’s turbulent atmosphere 57. Target objects included large, defunct satellites, both in LEO and GEO. More recently, the tilt AO corrector was used to improve the stability of fringe patterns generated by a modified Michelson interferometer used to measure spatial coherence of satellites for space domain awareness.

The effectiveness of an AO system is highly dependent on source wavelength, where photon absorption (depletion at the sensor or FO collimator) is higher at shorter wavelengths. This suggests that some classical FSOC systems may not require AO, whereas for quantum FSOC systems, which use a shorter wavelength than more conventional systems, a high-order AO system would be considered essential. Currently, a fifth-order dual-mirror (woofer-tweeter) AO system is in development by the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at the University of Canterbury that may meet these requirements.

4.3 Quantum Secured Communications

Quantum key distribution (QKD) is a method in which communicating parties generate and share a secret key where the presence or information leakage to an eavesdropper can be inferred by fundamental quantum mechanics 58. The secret key can then be used to encrypt information sent between parties. QKD networks have been developed globally where the distribution of secret keys have predominantly been fibre-based using DVQKD protocols 59. The most significant demonstration of QKD has been the demonstration of the DVQKD protocol, BB84, from the Micius satellite which distributed secret keys between two optical ground stations in Xinglong, China and Graz, Vienna, 7,600 kmkilometer\mathrm{km}roman_km apart 60. The demonstration achieved a sifted key rate between 3–9 kbit s1timeskilobitsecond1\mathrm{kbit}\text{\,}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}start_ARG roman_kbit end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_s end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG in good weather conditions between a free-space link distance of approximately 1000 kmkilometer\mathrm{km}roman_km and 600 kmkilometer\mathrm{km}roman_km, respectively, validating the feasibility of QKD between LEO satellites and optical ground stations.

In Europe, the European Quantum Communication Infrastructure (EuroQCI) Initiative will make use of innovative quantum communication technologies that are developed, for example, in EU-funded projects such as the Horizon 2020 OpenQKD project 61 or the Quantum Technologies Flagship 62. It will be, furthermore, an integral part of IRIS22{}^{2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, the new EU space-based secure satellite communication system 63.

Each optical ground station discussed in this work will in principle be compatible with QKD though a ground stations suitability for a particular mission would need to be assessed based on the compatibility of transmit and receive apertures. For example a 30 cmcentimeter\mathrm{cm}roman_cm transmission aperture on a LEO satellite would require a similar-to-or-equals\simeqmmeter\mathrm{m}roman_m receive aperture to achieve a positive secret key rate using continuous variable (CV) QKD  64, 65.

4.4 Network Expansion

The utility of each ground station could be extended by connecting to wider ground based fibre networks to link a satellite with multiple ground locations near each optical ground station. Moreover, the distributed network of OGSs constitutes an excellent test-bed to showcase new application scenarios and demonstrate new hard- and software developments.

A natural expansion of the proposed network would be to include the Antarctic continent in order to provide the continent with a high-bandwidth solution that it currently lacks. Australia and New-Zealand are active in research in Antarctica, occupying coastal locations including Casey, Mawson Davis, and Scott bases. These provide possible locations to start expanding the network to the Antarctic region thanks to the existing logistics and relative ease of access. The geographic location of the continent is advantageous to this technology 6 as polar-crossing orbits are favoured by many satellite operators, and therefore there could be many overhead passes of a polar station per day. The interior of the continent, where internet access is the most challenging, has ideal weather conditions for such technology. The skies are amongst the clearest in the world, with 20 %percent\%% cloud cover 66. There is also ample evidence that seeing conditions are excellent which attracts astronomers to the continent 67, 68, 69. Even during the daytime, which can last for months, there are periods where the seeing drops to less than 1” due to the thermal balance between the atmosphere and the highly radiating ice.

To establish a truly global optical communication ground station network, the German and Australasian networks could be combined. Success of such an endeavor will require the continued exchange of best practices and knowledge, and progressively increasing coordination between each network.

5 Conclusions

Successfully and routinely communicating between Earth and space using laser light demands the establishment of a network of interconnected ground stations, located so as to maximise the number of opportunities to establish a link with spacecraft. The performance of a network depends on the geographical disposition of the network nodes and the weather conditions typically experienced at each node.

