AVERTISSEMENT
Ce document est le fruit d'un long travail approuvé par le
jury de soutenance et mis à disposition de l'ensemble de la
communauté universitaire élargie.
Il est soumis à la propriété intellectuelle de l'auteur. Ceci
implique une obligation de citation et de référencement lors
de l’utilisation de ce document.
D’autre part, toute contrefaçon, plagiat, reproduction
illicite encourt une poursuite pénale.
➢ Contact
SCD Nancy 1 : theses.sciences@scd.uhp-nancy.fr
LIENS
Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle. articles L 122. 4
Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle. articles L 335.2- L 335.10
http://www.cfcopies.com/V2/leg/leg_droi.php
http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/infos-pratiques/droits/protection.htm
IN?A.
GEORG-AUGUST-UNIVERSITAT
GOTTINGEN
Nancy-Université
←エゥウイ・カ ョオセ
•
Henri Poincaré
U.F.R. Sciences et Techniques Biologiques
Ecole Doctorale Ressources Procédés Produits
Environnement
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Thèse en co-tutelle
Présentée pour l’obtention du titre de docteur de l’Université Henri Poincaré, Nancy 1
En Biologie Végétale et Forestière
Par
Marlis Reich
Application des techniques de génotypage à haut débit pour l’étude
des communautés fongiques des sols
(Using high-throughput genotyping for monitoring communities of soil fungi)
Soutenance publique eu lieu le 28 mai 2009
Membres du jury :
Rapporteurs :
Gertrud LOHAUS
M. Roland MARMEISSE
Examinateurs :
Andrea POLLE
Xavier NESME
Jean-Pierre JACQUOT
Francis MARTIN
Marc BUEE
PhD, HDR, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen,
Allemagne
PhD, CR1 CNRS, HDR, Université Claude Bernard,
Lyon, France
PhD, professeur, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen,
Allemagne
PhD, HDR, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
PhD, professeur, Université Henri Poincaré Nancy, France
PhD, DR1 INRA, INRA-Nancy, France (Directeur de
thèse)
PhD, CR1, INRA-Nancy, France (Co-encadrant de thèse)
Laboratoire Interactions Arbres/Micro-organismes UMR 1136 INRA/UHP ; INRA Nancy
Büsgen Institut, Forstbotanik und Baumphysiologie, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
1
To a european spirit and an international exchange….
2
When I the starry courses know,
And Nature's wise instruction seek,
With light of power my soul shall glow…
On y voit le cours des étoiles ;
Ton âme, échappant à la nuit,
Pourra voguer à pleines voiles…
Erkennest dann der Sterne Lauf,
Und wenn Natur dich unterweist,
Dann geht die Seelenkraft dir auf…
(Faust I, Night, Johann Wolfgang Goethe)
3
Table of contents
1.
PREFACE
5
1.1. SUMMARY
5
1.2. OBJECTIVES OF MY THESIS
6
1.3. OVERVIEW ON THE CHAPTERS
7
2.
9
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION
2.1. MYCORRHIZA IN THE FOCUS OF RESEARCH
9
2.1.1.
MYCORRHIZA, A MUTUALISTIC SYMBIOSIS
9
2.1.2.
DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO STUDY MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI
10
2.2. VARIETY OF MYCORRHIZAL TYPES
13
2.2.1.
SEVEN FORMS OF MYCORRHIZA
13
2.2.2.
ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZA
13
2.2.3.
ECTOMYCORRHIZA
16
2.3. ECOLOGY OF MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI
19
2.3.1.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
19
2.3.2.
ECOLOGY OF ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI
20
2.3.3.
THE ECOLOGY OF ECTOMYCORRHIZAL COMMUNITIES
24
2.4. TECHNIQUES FOR IDENTIFYING MYCORRHIZAL FUNGAL SPECIES
33
2.4.1.
MORPHOTYPING
33
2.4.2.
MOLECULAR TECHNIQUES TO STUDY FUNGAL DIVERSITY
37
2.4.3.
CLOSING WORDS ABOUT DETECTION TECHNIQUES
58
3.
CHAPTER II: DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF AN OLIGONUCLEOTIDE
MICROARRAY TO CHARACTERIZE ECTOMYCORRHIZAL COMMUNITIES
4.
CHAPTER III: DIAGNOSTIC RIBOSOMAL ITS PHYLOCHIP FOR IDENTIFICATION OF
HOST INFLUENCE ON ECTOMYCORRHIZAL COMMUNITIES
5.
77
CHAPTER IV: 454 PYROSEQUENCING ANALYSES OF FOREST SOIL REVEAL AN
UNEXPECTED HIGH FUNGAL
6.
59
79
CHAPTER V: COMPARISON OF THE CAPACITY TO DESCRIBE FULLY IDENTIFIED
FUNGAL SPECIES USING THE TWO HIGHTHROUGHPUT TECHNIQUES 454
PYROSEQUENCING AND NIMBLEGEN PHYLOCHIP
101
4
7.
CHAPTER VI: QUANTITATIVE TRACEABILITY OF ECTOMYCORRHIZAL SAMPLES USING
ARISA
8.
CHAPTER VII: SYMBIOSIS INSIGHTS FROM THE GENOME OF THE MYCORRHIZAL
BASIDIOMYCETE LACCARIA BICOLOR.
9.
103
117
CHAPTER VIII: FATTY ACID METABOLISM IN THE ECTOMYCORRHIZAL FUNGUS
LACCARIA BICOLOR
119
10.
CHAPTER IX: CONCLUSIONS IN FRENCH
135
11.
CHAPTER X: CONCLUSIONS
141
12.
REFERENCES OF INTRODUCTION AND CONCLUSIONS
153
5
1. Preface
1.1.Summary
Forests are highly complex ecosystems and harbor a rich biodiversity above-ground and
below-ground. In the forest soil a multilayer array of microorganisms can be found occupying
various niches. They play essential roles in the mineralization of organic compounds and
nutrient cycling (Fitter et al., 2005). Mycorrhizal fungi are a highly abundant and functionally
very important group of soil micro-organisms. They live in mutualistic symbiosis with the
plants and deliver their plant hosts with nutrients and water and receive in return
carbohydrates. Many environmental factors influence the richness and the composition of
mycorrhizal communities. They can be grouped into biotic and abiotic factors. As
mycorrhizal fungi are nearly wholly dependent on plant-derived carbohydrates it is not
astonishing, that plant communities have a main impact on structure and function of
mycorrhizal communities. This is achieved in a number of ways, e.g. by the host plant
species, the age or successional status of the host tree/forest or physiological features such as
litter fall, root turnover or root exudations of carbons (Johnson et al., 2005). Recent research
focused e.g. on the effect of host taxonomic distance on ectomycorrhizal (ECM)
communities. It was reported that communities sharing host trees of similar taxonomic status
showed similar structure compared to communities associated to more taxonomical distinct
host trees (Ishida et al., 2003). Anyhow, differences in ECM communities were observed
when they were associated to two congeneric host trees with different leaf physiology (Morris
et al., 2008). An important abiotic factor in boreal and temperate forests is the climate change
over seasons. Temporal patterns of ECM fungi occur during a year and can be explained by
ecological preferences of fungal species and enzymatic adaptation to changing weather and
changing resource conditions (Buée et al., 2005; Courty et al., 2008). All these studies reveal
the diversity of factors and their impact on mycorrhizal communities. As mycorrhizal
communities are playing an important role in forest ecosystems, the dynamics of mycorrhizal
communities as response to environmental factors have to be studied to understand the global
dynamic and biodiversity of forest ecosystems.
But how can we study and describe in detail such complex communities? In the last decades
molecular biological detection techniques were developed and used alongside with classical
morphological and anatomical-based methods. Especially the determination of ITS as DNA
barcode for fungi and the adjustment of PCR conditions for the amplification of the total
6
fungal community opened the way for more detailed community studies (Horton & Bruns,
2001). Traditional molecular techniques such as ITS-fingerprinting or Sanger-sequencing
were widely applied (reviewed in Anderson, 2006). However, these techniques are limited by
the number of samples, which can be processed in a realistic time frame (Mitchell &
Zuccharo, 2006). Identification of fungal taxa can nowadays be expanded to high-throughput
molecular diagnostic tools, such as phylochips (a microarray to detect species) and 454
sequencing. The ongoing implementation of array technique led to its high-throughput
capacity, as thousands of features can be fixed to the carrier glass. In the case of phylochips,
features are oligonucleotides targeting barcode genes of the species of interest. So far,
phylochips were used for the identification of bacterial species from complex environmental
samples (Brodie et al., 2006) or for few genera of pathogenic (Lievens et al., 2003, 2005) and
composting fungi (Hultman et al., 2008). 454 sequencing is a newly developed sequencing
technique combining the complete sequence process covering all subsequent steps from the
barcode region of interest to the finished sequence (Margulies et al., 2005). In first
experiments 454 sequencing technique was used to sequence genomes (Andrie et al., 2005) or
transcriptomes (Bainbridge et al., 2006). With the ongoing development metagenomic
analysis were carried out. Bacterial community structures of different ecosystems were
described with more than over 10,000 sequences (Huber et al., 2007). So far, no studies were
published on fungal communities by using 454 sequencing. Phylochip and 454 sequencing
analysis started to revolutionize the understanding of bacterial community structure and have
great potential to get new-insights into fungal community structure.
1.2.Objectives of my thesis
My thesis focused on the impact of host trees and seasonal changes on the fungal community
composition. The main objectives were i) to describe the richness of ECM communities in
beech and spruce plantations over a time-scale of one year and ii) to report the impact of the
host tree species on the fungal community diversity. As described above high-throughput
diagnostic tools have not been yet applied in studies focusing on fungi in forest ecosystems.
Therefore, my goal was i) to develop and test a high-throughput phylochip to identify fungi
on their ITS region, ii) to apply the developed phylochip in ecological studies, iii) to use 454
sequencing for exhaustive studies of fungal communities in a forest ecosystem, and iv) to
report advantages and pitfalls of these two high-throughput approaches when used in fungal
ecology studies.
7
1.3.Overview on the chapters
Chapter I: I give an overview on the research focusing on environmental factors, which
influence mycorrhizal community composition and dynamics. Additionally, I discuss the pros
and cons of detection techniques and their application in fungal community analysis.
Chapter II: We report the development of a small-scale phylochip to detect ECM fungi in
mycorrhizal root tip samples of beech and spruce on our experimental site in Breuil,
Burgundy, France. The phylochips were developed over two generations, first as a nylon,
later as a glasslide array. The two generations of phylochips were evaluated by hybridizing
artificial fungal community mixes. Results of environmental sample analysis were compared
to results obtained by ECM root tip morphotyping and ITS-Sanger-sequencing on the same
PCR product used for phylochip analysis.
Chapter III: We studied the impact of host trees, beech and spruce, and of seasonal changes
on ECM communities in Breuil by using a large-scale phylochip. Design and development of
the NimbleGen phylochip are described in detail. The NimbleGen phylochip differs to the
phylochips described in chapter II in its size, as 23,393 fungal ITS-sequences were used to
create 84,891 species-specific oligonucleotides for 9,678 fungal species. Oligonucleotides
were spotted in four replicates on the phylochip. Results of phylochip analysis were validated
with results of cloning/Sanger-sequencing.
Chapter IV: We describe the influence of tree species on total fungal community diversity in
Breuil by using 454 sequencing. Soil samples were taken under two deciduous tree species
(beech and oak) and under four conifers (spruce, fir, Douglas fir, pine). The ITS1-region was
tagged for amplification. Between 26,000 and 36,000 sequences, depending of treatments,
were generated, corresponding to 580-1,000 operational taxonomic units (OTU) (3%
dissimilarity) for each treatment. Influence of tree species on fungal communities is
discussed.
Chapter V: We compared the two high-throughput techniques, large-scale phylochip and 454
sequencing, against each other. Therefore fungal communities under plantations of spruce and
beech of the experimental site of Breuil were analyzed on their ITS1-region. With this
experiment, we tried i) to understand pros and cons of one technique over the other, ii) to
explore favored possible fields of application of each technique and, iii) to discuss possible
linkages of the two techniques in in-depth analysis of ecological studies.
8
Chapter VI: We tested the quantification of three different ECM fungal species associated
with two different host tree species using automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis
(ARISA). The use of this technique for semi-quantitative traceability of the ECM status of
tree roots, based on the relative heights of the peaks in the electropherograms, is shown.
During my thesis, I participated in the Laccaria-Genome-project and was responsible for the
annotation of the genes of the fatty acid metabolism. In the context of the consortium I
contributed in the publication of two articles.
Chapter VII: We report the genome sequence of the ECM fungi L. bicolor and highlight gene
sets involved in rhizosphere colonization and symbiosis. The 65-megabase genome assembly
contains 20,000 predicted protein-encoding genes and a very large number of transposons and
repeated sequences. The predicted gene inventory of the L. bicolor genome points to
previously unknown mechanisms of symbiosis operating in biotrophic mycorrhizal fungi.
Chapter VIII: We explored the genome sequence of L. bicolor for genes involved in fatty
acid metabolism. The pathways of fatty acid biosynthesis and degradation of L. bicolor were
reconstructed using lipid composition, gene annotation and transcriptional analysis.
Similarities and differences of theses pathways in comparison to other organisms and
ecological strategies are discussed.
Chapter IX: I give some concluding remarks over the different detection techniques used
during my thesis and discuss their pros and cons and possible fields of application. In some
cases it might be interesting to link different techniques to get a complete view on fungal
communities.
9
2. Chapter I: Introduction
2.1.Mycorrhiza in the focus of research
2.1.1. Mycorrhiza, a mutualistic symbiosis
A complex array of organisms have emerged since the genesis of life. Organisms which
occupy the same niche are often forced to interact due to their close proximity. Interaction
between organsisms occur in three different forms: (1) parasitism, where only one of the
interaction partner benefits while the other one is harmed, (2) commensalism, where one
partner benefits without harming the other, and (3) mutualism, where the fitness of both
partners increases (Egger & Hibbett, 2004). Mutualistic symbiosis is the most prevalent
interaction formed between the roots of land plants and fungi. Frank (1885) was the first one
to recognize and describe the mutualistic aspects of what is now called “mycorrhiza” (Greek:
roots of fungi). Nearly 95% of all land plants form mycorrhiza, including some non-vascular
plants, ferns and other seedless vascular plants (Peterson et al., 2004). It is assumed that fungi
have played a crucial role in the colonization of land by plants (Remy et al., 1994; Selosse &
Le Tacon, 1998). The oldest fossil evidence of mycorrhiza is dated to the Ordovician period,
460 million years ago, which coincides with the first appearance of land plants (Redecker et
al., 2000).
In mycorrhiza nutrient exchange takes place between the symbiotic partners. The fungus
delivers the plant with nutrients and water and receives in return glucose and in much lesser
amount fructose, which are formed during the photosynthesis by the plant (Buscot et al.,
2000). Mycorrhiza enhances also the fitness of the plant by increasing their resistance against
soil borne pathogens and toxic elements while also improving their drought tolerance (Smith
& Read, 1997). These features make mycorrhiza, when associated with forest trees and crop
plants, environmentally as economically interesting (Grove & Le Tacon, 1993; reviewed by
Newsham et al., 1995).
10
2.1.2. Different approaches to study mycorrhizal fungi
Considerable gaps still exist in our knowledge concerning the biology of mycorrhiza. To gain
more insights into this relationship recent research has used ecological, physiological or
genomic approaches to allow a broader understanding of the features and functionings of
mycorrhiza. Ecologically, a comprehensive survey of the relationship between an organism to
the environment is performed. “Environment” comprises of other organisms sharing the same
niche or other biotic and abiotic factors (Agrawal et al., 2007). In the context of mycorrhizal
research, this means to study the influence of environmental factors on the community
structure by looking at the distribution and abundance of different mycorrhizal species.
Mechanical, biochemical and physical funtions of organisms are studied when using a
physiological approach (Garland & Carter Jr, 1994). The plant-fungus interaction has been
especially studied on the basis of nutrient exchange (Buscot et al., 2000; Nehls et al., 2007) or
of pre-mycorrhizal signal exchange (Martin, 2006). Finally, the genomic approach considers
the organization, structure and history of genomes (Mauricio, 2005) and is the basis of many
other “omics” such as transcriptomics or proteomics (Ge et al., 2003; Figure 1).
P!c*,olile
h&eI...........,
pt""' .... ..,
I •• alid .....
Fig. 1:Integrating “omic” information. With the availability of complete genome and transcriptome
sequences (genomics), functional genomic and proteomic (or “omic”) approaches are used to map the
trancriptome (comlete set of interactions), phenome (complete set of pheotypes) and localizome (localization of
all transcripts and proteins) of a given organism. Integrating omic information should help to reduce the
problems caused by false positives and false negatives obtained from single omic appporaches, lead to better
functional annotations of gene products and the functional relationships between them, and allow for the
formulation of increasingly relevant biological hypotheses (after Hui et al., 2003).
11
Whitham et al. (2006; 2008) developed the idea that genomic studies help to understand
community structure and ecosystem processes. They showed that the genotype of a species
influences the fitness of another species in the same niche constituting an indirect genetic
interaction. This interaction alters species composition and abundace in that niche causing a
new community and phenotype ecosystem to develop (Figure 2). To understand the genomic
components underlying these phenotypes the molecular mechanism regulating the interaction
between the host plant and fungi should be studied in detail. Several genomes from fungi with
different ecological background were recently sequenced and released (for an overview see
Xu et al., 2006; Martin & Selosse, 2008; Chapter VIII), allowing for comparative genome
analysis to determine specific genes or gene structuring caused by different fungal life-styles
(Chapter IX).
a Beaven avold hlgh-tannln tree.
<
セ
,.
セ
·,
10
•
Nセ _ o.oos
•
Lo • • •
•
• • o•
セ
c Tannin. reduce nltragen mlnerallzatlon
Follarcheml.try
........
0
1
1
l
zc:;z
イセ
ゥGセ
j セ여
セ
セ
0.006
0.004
t 0.001
,n:::;! セ
セ
0
+-T-T-T-rc-,.
5
10
15
10 15
Conde",ed tannin input.
(g pel" m' pe'yea'l
d Tannin, are posltlvely correlated wlth
b Bea""r preference atrect!i tree fitne••
and stand compo.ltlon
"
fine·raot production
Ilelo,e
-
......
.Syea... late,
• F,emon'
Troo fitne..
FI
0
0
0.000 0
" Ba,k conde",ed
tanni",
•
0
Il.>ckcro.. and
""ffowleaf
0.15
0.10
•
•
. .
0
0.10 . 1
• 5/
."
•.00 t M セ M L l
"
Ol010W
" Folia, conde",ed 'anni",
Fig. 2: Feedback relationships. Selection pressures that are exerted on foundation species can affect
interactions with other species, which in turn might feed back to affect the fitness of the individual that produced
the phenotype. Here we show how the condensed tannin phenotype in the poplar could affect the foraging of an
important herbivore, nutrient cycling and nutrient acquisition. Panels (a) and (b) show that the beaver Castor
canadensis is an important agent of natural selection in which interactions with a foundation tree species could
affect many other species that depend on the tree for their survival. Beavers selectively fell trees low in
condensed tannins, which in turn affects the fitness of different tree genotypes and cross types. After 5 years of
selective tree felling, cross types that were high in condensed tannins nearly tripled in abundance, whereas the
cross type lowest in condensed tannins had significantly declined in abundance and the cross type intermediate
in condensed tannins (F1 hybrids) showed an intermediate increase in abundance. Panels (c) and (d) illustrate a
potentially important feedback loop that presumably interacts through the microbial community to affect the
tree’s performance. Panel (c) suggests that an increased concentration of condensed tannins in leaves of
individual trees can inhibit the microbially mediated process of nitrogen mineralization. In turn, variation in soil
nutrients could feed back to affect the tree’s investment into fine-root production to forage for limiting nutrients,
which can affect tree performance. (after Whitham et al., 2006)
12
«Mycorrhiza in the focus of research»
• mycorrhiza is a mutualistic symbiosis between plant roots and fungi
• the interacting partners exchange nutrients
• mycorrhizal research uses various scientific disciplines such as ecology, physiology and
genomics
• ecological genomics can help to understand community structure and ecosystem
processes
13
2.2.Variety of mycorrhizal types
2.2.1. Seven forms of mycorrhiza
Based on structural features seven different mycorrhizal types have been described which can
be subdivised into two groups; the ectomycorrhiza (ECM) and the group of endomycorrhiza
(Peterson et al., 2004). The ectomycorrhiza is characterized by a hyphal mantle ensheating
the roots and an intercellular hyphal net. Conversely, in the group of endomycorrhiza, fungal
hyphae invade the root cells. Differences in the nature and the structure of the intracellular
hyphal development can be described for the members of the endomycorrhizal group. The
arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM), ericoid mycorrhiza, arbutoid mycorrhiza, monotropoid
mycorrhiza, orchid mycorrhiza and the ectendo mycorrhiza form the group of
endomycorrhiza (Figure 3; Table 1). Only the arbuscular and the ectomycorrhiza will be
discussed further, as they are the most commonly formed plant-fungal relationships formed in
economical and ecological important plant species (Finlay, 2005).
2.2.2. Arbuscular mycorrhiza
The AM is the most ubiquitous type of mycorrhiza and is formed by 80% of all land plants
(Smith & Read, 1997). It is especially formed by herbaceous plants and several tropical tree
species, but it has also been reported to be formed by liverworts, ferns and by the geological
“old” conifers (all but Pinaceae and Gnetum) (Peterson et al., 2004). Beside this huge number
of plant species (estimated 23,000) only ~160 fungal species were described to form AM, all
belong to the phylum of Glomeromycota (Rosendahl & Stukenbrock, 2004; Table 1). It is
assumed that much more fungal AM species exist as up to now only few biotopes and plant
species were analysed in detail and nearly every new field study reveals undescribed species
(Oehl et al., 2003; Wubet et al., 2003).
During the development of AM, a fungal hyphae attaches to the root surface and enters the
root via an apressorium profilerating as intracellular hyphae over the root cells. Some hyphal
ends branch dichotomously and form the so-called arbuscules (Figure 3, Figure 9). The host
plasma membrane is elaborated over all branches of the arbuscules increasing the contact area
between the plant and the fungus (Smith & Read, 2008). Here, nutrient exchange takes place.
The fungus takes up glucose from the plant, while delivering the plant especially with water
and phosphate, but also with amino acids and some cations such as e.g. Mg2+ and K+ (van der
Heijden & Sanders, 2002).
14
Fig. 3: Distinct mycorrhizal types.
• thin mantle (M)
• Hartig net (arrows)
• intracellular hyphae (arrow heads)
• hyphae penetrate over epidermal cell
(arrow head)
• pelotons (hyphal coils) in cortical cells
(arrows)
• degradation of hyphal coils (double
arrowheads)
•
•
•
•
hyphal mantle (M)
Hartig net (arrowheads)
fungal peds (arrows)
finger-like projections of host-derived
wall material
• only in epidermal cells
• hyphae enter cell through through
thickened cell wall (arrowhead)
• hyphal complexes (HC)
• hyphal mantle (M)
• paraepidermal Hartig net (arrowheads)
• intracellular hyphal complex (HC)
• appressorium (A) to penetrate epidermal
cell (E)
• frequently hyphal coils (arrow)
• intercellular hyphae (arrowhead) in
cortex (C)
• arbuscules (double arrowhead)
• - some fungi form vesicles (V)
• formation of a mantle (M) that covers
considerable portions of lateral roots
• Hartig net, hyphae between root cells
(arrowheads)
• extraradical mycelium (arrows) with
hyphae or rhizomorphs that grow into
surrounding soil
structure
septed fungi, Asco- unsepted fungi,
Mycobiontes /Basidiomycetes
Glomeromycota,
and one Endogone
some
ectomycorrhiza
forming fungi
Hymenoscyphus
ericae,
Oidiodendron
griseum, some
Asco/Basidiomycetes
some
ectomycorrhiza
forming fungi
Basidiomycetes a limited
number of
Ascomycetes
Pinus and
Larix
Orchidaceae
Monotropaceae
Ericaceae,
Epacridaceae,
Empetraceae
more than 80% of
all land plants
Pinaceae,
Betulaceae,
Salicaceae,
Myrtaceae,
Dipterocarpaceae
Fagaceae
Photobiont
Number
Form of
mycorrhiza
A
Ectomycorrhiza
B1
Arbuscular
mycorrhiza
B2
Arbutoid
mycorrhiza
Arbutus,
Arctostaphylos
and several
genera of
Pyrolaceae
B4
Ericoid
mycorrhiza
B5
Monotropoid
mycorrhiza
B6
Orchid
mycorrhiza
B3
Ectendo
mycorrhiza
15
16
2.2.3. Ectomycorrhiza
In comparison to the AM, only approximately 8,000 plant species (3% of seed plants) form
ECM (Smith & Read, 2008 t see a list of genera). Although this number is much smaller than
that for plant species associated to AM, these host trees are disproportionately represented on
a global scale. Vast areas in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres are populated by
Pinaceae, Abietaceae, Betulaceae, Salicaceae, Myrtaceae, Dipterocarpaceae and Fagaceae
(Finlay, 2005). While previous census placed the number of ECM fungal (EMF) species at
approximately 5,500, ongoing research (especially in tropical forests) has detected many
undescribed EMF species. Therefore, the number of EMF species is currently estimated
between 7,000-10,000 species (Taylor & Alexander, 2005). Most of EMF are Basidiomycota
and occur essentially in the order of Agaricales, but some Ascomycota are also EMF. Only
one genus in the Zygomycota, Endogone, forms ECM (Table 1; extensive list of fungal
species can be found in Smith & Read, 2008). Over the last years it has also become evident
that non-Agaricales play an important role in ECM formation (Weiss et al., 2004). The family
of Sebacinaceae has especially attracted interest as their members very often form ECM and
other mycorrhizal forms at the same time, building large networks between differently
mycorrhized plants (Selosse et al., 2007).
ECM is formed on the terminal feeder roots of plants and is comprised of three domains.
1) The mantle, a multi-layer hyphal structure, formed by the fungus on the external face of the
root tip. 2) The fungal mycelium which extends out from the mantle surface into the soil,
forming sometimes root-like structures, the rhizomorphs (Agerer, 2001) (Figure 9). The
fungus degrades N- and P-compounds contained in soil organic matter by metabolic enzymes
which are excreted from the extraradical hyphae. The excrition leads also to a dissolution of
soil mineral particles and minerals (e.g. Ca2+, Mg2+ or K+) (Leake et al., 2002). 3) The Hartig
net, comprised of hyphae originating from the mantle, develops between root epidermal and
cortical (in conifers) cells and forms a complex nutrient exchange interface over the surface
of these cells (Smith & Read, 1997; Figure 3). Here, nutrient exchange takes place. The
fungus takes up sugar from the plant, while delivering the plant with water and nutrients.
17
“Variety of mycorrhizal types”
• up to now seven different mycorrhizal types are described
• the most common mycorrhizal forms are the arbuscular- (AM) and the ectomycorrhiza
(ECM)
• AM is formed by 80% of all land plants, but only a relative small fungal group,
Glomeromycota, is involved
• ~ 7,000-10,000 fungal species form ECM
• both types of mycorrhiza form organs and cell structures, which are adapted to
nutrient exchange between the host plant and the fungus and foraging in the soil
18
Box 1: Secrets of intraterrestial aliens
Only morphotyping was used in early mycorrhizal research to identify AMF (see section
“Morphotyping”). For this reason the Glomeromycota were described as a group of only approx.
150 species (Smith & Read, 1997). It was assumed that they were host non-specific as in culture
studies the few studied types showed promiscuous colonization (reviewed in detail by Helgason
& Fitter, 2005). This picture changed with the use of molecular biological approaches. Up to 20
associated fungal species were found on the roots of one plant species containing primarily new
species unknown from culture collections (Wubet et al., 2003; Hijri et al., 2006; Wu et al.,
2007). These new techniques enabled tracing and description of AMF in natural ecosystems, but
ecological studies of AMF communities are hindered, as the genome structure of
Glomeromycota causes difficulty to identify what constititutes an individual fungal strain
(Rosendahl, 2008). Diversity studies very often use the ribosomal gene pool of a community to
describe diversity. In the nucleus of common eukaryotes 75-100 identical copies of the
ribosomal genes can be found. As Glomeromycota spores are coenocytic they contain between
2,000 – 20,000 nuclei (Helgason & Fitter, 2005) and studies on the ribosomal genes have
revealed genetic variants in a single spore (Sanders et al., 1995). This has also been seen for
other genes (Corradi et al., 2004) leading to two different hypotheses concerning the genetic
structure of AMF. The first hypothesis considers AMF as homokaryon with identical nuclei
each coding for all genetic variations (e.g. Pawlowska & Taylor, 2004). In the counter-argument
Glomeromycota are seen as heterokaryon, where several genetically distinct nuclei cohabit in
one spore (e.g. Kuhn et al., 2001; Hijri & Sanders, 2005) (discussed in more detail Young,
2008). Although a part of the Glomus intraradices genome has been sequenced (Martin et al.,
2008), the secret of Glomeromycota has not been resolved.
Fig. 4: The two hypotheses for genome
organization in AMFs.
a) Homokaryon. Each nucleus has multiple copies of
the genome. b) Heterokaryon. A consortium of
mutually complementary nuclear lineages, none of
which can survive without the other (after Young,
2008).
19
2.3.Ecology of mycorrhizal fungi
2.3.1. Environmental factors
Ecology studies the relationship of an organism/organism group to the environment. When
studying the impact of environment on mycorrhizal communities, several main factors can be
considered. Abiotic factors such as climate, natural conditions/ disasters or soil and soil
features can be assesed. Biotic factors, that affect mycorrhizal groups, are host plants,
organisms living in the same niche or more globally, all other organisms living on the host
plants (e.g. insects). Human activities also have a high impact on mycorrhizal community
structure. For example, land management restructures the soil or changes plant composition
and density and thus effects symbiotic communities. While not every factor affecting the
environment has a direct influence on mycorrhizal community, alterations to one of the main
factors may change community structure indirectly (Figure 5). Although flow diagrams can
help us to understand the connections between environmental factors and the studied
organism, it should be kept in mind that ecological relationships are much more dense and
variable and “factor research” can only give us a glimpse into this complex ecosystem.
"ind of he,bi"oryor
イL GャNイゥョセZ
Iluman impael,
• I.nd man.gemen!
• acidif,e"ion
'Iiming
• fenili,e,
• hc,,'y mC1a'
• le.fehe"'ing
'phi""", su<k;ng
.'
···
,,··
,
Climat.' 1','ur.1 di"'lcr:
• len'l"'ralUr<:
, p=ipnaloon
• oronc
'CO,
• fin:
, noodUlg
,
,,
,,,
,,
0,.. ... 11 innu<ncc of ho>! plonts:
• """,ies
• pl.nl eommunity
• age! sucecsion of Ir"" stand
, h"allh
5<>il:
'type ofso,1
• spali.! helerog"nily
• Slmelu",
• mo;"u",
• pl!
Fig. 5: Factors influencing mycorrhizal community structure. Some factors have an indirect
influence on mycorrhizal communities (dotted lines) by changing active soil structure or plant health/stress.
Constant lines represent direct influence.
20
2.3.2. Ecology of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
2.3.2.1.
Biotic factors influencing arbuscular mycorrhizal communities
Host plant
Using molecular biological approaches, the hypothesis of non-host-specificity of AMF was
rechecked. Vandenkoornhuyse et al. (2003) reported distinct AMF communities on three coexisting grass species. These results were supported by the work of Golotte et al. (2004), who
demonstrated the selection pressure of plants on AMF communities by replacing indigenous
vegetation with monocultures of grass species, and by Wubet et al. (2006) who studied the
AMF communities of two coexisting conifers in Ethiopia. Pivato et al. (2007) demonstrated
that plant genotypes can influence fungal community structure. While in this experiment strict
host plant specificity was not shown, a preferential association of AMF was found with four
annual Medicago species. The abundance of the fungi in the roots differed with the plant
genotype. All obtained sequences belonged to the Glomus genus and mainly to the Glomus A
group, which is in agreement with its wide distribution and its prevalence in roots of legumes
(Pivato et al., 2007). AMF genus diversity associated with one plant species has also been
shown for Prunus africana in Ethiopia. Most abundant were Glomeraceae species, but
Diversisporaceae and Archaeosporaceae were also found. Of the 22 species described, 20
were new to science (Wubet et al., 2003).
The age of the host plant can also evoke a drastic shift in AM community composition. First
and second year seedlings of two tropical plant species were used to demonstrate a strong
shift of their associated AMF composition. Species that dominated in the first year were
almost entirely replaced by previously rare species in the second year (Husband et al., 2002a,
2002b). This suggests that the diversification of communities is based on the function of a
number of plant-associated variables and that AMF composition change with the need of the
plant.
21
Herbivory
Above-ground herbivory normally has a negative effect on mycorrhizal colonization and
diversity (Gehring & Whitham, 2002). Additionally, the type of herbivore are a key to belowground effect (Wearn & Gange, 2007). The influence of soil invertebrates on mycorrhiza is
less studied (reviewed by Gange & Brown, 2002), but it is still unknown if these interactions
result in a shift in AMF community composition.
“Biotic factors influencing arbuscular mycorrhizal communities”
factor
effect on AMF community
plant species
• preferential association
plant age
• strong fungal community shift; diversification is based on function
and is adopted to the need of the plant
2.3.2.2.
Abiotic factors influencing arbuscular mycorrhizal communities
Site effect
Soil structure has a huge influence on mycorrhizal community composition. Rosendahl &
Stuckenbrock (2004) described the community structure of AMF in undisturbed coastal
grassland where fungi showed a spatial distribution. Dominant fungal species covered up to
10 m along a transect, while others formed small individual mycelia clusters. The authors
assumed that species, which spread mainly by vegetative growth, are more abundant in
undisturbed systems, while sporulating species favor disturbed systems. Oehl et al. (2003)
compared the species diversity in arable soil on sites with low, moderate (with 7-year crop
rotation) and high land use (monoculture). They found that species richness was lowered at
the high-input monocroping site, with a preferential selection of species that colonized roots
slowly but formed spores rapidly. While each site had its own specialistic species, some
species were present on all three sites. A similar picture arises when looking on AMF
communities of primary successional sites, e.g. those of a volcanic desert on Mont Fuji (Wu
et al., 2007). Here, fungal species diversity increased with decreasing altitude as did the
diversity of plant species, an effect most likely due to less soil erosion. The dominant species
found at higher altitudes remained dominant at lower altitudes (Wu et al., 2007).
22
Edaphic factors
Physical soil features, such as moisture, have an ambigous influence on AMF species. AMF
species richness in a Populus – Salix stand in a semiarid riparian ecosystem were positively
related to gravimetric soil moisture and declined with distance from the closeby water channel
(Beauchamp et al., 2006). Conversely, standing water in soil has a negative affect on AMF
species (Miller, 2000). Low soil pH negatively affects AMF species richness (Toljander et al.,
2008) and colonization rate (Göransson et al., 2008). Increasing heavy metal concentrations
generally decreases AMF richness (Zarei et al., 2008). Among the few species colonizing
plants on heavy metal polluted sites, distinctive abundance was reported. At a zinc waste in
Poland the Glomus sp. HM-CL4 was the most effective colonizer, while four other species
were found at moderate or low abundance (Turnau et al., 2001).
N-deposition
As mycorrhizal fungi are involved in the nitrogen cycle, they are affected by anthropogenic
N-fertilization/-deposition. Community shifts favoring Glomus aggregatum, Gl. leptotichum
and Gl. geosporum were reported in coastal sage scrub or Gigaspora gigantea and Glomus
mosseae in tallgrass prairie after N-fertilization (reviewed in Rilling et al., 2002). It was
hypothesized that due to increased N availability in the soil, P became the limiting factor
instead of N thereby resulting in a community shift toward species adapted to low P (Rilling
et al., 2002) rather than accumulation of nitrophilic species (Toljander et al., 2008).
Climate change
Among all the factors related to global environmental change, elevated CO2 is the most
studied with respect to mycorrhizal fungi. The response of AMF through increase of biomass
or colonization rate is controversial (Drigo et al., 2008). Wolf et al. (2003) reported an effect
of CO2 on AMF community composition, while in another study the speed of CO2 increase
influenced the AMF community: when CO2 was elevated in a single high step composition
changed sharply, while for gradual elevation no response was recognized (Drigo et al., 2008).
23
“Abiotic factors influencing arbuscular mycorrhizal communities”
factor
effect on AMF community
plant species
• host preference
plant age
• strong fungal community shift; diversification is based on function
and is adapted to the need of the plant
soil structure
• undisturbed system: fungi spread mainly by vegetative growth
• disturbed sites: sporulating species
• specialists for specific sites
• generalists
soil moisture
• depend on intensity
• standing water negative effect
soil pH
• low pH has a negative effect
heavy metal
• negative effect
N-fertilization
• shift of community
elevated CO2
• strenth of elevation step influences community
24
2.3.3. The ecology of ectomycorrhizal communities
2.3.2.3.
Biotic factors influencing ectomycorrhizal communities
Host plant
Host plant composition is one of the major factors influencing EMF community structure
(Anderson, 2006). Early research demonstrated that certain EMF show high host specificity
while others have a broad host range (reviewed in Johnson et al., 2005). Host-specific
associations were described for Pinaceae with Suillus and Rhizopogon species (Molina &
Trappe, 1982). Strong host specificity was found for the EMF genera of Suillus, Rhizopogon,
Alnicola or Leccinum. Leccinum versipelle, L. scabrum and L. holopus were exclusively
associated with Betula species. Other genera, such as Cenococcum, Clavulina or Laccaria are
more promiscuous as they can associate with different plant species (Breitenbach & Kränzlin,
1984-2000). With the development of high-throughput molecular tools, preferences of EMF
in a community can now be studied in detail (Horton & Bruns, 2001; Anderson, 2006). Ishida
and colleagues (2007) studied EMF associated to eight different plant species of three
different plant families in a mixed conifer-broadleaf forest. Host taxonomy influenced fungal
composition and taxonomically close host species harbored the most similar EMF
communities. In large part, the same host-specific EMF were shared between species of one
genus (Figure 6). Beside host-specific fungi, EMF species with a broad host range on both
angiosperms and gymnosperms hosts were also found. With a similar goal, Morris et al.
(2008) studied the host-influence of congeneric trees on EMF communities. They sampled
EMF under the deciduous Quercus douglasii and the evergreen Q. wislizeni. Their results
showed that host species of the same genera can generate very different EMF communities,
with only 40 shared of 140 fungal. The two oak species, though from the same genus, had a
very different leaf physiology and structure, which might be also influencing EMF species
composition.
Fig. 6: Percentage occurrence of EMF
species in relation to their host ranges.
,
The relative abundance of mycorrhizas was
calculated in each host range group. To test the
bias of the observed proportion of each host range
class, observed values were compared with values
obtained after 1000 randomizations. In a
randomization, each EMF species was randomly
assigned to the number of host trees equal to its
observed
frequency.
Asterisks
indicate
significantly biased values (P < 0.05). Mean
numbers of EMF species obtained from
randomizations were shown in the parentheses.
(after Ishida et al., 2007)
25
Ishida et al. (2007) assumed that host preference at any taxonomical level may provide new
niches and support higher local species richness. The results of Tedersoo et al. (2008) support
these hypothesis. They described EMF communities of three tree species of a Tasmanian wet
sclerophyll forest and found striking differences between the two pioneer, fire-dependent tree
species Eucalyptus regnans and Pomaderris apetala. The authors, following the hypothesis of
Ishida and coworkers, concluded that these two tree species exclude each other through
priority effect and hardly compatible EMF.
Sucessional state of forest
Mason et al. (1982) were the first group to consider the influence of forest age on EMF
diversity. When they were looking at Betula pendula trees, which had recently colonized
agricultural soil, they found two different groups of fungi over time: the “early-stage” fungi,
which were associated to trees in their pioneer phase (young, first-generation trees on
disturbed forest sites), and the “late-stage” fungi found in climax vegetation (after canopy
closure of the forest site). Danielson (1984) added a third category, the “multi-stage” fungi:
fungi that are present throughout the life of the stand. The main critic of the model proposed
by Mason et al. was that their conclusions were based on an experiment conducted with a
stand growing on agricultural soil. This is not a realistic circumstance for forests (Smith &
Read, 2008). Another model had been developed earlier by Pugh (1980) who transferred the
ecological strategy model from plants on fungi. The model distinguishs between fungi, which
can be found on ruderal or pertubated sites (“R” fungi), and fungi, which are competitive and
stress-tolerant, that can be found on mature forest sites (“C” and “S” fungi). The main
difference of these two fungal groups is their type of reproduction. “R” fungi possess small,
cordless basidiocarps, are short-living and reproduction occurs mainly through spores. “C”
and “S” species produce larger and more resistant basidiocarps and build long, widely
distributed mycorrhizal patches (Frankland, 1998; Figure 7). A study by Jonsson et al.
(1999a), which looked at EMF associated with seedlings and old trees of Scots pine in an old
virgin boreal forest, supports the concept of a mycelial network in older stands. They reported
a very similar fungal species composition between seedling and old trees showing the
continuity of EMF communities and fungal interconnections between different trees.
26
multi-slage fung;
Danicl50n, 1984
l\1ason cl al., 1982
ャ・。イ セG⦅ウ ァ・
fungi
laIe-stage fung; 1
foresl in pioncer phase
< 10 an,
eanopy closure
20 an,
l\lderal sites c.g.:
• unslable Nw;romn<'111
• nmural disasler Ii"e e,g. fire
• human act;vilics
Pugh, 1980
«1{» fungi:
• .mall, eordless basid;oca'lls
• reproouc1ion o\"er spores
• shon li\";n'
climax vegelalion
> JO ans
climax vegelalion
"C"and«S"f""l:i:
• big. pcrsislcnllllld eordcd
basidiOClt'llS
• mycclium network
Fig. 7: Different concepts of the succession of mycorrhizal fungi during forest
development/ ruderal sites and climax vegetation. R, ruderal; C, competitive; S, stress-tolerant
(after Frankland, 1998).
Herbivory
Herbivores have an indirect influence on fungal community structure, as most plants reduce
root growth when being attacked by herbivores. The carbon limitation caused by defoliation
is the most likely reason for this mechanism: severe defoliation caused by the western spruce
budworm reduced EMF occurrence more severly than moderate defoliation (Kolb et al.,
1999). In general, a negative effect from indirect herbivore interaction on EMF communities
has been reported (Gehring & Whitham, 2002).
27
Saprotrophic fungi
Others than EMF, a huge number of saprotrophic fungi can be found in the soil, where a
competition for the principle sources of nutrients occurs. Although it could be shown in a
microcosm study that the saprotrophic fungus Phaenerochaete velutina reduced the growth
rate and density of the mycelium of Suillus bovinus (Leake et al., 2002), it is not clear what
general influence the presence of saprotrophic fungi have on the overall EMF community
structure.
“Biotic factors influencing ectomycorrhizal communities”
Factor
host plant
Effect on ectomycorrhizal community
• host-specific associations or broad host range
• taxonomically close plant species harbor more
similar EMF communities than with other host
plants
• EMF community can be very distant between
congeneric host plants, when physiology of the host
plants differ a lot
• host preferences at any given taxonomical level
may provide new niches
host age/ succession of forest
• different concepts developed
• early-stage, late-stage and multi-stage fungi
dependend on canopy closure
• ecological concept: “ruderal” fungi versus
“competitive and stress-tolerant” fungi showing
different reproduction strategies
herbivory
• depending on organism
• above-ground herbivory often indirect negative
effect over host plant
saprotrophic fungi
• competition for nutrients
• unknown influence on community structure
28
2.3.3.1.
Abiotic factors influencing ectomycorrhizal communities
Seasonal influence
Community structure of ECM is dependent on the seasons and fungi can be grouped by their
response to temporal patterns (Koide et al., 2007). Courty et al. (2008) described species,
which were present only during a few months, while others were detected during the whole
year, though abundance of certain species changed. They assumed that distribution and
presence of a species depends on its ecological preference. Buée et al. (2005) showed
contrasting seasonal patterns in metabolic activity of different ECM species. For example,
ECM formed by Clavulina cristata, Laccaria amethystina and Russula sp.were significantly
more abundant and active in winter than in summer.
Edaphic factors
Several studies have tried to determine the influence of edaphic factors upon EMF diversity.
The vertical distribution of fungi has attracted special attention as fungal diversity may be
explained from the niche partitioning due to the physiochemical features of each soil layer
(Erland & Taylor, 2002). Mycelium distribution has been shown partition in a Pinus resinosa
plantation (Dickie et al., 2002). Species were divided into specialists to certain soil horizons
or multilayer generalists, which shows that there is a wide range of substrate utilization
patterns among different ECM species. The species richness was significantly lower in the
deepest mineral layer than in the other layers (Dickie et al., 2002). Rosling and coworkers
(2003) documented the vertical distribution of ECM taxa over seven soil horizons in a podzol
profile. They reported that two thirds of the root tips colonized were in the mineral soil,
representing half of all ECM taxa found, as opposed to colonies in the highest fine root
density in the organic horizons. The major separation of species composition was found
between the organic and deeper mineral soil horizons. Taxa occuring in several horizons
showed normally a continuous distribution over nearby soil layers.
29
When looking at the spatial distribution of saprotrophic and mycorrhizal fungi, mycorrhizal
species predominate in the deeper soil profile while saprothropic fungi are mainly found in
the litter layer (O’Brien et al., 2005). Lindahl and coworkers (2007) compared this
distribution pattern to patterns of bulk carbon:nitrogen ratios and
C:N ratios and an enrichment of
15
15
N contents in soil. High
N in deeper soil layers showed a selective removal of N
(which means that plant N is mobilized by root-associated mycorrhizal fungi) and rootderived C (Figure 8). Spatial distribution within a mycorrhizal community was also drawn by
exploration type of mycelium (Agerer, 2001) and ecological function of the fungal species
(Genney et al., 2006).
C.N 'lIl",
o
,
Nee<!"" al abscission
'oN
.. .....
natu," セ
'" '" ., '''' "....... ..,.'- ,"
'" '" '" '" 1<,,'"
Liller 1
"<.
Litllo, 2
Fnogmo>nlfld イャッQセ
" ,-,
.""
•
Hu""," 2
-<
Mi,,",.lsoil
Xセッ
o 'urty' f""lli (""l known .aprolropticlungi)
III '181'" fungl (Il."l knawn myeormlzal fUOlli)
Fig. 8: Fungal community composition, carbon:nitrogen (C:N) ratio and 15N natural
abundance throughout the upper soil profile in a Scandinavian Pinus sylvestris forest.
Different letters in the diagrams indicate statistically significant differences between horizons in C:N ratios and
N abundance, and the standard error of the mean was < 0.3‰ for 15N natural abundance and < 3 for C:N ratio
(n = 19–27, for recently abscised needles n = 3). The age of the organic matter is estimated from the average
Δ14C of three samples from each horizon (five samples of the litter 2 (needles) fraction) and needle abscission
age (3 yr) is subtracted. Community composition data are expressed as the frequency of total observations.
‘Early’ fungi are defined as those occurring with a higher frequency in litter samples compared with older
organic matter and mineral soil. ‘Late’ fungi are those occurring with a higher frequency in older organic matter
(Lindahl et al., 2007).
15
30
There are several other soil features or environmental conditions influencing soil structure
leading to a different inventory of the mycorrhizal community composition. Most of these
factors are due to anthropogenic activities. Decreasing soil moisture lowers ECM community,
while the overall proportion of Cenococcum geophilum increases (Erland & Taylor, 2002).
Soil pH is also an important parameter. Fungal species show different sensitivity to pH and
respond with altered growth and colonization (Erland & Taylor, 2002). Some species have
altered enzymatic capabilities as some enzymes have a narrow pH optima. The overall
response of ECM community seems less affected by acidification than by liming as acid soils
are more common in the native boreal forests of ECM’s. Jonsson et al. (1999c) described
changes of community structure caused by liming and discussed the difference of competitive
balance between mycorrhizal and saprotrophic fungi. Rineau (2008) studied the mid-term
effects of liming on the ECM community and showed that especially ubiquistic or
competitive species replaced acidophilic and stress-tolerant species in the limed plots. The
liming effect was found to have less effect in some plots after fewer than 20 years, which is
why he considered liming as a short term, heterogenous effect.
