Persoonia 21, 2008: 29 – 55
www.persoonia.org
RESEARCH ARTICLE
doi:10.3767/003158508X340742
Resolving the phylogenetic and taxonomic status of
dark-spored teleomorph genera in the Botryosphaeriaceae
A.J.L. Phillips 1, A. Alves 2, S.R. Pennycook 3, P.R. Johnston 3, A. Ramaley 4,
A. Akulov 5, P.W. Crous 6
Key words
Barriopsis
Diplodia
Dothiorella
EF1-α
ITS
Lasiodiplodia
LSU
Neodeightonia
Phaeobotryon
Phaeobotryosphaeria
phylogeny
Spencermartinsia
Sphaeropsis
SSU
Abstract Species in the Botryosphaeriaceae are common plant pathogens and saprobes found on a variety of
mainly woody hosts. Teleomorphs typically have hyaline, aseptate ascospores. However, some have been reported
with brown ascospores and their taxonomic status is uncertain. A multi-gene approach (SSU, ITS, LSU, EF1-α and
β-tubulin) was used to resolve the correct phylogenetic position of the dark-spored ‘Botryosphaeria’ teleomorphs
and related asexual species. Neodeightonia and Phaeobotryon are reinstated for species with brown ascospores
that are either 1-septate (Neodeightonia) or 2-septate (Phaeobotryon). Phaeobotryosphaeria is reinstated for species with brown, aseptate ascospores that bear an apiculus at either end. The status of Sphaeropsis is clarified
and shown to be the anamorph of Phaeobotryosphaeria. Two new genera, namely Barriopsis for species having
brown, aseptate ascospores without apiculi and Spencermartinsia for species having brown, 1-septate ascospores
with an apiculus at either end are introduced. Species of Dothiorella have brown, 1-septate ascospores and differ
from Spencermartinsia in the absence of apiculi. These six genera can also be distinguished from one another
based on morphological characters of their anamorphs. Although previously placed in the Botryosphaeriaceae,
Dothidotthia, was shown to belong in the Pleosporales, and the new family Dothidotthiaceae is introduced to
accommodate it.
Article info Received: 29 April 2008; Accepted: 4 July 2008; Published: 16 July 2008.
InTRoduCTIon
The genus Botryosphaeria based on the type species, B. do
thidea, typically has ascospores that are hyaline and aseptate,
although they can become brown and septate with age (Saccardo 1877, von Arx & Müller 1954, 1975, Denman et al. 2000).
Because some species of Botryosphaeria have ascospores
that become brown with age, von Arx & Müller (1954) placed
Dothidea visci with brown ascospores in Botryosphaeria as
B. visci. Later, von Arx & Müller (1975) also placed the darkspored Neodeightonia subglobosa in Botryosphaeria. Since
this is the type species of Neodeightonia (1970), this genus
was reduced to synonymy with Botryosphaeria (1863). In
recognising these synonymies, von Arx & Müller (1954, 1975)
broadened the concept of Botryosphaeria to include species
with brown ascospores.
At least 18 anamorph genera have been associated with Botryo
sphaeria. Denman et al. (2000) recognised only two of these,
namely Fusicoccum and Diplodia. However, in view of the
range of morphologies found in Botryosphaeria anamorphs, the
1
2
3
4
5
6
Centro de Recursos Microbiológicos, Departamento de Ciências da Vida,
Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829516, Caparica, Portugal; corresponding author e-mail: alp@fct.unl.pt.
CESAM, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193
Aveiro, Portugal.
Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland
1142, New Zealand.
7 Animas Place, Durango, CO 81301, USA.
Department of Mycology and Plant Resistance, V.N. Karasin National
University of Kharkov, Svobody sq. 4, Kharkov 61077, Ukraine.
CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre, P.O. Box 85167, 3508 AD Utrecht, The
Netherlands.
proposal by Denman et al. (2000) is probably too conservative.
Although Denman et al. (2000) suggested that Lasiodiplodia
could be a synonym of Diplodia, authors of recent papers accept these as distinct genera (Pavlic et al. 2004, Burgess et al.
2006, Damm et al. 2007, Alves et al. 2008).
Phillips et al. (2005) resurrected the genus Dothiorella for
species with 1-septate conidia that darken at an early stage
of development, and teleomorphs that have brown, 1-septate
ascospores. Phylogenetically (ITS+EF1-α) these species fell
within the broad morphological concept of Botryosphaeria (Phillips et al. 2005) as recognised by von Arx & Müller (1954, 1975).
For these reasons, Phillips et al. (2005) described the teleomorphs of Dothiorella as two new species of Botryosphaeria
with brown, 1-septate ascospores. Subsequently, Luque et al.
(2005) described another dark-spored Botryosphaeria, namely
B. viticola, with a Dothiorella anamorph. Crous et al. (2006)
referred to the clade with Dothiorella anamorphs as Dothidot
thia because of the strong resemblance of the teleomorphs to
that genus. However, in a morphological study of Dothidotthia
aspera from diverse hosts, Ramaley (2005) showed that the
anamorph is a hyphomycete, Thyrostroma negundinis, and
that this species and possibly D. symphoricarpi, type of Dothi
dotthia, are unrelated to the Botryosphaeriaceae (Schoch et
al. 2006).
Although the teleomorphs of Botryosphaeria tend to be morphologically conserved, the anamorphs display a wide range
of morphologies. Based on the morphological diversity of the
anamorphs linked to species of Botryosphaeria, Crous et al.
(2006) suggest that these taxa represent more than a single
genus. By including teleomorphs with brown ascospores in
© 2008 Nationaal Herbarium Nederland & Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures
You are free to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work, under the following conditions:
Attribution:
You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
Non-commercial:
You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
No derivative works: You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.
For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work, which can be found at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode. Any of the above conditions can be
waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author’s moral rights.
30
Table 1 Isolates studied in this paper.
Accession
number 1
Host
Locality
Barriopsis fusca
Bimuria novaezelandiae
Botryosphaeria corticis
CBS 174.26
CBS 107.79
CBS119047
ATCC 22927
CBS 115476
CBS 110302
CBS 418.64
CBS 675.92
CBS 147.52
AFTOL 54
AFTOL 1591
AFTOL 1599
IMI 373225
CBS 910.73
CBS 112549
CBS 112546
CBS 242.51
CBS 168.87
CBS 261.85
CBS 188.87
CBS 112553
CBS 230.30
CBS 393.84
CBS 109727
CBS 109725
CBS 109943
CBS 116470
CBS 116472
CBS 113423
CBS 109944
CBS 112555
CBS 119049
AFTOL 274
CPC 12928
CPC 12930
CPC 12932
CPC 12933
CPC 12929
AFTOL 1359
CBS 115041
CBS 113188
IMI 63581b
CBS 115038
CAA 005
CAP 187
JL 599
AFTOL 1360
CBS 111645
AFTOL 1305
CBS 110492
CBS 118741
CBS 115812
CBS 116355
CBS 356.59
CBS 494.78
Citrus sp.
soil
Vaccinium corymbosum
Vaccinium sp.
Prunus sp.
Vitis vinifera
Tsuga heterophylla
Medicago sativa
Coffea robusta
Zea mays
man, skin, foot
dung of rabbit
Unknown
Acer pseudoplatanus
Quercus suber
Quercus ilex
Unknown
Cupressus sempervirens
Cupressus sempervirens
Juglans regia
Vitis vinifera
Phoenix dactylifera
Pinus nigra
Pinus radiata
Pinus patula
Pinus patula
Prunus africana
Prunus africana
Pinus greggii
Pinus greggii
Vitis vinifera
Vitis sp.
Unknown
Fendlera rupicola
Euonymus alatus
Acer negundis
Acer negundis
Symphoricarpos rotundifolia
Daphne cannabina
Quercus ilex
Quercus suber
Ulmus sp.
Malus pumila
Pistacia vera
Prunus dulcis
Corylus avellana
Rubus sp.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
Salix sp.
Unknown
Santalum album
Syzygium cordatum
Syzygium cordatum
Theobroma cacao
Cassava-field soil
Cuba
New Zealand
USA
USA
Switzerland
Portugal
Canada
USA
Zaire
Unknown
Netherlands
Netherlands
USA
Germany
Portugal
Spain
Italy
Israel
Israel
France
Portugal
USA
Netherlands
South Africa
South Africa
Indonesia
Ethiopia
Ethiopia
Mexico
Mexico
Portugal
Italy
Unknown
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
India
Spain
Spain
United Kingdom
Netherlands
USA
Portugal
Spain
Unknown
USA
USA
Unknown
Australia
South Africa
South Africa
Sri Lanka
Colombia
Botryosphaeria dothidea
‘Botryosphaeria’ tsugae
Byssothecium circinans
Capnodium coffeae
Cochliobolus heterostrophus
Davidiella tassiana
Delitschia winteri
Didymella cucurbitacearum
Diplodia acerina
Diplodia corticola
Diplodia coryli
Diplodia cupressi
Diplodia juglandis
Diplodia mutila
Diplodia pinea A
Diplodia pinea C
Diplodia rosulata
Diplodia scrobiculata
Diplodia seriata
Dothidea sambuci
Dothidotthia sp.
Dothidotthia sp.
Dothidotthia sp.
Dothidotthia sp.
Dothidotthia symphoricarpi
Dothiora cannabinae
Dothiorella iberica
Dothiorella sarmentorum
Dothiorella sp.
Dothiorella sp.
Dothiorella sp.
