Rudist bivalves in Jamaica: from Barrett and Sawkins to Chubb
Simon F. Mitchell and Sherene James-Williamson
Department of Geography and Geology, The University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston 7, Jamaica.
The Discovery of Rudists in Jamaica
Rudist bivalves were discovered in Jamaica early
during the First Geological Survey, a survey
commissioned by the Colonial Government in Jamaica
and the Home Government in London that was
undertaken to determine the economic mineral
resources of the island. The director of the survey, Mr.
Lucas Barrett, and his assisitant, James Gay Sawkins,
began their survey in St. Thomas in the East (now the
Parish of St. Thomas), and in the banks of the Plantain
Garden River, some 3 miles west of Bath, they
discovered several thin limestones that contained
specimens of Cretaceous fossils included hippurites (not
Barrettia, as is often stated, but rudists sensu lato, since
the a e hippu ites as at that ti e used fo
ost
rudists), Inoceramus and Nerinaea, and demonstrated
that these rocks were of Cretaceous age (Barrett, 1860).
The founder of Jamaican Geology, Sir Henry De la
Beche, had formerly mapped the area and had included
the rocks in which the rudists were found as the
Transition Series which was then attributed to the
Palaeozoic (De la Beche, 1827); but even De la Beche
(1830) whould admit that this age was based on gross
mineralogy and had little value. Yet the notice published
in the Quaterly Journal of the Geological Society by
da ett as ot the fi st fossil e o d that De la de he s
suggestions of age were wrong, for James Gay Sawkins
had reported a Cretaceous coral (Caryophyllia centralis)
in rocks below the so-called Coal Measures several
years before (Sawkins, 1856).
After mapping St. Thomas in the East, Barrett and
Sawkins split up – Sawkins would survey the eastern
part of the parish of Portland, whilst Barrett would
survey the western part of the same parish. It was
Barrett, whilst exploring the western area of the Back
River (Back Rio Grande) who discovered a limestone in
January 1861 with the remarkable fossil that once
transported back to England, and investigated by S. P.
Woodward (1862; Figure 1), would be described as
Barrettia monilifera (the generic name Barrettia was
taken from Barrett, although apparently much to his
dislike: Annonymous, 1863).
Barrett died at the end of 1862 in a diving accident
and Sawkins was promoted to Director of the Survey.
The Director of the Geological Survey for the survey of
Trinidad which was undertaken before that of Jamaica,
George Parks Wall, was in Jamaica (probably involved
with the Jamaican copper mining companies), and was
temporarily employed in the position of Assistant
Geologist. Wall had made extensive collections of corals
(Duncan and Wall, 1865) and rudists (Chubb, 1980) in
Clarendon, and upon leaving Jamaica he took these
specimens back to London where they were lodged in
the British Museum. Sawkins, together with his
assistants – George Parks Wall, Arthur Lennox, and
Charles Barrington Brown – were also to make
collections of fossils including rudists, but lack of
resources in the colony of Jamaica and/or from the
Colonial Office in London meant that none of these
specimens was ever sent to London (Sawkins and
Brown, 1867). These specimens, which were
subsequently referred to as the Sawkins and Brown
collection , were used to establish a Geological Museum
in Spanish Town in 1866 or 1867, and in 1879, with
other collections, went to form the nucleus of the
Institue of Jamaica (Kaplan, 1996).
Figure 1. The original cross-section of Barrettia monilifera
Woodward (1862, plate II, fig. 5). This section (which can no
longer be traced) shows the two pillars, the posterior
myophore fitting into a socket, and the two teeth fitting into
slots. Mitchell (2010, fig. 6B) illustrated an almost identical
specimen from the type locality.
1
Figure 2. Charles Taylor Trechmann (1885-1964) from a
photograph in the University of the West Indies Geology
Museum (date unknown). Trechmann collected and
described the rudists of Jamaica and produced two
important papers in 1922 and 1924.