Heavy metals also affect EMF. Fungi protect themselves against heavy metals by binding
them into cell-wall components or storing them in their cytosol. The sensitivity of ECM
communities to heavy metal stress is controversial. Hartley et al. (1997) found a negative
effect on fungal diversity with an increase in dominant species. In contrast to the results of
Hartley et al., species richness of 54 fungal taxa was reported on European aspen on a heavy
metal polluted site in Austria (Krpata et al., 2008). In this stuy, species abundance followed
community structure of undisturbed sites with a few abundant and a large number of rare
ECM species. Only Cenococcum geophilum showed adaption to heavy metal in its
distribution, as it was spread over several soil layers and normally appears preferentially in
the organic layer (Krpata et al., 2008).
N-deposition
ECM fungi are adapted to conditions of low mineral N availability and most of them are
capable to extract N from organic sources. Sites with high N deposition affect EMF
(Wallenda & Kottke, 1998) and species richness is reduced (Peter et al., 2001). Lilleskov and
coworker (2002) described the fungal community response to N polluted sites in more detail
by identifying ECM root tips. They showed that the stress-tolerant species which occure
31
naturally, like Cortinarius, Piloderma and Suillus, where the mineralisation process is low,
disappeared on N-rich sites and were replaced by generalistic species like Laccaria, Lactarius
and Paxillus. Concordant with these data, strong taxonomic signature in biomass production
was reported from 68 ECM species grown on nitrate as sole N source, although genes coding
for a nitrate reductase were detected (Nygren et al., 2008).
Fire
Wildfire is a major disturbance factor in forests and still occurs regurlarly in less fire
controlled ecosystems. Two kinds of wildfire have to be distinguished, as fire intensity seems
to play an important role: low intensity fires and intense stand replacing fires. Jonsson and
coworkers (1999b) documented EMF communities in a burned versus unburned latesuccesional stand in northern Sweden where fires have generally a low intensity. Most fungal
species were shared between both sites. The evennes of species distribution was lower on the
burned stand while species richness was not affected. In contrast, marked changes of
mycorrhizal community structure were reported after intense stand replacing fires (e.g.
Grogan et al., 2000), as host plants were killed and the soil environment was altered. Horton
et al. (1998) also reported a radical change of EMF community structure after intense fire, but
the dominant species of the pre-burned community were also present in the post-burned
community, although quantitatively reduced. Taylor & Bruns (1999) focused on the postburned dominant species. They demonstrated that these fungi were present only as a small
proportion of the mycorrhiza or only as propaguels before the fire, and when the fire removed
other competitive fungi they became dominant. The idea of this “inoculum reservoir” is based
on the position of these fungi within the soil before the fire. Propaguels can be either spores
or mycelia fragments. The authors further reinforced through a seedling bioassay.
32
Climate change
Some research work focused on climate change and its influence on EMF. One of the factors
caused by climate change is elevated CO2. Increased atmospheric CO2 enhances growth and
productivity of several plant species including their root systems, which leads to increased
ECM fungal colonisation (Rygiewicz et al., 1997). Additionally, shift in EMF community
structure was reported, where no ECM species of the community was dominant, but
abundance of all species was increased (Godbold et al., 1997). Gange et al. (2007) looked on
recent changes in fungal fruiting patterns caused by climate change. They observed a delay in
fruiting dates by 59% of the analyzed mycorrhizal species associated with broadleaf trees. No
delay was reported for species associated to conifers. Whether this influences community
structure is not yet clear.
“Abiotic factors influencing ectomycorrhizal communities”
Factor
Effect on ectomycorrhizal community
season
• contrasting seasonal patterns and enzymatic activities
vertical soil distribution
• specialists for each horizon and multilayer generalists
soil moisture
• decreasing soil moisture lowers ECM community
richness
soil pH
• fungal species show different sensitivity to pH
liming
• ubiquistic
species
or
competitive
species
replace
acidophilic and stress-tolerant species
N-deposition
• N-rich sites harbour generalistic ECM species
heavy metal
• influence on ECM community controversely discussed
wildfire
• dependent on fire intensity: low intensity = species
distribution is lowered; high intensity = fungi with
“inoculum reservoir” become dominant
elevated CO2
• no dominance of one species
33
2.4.Techniques for identifying mycorrhizal fungal species
2.4.1. Morphotyping
The classical technique to determine fungal species is morphotyping. In this technique species
are described according to their shape, colour and appearance of different fungal tissues or
layers (Figure 9).
Arbusular mycorrhizal fungi
The taxonomy on morphology of the AMF is mainly based on the spores. Families and genera
are mostly distinguished by hyphal attachement, while species are identified by their spore
wall structure and substructures (Morton, 1988; Walker, 1992). Additionally, shape of
arbuscules, vesicles and intraradical hyphae can be considered for determination. Until now
there have been eight different arbuscular types described depending on host plant and fungus
(Dickson, 2004). Walker (1992) noted the high percentage of misidentificaton and confusion
over clear classification. The taxonomic concept of the AMF were developed over years and
only some of the already described species were redescribed with the modern concept.
Ectomycorrhizal fungi
Below-ground studies on EMF communities are based on the presence of symbiotic ECM
root tips, while above-ground studies are based on carpophore determination (Horton &
Bruns, 2001). ECM can be easily collected, counted, weighed and analysed and analysis can
be coupled with other techniques. Macroscopic determination relies on several features, such
as the colour of the mantle, surface appearance, spatial organization, presence/absence of
cystidia and sclerotia. For some species, rhizomorphs are attached to the ECM and are a
helpful feature for species determination (Agerer, 1987-1998). If necessary the structure of
the mantle and the Hartig net can be analysed microscopically.
34
ECM:
1 rhizomorph
1
AMF:
hyphal attachement
BLMiNセO]Z[o|Gャ
F
spore wall
\
セMN
"
セN
1
vcsiclc
arbuscule
Fig. 9: Different fungal features used for morphotyping. (A) Lactarius dulcis ECM; (B)
Scleroderma citrinum ECM with rhizomorphs (Reich); (C) emanating hyphae of Cenococcum geophilum ECMs;
(D) Lactarius subdulcis ECM mantle transversal section (A,C,D; Rineau); (E) Pisolithus tinctorius ECM
transverse section, external (EM) and internal mantles (IM), root cortex (RC), Hartig net (HN), extraradical
hyphae (EH) (Martin et al., 2001); (F) spores of Glomus geosporum, G. mossae, G. intraradices; bare size = 100
µm; (G) vesicles of Glomus tenue; (H) arbuscules of Glomus tenue (F,G,H Walker).
35
Pros and Cons
Morphotyping is a skill, which needs specialized training; furthermore it is a time-consuming
technique and cannot be applied on large-scale studies. This is especially true in ecological
studies where many morphotypes can stay unidentified.
Despite these deficits, morphotyping provides useful data: it is very important to describe new
species and can also give insights into the functional role of fungi (Agerer, 2001).
Genetically, the sequences of morphotypes could help to build a robust database with highquality sequences and descrease the number of unidentified species in public databases.
“Morphotyping”
• morphotyping is the classical technique to determine fungal species
• for the determination of EMF the ectomycorrhizal root tips are used
• AMF are mainly determined by their spores; sometimes also the shape of arbuscules
and vesicles contain some taxonomical informations
• very often morphotyping is not descriminating enough on species level;
misidentification occurs
• morphotyping is especially important, when new species are described or voucherspecimens for sequence deposit are needed
1 Environmental sample
1
セ
1
DNA extraction 1
セ
1 PCR amplification 1
.... .
セ
tRISA
SSCP
DGGE
•
Molecular cloning
Eleclorphoresis techniques
RFLP
T-RFLP
-t
Ztg セ
clone Iibrary
セ
セ
electrophoretic seperation by:
1
·c ::
....
")
454 sequencing
beads are layered
on a Pico TiterPlate
individual clone
セ
セ
sequence reagents
are f10wn across
the Pico TilerPlate
、セZ・イ ョN
GC
q
__ . content
composition
セ
PCR on insert
Array technique
labeling of
PCR products
セ
セ
セ
Iigase
reaction
hybridization
セ
scanning of array
Sanger Sequencing
developing reference database byanalysing
electropherogram of known species
comparison of community profile to reference
database
BLASTN against public databases
alignment
phylogenetic trees
normalization
background signal
signal intensity
modifIe<! version ofMitcholi & Zoccaro. 2006
Fig. 10: PCR- based approaches to environmental nucleic acid analysis. DNA is extracted from the environmental source and is subjected to PCR
amplification to produce a heterogeneous mixture of sequences. These are seperated into individual molecules by electrophoresis techniques (ARISA, amplified ribosomal
intergenic spacer analysis; (T-) RFLP, (terminal-) restriction fragment length polymorphism; SSCP, single stranded conformational polymorhpism; DGGE, denaturant
gradient gel electrophoresis; TGGE, temperature gradient gel electrophoresis), by cloning, by cleavage to beads or by hybridization. Results of the used techniques are viewed
as banding patterns, sequences or signals on the array. Dotted file indicates the possibility after certain electrophoretic fingerprinting techniques to isolate single bands and to
subject extracted PCR products to a cloning/Sanger sequencing step. *Single DNA fragments are bound to beads before running the PCR.
36
band size
secondary
structure
-;
37
2.4.2. Molecular techniques to study fungal diversity
A variety of molecular techniques has been applied to assess the diversity of microorganism
in environmental samples and has revolutionized our understanding of the dynamics of
microbes in ecosystems. Most of these techniques have been adapted for ecological studies on
fungal communities and will help us to understand fungal community diversity and
functioning (Horton & Bruns, 2001). These molecular techniques have some advantages over
the tradional morphotyping as they allow for high throughput studies. Beside this, molecular
techniques also make it possible to track the diversity of communities in more depth,
especially in detecting cryptic species or species, which are difficult to describe by
morphotyping. Additionally, fungal mycelium abundance and distribution in soil can be
analyzed.
Although there is a large set of molecular techniques, they all rely on polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) (if immunological methods are excluded) (Figure 10). They rely on the
enzymatic replication of a target sequence in vitro by using primers (a short strand of nucleic
acid complement to the target sequence), which bind at the beginning and end of the choosen
sequence to start the amplification reaction.
Markergenes
For the use of PCR in species identification, potential marker genes have to be carefully
choosen. A marker gene has to show a high phylogenetic inference power to distinguish
clearly between fungal families – genus – species, or even isolates, depending on the
ecological question. Furthermore, marker genes must contain conserved sites for primer
annealing and variable sequences inbetween primer sites. Most often high copy number genes
are choosen as amplification is easiest (Mitchell & Zuccaro, 2006).
The most used gene regions for studying fungal ecology are the genes of the ribosomal RNA
gene cluster (Anderson et al., 2003). They exist in several copies in the genome organized in
tandem repeats. These genes consist of variable and conserved regions (Figure 11).
The 18S gene (part of the small subunit (SSU) is the most conserved one of the rRNA genes.
For most of the ECM species, the phylogenetical resolution goes very little beyond the family
level due to their affiliation to the Basidiomycota and Ascomycota. However, some ECM
groups (e.g. some Pezizales and Cantharellaceae) were determined on their 18S gene
38
sequence (Horton & Bruns, 2001). SSU sequences of the ancient fungal clade of the
Glomeromycota show more variation than in the Dikaryota. Hence, this region is widely used
to discriminate between AMF species or even below species level (Vandenkoornhuyse et al.,
2003). Schüßler et al. (2001) used also the SSU to separate the Glomeromycota from the
Zygomycota.
Nuclear ribosomal RNA gene duster
------lAe--
r-
(
,
-
IGS
NTS
55 rRNA
LSU
- - ---
-----.
\
•
NTS
185 rRNA
SSU
ITS1
rrS2
5.85 rRNA
LSU
285,RNA
LSU
NTS
f--
------------------------------------
Fig. 11: The ribosomal RNA gene cluster. The cluster comprises four genes (5S, 5.8S, 28S, 18S),
intergenic spacer (IGS with non transcribed spacer (NTS)) and internal transcribed spacer (ITS). Regions, which
are transcribed, are indicated by dashed arrows. The degree of sequence conservation varies between these
genetic regions and within the genes. Additionally, accumulation of mutations in these regions differ between
EMF and AMF due to their different evolutional ages. Red marked regions are mostly used for AMF
identification on species level, while green regions are mostly used for EMF.
The large subunit (LSU) genes are more variable, especially in the domains D2 and D8 in the
28S, which contain a lot of phylogenetic information. These variable regions occur in similar
positions relative to the secondary structure within different organisms (Hopple & Vilgalys,
1999). The LSU is widely used in studies of AMF communities. In contrast, only few studies
on EMF were carried out on the LSU genes due to the relative low number of sequences in
public databases (Horton & Bruns, 2001; Moncalvo, 2000; Tedersoo et al., 2009).
39
The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions are two spacer regions (ITS1 & ITS2), seperated
by the 5.8S gene, and show a high sequence and size variation. Their size together can vary
between 650 – 900 bp (including the 5.8S). The ITS regions are the most frequently used
rRNA region to analyse phylogeny of EMF (Gardes & Bruns, 1991; Henrion et al., 1992).
Their resolution goes to species or beyond species level. The sequence variability is drawn by
indels and repetitions, what can make alignment of ITS-sequences difficult. Recently evolved
species have often a lack of species variability in the ITS. For community analysis of the
Glomeromycota, the ITS is rarely chosen as a marker gene, because intraspecific sequence
variability is very high.
In some studies, researchers used two rRNA genes to describe fungal communities (O’Brien,
2005). James et al. (2006) reconstructed the phylogeny of fungi with six different genes,
using three of the rRNA genes, elongation factor 1-α and two RNA polymerase II subunits.
Furthermore, genome scans and novel molecular insights have brought attention to other
single-copy genes (Aguileta et al., 2008). These strategies, however, are not transferable to
large-scale fungal community detection approaches as there is a lack of sequence information
in the public databases.
“Molecular techniques to study mycorrhizal fungi”
• molecular biological techniques allow high throughput studies
• they allow very often the detection of cryptic and unculturable species or species,
which cannot be determined by morphotyping
• marker genes show high phylogenetic inference power
• rRNA genes, high copy genes, are widely used to determine fungi
• rRNA genes suit differently well to trace different fungal subgroups
• in some approaches, several genes or single-copy genes were used to trace fungi
40
Box 2: Primers & PCR
Some primers are generic, while others are specific to certain taxonomic groups. The
specificity depends on the annealing site. During amplification some problems can occur, but
by adjusting the PCR conditions most of them can be overcome:
Problem: Co-amplification of non-target organisms can lead to an inaccurate estimation of
fungal diversity (Pang & Mitchell, 2005). Solution: The specificity of primers largely depends
on the availability of enough suitable sequences to design and to compare the designed primer
to other non-target groups. Designed primers have to be aligned against more species.
Problem: Preferential annealing of primers to certain templates more than to others
influences molecular diversity assessments (Wubet et al., 2003). Solution: It is necessary to
use multiple primer sets. Using several group-specific primers enables better resolution and
identification of species (Tedersoo et al., 2006).
Problem: Low target concentration in the sample or inhibitors (e.g. polyphenols) present in
many root samples hinder amplification (Redecker, 2002). Solution: A nested PCR can be
applied (van Tuinen, 1998), which is a two-step PCR: a first PCR is run with a set of primers
of broad host-template annealing range followed by a second PCR with more groupe-specific
primers.
The most common primers for fungal ITS amplification are ITS1F (Gardes & Bruns, 1993)
and ITS4 (White et al., 1990). ITS1F was designed with the intent to identify EMF, but it can
also be used for wide-scale fungal community analysis (Lindahl, 2007; O’Brien, 2005). To
reduce co-amplification bias, more specific primers have been designed such as ITS4B for the
Basidiomycota (Gardes & Bruns, 1993) and ITS4A for the Ascomycota (Larena et al., 1999) or
NSI1 and NLB4 for Dikaryomycota (Martin & Rygiewicz, 2005).
ITS1F and ITS4 have also been used for identification of AMF communities, but they were
coupled separately with five different Glomales-specific primers (Redecker, 2000).
Primers amplifying fungal rRNA regions are listed on:
• http://www.biology.duke.edu/fungi/mycolab/primers.htm
• http://aftol.biology.duke.edu/pub/primers/viewPrimers
• http://plantbio.berkeley.edu/~bruns/
41
2.4.2.1.
DNA Fingerprinting techniques
Overview
In some molecular biological approaches PCR products are seperated into individual
fragements by electrophoresis. The resulting fragment profiles, so-called DNA fingerprints,
are used as information about the community diversity. These techniques can be classed into
two subgroups. In the first one, the amplified fragments are separated by their different
properties on a gel causing a different electrophoresis mobility of the molecules (denaturing-/
temperature- gradient gel electrophoresis (D-/T-GGE) and single strand conformation
polymorphism (SSCP)). The second group comprises techniques where fragments are
separated only by the size of the fragment (amplified ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis
(ARISA) and restriction-/ terminal restriction- fragment length polymorphism (R-/ TR-FLP))
(Figure 11).
T-RFLP technique is the most popular fingerprinting technique and is widely used to describe
species richness (Vandenkoornhuyse et al., 2003) or to identify species in a community
(Genney et al., 2006; Lindahl et al., 2007). PCR products are digested using restriction
enzymes and only the terminal fragments are labelled. The fragment size of a band is
compared to a T-RFLP database. Large databases are already developed, but very often they
are build up on fungi with epigeous sporocarps or on morphotyped mycorrhiza. Thus,
“hidden” fungi remain as “unknown” as they are very often missing from these databases.
The most accurate determination can be achieved when the database is created from the same
sample site. T-RFLP technique is discussed in depth in the review of Dickie & FitzJohn
(2007).
Pros and Cons
All these techniques need relatively minimal technical equipment. Thus, quick sample
processing and a relative high throuput of samples are possible. Furthermore, they are less
expensive than sequencing (Dickie & FitzJohn, 2004) or array approaches. Most often these
techniques are used to describe community structures. The presence of a band in the
community profile is interpreted as presence of the corrsponding species. But the absence of a
band does not necessarily stand for the absence of a species, as resolution for less abundant
species is not high enough. Additionally, the separation of relatively small DNA fragments
can be problematic (Muyzer, 1999). Sometimes a single band can consist of several fragments
from different species (Mitchell & Zuccaro, 2006). Another problem are unknown species,
42
which cannot be even classified taxonomically as sequence information is missing. The band
pattern of these “unknown species” can also derive from PCR artefacts or from nontarget
species such as endophytes.
“Fingerprinting techniques”
• fingerprinting techniques separate PCR products into individual molecules by
electrophoresis
• T-RFLP most popular fingerprinting technique
• minimal technical equipment, relative cheep in comparison to other techniques
• community profiles have to be compared to previously developed databases
• resolution is not high enough for detailed view on community
2.4.2.2.
Sequencing techniques
Sanger-Sequencing
Another widely used technique for description of mycorrhizal fungi communities is
sequencing of PCR-amplified loci (Ahulu et al., 2006; Rosling et al., 2003; van Tuinen et al.,
1998). The amplified sequences are compared to those available in public databases allowing
an exact determination to species level or beyond. The first developed Sanger sequencing
technology (Sanger & Coulson, 1975) is often combined with a cloning step, where the PCR
products from a microbial community are separated by cloning individual molecules in a
bacterial vector and constructing a gene library. The vector itself can easily be amplified and
sequenced. Thus, sequencing can give a full record of what has been amplified if sequencing
effort is high enough. Beside community description, sequencing is often used
complementary to profiling fingerprinting techniques for subsequent species identification
after e.g. T-RFLP-analysis (Figure 10; Burke et al., 2005; Lindahl et al., 2007).
The advantage of this combined approach is not only the description of the unknown or
cryptic species at a taxonomic level or better, but also the identification of PCR artefacts like
chimeric sequences, which influence the estimation of species richness (Anderson, 2006).
Cloning/sequencing approach can become very costly and time-consuming with an increasing
43
number of samples and risks underestimation of species richness due to sample limitation.
Until now the more complete view of the fungal diversity in soils realized by Sanger
sequencing analyzed less than 1,000 sequences (O’Brien et al., 2005). The bottlenecks for
Sanger sequencing are library and template preparation and tedious sequencing procedures.
454 pyrosequencing
With the purpose to simplify this process, especially the in vitro sample preparation,
Margulies et al. (2005) developed a modified pyrosequencing technique by combining several
different technologies. This new 454 pyrosequencing technique comprises the complete
sequence process covering all subsequent steps from the gene of interest to the finished
sequence with a throughput of 10 megabases/hour (Rothberg & Leamon, 2008) (Figure 12).
Also, sample preparation is much quicker than for Sanger sequencing as the preparation steps
differ strikingly (Table 1). The 454 pyrosequencing technique developed very quickly and it
became possible to sequence more complex genomes or species communities with time
(Figure 13).
Table 1: Comparison of Sanger sequencing and 454 sequencing procedures for
description of fungal communities
Sanger sequencing 454 sequencing
time required
Isolation of DNA
x
x
~3h
Amplification of marker gene
x
x
~3h
Cloning
x
~3h
Clone picking
x
~2h
PCR on plasmids
x
~3h
Purification of PCR products
x
~2h
Running sequencer (capillary system)
x
~8h
454 sequencing library
x
~5h
Amplification in PCR microreactors
x
~6h
Sequencing run (flowing system)
x
~4h
Assembly of raw sequences
x
x
days to weeks
after Wicker et al., 2006
44
It has already been applied for many different research aspects such as genomics (e.g. Andries
et al. 2005), transcriptomics (Bainbridge et al., 2006), metagenomics (e.g. Edward et al.,
2006) and functional metagenomics (Dinsdale et al., 2008). In 2008, the 6 gigabase genome
of J. D. Watson was sequenced in only two month. Overall, the results agreed with older
results of Sanger sequencing of a human individual. Additionally, novel genes were
discovered as Sanger sequencing can loose sequence information during the cloning step
(Wheeler et al., 2008). More complex genomes, such as the barley genome (Wicker et al.,
2006), or the transcriptome of Medicago truncatula (Cheung et al., 2006) have also been
partly sequenced using 454 pyrosequencing. Even 13 Mio base pairs of mammoth
mitochondrial DNA were discovered in a metagenomic approach, revealing the high sequence
identity of 98.55% with African elephants (Poinar et al. 2006).
,
... ii
A
,
T
G
C
Fig. 12: Overview of the 454 sequencing technology. (a) Genomic DNA is isolated, fragmented,
ligated to adapters and separated into single strands. (b) Fragments are bound to beads under conditions that
favor one fragment per bead, the beads are isolated and compartmentalized in the droplets of a PCR-reactionmixture-in-oil emulsion and PCR amplification occurs within each droplet, resulting in beads each carrying ten
million copies of a unique DNA template. (c) The emulsion is broken, the DNA strands are denatured and beads
carrying single-stranded DNA templates are enriched (not shown) and deposited into wells of a fiber-optic slide.
(d) Smaller beads carrying immobilised enzymes required for a solid phase pyrophosphate sequencing reaction
are deposited into each well. (e) Scanning electron micrograph of a portion of a fiber-optic slide, showing fiberoptic cladding and wells before bead deposition. (f) The 454 sequencing instrument consists of the following
major subsystems: a fluidic assembly (object i), a flow cell that includes the well-containing fiber-optic slide
(object ii), a CCD camera-based imaging assembly with its own fiber-optic bundle used to image the fiber-optic
slide (part of object iii), and a computer that provides the necessary user interface and instrument control (part of
object iii) (Rothberg & Leamon, 2008).
Mitochondrial DNA:
• Mammulhus primigenius (mammoth)
• metagenomic approach
• POinar el al., Science
Whole genome sequencing of bacleria:
• Mycobacterium tuberculosis (4 Mb)
• M. smegmalis (6 Mb)
• Andries el a/., Science
Human genome:
• Homo sapiens (6 gigabase)
• Wheeler et al., Nature
Transcriptome:
• of a human prostate cancer ceilline
• Bainbridge et a/.. BMC Genomics
45
Whole genome sequencing of a fungus:
• Neurospora crassa (40 Mb)
• lIMW454com''''''''''*'''<t454 CASE ST1.O'f !II!"O"'I! """0'I10!l0P'i'
Complex genome of eukaryote:
• Hordeum vu/gare (barley)
• Wicker el al.. BMC Genomics
Metagenomic:
• microbial communily in il Soudan mine
• Edwards el al, 8MC Genomics
Metagenomic on fungal communities
Fig. 13: Timeline of research projects using the novel 454 Sequencing technique, showing the use in a variety of different research purpose.
46
Metagenomic analysis using 454 pyrosequencing
Normally, metagenomic is the sampling of genome sequences of a community of organisms
inhabiting a common niche. To date, metagenomic analyses have been largely applied to
microbial communities. With the new sequencing techniques, metagenomic analysis will
complete the in-depth understanding of species richness on earth. Initial 454 pyrosequencing
studies on microbial population structures in a deep marine biosphere described more than
over 10,000 bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTU) (threshold of 3% sequence identity)
and the slope of the calculated rarefaction curve was still far from approaching the asymptote
(Huber et al., 2007). A comparison of four different sites in the ocean demonstrated striking
differences of microbial communities. A relatively small number of different species always
dominated the samples beside thousands of low-abundant species (Sogin et al., 2006).
Distinctness of microbial communities was also reported from two adjacent sites in a Soudan
mine in Minnesota, USA where the divergent biochemistry of the available substrate
separated the two communities. It was determined that species richness was much higher for
the “oxidised” samples than for the “reduced” samples (Edwards et al., 2006). 454
pyrosequencing was also used in functional metagenomics, which determines metabolic
processes that are important for growth and survival of communitites in a given environment.
Dinsdale and coworkers (2008) analyzed nine biomes from distinct sites. Strongly
discriminating metabolic profiles across the environments were reported and the authors
stated that different ecosystems cannot be distinguished by taxa but by their metabolic
profiles. So far, no metagenomic or functional metagenomic studies have been published on
fungal communities using 454 pyrosequencing.
Pitfalls of 454 pyrosequencing
The estimation of the number of sequences needed for in-depth description of communities
remains crucial, as the number of needed sequences can vary with the chosen marker gene
region. For example, Anderson et al. (2003) reported that more ITS sequences are needed
than 18S sequences to achieve coverage of fungal diversity. Hence, programmes calculating
rarefaction curves and running statistical tests on sequence number should be used (Weidler et
al., 2007). A problem linked to estimating the number of needed sequences is the
determination of the cut-off value for taxonomic grouping, as sequence homology is
influenced by inter- and intraspecific variation. Acosta-Martínez et al. (2008) proposed to
calculate rarefaction curves with different cut-off levels starting with 0% sequence homology
47
up to 20%. 3% sequence homology seemes to be the most accurate estimation on species
level and 5% on a genus level. The same authors described more than 2,000 OTUs in their
study, with a 3% cut-off, but the rarefaction curve still did not reach the asymptote. Thus, also
with 454 pyrosequencing an enormous sequencing effort has to be made and detailed
characterization of community and diversity remains a challenge.
Although 454 pyrosequencing technique shows high-throughput potential, care should be
taken in analysis and interpretation of the results. As large data sets are produced, analysis of
sequences has to be automated. But automated BLAST can lead to misinterpretation, as the
first hit of the BLAST may not be the best one. Analysis of 454 pyrosequencing data also
needs higher amounts of storage capacity and CPU power than Sanger sequencing. Even
more problematic for CPU power is the overall sequence comparison required in
metagenomic analysis. Additionally, the outcome of metagenomic analysis is based on what
we can infer from databases, and uncharacterized species or genes will hinder the in-depth
understanding (Hugenholtz & Tyson, 2008).
The outcome of the sequences produced by 454 pyrosequencing of 100 to max. 300 bp bears
a different error profile than the one produced by traditional Sanger sequencing and it can
negatively influence accurate assembling of metagenomes in the absence of scaffolds
(Edwards et al., 2008). The assembling of highly repetitive sequence regions, such as found
in the barley genome, also fails without a reference scaffold (Wicker et al., 2006). In this
case, it can be helpful to combine Sanger with 454 pyrosequencing technique. New data
handling strategies have been developed to address these specific problems of 454
pyrosequencing (Trombetti et al., 2007).
Despite these technical problems, the ability of
high-throughput techniques to determine subtle differences in community change or
metabolic potential of communities will allow 1) to describe communities in-depth and 2) to
detect environmental changes at early stages of perturbation.
48
“Sequencing techniques”
• 454 pyrosequencing has a higher throughput capacity and simplified sample preparation
than Sanger sequencing
• 454 pyrosequencing enables massively parallel sequencing reaction and produces
thousands of sequences in one run
• 454 pyrosequencing has been applied in genomics, transcriptomics and metagenomics
• metagenomic approach has been yet only applied on microbial communities and
revealed new insights into their dynamics and structures
• new analysis programmes and higher CPU capacity is needed to overcome to the
specific bias of 454 pyrosequencing
49
Box 3: Public sequence databases
The largest database is GenBank at the NCBI containing currently 4,228,658 fungal sequences
of 24,364 fungal species (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/txstat.cgi; as of December
2008). Uneven representation of taxonomic groups and genomic regions is observed (Figure
14). This deposit deficiency makes identification of environmental sequences of some fungal
groups more difficult than for others. Furthermore, accuracy of many sequences in databases is
questionable and hinders identification. Bridge et al. (2003) showed that up to 20% of the
sequences of Genbank are incorrectly named or of poor quality for reliable comparison.
Ideally, public-access databases should provide a working archive of available sequences,
forming a valuable resource, analogous to herbarium and culture collections. In an initiative
to provide high-quality ITS sequences of ECM fungi, the open-access database UNITE was
founded by Kõljalg et al. (2005). The deposited sequences derive always from herbarium
specimens and are linked to informations of the date, collector/source and ecological data.
Only fungal specialist, accepted by UNITE, are allowed to add sequences. Another problem of
the Genbank database is the large number (27%) of unidentified sequences (Nilsson et al.
2006). To monitor the taxonomic progress of the own deposited unidentified sequences over
time, Nilsson et al. (2005) wrote the programme emerencia, which compares regularly the
datasets of unidentified sequences with the identified from GenBank. Discussion of the
accuracy of GenBank entries has become an important issue. Bidartondo wrote with 255
other researchers (2008) an open letter to NCBI asking for a cumulative annotation process of
GenBank sequences, where third parties improve annotation. Until now, NCBI has rejected
annotation. Only when changes can be backed by a publication third party annotation is
allowed. It is likely, given the lack of good annotations at GenBank, that new more accurate
databases
will
be
built
by
(http://www.bio.utk.edu/fesin/title.htm).
networks
such
as
UNITE
or
FESIN
50
Al
• AsComveota
Basidiornvtota
_
MSTセャQ
• Glomeromycota
.other
195214
Bl
...--
1,80
_ilS
OlSU
.SSU
.other
l)ala from Deccmbcr 2008
Fig. 14: Fungal sequences in GenBank. (A) Number of nucleotide sequences of Ascomycota,
Basidiomycota and Glomeromycota and sequences from other fungi or undefined fungi. (B) Percentage of fungal
rRNA nucleotide sequences.
51
2.4.2.3.
Array technique
Microarrays consist of a solid surface, mostly a glass slide, onto which detection probes are
chemically bonded. They allow a rapid parallel detection of several labelled and hybridized
molecules of interest from a sample simultaneously (Figure 15). Arrays are versatile and
flexible in their design and can be adjusted to different research features such as DNA, RNA
or proteins. The first arrays are dot blot analysis and spotted nylon arrays (Saiki et al., 1989).
The first microarrays were developed with the purpose of monitoring gene expression in
Arabidopsis thaliana (Schena et al., 1995). The array technique has been further developed
for complete genome analysis (complete genome array (CGA) or tilling array (Yamada et al.,
2003)), for tracking selected genes of key enzymes for certain metabolic pathways (functional
gene array (FGA) (He et al., 2007)) or for tracing and describing communities (phylochips,
reviewed by Sessitsch et al., 2006).
Fig. 15: Annealing of labelled amplicon with a specific oligonucleotide that is lined to a
solid surface via an amino linker (Summberbell et al., 2005).
Array approach used to study bacterial communities
Both, FGAs and phylochips are largely applied for bacterial community studies and can be
used for large-scale detection. Brodie et al. (2006) developed a phylochip carrying 500,000
bacterial 16S probes to determine, if changes in microbial community composition were a
factor in uranium reoxidation. Their analysis identified five clusters of bacterial subfamilies
responding in different manner to the three studied reaction phases (Figure 16). They could
even describe the reaction of individual members of different subfamilies in detail (e.g. the
metal-reducing bacteria Geobacteraceae).
With a similar question in mind, He and coworkers (2007) developed the first array for
studying biogeochemical processes and functional activities, the GeoChip, a type of FGA.
The developed FGA carried 24,243 oligonucleotides representing more than > 10,000 genes
52
in greater than 150 functional groups such as nitrogen, carbon and sulfur cycling. The
researchers monitored microbial community dynamics in groundwater undergoing an in situ
biostimulation for uranium reduction and showed that the uranium concentration in
groundwater was significantly correlated with the total abundance of c-type cytochrome
genes. They showed that species can also be detected over functional genes using microarray
approach (He et al., 2007).
Another application of microarrays is in clinical diagnosis. Helpful here, as for the GeoChip,
is the combination of probes used to identify individual bacterial species and probes used to
identify virulence and antibiotic resistance genes on one array. Such a diagnostic tool has the
potential to trace pathogens, but also to function as an early warning system for pathogenic
bacteria that have been recently modified in their virulence or antibiotic resistance (Stabler et
al., 2008).
Fig. 16: Example of
array analysis: heatmap
-..-.,_u _
-.
_
...,
........
_._-,--
_._f-M セ ⦅ N
1:
'1
,H
-_.
_._-
J, I-,N
ri
'
,
1:M[セ]cMG _._-!
, 1
and dendogram showing the
response of 100 bacterial
subfamilies
under
nine
different conditions (Are2.2,
2.1, 2.3, Red2, 1, 3, Ox1, 2,
3). The colour gradient from
green to red represents
increasing
array
hybridization intensity. Five
main response groups were
detected, and the average
intensity (HybScore) of the
cluster group response is
presented in line plots to the
right of the heatmap (after
Brodie et al., 2006).
Table 2: Some operation steps, their problems and possible solutions in the development and application of DNA microarrays
Design step
In silico probe design
Problems
Identification of target group
Solutions/Improvements
•
Creation of an aligned sequence database
Assessing probe hybridization
behavior
•
Check probe specificity against up-to date sequence
databases
•
Evaluate theoretical hybridization behavior by
calculating thermodynamic properties for probe-target
duplex and inter- and intra-molecular interactions of
probe and target molecules
Some probes show false-negative or
false-positive signals
•
Evaluate microarray by individual hybridization with
reference nucleic acids; remove false-negative and
highly cross-hybridizing probes
Uniform hybridization behavior
Different probes display different
target-binding capacities
•
Use probes with similar predicted Tm and GC
•
Uniform oligonucleotide probe length plus addition of
tertiary amine salts to hybridization/ wash buffer
•
Determine range of sensitivity achievable with the
microarray: hybridize concentration series of target
organisms perfectly matching the probes with the lowest
and highest duplex yield on the microarray
Sensitivity thresholds differ among
probes due to their different target
binding capacities
after Wagner et al., 2007
53
Specificity
54
Application of array technique in fungal research
Monitoring of fungal pathogens is also a keystone of pest management of plant diseases.
Different phylochips were developed for the identification of Fusarium and Verticillium
pathogens (Lievens et al., 2003, 2005; Tambong et al., 2006). The phylochip analysis showed
the same results as plating analysis, but results were generally received within 24h. Therefore,
the authors concluded that phylochip technique is rapid and efficient in the detection of
pathogens because simultaneously identification of multiple species is possible (Lievens et
al., 2003).
Hultman and her coworkers (2008) focused on the fungal fraction in compost communities.
Therefore, they constructed a microarray with fungi-specific oligonucleotides by aligning
11,881 fungal ITS sequences. They validated their phylochip by describing fungal species out
of ten compost samples and confirmed the results with cloning/sequencing approach. As the
phylochip showed a detection limit of 0.04% of the total DNA, it has the potential also to
detect fungi on pathogenic levels.
ECM species were detected on a first-try small-scale phylochip developed by Bruns & Gardes
in 1993. Five oligonucleotides designed for certain suilloid genera were used, but none of the
probes exhibited their intended specificity. Using the probes collectively they worked well for
identification of suilloid taxa of field collected mycorrhizae. El Karkouri et al. (2007) showed
in dot blot analysis that identification of some Tuber species on their ITS motifs is possible.
They traced T. magnatum and T. melanosporum in a blind test with 27 different fungal
isolates showing that tracing of truffle species via DNA barcoding is possible.
Array design/Array types
When a phylochip is designed, several steps have to be taken into account (Table 2). The first
step in phylochip development is the selection of appropriate phylogenetic marker genes
because good microcoding is highly dependent on the target region (see section Marker
genes) and used sequences from databases (Wagner et al., 2007). The specificity of the
designed probes must also be tested by BLAST against public databases and against all
designed probes. Furthermore, all probes must have nearly the same length, the same GCcontent and should not form dimers or hairpins, which influence hybridization and signal
intensity. One of the biggest problems of array technique is the detection of false positives
(cross-hybridizations). Normally, the false positive signal drops out with decreasing sequence
identity of probe and non-target template (Shiu & Borevitz, 2008), however, crosshybridization is still widely reported (Sessitsch et al., 2006). Therefore, it is important to
55
validate the designed probes in silico and then in situ and all bad probes should be deleted
from array analysis. Additionally, hybridization and washing conditions should be optimized.
There are different kinds of array approaches developed to decrease the number of false
interpretation. One of these approaches uses multiple probe detection, where only presence of
a certain species is assumed when a certain number of the specific probes give a positive
signal. Furthermore, the threshold of signal intensity, from which on a signal is considered as
true positive, is carefully chosen. In another array approach a mismatch probe (MP), with an
alteration at the 13th base position, is designed beside the real 25mer detection probe (DP) as
found on Affimetrix arrays. After hybridization, signals are only considered as true positives,
when 1) the intensity of the DP probe is “x” times greater than the intensity of the MP and 2)
the difference in intensity, DP minus MP, is at least “x” times greater than the calculated
value for the background (Brodie et al., 2006). In another array approach, selective probes,
ligation reactions and universal arrays are combined. Two probes are designed specific for
one target sequence. One of the probes carries a fluorescent label and the other one a unique
sequence, the so-called zipCode. In the presence of a proper template, both probes are ligated.
The ligation mix is hybridized on a universal array, which is unrelated to a specific molecular
analysis, but carries complementary oligonucleotides to the zipCodes. Hybridizing probes are
detected via the fluorescent label (Busti et al., 2002) (Figure 17). Using one of these
approaches, very often the overall percentage of false positives becomes negligible (He et al.,
2007; Hultman et al., 2008).
Fig. 17: Schematic representation of ligation detection reaction (LDR). (A) Each
organism of intrest is identified by a Common Probe and a Discriminating Oligo. The
common probe is phosphorylated on its 5’ end and contains a unique cZip Code affixed to its
3’ end. The discriminating oligo carries a fluorescent label (Cy3) on its 5’ end, and a
discriminating base at its 3’ terminal position. The two probes hybridize adjacently to each
other on the template DNA (PCR-amplified rDNA) and the nick between the two oligos is
sealed by the ligase only if there is perfect complementarity at the junction. The reaction can
be thermally cycled. (B) The presence of an organism is determined by hybridizing the
content of a LDR to an addressable DNA Universal Array, where unique Zip Code sequences
have been spotted (Busti et al., 2002).
see next page
56
Ugation Detection Reaction
Pfu DHA Ligne
DiscOminabng
oIigo
Comma, Probe
( c;D
,
.....
91l)V
clip code
EGGIIAwftÇd IpsMUAEGGôr •• ••••••
\
,es
• ••••••••
ampHcon
gc i ta tgc t a tcセ]」イZ a ]
_
,-
Perfect match
.. ,
clip code
A
,
.....N ⦅セZG
H/
•
proOOct
. . ,es
ampHmn
GCGIITAAATGCCG'l'TAATGCCTAA
Ld NセB・G エゥッᄋo c セB ⦅ ィLゥーG
__⦅ Njセ
U -::---_
Ugation MIX
..
DNA
-
'univerMI'chlp'
Zîp 1
\cセ
......
clip 3
CGCIIAT'M'ACOGCAATTAC'<:;(;ATT
L,gallOO pl'oâucI
セ
.
Zip 3
Lセ
B
|ーッセLI
-
57
Pros and Cons
One problem using phylochips for community studies is that they can only detect taxa known
to be present on the site. A nested approach by using probes specific on genus or family level
can help to describe the cryptic species, at least taxonomically. Additionally, description of
the community is not necessarily representing the active community. Nevertheless, array
processing is easy to handle and results are received very quickly (within 24 h). Phylochip
analysis can be used to investigate the biogeography of known species and to monitor
intensively community dynamics of specific sites. Furthermore, they can be helpful in tracing
specific species in clinical approaches.
“Array technique”
• four types of array exist: expression arrays, complete genome arrays, functional gene
arrays (FGA), phylochips
• FGAs and phylochips have been especially developed to monitor bacterial communities
and their dynamics and functions
• fungal phylochips were mostly developed to trace pathogenic fungi
• phylochips can be applied in pest management, clinical diagnosis and monitoring
species
• different array approaches were developed to overcome cross-hybridization problems of
probes
58
2.4.3. Closing words about detection techniques
I presented in the last sections different genotyping techniques. The technique used in a study
should be chosen according to the focus on the studied fungi, as the techniques differ in their
resolution and their specificity to detect various species. Following questions should be asked
before taking a decision which detection technique will be applied in the study and how to
interpret the data:
Questions for the design of the study
1. On which fungal group does my study focus?
2. How many species do I expect to find?
3. Do I want to make a detailed species inventory or do I want to get an overview on present
taxonomical groups?
4. How many samples will be treated?
5. Do I want to have an exhaustive view on species richness?
Questions concerning the possibilities of a laboratory
1. Which technical facilities do I have in the laboratory?
2. How much money should be spent on the project?
3. Which skills have I, which ones my colleagues?
4. Do I have enough CPU power for evaluation of the data?
5. Do I need a bioinformatician?
6. Do I have appropriate databases to which my data can be compared?
Questions about data analysis and interpretation
1. How do I have to interpret the data?
2. Which statistical tests can I use?
3. How do I judge the results if I work on public databases?
4. Can I compare directly my results with the results of other publications?
Answering these questions may help to find the right detection technique for a research
project. Coupling of different techniques can also be useful to obtain comprehensive analysis.
59
3. Chapter II: Development and validation of an oligonucleotide
microarray to characterize ectomycorrhizal communities
Marlis Reich, Annegret Kohler, Francis Martin and Marc Buée
(published in BMC Microbiology (2009) 9: 241)
60
BMC Microbiology
BioMed Central
Open Access
Methodology article
Development and validation of an oligonucleotide microarray to
characterise ectomycorrhizal fungal communities
Marlis Reich*, Annegret Kohler, Francis Martin and Marc Buée*
Address: UMR 1136 INRA/Nancy Université Interactions Arbres/Microorganimes, INRA Nancy, 54280 Champenoux, France
Email: Marlis Reich* - mreich1@gwdg.de; Annegret Kohler - kohler@nancy.inra.fr; Francis Martin - fmartin@nancy.inra.fr;
Marc Buée* - buee@nancy.inra.fr
* Corresponding authors
Published: 24 November 2009
BMC Microbiology 2009, 9:241
doi:10.1186/1471-2180-9-241
Received: 1 June 2009
Accepted: 24 November 2009
This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2180/9/241
© 2009 Reich et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0),
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Background: In forest ecosystems, communities of ectomycorrhizal fungi (ECM) are influenced
by several biotic and abiotic factors. To understand their underlying dynamics, ECM communities
have been surveyed with ribosomal DNA-based sequencing methods. However, most identification
methods are both time-consuming and limited by the number of samples that can be treated in a
realistic time frame. As a result of ongoing implementation, the array technique has gained
throughput capacity in terms of the number of samples and the capacity for parallel identification
of several species. Thus far, although phylochips (microarrays that are used to detect species) have
been mostly developed to trace bacterial communities or groups of specific fungi, no phylochip has
been developed to carry oligonucleotides for several ectomycorrhizal species that belong to
different genera.
Results: We have constructed a custom ribosomal DNA phylochip to identify ECM fungi. Specific
oligonucleotide probes were targeted to the nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions from
95 fungal species belonging to 21 ECM fungal genera. The phylochip was first validated using PCR
amplicons of reference species. Ninety-nine percent of the tested oligonucleotides generated
positive hybridisation signals with their corresponding amplicons. Cross-hybridisation was mainly
restricted at the genus level, particularly for Cortinarius and Lactarius species. The phylochip was
subsequently tested with environmental samples that were composed of ECM fungal DNA from
spruce and beech plantation fungal communities. The results were in concordance with the ITS
sequencing of morphotypes and the ITS clone library sequencing results that were obtained using
the same PCR products.
Conclusion: For the first time, we developed a custom phylochip that is specific for several
ectomycorrhizal fungi. To overcome cross-hybridisation problems, specific filter and evaluation
strategies that used spot signal intensity were applied. Evaluation of the phylochip by hybridising
environmental samples confirmed the possible application of this technology for detecting and
monitoring ectomycorrhizal fungi at specific sites in a routine and reproducible manner.
Page 1 of 11
(page number not for citation purposes)
61
BMC Microbiology 2009, 9:241
Background
Ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi form a mutualistic symbiosis with tree roots and play key roles in forest ecosystems.
In return for receiving nutrients and water from the soil
via the roots, they receive carbohydrates as photosynthate
from their host plants [1]. As is the case for other soil fungal species, the composition of the ECM community is
affected by both biotic and abiotic factors; these include
climate changes, seasons, soil micro-site heterogeneity,
soil and litter quality, host tree species and forest management [2-6]. To describe in more detail the impact of environmental factors on community composition, longterm, year-round monitoring and a detailed spatial
description of the community has to be carried out. However, analyses are very often hindered by a limited sample
number and by the ephemeral or cryptic lifestyle of the
fungi [7,8].
Over the last fifteen years, PCR-based molecular methods
and DNA sequencing of nuclear and mitochondrial ribosomal DNA have been used routinely to identify mycorrhizal fungi [9]. However, these methods are timeconsuming and are limited in the number of samples that
can be treated in a realistic time frame [10]. With automated molecular genotyping techniques, appropriate
DNA databases [11] and a better knowledge of ITS variability within fungal species [12], identification of fungal
taxa in environmental samples can now be expanded
from the aforementioned methods to high-throughput
molecular diagnostic tools, such as phylochips [13]. So
far, DNA arrays have been mainly used for genome-wide
transcription profiling [14,15], but also for the identification of bacterial species from complex environmental
samples [16] or for the identification of a few genera of
pathogenic fungi and Oomycetes [17,18]. Phylochips
may comprise up to several thousand probes that target
phylogenetic marker genes, such as 16S rRNA in bacteria
or the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region in fungi
[19]; indeed, the latter is one of the most widely used barcoding regions for fungi [20]. Phylochips have several
advantages over traditional approaches, including higher
specificity, cost efficiency, rapid identification and detection of target organisms, and the high numbers of samples
throughput; therefore, they are increasingly used for the
detection of bacterial and pathogenic fungi [21,22]. In the
ECM fungal ecology field, the first application of ribosomal DNA arrays was reported by Bruns and Gardes [23];
they developed a specific phylochip (on nylon membranes) to detect Suilloid fungi. Recently, this approach
has also been used for truffle identification [24]. To the
best of our knowledge, no study has reported the construction and application of an ECM fungal phylochip to
detect a large number of ECM fungal species that belong
to various genera from environmental samples.
