This page intentionally left blank
Biogeography of Microscopic Organisms
Is Everything Small Everywhere?
Bringing together the viewpoints of leading experts in taxonomy, ecology and
�biogeography of different taxa, this book synthesises discussion surrounding the
so-called ‘Everything is everywhere’ hypothesis. It addresses the processes that
generate spatial patterns of diversity and biogeography in organisms that can
potentially be cosmopolitan.
The contributors discuss questions such as:€are microorganisms (e.g. prokaryotes, protists, algae, yeast and microscopic fungi, plants and animals) really cosmopolitan in their distribution? What are the biological properties that allow such
potential distribution? Are there processes that would limit their distribution? Are
microorganisms intrinsically different from macroscopic ones? What can microorganisms tell us about the generalities of biogeography? Can they be used for
experimental biogeography?
Written for graduate students and academic researchers, the book promotes a
more complete understanding of the spatial patterns and the general processes in
biogeography.
di e g o f on ta n e t o is a NERC Advanced Research Fellow at the Division of
Biology, Imperial College London, Ascot, UK. His research focuses on spatial patterns and processes in microscopic animals, with a particular interest in rotifers.
The Systematics Association
Special Volume Series
series editor
David J. Gower
Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, London, UK
The Systematics Association promotes all aspects of systematic biology by organising
conferences and workshops on key themes in systematics, running annual lecture
series, publishing books and a newsletter, and awarding grants in support of
systematics research. Membership of the Association is open globally to professionals
and amateurs with an interest in any branch of biology, including palaeobiology.
Members are entitled to attend conferences at discounted rates, to apply for grants
and to receive the newsletter and mailed information; they also receive a generous
discount on the purchase of all volumes produced by the Association.
The first of the Systematics Association’s publications The New Systematics (1940)
was a classic work edited by its then-president Sir Julian Huxley. Since then, more
than 70 volumes have been published, often in rapidly expanding areas of science
where a modern synthesis is required.
The Association encourages researchers to organise symposia that result in multiauthored volumes. In 1997 the Association organised the first of its international
Biennial Conferences. This and subsequent Biennial Conferences, which are
designed to provide for systematists of all kinds, included themed symposia that
resulted in further publications. The Association also publishes volumes that are
not specifically linked to meetings, and encourages new publications (including
textbooks) in a broad range of systematics topics.
More information about the Systematics Association and its publications can be
found at our website:€www.systass.org.
Previous Systematics Association publications are listed after the index for this
volume.
Systematics Association Special Volumes published by Cambridge University Press:
78. Climate Change, Ecology and Systematics
Trevor R. Hodkinson, Michael B. Jones, Stephen Waldren and John A. N. Parnell
The Systematics Association Special
Volume 79
Biogeography of
Microscopic Organisms
Is Everything Small
Everywhere?
edited by
Diego Fontaneto
Imperial College London

c a mbr idge u ni v ersit y pr ess
Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town,
Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi, Tokyo, Mexico City
Cambridge University Press
The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK
Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York
www.cambridge.org
Information on this title:€www.cambridge.org/9780521766708
© The Systematics Association 2011
This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception
and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements,
no reproduction of any part may take place without the written
permission of Cambridge University Press.
First published 2011
Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge
A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library
ISBN 978-0-521-76670-8 Hardback
Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or
accuracy of URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in
this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is,
or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
v
Contents
List of contributors
Preface
page vii
ix
Part I Theoretical framework
1 Why biogeography of microorganisms?
Diego Fontaneto and Juliet Brodie
2 Historical biogeography, microbial endemism and the role of
classification:€everything is endemic
David M. Williams
3
11
Part II Prokaryotes
3 Biogeography of prokaryotes
Donnabella C. Lacap, Maggie C.Y. Lau and Stephen B. Pointing
4 Thermophilic bacteria in cool soils:€metabolic activity and
mechanisms of dispersal
Roger Marchant, Ibrahim M. Banat and Andrea Franzetti
35
43
Part III Unicellular eukaryotes
5 Dispersal of protists:€the role of cysts and human introductions
Wilhelm Foissner
6 Everything is everywhere:€a twenty-first century de-/reconstruction
with respect to protists
David Bass and Jens Boenigk
7 Arcellinida testate amoebae (Amoebozoa: Arcellinida):€model
of organisms for assessing microbial biogeography
Thierry J. Heger, Enrique Lara and Edward A.D. Mitchell
8 Everything is not everywhere:€the distribution of cactophilic yeast
Philip F. Ganter
61
88
111
130
vi
contents
Part IV Pluricellular eukaryotes
9 Coalescent analyses reveal contrasting patterns of intercontinental
gene flow in arctic-alpine and boreal-temperate fungi
József Geml
177
10 Biogeography and phylogeography of lichen fungi and their photobionts
Silke Werth
191
11 Biogeography of mosses and allies:€does size matter?
Nagore G. Medina, Isabel Draper and Francisco Lara
209
12 Dispersal limitation or habitat quality€– what shapes the distribution
ranges of ferns?
Hanno Schaefer
13 Ubiquity of microscopic animals? Evidence from the morphological
approach in species identification
Tom Artois, Diego Fontaneto, William D. Hummon, Sandra
J. McInnes, M. Antonio Todaro, Martin V. Sørensen and
Aldo Zullini
14 Molecular approach to micrometazoans. Are they here, there
and everywhere?
Noemi Guil
234
244
284
Part V Processes
15 Microbes as a test of biogeographic principles
David G. Jenkins, Kim A. Medley and Rima B. Franklin
309
16 A metacommunity perspective on the phylo- and biogeography
of small organisms
Luc De Meester
324
17 Geographic variation in the diversity of microbial communities:€research
directions and prospects for experimental biogeography
Joaquin Hortal
335
Index
358
vii
Contributors
Tom A rtois Centre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
I br a h i m M . Ba n at School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine,
Northern Ireland, UK
Dav i d Ba s s Zoology Department, The Natural History Museum, London, UK
Je n s B oe n igk General Botany, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
Ju l i e t B rodi e Department of Botany, The Natural History Museum, London, UK
L uc D e M e e s t e r Laboratory of Aquatic Ecology and Evolutionary Biology,
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
I s a be l D r a p e r Departamento de Biología (Botánica), Facultad de Ciencias,
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
W i l h e l m Foi s s n e r FB Organismische Biologie, Universität Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
D i e g o Fon ta n e t o Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Swedish Museum of
Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden, and Division of Biology, Imperial College
London, Ascot, UK
R i m a B . F r a n k l i n Department of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University,
Richmond, VA, USA
A n dr e a F r a n z e t t i Department of Environmental Sciences, University of
Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
P h i l i p F. G a n t e r Department of Biological Sciences, Tennessee State University,
Nashville, TN, USA
Jó z s e f G e m l National Herbarium of the Netherlands, Netherlands Centre for
Biodiversity Naturalis, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
Noe m i Gu i l Department of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, National Museum
of Natural History (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
T h i e r r y J. H e ge r WSL, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape
Research, Ecosystem Boundaries Research Unit, Wetlands Research Group,
Lausanne, Switzerland; Laboratory of Ecological Systems, École Polytechnique
Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Zoology
and Animal Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; and Biodiversity
Research Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
viii
list of contributors
Joaqu í n Hor ta l Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Museo
Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), Madrid, Spain, and Azorean Biodiversity
Group - CITA A, Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Azores,
Angra do Heroísmo, Terceira, Açores, Portugal
W i l l i a m D. Hu m mon Department of Biological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens,
OH, USA
Dav i d G . Je n k i ns Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, Orlando,
FL, USA
D on n a be l l a C . L ac a p School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong,
Hong Kong SAR, China
E n r iqu e L a r a Institute of Biology, Laboratory of Soil Biology, University of
Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
F r a nc i s c o L a r a Departamento de Biología (Botánica), Facultad de Ciencias,
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
M ag g i e C .Y. L au School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong
Kong SAR, China
Ro g e r M a rc h a n t School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine,
Northern Ireland, UK
S a n dr a J. Mc I n n e s British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK
N ag or e G . M e di n a Departamento de Biología (Botánica), Facultad de Ciencias,
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
K i m A . M e dl e y Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL,
USA
E dwa r d A . D. M i t c h e l l Institute of Biology, Laboratory of Soil Biology, University
of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
S t e p h e n B . P oi n t i ng School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong,
Hong Kong SAR, China
H a n no S c h a e f e r Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Imperial College London,
Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, UK, and Organismic and Evolutionary Biology,
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
M a r t i n V. S ør e ns e n Natural History Museum of Denmark, Zoological Museum,
Copenhagen, Denmark
M . A n t on io Toda ro Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Modena and Reggio
Emilia, Modena, Italy
S i l k e W e r t h Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, WSL Swiss Federal Research
Institute, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
Dav i d M . W i l l i a m s Department of Botany, The Natural History Museum, London, UK
A l d o Zu l l i n i Dipartimento di Biotecnologie & Bioscienze, Università di MilanoBicocca, Milan, Italy
ix
Preface
This volume is derived from a symposium on ‘The importance of being small:€does
size matter in biogeography?’ organised during the first BioSyst meeting, which
was held in Leiden in August 2009. The idea for the symposium arose during an
informal discussion at the Natural History Museum in London. Biogeography
is now a well-established science with its own methods and tools, and a strong
theoretical framework. Many journals and books are dedicated to biogeography,
and specific meetings are organised by the International Biogeography Society.
Nevertheless, most of the ideas in biogeography come from empirical evidence
from macroscopic organisms, whereas the spatial patterns of microscopic organisms have mostly been neglected.
The aim of this book is to establish the importance of microorganisms in
�biogeography. In doing so, this book follows the stimulating discussion on the
so-called ‘Everything is everywhere’ hypothesis of the last decades. Currently,
enough empirical evidence is available on the biogeography and phylogeography
of many microscopic organisms and on larger organisms with microscopic dispersing stages; thus, this book brings together for the first time all this information
in a unifying framework, and discusses patterns, processes and consequences.
The coverage of the taxa is broad, spanning from prokaryotes to plants, fungi,
and animals; the approaches are rather different in the different chapters, and I
hope that readers will enjoy this book and find many inspirations for their own
research.
I am very grateful to the Systematics Association for the opportunity to organise the symposium in Leiden and especially to Juliet Brodie, Peter Olson, Dave
Roberts and Alan Warren for their support at an early stage of the organisation of
the meeting. Other people were very helpful during the meeting, and I am very
grateful to Peter Hovenkamp for his help in Leiden. As for any meeting, its success
was due to the high quality of the speakers, and I thank them all.
During the preparation of the book, I received strong support both from the
Systematics Association, William Baker, Richard Bateman and David Gower,
and€ from Cambridge University Press, Katrina Halliday, Dominic Lewis and
x
preface
Megan Waddington. The contributors made a great job in providing interesting,
stimulating and easily readable chapters on schedule, and I am very grateful to
them. They also provided valuable assistance during the reviewing process. Other
people read part of the book and provided comments and suggestions, and for that
I sincerely thank Tim Barraclough, Lars Hedenäs, Seraina Klopfstein, Petra Korall,
Marc-André Lachance, Ulrike Obertegger, Ibai Olariaga Ibarguren, Maureen
O’Malley, Albert Phillimore, Brett Riddle, Cuong Tang, Franco Verni, Martin
Westberg, Chris Wilson and others who prefer to remain anonymous.
Diego Fontaneto
Stockholm
Sweden
Part I
Theoretical framework
1
Why biogeography of microorganisms?
Diego Fontaneto1 and Juliet Brodie 2
╇ Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History,
Stockholm, Sweden; and Division of Biology, Imperial College London, Ascot, UK
2
╇ Department of Botany, The Natural History Museum, London, UK
1
1.1╇ The problem
The aim of this book is to discuss the idea that for microorganisms ‘Everything
is everywhere’ (EiE hypothesis), that is, large organisms have biogeographies,
whereas microscopic ones do not have any large-scale spatial pattern of distribution:€microorganisms have no biogeographies.
Size is known to be among the supreme regulators of all biological entities.
Shape of any organism is mostly a consequence of its size; how the organism interacts with the environment and all its biological functions are a matter of its size;
its life history is influenced by its size (Calder, 1996; Bonner, 2006). The strongest correlate of body size is that body volume and body surface are not linearly
related. Thus, larger organisms have different needs from small ones regarding
temperature, osmosis, physiology, metabolism and many (if not all) other pro�
cesses (Schmidt-Nielsen, 1984; Peters, 1986). Body size also determines what an
organism may be able to do, even its extinction risk, and the communities and
the ecosystems the organisms live and interact in (Colinvaux, 1978; Cardillo and
Bromhan, 2001; Hildrew et al., 2007).
Biogeography of Microscopic Organisms: Is Everything Small Everywhere?, ed. Diego Fontaneto.
Published by Cambridge University Press. © The Systematics Association 2011.
4
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Most of these theories, hypotheses and models attempt to describe some continuous function relating biological patterns and processes with body size, and
universal scaling laws in biology have been formulated and tested (Brown and
West, 2000). A notable exception to this is the biogeographic implication of body
size. Instead of a gradient in the patterns of diversity from large to small organisms,
an abrupt distinction has been hypothesised between large and small organisms,
with 2â•›m m being the empirical threshold value discriminating macroorganisms
with biogeography and microorganisms without biogeography (Finlay, 2002;
Fenchel and Finlay, 2004).
The underlying biological assumption for this abrupt threshold is that microorganisms are really different from macroscopic ones. The threshold dividing these
two groups of organisms should fall between 1 and 10â•›m m, with 2â•›m m being the
most probable size (Fig 1.1). The peculiar features of microorganisms allow them
to attain cosmopolitan distribution, an uncommon characteristic in most large
organisms:€ microorganisms are so small that they can be easily passively dispersed everywhere, they produce resting stages that allow them to survive adverse
conditions and to persist in any habitat (see Chapter 5 for a detailed report on the
effect of resting stages), and can use asexual or parthenogenetic reproduction to
quickly increase in number (Shön et al., 2009; see Chapter 15 for a detailed account
of the influence of body size, dispersal rate and abundance). However, the hypothesis that for microorganisms everything is everywhere (‘ubiquity hypothesis’) is
Fig 1.1 Hypothetical model of the transition between larger organisms with biogeography
and microscopic organisms without biogeography. Modified from Finlay (2002).
w h y b i o g eo g r a p h y o f m i c r o o r g a n i s m s?
controversial in the current scientific discussion, and in opposition to the ‘moderate endemicity model’ by Foissner (1999, 2006), which suggests that many microorganisms have restricted distributions (Chapter 5).
Why is the ubiquity hypothesis for microorganisms controversial? Why are scientists still arguing for or against it? Is there evidence supporting or contrasting
it? There are many issues in the EiE hypothesis that will continue to be unresolved
for a while. They include, for example, our current inability to reliably describe
diversity in microorganisms, to quantify the ecological niche and the geographic
range of most species, and to define their rates of dispersal. Moreover, knowing if
and how microorganisms attain global distributions is a far-reaching topic. For
example, is speciation happening also in the absence of geographic barriers isolating populations? What about environmental conservation? If microorganisms
are not linked to any geographic area, how can they be conserved? Here we introduce some of the problems of the biogeography of microorganisms, which will be
discussed later in more depth in different chapters.
1.2╇ Taxonomic units
The current formulations of EiE use morphology to define the taxonomic unit
under€ consideration (Fenchel and Finlay, 2006). Nevertheless, finding reliable
morphological taxonomic characters for most microorganisms is notoriously difficult; we need to define unambiguous units of diversity in order to map their distribution. Thus, many species considered cosmopolitan may represent species
complexes with restricted distributions. Almost all the chapters in the book discuss this topic, reviewing the current knowledge of species reality and identity in
each group, and€how new tools can help in providing reliable estimates of diversity.
On the one hand, molecular taxonomy helps morphological taxonomy to reveal
species complexes and potentially identify the correct units of diversity (e.g. Pons
et al., 2006; Burns et al., 2008); on the other hand, environmental sequencing by
cloning PCR products but mostly by ultrasequencing, is providing distributional
data of many taxa otherwise unrecorded or undistinguished (e.g. Robeson et al.,
2009; Creer et al., 2010).
1.3╇ Niche definition
The complete statement of the ubiquity hypothesis for microorganisms is that
‘everything is everywhere, but the environment selects’ (Baas Becking, 1934; de
Wit and Bouvier, 2006). Thus, knowledge of the ecological niche for these organisms (‘the environment selects’ part of the hypothesis) is needed in order to define
their distribution, and niche-based models are used for predicting biogeographic
5
6
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
distributions (see Chapter 15). But this is far from reality, because the identification of ecological needs for microorganisms may not be as straightforward as for
larger organisms. This is partly due to technical difficulties in measuring environmental parameters at the microscopic scale, but also to the fact that the presence
of microorganisms in an area does not mean that the environment is suitable. A
detailed example is given in Chapter 4, reporting on thermophilic bacteria in cool
soils. This aspect will not be improved by the recent advances in environmental
sequencing with ultrasequencing (e.g. Creer et al., 2010), as the results of such analyses will show species even in habitats where they do not live but where they are
only present as resting stages.
1.4╇ Spatial patterns
Reports on findings of species and species lists are the basis for any biogeographic analysis. For microorganisms we already know that there are many problems in identifying ‘species’ as units of diversity. In this case, new advances in
molecular tools will provide more reliable data on the geographic distribution of
microorganisms.
Nevertheless, following from the problem of defining ecological niches for
these organisms, it will also be difficult to disentangle the contribution of historical vs. ecological biogeography. The difference between historical and ecological
biogeography and the implications for the study of the distribution of microorganisms are explained in detail for protists in Chapter 6 (section 6.2):€large organisms usually have very small discrepancies between their potential, historically
derived biogeographic range and their realised, ecologically derived ranges,
whereas microorganisms, due to their resting stages, may be present in areas that
are not ecologically optimal for them (Chapter 4). The difference between historical and ecological biogeography highlights one of the major differences in dispersal between micro- and macroorganisms, and one of the difficulties in supporting
or falsifying the EiE hypothesis.
To further complicate the scenario, the various chapters on the biogeography of all the microorganisms report both evidence of large distributions
and of endemic, restricted distributions. Phylogeographic analyses, using DNA
sequences to investigate the spatial patterns of distribution are conveying similar results, providing evidence of both long-distance gene flow and restricted
gene flow.
Moreover, the spatial scale of the analysis, the measurement used (distance–
decay relationships, taxa–area relationships, local:global taxa richness), and other
potential confounding effects may become important when trying to infer the
processes driving the spatial patterns (Chapters 15–17).
w h y b i o g eo g r a p h y o f m i c r o o r g a n i s m s?
1.5╇ The challenge
To take up the challenge of the biogeography of microorganisms, this book brings
together empirical observations of the patterns in different groups of microscopic
organisms or with microscopic dispersing stages. Different approaches are used in
the description of diversity in order to support or not the hypothesis of cosmopolitanism for microorganisms. Moreover, the book goes a step further and �discusses
the processes and the generalities obtained from these examples. The main result
is that in all the groups, evidence of restricted distribution is more common than
generally accepted. Thus, the differences between micro- and macroorganisms
may not be so strong.
The book is divided into five main parts. The first part (Chapters 1 and 2) provides
a brief introduction and an historical and philosophical overview. The following
three parts deal with the empirical evidence gathered in different microorganisms,
from prokaryotes (Part II, Chapters 3 and 4), to unicellular eukaryotes (Part€ III,
Chapters 5–8), and pluricellular eukaryotes (Part IV, Chapters 9–14). Finally, the
last part focuses on the processes and the generalities in the biological properties of microorganisms (Chapters 15–17). The subdivision in different parts serves
more as a structure for the book than as a logical continuum. Each chapter can
be read alone, as it contains an overview of the problem, empirical evidence and
a discussion of the processes. The focus is different in different parts:€chapters in
Parts II–IV deal with taxon-based evidence and mechanisms, whereas the chapters in Part V are not taxon related, but more mechanism related. So, every chapter
presents its own view on the biogeography of microorganisms, providing a theoretical framework, explaining problems and suggesting ways to solve them.
Chapter 2 deals with an historical introduction of the origin of the hypothesis
that everything is everywhere, from the first studies at the beginning of the twentieth century; it provides a philosophical background for the hypothesis; it discusses the role of classification of taxa and areas, and then uses the diatoms as an
example.
Part II deals with the biogeography of the smallest of all living organisms,
prokaryotes. Chapter 3 provides a general review of the current knowledge of prokaryotic biogeography, discussing also problematic topics such as species concepts and identification in prokaryotes, and estimates of diversity. The following
chapter (Chapter 4) describes a specific example of thermophilic bacteria in cool
temperate areas. It provides also tests on the potential activity of these organisms
in a potentially unsuitable habitat and a discussion on mechanisms of transport
and the potential sources.
Part III deals with unicellular eukaryotes (protists and yeast); two of the
chapters provide general reviews using data from morphological taxonomy
7
8
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
(Chapter€5) and from phylogenetic and phylogeographic analyses (Chapter€6);
one reports on the example of testate amoebae (Chapter 7); and one on the
example of cactophilic yeast (Chapter 8). Chapter 5 starts by assuming that the
moderate endemicity model is a better explanation for the evidence, and then
pays attention to the reasons why certain species are cosmopolitan and others
are not. The most important factors described in Chapter 5 are resting cysts,
geological history and human introductions. The chapter provides a detailed
report of the biogeography of many species to support its initial assumptions.
Chapter 6 adopts a different approach dealing with the same organisms, freeliving protists. It reassesses the fundamental principles behind the EiE concept
in the light of recent findings and insights from twenty-first century molecular biology and microbial ecology. The chapter also discusses the implications
of species concepts and identification, estimates of diversity, evidence for biogeography and the differences between historical and ecological processes in
biogeography. Chapter 7 describes the example of Arcellinida testate amoebae,
providing evidence of restricted distributions and endemicity in a group of
flagship organisms:€ species so charismatic and easy to recognise, whose lack
of records in certain areas cannot be attributed to lack of research, but to their
actual absence. Chapter 8 deals with yeast, a group of fungi that adopted unicellular growth:€t hese organisms are thus included in the section on unicellular
eukaryotes. The yeast example in the chapter is a special one, as it lives in symbiosis with cacti. Thus, it provides a different approach to the problem, discussing the generalities and the peculiarities of the spatial patterns of the system.
Part IV contains six chapters dealing with the biogeography of microscopic
pluri�cellular organisms or of larger organisms with microscopic dispersing stages,
such as fungi (Chapter 9), lichens (Chapter 10), mosses (Chapter 11), ferns (Chapter
12) and animals (Chapters 13 and 14). Chapter 9 deals with genetic evidence of
�patterns of intercontinental gene flow in arctic-alpine and boreal-temperate
macroscopic fungi, which have single-celled microscopic dispersing spores.
Chapter 10 deals with the biogeography of lichens, providing evidence of wide,
disjunct and endemic distributions, focusing mostly on the fungus symbiont;
moreover, it reports the little evidence available at present for the biogeography of
the algal symbiont. Chapter 11 discusses the biogeography of mosses. These plants
are macroscopic, but they all have microscopic dispersing spores. As in the previous chapter, there are records of wide, disjunct and endemic distributions, and
of both spatially restricted and not-restricted gene flow. Chapter 12 takes a different approach, dealing with ferns. These plants also have microscopic dispersing
spores. The chapter deals with chorological and phylogeographic analyses, trying
to disentangle whether dispersal limitation or habitat quality shapes the distribution ranges of ferns. Chapter 13 focuses on microscopic animals, which have dormant stages that can act as dispersing propagules. It gathers empirical evidence on
a wide range of groups from a morphological perspective in species identification,
w h y b i o g eo g r a p h y o f m i c r o o r g a n i s m s?
showing that the biological peculiarities of the taxa are more important than size
alone. Chapter 14 deals with the same groups of microscopic animals, but using
recently published evidence from molecular taxonomy and phylogeography. The
results are qualitatively similar, with evidence of both widespread and restricted
distributions.
Part V has three chapters focusing on the processes and on the biological properties of microorganisms. Chapter 15 uses microorganisms to test the generalities of biogeographic principles. It deals with the effect of abundance, body size
and niche constraints on the spatial patterns of distribution. Chapter 16 provides
a metacommunity perspective, dealing with species sorting, mass effects, patch
dynamics and the neutral model. Chapter 17 analyses geographic gradients, suggesting that microorganisms may not be so different from macroscopic ones, and
provides a rationale for the use of microorganisms in what can be called ‘experimental biogeography’.
1.6╇ Conclusions
As a summary of the ideas expressed in the chapters of this book some main
�conclusions arise:€several distribution patterns are described and different pro�
cesses are hypothesised to explain them. Long-distance dispersal is evidently possible, but it is not the rule, as other distribution patterns can be explained by other
mechanisms, such as continental drift, stepping-stone migration and anthropogenic introduction.
The EiE hypothesis focuses on one single explanatory factor, dividing organisms into two main groups, larger organisms with biogeography and smaller ones
without biogeography. Given the complexity of the spatial patterns in microorganisms, it seems that their biogeography is more likely to depend on a complex
set of interacting phenomena, in which size is of course important, but it is not
the only driver. The differences between micro- and macroorganisms can thus be
included in a gradient, disregarding the hypothesised abrupt threshold assumed
by the EiE hypothesis.
References
Baas Becking, L.G.M. (1934). Geobiologie
of€inleiding tot de milieukunde.
The€Hague:€Van Stockum and
Zoon.
Bonner, J.T. (2006). Why Size Matters:€From
Bacteria to Blue Whales. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
Brown, J.H., West, G.B. (2000). Scaling
in Biology. New York, NY:€Oxford
University Press.
Burns, J.M., Janzen, D.H., Hajibabaei, M.,
Hallwachs, W., Hebert, P.D.N. (2008).
DNA barcodes and cryptic species
of skipper butterflies in the genus
9
10
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Perichares in Area de Conservacion
Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences USA
105, 6350–6355.
Calder, W.A. III (1996). Size, Function
and Life History. Mineola, NY:€Dover
Publications.
Cardillo, M., Bromhan, L. (2001). Body size
and risk of extinction in Australian
mammals. Conservation Biology 15,
1435–1440.
Colinvaux, P. (1978). Why Big Fierce
Animals are Rare. Princeton,
NJ:€Princeton University Press.
Creer, S., Fonseca, V.G., Porazinska, D.L.
et al. (2010). Ultrasequencing of the
meiofaunal biosphere:€practice, pitfalls
and promises. Molecular Ecology 19,
4–20.
De Wit, R., Bouvier, T. (2006). “Everything
is everywhere, but, the environment
selects”; what did Baas-Becking and
Beijerinck really say? Environmental
Microbiology 8, 755–758.
Fenchel, T., Finlay, B.J. (2004). The ubiquity
of small species:€patterns of local and
global diversity. BioScience 54, 777–784.
Fenchel, T., Finlay, B.J. (2006). The diversity
of microbes:€resurgence of the
phenotype. Philosophical Transactions
of the Royal Society B€– Biological
Sciences 361, 1965–1973.
Finlay, B.J. (2002). Global dispersal of freeliving microbial eukaryote species.
Science 296, 1061–1063.
Foissner, W. (1999). Protist
diversity:€estimates of the nearimponderable. Protist 150, 363–368.
Foissner, W. (2006). Biogeography and
dispersal of micro-organisms:€a
review emphasizing protists. Acta
Protozoologica 45, 111–136.
Hildrew, A.G., Raffaelli, D.G.,
Edmonds-Brown, R. (2007).
Body Size:€The Structure and
Function of Aquatic Ecosystems.
Cambridge:€Cambridge University
Press.
Peters, R.H. (1986). The Ecological
Implications of Body Size.
Cambridge Studies in Ecology.
Cambridge:€Cambridge University
Press.
Pons, J., Barraclough, T.G., Gomez-Zurita,€J.
et al. (2006). Sequence-based species
delimitation for the DNA taxonomy of
undescribed insects. Systematic Biology
55, 595–609.
Robeson, M.S. II, Costello, E.K., Freeman,
K.R. et al. (2009). Environmental DNA
sequencing primers for eutardigrades
and bdelloid rotifers. BMC Ecology 9, 25.
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984). Scaling:€Why
is Animal Size so Important?
Cambridge:€Cambridge University
Press.
Schön, I., Martens, K., Dijk, P. (Eds.)
(2009).€Lost Sex. The Evolutionary
Biology of Parthenogenesis.
Berlin:€Springer.
2
Historical biogeography, microbial
endemism and the role of classification:
everything is endemic
David M. Williams
Department of Botany, The Natural History Museum, London, UK
2.1╇ Introduction
Microbial biogeography, the study of the distribution of ‘small’ organisms, has
been said to have gained renewed vigour because of the recently resurrected
‘Everything is everywhere’ hypothesis (EiE) (Finlay, 2002; Fenchel and Finlay
2003; Finlay and Esteban, 2007). That hypothesis was concisely summarised by the
organisers of the conference on the biogeography of microorganisms in Leiden,
August 2009, in the promotional material:
This symposium is based around the hypothesis of everything-is-everywhere
(EiE) amongst small organisms. This hypothesis was proposed at the beginning of the twentieth century for microbial diversity and, about ten years ago,
extended to describe spatial patterns of diversity for any organism smaller
than two mm, under the simple observation that microscopic organisms such
as protists seem to be cosmopolitan, at least in habitats that support their
growth. Since its recent resurgence, this topic became hotly debated, with evidence apparently supporting and denying the hypothesis.
Biogeography of Microscopic Organisms: Is Everything Small Everywhere?, ed. Diego Fontaneto.
Published by Cambridge University Press. © The Systematics Association 2011.
12
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
The slogan ‘Everything is everywhere, [but] the environment selects’ has been
attributed to the microbiologist Lourens G.M. Baas Becking (Baas Becking, 1934).
The word ‘but’ is in brackets as sometimes the phrase appears as ‘Everything is
everywhere, the environment selects’ (e.g. Wilkinson, 2001), at other times as
‘Everything is everywhere, and the environment selects’ (e.g. Kuehne et al., 2007,
my italics). According to de Wit and Bouvier (2006), the original Dutch€– ‘Alles is
overal:€maar het milieu selecteert’ (Baas Becking, 1934)€– translates as ‘Everything
is everywhere, but the environment selects’ (e.g. Heino et al., 2010). Either way it
does not seem to matter too much as the core idea(s) remain the same (it might be
thought that the word ‘but’ in the original adds a little more precision connecting
the two ideas together and that subsequent versions that either omit the word or
substitute the word ‘and’ are merely mistaken).
Credit for the origin of this hypothesis€– or pair of hypotheses€– goes to Martinus
Willem Beijerinck (1851–1931), a Dutch biologist (for a brief biography, see Chung
and Ferris, 1996), as well as Baas Becking (1895–1963), with Baas Becking elaborating on an original comment from Beijerinck that was understood to be a general
hypothesis explaining the geographic distribution, or lack thereof, in microorganisms with the notion that because microorganisms can get just about anywhere
on the planet then they should indeed be everywhere, and the reason they are not
is that they are susceptible to different environmental pressures (for biographical
details on Baas Becking, see Ferguson Wood, 1963 and Quispel, 1998; for a bibliography, see Westenberg, 1977). The hypothesis might be summarised as meaning
that ecological processes are the primary drivers of microbial diversity, there is
no ‘true’ endemicity (in the sense of any taxon being confined to just one region
of the globe) and historical factors are either negligible or irrelevant€– ‘Beijerinck
… declared that ‘everything is everywhere; the environment selects’, and microbiologists have assumed since then that there is no such discipline as microbial
biogeography’ (Fitter, 2005, p. R187).
Rather than examine the propositions within the hypothesis for possible empirical content, I offer a short digression on the nature of the hypothesis, as formulated in the phrase:€‘Everything is everywhere, but the environment selects’.
2.2╇ Distributional hypotheses
As noted above, the hypothesis appears to be composed of two parts. The first
is ‘Everything is everywhere’, that microorganisms are ubiquitous:€ ‘According
to advocates of the ubiquity hypothesis … the vast population sizes of microorganisms drive ubiquitous dispersal … and make local extinction virtually
impossible€…â•›. Geographic isolation is therefore absent and as a result, allopatric
speciation should be rare or nonexistent, which would explain the perceived low
global morphospecies diversity of microbial eukaryotes …’ (Vanormelingen et al.,
h i s t o r i c a l b i o g e o g r a p h y : € e v e r y t h i n g i s e n d e m i c
2008, p. 394). The notion that there are ‘vast population sizes of microorganisms …’
is for the most part derived from another notion, that endemicity in microorganisms is scarce, rather than an empirical reality. Still, regardless of detail or explanation, the phrase ‘Everything is everywhere’ is clearly false, and in any case, one
would need to know in what sense the words ‘everything’ and ‘everywhere’ are
intended. As soon as something is not found everywhere then everything (obviously) is not everywhere. This much could be easily agreed upon.
The second part, ‘the environment selects’, is designed to protect the first from
failing because as everything is clearly not everywhere (‘Tom Fenchel and Bland
Finlay seem determined to perpetuate the myth of ubiquity despite all evidence to
the contrary’, Lachance, 2004), it is because ‘the environment selects’. The structure of the slogan is such that the first part can never be found to be conclusively
false as the second part protects that from ever happening, should any particular organism be discovered not to be everywhere. In its original formulation, one
would have been expected to confirm the fact that ‘Everything is everywhere’ by
experimental manipulation to discover which particular ‘environment selects’.
Thus, one might encounter an organism in one place, culture it and then demonstrate that it can, indeed, exist anywhere. But that is no different from observing,
for example, a giraffe in London Zoo and as it survives in what would be rather
awful conditions relative to its natural environment means giraffes should really
be everywhere. This is the key:€natural environments and migration. In any case,
EiE is neither a theory nor a hypothesis. What is it then?
Maureen O’Malley (2008), in her paper on the history of microbial biogeography,
has called the phrase ‘Everything is everywhere, but the environment selects’ ‘a
tidy axiom’:
This tidy axiom, often, cited by microbiologists as attributable to Beijerinck due
to Baas Becking’s self effacing presentation of it … (O’Malley, 2008, p. 320,
but see O’Malley, 2007, p. 651).
An axiom is a self-evident truth, something that can be taken for granted. The
word I used above was slogan, defined in this instance as:
Something that serves perhaps more as a social expression of unified purpose,
rather than a projection for an intended audience (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Slogan)
So, if the central, self-evident truth is obscure, wrong or misleading, then what is
it that is being investigated?
2.3╇ Geobiology
Baas Becking’s ideas€– ‘the law of Beijerinck’ (Jacobs, 1984, p. 205); ‘Beijerinck’s
laws’ (Baas Becking, 1959, p. 48)€ – were given serious consideration in the
13
14
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
context of the developing evolutionary theories in Europe in the 1930s, prior
to the€�establishment of the modern synthesis (Mayr and Provine, 1980).
Beijerinck’s laws were discussed within a rich constellation of ideas relating to
biogeography, most of which have sadly faded into obscurity (for example, see
Lam, 1938, p. 84). In 1934 Baas Becking published a book entitled Geobiologie of
inleiding tot de milieukunde (Baas Becking, 1934; I have not been able to examine a copy). A section has been translated in Anton Quispel’s biographical study
of Baas Becking:
These lectures are an effort to describe the relation between the organisms
and the earth. The name ‘Geobiology’ merely expresses this relation. This new
word does not want to describe a new discipline. It tries to unite under one
point of view, as far as possible, phenomena which already were known in different areas of biology (Quispel, 1998, p. 70).
Baas Becking, then, was interested in the prospect of unifying ‘the relation
between the organisms and the earth’. Since then geobiology has arisen in a variety of other forms. Koch suggested this version:
Following the idea of Good (1947), who termed the combination of phytogeography and plant ecology as geobotany, a similar combination of biogeography
and ecology can logically be known as ‘geobiology’ (Koch, 1957, p. 145).
Sylvester-Bradley suggested this version:
Does it [geobiology] differ at all, except in name, from the venerable science
of palaeontology, a science far older than geology? (Sylvester-Bradley, 1972,
p. 110).
Geobiology has now become a discipline:€‘Geobiology is that unifying discipline
that seeks to span and link the geological and biological sciences’ (Liebermann,
2005, p. 23). There is a journal called Geobiology, which began in 2003 (seven
volumes published so far; the editorial for the journal’s launch referred to Baas
Becking’s 1934 book; Geobiology 1, p. 1); and there is a book series entitled Topics
in Geobiology (with over 30 items published so far).
Even so, what emerges from these varied efforts to define a new discipline is the
study of geography and its relevance to species distributions (biology, ecology),
past and present (palaeontology and neontology), and their explanation€– a subject usually referred to as biogeography.
2.4╇ Geography and species
The history of civilisation is a history of wandering, sword in hand, in search
of food. In the misty younger world we catch glimpses of phantom races, rising, slaying, finding food, building rude civilisations, decaying, falling under the
swords of stronger hands, and passing utterly away. Man, like any other animal,
h i s t o r i c a l b i o g e o g r a p h y : € e v e r y t h i n g i s e n d e m i c
has roved over the earth seeking what he might devour; and not romance and
adventure, but the hunger-need, has urged him on his vast adventures (Jack
London, 1917).
The concept of evolution, the idea that some species might give rise to other, new
species, was on the minds of men some time before Charles Darwin proposed his
own particular theory as to their origin (Bowler, 2009). Darwin began his On the
Origin of Species with these words:
When on board H.M.S. Beagle, as naturalist, I was much struck with certain
facts in the distribution of the inhabitants of South America, and in the geological relations of the present to the past inhabitants of that continent. These
facts seemed to me to throw some light on the origin of species€— that mystery
of mysteries, as it has been called by one of our greatest philosophers (Darwin,
1859).
Darwin’s inspiration came from two sources:€biogeography€– ‘the distribution of
the inhabitants of South America …’€– and history€– ‘… the geological relations of
the present to the past inhabitants of that continent’.
By a remarkable coincidence, Alfred Russel Wallace€– a professional plant collector, working in the tropics of South East Asia€– hit upon more-or-less the same
theory of species origin as Darwin (Raby, 2002). He communicated his ideas directly to Darwin in a letter from Ternate, Eastern Indonesia. Wallace’s essay was
published in 1858 as On the Tendency of Varieties to Depart Indefinitely from the
Original Type (Darwin and Wallace, 1858; Darwin contributed a few items to the
presentation but had no input into Wallace’s title essay). Wallace’s communication
has great significance, as it helped inspire Darwin to complete what he called the
‘abstract’ of his theory, the book that became On the Origin of Species.
As Darwin and Wallace both understood, it was not really possible to grasp the
concept of the evolution of organisms without some understanding, appreciation
and explanation of their geographic distribution (McCarthy, 2009). Viewed from
this perspective€– and with the benefit of hindsight€– it may not be quite so surprising that Darwin and Wallace quickly came to view species as mutable entities
(Wallace before Darwin), as both were struck by what they saw in the regions they
visited (Desmond and Moore, 1991; Shermer, 2002). In a general sense, the marriage of geography and history established evolution as both a viable concept and
tractable research programme.
Further commentary from Darwin is relevant:
We are thus brought to the question which has been largely discussed by natur�
alists, namely, whether species have been created at one or more points of
the earth’s surface … undoubtedly there are many cases of extreme difficulty
in understanding how the same species could possibly have migrated from
some one point to the several distant and isolated points, where now found.
Nevertheless the simplicity of the view that each species was first produced
15
16
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
within a single region captivates the mind. He who rejects it, rejects the vera
causa of ordinary generation with subsequent migration, and calls in the agency
of a miracle (Darwin, 1859).
If organisms have but one point of origin, what is essential to Darwin’s argument
is the need for species to migrate from one place to the next, constantly travelling from their point of origin, to achieve any kind of wider distribution:€‘ordinary generation with subsequent migration’. Migration of organisms to other
places was, of course, well known at the time but Darwin saw it necessary to
extend the reasoning to all organisms that were considered widespread. That
migration was later graphically captured by Ernst Haeckel in his map of wandering humans, which first appeared in the second edition of his Natürliche
Schöpfungsgeschichte (1870, translated into English as The History of Creation,
Haeckel, 1876) and represented in American literature by Jack London (see epigraph above), a convinced Darwinian (‘As a boy, the first heroes that I put into
my Pantheon were Napoleon and Alexander the Great. Later on I destroyed this
Pantheon and built a new Pantheon in which I began inscribing names such
as David Starr Jordan, as Herbert Spencer, as Huxley, as Darwin, as Tyndall’,
letter dated 7 September 1915). Nearly 150 years after Haeckel, similar images
still appear, depicting almost the same routes that humans supposedly took
to get to where they are today (Kohn, 2006; Shreeve, 2006; but on humans and
their biogeography see Grehan and Schwartz, 2009 for a plausible alternative;
for migration, see Haywood, 2008:€‘Migration is one of the defining features of
the human race’). Of course, if humans travelled, well then, so the argument
goes, everything else must have. Diatoms and other algae obviously could not all
travel under their own steam, so how? Many suggestions, for algae at least, have
been made:€ducks (Atkinson, 1970), birds (Atkinson, 1972), swan faeces (Luther,
1963), ‘small aquatic organisms’ (Maguire, 1963), aquatic beetles (Milliger and
Schlichting, 1968), waterbirds (Proctor, 1959), waterfowl (Schlichting, 1960), the
Gizzard Shad, Dorosoma cepedianum (Velasques, 1940), and so on€ – the list is
exhausted only by the extent of one’s imagination.
Darwin noted ‘that each species was first produced within a single region captivates the mind. He who rejects it, rejects the vera causa of ordinary generation
with subsequent migration, and calls in the agency of a miracle’. Of course, quite
unknown to Darwin at that time was the possibility that€– as if by miracle€– the
earth moved. The discovery of plate tectonics and the ever-shifting nature of
the€earth’s crust did indeed confirm that even though organisms move€– so does
the earth (McCarthy, 2009). Thus migration might indeed captivate the mind but it
need not be the sole cause of organism distribution.
The notion of wandering organisms, migrating to a better place, seems to have
first arisen from the biblical story of Noah’s Ark (Nelson, 1978) but retains a certain significance for dispersalist biogeography, the view that the primary agency
h i s t o r i c a l b i o g e o g r a p h y : € e v e r y t h i n g i s e n d e m i c
in species distribution is their ability to disperse, to travel around the globe. As
Moore wrote, ‘Evidently organisms possessed adaptive flexibility. They could
fly, swim, walk, crawl, or hitchhike to pastures new and still survive. The story
of Noah’s descent from Ararat contained this truth at least:€ migration occurred’
(Moore, 2005, p. 126), and in the context of the development of the science of biogeography, O’Malley added:
The victory of the dispersalist school of macrobiogeography after Darwin contributed to the acceptance of Beijerinck’s special rule about microbial distribution. A common ground of dispersal placed exceptional ubiquity within a
broader framework that joined macrobial and microbial biogeography into a
continuum of distribution (O’Malley, 2008, p. 318).
O’Malley also noted that ‘environmentally determined ubiquity became a law of
microbiology in part because of how well it fit the dispersalism of macrobiogeography, and in part because it fit the standardisation of laboratory practice and the
prevailing ideas of ‘good science’’ (O’Malley, 2008, p. 319); good science, as then
understood, was the experimental, such as the manipulation of environments in
a laboratory.
If the EiE hypothesis is simply a slogan or an axiom found to be false, and, like
much biogeography, has its basis in the biblical dispersalist approach, then what
future is there for microbial biogeography? If we discard the slogan, the axiom and
the dispersalist view, then there are organisms and continents (areas), without
the assumption of either wandering organisms or continents but mindful of the
fact that both do so. Relevant is historical biogeography, or more accurately comparative biogeography, which subsumes any notion of geobiology (Parenti and
Ebach, 2009). Comparative biogeography addresses problems of classification,
the classification of organisms and the classification of areas, a view captured by
Parenti and Ebach’s title:€Comparative Biogeography:€Discovering and Classifying
Biogeographic Patterns of a Dynamic Earth.
2.5╇ Classification
Classification concerns the relationships of taxa (organisms) and areas (the places
taxa occupy). Classifications are best expressed in hierarchical schemes, familiar
to all biologists, where organisms are placed in classes, orders, families and genera, each less general than its preceding category.
Biogeographic classification is less definitive. There have been many different
competing schemes, such as the biogeographic regions created by Wallace (1876),
which have themselves been subdivided. Thus, to a certain extent, biogeographic
classification is also understood to be hierarchical. But what groups to recognise,
what groups have reality?
17
18
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Progress in taxon classification identifies three possible groups for organisms:€monophyletic, paraphyletic and polyphyletic groups. Such groups relate to
both characters and ancestry. The only groups with any reality are monophyletic
groups. Monophyletic groups are discovered by shared derived characters, synapomorphies, homologies; monophyletic groups can be explained by the fact that
they relate most closely among themselves. Neither para- nor polyphyletic groups
have unique ancestors or unique characters. The same notion can be applied to
geographic areas, with the presence of shared taxa acting as synapomorphies.
2.5.1╇ Taxa
Consider the recent paper of Caron et al. (2009) entitled ‘Protists are microbes
too:€a perspective’ (see also Caron, 2009). What does the title mean? For a definition of microbes the authors offer the following:
Strictly speaking, microorganisms are defined by their size; that is, organisms
that are smaller than can be resolved with the naked eye …. If we define
microbes by cell size, then most protists qualify as microbes. A few single cells
and numerous colonial forms exist that are visible to the unaided eye, but the
vast majority are microscopic. Similarly, most bacteria and archaea are indeed
microscopic, but there are exceptions here as well. In fact, a very large number of protistan taxa are much smaller than the largest bacteria (Caron et al.,
2009, p. 6).
Is size a character, in the sense that every organism so measured and of the same or
similar size could have that factor considered homologous, the attributes required
for natural groups of organisms? No. And in any case, groups of organisms do not
gain reality by being defined, as is obvious from Caron et al.’s own text. Definition
isn’t discovery€– it is imposition. It is clear Caron et al. appreciate this difference but
their purpose is to create an argument to support future study of protists (a different
argument is offered by O’Malley and Dupré, 2007a, 2007b, but for roughly the same
cause). Regardless of however noble the purpose, microbes do not exist in any evolutionary (or even biological) sense€– they did not come into being, they will not go
extinct:€t hey can’t be anywhere, or do anything. Interestingly, and given the thrust
of the authors’ intent (to show that many protists are ‘microbes’, that is:€small), the
same reasoning applies to protists, inasmuch as it too is an artificial (non-existent)
group (Schlegel and Hülsmann, 2007). Inspection of any tree of relationships for
eukaryote organisms reveals protists to be defined only by creating the group after
excluding all plants, animals and fungi. Protists are those organisms left behind
after the excision of these three monophyletic groups, a classic case of a paraphyletic group, a group named by convention (definition) rather than discovered by
evidence. Thus, to study any taxon in a biological (phylogenetic) context, there is a
need for it to be demonstrably monophyletic (evidence derived from characters),
such as diatoms, the group I study, their size being completely irrelevant to that
h i s t o r i c a l b i o g e o g r a p h y : € e v e r y t h i n g i s e n d e m i c
discovery or their distribution. For the purposes of biogeographic study, it is only
their distribution that matters.
2.5.2╇ Areas
Every study of a taxon’s geographic distribution relates to the concept of endemism,
regardless of the organism concerned or the extent of its distribution. Endemism
depicts the area(s) that any particular organism lives in and lives nowhere else.
The absolute area of endemism is the earth itself, notwithstanding the promise of astrobiogeography. Other areas of endemism are smaller, such as islands
(Madagascar, the Isle of Man), continents (Australia) or even a river basin (Angara
River, Lake Baikal).
There have been a number of schemes describing different kinds of endemism.
One is that of Myers and de Grave (2000). I am not advocating Myers and de Grave’s
scheme here (although it is an interesting approach) but use it to demonstrate that
the problem of taxon distribution can and has been looked at from the point of
view of varying kinds of endemism. Myers and de Grave name different kinds of
distributions. Holoendemic indicates global distribution which they define as having ‘unlimited biogeography’€– cosmopolitan, in other words; euryendemic represents broadly conjunct distributions, which have more or less (broad) continuous
or contiguous distribution; stenoendemic represents conjunct distributions,
which are restricted but continuous; and finally, rhoendemic represents disjunct
distributions where the same organism occupies different and separate areas of
the globe. Thus, the distributional range of every organism can be expressed as a
factor of their endemism (Myers and de Grave, 2000).
No two taxa occur in exactly the same areas on the globe but some will coincide
enough to suggest that they occupy a natural region of the globe. In this respect,
‘An area of endemism is a geographical unit inferred from the combined distributions of endemic taxa’ (Ebach et al., 2008). These natural areas are like natural
taxa, hypotheses concerning the relationships of particular areas, one to another.
Systems of naming natural regions of the planet have been in place for a long
time:€categories are provinces, dominions, regions and realms (much like taxon
categories:€ classes, orders, families and genera), with the further possibility of
sub-districts, sub-provinces, sub-dominions, sub-regions, and sub-realms (Ebach
et al., 2008), each category related in a hierarchical fashion as in taxonomic names
(see, for example, Udvardy, 1975; for review and commentary on biogeographic
classification, see Nelson and Platnick, 1981, Chapter 6; Nelson, 1983; Williams,
2007; Williams and Ebach, 2007; Parenti and Ebach, 2009).
Various systems have been proposed for classifying areas (e.g. Amorim, 1992)
and recently the first International Code of Area Nomenclature was published
(Ebach et al., 2008, for commentary see Zaragüeta-Bagils et al., 2009; Parenti et al.,
2009; and López et al., 2008 for an example of its use).
19
20
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Thus, correspondence of taxa and areas is the focus for problems in
biogeography.
2.6╇ Biogeography and evolution in diatoms
Darwin made some comments concerning diatoms and their distribution in the
first edition of his journal of the voyage of the HMS Beagle (1839). In a footnote he
remarked on Christian Gottfried Ehrenberg’s (1845) study of the face paint used by
the local people in Tierra del Fuego:
This substance, when dry, is tolerably compact, and of little specific gravity:€ Professor Ehrenberg has examined it:€ he states … that it is composed
of infusoria [which included diatoms] … He says that they are all inhabitants
of fresh-water; this is a beautiful example of the results obtainable through
Professor Ehrenberg’s microscopic researches … (Darwin, 1839, p. 127,
footnote).
Darwin then delivers not more facts but two opinions:
It is, moreover, a striking fact that in the geographical distribution of the infusoria, which are well known to have very wide ranges, that all the species in this
substance, although brought from the extreme southern point of Tierra del
Fuego, are old, known forms (Darwin, 1839, p. 127, footnote).
The first opinion is that ‘… the geographical distribution of the infusoria … are well
known to have very wide ranges’; the second is that ‘… all the species in this substance, although brought from the extreme southern point of Tierra del Fuego, are
old, known forms’.
Darwin suggests that diatoms have very wide geographic ranges and, because
these are old known forms, diatom distributions are very old. It would be overstating the case to suggest that Darwin had any direct influence on subsequent
interpretations of diatom distributions from that point on but his viewpoint was
topical (further commentary on Darwin and Ehrenberg is in Jardine, 2009). Here
it is worth a digression to note Ehrenberg’s ideas on distribution, as it was he who
had studied the diatomite used as face paint.
Ehrenberg found a total of 18 species in the Tierra del Fuego face paint, of which
11 were diatoms (Ehrenberg, 1845). When he published the Mikrogeologie in 1854,
the total number of species was reduced to 17, of which only eight were diatoms
(Fig 2.1, from Ehrenberg, 1854; the table includes the 8 diatom species€– numbered
2–9). Of these eight species, three are actually confined to parts of South America,
according to Ehrenberg (Fig 2.2, from Ehrenberg, 1854, pl. 35, fig V, illustrations of
organisms from Tierra del Fuego, diatoms numbered 2–9). Darwin’s assumption
that they were known forms is correct€– but they were known and described by
Ehrenberg from restricted parts of the world. In other words, Ehrenberg had seen
h i s t o r i c a l b i o g e o g r a p h y : € e v e r y t h i n g i s e n d e m i c
Fig 2.1 Reproduced from Ehrenberg’s Mikrogeologie (Ehrenberg, 1854), a list of
organisms found in Tierra del Fuego (17 species, eight are diatoms, numbered 2–9).
Fig 2.2 Reproduced from Ehrenberg’s Mikrogeologie (Ehrenberg, 1854, pl. 35, fig. V),
illustrations of organisms listed in Fig 2.1 from Tierra del Fuego, diatoms numbered 2–9.
Of the eight diatom species, three are actually confined to parts of South America.
21
22
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
the usual mix one encounters in any flora, diatom or otherwise€– some species are
widespread, some not.
Earlier Ehrenberg made some general comments on distribution, first published
in 1849:
… the Rocky Mountains are a more powerful barrier between the two sides
of America, than the Pacific Ocean between America and China; the infusorial forms of Oregon and California being wholly different from those of the
east side of the mountains, while they are partly identical with Siberian species’ (Ehrenberg 1850, modified and translated from the original German in
Ehrenberg, 1849).
Ehrenberg understood that a relationship of some kind existed between the diatoms from both coasts of the Pacific Ocean, even if he could only explain it by coincidence (O’Malley, 2008).
Ehrenberg offered some potential examples. The freshwater genus Tetracyclus is
primarily composed of extinct species (Williams, 1996). At present there are some
40–45 species, of which only four or five are still living. Ehrenberg first named and
described the genus in 1843 with the name Biblarium but because of the principle
of nomenclatural priority Tetracyclus, a name used by William Smith in 1843 for a
living representative, is the correct name (Williams, 1986). Ehrenberg described
species from two fossil deposits€– one from Oregon, USA, the other from Barguzin,
Siberia. Ehrenberg noted that some species occurred only in the Siberian deposit,
others only in the Oregon deposit, and a few from both. Even though subsequent
studies have revised the taxonomy and distributional limits, Ehrenberg’s interpretation remains the same today. Extinct species of Tetracyclus are mostly found
in the continental areas surrounding the Pacific Ocean:€in China, Siberia, Japan
and, rather strangely€– and possibly by a species that still survives€– in Java; and on
the opposite coast in the USA (Oregon and California), British Columbia, Mexico€–
and possibly by a species that still survives€– in Chile.
The primary interest in this example was not so much to try and explain the
distribution of species of Tetracyclus€– a remarkable number of other plants and
animals show the same kind of trans-Pacific divide (Humphries and Parenti,
1999)€ – but to encourage the search for more diatom taxa that reflect the same
or similar kinds of distribution patterns. Lake Baikal, the source of Ehrenberg’s
Siberian fossils, seemed an obvious place to look.
The benthic diatoms in the flora of Lake Baikal are remarkable for the sheer
quantity of endemic taxa present. The number and diversity was recognised early
in the twentieth century, by two Russian scientists Boris Skvortzov and Konstantin
I. Meyer (Skvortzov and Meyer, 1928; Meyer, 1930; Skvortzov, 1937; see Williams
and Reid, 2001). Skvortzov’s and Meyer’s studies were based on material collected
in the early 1900s. Skvortzov noted the total number of diatoms at around 300,
with roughly half (148) endemic to the lake.
h i s t o r i c a l b i o g e o g r a p h y : € e v e r y t h i n g i s e n d e m i c
Recent estimates of Lake Baikal’s diversity suggest that there are in excess of 500
taxa, with about 200–250 endemic (Flower, personal communication). It is a major
task to document a flora as diverse as that encountered in Lake Baikal. Thus, species that may yield data of interest relative to the origin of the flora, for example,
are best tackled first. Such species are those that have varying geographic distributions. While Lake Baikal harbours only two living species of Tetracyclus (fossil
material is also available, with more species; Williams, 2004; Williams et al., 2006),
another species, Eunotia clevei, was of greater significance for three reasons:€(1)
It had previously been considered a widespread, cold-water species, found only
in deep lakes; (2) although it was classified as a species of Eunotia, it was clearly
different from the more typical kind; and (3) Skvortzov had previously published
descriptions and illustrations of three conspicuous Lake Baikal endemics, all evidently related to Eunotia clevei, as he named two as varieties (Williams and Reid,
2006a):€Eunotia clevei var. hispida, distinguished by prominent valve spines, and
Eunotia clevei var. baicalensis; the third taxon he called Eunotia lacusbaicalii was
distinguished by the parallel sides of its valves and its disorganised valve surface
but evidently also related to Eunotia clevei.
Later, another Russian diatomist, Alexander Pavlovich Skabichevsky (Skabi�
chevskaya and Strelnikova, 2003; Skabichevskaya et al., 2004) also published on
Eunotia clevei var. baicalensis (Skabichevsky, 1977). He changed its taxonomic
rank from the rather ill-defined category of variety to subspecies. Subspecies
were understood to depart from the type in some geographic and morphological
dimension, departing from Eunotia clevei as it is normally recognised.
Many characters were evident that separated Eunotia clevei and its endemic
varieties from other species in the genus Eunotia, enough to place them all in a
separate genus, named Amphorotia (Williams and Reid, 2006a). Among the species in Amphorotia, five are recognised as endemic to Lake Baikal:€ Amphorotia
lacusbaikalii, A. baicalensis, A. hispida, A. lineare and A. lunata. Amphorotia
hispida has large bifurcating spines, said to be characteristic of this species,
although a similar type of spine is found on A. clevei. The common possession
of spines provides evidence for their close relationship, remembering that hispida is endemic to Baikal while clevei occurs across the Boreal in deep cold-water
lakes€– Lake Ladoga, Lake Onega and a few other places. However, a number of
other specimens were discovered in various museum collections that were either
only partly described, buried and forgotten in the literature or had been identified as something completely unrelated. For example, some specimens from the
Mekong River delta in Vietnam remained undescribed until they were placed in
Amphorotia as A. mekonensis (Williams and Reid, 2006a); other specimens, first
called Eunotia clevei var. asiatica, which occur in South China, and possibly marine, are now known as Amphorotia asiatica; the taxon first named Eunotia clevei
var. sinica by Skvortzov, is now recognised as Amphorotia sinica (Williams and
23
24
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Reid, 2006a). From a geographic point of view, the living species have two relationships, one a Northern cold-water, Boreal range, the other south towards the
more tropical€parts of Asia. Consideration of the fossils adds another dimension.
These occur€– from various deposits€– in the USA, Japan and China, and are probably interrelated among themselves, but all located around the Pacific Ocean.
Thus a third trans-Pacific relationship appears related to the South East Asian
�living group. Remarkably, the trans-Pacific relationship mirrors that of the fossils
from the genus Tetracyclus (Williams, 1996) discussed above (Williams and Reid,
2006a).
Further, the genus Colliculoamphora, also recently described, has several species occurring either side of the Pacific Ocean as well as either side of the Isthmus
of Panama (Williams and Reid, 2006b, 2009); Colliculoamphora is closely related
to Amphorotia (it belongs in the same family) but unlike the remaining members of that group is wholly marine. The genus Eunophora, also closely related to
Fig 2.3 Map of the world, orientated at the Pacific Ocean, showing the distributions of
species around the Pacific Ocean margin:€Solid black line:€Amphorotia (A, Amphorotia
baikalensis); black dotted lines:€Tetracyclus (B, Tetracyclus tschermissionvae) and fossil
Amphorotia (E, Amphorotia asiatica); grey lines:€Colliculoamphora (C, Colliculoamphora
reichardtiana, D,€Colliculoamphora reedii); hatched line:€Eunophora (not illustrated).
h i s t o r i c a l b i o g e o g r a p h y : € e v e r y t h i n g i s e n d e m i c
Amphorotia and Colliculoamphora, occurs in Australia and New Zealand. From
the South American perspective, there are many species and genera of significance, Peronotia, for example (but see Mezeltin and Lange-Bertalot, 2007, for an
extensive, illustrated document of the diversity within Eunotia, and Kociolek et€a l.,
2001 for Actinella).
In summary, a picture is beginning to emerge with respect to this family of diatoms that centres on the Pacific Ocean and the southern hemisphere (Fig 2.3). It
does not, however, ‘stress the importance of dispersal and migration in structuring diatom communities at regional to global scales’ (Vyverman et al., 2007), even
if ‘microbes that adhere to Saharan dust can live for centuries and easily survive
transport across the Atlantic’ (Gorbushina et al., 2007, p. 2911; see also Campbell
Smith in Bannermann, 1922; Kellogg and Griffin, 2006), any more than it suggests
complex and ancient vicariance processes acting on immobile organisms. What
is emerging is a common pattern of disjunction, centred on the Pacific and, while
complex, remains a puzzle.
One might speculate that an ancient pattern has been preserved simply because
more recent Quaternary changes (from 1.8 million years to 2.6 million years ago) would
not affect species already extinct. Nevertheless, it is natural to assume more evidence
will elucidate. Yet even at this stage, it seems that geological, rather than ecological,
changes have played a major part in establishing diatom patterns of distribution.
2.7╇ Conclusions
To study geographic distributions, general patterns are required€ – or at least to
search for them rather than assuming they do not exist. So what does endemicity mean in microorganisms? About as much as it does with any other organism:€ every study of geographic distribution relates to the concept of endemism,
and even if areas of endemism are of varying sizes, they may relate to earth history
rather than the ability of organisms to wander. Size, shape and dispersal abilities
of any organism are irrelevant to the study of its geographic dimension. The slogan (axiom) ‘Everything is everywhere’ is simply false:€‘Everything is endemic’ is a
more meaningful starting point, a more meaningful axiom, if you wish.
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Diego Fontaneto for his kind invitation to speak at the EiE symposium in Leiden, Holland, and to Juliet Brodie and Maureen O’Malley for useful
comments on an earlier draft of this paper. The presentation in Leiden was dedicated to Chris Humphries (1947–2009), as is this written version. I only hope he
would have approved of its content.
25
26
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
References
Amorim, D.d.S. (1992). An empirical
system of ranking of biological
classifications using biogeographical
components. Revista brasileira de
Entomologia 36, 281–292.
Atkinson, K.M. (1970). Dispersal of
phytoplankton by ducks. Wildfowl 21,
110–111.
Atkinson, K.M. (1972). Birds as
transporters of algae. British
Phycological Journal 7, 319–321.
Baas Becking, L.G.M. (1934). Geobiologie
of inleiding tot de milieukunde.
The€Hague:€Van Stockum and
Zoon.
Baas Becking, L.G.M. (1959). Geology and
microbiology. Information Series New
Zealand, Department for Scientific
and Industrial Research, no. 22 [New
Zealand Oceanographic Institute
Memoir no. 3, Contributions to Marine
Microbiology], pp. 48–64.
Bowler, P.J. (2009). Evolution:€The History
of an Idea. 4th edition. Berkeley,
CA:€University of California Press.
Campbell Smith, W. (1922). Note on a fall of
dust, “Blood-rain”, at Gran Canaria, 8th
to 11th February 1920. In Bannerman,
D.A. (ed.), The Canary Islands:€Their
History, Natural History and Scenery,
pp. 321–327. London:€Gurney and
Jackson.
Caron, D.A. (2009). Protistan
biogeography:€why all the fuss?
Journal of Eukaryote Microbiology 56,
105–112.
Caron, D.A., Worden, A.Z., Countway,
P.D., Demir, E., Heidelberg, K.B.
(2009). Protists are microbes too:€a
perspective. ISME [International
Society for Microbial Ecology] Journal
3, 4–12.
Chung, K.-T., Ferris, D.H. (1996). Martinus
Willem Beijerinck (1851–1931),
Pioneer of general microbiology. ASM
[American Society for Microbiology]
News 62, 539–543.
Darwin, C.D. (1839). Journal of Researches
into the Natural History and Geology of
the Countries visited during the Voyage
of H.M.S. Beagle round the World.
London:€John Murray.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species
by Means of Natural Selection, or, the
Preservation of Favoured Races in the
Struggle for Life. London:€John Murray.
Darwin, C.D., Wallace, A.R. (1858). On the
tendency of species to form varieties;
and on the perpetuation of varieties
and species by natural means of
selection. Journal of the Proceedings of
the Linnean Society 3, 45–62.
De Wit, R., Bouvier, T. (2006). “Everything
is everywhere, but, the environment
selects”; what did Baas-Becking and
Beijerinck really say? Environmental
Microbiology 8, 755–758.
Desmond, A.J., Moore, J. (1991). Darwin.
London:€Michael Joseph.
Ebach, M., Morrone, J.J., Parenti, L.R.,
Vilora, A.L. (2008). International Code
of Area Nomenclature. Journal of
Biogeography 35, 1153–1157.
Ehrenberg, C.G. (1845). Neue
Untersuchungen über das kleinste
Leben als geologisches Moment.
Bericht über die zurBekanntmachung
geeigneten Verhandlungen der
Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der
Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1845, 53–87.
Ehrenberg, C.G. (1849). Über das
mächtigste bis jetzt bekannt
gewordene (angeblich 500 Fuß
mächtige) Lager von mikroscopischen
h i s t o r i c a l b i o g e o g r a p h y : € e v e r y t h i n g i s e n d e m i c
reinen Kieselalgen Süswasser-Formen
am Wasserfall-Flusse im Oregon.
Bericht über die zur Bekanntmachung
geeigneten Verhandlungen der
Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der
Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1849, 76–87.
Ehrenberg, C.G. (1850). On infusorial
deposits on the River Chutes in Oregon.
American Journal of Science, 2nd ser.
9, 140.
Ehrenberg, C.G. (1854). Mikrogeologie. Das
Erden und Felsen schaffende Wirken der
unsichtbar kleinen selbständigen Lebens
auf der Erde. Leipzig:€Leopold Voss.
Finlay, B.J. (2002). Global dispersal of freeliving microbial eukaryote species.
Science 296, 1061–1063.
Finlay, B.J., Esteban, G.F. (2007). Body
size and biogeography. In Hildrew, A.,
Raffaelli, D., Edmonds-Brown, R. (eds.),
Body Size:€The Structure and Function
of Aquatic Ecosystems, pp. 167–185.
Cambridge:€Cambridge University
Press.
Fitter, A. (2005). Common ground. Current
Biology 15, R185–R187.
Fenchel, T., Finlay, B.J. (2003). Is microbial
diversity fundamentally different
from biodiversity of larger animals
and plants? European Journal of
Protistology 39, 486–490.
Fenchel, T., Finlay, B.J. (2004a). The
ubiquity of small species:€patterns of
local and global diversity. BioScience
54, 777–784.
Fenchel, T., Finlay, B.J. (2004b). Response
from Fenchel and Finlay. BioScience 54,
884–885.
Ferguson Wood, E.J. (1963). Professor L.
G. M. Baas Becking. Limnology and
Oceanography 8, 312.
Good, R. (1947). The Geography of the
Flowering Plants. London:€Longmans
Green.
Gorbushina, A.A., Kort, R., Schulte,€A.
et al. (2007). Life in Darwin’s
dust:€intercontinental transport and
survival of microbes in the nineteenth
century. Environmental Microbiology 9,
2911–2922.
Grehan, J.R., Schwartz, J.H.
(2009). Evolution of the second
orangutan:€phylogeny and
biogeography of hominid origins.
Journal of Biogeography 36, 1823–1844.
Haeckel, E. (1870). Natürliche
Schöpfungsgeschichte.
Gemeinverständliche wissenschaftliche
Vorträge über die Entwicklungslehre im
Allgemeinen und diejenige von Darwin,
Goethe und Lamarck im Besonderen
über die Anwendung derselben auf
den Ursprung des Menschen und
andere damit zusammenhängende
Grundfragen der Naturwissenschaft.
2nd edition. Berlin.
Haeckel, E. (1876). The History of Creation,
or, The Development of the Earth and
its Inhabitants by the Action of Natural
Causes:€Doctrine of Evolution in
General, and of that of Darwin, Goethe,
and Lamarck in Particular (translation
revised by E. Ray Lankester ).
London:€Henry S. King.
Haywood, J. (2008). The Great
Migrations:€From the Earliest
Humans to the Age of Globalisation.
London:€Quercus Books.
Heino, J., Bini, L.M., Karjalainen, S.M. et al.
(2010). Geographical patterns of microorganismal community structure:€are
diatoms ubiquitously distributed
across boreal streams? Oikos 119,
129–137.
Humphries, C.J., Parenti, L.R.
(1999). Cladistic Biogeography.
Interpreting Patterns of Plant and
Animal Distributions. 2nd Edition.
Oxford:€Oxford University Press.
27
28
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Jacobs, M. (1984). Herman Johannes Lam
(1892–1977):€the Life and Work of a
Dutch Botanist. Amsterdam:€Rodopi.
Jardine, B. (2009). Between the Beagle and
the barnacle:€Darwin’s microscopy,
1837–1854. Studies in History and
Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical
Sciences 40, 382–395.
Kellogg, C.A., Griffin, D.W. (2006).
Aerobiology and the global transport
of desert dust. Trends in Ecology and
Evolution 21, 638–644.
Koch, L.F. (1957). Index of biotal dispersity.
Ecology 38, 145–148.
Kociolek, J.P., Lyon, D., Spaulding,
S.A. (2001). Revision of the South
American species of Actinella. In
Jahn, R., Kociolek, J.P., Witkowski, A.,
Compére, P. (eds.), Lange-BertalotFestschrift:€Studies on Diatoms,
pp. 131–166. Koenigstein: Koeltz
Scientific Books.
Kohn, M. (2006). Made in Savannahstan.
New Scientist 191(2558), 34–39.
Kuehne, H.A., Murphy, H.A., Francis, C.A.,
Sniegowski, P.D. (2007). Allopatric
divergence, secondary contact,
and genetic isolation in wild yeast
populations. Current Biology 17,
407–411.
Lachance, M.-A. (2004). Here and there or
everywhere? Bioscience 54, 884.
Lam, H.J. (1938). Over de theorie der
arealen (chorologie). Vakblad voor
Biologen 5, 77–87.
Liebermann, B.S. (2005). Geobiology
and paleobiology:€tracking the
coevolution of the earth and its biota.
Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology,
Paleoecology 2119, 23–33.
London, J. (1917) The Human Drift. New
York:€The Macmillan Company.
Lόpez, H.L., Menni, R.C., Donato,
M., Miquelarena, A.M. (2008).
Biogeographical revision of Argentina
(Andean and Neotropical Regions):€an
analysis using freshwater fishes.
Journal of Biogeography 35, 1564–1579.
Luther, H. (1963). Botanical analysis of
mute swan faeces. Acta Vertebrata 2,
266–267.
Maguire, B. (1963). The passive dispersal
of small aquatic organisms and their
colonization of isolated bodies of
water. Ecological Monographs 33,
161–185.
Mayr, E. , Provine, W.B. (eds.) (1980). The
Evolutionary Synthesis. Cambridge,
MA:€Harvard University Press.
McCarthy, D. (2009). Here be dragons.
How the Study of Animal and Plant
Distributions Revolutionized our Views
of Life and Earth. Oxford:€Oxford
University Press.
Meyer, K. (1930). Einfuhrung in die
Algenflora des Baicalsees. Byulleten’
Moskovskogo obshchestva ispytatelei
prirody, odtel biologicheskii 39,
179–396.
Mezeltin, D., Lange-Bertalot, H. (2007).
Tropical Diatoms, II:€Special remarks
on biogeographic disjunction.
Annotated Diatom Micrographs. Vol.
18.
Milliger, L.E., Schlichting, H.E. (1968).
The passive dispersal of viable
algae and protozoa by an aquatic
beetle. Transactions of the American
Microscopical Society 87, 443–448.
Moore, J. (2005). Revolution of the Space
Invaders:€Darwin and Wallace on
the geography of life. In Livingstone,
D.N., Withers, C.W.J. (eds.), Geography
and Revolution, pp. 106–132.
Chicago:€University of Chicago Press.
Myers, A.A., de Grave, S. (2000).
Endemism:€Origins and implications.
Vie et Milieu 50, 195–204.
h i s t o r i c a l b i o g e o g r a p h y : € e v e r y t h i n g i s e n d e m i c
Nelson, G. (1978). From Candolle to
Croizat:€Comments on the history of
biogeography. Journal of the History of
Biology 11, 269–305.
Nelson, G. (1983). Vicariance and
cladistics:€Historical perspectives with
implications for the future. In Sims,
R.W., Price, J.H., Whalley, P.E.S. (eds.),
Evolution, Time and Space:€
The Emergence of the Biosphere,
pp. 469–492. London:€Academic Press.
Nelson, G., Platnick, N.I. (1981). Systematics
and Biogeography:€Cladistics and
Vicariance. New York, NY:€Columbia
University Press.
O’Malley, M.A. (2007). The nineteenthcentury roots of ‘everything is
everywhere’. Nature Reviews
Microbiology 5, 647–651.
O’Malley, M.A. (2008). ‘Everything is
everywhere:€but the environment
selects’:€Ubiquitous distribution and
ecological determinism in microbial
biogeography. Studies in History and
Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical
Sciences 39, 314–325.
O’Malley, M.A., Dupré, J. (2007a). Size
doesn’t matter:€towards a more
inclusive philosophy of biology. Biology
and Philosophy 22, 155–191.
O’Malley, M.A., Dupré, J. (2007b).
Towards a philosophy of
microbiology. Studies in History
and Philosophy of Biological and
Biomedical Sciences 38, 775–779.
Parenti, L.R., Ebach, M.C. (2009).
Comparative Biogeography:€Discovering
and Classifying Biogeographical
Patterns of a Dynamic Earth. Berkeley,
CA: University of California Press.
Parenti, L.R., Viloria, A.L., Ebach,
M.C., Morrone, J.J. (2009). On
the International Code of Area
Nomenclature (ICAN):€a reply to
Zaragüeta-Bagils et al. Journal of
Biogeography 36, 1619–1621.
Proctor, V.W. (1959). Dispersal of freshwater
algae by migratory waterbirds. Science
130, 623–624.
Quispel, A. (1998). Lourens G.M. Baas
Becking (1895–1963), Inspirator for
many (micro)biologists. International
Microbiology 1, 69–72.
Raby, P. (2002). Alfred Russel Wallace:€A
Life. Princeton, NJ:€Princeton
University Press.
Schlegel, M., Hülsmann, N. (2007).
Protists€– a textbook example for
a paraphyletic group. Organisms,
Diversity and Evolution 7, 166–172.
Schlichting, H.E. (1960). The role of
waterfowl in the dispersal of algae.
Transactions of the American
Microscopical Society 79, 160–166.
Shermer, M. (2002). In Darwin’s
Shadow:€The Life and Science of
Alfred Russel Wallace:€A Biographical
Study on the Psychology of History.
Oxford:€Oxford University Press.
Shreeve, J. (2006). The greatest journey.
National Geographic 209(3), 60–69.
Skabichevsky, A.P. (1977). Vodoroslevye
obrastaniya khetomorfy sublitorali
vostochnogo berega Bajkala. In
Popova, T.G. (ed.), Prirodnye kompleksy
nizshikh rastenji zapadnoj sibiri,
pp. 121–132. Akademiya Nauk SSSR
Sibirskoe Otdelenie tsentral’nyj
sibirskij botanicheskij sad. Izsatel’stvo
‘Nauka’ sibirskoe otdelenie
Novosibirsk.
Skabichevskaya, N.A., Kuzmina, A.E.,
Strelnikova, N.I., Potapova, M.G.,
Williams, D.M. (2004). Alexander
Pavlovich Skabichevsky (November
23, 1904€– May 5, 1990):€An obituary
and bibliography. Diatom Research 18,
385–398.
29
30
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Skabichevskaya, N.A., Strelnikova, N.I.
(2003). [In memoriam:€Alexander
Pavlovich Skabichevsky (1904€– 1990)].
Botanische Zhurnal 88, 142–147.
Skvortzov, B.W. (1937). Bottom diatoms
from Olhon Gate of Baikal Lake,
Siberia. Philippine Journal of Science
62, 293–377.
Skvortzov, B.W., Meyer, C.I. (1928). A
contribution to the diatoms of Baikal
Lake. Proceedings of the Sungaree River
Biological Station 1, 1–55.
Sylvester-Bradley, P.C. (1972). Geobiology
and the future of palaeontology.
Journal of the Geological Society 28,
109–117.
Udvardy, M.D.F. (1975). A classification of
the biogeographical provinces of the
world. IUCN Occasional Paper 18.
Vanormelingen, P., Verleyen, E., Vyverman,
W. (2008). The diversity and distribution
of diatoms:€f rom cosmopolitanism to
narrow endemism. Biodiversity and
Conservation 17, 393–405.
Velasques, G.T. (1940). On the viability
of algae obtained from the digestive
tract of the gizzard shad, Dorosoma
cepedianum. American Midland
Naturalist 22, 376–412.
Vyverman, W., Verleyen, E., Sabbe, K. et al.
(2007). Historical processes constrain
patterns in global diatom diversity.
Ecology 88, 1924–1931.
Wallace, A.R. (1876). The Geographical
Distribution of Animals:€With a
Study of the Relations of Living and
Extinct Faunas as Elucidating the
Past Changes of the Earth’s Surface.
London:€Macmillan.
Westenberg, J. (1977). A Bibliography of
the Publications of Lourens G.M. Baas
Becking. Amsterdam: North Holland
Publishing Company.
Wilkinson, D.M. (2001). What is the
upper size limit for cosmopolitan
distribution in free-living
microrganisms? Journal of
Biogeography 28, 285–291.
Williams, D.M. (1986). Proposal to
conserve the generic name Tetracyclus
against Biblarium (Bacillariophyta).
Taxon 35, 730–731.
Williams, D.M. (1996). Fossil species
of the diatom genus Tetracyclus
(Bacillariophyta, ‘ellipticus’ species
group):€Morphology, interrelationships
and the relevance of ontogeny.
Philosophical Transactions of the
Royal Society, London, series B 351,
1759–1782.
Williams, D.M. (2004). On
diatom endemism and
biogeography:€Tetracyclus and
Lake Baikal Endemic Species.
Proceedings of the 17th International
Diatom Symposium, pp. 433–459.
Bristol:€BioPress Ltd.
Williams, D.M. (2007). Ernst Haeckel
and€Louis Agassiz:€trees that bite
and their geographical dimension.
In Ebach, M.C., Tangey, R.
(eds.),€Biogeography in a Changing
World, pp. 1–59. Boca Raton, FL:€CRC
Press.
Williams, D.M., Ebach, M.C. (2007).
The Foundations of Systematics and
Biogeography. New York:€Springer.
Williams, D.M., Reid, G. (2001). A
bibliography of the botanical work of
Boris V. Skvortzov (1896–1980) with
commentary on the publications
concerning diatoms (Bacillariophyta).
Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural
History), Botany 31, 89–106.
Williams, D.M., Reid, G. (2006a).
Amphorotia nov. gen., a new
genus in the family Eunotiaceae
(Bacillariophyceae), based on Eunotia
clevei Grunow in Cleve et Grunow.
Diatom Monographs 6.
h i s t o r i c a l b i o g e o g r a p h y : € e v e r y t h i n g i s e n d e m i c
Williams, D.M., Reid, G. (2006b). Fossils
and the tropics, the Eunotiaceae
(Bacillariophyta) expanded:€The
Upper Eocene fossil diatom Eunotia
reedi and the Recent marine diatom
Amphora reichardtiana from the
tropics. European Journal of Phycology
41, 147–154.
Williams, D.M., Reid, G. (2009). New
species in the genus Colliculoamphora
Williams and Reid with commentary on
species concepts in diatom taxonomy.
Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia (Eugene
Stoermer Festschrift) 135, 185–200.
Williams, D.M., Khursevich, G.K, Fedenya,
S.A, Flower, R.J. (2006). The fossil
record in Lake Baikal:€Comments
on the diversity and duration of
some benthic species, with special
reference to the genus Tetracyclus.
Proceedings of the 18th International
Diatom Symposium, pp. 465–478.
Bristol:€BioPress Ltd.
Zaragüeta-Bagils, R., Bourdon, E., Ung, V.,
Vignes-Lebbe, R., Malécot, V. (2009).
On the International Code of Area
Nomenclature (ICAN). Journal of
Biogeography 36, 1617–1619.
31
Part II
Prokaryotes
3
Biogeography of prokaryotes
Donnabella C. Lacap, Maggie C.Y. Lau
and Stephen B. Pointing
School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong,
Hong Kong SAR, China
3.1╇ Introduction
Prokaryotic microorganisms are critical to terrestrial and aquatic ecosystem
function due to their involvement in key biogeochemical processes and interaction with macroorganisms (Bell et al., 2005a). The Bacteria are assumed to
occur ubiquitously as a result of their large population sizes, rapid generation
times and high dispersal rates. Increasingly the Archaea are also being recognised as key components of many biomes (Auguet et al., 2010). The long-held
tenet in microbiology that ‘everything is everywhere, the environment selects’
(Baas Becking, 1934) has been employed as a de facto null hypothesis against
which to test the existence of spatio-temporal patterns in prokaryotic distribution. Demonstrating the existence of such patterns and their underlying drivers
is key to understanding microbial biogeography. This has wide-reaching implications for understanding ecosystem function, conservation value for microorganisms and bioprospecting for strains with biotechnology potential (Prosser
et al., 2007).
Biogeography of Microscopic Organisms: Is Everything Small Everywhere?, ed. Diego Fontaneto.
Published by Cambridge University Press. © The Systematics Association 2011.
36
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
3.2╇ The prokaryotic species concept
A major limitation to the elucidation of prokaryotic biogeography lies with
the species concept as applied to prokaryotes. It is necessary to be able to recognise the diversity of species in community-level studies, and also the abundance of a given species in population studies. The traditional view of a species
as a group of individuals that interbreed and are isolated from other species by
barriers to recombination (Mayr, 1957) is generally assumed not to be applicable
to the asexual lifestyle of prokaryotes, although it is emerging that recombinant
events may be more widespread than earlier assumed for some microorganisms
(Fraser et al., 2007). It has been suggested that an ecological species concept be
applied to prokaryotes, where a species (ecotype) within a given niche will arise
due to selective pressures, and this will vary with different niches (Cohan, 2002).
Sequence-based modelling of this concept has resulted in the proposal of ‘ecovar’
epithets to bacterial species binomials in order to delineate putative ecotypes
(Koeppel et al., 2008).
The issue of how to identify a prokaryotic species presents challenges at the genetic level due to the horizontal transfer of genes. These may represent new traits
that become incorporated (non-homologous recombination) or replace existing
genes (homologous recombination). Analysis of cyanobacterial genomes indicates
they comprise a stable core of critical genes that are not subject to horizontal gene
flow, and a variable shell of genes that encode traits that may be acquired or lost
(Shi and Fakowlski, 2008). If this applies to all prokaryotes then the stable core (if
not subject to homologous recombination) might inform a traditional evolutionary species concept whereas the variable shell suggests an ecological species concept could be applied. The vast majority of ecological studies of prokaryotes have
employed analysis of rDNA genes, part of the proposed stable core of the genome,
thus the phylogenetic species concept has been the basis for most interpretations
thus far. However, this approach does not consider the adaptive traits encoded by
loci that are responsible for their distribution.
3.3╇ Estimating prokaryotic diversity
Identification of prokaryotic species from environmental samples based upon
morphological or physiological traits has largely been surpassed in ecological
studies by the use of molecular genetic tools. If cultivated strains are available then a multi-locus sequence analysis (MLSA) approach can yield relatively
robust data on relationships among taxa. Most ecological studies, however,
have centred on the use of rDNA as a marker for phylogenetically defined
taxa. Such approaches have generally employed community fingerprinting
bio g eo g r a ph y of prok a ryotes
techniques such as denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), amplified
ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA) and terminal restriction fragment
length polymorphism (TRFLP). These approaches may also be used to generate
sequence-based data sets but they yield relatively short fragments with limited
value in phylogenetic reconstructions.
An alternative and commonly used approach has been to generate clone
libraries of near full-length rDNA amplicons and sequences from which to make
phylogenetic comparisons. The cloning approach is also commonly used to infer
quantitative data on relative abundance within a community, although even when
sampling relatively large libraries considerable under-sampling of communities is
likely for most environments (Gans et al., 2005), and so this must be considered
when interpreting such data. Application of high-throughput techniques such
as pyrosequencing of rDNA markers from environmental samples (e.g. Edwards
et€al., 2006; Sogin et al., 2006) are emerging as a tool to significantly improve estimates of species richness within a community. This approach also has the potential to elucidate functional capabilities through complete metagenome assembly,
and this will undoubtedly emerge as a powerful tool in microbial ecology studies.
A major barrier to current sequence-based approaches to community diversity
studies remains the specificity of PCR primers. Simulation analysis in our laboratory has revealed that several ‘universal’ primer sets for bacteria and archaea are
unable to amplify certain phyla. There are also no truly universal PCR primers
that amplify phyla across all domains and so information on the overall community is lacking for many microbial habitats. One way to address this shortcoming
is to construct datasets for each domain (Archaea, Bacteria, Eukarya) and then
use quantitative tools such as real-time PCR to estimate relative abundance of
domains. We have applied this approach to lithic microbial communities with
some success (Pointing et al., 2009).
A further issue is that whilst most studies have used DNA markers, it is likely
that, given the ability of prokaryotes to remain dormant for long periods, in some
cases findings may not reflect the active fraction of a given community. This could
be addressed by using RNA-based approaches, and in combination with meta�
transcriptomic and metaproteomic techniques will help to reveal functional relationships and define ecotypes.
3.4╇ Evidence for biogeography among prokaryotes
A key aspect of the ‘everything is everywhere’ hypothesis for microorganisms
has been the assumption that dispersal is ubiquitous and therefore spatial patterns should not arise. Selective pressures in different environmentally defined
niches would then determine the subsequent growth of microorganisms. This
37
38
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
scenario assumes that the resultant high levels of gene flow will outweigh any
variation that arises due to adaptation, genetic drift or mutation, and so a given
niche should support similar organisms regardless of geographic scale. This is
in contrast to macroorganisms where biogeographic patterns are manifest due
to greater restrictions on gene flow, often attributed to size-related (allometric)
dispersal limitations (Rosenzweig, 1995). A large number of studies have demonstrated that bacterial and archaeal taxa display non-random environmental distribution (Hughes Martiny et al., 2006). Relatively few have attempted to
address patterns with respect to spatial scales, environmental factors and temporal scales. Some excellent reviews on this subject have highlighted major
challenges in this area (Green and Bohannan, 2006; Hughes Martiny et al., 2006;
Prosser et al., 2007).
A taxa–area relationship has been demonstrated for tree-hole bacteria and saltmarsh bacteria, where species richness increased with the area sampled (Horner
Devine et al., 2004; Bell et al., 2005b). These findings suggested that prokaryotic distribution might not be ubiquitous, since under such constraints diversity should
display less variability with spatial scale. A major focus of recent research has been
to identify whether spatial scaling of microorganisms is primarily determined by
geographic distance in a distance–decay relationship (dispersal limitation > environmental selection) or by environmental heterogeneity (environmental selection
> dispersal limitation). The existence of a distance–decay pattern for soil microbial
assemblages has been demonstrated on small scales (metres) using DNA fingerprinting (Franklin and Mills, 2003). A study of Pseudomonas phylotypes from soil
using BOX-PCR identified a negative correlation between genetic similarity and
geographic distance on local scales (< 80â•›k m) but not between continents (Cho and
Tiedje, 2000). A DGGE study at the regional scale suggested that for lake bacterial
assemblages distance was more important than environmental heterogeneity in
determining species richness (Reche et al., 2005).
Other studies have concluded that the influence of environmental heterogeneity
was more important than distance to community composition. Comparison of
bacterial rDNA sequences in a salt marsh revealed distance–decay effects at scales
up to hundreds of metres, but this was attributed to environmental heterogeneity
rather than distance (Horner Devine et al., 2004). A DNA fingerprint-based study
of bacterial diversity in lakes concluded that no distance–decay effect existed and
that bacterial diversity was explained largely by pH (Fierer et al., 2007). A DGGEbased study of bacterial colonisation of desert rocks revealed a strong influence for
moisture availability but no distance–decay effects (Warren-Rhodes et al., 2006).
A DGGE-based study of soils from North and South America concluded that variation in bacterial assemblages could largely be explained by soil pH and was independent of geographic distance (Fierer and Jackson, 2006). A study of sequence
data from bacterial assemblages in diverse aquatic and soil environments on a
bio g eo g r a ph y of prok a ryotes
global scale indicated that salinity was the variable best able to explain differences in diversity (Lozupone and Knight, 2007).
In order to fully resolve potential spatial scaling for prokaryotes, a high degree
of taxonomic resolution is required. Relatively few studies have employed such
approaches. The existence of spatial patterns in diversity has been demonstrated
using MLSA for archaea and bacteria. A distance–decay pattern was recorded for
hyperthermophilic Sulfolobus strains isolated from hot springs across three continents, and the effect of variation in temperature, pH or sulphide levels was not
significant (Whitaker et al., 2003). Similarly geographic lineages of thermophilic
hot-spring cyanobacteria were also identified at an intercontinental scale with no
significant influence from a wide range of abiotic variables (Papke et al., 2003).
These studies contradict the notion of ubiquitous dispersal, and imply that dispersal limitations contribute to the existence of endemic variants. We have recently
conducted a study of the cyanobacterial genus Chroococcidiopsis from deserts on
every continent on Earth (Bahl et al., 2011), which suggests that whilst distancedecay may be a regional phenomenon, it is not apparent on a global scale for this
terrestrial bacterium. Rather, the distribution is determined by contemporary climate and historical legacies.
A further issue is the influence of temporal scales on prokaryotic diversity. A
DGGE-based study revealed a taxa–time relationship where diversity decreased
due to selective pressure of environmental factors in bioreactors over a 154-day
period (van der Gast et al., 2008). A comparison of environmental rDNA sequences
for bacteria and archaea in hot springs revealed that pronounced seasonality
occurred but that stochastic disturbance events had little long-term effect on
diversity (Lacap et al., 2007). This highlights the importance of gathering temporal
data sets for both biotic and abiotic variables. The power of phylogenetic data sets
has opened opportunities to explore temporal relationships on a geological timescale where appropriate fossil calibration points are available, as with the cyanobacteria. We have recently constructed a multi-locus temporal phylogeny for the
cyanobacterial genus Chroococcidiopsis recovered from deserts on every continent on Earth (Bahl et al., 2011). This revealed that regionally endemic variants have
persisted over timescales of tens of millions of years with no evidence for recent
inter-regional gene flow. This concept of ‘ancient endemism’ is also supported by a
study of thermophiles in calderas of Yellowstone National Park, where variation in
rDNA sequences could be explained by geological events over the last two million
years but not by contemporary environmental heterogeneity or distance (TakacsVesbach et al., 2008).
The issue of spatio-temporal scaling is far from resolved but we postulate that
from an evolutionary viewpoint:€at local geographic scales where dispersal limitations are minimal, environmental heterogeneity is the major driver of diversity
over time. Across larger distances the effects of dispersal limitation become more
39
40
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
influential and endemic variants may arise for a given niche. Distance–decay
effects€may occur at certain geographic scales. A revision of Baas Becking’s descriptor for influences on prokaryotic distribution can therefore be articulated as:
‘The environment selects, with dispersal effects.’
3.5╇ Filling the gaps
Further work is required to fully resolve and confirm the drivers of spatio-�temporal
scaling in prokaryotic biogeography. These should be guided by the following
questions:€fi rst, do microorganisms exhibit endemism indicative of biogeographic
patterns on a global scale? Second, what is the cause of the geographic signal, dispersal limitations or adaptation to a specific niche? Third, if microbial biogeography is manifest, then what timescales are involved in evolution of endemic
variants? This will require improvements in the approach to sampling and analysis for both biotic and abiotic variables. Sample collection requires relevant geographic scales, and importantly a randomised hierarchical sampling approach in
order to avoid sampling bias. For estimating evolutionary species (i.e. as defined
by stable core genes) sufficient sampling effort must be made and confidence levels expressed. Greater use can be made of phylogenetic data sets for estimating
evolutionary divergences. Functional aspects can be incorporated using transcriptomic or proteomic approaches to infer ecotypes. Long-term monitoring of
abiotic variables and biotic data will also allow greater understanding of the temporal aspects of biogeography.
References
Auguet, J-C., Barberan, A., Casamayor, E.O.
(2010). Global ecological patterns in
uncultured archaea. ISME Journal 4,
182–190.
Baas Becking, L.G.M. (1934). Geobiologie
of€inleiding tot de milieukunde. The
Hague:€Van Stockum and Zoon.
Bahl, J., Lau, M.C.Y., Smith, G.J.D. et al.
(2011). Ancient orgins determine
global biogeography of hot and
cold desert cyanobacteria. Nature
Communications 2,€163.
Bell, T., Newman, J.A., Silverman, B.W.,
Turner, S.L., Lilley, A.K. (2005a).The
contribution of species richness and
composition to bacterial services.
Nature 436, 1157–1160.
Bell, T., Ager, D., Song, J.-I.et al. (2005b).
Larger islands house more bacterial
taxa. Science 308, 1884.
Cho, J.-C., Tiedje, J.M. (2000). Biogeography
and degree of endemicity of fluorescent
Pseudomonas strains. Applied
Environmental Microbiology 66,
5448–5456.
Cohan, F.M. (2002). What are bacterial
species? Annual Review of Microbiology
56, 457–487.
bio g eo g r a ph y of prok a ryotes
Edwards, R.A., Rodriguez-Brito, B., Wegley,€L.
et al. (2006). Using pyrosequencing
to shed light on deep mine microbial
ecology. BMC Genomics 7, 57.
Fierer, N., Jackson, R.B. (2006). The
diversity and biogeography of soil
bacterial communities. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences USA
103, 626–631.
Fierer, N., Morse, J.L., Berthrong, S.T.,
Bernhardt, E.S. (2007). Environmental
controls on the landscape-scale
biogeography of stream bacterial
communities. Ecology 88, 2162–2173.
Franklin, R.B., Mills, A.L. (2003). Multiscale variation in spatial heterogeneity
for microbial community structure
in an eastern Virginia agricultural
field. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 44,
335–346.
Fraser, C., Hanage, W.P., Spratt, B.G.
(2007). Recombination and the nature
of bacterial speciation. Science 315,
476–480.
Gans, J., Wolinsky, M., Dunbar, J. (2005).
Computational improvements reveal
great bacterial diversity and high
toxicity in soil. Science 309, 1387–1390.
Green, J., Bohannan, B.J.M. (2006). Spatial
scaling of microbial biodiversity.
Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21,
501–507.
Horner Devine, C., Lange, M., Hughes, J.B.,
Bohannan, B.J.M. (2004). A taxa–area
relationship for bacteria. Nature 152,
750–753.
Hughes-Martiny, J.B., Bohannan, B.J.M.,
Brown, J.H. et al. (2006). Microbial
biogeography: putting microorganisms
on the map. Nature Reviews
Microbiology 4, 102–112.
Koeppel, A., Perry, E.B., Sikorski, J. et al.
(2008). Identifying the fundamental
units of bacterial diversity:€A paradigm
shift to incorporate ecology into
bacterial systematics. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences USA
105, 2504–2509.
Lacap, D.C., Barraquio, W., Pointing, S.B.
(2007). Thermophilic microbial mats
in a tropical geothermal location
display pronounced seasonal changes
but appear resilient to stochastic
disturbance. Environmental
Microbiology 9, 3065–3076.
Lozupone, C.A., Knight, R. (2007). Global
patterns in bacterial diversity.
Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences USA 104, 11436–11440.
Mayr, E. (ed.) (1957). The Species
Problem. Washington, DC:€American
Association for the Advancement of
Science.
Papke, R.T., Ramsing, N.B., Bateson, M.M.,
Ward, D.M. (2003). Geographical
isolation in hot spring cyanobacteria.
Environmental Microbiology 5, 650–659.
Pointing, S.B., Chan, Y., Lacap, D.C. et al.
(2009). Highly specialized microbial
diversity in hyper-arid polar desert.
Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences USA 106, 19964–19969.
Prosser, J.I., Bohannan, B.J.M., Curtis,
T.P. et al. (2007). The role of ecological
theory in microbial ecology. Nature
Reviews Microbiology 5, 384–392.
Reche, I., Pulido-Villena, E., MoralesBacquero, R., Casamayor, E.O. (2005).
Does ecosystem size determine
aquatic bacterial richness? Ecology 86,
1715–1722.
Rosenzweig, M.L. (1995). Species
Diversity in Space and Time.
Cambridge:€Cambridge University
Press.
Shi, T., Fakowlski, P.G. (2008). Genome
evolution in cyanobacteria:€The stable
core and the variable shell. Proceedings
41
42
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
of the National Academy of Sciences
USA 105, 2510–2515.
Sogin, M.L., Morrison, H.G., Huber, J.A. et al.
(2006). Microbial diversity in the deep
sea and the unexplored ‘rare’ biosphere.
Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences USA 103, 12115–12120.
Takacs-Vesbach, C., Mitchell, K.,
Jackson-Weaver, O., Reysenbach,
A.-L. (2008). Volcanic calderas
delineate biogeographic provinces
among Yellowstone thermophiles.
Environmental Microbiology 10,
1681–1689.
van der Gast, C.J., Ager, D.A., Lilley, A.K.
(2008). Temporal scaling of bacterial
taxa is influenced by both stochastic
and deterministic ecological factors.
Environmental Microbiology 10,
1411–1418.
Warren-Rhodes, K.A., Rhodes,
K.L., Pointing, S.B. et al. (2006).
Hypolithic cyanobacteria, dry limit
of photosynthesis and microbial
ecology in the hyperarid Atacama
Desert, Chile. Microbial Ecology 52,
389–398.
Whitaker, R.J., Grogan, D.W., Taylor,
J.W. (2003). Geographic barriers
isolate endemic populations of
hyperthermophilic archaea. Science
301, 976–978.
4
Thermophilic bacteria in cool soils:
metabolic activity and mechanisms
of dispersal
Roger Marchant 1, Ibrahim M. Banat1
and Andrea Franzetti 2
╇ School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine,
Northern Ireland, UK
2
╇ Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca,
Milano, Italy
1
4.1╇ Introduction
The biogeographic patterns of plants and animals, i.e. the distribution of �biodiversity
over space and time has been studied for many years; however, the question whether
microorganisms display similar biogeographic patterns remains unanswered
(Fenchel et al., 1997). A fundamental assumption that ‘everything is everywhere, but
the environment selects’ was generally promulgated by the Dutch microbiologist
Martinus Wilhelm Beijerinck early in the twentieth century and further supported
by Baas Becking in 1934. This hypothesis strongly influenced the scientific community throughout the century, leading to widespread acceptance (O’Malley €2008). If
Biogeography of Microscopic Organisms: Is Everything Small Everywhere?, ed. Diego Fontaneto.
Published by Cambridge University Press. © The Systematics Association 2011.
44
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
the environment is indeed responsible for ‘selecting’ the Â�organisms in a particular
habitat, then we should expect to be able to identify the specific controlling factors for particular organisms. As a consequence of this speculation and as suggested by the literature and experience, the presence of thermophilic bacteria is to
be expected in hot environments, from which many of these organisms have been
indeed isolated. However, the presence of thermophilic bacteria in cooler environments has been known for many years but few investigations have been carried
out to assess their physiology, their ecological roles and to interpret their presence
in the framework of biogeographic theory. In 2002 Marchant and colleagues initiated the investigation of the occurrence of highly thermophilic bacteria in cool soil
environments, isolating five bacterial strains able to grow aerobically only above
40â•›°C, a temperature never achieved in these soils. Based on this finding, several
questions were raised. What is the frequency of these microorganisms in soils?
What kind of microorganisms are they? What is the extent of their diversity? Are
they metabolically active? Are there potential transport mechanisms that sustain
their presence? This chapter reviews the results of the subsequent research activities carried out at the University of Ulster under the coordination of Professor I.M.
Banat and Professor R. Marchant together with some other worldwide collaborating institutions aimed at answering the aforementioned questions.
4.2╇ Thermophile community in cool temperate soils
The occurrence of thermophilic bacteria in soils from different temperate and cool
environments was highlighted by Marchant et al. (2002a, 2002b). The investigation focused on soil samples from a range of sites in Ireland, and from one site in
Bolivia. Two sites were in Aghadowey, Northern Ireland under established mixed
coniferous and deciduous trees with no ground cover plants (Irish Grid reference
C881 216), the third site was from an established mixed wet meadow area (Irish
Grid reference C881 215). The soil type at both sites was basalt till and the sites had
been undisturbed for at least 15 years. The fourth site was in Coleraine, Northern
Ireland, Irish Grid reference C843 349 from a cultivated basalt till area. Records of
soil temperature at a depth of 50 mm taken over a 30-year period in Coleraine (at
the University of Ulster meteorological station) indicated that the maximum temperature reached during that time was less than 25â•›°C. The fourth site was close
to the Salar de Uyuni, near the village of Colchani in Bolivia at an altitude of 3653
m (66°54ʹW, 20°22ʹS). The area was only sparsely covered in vegetation at a distance of 100 m from the salt plain. All soil samples were taken at a depth of 50 mm
into the mineral layer of the soil. Enrichments were carried out on rich growth
medium at 70â•›°C and 80â•›°C and five pure isolates able to grow at 70â•›°C were selected,
namely B70, F70, T70, I80 and T80. Other non-investigated thermophilic strains
thermophilic bacteria in cool soils
have been isolated from a wide range of samples collected in different part of the
world (Greece, Italy, Turkey, North America and India). The morphological characterisation of these five strains revealed that the cells were narrow rods (0.5–0.7
μmâ•›×â•›1–5 μm), and showed variable Gram-staining, although transmission electron microscopy analyses revealed Gram-positive cell wall architecture; only B70
showed terminal endospores. The metabolic fingerprinting obtained testing several biochemical parameters resulted in three different metabolic groups constituted by B70 and F70 individually and the cluster T70, T80 and I80 characterised
by extensive growth on hydrocarbons. The minimum and the maximum growth
temperature under aerobic conditions ranged from 40 to 45â•›°C and 75 to 80â•›°C,
respectively. Significant were the short generation times of these organisms at the
optimal temperatures (around 75â•›°C) that were less than 30 min. Phylogenetic relationships and taxonomic affiliations of the isolates were performed by means of
Amplified Ribosomal DNA Restriction Analyses (ARDRA) and subsequent sequencing of near full-length of the 16S rRNA gene. These molecular tools allowed all
the isolates to be assigned to the bacterial domain and to the closest phylogenetic
neighbours in the EMBL database. T70, F70 and T80 were closely related (> 99%)
to Geobacillus thermoleovorans strains while 99% of similarity was found for B70
and F70 with Geobacillus caldoxylolyticus (EMBL, AF067651) and Bacillus sp. SK-1
(EMBL, AF 326278), respectively. Since the isolation of these thermophilic bacterial strains from enrichment culture provided only evidence of their presence in the
soil, quantitative data were obtained by plate counting demonstrating that they
were present in high numbers in the soil samples collected in Northern Ireland
(1.5–8.8â•›×â•›104 colony forming unit (cfu) per g) and compare to 10% of the total culturable mesophilic bacteria.
The thermophilic bacterial genus Geobacillus is a relatively recent creation
through the separation of a number of existing species of Bacillus and the addition of some new species isolated from deep oil reservoirs (Nazina et al., 2001).
The type species for the genus is Geobacillus (Bacillus) stearothermophilus, a longestablished and well-studied species. Subsequent to the publication of the new
genus a number of other interesting species have been described from a variety of
geothermal and ambient temperature environments (e.g. Sung et al., 2002; Banat
et al., 2004; Nazina et al., 2004, 2005).
To describe the biodiversity of the thermophilic community using a higher
number of isolates, 52 thermophilic bacterial strains were analysed by ARDRA
and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. The comparison of the profiles obtained
using four different restriction endonucleases allowed differentiation of the isolates in 20 different clusters. Eighteen of these clusters were composed of single
isolates while 12 isolates exhibited restriction patterns indistinguishable from
those of isolate B70, while 19 isolates had identical restriction patterns to T7.
The ARDRA analyses and subsequent sequencing of 16S rRNA indicated that
45
46
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
G.€thermoleovorans and G. caldoxylolyticus, accounted for 50% and 34.6% respectively. The results of these first studies concerning the presence and diversity of
thermophilic bacteria in cool soil clearly demonstrated that there is a great biodiversity of these bacteria within the community and that the Geobacillus genus
is dominant (Rahman et al., 2004).
4.3╇ Activity of thermophiles in cool environments
Some species have been described as able to grow anaerobically by denitrification and examination of genome sequence information confirms the presence
of all the necessary genes for denitrification activity. For this reason the growth
tests reported in the first papers did not completely exclude the possibility that
growth at low temperatures could take place anaerobically using nitrate as the
final electron acceptor. Thus, the effect of temperature on the denitrification process by G.€thermoleovorans T-80 culture was investigated (Marchant et al., 2008).
The cultures were incubated at 35, 40, 45, 50, 60 and 70â•›°C. This assay was conducted in 160 ml serum bottles which were pre-flushed with He. After transferring the culture media (100 ml) the serum bottles were autoclaved at 121â•›°C for
30 min. Glucose, yeast extract and nitrate were added resulting in initial concentrations of 1 g/l, 50 mg/l and 100 mg of nitrogen N/l, respectively. This assay
was conducted using triplicate serum bottles. One serum bottle was used for gas
sampling and the other two serum bottles were used for liquid sampling. In addition to the cultures, an abiotic control was also set up with the denitrifying culture media which was amended with nitrate (100 mg N/l, without biomass and
electron donor).
During the 20 days of incubation nitrate reduction was not observed in the cultures incubated at 35â•›°C (Fig 4.1). In all of the cultures the initial acetate concentration was approximately 25 mg/l which was contributed by the inoculum. For
the cultures incubated at 40â•›°C, after 15 days of lag, complete reduction of nitrate
to nitrite was observed in one serum bottle. Nitrate reduction was also observed
in the second serum bottle after 15 days of incubation, but the reduction rate was
slow, indicating that 40â•›°C is the borderline between activity and non-activity. For
the cultures incubated at 45â•›°C, nitrate reduction was observed after 3 days of a
lag period. Nitrite reduction was complete within 15 days of incubation in both
serum bottles (Fig 4.1). At the end of a 20-day incubation period, all nitrate was
reduced to N2O. For the cultures incubated at 50â•›°C, nitrate reduction started after
1 day of lag period and complete nitrite reduction required approximately 13 days
for both serum bottles. At the end of the 20-day incubation period, all nitrate was
reduced to N2O. For the cultures incubated at 60â•›°C, immediate nitrate and nitrite
reduction took place in both cultures. At the end of the 20-day incubation period,
thermophilic bacteria in cool soils
120
A
100
NO3- control
NO3-1
NO2-1
NO3-2
NO2-2
80
60
40
20
0
Concentration (mg/l)
Concentration (mg/l)
120
0
5
10
15
Time (Days)
20
25
B
100
NO3- control
NO3-1
NO3-2
NO2-1
NO2-2
80
60
40
20
0
0
5
10
15
Time (Days)
20
25
Fig 4.1 Time course of nitrate and nitrite during the denitrification assay with the
G.€thermoleovorans T80 culture at 35â•›°C (A) and 45â•›°C (B); 1 and 2 denote replicate 1, 2,
respectively. Reproduced with permission from Marchant et al. (2008).
all nitrate was reduced to N2O. After 15 days of incubation, N2O reduction to N2 was
observed, but the reduction rate was very low.
The results from the denitrification study gave parallel results to those previously reported for the aerobic activity of Geobacillus, i.e. there is no discernable
activity at temperatures below about 40â•›°C and certainly none at temperatures
close to normal soil temperatures.
The growth experiments with geobacilli both in aerobic and anaerobic conditions
were limited by being carried out in a rich laboratory medium using a pure culture as
inoculum, thus not taking into account unculturable geobacilli and the soil environment. To overcome this limitation, the use of microcosm experiments and molecular techniques were necessary (Marchant et al., 2008). The Fluorescence In Situ
Hybridisation Technique (FISH) was chosen as the tool to quantify the total active
geobacilli directly in environmental samples. The FISH technique uses short fluorescence-labelled oligonucleotides that specifically hybridise with the rRNA allowing
microscopic discrimination of the different taxa. The fluorescence signal associated
with each bacterium reveals both the presence and the activity of the organisms,
since a high number of ribosomes are necessary within the cell to provide the signal.
Soil collected in Northern Ireland was used in microscosm experiments both with
and without the addition of an inoculum of G. thermoleovorans T80.
Ten grams of soil collected in Northern Ireland were placed at different temperatures:€external ambient; 25â•›°C; 37â•›°C; 46â•›°C and 60â•›°C. In another set of microcosms
10 g of soil, spiked with 1 ml of washed G. thermoleovorans T80 culture in PBS buffer (initial OD 600 nm = 0.3) was placed at the same temperatures. After 15 days,
1 g of soil was sampled at each temperature and FISH analysis was carried out.
Separation of microorganisms from the soil matrix was achieved according to a
47
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
published protocol (Caracciolo et al., 2005). FISH analyses were carried out on cut
filter pieces as previously described (Pernthaler et al., 2001). The oligonucleotide
probes used had the following sequences:€EUB338 (Amann et al., 1990)€– GCT GCC
TCC CGT AGG AGT Fluorochrome 5′ Fluorescein targeting bacteria and GEOB
Tbcil832 (Harmsen et al., 1997)€ – GGG TGT GAC CCC TCT AAC Fluorochrome
5′€Cy3, targeting Geobacillus spp. Images were captured using a Nikon ECLIPSE
E 400 epifluorescence microscope. The estimation of microorganisms that bound
the probes was determined in at least five randomly selected fields. Using the
corrected dilution factor (2â•›×â•›8.22â•›×â•›105), the results were referred to 1 g of soil.
Figure€4.2 reports the results of counting total bacteria (EUB probe) and geobacilli
(GEOB probe) at different temperatures.
In the unspiked soil the only temperature at which geobacilli are detectable
is 60â•›°C both after 15 days and 4 months. At this temperature 0.9â•›×â•›106 active
geobacilli/g of soil were detected after 15 days while 0.7â•›×â•›106/g of soil were still
present after 4 months representing 6% and 9% of the total active bacterial community, respectively. These data indicated that at this temperature geobacilli in
the soil are metabolically active but they do not effectively grow, thus indicating that 106 is a good estimate of the presence of total (culturable and unculturable) geobacilli in one gram of soil sample. In the T80 spiked microcosms, after
15 days geobacilli were detected at all tested temperatures; this can be explained
by the hypothesis that G. thermoleovorans is able to maintain a certain number
EUB
GEOB
Ambient
25
37
46
60
EUB
GEOB
25
EUB
GEOB
37
46
60
Only Soil
B
Temperature (°C)
46
37
Temperature (°C)
Soil + T80
25
A
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Temperature (°C)
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Ambient
Only Soil
Number of bacterial cells
× 107/g soil
A
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
60
Number of bacterial cells
× 107/g soil
Number of bacterial cells
× 107/g soil
Soil + T80
Number of bacterial cells
× 107/g soil
48
B
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
EUB
GEOB
Ambient
25
37
46
60
Temperature (°C)
Fig 4.2 Counts of FISH-stained cells using a bacterial probe (EUB) and a specific
Geobacillus probe (GEOB) in soil microcosms after 15 days (A) and 4 months (B). Graphs
on the left represent the microcosms spiked with G. thermoleovorans T80, while the
graphs on the right the microcosms without addition. Reproduced with permission from
Marchant et al. (2008).
thermophilic bacteria in cool soils
Fig 4.3 Bacterial cell using a Geobacillus (GEOB) probe in T80 spiked microcosm at 46â•›°C
(A) and 60â•›°C (B).
of ribosomes over the first two weeks at a wide range of temperatures. After 4
months geobacilli were countable only at 46â•›°C and 60â•›°C reaching a value of
1.3â•›×â•›106/g of soil at 60â•›°C which is comparable with the unspiked microcosms.
