WEAVING, VEILING,AND DRESSING
Textiles and their Metaphors in the Late Middle Ages
Edited by
Kathryn M. Rudy and Barbara Baert
BKEPOLS
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Weaving, veiling, and dressing : textiles and their metaphors in the late Middl-e Ages.
- (Medieval church studies ; 12)
1. Textile fabrics - Religious aspects 2. Textile fabrics - Europe- History 3. Christian
an andsymbolism - M&dieval, 500-1500
I. Rudy, Kathryn M. II. Baert, Barbara 246.2
ISBN-13: 9782503515274
© zoo7> Brepols Publishers n.v., Turnhout, Belgium
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means,
electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise,
without the prior permission of the publisher.
D/2007/0095/i
ISBN: 978-2-503-51527-4
Printed in the E. U. on acid-free paper
CONTENTS
List of Figures
Vll
List of Plates
XIX
Introduction: Miraculous Textiles in Exempla and Images
.
from the Low Countries
KATHRYN M. RUDY
Part One: Weaving
Weaving
39
BARBARA BAERT
Weaving Mary s Chaplet: The Representation of the Rosary
in Late Medieval Flemish Manuscript Illumination
4i
ANNE MARGREET W. AS-VIJVERS
Praying, Threading, and Adorning: Sewn-in Prints in a
Rosary Prayer Book (London, British Library, Add. MS 14042)
8i
HANNEKE VAN ASPEREN
The Representation and Meaning ofLuxurious Textiles in
Franco-Flemish Manuscript Illumination
MARGARET L. GOEHRING
121
Part Two: Veiling
Veiling
^9
BARBARA BAERT
Raising the Curtain on the Use ofTextiles in Manuscripts
i6i
CHRISTINESCIACCA
Curtains, Revelatio, and Pictorial Reality in Late Medieval
i9i
Renaissance Italy
VICTORM. SCHMIDT
Mantle, Fur, Pallium: Veiling and Unveiling in the
Martyrdom ofAgnes of Rome
21$
BARBARA BAERT
Part Three: Dressing
Dressing
241
BARBARA BAERT
The Clothing ofPoverty and Sanctity in Legends, and
245
their Representations in Trecento and Quattrocento Italy
PHILINEHELAS
Clothing, Exposure, and the Depiction ofSin in Passion
289
Iconography
MARTHA BAYLESS
.^
Swaddled or Shrouded? The Interpretation of 'Chrysom'
Effigies on Late Medieval Tomb Monuments
307
SOPHIE OOSTERWIJK
List of Contributors
349
Index
353
PRAYING, THREADING, AND ADORNING:
SEWN-IN PRINTS IN A ROSARY PRAYER BOOK
(LONDON, BRITISH LIBRARY, ADD. MS 14042)
Hanneke van Asperen
^^he medieval votary most often prayed with the help of a written text.
Manuscript prayer books provided the devotee with instructions for
devotion. Most of these books contain ample instructions on how to
pray, when, and where (often in the form of rubrics), as well as what to pray,
that is, the prayer texts themselves. In this article, I would like to single out a
manuscript that was such an aid for personal devotion:
a
small sixteenth-century
prayer bookin the British Libraryin London (Additional MS 14042)/ Thesewn-
London, British Library, Add. MS 14042: paper, 140 x loo mm, 407 + I ff. Literature on
the manuscript includes: KareJ De Flou and Edward Gailliard, Beschrijving van
M. iddelnederla. ndsche en andere Handschriften die in Engeland bewaard warden (Ghenr: Siffer,
1895-96), pp. 229-33, no. 42; Albert Ampe, 'Kritisch onderzoek van enkele aan Ruusbroec
toegeschreven teksten', in Dr. L. Reypens-Album, ed. by Albert Ampe (Anrwerp; RuusbroecGenootschap, 1964), pp. 1-36 (pp. 15-16); Mieke L. de Kreek, 'Geprent te Marienwater.
Onderzoek naar - en voorlopige inventarisatie van - mogelijke Marienwater-prentjes', in
Birgitta van Ziveden i^o3-1373. 600 jaar kunst en cultuur van haar kloosterorde, cd. by Lean C.
B. M. van Liebergen (Uden: Museum voor Religieuze Kunst, 1986), pp. 17-30; Ulla Sander
Olsen, 'Handschriften uit het Birgittinessenklooster Marienwarer te Rosmalen bij 'sHertogenbosch, in Serta Devota, cd. by Werner Verbeke and others (Leuven: Leuven
University Press, 1995), pp. 225-54 (p. 232); Karl Stooker and Theo Verbeij, Collecties op Orde,
Miscellanea Neerlandica XV-XVI, 2 vols (Leuven: Peeters, 1997), II, p. .358, no. 1068; Ursula
Early Engr avers and their Public: The Master ofthe Berlin Passion and Manuscript s from
Convents in the Rhine-Maas Region (London : Harvey Miller, 2004), p. 178, and the Online
Weekes,
Manuscripts Catalogue ofthe British Library. At this point, I would like to thankKathryn Rudy
for bringing this manuscript to my attention and for giving me a chance to present an essay
82
Hanneke van Asperen
in prints are the most striking aspect ofthis manuscript. Focusing on this prayer
book, I examine the role of images in worship, and the relationship between
prayer, image, and thread.
The London prayer book contains many ro&ary prayers. The rosary in its
most basic form is a repetition of the Ave Maria, usually followed by a Pater
Noster at even intervals. While there were several main rosaty traditions in the
lateMiddleAges, manyother 'rosaries' blossomed, whichencompassed different
aspects ofMary's life and character, aswell as those of Christ and the saints. The
compiler of the London prayer book brought several versions of the rosary
together and provided them with illustrations. Except for a few coloured
drawings and a miniature, the illustrations are single-leaf woodcuts and
engravings. A fewofthesewoodcuts bearxylographic text (that is, letters printed
from the wood block) that either provides a short prayer or names the convent
from which the picture derived: Marienwater. Most of the images are glued to
the background; others are sewn in with needle and bright silk thread. Stitches
surround the prints on all four sides ofthe page. In this way, the compiler added
a layer ofborder decoration. Like precious stones in the frame ofa painting, the
silk threads animate the periphery around the image. The stitches add colour to
the mass-produced images/
Although the use ofneedle and thread to attach objects (for example, prints,
miniatures, silk pieces of cloth for the protection of the miniatures, Veronicas,
or pilgrims' badges) to books was not uncommon in .the fifteenth and the
beginning of the sixteenth century, the highly visible red and green silk floss in
the British Library codex begs some questions regarding function and metaphor,
attachment anddecoration. Rarelyisthemethod ofattachment transformed into
a decorative element; instead, stitches usually remain silent andhardlyvisible. In
this respect, the London prayer book stands out.
In this article, I first examine the genesis of the London manuscript and the
choice of images in order to contextualize the sewn-in prints. Then I consider
the meaning of objects stitched into books, both functionally and
on the subject in this setting. Moreover, I would like to express my gratitude for iier valuable
comments and meticulo us editing. I would also like to thank Anne Margreet As-Vijvers,
Ursula Weekes, and Jos Koldeweij for their useful suggestions.
Jan Van der Stock analyses the inexpensive prices of printed images in Printing Images in
Antwerp: The Introduction ofPrintmakingin a City: Fifteenth Century to 1585 (Rotterdam: Sound
and Vision Interactive, 1998), pp. 113-24. At the time the Marienwater images were printed,
however, they were still fairly expensive.
PRAYING, THREADING, AND ADORNING
83
metaphorically. The use of thread to attach objects refers to the practice of
praying, especially in convents where textile work was an important part ofthe
daily practice. In the case of the London prayer book, this was a convent of
Tertiaries, whichmaybeidentifiedastlie convent ofMarienburgorBarbaradal
in s-Hertogenbosch. Finally, I submit that the stitched borders elaborate on the
underlying concept of the rosary prayer book, making them essential to the
understanding ofthe London codex.
The Production of the London Prayer Book
The rosary prayer book provides some clues about the time and place of its
creation. On several occasions, the text attributes indulgences to Pope Leo X
(1^13-21), providing a terminus post quem for the book's production. 3 The book
was written entirely in Middle Dutch with female pronouns indicating the
genderofthereader.Nounsincludetermssuchasdochter('daughter'), dieneresse
('female servant'), and sondaresse ('female sinner') when referring to the person
who recites the prayers. The pronouns suggest that the scribe was a nun who
wrote for her'own use or that of her sisters. 4 Furthermore, introductions to
prayers relate stories of nuns and young women, and images ofpraying nuns
populate the prints. After its production, the book remained within the walls of
a convent, as indicated by a smeenth-century owner's inscription on the
flyleaves, 'sister Geertruijt van Oosterwijck'.5
The identity of the scribe remains a mystery. She is usually identified as a
resident of the Birgittine convent of Marienwater in Rosmalen (near 's-
Hertogenbosch), because several ofthewoodcut prints sewn andpasted into the
Londonprayerbookapparentlycamefrom thatconvent, asxylographictextson
the prints indicate (seeAppendix). 6 However, the prints thatMarienwater either
Add. MS 14042, fols 156", i57", 187', and 261'.
4 The book with the biographies of the sisters from the convent of Saint Agnes in
Emmerich relates a story about a woman who used to write 'wreaths of Our Dear Lady' for
the othersisters. See Schwesternbuch und Statuten des StAgnes-Konvents in Emmerich, cd. by
Anne Bollmann andNikolaus Staubadi (Emmerich: Emmericher Geschichtsverein, 1998),p.
170.
5 Add. MS 14042, fol. 3": 'Suster Geertruyt van Oosterwyck'.
For the identification asBirgktine, see De Kreek, 'Geprent te Mariemuater; p. 2$; Olsen,
Handschriften', p, 232; Stooker andVerbeij, Collecties op Orde, II, p. 358, andWeekes, Early
Engravers, p. 178. The print with the inscription Maria water in the London prayer book has
84
Hanneke van Asferen
produced or commissioned, whichcomprise but a fraction ofthe imagesin the
book, probably circulated both inside andoutside the convent ofRosmalen. The
nuns probably sold them or gave them awayto visitors and sisters from other
convents. 7 The images, dateable to around i500, 8 circulated for quite some time
before they were integrated in the rosary prayer book that waswritten after the
accession of Pope Leo X.
Was the compiler ofthe London prayer book a Birgittine? In my view, there
are good indications that the book was not written or used in a Birgitune
convent. While there is a pasted-in drawingdepicting St Bridget ofSweden, St
Barbara, and StAmalberga with the sturgeon at her feet (fol. 383^, the extensive
rosary accompanying it is dedicated to Barbara, not to Bridget. Another
indication is theMarienwater woodcut depicting the Holy Family, which
includes a kneeling nun (Plate 4). In a closely relatedversion ofthis single-leaf
print (Amsterdam, Rijksmuseum, inv. no. RP-P-I955-328; Plate 5), the nun
kneelingatthebottom ofthescenewearsthegarboftheBirgittine order, which
includes a white crown marked by the five red wounds of Christ. In the copy in
the London prayer book, on the other hand, the distinctive headgear has been
heavily painted over in order to obscure the typical characteristics of the
Birgittine order.WhiletheBirgittineswereresponsibleforprintingmanysingleleafdevotional woodcuts in theNetherlands around1500, manypeople collected
them over a long period oftime. The imagescould havechangedhandsseveral
times before they were inserted in the prayer book. After all, early prints were
circulated, used, and re-used. The images, while not made exclusively for the
even been described as an ex-libris: De Kreek, 'Geprent te Marienwater, p. 25. This seems
erroneous, however. The xylographic text may state the origin of the prints, but certainly not
that of the book. The print of the Virgin in Sole serves primarily . as an illumination of the
psalter that follows directly afterwards, and not so much as an ex-libris that stands apart from
the contents of the book.
