International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (2010), 60, 1060–1065
DOI 10.1099/ijs.0.014746-0
Desulfosalsimonas propionicica gen. nov., sp. nov.,
a halophilic, sulfate-reducing member of the family
Desulfobacteraceae isolated from a salt-lake
sediment
Kasper Urup Kjeldsen,13 Trine Fredlund Jakobsen,1 Jens Glastrup2
and Kjeld Ingvorsen1
Correspondence
Kjeld Ingvorsen
kjeld.ingvorsen@biology.au.dk
1
Department of Biological Sciences, Microbiology, University of Aarhus, Ny Munkegade 114,
Building 1540, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
2
Department of Conservation, The National Museum of Denmark, Brede 260, DK-2800 Lyngby,
Denmark
A novel halophilic Gram-negative sulfate-reducing bacterium affiliated with the
deltaproteobacterial family Desulfobacteraceae, strain PropAT, was isolated from the extreme
hypersaline sediment of the northern arm of Great Salt Lake, Utah, USA. Comparative 16S rRNA
gene sequence analysis showed that strain PropAT is the first cultured representative of a clade of
phylotypes that have been retrieved from a range of geographically and ecologically distinct
hypersaline environments. Strain PropAT shared ¡90 % 16S rRNA gene sequence identity with
cultured strains within the family Desulfobacteraceae. Cells of strain PropAT were rod-shaped and
sometimes motile. The strain required NaCl for growth and grew at salinities up to 200 g NaCl l”1
(optimum 60 g l”1). Growth was observed at 15–40 6C, optimum growth occurred at about
40 6C, while growth was absent at 10 and 45 6C. The pH range for growth was pH 6.0–8.3.
Yeast extract (0.1 g l”1) was required for growth. C2–4 alcohols, C3–4 carboxylic acids, yeast
extract and H2/acetate supported growth with sulfate as electron acceptor. Sulfate, thiosulfate
and sulfite served as electron acceptors, but not elemental sulfur, nitrate or fumarate. The DNA
G+C content of strain PropAT was 54.1 mol%. Based on the genotypic and physiological
properties, we propose that strain PropAT represents a novel species within a novel genus,
Desulfosalsimonas propionicica gen. nov., sp. nov. The type strain of Desulfosalsimonas
propionicica is PropAT (5DSM 17721T 5VKM B-2385T).
Aquatic systems such as solar salterns, inland lakes and deepsea brines are characterized by salinities far exceeding 100 g
NaCl l21 (Oren, 2002). Sulfate reduction is often an
important anoxic mineralization process in these hypersaline
environments (Brandt et al., 2001; Daffonchio et al., 2006;
Foti et al., 2007), yet relatively few sulfate-reducing bacteria
3Present address: Center for Geomicrobiology, Department of
Biological Sciences, University of Aarhus, Ny Munkegade 114,
Building 1540, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Abbreviations: SPME-GC-MS, solid-phase micro-extraction gas chromatography mass spectrometry; SRB, sulfate-reducing bacteria.
The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene
and dsrAB sequences of strain PropAT are DQ067422 and DQ386237,
respectively.
Transmission electron micrographs of cells of strain PropAT and details
of sequences shown as genus groups and sequences constituting
outgroups in Fig. 2 are available as supplementary material with the
online version of this paper.
1060
(SRB) that are able to grow at such extreme salinities are
known. Halophilic SRB primarily comprise members of the
families Desulfohalobiaceae (Kuever et al., 2005a) and
Desulfonatronaceae (Kuever et al., 2005b) along with certain members of the genus Desulfovibrio of the family
Desulfovibrionaceae (e.g., Sass & Cypionka, 2004; Krekeler
et al., 1997). Members of the family Desulfohalobiaceae
exhibit the highest known in vitro halotolerance and are able
to grow in the presence of up to 240 g NaCl l21 (Beliakova et
al., 2006; Jakobsen et al., 2006; Ollivier et al., 1991). Here, we
describe a novel halophilic SRB, designated strain PropAT,
which is affiliated with the deltaproteobacterial family
Desulfobacteraceae (Kuever et al., 2005c). Only three
recognized members of the family Desulfobacteraceae are
capable of growing at NaCl concentrations exceeding
100 g l21, namely Desulfocella halophila (Brandt et al.,
1999), Desulfobacter halotolerans (Brandt & Ingvorsen, 1997)
and Desulfotignum balticum (Drzyzga et al., 1993; Kuever
et al., 2001) (Table 1). The first two species, like strain
014746 G 2010 IUMS Printed in Great Britain
Desulfosalsimonas propionicica gen. nov., sp. nov.