Figure 4.3 shows Geobacillus cells detected by GEOB probe in T80 spiked microcosms at 46â•›°C and 60â•›°C.
FISH experiments confirmed the relationship between growth and temperature
obtained in liquid growth experiments both in aerobic and anaerobic conditions.
In the soil total thermophilic geobacilli seem to be inactive below 40â•›°C, at least as
detected by FISH technique.
Another proof of this behaviour under in situ conditions has been obtained by
analysing the expression of the alkane mono-oxygenase gene (alkB) by thermophilic soil bacteria (Marchant et al., 2006). Many geobacilli and particularly G.€thermoleovorans are well-known hydrocarbon degraders with high similarity with
mesophilic bacteria for the sequences of one of the key enzymes for alkane biodegradation (i.e. alkB:€alkane-1-mono-oxygenase). In this study, soil microcosms
were established in glass universals using glass wool as an interface between 1 ml
n-hexadecane and 10 g of soil. The microcosms were then incubated for up to 14
days at room temperature, and 25, 30, 37 and 55â•›°C. A further soil microcosm was
also inserted in situ just below the surface soil layer in the natural environment
for the same period of time. Control microcosms containing no alkane were also
prepared. On soil samples, RT-PCR analyses were performed.
A positive detection of the expression of alkB gene by RT-PCR was detected
only in soil samples kept for some days at least at 55â•›°C in the presence of the
hydrocarbon. It was also demonstrated that alkB production did not originate
from meso�philic microorganisms. The same results were obtained using pure
cultures of G.€ thermoleovorans T80. These results highlighted the specificity of
thermophiles for the degradation of hydrocarbons. It is worth noting that in soil
49
50
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
samples taken from a cool region that had never been contaminated with hydrocarbons, raising the temperature is the condition in which the expression of alkB
gene is induced in the microbial community in the presence of added hydrocarbons. This property was further investigated as an innovative bioremediation
alternative (Perfumo et al., 2007). In this study, soil samples were collected in an
undisturbed area in Northern Ireland unpolluted with hydrocarbons. Microcosm
experiments were prepared in sterile bottles containing 5 g of soil with 2% (v/w)
n-hexadecane added. Five different bioremediation techniques were tested:€ (1)
degradation potential by indigenous microorganisms (natural attenuation); (2)
supplementation with inorganic nutrients (Biostimulation); (3) supplementation
with microbial surfactants (Biosolubilisation); (4) supplementation with selected
hydrocarbon-�degrading bacteria (Bioaugmentation); and (5) Biostimulation +
Biosolubilisation + Bioaugmentation. Sterile soil with no amendments was used
as an abiotic control. Microcosms were incubated in the dark at 60â•›°C and at room
temperature (approximately 18â•›°C), and monitored at 0, 5, 15, 30 and 40 d for the
estimation of hydrocarbon content by gas chromatography and the bacterial
populations. Results showed that for all the conditions the biodegradation of the
hydrocarbon was almost doubled at 60â•›°C compared with room temperature. It is
already well established that one of the limiting factors in bioremediation is the
bioavailability of the contaminants. Particularly, for slightly soluble compounds,
such as hydrocarbons, the rate of mass transfer to cells limits the overall biodegradation rate (Boopathy, 2000). Increasing temperature leads to a decreased viscosity, higher solubility and faster diffusion of hydrophobic contaminants to the
cell thus enhancing the biodegradation rates.
The results reported above concerning growth and activity of thermophiles at
different temperatures seem to demonstrate unequivocally that no growth and
activity can be postulated for thermophilic bacteria in cool soils. However, the
most unexpected and important results came from simple long-term pure culture
growth experiments in liquid medium. Sealed replicate universal tubes containing 10 ml of nutrient broth were inoculated with G. thermoleovorans and incubated at 4â•›°C, 25â•›°C, 37â•›°C, 46â•›°C and 60â•›°C for 9 months. The tubes were observed
periodically for visible signs of growth. Tubes incubated at a temperature of 40â•›°C
rapidly showed evidence of growth; even after 9 months, the tubes incubated at
25â•›°C showed no visible evidence of growth, but once transferred to 60â•›°C showed
visible growth after 24 h indicating that viable thermophile cells remained in the
culture. Surprisingly, after 9 months, the tubes maintained at 4â•›°C showed visible evidence of extensive growth. To avoid misinterpretation of the results due
to contamination by psychrophilic bacteria, subcultures were taken from these
tubes and incubated at 70â•›°C, showing that the growth was that of a thermophile.
Furthermore microscopic observation and 16S rRNA sequencing confirmed that
the organism was identical to the original inoculum.
thermophilic bacteria in cool soils
4.4╇ Transport mechanisms and potential sources
The establishment of no or low activity of thermophiles in cool soils led to the speculation that they could be transported from warmer places in which these organisms are better able to grow and divide. Two potential sources for thermophiles
were hypothesised:€a short-range transport by wind from the local environment
in which high temperature conditions can transiently occur (heating facilities,
composting plants …) and a long-range transport by clouds and rainwater from
warmer geographic regions. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses of the
bacterial populations in rainwater and air in Northern Ireland were carried out
(Marchant et al., 2008). Air samplings were carried out from 6 until 30 October
2005 both for counting and isolation of thermophilic microorganisms and weather conditions were recorded. Fifty rainwater samples for thermophilic bacteria
counting were collected from 1 February until 14 May 2004, while eight samples
for isolation were collected from 10 October until 2 November 2005. Wind direction, wind speed and rainfall were further recorded during samplings. Fourteen
rainwater and fourteen airborne microorganisms were isolated that were able to
grow at 70â•›°C. Partial 16S rDNA sequences (at least 900 bases) were determined to
assess the microbial communities of thermophilic bacteria in air and in rainwater
and compare them with the already published characterisation of the thermophilic population in soil (Marchant et al., 2002b). Figure 4.4 shows the phylogenetic tree built with the sequences of all the isolates and the sequences of some
type strains that showed more than 97% sequence similarity with the isolates. In
the rainwater community, all 14 isolates are assigned to Geobacillus; particularly,
12 of them have, as nearest phylogenetic neighbours, Geobacillus thermodenitrificans DSM 465T and Geobacillus subterraneus T34T while two stand very close to
Geobacillus stearothermophilus DSM 22TT, Geobacillus thermocatenulatus DSM
730T, Geobacillus vulcani 3S-1T (Nazina et al., 2004), Geobacillus kaustophilus
NCIMB 8547T and Geobacillus thermoleovorans DSM 5366T.
In the air community, seven isolates are assigned to Bacillus, one to Ureibacillus
and six to Geobacillus. Two air isolates (A9.11 and A9.13) showed very high similarity (> 99%) with a thermophilic environmental isolate submitted as Bacillus
aestuarii (GenBank:€ AB062696) that was included in the tree. Considering all
isolates, four Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) have been defined (each OTU
comprised sequences that shared > 97% sequence identity) by distance analysis.
The two communities showed very different distributions of their isolates along
the€ OTUs. All the isolates of the rainwater community belong to OTU 1, while
in€the air community, six isolates belong to OTU 1, one to OTU 2, three to OTU 3
and four to OTU 4. Furthermore, only in the air samples were three microorganisms isolated able to grow at 60â•›°C but not at 70â•›°C, which were morphologically
51
52
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Fig 4.4 Unrooted phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene comparison showing the
position of rainwater (bold) and air isolates and the type strains most closely related
(italic). Bootstrap probability values less than 50% were omitted from the figure. The scale
bar indicates substitutions per nucleotide position. The GenBank accession numbers of
type strains are in parentheses. Reproduced with permission from Marchant et al. (2008).
identified as thermotolerant Actinomycetales. This distribution led to the conclusion that the rainwater community of thermophilic bacteria is characterised
by a lower biodiversity than the air one. To confirm this lack of biodiversity in
rainwater and to avoid any influence due to seasonality, another two rainwater
thermophilic bacteria in cool soils
samplings were carried out in January 2006. Ten microorganisms were isolated
and 8 showed very high similarity with Geobacillus thermodenitrificans DSM 465T
while two isolates shared > 99% sequence similarity with Ureibacillus thermosphericus P-11T. The structure of the rainwater community seems to be more similar to the structure of the soil community than does the air community suggesting
that rainwater deposition could be a mechanism that sustains the thermophilic
community in these soils.
For quantitative analyses, thermophilic bacteria were determined by the Most
Probable Number (MPN) technique at 70â•›°C in liquid medium, while airborne
thermophiles were quantified by direct sampling and growth at 70â•›°C on agar-rich
medium. For air samplings a mean value of 1.55 cfu/1000 l of air was obtained. For
rainwater counting, thermophilic bacteria were found in detectable numbers only
in nine samples. The mean value of these nine samples was 8.5 cells/100 ml, while
considering the whole amount of sampled water, the mean was 1.1 cells/100 ml.
Furthermore, from rainfall data and MPN counting, it is possible to calculate the
total number of thermophilic microorganisms that have been deposited onto 1 m2
of soil during the sampling period; a value of 9.5â•›×â•›103, or an average of 140 for each
millimetre of rainfall. Considering an average rainfall value in this part of Ireland
of 1000 mm per year, the total annual input of thermophilic microorganisms from
rainwater to soil could be estimated as 1.4â•›×â•›105/m2 of soil surface. Marchant et al.
(2002a) found values of thermophiles for this area ranging from 1.5–8.8â•›×â•›104 cfu/g
soil at 50 mm. Also considering 50 mm as the maximum depth affected by rainwater deposition the number of thermophiles on 1 m2 of soil ranges from 0.75 to
4.4â•›×â•›109 cfu/m2. This means that only a small fraction (0.3–2â•›×â•›10 –5) of thermophiles
can be replaced yearly by rainwater deposition. Therefore, assuming the rainwater
deposition as the only source of thermophiles, it would not be possible to maintain
a high and constant viable population of thermophiles without their growth or
survival in the soil.
Although the studies of thermophilic geobacilli in rainwater provided an
important insight into the origin of these organisms in cool soils they still did
not identify the ultimate origin of the microorganisms. Since the advent of satellite imaging it has become apparent that considerable global transport of dust
occurs and that one of the major origins for these dust storms is the Sahara/
Sahel region of Africa (Griffin et al., 2002). Dust from this region travels northwards over the Mediterranean countries where it is often deposited in a dry form.
Further movement then takes the dust over northern Europe and across the
Atlantic to the Caribbean and southern USA. Dry dust deposition does not occur
in northern€Europe but the dust is precipitated in rainfall. To test the hypothesis
that the€ultimate origin of thermophilic geobacilli in rainfall in northern Europe
is Saharan dust storms, samples of dry dust were collected and were examined
for the presence of thermophilic geobacilli using culture methods (Perfumo and
Marchant, 2010). Samples of dust collected in Turkey and Greece following two
53
54
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
distinct desert storm events contained viable thermophilic organisms of the
genus Geobacillus, namely G. thermoglucosidasius and G. thermodenitrificans,
and the recently reclassified Aeribacillus pallidus (formerly Geobacillus pallidus).
These results provided evidence that African dust storms create an atmospheric
bridge between distant geographic regions and that they are also probably the
source of thermophilic geobacilli later deposited over northern Europe by rainfall
or dust plumes themselves. The same organisms (99% similarity in the 16S rDNA
sequence) were found in dust collected in the Mediterranean region and inhabiting cool soils in Northern Ireland (Perfumo and Marchant, 2010).
4.5╇ Conclusions
In recent years, the Baas Becking hypothesis has provoked intense discussions
and some investigations have been carried out to verify it. A recent review has
drawn attention to the two components of biogeographic distribution, the province and the habitat (Hughes Martiny et al., 2006). The province represents the legacy of historical events while the habitat represents the existing environment for
the organism. This review identified four possible hypotheses to describe microbial biogeography patterns and attempted to differentiate between the �possible
alternatives with the aim of evaluating whether the biogeographic pattern of
macro�organisms can be applied to microorganisms. The first alternative is that
microorganisms are randomly distributed over space while in a second hypothesis
only environmental conditions affect the geographic distribution of microorganisms. The latter is the Baas Becking hypothesis:€‘everything is everywhere, but the
environment selects’. In the third hypothesis, the present distribution of microorganisms is influenced only by historical events, while the fourth one allows both
legacy of past historical events and present environmental conditions to influence
the biogeography of microorganisms. The results of some investigations led the
authors to conclude that the environment actually selects and shares with the
legacy of historical events the responsibility for the spatial variation of microorganisms. However, as reported by the authors of the review, the idea that all the
attributes of the organism that can potentially influence their spatial distribution
can be described allometrically does not capture the complexity of the microbial
world. Dispersal, colonisation, extinction and diversification are processes that
shape the biogeography of the organisms and the wide metabolic diversity among
Bacteria, Archaea and microscopic Eukarya makes it difficult to find a simple correlation between size and the rate of these processes. For instance, the dispersal
rate is strongly influenced by tolerance to the extreme environmental conditions
that microorganisms experience during passive transport. �Spore-forming bacteria
thermophilic bacteria in cool soils
have an advantage in being transported for long distances. Thus, the spatial dispersal of microorganisms depends not only on their size, but also on their specific
attributes.
The results reported in this chapter report the presence and activity of bacteria
in an environment that potentially does not allow their growth due to the low temperatures. Since it has been demonstrated that Geobacilli are extremely resistant to
space vacuum, UV radiation and gamma-ray exposure and are the only microorganisms selected from hot environments under these extreme conditions (Saffary
et al., 2002), it can be hypothesised that members of the genus Geobacillus are present wordwide due to this resistance to stress. In this sense, the assumptions of the
Baas Becking hypothesis hold true for this kind of bacterium. Moreover, for geobacilli the selection of the cold environments seems not to hold since at least a slow
growth is supposed to sustain their large population in cold soils. This growth is
probably explained by the balance of growth and death rate at low temperatures.
In geobacilli, at temperatures above 40â•›°C, the growth rate exceeds the death rate,
and this differential increases up to 60â•›°C; at temperatures between ambient and
37â•›°C, the death rate is higher than the growth rate, preventing any increase in
biomass in freshly inoculated cultures (Pavlostathis et al., 2006). Thus, it can be
supposed that the growth at 4°C over protracted time periods can be explained by
a low growth rate but an even lower death rate. These specific features make members of the genus Geobacillus cosmopolitan microorganisms.
References
Amann, R.I., Binder, B.J., Olson, R.J. et€al.
(1990). Combination of 16S rRNAtargeted oligonucleotide probes with
flow cytometry for analyzing mixed
microbial populations. Applied
Environmental Microbiology 56,
1919–1925.
Banat, I.M., Marchant, R., Rahman, T.J.
(2004). Geobacillus debilis sp. nov.,
a novel obligately thermophilic
bacterium isolated from a cool soil
environment, and reassignment
of Bacillus pallidus to Geobacillus
pallidus comb. nov. International
Journal of Systematics and
Evolutionary Microbiology 54,
2197–2201.
Boopathy, R. (2000). Factors limiting
bioremediation technologies.
Bioresource Technology 74, 63–67.
Caracciolo, A.B., Grenni, P., Cupo, C.,
Rossetti, S. (2005). In situ analysis
of native microbial communities in
complex samples with high particulate
loads. FEMS Microbiology Letters 253,
55–58.
Fenchel, T., Esteban, G.F., Finlay, B.J.
(1997). Local versus global diversity of
microorganisms:€cryptic diversity of
ciliated protozoa. Oikos 80, 220–225.
Griffin, D.W., Kellogg, C.A., Garrison,
V.H., Shinn, E.A. (2002). The global
transport of dust. American Scientist
90, 228–235.
55
56
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Harmsen, H., Prieur, D., Jeanthon, C.
(1997). Group-specific 16S rRNAtargeted oligonucleotide probes to
identify thermophilic bacteria in
marine hydrothermal vents. Applied
and Environmental Microbiology 63,
4061–4068.
Hughes Martiny, J.B., Bohannan, B.J.M.,
Brown, J.H. et al. (2006). Microbial
biogeography: putting microorganisms
on the map. Nature Reviews
Microbiology 4, 102–112.
Marchant, R., Banat, I.M., Rahman, T.J.,
Berzano, M. (2002a). The frequency and
characteristics of highly thermophilic
bacteria in cool soil environments.
Environmental Microbiology 4,
595–602.
Marchant, R., Banat, I.M., Rahman, T.J.,
Berzano, M. (2002b). What are high
temperature bacteria doing in cold
environments? Trends in Microbiology
10, 120–121.
Marchant, R., Sharkey, F.H., Banat, I.M.,
Rahman, T.J., Perfumo, A. (2006). The
degradation of n-hexadecane in soil
by thermophilic geobacilli. FEMS
Microbiology Ecology 56, 44–54.
Marchant, R., Franzetti, A., Pavlostathis,
S.G. et al. (2008). Thermophilic bacteria
in cool temperate soils:€are they
metabolically active or continually
added by global atmospheric
transport? Applied Microbiology and
Biotechnology 78, 841–852.
Nazina, T.N., Tourova, T.P., Poltaraus,
A.B. et al. (2001). Taxonomic
study of aerobic thermophilic
bacilli:€descriptions of Geobacillus
subterraneus gen. nov., sp. nov. and
Geobacillus uzenensis sp. nov. from
petroleum reservoirs and transfer
of Bacillus stearothermophilus,
Bacillus thermocatenulatus, Bacillus
thermoleovorans, Bacillus kaustophilus,
Bacillus thermoglucosidasius
and Bacillus thermodenitrificans
to Geobacillus as the new
combinations G. stearothermophilus,
G.€thermocatenulatus,
G.€thermoleovorans, G. kaustophilus,
G. thermoglucosidasius and
G.€thermodenitrificans. International
Journal of Systematics and Evolutionary
Microbiology 51, 433–446.
Nazina, T.N., Lebedeva, E.V., Poltaraus,
A.B. et al. (2004). Geobacillus gargensis
sp. nov., a novel thermophile from a
hot spring, and the reclassification
of Bacillus vulcani as Geobacillus
vulcani comb. nov. International
Journal of Systematics and Evolutionary
Microbiology 54, 2019–2024.
Nazina, T.N., Sokolova, D.S., Grigoryan,
A.A. et al. (2005). Geobacillus
jurassicus€sp. nov., a new thermophilic
bacterium isolated from a hightemperature petroleum reservoir,
and the validation of the Geobacillus
species. Systematic and Applied
Microbiology 28, 43–53.
O’Malley, M.A. (2008). Everything is
everywhere:€but the environment
selects:€ubiquitous distribution and
ecological determinism in microbial
biogeography. Studies in History and
Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical
Sciences 39, 314–325.
Pavlostathis, S.G., Marchant, R., Banat,
I.M., Ternan, N.G., McMullan,€G.
(2006). High growth rate and
substrate exhaustion results in
rapid cell death and lysis in the
thermophilic bacterium Geobacillus
thermoleovorans. Biotechnology and
Bioengineering 95, 84–95.
Perfumo, A., Marchant, R. (2010). Global
transport of thermophilic bacteria
in atmospheric dust. Environmental
Microbiology Reports 2, 333–339.
thermophilic bacteria in cool soils
Perfumo, A., Banat, I.M., Marchant, R.,
Vezzulli, L. (2007). Thermally enhanced
approaches for bioremediation of
hydrocarbon-contaminated soils.
Chemosphere 66, 179–184.
Pernthaler, J., Glöckner, F-O., Schönhuber,
W., Amann, R. (2001). Fluorescence in
situ hybridization (FISH) with rRNAtargeted oligonucleotide probes.
Methods in Microbiology 30, 207–226.
Rahman, T.J., Marchant, R., Banat, I.M.
(2004). Distribution and molecular
investigation of highly thermophilic
bacteria associated with cool soil
environments. Biochemical Society
Transactions 32, 209–213.
Saffary, R., Nandakumar, R., Spencer,
D. et al. (2002). Microbial survival of
space vaccum and extreme ultraviolet
irradiation:€strain isolation and
analysis during a rocket flight. FEMS
Microbiology Letters 215, 163–168.
Sung, M.-H., Kim, H., Bae, J.-W. et al.
(2002). Geobacillus toebii sp nov., a
novel thermophilic bacterium isolated
from hay compost. International
Journal of Systematics and Evolutionary
Microbiology 52, 2251–2255.
57
Part III
Unicellular eukaryotes
5
Dispersal of protists:€the role of cysts and
human introductions
Wilhelm Foissner
FB Organismische Biologie, Universität Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
5.1╇ Introduction
While the distribution of flowering plants and larger animals is easy to determine, this is almost impossible in microorganisms, which are smaller than
human beings by a factor of 1.8â•›×â•›106, assuming an average size of 100 µm and
180 cm, respectively. Thus, the subject has been searched with varied success
and in heated debates (Foissner, 2004; Fenchel and Finlay, 2005), resulting in
two hypotheses:€the ‘cosmopolitan model’ (Finlay, 2002; Finlay et al., 2004) and
the ‘moderate endemicity model’, which suggests that one-third of protists has
restricted distribution (Foissner, 1999, 2006, 2008). The cosmopolitan model is
based on ecological theory, while the moderate endemicity model emphasises
flagship species which are so showy, or so novel, that it is unlikely that they would
be overlooked if indeed they were widely distributed (Tyler, 1996). The debate
has stimulated many investigations whose conclusions frequently read as follows (Bass et al., 2007):€‘Our results strongly suggest that geographic dispersal in
macroorganisms and microbes is not fundamentally different:€some taxa show
restricted and/or patchy distributions while others are clearly cosmopolitan.
Biogeography of Microscopic Organisms: Is Everything Small Everywhere?, ed. Diego Fontaneto.
Published by Cambridge University Press. © The Systematics Association 2011.
62
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
These results are concordant with the ‘moderate endemicity model’ of microbial biogeography. Rare or continentally endemic microbes may be ecologically
significant and potentially of conservational concern. We also demonstrate that
strains with identical 18S but different ITS1 rDNA sequences can differ significantly in terms of morphological and important physiological characteristics,
providing strong additional support for global protist biodiversity being significantly higher than previously thought.’
Thus, there is hardly any need to enlarge this subject again (for recent reviews,
see Dolan, 2005; Martiny et al., 2006; Foissner, 2006, 2008; Caron, 2009). In contrast, little attention has been paid to the reasons why certain species are cosmopolitan and others are not, as evident from the reviews just cited. Wilkinson (2001)
and Smith et al. (2008) suggested size and/or air currents as important dispersal
factors. However, this has been abandoned by Foissner (2008). He emphasised
that microfungi, mushrooms, mosses and ferns are not cosmopolitan although
their dispersal means, the spores, are very abundant and usually less than
100€µm in size, corresponding to the trophic and cystic size of most protists (but
see Chapters 8–12).
Thus, the reasons for cosmopolitan or restricted distribution must be different.
In my opinion, the most important factors are the resting cysts, the geological
history and human introductions. The overwhelming structural and chemical
diversity of resting cysts becomes meaningful if one considers cysts not only as a
simple dormant stage but as dispersal means. This has been widely neglected in
the ‘everything is everywhere’ debate, and thus I shall devote half of this review
to the demonstration of cyst diversity, hoping to revive cystology (Gutiérrez and
Walker, 1983). The second important factor is the break of Pangaea into Laurasia
and Gondwana about 120 million years ago. This has been discussed in several
reviews (Foissner, 2006; Smith et al., 2008) and is thus excluded from the present
one. The third main factor is human introductions, frequently underweighted by
protist biogeographers (Foissner, 2006).
5.2╇ Dispersal of protists
I recognise four main routes:€ dispersal in active (non-encysted) state; dispersal by protective resting cysts; dispersal by humans; and dispersal by geological
processes, especially the break of Pangaea and continental drift. As mentioned in
section 5.1, the palaeobiogeographic route is not treated here.
5.2.1╇ Dispersal in active state
Usually, live protists are very fragile. Thus, it is reasonable that dispersal occurs
mainly in the cystic state (see section 5.2.2). Nonetheless, dispersal in the active
state is possibly also rather common, especially in marine environments, where
dispersal of protists
large water currents might disperse species over large areas or even globally.
However, benthic and planktonic foraminifera have distinct areals (Darling and
Wade, 2008; Pawlowski and Holzman, 2008), just as other marine protists, for
instance, the coccolithophores (Winter et al., 1994).
On land, step-by-step dispersal might be of considerable significance, especially in euryoecious species and at local, regional and continental scales (Green
and Bohannan, 2006). Many experiments show that new habitats are often colon�
ised within a few weeks (for reviews, see Maguire, 1963, 1971). Unfortunately,
�species have been rarely identified, for instance, by Wanner and Dunger (2001)
and Meisterfeld (1997), who studied testacean communities from reforested opencast mining sites. Colonisation was fast, but only euryoecious species developed,
and most humus-specific species disappeared within a year at a site that was
amended with humus from a primary forest to stimulate succession. This matches
my (unpublished) observations on ciliates. Only nine euryoecious species colon�
ised three small, artificial ponds within a year, in spite of excess food (for details,
see legend to Fig 5.1), and few freshwater ciliate species survived when added to
soil (Foissner, 1987, table 15).
Some of the most widespread ciliates, e.g. Glaucoma scintillans, Colpidium
colpoda and species of the Paramecium aurelia and the Tetrahymena pyriformiscomplex very likely lack the ability to produce resting cysts, although they have
7
6
Number of species
5
4
3
2
1
Winter (ice)
0
A
M
Year 2009
J
J
A
S
O
N
D
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
Month
Year 2010
Fig 5.1 Number of ciliate species developing in three artificial ponds containing 1.5€l,
6€l and 12 l tap water and 0.1 g, 0.4 g and 0.8 g porridge oats. The experiment started
on 1€April 2009 and is still running. A detailed description will be published later.
Altogether, nine species were recognised:€Apocyclidium terricola, Chilodonella uncinata,
Colpoda inflata, Epistylis opercularia, Odontochlamys alpestris, Pseudochilodonopsis
algivora, Stylonychia pustulata, Tetrahymena rostrata and Vorticella infusionum. With
the exception of E. opercularia, which is possibly an ‘air ciliate’, all species are common,
euryoecious inhabitants occurring in both limnetic and terrestrial habitats. Note the
disappearance of the ciliates during a bloom of various algae and cyanobacteria.
63
64
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
been reported in both Paramecium (for a review, see Wichterman, 1986) and
Tetrahymena pyriformis (Nilsson, 2005). However, the evidence is not convincing
and not supported by my data. I never found any Paramecium in over 1000 air-dried
and then rewetted soil samples from a great variety of habitats globally, including
soil from flood plains and the surface of dry, ephemeral puddles (Foissner, 1998;
Chao et al., 2006). Likewise, I did not find any Paramecium in about 200 samples
from tank bromeliads of Central and South America, although it occurred in rivers
and streams nearby (Foissner, unpublished). Further, my own experiments with
G. scintillans and Colpidium kleinii failed. Thus, I join that group of scientists who
believes that certain Paramecium and Tetrahymena species cannot make protective resting cysts.
Certainly, cystless species are a challenge to all dispersal models, including
my cyst theory. While wide dispersal in the active state could be possible in
encased species or in species with a thick cortex, as in Paramecium, this appears
unlikely for fragile species like Tetrahymena and Glaucoma. I speculate that
some of these species, especially those with a wide ecological range, may have
distributed step by step or are older than the break of Pangaea. Further, we cannot exclude that such species were originally able to perform anabiosis (anhydrobiosis), i.e. to dry up without forming a special cyst, and becoming viable
again when water becomes available. Although anhydrobiosis is extremely rare
in present-day ciliates (I know it from only one Podophrya-like suctorian ciliate),
it might have been more common in certain developmental stages of the species
millions of years ago.
As protists are very small and thus of low weight, it is widely believed that air
currents and animal vectors are the main distribution agents (Maguire, 1963;
Cowling, 1994; Hamilton and Lenton, 1998; Wilkinson, 2001; Smith et al., 2008).
Wilkinson (2001) showed by a detailed analysis of Arctic and Antarctic testacean
communities that only large species (>â•›150 µm) are possibly not cosmopolitan.
All the data and hypotheses reviewed above, and many more not mentioned,
are in conflict with a simple fact (Foissner, 2006, 2008; Fig 5.2; see also Chapters
9–12):€mushrooms, mosses, ferns, lichens and horsetails have restricted distributions although their distribution means (spores) are produced in masses and in
the size of most protists (≤â•›100 µm). Further, hundreds of bacterial and fungal pests
had regional or continental distribution before they were dispersed by humans.
This is why I believe that, for example, air currents and the size of the organisms
have little influence on their distribution. This has been supported by a study on
microscopic fungi (Taylor et al., 2006). Actually, we do not know the amount of
stable populations established by dispersal in the active state. Based on the data
discussed above, step-by-step distribution of both, in active and cystic states, may
play a significant role in at least the euryoecious species and if many similar habitats occur in a certain region.
dispersal of protists
Fig 5.2 This figure compares, at about the same magnification, trophic and cystic protists
(ciliates, flagellates, naked and testate amoebae) with spores of macrofungi (mushrooms),
mosses, ferns and the minute seed of an orchid (Vanda caerulescens). Obviously, all are
of minute size and very abundant, for instance, a single Agaricus campestris (mushroom)
releases 1.6â•›×â•›1010 spores within 6 days (Webster, 1983), which exceeds the abundance of
ciliates in 1 m 2 of forest soil by several orders of magnitude (Meyer et al., 1989). While
nobody denies that mushrooms, mosses and ferns have biogeographies, protists are
widely assumed to be cosmopolitan because their small size and high abundance favour
air dispersal, an opinion flawed by this figure. Further, protist cysts lack adaptations for
air dispersal, while seeds of many flowering plants have such adaptations, for instance,
the orchid seed shown which has wings of large-sized, air-filled cells. Reproduced with
permission from Foissner (2008).
65
66
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
5.2.2╇ Dispersal by resting cysts
Many protists can produce a dormant stage, named protective resting cyst, resting cyst (my preferred term), cyst, spore or stomatocyst, depending on the group
under investigation. Resting cysts are widely assumed to be the major dispersal
agents of unicellular organisms because they are much more stable than live cells
(for reviews, see Corliss and Esser, 1974; Foissner, 1987; Gutiérrez and MartinGonzález, 2002). However, the biogeographic research and discussion ignored
almost completely the very different morphological and physiological properties
of resting cysts, depending on intrinsic (phylogenetic) and extrinsic (habitats s.l.)
factors. Thus, I shall review here some recent studies, showing the overwhelming
resting cyst diversity. For instance, the resting cyst of Maryna umbrellata is covered with glass granules, representing the first record of biomineralised silicon in
ciliates (Foissner et al., 2009). It was just this diversity and some ‘simple’ observations reported below, which convinced me that cysts are possibly the most important factor for the dispersal of species (cosmopolitan or of restricted distribution)
and for their presence/absence in a certain habitat, at a certain time, and under
certain environmental conditions.
Unfortunately, our knowledge on the physiology, morphology and macromolecular composition of resting cysts is very limited. Thus, it is not yet possible to
ascribe a certain function to the individual cyst layers. However, some general knowledge is available and has been reviewed by Corliss and Esser (1974),
Foissner (1987, 2005, 2009), Gutiérrez and Martin-González (2002), Gutiérrez et al.
(2003), and Foissner et al. (2005). Very briefly, a ‘typical’ cyst of a ciliate consists
of a pericyst, an ectocyst, a mesocyst, an endocyst and, in certain taxa, a metacyst (Figs€5.11, 5.27). The chemical composition of these layers is known in only
a few species (for an example, see Fig 5.11). Generally, acid mucopolysaccharides
are frequent in the pericyst, while proteins, glycoproteins, glycogen and chitin are
frequent in the mesocyst and endocyst. Unfortunately, the chemical composition
of the ectocyst, which is often very thin, is unknown.
5.3╇ Resting cysts of ciliates from rain forests and
hot€deserts
Table 5.1 shows cyst survival of soil ciliates from rain forests in Borneo and
Malaysia and from various habitats of Namibia, including the Namib Desert
(Foissner et al., 2002). In the Namibian samples, there was no loss of species when
the air-dried samples were stored for up to seven years, while most species of the
rain forest soil could be not activated when the air-dried samples were older than
a year, suggesting that the resting cysts died. Obviously, rain-forest ciliates have
dispersal of protists
Table 5.1 Ciliate species numbers in air-dried and rewetteda soil habitats of Namibiab
and in rain forests of Borneo and Malay.
Namibia
Rain forests
Time elapsed since
collection
Number of
species (x̄)
Number of
samples
Number of
species (x̄)
Number of
samples
≤ 10 h
None
Many
25.0
8
Up to 9 months
30.8
23
30.0
7
Up to 65 months
25.9
10
6.4
5
Up to 82 months
41.5
17
1.8
5
a
b
Non-flooded Petri dish method as described in Foissner et al. (2002).
Only ‘typical’ dry soil habitats were selected from the 73 samples investigated, viz., the samples:
1,€2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 20, 23, 24, 26, 27, 29, 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39,
41, 42, 43, 44, 48, 49, 50, 53, 54, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 67, 69, 70, 73.
‘weak’ cysts not adapted to long periods of dryness. Accordingly, they have little
chance to disperse via cysts over large areas. This contrasts with the ‘strong’ cysts
from Namibia. The meaning of ‘weak’ and ‘strong’ is demonstrated by Exocolpoda
augustini (Figs 5.3–5.5) collected in Austria and the dry west coast of Namibia
(Foissner et al., 2002:€site 37). While ordinary cysts with a rather thin (0.5–1â•›µ m)
wall are produced under the moderate Austrian climate (Fig 5.5), the wall of the
Namibian specimens is about 7 µm thick (Fig 5.4), surpassing the volume of the
encysted cell proper three times (3500 µm3 vs. 14â•›000 µm3).
These data match observations from laboratory cultures, where frequently
most of the cysts made do not excyst when fresh medium and food are added,
and cells sometimes lose the ability to make cysts at all, especially on prolonged
cultivation. This makes sense under the constant laboratory conditions, where
the populations select for non-encysters or switch off the encystment genes.
However, the matter is complex, i.e. both encystment and excystment are influenced by many factors, as shown for example by Meier-Tackmann (1982) and
Meier-Tackmann and Wenzel (1988) in a common soil ciliate, Colpoda cucullus,
and by Müller et al. (2006) in Meseres corlissi, a plankton ciliate from ephemeral
fresh waters (Fig 5.22). The often highly varying, ‘mysterious’ encystment and
excystment rates give support to the ‘scout theory’ of Epstein (2009). This theory suggests that microbial populations consist of a mix of active and dormant
cells. Faced with an adverse environmental change, more cells are included into
dormancy, and survive the challenge. Individual cells would then periodically
exit dormancy as a result of infrequent and essentially random events, such as a
change in the expression of a master regulatory gene. I call such awakened cells
‘scouts’. If the adverse conditions persist, the scout dies. If a scout forms under
67
68
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Figs 5.3–5.5 Exocolpoda augustini, a small, terrestrial ciliate (3), makes extremely
thick-walled resting cysts (4, opposed arrowheads) in the Namib desert, but makes
ordinary-walled cysts in Austria (5, opposed arrowheads). OA€– entrance to oral
apparatus. Scale bars 25 µm. From Foissner et al. (2002) and original (5).
growth-permissive conditions, it starts a new population. In some species, scouts
might even use growth-inducing signalling compounds to wake up the rest of the
dormant population.
5.4╇ Some remarkable ciliate resting cysts
5.4.1╇ Maryna umbrellata (Colpodea)
This mushroom-shaped ciliate is about 100â•›µ m in size, and is common in ephemeral limnetic habitats, such as rock pools and meadow puddles (Figs 5.6–5.10).
The globular resting cyst is conspicuous because it is as large as the trophic cell.
Maryna umbrellata is restricted to the northern hemisphere. In Africa, Australia,
Central America and South America occurs a similar but smaller species having
larger (up to 5â•›µ m) silicon granules.
The fine structure and chemical composition of the resting cyst of M. umbrellata
were studied by Foissner (2009) and Foissner et al. (2009). This showed the following peculiarities:€(i) the cyst wall is about 13â•›µ m thick and thus amounts for half
of the total cyst volume (Fig 5.8); (ii) the external, about 4â•›µ m-thick layer is made
Figs 5.6–5.10 Maryna umbrellata, a c. 100â•›µ m-sized colpodid ciliate, typically living in
ephemeral puddles, makes globular resting cysts covered with a layer of glass (silicon)
granules (7–10). 6:€Overview of a trophic specimen in the SEM. 7:€The cyst surface
is covered by about 1â•›µ m-sized glass granules well recognisable in the SEM. 8:€The
resting cyst has a c. 13â•›µ m-thick wall composed of many layers, each having a specific
macromolecular composition (see Fig 5.11). The glass granules (G) were solved by
hydrofluoric acid. 9, 10:€Glass layer before and after treatment with hydrofluoric acid.
Arrows mark mucous material that holds together the silicon granules. BL€– basal layer,
EC€– ectocyst, E + C€– endocyst and ciliate cortex, G€– glass granules, L€– lipid droplets,
M€– mesocyst, MT€– mitochondria, P€– pericyst, SG€– spongy globules, W€– cyst wall. Scale
bars 1 µm (9, 10), 4 µm (8), 5 µm (7), and 50 µm (6). With permission from Foissner (2009)
and Foissner et al. (2009).
70
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Fig 5.11 Maryna umbrellata, scheme of resting cyst based on light-and electronmicroscopical observations and cytochemical tests (compare Figs 5.6–5.10). The complex
cyst wall very likely determines the dispersal success, i.e. results in a cosmopolitan or
restricted distribution. With permission from Foissner (2009).
dispersal of protists
of minute glass (silicon) granules with a size of about 1â•›µ m (Figs 5.8–5.10); (iii)€the
mesocyst and endocyst show a high elasticity; (iv) the cytoplasm is studded with
about 4â•›µ m-sized globules consisting of a proteinaceous matrix burrowed by
electron-lucent strands of glycogen (Figs 5.8, 5.11); (v) the fluid portion of the cyst
plasm contains large amounts of acid mucopolysaccharides possibly originating
from decomposed mucocysts; and (vi) the ectocyst precursors are released via the
parasomal sacs of the kinetids. The most remarkable feature, the glass granules, is
produced by the trophic cell and released during the early encystment processes.
Most, possibly all of these peculiarities are related to the ephemeral nature of
the habitat, for instance, the thick wall protects the cell from desiccation, while
the high elasticity and the glass cover might prevent the cell from mechanical
stress (Yang et al., 2009), for instance, when cysts and sand are mixed by a storm.
Certainly, all these properties will influence excystment and cyst viability, and
thus the dispersal success.
5.4.2╇ Pseudomaryna australiensis and Sandmanniella terricola
(Colpodea)
These small ciliates (~50â•›µ m), which live in floodplain soils (Figs 5.12–5.19), have
been described by Foissner (2003) and Foissner and Stoeck (2009). One of these,
P. australiensis lives in a mineralic envelope, making cells and cysts appearing
like inorganic soil particles, possibly protecting them from predators (Figs 5.12–
5.14). Possibly, P. australiensis and S. terricola are restricted to the Australian and
African region, respectively.
Before encysting, most ciliates digest food and expell the remnants, thus
becoming rather hyaline when entering the cystic stage. Pseudomaryna australiensis and S. terricola do the opposite:€they feed, but do not digest, in the trophic
stage, becoming packed with large, compact food vacuoles (Figs 5.13, 5.15–5.17),
which they digest in the resting cyst, using the energy provided for division (Figs
5.18, 5.19). Possibly, this is an extreme adaptation to the ephemeral nature of the
habitat, making it possible to use even very short periods of optimal environmental conditions. The P. australiensis and S. terricola way must not be mixed with the
division cysts of, for example Colpoda, which are covered by a temporary, very
thin wall entirely different from that of the resting cysts (Foissner, 1993).
5.4.3╇ Sorogena stoianovitchae (Colpodea)
This curious ciliate lives on rotting foliage of plants (Figs 5.20, 5.21). It has a size of
30–70â•›×â•›20–45â•›µ m and belongs to the class Colpodea, possibly representing a distinct order (Foissner, 1993; Foissner and Stoeck, 2009).
Sorogena stoianovitchae is the only ciliate that undergoes fruiting body development, and thus was initially thought to be related to the slime molds (Bradbury
and Olive, 1980). The development process can be classified into five stages (Olive
71
72
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Figs 5.12–5.19 Pseudomaryna australiensis (12–15) and Sandmanniella terricola (16–19)
from life. Both species collect bacteria, forming large, compact food vacuoles which
are not digested in the trophic (12, 13, 16, 17) but in the cystic (14, 15, 18) stage, where
they also divide (19). P. australiensis has a mineralic envelope (some particles marked
by arrowheads), making it looking like a soil particle (12–15). CV€–€contractile vacuole,
FV€–€food vacuoles, LF€– left oral ciliary field, ME€– mineralic envelope, W€– cyst wall.
Scale bars 20 µm. With permission from Foissner (2003) and Foissner and Stoeck (2009).
dispersal of protists
Figs 5.20, 5.21 Sorogena stoianovitchae from life (20) and in the scanning electron
microscope (21). 20:€Right side overview of a trophont, showing the dome-shaped oral
entrance (OA). 21:€Uniquely, S. stoianovitchae develops aerial sorocarps, quite similar
to those of slime moulds. Scale bars 30 µm (20) and 200 µm (21). With permission from
Bardele et al. (1991) and Olive and Blanton (1980).
and Blanton, 1980; Sugimoto and Endoh, 2008):€ aggregation, compact aggregation, secretion of a mucous matrix, stalk elongation and completion of the fruiting
body. When S. stoianovitchae is mildly starved, several hundreds of cells aggregate
beneath the water surface, and the aggregate develops into an aerial fruiting body,
in which the individual cells encyst, forming a very thin wall (Blanton and Olive,
1983). Essential requirements for fruiting body development are high cell density,
a light–dark cycle, and a dark period of more than 8 consecutive hours. In addition, the initial aggregation begins during the night and sunrise (light) triggers
the subsequent development. The stalk of the sorocarp is composed of a matrix
of complex protein-polysaccharide molecules (Blanton et al., 1983). Recently,
Sugimoto and Endoh (2008) analysed the genes involved in fruiting body development. A€BLASTX search revealed that sequences with high identity for extracellular proteins (mucin, proteophosphoglycan) or membrane proteins are likely
candidates for aggregating material, mucous matrix and stalk material.
73
74
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Table 5.2 State of 100 protargol-impregnated Meseres corlissi specimens from an
exponentially growing culture.
State of specimens
Proportion (%)
Ordinary specimens
40
Ordinary dividing specimens
6
Dividing specimens with cyst wall precursors
2
Specimens with cyst wall precursors
23
Specimens with few food vacuoles
17
Specimens with few food vacuoles and with cyst wall precursors
12
5.4.4╇ Meseres corlissi and Halteria grandinella (oligotrichs)
Meseres (Figs 5.22–27) and Halteria (Figs 5.28–5.29) are closely related morphologically (Petz and Foissner, 1992) and genetically (Katz et al., 2005). This is sustained by their resting cysts, especially the occurrence and fine structure of the
lepidosomes (extracellular, organic structures produced intracellularly by trophic
and/or cystic protist species; Foissner et al., 2005). Further, the cysts share a considerable overall similarity, that is, the wall is composed of five layers with similar
fine structure (Foissner et al., 2007).
However, there are also conspicuous differences:€(i) the lepidosomes are spherical in Meseres (Figs 5.24–5.26), while conical in Halteria (Fig 5.29); (ii) the lepidosomes of Meseres are located in a slimy ‘basal layer’ (Fig 5.26), while those
of Halteria, which lacks a basal layer, are attached to the ectocyst; (iii) Meseres
has a bright (non-osmiophilic) zone between mesocyst and endocyst (Fig 5.27),
while both are close together in Halteria (Foissner et al., 2007); (iv) Halteria lacks
the chitin present in Meseres, which is unexpected considering the close morphologic and genetic relationship; (v) Meseres has five complex types of cyst wall
precursors (Foissner and Pichler, 2006), while Halteria has possibly only three
or four because it lacks the basal layer and the bright zone between mesocyst
and endocyst (see items ii and iii); (vi) The ‘curious structures’, very likely reserve
bodies produced by the autophagous vacuoles, have a different shape (Foissner,
2005; Foissner et al., 2007); and (vii) in contrast to Halteria, Meseres produces part
of the cyst wall precursors in the morphostatic condition and even in dividing
specimens (Table 5.2, Fig 5.23). This ability, which I term ‘precursor stocking’,
may explain why Meseres is able to encyst within one hour, in spite of the complexity of the process (Foissner and Pichler, 2006). Precursor stocking is possibly
more common than recognised, i.e. I observed it also in some haptorid ciliates
(Foissner, unpublished).
dispersal of protists
Figs 5.22–5.25 Meseres corlissi in the scanning electron microscope (22, 24, 25) and
after silver (protargol) impregnation (23). 22:€Ventral overview, showing the conspicuous
adoral zone of membranelles (AZM) and widely spaced somatic ciliary rows consisting
of stiff bristles (BR). 23:€A morphostatic cell, as recognisable by the adoral zone of
membranelles (AZM), which has numerous cyst wall precursors in the cytoplasm
(arrowheads), including fully developed lepidosomes (see next figures). This phenomen
is called ‘precursor stocking’. 24, 25:€The globular resting cyst is covered by about 200
spherical lepidosomes, i.e. organic scales produced by the Golgi apparatus and present
also in 23% of non-encysting specimens (Table 5.2; Fig 5.23, precursor stocking). The
lepidosomes have an average diameter of 6â•›µ m and have a reticular wall (25). Scale bars
5â•›µ m (25), 20 µm (24), and 30 µm (22, 23). With permission from Petz and Foissner (1992),
Foissner et al. (2005) and Foissner and Pichler (2006).
75
76
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Figs 5.26–5.29 Meseres corlissi (26, 27) and Halteria grandinella (28, 29) in the
transmission (26, 27) and scanning (28, 29) electron microscope. See also Figs 5.22–5.25.
26, 27:€Meseres corlissi has a complex cyst wall, consisting of (from outside to inside)
lepidosomes (L) embedded in a slimy matrix (M), a basal layer (BL), a microfibrillar
layer (F), an ectocyst (EC), an ectomesocyst (EM), an endomesocyst (NM), an endocyst
(EN) and a metacyst (ME). The cortex (C) of the ciliate is maintained. 28:€Left side view
with end of adoral zone of membranelles (AZM) marked by an arrowhead. Note the long
jumping bristles. 29:€Like Meseres, Halteria has lepidosomes on the surface of the resting
cyst. However, the lepidosomes are globular in Meseres, while conical in Halteria. Scale
bars 1â•›µ m (27), 15â•›µ m (28, 29), and 20 µm (26). With permission from Foissner (2005) and
Foissner et al. (2007).
dispersal of protists
The differences in the cyst structure of Meseres and Halteria, especially the
complex lepidosomes and the presence of a chitin layer in the former, might at
least partially explain their different ecology. Although both are cosmopolitan
(Katz et al., 2005; Weisse et al., 2008), Meseres is very rare and possibly restricted to
ephemeral freshwater habitats, while Halteria is one of the most common ciliates
occurring in a wide variety of ephemeral and permanent limnetic environments
(Foissner et al., 1991; Weisse et al., 2008).
As an inhabitant of ephemeral habitats, Meseres needs a ‘stronger’ cyst wall than
Halteria. Indeed, the wall is twice as thick (1241â•›nm vs. 660â•›nm) and has a higher
complexity (see above). While the chemical composition and the function of the
lepidosomes, whose genesis and release takes a lot of energy, is still obscure, the
chitin layer might be helpful in protecting the cell from mechanical and water
stress as well as from bacterial decomposition because chitin is a very resistant
matter. Finally, precursor stocking is an excellent way to use even short periods of
good environmental conditions.
5.4.5╇ Strombidium oculatum (oligotrichs)
Strombidium oculatum is a tide-pool ciliate and an impressive example of circatidal encystment, first described by Fauré-Fremiet (1948) and later studied in detail
by Jonsson (1994) and Montagnes et al. (2002). The ciliate, which has an obconical
shape and is about 80â•›×â•›40 µm in size (Fig 5.30), is possibly restricted to the northern hemisphere (Agatha, S., pers. comm.). Usually, it is green due to sequestered
chloroplasts and has a distinct, red eyespot composed of stigma obtained from
chlorophyte prey. The cysts are flattened spheres, about 50â•›µ m in diameter, and
in the middle of the top surface there is a 10â•›µ m-wide escape opening closed with
a spumiform plug (Fig 5.31; Jonsson, 1994; Montagnes et al., 2002). Unfortunately,
the fine structure and chemical composition of the cyst wall and the plug have not
yet been investigated.
The circatidal behaviour runs as follows (Fig 5.32, Jonsson, 1994; Montagnes
et€al., 2002):€for about 6 h, at low tide, S. oculatum is free-swimming in pools, and
about 20–60 min before flushing of the pools it encysts on a substrate. Encystment
lasts for about 19 h:€ two high tides and one intervening low tide. Excystment
then occurs the next day about 30–40 min after the pools are isolated. Cells divide almost immediately after excysting, allowing the ciliate population to rapidly
exploit potential food resources. Experiments and field observations revealed that
S. oculatum responds phototaxically and exhibits seasonal trends in population
dynamics with very low abundances in winter.
5.4.6╇ Odontochlamys spp. (Chilodonellidae)
These are small (~50 µm), bacterivorous ciliates living in terrestrial and limnetic
habitats (Fig 5.33). They are remarkable in having the ability to change within a few
77
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
I
C
I
I
C
C
day
night
0.5
Abundance (per ml)
78
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
14
16
18
20
22
0
2
4
6
8 10
Time of day (h)
12
14
16
18
20
22
32
Figs 5.30–5.32 Strombidium oculatum in the scanning electron microscope. 30:€Lateral
overview, showing the conspicuous adoral zone of membranelles (AZM) and the
girdle ciliary row (G). 31:€Resting cysts are closed by a fibrous lid (arrowhead). When
excysting, the lid disappears (arrow). 32:€Field observations of the change in abundance
of Strombidium oculatum over the day–night cycle in three replicate tide pools (■, ●,€▲)
over ~3 low and ~3 high tides. The solid line is the mean abundance of ciliates in the
three pools. Vertical lines represent when pools were isolated by the outgoing tide (I)
and covered by the incoming tide (C). Days and nights were delineated by sunrise and
sunset. Scale bars 15â•›µ m (31) and 25â•›µ m (30). With permission from Jonsson (1994) and
Montagnes et al. (2002).
dispersal of protists
Figs 5.33–5.36 Odontochlamys spp. can encyst within 10 min. 33:€Ventral view of a
trophic specimen, showing the oral basket (OB) and the right and left ciliary field (LF, RF).
34:€When encystment commences, the cell rounds up and the dorsal side begins to vault
over the ventral one. 35:€Middle stage, showing that the dorsal side (margin marked by
arrowheads) vaulted over most of the ventral side. 36:€Young resting cyst without distinct
wall, showing the macronucleus (MA). Scale bars 25 µm. With permission from Blatterer
and Foissner (1992) (33–35) and original (36).
minutes from the active into the cystic state. Thus, encystment can be observed
under the microscope (Figs 5.34–5.36). For details, see figure captions.
Obviously, fast encystment is a strategy very helpful in ephemeral habitats, such
as moss, leaf litter and small ponds, where these ciliates usually occur. Looking at
79
80
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
the examples provided in this brief review, it becomes obvious that ciliates evolved
several quite different strategies to survive in ephemeral habitats. It is likely that
many more wait to be discovered.
5.5╇ Dispersal by humans
Biogeographic changes due to human activities have been largely ignored in the
discussion of protist distribution, although a number of examples have been well
known for a long time. For example, several tropical and Indopacific species of
foraminifera entered the Mediterranean Sea via the Suez Canal (Lesseps’ immigrants) and tropical aquaria. Moreover, it is likely that certain toxic dinoflagellates spread by human activities (Hallegraeff and Bolch, 1992). In rotifers, many of
which have a similar size as ciliates, Brachionus havanaensis and Keratella americana have been introduced to southeast Asia by human activities (Segers, 2001).
On the other hand, alpine zooplankton richness and genetic diversity have been
only slightly influenced by anthropogenic stress and fish introduction, possibly
due to the ability to produce long-lived resting stages withstanding unfavourable
conditions (Winder et al., 2001).
Shipping (ballast water), the transport of goods and the construction of canals
are three major reasons for the artificial dispersal of protists. Millions of tonnes of
water and many thousands of tonnes of soil are transported across the world each
year. Hallegraeff and Bolch (1992) and Hülsmann and Galil (2002) suppose that
since the introduction of water as ballast in the middle of the nineteenth century,
many protists may have spread globally, unheeded by protozoologists. The diatoms
Odontella sinensis and Coscinodiscus wailesii entered the North Sea and the Baltic
Sea rather recently, together with their parasites (Kühn, 1997; Hülsmann and Galil,
2002). Likewise, Lagenophrys cochinensis, an ectosymbiotic ciliate of wood-boring,
marine isopods, has probably been transported from New Zealand to California
in wooden ship hulls rather recently (Clamp, 2003), while the coccolithophore
Emiliania huxleyi invaded the Black Sea about 1500 years ago (Winter et al., 1994).
Elliott (1973) proposed that a species of the Tetrahymena pyriformis complex entered
the Pacific Islands when man migrated westward from South and perhaps Central
America. The same might have happened more recently with Paramecium quadecaurelia, a member of the P. aurelia sibling species complex. This species, which
was known only from Australia, was recently reported from a pond of the city of
Windhoek, the capital of Namibia (Przybós et al., 2003). Dispersal by ship’s ballast
water might also be responsible for the occurrence of four euryhaline psammobiontic (obligate sand-dwelling) testate amoeba species in the Great Lakes, Canada
(Nicholls and MacIsaac, 2004), while marine dinoflagellates possibly cannot establish viable populations in these lakes (Fahnenstiel et al., 2009).
dispersal of protists
Another impressive example is the appearance of Hydrodictyon in New Zealand
where this very distinctive alga had never been seen before. It was found in a pond
belonging to a hatchery supplying fish and aquatic plants to aquarists. Obviously,
Hydrodictyon had been imported together with fish or aquatic plants from East
Asia (Kristiansen, 1996).
Freshwater diatoms show several impressive examples of human-mediated
introductions. They have been reviewed by Vanormelingen et al. (2008), whose
text I quote here:€‘Asterionella formosa is a widespread planktonic morphospecies
and is frequently considered to be cosmopolitan; it is often seasonally dominant
in eutrophic lakes. Detailed analysis of fossil material from 21 sediment cores (14
lakes) from New Zealand showed no trace of A. formosa in pre-European sediments, although it is now widespread, occurring in 45% of lakes for which phytoplankton records are available. The most likely vector for the introduction of A.
formosa is the introduction of salmon ova into New Zealand lakes in the second
half of the nineteenth century (Harper, 1994). It is highly unlikely that the species was extremely (i.e. not detectably) rare before European settlement as it is
a species that can occur across a wide range of environmental conditions, from
oligo- to eutrophic (Harper, 1994; Van Dam et al., 1994). Interestingly, A. formosa
is also absent from other lake cores in Australasia, which might rule out environmental change due to the introduction of mammalian grazers as a cause for its
sudden appearance. The recent spread in New Zealand of another exotic diatom,
Didymosphenia geminata (Kilroy et al., 2007), is occurring long after the main
human-induced environmental changes. Other convincing evidence for human
mediated introduction of species (and hence previous dispersal limitation) among
diatoms include the appearance of Thalassiosira baltica in the Laurentian Great
Lakes (Edlund et al., 2000), and the North-American species Gomphoneis minuta
and Encyonema triangulum in France (Coste and Ector, 2000).’
Wilkinson (2010) admonishes me for the lack of examples of human introductions in soil. There are none, unfortunately! And Wilkinson (2010) also did not
provide any. However, he provided a solid discussion of soil introductions, some
anecdotal evidence, and several suggestions to overcome the methodological
problems which, indeed, are much more serious than in limnetic and marine
environments.
5.6╇ Conclusions
Protist distribution is best described with the moderate endemicity model. But little information is available on the reasons why certain species are cosmopolitan
and others are not. I argue that the break of Pangaea into Laurasia and Gondwana,
the structure and physiology of the resting cysts, and human introductions are
81
82
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Table 5.3 Percentages of dispersal routes of protists. Based on the calculation of Foissner
(2008) that one-third of ciliates possibly have restricted distribution.
Dispersal routes
Amount (%)
Cosmopolitan distribution due to step-by-step dispersal and
human introductions
35
Cosmopolitan distribution due to geological processes,
euryoecious lifestyle and others
30
Restricted distribution due to morphological and physiological
peculiarities of the resting cysts, break-up of Pangaea and
insufficient time to disperse in young species
35
the most important factors for the dispersal of species (cosmopolitan or restricted
distribution) and for their presence/absence in a certain habitat, at a certain time,
and under certain environmental conditions. The same morphospecies may
have different resting cysts, depending on the habitat in which the trophic cells
live. Thus, long-range dispersal by air currents or animal vectors will not pro�
duce viable populations, for instance, ciliate species which evolved in rain forests
will very likely not survive in Central Europe because their ‘weak’ cysts die during transport or do not withstand the different climate. This is substantiated by a
comparative analysis of desiccation resistance of ciliate cysts from Namibia and
rain forests in Borneo and the Malay Peninsula. Then, I present seven examples
from ciliate resting cysts, showing their overwhelming morphological and physiological diversity, for instance, precursor stocking in Meseres corlissi, a glass cover in
Maryna umbrellata and the circatidal cyst production of Strombidium oculatum.
Step-by-step distribution and human introductions possibly also play a considerable role in the dispersal of species, especially at local, regional and continental
scales. Several examples are provided. Table 5.3 shows rather speculative percentages on the contribution of several dispersal routes.
Acknowledgements
Financial support was provided by the Austrian Science Foundation (FWF,
projects P20360-B17 and P19699-B17). The technical assistance of Mag. Barbara
Harl is greatly acknowledged.
References
Bass, D., Richards, T.A., Matthai, L.,
Marsh, V., Cavalier-Smith, T. (2007).
DNA evidence for global dispersal
and probable endemicity of
protozoa. BMC Evolutionary Biology
7, 162.
dispersal of protists
Bardele, C.F., Foissner, W., Blanton, R.L.
(1991). Morphology, morphogenesis
and systematic position of the sorocarp
forming ciliate Sorogena stoianovitchae
Bradbury and Olive, 1980. Journal of
Protozoology 38, 7–17.
Blanton, R.L., Olive, L.S. (1983).
Ultrastructure of aerial stalk formation
by the ciliated protozoan Sorogena
stoianovitchae. Protoplasma 116,
125–135.
Blanton, R.L., Warner, S.A., Olive, L.S.
(1983). The structure and composition
of the stalk of the ciliated protozoan
Sorogena stoianovitchae. Journal of
Protozoology 30, 617–624.
Blatterer, H., Foissner, W. (1992).
Morphology and infraciliature of
some cyrtophorid ciliates (Protozoa,
Ciliophora) from freshwater and
soil. Archiv für Protistenkunde 142,
101–118.
Bradbury, P.C., Olive, L.S. (1980). Fine
structure of the feeding stage
of a sorogenic ciliate, Sorogena
stoianovitchae gen. n., sp. n. Journal of
Protozoology 27, 267–277.
Caron, D.A. (2009). Past president’s
address:€protistan biogeography:€why
all the fuss? Journal of Eukaryotic
Microbiology 56, 105–112.
Chao, A., Li, P.C., Agatha, S., Foissner,€W.
(2006). A statistical approach to
estimate soil ciliate diversity and
distribution based on data from five
continents. Oikos 114, 479–493.
Clamp, J.C. (2003). Ecology and
geographic variation in Lagenophrys
cochinensis (Ciliophora, Peritricha,
Lagenophryidae), a widely distributed
ectosymbiont of wood-boring,
marine isopods. Journal of Eukaryotic
Microbiology 50, Abstract 82.
Corliss, J.O., Esser, S.C. (1974). Comments
on the role of the cyst in the life
cycle and survival of free-living
protozoa. Transactions of the American
Microscopical Society 93, 578–593.
Coste, M., Ector, L. (2000). Diatomées
invasives exotiques ou rares en
France:€principales observations
effectuées au cours des dernières
décennies. Systematics and Geography
of Plants 70, 373–400.
Cowling, A.J. (1994). Protozoan
distribution and adaptation. In
Darbyshire, J.F. (ed.), Soil Protozoa, pp.
5–42. Wallingford:€CAB International.
Darling, K.F., Wade, C.M. (2008).
The genetic diversity of planktic
foraminifera and the global distribution
of ribosomal RNA genotypes. Marine
Micropaleontology 67, 216–238.
Dolan, J.R. (2005). An introduction to the
biogeography of aquatic microbes.
Aquatic Microbial Ecology 41, 39–48.
Edlund, M.B., Taylor, C.M., Schelske,
C.L. et al. (2000). Thalassiosira baltica
(Grunow) Ostenfeld (Bacillariophyta),
a new exotic species in the Great Lakes.
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and
Aquatic Sciences 57, 610–615.
Elliott, A.M. (1973). Life cycle and
distribution of Tetrahymena. In Elliott,
A.M. (ed.), Biology of Tetrahymena, pp.
259–268. Stroudsburg, PA:€Hutchinson
& Ross.
Epstein, S.S. (2009). Microbial awakenings.
Nature 457, 1083.
Fahnenstiel, G., Hong, Y., Millie, D., Doblin,
M., Johengen, T., Reid, D. (2009). Marine
dinoflagellate cysts in the ballast
tank sediments of ships entering the
Laurentian Great Lakes. Verhandlungen
der Internationalen Vereinigung für
Limnologie 30, 1035–1038.
Fauré-Fremiet, E. (1948). Le rythme de
marée du Strombidium oculatum
Gruber. Bulletin Biologique de la France
et de la Belgique 82, 3–23.
83
84
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Fenchel, T., Finlay, B.J. (2005).
Cosmopolitanism and microbes.
SILnews 44, 5.
Finlay, B.J. (2002). Global dispersal of freeliving microbial eukaryote species.
Science 296, 1061–1063.
Finlay, B.J., Esteban, G.F., Fenchel, T.
(2004). Protist diversity is different?
Protist 155, 15–22.
Foissner, W. (1987). Soil
protozoa:€fundamental problems,
ecological significance, adaptations in
ciliates and testaceans, bioindicators,
and guide to the literature. Progress in
Protistology 2, 69–212.
Foissner, W. (1993). Colpodea (Ciliophora).
Fischer, Stuttgart, Protozoenfauna 4,
I–X + 798 pp.
Foissner, W. (1998). An updated
compilation of world soil ciliates
(Protozoa, Ciliophora), with ecological
notes, new records, and descriptions
of new species. European Journal of
Protistology 34, 195–235.
Foissner, W. (1999). Protist
diversity:€estimates of the nearimponderable. Protist 150, 363–368.
Foissner, W. (2003). Pseudomaryna
australiensis nov. gen., nov. spec. and
Colpoda brasiliensis nov. spec., two
new colpodids (Ciliophora, Colpodea)
with a mineral envelope. European
Journal of Protistology 39, 199–212.
Foissner, W. (2004). Ubiquity and
cosmopolitanism of protists
questioned. SILnews 43, 6–7.
Foissner, W. (2005). The unusual,
lepidosome-coated resting cyst
of Meseres corlissi (Ciliophora:
Oligotrichea):€transmission electron
microscopy and phylogeny. Acta
Protozoologica 44, 217–230.
Foissner, W. (2006). Biogeography and
dispersal of micro-organisms:€a
review emphasizing protists. Acta
Protozoologica 45, 111–136.
Foissner, W. (2008). Protist diversity
and distribution:€some basic
considerations. Biodiversity and
Conservation 17, 235–242.
Foissner, W. (2009). The stunning, glasscovered resting cyst of Maryna
umbrellata (Ciliophora, Colpodea).
Acta Protozoologica 48, 223–243.
Foissner, W., Pichler, M. (2006). The
unusual, lepidosome-coated
resting cyst of Meseres corlissi
(Ciliophora:€Oligotrichea):€genesis of
four complex types of wall precursors
and assemblage of the cyst wall. Acta
Protozoologica 45, 339–366.
Foissner, W., Stoeck, T. (2009).
Morphological and molecular
characterization of a new protist
family, Sandmanniellidae n.
fam. (Ciliophora, Colpodea), with
description of Sandmanniella terricola
n. g., n. sp. from the Chobe floodplain
in Botswana. Journal of Eukaryotic
Microbiology 56, 472–483.
Foissner, W., Blatterer, H., Berger, H.,
Kohmann, F. (1991). Taxonomische
und ökologische Revision der
Ciliaten des Saprobiensystems€–
Band I:€Cyrtophorida, Oligotrichida,
Hypotrichia, Colpodea.
Informationsberichte des Bayerischen
Landesamtes für Wasserwirtschaft,
München 1/91, 478 pp.
Foissner, W., Agatha, S., Berger, H. (2002).
Soil ciliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora)
from Namibia (Southwest Africa),
with emphasis on two contrasting
environments, the Etosha region and
the Namib Desert. Denisia 5, 1–1459.
Foissner, W., Müller H., Weisse, T.
(2005). The unusual, lepidosomecoated resting cyst of Meseres corlissi
(Ciliophora, Oligotrichea):€light
dispersal of protists
and scanning electron microscopy,
cytochemistry. Acta Protozoologica 44,
201–215.
Foissner, W., Müller, H., Agatha, S. (2007).
A comparative fine structural and
phylogenetic analysis of resting cysts in
oligotrich and hypotrich Spirotrichea
(Ciliophora). European Journal of
Protistology 43, 295–314.
Foissner, W., Weissenbacher, B.,
Krautgartner, W.-D., Lütz-Meindl,
U. (2009). A cover of glass:€first
report of biomineralized silicon
in a ciliate, Maryna umbrellata
(Ciliophora:€Colpodea). Journal of
Eukaryotic Microbiology 56, 519–530.
Green, J., Bohannan, B.J.M. (2006). Spatial
scaling of microbial biodiversity. Trends
in Ecology and Evolution 21, 501–507.
Gutiérrez, J.C., Walker, G.K. (1983).
Cystology:€a new area in protozoology.
Proceedings of the 5th European
Conference on Ciliate Biology, Geneva
(unpaged abstract).
Gutiérrez, J.C., Martin-González, A.
(2002). Ciliate encystment-excystment
cycle:€A response to environmental
stress. In Gutiérrez, J.C. (ed.), Microbial
Development Under Environmental
Stress, pp. 29–49. Research Signpost
37/611 (2), Fort P.O., Trivandrum-695
023, Kerala, India.
Gutiérrez, J.C., Díaz, S., Ortega, R., MartínGonzález, A. (2003). Ciliate resting cyst
walls:€a comparative review. Recent
Research Developments in Microbiology
7, 361–379.
Hallegraeff, G., Bolch, C.J. (1992).
Transport of diatom and dinoflagellate
resting spores in ships’ ballast
water:€implications for plankton
biogeography and aquaculture. Journal
of Plankton Research 14, 1067–1084.
Hamilton, W.D., Lenton, T.M. (1998). Spora
and gaia:€how microbes fly with their
clouds. Ethology Ecology and Evolution
10, 1–16.
Harper, M.A. (1994). Did Europeans
introduce Asterionella formosa Hassall
to New Zealand? In Kociolek, J.P. (ed.),
Proceedings of the 11th International
Diatom Symposium 1990, pp. 479–484.
San Francisco, CA:€California Academy
of Sciences.
Hülsmann, N., Galil, B.S. (2002). Protists€–
a dominant component of the ballasttransported biota. In Leppäkoski, E.
et al. (eds.), Invasive Aquatic Species of
Europe, pp. 20–26. Dordrecht:€Kluwer
Academic.
Jonsson, P.R. (1994). Tidal rhythm of
cyst formation in the rock pool
ciliate Strombidium oculatum
Gruber (Ciliophora, Oligotrichida):€a
description of the functional
biology and an analysis of the tidal
synchronization of encystment.
Journal of Experimental Marine Biology
and Ecology 175, 77–103.
Katz, L.A., McManus, G.B., SnoeyenbosWest, L.O. et al. (2005). Reframing
the “everything is everywhere“
debate:€evidence for high gene
flow and diversity in ciliate
morphospecies. Aquatic Microbial
Ecology 41, 55–65.
Kilroy, C., Biggs, B.J., Vieglais, C.C.
(2007). Didymosphenia geminata in
New Zealand:€a science response to
help manage an unwanted, invasive
freshwater diatom. Abstract book,
ASLO Aquatic Sciences meeting. Santa
Fe (New Mexico), 4–9/02/2007.
Kristiansen, J. (1996). Dispersal
of freshwater algae€– a review.
Hydrobiologia 336, 151–157.
Kühn, S.F. (1997). Victoriniella multiformis,
gen. et spec. nov. (incerta sedis),
a polymorphic parasitoid protist
infecting the marine diatom
85
86
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Coscinodiscus wailesii Gran and Angst
(North Sea, German Bight). Archiv für
Protistenkunde 148, 115–123.
Maguire, B., Jr. (1963). The passive
dispersal of small aquatic organisms
and their colonization of isolated
bodies of water. Ecological Monographs
33, 161–185.
Maguire, B., Jr. (1971). Community
structure of protozoans and algae
with particular emphasis on recently
colonized bodies of water. In Cairns,€J.,
Jr. (ed.), The Structure and Function of
Fresh-water Microbial Communities,
pp. 121–149. Research Division
Monograph 3, Virginia Polytechnic
Institute and State University,
Blacksburg, Virginia 24061.
Martiny, J.B.H., Bohannan, B.J.M.,
Brown, J.H. et al. (2006). Microbial
biogeography:€putting microorganisms
on the map. Nature 4, 102–112.
Meier-Tackmann, D. (1982).
Untersuchungen über die
physiologische Funktion der
Cystenhülle und die Resistenz
der dünnwandigen Dauercysten
von Colpoda cucullus O.F. Müller
(Holotricha, Ciliata). Zoologischer
Anzeiger 208, 1–29.
Meier-Tackmann, D., Wenzel, F. (1988).
Daten über Wettergeschehen und
Reaktivierbarkeit der Dauercysten
von Colpoda cucullus O.F. Müller
(Holotricha, Ciliata). Zoologischer
Anzeiger 220, 277–290.
Meisterfeld, R. (1997). Thekamöben€– ihr
Potential für Ökosystemforschung
und Bioindikation. Abhandlungen
und Berichte der Gesellschaft für
Naturkunde, Görlitz 69, 87–95.
Meyer, E., Foissner, W., Aescht, E. (1989).
Vielfalt und Leistung der Tiere
im Waldboden. Österreichische
Forstzeitung 3, 15–18.
Montagnes, D.J.S., Wilson, D., Brooks,
S.J., Lowe, C., Campey, M. (2002).
Cyclical behaviour of the tide-pool
ciliate Stombidium oculatum. Aquatic
Microbial Ecology 28, 55–68.
Müller, H., Foissner, W., Weisse, T. (2006).
Role of soil in the life cycle of Meseres
corlissi (Ciliophora:€Oligotrichea):
experiments with two clonal strains
from the type locality, an astatic
meadow pond. Aquatic Microbial
Ecology 42, 199–208.
Nicholls, K.H., MacIsaac, H.J. (2004).
Euryhaline, sand-dwelling testate
rhizopods in the Great Lakes. Journal
of Great Lakes Research 30, 123–132.
Nilsson, J.R. (2005). Ethanol affects
endocytosis and proliferation
of Tetrahymena pyriformis GL
and promotes encystment. Acta
Protozoologica 44, 293–299.
Olive, L.S., Blanton, R.L. (1980).
Aerial sorocarp development by
the aggregative ciliate, Sorogena
stoianovitchae. Journal of Protozoology
27, 293–299.
Pawlowski, J., Holzman, M. (2008).
Diversity and geographic distribution
of benthic foraminifera:€a molecular
perspective. Biodiversity and
Conservation 17, 317–328.
Petz, W., Foissner, W. (1992). Morphology
and morphogenesis of Strobilidium
caudatum (Fromentel) Meseres corlissi
n. sp., Halteria grandinella (Müller),
and Strombidium rehwaldi n. sp.,
and a proposed phylogenetic system
for oligotrich ciliates (Protozoa,
Ciliophora). Journal of Protozoology 39,
159–176.
Przybós, E., Hori, M., Fokin, S.I. (2003).
Strains of Paramecium quadecaurelia
from Namibia, Africa; genetic and
molecular studies. Acta Protozoologica
42, 357–360.
dispersal of protists
Segers, H. (2001). Zoogeography of
the Southeast Asian Rotifera.
Hydrobiologia 446/447, 233–246.
Smith, H.G., Bobrov, A., Lara, E. (2008).
Diversity and biogeography of
testate amoebae. Biodiversity and
Conservation 17, 329–343.
Sugimoto, H., Endoh, H. (2008).
Differentially expressed genes
during fruiting body development
in the aggregative ciliate Sorogena
stoianovitchae (Ciliophora:€Colpodea).
Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 55,
110–116.
Taylor, J.W., Turner, E., Townsend, J.P.,
Dettman, J.R., Jacobson, D. (2006).
Eukaryotic microbes, species
recognition and the geographic limits
of species:€examples from the kingdom
Fungi. Philosophical Transactions of the
Royal Society B 361, 1947–1963.
Tyler, P.A. (1996). Endemism in freshwater
algae with special reference to the
Australian region. Hydrobiologia 336,
1–9.
Van Dam, H., Mertens, A., Sinkeldam,
J. (1994). A coded checklist and
ecological indicator values of
freshwater diatoms from The
Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of
Aquatic Ecology 28, 117–133.
Vanormelingen, P., Verleyen, E., Vyverman,
W. (2008). The diversity and distribution
of diatoms:€f rom cosmopolitanism to
narrow endemism. Biodiversity and
Conservation 17, 393–405.
Wanner, M., Dunger, W. (2001). Biological
activity of soils from reclaimed opencast coal mining areas in Upper Lusatia
using testate amoebae (protists) as
indicators. Ecological Engineering 17,
323–330.
Weisse, T., Strüder-Kypke, C., Berger,€H.,
Foissner, W. (2008). Genetic,
morphological, and ecological
diversity of spatially separated clones
of Meseres corlissi Petz & Foissner,
1992 (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea).
Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 55,
257–270.
Webster, J. (1983). Pilze. Eine Einführung.
Berlin:€Springer.
Wichterman, R. (1986). The Biology of
Paramecium, 2nd Edition. New
York:€Plenum Press.
Wilkinson, D.M. (2001). What is the upper
size limit for cosmopolitan distribution
in free-living microorganisms? Journal
of Biogeography 28, 285–291.
Wilkinson, D.M. (2010). Have we
underestimated the importance of
humans in the biogeography of freeliving terrestrial microorganisms?
Journal of Biogeography 37, 393–397.
Winder, M., Monaghan, M.T., Spaak, P.
(2001). Have human impacts changed
alpine zooplankton diversity over the
past 100 years? Arctic, Antarctic, and
Alpine Research 33, 467–475.
Winter, A., Jordan, R.W., Roth, P.H. (1994).
Biogeography of living coccolithophores
in ocean waters. In Winter, A., Siesser,
W.G. (eds.), Coccolithophores, pp. 161–
177. Cambridge:€Cambridge University
Press.
Yang, S.H., Lee, K.-B., Kong, B., Kim,
J.-H., Kim, H.-S., Choi, I.S. (2009).
Biomimetic encapsulation of
individual cells with silica. Angewandte
Chemie 121, 9324–9327.
87
6
Everything is everywhere:€a twenty-first
century de-/reconstruction with respect
to protists
David Bass1 and Jens Boenigk 2
╇ Zoology Department, The Natural History Museum, London, UK
╇ General Botany, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
1
2
6.1╇ Introduction
The aphorism ‘Everything is everywhere, but the environment selects’ asserts that
microbial taxa are found anywhere on earth that there is suitable habitat for them.
It was crystallised in this form by Baas Becking (1934), who was in turn inspired
by the ideas of Beijerinck (1913). The history of its establishment has been nicely
summarised by O’Malley (2007) and its incorporation into contemporary thought
described by de Wit and Bouvier (2006). It was further contextualised in terms of
free-living protists by Fenchel and Finlay (2004). This concept (which we refer to
hereafter as EiE) has recently been the focus of much heated debate in microbiology
and protistology. This chapter will reassess the fundamental principles behind the
EiE concept with respect to free-living protists in the light of recent findings and
insights from twenty-first century molecular biology and microbial ecology. We
do not intend to provide a survey of studies/taxa that apparently do or do not meet
Biogeography of Microscopic Organisms: Is Everything Small Everywhere?, ed. Diego Fontaneto.
Published by Cambridge University Press. © The Systematics Association 2011.
e i e : € a t w e n t y - f i r s t c e n t u r y d e -/ r e c o n s t r u c t i o n
its predictions; work in this field is proceeding rapidly and such a survey would
soon become obsolete. The studies cited here were not selected because we agree
or disagree particularly strongly with them, but because they illustrate points of
our discussion. At the time of writing the most sensible view is that protist distribution is not fundamentally different to that of other organisms€ – the apparent
differences being quantitative rather than qualitative€– and overall fits the ‘moderate endemicity model’ (Foissner, 1999, 2004a, 2006, 2008; Hughes Martiny et al.,
2006; Telford et al., 2006; Vyverman et al., 2007). Similar patterns and concepts
continue to be discussed in other microbial and small multicellular groups (e.g.
Finlay and Fenchel, 2004; Fierer, 2008). However, the means by which microbial
distributions and dispersal can be measured and understood are necessarily different from those relating to larger organisms for a range of reasons€– some more
obvious than others.
Some of the main proponents of EiE in the protist world have been Finlay and
colleagues (e.g. Finlay et al., 1996; Finlay, 2002; Fenchel and Finlay, 2004; Finlay
and Fenchel, 2004), who argue that microbial eukaryotes are ‘so abundant that
continuous large-scale dispersal sustains their global distribution’, and that
‘sheer weight of [their] numbers might be expected to drive large-scale dispersal
for purely statistical reasons’ (Finlay, 2002 and references therein). It is important to bear in mind that the original formulation of EiE and many subsequent
applications, including some contemporary ones, use morphology to define the
operational taxoxomic unit (OTU) under consideration€– i.e. the morphospecies
(Finlay et al., 1996). It is apparently true that many or most protist morphospecies are globally distributed. There are myriad examples, particularly in groups
of small, morphologically relatively characterless protists such as some flagellates and amoebae, but also in groups with more characters by which individual
lineages can be distinguished by light microscopy, for example those with hardened and complex external features as in silica-scaled taxa and ciliates (Finlay
et€al., 1996; Finlay and Clarke, 1999; Wylezich et al., 2007; Kristiansen, 2008), and
those with tests (Smith et al. 2008; Chapter 7). Conversely, there are some convincing examples of morphospecies with restricted distributions, particularly those
found in poorly studied regions but not in apparently highly suitable habitats in
much more intensively studied regions. Examples of this phenomenon have been
cited in many groups including unicellular green algae (Coesel and Krienitz,
2008), planktonic foraminifera (Darling and Wade, 2008), testate amoebae (with
particular reference to Apodera vas and Certesella spp., apparently occurring
only south of the Tropic of Cancer desert belt:€ Mitchell and Meisterfeld, 2005;
Smith and Wilkinson, 2007; Chapter 7), ciliates (Foissner et al., 2003; Foissner,
2004b; Stoeck et al., 2007a), diatoms (Vanormelingen et al., 2008) and chrysophytes (Kristiansen, 2008). However, the possibility cannot be ruled out that
more intensive sampling, perhaps using different techniques, will prove at least
89
90
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
some of these organisms to be more widely dispersed in viable form (even if they
do not subsequently grow) and/or that some of these cases will prove to be driven
by as yet unrecognised ecological factors.
A new set of opportunities and challenges for the EiE concept is coming from
recent great advances in molecular biology€– the increasing ease of probing environments using PCR primers at various levels of taxonomic specificity and obtaining sequence data which can be taxonomically assigned to protist groups and
directly compared across sampling sites. The most striking outcome of studies
using these techniques is that the molecular diversity of protists is much higher
than that of plants and metazoa (e.g. Moreira and López-García, 2002; Berney et
al., 2004; Cavalier-Smith, 2004; Guillou et al., 2004; Countway et al., 2005; Slapeta
et al., 2005; Worden, 2006), and much greater than suggested by their morphological diversity as observed by light microscopy, even taking into account statistical extrapolations of morphospecies diversity from large, globally distributed
data€sets such as that for ciliates by Chao et al. (2006). Furthermore, many€– if not
all€– protist morphospecies comprise many distinct lineages differing in ecological,
physiological, behavioural, ultrastructural and/or other traits (e.g. Nanney et al.,
1998; Habura et al., 2004; von der Heyden et al., 2004; Boenigk et al., 2005, 2006,
2007; Koch and Ekelund, 2005; Lowe et al., 2005; Slapeta et al., 2005,€ 2006;€ von
der Heyden and Cavalier-Smith, 2005; Finlay et al., 2006; Stoeck et al., 2006;
Scheckenbach et al., 2006; Bass et al., 2007, 2009a, 2009b, 2009c; Lilly et al., 2007;
Hoef-Emden, 2007, 2008; Boenigk, 2008a, 2008b; Darling and Wade, 2008; Simon
et al., 2008; Howe et€al., 2009).
The most frequently used marker to measure this diversity is the small subunit
rRNA gene (SSU rDNA) (Mindell and Honeycutt, 1990; Wuyts et al., 2000), which
is generally well suited to this purpose:€ it is very strongly represented in online
databases so provides a robust context for taxonomic assignation and phylogenetic analyses of newly obtained sequences, it is present in the genome in multiple
copies so is relatively easy to detect even when cell numbers are low, and it is of
sufficient length and encompasses a wide enough range of evolutionary rates for it
to be an unusually good single gene for phylogenetic analyses. Therefore it is used
as both an ecological, taxonomic and phylogenetic marker. Its use in the first two
capacities has been criticised on the grounds that there is no direct link between
variation in the SSU and species or ecotype boundaries; i.e. rDNA divergence is
not the direct result of selective forces relevant to species or ecotype divergence.
Such criticisms miss the point of marker genes, which simply offer ‘calibration
points’ or ‘barcodes’ with which other biological information can be associated
(biological species boundaries, ecotypes, phenotypic differences, etc.), and on the
basis of which taxonomic unit differences can be categorised.
We will now examine the components of the EiE statement individually and in
a contemporary context. We identify three key issues/considerations that must be
e i e : € a t w e n t y - f i r s t c e n t u r y d e -/ r e c o n s t r u c t i o n
addressed when assessing the biogeographic status of protists:€(1) distinguishing
between biogeographic patterns with ecological and historical bases; (2) determining an appropriate level of phylogenetic resolution at which to define taxonomic units that will be considered as potentially cosmopolitan or endemic; and
(3) the implications of the term ‘everywhere’ in the EiE statement and the limitations of comprehensive sampling by both morphological and molecular survey
methods.
6.2╇ The crucial but potentially elusive distinction
between historical and ecological biogeography
EiE applies to biogeographic structures as a result of historical processes, not ecological tolerance/preference. This is emphasised by de Wit and Bouvier (2006),
who point out that the Dutch ‘maar’ (‘but’) linking the two clauses ‘everything is
everywhere’ and ‘the environment selects’ implies that there is potential conflict
between them. EiE can be paraphrased by saying that protist taxa are dispersed
globally, but only grow where conditions are suitable for them. Elsewhere they may
be present in dormant forms or may be absent because they are unable to colonise
and/or grow and have subsequently disappeared. They may or may not be detectable in non-suitable habitats by enrichment culturing (Finlay, 2002; Smirnov, 2003)
and/or molecular techniques (see below). The only scenarios that would contradict the EiE assertion is (1) if a particular taxon had never reached some parts of
the world because its members were in some way physically restricted from doing
so, or (2) because the dispersal process took so long that the lineage had split into
daughter lineages before the ‘parent’ taxon could achieve a cosmopolitan distribution, or (3) because dispersal necessarily takes so long without intervening suitable habitat that cells are unable to survive the journey in viable form. Otherwise,
as long as individuals of a particular lineage are dispersed globally, whether they
then grow or not (as long as they have the potential to do so), they can be said to
have cosmopolitan distributions. This is a crucial distinction, and one that is often
overlooked or misinterpreted by studies that claim restricted distributions for taxa
in the sense that they provide evidence against EiE.
Therefore, the term ‘ecological biogeography’ describes only whether (or to
what extent) a lineage proliferates at a particular site/region according to the
suitability of conditions in that region, whereas ‘historical biogeography’ refers
to where on earth lineages have reached or been transported to. The difference
between these two concepts spotlights a crucial distinction between protist
dispersal (and the ways and extent to which it can be detected) and that of many
larger organisms. In most (all?) environments there exists a ‘seedbank’ of dormant protists, members of which can become active when conditions change
91
92
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
to suit them. This seedbank probably at least partly explains the very long rank
abundance tail of rare protist genotypes detected in both classical clone library
and next generation sequencing (NGS) environmental diversity studies€ – as
described in sections 4 and 5. (Such long tails also comprise lineages that may
never be able to grow because conditions are vanishingly unlikely to change
in their favour, and ‘rare’ sequences resulting from methodological errors and
intra-lineage sequence variation, which artefactually inflate estimates of the
diversity present.) This cryptic/dormant diversity is not present in organisms
with larger dispersal stages, which are more easily seen and identified and are
generally not able to persist in dormant forms for long or as indetectably. Such
larger organisms have disproportionally influenced classical biogeographic
theory; unlike protists, they have very small discrepancies between their potential (historically derived biogeographic range) and their realised (ecologically
derived) ranges.
Plants and fungi are closer to protists in this respect€– for example tropical tree
fruits/seeds can be transported transcontinentally with ocean currents and may
or may not become established, thus potentially expanding their true range. But
such seeds washed up on northern European shores are not likely or expected
to establish themselves; therefore it would be nonsense to say that their range
includes northern Europe. However, the massive (and mostly unknown) diversity
of protists and the difficulty of knowing whether they are active or not (or even
present) means that such judgements are much harder to make for members of
the microbial world. In plants with very small dispersal agents (e.g. orchid seeds)
and sporophore-forming fungi dispersal is likely to be easier and wider per spore/
seed than for tropical tree seeds, but because the lifecycle includes a conspicuous
multicellular stage the distinction from protists stands. (Note:€it is possible that
many such dispersal agents are as easily transported as some protists, but orchids
and many macro-fungi show strong historical biogeographic structuring. This is
not a real challenge to the ubiquitous dispersal theory for protists as numbers of
fungal and plant spores are many orders of magnitude lower than protist cells/
cysts on a global scale.) Therefore, as well as a lack of a significant cryptic seedbank of multicellular organisms there is also a conceptual disjunction between
the idea of ‘distribution range’ when applied to protists and multicells.
The relationship between geographic distance and ecological distance is far
from understood in respect to protists, and the two concepts are often conflated
in discussions of microbial biogeography, in many cases unavoidably as discussed
further in section 6.4. All claims of endemism should ideally be clearly qualified
by what the causes of such restricted ranges are, and the ecological conditions of
sampling and detection methods reported in such studies closely scrutinised to
ascertain whether an ecological explanation could in fact better explain a distribution pattern than a historical one. It is important that the cells are dispersed in
e i e : € a t w e n t y - f i r s t c e n t u r y d e -/ r e c o n s t r u c t i o n
a viable form, i.e. that they have the potential to grow and establish themselves
wherever they reach. If they do not grow following introduction because of local
conditions, including competitive exclusion from another strain, however closely
related, then an ecological, not historical, explanation is required. If parts of the
cell (for example an inorganic test or scale) are dispersed across greater distances
than the organism can survive then a misleading historically mediated biogeographic distribution may result.
The means by which dispersal can be effected to conform to EiE are effectively unlimited. Purists are likely to cite such ‘natural’ mechanisms such as wind
currents and precipitation and translocation by organismal vectors (internally
or externally), but human-mediated transport, incidentally as a result of human
travel around the globe by sea, land and air, and also deliberately (if such a
thing were to occur) are valid dispersal mechanisms under the terms of EiE (e.g.
Wilkinson, 2010).
6.3╇ Taxonomic units in protists and their relevance
to the EiE debate
What level of phylogenetic resolution is appropriate for defining species/operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in protists? By extension, what can/does EiE mean
by ‘everything’:€how do we define the ‘things’? It is increasingly apparent that this
level differs significantly among groups of organisms (because genetic marker and
trait evolution are not coupled). Thus it should be decided on a group-by-group
basis, integrating molecular phylogenetic, morphological (ideally including
ultrastructural), eco-physiological, functional and niche-inferred characteristics
to distinguish between biologically informative taxonomic units.
Boenigk (2008b) uses the ‘oldest’ nanoflagellate genus Monas Müller 1773 to provide a historically far-reaching analysis of classification problems that are unique
to or most pronounced in protists. These range from an initial uncertainty about
how protists are related to all other life (and indeed whether they arose by abiogenesis or spontaneous generation, which would pose a completely different set of
questions regarding biogeography!) to more modern concerns about reconstructing evolutionary histories, which is really only possible in protists using multigene molecular phylogenetics; a process that is not straightforward and in many
respects still unresolved. As stated above, one of the major findings of molecular
phylogenetics is that morphologically similar protists may be (and often are) unrelated:€organisms originally affiliated with Monas are now known to belong to all
major eukaryotic lineages. Levels of morphological conservation and convergent
evolution in protists are generally very high (Nikolaev et al., 2004; Richards et al.,
2006; Lilly et al., 2007; Boenigk, 2008a, 2008b).
93
94
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Until molecular biology progressed to the point where it was relatively easy to
obtain and analyse gene sequences from protist isolates the morphospecies was
used as the basis taxonomic unit for protists (Finlay et al., 1996; Finlay, 2004).
However, as explained above molecular analyses have shown that most if not all
morphospecies harbour high levels of genetic variability€ – many comprising as
much variation in the rRNA genes as in whole families, orders or classes of ‘higher’
organisms. These high levels of intra-morphospecies genetic diversity result
from both morphological conservation and convergent evolution, rendering the
Â�morphospecies misleading and inadequate for the purpose of inferring evolutionary relationships (e.g. Lilly et al., 2007). Unsurprisingly, morphospecies also conflate ecophysiologically distinct lineages within a single ‘taxon’, thereby obscuring
biologically meaningful differences in traits such as tolerance to different salinity
and pH levels, temperatures, etc. and behavioural differences (e.g. Finlay, 2004;
Boenigk et al., 2005, 2007; Scheckenbach et al., 2006; Bass et al., 2007; Foulon et al.,
2008; Pfandl et al., 2009).
Recent work has shown that, across a wide range of sexual eukaryotes, biological
species boundaries coincide with particular compensatory base changes in the
ITS2 rDNA region (Amato et al., 2007; Coleman, 2007; Müller et al., 2007). The ITS
(intergenic transcribed spacer) regions evolve much faster than the SSU and the
majority of the LSU and therefore are able to resolve differences between closely
related lineages more powerfully than the SSU alone (e.g. De Jonckheere, 1998;
Amato et al., 2007; Coleman, 2007). Therefore, in sexual species it can be demonstrated that the SSU does not evolve fast enough to resolve species-level differences
between lineages. For the vast majority of protist species sexuality is unknown,
so the biological species concept cannot be applied. However, taxonomic units
are still required in such organisms and it is arguably as valid to search for correspondences between marker genes and ‘species’-level differences in asexuals as
it is in sexuals, as long as the relationship between genotype and phenotype is
consistently found. In asexual taxa (or those of unknown sexuality) consistent differences between lineages that are biologically informative such as salinity tolerance, growth vigour and propensity to form cysts can be found between different
ITS-defined lineages (ITS-types) within a single SSU-type, e.g. Bass et al. (2007).
This study also showed that some of these ITS-types had cosmopolitan distributions whereas others showed signs of regionally restricted distributions, although
these may disappear with greater sampling effort. Whether it is agreed that these
are separate ‘species’ or not is not the subject of this chapter. What is important is
that we can consistently identify evolutionary units at a level of phylogenetic resolution that is appropriate for understanding the functional diversity of lineages in
microbial communities.
At even higher levels of phylogenetic resolution it is increasingly apparent that
real biological (morphological, ecological, etc.) differences can also be found
e i e : € a t w e n t y - f i r s t c e n t u r y d e -/ r e c o n s t r u c t i o n
within ITS-types, suggesting that even these hypervariable genetic markers are
not resolving enough to distinguish between biological distinct entities in some
organisms. Logares et al. (2007) provide the example of dinoflagellate morphospecies Scrippsiella hangoei and Peridinium aciculiferum, which show clear morphological differences but have identical ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2 and partial LSU rDNA
sequences. Barth et al. (2006) showed that ITS regions were too conserved for intraspecific analyses of Paramecium spp., and that the faster-evolving mitochondrial
cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene sequences were better suited to this purpose.
Further examples include ‘wrack’ seaweeds (Fucus spp.), where morphological
radiation in some species has occurred so rapidly that there are only low levels of
genetic divergence among them, even in the quickly evolving ITS regions (Leclerc
et al., 1998). In such cases it is possible that morphologically defined species could
have historical biogeographies while their rDNA genotypes could be more widespread or even cosmopolitan.
This makes the cases of putative geographically restricted morphotypes mentioned in the introduction (e.g. Apodera vas) potentially all the more interesting. Do
at least some of these morphotypes represent taxa in which morphological evolution
is rapid in relation to genetic marker evolution and dispersal rate (as proposed by
Logares et€al. (2007) and as for the Urocentrum turbo-like isolate in an alpine anoxic
lake (Stoeck et al., 2007a))? It is obvious that evolution does not proceed in a regular,
clock-like manner. Acquisition of characters with strong selective advantages can
be relatively fast (e.g. mitochondria, chloroplasts, secondary endosymbioses) and
can lead to rapid radiation of the ‘new’ lineage. Different lineages appear to adapt
to similar ecophysiological challenges at different rates relative to the evolution of
a single marker gene. For instance, in some protist groups marine and non-marine strains are very similar in rDNA sequences (e.g. Hoef-Emden, 2008), whereas
in others the rDNA sequence differences are much greater (von der Heyden et al.,
2004; von der Heyden and Cavalier-Smith, 2005; Bass et al., 2009b). Cases of disproportionally rapid marker evolution are increasingly well known, for example in
Foraminifera (Pawlowski and Berney, 2003), cyclotrichiid ciliates (Johnson et al.,
2004; Bass et al., 2009c), and many parasitic lineages (Cavalier-Smith, 2004).
Even where higher phylogenetic resolution than that offered by rDNA is not
required, the use of other markers is desirable at least to provide confirmation of
rDNA results. Concordance between markers cannot be taken for granted:€Przybos
et al. (2009) showed that rDNA and COI sequences from individual strains in the
Paramecium aurelia complex produced discordant phylogenetic tree topologies,
which would obviously confound phylogeographic inferences. Multiple markers
can also provide greater resolution, and a more genomic view of lineage radiation,
adaptation and occurrence. Such considerations are fundamental to protist biogeography precisely because it is important to know in biologically functional
terms what is where. Logares et al. (2009) analysed amplified fragment length
95
96
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
polymorphism (AFLP) variation€ – a highly multi-locus, genomic fingerprinting
approach€– within dinoflagellate strains with identical rRNA cistron sequences.
Some of these co-occurred within a single lake suggesting some form of sexual
and/or ecological isolation between them; differential distribution patterns in others appeared associated with known ecological shifts. NGS technologies potentially provide sufficient sequencing capacity to associate such genomic data with
biological function. However, as powerful as genomic approaches may be, they
are not currently applicable to the culture-independent probing such as is possible
with group-specific rDNA PCR primers, which relieved microscopists of the often
impossible task of identifying a particular strain in sufficiently large numbers of
environmental samples from around the world to be able to even begin to infer its
distribution. The intensive genome-scale molecular approaches described above
similarly require the isolation of individual cells or cultures from the environment.
One limited solution to this issue is to analyse cDNA created from ribosomal RNA
genes (Stoeck et al., 2007b), which, if analysed quantitatively using real time PCR
could provide a measure of the relative activity of targeted lineages in different
environments, thereby providing a more ‘functional’/niche-directed perspective
on their occurrence and distribution than the more activity-independent rDNAbased approach.
For biogeographic investigations it is important to have a choice of genetic markers and to know how best to employ them depending on the group of organisms
and specific question being asked. We believe that ITS rDNA regions have a general value in this context because of their universality, methodological tractability and increasing database representation. We are not, by extension, advocating
ITS rDNA as the best ‘barcoding gene’ for eukaryotes as a whole (although it may
turn out to be). The use of accepted barcoding genes in protistan environmental
studies would clearly be valuable, but in many cases is not possible or optimal. For
example COI has been shown to be a very good barcoding gene in many groups
(e.g. Frezal and Leblois, 2008; Ward et al., 2009), but in protists its general use is
limited as knowledge and database representation of this gene is severely limited
(or even absent) in many groups, and it is not universal as it is absent in amitochondrial taxa.
6.4╇ Is anything really ‘everywhere’ and how should
we look?
The third key issue is the ‘everywhere’ element of the EiE statement. It is conceptually easy to show that a taxonomic unit (at whatever level) is globally distributed€– i.e. is present in at least some suitable habitat in each biogeographic region
of the world (e.g. Darling et al., 2004; Slapeta et al., 2006; Bass et al., 2007), although
e i e : € a t w e n t y - f i r s t c e n t u r y d e -/ r e c o n s t r u c t i o n
SSU rDNA detection by PCR cannot distinguish between active and inactive or
inviable cells, or even extracellular DNA. (The important distinction between
cells being viable or inviable due to failure to survive the dispersal process was
made earlier.) One way around this is to use rRNA-derived measures (as described
above) to bias sampling towards metabolically active cells. However, for there to
be a rDNA signal at all indicates that the genotype in question has been distributed to the site investigated, probably quite recently and very probably with the
cell in a viable state if the DNA is still abundant and intact enough to detect repeatably in what is inevitably a minute proportion of the available sample-space (see
below). Conversely, it is impossible to prove that a protist lineage is not/cannot be
dispersed to a particular site, nothwithstanding the examples given above of morphospecies discovered in less well-sampled areas but never in apparently suitable
habitats in much more intensively sampled regions. This is an obvious point (and
is the reason why EiE is not a scientific hypothesis) but it highlights interesting
aspects of protist ecology and the ways in which it is studied.
The necessary nature of environmental samples and their collection for either
microscopic or molecular investigation imposes constraints on biogeographic
studies, although these are difficult to quantify (ironically partly because of lack
of information of the kind that such samples are intended to provide). For both
molecular and morphological analyses individual samples need to be small
(ideally and usually in the order of one gram of soil or sediment) and the intensity with which each sample can be investigated by both approaches is limited by
time and financial constraints. As an example, imagine an apparently homogen�
eous meadow-like environment. How many samples (and what size of samples)
are required to comprehensively survey the protist group(s) of interest within the
meadow and to detect relatively rare lineages therein? An impossibly high number, for very rare taxa. For more abundant and diverse taxa, other problems arise.
Howe et al. (2009) and Bass et al. (unpublished data) found that individual protist
genera can be represented by at least tens of SSU genotypes in less than a gram
of soil, that sets of genotypes from independent samples across a small site share
only 30–40% of those genotypes, and that actual diversity even within the samples
analysed may be several times greater than that actually detected in those studies. In addition there is often little overlap between SSU genotypes detected by
molecular techniques and isolation of strains into culture from the same environmental sample, for a range of reasons (Bass et al., 2009a; Howe et al., 2009). The
significance of these findings is almost certainly exaggerated by undersampling,
but exactly the same difficulties of detection afflict biogeographic studies.
In any case there is very likely to be patchy distribution of protist taxa across a
range of spatial scales caused by ecological heterogeneity and/or differences in
community assembly processes. This means that it is very difficult to determine
what is present even at a single site and within a relatively narrowly defined group
97
98
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
of organisms, and that large amounts of screening may be necessary to detect some
lineages in at least some of the habitats in which they occur (Foissner, 2008). This
problem will be even greater for rare species, about which we know very little (see
below). Compounding the ease with which a lineage can fail to be detected is temporal variation. Many, perhaps all protist communities, particularly in temperate zones, show a pronounced seasonality which means that very different sets of
species are detectable at different points of the year. Over longer time scales such
community shifts (a) may not show a regular annual pattern, (b) may be affected
by ecological/climate changes on a range of different timescales, and (c) are likely
to be subject to and influenced by changes in community assembly across time
as ecosystems mature (Lawton, 2004; Rodriguez Zaragoza et al., 2005; Thackeray
et€al., 2008, Gilbert et al., 2009; Nolte et al., 2010). Theoretically, even for a single
protist taxon, until the exact nature of its niche is known and can be measured and
identified it will be extremely difficult to investigate potential niche-space globally
to systematically determine its global distribution.
Futhermore, the conflation of geographic distance and ecological difference
means that inferences about historical biogeography based on comparing protist
communities in different parts of the world are usually unreliable. For example,
it is impossible for us to identify ecologically equivalent freshwater ponds in the
UK and Australia from the perspective of protist ecology, partly because we do not
know enough about the relative importance of the environmental parameters at
each site and therefore which ones to measure, but also because we know that the
non-microbial biotic community in which the protists live will differ due to historical biogeographic structuring, even if the microbial community is potentially
the same at both sites. There will obviously be differences in the higher plants that
grow in and around the ponds and whose organic material decays within them,
and in the animals that interact with the ponds, and even the planktonic meiofauna which graze on and are parasitised by protists. Therefore to some extent
ecological distance increases as a consequence of geographic distance; the two
cannot be decoupled. As we have seen, there is strong evidence that many protist
genotypes (SSU- and ITS-types) are active on a global scale. Do these represent
ecologically tolerant, generalist, weedy species analogous to generalist species in
higher organisms? If so what proportion of protist species fall into this category?
Generally very little is known about the relative abundances of protist taxa on a
global scale. Morphological and molecular analyses of protist communities (using
both classical environmental gene cloning and NGS approaches) show concave
taxon rank abundance curves familiar from community profiles in many organismal groups (e.g. Countway et al., 2005; Howe et al., 2009). Four hundred and fiftyfour sequencing studies suggest that the tail of rare taxa (sometimes called the ‘rare
biosphere’; Pedrós-Alió, 2006; Sogin et al., 2006; Caron, 2009; Howe et al., 2009;
Stoeck et al., 2010) is longer than previously thought (i.e. there are proportionally
e i e : € a t w e n t y - f i r s t c e n t u r y d e -/ r e c o n s t r u c t i o n
more rare taxa in all communities). Some of these lineages may be generally rare
and/or ecologically specialised, in which case they would be interesting material
for global distribution studies:€according to the EiE hypothesis such lineages have
a greater chance of showing historical biogeographic structuring than more abundant and/or generalist ones.
In fact, recent studies indicate that rather than ‘everything’, only generalist taxa
may be ubiquitously distributed since they can achieve large population sizes
and thereby high dispersal rates (Pither, 2007). Similarly, Nolte et al. (2010) suggest a systematic difference in the distribution patterns of abundant and rare taxa.
Future analyses of the ‘rare’ biosphere using NGS methods will have the power
to investigate this emerging pattern more intensively. Based on recent NGS data
similar distribution patterns of micro- and macroorganisms are more strongly
indicated than the capacity of earlier molecular techniques has allowed, i.e. global
dispersal of abundant, generalist taxa contrasting with more restricted distributions of many less abundant taxa. Most clone library-based environmental DNA
surveys relied on sample sizes below c. 1000 sequences (Kemp and Aller, 2004).
Thus historic knowledge of protist distribution patterns, from the early nineteenth
century to the recent molecular ‘low-throughput’ surveys, was therefore largely
limited to the biogeography of relatively abundant taxa. Next generation sequencing approaches enable consistent detection of many more rare taxa than earlier molecular methods, and perhaps the detection of particularly rare taxa which
were previously completely unknown.
6.5╇ Conclusions
In the light of the preceding discussion it is perhaps not surprising that most
(although not all) known morphospecies have cosmopolitan distributions. It is
also true that many SSU rDNA genotypes are also globally distributed (e.g. Finlay
et al., 2006; Slapeta et al., 2006, Bass et al., 2007, 2009c; Darling and Wade, 2008)
although we suggest that a higher proportion of SSU genotypes than of morphospecies show some degree of historical biogeographic structure. Faster-evolving
markers have been less frequently used in biogeography studies, but cosmopolitan distributions of ITS rDNA genotypes have been demonstrated in freshwater
bodies and soil (habitats which are arguably more likely to promote endemism due to their temporal transience and disjunct/ecologically heterogeneous
nature) (Barth et al., 2006; Bass et al., 2007) and of COI and other protein-coding
genes (beta-tubulin, chloroplast rbcL) in the marine picoplanktonic Micromonas
pusilla (Slapeta et al., 2006). Therefore even the fastest-evolving markers so far
employed in biogeographic studies can show cosmopolitan distributions of their
host cells. Conversely, other genotypes of fast-evolving markers can show strong
99
100
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
signs of restricted distributions (e.g. Bass et al., 2007; Darling et al., 2007; Darling
and Wade, 2008).
A general principle emerges that is well illustrated by Fontaneto et al.’s (2008)
analysis of COI sequences from global collections of the bdelloid rotifer genera
Adineta and Rotaria. They related COI diversity to three different taxonomic units,
in order from lowest to highest level of phylogenetic resolution:€ (1) traditional
morphology-based species, (2) the most inclusive monophyletic clades (according
to COI) containing a single morphospecies and (3) genetic clusters indicative of
independently evolving lineages. Even at the highest levels of resolution (individual COI clusters) some lineages were cosmopolitan (although most were restricted
to continents or smaller regions), but the general trend was of increasing endemicity with increasing phylogenetic resolution. This trend is generally true for all
organisms but is more difficult to interpret in protists due to the relative lack of
knowledge and variability of the relationship between molecular phylogeny and
taxonomy than is the case for most multicellular organisms (Fig 6.1).
Furthermore, we are only just beginning to explore the ‘rare’ protistan biosphere. As many ‘rare’ protist taxa achieve population sizes of millions or even billions of individuals in a given habitat, these taxa cannot be considered rare in the
classical sense, but appear so because we were not able to detect them with earlier
methods due to the fact that some other protist taxa were even more abundant by
orders of magnitude. These ‘rare’€ – or more accurately ‘less abundant’€ – protist
taxa cannot be ignored in a biogeography debate and they probably account for
the vast majority of protist lineage diversity (Pither, 2007; Bass et al., 2009a, 2009b;
Nolte et al., 2010).
Thus we conclude that survey-based approaches to understanding protist biogeographic patterns are strongly and multiply confounded by difficulties of comprehensive sampling, taxonomic definitions and separating ecological from
historical effects. We strongly assert that the total number of valid, free-living and
extant protist taxonomic units, whether referred to as species or not, far exceeds
the 90â•›000 estimated by Corliss (2000), the morphospecies-biased, depressed estimates of Finlay and Fenchel (1999), and even the revised figure of 300â•›000 suggested by Foissner (2008), by at least an order of magnitude. In this light (and its
ecological consequences) the protist biogeography debate becomes immeasurably complex.
6.6╇ Prospects
Next generation sequencing technologies offer a huge increase in the depth to
which environmental samples can be analysed (e.g. Sogin et al., 2006; Buée et al.,
2009; Creer et al., 2010; Medinger et al., 2010; Nolte et al., 2010; Stoeck et al., 2010).
e i e : € a t w e n t y - f i r s t c e n t u r y d e -/ r e c o n s t r u c t i o n
Fig 6.1 Biogeography is linked to taxon resolution. Higher-level taxa have wider
distribution patterns. At the opposite extreme, an individual has a distinct occurrence at
one point in space. Within a given taxon the distribution area decreases with finer taxon
resolution. Species concepts in protists are unclear and often incomparable to the rank
of species in higher eukaryotes. Therefore, for protists, distribution patterns are strongly
interrelated with species delimitation. Higher eukaryotes with well-defined taxa and a
high phylogenetic resolution of the species rank often have biogeographies. For protists
the species rank is usually much broader and less well defined, thereby contributing to
the perception of broad distribution.
However, this only ameliorates some of the problems associated with molecular
detection of protist lineages on a global scale. Apart from the conceptual issues
with defining protist OTUs there remain other methodological constraints. These
constraints relate to both molecular biology and environmental sampling. In the
former category, biases and artefacts in PCR primer activity and amplicon generation will still influence the likelihood of detecting particular genotypes and
result in a skewed representation of the genotype profile of protist communities
(e.g. Bass and Cavalier-Smith, 2004; Berney et al., 2004; Richards and Bass, 2005;
101
102
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Stoeck et€al., 2006, 2010 and references therein). In the latter category, choice of
sampling sites, knowledge of protist niche parameters and the nature of habitat
heterogeneity remain limiting as we currently know too little about them to be
able to sample in a demonstrably consistent and systematic way. The number of
independent samples required for adequate environmental surveying is at least as
big a limitation for NGS as for ‘classical’ environmental gene cloning.
We suggest that a more experimental approach is required in the field of protist biogeography, testing specific ecological hypotheses. Much of the work that
has been stimulated by EiE has attempted to identify lineages that show some
degree of endemism, but as we have shown this is tackling the problem from a
highly untractable perspective. It would instead be very enlightening and scientifically more robust to investigate which and how many lineages do conform
to EiE, and to learn about their ecology and general biology. Questions to be
addressed include:€ Are such lineages highly tolerant to stress and fluctuating
environments (at least at population levels), and/or able to remain in a viable
dormant form for long periods? Are they globally abundant, fast-growing, weedy
species, with very small dispersal agents? Such factors together must contribute
towards the ‘dispersal pressure’ of protist populations, but we know little about
their relative importance or how long this list of factors is. Knowing more about
the characteristics and conditions conducive to rapid and wide dispersal will
provide a firmer baseline for describing other kinds of distributions and understanding the processes involved in creating them. It will also provide insight
into which organisms (and therefore ecological agents) potentially provide the
same ecosystem ‘service’ globally. Some studies (but currently a minority) have
integrated community-level ecological processes with biogeographic considerations, for example Telford et al. (2006).