7 The carved blocks from which the prints were pulled probably comprised changeable
components (main scene, margins, and text), which could be combined or altered depending
on the wishes of the printer or commissioner. For more information on Marienwater as a
centre of printmaking, see Maurits De I\4eyer,. Volksprenten in de Nederlanden 1400-1900
(Amsterdam: Scheltema and Holkema; Anrwerp: Standaard Wetenschappelijke Uitgeverij,
1970)1 P- 13; Adolf Spamer, Das kleine Andachtsb'ild vom XIV. bis zum. XX. Jahrhzi. ndert
(Munich: Bruckmann, 1930), p. 33,and In Buscoducis 1450-162?. KunstuitdeBourgondische tijd
te 's-Hertogenbosch,. cd. by Jos Koldeweij (Maarssen: Gary Schwarz-SDU, 1990), p. 159.
For the dating ofthese prints-to around 1500, see In Buscoducis, cd. by Koldeweij, p. 159,
and De Kreek, 'Geprent te Marienwater , p. 18.
PRAYING,THREADING,ANDADORNING
8?
nuns of Marienwater, could however, point to the region of origin of the
London prayer book.
Ratherthana Birgittine, thecompilerwasprobablya Tertiary, thatis,a sister
who followed the rule of the Third Order of St Francis, presumably from a
convent in s-Hertogenbosch. Clues supporting this hypothesis appear in several
of the book's rubrics. For example, Francis, who has two prayers in the
manuscript instead of only one, is called 'our holy humble father'. 9 Another
prayerhasa rubricexplainingthat'ChristfaughtthefollowingTwenty-fivePater
Nosters, a common prayer, 'to a nun from the grey order', in other words, to a
Tertiary. 10 Elsewhere, the text mentions a certain father Sigilbertus who,
according to the text, was 'the honourable father and general of the entire
Tertiary order'. " After the intercession ofthis clergyman, Leo X granted 1, 200
years of indulgence to the accompanying prayer. Father Sigilbertus can be
identified as Gilbertus Nicolai (d. 1532), who was commissioner general ofthe
ThirdOrderduringthepapacyofLeoX.Afterhisappointment asvicargeneral
{vicarius genemlis) of the Third Order to the north of the Alps in 1511-14 and
1516-17, Gilbertus becameminister general {commissariusgeneralis) oftheentire
order in1517. " He wasre-elected for another three years in 1520. This means that
the prayer book must have been written between 1517 and 1^23, or shortly
thereafter. Moreover, therubric intheLondonprayerbookmentions brieflythat
fatherSigllbertuswascalledAveMaria. In1517,LeoX actuallyallowedGilbertus
Nicolaito change hisname to Gabriel deAve Maria, orAve Maria, to accentuate
his devotion to the Virgin Mary. 13
Mary and Barbara, who receive particular attention in the London prayer
book, werethe combined patron saints oftwo different convents ofTertiaries in
9 Add. MS 14042, fol. 398": 'Hier be/ ghint een/ seer deuoet / schoon ghe/ betVaa / den
gloria / sen weerdi/ ghen teeken / dragherxpisti I onsen heili / ghen oetmoe / dighenvader/
Francisco'.
Add. MS 14042, fol. 256'': 'Dese nauolgenrir<? xxv. yater nostei leerde onse here / Ihesus
eend^r nonnen vander grouwen orden'.
.
Add. MS . 14042, fols i87I -v: 'Ende dits
geschiet
/
ter
beden des
eerwerdigen
vaders /
Generaelder heelder minderbrue / ders orden Pater Sigilbertus diemen / naemde Aue Maria'.
P. Peano, 'Gabriel-Maria Nicolas', m Dictionnaire d'Histoire et de Geographic
Ecclesiastiques, ed. byAlfred Baudrillart and others, currently 29 vols (Paris:LetouzeyetAne,
i5)i2-), XIX, cols 572-76, and HeiibenHoiza. pfe[, Manuale Historiae Ordinis FratrumMinorum
(Freiburg: Herder, i909), pp. 625-26.
13 Peano, 'Gabriel-Maria Nicolas', col. 574.
86
Hanneke van Asperen
's-Hertogenbosch and its environs. The first was B.arbaradal op den Eikendonk,
which was founded in 1475. 14There are several indications ofliterary production
there. 15Moreover, the convent was situated near Marienwater, where the prints
originated. The other Tertiary community dedicated to Mary and Barbarawas
Marienburg op den Uilenborg. The former beguines accepted the rule of St
Francisin 1469. 16A production ofprayerbooksfornuns' ownuseatMarienburg
is demonstrable in the late sixteenth centmy. 17 The intended reader of the
manuscript could have been
a
sister
from either
convent.
The name of sister Geertruijt van Oosterwijck, written on one of the blank
pages of the London prayer book
(fol. 3V ),
re-appears in
a
manuscript from
Marienburg. 18The bookfrom Marienburg (Tilburg, University Library, KHS 6)
is a Liber Obituum, a calendar with the names -of the sisters who had died and
were to be commemorated on specific days during the liturgical year. According
to a later addition in the obituary book, 'susier Gertmijt van Oistenvijck' died
at the convent of Marienburg on the eighteenth of the 'slaughter month'
(November) in 1622. 19 She is not mentioned in a register of the sisters at
14 L. van deMeerendonk, Het Klooster op de Eikendonk U Den Dungen (Tilburg: Stichtlng
Brabants Historisch Contact, 1964), p. 15.
15Van de Meerendonk, HetKlooster, pp. $8-60; Piet Dorenbosch, 'De Dichteres van Sinte
Barbara-Dael', Brabantia Nostra, 2 (1936), 90-96, 157-64.
L. H. C. Schutjes, Geschiedenis van het Bisdom 's Hertogenbosch, 5 vols (Sint-MichielsGestel: Boekdrukkerij van hct Bisdom van 's Bosch, 1870-81), IV, p^492.
17 Jos Koldeweij, 'Lijfelijke en geestelijke pelgrimage: materiele souvenirs van spirituele
pelgrimage', in Geen Povere Schoonheid. Laat-middeleeiiwse Kunst in Verbandmet de Moderne
Devotie, ed. by Kees Veelenturf (Nijmegen: ValkhofPers, 2000>r-pp-22z-^2 (pp. 231-32); C.
J. A. van den Oord, Tzuee eeznven Bosch' Boekbedrijf 1450-1656 {'Y'A^u's:^: Stichting Zuidelijk
Historisch Contact, 1984), p. 406, no. A4.
18 Michael Schoengen, Monasticon Batavum, 3 vols (Amsterdam: Noord-HoUandsche
Uitgevers Maatschappij, 1941-42), I, p. in, and Supplement by David de Kok, pp. 82-83;
Analecta Gijsberti Coeverincx, ed. by G. van Elsen and W. Hoevenaars, 2 vols (sHertogenbosch: Provinciaal Genootschapvan Kunsten enWetenschappen in Noord-Brabant,
Lutkie en Cranenburg, .1905-07), II, pp. 347-63; Schutjes, Geschiedenis, pp. 491-99.
19Tilburg, University Library, KHS 6 (Olim: 3380), fol. 3?". Seejeroen M. M. van deYen,
Over Brabant Geschreven. Handschriften en Archivalische Bronnen in de Tilburgse
Universiteitsbibliotheek, 2 vols (Leuven: Peeters, 1994), I, pp. 51-53, and Nieuwe Catalogus der
Oorkonden en Handschriften berustende in de Boekerij van het Provinciaal G-enootschap van
Kunsten en Wetenschdppen in Noord-Brabant, suppl. by A. F. 0. van Sasse van Ysselt ( s-
Hertogenbosch: Lutkie en Cranenburg, 1915), p. 407. Ulla Sander Olsen identified Geertruijt
van Oostenvijckas a resident oftheMarienwater convent. However, Olsen could not traceher
PRAYING, THREADING, AND ADORNING
87
Marienburg from i575, which could mean that sheentered the convent after that
date. 20Perhapsthesisterwhowrotehername in the Londonprayerbookis the
same asthe sister who died at Marienburg m 1622. However, Geertruijt was a
common name, and the townofOisterwijkis close to 's-Hertogenboscli. The
possibility of there being another Geertmijt from Oisterwijk in one of the
Tertiary convents cannot be excluded.
Summarizing, the manuscript prayer book was written for the use of the
sisters of the Third Order of St Francis between 1517 and 1523, or shortly
thereafter. Theconvent wassituated inoraround's-Hertogenbosch, asindicated
by the presence ofthe Marienwater prints. Because ofthe accent on theVirgin
Mary and St Barbara, a provenance from Marienburg or Barbaradal, both
communities of Tertiaries in 's-Hertogenbosch, seems most likely. The two
convents took Mary and Barbara as their patron saints and produced
manuscripts. The identity of the scribe remains obscure. She could have been a
Birgitdne of Marienwater, writing for the use of a Tertiary sister of a nearby
convent. Considering the prints (obscured Marienwater prints supplemented
with many additional engravings), and the order-specific content ofthe prayer
book, the most obvious conclusion seemsto bea production atMarienburg or
Barbaradal.
The Contents andthe Decorative Programme
The London manuscript was intended for individual use, as indicated by its
small size, aswell as the subjects and rubrics ofthe prayer texts. The pages are
filledwith differentkinds ofprayers, mainlyrosaries, a devotional exercisewhich
was widespread during the late Middle Ages (see Appendix). " The main
in the obituary book ofMarienwater: Olsen, 'Handschriften', p. 248.
Schutjes, Geschiedenis, pp. 494-95. A sister named Geertruijt Cornelis appears in the list
ofnames, but it is not clearwhether she can be identified as Geertruijt van Oostenvijck.
Fora briefhistoryoftherosarydevotion, seethe article ofAnne.MargreetW.As-Vijvers
in this volume, aswell as Der Rosenkranz. Andacht, Geschichte, Kiinst, ed. by Urs-Beat Frei and
FredyBuhler(Bern: Benteli, zoo^; Anne'Winston-AUen, Stonesofthej^ose:TheMakingofthe
RosaryintheMiddleAges,(University Park,PA:PennsylvaniaStateUniversityPress,1997,repr.
I998), pp. 13-30, and Sixten Ringbom, 'Maria in Sole and the Virgin of the Rosary, Journal
of the Warbiirg and Courtauld Institutes, 25 (1962), 32. 6-30, and the literature cited there.
Becausetheoriginsoftherosaryprayeraredealtwith fully elsewhere in thisvolume, I will only
tackle the subject briefly.