Spacing ground stations in longitude across the globe provides favourable network access to satellites for typical orbit choices for a telecommunications satellite cluster. Australia and continental Europe are two large land masses extended longitudinally and are developing technologies and operational facilities suitable for inclusion in a optical communications ground station network. The research and commercial opportunities in FSOC has resulted in an increase in funding for this area in Australia and New Zealand and Germany continues its long history of research leadership in FSOC.

Technical developments across the sector have drawn a future FSOC network closer to reality. Modern observatories, comprising telescope mounts capable of tracking satellites reliably are now commonly available on the market and instrumentation such as the DLR’s SOFA unit offers a rapid route to establishing a standard COTS observatory as an FSOC ground segment node in a network.

Site testing is a key ingredient in establishing where optical ground stations might be most favourably placed in an FSOC network. This work presented the two-site correlation values for several locations in New Zealand, derived from an analysis of satellite cloud coverage data. The analysis also included measures of outage probability of a network comprising various combinations of FSOC terminals wholly within each of Australia and New Zealand, and across both nations. The addition of two New Zealand nodes in an Australian network decreased the outage probability of the combined network from 3%percent3\leavevmode\nobreak\ 3\%3 % to 0.6%percent0.6\leavevmode\nobreak\ 0.6\%0.6 %. Owing to the general north-south orientation of New Zealand, additional FSOC terminals will generally only add to the resilience of the network against local weather patterns and not add more grasp of the network that would come from extending the network further in longitude.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), which operates the Himawari-8 satellite. NJR acknowledges Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Mutunga.

Author contributions

NJR contributed to Sections 1, 3.4 and 5. JA contributed to Section 3.4. TT contributed to Section 4.4. MB contributed to Sections 1 and 3. JEC contributed to Sections 3.4 and 4.4. M Sayat and OT contributed to Section 4.3. RTS and AK contributed to Sections 2.2 and 4.1, KM contributed to Section 3.3. DG, JR, MTK contributed to Sections 2 and 4.1. SR contributed to Section 2.2.

Financial disclosure

NJR, JEC, SW, CQ, KW and JA receive funding for this work from New Zealand’s Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment via a Catalyst: Strategic – New Zealand-DLR Joint Research Programme December 2020 and/or a 2021 Catalyst Strategic - New Zealand DLR Joint Research Programme grant.

The Optical Ground Station Neubiberg, Munich, Germany, is funded by dtec.bw - Digitalization and Technology Research Center of the Bundeswehr. dtec.bw is funded by the European Union - NextGenerationEU.

The Quantum Optical Communication Ground Station is funded by A PIP grant from the ACT government and supported by the Moon to Mars Initiative.

The Laser Ground Station Trauen (LaBoT) is supported by the German Federal Ministry of Defense through the technological research and development assignment “Responsive Space Capabilities”, the infrastructure has been subsidized by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interests.