Elsinoë veneta
Guignardia bidwelli
Hysteropatella clavispora
Lasiodiplodia crassispora
Lasiodiplodia gonubiensis
Lasiodiplodia parva
GenBank2
SSU
LSU
ITS
EF1-α
β-tubulin
EU673182
AY016338
EU673175
EU673176
EU673173
EU673174
EU673208
AY016339
DQ247808
AY544727
DQ678022
DQ678026
AY293779
EU673160
EU673206
EU673207
EU673162
EU673209
EU673210
EU673161
EU673213
EU673214
EU673219
EU673220
EU673222
EU673221
EU673211
EU673212
EU673217
EU673218
EU673215
EU673216
AY544722
EU673225
EU673226
EU673227
EU673228
EU673224
DQ479933
EU673155
EU673156
EU673158
EU673159
EU673157
EU673163
EU673164
DQ678007
EU673223
DQ678006
EU673189
EU673190
EU673193
EU673194
EU673200
EU673201
DQ377857
AY016356
EU673244
EU673245
AY928047
EU673243
DQ377867
AY016357
DQ247800
AY544645
DQ678074
DQ678077
AY293792
EU673234
AY928051
EU673262
EU673235
EU673263
EU673264
DQ377891
AY928049
EU673265
DQ377893
EU673269
EU673270
EU673271
DQ377896
DQ377897
EU673267
EU673268
AY928050
EU673266
AY544681
EU673272
EU673274
EU673275
EU673276
EU673273
DQ470984
AY928053
EU673230
AY928052
DQ377860
EU673231
EU673232
EU673233
DQ678060
DQ377876
AY541493
EU673251
DQ377901
DQ377902
EU673252
EU673257
EU673258
EU673330
–
DQ299245
DQ299247
AY236949
AY259092
DQ458888
–
–
–
–
–
–
EU673315
AY259100
AY259090
EU673317
DQ458893
DQ458894
EU673316
AY259093
DQ458886
DQ458895
DQ458897
DQ458896
DQ458898
EU430265
EU430266
DQ458900
DQ458899
AY259094
DQ458889
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
AY573202
AY573198
AY573212
AY573206
EU673312
EU673313
EU673314
–
–
–
EF622086
DQ103550
DQ458892
AY639594
EF622082
EF622084
EU673296
–
EU017539
EU673291
AY236898
AY573218
DQ458873
–
–
–
–
–
–
EU673282
AY573227
EU673310
EU673284
DQ458878
DQ458879
EU673283
AY573219
DQ458869
DQ458880
DQ458882
DQ458881
DQ458883
EU430267
EU430268
DQ458885
DQ458884
AY573220
DQ458874
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
AY573222
EU673278
AY573235
AY573223
EU673279
EU673280
EU673281
–
–
–
EF622066
EU673303
DQ458877
DQ103567
EF622062
EF622064
EU673109
–
EU673107
EU673108
AY236927
EU673106
DQ458855
–
–
–
–
–
–
EU673139
DQ458853
EU673117
EU673105
DQ458861
DQ458862
EU673119
DQ458850
DQ458849
DQ458863
DQ458865
DQ458864
DQ458866
EU673132
EU673131
DQ458868
DQ458867
DQ458856
DQ458857
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
EU673096
EU673097
EU673102
EU673101
EU673098
EU673100
EU673099
–
–
–
EU673134
EU673133
DQ458860
EU673126
EU673113
EU673114
Persoonia – Volume 21, 2008
Species
1
Suriname
Costa Rica
Queensland
USA
New Guinea
USA
Venezuela
Algeria
Unknown
Australia
Switzerland
USA
Switzerland
Unknown
Netherlands
Argentina
USA
Spain
Spain
United Kingdom
Portugal
Portugal
Australia
Australia
New Zealand
Portugal
USA
Hawaii
Hawaii
Hawaii
Hawaii
Hawaii
Hawaii
New Zealand
New Zealand
South Africa
Luxembourg
Germany
Ukraine
Ukraine
Unknown
Unknown
Brazil
Netherlands
Unknown
Venezuela
Venezuela
Unknown
Spain
Spain
South Africa
France
New Zealand
New Zealand
New Zealand
New Zealand
USA
EU673198
EU673199
EU673191
EU673195
EU673196
EU673197
EU673192
DQ384068
DQ470993
DQ677994
DQ678017
DQ678013
DQ813513
AF164370
DQ471017
AY016347
EU673203
EU673204
EU673205
EU673202
EU673148
EU673149
EU673153
EU673154
EU673151
EU673150
EU673152
EU673183
EU673184
EU673185
EU673186
EU673187
EU673188
EU673180
EU673181
EU673179
EU673177
EU673178
–
–
AY544725
DQ678014
AY016349
DQ678027
AY544726
EU673146
EU673147
AY545724
EU673165
EU673166
EU673167
EU673168
EU673171
EU673172
EU673169
EU673170
AY544692
EU673255
EU673256
DQ377903
AY928054
EU673253
EU673254
DQ377904
DQ384106
DQ470946
DQ678044
DQ678069
DQ678065
DQ813509
DQ678086
DQ470968
AY016365
EU673259
EU673260
EU673261
DQ377866
AY928043
EU673229
DQ377920
DQ377921
AY928045
AY928046
AY928044
DQ377898
EU673248
DQ377899
EU673249
DQ377900
EU673250
EU673246
EU673247
DQ377894
DQ377870
DQ377868
–
–
AY544684
DQ678066
AY016366
DQ678078
AY544686
DQ377931
DQ377932
AY545728
DQ377873
EU673236
EU673237
EU673238
EU673241
EU673242
EU673239
EU673240
AY544648
EF622081
EF622077
DQ103553
DQ458890
AY640255
DQ458891
DQ103547
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
EU673338
EU673339
EU673340
EU673337
AY259091
EU673311
AY615185
AY615186
AY236943
AY259098
–
EU673331
EU673332
EU673333
EU673334
EU673335
EU673336
EU673328
EU673329
AY343379
EU673324
EU673325
EU673326
EU673327
–
–
–
–
–
AY693974
DQ436935
–
AY905554
AY905555
EU673318
EU673319
EU673322
EU673323
EU673320
EU673321
–
EF622060
EF622057
EU673304
DQ458875
AY640258
DQ458876
EU673305
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
EU673307
EU673308
EU673309
EU673306
AY573217
EU673277
DQ093221
DQ093220
AY236888
AY573221
–
EU673297
EU673298
EU673299
EU673300
EU673301
EU673302
EU673294
EU673295
AY343340
EU673292
EU673293
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
AY693975
DQ436936
–
AY905559
AY905562
EU673285
EU673286
EU673289
EU673290
EU673287
EU673288
–
EU673112
EU673111
EU673136
DQ458858
EU673110
DQ458859
EU673129
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
EU673138
EU673115
EU673116
EU673137
DQ458848
EU673092
AY615172
AY615173
AY236917
EU673095
–
EU673125
EU673121
EU673124
EU673120
EU673123
EU673122
EU673140
EU673141
EU673130
EU673127
EU673128
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
EU673094
EU673093
–
EU673104
EU673103
EU673118
EU673135
EU673144
EU673145
EU673142
EU673143
–
Acronyms of culture collections: AFTOL – Assembling the Fungal Tree of Life; CAA – A. Alves, Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal; CAP – Alan J.L. Phillips, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal; CBS – Centraalbureau voor
Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CMW – M.J. Wingfield, FABI, University of Pretoria, South Africa; IMI – CABI Bioscience, Egham, U.K.; JL – J. Luque, IRTA, Spain.
Sequence numbers in italics were retrieved from GenBank. All others were obtained in the present study.
31
2
Citrus aurantium
Gmelina arborea
Eucalyptus grandis
Unknown
Fruit along coral reef coast
Vitis vinifera
Acacia mangium
sandy desert soil
Unknown
Medicago rugosa
Prunus spinosa
Platanus occidentalis
Phragmites australis
Opuntia sp.
Quercus robur
Chrysomphalus aonidium
Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix canariensis
Phoenix dactylifera
keratomycosis in eye
Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera
Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica
Pinus nigra
Vitis vinifera
Ribes sp.
Sophora chrysophylla
Sophora chrysophylla
Sophora chrysophylla
Sophora chrysophylla
Sophora chrysophylla
Sophora chrysophylla
Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis
Vitis vinifera
Viscum album
Viscum album
Viscum album
Viscum album
Unknown
Unknown
man, hair
Betula verrucosa
Unknown
Eucalyptus hybrid
Eucalyptus hybrid
Unknown
Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera
Medicago sativa
Poniciana gilliesii
Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis
downed rotting wood
A.J.L. Phillips et al.: Dark-spored teleomorph genera in Botryosphaeriaceae
CBS 447.62
CBS 116459
Lasiodiplodia rubropurpurea
CBS 118740
Lasiodiplodia theobromae
CBS 124.13
CBS 164.96
CAA 006
Lasiodiplodia venezuelensis
CBS 118739
Lepidosphaeria nicotiae
CBS 559.71
Leptosphaeria maculans
AFTOL 277
Lewia eureka
AFTOL 267
Lophiostoma crenatum
AFTOL 1581
Massaria platani
AFTOL 1574
Massarina arundinacea
CBS 619.86
Montagnula opulenta
AFTOL 1734
Mycosphaerella punctiformis
AFTOL 942
Myriangium duriaei
CBS 260.36
Neodeightonia phoenicum
CBS 169.34
CBS 123168
CBS 122528
Neodeightonia subglobosa
CBS 448.91
Neofusicoccum luteum
CBS 110299
CBS 110497
Neofusicoccum mangiferum
CBS 118531
CBS 118532
Neofusicoccum parvum
CMW 9081
CBS 110301
Neofusicoccum ribis
CBS115475
Phaeobotryon mamane
CPC 12264
CPC 12440
CPC 12442
CPC 12443
CPC 12444
CPC 12445
Phaeobotryosphaeria citrigena
ICMP 16812
ICMP 16818
Phaeobotryosphaeria porosa
CBS 110496
Phaeobotryosphaeria visci
CBS 100163
CBS 186.97
CBS 122526
CBS 122527
Phaeosphaeria avenaria
AFTOL 280
Phoma herbarum
AFTOL 1575
Piedraia hortae
CBS 480.64
Pleomassaria siparia
AFTOL 1600
Preussia terricola
AFTOL 282
Pseudofusicoccum stromaticum
CBS 117448
CBS 117449
Sordaria fimicola
–
Spencermartinsia vitícola
CBS 117009
CBS 117006
Spencermartinsia sp. (as Diplodia medicaginis)
CBS 500.72
Spencermartinsia sp. (as Diplodia spegazziniana) CBS 302.75
Spencermartinsia sp.
ICMP 16827
Spencermartinsia sp.
ICMP 16828
Spencermartinsia sp.
ICMP 16819
Spencermartinsia sp.
ICMP 16824
Xylaria hypoxylon
AFTOL 51
Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae
32
Botryosphaeria, Phillips et al. (2005) broadened the concept of
the genus even further. Through a study of partial sequences of
the LSU gene, Crous et al. (2006) showed that Botryosphaeria
s.l. is composed of 10 phylogenetic lineages that correspond to
different anamorph genera. To avoid the unnecessary introduction of new generic names, they opted to use existing anamorph
generic names for most of the lineages, and restricted the use of
Botryosphaeria to B. dothidea and B. corticis. In their phylogeny,
a large clade consisting of Diplodia and Lasiodiplodia species
was largely unresolved. Within this clade are species known
to have hyaline ascospores, e.g. B. corticola, B. stevensii, and
others reported to have dark ascospores, e.g. B. subglobosa
and B. visci.
The aim of the present study was to use a multigene approach
to determine the correct taxonomy and phylogeny of the darkspored Botryosphaeria-like teleomorphs and their associated
anamorphs and to resolve the phylogenetic position of the
genus Dothidotthia.
MATERIALS And METHodS
DNA isolation, PCR amplification and sequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted from mycelium following the
method of Alves et al. (2004). PCR reactions were carried out
with Taq polymerase, nucleotides and buffers supplied by MBI
Fermentas (Vilnius, Lithuania) and PCR reaction mixtures were
prepared according to Alves et al. (2004), with the addition of
5 % DMSO to improve the amplification of some difficult DNA
templates. All primers used were synthesised by MWG Biotech
AG (Ebersberg, Germany).
A portion of the nuclear ribosomal SSU gene was amplified with
primers NS1 and NS4 (White et al. 1990). The amplification
conditions were as follows: initial denaturation of 5 min at 95 °C,
followed by 35 cycles of 45 s at 94 °C, 45 s at 48 °C and 90 s
at 72 °C, and a final extension period of 10 min at 72 °C. The
nucleotide sequence of the SSU region was determined using
the above primers along with the internal sequencing primers
NS2 and NS3 (White et al. 1990).
Part of the nuclear rRNA cluster comprising the ITS region plus
the D1/D2 variable domains of the ribosomal LSU gene was
amplified using the primers ITS1 (White et al. 1990) and NL4
(O’Donnell 1993) as described by Alves et al. (2005). Nucleotide
sequences of the ITS and D1/D2 regions were determined as
described previously (Alves et al. 2004, 2005) using the primers
ITS4 (White et al. 1990) and NL1 (O’Donnell 1993) as internal
sequencing primers.
The primers EF1-688F (Alves et al. 2008) and EF1-986R (Carbone & Kohn 1999) and Bt2a and Bt2b (Glass & Donaldson
1995) were used to amplify and sequence part of the translation
elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-α) gene and part of the β-tubulin
gene, respectively. Amplification and nucleotide sequencing of
the EF1-α and β-tubulin genes was performed as described
previously (Alves et al. 2006, 2008).
The amplified PCR fragments were purified with the JETQUICK
PCR Purification Spin Kit (GENOMED, Löhne, Germany). Both
strands of the PCR products were sequenced according to
the procedures described previously (Alves et al. 2004), while
Persoonia – Volume 21, 2008
some were sequenced by STAB Vida Lda (Portugal). The
nucleotide sequences were read and edited with FinchTV
1.4.0 (Geospiza Inc. http://www.geospiza.com/finchtv). All
sequences were checked manually and nucleotide arrangements at ambiguous positions were clarified using both primer
direction sequences.
Phylogenetic analyses
Sequences were aligned with ClustalX v. 1.83 (Thompson et al.
1997), using the following parameters: pairwise alignment parameters (gap opening = 10, gap extension = 0.1) and multiple
alignment parameters (gap opening = 10, gap extension = 0.2,
transition weight = 0.5, delay divergent sequences = 25 %).
Alignments were checked and manual adjustments were made
where necessary. Phylogenetic information contained in indels
(gaps) was incorporated into the phylogenetic analyses using
simple indel coding as implemented by GapCoder (Young &
Healy 2003).
Phylogenetic analyses of sequence data were done using
PAUP v. 4.0b10 (Swofford 2003) for Maximum-parsimony (MP)
analyses and Mr Bayes v. 3.0b4 (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck
2003) for Bayesian analyses. Trees were visualised with TreeView (Page 1996).
Maximum-parsimony analyses were performed using the heuristic search option with 1 000 random taxa addition and tree
bisection and reconnection (TBR) as the branch-swapping
algorithm. All characters were unordered and of equal weight
and gaps were treated as missing data. Branches of zero
length were collapsed and all multiple, equally parsimonious
trees were saved. The robustness of the most parsimonious
trees was evaluated from 1 000 bootstrap replications (Hillis &
Bull 1993). Other measures used were consistency index (CI),
retention index (RI) and homoplasy index (HI).
Bayesian analyses employing a Markov Chain Monte Carlo
method were performed. The general time-reversible model of
evolution (Rodriguez et al. 1990), including estimation of invariable sites and assuming a discrete gamma distribution with six
rate categories (GTR+Γ+G) was used. Four MCMC chains were
run simultaneously, starting from random trees for 1 000 000
generations. Trees were sampled every 100th generation for
a total of 10 000 trees. The first 1 000 trees were discarded
as the burn-in phase of each analysis. Posterior probabilities
(Rannala & Yang 1996) were determined from a majority-rule
consensus tree generated with the remaining 9 000 trees.