Almost nothing is known about the actual rates at which protist populations are
dispersed on large scales. Rapid, long-distance dispersal of small particles is well
demonstrated by the movement of weather systems around the globe, migrating animals and birds, human mobility, and very noticeably by the eruption of
the volcano near the Eyjafjallajökull glacier (Iceland) in April 2010, which sent
ash plumes visibly across Europe, dispersing innumerable particles (much larger
than many protists) on continental scales and probably globally. Therefore the
potential for equally rapid distribution of at least some protist lineages is huge.
But what are the survival and successful colonisation rates (and associated biological processes) that ultimately determine the effective dispersal rate of widespread lineages? Some insight into dispersal rate may be gained by isolating into
culture individual protist strains with apparently cosmopolitan, highly resolving
genotypes (ITS rDNA, COI, etc.) collected from sites around the world, and then
analysing them in terms of markers that evolve fast enough to be measured in the
laboratory.
e i e : € a t w e n t y - f i r s t c e n t u r y d e -/ r e c o n s t r u c t i o n
It would also be interesting to test examples of putatively geographically
restricted morphospecies using highly specific molecular probes. Perhaps many of
these taxa are more widespread than currently known but have not been detected
because they are for some reason(s) relatively rare outside of a ‘core’ range. The
examples given in the introduction of morphospecies apparently largely restricted
to the southern hemisphere€– i.e. not yet found in large areas of apparently suitable
habitats in much more intensively sampled regions of the northern hemisphere€–
are intriguing as there are many vectors that could transport them from south to
north. Unless they are very intolerant to removal from favourable conditions (as
appears to be the case for some freshwater, desiccation-intolerant chrysophytes;
Kristiansen, 2008) it would seem unlikely that they could not reach and grow in
suitable conditions far beyond their current ranges. However, other factors come
into play; for example it is increasingly clear that there is a strong effect of size on
dispersal of testate amoebae:€ larger taxa (e.g. Apodera and Certecella) are more
likely to show restricted global distributions than small taxa (Yang et al., 2010).
Such cases offer potentially informative systems for studying biological factors
resulting in limited dispersal and establishment, and also illustrate how nontrivial the separation of ecological and historical biogeographic processes can be
when analysing protist distributions. For instance, is the Urocentrum turbo-like
ciliate so far found only in an alpine anoxic lake by Stoeck et al. (2007a) more widespread in similar ecological conditions (assuming they can be found)?
Morphological and molecular analyses make very clear that most protistan
diversity is currently unknown (e.g. Chao et al., 2006; Stoeck et al., 2010). However
scientifically unfashionable it may become, it is important that we continue to discover and describe new protist taxa. There are not many reliable data about which
free-living protists are globally rare, or highly specialised. Studying these would
help to resolve to what extent morphology, abundance, population size and ecological generalism are drivers of global dispersal of protists. The overview in this
chapter strongly reinforces the necessity of looking at each group of organisms
individually and with fresh eyes. It is the differences between them, where these
can be shown to be robust and then investigated in a hypothesis-driven framework, that could prove to be the most biologically interesting and informative
sources of biogeographic insight.
References
Amato, A., Kooistra, W.H., Ghiron, J.H.
et al. (2007). Reproductive isolation
among sympatric cryptic species in
marine diatoms. Protist 158, 193–207.
Baas Becking, L.G.M. (1934).
Geobiologie€of€inleiding tot de
milieukunde. The Hague:€Van Stockum
and Zoon.
103
104
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Barth, D., Krenek, S., Fokin, S.I.,
Berendonk, T.U. (2006). Intraspecific
genetic variation in Paramecium
revealed by mitochondrial
cytochrome c oxidase I sequences.
Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 53,
20–25.
Bass, D., Cavalier-Smith, T. (2004). Phylumspecific environmental DNA analysis
reveals remarkably high global
biodiversity of Cercozoa (Protozoa).
International Journal of Systematic
and Evolutionary Microbiology 54,
2393–2404.
Bass, D., Richards, T.A., Matthai, L.,
Marsh, V., Cavalier-Smith, T. (2007).
DNA evidence for global dispersal and
probable endemicity of protozoa. BMC
Evolutionary Biology 7, 162.
Bass, D., Howe, A.T., Mylnikov, A.P. et al.
(2009a). Phylogeny and classification
of Cercomonadida:€Cercomonas,
Eocercomonas, Paracercomonas, and
Cavernomonas gen. n. Protist 160,
483–521.
Bass, D., Chao, E.E., Nikolaev, S. et al.
(2009b). Phylogeny of novel naked filose
and reticulose Cercozoa:€Granofilosea
cl. n. and Proteomyxidea revised.
Protist 160, 75–109.
Bass, D., Brown, N., Mackenzie-Dodds, J.
et al. (2009c). A molecular perspective
on ecological differentiation and
biogeography of cyclotrichiid ciliates.
Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 56,
559–567.
Beijerinck, M.W. (1913). De infusies en de
ontdekking der backteriën. Jaarboek
van de Koninklijke Akademie voor
Wetenschappen. Amsterdam:€Müller.
(Preprinted in Verzamelde geschriften
van M.W. Beijerinck, vijfde deel,
pp.€119–140. Delft, 2921).
Berney, C., Fahrni, J., Pawlowski, J.
(2004). How many novel eukaryotic
‘kingdoms’? Pitfalls and limitations
of environmental DNA surveys. BMC
Biology 2, 13.
Boenigk, J. (2008a). Nanoflagellates:
functional groups and intraspecific
variation. Denisia 23, 331–335.
Boenigk, J. (2008b). The past and
present classification problem
with nanoflagellates exemplified by
the genus Monas. Protist 159,
319–337.
Boenigk, J., Pfandl, K., Stadler, P.,
Chatzinotas, A. (2005). High diversity
of the ‘Spumella-like’ flagellates:€an
investigation based on the SSU
rRNA gene sequences of isolates
from habitats located in six different
geographic regions. Environmental
Microbiology 7, 685–697.
Boenigk, J., Pfandl, K., Garstecki, T.
et€al. (2006). Evidence for geographic
isolation and signs of endemism within
a protistan morphospecies. Applied
and Environmental Microbiology 72,
5159–5164.
Boenigk, J., Jost, S., Stoeck, T., Garstecki,€T.
(2007). Differential thermal
adaptation of clonal strains of a
protist morphospecies originating
from different climatic zones.
Environmental Microbiology 9,
593–602.
Buée, M., Reich, M., Murat, C. et al. (2009).
454 pyrosequencing analyses of forest
soils reveals an unexpectedly high
fungal diversity. New Phytologist 184,
449–456.
Caron, D.A. (2009). Past President’s
address:€protistan biogeography:€why
all the fuss? Journal of Eukaryotic
Microbiology 56, 105–112.
Cavalier-Smith, T. (2004). Only six
kingdoms of life. Proceedings of the
Royal Society of London B Biological
Sciences 271, 1251–1262.
e i e : € a t w e n t y - f i r s t c e n t u r y d e -/ r e c o n s t r u c t i o n
Chao, A., Li, P.C., Agatha, S. et al. (2006).
A statistical approach to estimate soil
ciliate diversity and distribution based
on data from five continents. Oikos 114,
479–493.
Coesel, P.F.M., Krienitz, L. (2008). Diversity
and geographic distribution of desmids
and other coccooid green algae.
Biodiversity and Conservation 17,
381–392.
Coleman, A.W. (2007). Pan-eukaryote
ITS2 homologies revealed by RNA
secondary structure. Nucleic Acids
Research 35, 3322–3329.
Corliss, J.O. (2000). Biodiversity,
classification, and numbers of species
of protists. In Raven, P.H., Williams,€T.
(eds.), Nature and Human Society.
The Quest for a Sustainable World,
pp.€130–155. Washington, DC:€National
Academy Press.
Countway, P.D., Gast, R.J., Savai, P.,
Caron, D.A. (2005). Protistan diversity
estimates based on 18S rDNA from
seawater incubations in the western
North Atlantic. Journal of Eukaryotic
Microbiology 52, 95.
Creer, S., Fonseca, V.G., Porazinska, D.L.
et al. (2010). Ultrasequencing of the
meiofaunal biosphere:€practice, pitfalls
and promises. Molecular Ecology 19,
4–20.
Darling, K.F., Wade, C.M., Stewart, I.A.
et al. (2004). Molecular evidence for
genetic mixing of Arctic and Antarctic
subpolar populations of planktonic
foraminifers. Nature 405, 43–47.
Darling, K.F., Kucera, M., Wade,€C.M.
(2007). Global molecular
phylogeography reveals persistent
Arctic circumpolar isolation in marine
planktonic protist. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences USA 104,
5002–5007.
Darling, K.F., Wade, C.M. (2008).
The genetic diversity of planktic
foraminifera and the global
distribution of ribosomal RNA
genotypes. Marine Micropaleontology
67, 216–238.
De Jonckheere, J.F. (1998). Sequence
variation in the ribosomal internal
transcribed spacers, including the 5.8S
rDNA, of Naegleria spp. Protist 149,
221–228.
De Wit, R., Bouvier, T. (2006). ‘Everything
is everywhere, but the environment
selects’; what did Baas Becking and
Beijerinck really say? Environmental
Microbiology 8, 755–758.
Fenchel, T., Finlay, B.J. (2004). The ubiquity
of small species:€patterns of local and
global diversity. BioScience 54, 777–784.
Fierer, N. (2008). Microbial biogeography:
patterns in microbial diversity
across space and time. In Zengler,€K.
(ed.), Accessing Uncultivated
Microorganisms:€f rom the Environment
to Organisms and Genomes and Back,
pp. 95–115. Washington, DC:€ASM Press.
Finlay, B.J. (2002). Global dispersal of freeliving microbial eukaryote species.
Science 296, 1061–1063.
Finlay, B.J. (2004). Protist taxonomy:€an
ecological perspective. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society of
London B 359, 599–610.
Finlay, B.J., Clarke, K.J. (1999). Apparent
global ubiquity of species in the protist
genus Paraphysomonas. Protist 150,
419–430.
Finlay, B.J., Fenchel, T. (1999). Divergent
perspectives on protist species
richness. Protist 150, 229–233.
Finlay, B.J., Fenchel, T. (2004).
Cosmopolitan metapopulations of freeliving microbial eukayotes. Protist 155,
237–244.
105
106
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Finlay, B.J., Corliss, J.O., Esteban, G.,
Fenchel, T. (1996). Biodiversity at
the microbial level:€the number of
free-living ciliates in the biosphere.
Quaternary Review of Biology 71,
221–237.
Finlay, B.J., Esteban, G.F., Brown, S.,
Fenchel, T., Hoef-Emden, K. (2006).
Multiple cosmopolitan ecotypes within
a microbial eukaryote morphospecies.
Protist 157, 377–390.
Foissner, W. (1999). Protist
diversity:€estimates of the nearimponderable. Protist 150, 363–368.
Foissner, W. (2004a). Ubiquity and
cosmopolitanism of protists
questioned. SIL News 43, 6–7.
Foissner, W. (2004b). Two new “flagship”
ciliates (Protozoa. Ciliophora) from
Venezuela:€Sleighophrys pustulata
and Luporinophrys micelae. European
Journal of Protistology 41, 99–117.
Foissner, W. (2006). Biogeography and
dispersal of micro-organisms:€a
review emphasizing protists. Acta
Protozoologica 45, 111–136.
Foissner, W. (2008). Protist diversity
and distribution:€some basic
considerations. Biodiversity and
Conservation 17, 235–242.
Foissner, W., Strüde-Kypke, M., van der
Staay, G.W.M., Moon-van der Staay,
S.-Y., Hackstein, J.H.P. (2003). Endemic
ciliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora) from
tank bromeliads (Bromeliaceae):€a
combined morphological, molecular,
and ecological study. European Journal
of Protistology 39, 365–372.
Fontaneto, D., Barraclough, T.G., Chen,€K.,
Ricci, C., Herniou, E.A. (2008).
Molecular evidence for broadscale distributions in bdelloid
rotifers:€everything is not everywhere
but most things are very widespread.
Molecular Ecology 17, 3136–3146.
Foulon, E., Not, F., Jalabert, F. et al. (2008).
Ecological niche partitioning in the
picoplanktonic green alga Micromonas
pusilla:€evidence from environmental
surveys using phylogenetic probes.
Environmental Microbiology 10,
2433–2443.
Frezal, L., Leblois, R. (2008). Four years
of DNA barcoding:€current advances
and prospects. Infection Genetics and
Evolution 8, 727–736.
Gilbert, J.A., Field, D., Swift, P. et al. (2009).
The seasonal structure of microbial
communities in the Western English
Channel. Environmental Microbiology
11, 3132–3139.
Guillou, L., Eikrem, W., ChrétiennotDinet, M.J. et al. (2004) Diversity of
picoplanktonic prasinophytes assessed
by direct nuclear SSU rDNA sequencing
of environmental samples and novel
isolates retrieved from oceanic and
coastal marine ecosystems. Protist 155,
193–214.
Habura, A., Pawlowski, J., Hanes, S.D.,
Bowser, S.S. (2004). Unexpected
foraminiferal diversity revealed
by small-subunit rDNA analysis
of Antarctic sediment. Journal of
Eukaryotic Microbiology 51, 173–179.
Hoef-Emden, K. (2007). Revision of the
genus Cryptomonas (Cryptophyceae)€II:
incongruences between the classical
morphospecies concept and molecular
phylogeny in smaller pyrenoid-less
cells. Phycologia 46, 402–428.
Hoef-Emden, K. (2008). Molecular
phylogeny of phycocyanin-containing
cryptophytes:€evolution of biliproteins
and geographical distribution. Journal
of Phycology 44, 985–993.
Howe, A.T., Bass, D., Vickerman, K.,
Chao, E.E., Cavalier-Smith, T.
(2009). Phylogeny, taxonomy, and
astounding genetic diversity of
e i e : € a t w e n t y - f i r s t c e n t u r y d e -/ r e c o n s t r u c t i o n
Glissomonadida ord. nov., the
dominant gliding zooflagellates in
soil (Protozoa:€Cercozoa). Protist 160,
159–189.
Hughes Martiny, J.B., Bohannan, B.J.M.,
Brown, J.H. et al. (2006). Microbial
biogeography: putting microorganisms
on the map. Nature Reviews
Microbiology 4, 102–112.
Johnson, M.D., Tengs, T., Oldach, D.W.,
Delwiche, C.F., Stoecker, D.K. (2004).
Highly divergent SSU rRNA genes
found in the marine ciliates Myrionecta
rubra and Mesodinium pulex. Protist
155, 347–359.
Kemp, P.F., Aller, J.Y. (2004). Estimating
prokaryotic diversity:€when are
16S rDNA libraries large enough?
Limnology and Oceanography:€Methods
2, 114–125.
Koch, T.A., Ekelund, F. (2005). Strains
of the heterotrophic flagellate Bodo
designis from different environments
vary considerably with respect to
salinity preference and SSU rRNA gene
composition. Protist 156, 97–112.
Kristiansen, J. (2008). Dispersal and
biogeography of silica-scaled
chrysophytes. Biological Conservation
17, 419–426.
Lawton, J.H. (2004). Japan Prize
commemorative lecture:€biodiversity,
conservation and sustainability. Notes
and Records of the Royal Society of
London 58, 321–333.
Leclerc, M.C., Barriel, V., Lecointre, G.,
de Reviers, B. (1998). Low divergence
in rDNA ITS sequences among five
species of Fucus (Phaeophyceae)
suggests a very recent radiation.
Journal of Molecular Evolution 46,
115–120.
Lilly, E.L., Halanych, K.M., Anderson, D.M.
(2007). Species boundaries and global
biogeography of the Alexandrium
tamarense complex (Dinophyceae).
Journal of Phycology 43, 1329–1338.
Logares, R., Rengefors, K., Kremp, A. et
al. (2007). Phenotypically different
microalgal morphospecies with
identical ribosomal DNA:€a case of
rapid adaptive evolution? Microbial
Ecology 53, 549–561.
Logares, R., Boltovskoy, A., Bensch, S.,
Laybourn-Parry, J., Rengefors, K.
(2009). Genetic diversity patterns in
five protist species occurring in lakes.
Protist 160, 301–317.
Lowe, C.D., Day, A., Kemp, S.J., Montagnes,
D.J.S. (2005). There are high levels of
functional and genetic diversity in
Oxyrrhis marina. Journal of Eukaryotic
Microbiology 52, 250–257.
Medinger, R., Nolte, V., Vinay Pandey,
R. et al. (2010). Diversity in a hidden
world:€potential and limitation of
next-generation sequencing for surveys
of molecular diversity of eukaryotic
microorganisms. Molecular Ecology 19,
32–40.
Mindell, D.P., Honeycutt, R.L.
(1990). Ribosomal RNA in
vertebrates:€evolution and phylogenetic
applications. Annual Review of Ecology
and Systematics 21,
541–566.
Mitchell, E.A.D., Meisterfeld, C. (2005).
Taxonomic confusion blurs the debate
on cosmopolitanism versus local
endemism of free-living protists.
Protist 156,
263–267.
Moreira, D., López-García, P. (2002).
The molecular ecology of microbial
eukaryotes unveils a hidden world.
Trends in Microbiology 10, 31–38.
Müller, T., Philippi, N., Dandekar,
T., Schultz, J., Wolf, M. (2007).
Distinguishing species. RNA 13,
1469–1472.
107
108
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Nanney, D.L., Park, C., Preparata, R.,
Simon, E.M. (1998). Comparison of
sequence differences in a variable 23S
rRNA domain among sets of cryptic
species of ciliated protozoa. Journal of
Eukaryotic Microbiology 45, 91–100.
Nikolaev, S.I., Berney, C., Fahrni, J.F. et al.
(2004). The twilight of Heliozoa and rise
of Rhizaria, an emerging supergroup of
amoeboid eukaryotes. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences USA
101, 8066–8071.
Nolte, V., Pandey, R.V., Jost, S. et al.
(2010). Contrasting seasonal niche
separation€between rare and abundant
taxa conceals the extent of protist
diversity. Molecular Ecology 79,
2908–2915.
O’Malley, M.A. (2007). The nineteenthcentury roots of ‘everything is
everywhere’. Nature Reviews
Microbiology 5, 647–651.
Pawlowski, J., Berney, C. (2003). Episodic
evolution of nuclear small subunit
ribosomal RNA gene in the stemlineage of Foraminifera. In Donoghue,
P.C.J., Smith, M.P. (eds.), Telling the
Evolutionary Time:€Molecular Clocks
and The Fossil Record, pp. 107–118.
Systematics Association special
volume 66. London:€Taylor and
Francis.
Pedrós-Alió, C. (2006). Marine microbial
diversity:€can it be determined? Trends
in Microbiology 14, 257–263.
Pfandl, K., Chatzinotas, A., Dyal, P.,
Beonigk, J. (2009). SSU rRNA gene
variation resolves population
heterogeneity and ecophysiological
differentiation within a morphospecies
(Stramenopiles, Chrysophyceae).
Limnology and Oceanography 54,
171–181.
Pither, J. (2007). Comment on “Dispersal
limitations matter for microbial
morphospecies”. Science 316, 1124.
Author reply 1124.
Przybos, E., Tarcz, S., Fokin, S. (2009).
Molecular polymorphism of
Paramecium tetraurelia (Ciliophora,
Protozoa) in strains originating from
difference continents. Folia Biologica
57, 57–63.
Richards, T.A., Bass, D. (2005). Molecular
screening of free-living microbial
eukaryotes:€diversity and distribution
using a meta-analysis. Current Opinion
in Microbiology 8, 240–253.
Richards, T.A., Dacks, J.B., Jenkinson,
J.M., Thornton, C.R., Talbot, N.J.
(2006). Evolution of filamentous plant
pathogens:€Gene exchange across
eukaryotic kingdoms. Current Biology
16, 1857–1864.
Rodriguez Zaragoza, S., Mayzlish, E.,
Steinberger, Y. (2005). Seasonal
changes in free-living amoeba species
in the root canopy of Zygophyllum
dumosum in the Negev Desert, Israel.
Microbial Ecology 49, 134–141.
Scheckenbach, F., Wylezich, C., Mylnikov,
A.P., Weitere, M., Arndt, H. (2006).
Molecular comparisons of freshwater
and marine isolates of the same
morphospecies of heterotrophic
flagellates. Applied and Environmental
Microbiology 72, 6638–6643.
Simon, E.M., Nanney, D.L., Doerder, F.P.
(2008). The “Tetrahymena pyriformis”
complex of cryptic species. Biodiversity
and Conservation 17, 365–380.
Slapeta, J., Moreira, D., López-García,€P.
(2005). The extent of protist
diversity:€insights from molecular
ecology of freshwater eukaryotes.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of
London B 272, 2073–2081.
Slapeta, J., López-García, P., Moreira, D.
(2006). Global dispersal and ancient
cryptic species in the smallest marine
e i e : € a t w e n t y - f i r s t c e n t u r y d e -/ r e c o n s t r u c t i o n
eukaryotes. Molecular Biology and
Evolution 23, 23–29.
Smirnov, A.V. (2003). Optimizing methods
of the recovery of gymnamoebae from
environmental samples:€a test of ten
popular enrichment media, with some
observations on the development of
cultures. Protistology 3, 47–57.
Smith, H.G., Wilkinson, D.M. (2007). Not
all free-living microorganisms have
cosmopolitan distributions€– the
case of Nebela (Apodera) vas Certes
(Protozoa:€Amoebozoa:€Arcellinida).
Journal of Biogeography 34, 1822–1831.
Smith, H.G., Bobrov, A., Lara, E., (2008).
Diversity and biogeography of
testate amoebae. Biodiversity and
Conservation 17, 329–343.
Sogin, M., Morrison, H.G., Huber, J.A.
et al. (2006). Microbial diversity in
the deep sea and underexplored
“rare biosphere”. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences USA 103,
12115–12120.
Stoeck, T., Hayward, B., Taylor, G.T.,
Varela, R., Epstein, S.S. (2006). A
multiple PCR primer approach to
access the microeukaryotic diversity
in environmental samples. Protist 157,
31–43.
Stoeck, T., Bruemmer, F., Foissner, W.
(2007a). Evidence for local ciliate
endemism in an Alpine anoxic lake.
Microbial Ecology 54, 478–486.
Stoeck, T., Zuendorf, A., Breiner, H.-W.,
Behnke, A. (2007b). A molecular
approach to identify active microbes
in environmental eukaryote clone
libraries. Microbial Ecology 53,
328–339.
Stoeck, T., Bass, D., Nebel, M. et al.
(2010). Multiple marker parallel tag
environmental DNA sequencing
reveals a highly complex eukaryotic
community in marine anoxic water.
Molecular Ecology 19 (s1), 21–31.
Telford, R.J., Vandvik, V., Birks, H.J. (2006).
Dispersal limitations matter for
microbial morphospecies. Science 312,
1015.
Thackeray, S.J., Jones, I.D., Maberly,€S.C.
(2008). Long-term change
in the phenology of spring
phytoplankton:€species-specific
responses to nutrient enrichment and
climate change. Journal of Ecology 96,
523–535.
Vanormelingen, P., Verleyen, E.,
Vyverman, W. (2008). The diversity
and distribution of diatoms:€from
cosmopolitanism to narrow endemism.
Biodiversity and Conservation 17,
393–405.
von der Heyden, S., Chao, E.E., CavalierSmith, T. (2004). Genetic diversity of
goniomonads:€an ancient divergence
between marine and freshwater
species. European Journal of Phycology
39, 343–350.
von der Heyden, S., Cavalier-Smith, T.
(2005). Culturing and environmental
DNA sequencing uncover hidden
kinetoplastid biodiversity and a major
marine clade within ancestrally
freshwater Neobodo designis.
International Journal of Systematics
and Evolutionary Microbiology 55,
2605–2621.
Vyverman, W., Verleyen, E., Sabbe, K. et al.
(2007). Historical processes constrain
patterns in global diatom diversity.
Ecology 88, 1924–1931.
Ward, R.D., Hanner, R., Hebert, P.D.N.
(2009). The campaign to DNA barcode
all fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 74,
329–356.
Wilkinson, D.M. (2010). Have we
underestimated the importance of
109
110
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
humans in the biogeography of freeliving terrestrial microorganisms?
Journal of Biogeography 37, 393–397.
Worden, A.Z. (2006). Picoeukaryote
diversity in coastal waters of the Pacific
Ocean. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 43,
165–175.
Wuyts, J., De Rijk, P., Van de Peer, Y.
et€al. (2000). Comparative analysis
of more than 3000 sequences reveals
the existence of two pseudoknots in
area V4 of eukaryotic small subunit
ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Research
28, 4698–4708.
Wylezich, C., Mylnikov, A.P., Weitere, M.,
Arndt, H. (2007). Distribution and
phylogenetic relationships of freshwater
thaumatomonads with a description
of the new species Thaumatomonas
coloniensis n. sp. Journal of Eukaryotic
Microbiology 54, 347–357.
Yang, J., Smith, H.G., Sherratt, T.N.,
Wilkinson, D.M. (2010). Is there a size
limit for cosmopolitan distribution
in free-living microorganisms? A
biogeographical analysis of testate
amoebae from polar areas. Microbial
Ecology 59, 635–645.
7
Arcellinida testate amoebae
(Amoebozoa:€Arcellinida):€model of
organisms for assessing microbial
biogeography
Thierry J. Heger 1, Enrique Lara 2
and Edward A.D. Mitchell 2
╇ WSL, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research,
Ecosystem Boundaries Research Unit, Wetlands Research Group, Lausanne,
Switzerland; Laboratory of Ecological Systems, École Polytechnique Fédérale de
Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Zoology and Animal
Biology, University of Geneva, Switzerland; and Biodiversity Research Center,
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
2
╇ Institute of Biology, Laboratory of Soil Biology, University of Neuchâtel,
Neuchâtel, Switzerland
1
7.1╇ Introduction
Although widely recognised as essential participants in ecosystem processes and
representing a significant part of the Earth’s biodiversity (Clarholm, 1985; Corliss,
2002; Schröter et al., 2003; Falkowski et al., 2004), eukaryotic microorganisms
Biogeography of Microscopic Organisms: Is Everything Small Everywhere?, ed. Diego Fontaneto.
Published by Cambridge University Press. © The Systematics Association 2011.
112
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
are very poorly understood from evolutionary and biogeographic points of view.
Major questions concerning the diversity and the distribution of protists remain
completely unresolved. Arcellinida testate amoebae are an excellent group from
which to get insights into these questions because they are easy to collect, present in different habitats and they build a shell of characteristic morphology that
remains even after the organism’s death. In this group, both cosmopolitan and
restricted distribution patterns have been documented. Some morphospecies such
as Apodera vas(=Nebela vas), Alocodera cockayni or the whole genus Certesella have
been reported as one of the most convincing examples of heterotrophic protists
with restricted distributions (Foissner, 2006; Smith and Wilkinson, 2007; Smith
et al., 2008). Arcellinida testate amoebae belong to the eukaryotic supergroup
Amoebozoa (Nikolaev et al., 2005) and are morphologically characterised by the
presence of lobose pseudopodia and a shell (test) composed from proteinaceous,
calcareous or siliceous material. It can be either self-secreted or composed of recovered and agglutinated material. The Arcellinida covers a relatively broad range of
sizes (mostly between 20 and 250€μ m). At least some species have the ability to form
a resting stage allowing their persistence under unfavourable conditions and a relatively unlimited dispersal capacity (Corliss and Esser, 1974; Foissner, 1987).
Arcellinida diversity is estimated at about 1500 species, mostly belonging to
the genera Centropyxis, Difflugia and Nebela (Meisterfeld, 2002). They are diverse
and abundant in virtually all terrestrial and freshwater aquatic habitats on Earth
from the tropics to the poles (Meisterfeld, 2002) but they were not reported from
truly marine environments. A few species have however successfully colonised
brackish water ecosystems such as the marine supralittoral zone (Golemansky,
2007; Todorov and Golemansky, 2007), as well as the saline soils (Bonnet, 1959).
The Arcellinida feed on bacteria, plant cells, protists, fungi or small metazoans
(Foissner, 1987; Yeates and Foissner, 1995; Gilbert et al., 2000). Moisture conditions
and pH are major environmental variables controlling the occurrence of testate
amoebae (Charman and Warner, 1992; Charman, 1997) and the response of testate amoebae to different ecological gradients and pollutions make them a useful
tool for palaeoecological studies and pollution monitoring (Charman et al., 2004;
Nguyen-Viet et al., 2007, 2008; Laggoun-Defarge et al., 2008; Lamentowicz et al.,
2008; Mitchell et al., 2008; Kokfelt et al., 2009).
7.2╇ Biogeography of Arcellinida:€historical views
The first investigations on the biogeography of microorganisms date back to the
mid nineteenth century when Christian Gottfried Ehrenberg (1795–1876) claimed
that mountain ranges separated divergent populations of ‘infusoria’ (ciliates)
(Ehrenberg, 1838, 1850). In his famous voyage on the Beagle, Darwin collected
some dust fallen after a storm in the Cape Verde Islands and sent this sample to
a r c e l l i n i d a t e s tat e a m o e b a e : € a m o d e l f o r a s s e s s i n g b i o g e o g r a p h y
Ehrenberg for analysis of the ciliate populations. Surprisingly for them, they found
two species observed only in South America and none observed in Africa, in spite
of the fact that the wind was blowing westwards and that Africa was closer than
America. This apparent contradiction, in addition to the observation that relatively
large particles could be transported (‘above the thousandth of an inch square’),
incited Darwin to think that small organisms have a huge dispersal potential.
The paradigm of the ubiquity of microorganisms came later with the emergence
of microbiology/bacteriology as a recognised scientific discipline (O’Malley,
2007). At that time, the study of environmental samples was based on the retrieval
and characterisation of pure cultures, and it was observed that identical organisms could be found whenever identical nutritional and physical conditions were
provided. Thus, microorganisms had to be ubiquitous, and all environments were
provided with a constant input of a ‘seed rain’ of microbes awaiting the adequate
conditions to prosper. This idea was developed mainly by Beijerinck, the founder
of the Delft School in Microbiology, who showed that it was possible to predict the
composition of a ciliate community knowing the parameters of the environment
(Beijerinck, 1913). The famous sentence ‘Everything is everywhere, but the environment selects’ was later formulated by one of his followers, Baas Becking (Baas
Becking, 1934; de Wit and Bouvier, 2006).
This paradigm seemed to rule the viewpoints of the scientific community on the
biogeography and distribution of protists well into the twentieth century. Eugène
Penard, a famous pioneer on the study of testate amoebae, was convinced that the
objects of his studies could be found everywhere when suitable conditions were
met (Penard, 1902). In his 1902 monograph, Penard recorded 92% of all Arcellinida
and Euglyphida testate amoebae species described to that date in the Lake Geneva
area alone. However, with hindsight, he had described many of the species in that
monograph or in earlier studies, so this finding may not be very surprising. Indeed,
in the following decades, other researchers such as Heinis (1914) and Deflandre
(1928, 1936) analysed samples from other biogeographic regions and observed significantly different faunas. Later, Penard himself eventually revised his opinion of
the cosmopolitanism of testate amoebae (Penard, 1938).
These pioneering studies had a major influence on later research. By the end of
the twentieth century and the beginning of the twenty-first, the existence of limited geographic ranges in testate amoebae was admitted by almost all specialists.
Diatom taxonomists also reached a similar conclusion (Kilroy et al., 2003; Van de
Vijver et al., 2005; Vanormelingen et al., 2008).
7.3╇ Endemic Arcellinida morphospecies
Arcellinida testate amoebae comprise some of the most convincing illustrations
of non-cosmopolitan heterotrophic protists. The conspicuous testate amoebae
113
114
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Fig 7.1 Sketch map showing Apodera vas (=Nebela vas) records in the southern
hemisphere and the tropics (after Smith and Wilkinson, 2007).
Apodera vas and Certesella spp., which occur only to the south of the Tropic
of Cancer desert belt (Fig 7.1) (Smith and Wilkinson, 2007; Smith et al., 2008),
represent classical examples of morphospecies with restricted distributions.
The geographic distributions of these organisms contradict Baas Becking’s
‘Everything is everywhere, but the environment selects’ tenet because in spite of
the fact that they were found frequently in the southern hemisphere and low latitudinal zones of the northern hemisphere, they were never encountered in similar
Holarctic habitats where most studies on testate amoebae from distinct habitats such as mosses, soils or aquatic environments took place. These genera also
stand out by their very distinct morphologies which allow unambiguous identification, making them good examples of ‘flagship species’ (sensu Foissner, 2006).
This contrasts with many other taxa of testate amoebae and other free-living protists whose geographic distribution cannot be established with any degree of certainty because of taxonomic uncertainties (Smith et al., 2008; Heger et al., 2009).
It is therefore quite likely that besides these flagship species, many more taxa also
have limited distributions (see further).
a r c e l l i n i d a t e s tat e a m o e b a e : € a m o d e l f o r a s s e s s i n g b i o g e o g r a p h y
7.4╇ Assessing the distribution of Apodera vas and
Certesella morphospecies in Mesoamerica
Mesoamerica has been the place of contact between South American and North
American fauna and flora, an event that took place 3 Mya when the Panamá isthmus was closed allowing macroorganisms to disperse between the two American
continents (Webb, 1991). However, in comparison with what is known with macroorganisms the potential impact of the rise of the isthmus on the dispersion of
microorganisms between North and South America (and/or vice versa) remains
completely unknown. Mesoamerica represents an interesting test case for the
ongoing debate over microbial biogeography:€if long-distance dispersal is easy
for microorganisms then the existence or absence of this isthmus should not
affect distribution patterns. However, if microorganisms do not disperse easily
over long distances, then the presence of an isthmus will affect distribution patterns by allowing southern taxa to migrate northwards or vice versa.
Because of the possible existence of distinct faunas of free-living protists in
South and North America, Mesoamerica is a key region for the study of protistan
biogeography. However, although the biogeographic distributions of Apodera
vas and Certesella spp. are reasonably well documented at a global scale, their
distributions in Mesoamerica have so far not been investigated systematically
(Heinis, 1911; Kufferath, 1929; Bonnet, 1977a; Madrazo-Garibay and LópezOchoterena, 1982; Smith and Wilkinson, 2007; Smith et al., 2008). To our knowledge, only two studies based on a very small number of samples reported the
presence of Apodera vas in Costa Rica, Guatemala and Mexico (Golemansky,
1967; Laminger, 1973) while Certesella spp. were only reported in Guatemala
(Laminger, 1973). To this day, the second northernmost reported continental
occurrence of Apodera vas is Mexico (Laminger, 1973); Nepal is the northernmost occurrence (Bonnet, 1977b). The aim of this study is to estimate the distribution of the ‘southern hemisphere and tropical endemic Hyalospheniids’
(SHTEH; i.e. Apodera vas and members of genus Certesella) along a south–north
latitudinal Mesoamerican transect extending from Panama to the south of
Mexico.
7.5╇ Methods and sampling area
To assess the biogeographic distributions of Apodera vas and Certesella mor�
phospecies, over 200 moss and litter samples were collected along a transect
from€Panama to Mexico. In addition to the latitudinal gradient, this region is
characterised by altitudinal gradients, resulting in a broad diversity of biomes
115
116
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
from wet lowland rainforest and cloud forest to dry scrublands and desert. In
this study, wet moss and wet litter samples were collected in cloud and mesophilous forests between April and May 2007 (Table 7.1) because such moist
substrates were described as suitable habitats for A. vas and Certesella spp.
(SHTEH) (Smith and Wilkinson, 2007 and references therein). To extract testate amoebae, moss and litter samples were shaken energetically in water and
then sieved and back-sieved using appropriate mesh sizes (250 and 20â•›μ m).
The occurrence of Apodera vas and Certesella spp. was checked using a light
microscope under 200× magnification. Cells from Apodera vas specimens from
Monte Cristo (El Salvador) were isolated and documented by scanning electron
microscopy (SEM). The SEM was performed as described in Heger et al. (2009).
Up to now, three Certesella species have been described (Meisterfeld, 2002).
However, given that the taxonomy of genus Certesella is still relatively unclear,
we adopted a conservative approach and did not distinguish among Certesella
species.
7.6╇ Results and discussion
This survey confirmed the widespread occurrence of SHTEH in Mesoamerica. For
the first time, Apodera vas was recorded in Panama, Salvador and Nicaragua while
Certesella morphospecies were recorded for the first time in Panama, Costa Rica,
Nicaragua, Salvador and Mexico (Table 7.1, Figs 7.2 and 7.3). We found Certesella
spp. and Apodera vas specimens in most samples collected from favourable forest habitats (i.e. permanently wet moss and litter samples). The exact northernmost distribution limit of SHTEH in Mexico remains unclear. The region located
between Mexico City and the USA was indeed poorly or not investigated. All samples with Apodera vas or Certesella spp. were collected at elevations between about
1000 and 3100 m a.s.l. Apodera vas and Certesella spp. co-occurred in seven of the
35 samples (Table 7.1), confirming that these species have relatively similar ecological tolerances (Charman, 1997). Our data also confirm that as far as suitable
microhabitats occur, these SHTEH can live in relatively distinct ecosystems. For
instance, we found Apodera vas and Certesella spp. in the Monteverde cloud forest where mean annual precipitation and temperature were 2500 mm and 18.8 °C
(Clark et al., 2000) as well as in the Volcan Poás forest where precipitation exceeded
3400 mm and mean annual temperature was lower than 13 °C (Rowe et al., 1992;
Martinez et al., 2000). In the literature, these species with restricted distributions
were also reported in South American peatlands (Zapata et al., 2008) and New
Zealand peatlands (Charman, 1997). Interestingly, some moss species harbouring SHTEH in the south of the Tropic of Cancer desert belt are also present in the
Holarctic habitats where SHTEH were never reported. For instance, Apodera vas
Volcan
Poás
*
Costa
Rica
Volcan Barva Costa Rica
*
*
Volcan Barva Costa Rica
*
*
Costa Rica
N.A
*
10˚11ʹ27ʹʹN
84˚13ʹ58.6ʹʹW
10˚08ʹN 84˚06ʹW
10˚08ʹN 84˚06ʹW
c. 9–10˚N
82–84˚W
09˚27ʹ15.6ʹʹN
83˚32ʹ55.1ʹʹW
Costa Rica
Parque
Nacional
Chirripo
09˚27ʹ53ʹʹN
83˚34ʹ03ʹʹW
Costa Rica
*
09˚27ʹN 83˚34ʹW
Costa Rica
Parque
Nacional
Chirripo
08˚54ʹ05ʹʹN
82˚37ʹ05ʹʹW
08˚54ʹ04.9ʹʹN
82˚37ʹ13ʹʹW
08˚53ʹ58.5ʹʹN
82˚37ʹ11ʹʹW
Coordinates
Panama
*
Parque La
Amistad
Panama
Panama
Parque
Nacional
Chirripo
*
Parque La
Amistad
Parque La
Amistad
Country
*
*
*
Apodera Certesella Sampling
vas
sp.
location
13.4.2007
15.4.2007
15.4.2007
1966
moss
moss
moss
N.A
moss
moss
11.4.2007
11.4.2007
moss
moss
moss
moss
Cloud
forest
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
N.A
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
Substrate Ecosystem
11.4.2007
30.3.2007
30.3.2007
30.3.2007
Sampling
date
Table 7.1 Locations and characteristics of all Apodera vas and Certesella spp. records in Mesoamerica.
~2575
~2830
~2830
2000–4000
~2400
2066
~2350
~2380
~2450
~2455
Altitude (m)
new record
new record
new record
Laminger
(1973)
new record
new record
new record
new record
new record
new record
Reference
Volcan Poás
Volcan Poás
*
*
*
Monteverde
reserva
Monteverde
reserva
Monteverde
reserva
Monteverde
reserva
Santa Elena
reserva
Volcan
Mombacho
Volcan
Mombacho
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Nicaragua
Nicaragua
Costa Rica
Costa Rica
Costa Rica
Costa Rica
Costa Rica
Costa Rica
Costa Rica
Costa Rica
*
*
Volcan Poás
Country
Apodera Certesella Sampling
vas
sp.
location
Table 7.1 (cont.)
11˚50ʹ03ʹʹN
85˚58ʹ48ʹʹW
11˚50ʹ07ʹʹN
85˚58ʹ46ʹʹW
10˚20ʹN 84˚47ʹW
10˚18ʹN 84˚47ʹW
10˚18ʹN 84˚47ʹW
10˚18ʹN 84˚47ʹW
10˚18ʹN 84˚47ʹW
10˚11ʹ27ʹʹN
84˚13ʹ58.6ʹʹW
10˚11ʹ27ʹʹN
84˚13ʹ58.6ʹʹW
10˚11ʹ27ʹʹN
84˚13ʹ58.6ʹʹW
Coordinates
20.04.2007
20.04.2007
20.04.2007
18.4.2007
18.4.2007
18.4.2007
18.4.2007
13.4.2007
13.4.2007
13.4.2007
Sampling
date
moss
moss
moss
moss
moss
moss
moss
moss
moss
moss
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
Substrate Ecosystem
1143
1123
~1550
~1570
~1570
~1570
~1570
~2575
~2575
~2575
Altitude (m)
new record
new record
new record
new record
new record
new record
new record
new record
new record
new record
Reference
Parque
Montecristo
Parque
Montecristo
Parque
Montecristo
N.A
Biotopo del
Quetzal
Biotopo del
Quetzal
Biotopo del
Quetzal
Biotopo del
Quetzal
Biotopo del
Quetzal
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Biotopo del
Quetzal
Parque
Montecristo
*
*
Parque
Montecristo
*
Guatemala
Guatemala
Guatemala
Guatemala
Guatemala
Guatemala
Guatemala
Salvador
Salvador
15˚12ʹN 90˚13ʹW
15˚12ʹN 90˚13ʹW
15˚12ʹN 90˚13ʹW
15˚12ʹN 90˚13ʹW
15˚12ʹN 90˚13ʹW
15˚12ʹN 90˚13ʹ W
c. 14–15˚N,
89–92˚W
14˚25ʹN 89˚21ʹW
14˚25ʹN 89˚21ʹW
14˚25ʹN 89˚21ʹW
14˚25ʹN 89˚21ʹW
Salvador
Salvador
14˚25ʹN 89˚21ʹW
Salvador
27.04.2007
27.04.2007
27.04.2007
27.04.2007
27.04.2007
27.04.2007
1966/1970
24.4.2007
24.4.2007
24.4.2007
24.4.2007
24.4.2007
moss
moss
moss
moss
moss
moss
N.A
moss
moss
moss
moss
moss
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
N.A
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
1750–1900
~1650
~1650
~1650
~1650
~1650
2000–4000
~2000
~2000
~2000
~2000
2140
new record
new record
new record
new record
new record
new record
Laminger
(1973)
new record
new record
new record
new record
new record
Tequila
Tequila
N.A
Between
Desierto de
los Leones
and Cruz
Blanca
*
*
*
*
Ixtlán de
Juárez
*
*
Ixtlán
Biotopo del
Quetzal
*
*
Apodera Certesella Sampling
vas
sp.
location
Table 7.1 (cont.)
5.5.2007
27.04.2007
Sampling
date
c. 19˚N, 97˚W
19˚16ʹN, 99˚19ʹW
Mexico
1967
1966
18˚43ʹ32ʹʹN 97˚04ʹ 8.5.2007
37ʹʹW
18˚43ʹ32ʹʹN 97˚04ʹ 8.5.2007
37ʹ ʹW
17˚22ʹ49ʹʹN 96˚26ʹ 6.5.2007
51ʹʹW
17˚17ʹ45ʹʹN 96˚23ʹ
53ʹʹW
15˚12ʹN 90˚13ʹW
Coordinates
Mexico
Mexico
Mexico
Mexico
Mexico
Guatemala
Country
moss
N.A
litter
litter
moss
moss
moss
Temperate
forest
N.A
Forest
Forest
Mesophilous
forest
Cloud forest
Cloud forest
Substrate Ecosystem
3100–3700
2000ñ4000
1770
1770
3050
2350
1750–1900
Altitude (m)
Golemansky
(1967)
Laminger
(1973)
new record
new record
new record
new record
new record
Reference
a r c e l l i n i d a t e s tat e a m o e b a e : € a m o d e l f o r a s s e s s i n g b i o g e o g r a p h y
Fig 7.2 Scanning electron pictures illustrating Apodera vas from Salvador. Scale bars
50€µm.
Fig 7.3 Sketch maps showing (A) the occurrences of the testate amoebae Apodera vas
and (B) Certesella spp. along a Mesoamerican transect between Panama and the south of
Mexico. Black dots indicate new records while the white dot represents the Apodera vas
record published by Golemansky (1967). The records published by Laminger (1973) were
not reported on this map because of the lack of accurate coordinates. Details of sites are
given in Table 7.1.
were found in a Sphagnum magellanicum sample collected in Laguna Esmeralda
(near Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina; E. Lara, unpublished data) but were
never reported from holarctic Sphagnum magellanicum samples. Altogether, these
data support the interpretation that the absence of these species in Holarctic habitats is not explained by the lack of a specific habitat in the northern hemisphere.
Abundant favourable moist soil and moist litter habitats are indeed present in
Europe and North America from the Boreal tundra to temperate rain forests. Thus,
the SHTEH example is clearly inconsistent with the ‘Everything is everywhere, but
the environment selects’ tenet.
121
122
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
7.7╇ Evaluating the consequences of potential cryptic
species within endemic Arcellinida morphospecies
Cryptic diversity has been commonly reported in several free-living protist morphospecies (de Vargas et al., 1999; Slapeta et al., 2005; Heger et al., 2010). Within
the endemic Certesella and Apodera vas morphospecies, the presence of a hidden
diversity is therefore also possible. In the case of Apodera vas, several indices such
as its polymorphic shell (Smith and Wilkinson, 2007; Zapata and Fernández, 2008)
and its relatively wide environmental tolerances indeed suggest the presence of
cryptic species (species which cannot be discriminated by morphology alone) or
pseudocryptic species (species with subtle morphological dissimilarities, possibly
visible only by scanning electron microscopy) within this morphospecies. Each of
these potential hidden species can have either a distribution corresponding to the
actual Apodera vas/Certesella morphospecies distributions or a more restricted
distribution. In order to evaluate the genetic diversity within these endemic morphospecies, molecular-based studies are needed.
7.8╇ Potential factors governing the distribution of
Arcellinida
The debate over cosmopolitan vs. limited endemism in free-living microorganisms has mostly focused on the question of taxonomy:€defenders of cosmopolitanism are usually ‘lumpers’ while defenders of endemism are usually ‘splitters’ (see
Finlay et al., 2004 and answer by Mitchell and Meisterfeld, 2005 for an example).
Recent developments in taxonomy and especially in molecular taxonomy have
provided several examples showing that the splitters may be right and that we
have even underestimated the true diversity of testate amoebae (Lara et al., 2008).
However, this debate is only one part of the whole story. Several other important
factors influence the distribution of free-living microorganisms and all of these
suffer from a clear lack of data or conceptual framework:
1.
Dispersal by wind. Free-living microorganisms are assumed to be small
enough to be easily transported by wind (Finlay, 2002). However, although
several studies have revealed the presence of microorganisms (mostly bacteria
and fungi) in the atmosphere and highlight the importance of atmospheric
transport for microbial large scale dispersion (Darwin, 1846; Griffin et€ al.,
2002; Kellogg and Griffin, 2006; Gorbushina et al., 2007; Hervas et al., 2009;
Pearce et al., 2009), no data are available for testate amoebae. Atmospheric
circulation models could be used to model potential �long-distance
a r c e l l i n i d a t e s tat e a m o e b a e : € a m o d e l f o r a s s e s s i n g b i o g e o g r a p h y
dispersal of microorganisms under different scenarios (e.g. size of the organisms) (Wilkinson et al., In prep).
2.
Dispersal by animals. The main potential factor for natural dispersal of freeliving microorganisms other than wind is migratory animals, mainly birds.
The feathers of birds constitute ideal sampling and transportation devices for
microorganisms. This will be most efficient for birds living in wetlands and
ground-nesting and/or feeding taxa. Although several studies have shown
that birds can transport high numbers of microorganisms (Wuthrich and
Matthey, 1980; Bisson et al., 2009), we are far from having a clear image of the
local and global potential dispersal of free-living microorganisms by birds. A
potential limitation of birds as vectors of free-living microorganisms is that
the nesting habitat of many long-distance migratory birds is very different
from their wintering habitats. For example, many shorebirds nest in freshwater wetlands and bogs in the boreal and arctic regions but winter in brackish water wetlands.
3.
Dispersal by humans. Wilkinson (2010) discussed the potential role of
humans in dispersing terrestrial free-living microorganisms. Given the exponential increase in travel across continents, this is currently a very significant
mechanism for long-distance dispersal. Humans may have contributed to the
dispersal of microorganisms for millennia through their own migrations, the
spread of agriculture and the development of long-distance ocean travel.
4.
Survival during transportation. Long-distance transport, especially on
birds’ feathers or by wind exposes microorganisms to unfavourable conditions such as drought, freezing and UV radiation. Therefore it may be that,
although many microorganisms can be transported over long distances, they
do not survive and cannot colonise a new habitat. It would therefore be useful to test experimentally the resistance of various microorganisms to the
range of conditions they are likely to experience during transport in order to
determine if survival plays a role in shaping biogeographic patterns. Many
free-living microorganisms are able to encyst and when encysted would presumably survive extended periods of time in the air. However, the encystment
and excystment capacities of most microorganisms are not well documented
(Corliss and Esser, 1974; Foissner, 1987).
5.
Establishment in an existing community. The potential for viable microorganisms falling on soil or into an aquatic environment to establish new populations will depend on several factors such as the ecological conditions of the
new environment (do microclimatic and physico-chemical conditions match
its own requirements?) and biotic interactions (are potential prey organisms
present in the case of a predator, could local predators wipe out the newly
123
124
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
developed population?). The importance of competition in a community
assembly of testate amoebae is currently unclear. For example Wanner and
Xylander (2005) found no evidence for species turnover in a primary colonisation sequence of sand dunes. Experiments could quite easily be done to
test the potential for alien species to become established in existing communities but such experiments have to our knowledge not been performed with
Arcellinida.
Taken together these factors show that the dispersal potential of free-living
microorganisms is clearly not only a matter of size.
7.9╇ Perspectives
Palaeoecology could potentially provide useful information on the dispersal
potential of Arcellinida. For example, peat deposits and lake sediments could be
studied to determine how Arcellinids (re-)colonised those habitats after the last
glacial retreat or if their diversity on isolated islands increased with the arrival
of humans. However, a potential confounding factor of this latter possible study
is that humans usually strongly modify the vegetation of such islands, either directly by clearing forests for agriculture or indirectly by introducing animals such
as goats and cows that strongly alter the vegetation. Such changes in turn may
affect the ecology of wetlands and lakes, thus causing shifts in communities of
microorganisms that are not necessarily related to the establishment of new taxa
on the island but simply the colonisation of habitats that became favourable to
taxa that already lived on the island but in other locations.
An international network of suction traps has been established since the nineteenth century for the study of plant pests such as aphids (Klueken et al., 2009).
These traps could easily be used to sample microorganisms from the air and
obtain a quantitative estimate of the colonisation rate and diversity of air-transported microbes.
In order to better understand the Arcellinida gene flow among regions and continents, it would be also highly relevant to assess the phylogeography of selected
Arcellinida morphospecies. Indeed, a purely morphological approach does not
provide any information on the genetic structure of the populations and the level
of gene flow among populations. If a highly variable gene was studied and little
or no genetic differentiation among populations of a species was observed, this
would provide evidence for a high level of dispersal, consistent with the ‘ubiquity
theory’. In contrast, a high degree of genetic differentiation among populations
would indicate that limited geographic distributions exist in protists, providing
evidence against the ‘ubiquity theory’. In addition, such a study would also contribute to resolving taxonomic uncertainties.
a r c e l l i n i d a t e s tat e a m o e b a e : € a m o d e l f o r a s s e s s i n g b i o g e o g r a p h y
Finally, process-based modelling and sensitivity tests of all model parameters
would be useful to assess which factors may play the biggest role in determining
the dispersal potential of free-living microorganisms. Models cannot be expected
to provide definitive answers, at least not with the current lack of data and understanding on critical parameters that will need to be included in the model, but they
would be useful in clarifying which of the many open questions matters most.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by Swiss NSF projects n° 205321–109709 (to E. Mitchell)
and (Ambizione fellowship, E. Lara) and the Swiss Academy of Sciences (travel/
PZ00P2_122042 grant). Additional funding to EM by CCES projects RECORD and
BigLink is kindly acknowledged. We thank the authorities of the Smithsonian
Tropical Research Institution, especially Yves Basset, the coordinator of the
Canopy Crane Access Systems for allowing fieldwork and providing logistical support. We are also grateful for the fieldwork assistance of Tanja Schwander. The
authors wish to thank Elena Rossel for technical support, Kathryn Lannas for GIS
assistance and Humphrey Smith as well as two anonymous referees for fruitful
comments on the manuscript. SEM at the EPFL was made possible through the
Interdisciplinary Centre for Electron Microscopy (CIME).
References
Baas Becking, L.G.M. (1934). Geobiologie
of inleiding tot de milieukunde.
The€Hague:€Van Stockum and
Zoon.
Beijerinck, M.W. (1913). De infusies
en de ontdekking der backteriën.
Amsterdam:€Müller.
Bisson, I.A., Marra, P.P., Burtt, E.H.,
Sikaroodi, M., Gillevet, P.M. (2009).
Variation in plumage microbiota
depends on season and migration.
Microbial Ecology 58, 212–220.
Bonnet, L. (1959). Quelques aspects
des populations Thécamoebiennes
endogées. Bulletin de la Société
d’Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse 94,
413–428.
Bonnet, L. (1977a). Faunistique et
biogéographie des Thécamoebiens. I.
Thécamoebiens des sols du Mexique.
Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire
Naturelle de Toulouse 113, 40–44.
Bonnet, L. (1977b). Le peuplement
thécamoebien des sols du Népal et son
intérêt biogéographique. Bulletin de la
Société d’Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse
113, 331–348.
Charman, D.J. (1997). Modelling
hydrological relationships of testate
amoebae (Protozoa:€Rhizopoda) on
New Zealand peatlands. Journal of
the Royal Society of New Zealand 27,
465–483.
Charman, D.J., Warner, B.G. (1992).
Relationship between testate
amebas (Protozoa, Rhizopoda) and
microenvironmental parameters on
a forested peatland in Northeastern
125
126
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Ontario. Canadian Journal of Zoology€–
Revue Canadienne de Zoologie 70,
2474–2482.
Charman, D.J., Brown, A.D.,
Hendon,€D., Karofeld, E. (2004).
Testing the relationship between
Holocene peatland palaeoclimate
reconstructions and instrumental data
at two European sites. Quaternary
Science Reviews 23, 137–143.
Clarholm, M. (1985). Interactions of
bacteria, protozoa and plants leading
to mineralization of soil-nitrogen. Soil
Biology and Biochemistry 17, 181–187.
Clark, K.L., Lawton, R.O., Butler, P.R.
(2000). The physical environment. In
Nadkarni NM, Wheelwright NT (eds.),
Monteverde, Ecology and Conservation
of a Tropical Cloud Forest, pp 16–38.
New York:€Cambridge University Press.
Corliss, J.O. (2002). Biodiversity and
biocomplexity of the protists and an
overview of their signifiant roles in
maintenance of our biosphere. Acta
Protozoologica 41, 199–219.
Corliss, J.O., Esser, S.C. (1974). Role of cyst
in life-cycle and survival of free-living
protozoa. Transactions of the American
Microscopical Society 93, 578–593.
Darwin, C. (1846). An account of the fine
dust which often falls on vessels in the
Atlantic Ocean. Quarterly Journal of the
Geological Society 2, 26–30.
Deflandre, G. (1928). Le genre Arcella
Ehrenberg. Morphologie-Biologie.
Essai phylogénétique et systématiqe.
Archiv für Protistenkunde 64, 152–287.
Deflandre, G. (1936). Etude
monographique sur le genre Nebela
Leidy. Annales de Protistologie 5,
201–286.
de Vargas, C., Norris, R., Zaninetti, L.,
Gibb, S.W., Pawlowski, J. (1999).
Molecular evidence of cryptic
speciation in planktonic foraminifers
and their relation to oceanic provinces.
Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences USA 96, 2864–2868.
de Wit, R., Bouvier, T. (2006). ‘Everything
is everywhere, but the environment
selects’; what did Baas Becking and
Beijerinck really say? Environmental
Microbiology 8, 755–758.
Ehrenberg, C.G. (1838). Ein Blick in das
tiefere organische Leben der Natur. In
Voss VvL (ed.), Die Infusionstheirchen
als vollkommene Organismen. Leipzig.
Ehrenberg, C.G. (1850). On infusorial
deposits on the River Chutes in Oregon.
American Journal of Science 9, 140.
Falkowski, P.G., Katz, M.E., Knoll, A.H.
et al. (2004). The evolution of modern
eukaryotic phytoplankton. Science 305,
354–360.
Finlay, B.J. (2002). Global dispersal of freeliving microbial eukaryote species.
Science 296, 1061–1063.
Finlay, B.J., Esteban, G.F., Fenchel, T.
(2004). Protist diversity is different?
Protist 155, 15–22.
Foissner, W. (1987). Soil
protozoa:€fundamental problems,
ecological significance, adaptation in
ciliates and testaceans, bioindicators,
and guide to the literature. Progress in
Protozoology 2, 69–212.
Foissner, W. (2006). Biogeography and
dispersal of micro-organisms:€a
review emphasizing protists. Acta
Protozoologica 45, 111–136.
Gilbert, D., Amblard, C., Bourdier,€G.,
Francez, A.-J., Mitchell, E.A.D.
(2000). Le régime alimentaire des
thécamoebiens. L’Année Biologique 39,
57–68.
Golemansky, V. (1967). Tecamebianos
Muscicolas (Rhizopoda, Testacea)
de Mexico. Revista de la Sociedad
Mexicana de Historia Natural 18,
73–77.
a r c e l l i n i d a t e s tat e a m o e b a e : € a m o d e l f o r a s s e s s i n g b i o g e o g r a p h y
Golemansky, V. (2007). Testate amoebas
and monothalamous foraminifera
(Protozoa) from the Bulgarian Black
Sea Coast. In Fet V., Popov, A. (eds.),
Biogeography and Ecology of Bulgaria,
pp. 555–570. Dordrecht:€Springer.
Gorbushina, A.A., Kort, R., Schulte,€A.
et al. (2007). Life in Darwin’s
dust:€intercontinental transport and
survival of microbes in the nineteenth
century. Environmental Microbiology 9,
2911–2922.
Griffin, D.W., Kellogg, C.A., Garrison,€V.H.,
Shinn, E.A. (2002). The global transport
of dust€– an intercontinental river
of dust, microorganisms and toxic
chemicals flows through the Earth’s
atmosphere. American Scientist 90,
228–235.
Heger, T.J., Mitchell, E.A.D., Ledeganck,
P. et al. (2009). The curse of taxonomic
uncertainty in biogeographical studies
of free-living terrestrial protists:€a
case study of testate amoebae
from Amsterdam Island. Journal of
Biogeography 36, 1551–1560.
Heger, T.J., Mitchell, E.A.D.,
Golemansky,€V. et al. (2010). Molecular
phylogeny of euglyphid testate
amoebae (Cercozoa:€Euglyphida)
suggests transitions between marine
supralittoral and freshwater/terrestrial
environments are infrequent.
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
55, 113–122.
Heinis, F. (1911). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der
Centralamerikanischen Moosfauna.
Revue Suisse de Zoologie 19, 253–256.
Heinis, F. (1914). Die Moosfauna
Columbiens:€In Voyage d’exploration
scientifique en Colombie. Mémoires de
la Société Neuchâteloise des Sciences
Naturelles 5, 675–730.
Hervas, A., Camarero, L., Reche, I.,
Casamayor, E.O. (2009). Viability
and potential for immigration of
airborne bacteria from Africa that
reach high mountain lakes in Europe.
Environmental Microbiology 11,
1612–1623.
Kellogg, C.A., Griffin, D.W. (2006).
Aerobiology and the global transport
of desert dust. Trends in Ecology and
Evolution 21, 638–644.
Kilroy, C., Sabbe, K., Bergey, E.A.,
Vyverman, W., Lowe, R. (2003).
New species of Fragilariforma
(Bacillariophyceae) from New Zealand
and Australia. New Zealand Journal of
Botany 41, 535–554.
Klueken, A.M., Hau, B., Ulber, B., Poehling,
H.M. (2009). Forecasting migration of
cereal aphids (Hemiptera:€Aphididae)
in autumn and spring. Journal of
Applied Entomology 133, 328–344.
Kokfelt, U., Rosen, P., Schoning, K. et€al.
(2009). Ecosystem responses to
increased precipitation and permafrost
decay in subarctic Sweden inferred
from peat and lake sediments. Global
Change Biology 15, 1652–1663.
Kufferath, H. (1929). Algues et protistes
muscicoles, corticoles et terrestres
récoltés sur la montagne de Barba
(Costa Rica). Annales de Cryptogamie
Exotique 2, 23–52.
Laggoun-Defarge, F., Mitchell, E., Gilbert,€D.
et al. (2008). Cut-over peatland
regeneration assessment using organic
matter and microbial indicators
(bacteria and testate amoebae). Journal
of Applied Ecology 45, 716–727.
Lamentowicz, M., Obremska, M.,
Mitchell, E.A.D. (2008). Autogenic
succession, land-use change, and
climatic influences on the Holocene
development of a kettle-hole mire
in Northern Poland. Review of
Palaeobotany and Palynology 151,
21–40.
127
128
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Laminger, H. (1973). Die Testaceen
(Protozoa, Rhizopoda) einiger
Hochgebirgsgewässer von Mexiko,
Costa Rica und Guatemala.
Internationale Revue der gesamten
Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie 58,
273–305.
Lara, E., Heger, T.J., Ekelund, F.,
Lamentowicz, M., Mitchell, E.A.D.
(2008). Ribosomal RNA genes challenge
the monophyly of the Hyalospheniidae
(Amoebozoa:€Arcellinida). Protist 159,
165–176.
Madrazo-Garibay, M., LópezOchoterena,€E. (1982). Segunda lista
taxonómica comentada de protozoarios
de vida libre de México. Revista
latinoamericana de microbiología 24,
281–295.
Martinez, M., Fernandez, E., Valdes, J.
et al. (2000). Chemical evolution and
volcanic activity of the active crater
lake of Poas volcano, Costa Rica,
1993–1997. Journal of Volcanology and
Geothermal Research 97, 127–141.
Meisterfeld, R. (2002). Order Arcellinida
Kent, 1880. In Lee JJ, Leedale GF,
Bradbury P (eds.), The Illustrated
Guide To The Protozoa, pp.
827–860. Lawrence, KS:€Society of
Protozoologists.
Mitchell, E.A.D., Meisterfeld, R. (2005).
Taxonomic confusion blurs the debate
on cosmopolitanism versus local
endemism of free-living protists.
Protist 156, 263–267.
Mitchell, E.A.D., Charman, D.J., Warner,
B.G. (2008). Testate amoebae analysis
in ecological and paleoecological
studies of wetlands:€past, present and
future. Biodiversity and Conservation
17, 2115–2137.
Nguyen-Viet, H., Gilbert, D., Mitchell,
E.A.D., Badot, P.M., Bernard, N. (2007).
Effects of experimental lead pollution
on the microbial communities
associated with Sphagnum fallax
(Bryophyta). Microbial Ecology 54,
232–241.
Nguyen-Viet, H., Bernard, N., Mitchell,
E.A.D., Badot, P.M., Gilbert, D.
(2008). Effect of lead pollution on
testate amoebae communities
living in Sphagnum fallax:€an
experimental study. Ecotoxicology and
Environmental Safety 69, 130–138.
Nikolaev, S.I., Mitchell, E.A.D., Petrov,
N.B. et al. (2005). The testate lobose
amoebae (order Arcellinida Kent,
1880) finally find their home within
Amoebozoa. Protist 156, 191–202.
O’Malley, M.A. (2007). The nineteenth
century roots of ‘everything is
everywhere’. Nature Reviews
Microbiology 5, 647–651.
Pearce, D.A., Bridge, P.D., Hughes, K.A.
et al. (2009). Microorganisms in the
atmosphere over Antarctica. FEMS
Microbiology Ecology 69, 143–157.
Penard, E. (1902). Faune rhizopodique du
bassin du Léman. Genève: Kündig.
Penard, E. (1938). Les infiniment petits dans
leurs manifestations vitales, pp 1–212.
Genève:€Georg & Cie.
Rowe, G.L., Brantley, S.L., Fernandez, M.
et€al. (1992). Fluid-volcano interaction
in an active stratovolcano€– the crater
lake system of Poás volcano, Costa
Rica. Journal of Volcanology and
Geothermal Research 49, 23–51.
Schröter, D., Wolters, V., De Ruiter, P.C.
(2003). C and N mineralisation in the
decomposer food webs of a European
forest transect. Oikos 102, 294–308.
Slapeta, J., Moreira, D., López-García,€P.
(2005). The extent of protist
diversity:€insights from molecular
ecology of freshwater eukaryotes.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B€–
Biological Sciences 272, 2073–2081.
a r c e l l i n i d a t e s tat e a m o e b a e : € a m o d e l f o r a s s e s s i n g b i o g e o g r a p h y
Smith, H.G., Bobrov, A., Lara, E. (2008).
Diversity and biogeography of
testate amoebae. Biodiversity and
Conservation 17, 329–343.
Smith, H.G., Wilkinson, D.M. (2007). Not
all free-living microorganisms have
cosmopolitan distributions€– the
case of Nebela (Apodera) vas Certes
(Protozoa:€Amoebozoa:€Arcellinida).
Journal of Biogeography 34, 1822–1831.
Todorov, M., Golemansky, V. (2007).
Seasonal dynamics of the diversity and
abundance of the marine interstitial
testate amoebae (Rhizopoda:
Testacealobosia and Testaceafilosia)
in the Black Sea supralittoral. Acta
Protozoologica 46, 169–181.
Van de Vijver, B., Gremmen, N.J.M.,
Beyens, L. (2005). The genus Stauroneis
(Bacillariophyceae) in the Antarctic
region. Journal of Biogeography 32,
1791–1798.
Vanormelingen, P., Verleyen, E.,
Vyverman, W. (2008). The diversity
and distribution of diatoms:€from
cosmopolitanism to narrow endemism.
Biodiversity and Conservation 17,
393–405.
Wanner, M., Xylander, W.E.R. (2005).
Biodiversity development of terrestrial
testate amoebae:€is there any
succession at all? Biology and Fertility
of Soils 41, 428–438.
Webb, S.D. (1991) Ecogeography and
the Great American Interchange.
Paleobiology 17, 266–280.
Wilkinson, D.M. (2010). Have we
underestimated the importance of
humans in the biogeography of freeliving terrestrial microorganisms?
Journal of Biogeography 37, 393–397.
Wilkinson, D.M., Koumoutsaris, S.,
Mitchell, E.A.D., Bey, I. (In prep)
Investigating the aerial distribution of
microorganisms with a model of the
global atmospheric circulation.
Wuthrich, M., Matthey, W. (1980). Les
diatomées de la Tourbière du Cachot
(Jura Neuchâtelois) III. Etude de
l’apport éolien et du transport par les
oiseaux et insectes aquatiques. Swiss
Journal of Hydrology 42, 269–284.
Yeates, G.W., Foissner, W. (1995). Testate
amebas as predators of nematodes.
Biology and Fertility of Soils 20, 1–7.
Zapata, J., Fernández, L. (2008).
Morphology and morphometry
of Apodera vas (Certes, 1889)
(Protozoa:€Testacea) from two
peatlands in Southern Chile. Acta
Protozoologica 47, 389–395.
Zapata, J., Yáñez, M., Rudolph, E. (2008).
Thecamoebians (Protozoa:€Rhizopoda)
of the peatland from Puyehue National
Park (40° 45’S; 72° 19’W), Chile. Gayana
72, 9–17.
129
8
Everything is not everywhere:€the
distribution of cactophilic yeast
Philip F. Ganter
Department of Biological Sciences, Tennessee State University,
Nashville, TN, USA
8.1╇ Introduction
Cactophilic yeast form a community of fungi confined to the necrotic tissues of
�certain species of cacti. Although there is much we do not know about this community, our current understanding has implications for the generality of the
‘Everything is everywhere, but the environment selects’ (EiE) hypothesis (Finlay
and Clarke, 1999; Fenchel and Finlay, 2004a; de Wit and Bouvier, 2006). The
hypothesis of ubiquitous distributions for free-living microbial species is attractive
because it solves a conceptual problem for biologists studying such small organisms:€how do they discover new resource patches when their motion is passive? EiE
provides an answer. Microbes reach such large population sizes that passive dispersal is sufficient to discover a new resource as it becomes available. It is a positive feedback loop. The larger its global population, the more likely a microbe is to
find new resources and the larger its global population will become, increasing its
likelihood of discovering more resources. Microbes that live in a patchy environment can quickly overexploit the patches and must often undergo difficult migrations across inhospitable territory in order to reach the next patch. This is true if
Biogeography of Microscopic Organisms: Is Everything Small Everywhere?, ed. Diego Fontaneto.
Published by Cambridge University Press. © The Systematics Association 2011.
the distribution of cactophilic ye ast
distance, time or both separate patches. As passive agents, they must be resistant
to the stresses inherent in dispersal. For microbes in a patchy habitat, ubiquity is
not only an outcome of large population sizes. It also rests on the assumption of
passive dispersal of resistant life forms, often in the form of resistant spores.
Here, I argue that this life history is not the only one available to free-living microbes
in a patchy environment. I argue that cactophilic yeast distributions are not global
and cactophilic yeast populations do not need to attain large sizes because these yeast
use a different mode of dispersal:€active vectoring by animals. But before I attempt
to discuss the relevance of the association between cactophilic yeast and insects to
assessing the generality of the EiE hypothesis, it will be necessary to describe this
yeast community and to establish the (remarkable) level of endemism found there.
8.2╇ Yeast
Yeast is the collective name given to fungi that have abandoned hyphal growth
and€ adopted unicellular growth (I include here both true unicellularity and
Â�pseudohyphal growth€– growth in short chains of rounded cells, not the elongated
tubes characteristic of true hyphal growth; Crampin et€a l., 2005) (Fig 8.1). The difference between yeast and hyphal fungal lifestyles is a continuum and many examples of dimorphic fungi, those that can switch between hyphal and yeast growth,
are known (Sudbery et€al., 2004). Most of the yeast species thus far described are not
dimorphic but are fully committed to life as a microbe. The two largest fungal clades
(sometimes called the Dikarya) are the Basidiomycota and the Ascomycota, each
of which appears to be monophyletic. Although there is, as of yet, no consensus on
the number, membership or phylogeny of the subclades within each of these large
clades (Hibbett, 2004; Lutzoni et€al., 2004; James et€al., 2006; Spatafora et€al., 2006;
Marcet-Houben and Gabaldón, 2009), enough is known about fungal evolutionary
history to allow some observations relevant to yeast. First, yeast lifestyles are found
in both clades of the Dikarya. Second, all current phylogenies of these two groups
call for multiple origins of the yeast lifestyle and, third, the Saccharomycotina
(=€Hemiascomycetes without the Taphrinomycotina) is the largest monophyletic
yeast clade by far. Most of the yeast analysed here come from Saccharomycotina
with the addition of a few genera belonging to the Basidiomycota.
The second point above is of particular relevance to the EiE hypothesis. If one
accepts that hyphal fungi are macroorganisms (Ferguson et€ al., 2003; Cairney,
2005), then each of those clades in which the yeast lifestyle has been derived from
the ancestral, hyphal lifestyle is an independent origin of unicellularity and is
potentially a test of the generality of the EiE hypothesis. If EiE is a general feature
of small organisms, then it should be adopted upon making the transition from
macro to micro size. Fungi can also be seen as preadapted for conformity with
131
132
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Fig 8.1 Images of the cactophilic system. (A) A saguaro (Carnegiea gigantea) with a rot that
is leaking liquid down the side of the cactus in the northern Sonoran Desert; (B) an Opuntia
fruit rot; (C) a disappointingly healthy Opuntia stricta (inermis) in the Flinders Range, South
Australia; (D) a rotting arm of Stenocereus griseus on the island of Curaçao, Netherland
Antilles; (E) hat-shaped spores (two dehisced asci can be seen) and vegetative cells of Pichia
insulana; (F) P. insulana colonies growing on agar; (G) vegetative cells of Pichia cactophila,
the most common cactophilic yeast. Note:€only E and G are at the same scale.
the EiE hypothesis. Both the Ascomycota and Basidiomycota normally produce
many minute, stress-resistant spores that are often wind or water dispersed. Thus,
finding clades of non-conforming yeast (with respect to EiE) within the fungi may
further our understanding of those situations to which the principle of EiE might
be applied.
8.3╇ Cacti
Although I will focus on yeast confined to cacti, this does not mean confinement
to narrow geographic limits. Cacti are perhaps the most familiar succulent xerophytes. The stem-succulent members of the family are exclusively native to the
Nearctic and Neotropic biogeographic realms and range from southern Canada to
the distribution of cactophilic ye ast
Patagonia and from coastal dunes to the Altiplano wherever soils are well drained
(Anderson, 2001). In addition, humans have carried them to Asia, Africa, Europe
and Australia. Some cacti have established large viable populations in these nonnative habitats and some populations have become invasive (Murray, 1982). Yeast
are found in three places in succulent cacti: in the nectaries of their flowers, in
rotting fruits, and in stem necroses following a breach in the tough outer cuticle.
Stem necroses, often referred to as rot pockets or rots, are active sites of bacterial
and yeast activity (Fogleman and Foster, 1989). They are not found in all species of
cacti. Plant size and stem morphology seem to be the most important determin�
ants of susceptibility to necrosis formation but no definitive studies have been
done on this topic. Stem necroses may quickly heal by isolation of the damaged
tissue through callusing, may persist for long periods if the stem in which they
occur is large, or may even cause the death of the cactus, although this is not common. In some giant Pachycereinae cacti of the Sonoran Desert, stem necroses
may persist so long that liquefied stem tissue drains down the side of the stem and
moistens the soil at the base of the cactus, forming a fourth yeast habitat associated with cacti.
The flowers, fruit rots and stem necroses are visited by many insects (Starmer
et€al., 1988b), some of which breed in them (Heed, 1977a). With the exception of
some stem necroses caused by lepidopteran larvae, insects do not produce the
breaches that initiate stem rots, the habitat that is the focus of this paper. The origin
of stem necroses is not well documented but mammal and bird activities, impacts
due to objects carried by wind and frost damage have been implicated. Often, the
first insects to arrive at rots, whether in stems or fruits, are Drosophila (Fogleman
and Foster, 1989) and there are many species of Drosophila that breed only in cactus stem necroses (Heed, 1982, 1989). One species, Drosophila mettleri, has even
colonised the soil soaked by liquid flowing from Pachycereinae necroses (Heed,
1977b). Cactophilic Drosophila adults deposit cactophilic yeast onto their feeding
substrates through both regurgitation and defecation (Starmer, 1982; Ganter et€a l.,
1986; Ganter, 1988; Fogleman and Foster, 1989).
Cacti are potential oases in a dry landscape. To avoid the exploitation this
attracts, cacti have a range of physical attributes that make it difficult for other
organisms to feed on them. One attribute relevant to the yeast community is the
accumulation of secondary metabolites in their somatic tissues. For those cacti
that form rots, these metabolites range from mucoid polysaccharides to more toxic
compounds such as alkaloids and triterpene glycosides, in concentrations from
trace amounts to 25–40% of a stem’s dry weight for some of the saponins (Kircher,
1982). This variation contributes greatly to heterogeneity in the cactophilic yeast
habitat. Another contributing factor is variation in the amount of free simple
sugars. These are abundant in nectar and fruits and are common in some cactus
stems. However, other cacti bind the majority of simple sugars in their stems to
133
134
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
other molecules and the sugars are available only if secreted microbial enzymes
cleave them free (Kircher, 1982; Fogleman and Abril, 1990). Thus, the habitat for
yeast associated with cacti consists of relatively small, temporary patches that
vary in chemical makeup, persistence and species composition but that have, in
total, a global distribution, especially since cacti have been exported to so many
parts of the world. Patches of suitable habitat are not initiated by the activity of the
microbial community but, once found, are quickly colonised and exploited until
the patch is exhausted. The ecology of the microbial community found in cactus
rots is consistent with the ecology of other free-living microbes. However, microbial colonisation occurs via both passive dispersal (for at least some bacteria) and
vectoring by insects (Fogleman and Foster, 1989).
Before I proceed to a discussion of endemism in cactophilic yeast, it is useful
to examine the degree to which cacti represent a separate yeast habitat and the
evidence for differences among the yeast communities within cacti. Although I
have collected from cacti in many regions, I have not often collected from other
neighbouring habitats at the same time as the cactus collection was done. In many
instances, cactus fruits and flowers were not found on the cacti or were not there
in sufficient abundance that they were collected. However, enough data have been
collected to give some indication of the degree of overlap between cactus stem
necrosis yeast (referred to hence as cactophilic yeast) communities and neighbouring yeast communities (Table 8.1). The tree flux and flower communities in
the table qualify as neighbouring communities for several reasons. They were all
collected within 30 kilometres and two days of the cactus communities to which
they are compared. In addition, all three habitats have insect communities that
feed on and vector the yeast found in them (Ganter et€al., 1986). The insects can
act as a means of isolating (Ganter, 1988) or connecting the habitats (Ganter et€al.,
1986), depending on their behaviours. The metric chosen for the comparison is
proportional overlap (Bloom, 1981; Vegelius et€al., 1986).
There is no objective criterion for comparing proportional overlap measures, but
Table 8.1 shows that there was no overlap between the yeast communities collected
from cacti and Ipomoea flowers in Peru and very little overlap between the yeast
collected from cacti and tree fluxes in either Texas or Arizona. Comparison metrics
of the three communities associated with cacti are more variable and range from
no overlap to values as high as 0.38 for the comparison of stem rots and fruit rots
sampled in Brazil. Starmer et€al. (1988a) collected yeast from Opuntia and fruit rots
in Florida in 1986. The overlap between the stem and fruit communities in their
data was 0.16, smaller than the 0.28 in my data. In order to evaluate these overlap
values, I compare the values in Table 8.1 to overlap values calculated from within
the stem community using collections done at different times and places. The average of the eight comparisons between cactus-yeast communities (stem, fruit and
flower) in Table 8.1 is 0.16. The average overlap between collections of stem rots
the distribution of cactophilic ye ast
Table 8.1 Proportional overlap between cactus and neighbouring habitats.
Cactus
fruits
Cactus
flowers
Ipomoea
flowers
0.06
0.32
0
0
0
Tree
flux
Peru (2002)
Cactus stem rots
Cactus fruits
Cactus flowers
0
Texas, USA
(1998)
Cactus stem rots
0.04
0.06
Cactus fruits
0.02
Northeastern
Brazil (2002)
Cactus stem rots
0.38
Cactus fruits
0.01
0.19
Florida, USA
(1990–1996)
Cactus stem rots
0.28
Arizona, USA
(1986)
Cactus stem rots
0.02
from different species of Opuntia in Texas was 0.57 (n = 8, data not shown). The
average overlap for comparisons of yeast collections from rots in different genera
of cacti (from several regions) was 0.42 (n = 9, data not shown). In evaluating these
numbers, one should keep in mind that the eight comparisons of stem, fruit and
flower collections in Table 8.1 are based on data collected at the same time and in
the same place (often from the same cactus) yet the communities show little evidence of overlap. The comparisons of stem rots were done from collections made
years and many miles apart but yielded much higher similarities. Thus, I conclude
that the cactus yeast community (whether stem, fruit or flower) is isolated from
neighbouring, non-cactus yeast communities and that the cactus stem community is also isolated from cactus fruit and cactus flower communities, although to a
lesser degree than from neighbouring non-cactus yeast communities.
135
136
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
8.4╇ Cactophilic yeast endemism
In this section, I will examine endemism within the cactus stem necrosis community,
which has been sampled far more extensively than either the cactus flower or cactus
fruit necrosis communities. The first evidence for endemism I present is the taxonomic makeup of the community. The basis for this overview is a compilation of data
from two sources:€3451 strains isolated by me (with the help acknowledged below)
and 5159 strains isolated by Dr William T. Starmer and his co-workers (Starmer et€al.,
1990). The total of 8610 strains includes only strains that belong to described taxa
�(species and varieties) or to known taxa that have not been published as of yet. Almost
all come from North and South America, the Caribbean Islands and Australia.
First, I must establish that it is appropriate to combine these two data sets. There
are 106 taxa (102 species and four varieties) in the combined data. Of the 106, 44
occur in both data sets, 26 are found only in my data and 36 are found only in
the Starmer data. However, the 44 species found in common represent 95% of all
8610 strains. The proportional overlap between the two collections is 0.74, a large
value considering that there are differences in the locations and species of cacti
sampled. Based on the degree of overlap and numerical importance of the species
common to both data sets, it seems reasonable to combine the data sets.
Not all yeast found in cactus rots are members of the cactophilic community.
If one assumes that the strains isolated represent both community members and
‘accidentals’, strains that do not normally grow in stem necroses, then elimination
of rare isolates is justified. For this reason, Table 8.2, which presents the combined
data set, includes those 30 taxa with proportional representation over a half per
cent (0.005) of the total. However, this arbitrary criterion is not sufficient, as there
are rare species that must be considered as cactus species in spite of their rareness
because they have never been collected from other habitats. The last eight species
in Table 8.2 are added under this second criterion. The elimination of accidentals
reduces the total number of isolates in the combined data set by less than 5%.
8.4.1╇ Taxonomic analysis of endemism
Of the 38 species in Table 8.2, 25 are found only in the cactophilic habitat, ten
are listed as possible cactophilic species, and three are widespread, occurring
in many habitats. The cactophilic isolates are 82% of the total (excluding the
‘Possible’ category) while the widespread species comprise only 3.5%. Species
for which there is evidence that they are native only to the cactophilic habitat
were placed in the ‘Possible’ group. Galactomyces geotrichum (Naumova et€ al.,
2001), Candida guilliermondii (Vaughan-Martini et€al., 2005), and Cryptococcus
laurentii (Takashima et€ al., 2003; Pohl et€ al., 2006) are known to be complexes
of species and the cactus isolates show some physiological differences from the
standard description (and, for Cr. laurentii, some rDNA sequence difference has
the distribution of cactophilic ye ast
Table 8.2 Taxonomic analysis of 8244 strains isolated from the cactophilic habitat.
‘Cactus’ refers to taxa restricted to the cactophilic habitat, ‘Possible’ to taxa for which
there is evidence that the cactophilic isolates represent separate undescribed species,
and ‘Wide’ to taxa collected from many habitats. The species from the Sporopachydermia
cereana complex are aggregated. P. ‘brazilensis’ is an undescribed variety of P. cactophila.
Taxon
Type
Total
Proportion
of total
Cumulative
proportion
1914
0.2322
0.232
Isolates
8244
Pichia cactophila
Cactus
â•… P. ‘brazilensis’
-
Candida sonorensis
Cactus
1329
0.1612
0.393
Sporopachydermia
cereana complex
Cactus
1049
0.1272
0.521
â•… S. cereana
-
â•… S. australis
-
â•… S. brasilensis
-
â•… S. centralis
-
â•… S. obscura
-
â•… S. opuntiana
-
â•… S. oaxacaensis
-
â•… S. pachycereana
-
â•… S. stenocereana
-
â•… S. trichocereana
-
Clavispora opuntiae
Cactus
643
0.0780
0.599
Pichia kluyveri
Possible
277
0.0336
0.632
Myxozyma mucilagina
Cactus
248
0.0301
0.662
Geotrichum clavatum
Possible
207
0.0251
0.687
Dipodascus starmeri
Cactus
194
0.0235
0.711
Pichia deserticola
Cactus
191
0.0232
0.734
Starmera caribaea
Cactus
166
0.0201
0.754
Pichia angusta-like
Cactus
152
0.0184
0.773
137
138
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Table 8.2 (cont.)
Taxon
Type
Isolates
Proportion
of total
Cumulative
proportion
Starmera
amethionina
Cactus
146
0.0177
0.790
Pichia eremophila
Cactus
131
0.0159
0.806
Cryptococcus albidus
Widespread
125
0.0152
0.821
Candida boidinii
Widespread
124
0.0150
0.836
Pichia mexicana
Possible
121
0.0147
0.851
Rhodotorula
mucilaginosa
Possible
116
0.0141
0.865
Pichia insulana
Cactus
99
0.0120
0.877
Rhodotorula minuta
Possible
98
0.0119
0.899
Galactomyces
geotrichum
Possible
96
0.0116
0.901
Pichia heedii
Cactus
94
0.0114
0.912
Phaffomyces
opuntiae
Cactus
83
0.0101
0.922
Pichia norvegensis
Possible
80
0.0097
0.932
Cryptococcus laurentii
Possible
78
0.0095
0.941
Starmera
pachycereana
Cactus
70
0.0085
0.950
Candida guilliermondii
Possible
68
0.0082
0.958
Candida caseinolytica
Cactus
62
0.0075
0.966
Pichia barkeri
Cactus
60
0.0073
0.973
Debaryomyces
hansenii
Possible
50
0.0061
0.979
Kloeckera apis
Widespread
48
0.0058
0.985
Phaffomyces
thermotolerans
Cactus
29
0.0035
0.988
Pichia
pseudocactophila
Cactus
25
0.0030
0.991
the distribution of cactophilic ye ast
Table 8.2 (cont.)
Starmera
‘australensis’
Cactus
24
0.0029
0.994
Phaffomyces
antillensis
Cactus
20
0.0024
0.997
Candida orba
Cactus
12
0.0015
0.998
Starmera ‘curaçao’
Cactus
9
0.0011
0.999
Pichia
cephalocereana
Cactus
5
0.0006
0.999
Starmera ‘guatemala’
Cactus
1
0.0001
1.000
also been found; Ganter, unpublished data). Pichia norvegensis is a rare human
pathogen (Leask and Yarrow, 1976) in its anamorphic state but is common in
Opuntia rots in some locales and is very likely a cactophilic species (Starmer
et€al., 1990). Anamorphs of Pichia mexicana have been isolated rarely from soil,
fruit and insect-associated habitats (Kurtzman, 1998), but the majority of isolations are from cacti. Variation among the P. mexicana phenotypes found in cacti
suggests that this might be a complex of sibling species (Ganter, unpublished
data). Geotrichum clavatum, Rhodotorula minuta and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa are widely distributed anamorphs with variable physiological profiles. In
all three cases, the strains collected from cacti show consistent differences with
the standard description (Ganter, unpublished data). Although each species
is variable within the cactus habitat, the variations represent separate clusters
and provide evidence that the cactus strains are distinct taxa. One sexual species, Debaryomyces hansenii, is widespread but is noted for phenotypic variation
(Groenewald et€ al., 2008; Jacques et€ al., 2009; Nguyen et€ al., 2009). Differences
between cactophilic isolates and isolates from other habitats and the description
of strains from neighbouring mesquite fluxes as a new species (Phaff et€al., 1998)
suggest that the cactophilic strains of D. hansenii may be a separate species as
well. Of the widely distributed species, both Candida boidinii and Cryptococcus
albidus might have been classified as ‘Possible’ in Table 8.2 but the evidence is not
as clear as for the others. Kloeckera apis is very common in cactus fruit (and acidic
fruits in general) and is probably an accidental from that habitat. Pichia kluyveri
has long been known from both fruit and cactus sources and will be discussed
later as it is a particularly striking example of endemism. Naumov et€al. (1997a)
presented evidence that the cactophilic strains of Pichia angusta (once Hansenula
polymorpha, now Ogataea polymorpha) were a separate species but did not formally describe the new species and Table 8.2 lists them as cactus yeast.
139
140
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
There are two cactophilic species not in the Starmer–Ganter combined data.
Dipodascus australiensis and D. spicifer are known from only a few specimens but
both appear to be cactophilic (von Arx, 1977; de Hoog et€a l., 1986). The latter species
was described from a single isolate from an Opuntia rot in Arizona and the former
from three isolates found in Opuntia rots from Australia and South Africa plus
one isolate from a rot in Euphorbia ingens, also from South Africa. It is not known
why they are absent from the combined collection. Ongoing analysis of strains
from this group (Dipodascus is closely related to Galactomyces and Geotrichum;
Kurtzman and Robnett, 1995) collected in South America has uncovered several
taxa related to but distinctly separate from both D. australiensis and D. spicifer
(Antonielli, Cardinali and Ganter, unpublished data), which reinforces the claim
that D. australiensis and D. spicifer are cactophilic species.
The conclusion from this taxonomic analysis is clear:€the cactophilic habitat is
dominated by species found only in cactus rots, although it is not closed and yeast
from other habitats occur regularly but rarely. The dominance of cactus-specific
species will probably become more complete as more taxonomically relevant
sequences are examined in those taxa listed as ‘Possible’ in Table 8.2 and as isolates currently listed as ‘unknowns’ (332 in both data sets) are examined for new
taxa. EiE posits that microbial habitats should be species poor (at the global scale)
compared with macrobial habitats (Fenchel and Finlay, 2004b), but the cactophilic
habitat is rich in endemic species, as rich as the insect community associated with
the resource. A closer examination of the cactophilic community (sections 8.4.2
and 8.4.3 below) will show that narrow endemism is very common. Here, narrow
endemism means geographic distributions restricted to a subset of locales in which
suitable cacti are found. Thus, narrow endemism means that a species is absent
from a portion of its niche (the niche according to Grinnell). Narrow endemism is
a violation of EiE because EiE permits no geographic restrictions to a species’ distribution. Wherever the habitat is found so should those microbes able to exploit
it (‘the habitat selects’). Of the 25 cactophilic taxa, only three have ever been considered ubiquitous within the habitat:€Pichia cactophila, Candida sonorensis and
Sporopachydermia cereana. Sporopachydermia cereana has already been shown
to be a complex of similar, closely related species (Lachance et€al., 2001b), all with
restricted geographic ranges. In Table 8.2, all of the cactophilic Sporopachydermia
strains have been lumped together. I could not separate the strains that I had not
isolated into their proper species because I did not have access to the original
physiological profiles and rDNA sequences are not available. For those strains
in my collection, rDNA sequence information is only available for a few strains
and those few sequences are not close matches to previously published S. cereana complex sequences. In addition, many unsequenced strains in my collection
have physiological profiles that do not match those described by Lachance et€al.
(2001b), indicating that there may be more species in the complex than presently
the distribution of cactophilic ye ast
described. The Sporopachydermia cereana complex, once thought to be a single
species, is an outstanding example of narrow geographic endemism within the
cactophilic habitat. This leaves two ‘ubiquitous’ species and I will discuss the ubiquity of P. cactophila and C. sonorensis in the last portion of this section.
8.4.2╇ Narrow endemism within the cactophilic habitat
Initially, the hat-spored, cactophilic yeast species (which includes almost all of
the sexual cactophilic yeast species) were described as Pichia membranifaciens,
a polymorphic member of the once large genus Pichia (eight of the 11 positive
assimilation abilities vary among strains in the description of P. membranifaciens).
Correlations between habitat, geography and physiology led to the description of
a set of new cactophilic species. The newly described cactophilic Pichia species
had an unusually large range of mol G+C% values (from 27% to 48%) and Starmer
et€a l. (1986) found that the mol G+C content of their DNA had a pattern:€cactophilic
Pichia species were clustered into groups spaced at intervals of 3% (the 30%, 33%
and 36% groups were the most speciose). Ribosomal DNA sequence data has since
been used to separate most of the members of the 33% group into two endemic
cactophilic genera (Yamada et€al., 1997, 1999). Although the new genera were not
closely related to Pichia or to one another, the rDNA data confirmed that withinclade relationships were close. I will examine three of these lineages as examples
of very narrow geographic endemism common among cactophilic yeast.
One observation is germane here. Since their description, no strain of any of the
species that were originally thought to be P. membranifaciens has been isolated
from a habitat that was not necrotic plant tissue and physically close to a population of cacti containing the species. For instance, some endemic cactophilic
species have been isolated (always rarely) from tree sap fluxes in Arizona but sap
fluxes in Canada do not contain any accidental cactophilic species. There is one
possible exception and its distribution is a bit of a mystery. Pichia norvegensis was
first identified in its anamorphic state as a cause of vaginitis (most cases reported
are from Europe; Leask and Yarrow, 1976). Extensive sampling of humans shows
that we are a very rare host for this species. One strain from a pig’s gut and several strains from cheese (also European) widen its habitat somewhat. Although it
was never mistaken for P. membranifaciens, it has been isolated from cacti (mostly
Opuntia and members of the Cereeae) over 80 times in both North and South
America. There are many more isolates from cacti than from all other habitats
combined. Because of its odd distribution, it is listed as a possible cactophilic species in Table 8.2. Genetic variation among the isolates has not been investigated
but might shed light on a very disjunct distribution.
Starmera. There are six taxa in the Starmera group (Table 8.3). The genus
Starmera was proposed in 1997 for a cactophilic Pichia species, P. amethionina,
with two varieties and a divergent rDNA sequence (Yamada et€al., 1997). A second
141
142
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Table 8.3 Relatedness within the cactophilic G+C groups for Starmera (a), Phaffomices
(b) and Pichia (c). The upper triangle has DNA-DNA reassociation values and the lower
triangle has hybrid spore viabilities. a, b, 33 mol% G+C Species; c, 30 mol% G+C Species.
Sources are listed at the bottom of the table. Spaces indicate that no data are available.
Pichia heedii has 33 mol% G+C, but shows only background homology with either
Starmera or Phaffomyces species. Pichia barkeri has 36 mol% G+C, but has a remarkably
high DNA-DNA homology of 20% with P. kluyveri.
(a)
Starmera
S. am
S. pa
S. ca
S. au
S. amethionina
-
65–85%
40%
87%
S. pachycereana
51%
-
37%
64%
S. caribaea
0%
0%
-
S. ‘australensis’
S. cu
S. gu
-
S. ‘curaçao’
-
S. ‘guatemala’
-
(b)
Phaffomyces
Ph. op.
Ph. th.
Ph. an
C. or.
Ph. opuntiae
-
28–34%
55%
27%
-
26%
52%
-
24%
Ph. thermotolerans
Ph. antillensis
-
Candida orba
(c)
Pichia
P. kluyveri
P. eremophila
P. cephalocereana
C. eremophila
P. kluyveri
-
66%
72%
64%
P. eremophila
30%
-
69%
94%
P. cephalocereana
81%
39%
-
70%
Candida eremophila
-
Starmera sources:€Starmer et al. (1978, 1980), Holzschu and Phaff (1982), Phaff et al. (1992);
Phaffomyces sources:€Starmer et al. (1979, 1984, 2001), Holzschu et al. (1985); Pichia
sources:€Phaff et al. (1987a, 1987b), Kurtzman et al. (2008).
the distribution of cactophilic ye ast
cactophilic Pichia species, now S. caribaea, was transferred to the genus later
(Yamada et€al., 1999). Kurtzman et€al. (2008), using concatenated gene sequences,
has placed two other Pichia species (P. quercuum and P. dryadoides) in the genus,
but the bootstrap support for this expanded clade is low while the support for the
cactophilic subclade is 100%. For our purposes, Starmera refers to just the cactophilic members of the clade. Three of the six members are described species and
three are not. In the case of S. ‘australensis’, evidence for it being a valid species is
found in Holzschu et€al. (1985). For the remaining two, support for their inclusion
as separate species is based on differences between them and the other Starmera
taxa in both physiological profile and sequence of the D1/D2 region of the LSU
rDNA genes (Ganter, unpublished data).
Starmera is found in almost every region and cactus type (Table 8.4). All of the
taxa within the genus are distributed almost without overlap and are, for this reason, narrowly endemic species. Instances where only one strain in a locale was
found on an unexpected cactus type have been ignored because there is variation in some of the key taxonomic physiological abilities and, in no case, had
sequencing been done to corroborate the unexpected occurrence. The only exception to the no-overlap rule is that both S. pachycereana and S. amethionina are
found on Opuntia in the Sonoran Desert and in West Texas. This overlap may
occur on Opuntia because it is not the preferred host cactus for either species.
Although more Opuntia rots have been sampled in the Sonoran Desert and West
Texas than any other cactus type, S. amethionina has been isolated more often
from Stenocereinae than Opuntia rots and S. pachycereana more often from
Pachycereinae than Opuntia rots, so the overlap on Opuntia is not on the primary
resource of either species.
Phaffomyces. Four species are currently recognised in the Phaffomyces clade
(Table 8.3). Average DNA–DNA reassociation values are lower among Phaffomyces
taxa than among Starmera taxa. Mating between Phaffomyces species is complicated by the reluctance of Ph. thermotolerans to mate with itself. For this reason,
no spore viability data are available (Table 8.3). Starmer et€ al. (1979) concluded
that Ph. thermotolerans is normally haploid, a situation found in other cactophilic
yeast. A haplontic lifestyle may also be the reason that Candida orba is a member of Candida rather than Phaffomyces, although clearly in the Phaffomyces clade
(evidence from similarity of rDNA gene sequences and physiologies). While no
strain of C. orba will mate with another C. orba strain or with the mating types of
any Phaffomyces species, all C. orba strains show initial mating reactions and conjugate with the h+ mating type of P. antillensis (no spores are produced), although
there is only 24% DNA–DNA homology between them (Table 8.3), a value so low
as to preclude conspecificity. As only a handful of C. orba strains have ever been
isolated, we may simply not have isolated the h− mating type as of yet. This problem may be exacerbated if most strains belong to a single mating type, as can
143
144
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Table 8.4 The distribution of species in the genera Starmera (a) and Phaffomyces (b).
X indicates that the cactus type either does not occur in the region or that it never or
very rarely hosts a stem necrosis and N indicates that the cactus type has not been
investigated in the region. Spaces are locales where no member of the yeast group has
been found, although the host plant is present. The host cacti have been divided into
chemically distinct types where possible:€Opuntia, Pachycereinae and Stenocereinae€–
the last two are divisions of the Pachycereae (Gibson, 1982). The ‘Other Col.’ category
includes columnar cacti in several families including Cereeae, Cacteae, Trichocereae
and Notocactaceae (taxonomy according to Anderson, 2001). In addition, the ‘Other Col.’
category includes hosts from the Pachycereae for which no biochemical analysis has been
done. The category ‘Caribbean Islands’ does not include the island of Curaçao.
(a) Starmera
Locale
Opuntia
Stenocereinae
Pachycereinae
Other Col.
Sonoran
Desert
S. amethionina
S. amethionina
S. pachycereana
X
West Texas
S. amethionina
X
X
X
East Texas
S. caribaea
X
X
X
Florida
S. caribaea
X
X
X
Caribbean
Islands
S. caribaea
S. caribaea
S. caribaea
S. caribaea
Curaçao
S. ‘curaçao’
S. ‘curaçao’
S. ‘curaçao’
X
Guatemala
N
S. ‘guatemala’
N
Brazil
S. amethionina
S. amethionina
S. amethionina
X
X
Peru
S. amethionina
N
Australia
S. ‘australensis’
X
(b) Phaffomyces
Locale
Opuntia
Stenocereinae
Sonoran Desert
Pachycereinae
Other Col.
Ph. thermotolerans X
West Texas
X
X
X
East Texas
X
X
X
Florida
X
X
X
Caribbean Islands
Ph. antillensis
the distribution of cactophilic ye ast
Table 8.4 (cont.)
Curaçao
X
Guatemala
N
Brazil
Peru
Australia
N
Ph. opuntiae,
Candida orba
X
Ph. ‘peru’
X
X
be the case for Clavispora opuntiae (Rosa et€al., 1992; Lachance et€al., 1994) and
Kurtzmaniella cleridarum (Lachance and Starmer, 2008).
The distribution of Phaffomyces species is even narrower than the distribution of
Starmera species (Table 8.4). Phaffomyces is absent from many regions and cactus
types within regions. Ph. thermotolerans is found only in Sonoran Pachycereinae
rots, Ph. antillensis only in Cereeae rots from islands in the northern Caribbean
region. The only case of overlap occurs between Ph. opuntiae and C. orba on
Opuntia in Australia, where cacti are not native and have been there less than 230
years (Dodd, 1940). The most obvious explanation is that both species of yeast were
imported from either the Nearctic or Neotropical realms, although their regions
of origin are not known. Invasive cacti can be a severe economic problem and the
Australian government scoured native cactus habitats for potential agents of biological control and shipped many cactus specimens to Australia (Dodd, 1940). So
far, sampling from the new world has produced no strains with the standard Ph.
opuntiae physiological profile. Several strains similar to Ph. opuntiae have been
collected from Peru and the Sonoran Desert with single strains isolated in the
Caribbean and Venezuela. All of these strains are phenotypically distinct from
the Ph. opuntiae found in Australia and sequencing of the Peruvian strains indicates they are a new, undescribed species. Although Ph. opuntiae occurs widely in
Australia and is often common in Australian cactus rots, no strains of C. orba have
been found anywhere other than within 100 km of Brisbane, Australia. However,
much of South America is either not yet sampled or is undersampled. Until the
origins of these two species are understood, it is impossible to tell if their overlap
is due to their recent import into Australia or occurs in the species’ native range.
No matter how this is resolved, this cactophilic genus consists of narrow endemics that are most often rare where they do occur. Many regions have no member
of this group, although suitable host plants are present. EiE has no explanation for
the absence of Phaffomyces from so many cacti and locations.
Pichia kluyveri. Many of the cactophilic yeast are still in the genus Pichia,
although many species have been transferred out of the genus (Kurtzman and
145
146
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Robnett, 2010). Within the cactophilic Pichia, two cases of narrow endemism
occur. One case is that of Pichia kluyveri and its relatives. This species is, at this
time, unique in that there is no doubt that it occurs as a regular member of the
cactophilic community but is not confined to it. Pichia kluyveri is well known
from rotting acidic fruits worldwide. Starmer et€a l. (1992) collected P. kluyveri from
halved tomatoes exposed to insects at 15 locations across the USA. Only the northernmost locations (in Maine and northern New York state) failed to yield multiple
strains of P. kluyveri. Enough strains of P. kluyveri from the cactus community have
been sequenced to establish that at least some of the strains in cacti are identical
to P. kluyveri from acidic fruit collected outside of the geographic range of cacti
(Ganter, unpublished data). This is the only case where sequence data have confirmed the identity of cactophilic and non-cactophilic strains. Such investigations
have so often yielded evidence for separate cactophilic taxa that it is reasonable
to be cautious of relying on the similarity of physiological profiles as presumptive
evidence for conspecificity when the strains come from both cactophilic and noncactophilic habitats (von Arx, 1977; Naumov et€al., 1997a; Phaff et€al., 1997, 1998).
The distribution of P. kluyveri within the cactophilic habitat is only partially
known. The problem arises from the likelihood that some strains identified as
P. kluyveri may actually be distinct taxa. This possibility was first noticed when
collections in North America and the Caribbean yielded locale- or host-related
phenotypic variation (Phaff et€al., 1987a). From this observation, two varieties of
P. kluyveri were described (recently elevated to species status by Kurtzman et€al.,
2008):€P. cephalocereana, from Caribbean columnar cacti, and P. eremophila, from
Opuntia cladodes in the northern Sonoran and Chihuahuan Deserts. Anamorphic
strains of P. eremophila were found in Sonoran Stenocereinae rots. These strictly
cactophilic taxa are narrowly endemic species related to (and, perhaps, derived
from) the cosmopolitan species P. kluyveri. However, isolations of P. kluyveri-like
strains from cacti since the description of P. cephalocereana and P. eremophila
have complicated the situation. The diagnostic differences between the taxa (ability to ferment glucose, ability to kill a standard strain of Candida glabrata, host
preference and geographic origin) are sufficient to separate these taxa when collecting from the same region and species of cacti from which P. eremophila and
P. cephalocereana were described but will not suffice to identify strains collected
from new host plants or from new locales. Almost all possible combinations of
the diagnostic characters have appeared in collections. The recent sequence analysis that confirmed the presence of cosmopolitan P. kluyveri strains in cacti also
revealed two divergent strains that are probably new species, although all of the
strains tested had the physiological profile of standard P. kluyveri (Ganter, unpublished data). Thus, identification requires sequencing in this group, something not
regularly done when the data presented here were collected. The only conclusion
possible is that the P. kluyveri clade has a cosmopolitan distribution within the
the distribution of cactophilic ye ast
cactophilic habitat but, until more sequence data are collected, it is not possible to
separate what may be several individual, narrowly endemic taxa.
This scenario is consistent with the only study of genetic variation in the P. kluyveri group (Ganter and de Barros Lopes, 2000). Between-strain random amplified
polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP)
variation was so great that few monomorphic bands were detected by either
method. Strains analysed included members of each taxon (now species, then varieties) and some strains not classifiable by phenotypic determination. The results
showed that some strains with the same physiological profile were not closely
related. The most important predictor of relatedness was geographic origin.
Kurtzman et€al. (2008) placed P. kluyveri, P. cephalocereana and P. eremophila in
a well-supported clade with P. barkeri, P. heedii and P. nakasei. All of these species
are associated either with rotting cacti, rotting fruit or both. Only P. nakasei has not
been isolated from a cactus rot. Pichia barkeri, listed as a cactophilic species, has
never been a dominant yeast in any collection and has been isolated from cactus
fruit rots, which might indicate that it is not strictly cactophilic. All six members of
the clade are oligotrophic and have similar physiological profiles. Pichia nakasei, the
only species not associated with cacti, is most divergent from the ‘average’ phenotype for the clade and Kurtzman et€al. (2008) place it basal to the rest of the clade. If,
as more loci and more cactophilic strains are sequenced, P. nakasei remains basal,
then it is reasonable to hypothesise that there is a cactophilic ‘kluyveri’ niche for
strains having the correct phenotype and that the niche is filled in different geographic regions by independently evolving lineages from this clade. The alternative
to this hypothesis is that the similarity of phenotypes is a consequence of phylogenetic inertia. However, there is some evidence for the former hypothesis. Pichia
barkeri has a physiological profile as close to P. kluyveri as either P. cephalocereana
or P.€eremophila, yet it’s DNA–DNA reassociation value is only 21% with P. kluyveri
(Phaff et€al., 1987b), a value much lower than the value for either P. eremophila or
P.€cephalocereana (Table 8.3). Moreover, P. barkeri has a mol% G+C DNA composition of 36%, far from the 30% values for P. kluyveri, P. cephalocereana and P. eremophila. Pichia heedii and P. nakasei have intermediate values of 33%. Thus, the
P. kluyveri-like taxa have physiological profiles more similar than their relatedness
would predict, which indicates adaptation to a niche in the cactophilic environment, not phylogenetic inertia. Genome-wide comparisons of these lineages will be
necessary to elucidate the reason or reasons for the magnitude of the variation in
proportional nucleotide composition for such closely related organisms.
8.4.3╇ Geographic variation within ubiquitous cactophilic species
The only yeast in the cactophilic habitat that might merit description as ubiquitous are Pichia cactophila and Candida sonorensis, which account for about
40% of all cactophilic isolates (Table 8.2). Both are found on all host types and
147
148
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
from all locales, with one notable exception, discussed below. Both are amictic,
although the details differ. No spores have been detected in any C. sonorensis
isolates, although each of the 1300+ strains collected so far has been examined
for spores as a routine part of the identification procedure. Pichia cactophila
strains often produce spores but almost always two large spores per ascus.
Although the genetics have not been investigated, the assumption is that meiosis occurs in P. cactophila but mating takes place within the ascus, producing
two diploid spores and preventing outcrossing. Here, I will demonstrate that
these two species and another widespread but far less common asexual species, Myxozyma mucilagina, show significant levels of genetic variation linked
to geographic origin of the strain. In these amictic species with less phenotypic
variation than genetic variation, the existence of local lineages is evidence for
narrow endemism.
Endemism at the species level has already been described for P. cactophila. In
two locales (the Sonoran Desert and Curaçao, N.A.) strains were found with four
spores instead of the expected two. The Sonoran four-spored strains have been
described as P. pseudocactophila (Holzschu et€al., 1983) and the Caribbean fourspored strains as P. insulana (Ganter et€al., 2010). In neither case has a reliable
physiological test been found that will distinguish P. pseudocactophila or P.€insulana from P. cactophila. In the Sonoran Desert, P. cactophila and P. pseudocactophila divide the habitat by host type. Sporogenous Pichia pseudocactophila are
found on Pachycereinae cacti. Although only a few sequences have been obtained,
it appears that the asporogenous strains from that host type are also P.€pseudocactophila (M.-A. Lachance, unpublished data). In the Caribbean, P. �cactophila
and P. insulana divide the habitat by geography. On Curaçao, sequences from
both sporogenous and asporogenous strains are P. insulana and occur on
Stenocereinae, Pachycereinae and Opuntia hosts. A few asporogenous P. insulana strains have been identified from other Caribbean islands but they appear
rare outside of Curaçao and are not confined to a single host type. Unfortunately,
no strains from Venezuela have been sequenced, so it is not known if Curaçao is
the only location dominated by P. insulana. So, two narrowly endemic species
related to P. cactophila are already known and separate collections in eastern
South America by W.T. Starmer (personal communication) and me contain a
physiological variant of P. cactophila that may represent a third sibling species.
The distributions of P. pseudocactophila and P. insulana are not consistent with
EiE. Each is restricted within very narrow geographic limits (P. insulana common
only on Curaçao and P. pseudocactophila only in the northern Sonoran Desert)
and P. pseudocactophila is found on only a subset of suitable hosts within its limited geographic range.
The large number of P. cactophila without unusual phenotypes still constitutes a potentially ubiquitous cactophilic species. However, RAPD variation was
the distribution of cactophilic ye ast
extensive within the species in a study of 32 strains from different regions and
host types (Ganter and Quarles, 1997). There were 133 polymorphic bands from
eight primers and each band was found in an average of nine of the 32 P. cactophila
strains. Principal component analysis of this variation produced strong support
for geographic location as the most important predictor of RAPD variation. Not
all regions were represented in this study (strains came from Florida, Antigua,
Argentina, Australia and the Sonoran Desert), but the distance effect was important enough that it was possible to separate strains from north and south Florida.