References

  • 1 Anbarasi K, Hemanth C, Sangeetha R. A review on channel models in free space optical communication systems. Optics & Laser Technology. 2017;97:161-171. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2017.06.018
  • 2 CCSDS White Book . Space Optical Communications – Summary of Concept. Informational Report, CCSDS. 2010.
  • 3 Reyes M, Alonso A, Chueca S, et al. Ground-to-space optical communication characterization. In: Voelz DG, Ricklin JC. , eds. Free-Space Laser Communications V. 5892. International Society for Optics and Photonics. SPIE 2005:1 – 16.
  • 4 Kubo-oka T, Kunimori H, Takenaka H, Fuse T, Toyoshima M. Optical Communication Experiment Using Very Small Optical TrAnsponder Component on a Small Satellite RISESAT. In: Kadowaki N. , ed. Proceedings of the ICSOS (International Conference on Space Optical Systems and Application) 2012,ISCOS. 2012; Ajaccio, Corsica, France.
  • 5 Buchheim K. OPTEL-μ𝜇\muitalic_μ: A Compact System for Optical Downlink from LEO Satellites. In: The International Committee on Technical Interchange for Space Mission Operations and Ground Data Systems. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 2012
  • 6 Bennet F, Ferguson K, Grant K, Kruzins E, Rattenbury N, Schediwy S. An Australia/New Zealand optical communications ground station network for next generation satellite communications. In: Hemmati H, Boroson DM. , eds. Free-Space Laser Communications XXXII. 11272. International Society for Optics and Photonics. SPIE 2020:1 – 7.
  • 7 Hemmati H. Deep space optical communications. John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
  • 8 Biswas A, Srinivasan M, Piazzolla S, Hoppe D. Deep space optical communications. In: Hemmati H, Boroson DM. , eds. Free-Space Laser Communication and Atmospheric Propagation XXX. 10524. International Society for Optics and Photonics. SPIE 2018:105240U
  • 9 Bennet F, Thearle O, Roberts L, et al. Free-space quantum communication link with adaptive optics. In: AMOS. 2018.
  • 10 Mink A, Sheila F, Ray P. Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) and Commodity Security Protocols: Introduction and Integration. International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications. 2009;1.
  • 11 Bedington R, Arrazola JM, Ling A. Progress in satellite quantum key distribution. npj Quantum Information. 2017;3.
  • 12 Letzter R. China’s Quantum-Key Network, the Largest Ever, is Officially Online. https://www.livescience.com/61474-micius-china-quantum-key-intercontinental.html; 2018. Accessed: 2020-01-18.
  • 13 Fuchs C, Moll F. Ground station network optimization for space-to-ground optical communication links. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking. 2015;7(12):1148–1159.
  • 14 Fuchs C, Perlot N, Riedi J, Perdigues J. Performance Estimation of Optical LEO Downlinks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. 2018;36(5):1074-1085. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2018.2832831
  • 15 Fuchs C, Poulenard S, Perlot N, Riedi J, Perdigues J. Optimization and throughput estimation of optical ground networks for LEO-downlinks, GEO-feeder links and GEO-relays. In: Hemmati H, Boroson DM. , eds. Free-Space Laser Communication and Atmospheric Propagation XXIX. 10096. International Society for Optics and Photonics. SPIE 2017:298 – 307.
  • 16 Fuchs C. ONUBLA Assessment of access availability of space-ground optical links.; 2017. ESA Contract 4000110718/14/NL/MV.
  • 17 Birch M, Beattie JR, Bennet F, et al. Availability, outage, and capacity of spatially correlated, Australasian free-space optical networks. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking. 2023;15(7):415–430.
  • 18 Borowy C, Hofmann C, Knopp MT, Knopp A, Schuff H, Chrobry A. SatCom 2025–The near future of satellite communications in Germany. In: 69th International Astronautical Congress (IAC). 2018.
  • 19 Krynitz M, Heese C, Knopp MT, Schulz KJ, Henniger H. The European Optical Nucleus Network. In: South African National Space Agency (SANSA). 2021.
  • 20 Perlot N, Knapek M, Giggenbach D, et al. Results of the optical downlink experiment KIODO from OICETS satellite to optical ground station Oberpfaffenhofen (OGS-OP). In: Mecherle S, Korotkova O. , eds. Free-Space Laser Communication Technologies XIX and Atmospheric Propagation of Electromagnetic Waves. 6457. International Society for Optics and Photonics. SPIE Optical Press 2007:645704–1-645704-8