This analysis was repeated three times starting from different
random trees to ensure trees from the same tree space were
sampled during each analysis.
In this study we assessed the possibility of combining the individual datasets by comparing highly supported clades among
trees generated from the different datasets to detect conflict.
High support typically refers to bootstrap support values ≥ 70 %
and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 95 % (Alfaro et al. 2003).
If no conflict exists between the highly supported clades in trees
generated from these different datasets, it is likely that the genes
share similar phylogenetic histories and phylogenetic resolution
and support could ultimately be increased by combining the
datasets (Miller & Huhndorf 2004).
33
A.J.L. Phillips et al.: Dark-spored teleomorph genera in Botryosphaeriaceae
coded alignment gaps. Indels were coded separately and added
to the end of the alignment as characters 1682 –1742. Of the
1742 characters, 1203 were constant, while 168 were variable
and parsimony uninformative. Maximum parsimony analysis of
the remaining 371 parsimony informative characters resulted
in a single tree with TL = 1443, CI = 0.5038, RI = 0.7056 and
HI = 0.4962. The overall topology of the 50 % majority-rule
consensus tree of 10 000 trees sampled during the Bayesian
analysis was similar to the MP tree. The MP tree is presented in
Fig. 1 with bootstrap support above the branches. The Bayesian
tree is available in TreeBASE (SN 3881).
RESuLTS
Phylogenetic analyses
Partial nucleotide sequences of the SSU ribosomal DNA (1134
bp), the ITS region (500–600 bp), the D1/D2 variable domains
of the LSU ribosomal DNA (614 bp), β-tubulin (approx. 400
bp) and EF1-α genes (approx. 300 bp) were determined for
several isolates. The other sequences used in the analyses
were retrieved from GenBank (Table 1). Sequences of the
five genes were aligned and analysed separately by MP and
Bayesian analyses, and the resulting trees were compared.
No conflicts were detected between single gene phylogenies
indicating that the datasets could be combined. New sequences
were deposited in GenBank (Table 1) and the alignments in
TreeBASE (SN 3881).
Dothidotthia sp. CBS119688
58
61 Dothidotthia sp. CBS119691
99
Combined SSU and LSU rDNA sequences of Dothidotthia
symphoricarpi isolates were aligned with a set of sequences
retrieved from GenBank (Table 1) representing several orders
in the Dothideomycetes, as well as two Sordariomycetes sequences that were selected as outgroup taxa (Sordaria fimicola
and Xylaria hypoxylon). The combined SSU+LSU alignment
consisted of 38 taxa and contained 1742 characters including
89
72
Dothidotthia symphoricarpi CBS119687
Didymella cucurbitacearum
97
Leptosphaeria maculans
81
Massaria platani
55
Delitschiaceae
Botryosphaeria dothidea
99
Diplodia mutila
Botryosphaeriaceae
Hysteropatella clavispora
Capnodium coffeae
100
Hysteriales
Davidiellaceae
Capnodiaceae
Mycosphaerella punctiformis
88
100
Hysteriaceae
Davidiella tassiana
81
87
Botryosphaeriales
Lasiodiplodia theobromae
Guignardia bidwelli
67
Lophiostomataceae
Testudinaceae
Dothiorella sarmentorum
57
99
95
Teichosporaceae
Neofusicoccum ribis
78
100
Melanommataceae
Pleomassariaceae
Sporormiaceae
Lophiostoma crenatum
99
Montagnulaceae
Pleomassaria siparia
Byssothecium circinans
Lepidosphaeria nicotiae
Massarinaceae
Bimuria novae zelandiae
Preussia terricola
Delitschia winteri
66
Montagnula opulenta
82
95
Massariaceae
Massarina arundinacea
98
Pleosporaceae
Pleosporales
Cochliobolus heterostrophus
97
72
Phaeosphaeriaceae
Lewia eureka
100
77
59
Leptosphaeriaceae
Phaeosphaeria avenaria
56
87
family incertae sedis
Phoma herbarum
98
98
Dothidotthiaceae
Dothidotthia sp. CBS119690
Dothidotthia sp. CBS 19686
Piedraia hortae
Elsinoë veneta
Mycosphaerellaceae
Piedraiaceae
Elsinoaceae
Myriangium duriaei
Dothidea sambuci
Dothideaceae
Dothiora cannabinae
Dothioraceae
Capnodiales
Myriangiaceae
Myriangiales
Dothideales
Xylaria hypoxylon
10
Sordaria fimicola
Fig. 1 Single most parsimonious tree resulting from maximum parsimony analysis of combined SSU and LSU sequence data for 38 taxa. MP bootstrap
values are given at the nodes.
34
Persoonia – Volume 21, 2008
Fig. 2 One of eight most parsimonious trees resulting from maximum parsimony analysis of combined SSU, LSU, ITS, β-tubulin and EF1-α sequence
data for 76 isolates in the Botryosphaeriaceae. MP bootstrap values are
given at the nodes.
D. pinea C CBS109725
D. pinea C CBS109943
D. pinea A CBS393.84
83
D. pinea A CBS109727
D. scrobiculata CBS109944
100
100 D. scrobiculata CBS113423
D. seriata CBS112555
99 D. seriata CBS119049
65
100 D. mutila CBS112553
Diplodia
100
D. mutila CBS230.30
D. rosulata CBS116470
61
100 D. rosulata CBS116472
98
100 D. cupressi CBS168.87
1
D. cupressi CBS261.85
80
“B.” tsugae CBS418.64
91
100 D. corticola CBS112549
D. corticola CBS112546
N. phoenicum CBS123168
100
N. phoenicum CBS122528
100
Neodeightonia
N. phoenicum CBS169.34
2
N. subglobosa CBS448.91
L. theobromae CBS124.13
100
L. theobromae CAA006
99
73
L. theobromae CBS164.96
100 L. pseudotheobromae CBS447.62
100
L. pseudotheobromae CBS116459
L. parva CBS356.59
87
97 L. parva CBS494.78
100 L. gonubiensis CBS115812
56
L. gonubiensis CBS116355
100
81
L. rubropurpurea CBS118740
3
L. venezuelensis CBS118739
100 L. crassispora CBS110492
L. crassispora CBS118741
P. mamane CPC12442
P. mamane CPC12443
86
P. mamane CPC12440
Phaeobotryon
100 P. mamane CPC12445
4
P. mamane CPC12444
87
P. mamane CPC12264
Physalospora fusca CBS174.26
5
Barriopsis
100
100 P. visci CBS100163
77
P. visci CBS186.97
100
P. porosa CBS110496
Phaeobotryosphaeria
6
100 P. citrigena ICMP16812
P. citrigena ICMP16818
100 B. dothidea CBS115476
100
B. dothidea CBS110302
Botryosphaeria
100 B. corticis CBS119047
B. corticis ATCC22927
73 D. iberica CBS115041
60
D. iberica CBS113188
Dothiorella sp. CAA005
D. sarmentorum CBS115038
D. acerina CBS910.73
Dothiorella
D. sarmentorum IMI63581b
96
D. coryli CBS242.51
D. juglandis CBS188.87
100
Dothiorella sp. JL599
Dothiorella sp. CAP187
98 Spencermartinsia sp. ICMP16827
98 Spencermartinsia sp. ICMP16828
78
Spencermartinsia sp. CBS500.72
Spencermartinsia
100
S. viticola CBS117006
9
S. viticola CBS117009
61
100 Spencermartinsia sp. CBS302.75
100 ICMP16819
10
Incertae sedis
ICMP16824
100 N. parvum CMW9081
70
N. parvum CBS110301
100 N. mangiferum CBS118531
Neofusicoccum
N. mangiferum CBS118532
100 N. luteum CBS110299
N. luteum CBS110497
99
Lasiodiplodia
66
100
75
7
62
100
99
100
8
100
100
11
Pseudofusicoccum stromaticum CBS117449
Pseudofusicoccum stromaticum CBS117448
10
100
35
A.J.L. Phillips et al.: Dark-spored teleomorph genera in Botryosphaeriaceae
Within the ingroup taxa six well-supported clades could be
identified, which correspond to known orders belonging to
the Dothideomycetes, namely the Dothideales, Myriangiales,
Capnodiales, Hysteriales, Botryosphaeriales and Pleosporales.
The isolates identified as D. symphoricarpi formed a distinct
and well-supported subclade (MP bootstrap = 89 %, posterior
probability = 1.00) within the Pleosporales clade. The D. sym
phoricarpi clade was clearly separated from all families included
in the analyses. In both MP and Bayesian analyses the isolates
grouped close to Didymella cucurbitacearum and Phoma her
barum (family incertae sedis; de Gruyter et al. in prep.).
The object of the multigene dataset (SSU, LSU, ITS, β-tubulin
and EF1-α) analyses was to determine the phylogenetic relationships of the species with brown ascospores. Therefore
Pseudofusicoccum stromaticum was used as outgroup because
it lies basal to the Botryosphaeriaceae (Crous et al. 2006). The
alignment of 76 isolates consisted of 3470 characters including
alignment gaps. Indels were coded separately and added to the
end of the alignment as characters 3255–3470. In the analyses,
alignment gaps were treated as missing data.
The combined dataset contained 3470 characters, of which
83 were variable and parsimony-uninformative and 2555 were
constant. Maximum parsimony analysis of the remaining 832
parsimony-informative characters resulted in eight equal, most
parsimonious trees (TL = 1966 steps, CI = 0.6175, RI = 0.9103,
RC = 0.5621, HI = 0.3825). The 50 % majority-rule consensus
tree of 10 000 trees sampled during the Bayesian analysis had
an overall topology similar to the MP trees. One of the MP trees
is shown in Fig. 2 with bootstrap support at the branches. The
Bayesian tree is available in TreeBASE (SN 3881). In both
analyses 11 clades were identified within the ingroup. For
convenience these clades are numbered 1–11 in Fig. 2. All of
the clades received high bootstrap (87–100 %) and posterior
probabilities (0.99 –1.00) support.
TAXonoMY
Position of Dothidotthia
Until now the genus Dothidotthia has been regarded as a
member of the Botryosphaeriaceae (Barr 1987). One species of Dothidotthia, D. aspera, was recently shown to have a
hyphomycetous anamorph in Thyrostroma (Ramaley 2005),
quite unlike the pycnidial anamorphs of members of the Botryosphaeriaceae. The type species of Dothidotthia, D. sym
phoricarpi, was included in an analysis of the Dothideomycetes
(Fig. 1). These data show that Dothidotthia belongs in the
Pleosporales, outside any of the known families, and thus a
new family in the Pleosporales is introduced.
Dothidotthiaceae Crous & A.J.L. Phillips, fam. nov. — MycoBank MB511706
Ascomata aggregata, erumpescentia, globosa, atrobrunnea. Pseudoparaphyses hyalinus, septatis. Asci octisporis, bitunicati, clavati. Ascosporae
brunneae, uniseptatae, ellipsoidae.
Typus. Dothidotthia Höhn.
Anamorph. Thyrostroma.
Ascomata in gregarious clusters, rarely solitary, erumpent, globose, dark brown; wall consisting of 3–6 layers of dark brown
textura angularis; basal region giving rise to dark brown, thickwalled hyphae, that extend from the bottom of the ascomata into
the substrate. Pseudoparaphyses hyaline, septate, branched
in upper part above asci. Asci 8-spored, bitunicate, sessile,
clavate, straight to curved. Ascospores brown, ellipsoid, transversely 1-septate. Anamorph hyphomycetous, Thyrostroma.
Dothidotthia Höhn., Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 36: 312. 1918
Type species. Dothidotthia symphoricarpi (Rehm) Höhn.
Dothidotthia symphoricarpi (Rehm) Höhn., Ber. Deutsch.
Bot. Ges. 36: 312. 1918. — Fig. 3–5
Basionym. Pseudotthia symphoricarpi Rehm, Ann. Mycol. 11: 169.
1913.
≡ Dibotryon symphoricarpi (Rehm) Petr., Ann. Mycol. 25: 301. 1927.
≡ Gibbera symphoricarpi (Rehm) Arx, Acta Bot. Neerl. 3: 85. 1954.
Anamorph. Thyrostroma negundinis (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) A.W. Ramaley,
Mycotaxon 94: 131. (2005) 2006.
Basionym. Coryneum negundinis Berk. & M.A. Curtis, Grevillea 2: 153.
1874.
For additional synonyms see Ramaley (2005).