Sequence data are not available for these strains, but many produced two-spored
asci and these can be assumed to be P. cactophila. As there was no evidence in the
RAPD data that the two-spored strains differed from the asporogenous strains, it
is probable that these were also P. cactophila. Although P. cactophila is a cosmopolitan cactophilic yeast, its population genetic structure is consistent with narrow endemism, not EiE.
Proponents of EiE contend that there is no significance to geographically linked
neutral genetic variation. If the phenotypes are identical, what does it matter
that neutral variation is linked to geography? The regional differences in P. cactophila strains are not simply neutral variation but have phenotypic and ecological �consequences. Many yeast secrete proteins that are toxic to other yeast.
This phenomenon is labelled killing and the proteins are collectively referred to
as killer factors (Magliani et€al., 1997). Because the killing spectrum for a particular toxin can be quite narrow, Ganter and Quarles (1997) cross-tested all of their
P.€cactophila strains for their ability to kill one another. Although P. cactophila is
not generally known as a killer yeast, some strains were able to kill conspecifics.
When variation in this important ecological character was analysed, geographic
location was once again the most important explanatory variable. The separation
of Florida into separate geographic regions was also evident in the killer factor
data. Some of the north Florida strains were able to kill but they killed only strains
from south Florida. Thus, strains with the ‘P. cactophila phenotype’ consist of both
sibling species and a large number of regionally divided amictic lineages. This is
not the EiE scenario. Under EiE, there should be no geographic component to genetic variation, no isolation by distance.
Genetic variation tied to collection locale is also present in both C. sonorensis
and M. mucilagina. Both are asexual but C. sonorensis is more widely distributed,
occurring in as many locales and hosts as P. cactophila. Myxozyma mucilagina
is more common in North America than South America and is mostly confined
to Opuntia and Stenocereinae rots. Variation in several traits has been measured
in a set of strains from both species. For C. sonorensis, variation in RAPD profile,
physiological profile, karyotype and locale (entered as distance from other locales)
was recorded for 36 strains from a limited number of locales (Australia, Florida
and Texas). All were from Opuntia rots. While there was little variation among
149
150
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Table 8.5 Comparison of between-strain variation for several characters for two amictic
cactophilic yeast with wide distributions, C. sonorensis (a) and M. mucilagina (b)
(Mantel’s R in the upper diagonal, probability of getting a greater R from randomised
data in the lower diagonal). The C. sonorensis data are from Ganter et al. (2004) and
the M. mucilagina data have not been published before. The methodology used for the
M.€mucilagina data is identical to that in Ganter et al. (2004).
(a) Candida sonorensis
RAPD
Physiological profile
Karyotype
Distance
RAPD
-
0.26
0.27
0.26
Physiological
profile
0.01
-
0.08
0.17
Karyotype
0.05
NS
-
0.99
Distance
0.05
NS
0.001
-
RAPD
Physiological profile
Karyotype
Distance
RAPD
-
0.33
0.40
0.25
Physiological
profile
0.001
-
0.18
0.67
Karyotype
0.001
0.01
-
0.25
Distance
0.05
0.001
0.001
-
(b) Myxozyma mucilagina
strains’ physiological profiles, variation for both karyotype and RAPD profiles was
considerable (Ganter et€al., 2004). Both measures of genetic variation correlated
with distance (Table 8.5).
An effect of geography is also evident in variation among M. mucilagina strains.
Twenty-two strains from the Sonoran and Chihuahuan Deserts, Florida and
Australia were studied for variation in (Ganter, unpublished data, Table 8.6). These
strains represented more locales and hosts than were included in the C. sonorensis
study. The genetic and physiological variation was a bit larger as well. Genome size
varied from four to seven chromosomes and from 4.35 to 8.8 Mb. Table 8.7 shows
a complex history of chromosomal variation. Once again, Mantel comparison of
the similarity matrices demonstrated significant correlation between genetic variation (RAPD and karyotype), physiological variation and geographic origin (Table
8.5). Myxozyma mucilagina is another widespread asexual species that consists of a
set of local lineages. In fact, there is no genetic evidence at this time for significant
the distribution of cactophilic ye ast
Table 8.6 Strains of Myxozyma mucilagina assayed for variation in physiological profile,
RAPD profile and karyotype.
#
Collection
Number
Host Plant
Region
Locale
1
91–503.2
Opuntia sp.
Sonoran
Desert
Baja California, Mexico
2
91–511.5
Ferrocactus sp.
Sonoran
Desert
Baja California, Mexico
3
91–519.4
Stenocereus
gummosus
Sonoran
Desert
Baja California, Mexico
4
91–527.4
Stenocereus
gummosus
Sonoran
Desert
Baja California, Mexico
5
91–529.6
Stenocereus
gummosus
Sonoran
Desert
Baja California, Mexico
6
91–535.3
Stenocereus
gummosus
Sonoran
Desert
Baja California, Mexico
7
91–629.4
Opuntia
phaeacantha
Sonoran
Desert
Tucson, AZ
8
91–813.3
Opuntia lindheimeri
Chihuahuan
Desert
Mason County, TX
9
91–843.3
Opuntia engelmannii
Chihuahuan
Desert
Big Bend National
Park, TX
10
91–890.4
Opuntia engelmannii
Chihuahuan
Desert
Davis Mountains, TX
11
91–891.5
Opuntia engelmannii
Chihuahuan
Desert
Davis Mountains, TX
12
93–115.3
Opuntia stricta
Florida
Canaveral National
Seashore
13
93–124.5
Opuntia humifisa
Florida
Archbold Biological
Station
14
93–125.5
Opuntia humifisa
Florida
Archbold Biological
Station
15
94–153.4
Opuntia engelmannii
Chihuahuan
Desert
Davis Mountains, TX
16
94–162.4
Opuntia engelmannii
Chihuahuan
Desert
Davis Mountains, TX
151
152
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Table 8.6 (cont.)
#
Collection
Number
17
Host Plant
Region
Locale
96–125.3
Opuntia stricta
(inermis)
Australia
Hemmant, QLD
18
96–125.6
Opuntia stricta
(inermis)
Australia
Hemmant, QLD
19
96–131.5
Opuntia tomentosa
Australia
Marburg/Minden, QLD
20
96–162.4
Opuntia tomentosa
Australia
Brigalow, QLD
21
96–172.4
Opuntia tomentosa
Australia
Ban Ban Springs, QLD
22
96–172.5
Opuntia tomentosa
Australia
Ban Ban Springs, QLD
phenotypic or genotypic variation from a widely distributed cactophilic yeast that is
not tied to either locale or host type.
8.4.4╇ Summary and alternative hypothesis
In summary, I have provided evidence that (1) the cactophilic habitat is separate from neighbouring yeast habitats, that (2) most species native to it are narrow
endemics and that (3) those species with wider distributions are, in fact, asexual
species consisting of a set of regionally based variant lineages (i.e. geographic
races). Why are these microbes local and not ubiquitous? The answer is found in
their relationship with animals:€a relationship that results in the yeast’s biogeography resembling that of their animal vectors.
Before leaving this section, I wish to examine an alternative to the conclusion
that endemism is linked to geography. In the cactophilic system, geography and
host type are partially confounded. Some locales have only one host plant present. If all locales had a unique host type, it would be impossible to separate the
effect of host and geography and one could explain geographic variation as simply
an example of ‘but the environment selects’, the phrase that qualifies ‘everything
is everywhere’. Finlay and Fenchel, arguing for ubiquitous dispersal of microbes,
warn against mistaking local habitat availability for localised dispersal (Finlay,
2002; Finlay and Fenchel, 2002). Under this alternative hypothesis, cactophilic
yeast distributions are restricted not by geography but by exclusion from cacti that
fail to supply vital nutrients or contain toxic secondary chemicals. There are several reasons to reject the explanation that cactophilic narrow endemism is due to
chemical differences among host plants. First, there is evidence that most cacti
will support the growth of almost all cactophilic yeast species. This conclusion
the distribution of cactophilic ye ast
comes from a simple experiment testing growth by cactus type. For Opuntia,
Stenocereinae, Pachycereinae, plus some Cereeae and Cacteae hosts, sterile Petri
dishes with medium consisting of 49% wt./vol. ground cactus stem tissue, 49 wt./
vol. water, and 2% agar were inoculated using replica plating with 21 cactophilic
species at low density. Growth was assessed only roughly by the size of the colony.
While growth was generally slower in some cactus types than others, in no case
was growth of any cactophilic species prevented. This does not mean that host
tissue chemistry has no influence on the community of yeast that exploit it but it
does mean that the qualifying phrase in the EiE hypothesis, ‘but the environment
selects’, is not a sufficient explanation for the absence of cactophilic species when
suitable cacti are present. Second, some yeast species are found in all host types
within a region but not outside of the region although suitable hosts occur there
(e. g. Starmera caribaea (Table 8.4) and P. insulana). EiE predicts that these suitable hosts should have the missing yeast. The third argument against habitat variation as the explanation for endemism in cactophilic yeast expands the definition
of habitat beyond host chemistry to include yeast community interactions as part
of ‘environment’. If everything were everywhere, but host type by yeast community interactions favoured particular yeast in particular communities, then there
should be no spaces in Table 8.4. Some member of a clade should fill the niche
associated with the clade in all situations where the hosts are present but this is
not so and the explanation is a failure of clades to successfully disperse throughout their potential niches.
8.5╇ Yeast and Drosophila
Repeated attempts have been made to recover cactophilic yeast from desiccated
rots (Ganter, unpublished data). In no case has the attempt yielded a viable yeast
strain. Sterile Petri dishes containing rich medium that are exposed to the air in
either temperate forest (Gilbert, 1980) or desert (Ganter, unpublished data) habitats
are colonised by bacteria and filamentous fungi but not by yeast. How, then, do yeast
colonise cactus rots? The answer is, of course, that yeast are brought to rot pockets
by arthropods that feed on the rotting plant tissue. There is a rich literature on the
many associations between animals and yeast (reviewed in Phaff and Starmer, 1987;
Ganter, 2006). Necrotic rot pockets are home to many species of insect that carry
yeast on their surfaces (sometimes in structures specialised for storage of microbes)
and in their crops and guts (Starmer et€al., 1988b). In the cactophilic system, attention has been focused on the relationship between yeast and Drosophila, which are
often the first insects to arrive at the newly damaged host tissue (Fogleman, 1982).
The role of yeast in the diet of Drosophila has been recognised for many years
(Baumberger, 1917, 1919; Sang, 1956, 1978; Begon, 1981). The flies and their
153
154
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Table 8.7 Karyotypes of 22 M. mucilagina strains (from Table 8.6). Chromosome size from
650 to 2300. Number corresponds to the # column in Table 8.6. N:€haploid chromosome
number. Host type abbreviations:€O:€Opuntia, C:€Ferrocactus and S:€Stenocereinae.
Region abbreviations:€B:€Baja California, S:€northern Sonoran Desert, T:€Texas (northern
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Host
Type
O
C
S
S
S
S
O
O
O
O
Region
B
B
B
B
B
B
S
T
T
T
N
6
5
7
6
5
5
5
4
4
5
Genome
(KB)
8800
6800 8150 6950
4850
4850
5350
4250
5300 5150
650
700
X
X
X
X
X
X
750
X
X
X
800
X
X
X
850
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
900
950
X
X
1000
1050
X
1100
X
X
X
1150
1200
X
X
X
X
1250
1300
X
X
1350
1400
1450
1500
1550
1600
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
the distribution of cactophilic ye ast
155
Chihuahuan Desert), F:€Florida and A:€Australia. Genome sizes are sums of chromosomal
sizes. Chromosomes are marked with an X corresponding to the molecular weight of the band.
Data from contour-clamped homogeneous electric field (CHEF) analysis (methodology used is
identical to that in Ganter et al., 2004).
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
T
F
F
F
T
T
A
A
A
A
A
A
4
4
4
4
6
5
6
4
6
6
4
5
4350
5350
5650
5700
8250
6700
7600
5300
8450
8450
5700 6050
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
156
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Table 8.7 (cont.)
Number
1
2
X
X
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1650
1700
1750
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
X
2050
2100
2150
X
2200
2250
X
X
X
X
2300
associated yeast communities differ among habitats (Heed et€al., 1976; Lachance
et€al., 1995; Morais et€al., 1995; Rosa et€al., 1995). Here, I will review what is known
of the association between these two groups within the cactophilic system.
Like yeast, Drosophila species found in rot pockets are narrowly endemic
(Fellows and Heed, 1972; Heed, 1982). The relationship between cactus and fly has
been most intensively studied in the Sonoran cactophilic Drosophila (Heed, 1977a).
Cactophilic Drosophila partition the environment by both cactus type (Heed, 1977a)
and by geographic region for widespread cactus types like Opuntia (Ruiz and Heed,
1988). In some cases, differences in cactus stem chemistry are the reason for habitat
partitioning. Drosophila pachea must breed in Lophocereus schottii rots because of
its dietary requirement for a sterol found only in this cactus but has no congeneric
competitors for L. schottii, its only host plant, as the other Sonoran Drosophila species are sensitive to the toxic effects of alkaloids found only in this cactus (Kircher,
1982). Other instances of resource partitioning by the flies are not as absolute and
involve substrate chemistry, the yeast community and fly behaviour.
The relationship between cactophilic Drosophila and the cactophilic yeast community is a mutualism. However, the benefits provided by yeast to a fly or vice
versa are general enough that, in most cases, more than one species of yeast or fly
the distribution of cactophilic ye ast
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
X
X
18
19
20
21
22
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
is capable of supplying some benefit. Thus, the mutualism is diffuse (not speciesspecific). A consequence of the diffuse nature of the mutualism is that we should
not expect many one-to-one correspondences between the distribution of a species of cactophilic Drosophila and the distribution of particular cactophilic yeast.
Fly adults and larvae prefer yeast to bacteria as food (Vacek et€al., 1985). There
are numerous benefits to Drosophila from the presence of yeast. Some cactus tissue
does not provide a complete diet for the Drosophila that breed in it (Starmer, 1982).
This is usually because the cactus tissue is deficient in nitrogen resources. Yeast are
protein-rich and complete the fly’s diet. Some yeast reduce the toxicity of the host
tissue for the fly by metabolising toxins. Experiments that demonstrate a ‘biculture
effect’ have demonstrated that, except for the metabolism of specific toxins by specific yeast, the benefits supplied by yeast can usually be supplied by any of several
yeast species. A ‘biculture effect’ is an increase in some fitness component (larval
or pupal viability, reduction in development time, increase in size at eclosion) for
flies reared with two yeast species compared with the midpoint performance of
the flies on the relevant monocultures (Starmer and Aberdeen, 1990). The reason
for the effect is not known but is probably the result of amino acid, lipid or vitamin
complementarity. Ganter (2006) reviews a number of cactophilic Drosophila–yeast
157
158
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
interactions ranging from conversion of larval nitrogenous waste to protein, adult
and larval feeding preferences for particular yeast species, yeast production of
volatile compounds that cactophilic Drosophila can absorb through their respiratory system and use as food, reduction in sunlight-induced fly mortality when yeast
are part of the fly’s diet, yeast as nuptial gifts that enhance both a male’s chance of
mating and the female’s fecundity, and yeast lipids as possible precursors of cuticular lipids important in species recognition and mating success.
Several types of benefits supplied to yeast by cactophilic Drosophila have been
identified so far. One benefit is the stabilisation of cactophilic yeast community
dynamics. Most individual rot pockets contain between two and three yeast species. Starmer and Fogleman (1986) found that the addition of the appropriate
Drosophila larvae changed the dynamics of pairwise interactions among yeast
species and that the effect on the entire community was to stabilise it, thus preventing competitive exclusion through pairwise competition. There is some indication that animal dispersal increases the rate of outcrossing in Saccharomyces
cerevisiae (Reuter et€al., 2007) but this effect has not been demonstrated for a cactophilic yeast nor has outcrossing been shown to be universally beneficial to yeast
as there are many asexual lineages. Saccharomyces paradoxus, a close relative of S.
cerevisiae, apparently undergoes sex only once in 1000 generations and only 1% of
sexually reproductive events are outcrossed (Tsai et€a l., 2008). Of course, sex might
have benefits other than outcrossing as there is evidence that yeast spores survive
longer in a Drosophila gut than do vegetative cells (Reuter et€ al., 2007; Coluccio
et€al., 2008). Increased survival in the gut is only a benefit if yeast are vectored by
the flies. A dispersal benefit for yeast that undergo sex goes to the heart of the reason for cactophilic yeast endemism. Cactus rots are temporary and dispersal is a
regular, unavoidable occurrence for any cactophilic yeast.
Drosophila are vital to cactophilic yeast dispersal. Fogleman and Foster (1989)
found that they could induce rots in a columnar cactus, Stenocereus gummosus,
through freeze damage. Bacterial colonisation started almost immediately after the
damage occurred but yeast colonisation was delayed by two days. If they covered
the newly damaged tissue with a mesh that excluded adult Drosophila, the bacterial
community developed as though no mesh was present but there was an additional
delay of two days in the arrival of yeast. Drosophila and larger insects were excluded
by the mesh but smaller insects and mites were not. The authors concluded that
Drosophila are normally the first insects to arrive and the first to deposit yeast in the
rot but that insects are not important in bacterial colonisation, although bacterial
fermentation is probably important in attracting Drosophila to the new rot.
Geographic (narrow) endemism is promoted by factors that limit dispersal.
There are at least three consequences of vectoring by Drosophila that promote
endemism in cactophilic yeast by limiting dispersal. The first is that the ambit of
an adult fly is much smaller than the distance a desiccation-resistant spore might
the distribution of cactophilic ye ast
Table 8.8 The overlap between the yeast found in slime fluxes and rot pockets with those
found in the guts of Drosophila that breed in those substrates in Tucson, AZ (Ganter et€al.,
1986; Ganter, 1988). The proportion of strains shared with flies is the proportion of strains
from a particular host plant that were members of species also found in the fly species that
breed there. Similarly, the proportion of strains shared with a host plant is the proportion of
strains isolated from the fly that are members of species also found in the fly’s host plant.
Host plant1
Number of
strains
Shared
with flies
Cottonwood
20
0.65
D. b. and A. l.
23
0.53
Mesquite
92
0.95
D. carbonaria
46
0.50
Opuntia
148
0.76
D. l. and D. h.
34
0.74
Saguaro
36
0.92
D. n. and D. m.
109
0.89
Senita
18
0.61
D. pachea
12
1.00
Agria
68
0.99
D. mojavensis
44
0.98
Flies2
Number of
strains
Shared with
host plant
╇Cottonwood:€Populus fremontii; Mesquite:€Prosopis sp.; Opuntia:€O. phaeacantha and O. ficusindica; Saguaro:€Carnegiea gigantea; Senita:€Lophocereus schottii; Agria:€Stenocereus gummosus.
2
╇A . l.:€Aulacigaster leucopeza; D. b.:€Drosophila brooksae; D. h.:€Drosophila hamatophila;
D. l.: Drosophila longicornis; D. m.:€Drosophila mettleri; D. n.:€Drosophila nigrospiracula.
1
be carried by wind. The second consequence comes from the endemism shown
by the Drosophila. Cactophilic flies can have smaller ranges than the cacti they
inhabit when the cactus type is widespread, such as Opuntia. The flies that breed
in Opuntia in Texas are not the same flies that breed in Opuntia in Arizona. The
third consequence is an outcome of the fly’s behaviour. If the fly visits only a subset of potential yeast habitats, fly behaviour reduces the size of the yeast’s realised
niche compared to its fundamental niche.
Two data sets document the importance of cactophilic Drosophila to the distribution of cactophilic yeast (Ganter et€al., 1986; Ganter, 1988). The first is a set
of yeast collected from cactus rots and slime fluxes in the vicinity of Tucson, AZ
(slime fluxes from several species of trees, Opuntia and saguaro cactus) and in
Baja California, Mexico (agria and senita cactus). Each rot or flux was the breeding
site of at least one Drosophila species (with the addition of a cosmopolitan slime
flux fly, Aulacigaster leucopeza, in Cottonwood fluxes) and yeast were collected
from flies captured at the flux or rot by allowing the fly to deposit yeast on Petri
plates. Table 8.8 gives the overlap between the yeast deposited by the flies and the
yeast found in the flies’ breeding substrate. The overlap for the flies increases as
one moves from (relatively) mesic habitat (the slime fluxes, 0.53 and 0.50 overlap)
to the most xeric habitats (1.00 and 0.98 overlap). In cactus habitats, flies do not
tend to harbour yeast other than those in their breeding sites.
159
160
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Table 8.9 The average correlation between the yeast found in flies breeding in saguaro
(a)€or agria (b) cactus, the yeast in the cactus rots, and the yeast found in neighbouring
cacti near Tucson, AZ (saguaro) or Punta Prieta, Baja Mexico, Mexico (agria) (Ganter,
1988). Kruskal–Wallis analysis was used to compare the average similarity among groups
(ranks of the correlation coefficients calculated from the transformed proportional
yeast species composition of pairs of rots, pairs of flies or a rot and a fly). n:€the number
of comparisons. H (corrected for ties) = 95.0 (saguaro fly analysis) or = 179.5 (agria fly
analysis) and probability of a greater H < 0.0001 for either analysis.
(a) Saguaro flies
Source1
n
Mean correlation
Post-hoc test group
Fly€– Host Rot
16
0.88
A
Saguaro rot€– Saguaro-rot
91
0.66
B
Fly€– Fly
120
0.58
B
Fly€– Saguaro
208
0.51
BC
Opuntia€– Opuntia
36
0.49
BC
Saguaro€– Opuntia
126
0.46
C
Fly€– Opuntia
144
0.24
D
(b) Agria flies
Source1
D. mojavensis€– same rot
n
Mean correlation
Post-hoc test group
19
0.56
A
D. mojavensis€– D. mojavensis
171
0.53
AB
Agria€– Agria
210
0.40
BC
D. mojavensis€– Agria
380
0.39
BC
D. mojavensis€– Senita
132
0.25
CDE
Agria€– Senita
55
0.19
DE
Senita€– Senita
21
0.14
E
Fly:€either Drosophila nigrospiracula or D. mettleri; Opuntia:O. phaeacantha; Saguaro:€Carnegiea
gigantea; Senita:€Lophocereus schottii; Agria:€Stenocereus gummosus.
1╇
This effect is tested more explicitly in a second data set of yeast from cactus rots
and the flies found on the same rots. In this set, the yeast from individual rots and
individual adult flies are compared for two different species of Drosophila from
different host cacti and different locales in the Sonoran Desert (Table 8.9). Also
the distribution of cactophilic ye ast
included are yeast from cactus rots that were at the same locale but did not host
the fly. Rots in neighbouring cacti (at the same locale) that are not suitable for oviposition can still be places for the adult flies to feed and, so, yeast from neighbouring rots were included in the comparisons. For flies on saguaro, a cactus in the
Pachycereinae, and agria, a cactus in the Stenocereinae, the overall pattern is the
same. The yeast deposited by a fly (= the yeast dispersed by the fly) were most similar to the yeast isolated from the rot on which that fly had been captured and were
least similar to the yeast found on neighbouring rots in cacti that did not host their
larvae. Fly behaviour can act to reduce the likelihood of yeast being transmitted
between hosts, further limiting the dispersal of the yeast.
8.6╇ Discussion
To summarise, the data strongly favour narrow endemism over cosmopolitanism in cactophilic yeast. Cactophilic yeast species typically occupy only a subset of their fundamental niche and that subset is often delimited by geography.
The probable reason for their endemism is the diversity in cactus host chemistry
and the dispersal of the yeast by animal vectors rather than by wind or water. The
link between large population size and widespread dispersal is broken for these
microbes. Their reliance on animal vectors allows some rare yeast species to persist at population densities far less than those attained by the dominant yeast species in the same communities. As a consequence, they do not lack biogeography
as predicted by EiE (Finlay, 2002) and species richness is not unexpectedly low
(Fenchel and Finlay, 2004b). Cactophilic yeast have biogeographic patterns related
to their vector’s biogeography and species richness at least the equal of their vectors. There is simply no fit between their biology and the predictions of EiE.
Is this the case in other yeast habitats? To many, yeast refers to a single species:€Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The story of the taxonomy of this species is a very
long one (Vaughan-Martini and Martini, 1998, list 97 synonyms for it) and involves
hybridisation with congeners (Masneuf et€al., 1998; de Barros Lopes et€al., 2002;
Sipiczki, 2008; Belloch et€al., 2009). The genus has swelled and shrunk over time
and new genera have been carved from it (Kurtzman, 2003). The intense interest in
this species has led to the discovery of a group of phenotypically indistinguishable
species that form a cluster of sibling species:€the S. cerevisiae sensu stricto group.
All of the siblings show some degree of isolation (either reproductive or genetic) but
hybrids are so common that most strains examined have genes from more than one
species (Sipiczki, 2008; Muller and McCusker, 2009). Even given that human activity will disperse S. cerevisiae sensu stricto species widely, there is evidence of some
geographically based variation in S. cerevisiae (Naumova et€ al., 2003), although
most studies have found a stronger association between distribution and human
161
162
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
activity than geography (Ben-Ari et€a l., 2005; Aa et€a l., 2006). For other S. cerevisiae
sensu stricto species, there is evidence for geographically based variation (Naumov
et€ al., 1997b; Sweeney et€ al., 2004; Ayoub et€ al., 2006). Because human activity
affects dispersal so profoundly in the S. cerevisiae sensu stricto group and dispersal is a key factor in endemism, the population ecology of these yeast are unique
and it would be difficult to generalise from them to any other group. Carreto et€al.
(2008) found little geographic variation in an extensive study of wine yeast from
Portugal. I agree with their conclusion that human activity influences the pattern
of variation they found but I do not agree with their assertion that S. cerevisiae is
a good model system for natural populations. Little about the population biology
of S. cerevisiae seems natural in the sense of ‘undisturbed by the activity of man’.
Certainly, the finding of little geographically based genetic variation cannot be
generalised to yeast that are not domesticated.
The influence of human activity is not absent from the biogeography of cactophilic yeast. Clavispora opuntiae is the third most common cactophilic species (if one separates the Sporopachydermia complex into species; Table 8.2). It is
cosmopolitan in distribution but was not discussed in the section on endemism in
cactophilic yeast because of human influence. It is associated not with Drosophila
(although it has occasionally been isolated from flies) but with Lepidoptera
(Lachance, 1990; Rosa et€al., 1992). The larvae of some moths (e.g. species in the
genera Cactoblastis, Olycella, Laniifera and Sigelgaita) are able to penetrate the
cactus’ cuticle and feed on stem tissue. Cactoblastis larvae feed on Opuntia and
have been spread worldwide as biological control agents (Dodd, 1940; Pemberton,
1995; Perez-Sandic, 2001). They were taken from Argentina to Australia and the
Caribbean and have, either through inadvertent introduction or natural dispersal, spread throughout Florida in the USA (Soberón, 2002). Clavispora opuntiae
has accompanied the moth and patterns of genetic variation within the species
reflect this (Lachance et€ al., 2000). Yeast genotypes from Argentina, where the
moth originated, are now common in North American populations where the
moth has been introduced. Human influence is not absent from the biogeography
of other cactophilic yeast. There would be no Australian cactophilic yeast without
it. But the evidence that human influence affects Cl. opuntiae’s genetic variation in
the Americas, where cacti are native, makes its biogeography unique among cactophilic yeast. At this time, there is no evidence to suggest that genetic variation in
North or South American populations of other widespread cactophilic yeast species is influenced by human activity.
In addition to the cactophilic habitat, there are at least three other yeast habitats
where dispersal is primarily by animal vector:€wood, flowers and sap (slime) fluxes.
The potential diversity of yeast associated with beetles that bore in wood is high (Suh
et€al., 2005) and there is evidence that the beetles are the means of dispersal (Ganter,
2006). However, neither the biogeography of yeast from this habitat nor genetic
the distribution of cactophilic ye ast
variation within endemic yeast species has been well investigated so the level of
endemism in this community is not understood at present. The biogeographic patterns of the yeast communities of slime fluxes and flowers are better known.
Fluxes differ from cactus rots in the availability of sugars, the persistence of some
fluxes for multiple years, and the seasonality of the flow of sap. They are similar to
rots in that they are the breeding sites for various insects, including Drosophila.
A survey of teleomorphic ascomycetous yeast descriptions (Kurtzman and Fell,
1998; Morais et€a l., 2004; Kurtzman, 2005) reveals at least 30 sexual species known
only from slime fluxes or insects that breed there (32 taxa if varieties are counted
separately) and this impressive number does not include non-ascomycetous or
non-sporulating yeast. Two problems make assessment of the degree of geographic
endemism difficult to discern. One is that host plant is an important determinant of yeast community composition (Lachance and Starmer, 1982; Ganter et€al.,
1986) and geography and host plant type are confounded at a regional scale or larger. The second problem is the lack of large-scale sampling efforts in this habitat.
The size of the database is such that most comparisons are anecdotal at the global
scale. However, regional differences do appear. Two collections that sampled both
Quercus and Populus species, one in Arizona (Ganter et€al., 1986) and one in the
Great Lakes region (Lachance and Starmer, 1982) are comparable in that the host
plants came from the same genera. From Arizona, oaks yielded 50 isolates from 12
species of yeast. In the Great Lakes region, oaks yielded 85 yeast isolates from 24
species. The two studies had only three species in common and the isolates from
those species represented 36% and 22% of the isolates in Arizona and the Great
Lakes region, respectively. Although the samples are smaller, the lack of overlap
was present in Populus as well. The counts were 20 isolates and 12 species from
Arizona and 17 isolates in six species from the Great Lakes region. The overlap
was only one species (5% of the Arizona sample and 20% of the Great Lakes region
collection). At a larger scale, there are several species described from temperate
Asian slime fluxes that have never been found in temperate North America and
vice versa. The evidence points to geographic endemism in the slime-flux community, another yeast community vectored by animals.
Flowers represent a more widespread resource and a more complicated system
than sap fluxes. Yeast may benefit from nectar or other rewards for pollinators
(Brysch-Herzberg, 2004) and/or they may inhabit decaying, post-pollination flowers. Yeast that exploit flowers from the opening of the bud until the plant casts off
the flower are in contact with the many animals that visit flowers. Yeast that use
the cast-off flowers inhabit a more specialised resource and the animals involved
often include beetles and Drosophila (Lachance et€ al., 2003). The flower system
is only now receiving adequate study and the number of new species from the
Metschnikowia clade, all with similar phenotypes (Lachance et€ al., 2001a, 2003)
suggests that many new taxa will be described as more regions are sampled.
163
164
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Although some yeast from this system have wide geographic ranges (Ruivo et€al.,
2004), geographic endemism within this system already has some supporting evidence (Lachance et€al., 2001a, 2003, 2005; Rosa et€al., 2007; Imanishi et€al., 2008;
Wardlaw et€al., 2009). An interesting parallel to the cactophilic system is the high
degree of geographic differentiation found in a widely distributed asexual flower
yeast, Candida ipomoeae (Wardlaw et€al., 2009).
Although studies of global distribution of other yeast are rare, there is one species of black yeast, Aureobasidium pullulans, for which some geographic data exist.
Aureobasidium pullulans is a polytrophic yeast that occurs in a very wide set of habitats. A partial list includes deep seawater, mountaintops, Arctic and Antarctic sea
ice, hypersaline lakes, human infections, soil and many plant surfaces (fruits, trunks
and leaves). A study of genetic differentiation among strains from different habitats
clusters plant-associated A. pullulans strains in a single clade (Zalar et€ al., 2008).
Although this species has been found in association with insects that feed on plants
(Zacchi and Vaughan-Martini, 2003; Pagnocca et€al., 2008), most authors assume
that strains of plant-associated A. pullulans are passively dispersed by wind or water
droplet (splash). Loncaric et€al. (2009) found no geographic component to variation
among strains from fruit surfaces. Their study included mostly strains from Austria
but included strains from China, South Africa, Argentina, New Zealand and Italy.
Although the taxonomy and biogeography of this species is not fully understood, it
may be that the plant-associated clade is wind (or water) dispersed, global in distribution, and lacking population structure linked to geography.
EiE seems to be a rather standard case of ecological controversy. By that, I mean
that it is an idea that is applicable to some situations and not applicable to others.
Before the limits of the idea are recognised, controversy arises between those who
over-extend the concept’s reach and those who feel it is generally invalid because
it is invalid in their system of expertise. What is different here is that the ecological
controversy involves microbes and that means microbiologists are interested.
Microbiology has been accused of lacking theory (Prosser et€ al., 2007) and yet
EiE is an example of an old, well-established theory in microbiology (Lachance,
2004; de Wit and Bouvier, 2006). The data presented here contradict EiE but do not
invalidate the theory, although the data do make clear that EiE is not a universal
theory of microbial distribution. The example of cactophilic yeast raises several
questions about EiE. Under what circumstances does it apply? Is knowledge of the
mode of dispersal sufficient to predict whether or not EiE applies?
These questions give dispersal an importance it has lacked in microbial ecology and in yeast ecology in particular. If one relies on Baas Becking’s formulation,
‘Everything is everywhere, but the environment selects’ (italics in the original; de Wit
and Bouvier, 2006) then there is a risk that microbial ecology will be reduced to
substrate–microbe interactions. The lack of geographic barriers, essential to EiE,
means that a niche will not go unfulfilled in any region, indeed, it will be filled by
the distribution of cactophilic ye ast
the same species in all regions. The focus on selection by the environment has certainly been taken to heart by yeast biologists (Lachance, 2004; Ganter, 2006). The
roles of geography and dispersal mechanism have historically been either ignored
or assumed to be only weak influences in yeast ecology. One example of the consequences of the failure to consider something other than substrate is found in an
investigation into the source of contaminants in cheese (Westall and Filtenborg,
1998). The search never identified the source of contamination but was confined
to substrates in the factory and never examined sources outside of the factory but
within the ambit of a fly.
There is another question pertaining to the cactophilic system that remains to
be asked. Why are cactophilic yeast dispersed by animals instead of wind, which
seems adequate for the bacteria found in the system? There is no direct answer to
this question in the data presented here. The proximal cause is most probably history in that yeast have been introduced to the cactophilic system by insects and,
so, were already animal-dispersed. Starmer et€al. (2003) found evidence for multiple invasions of the cactophilic habitat by yeast from fruit rots and slime fluxes
(presumably older habitats). Yeast in both of these habitats are animal dispersed.
The origin of the association between yeast and Drosophila is not likely to be found
in study of the cactophilic yeast.
Acknowledgements
I would like to acknowledge the generosity of W.T. Starmer, who gave me access to
and permission to use his cactophilic yeast biogeography data set. I would also like
to thank my colleagues Carlos Rosa, for his help collecting and identifying yeast
from Brazil, Gianluigi Cardinali, for his help in identifying new species (with Livio
Antonielli) and in uncovering genetic variation, and Miguel de Barros Lopes, for
his help in assessing genetic variation in P. kluyveri. Many students contributed
to the data discussed above and I thank Vanessa Williams, Jamil Scott, Eduardo
Bustillo, Kevin Hillsman, Bo Li, Elvira Jaques, Bryan Quarles, Jenny Bellon,
Alessandro Bolano, Monia Giammaria, Keona Washington, Jennifer Pendola,
Ninette Lima and Monia Lattanzi for their contributions. Steve Benz helped with
the South American collections. Finally, I would like to thank those who reviewed
earlier versions of this article for their advice.
References
Aa, E., Townsend, J.P., Adams, R.I.,
Nielsen, K.M., Taylor, J.W. (2006).
Population structure and gene
evolution in Saccharomyces
cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Research 6,
702–715.
165
166
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Anderson, E.F. (2001). The Cactus Family.
Portland, OR: Timber Press.
Ayoub, M.-J., Legras, J.-L., Saliba, R.,
Gaillardin, C. (2006). Application
of multi locus sequence typing to
the analysis of the biodiversity of
indigenous Saccharomyces cerevisiae
wine yeasts from Lebanon. Journal of
Applied Microbiology 100, 699–711.
Baumberger, J.P. (1917). The food of
Drosophila melanogaster Meigen.
Proceedings of the National Academy of
Science USA 3, 122–126.
Baumberger, J.P. (1919). A nutritional study
of insects, with special reference to
microorganisms and their substrata.
Journal of Experimental Zoology 28,
1–81.
Begon, M. (1981). Yeasts and Drosophila.
In Ashburner, M., Carson, H.L.,
Thompson, J. (eds.), The Genetics and
Biology of Drosophila, 345–384. New
York, NY:€Academic Press.
Belloch, C., Pérez-Torrado, R., González,
S.S. et€al. (2009). Chimeric genomes
of natural hybrids of Saccharomyces
cerevisiae and Saccharomyces
kudriavzevii. Applied and
Environmental Microbiology 75,
2534–2544.
Ben-Ari, G., Zenvirth, D., Sherman, A.
et€al. (2005). Application of SNPs for
assessing biodiversity and phylogeny
among yeast strains. Heredity 95,
493–501.
Bloom, S.A. (1981). Similarity indices in
community studies:€potential pitfalls.
Marine Ecology Progress Series 5,
125–128.
Brysch-Herzberg, M. (2004). Ecology of
yeasts in plant–bumblebee mutualism
in Central Europe. FEMS Microbiology
Ecology 50, 87–100.
Cairney, J. (2005). Basidiomycete mycelia
in forest soils:€dimensions, dynamics
and roles in nutrient distribution.
Mycological Research 109, 7–20.
Carreto, L., Eiriz, E., Gomes, A. et€al.
(2008). Comparative genomics of wild
type yeast strains unveils important
genome diversity. BMC Genomics 9,
524.
Coluccio, A.E., Rodriguez, R.K., Kernan,
M.J., Neiman, A.M. (2008). The yeast
spore wall enables spores to survive
passage through the digestive
tract of Drosophila. PLoS ONE 3,
e2873–e2879.
Crampin, H., Finley, K., Gerami-Nejad, M.
et€al. (2005). Candida albicans hyphae
have a Spitzenkörper that is distinct
from the polarisome found in yeast
and pseudohyphae. Journal of Cell
Science 118, 2935–2947.
de Barros Lopes, M., Bellon, J.R., Shirley,
N.J., Ganter, P.F. (2002). Evidence for
multiple interspecific hybridization in
Saccharomyces sensu stricto species.
FEMS Yeast Research 1, 323–331.
de Hoog, G.S., Smith, M.T., Guého,
E. (1986). A revision of the genus
Geotrichum and its telomorphs.
Studies in Mycology 29, 1–131.
de Wit, R., Bouvier, T. (2006). ‘Everything
is everywhere, but the environment
selects’; what did Baas Becking and
Beijerinck really say? Environmental
Microbiology 8, 755–758.
Dodd, A.P., Published under the authority
of the Commonwealth Prickly Pear
Board (Australia) (1940). The Biological
Campaign Against the Prickly Pear.
Brisbane:€A.H. Tucker, Government
Printer.
Fellows, D.P., Heed, W.B. (1972). Factors
affecting host plant selection in
desert-adapted cactiphilic Drosophila.
Ecology 53, 850–858.
Fenchel, T., Finlay, B.J. (2004a). Response
to Lachance. BioScience 54, 884–885.
the distribution of cactophilic ye ast
Fenchel, T., Finlay, B.J. (2004b). The
ubiquity of small species:€patterns of
local and global diversity. BioScience
54, 777–784.
Ferguson, B.A., Dreisbach, T.A., Parks,
C.G., Filip, G.M., Schmitt, C.L.
(2003). Coarse-scale population
structure of pathogenic Armillaria
species in a mixed-conifer forest
in the Blue Mountains of northeast
Oregon. Canadian Journal of Forest
Management 33, 612–623.
Finlay, B.J. (2002). Global dispersal of freeliving microbial eukaryote species.
Science 296, 1061–1063.
Finlay, B.J., Clarke, K.J. (1999). Ubiquitous
dispersal of microbial species. Nature
400, 828.
Finlay, B.J., Fenchel, T. (2002). Response to
A. Coleman. Science 297, 337.
Fogleman, J.C. (1982). The role of
volatiles in the ecology of cactophilic
Drosophila. In Barker, J.S.F., Starmer,
W.T. (eds.), Ecological Genetics and
Evolution:€the Cactus–Yeast–Drosophila
Model System, pp. 191–208. Sydney:
Academic Press Inc.
Fogleman, J.C., Abril, R. (1990). Ecological
and evolutionary importance of host
plant chemistry. In Barker, J.S.F.,
MacIntyre, R.J., Starmer, W.T. (eds.),
Ecological and Evolutionary Genetics
of Drosophila, 121–143. New York, NY:
Plenum Press.
Fogleman, J.C., Foster, J.L. (1989).
Microbial colonization of injured
cactus tissue (Stenocereus
gummosus) and its relationship
to the ecology of cactophilic
Drosophila mojavensis. Applied and
Environmental Microbiology 55,
100–105.
Ganter, P.F. (1988). The vectoring of
cactophilic yeasts by Drosophila.
Oecologia 75, 400–404.
Ganter, P.F. (2006). Yeast and invertebrate
associations. In Rosa, C.A., Gábor, P.
(eds.), Biodiversity and Ecophysiology
of Yeasts, pp. 303–370. Berlin:€SpringerVerlag.
Ganter, P.F., de Barros Lopes, M. (2000).
The use of anonymous DNA markers
in assessing global relatedness in the
yeast species Pichia kluyveri Bedford
and Kudrjavzev. Canadian Journal of
Microbiology 26, 967–980.
Ganter, P.F., Quarles, B. (1997). Analysis
of population structure of cactophilic
yeast from the genus Pichia:€Pichia
cactophila and P. norvegensis.
Canadian Journal of Microbiology 43,
35–44.
Ganter, P.F., Starmer, W.T., Lachance,
M. -A., Phaff, H.J. (1986). Yeast
communities from host plants and
associated Drosophila in southern
Arizona:€new isolations and analysis
of the relative importance of hosts and
vectors on community composition.
Oecologia 70, 386–392.
Ganter, P.F., Cardinali, G., Giammaria, M.,
Quarles, B. (2004). Correlations among
measures of phenotypic and genetic
variation within an oligotrophic
asexual yeast, Candida sonorensis,
collected from Opuntia. FEMS Yeast
Research 4, 527–540.
Ganter, P.F., Cardinali, G., Boundy-Mills,
K. (2010). Pichia insulana sp. nov.,
a novel cactophilic yeast from the
Caribbean. International Journal
of Systematic and Evolutionary
Microbiology 60, 1001–1007.
Gibson, A.C. (1982). Phylogenetic
relationships of Pachycereeae. In
Barker, J.S.F., Starmer, W.T. (eds.),
Ecological Genetics and Evolution:€the
Cactus–Yeast–Drosophila Model
System, pp. 3–16. Sydney: Academic
Press.
167
168
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Gilbert, D.G. (1980). Dispersal of yeasts
and bacteria by Drosophila in a
temperate forest. Oecologia 46,
135–137.
Groenewald, M., Daniel, H.-M.,
Robert,€V., Poot, G.A., Smith, M.T.
(2008). Polyphasic re-examination of
Debaryomyces hansenii strains and
reinstatement of D. hansenii, D.€fabryi
and D. subglobosus. Persoonia 21,
17–27.
Heed, W.B. (1977a). Ecology and genetics
of Sonoran Desert Drosophila.
In Brussard, P.F. (ed.), Ecological
Genetics:€the Interface, pp. 109–126.
New York, NY:€Springer-Verlag.
Heed, W.B. (1977b). A new cactus-feeding
but soil-breeding species of Drosophila
(Diptera:€Drosophilidae). Proceedings
of the Entomological Society of
Washington 79, 649–654.
Heed, W.B. (1982). The origin of Drosophila
in the Sonoran Desert. In Barker, J.S.F.,
Starmer, W.T. (eds.), Ecological Genetics
and Evolution:€the Cactus–Yeast–
Drosophila Model System, pp. 65–80.
Sydney: Academic Press
Heed, W.B. (1989). Origin of Drosophila of
the Sonoran Desert revisited. In search
for a founder event and the description
of a new species in the eremophila
complex. In Giddings, L.V., Kaneshiro,
K.Y., Anderson, W.W. (eds.), Genetics,
Speciation and the Founder Principle,
pp. 253–278. New York, NY:€Oxford
University Press.
Heed, W.B., Starmer, W.T., Miranda, M.,
Miller, M.W., Phaff, H.J. (1976). An
analysis of the yeast flora associated
with cactiphilic Drosophila and their
host plants in the Sonoran Desert and
its relation to temperate and tropical
associations. Ecology 57, 151–160.
Hibbett, D.S. (2004). Trends in
morphological evolution in
homobasidiomycetes inferred using
maximum likelihood:€a comparison
of binary and multistate approaches.
Systematic Biology 53, 889–903.
Holzschu, D.L., Phaff, H.J. (1982).
Taxonomy and evolution of some
ascomycetous cactophilic yeasts. In
Barker, J.S.F., Starmer, W.T. (eds.),
Ecological Genetics and Evolution:€the
Cactus–Yeast–Drosophila Model
System, pp. 127–141. Sydney: Academic
Press
Holzschu, D.L., Phaff, H.J., Tredick,€J.,
Hedgecock, D. (1983). Pichia
pseudocactophila, a new species of
yeast occurring in necrotic tissue of
columnar cacti in the North American
Sonoran desert. Canadian Journal of
Microbiology 29, 1314–1322.
Holzschu, D.L., Phaff, H.J., Tredick, J.,
Hedgecock, D. (1985). Resolution
of the varietal relationship within
the species Pichia opuntiae and
establishment of a new species,
Pichia thermotolerans comb. nov.
International Journal of Systematic
Bacteriology 35, 457–461.
Imanishi, I., Jindamorakot, S., Mikata, K.
et€al. (2008). Two new ascomycetous
anamorphic yeast species related to
Candida friedrichii€– Candida jaroonii
sp. nov., and Candida songkhlaensis sp.
nov.€– isolated in Thailand. Antonie van
Leeuwenhoek 94, 267–276.
Jacques, N., Mallet, S., Casaregola, S.
(2009). Delimitation of the species
of the Debaryomyces hansenii
complex by intron sequence analysis.
International Journal of Systematic
and Evolutionary Microbiology 59,
1242–1251.
James, T.Y., Kauff, F., Schoch, C.L. et€al.
(2006). Reconstructing the early
evolution of Fungi using a six-gene
phylogeny. Nature 443, 818–822.
the distribution of cactophilic ye ast
Kircher, H. (1982). Chemical composition
of cacti and its relationship to Sonoran
desert Drosophila. In Barker J.S.F.,
Starmer, W.T. (eds.), Ecological Genetics
and Evolution:€the Cactus–Yeast–
Drosophila Model System, pp. 143–158.
Sydney: Academic Press.
Kurtzman, C.P. (1998). Pichia E.C. Hansen
emend. Kurtzman. In Kurtzman,
C.P., Fell, J.W. (eds.), The Yeasts,
A Taxonomic Study, pp. 273–352.
Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Kurtzman, C.P. (2003). Phylogenetic
circumscription of Saccharomyces,
Kluyveromyces and other members
of the Saccharomycetaceae, and
the proposal of the new genera
Lachancea, Nakaseomyces, Naumovia,
Vanderwaltozyma and Zygotorulaspora.
FEMS€Yeast Research 4, 233–245.
Kurtzman, C.P. (2005). Description of
Komagataella phaffii sp. nov. and
the transfer of Pichia pseudopastoris
to the methylotrophic yeast genus
Komagataella. International Journal
of Systematic and Evolutionary
Microbiology 55, 973–976.
Kurtzman, C.P., Fell, J.W. (1998). The
Yeasts, A Taxonomic Study. 4th Edition.
Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Kurtzman, C.P., Robnett, C.J. (1995).
Molecular relationships among hyphal
ascomycetous yeasts and yeastlike
taxa. Canadian Journal of Botany 73,
S824–S830.
Kurtzman, C.P., Robnett, C. J. (2010).
Systematics of methanol assimilating
yeasts and€neighboring taxa from
multigene sequence analysis and the
proposal of Peterozyma gen.nov., a new
memberof the Saccharomycetales.
FEMS Yeast Research 10, 353–361.
Kurtzman, C.P., Robnett, C.J., BasehoarPowers, E. (2008). Phylogenetic
relationships among species of Pichia,
Issatchenkia and Williopsis determined
from multigene sequence analysis,
and the proposal of Barnettozyma
gen. nov., Lindnera gen. nov. and
Wickerhamomyces gen. nov. FEMS
Yeast Research 8, 939–954.
Lachance, M.-A. (1990). Ribosomal DNA
spacer variation in the cactophilic
yeast Clavispora opuntiae. Molecular
Biology and Evolution 7, 178–193.
Lachance, M.-A. (2004). Here and there or
everywhere? BioScience 54, 884.
Lachance, M.-A., Bowles, J.M., Kwon,
S. et€al. (2001a). Metschnikowia
lochheadii and Metschnikowia
drosophilae, two new yeast species
isolated from insects associated
with flowers. Canadian Journal of
Microbiology 47, 103–109.
Lachance, M.-A., Bowles, J.M.,
Starmer,€W.T. (2003). Metschnikowia
santaceciliae, Candida hawaiiana,
and Candida kipukae, three new yeast
species associated with insects of
tropical morning glory. FEMS Yeast
Research 3, 97–103.
Lachance, M.-A., Ewing, C.P., Bowles, J.M.,
Starmer, W.T. (2005). Metschnikowia
hamakuensis sp. nov., Metschnikowia
kamakouana sp. nov. and Metschnikowia
mauinuiana sp. nov., three endemic
yeasts from Hawaiian nitidulid beetles.
International Journal of Systematic and
Evolutionary Microbiology 55, 1369–1377.
Lachance, M.-A., Gilbert, D.G., Starmer,
W.T. (1995). Yeast communities
associated with Drosophila species
and related flies in an eastern oak-pine
forest:€a comparison with western
communities. Journal of Industrial
Microbiology 14, 484–494.
Lachance, M.-A., Kaden, J.E., Phaff, H.J.,
Starmer, W.T. (2001b). Phylogenetic
structure of the Sporopachydermia
cereana species complex. International
169
170
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary
Microbiology 51, 237–247.
Lachance, M.-A., Starmer, W.T. (1982).
Evolutionary significance of
physiological relationships among
yeast communities associated with
trees. Canadian Journal of Botany 60,
285–293.
Lachance, M.-A., Starmer, W.T. (2008).
Kurtzmaniella gen. nov. and
description of the heterothallic,
haplontic yeast species Kurtzmaniella
cleridarum sp. nov., the teleomorph
of Candida cleridarum. International
Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary
Microbiology 58, 520–524.
Lachance, M.-A., Nair, P., Lo, P. (1994).
Mating in the heterothallic haploid
yeast Clavispora opuntiae, with special
reference to mating type imbalances in
local populations. Yeast 10, 895–906.
Lachance, M.-A., Starmer, W.T., Bowles,
J.M., Phaff, H.J., Rosa, C.A. (2000).
Ribosomal DNA, species structure,
and biogeography of the cactophilic
yeast Clavispora opuntiae. Canadian
Journal of Microbiology 46, 195–210.
Leask, B.G.S., Yarrow, D. (1976). Pichia
norvegensis sp. nov. Sabouraudia 14,
61–63.
Loncaric, I., Oberlerchner, J.T.,
Heissenberger, B., Moosbeckhofer,€R.
(2009). Phenotypic and genotypic
diversity among strains of
Aureobasidium pullulans in
comparison with related species.
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 95, 165–178.
Lutzoni, F., Kauff, F., Cox, C.J. et€al.
(2004). Assembling the fungal tree
of life:€progress, classification,
and evolution of subcellular traits.
American Journal of Botany 91,
1446–1480.
Magliani, W., Conti, S., Gerloni, M.,
Bertolotti, D., Poloneli, L. (1997). Yeast
killer systems. Clinical Microbiology
Reviews 10, 369–400.
Marcet-Houben, M., Gabaldón, T. (2009).
The tree versus the forest:€the fungal
tree of life and the topological diversity
within the yeast phylome. PLoS ONE 4,
e4357–e4364.
Masneuf, I., Hansen, J., Groth, C., Piskur,
P., Dubourdieu, D. (1998). New hybrids
between Saccharomyces sensu stricto
yeast species found among wine and
cider production strains. Applied
and Environmental Microbiology 64,
3887–3892.
Morais, P.B., Rosa, C.A., Hagler, A.N.,
Mendonça-Hagler, L.C. (1995).
Yeast communities as descriptors of
habitat use by the Drosophila fasciola
subgroup (repleta group) in Atlantic
rain forests. Oecologia 104, 45–51.
Morais, P.B., Teixeira, L.C.R.S., Bowles,
J.M., Lachance, M.-A., Rosa, C.A.
(2004). Ogataea falcaomoraisii sp.
nov., a sporogenous methylotrophic
yeast from tree exudates. FEMS Yeast
Research 5, 81–85.
Muller, L.A.H., McCusker, J.H. (2009).
A multispecies-based taxonomic
microarray reveals interspecies
hybridization and introgression in
Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast
Research 9, 143–152.
Murray, N.D. (1982). Ecology and evolution
of the Opuntia–Cactoblastis ecosystem
in Australia. In Barker, J.S.F., Starmer,
W.T. (eds.), Ecological Genetics and
Evolution:€the Cactus–Yeast–Drosophila
Model System, pp. 17–30. Sydney:
Academic Press.
Naumov, G.I., Naumova, E.S., Kondrativea,
V.I. et€al. (1997a). Genetic and
molecular delineation of three sibling
species in the Hansenula polymorpha
complex. Systematic and Applied
Microbiology 20, 50–56.
the distribution of cactophilic ye ast
Naumov, G.I., Naumova, E.S., Sniegowski,
P.D. (1997b). Differentiation of
European and Far East Asian
populations of Saccharomyces
paradoxus by allozyme analysis.
International Journal of Systematic
Bacteriology 47, 341–344.
Naumova, E.S., Smith, M.T., Boekhout,
T., de Hoog, G.S., Naumov, G.I.
(2001). Molecular differentiation of
sibling species in the Galactomyces
geotrichum complex. Antonie van
Leeuwenhoek 80, 263–273.
Naumova, E.S., Korshunova, I.V.,
Jespersen, L., Naumov, G.I. (2003).
Molecular genetic identification of
Saccharomyces sensu stricto strains
from African sorghum beer. FEMS
Yeast Research 3, 177–184.
Nguyen, H.-V., Gaillardin, C., Neuvéglise,
C. (2009). Differentiation of
Debaryomyces hansenii and Candida
famata by rRNA gene intergenic spacer
fingerprinting and reassessment
of phylogenetic relationships
among D. hansenii, C. famata,
D.€fabryi, C. flareri (=D. subglobosus)
and D. prosopidis:€description of
D.€vietnamensis sp. nov. closely related
to D. nepalensis. FEMS Yeast Research
9, 641–662.
Pagnocca, F.C., Rodrigues, A., Nagamoto,
N.S., Bacci, M. (2008). Yeasts and
filamentous fungi carried by the
gynes of leaf-cutting ants. Antonie van
Leeuwenhoek 94, 517–526.
Pemberton, R.W. (1995). Cactoblastis
cactorum (Lepidoptera:€Pyralidae)
in the United States:€An immigrant
biological control agent or an
introduction of the nursery industry?
American Entomologist 41, 230–232.
Perez-Sandic, M. (2001). Addressing
the threat of Cactoblastis cactorum
(Lepidoptera:€Pyralidae) to Opuntia
in Mexico. Florida Entomologist 84,
499–502.
Phaff, H.J., Starmer, W.T. (1987). Yeasts
associated with plants, insects and
soil. In Rose, A.H., Harrison, S.J. (eds.),
The Yeasts, pp. 123–180. Orlando, FL:
Academic Press.
Phaff, H.J., Starmer, W.T., Tredick-Kline,
J. (1987a). Pichia kluyveri sensu lato.
A proposal for two new varieties and
a new anamorph. In de Hoog, G.S.,
Smith, M.T., Weijman, A.C.M. (eds.),
The Expanding Realm of Yeast-like
Fungi:€Proceedings of an International
Symposium on the Perspectives of
Taxonomy, Ecology and Phylogeny of
Yeasts and Yeast-like Fungi, pp. 403–414.
Amsterdam:€Elsevier Science.
Phaff, H.J., Starmer, W.T., Tredick-Kline,
J., Miranda, M., Aberdeen, V. (1987b).
Pichia barkeri, a new species of yeast
occurring in necrotic tissue of Opuntia
stricta. International Journal of
Systematic Bacteriology 37, 783–796.
Phaff, H.J., Starmer, W.T., Lachance, M.-A.,
Aberdeen, V., Tredick-Kline, J. (1992).
Pichia caribaea, a new species of yeast
occurring in necrotic tissue of cacti
in the Caribbean area. International
Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 42,
459–462.
Phaff, H.J., Blue, J., Hagler, A.N., Kurtzman,
C.P. (1997). Dipodascus starmeri sp.
nov., a new species of yeast occurring
in cactus necroses. International
Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 47,
307–312.
Phaff, H.J., Vaughan-Martini, A., Starmer,
W.T. (1998). Debaryomyces prosopidis
sp. nov., a yeast from exudates
of mesquite trees. International
Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 48,
1419–1424.
Pohl, C.H., Kock, J.L.F., van Wyk, P.W.J.,
Albertyn, A. (2006). Cryptococcus
171
172
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
anemochoreius sp. nov., a novel
anamorphic basidiomycetous yeast
isolated from the atmosphere in
central South Africa. International
Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary
Microbiology 56, 2703–2706.
Prosser, J.I., Bohannan, B.J.M., Curtis,
T.P. et€al. (2007). The role of ecological
theory in microbial ecology. Nature
Reviews Microbiology 5, 384–392.
Reuter, M., Bell, G., Greig, D. (2007).
Increased outbreeding in yeast in
response to dispersal by an insect
vector. Current Biology 17, R81–R83.
Rosa, C.A., Hagler, A.N., Mendonça-Hagler,
L.C. et€al. (1992). Clavispora opuntiae
and other yeasts associated with
the moth Sigelgaita sp. in the cactus
Pilosocereus arrabidae of Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
(Historical Archive) 62, 267–272.
Rosa, C.A., Morais, P.B., Santos, S.R. et€al.
(1995). Yeast communities associated
with different plant resources in sandy
coastal plains of southeastern Brazil.
Mycological Research 99, 1047–1054.
Rosa, C.A., Lachance, M.-A., Teixeira,
L.C.R.S., Pimenta, R.S., Morais, P.B.
(2007). Metschnikowia cerradonensis
sp. nov., a yeast species isolated from
ephemeral flowers and their nitidulid
beetles in Brazil. International Journal
of Systematic and Evolutionary
Microbiology 57, 161–165.
Ruivo, C.C.C., Lachance, M.-A., Bacci,€M.
et€al. (2004). Candida leandrae sp.
nov., an asexual ascomycetous yeast
species isolated from tropical plants.
International Journal of Systematic
and Evolutionary Microbiology 54,
2405–2408.
Ruiz, A., Heed, W.B. (1988). Hostplant specificity in the cactophilic
Drosophila mulleri species complex.
Journal of Animal Ecology 57, 237–249.
Sang, J.H. (1956). The quantitative
nutritional requirements of Drosophila
melanogaster. Journal of Experimental
Biology 33, 45–72.
Sang, J.H. (1978). The nutritional
requirements of Drosophila. In
Ashburner, M., Wright, T.R.F. (eds.),
The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila,
pp. 159–192. New York, NY: Academic
Press.
Sipiczki, M. (2008). Interspecies
hybridization and recombination in
Saccharomyces wine yeasts. FEMS
Yeast Research 8, 996–1007.
Soberón, J. (2002). The routes of invasion
of Cactoblastis cactorum. pdf of a
powerpoint presentation, Comisión
Nacional para el Conocimiento y uso
de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO), Puerto
Vallarta, Mexico.
Spatafora, J.W., Sung, G.H., Johnson, D.
et€al. (2006). A five-gene phylogeny
of Pezizomycotina. Mycologia 98,
1018–1028.
Starmer, W.T. (1982). Associations and
interactions among yeasts, Drosophila,
and their habitats. In Barker, J.S.F.,
Starmer, W.T. (eds.), Ecological Genetics
and Evolution:€The Cactus-YeastDrosophila Model System, 159–174.
Sydney: Academic Press.
Starmer, W.T., Aberdeen, V. (1990). The
nutritional importance of pure
and mixed cultures of yeasts in the
development of Drosophila mulleri
larvae in Opuntia tissues and its
relationship to host plant shifts. In
Barker, J.S.F., Starmer, W.T., MacIntyre,
R.J. (eds.), Ecological and Evolutionary
Genetics of Drosophila, 145–160. New
York, NY:€Plenum Press.
Starmer, W.T., Fogleman, J.C. (1986).
Coadaptation of Drosophila and yeasts
in their natural habitat. Journal of
Chemical Ecology 12, 1035–1053.
the distribution of cactophilic ye ast
Starmer, W.T., Phaff, H.J., Miranda,€M.,
Miller, M.W. (1978). Pichia
amethionina, a new heterothallic yeast
associated with the decaying stems of
cereoid cacti. International Journal of
Systematic Bacteriology 28, 433–441.
Starmer, W.T., Phaff, H.J., Miranda, M.,
Miller, M.W., Barker, J.S.F. (1979).
Pichia opuntiae, a new heterothallic
yeast found in decaying cladodes
of Opuntiae inermis and in necrotic
tissue of cereoid cacti. International
Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 29,
159–167.
Starmer, W.T., Kircher, H.W., Phaff, H.J.
(1980). Evolution and speciation of
host plant specific yeasts. Evolution 34,
137–146.
Starmer, W.T., Phaff, H.J., Tredick, J.,
Miranda, M., Aberdeen, V. (1984).
Pichia antillensis, a new species of
yeast associated with necrotic stems
of cactus in the Lesser Antilles.
International Journal of Systematic
Bacteriology 34, 350–354.
Starmer, W.T., Ganter, P.F., Phaff, H.J.
(1986). Quantum and continuous
evolution of the DNA base composition
in the yeast genus Pichia. Evolution 40,
1263–1274.
Starmer, W.T., Aberdeen, V., Lachance,
M.-A. (1988a). The yeast community
associated with decaying Opuntia
stricta (Haworth) in Florida with
regard to the moth Cactoblastis
cactorum (Berg). Florida Scientist 51,
7–11.
Starmer, W.T., Phaff, H.J., Bowles, J.M.,
Lachance, M.-A. (1988b). Yeasts
vectored by insects feeding on
decaying saguaro cactus. Southwestern
Naturalist 33, 362–363.
Starmer, W.T., Lachance, M.-A., Phaff, H.J.,
Heed, W.B. (1990). The biogeography of
yeasts associated with decaying cactus
tissue in North America, the Caribbean,
and Northern Venezuela. In Hecht,
M.K., Wallace, B., MacIntyre, R.J. (eds.),
Evolutionary Biology, pp.€253–296. New
York, NY: Plenum Press.
Starmer, W.T., Ganter, P.F., Aberdeen, V.
(1992). Geographic distribution and
genetics of killer phenotypes for the
yeast Pichia kluyveri across the United
States. Applied and Environmental
Microbiology 58, 990–997.
Starmer, W.T., Phaff, H.J., Ganter, P.F.,
Lachance, M.-A. (2001). Candida orba
sp. nov., a new cactus-specific yeast
species from Queensland, Australia.
International Journal of Systematic and
Evolutionary Microbiology 51, 699–705.
Starmer, W.T., Schmedicke, R.A.,
Lachance, M.-A. (2003). The origin of
the cactus-yeast community. FEMS
Yeast Research 3, 441–448.
Sudbery, P., Gow, N., Berman, J. (2004).
The distinct morphogenic states
of Candida albicans. Trends in
Microbiology 12, 317–324.
Suh, S.O., McHugh, J.V., Pollock, D.D.,
Blackwell, M. (2005). The beetle gut:€a
hyperdiverse source of novel yeasts.
Mycological Research 109, 261–265.
Sweeney, J.Y., Kuehne, H.A., Sniegowski,
P.D. (2004). Sympatric natural
Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S.
paradoxus populations have different
thermal growth profiles. FEMS Yeast
Research 4, 521–525.
Takashima, M., Sugita, T., Shinoda,
T., Nakase, T. (2003). Three new
combinations from the Cryptococcus
laurentii complex:€Cryptococcus
aureus, Cryptococcus carnescens and
Cryptococcus peneaus. International
Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary
Microbiology 53, 1187–1194.
Tsai, I.J., Bensasson, D., Burt, A.,
Koufopanou, V. (2008). Population
173
174
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
genomics of the wild yeast
Saccharomyces paradoxus:€quantifying
the life cycle. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences USA 105,
4957–4962.
Vacek, D.C., East, P.D., Barker, J.S.F.,
Soliman, M.H. (1985). Feeding and
oviposition preferences of Drosophila
buzzatii for microbial species isolated
from its natural environment.
Biological Journal of the Linnean
Society 24, 175–187.
Vaughan-Martini, A., Martini, A. (1998).
Saccharomyces Meyen ex Reess. In
Kurtzman, C.P., Fell, J.W. (eds.), The
Yeasts, A Taxonomic Study, pp. 358–371.
Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Vaughan-Martini, A.E., Kurtzman, C.P.,
Meyer, S.A., O ‘ Neill, E.B. (2005).
Two new species in the Pichia
guilliermondii clade:€Pichia caribbica
sp. nov., the ascosporic state of
Candida fermentati, and Candida
carpophila comb. nov. FEMS Yeast
Research 5, 463–469.
Vegelius, J., Janson, S., Johansson, F.
(1986). Measures of similarity between
distributions. Quality and Quantity 20,
437–441.
von Arx, J.A. (1977). Notes on Dipodascus,
Endomyces, and Geotrichum with
the description of two new species.
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 43, 333–340.
Wardlaw, A.M., Berkers, T.E., Man, K.C.,
Lachance, M.-A. (2009). Population
structure of two beetle-associated
yeasts:€comparison of a New World
asexual and an endemic Nearctic sexual
species in the Metschnikowia clade.
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 96, 1–15.
Westall, S., Filtenborg, O. (1998). Spoilage
yeasts of decorated soft cheese
packed in modified atmosphere. Food
Microbiology 15, 243–249.
Yamada, Y., Higashi, T., Ando, S., Mikata,€K.
(1997). The phylogeny of strains of
species of the genus Pichia Hansen
(Saccharomycetacea) based on the
partial sequences of the 18S ribosomal
RNA:€t he proposals of Phaffomyces and
Starmera, the new genera. Bulletin of
the Faculty of Agriculture, Shizuoka
University 47, 23–35.
Yamada, Y., Kawasaki, H., Nagatsuka,€Y.,
Mikata, K., Seki-T. (1999). The
phylogeny of the cactophilic yeasts
based on the 18S ribosomal RNA
gene sequences:€The proposals of
Phaffomyces antillensis and Starmera
caribaea, new combinations.
Bioscience Biotechnology and
Biochemistry 63, 827–832.
Zacchi, L., Vaughan-Martini, A. (2003).
Distribution of three yeast and yeastlike species within a population of
soft scale insects (Saissetia oleae) as a
function of developmental age. Annals
of Microbiology 53, 43–46.
Zalar, P., Gostinčar, C., de Hoog, G.S. et€al.
(2008). Redefinition of Aureobasidium
pullulans and its varieties. Studies in
Mycology 61, 21–38.
Part IV
Pluricellular eukaryotes
9
Coalescent analyses reveal contrasting
patterns of intercontinental gene flow in
arctic-alpine and boreal-temperate fungi
József Geml
National Herbarium of the Netherlands, Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity
Naturalis, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
9.1╇ Introduction
Many microbial prokaryote and eukaryote morphospecies have been observed
to have essentially global distributions (Finlay, 2002). Based on this observation,
it has been suggested that populations are so large and dispersal is so effective in
these organisms that any tendencies toward geographic isolation and speciation
are swamped by gene flow and, hence, that microbes lack detectable biogeography
(Fenchel and Finlay, 2004). Where geographic patterning of genetic structure is seen
in microbes, the question arises as to whether it is due to selection by the habitat
or historical limitations on dispersal (Martiny et€al., 2006). Given the tremendous
uncharted diversity of fungi, their critical roles in ecosystems, their potential for
extensive dispersal by humans (e.g. with agricultural and forestry products), their
importance to public health (e.g. mycoses), their valued roles in diverse human
societies (e.g. in diverse foods), and the threats posed by rapidly changing climates,
it is imperative to determine to what degree fungi have biogeographies.
Biogeography of Microscopic Organisms: Is Everything Small Everywhere?, ed. Diego Fontaneto.
Published by Cambridge University Press. © The Systematics Association 2011.
178
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Fungi share some features with prokaryotic microbes:€ many species are unicellular and nearly all fungi disperse via single-celled mitotic and/or meiotic
spores. They also share many features with other eukaryotes, including discrete evolutionary lineages that are not interconnected by lateral gene transfer.
A number of recent molecular phylogenetic studies summarised in Taylor et€ al.
(2006) have demonstrated intercontinental genetic breaks in cosmopolitan fungal
morphospecies. Thus, the emerging pattern is that many fungi do have biogeog�
raphies. However, at present, our understanding of these patterns is very coarse.
Furthermore, although ecological attributes likely play a role in the dispersal capacities of fungal taxa, it is virtually unknown to what extent fungi inhabiting the
same biome share phylogeographic patterns and whether or not there is any general trend among them.
Comparative phylogeographic analyses, such as those detailed in this paper,
can contribute to broader studies of ecology and evolution in at least two principal ways:€ (1) phylogeography provides an evolutionary and geographic context
for the species comprising ecological communities, permitting determination of
historical and spatial influences on patterns of species richness (e.g. Ricklefs and
Schluter, 1993); and (2) an understanding of historical responses to changes in
the landscape and the identification of evolutionarily isolated areas can inform
conservation strategies (Moritz and Faith, 1998). In this paper, my focus is on
comparing population structures and long-distance gene flow in arctic and boreal fungi.
While phylogeography of arctic plants and animals have been extensively studied (e.g. Reiss et€ al., 1999; Tremblay and Schoen, 1999; Abbott and Comes, 2003;
Brunhoff et€ al., 2003; Fedorov et€ al., 2003; Flagstad and Røed, 2003; Wickström
et€a l., 2003; Alsos et€al., 2005, 2007; Dalén et€a l., 2005; Parmesan, 2006; Eidesen et€a l.,
2007; Schönswetter et€al., 2007; Marthinsen et€al., 2008), the systematics, ecology
and �phylogeographic studies of fungi in arctic regions remain scarce, despite their
critical roles in the functioning of these nutrient-poor ecosystems (Callaghan et€a l.,
2004; Printzen, 2008). Studying migration in high-latitude fungi, i.e. the degree
to which they are able to colonise newly exposed, suitable habitats (e.g. following
receding glaciers) and to exchange genes with populations inhabiting different geographic regions, is especially relevant for climate change studies. Climate warming
is expected to cause a northward shift in the distribution of many arctic species,
and the long-distance dispersal capability of individual species will greatly influence the composition of future arctic communities (Alsos et€a l., 2007).
I examined intraspecific genetic diversity, genetic structure and estimated
long-distance gene flow in selected arctic-alpine and boreal-temperate fungi with
circumpolar or disjunct distributions to attempt to answer the following questions:€(1) What is the extent of intercontinental gene flow in the selected species?
(2) Do species from a certain biome share similar migration patterns? (3) If some
c o n t r a s t i n g p at t e r n s o f i n t e r c o n t i n e n ta l g e n e f l o w i n f u n g i
differences exist among species and/or biomes, what may be the underlying ecological, historical and geographic reasons?
Species that are widely distributed in the northern hemisphere and represent
different taxonomical and ecological groups were chosen for the analyses:€ the
arctic-alpine lichens Flavocetraria cucullata (Bellardi) Kärnefelt and A. Thell,
Flavocetraria nivalis (L.) Kärnefelt and A. Thell and Dactylina arctica (Hook. f.)
Nyl., the arctic-alpine ectomycorrhizal agaric Cortinarius favrei D.M. Hend, the
arctic-alpine lichenised agaric Lichenomphalia umbellifera (L.) Redhead, Lutzoni,
Moncalvo and Vilgalys, the temperate-boreal ectomycorrhizal agarics Amanita
muscaria (L.) Hooker, Amanita pantherina (DC.) Krombh., and Lactarius deliciosus (L.) Gray, the boreal-temperate wood-rotting Grifola frondosa (Dicks.) Gray,
and the temperate lichen Trapeliopsis glaucolepidea (Nyl.) Gotth. Schneid.
Applying non-parametric permutation tests, migration estimates and genealogies generated using coalescent methods, I found a moderate to high amount of
intercontinental gene flow in arctic fungi and very little or no intercontinental gene
flow in boreal and temperate species, regardless of their systematic positions. To
my knowledge, these results provide the most complete characterisation of intraspecific genetic diversity in arctic fungi and suggest that many arctic species have
strong potential to adapt to the changing Arctic by tracking their ecological niche
and to maintain high genetic diversity through long-distance dispersal and gene
flow among distant populations.
9.2╇ Materials and methods
The DNA sequence data analysed in this paper were compiled from new data and
sequences available from GenBank. I concentrated my efforts on the internal
transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the nuclear ribosomal DNA repeat, because this
locus has been useful in earlier phylogeographic studies in a variety of fungi (e.g.
Shen et€ al., 2002; Oda et€ al., 2004; Palice and Printzen, 2004; Geml et€ al., 2008,
2010; Bergemann et€ al., 2009) and because it is the most frequently sequenced
fungal locus and, thus, it usually provides the greatest sample size and geographic coverage for any species. Because my main purpose was to estimate
transoceanic gene flow, only species with several sequences from both Eurasian
and North (or Central) American samples were included. The final data sets for
the individual species contained the following sequences (GenBank accession
numbers):€ Flavocetraria cucullata (FJ914765-FJ914812), Flavocetraria nivalis
(GU067685-GU067729), Dactylina arctica (GU981748-GU981760), Lichenomphalia
umbellifera (AY293955-AY293961, GU810926–810969), Cortinarius favrei
(DQ295071-DQ295085, AF182798, AF325575, GU234036, GU234040, GU234070,
GU234087, GU234096, GU234128, GU981746-GU981747), Amanita muscaria
179
180
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
(AB080777-AB080795, AB080980-AB080984, AB081294-AB081296, AB096048AB096052, EU071889, EU071893, EU071896-EU071936), Amanita pantherina
(AB080774-AB080776, AB080784-AB080786, AB080973-AB080978, AB096043AB096047, AB103329, EF493269, EU525997, EU909452, GQ401354), Grifola frondosa (AY049091-AY049141), Lactarius deliciosus (AF230892, AF249283-AF249284,
AY332557, DQ116886-DQ116904, EF685050-EF685059, EU423914-EU423923) and
Trapeliopsis glaucolepidea (AY600064-AY600082).
Multiple sequence alignments were made using Clustal W (Thompson et€ al.,
1997) and subsequently were corrected manually. Identical ITS sequences were
collapsed into haplotypes using SNAP Map (Aylor et€ al., 2006) after excluding
insertion or deletions (indels) and infinite-sites violations. The analyses presented
here assume an infinite sites model, under which a polymorphic site is caused
by exactly one mutation and there can be no more than two segregating bases.
Base substitutions were categorised as phylogenetically uninformative or informative, and as transitions or transversions. Site compatibility matrices were generated from each haplotype data set using SNAP Clade and Matrix (Markwordt
et€al., 2003; Bowden et€al., 2008) to examine compatibility/incompatibility among
all variable sites, with any resultant incompatible sites removed from the data
set. Genetic differentiation among geographic populations was analysed using
SNAP Map, Seqtomatrix and Permtest (Hudson et€a l., 1992) implemented in SNAP
Workbench (Price and Carbone, 2005). Permtest is a non-parametric permutation
method based on Monte Carlo simulations that estimates Hudson’s test statistics
(K ST, KS and K T) under the null hypothesis of no genetic differentiation. KST is equal
to 1 – KS/K T, where KS is a weighted mean of K1 and K2 (mean number of differences between sequences in subpopulations 1 and 2, respectively) and K T represents the mean number of differences between two sequences regardless of the
subpopulation to which they belong. The null hypothesis of no genetic differentiation is rejected (P < 0.05) when KS is small and KST is close to 1. For this test, specimens were assigned to geographic groups based on continents (North America or
Eurasia).
Two independent methods were used to determine whether there was any evidence of transoceanic migration between pairs of populations inhabiting different
continents. First, I used MDIV (Nielsen and Wakeley, 2001), implemented in SNAP
Workbench (Price and Carbone, 2005), employing both likelihood and Bayesian
methods using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) coalescent simulations to estimate the migration (M), population mean mutation rate (Theta), and divergence
time (T). Here, M equals 2 × the net effective population size (Ne) multiplied by m
(migration rate), while Theta is 4 × Ne multiplied by μ (mutation rate) (Watterson,
1975). Ages were measured in coalescent units of 2N, where N is the population
size. This approach assumes that all populations descended from one panmictic
population that may or may not have been followed by migration. For each data€set,
c o n t r a s t i n g p at t e r n s o f i n t e r c o n t i n e n ta l g e n e f l o w i n f u n g i
the data were simulated assuming an infinite sites model with uniform prior. I
used 2â•›000â•›000 steps in the chain for estimating the posterior probability distribution and an initial 500â•›000 steps to ensure that enough genealogies were simulated before approximating the posterior distribution. Second, if MDIV showed
evidence of migration, MIGRATE was used to estimate migration rates assuming
equilibrium migration rates (symmetrical or asymmetrical) in the history of the
populations (Beerli and Felsenstein, 2001). I applied the following specifications
for the MIGRATE maximum-likelihood analyses:€M* (migration rate m divided by
mutation rate μ) and Theta generated from the FST calculation, migration model
with variable Theta, and constant mutation rate. The numbers of immigrants per
generation (4Nem) were calculated by multiplying Theta of the receiving population with the population migration rate M*. Subsequently, I reconstructed the
genealogy with the highest root probability and the ages of mutations in the sample using coalescent simulations in Genetree v. 9.0 (Griffiths and Tavaré, 1994).
Ages were measured in coalescent units of 2N, where N is the population size.
9.3╇ Results
Sample size, number of haplotypes and polymorphic sites, and estimates of
Hudson’s test statistics (KST, KS and K T) on population subdivision for each species are shown in Table 9.1. For boreal-temperate species, non-parametric permutation tests always indicated strong geographic structure corresponding to
continents. The opposite was true for arctic species, where no or weak (marginally significant) genetic differentiations were found among North American and
Eurasian populations.
In the combined approach detailed above, I utilised the complementary
strengths of MDIV and MIGRATE to estimate the extent of transoceanic gene flow.
For example, MIGRATE was used to estimate the direction of migration, but could
not distinguish between shared ancestral polymorphism and recurrent gene flow;
while MDIV was used to determine if the diversity patterns in North American
and Eurasian populations were the result of retention of ancestral polymorphism
or recent gene flow. Although values for Theta were comparable among all species (data not shown), estimates for long-distance gene flow were widely different
in boreal-temperate vs. arctic-alpine species (Fig 9.1). In all boreal species, MDIV
showed evidence for no intercontinental gene flow (M = 0) and statistically significant, non-zero population divergence time (T, data not shown). On the other hand,
in all arctic species, MDIV estimated moderate to high gene flow between North
American and Eurasian populations and estimated no population divergence
(T not significantly different from 0). MIGRATE detected bidirectional gene flow in
most arctic population pairs. Based on these results, simulations in Genetree were
181
7
21
14
24
13
49
41
51
Dactylina arctica
Flavocetraria cucullata
Flavocetraria nivalis
Lichenomphalia umbellifera
16
8
15
13
22
46
41
58
Amanita pantherina
Grifola frondosa
Lactarius deliciosus
Trapeliopsis glaucolepidea
* After recoding indels and removing infinite-sites violations.
29
61
Amanita muscaria
Boreal/Temperate
14
29
Number of
haplotypes
Cortinarius favrei
Arctic/Alpine
Species
Sample
size
22
47
16
42
49
46
21
40
18
20
Polymorphic
sites*
0.252
0.694
0.829
0.461
0.520
–0.008
0.043
0.043
–0.075
0.032
KST
2.465
2.464
1.028
5.979
4.126
3.689
2.182
7.411
5.348
2.627
KS
3.297
8.056
6.045
11.104
8.598
3.658
2.281
7.744
4.974
2.714
KT
Eurasian vs. American populations
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.891
0.019
0.022
0.876
0.092
P
Table 9.1 Sample size, number of haplotypes and polymorphic sites, and genetic differentiation between Eurasian vs. American
populations according to Hudson’s test statistics (K ST, KS and K T). Significance was evaluated by performing 1000 permutations for each
species.
c o n t r a s t i n g p at t e r n s o f i n t e r c o n t i n e n ta l g e n e f l o w i n f u n g i
Fig 9.1 Posterior probability distributions of migration (M = 2Nem) estimated between
transoceanic population pairs of arctic/alpine and boreal/temperate species using
Markov chain Monte Carlo coalescent simulations in MDIV. For each data set, the data
were simulated assuming an infinite sites model, using 2â•›000â•›000 steps in the chain,
and an initial 500â•›000 steps to ensure that enough genealogies were simulated before
approximating the posterior distribution.
183
Haplotype
Frequency
N. America
Eurasia
Haplotype
Frequency
N. America
Eurasia
Fig 9.2 Examples of coalescent-based genealogies with the highest root probabilities
showing the distribution of mutations for the ITS region. The inferred genealogies are based
on 2â•›000â•›000 simulations of the coalescent. The time scale is in coalescent units of 2N, where
N is the population size. Mutations and bifurcations are time ordered from the top (past)
to the bottom (present). The letters and numbers below the trees designate the distinct
haplotypes, their observed frequencies in total and in the different geographic regions.
c o n t r a s t i n g p at t e r n s o f i n t e r c o n t i n e n ta l g e n e f l o w i n f u n g i
conducted assuming moderately high level of migration (M = 0.1) in arctic species,
and very low level of migration (M = 0.001) in boreal-temperate taxa. As expected,
the coalescent-based genealogies showed strong historical population divisions
in the boreal group, but not in the arctic taxa, and were informative with respect
to inferring the mutational history and variation between and within geographic
regions. Examples of coalescent-based genealogies are shown in Fig 9.2 for three
arctic-alpine and three boreal-temperate species.
9.4╇ Discussion
The main goal of this chapter was to estimate intercontinental migration between
populations of arctic-alpine and boreal-temperate fungi in the northern hemisphere with the purpose of gaining some insights in the possible mechanisms
that play roles in the dispersal capacities of fungi. Beside the possible theoretical
advancement in our knowledge regarding long-distance dispersal, the varying
capacities of fungi to migrate over vast areas have practical implications in shaping the composition of past, present and future communities during shifts in species distributions due to climatic changes.
Many boreal, temperate or tropical fungi show strong intercontinental, sometimes even intracontinental, phylogeographic patterns and limited dispersal,
and there is an increasing amount of geographic endemism being discovered
(e.g. Taylor et€al., 2006 and references therein; Geml et€al., 2008; Bergemann et€al.,
2009). In recent years, molecular tools have revealed several examples of distinct phylogeographic groups within complexes that were previously treated as
morphological species. The existence of multiple phylogenetic lineages within a
morphological species, mostly with non-overlapping geographic distributions, in
itself is a powerful argument against the ‘everything is everywhere’ theory that is
a commonly held view regarding the distribution of microbial taxa (Finlay, 2002).
For example, morphological species complexes of fungi from the northern hemisphere have generally been shown to include two major lineages, a Eurasian and
a North American (e.g. Shen et€al., 2002; Taylor et€al., 2006 and references therein;
Geml et€ al., 2008). Because in most studied fungi, the allopatric phylogenetic
clades inhabit similar environments in different continents, this implies a phylogenetic structure that has arisen as a result of the lack of intercontinental dispersal. All of the boreal-temperate species analysed here share this pattern and had
intraspecific phylogenetic groups corresponding to continents.
Arctic fungi seem very different from these examples, as patterns of genetic
diversity described above were not observed in any of the arctic-alpine species
discussed in this paper. Instead, clades inferred within each species contained
specimens from distant geographic regions, and geographic population pairs
185
186
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
exhibited moderate to high transoceanic gene flow. This suggests that, in response
to climatic fluctuations, these species have been able to migrate over large distances due to efficient long-distance dispersal capability. In addition, large and
diverse populations have served as sources for such migrants, as suggested by the
number of haplotypes (Table 9.1). The high observed genetic diversity in the Arctic
indicates long-term survival at northern high latitudes, while the estimated migration rates and the no or weak geographic population structure suggest continuing
long-distance gene flow between continents that has prevented pronounced genetic differentiation. Similar patterns of circumpolar genetic diversity have been
detected in some other arctic organisms, for example in highly mobile animals,
such as the arctic fox, Alopex lagopus (Dalén et€al., 2005) and the snowy owl, Bubo
scandiacus (Marthinsen et€al., 2008), as well as in the arctic-alpine lineage of the
bog blueberry Vaccinium uliginosum (Alsos et€al., 2005).
One cannot avoid posing the question:€ Why do arctic-alpine fungi differ in
�phylogeographic trends from more southern species? The most likely explanation
is that climatic changes during the Quaternary dramatically influenced the distribution of flora and fauna, particularly at higher latitudes. During glacial maxima,
plants, fungi and animals were restricted to unglaciated refugia, from which they
recolonised newly exposed areas in warmer interglacial periods (see Abbott and
Brochmann, 2003). Although climatic changes have caused some shifts in species distributions in most terrestrial habitats around the globe, changes have been
the greatest at high latitudes, and so were the geographic distances the species
had to cover to track their ecological niche and to colonise newly available habitats following glacial retreats. It is, therefore, very likely, that many arctic fungi,
particularly the keystone taxa with circumpolar distribution, have been selected
for mobility during the glacial cycles, as suggested for plants (Brochmann and
Brysting, 2008).
Although the mode of dispersal is not known for arctic fungi, it is likely that
wind dispersal is important, as expected for most fungi. Wind dispersal should be
particularly effective in the Arctic as a result of the open landscape, strong winds
and extensive snow and ice cover, as has also been shown for arctic plants (Alsos
et€al., 2007). In this regard, the sea ice may be of particular importance for intercontinental dispersal, as it provides a dry surface bridging the continents and
archipelagos. Obviously, this is an important difference to boreal-temperate species, which would need to cross greater distances of open water to reach another
continent. Although such transoceanic dispersals are often documented in fungi
in mid-latitudes in the southern hemisphere (Moyersoen et€ al., 2003; Moncalvo
and Buchanan, 2008), facilitated by extremely strong and mostly unidirectional
wind currents, long-distance dispersal in mid-latitudes in the northern hemisphere seem to be rarer. Besides wind, other possible means of dispersal include
spores being carried by migratory animals, driftwood and drifting sea ice, which
c o n t r a s t i n g p at t e r n s o f i n t e r c o n t i n e n ta l g e n e f l o w i n f u n g i
may also favour arctic fungi due to ocean currents and animal migrations (particularly birds) linking continents over shorter distances.
The implications of my results may not be restricted to species discussed in this
paper, but can be important for studies on the biodiversity, ecology and conservation of arctic fungi in general. Reconstruction of phylogeographic patterns of arctic
organisms is of paramount importance, because knowledge of both past migrational history and present-day genetic diversity are essential to improve our predictions on how arctic species and communities will respond to global change. The
high genetic diversity and the efficient long-distance dispersal capability of the
arctic taxa analysed here suggest that these species, and perhaps other arctic fungi
as well, will probably be able to track their potential niche in the changing Arctic.
Acknowledgements
This research was sponsored by the University of Alaska International Polar
Year Office, the National Centre for Biosystematics (University of Oslo) and
the Humboldt Foundation. I thank the following persons for providing specimens:€ Katriina Bendiksen, Ronald Daanen, Dmitry Dobrynin, Arve Elvebakk,
Guido Grosse, Gro Gulden, Alexander Kovalenko, Patrick Kuss, François Lutzoni,
David McGuire, Molly McMullen, Olga Morozova, Claude Roy, Siri Rui, Nina
Sazanova, Lutz Schirrmeister, Einar Timdal, Ina Timling, Irina Urbnavichene
and Mikhail Zhurbenko. Special thanks go to D. Lee Taylor (University of Alaska
Fairbanks) for the attentive mentoring he provided during my 5-year stay in Alaska.
Also, I am grateful to Christian Brochmann (University of Oslo) and Frank Kauff
(University of Kaiserslautern) for their financial and professional support during
research stays at their institutes, and to Mikhail Zhurbenko for his hospitality at
the Komarov Botanical Institute during my sampling visit.
References
Abbott, R.J., Brochmann, C. (2003). History
and evolution of the arctic flora:€in the
footsteps of Eric Hultén. Molecular
Ecology 12, 299–213.
Abbott, R.J., Comes, H.P. (2003). Evolution
in the Arctic:€a phylogeographic
analysis of the circumarctic plant,
Saxifraga oppositifolia (Purple
saxifrage). New Phytologist 161,
211–224.
Alsos, I.G., Engelskjøn, T., Gielly, L.,
Taberlet, P., Brochmann, C. (2005).
Impact of ice ages on circumpolar
molecular diversity:€insights from
an ecological key species. Molecular
Ecology 14, 2739–2753.
Alsos, I.G., Eidesen, P.B., Ehrich, D. et€al.
(2007) Frequent long-distance plant
colonization in the changing Arctic.
Science 316, 1606–1609.
187
188
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Aylor, D.L., Price, E.W., Carbone, I.
(2006). SNAP:€Combine and Map
modules for multilocus population
genetic analysis. Bioinformatics 22,
1399–1401.
Beerli, P., Felsenstein, J. (2001). Maximumlikelihood estimation of a migration
matrix and effective population
sizes in n subpopulations by using a
coalescent approach. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences USA
98, 4563–4568.
Bergemann, S.E., Smith, M.A., Parrent,
J.L., Gilbert, G.S., Garbelotto, M.
(2009). Genetic population structure
and distribution of a fungal polypore,
Datronia caperata (Polyporaceae), in
mangrove forests of Central America.
Journal of Biogeography 36, 266–279.
Bowden, L.C., Price, E.W., Carbone, I.
(2008). SNAP Clade and Matrix,
Version 2. Department of Plant
Pathology, North Carolina State
University, Raleigh, NC. Available
at:€http://www.cals.ncsu.edu/
plantpath/faculty/carbone/home.html
(accessed on 25 February 2009).
Brochmann, C., Brysting, A.K. (2008). The
Arctic€– an evolutionary freezer? Plant
Ecology and Diversity 1, 181–195.
Brunhoff, C., Galbreath, K.E., Fedorov,
V.B., Cook, J.A., Aarola, M.
(2003). Holarctic phylogeography
of the root vole (Microtus
oeconomus):€implications for late
Quaternary biogeography of high
latitudes. Molecular Ecology 12,
957–968.
Callaghan, T.V., Björn, L.O., Chernov, Y.
et€al . (2004). Biodiversity, distributions
and adaptations of Arctic species in
the context of environmental change.
Ambio 33, 404–417.
Dalén, L., Fuglei, E., Hersteinsson, P. et€al.
(2005). Population history and genetic
structure of a circumpolar species:€the
arctic fox. Biological Journal of the
Linnean Society 84, 79–89.
Eidesen, P.B., Carlsen, T., Molau, U.,
Brochmann, C. (2007). Repeatedly
out of Beringia:€Cassiope tetragona
embraces the Arctic. Journal of
Biogeography 34, 1559–1574.
Fedorov, V.B., Goropashnaya, A.V., Jaarola,
M., Cook, J.A. (2003). Phylogeography
of lemmings (Lemmus):€no evidence
for postglacial colonization of
Arctic from the Beringian refugium.
Molecular Ecology 12, 725–731.
Fenchel, T., Finlay, B. J. (2004). Here and
there or everywhere? Response from
Fenchel and Finlay. Bioscience 54,
777–784.
Finlay, B. J. (2002). Global dispersal of freeliving microbial eukaryote species.
Science 296, 1061–1063.
Flagstad, O., Røed, K.H. (2003). Refugial
origins of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus€L.)
inferred from mitochondrial DNA
sequences. Evolution 57, 658–670.
Geml, J., Tulloss, R.E., Laursen, G.A.,
Sazanova, N.A., Taylor, D.L. (2008).
Evidence for strong inter- and
intracontinental phylogeographic
structure in Amanita muscaria, a
wind-dispersed ectomycorrhizal
basidiomycete. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 48,
694–701.
Geml, J., Kauff, F., Brochmann, C.,
Taylor, D.L. (2010). Surviving climate
changes:€high genetic diversity
and transoceanic gene flow in two
arctic-alpine lichens, Flavocetraria
cucullata and F. nivalis (Parmeliaceae,
Ascomycota). Journal of Biogeography
37, 1529–1542.
Griffiths, R.C., Tavaré, S. (1994). Ancestral
inference in population genetics.
Statistical Sciences 9, 307–319.
c o n t r a s t i n g p at t e r n s o f i n t e r c o n t i n e n ta l g e n e f l o w i n f u n g i
Hudson, R.R., Boos, D.D., Kaplan, N.L.
(1992). A statistical test for detecting
geographic subdivision. Molecular
Biology and Evolution 9, 138–151.
Markwordt, J., Doshi, R., Carbone, I.
(2003). SNAP Clade and Matrix.
Department of Plant Pathology, North
Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Available at:€http://www.cals.ncsu.
edu/plantpath/faculty/carbone/home.
html (accessed on 25 February 2009).
Marthinsen, G., Wennerbeg, L.,
Solheim, R., Lifjeld, J.T. (2008).
No phylogeographic structure in
the circumpolar snowy owl (Bubo
scandiacus). Conservation Genetics 10,
923–933.
Martiny, J.B.H., Bohannan,
B.J.M., Brown, J.H et€al. (2006).
Microbial biogeography: putting
microorganisms on the map. Nature
Reviews Microbiology 4, 102–112.
Moncalvo, J.M., Buchanan, P.K. (2008).
Molecular evidence for long distance
dispersal across the southern
hemisphere in the Ganoderma
applanatum-australe species complex
(Basidiomycota). Mycological Research
112, 425–436.
Moritz, C., Faith, D.P. (1998). Comparative
phylogeography and the identification
of genetically divergent areas for
conservation. Molecular Ecology 7,
419–429.
Moyersoen, B., Beever, R.E., Martin, F.
(2003). Genetic diversity of Pisolithus
in New€Zealand indicates multiple
long-distance dispersal from Australia.
New Phytologist 160, 569–579.
Nielsen, R., Wakeley, J. (2001).
Distinguishing migration from
isolation:€a Markov chain Monte Carlo
approach. Genetics 158, 885–896.
Oda, T., Tanaka, C., Tsuda, M.
(2004). Molecular phylogeny and
biogeography of the widely distributed
Amanita species, A. muscaria and A.
pantherina. Mycological Research 108,
885–896.
Palice, Z., Printzen, C. (2004). Genetic
variability in tropical and temperate
populations of Trapeliopsis
glaucolepidea:€evidence against
long range dispersal in a lichen with
disjunct distribution. Mycotaxon 90,
43–54.
Parmesan. C. (2006). Ecological and
evolutionary responses to recent
climate change. Annual Review of
Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 37,
637–669.
Price, E.W., Carbone, I. (2005).
SNAP:€workbench management tool
for evolutionary population genetic
analysis. Bioinformatics 21, 402–404.
Printzen, C. (2008). Uncharted terrain:€the
phylogeography of arctic and boreal
lichens. Plant Ecology and Diversity 1,
265–271.
Reiss, A.R., Ashworth, A.C., Schwert, D.P.
(1999). Molecular genetic evidence
for the post-Pleistocene divergence
of populations of the arctic-alpine
ground beetle Amara alpina (Paykull)
(Coleoptera:€Carabidae). Journal of
Biogeography 26, 785–794.
Ricklefs, R.E., Schluter, D (1993).
Species Diversity in Ecological
Communities:€Historical and
Geographical Perspectives. Chicago,
IL:€University of Chicago Press.
Schönswetter, P., Suda, J., Popp, M., WeissSchneeweiss, H., Brochmann, C.
(2007). Circumpolar phylogeography
of Juncus biglumis (Juncaceae)
inferred from AFLP fingerprints,
cpDNA sequences, nuclear DNA
content and chromosome numbers.
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
42, 92–103.
189
190
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Shen, Q., Geiser, D. M., Royse, D. J. (2002).
Molecular phylogenetic analysis of
Grifola frondosa (maitake) reveals a
species partition separating eastern
North American and Asian isolates.
Mycologia 94, 472–482.
Taylor, J.W., Turner, E., Townsend, J.P.,
Dettman, J.R., Jacobson, D. (2006).
Eukaryotic microbes, species
recognition and the geographic limits
of species:€examples from the kingdom
Fungi. Philosophical Transactions of
the Royal Society B:€Biological Science
361, 1947–1963.
Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak,€F.,
Jeanmougin, F., Higgins, D.G.
(1997). The CLUSTAL X windows
interface:€flexible strategies for
multiple sequence alignment aided
by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids
Research 25, 4876–4882.
Tremblay, N.O., Schoen, D.J. (1999).
Molecular phylogeography of Dryas
integrifolia:€glacial refugia and
postglacial recolonization. Molecular
Ecology 8, 1187–1198.
Watterson, G.A. (1975). On the number
of segregating sites in genetic models
without recombination. Theoretical
Population Biology 10, 256–276.
Wickström, L.M., Haukisalmi, V., Varis,€S.
et€al. (2003). Phylogeography of the
circumpolar Paranoplocephala
arctica species complex
(Cestoda:€Anoplocephalidae)
parasitizing collared lemmings
(Dicrostomyx spp.). Molecular Ecology
12, 3359–3371.
10
Biogeography and phylogeography of
lichen fungi and their photobionts
Silke Werth
Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, WSL Swiss Federal Research Institute,
Birmensdorf, Switzerland
10.1╇ Introduction
Lichens are the classical example of mutualistic symbiosis (de Bary, 1879). The
first researcher to recognise the dual nature of lichens was the Swiss botanist and
lichenologist Simon Schwendener (1868), whose theory on the algal–fungal association of lichens was rejected by the leading lichenologists at the time, to become
widely accepted only in the twentieth century when lichens had been resynthesised from aposymbiotic cultures for the first time (for review, see Honegger, 2000).
The lichen symbiosis is shaped by a fungus (‘mycobiont’) which forms an intimate
association with a photosynthetic partner (‘photobiont’). In the lichen symbiosis,
a single fungal species associates either with one or several species of green algae
or cyanobacteria, or sometimes with both taxa (‘tripartite’ lichen).
More than 15â•›000 species of lichen fungi are known to date, belonging to about
1000 genera (Kirk et al., 2008); 98% of these species are ascomycetes (Honegger,
2008), the remaining are basidiomycetes or fungi of unclear systematic position
(Tehler and Wedin, 2008; Printzen, 2010). In contrast, only about 100 photobiont
species (Lücking et al., 2009) belonging to about 40 genera have been reported
Biogeography of Microscopic Organisms: Is Everything Small Everywhere?, ed. Diego Fontaneto.
Published by Cambridge University Press. © The Systematics Association 2011.
192
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
(Ahmadjian, 1967; Tschermak-Woess, 1988; Büdel, 1992; Nyati et al., 2007). This
vast discrepancy in numbers implies that a large number of lichen fungi share a
common pool of photobionts. The photobionts of lichens include eukaryotic green
algae (phylum Chlorophyta), other eukaryotic algae (phylum Heterokontophyta),
as well as cyanobacteria. Most photobionts belong to four genera:€ the green
algae Trebouxia and Trentepohlia and the cyanobacteria Nostoc and Scytonema
(Ahmadjian, 1967; Tschermak-Woess, 1988; Büdel, 1992; Friedl and Büdel, 2008).
As poikilohydric organisms, lichens have an extraordinarily high stress tolerance, similar to that of the poikilohydric bryophytes (Chapter 12). When dry (< 5%
water content), the physiological activity of lichens approximates zero, and they
can survive extreme conditions€– for example, a remarkable range of temperatures
(−196 °C to +60 °C) (Kappen, 1973; Beckett et al., 2008). In an experiment performed
by the European Space Agency, two lichen species, Rhizocarpon geographicum
and Xanthoria elegans, were launched into space, and exposed to space conditions
for 16 days mounted on an Earth-orbiting satellite. Upon return to earth, the same
specimens regained full metabolic activity within 24 hours, after having survived
exposure to high-vacuum, extreme temperatures, as well as vast levels of UV and
cosmic radiation€– conditions lethal for bacteria and most other microorganisms
(Sancho et al., 2007). Another study compared the performance of the symbiotic
phenotype of the widespread foliose lichen X. elegans to that of axenic cultures
of its photobiont and mycobiont under simulated space conditions. In the symbiotic state, tolerance to environmental stresses such as exposure to vacuum and
different levels of UV radiation was considerably enhanced (de Vera et al., 2008).
Both studies highlight the remarkable ability of lichens to tolerate extreme environmental conditions.
Their ability to tolerate extreme physiological stresses distinguishes lichens as
successful colonists of habitats that few higher plants or animals are able to survive in€– the surfaces of bare rocks, leaves, wood or tree trunks. Lichens are common in most terrestrial ecosystems (Nash, 1996), and they reach especially high
abundance in extreme environments such as the Maritime Antarctic or coastal
deserts, where they may be more pervasive than vascular plants (Rundel, 1978;
Øvstedal and Lewis Smith, 2001; Seymour et al., 2005; Knudsen and Werth, 2008).
Temperate and tropical rain forests also host a high abundance and as well as an
amazing diversity of lichens (Kantvilas et al., 1985; Lücking, 2003, 2008; Goward
and Spribille, 2005; Caceres et al., 2007).
Lichen fungi are able to reproduce sexually, as well as asexually. The relative frequency of sexual and vegetative propagation is species specific; however, examples
of species are known which reproduce sexually on one continent and asexually
on another (‘species pairs’, Poelt, 1970). Few genera of lichen fungi are exclusively
asexual, most are either exclusively sexual or possess a mixed reproductive strategy (Bowler and Rundel, 1975). Sexual lichen fungi reproduce with microscopic
lichen fungi and their photobionts
ascospores (ascomycetes) or with basidiospores (basidiomycetes), both of which
contain only the fungal partner. The size of these spores ranges from a few mm,
e.g. 2–5â•›mm in Polysporina spp. (Smith et al., 2009) to 200–400â•›mm, for instance in
Varicellaria rhodocarpa (Poelt, 1969), which is a similar size range as that of pollen grains. Conidia are fungal cells which are produced by mitotic cell division.
Macroconidia have been suggested to operate as vegetative propagules in lichen
fungi. For instance, Vezdaea aestivalis has been suggested to be able to reproduce
vegetatively with macroconidia, 7–19â•›mm in size (Scheidegger, 1995). Other species
with macroconidea are Micarea spp. (Coppins, 1983) and Candelariella biatorina
(Westberg, 2007). The bacteria-sized microconidia of Xanthoria parietina do not
contain mitochondria and are thus not able to function as vegetative propagules,
which might be a common phenomenon in lichen-forming ascomycetes (Honegger
et al., 2004). Instead, microconidia have been hypothesised to be spermatia that
fertilise trichogynes to form dicaryotic, ascogenic hyphae and hence apothecia, the
fruiting bodies of ascomycetes. Asexual lichen propagules such as soredia, isidia or
thallus fragments are usually larger than spores, and contain both fungal hyphae
and photobiont cells, thus codispersing both partners of the symbiosis.
Cyanobacterial photobionts develop hormogonia, specific reproductive structures (Geitler, 1934). When in symbiotic state, green-algal lichen photobionts are
not known to form specific propagules, but algal ‘escape’ from lichen thalli under
humid conditions has been noticed (Wornik and Grube, 2010). The formation of
sporangia has been noticed from lichenised photobionts; these sporangia may
develop either into aplanospores or zoospores (Scheidegger, 1985). As they are
able to survive the gut passage of lichenivorous mites, lichen photobionts could be
dispersed by these invertebrates (Meier et al., 2002) and form free-living colonies
derived from faeces. There is evidence for the existence of free-living Trebouxia
colonies, but the free-living populations appear to be small and not persistent
(Bubrick et al., 1984; Mukhtar et al., 1994; Schroeter and Sancho, 1996; Sanders,
2005; Hedenås et al., 2007; Wornik and Grube, 2010).
Thanks to the microscopic size of their propagules, lichens should be rather
good dispersers, and dispersal distances of at least 200 m have been measured
in the field for soredia of epiphytic lichens (Werth et al., 2006a). Another argument in favour of high dispersal capability is that newly exposed substrates such
as rocks in glacier forefields or newly emerging volcanic islands have been found
to be colonised by several species within about a decade (Kristinsson, 1972;
Winchester and Harrison, 2000). The island of Surtsey, situated c. 30 km from the
mainland of Iceland and c. 15 km from the nearest island, was formed by volcanic
eruptions between 1963 and 1967. Since its emergence, Surtsey has been colonised
by 87 lichen species in a time period of 39 years and the number of species has
increased more or less continuously since the first three species were observed in
1970 (Kristinsson and Heiðmarsson, 2009).
193
194
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
In summary, due to their microscopic propagules and large stress tolerance,
lichen fungi as well as their photobionts should have the potential for substantial long-distance dispersal. Here, I present evidence from biogeography and
phylogeog�raphy relating to the hypotheses that (1) current ranges of lichen fungi
and their photobionts are a result of extensive long-distance dispersal (‘Everything
is everywhere’ hypothesis) and (2) that current ranges are the result of long-term
isolation and divergence of population (‘Vicariance’ hypothesis).
10.2╇ Biogeography of lichen fungi
Lichen fungi show distinct distribution patterns resembling those of higher
plants, and many species are very widespread (Lücking, 2003; Feuerer and
Hawksworth, 2007). Wide distributions are thought to be favoured by high dispersal ability and generalist ecological features. Moreover, older species of lichen
fungi have had more time to disperse and reach extensive distributions, relative
to younger species. Indeed, some species of lichen fungi appear to be very old, as
indicated by long net diversification intervals relative to those of insects, other
animals and higher plants (Lücking et al., 2008).
Four studies have treated the similarities of lichen biota across various regions
of the world applying a statistical framework. Martinez et al. (2003) compared the
world distributions of 66 species of Peltigera across 230 biogeographic provinces.
They identified boreal and arctic parts of North America and Europe as well as
temperate and subtropical areas in eastern Asia as the regions of highest species
richness, and with the highest frequency of endemics.
Feuerer and Hawksworth (2007) analysed the known occurrences of lichen species based on species checklists from 132 geographic areas, grouped into 35 floristic regions. They used a clustering approach to compare the species composition
among floristic regions and to group them into units relevant for lichens. The four
main geographic regions that were identified to host distinct lichen floras were a
Holarctic, a Pantropical, an Oceanian and a Subantarctic–Australian region.
Lücking (2003) analysed worldwide biogeographic relationships in foliicolous
lichens using multidimensional scaling, cluster analysis and cladistic approaches,
and found six major lichenogeographic regions€– three tropical and three extratropical lichen biota. He interpreted the similarities among Neotropic and
African Paleotropic foliicolous lichen biota as an indication of a shared Western
Gondwanan element€– sets of vicariant species that occupied a common ancestral
Gondwanan region, and were separated by continental drift (‘biotic ferry hypothesis’). In contrast, the similarities among the African Paleotropic and Australian/
Caledonian Paleotropic lichen biota were suggested to have arisen by more recent
long-distance dispersal among continents.
lichen fungi and their photobionts
Using a phylogenetic approach, Lücking et al. (2008) investigated the historical biogeography of the widespread tropical foliicolous genus Chroodiscus. They
proposed an evolutionary scenario suggesting that the present distribution of
Chroodiscus species is the result of historic dispersal events over intermediate
distances facilitated by proximity among continental shelves during the MidCretaceous, rather than recent transoceanic dispersal.
One emerging biogeographic pattern from the various studies of lichen fungi is
that at the species level, distributions are often far more widespread than those of
phanerogams, as indicated by the few biogeographic regions that could be defined
based on floristic similarities (Lücking, 2003; Feuerer and Hawksworth, 2007).
Moreover, the classical biogeographic studies have pointed out ecological similarities among the distribution patterns of lichen fungi.
One common problem of the biogeographic studies of lichens that rely on distribution patterns of morphospecies (i.e. morphologically defined species) is that
at least a part of the widely distributed fungal morphospecies could be genetically incompatible, cryptic species with more restricted distributions (e.g. Kroken
and Taylor, 2001; Lücking, 2003). Another major problem is that current distribution patterns do not allow conclusions about the historical processes that caused
them:€similar distributions observed today may reflect completely different underlying histories (Otte et al., 2005). It is thus to be expected that species with the same
distribution type will exhibit a variety of different phylogeographic patterns and
that the role of long-distance dispersal vs. vicariance in creating wide ranges and
disjunctions may vary among species. Probably the most convincing evidence to
investigate the phenomenon of wide and disjunct ranges and to clarify the role of
long-distance dispersal in creating them comes from molecular studies€– in particular those that test specific hypotheses about the divergence of populations in
different geographic regions, or on different continents.
10.2.1╇ Wide distributions
If dispersal were no factor constraining the geographic distribution of lichen
fungi, cosmopolitan or wide distributions should be relatively common. Indeed,
many lichen fungi have astoundingly wide geographic distributions, across multiple climatic zones or continents; such widespread distributions are rare in higher
plants (Otte et al., 2002). Lobaria pulmonaria ranges across most of the northern
hemisphere including subtropical, Mediterranean, temperate and boreal woodlands and has a few occurrences on the southern hemisphere (Yoshimura, 1971), a
distribution which has been described as incomplete circum-bipolar and tropical
montane/subalpine. Other examples of species following this distribution type
are Hypogymnia physodes and Platismatia glauca (Litterski, 1999). Other lichen
fungi are circumpolar, with widespread distributions in the northern hemisphere,
e.g. Cladonia coniocraea (Litterski, 1999), some with circumpolar arctic-alpine
195
196
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
distributions such as Melanelia tominii (Otte et al., 2005). Another type of wide
distribution occurs in tropical and subtropical areas and those species may also
reach temperate or boreal oceanic areas (Litterski, 1999). Cetraria aculeata and C.
muricata are widespread in the northern hemisphere including the Mediterranean
and Arctic zone, with additional occurrences in the tropics and in South America,
South Africa and Antarctica (Kärnefelt, 1986).
Wide distributions that are ecologically structured are indeed very common
among lichen fungi, but only few taxa are truly cosmopolitan (Litterski, 1999; Otte
et al., 2002, 2005). Even the most widespread species do not occur everywhere€–
most show some ecological tendencies, often related to macroclimatic gradients
(Werth et al., 2005). For instance, they may grow predominantly in oceanic areas,
reflected in western distributions in North America and Eurasia (Otte et al., 2002,
2005). Moreover, in warm climates, some widespread arctic or boreal circumpolar
lichens tend to occur at high altitudes (Codogno and Sancho, 1991). Therefore, the
various geographic distribution patterns of widespread lichens are partly driven
by the species-specific ecology.