  • 21 Nauerth S, Moll F, Rau M, et al. Air-to-ground quantum communication. Nature Photonics. 2013.
  • 22 Moll F, Kolev D, Abrahamson M, Schmidt C, Mata Calvo R, Fuchs C. LEO-ground scintillation measurements with the optical ground station Oberpfaffenhofen and SOTA/OPALS space terminals. In: SPIE. SPIE Press 2016:999102–1.
  • 23 Fuchs C, Schmidt C. Update on DLR’s OSIRIS program. In: Sodnik Z, Karafolas N, Cugny B. , eds. International Conference on Space Optics—ICSO 2018. 11180. International Society for Optics and Photonics. 2019:111800I.
  • 24 Giggenbach D, Fuchs C, Schmidt C, et al. Optical Data Downlinks from OSIRIS on Flying Laptop Satellite. In: ESA / ESTEC. 2019.
  • 25 Schmidt C, Brechtelsbauer M, Rein F, Fuchs C. OSIRIS Payload for DLR’s BiROS Satellite. In: NICT. 2014.
  • 26 DLR Press Release: Demonstration of data transmission from a microsatellite by laser. Press Release; 2023.
  • 27 Roubal C, Moll F, Rödiger B. Dual Wavelength Optical System for Multiple Quantum Communication Transmitters in Cubesat Platform. In: SPIE. 2021.
  • 28 Shrestha A, Ramírez J, Giggenbach D, Pacheco-Labrador J, Schmidt C. Inter-Island Demonstration of an FSO High Speed Laser Ethernet Transceiver for Telerobotic Space-Surface Control. In: VDE. VDE Verlag Gmbh 2016:851–853.
  • 29 Moll F, Shrestha A, Fuchs C. Ground stations for aeronautical and space laser communications at German Aerospace Center. In: . 9647. International Society for Optics and Photonics. 2015:96470I.
  • 30 Giggenbach D, Karafillis P, Rittershofer J, et al. Transmitter Beam Bias Verification for Optical Satellite Data Downlinks with Open-Loop Pointing – the 3-OGS-Experiment. In: Cugny B, Karafolas N, Sodnik Z. , eds. 2022 IEEE International Conference on Space Optical Systems and Applications, ICSOS 2022SPIE Digital Librery. 2022.
  • 31 Jain H, Kalkhof A, Veit S, Dlubatz M, Knopp MT. A monitoring, control & automation system for optical communication ground stations. In: 2022.
  • 32 Lantschner M, Fuchs C, Bordeaux V, Giggenbach D, Knopp MT. An Optical Ground Station for the German Space Operations Center - Status and Outlook. In: European Space Agency. 2019.
  • 33 Köhler A, Knopp MT, Ohndorf A. Commissioning of the deployable optical ground station at Trauen. In: Ninth International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of Environment. 2023.
  • 34 Köhler A, Knopp MT, Ohndorf A. LaBoT-Laser Ground Station Trauen. In: Optical Nucleus Network. 2022.
  • 35 Schwarz RT, Knopp MT, Le Son H, Koehler A, Knopp A. Optical Ground Station for Free-Space Optical Communication Research and Experimentation. In: VDE. 2023:1–4.
  • 36 Finkensieper S, Meirink JF, Zadelhoff vGJ, et al. CLAAS-2.1: CM SAF CLoud property dAtAset using SEVIRI - Edition 2.1. Satellite Application Facility on Climate Monitoring (CM SAF). 2020.
  • 37 Fürbacher A, Fruth T, Wiebigke A, et al. Concept for Generic Agile, Reactive Optical Link Planning. In: DLR. 2023.
  • 38 Pietras J, Barkley E, Crowson A. CCSDS Space Communication Cross Support Service Management. In: AIAA. 2010
  • 39 Edwards BL. Latest Status of the CCSDS Optical Communications Working Group. In: IEEE. 2022:1-6
  • 40 Knopp MT, Immerz A, Giggenbach D, Köhler A. The Small Optical Ground Stations Focal-Optics Assembly (SOFA). In: International Astronautical Federation. 2022.
  • 41 Hill J. PlaneWave Wins Contract to Build Optical Ground Station in Australia. https://www.satellitetoday.com/innovation/2020/06/15/planewave-wins-contract-to-build-optical-ground-station-in-australia/; 2020. Accessed 1 August 2021.
  • 42 Martinez N, Kish S, Bennet F, Birch M, Lam PK, Ferguson K. AO-enhanced quantum communications with the ANU Optical Ground Station. In: . 12777. SPIE. 2023:2813–2824.
  • 43 Dix-Matthews B, Schediwy S, Gozzard D, et al. Point-to-point stabilized optical frequency transfer with active optics. Nature Communications. 2021;12(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20591-5
  • 44 Gozzard D, Howard L, Dix-Matthews B, Karpathakis S, Gravestock C, Schediwy S. Ultrastable Free-Space Laser Links for a Global Network of Optical Atomic Clocks. Physical Review Letters. 2022;128(2). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.020801