Ascomata pseudothecial, in gregarious clusters, rarely solitary,
erumpent, up to 550 µm diam and 500 µm high; apex somewhat papillate to depressed; wall consisting of 3–6 layers of
dark brown textura angularis, 20–80 µm wide, giving rise to
dark brown, thick-walled hyphae, 4–6 µm wide, that extend
from the bottom of the ascomata into the substratum; reduced
to short lateral projections (10 –15 µm long) elsewhere on the
outer ascomatal wall. Pseudoparaphyses hyaline, septate,
2–3 µm wide, generally not constricted at septa, and branched
in upper part above asci. Asci 8-spored, bitunicate, sessile,
clavate, 70–120 × 15–22 µm, straight to curved. Ascospores
uniformly pale brown, (20 –)22–23(– 26) × (8 –)9–10(–11) µm,
ellipsoid, tapering towards subacutely rounded ends, medianly
1-septate, prominently constricted at septum, widest just above
septum, smooth.
Specimens examined. Dothidotthia symphoricarpi. USA, North Dakota,
on branches of Symphoricarpos occidentalis, holotype of D. symphoricarpi
herb. NY; Colorado, San Juan Co, c. 0.5 mile up Engineer Mountain Trail from
turnoff at mile 52.5, Hwy 550, dead twigs of Symphoricarpos rotundifolius,
24 June 2004, A.W. Ramaley 0410, epitype designated here as BPI 871823,
culture ex-epitype CPC 12929 = CBS 119687.
Notes — Barr (1989) introduced the combination Dothi
dotthia aspera, but incorrectly listed D. symphoricarpi as
synonym. Dothidotthia aspera (Fig. 6) has ascospores that
are ellipsoidal with rounded ends, constricted at the medium
septum, widest just above the septum, medium brown, smooth
to finely verruculose, (20 –)32 – 35(– 37) × (12 –)13 –14(–15)
µm. Ascospores of D. symphoricarpi are much smaller, namely
(20 –)22–23(– 26) × (8 –)9–10(–11) µm, ellipsoid with rounded
ends, constricted at the median septum, widest above septum,
finely verruculose, pale brown, and not medium brown as in
D. aspera. Ramaley (2005) collected several specimens in this
complex, one of which, BPI 871823, is selected to serve as
epitype of D. symphoricarpi. Given the new circumscription of
36
Persoonia – Volume 21, 2008
a
d
b
c
f
e
i
g
h
j
Fig. 3 Pseudotthia symphoricarpi holotype NY. a. Ascomata; b. immature asci; c. asci and pseudoparaphyses; d. mature ascus with pale brown 1-septate
ascospores; e. brown 1-septate ascospores; f. base of sessile ascus; g. brown 1-septate ascospores; h–j. conidia of Thyrostroma anamorph in association
with ascomata. — Scale bars: a = 500 µm; b–h = 10 µm.
37
A.J.L. Phillips et al.: Dark-spored teleomorph genera in Botryosphaeriaceae
a
c
b
d
e
Fig. 4 Dothidotthia symphoricarpi epitype BPI 871823. a. Longitudinal section through an ascoma; b. detail of a section through the ascoma wall; c, d. asci
with pale brown, 1-septate ascospores; e. pale brown, 1-septate ascospores. — Scale bars = 10 µm.
this species, the other specimens treated by Ramaley (2005)
appear to represent D. aspera, which is morphologically and
phylogenetically distinct from both D. symphoricarpi based on
the larger ascospores.
Dothidotthia aspera (Ellis & Everh.) M.E. Barr, Mycotaxon 34:
519. 1989 — Fig. 6
Basionym. Amphisphaeria aspera Ellis & Everh., Bull. Torrey Bot. Club
27: 52. 1900.
Ascomata pseudothecial, gregarious in groups, rarely solitary,
erumpent, up to 600 µm diam, 500 µm high; apex rounded,
short papillate to depressed; wall consisting of 3–6 layers of
dark brown textura angularis, 20–80 µm wide, giving rise to
dark brown, thick-walled hyphae, 4–6 µm wide, that extend
from the bottom of the ascomata into the substratum; reduced
to short lateral projections elsewhere on the outer ascomatal
wall. Pseudoparaphyses hyaline, septate, 2–3 µm wide, not
constricted at the septa, branched in the upper parts. Asci
8-spored, bitunicate, sessile, clavate, 65–140 × 10–23 µm.
Ascospores medium brown, ellipsoidal with rounded ends,
1-septate, constricted at the median septum, smooth to finely
verruculose, (20 –)32–35(– 37) × (12–)13–14(–15) µm.
Specimens examined. Dothidotthia aspera. USA, Colorado, E. Bethel
517, holotype of Amphisphaeria aspera herb. NY. – Dothidotthia spp. USA,
Colorado, Durango, 7 Animas Place, dead twigs of Euonymus alatus, 29 June
2004, A.W. Ramaley 0411, BPI 871820, culture CPC 12930 = CBS 119688;
Colorado, Durango, between Animas Place and Animas River, dead twigs
of Acer negundo, 8 July 2004, A.W. Ramaley 0414, BPI 871819, anamorph
culture CPC 12933 = CBS 119691, teleomorph CPC 12932 = CBS 119690;
Colorado, La Plata Co, c. 1.75 mile up Carbon Junction Trail, dead twigs of
Fendlera rupicola, 11 May 2004, A.W. Ramaley 0403, BPI 871821, culture
CPC 12928 = CBS 119686.
Taxonomy of species with brown ascospores in the
Botryosphaeriaceae
The multigene phylogeny revealed 11 clades within the dataset
of isolates studied (Fig. 2). Valid generic names are available and
currently in use for clade 1 (Diplodia), clade 3 (Lasiodiplodia),
38
Persoonia – Volume 21, 2008
a
b
c
d
Fig. 5 Thyrostroma sp. CBS 119691, anamorph of Dothidotthia aspera. a–d. Conidia and conidiophores. — Scale bars = 10 µm.
39
A.J.L. Phillips et al.: Dark-spored teleomorph genera in Botryosphaeriaceae
a
b
d
e
c
f
g
Fig. 6 Amphisphaeria aspera holotype NY. a. Ascomata; b, c. asci with ascospores; d. pseudoparaphyses and ascospores; e. ascospores; f. ascospore and
two conidia; g. conidia. — Scale bars: a = 500 µm ; b –g = 10 µm.
clade 7 (Botryosphaeria), clade 8 (Dothiorella) and clade 11
(Neofusicoccum). Neodeightonia and Phaeobotryon are reinstated for clades 2 and 4, respectively. Phaeobotryosphaeria
is reinstated for clade 6 and shown to be the teleomorph of
Sphaeropsis, the status of which is clarified. No generic names
are available for the remaining clades and for this reason Bar
riopsis and Spencermartinsia are introduced for clades 5 and
9, respectively. The status of clade 10 remains unresolved.
Barriopsis A.J.L. Phillips, A. Alves & Crous, gen. nov. —
MycoBank MB511712
Ascomata pseudothecia, brunnea vel nigra. Pseudoparaphyses hyalinae,
septatae. Asci clavati, stipitati, octospori, bitunicati cum loculo apicali bene
evoluto. Ascosporae ellipsoides, unicellulares, ovoidea, brunnea.
Type species. Barriopsis fusca A.J.L. Phillips, A. Alves & Crous.
Etymology. Named in honour of Margaret E. Barr, who dedicated a large
part of her career to resolving the taxonomy of the Dothideomycetes.
Ascomata pseudothecial, scattered or clustered, brown to black,
wall composed of several layers of textura angularis, ostiole
central. Pseudoparaphyses hyaline, smooth, multiseptate, constricted at septa. Asci bitunicate, clavate, stipitate, thick-walled
with thick endotunica and well-developed apical chamber.
Ascospores aseptate, ellipsoid to ovoid, brown when mature,
without terminal apiculi.
Note — The absence of apiculi differentiate this genus from
Sphaeropsis and Phaeobotryosphaeria. The aseptate, brown
ascospores without apiculi are unique in the Botryosphaeriaceae.
Barriopsis fusca (N.E. Stevens) A.J.L. Phillips, A. Alves &
Crous, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB511713; Fig. 7
Basionym. Physalospora fusca N.E. Stevens, Mycologia 18: 210. 1926.
= Phaeobotryosphaeria fusca Petr., Sydowia 6: 317. 1952.
= Botryosphaeria disrupta (Berk. & Curtis) Arx & E. Müll., Beitr. Kryptogamenfl. Schweiz 2, 1: 37. 1954.
Ascomata scattered, immersed, brown to black, separate or
aggregated, wall composed of textura angularis, uniloculate,
ostiole single, central. Pseudoparaphyses hyaline, smooth,
3–4.5 µm wide, multiseptate with septa 14–18 µm apart. Asci
bitunicate, clavate, 8-spored, stipitate, thick-walled with thick
endotunica and well-developed apical chamber, 125 –180 ×
30–36 µm. Ascospores biseriate, aseptate, ellipsoid to oval,
40
Persoonia – Volume 21, 2008
a
c
b
d
Fig. 7 Barriopsis fusca BPI 599052. a. Immature asci; b. mature asci with brown ascospores; c. ascus with ascospores; d. ascospores. — Scale bars: a, b
= 20 µm; c, d = 10 µm.
straight or slightly curved, apex and base obtuse, without
terminal apiculi, wall externally smooth, internally finely verruculose, brown, widest in the middle, (30 –)31– 36.5(– 38.5) ×
(15.5–)16–18.5(–21)
μm, 95 % confidence limits = 32.6–33.4
_
× 17.0 –17.5 µm (χ± S.D. = 33.0 ± 1.5 × 17.2 ± 1.0 µm, L/W
ratio = 1.9 ± 0.15).
Specimens examined. CUBA, Herradura, on twigs of Citrus sp., 15 Jan.
1925, N.E. Stevens, holotype BPI 599052, culture ex-type CBS 174.26.
– USA, Florida, Orlando, on twigs of Citrus sp., 20 Feb. 1923, C.L. Shear,
BPI 599054.
Notes — The ex-type culture could not be induced to sporulate, no doubt because it has been in culture for more than
80 years. According to Stevens (1926) the anamorph is lasiodiplodia-like and he described it as follows: “conidia initially
hyaline, aseptate and thick-walled becoming dark brown and
septate with irregular longitudinal striations, (20 –)23–25(– 28)
× (11–)12 –13(–16) µm”. Stevens (1926) placed this species
in Physalospora, but he was obviously hesitant to do so, judging from his statement “To place in the genus Physalospora a
fungus with coloured ascospores is of course to do violence
to the ideas of that genus”. On account of the bitunicate asci
and brown ascospores of this species, Physalospora is clearly
unsuitable. Petrak & Deighton (1952) transferred this species
to Phaeobotryosphaeria as Phaeobotryosphaeria fusca, presumably on account of its dark ascospores. We examined the
type species of Phaeobotryosphaeria (P. yerbae) and found it
to have terminal apiculi on the ascospores. Therefore, Phaeo
botryosphaeria would also appear to be unsuitable. For this
reason we propose the new genus Barriopsis for this fungus.
The brown, aseptate ascospores without terminal apiculi are
characteristic of this new genus.
41
A.J.L. Phillips et al.: Dark-spored teleomorph genera in Botryosphaeriaceae
b
a
d
e
f
c
g
j
h
i
k
l
m
n
Fig. 8 Dothiorella iberica. a–g: LISE 94944; h–n: CBS 115041. a. Vertical section through an ascoma; b. ascus with brown, 1-septate ascospores; c. immature asci and one ascus with four ascospores; d. details of ascoma wall; e. pseudoparaphyses; f. ascospores; g. ascospore; h. young conidiogenous cells;
i. conidiogenous cells with developing conidia; j, k conidia viewed at two different levels of focus to show internally verruculose wall; l, m. conidia; n. germinating
conidia. — Scale bars: a = 50 µm; b –n: 10 µm.
42
Persoonia – Volume 21, 2008
b
a
d
c
e
Fig. 9 Neodeightonia subglobosa CBS 448.91. a. Globose conidiomata; b, c. conidiogenous cells; d. hyaline conidia; e. mature brown conidia. — Scale bars:
a = 250 µm; b–e = 10 µm.
b
a
e
f
d
c
g
h
Fig. 10 Neodeightonia phoenicum CBS 122528. a. Conidiogenous layer; b–e. conidiogenous cells; f. hyaline, aseptate conidia; g, h. brown, 1-septate conidia
with longitudinal striations. — Scale bars = 10 µm.
43
A.J.L. Phillips et al.: Dark-spored teleomorph genera in Botryosphaeriaceae
Dothiorella Sacc., Michelia 2: 5. 1880
Type species. Dothiorella pyrenophora Sacc.