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2180/9/241
Here, we report the first application of a custom ribosomal ITS phylochip to describe the community composition of ECM fungi on roots. The phylochip carried specific
oligonucleotides for 95 fungal species that belong to 25
ECM fungal genera. The specificity of the oligonucleotides
was evaluated using ITS amplicons of known reference
species. The method was then used to describe ECM fungal communities that were obtained from 30-year-old
spruce and beech plantations. To validate the phylochip,
morphotyping and ITS sequencing of the ECM root tips,
together with sequencing of ITS clone libraries, were carried out. We discuss the pros and cons of the phylochip in
comparison to conventional approaches, and outline its
potential applications for environmental monitoring.
Results
Identification of ECM fungi from environmental samples
by morphotyping/ITS sequencing and sequencing of ITS
clone libraries
By combining morphotyping and ITS sequencing of individual ECM root tips, and sequencing of ITS clone libraries, 26 fungal species were identified on the roots of beech
and spruce trees; these included 25 ECM fungi (Table 1).
Rarefaction curves of clone library coverage nearly
reached a plateau, which indicated a near complete sampling of the ECM species in the soil samples that were
taken from under the beech and spruce. In order to detect
only one more species from spruce samples and a further
two species from beech samples, it would be necessary to
increase the sequencing effort two-fold (Additional file 1).
The species richness was very similar for the two plantations, with 13 and 16 species being associated with spruce
and beech, respectively; however, the community compositions were clearly distinct. Only three ECM taxa were
found on the root tips of both hosts: Cenococcum
geophilum, Xerocomus pruinatus and Tomentellopsis submollis
(Table 1). Sequencing of the ITS clone libraries or identification of individual ECM morphotypes revealed similar
fungal ECM profiles. Most fungi that were detected on
spruce roots by sequencing of the ITS library were also
detected by morphotyping (Additional file 2). Of these
morphotypes, nine were also supported by sequencing
the ITS of individual morphotypes (Table 1). One taxon
was only identified with morphotyping and ITS-sequencing of individual ECM morphotypes, and another was
identified only by morphotyping. Overall, 9 of 13 taxa
(69%) from the spruce roots were identified by both
molecular methods. A total of 10 of 16 taxa (62.5%) from
the beech roots were identified by both approaches.
Sequencing of the ITS clone libraries resulted in the detection of an additional two taxa. One of these was related to
an unidentified endophyte, which was difficult to identify
by morphotyping alone as it is likely leaving inside the
root tissues (Table 1). A single taxon was identified only
by the morphotyping/ITS sequencing approach, and three
Page 2 of 11
(page number not for citation purposes)
62
BMC Microbiology 2009, 9:241
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2180/9/241
Table 1: Fungal taxa identified on root tip samples from spruce and beech by sequencing of the ITS clone libraries of the pooled ECM
tips and morphotyping/ITS sequencing of the individual ECM root tips.
Species name
Pooled ECM tips
ITS cloning/ITS sequencing
Acc. n°
Identities (%)
(Unite䉬/NCBI❍)
Individual ECM tips
Morphotyping/ITS sequencing
Acc. n°
Identities (%)
(Unite䉬/NCBI❍)
ECM from Picea abies:
Thelephora terrestris
Cenococcum geophilum
Clavulina cristata
Atheliaceae (Piloderma) sp
Cortinarius sp 1
Xerocomus pruinatus
Tomentelopsis submollis
Inocybe sp
Xerocomus badius
Tylospora asterophora
Tylospora fibrillosa
Sebacina sp
Lactarius sp 1
EU427330.1
UDB002297
UDB001121
AY097053.1
AJ889974.1
UDB000018
AM086447.1
AY751555.1
UDB000080
UDB002469
AF052563.1
not detected
not detected
360/363 (100)❍
375/379 (98)䉬
375/375 (100)䉬
343/362 (94)❍
361/367 (98)❍
348/351 (99)䉬
319/324 (98)❍
249/266 (93)❍
375/379 (98)䉬
353/354 (99)䉬
405/408 (99)❍
UDB000971
UDB002297
UDB 001121
EU597016.1
UDB002224
UDB 000016
ECM from Fagus sylvatica:
Pezizales sp
Sebacinaceae sp
Laccaria amethystina
Endophyte
Inocybe napipes
Xerocomus pruinatus
Cortinarius sp 2
Cortinarius sp 3
Cortinarius tortuosus
Russula puellaris
Tomentellopsis submollis
Laccaria laccata
Cenococcum geophilum
Amanita rubescens
Lactarius sp 2
Tomentella sp
UDB002381
EF619763.1
UDB002418
AY268198.1
UDB000017
UDB000483
UDB002410
UDB002170
UDB002164
UDB000010
UDB000198
UDB000104
not detected
not detected
not detected
not detected
28/28 (100)䉬
327/347 (94)❍
356/360 (98)䉬
205/243 (84)❍
292/294 (99)䉬
241/242 (99)䉬
416/437 (95)䉬
306/316 (96)䉬
279/284 (98)䉬
313/315 (99)䉬
272/273 (99)䉬
322/327 (98)䉬
DQ990873.1
EF195570.1
UDB002418
not detected
UDB000017
UDB000483
UDB002410
UDB002445
not detected
UDB000010
UDB000198
UDB000769
UDB002297
UDB000080
UDB002469
AJ0534922.1
UDB000975
142/151 (94)䉬
211/216 (97)䉬
281/289 (97)䉬
612/624 (98)❍
232/242 (95)䉬
692/696 (99)䉬
morphotyping only
morphotyping only
400/417 (95)䉬
591/594 (99)䉬
561/578 (97)❍
162/168 (96)䉬
morphotyping only
602/646 (93)❍
495/497 (99)❍
276/277 (99)䉬
148/155 (95)䉬
279/288 (96)䉬
227/239 (95)䉬
57/59 (96)䉬
246/247 (99)䉬
224/228 (98)䉬
283/283 (100)䉬
216/222 (97)䉬
morphotyping only
morphotyping only
morphotyping only
For the sequence homology search, BLASTN was carried out with the NCBI (❍) and UNITE (䉬) databases. Accession numbers (Acc. n°) and
identities are given.
taxa were identified only by morphotyping. Using ITS1F
and ITS4 primers [9] or NSI1/NLB4 [25], the ITS region
from six ECM morphotypes (Amanita rubescens, Inocybe sp
1, Lactarius sp 1 + 2, Tomentella sp 1, Tomentellopsis submollis) were not amplified. The ITS regions from four fungi
(A. rubescens, Lactarius sp 1 + 2, Tomentella sp 1) of those
six morphotypes were also not amplified using the ITS
clone library approach (Table 1). However, the use of the
second primer pair, NSl1/NLB4, enabled the molecular
biological characterisation of four morphotypes (Piloderma sp., Sebacinaceae sp., Sebacina sp. and Pezizales sp.)
that were not amplified with ITS1f/ITS4.
Specificity of designed oligonucleotides
The specificity of the 95 designed oligonucleotides (Additional file 3) was evaluated using PCR amplicons that
were generated from sporocarp tissues. PCR amplicons
mainly hybridised to the phylochip oligonucleotides
according to the expected patterns (Figure 1), and the patterns were highly reproducible in the replications conducted with each of the templates. The hybridisation
signal intensities ranged from -22 (background value) to
44,835 units. Ninety-nine percent of the oligonucleotides
tested generated positive hybridisation signals with their
matching ITS. Cross-hybridisations were mainly observed
within the Cortinarius and Lactarius species complex.
Among the Boletaceae species, a few cross-hybridisations
were observed between the species that belonged to the
Boletus and Xerocomus genera. Within the Amanita, Russula
or Tricholoma genus, rare cross-reactions occurred between
single sequences from closely related species.
Page 3 of 11
(page number not for citation purposes)
63
BMC Microbiology 2009, 9:241
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2180/9/241
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
+
*
-
+
-
Figure 1
Hybridisation
reactions of the species-specific fungal oligonucleotides
Hybridisation reactions of the species-specific fungal oligonucleotides. Reactions were tested by hybridising known
fungal ITS pools to the phylochip. Vertical line indicates the fungal species used in the fungal ITS pools (hybridised probes), and
the horizontal lines list the species-specific oligonucleotides. Grey boxes denote the positive hybridisation signals of an oligonucleotide obtained after threshold subtraction. The accompanying tree showing the phylogenetic relationship between tested
fungal species was produced by the MEGAN programme. The size of the circle beside the genus name indicates the number of
species of this genus used in the cross-hybridisation test.
Identification of ECM species in root samples using
phylochip
The ITS amplicons that were obtained from the two different environmental root samples were labelled and hybridised to the phylochips. The phylochip analysis confirmed
the presence of most of the ECM fungi that were detected
with the morphotyping, with the ITS sequencing of individual ECM tips, and with the ITS clone library
approaches that were obtained using the same PCR products (Table 2). The exceptions included the following fungal species for which corresponding oligonucleotides on
the phylochips were lacking: Pezizales sp, Atheliaceae (Piloderma) sp, Sebacina sp, Sebacinaceae sp, and unknown
endophytic species. The inability to detect these four morphotyped ECM fungal species by molecular typing sug-
gests that these morphological identifications could be
incorrect (Table 2).
Comparison of the abundance of sequences analysed by
the cloning/sequencing approach and the species detection via the phylochip approach, indicated that the phylochip has the potential to detect taxa represented by
approx. 2% of a DNA type in an environmental DNA sample. However, to assess the sensitivity of the current custom phylochip in more detail, further analyses will be
carried out.
Discussion
Many different environmental factors influence the
dynamics and the spatiotemporal structure of ECM com-
Page 4 of 11
(page number not for citation purposes)
64
BMC Microbiology 2009, 9:241
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2180/9/241
Table 2: Detection of fungal taxa from root tips of spruce and beech using different identification approaches.
Species name
samples from Picea abies
Thelephora terrestris
Cenococcum geophilum
Clavulina cristata
Atheliaceae (Piloderma) sp
Cortinarius sp 1
Xerocomus pruinatus
Tomentellopsis submollis
Inocybe sp
Xerocomus badius
Tylospora asterophora
Tylospora fibrillosa
Sebacina sp
Cortinarius sp 2
Russula integra
Cortinarius alboviolaceus
Cortinarius traganus
Amanita muscaria
Lactarius sp1
ECM from Fagus sylvatica
Pezizales sp
Sebacinaceae sp
Laccaria amethystina
Endophyte sp.
Inocybe napipes
Xerocomus pruinatus
Cortinarius sp 2
Cortinarius sp 3
Cortinarius tortuosus
Russula puellaris
Tomentellopsis submollis
Laccaria laccata
Cenococcum geophilum
Cortinarius sp 1
Cortinarius hinnuleus
Russula integra
Laccaria bicolor
Amanita rubescens
Lactarius sp2
Tomentella sp
Morphotyping/ITS sequencing
of individual ECM tips
ITS cloning/sequencing
of ECM tip pools
Phylochip
x
x
x
x
x
x
morphotyping only
morphotyping only
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
no oligonucleotide
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
no oligonucleotide
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
no oligonucleotide
no oligonucleotide
x
no oligonucleotide
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
morphotyping only
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
morphotyping only
morphotyping only
morphotyping only
munities [26,27,5,4]. A better understanding of the mechanisms underlying these dynamics will require year-round
ECM monitoring at incrementally increased spatial resolutions. However, the limited number of samples that can
currently be analysed hinders the use of molecular
approaches for large-scale studies. With the ongoing
development of high-throughput molecular diagnostic
tools, such as DNA oligoarrays [19] and 454 pyrosequencing [28], larger scale surveys (in terms of both the frequency and depth of analysis) of soil fungi are now
possible. Ecologically relevant sample throughput in the
in the 100 to 1000 range is now accessible. So far, phylochips have been used for the identification of bacteria
[29], viruses [30], and a few genera of closely related fungal species [18].
In the present study, we constructed a custom ribosomal
DNA phylochip for the identification of ECM fungi that
was based on the ITS1 and ITS2 regions. One of the great
advantages of using ITS regions for oligonucleotide design
is the high number of sequences that are available in public databases [12]. Furthermore, these regions are some of
the most frequently used regions for the barcoding of
ECM fungi [20], and compared to other possible barcoding regions, they show a high specificity at the species
level [31]. We designed a total of 95 oligonucleotides,
Page 5 of 11
(page number not for citation purposes)
65
BMC Microbiology 2009, 9:241
from which 89 were species-specific for ECM fungal species. According to regular fruiting body surveys, these 89
ECM species are the most common species to be found in
the long-term observatory of the Breuil-Chenue forest
over the last ten years [32]. The ease with which highquality species-specific oligonucleotides could be selected
(mismatch in the middle of the designed oligonucleotide,
without forming secondary structures), depended on the
fungal genera. For example, the ITS sequences of Laccaria
species showed only a few discriminative nucleotides that
were spread as single nucleotide polymorphisms over the
ITS1 and ITS2 regions. Consequently, prior to synthesis,
oligonucleotide sequences were screened in silico for the
presence of fortuitous similarities with fungal ITS
sequences for which they were not designed.
The specificity of the spotted oligonucleotides was tested
by hybridising ITS amplicons from reference species. Most
of the oligonucleotides exhibited the expected hybridisation patterns (99% of the tested probes gave a positive signal with their corresponding ITS amplicon). However,
cross-hybridisation was observed and it accumulated particularly in the genera Cortinarius or Lactarius that targeted
other species in the same genus (Figure 1). With an estimated 2,000 spp. worldwide, Cortinarius is the most species-rich genus of mushroom-forming ECM fungi. Species
delimitation within this genus is often controversial [33].
For these cryptic species, as for Lactarius or Inocybe species,
the phylogenetic separation of species is ambiguous;
indeed, most of these fungi have less than 3% intra-specific variability in the ITS region of their nuclear ribosomal DNA [34]. To keep cross-hybridisation low, we used
a two-step data filtering process that involved: (i) accepting only spots with a significantly higher signal intensity
value than the one obtained for the negative controls and,
(ii) the requirement for a positive signal for at least four of
the six replicates of one spot (see Methods). The hybridisation results were identical over the different replicates.
To test whether the current custom phylochip could be
utilised in environmental studies that sought to describe
the composition of an ECM community, ITS amplicons of
root samples taken from beech and spruce plantations
were hybridised to the array. As the focus of the current
study was the validation of the phylochip, rather than an
ecological study of the whole ECM fungal communities of
the two plantations, a total of only six soil cores were
used. The results of the phylochip were compared to the
results that were obtained from the morphotyping/ITSsequencing of individual ECM morphotypes and the
sequencing of ITS clone libraries. Provided that the corresponding oligonucleotides were included on the array, all
species that were detected by cloning-sequencing could
also be identified with the phylochip. As the corresponding oligonucleotides were lacking on the phylochip, spe-
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2180/9/241
cies belonging to the Atheliaceae, Sebacinaceae or Pezizales
were not detected. Furthermore, the comparison of array
signal intensity with ITS sequence frequency in the ITS
clone library revealed the potential of the phylochip to
detect taxa that were represented by approx. 2% of DNA
types in the amplified DNA sample. However, the quantitative potential of this custom phylochip remains to be
further accessed as bias linked to the PCR amplification
could take place. The phylochip also detected species that
were not expected according to the results obtained from
the use of the other two approaches. This could be due to
cross-hybridisations and/or to the fact that these underrepresented species in the community could not be
detected by the other approaches as the rarefaction curves
of the ITS library sequencing method did not reach a plateau (Additional file 1).
When compared to each other, both of the other
approaches provided similar, but not identical, profiles of
the ECM communities. Approximately 70% of the species
were detected using either method individually (Table 1).
For the beech sample, three species were detected only by
morphotyping as the PCR amplification of their DNA
using ITS1F/ITS4 and/or NSI1/NLB4 primer pairs failed.
Tedersoo et al. [35] showed that PCR of ITS from several
ECM species failed using these universal fungal rDNA
primers, and they stressed the need for additional taxonspecific PCR primers to be used for comprehensive genotyping of ECM communities. One of the morphotypes
detected in the beech sample was a Lactarius species. In the
same root sample, a Pezizales species was found by ITSsequencing and cloning/sequencing; this suggests a possible co-colonisation of the ECM root tip [36]. ECM root
tips can be colonised by more than one fungal taxon, by
two different ECM species, or by one ECM species and an
endophytic or parasitic species. Typically, these species are
overlooked by the use of only morphotyping, but they can
be detected by molecular biological approaches.
Conclusion
In this study, we demonstrated that identification of ECM
fungi in environmental studies is possible using a custom
phylochip. The detection of most of the species by the
phylochip was confirmed by two other widely used detection methods. Although the possible application of the
phylochip technique to other study areas is dependent on
the fungal species to be analysed, high-quality sequence
support for several temperate and boreal forest ecosystems is found in databases such as UNITE [11]. For the
next generation of phylochips, we will add additional species-specific probes or use additional marker gene regions
in the probe design to overcome the small number of
observed cross-hybridisations. In addition, we will
increase the number of specific oligonucleotides that are
spotted onto the phylochip (up to 10,000) to adapt to the
Page 6 of 11
(page number not for citation purposes)
66
BMC Microbiology 2009, 9:241
taxonomic diversity found in soils at the study sites.
Small-scale phylochips, so-called "boutique" arrays, such
as the one designed in this study, are a time-saving and
cheap approach for monitoring specific fungal species
over years and/or in several hundred of samples. At the
present time, the detection of a single species with our custom phylochip cost only one sixth of the price paid for the
cloning/sequencing approach. The upscaling of detectable
species on the phylochip (up to 10,000) will further lower
the cost (by a factor of twenty). Thus, the phylochip
approach should be an attractive method for routine,
accurate and reproducible monitoring of fungal species
on specific sites, in which a high sample throughput is
required.
Methods
Site description and root sampling
The Breuil-Chenue experimental site is a temperate forest
located in the Morvan Mountains (47°18'10"N,
4°4'44"E, France) at 650 m. The parent rock is granite and
the soil is an alocrisol that is characterised by a pH ranging
between 4 and 4.5, with moder type humus and micropodzolisation features in the upper mineral horizon. In
1976, a part of the original stand, composed mainly of
beech (90% of the stems), oak and young birch on a
homogeneous soil type, was clear-cut. Subsequently,
beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and spruce (Picea abies (L.) H.
Karsten) were planted separately in 20 m by 20 m adjacent
stands [37].
Sampling of the root tips was performed in each stand
(beech and spruce) in October 2007. A drill was used to
obtain three soil cores (4 cm diameter × 10 cm depth)
from each of the two treatments, along 18 m transects in
the middle of each of the two plantations. The distance
between the soil cores was 6 m, and the samples were collected at distances of more than 0.5 m from the trees or
the stumps. Soil cores were immediately transported to
the laboratory in isotherm boxes and stored at 4°C.
Within five days, the roots were manually separated from
the adhering soil, gently washed, and then examined
under a stereomicroscope at 40×. Morphological typing of
all of the ECM tips (approximately 50-250 tips per sample) was performed according to Agerer [38].
ITS sequencing
An individual ECM root tip from each ECM morphotype
was selected for molecular characterisation by ITS
sequencing. The remainders of the ECM root tips in each
sample were used for ITS amplification, cloning and
sequencing, and phylochip analysis (Figure 2). The samples were conserved at -20°C. DNA was extracted from
single ECM root tips, or from the pooled ECM tips, and it
was subjected to PCR amplification to produce a specific
ITS amplicon or a heterogeneous mixture of ITS sequences
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2180/9/241
(Figure 2), respectively. ITS amplicons from single tips
were directly sequenced. Heterogeneous mixtures of
sequences were either used to construct ITS clone libraries
or used directly for phylochip hybridisation.
The ECM roots (up to 100 mg fresh weight depending on
the sample) were freeze-dried and ground in a ball mill
MM200 (Retsch®, Haan, Germany). Ground tissue was
resuspended in 400 μl AP1 buffer from the DNeasy Plant
Mini Kit (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France), and the DNA was
extracted according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Purified DNA was solubilised in dH2O (~100 ng/μl) and
stored at -80°C. The ITS was amplified as described in
Buée et al. [5], using primers ITS1F and ITS4 [9] and/or
NSI1 and NLB4 [25]. PCR products were purified using a
96-well filtration system (MultiScreen-PCR plates, Millipore Corporation, MA, USA) and sequenced with ITS1F
and/or ITS4 primers and the Genome Lab DTCS Quick
Start Kit (Beckman Coulter, Roissy CDG, France), using a
CEQ 8000XL sequencer and the CEQ 8000 Genetic Analysis System. ITS sequences were assembled with the
Sequencher program for Macintosh, version 4.1.2 (Gene
Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), when sharing ≥
97.0% identity. To identify the ECM fungi, BlastN was
performed using ITS sequences that are available in the
following
public
databases:
NCBI
http://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, UNITE http://unite.ut.ee/ and
MycorWeb http://mycor.nancy.inra.fr/. ECM fungal morphotypes were considered to be identified at the species
level when they shared ≥ 97% of their ITS region sequence
identity with a sequence in these public databases [35].
Sporocarp collection and taxonomic identification
Three times per year, during the autumnal periods of 2004
to 2007, fungal sporocarps of all epigeous fungi were surveyed at the Breuil-Chenue experimental site, and mature
fungal fruiting bodies that exhibited all the characteristics
necessary for an unequivocal identification, were collected. An expert mycologist, Jean Paul Maurice (Groupe
Mycologique Vosgien, 88300 Neufchâteau, France), used
traditional mycological methods for taxonomic determination of the sporocarps [39]. They were named according
to the new "French Reference of Mycology" http://
www.mycofrance.org. Samples were taken from the inner
cap tissue (50-100 mg) and ground using a ball mill MM
200 (Retsch). DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Plant
Mini Kit (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) following the
manufacturer's instructions. The ITS regions were amplified as described above, and they were used for hybridising the phylochips to assess the specificity of the designed
oligonucleotides (see below).
Cloning and sequencing of ITS
Prior to cloning, the amplified ITS products that were
obtained from the bulk ECM tips of all soil cores were
Page 7 of 11
(page number not for citation purposes)
67
BMC Microbiology 2009, 9:241
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2180/9/241
Fungal sporocarps
Environmental samples
ECM morphotyping
ECM community samples
Morphological
identification
DNA extraction and PCR
amplification
DNA extraction, PCR
amplification, sequencing
Single morphotype samples
DNA extraction and PCR
amplification
Sequencing of single
morphotypes
Mix of max. 6 different
amplicons
Cloning
phylochip hybridization
Sequencing
Analysis of Data
Figure
The
different
2
procedures used for molecular genotyping of ECM root tips and evaluation of the phylochip
The different procedures used for molecular genotyping of ECM root tips and evaluation of the phylochip.
DNA was extracted from individual ECM root tips or from pooled ECM root tips and subjected to PCR amplification to produce specific ECM ITS sequence or a heterogeneous mixture of ITS sequences, respectively. Individual ITS sequences were
directly sequenced. The heterogeneous mixture of ITS sequences (ITS clone libraries) were either separated into individual
molecules by cloning in bacterial plasmids or used directly for microarray hybridisation. The results of these three different
technical approaches were analysed and compared. In addition, to test the specificity of the spotted oligonucleotides, the phylochips were hybridised with a heterogeneous mixture of ITS sequences from identified fungal sporocarps.
pooled to obtain only two samples: one sample each for
the beech and spruce plantations. The amplified ITS fragments were cloned into Escherichia coli plasmids with the
TOPO TA Cloning Kit, using the pCR®2.1-TOPO plasmid
vector with a LacZα gene and One Shot DH5α chemically
competent Escherichia coli, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen, Cergy Pontoise Cedex,
France). Seventy white recombinant colonies were
selected; they were cultured overnight in LB medium and
then frozen in glycerol at -80°C. Three microlitres of these
bacterial suspensions were used directly for PCR, amplifying the inserts with M13-F (5'-GTAAAACGACGGCCAG3') and M13-R (5'-CAGGAAACAGCTATGAC-3') primers.
PCR was performed using the following protocol: initial
denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of
94°C for 1 min, 50°C for 30 s and 72°C for 3 min, with
a final extension step at 72°C for 15 min. The PCR products were purified with MultiScreen HTS™ PCR filter plates
(Millipore, Molsheim, France). Sequencing was per-
formed with a CEQ 8000XL sequencer (as described
above), in which the ITS1F and ITS4 primer pairs were
used to obtain sequences with lengths of up to 600 bp that
included the ITS1 region and part of the ITS2 region.
Sequences were edited as described above. The sequences
can be accessed in public databases using the accession
number FN545289 - 545352. In addition, a rarefaction
analysis was performed to measure the proportion of the
estimated diversity that could be reached by sequence
effort using the freeware software Analytic Rarefaction version
1.3
http://www.uga.edu/strata/software/Soft
ware.html.
Design of specific ITS oligonucleotide probes
To design specific ITS oligonucleotide probes for 89 ECM
species, 368 ITS sequences of 171 ECM fungal species
(around 600 bp) were aligned with the MultAlin program
[40]. To take into account intraspecific ITS variability and
sequencing errors, several ITS sequences from a number of
Page 8 of 11
(page number not for citation purposes)
68
BMC Microbiology 2009, 9:241
different species were used for the alignment. Single
nucleotide polymorphisms and indels were identified by
manual curation. The sequences, including the ITS1, 5.8S
and ITS2 regions of the nuclear rRNA genes, were
obtained from the public databases NCBI and UNITE.
Perfectly matching oligonucleotides, 67 to 70 bases in
length, were designed for each ITS sequence within the
ITS1 or ITS2 regions. They were selected for optimal melting temperatures (Tm; 75°C ± 2.5°C) and GC content
(45-55%) using the AmplifX 1.37 software http://
ifrjr.nord.univ-mrs.fr/AmplifX. To enhance specificity,
oligonucleotides that had selective nucleotides located in
a central position were favoured. The specificity of the oligoprobes was first tested in silico by querying the oligonucleotide sequences against the UNITE and NCBI
databases. An oligonucleotide was designed as a positive
hybridisation control on the ITS region of Arabidopsis thaliana. Five additional 62- to 70-mer oligonucleotides that
matched the LSU region of the Glomeromycota were used
to measure the background signal resulting from unspecific hybridisation. To avoid cross-hybridisations with
undescribed species or cryptic species, we did not use the
ITS region of untargeted fungal groups as a negative control.
Spotting of glass slide microarray and hybridisation
conditions
The 95 species-specific oligonucleotides (see above) were
spotted; one well was spotted with only hybridisation
buffer. Solutions of species-specific oligonucleotides were
adjusted to a concentration of 600 pM and printed in triplicate by Eurofins, MWG/Operon (Cologne, Germany) on
slide arrays with an activated epoxide surface. Oligonucleotides were bound via their 5' ends on the coating layer of
the
glass
surface
(for
details,
see
http://
www.operon.com). Arrays were prehybridised using the
OpArray Pre-Hyb solution (Eurofins, MWG/Operon)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. PCR-generated amplicons (maximal 30 ng/μl) were labelled with
Alexa Fluor® 555 dye (Invitrogen, Cergy Pontoise, France)
using the BioPrime® Plus Array CGH Indirect Genomic
Labelling System Kit (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's instructions. After the last purification step,
labelled amplicons were concentrated with a vacuum concentrator centrifuge UNIVAPO 100 H (UNIEQUIP, Martinsried, Germany), and then dissolved in 7 μl sterile
water. The sample hybridisation procedure followed
Rinaldi et al. [41] and is fully described in sample series
GSM162978 in the GEO at NCBI http://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/. Slide arrays were scanned
using a GenePix 4000 B scanner (Axon-Molecular
Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) at a wavelength of 532 nm
for the Alexa Fluor 555 dye. Fluorescent images were captured as TIFF files and the signal intensity was quantified
by GenePix Pro 5.0 software (Axon-Molecular Devices).
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2180/9/241
Specificity of oligonucleotides and validation of the
phylochip
To validate the specificity of the designed oligonucleotides, PCR-amplified ITS fragments from the sporocarp
tissues of known fungal species were hybridised (Figure
2). Prior to hybridisation, amplicons (5 ng/μl) from three
to six different ITS amplicons were mixed in a 1:1 ratio.
Species-specific ITS within a mix were chosen based on
the in silico tested species phylogenetic distance (minimal
30% bp differences were observed between the oligonucleotides of one species and the ITS sequences of the other
species in the mix). In total, 74 fungal species were probed
via the fungal amplicon mixes. The PCR product that was
amplified from the ITS region of Arabidopsis thaliana was
added to all amplicon mixes (at a concentration of 5 ng/
μl) as a positive hybridisation control. To test the possible
use of this custom phylochip for describing ECM community composition in environmental samples, 10 μl of the
PCR product that was amplified from the bulked ECM
root tips of beech and spruce was used (spiked with the
amplicon of Arabidopsis thaliana). Six technical replicates
were carried out for each sample (three block replications
per slide × two slides per sample). The results of the crosshybridisation test are outlined in Figure 1. The ITS-based
cladogram was constructed for all tested fungal species
using the default setting of the MEGAN software (version
3.0.2., [42]).
Array evaluation
Prior to further analyses, spots exhibiting poor quality (for
example, as a result of the presence of dust) were flagged
and excluded from the analyses. Hybridisation quality
was surveyed using the positive (oligonucleotides of Arabidopsis thaliana) and negative controls (five oligonucleotides for the Glomeromycota (non-ECM species) and the
one spot spotted with only hybridisation buffer) of each
array. Data of the array were further used when (i) signal
intensity values of the positive controls were within the
group of oligonucleotides that showed the highest signal
intensity values and (ii) the mean signal intensity value of
the negative controls were a maximal 1.5% of the signal
intensity with the highest value.
Individual spots were considered to be positive (species
present in the sample) if their signal intensity showed a
value that was five-fold higher than the averaged intensity
value for all of the negative controls. Additionally, at least
four of the six replicates per spot were required to generate
a significant positive hybridisation. The threshold factor
was fixed to five-fold after evaluation of the results of the
arrays that were hybridised with the known amplicon
mixes derived from sporocarp tissues (see "Sporocarp collection" and "Specificity of oligonucleotides"). Using a
threshold factor of "5" defined the minimal 90% of all
Page 9 of 11
(page number not for citation purposes)
69
BMC Microbiology 2009, 9:241
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2180/9/241
species in the amplicon mixes as positive and filtered
most false-positives (cross-hybridisation).
3.
Authors' contributions
4.
MR conceived and designed the array, set-up the clone
library, acquired, analysed, and interpreted the data and
drafted the manuscript. AK analysed and interpreted the
array data. FM conceived and directed the project and
drafted the manuscript. MB carried out the morphotyping
and sequencing of the ECM root tips, drafted the manuscript and co-directed the project. All authors read and
approved the final manuscript.
Additional material
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Additional file 1
Rarefied species accumulation curve of fungal species detected in ECM
root tip samples of (A) spruce and (B) beech. Figures of the rarefaction
curves of detected fungal species in ECM root tips of spruce and beech.
Click here for file
[http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/supplementary/14712180-9-241-S1.PDF]
11.
Additional file 2
12.
Species described by morphotyping with description of observed morphotypes according to Agerer (1987-2001). List of all ECM species
detected by morphotyping and detailed description of their morphotypes.
Click here for file
[http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/supplementary/14712180-9-241-S2.PDF]
13.
10.
14.
Additional file 3
Sequences of the 95 species-specific oligonucleotides. List of sequences
of the 95 designed species-specific oligonucleotides.
Click here for file
[http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/supplementary/14712180-9-241-S3.PDF]
15.
Acknowledgements
MR is supported by a Marie Curie PhD scholarship within the framework
of the TraceAM programme. The array approach was partly funded by
INRA, the European projects TraceAM and ENERGYPOPLAR, the European Network of Excellence EVOLTREE, and the Typstat project (GIP
ECOFOR). We would like to thank Dr. Melanie Jones (University of British
Columbia Okanagan) for her critical reading of the manuscript and helpful
comments. We also thank Christine Delaruelle (INRA-Nancy) for her technical assistance with the ITS sequencing. Three anonymous referees are
acknowledged for their valuable input and comments on the manuscript
and on the development of the technique.
16.
17.
18.
19.
References
1.
2.
Smith SE, Read DJ: Mycorrhizal Symbiosis 3rd edition. London: Academic Press; 2008.
Erland S, Taylor AFS: Diversity of Ecto-mycorrhizal Fungal
Communities in Relation to the Abiotic Environment. In
Mycorrhizal Ecology Edited by: van der Heijden M, Sanders I. Berlin,
Heidelberg: MGA Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2002:163-200.
20.
21.
Rosling A, Landeweert R, Lindahl BD, Larsson KH, Kuyper TW, Taylor AFS, Finlay RD: Vertical distribution of ectomycorrhizal
fungal taxa in a podzol soil profile.
New Phytol 2003,
159:775-783.
Koide RT, Shumway DL, Xu B, Sharda JN: On temporal partitioning of a community of ectomycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 2007,
174:420-429.
Buée M, Vairelles D, Garbaye J: Year-round monitoring of diversity and potential metabolic activity of the ectomycorrhizal
community in a beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest subjected to
two thinning regimes. Mycorrhiza 2005, 15:235-245.
Ishida TA, Nara K, Hogetsu T: Host effects on ectomycorrhizal
fungal communities: insight from eight host species in mixed
conifer-broadleaf forests. New Phytol 2007, 174:430-440.
Hedh J, Samson P, Erland S, Tunlid A: Multiple gene genealogies
and species recognition in the ectomycorrhizal fungus Paxillus involutus. Mycol Res 2008, 112:965-975.
Horton TR, Bruns TD: The molecular revolution in ectomycorrhizal ecology: peeking into the black-box. Mol Ecol 2001,
10:1855-1871.
Gardes M, Bruns TD: ITS primers with enhanced specificity for
basidiomycetes - applications to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 1993, 2:113-118.
Anderson IC: Molecular Ecology of Ectomycorrhizal Fungal
Communities: New Frontiers. Molecular approaches to Soil, Rhizosphere and Plant Microorganism analysis 2006:183-192.
Kõljalg U, Larsson KH, Abarenkov K, Nilsson RH, Alexander IJ, Eberhardt U, Erland S, Hoiland K, Kjøller R, Larsson E, Pennanen T, Sen R,
Taylor AFS, Tedersoo L, Vralstad T, Ursing BM: UNITE: a database
providing web-based methods for the molecular identification of ectomycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 2005, 166:1063-1068.
Nilsson RH, Kristiansson E, Ryberg M, Hallenberg N, Larsson KH:
Intraspecific ITS variability in the Kingdom Fungi as
expressed in the International Sequence Databases and its
implications for molecular species identification. Evol Bioinformatics 2008, 4:193-201.
Martin F, Slater H: New Phytologist - an evolving host for ectomycorrhizal research. New Phytol 2007, 174:225-228.
Le Quéré A, Schuetzenduebel A, Rajashekar B, Canbäck B, Hedh J,
Erland S, Johannson T, Tunlid A: Divergence in gene expression
related to variation in host specificity of an ectomycorrhizal
fungus. Mol Ecol 2004, 13:3809-3819.
Martin F, Aerts A, Ahrén D, Brun A, Duchaussoy F, Kohler A,
Lindquist E, Salamov A, Shapiro HJ, Wuyts J, Blaudez D, Buée M,
Brokstein P, Canbäck B, Cohen D, Courty PE, Coutinho PM, Danchin
EGJ, Delaruelle C, Detter JC, Deveau A, DiFazio S, Duplessis S, Fraissinet-Tachet L, Lucic E, Frey-Klett P, Fourrey C, Feussner I, Gay G,
Gibon J, Grimwood J, Hoegger P, Jain P, Kilaru S, Labbé J, Lin YC, Le
Tacon F, Marmeisse R, Melayah D, Montanini B, Muratet M, Nehls U,
Niculita-Hirzel H, Oudot-Le Secq MP, Pereda V, Peter M, Quesneville
H, Rajashekar B, Reich M, Rouhier N, Schmutz J, Yin T, Chalot M,
Henrissat B, Kües U, Lucas S, Peer Y Van de, Podila G, Polle A, Pukkila
PJ, Richardson PM, Rouzé P, Sanders I, Stajich JE, Tunlid A, Tuskan G,
Grigoriev I: The genome sequence of the basidiomycete fungus Laccaria bicolor provides insights into the mycorrhizal
symbiosis. Nature 2008, 452:88-92.
Cook KL, Sayler GS: Environmental application of array technology: promise, problems and practicalities. Curr Opinion in
Biotechnol 2003, 14:311-318.
Leinberger DM, Schumacher U, Autenrieth IB, Bachmann TT: Development of a DNA Microarray for detection and identification of fungal pathogens involved in invasive mycoses. J Clin
Microbiol 2005, 43:4943-4953.
Tambong JT, de Cock AWAM, Tinker NA, Lévesque CA: Oligonucleotide array for identification and detection of pythium
species. AEM 2006, 72:2691-2706.
Sessitsch A, Hackl E, Wenzl P, Kilian A, Kostic T, Stralis-Pavese N,
Sandjong BT, Bodrossy L: Diagnostic microbial microarrays in
soil ecology. New Phytol 2006, 171:719-736.
Seifert KA: Integrating DNA barcoding into the mycological
sciences. Persoonia 2008, 21:162-166.
Peplies J, Lau SC, Pernthaler J, Amann R, Glockner FO: Application
and validation of DNA microarrays for the 16S rRNA-based
analysis of marine bacterioplankton. Envir Microbiol 2004,
6:638-645.
Page 10 of 11
(page number not for citation purposes)
70
BMC Microbiology 2009, 9:241
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
Lievens B, Brouwer M, Vanachter ACRC, Lévesque CA, Cammue
BPA, Thomma BPHJ: Design and development of a DNA array
for rapid detection and identification of multiple tomato vascular wilt pathogens. FEMS Microbioloy Letters 2003, 223:113-122.
Bruns TD, Gardes M: Molecular tools for the indentification of
ectomycorrhizal fungi - taxon specific oligonucleotide
probes for suilloid fungi. Mol Ecol 1993, 2:233-242.
El Karkouri K, Murat C, Zampieri E, Bonfante P: Identification of
ITS sequence motifs in truffles: a first step toward their DNA
barcoding. AEM 2007, 73:5320-5330.
Martin KJ, Rygiewicz RT: Fungal-specific PCR primers developed for analysis of the ITS region of environmental DNA
extracts. BMC Microbiol 2005, 5:28.
Dickie IA, Xu B, Koide T: Vertical niche differentiation of ectomycorrhizal hyphae in soil as shown by T-RFLP analysis. New
Phytol 2002, 156:527-535.
Genney DR, Anderson IC, Alexander IJ: Fine-scale distribution of
pine extomycorrhizas and their extrametrical mycelium.
New Phytol 2005, 170:381-390.
Rothberg JM, Leamon JH: The development and impact of 454
sequencing. Nature Biotechnol 2008, 26:1117-1124.
Volokhov DA, Rasooly K, Chumakov K, Rasooly A: Identification of
Listeria species by microarray based assay. J Clin Microbiol 2002,
40:4720-4728.
Townsend MB, Dawson ED, Mehlmann M, Smagala JA, Dankbar DM,
Moore CL, Smith CB, Cox NJ, Kuchta RD, Rowlen KL: Experimental Evaluation of the FluChip Diagnostic Microarray for Influenza Virus Surveillance. J Clin Microbiol 2006, 44:2863-2871.
Vialle A, Feau N, Allaire M, Didukh M, Martin F, Moncalvos JM, Hamelin RC: Evaluation of mitochondrial genes as DNA barcode
for basidiomycota. Mol Ecol Resources 2009, 9:99-113.
Buée M, Courty PE, Le Tacon F, Garbaye J: Écosystèmes forestiers: Diversité et fonction des champignons. Biofutur 2006,
268:42-45.
Frøslev TG, Jeppesen T, Læssøe T, Kjøller R: Molecular phylogenetics and delimitation of species in Cortinarius section Calochroi (Basidiomycota, Agaricales) in Europe. Mol Phylogenetics
Evol 2007, 44:217-227.
Smith ME, Douhan GW, Rizzo DM: Ectomycorrhizal community
structure in a xeric Quercus woodland based on rDNA
sequence analysis of sporocarps and pooled roots. New Phytol
2007, 174:847-863.
Tedersoo L, Kõljalg U, Hallenberg N, Larsson KH: Fine scale distribution of ectomycorrhizal fungi and roots across substrate
layers including coarse woody debris in a mixed forest. New
Phytol 2003, 159:153-165.
Prévost A, Pargney JC: Comparaison des ectomycorhizes
naturelles entre le hêtre (Fagus sylvatica) et 2 lactaires (Lactarius blennius var viridis et Lactarius subdulcis). I. Caractéristiques morphologiques et cytologiques. Ann Sci For 1995,
52:131-146.
Ranger J, Andreux J, Bienaimé SF, Berthelin J, Bonnaud P, Boudot JP,
Bréchet C, Buée M, Calmet JP, Chaussod R, Gelhaye D, Gelhaye L,
Gérard F, Jaffrain J, Lejon D, Le Tacon F, Léveque J, Maurice JP, Merlet
D, Moukoumi J, Munier-Lamy C, Nourrisson G, Pollier B, Ranjard L,
Simonsson M, Turpault MP, Vairelles D, Zeller B: Effet des substitutions d'essence sur le fonctionnement organo-minéral de
l'écosystème forestier, sur les communautés microbiennes
et sur la diversité des communautés fongiques mycorhiziennes et saprophytes (cas du dispositif expérimental de
Breuil-Morvan). In Proceedings of the Final Report of contract INRAGIP Ecofor 2001-24, no. INRA 1502A Champenoux: INRA BEF Nancy;
2004.
Agerer R: Colour atlas of ectomycorrhizae Munich: Einhorn-Verlag Eduard Dietenberger; 1987.
Courtecuisse R: Mushrooms of Britain and Europe London: Harper Collins; 2000.
Corpet F: Multiples sequence alignment with hierarchical
clustering. Nucl Acids Res 1988, 16:10881-10890.
Rinaldi C, Kohler A, Frey P, Duchaussoy F, Ningre N, Couloux A,
Wincker P, Le Thiec D, Fluch S, Martin F, Duplessis S: Transcript
profiling of poplar leaves upon infection with compatible and
incompatible strains of the foliar rust Melampsora larici-populina. Plant Physiol 2007, 144:347-366.
Huson DH, Auch AF, Qi J, Schuster SC: MEGAN Analysis of
Metagenomic Data. Genome Research 2007, 17:377-386.
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2180/9/241
Publish with Bio Med Central and every
scientist can read your work free of charge
"BioMed Central will be the most significant development for
disseminating the results of biomedical researc h in our lifetime."
Sir Paul Nurse, Cancer Research UK
Your research papers will be:
available free of charge to the entire biomedical community
peer reviewed and published immediately upon acceptance
cited in PubMed and archived on PubMed Central
yours — you keep the copyright
BioMedcentral
Submit your manuscript here:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/publishing_adv.asp
Page 11 of 11
(page number not for citation purposes)
71
Additional file 1: Rarefied species accumulation curve of fungal species
detected in ECM root tip samples of (A) spruce and (B) beech.
A
12
number of detected species
10
8
6
4
2
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
number of sequenced clones
B
14
number of detected species
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0
10
20
30
40
number of sequenced clones
50
60
Additional file 2: Species described by morphotyping with description of observed morphotype according to Agerer (1987-2001).
ECM fungal species
ECM from Picea abies
Cenococcum geophilum
Clavulina cristata
Cortinarius sp1
Inocybe sp
Lactarius sp 1
Piloderma sp
Sebacina sp
Thelephora terrestris
Tomentellopsis submollis
Tylospora asterophora
Tylospora fibrillosa
Xerocomus badius
Xerocomus pruinatus
Dark and shiny mycorrhizal mantle with adhering soil debris within hyphae
Monopodial mycorrhizae with velvet white mantle
Tortuous mycorrhizal tips with emanting hyphae and white rhizomorphs
Monopodial mycorrhizae, silvery and velvet mantle (cystidia) coated by soil particules
Pyramidal mycorrhizae, smooth mantle with laticifers
Branched mycorrhizae with cottony hyphae and few pale rhizomorphs on yellow-brown mantle
Monopodial mycorrhizae with pearly white mantle
Monopodial-pinnate mycorrhizal system, smooth yellow-brown mantle
Tortuous mycorrhizal tips with white emanting hyphae and pinkish rhizomorphs
Monopodial-pyramidal mycorrhizae, yellow-white smooth mantle and emanating hyphae
Pyramidal mycorrhizae, yellow-white smooth mantle and cottony hyphae
Branched mycorrhizae with rhizomorphs, shiny-yellow mantle (presence of air)
Monopodial-pyramidal mycorrhizae with rhizomorphs, white mantle (presence of air)
72
ECM from Fagus sylvatica
Amanita rubescens
Cenococcum geophilum
Cortinarius sp 2
Cortinarius sp 3
Inocybe napipes
Laccaria amethystina
Laccaria laccata
Lactarius sp 2
Pezizales sp
Russula puellaris
Sebacinaceae sp
Tomentella sp
Tomentellopsis submollis
Xerocomus pruinatus
Morphotyping
Monopodial mycorrhizae with velvety claret-coloured mantle
Dark and shiny mycorrhizal mantle with adhering soil debris within hyphae
Tortuous mycorrhizal tips with cottony hyphae
Tortuous mycorrhizal tips with emanting hyphae and white rhizomorphs
Irregulary pinnate mycorrhiza, emanating hyphae enveloping mycorrhizal system
Monopodial mycorrhiza with purple tips and velvet surface mantle (emanating hyphae)
Monopodial mycorrhiza with velvet honey-yellowish surface mantle
Pyramidal mycorrhiza, smooth honey-yellow mantle (laticiferous hyphae)
Dichotomous mycorrhizae with pale yellow mantle
Monopodial-pyramidal mycorrhizae, yellowish mantle with presence of air (light shiny)
Dichotomous mycorrhiza, smooth greenish mantle
Monopodial-pinnate mycorrhiza with grainy brown mantle (few emanating hyphae)
Dichotomous mycorrhizae with several pink rhizomorphs on white mantle (with air)
Monopodial-pyramidal mycorrhizae with rhizomorphs, silvery-white mantle (presence of air)
Additional file 3: Sequences of the 95 species-specific oligonucleotides.
