Academia.eduAcademia.edu
This art icle was downloaded by: [ Universit y of Tennessee, Knoxville] On: 31 Oct ober 2014, At : 13: 56 Publisher: Taylor & Francis I nform a Lt d Regist ered in England and Wales Regist ered Num ber: 1072954 Regist ered office: Mort im er House, 37- 41 Mort im er St reet , London W1T 3JH, UK Systematics and Biodiversity Publicat ion det ails, including inst ruct ions f or aut hors and subscript ion inf ormat ion: ht t p: / / www. t andf online. com/ loi/ t sab20 Crassisporium and Romagnesiella: two new genera of dark-spored Agaricales a b c a P. Brandon Mat heny , Pierre-Art hur Moreau , Alf redo Vizzini , Emma Harrower , Andre De d e Haan , Marco Cont u & Mariano Curt i f a Depart ment of Ecology and Evolut ionary Biology, Hesler 332, Universit y of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-1610, USA b Facult é des Sciences Pharmaceut iques et Biologiques, Universit é Lille Nord de France, F-59006 Lille, France c Dipart iment o di Scienze della Vit a e Biologia dei Sist emi, Universit à di Torino, Viale Mat t ioli 25, 10125 Torino, It aly d Leopoldst raat 20/ 3, B-2850 Boom, Belgium e Via Marmilla12, I-07026 Olbia, It aly f Via Tit o Nicolini 12, I-02030 Pozzaglia Sabina, It aly Published online: 30 Oct 2014. To cite this article: P. Brandon Mat heny, Pierre-Art hur Moreau, Alf redo Vizzini, Emma Harrower, Andre De Haan, Marco Cont u & Mariano Curt i (2014): Crassisporium and Romagnesiella: t wo new genera of dark-spored Agaricales, Syst emat ics and Biodiversit y, DOI: 10. 1080/ 14772000. 2014. 967823 To link to this article: ht t p: / / dx. doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 14772000. 2014. 967823 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTI CLE Taylor & Francis m akes every effort t o ensure t he accuracy of all t he inform at ion ( t he “ Cont ent ” ) cont ained in t he publicat ions on our plat form . However, Taylor & Francis, our agent s, and our licensors m ake no represent at ions or warrant ies what soever as t o t he accuracy, com plet eness, or suit abilit y for any purpose of t he Cont ent . Any opinions and views expressed in t his publicat ion are t he opinions and views of t he aut hors, and are not t he views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of t he Cont ent should not be relied upon and should be independent ly verified wit h prim ary sources of inform at ion. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, act ions, claim s, proceedings, dem ands, cost s, expenses, dam ages, and ot her liabilit ies what soever or howsoever caused arising direct ly or indirect ly in connect ion wit h, in relat ion t o or arising out of t he use of t he Cont ent . This art icle m ay be used for research, t eaching, and privat e st udy purposes. Any subst ant ial or syst em at ic reproduct ion, redist ribut ion, reselling, loan, sub- licensing, syst em at ic supply, or dist ribut ion in any form t o anyone is expressly forbidden. Term s & Condit ions of access and use can be found at ht t p: / / www.t andfonline.com / page/ t erm s- and- condit ions Systematics and Biodiversity (2014) Research Article Crassisporium and Romagnesiella: two new genera of dark-spored Agaricales Downloaded by [University of Tennessee, Knoxville] at 13:56 31 October 2014 P. BRANDON MATHENY1*, PIERRE-ARTHUR MOREAU2, ALFREDO VIZZINI3, EMMA HARROWER1, ANDRE DE HAAN4, MARCO CONTU5 & MARIANO CURTI6 1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Hesler 332, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-1610, USA Faculte des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Universite Lille Nord de France, F-59006 Lille, France 3 Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e Biologia dei Sistemi, Universita di Torino, Viale Mattioli 25, 10125 Torino, Italy 4 Leopoldstraat 20/3, B-2850 Boom, Belgium 5 Via Marmilla12, I-07026 Olbia, Italy 6 Via Tito Nicolini 12, I-02030 Pozzaglia Sabina, Italy 2 (Received 2 February 2014; accepted 5 August 2014) A systematic study of a rare and enigmatic European species, Galerina clavus Romagn., is presented. Phylogenetic analyses show it to be most closely related to Pachylepyrium carbonicola (A.H. Sm.) Singer and P. funariophilum (M.M. Moser) Singer (Strophariaceae). Investigation of additional species of Pachylepyrium suggests this genus is polyphyletic as the type species, P. fulvidula (Singer) Singer, is nested in the Tubariaceae Vizzini based on multigene phylogenetic analyses. Pachylepyrium nubicola Singer is allied with Pholiota (Fr.) P. Kumm. based on high ITS similarity, and P. carbonicola and P. funariophilum, together with G. clavus, form a clade among a consortium of Strophariaceae Singer & A.H. Sm. and Hymenogastraceae Vittad. As a result, we propose Romagnesiella gen. nov. to accommodate G. clavus, for which a taxonomic description is given and lectotype and epitype are designated. The genus Crassisporium gen. nov. is proposed to encompass Pachylepyrium funariophilum (of which P. carbonicola is considered a younger taxonomic synonym), P. chilense M.M. Moser, and P. squarrulosum Singer. Crassisporium is distinguished from Romagnesiella by its thick-walled basidiospores and occurrence in burnt habitats. The identities of the morphologically similar Tubaria umbonata S. Lundell, T. embolus (Fr.) Sacc. and T. minima J.E. Lange are also discussed. Key words: Agaricoid clade, carbonicolous fungi, Hymenogastraceae, Pachylepyrium, Strophariaceae, taxonomy, taxon sampling, types Introduction Considerable progress has been made to assess phylogenetic relationships in the Agaricales (Binder, Larsson, Matheny, & Hibbett, 2010; Garnica, Weiss, Walther, & Oberwinkler, 2007; Matheny, et al., 2006; Moncalvo et al., 2002), the largest order of mushroom-forming fungi with some 13 500 described species (Kirk, Cannon, Minter, & Stalpers, 2008). However, continued assessment of evolutionary relationships within the order is necessary. For instance, taxa from the tropics and southern hemisphere are in need of better integration into more inclusive molecular systematic treatments (Matheny et al., 2009, Rees, Midgley, Marchant, Perkins, & Orlovich, 2013), and some species are known only from type collections, of insufficient age for adequate gene *Correspondence to: P. Brandon Matheny. Email: pmatheny@ utk.edu ISSN 1477-2000 print / 1478-0933 online Ó The Trustees of the Natural History Museum, London 2014. All Rights Reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2014.967823 sampling, missing or unavailable (Ammirati, Parker, & Matheny, 2007; Baroni & Matheny, 2011). The genus Galerina Earle (Agaricales), typified by G. vittiformis (Fr.) Singer, traditionally encompasses saprotrophic dark-spored agarics often with small and slender fruit bodies with a bell-shaped pileus (mycenoid or collybioid in habit), straight pileal margin, attached lamellae, presence of veil, and an ochre to rusty brown spore deposit. Spores of Galerina are typically yellow to dark tawny in KOH (potassium hydroxide), amygdaliform to elliptic, often verruculose or rugulose, and lack a welldefined germ pore. The spores of many species of Galerina are also characterized by a smooth region above the apiculus on the adaxial side of the spore (this is known as a plage) (Bon, 1992; Gulden, 2012; Watling & Gregory, 1993). The first (and only) detailed phylogenetic assessment of Galerina strongly suggests the genus is Downloaded by [University of Tennessee, Knoxville] at 13:56 31 October 2014 2 P. Brandon Matheny et al. Fig. 1 2. Fruit bodies of Galerina clavus in situ (PAM06090110). Photo by P.