Table 1. Differential phenotypic characteristics between strain PropAT and the three other
members of the family Desulfobacteraceae that grow at salinities ¢100 g NaCl l”1
Strains: 1, Desulfosalsimonas propionicica gen. nov., sp. nov. PropAT; 2, Desulfobacter halotolerans DSM 11383T;
3, Desulfocella halophila DSM 11763T; 4, Desulfotignum balticum DSM 7044T. Data for reference strains were
taken from Brandt & Ingvorsen (1997), Brandt et al. (1999), Drzyzga et al. (1993) and Kuever et al. (2001).
+, Positive; 2, negative; ND, no data available.
Characteristic
NaCl concentration for growth (g l )
Range
Optimum
Temperature for growth (uC)
Range
Optimum
pH for growth
Range
Optimum
Oxidation of:
Acetate
Propionate
Lactate
Butyrate
Isobutyrate
Formate
Fumarate
Succinate
Malate
Ethanol
Propanol
Butanol
Benzoate
Glucose
H2/CO2
H2/acetate
Yeast extract
Fermentation
Reduction of:
Sulfite
Thiosulfate
Elemental sulfur
Autotrophic growth
Complete oxidation of carbon
compounds
DNA G+C content (mol%)
1
2
3
4
10–200
60
5–130
10–20
20–200
40–50
10–110
20
15–40
~40
7–38
33
14–37
34
10–42
28–32
6.0–8.3
~7.0
6.2–8.1
6.2–7.4
5.8–7.6
6.5–7.3
6.5–8.2
7.3
2
+
+
+
+
2
+
2
2
+
+
+
2
2
2
+
+
2
+
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
+
2
2
2
2
2
2
ND
+
2
+
+
2
+
+
+
+
2
2
2
+
2
+
+
ND
+
2
+ (pyruvate)
+
+
2
2
+/2
+
+
2
2
+
2
2
2
2
2
ND
54
49
35
53
21
ND
2
2
+
2
ND
2
ND
2
+
2
PropAT, were isolated from the hypersaline Great Salt Lake
(Utah, USA), which is characterized by salinities of 120 and
270 g NaCl l21 in its southern and northern parts,
respectively (Brandt et al., 2001; Oren, 2002). In contrast,
the aromatic compound-degrading species Desulfotignum
balticum, which exhibits the lowest halotolerance of the three
above-mentioned species, was isolated from a marine coastal
sediment. Being able to grow at salinities up to 200 g
NaCl l21, strain PropAT is, together with Desulfocella
halophila, the most halotolerant member of the family
Desulfobacteraceae described so far. Notably, the 16S rRNA
gene sequence of strain PropAT clusters within a clade of
uncultured phylotypes derived from various hypersaline
http://ijs.sgmjournals.org
ND
2
2
2
2
ND
+
+
+
+
environments. Thus, strain PropAT provides the first insights
into the physiology of this distinct group of unknown
members of the Desulfobacteraceae.
Strain PropAT was isolated from hypersaline (270 g
NaCl l21) sediment of the northern arm of Great Salt
Lake as part of an investigation of the diversity of SRB in
this extreme habitat (Kjeldsen et al., 2007). Strain PropAT
was enriched, isolated and routinely cultivated in anoxic
basal medium containing 100 g NaCl l21, prepared as
described previously (Jakobsen et al., 2006). Propionate
served as the electron donor for enrichment and isolation.
All incubations were carried out in the dark at 30 uC,
1061
K. U. Kjeldsen and others
unless otherwise noted. Growth experiments and transmission electron microscopy were performed essentially as
described previously (Jakobsen et al., 2006). Lactate served
as the electron donor for NaCl, pH and temperature
experiments, whereas propionate was used as the electron
donor for electron acceptor experiments.