10.2.2╇ Disjunct distributions
Disjunct distributions are known for numerous lichens. For example, several
disjunct lichen fungi are known from the boreal zone of western Fennoscandia,
Newfoundland and the Pacific Northwest region of North America; notable examples of this distribution pattern are Cavernularia hultenii, Erioderma pedicellatum
and Lobaria hallii (Ahlner, 1948; Bjerke, 2003; Otte et al., 2005).
Other lichens exhibit impressive disjunctions between the southern and northern hemisphere (‘bipolar’ distribution, Galloway and Aptroot, 1995). Some species
showing circum-bipolar disjunctions are completely absent in the tropics; examples include Parmeliopsis ambigua and Verrucaria maura (Litterski, 1999). Others
are additionally found in tropical montane and subalpine areas (Litterski, 1999),
and are then often widespread in the cool and temperate zones of the northern
and southern hemisphere. In subtropical and tropical climates, these species only
occur in higher altitudes, corresponding to montane and subalpine zones; e.g.
Cladonia rangiferina (Litterski, 1999).
10.2.3╇ Endemic distributions
Possible dispersal restrictions in lichen fungi should be reflected in endemic distribution patterns. Indeed, several areas of the world are known to host endemic
lichen fungi; examples include the European (Otte et al., 2002) and North American
Mediterranean region (Moberg and Nash, 1999; Nash et al., 2002), Macaronesia
(Krog and Østhagen, 1978, 1980), or the Galapagos Islands (Aptroot and Bungartz,
2007)€– largely regions which also harbour endemic vascular plant floras. However,
lichen fungi may be restricted in distribution for several reasons other than
lichen fungi and their photobionts
dispersal limitation. First, many rare and threatened species have a very specialised ecology€– e.g. specific microclimatic or habitat-related requirements€– which
may only be met in a small geographic area. In these cases, even if dispersal were
extensive, it would not lead to successful establishment of new individuals unless
the specialised ecological conditions are met. Second, some endemics may have
arisen through recent speciation, and may not have had enough time to increase
their distribution ranges. Third, it cannot be excluded that some sexual lichen
fungi are highly specialised with respect to their photobionts and that restricted
distributions might result from lack of suitable algal strains. Fourth, the ranges of
some endemic species may be poorly known, and they may turn out to be more
widespread than anticipated, when under scrutiny.
For all these reasons, it is to be expected that endemic lichen fungi are a rather
heterogeneous group and that there is no common underlying process which has
led to their current distribution.
10.3╇ Phylogeography of lichen fungi
Are wide intercontinental and disjunct distributions the remaining fragments of
historically continuous distributions? Or, have populations on different continents
been founded by long-distance dispersal? If the latter is true, do the disjunctions
simply reflect the ecology of widely dispersing taxa, excluding them from occurrences in intermediate sites (Otte et al., 2005)? Some observations have been made
that favour the dispersal hypothesis. The similarity among lichen biota of the
Antarctic islands is apparently highly correlated with south polar wind patterns,
rather than with geographic distance (Muñoz et al., 2004). Similarly, the sharing
of species of Ramalina spp. among different volcanic islands in the New Zealand
geographic area largely resembles inter-island connectivity by wind (Bannister
and Blanchon, 2003). If long-distance dispersal was indeed a frequent phenomenon, this should be reflected in the sharing of identical genotypes around the
poles in regions of high wind connectivity, and phylogeographic studies of DNA
sequence variation may shed light on this phenomenon.
However, current ranges may also reflect palaeodistributions across formerly
connected land masses which got separated by continental drift (Lücking, 2003).
In these cases, no long-distance dispersal would be necessary to explain current
intercontinental distributions. Given the long time frame, one would expect speciation; various congeneric phylogenetic species might in this case occupy different
continents.
Wide intercontinental and disjunct ranges could also have been created either
by many long-distance (e.g. intercontinental) events, or few long-distance but a lot
of dispersal over medium or short distances founding intermediate populations
197
198
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
acting as ‘stepping stones’, which may or may not have survived to the present
time. If intercontinental long-distance dispersal was a common phenomenon in
lichens, one should expect to see genetic homogeneity of populations distributed
on different continents. If dispersal were rare, and it occurred mainly over shorter
distances and via intermediate stepping stone populations, one would predict substantial genetic differentiation among lichen populations from different contin�
ents, and from different geographic regions.
Another important aspect regarding long-distance dispersal of lichen fungi is its
timing throughout the evolutionary history of species. Even in cases where longdistance dispersal may seem an unlikely possibility at present, it could be that
at some point in the past, specific environmental conditions facilitated dispersal.
Accordingly, the relative role of dispersal (and vicariance) may vary throughout
the evolutionary history of a species. Moreover, whether one can successfully
detect intercontinental long-distance dispersal, for example using demographic
genetic analyses, depends on how many generations have passed since; such historic genetic signals tend to fade over time, eventually to become undetectable
(Excoffier et al., 2009).
10.3.1╇ Molecular studies supporting extensive gene flow
While intercontinental dispersal with bird vectors or through wind currents
has been proposed to be important in creating disjunct bipolar distribution patterns (Galloway and Aptroot, 1995), few studies so far have shown intercontinental long-distance dispersal in lichen fungi. Buschbom (2007) studied migration
and divergence in Porpidia flavicunda, a circumpolar arctic lichen fungus. There
was substantial genetic differentiation of a Canadian population from populations in Europe and Greenland. However, haplotypes were widely shared among
geographic regions, and substantial transoceanic migration was inferred for
P. flavicunda.
Similarly, substantial gene flow was suggested for the bipolar disjunct lichen
fungi Cladonia arbuscula and C. mitis, directed towards the southern hemisphere
– either via stepping stone populations in the Andes, or through intercontinental
long-distance dispersal across the equator (Myllys et al., 2003). The C. arbuscula
and C. mitis consisted of one clade including all samples of C. mitis, and three
clades with specimens of C. arbuscula. The clades showed no geographic structure€– for both fungal species, samples from South America occurred intermingled with samples from northern Europe.
Both examples above are drawn from taxa with a widespread distribution in
arctic parts of the northern hemisphere. Other arctic lichen fungi also show little population differentiation and high migration rates, supporting the dispersal hypothesis (Chapter 9). The high gene flow inferred from taxa located at high
latitudes corresponds well with the observation of high wind connectivity among
lichen fungi and their photobionts
sites, which may facilitate efficient long-distance dispersal (Muñoz et al., 2004).
Moreover, the genetic similarities among populations of arctic lichen fungi may
reflect their biogeographic history, as arctic taxa may not have experienced severe
population bottlenecks during the Pleistocene glaciations, when boreal and temperate species were limited to refugia (Hewitt, 1999).
10.3.2╇ Molecular studies supporting restricted gene flow
The majority of phylogeographic studies suggest that gene flow is restricted among
populations of lichen fungi, and intercontinental long-distance dispersal is rare
(Printzen et al., 2003; Palice and Printzen, 2004; Walser et al., 2005; Altermann,
2009; Otálora et al., 2010). Even along continuous ranges, some lichen fungi exhibit
striking geographic genetic structure (Walser et al., 2005; Werth et al., 2006b, 2007;
Cassie and Piercey-Normore, 2008; Altermann, 2009; Widmer, 2009).
Walser et al. (2005) compared populations of Lobaria pulmonaria from Europe
and western North America, and the allele sizes of two fungal and two algal microsatellite markers sensu Widmer et al. (2010) differed markedly among populations
from the two continents, suggesting that intercontinental dispersal of both symbionts must be rare.
Printzen et al. (2003) studied phylogeographic patterns in the disjunct
lichen fungus Cavernularia hultenii, a species distributed in northern Europe,
Newfoundland and western North America and tightly associated with oceanic
boreal coniferous forests. The shallow genealogy of C. hultenii DNA sequence data
with the occurrence of region-specific tip haplotypes suggested the fragmentation of a continuous ancestral distribution. Indeed, during the Mid-Pliocene
warming period, coniferous forests were widespread in humid northern areas,
promoting the occurrence of a more or less continuous distribution of C. hultenii,
which became fragmented when the boreal forest belt shifted southwards into
drier continental areas during the Pleistocene. Moreover, while no evidence for
recent intercontinental long-distance dispersal was found for C. hultenii, there
was support for recent population expansion in connection with a postglacial
range expansion of the lichen fungus into previously glaciated regions of western
North America.
The lichen fungus Trapeliopsis glaucolepidea exhibits a disjunct range in Europe,
East Africa, New Guinea and tropical America. Using DNA sequences from central America and Europe, Palice and Printzen (2004) found no overlap of haplotypes among continents, but the populations on both continents did not represent
monophyletic lineages€ – one haplotype found in Europe was closely related to
haplotypes from central America, whereas the remaining European haplotypes
represented two distinct European lineages. The results suggested the absence
of recent intercontinental long-distance dispersal, and the long-term isolation of
populations on the two continents.
199
200
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Phylogenetic analyses showed that the species pair Letharia vulpina and
L. columbiana contained six evolutionary lineages which may represent cryptic
species; some of these had non-overlapping geographic distributions (Kroken and
Taylor, 2001). A second example of a widespread lichen fungus with geographically restricted evolutionary lineages is Parmelia saxatilis. This species exhibited
two monophyletic clades, one of which was restricted to either oceanic or cold
climates, while the other occurred in the Mediterranean region (Crespo et al.,
2002). Third, the species complex Leptogium furfuraceum/L. pseudofurfuraceum
contained four monophyletic evolutionary lineages, which may represent cryptic
species (Otálora et al., 2010). Europe, North and South America and East Africa
each hosted a different evolutionary lineage. Interestingly, South American speci�
mens were more closely related to individuals from East Africa, rather than to
those from North America. Rare episodes of transoceanic dispersal, followed by
genetic divergence in isolation, characterised the evolution of the species complex and the long-distance dispersal events predated the Pleistocene (Otálora
et al., 2010).
Taking into account the previous results from the above fungal species which
exhibited geographically restricted evolutionary lineages, it is to be expected that
numerous other widespread lichen fungi may include different evolutionary lineages in contrasting parts of their ranges. The distinct geographic structure of the
fungal side of the symbiosis may facilitate adaptation to local environmental conditions. Future studies should focus on investigating the adaptive component of
genetic variability in populations of lichen fungi.
10.3.3╇ Conclusions regarding the ‘Everything is everywhere’
hypothesis
Is the ‘Everything is everywhere’ hypothesis true for lichen fungi, taking into
account the results of distribution-based and molecular studies, or does the
‘Vicariance’ hypothesis receive support? It is important to emphasise that our current knowledge of the biogeography of lichen fungi is very limited, which makes it
hard to draw general conclusions.
Nevertheless, both hypotheses have received some support. Among the few
biogeographic studies of lichen fungi, the ‘Everything is everywhere’ hypothesis has been empirically supported by two molecular studies so far (section 10.3.1). The remaining studies supported the ‘Vicariance’ hypothesis, for
instance by inferring substantial genetic divergence among populations from
different geographic regions or continents, or by revealing the existence of cryptic species (section 10.3.2). Thus, the importance of long-distance dispersal vs.
vicariance seems to depend largely on the species under consideration, and its
species-specific biogeographic history. Given the large diversity of lichen fungi
and the complexity of their biological interactions, ecological relationships and
lichen fungi and their photobionts
biogeographic histories, it does not come as a surprise that one hypothesis does
not fit all.
10.4╇ Geographic patterns of photobionts
The biogeographic patterns of lichen photobionts at the species level have received
little attention, which may partly reflect taxonomic uncertainties. Photobionts are
traditionally identified based on their morphology, and for many genera, phylogenies that amalgamate morphology with molecular phylogenies are still lacking. Also, for several groups of lichen photobionts, species concepts still require
clarification, and algal morphospecies may contain multiple phylogenetic species
(Kroken and Taylor, 2000; Blaha et al., 2006; Skaloud and Peksa, 2010). Novel species and evolutionary lineages of photobionts are still being discovered routinely
in molecular investigations (Helms et al., 2001; Blaha et al., 2006; Lücking et al.,
2009; Skaloud and Peksa, 2010).
The probably most well-studied photobiont genus in terms of molecular phylogeny is Trebouxia (Friedl and Rokitta, 1997; Dahlkild et al., 2001; Helms et al.,
2001). However, even for this genus, no detailed biogeographic studies have as of
yet been published. Some species of this genus are widely distributed (Blaha et€a l.,
2006). For instance, the morphospecies T. impressa is known from Antarctica and
Europe and T. jamesii s.l. has additionally been reported from North America
(Romeike et al., 2002; Blaha et al., 2006). Also some genotypes of Trebouxia spp.
are widespread across Europe (Wornik and Grube, 2010).
Besides unclear species concepts, a second complication for elucidating biogeographic patterns of the photobionts is that photobiont species are frequently
associated with a large set of fungal species, and across the distributional range
of a particular lichen-forming fungal species, the photobiont partner may change
(Kroken and Taylor, 2000). Thus, photobiont distribution patterns may not necessarily mirror the distribution of fungal species. Third, some photobiont species
may occur in free-living populations or in aerial algal assemblages (TschermakWoess, 1978; Bubrick et al., 1984; Mukhtar et al., 1994; Rindi and Guiry, 2003;
Sanders, 2005; Handa et al., 2007; Hedenås et al., 2007), and biogeographic studies
of a particular photobiont species would need to sample from these populations
as well. For these reasons, the biogeography of photobionts at the species level is
rather tricky to study, and still poorly known. Nevertheless, some interesting biogeographic patterns have been revealed.
One pattern that has long been recognised, is that lichens with Trebouxia photobionts are more or less ubiquitous whereas lichens with Trentepohlia photobionts
(e.g. Roccellaceae) are most common in the Mediterranean, subtropics and tropics
(Rundel, 1978). The algal group Trentepohliales is most frequent and diverse in low
201
202
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
latitudes (Rindi and Lopez-Bautista, 2008), and the increasing frequency of association with Trentepohlia spp. towards the equator may reflect the overall abundance
of this algal group. In an ecophysiological study, Nash et al. (1987) determined the
cold resistance of lichens associated with Trentepohlia vs. Trebouxia. They found
that lichens that associated with Trentepohlia spp. had a much lower tolerance of
cold temperatures, which suggested that sensitivity to freezing might be one of
the reasons why Trentepohlia-associated lichens are generally found in warmer
areas than those associated with Trebouxia. Moreover, the drought tolerance of
Trebouxia spp. appears to be higher than that of Trentepohlia spp. (Scheidegger C.,
personal communication).
Photobiont species are often associated with particular environmental conditions. For instance, several species seem to be associated with specific habitat
types (Yahr et al., 2006; Werth and Sork, 2010). Some species of Trebouxia appear to
occur predominantly in cold climates, e.g. high altitudes or latitudes, whereas others are rare under such conditions (Blaha et al., 2006; Ohmura et al., 2006; Nelsen
and Gargas, 2009), or occur in tropical climates (Cordeiro et al., 2005), pointing to
different ecological amplitudes.
In some lichens, considerable photobiont variation has been observed within
populations (Wornik and Grube, 2010). Also, the same fungal species was found
to be associated with multiple photobiont species in the same site (GuzowKrzeminska, 2006). In contrast, other lichen fungi are associated with different
photobiont species in contrasting parts of their ranges (Blaha et al., 2006; Nelsen
and Gargas, 2009). Moreover, the photobiont populations associated with several
lichen fungi have been shown to exhibit substantial genetic structure related to
geography, habitat or both€ – more structure than their mycobionts (Yahr et al.,
2006; Altermann, 2009; Nelsen and Gargas, 2009; Werth and Sork, 2010). The association with a spatially structured, locally adapted photobiont pool enables lichen
fungi to survive in different habitats, and to be capable of surviving under various selection pressures (Blaha et al., 2006; Nelsen and Gargas, 2009; Werth and
Sork, 2010). These examples highlight that despite the wide distributions of many
lichen fungi and presumably many photobiont species, the lichen symbiosis is not
an association among random partners, but is fine-tuned in space, along environmental gradients.
Acknowledgements
I cordially thank Diego Fontaneto for inviting me to make this contribution, and
Christian Printzen for suggesting me as an author. Ariel Bergamini, Christoph
Scheidegger and Martin Westberg provided highly appreciated comments on
a previous draft. This work received financial support from the Swiss National
lichen fungi and their photobionts
Foundation (grants 3100AO-105830, 31003A_1276346/1, PBBEA-111207) and
Bundesamt für Umwelt BAFU.
References
Ahlner, S. (1948). Utbredningstyper
bland nordiska barrträdslavar. Acta
Phytogeographica Suecica 22, 1–257.
Ahmadjian, V. (1967). A guide to
the algae occurring as lichen
symbionts:€isolation, culture, cultural
physiology, and identification.
Phycologia 6, 127–160.
Altermann, S. (2009). Geographic Structure
in a Symbiotic Mutualism. PhD thesis,
University of California at Santa Cruz.
Aptroot, A., Bungartz, F. (2007). The lichen
genus Ramalina on the Galapagos.
Lichenologist 36, 519–542.
Bannister, J.M., Blanchon, D.J. (2003).
The lichen genus Ramalina Ach.
(Ramalinaceae) on the outlying
islands of the New Zealand geographic
area. Lichenologist 35, 137–146.
Beckett, R.P., Kranner, I., Minibayeva,
F.V. (2008). Stress physiology
and the symbiosis. In Nash, T.H.
(ed.), Lichen Biology, pp. 134–151.
Cambridge:€Cambridge University
Press.
Bjerke, J.W. (2003). The northern
distribution range of Lobaria hallii
in Europe and Greenland. Graphis
Scripta 14, 27–31.
Blaha, J., Baloch, E., Grube, M. (2006).
High photobiont diversity associated
with the euryoecious lichen-forming
ascomycete Lecanora rupicola
(Lecanoraceae, Ascomycota).
Biological Journal of the Linnean
Society 88, 283–293.
Bowler, P.A., Rundel, P.W. (1975).
Reproductive strategies in lichens.
Botanical Journal of the Linnean
Society 70, 325–340.
Bubrick, P., Galun, M., Frensdorff,
A. (1984). Observations on freeliving Trebouxia Depuymaly and
Pseudotrebouxia Archibald, and
evidence that both symbionts from
Xanthoria parientina (L.) Th. Fr. can
be found free-living in nature. New
Phytologist 97, 455–462.
Büdel, B. (1992). Taxonomy of lichenized
procaryotic blue-green algae. In
Reisser, W. (ed.), Algae and symbioses,
pp. 301–324. Bristol:€Biopress.
Buschbom, J. (2007). Migration between
continents:€geographical structure
and long-distance gene flow in
Porpidia flavicunda (lichen-forming
Ascomycota). Molecular Ecology 16,
1835–1846.
Caceres, M.E.S., Lücking, R., Rambold,€G.
(2007). Phorophyte specificity and
environmental parameters versus
stochasticity as determinants for
species composition of corticolous
crustose lichen communities in the
Atlantic rain forest of northeastern
Brazil. Mycological Progress 6, 117–136.
Cassie, D.M., Piercey-Normore,€M.D.
(2008). Dispersal in a sterile
lichen-forming fungus,
Thamnolia subuliformis
(Ascomycotina:€Icmadophilaceae).
Botany-Botanique 86, 751–762.
Codogno, M., Sancho, L.G. (1991).
Distribution patterns of the lichen
family Umbilicariaceae in the W
Mediterranean Basin (Iberian
203
204
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Peninsula, S France and Italy).
Botanika Chronika 10, 901–910.
Coppins, B.J. (1983). A taxonomic study of
the lichen genus Micarea in Europe.
Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural
History), Botany Series 11, 17–214.
Cordeiro, L.M.C., Reis, R.A., Cruz, L.M.
et al. (2005). Molecular studies of
photobionts of selected lichens from
the coastal vegetation of Brazil. FEMS
Microbiology Ecology 54, 381–390.
Crespo, A., Molina, M.C., Blanco, O. et al.
(2002). rDNA ITS and beta-tubulin
gene sequence analyses reveal
two monophyletic groups within
the cosmopolitan lichen Parmelia
saxatilis. Mycological Research 106,
788–795.
Dahlkild, A., Kallersjo, M., Lohtander, K.,
Tehler, A. (2001). Photobiont diversity
in the Physciaceae (Lecanorales). The
Bryologist 104, 527–536.
de Bary, H.A. (1879). The Phenomenon
of Symbiosis. Privately printed in
Strasburg.
de Vera, J.P., Rettberg, P., Ott, S. (2008).
Life at the limits:€Capacities of isolated
and cultured lichen symbionts to
resist extreme environmental stresses.
Origins of Life and Evolution of
Biospheres 38, 457–468.
Excoffier, L., Foll, M., Petit, R.J. (2009).
Genetic consequences of range
expansions. Annual Review of Ecology
Evolution and Systematics 40, 481–501.
Feuerer, T., Hawksworth, D.L. (2007).
Biodiversity of lichens, including a
world-wide analysis of checklist data
based on Takhtajan’s floristic regions.
Biodiversity and Conservation 16, 85–98.
Friedl, T., Büdel, B. (2008). Photobionts.
In Nash, T.H. (ed.), Lichen Biology,
pp. 9–26. Cambridge:€Cambridge
University Press.
Friedl, T., Rokitta, C. (1997). Species
relationships in the lichen
alga Trebouxia (Chlorophyta,
Trebouxiophyceae):€Molecular
phylogenetic analyses of nuclearencoded large subunit rRNA gene
sequences. Symbiosis 23, 125–148.
Galloway, D.J., Aptroot, A. (1995). Bipolar
lichens:€A review. Cryptogamic Botany
5, 184–191.
Geitler, L. (1934). Beiträge zur Kenntnis
der Flechtensymbiose. Journal für
Protistenkunde 82, 51–85.
Goward, T., Spribille, T. (2005).
Lichenological evidence for the
recognition of inland rain forests in
western North America. Journal of
Biogeography 32, 1209–1219.
Guzow-Krzeminska, B. (2006). Photobiont
flexibility in the lichen Protoparmeliopsis
muralis as revealed by ITS rDNA
analyses. Lichenologist 38, 469–476.
Handa, S., Ohmura, Y., Nakano, T.,
Nakahara-Tsubota, M. (2007). Airborne
green microalgae (Chlorophyta) in
snowfall. Hikobia 15, 109–120.
Hedenås, H., Blomberg, P., Ericson, L.
(2007). Significance of old aspen
(Populus tremula) trees for the
occurrence of lichen photobionts.
Biological Conservation 135, 380–387.
Helms, G., Friedl, T., Rambold, G.,
Mayrhofer, H. (2001). Identification
of photobionts from the lichen family
Physciaceae using algal-specific ITS
rDNA sequencing. Lichenologist 33,
73–86.
Hewitt, G.M. (1999). Post-glacial
re-colonization of European biota.
Biological Journal of the Linnean
Society 68, 87–112.
Honegger, R. (2000). Simon Schwendener
(1829–1919) and the dual hypothesis of
lichens. Bryologist 103, 307–313.
lichen fungi and their photobionts
Honegger, R. (2008). Mycobionts. In Nash,
T.H. (ed.), Lichen Biology, pp. 27–39.
Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Honegger, R., Zippler, U., Gansner, H.,
Scherrer, S. (2004). Mating systems in
the genus Xanthoria (lichen-forming
ascomycetes). Mycological Research
108, 480–488.
Kantvilas, G., James, P.W., Jarman, S.J.
(1985). Macrolichens in Tasmanian
rainforests. Lichenologist 17, 67–84.
Kappen, L. (1973). Response to extreme
environments. In Ahmadjian, V.,
Hale,€M.E. (eds.), The Lichens,
pp. 311–380. New York, NY:€Academic
Press.
Kärnefelt, I. (1986). The genera Bryocaulon,
Coelocaulon and Cornicularia and
formerly associated taxa. Opera
Botanica 86, 1–90.
Kirk, P.M., Cannon, P.F., Minter, D.W.,
Stalpers, J.A. (2008). Dictionary of the
Fungi. Wallingford:€CAB International.
Knudsen, K., Werth, S. (2008). Lichens
of the Granite Mountains, Sweeney
Granite Mountain desert research
center, southwestern Mojave Desert,
San Bernardino county, California.
Evansia 25, 15–20.
Kristinsson, H. (1972). Studies on lichen
colonization in Surtsey 1970. Surtsey
Research Programme Report 5, 77.
Kristinsson, H., Heiðmarsson, S.
(2009). Colonization of lichens on
Surtsey 1970–2006. Surtsey Research
Programme Report 12, 81–104.
Krog, H., Østhagen, H. (1978). Three new
Ramalina species from Macaronesia.
Norwegian Journal of Botany 25,
55–59.
Krog, H., Østhagen, H. (1980). The genus
Ramalina in the Canary Islands.
Norwegian Journal of Botany 27,
255–296.
Kroken, S., Taylor, J.W. (2000). Phylogenetic
species, reproductive mode, and
specificity of the green alga Trebouxia
forming lichens with the fungal genus
Letharia. The Bryologist 103, 645–660.
Kroken, S., Taylor, J.W. (2001). A gene
genealogical approach to recognize
phylogenetic species boundaries in the
lichenized fungus Letharia. Mycologia
93, 38–53.
Litterski, B. (1999). Arealkundliche
Studien€– ein Beitrag zur Bewertung
der Flechtenvielfalt. Courier
Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 215,
137–142.
Lücking, R. (2003). Takhtajan’s floristic
regions and foliicolous lichen
biogeography:€a compatibility
analysis. Lichenologist 35, 33–54.
Lücking, R. (2008). Foliicolous Lichenized
Fungi. Organization for Flora
Neotropica and The New York
Botanical Garden Press, Bronx, New
York.
Lücking, R., Papong, K., Thammathaworn,
A., Boonpragob, K. (2008). Historical
biogeography and phenotypephylogeny of Chroodiscus
(lichenized Ascomycota: Ostropales:
Graphidaceae). Journal of
Biogeography 35, 2311–2327.
Lücking, R., Lawrey, J.D., Sikaroodi, M.
et al. (2009). Do lichens domesticate
photobionts like farmers domesticate
crops? Evidence from a previously
unrecognized lineage of filamentous
cyanobacteria. American Journal of
Botany 96, 1409–1418.
Martinez, I., Burgaz, A.R., Vitikainen,€O.,
Escudero, A. (2003). Distribution
patterns in the genus Peltigera Willd.
Lichenologist 35, 301–323.
Meier, F.A., Scherrer, S., Honegger, R.
(2002). Faecal pellets of lichenivorous
mites contain viable cells of the
205
206
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
lichen-forming ascomycete Xanthoria
parietina and its green algal
photobiont, Trebouxia arboricola.
Biological Journal of the Linnean
Society 76, 259–268.
Moberg, R., Nash, T.H. (1999). The genus
Heterodermia in the Sonoran desert
area. Bryologist 102, 1–14.
Mukhtar, A., Garty, J., Galun, M. (1994).
Does the lichen alga Trebouxia
occur free-living in nature€– further
immunological evidence. Symbiosis 17,
247–253.
Muñoz, J., Felicisimo, A.M., Cabezas,
F., Burgaz, A.R., Martinez, I. (2004).
Wind as a long-distance dispersal
vehicle in the southern hemisphere.
Science 304, 1144–1147.
Myllys, L., Stenroos, S., Thell, A.,
Ahti,€T. (2003). Phylogeny of bipolar
Cladonia arbuscula and Cladonia
mitis (Lecanorales, Euascomycetes).
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
27, 58–69.
Nash, T.H. (1996). Lichen Biology.
Cambridge:€Cambridge University
Press.
Nash, T.H., Kappen, L., Lösch, R., Larson,
D.W., Matthes-Sears, U. (1987). Cold
resistance of lichens with Trentepohlia
or Trebouxia photobionts from the
North American West coast. FLORA
179, 241–251.
Nash, T.H., Ryan, B.D., Gries, C., Bungartz,
F. (2002). Lichen Flora of the Greater
Sonoran Desert region. Tempe,
AZ:€Arizona State University.
Nelsen, M.P., Gargas, A. (2009). Symbiont
flexibility in Thamnolia vermicularis
(Pertusariales:€Icmadophilaceae).
Bryologist 112, 404–417.
Nyati, S., Beck, A., Honegger, R. (2007).
Fine structure and phylogeny of
green algal photobionts in the
microfilamentous genus Psoroglaena
(Verrucariaceae, lichen-forming
ascomycetes). Plant Biology 9, 390–399.
Ohmura, Y., Kawachi, M., Kasai, F.,
Watanabe, M.M., Takeshita, S. (2006).
Genetic combinations of symbionts
in a vegetatively reproducing lichen,
Parmotrema tinctorum, based on ITS
rDNA sequences. Bryologist 109, 43–59.
Otálora, M.A.G., Martínez, I., Aragón, G.,
Molina, M.C. (2010). Phylogeography
and divergence date estimates of a
lichen species complex with a disjunct
distribution pattern. American Journal
of Botany 97, 216–223.
Otte, V., Esslinger, T.L., Litterski, B. (2002).
Biogeographical research on European
species of the lichen genus Physconia.
Journal of Biogeography 29, 1125–1141.
Otte, V., Esslinger, T.L., Litterski, B. (2005).
Global distribution of the European
species of the lichen genus Melanelia
Essl. Journal of Biogeography 32,
1221–1241.
Øvstedal, D.O., Lewis Smith, R.I. (2001).
Lichens of Antarctica and South
Georgia. A Guide to their Identification
and Ecology. Cambridge:€Cambridge
University Press.
Palice, Z., Printzen, C. (2004). Genetic
variability in tropical and temperate
populations of Trapeliopsis
glaucolepidea:€Evidence against longrange dispersal in a lichen with disjunct
distribution. Mycotaxon 90, 43–54.
Poelt, J. (1969). Bestimmungsschlüssel
europäischer Flechten. Cramer,
Germany.
Poelt, J. (1970). Das Konzept der
Artenpaare bei den Flechten.
Cladistics 125, 77–81.
Printzen, C. (2010). Lichen systematics:€the
role of morphological and molecular
data to reconstruct phylogenetic
relationships. Progress in Botany 71,
233–275.
lichen fungi and their photobionts
Printzen, C., Ekman, S., Tønsberg,€T.
(2003). Phylogeography of
Cavernularia hultenii:€evidence
of slow genetic drift in a widely
disjunct lichen. Molecular Ecology 12,
1473–1486.
Rindi, F., Guiry, M.D. (2003). Composition
and distribution of subaerial algal
assemblages in Galway City, western
Ireland. Cryptogamie Algologie 24,
245–267.
Rindi, F., Lopez-Bautista, J.M.
(2008). Diversity and ecology of
Trentepohliales (Ulvophyceae,
Chlorophyta) in French Guiana.
Cryptogamie Algologie 29, 13–43.
Romeike, J., Friedl, T., Helms, G., Ott, S.
(2002). Genetic diversity of algal and
fungal partners in four species of
Umbilicaria (lichenized ascomycetes)
along a transect of the Antarctic
peninsula. Molecular Biology and
Evolution 19, 1209–1217.
Rundel, P.W. (1978). Ecological
relationships of desert fog zone
lichens. The Bryologist 81, 277–293.
Sancho, L.G., de la Torre, R., Horneck,
G. et al. (2007). Lichens survive in
space:€results from the 2005 LICHENS
experiment. Astrobiology 7, 443–454.
Sanders, W.B. (2005). Observing
microscopic phases of lichen life cycles
on transparent substrata placed in situ.
Lichenologist 37, 373–382.
Scheidegger, C. (1985). Systematische
Studien zur Krustenflechte
Anzina carneonivea (Trapeliaceae,
Lecanorales). Nova Hedwigia 41,
191–218.
Scheidegger, C. (1995). Reproductive
strategies in Vezdaea (Lecanorales,
lichenized Ascomycetes):€a lowtemperature scanning electron
microscopy study of a ruderal species.
Cryptogamic Botany 5, 163–171.
Schroeter, B., Sancho, L.G. (1996). Lichens
growing on glass in Antarctica.
Lichenologist 28, 385–390.
Schwendener, S. (1868). Ueber die
Beziehungen zwischen Algen und
Flechtengonidien. Botanische Zeitung
26, 289–292.
Seymour, F.A., Crittenden, P.D., Dyer, P.S.
(2005). Sex in the extremes:€lichenforming fungi. Mycologist 19, 51–58.
Skaloud, P., Peksa, O. (2010). Evolutionary
inferences based on ITS rDNA and
actin€sequences reveal extensive
diversity of the common lichen alga
Asterochloris (Trebouxiophyceae,
Chlorophyta). Molecular Phylogenetics
and Evolution 54, 36–46.
Smith, C.W., Aptroot, A., Coppins, B. et€al.
(2009). The Lichens of Great Britain
and Ireland. London:€British Lichen
Society.
Tehler, A., Wedin, M. (2008). Systematics
of lichenized fungi. In Nash, T.H.
(ed.), Lichen Biology, pp. 336–352.
Cambridge:€Cambridge University
Press.
Tschermak-Woess, E. (1978). Myrmecia
reticulata as a phycobiont and freeliving€– free-living Treouxia€– problem
of Stenocybe septata. Lichenologist 10,
69–79.
Tschermak-Woess, E. (1988). The algal
partner. In Galun, M. (ed.), CRC
Handbook of Lichenology, pp. 39–92.
Boca Raton, FL:€CRC Press.
Walser, J.C., Holderegger, R., Gugerli,
F., Hoebee, S.E., Scheidegger, C.
(2005). Microsatellites reveal regional
population differentiation and
isolation in Lobaria pulmonaria, an
epiphytic lichen. Molecular Ecology 14,
457–467.
Werth, S., Sork, V.L. (2010). Identity and
genetic structure of the photobiont
of the epiphytic lichen Ramalina
207
208
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
menziesii on three oak species in
southern California. American Journal
of Botany 97, 821–830.
Werth, S., Tømmervik, H., Elvebakk,€A.
(2005). Epiphytic macrolichen
communities along regional gradients
in northern Norway. Journal of
Vegetation Science 16, 199–208.
Werth, S., Wagner, H.H., Gugerli, F.
et€al. (2006a). Quantifying dispersal
and establishment limitation in a
population of an epiphytic lichen.
Ecology 87, 2037–2046.
Werth, S., Wagner, H.H., Holderegger, R.,
Kalwij, J.M., Scheidegger, C. (2006b).
Effect of disturbances on the genetic
diversity of an old-forest associated
lichen. Molecular Ecology 15, 911–921.
Werth, S., Gugerli, F., Holderegger, R.
et al. (2007). Landscape-level gene
flow in Lobaria pulmonaria, an
epiphytic lichen. Molecular Ecology 16,
2807–2815.
Westberg, M. (2007). Candelariella
(Candelariaceae) in western United
States and northern Mexico:€the
species with biatorine apothecia.
Bryologist 110, 365–374.
Widmer, I. (2009). Evolutionary History
and Phylogeography of a Lichen
Symbiosis. Ph.D. thesis, University of
Berne, Berne.
Widmer, I., Dal Grande, F., Cornejo, C.,
Scheidegger, C. (2010). Highly variable
microsatellite markers for the fungal
and algal symbionts of the lichen
Lobaria pulmonaria and challenges in
developing biont-specific molecular
markers for fungal associations.
Fungal Biology 114, 538–544.
Winchester, V., Harrison, S.
(2000). Dendrochronology and
lichenometry:€colonization, growth
rates and dating of geomorphological
events on the east side of the
North Patagonian Icefield, Chile.
Geomorphology 34, 181–194.
Wornik, S., Grube, M. (2010). Joint
dispersal does not imply maintenance
of partnerships in lichen symbioses.
Microbial Ecology 59, 150–157.
Yahr, R., Vilgalys, R., DePriest, P.T. (2006).
Geographic variation in algal partners
of Cladonia subtenuis (Cladoniaceae)
highlights the dynamic nature of a
lichen symbiosis. New Phytologist 171,
847–860.
Yoshimura, I. (1971). The genus Lobaria
of Eastern Asia. Journal of the Hattori
Botanical Laboratory 34, 231–364.
11
Biogeography of mosses and allies:€
does size matter?
Nagore G. Medina, Isabel Draper and
Francisco Lara
Departamento de Biología (Botánica), Facultad de Ciencias,
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
11.1╇ Introduction
Bryophytes are the second largest group of embryophytes, or green land
plants, after the very diverse Angiosperms. They comprise three main lineages
(Frey, 2009; Goffinet and Shaw, 2009):€mosses (Division or Phylum Bryophyta),
that are currently estimated to include 12â•›500–13â•›0 00 species; liverworts
(Marchantiophyta), that are thought to number 5000 or a few more; and hornworts (Anthocerotophyta), with only 100–150 species. This adds up to around
18â•›0 00 species, although estimates range from 14â•›0 00 to 25â•›0 00.
Bryophytes in general, and especially mosses and liverworts, are highly successful plants. They display a high level of diversity, are almost universally present in
land environments, and play a significant role in many terrestrial and freshwater
ecosystems (Vanderpoorten and Goffinet, 2009). Although often inconspicuous,
mosses and liverworts can be found even in the world’s toughest environments,
such as freezing and hot deserts. Moreover, in some harsh environments, such as
Biogeography of Microscopic Organisms: Is Everything Small Everywhere?, ed. Diego Fontaneto.
Published by Cambridge University Press. © The Systematics Association 2011.
210
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
the epiphytic stratum of temperate woodlands or the terrestrial ecosystems of the
tundra, they are the chief group of organisms, together with lichens. Peatlands,
which cover c. 3% of the Earth’s land surface (Limpens et al., 2008), are a particular and outstanding case of habitat where bryophytes generally prevail, commonly
with species of Sphagnum as the dominant vegetation element. Even if bryophytes
are particularly diverse and luxuriant in tropical montane cloud forests and in
humid temperate woodlands, they can be found more or less abundantly in all
environments where land plants can survive (Gignac, 2001). Furthermore, in global terms, bryophytes contribute to a significant proportion of the production and
biomass in a variety of ecosystems (Vanderpoorten and Goffinet, 2009).
Mosses and their allies are the smallest green land plants. They can be
minute:€some leafy liverworts are almost invisible to the naked eye and the tiniest
mosses are less than 2â•›m m tall. At the opposite end, some hepatics reach 30â•›cm
and several mosses can exceed 70â•›cm in length. The majority of bryophytes, however, measure between 0.5 and 10â•›cm. They are reputed to be, both structurally
and physiologically, the ‘simplest’ land plants. Actually, bryophytes exhibit a wide
range of structural complexity, although they cannot develop complex supporting
or conducting tissues because, unlike vascular plants, bryophytes always lack lignin. The bryophyte life cycle is distinguished from that of all other embryophytes
in the predominance of the haploid generation, the gametophyte being the photosynthetic phase. Compared with tracheophytes (vascular plants, including ferns
and allies, conifers and angiosperms), the gametophyte of bryophytes is therefore
very complex. On the other hand, the diploid phase of bryophytes consists of a single sporangium on an unbranched leafless stalk, attached to the gametophyte and
nutritionally depending on it. The sporophyte generation of bryophytes is thus the
least complicated among the land plants.
Bryophytes lack mechanisms and structural systems that allow an effective control of water relations. They are therefore poikilohydrous, a trait shared with algae
and lichens, but uncommon among pteridophytes and angiosperms (Pugnaire
and Valladares, 2007). This characteristic could be interpreted in terms of physiological simplicity, but is actually an alternative and successful life strategy since
bryophytes combine poikilohydry with another essential feature:€the capacity of
maintaining latent life (quiescence) after desiccation, with a high faculty of reviviscence without damage after rehydration (Oliver et al., 2005). In fact, their ability
to survive cold and dry conditions is unparalleled in other principal plant groups
(Glime, 2007). In the absence of major barriers for gas and water exchange, the
hydration state in most bryophytes is dependent on ambient humidity. However,
many species have evolved morphological structures or architectural characteristics that modify water uptake and storage rates, and that limit water loss from shoot
surfaces. As a consequence, species of bryophytes differ greatly in their evaporative exchange properties (Rice et al., 2001). Since desiccation tolerance and other
biogeogr a phy of mosses and allies
ecophysiological traits also vary among bryophytes (Proctor, 2009), different species exhibit a broad range of physiological optima and ecological amplitudes.
Bryophytes, like pteridophytes but unlike flowering plants, propagate by means
of sexual spores (meiospores). These are produced in the capsule (sporangium) of
the sporophyte and germinate into a protonema that subsequently produces the
gametophores or green plants. Gametophytes can be monoecious and then the
processes of fertilisation and consequent generation of new sporophytes have no
special difficulties. However, among mosses dioecious species are just as common
as monoecious ones, and more so among liverworts; in some cases, sporophytes
have never been found in certain populations or even species. Bryophyte spores
are quite diverse in size, although in general they are small, usually between
10–20â•›µ m in diameter (Frahm, 2008). Hence, they are potentially adequate for wind
dispersal, which is indeed the most common dispersal mechanism, although animal and water dispersal also occur (e.g. Porley and Hodgetts, 2005; Marino et al.,
2009). There is a tremendous variation in spore production among bryophytes,
the number of spores per capsule being in the interval of 104 to 106 for most species (Vanderpoorten and Goffinet, 2009). In addition, mosses and allies propagate
through vegetative structures. Asexual propagules can be undifferentiated (fragments of gametophyte structures) or more or less specialised reproductive bodies
(brood bodies or gemmae), and have various sizes and shapes. It is suspected that
vegetative propagation plays an essential role in the dispersal of bryophytes and
it has a chief importance for colony expansion when the plants have already initiated its establishment (Glime, 2007).
Many of the characteristics of bryophytes enumerated above (size, way of life,
dispersal mechanisms, etc.) suggest that these organisms are excellent candidates
for corroborating Baas Becking’s hypothesis of ‘Everything is everywhere’ (Baas
Becking, 1934). In fact, traditional thoughts revolve around the assumptions that
(1) bryophytes display no major dispersal restrictions because of their minute
wind-transported diaspores (spores or vegetative structures for dispersal) and
(2)€ since they are small their distributions are largely depending on the microenvironment rather than on macroclimatic characteristics (cf. Schuster, 1983). In
the following, we intend to show to what extent this idea is valid nowadays. We use
both a classical approach, based on morphological concepts of taxa, and a phylogeographic approach, based on molecular data.
11.2╇ The classical approach
In classical biogeography the analysis of distribution ranges has been a keystone
in the attempts to disentangle the relative importance of the major factors affecting bryophyte distributions.
211
212
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
11.2.1╇ Wide distribution ranges
Bryophytes tend to show wider distribution ranges than flowering plants. Many
species have geographic ranges that include more than one continent, and cosmopolitan distributions are said to be relatively frequent (Shaw and Goffinet, 2000;
Frahm, 2008; Vanderpoorten and Goffinet, 2009). At the family and generic level,
worldwide distributions are more or less the rule. Thus, more than 75% of the families of bryophytes are widespread in both hemispheres (Tan and Pócs, 2000).
However, at the species level, extremely wide distributions are not as common as
could be expected. There are no accurate data on how many cosmopolitan bryophyte species there are in total, but based on regional Holarctic bryofloras we can
get some insights. Among European liverworts and hornworts the level of cosmopolitan species ranges from 3.1% (Frey et al., 2006) to 5.1% (Dierssen, 2001), for a
flora of 453 species (Grolle and Long, 2000). For mosses, following the broad criterion of Dierssen (2001), 93 European species are considered to be cosmopolitan,
which represents 7.2% of the 1292 species known from this continent (Hill et al.,
2006). Finally, in eastern North America, Crum and Anderson (1981) considered
only five mosses out of 765 to be cosmopolitan. Although the number of cosmopolitan species depends on the definition of the concept (the data on European
mosses include several species regarded as cosmopolitan that are not considered
so in the flora of eastern North America), the rates obtained are not very high in
any case. Considering that the provided data were gathered from two well-known
continents, it can be assumed that most of the world’s cosmopolitan bryophytes
are included. If this is true, the global percentage of cosmopolitan bryophytes
might be far below 1%.
The idea that very wide distributions are rare is supported by the fact that most
bryophyte species are limited to certain regions, even if their ranges are usually
larger than the ones found among other terrestrial plants. The question is whether
these distributions are restricted because of environmental factors or if there are
other meaningful biogeographic constraints. To illustrate what we mean, let us
look at the European species with affinities for a Mediterranean climate. If we
assume that bryophytes are wide-ranging plants in which transcontinental dispersal is common, it should be expected that species with marked Mediterranean
affinity in Europe occur in other parts of the world with a similar climate type.
In an unpublished study of the European species with a Mediterranean affinity
we found that 62 out of 117 (61.5%) species are restricted to the Palaearctic. Of the
remaining species, 23 (19.7%) are also present in California, 11 (9.4%) are recorded
in South Africa, seven (6.0%) occur in Chile, four (3.4%) are present in Australia,
and only one species is present in all Mediterranean climate zones. Interestingly,
many of the species from the Mediterranean basin have not established successful populations in other continents, even if they produce high quantities of small
biogeogr a phy of mosses and allies
spores (down to less than 18â•›μ m), as is the case for Orthotrichum philibertii or
Anomobryum lusitanicum. Despite their apparently having the means for spreading over long distances, a high percentage of the bryophytes show distributions
with strong geographic constraints.
Wide distribution patterns can arise from different mechanisms, such as
stepping-stone or long-distance dispersal. Stepping-stone dispersal is a result of
numerous effective short-distance dispersal events and therefore requires connections (present or past) between landmasses for range expansion and possibly implies long periods of time to attain wide ranges. Consequently, some of
the ranges discussed above, including the Mediterranean–South American disjunctions are difficult to explain solely by the stepping-stone mechanism. If longdistance dispersal is responsible for wide species ranges, dispersal could have
occurred in recent times, after the separation of landmasses. This requires that
species produce small spores and have access to adequate dispersal agents (e.g.
air currents). Whereas the transport of spores to the new locality is necessary this
is not sufficient for colonisation:€ spore survival, establishment and persistence
are also essential. Thus, for the Mediterranean species it appears that several biological or ecological features can prevent species from effective dispersal (including both transport and establishment) across long distances.
11.2.2╇ Endemic ranges
As we have seen, many bryophytes have geographically limited but relatively
large distribution areas. There are also endemic bryophytes with very restricted
distributions (narrow endemisms); among many others, good examples are
Vandiemenia ratkowskiana, a liverwort endemic to Tasmania and only known
from two localities that are separated by c. 70 km (Furuki and Dalton, 2008), or
Renauldia lycopodioides, a moss known from a few localities in Tanzania and
Kenya (O’Shea, 2006). Nonetheless, bryophytes show low levels of endemism in
most regions. Low incidence of endemism is usually understood as an indicator
of the relevance of long-distance dispersal. On the other hand, a high percentage of endemism is interpreted as indicative of a high degree of isolation of a
given flora, both in time and space, and can be related to the prevalence of shortdistance dispersal in most of the included species. Due to the high dispersal capacity of many species, a large number of bryophytes could potentially maintain
the genetic connectivity between populations, even if they grow in localities that
are several thousand kilometres apart. Under such a scenario, allopatric speciation should be relatively rare among bryophytes. In agreement with this idea,
bryophytes show significantly lower rates of endemism than flowering plants.
Some islands in the Mediterranean Sea that are known to have nearly 10%
endemic vascular plants, such as Corsica and Sardinia, have just one endemic
moss (Sotiaux et al., 2009). Other good examples are the Canary Islands, where
213
214
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Table 11.1. Percentage of endemic bryophytes in selected areas of high endemicity level.
Territories
Moss
Liverwort
Source of the data
Hawai
29
48
Staples et al., 2004; Staples and
Imada, 2006
New Caledonia
50
48
Morat, 1993
New Zealand
23
50
Fife, 1995; Engel and Glenny, 2008
Madagascar
39
?
O’Shea, 2006
Andean
mountain range
31
?
Churchill, 2009
more than 21% of the vascular plants are endemic (Machado, 2002) compared
with only 1.4% of the mosses (González-Mancebo et al., 2008). In the Iberian
Peninsula the rate of vascular plants endemism exceeds 25% (Sáinz Ollero and
Moreno Saiz, 2002), but less than 1% of the bryophyte species are endemic. In
the Galapagos Islands only 15 liverworts and six mosses are ‘proven’ endemics
(Porley and Hodgetts, 2005). Even if the rate of endemism among bryophytes is
lower than that found in larger organisms, there are however many cases around
the world where the rates of endemism indicate isolation of the floras. Typical
examples are those areas that exhibit the world’s highest endemism rates for vascular plants (exceeding 70%) and that also present corresponding rates of liverwort and moss endemism, ranging from 23% to 50% (Table 11.1). From such data
we can infer that biogeographic barriers can have different significance for bryophytes and flowering plants. Short sea distances, such as the ones that separate
the Mediterranean islands from the continent, or mountain ranges comparable
to the Pyrenees, appear not to represent true barriers for bryophyte dispersal,
whereas they are obviously limiting the distributions of a number of flowering
plants. However, this does not mean that there are no obstacles at all to bryophyte dissemination and there are many examples that indicate the existence of
barriers (not always physical). Thus, the ecologically isolated Andean region has
a significant level of bryophyte endemism, while New Zealand, New Caledonia
and Hawaii are equally unique in this respect as a consequence of their strong
geographic isolation.
Several species are potentially capable of maintaining transcontinental
connectivity between populations through long-distance dispersal, which
could prevent population differentiation even in remote islands, but it is clear
that there are a number of cases in which isolation and allopatric speciation
occur. How important then is long-distance dispersal in relation to endemism?
Surprisingly, only one of the eight endemic mosses of the British Isles produces
biogeogr a phy of mosses and allies
Fig 11.1 The epiphytic moss Orthotrichum handiense growing on the branches of
Asteriscus sericeus.
sporophytes (Smith, 2004; Porley and Hodgetts, 2005), which indicates the
relevance of the lack of sexual reproduction and spore production for maintaining isolation. Although seemingly remarkable, the case above is relatively
untypical and many endemic species do indeed produce sporophytes and high
quantities of small spores and could potentially connect even distant populations. For example, Orthotrichum handiense is a moss restricted to a small area
on Fuerteventura (Canary Islands) and represents an outstanding example of
local endemism (Figs 11.1, 11.2) because it has a population that is relatively
rich in individuals and a high production of sporophytes (Lara et al., 2003). This
shows that when evaluating the relevance of dispersal capacity and connectivity among populations, not only lack of spore production, but also many other
factors can hamper the effectiveness of dispersal, such as accessibility to transport means, survival and establishment success. In a set of experiments on
spore viability in New Zealand mosses, spores of endemic species were found
to have low survival rates after desiccation, freezing and UV exposure (van
215
216
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Fig 11.2 Location (star) of the known population of O. handiense.
Zanten and Pócs, 1981; van Zanten and Gradstein, 1988), pointing out the paramount importance of spore endurance to survive the harsh conditions during
long-distance dispersal. Equally critical but less explored is the establishment
phase. It is thought that establishment of new shoots from spores germinating
under natural conditions depends on a complex set of factors and may occur
only rarely (e.g. Boatman and Lark, 1971; Miles and Longton, 1990; but see discussion in Sundberg and Rydin, 2002).
Another unknown factor is how easily diaspores can access the agents of dispersal, which might be especially relevant for the isolation in small organisms that
are found in specific microenvironments. Some bryophyte species occupy sheltered microhabitats where wind transport is very unlikely. A good example of this
is the so-called ‘rockhouses’, in the Southern Appalachian Mountains (USA). These
are deep narrow gorges that harbour a remarkably isolated bryoflora with several
endemic mosses and a relatively high number of species that have their closest
relatives in the tropics (Billings and Anderson, 1966; Farrar, 1998). The greatest
concentration of endemism occurs near waterfalls and in sheltered microenvir�
onments where conditions are stable and spore dissemination by wind may be
prevented by the surface tension of water in a permanently wet environment. The
result is a humid and mild refugium for certain bryophytes, isolated from major
air currents.
biogeogr a phy of mosses and allies
11.2.3╇ Disjunct ranges
Up to here, we have looked at insights provided by analyses of continuous ranges.
However, perhaps more than wide ranges and rates of endemism, the paradigmatic examples that summarise the controversy on the relative importance of
the main processes determining species geographic ranges are the disjunctions.
Discontinuous distribution ranges can be interpreted either as the result of fragmentation of ancient continuous distributions or as consequences of long-range
dispersals. Supporting the hypothesis of relict ranges is the fact that most bryophyte disjunct distributions are highly congruent with the continental drift
hypothesis (Schofield and Crum, 1972; Schuster, 1983). Indeed, the bryophyte disjunctions parallel those found in spermatophytes, which suggests that the historic
events that shaped species distribution for flowering plants are also relevant for
bryophytes. Schofield (1988) analysed the disjunctions between Europe and North
America and concluded that the western North American–western European
bryophyte disjunctions have a relict origin. He based his conclusion on inferences
made from the biological and ecological characteristics of the disjunct species.
This kind of analysis gives indirect but consistent results regarding the importance
of past geologic and climatic events in causing the observed disjunct patterns.
If we accept the relict origin of the disjunctions we have to assume that some
species have remained unchanged (at least morphologically) for very long periods
of time. At the population level there is evidence for the ability of bryophytes for
long-term survival. For example, the perennial species Anastrophyllum saxicola is
known for producing extensive populations of clones that likely survived a minimum of 2000 years (Longton and Schuster, 1983). This could indicate that some
species are capable of persisting, even under suboptimal conditions, as living fossils (Hallingbäck, 2002). It is unknown how common these rates of survival are
and, in any case, to assume species stability at a geologic time scale is a very different matter. Although records of old fossils are scarce within bryophytes, there are
a few remarkable examples of morphological stability, and at least some species
have remained unchanged for more than 45 million years (cf. Taylor et al., 2009).
However, to provide evidence for the African–Tropical American or Pangaean distributions, species need to remain without apparent changes for more than 100
and 180 millions of years respectively.
Certain intriguing disjunct distributions that are difficult to interpret under a
historic and geologic perspective provide support for the long-distance dispersal
hypothesis. Perhaps the best examples are the bipolar disjunctions, distributions
that include boreal or temperate regions in both hemispheres but with an absence
from the landmasses in between. There are 18 bryophytes species in Antarctica
that are known to have this type of distribution (Ochyra et al., 2008). In most cases,
species with bipolar disjunctions have a predominantly Holarctic distribution and
217
218
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
a few isolated populations in the southern hemisphere and therefore they probably originated by long-distance dispersal from source populations in the northern hemisphere (Ochyra and Buck, 2003).
In spite of their support for the long-distance dispersal hypothesis, erratic and
unconnected distributions such as bipolar disjunctions are infrequent among
bryophytes. Most species show geographic ranges that are congruent with general
floristic patterns and therefore different biogeographic units (kingdoms, subkingdoms, regions etc.) can be recognised (e.g. Schofield, 1992). The general patterns
of vascular plants and bryophytes are analogous, suggesting that the historical
and biological mechanisms shaping the species distributions are similar in both
groups (Schofield, 1992). Because of the low likelihood of a repetition of a unidirectional stochastic event, it has been argued that the concordant bryofloras are
a proof of the lack of importance of neutral long-dispersal events in shaping species distributions (Schuster, 1983). However, it has been increasingly understood
that wind dispersal is not just a stochastic neutral process. On the contrary, intercontinental dispersal events by wind are considered part of a directional, congruent and consistent process which could give rise to patterns of concordant floras
(McDowall, 2004; Muñoz et al., 2004; Cook and Crisp, 2005), especially in groups
of high dispersal potential such as bryophytes. Despite the latter, the similarity
across floristic realms presents a picture highly concordant with historic connectivity and appears difficult to explain solely by wind connectivity. For example,
Pócs (1998) analysed the phytogeographic affinities of the bryophyte flora of the
Arc Mountains in eastern Africa showing how the old crystalline mountains of this
cordillera host a significantly higher number of Lemurian (Madagascan) elements,
than the neighbouring younger mountains do. Furthermore, even if nowadays the
Eastern Arch is not the closest area to Madagascar, it contains the highest number
of Lemurian bryophytes in continental Africa. This strongly reflects ancient links
between Eastern Africa and Madagascar, two dissected parts of Gondwanaland.
11.2.4╇ Diversity patterns
As we have seen, bryophytes show a wide variety of distribution patterns, from
very extensive to very narrow ranges, including both continuous and disjunct distributions. Bryophyte distributions frequently parallel those of flowering plants,
which suggests that both groups were influenced by the same factors. However,
a detailed analysis of their distribution patterns shows important discrepancies
which could have resulted from the fact that bryophytes are smaller than vascular
plants, that they have a more ancient origin, and/or that they have different modes
of dispersal. In some respects these differences make bryophytes more similar to
other small-sized organisms with passive wind dispersal. We will now focus on
bryophyte diversity patterns to explore whether these are shared with vascular
plants or with microorganisms.
biogeogr a phy of mosses and allies
The latitudinal gradient of species richness has traditionally been thought to be
one of the few general rules in biogeography (Hawkins et al., 2003). The decrease in
species richness towards the poles is consistent across a wide variety of organisms
with high levels of organisation. This latitudinal gradient is lacking in some microorganisms, which has raised doubts about the generality of the pattern. For bryophytes it has repeatedly been stated that the tropics harbour the richest bryofloras
of the world (e.g. Argent, 1979; Frahm et al., 2003). However, recently published
global maps of moss (Mutke and Barthlott, 2005) and liverwort (von Konrat et al.,
2008) species richness do not show unambiguous evidence of such a latitudinal
gradient. Tropical regions in South America are consistently richer in moss species than regions at higher latitudes. This pattern is not so clear in liverworts, and
some countries of tropical Africa show remarkably low species richness for both
mosses and liverworts. Furthermore, in a study of moss species richness in the
tropical Andes, Churchill (2009) suggested that the global pattern of richness in
bryophytes is probably the opposite of that observed in other groups. In his study
he argues that the richest areas of the world are the temperate and boreal forests
of the northern hemisphere. Although the compilation effort made is huge in both
the studies of Mutke and Barthlott (2005) and von Konrat et al. (2008), it is important to note that the information on bryophytes species richness is far from complete, and some of the observed patterns may be flawed by knowledge gaps and
uneven sampling efforts, as already noted by the authors. A good example of this
is that many tropical African countries, such as Guinea Bissau and The Gambia,
still have just one species recorded (O’Shea, 2006). In addition, both Mutke and
Barthlott (2005) and von Konrat et al. (2008) based their overviews on geopolitical
units (countries and states), which clearly oversimplifies the species richness patterns and can produce misleading results (Mutke and Barthlott, 2005).
This problem of too coarse units, as well as the bias caused by gaps in knowledge, could also have influenced the conclusions by Shaw et al. (2005). These
authors published one of the few attempts of statistically quantifying the latitudinal gradient in mosses, and failed to show a strong relationship between species
richness and latitude.
Despite the lack of a general unambiguous pattern in liverworts, the Lejeun�
aceae, one of the largest liverwort families, is clearly most speciose in the tropical
regions of the world (von Konrat et al., 2008). An analysis of beta diversity of pleurocarpous mosses showed a higher species turnover in the tropics than in temperate and boreal regions, indicating the existence of a latitudinal gradient of moss
diversity (Hedenäs, 2007). In addition, the hot spots proposed by Tan and Pócs
(2000) are generally found in the same areas that are traditionally considered to
have a high diversity for vascular plants. At present we must therefore conclude
that it is not yet possible to infer whether bryophytes really lack a latitudinal diversity gradient or if such suggestions are due to incomplete data at the global scale.
219
220
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
The differences in diversity patterns among taxonomic groups can also be
addressed in terms of species–area relationships. Species–area curves are one
of the most frequently cited correlations in geographic ecology. With some
exceptions (e.g. Kimmerer and Driscoll, 2000) bryophytes show a strong relationship between area size and species richness (Tangney et al., 1990; Ingerpuu
et al., 2001; Nakanishi, 2001; Virtanen and Oksanen, 2007). However, the slope
of the curve is supposedly less steep in bryophytes than in vascular plants and
other large organisms (Ingerpuu et al., 2001; Peintinger et al., 2003). Bryophytes
therefore seem to occupy an intermediate position between microorganisms,
for which a species–area relationship is rarely found (Fenchel and Finlay,
2004), and large organisms, where the slope is steeper. These results support
the hypothesis that less steep species–area slopes are found in small organisms
(Drakare et al., 2006) and suggest that the greater dispersal abilities of the latter
(Mouquet and Loreau, 2002; Hovestadt and Poethke, 2005) lead to lower species
turnover and thus to more similar communities across regions. In agreement
with this, Hillebrand et al. (2001) found that the decay in community similarity with distance is slower for small than large organisms, which corroborates
the importance of dispersal ability in small organisms in shaping communities. Bryophytes do not completely fulfil the expectations regarding this tendency. For example, a meta-community analysis by Löbel et al. (2006) showed
a strong spatial aggregation in bryophytes and, more significantly, a study of
spatial structure in communities of mosses and other taxonomic groups demonstrated that the distance decay in similarity for bryophytes was comparable
to that in wind-dispersed vascular plants (Nekola and White, 1999). Although
these results are not conclusive, other works that do not directly address the
structure of communities have also highlighted the aggregated distribution
of bryophytes (Hedenäs et al., 1989; Söderström and Jonsson, 1989; Kuusinen
and Penttinen, 1999). This kind of pattern suggests the existence of similar pro�
cesses shaping communities of vascular plants (where spatial aggregation is a
well-known pattern) and bryophytes.
11.3╇ The phylogeographic approach
In bryology, as in other fields of biology, the use of molecular techniques has
become increasingly common during the last 20 years. These techniques have
especially been applied in phylogenetic studies, but also in taxonomy and biogeography (cf. Shaw et al., 2002; Vanderpoorten and Goffinet, 2009; Heinrichs
et al., 2009a). In many cases molecular analyses have confirmed earlier hypotheses based on morphological data. However, there are also numerous examples
where taxonomical units defined by molecular similarity are incongruent with
biogeogr a phy of mosses and allies
morphologically defined taxa. This has led both to the recognition of cryptic species and to the synonymisation of taxa, and has re-opened the species concept
debate (see e.g. Mishler, 2009 vs. Zander, 2007). In some cases, molecular-based
taxonomic units show clear biogeographic patterns that allow more or less uncontroversial interpretations, but there are also studies in which the biogeographic
history of clades is difficult to assess. There are even cases where contradictory
conclusions can be drawn from similar molecular data sets.
Molecular studies have revealed variation not only between, but also within
morphologically defined bryophyte species (morphospecies). In some cases the
molecular variation within morphologically stable species is even larger than
among morphologically clearly different taxa. This has led to the recognition
of cryptic bryophyte species (see revision in Shaw, 2001, and Heinrichs et al.,
2009a). When morphological studies were carried out after the molecular variation was detected, this has sometimes led to the description of new species (e.g.
Szweykowski et al., 2005; Hedenäs et al., 2009) or to the re-establishment of previously synonymised taxa (e.g. Rycroft et al., 2004; Cano et al., 2005; Hedenäs,
2008; Oguri et al., 2008; Draper and Hedenäs, 2008, 2009). On the contrary, there
are also examples where taxonomically problematic bryophyte morphotypes
were impossible to distinguish on the basis of the studied markers. Therefore
some taxa, both at the infraspecific and specific levels, have been synonymised
based on molecular evidence. This has especially happened for endemic taxa that
were described mostly on the basis of their isolated occurrences (e.g. Heinrichs
et al., 2004a, 2004b; Werner et al., 2009). In spite of all the mentioned taxonomic
changes, the number of described bryophyte species remains approximately
constant. This sharply contrasts with the tendency observed in other groups of
small organisms, where the introduction of molecular techniques has meant a
cut-across classic taxonomy and has multiplied the estimated number of species
up to ten times (e.g. Foissner, 1999). The difference between the two categories
probably lies in that the number of morphological characters available for species
delimitation is much higher in bryophytes than in many other small organisms.
Among microorganisms, the DNA information has revealed a vast molecular
diversity within relatively few morphologically recognised species that are globally distributed (Spratt et al., 2006).
If molecular techniques are useful, although not revolutionary for our understanding of bryophyte taxonomy at the species level, they are more widely used
for understanding bryophyte phylogeny and they have, in many cases, revealed
unsuspected relationships (cf. Renzaglia et al., 2007). Since phylogenetic relationships reflect the evolutionary history, these can also be used to infer dispersal and
colonisation histories at various taxonomic levels. As an example, the geographic
distributions of haplotypes within morphospecies allow us to infer species origins
and/or diversification areas, as well as their dispersal routes.
221
222
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
11.3.1╇ Phylogeography of endemics
Molecular techniques have a great potential to elucidate the geographic history for
both widely and narrowly distributed species, and have often confirmed endemics as distinct taxonomic entities. A nice example of the latter among bryophytes is
found in the genus Echinodium (Stech et al., 2008). This genus was earlier thought to
comprise six species, four restricted to the Macaronesian archipelago and two to the
Australasian and Pacific regions. It has now been demonstrated that this is an artificial group consisting of an endemic Macaronesian genus (Echinodium s.str., three
species), one Macaronesian Isothecium species and two Australasian members possibly in connection with Thamnobryum that show convergent morphological evolution. Stech et al. (2008) not only elucidate the taxonomy and phylogeny of this group
of species, but they also clarify the biogeography of a vicariance that is otherwise
difficult to explain. Studies of molecular variation involving endemic taxa in a phylogenetic framework can also lead to conclusions regarding speciation processes.
Thus, Vanderpoorten and Long (2006) interpreted the nested position of the Azorean
endemic liverwort Leptoscyphus azoricus within populations of the Neotropical L.
porphyrius as an example of recent speciation caused by a long-distance dispersal.
Similarly, Hedderson and Zander (2007) postulated that the South African endemic
moss Triquetrella mxinwana originated during the Pliocene–Pleistocene as a result
of long-distance dispersal, on the basis of low molecular divergence levels and a
chronology consistent with the existence of the niche where it grows.
11.3.2╇ Phylogeography of widely distributed taxa
Haplotype diversity and molecular variation in species distributed throughout
large and more or less continuous areas have been used by several authors to infer
possible areas of origin, glacial refugia and migration routes. Hedenäs and Eldenäs
(2007) hypothesised that the two cryptic species of Hamatocaulis vernicosus complex occurring in Europe diverged before the last periods of glaciations, based on
their occurrence also in America. The species occurring in southern Europe could
have survived somewhere in the northern Mediterranean region, from where it
re-colonised earlier glaciated or periglacial areas in central and northern Europe.
Hedderson and Nowell (2006) deduced that glacial refugia for Homalothecium
sericeum occurred both in southern Europe (Balkan and Italian peninsulas) and
in the British islands and adjacent mainland, on the basis of the greater haplotype diversity and occurrence of unique haplotypes in these areas. As a final
example, Hedenäs (2009a) used molecular data and fossil evidence to postulate a
late Tertiary origin of ancestral haplotypes of Scorpidium cossonii in cold pockets
in a then partly sparsely forest-covered Arctic. Subsequently, haplotypes evolved
adaptations to warmer climates and that allowed colonisation of temperate wetlands and also gave rise to the morphospecies S. scorpioides.
biogeogr a phy of mosses and allies
Analyses of molecular variation among populations have also been used to
address the origin of disjunct distributions. If disjunctions originated as a consequence of recent or repeated and continuing long-distance dispersal events,
we should expect that molecular sequences from separate populations are rather
similar. On the other hand, if an original distribution area was fragmented and
populations remained isolated for a long period thereafter different mutations
should have accumulated in the respective areas. In the latter case molecular
differentiation between populations should be relatively higher (e.g. Shaw et al.,
2002). In bryophyte studies both fragmentation and long-distance dispersal have
been proposed to explain extant species disjunctions. McDaniel and Shaw (2003)
analysed the distribution of different chloroplast haplotypes of the subantarctic
moss Pyrrhobryum mnioides. They found evidence for recent or ongoing migration
across the Tasman Sea but not for intercontinental dispersal between Australasia
and South America or along the Andes between Patagonia and the Neotropics.
From the degree of molecular differentiation, they concluded that Australasian
and South American populations have been isolated for approximately 80 million
years, after the Gondwanan fragmentation. Likewise, Stech and Dohrmann (2004)
found a strong geographic structure in haplotype distribution in the widespread
moss Campylopus pilifer, which they interpreted as a probable result of divergent
evolution of the populations, after the segregation of Gondwana. However, they
also assumed long-range dispersal or introduction events to explain anomalous
positions of some haplotypes that deviate from the general pattern. As a third
example, Heinrichs et al. (2006) suggested that the current distribution of the
liverwort family Plagiochilaceae is the result of the breakup of Gondwana, in combination with short-distance and rare long-distance dispersal events.
Other studies suggest long-distance dispersal to be the main process to explain
disjunct distributions, such as Vanderpoorten et al. (2008), Shaw et al. (2003) and
Werner et al. (2003) for several moss species occurring both in North America and
Europe, and Shaw et al. (2008) for several taxa in Australasia and South America.
For liverworts, long-distance dispersal was proposed to explain especially tropical American–African disjunctions (e.g. Feldberg et al., 2007; Heinrichs et al.,
2009b). Most of these cases exhibit a low degree of molecular differentiation
among populations. As mentioned above, this probably reflects either recent
divergence or repeated and continuing dispersal events. In addition, the molecular dating estimates for some liverworts, such as Marchesinia brachiata, support
an Oligocene (that is, post-Gondwanan) divergence (Heinrichs et al., 2009b). Also
the biogeography of Herbertus cannot be solely explained by Gondwanan divergence (Feldberg et al., 2007), since extremely low mutation rates would need to
be assumed. All these examples except one (cf. Shaw et al., 2003) show some geographic structure in their haplotype distributions, since European, African and
American samples are more closely related within than between continents. Thus,
223
224
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
barriers to gene flow must exist at the continental scale and this probably indicates
that intercontinental gene flow is not necessarily a continuous, repeated and/or
currently ongoing process.
It can now be concluded that disjunct distributions in bryophytes probably ori�
ginated from different processes, and that it is not possible to infer a general pattern
that is valid for all species. In line with the idea that each species has an individual history, it is especially significant that the distributions of congeneric species
are sometimes explained by different processes. Hentschel et al. (2007) found that
the extant distribution patterns of the Porella species P. swartziana, P. cordaeana
and P. platyphylla, are probably a result of long-distance dispersal events. On the
other hand, Freitas and Brehm (2001) concluded that the present distribution of P.
canariensis is the result of a fragmentation of an originally larger continuous area,
and they interpreted the geographic structure of the studied haplotypes as indicating a lack of present-day gene flow among regions.
In some cases, similar data on a single species can be interpreted in conflicting
ways. Based on the demonstrated low capacity for long-distance dispersal of spores
in the moss Lopidium concinnum (van Zanten, 1978), Frey et al. (1999) interpreted
the molecular similarity among populations from New Zealand, Brazil and Chile
as indicating a Gondwanan origin and slight molecular divergence and speciation
in geological times (stenoevolution). McDaniel and Shaw (2003) and Shaw et al.
(2008) considered that a Gondwanan origin for this moss would imply unacceptable rates for chloroplast sequences evolution, and that recent or ongoing dispersal is a more likely explanation for the species’ present distribution. Whether one
or the other interpretation is more plausible could be approached by dating the
molecular phylogenies. Although this method, if used properly, can be extremely
useful, it is sometimes difficult to assess divergence times precisely (Cook and
Crisp, 2005; Heads, 2005). For bryophytes the fossil record is relatively incomplete
compared with the situation for some other organisms and only a few such studies therefore exist for this group. The problems can be illustrated by the survey on
Plagiochila by Heinrichs et al. (2006), who used a single fossil specimen to date
their phylogeny. Since the specimen could not be unequivocally assigned to a single node, they explored several possible scenarios to minimise the effect of incorrect assignments and concluded that resolving the diversification time-frame is
critical to understand the historical biogeography of their study group. Another
example that shows how the dating of phylogenies is decisive for unravelling biogeographic patterns is that of Huttunen et al. (2008). Their phylogeny recovered for
the moss genus Homalothecium shows a strong phylogeographic signal that suggested two main lineages, one including only American species and the other one
with Western–Palaearctic species. Such a strong geographic structure is usually
interpreted as indicating lack of long-distance dispersal events. The authors estimated the divergence time for the two lineages by using absolute rates of molecular
biogeogr a phy of mosses and allies
evolution from the literature and factoring uncertainties around those estimates
using probabilistic calibration priors. The different scenarios that could be reconstructed from their dating suggested that the a priori probable Laurasian origin
would involve unsustainable nucleotide substitution rates and they therefore suggested that the present distribution is instead a result of transoceanic long-distance dispersal. A similar conclusion was reached by Devos and Vanderpoorten
(2009) to explain the present distribution of the liverwort genus Leptoscyphus,
also based on different calibration points depending on several assumptions.
These dated phylogenies suggest that long-distance dispersal did probably play
an important role in shaping the distribution patterns of some bryophyte species
or lineages. However, one should not forget that when such species or haplotypes
show clear geographic structures, this only indicates that dispersal between the
areas occurred at a certain more or less remote moment in time.
Finally, it should also be considered that in bryophytes the study of different
gene regions has sometimes led to incongruent phylogenetic topologies. As was
already discussed by Hedenäs (2009b) this should be taken into account, since
molecular phylogenies based on too few specimens per taxon may not reflect the
actual complexity and can lead to misleading conclusions. Moreover, the biogeographic patterns inferred by different analysis techniques or different molecular
markers can be completely divergent. Even when molecular techniques provide
much interesting and valuable information on bryophyte biogeography, care and
further work are needed before more definitive conclusions are possible.
11.4╇ Concluding remarks
As a summary of the numerous studies published, some main conclusions
arise:€several distribution patterns are found among the bryophytes, and different
processes can explain each of them. Long-distance dispersal by wind has apparently played a chief role in at least some cases, whereas most of the known distribution patterns are better explained if other mechanisms, such as continental
drift, stepping-stone migration and dispersal by anthropogenic or other agents,
are also taken into account.
Bryophytes are an ancient group of land plants and have had time enough to
reach a very high level of diversification. They are remarkably heterogeneous
from many points of view, such as structurally, physiologically and ecologically.
Allorge (1947) stated that among mosses and allies, as well as in most plants, species greatly differ in their ecological amplitude; the same can be said about their
dispersal capacity and their evolutionary potential.
Given the complexity of the matter in hand, it seems that not a single hypothesis will be enough to explain the intricacy of the observed patterns. Biogeography
225
226
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
of bryophytes more likely depends on a complex set of interacting phenomena,
including both long-distance dispersal and effective stepping-stone propagation
acting across long periods of time.
Finally, bryophytes are small plants and their distribution areas are in general
larger than those of flowering plants. Still, the distribution patterns of species
belonging to both groups are to a high degree the result of similar processes.
References
Allorge, P. (1947). Essai de bryogéographie
de la péninsule Ibérique. Enciclopédie
Biogéographique et Écologique. Paris:€
P. Lechevalier.
Argent, G.C.G. (1979). Systematics of
tropical mosses. In Clarke, G., Duckett,
J. (eds.), Bryophyte Systematics,
pp. 185–194. London:€Academic Press.
Baas Becking, L.G.M. (1934).
Geobiologie€of€inleiding tot de
milieukunde. The€Hague:€Van Stockum
and Zoon.
Billings, W.D., Anderson, L.E. (1966).
Some microclimatic characteristics
of habitats of endemic and disjunct
bryophytes in the southern Blue Ridge.
The Bryologist 69, 76–95.
Boatman, D.J., Lark, P.M. (1971). Inorganic
nutrition of the protonemata of
Sphagnum papillosum Lindb.,
S. magellanicum Brid. and S. cuspidatum
Ehrh. New Phytologist 70, 1053–1059.
Cano, M.J., Werner, O., Guerra, J. (2005). A
morphometric and molecular study in
Tortula subulata complex (Pottiaceae,
Bryophyta). Botanical Journal of the
Linnean Society 149, 333–350.
Churchill, S.P. (2009). Moss diversity
and endemism of the tropical Andes
1. Annals of the Missouri Botanical
Garden 96, 434–449.
Cook, L.G., Crisp, M.D. (2005). Directional
asymmetry of long-distance dispersal
and colonization could mislead
reconstructions of biogeography.
Journal of Biogeography 32, 741–754.
Crum, H.A., Anderson, L.E. (1981).
Mosses€of Eastern North America,
Vol.€1. New York, NY:€Columbia
University Press.
Devos, N., Vanderpoorten, A. (2009).
Range disjunctions, speciation, and
morphological transformation rates
in the liverwort genus Leptoscyphus.
Evolution 63, 779–792.
Dierssen, K. (2001). Distribution,
ecological amplitude and
phytosociological characterization of
European bryophytes. Bryophytorum
Bibliotheca 56, 1–289.
Drakare, S., Lennon, J.J., Hillebrand,
H. (2006). The imprint of the
geographical, evolutionary and
ecological context on species-area
relationships. Ecology Letters 9,
215–227.
Draper, I., Hedenäs, L. (2008).
Sciuro-hypnum tromsoeense (Kaurin
& Arnell) Draper & Hedenäs, a distinct
species from the European mountains.
Journal of Bryology 30, 271–278.
Draper, I., Hedenäs, L. (2009).
Sciuro-hypnum dovrense (Limpr.)
Draper & Hedenäs comb. nov., a
distinct Eurasian alpine species.
Cryptogamie, Bryologie 30, 289–299.
Engel, J.J., Glenny, D. (2008). A Flora
of the Liverworts and Hornworts of
biogeogr a phy of mosses and allies
New Zealand, Vol. 1. Monographs
in Systematic Botany from the
Missouri Botanical Garden. St Louis,
MI:€Missouri Botanical Garden.
Farrar, D.R. (1998). The tropical flora of
rockhouse cliff formations in the
eastern United States. Journal of
the€Torrey Botanical Society 125,
91–108.
Feldberg, K., Hentschel, J., Wilson, R. et€al.
(2007). Phylogenetic biogeography
of the leafy liverwort Herbertus
(Jungermanniales, Herbertaceae)
based on nuclear and chloroplast DNA
sequence data:€correlation between
genetic variation and geographical
distribution. Journal of Biogeography
34, 688–698.
Fenchel, T., Finlay, B.J. (2004). The
ubiquity of small species:€patterns of
local and global diversity. Bioscience
54, 777–784.
Fife, A.J. (1995). Checklist of the mosses
of New Zealand. The Bryologist 98,
313–337.
Foissner, W. (1999). Protist diversity:
estimates of the near-imponderable.
Protist 150, 363–368.
Frahm, J.-P. (2008). Diversity, dispersal and
biogeography of bryophytes (mosses).
Biodiversity and Conservation 17,
277–284.
Frahm, J.-P., O’Shea, B., Pócs, T. et al.
(2003). Manual of tropical bryology.
Tropical Bryology 23, 5–194.
Freitas, H., Brehm, A. (2001). Genetic
diversity of the Macaronesian
leafy€liverwort Porella canariensis
inferred from RAPD markers. The
American Genetic Association 92,
339–345.
Frey, W. (ed.). (2009). Syllabus of
Plant Families, Vol. 3. Bryophytes
and Seedless Vascular Plants.
Berlin:€Borntraeger.
Frey, W., Stech, M., Meissner, K. (1999).
Chloroplast DNA-relationship in
palaeoaustral Lopidium concinnum
(Hypopterygiaceae, Musci). An
example of stenoevolution in mosses.
Studies in austral temperate rain forest
bryophytes 2. Plant Systematics and
Evolution 218, 67–75.
Frey, W., Frahm, J.-P., Fischer, E., Lobin, W.
(2006). The Liverworts, Mosses and
Ferns of Europe. Colchester:€Harley
Books.
Furuki, T., Dalton, P.J. (2008).
Vandiemenia ratkowskiana Hewson
(Marchantiophyta):€a revised
description and reassessment of its
taxonomic status. Journal of Bryology
30, 48–54.
Gignac, L.D. (2001). Bryophytes as
indicators of climate change. The
Bryologist 104, 410–420.
Glime, J.M. (2007). Bryophyte Ecology,
Vol. 1. Physiological Ecology. EBook
sponsored by Michigan Technological
University and the International
Association of Bryologists. Accessed
October 2009 at www.bryoecol.mtu.
edu.
Goffinet, B., Shaw, A.J. (eds.).
(2009). Bryophyte Biology.
Cambridge:€Cambridge University
Press.
González-Mancebo, J.M., Romaguera,
F., Ros, R.M., Patiño, J., Werner, O.
(2008). Bryophyte flora of the Canary
Islands:€an updated compilation
of the species list with an analysis
of distribution patterns in the
context of the Macaronesian Region.
Cryptogamie, Bryologie 29, 315–357.
Grolle, R., Long, D.G. (2000). An
annotated check-list of the Hepaticae
and Anthocerotae of Europe and
Macaronesia. Journal of Bryology 22,
103–140.
227
228
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Hallingbäck, T. (2002). Globally
widespread bryophytes, but rare in
Europe. Portugaliae Acta Biologica 20,
11–24.
Hawkins, B.A., Porter, E.E., Felizola DinizFilho, J.A. (2003). Productivity and
history as predictors of the latitudinal
diversity gradient of terrestrial birds.
Ecology 84, 1608–1623.
Heads, M. (2005). Dating nodes on
molecular phylogenies:€a critique of
molecular biogeography. Cladistics 21,
62–78.
Hedderson, T.A., Nowell, T.L. (2006).
Phylogeography of Homalothecium
sericeum (Hedw.) Br. Eur.; toward a
reconstruction of glacial survival
and postglacial migration. Journal of
Bryology 28, 283–292.
Hedderson, T.A., Zander, R.H. (2007).
Triquetrella mxinwana, a new moss
species from South Africa, with a
phylogenetic and biogeographic
hypothesis for the genus. Journal of
Bryology 29, 151–160.
Hedenäs, L. (2007). Global diversity
patterns among pleurocarpous
mosses. The Bryologist 110, 319–331.
Hedenäs, L. (2008). Molecular variation
and speciation in Antitrichia
curtipendula s.l. (Leucodontaceae,
Bryophyta). Botanical Journal of the
Linnean Society 156, 341–354.
Hedenäs, L. (2009a). Relationships among
arctic and non-arctic haplotypes
of the moss species Scorpidium
cossonii and Scorpidium scorpioides
(Calliergonaceae). Plant Systematics
and Evolution 277, 217–231.
Hedenäs, L. (2009b). Haplotype
variation of relevance to global
and European phylogeography
in Sarmentypnum exannulatum
(Bryophyta:€Calliergonaceae). Journal
of Bryology 31, 145–158.
Hedenäs, L., Herben, T., Rydin, H.,
Söderström, L. (1989). Ecology of the
invading moss species Orthodontium
lineare in Sweden:€Spatial distribution
and population structure. Holarctic
Ecology 12, 163–172.
Hedenäs, L., Eldenäs, P. (2007). Cryptic
speciation, habitat differentiation, and
geography in Hamatocaulis vernicosus
(Calliergonaceae, Bryophyta). Plant
Systematics and Evolution 268,
131–145.
Hedenäs, L., Huttunen, S., Shevock, J.R.,
Norris, D.H. (2009). Homalothecium
californicum (Brachytheciaceae), a
new endemic species to the California
Floristic Province, Pacific Coast of
North America. The Bryologist 112,
593–604.
Heinrichs, J., Groth, H., Lindner, M.,
Feldberg, K., Rycroft, D.S. (2004a).
Molecular, morphological, and
phytochemical evidence for a broad
species concept of Plagiochila bifaria
(Hepaticae). The Bryologist 107, 28–40.
Heinrichs, J., Groth, H., Lindner, M.
et al. (2004b). Intercontinental
distribution of Plagiochila corrugata
(Plagiochilaceae, Hepaticae) inferred
from nrDNA ITS sequences and
morphology. Botanical Journal of the
Linnean Society 146, 469–481.
Heinrichs, J., Lindner, M., Groth, H.
et al. (2006). Goodbye or welcome
Gondwana?€– insights into the
phylogenetic biogeography of the
leafy liverwort Plagiochila with a
description of Proskauera, gen. nov.
(Plagiochilaceae, Jungermanniales).
Plant Systematics and Evolution 258,
227–250.
Heinrichs, J., Hentschel, J., Feldberg, K.,
Bombosch, A., Schneider, H. (2009a).
Phylogenetic biogeography and
taxonomy of disjunctly distributed
biogeogr a phy of mosses and allies
bryophytes. Journal of Systematics and
Evolution 47, 497–508.
Heinrichs, J., Klugmann, F., Hentschel, J.,
Schneider, H. (2009b). DNA taxonomy,
cryptic speciation and diversification
of the Neotropical-African liverwort,
Marchesinia brachiata (Lejeuneaceae,
Porellales). Molecular Phylogenetics and
Evolution 53, 113–121.
Hentschel, J., Zhu, R.-L., Long, D.G.
et al. (2007). A phylogeny of Porella
(Porellaceae, Jungermanniopsida)
based on nuclear and chloroplast DNA
sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics
and Evolution 45, 693–705.
Hill, M.O., Bell, N., Bruggeman-Nannenga,
M.A. et al. (2006). An annotated
checklist of the mosses of Europe and
Macaronesia. Journal of Bryology 28,
198–267.
Hillebrand, H., Watermann, F., Karez, R.,
Berninger, U.G. (2001). Differences
in species richness patterns between
unicellular and multicellular
organisms. Oecologia 126, 114–124.
Hovestadt, T., Poethke, H.J. (2005).
Dispersal and establishment:€spatial
patterns and species–area
relationships. Diversity and
Distributions 11, 333–340.
Huttunen, S., Hedenäs, L., Ignatov,
M.S., Devos, N., Vanderpoorten, A.
(2008). Origin and evolution of the
northern hemisphere disjunction
in the moss genus Homalothecium
(Brachytheciaceae). American Journal
of Botany 95, 720–730.
Ingerpuu, N., Vellak, K., Kukk, T.,
Pärtel,€M. (2001). Bryophyte and
vascular plant species richness in
boreo-nemoral moist forests and
mires. Biodiversity and Conservation
10, 2153–2166.
Kimmerer, R.W., Driscoll, M.J.L. (2000).
Bryophyte species richness on insular
boulder habitats:€t he effect of area,
isolation, and microsite diversity. The
Bryologist 103, 748–756.
Kuusinen, M., Penttinen, A. (1999). Spatial
pattern of the threatened epiphytic
bryophyte Neckera pennata at two
scales in a fragmented boreal forest.
Ecography 22, 729–735.
Lara, F., Garilleti, R., Mazimpaka, V.
(2003). Noticias sobre el estado
de Orthotrichum handiense en
Fuerteventura (Islas Canarias). Boletín
de la Sociedad Española de Briología
22–23, 11–16.
Limpens, J., Berendse, F., Blodau, C.
et al. (2008). Peatlands and the
carbon cycle:€from local processes
to global implications€– a synthesis.
Biogeosciences 5, 1475–1491.
Longton, R.E., Schuster, R.M. (1983).
Reproductive biology. In Schuster,
R.M. (ed.), New Manual of Bryology,
pp. 386–462. Nichinan:€Hattori
Botanical Laboratory.
Löbel, S., Snäll, T., Rydin, H. (2006).
Metapopulation processes in
epiphytes inferred patterns of regional
distribution and local abundance
fragmented forest landscapes. Ecology
94, 856–868.
Machado, A. (2002). La biodiversidad de
las islas Canarias. In Pineda, F.D.,
Miguel, J.M., Casado, M.A., Montalvo,
J. (eds.), La diversidad biológica de
España, pp. 89–100. Madrid:€Pearson
Educación S.A.
Marino, P., Raguso, R., Goffinet, B.
(2009). The ecology and evolution
of fly-dispersed dung mosses
(Splachnaceae):€manipulating insect
behavior through odour and visual
cues. Symbiosis 47, 61–76.
McDaniel, S.F., Shaw, A.J. (2003).
Phylogeographic structure and cryptic
speciation in the Trans-Antarctic moss
229
230
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Pyrrhobryum mnioides. Evolution 57,
205–215.
McDowall, R.W. (2004). What
biogeography is:€a place for process.
Journal of Biogeography 31, 345–351.
Miles, C.J., Longton, R.E. (1990). The role
of spores in reproduction in mosses.
Biological Journal of the Linnean
Society 104, 149–173.
Mishler, B. (2009). Species are not uniquely
real biological entities. In Ayala, F.,
Arp, R . (eds.), Contemporary Debates
in Philosophy of Biology, pp. 110–122.
Chichester:€Wiley-Blackwell.
Morat, P. (1993). Our knowledge of the
flora of New Caledonia:€endemism and
diversity in relation to vegetation types
and substrates. Biodiversity Letters 1,
72–81.
Mouquet, N., Loreau, M. (2002).
Coexistence in metacommunities:€the
regional similarity hypothesis.
American Naturalist 159, 420–426.
Muñoz, J., Felicísimo, A.M., Cabezas,€F.,
Burgaz, A.R., Martínez, I. (2004).
Wind as a long-distance dispersal
vehicle in the southern hemisphere.
Science 304, 1144–1147.
Mutke, J., Barthlott, W. (2005). Patterns of
vascular plant diversity at continental
to global scales. Biologiske Skrifter 55,
521–537.
Nakanishi, K. (2001). Floristic diversity
of bryophyte vegetation in relation
to island area. Journal of Hattori
Botanical Laboratory 91, 301–316.
Nekola, J.C., White, P.S. (1999). Special
Paper:€The distance decay of similarity
in biogeography and ecology. Journal
of Biogeography 26, 867–878.
O’Shea, B.J. (2006). Checklist of the mosses
of sub-Saharan Africa (version 5,
12/06). Tropical Bryology Research
Reports 6, 1–252.
Ochyra, R., Buck, W.R. (2003). Arctoa
fulvella, new to Tierra del Fuego, with
notes on trans-American bipolar
bryogeography. The Bryologist 106,
532–538.
Ochyra, R., Smith, R.L., Bednarek-Ochyra,
H. (2008). Illustrated Moss Flora of
Antarctica. Cambridge:€Cambridge
University Press.
Oguri, E., Yamaguchi, T., Shimamura,€M.,
Tsubota, H., Deguchi, H. (2008).
Phylogenetic and morphological
reevaluation of Leucobryum boninense
(Leucobryaceae), endemic to the Bonin
Islands. The Bryologist 111, 260–270.
Oliver, M.J., Velten, J., Mishler, B.D. (2005).
Desiccation tolerance in bryophytes:€a
reflection of the primitive strategy for
plant survival in dehydrating habitats?
Integrative and Comparative Biology
45, 788–799.
Peintinger, M., Bergamini, A., Schmid, B.
(2003). Species-area relationships and
nestedness of four taxonomic groups
in fragmented wetlands. Basic and
Applied Ecology 4, 385–394.
Pócs, T. (1998). Bryophyte diversity along
the Eastern Arc. Journal of East African
Natural History 87, 75–84.
Porley, R., Hodgetts, N. (2005). Mosses and
Liverworts. London:€HarperCollins.
Proctor, M.C.F. (2009). Physiological
ecology. In Shaw, A., Goffinet, B. (eds.),
Bryophyte Biology (2nd edition),
pp. 237–268. Cambridge:€Cambridge
University Press.
Pugnaire, F.I. , Valladares, F. (eds.). (2007).
Functional Plant Ecology (2nd edition).
New€York, NY:€Taylor & Francis Group.
Renzaglia, K.S., Schuette, S., Duff,
R.J. et al. (2007). Bryophyte
phylogeny:€advancing the molecular
and morphological frontiers. The
Bryologist 110, 179–213.
biogeogr a phy of mosses and allies
Rice, S.K., Collins, D., Anderson, A.M.
(2001). Functional significance
of variation in bryophyte canopy
structure. American Journal of Botany
88, 1568–1576.
Rycroft, D.S., Groth, H., Heinrichs,€J.
(2004). Reinstatement of
Plagiochila maderensis
(Jungermanniopsida:€Plagiochilaceae)
based on chemical evidence and
nrDNA ITS sequences. Journal of
Bryology 26, 37–45.
Sáinz Ollero, H., Moreno Saiz, J.C. (2002).
Flora vascular endémica española.
In Pineda, F., Miguel, J., Casado,€M.,
Montalvo, J. (eds.), Diversidad
biológica de España, pp. 175–196.
Madrid:€Pearson Educación S.A.
Schofield, W.B. (1988). Bryophyte
disjunctions in the northern
hemisphere:€Europe and North
America. Biological Journal of the
Linnean Society 98, 211–224.
Schofield, W.B. (1992). Bryophyte
distribution patterns. In Bates, J.,
Farmer, A. (eds.), Bryophytes and
Lichens in a Changing Environment,
pp. 103–130. Oxford:€Oxford University
Press.
Schofield, W.B., Crum, H.A. (1972).
Disjunctions in bryophytes. Annals
of the Missouri Botanical Garden 59,
174–202.
Schuster, R.M. (1983). Phytogeography
of the bryophyta. In Schuster, R.M.
(ed.), New Manual of Bryology, Vol. 1,
pp. 463–623. Nichinan:€The Hattori
Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan.
Shaw, A.J. (2001). Biogeographic patterns
and cryptic speciation in bryophytes.
Journal of Biogeography 28, 253–261.
Shaw, A.J., Goffinet, B. (2000). Bryophyte
Biology. Cambridge:€Cambridge
University Press.
Shaw, A.J., McDaniel, S.F., Werner, O.,
Ros, R.M. (2002). New frontiers in
bryology and lichenology (invited
essay). Phylogeography and
phylodemography. The Bryologist 105,
373–383.
Shaw, A.J., Werner, O., Ros, R.M. (2003).
Intercontinental mediterranean
disjunct mosses:€morphological and
molecular patterns. American Journal
of Botany 90, 540–550.
Shaw, A.J., Cox, C.J., Goffinet, B.
(2005). Global patterns of moss
diversity:€taxonomic and molecular
inferences. Taxon 54, 337–352.
Shaw, A.J., Holz, I., Cox, C.J., Goffinet, B.
(2008). Phylogeny, character evolution,
and biogeography of the Gondwanic
moss family Hypopterygiaceae
(Bryophyta). Systematic Botany 33,
21–30.
Smith, A.J.E. (2004). The Moss
Flora of Britain and Ireland.
Cambridge:€Cambridge University
Press.
Sotiaux, A., Enroth, J., Olsson, S., Quandt,
D., Vanderpoorten, A. (2009). When
morphology and molecules tell us
different stories:€a case-in-point with
Leptodon corsicus, a new and unique
endemic moss species from Corsica.
Journal of Bryology 31, 186–196.
Spratt, B.G., Staley, J.T., Fisher, M.C. (2006).
Introduction:€species and speciation
in micro-organisms. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society B 365,
1897–1898.
Staples, G.W., Imada, C.T. (2006). Checklist
of Hawaiian anthocerotes and
hepatics. Tropical Bryology 28, 15–47.
Staples, G.W., Imada, C.T., Hoe, W.J.,
Smith, C.W. (2004). A revised checklist
of Hawaiian mosses. Tropical Bryology
25, 35–69.
231
232
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Stech, M., Dohrmann, J. (2004). Molecular
relationships and biogeography of two
Gondwanan Campylopus species,
C. pilifer and C. introflexus
(Dicranaceae). Monographs in
Systematic Botany 98, 415–432.
Stech, M., Sim-Sim, M., Esquível, M.G.
et al. (2008). Explaining the ‘anomalous’
distribution of Echinodium (Bryopsida:
Echinodiaceae):€independent evolution
in Macaronesia and Australasia.
Organisms, Diversity and Evolution 8,
282–292.
Sundberg, S., Rydin, H. (2002). Habitat
requirements for establishment of
Sphagnum from spores. Journal of
Ecology 90, 268–278.
Szweykowski, J., Buczkowska, K.,
Odrzykoski, I.J. (2005). Conocephalum
salebrosum (Marchantiopsida,
Conocephalaceae)€– a new Holarctic
liverwort species. Plant Systematics
and Evolution 253, 133–158.
Söderström, L., Jonsson, B.G. (1989).
Spatial pattern and dispersal in the
leafy hepatic Ptilidium pulcherrimum.
Journal of Bryology 15, 793–802.
Tan, B., Pócs, T. (2000). Biogeography
and conservation of bryophytes.
In Shaw, A. J., Goffinet, B. (eds.),
Biology of Bryophytes, pp. 403–448.
Cambridge:€Cambridge University Press.
Tangney, R.S., Wilson, J.B., Mark,
A.F. (1990). Bryophyte island
biogeography:€a study in Lake
Manapouri, New Zealand. Oikos 59,
21–26.
Taylor, T.N., Taylor, E.L., Krings, M.
(2009). Paleobotany:€The Biology and
Evolution of Fossil Plants. New York,
NY:€Academic Press.
van Zanten, B.O. (1978). Experimental
studies on transoceanic long-range
dispersal of moss spores in the
southern hemisphere. Journal of
Hattori Botanical Laboratory 44,
455–482.
van Zanten, B.O., Pócs, T. 1981.
Distribution and dispersal of
bryophytes. Advances in Bryology 1,
479–562.
van Zanten, B.O., Gradstein, S.R. (1988).
Experimental dispersal geography of
neotropical liverworts. Beihefte zur
Nova Hedwigia 90, 41–94.
Vanderpoorten, A., Goffinet, B.
(2009). Introduction to Bryophytes.
Cambridge:€Cambridge University
Press.
Vanderpoorten, A., Long, D.G. (2006).
Budding speciation and neotropical
origin of the Azorean endemic
liverwort, Leptoscyphus azoricus.
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
40, 73–83.
Vanderpoorten, A., Devos, N., Goffinet,€B.,
Hardy, O.J., Shaw, A.J. (2008). The
barriers to oceanic island radiation
in bryophytes:€insights from the
phylogeography of the moss Grimmia
montana. Journal of Biogeography 35,
654–663.
Virtanen, R., Oksanen, J. (2007). The effects
of habitat connectivity on cryptogam
richness in boulder metacommunity.
Biological Conservation 135, 415–422.
von Konrat, M., Hagborg, A., Söderström,
L. et al. (2008). Early land plants
today:€Global patterns of liverwort
diversity, distribution, and floristic
knowledge. In Mohamed, H., Baki, B.,
Nasrulaq-Boyce, A., Lee, P.K.Y. (eds.),
Bryology in the New Millennium,
pp. 425–438. Kuala Lumpur:€University
of Malaya.
Werner, O., Ros, R.M., Guerra, J., Shaw,
A.J. (2003). Molecular data confirm
the presence of Anacolia menziesii
(Bartramiaceae, Musci) in southern
Europe and its separation from
biogeogr a phy of mosses and allies
Anacolia webbii. Systematic Botany 28,
483–489.
Werner, O., Patiño, J., González€–
Mancebo, J.M., Gabriel, R.M.A., Ros,
R.M. (2009). The taxonomic status and
the geographical relationships of the
Macaronesian endemic moss Fissidens
luisieri (Fissidentaceae) based on DNA
sequence data. The Bryologist 112,
315–324.
Zander, R.H. (2007). When biodiversity
study and systematics diverge.
Biodiversity 8, 43–48.
233
12
Dispersal limitation or habitat quality€–
what shapes the distribution ranges of
ferns?
Hanno Schaefer
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Imperial College London,
Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, UK; and Organismic and Evolutionary Biology,
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
12.1╇ Introduction
Ferns are the second largest vascular plant group on earth with more than 9000
living species currently placed in four classes:€ (1) whisk ferns€ – Psilotopsida,
c. 92 species, (2) horsetails€ – Equisetopsida, c. 15 species, (3) marattioid ferns€ –
Marattiopsida, c. 150 species, and (4) leptosporangiate ferns€ – Polypodiopsida,
c. 9000 species (Smith et al., 2006). Their origin dates back to the Late Devonian
or early Carboniferous more than 350 million years ago (Pryer et al., 2004). They
reproduce by haploid spores, which grow into a free-living gametophyte, usually
a photosynthetic prothallus with microscopic male and female organs. The male
sexual organs, the anteridia, release mobile sperms that swim to the female sexual organs, the archegonia (often on the same prothallus), and fertilise an egg that
remains attached to the prothallus. The resulting zygotes divide by mitoses and
grow into the diploid sporophytes, usually with characteristic rhizome and fronds
Biogeography of Microscopic Organisms: Is Everything Small Everywhere?, ed. Diego Fontaneto.
Published by Cambridge University Press. © The Systematics Association 2011.
w h at s h a p e s t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n r a n g e s o f f e r n s ?
(Lloyd, 1974). Most of the ferns are perennial hemicryptophytes (less commonly
tree ferns, rarely annuals) that produce up to millions of tiny, long-lived, mostly
wind-dispersed spores every year (Smith et al., 2006). The notable exceptions are
some genera of Polypodiaceae (e.g. Grammitis, Jungermannia), which produce relatively few, chlorophyllous spores per frond that live only days or weeks (Schaefer,
2001a) and some water- or bird-dispersed heterosporous ferns (Marsileaceae,
Salviniaceae). Chlorophyllous spores are thought to be less well adapted to longdistance dispersal (Lloyd and Klekowski, 1970) but this might be compensated in
some groups of tropical epiphytic ferns by the production of gametophytic gemmae (Dassler and Farrar, 2001). In contrast to flowering plants, ferns do not depend
on pollinators and are rarely attacked by herbivores (Barrington, 1993).
Among pteridologists, the hypothesis ‘Everything is everywhere, but the environment selects’ (Baas Becking 1934), which was originally developed for microbial
organisms with latent life stages, was entertained especially by Tryon (e.g. Tryon,
1970, 1972, 1985). He thought that most ferns’ enormous dispersal ability should
allow them to colonise almost any suitable habitat. And indeed, most fern families
have a worldwide distribution (Smith et al., 2006) and managed to colonise even
isolated archipelagos like Hawai’i and the Azores multiple times (Geiger et al., 2007;
Schaefer, 2001b). Apparently, Tryon never explicitly referred to Baas Becking but
he stated that ‘studies of fern geography can largely eliminate dispersal capacity
as a variable, or as a limiting factor, and attention can be focused on other aspects
of geographic and evolutionary processes’ (Tryon, 1972), which corresponds very
well to the original hypothesis. However, there is still a debate among pteridologists as to whether dispersal or habitat are more important in shaping the ranges
of ferns (e.g. Barrington, 1993; Kato, 1993; Wolf et al., 2001; Haufler, 2007).
Spore sizes in ferns are in general so small (<â•›60â•›μm) that unlimited wind dispersal
seems plausible (Tryon, 1970). However, recent studies have shown that the idea of
relatively unlimited dispersal for ferns might be too simple:€Gradstein and van Zanten
(1999) tested spores of ferns that had been attached to passenger aeroplanes to find out
if high-altitude wind currents are a safe way of spore dispersal. They found evidence for
UV damage in most species, so strong high-altitude air currents might be effective to
transport spores over long distances but the spores lose the ability to germinate. Even
more important, research of the past few decades has produced strong evidence that
similar to spermatophytes, in many (most?) fern species more than one germinating
fern spore is required to avoid inbreeding problems (Schneller, 1988; Schneller et al.,
1990; Haufler, 2007). Intragametophytic selfing (fusion of sperm and egg from a single gametophyte), intergametophytic selfing (fusion of sperm and egg from different
gametophytes, which are products of the same sporophyte€– analogous to inbreeding
in angiosperms), and intergametophytic crossing (fusion of sperm and egg from different gametophytes, each produced by a different sporophyte) (Lloyd, 1974) were shown
to produce significantly different results in laboratory studies (e.g. Schneller, 1988).
235
236
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Intragametophytic selfing is the only mechanism that would allow establishment of
a new population after a single-spore colonisation event. This has been postulated for
some species (e.g. Vogel et al., 1999) but is thought to be an exception, especially among
diploid taxa (Trewick et al., 2002). These breeding system constraints led to the conclusion that selfing ability might be one of the key limitations in the establishment of new
fern populations following dispersal events (Flinn, 2006; Wolf et al., 2001).
A comprehensive analysis of fern phylogenies, distribution ranges and available habitats is therefore needed to find out what shaped the modern ranges of our
ferns. Here, we (1) summarise published studies that went in this direction and (2)
combine these results with data of the fern flora of the isolated Azores archipelago,
which is an ideal study system to test dispersal limitations.
12.2╇ Evidence from modern fern phylogenies and
chorological analyses
Extant fern lineages differ considerably in age:€ while most of the lineages had
diversified already in the Late Cretaceous, the diversification of one of the biggest
families, the Polypodiaceae, took place in the Eocene, some 40 million years ago
(Schneider et al., 2004; Schuettpelz and Pryer, 2009). Yet, a comparison of the distribution ranges of all 37 currently accepted (and mostly monophyletic) fern families
shows that regardless of age, most of them are pantropical or even subcosmopol�
itan (Smith et al., 2006). Rare exceptions are the Thyrsopteridaceae (endemic to
the Juan-Fernandez archipelago) and the exclusively Asian Dipteridaceae (Smith
et al., 2006) but the former are monotypic and the latter were more widespread
in Mesozoic times (Skog, 2001). Even many genera, and some species (or species
groups) like bracken, Pteridium aquilinum, seem to have extremely broad distribution ranges compared to angiosperms (Smith, 1972).
However, even though they share most families and many genera of ferns, the
regional species pools of the Asian, African and American continent are clearly distinct:€in one of the relatively few phylogeny-based analyses available so far, Janssen
et al. (2007) found that the Asian and Neotropical Polypodiaceae have few common
elements but the African Polypodiaceae (and maybe also some other African fern
groups) are a mix of Neotropical and Asian lineages that colonised the African continent in different time windows. Little and Barrington (2003) found in their analysis of
the pantropical genus Polystichum (with about 200 accepted species) clearly distinct
clades on the American, African and Asian continents. A species group that based on
morphology had been thought to occur in the West Indies and East Asia turned out to
represent in fact two independent lineages with some convergent adaptations.
The hypothesis that all fern species can be found everywhere is also challenged
by detailed analyses of regional fern floras:€ it turns out that many species are
w h at s h a p e s t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n r a n g e s o f f e r n s ?
widespread, but rare and confined to few populations with only small numbers
of individuals (e.g. many European Asplenium species), others are confined to
‘endemic centres’ that are explained by geographic isolation (Barrington, 1993).
Furthermore, disjunctions are common at the regional scale. Whether they are a
result of habitat structure with specialist ferns restricted to rare soil or rock types
or a result of dispersal limitations is often hard to decide. In a recent study, Wild
and Gagnon (2005) analysed the distribution of three rare ferns in Canada and
found no evidence for habitat limitations:€a big proportion of suitable habitat was
not colonised by the study species. The most likely explanation seems to be dispersal limitation. In contrast, an analysis of the fern flora of Japan (Guo et al., 2003)
found that probably habitat availability and not dispersal is the key factor for the
shape of modern fern distribution ranges within the Japanese archipelago.
12.3╇ Evidence from the fern flora of the Azores
The Azores archipelago is a group of nine volcanic islands in the Northern Atlantic,
more than 1000 km off the European mainland (Portuguese coast) and more than
800 km from the closest island (Madeira). Its angiosperm flora is species-poor
(149 natives plus about 650 naturalised species) and mainly of European origin
(Schaefer, 2003; Carine and Schaefer, 2010). Its fern flora is similarly well known
(Schaefer, 2001b, 2003) and consists of 42 native and 24 naturalised species in 19
families (Fig 12.1).
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
Pt
er
id
ac
ea
As
e
pl
en
D
ia
ry
ce
op
ae
te
rid
ac
ea
W
e
oo
ds
ia
ce
Bl
ae
e
H
ym chn
ac
en
ea
op
e
hy
lla
O
ce
ph
ae
io
gl
os
sa
ce
Po
ae
ly
po
di
Th
a
el
ce
yp
ae
te
rid
ac
ea
Eq
e
ui
se
Lo
ta
m
c
ar
ea
io
e
ps
id
ac
ea
e
C
ul
D
ci
en
ta
ce
ns
ae
ta
ed
tia
ce
ae
M
ar
si
le
ac
O
ea
sm
e
un
da
ce
C
ae
ya
th
ea
ce
ae
Sa
lv
in
ia
ce
ae
0
Fig 12.1 The fern flora of the Azores:€number of species per family (grey€– native species;
black€– naturalised species); based on Schaefer (2003).
237
238
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
A
B
C
Fig 12.2 Endemic ferns of the Azores:€(A) Grammitis azorica; (B) Polypodium azoricum;
(C) Marsilea azorica (all photos by H. Schaefer).
The native fern flora is the result of c. 40 independent colonisation events
(Schaefer, 2001b). Even though the predominantly westerly winds of the region
should help American lineages to reach the islands, the native ferns are mainly
of European origin and the species composition is very similar to the fern flora
of Madeira (Schaefer, 2003; Vanderpoorten et al., 2007€ – but the latter analysis does not distinguish between native and naturalised species, rendering
its results questionable). Whether the native ferns reached the Azores through
stepping-stone colonisation via Madeira or directly from the continents
through parallel dispersal events has never been tested. Only six fern species
are thought to be Azorean endemics:€Asplenium azoricum, Dryopteris azorica,
Dryopteris crispifolia, Grammitis azorica (Fig 12.2A), Polypodium azoricum (Fig
12.2B) and Marsilea azorica (Fig 12.2C). Five of these endemic ferns occur on
two or more islands of the archipelago indicating that dispersal is not limited
at shorter distances (<â•›6 00â•›k m) but (so far) they seem to be unable to spread
to Madeira (850â•›k m away), which would have suitable habitats for all of them
(Schaefer, 2003; Rumsey et al., 2004). The only single island endemic among the
Azorean ferns is Marsilea azorica, an aquatic, heterosporous clover fern that is
known from only a single small pond on Terceira Island. Clover ferns are probably dispersed by waterfowl, but their dispersal ability was found to be very low
(Vitalis et al., 2002) and most of these birds are only rare vagrants in the Azores.
The small number of endemics and the absence of endemic radiations among
the Azorean ferns seem to support the Baas Becking hypothesis. However, a
similar pattern was found for the Azorean angiosperms and is perhaps related
w h at s h a p e s t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n r a n g e s o f f e r n s ?
7
6
Number of Species
5
4
3
2
1
0
America
Asia
Europe
Africa
Australia/New
Zealand
Fig 12.3 Origin of the naturalised fern flora of the Azores; based on Schaefer (2003).
to the palaeoclimatic history of the region rather than to dispersal or habitat
factors (Carine and Schaefer, 2010).
If ferns were not dispersal limited, one would expect to find very few invasive
fern species. Long-distance wind dispersal should have brought the spores of most
species to all suitable habitats so they should have been able to establish populations long before nurseries started to send ferns around the globe. However, there
are quite a few invasive fern species in the Azores as well as in other continental
and island ecosystems worldwide (e.g. some 30 species on Hawai’i; Wilson, 1996).