-A. Moreau. Scale bar D 10 mm. (Fig. 2) Fruit bodies of Pachylepyrium carbonicola in situ (PBM2293, WTU). Scale bar D 10 mm. Photo by P.B. Matheny. polyphyletic (Gulden, Stensrud, Shalchian-Tabrizi, & Kauserud, 2005). Galerina clavus Romagn. (Fig. 1) is a small inconspicuous species published in 1944 by Romagnesi (1942) from Europe that displays a combination of anomalous characters for the genus: namely, its naucorioid habit (small size, pileus with a decurved margin), smooth spores without a plage, and absence of a veil. The combination of these traits cast doubts on an alliance with Galerina (de Haan & Walleyn, 2009; Moreau, 2009). Smith & Singer (1964) treated G. clavus in their world monograph of Galerina but placed it, together with the South American species G. fuegiana Singer, in an isolated section Pseudotubaria A.H. Sm. & Singer. This classification has been used by Bon (1992), Horak (2005), Moser (1978, 1983) and Singer (1986). Molecular systematic studies of Galerina and other dark-spored agarics (Aime, Vilgalys, & Miller, 2005; Garnica, Weiss, Walther, & Oberwinkler, 2007; Gulden, Stensrud, Shalchian-Tabrizi, & Kauserud, 2005; Matheny et al., 2006, 2007a; Moncalvo et al., 2002; Petersen, Knudsen, & Seberg, 2010; Walther, Garnica, & Weiß 2005) have not included G. clavus, and thus its systematic position remains ambiguous. Based on preliminary phylogenetic analysis of nuclear ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequences, samples of G. clavus clustered together with sequences of the North American species Pachylepyrium carbonicola (A.H. Sm.) Singer (Fig. 2). The genus Pachylepyrium Singer (Agaricales, Strophariaceae; type: P. fulvidula (Singer) Singer), however, contains seven accepted species that differ from G. clavus by their thick-walled spores typically with a germ pore and presence of a veil. Furthermore, most species are carbonicolous (Claridge, Trappe, & Hansen, 2009; McMullan-Fisher et al., 2011), fruiting among burnt debris or on burnt ground in co-occurrence with bryophytes (viz. Funaria Hedwig) or on wood (lignicolous) (Moser, 2000; Singer, 1986). Thus, a substantial taxonomic emendation would be required to place G. clavus within Pachylepyrium. To confirm phylogenetic and taxonomic relationships to other species of Pachylepyrium (viz. the type species of the genus, P. fulvidula), we produced molecular data from four of seven type collections of species accepted in this genus. We also studied a fifth type collection morphologically and several collections of European naucorioid fungi showing similar characters to G. clavus, including Tubaria umbonata S. Lundell, T. minima J.E. Lange and T. embolus (Fr.) Sacc. Collections of Pachylepyrium are not common (Moser, 2000), probably owing to their specific habitat (mostly burnt areas), which is in decline in regions of Europe (Veerkamp 1998). While dense taxon sampling from broad geographic areas is a laudable goal, our focus is to produce a contemporary taxonomic revision based on available type materials. To accomplish this and a more thorough systematic comparison with G. clavus, we carried out a multi-gene phylogenetic analysis with an emphasis on the Agaricoid clade (Matheny et al., 2006) to investigate the relationship of G. clavus to Pachylepyrium. Materials and methods Morphological analysis Collections of fruit bodies were studied from the personal herbarium of M. Contu and material preserved at IB, K, LIP, MICH, MPU, PC and TENN. Herbarium designations follow Thiers (continuously updated). Colour designations in the format ‘(5E7)’ refer to plate, column and row of Kornerup & Wanscher (1967). Microscopic observations were made in 5% KOH, Melzer’s reagent and water mounts. Spores were measured on a Moticam 1000 video camera connected to a Nachet Andromede 0181 compound microscope or on a Nikon Eclipse 80i using NIS Elements (D) imaging software. First and ninth deciles (D1, 9) and average values (italicized and in bold) are presented according to Fannechere (2005, 2009). Two new genera of dark-spored Agaricales Downloaded by [University of Tennessee, Knoxville] at 13:56 31 October 2014 Type collections examined for molecular and taxonomic analyses To evaluate the relationship between Galerina clavus and Pachylepyrium, we performed molecular and/or morphological annotations of five Pachylepyrium species, including type collections and the type species of the genus (P. fulvidula). The type of G. clavus is missing. Pachylepyrium types studied by us include: P. carbonicola AHS44640 (holotype of Kuehneromyces carbonicola A.H. Sm., MICH); P. funariophilum IB 1949/0008 (holotype of Pholiotina funariophila M.M. Moser); P. nubicola Singer K (M 181790) (holotype); P. fulvidula T1495 (isotype of Phaeomarasmius fulvidulus, MICH); and P. chilense M.M. Moser M3269 (paratype, MICH) (see also Appendix 1, online supplemental material, which is available from the article’s Taylor & Francis Online page at http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/14772000.2014.967823). We obtained a loan of part of the holotype (IB) of P. chilense, but the material was inadequate for destructive sampling. Material of representative G. clavus sequenced included PAM06090110 (LIP) and Contu 15122007 (pers. herb.). To assess the taxonomic relationship of G. clavus to Tubaria umbonata and T. embolus, we examined the isotype of T. umbonata (ex Fungi exsiccati Suecici 2041 (PC)) and accessions labelled as ‘Galerina embolus’ (Fr.) P.D. Orton (Bon 741120, Bon 70624) at LIP. Other taxa selected for phylogenetic analyses are listed in Appendix 1 (see supplemental material online). DNA extraction, PCR and Sanger sequencing Procedures for DNA extraction, PCR and Sanger sequencing follow those outlined in Matheny et al. (2007b); Matheny, Austin, Birkebak, & Wolfenbarger (2010) except where mentioned below. For collections older than 30 years, we used an E.Z.N.A. High Performance (HP) Fungal DNA kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, Georgia, USA). We sampled the ITS region, including the 5.8S gene, using primers ITS1F and ITS4 (Gardes & Bruns 1993; White, Bruns, Lee, & Taylor, 1990); the 50 end of the nuclear 25S large subunit ribosomal RNA gene region (nLSU) using primers LR0R and LR7 or LR5 (Vilgalys & Hester, 1990); almost the entire nuclear 18S small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (nSSU) between primers PNS1 and NS8 (O’Donnell, Cigelnik, & Benny, 1998; White, Bruns, Lee, & Taylor, 1990); and the most variable region of rpb2 between conserved domains 6 and 7 using primers b6F and b7.1R (Matheny, 2005). All new sequences have been deposited in GenBank (shown in bold in Appendix 1, see supplemental material online). DNA alignments and phylogenetic analyses We manually aligned 151 of our 153 new nLSU, nSSU, 5.8S and rpb2 sequences from 42 taxa, including type collections of Pachylepyrium funariophilum and P. fulvidula (type species of Pachylepyrium) with alignments 3 produced by Matheny et al. (2006) in MacClade 4.08 (Maddison & Maddison, 2005). We were only able to obtain ITS sequences from type collections of Pachylepyrium nubicola and Pachylepyrium carbonicola; thus, these were not added to our alignment due to insufficient variation across the 5.8S locus. Integration of ITS1 and ITS2 spacer sequences was not possible due to their high substitution rates. However, we did add sequences from two conspecific collections of P. carbonicola determined as such by A.H. Smith (sequences of which did not differ from the holotype). The datasets were pruned to exemplars of the Tricholomatoid clade and all members of the Agaricoid clade following Matheny et al. (2006). To these we added rRNA and/or rpb2 sequences of Leucoagaricus barssii (Zeller) Vellinga (Matheny et al., 2007b) and Pseudoclitocybe cyathiformis (Bull.: Fr.) Singer from Binder, Larsson, Matheny, and Hibbett (2010) and rRNA and/or rpb2 sequences of Squamanita paradoxa (A.H. Sm. & Singer) Bas, Mycocalia denudata (Fr. & Nordholm) J.T. Palmer and Nidula niveotomentosa (Henn.) Lloyd from Matheny & Griffith (2010). LSU and 5.8S sequences (AF261513, EF051055, EF051060) of ‘Pachylepyrium funariophilum’ from Moncalvo et al. (2002) and ‘Tubaria minima’ of Matheny et al. (2007a) were also added. Alignments were concatenated in MacClade in a noninterleaved format with the final supermatrix composed of 170 taxa. Sixty-five taxa (38%) lacked rpb2 sequences, 21 (12%) lacked 5.8S sequences and 27 (16%) lacked SSU sequences. Several studies (Wiens, 2006; Wiens & Moen, 2008; Wiens & Tu, 2012) demonstrate that incorporation of incompletely sampled taxa in supermatrices improves phylogenetic accuracy, if the overall number of characters is sufficiently large, thus supporting a supermatrix approach. The concatenated alignment and tree files have been submitted to TreeBASE (S15353). We converted the concatenated supermatrix from nexus format to a relaxed phylip format in Seaview version 4.2.4 (Gouy, Guindon, & Gascuel, 2010) after inspection for strongly supported conflict (>70%) between rRNA and rpb2 gene trees following Matheny (2005) using Maximum Likelihood (ML) bootstrapping as indicated below. The resulting concatenated rRNA and rpb2 phylip file contained 4508 total sites: 1451 sites from LSU, 1782 sites from SSU, 158 sites from the 5.8S gene and 1117 sites from the rpb2 gene region between conserved domains 5 and 7 after trimming staggered ends. A partition text file was created