Cells of strain PropAT were rod shaped, and swimming
motility was sometimes observed. Cells were 0.8–1.0 mm
wide and 2–4 mm long and sometimes formed short
filaments under routine growth conditions (Supplementary
Fig. S1, available in IJSEM Online). The cells stained Gramnegative and did not form endospores. Growth was tested at
13 different salinities, ranging from 0 to 250 g NaCl l21, and
was found to occur at 10–200 g NaCl l21, with an optimum
growth rate at 60 g NaCl l21 (Fig. 1). Thus, according to the
definitions of Larsen (1986), strain PropAT is a moderate
halophile. The observed upper in vitro salinity limit for
growth indicates that strain PropAT may be severely salt
stressed in the sediment of the northern part of Great Salt
Lake (270 g NaCl l21) from where it was isolated. Perhaps
the strain is more active in the southern part of the lake, in
which the salinity is only 120 g NaCl l21, or perhaps the
sediment in the northern part contains niches of lower
salinity, possibly arising from freshwater seeps, as previously
speculated (Kjeldsen et al., 2007). Discrepancies between the
in vitro halotolerance of halophilic SRB and the in situ
salinity of their habitat are, however, not unprecedented (Jakobsen et al., 2006; Ollivier et al., 1991; Sass &
Cypionka, 2004). The pH dependence of growth was
determined at eight different values ranging from pH 5.0
to 8.5. Growth was observed between pH 6.0 and 8.3, with
an optimum at about pH 7.0. The temperature dependence
of growth was tested at 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 45, 50 and 60 uC.
Growth was observed at 15–40 uC, with the fastest growth
occurring at 40 uC. No growth was observed at 45 uC.
H2/acetate and yeast extract (2 g l21) as electron donors.
The strain required yeast extract (0.1 g l21) for growth
irrespective of the type of electron donor provided,
including H2/acetate. This requirement was evident despite
the routine amendment of the growth medium with the
following defined trace element and vitamin solutions
(Widdel & Bak, 1992): non-chelated trace element mixture,
selenite–tungstate solution, thiamine solution, vitamin
mixture (modified by including 30 mg folic acid l21) and
vitamin B12 solution. The following substrates did not
support growth: D-glucose, D-galactose, trehalose, D-xylose,
D-arabinose, L-rhamnose, sucrose, D-fructose, maltose,
D-mannose, methanol, 1-pentanol, acetone, formate,
acetate, citrate, succinate, DL-malate, glycine, glycerol,
choline, benzoate, caprylate and Casamino acids. Besides
sulfate, strain PropAT grew with sulfite and thiosulfate as
electron acceptors, but not nitrate, elemental sulfur or
fumarate. Growth was absent in the presence of oxygen.
Fermentative growth was absent on pyruvate, fumarate and
lactate. By comparing the substrate spectrum of strain
PropAT with those of Desulfobacter halotolerans and
Desulfocella halophila, the two other halophilic members
of the family Desulfobacteraceae previously isolated from
Great Salt Lake, it appears that strain PropAT is
metabolically the most versatile of the three (Table 1).
This versatility might explain how several strains closely
related to strain PropAT seemingly coexist in the Great Salt
Lake sediment (Kjeldsen et al., 2007).
Fig. 1. Effect of NaCl on the specific growth rate of strain PropAT,
when grown at 30 6C at pH 7.0 on lactate and sulfate.
The capacity of strain PropAT to oxidize lactate, propionate, ethanol and propanol completely to CO2 was tested
in triplicate growth experiments in which the concentration of acetate was measured at the beginning and end of
the experiments along with the concentration of sulfate.
Sulfate concentrations were determined using a BioLC ion
chromatograph (Dionex) equipped with a 46250 mm
IonPac AS18 column (Dionex) at an eluent (23 mM KOH)
flow rate of 1 ml h–1. Acetate was measured by automated
solid-phase micro-extraction gas chromatography mass
spectrometry (SPME-GC-MS) directly from the growth
medium (Glastrup et al., 2006). In contrast to ion
chromatography-based measurements of acetate, SPMEGC-MS measurements are not affected by the high
concentration of chloride in the growth medium. Acetate
did not accumulate (detection limit 5 mM) with growth on
lactate or propionate, despite the consumption of 4–8 mM
sulfate, suggesting that these carboxylic acids were oxidized
completely. In contrast, the alcohols ethanol and propanol
were oxidized incompletely, resulting in the accumulation
of approximately stoichiometric amounts of acetate and
propionate, respectively (quantified by SPME-GC-MS).