New Rudist Localities: Logie Green and Green Island
Follo i g the “a ki s su e , udist i al es ould
receive virtually no interest in Jamaica for the next 30
years. The construction of roads in the late 1890s, cut
through some of the Cretaceous limestones, and rudist
specimens found their way to the Institute of Jamaica,
where the curator, Mr. Duerden, who had geological
experience, recognized their importance (The Gleaner,
th
29 January 1898). Mr. F. Nicholas, from New York, now
made collections of the rudists form the Cretaceous
rocks (specifically Logie Green, in Clarendon, and
Orange Cove, in Hanover).
Not being familiar with rudists, Nicholas forwarded his
material to the American Museum of Natural History in New
York, where R. P. Whitfield, the curator, was to work on this
material. Whitfield (1897a) described a whole range of
rudists: the huge barrel-shaped specimens of Durania, the
coiled caprinids, and the small Radiolites. But it was with
Barrettia that Whitfield had his greatest problem – he did
not think it was a rudist but believed it to be a coral
(Whitfield, 1897b). The leading expert on rudists at the time,
H. Douvillé (1898), ote a sho t e ie of Whitfield s o k,
stating that Barrettia was a rudist, and bemoaning the fact
that no sections were given of the other forms.
Gentlemen Geologists
Another twenty years, or so, would ellapse, during
which the Great War saw major loss of life and
devastation in Europe, until the next investigations of
Jamaican rudists would begin. Charles Taylor Trechmann
(Figure 2) was an independently weathly Englishman; his
o e had o e f o his fathe s e e t o pa
(Donovan, 2010). He spent his summers in England but
would travel during the cold winter months. His first trips,
associated with the British Society for the Advancement
of Science, were to Australia and New Zealand (Evening
th
Post [New Zealand], 13 November 1914). But in 1921,
he began regular visits to the West Indies – Trinidad,
Barbados and Jamaica; but it was with Jamaica that
rudists, as well as other fossils, became important and
eventually the geology too. Each trip would see him
collecting different areas, or returning to areas that had
previously proved productive. Trechmann was a fossil
man, and above all he used his fossils to date the rocks:
De la Beche had promoted general rock types, Barrett
and Sawkins had assigned periods, but it was Trechmann
who used Jamaican fossils to try and place Jamaican rock
units within European stages. In 1921 he returned to
Orange Cove in Hanover to look for Barrettia, but not
finding it he found a local man who had seen F. C.
Nicholas collecting there 25 years before – the Barrettia
location was at Haughton Hall not Orange Cove! His
paper redescribing Barrettia (Trechmann, 1922) was
published the following year. In 1923, he collected
extensive material from Logie Green – ost of Whitfield s
described species – but a whole lot more (F. C. Ni holas
collections in the American Museum of Natural History
contain specimens of all these species, but none were
described); now Trechmann describes such distinctive
forms as: Biradiolites rudissimus, Biradiolites jamaicensis
and Coralliochama radiolitiformis. Trechmann also had
travelled extensively through France, Austria and Persia;
and the knowledge he had gained of European rudists
allowed him to recognize that various Jamaican forms
were highly distinctive – in 1924 he named
Titanosarcolies, Antillocaprina, and Praebarrettia. In
1924, Charles Aldred Matley arrived in Jamaica to begin
the Second Government Geological Survey – this time it
was for water rather than for mineral resources. Sawkins
(1869) had recorded a mineral sp i g i “t. A s G eat
River and so Matley now studied this spring. In doing so,
he discovered that it was seeping methane and
suggested the presence of petroleum underneath.
Although Matle s su e as to be short-lived, he made
a rapid investigation of the Cretaceous rocks in St. Ann
before he left Jamaica; here he found a Cretaceous
limestone
from
which
Trechmann
identified
Maastrichtian rudists.
2
Figure 3. Lawrence John Chubb, reproduced from the Journal
of the Geological Society, volume 13, photograph facing p. 2.
The Third Geologi al Sur ey a d Chu ’s Rudists
The Second World War would intervene before the
resumption of studies on rudist bivalves. Professor
Verners A. Zans was selected to head the new
Geological Survey and arrived in Jamaica in October of
th
1949. On the 10 of January 1950, Dr. Lawrence John
Chubb (Figure 3), aged 62, and his wife arrived in
Jamaica on Sabbatical leave from University College
London, with thoughts of retirement i Ja ai a s
th
pleasant climate (Robinson, 1973; The Gleaner, 11
January 1950). This was not to be, and later that same
year he was appointed as Geologist in the new
Geological Survey.