Abbreviation Oligonucleotide Sequence (5’-3’)
Boletus aestivalis
Boletus calopus
Boletus edulis
Boletus erythropus
Strobilomyces strobilaceus
Xerocomus badius
Xerocomus chrysenteron
Xerocomus cisalpinus
Xerocomus communis
Xerocomus ferrugineus
Xerocomus pruinatus
Xerocomus subtomentosus
Paxillus involutus
Scleroderma citrinum
Scleroderma verrucosum
Suillus bovinus
Suillus luteus
Suillus variegatus
Lactarius camphorata
Lactarius chrysorrheus
Lactarius deterrimus
Lactarius hepaticus
Lactarius quietus
Lactarius subdulcis
Lactarius theiogalus
Russula betularum
Russula brunneviolacea
Russula cyanoxantha
Russula densifolia
Russula emetica
Russula grisea
Russula integra
Russula nigricans
Russula ochroleuca
Russula parazurea
BOLAES
BOLCAL
BOLEDU
BOLERY
STRMSTR
XERBAD
XERCHR
XERCIS
XERCOM
XERFER
XERPRU
XERSUB
PAXINV
SCLCIT
SCLVER
SUIBOV
SUILUT
SUIVAR
LACTCAM
LACTCHR
LACTDET
LACTHEP
LACTQUI
LACTSUB
LACTTHE
RUSBET
RUSBRU
RUSCYA
RUSDEN
RUSEME
RUSGRI
RUSINT
RUSNIG
RUSOCH
RUSPAR
GAGTGTCATGGAATTCTCAACCGTGTCCTCGATCTGATCTCGAGGCATGGCTTGGACTTGGGAGTTGCTG
TTGAGTGTCATCGAATTCTCAACCATGTCTCGATCTATTTCAAGGCATGGCTTGGAGTTGGGGGTTTGCT
CCTGAAATGCATTAGCGATGTTCAGCAAGCCTGAACGTGCACGGCCTTTTCGACGTGATAACGATCGTCG
TTGAGTGTCATTTGAATTCTCAACCATGTCTTGATTGATTTCGAGGCATGGCTTGGACTTGGGGGTTGCT
GCAAAGACGTCGGCTCTCCTCAAACGCATGAGCGGGACTAGCATGTCCGGACGTG
GAGGATCTATGTATTTCATCATCACACCTATCGTATGTCTAGAATGTCATCGTCGACCACTGGGCGGCGA
GTGCACGTCCACCTTTCTCTTACTCTCACACCTGTGCACACATTGTAGGTCCTCGAAAGAGGATCTATGT
GAAAGCGGTCGGCTCTCCTGAAATGCATTAGCAAAGGACAGCAAGTCTGACGTGCACGGCCTTGACG
GACGTGATAATGATCGTCGTGGGCTGAAGCGTCGGACATGCATCGATTGTCTTGTTTGCTTCCAAATCAC
CGTCCCCTCACCTTTTCTATCTACACACACCTGTGCACCTATTGTAGATCCCTCTCGAAAGAGAGGGAA
TTCGCTGTGCACGTCTTTCTTTTCGTCGACCTTTCTCTTACTCTCACACCTGTGCACACACTGTAGGT
CTTTCTTCTTTCTTGGATGGAAAGTATGGCTTGGAGTTGGGAGTTGCTGGCAGAGACTGTCAGCTCTCC
GCCTTTCCTTTGGAAGACCCTTTCTTCACACCCGTGCACACATTGTAGGTCTCCGCGAGGGGATCTATGT
GCATGTCTACAGAATGTCGTCCGTGGCGTCGGGCCACCGTAAACCATAATACAACTTTCAGCGATGGAT
GAGTGTCATCGAAACCTCAGACCGACCCTTCGACCCCGTCGGAGCTCGGTCTGGACTTGTGGGAGTCTGC
CAACTCCTCTCGATTGACTTCGAGTGGAGCTTGGATAGTGGGGGCTGCCGGAGACCTGAATATTCGTGTT
CGGAGACACTGGATTCGTCCAGGACTCGGGCTCCTCTTAAATGAATCGGCTCGCGGTCGACTTTCGACTT
GACCCGCGTCTTCATAAGCCCCTTCGTGTAGAAAGTCTATGAATGTTTTTACCATCATCGACTCGCGACT
CGCTGGCTTTCAACGTTGTTGCACGCCGGAGCGTGTCCTCTCACATAACACAATCCATCTCACCCTTTGT
CCTCTCACATAATAATCCATCTCACCCTTTGTGCACCACCGCGTGGGCACCCTTTGGGATC
CGCTGACTTTTTGAGACACAAAAGTCGTGCACGCCGGAGTGCGTCCTCTCACATAAAATCCATCTCACCC
GCAAGGGCTGTCGCTGACTCTATAAAGTCGTGCACGCCCGAGTGTGTCCTCTCACATAATAATCCATCTC
CTTCTAATCGTCTCAACCTTGCATCGAGACAAACGTCTGAGCGTGGCTCCCTTCCCTGGGAAACTCTCTC
GCTGTCGCTGACTCAAAGTCGTGCACGCCCGAGTGTGTCCTCTCACATAAATAATCCATCTCACCCTTTG
GTCGTGAAAACCTCAACCTCTTTGGTTTCTTCTGGGGACCAAAGCAGGCTTGGACTTTGGAGGCCTTTTG
GGTCATTTTCGACCGCGGAAAGGATTTTGGACTTGGAGGCCTTTTGCTGGTTTCACCTTGAAGCGAGCTC
CTTTTTCTTTGACGAGAAAAGGAGTTTTGGACTTGGAGGTTCAATGCCCGCTTTCGGCATCGAAAGCGAG
CTTCAACCTTTCTTGGTTTCTTGACCGAGGAAGGCTTGGACTTTGGGGGTCTTTCATTGCTGGCCTCTTT
GTCGTGAATTTCTCAAACCTTCTTGGTTTCTTGATCAAGAAGGCTTTGGACTTTGGAGGTCTTTGCCGGC
CTCCTCCCAAATGTATTAGTGGGGTCTGCATTGTCGGTCCTTGGCGTGATAAGTTGTTTCTACGTCTTGG
GTGCATCACCGCGTGGGGCCCTTCTCTTTTCGGAGAGGGGGGTTCACGTTTTTACAAGAACGAACCATTA
CCCTTTTTGTTTGAAAAGGATTTTTGGACTTGGAGGTTCCATGCTCGCCTTTGCTTTTGAAGGTGAGCTC
GTCGTGAAATTCTCAAACCTTCTTGGTTCCTTGACCAAGATGGCTTTGGACTTTGGAGGCGTTGTGCTGG
CCTTTTTCTTTTTGGGAAAGGGTTTTTGGACTTGGAGGCTTTTTGCTGGCTTCACCTTGAAGTGAGCTCC
CCTTGACGTGATAAGTTTGCTTCTACGTCTTGGGTTTCGCACTGTCGCACCGGAACCTGCTTCCAACCGT
73
Species
RUSPUE
RUSVIO
AMACIT
AMACRO
AMAMUS
AMAPAN
AMARUB
LACCAME
LACCBIC
LACCLAC
STRESC
TRIACE
TRICOL
TRIFUL
CCTTTTGTGCATCACCGCGTGGGTCCCCCTTTGCGGGAGGGCTCGCGTTTTCACATAAAACTTGATACAG
GCGTGGGCCACCTTCTTTGGCTTGTTTCAAAGAGGTCGGTTCACGTTTTTACACACACACACCTTTATG
AGGTCCTTATGCAGCATGCAGGGAACTTTTGGACATTGGGAGTTGCTGGTCACTGATAAAGTGGCTGGCT
CCTGTGCACCGCCTGTAGACACTCTGTGTCTATGATATATGTCACACACACACACACAGTTGTTTTAGGC
GTCAAAACATGCACTTGAGTGTGTTTTGGATTGTGGGAGTGTCTGCTGGCTTTATGAGCCAGCTCTCCTG
CCTGAAAGACATTAGCTTTGGAGGGATGTGCCAAGTCGCTTCTGCCTTTCCATTGGTGTGATAGACG
TGGGATTTTTGGACATTGGGAGTTGCCGGCTGCTGATAAAGTGGTGGGCTCTTCTGAAAAGCATTAGTTG
GGATACCTCTCGAGGCAACTCGGATTTTAGGGTCGCTGTGCTGTACAAGTCGGCTTTCCTTTCATTTCCA
GCTTGGTTAGGCTTGGATGTGGGGGTTGCGGGCTTCATTAATGAGGTCGGCTCTCCTTAAATGCATTAGC
GGATACCTCTCGAGGCAACTCGGATTTTAGGATCGCCGTGCTGCACAAGTCGGCTTTCCTTTCATTTCC
CTTTGTACTCTTGTTGCTGTGTGCTGGCTTCTTCGGAAGTATGGTGCACGCTTGAGTGCAAGGGTCTTC
AACCTTACTCAGCTTTCGCTAGTCGAGTTAGGCTTGGATATGGGAGTTTGTGGGCTTCTCGAAGTCGGCT
CACTTTTATCGGTTGAATTAGGCTTGGATGTGGGAGTCTTTGCTGGCTTCGCAAGAGGTTGGCTCTCCTT
CTACGCCATCATGTGAAGCAGCTTTAAATTGGGGTTGCTGCTCTCTAACAGTCTCTTTGGTGGGACAATT
TRIPOP
TRISAP
TRISCI
TRIUST
CORALB
CORANO
CORBOL
CORCIN
CORDEC
CORDELI
COREVE
CORHEM
CORHIN
CORMUL
CORPRI
CORSAN
CORSP1
CORSP2
CORSP3
CORSEM
CORTOR
CORTRA
CORVUL
HEBRAD
CCTAAAGTCGATCAGGCTTGGATGTGGGAGTTTGCGGGCTTTTCTAAAGTCGGCTCTCCTTAAATTT
CCTTTTCAGCATTTATGTTGATCAGGCTTGGATGTGGGAGTTTGCGGGCTTCTCAGAAGTCGGCTCTCCT
GACTTGGAATATCTCTAGAGGCAACTCGGTTTTGAGGATTGCTGTGCGCAAGCCAACTTTCCTTACAC
CCTTTTCGGCTTTTTCTAAGTCGATTTAGGCTTGGATGTGGGAGTTTGCGGGCTTCTCTGAAGTCGGCTC
CCTTCTCATTGCTGAGTGGTTTGGATGTGGGGGTTTGCTGGCCTCTTAAATGAGTTCAGCTCTCCTGAA
CTTCAGCTTTTGCTTGTTGAGTGTTGGATGTGGGGGGTCTTTTGCTGGCCTTTTTTTAGAGGTCAGCTTC
CTCCACCTGTGCACCTTTTGTAGACCTGAATAGCTTTCTGAATGCTAAGCATTCAGGCTTGAGGATTGAC
CCAGGGTTTTTGACTTGTCGAGTGTTTGGATGTGGGGGTCTTTTGCTGGTCTCTTTTGAGGTCGGCTCCC
GGGTTTGCTGGCCTTTTAAAAGGTTCAGCTCCTCTGAAATGCATTAGCAGAACAACCTTGCTCATTGGTG
GAACAATTTGTTGACTGTTCATTGGTGTGATAATTATCTGCGCTATTGAACTGTGAGGCAAGTTCAGCTTC
CTCCACCTGTGCACCCTTTGTAGACCTCCCAGGTCTATGTTGCTTCTTCATTTACCCCAATGTATGT
CAAACCTTCTCTTTGTTGAGCGGTTTTGGATGTGGGGGTTTGCTGGCCTCTTAAAAAGGTTCAGCTCCTC
CTAGGGAGCATGTGCACACCTTGTCATCTTTATATCTCCACCTGTGCACTTCTTGTAGGCCTTTCAGGT
CTCCACCTGTGCACCTTTTGTAGACCTGGATATCTCTCTGAGTGCTTGCGCTCAGGTTTGAGGATTGATT
CTTCTCATTGCTGAGTGGTTTGGATGTGGTGGTTTGCTGGCCTCTTAAATGAGTTCAGCTCTCCTGAATG
CCTGTGCACCTTTTGTAGATCTGGATATCTTTCTGAATGCCTGGCATTCAGGTTTGGGGATTGACTTTGC
GGGAGCATGTGCACGCCTTGTCATCTTTATATCTCCACCTGTGCACCTTTTGTAGACCCTTTCCAGGTCT
CCTGATGGGTTGTTGCTGGTTCTCTGGGAGCATGTGCACACCTGTCATCTTTATATCTCCACCTGTGCAC
GGGAGCATGTGCACGCCTGTCATCTTTATATCTCCACCTGTGCACTTTTGTAGACCTTCTGGGTCTATGT
CTGGTCTCTTTTGAGATCGGCTCCCCTGAAATGCATTAGCGGAACAATTTGTTGACCCGTTCATTGGTG
GCATGTGCACACCTGTCATCTTTATATCTCCACCTGTGCACCCTTTGTAGACCTTCTCAGGTCTATGTTG
CAACCTTCTCTTGTTTGAGTGGTTTGGATGTGGGGGTTTGCTGGCTTCTTAAAAGGGTTCAGCTCCTCTG
CAACCTCTTCAGCTTTTGCTTGTTGAGCGTTGGATGTGGGGGGTCTGTTTTGCTGGTCTTCTCAGGTCAG
GCTTTTGTTGATACTGGCTTGGATATGGGGGTCTATTTTGCTGGCTTCTTTACAGATGGTCAGCTCCCC
74
Russula puellaris
Russula violeipes
Amanita citrina
Amanita crocea
Amanita muscaria
Amanita pantherina
Amanita rubescens
Laccaria amethystina
Laccaria bicolor
Laccaria laccata
Strobilurus esculentus
Tricholoma acerbum
Tricholoma columbetta
Tricholoma fulvum/
pseudonictitans
Tricholoma populinum
Tricholoma saponaceum
Tricholoma sciodes
Tricholoma ustale
Cortinarius alboviolaceus
Cortinarius anomalus
Cortinarius bolaris
Cortinarius cinnamomeus
Cortinarius decipiens
Cortinarius delibutus
Cortinarius evernius
Cortinarius hemitrichus
Cortinarius hinnuleus
Cortinarius multiformis
Cortinarius privignus
Cortinarius sanguineus
Cortinarius sp 1
Cortinarius sp 2
Cortinarius sp 2
Cortinarius semisanguineus
Cortinarius tortuosus
Cortinarius traganus
Cortinarius vulpinus
Hebeloma radicosum
HEBSAC
ISOGRI
INONAP
INOSP
THEPEN
THETER
TOMSUB
TOMPSUBM
CANTUB
CLACRI
HYDREP
CLAVPIS
RAMABI
TYLAST
TYLFIB
CENGEO
ENTCOL
GIGMAR
GLOSIN
PAROCC
SCUHET
ARATHA
CAGCTTTTGTTGATAACGGCTTGGATATGGGGGTTTTTTTTTGCTGGCTTCTTCACAGATGGTCAGCTCC
GCTGTCCCTTCCTTTGGGTACGTGCACGCTTGTCATCTTTATTTCTACCCACTGTGCACATATTGTAGAC
CTGCTGGCTCTCCTCGGAGGGCATGTGCACGCTTGTTGTCCATTATTTCTCCCACTGTGCACAAATTGTA
GGCACGTGCACGCCTGTTTTTATTTGCTTCTCCAACTGTGCACAAATATCGTAGACCTTAGCAAGGCCTA
AAATGAATCAGCTTGCCAGTCTTTGGTGGCATCACAGGTGTGATAACTATCTACGCTTGTGGTGGTC
CTCTGTAGTTCTATGGTCTGGGGGACCCTGTCTTCCTTCTGTGGTTCTACGTCTTTACACACACACTGTA
CTGGGGGACCCTGTCTTCCTGCCGTGGTTCTACGTCTTTACACACACTCTGTAATAAAGTCTTATGGAA
GATCACGGAGCCCTGATGGGCAACGAATGCCCTCGTCTATGAATATTTTCACACACGCTCAAAGTATGAC
CGGTCGCTTCCAATTGGGGGTTGACTCATAGGGGGTACATCTGTTTGAGGGTCATTTGTACCTTCTCAAA
CACCTGTGCACATTTTTGAGGGAGTCTTGAGTTGGTTGCCGCTCTTGGGTGATTTTCTCACATTCCCTTA
GGTATTCCGGGGAGCACACCTGTTCGAGTGTCATTGAAACTCTCAAATAAAGGTGGTTTTTGCAGACCAT
GAGGAGCATGCCTGTTTGAGTGTCGTGAATCTCTCTCAATCCCACCTCTGTGGGCTTGGATTTGGATG
GCATTAGCGTTCCGCCGCGAGTTCGGTTTCGTAACGACGGTGTGATAAGTAACACTTTGACGCCGTCTGG
CCGAGCCCTTGAATCCCAAACACCACATGTGAACCCACCGTAGGCCTTCGGGCCTATGTCTTATCATATA
CCCCCAACAAACACCGTGGGCCTTCGGGCCCGCGTATATTTACTCTGAATGTGTATAGAATGTAAACC
GACGATTGACTCATGTTGCCTCGGCGGGCTCGCCCGCCAGAGGATACATCAAAAATCTTGTTTTAACGGT
TGATCACCTCGCCGTCGATAGCTTTGCTAACCTCGGTGGGATCTGATTAACTAGAGATTAGACTGATCGT
CCTTGATAGATGTGATGTTTGGGGTCGAGGATTGCAACGGATACCCCTTCGGGGCTAGCCGCCTGATCT
CGTGGTGTTGCTTTTGTGACGCTTCGGAATTGGGTCATCTTGATCCTTTGGGTTAAGAGACT
CACAAGTCCTCTGGAACGTGGCATCGTAGAGGGTGAGAATCCCGTCTCTGGTCGTTGTCTTGCAGGCA
GTCAGCGTCGATTTTGGATATCATAAAATGATTGGGGGGAAGGTAGCTCCTTCGGGAGTGTTATAGCCCT
AGCTTTTATCTCGGTCTTGTCGTGCGCGTTGCTTCCGGATATCACAAAACCCCGGCACGAAAAGTGTCA
75
Hebeloma sacchariolens
Inocybe griseolilacina
Inocybe napipes
Inocybe sp
Thelephora penicillata
Thelephora terrestris
Tomentella sublilacina
Tomentellopsis submollis
Cantharellus tubaeformis
Clavulina cristata
Hydnum repandum
Clavariadelphus pistillaris
Ramaria abietina
Tylospora asterophora
Tylospora fibrillosa
Cenococcum geophilum
Enthrospora colombiana
Gigaspora margarita
Glomus sinuosum
Paraglomus occultum
Scutellospora heterogama
Arabidopsis thaliana
76
77
4. Chapter III: Diagnostic ribosomal ITS phylochip for
identification of host influence on ectomycorrhizal communities
Marlis Reich, Marc Buée, Henrik Nilsson, Benoit Hilseberger, Annegret Kohler, Emilie
Tisserant, Francis Martin
(in preparation for submission to New Phytologist)
78
79
5. Chapter IV: 454 pyrosequencing analyses of forest soil reveal
an unexpected high fungal
Buée M*, Reich M*, Murat C, Morin E, Nilsson RH, Uroz S, Martin F
* These authors contributed equally to this work.
(published in New Phytologist (2009) 184: 449-456)
New
Phytologist
Research
80
454 Pyrosequencing analyses of forest soils reveal an
unexpectedly high fungal diversity
M. Buée1*, M. Reich1*, C. Murat1, E. Morin1, R. H. Nilsson2, S. Uroz1 and F. Martin1
1
INRA, UMR 1136 INRA ⁄ Nancy Université Interactions Arbres ⁄ Microorganismes, INRA-Nancy, 54280 Champenoux, France; 2Department of Plant
and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenborg, Box 461, 405 30 Gothenborg, Sweden
Summary
Author for correspondence:
Marc Buée
Tel: +33 383 39 40 72
Email: buee@nancy.inra.fr
Received: 27 May 2009
Accepted: 14 July 2009
New Phytologist (2009) 184: 449–456
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03003.x
Key words: 454 pyrosequencing, community
structure, ectomycorrhizal fungi,
environmental samples, fungal diversity,
nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed
spacers.
• Soil fungi play a major role in ecological and biogeochemical processes in forests. Little is known, however, about the structure and richness of different fungal
communities and the distribution of functional ecological groups (pathogens, saprobes and symbionts).
• Here, we assessed the fungal diversity in six different forest soils using tagencoded 454 pyrosequencing of the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer1 (ITS-1). No less than 166 350 ITS reads were obtained from all samples. In each
forest soil sample (4 g), approximately 30 000 reads were recovered, corresponding to around 1000 molecular operational taxonomic units.
• Most operational taxonomic units (81%) belonged to the Dikarya subkingdom
(Ascomycota and Basidiomycota). Richness, abundance and taxonomic analyses
identified the Agaricomycetes as the dominant fungal class. The ITS-1 sequences
(73%) analysed corresponded to only 26 taxa. The most abundant operational
taxonomic units showed the highest sequence similarity to Ceratobasidium sp.,
Cryptococcus podzolicus, Lactarius sp. and Scleroderma sp.
• This study validates the effectiveness of high-throughput 454 sequencing technology for the survey of soil fungal diversity. The large proportion of unidentified
sequences, however, calls for curated sequence databases. The use of pyrosequencing on soil samples will accelerate the study of the spatiotemporal dynamics
of fungal communities in forest ecosystems.
Introduction
Fungi represent an essential functional component of terrestrial ecosystems as decomposers, mutualists and pathogens,
and are one of the most diverse groups of the Eukarya (Mueller et al., 2007). Studying the ecological factors that
underlie the dynamics of fungal communities remains a
challenge because of this high taxonomic and ecological
diversity. PCR-based molecular methods and sequencing of
ribosomal DNA have been used successfully to identify subsets of this species’ richness (Vandenkoornhuyse et al.,
2002), and have provided insights into the ecological processes that affect the structure and diversity of fungal communities (Gomes et al., 2003; Schadt et al., 2003; Artz
et al., 2007). These advances are particularly noteworthy in
*These authors contributed equally to this work.
The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation New Phytologist (2009)
below-ground studies of ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungi as a
result of the combination of morphological and molecular
identifications of EM root tips (Horton & Bruns, 2001;
Martin & Slater, 2007). Spatial and temporal variations of
fungal communities in forest soils are affected by numerous
biotic and abiotic factors, including seasons, soil characteristics, stand age and host tree species (Nordén & Paltto,
2001; Peter et al., 2001; Dickie et al., 2002; Buée et al.,
2005; Genney et al., 2005; Koide et al., 2007; Tedersoo
et al., 2008).
The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region is now
widely used as a validated DNA barcode marker for the identification of many fungal species (Seifert, 2008). With
improvements in sequencing techniques and dedicated
DNA databases (Kõljalg et al., 2005), recent studies
have demonstrated the potential of large-scale Sanger
sequencing of ITS for quantifying and characterizing
New Phytologist (2009) 184: 449–456 449
www.newphytologist.org
New
Phytologist
81
450 Research
soil fungal diversity (O’Brien et al., 2005). To our knowledge, the species’ richness of communities of soil fungi
has not yet been assessed using high-throughput pyrosequencing.
In this article, we present the use of high-throughput tagencoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (Acosta-Martinez
et al., 2008) to assess the fungal diversity in six soil samples
from a French temperate forest site. We show that the
abundance and diversity of fungi in the six soil samples were
much higher than hypothesized previously. A few fungal
taxa account for most of the species’ abundance, whereas
the majority of species are only rarely retrieved. There is reason to believe that the spatial diversity and difference in
fungal richness among the six soil samples could be
explained partly by forest management, that is, plantation
tree species. The use of pyrosequencing on soil samples will
accelerate the study of the spatiotemporal dynamics of fungal communities in forest ecosystems.
Materials and Methods
Study site and sampling
The experimental site of Breuil-Chenue forest is situated
in the Morvan Mountains, Burgundy, France (latitude
4718¢10¢¢, longitude 44¢44¢¢). The elevation is 640 m,
the annual rainfall is 1280 mm and the mean annual temperature is 9C. The parent rock is granite and the soil is
an alocrisol, with a pH ranging between 4 and 4.5 (Ranger
et al., 2004). The native forest is an old coppice composed
of beech (Fagus sylvatica L., 90% of the stems), Durmast
oak (Quercus sessiliflora Smith), sporadic weeping birch
(Betula verrucosa Ehrh) and hazel trees (Corylus avellana
L.). In 1976, a part of the native forest was clear-cut and
this area was planted with the following six species: beech
(Fagus sylvatica L.), Durmast oak (Quercus sessiliflora
Smith), Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst), Douglas fir
(Pseudotsuga menziesii Franco), Corsican pine (Pinus nigra
Arn. ssp. laricio Poiret var. Corsicana) and Nordmann fir
(Abies nordmanniana Spach.). Six plots (1000 m2 each),
corresponding to these six plantations, were selected for
the study. These plots were relatively contiguous, because
the six plantations were distributed on a total area of c.
14 000 m2. The site is surrounded mainly by native forest
and Douglas fir plantations. In March 2008, eight soil
cores (1 · 1 · 5 cm depth) were sampled independently
along two 30 m transects in each of these six plots. After
removal of the forest litter, the 48 soil cores were sampled
in the organic horizon (depth, 0–5 cm) and transported to
the laboratory in an ice chest (8C). Soil cores from each
plot were independently homogenized, and minor woody
debris and roots (>2 mm) were eliminated. Finally,
500 mg of the remaining soil was subsampled for DNA
extraction from each soil core.
New Phytologist (2009) 184: 449–456
www.newphytologist.org
DNA extraction, PCR and pyrosequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted from the 48 subsamples of
soil using the ‘FastDNA SPIN for Soil Kit’ (MP Biomedicals, Illkirch, France), according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. Amplicon libraries were performed using a
combination of tagged primers designed for the variable
ITS-1 region, as recommended for the tag-encoded 454
GS-FLX amplicon pyrosequencing method (AcostaMartinez et al., 2008). The 48 genomic DNA samples were
diluted to 1 : 5 and 1 : 100. These 96 diluted genomic
DNA samples were amplified separately using the fungal
primer pair ITS1F (5¢-AxxxCTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3¢) and ITS2 (5¢-BGCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3¢) to generate PCR ITS rRNA fragments of c.
400 bp, where A and B represent the two pyrosequencing
primers (GCCTCCCTCGCGCCATCAG and GCCTTG
CCAGCCCGCTCAG) and xxx was designed for the
sample identification barcoding key. The PCR conditions
used were 94C for 4 min, 30 cycles of 30 s at 94C (denaturation), 50C for 1 min (annealing) and 72C for 90 s
(extension), followed by 10 min at 72C. The 96 PCR
products were purified using the Multiscreen-PCR plate
system (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA), and
then pooled to obtain six amplicon libraries corresponding
to the six different forest soils. The amplicon length and
concentration were estimated, and an equimolar mix of all
six amplicon libraries was used for pyrosequencing. Pyrosequencing of the six amplicon libraries (from the ITS1F
primer) on the Genome Sequencer FLX 454 System (454
Life Sciences ⁄ Roche Applied Biosystems, Nutley, NJ, USA)
at Cogenics (Meylan, France) resulted in 180 200 reads
that satisfied the sequence quality criteria employed (cf.
Droege & Hill, 2008). Tags were extracted from the
FLX-generated composite FASTA file into individual
sample-specific files based on the tag sequence by the
proprietary software COGENICS v.1.14 (Cogenics Genome
Express FLX platform, Grenoble, France).
Sequence editing and analysis of the reads by
operational taxonomic unit (OTU) clustering
The filtered sequences were trimmed using the trimseq
script from the EMBOSS package (Rice et al., 2000).
Sequences shorter than 100 bp after quality trimming were
not considered. The average length of the 166 350 edited
reads was 252 bp. The resultant individual sample FASTA
files were assembled in tentative consensus sequences using
BLASTclust v.2.2.1.6 (Altschul et al., 1997), with the requirement that at least 97% similarity be obtained over at least
90% of the sequence length (-S 97 -L 0.9). In order to
identify OTUs, a random sequence was compared with the
nonredundant GenBank database and a custom-curated
database (C-DB, described below). The OTUs defined at
The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation New Phytologist (2009)
New
Phytologist
97% sequence similarity (O’Brien et al., 2005) were used to
perform rarefaction analysis and to calculate the richness
(Shannon) and diversity (Chao1) indices. The rarefaction
analysis was performed using ANALYTIC RAREFACTION v.1.4
(Hunt Mountain Software, Department of Geology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA). Calculation of the
richness (Shannon) and diversity (Chao1) indices was performed using the ESTIMATES software package (version
8.00, R. K. Colwell; http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/ Estimate
SPages ⁄ Est-SUsersGuide ⁄ EstimateSUsersGuide.htm).
Phylogenetic assignment of the ITS-1 reads with
MEGAN
In a second analysis, the individual sample FASTA files were
evaluated using NCBI-BLASTn (Altschul et al., 1997) against
the nonredundant GenBank database (Benson et al., 2008)
and C-DB derived from the GenBank and UNITE (Kõljalg
et al., 2005; http://unite.ut.ee/index.php) databases. To
construct C-DB, all fully identified fungal ITS sequences in
GenBank and UNITE, as of November 2007, were
screened for appropriate length (300–1500 bp), IUPAD
DNA ambiguity content (less than five symbols) and taxonomic reliability, as established by Nilsson et al. (2006). A
maximum of five sequences per species was selected at random, resulting in a total of 23 390 sequences representing
9678 Latin binomials. A post-processing Perl script generated best-hit files comprising the top 10 best BLAST hits with
an E-value < 10e)3 for tentative species’ identification.
According to their best matches, the rDNA ITS
sequences were phylogenetically assigned using MEGAN v.
3.0.2 (MEtaGenome ANalyzer, Center for Bioinformatics,
Tübingen, Germany) (Huson et al., 2007), which provides
unique names and IDs for over 350 000 taxa from the
NCBI taxonomic database. The output files obtained from
the nonredundant GenBank and C-DB databases were then
processed. All parameters of MEGAN, including the lowest
common ancestor (LCA) assignment, were kept at default
values, except for the ‘min support’ option (regulating the
minimum number of sequence reads that must be assigned
to a taxon), which was set to either unity or five depending
on the analysis (cf. Wu & Eisen, 2008).
Results
Analysis of the reads by OTU clustering
A total of 166 350 ITS-1 sequences passed the quality control, and the number of reads per sample (i.e. pools of eight
soil cores per plantation) ranged from 25 700 to 35 600. A
maximum of 1000 OTUs (including 594 singletons) was
identified in the soil samples collected in the oak plantation
of the experimental site, whereas only 590 OTUs (including
333 singletons) were identified in the same volume of soil
The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation New Phytologist (2009)
82
Research
collected in the beech plantation. From 4 g of forest soil
and a mean of 30 000 reads, the number of OTUs obtained
was c. 830 (± 73). The number of OTUs increased with the
number of reads, and a plot of OTUs vs the number of
ITS-1 sequences resulted in rarefaction curves that did not
approach a plateau (Fig. 1), in spite of the large number of
reads. At 97% similarity, the nonparametric Chao1 estimator (Chao et al., 2005) predicted that the maximum number of OTUs probably ranges from 1350 to 3400 (data not
shown) depending on soil sample, with a mean estimated
OTU richness close to 2240 (± 360).
To identify the most frequent fungal taxa present in the
organic soils from the Breuil-Chenue forest site, OTUs
were clustered with all the 166 350 reads. The 26 most
abundant OTUs represented 73% of the total reads
(Table 1). The most frequent OTU was assigned to an
‘uncultured fungus’ in GenBank, but Menkis et al. (2006)
suggested that it corresponds to the root plant pathogen
Ceratobasidium sp. The six most abundant OTUs were distributed in three phyla and six distinct orders: Cantharellales, Mortierellales, Helotiales, Tremellales, Agaricales and
Boletales (Table 1).
Analysis of reads with MEGAN
The set of individual DNA reads was also compared against
the nonredundant GenBank database of known ITS
sequences using BLASTn. MEGAN was used to compute the
taxonomic content of the dataset, employing NCBI taxonomy to order and cluster the results (Huson et al., 2007).
Most of the sequences (71.5%) lack an explicit taxonomic
annotation (Fig. 2a). To obtain a better assessment of the
taxonomic diversity of the known species, sequences were
queried against C-DB, containing only ITS sequences from
known fungal species (see Materials and Methods section).
After this curation, only 11% of the OTUs remained in the
‘unclassified fungi’ category, 81% in the Dikarya subkingdom and 8% in the Mortierellaceae family (Fig. 2b). With
43.7% of the remaining ITS sequences, the Basidiomycota
represented the predominant fungal phylum in the pooled
results from soils of the Breuil-Chenue plantations.
Comparative analysis of the six plantation soil samples
revealed a distinct distribution of fungal phyla (Fig. 3). For
instance, Basidiomycota accounted for 65% of OTUs in
the soil cores collected in the oak plot, whereas this phylum
accounted for only 28% of OTUs in the soil cores sampled
in the spruce plot. Alternatively, soil samples from the
spruce plot were characterized by a relatively high percentage (c. 17%) of species from the order Mortierellales, parasitic or saprobic fungi belonging to the Mucoromycotina
(Hibbett et al., 2007), with the number of ITS reads twoto five-fold higher than the five other forest soil samples
(only 3% of Mortierellales in the soil cores from the oak
plantation).
New Phytologist (2009) 184: 449–456
www.newphytologist.org
451
New
Phytologist
83
452 Research
Fig. 1 Rarefaction curves depicting the
effect of internal transcribed spacer (ITS)
sequence number on the number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) identified from
the six soil samples. Between 25 680 and
35 600 sequences, depending on soil core,
were generated, corresponding to 580–1000
OTUs (at 3% sequence dissimilarity). Forest
soil (x, number of sequences; y, number of
observed OTUs): oak forest soil (32330;
1001); Douglas fir forest soil (23624; 704);
Norway spruce forest soil (32555; 983);
Corsican pine forest soil (26908; 833);
Nordmann fir forest soil (27054; 833); beech
forest soil (23878; 581).
Closest NCBI database match
Uncultured fungus (Ceratobasidium sp.)1
Uncultured Cryptococcus
Lactarius spp.2
(quietus, tabidus and Lactarius spp.)
Scleroderma sp. (citrinum)
Uncultured Dermateaceae
Uncultured Mortierellaceae
Uncultured fungus sp. 2
Uncultured soil fungus sp. 1
Inocybe sp. (uncultured ectomycorrhiza)
Russula sp. (parazurea)
Uncultured soil fungus sp. 2
Uncultured cryptococcus
Uncultured fungus (Cyllamyces sp.)
Uncultured soil fungus sp. 3
Uncultured Sebacinales
Uncultured basidiomycete
Uncultured soil fungus sp. 4 (Mortierellaceae)
Uncultured dothideomycete
(Cenococcum sp.)
Uncultured Helotiales
Tylospora asterophora
Uncultured basidiomycete
(Cortinarius sp.)
Amanita sp. (spissa)
Pseudotomentella sp. (tristis)
Uncultured Helotiales
Uncultured soil fungus sp. 5
(Mortierellaceae)
Boletus sp. (pruinatus)
Closest accession Identities,
length (%)
number (NCBI)
DQ093748.1
FM866335.1
EF493299.1
No. 454
reads
Table 1 List of the 26 most abundant fungal
operational taxonomic units (OTUs) found in
the forest soil of the Breuil-Chenue site
189 ⁄ 190 (99) 20067
222 ⁄ 222 (100) 19452
212 ⁄ 214 (99) 11302
EU784414.1
FJ554441.1
FJ475737.1
EF521220.1
EU806458.1
FN393147.1
DQ422007.1
DQ421207.1
FJ554344.1
AM260910.1
FJ553866.1
DQ421200.1
FJ475793.1
FJ554362.1
DQ273316.1
274 ⁄ 285 (96)
258 ⁄ 268 (96)
259 ⁄ 268 (96)
217 ⁄ 282 (76)
189 ⁄ 203 (93)
228 ⁄ 235 (97)
251 ⁄ 271 (92)
219 ⁄ 227 (96)
257 ⁄ 260 (98)
82 ⁄ 85 (96)
259 ⁄ 262 (98)
245 ⁄ 297 (82)
275 ⁄ 285 (96)
122 ⁄ 126 (96)
246 ⁄ 258 (95)
8733
5617
5253
5099
4562
4476
4390
4271
4041
3759
3403
2936
2703
2087
1443
FJ552732.1
AF052557.1
AM902090.1
272 ⁄ 281 (96)
269 ⁄ 276 (97)
231 ⁄ 248 (93)
1370
1220
1184
AJ889924.1
AJ889968.1
FJ475783.1
EU807054.1
237 ⁄ 242 (97)
232 ⁄ 237 (97)
239 ⁄ 264 (90)
249 ⁄ 253 (98)
1049
1048
1016
989
AJ889931.1
239 ⁄ 244 (97)
974
The 166 350 reads were assembled into tentative consensus sequences with the requirement
that at least 97% similarity be obtained over at least 90% of the sequence length (-S 97 -L
0.9). To identify OTUs, a random sequence was compared with the nonredundant GenBank
database.
1
This OTU was assigned to ‘Uncultured fungus’ in GenBank. It corresponds to
Ceratobasidium sp. (Menkis et al., 2006).
2
The 11 302 reads of this OTU (Lactarius spp.) correspond to a complex of 6952 reads of
L. quietus, 3489 reads of L. tabidus and 757 reads of other Lactarius species (as
L. theiogalus and L. rufus) with ITS-1 sequences showing >97% homology.
New Phytologist (2009) 184: 449–456
www.newphytologist.org
The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation New Phytologist (2009)
New
Phytologist
(a)
(b)
Fig. 2 Proportional distribution of different phyla and fungal groups
in the sequenced internal transcribed spacer (ITS) clone libraries. The
half-plate pyrosequencing produced 180 213 fungal sequences
(166 350 after trimming procedures). Results obtained after BLASTn of
sequences performed against GenBank and UNITE (a) or filtered
database (b) (16 987 sequences, representing 9 678 fungal species),
containing well-identified sequences and excluding all ‘uncultured
fungi’ sequences and ‘environmental sample’ sequences (see Materials and Methods section for more details). Taxonomic clustering was
performed in MEGAN (Metagenome Analysis) with the following lowest common ancestor (LCA) parameter values: 1, 35, 10 and 0 for
Min support, Min score, Top percent and Win score, respectively.
At the family and genus levels, the fungal communities
showed similar taxonomic distribution across all soil
samples (Tables S1 and S2). Among saprotrophic, parasitic
84
Research
and mycorrhizal fungi, the genera Ceratobasidium, Cryptococcus, Lactarius, Mortierella, Russula, Scleroderma, Neofabraea, Inocybe and Cenococcum were the most prominent
genera found in this study (Table 1). Moreover, numerous
Agaromycotina families were common to all soil samples,
with a strong representation of the EM species from the
Boletales, Agaricales, Thelephorales, Russulales, Cantharellales and Sebacinales (according to Rinaldi et al., 2008).
Other EM genera, such as Lactarius and Tylospora, were
mainly identified in the oak and spruce plots, respectively.
EM fungi represented more than 50% of the 30 most abundant genera (Table S1).
At the species’ level, the fungal community composition
also revealed similar taxa between different soils (Table S2).
The two yeast species, Cryptococcus podzolicus and C. terricola, occurring on the surface of roots and in the
rhizosphere (Golubtsova et al., 2006), were the most abundant Dikarya found in all organic forest soils of the
Breuil-Chenue site. The plant pathogen fungus Ceratobasidium sp. was also dominant in all soil samples. EM species,
such as Cenococcum geophilum and Cortinarius sp. (saturninus from C-DB), were also ubiquitous. Other species, such
as Scleroderma sp. (citrinum or bovista), were very abundant
in most plantations (between 1000 and 2000 reads), except
under oak (c. 100 reads). By contrast, the oak-specific EM
symbiont Lactarius quietus was restricted to the soil
collected under the oak plantation. Russula puellaris was
only identified in the Douglas fir forest soil samples and
Corsican pine plantation soil samples, whereas Russula vesca
was found in the soils from Corsican pine and Nordmann
fir plots.
Discussion
This pilot study used 454 pyrosequencing to evaluate the
fungal diversity in six distinct and spatially distant soil samples from a temperate forest. By sequencing a total of
166 350 PCR-amplified ITS-1 sequences, we identified
Fig. 3 Relative abundance of fungal phyla
for each soil library. ITS-1 sequences were
classified according to their BLASTn similarity
by MEGAN (Metagenome Analysis). After
using BLASTn against the curated database,
taxonomic clustering was performed in MEGAN
with the lowest common ancestor (LCA)
parameter values set to 5, 35, 10 and 0 for
Min support, Min score, Top percent and
Win score, respectively.
The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation New Phytologist (2009)
New Phytologist (2009) 184: 449–456
www.newphytologist.org
453
85
454 Research
600–1000 OTUs in each of the forest soil samples. The
nonparametric Chao1 estimator (Chao et al., 2005) predicted that the mean number of OTUs in 4 g of forest soil
was c. 2240 (± 360). Interestingly, 73% of the DNA reads
corresponded to 26 taxa only, and a detailed analysis
showed that the three most abundant OTUs were supported by 25–55% of reads whatever soil was considered.
Using a cloning ⁄ Sanger sequencing approach, Fierer et al.
(2007) have estimated a similar number of OTUs in rainforest soil samples (1 g), ranging between 1000 and 2000
OTUs in each community, depending on the parametric
model used. Although we found 600–1000 OTUs in each
of the forest soil samples, we highlighted between 249 and
408 taxonomic groups from these soil samples, supported
by a minimum of two reads. Therefore, the number of singletons, which were close to only 1.8% of the total number
of reads, corresponded to approximately 60% of the
observed OTUs. This large proportion of OTUs, supported
by unique reads, suggests that these sequences result from
the sequencing of the numerous individuals isolated in the
samples. This low abundance of numerous fungal taxa
should be correlated with the inconspicuous nature of fungi
and their dispersal ability. Hyphae and spores present in litter, leaves, pollen or needles, or the microscopic propagules,
probably favour the spread of fungal species in diverse ecosystems. These species constitute a microbial reservoir (Finlay, 2002), which may play important functions in forest
ecosystems facing environmental stresses.
At the present time, the ITS regions have been validated
as the best DNA barcode marker for fungal species’ identification (Seifert, 2008). In the present pyrosequencing experiment, and as reported in other studies (Liu et al., 2008;
Nilsson et al., 2009), an average length of 252 bp for the
ITS-1 sequences is long and sufficiently polymorphic to
allow the identification of the majority of fungal OTUs at
the species’ or genus levels. A large part of the sequenced
ITS regions belonged to unclassified fungi from incompletely annotated environmental samples. Lack of taxonomic annotation and errors in taxonomic assignments of
ITS sequences deposited in the international DNA databases (Vilgalys, 2003) are major limitations to the survey of
fungal species, and have hampered such efforts (Nilsson
et al., 2006; Bidartondo et al., 2008; Horton et al., 2009).
For these reasons, the use of a curated ITS database (Nilsson
et al., 2005, 2006) should provide more pertinent taxonomic information. Using a curated database, we found
that the majority of fungal sequences recovered belonged to
the Dikarya (Ascomycota and Basidiomycota), which
account for 81% of the OTUs. Basidiomycota was the most
abundant phylum (43.7% of OTUs), whereas Ascomycota
accounted for a much smaller percentage of the community
(17.3%). These results are very similar to those of a largescale survey of temperate forest soils carried out using Sanger sequencing (O’Brien et al., 2005). By contrast, Schadt
New Phytologist (2009) 184: 449–456
www.newphytologist.org
New
Phytologist
et al. (2003) found a large proportion of Ascomycota in
125 cloned fungal sequences from tundra soils. The Glomeromycota and Chytridiomycota were probably underestimated in our ITS-1 libraries as we have amplified ITS from
soil DNA using primers designed for Dikarya (ITS1F ⁄ ITS-2). In addition, these fungal taxa and several genera, including Glomeromycota, were underestimated in our
survey, as poorly annotated ITS sequences from GenBank
were excluded from C-DB (Vilgalys, 2003; Nilsson et al.,
2008; Ryberg et al., 2009).
Lindahl et al. (2007) reported that saprotrophic fungi
were confined to the surface of the boreal forest floor. This
functional ecological group of fungi seems to be underrepresented in our topsoil samples. Ryberg et al. (2009)
reported that numerous saprotrophic species are also poorly
represented in the sequence databases compared with mycorrhizal sequences, and this imbalance may explain the
apparent bias. Moreover, the season of sampling can influence the pattern of fungal richness and the under-representation of some species in our current samples (Taylor,
2002; Koide et al., 2007). However, several saprotrophic
species were found in all six soil samples. For instance, the
two ubiquitous anamorphic Basidiomycota yeast species
(Fonseca et al., 2000), Cryptococcus podzolicus and C. terricola, showed a large number of reads in the six forest soils,
and three Mortierella species were also very abundant in the
six soil samples (Table S2). Interestingly, the three functional ecological fungal groups (parasitic, saprotrophic and
mutualistic) were represented by the three most abundant
OTUs, belonging to Ceratobasidium, Cryptococcus and Lactarius genera, respectively.
Owing to the large proportion of unclassified fungi found
in the present and other soil surveys, a collection of curated
sequences for fungal identification is urgently needed.
Nevertheless, several of these unclassified fungal sequences
seem to correspond to a well-supported clade of Ascomycota,
equivalent to a subphylum, and referred to as soil clone
group I (Porter et al., 2008).
Amongst the taxonomically assigned species, EM species
from the Boletales, Agaricales, Thelephorales, Russulales,
Cantharellales and Sebacinales were predominant in the six
soil samples from different plantations (Tables S1 and S2),
supporting recent results on EM community structure
(Tedersoo et al., 2008). These authors reported a host preference of EM fungi in wet sclerophyll forest, but revealed
that the lineages of Cortinarius, Tomentella–Thelephora,
Russula–Lactarius, Clavulina, Descolea and Laccaria prevailed in the total community studied. The wide distribution of these fungi is likely to favour their dissemination
(Baker, 1966; Lockwood et al., 2005), as are their resistance
to environmental stresses and their capacity for invasiveness
(Desprez-Loustau et al., 2007).
The diversity and OTU richness between the six different
forest soils suggest a strong spatial heterogeneity. Numerous
The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation New Phytologist (2009)
New
Phytologist
factors could explain this diversity, including the influence
of the host tree or the impact of the soil organic matter.
Moreover, a difference in organic matter composition
and functioning has been reported in previous topsoil
analyses from three plantations of this site (Moukoumi
et al., 2006). The taxonomic information obtained in the
present high-throughput survey shows an unexpectedly high
richness of fungal species in forest soils. Additional 454
pyrosequencing-based surveys of fungal diversity will shed
light on the factors that have the largest impact on the
fungal communities.
Acknowledgements
We thank three anonymous referees for their comments
and suggestions on an earlier draft of the manuscript. This
project was funded by grants from the European Network
of Excellence EVOLTREE, the INRA ECOGER programme and the Région Lorraine Council (Project FORBOIS) to F.M. M.R. was funded by a PhD scholarship
from the Marie Curie Actions Host fellowships for Early
Stage Research Training (TraceAM project). We would like
to thank Dr Jacques Ranger and Dominique Gelhaye
(INRA Nancy) for their support and for providing access to
the Breuil-Chenue site. We would like to thank Dr Jonathan Plett for critical reading of the manuscript.
References
Acosta-Martinez V, Dowd S, Sun Y, Allen V. 2008. Tag-encoded
pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial diversity in a single soil type as
affected by management and land use. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 40:
2762–2770.
Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W,
Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation
of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 3389–
3402.
Artz RR, Anderson IE, Chapman SJ, Hagn A, Schloter M, Potts JM,
Campbell CD. 2007. Changes in fungal community composition in
response to vegetational succession during the natural regeneration of
cutover peatlands. Microbial Ecology 54: 508–522.
Baker GE. 1966. Inadvertent distribution of fungi. Canadian Journal of
Microbiology 12: 109–112.
Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Wheeler DL. 2008.
GenBank. Nucleic Acids Research 36: D25–D30.
Bidartondo M, Bruns T, Blackwell M, Edwards I, Taylor A, Horton T,
Zhang N, Koljalg U, May G, Kuyper TW et al. 2008. Preserving
accuracy in GenBank. Science 319: 1616.
Buée M, Vairelles D, Garbaye J. 2005. Year-round monitoring of diversity
and potential metabolic activity of the ectomycorrhizal community in a
beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest subjected to two thinning regimes. Mycorrhiza 15: 235–245.
Chao A, Chazdon RL, Colwell RK, Shen T-J. 2005. A new statistical
approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence
and abundance data. Ecology Letters 8: 148–159.
Desprez-Loustau M-L, Robin C, Buée M, Courtecuisse R, Garbaye J,
Suffert F, Sache I, Rizzo DM. 2007. The fungal dimension of biological
invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22: 472–480.
The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation New Phytologist (2009)
86
Research
Dickie IA, Xu B, Koide RT. 2002. Vertical niche differentiation of ectomycorrhizal hyphae in soil as shown by T-RFLP analysis. New Phytologist 156: 527–535.
Droege M, Hill B. 2008. The genome sequencer FLXTM System – longer
reads, more applications, straight forward bioinformatics and more complete data sets. Journal of Biotechnology 136: 3–10.
Fierer N, Breitbart M, Nulton J, Salamon P, Lozupone C, Jones R,
Robeson M, Edwards RA, Felts B, Rayhawk S et al. 2007. Metagenomic
and small-subunit rRNA analyses reveal the genetic diversity of bacteria,
archaea, fungi, and viruses in soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology
73: 7059–7066.
Finlay BJ. 2002. Global dispersal of free-living microbial eukaryote species.
Science 296: 1061–1063.
Fonseca A, Scorzetti G, Fell JW. 2000. Diversity in the yeast Cryptococcus
albidus and related species as revealed by ribosomal DNA sequence analysis. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 46: 7–27.
Genney DR, Anderson IC, Alexander IJ. 2005. Fine-scale distribution of
pine extomycorrhizas and their extrametrical mycelium. New Phytologist
170: 381–390.
Golubtsova YV, Glushakova AM, Chernov IY. 2006. The seasonal
dynamics of yeast communities in the rhizosphere of soddy-podzolic
soils. Eurasian Soil Science 40: 978–983.