  • 45 Dix-Matthews B, Gozzard D, Karpathakis S, et al. Experimental Demonstration of Velocimetry by Actively Stabilized Coherent Optical Transfer. Physical Review Applied. 2023;19(5). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.054018
  • 46 Karpathakis S, Dix-Matthews B, Gozzard D, Schediwy S. High-bandwidth coherent optical communication over 10.3 km of turbulent air. Applied Optics. 2023;62(23):G85–G89. doi: 10.1364/AO.491440
  • 47 Dix-Matthews B, Gozzard D, Walsh S, et al. Towards optical frequency geopotential difference measurements via a flying drone. Optics Express. 2023;31(9):15075–15088. doi: 10.1364/OE.483767
  • 48 Walsh S, Karpathakis S, McCann A, et al. Demonstration of 100 Gbps coherent free-space optical communications at LEO tracking rates. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22027-0
  • 49 Karpathakis S, Dix-Matthews B, Walsh S, et al. Ground-to-Drone Optical Pulse Position Modulation Demonstration as a Testbed for Lunar Communications. Drones. 2023;7(2). doi: 10.3390/drones7020099
  • 50 Walsh S, Frost A, Anderson W, et al. The Western Australian optical ground station. In: . 2021. IET. 2021:71–78.
  • 51 Managing the Provincial Growth Fund. https://oag.parliament.nz/2020/managing-pgf/docs/managing-pgf.pdf; . Accessed: 2023-01-24.
  • 52 Bateson FM. Final Report on the Site Selection Survey of New Zealand. Publications of the University of Pennsylvania Astronomical Series. 1964;10.
  • 53 Son HL, Schwarz RT, Knopp MT, Giggenbach D, Knopp A. Capacity Analysis of a MIMO Laser Link From Lunar Surface to Earth. In: IEEE. 2022:168-174
  • 54 Wang Y, Xu H, Li D, et al. Performance analysis of an adaptive optics system for free-space optics communication through atmospheric turbulence. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1):1124. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19559-9
  • 55 Liu J, Muruganandan VA, Clare R, Trujillo MCR, Weddell SJ. A Tip-Tilt Mirror Control System for Partial Image Correction at UC Mount John Observatory. In: IEEE. 2020:1-6
  • 56 Mohr JL, Johnston RA, Cottrell PL. Optical Turbulence Measurements and Models for Mount John University Observatory. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia. 2010;27(3):347–359. doi: 10.1071/AS10008
  • 57 Muruganandan V, Lambert A, Liu J, Clare R, Weddell S. Partial Image Reconstruction of an Artificial Satellite in Real Time using Background Natural Stars. In: AMOS. 2023.
  • 58 Bennett CH, Brassard G. Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer, System and Signal Processing. 1984:175–179.
  • 59 Cao Y, Zhao Y, Wang Q, Zhang J, Ng SX, Hanzo L. The evolution of quantum key distribution networks: On the road to the qinternet. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. 2022;24(2):839–894.
  • 60 Chen YA, Zhang Q, Chen TY, et al. An integrated space-to-ground quantum communication network over 4,600 kilometres. Nature. 2021;589(7841):214–219.
  • 61 Horizon 2020 OpenQKD Project. https://openqkd.eu/; . Accessed: 2023-11-21.
  • 62 Quantum Flagship Project. https://qt.eu/; . Accessed: 2023-11-21.
  • 63 IRIS²: the new EU Secure Satellite Constellation. https://defence-industry-space.ec.europa.eu/eu-space-policy/iris2_en; . Accessed: 2023-11-21.
  • 64 Sayat M, Shajilal B, Kish SP, et al. Satellite-to-Ground Continuous Variable Quantum Key Distribution: The Gaussian and Discrete Modulated Protocols in Low Earth Orbit. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.16862v3; 2023.
  • 65 Kish SP, Villaseñor E, Malaney R, Mudge KA, Grant KJ. Feasibility assessment for practical continuous variable quantum key distribution over the satellite-to-Earth channel. Quantum Engineering. 2020;2(3):e50.
  • 66 Adhikari L, Wang Z, Deng M. Seasonal variations of Antarctic clouds observed by CloudSat and CALIPSO satellites. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 2012;117(D4). doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016719
  • 67 Lawrence JS, Ashley MCB, Tokovinin A, Travouillon T. Exceptional astronomical seeing conditions above Dome C in Antarctica. Nature. 2004;431(7006):278–281.
  • 68 Aristidi E, Agabi K, Azouit M, et al. An analysis of temperatures and wind speeds above Dome C, Antarctica. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 2005;430(2):739–746.
  • 69 Aristidi E, Agabi A, Fossat E, et al. Site testing in summer at Dome C, Antarctica. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 2005;444(2):651–659.