to model the rRNA gene regions (positions 1 3391) separately from first, second and third codon positions of rpb2 (positions 3392 4508) to allow separate GTRGAMMA models for each partition following model selection in Matheny et al. (2006) and recommendations made in the RAxML user manual (Stamatakis, 2006). Thus, four unique partitions were established with one for the rRNA gene regions and three separate partitions for each rpb2 codon position. Downloaded by [University of Tennessee, Knoxville] at 13:56 31 October 2014 4 P. Brandon Matheny et al. RAxML version 7.2.8 was used to generate 1000 rapid bootstraps and a final ML tree with all free model parameters estimated by the program. The same partitions were invoked using the parallel version of MrBayes 3.1.2 (Altekar, Dwarkadas, Huelsenbeck, & Ronquist, 2004; Ronquist & Huelsenbeck, 2003) for a Bayesian inference of the phylogeny with each partition modelled according to GTRCICG following Matheny et al. (2006). This analysis entailed two independent runs for 50 million generations sampling trees and other parameters every 5000 generations on the Newton High Performance Computing cluster at the University of Tennessee. The average standard deviation of split frequencies was used as a metric to determine an appropriate burn-in. Trees were viewed in FigTree version 1.4.0 (Rambaut, 2009). Pseudoclitocybe cyathiformis was used for rooting purposes based on Binder et al. (2010). ML bootstrap proportions are referred to as MLBP and Bayesian posterior probabilities as BPP. Results Pachylepyrium is polyphyletic 152 ITS, 168 nLSU, 151 sSSU and 105 rpb2 sequences, 153 of which are new, were analysed for this study. The average standard deviation of split frequencies reached less than 0.01 by the 27 795 000th generation in the Bayesian inference analysis of the four-gene region supermatrix. We sampled trees every 5000 steps (producing a total of 10 001 trees for each of the two 50 million generation runs); thus, we conservatively burned the first 6001 trees, including the initial starting tree. Posterior probabilities were calculated from a total sample of 8000 trees (4000 from each run). Comparison of the rRNA-only ML phylogeny with that of the rpb2 ML phylogeny (data not shown) revealed no significantly supported conflicts. The genus Pachylepyrium is polyphyletic (Fig. 3). The type species, P. fulvidula, clusters with strong support (80% MLBP, 0.99 BPP) among a grade of lineages that includes Phaeomarasmius Scherff., Flammulaster Earle and Phaeomyces E. Horak in the Tubariaceae. Pachylepyrium carbonicola and P. funariophilum cluster with strong support with Galerina clavus (90% MLBP, 1.0 BPP) forming a weakly supported sister group to exemplars of the Strophariaceae and Hymenogastraceae. ITS sequences of type collections of Pachylepyrium carbonicola and P. funariophilum differ only at two positions excluding polymorphic sites. A blastn analysis of the ITS sequence of the holotype of Pachylepyrium nubicola strongly suggests this species belongs to the genus Pholiota (96% similar to Ph. terrestris HQ604756, 95% similar to Ph. gummosa JF908581 and 95% similar to numerous other ITS sequences of Pholiota). Two collections (TENN053270, TENN05174) labelled Pachylepyrium funariophilum are incorrectly identified and not identical to each other. TENN053270, from Washington state, likely represents a species of Psilocybe as first suggested by Walther, Garnica, and Weiß (2005), whereas TENN051714, collected in North Carolina, is an unidentified species of Deconica. Morphological examination of both collections affirms these results. The monophyly of the Agaricoid clade of Matheny et al. (2006) is for the first time highly supported (77% MLBP, 1.0 BPP). Monophyly of the Agaricoid clade was recovered with significant BPP in Garnica et al. (2007) and Matheny et al. (2006), but with poor maximum parsimony bootstrap support. The Hydnangiaceae is indicated as the sister group to the rest of the Agaricoid clade but with high BPP only (0.99). A grouping of the Cortinariaceae, Bolbitiaceae, Tubariaceae, Inocybaceae, Crepidotaceae, Strophariaceae, Hymenogastraceae, and Agrocybe erebia receives poor bootstrap support but high BPP (0.99). Taken together, eight of 12 families in the Agaricoid clade (Inocybaceae, Tubariaceae, Bolbitiaceae, Cortinariaceae, Agaricaceae, Psathyrellaceae, Nidulariaceae, Hydnangiaceae) receive strong statistical support in our analyses (MLBP >70% and BPP >0.95). The Hymenogastraceae and Crepidotaceae are supported with only high BPPs (0.99). The Squamanitaceae is recovered as monophyletic, but with poor support. Similar to Matheny et al. (2006) the Hymenogastraceae and Strophariaceae are recovered as sister groups with a high posterior probability. Unlike Matheny et al. (2006) samples of Gymnopilus, which previously were placed in an isolated position with the Agaricoid clade, now cluster with samples of Galerina in the Hymenogastraceae but without strong support. The lineage containing Pachylepyrium funariophilum and P. carbonicola is proposed as a new genus based on molecular, morphological and ecological distinctions between it and the lineage containing Galerina clavus, and due to the placement of the type of Pachylepyrium in the Tubariaceae. A separate genus is proposed to accommodate G. clavus due to differences in morphology and ecology with respect to Pachylepyrium funariophilum and P. carbonicola. All three taxa, however, are united by their basidiospores that darken to various shades of reddish brown in KOH. The spores of Pachylepyrium fulvidula are brownish yellow to yellowish brown in water mounts and darken to brown (not reddish brown) in KOH. Taxonomy Crassisporium Matheny, P.-A. Moreau & Vizzini gen. nov. MYCOBANK No: MB 807853. TYPE SPECIES: Pholiotina funariophila M.M. Moser, 1954. ETYMOLOGY: crassus, Latin, means thick, and sporium, Latin, spore; in reference to the thick-walled basidiospores (gender: neuter). Downloaded by [University of Tennessee, Knoxville] at 13:56 31 October 2014 Two new genera of dark-spored Agaricales Agaricoid clade Galerina sp. PR6575 Galerina marginata Galerina semilanceata Galerina atkinsoniana Gymnopilus spectabilis Gymnopilus sapineus Galerina sp. NLB293 Psilocybe cyanescens 77 Psilocybe subaeruginosa Psilocybe cubensis Psilocybe stuntzii Psilocybe s ocybe y caerulipes ca ae u p pes ‘Pa achylepy pyyrium funariophilum’ fun nariophil p lum’ TENN TENN053270 N053270 ‘Pachylepyrium ll t Anamika angustilamellata Hebeloma affine Hebeloma velutipes Hebeloma olympianum Undet Hymenogastraceae sp. PBM3420 Undet Hymenogastraceae sp. PBM3116 Alnicola escharioides Flammula alnicola Hymenogastraceae Phaeocollybia festiva Hypholoma fasciculare Hypholoma subviride Strophariaceae Hypholoma australe Hypholoma sublateritium “Naematoloma” longisporum Stropharia ambigua Stropharia rugosoannulata Pholiota aff. astragalina Nivatogastrium nubigenum Pholiota multicingulata Pholiota squarrosa Agrocybe smithii Agrocybe praecox Agrocybe pediades Agrocybe rivulosa Deconica montana “Pachylepyrium funariophilum” “Pa achylepy y pyyrium fun nariophillum” TENN TENN051714 N051714 “Psilocybe P silvatica” Deconica sp. PBM3781 Kuehneromyces y rostratus Pachylepyrium carbonicola P achylep pyrium ca arbonicola a TENN02878 TENN028785 85 (=type) P achylep h l pyrium i ca arbonicola b i la TENN02878 TENN028784 84 (=type) Pachylepyrium carbonicola Crassisporium P Pachylepyrium achylep hyl pyyrium i fun ffunariophilum nariophilu i philum Moser49 Moser49/08 9/08 (type) gen. nov. Pachylepyrium Pa achylepyr y p pyrium funariophilum funa ariophilum p m Moser49/222 Pachylepyrium carbonicola Pa achylepyrrium carb bonicola PB PBM2293/PBM1411 BM2293/PBM1411 Galerina clavus C15122007 Romagnesiella gen. nov. Galerina clavus PAM06090110 (epitype) Crepidotus variabilis Crepidotus sp. PBM3463 Crepidotus cf. applanatus Simocybe sp. PBM3031 Simocybe serrulata Pleuroflammula praestans Pleuroflammula flammea Crepidotaceae Pleuroflammula tuberculosa Inocybe lilacina Inocybe aff. asterospora Inocybe mutata Inocybe rimosoides Inocybe unicolor Inocybaceae Inocybe myriadophylla Tubaria serrulata Tubaria confragosa Tubaria vinicolor Tubaria furfuracea Tubaria sp. PBM3355 Tubaria sp. BM378_17 Phaeomyces dubiosus Flammulaster sp. PBM3449 p PBM1871 Flammulaster sp. Pachylepyrium fulvidula P achyle epyrium m fulvidu ula Okada Okada170163 a170163 Pachyle h lepyrium i m fulvidula fulvidu f l idulla T14955 ((type) Pachylepyrium Tubariaceae i Phaeomarasmius proximans Agrocybe