Hanneke van Asperen
88
characteristic of the rosary is the reiteration of prayer, an ancient form of
devotion. From early Christian times onwards, the Pater Noster was used to
create a repetitive prayer sequence of variable length. With the growing
popularity oftheVirgin the Pater Noster wasreplaced with the angelic salutation
Ave Maria, which became the backbone of the rosary prayer. The number of
Aves varied from five to several hundred. The devotee could keep track of the
number ofrecitations by using a knotted cord or a string of beads, which was
also called a rosary or paternoster. 22
Even though the rosar^ began to take its definite shape during the late
Middle Ages, different forms of the rosary prayer existed side by side, as
illustrated
by the
London prayer book. The first
rosa.
ry prayer in the
manuscript
is a Psalter ofOur Lady, to be read throughout the year (fols 5r-6ir). z3This form
oftherosary, consisting of150Avesin total, referred to the150psalms, andhence
was called a psalter. For the sake ofsimplification, the texts ofthe psalms were
replaced by the text of the Pater Noster or the Ave Maria. Presumably, in the
fourteenth century, thepsaltergraduallycrystallized byfocusingontherecitation
of 150 Aves interspersed with fifteen Pater Nosters. ^ Invocations, praises, and
pleas were addedin order to vary the devodonal fare and construct an intricate
spiritual exercise to contemplate the life of the Virgin. This form of the psalter
ofthree groups offifty Aveswith the accompanying contem. pladons most closely
resembles the present-day rosary.
The next sequence in the London prayer book, consisting ofnine groups of
fifty Aves, describes the events ofMary's life from the Immaculate Conception
to theAssumption (fols 62r-i22r). After this follow several other prayers to JVIary,
including rosary cycles concentrating on the Virgin's Sorrows and her Joys, all
to be read at different moments ofthe day, week, or year. The latter part ofthe
London prayer book (also comprising rosaries) focuses on Christ, the Eucharist,
22 On prayer strings and beads, see Ronald W. Lightbown, Mediaeval European Jewellery
(London: Victoria and Albert Museum, 1992), pp. 342-54; Manfred Brauneck, Religiose
Volkskunst. Votivgaben, Andachtsbilder, Hmterglas, Rosenkranz, Amulette (Cologne: DuMont,
1979)) PP- 238-62; ^oo Jahre Rosenkranz, 1475 Koln ly/f: Kunst tind Fromm igkeit im
Spdtmittelalter undihrWeiterleben [exhibition catalogue] (Cologne: Bachem, 1975),andGislind
Ritz, 'Der Rosenkranz. Formen and Funktionen', in Bayerisches Jahrbzichfur Volkskunde 1^6.0
(Regensburg: Habbel, 1960), pp. 51-101 (pp. 57-69).
z3 Add. MS 14042, fol. 7r: 'Hier begint den paradijsscen souter der / glorioser hemelscer
coninginnen en<a/f? moedi?r / gods
m ana .
24 This invention is usually attributed to Heinrich von Kalkar (1328-1408), but may be
substantially older: 500 Jahre Rosenkranz, p. 55.
PRAYING,THREADING,ANDADORNING
89
and saints, including Peter, Catherine, Barbara, Anne, and Francis. 25 Even
though the saints occupy an important part of the manuscript, the London
codexismainlya prayerbookforMariandevotion thatprovides thereaderwith
a rosary for every possible Marian occasion.
The sewn-in prints appearin the first part ofthe book, within tlie rosaries of
the life ofMaty. Sixout ofthe eight prints that illustrate the joyful events still
have a stitched border. 26 Two of the sewn-in pictures were taken out and
replaced. Thestitcheswereremovedin theprocess. Oneofthesubstituteprints
depicts the Virgin in the Rosary to precede the Psalter ofOur Lady (Figure 27).
In the centre oftheengraving is animage ofthe Virgin in Sole (asthe print with
the prologue). 27 Mary, holding Jesus in her arms, is depicted in the Sun and
wears the crown oftwelve stars. This vision ofthe apocalyptic woman is taken
from the Apocalypse (12. i). Here, the image is combined with different
references to the rose, and Mary is enthroned in the rose's heart. This is the
flowering vine that grew until it reached the highest heaven, and represents
Marys bodily Assumption. An inscription runs along the edge ofthe print in
which Mary, 'the heavenly flower and flowering rose', is hailed as Our Lady of
perpetual help to sinners. 28A scroll with a text from Ecclesiasticus (24. 18) runs
along the stalk ofthe flower: 'Egoquasipla^tatio rose in Iherico' ('I [was exalted]
asa roseplant inJericho'). 29In the rosarystringframing theimageofMary, the
small red beads represent the Aveprayers, while roses represent the PaterNosters.
Theseredrosesconnote thewounds ofChrist. 30Thereissomespaceleftbetween
25 In the late Middle Ages, the rosary prayer was associated with the veneration of saints
as well. See 500Jahre Rosenkranz, pp. 84-85.
Six of the prints are sewn-in and not five, as Ursula Weekes states: Weekes, Early
Engravers, p. 178.
7 The image ofthe Virgin in Soledeveloped into the Virgin in the Rosary, both ofthem
connected with large indulgences. Seethe contribution ofAnne Margreet W.As-Vijvers in this
volume, and Ringbom, 'Maria in Sole, p. 329.
The text reads: '0 hemelsche bloeme een bloeende / rose in iherico gheplant deserwerelt
wijt / met recht wij u noemewant godt / u vercose dei sonderen [sic: den sondaren] bistant te
wesenaltijt'. Theword 'bloeend' meansboth 'Qowery'and 'bleeding', pointing to thePassion
of Christ and the Sorrows of Mary.
19 The deuterocanonical book of the Bible, Ecclesias-ticus, not to be confounded with
Ecclesiastes, is also known as the Wisdom ofJesus Son ofSirach, or simply Sirach..
3 On fol. 17', the wounds of Christ are actually called the 'die gebloem / de wonder', or
'the flowery wounds'. Seealso ReindertL. Falkenburg, The Frait ofDevotion: Mysticism and
the Imagery of Love in Flemish Paintings ofthe Virgin and Child, 1450-1^0, trans. by Sammy
Hanneke van Asperen
90
the beads, so that theycan beshifted across the string asifthe rosary is in actual
use.
<f<
i%?~-?-"^. ^\.
<v yy* rf ^ 1'-* -«'
SSS
^^\y .,,.^
jci'J^j^C^M^ *^
.
w?%-<
s^^.,>^'S^^-*
^,'^x=
^
^^^
m,i.--^y
.
'''*.. '»'
-.
-. -^
.>.»
ft'
Figure 27. The Virgin in the Rosary, hand-coloured engraving pasted onto page
of a prayer book, London, British Library, Add. MS 14042, fol. 6".
Monogrammist LPX?, six.teenth century.
Herman (Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1994), pp. 39-40
PRAYING,THREADING,ANDADORNING
9i
The print focuses thevotar/s attention whileshe recites the Psalrer ofOur
Lady,whichisdividedinto threeparts. Everypart- nameda psalterinitself
consistsoffiftyAves,asstatedbefore.TherosarystringthatframesMaryin
theprintcomprisesexactlythesamenumber:fiftysmallbeadsrepresentingthe
Aves and a rose after each ten to represent the Paters. God the Father and the
HolySpiritarerepresentedintheuppercornersoftheprint.Togetherwiththe
Christ child, depicted atthecentre, theycomplete theTrinity, citedin thefirst
lines ofthe Psalter: 'Joyofjoys and delight ofdelights areyou, 0 honourable
MotherofGod inthemiddleoftheTrinity'. 31Theimagetreatsthetextliterally
byplacingtheVirginatthecentreoftheTrinity. Astheperforationsvisiblefrom
thefolio'srectoindicate,theimageofMary intheRosaryreplacesonethatwas
previously sewnin, but subsequently removed. Perhapsthe newonefitted the
textbetter.Alternatively, theformerprintmighthavegrownshabbythroughuse
or become damaged by accident, and the user felt the need to replace it.
Whateverthereason, thestitcheswereremoved in theprocess.
The next print in the London prayer book shows what the border of the
rosaryengravingmusthavelookedlikewhenthestitcheswerestillinplace.The
imageoftheHolyFamilyisfirmlyfixedtothepagewitha seriesofalternating
red and green cross stitches (Plate 4). The print introduces the entire set of
rosariesofthefeastsofMary.Theprologuereads:'Herebeginsa purearbourof
rosesandallkindsofflowersofthelife,theloveandthevirtuesoftheHeavenly
Queen Mary5.
32
Mary appears together
with Anne, Joachim, and Christ in the
foregroundofa gardenconfinedbya lowbrickwall.' Thisistheenclosedgarden
{hortzisconchsus).Theimageoftheenclosedgarden,derivedfromtheCanricles
(4.12),isoftencitedtoexpressMary'svirginity. 33Therefore,theimagefitsthe
mainthemeofthefirstrosary. It addressestheImmaculate Conceptionofthe
Virgin SheistheunspoiledgardenthatbroughtforththeroseofChrist.Mary
herselfisa 'beautifulrose'aswell, produced bytheblackearthwithoutbeing
Add. MS 14042, fol. 7r: 'Bliscap der blisca / ppen ends vroude / dervrouden si I v 0
eerwerdige / moeder gods int I middel der .h. / drieuoldicheit\
Add.MS14042 fol 67.':'Hierbeginteensuuerlicprieel/ vwroosenendememgerley
bloemen / desleuensdeslifdensendeduechdender/ hemelscerconmgwnemarh'.
On thesubject ofthe Holy Family andthe enclosed garden, seeHildegard Erlemann,
Die Heilzge Familie. Ein Tugendvorbild der Gegenreformation im Wandel der Zeit, Kult und
Ideologie(Munster: Ardey,1993),pp. ^0-56. HildegardErlemann depictsa verysimilarprint,
withJosephshakingthefruit downoffthetreeinsteadofJoachIm. Anne isnotpresentin this
muchyoungerversion oftheimage:Erlemann, DieHeiligeFamilie,fig.9.
HannekevanAsperen
92
soiled byit' .34The text oftheprayerpraises thevirginity ofbothAnne andMary,
symbolized bythe imageofthe enclosedgardenandaccentuatedbytheirplace
under the canopy.
The other elements in the print correspond closely to the contents of the
rosary aswell, for example the tree in the background. It symbolizes the fertility
ofMary and her mother. Mary is the 'blessed fruit' ofAnne's body, as Christ is
that ofMar^. 35In a broader sense, the blossoming tree is evidence ofAnnes
devoutness. After all, she was endowed with a child because ofher piety. The text
relates that Anne 'was twenty years without the blessing offertility, but she
served God ardently. At every feast, she went to the temple to make her
offerings'. 36Mary, the fruit ofprayer, was created because ofAnne's devotions.
The rosaries in the London prayer book give the devotee an opportunity to
follow the virtuous example ofAnne, because by reading the rosar^ prayers, the
devotee offers 'roses', which are both flowers and prayers. In combination with
the text of the prayers, the red blossoms ofthe tree can be identified as roses.
Some of the fallen flowers lie at the feet of the praying nun (once a Birgittine)
in the lower right comer. She is the devout soul. 37Like Mary andAnne, she is
depictedwithin the confines ofthe enclosedgarden, possibly a reference to the
34Add. MS 14042, fol. 66': 'Ghelijc die schoone roose voort / coemt wtter swarter eerden
Onbesmet / vander eerdeyz Alsoe sijt ghi 0 marh in v / ontfanckenis bewaertt sonder smette
dcrerfsondera/Aue/En gelijcdierooseond^rdie / dornenAlsoe sidi0 mari-dgodsvriendinne
/ onder die dochteren / Vatef n. oster maria / 0 Maria moeder ende maget gebcndijt si v aldcr
heilicste oratfanckenis / ende gebmdijt moet sijn die vruchtbarhek uwer I §moeder / Aue
mana. .