Dothiorella pyrenophora Sacc., Michelia 2: 5. 1880
Notes — The genus Dothiorella has been the source of
much confusion in the past and the name has been used in
more than one sense. Dothiorella has been used for anamorphs
with hyaline, aseptate conidia similar to those normally associated with Fusicoccum and Neofusicoccum. Presumably this
confusion started when Petrak (1922) transferred F. aesculi to
Dothiorella, citing the species as the conidial state of B. be
rengeriana (Sutton 1980). In later years, Dothiorella has been
used for fusicoccum-like anamorphs with multiloculate conidiomata (Grossenbacher & Duggar 1911, Barr 1987, Rayachhetry
et al. 1996). Sivanesan (1984) confused matters further by
placing Dothiorella pyrenophora in synonymy with Dothichiza
sorbi, which has small, hyaline, aseptate conidia and is the
anamorph of Dothiora pyrenophora (Fr.) Fr. However, he was
referring to Dothiorella pyrenophora Sacc. (1884), which is a
later homonym of Dothiorella pyrenophora Sacc. (1880) (Sutton
1977). The taxonomic history of Dothiorella has been explained
by Sutton (1977) and Crous & Palm (1999), and is illustrated
by Crous & Palm (1999).
Dothiorella was reduced to synonymy under Diplodia by
Crous & Palm (1999), who used a broad morphological concept for Diplodia. Phillips et al. (2005) re-examined the type
of Dothiorella pyrenophora Sacc. (K 54912) and stated that
it differed from Diplodia by having conidia that are brown and
1-septate early in their development, while they are still attached
to the conidiogenous cells. In Diplodia conidial darkening and
septation takes place after discharge from the pycnidia. Crous
et al. (2006) re-examined the types of both Diplodia and Dothio
rella and confirmed these morphological differences. Teleomorphs of Dothiorella have pigmented, septate ascospores.
Dothiorella sarmentorum (Fr.) A.J.L. Phillips, A. Alves &
J. Luque, Mycologia 97: 522. 2005
Basionym. Sphaeria sarmentorum Fr., Kongl. Vetensk. Acad. Handl., n.s.
39: 107. 1818.
≡ Diplodia sarmentorum (Fr.) Fr., Summa Veg. Scand. 2: 417. 1849.
= Diplodia pruni Fuckel, Jahrb. Nassauischen Vereins Naturk. 23–24:
169. (1869 –1870) 1870.
Teleomorph. Botryosphaeria sarmentorum A.J.L. Phillips, A. Alves &
J. Luque, Mycologia 97: 522. 2005.
Specimens examined. ENGLAND, Warwickshire, on Ulmus sp., Aug. 1956,
E.A. Ellis, holotype of Otthia spiraeae, IMI 63581b, culture ex-holotype IMI
63581b. – SWEDEN, Lund, Botanical Garden, on Menispermum canadense,
1818, E.M. Fries (holotype of Sphaeria sarmentorum) Scleromyc. Suec. 18,
isotype K(M) 104852.
Dothiorella iberica A.J.L. Phillips, J. Luque & A. Alves, Mycologia 97: 524. 2005 — Fig. 8
Teleomorph. Botryosphaeria iberica A.J.L. Phillips, J. Luque & A. Alves,
Mycologia 97: 524. 2005.
Specimens examined. SPAIN, Aragon, Tarazona, on dead twigs of Quercus
ilex, 18 Dec. 2002, J. Luque, holotype of B. iberica LISE 94944, culture extype CBS 115041, LISE 94942 = CBS 115035.
Notes — This species is similar to Dothiorella sarmentorum
but can be distinguished on characteristics of the asci, ascospores and conidia. Thus, in D. iberica the asci are shorter
and more clavate, the ascospores characteristically taper
towards the base, and on average the conidia are slightly
longer.
Within the Dothiorella clade there is a subclade consisting
of Diplodia coryli (CBS 242.51) and Diplodia juglandis (CBS
188.87). However, neither of these two isolates is authentic,
and neither could be induced to sporulate. Thus, their identity
and distinction from other species could not be determined.
Two other isolates (CAP187 from Prunus dulcis in Portugal, and
JL599 from Corylus avellana in Spain) identified as Dothiorella
spp. formed two further clades. However, these clades are represented by single isolates and were not considered any further.
Nevertheless, it is clear that Dothiorella is genetically diverse
and further collections will undoubtedly yield more species.
Neodeightonia C. Booth, Mycol. Pap. 119: 17. (1969) 1970.
Type species. Neodeightonia subglobosa C. Booth.
Neodeightonia subglobosa C. Booth, Mycol. Pap. 119: 19.
(1969) 1970.
Anamorph. Sphaeropsis subglobosa Cooke, Grevillea 7: 95. 1879, as
‘subglobosum’.
Specimens examined. SIERRA LEONE, Njala (Kori), on dead culms of
Bambusa arundinacea, 17 Aug. 1954, F.C. Deighton, holotype IMI 57769
(c). – UNKNOWN LOCATION, human, keratomycosis of eye, Aug. 1991, Kirkness,
CBS 448.91.
Note — We examined the type specimen of Neodeightonia
subglobosa and found only immature asci with hyaline ascospores. However, Punithalingam (1969) clearly described
and illustrated the ascospores as brown and 1-septate. Von Arx
& Müller (1954) transferred N. subglobosa to Botryosphaeria,
and because this is the type species of the genus, they reduced
Neodeightonia to synonymy under Botryosphaeria. However,
morphologically (based on the dark, 1-septate ascospores)
and phylogenetically, this genus is distinguishable from
Botryosphaeria, and the genus is therefore reinstated here.
Punithalingam (1969) referred to a germ slit in the conidia.
Crous et al. (2006) suggested that this is in fact a striation on
the conidial wall, and that more than one could occur per conidium, a feature confirmed in the present study (Fig. 9). Such
striate walls suggest an affinity to Lasiodiplodia. Nevertheless,
Neodeightonia can be distinguished from Lasiodiplodia by the
absence of pycnidial paraphyses. Thus, conidial striations
distinguish Neodeightonia from Diplodia, and the absence of
pycnidial paraphyses distinguishes it from Lasiodiplodia.
Neodeightonia phoenicum A.J.L. Phillips & Crous, sp. nov.
— MycoBank MB511708; Fig. 10
Conidiomata brunnea vel nigra, in contextu hospitis inclusa, multilocularia,
globosa. Cellulae conidiogenae holoblasticae, hyalinae, cylindricae, percurrenter cum 1–2 proliferationibus prolificentes, vel in plano eodem periclinaliter
incrassatae. Conidia (14.5 –)17– 21(–24) × (9 –)10–12.5(–14) µm ovoidea
vel ellipsoidea, apicibus rotundato, in fundo rotundato, parietibus crassis,
primaria hyalinae, cum maturitate brunnea, longitudinaliter striata et unum
septa formantia.
44
Persoonia – Volume 21, 2008
Anamorph. Macrophoma phoenicum Sacc., Annuario Reale Ist. Bot.
Roma 4: 195. 1890.
≡ Diplodia phoenicum (Sacc.) H.S. Fawc. & Klotz, Bull. Calif. Agric. Exp.
Station 522: 8. 1932.
≡ Strionemadiplodia phoenicum (Sacc.) Zambett., Bull. Trimestriel Soc.
Mycol. France 70: 235. (1954) 1955.
Conidiomata formed on pine needles in culture pycnidial,
multiloculate, dark brown to black, immersed in the host, becoming erumpent when mature. Conidiogenous cells hyaline,
smooth, cylindrical, swollen at base, holoblastic, proliferating
percurrently to form one or two annellations, or proliferating at
same level giving rise to periclinal thickenings. Conidia ovoid
to ellipsoid, apex and base broadly rounded, widest in middle
to upper third, thick-walled, initially hyaline and aseptate, becoming dark brown and 1-septate some time after discharge
from pycnidia, with melanin deposits on inner surface of wall
arranged longitudinally giving a striate appearance to conidia,
(14.5–)17– 21(–24) × (9–)10–12.5(–14)
μm, 95 % confidence
_
limits = 18.6 –19.5 × 11.2 –11.8 µm (χ± S.D. = 19.1 ± 1.7 × 11.5
± 1.1 µm, l/w ratio = 1.7 ± 0.2).
Specimens examined. SPAIN, Catalonia, Tarragona, Salou, on Phoenix sp.,
F. Garcia, holotype CBS H-20108, culture ex-type CBS 122528; Catalonia,
Barcelona, Vilanova i la Geltrú, on Phoenix canariensis, 17 May 2004, M. Rojo,
CBS 123168. – USA, California, on Phoenix dactylifera, Mar. 1934, H.S.
Fawcett, CBS 169.34.
a
d
b
Notes — Zambettakis (1955) placed this species in Strione
madiplodia (based on the striate conidia). However, the teleomorphic genus Neodeightonia is available for this species. The
absence of pycnidial paraphyses distinguishes Neodeightonia
from Lasiodiplodia, while the striate conidia distinguish it from
Diplodia. Although Punithalingam (1969) reported that the
teleomorph of N. subglobosa forms in culture, our isolates of
N. phoenicum failed to do so, even after long periods of incubation (> 3 mo).
Phaeobotryon Theiss. & Syd., Ann. Mycol. 13: 664. 1915
Type species. Phaeobotryon cercidis (Cooke) Theiss. & Syd.
Phaeobotryon cercidis (Cooke) Theiss. & Syd., Ann. Mycol.
13: 664. 1915. — Fig. 11
Basionym. Dothidea cercidis Cooke, Grevillea 13: 66. 1885, as ‘Dothidea
(Bagnisiella)’.
≡ Bagnisiella cercidis (Cooke) Berl. & Voglino, Add. Syll. Fung. 1–4: 223.
1886.
≡ Auerswaldia cercidis (Cooke) Theiss. & Syd., Ann. Mycol. 12: 270.
1914.
Specimen examined. USA, Carolina, on bark of Cercis canadensis, ex
Herb. MC Cooke No 795, K134204.
c
e
f
g
h
Fig. 11 Bagnisiella cercidis K 134204. a. Ascomata; b. immature ascus; c. asci with immature ascospores; d. hyaline ascospores; e–g. hyaline, aseptate
ascospores with terminal apiculi (arrows); h. broken, brown, 2-septate ascospore. — Scale bars: a = 400 µm; b–h = 10 µm.
45
A.J.L. Phillips et al.: Dark-spored teleomorph genera in Botryosphaeriaceae
a
b
c
Fig. 12 Phaeobotryon quercicola Fungi Rehnani 534 in G. a. Vertical section through an ascoma; b. immature ascus; c. mature, 2-septate brown ascospores.
— Scale bars: a = 100 µm; b, c = 10 µm.
Notes — In the original description of Dothidea cercidis,
ascospores were reported as hyaline. However, Theissen
& Sydow (1914) observed them to become brown with age,
32–38 × 12–13 µm. Subsequently Theissen & Sydow (1915)
introduced the genus Phaeobotryon Theiss. & Syd. to accommodate this species. The asci are clavate, bitunicate, approx.
150 –170 × 30–35 µm. The pseudoparaphyses are branched,
septate, constricted at septa, anastomosing, 4 – 5 µm wide.
The ascospores are ellipsoidal, initially hyaline, becoming
pale brown, turning brown at maturity, 2-septate (cells equal
in length), with a characteristic punctiform outgrowth (conical
apiculus) at each end of the spore, (27–)30–35(– 38) × (8 –)
12–14(–15) µm. The latter features, namely 2-septate, brown
ascospores with a conical apiculus at each end, are considered
characteristic for the genus.
Phaeobotryon quercicola (A.J.L. Phillips) Crous & A.J.L.
Phillips, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB511711; Fig. 12
Basionym. Botryosphaeria quercicola A.J.L. Phillips, Mycologia 97: 526.
2005 (based on Otthia quercus Fuckel, Jahrb. Nassauischen Vereins Naturk.,
23–24: 170. (1869 –1870) 1870.
Notes — As illustrated by Phillips et al. (2005), Phaeobotryon
quercicola has brown, 2-septate ascospores with a conical
apiculus at each end, thus suggesting that it would be better
accommodated in Phaeobotryon than Botryosphaeria.
10 – 23 µm apart, constricted at septa, 3 – 4 µm wide. Asci
bitunicate, 8-spored, stipitate, thick-walled with thick endotunica and well-developed apical chamber, 120 –150(– 200)
× 25–30 µm, with biseriate ascospores. Ascospores ellipsoid
to ovate, (30 –)37– 40(– 45) × (11–)13 –15(–16) µm, 2-septate,
with 3 cells of equal length, not constricted at septa, finely verruculose, widest in middle with conical apiculus at one or both
ends. Spermatogonia morphologically similar to conidiomata,
also formed in culture. Spermatia hyaline, rod-shaped with
rounded ends, 3–5 × 2 µm. Conidiomata pycnidial, ostiolate,
separate or aggregated, globose, black, immersed to erumpent,
unilocular, up to 350 µm diam; wall consisting of 4–6 layers
of brown textura angularis. Conidiogenous cells cylindrical to
doliiform, hyaline, smooth, proliferating percurrently near apex,
10–14 × 4–8 µm. Conidia ellipsoid to oblong or subcylindrical or
obovoid, brown, smooth to finely verruculose, moderately thickwalled, granular, guttulate, ends rounded, 1(– 2)-septate, base
with inconspicuous scar, slightly flattened, (30 –)35–38(– 43)
× (12 –)14–15(–16) µm.