erebia Conocybe apala Conocybe smithii Bolbitius vitellinus undet Bolbitiaceae Pholiotina filaris sp. PBM3032 Descolea maculata Descolea recedens Descolea phlebophora Descolea tenuipes Panaeolus papilionaceus Panaeolus sphinctrinus Bolbitiaceae Panaeolina foenisecii Cortinarius aurilicis Cortinarius sodagnitus Cortinarius iodes Cortinarius bolaris Cortinariaceae Cortinarius violaceus Agaricus bisporus Agaricus campestris Agaricus sylvaticus Hymenagaricus taiwanensis Chlorophyllum agaricoides Undet. Agaricaceae sp. RC_Mart06_016 Leucoagaricus barssii Lycoperdon pyriforme Langermannia gigantea Macrolepiota procera Macrolepiota dolichaula Lepiota cristata Verrucospora flavofusca Coprinus comatus Agaricaceae Lepiota maculans Tulostoma macrocephala Psathyrella spadicea Psathyrella rhodospora Lacrymaria velutina Psathyrella candolleana Psathyrella gracilis Coprinopsis atramentaria Coprinopsis cinerea Coprinellus disseminatus Psathyrellaceae Mythicomyces corneipes Cyathus striatus Nidulariaceae Crucibulum laeve Nidula niveotomentosa Mycocalia denudata Squamanita paradoxa Squamanitaceae Cystoderma amianthinum Laccaria bicolor Laccaria pumila Laccaria ochropurpurea Laccaria amethystina Hydnangiaceae Hydnangium carneum 5 0.07 expected substitutions per site Fig. 3. Phylogeny of the Agaricoid clade based on a Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference analysis of a supermatrix of four nuclear gene regions (5.8S rRNA, LSU-rRNA, SSU-rRNA and rpb2 conserved domains 5 7). Thickened branches indicate ML bootstrap support >70% and Bayesian posterior probability >0.95. Nodes that receive Bayesian posterior probabilities >0.95 but with <70% ML bootstrap are indicated by small black-filled circles. Clade nomenclature follows Matheny et al. (2006). Grey shaded taxon labels indicate placement of species of Pachylepyrium or collections mislabelled Pachylepyrium. 6 P. Brandon Matheny et al. Downloaded by [University of Tennessee, Knoxville] at 13:56 31 October 2014 0.07 expected substitutions per site Clitocybe aff. fellea PBM3028 Callistosporium graminicolor Catathelasma ventricosum Cleistocybe carneogrisea Catathelasma clade Cleistocybe vernalis Entoloma canescens Inocephalus sp. GD_b Entoloma strictius Entoloma sericeum Entoloma sinuatum Entoloma “prunuloides” Clitopilus prunulus Entolomataceae Rhodocybe mundula “Leucopaxillus albissimus” Tricholoma inamoenum Tricholoma myomyces Tricholoma palustre Tricholoma matsutake Tricholoma saponaceum Tricholomataceae Porpoloma sp. PR3995 Termitomyces microcarpus Termitomyces sp. ZA164 Tephrocybe boudieri Calocybe carnea Calocybe gangraenosa Ossicaulis lignatilis Tricholomella constricta Asterophora lycoperdoides Lyophyllum aff. decaste Lyophyllum decastes Lyophyllaceae Lyophyllum sp. PBM2688 Clitocybe candicans Clitocybe p.p. Clitocybe subditopoda Lepista personata Lepista sordida Clitocybe dealbata Clitocybe nebularis Lepista irina Clitocybeae Clitocybe adirondackensis Pseudoclitocybe cyathiformis Outgroups Infundibulicybe gibba Fig. 3. (Continued) DIAGNOSIS: Basidiomata naucorioid, pileus hygrophanous, veil present. Lamellae attached (adnate). Basidiospores smooth, ovate or subangular, wider in face view than in profile, thick-walled (>0.5 mm thick) and with a broad or conspicuous germ pore (often >0.5 mm wide), brownish yellow to golden yellow in water mounts, becoming rusty brown to reddish brown or rich reddish cinnamon in KOH. Pleurocystidia and chrysocystidia absent, cheilocystidia present. Pileipellis a cutis, not gelatinized. Hymenophoral trama regular to subregular, subhymenium not gelatinized. Clamp connections present. Carbonicolous. Typus: Pholiotina funariophila M.M. uhner & Romagnesi, Bull. Soc. nat. Oyonnax Moser, in K€ 8: 43, 1954. Crassisporium chilense (M.M. Moser) Matheny, P.-A. Moreau & Vizzini, comb. nov. MYCOBANK no: MB 807854. BASIONYM: Pachylepyrium chilense M.M. Moser, Hoppea 61: 268, 2000, holotype seen. Chile. Remarks The carbonicolous habit and the smooth thick-walled basidiospores (c. 1.0 mm thick) with a distinct broad germ pore and rust brown colouration in KOH support transfer to Crassisporium. The species has been recorded from highelevation (550 m) Nothofagus forests in Chile and differs from P. funariophilum by the somewhat smaller spores (7.0 8.5 £ 4.5 6.0 mm versus 7.5 10.0 £ 5.5 7.0 mm) and a more weakly developed and ochraceous veil, which is more strongly developed and white in P. funariophilum (Moser, 2000). Unfortunately, material sent to us from the holotype collection was not sufficient for examination and DNA extraction. However, upon examination of materials labelled Pachylepyrium funariophilum located at MICH, we found the spores of one collection (M3269, Validivia, Chile, including one small fruit body) to measure 7.0 8.5 £ 4.5 6.0 mm. Based on the taxonomic key below, this material keys out to Crassisporium chilense due to the smaller spores and occurrence in Chile. Moser (2000) mistakenly cites two different collections (M3208 in the Latin diagnosis and M3269 in the German description) as the isotype of Pachylepyrium chilense. We suspect the designation of M3269 as isotype is an error as the referenced collection date (3 Mar. 1963) in Moser’s publication does not match that for M3269 (31 Mar. 1963). Under this scenario M3269 is the paratype. Unfortunately, the collection date on the holotype packet (IB 1963/0210) is 30 Mar. 1963 (unlike the protologue), but the locality is exactly that of M3269. Permission to extract DNA from the one small fruit body of M3269 (paratype) was not granted owing to the inadequate condition of this material. Crassisporium funariophilum (M.M. Moser) Matheny, P.-A. Moreau & Vizzini, comb. nov. (Fig. 2, as Pachylepyrium carbonicola). MYCOBANK No: MB 807855. Two new genera of dark-spored Agaricales Downloaded by [University of Tennessee, Knoxville] at 13:56 31 October 2014 BASIONYM: Pholiotina funariophila M.M. Moser, in K€ uhner & Romagnesi, Bull. Soc. nat. Oyonnax 8: 43, 1954, holotype seen. Austria.  Pachylepyrium funariophilum (M.M. Moser) Singer, in Singer & Moser, Mycopath. Mycol. Appl. 26(2-3): 171, 1965. D Kuehneromyces carbonicola A.H. Sm., Beihefte zur Sydowia 1: 53, 1957. Holotype seen. Idaho.  Pachylepyrium carbonicola (A.H. Sm.) Singer, Sydowia 11: 321, 1958 [1957].  Pholiota subangularis A.H. Sm. & Hesler, The North American Species of Pholiota: 44, 1968. Remarks Crassisporium funariophilum is geographically widespread occurring in Europe, northern Africa and western North America (where it has been referred to as Pachylepyrium carbonicola and Pholiota subangularis) and may be expected elsewhere. Singer & Moser (1965) and Singer (1969) also report it from Argentina, but this material has not been revised in light of description of P. chilense (see above). Moser (2000) describes collections of P. carbonicola with a white fugacious veil and similar ecology to P. funariophilum, but with somewhat larger spores (8.2 12.1 £ 6.5 8.3 mm) than for P. funariophilum (7.6 10.0 £ 5.3 7.1 mm). However, pairwise comparison of ITS sequences from the type collections of C. funariophilum and P. carbonicola differ at only two nucleotide positions (excluding three polymorphic sites among the five sequences considered) strongly suggesting the two species are conspecific. As such, P. funariophilum has nomenclatural priority. Crassisporium squarrulosum (Singer) Matheny, P.-A. Moreau & Vizzini, comb. nov. MYCOBANK no: MB 807856. BASIONYM: Pachylepyrium squarrulosum Singer, Beih. Nova Hedwigia 29: 281, 1969, holotype not seen. Chile. Remarks We have not studied material of C. sqarrulosum, but the thick spore wall with a truncate germ pore and intense ‘ferruginous’ colouration in KOH described by Singer (1969) are consistent with placement in Crassisporium rather than with the type of Pachylepyrium in the Tubariaceae or with Romagnesiella. The species is associated with burnt debris and occurs at high elevations (1000 m) in Chile. The type (M 6550) is reportedly at SGO. The species differs most readily from C. chilense by the 7 flocculose-squarrose pileus surface and longer spores (12.0 14.0 £ 6.5 8.0 mm). Pholiota nubicola (Singer) Matheny & P.