" On thesubject ofAnne, seeTon Brandenbarg, 'SaintAnne:A Holy Grandmother and
Her Children', in Sanctity and Motherhood, ed. by Anneke B. Mulder-Bakker (New York:
Garland, 1995), pp. 31-65; Heilige Anna, Grote M. oeder. De Cultus van de Heilige MoederAnna
en haar Familie in de Nederlanden en Aangrenzende Streken, ed. by Ton Brandenbarg and
others (Nijmegen: SUN, 1992); Ton Brandenbarg, Heilig Familieleven. Verspreid. ing en
Waardering van de Historie van Sint-Anna in de Stedelijke Cultuur in de Nederlanden en het
RijnlandaanhetBeginvan deModerne 7y'^(Nijmegen: SUN,1990),andInterpretingCultural
Symbols: Saint Anne in Late Medieval Society, ed. by Kathleen Ashley and Pamela Sheingorn
(Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1991).
36Add. MS 14042, fol. 63': 'Siwan xxjaren sonder bmdictie / dervruchtbarhri?. nochtans
godveirich/ liedienen^En^egingentotalienhoochtij / denindentempelowhaerofferhande
te doen .
37
Falkenburg, The Fruit of Devotion, pp. 43-44-
PRAYING,THREADING,ANDADORNING
93
private community ofthe convent or to the garden ofher soul. 38The flowers in
front ofthe nun are tlie results ofherprayers; they are her offerings. Her piety
reflects that ofAnne.
From the examples mentioned above, it becomes clear that the compiler
carefullyselected theillustrations toenhancethetext'sdevotional message. 39Like
a miniature cycle, they illustrate and amplify the text, but unlike the usual
miniature cycles, that is, those accompanying a book of hours, they do not
systematicallyprovideillustrations ofnarrativemoments; rather, theyaresingleleaf devotional images to be used in combination with the prayer texts.
Sometimes, the combination with the text or other images even adds new
meaning to the pictures. The result is a unique book ofprayers with a strong
personal bias.
The personal slant of the London prayer book also manifests itself in the
stitches.Thecomposer combinedtextualandtextural techniques. Thisaddsan
entirely new element to the manuscript. Before examining the role of the
stitches, it isimportant to considerwhenandwhythestitcheswereapplied. Not
all theprints were attached with needle and thread, only the ones that still have
a blankframe. Whenthisblankframewascutoff(andtheedgeoftheimagewas
the edge ofthe print), stitches would have interfered with the image. In these
cases,thecompilerpastedtheprint to thepaper. Thereasonwhysomepictures
havea stitched border andothers do not seems to haveoriginated out ofsheer
necessity. It hasto dowith the state oftheprint atthe time the compiler decided
to usethe imagefor the prayer book. This doesnot mean the threadisjust an
alternate wayofattachment. Whenever shecould, the composer ofthe London
prayerbookusedstitches. In doingso, sheaddedto themeaningoftheprints.
The sister added a layer of recept ion that
gives useful information
on
the way the
3 Hooglied. De beeldwereldvan religieiize vrouwen in de Zuidelijke Nederlanden, vanafde
dertiende eeuw, ed. by Paul Vandenbroeck and others (Brussels: Vereniging voor
Tentoonstellingen Paleisvoor SchoneKunsten, 1994), pp. 91-99, andFalkenburg, The Fruit
of Devotion, esp. pp. 2. 2-37.
Forthesame reasons, miniatures and drawings could beadded to books. On thesubject
ofsingle-leafprints (andother single-leafpictures) inmanuscripts, seePeterSchmidt, The Use
ofPrintsin German Convents oftheFifteenth Century: TheExample ofNuremberg , Studies
in Iconography, 24 (2003), 43-69 (pp. 47-48), and Peter Schmidt, Gedruckte Bilder in
handgescbriebenen Buchern. Zum Gebrauch van Druckgraphik im 15. Jahrhundert (Cologne:
Bohlau, 2003). In the Rhine-Maas region, nuns regularly added engravings to manuscripts.
The earlyprints were in factproduced with the intention to incorporate them into devotional
books, see"Weekes, Early Engraven, pp. 81-97.
Hanneke van Asperen
94
prints were used and understood in a period that was highly influenced by
religious reforms.
The Thread of Prayer
The stitches have several functions. First, they add relief to the page, and
therefore could serve as bookmarks. The stitched borders mark the folios of the
prayers that had to be recovered quickly. Like the knotted strips or tabs of
parchment attached to the fore-edge ofthe book, they make it easy for the user
to find the inception pages, or incipks. Furthermore, the stitched borders serve
asa simple kind ofborder decoration, because they add colour andanimate the
periphery of the page and, like marginal illuminations, they organise the text.
They enhance
the coherence of the manuscript book by constructing
a recurrent
motif throughout the codex. The stitched borders literally tie the prayers
together. Although the individual rosaries treat different events, they form a
closely-knit unit. As the thread ofa story, the sewing threads give the manuscript
its coherence.
Significantly, the words text-textile are etymologically related. 40 The Latin
textus, the perfect participle ofthe infmidve texere, means 'something woven or
platted'. Texts, which derivefrom textiles, arewoven metaphorically from words,
and likewise, a storyteller must weave a y^rn carefully or else the narrative will
fail to hang together well. A text is a compilation ofwords, woven together to
create a tight structure. The words are the composing threads that ensure the
coherence ofthe text, and their meaning and appearance determine what the text
will look like.
The notion of text as fabric -
or text transformed into fabric -
was
widespread, as fourteenth- and fifteenth-centiuy sources demonstrate. In a
miracle story, Mary appears to the faithful worshipper dressed in a beautiful
mantle ofgolden Aveprayers. 41Apparently, thewordsofthesalutation create che
fabric that dresses Mary. A coloured drawing in a late fifteenth-cenmry gospel
book, in another example, shows that text and fabric are closely related (The
40 Eithne Wilkins emphasizes the relationship between text and textile in The Rose-Garden
Game: The Symbolic Background to the European Prayer-Beads (London: Golkncz, 1969), p.
207.
41 Cornelis G. N. de 'Voojs, Middelnederlandse Marialegenden, 2 vols (Leiden: Brill, 1903),
I, pp. 118-23; see also: pp. 220-23, pp. 227-29, and the articles by Rudy andAs-Vijvers in this
volume.
PRAYING,THREADING,ANDADORNING
95
Hague,KoninklijkeBibliotheek,75E 9;Figure28). 42Thedrawing,depictingthe
Five Wounds and the ^4w2^ Christi, was inserted as an opening page at the
beginning ofthe manuscript. The Christ child sits in the centre ofthe page in
. <%^ <m
K. '?:-s-^?^^^^as?w~'::'
'
~TO^:wi
^i^Wi^
^^.^
^-''-^'
^' .
^
?-s>-^~
^^4^
WJ^. ,/<
^. t^'S^l
t.. J-46Pi . ^ 3-'^
Figure 28. Christ-child, the Arma Christi, and the names ofChrist and Mary,
hand-coloured drawing in a gospel book. The Hague, Koninklijke Bibliotheek,
MS 75 E 9, fol. iv. Utrecht, 1472.
42
The Hague, Koninklijke Bibliorheek, MS 75 E 9, fol. i"; vellum, 277 x 207 mm, 128 ff.
Ghysbert Beynop, a Canon Regular of the Windesheim congregation at the monastery
Vredendaal in Utrecht, wrote the book for his brother Aelbert in 1472, according to the rext
on fol. 127".
96
HannekevanAsperen
the wounded heart. The branches ofthe crown ofthorns arewoven through the
words Ihesus and Maria. Like warp and weft threads in a fabric, the letters and
the branches form a tight structure. Text is textile. The objects are attached to
a background of textus, in both senses of the term. The sword and the lance,
situated crosswise, pierce the letters and connect the five wounds - the side
wound in the middle and the wounds of the hands and feet in the corners
with the names ofChrist and his mother. The words and objects in tLe drawing
arefirmly tiedtogether asproportional parts in the whole. Together, theycreate
a fabric in which evety element is interconnected. Like a cloth of honour, the
letters and objects form an appropriate setting for the Christ child.
Like the depicted objects in the gospel book, actual images and objects can
be tied to a text. Often, devotional books contain traces ofpilgrims' badgesonce
stitched to theirpages, asin theD'Oiselet Hours in the Koninklijke Bibliotheek
in The Hague (77 L 60, fol. 98r). 43The method ofattachment elaborates on the
text-textile metaphor. By stitching prints and badges onto the pages of the
manuscript, the owner has threaded them through the text, making them an
integral part ofthe woven structure.
The stitches in the London codex have more extensive connotations,
especially in the context ofthe convent. The appearance ofsewn-in prints in a
prayer bookconnects the related activities ofprayer andtextilework. 44There are
43 For an illustration, see H. J. E. van Beuningen and Jos Koldeweij, Heilig en profaan,
Rotterdam Papers, 8, 2 vols (Cothen: Srichting Middeleeuwse Religieuze en Profane Ensignes,
I993-2ooi), I, pp. 46-48. The link with pilgrims' badges was noted before: Friz Oskar
Schupisser, 'Copper Engravings of the Mass Production: Illustrating Netherlandish Prayer
Manuscripts', in Masters and Miniatures: Proceedings of the Congress on Medieval Manuscript
Illzimination in the Northern Netherlands, ed. by Koert van der Horst and Johann Christian
Klamt (Doornspijk: Davaco, 1990), pp. 389-400 (p. 392), and Weekes, Early Engraven, pp.
167, 182-83.
44 In his analyses of the prints of the 'mass production', Schupisser mentions a book of
hours in Vienna with sewn-in prints: Schupisser, Copper Engravings , p. 392 (Vienna,
Osterreichische Nationalbibliothek, MS Series nova 12715). In the sixth chapter ('Sewing in
Meaning') of her book on the Master of the Berlin Passion, UrsulaWeekes elaborates on the
Vienna hours, considering the decorative quality and semiotic meaning ofthe stitches: Weekes,
Early Engravers, pp. 167-85. Sherightly points out that thestitches in theViennahours can be
connected with devout labour at convents. Regrettably, she refers almost exclusively TO German
sources in her attempt to contexrualize the manuscript from Brabanr. The intended readers of
the Vienna hours still deserve closer attention. Weekes argues that the presence of the stitches
indicates the involvement ofwomen in the production of the book, even though the book was
made for a man who was probably sensitive to the devotional meaning of the stitches. See
PRAYING,THREADING,ANDADORNING
97
manysimilarities between praying and sewing: both require repetitive actions
(either ofthe tiands, the mouth, or the thoughts) and subsequently produce a
tranquiUizmg effect. Because ofthese characteristics, manual labour could have
devout dimensions. Most suitable for women were light, monotonous activities,
which created opportunities for pious thoughts. Needlework, a daily routine in
mostnunneries from times immemorial, wasIdeal: embroidery helped nuns avert
idleness and gossip, especially when they coupled their handiwork with pious
meditations to turn labour into a devodonal exercise. 4?