Gomes NC, Fagbola O, Costa R, Rumjanek NG, Buchner A, MendonaHagler L, Smalla K. 2003. Dynamics of fungal communities in bulk
and maize rhizosphere soil in the tropics. Applied and Environmental
Microbiology 69: 3758–3766.
Hibbett DS, Binder M, Bischoff JF, Blackwell M, Cannon PF, Eriksson
OE, Huhndorf S, James T, Kirk PM, Lücking R et al. 2007. A higherlevel phylogenetic classification of the fungi. Mycological Research 111:
509–547.
Horton TR, Bruns TD. 2001. The molecular revolution in ectomycorrhizal ecology: peeking into the black-box. Molecular Ecology 10: 1855–
1871.
Horton T, Arnold AE, Bruns TD. 2009. FESIN workshops at ESA – the
mycelial network grows. Mycorrhiza 19: 283–285.
Huson DH, Auch AF, Qi J, Schuster SC. 2007. MEGAN analysis of
metagenomic data. Genome Research 17: 377–386.
Koide RT, Shumway DL, Xu B, Sharda JN. 2007. On temporal partitioning of a community of ectomycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 174: 420–
429.
Kõljalg U, Larsson KH, Abarenkov K, Nilsson RH, Alexander IJ, Eberhardt U, Erland S, Hoiland K, Kjoller R, Larsson E et al. 2005. UNITE:
a database providing web-based methods for the molecular identification
of ectomycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 166: 1063–1068.
Lindahl BD, Ihrmark K, Boberg J, Trumbore SE, Högberg P, Stenlid J,
Finlay RD. 2007. Spatial distribution of litter decomposition and
mycorrhzal nitrogen uptake in a boreal forest. New Phytologist 173: 611–
620.
Liu Z, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL, Knight G. 2008. Accurate taxonomy
assignments from 16S rRNA sequences produced by highly parallel
pyrosequencers. Nucleic Acids Research 36: e120.
Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T. 2005. The role of propagule
pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution
20: 23–28.
Martin F, Slater H. 2007. New Phytologist – an evolving host for ectomycorrhizal research. New Phytologist 174: 225–228.
Menkis A, Vasiliauskas R, Taylor AFS, Stenström E, Stenlid J, Finlay R.
2006. Fungi in decayed roots of conifer seedlings in forest nurseries,
afforested clear-cuts and abandoned farmland. Plant Pathology 55: 117–129.
Moukoumi J, Munier-Lamy C, Berthelin J, Ranger J. 2006. Effect of tree
species substitution on organic matter biodegradability and mineral
nutrient availability in a temperate topsoil. Annals of Forest Sciences 63:
763–771.
New Phytologist (2009) 184: 449–456
www.newphytologist.org
455
New
Phytologist
87
456 Research
Mueller GM, Schmit JP, Leacock PR, Buyck B, Cifuentes J, Desjardin
DE, Halling RE, Hjortstman K, Iturriaga T, Larsson K et al. 2007.
Global diversity and distribution of macrofungi. Biodiversity Conservation 16: 37–48.
Nilsson RH, Kristiansson E, Ryberg M, Larsson KH. 2005. Approaching
the taxonomic affiliation of unidentified sequences in public databases –
an example from the mycorrhizal fungi. BMC Bioinformatics 6: 178.
Nilsson RH, Ryberg M, Kristiansson E, Abarenkov K, Larsson KH.
2006. Taxonomic reliability of DNA sequences in public sequence databases: a fungal perspective. PLoS ONE 1: e59.
Nilsson RH, Kristiansson E, Ryberg M, Hallenberg N, Larsson KH.
2008. Intraspecific ITS variability in the kingdom Fungi as expressed in
the international sequence databases and its implications for molecular
species identification. Evolutionary Bioinformatics 4: 193–201.
Nilsson RH, Ryberg M, Abarenkov K, Sjökvist E, Kristiansson E. 2009.
The ITS region as a target for characterization of fungal communities
using emerging sequencing technologies. FEMS Microbiology Letters.
296: 97–101.
Nordén B, Paltto H. 2001. Wood-decay fungi in hazel wood: species richness correlated to stand age and dead wood features. Biological Conservation 101: 1–8.
O’Brien HE, Parrent JL, Jackson JA, Moncalvo JM, Vilgalys R. 2005.
Fungal community analysis by large-scale sequencing of environmental
samples. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71: 5544–5550.
Peter M, Ayer F, Egli S. 2001. Nitrogen addition in a Norway spuce stand
altered macromycetes sporocarp production and below-ground ectomycorrhizal species composition. New Phytologist 149: 311–325.
Porter TM, Schadt CW, Rizvi L, Martin AP, Schmidt SK, Scott-Denton
L, Vilgalys R, Moncalvo JM. 2008. Widespread occurrence and phylogenetic placement of a soil clone group adds a prominent new branch to
the fungal tree of life. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 46: 635–644.
Ranger J, Andreux BSF, Berthelin BP, Boudot JP, Bréchet C, Buée M,
Calmet JP, Chaussod R, Gelhaye D, Gelhaye L et al. 2004. Effet des
substitutions d’essence sur le fonctionnement organo-minéral de l’écosystème
forestier, sur les communautés microbiennes et sur la diversité des communautés fongiques mycorhiziennes et saprophytes (cas du dispositif expérimental
de Breuil – Morvan). Final report of contract INRA-GIP Ecofor 200124. Champenoux, France: N INRA 1502A, INRA BEF Nancy.
Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A. 2000. EMBOSS: the European molecular
biology open software suite. Trends in Genetics 16: 276–277.
Rinaldi AC, Comandini O, Kuyper TW. 2008. Ectomycorrhizal fungal
diversity: separating the wheat from the chaff. Fungal Diversity 33: 1–45.
New Phytologist (2009) 184: 449–456
www.newphytologist.org
Ryberg M, Kristiansson E, Sjökvist E, Nilsson RH. 2009. An outlook on
the fungal internal transcribed spacer sequences in GenBank and the
introduction of a web-based tool for the exploration of fungal diversity.
New Phytologist 181: 471–477.
Schadt CW, Martin AP, Lipson DA, Schmidt SK. 2003. Seasonal dynamics of previously unknown fungal lineages in tundra soils. Science 301:
1359–1361.
Seifert KA. 2008. Integrating DNA barcoding into the mycological
sciences. Persoonia 21: 162–166.
Taylor AFS. 2002. Fungal diversity in ectomycorrhizal communities:
sampling effort and species detection. Plant and Soil 244: 19–28.
Tedersoo L, Jairus T, Horton BM, Abarenkov K, Suvi T, Saar I, Kõljalg
U. 2008. Strong host preference of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a
Tasmanian wet sclerophyll forest as revealed by DNA barcoding and
taxon-specific primers. New Phytologist 180: 479–490.
Vandenkoornhuyse P, Baldauf SL, Leyval C, Straczek J, Young JPW.
2002. Extensive fungal diversity in plant roots. Science 295: 2051.
Vilgalys R. 2003. Taxonomic misidentification in public DNA databases.
New Phytologist 160: 4–5.
Wu M, Eisen JA. 2008. A simple, fast, and accurate method of phylogenomic inference. Genome Biology 9: R151.
Supporting Information
Additional supporting information may be found in the
online version of this article.
Table S1 Fungal community composition, at the genus
level, in the six forest soils
Table S2 Fungal community composition, at various taxonomic levels, in the six forest soil samples
Please note: Wiley-Blackwell are not responsible for the
content or functionality of any supporting information
supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing
material) should be directed to the New Phytologist Central
Office.
The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation New Phytologist (2009)
88
Supporting Information
Table S1 Fungal community composition, at the genus level, in the six forest soils.
Analysis of the six datasets (using BLASTn against the curated database) was obtained after
taxonomic clustering using MEGAN with the LCA parameter values set to 1; 35; 10 and 0 for
Min support, Min score, Top percent and Win score, respectively. The values shown
correspond to the number of reads in each taxonomic categories obtained from the 454pyrosequencing. Grey background: the most abundant genera (>100 reads).
* Genera proposed as being ectomycorrhizal (according to Rinaldi et al. 2008); but the status
of some species as mycorrhizal fungi is contested (EM?) and must be confirmed. Soils O, D,
S, B, P and F were sampled in oak, Douglas fir, spruce, beech, pine and fir plantations
respectively.
Soil O
Soil D
Soil S
Soil B
Soil P
Soil F
Acephala
1
0
10
0
0
0
Acremonium
0
1
0
0
0
0
Alatospora
8
0
1
0
0
0
Allantophomopsis
1
10
18
6
1
4
931
6
13
2
218
72
Amphisphaeriaceae
10
0
0
0
0
0
Aphanocladium
3
0
0
0
0
0
Arachnopeziza
4
0
1
3
1
0
Armillaria
3
2
0
0
0
0
Aspergillus
3
0
0
0
0
1
Athelia
0
3
5
7
4
4
Basidiobolus
1
0
0
0
0
1
9
3
10
0
56
10
Botryobasidium
12
14
25
61
27
20
Botryosphaeria
10
0
0
0
0
0
Bullera
0
1
1
0
0
0
Genera
Amanita
Boletus
Status (EM*)
EM
EM
89
Cadophora
5
0
0
0
0
0
Calcarisporium
3
0
0
0
0
6
Calocera
0
3
0
0
0
1
Capronia
5
2
3
0
0
3
177
158
366
194
184
405
Chaetosphaeria
75
16
13
28
30
23
Chaunopycnis
17
29
28
17
53
50
1
0
0
0
0
3
Cladophialophora
127
59
108
59
76
108
Cladosporium
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
23
2
1
1225 144
Clitocybe
2
0
0
0
0
0
Clonostachys
2
35
1
0
0
0
Coprinellus
0
0
0
0
0
1
Cordyceps
11
0
3
0
4
0
238
157
259
156
131
1595
Cryptococcus
1096
4255
4213 5272
4505 4752
Cudoniella
0
0
0
2
0
0
Cylindrosympodium
0
16
0
0
0
0
Cystoderma
0
0
0
0
2
6
Dactylaria
19
4
10
3
7
4
Dermea
158
93
78
118
109
102
Diplogelasinospora
0
0
0
0
1
0
Discostroma
0
0
0
5
0
0
Doratomyces
1
0
0
0
0
0
Dwayaangam
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
68
0
0
107
Eupenicillium
4
0
0
0
1
0
Exophiala
17
7
2
6
5
8
Fulvoflamma
1
4
3
0
3
17
Galerina
8
0
1
0
2
0
Ganoderma
0
0
2
0
5
1
Gelatinipulvinella
0
1
0
0
0
0
Cenococcum
Chloridium
Clavulina
Cortinarius
Elaphomyces
EM
EM?
EM
EM
EM
90
Geomyces
2
2
0
3
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
Gloeotinia
3
0
25
2
6
5
Grifola
0
1
0
0
0
0
Guehomyces
0
10
0
0
0
21
Gyoerffyella
0
1
0
0
0
0
Helicodendron
0
2
0
0
0
0
Hirsutella
1
1
0
0
0
0
Holwaya
54
4
17
1
6
4
Hyalodendriella
3
26
5
0
0
3
Hyaloscypha
0
0
3
0
7
0
Gigasporaceae
AM
Hydnotrya
EM
2
0
0
0
1
1
Hydnum
EM
0
0
0
0
1
274
Hymenoscyphus
0
0
0
0
1
1
Hypholoma
3
2
1
1
2
0
Hypocrea
4
2
0
0
0
0
Hypomyces
0
2
0
1
0
0
Inocybe
EM
7
769
875
1235
838
1123
Laccaria
EM
923
27
23
121
38
40
13
9
0
1
80
22
10545 2
25
6
57
86
Lecythophora
22
11
11
2
6
3
Leohumicola
0
0
0
0
2
0
Lophodermium
0
0
1
0
1
0
Lycoperdaceae
0
0
0
0
1
0
Mariannaea
2
0
0
0
0
0
Mastigobasidium
0
0
0
0
0
1
Megacollybia
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
72
0
6
16
Metarhizium
8
1
18
0
4
0
Micarea
0
0
1
0
0
0
Microbotryomycetes
0
0
0
4
2
0
Microdochium
4
0
0
0
0
0
Lachnum
Lactarius
Meliniomyces
EM
EM?
91
Microscypha
1
0
0
0
0
0
Mollisia
0
0
0
0
1
0
Monilinia
1
0
0
0
0
0
Mortierella
980
1925
5341 1677
1508 1517
Mycena
16
0
0
0
1
0
Nectriaceae
8
0
21
0
0
0
Nematoctonus
1
1
0
0
0
0
Neofabraea
160
951
972
1337
1120 1209
Neonectria
0
3
0
6
6
5
Nolanea
6
0
0
2
2
0
232
86
135
48
133
129
Oligoporus
3
0
0
0
0
0
Ombrophila
0
7
12
27
21
24
Ophiostoma
1
0
0
0
0
0
Parapleurotheciopsis
2
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
1
136
90
23
7
37
36
12
26
13
15
81
12
Phallus
1
0
0
0
1
0
Phialemonium
3
0
0
0
12
0
Phialocephala
36
5
13
6
0
8
Phlebia
0
0
0
0
1
0
Phlogicylindrium
3
4
8
0
0
126
0
0
0
0
0
1
Pleosporales
0
0
0
0
1
0
Pochonia
15
7
22
3
3
8
Polyporales
0
6
0
0
0
0
Preussia
0
1
0
0
0
2
Psathyrellaceae
4
0
1
0
0
0
Pseudaegerita
1
0
0
2
1
0
Pseudeurotiaceae
0
3
2
1
1
1
Pseudoclathrosphaerina
2
0
0
0
0
0
277
318
312
2
2
236
Oidiodendron
Paxillus
Ericoid M?
EM
Penicillium
Pezizaceae
Piloderma
Pseudotomentella
EM?
EM
EM
92
Psoraceae
0
1
2
5
4
2
Pucciniaceae
1
1
1
0
1
2
Ramularia
2
0
0
0
0
0
Readeriella
0
5
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
Rhizoscyphus
25
5
1
1
6
2
Rhizosphaera
0
0
0
0
0
2
Rhodosporidium
6
0
2
0
0
0
Rhodotorula
4
1
2
0
0
0
5174
1597
79
294
2755 769
0
0
1
0
1
99
1110
1246 2077
1514 1851
Scleromitrula
2
0
0
0
1
0
Scleropezicula
39
2
13
1
15
8
Sclerotiniaceae
0
0
1
0
0
0
Scytalidium
8
3
2
2
5
4
9
0
7
3
3
0
Sphaerobolus
0
0
2
0
0
0
Spirosphaera
35
0
0
0
0
0
Sporobolomyces
0
0
1
0
0
0
Sporothrix
1
0
0
0
0
0
Stachybotrys
11
4
4
6
3
4
Strobilurus
0
0
0
0
0
2
Talaromyces
5
1
0
3
2
0
Taphrina
4
0
0
0
0
0
Tephrocybe
2
0
0
0
0
0
480
531
29
12
266
88
1
1
1
0
0
3
Rhizopogon
Russula
EM
EM
Sarea
Scleroderma
Sebacina
Thelephora
EM
EM
EM
Thysanophora
0
Tomentella
EM
8
59
211
21
129
120
Tomentellopsis
EM
0
0
14
0
0
5
Trechispora
EM (?)
13
3
1
0
3
2
Tremella
1
2
7
0
2
0
Trichocladium
24
5
1
0
1
4
93
Trichoderma
5
4
1
0
4
3
Trichoglossum
6
1
0
2
0
1
Trichosporon
42
37
14
4
13
12
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Tuber
EM?
EM
Tumularia
Tylopilus
EM
0
0
16
Tylospora
EM
3
0
1450 5
39
2
Umbelopsis
4
0
4
0
1
1
Umbilicariaceae
2
0
1
0
0
0
Vascellum
0
1
0
0
0
0
Venturia
0
1
31
0
0
0
Venturiaceae
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Xenasmatella
23
0
2
0
0
0
Xenochalara
0
0
0
0
0
1
870
36
47
39
60
161
Zalerion
0
0
0
0
0
7
Zignoella
149
0
1
0
6
0
Wilcoxina
Xerocomus
EM
EM
94
Table S2 Fungal community composition, at various taxonomic levels, in the six forest
soil samplings. Analysis of the six datasets was obtained after taxonomic clustering using
MEGAN software with the LCA parameter values set to 5; 35; 10 and 0 for Min support, Min
score, Top percent and Win score, respectively. Values correspond to the number of reads in
each taxonomic categories obtained from the 454-pyrosequencing. *Amanita sp.
(brunnescens), previously only described in North America, was recorded in the soil samples
from oak plot. The sequence of this OTU had 99% of identities (227/229) on GenBank with
an uncultured soil fungus clone and the best hit with the first fully identified sequence was
with A. brunnescens, but with 93% identities (189/203). **Cortinarius sp. (saturninus) is
normally only associated with Salix, Populus or Corylus. Soils O, D, S, B, P and F were
sampled in oak, Douglas fir, spruce, beech, pine and fir plantations, respectively.
Soil O
Soil D
Soil S
Soil B
Soil P
Soil F
Acephala applanata
0
0
10
0
0
0
Agaricales
36
9
26
9
13
12
Agaricomycetes
0
5
11
0
6
5
Agaricomycetidae
109
5
13
0
6
51
Agaricomycotina
0
11
10
10
12
8
Alatospora acuminata
8
0
0
0
0
0
Allantophomopsis lycopodina
0
10
18
6
0
0
Amanita
0
0
0
0
0
5
Amanita sp. (brunnescens)*
8
0
0
0
0
0
Amanita fulva
22
0
0
0
0
0
Amanita rubescens
66
0
11
0
0
55
Amanita spissa
829
5
0
0
211
10
Amphisphaeriaceae
10
0
0
0
0
0
Ascomycota
1020
704
812
1174
1036 1146
Athelia epiphylla
0
0
5
6
0
0
95
Basidiomycota
17
28
22
15
16
23
Bionectriaceae
0
7
0
0
0
0
Boletales
0
37
34
94
50
66
Boletus
9
0
0
0
0
0
Boletus edulis
0
0
7
0
55
10
Botryobasidium subcoronatum
0
14
0
0
0
6
Botryobasidium subcoronatum
12
0
25
61
27
20
Botryosphaeria stevensii
10
0
0
0
0
0
Cadophora finlandica
5
0
0
0
0
0
Capnodiales
9
9
7
0
0
0
Capronia fungicola
5
0
0
0
0
0
Cenococcum geophilum
177
158
366
194
184
405
Chaetosphaeria chloroconia
53
13
13
21
23
19
Chaetosphaeriaceae
141
21
9
20
18
34
Chaunopycnis alba
17
29
28
17
53
50
Cladophialophora
0
0
7
0
0
0
Cladophialophora chaetospira
29
15
33
6
10
18
Cladophialophora minutissima
94
42
68
51
62
90
Clavulina cristata
0
23
0
0
1225 144
Clonostachys candelabrum
0
35
0
0
0
0
Cordyceps
7
0
0
0
0
0
Cortinariaceae
10
0
9
0
5
18
Cortinarius
14
6
6
0
0
1388
Cortinarius anomalus
81
0
0
0
0
0
Cortinarius obtusus
0
0
56
0
0
0
Cortinarius semisanguineus
0
0
0
0
0
51
Cortinarius tortuosus
0
0
6
0
0
0
Cortinarius delibutus
0
9
7
17
0
13
Cortinarius sp. (saturninus)**
143
142
184
138
122
141
Cryptococcus
7
0
0
0
0
0
Cryptococcus podzolicus
643
3592
3577
4407
3718 3991
Cryptococcus terricola
446
662
629
864
785
759
Cylindrosympodium lauri
0
16
0
0
0
0
96
Cystoderma amianthinum
0
0
0
0
0
6
Dactylaria appendiculata
19
0
9
0
7
0
Dermateaceae
235
0
23
16
19
11
Dermea
151
90
74
114
108
98
Dermea viburni
7
0
0
0
0
0
Dikarya
4540
8381
10411 7894
7080 7048
Discostroma tricellulare
0
0
0
5
0
0
Dothideomycetes
0
29
0
0
7
0
Elaphomyces muricatus
0
0
68
0
0
107
Exophiala
16
7
0
6
5
8
Fulvoflamma eucalypti
0
0
0
0
0
17
Fungi
560
903
1098
992
1124 960
Galerina pseudocamerina
8
0
0
0
0
0
Ganoderma applanatum
0
0
0
0
5
0
Gloeotinia temulenta
0
0
25
0
6
5
Guehomyces pullulans
0
10
0
0
0
21
Helotiales
46
0
0
28
0
0
Holwaya mucida
54
0
17
0
6
0
Hyalodendriella betulae
0
26
5
0
0
0
Hyaloscypha daedaleae
0
0
0
0
7
0
Hyaloscyphaceae
0
46
974
0
0
8
Hydnum albidum
0
0
0
0
0
274
Hypocreaceae
83
37
35
5
67
75
Hypocreaceae
108
8
20
0
24
20
Hypocreales
11
11
15
0
21
16
Inocybe
0
0
0
5
0
0
Inocybe napipes
0
0
0
0
0
100
Inocybe petiginosa
0
10
0
0
0
0
Inocybe umbrina
5
759
872
1230
837
1023
Laccaria
923
27
23
121
38
40
Lachnum
0
9
0
0
68
20
Lachnum sclerotii
9
0
0
0
11
0
Lactarius
101
0
9
6
0
48
97
Lactarius camphoratus
0
0
0
0
51
0
Lactarius glyciosmus
0
0
12
0
0
38
Lactarius quietus
6952
0
0
0
0
0
Lactarius tabidus
3489
0
587
0
95
305
Lecanorineae
0
0
0
5
0
0
Lecythophora mutabilis
22
11
11
0
6
0
Meliniomyces bicolor
0
0
0
0
0
8
Meliniomyces variabilis
0
0
72
0
0
8
Metarhizium
6
0
5
0
0
0
Metarhizium anisopliae
0
0
13
0
0
0
Microbotryomycetes
8
0
0
0
0
0
mitosporic Ascomycota
67
9
18
0
11
10
mitosporic Helotiales
16
0
57
0
11
0
mitosporic Orbiliaceae
8
10
0
0
9
0
Mortierella
251
349
760
469
412
438
Mortierella horticola
0
15
0
0
0
0
Mortierella gamsii
12
13
56
6
10
6
Mortierella humilis
196
454
2422
55
176
140
Mortierella hyalina
360
932
1817
1020
749
795
Mortierella macrocystis
159
162
284
127
158
134
Mycena
16
0
0
0
0
0
Nectriaceae
8
28
21
42
34
22
Neofabraea
125
885
917
1232
1029 1110
Neofabraea malicorticis
35
66
55
105
91
99
Nolanea sericea
6
0
0
0
6
0
Oidiodendron
68
43
77
22
100
89
Oidiodendron echinulatum
0
10
0
0
0
0
Oidiodendron pilicola
98
0
23
0
13
10
Oidiodendron scytaloides
7
10
11
0
0
5
Oidiodendron rhodogenum
59
19
19
21
18
21
Ombrophila violacea
0
7
12
27
21
24
Paxillus involutus
7
0
0
0
0
0
Penicillium
123
77
22
6
37
28
98
Penicillium coralligerum
6
0
0
0
0
0
Penicillium inflatum
5
8
0
0
0
0
Pezizaceae
12
26
13
15
81
12
Pezizomycotina
1224
587
1703
552
1646 1701
Phialocephala virens
5
5
12
0
7
8
Phialocephala xalapensis
31
0
0
0
0
0
Phialophora phaeophora
22
0
0
0
7
0
Phialophora phaeophora
0
0
0
7
0
0
Phlogicylindrium eucalyptorum 0
0
8
0
0
126
Pochonia
15
7
22
0
0
8
Polyporales
8
6
0
0
0
0
Pseudotomentella
0
0
85
0
0
0
Pseudotomentella tristis
277
318
227
0
0
236
Psoraceae
0
0
0
5
0
0
Readeriella gauchensis
0
5
0
0
0
0
Rhizoscyphus ericae
25
5
0
0
6
0
Rhodosporidium lusitaniae
6
0
0
0
0
0
Rhytismataceae
0
0
177
0
0
0
Russula
89
5
7
0
34
9
Russula cyanoxantha
275
0
0
0
0
0
Russula densifolia
0
0
0
0
0
436
Russula nigricans
372
118
0
0
0
0
Russula parazurea
4410
0
21
0
0
0
Russula grisea
0
0
0
139
0
0
Russula puellaris
0
1407
0
17
1183 0
Russula puellula
0
0
0
26
0
0
Russula rosea
0
0
0
13
0
0
Russula vesca
0
0
0
37
1510 276
Russula xerampelina
20
63
46
53
25
46
Russulaceae
11
0
0
0
10
0
Scleroderma sp.
98
1110
1246
2077
1514 1851
Sclerodermatineae
0
18
11
15
23
21
Scleropezicula alnicola
39
0
13
0
15
8
99
Scytalidium lignicola
8
0
0
0
5
0
Sebacina incrustans
9
0
5
0
0
0
Sordariomycetidae
438
18
23
28
30
25
Spirosphaera carici-graminis
35
0
0
0
0
0
Stachybotrys
11
0
0
6
0
0
Thelephora
7
14
0
0
0
0
Thelephora terrestris
0
429
5
0
5
86
Thelephora penicillata
471
88
23
9
261
0
Thelephoraceae
16
23
27
0
13
0
Tomentella
7
0
10
0
15
34
Tomentella sublilacina
0
55
201
0
110
82
Tomentella badia
0
0
0
17
0
0
Tomentellopsis submollis
0
0
14
0
0
5
Trechispora hymenocystis
13
0
0
0
0
0
Tremella
0
0
7
0
0
0
Trichocladium asperum
12
0
0
0
0
0
Trichocladium opacum
12
5
0
0
0
0
Trichocomaceae
41
9
7
15
22
14
Trichoderma
5
0
0
0
0
0
Trichoglossum hirsutum
6
0
0
0
0
0
Tricholomataceae
0
7
0
5
5
0
Trichosporon porosum
42
37
14
0
11
12
Tylopilus felleus
0
0
16
0
0
0
Tylospora fibrillosa
0
0
204
0
0
0
Tylospora asterophora
0
0
1246
5
37
0
Venturia
0
0
30
0
0
0
Venturiaceae
8
10
0
0
0
0
Xenasmatella vaga
23
0
0
0
0
0
Xerocomus badius
26
28
33
38
59
44
Xerocomus pruinatus
843
6
14
0
0
117
Zalerion arboricola
0
0
0
0
0
7
Zignoella pulviscula
149
0
0
0
6
0
100
101
6. Chapter V: Comparison of the capacity to describe fully
identified fungal species using the two high-throughput
techniques 454 pyrosequencing and NimbleGen phylochip
Marlis Reich, Marc Buée, Henrik Nilsson, Emillie Tisserant, Emmanuelle Morin, Annegret
Kohler, Francis Martin
(in preparation)
102
103
7. Chapter VI: Quantitative traceability of ectomycorrhizal
samples using ARISA
Marlis Reich, Christine Delaruelle, Jean Garbaye, Marc Buée
(in preparation for submitting to Forest Ecology and Management)
104
Abstract:
In the present context of growing interest for using ectomycorrhizal inoculation for practical
purpose, a simple and semi-quantitative molecular technique is needed to trace and quantify
the introduced fungi over time. Here, the quantification of three different ectomycorrhizal
fungal species associated with two different host tree species was tested using automated
ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA). The results show that this technique can be
used for semi-quantitative traceability of the ectomycorrhizal status of tree roots, based on the
relative heights of the peaks in the electropherograms.
Keywords
Ectomycorrhiza, ARISA, semi-quantitative analysis, traceability, relative peak abundance
105
Introduction
In the present context of growing interest for using ectomycorrhizal inoculation for practical
purpose (optimizing nursery techniques and forest stock production, improving the growth of
plantation forests, producing edible mushrooms such as truffles, chanterelles or cepes, etc.),
there is a need to quantify the ectomycorrhization rate in large-scale, field-based inoculation
experiments, for instance when assessing the efficiency of inoculants or inoculation
techniques, or when studying the competition between resident and introduced
ectomycorrhizal fungi. As the heterogeneity of such field experiments and the number of
replicate samples are high, the used technique must be simple and easy to handle.
Until now a wide range of molecular fingerprinting techniques have been used to trace and
identify fungal species (Henrion et al. 1992, 1994; Erland et al. 1994; Selosse et al. 1998;
Dickie et al. 2002; Pennanen et al. 2005), but the quantification of fungal species is most
often poorly or not at all estimated. For research work concerning quantifications, very often
the non-molecular based morphotyping followed by ectomycorrhizal root tip counting has
been the method of choice. All the techniques used in the early works mentioned above relied
on time-consuming and biased enzymatic digestions (Avis et al., 2007). Therefore, a more
simple technique is needed for automated quantification or at least semi-quantification of
mycorrhizal samples.
Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis (ARISA) is one of the electrophoresis
based fingerprinting techniques where the banding patterns are representing the different
PCR-amplified species from the sample. In comparison to the widely used T-RFLP technique,
multiple restriction digestion is not required. ARISA has mostly been used to describe
bacterial communities (Hernandez-Rasuet et al. 2006; Ikeda et al. 2008), but also fungal
communities (Torzilli et al. 2006) without linking the traceability of defined species with
semi-quantitative capacity of this technique.
The aim of the present work was therefore to test whether the ARISA technique has the
capacity to trace and semi-quantify inoculated fungal species in mycorrhizal associations.
This hypothesis has been tested on ectomycorrhizal root tips formed by Laccaria bicolor,
Paxillus involutus and Scleroderma citrinum, sampled from beech (Fagus sylvatica) and
Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) seedlings of a tree nursery in NorthEastern France. Mycorrhizal tips formed by the three different fungi were mixed in defined
quantities. The different species were identified by their specific ARISA electropherograms.
Relative peak height, calculated for each fungal species, significantly reflected the ratio of the
mixed root tips.
106
Materials and Methods
Biological material
Seeds of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) from provenance zone 412
(Washington State, USA) were stratified in moist peat at 4°C for 4 weeks to break dormancy.
Seeds of beech (Fagus sylvatica) from provenance 201 Nord-East were sown directly.
The three ectomycorrhizal fungi Laccaria bicolor S238N (Di Battista et al., 1996; short
distance explotation type according to Agerer, 2001) (LC), Paxillus involutus 01 (Px, longdistance exploration type with rhizomorphs) and Scleroderma citrinum Foug A (Sc, also long
distance with rhizomorphs) were separately maintained on Pachlewski agar medium
(Pachlewski & Pachlewska, 1974). Fungal inoculum was prepared by aseptically grown
mycelium in a peat-vermiculite nutrient mixture (Duponnois and Garbaye 1991).
Nursery
The experiment was performed in a bare-root forest nursery in Champenoux (eastern France).
Soil preparation, inoculation and growth conditions were carried out as described by FreyKlett et al. (1999). Fungal inoculum of different fungal species was separately distributed in
plots. Each plot had a size of 0.75m x 1.5 m and 0.6m distance to the next plot. Stratified
seedlings of Fagus and Pseudotsuga were sown separately in the different plots with one seed
every 2 cm. Seeds were covered by disinfected soil.
Sample processing and PCR
We harvested three individual seedlings of each host tree species, with their whole root
systems, six month after sowing. After morphologically determining the ectomycorrhizal
status of each seedling, ectomycorrhizal tips of the different morphotypes were pooled. For
each host tree, four artificial, mixed samples were assembled, each one with different
proportions of the three ectomycorrhizal types, but always with the total amount of 15
ectomycorrhizal root tips: (1) 5-5-5; (2) 13-1-1; (3) 1-13-1 and (4) 1-1-13 with L. bicolor, P.
involutus and S. citrinum, respectively. Three biological replicates per mixed sample (15
ectomycorrhizal root tips, 20-30 mg fresh weight) were analysed. Furthermore, three
biological replicates (mycelium samples, 100 mg fresh weight each) for each fungal species
were harvested from fungal plate cultures. All samples were snap-freezed in liquid nitrogen
and kept at -20°C, then ground in a ball mill. DNA was extracted from samples using the
DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France).
107
Only the ITS region 1 from DNA extracts were amplified with WellRED fluorescent dye D4PA
labelled
forward
primer
ITS1f
(Sigma-Aldrich,
Lyon,
France)
(5’-
CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3’) and unlabelled reverse primer ITS 2 (5’GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3’). The PCR reactions were carried out in a final volume
of 25 µ l reaction mixture containing 2.5 µ l of 1x PCR buffer (MP Biomedicals, Illkirch,
France), 1.5 mM MgCl2 (MP Biomedicals), 1.4 µ l of 16 mg/ml bovine serum albumine
(Sigma), each deoxynucleoside triphosphate at a concentration of 0.05 mM, each primer at a
concentration of 0.4 µ M, 0.5 U of Taq DNA Polymerase (MP Biomedicals) and 2 µ l of
extracted DNA (corresponding to 6 to13 ng DNA in the final mix, depending on the sample).
PCR included an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 1 min, followed by 30 cycles of 30 sec
at 94°C, 30 sec at 50°C and 2 min at 72°C with a final extension for 10 min at 72°C. On each
sample a technical replication was run.
Automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA)
1 µ l of 1:10 diluted PCR products were mixed with 0.5 µ l DNA size standard 600 nt
(Beckman Coulter®, Roissy, France) and 30 µ l of sample loading solution (Beckman
Coulter®). After covering the samples with a drop of oil, the intergenic spacer fragments
were run on a Beckman Coulter CEQ 8000 Genetic Analysis System. Peaks with a peak
height ≤ 5000 (dye signal, arbitrary unit) were excluded from the analysis. The threshold level
for intraspecies variation was set to ± 1.5 bp, according to the variability observed from the
analyses performed with the pure cultures of the three fungal species (results not shown).
Relative peak height was calculated by dividing individual peak heights by the total peak
heights per electropherogram.
Stastistical analysis
A correlation test was run using the Pearson’s product-moment correlation function of the R
software 2.7.2. Thereby the measured (ARISA-derived) relative abundance for each species
in the mixed samples was compared to the theoretical (known from mixing the composite
samples) relative abundance Correlation curves were drawn using the correlation curve
function of the Excel software (2008, version 12.1.3).
108
Results
ARISA analysis of free-living mycelium (pure cultures) produced electropherograms with a
large, specific rDNA ITS1 peak for each ectomycorrhizal species. The specific peak of S.
citrinum was detected at a fragment length of 299 bp, the one of L. bicolor at 358 bp and of P.
involutus at 397 bp (data not shown). The species specific peaks were used to correlate peak
appearance to species presence in electropherograms of mixed samples. Comparison of
electropherograms from technical and biological replicates indicated the conservation of peak
height proportions and reflected the composition of mycorrhizal root tips from the three
different fungi within mixed samples (Fig. 1). Fungal species present with only one
ectomycorrhizal root tip in a mixed sample of fifteen, could still be detected.
However, as we wanted to know whether ARISA electropherograms could be used for semiquantitative analysis, we compared the relative peak heights of mixed samples to theoretical
relative peak heights using statistical tests (Fig. 2). Correlation analysis revealed the
significance of linear regression of mixed sample ratios on theoretical ratios in both host trees
with r2=0.76; p<0.0002 and r2=0.98; p<0.00001 for Fagus and Pseudotsuga samples
respectively. Additionally, we calculated correlation coefficients and p-values for each
ectomycorrhizal species separately: theoretical and experimental ratios were for all three
tested species significantly correlated (r2>0.8; p-values < 0.004, data not shown).
109
Discussion
Molecular fingerprinting techniques have been largely used to identify individual mycorrhizas
(Gardes and Bruns 1993; Erland et al. 1994) or the influence of biotic and abiotic factors on
fungal community structures (Dickie et al. 2002; Pennanen et al. 2005; Ishida et al. 2007).
Nonetheless, identification in itself only reveals the presence of a fungal species in a fungal
community. Quantification of ectomycorrhizas from environmental sample seems to be more
problematic. One molecular approach allowing quantification is real-time quantitative PCR
(qPCR). It is frequently used in clinical diagnosis (Manzin et al. 1995; Sedgley et al. 2004) or
for growth assessment in mycological research (Cullen et al. 2001; Boyle et al. 2005).
Regarding ECM, qPCR has been used for quantifying Piloderma croceum mycelium in pure
cultures and rhizotron-grown P. croceum ectomycorrhizas (Schubert et al. 2003), or from soil
(Landeweert et al. 2003). However, qPCR is a time consuming technique because the
standardization process implies designing species-specific primers and a fastidious calibration
procedure.
ARISA creates 'fingerprints' of fungal samples from profiles of the ITS region of fungi, based
on the length of the amplified nucleotide sequence, which displays significant heterogeneity
between species. It is frequently used to describe and identify bacterial (Hernandez-Rasuet et
al. 2006; Ikeda et al. 2008; Lejon et al. 2005) as well as fungal communities (Torzilli et al.
2006) because it is very simple to operate. But anyhow the question is whether it can be used
for quantitative traceability of defined fungal species. There are several factors influencing
quantification. First, the fungal biomass of fungal species is likely to be variable because the
structure and the proportion of extra-radical mycelium of ectomycorrhizas differ widely
depending on the exploration type they belong to (Agerer 2001). Second, the amplification of
the fungal DNA from an ectomycorrhiza is dependent on the presence/absence of inhibitors
(e.g. polyphenolic compounds from the root tissues of the host-tree, or resulting from coextraction of the DNA of the host tree) or on other species in the sample.
To study the possible use of ARISA as a quantitative tracing technique, we calculated the
relative abundance of three ectomycorrhizal fungal species based on peak heights from
known fungal mixes. The used ectomycorrhizas belonged to different exploration types
(Agerer 2001) and were associated with two different host trees. DNA-extraction and PCR
amplification were carried out on the complete ectomycorrhizal mix to analyse the abovedescribed bias on quantitative use of ARISA.
Electropherograms of technical replicates showed similar results (data not shown), which
indicates a minor influence of DNA-extraction and PCR bias on our experiment. Regression
110
lines of the mixed samples from the two different host trees revealed a significant host effect.
However, the most important result is, that the significant correlation between the theoretical
and experimental data supports the idea of using ARISA as a quantitative tracing technique.
The influence of the fungal species on the ARISA results has been evaluated by calculating
regression for each species separately. A slight influence could be observed, but it can be
disregarded for quantitative analysis because of the very highly significant overall correlation
(p<0.004).
To conclude, ARISA can be used as an easy and reliable semi-quantitative technique to trace
ectomycorrhizal development in the field. However, its present limitation is that it only
determines the relative abundance of a given fungal species among the whole ectomycorrhizal
community, but not the total ectomycorrhizal colonization of the root systems studied.
Therefore, an interesting development of the method would be to design internal standards
(e.g. rDNA from the root tissues) to assess this variables.
Acknowledgement
The authors thank the European Union for supporting Marlis Reich through a Marie Curie
PhD scholarship. They are also grateful to Francis Martin for all his shrewd advices, to Dr.
François Rineau for valuable discussions about statistical analyses, and to Jean-Louis Churin
and Patrice Vion for handling the fungal inocula and producing the mycorrhizal seedlings in
the nursery.
111
References
Agerer R. (2001) Exploration types of ectomycorrhizae – A proposal to classify
ectomycorrhizal mycelial systems according to their patterns of differentiation and putative
ecological importance. Mycorrhiza 11:107-114
Avis PG, Dickie IA, Mueller GM (2007) A “dirty” business: testing the limitations of
terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP) analysis of soil fungi. Molecular
Ecology 15:873-882
Boyle B, Hamelin RC, Séguin A (2005) In vivo monitoring of obligate biotrophic pathogen
growth by kinetic PCR. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 71:1546-1552
Cullen DW, Lees AK, Toth IK, Duncan JM (2001) Conventional PCR and real-time
quantitative PCR detection of Helminthosporium solani in soil and on potato tubers. Eur. J.
Plant Pathol. 107:387-398
Di Battista C, Selosse MA, Bouchard D, Stenström E, Le Tacon F (1996) Variations in
symbiotic efficiency, phenotpic characters and ploidy level among different isolates of the
ectomycorrhizal basidiomycete Laccaria bicolor strain S238N. Mycological Research
100:1315-1324
Dickie IA, Xu B, Koide RT (2002) Vertical niche differentiation of ectomycorrhizal hyphae
in soil as shown by T-RFLP analysis. New Phytologist 156:527-535
Duponnois R, Garbaye J (1991) Mycorrhization helper bacteria associated with the Douglasfir-Laccaria laccata symbiosis: Effects in aseptic and in glasshouse conditions. Annales
des Sciences Forestières 48:239-251
Erland S, Henrion B, Martin F, Glover LA, Alexander IJ (1994) Identification of the
ectomycorrhizal basidiomycete Tylospora fibrillosa Donk by RFLP analysis of the PCRamplified ITS and IGS regions of ribosomal DNA. New Phytologist 126:525-532
Frey-Klett P, Churin JL, Pierrat JC, Garbaye J (1999) Dose effect in the dual inoculation of an
ectomycorrhizal fungus and a mycorrhiza helper bacterium in two forest nurseries. Soil
Biology and Biochemistry 31:1555-1562
Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes –
application to identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology 2:113-118
Hernandez-Raquet G, Budzinski H, Caumette P, Dabert P, Le Ménach K, Muyzer G, Duran R
(2006) Molecular diversity studies of bacterial communities of oil polluted microbial mats
from the Etang de Berre (France). FEMS Microbiology Ecology 58:550-562
112
Henrion B, Le Tacon F, Martin F (1992) Rapid identification of genetic variation of
ectomycorrhizal fungi by amplification of ribosomal RNA genes. Molecular Ecology
122:289-298.
Henrion B, Di Battista C, Bouchard D, Vairelles D, Thompson BD, Le Tacon F, Martin F
(1994) Monotoring the persistence of Laccaria bicolor as an ectomycorrhizal symbiont of
nursery-grown Douglas fir by PCR of the rDNA intergenic spacer. Molecular Ecology
3:571-580.
Ikeda S, Rallos LEE, Okubo T, Eda S, Inaba S, Mitsui H, Minamisava K (2008) Microbial
community analysis of field-grown soybeans with different nodulation phenotypes. Appl.
Env. Microbiol. 74:5704-5709
Ishida T A, Nara K and Hogetsu T (2007) Host effects on ectomycorrhizal fungal
communities: insight from eight host species inmixed conifer-broadleaf forests. New
Phytologist 174:430-440
Landeweert R, Veenman C, Kuyper TW, Fritze H, Wernars K, Smit E (2003) Quantification
of ectomycorrhizal mycelium in soil by real-time PCR compared to conventional
quantification techniques. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 45:283-292
Lejon DPH, Chaussod R, Ranger J, Ranjard L (2005) Microbial community structure and
density under different tree species in an acid forest soil (Morvan, France). Microbial
Ecology 50:614-625
Manzin A, Solforosi L, Bianchi D, Gabrielli A, Giostra F, Bruno S, Clementi M (1995) Viral
load in samples from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients with various clinical
conditions. Res. Virol. 146:279-284
Pachlewski R, Pachlewska J (1974) Studies on symbiotic properties of mycorrhizal fungi of
pine (Pinus sylvestris) with the aid of the method of mycorrhizal synthesis in pure culture
on agar. Forest research institute, Warsaw, Poland
Pennanen T, Heiskanen J, Korkama T (2005) Dynamics of ectomycorrhizal fungi and growth
of Norway spruce seedlings after planting on a mounded forest clearcut. Forest Ecology
and Management 213:243-252
Schubert R, Raidl S, Funk R, Bahnweg G, Müller-Starck G, Agerer R (2003) Quantitative
detection of agar-cultivated and rhizotron-grown Piloderma croceum Erikss. & Hjortst. by
ITS1-based fluorescent PCR. Mycorrhiza 13:159-165
Sedgley C, Nagel A, Shelburne C, Clewell D, Appelbe O, Molander A (2004) Quantitative
real-time PCR detection of oral in humans. Archives of Oral Biology 50:575 - 583
113
Selosse MA, Jacquot D, Bouchard D, Martin F, Le Tacon F (1998) Temporal persistence and
spatial distribution of an American inoculant strain of the ectomycorrhizal basidiomycete
Laccaria bicolor in a French forest plantation. Molecular Ecology 7:561-573
Torzilli AP, Sikaroodi M, Chalkley D, Gillevet PM (2006) A comparison of fungal
communities from four salt marsh plants using automated ribosomal intergenic spacer
analysis (ARISA). Mycologia 98:690-698
114
Fig. 1: ARISA-electropectograms of four Pseudotsuga menziesii mycorrhizal root tip
samples. Each sample contained in total 15 mycorrhizal root tips of three ECM species, but
quantities of each fungal species differed between samples. Mycorrhizal root tips/sample:
diagram A: 5-5-5; diagram B: 1-1-13; diagram C: 13-1-1; diagram D: 1-13-1 with S. citrinum
セ
セ
セ
Lセ
セ
0
<
>
0
0
0
. ,•
,
•>
-
セ
!
0
0
0
0
0
·
·
·
·
·
b-
o'
.·
,<.
セ
セ
セ
Lセ "
0
<
.-;:'
>
;
•
1-
1-.
;•
c
セ
o
o
>
o
o
o
. f.. ,
. •
o
<
•
•>
セ
o
セ
o
ァセ
セ
セ
" セ
セo
セ
o
o
>
o
o
o
>
o
セ
,
o
tj"j"j"j"j .. I..I. セ
0 0 0 CO 0
\M・セッB
[セZ 。 q ウ
0
0
0
gggggggf
」セ
,
セ
セ
Zセ
1-.
o
o
o
"o
0
0
0
0
>
"0
0
0
0
o
<
i-.
セZ
·
·
,
·
i-'
,
·
·
·
セ
·
, 1-.· ,
l-
e-.
r'
h
o
;;1
gセ
r'
t:1-.
,...
0
0
0
0
"
0
,
t3 !
O)'e SiQnal
1'-.
,
1-.
1"-'
i-.
b-.
r'
1;:::
1'-:
Zセ
1-.
1-.
·
セN
1-.
=
1
go .:.,
0
0
0
oo
o
o
o
"0
O)'e SiQnal
.-
o "'
o
0
セ⦅エ
f_:
0
0
0
0
"
oo
o
o
o
"0
O)'e SiQnal
セ
,,
(Sc)- L. bicolor (Lc)- P. involutus (Px).
115
Fig. 2: Regression line between theoretical and measured ratio values of the four mycorrhizal
root tip mixes, in which the mycorrhiza from three different fungi (black, Laccaria bicolor;
white, Scleroderma citrinum; grey, Paxillus involutus) have been regrouped in following
quantities: 5-5-5; 13-1-1; 1-13-1; 1-1-13. Two independent correlation curves were calculated
for the mycorrhizal mixes dependent on host tree association: Fagus sylvatica (diamonds,
constant line; R2=0.764; p<0.001) and Pseudotsuga menziesii (triangles, dotted line;
R2=0.983; p<0.0001).
0.9
;
0.8
0.7
セ
セ
,
0
0.6
--•
.E 0.5
•
-
" O.'
a
•
0
•
0
ë 0.3
0.2
セO
セ
Oセ
セ
.... V
Oセ
•
•
0.1
0
o
0.1
0.2
0.3
O.,
0.5
0.6
theol"ctical ratio values
0.7
0.8
0.9
116
117
8. Chapter VII: Symbiosis insights from the genome of the
mycorrhizal basidiomycete Laccaria bicolor.