Specimen examined. HAWAII, Manna Koa Park, Saddle Road, on stems of
Sophora chrysophylla, July 2005, W. Gams, holotype CBS H-20109, culture
ex-type–CPC 12440 = CBS 122980.
Phaeobotryosphaeria Speg., Ann. Inst. Rech. Agron. 17, 10:
120. 1908.
Type species. Phaeobotryosphaeria yerbae Speg.
Phaeobotryon mamane Crous & A.J.L. Phillips, sp. nov. —
MycoBank MB506581; Fig. 13
Phaeobotryon cercidis similis sed ascosporae majoribus, (30–)37–40(– 45)
× (11–)13 –15(–16) µm.
Anamorph. Dothiorella-like, but with up to two transverse septa.
Etymology. Named for its host, Sophora chrysophylla, which is known as
‘mamane’ in Hawaii.
Ascomata pseudothecial, dark brown to black, stromatic, globose, aggregated in botryose clusters or separate, immersed,
becoming erumpent, ostiolate, up to 350 µm diam; wall consisting of 4 – 6 cell layers of dark brown textura angularis.
Pseudoparaphyses hyaline, smooth, multiseptate, with septa
Anamorph. Sphaeropsis Sacc., Michelia 2: 105. 1880, nom. cons.
Ascomata pseudothecial, brown to black, unilocular, thickwalled. Pseudoparaphyses hyaline, septate. Asci bitunicate,
8-spored, thick-walled with thick endotunica and well-developed
apical chamber. Ascospores brown, aseptate with small apiculus at either end. Conidiomata pycnidial, eustromatic, immersed
to erumpent, thick-walled, wall composed of several layers of
dark brown textura angularis. Ostiole single, central, papillate.
Paraphyses hyaline, aseptate, thin-walled. Conidiogenous
cells hyaline, discrete, proliferating internally to form periclinal
thickenings. Conidia oval, oblong or clavate, straight, aseptate,
moderately thick-walled.
46
Persoonia – Volume 21, 2008
a
d
b
e
c
g
f
i
j
l
m
h
k
n
o
Fig. 13 Phaeobotryon mamane. a–h: CBS H-20109; i –o: CBS 122980. a–c. Asci and ascospores; d–h. ascospores with terminal apiculi (arrows); i. conidiomata forming on pine needle; j –m. conidiogenous cells with developing conidia; n. aseptate and 1-septate conidia; o. 2-septate conidium. — Scale bars:
a–h, j –o = 10 µm; i = 350 µm.
47
A.J.L. Phillips et al.: Dark-spored teleomorph genera in Botryosphaeriaceae
Phaeobotryosphaeria yerbae Speg., Ann. Inst. Rech. Agron.
17, 10: 120. 1908 — Fig. 14
Anamorph. Not reported but presumably a Sphaeropsis species.
Ascomata pseudothecial, brown to black, multiloculate, immersed, becoming erumpent, ostiolate, papillate, up to 500 µm
diam, wall composed of several layers of dark brown textura
angularis. Pseudoparaphyses hyaline, smooth, 4–6 µm wide,
multiseptate, with septa 10–18(– 22) µm apart, constricted at
septa. Asci bitunicate, clavate, 8-spored, ascospores biseriate in the ascus, stipitate, thick-walled with thick endotunica
and well-developed apical chamber, 120 –150 × 25–30 µm.
Ascospores dark brown when mature, ovoid, (32–)34–42(–48)
× (14–)16–18(–20) µm, aseptate, externally smooth, internally
a
finely verruculose, widest in middle with a hyaline apiculus at
either end.
Specimen examined. ARGENTINA, Misiones, Campo das Cuias, y San Pedro, on branches of Ilex paraguayensis, Feb. 1907, C. Spegazzini, holotype
LPS 2926.
Phaeobotryosphaeria visci (Kalchbr.) A.J.L. Phillips & Crous
comb. nov. — MycoBank MB512100; Fig. 15
Basionym. Dothidea visci Kalchbr., Hedwigia 8: 117. 1869.
≡ Phaeobotryon visci (Kalchbr.) Höhn., Sber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.naturw. kl., Abt I 128: 591. 1919.
≡ Botryosphaeria visci (Kalchbr.) Arx & E. Müll., Beitr. Kryptogamenfl.
Schweiz, Band II, Heft I: 41. 1954.
Anamorph. Sphaeropsis visci (Fr.) Sacc., Michelia 2: 105. 1880.
For synonyms see Sutton (1980).
b
e
c
d
f
Fig. 14 Phaeobotryosphaeria yerbae LPS 2926. a. Immature (left) and mature (right) asci; b. mature ascus with brown, aseptate ascospores; c. septate
pseudoparaphyses; d. dark brown, aseptate ascospores; e, f. dark brown, aseptate ascospores with apiculi. — Scale bars = 10 µm.
48
Persoonia – Volume 21, 2008
b
a
c
g
j
e
d
f
h
i
k
l
Fig. 15 Phaeobotryosphaeria visci. a–f: CWU (MYC) AS 2271; g–l: CBS 122527. a. Immature asci; b. mature ascus with brown, aseptate ascospores;
c–f. brown, aseptate ascospores with apiculi (arrows); g. conidioma formed in culture on a pine needle; h, i. conidia forming on conidiogenous cell between
paraphyses (arrows); j. developing conidia; k. paraphyses; l. conidia. — Scale bars: a, b = 20 µm; c –f, h –l = 10 µm; g = 50 µm.
49
A.J.L. Phillips et al.: Dark-spored teleomorph genera in Botryosphaeriaceae
b
a
f
d
h
g
e
c
i
j
Fig. 16 Phaeobotryosphaeria citrigena. a–g: PDD 89238; h–j: ICMP 16812. a–c. Asci with brown ascospores; d. pseudoparaphyses; e–g. brown, aseptate
ascospores with apiculi (arrows); h. conidium developing on a conidiogenous cell; i. hyaline, aseptate conidia; j. conidiomatal paraphyses. — Scale bars: a =
50 µm; b–d = 20 µm; e–j = 10 µm.
50
Persoonia – Volume 21, 2008
Ascomata pseudothecial, brown to black, uni- or multiloculate, separate, immersed, ostiolate, up to 500 µm diam, wall
composed of several layers of dark brown textura angularis.
Pseudoparaphyses hyaline, smooth, 4–6 µm wide, multiseptate, with septa 11–19(–26) µm apart, constricted at septa. Asci
bitunicate, 8-spored, ascospores biseriate in the ascus, stipitate,
thick-walled with thick endotunica and well-developed apical
chamber, 180–230 × 35–50 µm. Ascospores pale-brown when
mature, ovoid, (27.5–)31–37.5(–38.5) × (14.5–)15–19(–19.5)
μm, aseptate, externally smooth, internally finely verruculose,
widest in middle with an apiculus at either end. Conidiomata
immersed to erumpent and superficial, unilocular, up to 300 μm
wide, wall composed of dark brown textura angularis. Paraphy
ses hyaline, aseptate, up to 40 µm long and 4 µm wide with a
bulbous tip 5 µm diam. Conidiogenous cells hyaline, discrete
proliferating internally to form periclinal thickenings, (4–)8.5–11
× 4–6.5 µm. Conidia (27–)29–33(–50) × (14.5–)15.5–19(–22)
µm, oval, apex obtuse, base obtuse or truncate, moderately
thick-walled, initially hyaline, becoming brown, externally smooth,
internally finely verruculose.
‘Svjatie Gory’, Donetsk district, on branches of Viscum album, 10 Mar. 2007,
Á. Akulov, CWU (MYC) AS 2271, cultures CBS 122526, CBS 122527.
Note — Until now the connection between Phaeobotryo
sphaeria and its anamorph has not been proven. On the specimen examined here there is a Botryosphaeria-like ascomycete
with brown ascospores. Single ascospore isolations from this
specimen resulted in cultures of S. visci, thus proving the connection between the two states. Features that distinguish this
teleomorph from others with brown ascospores in the Botryosphaeriaceae are the aseptate ascospores with an apiculus
at either end.
Phaeobotryosphaeria citrigena A.J.L. Phillips, P.R. Johnst. &
Pennycook, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB511714; Fig. 16
Phaeobotryosphaeria visci similis sed ascosporae rufus-brunneae, et conidiae minoribus, (27–)28–33(– 34) × (14.5–)15–18.5(–19) µm.
Anamorph. Sphaeropsis sp.
Etymology. Named for its association with Citrus.
Specimens examined. GERMANY, Klein Ziethen, near Angermünde, on
fallen twigs of Viscum album, 22 July 1996, T. Graefenhan, CBS 186.97.
– LUXEMBOURG, Weilenbach, near Echternach, on fallen twigs of Viscum album,
14 June 1997, H.A. van der Aa, CBS 100163. – UKRAINE, National Nature Park
a
Ascomata pseudothecial, brown to black, separate or aggregated, immersed, becoming erumpent, ostiolate, wall composed
of several layers of dark brown textura angularis. Pseudopara
b
c
e
d
f
g
h
Fig. 17 Phaeobotryosphaeria porosa CBS 110496. a. Pycnidium with elongated neck; b. conidium developing between paraphyses; c. paraphyses; d. conidia
and conidiogenous cells; e, f. immature conidium at two different levels of focus to show pores in the conidium wall; g, h. mature conidium at two different levels
of focus to show verruculose inner surface of the wall. — Scale bars: a = 500 µm, b–h = 10 µm.
A.J.L. Phillips et al.: Dark-spored teleomorph genera in Botryosphaeriaceae
physes hyaline, smooth, 4–6 µm wide, multiseptate, with septa
11–26 µm apart; constricted at septa. Asci bitunicate, 8-spored,
stipitate, thick-walled with thick endotunica and well-developed
apical chamber, 180 – 230 × 35 – 43(– 50) µm, with biseriate
ascospores. Ascospores reddish brown when mature, ellipsoid
to ovoid with both ends rounded, (27.5 –)29 – 37.5(– 38.5) ×
(14.5–)15.5–18(–19.5) µm, with an apiculus at either end, aseptate, externally smooth, internally finely verruculose, widest
in middle to upper third. Conidiomata immersed to erumpent
and superficial, unilocular, up to 500 μm wide, wall composed
of several layers of dark brown textura angularis. Paraphyses
hyaline, aseptate, up to 25 µm long and 3–3.5 µm wide. Co
nidiogenous cells hyaline, discrete, proliferating internally to
form periclinal thickenings, 8–11 × 4–6.5 µm. Conidia (27–)
28–33(– 34) × (14.5–)15–18.5(–19) µm, oval, apex obtuse,
base obtuse or truncate, moderately thick-walled, initially
hyaline, becoming brown, externally smooth, internally finely
verruculose, aseptate.
Specimens examined. NEW ZEALAND, Northland, Kerikeri, Davies Orchard
(#2), Inlet Road, on recently dead bark-covered twigs of Citrus sinensis, 6
Sept. 2006, S.R. Pennycook, P.R. Johnston & B.C. Paulus, holotype PDD
89238, culture ex-type ICMP 16812; Northland, Kerikeri, Davies Orchard
(#3), Inlet Road, on recently dead bark-covered twigs of Citrus sinensis, 6
Sept. 2006, S.R. Pennycook, P.R. Johnston & B.C. Paulus, PDD 89239,
culture ICMP 16818.
Notes — Conidia of P. citrigena remained hyaline for long
periods and only rarely did we observe dark conidia. Conidial
dimensions of this species are similar to S. visci, but its ascospores are reddish brown in contrast to the pale brown ones
of S. visci.
Phaeobotryosphaeria porosa (Van Niekerk & Crous) Crous &
A.J.L. Phillips, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB511715; Fig. 17
Basionym. Diplodia porosum Van Niekerk & Crous, Mycologia 96: 790.
2004.
Specimen examined. SOUTH AFRICA, Western Cape Province, Stellenbosch, on shoots of Vitis vinifera, 2002, J.M. van Niekerk, holotype CBS
H-12039, culture ex-type CBS 110496.