The 24 naturalised ferns of the Azores are mostly invasive (here defined as ‘spreading into natural habitats’) and common. Probably all of them were introduced as
ornamental plants by nineteenth century gardeners and soon escaped. Almost
identical proportions were introduced from the American continent, Africa, Asia,
continental Europe and Australia/New Zealand (Fig 12.3). Even though the proportion of naturalised species in ferns is much lower than in angiosperms (c. 30%
vs. c. 70%), these species seem to be highly competitive in disturbed and natural
habitats of the Azorean islands and most of them managed to spread throughout the archipelago within less than a century (Schaefer, 2001b). One of them,
Deparia petersenii (Fig 12.4A), was first reported from the Azores in 1907 but was
soon so well established that it was considered as a native and even an Azorean
endemic species for decades and described as Diplazium allorgei before it was
discovered that the species is actually native to Asia and only escaped from cultivation in the Azores. The tree fern Sphaeropteris cooperi (Fig 12.4B) was first
collected outside cultivated areas on Sao Miguel Island by B. Carreiro in 1895
239
240
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
A
B
C
Fig 12.4 Invasive ferns of the Azores:€(A) Deparia petersenii; (B) Sphaeropteris cooperi; (C)
Cyrtomium falcatum (all photos by H. Schaefer).
(specimen in the herbarium of Coimbra). Since then it spread to all other islands
of the group and is invasive in all types of lowland forest and former pastures
(Schaefer, 2003). This shows clearly that the habitat is suitable for all these species
but they did not manage to reach the Azores before gardeners transported them
across the Atlantic.
12.4╇ Discussion and conclusions
In general, ferns are extremely widespread and at family level mostly pantropical
to subcosmopolitan (Smith, 1972; Smith et al., 2006). This seems to support the
theory of unlimited dispersal in this plant group but other factors like high lineage
age or high number of species attributed to each family could also explain this pattern. At smaller scales, however, and when island fern floras are analysed, it turns
out that (a) the regional species composition (excluding introduced species) differs
considerably, often with high proportions of rare and localised (but not necessarily
endemic) species and (b) when fern species are introduced to areas outside their
current range or isolated archipelagos (e.g. the Azores, New Zealand or Hawai’i),
they can very often become invasive within less than a century (Schaefer, 2003).
This is strong evidence for the existence of dispersal barriers. Once they have been
crossed (e.g. by human-mediated transport), the habitat quality does not seem to
be a limiting factor as long as the climatic conditions allow the species to become
established.
All in all, the currently available data point to considerable dispersal limitations in ferns, perhaps comparable to those observed in most angiosperm groups.
w h at s h a p e s t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n r a n g e s o f f e r n s ?
Whether these are caused by the wind dispersal itself, by limitations related to
the breeding system of the different fern species or by a combination of factors
is unclear. More work on historical biogeography of the different fern lineages is
needed but already it seems clear that for ferns the Baas Becking hypothesis can
be rejected.
References
Baas Becking, L.G.M. (1934). Geobiologie
of inleiding tot de milieukunde.
The€Hague:€Van Stockum and Zoon.
Barrington, D.S. (1993). Ecological
and historical factors in fern
biogeography. Journal of Biogeography
20, 275–280.
Birks, H.J.B. (1976). The distribution of
European Pteridophytes:€a numerical
analysis. New Phytologist 77, 257–287.
Carine, M.A., Schaefer, H. (2010). The
Azores diversity enigma:€why are
there so few Azorean endemic
flowering plants and why are they so
widespread? Journal of Biogeography
37, 77–89.
Dassler, C.L., Farrar, D.R. (2001).
Significance of gametophyte form
in long-distance colonization by
tropical, epiphytic ferns. Brittonia 53,
352–369.
Flinn, K.M. (2006). Reproductive biology
of three fern species may contribute
to differential colonization success in
post-agricultural forests. American
Journal of Botany 93, 1289–1294.
Geiger, J.M.O., Ranker, T.A., Ramp Neale,
J.M., Klimas, S.T. (2007). Molecular
biogeography and origins of the
Hawaiian fern flora. Brittonia 59,
142–158.
Gradstein, R., van Zanten, B. (1999).
High altitude dispersal of spores:€an
experimental approach. XVI
International Botanical Congress, St.
Louis. Abstract 15.4.3.
Guo, Q., Kato, M., Ricklefs, R.E. (2003). Life
history, diversity and distribution:€a
study of Japanese pteridophytes.
Ecography 26, 129–138.
Haufler, C.H. (2007). Genetics,
phylogenetics and
biogeography:€considering how
shifting paradigms and continents
influence fern diversity. Brittonia 59,
108–114.
Janssen, T., Kreier, H.-P., Schneider, H.
(2007). Origin and diversification of
African ferns with special emphasis on
Polypodiaceae. Brittonia 59, 159–181.
Kato, M. (1993). Biogeography of
ferns:€dispersal and vicariance.
Journal of Biogeography 20, 265–274.
Little, D., Barrington, D.S. (2003). Major
evolutionary events in the origin
and diversification of the fern genus
Polystichum (Dryopteridaceae).
American Journal of Botany 90,
508–514.
Lloyd, R.M. (1974). Reproductive biology
and evolution in the pteridophyta.
Annals of the Missouri Botanical
Garden 61, 318–331.
Lloyd, R.M., Klekowski, E.J. (1970).
Spore germination and viability
in Pteridophyta:€evolutionary
significance of chlorophyllous spores.
Biotropica 2, 129–137.
241
242
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Pryer, K.M., Schuettpelz, E., Wolf, P.G.
et€al. (2004). Phylogeny and evolution
of ferns (monilophytes) with a
focus on the early leptosporangiate
divergences. American Journal of
Botany 91, 1582–1598.
Rumsey, F., Russel, S., Schaefer, H.,
Rasbach, H. (2004). Distribution,
ecology and cytology of Asplenium
azoricum Lovis, Rasbach and
Reichstein (Aspleniaceae,
Pteridophyta) and its hybrids.
American Fern Journal 94, 113–125.
Schaefer, H. (2001a). The Grammitidaceae,
Pteridophyta, of Macaronesia. Feddes
Repertorium 112, 509–523.
Schaefer, H. (2001b). Distribution and
status of the pteridophytes of Faial
island, Azores (Portugal). Fern Gazette
16, 213–237.
Schaefer, H. (2003). Chorology and
diversity of the Azorean Flora.
Dissertationes Botanicae 374. J.
Cramer, Stuttgart, 130 pp. + CD rom
(580 pp.).
Schneider, H., Schuettpelz, E., Pryer, K.M.
et al. (2004). Ferns diversified in the
shadow of angiosperms. Nature 428,
553–557.
Schneller, J.J. (1988). Remarks on
reproductive biology of homosporous
ferns. Plant Systematics and Evolution
161, 91–94.
Schneller, J.J., Haufler, C.H., Ranker, T.A.
(1990). Antheridiogen and natural
gametophyte populations. American
Fern Journal 80, 143–152.
Schuettpelz, E., Pryer, K.M. (2009).
Evidence for a Cenozoic radiation
of€ferns in an angiospermdominated€canopy. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences USA
106, 27.
Skog, J.E. (2001). Biogeography of Mesozoic
leptosporangiate ferns related to
extant ferns. Brittonia 53, 236–269.
Smith, A.R. (1972). Comparison of fern
and flowering plant distributions with
some evolutionary interpretations for
ferns. Biotropica 4, 4–9.
Smith, A.R., Pryer, K.M., Schuettpelz, E.
et al. (2006). A classification for extant
ferns. Taxon 55, 705–731.
Trewick, S.A., Morgan-Richards, M.,
Russell, S.J. et al. (2002). Polyploidy,
phylogeography and Pleistocene
refugia of the rockfern Asplenium
ceterach:€evidence from chloroplast
DNA. Molecular Ecology 11, 2003–2012.
Tryon, R. (1970). Development and
evolution of fern floras of Oceanic
islands. Biotropica 2, 76–84.
Tryon, R. (1972). Endemic areas and
geographic speciation in tropical
American ferns. Biotropica 4, 121–131.
Tryon, R. (1985). Fern speciation and
biogeography. Proceedings of the Royal
Society of Edinburgh 86B, 353–360.
Vanderpoorten, A., Rumsey, F., Carine,
M.A. (2007). Does Macaronesia exist?
Conflicting signal in the bryophyte
and pteridophyte floras. American
Journal of Botany 94, 625–639.
Vitalis, R., Riba, M., Colas, B., Grillas,€P.,
Olivieri, I. (2002). Multilocus genetic
structure at contrasted spatial
scales of the endangered water fern
Marsilea strigosa Willd. (Marsileaceae,
Pteridophyta). American Journal of
Botany 89, 1142–1155.
Vogel, J.C., Rumsey, F.J., Russell, S.J. et al.
(1999). Genetic structure, reproductive
biology and ecology in isolated
populations of Asplenium ciskii
(Aspeniaceae, Pteridophyta). Heredity
83, 604–612.
w h at s h a p e s t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n r a n g e s o f f e r n s ?
Wild, M., Gagnon, D. (2005). Does lack of
available suitable habitat explain the
patchy distributions of rare calcicole
fern species? Ecography 28, 191–196.
Wilson, K.A. (1996). Alien ferns in Hawai’i.
Pacific Science 50, 127–141.
Wolf, P.G., Schneider, H., Ranker, T.A.
(2001). Geographic distributions
of homosporous ferns:€does
dispersal€obscure evidence of
vicariance? Journal of Biogeography
28, 263–270.
243
13
Ubiquity of microscopic animals?
Evidence from the morphological
approach in species identification
Tom Artois1, Diego Fontaneto 2,
William D. Hummon3, Sandra J. McInnes 4 ,
M. Antonio Todaro5, Martin V. Sørensen 6
and Aldo Zullini 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Hasselt University, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Diepenbeek, Belgium
Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History,
Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Biology, Imperial College London, Ascot, UK
Department of Biological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA
British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK
Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena,
Italy
Natural History Museum of Denmark, Zoological Museum, Copenhagen,
Denmark
Dipartimento di Biotecnologie & Bioscienze, Università di Milano-Bicocca,
Milan, Italy
Biogeography of Microscopic Organisms: Is Everything Small Everywhere?, ed. Diego Fontaneto.
Published by Cambridge University Press. © The Systematics Association 2011.
u b i q u i t y o f m i c r o s c o p i c a n i m a l s?
13.1╇ Introduction
Zoologists always hope to find unusual and interesting new animals in exotic
places. Over the last few centuries, scientific expeditions in remote places outside
Europe and North America have indeed discovered new species and even higher
taxa of vertebrates, insects and other macroscopic animals, completely different
from the ones previously known in the home country. In contrast, scientists working on microscopic animals, looking at samples from remote areas, have often
found organisms that could be ascribed to familiar species. Microscopic animals
have thus been considered not interesting in biogeography, as their distribution
may not be limited by geography.
Are microscopic animals really widely distributed? Is their cosmopolitanism an
actual biological property or only a common misconception based on false assumptions and unreliable evidence? Is the scenario more complex than the claimed clearcut difference between micro- and macroscopic animals? This chapter will review
all the faunistic knowledge gathered so far on the global distribution of free-living
microscopic animals smaller than 2â•›mm (gastrotrichs, rotifers, tardigrades, micrognathozoans, cycliophorans, loriciferans, kinorhynchs and gnathostomulids).
Moreover, we will deal with microscopic free-living species in other groups of animals such as nematodes and flatworms, which have both micro- and macroscopic
species. The focus will be on species identification from traditional taxonomy based
on morphology, whereas Chapter 14 will deal with more recent evidence gathered
from analyses on molecular phylogeny and phylogeography from the same groups.
13.2╇ Gastrotrichs
(M. Antonio Todaro and William D. Hummon)
Gastrotrichs are microscopic free-living, acoelomate, aquatic worms of a meiobenthic lifestyle. In marine habitats they are mainly interstitial, whereas in fresh waters
they are ubiquitous in the periphyton and epibenthos, and to a limited extent
also in the plankton. Their total length ranges between 70â•›µm for the freshwater
Heterolepidoderma lamellatum and 3.5â•›mm for the marine Megadasys pacificus. The
simultaneous presence of ventral ciliation, adhesive tubes and terminal mouth make
the Gastrotricha easily distinguishable from other microscopic biota (Fig 13.1). The
body is enwrapped by a two-layered cuticle, which in many species forms protective
ornamentations such as plates, scales and spines, whose ample variety of shape and
size is extensively used for taxonomic purposes (e.g. taxon/species identification).
The phylum counts about 765 species grouped into two orders:€Macrodasyida,
with some 310 strap-shaped species (in 32 genera of eight families), all but two of
245
246
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Fig 13.1 Drawing of generalised gastrotrichs, seen from dorsal side:€(A) hermaphroditic
Macrodasyida, (B) parthenogenetic Chaetonotida (showing on the side different types of
cuticular covering), not in scale. cog:€caudal organ; eg:€egg; fog:€frontal organ; fu:€furca;
int:€intestine; lat:€lateral adhesive tubes; mth:€mouth; pha:€pharynx; phij:€pharyngeo-intestinal
junction; php:€pharyngeal pores; pl:€pleurae; t:€testis; tbr:€tactile bristle.
u b i q u i t y o f m i c r o s c o p i c a n i m a l s?
which are marine or estuarine, and Chaetonotida with some 455 tenpin-shaped
species (in 31 genera of eight families), 70% of which are freshwater (Balsamo et€a l.,
2009; Hummon and Todaro, 2010). The continuing discovery and description of
new species and the many areas of the world still unexplored with regard to the
gastrotrich fauna, suggest that these statistics should be considered as very conservative (e.g. Todaro et al., 2005; Hummon, 2008; Kanneby et al., 2009).
Macrodasyidan gastrotrichs are hermaphroditic practising internal, putatively
cross-fertilisation; the same appears to be true for members of the marine chaetonotidan families Muselliferidae, Neodasyidae and Xenotrichulidae (six genera and c. 30 spp.; Todaro and Hummon, 2008). By contrast, most chaetonotidans,
including all the freshwater families and also the marine representatives of the
family Chaetonotidae (c. 420 spp.), reproduce largely by obligate, apomictic parthenogenesis (Hummon, 1984). In fact, spermatozoa produced after the parthenogenetic phase (Weiss, 2001) have never been proved to be functional and their
ultrastructure suggests otherwise (e.g. Balsamo, 1992). Resting eggs are known for
several freshwater species, but so far they are unreported for marine taxa. High
gastrotrich diversity, found in temporary inland water bodies, suggests that the
occurrence of resting eggs is more widespread across the spectrum of freshwater
taxa than is currently believed. Among a handful of chaetonotidans cultured in
the laboratory, mature gastrotrichs lay 1–10 eggs singly, by rupture of the body wall,
eggs being attached to sediment grains, where cleavage usually begins (Balsamo
and Todaro, 1988). Development is direct and adulthood is reached within a few
days from hatching, with the lifespan extending from 10–20 days to a couple of
months. Almost nothing is known about macrodasyidans, but slower growth and
longer lifespan (6–12 months) should not come as a surprise for large marine species, such as species of Dolichodasys, where the presence of mature specimens
only in certain seasons is suggested (Todaro and Hummon, unpublished data).
The phylum Gastrotricha is cosmopolitan in distribution; this is also true of
the two orders, almost all families and taxonomically reliable genera. Given the
short life cycle, the small number of offspring, the absence of a pelagic larval stage
and the comparatively limited swimming ability of the adults, gastrotrich species
would be expected to have restricted geographic ranges. Dispersal via long-shore
currents over a long geological time combined with oceanic dispersal and continental drift may be invoked to explain biogeographic patterns of Gastrotricha
distribution in many marine systems; however, indirect dispersal by phoretic,
rafting and ballast may play a relevant role too. Of the 45 species found by Todaro
et al. (1995) along the northern Gulf of Mexico the proportion of amphi-Atlantic/
cosmopolitan, regional and endemic species found amounted to 60, 22 and 18%
respectively, most endemics being macrodasyidans. Of the 56 putative species
found by Todaro and Rocha (2004, 2005) from the Brazilian beaches of the State of
São Paulo, 31 (55%) could be endemics, again mostly macrodasyidans. A key role of
the asexual reproduction in the widespread distribution of chaetonotidian species
247
248
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
in marine habitas is best testified to by the high occurrence among cosmopolitan
taxa of the initially parthenogenetic Chaetonotidae and by the widespread geography of three marine species belonging to otherwise hermaphroditic higher taxa,
i.e. Draculiciteria tesselata, Heteroxenotrichula pygmaea and Urodasys viviparus.
Meanwhile, one of the species found along the Gulf of Mexico has been reclassified
as a new species (Xenotrichula lineata, redescribed as X. paralineata, see Hummon
and Todaro, 2007), so that the contrasts between North and South America indicate that a latitudinal gradient may have influenced the biogeographic patterns of
marine gastrotrichs. Hermaphroditic species currently thought as cosmopolitan
gastrotrichs may be reconsidered as having narrower geographic boundaries as
more precise studies are completed, e.g. some species of Neodasys and Musellifer
(see Hochberg, 2005; Leasi and Todaro, 2010). In this framework, a paradigmatic
example is provided by the chaetonotidan Xenotrichula intermedia. Todaro et al.
(1996), using morphometric characters and mitochondrial DNA (CO-I), demonstrated that trans-Atlantic morphologically indistinguishable populations are
in fact genetically distinct, bearing different haplotypes with genetic divergence
among populations up to 11%. Also, individuals of the Mediterranean Sea and
the Arabian Gulf, that appear almost identical when surveyed with conventional
microscopy (i.e. DIC and/or SEM), show clearly different arrangements of the muscular system when studied under confocal microscopy (Leasi and Todaro, 2009).
Small size of the adults and resting eggs makes freshwater gastrotrichs good candidates for passive dispersal, aerial and especially phoretic. For instance, single parthenogenetic females hatching from resting eggs and transported over wide areas
and even around the world by avian fauna, could initiate a new population. By contrast, many species have been reported as having a wide distribution with a large
number of certain cases of cosmopolitanism. Balsamo et al. (2008), in summarising
data for freshwater taxa, reported that approximately 33% of European species appear
to be cosmopolitan. Detailed faunistic comparisons at several spatial scales were
made by Kisielewski (1991, 1999) through extensive studies carried out in Poland,
Brazil and Israel. About 34% of the species found in the South American countries
were also known in Europe, while in Israel the percentage of European species was
higher, 55%, probably due to the closer zoogeographic relationships and shorter distance between the two areas. The high diversity of endemic freshwater genera in
the Brazilian fauna, evidenced by Kisielewski (1991), may be due to the scarcity of
comparable works carried out in other tropical-equatorial regions of the world. The
great faunistic homogeneity of the European freshwater gastrotrich fauna, on the
other hand, seems confirmed by preliminary results of the first extensive survey in
Sweden, which found several Italian Ichtydium species previously unknown outside
the Mediterranean peninsula (Kanneby et al., 2009, and own unpublished data).
To summarise, in spite of the unsatisfactory knowledge of their taxonomy, Gastrotricha do exhibit specific patterns of diversity and distribution.
u b i q u i t y o f m i c r o s c o p i c a n i m a l s?
Notwithstanding possible problems and biases in the interpretations of gastrotrich distribution, some blueprints emerge:€ the percentage of widespread taxa
is high, especially among the highly speciose chaetonotids; some species have a
more restricted geographic range, but even these species are relatively widespread
within one biogeographic region. Future molecular and detailed microscopy
investigations will reveal whether morphological identification based on current
microscopical techniques alone may be misleading, as the case of Xenotrichula
intermedia seems to suggest.
13.3╇ Rotifers
(Diego Fontaneto)
Rotifers (see Wallace et al., 2006 for a recent review of the group) are common microscopic aquatic animals, smaller than 2â•›mm and usually between 50â•›µ m and 800â•›µ m
in length. They can be easily distinguished from other microscopic organisms by
the corona of cilia on the head (Fig 13.2) and by the typical hard jaws called trophi;
these trophi are so variable that they are widely used as a species-specific taxonomic
feature. There are three major groups of rotifers:€monogononts, bdelloids and seisonids. Monogonont rotifers may occur in any kind of water and are the richest group,
with 1500 species (Wallace et al., 2006; Segers, 2007); they reproduce by cyclical
parthenogenesis and the outcome of sexual recombination is usually a dormant
embryo called a resting egg, which is considered the dispersal propagule. Bdelloid
rotifers only reproduce via obligate parthenogenesis, indeed only females are present (Ricci and Fontaneto, 2009); they occur in any aquatic habitat, from proper
water bodies to soil, lichens, mosses and even to deserts; c. 450 species have been
described. They are able to enter a dormant stage in any period of their life; in their
dry dormant stage they can be passively dispersed. Resting eggs in monogononts
and dormant stages in bdelloids can remain viable for a long time, surviving desiccation, high temperatures and frost, and thus may act as very effective indirect
dispersal propagules. The third group of rotifers, seisonids, is represented by four
marine species living only as epibionts on crustaceans of the genus Nebalia (Ricci
et al., 1993). They do not have resting stages and very few data are available on their
distribution; thus, they will not be mentioned here.
The presence of small and drought-resistant dormant stages, perfectly tailored
for passive dispersal, aerial or phoretic, make both monogonont and bdelloid
rotifers potential candidates for a widespread or even cosmopolitan distribution.
Moreover, parthenogenetic females hatch from resting eggs in monogononts and
recover from dormancy in bdelloids, so that a single individual can potentially
found a new population. These biological properties combined with presumed
249
250
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Fig 13.2 Scanning electron microsopy micrographs of (A) a monogonont rotifer,
Notommata collaris, in ventral view and (B) a bdelloid rotifer, the potential ‘flagship’
species, Pleuretra hystrix in lateral view.
ubiquity, traditionally were believed to render rotifers useless for biogeographic
studies (Rousselet, 1909; Hutchinson, 1967; Ball, 1976). Indeed, many species have
been reported from different continents, thus supporting their ubiquity (Fontaneto
et al., 2007; Segers, 2007).
Other than a large number of cosmopolitan species, another theoretical expectation of rotifer ubiquity is that a locally large representation of the global diversity should be found (Fenchel and Finlay, 2004). This expectation appears to be
fulfilled by rotifers:€ in that any temperate or tropical water body is expected to
host between 150 and 250 species respectively, that is 7–12.5% of global diversity
(Dumont and Segers, 1996). In a study focused on bdelloids, 20% of all known species were found in a few samples collected in one afternoon in a small valley in
Italy (Fontaneto et al., 2006).
According to this evidence, rotifers seem to be potentially and actually ubiquitous. Nevertheless, the fact that some species may be cosmopolitan does not
immediately imply that all rotifers are cosmopolitan. Early studies from the 1970s
provided increasing evidence of spatial patterns in rotifer biogeography and
u b i q u i t y o f m i c r o s c o p i c a n i m a l s?
restricted distributions, comparable to those commonly found in larger animals.
For example, Green (1972) showed a latitudinal zonation in planktonic rotifers;
Pejler (1977) confirmed restricted distributions in monogononts of the family
Brachionidae, highlighting a striking number of endemic species in Lake Baikal
for the genus Notholca; and De Ridder (1981) demonstrated limited distribution
for almost 50% of periphytic and benthic rotifers. More recently, the suspicion
that the apparent cosmopolitanism was due more to inadequate knowledge than
to reality arose (Dumont, 1983; Segers, 1996). More detailed studies on specific
taxa of monogononts found compelling evidence of endemic species for several
genera in all the major biogeographic regions:€ with 6–22% of all Lecane spp. in
each region being endemic (Segers, 1996); hotspots of biodiversity and endemism
exist for Trichocerca in the northern hemisphere, especially north-east Nearctic
(Segers, 2003); in the case of Keratella, hotspots of relict endemics have been identified in the east Palaearctic and in temperate and cold regions of the southern
hemisphere, together with a recent radiation in the Nearctic (Segers and De Smet,
2008).
Recently, Segers (2008) analysed the non-marine fauna (96.5% of all rotifers)
and found that in monogononts 44% of the species are endemic to one biogeographic region and only 23% of the species may be considered as truly cosmopolitan (defined as present in five or more of the eight biogeographic regions); the
same scenario was also shown for bdelloids, with 51% endemic and only 13% truly
cosmopolitan species.
It is of course difficult to ascertain the absence of rotifer species from any specific
area, especially with the dearth of available information. Moreover, many species
are known only from the locality where they have been described; even in Europe,
the most well-known area, c. 25% of the c. 300 European bdelloids have never been
collected since their original description (Fontaneto and Melone, 2003). Thus, the
high number of species supposedly endemic for only one biogeographic region
may reflect a biased picture, resulting from a lack of knowledge rather than representing the actual distribution pattern. Faunistic data for rotifers are scarce, and
it has been suggested that rotifer distribution follows the distribution of rotiferologists studying them and not the actual distribution of rotifers (Wallace et al., 2006).
Notwithstanding this problem, some easily recognised ‘flagship’ species (sensu
Foissner, 2006), are limited in distribution. For instance, the bdelloid Pleuretra
hystrix, with a characteristic spiny lorica (Fontaneto and Melone, 2003), is known
only from arctic or alpine samples; it has never been found in the Antarctic or
sub-Antarctic area, despite the more intensive southern polar faunistic studies for
bdelloids (Kaya et al., 2010).
It is interesting to note, however, that even some of the biological assumptions
for widespread distribution in rotifers are not verified but originate from potentially unreliable generalisations. For instance, resting eggs are known only for
251
252
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
very few species, and it is only assumed, but not proven, that all monogononts are
able to produce them:€thus, it is possible that only few species have such potential
for passive dispersal. Moreover, resting eggs of some species do not survive desiccation, and hatching from dormant resting eggs is triggered by rather specific
environmental cues, so that even if dispersal may be possible, colonisation of distant habitats is prevented.
There are also other caveats when considering rotifer biogeography. For instance,
rotifer taxonomy is all but adequate and it is almost exemplary of the taxonomic
impediment; many new species are still to be discovered and very few taxonomists are actively working on rotifers (Dumont, 1980; Segers and De Smet, 2008).
Moreover, species identification from morphology alone may be misleading, as
suggested by the increasing evidence of complexes of cryptic species in all rotifers
analysed so far (Gómez et al., 2002; Schroeder and Walsh, 2007; Fontaneto et al.,
2009).
These difficulties may have a significantly negative impact on our ability to understand the diversity of rotifers and consequently their distribution. Nevertheless, in
spite of the unsatisfactory knowledge of their taxonomy, rotifers do exhibit patterns of diversity and distribution. Notwithstanding possible problems and biases
in the interpretations of rotifer distribution, one pattern is clear:€t he percentage of
widespread taxa is high; some species are more restricted geographically, but even
the species with more restricted distributions are relatively widespread within
one biogeographic region. Moreover, almost all genera and higher taxa are really
cosmopolitan, one feature that is completely different from macroscopic organisms, even if the definition of taxa higher than species in different groups may not
be directly comparable.
13.4╇ Tardigrades
(Sandra J. McInnes)
Tardigrades, common name for the phylum Tardigrada, are also known as water
bears, moss piglets and bear animalcules (Fig 14.3). They were first recorded in
the 1770s (Goeze, 1773; Spallanzani, 1776) and have been subject to several monographs and systematic revisions (Thulin, 1928; Marcus, 1929, 1936; Ramazzotti,
1962, 1972; Ramazzotti and Maucci, 1983). They are ‘aquatic’ in that they require a
coating of water to permit locomotion and respiration. As a common component
of the limno-terrestrial meiofauna they are found in a variety of habitats including bryophytes, cushion-forming plants, lichens, algae and soils, to truly aquatic
habitats, and from polar to tropical environments. Marine tardigrades range from
the tide line to the abyssal depths.
u b i q u i t y o f m i c r o s c o p i c a n i m a l s?
Tardigrades are typically 100–500â•›µ m but range from 50 to 1700â•›µ m. They are
cylindrical with four pairs of lobopodal limbs that terminate in ‘claws’; they have a
nervous system that may include eyespots and sensory structures, a digestive tract
with mouth and anus, and a reproductive system (Kinchin, 1994; Nelson, 2002). Two
classes are recognised; the Heterotardigrada, incorporating the Arthrotardigrada
(marine) and Echiniscoidea (marine and terrestrial); and the Eutardigrada,
incorporating the Parachela (mainly terrestrial) and Apochela (terrestrial). A third
class (Mesotardigrada) with a single species is considered dubious (e.g. Nelson,
2002; Nelson and McInnes, 2002) as neither the type material nor the type locality have survived. The original description of this species (Thermozodium esakii)
was limited and modern classification now suggests a potential relationship with
Carphaniidae, which is placed in the order Echiniscoidea (Binda and Kristensen,
1986). The palaeontological record for tardigrades is limited to subfossil records
from Cretaceous amber (Cooper, 1964; Bertolani and Grimaldi, 2000), Eocene lake
sediments (Cromer et al., 2006, 2008), and Pliocene peat cores (Jankovska, 1991;
Miller and Heatwole, 2003). A current comprehensive taxonomic summary of all
known extant tardigrade taxa can be found in Guidetti and Bertolani (2005) with
updates in Degma and Guidetti (2007) and at:€ http://www.tardigrada.modena.
unimo.it/miscellanea/Actual%20checklist%20of%20Tardigrada.pdf
Reproductive strategies within the Tardigrada include both sexual and parthenogenesis (Nelson, 1982a; Bertolani, 1982, 1987; Rebecchi and Bertolani, 1988,
1994; Bertolani and Rebecchi, 1999), with parthenogenesis conveying an advantage for the invasion of new habitats. Reproduction produces eggs (40–60â•›µ m in
diameter), which may be smooth and laid singly or en masse inside an exuvium
or are ornamented and laid free. Both individually free eggs and those encased
in exuvia have the potential for transportation. As with many of the micrometazoans, changes in environmental conditions can induce the tardigrade to enter a
latent state (i.e. cryptobiosis). Cryptobiosis provides resistance to environmental
extremes (i.e. cold, heat, drought, chemicals and ionising radiation), which has a
significant impact on the ecological role of the organism (see Wright et al., 1992;
Kinchin, 1994; Wright, 2001) and offers the potential for relatively long-range dispersal (Kristensen, 1987; Pugh and McInnes, 1998).
The combination of small size, parthenogenesis and potential for cryptobiosis had
led to the assumption that limno-terrestrial tardigrades should be cosmopolitan.
However, the analysis of the most likely form of transport€– wind€– has barely been
explored. A simple experiment run by Sudzuki (1972) showed that tardigrades and
other microinvertebrates were rarely dispersed by wind speeds less than 2â•›m/s over 2
months. In the Antarctic, Janiec (1996) and Nkem et al. (2006) found that most microinvertebrates are transported with sediment or habitat (moss, lichen) near ground
level and over relatively short distances. Kristensen (1987) mentioned that Echiniscus
sp. were ‘common in raindrops or ‘air plankton’ after Föhn storms in Greenland’.
253
254
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Tardigrada have a limited suite of morphological characters and are morphologically conserved, factors which make traditional taxonomic classification challenging. For example, in some of the early reports bi-polar tardigrade species were
recorded (e.g. Richters, 1905; Murray, 1906), which in part may be a consequence
of the then relatively immature state of tardigrade taxonomy, microscopy limitations and observer expectations. Subsequent researchers have used the predominantly northern hemisphere taxonomic literature to create several cosmopolitan
species or group-complexes (e.g. Echiniscus arctomys, Pseudechiniscus suillus,
Macrobiotus harmsworthi, Mac. hufelandi, Minibiotus intermedius, Hypsibius
convergens, H. dujardini, Diphascon (Diphascon) pingue, Milnesium tardigradum). More recent traditional taxonomic literature has indicated that some of
these group-complexes are ‘hiding’ a number of species that are more restricted
in their distribution (e.g. Bertolani and Rebecchi, 1993; Claxton, 1998).
The confusion over group-complexes and potential errors in published taxonomic records would imply that the phylum Tardigrada was not a good subject
for biogeographic studies. However, there seems to be a general understanding that while there are cosmopolitan genera, most of these exhibiting parthenogenesis and capable of cryptobiosis (Pilato, 1979), not all genera are
cosmopolitan and many of these have a lower capacity for cryptobiosis and/
or reproduce sexually (Kristensen, 1987). Of the 64 limno-terrestrial genera only 11 are considered endemic (Europe:€ Macroversum (Murryidae),
Necopinatum (Necopinatidae), Carphania (Carphaniidae), Pseudohexapodibius
(Macrobiotidae); Africa:€ Paradiphascon (Hypsibiidae); Asia:€ Famelobiotus
(Macrobiotidea); Australasia:€ Milnesioides, Limmenius (Milnesiidae); North
America:€ Haplohexapodibius (Calohypsibiidae), Proechiniscus (Echiniscidae);
South America:€ Minilentus (Macrobiotidae)). Endemism at the species level is
relatively high (between 25–58%) for the major continents (McInnes and Pugh,
2007). Despite the potential identification problems, Tardigrada can be used to
explore biogeography (Pilato and Binda, 2001) and the current biogeographic
distribution patterns of the non-marine tardigrades show evidence of palaeogeographic events such as the break-up of Pangaea, and the division of east and
west Gondwana (McInnes and Pugh, 2007).
13.5╇ Micrognathozoans, cycliophorans, loriciferans,
kinorhynchs and gnathostomulids
(Martin V. Sørensen)
Other microscopic animals exist which may provide further empirical evidence
supporting or denying cosmopolitanism for microorganisms.
u b i q u i t y o f m i c r o s c o p i c a n i m a l s?
Micrognathozoa is a recently described animal group with affinities to Rotifera
and Gnathostomulida (Sørensen, 2003). Only one species, Limnognathia maerski,
is currently known, and our extremely scarce knowledge about its biogeography
suggests that it has a peculiar bipolar and patchy distribution. The species was
described from a spring on Disko Island, Greenland (Kristensen and Funch, 2000),
where it occurs in relatively high numbers in the short Arctic summer. Among the
thousands of springs on Disko Island, it has only been recorded in one other spring
on the island, and only at a single occasion (R. M. Kristensen, personal communication). Outside Disko Island, the species has been recorded once from a spring
area in Wales, UK (J. M. Schmid-Araya, personal communication), and from the
Subantarctic Crozet Islands (De Smet, 2002). On the latter, the species is quite
abundant. The Subantarctic recording of the species, in particular, is puzzling.
The great distance between this locality and the Greenlandic type locality suggests that the species possess a great migratory potential, but this is contradicted
by the otherwise very few recordings of the species. The most likely explanation
would probably be that L. maerski is a relatively widespread species throughout
the cold and temperate regions of both hemispheres, but that it often occurs in
very low numbers, and therefore are rarely encountered. In general, L. maerski
does not appear to be a species adapted for distribution over great ranges. The
adults are short lived, without cryptobiotic capabilities, and apparently intolerant
to great abiotic changes in their environment. However, since they can survive
the Arctic winter, one would expect that at least the eggs are freeze tolerant, and
therefore could be tolerant to dehydration and other stresses that would be lethal
for the hatched specimen. One kind of micrognathozoan egg actually resembles
sculptured rotifer resting eggs, but hatching from previously frozen eggs has not
yet been observed, hence this adaptation is still speculative. However, if the sculptured eggs turn out to be comparable with rotifer resting eggs, they would be more
suitable for dispersal than the adults.
Cycliophora is another recently discovered microscopic animal group with
only few known species (Funch and Kristensen, 1995). The animals live as commensals on the mouthparts of lobsters, and are characterised by an extremely
complex life cycle that involves asexual feeding stages, parthenogenetic Pandora
larvae, short-lived females, Prometheus larvae that produce dwarf males, and
the sexually produced chordoid larvae (Funch and Kristensen, 1997; Obst and
Funch, 2003). Currently two species are described:€ Symbion pandora from the
Norwegian lobster, Nephrops norvegicus (Funch and Kristensen, 1995), and
Symbion americanus from the American lobster Homarus americanus (Obst et al.,
2006). A yet to be described species has been recorded from the European lobster,
Homarus gammarus in the Mediterranean Sea (Nedved, 2004; Baker and Giribet,
2007; R.€ M.€ Kristensen, personal communication). Symbion pandora has been
recorded on the Norwegian lobster all along the Atlantic European West Coast
255
256
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
from Norway to Portugal and around Faroe Island (Funch and Kristensen, 1997;
Neves et al., 2010). The American species, S. americanus, is distributed along the
North American East Coast, and€has been found in lobster populations at several
localities between Nova Scotia and Maryland (Obst et al., 2006; Baker et al., 2007).
Symbion americanus appears to be a complex of cryptic species that may co-occur
on the same lobster specimen (Baker et al., 2007). Knowledge on the distribution
of these organisms is still scanty, but it seems that each morphologically recognisable species is restricted to specific regions (Northern Europe, east coast of
North America and Mediterranean Sea, respectively), and that the cryptic species
on H.€americanus do not show any geographic patterning and their distributions
overlap (Baker et al., 2007).
The restricted distribution is clearly tied to the host specificity, cycliophoran
species are constrained to the distribution of the host. Furthermore, no stage in
the cycliophoran life cycle is adapted for dispersal over greater ranges. The feeding stage is sessile, while the female, the Prometheus larva and the Pandora larva
are only capable of moving over very short distances€– probably not longer than
from one mouthpart bristle to another. Usually the chordoid larva is considered
the ‘dispersal stage’ in the life cycle, as it has the most developed locomotory ciliation (Funch and Kristensen, 1997). However, ‘dispersal’ in this context means
dispersal to another mouth appendage, or eventually, another host in the same
population. Nothing indicates that the chordoid larva can disperse over greater
distances. Until now species of cycliophorans have been recorded from Europe
and northeast America only, and other preliminary reports of potential cycliophorans from other parts of the world have always turned out to be sessile protists
after closer examination.
Loricifera (Kristensen, 1983) is another recently described phylum of microscopic marine animal. The loriciferans are among the smallest known metazoans,
but they are morphologically complex, and may have an extremely complicated
life cycle with various larval and pre-adult stages. They are found in the interstices
of sand and shell gravel, but may also be present in more muddy sediments. The
first loriciferans were described from coastal areas in West Europe and along the
North American East Coast (Kristensen, 1983; Higgins and Kristensen, 1986), but
more recent studies have demonstrated a relatively high loriciferan diversity on
banks and seamounts (Heiner, 2004, 2008; Gad, 2005a). In addition, the number
of recordings and discovery of new species from the deep sea is currently increasing, and there are indications that the deep sea holds a diverse loriciferan fauna
(Kristensen and Shirayama, 1988; Gad, 2005b, 2005c).
Loricifera have now been recorded in most parts of the world, and so the
group can be considered cosmopolitan (e.g. Todaro and Kristensen, 1998; Gad
and Martinez Arbizu, 2005; Heiner et al., 2009). The species, however, all have
relatively limited distributions, and usually a species is restricted to a specific
u b i q u i t y o f m i c r o s c o p i c a n i m a l s?
region, such as the West European Coast or North American East Coast. However,
the distribution of the animals is extremely patchy, which limits the chances of
finding a species outside its type locality, or sometimes even the chances of refinding it on a locality where it previously has been recorded. The latter is probably best exemplified by one of the first loriciferan specimens ever recorded.
The specimen was collected in 1975 in Øresund, Denmark, but was lost during
preparation. Knowing that the individual could represent a new animal phylum,
the locality was sampled intensively for several years to obtain more specimens;
but even today, 35 years later, no further loriciferans have been recorded from
Øresund.
It is unclear why loriciferans occur in such a patchy distribution and why they do
not, at least in coastal areas, form more continuous populations. One explanation
could be very specific requirements to the sediment and abiotic conditions in their
habitat, but this is only speculation. What is certain, however, is that no stage in
the loriciferan life cycle is specialised for dispersal over great distances. Neither
the eggs, the primary larva (Higgins larva, see Fig 13.3A), nor the adult appear
to leave the sediment; even still, in the sediment they move very slowly. Species
that inhabit seamounts or submarine banks are likewise trapped on these localities. For example, a species that is adapted to inhabit the calcareous shell sediment on Faroe Bank (see Heiner, 2004, 2008) would have difficulties leaving the
bank and would therefore need to migrate through the surrounding muddy sediments to reach another bank in the area. Our knowledge on deep sea loriciferans is
Fig 13.3 Scanning electron microscopy micrographs of (A) Higgins larva of an as yet
undescribed species of Loricifera from the Western Pacific and (B) the kinorhynch species
Campyloderes cf. macquariae from the Faroe Island, North Atlantic; this species could be
the only known example of a cosmopolitan kinorhynch. Light (C) and scanning electron
(D) micrographs of the gnathostomulid Rastrognathia macrostoma, showing its head
with the prominent pharyngeal hard parts inside (C), and the isolated hard parts (D).
257
258
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
still extremely limited, but it is not unlikely that loriciferans living at great depths
would show broader distributional ranges.
The Kinorhyncha represents another phylum of marine, microscopic animals.
They are composed of a head with numerous appendages (so-called scalids), a
short neck region and a trunk with 11 segments. Kinorhynchs show the highest
diversity in muddy sediments, but are also present in sandy sediments (Sørensen
and Pardos, 2008). They are known from marine localities throughout the world
and have the highest levels of diversity in coastal areas. The latter, however, may
be a sampling artefact due to coastal areas being sampled more frequently than
less accessible oceanic and deep sea localities, and thus does not reflect the true
distribution of the species.
The known kinorhynch distribution in some ways resembles the distributional
patterns for loriciferans; their occurrence is patchy (although more consistent
than the loriciferans), and the distribution of a species appears to be regional
and in restricted areas of a few hundred kilometres squared. Our knowledge
on kinorhynch distribution is still scarce. Only a few regions, such as the North
American East Coast, the European West Coast and the Mediterranean, can be
considered relatively well-investigated in terms of systematic kinorhynch studies,
but even within these regions, the discovery of new species is not unusual (e.g.
GaOrdóñez et al., 2008). When sampling in previously unstudied regions, discovering new species is much more likely than finding known ones (e.g. Sørensen,
2008; Sørensen and Rho, 2009). There are only a few examples of either cosmopolitan kinorhynch species distribution, or a distribution that spans across several oceans, and whether specimens from distant and separated populations are
conspecific is questionable. One of the few kinorhynchs that, according to previous recordings, could be considered cosmopolitan is Echinoderes dujardinii. The
species is widely distributed through the Mediterranean and along the European
West Coast, but it has also been reported from Japan and the North American West
Coast. In light of this rather wide distribution, Higgins (1977) revised the species
and concluded that the identity of the Japanese specimens should be considered
doubtful, and reports of the American specimens, in actuality, were based on a
new species that he described as E. kozloffi. Consequently, E. dujardinii turned
out to be a strictly European species, with a restricted and continuous distribution
along the European West Coast.
There are only one or two kinorhynch species that are currently candidates as
true cosmopolitans, but the taxonomy of these species, or species complexes, is
puzzling and currently under investigation. The species Campyloderes vanhoeffeni and C. macquariae (Fig 13.3B) are both described from localities close to
Antarctica (Zelinka, 1913; Johnston, 1938). In the descriptions the two species
appear literally identical and they should most certainly be considered as a single species. Interestingly, C. macquariae/vanhoeffeni has over the years been
u b i q u i t y o f m i c r o s c o p i c a n i m a l s?
reported from various localities around the world, including New Caledonia,
Korea, Galapagos, the Pacific Coast of Central America and the North Atlantic
(see complete list in Sørensen and Pardos, 2008). Specimens from additional
localities are currently being examined (Neuhaus and Sørensen, work in progress), and the numerous recordings suggest that this could be the only example
of a cosmopolitan kinorhynch species. However, specimens from the various
populations tend to differ in minor details, and the consistency of this variation
still requires further studies to determine if they indicate the presence of several
distinct and regionally restricted species, or whether C. macquariae/vanhoeffeni
is a true cosmopolitan.
In general kinorhynchs do not possess any dispersal mechanisms that would
suggest cosmopolitanism or very wide distributional ranges. They have no locomotory cilia, and move very slowly through the sediment, and thus are unable to
enter the epibenthic or pelagic zones. In fact, their highly hydrophobic cuticular
surface makes even a short stay in the open water rather dangerous, as contact
with a small air bubble would mean immediate adhesion and subsequent transport to the surface where they would be trapped. Additionally their eggs are not
efficient dispersal stages because only one or a few eggs are laid at a time, and they
are immediately coated with detritus and sediment (Kozloff, 2007). This makes it
even more unlikely that the eggs could enter the water column and be dispersed
by the water currents.
Gnathostomulida is a phylum of microscopic marine worms that inhabit the
interstices in sandy sediments. The animals appear in many ways very simple, but
are equipped with a rather complex pharyngeal apparatus (Sterrer, 1972; Sørensen
and Sterrer, 2002). About 100 valid species are currently known, of which some
show very narrow distributional ranges, whereas others must be considered cosmopolites (e.g. Sterrer, 1998). As is the case with many other meiofaunal organisms, Gnathostomulida is an under-sampled group and thus their biodiversity
and the distributional ranges of known species are probably greater than we currently know. Nevertheless, we have indications that distributional ranges differ
greatly between the species. For example, Rastrognathia macrostoma represents a
species of the monotypic genus Rastrognathia (Kristensen and Nørrevang, 1977);
specimens are always found in relatively high numbers at its type locality north
of Zealand, Denmark, but this species or any other undescribed Rastrognathia
species have never been recorded anywhere else. Its pharyngeal hard parts are
very prominent (Fig 13.3C), and if specimens had been collected elsewhere, they
would not have been confused with anything else; this indicates that R. macrostoma most probably has a very limited distribution. Several other gnathostomulid
species are only known from single localities, and even some genera, for example
Problognathia, Valvognathia and Ratugnathia are known from very restricted
areas (Sterrer and Farris, 1975; Kristensen and Nørrevang, 1978; Sterrer, 1991).
259
260
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Examples of more widely distributed species are found within the genus
Gnathostomula. Along the European West Coast, Gnathostomula paradoxa is one
of the most common and widely distributed gnathostomulid species. At the same
latitudes, but along the North American East Coast, G. armata tends to be widespread and common, and further south, along the Carolinas, Florida and in the
Caribbean, G. peregrina tends to be the dominant species.
Finally, some species appear to be true cosmopolitans; this is especially true
among the filospermoid genera Haplognathia, Pterognathia and Cosmognathia,
where the likelihood of cosmopolitanism is high. For example, the species
Haplognathia rosea and H. ruberrima have been reported from the Southwest
Pacific, the Central Pacific, the Caribbean, the Northwest and Northeast Atlantic,
and Scandinavian waters, whereas P. ctenifera also is known from various localities in the Pacific, West Atlantic and Caribbean (Sterrer, 1968, 1991, 1997, 1998,
2001). These distributions indicate that all three species could be considered
cosmopolitan. It is likely that molecular studies would indicate significant genetic
distances between the populations and that all three would represent complexes
of several cryptic species; this remains to be tested.
Currently it remains puzzling why some gnathostomulid species show great
regionality whereas others have worldwide distributions. Nothing indicates that
they should be specialised migrators, and since all species are strictly interstitial
they would be unable to travel through muddy sediments. They are furthermore direct developers; as such there are no planktonic larvae that could serve as dispersal
stages. Oviposition and egg development have only been described from a single
species, Gnathostomula jenneri; here the egg is laid in the sediment and immediately
attached to the substratum (Riedl, 1969), which disables the egg from spreading.
13.6╇ Nematodes
(Aldo Zullini)
Nematodes (Fig 13.4) are probably the most numerous metazoan group living on
our planet. In non-desert soil there are, on average, about 2 million individuals
per square metre, and at the sea bottom their abundance, following a conservative
estimate, is about 100 thousand individuals per square metre (Lambshead, 2004);
there are at least 1020 nematodes in the world. Assuming nematodes are on average 1â•›mm in body length, a queue of all these individuals would span a distance
equivalent to 10 light years. The number of known species, in contrast, is not as
impressive:€there are about 27╛000 nominal species, half of them free-living, and
half plant and zooparasites. However, many authors think that the existing nematode species may be 105 or even 106 (Hugot et al., 2001). The biogeography of the
u b i q u i t y o f m i c r o s c o p i c a n i m a l s?
Fig 13.4 Anterior end of a soil nematode (Mylonchulus sp.), a predaceous species about
1.5â•›m m long. (Photo L. Poiras).
parasitic species depends on the hosts; therefore they obey macrofaunal dispersal
logic. The biogeography of marine nematodes is still poorly known (Lambshead,
2004; Tchesunov, 2006) and goes beyond the scope of the present work. We consider
the free-living soil and freshwater species only, remembering that a clearcut taxonomic distinction between these two nematode groups does not exist.
At a microscale level it is well known that soil nematodes exhibit an aggregate distribution tied to their limited dispersal and to the soil resource patchiness (Ettema
and Wardle, 2002). But at the large geographic level, the existence of recognisable
species patterns is still unclear. Much work was conducted on nematode dispersal; given that many soil species and some freshwater species are able to withstand
dryness and low temperatures in cryptobiosis (anhydrobiosis) for many months or
years, it has been postulated that nematodes in this state can be dispersed at great
distances (Womersley et al., 1998; Wharton, 2004). Applying mathematical models,
Carroll and Viglierchio (1981) found that dust-devil events can redeposit a significant
number of nematodes within 0.5–1.5 km from a given vortex, whereas deposition
261
262
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
at longer distances (13–40 km downwind) are much rarer. They calculated that the
nematode eggs are less transportable. The dispersion of nematodes by wind is possible for dry soils and this has been studied by catching transported soil in traps.
In Texas, Orr and Newton (1971) placed traps 2â•›m above ground to catch the windtransported sand; in total 28 genera of free-living and plant parasitic nematodes were
collected. In the most ancient European desert (44°50ʹN, 21°10ʹE, near Belgrade) the
sand caught by traps 1╛m above ground contained from 2 to 9 nematodes€per 100 ml,
mainly Dorylaimida, Tylenchomorpha and Rhabditomorpha (Krnjaic’ and Krnjaic’,
1973). In the peanut-cropping area of Senegal, traps (pots opened at ground level)
to collect wind-transported sand, captured nematodes (mainly mycophagous and
bacteriophagous species, Dorylaimida and Tylenchomorpha being less numerous)
especially during the dry season (Baujard and Martiny, 1994). On the coastal dunes
in the Netherlands 30 nematodes per 100 g dry soil were found in the sand traps (de
Rooij-van der Goes et al., 1997).
The McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica, is the driest and coldest desert on
Earth:€air temperature averages −20 °C, and the area practically lacks snow and
ice cover since precipitation is < 5â•›cm water equivalent annually and the wind
speed can exceed 300 km h−1. Wind-transported microfauna was collected (at
77°S, 162°E) by traps and from debris deposited on ice:€ 10 nematodes (of three
species:€ Eudorylaimus antarcticus, Plectus antarcticus and Scottnema lindsayae,
all Antarctic endemites) along with 82 tardigrades and 105 rotifers were found,
on average, in 100 g of wind-transported soil. No microarthropods were present
(Nkem et al., 2006). It is interesting to note that the inland nunataks of Ellsworth
Land (at 75°–77°S, 70°–73°W) is the only known large area without nematodes:€the
sole existing metazoans are rotifers and tardigrades (Freckman and Virginia,
1997; Convey and McInnes, 2005). Similar nunataks with rotifer and tardigrade
diversity, but devoid of nematodes, were found in an area at 73°–75°S, 11°–14°W
(Sohlenius and Boström, 2005).
Water is another important dispersal mean for nematodes. Agriculturally polluted irrigation canals in south central Washington contain 150–16â•›000 nematodes
per cubic metre of water; these were mainly free-living but there were also 5–12%
of plant parasites:€ it was calculated that 2–16â•›×â•›109 nematodes per day were carried past a given point (Faulkner and Bolander, 1966, 1970). Densities of 50–222
nematodes per cubic metre were found in some irrigation canals in southern Italy
(Roccuzzo and Ciancio, 1991). In northern Italy near Milan, about 300 million
nematodes per day are drifted by the River Adda:€38 of the 40 identified species are
typical of fresh water, the commonest nematode being Paroigolaimella bernensis
(Zullini, unpublished data). Nematodes have been found to be dispersed via tap
water:€ data from nine different papers record 1–41 nematode species present in
drinking water, and about 0–156 individuals per litre (Dózsa-Farkas, 1965; Mott
and Harrison, 1983; Lupi et al., 1994).
u b i q u i t y o f m i c r o s c o p i c a n i m a l s?
Phoresy seems to be much less important for free-living nematode dispersal. Their association with other animals can be internal (e.g. reproductive
tract or trachea) or external. Nematodes involved are mainly Rhabditomorpha
(Caenorhabditis species included), Diplogasteromorpha and Tylenchomorpha
(Gaugler and Bilgrami, 2004). Internal phoresy (in the genital chamber) on certain
Diptera and Coleoptera is physiologically obligatory for some, e.g. Paroigolaimella
coprophila (Kiontke, 1996). An example of external phoresy is the transport of
Rhabditophanes schneideri on the legs and pedipalps of pseudoscorpions (Curčic
et al., 2004). More important is the transport via large mammals. It was observed
that the Great Plains (large region extending from Canada to the Mexican border)
hosts an almost identical nematode faunal diversity from north to south along its
3200â•›k m. This region was, until 1870, inhabited by about 50–100 million American
bisons; these roamed the Plains for thousands of years. They would often wallow
in mud to protect themselves from swarms of flies:€in this way they could carry
around 5–20 kg of soil containing, of course, a lot of nematodes. These bisons would
transport millions of tonnes of soil; such movement of mud has made for a uniform
nematode diversity across the vast region (Thorne, 1968). At present, moreover, the
anthropogenic transport of plants and soil is more frequent than ever.
All the factors mentioned above involving nematode dispersal can explain why
many nematode species are cosmopolitan or nearly so. Nematode cosmopolitanism was in fact assumed as a general rule, but the bulk of new data suggests an
alternate view, even if the existence of small-area endemism (like those observed
for insects and terrestrial gastropods) has not yet been proved.
Sohlenius (1980), examining data from 81 sites encompassing the principal
biomes, found that the abundance of soil nematodes was higher in temperate
than in tropical or in cold regions (Fig 13.5A). His data were only indicative, given
the few sites examined in tropical soils and the different methods used to extract
nema�todes. Examining this work and all the existing biogeographic literature,
Procter (1984, 1990) published two papers asserting the following points:
(1) Nematode species richness, in contrast with the general rule valid for most
animals and plants, reaches its maximum at higher latitudes. For example,
a comparison of 18 soil samples gives an average of 81 species (range 33–162)
in the tundra habitats, 56 species (31–95) in temperate grassland and forest
habitats and 18 species (12–24) in tropical habitats.
(2) Genus Plectus is dominant, or nearly so, in high-latitude faunas, whereas it is
insignificant in temperate and tropical areas. Other dominant genera in high
latitudes include Tylenchus, Dorylaimus, Eudorylaimus and Teratocephalus.
The same genera dominate at high altitudes.
(3) Nematode densities and biomass are both high at high altitudes, whereas
they are very low in the tropical forests.
263
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Stress: 0
B
A
Biwa
millions of individuals/m2
264
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
grassland
temperate
forest
Eucalyptus
tundra
Balaton
taiga
Baikal
Ohrid
tropical
forest
Issyk-Kul
Stress: 0.12
C
Ge
Ca
It
Ru
Sp
CR
Leman
SA
Ch
D
CR
Bk
Po
Mo
Hi
Oh
Is
Ch
Ba
It
SpRuGe
Po
Le
Mo
Ca
SA
Bw
Et
Hi
Et Stress: 0.14
Fig 13.5 (A) Average density of soil nematodes (million individuals per square metre)
in different biomes. Drawn from Sohlenius (1980) data. (B) MDS (multidimensional
scaling) scatterplot of six lakes well known from the nematological point of view.
(C) MDS scatterplot of freshwater regional nematofauna. America (Ca:€Canada +
USA; CR:€Costa Rica), Europe (Ge:€Germany + Austria; It:€Italy; Ru:€European Russia;
Po:€Poland; Sp:€Spain), Asia (Ch:€China; Mo:€Mongolian waters <╛5 per thousand salinity;
Hi:€Himalayas), Africa (SA:€South Africa; Et:€Ethiopia). (D) MDS scatterplot of freshwater
regional nematofauna (abbreviations as before) encircling groups of five Asian faunas,
two American and two African faunas, plus the nematofauna of six lakes (Bk:€Baikal;
Ba:€Balaton; Bw:€Biwa; Is:€Issyk-Kul; Le:€Léman; Oh:€Ohrid). European fauna not
encircled.
(4) At high latitudes many nematodes species (e.g. of Plectus, Eudorylaimus and
Dorylaimus) are unusually large.
(5) Antarctic regions have lower nematode richness than do Arctic regions.
Since nematodes tolerate unfavourable conditions such as freezing and desiccation by means of an intermittent activity, Procter (1984) considers nematodes an invertebrate analogue of lichens (but see Chapter 10 for a detailed
discussion on lichen biogeography). Moreover many nematodes, being often
parthenogenetic (e.g. Plectus), can reproduce in habitats being very poor in
nutrients, permitting only low population densities. The compelling short distance between individuals, usually necessary for sexual encounters, is not a
u b i q u i t y o f m i c r o s c o p i c a n i m a l s?
limiting factor for parthenogenetic nematodes. Procter’s final interpretation of
the above-mentioned facts was that most microfauna (mites, springtails, etc.),
usually very active in tropical soils, are hindered in the cold climates owing
to the arthropods’ higher ecological requirements. Consequently nematodes
experience little competition and therefore can maintain relatively high diversities and densities.
The rule that nematodes are larger in cold climates is often, but not always, confirmed:€for example, the largest known species of Tobrilus (sensu lato) was found
on Mount Kenya (T. elephas:€almost 7â•›m m long), and many relatively large nematodes were found in the Himalayas from 5200 to 6100 m above sea level (Andrássy,
1964; Zullini, 1973). Boag and Yeates (1998), examining the existing literature on
134 soil samples at different sites across the world, found that soil nematode biodiversity is lower near the poles than in temperate and tropical regions. In particular, they found minimum values of species at 20°–30° latitude (north plus south)
and at 60°–80° latitude, thus contradicting the suggestion of Procter (1984) about
the scarce tropical nematode biodiversity.
The assessment of geographic patterns in nematodes is difficult for three reasons. First of all, the free-living species of many regions are understudied; only
in Europe, and in some parts of India, is nematode diversity sufficiently known.
Second, there are generally poor taxonomic descriptions of many species erected
before 1950. The last reason is the yet unclear taxonomic relevance of nematode
morphological variability:€ for example, Dorylaimus stagnalis and Monhystera
stagnalis are species reported from lakes and rivers all over the world, but it is
probable that these names include, in fact, a large complex of similar, but different species. Molecular analyses will perhaps resolve this and many other similar
problems.
Despite these problems, it seems that some geographic patterns are evident.
In 1964 Andrássy named Africa ‘das Land der Actinolaimen’. In fact this family
(whose species inhabit fresh water, moss and humid soil) containing 132 valid species, includes only two real cosmopolitan species. Africa hosts the largest number
of Actinolaimidae (30%), followed by India (25%) and by Neotropic regions (23%).
In total, 84% of the species of this family are known for the Gondwanian regions
only. In 1970 Dao compared the two, at that time, best-known temperate and tropical soil faunas:€ the nematodes of the Netherlands (362 species) and Venezuela
(113 species). Excluding the doubtful species and the Venezuelan non-tropical
records (nematodes from above 1200 m), only 5% of the considered species were
really eurytopic, i.e. common to both temperate and tropical areas. Loof (1971), in
the same years, examined almost 25â•›000 nematodes from Spitzbergen (78°–79°N)
and concluded that some genera (Tylenchus, Teratocephalus, Cervidellus, Plectus,
Ereptonema, Prismatolaimus) are much more dominant on Spitzbergen than in
the temperate regions. A surprising fact was the complete absence of Rhabditidae,
265
266
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Diplogastridae, Mononchidae and Aporcelaimidae (less surprising was the
absence of some families of plant parasitic nematodes). The Spitzbergen nematofauna was found to be very similar to that of northern Canada, Greenland and
Novaya Zemlya.
The biogeography of freshwater species has received much less attention and
thus entails many unsolved problems. One puzzling case is given by the nematodes living in freshwater habitats in the Galápagos archipelago:€two of the 18 collected species were new, six were widely distributed in the southern hemisphere,
and the remaining 10 were cosmopolitan. Since Galápagos are remote volcanic
(therefore oceanic) islands 960 km away from the South American coast, the most
likely vector of these nematodes, obviously in resistant stages, is the passive and
very occasional transport by birds (Eyualem-Abebe and Coomans, 1995). The
ability of freshwater nematodes to withstand harsh conditions, including long�distance transport, is illustrated by Hodda et al. (2006). The most dominant species
in Alpine lakes are also cosmopolitan, but a survey on these lakes found that only
three species (Eumonhystera filiformis, E. longicaudatula and Tripyla glomerans)
were found in all the studied lakes (Traunspurger et al., 2006). Eyualem-Abebe
et€al. (2008) published an interesting paper on the global diversity of freshwater
nematodes. They pointed out that this group of nematodes is only 7% of all the
nominal nematode species and discussed the geographic distribution of the
nematode orders including free-living species.
To find possible geographic patterns in freshwater nematodes, 102 papers
and species lists from 1913 to 2003 were examined. After some taxonomic corrections, 717 nominal species were found; only strictly freshwater nematodes
were considered, excluding the Tylenchomorpha (most of them being plantparasitic). Comparing nematodes of six biogeographically important and
well-studied lakes (Baikal:€ the most ancient lake and the richest in endemics; Balaton:€ a remnant of Paratethys; Biwa:€ the largest Japanese freshwater
lake; Leman:€the largest Alpine lake; Issyk-Kul + Sonkul:€the largest endorheic
lake; Ohrid:€ the most ancient European lake) by means of multidimensional
scaling, a good propinquity (stress = 0) connects the three European lakes,
whereas Baikal is placed well apart from all other lakes (Fig 13.5B). A wellstudied lake for nematodes is the Königssee (Traunspurger, 1991), but in the
following diagrams it is omitted since its placements practically coincide with
the Léman:€ this means that these two Alpine lakes, whose distance apart is
exactly 500 km, are extremely similar in their nematode fauna. Comparing the
freshwater nematodes at the regional level (excluding the data of the abovementioned lakes, and including rivers and other lakes), four distinct groups,
at a continental level, emerge (Fig 13.5C). By including all data together
(regional data plus the data of the six lakes) the following pattern emerges (Fig
13.5D):€European faunas are well grouped together, excluding Ohrid (pliocenic
u b i q u i t y o f m i c r o s c o p i c a n i m a l s?
lake rich in unusual species) and Baikal, of which the latter is placed in an isolated position (Zullini, unpubl. data).
All these data prove that both the soil and the freshwater species (or freshwater
groups of species) are not distributed randomly in the world.
It is one thing to discover natural patterns and it is another to tentatively
intepret them. In our case, interpretation is based upon the distinction between
environmental (ecological) and historical (evolutionary) factors:€ for the small
eukaryotes, in particular, declaring that some ‘species’ are cosmopolitan might
be approximately equivalent to saying that a genus or family of birds is cosmopolitan (Martiny et al., 2006). The concept of ‘small’ animal, and of the related microfauna concept, usually refers to the body length (generally defined as <â•›2â•›m m), but
many soil and freshwater nematodes are outside the 2â•›m m length, and yet still
remain within the frame of the microfauna. Therefore the maximum threshold
(2â•›m m) should refer to the maximum body width and not to the body length. The
geographic distribution of nematode species attacking roots of cultivated plants
has been investigated (e.g. Navas et al., 1993; Coomans, 1996). Biogeographic analyses on soil free-living species were made by Ferris et al. (1976, 1981) adopting a
plate tectonics perspective and using cladistic analysis. They analysed the family
Leptonchidae because these hyphal and omnivorous feeders do not have cryptobiotic ability and their geographic distribution is rather clear. The genus Tyleptus,
in particular, was regarded as a Gondwanian genus, except for one species present in Venezuela and in North America, which probably migrated northwards
via the Central America land bridge. All other genera of this family radiated primarily in Gondwana areas, except Funaria which is of Laurasian origin. The fact
that one of the cladograms (about Tyleptus) published by these authors presents
species/continental area correspondences, could raise strong objections by many
biogeographers, as a species level is generally considered a too low systematic
level (= recent origin) to be correlated with the ancient tectonic splits. However,
we must remember that species evolution in nematodes has a different pace:€for
example, the free-living soil nematodes Caenorhabditis elegans and C. briggsae
(whose genome sequences were completed in 2002 and 2003, respectively) are
morphologically almost indistinguishable, despite the fact that their most recent
common ancestor existed about a 100 million years ago (Hillier et al., 2007).
In conclusion, it is still not clear what kind of geographic pattern is really true
and important for the continental free-living nematodes, nor if there is a geographic parallelism between the soil and the freshwater species, nor if vicariance
or dispersion are the main biogeographic factors. We can only foresee that new
field collections and DNA data, that many laboratories are collecting with a constantly increasing speed, will permit us to define a picture of nematode distribution and history; one which is vaster and more correct than any we can conceive
at present.
267
268
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
13.7╇ Flatworms
(Tom Artois)
Flatworms (Platyhelminthes) are a species-rich group of acoelomate, soft-�bodied,
protostome animals (over 20â•›000 species described). Traditionally they were
subdiv�ided into the parasitic Neodermata (c. 15╛000 species) and the free-living
or symbiotic ‘Turbellaria’ (c. 6500 species), this group included all the flatworms
that do not replace the ciliated epidermis with a non-ciliated one (the so-called
neodermis) during ontogenetic development. Phylogenetic analyses, based on
molecular as well as morphological data, have made clear that ‘Turbellaria’ is
not monophyletic (see Willems et al., 2006 and references therein). However, the
term turbellarian is still commonly used as a vernacular name to indicate all non�parasitic free-living flatworms.
Until recently, four large taxa were recognised within Platyhelminthes:€Acoela,
Nemertodermatida, Catenulida and Rhabditophora (including Neodermata).
However, it is clear now that Acoela and Nemertodermatida do not belong to
the monophyletic Platyhelminthes, but are basal bilaterians (Hejnol et al., 2010).
Here we will restrict the term microturbellaria to all species of the Catenulida
and Rhabditophora that are free-living or symbiotic, and are less than a few
milli�metres in length (Fig 13.6). Hence Neodermata, triclads (planarians) and
polyclads are not treated. Defined as such, microturbellaria includes about
3300 species. Microturbellaria all are simultaneous hermaphrodites, which
Fig 13.6 Two microturbellarians from India, December 2008. (A) Trigonostomum franki
(marine) and (B) a new species of Dalyelliidae (freshwater). Scale bars 0.1â•›m m.
u b i q u i t y o f m i c r o s c o p i c a n i m a l s?
(probably) mostly cross-fertilise, although self-fertilisation can occur (Sekera,
1906). They have a direct development, without any free-living larvae. An overview of the world’s distribution of freshwater turbellaria was recently provided
by Schockaert et al. (2008). As yet, a worldwide review of marine turbellaria is
not available.
Microturbellarians can be found in all types of wet environments all over
the world:€streams, ponds, salt marshes, sandy and rocky beaches and different
kinds of sublittoral environments. They either live interstitially between the sand
grains, epiphytically on algae and/or plants, or epizoically, e.g. on cnidarians and
bryozoans. Whereas most turbellarians need wet habitats, about 50 species can
occur in moist terrestrial environments. Very few species are described from dry
envir�onments (desiccated mosses), but recent collections have shown that at least
rhabdocoel flatworms are ubiquitous in these temporarily dry environments (Van
Steenkiste et al., 2010). These terrestrial rhabdocoels survive periods of extreme
drought by encystment, often after the deposition of one or two eggs. A few days
after excystment, the worms start laying eggs (for details, see Van Steenkiste et al.,
2010). Encystment by adult worms, to survive adverse conditions, has also been
reported in freshwater lecithoepitheliates and the freshwater species Bothrioplana
semperi (see Luther, 1960). A number of limnic species produce resting eggs,
which can survive periods of drought or cold. For example, mature specimens of
five species of rhabdocoels were collected a few days after inundation of sediment
containing resting eggs from a dried-out pool in Botswana (Artois et al., 2004).
Such resting eggs have been reported from many taxa:€Catenulida (Hyman, 1951),
Macrostomida (Graff, 1913; Ingole, 1987), and Rhabdocoela (Graff, 1913; Luther,
1955; Young, 1974; Heitkamp, 1988).
Very little is known about the dispersal capacities of microturbellaria. Cases of
worms in rafting material (such as coconuts, seaweeds, drifting algae and plants,
driftwood) have been reported (Gerlach, 1977); this could be a major source of dispersal of the adult (and juvenile) worms, and of eggs. In polar areas, drifting sea
ice could be an important carrier of flatworms. For acoels it has been known for
a long time that they can survive in sea ice (see Gradinger et al., 1999; Janssen
and Gradinger, 1999 and references therein; Friedrich and Hendelberg, 2001),
and recently rhabditophorans have been discovered in the sea ice endofauna of
the Weddell Sea (Melnikov, 1997; M. Kramer, personal communication). Worms
as well as eggs could be displaced by animals that regularly visit moist habitats,
such as waterfowl (Steinböck, 1931). Resting stages of limnic species, such as cysts
and resting eggs, could be important stages for airborne or phoretic dispersal
(Reisinger and Steinböck, 1927; Young and Young, 1976; Vanschoenwinkel et al.,
2008a, 2008b, 2009). In a recent study, Vanschoenwinkel et al. (2008c) found a relatively high number of viable turbellarian propagules in the faeces of wild boars,
and in mud from rubbing trees used by these animals, which indicates that large
269
270
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
mammal activity could be an important means of dispersal. Moreover, flooding
has been shown to be important for the dispersal of microturbellarian resting
stages (Vanschoenwinkel et al., 2008a). For interstitial marine microturbellarians,
sand displacement by wave action and sea currents can be a means of egg and
individual worm dispersal, which, together with the sand, are swept from their
original location and deposited in a new location (Boaden, 1964, 1968). Moreover,
and somewhat surprisingly, microturbellarians (and other meiofauna) are readily
displaced while suspended in the water column (Palmer, 1988). They can enter
the water column by accident, as a consequence of heavy wave actions, but they
can also enter it actively. In an experiment carried out by Hagerman and Rieger
(1981), specimens of several flatworm taxa, along with some other meiofauna taxa
(predominantly nematodes), were retrieved from a meiofauna trap that was suspended in the water column. As such they can be dispersed by water currents,
and colonise new areas. When mature, flatworms often carry one or more eggs, or
have viable sperm stored from previous copulations, which can be used to fertilise
eggs. Moreover, self-fertilisation can occur, although seldom does (Sekera, 1906).
By these means, one individual can be responsible for the colonisation of a new
locality. In more recent times, anthropogenic introduction of microturbellarians
in new localities has occurred, for instance by the use of large bodies of sediment
as counter ballast in sailing ships, or by the (international) trade of fauna and flora
(Young and Young, 1976; Gerlach, 1977; Faubel and Gollasch, 1996).
Although the above-mentioned means of dispersal undoubtedly occur, it is far
from clear how much these processes have influenced present-day distribution
of microturbellaria. According to some authors, there are almost no boundaries
to the spread of small interstitial animals, whereas others consider continental
drift to be the major historical cause of the present-day distribution of these animals; the processes discussed above are only responsible for intracontinental
rather than intercontinental dispersal (reviewed by Sterrer, 1973). At least the latter option seems conceivable for freshwater turbellarians; for these animals, large
marine waters constitute an unbridgeable biogeographic barrier.
Based on the data sets compiled in the framework of the FADA-project (Balian
et al., 2008; data set not publicly available yet), we calculated that about 50–80%
(depending on the taxon considered) of the freshwater species are known from
their type locality and the nearby vicinity only. Based on the data available in the
Turbellarian taxonomic database (Tyler et al., 2006–2009) and on our own field
experiences, the situation is comparable for the marine taxa. These high numbers
of species with restricted distributions are reflective of our lack of knowledge as
to the real distributions, rather than indicative of high levels of endemicity. In
Europe, for instance, most species generally show a much wider distribution than
species known from other continents; occurring in comparable habitats on the
entire continent (including Russia). The obvious reason is sampling bias, since
u b i q u i t y o f m i c r o s c o p i c a n i m a l s?
most flatworm taxonomists in the past have been European, sampling predominantly in their own ‘backyard’. Only Lake Baikal seems to be a real hotspot of
microturbellarian endemicity (Schockaert et al., 2008).
On the other hand, there are many examples of species with a very disparate distribution. For instance, Plagiostomum acoluthum (Prolecithophora) is known from
Hawai’i and Brazil (Karling et al., 1972), Annalisella bermudensis (Rhabdocoela) is
recorded from Bermuda, Curaçao and Zanzibar (Artois and Tessens, 2008); these
are but a few of numerous examples. More specifically, many species are known
from localities in the European Northern Atlantic (Scandinavian and German
Coast), the Mediterranean and Black Sea, and often the North American Atlantic
Coast. Not coincidentally, these are the most densely sampled areas. Therefore,
one could easily state that distribution maps of species of microturbellaria actually reflect the distributions of taxonomists, and the expeditions they have done.
Without doubt, denser sampling will show that many species actually have a much
wider distribution than is thought now.
In almost all taxa there are species that have an extremely wide or even cosmopolitan distribution. The most renowned example is Gyratrix hermaphroditus
(Rhabdocoela). This ‘species’ occurs in freshwater, marine and brackish water
habitats from the north pole to the south pole. However, populations (sometimes
sympatric) can differ in the number of chromosomes, the morphology of the chromosomes and the detailed morphology and dimensions of the hard parts of the
copulatory organ. This variation can even be found within populations. To what
extent these differences indicate reproductive isolation and/or evolutionary differentiation is unknown, but it is clear that Gyratrix hermaphroditus represent a
complex of species (see Curini-Galletti and Puccinelli, 1998; Timoshkin et al., 2004
and references therein). Most other ‘cosmopolitan species’ often belong to taxa in
which species identification is extremely difficult (e.g. some species of Mesostoma,
several taxa within Typhloplanidae, some species of Macrostomum, many species
of Catenulida, etc.). A detailed molecular and morphological study of these taxa is
certainly necessary to indicate whether these species are indeed cosmopolitan, or
whether they form complexes of many cryptic taxa. The molecular study of cryptic
biodiversity, however, has only very recently been started (e.g. Casu and CuriniGalletti, 2006).
It is clear that, at present, too few data are available to make any definitive inferences about patterns of distributions in microturbellaria. On one hand, it is clear
that many species probably have a much wider distribution than is now known.
On the other hand, many cosmopolitan species could represent complexes of sibling species, each with a much narrower distribution. Only intensive sampling,
a combination of molecular and morphology-based taxonomy and experimental
laboratory and field studies on the dispersal capacities of microturbellarians, will
give a realistic image of their distribution patterns.
271
272
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
References
Andrássy, I. (1964). SüsswasserNematoden aus den grossen
Gebirgsgegenden Ostafrikas. Acta
Zoologica, Budapest 10, 1–59.
Artois, T., Tessens, B. (2008).
Polycystididae (Rhabditophora:
Rhabdocoela:€Kalyptorhynchia) from
the Indian Ocean, with the description
of twelve new species. Zootaxa 1849,
1–27.
Artois, T., Willems, W., De Roeck,
E., Jocqué, M., Brendonck, L.
(2004). Freshwater Rhabdocoela
(Platyhelminthes) from ephemeral
rock pools from Botswana, with the
description of four new species and
one new genus. Zoological Science 21,
1063–1072.
Baker, J.M., Giribet, G. (2007). A molecular
phylogenetic approach to the phylum
Cycliophora provides further evidence
for cryptic speciation in Symbion
americanus. Zoologica Scripta 36,
353–359.
Baker, J.M., Funch, P., Giribet, G. (2007).
Cryptic speciation in the recently
discovered American cycliophoran
Symbion americanus; genetic structure
and population expansion. Marine
Biology 151, 2183–2193.
Balian, E.V., Segers, H., Lévêque, C.,
Martens, K. (2008). Freshwater
animal diversity assessment:€an
introduction to the Freshwater Animal
Diversity Assessment (FADA) project.
Hydrobiologia 595, 3–8.
Ball, I.R. (1976). Nature and formulation
of biogeographical hypothesis.
Systematic Zoology 24, 407–430.
Balsamo, M. (1992) Hermaphroditism
and parthenogenesis in lower
Bilateria:€Gnathostomulida and
Gastrotricha. In Dallai, R. (ed.), Sex
Origin and Evolution, pp. 309–327.
Modena:€Mucchi editore.
Balsamo, M., Todaro, M.A. (1988). Life
history traits of two chaetonotids
(Gastrotricha) under different
experimental conditions. Invertebrate
Reproduction and Development 14,
161–176.
Balsamo, M., d’Hondt, J.-L., Kisielewski,
J., Pierboni, L. (2008). Global diversity
of gastrotrichs (Gastrotricha) in fresh
waters. Hydrobiologia 595, 85–91.
Balsamo, M., d’Hondt, J.-L., Pierboni,
L., Grilli, P. (2009). Taxonomic and
nomenclatural notes on freshwater
Gastrotricha. Zootaxa 2158, 1–19.
Baujard, P., Martiny, B. (1994). Transport
of nematodes by wind in the peanut
cropping area of Senegal, West Africa.
Fundamental and Applied Nematology
17, 543–550.
Bertolani, R. (1982). Cytology and
reproductive mechanisms in
tardigrades. In Nelson, D.R. (ed.),
Proceedings of the Third International
Symposium on the Tardigrada, pp.
93–114. August 3–6, 1980, Johnson
City, Tennessee. Johnson City, TN:€East
Tennessee State University Press.
Bertolani, R. (1987) Sexuality,
reproduction, and propagation in
tardigrades. In Bertolani, R. (ed.),
Biology of Tardigrades. Selected
Symposia and Monographs UZI 1,
93–101.
Bertolani, R., Grimaldi, D. (2000). A New
Eutardigrade (Tardigrada:€Milnesiidae)
in amber from the Upper Cretaceous
(Turonian) of New Jersey. In Grimaldi,
D. (ed.), Studies on Fossils in Amber,
with Particular Reference to the
u b i q u i t y o f m i c r o s c o p i c a n i m a l s?
Cretaceous of New Jersey, pp. 103–110.
Leiden:€Backhuys Publishers.
Bertolani, R., Rebecchi, L. (1993). A
revision of the Macrobiotus hufelandi
group (Tardigrada, Macrobiotidae),
with some observations on the
taxonomic characters of eutardigrades.
Zoologica Scripta 22, 127–152.
Bertolani, R., Rebecchi, L. (1999).
Tardigrada. In Knobil, E., Neill, J.D.
(eds.), Encyclopedia of Reproduction,
Vol. 4, pp. 703–718. San Diego,
CA:€Academic Press.
Binda, M.G., Kristensen, R.M. (1986). Notes
on the genus Oreella (Oreellidae) and
the systematic position of Carphania
fluviatilis Binda, 1978 (Carphanidae
fam. nov., Heterotardigrada). Animalia
13, 9–20.
Boaden, P.J.S. (1964). Grazing in the
interstitial habitat:€a review. In
Crisp, D.J. (ed.), Grazing in terrestrial
and marine environments. British
Ecological Society Symposium 4,
299–303.
Boaden, P.J.S. (1968). Water movement€– a
dominant factor in interstitial ecology.
Sarsia 34, 125–136.
Boag, B., Yeates, G.W. (1998). Soil
nematode biodiversity in terrestrial
ecosystems. Biodiveristy and
Conservation 7, 617–630.
Carroll, J.J., Viglierchio, D.R. (1981). On the
transport of nematodes by the wind.
Journal of Nematology 13, 476–482.
Casu, M., Curini-Galletti, M.
(2006). Genetic evidence for the
existence of cryptic species in
the mesopsammic flatworm
Pseudomonocelis ophiocephala
(Rhabditophora:€Proseriata). Biological
Journal of the Linnean Society 87,
553–576.
Claxton, S.K. (1998). A revision
of the genus Minibiotus
(Tardigrada:€Macrobiotidae) with
descriptions of eleven new species
from Australia. Records of the
Australian Museum 50, 125–160.
Convey, P., McInnes, S. (2005). Exceptional
tardigrade-dominated ecosystems in
Ellsworth Land, Antarctica. Ecology
86, 519–527.
Coomans, A. (1996). Phylogeny of the
Longidoridae. Russian Journal of
Nematology 4, 51–60.
Cooper, K.W. (1964). The first fossil
tardigrade:€Beorn leggi Cooper, from
Cretaceous amber. Psyche 71, 41–48.
Cromer, L., Gibson, J.A.E., Swadling,
K.M., Hodgson, D.A. (2006). Evidence
for a lacustrine faunal refuge in the
Larsemann Hills, East Antarctica,
during the Last Glacial Maximum.
Journal of Biogeography 33, 1314–1323.
Cromer, L., Gibson, J.A.E., McInnes, S.J.,
Agius, J.T. (2008). Tardigrade remains
from lake sediments. Journal of
Paleolimnology 39, 143–150.
Curčic, B.P.M., Sudhaus, W.,
Dimitrijevic, R.N. (2004). Phoresy of
Rhabditophanes schneideri (Bütschli)
(Rhabditida:€Alloionematidae)
on pseudoscorpiones
(Arachnida:€Pseudoscorpiones).
Nematology 6, 313–317.
Curini-Galletti, M.C., Puccinelli,€I.
(1998). The Gyratix
hermaphroditus species complex
(Kalyptorynchia:€Polycystididae) in
marine habitats of eastern Australia.
Hydrobiologia 383, 287–298.
Dao, F. (1970). Climatic influence on the
distribution pattern of plant parasitic
and soil inhabiting nematodes.
Mededelingen Landbouwhogenschool
Wageningen 70, 1–181.
De Ridder, M. (1981). Some considerations
on the geographic distribution of
rotifers. Hydrobiologia 85, 209–225.
273
274
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
de RooiJ-van der Goes, P.C.E.M., van Dijk,
C., van der Putten, W.H, Jungerius,
P.D. (1997). Effects of sand movement
by wind on nematodes and soil-borne
fungi in coastal foredunes. Journal of
Coastal Conservation 3, 133–142.
De Smet, W.H. (2002). A new record of
Limnognathia maerski Kristensen &
Funch, 2000 (Micrognathozoa) from
the subantarctic Crozet Islands, with
redescription of the trophi. Journal of
Zoology 258, 381–393.
Degma, P., Guidetti, R. (2007). Notes to
the current checklist of Tardigrada.
Zootaxa 1579, 41–53.
Dózsa-Farkas, K. (1965). Untersuhungen
über die Fauna des Budapester
Leitungswassers, mit besonderer
Berücksichtigung der Nematoden.
Opuscola Zoologica, Budapest 5,
173–181.
Dumont, H.J. (1980). Workshop on
taxonomy and biogeography.
Hydrobiologia 73, 205–206.
Dumont, H.J. (1983). Biogeography of
rotifers. Hydrobiologia 104, 19–30.
Dumont, H., Segers, H. (1996). Estimating
lacustrine zooplankton species
richness and complementarity.
Hydrobiologia 341, 125–132.
Ettema, C.H., Wardle, D. (2002). Spatial
soil ecology. Trends in Ecology and
Evolution 17, 177–183.
Euyalem-Abebe, Coomans, A. (1995).
Freshwater nematodes of the
Galápagos. Hydrobiologia 299, 1–51.
Eyualem-Abebe, Decraemer, W., De
Ley, P. (2008). Global diversity of
nematodes (Nematoda) in freshwater.
Hydrobiologia 595, 67–78.
Faubel, A., Gollasch, S. (1996).
Cryptostylochus hullensis sp.
nov. (Polycladida, Acotylea,
Platyhelminthes):€a possible case of
transoceanic dispersal on a ship’s hull.
Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen 50,
533–537.
Faulkner, L.R., Bolander, W.J. (1966).
Occurrence of large nematode
populations in irrigation canals
in South Central Washington.
Nematologica 12, 591–600.
Faulkner, L.R., Bolander, W.J. (1970).
Agriculturally-polluted irrigation
water as a source of plant-parasitic
nematode infestation. Journal of
Nematology 2, 368–374.
Fenchel, T., Finlay, B.J. (2004). The ubiquity
of small species:€patterns of local and
global diversity. Bioscience 54, 777–784.
Ferris, V.R., Goseco, C.G., Ferris, J.M.
(1976). Biogeography of free-living soil
nematodes from the perspective of
plate tectonics. Science 193, 508–510.
Ferris, V.R., Ferris, J.M., Goseco, C.G.
(1981). Phylogenetic and biogeographic
hypotheses in Leptonchidae
(Nematoda:€Dorylaimida) and a new
classification. Proceedings of the
Helminthological Society, Washington
48, 163–171.
Foissner, W. (2006). Biogeography and
dispersal of micro-organisms:€a
review emphasizing protists. Acta
Protozoologica 45, 111–136.
Fontaneto, D., Melone, G. (2003).
Redescription of Pleuretra hystrix,
an endemic alpine bdelloid rotifer.
Hydrobiologia 497, 153–160.
Fontaneto, D., Ficetola, G.F., Ambrosini,€R.,
Ricci, C. (2006). Patterns of diversity
in microscopic animals:€are they
comparable to those in protists or in
larger animals? Global Ecology and
Biogeography 15, 153–162.
Fontaneto, D., Herniou, E.A., Barraclough,
T.G., Ricci C. (2007). On the global
distribution of microscopic
u b i q u i t y o f m i c r o s c o p i c a n i m a l s?
animals:€new worldwide data on
bdelloid rotifers. Zoological Studies 46,
336–346.
Fontaneto, D., Kaya, M., Herniou,€E.A.,
Barraclough, T.G. (2009). Extreme
levels of hidden diversity in
microscopic animals (Rotifera)
revealed by DNA taxonomy. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 53,
182–189.
Freckman, D.W., Virginia, R.A. (1997).
Low-diversity Antarctic soil nematode
communities:€distribution and
response to disturbance. Ecology 78,
363–369.
Friedrich, C., Hendelberg, J. (2001). On the
ecology of Acoela living in the Arctic
Sea ice. Belgian Journal of Zoology 131
(Supplement 1), 213–216.
Funch, P., Kristensen, R.M. (1995).
Cycliophora is a new phylum
with affinities to Entoprocta and
Ectoprocta. Nature 378, 711–714.
Funch, P., Kristensen, R.M. (1997).
Cycliophora. In Harrison, F.W.,
Woollacott, R.M. (eds.), Microscopic
Anatomy of Invertebrates, Vol. 13.
Lophophorates, Entoprocta, and
Cycliophora, pp. 409–474. New York,
NY:€Wiley-Liss.
Gad, G. (2005a). Successive reduction
of the last instar larva of Loricifera,
as evidenced by two new species
of Pliciloricus from the Great
Meteor Seamount (Atlantic Ocean).
Zoologischer Anzeiger 243, 239–271.
Gad, G. (2005b). Giant Higgins-larvae with
paedogenetic reproduction from the
deep sea of the Angola Basin€– evidence
for a new life cycle and for abyssal
gigantism in Loricifera? Organisms,
Diversity and Evolution 5, 59–75.
Gad, G. (2005c). A parthenogenetic,
simplified adult in the life cycle
of Pliciloricus pedicularis sp. n.
(Loricifera) from the deep sea of the
Angola Basin (Atlantic). Organisms,
Diversity and Evolution 5, 77–103.
Gad, G., Martinez Arbizu, P. (2005). First
description of an Arctic Loricifera€– a
new Rugiloricus-species from the
Laptev Sea. Marine Biology Research 1,
313–325.
GaOrdóñez, D., Pardos, F., Benito, J. (2008).
Three new Echinoderes (Kinorhyncha,
Cyclorhagida) from North Spain, with
new evolutionary aspects in the genus.
Zoologischer Anzeiger 247, 95–111.
Gaugler, R., Bilgrami, A.L.
(2004). Nematode Behaviour.
Wallingford:€CABI Publishing.
Gerlach, S.A. (1977). Means of meiofauna
dispersal. Microfauna Meeresboden 61,
89–103.
Goeze, J.A.E. (1773). Über den kleinen
Wasserbär. In Bonnet, K. (ed.),
Abhandlungen aus der Insektologie,
pp. 367–375. Halle:€JJ Gebauers Wittwe
und Joh Jac Gebauer.
Gómez, A., Serra, M., Carvalho, G.R., Lunt,
D.H. (2002). Speciation in ancient
cryptic species complexes:€evidence
from the molecular phylogeny of
Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera).
Evolution 56, 1431–1445.
Gradinger, R., Friedrich, C., Spindler,
M. (1999). Abundance, biomass and
composition of the sea ice biota of
the Greenland sea pack ice. Deep Sea
Research II 46, 1457–1472.
Graff, L. von (1913). Platyhelminthes.
Turbellaria II. Rhabdocoelida. Tierreich
35 II–XX, 1–484.
Green, J. (1972). Latitudinal variations in
associations of planktonic rotifers.
Journal of Zoology 167, 31–39.
Guidetti, R., Bertolani, R. (2005).
Tardigrade taxonomy:€an updated
275
276
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
check list of the taxa and a list of
characters for their identification.
Zootaxa 845, 1–46.
Hagerman, G.M., Rieger, R.M. (1981).
Dispersal of benthic meiofauna by
wave and current action in Bogue
Sound, N.C., USA. PSZN Marine
Ecology 2, 245–270.
Heiner, I. (2004). Armorloricus kristenseni
(Nanaloricidae, Loricifera), a new
species from the Faroe Bank (north
Atlantic). Helgoland Marine Research
58, 192–205.
Heiner, I. (2008). Rugiloricus bacatus
sp. nov. (Loricifera€– Pliciloricidae)
and a ghost-larva with paedogenetic
reproduction. Systematics and
Biodiversity 6, 225–247.
Heiner, I., Boesgaard, T.M., Kristensen,
R.M. (2009). First time discovery of
Loricifera from Australian waters and
marine caves. Marine Biology Research
5, 529–546.
Heitkamp, U. (1988). Life-cycles of
microturbellarians of pools and their
strategies of adaptation to their habitats.
Progress in Zoology 36, 449–456.
Hejnol, A., Obst, M., Stamatakis, A. et al.
(2010). Assessing the root of bilaterian
animals with scalable phylogenomic
methods. Proceedings of the Royal
Society B 276, 4261–4270.
Higgins, R.P. (1977). Redescription of
Echinoderes dujardinii (Kinorhyncha)
with descriptions of closely related
species. Contributions to Zoology 248,
1–26.
Higgins, R.P., Kristensen, R.M. (1986). New
Loricifera from Southeastern United
States Coastal Waters. Smithsonian
Contributions to Zoology 438, 1–70.
Hillier, L.W., Miller, R.D., Baird, S.E. et al.
(2007). Comparison of C. elegans and
C. briggsae genome sequence reveals
extensive conservation of chromosome
organization and synteny. PLoS
Biology 5, 1603–1616.
Hochberg, R. (2005). Musculature of
the primitive gastrotrich Neodasys
(Chaetonotida):€Functional
adaptations to the interstitial
environment and phylogenetic
significance. Marine Biology 146,
315–323.
Hodda, M., Ocaña, A., Traunspurger,
W. (2006). Nematodes from extreme
freshwater habitats. In Abebe, E.,
Traunspurgerm, W., Andrássy, I.
(eds.), Freshwater Nematodes:€Ecology
and Taxonomy, pp. 179–210.
Wallingford:€CABI Publishing.
Hugot, J.P., Baujard, P., Morand, S.
(2001). Biodiversity in helminths
and nematodes as a field of study:€an
overview. Nematology 3, 199–208.
Hummon, M.R. (1984). Reproduction
and sexual development in a
freshwater gastrotrich. 1. Oogenesis
of parthenogenic eggs (Gastrotricha).
Zoomorphologie 104, 33–41.
Hummon, W.D. (2008). Gastrotricha of the
North Atlantic Ocean:€1. Twenty four
new and two redescribed species of
Macrodasyida. Meiofauna Marina 16,
117–174.
Hummon, W.D., Todaro, M.A. (2007).
A new species of Xenotrichulidae
(Gastrotricha) from southern and
southeastern USA. Cahiers de Biologie
Marine 48, 297–302.
Hummon, W.D., Todaro, M.A. (2010).
Analytic taxonomy and notes on
marine, brackish-water and estuarine
Gastrotricha. Zootaxa 2392, 1–32.
Hutchinson, G.E. (1967). A Treatise on
Limnology. Vol. II. Introduction to Lake
Biology and the Limnoplankton. New
York, NY:€John Wiley & Sons.
u b i q u i t y o f m i c r o s c o p i c a n i m a l s?
Hyman, L.H. (1951). The Invertebrates.
Platyhelminthes and Rhynchocoela.
The Acoelomate Bilateria, Vol II. New
York, NY:€McGraw-Hill.
Ingole, B.S. (1987). Occurrence of
resting eggs in Macrostomum
orthostylum (M. Braun, 1885)
(Turbellaria:€Macrostomida).
Zoologischer Anzeiger 219, 19–24.
Janiec, K. (1996). Short distance wind
transport of microfauna in maritime
Antarctic (King George Island,
South Shetland Islands). Polish Polar
Research 17, 203–211.
Jankovska, V. (1991). Unbekannte Objekte
in Pollenpräparaten€– Tardigrada. In
Kovar-Eder, J. (ed.), Palaeovegetational
Development in Europe and Regions
Relevant to its Palaeofloristic
Evolution, pp. 19–23. Pan-European
Palaeobotanical Conference, Vienna,
Austria, September.
Janssen, H.H., Gradinger, R. (1999).
Turbellaria (Archoophora:€Acoela)
from Antarctic sea ice
endofauna:€examination of their
micromorphology. Polar Biology 21,
410–416.
Johnston, T.H. (1938). Echinoderida.
Scientific Reports, Ser. C.- Zoology and
Botany. Sydney:€David Harold Paisley,
Government Printer.
Kanneby, T., Todaro, M.A., Jondelius,
U. (2009). One new species and
records of Ichthydium Ehrenberg,
1830 (Gastrotricha:€Chaetonotida)
from Sweden with a key to the genus.
Zootaxa 2278, 26–46.
Karling, T.G., Mack-Fira, V., Dörjes,
J. (1972). First report on marine
microturbellarians from Hawaii.
Zoologica Scripta 1, 251–269.
Kaya, M., De Smet, W.H., Fontaneto,
D. (2010). Survey of moss-dwelling
bdelloid rotifers from middle Arctic
Spitsbergen (Svalbard). Polar Biology
33, 833–842.
Kinchin, I.M. (1994). The Biology of
Tardigrades. Chapel Hill, NC:€Portland
Press.
Kiontke, K. (1996). The phoretic association
of Diplogaster coprophila Sudhaus
& Rehfeld, 1990 (Diplogastridae)
from cow dung with its carriers, in
particular flies of the family Sepsidae.
Nematologica 42, 354–366.
Kisielewski, J. (1991). Inland-water
Gastrotricha from Brazil. Annales
Zoologici (Warsaw) 43 (Suppl. 2), 1–168.
Kisielewski, J. (1999). A preliminary study
of the inland-water Gastrotricha of
Israel. Israel Journal of Zoology 45,
135–157.
Kozloff, E.N. (2007). Stages of development,
from first cleavage to hatching,
of an Echinoderes (Phylum
Kinorhyncha:€Class Cyclorhagida).
Cahiers de Biologie Marine 48, 199–206.
Kristensen, R.M. (1983). Loricifera, a
new phylum with Aschelminthes
characters from the meiobenthos.
Zeitschrift für Zoologische Systematik
und Evolutionsforschung 21, 163–180.
Kristensen, R.M. (1987). Generic revision
of the Echiniscidae (Heterotardigrada),
with a discussion of the origin of the
family. In Bertolani, R. (ed.), Biology
of Tardigrades. Selected Symposia and
Monographs UZI, 1, 261–335.
Kristensen, R.M., Funch, P. (2000).
Micrognathozoa:€A new class with
complicated jaws like those of Rotifera
and Gnathostomulida. Journal of
Morphology 246, 1–49.
Kristensen, R.M., Nørrevang, A. (1977).
On the fine structure of Rastrognathia
macrostoma gen. et sp. n. placed
in Rastrognathiidae fam. n.
(Gnathostomulida). Zoologica Scripta
6, 27–41.
277
278
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Kristensen, R.M., Nørrevang, A. (1978).
On the fine structure of Valvognathia
pogonostoma gen. et sp.n.
(Gnathostomulida, Onychognathiidae)
with special reference to the jaw
apparatus. Zoologica Scripta 7,
179–186.
Kristensen, R.M., Shirayama, Y. (1988).
Pliciloricus hadalis (Pliciloricidae), a
new loriciferan species collected from
the Izu-Ogasawara Trench, Western
Pacific. Zoological Science 5, 875–881.
Krnjaic’, D.J., Krnjaic’, S. (1973). Dispersion
of nematodes by wind. Bollettino del
Laboratorio di Entomologia Agraria F.
Silvestri, Portici 30, 66–70.
Lambshead, J.D. (2004). Marine nematode
biodiversity. In Chen, Z.X., Chen, S.Y.,
Dickson, D.W. (eds.), Nematology,
Advances and Perspectives, Vol. I, pp.
438–468. Cambridge, MA:€Tsinghua
University Press and CABI Publishing.
Leasi, F., Todaro, M. A. (2009). Meiofaunal
cryptic species revealed by confocal
microscopy:€the case of Xenotrichula
intermedia (Gastrotricha). Marine
Biology 156, 1335–1346.
Leasi, F., Todaro, M.A. (2010). The
gastrotrich community of a
north Adriatic Sea site, with a
redescription of Musellifer profundus
(Chaetonotida:€Muselliferidae). Journal
of the Marine Biological Association UK
90, 645–653.
Loof, P.A.A. (1971). Freeliving and plant
parasitic nematodes from Spitzbergen,
collected by Mr. H. Van Rossen.
Mededelingen Landbouwhogenschool
Wageningen 71–7, 1–86.
Lupi, E., Ricci, V., Burrini, D. (1994).
Occurrence of nematodes in surface
water used in a drinking water plant.
Journal Water SRT-Aqua 43, 107–112.
Luther, A. (1955). Die Dalyelliiden
(Turbellaria, Neorhabdocoela):€eine
Monographie. Acta Zoologica Fennica
87, 1–337.
Luther, A. (1960). Die Turbellarien
Ostfennoskandiens. I. Acoela,
Catenulida, Macrostomida,
Lecithoepitheliata, Prolecithophora und
Proseriata. Fauna Fennica 7, 1–155.
Marcus, E. (1929). Tardigrada. In
Bronn, H.G. (ed.), Klassen und
Ordnungen des Tierreichs, Vol. 5,
pp. 1–608. Leipzig:€Akademische
Verlagsgesellschaft.
Marcus, E. (1936). Tardigrada. In Schultze,
F. (ed.), Das Tierreich, Vol. 66, pp.
1–340. Berlin:€Walter de Gruyter.
Martiny, J.B.H., Bohannan, B.J.M.,
Brown, J.H. et al. (2006).
Microbial biogeography:€putting
microorganisms on the map. Nature
Reviews 4, 102–112.
McInnes, S.J., Pugh, P.J.A. (2007).
An attempt to revisit the global
biogeography of limno-terrestrial
Tardigrada. Journal of Limnology 66,
90–96.
Melnikov, I.A. (1997). The Arctic Sea Ice
Ecosystem. Amsterdam:€Gordon and
Breach Science Publishers.
Miller, W.R., Heatwole, H.F. (2003).
Tardigrades of the sub-Antarctic:€5000
year old eggs from Marion Island.
Abstract:€9th International
Symposium on Tardigrada, Florida,
USA.
Mott, J.B., Harrison, A.D. (1983).
Nematodes from river drift and surface
drinking water supplies in southern
Ontario. Hydrobiologia 102, 27–38.
Murray, J. (1906). Scottish National
Antarctic Expedition:€Tardigrada of
the South Orkneys. Transactions of the
Royal Society of Edinburgh 45, 323–338.
Navas, A., Baldwin, J.G., Barrios, L.,
Nombela, G. (1993). Phylogeny
and biogeography of Longidorus
u b i q u i t y o f m i c r o s c o p i c a n i m a l s?
(Nematoda:€Longidoridae) in
Euromediterranea. Nematologia
Mediterranea 21, 71–88.
Nedved, O. (2004). Occurrence of
the phylum Cycliophora in the
Mediterranean. Marine Ecology€–
Progress Series 277, 297–299.
Nelson, D.R. (1982a) Developmental
biology of the Tardigrada. In Harrison,
F., Cowden, R. (eds.), Developmental
Biology of Freshwater Invertebrates, pp.
363–368. New York, NY:€Alan R. Liss.
Nelson, D.R. (2002). Current status of the
Tardigrada:€evolution and ecology.
Integrative and Comparative Biology
42, 652–659.
Nelson, D.R., McInnes, S.J. (2002).
Tardigrades. In Rundle, S.D,
Robertson, A.L., Schmid-Araya, J.M.
(eds.), Freshwater Meiofauna:€Biology
and Ecology, pp. 177–215.
Leiden:€Buckhuys.
Neves, R.C., Cunha, M.R., Funch, P.,
Kristensen, R.M., Wanninger, A.
(2010). Comparative myoanatomy of
cycliophoran life cycle stages. Journal
of Morphology 271, 596–611.
Nkem, J.N., Wall, D.H., Virginia, R.A.
et al. (2006). Wind dispersal of soil
invertebrates in the McMurdo Dry
Valleys, Antarctica. Polar Biology 29,
346–352.
Obst, M., Funch, P. (2003). Dwarf male
of Symbion pandora (Cycliophora).
Journal of Morphology 255, 261–278.
Obst, M., Funch, P., Kristensen, R.M.
(2006). A new species of Cycliophora
from the mouthparts of the American
lobster, Homarus americanus
(Nephropidae, Decapoda). Organisms,
Diversity and Evolution 6, 83–97.
Orr, C.C., Newton, O.H. (1971). Distribution
of nematodes by wind. Plant Disease
55, 61–63.
Palmer, M.A. (1988). Dispersal of
marine meiofauna:€a review and
conceptual model explaining passive
transport and active emergence with
implications for recruitment. Marine
Ecology€– Progress Series 48, 81–91.
Pejler, B. (1977). On the global distribution
of the family Brachionidae (Rotatoria).
Archiv fuer Hydrobiologie (Suppl.) 53,
255–306.
Pilato, G. (1979). Correlations between
cryptobiosis and other biological
characteristics in some soil animals.
Bollettino di Zoologica, 46, 319–332.
Pilato, G., Binda, M.G. (2001).
Biogeography and limnoterrestrial
tardigrades:€are they truly
incompatible binomials? Zoologischer
Anzeiger 240, 511–516.
Procter, D.L.C. (1984). Towards a
biogeography of free-living soil
nematodes. I. Changing species
richness, diversity and densities
with changing latitude. Journal of
Biogeography 11, 103–117.
Procter, D.L.C. (1990). Global overview
of the functional roles of soil-living
nematodes in terrestrial communities
and ecosystems. Journal of Nematology
22, 1–7.
Pugh, P.J.A., McInnes, S.J. (1998). The
origin of Arctic terrestrial and
freshwater tardigrades. Polar Biology
19, 177–182.
Ramazzotti, G. (1962). Il Phylum
Tardigrada. Memorie dell’Istituto
Italiano di Idrobiologia 16, 1–595.
Ramazzotti, G. (1972). Il Phylum Tardigrada.
II edizione. Memorie dell’Istituto
Italiano di Idrobiologia 19, 101–212.
Ramazzotti, G., Maucci, W. (1983). Il
Phylum Tardigrada. III edizione
riveduta e aggiornata. Memorie
dell’Istituto Italiano di Idrobiologia 41,
1–1012.
279
280
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Rebecchi, L., Bertolani, R. (1988).
New cases of parthenogenisis and
polyploidy in the genus Ramazzottius
(Tardigrada, Hypsibiidae) and a
hypothesis concerning their origin.
Invertebrate Reproduction and
Development 14, 187–196.
Rebecchi, L., Bertolani, R. (1994).
Maturative pattern of ovary and
testis in eutardigrades of freshwater
and terrestrial habitats. Invertebrate
Reproduction and Development 26,
107–117.
Reisinger, E., Steinböck, O. (1927). Foreløbig
meddelelse om vor zoologiske Rejse
i Grønland 1926. Meddelelser om
Grønland, København 74, 33–42.
Ricci, C., Fontaneto, D. (2009).
The importance of being a
bdelloid:€ecological and evolutionary
consequences of dormancy. Italian
Journal of Zoology 76, 240–249.
Ricci, C., Melone, G., Sotgia, C. (1993). Old
and new data on Seisonidea (Rotifera).
Hydrobiologia 255/256, 495–511.
Richters, F. (1905). Moss dwellers. Scientific
American Supplement 60 (1556), 24937.
Riedl, R.J. (1969). Gnathostomulida from
America€– This is the first record of
the new phylum from North America.
Science 163, 445–452.
Roccuzzo, G., Ciancio, A. (1991). Notes
on nematodes found in irrigation
water in southern Italy. Nematologia
Mediterranea 19, 105–108.
Rousselet, C.F. (1909). On the geographical
distribution of the Rotifera. Journal of
the Quekett Microscopical Club Ser. 2.
10, 465–470.
Schockaert, E.R., Hooge, M., Sluys, S. et
al. (2008). Global diversity of freeliving flatworms (Platyhelminthes,
“Turbellaria”) in freshwater.
Hydrobiologia 595, 41–48.
Schroeder, T., Walsh, E.J. (2007). Cryptic
speciation in the cosmopolitan
Epiphanes senta complex
(Monogononta, Rotifera) with
the description of new species.
Hydrobiologia 593, 129–140.
Segers, H. (1996). The biogeography of
littoral Lecane Rotifera. Hydrobiologia
323, 169–197.
Segers, H. (2003). A biogeographical
analysis of rotifers of the genus
Trichocerca Lamarck. 1801
(Trichocercidae, Monogononta,
Rotifera), with notes on taxonomy.
Hydrobiologia 500, 103–114.
Segers, H. (2007). A global checklist of the
rotifers (Phylum Rotifera). Zootaxa
1564, 1–104.
Segers, H. (2008). Global diversity of
rotifers (Rotifera) in freshwater.
Hydrobiologia 595, 49–59.
Segers, H., De Smet, W.H. (2008). Diversity
and endemism in Rotifera:€a review,
and Keratella Bory de St Vincent.
Biodiversity Conservation 17, 303–316.
Sekera, E. (1906). Über die Verbreitung
der Selbstbefruchtung bei den
Rhabdocoeliden. Zoologischer
Anzeiger 30, 142–153.
Sohlenius, B. (1980). Abundance, biomass
and contribution to energy flow by soil
nematodes in terrestrial ecosystems.
Oikos 34, 186–194.
Sohlenius, B., Boström, S. (2005). The
geographic distribution of metazoan
microfauna on East Antarctic
nunataks. Polar Biology 28, 439–448.
Sørensen, M.V. (2003). Further structures
in the jaw apparatus of Limnognathia
maerski (Micrognathozoa), with notes
on the phylogeny of the Gnathifera.
Journal of Morphology 255, 131–145.
Sørensen, M.V. (2008). A new kinorhynch
genus from the Antarctic deep sea
u b i q u i t y o f m i c r o s c o p i c a n i m a l s?
and a new species of Cephalorhyncha
from Hawaii (Kinorhyncha:
Cyclorhagida:Echinoderidae).
Organisms, Diversity and Evolution 8,
230–232.
Sørensen, M.V., Pardos, F. (2008).
Kinorhynch systematics and biology€–
an introduction to the study of
kinorhynchs, inclusive identification
keys to the genera. Meiofauna Marina
16, 21–73.
Sørensen, M.V., Rho, H.S. (2009).
Triodontoderes anulap gen. et sp. nov.€–
A new cyclorhagid kinorhynch genus
and species from Micronesia. Journal
of the Marine Biology Association UK
89, 1269–1279.
Sørensen, M.V., Sterrer, W. (2002). New
characters in the gnathostomulid
mouth parts revealed by scanning
electron microscopy. Journal of
Morphology 253, 310–334.
Spallanzani, L. (1776). II tardigrado
Volume II, Opuscolo IV, Sezione II,
222–253. Opuscoli di Fisica Animale e
Vegetabile. Modena.
Steinböck, O. (1931). Marine Turbellaria.
Zoology of the Faroes 8, 1–26.
Sterrer, W. (1968). Beiträge zur Kenntnis
der Gnathostomulida I. Anatomie und
Morphologie des Genus Pterognathia
Sterrer. Arkiv för Zoologi, Ser. 2 22,
1–125.
Sterrer, W. (1972). Systematics
and evolution within the
Gnathostomulida. Systematic Zoology
21, 151–173.
Sterrer, W. (1973). Plate tectonics as
a mechanism for dispersal and
speciation in interstitial sand fauna.
Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 7,
200–222.
Sterrer, W. (1991). Gnathostomulida
from Fiji, Tonga and New Zealand.
Zoologica Scripta 20, 107–128.
Sterrer, W. (1997). Gnathostomulida from
the Canary Islands. Proceedings of the
Biological Society of Washington 110,
186–197.
Sterrer, W. (1998). Gnathostomulida
from the (sub)tropical northwestern
Atlantic. Studies on the Natural History
of the Caribbean Region 74, 1–178.
Sterrer, W. (2001). Gnathostomulida from
Australia and Papua New Guinea.
Cahiers de Biologie Marine 42,
363–395.
Sterrer, W., Farris, R. (1975). Problognathia
minima n. g., n. sp., representative
of a new family of Gnathostomulida,
Problognathidae n. fam. from
Bermuda. Transactions of the American
Microscopical Society 94, 357–367.
Sudzuki, M. (1972). An analysis of
colonization in freshwater microorganisms. II. Two simple experiments
on the dispersal by wind. Japanese
Journal of Ecology 22, 222–225.
Tchesunov, A.V. (2006). Biology of Marine
Nematodes. Moscow:€KMK Scientific
Press Ltd. (in Russian).
Thorne, G. (1968). Nematodes of the
Northern Great Plains. I. Tylenchida
(Nemata, Secernentea), pp. 1–111.
Brookings, SD:€Agricultural
Experiment Station, South Dakota
State University.
Thulin, G. (1928). Über die Phylogenie und
das System der Tardigraden. Hereditas
11, 207–266.
Timoshkin, O.A., Kawakatsu, M., Korgina,
E.M., Vvedenskaya, T.L. (2004).