Martin F, Aerts A, Ahrén D, Brun A, Danchin EGJ, Duchaussoy F, Gibon J, Kohler A,
Lindquist E, Pereda V, Salamov A, Shapiro HJ, Wuyts J, Blaudez D, Buée M, Brokstein P,
Canbäck B, Cohen D, Courty PE, Coutinho PM, Delaruelle C, Detter JC, Deveau A, DiFazio
S, Duplessis S, Fraissinet-Tachet L, Lucic E, Frey-Klett P, Fourrey C, Feussner I, Gay G,
Grimwood J, Hoegger PJ, Jain P, Kilaru S, Labbé J, Lin YC, Legué V, Le Tacon F,
Marmeisse R, Melayah D, Montanini B, Muratet M, Nehls U, Niculita-Hirzel N, Oudot-Le
MP, Peter M, Quesneville H, Rajashekar B, Reich M, Rouhier N, Schmutz J, Yin T, Chalot
M, Henrissat B, Kües U, Lucas S, Van de Peer Y, Podila G, Polle A, Pukkila PJ, Richardson
PM, Rouzé P, Sanders IR, Stajich JE, Tunlid A, Tuskan G, Grigoriev IV
(published in Nature (2008) 452: 88-92)
118
119
9. Chapter VIII: Fatty acid metabolism in the ectomycorrhizal
fungus Laccaria bicolor
Marlis Reich, Cornelia Göbel, Annegret Kohler, Marc Buée, Francis Martin, Ivo Feussner,
Andrea Polle
(published in New Phytologist (2009) 182: 950-964)
Research
120
Fatty acid metabolism in the ectomycorrhizal fungus
Laccaria bicolor
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Marlis Reich1,2, Cornelia Göbel3, Annegret Kohler1, Marc Buée1, Francis Martin1, Ivo Feussner3
and Andrea Polle2
1
INRA (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)-Nancy Université, UMR1136, Interactions Arbres/Microorganismes, INRA-Nancy, France; 2Büsgen-
Institut, Department of Forest Botany and Tree Physiology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; 3Albrecht-von-Haller Institute for Plant
Sciences, Department of Plant Biochemistry, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
Summary
Authors for correspondence:
Andrea Polle
Tel: +49 551 39 3480
Email: apolle@gwdg.de
Ivo Feussner
Tel: +49 551 39 5742
Email: ifeussn@uni-goettingen.de
New Phytologist (2009) 182: 950–964
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02819.x
Key words: Laccaria bicolor, lipid
metabolism, marker lipid, mycorrhiza,
subcellular localization.
• Here, the genome sequence of the ectomycorrhizal basidiomycete Laccaria bicolor
was explored with the aim of constructing a genome-wide inventory of genes involved
in fatty acid metabolism.
• Sixty-three genes of the major pathways were annotated and validated by the
detection of the corresponding transcripts. Seventy-one per cent belonged to
multigene families of up to five members. In the mycelium of L. bicolor, 19 different
fatty acids were detected, including at low concentrations palmitvaccenic acid
(16:1(11Z)), which is known to be a marker for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.
• The pathways of fatty acid biosynthesis and degradation in L. bicolor were
reconstructed using lipid composition, gene annotation and transcriptional
analysis. Annotation results indicated that saturated fatty acids were degraded
in mitochondria, whereas degradation of modified fatty acids was confined to
peroxisomes.
• Fatty acid synthase (FAS) was the second largest protein annotated in L. bicolor.
Phylogenetic analysis indicated that L. bicolor, Ustilago maydis and Coprinopsis
cinerea have a vertebrate-like type I FAS encoded as a single protein, whereas in other
basidiomycetes, including the human pathogenic basidiomycete Cryptococcus
neoformans, and in most ascomycetes FAS is composed of the two structurally
distinct subunits α and β.
Abbreviations: aa, amino acids; ACC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase; ACDH, acyl-CoA
dehydrogenase; ACP, acyl carrier protein; ACT, acylcarnitine transferase; AcCT,
acetylcarnitine transferase; ACX, acyl-CoA oxidase; ASG, acylated sterol glycoside;
AT, acetyl-CoA-ACP transacetylase; CACT, carnitine/acylcarnitine translocase;
DAG, diacylglycerol; DCI, Δ3,5,Δ2,4-dienoyl-CoA isomerase; DCR, 2,4-dienoyl-CoA
reductase; DGDG, diglycosyl diacylglycerol; DH, 3-hydroxyacyl-ACP dehydratase;
ECH, enoyl-CoA hydratase; ER, β-enoyl reductase; EST, expressed sequence tag; FA,
fatty acid; FAS, fatty acid synthase; FFA, free fatty acid; GC, glucosyl ceramide;
HCDH, 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase; IDH, isocitrate dehydrogenase; KCT, 3ketoacyl-CoA thiolase; KR, 3-ketoacyl reductase; KS, 3-ketoacyl synthase; LACS:
long chain FA-CoA ligase; MAG, monoacylglycerol; MFP, peroxisomal D-specific
bifunctional protein harbouring hydratase-dehydrogenase activities; MT, malonylCoA-ACP transacylase; PA, phosphatidic acid; PC, phosphatidyl choline; PE,
phosphatidyl ethanolamine; PI, phosphatidyl inositol; PS, phosphatidyl serine; PPT,
phosphopantetheinyl transferase; PXA: peroxisomal long-chain FA import protein
(ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter); SE, sterol ester; SG, sterol glycoside; SGD,
Saccharomyces Genome Database; SPE, solid phase extraction; TAG, triacylglycerol;
TLC, thin-layer chromatography; WGEO, whole-genome expression oligoarray.
950 New Phytologist (2009) 182: 950–964
950 www.newphytologist.org
© The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation © New Phytologist (2009)
121
Research
Introduction
Fatty acids (FAs), the major building blocks of lipids, are common
to all living cells. They are components of membranes and storage
lipids. In addition to these central functions, FAs and their derivatives also play important roles as signalling molecules (Berg et al.,
2006) and as crucial compounds in establishing pathogenic
plant–fungal interactions (Wilson et al., 2004; Klose & Kronstad,
2006). Fungi generally accumulate significant amounts of lipids
in hyphae as well as in spores, and these lipids serve as carbon
and energy sources during starvation and spore germination
(Martin et al., 1984; Laczko et al., 2003; Trépanier et al., 2005).
In mutualistic interactions, such as mycorrhizas, the fungal
partner is dependent on carbon supply by the host. Arbuscular
mycorrhizal fungi metabolize plant-derived carbohydrates into
lipids, yielding lipid bodies which can then be transported from
the intra- to the extraradical hyphae; during their journey to
the hyphal tips, lipids are partly consumed but re-shuttling
also takes place (Sancholle et al., 2001; Bago et al., 2002a,b).
During the formation of ectomycorrhizas, the composition of
FAs also shows drastic changes, probably also involving lipid
translocation (Martin et al., 1987; Laczko et al., 2003).
In addition, FAs have been used as markers to characterize
microbial communities (Olsson 1999; van Aarle & Olsson,
2003; Bååth, 2003) and soil food webs (Ruess et al., 2002). The
unsaturated FA palmitvaccenic acid, 16:1(11Z) (x:y(z) denotes
an FA with x carbons and y double bonds in position z counting
from the carboxyl end), which corresponds to the denomination
16:1(ω5) or 16:1(n-5), has been widely applied to estimate
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil samples and quantify
fungal colonization (van Aarle & Olsson, 2003; Nilsson et al.,
2005; Stumpe et al., 2005). The phospholipid FA 18:2(9Z,12Z)
(=18:2(ω6,9)) was used to assess the amount of ectomycorrhizal fungi (Bååth et al., 2004) but occurs also in saprophytes
(Olsson, 1999). Despite the widespread utilization of FAs
as biological markers and their importance for many life
functions, little is known on lipid biosynthesis and degradation
in ectomycorrhizal fungi.
The objective of this study was to identify and characterize
the set of genes involved in FA biosynthesis, modification, and
degradation in the recently sequenced Laccaria bicolor genome
(Martin et al., 2008). Starting with the analysis of all FAs and
many lipid classes our analysis included cataloguing predicted
FA metabolism proteins, predicting their subcellular localisation
and validation of their expression by transcriptional analysis on
whole genome arrays. Phylogenetic analyses of fatty acid synthase
(FAS) revealed striking differences in FA biosynthesis between
L. bicolor and other sequenced fungi.
Hydnangiaceae) was grown on 10 cellophane-covered agar
plates containing Pachlewski medium (Di Battista et al., 1996)
for 3 wk in darkness at 25°C. Only the three most healthy
looking mycelia, which were evenly grown over the agar plate,
were used for futher analysis. Ectomycorrhizas of L. bicolor
S238N/Pseudotsuga menziesii were synthesized by growing
Douglas fir seedlings for 9 months in polyethylene containers
filled with a peat-vermiculite mix (1:1, v/v) and mixed with 2.5%
(v/v) L. bicolor S238N inoculum as described previously (FreyKlett et al., 1997). Inoculated Douglas fir plantlets were grown
in a glasshouse with 25°C : 15°C (day : night) temperature
and fertilised once a week with 80 mg l−1 KNO3 and 0.2 ml l−1
Kanieltra (COFAZ, Paris, France). Additionally, plants without
fungal inoculum were grown under the same conditions and
further Douglas fir seedlings were raised under axenic conditions
for 2 months (Duciç et al., 2008). Ectomycorrhizal root tips
of L. bicolor and noninfected fine roots of control plants
were identified under the dissection microscope and stored
frozen in liquid nitrogen for further analyses.
Microarray analysis
RNA extraction of mycelium and ectomycorrhizas was carried
out using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Total RNA preparations (three biological replicates)
were amplified using the SMART PCR cDNA Synthesis Kit
(Clontech, Saint Quentin Yvelines, France) according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. Single dye labelling of samples,
hybridization procedures, data acquisition, background correction
and normalization were performed at the NimbleGen facilities
(NimbleGen Systems, Reykjavik, Iceland) following their
standard protocol. The L. bicolor 4-plex (4 × 72k) whole-genome
expression oligoarray v 2.0 (WGEO), manufactured by
NimbleGen (Madison, WI, USA), contains three independent,
nonidentical, 60-mer probes per whole gene model. For 4702
gene models the array contains technical replicates. To estimate
a cut-off level for expression, the mean signal intensity of 2032
random probes present on the microarray was calculated.
Gene models with a signal intensity 3-fold higher than the
calculated cut-off value of 78 were considered as transcribed.
In the present study, signal intensities for transcripts of genes
related to FA metabolism are shown. Relative expression
levels were calculated as transcript signal in ectomycorrhiza/
transcript signal in free-living mycelium. Student’s t-test,
in combination with false discovery rate multiple testing
corrections included in the ArrayStar 2 analysis software
(DNASTAR Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA), was used to
identify genes whose transcripts changed significantly with
P-values ≤ 0.05.
Materials and Methods
Fungal culture, ectomycorrhiza synthesis and harvest
Quantitative RT-PCR
Free-living mycelium of Laccaria bicolor (monocaryotic strain
S238N-H82 (INRA Nancy), phylum: Basidiomycota, Agaricales,
To validate array analyses, quantitative RT-PCR was performed
for selected genes (whose protein identification numbers (IDs)
© The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation © New Phytologist (2009)
New Phytologist (2009) 182: 950–964
www.newphytologist.org
951
122
952 Research
can be found at http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Lacbi1/Lacbi1.home.
html), namely acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC; ID: 187554),
Δ9-fatty acid desaturase (scaffold 8; ID 189797), Δ12-fatty acid
desaturase (scaffold 3; ID 292603), 3-ketoacyl-CoA synthase
(subunit of fatty acid-elongase of ELO type; ID 186873) and
fatty acid synthase (FAS; scaffold 11; ID 296983), and for three
house-keeping genes, namely elongation factor 3 (ID 186873),
GTPase β-subunit (ID 190157) and metalloprotease (ID
245383). Primers were designed using the software AmplifX
1.37 (http://ifrjr.nord.univ-mrs.fr/AmplifX) and Primer3
(http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/primer3/input.htm) and are shown
in Supporting Information Table S1.
Quantitative PCR assays were performed in Low Profile
Thermo-Strips (ABgene, Surrey, UK) using a Chromo 4
Detector (MJ Research, Waltham, MA, USA). The reaction
mixture contained 2 × iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad),
300 nM of each primer and 18.75 ng of cDNA from L. bicolor
mycelium or ectomycorrhizas. Three biological and three
technical replicates were analysed for each tissue. Data were
analysed using the relative quantification method of Pfaffl
(2001). Quantitative real-time PCR supported the WGEO
analyses as the two methods gave similar results, although
different extracts were used (Table S2).
Extraction and detection of lipids by gas and thin-layer
chromatography
Fungal and plant tissues were freeze-dried (Dura-TopTM/FTS
SystemsTM; BioBlock Scientific, Illkirch Cedex, France). For
gas chromatography/flame ionization detection (GC/FID),
FAs from 10 mg of lyophilised fungal or plant material was
converted to their methyl esters (Miquel & Browse, 1992). For
quantification of the FAs, 20 µg of triheptadecanoate was added
and the sample was re-dissolved in 10 µl of acetonitrile for GC
analysis performed with an Agilent (Waldbronn, Germany)
6890 gas chromatograph fitted with a capillary DB-23 column
(30 m × 0.25 mm; 0.25 µm coating thickness; J&W Scientific,
Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany). Helium was used as the carrier
gas at a flow rate of 1 ml min−1. Two different temperature
gradients were used for the fatty acid methyl ester (FAME)
analysis. The temperature gradient was either 150°C for 1 min,
150–200°C at 8 K min−1, 200–250°C at 25 K min−1 and 250°C
for 6 min or 150°C for 1 min, 150–200°C at 4 K min−1,
200–250°C at 5 K min−1 and 250°C for 6 min (Stumpe et al.,
2005; Przybyla et al., 2008).
For thin-layer chromatography (TLC) analysis of different
lipid classes, total lipids were extracted from 50 mg of lyophilized fungal material with chloroform:methanol (1 : 2, v/v)
for 4 h at 4°C. After centrifugation (3000 g for 5 min at 4°C),
the supernatant was collected and the pellet was re-extracted with
chloroform:methanol (2 : 1, v/v) for 16 h at 4°C. The resulting
lipid extracts were combined and filtrated with cotton wool
soaked with NaSO4 and dried under streaming nitrogen. The
total lipids were separated into neutral lipids, glycolipids and
New Phytologist (2009) 182: 950–964
www.newphytologist.org
phospholipids on a solid phase extraction column (Strata
SI-1 Silica, 100 mg/1 ml; Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg,
Germany). Neutral lipids were eluted with 10 ml of chloroform, glycolipids with 10 ml of acetone:2-propanol (9 : 1,
v/v) and finally phospholipids with 10 ml of methanol:acetic
acid (9 : 1, v/v). These three fractions were further resolved
on 10 × 20 cm silica gel 60 TLC plates (Merck, Darmstadt,
Germany): Neutral lipids were developed with petroleum
ether:diethyl ether:acetic acid (70 : 30 : 0.5, v/v/v), glycolipids
with chloroform:methanol (85 : 15, v/v) and phospholipids
with chloroform:methanol:acetic acid (65 : 25 : 8, v/v/v).
The individual lipid classes were identified after incubation
in CuSO4 solution (0.4 M CuSO4 in 6.8 % (v/v) H3PO4)
and heating at 180°C.
Gene annotation of FA metabolism in Laccaria bicolor
S238N-H82
Putative genes that encode FA metabolism enzymes initially were
identified based on the automatic annotation in the publicly
accessible Laccaria genome database (http://mycor.nancy.inra.fr/
IMGC/LaccariaGenome/) at the Joint Genome Institute ( JGI).
Additionally, searches were performed using a range of sequences
of FA metabolism proteins and genes (Mekhedov et al., 2000)
available from fungi (Cryptococcus neoformans, Neurospora crassa,
Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe) at the
National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)
GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and the Universal
Protein Resource (UNIPROT) (http://expasy.org/) to probe
the Laccaria genome database using the BLASTN, TBLASTN,
and BLASTP algorithms as incorporated in the JGI accession
page and the INRA Laccaria DB (http://mycor.nancy.inra.fr/
IMGC/LaccariaGenome/). The putative homologues that were
detected were characterized based on conserved domains (CDD
of NCBI; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/
cdd.shtml), identities, and E-values. Laccaria bicolor gene
models were corrected when necessary. Manual annotation was
carried out using the artemis software (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/
Software/Artemis/). The manually annotated gene sequences
were aligned and verified using the programs ClustalX
(http://www.embl.de/~chenna/clustal/darwin/) and genedoc
(http://www.psc.edu/biomed/genedoc/). Each curated
homologue was further used for a BLAST search at the JGI,
YeastDB (http://www.yeastgenome.org/) and Broad-MIT
Institute (http://www.broad.mit.edu/) databases to check for
similar genes in other fungi, including Aspergillus nidulans,
Coprinopsis cinerea, C. neoformans, N. crassa, Ustilago maydis,
Phanerochaete chrysosporum and S. cerevisiae.
Subcellular localization of putative proteins was predicted
using TargetP 1.1 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/),
mitoprot server (http://ihg.gsf.de/ihg/mitoprot.html), predotar server (http://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/predotar/predotar.html),
‘The PTS1 predictor’ server (http://mendel.imp.ac.at/
mendeljsp/sat/pts1/PTS1predictor.jsp) and wolf psort (http://
© The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation © New Phytologist (2009)
123
Research
Table 1 Fatty acid composition of free-living
mycelium, ectomycorrhizas of Laccaria
bicolor (EM) and Pseudotsuga menziesii
(Douglas-fir) roots
FA
Mycelium (%)
EM (%)
Uninoculated roots
(%)
14:0
15:0
16:0
16:1 (9Z)
16:1 (11Z)
14-Me-16:0
18:0
18:1 (9Z)
18:1 (11Z)
18:2 (5Z.9Z)
18:2 (9Z.12Z)
18:3 (5Z.9Z.12Z)
18:3 (9Z.12Z.15Z)
20:0
20:1 (11Z)
20:2 (11Z.14Z)
20:3 (5Z.11Z.14Z)
21:0
22:0
23:0
23:1 (14Z)
24:0
24:1 (15Z)
18:0 DiCOOH
20:0 DiCOOH
22:0 DiCOOH
0.19 ± 0.01
0.97 ± 0.03
14.33 ± 0.22b
0.27 ± 0.01c
0.09 ± 0.03a
nd
0.82 ± 0.06a
27.19 ± 1.59b
0.05 ± 0.01a
nd
49.51 ± 2.49a
nd
0.15 ± 0.02a
0.30 ± 0.04a
0.25 ± 0.01a
0.09 ± 0.01a
nd
0.03 ± 0.01a
0.50 ± 0.11a
0.23 ± 0.05a
0.13 ± 0.01a
4.20 ± 0.71a
0.64 ± 0.04a
nd
nd
nd
(µmol g−1 DW)
119.51 ± 4.18b
nd
nd
16.09 ± 5.01b
0.23 ± 0.02b
0.26 ± 0.08b
2.76 ± 0.35a
2.59 ± 1.91a
4.06 ± 1.60a
0.51 ± 0.21b
1.52 ± 1.65a
39.73 ± 8.01b
2.53 ± 0.76a
2.96 ± 0.93b
3.78 ± 0.78b
nd
0.34 ± 0.42a
1.89 ± 0.23a
nd
7.40 ± 1.84b
1.99 ± 0.70a
0.34 ± 0.22a
3.05 ± 1.07a
6.70 ± 1.99b
1.35 ± 0.41a
2.35 ± 0.65a
1.79 ± 0.57a
(µmol g−1 DW)
37.33 ± 8.06a
nd
nd
9.60 ± 1.42a
0.15 ± 0.01a
0.05 ± 0.04a
5.99 ± 0.88b
2.55 ± 0.66a
5.32 ± 1.67a
0.50 ± 0.25b
0.90 ± 0.31a
20.40 ± 7.03b
3.84 ± 1.63a
3.98 ± 1.36b
7.62 ± 2.30c
0.22 ± 0.10a
0.24 ± 0.11a
4.33 ± 1.25b
1.15 ± 1.07b
14.18 ± 4.02c
0.71 ± 0.16a
0.38 ± 0.34a
3.40 ± 1.07a
3.28 ± 2.03b
2.74 ± 1.43b
4.31 ± 1.96b
2.35 ± 1.17a
(µmol g−1 DW)
26.94 ± 2.93a
Total amount of fatty acids
nd, not detected.
Mycelium was cultivated as described in Materials and Methods and harvested after 22 d. Douglasfir seedlings were inoculated with L. bicolor. Ectomycorrhizas and roots of uninoculated seedlings
were harvested after 8 months. Roots of axenically grown Douglas-fir seedlings showed the
same lipid composition. Data indicate means (n = 4– 6 biological replicates) ± SE. The relative
abundance of individual compounds is given as weight %. The total amount of fatty acids is
given in µmol g−1 dry weight. Different letters in rows indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05.
wolfpsort.seq.cbrc.jp/) prediction algorithms. Laccaria bicolor
S238N-H82-derived sequences were used for BLAST analysis
of the expressed sequence tag (EST) database available at INRA
Laccaria DB (A. Kohler, unpublished).
Phylogenetic analysis
The protein sequences of fungal FASs were phylogenetically
analysed using the arb program (Ludwig et al., 2004). Alignments were constructed using ClustalX (Thompson et al.,
1997) and manually edited over the arb alignment interface.
Ambiguous alignment positions were excluded from the phylogenetic analysis and a 50% similarity filter was set. To estimate
phylogenetic relationships, alignments were analysed using the
protein maximum likelihood program including a hidden
Markov model (Felsenstein & Churchill, 1996). No outgroup
sequence was used.
© The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation © New Phytologist (2009)
Results
An inventory of FAs in L. bicolor and its host P. menziesii
In L. bicolor, 19 different FAs were detected (Table 1; see also
Fig. S1 for GC/FID profiles). Their chain lengths varied from
14 to 24 carbon (C) atoms. The FAs 14:0 and 15:0 were only
found in free-living mycelium, whereas all other FAs also
occurred in sporocarps (not shown). The most abundant FAs
were palmitic acid 16:0, oleic acid 18:1(9Z) and linoleic acid
18:2(9Z,12Z) contributing 14, 27 and 50%, respectively, to the
total amount of FAs present in the mycelium (Table 1).
With the exception of 14:0 and 15:0, all FAs detected in the
fungus were also present in roots of uninoculated as well as
aseptically grown Douglas-fir (not shown). However, overall FA
concentrations in roots from uninoculated plants were significantly lower than those in fungal tissues (Table 1). In comparison with roots, fungal tissues contained higher concentrations
New Phytologist (2009) 182: 950–964
www.newphytologist.org
953
124
954 Research
of the unsaturated FAs 18:1(9Z) and 18:2(9Z,12Z), respectively.
Roots contained seven additional FAs not present in fungal
tissues. Among these, 14-Me-16:0 was the most abundant
(6%). Three root-specific unsaturated FAs (taxoleic acid
(18:2(5Z,9Z)), pinolenic acid (18:3(5Z,9Z,12Z)) and sciadonic
acid (20:3(5Z,11Z,14Z))) contributed 0.9, 3.8 and 4.3%,
respectively, to the total amount of FAs. All four of these
FAs are typical components of gymnosperm lipids (Wolff
et al., 1997a,b). Di-carboxylic acids of 18:0, 20:0 and 22:0
FAs have been found in tree species before (Wolff et al., 1997a)
and contributed together about 9.3% to root FA content
(Table 1).
Ectomycorrhizas showed a mixed FA pattern containing all
root-specific FAs but lacking 14:0, 15:0 and 20:1(11Z) and
21:0; that is, compounds that were only present at very low
concentrations in fungal tissues and just above the detection
limit in roots (Table 1). This suggests that these FAs were diluted
in ectomycorrhizas to below the detection limit.
Based on the decreases in six of the root-specific FAs (see
above) in mycorrhizas (Table 1), one can estimate that the contributions of root and fungal tissues in the harvested ectomycorrhizas were about 66 and 34%, respectively. A notable
exception was the root-specific taxoleic acid, which was actually
slightly increased in ectomycorrhizas (Table 1).
In our search for ectomycorrhiza-specific changes in FAs, we
compared the relative abundance of FAs in the different tissues.
Ectomycorrhizas were significantly enriched in palmitvaccenic
acid (16:1(11Z); 5.4-fold) and linoleic acid (18:2(9Z,12Z);
2.2-fold). Linoleic acid (18:2(9Z,12Z)) was the most abundant
FA in both Douglas-fir and L. bicolor and showed a strong
decline with increasing age in the latter organism (Fig. S2). By
contrast, palmitvaccenic acid (16:1(11Z)) was among the rarest
of the root FAs (0.05%), displayed the highest absolute and
relative enrichment factors in ectomycorrhizas and showed no
age-dependent changes in mycelium (Fig. S2).
To analyse the lipid classes that constituted the membranes
of L. bicolor, lipid extracts from 14-d-old mycelium were fractionated into neutral lipids, glycolipids and phospholipids,
respectively, and separated by TLC (Fig. 1). The fraction of
neutral lipids consisted of free sterols, sterol esters and free FAs
as well as mono-, di- and triacylglycerols. The fraction of glycolipids consisted of acylated and nonacylated sterol glycosides
and another glycolipid with chromatographic properties similar
to either a diglycosyl diacylglycerol or a diglycosyl sterol (Fig. 1;
DGDG). The fraction of phospholipids consisted of phosphatidic
acid, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylinositol. Taken together, these
results show that lipids harbouring esterified FAs constituted
a major proportion of the lipid fraction of L. bicolor.
The gene catalogue of FA metabolism
We annotated 63 genes of lipid metabolism belonging to 33
gene families. Among the annotated genes, 71% belonged to
New Phytologist (2009) 182: 950–964
www.newphytologist.org
Fig. 1 Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) analysis of different lipid
classes isolated from the lipid fraction of Laccaria bicolor. The lipids
were extracted from lyophilized fungal material (50 mg) fractionated
by solid phase extraction (SPE) into different lipid classes and
analysed by TLC as described in the Materials and Methods. DAG,
diacylglycerol; FFA, free fatty acids; MAG, monoacylglycerol; S, free
sterol; SE, sterol ester; TAG, triacylglycerol; ASG, acylated sterol
glycoside; GC, glucosyl ceramide; SG, sterol glycoside; DGDG,
diglycosyl diacylglycerol (tentative); PA, phosphatidic acid;
PC, phosphatidyl choline; PE, phosphatidyl ethanolamine;
PI, phosphatidyl inositol; PS, phosphatidyl serine.
multigene families consisting of up to five members, which
were, however, not clustered (Table 2). All enzymes needed for
FA biosynthesis and seven gene families for FA modification
processes, such as desaturation, were found. Sixteen gene families
were found for β-oxidation (Table 2). Furthermore, five gene
families were annotated for reactions involved in the glyoxylate
and citrate cycle (for detailed annotation and information on
carbohydrate metabolism, see Deveau et al. 2008). Sixty-six per
cent of all annotated genes showed EST evidence (Table 2). For
five genes alternative splicing was detected.
To determine whether annotated functional genes of FA
metabolism were expressed, transcript profiling was conducted
in mycelium and ectomycorrhizas of L. bicolor using WGEO
arrays (Tables 3, 4). Predicted functional genes showed signal
intensities well above the cut-off level, whereas gene models
considered as pseudogenes showed zero or weak signal intensity
within the range of the background signal. Four gene models for
FA biosynthesis and one for FA degradation were not represented
on the array (Tables 3, 4). The transcription of several genes
for FA biosynthesis was decreased or remained unaffected in
ectomycorrhizas compared with mycelium (Table 3). A
putative 3-ketoacyl reductase that may be involved in the
interconversion of acetoacetate and 3-hydroxy butyrate was
the only gene whose relative transcript abundance increased
in ectomycorrhizas compared with mycelium (Table 3).
Among 33 genes related to FA degradation, the expression of
carnitine/acylcarnitine translocase (CACT) and 3-ketoacyl-CoA
thiolase (KCT) was suppressed and that of acylcarnitine
transferase I (ACT I) was increased in ectomycorrhizas compared
with mycelium (Table 4).
© The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation © New Phytologist (2009)
125
Research
Table 2 The annotated gene families of lipid metabolism in Laccaria bicolor S238N
Putative function
Fatty acid biosynthesis
Acetyl-CoA carboxylase
Acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase
FA-synthase
FA-synthase
FA-synthase
FA-synthase
FA-synthase
3-ketoacyl reductase
Acyl carrier protein
Fatty acid desaturation and modification
3-ketoacyl-CoA synthase
(FA-elongation enzyme; ELO type)
Long-chain FA-CoA ligase
Δ9-FA-desaturase
Δ9-FA-desaturase
Δ9-FA-desaturase
Δ9-FA-desaturase
Δ9-FA-desaturase
Δ12-FA-desaturase
Δ12-FA-desaturase
Δ12-FA-desaturase
Δ12-FA-desaturase
Δ12-FA-desaturase
Δ15-FA-desaturase
Cytochrome b5 protein
Cytochrome b5 reductase
β-oxidation (mitochondria)
Acylcarnitine transferase
Acylcarnitine transferase
Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase
Carnitine/acylcarnitine translocase
Carnitine/acylcarnitine translocase
Enoyl-CoA hydratase
Enoyl-CoA hydratase
Long-chain FA-CoA ligase
3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase
3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase
3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase
3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase
β-oxidation (peroxisomes)
Acetylcarnitine transferase 1
Acetylcarnitine transferase 2
Acyl-CoA oxidase
Acyl-CoA oxidase*
Acyl-CoA oxidase*
Acyl-CoA oxidase*
Long-chain FA-CoA ligase
D-multifunctional β-oxidation protein
Peroxisomal long-chain FA import protein 1
Peroxisomal long-chain FA import protein 2
Δ2.4-dienoyl-CoA reductase
3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase
3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase
3-hydroxy-2-methylbutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase
Δ3,Δ2-enoyl-CoA isomerase
Δ3,5,Δ2,4-dienoyl-CoA isomerase
Δ3,5,Δ2,4-dienoyl-CoA isomerase
© The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation © New Phytologist (2009)
EC number
Localization
Protein ID
EST
PG
AS
Localization
EC 6.4.1.2
EC 23.1.9
EC 2.3.1.86
EC 2.3.1.86
EC 2.3.1.86
EC 2.3.1.86
EC 2.3.1.86
EC 1.1.1.100
Scaffold 2
Scaffold 9
Scaffold 11
Scaffold 5
Scaffold 57
Scaffold 25
Scaffold 7
Scaffold 57
Scaffold 1
187554
166928
296983
314211
313054
330158
399323
255231
164630
y
y
y
n
n
n
n
y
y
n
n
n
y
y
y
y
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
y
C
C
C
–
–
–
–
C
C
Scaffold 1
186873
y
n
n
ER
Scaffold 9
Scaffold 1
Scaffold 8
Scaffold 27
Scaffold 31
Scaffold 79
Scaffold 3
Scaffold 41
Scaffold 51
Scaffold 23
Scaffold 47
Scaffold 3
Scaffold 4
Scaffold 1
319094
301202
189797
295043
399315
399316
292603
309734
254799
303237
399320
245369
183113
300832
y
n
y
y
n
n
y
n
n
n
n
y
y
y
n
n
n
n
y
y
n
n
n
y
y
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
C
ER
ER
ER
ER
ER
ER
ER
ER
ER
ER
ER
C
C
Scaffold 6
Scaffold 11
Scaffold 25
Scaffold 1
Scaffold 5
Scaffold 10
Scaffold 4
Scaffold 9
Scaffold 38
Scaffold 1
Scaffold 2
Scaffold 4
189447
184843
191220
301012
183526
234621
245955
319094
185981
300690
187873
168519
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
y
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
y
n
n
n
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
C
M
M
M
M
Scaffold 3
Scaffold 2
Scaffold 9
Scaffold 11
Scaffold 11
Scaffold 25
Scaffold 6
Scaffold 11
188234
244106
319093
190411
190400
320108
189537
234865
y
y
n
y
y
y
y
y
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
y
y
n
n
n
n
n
n
P (PTS1)
C
P (PTS1)
P (PTS1)
P (PTS1)
P (PTS1)
P (PTS1)
P (PTS1)
Scaffold 1
Scaffold 4
Scaffold 19
Scaffold 1
Scaffold 4
Scaffold 24
Scaffold 8
Scaffold 19
Scaffold 52
242594
141760
251259
301021
311721
320095
325594
300535
312422
y
n
n
n
y
n
n
n
y
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
y
n
n
n
n
n
P–
P–
P (PTS1)
P (PTS2)
P (PTS1)
P (PTS1)
P (PTS1)
P (PTS1)
P (PTS1)
EC 6.2.1.3
EC 1.14
EC 1.14
EC 1.14
EC 1.14
EC 1.14
EC 1.14.19
EC 1.14.19
EC 1.14.19
EC 1.14.19
EC 1.14.19
EC 1.14.19
EC 1.6.2.2
EC 2.3.1.7
EC 2.3.1.7
EC 1.3.99.13
EC 4.2.1.17
EC 4.2.1.17
EC 6.2.1.3
EC 2.3.1.16
EC 2.3.1.16
EC 1.1.1.35
EC 1.1.1.35
EC 2.3.1.7
EC 2.3.1.7
EC 1.3.3.6
EC 1.3.3.6
EC 1.3.3.6
EC 1.3.3.6
EC 6.2.1.3
EC 4.2.1 +
EC 1.1.1.35
EC 1.3.1.34
EC 2.3.1.16
EC 2.3.1.16
EC 1.1.1.178
EC 4.2.1.17
EC 5.3.3
EC 5.3.3
New Phytologist (2009) 182: 950–964
www.newphytologist.org
955
126
956 Research
Table 2 continued
Putative function
EC number
Localization
Protein ID
EST
PG
AS
Localization
Catalase
NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase
NAD-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase
Glyoxylate cycle
Aconitase
Aconitase
Aconitase
Citrate synthase
Isocitrate lyase
Malate dehydrogenase
Malate synthase
EC 1.11.1.6
EC 1.1.1.42
EC 1.1.1.41
Scaffold 68
Scaffold 7
Scaffold 4
123238
317084
311861
y
y
y
n
n
n
n
n
n
P (PTS1)
P (PTS1)
P (PTS1)
EC 4.2.1.3
EC 4.2.1.3
EC 4.2.1.3
EC 2.3.3.1
EC 4.1.3.1
EC 1.1.1.37
EC 2.3.3.9
Scaffold 6
Scaffold 8
Scaffold 83
Scaffold 11
Scaffold 3
Scaffold 9
Scaffold 5
189452
291064
397786
297019
171643
326114
314107
y
y
n
y
y
y
y
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
C
C
C
P (PTS2)
P (PTS1)
P (PTS1)
P (PTS2)
*Contains an N terminal cytochrome b5 domain.
Localization of enzymes was predicted as described in the Materials and Methods (C, cytosol; ER, endoplasmatic reticulum; M, mitochondrion;
PM, plasma membrane; P, peroxisome; PTS1/2, sequence contains peroxisomal target sequence 1/2; –, truncated sequence or not predictable).
FA, fatty acid; EST, expressed sequence tag (y, yes; n, no); PG, pseudogene; AS, alternative splicing.
Table 3 Expression analysis of annotated genes of the fatty acid (FA) biosynthesis pathway in ectomycorrhizas (EM) and free-living mycelium
of Laccaria bicolor strain S238N
Putative function
Scaffold
Protein ID
Signal intensity
of transcript
Log2 transcript ratio
EM/mycelium
P-value
Acetyl-CoA carboxylase
Acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase
FA-synthase
FA-synthase
FA-synthase
FA-synthase
FA-synthase
Δ9-FA-desaturase
Δ9-FA-desaturase
Δ9-FA-desaturase
Δ9-FA-desaturase
Δ9-FA-desaturase
Δ12-FA-desaturase
Δ12-FA-desaturase
Δ12-FA-desaturase
Δ12-FA-desaturase
Δ12-FA-desaturase
Δ15-FA-desaturase
3-ketoacyl-CoA synthase
FA-elongation enzyme (ELO type)
3-ketoacyl reductase
Acyl carrier protein
Long-chain FA-CoA ligase
Cytochrome b5 protein
Cytochrome b5 reductase
2
9
11
25
5
57
7
1
27
8
31
79
51
23
3
41
47
3
1
187554
166928
296983
330158
314211
313054
399323
301202
295043
189797
399315
399316
254799
303237
292603
309734
399320
245369
186873
22288
3533
41552
0
0
0
No#
2720
44026
14616
No#
No#
2330
0
57915
3202
No#
7246
39429
−2.03
−0.07
−2.32
0.03
1
0.07
+0.92
−0.23
−3.47
0.15
0.20
0.02
+0.29
0.78
−0.32
+1.17
0.50
0.05
−1.05
−0.13
0.12
0.66
57
1
9
4
1
255231
164630
319094
183113
300832
2193
46644
15403
23363
21125
+2.82
−0.67
−1.16
−0.10
−1.04
0.03
0.20
0.10
0.62
0.01
Ectomycorrhizas were collected from L. bicolor-inoculated Douglas-fir seedlings. Mycelium of L. bicolor was cultured axenically. For each gene,
its putative function, the scaffold containing the gene model sequence, the protein ID, and the mean signal intensity of mRNA from mycelium
of L. bicolor are indicated. Relative changes in transcript signal intensities of ectomycorrhizas/mycelium are expressed as log2-transformed data.
Data are the means of three biological replicates. P-values ≤ 0.05 indicate significant changes (bold typeface) in the relative transcript abundance
in ectomycorrhizas relative to free-living mycelium. For details, see the Materials and Methods.
No#, no oligonucleotides present on whole-genome expression oligoarray (WGEO).
New Phytologist (2009) 182: 950–964
www.newphytologist.org
© The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation © New Phytologist (2009)
127
Research
Table 4 Expression analysis of annotated genes of the fatty acid (FA) catabolism in ectomycorrhizas (EM) and free-living mycelium of Laccaria
bicolor strain S238N
Putative function
Mitochondria
Acylcarnitine transferase
Acylcarnitine transferase
Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase
Carnitine/acylcarnitine translocase
Carnitine/acylcarnitine translocase
Enoyl-CoA hydratase
Enoyl-CoA hydratase
Long-chain FA-CoA ligase
3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase
3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase
3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase
3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase
Peroxisomes
Acetylcarnitine transferase 1
Acetylcarnitine transferase 2
Acyl-CoA oxidase
Acyl-CoA oxidase
Acyl-CoA oxidase
Acyl-CoA oxidase
Long-chain FA-CoA ligase
D-multifunctional β-oxidation protein
Peroxisomal long-chain FA
Import protein 1
Peroxisomal long-chain FA
Import protein 2
Δ2,4-dienoyl-CoA reductase
3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase
3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase
3-hydroxy-2-methylbutyryl
-CoA-dehydrogenase
Δ3,Δ2-enoyl-CoA isomerase
Δ3,5,Δ2,4-dienoyl-CoA-isomerase
Δ3,5,Δ2,4-dienoyl-CoA-isomerase
Catalase
NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase
NAD-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase
Scaffold
Protein ID
Signal intensity
of transcript
Log2 transcript ratio
EM/mycelium
P-value
6
11
25
1
5
10
4
9
38
1
2
4
189447
184843
191220
301012
183526
234621
245955
319094
185981
300690
187873
168519
7756
522
10974
16594
16972
42118
2269
15403
4331
1490
17086
No#
+0.67
−0.64
−0.74
−0.55
−0.57
−0.53
−0.68
−1.16
+2.24
+0.53
+0.62
0.31
0.51
0.33
0.26
0.02
0.18
0.22
0.10
0.11
0.35
0.19
3
2
9
11
11
25
6
11
1
188234
244106
319093
190411
190400
320108
189537
234865
242594
6486
25232
12203
16777
17307
9386
8455
27842
25413
+2.44
+0.04
−1.56
−0.55
−0.13
+0.13
+0.11
−0.01
−0.40
0.03
1.00
0.20
0.66
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.47
4
141760
0
19
1
4
251259
301021
311721
8447
16954
22397
+1.31
−0.55
−0.54
0.23
0.38
0.05
24
8
19
52
68
7
4
320095
325594
300535
312422
123238
317084
311861
16327
706
12697
6600
14515
22310
34574
+0.20
−0.26
+1.22
+0.72
−2.00
−0.70
−0.23
0.89
0.69
0.16
0.27
0.55
0.36
0.40
Ectomycorrhizas were collected from L. bicolor-inoculated Douglas-fir seedlings. Mycelium of L. bicolor was cultured axenically. For each gene,
its putative function, the scaffold containing the gene model sequence, the protein ID, and the mean signal intensity of mRNA from mycelium
of L. bicolor are indicated. Relative changes in transcript signal intensities of ectomycorrhizas/mycelium are expressed as log2-transformed data.
Data are the means of three biological replicates. P-values ≤ 0.05 indicate significant changes (bold typeface) in the relative transcript abundance
in ectomycorrhizas relative to free-living mycelium. For details, see the Materials and Methods.
No#, no oligonucleotides present on whole-genome expression oligoarray (WGEO).
Reconstruction of the pathway of FA biosynthesis in
L. bicolor
Using the FA composition, gene annotation and expression
analysis of FA biosynthetic genes, we constructed a pathway for
FA biosynthesis and modification in L. bicolor (Fig. 2, Table 3).
This pathway starts with the production of palmitic acid (16:0)
or perhaps to a small extent with myristic acid (14:0) because
traces of this compound were present in the mycelium (Table 1,
Fig. S1). FA biosynthesis takes place in the cytosol, as is the
© The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation © New Phytologist (2009)
case for vertebrate and fungal FA biosynthesis (Lomakin et al.,
2007). Palmitic acid is synthesized in a stepwise fashion by
two enzymatic complexes: the ‘activating’ ACC and the FAS,
which adds in each internal cycle two carbon atoms to the
growing carbon chain from malonyl-CoA. For ACC, only a
single gene model was identified and curated in the draft
genome. WGEO indicated that transcripts for both genes were
expressed in free-living mycelium and ectomycorrhizas (Table 3).
However, ACC was strongly suppressed in ectomycorrhizas
relative to mycelium (Table 3). In contrast to mammalian FAS,
New Phytologist (2009) 182: 950–964
www.newphytologist.org
957
128
958 Research
Fig. 2 Fatty acid (FA) biosynthesis pathway in
Laccaria bicolor. All FAs detected by gas
chromatography/flame ionization detection
(GC/FID) analysis are included. In total, 10
different protein families are needed for the
complete modification process. α-ox., unknown
α-oxidation enzyme; Δ9, Δ9-FA-desaturase;
Δ11, Δ11-FA-desaturase (tentative); Δ12,
Δ12-FA-desaturase; Δ13, Δ13-FA-desaturase
(tentative); Δ14, Δ14-FA-desaturase
(tentative); Δ15, Δ15-FA-desaturase;
ELO, FA-elongase.
the FAS from L. bicolor does not contain a thioesterase domain
(Fig. 3). Therefore, the products released from this fungal FAS
are probably acyl-CoAs. In addition, an acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase
was identified that may be involved in sterol metabolism, but
the function of the cytosolic acyl carrier protein (ACP) remains
to be clarified.
The FAS gene family consists of five members. However, only
one member of this family encoded a protein that contained
all catalytic activities necessary for the internal cycle adding two
C atoms to the growing fatty acid chain. This FAS gene was the
only one for which EST supports existed (Table 2) and it was
the only one with transcript levels significantly above the detection limit (Table 3). It is not yet clear whether the other genes
are truncated sequences or code only for certain subunits or
activities that may be part of an additional mitochondrial FAS.
As their transcripts were below the detection limit under normal
metabolic conditions, it is unlikely that they have functions in
FA biosynthesis, although we cannot exclude their involvement
as the metabolic rate of mitochondrial FAS may be low.
The product of FAS, palmitic acid, is modified by adding
two C-atoms by an elongation step (ELO-type; Leonard et al.,
2004), by introduction of double bonds in the carbon C-chain
by desaturases (Shanklin & Cahoon, 1998), and by shortening
of the chain by one C-unit to yield uneven-numbered C chains.
To synthesize the entire set of FAs, three different enzyme
families are needed: desaturases, elongases and an α-oxidation
system. For the first group of enzymes, in total 11 genes were
annotated: five FA-Δ9-desaturases, five FA-Δ12-desaturases and
one FA-Δ15-desaturase. However, among these genes, two Δ9and two Δ12-desaturases were annotated as pseudogenes; they
showed no expression on WGEO and lacked EST support
(Tables 2, 3). Furthermore, one 3-ketoacyl-CoA synthase (KS)
as a subunit of an ELO-type FA elongase was annotated
(Tables 2, 3). However, we failed to identify additional com-
New Phytologist (2009) 182: 950–964
www.newphytologist.org
ponents of this complex. While an elongase complex is required
for stepwise extension of the 16-C chain to 24-C, we were not
able to identify the enzymes involved in α-oxidation that are
necessary to yield the uneven-numbered FA C chains with 15C, 21-C and 23-C atoms, respectively. From these results the
pathway of FA biosynthesis shown in Fig. 2 was constructed.
From sequence data it was not possible to identify putative
Δ11-desaturases, which are required for formation of 16:1(11Z)
and 18:1(11Z). As we found three Δ9-desaturases, it is possible
that one of them acted as a Δ11-desaturase or that desaturation
at Δ11 occurs as a side activity of Δ9-desaturases (Fig. 2).
Phylogenetic analysis of FAS
FAS is encoded by one remarkably large gene, which is translated
into the second-largest protein so far recognized in L. bicolor
(3935 aa). In fungi, the FAS complex usually consists of eight
enzymatic activities, including phosphopantetheinyl transferase
(PPT) (Jenni et al., 2006). However, the structures of FAS differ
in different kingdoms. In bacteria and plants, all activities are
encoded by distinct genes building a multienzyme complex of
seven subunits (without PPT). In vertebrates and humans, all
required FAS domains are found in one gene (Schweizer &
Hofmann, 2004), as in L. bicolor. However, our analysis of
several other basidiomycetes and ascomycetes whose sequences
have been published (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/, http://www.
yeastgenome.org/ and http://www.broad.mit.edu/) showed
that fungi have no common FAS structure and that there are
differences even in the group of basidiomycetes. A monomeric
FAS protein such as that in L. bicolor was also encoded in
C. cinerea (TS.ccin_1.191.21), P. chrysosporium (136804) and
U. maydis (UM0297.1), whereas the basidiomycete C. neoformans (CNAG_02100.1, CNAG_02099.1) and the ascomycetes
Neurospora crassa (NCU07307.3, NCU07308.3), Saccharomyces
© The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation © New Phytologist (2009)
129
Research
Fig. 3 Linear arrangement of functional
domains of the fatty acid synthase (FAS)
polypeptide of seven related fungi (top) and
their phylogenetic relations based on the
β-subunit of FAS (bottom). A, ascomycetes;
B1 and B2, basidiomycetes with differences in
the coding of the subunits of FAS. The following
fungi (accession number) were analysed:
Aspergillus nidulans (Broad Institute:
AN9408.3); Coprinopsis cinerea (Broad
Institute: TS.ccin_1.191.21); Cryptococcus
neoformans (Broad Institute: CNAG_02099.1);
Laccaria bicolor (Joint Genome Institute (JGI):
296983); Neurospora crassa (Broad Institute:
NCU07307.3); Phanerochaete chrysosporum
(JGI: 136804); Saccharomyces cerevisiae
(SGD: YKL182W); Ustilago maydis (Broad
Institute: UM0297.1). AT, acetyl-CoA-ACP
transacetylase; ER, β-enoyl reductase; DH,
3-hydroxyacyl-ACP dehydratase; MT,
malonyl-CoA-ACP transacylase; ACP, acyl
carrier protein; KR, 3-ketoacyl reductase;
KS, 3-ketoacyl synthase; PPT,
phosphopantetheinyl transferase.
cerevisiae (YKL182W, YPL231W) and Aspergillus nidulans
(AN9407.3, AN9408.3) encoded the eight enzyme domains
in two genes, building a multienzyme complex composed of
α- and β-subunits.
As the gene structure of FAS differs among fungi, three
different phylogenetic analyses were conducted employing: (1)
sequences of the β-subunit (including acetyl-CoA-ACP transacetylase, β-enoyl reductase, 3-ketoacyl-ACP dehydratase and
malonyl-CoA-ACP transacylase), (2) sequences of the α-subunit
(including 3-ketoacyl-ACP reductase, 3-ketoacyl-ACP synthase,
phosphopantetheinyl transferase and in some organisms acyl
carrier protein) and (3) merged sequences of the α- and βsubunits. The three calculated trees were similar (data not
shown) and confirmed the typical phylogenetic positions of
basidiomycetes and ascomycetes (Fig. 3). Laccaria bicolor and
C. cinerea formed a subgroup relatively close to P. chrysosporium
(Fig. 3). Phylogenetically, the β-subunit sequences of these
three fungi were more closely related to that of C. neoformans
(in which FAS is encoded by two genes) than to that of U. maydis
(in which FAS is encoded by one gene). The ascomycetes
formed their own subgroup, with N. crassa and A. nidulans
more closely related to each other than to S. cerevisiae.