Even though propionate and lactate were oxidized
completely by strain PropAT, acetate did not support
growth, possibly due to the low energy yield gained from
the oxidation of this substrate and the high energetic cost
of maintaining the osmotic balance in a saline growth
medium (Oren, 1999). Similar observations have been
made, for example, for the completely oxidizing SRB
1062
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 60
Strain PropAT utilized short-chain carboxylic acids (propionate, pyruvate, lactate, butyrate, isobutyrate and
fumarate) and alcohols (ethanol, 1-propanol, 1-butanol),
Desulfosalsimonas propionicica gen. nov., sp. nov.
Desulfatibacillum alkenivorans (Cravo-Laureau et al., 2004),
Desulfobacula toluolica (Rabus et al., 1993) and Desulfospira
joergensenii (Finster et al., 1997), which also belong to the
family Desulfobacteraceae.
The sequences for dsrAB, which encodes the two major
subunits of dissimilatory (bi)sulfite reductase (Wagner et al.,
2005), and the 16S rRNA gene (1946 and 1469 nt,
respectively) of strain PropAT were retrieved as described
previously (Kjeldsen et al., 2007). The 16S rRNA gene
sequence was added to the alignment of the Silva SSURef
version 95 ARB database (Pruesse et al., 2007) containing
.4500 high-quality deltaproteobacterial 16S rRNA gene
sequences. A few additional short or recently published
sequences that were found to be related to the 16S rRNA gene
sequence of strain PropAT by BLAST searches of the GenBank
database were added manually to the ARB database. From this
database, 51 sequences affiliated to the Desulfobacteraceae
were subsequently selected for phylogenetic analyses.
Furthermore, 14 sequences representing other major deltaproteobacterial families were included as an outgroup. The
phylogenetic position of strain PropAT among the selected
taxa was inferred from Bayesian analysis using MrBayes
version 3.1.2 (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck, 2003) with sampling
of 1395 unambigously aligned sequence positions. Tree
searches were performed with the general time reversible
evolutionary model with gamma-distributed rate variation
across sites, with a proportion of the sites being kept
invariable. Program default priors on model parameters as
well as default settings for the Metropolis-coupled Markov
chain Monte Carlo runs were applied. Searches included
1 million generations with a sampling of trees for every 100.
Likelihood values converged after approximately 100 000
generations. A consensus tree was constructed after removing
the first 2500 trees as ‘burn-in’. Distance-matrix-based
bootstrap values were calculated in PAUP* version 4.0b10
(Swofford, 2003) using Jukes–Cantor distance correction and
1000 resamplings. Phylogenetic analysis of a dataset consisting
of 50 DsrAB amino acid sequences (deduced from nucleotide
sequences) with 563 unambiguously aligned sequence positions were performed using the TreePuzzle (quartet puzzling
using a JTT amino acid substitution model) algorithm as
implemented in the ARB program package (Ludwig et al.,
2004). Some taxa were grouped or removed from the trees
presented in Fig. 2 in order to enhance clarity (details of
grouped and removed sequences are given in Supplementary
Table S1).
The 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain PropAT shared
¡90 % similarity with sequences originating from
named isolates. Its closest cultured relatives (89–90 %
identity) were various members of the deltaproteobacterial
family Desulfobacteraceae, particularly members of the
genera Desulfatibacillum, Desulfobacterium, Desulfococcus,
Desulfofaba, Desulfonema and Desulfosarcina, which are
mostly associated with marine habitats (Cravo-Laureau
et al., 2004; Kuever et al., 2005c). The 16S rRNA gene and
DsrAB amino acid sequence-based phylogenetic analyses
clearly placed the strain within the family Desulfobacteraceae
http://ijs.sgmjournals.org
(Fig. 2). This family mainly includes SRB that, like strain
PropAT, possess the capacity to oxidize carbon compounds
completely (Kuever et al., 2005c). As seen from Fig. 2,
neither the 16S rRNA gene sequence nor the DsrAB amino
acid sequence of strain PropAT clustered with any
recognized member of the family Desulfobacteraceae.