-A. Moreau, comb. nov. MYCOBANK No: MB 807857. BASIONYM: Pachylepyrium nubicola Singer in Dennis, Kew Bull. 15(1): 139, 1961, holotype seen. Venezuela. Remarks The ITS sequence produced from the holotype strongly suggests that Pachylepyrium nubicola is a species of Pholiota. Consistent with this placement are the caespitose and lignicolous habit, paler (yellowish) pigmented basidiospores with a thinner wall than in Crassisporium, strongly gelatinized pileipellis composed of coarsely incrusted yellowish hyphae, and gelatinized subhymenial trama. Add to this the slightly phaseoliform spores with a distinct germ pore (0.8 1.0 mm wide) and the squamulose stipe covering, it is not surprising P. nubicola would be closely related to Ph. gummosa (Lasch: Fr.) Singer as described by Holec (2001). In contrast to the protologue, our examination of the type revealed a gelatinized pileipellis and cylindric to subphaseoliform non-dextrinoid basidiospores, these with a distinct germ pore. The spores measure 7.5 8.8 £ 4.5 4.8 mm, which is consistent with the protologue. The basidia measure 17 28 £ 7 8 mm with yellowish contents when mature. The lamellar edge was observed to be sterile and yellow but without reviving elements. The presence or absence of chrysocystidia could not be confirmed, but given the high sequence similarity to ITS sequences labelled Ph. gummosa and Ph. terrestris, we predict chrysocystidia will be found in this species. A taxonomic key to species of Crassisporium 1(a) Pileus surface flocculose-squarrose, spores 12 14 £ 6.5 8 mm. . . .................................C. squarrulosum Singer 1(b) Pileus surface glabrous or with marginal fibrils, spores 7 11.5 £ 5.5 7 mm. . .. . .. . .. . .. . . ..................... .2 2(a) Spores mostly 8 11.5 £ 5.5 7 mm, in north temperate forests of Europe, North Africa and western North America (also reported from southern South America, but this is likely C. chilense); veil well developed, white. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . . .. C. funariophilum (M.M. Moser) Singer 2(b) Spores mostly 7 9 £ 4.5 6 mm, in Nothofagus forests in southern South America; veil weakly developed, ochraceous. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . . ... C. chilense M.M. Moser 8 P. Brandon Matheny et al. Downloaded by [University of Tennessee, Knoxville] at 13:56 31 October 2014 Romagnesiella Contu, P.-A. Moreau, Vizzini & A. de Haan, gen. nov. MYCOBANK No.: MB 519559. TYPE SPECIES: Galerina clavus Romagn., 1944 [1942]. ETYMOLOGY: named in honour of Henri Romagnesi, French mycologist (1912 1997) (gender: feminine). DIAGNOSIS: Basidiomata naucorioid, lamellae distant, adnate to subdecurrent; pileus dry, not hygrophanus; stipe smooth, without a partial veil. Basidiospores smooth, more or less ovate, not subangular, yellow in water mounts, reddish ochre in KOH, not dextrinoid, germ pore absent; necrobasidia numerous; cheilocystidia present, edges of lamellae smooth and (sub)sterile, pleurocystidia present but dispersed and infrequent, pileipellis filamentous, hymenophoral trama regular, clamp connections frequent. On unburnt soil or sand among mosses and grasses. Typus: Galerina clavus Romagn., Bull. Trimest. Soc. Mycol. France 58(4): 149 (1944 [1942]). Romagnesiella clavus (Romagn.) Contu, P.-A. Moreau, Vizzini & A. de Haan, comb. nov. (Figs 1, 4 8). MYCOBANK No.: MB 519560. BASIONYM: Galerina clavus Romagn., Bull. Trimest. Soc. Mycol. France 58(4): 149, 1944 [1942], lectotype designated here (Fig. 14, p. 145, Romagnesi (1944) [1942], MBT177567); epitype designated here (P.-A. Moreau 06090110, LIP, MBT177568). Switzerland.  Naucoria clavus (Romagn.) K€uhner & Romagn., Fl. Anal. Champ. Sup.: 239 (1953, comb. inval., Art. 33.4). MISAPPLICATIONS: Tubaria minima J.E. Lange sensu Moreau in Matheny et al. (2007a: 571); Galerina embolus Figs. 4 8. Anatomical features of Romagnesiella clavus (PAM06090110, epitype). (Fig. 4) Spores. (Fig. 5) Basidia and subhymenium. (Fig. 6) Cheilocystidia. (Fig. 7) Pleurocystidium. (Fig. 8) Pileipellis. Scale bars D 10 mm. Two new genera of dark-spored Agaricales (Fr.) Sacc. sensu Orton (1960: 239), sensu de Haan & Walleyn (2009: 64). BIBLIOGRAPHY: Romagnesi (1942: 144, protologue); K€ uhner & Romagnesi (1953: 239; description); Smith & Singer (1964: 336); de Haan & Walleyn (2009: 64, 66: description, picture); North African collections: Hausknecht & Zuccherelli (1993: 47), Moreau (2009: 199). Downloaded by [University of Tennessee, Knoxville] at 13:56 31 October 2014 Description Pileus 5 9 (12) mm diam, hemispheric-umbonate then § depressed around umbo, margin early inrolled becoming shortly crenulate when old, even, not striate, densely furfuraceous-micaceous, grey-brown with somewhat purplish tones when fresh, paler at margin, quickly fading from margin to uniformly fleshy-ochre, without any trace of veil. Lamellae adnexed-ventricose at first, becoming shortly uncinate in age, distant with 14 16 L reaching stipe, interspersed by 1 2 series of lamellulae, dull rusty ochre even when young; edges smooth but (sub)sterile, pale yellow. Stipe 15 25 £ 1 mm, flexuose, slightly attenuate at base and inflated at apex, pruinose-floccose just below lamellae, fibrillose below then glabrous against a uniform dirty brown ground colour, slightly purplish when young; no perceptible trace of veil (primordia not observed). Context dark brown when fresh, pale ochre when dry. Odour and taste fungoid, not remarkable. Basidiospores (5.6) 6.2 6.7 7.3 (8.5) £ (3.6) 3.9 4.2 4.4 (5.0) mm, Q D 1.51 1.62 1.73 (n D 48), ovate to obovate but longer spores more fusiform, smooth, germ pore absent; bright yellow in water, amber yellow in Melzer’s, warm reddish ochre in KOH, wall thickened up to 0.3 (0.5) mm; content with a large central droplet, often elongate. Basidia four-spored, 28 36 £ 7 9 mm, broadly clavate, with long sterigmata, content often microguttulate; necrobasidia abundant, with reddish-brown content. Cheilocystidia 22 45 £ 5.5 7 mm, cylindrical-flexuose with slightly thickened yellowish wall, mixed with fascicles of terminal hyphae issued from trama with pear-shaped to subglobose terminal cells, 9 14 mm wide, lamella edge fertile to locally substerile. Pleurocystidia 38 42 £ 7.5 13 mm, cylindrical to subutriform, not very distinct but not rare. Hymenophoral trama regular, with strongly encrusted hyphae, 3 5 mm wide. Pileipellis a superficial layer of short cells, these lobate, digitate, puzzle-like, fusiform or pyriform, 12 16 mm wide, more or less erected to nearly hymeniform towards margin, pale in KOH, smooth, issued from hyphae of subpellis; subpellis filamentous, coarsely encrusted, thick-walled, deep yellow to reddish brown in KOH, continuous with pileus context. Stipitipellis a cutis with sparse to fasciculate (at apex) caulocystidia measuring 16 25 £ 5 12 mm, cylindrical to clavate-pyriform, very rare below apex; superficial hyphae slender, 2 3.5 mm wide. Clamp connections frequent. 9 Habitat and distribution: Often on calcareous, mineral-rich, sandy or alluvial substrates in pioneer or disturbed habitats including fixed coastal dunes and banks of trails or paths among mosses and grasses. Less frequent in secondarized dunes, scattered and never abundant. Europe (Belgium, France, Switzerland) and reported from Italy, the Netherlands, and North Africa. Fruiting Sept. Nov. Material studied: BELGIUM. Antwerpen: AntwerpenLinkeroever, Het Rot, 4 Sep 2004; 10 specimens, among grass and mosses (Tortula ruralis and Ceratodon purpureus) on sandy, calcareous soil, herb. A. de Haan n 04101; Antwerpen-Linkeroever, Blokkersdijk, 9 Sep 2004, 2 specimens, among mosses on sandy, calcareous soil, herb. A. de Haan n 04113. Namur: Oignies-en-Thierache, l’Estache, 23 Sep 1999, 1 specimen on wet calcareous soil, herb. A. de Haan n 99100. Oost-Vlaanderen: Zwijnaarde, Rijvisschepark, 15 Oct 1989, about ten carpophores, in bare spot in mossy lawn, on sandy slightly loamy soil, leg. P. Van der Veken, herb. A. de Haan n 89017; same location, leg. P. Van der Veken, 4 specimens, 29 Oct 2003, herb. A. de Haan n 03088. WestVlaanderen: De Panne, Calmeijnbos, 3 Nov 1997, 4 specimens, on humus-rich, calcareous soil, herb. A. de Haan n 97088; Oostduinkerke, Doornpanne, 1 Nov 2001, 2 specimens, among moss and lichens, on calcareous dune sand, herb. A. de Haan n 01080 (as ‘Galerina embolus’). FRANCE. Pas-De-Calais: Equihen-Plage, dunes d’Ecault, 7 November 2004, five specimens in Phleo-Tortuletum with Calamagrostis epigeos, calcareous fixed dune, leg. A. Brabant & P.-A. Moreau, 7 Nov 2004, herb. P.-A. Moreau n 04110710 (LIP); same location, along a sandy path amongst Calamagrostis epigeos, fixed calcareous dunes with Hippophae rhamnoides, leg. C. Hannoire & P.-A. Moreau, 31 Oct 2008, herb. P.