Chubb now took on the task of trying to make sense
of the Jamaican Cretaceous with its limestones full of
rudists. He began by studying specimens preserved in
the useu at the I stitute of Ja ai a, Whitfield s t pe
specimens preserved in the American Museum of
Natural History, the Matley and Stephenson Collections
at the United States National Museum, and the Barrett,
Trechmann and Woodward Collections in the British
Museum of Natural History (Chubb, 1955a). As mapping
of Jamaica progressed, collections of fossils were also
made by the mapping geologists and worked on by
Chubb. Chubb s first paper on rudists was a revision of
Whitfield s Jamaican species (Chubb, 1955a). Following
this, he described a range of rare or unusual specimens
from Jamaica (Chubb, 1956a, b) and extended his ideas
to other Caribbean islands (Chubb, 1956c).
Chubb also brought to Jamaica his knowledge of
the Geologists Association and of publicizing
geology. In 1955, Chubb, together with other Survey
geologists, other professional geologists, and various
interested amateurs, formed the Jamaica Group of
the Geologists Association. The augural meeting was
th
held on Friday the 7 of October, and Lawrence
Chubb was elected the first Chairman (The Gleaner,
th
10 October 1955).
The International Geological Congress was held in
Mexico in September 1956, and this provided Chubb
with an opportunity to visit Mexico. Following the
Congress, Chubb examined the succession in Chiapas
where he made rudist collections and redescribed the
succession (Chubb, 1959). In 1957 Chubb became
Deputy Director of the Geological Survey.
Because of his knowledge of rudists, Chubb also
received collections of specimens from geologists
working elsewhere in the Caribbean. Peter H. Matson
was mapping south-western Puerto Rico, and sent his
material to Chubb for identification. Chu s
identifications were critical for assigning ages to the
rocks of Puerto Rico, although too few rudists were sent
to Jamaica to accurately assign ages to all of the
limestone units. From St. Croix, Chubb received rudists
from the Judith Fancy Formation collected by John T.
Whetten; this was an interesting assemblage for Chubb,
Barrettia with Titanosarcolites occurring together! This
was something that he had argued with Trechmann
about many times, Chubb maintained that Barrettia and
Titanosarcolites had separate ranges indicating the
Campanian and Maastrichtian, repectively; whereas
Trechmann reported that he had found them together
in the Stapleton Limestone in the Sunderland Inlier of
western Jamaica (Chubb, 1955b; Trechmann, 1960).
Chu s o
e t i luded i Whette s thesis as that
the occurrence of Barrettia and Titanosarcolites
togethe
ight i di ate a se ies of passage eds
between the Campanian and Maastrichtian. But in
Chubb s op of Whette s (1961) thesis he wrote
Whe I rote this I did not realize that the fossils came
from a conglomerate and were therefore probably
re orked.
At the Annual General Meeting of the Jamaica Group of
the Geologists Asso iatio i
, it as de ided to eak
the li k ith the Geologists Asso iatio ‘obinson, 1980).
At the start of 1860, the Geological Society of Jamaica was
born, with a new constitution, and Lawrence Chubb as the
first president. The following year, Chubb resigned as
president at the age of 73.
3
Following the sudden death of Verners Zans from a
th
heart attack on the 5 of September, 1961, Chubb was
promoted to the position of acting Director of the
Geological Survey (Chubb and Williams, 1961). In 1963,
Lawrence Chubb retired from the Geological Survey and
became a Research Associate in the newly formed
Department of Geology at the University of the West
Indies. But the following year his wife died and he
returned to England. His return to England was not
what he expected, and he decided he liked Jamaica. He
returned to Jamaica and became an Honouray
Consultant in the Department of Geology at the
University. It was here that he worked on his
monograph of Jamaican rudists, but work was slow.
By 1967, new work was progressing on the
Cretaceous of Jamaica. Henry Mac Gillavry, who had
published on the Cuban rudists in 1937, had a new set
of students (H. van Dommelen and Jan Krijnen) working
in the Caribbean. The group visited Jamaica in 1967
he e the
et ith Chu . Chu s o og aph as
still not complete, and so he submitted brief
descriptions of the new species to the Journal of the
Geological Society of Jamaica – the article was
published in 1968 (Jung, 1970).