Rather, the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain PropAT
formed a clade with a range of environmentally derived
sequences that, interestingly, all originate from hypersaline
environments, representing different habitat types such as
sediments, microbial mats and anoxic basins (Fig. 2a). Thus,
strain PropAT is the first cultured representative of what
seems to be a geographically and ecologically widely
distributed lineage of putative halophilic SRB.
The DNA G+C content of strain PropAT was 54.1 mol%,
as determined by HPLC analysis by the Identification
Service of the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen
und Zellculturen (Braunschweig, Germany). The DNA
G+C content varies considerably, from 35 to 62 mol%,
among members of the family Desulfobacteraceae (Kuever
et al., 2005c). The mean±SD DNA G+C content for
recognized members of the family is 49.6±6.3 mol%
(41 species representing 16 genera; results not shown) and,
consequently, the value of 54.1 mol% determined for strain
PropAT is in good agreement with G+C contents reported
for the family Desulfobacteraceae.
In conclusion, we propose that strain PropAT should be
classified in a novel genus and species as Desulfosalsimonas
propionicica gen. nov., sp. nov. within the family
Desulfobacteraceae because of its distant phylogenetic
relatedness to recognized members of this family and its
unique halotolerance.
Description of Desulfosalsimonas gen. nov.
Desulfosalsimonas [De.sul9fo.sal.si.mo9nas. L. pref. de from;
L. n. sulfur sulfur; L. adj. salsus salty, saline; L. fem. n. monas
unit, monad; N.L. fem. n. Desulfosalsimonas a sulfatereducing monad that thrives in (hyper)saline environments].
Obligately anaerobic, sulfate-reducing chemoheterotrophs.
Cells are rod-shaped, stain Gram-negative and do not
produce endospores. Short-chain carboxylic acids, primary
C2–4 alcohols and H2 serve as electron donors. Optimal
growth occurs in the presence of elevated concentrations of
NaCl at neutral pH and at mesophilic temperatures.
Phylogenetically, the genus belongs to the deltaproteobacterial family Desulfobacteraceae, as can be recognized by
both dsrAB and 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses. The
type species is Desulfosalsimonas propionicica.
Description of Desulfosalsimonas propionicica
sp. nov.
Desulfosalsimonas propionicica (pro.pi.o.ni.ci9ca. N.L. n.
acidum propionicum propionic acid; L. fem. suff. -ica suffix
used with the sense of pertaining to; N.L. fem. adj.
propionicica belonging to propionic acid).
1063
K. U. Kjeldsen and others
Fig. 2. Trees showing the inferred phylogenetic position of strain PropAT among members of the family Desulfobacteraceae
based on comparative analyses of 16S rRNA gene sequences (a) and DsrAB amino acid sequences (b). For the 16S RNA gene
sequence tree, bootstrap percentage values and Bayesian posterior probability percentages (.50 %) are shown above and
below branch nodes, respectively. For the DsrAB amino acid sequence tree, percentages at nodes are levels of bootstrap
support. Numbers in square brackets indicate the number of taxa constituting the group. #, Short sequences subsequently
added to the tree without changing the overall tree topology using parsimony criteria. Bars, 10 % sequence divergence. Details
of sequences represented as genus groups and outgroups are available in Supplementary Table S1.
The species has the following characteristics in addition to
those listed for the genus. Cells are 0.8–1.0 mm wide and
2–4 mm long, sometimes forming filaments. Utilizes (with
sulfate as electron acceptor) propionate, pyruvate, lactate,
butyrate, isobutyrate, fumarate, ethanol, 1-propanol,
1-butanol, yeast extract and H2/acetate. Oxidizes lactate
and propionate completely and ethanol and propanol
incompletely. Acetate does not support growth. Yeast
extract is required for growth. In addition to sulfate,
thiosulfate and sulfite serve as electron acceptors. NaCl is
required for growth and up to 200 g NaCl l21 is tolerated;
the optimum concentration for growth is 60 g l21. Growth
occurs within the range pH 6.0–8.3. Growth occurs at 15–
40 uC (optimum about 40 uC); growth is absent at 10 and
45 uC. The DNA G+C content of the type strain is
54.1 mol%.