Notes — Van Niekerk et al. (2004) did not mention pycnidial
paraphyses, but these were clearly seen when these isolates
were re-examined (Fig. 17). This species is unique within the
Botryosphaeriaceae because of its large, thick-walled conidia
with large pores (1 µm wide) that are clearly visible by light
microscopy. However, the pitted walls, although unique and
distinctive, should be regarded as informative at the species
level in the same way that this character was regarded in the
original description.
Spencermartinsia A.J.L. Phillips, A. Alves & Crous, gen. nov.
— MycoBank MB511762.
Ascomata pseudothecia, ostiolati. Asci bitunicati, octo-spori, clavati, stipitati,
pseudoparaphysibus multis filiformibus, septatis, latis interspersi. Ascosporae
biseriati, uniseptati cum terminali apiculi. Conidiomata stromatiformia.
Cellulae conidiogenae holoblasticase, proliferatione percurrenti, ut videtur
annellationibus, vel inplano eodem periclinaliter incrassate. Conidia brunnea, uniseptata.
51
Type species. Spencermartinsia viticola (A.J.L. Phillips & J. Luque) A.J.L.
Phillips, A. Alves & Crous.
Etymology. Named in honour of Prof. dr Isabel Spencer-Martins, founder
of the Centro de Recursos Microbiológicos in Portugal.
Ascomata pseudothecial, ostiolate. Pseudoparaphyses thinwalled, hyaline, septate, constricted at septa. Asci bitunicate,
8-spored, clavate, stipitate, developing amongst thin-walled,
septate pseudoparaphyses, with biseriate ascospores. Asco
spores hyaline when young, brown when mature, uniseptate
with an apiculus at each end. Conidiomata stromatic. Conidio
genous cells lining inner surface of conidiomata, holoblastic,
proliferating internally producing periclinal thickenings, or proliferating percurrently to form annellations. Conidia brown,
1-septate.
Note — Spencermartinsia differs from Dothiorella in having
2-celled ascospores with an apiculus at either end of the ascospores.
Spencermartinsia viticola (A.J.L. Phillips & J. Luque) A.J.L.
Phillips, A. Alves & Crous, comb. nov. — MycoBank
MB511763; Fig. 18
Basionym. Botryosphaeria viticola A.J.L. Phillips & J. Luque, Mycologia
97: 1116. (2005) 2006.
Anamorph. Dothiorella viticola A.J.L. Phillips & J. Luque, Mycologia 97:
1116. (2005) 2006.
Specimens examined. SPAIN, Catalonia, Vimbodí, near the Monastery of
Poblet, on pruned canes of Vitis vinifera cv. Garnatxa Negra, 12 Aug. 2004,
J. Luque & S. Martos, holotype LISE 95177, culture ex-type CBS 117009;
ditto, 28 May 2003, J. Luque & Mateu, LISE 95178, culture CBS 117006.
Notes — The ex-type isolate of Spencermartinsia viticola
(CBS 117009) clustered with an isolate previously identified
as Diplodia spegazziniana (CBS 302.75). The latter isolate
is misidentified and is not representative of this species. An
additional isolate originally identified by Luque et al. (2005) as
B. viticola (CBS 117006), exhibited some differences in culture
morphology from the ex-type strain and other strains (Luque
et al. 2005). For example, the reverse side of cultures of CBS
117006 became red-brown after 3–5 d on PDA at 25 °C with
a progressive darkening of the pigment after 6–10 d. Furthermore, there were some differences in ITS and EF1-α sequences
between CBS 117006 and CBS 117009 (one substitution and
one deletion in ITS and nine substitutions in EF1-α). Although
these morphological and phylogenetic differences may reflect
species differences, no name was applied to CBS 117006
because only one isolate was available for study.
Also contained within Spencermartinsia was a single isolate
of ‘Diplodia’ medicaginis (CBS 500.72), which formed a unique
clade. Again, only a single isolate was available, the name of
which is unresolved. Isolates ICMP 16827 and ICMP 16828
from Citrus sinensis in New Zealand formed another subclade,
and thus would be regarded as a distinct phylogenetic species.
However, neither of the isolates could be induced to sporulate,
and no morphological data are available. Therefore, no names
will be applied until their morphology can be determined.
Isolates ICMP 16819 and ICMP 16824, also from Citrus
sinensis in New Zealand, formed a sister clade to Spencer
martinsia that was supported by a high MP bootstrap value
52
Persoonia – Volume 21, 2008
a
b
e
c
f
i
d
g
h
j
k
Fig. 18 Spencermartinsia viticola. a–h: LISE95177; i –k: CBS 117009. a. Ascomata erumpent through host bark; b. ascoma cut through horizontally showing
the white contents with dark spots corresponding to asci with ascospores; c. vertical section through an ascoma; d. septate pseudoparaphyses; e. clavate
ascus containing eight biseriate, dark brown, 1-septate ascospores; f. ascospores; g. ascospores with small rounded apiculi (arrows); h. conidiomata partially
erumpent through the host bark; i. conidiogenous cells; j. conidiogenous cells with annellations. The cell on the right has a dark brown, 1-septate conidium
attached; k. conidia. — Scale bars: a, h = 500 µm; b = 250 µm; c = 50 µm; d–g, i –k = 10 µm.
A.J.L. Phillips et al.: Dark-spored teleomorph genera in Botryosphaeriaceae
(100 %). Neither of these two isolates has been induced to
sporulate. In view of the lack of morphological data, the status
of these two isolates remains uncertain.
dISCuSSIon
In this paper the phylogenetic position and taxonomy of species
of Botryosphaeriaceae with brown ascospores were studied.
The taxonomic position of Dothidotthia was resolved, and within
the Botryosphaeriaceae we recognise a number of genera with
brown ascospores. For some of these genera we reinstate old
names, while others are described as new. In keeping with the
proposal to use a single name for pleomorphic fungi (Rossman & Samuels 2005) we propose a single generic name for
each clade. For example, since Dothidotthia was shown to
fall in the Pleosporales, this name is no longer available for
the teleomorph of Dothiorella, and therefore we propose that
the anamorph genus name, Dothiorella, be used for both the
anamorph and the teleomorph of this clade.
Within the Botryosphaeriaceae, species with brown ascospores
are found in three separate lineages, which lead to at least six
genera. These lineages are dispersed randomly in different
branches of the phylogenetic tree. Considering that brown
ascospores are a common feature in other families in the
Dothideomycetes (von Arx & Müller 1954, 1975), it is possible
that this character has been retained in these lineages from
the ancestors of the family, rather than being a character that
has evolved at different times.
Other morphological features that were used to differentiate
genera were the presence or absence of apiculi on ascospores,
septation of ascospores, striations on conidia, and the presence or absence of paraphyses in conidiomata. It is interesting
to note that striations are strongly developed in Lasiodiplodia,
weaker in Neodeightonia and absent from Diplodia. Furthermore, conidiomatal paraphyses are found in Lasiodiplodia but
are absent from Neodeightonia and Diplodia.
Two of the lineages with brown ascospores lie within a clade that
was previously regarded to contain species with Lasiodiplodia
and Diplodia anamorphs (Crous et al. 2006). In their phylogenetic study (Crous et al. 2006), based on LSU sequences, this
clade could not be resolved. In the present study it could be
resolved only by combining sequences of two protein coding
genes with sequences of three ribosomal genes. In this way
this clade was resolved into six genera, four of which have
dark ascospores.
One lineage (clade 2, Fig. 2) clustered between Diplodia
and Lasiodiplodia. The name Neodeightonia already exists
for this genus and it is reinstated in this paper. This genus
was introduced by Booth (in Punithalingam 1969) for a single
species, namely N. subglobosa. Von Arx & Müller (1975)
transferred this species to Botryosphaeria within their broad
concept of the genus. When Crous et al. (2006) reassessed
Botryosphaeria, reducing it to B. corticis and B. dothidea, their
isolate of B. subglobosa resided in an unresolved clade consisting of Diplodia, Lasiodiplodia and Tiarosporella. From the
data presented here it is clear that Neodeightonia subglobosa,
type of Neodeightonia, is phylogenetically and morphologically
53
distinct from other genera in the Botryosphaeriaceae. Diplodia
phoenicum was shown to be another species in this genus.
Rather than introduce a new anamorph genus to accommodate
Diplodia phoenicum we followed the procedures suggested by
Rossman & Samuels (2005) and used the teleomorph genus
name for this species. Conidia of both N. subglobosa and
N. phoenicum have striations on the conidial wall similar to
those seen in Lasiodiplodia, albeit somewhat less distinct. However, anamorphs of Neodeightonia do not have paraphyses,
which are typical of Lasiodiplodia, and the striate conidial wall
distinguishes Neodeightonia from Diplodia.
A second lineage, basal to Diplodia, Lasiodiplodia and Neo
deightonia, was resolved into three clades (clades 4–6) that
could be distinguished from one another on the morphology of
the teleomorphs, especially septation of the ascospores and
the presence or absence of ascospore apiculi. These genera
can also be differentiated on morphology of the anamorphs.
Phaeobotryon is available for one of these clades, Phaeobot
ryosphaeria for another, but as far as we could tell, no suitable names are available for the third one, and Barriopsis is
introduced to accommodate Physalospora fusca, which has
aseptate ascospores without apiculi. Von Arx & Müller (1954,
1975) placed Phaeobotryon in synonymy with Botryosphaeria.
However, as determined here, Phaeobotryon is morphologically and phylogenetically distinct from all the other genera we
studied. For this reason we have reinstated the generic name
Phaeobotryon for isolate CBS 122980, and for other isolates
in the same clade. The 1–2-septate ascospores of these fungi
with an apiculus at either end correspond with Bagnisiella cer
cidis K134204, which is the basionym of Phaeobotryon cercidis
and type species of the genus Phaeobotryon. Ascospores of
the isolates from Sophora chrysophylla are larger than P. cer
cidis and for this reason these isolates were described as a
new species. Although Von Arx & Müller (1954) considered
Phaeobotryosphaeria a synonym of Botryosphaeria, in this
study we show that it is morphologically and phylogenetically
distinct from the other two genera in this clade and the name
is reinstated for species with brown, aseptate ascospores with
terminal apiculi.
The anamorph of Phaeobotryosphaeria was shown to correspond to Sphaeropsis. Although we have adopted to follow the
system of one name for one genus, it is important to clarify some
of the controversy surrounding the genus Sphaeropsis. This genus has been the subject of considerable debate, much of which
has revolved around the question of a suitable genus name for
the pine pathogen sometimes referred to as Sphaeropsis sap
inea. The main point of debate has been whether this species
should revert to its older name of Diplodia pinea or whether
it should remain in Sphaeropsis. From the literature it seems
that this species has been regarded as typical of the genus
Sphaeropsis, both morphologically and phylogenetically. For
example, the phylogenetic studies of Jacobs & Rehner (1998)
and Denman et al. (2000) placed Sphaeropsis sapinea in the
Diplodia clade, which prompted Denman et al. (2000) to suggest
that Sphaeropsis is a synonym of Diplodia. This decision was
also supported by subsequent studies (Zhou & Stanosz 2001,
Alves et al. 2004). When Sutton (1980) stated that percurrently
proliferating conidiogenous cells are a feature of Sphaeropsis
54
that are not found in Diplodia it is not clear if he was referring to
S. visci or S. pinea. Nevertheless, Denman et al. (2000) referred
to percurrent proliferations in Diplodia, further confirming their
suggestion that Sphaeropsis is a synonym of Diplodia. Phillips
(2002) and Alves et al. (2004) confirmed that this type of conidiogenesis occurs in Diplodia mutila. However, it is important to
point out that when Saccardo (1880) established Sphaeropsis
for species of Diplodia with dark conidia, he cited S. visci as
the type species. We examined a number of strains isolated
from Viscum album that correlate in all ways with the original
description of S. visci and could find only internal proliferation of
the conidiogenous cells, resulting in periclinal thickenings and
typical phialides (sensu Sutton 1980). Moreover, this was the
only type of conidiogenesis that we could detect in the other
species that we consider to belong in Sphaeropsis (D. poro
sum and S. citrigena). As we illustrate here, the anamorphs of
Sphaeropsis are morphologically (pycnidial paraphyses) and
phylogenetically distinct from Diplodia. Thus, as revealed by the
phylogeny presented here, Sphaeropsis, typified by S. visci, is
a valid and distinct genus. Moreover, the pine pathogen often
referred to as S. sapinea resides in Diplodia.
The other species in Phaeobotryosphaeria deserve some mention. Phaeobotryosphaeria porosa is distinct in the large pits in
the conidial wall. When this species was described from grapevines in South Africa (van Niekerk et al. 2004) it was placed
in Diplodia, although the authors suggested that its unique
conidial morphology might necessitate a new genus. At that
time Sphaeropsis was not clearly defined and indeed had been
suggested as being a synonym of Diplodia. Despite the unique
character of conidial pits, D. porosum has features that place
it within the morphological concept of Phaeobotryosphaeria.