Furthermore, the linear arrangement of the functional
domains of the FAS polypeptide differed among the fungi
© The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation © New Phytologist (2009)
encoding this complex in two proteins. In C. neoformans the ACP
is encoded by the gene of the β-subunit, whereas in the ascomycetes ACP is encoded by the gene of the α-subunit (Fig. 3).
FA degradation
Based on predicted target sequences, FA degradation by the βoxidation cycle probably took place in two different organelles
in L. bicolor (Tables 2, 4): (i) in mitochondria, as in animals
and some algae as well as in their evolutionary ancestors the
Gram-positive bacteria, and (ii) in peroxisomes, as in animals,
plants and most eukaryotic micro-organisms (Fig. 4).
The annotation of the β-oxidation enzymes and expression
analyses indicated that FA degradation involved the same steps
as reported previously for mitochondria of eukaryotic systems
and Gram-positive bacteria (Wanders & Waterham, 2006;
Graham, 2008). After being activated in the cytosol, FAs are
imported via the carnitine cycle (Fig. 4a). The degradation cycle
consists of separate enzymes, all of which were annotated and
contained predicted mitochondrial target sequences: one
acyl-CoA-dehydrogenase, two enoyl-CoA hydratases, two 3hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenases, and two 3-ketoacyl-CoA
thiolases. The electrons that derive from β-oxidation can be
transferred to the respiratory chain and acetyl-CoA can be
New Phytologist (2009) 182: 950–964
www.newphytologist.org
959
130
960 Research
metabolized via the Krebs cycle. In contrast to peroxisomes
(see next paragraph), no additional enzymes related to the βoxidation cycle were identified, suggesting that only saturated
FAs can be degraded in the mitochondria of L. bicolor. Expression
analysis of mitochondrial genes showed no significant changes
between mycelium and ectomycorrhizas, with the exception of
one gene for carnitine/acylcarnitine translocase (scaffold 5)
whose relative transcript levels were approximately 30% decreased
in ectomycorrhizas compared with mycelium (Table 4).
In the case of peroxisomes, FAs are probably first imported
via an ABC transporter and then activated in the matrix, as we
identified a peroxisomal long-chain FA-CoA ligase (Table 2).
Fig. 4 Schematic representation of possible
enzymatic reactions of the β-oxidation cycle
in peroxisomes and mitochondria of Laccaria
bicolor based on annotation and lipid profile
data. Enzymes are presented in bold typeface.
(a) In mitochondria: fatty acids (FAs) are
activated in the cytosol and transported
into the organelle via the carnitine cycle.
A four-step oxidation cycle oxidizes only
saturated FAs. The dashed array indicates that
the molecule undergoes more than one round
of the cycle for complete oxidation.
(b, c) In peroxisomes: FAs are imported into
the organelle via an ABC transporter and then
activated. Then two possible oxidation cycles
may occur, as represented in (b) and (c),
respectively. (b) A four-step cycle oxidizes
saturated FAs. Only the first enzyme differs
from the scheme in the mitochondria. The
resulting acetyl-CoA may be directly exported
either via a putative acetyl-carnitine transport
system or via the glyoxylate cycle.
Regeneration of the cofactor NAD occurs via
NAD-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase.
(c) Two out of three alternative pathways are
shown, which include auxiliary enzymes to
oxidize unsaturated FAs (B and C). ACDH,
acyl-CoA dehydrogenase; ACT, acylcarnitine
transferase; AcCT, acetylcarnitine transferase;
ACX, acyl-CoA oxidase; CACT, carnitine/
acylcarnitine translocase; DCI, Δ3,5,
Δ2,4-dienoyl-CoA isomerase; DCR,
2,4-dienoyl-CoA reductase; ECH, enoyl-CoA
hydratase; IDH, isocitrate dehydrogenase;
HCDH, 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase;
KCT, 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase; LACS,
long-chain FA-CoA ligase; MFP, peroxisomal
D-specific bifunctional protein harbouring
hydratase-dehydrogenase activities; PXA,
peroxisomal long-chain FA import protein
(ABC transporter).
New Phytologist (2009) 182: 950–964
www.newphytologist.org
© The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation © New Phytologist (2009)
131
Research
Fig. 4 continued
The following genes encoding enzymes for β-oxidation contained putative peroxisomal target sequences: four acyl-CoA
oxidases, one multifunctional β-oxidation protein (harbouring
enoyl-CoA hydratase and 3D-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase) and three 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolases. One catalase was
annotated. In addition, four further enzyme families were
identified, two 3,5-2,6-dienoyl-CoA isomerases, one 2,4dienoyl-CoA reductase, one 3-hydroxy-2-methylbutyrylCoA dehydrogenase and one 3,2-trans-enoyl-CoA isomerase,
allowing L. bicolor to degrade not only saturated FAs (Fig. 4b),
but also mono- and polyunsaturated FAs (Fig. 4c). For double bonds at odd numbers, two degradation pathways exist;
one involves only the Δ3,Δ2-trans-enoyl-CoA isomerase in
addition to the four standard activities (Fig. 4c, pathway B)
and the other involves three additional auxiliary enzymes:
Δ3,5,Δ2,4-dienoyl-CoA isomerase, Δ2,4-dienoyl-CoA reductase
and Δ3,Δ2-trans-enoyl-CoA isomerase (pathway not shown).
In the case of double bonds at even numbers, one pathway
exists. It involves Δ2,4-dienoyl-CoA reductase and Δ3,Δ2trans-enoyl-CoA isomerase (Fig. 4c, pathway C). The electrons that derive from β-oxidation are being transmitted (1)
to oxygen, in the case of acyl-CoA oxidase, or (2) to the NAD+
that is being recycled by a peroxisomal NAD+-dependent
isocitrate dehydrogenase, in the case of the dehydrogenase
activity of the multifunctional protein (van Roermund et al.,
1998). The acetyl-CoA formed is either metabolized via
the glyoxylate cycle or directly exported to the cytosol via a
© The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation © New Phytologist (2009)
putative carnitine cycle (Fig. 4b). Acetylcarnitine transferase,
which mediates cytosolic export, was the only gene involved
in FA degradation whose expression was significantly increased
in ectomycorrhizas compared with mycelium (Table 4).
With the exception of 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase (scaffold 4),
whose relative transcript level decreased, the expression of
all other genes of FA degradation in peroxisomes remained
unaffected in ectomycorrhizas compared with mycelium
(Table 4).
Discussion
Distribution of lipids in L. bicolor
The FA pattern of L. bicolor was composed of 19 components,
most of which were also detected in ectomycorrhizas (Table 1,
Fig. S2). The FA patterns appear to be species-specific, as
different fungal species were distinguished by their lipid composition (Martin et al., 1984; Ruess et al., 2002). Laccaria bicolor/
P. menziesii ectomycorrhizas (this study), as well as Pisolithus
tinctorius/Pinus sylvestris ectomycorrhizas (Laczko et al., 2003),
showed a more diverse FA pattern than free-living mycelium.
However, this was caused by the presence of additional FAs
of plant origin. In both P. tinctorius and L. bicolor, the most
abundant FAs were palmitic acid (16:0), oleic acid (18:1(9Z))
and linoleic acid (18:2(9Z,12Z)). As FA composition follows
taxonomy, this is characteristic not only of other ectomycorrhizal
New Phytologist (2009) 182: 950–964
www.newphytologist.org
961
132
962 Research
fungi (Martin et al., 1984; Pedneault et al., 2006), but also of
many other fungi (van der Westhuizen et al., 1994).
Interestingly, P. tinctorius (Laczko et al., 2003), L. bicolor (this
study) and Paxillus involutus (C. Göbel,unpublished data) were
found to contain palmitvaccenic acid 16:1(11Z), an FA that
is enriched in arbuscular mycorrhiza, and has been used as a
maker for mycorrhizal colonization (Bååth, 2003; van Aarle
& Olsson, 2003; Stumpe et al., 2005; Trépanier et al., 2005).
This FA was absent in the lipid fraction of the host plant of
P. tinctorius, Pinus sylvestris (Laczko et al., 2003), whereas we
detected small amounts of this FA in Douglas-fir roots, even
in seedlings raised under sterile conditions (not shown). However,
it should be noted that the occurrence of 16:1(11Z) seems to
be restricted to the genus Pseudotsuga, as revealed by a screening
of 100 different tree species (C. Göbel et al., unpublished results).
The formation of Δ11-FA in L. bicolor remains unclear.
16:1(11Z) could be an unspecific by-product of 16:1(9Z)
formation. In this case, we would expect a constant ratio of
16:1(9Z) and 16:1(11Z), assuming the same turnover of both
FAs. However, the ratio changed because the concentration of
(9Z) decreased in older tissues while the amount of (11Z)
remained almost constant (Fig. S2). It is unlikely that this FA
derives from elongation of 14:1(9Z), as we did not find any
14:1(9Z). It is, therefore, likely that one of the three genes
annotated as Δ9-desaturases may act as Δ11-desaturase. This will
require further analysis.
FA biosynthesis
We annotated five gene families that are involved in FA biosynthesis. In most organisms, FAs are synthesized from acetyland malonyl-CoA by a reaction sequence consisting of seven
catalytic steps (Berg et al., 2006). In most bacteria and plants,
these enzyme activities are encoded by distinct genes, but in
fungi and vertebrates this biosynthetic pathway is catalysed by
a large multifunctional protein (Jenni et al., 2007). Previously,
it was assumed that this protein forms a homodimer (type I)
in mammals and consists of a heterododecameric complex in
fungi (type II; Schweizer & Hofmann, 2004). In contrast to
this model, we found that several species of the Basidiomycotina
harbour the classical yeast-like type II FAS, but L. bicolor,
U. maydis and C. cinerea have a vertebrate-like type I FAS
(Fig. 3). The three fungal species represent symbiotic, biotrophic, and saprophytic life styles, respectively. Some fungal
species show a niche-dependent adaptation of FA biosynthesis.
For example, Malassezia globosa is strictly dependent on host
lipids because there is no FAS gene in its genome (Xu et al.,
2007). Although L. bicolor – at least in symbiosis – mainly relies
on its host for its carbon resource, a reduction in the number
of genes coding for enzymes of FA biosynthesis was not observed,
as all genes required at least for cytosolic FA biosynthesis were
present (Tables 2, 3). However, we observed a suppression of
ACC transcription in ectomycorrhizas compared with freeliving mycelium (Table 3). As ACC activity is required at the
New Phytologist (2009) 182: 950–964
www.newphytologist.org
start of FA synthesis, suppression of this activity may be a reason
for the decreased concentrations of FAs in ectomycorrhizas
compared with mycelium (Table 1). This theory is also supported by the fact that there was no evidence for increased
lipid degradation in ectomycorrhizas (Table 4). Johansson et al.
(2004) also reported a decreased expression of some fungal genes
related to lipid metabolism in the Paxillus involutus/Betula
pendula symbiosis. Whether the life style of L. bicolor – free-living
or in symbosis – is an important determinant for the activation
of FA biosynthesis will require further experiments.
In addition to the basic set of enzymes necessary for FA production, we found modifying enzymes whose activities resulted
in a substantial pool of different FAs (Fig. 2). These genes
were expressed in ectomycorrhizas as well as in mycelium. This
indicates that, in contrast to Glomus species, whose FAS appears
to be active only in the intraradical and not in the extraradical
mycelium (Trépanier et al., 2005), L. bicolor can synthesize
palmitic acid (16:0) and derived FAs in all tissues. Such
differences in FA metabolism may partly explain the strict
obligate biotrophism of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi compared
with the more flexible life style of ectomycorrhizal species.
An important difference between mycelium and ectomycorrhizas was an approximately 7-fold reduction in the abundance of 18:1(9Z) in the latter tissue. This cannot be explained
by a ‘dilution’ effect attributable to plant tissues but suggests
either a decrease in Δ9-FA desaturase activity or an increased
modification of 18:1(9Z). Our data seem to support the first
hypothesis. As the expression of Δ9-FA desaturase with protein
ID 189797 was strongly suppressed, this enzyme may be the
major one required for 18:1(9Z) formation.
FA degradation
The organization of the β-oxidation cycle differs among plants,
animals and fungi (Berg et al., 2006). In plants and yeast it is
only found in peroxisomes or glyoxysomes. In animals the
classical β-oxidation cycle takes place in the mitochondria,
whereas peroxisomes harbour only a special β-oxidation system
for the degradation of either very long chain or branched chain
FAs. Here we provide evidence that, in L. bicolor, β-oxidation
cycle enzymes are targeted to mitochondria as well as to peroxisomes. Both organelles are involved in FA catabolism in filamentous ascomycetes, basidiomycetes, zygomycetes and oomycetes,
with some exceptions (Cornell et al., 2007). In these microorganisms, the mitochondrial cycle is responsible for the
breakdown of short-chain FAs while the peroxisomal cycle is
used for the degradation of long-chain FAs (Maggio-Hall &
Keller, 2004; Maggio-Hall et al., 2008). We found a similar
situation in L. bicolor, as auxiliary enzymes for the degradation
of unsaturated FAs are located exclusively in the peroxisomes.
For the two ‘starter’ enzymes of the two differently located
cycles, the mitochondrial acyl-CoA dehydrogenases and the
peroxisomal acyl-CoA oxidase, one and four gene family members were annotated, respectively. This implies that L. bicolor
© The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation © New Phytologist (2009)
133
Research
has different enzymatic specificities and can handle a broad range
of substrates of lipids. The latter function may be especially
important when L. bicolor assumes a saprophytic life style.
In addition to the β-oxidation cycle, we found all the genes
that constitute a glyoxylate cycle in L. bicolor. Therefore, the
fungus harbours peroxisomes of a more specialized type, called
glyoxysomes, that have been described in seedlings (Graham,
2008) and other fungi before. In fungi, this cycle is important
not only for carbon source utilization, but in addition for pathogenesis, development, and secondary metabolism (Idnurm &
Howlett, 2002; Asakura et al., 2006; Hynes et al., 2008).
Overall, our analysis shows that L. bicolor contains all the
genes required for FA synthesis, modification and degradation.
Comparison of transcript analysis, lipid concentrations and
composition suggested that the amount of FAs may be regulated via ACC and the abundance of oleic acid by Δ9-FAdesaturase on scaffold 8.
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the Joint Genome Institute
and the Laccaria Genome Consortium for access to the Laccaria
genome sequence before publication. MR is supported by a
Marie Curie PhD scholarship. We are grateful to Sabine Freitag
and Pia Meier for technical assistance. This work was supported
by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. The transcript profiling was funded by INRA and the Network of Excellence
EVOLTREE.
References
van Aarle IM, Olsson PA. 2003. Fungal lipid accumulation and
development of mycelial structures by two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69: 6762–6767.
Asakura M, Okuno T, Takano Y. 2006. Multiple contributions of
peroxisomal metabolic function to fungal pathogenicity in
Colletotrichum lagenarium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology
72: 6345–6354.
Bååth E. 2003. The use of neutral lipid fatty acids to indicate the
physiological conditions of soil fungi. Microbial Ecology
45: 373–383.
Bååth E, Nilsson LO, Goransson H, Wallander H. 2004. Can the extent
of degradation of soil fungal mycelium during soil incubation be used to
estimate ectomycorrhizal biomass in soil? Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36:
2105–2109.
Bago B, Pfeffer PE, Zipfel W, Lammers P, Shachar-Hill Y. 2002a.
Tracking metabolism and imaging transport in arbuscular mycorrhizal
fungi: metabolism and transport in AM fungi. Plant and Soil
244: 189–197.
Bago B, Zipfel W, Williams R-M, Jun J, Arreola R, Lammers P-J,
Pfeffer P-E, Shachar-Hill Y. 2002b. Translocation and utilization of
fungal storage lipids in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant
Physiology 128: 108–124.
Berg J, Tymoczko J, Stryer L. 2006. Biochemistry, 6th edn. New York, NY,
USA: W. H. Freeman.
Cornell ÖJ, Alam I, Soanes DM, Wong HM, Hedeler C, Paton NW,
Rattray M, Hubbard SJ, Talbot NJ, Oliver SG. 2007. Comparative
genome analysis across a kingdom of eukaryotic organisms: specialization
and diversification in the fungi. Genome Research 17: 1809–1822.
© The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation © New Phytologist (2009)
Deveau A, Kohler A, Frey-Klett P, Martin F. 2008. The major pathways of
carbohydrate metabolism in the ectomycorrhizal basidiomycete Laccaria
bicolor S238N. New Phytologist 180: 379–390.
Di Battista C, Selosse MA, Bouchard D, Stenström E, Le Tacon F.
1996. Variations in symbiotic efficiency, phenotypic characters and
ploidy level among different isolates of the ectomycorrhizal basidiomycete
Laccaria bicolor strain S 238. Mycological Research 100: 1315–1324.
Duciç T, Parladé J, Polle A. 2008. The influence of the ectomycorrhizal
fungus Rhizopogon subareolatus on growth and nutrient element
localisation in two varieties of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var.
menziesii and var. glauca) in response to manganese stress. Mycorrhiza
18: 227–239.
Felsenstein J, Churchill GA. 1996. A Hidden Markov Model approach to
variation among sites in rate of evolution. Molecular and Biological
Evolution 13: 93–104.
Frey-Klett P, Pierrat JC, Garbaye J. 1997. Location and survival of
mycorrhiza helper Pseudomonas fluorescens during establishment of
ectomycorrhizal symbiosis between Laccaria bicolor and Douglas fir.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology 63: 139–144.
Graham IA. 2008. Seed storage oil mobilization. Annual Review in Plant
Biology 59: 115–142.
Hynes MJ, Murray SL, Khew GS, Davis MA. 2008. Genetic analysis of the
role of peroxisomes in the utilization of acetate and fatty acids in Aspergillus
nidulans. Genetics 178: 1355–1369.
Idnurm A, Howlett BJ. 2002. Isocitrate lyase is essential for pathogenicity of
the fungus Leptosphaeria maculans to canola (Brassica napus). Eukaryotic
Cell 1: 719–724.
Jenni S, Leibundgut M, Boehringer D, Frick C, Mikolasek B, Ban N. 2007.
Structure of fungal fatty acid synthase and implications for iterative
substrate shuttling. Science 316: 254–261.
Jenni S, Leibundgut M, Maier R, Ban N. 2006. Architecture of a fungal fatty
acid synthase at 5 Å resolution. Science 311: 1263–1267.
Johansson T, Le Quere A, Ahren D, Soderstrom B, Erlandsson R,
Lundeberg J, Uhlen M, Tunlid A. 2004. Transcriptional responses of
Paxillus involutus and Betula pendula during formation of ectomycorrhizal
root tissue. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions 17: 202–215.
Klose J, Kronstad JW. 2006. The multifunctional β-oxidation enzyme is
required for full symptom development by the biotrophic maize pathogen
Ustilago maydis. Eukaryotic Cell 5: 2047–2061.
Laczko E, Boller T, Wiemken V. 2003. Lipids in roots of Pinus sylvestris
seedlings and in mycelia of Pisolithus tinctorius during ectomycorrhiza
formation: changes in fatty acid and sterol composition. Plant, Cell &
Environment 27: 27– 40.
Leonard AE, Pereira SL, Sprecher H, Huang YS. 2004. Elongation of
long-chain fatty acids. Progress in Lipid Research 43: 36–54.
Lomakin IB, Xiong Y, Steitz TA. 2007. The crystal structure of yeast fatty
acid synthase, a cellular machine with eight active sites working together.
Cell 129: 319–332.
Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R, Richter L, Meier H, Yadhukumar,
Buchner A, Lai T, Steppi S, Jobb G et al. 2004. ARB: a software
environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Research 32: 1363–1371.
Maggio-Hall LA, Keller NP. 2004. Mitochondrial β-oxidation in Aspergillus
nidulans. Molecular Microbiology 54: 1173–1185.
Maggio-Hall LA, Lyne P, Wolff JA, Keller NP. 2008. A single acyl-CoA
dehydrogenase is required for catabolism of isoleucine, valine and
short-chain fatty acids in Aspergillus nidulans. Fungal Genetics and Biology
45: 180–189.
Martin F, Aerts A, Ahrén D, Brun A, Danchin EGJ, Duchaussoy F,
Gibon J, Kohler A, Lindquist E, Pereda V et al. 2008. Symbiosis insights
from the genome of the mycorrhizal basidiomycete Laccaria bicolor. Nature
452: 88–92.
Martin F, Canet D, Marchal JP, Brondeau J. 1984. In vivo
natural-abundance 13C nuclear magnetic resonance studies of living
ectomycorrhizal fungi. Observation of fatty acids in Cenococcum
graniforme and Hebeloma crustuliniforme. Plant Physiology 75: 151–153.
New Phytologist (2009) 182: 950–964
www.newphytologist.org
963
134
964 Research
Martin F, Ramstedt M, Söderhäll K. 1987. Carbon and nitrogen
metabolism in ectomycorrhizal fungi and ectomycorrhizas. Biochimie
69: 569–581.
Mekhedov S, Martinez de Ilrduya O, Ohlrogge J. 2000. Toward a functional
catalog of the plant genome. A survey of genes for lipid biosynthesis. Plant
Physiology 122: 389–401.
Miquel M, Browse J. 1992. Arabidopsis mutants deficient in polyunsaturated
fatty acid synthesis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 267: 1502–1509.
Nilsson LO, Giesler R, Baath E, Wallander H. 2005. Growth and biomass
of mycorrhizal mycelia in coniferous forests along short natural nutrient
gradients. New Phytologist 165: 613–622.
Olsson PA. 1999. Signature fatty acids provide tools for determination of the
distribution and interactions of mycorrhizal fungi in soil. FEMS
Microbiology Ecology 29: 303–310.
Pedneault K, Angers P, Gosselin A, Tweddell RJ. 2006. Fatty acid
composition of lipids from mushrooms belonging to the family Boletaceae.
Mycological Research 110: 1179–1183.
Pfaffl MW. 2001. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in
real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 29: 2002–2007.
Przybyla D, Göbel C, Imboden A, Hamberg M, Feussner I, Apel K. 2008.
Enzymatic, but not nonenzymatic, 1O2-mediated peroxidation of
polyunsaturated fatty acids forms part of the executer1-dependent stress
response program in the flu mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Journal
54: 236–248
van Roermund CW, Hettema EH, Kal AJ, van den Berg M, Tabak HF,
Wanders RJ. 1998. Peroxisomal beta-oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty
acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: isocitrate dehydrogenase provides
NADPH for reduction of double bonds at even positions.
EMBO Journal 17: 677–687.
Ruess L, Haggblom MM, Garca Zapata EJ, Dighton J. 2002. Fatty acids of
fungi and nematodes – possible biomarkers in the soil food chain? Soil
Biology & Biochemistry 34: 745–756.
Sancholle M, Dalpé Y, Grandmougin-Ferjani A. 2001. Lipids of
mycorrhizae. The Mycota 9: 63–92.
Schweizer E, Hofmann J. 2004. Microbial type I fatty acid synthases (FAS):
Major players in a network of cellular FAS systems. Microbiology and
Molecular Biology Reviews 68: 501–517.
Shanklin J, Cahoon EB. 1998. Desaturation and related modifications of
fatty acids. Annual Reviews in Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology
49: 611–641.
Stumpe M, Carsjens J-G, Stenzel I, Goebel C, Lang I, Pawlowski K,
Hause B, Feussner I. 2005. Lipid metabolism in arbuscular mycorrhizal
roots of Medicago truncatula. Phytochemistry 66: 781–791.
Thompson JD, Gibson TK, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG.
1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple
sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research
24: 4876–4882.
Trépanier M, Bécard G, Moutoglis P, Willemot C, Gagné S, Tyler AS,
Rioux JA. 2005. Dependence of arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi on their
plant host for palmitic acid synthesis. Applied and Environmental
Microbiology 71: 5341–5347.
New Phytologist (2009) 182: 950–964
www.newphytologist.org
Wanders RJA, Waterham HR. 2006. Biochemistry of mammalian
peroxisomes revisited. Annual Reviews of Biochemistry
75: 295–332.
van der Westhuizen J, Kock J, Botha A, Botes P. 1994. The distribution of
the ω3- and ω6-series of cellular long-chain fatty acids in fungi. Systematic
and Applied Microbiology 17: 327–345.
Wilson RA, Calvo AM, Chang P-K, Keller NP. 2004. Characterization of
the Aspergillus parasiticus DELTA12-desaturase gene: a role for lipid
metabolism in the Aspergillus-seed interaction. Microbiology
150: 2881–2888.
Wolff R, Christie W, Coakley D. 1997a. The unusual occurrence of
14-methylhexadecanoic acid in Pinaceae seed oils among plants. Lipids 32:
971–973.
Wolff RL, Dareville E, Martin JC. 1997b. Positional distribution of
Δ5-olefinic acids in triacylglycerols from conifer seed oils: General and
specific enrichment in the sn-3 position. Journal of the American Oil
Chemists Society 74: 515–523.
Xu J, Saunders CW, Hu P, Grant RA, Boekhout T, Kuramae EE,
Kronstad JW, DeAngelis YM, Reeder NL, Johnstone KR et al. 2007.
Dandruff-associated Malassezia genomes reveal convergent and divergent
virulence traits shared with plant and human fungal pathogens. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104: 18730–18735.
Supporting Information
Additional supporting information may be found in the
online version of this article.
Fig. S1 Gas chromatography/flame ionization detection
(GC/FID) analysis of fatty acid methyl esters isolated from
the lipid fraction of different tissues of Laccaria bicolour.
Fig. S2 Changes in fatty acid concentration in Laccaria
bicolor grown for 30 d in liquid culture media.
Table S1 List of primers used for quantitative RT-PCR
Table S2 Comparison of the relative expression of selected
genes using whole-genome expression oligoarray (WGEO)
and quantitative RT-PCR
Please note: Wiley-Blackwell are not responsible for the
content or functionality of any supporting information
supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing
material) should be directed to the New Phytologist Central
Office.
© The Authors (2009)
Journal compilation © New Phytologist (2009)
135
10. Chapter IX: Conclusions in French
Contexte et résumé général
Les forêts sont des écosystèmes extrêmement complexes et l’anthropisation relativement
faible à laquelle elles sont soumises favorise leur hétérogénéité, source de biodiversité et de
niches biologiques. Dans les sols forestiers, la vie microbienne est particulièrement
exubérante et les communautés fongiques y tiennent une place majeure, dominées par ltrois
grands groupes fonctionnels, les saprophytes, décomposeurs de bois et de litière, les
champignons mutualistes, biotrophes ectomycorhiziens (ECM), et les espèces pathogènes.
Ces organismes jouent un rôle fondamental dans la minéralisation des composés organiques,
l’alimentation hydrominérale des arbres et dans la régulation des cycles majeurs, en
particulier les cycles du carbone et de l'azote (Boddy and Watkinson, 1995 ; Fitter et al.,
2005). Si les champignons saprophytes utilisent le C de la litière consécutivement à des
processus cellulolytiques et ligninolytiques, les champignons ECM reçoivent du C, par la
symbiose qu'ils établissent avec les racines des arbres. Mais de nombreuses espèces
ectomycorhiziennes présentent des comportements variant du semi-saprophytisme à la
symbiose stricte (Högberg et al., 1999).
Dans les écosystèmes forestiers, la richesse et la diversité des communautés fongiques
contrastent fortement avec le faible nombre d’espèces ligneuses. Les facteurs qui influencent
le développement de ces communautés et le maintien d’une telle diversité sont encore mal
connus.
Les
modifications
environnementales,
parfois
consécutives
aux
activités
anthropiques, peuvent avoir des conséquences variables sur ces communautés fongiques
(Wallenda and Kottke, 1998; Erland and Taylor, 2000). Dans ce cas, les études concernant
une gestion productiviste ont mis en évidence une simplification de la strate ligneuse par
plantation ou substitution d’essence, une baisse de la fertilité des sols et une modification de
la diversité fongique (Le Tacon et al., 2001). Les changements d’essences et les plantations
d’espèces productives, lié parfois à des enrésinements massifs, sont au cœur des stratégies de
gestion sylvicole. Des recherches récentes ont portées l’accent sur la spécificité d’hôte et
l’influence des arbres sur la structure des communautés fongiques. L’influence de l’hôte a été
bien illustrée dans de récentes études portant sur les communautés ectomycorhiziennes et
indiquant une spécificité d’hôte importante chez espèces fongiques, en particulier vis-à-vis
136
des conifères et des feuillus (Ishida et al., 2003), mais aussi un impact fort de d’espèces
ligneuses différentes mais issues du même genre (Morris et al., 2008). Par ailleurs, de
nombreux éléments structurant évoluent en fonction du temps et des saisons, intimement liés
aux facteurs pédo-climatiques. Ainsi, il a été démontré que ces communautés fongiques, en
particulier chez les espèces ECM, évoluées au cours du temps, selon leur potentiel
d’adaptation aux changements climatiques ou aux variations phénologiques des plantes hôtes
auxquelles ces microorganismes sont associés (Buée et al., 2005; Courty et al., 2008). C’est la
raison pour laquelle, une meilleure compréhension de la structuration de ces communautés
microbiennes est nécessaire pour que l’aménagement des forêts s'inscrive dans une gestion
durable de l’écosystème et respectueuse de la biodiversité.
Cependant, pour investir une telle diversité microbienne et mieux appréhender les moteurs de
structuration de ces communautés, il est nécessaire de développer et d’affiner les outils de
diagnostiques taxonomiques. Plusieurs dizaines d’espèces fongiques sont couramment
associées à un même arbre et d’un arbre à l’autre, l’hétérogénéité du cortège fongique porte
cette estimation à plusieurs centaines d’espèces à l’échelle d’un peuplement. Cette diversité
de champignons s’illustre très bien en période automnale, lors de l’émergence des
fructifications, mais aussi tout au long de l’année par des études de diversité axées sur
l’analyse de la morphologie des apex ectomycorhiziens et de leur mycélium. Ce mycélium
externe peut être, par exemple, hydrophile ou hydrophobe, plus ou moins ramifié, diffus ou
agrégé en rhizomorphes… (Agerer, 1987-1998). Les approches écologiques concernant ces
champignons symbiotiques reposent traditionnellement sur l’inventaire des carpophores
visibles au sein l’écosystème forestier étudié. Beaucoup de travaux reposent encore sur cette
démarche, non destructive mais saisonnière (Garbaye et Le Tacon 1982, Peter et al. 2001,
Egli et al. 2006). Cependant, nombres de champignons ectomycorhiziens ne génèrent que des
fructifications discrètes, comme les Tylospora spp. ou Tomentella spp., ou des carpophores
épigés, comme les truffes, ou ne fructifient même pas, comme Cenococcum geophilum (Jany
et al. 2002). Diverses études comparatives ont donc montré que les carpophores ne donnaient
qu’une image tronquée de la diversité ectomycorhizienne (Peter et al. 2001, Buée et al.
données non publiées), qui pouvait être décrite plus précisément via l’analyse morphologique
ou moléculaire des apex racinaires ectomycorhizées (Agerer 1987-1998, Buée et al. 2005,
Courty et al. 2006). Au cours de ces 15 dernières années, la généralisation de la PCR et le
développement de nombreuses techniques d’empreintes moléculaires qui en dérivent (TRFLP, SSCP, TGGE, etc.) ont permis une meilleure description de la diversité de ces
137
champignons symbiotiques (pour revue, voir Anderson, 2006). Ces approches PCR
permettent de comparer des régions de différents génomes fongiques, et grâce à certaines
d’entre elles, de discriminer les espèces sur la base du polymorphisme de ces séquences, après
les avoir comparées à des bases de données (NCBI1, UNITE2). Les régions les plus exploitées
pour ces études de diversité moléculaire des champignons sont situées au sein d’un locus
répété de l’ADN ribosomal nucléaire : les Internal Transcribed Spacer ou ITS (Horton &
Bruns, 2001). Cependant, malgré l’automatisation de ces approches moléculaires, il semble
indispensable d’intégrer des techniques d’analyse de la diversité à très haut débit, à l’heure où
l’estimation de la richesse fongique se porte à plus de 1,5 millions d’espèces (Hawksworth,
2001). Ainsi, les perspectives technologiques, à court terme, reposent sur le développement
de puces à ADN taxonomiques (« phyloarrays ») spécifiquement conçues pour réaliser des
études de diversité à haut débit à l’image des microréseaux d’ADN développés pour l’étude
de certaines communautés bactériennes (Brodie et al., 2006). Jusqu’à présent, au phyloarray
n’a été développé pour des études d’écologie moléculaire des champignons à large spectre,
c’est-à-dire incluant l’ensemble d’une communauté. En effet, seuls quelques travaux se sont
focalisés sur des études diagnostiques de pathogènes fongique par cette stratégie de
microréseaux d’ADN (Lievens et al., 2003, 2005). Parallèlement à au développement de cette
technologie, les sciences du vivant sont ébranlées par l’émergence des nouvelles techniques
de séquençage massif, ou pyroséquençage, (Rothberg and Leamon, 2008) qui permettent
d’envisager le décodage de plus d’un million de séquences en un seul « run ». Les premières
application du pyroséquençage en écologie microbienne ont été éprouvés ces dernières années
sur les communautés procaryotiques (Sogin et al. 2006; Roesch et al. 2007), mais aucun
travail n’a encore été publié sur les communautés fongiques.
Ma thèse avait donc pour objectifs d’évaluer l’impact de l’arbre hôte, en particulier dans le
cadre de la gestion forestière, sur la composition de la communauté fongique. L’approche
s’inscrivant dans le temps, l’étude de la variation saisonnière des espèces et de la structuration
temporelle a également été abordée. Comme décrit précédemment, le pré requis initial de ce
travail a été le développement d’outils à haut débit pour l’analyse de cette diversité, en
particulier la génération et la validation de la première puce taxonomique fongique, mais
aussi l’exploitation des technologies de pyroséquençage en écologie microbienne (Chapitre
1).
Dans un dispositif expérimental de la forêt domaniale de Breuil-Chenu (Nièvre), au nord-est
du Massif Central dans le Morvan, la diversité des champignons forestiers a été étudiée par
ces différentes approches et les résultats obtenus ont été comparés aux données acquises par
138
des techniques plus traditionnelles, allant du morphotypage des apex mycorhiziens au clonage
séquençage (Sanger). Le peuplement initial est un taillis sous futaie (TSF) constitué
principalement par du hêtre et du chêne. En 1976, des plantations de six essences différentes
(hêtre, chêne, épicéa commun, douglas, sapin de Nordmann et pin laricio) ont été réalisées
après coupe à blanc du TSF afin d’évaluer, entre autre, l’influence de l’enrésinement sur les
sols et la diversité biologique. Dans deux études distinctes, nous avons détaillé le
développement successif de deux générations de puces taxonomiques (phyloarrays),
respectivement spécifiques (1) des champignons ectomycorhiziens puis (2) de l’ensemble des
espèces rattachées au royaume fongique. Ce dernier travail repose sur l’analyse
bioinformatique de 23 393 séquences qui ont permis de générée 84 891 oligonucléotides
spécifiques de 9 678 espèces fongiques actuellement décrites sur la base du typage
moléculaire de la région ITS (Chapitre 2 et 3). Ces outils ont permis de conforter l’effet
particulièrement structurant de la plante hôte sur les espèces fongiques associées, en
comparant deux essences distinctes : le hêtre et l’épicéa.
Profitant de l’émergence des nouvelles technologies de séquençage au cours de ma thèse,
nous avons éprouvé l’approche 454 pyroséquençage en écologie microbienne. Ainsi, la
diversité fongique de l’ensemble de la communauté a été décrite à partir d’échantillons du
sols collectés sous 6 essences distinctes sur le site de Breuil (chêne, hêtre, épicéa, pin Corse,
sapin de Douglas et sapin de Nordmann). Cette technologie nous a permis de générer plus de
185 000 « amplicons » et d’obtenir pour chaque traitement entre 26 000 et 35 000 séquences,
correspondant, après analyse bioinformatique et alignement sur les bases de données, à 600 –
1000 OTUs, selon les plantations (chapitre 4). La comparaison de cette technique de
séquençage à haut débit avec les approches de phyloarrays (micro-réseaux d’ADN) met en
évidence une complémentarité forte des deux techniques, mais aussi illustre les contraintes
des approches moléculaires à haut débit, intimement liées à la qualité d’incrémentation des
bases de données (Conclusion). De manière intéressante, les résultats acquis par affiliation à
des bases de données épurées (n’intégrant que les séquences taxonomiquement bien
identifiées) montre une distribution homogène des genres fongiques sous les différentes
espèces d’hôtes. Mais, l’analyse comparative des données, à l’échelle de l’espèce, conforte
encore un effet structurant de l’hôte, en particulier opposant les feuillus entre eux (chêne et
hêtre) et les feuillus versus conifères.
Malgré toute la richesse de ces techniques moléculaires et l’immense volume de données
qu’elles génèrent, la mycologie et la taxonomie morphologique des champignons restent des
sciences fondamentales et essentielles, puisque c’est le couplage des analyses morphologiques
139
et moléculaires, à partir des fructifications ou des différentes structures fongiques, qui permet
l’enrichissement et l’incrémentation des bases de données, indispensables au développement
de l’écologie moléculaire et à l’exploitation des nouvelles technologies à haut débit. Le
maintien de la diversité des approches taxonomiques et des compétences en écologie
microbienne reste un réel challenge pour la communauté scientifique.
Ainsi, que la forêt soit vierge, aménagée ou même très artificialisée (plantation d’essences
exotiques à croissance rapide), l’interdépendance entre les arbres et les champignons est
particulièrement étroite. Par conséquent, toute perturbation d’origine naturelle ou anthropique
(pollution, sylviculture) retentit sur ces interactions en équilibre plus ou moins instable. Les
connaissances actuelles sur les relations forêt-champignons, acquises grâce à un effort de
recherche récent mais croissant, montrent donc clairement que tout projet à long terme de
gestion durable des ressources forestières doit se préoccuper de la stabilité des équilibres
biologiques interactifs, dans lesquels les champignons ectomycorhiziens sont des partenaires
déterminants. Il existe aussi désormais des outils de diagnostic et, dans certains cas, des
moyens d’intervention pour contrôler et maîtriser les relations arbre-champignon. Leur
maîtrise pourrait se révéler essentielle à la mise en œuvre d’une sylviculture plus durable.
Note sur l’annotation du génome de Laccaria bicolor
Au cours de ma thèse, mon laboratoire d’accueil a coordonné le séquençage et l’annotation
du génome du champignon ectomycorhizien modèle Laccaria bicolor. Bénéficiant d’un
contexte scientifique particulier, j’ai pu m’impliquer fortement dans le consortium
d’annotation de ce génome et participer à la publication d’un article dans la revue Nature.
Plus précisément, j’ai été impliqué dans l’annotation des gènes liés au métabolisme lipidique,
en particulier 63 gènes majeurs de la voie de biosynthèse des acides gras. L’analyse de ces
différents gènes a été réalisées à l’échelle génomique, mais également au niveau
transcriptomique. Ce travail a également fait l’objet d’une publication dans la revue New
Phytologist.
140
141
11. Chapter X: Conclusions
Where we are, what we know…
Forests are highly complex ecosystems and are important resources in ecological, social and
economic dimensions. In the course of quickly increasing deforestation, discussion about
sustainable forestation and forest conservation becomes more and more urgent. For an
optimal protection of forests, the global status of biomes within forests and their response to
environmental factors have to be understood (Sukumar, 2008). A high diversity of biomes can
be found above-ground and below-ground. Fungi are important components of soil biomes
and act as decomposers, pathogens or mycorrhizal mutualists.
Fungal communities show a high diversity in richness and structure as several environmental
factors influence their composition. To understand functioning of soil biomes the impact of
single factors such as edaphic factors, climate, fire and anthropogenic activities on fungal
communities has been studied in the last fifteen years (Dahlberg, 2001). It was shown that
plant composition has a major impact on the structure and functioning of fungal communities.
The presence of dominant and rare fungal species differs between forest types influenced by
the different availability of water and soil nutrients and microclimate conditions.
Additionally, indirect influence over tree debris, such as needle, dead leaves or cones has
been reported (Takumasu et al., 1994; Zhou & Hyde, 2001).
Recent research focused on the effect of host taxonomic affiliation on ectomycorrhizal (ECM)
communities. It was reported that communities sharing host trees of similar taxonomic status
showed similar structure compared to communities associated to more taxonomical distinct
host trees (Ishida et al., 2007). The influence of the replacement of a native forest by monospecific plantations on fungal diversity is controversially discussed. In temperate coniferous
plantations high fungal diversity was observed (Newton & Haigh, 1998, Humphrey et al.,
2000), while in exotic conifer plantations lower fungal diversity than in native hardwood
stands was reported (Villeneuve et al. 1989, Ferris et al., 2000).
142
Detection techniques
In the last 15 years, ecological studies on fungal communities have been carried out using
different molecular biological tools very often combined with classical techniques such as
morphotyping. Especially the determination of ITS as DNA barcode for fungi and the
adjustment of PCR conditions for the amplification of the total fungal community allowed
first insights into fungal community dynamic (Horton & Bruns, 2001). However, detailed
ecological studies of fungal communities stayed challenging as the used techniques limited
the number of samples, which can be processed in a realistic time frame.
Identification of fungal taxa can nowadays be expanded to high-throughput molecular
diagnostic tools, such as microarrays. First microarrays were developed with the aim to
monitor gene expression and to analyze polymorphisms. But ongoing development allowed
the use of array technique to describe community structures (phylochips) as thousands of
species-specific probes can be fixed to the carrier glasslides. Successful application of
phylochips in ecological studies was demonstrated by the identification of bacterial species
from diverse ecosystems and of few genera of pathogenic and composting fungi (Sessitsch et
al., 2006). First application of a small-scale phylochip (southern dot blot) to trace
ectomycorrhizal fungi (EMF) was reported by Bruns and Gardes (1993), who developed a
specific Nylon-phylochip to detect Suilloid fungi. Recently, this approach has been also used
for truffle identification (El Karkouri et al., 2007); but no study has reported the construction
and application of a large-scale fungal phylochip to detect fungal species from environmental
samples.
During the course of my PhD-thesis another high-throughput technique was developed and
became the method of the year 2008: 454 pyrosequencing. This is a sequencing technique
combining the complete sequence process covering all subsequent steps from the gene of
interest to the finished sequence (Margulies et al., 2005). In first experiments, 454
pyrosequencing technique was used to sequence bacterial genomes, but with its ongoing
development it could also be applied in metagenomic analysis. Bacterial community
structures of different ecosystems have already been described with more than over 10,000
generated sequences (Huber et al., 2007). So far, no studies have been published on fungal
communities by using 454 pyrosequencing.
143
The aims of my thesis
The project of my thesis was to describe the richness and the diversity of fungal communities
under different mono-specific plantations of a temperate forest in Breuil-Chenue (Burgundy,
France; Ranger et al., 2004). Thirty-five years ago the native deciduous forest (oak, beech,
birch and hazel tree) was substituted by mono-plantations of six different tree species
(Norway spruce, Nordmann fir, Douglas fir, Corsican pine, oak and beech). First inventories
of fungal communities have already been made by carpophore observations. Therefore, the
aims of my thesis were (i) to describe the impact of host tree species on ECM communities
under beech and spruce over the time-scale of one year, and (ii) to give an exhaustive
description of the composition and richness of fungal communities under the six different tree
species.
To overcome the above described problems of classical detection techniques, we (i)
developed a large-scale phylochip to trace several fungal species simultaneously, (ii)
validated the developed phylochip to test its capacity to describe fungal communities from
environmental samples, and (iii) applied the developed phylochip and 454 pyrosequencing in
our ecological studies. Additionally, we compared results of fungal genotyping using these
two novel high-throughput techniques, 454 pyrosequencing and phylochip, against each other
to describe inherent bias of each technology.
Genotyping using phylochips
Small-scale phylochips (nylon- and OPERON-glasslide-phylochips)
In a pilot experiment, we developed in a single oligonucleotide probe approach a small-scale
ribosomal ITS phylochip carrying probes for 89 ECM species. The sensitivity and specificity
of the oligonucleotides were evaluated using mixed known fungal ITS sequences. The
phylochip was then used for characterizing ECM fungal communities sampled from 35-yearold spruce and beech plantations on the Breuil-Chenue experimental site. Morphotyping and
ITS sequencing of ECM root tips, together with sequencing of ITS clone libraries of these
environmental samples, validated the application of the phylochip for fungal ecological
studies.
93% of the oligonucleotides generated positive hybridization signals with their corresponding
ITS. 52% of the probes gave a signal with only species for which they were designed. Crosshybridization was reported mainly within the genera of Cortinarius and was restricted to the
genus showing a low intragenerus ITS sequence divergence (< 3%). Detection limit of the
phylochip was highly dependent on the amount of spotted oligonucleotides. Weak signal
144
intensities were already detected with an amount of 0.0001 pmol of spotted oligonucleotides.
The phylochip confirmed the presence of most ECM fungi detected with the two other
approaches except for the fungal species for which corresponding oligonucleotides were not
present on the phylochip. 13 and 15 ECM fungal species associated to spruce or beech were
identified. Thus, we concluded that fungal ITS phylochips enable the detection and
monitoring of ECM fungi in a routine, accurate and reproducible manner and facilitate the
study of community dynamics, but also information about taxonomic affiliation of species.
Large-scale phylochip (NimblGen array)
Gaining from this pilot experiment, we designed in a second step the first generation of
phylochip reporting all fungal ITS sequences deposited at the NCBI GenBank and UNITE
database for large-scale analysis of soil fungal communities. For the oligonucleotide design,
we downloaded all available fungal ITS sequences (~41,000) from public databases. Several
ITS sequences of the public databases showed a low quality and were often truncated. In
addition, numerous deposited ITS sequences corresponded to unidentified species or were
poorly taxonomically annotated. Thus, we subjected all downloaded sequences to an
automated quality control based on a series of scripts written by Henrik Nilsson (University
of Göteborg, Sweden). Thus, only fully identified, high-quality fungal ITS-sequences were
used for the design of our phylochip. To overcome the observed cross-hybridization within
the analysis of the nylon- and OPERON-phylochips we opted for five oligonucleotides per
sequence. The design of the oligonucleotide-probes was carried out by NimbleGen Systems
(Mason, WI, USA) using their appropriate software. On this database, we applied a serious of
post-design filtering scripts. Hereby, we excluded all oligonucleotides (i) with sequence
overlap elsewhere than the ITS1 and ITS2 i.e., coding RNA sequences, and (ii) those which
showed less than 3 bp difference to sequence of other species than they were designed for.
Only high-quality oligonucleotides for 7,151 fungal species remained after these filtering
steps on the NimbleGen phylochip. This represents 74% of the fully identified, trustful
sequences of Genbank.
We used the NimbleGen-phylochip to access the impact of the host tree species on ECM
communities in beech and spruce plantations (Breuil-Chenue site) over the time scale of one
year. Comparison of the ECM community accessed by ITS cloning/sequencing and the
NimbleGen phylochip approach confirmed the feasibility of this “All Fungal ITS” phylochip
in ecological studies. The phylochip genotyping showed a higher sensitivity than the
sequencing approach as additional ECM species, endophytic, saprophytic and pathogenic
145
fungi were detected in tree roots. However, cross-hybridization between probes was observed
for several taxa having very similar ITS sequences (e.g. Russulaceae). A mutiple probe
approach on ITS regions cannot overcome these cross-hybridization problems. The low
number of phylogenetically informative base pairs that are found in some fungal taxa (e.g.
Russulaceae) hindered oligonucleotide design on ITS regions. Difficulties in distinguishing
certain ECM species based solely on their ITS-region have been reported elsewhere (Edwards
& Turko, 2005), which is consistent with our observation that cross-hybridizations
accumulated in certain fungal taxa. Owing to this limitation, certain fungal taxa can only be
determined to the genera level using the “All Fungal ITS” phylochip. For an identification of
all species to the species level, an oligonucleotide-design including multiple probes and
multiple genes is likely needed. Furthermore, phylochips can only detect species for which
oligonucleotides were designed, but a nested approach by using probes specific on genus or
family level can help to describe the cryptic species.