The type strain, PropAT (5DSM 17721T 5VKM B-2385T),
was isolated from the extreme hypersaline sediment of the
northern arm of Great Salt Lake, Utah, USA.
1064
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 60
Acknowledgements
We thank Tove Wiegers and Britta Poulsen for excellent technical
assistance.
References
Beliakova, E. V., Rozanova, E. P., Borzenkov, I. A., Tourova, T. P.,
Pusheva, M. A., Lysenko, A. M. & Kolganova, T. V. (2006). The new
facultatively chemolithoautotrophic, moderately halophilic, sulfatereducing bacterium Desulfovermiculus halophilus gen. nov., sp. nov.,
isolated from an oil field. Mikrobiologiia 75, 201–211 (in Russian).
Desulfosalsimonas propionicica gen. nov., sp. nov.
Brandt, K. K. & Ingvorsen, K. (1997). Desulfobacter halotolerans sp.
Kuever, J., Rainey, F. A. & Widdel, F. (2005a). Family III.
nov., a halotolerant acetate-oxidizing sulfate-reducing bacterium
isolated from sediments of Great Salt Lake, Utah. Syst Appl Microbiol
20, 366–373.
Desulfohalobiaceae fam. nov. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic
Bacteriology, 2nd edn, vol. 2, part C, pp. 948–949. Edited by D. J.
Brenner, N. R. Krieg, J. T. Staley & G. M. Garrity. New York:
Springer.
Brandt, K. K., Patel, B. K. C. & Ingvorsen, K. (1999). Desulfocella
halophila gen. nov., sp. nov., a halophilic, fatty-acid-oxidizing,
sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from sediments of the Great
Salt Lake. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49, 193–200.
Brandt, K. K., Vester, F., Jensen, A. N. & Ingvorsen, K. (2001). Sulfate
reduction dynamics and enumeration of sulfate-reducing bacteria in
hypersaline sediments of the Great Salt Lake (Utah, USA). Microb Ecol
41, 1–11.
Cravo-Laureau, C., Matheron, R., Joulian, C., Cayol, J.-L. & HirschlerRéa, A. (2004). Desulfatibacillum alkenivorans sp. nov., a novel n-
alkene-degrading, sulfate-reducing bacterium, and emended description of the genus Desulfatibacillum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54, 1639–
1642.
Daffonchio, D., Borin, S., Brusa, T., Brusetti, L., van der Wielen, P. W.,
Bolhuis, H., Yakimov, M. M., D’Auria, G., Giuliano, L. & other authors
(2006). Stratified prokaryote network in the oxic-anoxic transition of
a deep-sea halocline. Nature 440, 203–207.
Kuever, J., Rainey, F. A. & Widdel, F. (2005b). Family IV.
Desulfonatronaceae fam. nov. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic
Bacteriology, 2nd edn, vol. 2, part C, p. 956. Edited by D. J.
Brenner, N. R. Krieg, J. T. Staley & G. M. Garrity. New York:
Springer.
Kuever, J., Rainey, F. A. & Widdel, F. (2005c). Family I.
Desulfobacteraceae fam. nov. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic
Bacteriology, 2nd edn, vol. 2, part C, pp. 959–960. Edited by D. J.
Brenner, N. R. Krieg, J. T. Staley & G. M. Garrity. New York:
Springer.
Larsen, H. (1986). Halophilic and halotolerant microorganisms:
an overview and historical perspective. FEMS Microbiol Lett 39,
3–7.
Ludwig, W., Strunk, O., Westram, R., Richter, L., Meier, H.,
Yadhukumar, Buchner, A., Lai, T., Steppi, S. & other authors
(2004). ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids
Drzyzga, O., Kuever, J. & Blotevogel, K. H. (1993). Complete
Res 32, 1363–1371.
oxidation of benzoate and 4-hydroxybenzoate by a new sulfatereducing bacterium resembling Desulfoarculus. Arch Microbiol 159,
109–113.