Th ee o e ea s e e to pass efo e fi all Chu s
monograph Rudists of Jamaica would appear in print
th
(Figure 4). Its date of publication is given as the 17 of
September, 1971, and in it he describes 71 species from
Jamaica. Two other important monographs on
Caribbean rudists also appeared the same year: Gloria
Alencáster de Cse a s Rudistas del cretacico superior
de Chiapas, and H. van Dommelen s Ontogenetic,
phylogenetic and taxonomic studies of the American
species of Pseudovaccinities and of Torreites and the
multiple-fold Hippuritids.
th
Lawrence Chubb died on the 12 of October, 1971,
less than a month after the publication of his
monograph. There is no copy of his monograph in the
Lawrence Chubb Papers in the West Indies Collection of
the University of the West Indies Science Library, nor,
for that matter are there copies of the other two works
published the same year (Donovan, 1988). Lawrence
Chubb lived to see his work published, but probably
never saw a copy of the final printed version.
Figure 4. Cover of Chubb s monograph Rudists of
Jamaica published on the 17th of Spetember 1971;
Chubb died on the 12th of October 1971 less than a
month after its publication.
Annonymous. 1863. The Popular Science Review, 2 (1863),
Robert Hardwicke, London, pp. 428-431.
Barrett, L. 1860. On some Cretaceous Rocks in the SouthEastern Portion of Jamaica. Quarterly journal of the
Geological Society of London, 16, 324-326.
Chubb, L.J. 1955a. A revision of Whitfield's type specimens
of the rudist mollusks from the Cretaceous of Jamaica, B.
W. I. American Museum Novitates, No. 1713, 1-15.
Chubb, L.J. 1955b. The Cretaceous succession in Jamaica.
Geological Magazine, 92, 177-195.
Chubb, L.J. 1956a. Thyrastylon, a new rudist genus from
the Upper Cretaceous of Guatemala, the Antilles, and
Persia, with a discussion of the function of rudist oscules
and pillars. Palaeontographica Americana, 4, No. 27, 3349.
Acknowledgements. We thank Richard Coutou for reviewing
this manuscript and making valuable suggestions for Chubb, L.J. 1956b. Two rare rudists from Jamaica, B. W. I.
Palaeontographica Americana, 4, 1-30.
improvements.
Chubb, L.J. 1956c. Rudist assemblages of the Antillean
Upper Cretaceous. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 37,
References
5-31.
Alencàster, G. 1971. Rudistas del Cretácico superior de Chubb, L.J. 1959. Upper Cretaceous of central Chiapas,
Chiapas, parte I. Paleontología mexicana, 34, 1 91.
Mexico. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum
4
Geologists, 43, 725-756.
Chubb, L.J. 1968 (dated 1967). New rudist species from
the Cretaceous rocks of Jamaica. Journal of the Geological
Society of Jamaica, 9, 24-31.
Chubb, L.J. 1980. The Wall collection of Jamaican
Cretaceous Mollusca in the British Museum (Natural
History). Journal of the Geological Society of Jamaica, 19,
52-53.
Chubb, L.J. 1971. Rudists of Jamaica. Palaeontographica
Americana, 7, 161-257.
Chubb, L.J. and Williams J.B. 1961. Zans memorial issue.
Geonotes, 4(3-4), 1-39.
De la Beche, H.T. 1827. Remarks on the geology of
Jamaica. Transactions of the Geological Society of London,
Ser. 2, v. 2, 143–194.
De la Beche, H.T. 1830. Sections & views, illustrative of
geological phaenomena, 71 pp., 40 pls., Treuttel & Ẅrtz,
London.
Donovan, S.K. 1988. A catalogue of L. J. Chubb's collection
of rudist bivalve papers. Journal of the Geological Society
of Jamaica, 24, 8-14.
Donovan, S.K. 2010. Three points of view: Wendell P.