Various medieval sources, especially from convents of the Devotio M. oder^,
reveal the connotations oftextile work in religious communities. For exarp^ple,
the Sisters of the Common Life at the Meester Geertshuis in Deveflter, a
foundation of Geert Grote (who also founded the Devotio Moderna], wrote
SisterBooks', biographies ofthesisterswho haddied. 46These lives chronicle the
exceptional devodonal activities of exemplary sisters. The texts reveal that,
besides praying, reading, andwriting, sisters devoted themselves to spinning and
weaving. They combined this work with devout meditations, as the earliest
manuscript Sister Book indicates. The women used to comport themselves 'in
Weekes, Early Engravers, pp. 168-69, and pp. 177-80. The text is actually interspersed with
male nouns such as knecht ('male servant') and sone ('son'); see MS Series nova 1271$, fols 74",
79\ and. 83". Sisters, however, are included, for example on fol. 121": 'Collecte / voer susteren
ende bruederen', suggesting a wide audience of men andwomen.
4?See, for example LinaEckenstein, Womenunder Monasticism: Chapters on Saint-Lore and
Convent Life between A. D. yoo andA. D. i^oo (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1896),
pp. 222-38, and Jeffrey F. Hamburger, Nuns as Artists: The Visual Culture of a Medieval
Convent (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997), p. 207.
46 On the subject ofthe Meester Geertshuis, see, for example J. De Hullu, 'De Statuten
van het Meester-Geertshuis te Deventer', mArchiefvoor Nederlandsche Kerkgeschiedenis, ed. by
J. G. R. Acquoy and H. C. Rogge, 7 vols (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1885-99), VI, pp.
63-76, and Wybren Scheepsma, Deemoeden Devotie. De Koorvrouwen van Windesheim en hun
Geschriften (Amsterdam: Prometheus, 1997), pp. 16-18, and the literature mentioned there, esp.
in n. 17. On Sister Books, see the introduction ofKathryn M. Rudyin this volume, as well as
Wybren Scheepsma, 'For hereby I hope to roase some piety: Books of Sisters from Convents and
Sister-houses associatedwith the Devotio Moderna in the Low Countries', in Women, the Book
and the Godly (Selected Proceedings ofthe St Hilda's Conference), ed by L. Smith and}. H. M.
Taylor, 2 vols (Cambridge: Brewer, 199^), I, pp. 27-40, and Ludo Jongen and 'Wybren
Scheepsma, Wachten op de Hemelse Bruidegom. De Diepenveense Nonnenviten m
Literairhistorisch Perspectief, in Boeken voor de Eeuwigheid, ed. by Th. Mertens and otliers
(Amsterdam: Prometheus, 15)93), pp. 295-317.
98
Hanneke van Asperen
the agony and the sufferings of Christ', so that they could incorporate the
spiritual in their daily activities, wherever they were. 47
The interconnectedness ofpraying and textile work emerges in the content
ofthe stories themselves. For example, sister Gertrut van Hiessel (d. 1434) wove
at her loom so devoutly that it felt as if she had attended Mass, 'where God is
present'. 48 Spinning work could also have devout dimensions, since the text of
the Sister Book interchanges the words 'spijnhuys' ('house for the spinning
work') and 'bedehuys' ('house ofprayer'). 49Thesisters evidently didnot perform
their spinning in the 'werckhuys' ('the working house', where the weaving was
done). Instead, they would gather in a room that was dedicated to prayer. The
sisters of the convent of St Agnes in Emmerich, a community of Sisters of the
Common Life who took up the Rule ofAugustine in 1463, would retreat to the
church with a spool to combine their work with prayers. 50
Because of its spiritual implications, textile work could yield indulgences.
When the bishop of 'Yslant' came to Deventer, he visited the Lamme van
Diezehuis, another community of the Sisters of the Common Life where the
residents wrote Sister Books. 51During his visit, the bishop saw the young sister
Andries Yserens (d. 1502) busily spooling her threads on reed pipes, an activity
that was especially appropriate for young girls who could not yet perform heavy
labours. 52He accosted the girl and conversed withher 'in a kind andconfidential
way', during which sister Andries probably explained the content ofthe spiritual
exercises that accompanied herspinning activities. Impressed with herdevotion,
47 Arnhem, Rijksarchief te Gelderland, MS 2435: Dirk de Man, Hier Beginnen Sommige
Sti,1C,-htige Punten van Onsen Oelden Ziisteren (The Hague: Mardnus Nijhoff, 1919), p. 64.
.
De Man, Hier Beginnen Sommige, p. 122.
49 De Man, Hier Beginnen Sommige, pp. 55, 65, 114, and 211. In Diepenveen, a convent of
the Windesheim chapter, the spinning was done in the house of prayer as well. See D. A.
Brinkerink, 'De 'Vita venerabilis loannis Brinckerinck', Nederlandsch Archief voor
Kerkgeschiedenis, n. s. i (1900), 314-54 (p. 333), and'Van den Doechden der Vurzger ende Stichtiger
Siisteren van Diepen Veen ('Handschrifr D '}, ed. by D. A. Brinkerink (Leiden: A. W. Sijthoffs
"Uitgevenj-M. aatschappij, 1904), p. 10. In the working house of the Meester Geertshuis, there
was actually a small altar with saints: De Man, Hier Beginnen Sommige, p. 71.
Schwesternbuch und Statuten, ed. by Bollmann and Staubach, pp. 174 and 230.
51 0. A. Spitzen, 'Het leven der eenvaardige moeder Andries Yserens, overste van het
Lammenhuis te Deventer, overleden in den jare 1502', Archief' voor de Geschiedenis van het
Aartsbisdom Utrecht, 2 (1875), 178-216 (pp. 193-94).
52 Young girls and elderly sisters occupied themselves with spooling: Schwesternbuch und
Statuten, cd. by Bollmann and Staubach, pp. 143, 177, and 219.
PRAYING,THREADING,ANDADORNING
99
theprelate grantedher three daysofindulgence for everypipethat sheshould
finish duringherlifetime. Undoubtedly, theindulgences werecoupledwithher
spiritual exercises, not just with the bodily work. Sister Andries apparently
developed a preference for spinning, and years later, when she had become
prioress ofthe Lamme van Diezehuis, she even abolished weaving in favour of
spinning 'for devotion's sake'. 53
Thelivesinadvertentlyrelatethecontentsofthedevotions thataccompanied
thetextile work. SisterLubbevan Swolle (that is,Zwolle, d. 1418), for example,
took responsibility for the instruction of the young sisters at the Meester
Geertshuis. ?4Shetaught them liow to do their spinningwork in a pious way.
While working, the young sisters should: 'spin the thread through thewounds
ofChrist'.Inotherwords,whilethesisterswerespinninganactualthread,they
also created a spiritual string interladng the wounds. Likewise, they should
address Mary and the saints. Tlie instructions ofsister Lubbe evoke the image
ofa rosary stringwith the Pater Nosterbeadsin the shape ofthe disembodied
wounds ofChrist (Figure27). This evocation isjustified, asbecomes apparent
from the Sister Book of the convent ofSt Agnes in Emmerich. According to
sister Bed de Mushoel (d. 1481), who also helped the young sisters with their
spinning work, Christ, Mary, and the saints would prefer the spun yarn to a
recited Pater Noster or Ave Maria.^
The spinning of words through the wounds of Christ is visualized in
miniatures. IntheLondonprayerbook,a pasted-inminiature depictingthe Five
WoundsofChristprecedesa devodonalexercisethatshoulddriveawaysleepand
boredom while the reader is attending Mass (Figure 25>). 56The lozenges in the
comers represent the wounds of the hands and feet, while the side wound
occupies the central part ofthe miniature.The almond-shaped opening offers
a viewofthewoundedheartofChrist.A scrollpenetrates theheartseveraltimes,
like the weft threads in a fabric that move in and out of the warp. Here, the
thread has been expanded into a scroll so that it can carry words upon it.57
De Man, Hier Beginnen Sommige, p xluc, and Spitzen, 'Het leven der eerwaardige
moeder', p. zoi.
De Man, Hier Beginnen Sommige, pp 52-^3
" Schwesternbuch und Statuten, ed. by Bollmann and Staubach, p. 246.
56Add. MSi4042, fol. 337v.'
The text on the scroll reads: 'domimis amo / rewind-/ rarus / est', meaning: 'the Lord
iswounded out oflove'. The second part of the inscription is turned upside down following
the movement of the scroll.
(Ajniu33 tpu33:ixTsjo jsu-enb isjy '^^soqusSoi-o^ -s^
/{qi ssoj \Z££
jgX-EjJ
T
JO 3§T3d
-joj
01UO
'z-t^o^i
^]A^ -ppv
'^JBjqi q
[snT jg 'uopuoq '>[ooq
i.
p3 1ST3d gjnj-EruTui (ism-(^) jo spuno^ SAIJ sqj^ . 6z
3jn§ij
'TJ^^-
f^.-^yyi
5^ :.5^
y >J^ ^
J
' i.^. a. ^ -.
". '" i.
^'"t
,. <<'w-7
?y??'' :''?t ..
titl
tSf '^&'^^^~-tv.\''-'i I
3£§^NII
7*.~ '..
'- ,[{^
'yi'-. '' \
w
"^ A
^w
.
%tt<>?s^
sii
v'^fv^
.
ua^dsy um asfsuuvj-f
<1.
!<-».
t^f-t f
r^^''
J'"^
A. '
!*
4 .'
_^ ^;,
" .-<
i. ^*'\
001
PRAYING,THREADING,ANDADORNING
101
Illustrations in otherprayer books depictthesamesubject, including a miniature
in the Hours of Margriet Uutenham. 58The scroll is longer and bears another
text, but it is woven through the almond-shaped opening ofthewound in die
same way as the scroll in the London prayer book. Also appearing In cheap,
mass-produced pewter badges, this iconography occurs regularly, indicatingits
wide audience. Such a badge, now in a private collection, was found in s-
Hertogenbosch (Collection H. J. E. van Beuningen, inv. no. 3230; Figure 30). ?9
'-1
Figure 30. Words woven through the wounded heart, pewter
badge, Cothen, Collection H. J. E. van Beuningen, inv. no. 3230
s-Hertogenbosch,1400-50
London, Sotheby's, 3 December 2002, lot 79. For an illustration, see The Golden Age of
Dutch Manuscript Pointing [exhibition catalogue], ed. by Henri L. M. Defoer, Anne S.
Korteweg, and Wilhelmina C. M. Wustefeld, with intro. by James H. Marrow (Stuttgart:
Belser, 1989), fig. X. 89.
59 For this and other badges with the same iconography, see Van Beuningen and
Koldeweij, Heiligenprofaan, I, no. 902,andII,nos1900-02. Elevenlatemedieval badgeswith
this imagery were recently found in Valenciennes. SeeArnaud Tixador, Enseignes Sacrees et
Profanes Medievales Decozwertes a Valenciennes. Un Peu Plus d'un Kilogmmme d'Histoire
(Valenciennes: Service Archeologique de Valenciennes, 2004), p. 90, nos 163-73.
HannekevanAsperen
102
A scroll bearing the text 'Amour' is woven through the centre of the heart,
harking back to the wound of Christ. The notion ofspinning and weaving as a
devodonal practice was certainly not limited to the convent. As sister Lubbe van
Swolle instructed her pupils, the devotee pulls a-spiritual thread of prayer
through the wounded heart.
The exemplary lives ofthe nuns at the Meester Geertshuis, the Lamme van
Diezehuis, and the convent ofStAgnes reveal that spinning- creating a thread
- and praying were united metaphorically. Even though the London prayer
book was not written in a convent of the Sisters of the Common Life, the
manuscript indicates the influence of the Devotio Moderna, which strongly
emphasized personal meditation and physical labour. The importance of the
Devotio Moderna to the London codex is hardly surprising. This religious
movement did not just set the tone for the spiritual life of the Brothers and
Sisters of the Common Life and the Windesheim congregation that were the
direct results ofGeert Grate's reforms, but also for convents of the Third Order
of St Francis. 60 Many houses of the Sisters of the Common Life adopted the
Third Rule ofSt Francis, as did the convent ofMarienburg in 's-Hertogenbosch
where the London prayer book possibly originated and circulated.