Ollivier, B., Hatchikian, C. E., Prensier, G., Guezennec, J. & Garcia,
J.-L. (1991). Desulfohalobium retbaense gen. nov., sp. nov., a halophilic
Finster, K., Liesack, W. & Tindall, B. J. (1997). Desulfospira
joergensenii, gen. nov., sp. nov., a new sulfate-reducing bacterium
isolated from marine surface sediment. Syst Appl Microbiol 20, 201–
208.
Foti, M., Sorokin, D. Y., Lomans, B., Mußmann, M., Zacharova, E. E.,
Pimenov, N. V., Kuenen, J. G. & Muyzer, G. (2007). Diversity, activity,
and abundance of sulfate-reducing bacteria in saline and hypersaline
soda lakes. Appl Environ Microbiol 73, 2093–2100.
Glastrup, J., Shashoua, Y., Egsgaard, H. & Mortensen, M. N. (2006).
Formic and acetic acids in archaeological wood. A comparison
between the Vasa warship, the Bremen cog, the Oberländer boat and
the Danish viking ships. Holzforschung 60, 259–264.
Jakobsen, T. F., Kjeldsen, K. U. & Ingvorsen, K. (2006).
Desulfohalobium utahense sp. nov., a moderately halophilic sulfatereducing bacterium isolated from Great Salt Lake. Int J Syst Evol
Microbiol 56, 2063–2069.
Kjeldsen, K. U., Loy, A., Jakobsen, T. F., Thomsen, T. R., Wagner, M. &
Ingvorsen, K. (2007). Diversity of sulfate-reducing bacteria from an
extreme hypersaline sediment, Great Salt Lake (Utah). FEMS
Microbiol Ecol 60, 287–298.
Krekeler, D., Sigalevich, P., Teske, A., Cypionka, H. & Cohen, Y.
(1997). A sulfate-reducing bacterium from the oxic layer of a
microbial mat from Solar Lake (Sinai), Desulfovibrio oxyclinae sp. nov.
Arch Microbiol 167, 369–375.
sulfate-reducing bacterium from sediments of a hypersaline lake in
Senegal. Int J Syst Bacteriol 41, 74–81.
Oren, A. (1999). Bioenergetic aspects of halophilism. Microbiol Mol
Biol Rev 63, 334–348.
Oren, A. (2002). Halophilic Microorganisms and their Environments.
Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Pruesse, E., Quast, C., Knittel, K., Fuchs, B. M., Ludwig, W.,
Peplies, J. & Glöckner, F. O. (2007). SILVA: a comprehensive online
resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence
data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res 35, 7188–7196.
Rabus, R., Nordhaus, R., Ludwig, W. & Widdel, F. (1993). Complete
oxidation of toluene under strictly anoxic conditions by a new sulfatereducing bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol 59, 1444–1451.
Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2003). MrBayes 3: Bayesian
phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19, 1572–
1574.
Sass, H. & Cypionka, H. (2004). Isolation of sulfate-reducing bacteria
from the terrestrial deep subsurface and description of Desulfovibrio
cavernae sp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 27, 541–548.
Swofford, D. L. (2003).
PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony
(and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer
Associates.
Wagner, M., Loy, A., Klein, M., Lee, N., Ramsing, N. B., Stahl, D. A. &
Friedrich, M. W. (2005). Functional marker genes for identification of
Kuever, J., Könneke, M., Galushko, A. & Drzyzga, O. (2001).
sulfate-reducing prokaryotes. Methods Enzymol 397, 469–489.
Reclassification of Desulfobacterium phenolicum as Desulfobacula
phenolica comb. nov. and description of strain SaxT as
Desulfotignum balticum gen. nov., sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol
51, 171–177.
Widdel, F. & Bak, F. (1992). Gram-negative mesophilic sulfate-
http://ijs.sgmjournals.org
reducing bacteria. In The Prokaryotes, 2nd edn, pp. 3352–3378. Edited
by A. Balows, H. G. Trüper, M. Dworkin, W. Harder & K. H.
Schleifer. New York: Springer.
1065