Preliminary analysis of the stylets
of the Gyratrix hermaphroditus
Ehrenberg, 1831 species complex
(Platyhelminthes, Neorhabdocoela,
Kalyptorhynchia) from lakes of
central Russia, Pribaikalye and
Kamachatka, lakes Baikal and Biwa.
In Timoshkin, O.A, Sitnikova, T.Ya.,
281
282
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Rusinek, O.T. et al. (eds.), Index of
Animal Species Inhabiting Lake
Baikal and its Catchment Area. Vol.
1. Lake Baikal, Book 2, pp. 1321–1343.
Novosibirsk:€Nauka.
Todaro, M.A., Hummon, W.D. (2008). An
overview and a dichotomous key to
genera of the phylum Gastrotricha.
Meiofauna Marina 16, 3–20.
Todaro, M.A., Kristensen, R.M. (1998).
A new species and first report of
the genus Nanaloricus (Loricifera,
Nanaloricida, Nanaloricidae) from the
Mediterranean Sea. Italian Journal of
Zoology 65, 219–226.
Todaro, M.A., Rocha, C.E.F. (2004).
Diversity and distribution of marine
Gastrotricha along the northern
beaches of the state of Sao Paulo
(Brazil), with description of a new
species of Macrodasys (Macrodasyida,
Macrodasyidae). Journal of Natural
History 38, 1605–1634.
Todaro, M.A., Rocha, C.E.F. (2005). Further
data on marine gastrotrichs from
the State of São Paulo and the first
records from the State of Rio de Janeiro
(Brazil). Meiofauna Marina 14, 27–31.
Todaro, M.A., Fleeger, J.W., Hummon, W.D.
(1995). Marine gastrotrichs from the
sand beaches of the northern Gulf of
Mexico:€Species list and distribution.
Hydrobiologia 310, 107–117.
Todaro, M.A., Fleeger, J.W., Hu, Y.P.,
Hrincevich, A.W., Foltz, D.W. (1996).
Are meiofauna species cosmopolitan?
Morphological and molecular
analysis of Xenotrichula intermedia
(Gastrotricha:€Chaetonotida). Marine
Biology 125, 735–742.
Todaro, M.A., Balsamo, M., Kristensen,
R.M. (2005). A new genus of marine
chaetonotids (Gastrotricha), with a
description of two new species from
Greenland and Denmark. Journal of
the Marine Biological Association UK
85, 1391–1400.
Traunspurger, W. (1991). Das Meiobenthos
des Königssees:€systematische und
ökologische Untersuhungen unter
besonderer Berücksichtigung
der Nematoda. Fischbiologie des
Königssees. Nahrunsangebot und
Nahrungswahl. Band I. Nationalpark
Berchtesgaden:€Forschungsbericht 22.
Traunspurger, W., Michiels, I.C., EyualemAbebe (2006). Composition and
distribution of free-living freshwater
nematodes:€global and local
perspectives. In Eyualem-Abebe,
Traunspurger, W., Andrássy, I. (eds.),
Freshwater Nematodes:€Ecology
and Taxonomy, pp. 46–76.
Wallingford:€CABI Publishing.
Tyler, S., Schilling, S., Hooge, M., Bush,
L.F. (comp.) (2006–2009). Turbellarian
Taxonomic Database. Version 1.5
http://turbellaria.umaine.edu.
Vanschoenwinkel, B., Gielen, S.,
Vandewaerde, H., Seaman, M.,
Brendonck, L. (2008a). Relative
importance of different dispersal
vectors for small aquatic invertebrates
in a rock pool metacommunity.
Ecography 31, 567–577.
Vanschoenwinkel, B., Gielen, S., Seaman,
M., Brendonck, L. (2008b). Any way the
wind blows€– frequent wind dispersal
drives species sorting in ephemeral
aquatic communities. Oikos 117,
125–134.
Vanschoenwinkel, B., Waterkeyn, A.,
Vandecaetsbeek, T. et al. (2008c).
Dispersal of freshwater invertebrates
by large terrestrial mammals:€a case
study with wild boar (Sus scrofa) in
Mediterranean wetlands. Freshwater
Biology 53, 2264–2273.
Vanschoenwinkel, B., Gielen, S.,
Seaman, M., Brendonck, L. (2009).
u b i q u i t y o f m i c r o s c o p i c a n i m a l s?
Wind mediated dispersal of
freshwater invertebrates in rock
pool metacommunity:€differences
in dispersal capacities and modes.
Hydrobiologia 635, 363–372.
Van Steenkiste, N., Davison, P., Artois, T.
(2010). Bryoplana xerophila n.g. n.sp., a
new limnoterrestrial microturbellarian
(Platyhelminthes, Typhloplanidae,
Protoplanellinae) from epilithic mosses,
with notes on its ecology. Zoological
Science 27, 285–291.
Wallace, R.L., Snell, T.W., Ricci, C.,
Nogrady, T. (2006). Rotifera vol.
1:€biology, ecology and systematics
(2nd edition). In Segers, H., Dumont,
H.J. (eds.), Guides to the Identification
of the Microinvertebrates of the
Continental Waters of the World,
23. Gent:€Kenobi Productions and
The Hague:€Backhuys Academic
Publishing BV.
Weiss, M.J. (2001). Widespread
hermaphroditism in freshwater
gastrotrichs. Invertebrate Biology 120,
308–341.
Wharton, D.A. (2004). Survival strategies.
In Gaugler, R., Bilgrami, A.L. (eds.),
Nematode Behaviour, pp. 371–399.
Wallingford:€CABI Publishing.
Willems, W.R., Wallberg, A., Jondelius,
U. et al. (2006). Filling a gap in the
phylogeny of flatworms:€relationships
within the Rhabdocoela
(Platyhelminthes), inferred from 18S
ribosomal DNA sequences. Zoologica
Scripta 35, 1–17.
Womersley, C.Z., Wharton, D., Higa, L.M.
(1998). Survival biology. In Perry, R.N.,
Wright, D.J. (eds.), The Physiology and
Biochemistry of Free-living and Plantparasitic Nematodes, pp. 271–302.
Wallingford:€CABI Publishing.
Wright, J.C. (2001). Cryptobiosis 300
years on from van Leuwenhoek:€what
have we learned about tardigrades?
Zoologischer Anzeiger 240, 563–582.
Wright, J.C., Westh, P., Ramløv, H. (1992).
Cryptobiosis in Tardigrada. Biological
Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical
Society 67, 1–29.
Young, J.O. (1974). The occurence
of diapause in the egg stage of
the life-cycle of Phaenocora
typhlops (Vejdovsky)
(Turbellaria:€Neorhabdocoela). Journal
of Animal Ecology 43, 719–731.
Young, J.O., Young, B.M. (1976). First
records of eight species and new
records of four species of freshwater
microturbellaria from East Africa, with
comments on modes of dispersal of
the group. Zoologischer Anzeiger 96,
93–108.
Zelinka, C. (1913). Der Echinoderen der
Deutschen Südpolar-Expedition,
1901–1903. Band 14. Berlin:€Reimer.
Zullini, A. (1973). Su alcuni nematodi di
alta quota del Nepal. Khumbu Himal 4,
401–412.
283
14
Molecular approach to micrometazoans.
Are they here, there and everywhere?
Noemi Guil
Department of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, National Museum of
Natural History (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
14.1╇ Introduction
The ‘Everything is everywhere, but the environment selects’ hypothesis (EiE
hereafter) was originally proposed to explain the apparent ubiquity of micro
organisms based on evidence from bacteria (Beijerinck, 1913). Recently, this
has been proposed also for protists (e.g. Fenchel and Finlay, 2004) and further
extended to micrometazoans (animals smaller than 2â•›m m) (Foissner, 2006).
This hypothesis assumes that microorganisms disperse worldwide due to their
microscopic sizes and dormancy capabilities, and that their distributions are
restricted only by environmental limitations. High local:global diversity ratios
for species assemblages and high gene flow between populations are thus
expected. Micrometazoans share a common evolutionary history and the multi
cellular condition with macroscopic animals, while they are similar in terms of
resources used, microscopic size and dormancy capability to microscopic unicel
lular organisms, which are supposed to be without biogeographies. Even though
micrometazoans may provide interesting evidence for the EiE hypothesis, their
diversity and phylogeography has not received much attention. However, results
Biogeography of Microscopic Organisms: Is Everything Small Everywhere?, ed. Diego Fontaneto.
Published by Cambridge University Press. © The Systematics Association 2011.
m o l e c u l a r a p p r o a c h t o m i c r o m e ta z o a n s
so far (which we will deal with along the chapter) give us some indications of eco
logical and historical–geographic influence on micrometazoan distributions.
Little is known about distributional patterns and phylogeography in micrometa
zoans€– as yet they neither support nor reject the EiE hypothesis. However, the few
studies using a molecular approach are providing useful results on micrometa
zoan patterns, cryptic species and phylogeography. The micrometazoans that have
been studied in the framework of the EiE hypothesis are those that may potentially
achieve global distributions due to their dormancy capabilities and production of
resting stages (Rebecchi et al., 2007; and Chapter 13 for a detailed review of biogeo
graphy in other micrometazoans). Accordingly, this review will focus on rotifers,
nematodes (free-living forms, generally microscopic; Eyualem Abebe et al., 2008)
and tardigrades (Fig 14.1) (Wright et al., 1992). A quick analysis of the information
included in the ISI Web of Knowledge (accessed March 2010) on spatial patterns,
biodiversity and phylogeography of micrometazoans reveals that within these
groups, our knowledge is biased towards rotifers (Fig 14.2A). Moreover, there are
more marine-based studies available for tardigrades and free-living nematodes,
and more freshwater studies for rotifers (Fig 14.2B). Focusing only on molecular
studies for these three phyla, the lack of information becomes dramatic (rotifers, 25
papers; tardigrades, 11 papers; nematodes, 10 papers) (Fig 14.2C).
In this chapter, I will review the available molecular information on micrometa
zoans within the EiE framework and discuss assumptions, conclusions and future
perspectives which could shed some light about where micrometazoans are.
14.2╇ Dispersal and colonisation
The EiE hypothesis assumes that organisms with microscopic size have high pas
sive dispersal rates and consequently are widely distributed (Fenchel and Finlay,
2004). To achieve highly effective dispersal, dormant stages have to survive dur
ing dispersal, recover afterwards and be able to establish in the new place. Here, I
review the evidence for each of these steps.
14.2.1╇ Direct evidence of dispersal
Active dispersal in micrometazoans may be effective at very short distances, but
passive dispersal is possible over very long distances. Main vectors discussed for
transporting zooplankton are wind, rainfall and animals. Waterfowl have been
found as vectors of zooplankton (Figuerola et al., 2005; Frisch et al., 2007), including
nematodes and rotifers, transporting them both externally (on feet and feathers)
and internally (in the stomach) (Derycke et al., 2005; Eyualem Abebe et al., 2008;
Segers and De Smet, 2008). Freshwater rotifers disperse efficiently in water bod
ies as they have been found in artificial mesocosms left open in the field (Cáceres
285
286
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Fig 14.1 Resume of phylogenetic hypotheses proposed by Dunn et al. (2008) among
animal phyla. Metazoans considered microscopic (< 2â•›m m) are underlined. Invertebrate
phyla with a wide range of sizes among species, genera or families, including microscopic
but also macroscopic sizes are marked with an asterisk (*). Metazoans with cryptobiotic
episodes only in some stages of their life cycles are indicated with a plus character (+).
Micrometazoans with cryptobiosis during their whole life cycle are signed with arrows.
Tardigrada showed an uncertain position within Ecdysozoa:€with Nematoida (Nematoda
+ Nematomorpha) or with Panarthropoda (Arthropoda + Onycophora).
and Soluk, 2002; Bohonak and Jenkins, 2003; Cohen and Shurin, 2003). However,
one study collecting organisms dispersed by wind and rainfall found very few dor
mant stages of rotifer (Jenkins and Underwood, 1998), suggesting that these ani
mals may not be dispersed as well as assumed by these vectors. Passive dispersal
m o l e c u l a r a p p r o a c h t o m i c r o m e ta z o a n s
Fig 14.2 Information about papers published from the ISI Web of Knowledge (March
2010). (A) Percentage of papers published by phylum among the three micrometazoans
studied. (B) Absolute number of papers published by environment and taxa (Nematoda,
Rotifera, Tardigrada). (C) Absolute number of papers published dealing with molecular
analyses by environment and taxa (Nematoda, Rotifera, Tardigrada).
287
288
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
by wind for tardigrades for long distances has been assumed to be frequent for a
long time, but only two experiments actually measuring it have been published.
They both deal with local scales, one under laboratory conditions (Sudzuki, 1972)
and the other in a mountain slope (Janiec, 1996). On the other hand, transcon
tinental dispersal for propagules of lichens, mosses, liverwort and pteridophytes
have variously been demonstrated (Muñóz et al., 2004; Buschbom, 2007; see also
Chapters 10–12); it is thus plausible also for other microorganisms such as nema
todes, rotifers and tardigrades which inhabit the same environments and have
dormant stages of similar sizes and resistance capabilities.
14.2.2╇ Indirect evidence of dispersal
If dispersal does occur regularly and the dispersing micrometazoans success
fully colonise new areas, high gene flow between populations would be expected.
Provided there was a very high dispersal rate, no patterns in the genetic struc
ture of populations would be expected, neither at local nor regional scales. Gene
flow is usually measured with the fixation index (FST):€this quantifies the inbreed
ing effect of population substructure by comparing the least inclusive to the
most inclusive levels of the population hierarchy (Wright, 1921); higher FST values
indicate lower gene flow and higher genetic differentiation between populations
(Bohonak, 1999). However, dispersal may not translate into gene flow (Katz et al.,
2005) for several reasons (e.g. failure of immigrants to breed in the new environ
ment, unequal migration rates between populations, or artefacts due to small
sample size or sampling at the wrong scale; Bohonak, 1999). In short, successful
dispersal is a necessary but not sufficient requirement for gene flow and genetic
homogenisation of populations within a species.
Some indirect measurements of effective dispersal through genetic informa
tion of gene flow (low FST values) have been obtained for tardigrades (global scales,
Jørgensen et al., 2007; local scales, Guil and Giribet, 2009). In contrast, monogonont
rotifers, which show cyclical parthenogenesis with dormant stages represented by
resting eggs, showed low gene flow and thus high FST values despite their poten
tially high dispersal rates at local and regional scales (Gómez et al., 2002b; Gómez,
2005). This strong genetic structure for rotifers has been explained by the ‘serial
founder effect’ hypothesis (De Meester et al., 2002; Gómez et al., 2002b; Mills et€a l.,
2007). The serial founder effect, also known as the ‘monopolisation hypothesis’ (De
Meester et al., 2002), assumes continuous waves of individuals reaching an area
(immigrants) and not being able to colonise it because of competition with the
local, better-adapted residents. Such a sequence of events results in low gene flow
between resident and new immigrant individuals and in genetic differentiation
and isolation-by-distance patterns at larger spatial scales (Gómez et al., 2002b).
This process would start with the former colonisers rapidly increasing in num
bers and establishing their genotypes in the newly colonised area. New immigrant
m o l e c u l a r a p p r o a c h t o m i c r o m e ta z o a n s
genotypes would be in low numbers in comparison to resident ones since they
would arrive by chance after passive dispersal. Thus, immigrant genotypes will
not establish populations in the given area (De Meester et al., 2002), because no
gene flow between resident and immigrant genotypes will occur, or not in signifi
cant numbers to be fixed in the population. Immigrant genotypes will establish
populations in available, empty areas located further away (with no competition
with resident genotypes), such that the areas further away would be colonised by
the progeny of the first colonisation wave (as in a stepping-stone model). A per
sistent founder effect will be even stronger in taxa with dormant stages, which
could act as a genotype bank, buffering against the effect of immigrant genotypes
(De Meester et al., 2002). Population structure such as isolation-by-distance pat
terns could be explained by a persistent founder effect (neutral processes) and
local adaptation (selective processes), particularly effective in aquatic organisms,
either in combination with or separately from palaeogeographic effects such as
glacial refugia (Gómez et al., 2007). Results confirming this hypothesis have been
obtained for rotifers (Gómez et al., 2002b, 2007; Mills et al., 2007, Derycke et al.,
2008b; Fontaneto et al., 2008a), some crustaceans such as Daphnia (Palsson, 2000)
and Artemia (Naihong et al., 2000), and nematodes (Derycke et al., 2005).
14.2.3╇ Survival of dormant stages
Dormancy appears in many phyla (Wright, 2001; Watanabe et al., 2004; Dunn
et al., 2008) and has been acquired independently many times (Fig 14.1).
Micrometazoans may survive in the dormant stage for a very long time:€at least 28
years for nematodes (Fielding, 1951), nine years for rotifers (Guidetti and Jönsson,
2002) and 20 years for tardigrades (Jørgensen et al., 2007). Factors such as humid
ity levels, speed of the desiccation and rehydration processes, substrate texture
and oxygen concentration can be important for survival in dormant animals
(Guidetti and Jönsson, 2002; McSorley, 2003; Horikawa and Higashi, 2004; Ricci
et€a l., 2008; Faurby et al., 2008). These processes are important for oxidation which
seems to be involved in the biological degradation during dormancy (Guidetti and
Jönsson, 2002; Neumann et al., 2009). High survival rates after dormancy periods
found in tardigrades would facilitate their dispersal and colonisation (Ramløv and
Westh, 2001; Li and Wang, 2005; Rebecchi et al., 2007, 2009; Hengherr et al., 2008).
Considerable within-species variability in survival rates after dormancy was docu
mented in terrestrial tardigrades; it can be associated with different genotypes
(Faurby et al., 2008), biological aspects (Rebecchi et al., 2006), geographic distri
bution (Jönsson et al., 2001), habitat conditions (Wright, 1991), or a mix of habi
tat and geographic characteristics (Horikawa and Higashi, 2004). Both in rotifers
and tardigrades, higher fecundity and longevity could be observed in individuals
and populations which underwent dormancy than in individuals and populations
kept under constantly hydrated conditions (Ricci and Caprioli, 2005; Rebecchi
289
290
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
et€al., 2009). So, dormancy may also increase fitness; the proposed mechanisms
has been suggested to be a DNA repairing system activated during the recovery
steps (Schill et al., 2008; Neumann et al., 2009); nevertheless, no clear hypotheses
on any process have been tested yet.
Apart from dispersal and survival ability, reproduction mode is important for
establishing a population after dispersal. Micrometazoans reproduce both sexu
ally and asexually, and even alternate between the two (De Meester et al., 2002).
Asexual species seem to be better adapted to colonisation by passive dispersal
because they can create a population from a single individual arriving in a new
area. In contrast, sexual specimens would need at least two individuals of both gen
ders. This sexual vs. asexual issue (and the possibility to change within the same
species) is important within the EiE framework since it could determine success
or failure in the colonisation of a new area. The main problem for parthenogenesis
would be the loss of genetic variability, which is one of the main explanations for
the overwhelming presence of sexual recombination in living organisms (Gómez,
2005). However, the recent finding of horizontal gene transfer in parthenogenetic
bdelloid rotifers with bacterial, fungi and plant origins has opened the question
of whether DNA segments are released from related individuals, as then rotifers
could have genetic exchange resembling that in sexual populations (Gladyshev
et al., 2008). However, evolutionary influence of the reproductive modes is a com
plex topic which is not the objective of the present chapter; for overviews see Crow
(1994), Hillis (2007) and Schurko et al. (2008).
14.3╇ Cosmopolitan distributions:€a matter of
overlooked diversity?
Diversity, taxonomy and distribution of species are main topics within the EiE
because based on this information we would determine if organisms are or are
not widely distributed, and so if micrometazoans can be everywhere.
14.3.1╇ Diversity
Certainly, some microorganisms tend to have wider distributions than macro
scopic animals, but this could also be explained by their older phylogenetic ages
which provided them with more time to disperse (Foissner, 2006). Based on the
EiE, high local diversity (since broad distributions of micrometazoan species) and
high ratios of local:global diversity would be expected; but little can be concluded
when local, regional and global diversity is widely unknown, as is the case with
nematodes, rotifers and tardigrades. Under the EiE, given one habitat type, spe
cies that are present in this habitat in one geographic area should in principle be
present in the same habitat worldwide and so their local:global diversity would be
m o l e c u l a r a p p r o a c h t o m i c r o m e ta z o a n s
high. However, it is impossible to make habitats comparable in different geographic
areas, finding exactly the same environmental characteristics and biotic interre
lationships within habitats, consequently, it is impossible to test this assumption
(Foissner, 2006). We thus have to cope with two important limitations:€first, a lack
of knowledge on species distribution at all scales; and second, incomplete and
unreliable taxonomy. The two issues are related because biodiversity assessments
can be distorted if based on unreliable taxonomy. Information is lacking for basic
aspects of micrometazoan taxonomy, biogeography and biology (e.g. Gastrotricha
and Rotifera, Ricci and Balsamo, 2000; Nematoda, Eyualem Abebe et al., 2008;
Gastrotricha, Balsamo et al., 2008; Tardigrada, Guil and Cabrero-Sañudo, 2007);
this could be due to their lack of economic and/or health interests. Some attempts
to widen the economic interest in these organisms have been undertaken, for
example in applications of dormancy to ageing, tumorigenesis and cancer (Huang
and Tunnacliffe, 2006). Less effort is, however, invested on basic research lines.
Few taxonomists working on morphology exist and less basic information is avail
able for any further research. Without the basic taxonomic information, biodiver
sity analyses both at the local and global scale are bound to fail.
14.3.2╇ Cryptic species and DNA taxonomy
Due to the small size of micrometazoans and homogeneous morphologies among
species and genera, some diversity could be hidden. Cryptic species are frequently
discovered in a wide range of micrometazoans as soon as molecular information
is included (e.g. nematodes, Derycke et al., 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008a; Fonseca et al.,
2008; Nieberding et al., 2005; rotifers, Gómez et al., 2002a; Gómez, 2005; Birky,
2007; Fontaneto et al., 2008a, 2008b, 2009; tardigrades, Jørgensen et al., 2007; Guil
and Giribet, 2009). Moreover, during their collection and isolation, many rare
species can be overlooked, especially if they are particularly small and/or have
a cryptic appearance within the environment. This leads to a massive underesti
mation of the actual diversity, since these rare species can comprise more than
80% of the species in a community (Schwerdtfeger, 1975; Foissner et al., 2002). The
introduction of molecular techniques in systematic studies could help in solving
taxonomic problems and discover some of the cryptic diversity. Measures of diver
sity based on traditional versus molecular taxonomy may then give inconsistent
estimates; as an example, DNA taxonomy resulted in 2–2.5 times higher estimates
at the community level for moss-dwelling rotifers (Kaya et al., 2009). However,
proto�cols to delimit species using DNA taxonomy are still under development
(summarised in Moritz and Cicero, 2004; Birky, 2007; Chang et al., 2009; Valentini
et al., 2009). Cytochrome oxidase I (COI) is the most widely used molecular marker
for species barcoding (Hebert et al., 2003). In addition, other genetic markers have
been proposed for micrometazoans, either because problems appeared with COI
in certain taxa, or to complement the information provided by COI (e.g. 18S RNA,
291
292
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Bhadury et al., 2006; COb, Birky, 2007; ITS1, Gómez, 2005; ITS2, Jørgensen et al.,
2007). The main problem is to define the level of molecular divergence at which
species should be distinguished. A general genetic divergence threshold of 3% was
proposed for COI barcoding, and it identified 196 out of 200 species from five phyla
(Hebert et al., 2003). In micrometazoans, thresholds of 3% have been suggested
for tardigrades (Cesari et al., 2009), 4% for some rotifers (Derry et al., 2003) and
over 5% for some nematodes (Nieberding et al., 2005). More elaborate approaches
to species delimitation based on phylogenetic and/or population analyses have
been proposed (see for example, Pons et al., 2006; Wiens, 2007), but critiques and
discussions still remain open, and a clear conclusion has yet to be reached (e.g.
Lohse, 2009; Papadopoulou et al., 2009).
14.3.3╇ Cosmopolitan distributions
Given the mentioned considerations concerning micrometazoan distributions
and unreliable taxonomy, what can we say about cosmopolitan distributions
among micrometazoans? Unfortunately, very little. From morphology, some
species have been considered cosmopolitans, but doubts have arisen because
some morphological differences among populations of these species have been
found. As a consequence, these ‘cosmopolitan’ species have started to be con
sidered complexes of species (common in many taxa, for example:€polychaetes,
Westheide and Schmidt, 2003; harpacticoids, Gómez et al., 2004; rotifers, Suatoni
et al., 2006, Ricci and Fontaneto, 2009; cycliophorans, Baker and Giribet, 2007,
Baker et al., 2007; gastrotrichs, Leasi and Todaro, 2009). Recently, it has been
discovered that some micrometazoan species previously considered cosmopoli
tans are not supported as units of diversity by morphological and/or molecular
information (i.e. Fontaneto et al., 2009). And in many cases, molecular infor
mation has supported the existence of more than one independent phylogenetic
lineage (sensu Guil and Giribet, 2009) within a complex previously considered as
a single cosmopolitan species. In those cases, either the rate of molecular evo
lution might be comparatively rapid, or the rate of morphological divergence
might be slow (Todaro et al., 1996), and some taxa identified by molecular tax
onomy might not be differentiated morphologically. Contrary to these results, a
complex of morphologically distinct tardigrade species was found to be only one
independent phylogenetic lineage using COI sequences for a local geographic
scale (Echinicus blumi-canadensis series in a Spanish mountain range, Guil and
Giribet, 2009).
But are there micrometazoan species which could be truly cosmopolitan? Truly
cosmopolitan species and haplotypes have been suggested within micrometazo
ans (Gómez, 2005; Fontaneto et al., 2007), and probably, the whole range of alter
natives (from cosmopolitanism to local endemism) can be possible (Segers and De
Smet, 2008). We are really limited in what we can conclude about micrometazoan
m o l e c u l a r a p p r o a c h t o m i c r o m e ta z o a n s
diversity and distribution, which makes it impossible to really test the EiE hypoth
esis for micrometazoans at the current state of knowledge.
14.4╇ Patterns and processes
According to the EiE hypothesis, populations of microorganisms would be iso
lated only by ecological specialisation and not by geographic limitations because
of their highly efficient dispersal capabilities; historical events would thus be
irrelevant (Fenchel and Finlay, 2004). Micrometazoans often show ecological and/
or biotic gradients in their patterns of biodiversity. However, among the few papers
that have studied genetic structure in micrometazoans, the majority analysed
environmental variables (e.g. nematodes, Derycke et al., 2006; tardigrades, Guil
and Giribet, 2009), and only a few papers analysed phylogeography (e.g. rotifers,
Gómez, 2005). Ecological patterns for different haplotypes (gradients of pollution
and salinity, habitat characteristics and soil type) have been found in micrometa
zoans (e.g. nematodes, Derycke et al., 2005, 2006, 2007; tardigrades, Guil and
Giribet, 2009) relating them more to what the EiE hypothesis postulates than to
the situation seen in macroscopic animals, where mixed effects of historical and
ecological drivers are observed. However, only low levels of genetic variance were
explained by those ecological variables. This could indicate both that the actu
ally important environmental variables have not been considered and/or that his
torical events have also influenced the genetic structure of the micrometazoans,
but have not been tested. Exclusive influence of either ecological or historical/
geographic events on population structure is not biologically intuitive:€ occa
sional migrants cross even the most extreme barriers (e.g. colonisation of oceanic
islands), and limited dispersal and patchy environments of most organisms do
restrict gene flow at some level (Butlin et al., 2008).
Isolation-by-distance patterns have been found in certain micrometazoans
but not in others. This pattern reflects structure in the geographic distribution (if
existing) through correlation between genetic differences (measured by FST val
ues) and geographic distances. If isolation-by-distance is occurring, genetic dif
ferences are expected to increase exponentially with geographic distance because
gene flow is restricted, and then we observe genetic structure. So, we would expect
no isolation-by-distance for microorganisms under the EiE hypothesis because
significant gene flow does happen (caused by high efficiency in dispersal and col
onisation), and so there is a homogenisation effect on the gene pool within the
population. However, some micrometazoans with potentially high dispersal effi
ciency show an isolation-by-distance pattern explained by a serial founder effect,
as was used originally to explain human dispersion and distribution in mod
ern history (Cavalli-Sforza and Feldman, 2003), as I have explained in section
293
294
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
14.2.2. In other micrometazoans, either an isolation-by-distance pattern has not
been tested or insignificant genetic differences have been found when correlated
with geographic distances (for a more detailed analysis of this processes, refer to
Chapter 16).
Phylogeography studies spatial relationships using gene genealogies to deduce
evolutionary histories; more than one genetic marker is usually used since each
genomic region has its own genealogy; species phylogenetic history is the com
bination of these (Avise, 2000; Emerson and Hewitt, 2005; Edwards, 2009). The
few studies on micrometazoan phylogeography at regional and larger scales have
shown that the observed geographic patterns are probably the result of complex
interactions of both historical and ecological events (rotifers, Gómez, 2005, Gómez
et al., 2007; nematodes, Nieberding et al., 2005; Derycke et al., 2008b). Gómez
(2005) showed that the strong genetic structure found in some aquatic rotifers
reflected the impact of Pleistocene glaciations, but also that this genetic structure
was linked to ecological characteristics such as water salinity and temperature
(Gómez et al., 1997; Serra et al. 1998) or food preferences (Ciros-Perez et al., 2001).
The low number of phylogeographic studies in other micrometazoans prevents us
from neglecting the influence of historical events on genetic structure, and does
not allow estimation of the importance of environmental variables. So, a great
effort in multiple disciplines is needed to improve our knowledge about the influ
ence of different factors on diversity patterns found in micrometazoans.
14.5╇ Obstacles to molecular approaches in
micrometazoans
This review on molecular studies on micrometazoans has highlighted a lack of
published works on said topic. There are specific difficulties involved in molecu
lar analyses of micrometazoans which is probably the reason for the scarcity of
molecular information for this animal groups. Their size is the main issue, creat
ing several practical difficulties:€(1) for collecting, since rare morphospecies could
be overlooked (Guil and Cabrero-Sañudo, 2007) and many species have been
found only in remote and unapproachable locations; (2) for morphological iden
tification to species level before DNA extraction, because temporal microscopic
slide preparations are done and later dismantled to recover the animal, and the
whole animal has finally to be used for DNA extraction; and (3) because of the low
amount of DNA obtained per individual for sequencing analyses. Moreover, the
published studies focus on very few taxa which are easy to find, widely distributed,
etc. Information is thus very limited and extrapolations are very probably biased.
In addition, the scarcity of GenBank (or any other molecular database available)
information makes these groups hard to work with. For example, the commonly
m o l e c u l a r a p p r o a c h t o m i c r o m e ta z o a n s
used Folmer universal primers for COI do not seem to amplify the locus in some
species of Nematoda (Bhadury et al., 2006) and Tardigrada (Guil and Giribet, 2009).
Moreover, a lack of primary information does not allow designing a priori specific
primers, slowing down research within this topic. Finally, similar to what happens
with other organisms, rare species appear in low numbers of individuals per site,
which means that intraspecific variability is difficult to estimate (e.g. tardigrades,
Guil, 2008; Guil and Giribet, 2009).
14.6╇ Tardigrade case
These tiny animals are a very interesting case of micrometazoans within the EiE
framework; despite this, they have been completely neglected. Tardigrades are
microscopic (the largest animals are around 2â•›m m, Guil, 2008), and many spe
cies are capable of entering dormancy at any moment of their life cycle, when
unfavourable conditions are present in the environment. Tardigrade survival cap
acity of dormant and active forms, together with their capability to adapt in very
different environments (terrestrial and extraterrestrial) fulfils the requirements
for dispersal and survival of the EiE hypothesis. Tardigrade dispersal has been
studied with direct (Sudzuki, 1972; Janiec, 1996), but also with indirect measure
ments through molecular information (Jørgensen et al., 2007; Guil and Giribet,
2009). No other information about dispersal, such as vectors (wind, rainfall and
animal) is available for tardigrades. On the other hand, tardigrades survive both
dormancy episodes and extreme conditions in dormant (but also in active) forms
(Rebecchi et€al., 2009), and have DNA repairing systems involved in the wake-up
step after dormancy (Schill et al., 2008; Neumann et al., 2009). Moreover, higher
fitness is found in some species when cyclically desiccated (Rebecchi et al., 2009).
High survival rates have been found in tardigrades after exposing them to extreme
environmental conditions (e.g. low€ – almost absolute zero€ – and high tempera
tures, Ramløv and Westh, 2001; Li and Wang, 2005; Rebecchi et al., 2007, 2009;
Hengherr et al., 2008; immersion in organic solvents, Ramløv and Westh, 2001;
exposure to ionising radiation, Horikawa et al., 2006; Jönsson and Schill, 2007;
Jönsson et al., 2008), mainly in dormant forms but also in active forms (Jönsson
et€al., 2005; Horikawa et al., 2006, 2008), in terrestrial but also under space vac
uum, microgravity and cosmic radiation in extraterrestrial environments (Jönsson
et al., 2008; Rebecchi et al., 2009). Their capability to adapt to microgravity under
extraterrestrial conditions (Rebecchi et al., 2009) gives us a clue about their plas
ticity in terms of adaptation to new environmental conditions, even when species’
ecological requirements, ranges and plasticity are widely unknown. Sexual but
also asexual species can be found within Tardigrada (Ramazzotti and Maucci,
1983), thus colonisation of new areas could be achieved by these two strategies.
295
296
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
For example, species for which population genetic structure have been studied
(E. testudo, Jørgensen et al., 2007; E. blumi-canadensis, Guil and Giribet, 2009)
(Figs 14.3A and 14.3B) can reproduce either asexually (Dastych, 1987; Bertolani
et al., 1990; Jørgensen et al., 2007) or sexually (Claxton, 1996) with variable percent
ages of males within the populations:€ from 2.6% in Spain’s E. blumi-canadensis
(Guil, 2008; Guil and Giribet, 2009) and 7% in North American E. mauccii (Mitchell
and Romano, 2007) to 28–53% in eight species of Echiniscus in Australia (Claxton,
1996). Furthermore, within the same species different sexual reproductive modes
have being observed in populations inhabiting different habitats (R. Guidetti, per
sonal communication).
Little can be concluded about local diversities and local:global diversity ratios
in tardigrades, so we cannot support or reject the hypothesis that tardigrades tend
to have high or low local, regional or global diversities. Few revisions concern
ing the global distribution of Tardigrada species have been published (all species,
Ramazzotti and Maucci, 1983; only limnoterrestrial species, McInnes, 1994), thus,
little updated information is available. These revisions showed species with broad
but also species with narrow distributions (McInnes, 1994). However, taxonomic
studies in tardigrades have been focused on selected geographic areas and habi
tats, potentially producing biased results and with limited extrapolation in spe
cies distributions (Guil, 2002; Guil and Cabrero-Sañudo, 2007). As in many other
micrometazoans, tardigrade taxonomy is difficult due to the low number of mor
phological characters available (Guidetti and Bertolani, 2005; Cesari et€al., 2009),
distorting diversity at all scales. Little information is available in tardigrades for
species delimitation from DNA taxonomy and the majority comes from phylo
genetic analyses at a higher taxonomic level (Garey et al., 1996, 1999; Giribet
et al., 1996; Regier et al., 2003; Jørgensen and Kristensen, 2004; Guidetti et al., 2005;
Nichols et al., 2006; Møbjerg et al., 2007; Schill and Steinbruck, 2007; Sands et al.,
2008b), which have focused on marine and terrestrial environments (Fig 14.2C).
Only six out of 46 papers using molecular information dealt with molecular dif
ferentiation within species and focused on cryptic species (Jørgensen et al., 2007;
Faurby et al., 2008; Sands et al., 2008a; Cesari et al., 2009; Guidetti et al., 2009; Guil
and Giribet, 2009; Fig 14.1C). Cryptic species have been discovered with recent
molecular analyses in both Heterotardigrada (Echiniscus testudo, Jørgensen et al.,
2007; Fig 14.3A) and Eutardigrada (Guidetti et al., 2009); but the opposite has also
been found in heterotardigrades:€a complex of species (at least five morphological
species) of the Echiniscus blumi-canadensis series (Fig 14.3B) with no genetic dif
ferentiation based on COI sequences (Guil and Giribet, 2009). Besides, some spe
cies considered cosmopolitans (such as Milnesium tardigradum; Fig 14.3C) are now
known to have morphological and molecular differences within the same nominal
species (personal observations, and R. Guidetti and R. M. Kristensen, personal
communication). A preliminary threshold of 3% genetic divergence (Cesari et al.,
m o l e c u l a r a p p r o a c h t o m i c r o m e ta z o a n s
Fig 14.3 Tardigrada species. (A) Echiniscus testudo (Echiniscidae, Echiniscoidea,
Heterotardigrada). (B) Echiniscus trisetosus (from the Echinicus blumi-canadensis
series) (Echiniscidae, Echiniscoidea, Heterotardigrada). (C) Milnesium tardigradum
(Milnesiidae, Apochela, Eutardigrada). (D) Macrobiotus hufelandi (Macrobiotidae,
Parachela, Eutardigrada). Scale bar 100â•›µ m.
297
298
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
2009) has been proposed to determine cryptic species from molecular informa
tion, but based only on sequences from Macrobiotus species (Fig 14.3D).
Finally, no clear conclusions can be reached about the influence of ecological
or geographic/historical factors over tardigrade patterns and phylogeography,
although preliminary results are promising and informative. Molecular spatial
patterns in tardigrades have been hardly studied in relation either with ecological
or historical/geographic factors. From the two published papers on tardigrade gen
etic structure, one at global (Jørgensen et al., 2007) and another at local (Guil and
Giribet, 2009) scales, some clues can be deduced. On the one hand, tardigrades
have not shown an isolation-by-distance pattern so far; this is perhaps due to the
small size of the area studied (Guil and Giribet, 2009), or because DNA extracted
from pooled specimens per species (Jørgensen et al., 2007) mixed up into a con
sensus sequence per site, and any geographic pattern was overlooked. On the
other hand, E. testudo did not show any phylogeographic pattern, either with COI
and ITS2, even when global scale was used, involving Europe, Asia, North America
and Greenland (Jørgensen et al., 2007). The E. blumi-canadensis series did show
an ecological pattern based on soil type for COI even when it was at a local scale
(Guil and Giribet, 2009). However, this ecological pattern only explained 8% of
genetic variance; it is unknown what factors explain the remaining 92% of genetic
variance.
14.7╇ Summary
Many, if not all questions remain open. Little information is available about
micrometazoans and, in particular, about nematodes, rotifers and tardigrades;
this paucity of knowledge does not allow for any conclusion on the patterns and
processes involved in their present distribution. The spatial patterns found so far
explain low percentages of genetic variance, and the few phylogeographic analyses
show signs that both historical/geographic and ecological events are involved in
shaping the distribution of micrometazoans similarly to what is known in macro
scopic animals. The whole range of alternatives (from endemism to cosmopolitan)
is possible within these microinvertebrates, but some of these alternatives have
yet to be discovered. Information on micrometazoan species, geography and gen
etics is lacking and perhaps biased, and thus conclusions drawn are unclear and
extrapolations premature. Consequently, no hypothesis, including the EiE, can be
accepted or rejected so far.
Nematodes, rotifers and tardigrades are a model to study evolutionary hypoth
eses, e.g. the influence of environment vs. historical events on their distribution,
since they have a common evolutionary history with all other animals, while
sharing environmental and biological characteristics such as cryptobiosis with
m o l e c u l a r a p p r o a c h t o m i c r o m e ta z o a n s
unicellular organisms. Special characteristics of micrometazoans allow study of
the influence of factors such as survival in extreme conditions or dormancy on
adaptation, colonisation and evolution, which cannot be tested in macroscopic
animals. However, the most basic taxonomical, distributional, biological and
ecological information in these micrometazoans is far from complete and biased
towards few species and environments. It is evident that much more effort is
needed at all levels and in all topics to increase our knowledge about microinver
tebrates, especially where recent molecular studies have been illustrative. More
questions and new perspectives will arise as our knowledge on these creatures
increases.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Annie Machordom Barbe and Sara Sánchez
Moreno for their valuable comments and suggestions. I would like to thank Diego
Fontaneto for his invitation to write a chapter in this book, and subsequent dis
cussions about the topic. In addition, I thank helpful comments and suggestions
from an anonymous reviewer. This research was supported by:€ a Marie Curie
Intra European Fellowship within the 7th European Community Framework
Programme, the CSIC (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas) through the
JAE-DOC programme and a scientific project funded by the Ministry of Education
and Science (number CTM2008–00496).
References
Avise, J. C. (2000). Phylogeography:€The
History and Formation of Species.
Cambridge, MA:€Harvard University
Press.
Baker, J.M., Giribet, G. (2007). A molecular
phylogenetic approach to the phylum
Cycliophora provides further evidence
for cryptic speciation in Symbion
americanus. Zoologica Scripta 36,
353–359.
Baker, J.M., Funch, P., Giribet, G. (2007).
Cryptic speciation in the recently
discovered American cycliophoran
Symbion americanus; genetic structure
and population expansion. Marine
Biology 151, 2183–2193.
Balsamo, M., D´Hondt, J.L., Kisielewski,€J.,
Pierboni, L. (2008). Global diversity
of gastrotrichs (gastrotricha) in fresh
waters. Hydrobiologia 595, 85–91.
Beijerinck, M.W. (1913). De infusies en de
ontdekking der backteriën. Jaarboek
van de Koninklijke Akademie v.
Wetenschappen. Amsterdam:€Müller.
Bertolani, R., Rebecchi, L., Beccaccioli, G.
(1990). Dispersal of Ramazzottius and
other tardigrades in relation to type of
reproduction. Invertebrate Reproduction
and Development 18, 153–157.
Bhadury, P., Austen, M.C., Bilton, D.T. et al.
(2006). Development and evaluation
of a DNA-barcoding approach for the
299
300
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
rapid identification of nematodes.
Marine Ecology Progress Series 320,
1–9.
Birky, C.W. (2007). Workshop on
barcoded DNA:€application to rotifer
phylogeny, evolution, and systematics.
Hydrobiologia 593, 175–183.
Bohonak, A.J. (1999). Dispersal, gene flow,
and population structure. Quarterly
Review of Biology 74, 21–45.
Bohonak, A.J., Jenkins, D.G. (2003).
Ecological and evolutionary
significance of dispersal by freshwater
invertebrates. Ecology Letters 6,
783–796.
Buschbom, J. (2007). Migration between
continents:€geographical structure
and long-distance gene flow in
Porpidia flavicunda (lichen-forming
Ascomycota). Molecular Ecology 16,
1835–1846.
Butlin, R.K., Galindo, J., Grahame, J.W.
(2008). Sympatric, parapatric or
allopatric:€the most important way
to classify speciation? Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society Series
B 363, 2997–3007.
Cáceres, C.E., Soluk, D.A. (2002). Blowing
in the wind:€a field test of overland
dispersal and colonization by aquatic
invertebrates. Oecologia 131, 402–408.
Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., Feldman, M.W.
(2003). The application of molecular
genetic approaches to the study of
human evolution. Nature Genetics 33,
266–275.
Cesari, M., Bertolani, R., Rebecchi, L,
Guidetti, R. (2009). DNA barcoding
in Tardigrada: the first case study on
Macrobiotus macrocalix Bertolani
& Rebecchi 1993 (Eutardigrada,
Macrobiotidae). Molecular Ecology
Resources 9, 699–706.
Chang, C.H., Rougerie, R., Chen, J.H.
(2009). Identifying earthworms
through DNA barcodes:€pitfalls and
promise. Pedobiologia 52, 171–180.
Ciros-Pérez, J., Carmona M.J., Serra, M.
(2001). Resource competition between
sympatric sibling rotifer species.
Limnology and Oceanography 46,
1511–1523.
Claxton, S.K. (1996). Sexual dimorphisms
in Australian Echiniscus (Tardigrada,
Echiniscidae) with description of three
new species. Zoological Journal of the
Linnean Society 116, 13–33.
Cohen, G.M., Shurin, J.B. (2003). Scaledependence and mechanisms of
dispersal in freshwater zooplankton.
Oikos 103, 603–617.
Crow, J.F. (1994). Advantages of sexual
reproduction. Developmental Genetics
15, 205–213.
Dastych, H. (1987). Two new species
of Tardigrada from the Canadian
Subarctic with some notes on
sexual dimorphism in the family
Echiniscidae. Entomologische
Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen
Museum Hamburg 8, 319–334.
De Meester, L., Gómez, A., Okamura,€B.,
Schwenk, K. (2002). The Monopolization
Hypothesis and the dispersal–gene flow
paradox in aquatic organisms. Acta
Oecologica 23, 121–135.
Derry, A.M., Hebert, P.D., Prepas, E.E.
(2003). Evolution of rotifers in saline
and subsaline lakes:€a molecular
phylogenetic approach. Limnology
and Oceanography 48, 675–685.
Derycke, S., Remerie, T., Vierstraete,
A. et al. (2005). Mitochondrial DNA
variation and cryptic speciation within
the free-living marine nematode
Pellioditis marina. Marine Ecology
Progress Series 300, 91–103.
Derycke, S., Backeljau, T., Vlaeminck, C.
et al. (2006). Seasonal dynamics of
population genetic structure in cryptic
m o l e c u l a r a p p r o a c h t o m i c r o m e ta z o a n s
taxa of the Pellioditis marina complex
(Nematoda:€Rhabditida). Genetica 128,
307–321.
Derycke, S., Backeljau, T., Vlaeminck, C.
et al. (2007). Spatiotemporal analysis
of population genetic structure in
Geomonhystera disjuncta (Nematoda,
Monhysteridae) reveals high levels of
molecular diversity. Marine Biology
151, 1799–1812.
Derycke, S., Fonseca, G., Vierstraete, A.
et al. (2008a). Disentangling taxonomy
within the Rhabditis (Pellioditis)
marina (Nematoda, Rhabditidae)
species complex using molecular and
morphological tools. Zoological Journal
of the Linnean Society 152, 1–15.
Derycke, S., Remerie, T., Backeljau, T.
et al. (2008b). Phylogeography of the
Rhabditis (Pellioditis) marina species
complex:€evidence for long-distance
dispersal, and for range expansions
and restricted gene flow in the
northeast Atlantic. Molecular Ecology
17, 3306–3322.
Dunn, C.W., Hejnol, A., Matus, D.Q. et al.
(2008). Broad phylogenomic sampling
improves resolution of the animal tree
of life. Nature 452, 745–750.
Edwards, S.V. (2009). Is a new and general
theory of molecular systematics
emerging? Evolution 63, 1–19.
Emerson, B.C., Hewitt, G.M. (2005).
Phylogeography. Current Biology 15,
R367–R371.
Eyualem Abebe, Decraemer, W., De
Ley, P. (2008). Global diversity of
nematodes (Nematoda) in freshwater.
Hydrobiologia 595, 67–78.
Faurby, S., Jönsson, K.I., Rebecchi, L.,
Funch, P. (2008). Variation and
anhydrobiotic survival of two
eutardigrade morphospecies:€a story
of cryptic species and their dispersal.
Journal of Zoology 275, 139–145.
Fenchel, T., Finlay, B.J. (2004). The ubiquity
of small species:€patterns of local
and global diversity. BioScience 54,
777–784.
Fielding, M.J. (1951). Observations on the
length of dormancy in certain plant
infecting nematodes. Proceedings
of the Helminthological Society of
Washington DC 18, 110–112.
Figuerola, J., Green, A.J., Michot, T.C.
(2005). Invertebrate eggs can
fly:€evidence of waterflow-mediated
gene flow in aquatic invertebrates.
American Naturalist 165, 274–280.
Foissner, W. (2006). Biogeography and
dispersal of micro-organisms:€a
review emphasizing protists. Acta
Protozoologica 45, 111–136.
Foissner, W., Agatha, S., Berger, H. (2002).
Soil ciliates (Protozoa,Ciliophora)
from Namibia (Southwest Africa),
with emphasis on two contrasting
environments, the Etosha Region and
the Namib Desert. Denisia 5, 1–1459.
Fonseca, G., Derycke, S., Moens, T. (2008).
Integrative taxonomy in two freeliving nematode species complexes.
Biological Journal of the Linnean
Society 94, 737–753.
Fontaneto, D., Herniou, E.A., Barraclough,
T.G., Ricci, C. (2007). On the
global distribution of microscopic
animals:€new worldwide data on
bdelloid rotifers. Zoological Studies 46,
336–346.
Fontaneto, D., Barraclough, T.G.,
Kimberly, C., Ricci, C., Herniou,
E.A. (2008a). Molecular evidence for
broad-scale distributions in bdelloid
rotifers:€everything is not everywhere
but most things are very widespread.
Molecular Ecology 17, 3136–3146.
Fontaneto, D., Boschetti, C., Ricci, C.
(2008b). Cryptic diversification in
ancient asexuals:€evidence from the
301
302
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
bdelloid rotifer Philodina flaviceps.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21,
580–587.
Fontaneto, D., Kaya, M., Herniou,
E.A., Barraclough, T.G. (2009).
Extreme levels of hidden diversity
in microscopic animals (Rotifera)
revealed by DNA taxonomy. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 53,
182–189.
Frisch, D., Green, A.J., Figuerola, J. (2007).
High dispersal capacity of a broad
spectrum of aquatic invertebrates
via waterbirds. Aquatic Sciences 69,
568–574.
Garey, J.R., Krotec, M., Nelson, D.R.,
Brooks, J. (1996). Molecular analysis
supports a tardigrade-arthropod
association. Invertebrate Biology 115,
79–88.
Garey, J.R., Nelson, D.R., Mackey, L.J.,
Li, J. (1999). Tardigrade phylogeny:
congruency of morphological and
molecular evidence. Zoological
Anzeiger 238, 205–210.
Giribet, G., Carranza, S., Baguna, J.,
Rintot, M., Ribera, C. (1996). First
molecular evidence for the existence
of a Tardigrada + Arthropoda clade.
Molecular Biology and Evolution 13,
76–84.
Gladyshev, E.A., Meselson, M., Arkhipova,
I.R. (2008). Massive horizontal gene
transfer in bdelloid rotifers. Science
320, 1210–1213.
Gómez, A., Carmona, M.J., Serra, M. (1997).
Ecological factors affecting gene flow
in the Brachionus plicatilis complex
(Rotifera). Oecologia 111, 350–356.
Gómez, A., Serra, M., Carvalho, G.R., Lunt,
D.H. (2002a). Speciation in ancient
cryptic species complexes:€evidence
from the molecular phylogeny of
Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera).
Evolution 56, 1431–1444.
Gómez, A., Adcock, G.J., Lunt, D.H.,
Carvalho, G.R. (2002b). The interplay
between colonisation history and
gene flow in passively dispersing
zooplankton: microsatellite analysis
of rotifer resting egg banks. Journal of
Evolutionary Biology 15, 158–171.
Gómez, S. (2005). Molecular ecology
of rotifers:€from population
differentiation to speciation.
Hydrobiologia 546, 83–99.
Gómez, S., Fleeger, J.W., Rocha, O.A.,
Foltz, D. (2004). Four new species
of Cletocamptus Schmankewitsch,
1875, closely related to Cletocamptus
deitersi (Richard, 1897)
(Copepoda:€Harpacticoida). Journal of
Natural History 38, 2669–2732.
Gómez, S., Montero-Pau, J., Lunt, D.H.,
Serra, M., Campillo, S. (2007).
Persistent genetic signatures
of colonization in Brachionus
manjavacas rotifers in the Iberian
Peninsula. Molecular Ecology 16,
3228–3240.
Guidetti, R., Bertolani, R. (2005).
Tardigrade taxonomy:€an updated
check list of the taxa and a list of
characters for their identification.
Zootaxa 845, 1–46.
Guidetti, R., Jönsson, K.I. (2002). Longterm anhydrobiotic survival in semiterrestrial micrometazoans. Journal of
Zoology 257, 181–187.
Guidetti, R., Gandolfi, A., Rossi, V.,
Bertolani, R. (2005). Phylogenetic
analysis of Macrobiotidae
(Eutardigrada, Parachela):€a combined
morphological and molecular
approach. Zoologica Scripta 34,
235–244.
Guidetti, R., Schill, R.O., Bertolani,
R., Dankekar, T., Wolf, M. (2009).
New molecular data for tardigrade
phylogeny, with the erection of
m o l e c u l a r a p p r o a c h t o m i c r o m e ta z o a n s
Paramacrobiotus gen. nov. Journal
of Zoological Systematics and
Evolutionary Research 47, 315–321.
Guil, N. (2002). Diversity and distribution
of tardigrades (Bilateria, Tardigrada)
from the Iberian Peninsula, Balearic
Islands and Chafarinas Islands.
Graellsia 58, 75–94.
Guil, N. (2008). New records and
within-species variability of Iberian
tardigrades (Tardigrada), with
comments on the species from the
Echiniscus blumi-canadensis series.
Zootaxa 1757, 1–30.
Guil, N., Cabrero-Sañudo, F. (2007).
Analysis of the species description
process for a little known invertebrate
group:€the limnoterrestrial tardigrades
(Bilateria, Tardigrada). Biodiversity
and Conservation 16, 1063–1086.
Guil, N., Giribet, G. (2009). Fine
scale population structure in the
Echiniscus blumi-canadensis series
(Heterotardigrada, Tardigrada) in
an Iberian mountain range€– When
morphology fails to explain genetic
structure. Molecular Phylogenetics and
Evolution 51, 606–613.
Hebert, P.D.N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S.L.,
De Ward, J.R. (2003). Biological
identifications through DNA barcodes.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of
London B 270, 313–321.
Hengherr, S., Brümmer, F., Schill, R.O.
(2008). Anhydrobiosis in tardigrades
and its effects on longevity traits.
Journal of Zoology 275, 216–220.
Hillis, D.M. (2007). Asexual evolution:€can
species exist without sex? Current
Biology 17, R543–R544.
Horikawa, D.D., Higashi, S. (2004).
Desiccation tolerance of the tardigrade
Milnesium tardigradum collected in
Sapporo, Japan, and Bogor, Indonesia.
Zoological Sciences 21, 813–816.
Horikawa, D.D., Sakashita, T., Katagiri, C.
et al. (2006). Radiation tolerance in the
tardigrade Milnesium tardigradum.
International Journal of Radiation
Biology 82, 843–848.
Horikawa, D.D., Kunieda, T., Abe, W. et
al. (2008). Establishment of a rearing
system of the extremotolerant
tardigrade Ramazzottius
varieornatus:€a new model animal for
astrobiology. Astrobiology 8, 549–556.
Huang, Z., Tunnacliffe, A. (2006).
Cryptobiosis, aging, and cancer:€YinYang balancing of signaling networks.
Rejuvenation Research 9, 292–296.
Janiec, K. (1996). Short distance wind
transport of microfauna in maritime
Antarctic (King George Island,
South Shetland Islands). Polish Polar
Research 17, 203–211.
Jenkins, D.G., Underwood, M.O. (1998).
Zooplankton may not disperse
readily in wind, rain, or waterfowl.
Hydrobiologia 387/388, 15–21.
Jönsson, K.I., Schill, R.O. (2007). Induction
of Hsp70 by desiccation, ionising
radiation and heat-shock in the
eutardigrade Richtersius coronifer.
Comparative Biochemistry and
Physiology Part B 146, 456–460.
Jönsson, K.I., Borsari, S., Rebecchi,
L. (2001). Anydrobiotic survival
in populations of the tardigrades
Richtersius coronifer and Ramazzottius
oberhaeuseri from Italy and Sweden.
Zoologischer Anzeiger 240, 419–423.
Jönsson, K.I., Harms-Ringdhal, M.,
Torudd, J. (2005). Radiation tolerance
in the eutardigrade Richtersius
coronifer. International Journal of
Radiation Biology 81, 649–656.
Jönsson, K.I., Rabbow, E., Schill, R.O.,
Brümmer, F. (2008). Tardigrades
survive exposure to space in low Earth
orbit. Current Biology 18, R729–R731.
303
304
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Jørgensen, A., Kristensen, R.M. (2004).
Molecular phylogeny of Tardigrada€–
investigation of the monophyly
of Heterotardigrada. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 32,
666–670.
Jørgensen, A., Møbjerg, N., Kristensen,
R.M. (2007). A molecular study of
the tardigrade Echiniscus testudo
(Echiniscidae) reveals low DNA
sequence diversity over a large
geographical area. Journal of
Limnology 66, 77–83.
Katz, L.A., McManus, G.B., SnoeyenbosWest, O.L.O. et al. (2005). Reframing
the ‘Everything is everywhere’
debate:€evidence for high gene flow
and diversity in ciliate morphospecies.
Aquatic Microbial Ecology 41, 55–65.
Kaya, M., Herniou, E.A., Barraclough, T.G.,
Fontaneto, D. (2009). Inconsistent
estimates of diversity between
traditional and DNA taxonomy in
bdelloid rotifers. Organisms, Diversity
and Evolution 9, 3–12.
Leasi, F., Todaro, M.A. (2009). Meiofaunal
cryptic species revealed by confocal
microscopy:€the case of Xenotrichula
intermedia (Gastrotricha). Marine
Biology 156, 1335–1346.
Li, X., Wang, L. (2005). Effect of thermal
acclimation on preferred temperature,
avoidance temperature and lethal
thermal maximum of Macrobiotus
harmsworthi Murray (Tardigrada,
Macrobiotidae). Journal of Thermal
Biology 30, 443–448.
Lohse, K. (2009). Can mtDNA barcodes be
used to delimit species? A response to
Pons et al. (2006). Systematics Biology
58, 439–442.
McInnes, S.J. (1994). Zoogeographic
distribution of terrestrial/freshwater
tardigrades from current literature.
Journal of Natural History 28, 257–352.
McSorley, R. (2003). Adaptations of
nematodes to environmental
extremes. Florida Entomologist 86,
138–142.
Mills, S., Lunt, D.H., Gómez, A. (2007).
Global isolation by distance despite
strong regional phylogeography in a
small metazoan. BMC Evolutionary
Biology 7, 225.
Mitchell, C.R., Romano, F.A. (2007). Sexual
dimorphism, population dynamics
and some aspects of life history of
Echiniscus mauccii (Tardigrada;
Heterotardigrada). Journal of
Limnology 66, 126–131.
Møbjerg, N., Jørgensen, A.,EibyeJacobsen, J. et al. (2007). New records
on cyclomorphosis in the marine
eutardigrade Halobiotus crispae
(Eutardigrada:€Hypsibiidae). Journal of
Limnology 66, 132–140.
Moritz, C., Cicero, C. (2004). DNA
barcoding:€promise and pitfalls. PLoS
Biology 2, 1529–1531.
Muñóz, J., Felicisimo, A.M., Cabezas, F.,
Burgaz, A.R., Martinez, I. (2004). Wind
as a long-distance dispersal vehicle in
the southern hemisphere. Science 304,
1144–1147.
Naihong, X., Audenaert, E., Vanoverbeke,€J.
et al. (2000). Low among-population
genetic differentiation in Chinese
bisexual Artemia populations. Heredity
84, 238–243.
Neumann, S., Reuner, A., Brümmer,€F.,
Schill, R.O. (2009). DNA damage
in storage cells of anhydrobiotic
tardigrades. Comparative
Biochemistry and Physiology Part A
Molecular and Integrative Physiology
153, 425–429.
Nichols, P.B., Nelson, D.R., Garey, J.R.
(2006). A family level analysis of
tardigrade phylogeny. Hydrobiologia
558, 53–60.
m o l e c u l a r a p p r o a c h t o m i c r o m e ta z o a n s
Nieberding, C., Libois, R., Douady, C.J.,
Morand, S., Michaux, R. (2005).
Phylogeography of a nematode
(Heligmosomoides polygyrus) in the
western Palearctic region:€persistence
of northern cryptic populations
during ice ages? Molecular Ecology 14,
765–779.
Palsson, S. (2000). Microsatellite variation
in Daphnia pulex from both sides of
the Baltic sea. Molecular Ecology 9,
1075–1088.
Papadopoulou, A., Monaghan, M.T.,
Barraclough, T.G., Vogler, A.P. (2009).
Sampling error does not invalidate
the Yule-Coalescent Model for species
delimitation. A response to Lohse
(2009). Systematic Biology 58, 442–444.
Pons, J., Barraclough, T.G., Gomez-Zurita,
J. et al. (2006). Sequence-based species
delimitation for the DNA taxonomy
of undescribed insects. Systematic
Biology 55, 595–610.
Ramazzotti, G., Maucci, W. (1983). Il
phylum Tardigrada. III Edizione
riveduta e aggiornata. Memorie
dell’Istituto Italiano di Idrobiologia
Dott. Marco de Marchi 41, 1–1012.
Ramløv, H., Westh, P. (2001). Cryptobiosis
in the eutardigrade Adorybiotus
(Richtersius) coronifer:€tolerance to
alcohols, temperature and de novo
protein synthesis. Zoologischer
Anzeiger 240, 517–523.
Rebecchi, L., Altiero, T., Guidetti, R. (2007).
Anhydrobiosis:€the extreme limit of
desiccation tolerance. Invertebrate
Survival Journal 4, 65–81.
Rebecchi, L., Guidetti, R., Borsari, S.,
Altiero, T., Bertolani, R. (2006).
Dynamics of longterm anhydrobiotic
survival of lichen-dwelling
tardigrades. Hydrobiologia 558, 23–30.
Rebecchi, L., Altiero, T., Guidetti, R. et al.
(2009). Tardigrade resistance space
effect:€first results of experiments
on the LIFE-TARSE Mission on
FOTON-M3 (September 2007).
Astrobiology 9, 581–591.
Regier, J.C., Shultz, J.W., Kambic, R.E.,
Nelson, D.R. (2003). Robust support
for tardigrade clades and their ages
from three protein-coding nuclear
genes. Invertebrate Biology 123,
93–100.
Ricci, C., Balsamo, M. (2000). The biology
and ecology of lotic rotifers and
gastrotrichs. Freshwater Biology 44,
15–28.
Ricci, C., Caprioli, M. (2005).
Anhydrobiosis in bdelloid species,
populations and individuals.
Integrative and Comparative Biology
45, 759–763.
Ricci, C., Fontaneto, D. (2009).
The importance of being a
bdelloid:€ecological and evolutionary
consequences of dormancy. Italian
Journal of Zoology 76, 240–249.
Ricci, C., Melone, G., Santo, D.,
Caprioli, M. (2008). Morphological
response of a bdelloid rotifer to
desiccation.€Journal of Morphology
257, 246–253.
Sands, C.J., McInnes, S.J., Marley, N.J.
et€al . (2008a). Phylum Tardigrada:€an
‘‘individual’’ approach. Cladistics 24,
861–871.
Sands, C.J., Convey, P., Linse, K., McInnes,
S.J. (2008b). Assessing meiofaunal
variation among individuals utilising
morphological and molecular
approaches:€an example using the
Tardigrada. BMC Ecology 8, 7.
Schill, R.O., Steinbruck, G. (2007).
Identification and differentiation
of€Heterotardigrada and Eutardigrada
species by riboprinting. Journal
of Zoological Systematics and
Evolutionary Research 45, 184–190.
305
306
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Schill, R., Neumann, S., Reuner, A.,
Brümmer, F. (2008). Detection of
DNA damage with single-cell gel
electrophoresis in anhydrobiotic
tardigrades. Comparative Biochemistry
and Physiology Part A Molecular and
Integrative Physiology 151, 32.
Schurko, A.M., Neiman, M., Logsdon, J.M.
(2008). Signs of sex:€what we know and
how we know it. Trends in Ecology and
Evolution 24, 208–217.
Schwerdtfeger, F. (1975). Synökologie.
Hamburg: P. Parey.
Segers, H., De Smet, W.H. (2008). Diversity
and endemism in Rotifera:€a review,
and Kerarella Bory de St Vincent.
Biodiversity and Conservation 17,
303–316.
Serra, M., Gómez, A., Carmona, M.J.
(1998). Ecological genetics of
Brachionus sympatric sibling species.
Hydrobiologia 388, 373–384.
Suatoni, E., Vicario, S., Rice, S., Snell, T.,
Caccone, A. (2006). An analysis of
species boundaries and biogeographic
patterns in a cryptic species
complex:€the rotifer–Brachionus
plicatilis. Molecular Phylogenetics and
Evolution 41, 86–98.
Sudzuki, M. (1972). An analysis of
colonization in freshwater microorganisms. II. Two simple experiments
on the dispersal by wind. Japanese
Journal of Ecology 22, 222–225.
Todaro, M.A., Fleeger, J.W., Hu, Y.P.,
Hrincevich, A.W., Foltz, D.W. (1996).
Are meiofaunal species cosmopolitan?
Morphological and molecular
analyses of Xenotrichula intermedia
(Gastrotricha:€Chaetonotida). Marine
Biology 125, 735–742.
Valentini, A., Pompanon, F., Taberlet, P.
(2009). DNA barcoding for ecologists.
Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24,
110–117.
Watanabe, M., Kikawada, T., Fujita, A.
et al. (2004). Physiological traits of
invertebrates entering cryptobiosis
in a post-embryonic stage. European
Journal of Entomology 101, 439–444.
Westheide, W., Schmidt, H. (2003).
Cosmopolitan versus cryptic
meiofaunal polychaete species. An
approach to a molecular taxonomy.
Helgoland Marine Research 57, 1–6.
Wiens, J. (2007). Species delimitation:
new approaches for discovering
diversity. Systematics Biology 56,
875–879.
Wright, J.C. (1991). The significance of
four xeric parameters in the ecology
of terrestrial Tardigrada. Journal of
Zoology 224, 59–77.
Wright, J.C. (2001). Cryptobiosis 300 years
on from van Leuwenhoek:€What
have we learned about tardigrades?
Zoologischer Anzeiger 240, 563–582.
Wright, J.C., Westh, P., Ramløv, H. (1992).
Cryptobiosis in Tardigrada. Biological
Reviews 67, 1–29.
Wright, S. (1921). Systems of mating.
Genetics 6, 111–178.
Part V
Processes
15
Microbes as a test of biogeographic
principles
David G. Jenkins1, Kim A. Medley 1 and
Rima B. Franklin2
Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA
Department of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA
1╇
2╇
15.1╇ Introduction
In the hierarchy of scientific knowledge, a principle, rule or law describes consistent observations and precedes hypothesis and theory. Given consistent observations, other information or insight may suggest mechanisms, and a hypothesis
can be formed. For example, the first principle of biogeography, Buffon’s law, states
that disjunct regions have distinct species assemblages despite similar environments. Buffon proposed a mechanism to explain biogeographic patterns:€ that
species ‘improve’ or ‘degenerate’ according to their environment. Given generality and often incorporating multiple facets, a theory may emerge that explains the
patterns well (e.g. evolutionary theory).
As in ecology, biogeographic principles may include speculations that ‘have
often been elevated to laws merely by the passing of time’ (Loehle, 1987). Tests of
Biogeography of Microscopic Organisms: Is Everything Small Everywhere?, ed. Diego Fontaneto.
Published by Cambridge University Press. © The Systematics Association 2011.
310
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
biogeographic laws/principles/rules are thus valuable for biogeography in general
and for understanding the tested system.
In that context, the statement for microbes that ‘Everything is everywhere,
but the environment selects’ (Finlay, 2002; de Wit and Bouvier, 2006; hereafter
abbreviated as EiE) is valuable to test the generality of biogeography’s prinÂ�ciples
and their hypothesised mechanisms. Generality is tested best by extremes,
and microbes (defined here as < ~1–2â•›m m; Finlay, 2002) certainly represent the
lower margin of body size for most biogeographic evidence because most biogeography research has been conducted with macrobes (defined here as larger
than 1–2â•›m m; Finlay, 2002). According to EiE, microbes have no biogeographic
pattern due to their enormous population sizes and high probability of ubiquitous dispersal (Finlay, 2002). If so, then biogeographic principles derived from
macrobes are not general, and subsequent hypotheses and theory must be also
be constrained. In addition, the EiE claim tests biogeographic principles because
EiE argues that macrobes have biogeographies (Finlay, 2002). The EiE claim is
thus double-edged because it also expects definitive patterns (laws, principles or
rules) for macrobes.
In this chapter we evaluate the evidence for biogeographic principles of macrobes and the extension of those principles to microbes. We do not claim to have
found all literature on this rather broad topic, though we conducted a thorough
literature search. Specifically, we evaluate the evidence that:
(1) Abundance, body size and distribution are inter-related for both macrobes
and microbes.
(2) Niche affects spatial distribution for both macrobes and microbes.
(3) Microbes and small macrobes have phylogeographies (i.e. geographic pattern
in phylogenetic structure).
Topics 1 and 2 address mechanisms (e.g. high abundance causes a large
range), while topic 3 is about biogeographic patterns that may result from
multiple mechanisms. These topics are important to biogeography (Lomolino
et€ al., 2006) and have not been explored for microbial biogeography, while
other related topics have been explored. For example, Green and Bohannan
(2006) focused on questions of spatial scale (greater community dissimilarity
with greater distance, taxa–area relationships and the ratio of local:global taxa
richness). Martiny et€a l. (2006) considered non-random spatial distributions of
microbes and general approaches to examine contemporary and/or historical
processes acting on microbial community structure. Others have considered
speciation and extinction rates (e.g. Horner-Devine et al., 2004; Ramette and
Tiedje, 2007) but concluded that too few data exist, especially for extinction
rates.
microbes as a test of biogeogr a phic principles
15.2╇ Abundance, body size and distribution
Abundance is important to ecological, biogeographic and macroecological concepts. Here we focus on three abundance relationships:€abundant–centre, abundance–range and size–abundance.
15.2.1╇ Abundant–centre
According to the abundant–centre principle, a species reaches its greatest local
abundance near its range centre, related to increasingly detrimental conditions
toward its range edge (Andrewartha and Birch, 1954; Whittaker, 1956; Westman,
1980; Hengeveld and Haeck, 1982; Brown, 1984; Brown et€al., 1995; Thomas and
Kunin, 1999; Gaston, 2003). This relationship has been influential in ecology and
biogeography (Sagarin et€ al., 2006) and assumes that a species’ range is determined by environmental conditions, that the species’ range has an edge, and that
the range is roughly equilibrial. These assumptions are most likely true for native
species inhabiting a relatively stable landscape, but may not be expected for native
species during climate change, for an invasive species still expanding its non�native range, or in the case of invasional ratcheting, in which an invasive species
adapts to a new range and then is re-introduced to its native region and expands
that native range (Medley, 2010).
Evidence for the abundant–centre relationship was reviewed by Sagarin and
Gaines (2002). They found only 39% of studies support the relationship and concluded that ‘more exploration of species’ abundance distributions is necessary’,
including more sampling near range edges. The abundant–centre principle is better characterised as an assumption than as a principle for macrobes (Sagarin and
Gaines, 2002; Sagarin et€al., 2006).
The EiE claim for cosmopolitan distributions and ‘astronomical’ abundances
of microbes (Finlay, 2002) translates to an expectation that microbes do not
decline in abundance from range centre to range edge (no range edge exists for
cosmopolitan species). Most biogeographic information has been collected for
macrobes, so it should be no surprise that less is known about the distribution of
abundance across microbial species ranges. The best example we could find for
microbes was that of Krasnov et€al. (2008), in which fleas and mites on Palearctic
small mammals tended to correspond to the expected abundant–centre pattern for macrobes. However, parasitic organisms have been excluded from the
EiE claim (Finlay, 2002; Finlay and Fenchel, 2004) because patterns should mirror host patterns, plus Krasnov et€al. (2008) demonstrated that the patterns are
likely affected by other factors. We conclude that the abundant–centre ‘principle’
can hardly be considered definitive for macrobes, and is far less understood for
microbes.
311
312
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
15.2.2╇ Abundance–range and size–abundance
The abundance–range principle holds that species with greater local abundance
have greater distributional ranges, and has been considered a generality among
diverse macrobes (e.g. Andrewartha and Birch, 1954; Blackburn et€ al., 1997;
Gaston et€ al., 1997; Hubbell, 2001; Harte et€ al., 2001). The EiE claim is a corollary of this principle because microbial species can attain ‘astronomical’ local
abundance and thus are argued to have very large (i.e. cosmopolitan) distributions (Finlay, 2002). As described above for the abundant–centre principle, the
EiE claim essentially states that the abundance-range principle is saturated for
microbes. Likewise, a negative relationship between body size and local abundance is regarded as well-supported for macrobes (Damuth, 1987; Brown et€al.,
1995) and is consistent with EiE (Finlay, 2002). This principle has the advantage
that it is intuitive, in that many microbes can be visualised as fitting into the space
occupied by one macrobe.
Given that abundance appears to be positively related to range area and
that body size is logically and negatively related to abundance, then body size
should be negatively related to range area (smaller organisms should have
larger ranges; Fig 15.1). In addition, this relationship should apply to macrobes and microbes. However, this does not seem to be the case. Most (80%) of
macrobial studies reviewed by Gaston (1996) observed a positive relationship
between body size and range, rather than a negative relationship as predicted
by the combination of the abundance–range and size–abundance principles.
We know of no comparable data to evaluate the size–range relationship among
microbes, but a random pattern may be expected (Martiny et€al., 2006; Jenkins
et€al., 2007).
What may reconcile the contrast between individual well-founded prin�
ciples and observations of their combination? A negative size–range relationship requires only simple diffusive (random) dispersal because no factors are
needed to explain the pattern other than a density-dependent probability of
dispersal from a local population into the surrounding landscape. This relationship should be most appropriate for passive dispersers, including freeliving microbes that are the focus of the EiE claim (Finlay, 2002). On the other
hand, actively dispersing organisms (typically macrobes) have a positive
size–range relationship (Gaston, 1996). As evidence to support this difference
between passive and active dispersers, maximal observed dispersal distance is
a random function of body size for passive dispersers, while dispersal distance
increases with body size for active dispersers (Jenkins et€al., 2007). Maximal
observed dispersal distance is relevant to range area but should be more proximal to dispersal-based differences among organisms because many other
microbes as a test of biogeogr a phic principles
Fig 15.1 Interrelationships between abundance, body size and range. Microbial
organisms are indicated with the open circle on each plot. (A) Logic and evidence
support the negative relationship between body size and local abundance (Damuth,
1987; Brown et al., 1995). (B) The positive relationship between local abundance and
range size is also well documented for macrobes (Gaston et al., 1997). (C) Given A and B,
then smaller organisms that have larger local abundance should also have larger range
sizes, whereas larger organisms with less abundance should have smaller range sizes
(dashed line). In fact, the opposite (solid line) is well documented for macrobes (Gaston,
1996).
�
factors
(e.g. landscape heterogeneity, climate, biological interactions) also may
affect range area.
Our brief evaluation of abundance, body size and distribution for microbes
and macrobes suggests that dispersal mode (passive vs. active) actually causes
observed patterns, rather than simple body size per EiE. Overall, the macrobial
and microbial evidence for abundance, body size and distribution do not support
the EiE claim because the principles for macrobes are not definitive and because
the evidence for microbes is grossly inadequate at this time.
313
314
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
15.3╇ Niche and distribution
The ecological niche has been conceptually related to organismal distributions for nearly a century (Grinnell, 1917) and niche-based distribution models continue to be important for predicting biogeographic distributions (Wiley
et€ al., 2003; Reed et€ al., 2008; Kearney and Porter, 2009; Medley, 2010). Much
has been written about the niche concept (see reviews by Pulliam, 2002; Chase
and Leibold, 2003; Colwell and Rangel, 2009; Soberón and Nakamura, 2009).
The niche is classically related to distribution in terms of the fundamental
niche, defined as the multidimensional space within which a species can attain
positive population growth. When the fundamental niche is projected onto
geographic space, species occupy that subset of the fundamental niche that
is actually available at a given space and time (potential niche, Jackson and
Overpeck, 2000; Soberón and Nakamura, 2009). Finally, additional constraints
by biotic interactions yield the realised niche (Hutchinson, 1957; Pulliam, 2002;
Colwell and Rangel, 2009; Soberón and Nakamura, 2009). These niche concepts
do not incorporate other processes (e.g. source–sink dynamics, dispersal limitation) that appear to also affect distributions (Fig 15.2; after Pulliam, 2002).
The EiE claim (‘… but the environment selects’; Fig 15.2A) is consistent with the
Grinnelian niche concept, or the Hutchinsonian niche concept if biotic interactions further limit distributions (Fig 15.2B). However, alternative mechanisms
of source–sink dynamics (Fig 15.2C) or dispersal limitation (Fig 15.2D) are
inconsistent with EiE because microbial species are presumed to be uniformly
abundant and cosmopolitan (Finlay, 2002).
What evidence exists that the niche affects microbial distributions? We
surveyed the literature for studies examining either niche or distribution for
organisms with propagules < 1–2â•›m m. While many studies report ecological
differences between species, we focused our search on those studies of quantitative niche characteristics that cause spatial segregation between species or
result in apparent distributional boundaries at some scale. All studies we found
consistently reported niche differences or local adaptation at intra- or interspecific levels, consistent with the fundamental niche in all cases and potentially related to the realised niche in a few cases (Table 15.1). Given that niche
constraints on local persistence/occurrence have been observed for microbes,
it is reasonable to expect that niche affects distribution of multiple microbial
species, consistent with the ‘environment selects’ portion of the EiE claim (and
with much of evolutionary ecology). Tests for source–sink dynamics or dispersal limitation as alternative explanations of microbial niche-distribution
relationships will require that the fundamental niche for a species is already
microbes as a test of biogeogr a phic principles
0
1 1
0
1
1
0 1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0 1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
Environmental
component 1
0
0
D
1
0
Environmental
component 1
0
1
1
0
0
Environmental
component 2
Environmental
component 2
1
1
1
1
1 1
0
0
0
1
0
Environmental
component 1
C
0
1 1
0
0
0
B
0
Environmental
component 2
Environmental
component 2
A
0
0
0
0
Environmental
component 1
Fig 15.2 Niche-distribution relationships, based on Pulliam (2002). Zeros represent
absence, and ones represent presence in niche space (e.g. two ordination axes). (A)€The
fundamental (Grinnellian) niche (or potential niche, Jackson and Overpeck, 2000;
Soberón and Nakamura, 2009) is related to abiotic interactions. (B) The realised niche
(sensu Hutchinson) is due to the combined influence of abiotic and biotic interactions,
where the dashed line represents niche space of a second species. (C) Source–sink
dynamics represent one alternative to (A) and (B), where sink populations outside the
fundamental (or realised) niche exist due to immigration from source populations.
(D) Dispersal limitation is a second alternative, where some combinations of
environmental components have not been colonised, even within the fundamental
niche space.
well characterised and that multiple sites within and beyond that niche space
are thoroughly sampled for microbes and environmental conditions (Fig 15.2).
Such data do not yet exist, but may soon be approached for marine microbes
in the form of the International Census of Marine Microbes (ICoMM; http://
icomm.mbl.edu/microbis/).
315
Approach
O
E
E
E
E
Habitat 1
M
F
F
F
F and T
Taxon
Euchaeta
norvegica, Calanus
finmarchicus,
Pleuromamma
robusta, Metrida
lucens (copepods)
Balanion
planctonicum,
Urotricha farcta,
U.€furcata (ciliates)
Cephalodella hoodi,
Elosa worallii
(rotifers)
Actinobacteria
(bacteria)
Spumella sp.
(chrysophyte
flagellate)
2
Temperature
(growth rate)
Temperature
Temperature,
food, and
predation
Temperature
and food
(growth rate)
Abundance
Niche-related
traits measured
Weithoff
(2004)
Vertical niche
separation related to
temperature and food
0.008
(vertical
samples)
17â•›000
Local thermal
adaptation among
strains
Boenigk
et€al. (2007)
Hahn and
Pöckl (2005)
Weisse et al.
(2001)
Niche differentiation
within and between
competing species
and genera
700
Local thermal
adaptation; identical
16S sequences but
some genetic variation
at other loci
Williams
(1988)
Species partition
niches in horizontal
and vertical space
North
Atlantic
Ocean
13â•›000
Source
Conclusions
Approximate
spatial scale
(km)
Table 15.1 Example evidence of niche differences resulting in spatial discontinuity for microbial species or genera with body sizes
<€~1–2â•›m m. Niche differences have been demonstrated for diverse microbes at multiple scales and using both experimental and
observational evidence.
E and O
O
F
F
Daphnia magna
(cladoceran)
diatoms, rotifers,
crustacean
zooplankton,
aquatic insects
2
Habitats:€F:€Freshwater, M:€Marine, T:€Terrestrial.
Study Approach:€E:€Experimental, O:€Observational.
O
M
Micromonas pusilla
(chlorophyte
flagellate)
1
O
F
Sellaphora pupula,
S. bacillum,
S. laevissima
(diatoms)
multiple
physicalchemical and
biotic variables
Ca++, pH
requirements
Genetic
differentiation
Trophic status
of local habitat
Experimental niche
accurately predicted
56 of 58 occurrences
in Europe
Local habitat variables
and regional location
determine community
structure.
3000
Niche partitioning
evident for this
widely distributed
morphospecies
Sellaphora demes
(putative species)
differ in environmental
tolerances
600
12500
600
Kernan et al.
(2009)
Hooper et al.
(2008)
Foulon et al.
(2008)
Poulíčková
et al. (2008)
318
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
15.4╇ Microbial phylogeographies
Phylogeography is pattern analysis that indicates evolutionary processes in
space and time, and thus enables phylogenetic and geographic history to be
evaluated as a potential mechanism of microbial biogeography. In contrast to
the large body of knowledge on macrobe biogeography (e.g. Lomolino et€ al.,
2006), EiE argues that the high dispersal rates and frequent dispersal events of
microbes swamp any spatial structure that may otherwise arise through vicariance, historical dispersal and local adaptation. Given the repeated reshuffle of
microbial populations predicted by EiE, phylogeographic patterns concordant
with geological processes of plate tectonics, glaciations, geographic barriers,
etc. should not apply because phylogeography should be swamped by contemporary dispersal.
According to the EiE claim, microbes do not have biogeographies while macrobes do. Finlay (2002) presented the 1â•›m m cutoff between microbes and macrobes
as two mirror-image, logistic curves (Fig 15.3A); the proportion of species that
are ubiquitous purportedly decreases abruptly at ~1â•›m m (dashed line, Fig 15.3A),
while the proportion of species that have biogeographies increases abruptly at
~1â•›m m (solid line, Fig 15.3B). Because these two curves are mirror images, we can
focus here on the curve for species with biogeographies, with the understanding
that evidence for one curve necessarily provides evidence for the other. In addition, Finlay (2002) stated that ubiquity–biogeography transition should be in the
1–10â•›m m size range.
We tested Finlay’s clear and specific prediction (Fig 15.3A) for the presence
of a logistic function in the proportion of species with biogeographies and a
transition in the 1–10â•›m m size range. Phylogeography studies focus on closely
related lineages and provide specific tests of the EiE claim that microbes
do not have biogeographies. We collected 51 phylogeographic studies published in the peer-reviewed literature (1998–2009) of organisms for which
the dispersive life stage is < 10â•›m m. All studies applied molecular phylogeographic approaches at regional to global spatial scales and included Archaea,
Bacteria, Protista, fungi, bryophytes, Rotifera, Annelida, Mollusca, Copepoda
and Cladocera.
We evaluated the evidence by recording whether or not the authors concluded
that the subject species had phylogeographies (1 = yes, 0 = no). We then computed
a logistic regression of those binary conclusions as a function of body size to estimate the probability of a biogeography for a given body size. If Finlay’s prediction is correct, a significant logistic function with a transition ~1–10â•›m m should be
observed. The alternative null model (i.e. biogeography is not a function of body
size) is a linear fit that has no significant slope but a significant intercept.
microbes as a test of biogeogr a phic principles
% Species with biogeographies
A
Macrobes
Microbes
~1 mm
B
1
Prob. of biogeography
0.8
0.6
0.4
Logistic regression:
Slope not significant (p=0.785)
Linear regression:
slope not significant (p=0.790)
intercept = 0.87 (p<0.0001)
0.2
0
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
log (propagule size, mm)
Fig 15.3 Size-based expectations and empirical results from the ‘Everything is everywhere’
claim (EiE; Finlay, 2002). (A) Microbes and macrobes present mirror-image trends in the
predicted proportion of species that have biogeographies (from Finlay, 2002). We tested
evidence for the macrobe curve (solid line) in empirical phylogeographies. (B) Empirical
patterns, where circles represent conclusions by phylogeography study authors for the
study organism’s propagule size (0:€no biogeography observed; 1:€biogeography observed;
N = 51).
Forty-four of the 51 papers concluded that studied organisms had biogeog�
raphies, while only seven of 51 found no evidence for biogeographic structure (Fig
15.3B). A logistic regression did not significantly fit the data (p = 0.785), nor did a
linear regression have a significant slope (p = 0.790), though the linear regression
did have a significant intercept (βâ•›0 = 0.87, p < 0.0001). Thus, evidence we found
319
320
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
indicates that microbes (< ~1â•›m m) are just as likely to exhibit biogeographies as
macrobes, and that there is no support for the logistic, mirror-imaged distinction
between ubiquitous microbes vs. macrobes with biogeographies.
Phylogeographies may arise by multiple mechanisms, but the fact that they
are repeatedly observed for microbes is strong evidence that the same biogeographic mechanisms (e.g. vicariance, dispersal, speciation, adaptation, extinction) that affect macrobes also affect microbes. A more interesting challenge is
to learn why some microbial species are widespread while others are not. To
begin to address this challenge we will need to move beyond simple size-based
distinctions and take account of life-history traits more likely to be related to
dispersal (e.g. active or passive mode, dormancy, adaptations for phoretic transport) and success upon arrival (abiotic tolerance limits, nutrient requirements,
trophic interactions, etc.).
In summary, we conclude that:
nn Too
few data exist to evaluate relationships between abundance, body size and
distribution for microbes, and remain unclear (in part) for macrobes. Thus,
the EiE claim is not supported for these basic components of biogeography.
However, the EiE claim has been useful for biogeographic principles because
it led to consideration of relationships for macrobes and microbes and revealed
potential new research directions.
nn Evidence
exists for fundamental niche constraints in microbes, plus some
evidence for realised niche constraints. Niche-distribution relationships
that are consistent with the EiE claim await more extensive and intensive
sampling to fully characterise the role of niche in affecting microbial distributions. As for macrobes, we expect niche-distribution relationships
will be found to constrain some microbes to distributions that are less than
cosmopolitan.
nn Most
(86%) of phylogeographic analyses do not support the EiE claim that
microbes have no biogeography. Contrary to the EiE prediction that the proportion of species with biogeographies declines logistically ~1–10â•›m m in body size,
no such trend was observed among empirical data sets.
nn The
EiE claim has helped turn biogeographic research attention to small
organisms, especially in its recent revival during the era of molecular systematics. We expect that the stark contrasts in the EiE claim will be replaced
over time with more sophisticated understanding of patterns and processes
that more fully reflect Nature’s complexity. The clear and simple EiE claim
will likely give way to a more nuanced but representative understanding of
microbial biogeography that is based on more salient metrics than body size
alone.
microbes as a test of biogeogr a phic principles
References
Andrewartha, H.G., Birch, L.C. (1954).
The Distribution and Abundance of
Animals. Chicago, IL:€University of
Chicago Press.
Blackburn, T.M., Gaston, K.J., Quinn,
R.M., Arnold, H., Gregory, R.D. (1997).
Of mice and wrens:€the relation
between abundance and geographic
range size in British mammals and
birds. Philosophical Transactions of
the Royal Society of London B 352,
419–427.
Boenigk, J., Jost, S., Stoeck, T., Garstecki,
T. (2007). Differential thermal
adaptation of clonal strains of a
protist morphospecies originating
from different climatic zones.
Environmental Microbiology 9,
593–602.
Brown, J. H. (1984). On the relationship
between abundance and distribution
of species. American Naturalist 124,
255–279.
Brown, J.H., Mehlman, D.W., Stevens, G.C.
(1995). Spatial variation in abundance.
Ecology 76, 2028–2043.
Chase, J.M., Leibold, M.A. (2003).
Ecological Niches:€Linking Classical
and Contemporary Approaches.
Chicago, IL:€University of Chicago
Press.
Colwell, R. K., Rangel, T.F. (2009).
Hutchinson’s duality:€The once and
future niche. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences USA 106,
19651–19658.
Damuth, J. (1987). Interspecific allometry
of population density in mammals
and other animals:€the independence
of body mass and population energy
use. Biological Journal of the Linnean
Society 31, 193–246.
de Wit, R., Bouvier, T. (2006). ‘Everything
is everywhere, but the environment
selects’; what did Baas Becking and
Beijerinck really say? Environmental
Microbiology 8, 755–758.
Finlay, B.J. (2002). Global dispersal of freeliving microbial eukaryote species.
Science 296, 1061–1063.
Finlay, B.J., Fenchel, T. (2004)
Cosmopolitan metapopulations of
free-living microbial eukaryotes.
Protist 155, 237–244.
Foulon, E., Not, F., Jalabert, F., Cariou,€T.
et€al. (2008). Ecological niche
partitioning in the picoplanktonic
green alga Micromonas
pusilla:€evidence from environmental
surveys using phylogenetic probes.
Environmental Microbiology 10,
2433–2443.
Gaston, K.J. (1996). Species–range-size
distributions:€patterns, mechanisms
and implications. Trends in Ecology
and Evolution 11, 197–201.
Gaston, K.J. (2003). The Structure and
Dynamics of Geographic Ranges. New
York, NY:€Oxford University Press.
Gaston, K.J., Blackburn, T.M., Lawton, J.H.
(1997). Interspecific abundance–range
size€relationships:€an appraisal of
mechanisms. Journal of Animal
Ecology 66, 579–601.
Green, J., Bohannan, B.J.M. (2006). Spatial
scaling in microbial biodiversity.
Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21,
501–507.
Grinnell, J. (1917). The niche-relationships
of the California Thrasher. The Auk 34,
427–433.
Hahn, M.W., Pöckl, M . (2005). Ecotypes
of planktonic actinobacteria with
identical 16s rrna genes adapted
321
322
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
to thermal niches in temperate,
subtropical, and tropical freshwater
habitats. Applied and Environmental
Microbiology 71, 766–773.
Harte, J., Blackburn, T., Ostling, A. (2001).
Self-similarity and the relationship
between abundance and range size.
American Naturalist 157, 374–386.
Hengeveld, R., Haeck, J. (1982).
The distribution of abundance.
I. Measurements. Journal of
Biogeography 9, 303–316.
Hooper, H.L., Connon, R., Callaghan, A.,
Fryer, G. et€al. (2008). The ecological
niche of Daphnia magna characterized
using population growth rate. Ecology
89, 1015–1022.
Horner-Devine, M.C., Lage, M., Hughes,
J.B., Bohannan, B.J. (2004). A taxa–area
relationship for bacteria. Nature 432,
750–753.
Hubbell, S.P. (2001). The Unified
Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and
Biogeography. Princeton, NJ:€Princeton
University Press.
Hutchinson, G.E. (1957). Concluding
remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium
on Quantitative Biology 22, 415–427.
Jackson, S.T., Overpeck, J.T. (2000).
Responses of plant populations and
communities to environmental
changes of the late Quaternary.
Paleobiology 26 (Suppl), 194–220.
Jenkins, D.G., Brescacin, C.R., Duxbury,
C.V. et€al. (2007). Does size matter for
dispersal distance? Global Ecology and
Biogeography 16, 415–425.
Kearney, M., Porter, W. (2009). Mechanistic
niche modelling:€combining
physiological and spatial data to
predict species ranges. Ecology Letters
12, 334–350.
Kernan, M., Ventura, M., Bitušík,
P., Brancelj, A. et€al. (2009).
Regionalisation of remote European
mountain lake ecosystems according
to their biota:€environmental versus
geographical patterns. Freshwater
Biology 54, 2470–2493.
Krasnov, B.R., Shenbrot, G.I.,
Khokhlova, I.S., Vinarski, M. et€al.
(2008). Geographical patterns of
abundance:€testing expectations of
the ‘abundance optimum’ model in
two taxa of ectoparasitic arthropods.
Journal of Biogeography 35, 2187–2194.
Loehle, C. (1987). Hypothesis testing in
ecology:€psychological aspects and
the importance of theory maturation.
Quarterly Review of Biology 62,
397–409.
Lomolino, M.V., Riddle, B.R., Brown, J.H.
(2006). Biogeography, 3rd Edition.
Sunderland, MA:€Sinauer Associates.
Martiny, J.B.H., Bohannan, B.,
Brown, J. et€al. (2006) Microbial
biogeography:€putting
microorganisms on the map. Nature
Reviews Microbiology 4, 102–112.
Medley, K.A. (2010). Niche shifts during
the global invasion of the Asian tiger
mosquito, Aedes albopictus Skuse
(Culicidae), revealed by reciprocal
distribution models. Global Ecology
and Biogeography 19, 122–133.
Poulíčková, A., Špačková, J., Kelly,
M.G., Duchoslav, M., Mann, D.G .
(2008). Ecological variation within
Sellaphora species complexes
(Bacillariophyceae):€specialists
or generalists? Hydrobiologia 614,
373–386.
Pulliam, H.R. (2002). On the relationship
between niche and distribution.
Ecology Letters 3, 349–361.
Ramette, A., Tiedje, J.M. (2007).
Biogeography: an emerging cornerstone
for understanding prokaryotic diversity,
ecology, and evolution. Microbial
Ecology 53, 197–207.
microbes as a test of biogeogr a phic principles
Reed, K.D., Meece, J.K., Archer, J.R.,
Peterson, A.T. (2008). Ecologic niche
modeling of Blastomyces dermatitidis
in Wisconsin. PLoS ONE 3, 1–7.
Sagarin, R.D., Gaines, S.D. (2002). The
‘abundant centre’ distribution:€to what
extent is it a biogeographical rule?
Ecology Letters 5, 137–147.
Sagarin, R. D, Gaines, S.D., Gaylord, B.
(2006). Moving beyond assumptions to
understand abundance distributions
across the ranges of species. Trends in
Ecology and Evolution 21, 526–530.
Soberón, J., Nakamura, M. (2009). Niches
and distributional areas:€concepts,
methods, and assumptions.
Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences USA 106, 19644–10650.
Thomas, C.D., Kunin, W.E. (1999). The
spatial structure of populations.
Journal of Animal Ecology 68,
647–657.
Weisse, T., Karstens, N., Meyer, V.C.L. et€al.
(2001). Niche separation in common
prostome freshwater ciliates:€the effect
of food and temperature. Aquatic
Microbial Ecology 26, 167–179.
Weithoff, G. (2004). Vertical niche
separation of two consumers
(Rotatoria) in an extreme habitat.
Oecologia 139, 594–603.
Westman, W.E. (1980). Gaussian
analysis:€identifying environmental
factors influencing bell-shaped species
distributions. Ecology 61, 733–739.
Whittaker, R.H. (1956). Vegetation of the
Great Smoky Mountains. Ecological
Monographs 26, 2–80.
Wiley, E.O., McNyset, K.M., Peterson, A.T.,
Robins, C.R., Stewart, A.M. (2003).
Niche modeling and geographic range
predictions in the marine environment
using a machine-learning algorithm.
Oceanography 16, 120–127.
Williams, R. (1988). Spatial heterogeneity
and niche differentiation in oceanic
zooplankton. Hydrobiologia 167–168,
151–159.
323
16
A metacommunity perspective on
the phylo- and biogeography of small
organisms
Luc De Meester
Laboratory of Aquatic Ecology and Evolutionary Biology,
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
16.1╇ Dispersal in small organisms
Small organisms rely on passive dispersal for colonising new habitats. Especially
when they form resistant stages, passive dispersal does not translate into weak
or limited dispersal (Bilton et al., 2001; Havel and Shurin, 2004). The main cost
of passive dispersal is that the organism has no control over the trajectory and
destination. By having adaptations for specific vectors (e.g. animals instead of
wind), directionality and destination can to a certain extent be influenced. In
aquatic organisms and plants, there is increasing evidence of widespread and
potentially long-distance dispersal by a multitude of vectors, ranging from wind
(Vanschoenwinkel et al., 2008a) and birds (Green et al., 2002; Figuerola et al., 2005)
to insects (Van de Meutter et al., 2008), mammals (Vanschoenwinkel et al., 2008b)
and humans and their transportation means (Havel et al., 2002). This translates
into relatively high dispersal rates, as is shown by rapid colonisation rates of new
habitats and rapid spread of exotic species (e.g. Louette and De Meester, 2005;
Biogeography of Microscopic Organisms: Is Everything Small Everywhere?, ed. Diego Fontaneto.
Published by Cambridge University Press. © The Systematics Association 2011.
m e ta c o m m u n i t y p e r s p e c t i v e o n p h y l o - a n d b i o g e o g r a p h y o f s m a l l o r g a n i s m s
Havel and Shurin, 2004). Specific characteristics may make some species better
dispersers than others, and dispersal rates in practice will also largely depend on
abundance (i.e. sources of individuals). Effective dispersal, i.e. dispersal followed
by establishment success, will in addition depend on the occurrence of habitats
and their suitability for the focal species, and thus also on ecological specialisation and habitat preference of these species. In addition, potentially suitable habitats may become practically unsuitable because of the presence of other species,
implying that effective dispersal may also depend on the dispersal rates and ecological specialisation of other species. The discrepancy between dispersal rates
quantified as movement of organisms from habitat to habitat and effective dispersal rates, i.e. the establishment of new populations in target habitats following
immigration, can be very large. This makes quantifying dispersal rates very difficult:€quantifying moving individuals or estimating their number by extrapolation
through modelling is a very difficult and time-consuming activity, yet does not
suffice to obtain a reliable estimate of effective dispersal between communities
or populations. Although it does provide valuable data on colonisation potential
of organisms, it should not be carelessly translated into patterns of gene flow. The
reverse is also true, as gene flow estimated from population genetic analyses using
neutral markers should not be used as a substitute of dispersal rates. In many
organisms including human populations (Ramachandran et al., 2005), population genetic structure and phylogeographic patterns reflect colonisation dynamics rather than ongoing gene flow, and show a pattern of serial colonisation.
16.2╇ Metacommunity structure of small organisms
Metacommunities are defined as collections of local communities that interact
through the exchange of individuals, while local dynamics still dominate over
regional impact. Leibold et al. (2004) introduced four paradigms (species sorting,
mass effects, patch dynamics and the neutral model) as guidelines to grasp the
relative importance of processes that structure natural metacommunities. In the
species sorting paradigm, patches differ ecologically and dispersal is high enough
so that the right species reaches the right patches. However, dispersal is not so
high to result in homogenisation of species composition across ecologically different patches. Mass effects occur when dispersal is so high that it results in sourcesink dynamics across patches, so that the match between species composition
and local environmental conditions is reduced as species are found in habitats in
which they would normally not occur. In the patch dynamics and neutral model
paradigms, dispersal limitation is more important. The patch dynamics paradigm
implies a trade-off between dispersal capacity and competitive strength among
species, while species are ecologically equivalent in the neutral model.
325
326
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
If small organisms show relatively high dispersal rates, overall metacommunity structure in these organisms is expected to be dominated by species sorting
and mass effects rather than by dispersal limitation and patch dynamics. I here
refer to the overall metacommunity structure, because one has to consider that
the likelihood of dispersal limitation will become higher for rare species in the
metacommunity, as rareness translates in fewer sources of individuals and thus
overall lower dispersal. Most data sets on small organisms so far tend to conform
to the above expectation:€ in most cases metacommunities of small organisms
(microbial organisms, protists, small metazoans like zooplankton) conform to
the species sorting paradigm (Cottenie et al., 2003; Leibold et al., 2004; Cottenie,
2005; Van der Gucht et al., 2007; Vanormelingen et al., 2008), although some studies report an impact of dispersal limitation (Whitaker et al., 2003) or mass effects
(Lindström et al., 2006). In metacommunity analysis, spatial scale and landscape connectivity are important. In studies in which several organism groups
are compared for their metacommunity structure in the same set of habitats, an
overall increase in the importance of species sorting as a force structuring local
metacommunities is expected with decreasing size of the organism. This is illustrated by the study of Beisner et al. (2006) on metacommunity structure of fish,
zooplankton, phytoplankton and bacteria in 18 Canadian lakes. Similarly, in a
number of parallel studies on the same set of interconnected ponds at ‘De Maten’
in Belgium, there is an increase in the degree to which environmental gradients
(i.e. species sorting) determine species composition of local communities as one
moves from macro-invertebrates (Van de Meutter et al., 2007) through zooplankton (Cottenie et al., 2003) to phyto- and bacterioplankton (Van der Gucht et al.,
2007; Vanormelingen et al., 2008). The reason why few cases of mass effects have
been reported is probably related to the high population growth rates of many
small organisms, which increases the impact of local as compared with regional
dynamics (Van der Gucht et al., 2007). In organisms that have resistant dormant stages or can remain viable in an inactive state (like many prokaryotes),
the impact of species sorting is enhanced because dispersal can act in a cumulative way thus reducing dispersal limitation (Fenchel, 2003). Dormant stages may
reach an unsuitable habitat and reside there, remaining sensitive to emerge when
environmental conditions would change so that the habitat becomes suitable. In
this way, dispersal must not continuously be high to overcome dispersal limitation, as a low dispersal rate combined with a capacity to remain viable during
unfavourable conditions during a reasonably long time may lead to the capacity
of local communities to effectively respond to environmental gradients by species and lineage sorting.
In summary, the general pattern is that species (lineage) sorting becomes more
important as organisms become smaller, which increases their capacity for passive
long-distance dispersal and is associated with higher population growth rates. It
m e ta c o m m u n i t y p e r s p e c t i v e o n p h y l o - a n d b i o g e o g r a p h y o f s m a l l o r g a n i s m s
remains that in habitat specialists favouring rare habitats and/or rare species, dispersal limitation may still occur and result in a decrease of the matching of species
(lineage) composition to environmental gradients and an associated increase of
the spatial signal in a metacommunity analysis.
16.3╇ Extending the spatial scale:€phylo- and
biogeography of small organisms
Where does metacommunity ecology stop and biogeography begin? As one
increases spatial scales, interactions among communities through exchange of
individuals becomes weaker. In principle, a set of communities that are so distant from each other that an exchange of individuals is extremely rare could still
be viewed as an example of a metacommunity at the low dispersal end of the
continuum. One can thus view metacommunity dynamics as one of the major
structuring forces of biogeographic patterns. Entirely in parallel, at the population level, metapopulation dynamics can be viewed as one of the major structuring forces of phylogeographic patterns (Roderick, 1996; Avise, 2000; Hanski
and Gaggiotti, 2004). Which large-scale patterns does one expect for small
organisms? Does one expect similar patterns to the typical biogeography seen
for macroorganisms, reflecting geographic dispersal barriers (e.g. at the continental scale) and past geological events? The observation that dispersal rates in
space and time (through dormant stages) can be high would lead one to suggest
that the biogeographic patterns observed for macroorganisms are unlikely to
be common for microorganisms. There is a vivid debate on the degree to which
microorganisms have cosmopolitan distributions (e.g. Fenchel, 2003; Martiny
et€al., 2006; Green et€al., 2008). There are numerous reports suggesting that the
biogeographic patterns observed for macroorganisms are absent among microorganisms (Fierer and Jackson, 2006; Van der Gucht et al., 2007). Also, haplotypes
for specific genes (e.g. 16SrRNA gene) are often shared by individuals inhabiting
different latitudes and even continents (Zwart et al., 2003). These data imply that
a substantial number of microorganisms may have much broader distributions
than most macroorganisms (Finlay, 2002; Katz et al., 2005). Yet, there are also
studies showing biogeographic signals in microorganisms that seem reminiscent of those observed for macroorganisms (Whitaker et al., 2003). Indeed, many
studies have reported striking provincialism in the phylogeography of small
organisms such as zooplankton and protists (e.g. Hebert and Wilson, 1994).
The controversy is strongly enhanced by the problematic nature of identifying
prokaryotes and protists to species level (Heger et al., 2009). A major argument
of authors claiming against cosmopolitanism in protists and prokaryotes is that
taxonomic resolution is too low or unreliable, so that what is being claimed to
327
328
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
be a cosmopolitan species is actually a conglomerate of related species or a
species complex. There are clear cases in which formerly cosmopolitan species
were recognised to belong to different taxa, meaning that what are currently
considered to be cosmopolitan species may instead be cosmopolitan genera
(zooplankton:€ Frey, 1982). Yet, even if one considers those lineage clusters as
genera rather than species, the emerging pattern seems that cosmopolitanism
at genus level in prokaryotes and protists is much higher than that observed for
macroorganisms.
16.4╇ Towards a reconciliation of these conflicting
patterns and expectations?
There are a number of processes that interfere with the extrapolation of potentially high dispersal rates to widespread distributions and an absence of spatial
signal. In the following, I argue that these modifying processes result in predictions that may match with observed phylo- and biogeographic patterns in
microorganisms.
The first process to interfere with global distributions of organisms is habitat
specialisation and rareness, two features that are often associated with each other.
If organisms are specialised to rare habitat conditions such as hot water springs
(e.g. Whitaker et al., 2003), it is more likely that dispersal limitation will impact
their distribution. As organisms become more rare or adapted to more rare habitats, populations and communities tend to become more isolated. The more habitats are isolated islands in an unfavourable matrix, the more dispersal limitation
may become important.
The second process that interferes with global distributions of microorganisms is priority effects and monopolisation (sensu De Meester et al., 2002;
Urban and De Meester, 2009). Microorganisms are not only characterised by
high dispersal rates, but also by high population growth rates, short generation
times and, often, the capacity to produce dormant stage banks. Rapid population growth combined with the formation of dormant stage banks may result in
strong numerical advantage of first colonisers, as they rapidly reach carrying
capacity in the newly colonised habitat. Once a habitat has been successfully
colonised, the bank of dormant individuals effectively prevents population sizes
from reaching very low numbers. For microorganisms, soon after colonisation
of even a small habitat it may very soon be inhabited by millions to billions
of individuals, providing the resident population with a powerful advantage
over secondary immigrants (De Meester et al., 2002). If rapid local adaptation,
fostered by short generation times, also increases the match between the fitness profile of the resident population and local habitat conditions, then the
m e ta c o m m u n i t y p e r s p e c t i v e o n p h y l o - a n d b i o g e o g r a p h y o f s m a l l o r g a n i s m s
priority effect may be strongly enhanced and may become permanent (Urban
and De€ Meester, 2009). This process, by which local adaptation may result in
first colonisers monopolising the habitat to such an extent that the subsequent
immigrants fail to successfully establish, will only be effective for species that
occupy a similar niche and therefore may compete with each other. This process is thus most likely to influence intraspecific phylogeographic patterns, and
patterns of occurrence of ecologically similar species, which may or may not be
phylogenetically strongly related.
If the above processes are important in microorganisms, what phylo- and biogeographic patterns would one expect to see? The predictions are broad, ranging
from cosmopolitanism to extreme provincialism. First, for some very common
species, dispersal rates may be high enough at a global scale such that they are
truly cosmopolitan. For more rare species or species that are highly specialised,
a more typical biogeographic pattern reminiscent of most macroorganisms may
appear because of dispersal limitation. In cosmopolitan species too, however,
one may expect structure at the phylogeographic level, reflecting monopolisation events. First, serial colonisation is likely, yielding a pattern of isolation by
distance not driven by a gradual reduction in gene flow but because of historical colonisation events. Serial colonisation receives increasing attention, also
in macroorganisms including humans (Ramachandran et al., 2005). In microorganisms more than in macroorganisms, however, one may also expect a more
complicated mosaic pattern of haplotype distribution, and sometimes ‘enclaves’
in which specific haplotypes dominate in a certain region that is surrounded by
other haplotypes. These mosaic and enclave patterns result because of a combination of long-distance dispersal and monopolisation. In most cases, new
habitats will be colonised by lineages from nearby habitats, resulting in continuous distribution patterns. But in organisms that engage in long-distance
dispersal and show a high capacity of monopolisation (rapid population growth
combined with rapid local adaptation), from time to time new habitats may get
colonised through long-distance dispersal, and, if these early arrivers grow with
sufficient rapidity to enforce a priority effect over secondary immigrants from
nearby habitats, this may result in discontinuous distribution patterns of haplo�
types (Fig 16.1).
I predict that phylogeographic patterns like mosaic and enclave distributions
are much more common in microorganisms than in macroorganisms, because
of their different capacity for monopolisation (cf. capacity for high population
growth rates and rapid local adaptation; De Meester et al., 2002). Long-distance
dispersal may be quite common in many microorganisms, e.g. when dispersal is mediated by migrating birds. In a phylogeographic study of the water flea
Daphnia magna, De Gelas and De Meester (2005) revealed such discontinuous distribution of a number of haplotypes (e.g. Scandinavia and Israel). Mills
329
330
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Fig 16.1 Hypothetical distributions of species (biogeography) or haplotypes
(phylogeography) in a landscape. Different hatching patterns refer to different species or
genetic lineages. The thick line in A–C depicts a geographic barrier; there is no geographic
barrier in panel D. I assume no environmental gradients, so that the distributions of
species and genetic lineages are independent of habitat preferences. (A) Ubiquitous
species that colonised the whole area (‘cosmopolitan’ if this pattern occurs at a global
scale). (B) Distribution that matches a geographic barrier, here also combined with an
‘enclave’ distribution. This pattern results from priority effects, partly modulated by a
geographic barrier, and partly by a chance colonisation event (enclave distribution).
(C) A more complex pattern partly mediated by a geographic barrier, partly by priority
effects not associated with a geographic barrier. (D) A complex ‘mosaic’ pattern that is
independent from true geographic barriers.
et al. (2007) also interpret isolation by distance in the globally distributed rotifer Brachionus plicatilis as reflecting persistent founder events. In essence,
the mono�polisation process, i.e. founder events being reinforced by local genetic adaptation, is quite similar to insular settings and isolated habitats that
get colonised and undergo independent specialisation, leading to incipient or
true speciation (Schluter, 2000; Hendry et al., 2002; Gillespie, 2004). I expect
m e ta c o m m u n i t y p e r s p e c t i v e o n p h y l o - a n d b i o g e o g r a p h y o f s m a l l o r g a n i s m s
monopolisation to occur more frequently in micro- than in macroorganisms,
because of their capacity for rapid local adaptation. Intriguingly, the elevated
capacity of microorganisms to become locally adapted leads to a prediction that
they should often show provincialism, thus running in the counter-direction to
the prediction that they should be widespread due to their dispersal abilities.
Here, spatio-temporal dynamics may be important, one prediction being that
taxa may initially appear widespread but become increasingly provincial during
the course of time, because of adaptation to local conditions. Although this process is expected to be more apparent across greater spatial scales, the relationship
with space is difficult to predict, as monopolisation may already reduce effective
gene flow at small spatial scales. The key message here is that more studies are
needed, and that the contrast between high potential for long-distance dispersal
combined with a strong capacity for monopolisation (evolution-driven priority
effects) provides an interesting framework for interpreting phylogeographic patterns in small organisms.