At Franciscan convents, spinning, sewing, and weaving took up an equally
important part ofthe dailypractice. 62For example, archival sources indicate the
weaving activities of the women of the Agnietenhuis in Kampen, who accepted
the Rule of the Third Order of St Francis before 1423. 3 The convent possessed
various looms for weaving wool and linen fabrics. Furthermore, the processing
of the crude wool was among the activities of the Tertiary sisters. During the
excavations offifteenth- and early sixteenth-century cesspools at the former site
R. Th. M. van Dijk, 'Devotio Moderna', in Lexikon fur Theologie und Kirche, ecl. by
Michael Buchberger and others, li vols (Freiburg: Herder, 1993-2001), III, cols 173-74.
Schoengen, M. onasticon Batavum, I, p. ill, and Schutjes, Geschiedenis, p. 491. On the
subject of convents adopting the Third Rule of Saint Francis, see R. R. Post, Kerkgeschiedenis
van Nederland in de Middeleeuiuen, z vols (Utrecht: Het Spectrum, 1957), I, pp. 350-51 and II,
p. 160.
62 Dalmadus van Heel, 'De Tertiarissen van het Utrechtse Kapittel', Archief' voor de
Geschiedenis van het Aartsbisdom Utrecht, 63 (1939), 1-382 (p. 57), and W^illem Moll,
Kerkgeschiedenisva. nNederla. nd. v66r deHervorming, zvols (Arnhem: Nijhoff; Utrecht: Kemink,
1864-71). "- P- 97.
De Susteren van Sanct-Agnetenhiius. De Geschiedenis, Materiele Cultuur en Spiritualiteit
van hetKampenseAgnietenconvent, ed. by F.van der Pol andM. Smit (Kampen: IJsselacademie,
1997). PP- i2-16-
PRAYING,THREADING,ANDADORNING
103
oftheconvent, several objects related to spinningandsewingwereretrieved,
suchasthespools andsticksofwoodenspindles andcopperpins forsewing. 64
Rosary beads of bone and agatewere also found. In the Tertiary convent of
Marienburg thesisters passed the time with spinning, as becomes clearfrom a
contemporary description of the iconoclastic outbreak in 's-Hertogenbosch:
when an anonymous resident of Marienburg chronicled the horrors that fell
upon herconvent between1566and1575,shementioned thespinningactivities
ofthesisters on several occasions. 65A late sixteenth-century prayer bookfrom
Marienburg (Leiden, Gemeentearchief, MS 72045) mentions a weaving house
at the convent. 66Also in Barbaradal, all kinds of handiwork, like sewing,
knitting, spinning, andweaving, were part ofthe dailyroutine. 67
Textile work andprayer, physical andspiritual labour,went together. The
metaphor ofprayer asa threadshapeddepictions offemalesaintswhospent
(part of) their lives in a cloistered community. St Gertrude was abbess at the
Benedictine conventinNivAs until, attheageofthirty, sheresignedheroffice
inordertodevotehertimetoprayerandreading. 68AlthoughGertrudewasnever
formally canonized, her cult spread quickly from the Low Countries to the
surrounding lands. Late medieval depictions showthe saint absorbed in books
or in handiwork. In a late fifteenth-century woodcut in the German printed
editionofThe GoldenLegend, Gertrude, wearingthehabit,isseatedona bench
in a chapel interior (Munchen, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, 2°Inc. c. a. 1073-2;
Figure 31). Presumably, the scene is situated in a convent. Sister Gertrude holds
a distaff between her knees, while the yarn is passing tlirough her hands.
Meanwhile,hereyesarefocusedonanaltarpiece depleting theVirgininSole,in
front ofwhich she busily constructs her thread.
Gertrude's spinning illustrates her diligence andherhumility before God.
Afterall, Gertrudeledanexemplarylifeasa nun. Theprintmaydepicta real
64DeSusterenvanSanct-Agnetenhuus,ed.byVanderPolandSmit,pp. 69,8i,and89.
Kroniek eener Klposterzuster van het Voormalig Bossche Klooster 'Marienburg' over de
Troebelente^-Hertogenbosche. e.in de-jaren1566-1575,ed.byH. vanAlfen ('s-Hertogenbosch:
ProvinciaaiGenootschapvanKunstenenWetenschappeninNoord-Brabant, 1931),pp.3,27,
and 59.
' Leiden,Gemeentearchief,MS7204$.SeeKoldeweij,'Lijfelijkeengeestelijkepelgrimage',
p. 232.
/ Van de Meerendonk, Het Klooster, p. 37.
'MireilleMadou, DeHeiligeGertrudisvanNijvel,i vols(Brussels:KoninxlijkeAkademie
voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsren van Belgie, 1975).
HannekevanAsperen
104
situation, since -che working houses in female convents are known to have
included altarpieces. More importantly, however, the spinning has a
metaphorical meaning:whileperforming herdevotions, sheispulling a thread
throughherprayers andmeditations. PerhapsGertrude isconstructing a rosary,
for after all, the image depicting the Virgin in Sole was closely related to the
ross^ry. The image suggests that,while praying to Mary and meditating on the
life ofthe Virgin, Gertrude is spinning a thread ofprayers and meditations.
^t. ^-^^t-y1~'Si
.
i^m^ssiF
Figure 31. Gertrude ofNivelles, woodcut book illustfadon in Jacobus de Voragine,
Der Heiligen Leben, Winterteil (Urach: Conrad Fyner, 1481), Munchen, Bayerische
Staatsbibliothek, 2°Inc. c. a. 1073-2, fol. 237". Germany, 1481.
PRAYING, THREADING, AND ADORNING
io5
With the thread that the worshipper creates, she interconnects the elements
ofherprayer Shealsoconnectsherselfwiththesacred,negotiatingbetweenthe
earthly and the heavenly realms. In the visual arts, a look towards the saint.
written words, or a scroll connecting the mouth ofthe devotee with the mouth
oftheother-visualising thenon-material wordsoftheprayer- expressesthis
connecdon. 69AminiaturedepletingtheVirginandChildattheincipitofthe
HoursoftheVirginintheHoursofMargaretofClevesillustratesthispoint. 70
In themargin, thepatron ofthemanuscriptkneelsbefore^prie-dieu.Around
herneck Margaretwears a rosarystring, andherhandsarefoldedin prayer.
Christgripstheendofthescroll thatrunsfrom thehandsofthedevotee (in the
margin) tothesacredimage(inthecentralminiature). Thewordsofherprayer
haveformed a tangible thread that connects thesuppliant with thesacred.
Theimageofa rosarystringcanrepresentintangibleprayeraswell. Ona late
fifteenth-century painting by the Master of St Gudule in the Musee d'Art
Religieux et d'Art Mosan in Liege, an unidentified donor kneels in front ofthe
VirginandChild. 71Herprayerbookliesopenbeforeheron^prie-dieu,buther
eyes are directed at the sacred image in front ofher. In her folded hands, she
holds oneendofa rosarystring, while Christ holds the other end. Like the scroll
in the Cleves Hours, the rosary string connotes prayer materialized. The Ave
prayers ofthe anonymous commissioner havetransformed into red beads, and
thePaterNostersintogoldenpendants.Prayerisnotrepresentedmetaphorically,
buttangibly.Bothimages,theminiaturedepictingMargaretofGlevesandthe
painting in Liege, make plain the same concept: the prayer creates a thread, a
vital link to the sacred.
While praying, the devotee threaded the meditations of the prayer, the
spiritualexercises andthephysicallabour; theworshipper andtheworshipped.
Theconnectingthreadisrealisedthroughtheactofprayer.Likeprayeritself,the
meditations of the London prayer book comprise both textual and pictorial
elements. The actualthreadservesthesamepurposeasthespiritual thread. It
joins theprayertextsandtheimagesthatconstitute thespiritual exercise.Like
69MeyerSchapiro,Words,ScriptandPictures:SemioticsofVisualLanguage(NewYork:
Braziller, 1996).
Lisbon,Museu Calouste Gulbenkian,MS LA148,fol. 19".For aniUustraiion, seeThe
GoldenAge, ed. byDefoer, Koneweg, andWustefeld, fig. I.ia.
71Foran illustration, seeThe Burgundian Netherlands, ed. byWalter Prevenier andWim
Blockmans (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), fig. 2.
Hannekevan Asperen
io6
thespunyarninthedevotionsofGertrudeofNivellesandtheexemplarysisters
in the Sister Books, the thread interweaves the essential elements ofthe prayer.
Adorning the Virgin
Thestitches in the Londonprayer bookarenotjust a wayofattachment. The
shape and the colours of the stitches are elaborated for the purpose of the
decorative effect. Because ofthe zigzag and cross patterns, the stitches become
anornamental element akinto embroider^ a textile technique usedspecifically
for embellishment (Plate 4 and Figure 32).
InthecaseoftheLondonprayerbook, theembroideryharmonizeswiththe
text. The coloured stitches alternate, asdo the blue and red initials. Furthermore,
theyechotherepetitive pattern oftherosaryprayers. There arealsosimilarities
between thestitchedwreathsandactual rosatystrings. The decorative border is
madeofsimplematerials,asweremostofthemedievalrosaries.Often,devotees
counted their prayers on modest, knotted strings, not threaded beads. 72Nuns
who were urged to cultivate humility used simple rosaries. The Rule of the
Convent of St Agnes explicitly warns the sisters to avoid curiousness,
sumptuousness and copiousness' in their paternosters. 73 Humble rosaries
comprisedhumblematerials.Forexample,StCatherineofSiena,a memberof
the Dominican Third Order, hada prayer string ofa knotted cord, becauseits
simplicity and modesty showed her humility before God. 74The sisters ofthe
Windesheim congregation at Diepenveen provide another example: as an
exercise in meekness, some ofthe sisters at the convent made rosaries out ofthe
buttons of old nightdresses. 75
72 soojahre Rosenkranz, p. 61;Wilkins, The Rose-Garden Game, p. 33, andWinston-Allen,
Stones ofthe Rose, p. 14.
73 Nikolaus Staubauch and Anne. Bollmann were unsure how to translate the word
'nosteren', which clearly means 'paternosters': Schwesternbuch und Statuten, ed. by Bollmann
and Stauhach, p. 313. The
manuscript
in
which the rules
were
handed down,
was
written in
1676, but the regulations probably stem from an older tradition, because they do not seem to
have been influenced by reforms: ibid., pp. 24-25.
74Lightbown, MediaevalEuropeanJewellery,pp. 345and352.SisterMechteltvanKalker
[sic: Kalkar] ofthe convent ofSaintAgnes in Emmerich alsopossesseda rosaryofa knotted
cord; see Schwesternbuch und Statuten, ed. by Bollmann and Staubach, p. 255.
75 Van den Doechden, ed. by Brinkerink, p. 14.
PRAYING, THREADING, AND ADORNING
'- ^'^-^
^''-^VT'^'
'^
107
^F^^^
^''
%J/^ '
&^3t.
^ . '^' .
.
