Historical Biology
An International Journal of Paleobiology
ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ghbi20
Late Oligocene leaf and pollen flora of
Southwestern Siberia: taxonomy, biogeography
and palaeoenvironments
Thomas Denk , Johannes Martin Bouchal , Pavel Smirnov & Yaroslav Trubin
To cite this article: Thomas Denk , Johannes Martin Bouchal , Pavel Smirnov & Yaroslav Trubin
(2020): Late Oligocene leaf and pollen flora of Southwestern Siberia: taxonomy, biogeography and
palaeoenvironments, Historical Biology
To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2020.1839064
View supplementary material
Published online: 11 Dec 2020.
Submit your article to this journal
View related articles
View Crossmark data
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ghbi20
HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2020.1839064
Late Oligocene leaf and pollen flora of Southwestern Siberia: taxonomy, biogeography
and palaeoenvironments
Thomas Denk
a
, Johannes Martin Bouchal
b
, Pavel Smirnov
c
and Yaroslav Trubinc
a
Swedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Palaeobiology, Stockholm, Sweden; bDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Research Group
Aerobiology and Pollen Information, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria; cLaboratory of Sedimentology and Paleobiosphere Evolution, University
of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia
ABSTRACT
ARTICLE HISTORY
Late Oligocene leaf assemblages from four sites in Southwestern Siberia (Kurgan, Tyumen, Omsk oblasts) are
described. Twenty-three leaf taxa and 3 reproductive structures represent local vegetation of a lake (Salvinia,
Typha, Phragmites, Nelumbo, Hemitrapa, Liquidambar, Pterocarya, Alnus, Populus, Salix, Nyssa). Additionally,
57 spore and pollen taxa were recorded from one site (Shish River). Gymnosperms dominate the assemblage
with ~30% Pinaceae and ~25% taxodiaceous (papillate) Cupressaceae pollen. Ferns and peat mosses
(Sphagnaceae) comprised ~6%. Angiosperms were dominated by Fagaceae, Betulaceae, Juglandaceae and
Ulmus and comprised a few exotic elements (Liquidambar, Eucommia, Nyssa, Symplocos); scarce herbaceous
plants reflect lakeshore vegetation. The flora of the Turgay type comprised old elements (Nelumbo protospeciosa, Liquidambar europaea, taxodiaceous/papillate Cupressaceae, Quercus sect. Protobalanus) and taxa
present in Siberia/Kazakhstan during the Paleogene with later arrivals in Europe (Ulmus pyramidalis, Quercus
pseudocastanea, Alnus julianiformis, Byttneriophyllum tiliifolium). A few taxa were endemic in the late
Oligocene of western Siberia (Trapa praeconocarpa, Platycrater iljinskajae sp. nov.). Combined macrofossil
and palynological evidence places the Shish River site flora into the late Oligocene Zhuravka (Turtas)
Formation. Floras of similar composition from western Eurasia are commonly middle Miocene or younger
in age highlighting the dynamic spatiotemporal evolution of temperate Eurasian floras during the Cenozoic.
Received 1 September 2020
Accepted 15 October 2020
Introduction
Modern plant biogeographic patterns including the disjunct distribution of the north temperate woody flora in eastern and western North
America, western Eurasia, and East Asia were established during the
Cenozoic (Latham and Ricklefs 1993; Manchester 1999). Migrations of
temperate plants from East Asia to western Eurasia included vast areas
of northern Russia and Central Asia, which today are characterised by
arid steppe and cold boreal climates (Kottek et al. 2006). In Western
Siberia, tectonic uplift at the end of the Eocene led to a marine regression and by the early Oligocene a continental regime of sedimentation
was established (Arkhipov et al. 2005). From the Oligocene onwards,
modern temperate tree taxa constituted an important part of the
palaeovegetation, many of which had originated in East Asia and
arrived in western Eurasia in the Oligocene (Zhilin 1989, 2001;
Walther 1994; Mai 1995). Because of the dynamic spatiotemporal
evolution of this temperate flora, it is difficult to correlate Eastern
Siberian, Western Siberian, and western Eurasian floras, and inferring
ages of fossil floras based on strict biostratigraphical grounds may be
misleading. For example, members of Quercus sect. Cerris occurred in
Northeast Asia during the early Oligocene, but arrived in western
Eurasia no earlier than the Oligocene/Miocene boundary (Denk et al.