The above suggests that there should be differences between the typical biogeographic signal in macroorganisms as compared with microorganisms. I expect
many more mosaic distributions and disjunct distributions in microorganisms
because of their capacity for long-distance dispersal combined with rapid population development fuelled by asexual reproduction during the parthenogenetic/
asexual phase of their reproduction cycle. The biogeographic signal is thus ‘disturbed’ by unexpected occurrence of haplotypes or species that have locally colonÂ�
ised and occupied habitat. To the extent that species strongly overlap in niches
and€are ecologically similar, the same mosaic patterns may also be found at the
community level, in which, depending on the region, one or the other of ecologically similar species dominates. Although there may often be a clear spatial signal,
it may not be a straightforward increase in genetic differentiation with increasing
geographic distance.
16.5╇ Summary
If the above ideas bear out, biogeographic patterns among macro- and microorganisms would be caused by quite different mechanisms:€ more dispersal limitation driven in macroorganisms, while more monopolisation driven
in microorganisms. Isolation by distance in our view is often not driven by
ongoing dispersal and gene flow, but may rather reflect historical colonisation
events. And especially in microorganisms, occasional long-distance dispersal
may disturb this isolation by distance and generate mosaic and enclave distributions, both at the among (biogeography) and within species (phylogeog�
raphy) level.
331
332
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
References
Avise, J.C. (2000). Phylogeography:€The
History and Formation of Species.
Cambridge, MA:€Harvard University
Press.
Beisner, B.E., Peres Neto, P.R., Lindström,
E.S., Barnett A., Longhi, M.L. (2006).
The role of environmental and
spatial processes in structuring lake
communities from bacteria to fish.
Ecology 87, 2985–2991.
Bilton, D.T., Freeland, J.R., Okamura,€B.
(2001). Dispersal in freshwater
invertebrates. Annual Reviews of
Ecology and Systematics 32, 159–181.
Cottenie, K. (2005). Integrating
environmental and spatial processes
in ecological community dynamics.
Ecology Letters 8, 1175–1182.
Cottenie, K., Michels, E., Nuytten N.,
De Meester, L. (2003). Zooplankton
metacommunity structure:€regional
versus local processes in highly
interconnected ponds. Ecology 84,
991–1000.
De Gelas, K., De Meester, L. (2005).
Phylogeography of Daphnia magna in
Europe. Molecular Ecology 14, 754–763.
De Meester, L., Gómez, Q., Okamura,€B.,
Schwenk, K. (2002). The
Monopolization Hypothesis and
the dispersal-gene flow paradox in
aquatic organisms. Acta Oecologica 23,
121–135.
Fenchel, T. (2003). Biogeography for
bacteria. Science 301, 925–926.
Fierer, N., Jackson, R.B. (2006). The
diversity and biogeography of soil
bacterial communities. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences USA
103, 626–631.
Figuerola, J., Green A.J., Michot, T.C.
(2005). Invertebrate eggs can
fly:€evidence of waterfowl-mediated
gene flow in aquatic invertebrates.
American Naturalist 165, 274–280.
Finlay, B.J. (2002). Global dispersal of freeliving microbial eukaryote species.
Science 296, 1061–1063.
Frey, D.G. (1982). Questions concerning
cosmopolitanism in Cladocera. Archiv
für Hydrobiologie 93, 484–502.
Gillespie, R. (2004). Community
assembly through adaptive radiation
in Hawaiian spiders. Science 303,
356–359.
Green, A.J., Figuerola, J., Sanchez, M.T.
(2002). Implications of waterbird
ecology for the dispersal of aquatic
organisms. Acta Oecologica 23,
177–189.
Green, J.L., Bohannan, B.J.M.,
Whitaker, R.J. (2008). Microbial
biogeography:€from taxonomy to traits.
Science 320, 1039–1043.
Hanski, I., Gaggiotti, O.E. (2004).
Ecology, Genetics, and
Evolution of Metapopulations.
Amsterdam:€Elsevier.
Havel, J.E., Shurin, J.B. (2004).
Mechanisms, effects, and scale of
dispersal in zooplankton. Limnology
and Oceanography 49, 1229–1238.
Havel, J.E., Shurin, J.B., Jones, J.R. (2002).
Estimating dispersal from patterns of
spread:€spatial and local control of lake
invasions. Ecology 83, 3306–3318.
Hebert, P.D.N., Wilson, C.C. (1994).
Provincialism in plankton:€endemism
and allopatric speciation in Australian
Daphnia. Evolution 48, 1333–1349.
Heger, T.J., Mitchell, E.A.D., Ledeganck,€P.
et al. (2009). The curse of taxonomic
uncertainty in biogeographical
studies of free-living terrestrial
m e ta c o m m u n i t y p e r s p e c t i v e o n p h y l o - a n d b i o g e o g r a p h y o f s m a l l o r g a n i s m s
protists:€a case study of testate
amoebae from Amsterdam Island.
Journal of Biogeography 36, 1551–1560.
Hendry, A.P., Taylor, E.B., McPhail, J.D .
(2002). Adaptive divergence and the
balance between selection and gene
flow:€lake and stream stickleback
in the Misty system. Evolution 56,
1199–1216.
Katz, L.A., McManus, G.B., SnoeyenbosWest, O.L.O. et al. (2005). Reframing
the ‘Everything is everywhere’
debate:€evidence for high gene flow
and diversity in ciliate morphospecies.
Aquatic Microbial Ecology 41, 55–65.
Leibold, M.A., Holyoak, M., Mouquet,€N.
et al. (2004). The metacommunity
concept:€a framework for multiplescale community ecology. Ecology
Letters 7, 601–613.
Lindström, E.S., Forlsund, M., Algesten,
G., Bergström, A.-K . (2006). External
control of bacterial community
structure in lakes. Limnology and
Oceanography 51, 339–342.
Logue, J.B., Lindström, E.S . (2008).
Biogeography of bacterioplankton in
inland waters. Freshwater Reviews 1,
99–114.
Louette, G., De Meester, L. (2005).
High dispersal capacity in aquatic
organisms:€species richness in
cladoceran communities colonizing
newly created habitats. Ecology 86,
353–359.
Martiny, J.B.H., Bohannan, B.J.M.,
Brown, J.H. et al. (2006). Microbial
biogeography: putting microorganisms on the map. Nature Reviews
Microbiology 4, 102–112.
Mills, S., Lunt, D.H., Gomez, A. (2007).
Global isolation by distance despite
strong regional phylogeography in a
small metazoan. BMC Evolutionary
Biology 7, 225.
Ramachandran, S., Deshpande, O.,
Roseman, C. et al. (2005). Support
from the relationship of genetic
and geographic distance in human
populations for a serial founder effect
originating in Africa. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences USA 102,
15942–15947.
Roderick, G.K. (1996). Geographic
structure of insect populations:€gene
flow, phylogeography, and their uses.
Annual Review on Entomology 41,
325–352.
Schluter, D. (2000). The Ecology of Adaptive
Radiation. Oxford:€Oxford University
Press.
Urban, M., De Meester, L. (2009).
Community monopolization:
local€adaptation enhances
priority effects in an evolving
metacommunity. Proceedings of
the Royal Society of London B 276,
4129–4138.
Van De Meutter, F., De Meester, L., Stoks,€R.
(2007). Metacommunity structure of
pond macro invertebrates:€effects of
dispersal mode and generation time.
Ecology 88, 1687–1695.
Van de Meutter, F., Stoks, R., De
Meester, L. (2008). Size-selective
dispersal of Daphnia resting eggs by
backswimmers (Notonecta maculata).
Biology Letters 4, 494–496.
Van der Gucht, K., Cottenie, K., Muylaert,
K. et al. (2007). The power of species
sorting:€local factors drive bacterial
community composition over a wide
range of spatial scale. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences USA
104, 20404–20409.
Vanormelingen, P., Cottenie, K., Michels,
E. et al. (2008). The relative importance
of dispersal and local processes
in structuring phytoplankton
communities in a set of highly
333
334
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
interconnected ponds. Freshwater
Biology 53, 2170–2183.
Vanschoenwinkel, B., Gielen, S., Seaman,
M., Brendonck, L. (2008a). Any way the
wind blows€– frequent wind dispersal
drives species sorting in ephemeral
aquatic communities. Oikos 117,
125–134.
Vanschoenwinkel, B., Waterkeyn, A.,
Vandecaetsbeek, T. et al. (2008b).
Dispersal of freshwater invertebrates
by large terrestrial mammals:€a case
study with wild boar (Sus scrofa) in
Mediterranean wetlands. Freshwater
Biology 53, 2264–2273.
Whitaker, R.J., Grogan, D.W., Taylor,
J.W. (2003). Geographic barriers
isolate endemic populations of
hyperthermophilic archaea. Science
301, 976–978.
Zwart, G., van Hannen, E.J., Kamst-van
Agterveld, M.P. et al. (2003). Rapid
screening for freshwater bacterial groups
by using reverse line blot hybridization.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
69, 5875–5883.
17
Geographic variation in the diversity
of microbial communities:€research
directions and prospects for
experimental biogeography
Joaquín Hortal
Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias
Naturales (CSIC), Madrid, Spain; and Azorean Biodiversity Group – CITA A,
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Azores, Angra do Heroísmo,
Terceira, Açores, Portugal
17.1╇ Introduction
Traditionally, most ecologists understand the world from a human scale.
Ecosystems are often understood as large visible units of the landscape,1 usually homogeneous land patches or a series of adjacent patches with intense flows
of individuals, energy or biomass and nutrients. However, there is more in a
landscape than meets the eye. An arguably homogeneous land patch within a
╇ Commonly ‘all the visible features of an area of land’ (Compact Oxford English Dictionary,
revised edition 2008; my italics). In ecology, a series of spatial units occupied by an
heterogeneous species assemblage (e.g. Polis et al., 2003).
1
Biogeography of Microscopic Organisms: Is Everything Small Everywhere?, ed. Diego Fontaneto.
Published by Cambridge University Press. © The Systematics Association 2011.
336
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
landscape hosts many small ecosystems, or microhabitat patches, where many
different communities of microbes2 dwell and interact. For example, imagine you
are standing in a clearing of an open forest in a temperate region. A terrestrial
ecologist studying macroscopic organisms would think he is looking at part of a
single ecosystem. On the contrary, a microbial ecologist will identify a plethora
of different ecosystems, including leaf litter of different degrees of humidity, the
bark of each different tree and shrub species, treeholes, temporary puddles and
pools, moss cushions of different life forms growing over different substrates,
etc. Not to mention soil communities. In other words, a 1â•›ha clearing within a
forest could be considered a whole landscape for many groups of microbes.
A key question in microbial ecology is thus whether the patterns and organisation
of microbial communities differ from those of macroscopic organisms just in terms
of scale or they are so radically different that the rules affecting macrobes cannot be
extrapolated to microbes. The debate on this question extends to the biogeography
of microorganisms. Strikingly, it has been argued that most microorganisms do
not have biogeography; that is, that contrary to macroorganisms, the distributions
of microorganism species are just limited by local environmental conditions (e.g.
Fenchel and Finlay, 2003, 2004 and below). But, are microbes so different from their
larger relatives than they follow different ecological and biogeographic rules?
Here I will argue that when it comes to the spatial distribution (and basic ecology) of their communities, many microbes (especially multicellular ones) are just
smaller than large organisms, rather than radically different in their ecological
organisation and biogeographic responses. More precisely, I will first argue that
not everything small is everywhere, and then provide a brief account of current
evidence on the spatial distribution of microbe diversity at the community level.
Given the purpose of this chapter, this review will be argumentative rather than
exhaustive. Based on such review, I will propose the study of microbes as a way of
advancing current biogeographic and macroecological theory,3 under the hypothesis that some biogeographic principles can be evaluated with success on microorganisms, controlling for many of the confounding factors acting at large scales,
or even allowing to develop experiments in biogeography.
╇ By microbes I refer to all microscopic and small-sized organisms. I will use this term (and
eventually microorganisms for style reasons) throughout. Microbes are often defined as
organisms less than 1–2â•›mm in size (in opposition to macrobes, i.e. those larger than 2â•›mm; see
Finlay, 2002), but here I will use a relaxed definition of microorganisms, and follow the common
use of including also bryophytes, ferns and fungi, whose spores are smaller than 2â•›mm.
3
╇ Note that I refer to patterns at the community level (i.e. species richness, species
replacement or functional diversity); complementarily, Jenkins and colleagues (Chapter
15) propose using microbes to study a series of biogeographical principles at the species
level, namely the relationships between species distributions and abundance, body size
and niche characteristics, and the phylogenetic structure of species across space.
2
g e o g r a p h i c v a r i at i o n i n t h e d i v e r s i t y o f m i c r o b i a l c o m m u n i t i e s
17.2╇ Spatial variations in the diversity of microscopic
organisms
17.2.1╇ Is everything small everywhere?
Perhaps the most striking difference between the known spatial distributions of
macrobe and microbe species is that while restricted distributions are the rule for
the former, it has been argued that they may be exceptions for the latter (Fenchel
and Finlay, 2003, 2004; Kellogg and Griffin, 2006 Fontaneto and Hortal, 2008).
However, the level of knowledge about the spatial distribution of microbial diversity is not comparable to that of macroscopic organisms. Despite the causes of the
spatial distribution of diversity still being under debate (see section 17.4 below),
the current degree of knowledge on macrobes is rather good. Although most of
the groups with well-known diversity patterns at the global scale are vertebrates
(Grenyer et al., 2006; Schipper et al., 2008), the variations in the numbers of species of plants (Kreft and Jetz, 2007) or insects (Dunn et al., 2009) throughout the
globe are also starting to be well-known, and at least partly understood (Lomolino
et al., 2006). In contrast, the level of knowledge on the spatial distribution of most
(if€ not all) groups of microorganisms is quite limited (Foissner, 2008; Fontaneto
and Hortal, 2008). Whether such deficit in knowledge is the cause of the apparent
lack of biogeography of most microorganisms or not is perhaps the hottest debate
in current microbial ecology.
The realisation that, apparently, many microbial species are found in quite distant localities led to the proposition of the ‘Everything is everywhere’ (EiE) hypothesis at the beginning of the twentieth century (Beijerinck, 1913; Baas Becking,
1934). This hypothesis is further supported by the high dispersal potential (sensu
Weisse, 2008) of most microbes (Finlay, 2002). Their small size, large population
numbers and, especially, the ability to either enter dormant states or produce
small spores allow many microorganisms to produce vast numbers of propagules
that are easily dispersed in a passive way (i.e. ‘ubiquitous dispersal’:€Fenchel, 1993;
Finlay et al., 1996a, 2006; Cáceres, 1997; Wilkinson, 2001; Fenchel and Finlay, 2004).
Arguably, this would permit many microbes to maintain cosmopolitan distributions. Although the EiE hypothesis has been the dominant paradigm for microbial biogeography until relatively recently (O’Malley, 2007, 2008), it has been hotly
debated during the last decade, dividing microbial ecologists into two factions
(Whitfield, 2005). Some argue that the rule for microorganisms is ‘Everything is
everywhere, but the environment selects’ (Finlay, 2002; de Wit and Bouvier, 2006;
Fenchel and Finlay, 2006). Others counter that many apparently cosmopolitan
ranges are actually artifacts of the deficient taxonomy of microbes, which does not
permit distinguishing between morphologically similar but spatially and genetically isolated lineages (Coleman, 2002; Foissner, 2006, 2008; Taylor et al., 2006).
337
338
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
In my opinion there is now enough information to develop a theoretical (and
analytical) framework that will resolve the EiE debate and lay the foundations for
a general theory of microbial biogeography. However, this is beyond the intended
scope of the chapter; more information can be found in several chapters of this
book, or by consulting the references above (see also Martiny et al., 2006; Green
and Bohannan, 2006; Telford et al., 2006; Green et al., 2008). Having said this, any
study on the spatial distribution of microorganism communities shall necessarily
address the question of whether everything small is everywhere. Should microbes
be locally abundant and extremely widespread, their local diversity would be the
result of random colonisation processes, as argued by, for example, Finlay et al.
(1999, 2001). Here, differences among communities would be determined only by
local environmental conditions. However, such cosmopolitanism seems to be far
from universal. Many microbe species have been found to have restricted distributions (Mann and Droop, 1996; Smith and Wilkinson, 2007; Frahm, 2008; Segers
and De Smet, 2008; Vanormelingen et al., 2008; Spribille et al., 2009). Hence, the
dependence of range size on body size hypothesised by Finlay and colleagues (e.g.
Finlay et al., 1996b; Finlay, 2002; Finlay and Fenchel, 2004) is not as general as they
argue (Valdecasas et al., 2006; Pawlowski and Holzman, 2008; but see Martiny
et€al., 2006). More importantly, the EiE hypothesis is challenged in its assumption
that the large dispersal potential of microbes necessarily results in high rates of
effective dispersal (i.e. successful dispersal events, see Weisse, 2008). Rather, the
propagules of many (but not all) microorganisms are not ‘universally successful’ in maintaining significant levels of gene flow between geographically remote
populations (Jenkins, 1995; Jenkins and Underwood, 1998; Bohonak and Jenkins,
2003; Foissner, 2006, 2008; Jenkins et al., 2007; Weisse, 2008; Frahm, 2008).
As a direct consequence of the total or partial isolation of populations in relation
to distance, phylogeographic variations (i.e. geographically structured genetic
differences) have been found for many microbial taxa. Increasing spatial distance
between populations results in genetic divergence and isolation even for prokaryotes (Whitaker et al., 2003; Prosser et al., 2007; Vos and Velicer, 2008). This may
emerge as the common rule for many protists and multicellular microbes, once
traditional approaches to their taxonomy are complemented with more detailed
molecular studies (Foissner, 2008; Pawlowski and Holzman, 2008; Weisse, 2008).
In fact, many recent studies finding significant hidden genetic divergence within
morphologically based microbial species find also that these genetically different
populations or species occupy geographically distant areas (Gómez et al., 2007;
Mills et al., 2007; Fontaneto et al., 2008a; Weisse, 2008; Xu et al., 2009). Therefore,
it could be expected that as knowledge of the phylogeny of microorganisms and
their taxonomy improves, the number of microbes with restricted distributions
will increase as well. The actual proportion of microbe species with reduced range
sizes remains as a mystery, although some estimates indicate that at least one
g e o g r a p h i c v a r i at i o n i n t h e d i v e r s i t y o f m i c r o b i a l c o m m u n i t i e s
third of protist species will show restricted distributions (according to the moderate endemicity model; see Foissner, 2006, 2008). Nevertheless, such hidden
microbial diversity will have an impact on the patterns of diversity observed at the
community level.
17.2.2╇ Spatial variations in microbe communities
If the distributions of microorganisms are not cosmopolitan, microbe communities in similar substrates situated in geographically distant areas ought to show
significant differences in their diversity and species composition. The spatial
replacement of species in macrobial communities is typically the result of both
environmental differences and geographic distance, no matter whether they are
lake fishes (Genner et al., 2004), mammals (Hortal et al., 2005), birds or land snails
(Steinitz et al., 2006). Microbes are to some extent similar to macrobes in this particular aspect. Although environmental heterogeneity is the main driver of the
decay of compositional similarity with distance in microorganisms (see Green
and Bohannan, 2006; Martiny et al., 2006), it is not the only source of spatial variation. Using an array of studies on lake diatoms encompassing several continents,
Verleyen et al. (2009) found that, although environment accounts for the larger
part of the spatial replacement of species, connectivity4 also explains a large proportion of the compositional similarities between lakes:€all else being equal, the
closer the lakes, the more similar their species composition. Similar patterns
were found in the phytoplankton communities of the Swedish lakes studied by
Jankowski and Weyhenmeyer (2006). Interestingly, the strength of such replacement may vary according to the kind of habitat for both microbes and macrobes.
Macrobial communities often show different patterns of distance decay of similarity5 in different kinds of habitats (e.g. palm trees, Bjorholm et al., 2008; birds and
land snails, Steinitz et al., 2006). Similarly, the degree of compositional similarity
of the communities of bdelloid rotifers in a valley of northern Italy varies from one
ecological system to another:€whereas stream communities were relatively similar to one another throughout the valley, the species integrating the communities
from terrestrial habitats and lakes were highly variable (Fontaneto et al., 2006).
╇ Connectivity measures distance as perceived by the studied organisms; that is, how
difficult it would be to move between two sites or colonise a given one taking into account
the existence of barriers or facilitations to dispersal (e.g. mountains or wind currents in
the direction of the dispersal, respectively). Therefore, it can be considered a biologically
meaningful analogue to distance.
5
╇ The similarity between several ecological and evolutionary phenomena often decreases
or decays as the distance between them increases; the distance decay relationship is thus
defined as the negative relationship between distance and the similarity of biological
communities (see Nekola & White, 1999; Soininen et al., 2007).
4
339
340
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
In contrast with these qualitative similarities between small- and large-sized
organisms, the magnitude of the distance-driven changes in species composition
across similar habitats may not be comparable. The slope of the taxa–area relationship in contiguous habitats can be used as a raw measure of the accumulation of species or other taxonomic units with area, and hence of compositional
changes in space (Prosser et al,, 2007; Santos et al., 2010; see also Rosenzweig, 1995
and Whittaker and Fernández-Palacios, 2007 for extensive reviews on the species–
area relationship). To date, the slopes recorded for microbes are typically smaller
than those of macrobes; while the former may range from 0.043 to 0.114 in natural systems (in a power model; Finlay et€ al., 1998; Azovsky, 2002; Green et al.,
2004; Bell et al., 2005; Smith et al., 2005; Green and Bohannan, 2006; Prosser et al.,
2007) the latter are typically larger than 0.15. This indicates that in the absence
of environmental differences, the spatial replacement in the composition of local
communities occurs at much larger scales for microbes, varying in the range of a
few hundreds to thousands of kilometres, instead of the hundreds or even tens of
�kilometres usually found for macrobes.
Strikingly, however, when taxa–area relationships are calculated for habitat
islands (i.e. separate territories/habitat patches instead of contiguous habitats),
the slopes may reach values well over 0.2 for bacteria, which are similar to those
of large-sized organisms (Bell et al., 2005; van der Gast, 2005; see also Green and
Bohannan, 2006; Prosser et al., 2007). This indicates that in spite of their minute
size, habitat area plays a critical role in determining the number of bacterial species that can coexist in a given place, as it does for macroorganisms. In other
words, although microbial communities change with distance at a lower pace
than macrobes, the increase in the number of species with area is similar for both
groups. Further study is required to determine whether this dependence on area
is due to the carrying capacity of the locality (which increases with its area), the
increase of habitat diversity with increasing area, or to passive sampling mech�
anisms (i.e. larger areas receive more propagules and therefore may be colonised
by more species).
The similarities between the macroecological patterns of micro- and macroorganisms do not end with their shared dependence on area. As with their larger
counterparts, the diversity of microbe communities varies along environmental
gradients. One of the most studied is the altitudinal gradient:€species richness varies with altitude, increasing or decreasing for localities closer to or farther from
an optimal altitudinal band (Rahbek, 1995, 2005). These changes in richness are
often accompanied by changes in species composition (e.g. the Alpine dung beetles studied by Jay-Robert et al., 1997). This macroecological pattern has been also
observed in many microorganisms. A good example is the altitudinal variations in
richness shown by rotifers in the Alps (Fontaneto and Ricci, 2006; Fontaneto et al.,
2006; Obertegger et al., 2010). The diversity of tardigrades inhabiting moss and leaf
g e o g r a p h i c v a r i at i o n i n t h e d i v e r s i t y o f m i c r o b i a l c o m m u n i t i e s
litter at the Guadarrama mountain range also shows a typical hump-shaped relationship with elevation (Guil et al., 2009a). As with macrobes, altitudinal variations
in microbe species richness are caused by the varying environmental conditions
at different elevations. Sometimes the decrease in productivity with altitude limits
local diversity, as occurs for phytoplankton richness in a series of Swedish lakes
(Jankowski and Weyhenmeyer, 2006). In other cases, the climatic variations associated with elevational changes cause spatial gradients in local richness, as with
epiphytic bryophyte communities in Guiana (Oliveira et al., 2009) or northwest
Spain (N.G. Medina, B. Albertos, F. Lara, V. Mazimpaka, R. Garilleti, D. Draper and
J. Hortal, unpublished manuscript). Such climate-driven diversity variations in
microbes may arise simply because of habitat sorting (i.e. due to the differences in
niche requirements of each of the species regionally available; see e.g. Whittaker,
1972). In fact, in the two examples given above many species of both bdelloid roti�
fers and tardigrades show strong habitat selection (i.e. habitat sorting; Fontaneto
and Ricci, 2006 and Guil et al., 2009b, respectively). This is consistent with a high
potential for dispersal and local environmental selection (although this process
may involve an important degree of stochasticity; see Fontaneto et al., 2006).
However, geographic changes in the diversity of microbe species inhabiting
similar microhabitats are not only the result of local productivity and/or carrying capacity and environmental variations. The pool of species that can colonise
each microhabitat varies also in space, therefore limiting the number and identity of the colonising species. The regional differences produced by changes in
the species pool are one of the major determinants of the geographic variations
of assemblage diversity for macroorganisms (Ricklefs, 1987, 2004, 2007; Huston,
1999; Hawkins et al., 2003a; Hortal et al., 2008; Hawkins, 2010). Some environments or particular habitats may host fewer species simply because fewer of the
available species have evolved adaptations to these environments, either because
these environments are rare in nature, they are too recent in the region, or they
were affected by important changes in the past, like glaciations. In fact, although
the dispersal distances and the location of refugia may differ, the diversity of several microbial groups has been shaped by post-glacial dispersal (e.g. Gómez et al.,
2007; Smith and Wilkinson, 2007; Smith et al., 2008). More importantly, the composition of the regionally available species pool varies among continents, at least
for lake diatoms (Verleyen et al., 2009). As with macrobes, these differences in the
species pool produce different responses to elevational or climatic gradients, as
shown also for lake diatoms by Telford et al. (2006).
The ultimate consequence of the spatial variations in microbe communities is
the existence of geographic differences in ecosystem functioning. Community
richness, composition, assembly and functional dissimilarity affect ecosystem
productivity and functioning (Laakso and Setälä, 1999; Fukami and Morin, 2003;
Heemsbergen et al., 2004; Sánchez-Moreno et al., 2008). Given that microbes
341
342
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
perform many ecosystem services, geographic variations in community composition are likely to have important functional consequences (Naeslund and
Norberg, 2006; Green et al., 2008). However, the impact of these geographic differences in the functions provided by microbial communities in ecological processes
at regional and global scales is, to date, poorly known.
17.3╇ A frontier of biogeography
An overall insight from the short review above is that the biogeography and macro�
ecology of microbial assemblages present both similarities and differences with
those of macroorganisms. To synthesise, microbes and macrobes both show distance decay in community similarity. It follows that not everything is everywhere.
Hence, although the decay of similarity and the associated compositional changes
are mainly caused by environmental gradients, they are also driven by geographic
variations in the composition of the species pool and the degree of connectivity or
the presence of barriers to dispersal between localities. The geographic variations
in microbe assemblages typically occur at larger distances than for macrobes, and
thus they show a shallower increment of species with increasing area. In spite of
this, the relationships between local richness and area and environmental gradients are comparable to the ones found in macrobes. The differences between
micro- and macroorganisms seem thus limited to their differences in size and dispersal power, which link microbes to smaller microhabitats and make their distributions typically larger.
Some of the challenges awaiting biogeography are right in front of our eyes,
rather than in distant places. Whether the similarities and differences between
the diversity of macrobe and microbe assemblages arise from fundamentally
similar or different processes needs further investigation. Here I outline a research
agenda to help explore this particular frontier of biogeography (see also Martiny
et al., 2006; Green and Bohannan, 2006; Prosser et al., 2007; Green et al., 2008).
To understand the spatial variations in the diversity of microbial assemblages,
research in four main areas is needed:€m icrobial taxonomy; description of biogeographic and macroecological patterns; community ecology and assembly; and the
study of functional diversity and ecosystem functioning.
17.3.1╇ Microbial taxonomy
One key question is to determine the extent to which the patterns observed for
microbes so far are due to their deficient taxonomy, as argued by, for example,
Foissner (2008). Strikingly, in a recent study on moss-dwelling bdelloid rotifers
from the UK and Turkey, the pattern of variations in species richness based on
traditional taxonomy varies when DNA-based taxonomy is applied, not only in
g e o g r a p h i c v a r i at i o n i n t h e d i v e r s i t y o f m i c r o b i a l c o m m u n i t i e s
the numbers of species identified, but also in the relative differences in richness
between localities, and their similarity in composition (Kaya et al., 2009). In fact,
many recent detailed studies reveal large amounts of hidden genetic, physiological
and ecological diversity in microorganism communities (Mann and Droop, 1996;
Weisse, 2008; Guil, 2008; Guil and Giribet, 2009; Fontaneto et al., 2009). Therefore,
the establishment of a solid taxonomy based on the identification of ecological
and evolutionarily meaningful units through DNA and ecophysiological analyses
is a necessary prerequisite to the study of the diversity of microbes. Importantly,
current genetic techniques allow the identification of operational taxonomic units
(OTUs) just from the divergence in a reduced number of DNA sequences with relatively small costs. Thus, a final definition of the species concept (which remains
elusive for some microbial groups) may not be necessary for describing the geographic (and ecological) variations in microorganism diversity.
17.3.2╇ Description of macroecological and biogeographic patterns
Once a good taxonomy is established, it will be possible to describe the patterns
of variation of the diversity of any group of microorganisms. We know relatively
little about how the richness and composition of microbes vary around the world.
In particular, the relationships and compositional similarities between different
regions, islands and continents are typically unknown, as well as whether the latitudinal diversity gradients observed for most groups of macroorganisms hold out
for microbes. In the same way, the relationships between many microorganisms
and the environmental conditions (temperature, nutrients, etc.) are often known
in lab conditions, but how these responses translate to the real world is unknown.
This prevents an accurate determination of the influence of climate change on
the distribution of microbial species, one of the needs identified by Prosser et al.
(2007).
Given current knowledge of the patterns of microbial diversity, three main lines
of research need development within this particular area. Some of this research
must first be conducted at the species (or species-group) level, since a degree of
basic knowledge is necessary before questions can be addressed at the level of the
community or assemblage.
(i) Descriptive biogeography:€t he pure description of geographic patterns of variation at the species level or higher (see e.g. Lomolino et al., 2006). This includes the
identification of biogeographic regions and the inventory of their faunas or floras,
as well as the study of the geographic gradients of diversity. Achieving this particular objective for any microorganism group may need a large amount of fieldwork, but the establishment of standardised survey protocols, the focus on one or
a set of particular microhabitats and the cooperation between experts from different parts of the world may facilitate progress within relatively short periods of
time. A good example of this kind of cooperation is the recent analysis of the global
343
344
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
variations in ant richness performed by Dunn et al. (2009), who were able to compile over 1000 ant assemblages from all over the world coming from standardised
surveys within a few years (N.J. Sanders, personal communication). Such kinds of
data can be used to study the relationships of diversity with climate, to describe
latitudinal gradients, to determine or define biogeographic regions, and for other
purposes (see also the Macroecology section below).
(ii) Phylogeography:€assessing the impact of geographic structure on the evolutionary relationships among populations of a particular taxon (Avise, 2009). This
particular research line is already under development for a few microbial groups
(e.g. Lowe et al., 2005; Gómez et al., 2007; Mills et al., 2007; Mikheyev et al., 2008;
Fontaneto et al., 2008b). However, these efforts are still dispersed:€a goal during
the next few years or decades must be to develop a coordinated long-term research
programme to facilitate a systematic characterisation of the recent evolution and
geographic relationships between microorganism populations in nature. Thus, as
before, some little discussion and coordination effort in this area, including the
identification of specific research goals and certain geographic areas (e.g. islands,
archipelagos or the borders of continents or biogeographic regions) will certainly
enhance current knowledge of the phylogeographic patterns of microorganisms.
Of particular importance is the potential role of humans as dispersal vectors for
free-living and parasitic terrestrial microorganisms. As Wilkinson (2010) recently
stated, the imprint of human-facilitated dispersion on the current biogeography of
many microorganisms may have been underestimated. Determining the impact
of increasing biotic homogenisation at the global scale needs large-scale phylogeographic studies on a number of cosmopolitan microbe species.
(iii) Macroecology. Once the basic biogeographic patterns are described for a
microorganism group, macroecological analyses can determine the impact of climate, productivity and historical effects on its distribution and diversity. Martiny
et al. (2006) review some particular topics that need further research in this area,
and provide an analytical framework to study them. In particular, they advocate
the study of the effects of environment and history, as well as the processes shaping
microbial biogeography, including dispersal and colonisation, diversification and
extinction, or the relationship between body size and distribution range. Apart
from these research topics, the scaling of the relationship between microorganisms and climate needs further study. On the one hand, it is necessary to determine what is the relationship between the responses to environmental factors
observed in laboratory conditions, and the responses to the same factors that are
observed in the field. On the other hand, we need to identify the correct scale to
assess the effects of large-scale environmental gradients (such as climate) on the
diversity of microbial communities inhabiting minute microhabitats. Perhaps surprisingly, climate variables measured with a scale of 1 km2 (i.e. yearly or monthly
precipitation and temperature) are good predictors of the spatial variations in the
g e o g r a p h i c v a r i at i o n i n t h e d i v e r s i t y o f m i c r o b i a l c o m m u n i t i e s
richness of both tardigrades inhabiting 9â•›cm2 moss and leaf litter samples (Guil
et€ al., 2009b) and bryophytes found over oak trunks using quadrats of 400╛cm 2
(N.G. Medina, B.€ Albertos, F. Lara, V. Mazimpaka, R. Garilleti, D. Draper and J.
Hortal, unpublished manuscript). Thus, some particular research on the extent to
which coarse-scale climate and/or microclimatic conditions are affecting microorganism diversity in microhabitats is needed (see also section 17.3.3 below).
All these lines of research, particularly the first two, will benefit considerably
from the cooperation and coordination among the experts of each microbial
group. Thus, specific effort should be devoted to scientific networking, particularly
among the associations of microbiologists or experts in particular groups. An additional goal is to increase the participation of microbiologists in the International
Biogeography Society (IBS; http://www.biogeography.org/):€ a multidisciplinary
association that seeks the advancement of all studies of the geography of nature.
The results of these efforts could be enhanced with help and interest from the
editorial boards of journals in both biogeography and microbial ecology, the
inclusion of chapters on microbial biogeography in the general books on both disciplines, as well as the organisation of specific symposia, such as the one entitled
‘The importance of being small:€does size matter in biogeography?’ organised by
Diego Fontaneto, David Roberts and Juliet Brodie (held within the 7th Systematics
Association Biennial Conference, Leiden, the Netherlands, August 2009), which
led to the compilation of this book.
17.3.3╇ Community ecology and assembly
In parallel with the description and analysis of patterns in nature, the ecology of
microbial communities needs further research. Two aspects deserve particular
attention:€disentangling what determines the number of species that a given system can host; and assessing whether the presence of some species (or any other
taxa) prevents or facilitates the entrance of other species in the local assemblage.
Apart from climate and habitat gradients, the richness of local communities is
typically related with their area (MacArthur and Wilson, 1963, 1967; Rosenzweig,
1995), habitat diversity (Triantis et al., 2003; Hortal et al., 2009) and productivity
(Wright, 1983; Srivastava and Lawton, 1998). As discussed above (section 17.2.2),
the richness of microbial communities is related to their area. However, the origin
of such dependence on area requires further study, and the same occurs with the
relationship with productivity. Here, experiments under laboratory and, especially,
natural conditions may help to clarify the relative importance of these factors.
Field experiments may not be particularly difficult to set up (see, e.g. Srivastava
and Lawton, 1998), by:€(1) selecting a particular microhabitat (such as treeholes,
temporary ponds, moss cushions or tank bromeliads) that is patchily distributed
in a relative small territory (e.g. a valley, a forest patch or a segment of coastline);
(2) measuring or perhaps altering the area, habitat diversity and productivity (in
345
346
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
terms of raw provision of nutrients) of these microhabitats; (3) sterilising them (or
at least washing away as much of the pre-existing communities as possible); (4)
letting these communities develop again by dispersal and colonisation from other
microhabitats in the territory; before (5) measuring the diversity of the resulting
assemblages.
Determining whether the coexistence of some species (or taxa) is determined by
facilitation or exclusion during the assembly process due to the presence of other
species may prove more difficult. One of the most controversial and bitter debates
in ecology during the late twentieth century has been elucidating whether there
are some assembly rules determining the composition of local communities, and
the eventual nature of these rules (for review and synthesis see Gotelli and Graves,
1996; Weiher and Keddy, 1999; Gotelli, 2001; Gotelli and McCabe, 2002; Jenkins,
2006; Sanders et al., 2007). To study their role in microbial communities requires
knowledge of the composition of the assemblage before and after the arrival of any
new species. This makes it extremely difficult to use field experiments to study the
determinants of coexistence and community assembly, although they reveal the
effects of dispersal (Oliveira et al., 2009). Rather, laboratory experiments in controlled conditions, where species are added to previously set up communities, will
be a more effective approach here (see Liess and Diehl, 2006 for an example). One
particular topic that can be studied using field experiments would be the influence of the richness and composition of the species pool on local communities. In
this case, experiments placed in geographically distant territories of environmentally similar regions, together with exhaustive surveys that allow identification of
the whole species pool in each territory, could be used to determine how and to
what extent local communities are shaped by the species available in their pool.
17.3.4╇ Functional diversity and ecosystem functioning
Describing the functional role of species within an ecosystem might at first be
viewed as an unrelated, ‘purely ecological’ research topic. However, the attention
of biogeography and community ecology is shifting to consider the geographic
distribution of functional traits, species interactions and the organisation of the
ecosystems provided by the distributions of these traits and interactions (Naeem
and Wright, 2003; McGill et al., 2006; Petchey and Gaston, 2006; Green et al., 2008;
Schemske et al., 2009). The relationship between biodiversity, biotic interactions
and ecosystem functioning is well studied in microbial systems, particularly soil
communities (Allsopp et al., 1994; Kennedy and Smith, 1995; Heemsbergen et al.,
2004; Bruno et al., 2006; Wardle, 2006; Srivastava and Bell, 2009). New techniques
that facilitate the measurement of traits and functioning in microbial communities (in comparison to macrobes; e.g. Lowe et al., 2005) offer encouraging possibilities for the future pursuit of this particular research topic (Green et al., 2008). This
could be achieved through fieldwork and analyses designed in a similar way to the
g e o g r a p h i c v a r i at i o n i n t h e d i v e r s i t y o f m i c r o b i a l c o m m u n i t i e s
ones argued for macroecology above (section 17.3.2), but measuring specific functional traits and/or facets of ecosystem functioning instead of just the diversity of
the communities and the inputs of materials and energy.
17.4╇ The biogeographer’s wish list:€how microbial
ecology could reinvigorate the development of
biogeographic theory
Adding a biogeographic perspective to the study of the diversity of microorganism
communities will certainly improve current knowledge of their ecology and evolution, their responses to anthropogenic environmental changes, and the effect of
these responses on the ecosystem services they provide. However, the field of biogeography itself stands to gain at least as much from this association. One of the
main limitations of biogeographic research compared with other fields of biology
is that large temporal and spatial scales are not conducive to field experiments,
and when manageable long-term experiments are designed, they are often flawed
by the limited number (or lack) of independent replicates, thus compromising
the generality of the final results. This tends to limit biogeography to conceptual
experi�ments, the analysis of the predictions of null and neutral models, or extrapolating the patterns observed in a few natural experiments such as island groups.
In contrast, the study of microbes may allow measurement of the equivalent
to large-scale biogeographic effects within relatively small extents (see above).
Generation times are also typically shorter than for large-sized organisms, permitting the study of the assembly and development of a community within limited time spans. In addition, they can be (and are) used for closed or semi-open
experiments (i.e. performed in controlled laboratory conditions or natural field
conditions, respectively), thus allowing to work with multiple replicates. Further,
their minute size and the analytical tools currently available make it possible to
measure virtually all components of an ecosystem, from the inputs of energy and
materials, to the species present in the assemblage, the functioning of the ecosystem itself and its output in terms of biomass or ecosystem services.
Here I advocate the use of microscopic organisms for the development of a
purely experimental biogeography of the diversity of biological communities. I
do it in parallel with Jenkins and colleagues (Chapter 15), who propose a similar
approach to the study of the geographic responses and environmental requirements of single species (or similar taxa). This will permit assessing the generality
of many aspects of current biogeographic and macroecological theory, from the
relationship between diversity and productivity/energy, to community composition or metacommunity dynamics. A careful choice of study system is important
in the design of successful field experiments, which may eventually permit the
347
348
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
exhaustive description of variations of microorganism diversity in space. The perfect candidates for such small-scale biogeography are a number of types of microhabitats, such as moss cushions, tank bromeliads, treeholes or temporary ponds,
among others, that often appear scattered across apparently homogeneous territories or land patches (e.g. Gonzalez, 2000). By assuming no dispersal limitations
within a sensible area and amount of time (which are taxon dependent), any field
experiment could assume that this aspect has been controlled for, and therefore
that no effect of dispersal would remain in the results. The scale of the localities
(i.e. microhabitats) to study can allow manipulating dispersal itself, by restricting
the arrival of propagules or inoculating the selected ones.
Implementing microbial experiments for biogeographic research might need
some consideration and preparation. Depending on the system studied, it would
be necessary to determine how transferable the results would be to the macroecological world. Also, some preparatory work may be needed to find a proper way of
taking samples and measure functioning without having spurious effects on the
studied assemblages. Nevertheless, many groups of unicellular organisms, and in
particular bacteria, may not be appropriate for this kind of research, if the goal is to
allow extrapolating the results obtained to macrobes. Their different evolutionary
modes can result in substantially different patterns of diversity from those of any
large-sized organism (e.g. bacteria can rapidly interchange significant amounts of
genetic material, impeding any direct comparison with multicellular organisms).
However, as discussed above, many multicellular microorganisms can be directly
comparable to large-sized organisms in these respects.
Many areas of research in biogeography may benefit from micro-biogeographic
experiments with multicellular microbes. In particular, designing experiments on
island biogeography would be straightforward, providing powerful tools for the
research in many of the current debates and questions in this area. Good examples of currently debated questions that would benefit from these experiments
are:€How predictive are Hubbell’s (2001) Neutral Theory or current models of metacommunity dynamics (e.g. Mouquet and Loureau, 2003)? Which are the influences
of dispersal and connectivity on species assembly (and assemblage composition)?
What is the exact relationship between habitat diversity and species richness, and
to what extent does this depend on area, versus the niche width of the species available in the species pool (Hortal et al., 2009)? How well does the recently proposed
general dynamic theory of oceanic island biogeography (Whittaker et€ al., 2008)
predict the patterns of diversity and regional endemism in microhabitat islands?
How can speciation occur in the absence of proper allopatric populations (i.e. speciation in sympatry; e.g. Phillimore et al., 2008)?
The current theory on the causes and consequences of geographic biodiversity
gradients can also be largely improved by studying the variations in the diversity of microbes across relatively small territories. Despite the level of knowledge
g e o g r a p h i c v a r i at i o n i n t h e d i v e r s i t y o f m i c r o b i a l c o m m u n i t i e s
on the latitudinal diversity gradient reached to date, its causes are still under
debate. The role and relative importance of several processes in shaping species richness gradients is still unknown (i.e. water-energy dynamics, energy
and/or resource availability, regional constraints and other historical effects
and temporal changes, among others; Hawkins et al., 2003a, 2003b, 2007; Willig
et al., 2003; Currie et al., 2004; Wiens and Donoghue, 2004; Storch et al., 2006;
Mittelbach et al., 2007; Ricklefs, 2007; Hawkins, 2008; Hortal et al., 2008; Qian
and Ricklefs, 2008). Further, the study of microbial communities may help in the
understanding of the geographic variations in functional diversity, including
gradients in functional traits (e.g. Diniz-Filho et al., 2009), functional structure
(e.g. Rodríguez et€a l., 2006), or the effects of these spatial variations on ecosystem
functioning and resilience.
17.5╇ Conclusion
The biogeography of microbial communities is in large part not qualitatively different from the biogeography of macroorganisms. Under current levels of knowledge, most differences between macro- and micro-assemblages are due to the
large dispersal potential of microbes and their affinity to microhabitats. This
results in a different scaling of the distance decay in community similarity and
a higher patchiness of microbe communities. However, the current lack of knowledge on the geographic variations of microorganisms is still a challenge for both
microbiologists and biogeographers. In my opinion, further research on microbial biogeography will not find the processes underlying the assembly of microbe
communities to be fundamentally different from the ones already described for
macrobes. Rather, the similarity between macrobial and microbial communities allows for the examining of biogeographic theory with a completely different
perspective using microbes. Thus, here I argue for the development of an experimental research programme in microbial biogeography. Regardless of which particular question is studied, I am certain that the biogeography of small things and
the experimental approach it permits will generate significant advances in biogeographic theory.
Acknowledgements
I wish to thank Diego Fontaneto for the invitation to write this chapter and par�
ticipate in the corresponding symposium, and to an anonymous referee for a
thoughtful review of the previous version of this manuscript. I am also indebted
to Noemi Guil, Sara Sánchez Moreno and Diego Fontaneto, for introducing me to
the world of the very very small things, as well as for many insightful discussions
349
350
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
throughout the last ten years. JH is funded by a Spanish CSIC JAE-Doc research
grant, and obtained additional funding from a travel grant of the Azorean
Biodiversity Group€– CITA-A.
References
Allsopp, D., Hawksworth, D.L.,
Colwell,€R.R. (1994). Microbial
biodiversity and ecosystem function.
CAB International, Wallington.
Avise, J.C. (2009). Phylogeography:
retrospect and prospect. Journal of
Biogeography 36, 3–15.
Azovsky, A.I. (2002). Size-dependent
species–area relationships in
benthos:€is the world more diverse for
microbes? Ecography 25, 273–282.
Baas Becking, L.G.M. (1934). Geobiologie
of inleiding tot de milieukunde.
The€Hague:€Van Stockum and Zoon.
Beijerinck, M.W. (1913). De infusies en de
ontdekking der bakterien. In: Jaarboek
van de Koninklijke Akademie van
Wetenschappen. 1–28.
Bell, T., Ager, D., Song, J.-I., Newman,
J.A., Thompson, I.P., Lilley, A.K., van
der Gast, C.J. (2005). Larger islands
house more bacterial taxa. Science
308, 1884.
Bjorholm, S., Svenning, J.-C., Skov, F.,
Balslev, H. (2008). To what extent does
Tobler’s 1st law of geography apply to
macroecology? A case study using
American palms (Arecaceae). BMC
Ecology 8, 11.
Bohonak, A.J., Jenkins, D.G. (2003).
Ecological and evolutionary
significance of dispersal by freshwater
invertebrates. Ecology Letters 6,
783–796.
Bruno, J.F., Lee, S.C., Kertesz, J.S. et al.
(2006). Partitioning the effects of
algal species identity and richness on
benthic marine primary production.
Oikos 115, 170–178.
Cáceres, C.E . (1997). Dormancy in
invertebrates. Invertebrate Biology 116,
371–383.
Coleman, A.W. (2002). Microbial
eukaryote species. Science 297,
337–337.
Currie, D.J., Mittelbach, G.G., Cornell, H.V.
et al. (2004). Predictions and tests of
climate-based hypotheses of broadscale variation in taxonomic richness.
Ecology Letters 7, 1121–1134.
de Wit, R., Bouvier, T. (2006). ‘Everything
is everywhere, but the environment
selects’; what did Baas Becking and
Beijerinck really say? Environmental
Microbiology 8, 755–758.
Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., Rodríguez, M.Á., Bini,
L.M. et al. (2009). Climate history,
human impacts and global body size
of carnivora at multiple evolutionary
scales. Journal of Biogeography 36,
2222–2236.
Dunn, R.R., Agosti, D., Andersen, A.N.
et al. (2009). Climatic drivers of
hemispheric asymmetry in global
patterns of ant species richness.
Ecology Letters 12, 324–333.
Fenchel, T. (1993). There are more
small€than large species. Oikos 68,
375–378.
Fenchel, T., Finlay, B.J. (2003). Is microbial
diversity fundamentally different
from biodiversity of larger animals
and plants? European Journal of
Protistology 39, 486–490.
g e o g r a p h i c v a r i at i o n i n t h e d i v e r s i t y o f m i c r o b i a l c o m m u n i t i e s
Fenchel, T., Finlay, B.J. (2004). The ubiquity
of small species:€Patterns of local and
global diversity. Bioscience 54, 777–784.
Fenchel, T., Finlay, B.J. (2006). The diversity
of microbes:€resurgence of the
phenotype. Philosophical Transactions
of the Royal Society B 361, 1965–1973.
Finlay, B.J. (2002). Global dispersal of
free-living microbial eukaryote
species. Science 296, 1061–1063.
Finlay, B.J., Fenchel, T. (2004).
Cosmopolitan metapopulations of
free-living microbial eukaryotes.
Protist 155, 237–244.
Finlay, B.J., Corliss, J.O., Esteban, G.,
Fenchel, T. (1996a). Biodiversity at
the microbial level:€The number of
free-living ciliates in the biosphere.
Quarterly Review of Biology 71,
221–237.
Finlay, B.J., Esteban, G.F., Fenchel, T.
(1996b). Global diversity and body size.
Nature 383, 132–133.
Finlay, B.J., Esteban, G.F., Fenchel, T.
(1998). Protozoan diversity:€converging
estimates of the global number of freeliving ciliate species. Protist 149, 29–37.
Finlay, B.J., Esteban, G.F., Olmo, J.L., Tyler,
P.A. (1999). Global distribution of freeliving microbial species. Ecography 22,
138–144.
Finlay, B.J., Esteban, G.F., Clarke, K.J.,
Olmo, J.L. (2001). Biodiversity
of terrestrial protozoa appears
homogeneous across local and global
spatial scales. Protist 152, 355–366.
Finlay, B.J., Esteban, G.F., Brown, S.,
Fenchel, T., Hoef- Emden, K. (2006).
Multiple cosmopolitan ecotypes
within a microbial eukaryote
morphospecies. Protist 157, 377–390.
Foissner, W. (2006). Biogeography and
dispersal of micro-organisms:€A
review emphasizing protists. Acta
Protozoologica 45, 111–136.
Foissner, W. (2008). Protist diversity
and distribution:€some basic
considerations. Biodiversity and
Conservation 17, 235–242.
Fontaneto, D., Ricci, C. (2006). Spatial
gradients in species diversity of
microscopic animals:€the case of
bdelloid rotifers at high altitude.
Journal of Biogeography 33, 1305–1313.
Fontaneto, D., Hortal, J. (2008). Do
microorganisms have biogeography?
IBS Newsletter 6.2, 3–8.
Fontaneto, D., Ficetola, G.F., Ambrosini,
R., Ricci, C. (2006). Patterns of diversity
in microscopic animals:€are they
comparable to those in protists or in
larger animals? Global Ecology and
Biogeography 15, 153–162.
Fontaneto, D., Barraclough, T.G., Chen,
K., Ricci, C., Herniou, E.A. (2008a).
Molecular evidence for broadscale distributions in bdelloid
rotifers:€everything is not everywhere
but most things are very widespread.
Molecular Ecology 17, 3136–3146.
Fontaneto, D., Boschetti, C., Ricci, C.
(2008b). Cryptic diversification in
ancient asexuals:€evidence from the
bdelloid rotifer Philodina flaviceps.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21,
580–587.
Fontaneto, D., Kaya, M., Herniou,
E.A., Barraclough, T.G. (2009).
Extreme levels of hidden diversity
in microscopic animals (Rotifera)
revealed by DNA taxonomy. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 53,
182–189.
Frahm, J.P. (2008). Diversity, dispersal and
biogeography of bryophytes (mosses).
Biodiversity and Conservation 17,
277–284.
Fukami, T., Morin, P.J. (2003).
Productivity-biodiversity
relationships depend on the history
351
352
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
of community assembly. Nature 424,
423–426.
Genner, M.J., Taylor, M.I., Cleary, D.F.R.
et al. (2004). Beta diversity of rockrestricted cichlid fishes in Lake Malawi:
importance of environmental and
spatial factors. Ecography 27, 601–610.
Gómez, A., Montero-Pau, J., Lunt,
D.H., Serra, M., Campillo, S. (2007).
Persistent genetic signatures
of colonization in Brachionus
manjavacas rotifers in the Iberian
Peninsula. Molecular Ecology 16,
3228–3240.
Gonzalez, A. (2000). Community
relaxation in fragmented
landscapes:€the relation between
species richness, area and age. Ecology
Letters 3, 441–448.
Gotelli, N.J. (2001). Research frontiers in
null model analysis. Global Ecology
and Biogeography 10, 337–343.
Gotelli, N.J., Graves, G.R. (1996). Null
models in ecology. Smithsonian
Institution Press, Washington, D. C.
Gotelli, N.J., McCabe, D.J . (2002). Species
co-occurrence:€a meta-analysis of
J.€M. Diamond’s assembly rules model.
Ecology 83, 2091–2096.
Green, J., Bohannan, B.J.M. (2006). Spatial
scaling of microbial biodiversity.
Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21,
501–507.
Green, J.L., Holmes, A.J., Westoby, M. et€al.
(2004). Spatial scaling of microbial
eukaryote diversity. Nature 432,
747–750.
Green, J.L., Bohannan, B.J.M.,
Whitaker, R.J. (2008). Microbial
Biogeography:€From Taxonomy to
Traits. Science 320, 1039–1043.
Grenyer, R., Orme, C.D.L., Jackson, S.F.
et al. (2006). Global distribution and
conservation of rare and threatened
vertebrates. Nature 444, 93–96.
Guil, N. (2008). New records and
within-species variability of Iberian
tardigrades (Tardigrada), with
comments on the species from the
Echiniscus blumi-canadensis series.
Zootaxa 1757, 1–30.
Guil, N., Giribet, G. (2009). Fine
scale population structure in the
Echiniscus blumi-canadensis series
(Heterotardigrada, Tardigrada) in
an Iberian mountain range—When
morphology fails to explain genetic
structure. Molecular Phylogenetics and
Evolution 51, 606–613.
Guil, N., Hortal, J., Sánchez-Moreno, S.,
Machordom, A. (2009a). Effects of
macro and micro-environmental
factors on the species richness of
terrestrial tardigrade assemblages in
an Iberian mountain environment.
Landscape Ecology 24, 375–390.
Guil, N., Sánchez-Moreno, S., Machordom,
A. (2009b). Local biodiversity patterns
in micrometazoans:€Are tardigrades
everywhere? Systematics and
Biodiversity 7, 259–268.
Hawkins, B.A. (2008). Recent progress toward
understanding the global diversity
gradient. IBS Newsletter 6.1, 5–8.
Hawkins, B.A. (2010). Multiregional
comparison of the ecological and
phylogenetic structure of butterfly
species richness gradients. Journal of
Biogeography 37, 647–656.
Hawkins, B.A., Porter, E.E., Diniz-Filho,
J.A.F. (2003a). Productivity and
history as predictors of the latitudinal
diversity gradient of terrestrial birds.
Ecology 84, 1608–1623.
Hawkins, B.A., Field, R., Cornell, H.V. et€al.
(2003b). Energy, water, and broadscale geographic patterns of species
richness. Ecology 84, 3105–3117.
Hawkins, B.A., Diniz-Filho, J.A.F.,
Jaramillo, C.A., Soeller, S.A. (2007).
g e o g r a p h i c v a r i at i o n i n t h e d i v e r s i t y o f m i c r o b i a l c o m m u n i t i e s
Climate, niche conservatism, and
the global bird diversity gradient. The
American Naturalist 170, S16-S27.
Heemsbergen, D.A., Berg, M.P., Loreau, M.
et al. (2004). Biodiversity effects on soil
processes explained by interspecific
functional dissimilarity. Science 306,
1019–1020.
Hortal, J., Nieto, M., Rodríguez, J.,
Lobo,€J.M. (2005). Evaluating the roles
of connectivity and environment on
faunal turnover:€patterns in recent and
fossil Iberian mammals. In:€Elewa,
A.M.T. (ed.) Migration in Organisms.
Climate, Geography, Ecology, Springer,
Berlin. 301–327.
Hortal, J., Rodríguez, J., Nieto-Díaz,€M.,
Lobo, J.M. (2008). Regional and
environmental effects on the species
richness of mammal assemblages.
Journal of Biogeography 35, 1202–1214.
Hortal, J., Triantis, K.A., Meiri, S.,
Thébault, E., Sfenthourakis, S. (2009).
Island species richness increases with
habitat diversity. American Naturalist
173, E205-E217.
Hubbell, S.P. (2001). The unified
neutral theory of biodiversity and
biogeography. Princeton University
Press, Princeton.
Huston, M.A. (1999). Local processes and
regional patterns:€appropriate scales
for understanding variation in the
diversity of plants and animals. Oikos
86, 393–401.
Jankowski, T., Weyhenmeyer, G.A. (2006).
The role of spatial scale and area in
determining richness-altitude gradients
in Swedish lake phytoplankton
communities. Oikos 115, 433–442.
Jay-Robert, P., Lobo, J.M., Lumaret, J.P.
(1997). Altitudinal turnover and
species richness variation in European
montane dung beetle assemblages.
Arctic and Alpine Research 29, 196–205.
Jenkins, D.G. (1995). Dispersal-limited
zooplankton distribution and
community composition in new
ponds. Hydrobiologia 313, 15–20.
Jenkins, D.G. (2006). In search of
quorum effects in metacommunity
structure:€Species co-occurrence
analyses. Ecology 87, 1523–1531.
Jenkins, D.G., Underwood, M.O. (1998).
Zooplankton may not disperse
readily in wind, rain, or waterfowl.
Hydrobiologia 388, 15–21.
Jenkins, D.G., Brescacin, C.R.,
Duxbury,€C.V. et al. (2007). Does
size matter for dispersal distance?
Global Ecology and Biogeography 16,
415–425.
Kaya, M., Herniou, E.A., Barraclough, T.G.,
Fontaneto, D. (2009). Inconsistent
estimates of diversity between
traditional and DNA taxonomy in
bdelloid rotifers. Organisms Diversity
and Evolution 9, 3–12.
Kellogg, C.A., Griffin, D.W. (2006).
Aerobiology and the global transport
of desert dust. Trends in Ecology and
Evolution 21, 638–644.
Kennedy, A.C., Smith, K.L. (1995).
Soil microbial diversity and the
sustainability of agricultural soils.
Plant and Soil 170, 75–86.
Kreft, H., Jetz, W. (2007). Global patterns
and determinants of vascular plant
diversity. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences USA 104,
5925–5930.
Laakso, J., Setälä, H. (1999). Sensitivity
of primary production to changes in
the architecture of belowground food
webs. Oikos 87, 57–64.
Liess, A., Diehl, S. (2006). Effects of
enrichment on protist abundances
and bacterial composition in simple
microbial communities. Oikos 114,
15–26.
353
354
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Lomolino, M.V., Riddle, B.R., Brown, J.H.
(2006). Biogeography. Third Edition.
Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland,
Massachussets.
Lowe, C.D., Kemp, S.J., Montagnes,
D.J.S. (2005). An interdisciplinary
approach€to assess the functional
diversity of free-living microscopic
eukaryotes. Aquatic Microbial Ecology
41, 67–77.
MacArthur, R.H., Wilson, E.O. (1963).
An equilibrium theory of insular
zoogeography. Evolution 17, 373–387.
MacArthur, R.H., Wilson, E.O. (1967).
The theory of island biogeography.
Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Mann, D.G., Droop, S.J.M. (1996).
Biodiversity, biogeography
and conservation of diatoms.
Hydrobiologia 336, 19–32.
Martiny, J.B.H., Bohannan, B.J.M.,
Brown, J.H. et al. (2006).
Microbial biogeography:€putting
microorganisms on the map. Nature
Reviews Microbiology 4, 102–112.
McGill, B.J., Enquist, B.J., Weiher, E.,
Westoby, M. (2006). Rebuilding
community ecology from functional
traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution
21, 178–185.
Mikheyev, A.S., Vo, T., Mueller, U.G. (2008).
Phylogeography of post-Pleistocene
population expansion in a fungusgardening ant and its microbial
mutualists. Molecular Ecology 17,
4480–4488.
Mills, S., Lunt, D.H., Gómez, A . (2007).
Global isolation by distance despite
strong regional phylogeography in a
small metazoan. BMC Evolutionary
Biology 7, 225.
Mittelbach, G.G., Schemske, D.W.,
Cornell, H.V. et al. (2007). Evolution
and the latitudinal diversity
gradient:€speciation, extinction and
biogeography. Ecology Letters 10,
315–331.
Mouquet, N., Loreau, M. (2003).
Community patterns in sourcesink metacommunities. American
Naturalist 162, 544–557.
Naeem, S., Wright, J.P. (2003).
Disentangling biodiversity effects
on ecosystem functioning:€deriving
solutions to a seemingly
insurmountable problem. Ecology
Letters 6, 567–579.
Naeslund, B., Norberg, J. (2006). Ecosystem
consequences of the regional species
pool. Oikos 115, 504–512.
Nekola, J.C., White, P.S. (1999). The
distance decay of similarity in
biogeography and ecology. Journal of
Biogeography 26, 867–878.
Obertegger, U., Thaler, B., Flaim, G.
(2010). Rotifer species richness along
an altitudinal gradient in the Alps.
Global Ecology and Biogeography 79,
895–904.
Oliveira, S.M., ter Steege, H., Cornelissen,
J.H.C., Gradstein, S.R. (2009). Niche
assembly of epiphytic bryophyte
communities in the Guianas:€a
regional approach. Journal of
Biogeography 36, 2076–2084.
O’Malley, M.A . (2007). The nineteenth
century roots of ‘everything is
everywhere’. Nature Reviews
Microbiology 5, 647–651.
O’Malley, M.A . (2008). ‘Everything is
everywhere:€but the environment
selects’:€ubiquitous distribution and
ecological determinism in microbial
biogeography. Studies in History and
Philosophy of Science C 39, 314–325.
Pawlowski, J., Holzman, M. (2008).
Diversity and geographic distribution
of benthic foraminifera:€a molecular
perspective. Biodiversity and
Conservation 17, 317–328.
g e o g r a p h i c v a r i at i o n i n t h e d i v e r s i t y o f m i c r o b i a l c o m m u n i t i e s
Petchey, O.L., Gaston, K.J. (2006).
Functional diversity:€back to basics
and looking forward. Ecology Letters 9,
741–758.
Phillimore, A.B., Orme, C.D.L., Thomas,
G.H. et al. (2008). Sympatric speciation
in birds is rare:€Insights from range
data and simulations. American
Naturalist 171, 646–657.
Polis, G.A., Anderson, W.B., Holt, R.D.
(2003). Toward an integration of
landscape and food web ecology:€The
dynamics of spatially subsidized food
webs. Annual Review of Ecology and
Systematics 28, 289–316.
Prosser, J.I., Bohannan, B.J.M., Curtis,
T.P. et al. (2007). The role of ecological
theory in microbial ecology. Nature
Reviews Microbiology 5, 384–392.
Qian, H., Ricklefs, R.E. (2008). Global
concordance in diversity patterns
of vascular plants and terrestrial
vertebrates. Ecology Letters 11, 547–553.
Rahbek, C. (1995). The elevational gradient
of species richness€– a uniform pattern.
Ecography 18, 200–205.
Rahbek, C. (2005). The role of spatial scale
and the perception of large-scale
species richness patterns. Ecology
Letters 8, 224–239.
Ricklefs, R.E. (1987). Community
diversity:€Relative roles of local and
regional processes. Science 235,
167–171.
Ricklefs, R.E. (2004). A comprehensive
framework for global patterns in
biodiversity. Ecology Letters 7, 1–15.
Ricklefs, R.E. (2007). History and
diversity:€explorations at the
intersection of ecology and evolution.
American Naturalist 170, S56-S70.
Rodríguez, J., Hortal, J., Nieto, M. (2006).
An evaluation of the influence of
environment and biogeography on
community structure:€the case of
the Holarctic mammals. Journal of
Biogeography 33, 291–303.
Rosenzweig, M.L. (1995). Species diversity
in space and time. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.
Sánchez-Moreno, S., Ferris, H., Guil,€N.
(2008). Role of tardigrades in the
suppressive service of a soil food
web. Agriculture, Ecosystems and
Environment 124, 187–192.
Sanders, N.J., Gotelli, N.J., Wittman,
S.E. et al. (2007). Assembly rules of
ground-foraging ant assemblages are
contingent on disturbance, habitat and
spatial scale. Journal of Biogeography
34, 1632–1641.
Santos, A.M.C., Whittaker, R.J.,
Triantis, K.A. et al. (2010). Are
species–area relationships from
entire archipelagos congruent with
those of their constituent islands?
Global Ecology and Biogeography 19,
527–540.
Schemske, D.W., Mittelbach, G.G., Cornell,
H.V., Sobel, J.M., Roy, K. (2009). Is
there a latitudinal gradient in the
importance of biotic interactions?
Annual Review of Ecology Evolution
and Systematics 40, 245–269.
Schipper, J., Chanson, J.S., Chiozza, F.
et€a l. (2008). The status of the world’s
land and marine mammals:€diversity,
threat, and knowledge. Science 322,
225–230.
Segers, H., De Smet, W.H. (2008). Diversity
and endemism in Rotifera:€a review,
and Keratella Bory de St Vincent.
Biodiversity and Conservation 17,
303–316.
Smith, V.H., Foster, B.L., Grover, J.P. et al.
(2005). Phytoplankton species richness
scales consistently from laboratory
microcosms to the world’s oceans.
Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences USA 102, 4393–4396.
355
356
biogeogr a phy of microscopic org anisms
Smith, H.G., Wilkinson, D.M. (2007). Not
all free-living microorganisms have
cosmopolitan distributions€– the
case of Nebela (Apodera) vas Certes
(Protozoa:€Amoebozoa:€Arcellinida).
Journal of Biogeography 34,
1822–1831.
Smith, H.G., Bobrov, A., Lara, E. (2008).
Diversity and biogeography of
testate amoebae. Biodiversity and
Conservation 17, 329–343.
Soininen, J., McDonald, R., Hillebrand, H.
(2007). The distance decay of similarity
in ecological communities. Ecography
30, 3–12.
Spribille, T., Björk, C.R., Exman, S. et al.
(2009). Contributions to an epiphytic
lichen flora of northwest North
America:€I. Eight new species from
British Columbia inland rain forests.
Bryologist 112, 109–137.
Srivastava, D.S., Lawton, J.H. (1998). Why
more productive sites have more
species:€An experimental test of
theory using tree-hole communities.
American Naturalist 152, 510–529.
Srivastava, D.S., Bell, T. (2009). Reducing
horizontal and vertical diversity in
a foodweb triggers extinctions and
impacts functions. Ecology Letters 12,
1016–1028.
Steinitz, O., Heller, J., Tsoar, A., Rotem,
D., Kadmon, R. (2006). Environment,
dispersal and patterns of species
similarity. Journal of Biogeography 33,
1044–1054.
Storch, D., Davies, R.G., Zajicek,€S.
et€al. (2006). Energy, range
dynamics and global species
richness patterns:€reconciling middomain effects and environmental
determinants of avian diversity.
Ecology Letters 9, 1308–1320.
Taylor, J.W., Turner, E., Townsend, J.P.,
Dettman, J.R., Jacobson, D. (2006).
Eukaryotic microbes, species
recognition and the geographic limits
of species:€examples from the kingdom
Fungi. Philosophical Transactions of
the Royal Society B 361, 1947–1963.
Telford, R.J., Vandvik, V., Birks, H.J.B.
(2006). Dispersal limitations matter for
microbial morphospecies. Science 312,
1015.
Triantis, K.A., Mylonas, M., Lika,
K., Vardinoyannis, K. (2003). A
model for€the species–area–habitat
relationship. Journal of Biogeography
30, 19–27.
Valdecasas, A.G., Camacho, A.I., Peláez,
M.L . (2006). Do small animals have
a biogeography? Experimental and
Applied Acarology 40, 133–144.
van der Gast, C.J., Lilley, Andrew K., Ager,
D., Thompson, I.P. (2005). Island
size and bacterial diversity in an
archipelago of engineering machines.
Environmental Microbiology 7,
1220–1226.
Vanormelingen, P., Verleyen, E.,
Vyverman, W. (2008). The diversity
and distribution of diatoms:€from
cosmopolitanism to narrow
endemism. Biodiversity and
Conservation 17, 393–405.
Verleyen, E., Vyverman, W., Sterken,
M. et al. (2009). The importance of
dispersal related and local factors in
shaping the taxonomic structure of
diatom metacommunities. Oikos 118,
1239–1249.
Vos, M., Velicer, G.J. (2008). Isolation by
distance in the spore-forming soil
bacterium Myxococcus xanthus.
Current Biology 18, 386–391.
Wardle, D.A. (2006). The influence of
biotic interactions on soil biodiversity.
Ecology Letters 9, 870–886.
Weiher, E., Keddy, P. (1999). Ecological
assembly rules:€Perspectives, advances,
g e o g r a p h i c v a r i at i o n i n t h e d i v e r s i t y o f m i c r o b i a l c o m m u n i t i e s
retreats. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge.
Weisse, T. (2008). Distribution and
diversity of aquatic protists:€an
evolutionary and ecological
perspective. Biodiversity and
Conservation 17, 243–259.
Whitaker, R.J., Grogan, D.W., Taylor,
J.W. (2003). Geographic barriers
isolate endemic populations of
hyperthermophilic archaea. Science
301, 976–978.
Whitfield, J. (2005). Biogeography:€is
everything everywhere? Science 310,
960–961.
Whittaker, R.H. (1972). Evolution and
measurement of species diversity.
Taxon 21, 213–251.
Whittaker, R.J., Fernández-Palacios, J.M.
(2007). Island biogeography. Ecology,
evolution, and conservation. Second
edition. Oxford University Press,
Oxford.
Whittaker, R.J., Triantis, K.A., Ladle, R.J.
(2008). A general dynamic theory of
oceanic island biogeography. Journal
of Biogeography 35, 977–994.
Wiens, J.J., Donoghue, M.J. (2004).
Historical biogeography, ecology and
species richness. Trends in Ecology and
Evolution 19, 639–644.
Wilkinson, D.M. (2001). What is the upper
size limit for cosmopolitan distribution
in free-living microorganisms? Journal
of Biogeography 28, 285–291.
Wilkinson, D.M. (2010). Have we
underestimated the importance of
humans in the biogeography of freeliving terrestrial microorganisms?
Journal of Biogeography 37, 393–397.
Willig, M.R., Kaufman, D.M., Stevens,
R.D. (2003). Latitudinal gradients of
biodiversity:€Pattern, process, scale,
and synthesis. Annual Review of
Ecology Evolution and Systematics 34,
273–309.
Wright, D.H. (1983). Species–energy
theory€— an extension of species–area
theory. Oikos 41, 496–506.
Xu, S., Hebert, P.D.N., Kotov, A.A.,
Cristescu, M.E. (2009). The
noncosmopolitanism paradigm of
freshwater zooplankton:€insights
from the global phylogeography of
the predatory cladoceran Polyphemus
pediculus (Linnaeus, 1761) (Crustacea,
Onychopoda). Molecular Ecology 18,
5161–5179.
357
Index
16S rDNA, 45, 50, 51, 54
18S rDNA, 62, 291
5.8S rDNA, 88
abundance, 4, 9, 36, 37, 103, 202, 313, 320, 325
abundance-range, 313
abundant-centre, 311
size abundance, 313
Actinella, 25
Actinolaimidae, 265
Actinomycetales, 52
adaptation, 320
Adineta, 100
Aeribacillus pallidus, 54
alkane biodegradation, 49
allopatric speciation, See€speciation
Alocodera cockayni, 112
Alopex lagopus, 186
altitudinal gradient, 340, 355
Amanita muscaria, 179
Amanita pantherina, 179, 180
Amoebozoa, 112
Amphorotia, 23, 24, 25
Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism
(AFLP), 96, 102, 147
Amplified Ribosomal DNA Restriction
Analyses (ARDRA), 45
Amplified Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer
Analysis (ARISA), 37
anabiosis, 64
Anastrophyllum saxicola, 217
ancient endemism, 39
angiosperm, 209, 210, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240
anhydrobiosis, 64, 261
Annalisella bermudensis, 271
annelid, See€Annelida
Annelida, 318
Anomobryum lusitanicum, 213
Anthocerotophyta, 209, 212
Apodera vas, 89, 112, 113, 115, 116, 122
Aporcelaimidae, 266
Arcellinida testate amoebae, 8, 112, 113
Archaea, 18, 35, 37, 38, 39, 54, 318
Artemia, 289
Ascomycota, 131, 132, 191, 193
Asplenium azoricum, 238
Asterionella formosa, 81
Aureobasidium pullulans, 164
Baas Becking, Lourens G.M., 12, 13, 14, 43, 88,
113, 114
Baas-Becking hypothesis, 54, 55, 238, 241
Bacillus, 45, 51
Bacillus aestuarii, 51
bacteria, 18, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 45, 46, 48, 50, 51,
54, 55, 64, 77, 112, 122, 133, 134, 153, 157,
158, 290, 318, 326
cyanobacteria, 36, 39, 191, 192, 193
hermophilic bacteria, 6
mesophilic bacteria, 45, 49
psycrophilic bacteria, 50
salt marsh bacteria, 38
thermophilic bacteria, 7, 44, 45, 46, 50, 51,
52, 53
tree hole bacteria, 38
base substitution, 180
Basidiomycota, 131, 132, 191, 193
bdelloid rotifer, See€Rotifera
Beijerinck, Martinus Willem, 12, 17, 43, 88, 113
beta-tubulin, 99
biculture effect, 157
bioaugmentation, 50
biogeographic barriers, 214
index
biosolubilisation, 50
biostimulation, 50
Bothrioplana semperi, 269
Brachionidae, 251
Brachionus havanaensis, 80
Brachionus plicatilis, 330
bryophyte, 8, 62, 64, 79, 114, 115, 116, 192,
209–26, 249, 253, 265, 269, 288, 291, 318,
336, 340, 342, 345, 348
disjunct range, 218
diversity patterns, 220
endemic range, 213–16
phylogeography, 220–25
wide distribution, 213
cacti, 132–35
cactophilic yeast, 8, 130–31, 132–65
Caenorhabditis, 263
Caenorhabditis briggsae, 267
Caenorhabditis elegans, 267
calibration points, 39, 225
Calohypsibiidae, 254
Campyloderes macquariae, 258, 259
Campyloderes vanhoeffeni, 258, 259
Campylopus pilifer, 223
Candelariella biatorina, 193
Candida ipomoeae, 164
Candida sonorensis, 140, 141, 147, 148, 149, 150
Carboniferous, 234
Carphania, 254
Carphaniidae, 254
Catenulida, 268, 269, 271
Cavernularia hultenii, 196, 199
Centropyxis, 112
Certesella, 89, 112, 113, 115, 116, 122
Cervidellus, 265
Cetraria aculeata, 196
Cetraria muricata, 196
Chaetonotidae, 247, 248
Chilodonellidae, 77–80
chloroplast rbcL, 99
Chroococcidiopsis, 39
Chroodiscus, 195
chrysophyte, 89, 103
circumpolar distribution, 178, 186, 195, 196, 198
Cladocera, 318
Cladonia arbuscula, 198
Cladonia coniocraea, 195
Cladonia mitis, 198
Cladonia rangiferina, 196
classification, 7, 17–20, 253, 254
climate change, 98, 178, 311, 343
coalescent analysis, 179, 180, 181, 185
Colliculoamphora, 24, 25
colonisation, 38, 54, 102, 124, 134, 158, 213,
221, 222, 236, 238, 252, 289, 290, 293, 299
Colpidium kleinii, 64
Colpodea, 68, 71
Colpidium colpoda, 63
commensal, 255
community diversity, 37
comparative biogeography, 17
comparative phylogeographic analyses, 178
confocal microscopy, 248
continental drift, 9, 62, 194, 197, 217, 225, 247, 270
Copepoda, 318
Cortinarius favrei, 179
Coscinodiscus wailesii, 80
Cosmognathia, 260
cosmopolitan model, 61
cosmopolitanism, 7, 122, 161, 248, 251, 292,
327, 328, 329, 338
Cretaceous, 236, 253
cryptic species, 122, 195, 200, 221, 222, 252,
256, 260, 271, 285, 291–92, See€also€species
complex
cryptobiosis, 253, 261, 298
Cycliophora, 245, 255–56
cycliophoran. See€Cycliophora
cytochrome b (COb), 292
cytochrome c oxidase I (COI), 95, 96, 99, 100,
102, 248, 291, 292, 295, 296, 298
Dactylina arctica, 179
Daphnia, 289
Daphnia magna, 329
Darwin, Charles, 15, 16, 17, 20, 112, 113
Origin of Species, 15
Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis
(DGGE), 37, 38, 39
denitrification, 46, 47
Deparia petersenii, 239
Devonian, 234
diatoms, 7, 16, 18, 80, 81, 89, 339, 341
biogeography, 20–25
evolution, 20–25
Difflugia, 112
Dikarya, 131
Diphascon pingue, 254
Diplogasteromorpha, 263
Diplogastridae, 266
359
360
index
disjunct distribution, 8, 19, 141, 178, 196, 197,
217, 218, 223, 224
dispersal, 54
air current, 62, 64, 82, 213, 216, 235
anthropogenic, 8, 9, 16, 62, 64, 80–81, 82,
102, 123, 124, 133, 161, 162, 177, 225, 240,
263, 270, 293, 324, 344
ballast, 80, 247, 270
drifting sea ice, 186, 269
driftwood, 186, 269
dust devil, 261
flood, 270
long-distance dispersal, 9, 102, 115, 123,
178, 179, 185, 186, 187, 194, 195, 197, 198,
199, 200, 213, 214, 216, 217, 218, 222, 223,
224, 225, 226, 235, 324, 326, 329, 331
phoresy, 64, 82, 102, 123, 131, 152, 158, 161,
162, 163, 165, 186, 211, 247, 248, 249, 263,
269, 285, 286, 295, 320, 324
bird, 16, 102, 123, 187, 198, 235, 238, 266,
324, 329
mammal, 324
rafting, 247, 269
trade of fauna and flora, 270
water current, 63, 187, 247, 259, 270
wind, 51, 113, 122, 123, 132, 133, 159, 161,
164, 165, 186, 188, 197, 198, 211, 216, 218,
220, 225, 235, 239, 241, 253, 262, 285,
286, 295, 324
dispersal barriers, 240, 327
dispersal limitation, 8, 38, 39, 40, 81, 197, 236,
237, 240, 314, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 331, 348
dispersal rate, 4, 35, 54, 99, 102, 285, 288, 326
distance decay, 6, 38, 39, 40, 220, 339, 342, 349
DNA repairing systems, 290, 295
dormancy, See€also€resting stages67, 249, 284,
285, 289–90, 291, 295, 299, 320
dormant stage, 8, 62, 66, 249, 285, 286, 288,
289, 326, 327
dormant stage bank, 328
dormant stage survival, 289–90
Dorylaimida, 262
Dorylaimus, 263, 264
Dorylaimus stagnalis, 265
Draculiciteria tesselata, 248
Drosophila, 133, 153–61
Drosophila mettleri, 133
Dryopteris azorica, 238
Dryopteris crispifolia, 238
Echinicus testudo, 296
Echiniscidae, 254
Echiniscus, 253, 296
Echiniscus arctomys, 254
Echiniscus testudo, 296
Echinoderes dujardinii, 258
Echinoderes kozloffi, 258
Echinodium, 222
ecological biogeography, 6
ecological specialisation, 293, 325
ecovar, 36
Ehrenberg, Christian Gottfried, 20, 22, 112
Emiliania huxleyi, 80
enclave distribution, 329, 331
encystment, 67, 71, 77, 79, 123, 269
circatidal encystment, 77
encystment genes, 67
endemic distribution, 8, 196–97
endemism, 19, 25, 40, 99, 102, 122, 131, 134, 136,
139, 148, 152, 153, 158, 159, 161, 162, 163, 164,
185, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 254, 263, 292, 298
narrow endemism, 140, 141, 146, 148, 149,
152, 158, 161, 213
environmental gradient, 202, 326, 327, 340, 342, 344
environmental heterogeneity, 38, 39, 339
environmental sequencing, 5, 6
Eocene, 236, 253
Ereptonema, 265
Erioderma pedicellatum, 196
establishment, 51, 103, 123, 124, 197, 211, 213,
215, 216, 221, 236, 325
Eudorylaimus, 263, 264
Eudorylaimus antarcticus, 262
Euglyphida testate amoebae, 113
Eumonhystera filiformis, 266
Eumonhystera longicaudatula, 266
Eunophora, 24
Eunotia, 25
eurytopic distribution, 265
Eutardigrada, 253, 296
Everything is Everywhere hypothesis (EiE),
3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 13, 17, 88, 89, 90, 96, 99, 102,
130, 131, 140, 145, 148, 149, 153, 161, 164,
284, 285, 290, 293, 295, 298, 310, 311, 312,
313, 314, 318, 320, 337, 338
experimental biogeography, 9, 347
extinction, 3, 12, 54, 310, 320, 344
Echinicus blumi-canadensis, 292, 296, 298
Echinicus mauccii, 296
Famelobiotus, 254
ferns. See€Pterydophyta
phylogenetics, 236–37
index
fixation index (FST), 181, 288, 293
flagship taxa, 8, 61, 114, 251
flatworms See€Platyhelminthes
Flavocetraria cucullata, 179
Flavocetraria nivalis, 179
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation
Techniques (FISH), 47, 48, 49
Foraminifera, 63, 89
fossil record, 224, 253
fragmentation, 199, 217, 223, 224
Funaria, 267
fungi, 8, 18, 64, 112, 122, 130, 131, 132, 153,
177–81, 185–87, 191–202, 290, 318
agaric fungi, 179
microfungi, 62
postglacial dispersal, 341
postglacial range expansion, 199
Glaucoma, 64
Glaucoma scintillans, 63, 64
Gnathostomula, 260
Gnathostomula armata, 260
Gnathostomula paradoxa, 260
Gnathostomula peregrina, 260
gnathostomulid. See€Gnathostomulida
Gnathostomulida, 245, 255, 259, 260
Gondwana, 62, 81, 194, 218, 223, 224, 254, 265, 267
Grammitis azorica, 238
green algae, 89, 191, 192
Grifola frondosa, 179, 180, 190
Gyratrix hermaphroditus, 271
Galapagos Islands, 196, 214, 259
gastrotrich, See€Gastrotricha
Gastrotricha, 245–49, 291, 292
GenBank, 51, 179, 294
gene flow, 6, 8, 36, 38, 39, 124, 178, 179, 181, 186,
198, 199, 213, 224, 284, 288, 293, 325, 329, 331
genealogy, 181, 199, 294
generalist, 98, 99, 194
genetic diversity, 80, 106, 122, 178, 179, 185,
186, 187
genetic structure, 124, 149, 177, 178, 202, 288,
293, 294, 296, 298, 325
geographic structure, 199
phylogenetic structure, 185, 310
Geobacillus, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 51, 54, 55
Geobacillus caldoxylolyticus, 45
Geobacillus kaustophilus, 51
Geobacillus stearothermophilus, 45, 51
Geobacillus subterraneus, 51
Geobacillus thermocatenulatus, 51
Geobacillus thermodenitrificans, 51, 53, 54
Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius, 54
Geobacillus thermoleovorans, 45, 51
Geobacillus vulcani, 51
geobiology, 13–14, 17
geographic isolation, 12, 177, 214, 237
geographic barriers, 5, 318
geographic gradients, 9, 343
geological history, 8, 62
glacier, 102, 178, 193
glacial cycles, 186
glacial maxima, 186
glacial refugia, 186, 199, 222, 289, 341
glacial retreat, 124, 186
glaciations, 199, 222, 294, 318, 341
interglacial periods, 186
habitat
habitat area effect, 340
habitat limitation, 237
habitat preference, 325
habitat sorting, 341
habitat specialisation, 328
Haeckel, Ernst, 16
Halteria grandinella, 74–77
Hamatocaulis vernicosus, 222
Haplognathia, 260
Haplognathia rosea, 260
Haplognathia ruberrima, 260
Haplohexapodibius, 254
haploidy, 210
Herbertus, 223
Heterokontophyta, 192
Heterotardigrada, 253, 296
Heteroxenotrichula pygmaea, 248
historical biogeography, 6, 8, 12, 17, 39, 54, 98,
99, 100, 103, 179, 195, 224, 241, 267, 270, 285,
293, 298, 310, 344
historical colonisation events, 329, 331
historical dispersal, 318
historical limitation, 54, 177
Homalothecium, 224
Homalothecium sericeum, 222
Homarus americanus, 255, 256
Homarus gammarus, 255
homogenisation effect, 293
horizontal gene transfer, 290
hornworts. See€Anthocerotophyta
horsetail ferns. See€Pterydophyta
Hudson’s test statistics, 180, 181
Hyalospheniid, 115
Hydrodictyon, 81
Hypogymnia physodes, 195
361
362
index
Hypsibidae, 254
Hypsibius convergens, 254
Hypsibius dujardini, 254
indels, 180
infinite sites model, 180, 181
intergenic transcribed spacer (ITS), 88, 96, 98,
99, 102, 180
intergenic transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1), 62, 292
intergenic transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2), 292, 298
Ipomoea, 134
isolation by distance, 149, 288, 289, 293, 294,
298, 329, 330, 331
Isothecium, 222
Keratella, 251
Keratella americana, 80
keystone taxa, 186
kinorhynch. See€Kinorhyncha
Kinorhyncha, 245, 258, 259
Lactarius deliciosus, 179, 180
Lagenophrys cochinensis, 80
land bridge, 267
Large Subunit rDNA (LSU), 88, 143,
See€also€5.8S rDNA
latitudinal gradient, 115, 219, 248, 344
latitudinal zonation, 251
Laurasia, 62, 81, 225, 267
Lecane, 251
Lejeunaceae, 219
Leptogium furfuraceum, 200
Leptogium pseudofurfuraceum, 200
Leptoscyphus, 225
Leptoscyphus azoricus, 222
Leptoscyphus porphyrius, 222
leptosporangiate ferns. See€Pterydophyta
Letharia columbiana, 200
Letharia vulpina, 200
lichen, 8, 64, 179, 191–202, 210, 253, 264, 288
as habitat, 249, 252
tripartite lichen, 191
Lichenomphalia umbellifera, 179
light microscopy, 89
Limmenius, 254
Limnognathia maerski, 255
Lobaria hallii, 196
Lobaria pulmonaria, 195, 199
local adaptation, 289, 314, 318, 328, 329, 331, 333
Lopidium concinnum, 224
Loricifera, 245, 256–58
loriciferan, See€Loricifera
Macrobiotidae, 254
Macrobiotus harmsworthi, 254
Macrobiotus hufelandi, 254
Macrodasyida, 245, 247
macroecology, 311, 336, 340, 342, 344, 347, 348
Macrostomum, 271
Macroversum, 254
marattioid ferns, See€Pterydophyta
Marchantiophyta, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214,
219, 222, 223, 225, 288
Marchesinia brachiata, 223
Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), 180
Marsilea azorica, 238
Maryna umbrellata, 66, 68–71, 82
mass effects, 9, 325, 326
Melanelia tominii, 196
Meseres corlissi, 67, 74–77, 82
Mesostoma, 271
metacommunity, 325–28, 347, 348
Micarea, 193
Micrognathozoa, 245, 255
micrognathozoan. See€Micrognathozoa
microscopy, 97, 248, 249, 254
Mid-Cretaceous, 195
Mid-Pliocene, 199
migration estimates, 179
Milnesiidae, 254
Milnesioides, 254
Milnesium tardigradum, 254, 296
Minibiotus intermedius, 254
Minilentus, 254
moderate endemicity model, 5, 8, 61, 62, 81,
89, 339
molecular approach, 96, 285,
See€also€molecular, taxonomy
molecular divergence, 222, 224, 292
molecular evolution, 225, 292
mollusc. See€Mollusca
Mollusca, 318
Monhystera stagnalis, 265
monogonont rotifer, See€Rotifera
Mononchidae, 266
monopolisation, 328, 329, 330, 331
monopolisation hypothesis, 288
Monte Carlo simulations, 180
morphospecies, 12, 81, 82, 89, 97, 99, 100, 103,
112, 113–15, 116, 122, 124, 177, 178, 195, 201,
221, 222, 294
mosaic pattern of haplotype distribution, 329,
331
Multi-Locus Sequence Analysis (MLSA), 36, 39
Murryidae, 254
index
Musellifer, 248
mutualistic symbiosis, 191
mycobiont, 191, 192, 202
Myxozyma mucilagina, 148, 149, 150
natural environment, 13, 49
Nebela, 112
Necopinatidae, 254
Necopinatum, 254
Nematoda, 260–67, 270, 285, 288, 289, 290, 291,
292, 293, 294, 298
nematode, 245, See€Nematoda
Neodasys, 248
Nephrops norvegicus, 255
neutral model, 9, 325, 347
neutral theory, 348
niche, 5, 36, 37, 38, 40, 96, 98, 102, 140, 147, 153,
164, 187, 222, 310, 314, 315, 320, 329, 331,
341, 348
ecological niche, 5, 6, 179, 186, 314
fundamental niche, 159, 161, 314, 320
Grinnelian niche concept, 314
Hutchinsonian niche concept, 314
niche constraints, 9
realised niche, 159, 314, 320
nonparametric permutation test, 179, 180, 181
Nostoc, 192
Notholca, 251
Odontella sinensis, 80
Odontochlamys, 77–80
Oligocene, 223
Oligotrichea, 74–77
Opuntia, 132–65
Orthotrichum handiense, 215
Orthotrichum philibertii, 213
palaeontological record, 253
Pangaea, 217, 254
Paradiphascon, 254
Paramecium, 64
Paramecium aurelia, 63, 80, 95
Paramecium quadecaurelia, 80
Parmelia saxatilis, 200
Parmeliopsis ambigua, 196
Paroigolaimella bernensis, 262
Paroigolaimella coprophila, 263
parthenogenesis. See€reproduction
patch dynamics, 9, 325, 326
Peronotia, 25
Phaffomyces, 143–45
photobiont, i–202, 191–94, 201
phylogeny, 39, 100, 131, 201, 221, 222, 224, 236,
245, 338
phylogeography, 9, 124, 178, 194, 197–98,
222–25, 245, 284, 285, 293, 294, 298, 318–20,
327, 331, 344
phytoplankton, 81, 326, 339, 341
Pichia, 145–47
Pichia cactophila, 147
Plagiochila, 224
Plagiochilaceae, 223
Plagiostomum acoluthum, 271
plate tectonics, 16, 267, 318
Platismatia glauca, 195
Platyhelminthes, 268–71
Plectus, 263, 264, 265
Plectus antarcticus, 262
Pleistocene, 199, 200, 222, 294
Pleuretra hystrix, 251
Pliocene, 222, 253
Podophrya, 64
poikilohydric, 192
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), 5, 97
BOX-PCR, 38
primers, 37, 90, 96, 101
Real Time PCR, 37, 49, 96
Polypodium azoricum, 238
Polysporina, 193
Polystichum, 236
population structure, 164, 178, 186,
289, 293
Porella, 224
Porella canariensis, 224
Porella cordaeana, 224
Porella platyphylla, 224
Porella swartziana, 224
Porpidia flavicunda, 198
precursor stocking, 74, 77, 82
priority effect, 328, 329, 331
Prismatolaimus, 265
probabilistic calibration priors, 225
Problognathia, 259
Proechiniscus, 254
propagules, 8, 193, 194, 211, 249, 269, 288, 314,
337, 338, 340, 348
proportional overlap measures, 134
protist, 6, 7, 8, 11, 18, 61, 62, 74, 80, 81, 88, 89,
112, 113, 114, 115, 122, 124, 256, 284, 318,
326, 327, 328, 338, 339
dispersal, 66, 103
protozoa, See€protist
363
364
index
Pseudechiniscus suillus, 254
Pseudohexapodibius, 254
Pseudomonas, 38
Psuedomaryna australiensis, i–71
Pteridium aquilinum, 236
pteridophyte, See€Pterydophyta
Pterognathia, 260
Pterognathia ctenifera, 260
Pterydophyta, 8, 62, 64, 210, 211, 234–41, 288
Equisetopsida (horsetail ferns), 64, 234
Marattiopsida (marattioid ferns), 234
Polypodiopsida (leptosporangiate ferns), 234
Psilotopsida (whisk ferns), 234
pyrosequencing, 37
Pyrrhobryum mnioides, 223
Quaternary, 25, 186
quiescence, 210
Ramalina, 197
Random Amplification of Polymorphic DNA
(RAPD), 147, 148, 149, 150
range edge, 311
rare biosphere, 98, 136, 326, 328
Rastrognathia, 259
Rastrognathia macrostoma, 259
Ratugnathia, 259
Renauldia lycopodioides, 213
reproduction
asexual, 4, 36, 148, 149, 150, 152, 158, 164,
192, 193, 211, 247, 255, 290, 295, 296,
331
cyclical parthenogenesis, 249, 288
hermaphroditic, 247, 248, 269
obligate apomictic parthenogenesis, 247
obligate parthenogenesis, 249
parthenogenesis, 4, 248, 249, 253, 254, 255,
264, 265, 290, 331
sexual, 139, 141, 158, 163, 192, 197, 211, 215,
234, 249, 253, 254, 264, 290, 295, 296
vegetative propagation, 192, 193, 211
resting stages, 6, 80, 112, 249, 269, 270, 285,
See€also€dormancy 4
resting cyst, 8, 62, 63, 64, 66, 81, 82
cyst diversity, 62
in ciliates, 66
resting egg, 247, 248, 249, 251, 252, 255, 269,
288
Rhabditidae, 265
Rhabditophanes schneideri, 263
Rhabditophora, 268, 269
Rhizocarpon geographicum, 192
Roccellaceae, 201
rockhouse, 216
Rotaria, 100
rotifer. See€Rotifera
Rotifera, 80, 245, 249–52, 255, 262, 285, 286,
288, 289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 298, 318,
330, 340
Bdelloidea, 100, 249, 290, 339, 341, 342
Monogononta, 249, 251, 252, 288
Seisonidea, 249
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 158
Saccharomyces paradoxus, 158
Saccharomycotina, 131
sampling bias, 40, 270
sand trap, 262
Sandmanniella terricola, 71
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), 116,
122, 248
Schwendener, Simon, 191
Scorpidium cossonii, 222
Scorpidium scorpioides, 222
Scottnema lindsayae, 262
scout theory, 67
sculptured eggs, 255
Scytonema, 192
seisonid rotifer. See€Rotifera
serial colonisation, 325, 329
serial founder effect, 288, 293
site compatibility matrices, 180
slime fluxes, 159, 163, 165
Small Subunit rDNA (SSU), See€also€16S
rDNA,€18S rDNA88, 96, 97, 98, 99
Sorogena stoianovitchae, i–73
source-sink dynamics, 314, 325
spatial patterns, 6, 8, 9, 11, 37, 39, 250, 285, 298
spatio-temporal scaling, 39, 40
specialist, 113, 237, 327
speciation, 5, 177, 197, 222, 224, 310, 320, 330
allopatric speciation, 12, 213, 214, 348
sympatric speciation, 348
species complex, 252, 254, 256, 258, 260, 265,
271, 292, 296, 328. See€also€cryptic species 5,
80, 139, 140, 185, 200, 222
species concept, 7, 8, 36, 201, 221, 343
ecological species concept, 36
evolutionary species concept, 36
phylogenetic species concept, 36
species delimitation, 221, 292, 296
species pool, 236, 341, 342, 346, 348
index
species richness, 37, 38, 161, 178, 194, 219, 220,
263, 340, 342, 348, 349
species sorting, 9, 325, 326
species–area relationship, 220
Sphaeropteris cooperi, 239
Sphagnum, 210
Sphagnum magellanicum, 121
sporangium, 210, 211
spores, 8, 45, 62, 64, 131, 132, 148, 158, 178, 186,
193, 211, 213, 215, 216, 224, 235, 239, 337
haploid spores, 234
meiospores, 211
Starmera, 141–45
Starmera caribaea, 153
stem necrosis, 134, 136
stenoevolution, 224
stepping-stone migration, 9, 198, 213, 225, 226,
238, 289
stochasticity, 341
stomatocyst. See€resting cyst
Strombidium oculatum, 77, 82
succulent cacti, 133
Surtsey, 193
Symbion americanus, 255, 256
Symbion pandora, 255
symbiont, 8, 199
sympatric speciation, See€speciation
Tardigrada, 245, 262, 285, 288, 289, 290, 291,
292, 293, 295–99, 340, 341, 345
tardigrade, See€Tardigrada
taxonomic unit, 5, 96, 100, 221, 340
in protists, 90–96, 100
Operational Taxonomic Units (OTU), 51, 89,
101, 343
taxonomy
DNA taxonomy, 291–92, 296
molecular taxonomy, 5, 9, 36, 122, 291, 292,
294–95
morphological taxonomy, 5, 7
Teratocephalus, 263, 265
Terminal Restriction Fragment Length
Polymorphism (TRFLP), 37
Tertiary, 222
Tetracyclus, 22, 23, 24
Tetrahymena, 64
Tetrahymena pyriformis, 63, 64, 80
Thamnobryum, 222
Thermozodium, 253
Tobrilus, 265
Tobrilus elephas, 265
tolerance, 54, 320
desiccation, 71, 210
drought, 202
stress, 55, 102, 132, 192, 194
temperature, 202
tracheophyte, 210
transitions, 180
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), 45
transversions, 180
Trapeliopsis glaucolepidea, 179, 180, 199
Trebouxia, 192, 193, 201, 202
Trebouxia impressa, 201
Trebouxia jamesii, 201
Trentepohlia, 192, 201, 202
Trentepohliales, 201
Trichocerca, 251
Tripyla glomerans, 266
Triquetrella mxinwana, 222
turbellarian, 268, 269, 270
microturbellaria, 268–71
Tylenchomorpha, 262, 263, 266
Tylenchus, 263, 265
Tyleptus, 267
Typhloplanidae, 271
ubiquity hypothesis, 4, 5, 12
ultrasequencing, 5, 6
Ureibacillus, 51
Ureibacillus thermosphericus, 53
Urodasys viviparus, 248
Vaccinium uliginosum, 186
Valvognathia, 259
Vandiemenia ratkowskiana, 213
Varicellaria rhodocarpa, 193
Verrucaria maura, 196
Vezdaea aestivalis, 193
vicariance hypothesis, 200
Wallace, Alfred Russel, 15, 17
whisk ferns. See€Pterydophyta
Xanthoria elegans, 192
Xanthoria parietina, 193
Xenotrichula intermedia, 248, 249
Xenotrichula lineata, 248
Xenotrichula paralineata, 248
yeast, 7, 8, 130–65
zooplankton, 80, 285, 326, 327, 328
365
Systematics Association Publications
1. Bibliography of Key Works for the Identification of the British Fauna and Flora, 3rd
edition (1967)†
Edited by G.J. Kerrich, R.D. Meikie and N. Tebble
2. Function and Taxonomic Importance (1959)†
Edited by A.J. Cain
3. The Species Concept in Palaeontology (1956)†
Edited by P.C. Sylvester-Bradley
4. Taxonomy and Geography (1962)†
Edited by D. Nichols
5. Speciation in the Sea (1963)†
Edited by J.P. Harding and N. Tebble
6. Phenetic and Phylogenetic Classification (1964)†
Edited by V.H. Heywood and J. McNeill
7. Aspects of Tethyan Biogeography (1967)†
Edited by C.G. Adams and D.V. Ager
8. The Soil Ecosystem (1969)†
Edited by H. Sheals
9. Organisms and Continents through Time (1973)*
Edited by N.F. Hughes
10. Cladistics:€A Practical Course in Systematics (1992)‡
P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries, I.J. Kitching, R.W. Scotland, D.J. Siebert and
D.M. Williams
11. Cladistics:€The Theory and Practice of Parsimony Analysis (2nd edition) (1998)‡
I.J. Kitching, P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries and D.M. Williams
†
*
‡
Published by the Systematics Association (out of print).
Published by the Palaeontological Association in conjunction with the Systematics Association.
Published by Oxford University Press for the Systematics Association.
Systematics Association Special Volumes
1. The New Systematics (1940)a
Edited by J.S. Huxley (reprinted 1971)
2. Chemotaxonomy and Serotaxonomy (1968)*
Edited by J.C. Hawkes
3. Data Processing in Biology and Geology (1971)*
Edited by J.L. Cutbill
4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (1971)*
Edited by V.H. Heywood
5. Taxonomy and Ecology (1973)*
Edited by V.H. Heywood
6. The Changing Flora and Fauna of Britain (1974)*
Edited by D.L. Hawksworth
7. Biological Identification with Computers (1975)*
Edited by R.J. Pankhurst
8. Lichenology:€Progress and Problems (1976)*
Edited by D.H. Brown, D.L. Hawksworth and R.H. Bailey
9. Key Works to the Fauna and Flora of the British Isles and Northwestern Europe, 4th
edition (1978)*
Edited by G.J. Kerrich, D.L. Hawksworth and R.W. Sims
10. Modern Approaches to the Taxonomy of Red and Brown Algae (1978)*
Edited by D.E.G. Irvine and J.H. Price
11. Biology and Systematics of Colonial Organisms (1979)*
Edited by C. Larwood and B.R. Rosen
12. The Origin of Major Invertebrate Groups (1979)*
Edited by M.R. House
13. Advances in Bryozoology (1979)*
Edited by G.P. Larwood and M.B. Abbott
14. Bryophyte Systematics (1979)*
Edited by G.C.S. Clarke and J.G. Duckett
15. The Terrestrial Environment and the Origin of Land Vertebrates (1980)*
Edited by A.L. Panchen
16 Chemosystematics:€Principles and Practice (1980)*
Edited by F.A. Bisby, J.G. Vaughan and C.A. Wright
17. The Shore Environment:€Methods and Ecosystems (2 volumes) (1980)*
Edited by J.H. Price, D.E.C. Irvine and W.F. Farnham
18. The Ammonoidea (1981)*
Edited by M.R. House and J.R. Senior
19. Biosystematics of Social Insects (1981)*
Edited by P.E. House and J.-L. Clement
20. Genome Evolution (1982)*
Edited by G.A. Dover and R.B. Flavell
21. Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction (1982)*
Edited by K.A. Joysey and A.E. Friday
22. Concepts in Nematode Systematics (1983)*
Edited by A.R. Stone, H.M. Platt and L.F. Khalil
23. Evolution, Time and Space:€The Emergence of the Biosphere (1983)*
Edited by R.W. Sims, J.H. Price and P.E.S. Whalley
24. Protein Polymorphism:€Adaptive and Taxonomic Significance (1983)*
Edited by G.S. Oxford and D. Rollinson
25. Current Concepts in Plant Taxonomy (1983)*
Edited by V.H. Heywood and D.M. Moore
26. Databases in Systematics (1984)*
Edited by R. Allkin and F.A. Bisby
27. Systematics of the Green Algae (1984)*
Edited by D.E.G. Irvine and D.M. John
28. The Origins and Relationships of Lower Invertebrates (1985)‡
Edited by S. Conway Morris, J.D. George, R. Gibson and H.M. Platt
29. Infraspecific Classification of Wild and Cultivated Plants (1986)‡
Edited by B.T. Styles
30. Biomineralization in Lower Plants and Animals (1986)‡
Edited by B.S.C. Leadbeater and R. Riding
31. Systematic and Taxonomic Approaches in Palaeobotany (1986)‡
Edited by R.A. Spicer and B.A. Thomas
32. Coevolution and Systematics (1986)‡
Edited by A.R. Stone and D.L. Hawksworth
33. Key Works to the Fauna and Flora of the British Isles and Northwestern Europe, 5th
edition (1988)‡
Edited by R.W. Sims, P. Freeman and D.L. Hawksworth
34. Extinction and Survival in the Fossil Record (1988)‡
Edited by G.P. Larwood
35. The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods (2 volumes) (1988)‡
Edited by M.J. Benton
36. Prospects in Systematics (1988)‡
Edited by J.L. Hawksworth
37. Biosystematics of Haematophagous Insects (1988)‡
Edited by M.W. Service
38. The Chromophyte Algae:€Problems and Perspective (1989)‡
Edited by J.C. Green, B.S.C. Leadbeater and W.L. Diver
39. Electrophoretic Studies on Agricultural Pests (1989)‡
Edited by H.D. Loxdale and J. den Hollander
40. Evolution, Systematics, and Fossil History of the Hamamelidae (2 volumes) (1989)‡
Edited by P.R. Crane and S. Blackmore
41. Scanning Electron Microscopy in Taxonomy and Functional Morphology (1990)‡
Edited by D. Claugher
42. Major Evolutionary Radiations (1990)‡
Edited by P.D. Taylor and G.P. Larwood
43. Tropical Lichens:€Their Systematics, Conservation and Ecology (1991)‡
Edited by G.J. Galloway
44. Pollen and Spores:€Patterns and Diversifiction (1991)‡
Edited by S. Blackmore and S.H. Barnes
45. The Biology of Free-Living Heterotrophic Flagellates (1991)‡
Edited by D.J. Patterson and J. Larsen
46. Plant–Animal Interactions in the Marine Benthos (1992)‡
Edited by D.M. John, S.J. Hawkins and J.H. Price
47. The Ammonoidea:€Environment, Ecology and Evolutionary Change (1993)‡
Edited by M.R. House
48. Designs for a Global Plant Species Information System (1993)‡
Edited by F.A. Bisby, G.F. Russell and R.J. Pankhurst
49. Plant Galls:€Organisms, Interactions, Populations (1994)‡
Edited by M.A.J. Williams
50. Systematics and Conservation Evaluation (1994)‡
Edited by P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries and R.I. Vane-Wright
51. The Haptophyte Algae (1994)‡
Edited by J.C. Green and B.S.C. Leadbeater
52. Models in Phylogeny Reconstruction (1994)‡
Edited by R. Scotland, D.I. Siebert and D.M. Williams
53. The Ecology of Agricultural Pests:€Biochemical Approaches (1996)**
Edited by W.O.C. Symondson and J.E. Liddell
54. Species:€the Units of Diversity (1997)**
Edited by M.F. Claridge, H.A. Dawah and M.R. Wilson
55. Arthropod Relationships (1998)**
Edited by R.A. Fortey and R.H. Thomas
56. Evolutionary Relationships among Protozoa (1998)**
Edited by G.H. Coombs, K. Vickerman, M.A. Sleigh and A. Warren
57. Molecular Systematics and Plant Evolution (1999)‡‡
Edited by P.M. Hollingsworth, R.M. Bateman and R.J. Gornall
58. Homology and Systematics (2000)‡‡
Edited by R. Scotland and R.T. Pennington
59. The Flagellates:€Unity, Diversity and Evolution (2000)‡‡
Edited by B.S.C. Leadbeater and J.C. Green
60. Interrelationships of the Platyhelminthes (2001)‡‡
Edited by D.T.J. Littlewood and R.A. Bray
61. Major Events in Early Vertebrate Evolution (2001)‡‡
Edited by P.E. Ahlberg
62. The Changing Wildlife of Great Britain and Ireland (2001)‡‡
Edited by D.L. Hawksworth
63. Brachiopods Past and Present (2001)‡‡
Edited by H. Brunton, L.R.M. Cocks and S.L. Long
64. Morphology, Shape and Phylogeny (2002)‡‡
Edited by N. MacLeod and P.L. Forey
65. Developmental Genetics and Plant Evolution (2002)‡‡
Edited by Q.C.B. Cronk, R.M. Bateman and J.A. Hawkins
66. Telling the Evolutionary Time:€Molecular Clocks and the Fossil Record (2003)‡‡
Edited by P.C.J. Donoghue and M.P. Smith
67. Milestones in Systematics (2004)‡‡
Edited by D.M. Williams and P.L. Forey
68. Organelles, Genomes and Eukaryote Phylogeny (2004)‡‡
Edited by R.P. Hirt and D.S. Horner
69. Neotropical Savannas and Seasonally Dry Forests:€Plant Diversity, Biogeography and
Conservation (2006)‡‡
Edited by R.T. Pennington, G.P. Lewis and J.A. Rattan
70. Biogeography in a Changing World (2006)‡‡
Edited by M.C. Ebach and R.S. Tangney
71. Pleurocarpous Mosses:€Systematics & Evolution (2006)‡‡
Edited by A.E. Newton and R.S. Tangney
72. Reconstructing the Tree of Life:€Taxonomy and Systematics of Species Rich Taxa
(2006)‡‡
Edited by T.R. Hodkinson and J.A.N. Parnell
73. Biodiversity Databases:€Techniques, Politics, and Applications (2007)‡‡
Edited by G.B. Curry and C.J. Humphries
74. Automated Taxon Identification in Systematics:€Theory, Approaches and Applications
(2007)‡‡
Edited by N. MacLeod
75. Unravelling the algae:€the past, present, and future of algal systematics (2008)‡‡
Edited by J. Brodie and J. Lewis
76. The New Taxonomy (2008)‡‡
Edited by Q.D. Wheeler
77. Palaeogeography and Palaeobiogeography:€Biodiversity in Space and Time (in
press)‡‡
Edited by P. Upchurch, A. McGowan and C. Slater
Published
Published
‡
Published
**
Published
‡‡
Published
a
*
by
by
by
by
by
Clarendon Press for the Systematics Association.
Academic Press for the Systematics Association.
Oxford University Press for the Systematics Association.
Chapman & Hall for the Systematics Association.
CRC Press for the Systematics Association.
Fig 4.3 Bacterial cell using a Geobacillus (GEOB) probe in T80 spiked microcosm at
46 °C (A) and 60 °C (B).
Fig 11.1 Orthotrichum handiense:€appearance of the plant.
A
B
C
Fig 12.2 Endemic ferns of the Azores:€(A) Grammitis azorica; (B) Polypodium azoricum; (C)
Marsilea azorica (all photos by H. Schaefer).
A
B
C
Fig 12.4 Invasive ferns of the Azores:€(A) Deparia petersenii; (B) Sphaeropteris cooperi; (C)
Cyrtomium falcatum (all photos by H. Schaefer).
Fig 13.6 Two microturbellarians from India, December 2008. (A) Trigonostomum franki
(marine) and (B) a new species of Dalyelliidae (freshwater). Scale bars 0.1â•›m m.