<?
i-
IW
i^\
1'K
^^^y^^^w^. ^ ^ * f^-V^^^~^.^iy
^< - - x --x-- x-x-;:x";:x'":^:r:
v^, /".,/-./'. /- ^-. ^ ^/ .. /...,<<-;
'4
Figure 32. The Nativity, hand-coloured effgraving sewn into a prayer book,
London, British Library, Add. MS 14042, fol. 98".Possibly 's-Hertogenbosch, first
quarter of sixteenth century?
Hannekevan Asperen
io8
Devotees also used silk threads, such as those in the London prayer book, to
create rosary strings. The SanktKatharinentalerSchwesternbzich, a German Sister
Bookin the samegenre asthe bookfrom Deventer, describes thevirtues ofthe
Dominican sisters in a convent near Diefienhofen, including a certain sister
Dlemut von Lindau.76 Like the other biographies in the Sister Book, the text
explains her exemplary virtue, already revealed byher first name, whichmeans
humility. The story relates that sister Diemut wondered how sheshould spend
the Advent, because she was unsure how to pray. In a vision, Christ appeared
and gave her a rosary ofred and green silk threads. When sister Diemut asked
him what it meant, Christ told her that che green colour symbolized his human
nature and the red his divmity. The two natures ofChrist were united in Mary,
expressed by the joining of the two threads. With this consideration in mind,
Diemut should braid and unbraid the cord. Like the wreaths around the prints,
her rosary string comprised simple but significant red and green silk threads. 77
The simplicity ofthe rosary expressed her humility before God, like the rosary
strings of Catherine ofSiena and the sisters at Diepenveen.
Besidesformal similarities between thestitches andactualrosarystrings, there
is also a resemblance regarding the purpose of the stitches and rosary prayers.
Thestitched borderswreathetheimages ofMary, liketherosaries in theLondon
prayer bookareintended to do. The readeroftheLondonmanuscript - when
reading devoutly andpatiently - is making ornaments for theVirgin through
prayer. 78In this type ofdevotion, the prayer is transformed into an object'that
76 Das Katharinentaler Schwesternbuch. Untersuchung, Edition, Kommentar, ed. by Ruth
Meyer (Tiibingen: Max Niemeyer, 1995), p. 117. On \lhe Katharinenthaler Schwesternbuch,^
also Hamburger, Nuns as Artists, p. 185, and Weekes, Early Engravers, pp. 180-81. For the
differences between Dutch and German Sister Books, see Jongen and Scheepsma, 'Wachten
op deHemelseBruidegom', ^y. y6-'ij, w(\. Schwe5ternbuch undStatiiten, ed. byBollmannand
Staubach, p. 20.
77 Weekes, Early Engravers, pp. 180-81, points out the striking similarities between the
colours and materials. A connection between the colours of the rosary and the stitches, the first
from a convent near Diefienhofen and the second from the vicinity of Brussels, is difficult to
demonstrate. More meaningful istheanalogybetween austere materials. After all, the religious
communities shared ideals of humility and simplicity.
78 Much has been said and written about the transformation of prayer into objects
(flowers, stones). See, for example Thomas Lentes, 'Die Gewander der Heiligen: Bin
Diskussionsbeitrag zum Verhaltnis vpn Gebet, Bild und Imagination', in Hagiographie und
Kunst: Der Heiligenkult in Schrift, Bild und Architektur, ed. by Gottfried Kerscher (Berlin:
Dietrich Reimer, 1993), pp. 120-51;Eugene Honee, 'Beeld en verbeelding in de middeleeuwse
gebedsculcuur. Een kerkhistorische beschouwing', m Gebedin Schoonheid. Schatten van prive-
PRAYING,THREADING,ANDADORNING
IQC)
is presented to Christ, the Virgin,or a saint. The object could be a piece of
clothing or headgear for the Virgin, an attribute for a saint, even a house or a
crib for Christ, to namejust a fewpossibilities. The offerings hadanimportant
purpose: to bring delight to the addressed person. The gifts were also a trading
device to be deployed for more selfish reasons. The decorations that the devotee
offered to the Virgin would be noted and remembered, so that when the time
came, the devotee could expect a favour in return. 79At the same time on a more
practical level, the object sensed as a mental picture, a mnemonic device. The
visual image could be stored in the mind and recalled to remember the number
of prayers. 80
In the London prayer book, the majority of prayers concentrate on the
creation of a wreath or a crowning of Mary. The set of rosaries of the feasts of
the Virgin is called a 'pristine arbour ofroses and many flowers'. 81The devotee
can read flowers' from the text 'to make the Virgin a small chaplet'. Even the
rosariesofthe Sorrows of Mary
are
called
'chaplets
of roses3. 82 The
reading of the
prayer makes the flower present. Together, the prayers form a string or wreath
that can be offered to (an image of) Maty. This was a familiar concept,
illustrated in thelegendofthemanwhousedto adorna statueofMarywithreal
devotie in Europa, ed. by Henk van Os (Zwolle: Waanders, 15)94), pp. 157-74 (pp. 170-72);
Jeffrey F. Hamburger, The Visual and the Visionary: Art and Female Spirituality in Late
Medieval Germany (New York: Zone Books, 1998), p. 78. In Hier beginnen sommige stichtige
punten, the story ofa nun is told who usedto build a wooden house 'ofvarious devout prayers
and exercises' for the Christ child on the day ofhis birth: De Man, Hier Beginnen Sommige,
p. 218.
79 Add. MS 14042, fols 230"-23ir. Following a rosary of the five wounds and the Solve
Regina, the nun writes: Ende ic bid v nerstelic dat hi ontfanckelic / moet si]n dijnre hooger
maijesteijt Op dat/ eick van desen bloemkens van v / gescreuen moeten worden in dat boec
/ des leuens Op dat wi dan weder / loen van v mijn lieue wtuercoren / vrouwe ontfangen
mogen . For a comparable rosary prayer, see Anne Margreet W. As-Vijvers, 'More than
Marginal Meaning? The Interpretation of Ghent-Bruges Border Decoration', Oud Holland,
116(2003), 3-33 (pp. 29-30, n. 38), asw.ell asAs-Vijvers's article in this volume. Seealso Honee,
Beeld en verbeelding', p. 171, and Hamburger, The Visual, pp. 234 arid 301.
Mary J. Carruthers, The Book of Memory: A. Study of Memory in Medieval Culture
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990). Qn the rosary as mnemonic, see Carruthers,
The Book ofMemory, p. 80.
81 Add. MS 14042, fol. 6z'.
82 Add. MS 14042, fol. i23r.
Hanneke van Asperen
110
wreaths offlowers. 83After he became a lay brother, he had to perform so many
tasks that he was not able to payher this service anymore. Sensitive to the needs
ofthe lay brother, a priest advised him to recite fifty Aves each day. Maty would
prefer this to all the chaplets he ever made. One day, while he was praying, Mary
appeared to him. With every Ave, she picked a beautiful rose from his mouth
and braided her own wreath of flowers. Stories of pious nuns tell the same: on
leaving their mouths, their prayers transformed into roses. 4 The metaphor ofthe
rose is befitting for hymns ofpraise, especially for the Virgin and for Christ, the
roses that the enclosed garden brought forth. Because of this association, a
collection ofwritten prayers could be called a garden or, as in the words of the
London prayer book, an arbour.
The notion ofprayer transforming into a tangible offering returns time and
time again in the London prayer book. Roses were a popular image, but prayers
are notjust flowers. They can be all sorts ofconstructing elements. In reciting a
prayer called a 'crown', the believer makes Mary a diadem. In adding prayers, the
reader can addprecious stones to the crown: a diamond in the front, a carbuncle
to the right, a ruby to the left and a pearl on the back. 85 The prayer that
concludes the set ofrosaries of the Sorrows (fols i23r-i39r) is a crown of thorns
(fols i38r-i39r). Besides the wreath of roses and the wreath of precious stones
appropriate ornaments ofMary, so it seems - the devotee can also make her a
wreath of thorns. 86 In celebrating the Sorrows of the Virgin - the reason why
she intercedes for mankind - the devotee makes Mary a wreath of thorns to
resemble the one Christ wore on the cross. After all, every branch and every
thorn that hurt Christ wounded Mary as well. The combinations of Aves and
Pater Nosters transform into flowers and precious stones, even thorns. Evety
3 'Winston-Allen, Stories ofthe Rose, pp. 100-01; Lentes, 'Die Gewander', p. 123; yooJahre
Rosenkranz, pp. $8-59, and Wilkins, The Rose-Garden Game, p. 16$.
84 Dos Katharinentaler Schwesternbiich, ed. by Meyer, pp. 101-02.
5 Add. MS 14042, fols i97"-i98r. Of course, this was no new concept. In a miniature in
the Vie de Sainte Benoite from 1318 (Staa. tliche Museen zu Berlin, Kupferstichkabinett, MS 78
B 16, fol. 56"), the commissioner kneels in front of an image of Mary. At the same time, an
angel places a crown on top of the statue. For an illustration, see Hamburger, The Visual, fig.
1. 30.
For prayers ofthe crown ofthorns of Mary, seeMaria Meertens, De Godsvritcht in de
Nederlanden naar Handschriften van Gebedenboeken derXVe eeiiw, ^ vols (Mechelen: Tessens,
l930-34)> Iv> P- ^' and J. A. F. Kronenburg, Maria's Heerlijkheid. Geschiedkimdige schets van
de vereering der H. Maagd in ons va. clerla. nd, van de eerste tijden tot op onze dagen, 9 vols
(Amsterdam: Bekker, 1904-31), II, p. 231.
PRAYING, THREADING, AND ADORNING
Ill
time, they are a different kind of composing element, another sort of stitch in
the wreath.
The decorations of the London prayer book visualize the intention of the
prayer texts. The ornamental programme gives expression to the same desire to
wreathe the Virgin. To -mspire the devotee to create a tangible ofFering,
sometimes a tangible Image ofthe saintwas needed. A rubric ofa rosary prayer
in the London prayer book insists that the devotee reads the prayer in front of
an image ofMary: This prayer wassentfrom heaven andwhenyou readit, you
should stand in front ofan image ofOur DearLadyMary. Stand on your feet
asyou arereciting ten[Ave\ Mariasandkneel duringtheprayer[Pater Noster}\87
To make surethe instructions were followed, the compiler oftheprayer book
addeda woodcut print ofMary (Figure 33). Maryis holding the Christ child,
who is already carrying the cross. A rosary string, like the one that the reader is
aboutto create, framesthetwofigures. 88Thedepicted rosarywreathes a tangible
imageofMary, like theprayerswreathethespiritualimagesoftheVirgin. The
stitched borders fulfil the same function.
The sister- possibly a Btrgittine, butmore likely a Tertiary - who created
the London codex, added the stitches to the pages to adorn the subject ofher
prayers andto interweave theelements ofherspiritual exercises. Through prayer,
shecreated a spiritual thread onwhichshecould string hertextual andpictorial
meditations. The material threads in the London prayer book serve the same
purpose; they tie the prayer text andits images together. Moreover, the thread
takes the shape of a wreath that adorns the prints. Undoubtedly, the stitches
reminded the sisters oftheirhumble rosarystrings consisting ofknotted cords
and simple threads. The red and green-yellow stitches, maybe reminiscent of
Christ's dual nature like the rosarystring ofDiemutvon Lmdau, form a visual
counterpart to the spiritual wreaths of words and meditations that the devotee
created to pleaseMary. By addingthe stitched borders to the images ofMary,
thesisterwhowrote andcompiled the Londonprayerbookvisualized theideas
Add. MS 14042, fol. i6zr: Want / dit gebet is v&nden hemel comen ende wa.nneer I du
dit gebet leset so suldie sta.en voer onsei I lieuen vrouwen ma. na beelde. Sprect x mariii I
alstaende En^e gebet al knijeende'.