2017). Fagus and the extinct genus Chaneya were present in East Asia
and western North America during the Eocene and arrived in Central
Asia (Kazakhstan) and Europe in the Oligocene (Wang and
Manchester 2000; Teodoridis and Kvaček 2005; Denk and Grimm
2009a; Feng and Jin 2012; Hofmann et al. 2019). At the species level,
Alnus julianiformis (as A. feroniae) occurred in the Aquitanian (early
Miocene) floras of western Kazakhstan (Zhilin 1989) and arrived in
KEYWORDS
Biostratigraphy;
palaeobotany;
palaeopalynology;
biogeography; Cenozoic;
Eurasia; Quercus section
Protobalanus
Europe during the Burdigalian (Kvaček and Holý 1974). Alnus schmalhausenii was a characteristic element of early Oligocene floras in
western Kazakhstan (Zhilin 1989) and very similar forms occurred in
the late Oligocene and early Miocene of the western and eastern
Mediterranean region (Saporta 1891; Velitzelos et al. 2014).
Stratigraphic schemes for the Paleogene and Neogene of
Western Siberia have been proposed using carpological data (e.g.
Nikitin 2006) and, primarily, palynological data (e.g. Arkhipov et al.
2005; Kuzmina and Volkova 2008; Gnibidenko et al. 2011; Volkova
et al. 2016; Kuzmina et al. 2019). A stratigraphic scheme for western
Kazakh leaf floras was suggested by Zhilin (1974, 1989)). For some
of these pollen and leaf floras their correlation with vertebrate
faunas and marine molluscs provided independent age constraints.
Key sections for dating fossil plant assemblages of southwestern
Siberia and Western Kazakhstan included the Baygubek Formation
(Horizon) of the North Ustyurt region and the Aral Formation in
the North Aral region (e.g. Zhilin 1989). Marine molluscs of the
lower and upper Baygubek Formation and vertebrate remains in the
Aral Formation (Akespe locality) provided evidence for the
Aquitanian age of the upper Baygubek Horizon and the Aral
Formation and their leaf and spore-pollen assemblages (Zhilin
1989). Based on this correlation, the age of major pollen and
spore zones (pollen assemblages) in adjacent southwestern Siberia
was established (e.g. Unified regional stratigraphic schemes for
Neogene and Paleogene deposits of the West Siberian Plain 2001).
More recent stratigraphic correlations of marine sediments
across Eurasia placed the Baygubek Formation in the late
Oligocene (Chattian; Popov et al. 1993, 2004). Likewise, in the
North Aral region, ‘Aquitanian’ layers with Paraceratherium
CONTACT Thomas Denk
thomas.denk@nrm.se
Swedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Palaeobiology, Stockholm 10405, Sweden
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
Published online 11 Dec 2020
2
T. DENK ET AL.
according to Zhilin (1989, p. 230) and micromammals of a key
sequence exposed at Akespe (Lucas et al. 1998; Lopatin 2004;
Bendukidze et al. 2009) indicate a Chattian age for the Aral
Formation. Independently, correlation of dinocyst assemblages
across Eurasia in combination with regional palynological and
palaeomagnetic data has recently resulted in a revised stratigraphic
framework for the West Siberian Plain (Gnibidenko 2007;
Gnibidenko et al. 2011, 2014; Volkova et al. 2016). This stratigraphic framework is in agreement with the revised stratigraphy
proposed for the North Ustyurt and North Aral regions and is here
followed.
In the present paper, we describe four small plant assemblages
from Southwestern Siberia (Kurgan, Tyumen, and Omsk oblasts)
and establish biogeographic relationships of the fossil-taxa with
Cenozoic plant assemblages and with modern taxa. For one of the
studied sites, we also investigated dispersed spores and pollen. We
discuss the age of the plant-bearing sites based on comparisons with
palynological and macro-palaeobotanical data from the region.