The advantage of the current phylochip analysis, however, is the accurate description of
hundred to thousand species to a taxonomical level. Additionally, ITS phylochip approach
enables a reproducible detection in a routine manner prossessing a high number of samples in
a relative short time. Thus, we proposed to use phylochip genotyping in studies monitoring
the spatial and temporal diversities of well-described fungal communities.
The NimbleGen phylochip was used to access the influence of host tree species on ECM
community diversity in the beech and spruce plantation at Breuil-Chenue. In total 59 fungal
species were detected among them 53 EMF. Thirty-one species were only identified in one of
the samples and in all but one sample endophytic, saprotrophic and pathogenic fungi were
present. Probable cross-hybridization was observed in the genera of Cortinarius, Laccaria
and Lactarius.
Nineteen fungal species were exclusively associated to beech. Three of them, Russula
emetica, Mycena galopus and Entoloma conferendum, were present during all seasons while
Lactarius tabidus was present in the samples taken in October and March. In contrast, 26
fungal species were specific to spruce. Seven species were present in the samples of October
and March while all other species were only present in samples of one sampling time point.
Correspondence analysis separated the samples of the beech and spruce along the first axe
while samples of October were separated from samples taken in March and May on the
second axe. The described host preference is in consistence with known host preferences like
for Lactarius subdulcis, L. theiogalus and Russula parazurea to deciduous forest trees, which
we found only under beech. In spruce samples we identified also EMF with known spruce
146
preference like Cortinarius rubrovioleipes, C. sanguineus and C.traganus and Rhizopogon
species. Xerocomus badius and X. pruinatus, two widely described ubiquistic fungi
(Courtecuisse, 2000, 2008), were present in all samples. Most of the partitioning of the found
species corresponded to carpophore observations carried out at the same experimental site
over seven years (Buée et al., in preparation). Thus, we showed that host preference of EMF
reported for mixed forest in Japan (Ishida et al., 2007), California woodlands (Morris et al.,
2008) or Tasmanian wet sclerophyll forest (Tedersoo et al., 2008) can also be found in monoplantations of temperate forests.
Beside the host preference we observed additionally temporal partitioning of ECM
communities. Seasonal influence on ECM communities has already been reported by other
authors, which assumed an indirect influence of seasonal changes on host physiology such as
root elongation after leaf senescence or weathering effects like changing soil moisture (Buée
et al., 2005; Courty et al., 2008; Koide et al., 2007). However, since we have taken samples
solely one year long we cannot show with evidence which of the seasonal dependent factors
structured mostly ECM communities on our experimental site.
147
Comparison of the high-throughput genotyping techniques
To compare the two high-throughput technologies, NimbleGen phylochip and 454
pyrosequencing, we described the fungal communities in soil under beech and spruce of the
Breuil-Chenue site. Differences in the repertoire of soil fungal species were observed in the
term of species richness, taxonomical diversity and taxonomic affiliation.
454 pyrosequencing
454 pyrosequencing generated for each soil DNA sample over 2,500 ITS sequences
corresponding to ~600 operational taxonomic units (OTU’s) present in the beech soil sample
and to ~1,000 OTU’s found in the spruce soil sample (OTU was defined as species with ITS
sharing 97% identity). Resampling curves of both samples were still far from reaching an
asymptote meaning that the full species richness was not detected. Only 15 species were fully
identified for the spruce sample and six for the beech sample using the GenBank database for
BLAST analysis. This shows, that the automated analyses of generated sequences bear an
inherent bias of 454 pyrosequencing. The relative large proportion of low quality or wrongly
annotated sequences found in public databases can cause misleading BLAST hits, which will
be overseen by automated analyses. Additionally, the large number of undefined species
(=unknown fungal species, no hit) can also hinder BLAST analysis to show always the best
hit to fully identified species. To overcome this problem, we applied filtering steps to the
database before blasting against it. In our dataset, before a filtering step, the number of
undefined sequences was already 71%. When we blasted the sequences against a database
containing only sequences of fully identified fungal species, 54 fungal species of the spruce
sample and 33 of the beech sample were described as fully identified.
To minimize the number of questionable BLAST matches or technical artifacts a relative
stringent E-value for BLAST analysis can be chosen. Nevertheless, using a too stringent Evalue increases the number of undefined sequences showing that fine adjustment of E-value is
critical. Therefore, we tested in a first step the default value of the NCBI BLAST server
which is an E-value ≤ 10-03. Furthermore, an arbitrary setting of an overall threshold to 3% for
interspecific ITS sequence divergence is questionable, as a wide range of intraspecific
sequence divergence exists in fungal groups (from < 1% for Russula spp to > 15% for
Pisolithus spp; Martin et al., 2002).
As 454 pyrosequencing is a recently developed technique, it still needs a lot of improvement
and optimization of various technical steps and analysis tools. Although novel programs, such
as MEGAN (Huson et al., 2007), AMPHORA (Wu & Eisen, 2008) and CAMERA (Seshadri
148
et al., 2007) have been developed to cope with deep sequencing data, fine-tuning of user’sfriendly softwares capable to deal with a high number of sequences is necessary allowing the
user under variable conditions to adjust filtering steps, threshold levels and E-values to the
dataset and studied organism groups.
Now, 454 pyrosequencing is providing unexpected insights into fungal community richness
and composition, but results still have to be handled cautiously. The comparison of species
richness and diversity from different 454 pyrosequencing studies stays questionable until a
standardized method to analyze and interpret data will be developed.
NimbleGen ITS phylochip
Amongst the 7,151 fungal species having reporter probes on the NimbleGen ITS phylochip,
only ~70 species were detected on the beech and spruce plantation of Breuil-Chenue using the
most stringent signal intensity threshold. This includes 25 fungal species of the beech DNA
sample and 43 of the spruce DNA sample. With a less stringent signal threshold value, lessabundant species were detected increasing the number of taxa found to 147 and 104 in beech
and spruce DNA samples, respectively. In the beech sample, however, the species number
within certain genera increased enormously. This suggested that the results of the designed
overall fungal kingdom phylochip can be used in two different approaches. The first option
uses a stringent signal threshold to detect the most abundant known species with a high
species-specificity. The other option relies on the use of the phylochip with a low stringent
threshold signal detecting less abundant species, but accepting a significant level of crosshybridization between closely related species. Then, the presence of certain taxa can be
confirmed at the genera level, but not at the species level.
When taxonomic affiliation of the fully identified species detected by 454 pyrosequencing
and NimbleGen phylochip were compared against each other, only few identical affiliations
were found due to the inherent bias of each technique. However, none of the used highthroughput techniques described clearly more fungal taxa as fully identified species than the
other one showing that multiple-approach stays crucial for accurate ecological studies.
149
Assessing soil fungal diversity using 454 pyrosequencing
With 454 pyrosequencing we described for the first time fungal community composition
under six different tree species (Abies nordmannia, Picea abies, Pinus nigra, Pseudotsuga
menziesii, Fagus sylvatica, Quercus sessiflora). Between 25,680 to 35,600 sequences were
generated for the different soil DNA samples (180,213 fungal sequences in total)
corresponding to 580 to 1,000 OTU’s. However, for none of the samples the rarefaction curve
reached an asymptote meaning that the number of occurring sequences (i.e., OTU) may be
much larger. BLAST against databases with only fully identified fungal sequences defined
42% of sequences as Basidiomycota, 17% as Ascomycota and 8% as Mortierella. However,
the largest part belonged to unclassified Dikarya (20%), unclassified fungi (11%) and
unclassified fungi/Metazoa group (2%). These non identified OTU’s could however be used
to compare fungal diversity and OTU richness between communities in ecosystems.
Correspondence analysis separated oak soil DNA sample from the other soil samples on the
first axe and beech sample from coniferous species on the second axe. The much larger
number of Basidiomycota solely found in oak soil DNA samples can explain this. The
majority of fungal families were represented in all six plantations, but when looking on
species level strong host preference was found. The most abundant fungal species were
Cryptococcus podzolicus (45,354 sequences in total) and Scleroderma bovista (19,928)
present in all soil samples. Inocybe umbrina and Mortierella hyaline belonged to the five
most abundant species in beech, Douglas fir, fir and spruce. Lactarius quietus was the third
most abundant species (6,952), but was solely present in oak soil sample. However, the
number of fully identified species was for each sample low. For example, only 33 known
species were described for beech sample and 54 for spruce sample. This is a low % of the
overall fungal community and this calls for DNA barcoding programs aiming to increase the
number of fungal species characterized at the molecular level. Sequencing the ITS of
herbarium is a way to increase this number of know species in DNA databases (Brock et al.,
2009). This shows that in-depth description on species level of fungal communities by 454
pyrosequencing stays challenging. Further analysis will especially focus on better exploitation
of databases for the analysis of the huge amount of sequences produced.
150
Conclusion: high-throughput techniques
We could show that the “All Fungal ITS” phylochip and 454 pyrosequencing are promising
techniques for in-depth analysis of fungal communities. However, both techniques show
inherent bias influencing in different ways the results of ecological studies. This shows that
multiple approach studies will give the most accurate and detailed results analysing fungal
communities. Additionally, the high dependence of both high-throughput techniques on
public databases strengthens the need of filling these gaps by continuing to work also with
classical taxonomic approaches.
Phylochip
-
possible optimization
• dependence on
public databases
• cross-hybridization
• only species
detected, for which
oligonucleotide were
designed
• fixing threshold
+
• filtering databases
• multi-gene/multi-probe
approach
• not all gene regions are
feasible as barcode
regions in phylochip
approach
• nested probe approach
• accurate description
to a taxonomic level
• reproducible
detection
• routine manner: high
sample throughput in
a relative short time
• use for site-specific
analysis
• mathematical model
454 pyrosequencing
•
•
•
•
high dependence on public
databases
high number of undefined
species
adjustment of E-value for
BLAST analysis
different threshold of
intraspecific sequence
similarity between taxa
possible optimization
•
filtering databases
•
•
development of
analysis tools
+
•
exhaustive studies, but need of
enormous generation of
sequences
151
Conclusion: impact of host tree species on fungal community
The different genotyping surveys used in this project showed that different tree species
strikingly impact the soil microbial communities including ectomycorrhizal fungi (EMF).
Host preference of fungi was observed for EMF as Lactarius quietus interacting with oak or
Lactarius tabidus and Russula parazurea with beech and certain Cortinariaceae, as
Cortinarius rubrovioleipes and C. sanguineus with spruce. These observations supported and
extended carpophore surveys (Buée et al., in preparation). Fungal communities clearly
differed between beech and oak plantations, and the other tree species plantations. This
indicates the impact of forest management on fungal community structure, where
monospecific plantations are substituted for mixed forests of beech and oak trees. The
differences in fungal community composition and species distribution can be explained by the
presence of specific fungal networks already formed before for oak and beech while for other
tree species the specific fungal networks had to be developed. Additionally, differences in
litter composition, understorey vegetation and canopy structure between the different tree
species can also indirectly influence fungal community structure. Which of these indirect
factors are mainly influencing fungal diversity and how fungal communities of plantations
response to changing environmental factors will be focused in future studies.
152
153
12. References of Introduction and Conclusions
Acosta-Martínez V, Dowd S, Sun Y, Allen V (2008) Tag-encoded pyrosequencing
analysis of bacterial diversity in a single soil type as affected by management and land
use. AEM 40: 2762-2770.
Agerer R (1987-1998) Colour atlas of ectomycorrhizae. 1st-11th edn. Einhorn,
Schwäbisch Gmünd.
Agerer R (2001) Exploration type of ectomycorrhizae. Mycorrhiza 11: 107-114.
Agrawal AA, Ackerly DD, Adler F, Arnold AE, Cáceres C, Doak DF, Post E, Hudson
PJ, Maron J, Mooney KA, Power M, Schemske D, Stachowicz J, Strauss S, Turner
MG, Werner E (2007) Filling key gaps in population and community ecology. Front
Ecol Envrion 5: 145-152.
Aguileta G, Marthey S, Chiapello H, Lebrun MH, Rodolphe F, Fournier E,
Gendrault-Jacquemard A, Giraud T (2008) Assessing the performance of single-copy
genes for recovering robust phylogenies. Systematic Biology 57: 613-627.
Ahulu ME, Gollotte A, Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Nonaka M (2006) Cooccurring plants
forming distinct arbuscular mycorrhizal morphologies harbor similar AM fungal species.
Mycorrhiza 17: 37-49.
Anderson IC (2006) Molecular ecology of ectomycorrhizal fungal communities: New
frontiers. In: Cooper & Rao (eds): Molecular techniques for soil, rhizosphere and plant
microorganism. Pp; 183-197. CAB International.
Anderson IC, Campbell CD, Prosser JI (2003) Potential bias of fungal 18S rDNA and
internal transcribed polymerase chain reaction primers for estimating fungal biodiversity
in soil. Environ Microbiol 5: 36-47.
Andries K, Verhasselt P, Guillemont J, Göhlmann H W H, Neefs JM, Winkler H,
Van Gestel J, Timmerman P, Zhu M, Lee E, Williams P, de Chaffoy D, Huitric E,
Hoffner S, Cambau E, Truffot-Pernot C, Lounis N, Jarlier V (2005) A diarylquinoline
drug active on the ATP synthase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 307: 223-227.
Bainbridge M N, Warren R L, Hirst M, Romanuik T, Zeng T, Go A, Delaney A,
Griffith M, Hickenbotham M, Magrini V, Mardis E R, Sadar M D, Siddiqui A S,
Marra M A, Jones S JM (2006) Analysis of the prostate cancer cell line LNCaP
transcriptome using a sequencing-by-synthesis approach. BMC Genomics 7: 246.
154
Beauchamp VB, Stromberg JC, Stutz JC (2006) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
associated with Populus-Salix stands in a semiarid riparian ecosystem. New Phytol 170:
369-380.
Bidartondo et al. (2008) Preserving accuracy in GenBank. Science 319: 1616.
Breitenbach J & Kränzlin F (eds.) (1984-2000) In: Pilze der Schweiz. Mycologia,
Luzerne, Schweiz.
Brock PM, Döring H, Bidartondo MI (2009) How to know inknown fungi: the role of a
herbarium. New Phytol 181: 719-724.
Bridge PD, Roberts PJ, Spooner BM, Panchall G (2003) On the unreliability of
published DNA sequences. New Phytol 160: 43-48.
Brodie EL, DeSantis TZ, Dominique CJ, Baek SM, Larsen JT, Andersen GL, Hazen
TC, Richardson PM, Herman DJ, Tokunaga TK, Wan JM, Firestone MK (2006)
Application of a high-density oligonucleotide microarray approach to study bacterial
population dynamics during uranium reduction and reoxidation. AEM 72: 6288-6298.
Bruns TD & Gardes M (1993) Molecular tools for the indentification of ectomycorrhizal
fungi - taxon specific oligonucleotide probes for suilloid fungi. Mol Ecol 2: 233-242.
Buée M, Vairelles D, Garbaye J (2005) Year-round monitoring of diversity and
potential metabolic activity of the ectomycorrhizal community in a beech (Fagus
sylvatica) forest subjected to two thinning regimes. Mycorrhiza 15: 235-245.
Burke DJ, Martin KJ, Rygiewicz PT, Topa MA (2005) Ectomycorrhizal fungi
identification in single and pooled root samples: terminal restriction fragment length
polymorphism (TRFLP) and morphotyping compared. SBB 37: 1683-1694.
Buscot F, Munch J C, Charcosset J Y, Gardes M, Nehls U, Hampp R (2000) Recent
advances in exploring physiology and biodiversity of ectomycorrhizas highlight the
functioning of these symbioses in ecosystems. New Phytol 24: 601-614.
Busti E, Bordoni R, Castiglioni B, Monciardini P, Sosio M, Donadio S, Consolandi C,
Bernardi LR, Battablia C, De Bellis G (2002) Bacterial discrimination by means of a
universal array approach mediated by LDR (ligase detection reaction). BMC Microbiology
2: 27.
Cheung F, Haas BJ, Goldberg SMD, May GD, Xiao Y, Town CD (2006) Sequencing
Medicago truncatula expressed sequenced tags using 454 Life Sciences technology. BMC
Genomics 7: 272.
155
Corradi N, Kuhn G, Sander IR (2004) Monophyly of beta-tubulin and H+ATPase gene
variants in Glomus intraradices: consequences for molecular evolutionary studies of AM
fungal genes. Fungal Genet Biol 41: 262-273.
Courty PE, Franc A, Pierrat JC, Garbaye J (2008) Temporal changes in the
ectomycorrhizal community in two soil horizons of a temperate oak forest. AEM 74:
5792-5801.
Danielson RM (1984) Ecotmycorrhizal associations in jack pine stands in north-eastern
Alberta. Can J Bot 62: 932-939.
Dickie IA, FritzJohn RG (2007) Using terminal restriction fragment length
polymorphism (T-RFLP) to identify mycorrhizal fungi: a methods review. Mycorrhiza 17:
259-270.
Dickie IA, Xu B and Koide T (2002) Vertical niche differentiation of ectomycorrhizal
hyphae in soil as shown by T-RFLP analysis. New Phytol 156: 527-535.
Dickson S (2004) The Arum-Paris continuum of mycorrhizal symbioses. New Phytol 163:
187-200.
Dinsdale EA, Edwards RA, Hall D, Angly F, Breitbart M, Brulc JM, Furlan M,
Desnues C, Haynes M, Li L, McDaniel L, Moran MA, Nelson KE, Nilsson C, Olson
R, Paul J, Brito BR, Ruan Y, Swan BK, Stevens R, Valentine DL, Thurber RV,
Wegley L, White BA, Rohwer F (2008) Functional metagenomic profiling of nine
biomes. Nature 452: 629-633.
Drigo B, Kowalchuk GA, van Veen JA (2008) Climate change goes underground:
effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on microbial community structure and activities in
the rhizosphere. Biol Fertil Soils 44: 667-679.
Edwards RA, Rodriguez-Brito B, Wegley L, Haynes M, Breitbart M, Peterson D M,
Saar MO, Alexander S, Alexander Jr EC, Rohwer F (2006) Using pyrosequencing to
shed light on deep mine microbial ecology. BMC Genomics 7: 57.
Egger KN & Hibbett DS (2004) The evolutionary implications of exploitation in
mycorrhizas. Can J Bot 82: 1110-1121.
El Karkouri K, Murat C, Zampieri E, Bonfante P (2007) Identification of ITS
sequences motifs in truffles: a first step toward their DNA barcoding. AEM 73: 53205330.
Erland S & Taylor AFS (2002) Diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungal communitites in
relation to the abiotic environment. In: Mycorrhizal Ecology. van der Heijden & Sander
IR (eds). Springer-Verlag. Heidelberg.
156
Ferris R, Peace AJ, Newton AC (2000) Macrofungal communities of lowland Scots pine
(Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L) Karsten) plantations in England:
relationships with site factors and stand structure. For Ecol Managm 131:255-267.
Finlay R D (2005) Mycorrhizal symbiosis: myths, misconceptions, new perspectives and
future research priorities. Mycologist 19: 90-94.
Frank AB (1885) Über die auf Würzelsymbiose beruhende Ehrnährung gewisser Bäume
durch unterirdische Pilze. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 3: 128-145.
Frankland JC (1998) Fungal succession – unravelling the unpredictable. Mycol Res 102:
1-15.
Gange AC & Brown VK (2002) Actions and interactions of soil invertebrates and
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in affecting the structure of plant communities. In:
Mycorrhizal Ecology. van der Heijden & Sander IR (eds). Springer-Verlag. Heidelberg.
Gange AC, Gange EG, Sparks TH, Boddy L (2007) Rapid and recent changes in fungal
fruiting patterns. Science 316: 71-72.
Gardes M & Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes
– application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2: 113-118.
Garland T & Carter Jr. PA (1994) Evolutionary physiology. Ann Rev Physiol 56: 579621.
Ge H, Walhout AJM, Vidal M (2003) Integrating `omic` information: a bridge between
genomics and systems biology. TRENDS in Genetics 19: 551-560.
Gehring CA & Whitham TG (2002) Mycorrhizae-herbivore interactions: population and
community consequences. In: Mycorrhizal Ecology. van der Heijden & Sander IR (eds).
Springer-Verlag. Heidelberg.
Genney DR, Anderson IC, Alexander IJ (2006) Fine-scale distribution of pine
ectomycorrhizas and their extramatrical mycelium. New Phytol 170: 381-390.
Godbold DL, Berntson GM, Bazzaz FA (1997) Growth and mycorrhizal colonization of
three North American tree species under elevated atmospheric CO2. New Phytol 137: 433440.
Gollotte A, van Tuinen D, Atkinson D (2004) Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
colonizing roots of the grass species Agrostis capillaris and Lolium perenne in a field
experiment. Mycorrhiza 14: 111-117.
Göranssona P, Olsson PA, Postmaa J, Falkengren-Grerup U (2008) Colonisation by
arbuscular mycorrhizal and fine endophytic fungi in four woodland grasses – variation in
relation to pH and aluminium. SBB 40: 2260-2265.
157
Grogan P, Baar J, Bruns TD (2000) Below-ground ectomycorrhizal community
structure in a recently burned bishop pine forest. J Ecol 88: 1051-1062.
Grove TS & Le Tacon F (1993) Mycorrhiza in plantation forestry. In: Advances in Plant
Pathology. Ingram DS & Williams PH (eds.). Volume 9. Academic Press, London, GB.
Hartley J, Cairney JWG, Meharg AA (1997) Do ectomycorrhizal fungi exhibit adaptive
tolerance to potentially toxic metals in the environment? Plant and Soil 189: 303-319.
He Z, Gentry TJ, Schadt CW, Wu L, Liebich J, Chong SC, Huang Z, Wu W, Gu B,
Jardine P, Criddle C, Zhou J (2007) GeoChip: a comprehensive microarray for
investigating biogeochemical, ecological and environmental processes. ISME J 1: 67-77.
Helgason T & Fitter A (2005) The ecology and evolution of the arbuscular mycorrhizal
fungi. Mycologist 19: 96-101.
Henrion B, Le Tacon F, Martin F (1992) Rapid identification of genetic variation of
ectomycorrhizal fungi by amplification of ribosomal RNA genes. New Phytol 122: 289298.
Hirji M & Sanders IR (2005) Low gene copy number shows that arbuscular mycorrhizal
fungi inherit genetically different nuclei. Nature 433: 160-163.
Hijri I, Sykorová Z, Oehl F, Ineichen K, Mäder P, Wiemken A and Redecker D
(2006) Communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in arable soils are not necessarily
low in diversity. Mol Ecol 15: 2277-2289.
Hopple JS, Vilgalys R (1999) Phylogenetic relationships in the mushroom genus
Coprinus and dark-spored allies based on sequence data from the nuclear gene coding for
the large ribosomal subunit RNA: divergent domains, outgroups, and monophyly. Mol
Phylogen Evol 13: 1-19.
Horton TR & Bruns TD (2001) The molecular revolution in ectomycorrhizal ecology:
peeking into the black-box. Mol Ecol 10: 1855-1871.
Horton TR, Cázares E, Bruns TD (1998) Ectomycorrhizal, vesicular-arbuscular and
dark septate dungal colonization of bishop pine (Pinus muricata) seedlings in the first 5
months of growth after wildfire. Mycorrhiza 8: 11-18.
Huber JA, Welch DBM, Morrison HG, Huse SM, Neal PR, Butterfield DA, Sogin
ML (2007) Microbial population structures in the deep marine biosphere. Science 318:
97-100.
Hugenholtz P & Tyson GW (2008) Metagenomics. Nature 455: 481-483.
Hultman J, Ritari J, Romantschuk M, Paulin L, Auvinen P (2008) Universal LigationDetection-Reaction microarray applied for compost microbes. BMC Microbiology 8: 237.
158
Humphrey JW, Newton AC, Peace AJ, Holden E (2000) The importance of conifer
plantations in northern Britain as a habitat for native fungi. Biol Conserv 96: 241-252.
Husband R, Herre EA, Turner L, Gallery R, Young JPW (2002a) Molecular diversity
of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and patterns of host association over time and space in a
tropical forest. Mol Ecol 11: 2669-2678.
Husband R, Herre EA, Young JPW (2002b) Temporal variation in the arbuscular
mycorrhizal communities colonising seedlings in a tropical forest. FEMS Microbiol Ecol
42: 131-136.
Ishida TA, Nara K, Hogetsu T (2007) Host effects on ectomycorrhizal fungal
communities: insight from eight host species inmixed conifer-broadleaf forests. New
Phytol 174: 430-440.
James TY, Kauff F, Schoch CL, Matheny PB, Hofstetter V, Cox CJ, Celio G,
Gueidan C, Fraker E, Miadlikowska J, Lumbsch HT, Rauhut A, Reeb V, Arnold
AE, Amtoft A, Stajich JE, Hosaka K, Sung GH, Johnson D, O'Rourke B, Crockett
M, Binder M, Curtis JM, Slot JC, Wang Z, Wilson AW, Schüssler A, Longcore JE,
O'Donnell K, Mozley-Standridge S, Porter D, Letcher PM, Powell MJ, Taylor JW,
White MM, Griffith GW, Davies DR, Humber RA, Morton JB, Sugiyama J,
Rossman AY, Rogers JD, Pfister DH, Hewitt D, Hansen K, Hambleton S, Shoemaker
RA, Kohlmeyer J, Volkmann-Kohlmeyer B, Spotts RA, Serdani M, Crous PW,
Hughes KW, Matsuura K, Langer E, Langer G, Untereiner WA, Lücking R, Büdel
B, Geiser DM, Aptroot A, Diederich P, Schmitt I, Schultz M, Yahr R, Hibbett DS,
Lutzoni F, McLaughlin DJ, Spatafora JW, Vilgalys R (2006) Reconstructing the early
evolution of fungi using a six-gene phylogeny. Nature 443: 818-822.
Johnson D, Ijdo M, Genney DR, Anderson IC, Alexander IJ (2005) How do plants
regulate the function, community structure, and diversity of mycorrhizal fungi? J Experim
Bot 56: 1751-1760.
Jonsson L, Dahlberg A, Nilsson MC, Kårén O, Zackrisson O (1999a) Continuity of
ectomycorrhizal fungi in self-regenerating boreal Pinus sylvestris forests studied by
comparing mycobiont diversity on seedlings and mature trees. New Phytol 142: 151-162.
Jonsson L, Dahlberg A, Nilsson MC, Zackrisson, O Kårén O (1999b) Ectomycorrhizal
fungal communities in late-successional Swedish boreal forests, and their composition
following wildfire. Mol Ecol 8: 205-215.
Jonsson T, Kokalj S, Finlay R, Erland S (1999c) Ectomycorrhizal community structure
in a limed spruce forest. Mycol Res 103: 501-508.
159
Kõljalg U, Larsson KH, Abarenkov K, Nilsson RH, Alexander IJ, Eberhardt U,
Erland S, Høiland K, Kjøller R, Larsson E, Pennanen T, Sen R, Taylor AFS,
Tedersoo L, Vrålstad T, Ursing BM (2005) UNITE: a database providing web-based
methods for the molecular identification of ectomycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 166: 10631068.
Koide RT, Shumway DL, Xu B, Sharda JN (2007) On temporal partitioning of a
community of ectomycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 174: 420-429.
Kolb TE, Dodds KA, Clancy KM (1999) Effect of westernspruce budworm defoliation
on the physiology and growth of potted Douglas-fir seedlings. For Sci 45: 280-291.
Krpata D, Peintner U, Langer I, Fitz WJ, Schweiger P (2008) Ectomycorrhizal
communitites associated with Populus tremula growing on a heavy metal contaminated
site. Mycol Res 112: 1069-1079.
Kuhn G, Hijri M, Sanders IR (2003) Evidence for the evolution of multiple genomes in
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature 414: 745-748.
Larena I, Salazar O, Gonzalez V, Julian MC, Rubio V (1999) Design of a primer for
ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer with enhanced specificity for ascomycetes. J
Biotechnol 75: 187-194.
Leake JR, Donnelly, Boddy L (2002) Interactions between ectomycorrhizal and
saprotrophic fungi. In: Mycorrhizal Ecology. van der Heijden & Sander IR (eds).
Springer-Verlag. Heidelberg.
Lievens B, Brouwer M, Vanachter A CRC, Lévesque C A, Cammue BPA, Thomma
BPHJ (2003) Design and development of a DNA array for rapid detection and
identification of multiple tomato vascular wilt pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Letters 223:
113-122.
Lilleskov EA, Hobbie EA, Fahey TJ (2002) Ectomycorrhizal fungal taxa differing in
response to nitrogen deposition also differ in pure culture organic nitrogen use and
natural abundance of nitrogen isotopes. New Phytol 154: 219-231.
Lindahl BD, Ihrmark K, Boberg J, Trumbore SE, Högberg P, Stenlid J, Finlay RD
(2007) Spatial distribution of litter decomposition and mycorrhzal nitrogen uptake in a
boreal forest. New Phytol 173: 611-620.
Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J,
Braverman MS, Chen YJ, Chen Z, Dewell SB, Du L, Fierro JM, Gomes XV, Godwin
BC, He W, Helgesen S, Ho CH, Irzyk GP, Jando SC, Alenquer MLI, Jarvie TMP,
Jirage KB, Kim JB, Knight JR, Lanza JR, Leamon JH, Lefkowitz SM, Lei M, Li J,
160
Lohman KL, Lu H, Makhijani VB, McDade KE, McKenna MP, Myers EW,
Nickerson E, Nobile JR, Plant R, Puc BP, Ronan MT, Roth GT, Sarkis GJ, Simons
JF, Simpson JW, Srinivasan M, Tartaro KR, Tomasz A, Vogt KA, Volkmer GA,
Wang SH, Wang Y, Weiner MP, Yu P, Begley RF, Rothberg JM (2005) Genome
sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437: 376-380.
Martin F (2006) Fair trade in the underworld: the ectomycorrhizal symbiosis. In: The
Mycota Vol. VIII, 2nd edition (eds.: RJ Howard & NAR Gow), Springer-Verlag Berlin
Heidelberg 1994, 2006.
Martin F, Díez J, Bell B, Delaruelle C (2002) Phylogeography of the ectomycorrhizal
Pisolithus species as inferred from nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS sequences. New Phytol
153: 345-357.
Martin F, Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Hijri M, Lammers P, Requena N, Sanders IR,
Shachar-Hill Y, Shapiro H, Tuska GA, Young JPW (2008) The long hard road to a
completed Glomus intraradices genome. New Phytol 180: 747-750.
Martin KJ & Rygiewicz PT (2005) Fungal-specific PCR primers developed for analysis
of the ITS region of environmental DNA extracts. BMC Microbiology 5: 28.
Martin F & Selosse MA (2008) The Laccaria genome: a symbiont blueprint decoded.
New Phytologist 180: 296-310.
Mason PA, Last FT, Pelham J, Ingleby K (1982) Ecology of some fungi associated wit
an aging stand of birches (Betula pendla and Betula pubescencs). For Ecol Managem 4:
19-39.
Mauricio R (2005) The ‘bricolage’ of the genome elucidated through evolutionary
genomics. New Phytol 168: 1-4.
Miller SP (2000) Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of semi-aquatic grasses along a
wide hydrologic gradient. New Phytol 145: 145-155.
Mitchell JI & Zuccaro A (2006) Sequences, the environment and fungi. Mycologist 20:
62-74.
Molina R & Trappe JM (1982) Patterns of ectomycorrhizal hst specificity and potential
among Pacific Northwest conifers and fungi. For Science 28: 423-458.
Moncalvo JM, Lutzoni FM, Rehner SA, Johnson J, Vilgalys R (2000) Phylogenetic
relationships of agaric fungi based on nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences.
Syst Biol 49: 278-305.
161
Morris MH, Smith ME, Rizzo DM, Rejmánek M, Bledsoe CS (2008) Contrasting
ectomycorrhizal fungal communities on the roots of co-occurring oaks (Quercus spp.) in a
California woodland. New Phytol 178: 167-176.
Morton JB (1988) Taxonomy of VA mycorrhizal fungi: Classification, nomenclature,
and identification. Mycotaxon 32: 267-324.
Muyzer G (1999) DGGE/TGGE a method for identifying genes from natural ecosystems.
Curr Opin Microbiol 2: 317-322.
Nehls U, Grunze N, Willmann M, Reich M, Kuester H (2007) Sugar for my honey:
Carbohydrate partitioning in ectomycorrhizal symbisosis. Phytochemistry 68: 82-91.
Newsham KK, Fitter AH, Watkinson AR (1995) Multi-functionality and biodiversity in
arbuscular mycorrhizas. Trends Ecol Evol 10: 407-411.
Newton AC & Haigh JM (1998) Diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Britain: a test of
the species-area relationship and the role of host specificity. New Phytol 138: 619-627.
Nilsson RH, Kristiansson E, Ryberg M, Larsson KH (2005) Approaching the
taxonomic affiliation of unidentified sequences in public databases – an example from the
mycorrhizal funig. BMC Bioinform 6: 178.
Nilsson RH, Ryberg M, Kristiansson E, Abarenkov K, Larsson KH, Kõljalg U (2006)
Taxonomic reliability of DNA sequences in public sequence databases: a fungal
perspective. PLoS ONE 1: e59.
Nygren CMR, Eberhardt U, Karlsson M, Parrent JL, Lindahl BD, Taylor AFS
(2008) Growth on nitrate and occurrence of nitrate reductase-encoding genes in a
phylogenetically diverse range of ectomycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 180: 875-889.
O’Brien HE, Parrent JL, Jackson JA, Moncalvo JM, Vilgalys R (2005) Fungal
community analysis by large-scale sequencing of environmental samples. AEM 71: 55445550.
Oehl F, Sieverding E, Ineichen K, Maeder P, Boller T, Wiemken A (2003) Impact of
land use intensity on the species diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in
agroecosystems of central euurope. AEM 69: 2816-2824.
Pang KL & Mitchell J (2005) Molecular approaches for assessing fungal diversity in
marine substrata. Botanica Marina 48: 332-347.
Pawlowska T.E, Taylor JW (2004) Organization of genetic variation in individuals of
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature 427: 733-737.
162
Peter M, Ayer F, Egli S, Honegger R (2001) Above- and below-ground community
structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi in three Norway spruce (Picea abies) stands in
Switzerland. Can J Bot 79: 1134-1151.
Peterson RL, Massicotte HB, Melville LH (2004) Mycorrhizas: Anatomy and cell
biology. NRC Research Press, Ottawa.
Pivato B, Lemanceau P, Siblot S, Berta G, Mougel C, van Tuinen D (2007) Medicago
species affect the community composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with
roots. New Phytol 176: 197-210.
Poinar HN, Schwarz C, Qi J, Shapiro B, MacPhee RDE, Buigues B, Tikhonov A,
Huson DH, Tomsho LP, Auch A, Rampp M, Miller W, Schuster SC (2006)
Metagenomics to paleogenomics: large-scale sequencing of mammoth DNA. Science 311:
392-394.
Pugh GJF (1980) Presidential Address. Strategies in Fungal Ecology. Transactions of the
British Mycological Society 75: 1-14.
Ranger J, Andreux J, Bienaimé SF, Berthelin J, Bonnaud P, Boudot JP, Bréchet C,
Buée M, Calmet JP, Chaussod R, Gelhaye D, Gelhaye L, Gérard F, Jaffrain J,
Lejon D, Le Tacon F, Léveque J, Maurice JP, Merlet D, Moukoumi J, MunierLamy C, Nourrisson G, Pollier B, Ranjard L, Simonsson M, Turpault MP, Vairelles
D, Zeller B (2004) Effet des substitutions d’essence sur le fonctionnement organominéral de l’écosystème forestier, sur les communautés microbiennes et sur la diversité
des communautés fongiques mycorhiziennes et saprophytes (cas du dispositif
expérimental de Breuil-Morvan). Final report of contract INRA-GIP Ecofor 2001- 24, no.
INRA 1502A. INRA BEF Nancy, Champenoux.
Redecker D (2000) Specific PCR primers to identify arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi within
colonized roots. Mycorrhiza 10: 73-80.
Redecker D (2002) Molecular identification and phylogeny of arbuscular mycorrhizal
fungi. Plant and Soil 244: 67-73.
Redecker D, Kodner R, Graham LE (2000) Glomalean fungi from the Ordovician.
Science 289: 1920-1921.
Remy W, Taylor TN, Hass H, Kerp H (1994) Four hundred-million-year-old vesicular
arbuscular mycorrhizae. PNAS 91: 11841-11843.
Rillig MC, Treseder KK, Allen MF (2002) Global change in mycorrhizal fungi. In:
Mycorrhizal Ecology. van der Heijden & Sander IR (eds). Springer-Verlag. Heidelberg.
163
Rineau F (2008) Etude des conséquences du chaulage sur la structure et le
fonctionnement des communautés d’ectomycorrhizes des forêts des Vosges. Doctor thesis
at the university Henri Poincaré of Nancy, France.
Rosendahl S (2008) Communities, populations and individuals of arbuscular mycorrhizal
fungi. New Phytol 178: 253-266.
Rosendahl S, Stukenbrock EH (2004) Community structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal
fungi in undisturbed vegetation revealed by analyses of LSU rDNA sequences. Mol Ecol
13: 3179-3186.
Rosling A, Landeweert R, Lindahl BD, Larsson KH, Kuyper TW, Taylor AFS,
Finlay RD (2003) Vertical distribution of ectomycorrhizal fungal taxa in a podzol soil
profile. New Phytol 159: 775-783.
Rothberg JM & Leamon JH (2008) The development and impact of 454 sequencing.
Nature Biotechn 26: 1117-1124.
Rygiewicz PT, Johnson MG, Ganio LM, Tingey DT, Storm MJ (1997) Lifetime and
temporal occurrence of ectomycorrhizae on ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Laws.)
seedlings grown under varied atmospheric CO2 and nitrogen levels. Plant and Soil 189:
275-287.
Saiki RK, Walsh PS, Levenson CH, Erlich HA (1989) Genetic analysis of amplified
DNA with immobilized sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes. PNAS 86: 6230-6234.
Sanders IR, Alt M, Groppe K, Boller T, Wiemken T (1995) Identification of ribosomal
DNA polymorphisms among and within spores of the Glomales: application to studies on
the gentic diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. New Phytol 130: 419427.
Sanger F & Coulson AR (1975) A rapid method for determining sequences in DNA by
primed synthesis with DNA polymerase. J Mol Biol 94: 441-461.
Schena M, Shalon D, Davis RW, Brown PO (1995) Quantitative monitoring of gene
expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 270: 467-470.
Schüßler A, Schwarzott D, Walker C (2001) A new fungal phylum, the
Glomeromycota: phylogeny and evolution. Mycol Res 105: 1413-1421.
Selosse MA & Le Tacon F (1998) The land flora: a phototroph-fungus partnership?
Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 15-20.
Selosse MA, Setaro S, Glatard F, Richard F, Urcelay C, Weiss M (2007) Sebacinales
are common mycorrhizal associates of Ericaceae. New Phytol 174: 864-878.
164
Sessitsch A, Hackl E, Wenzl P, Kilian A, Kostic T, Stralis-Pavese N, Sandjong BT,
Bodrossy L (2006) Diagnostic microbial microarrays in soil ecology. New Phytol 171:
719-736.
Shiu SH & Borevitz JO (2008) The next generation of microarray research: applications
in evolutionary and ecological genomics. Heredity 100: 141-149.
Smith SE & Read DJ (2008) Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. 3rd edition. Academic Press. San
Diego, USA.
Sogin ML, Morrison HG, Huber JA, Welch DM, Huse SM, Neal PR, Arrieta JM,
Herndl GJ (2006) Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored
“rare”biosphere”. PNAS 103: 12115-12120.
Stabler RA, Dawson LF, Oyston PCF, Titball RW, Wade J, Hinds J, Witney AA,
Brendan WW (2008) Development and application of the active surveillance of
pathogens microarray to monitor bacterial gene flux. BMC Microbiol 8: 177.
Sukumar R (2008) Forest research for the 21st century. Science 320: 1395.
Takumasu S, Aoki T, Oberwinkler F (1994) Fungal succession on pine needles in
Germany. Mycoscience 35: 29-37.
Tambong JT, de Cock AWAM, Tinker NA, Lévesque CA (2006) Oligonucleotide
array for identification and detection of Phytium species. AEM 72: 2691-2706.
Taylor AFS & Alexander I (2005) The ectomycorrhizal symbiosis: life in the real world.
Mycologist 19: 102-112.
Taylor DL & Bruns TD (1999) Community structure of ecto-mycorrhizal fungi in a
Pinus muricata forest: minimal overlap between the mature forest and resistant propagule
communities. Mol Ecol 8: 1837-1850.
Tedersoo L, Jairus T, Horton BM, Abarenkov K, Suvi T, Saar I, Kõljalg U (2008)
Strong host preference of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a Tasmanian wet sclerophyll forest as
revealed by DNA barcoding and taxon-specific primers. New Phytol 180: 479-490.
Tedersoo L, Suivi T, Jairus T, Ostonen I, Põlme S (2009) Revisting ecotmycorrhizal
fungi of the genus Alnus: differential host specificity, diversity and determinants of the
fungal community. New Phytologist (doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02792.x).
Tedersoo L, Suvi T, Larsson E, Kõljalg U (2006) Diversity and community of
ectomycorrhizal fungi in a wooded meadow. Mycol Res 110: 734-748.
Toljander JF, Santos-González JC, Tehler A, Finlay RD (2008) Community analysis
of arbuscula rmycorrhizal fungi and bacteria in the maize mycorrhizosphere in a longterm fertilization trial. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 65: 323-338.
165
Trombetti G A, Bonnal R JP, Rizzi E, De Bellis G, Milanesi L (2007) Data handling
strategies for high throughput pyrosequencers. BMC Bioinf 8: S22.
Turnau K, Ryszka P, Gianinazzi-Pearson V, van Tuinen D (2001) Identification of
arbuscular mycorrhiyal fungi in soils and roots of plants colonizing zinc wastes in
southern Poland. Mycorrhiza 10: 169-174.
Vandenkoornhuyse P, Ridgway K, Watson IJ, Fitter AH, Young JPW (2003) Coexisting grass species have distinctive arbuscular mycorrhizal communities. Mol Ecol 12:
3085-3095.
van der Heijden MGA & Sanders IR (2002) Mycorrhizal Ecology. Springer-Verlag
Berlin, Heidelberg.
van Tuinen D, Jacquot E, Zhao B, Gollotte A, Gianinazzi-Pearson V (1998)
Characterization of root colonization profiles by a microsom community of arbuscular
mycorrhizal fungi using 25S rDNA-targeted nested PCR. Mol Ecol 7: 879-887.
Villeneuve N, Grandtner MM, Fortin JA (1989) Frequency and diversity of
ectomycorrhizal and saprophytic macrofungi in the Laurentide Mountains of Quebec. Can
J Bot 67: 2616-2629.
Wagner M, Smidt H, Loy A, Zhou J (2007) Unravelling microbial communities with
DNA-microarrays: challenges and future directions. Microb Ecol 53: 498-506.
Walker C (1992) Systematics and taxonomy of the arbuscular endomycorrhizal fungi
(Glomales) – a possible way forward. Agronomie 12: 887-897.
Wallenda T & Kottke I (1998) Nitrogen deposition and ectomycorrhizas. New Phytol
139: 169-187.
Wearn JA & Gange AC (2007) Above-ground herbivory causes rapid and sustained
changes in mycorrhizal colonization of grasses. Oecologia 153: 959-971.
Weidler GW, Dornmayr-Pfaffenhuemer M, Gerbl FW, Heinen W, Stan-Lotter H
(2007) Communities of Archaea and Bacteria in a subsurface radioactive thermal spring
in the austrian central alps, and evidence of ammonia-oxidizing Crenarchaeota. AEM 73:
259-270.
Weiss M, Selosse MA, Rexer KH, Urban A, Oberwinkler F (2004) Sebacinales: a
hitherto overlooked cosm of heterobasidiomycetes with a broad mycorrhizal potential.
Mycol Res 108: 1003-1010.
Wheeler DA, Srinivasan M, Egholm M, Shen Y, Chen L, McGuire A, He W, Chen
YJ, Makhijani V, Roth GT, Gomes X, Tartaro K, Niazi F, Turcotte CL, Irzyk GP,
Lupski JR, Chinault C, Song XZ, Liu Y, Yuan Y, Nazareth L, Qin X, Muzny DM,
166
Margulies M, Weinstock GM, Gibbs RA, Rothberg JM (2008) The complete genome
of an indvidual by massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nature 452: 872-877.
White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Analysis of phylogenetic relationships by
amplification and direct sequencing of ribosomal RNA genes. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH,
Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds), PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications.
Academic Press, New York, USA, pp. 315-322.
Whitham TG, Bailey JK, Schweitzer JA, Shuster SM, Bangert RK, LeRoy CJ,
Lonsdorf EV, Allan GJ, DiFazio SP, Potts BM, Fischer DG, Gehring CA, Lindroth
RL, Marks JC, Hart SC, Wimp GM, Wooley SC (2006) A framework for community
and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystems. Nature Reviews Genetics 7: 510-523.
Whitham TG, DiFazio SP, Schweitzer JA, Shuster SM, Allan GJ, Bailey JK,
Woolbright SC (2008) Extending genomics to natural communities and ecosystems.
Science 320: 492-495.
Wicker T, Schlagenhauf E, Graner A, Close T J, Keller B, Stein N (2006) 454
sequencing put to the test using the complex genome of barley. BMC Genomics 7: 275.
Wolf J, Johnson NC, Rowland DL, Reich PB (2003) Elevated CO2 and plant species
richness impact arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal spore communities. New Phytol 157: 579588.
Wu B, Hogetsu T, Isobe K, Ishii R (2007) community structures of arbuscular
mycorrhizal fungi in a primary seccessional volcanic desert on the southeast slope of
Mount Fuji. Mycorrhiza 17: 495-506.
Wubet T, Weiß M, Kottke I, Oberwinkler F (2006) Two threatened coexisting
indigenous conifer species in the dry Afromontane forests of Ethiopia are associated with
distinct arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. Can J Bot 84: 1617-1627.
Wubet T, Weiß M, Kottke I, Teketay D, Oberwinkler F (2003) Molecular diversity of
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Prunus africana, an endangered medicinal tree species in
dry Afromontane forests of Ethiopia. New Phytol 161: 517-528.
Xu JR, Peng YL, Dickman M B, Sharon A (2006) The dawn of fungal pathogen
genomics. Annu Rev Phytopathol 44: 337-366.
Yamada K, Lim J, Dale JM, Chen H, Shinn P, Palm CJ, Southwick AM, Wu HC,
Kim C, Nguyen M, Pham P, Cheuk R, Karlin-Newmann G, Liu SX, Lam B, Sakano
H, Wu T, Yu G, Miranda M, Quach HL, Tripp M, Chang CH, Lee JM, Toriumi M,
Chan MMH, Tang CC, Onodera CS, Deng JM, Akiyama K,Ansar Y, Arakawa T,
Banh J, Banno F, Bowser L, Brooks S, Carninci P, Chao Q, Choy N, Enju A,
167
Goldsmith AD, Gurjal M, Hansen NF, Hayashizaki Y, Johnson-Hopson C, Hsuan
VW, Iida K, Karnes M, Khan S, Koesema E, Ishida J, Jiang PX, Jones T, Kawai J,
Kamiya A, Meyers C, Nakajima M, Narusaka M, Seki M, Sakurai T, Satou M,
Tamse R, Vaysberg M, Wallender EK, Wong C, Yamamura Y, Yuan S, Shinozaki
K, Davis RW, Theologis A, Ecker JR (2003) Empirical analysis of transcriptional
activity in the Arabidopsis genome. Science 302: 842-846.
Young JPW (2008) The genetic diversity of intraterrestrial aliens. New Phytol 178: 465468.
Zareia M, König S, Hempel S, Nekoueic MK, Savaghebia G, Buscot F (2008)
Community structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated to Veronica rechingeri at
the Anguran zinc and lead mining region. Environm Pollution 156: 1277-1283.
Zhou D & Hyde K (2001) Host-specificity, host-exclusivity, and host-recurrence in
saprobic fungi. Mycol Res 105: 1449-1457.