Perhaps an even better illustration ofthispoint is the image ofthe Virgin andChild in
a manuscript in the Vatican Library, MS vat. lat. 3770, fol. zoor. The small miniature is
represented asa panelpaintingwith a broadframe.A rosarystringin front ofthepicture frame
wreathesthefiguresofmother andchild.Foranillustration, seeRingbom, 'MariainSole ,fig:
45C.
Hannekevan Asperen
112
that lie behind the rosary prayers. She illustrated one of the main goals of the
rosary prayer book: the wreathing of the Virgffi.
; al ^rf/
-
Jf^f.gs
jll
-1-1
//j
'^i
?1
^
W-'^Si^
<.
P.+
^
... 31
^T%^
.
s^-w^s
-..y
WRME*i.*fiE£? .AWrfW^ ^i^-^*"^"^'
f. yt^f
-<-'* I
-^
'j^:W2
^ i^&K ^s ».5.i^ <;-r.'. i^^^^
"
IT ..
^
? /. ^
'?
/?
^
yr^E^i^te^^. ^ <:i^^u>'^
Figure 33. The Virgin in the Rosary, hand-coloured woodcut pasted onto page of
a prayer book, London, British Library, Add. MS 14042, fol. i6i". Marienwater?,
c. 1500
PRAYING, THREADING, AND ADORNING
ii3
In conclusion, the London codex combines several aspects that played an
important part in the spiritual life of nuns at the beginning of the sixteenth
century: individual meditation, textile work, and the rosary devotion. The
different activities at convents, whetherphysical or spiritual, wereinextricably
connected. Textile work and prayer laced together the physical and spiritual
reflection of one devotional act. Even though every act of labour could be
coupled with spiritual meditations, light monotonous activities werepreferable.
Spinning especially, was a popular activity because it was not bound to one
place: the yarn of prayer could be spun anywhere. The metaphor of
thread-threading, the basis of the devotional exercises that accompanied the
spinning work, especially the rosary, is essential to the understanding of the
London codex. The rosary devotion actually translates the manual act of
stringinginto a spiritual exercise.Thethreadtiesthebooktogether. In usingthe
stitches to compose and embellish the rosary prayer book, the sister joined
several elements that are united metaphorically: text and textile, thread and
prayer, rosary and wreath.
Appendix
The Contents andDecorative Programme ofLondon, British Library, Add. MS
140-42.
The sewn-in prints (or formerly) appear in bold type.
Folios
Text
Woodcuts and Engravings
?r-6ir
Psalter of Our Lady:
4Y Pasted-in woodcut with the
Prologue
Our Lady
$ -6f
to
the Psalter of
7r-24r First part of the Psalter
24 -4I Second part of the Psalter
4ir-57v Third part of the Psalter
$7v-6ir Prayer to Mary
62r-i22r
Rosaries of the Life of Mary:
62-67" Immaculate Conception
67r-73r Birth of Mary
Virgin in Sole (Marienwater)
6 Pasted-in engraving with the
Virgin in the Rosary
(Monogrammist LPX?),
replacing a sewn-in print
61 Sewn-in woodcut of the
Holy Family in an enclosed
garden (Marienwater)
74r-8ir Presentation of Mary in
the Temple
73V Sewn-in woodcut
82-90 Annunciation
8iv Sewn-in woodcut of the
of the
Presentation (Marienwater?)
Annunciation
9ir-98rVisitation
90V Sewn-in woodcut of the
Visitation (Marienwater?)
5>9f-i05V Nativity
98 Sewn-in engraving of the
Nativity
io6r-ii2r Childbed of Mary
io6 Pasted-in woodcut of the
Narivity (Marienwater?)
U3r-ii7r Candlemas
ii8r-j22r
Assumpt ion
ii2v Sewn-in engraving of the
Holy Family
ii7v Pasred-in woodcut of the
Assumpt iQn (Marienwater?)
HannekevanAsperen
u6
Folios
Text
Woodcuts and Engravings
l23r-i39r
Rosaries of the Sorrows of Mary:
i22v Pasted-in engraving of the
i23r-i27r Bearing of the Cross
Bearing of the Cross
i27v Pasted-in engraving of the
Crucifixion, replacing a
i28I -i32r Cruciflxion
sewn-in print
I33f-I37rMourning
I37v-I38r Prayer to Mary
i3Sr-i39r Prayer on the crown of
thorns of Mary
i39v-i50r
Rosaries of the Sorrows of Mary:
132" Pasted-in engraving with
Mourning over the Dead
Christ
I39V Pasted-in woodcut ofIVlater
Dolorosa (Marienwater?)
i40r-i4l' Circumcision (Sunday)
l40r Pasted-in woodcut of the
Circumcision
l4iv-i42v Flight into Egypt
(Monday)
i43r-i44r Christ in the Temple
(Tuesday)
i44r-i45r Bearing of the Cross
(Wednesday)
l45v-l46v Crucifixion (Thursday)
i4iv Pasted-in woodcut of the
Flight into Egypt
i43r Pasted-in woodcut of Christ
in the Temple
l44r Pasted-in woodcut of the
Bearing of the Cross
i45" Pasted-in woodcut of the
Crucifixion
i46v-i47" Mourning (Friday)
i4<?v Pasted-in woodcut of the
Mourning
i47v-i49r Entombment
(Saturday)
i47v Pasted-in woodcut of the
Entombment
i49r-i50r Prayer to Mary
i50v-i57v
Several prayers of the Seven
Sorrows
i57v-I6or
Prayers to Mary
i6ov-i6ir
Rosary of the Joys of Mary
i6ir-i67r
Rosary of 100 Aves
i6iv Pasted-in woodcut of the
Virgin in the Rosary
(Marienwater?)
APPENDDC
117
Folios
Text
i67r-F72. v
Seven Psalms
i73r-i75v
Obsecro Te in Middle Dutch
i75v-i77r
Prayer to Mary
i77r-i78r
Five Aves
178-185"
Rosaries of the Seven Joys called a
.
Woodcuts and Engravings
i78v Pasted-in woodcut of Mary
Crown of the 72 Names of
and Jesus with Catherine and
Mary:
Barbara (Marienwater)
i79r Prologue
i79r-I79v Annunciation
i79v-I8ov Visitation
i8ov-i8ir Nativity
i8ir-i8iv Three Kings
i8iv-i82r Finding of Christ in the
Temple
i82r-i82VAscension
i82v-i83v Pentecost
183 -i85v Prayer on the Seven Joys
i86r-i88r
Two prayers of the Twelve
Honours of Mary
i88v-i98T
Little Psalter:
i88v-i9ir First rosary
191 -i92v Second rosary
i92. v-i94v Third rosary
194 -19 6V First
crown
ic)6 -197'' Second crown
I97r-i97v Third crown
I97 -198 Prayers for precious
stones
198-203
203
-20 6V
Two prayers to Mary
Litany of Mary
i88v Pasted-in engraving of Mary
and Jesus on crescent crowned
by angels
Hanneke van Asperen
u8
Woodcuts and Engravings
Folios
Text
2o6v-2i8r
Several prayers to Mary
2i8r-22iv
Psalter of the Name of Mary
2. 2iv-2. 3if
Short rosary of the Five Wounds
23lr-235v
Rosary to Mary
235V -2. 37F
Ten Virtues of Mary
237r-2. 38r
Prayer to Mary of 700 Aves
239r-2. 45v
Crown of Thorns (rosary) for the
238V Pasted-ln engraving of the
Mocking of Christ
days of the week:
239r Prologue
2. 39v-240r Sunday
2.40r-2.4Ir Monday
24ir-2-4IVTuesday
24iv-242. v Wednesday
242."-243r Thursday
243r-2.44' Friday
244I -245" Saturday
246r-z6or
Golden Litany of the Life and
Passion of Christ
2^ov-2. 74r
Mass of Gregory
26ov Pasted-in engraving of the
Mass of Gregory
274v-2-82r
Two rosaries of the Sacrament
2.
74V Pasted-in engraving with the
Manna and the Last Supper
2.
82V-2. 86V
Rosary of the
Name of Christ
282V Pasted-in woodcut of the
IHS monogram
(Mlarienwater?)
2. 86v-2. 9ir
Rosary to the guardian angel
287 Pasted-in illumination of the
guardian angel
29lv-2-99r
Rosary to Peter
2. 9iv Pasted-in engraving of Peter
APPENDK
ii9
Folios
Text
Woodcuts and Engravings
299v-3o8v
Rosary to Catherine
299 Pasted-in engraving of
Catherine
3o8v-3i2r
Prayer to the crucified Christ
3i2r-3i5r
Prayer to the Agnus Dei
312 Pasted-in woodcut of the
Agnus Dei in a rose wreath
(Marienwater?)
31? -337r
Several prayers to Christ
338-374
Devout exercises during Mass
337 Pasted-in miniature of the
Five Wounds of Christ
374r-375r .
Prayer to the Cross
37?V-376V
Prayer
to
Michael
376V-377V
Prayer
to
Gabriel
378r-38or
Prayer to Catherine
38or-382r
Prayer to Agnes
382r-383r
Prayer to Barbara
3§4r-384v
Rosary to Barbara
383" Pasted-in illumination with
Bridget of Sweden between
Sts. Barbara and Amalberga of
Munsterbilzen
384v-38?r
Prayer to Bridget of Sweden
38?r-386r
Prayer to Petronella
386r
Prayer to God
386-387r
Prayer to Apollonia
38yr
Prayer to Mary Magdalene
Hannekevan Asperen
120
Folios
Text
Woodcuts and Engravings
387v-393r
Several prayers to Anne
387V Pasted-in woodcut
or
engraving ofAnne, Mary and
Jesus and the Trinity
(Mono gram mist IA)
393r-394v
Prayer to all saints
395r-396r
Prayer to all angels
3c;6r-398r
Prayer to John the Baptist
398v-400r
Two prayers to Francis
39§v Pastecl-in illumination with
the Stigmadzadon of Francis
400r-400v
Prayer to Jerome
40ov-40lr
Prayer to an apostle
40iv-402. r
Prayer to all apostles
402r-402. v
Prayer to all patriarchs and
prophets
all martyrs
402"-403V
Prayer
403v-4°4r
Prayer to all confessors
404I-4°4V
Prayer
404-405
Prayer
405v-4°7r
Confession
to
to a
saint
w
?/?t\
.
?f
''' 1' il
Jyl II I
r^
llj IL^i
-'^^.^
n
' t'/.. A, "
^'., 1.
-C:^. fc.<;
y^-i^
%R~S,, 4®^
.
v;^'1;.,'<t>l
.>
Plate4.TheHolyFamilyinanenclosedgardenwitha Tertiary,hand-coloured
woodcutsewnintoa prayerbook,London,BritishLibrary,Add.MSi404z,"fol.
61'. Marienwater, c. 1500.
0
Plate 5. The Holy Familyin an enclosedgardenwith a Birgittine, hand-coloured
woodcut, Amsterdam, Rijksmuseum, inv. no. RP-P-I955-328.Marienwater,
c. 1500.