-A. Moreau n 08103102 (LIP). Seine: Paris, bois de Vincennes, 1 Oct 1932, herb. R. K€uhner (G, as ‘Tubaria oligophylla’, ined.). ITALY: Sardinia, prov. Olbia, Golfo Aranci, Golfo di Marinella, in troops on sandy soil in a coastal grassland, leg. M. Contu, 15 Dec 2007, herb. M. Contu (C15122007, TENN 063957). SWITZERLAND. Gr€aubunden: Rothenbrunnen, edge of path, riparian Alnus incana forest, on black alluvial humus, 1 Sep 2006, leg. B. Senn-Irlet & P.-A. Moreau, herb. P.-A. Moreau n 06090110 (epitype LIP), TENN 063587, TENN 063976. Remarks Our interpretation of Galerina clavus is based on the detailed protologue of Romagnesi (1944 [1942]), which matches collections from Belgium and Switzerland. Unfortunately, no original material of Galerina clavus exists. The herbarium packet corresponding to one of the two collections cited by Romagnesi (1942: 145) Yerres, bois de Cerçay, 18 Jun 1942, kept in herb. H. Romagnesi Downloaded by [University of Tennessee, Knoxville] at 13:56 31 October 2014 10 P. Brandon Matheny et al. (PC) was empty. The other cannot be located. Because a figure that depicts G. clavus exists in the protologue, this must serve as the lectotype. Original drawings of G. clavus made by Romagnesi also exist at PC. Thus, we designate PAM06090110 (LIP) as an epitype. The species features some morphological and microscopic variation. The epitype (sequenced here), showed purplish-grey tones on the stipe as well as the pileus, but the protologue only mentions this colour on the stipe. Belgian collections described by de Haan & Walleyn (2009) describe a more convex pileus, broadly adnate instead of subdecurrent lamellae, a ‘weakly farinaceous’ taste, and habitat in dry mineral spots in urban grasslands. However, all collections show gradual variation in the pileus shape, colour and lamellae attachment. Coastal collections are probably better considered as variants of R. clavus. Despite some variation in spore dimensions we could not find any support for specific or infraspecific distinctions. Detailed spore measurements illustrate continuity in these variation patterns but apparent differences (Appendix 2, see supplemental material online). North African and Sardinian collections of Galerina clavus, as described by Hausknecht & Zuccherelli (1993) and Malençon (Moreau, 2009), differ from continental collections by somewhat larger basidiospores [(7.0) 7.6 8.2 9.0 (10) £ (4.0) 4.9 5.2 5.5 (5.7) mm, Q D 1.48 1.59 1.70], slightly larger cystidia, and a filamentous pileipellis with a more or less continuous suprapellis of slender cylindrical hyphae with sparse slightly upraised terminal elements. It is possible that Mediterranean collections may represent distinct populations. One collection from Sardinia was sequenced (C15122007, leg. M. Contu), in which the ITS1 region reveals nine site differences with R. clavus PAM6090110, four of which, however, are polymorphic in C15122007. Galerina clavus has also been reported from the Netherlands (www. verspreidingsatlas.nl/046620). Romagnesiella clavus is probably often confused with other naucorioid species frequent in the same environment, uhner, Psilocybe such as Galerina graminea (Velen.) K€ pratensis P.D. Orton, or Tubaria spp. The distant lamellae and absence of a veil on the stipe are good distinctive field characters. However, we discuss below three additional species with which R. clavus could be confused. Tubaria umbonata S. Lundell in Lundell & Nannfeldt (1953: 23). (Figs 9 13). MYCOBANK No. 307168. ISOTYPE: SWEDEN. Upland: Uppsala, Slottsbaken, NW part below Gunillaklaken, 50 m from Stockholmsv€agen, 6 August 1944, leg. S. Lundell, ex Fungi exsiccati Suecici 2041 (PC, about 20 well-preserved specimens). Description Exsiccata small to minute (2 6 mm), very slender, entirely dark brown, without visible veil, with arcuate and distant lamellae. Basidiospores (6.2) 6.5 7.2 8.0 (9.0) £ (3.0) 3.2 3.7 4.2 mm, Q D 1.70 1.96 2.24 (n D 23; see also Appendix 2, see supplemental material online), pale yellow, slightly thick-walled (<0.5 mm thick), ochraceous yellow in KOH, not collapsing, narrowly ovo-ellipsoidal to ellipsoidal, with slightly guttulate content, not dextrinoid. Basidia 22 34 £ 6.5 7.5 mm, 4-spored (occasionally 2-spored), clavate more or less capitate, often strangulate under apex before maturity, hyaline; subhymenium 12 15 mm thick, filamentous-ramose, with hyphae 2 2.5 mm wide. Cheilocytidia 16 30 £ 6 11.5 mm, often clustered ampullaceous, clavate, ellipsoidal, utriform, cylindrical, with a thin and smooth wall, intermixed with some fertile basidia; lamella edge almost sterile. Pleurocystidia if present, not studied. Hymenophoral trama regular, yellowish, made of slender hyphae 2 6 mm wide with thick encrusted wall. Pileipellis with a discontinuous suprapellis made of C/¡ erected wide ellipsoidal to cylindrical catenulate elements, 18 30 £ 6 13 mm, pale, slightly thick-walled, not or only locally encrusted; subpellis made of slender hyphae 3.5 8 mm wide, distinctly encrusted by granular pigment remaining yellow in KOH. Stipitipellis with sparse traces of filamentous veil towards apex, composed of slender hyphae 3 5 mm wide; wall yellowish, up to 2 mm thick and encrusted, terminal cells cylindrical with some vesicular cells up to 20 mm wide; superficial hyphae slender, these 3 5 mm wide, with yellow walls up to 0.5 mm thick, intermixed with large cylindrical hyphae 9 16 mm wide, locally encrusted by gold-yellow pigment (KOH), especially at septa, and some sparse pale gleoplerous hyphae. Clamp connections present at septa. Remarks Tubaria umbonata has not been revised nor documented since its publication in Fungi Exsiccati Suecici (Lundell & Nannfeldt 1953). We studied the isotype at PC (Fungi Exsiccati Suecici fasc. 41 42). Based on our morphological analysis, we conclude that T. umbonata represents a genuine species of Tubaria (W.G. Sm.) Gillet, but with rather narrow spores. DNA extraction of the PC material of T. umbonata yielded no PCR amplicons. Illustrations of anatomical features (Fig. 5) and their description (above) from the isotype are presented. Two additional species could be confused with R. clavus. The name Tubaria minima J.E. Lange (Lange, 1940) was misapplied by Moreau (in Matheny et al., 2007a) to collections of R. clavus. Although Bon (1992) maintains T. minima as an autonomous species, Romagnesi (1942) considers it to be a synonym of T. minutalis Downloaded by [University of Tennessee, Knoxville] at 13:56 31 October 2014 Two new genera of dark-spored Agaricales 11 Figs. 9 13. Anatomical features of Tubaria umbonata (Fungi Exsicatti Suecici fasc. 41 42, isotype). (Fig. 9) Spores. (Fig. 10) Basidia and subhymenium. (Fig. 11) Cheilocystidia. (Fig. 12) pileipellis. (Fig. 13) Stipitipellis. Scale bars D 10 mm. Romagn. (Romagnesi, 1937), a position followed by modern authors. This species (sensu Lange (1940), non Moreau) differs from G. clavus by its hygrophanous piles and smaller spores (5.2 6.0 £ 3.2 3.8 mm), features that reinforce its conspecificity with T. minutalis. Tubaria embolus (Fr.) Sacc. is rather frequently cited in the literature but has been interpreted several different ways. Lange (1938: 655, pl. 127B) illustrates as ‘Tubaria embola’ a species with broadly adnexed lamellae and yellow tones especially in the context (conforming to Fries’ protologue, 1836 1838: 206), which seems to represent Agrocybe pusiola (Fr.) R. Heim. Bon (1992) cites the species in the genus Galerina, but examination of his materials (LIP) showed that his concept was unclear: coll. 741120 is Galerina uncialis (Britzelm.) K€ uhner, and coll. 70624 (as ‘Galerina cf. embolus’) is a species with pleurocystidia close to Galerina vittaeformis (Fr.) K€uhner. Orton (1960: 176) mentions five reports of T. embolus (as ‘Galerina embolus’) from sand dunes, with comparable microscopical characters (but with notably long spores, 9 11 £ 4.5 6 mm, compatible with our coastal collections of R. clavus), but pleurocystidia and necrobasidia are not mentioned. Moreover, yellow tones are described towards the pileus margin when dry, incompatible with any species known to us. In addition de Haan & Walleyn (2009) describe without illustrations a collection of G. embolus (reported here as R. clavus) and also found in fixed dunes in Belgium. Considering the ambiguities of the protologue (Fries, 1836 1838), and the diversity of interpretations proposed by various authors, we reject the name here. Additional morphological and molecular study is required to unravel the taxonomic relationships of these variously interpreted collections to Romagnesiella. 