These features include relatively large, thick-walled conidia,
phialidic conidiogenous cells with periclinal thickenings, and
pycnidial paraphyses. Phylogenetically (Fig. 2) it also falls within
Phaeobotryosphaeria. Thus, it seems that conidial pits are of
taxonomic significance at species level only, in the same way
as they were regarded when this species was first described by
van Niekerk et al. (2004). Finally, a third species is described
in Phaeobotryosphaeria, namely P. citrigena from dead citrus
twigs in New Zealand.
The third lineage (clades 8–10) is sister to Neofusicoccum, and
the name Dothiorella has been used for the anamorphs of these
species. This lineage was resolved into at least two, possibly
three genera. Clades 8 and 9 could be distinguished from one
another on the morphology of their ascospores. No teleomorph
is yet known for clade 10. Dothiorella is already available for
clade 8, and a new genus Spencermartinsia is introduced for
clade 9. Dothiorella is based on D. pyrenophora, but no cultures are available for this species. When Phillips et al. (2005)
reinstated Dothiorella, they determined that D. sarmentorum
corresponded in all ways with the concept for this genus.
A clade sister to Dothiorella was composed of two subclades
(clades 9 and 10). It is not entirely clear if these two clades
represent two genera or a single genus. Spencermartinsia
viticola was considered to be a species of Dothiorella by Luque
et al. (2005), who pointed out that some morphological aspects
of the anamorph (colony morphology) differentiated this species from others in Dothiorella. A more detailed examination of
Persoonia – Volume 21, 2008
this species revealed that the ascospores bear an apiculus at
either end. This feature, together with the phylogenetic difference indicates that this clade represents another genus closely
related to Dothiorella, and for which we introduce the name
Spencermartinsia. The distinct apiculi differentiate this genus
from Dothiorella, and for this reason we propose it as a new
genus. This clade (9) is phylogenetically diverse and appears to
be composed of several species. The type species (S. viticola)
is represented in Fig. 2 by the ex-type culture of Do. viticola
(CBS 1187009). Another isolate with this name (CBS 117006)
resides in a separate clade, and thus probably represents
another species. Since we have only a single example of this
species we decline at this stage to apply a species name to
it. Similarly, CBS 500.72 (D. medicaginis) is another distinct
species represented by a single isolate, which we also decline
to name. The two isolates from Citrus (ICMP 16827 and ICMP
16828) did not sporulate in culture during the course of this
work and thus cannot be fully characterised. Nevertheless,
they too represent a third species in Spencermartinsia. The
conidia from which these isolates were grown match closely
those illustrated by Gure et al. (2005) from an isolate from
Podocarpus falcatus seeds, which these authors referred to
Dothiorella. We are continuing to study these isolates with the
aim of applying species epithets.
Isolates ICMP 16819 and ICMP 16824 form a further clade
(clade 10). These isolates were grown from 1-septate, dark
brown, striate conidia collected from twigs of Citrus. The
conidia become pigmented and septate while still attached
to the conidiogenous cell, a characteristic of Dothiorella and
Spencermartinsia. This fungus failed to sporulate in culture,
and has yet to be linked to a teleomorph. For this reason we
were unable to determine if these two isolates form a distinct
genus and such a decision will have to wait until more isolates
in this clade have been studied.
Acknowledgements This work was financed by the European Regional
Development Fund and Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT)
under project POCI/AGR/56140/2004. A. Alves was supported by grant No.
SFRH/BPD/24509/2005 from FCT, and a visit to CBS by a SYNTHESIS
grant (No. NL-TAF-1876). A. Phillips was supported by grant No. SFRH/
BCC/15810/2006 from FCT. J. Luque (IRTA, Barcelona, Spain) kindly supplied isolates of Diplodia phoenicum. Prof. Antonio Graniti, Università di
Bari, Italy helped trace the original description of Macrophoma phoenicum.
The various herbaria cited are acknowledged for making material available
for study.
REFEREnCES
Alfaro ME, Zoller S, Lutzoni F. 2003. Bayes or Bootstrap? A simulation study
comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Molecular
Biology and Evolution 20: 255 –266.
Alves A, Correia A, Luque J, Phillips AJL. 2004. Botryosphaeria corticola,
sp. nov. on Quercus species, with notes and description of Botryosphaeria
stevensii and its anamorph, Diplodia mutila. Mycologia 96: 598 –613.
Alves A, Correia A, Phillips AJL. 2006. Multi-gene genealogies and morphological data support Diplodia cupressi sp. nov., previously recognized as
D. pinea f. sp. cupressi, as a distinct species. Fungal Diversity 23: 1–15.
Alves A, Crous PW, Correia A, Phillips AJL. 2008. Morphological and molecular data reveal cryptic species in Lasiodiplodia theobromae. Fungal
Diversity 28: 1–13.
A.J.L. Phillips et al.: Dark-spored teleomorph genera in Botryosphaeriaceae
Alves A, Phillips AJL, Henriques I, Correia A. 2005. Evaluation of amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA) as a method for the identification
of Botryosphaeria species. FEMS Microbiology Letters 245: 221– 229.
Arx JA von, Müller E. 1954. Die Gattungen der amerosporen Pyrenomyceten.
Beiträge zur Kryptogamenflora der Schweiz 11: 1– 434.
Arx JA von, Müller E. 1975. A re-evaluation of the bitunicate ascomycetes
with keys to families and genera. Studies in Mycology 9: 1–159.
Barr ME. 1987. Prodromus to Class Loculoascomycetes. Amherst, Massachusetts: Published by the author.
Barr ME. 1989. The genus Dothidotthia (Botryosphaeriaceae) in North America. Mycotaxon 34: 517– 526.
Burgess TI, Barber PA, Mohali S, Pegg G, Beer W de, Wingfield MJ. 2006.
Three new Lasiodiplodia spp. from the tropics, recognized based on DNA
sequence comparisons and morphology. Mycologia 98: 423 –435.
Carbone I, Kohn LM. 1999. A method for designing primer sets for speciation
studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 91: 553 –556.
Crous PW, Palm ME. 1999. Reassessment of the anamorph genera Botryodiplodia, Dothiorella and Fusicoccum. Sydowia 52: 167–175.
Crous PW, Slippers B, Wingfield MJ, Rheeder J, Marasas WFO, Phillips AJL,
Alves A, Burgess T, Barber P, Groenewald JZ. 2006. Phylogenetic lineages
in the Botryosphaeriaceae. Studies in Mycology 55: 235 –253.
Damm U, Crous PW, Fourie PH. 2007. Botryosphaeriaceae as potential
pathogens of Prunus in South Africa, with descriptions of Diplodia africana
and Lasiodiplodia plurivora sp. nov. Mycologia 99: 664 –680.
Denman S, Crous PW, Taylor JE, Kang J-C, Pascoe I, Wingfield MJ. 2000.
An overview of the taxonomic history of Botryosphaeria, and a re-evaluation
of its anamorphs based on morphology and ITS rDNA phylogeny. Studies
in Mycology 45: 129 –140.
Glass NL, Donaldson GC. 1995. Development of primer sets designed for use
with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61: 1323 –1330.
Grossenbacher JG, Duggar BM. 1911. A contribution to the life-history,
parasitism and biology of Botryosphaeria ribis. New York Agricultural
Experimental Station, Technical Bulletin 18: 113–190.
Gure A, Slippers B, Stenlid J. 2005. Seed-borne Botryosphaeria spp. from
native Prunus and Podocarpus trees in Ethiopia, with a description of
the anamorph Diplodia rosulata sp. nov. Mycological Research 109:
1005 –1014.
Hillis DM, Bull JJ. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for
assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42:
182 –192.
Jacobs KA, Rehner SA. 1998. Comparison of cultural and morphological
characters and ITS sequences in anamorphs of Botryosphaeria and related
taxa. Mycologia 90: 601– 610.
Luque J, Martos S, Phillips AJL. 2005. Botryosphaeria viticola sp. nov. on
grapevines: a new species with a Dothiorella anamorph. Mycologia 97:
1111–1121.
Miller AN, Huhndorf SM. 2004. Using phylogenetic species recognition to delimit species boundaries within Leptosphaeria. Mycologia 96: 1106–1127.
Niekerk JM van, Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Fourie PH, Halleen F. 2004.
DNA phylogeny, morphology and pathogenicity of Botryosphaeria species
on grapevines. Mycologia 96: 781–798.
O’Donnell K. 1993. Fusarium and its near relatives. In: Reynolds DR, Taylor
JW (eds), The fungal holomorph: Mitotic, meiotic and pleomorphic speciation in fungal systematics: 225 –233. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
Page RD. 1996. TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees
on personal computers. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 12:
357– 358.
Pavlic D, Slippers B, Coutinho TA, Gryzenhout M, Wingfield MJ. 2004. Lasiodiplodia gonubiensis sp. nov., a new Botryosphaeria anamorph from native
Syzygium cordatum in South Africa. Studies in Mycology 50: 313 –322.
Petrak F. 1922. Beiträge zur kenntnis der Piltzflora der südlichen Alpenländer
und Norditaliens. Annales Mycologici editi in notitam scientiae mycologicae
universalis 20: 126 –159.
55
Petrak F, Deighton FC. 1952. Beiträge zur Pilzeflora von Sierra Leone.
Sydowia 6: 309 –322.
Phillips AJL. 2002. Botryosphaeria species associated with diseases of
grapevines in Portugal. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 41: 3 –18.
Phillips AJL, Alves A, Correia A, Luque J. 2005. Two new species of Botryosphaeria with brown, 1-septate ascospores and Dothiorella anamorphs.
Mycologia 97: 513 –529.
Punithalingam E. 1969. Studies on Sphaeropsidales in culture. Mycological
Papers 119: 1– 24.
Ramaley AW. 2005. The connection of Dothidotthia aspera (Botryosphaeriaceae) to a hyphomycetous anamorphic fungus, Thyrostroma negundinis.
Mycotaxon 94: 127–132.
Rannala B, Yang Z. 1996. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: a new method of phylogenetic inference. Journal of Molecular
Evolution 43: 304 –311.
Rayachhetry MB, Blakeslee GM, Webb RS, Kimbrough JW. 1996. Characteristics of the Fusicoccum anamorph of Boryosphaeria ribis, a potential
biological control agent for Melaleuca quinquernervia in South Florida.
Mycologia 88: 239 –248.
Rodriguez F, Oliver JF, Marin A, Medina JR. 1990. The general stochastic
model of nucleotide substitutions. Journal of Theoretical Biology 142:
485–501.
Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572 –1574.
Rossman AY, Samuels GJ. 2005. Towards a single scientific name for species
of fungi. Inoculum 56: 3–6.
Saccardo PA. 1877. Fungi Veneti novi vel critici vel Mycologiae Venetae
addendi. Michelia 1: 1–72.
Saccardo PA. 1880. Fungi gallici, ser. II. Michelia 2: 38 –135.
Schoch CL, Shoemaker RA, Seifert KA, Hambleton S, Spatafora JW, Crous
PW. 2006. A multigene phylogeny of the Dothideomycetes using four
nuclear loci. Mycologia 98: 1041–1052.
Sivanesan A. 1984. The bitunicate ascomycetes and their anamorphs.
Cramer, Vaduz, Liechtenstein.
Stevens NE. 1926. Two species of Physalospora on Citrus and other hosts.
Mycologia 18: 206 –217.
Sutton BC. 1977. Coelomycetes. IV. Nomenclature of generic names proposed for Coelomycetes. Mycological Papers 141: 1– 253.
Sutton BC. 1980. The Coelomycetes, Fungi imperfecti with acervuli, pycnidia
and stromata. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew, UK.
Swofford DL. 2003. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and
other methods) Version 4. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
Theissen F, Sydow H. 1914. Dothideazeen studien II. Annales Mycologici
12: 268 –281.
Theissen F, Sydow H. 1915. Die Dothideales. Annales Mycologici 13: 149–
746.
Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. 1997.
The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence
alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleaic Acids Research 25:
4876 –4882.
White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing
of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand
DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds), PCR Protocols: a guide to methods and
applications: 315 –322. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
Young ND, Healey J. 2003. GapCoder automates the use of indel characters
in phylogenetic analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 4: art. 6.
Zambettakis CE. 1955. Recherches anatomiques et biologiques sur les
Sphaeropsidales Phaeodidymae des Fungi imperfecti. Archives du Museum
National Histoire Naturelle (Paris) 7: 7–145.
Zhou S, Stanosz GR. 2001. Primers for amplification of mt SSU rDNA, and
a phylogenetic study of Botryosphaeria and associated anamorphic fungi.
Mycological Research 105: 1033 –1044.