Table 1.
Historical classifications of Aconitum subgen. Lycoctonum.
Table 2.
A list of the primers used in this study.
Table 3.
P-values of the partition-homogeneity tests.
The pruned datasets are reconstructed from the original datasets by excluding Acontium apetalum, two accessions of A. barbatum var. barbatum (ZY69 and GQ150), A. fletcheranum, A. gigas var. hondoense, and A. moschatum. Bold-faced values indicate rejection of the null hypothesis with 95% confidence.
Table 4.
Statistics of the nuclear and chloroplast sequence datasets.
Fig 1.
Phylogenetic relationships in Aconitum obtained from an ML analysis of the combined cpDNA dataset.
Numbers above branches are posterior probabilities; numbers below branches are bootstrap values for maximum parsimony/maximum likelihood analyses. “-” indicates that support is less than 50% bootstrap value. Tamura’s (1995) classification of subgen. Lycoctonum are shown on the right. Accessions with a different placement in the nrDNA tree are indicated in bold. The clade of subgen. Aconitum has been collapsed for saving space (see S1 Fig for the complete topology).
Fig 2.
Phylogenetic relationships in Aconitum obtained from an ML analysis of the combined nrDNA dataset.
Numbers above branches are posterior probabilities; numbers below branches are bootstrap values for maximum parsimony/maximum likelihood analyses. Tamura’s (1995) classification of subgen. Lycoctonum are shown on the right. Accessions with a different placement in the cpDNA tree are indicated in bold. The clade of subgen. Aconitum has been collapsed for saving space (see S2 Fig for the complete topology).
Table 5.
P-values of the WSR and AU tests.
The pruned datasets are reconstructed from the original datasets by excluding Aconitum apetalum, two accessions of A. barbatum var. barbatum (ZY69 and GQ150), A. fletcheranum, A. gigas var. hondoense, and A. moschatum. Bold-faced values indicate rejection of the null hypothesis with 95% confidence.
Fig 3.
Phylogenetic relationships in Aconitum obtained from an ML analysis of the combined cpDNA and nrDNA dataset.
Numbers above branches are posterior probabilities; numbers below branches are bootstrap values for maximum parsimony/maximum likelihood analyses. “-” indicates that support is less than 50% bootstrap value. Tamura’s (1995) classification and our new classification of subgen. Lycoctonum are shown on the right. Accessions with different placements between the cpDNA tree and the nrDNA tree are indicated in bold. The clade of subgen. Aconitum has been collapsed for saving space (see S3 Fig for the complete topology).