Woodring (1891-1983), Charles A. Matley (1866-1947),
Charles T. Trechmann (1884-1964), and Jamaican geology
in the 1920s and 1930s. In: Donovan, S.K. (Ed.), Jamaican
rock stars, 1823-1971: the geologists who explored Jamaica,
Geological Society of America Memoir 205, 59-78.
Douvillé, M. H. 1898. Les Rudistes de la Jamaïque, par R. P.
Whitfield. Revue Critique Paleozoologie, II, 122-125,
Paris.
Duncan, M.B. and Wall, G.P. 1865. A notice of the geology
of Jamaica, especially with reference to the district of
Clarendon; with descriptions of the Cretaceous, Eocene,
and Miocene corals of the islands. Quarterly Journal of the
Geological Society of London, 21, 1-15.
Jung, P. 1970. Torreites sanchezi (Douvillé) from Jamaica.
Palaeontographica Americana, 7, 1-13.
Kaplan, F.E.S. 1996. Museums and the making of
"ourselves": the role of objects in national identity, 430 pp.,
Leicester University Press.
Mac Gillavry, H.J. 1937. Geology of the Province of
Camaguey, Cuba with revisional studies in rudist
paleontology (mainly based upon collections from Cuba).
Geographische en Geologische Mededeelingen, Utrecht 14,
1-168.
Matson, P.H. 1960. Geology of the Mayagüez area, Puerto
Rico. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 71, 319-362.
Mitchell, S.F. 2010. Revision of three large species of
Barrettia from Jamaica. Caribbean Journal of Earth
Science, 41, 1-16.
Robinson, E. 1973. Lawrence John Chubb, D.Sc., Ph.D.,
F.G.S. Journal of the Geological Society of Jamaica, 13, 1-5.
Robinson, E. 1980. The Geological Society of Jamaica – its
history. Journal of the Geological Society of Jamaica, 19,
54-58.
Sawkins, J.G. 1856. Report. To the directors of the Rio
Grande Mining Company. The Transactions of the Jamaica
Society of Arts, 1, 41.
Sawkins, J.G. 1869. Reports on the geology of Jamaica; or,
Part II of the West Indian Survey, Memoirs of the
Geological Survey, 339 pp., Longmans, Green & Co.,
London.
Sawkins J.G. and Brown, C.B. 1867. Letter to Grant, dated
25th April 1867, Enclosed with letter to Murchison dated
13th June 1867, Murchison Letters, 1865-1867, British
Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham.
Trechmann, C.T. 1922. The Barrettia beds of Jamaica.
Geological Magazine, 59, 501-514, London.
Trechmann, C.T. 1924. The Cretaceous limestones of
Jamaica and their Mollusca. Geological Magazine, 61, 25410.
Trechmann, C.T. 1960. What I think of the 1958
Geological Survey Map of Jamaica. Geonotes, 3, 111-113.
van Dommelen, H. 1971. Ontogenetic, phylogenetic and
taxonomic studies on the American species of
Pseudovaccinites and of Torreites, and the multiple-fold
hippuritids. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam, 125
pp.
Whetten, J.T. 1961. Geology of St. Croix U.S. Virgin Islands.
Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University, New
Jersey, 102 pp.
Whitfield, R.P. 1897a. Observations on the genus Barrettia
Woodward, with descriptions of two new species.
Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 9,
233-246, New York, N.Y.
Whitfield, R.P. 1897b. Descriptions of species of Rudistae
from the Cretaceous rocks of Jamaica. Bulletin of the
American Museum of Natural History, 9, 185-196, New
York, N.Y.
Woodward, S.P. 1862. Some account of Barrettia, a new
and remarkable fossil shell from the hippurite limestone
of Jamaica. The Geologist: a Popular Illustrated Monthly
Magazine of Geology, V (October 1862), 372-377, pl. XXXXI, London.
Mitchell, S.F., and James-Williamson, S. 2011. Rudist bivalves in Jamaica: from Barrett and Sawkins to Chubb. In
S.F. Mitchell (Ed.), The Ninth International Congress on Rudist Bivalves 18th to 25th June 2011, Kingston, Jamaica,
Abstracts, Articles and Field Guides. UWI Mona Contributions to Geology #6, 1-5.
5