12 P. Brandon Matheny et al. Discussion Downloaded by [University of Tennessee, Knoxville] at 13:56 31 October 2014 Polyphyly of Pachylepyrium and recognition of Crassisporium and Romagnesiella as new genera Our results strongly support the polyphyletic status of Pachylepyrium. The type species of the genus, P. fulvidula, lacks several of the features attributed to the residual species. Originally described in Phaeomarasmius, P. fulvidula fruits on non-burnt woody debris and lacks the broad germ pore observed in other species. Horak (1968) reports seldom seeing any germ pore at all in the type of P. fulvidula. Our examination of the isotype at MICH confirms this observation (a germ pore was not observed). Thus, it is not surprising to see phylogenetic placement of P. fulvidula apart from the residual Pachylepyrium species. Pachylepyrium fulvidula resides in the Tubariaceae (Fig. 3) where it is closely related to other species of Flammulaster, Phaeomyces, Phaeomarasmius and Tubaria (W.G. Sm.) Gillet, all of these also lacking a broad germ pore (Horak, 2005). We place three residual species of Pachylepyrium in the new genus Crassisporium united by a combination of basidiospore features (thick-walled spores with a broad germ pore and rusty to reddish brown colouration in KOH), anatomical features (non-gelatinous cutis, absence of pleurocystidia and chrysocystidia, absence of a gelatinous subhymenial layer) and ecology (carbonicolous habit). However, before our phylogenetic analysis based on molecular data, we did not suspect that Galerina clavus would be related to Crassisporium more so than to any other group of Hymenogastraceae or Strophariaceae. In order to point out differences between typical carbonicolous species with thick-walled pored spores (Crassisporium species) and non-carbonicolous species with thinnerwalled (<0.5 mm) spores such as G. clavus, we have proposed a new genus Romagnesiella to accommodate the latter. No extra-European or North African species are unequivocally attributable to Romagnesiella at present without the addition of detailed morphological and molecular study. Galerina fuegiana Singer from Patagonia (Smith & Singer, 1964) is a possible candidate. The inclusion of sequences of Crassisporium and Romagnesiella in a multigene phylogenetic analysis of the Agaricoid clade shows these two taxa form a well-supported group (Fig. 3) sister to the Strophariaceae s.lat. consortium (Gulden et al., 2005), including the families Hymenogastraceae and Strophariaceae s. str. of Matheny et al. (2006). Inclusion of Crassisporium and Romagnesiella in Strophariaceae s. str. would render the family paraphyletic in this analysis. Consideration of a more broadly conceived Hymenogastraceae, subsuming the Strophariaceae, could be made since the name Hymenogastraceae Vitt. 1831 pre-dates that of the Strophariaceae Singer & A.H. Sm. 1946. However, additional taxon and gene sampling are needed to resolve the relationship between these two families. An alternative scenario to consider is inclusion of the three species of Crassisporium into one genus with R. clavus, thereby describing only a single genus as new. Samples of each group form a clade with strong support, a synapomorphy of which are the basidiospores that deepen various shades of reddish brown in KOH. However, we favour separate genera for the two lineages for several reasons: (1) species of Crassisporium are carbonicolous, whereas those of Romagnesiella are non-carbonicolous; (2) the lamellae are adnate to subdecurrent in Romagnesiella but never subdecurrent in Crassisporium; (3) a veil is absent in Romagnesiella but present in Crassisporium; (4) the basidiospores of Crassisporium feature walls >0.5 mm thick, a wide germ pore typically 1.0 1.5 mm thick, and are subangular in face view. These features may be correlated with the fire ecology in that heat may be required to induce germination (Claridge, Trappe, & Hansen, 2009). Basidiospores of Romagnesiella have thinner walls (<0.5 mm thick), no germ pore and are not subangular; (5) pleurocystidia are present in Romagnesiella but absent in Crassisporium; and (6) the relative branch length differences between the two lineages correspond to branch length differences between other genera of Strophariaceae and Hymenogastraceae. Therefore, we prefer to recognize the two lineages as separate genera. The monophyly of the Agaricoid clade is recovered here for the first time with high bootstrap and significant Bayesian posterior probability. Most species in the Agaricoid clade tend to have pigmented and thick-walled spores, perhaps indicative of adaptations to novel environments (e.g. dung, burnt sites) (Garnica et al., 2007). Many species of the Agaricoid clade also feature multiple nuclei per spore and an open pore type of hilum (Matheny et al., 2006). Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to staff at herbaria G (P. Clerc), IB (R. Kuhner), LIP (R. Courtecuisse and C. Lecuru), MICH (R. Rabeler, P. Rogers), MPU (V. Bourgade, L. Gomel and M.-J. Mauruc), PC (B. Buyck), PERTH (N. Bougher), and the USDA Forest Service, Luqillo, Puerto Rico (D. J. Lodge) for loan of collections. Egon Horak (Innsbruck, Austria) is acknowledged for his study on Sardinian collections sent by M. Contu. Regis Courtecuisse (Lille, France) is also acknowledged for his valuable suggestions and bibliographic expertise. Aaron Wolfenbarger, Emily Giles, Whitaker Hoskins, Sarah Sprague, and Christine Braaten provided laboratory assistance at the University of Tennessee. Three anonymous reviewers and the Associate Editor, Karen Hansen, provided critical feedback that helped improve this paper. Research was conducted at the University of Tennessee, Universite Lille Nord de France, and Universita di Torino. Two new genera of dark-spored Agaricales Funding This work was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Grant DEB-0949517. Supplemental data Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here. Downloaded by [University of Tennessee, Knoxville] at 13:56 31 October 2014 References Aime, M. C., Vilgalys, R. & Miller, O. K. (2005). The Crepidotaceae (Basidiomycota, Agaricales). Phylogeny and taxonomy of the genera and revision of the family based on molecular evidence. American Journal of Botany, 92, 74 82. Altekar, G., Dwarkadas, S., Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. (2004). Parallel Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics, 20, 407 415. Ammirati, J. F., Parker, A. D. & Matheny, P.B. (2007). Cleistocybe, a new genus of Agaricales. Mycoscience, 48, 282 289. Baroni, T. J. & Matheny, P. B. (2011). A re-evaluation of gasteroid and cyphelloid species of Entolomataceae from eastern North America. Harvard Papers in Botany, 16, 293 310. Binder, M., Larsson, K.-H., Matheny, P. B. & Hibbett, D. S. (2010). Amylocorticiales ord. nov. and Jaapiales ord. nov.: early-diverging clades of Agaricomycetidae dominated by corticioid forms. Mycologia, 102, 865 880. Bon, M. (1992). Cle monographique des especes galeronaucorio€ıdes. Documents Mycologiques, 21, 1 89. Claridge, A. W., Trappe, J. M. & Hansen, K. (2009). Do fungi have a role as soil stabilizers and remediators after forest fire? Forest Ecology and Management, 257, 1063 1069. de Haan, A. & Walleyn, R. (2009). Studies in Galerina. Galerinae Flandriae (3). Fungi non Delineati, 46, 1 84. Dennis, R. W. G. (1961). Fungi venezuelani: IV. Agaricales. Kew Bulletin, 15, 67 156. Fannechere, G. (2005). Statistiques et notation des dimensions des spores. Bulletin Trimestriel de la Soci et e Mycologique de France, 121, 255 292. Fannechere, G. (2009). Mycom etre 2.02. Available online, 2. VII.2009. Retrieved from http://mycolim.free.fr/DOC_SML/ mycm202/Charg_Mycm202.htm, accessed 9 October 2014. Fries, E. M. (1836 1838 [1838]). Epicrisis systematicis mycologici, synopsis Hymenomycetum, I,. Uppsala. Gardes, M. & Bruns, T. D. (1993). ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes applications to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology, 2, 113 118. Garnica, S., Weiss, M., Walther, G. & Oberwinkler, F. (2007). Reconstructing the evolution of agarics from nuclear gene sequences and basidiospore ultrastructure. Mycological Research, 111, 1019 1029. Gouy, M., Guindon, S. & Gascuel, O. (2010). SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 27, 221 224. Gulden, G. (2012). Galerina Earle. In H. Knudsen & J. Vesterholt (Eds.), Funga Nordica. Agaricoid, Boletoid, Clavarioid, Cyphelloid and Gasteroid Genera, (pp. 886 903). Copenhagen: Norsvamp. 