Finally, we infer palaeoenvironments based on the ecological properties of the constituting plant taxa.
Materials and methods
The material investigated here was collected in the 1950s by Sergei
Sukhov from natural outcrops. In 1992, his son donated the collection to the ‘Regional Tyumen Museum Complex named after Ivan
Slovtsov’. Macrofossils deposited in the collections of the Regional
Tyumen Museum bear labels indicating the taxon name and the
specimen number with the additional prefixes ДВХ and ОФ. The
latter mean Основной фонд (main collection) and
Дополнительный внутренний фонд хранения (additional internal storage collection). In addition, specific information about the
storage location is indicated on the specimens (e.g. I-1-2; see
Appendix 1 for complete label information of the investigated
specimens along with previous and current determination).
The four sites studied in the present paper were exposed along
small tributaries of the Irtysh River (Shish River site, Bicha River
site, and Turtas River site) and of the Tobol River (Kizak River site;
Figure 1) and are located between 56 and 59°N in the West Siberian
Plain.
General geology
Oligocene strata in Southwestern Siberia are represented mainly
by continental deposits comprising silt, clay, sandy clay, and
sand. Four stratigraphic horizons are distinguished (Figure 2).
These are the Isi’kul’ Formation (corresponding to the Atlym
Formation on the right bank of the Irtysh), Novomikhailovka
Formation, Zhuravka Formation (replaced by the coeval Turtas
Formation in the central and northern regions of the West
Siberian Plain), and the Abrosimovka Formation (Volkova
et al. 2016, Figure 2, 3).
The lower Oligocene Isi’kul’ (Atlym) Formation reflects
mainly lacustrine alluvial sedimentation and is composed of
sands with clays and silts (Kuz’mina and Volkova 2008).
During deposition of the following Novomikhailovka
Formation, sediments accumulated in a single sedimentary
basin in the vast area of the West Siberian Plain. The formation
is made up of alternating rusty-brown clays, silts, and sand with
lignite seams. The intensification of tectonic movements during
deposition of the upper Oligocene Zhuravka horizon led to the
isolation of the Turtas and Zhuravka basins, which were separated by latitudinally oriented uplands.
Figure 1. Map of Southwestern Siberia, Irtysh River with the locations of the Turtas,
Kizak, Bicha and Shish River sites. Further sites relevant for the age determination of
the Shish leaf and spore/pollen assemblage are indicated (a–g). a. Zashchitino
Village (Volkova et al. 2016), b. Borehole 8, Om Basin, Southwestern Siberia
(Gnibidenko et al. 2011), c. Zyryanskaya-1 borehole, southwestern Tyumen region
(Oreshkina et al. 2020), d–f. Bigila, Pyatkovo, and Masali villages (Kuz’mina et al.
2019). g. Neverovka Village, Borehole 1 (Kuz’mina and Volkova 2001). h.
Chistoozernyi Village, Borehole 13 (Kuz’mina and Volkova 2008).
The Zhuravka horizon includes the Zhuravka and Turtas formations, of which the latter comprises greenish-grey clays and
siltstones enriched with thinly layered glauconite, with interlayers
of diatomites. The position of the Turtas Formation in the regional
stratigraphic scheme of the Paleogene deposits of Western Siberia
has been intensively studied. Currently, the late Oligocene
(Chattian) age of the formation is corroborated by marine molluscs
and micromammal data from the North Ustyurt and North Aral
regions and by palynological data (Volkova et al. 2000, 2016) and
correlation with dinocysts and palaeomagnetic data (Volkova et al.
2016; Oreshkina et al. 2020). According to Shatsky (1978) the
Turtas Formation is a deeper water facies of the central part of
the basin, while the coeval Zhuravka Formation is a marginal facies
developed in the Kulunda and Baraba steppes, Omsk and Pavlodar
Irtysh regions (Zaltsman 1968; Zykin 2012). Hence, the main distribution of the Zhuravka Formation facies is slightly to the southeast of the outcrops investigated for the present study (Figure 1).