13 Gulden, G., Stensrud, ;., Shalchian-Tabrizi, K. & Kauserud, H. 2005. Galerina Earle: a polyphyletic genus in the consortium of dark-spored agarics. Mycologia, 97, 823 837. Hausknecht, A. & Zuccherelli, A. (1993). Ritrovamenti interessanti dal Ravennate. 1a parte. Alcune Agaricales a spore u scure. Bollettino del Gruppo Micologico G Brebrune o pi sadola, 36, 35 61. Holec, J. (2001). The genus Pholiota in central and western Europe. Libri Botanici, 20, 1 220. Horak, E. (1968). Synopsis generum Agaricalium (Die Gattungstypen der Agaricales). Beitr€ age zur Kryptogamenflora der Schweiz, 13, 1 741. Horak, E. (2005). R€ ohrlinge und Bl€ atterpilze in Europa unter der Mitarbeit von Anton Hausknecht (Bolbitiaceae) und P. A. Moreau (Alnicola),. Heidelberg: Elsevier Spektrum Akademischer. Kirk, P., Cannon, P. F., Minter, D. W. & Stalpers, J. A. (2008). The dictionary of fungi, (10th ed.). Wallingford: CAB International. Kornerup, A. & Wanscher, J.H. (1967). Methuen handbook of colour, (2nd ed.). London: Methuen & Co. K€ uhner, R. & Romagnesi, H. (1953). Flore anaytique des champignons sup erieurs (Agarics, Bolets, Chanterelles),. Paris: Masson. Lange, J.E. (1938). Studies in the Agarics of Denmark. Part XII. Hebeloma, Naucoria, Tubaria, Galera, Bolbitius, Pluteolus, Crepidotus, Pseudopaxillus, Paxillus. Dansk Botanisk Arkiv, 9, 1 104. Lange, J.E. (1940). Flora Agaricina Danica V, supplement (I IX). Copenhagen: The Danish Botanical Society. Lundell, S. & Nannfeldt, J. A. (1953). Fungi Exsiccati Suecici, 41 42, 2001 2100. Maddison, D. R. & Maddison, W. P. (2005). MacClade 4,, version 4.08 for OS X. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. Matheny, P.B. (2005). Improving phylogenetic inference of mushrooms with RPB1 and RPB2 nucleotide sequences (Inocybe; Agaricales). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 35, 1 20. Matheny, P. B. & Griffith, G. W. (2010). Mycoparasitism between Squamanita paradoxa and Cystoderma amianthinum (Cystodermateae, Agaricales). Mycoscience, 51, 456 461. Matheny, P. B., Aime, M. C., Bougher, N. L., Buyck, B., Desjardin D. E., . . . Horak, E. (2009). Out of the Palaeotropics? Historical biogeography and diversification of the cosmopolitan ectomycorrhizal mushroom family Inocybaceae. Journal of Biogeography, 36, 577 592. Matheny, P. B., Austin, E. A., Birkebak, J. M. & Wolfenbarger, A. D. (2010). Craterellus fallax, a Black Trumpet mushroom from eastern North America with a broad host range. Mycorrhiza, 20, 569 575. Matheny, P. B., Curtis, J. M., Hofstetter, V., Aime, M. C., Moncalvo, J.-M., . . . Ge, Z.-W. (2006). Major clades of Agaricales: a multilocus phylogenetic overview. Mycologia, 98, 982 995. Matheny, P. B., Vellinga, E. C., Bougher, N., Ceska, O., Moreau, P.-A., Neves, M. A. & Ammirati, J. (2007a). Taxonomy of displaced species of Tubaria. Mycologia, 99, 569 585. Matheny, P. B., Wang, Z., Binder, M., Curtis, J. M., Lim, Y.-W., . . . Nilsson, H. R. (2007b). Contributions of rpb2 and tef1 to the phylogeny of mushrooms and allies (Basidiomycota, Fungi). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 43, 430 451. McMullan-Fisher, S. J. M., May, T. W., Robinson, R. M., Bell, T. L., Lebel, T., . . . Catcheside, P. (2011). Fungi and fire in Australian ecosystems: a review of current knowledge, Downloaded by [University of Tennessee, Knoxville] at 13:56 31 October 2014 14 P. Brandon Matheny et al. management implications and future directions. Australian Journal of Botany, 59, 70 90. Moncalvo, J. M., Vilgalys, R., Redhead, S. A., Johnson, J. E., James, T. Y., . . . Aime, M. C. (2002). One hundred and seventeen clades of euagarics. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 23, 357 400. Moreau, P.-A. (2009). Revision des Naucorioideae, Geophileae et Cortinarieae naucorio€ıdes. In J.-C. Maire, P.-A. Moreau & G. Robich (Eds.), Compl ements a la Flore des Champignons sup erieurs du Maroc de G. Malençon & R. Bertault, (pp. 161 204). Nice: Confederatio Europaea Mycologia Mediterraneensis. Moser, M. (1954). Une pholiotine nouvelle interessante: Pholiotina funariophila n. sp. avec quelques remarques ecologiques. Bulletin de la Soci et e des Naturalistes d’Oyonnax, 8, 41 54. Moser, M. (1978). Fungorum Rariorum Icones Coloratae VII. Vaduz: Springer Verlag. Moser, M. (1983). Keys to Agarics and Boleti,, 4th ed. London: Roger Phillips. Moser, M. (2000). Beobachtungen zur Gattung Pachylepyrium Sing. Hoppea, 61, 267 274. O’Donnell, K. L., Cigelnik, E. & Benny, G.L. (1998). Phylogenetic relationships among the Harpellales and Kickxellales. Mycologia, 90, 624 639. Orton, P. D. (1960). New check list of British agarics and Boleti. Part III. Notes on genera and species in the list. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 43, 159 439. Petersen, G., Knudsen, H. & Seberg, O. (2010). Alignment, clade robustness and fungal phylogenetics Crepidotaceae and sister families revisited. Cladistics, 26, 62 71. Rambaut, A. (2009). FigTree: tree figure drawing tool,. Version 1.2.3. Institute of Evolutionary Biology: University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh. Retrieved from http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/, accessed 9 October 2014. Rees, B. J., Midgley, D. J., Marchant, A., Perkins, A. & Orlovich, D. A. (2013). Morphological and molecular data for Australian Hebeloma species do not support the generic status of Anamika. Mycologia, 105, 1043 1058. Romagnesi, H. (1937). Florule mycologique des bois de la  Grange et de l’Etoile (Seine-et-Oise). Basidiomycetes. Revue de Mycologie, 2, 85 95. Romagnesi, H. (1942). Description de quelques especes d’Agarics ochrospores. Bulletin Trimestriel de la Soci et e Mycologique de France, 58, 121 149. Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2003). MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19: 1572 1574. Singer, R. (1957). New genera of fungi X. Pachylepyrium. Sydowia, 11, 320 322. Singer, R. (1969). Mycoflora australis. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia, 29, 1 405. Singer, R. (1986). The Agaricales in modern taxonomy,, 4th ed. Koenigstein: Koeltz Scientific Books. Singer, R. & Moser, M. (1965). Forest mycology and forest communities in South America. 1. The early fall aspect of the mycoflora of the Cordillera Pelada (Chile). Mycopathologia et Mycologia Applicata, 26, 129 191. Smith, A. H. (1951). The North American species of Naematoloma. Mycologia, 43, 467 521. Smith, A. H. (1957). Additional new or unusual North American agarics. Beihefte zur Sydowia, 1, 46 61. Smith, A. H. & Hesler, L. R. (1968). The North American species of Pholiota. New York, NY: Hafner Publishing Company. Smith, A. H. & Singer, R. (1964). A monograph of the genus Galerina. New York, NY: Hafner Publishing Company. Stamatakis, A. (2006). RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihoodbased phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics, 22, 2688 2690. Thiers, B. (continuously updated). Index herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff,. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. Retrieved from http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/, accessed 9 October 2014. Veerkamp, M. (1998). Strong decline of carbonicolous fungi in the Netherlands. De Levende Natuur, 99, 62 66. Vilgalys, R. & Hester, M. (1990). Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology, 172, 4238 4246. Walther, G., Garnica, S. & Weiß, M. (2005). The systematic relevance of conidiogenesis modes in the gilled Agaricales. Mycological Research, 109, 525 544. Watling, R. & Gregory, N.M. (1993). British fungus flora. Agarics and Boleti 7. Cortinariaceae p.p,. Edinburgh: Royal Botanical Garden. White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. (1990). Amplification and directi sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenies. In M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky & T. J. White (Eds.), PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications, (pp. 315 322). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Wiens, J. J. (2006). Missing data and the design of phylogenetic analyses. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 39, 34 42. Wiens, J. J. & Moen, D. S. (2008). Missing data and the accuracy of Bayesian phylogenetics. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 46, 307 314. Wiens, J. J. & Tu, J. (2012). Highly incomplete taxa can rescue phylogenetic analyses from the negative impacts of limited taxon sampling. Public Library of Science ONE, 7, e42925. Associate Editor: Karen Hansen