The four sites investigated here, lie within the boundaries of the
Turtas Formation (Oreshkina et al. 2020).
Further differentiation of lake basins continued during the later
Oligocene and Miocene as the Abrosimovka and later formations
were deposited. The Abrosimovka Formation is composed of clays
and silts with interlayers of sand and lignite. The age of the
Abrosimovka horizon has initially been established by comparing
its spore-pollen spectra with those of the upper Baygubekian subhorizon of the Aral Sea and North Ustyurt regions (Boytsova and
Panova 1973). The stratigraphic position of the Abrosimovka
Formation (horizon) has been a matter of debate and has variously
been ascribed to the late Oligocene (e.g. Dorofeev 1963; Zykin 2012)
and to the early Miocene (e.g. Zhilin 1989; Unified regional stratigraphic schemes for Neogene and Paleogene deposits of the West
Siberian Plain 2001) based on stratigraphic correlation with the
upper subhorizon of the Baygubekian Formation (Suite) of the
North Ustyurt region. Considering the revised stratigraphy of the
North Ustyurt and the North Aral regions (Popov et al. 2004;
HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
3
Figure 2. Geological section of the Paleogene-Neogene sedimentary rocks in Southwestern Siberia (based on borehole 8, ’b’ in Fig. 1; Gnibidenko et al. 2011) and its
correlation with magnetostratigraphic section. Drawing the Paleogene/Neogene boundary above the Ambrosimovka Formation follows Volkova et al. (2016) and is further
discussed in the text. The leaf and pollen-spore assemblages of the Shish locality are correlated with the late Oligocene Zhuravka Horizon and the Turtas Formation.
Bendukidze et al. 2009; Zhang et al. 2018) a late Oligocene age
seems more plausible.
Further, in view of the uniformity of spore-pollen and dinocyst
assemblages between the Turtas and Abrosimovka formations,
Volkova et al. (2016) established the Abrosimovka Formation as the
last stage in the development of the vast lacustrine basin (Turtas SeaLake) in the West Siberian Plain in the late Oligocene (Figure 3).
Between the Abrosimovka Formation and the Beshcheul
Formation, a locally distinct horizon is recognised by some authors
(e.g. Zykin 2012) as lowermost Miocene Ombinsk horizon composed of lake, river, and lake-peat deposits (corresponding to sporepollen assemblage SPA4 in Volkova et al. 2016). The lower Miocene
Beshcheul Formation is composed of brownish-grey sands with clay
interlayers. The occurrence of this formation is confined to a rather
extensive river network with a northward flow. The sedimentation
environment of the Tavolzhan (Kalkaman) horizon is characteristic
of a low-lying, accumulative plain with a large number of shallow
lakes. Its age is determined chiefly by the fauna of mammals
corresponding to zones MN 9 and 10 of the Neogene of Eurasia.
A feature relevant for the present study is the Turtas Sea-Lake,
comparable in scale to the Paleogene marine basins that existed
during the late Oligocene in most of Western Siberia and comprised
several large inland water bodies (Smirnov et al. 2017; Oreshkina
et al. 2020). It was the development of this large intracontinental
freshwater hydro-system, its gradual disintegration into a system of
individual water bodies, degradation, waterlogging, with the subsequent development of lake-alluvial sedimentation conditions that
determined the evolution of the region during the late Oligocene.
Processing of the palynological sample
The palynological sample was obtained from a slab collected by
Sukhov from the Shish River locality. It is part of the Sergei Sukhov
collection, stored at the ‘Regional Tyumen Museum Complex
named after Ivan Slovtsov’. The rock sample was processed using
standard methods (40% HF to dissolve silica, 20% HCl to dissolve
fluorspar, chlorination, acetolysis; Halbritter et al. 2018). The residue was transferred to glycerol and is stored at the Swedish
4
T. DENK ET AL.
Figure 3. Updated stratigraphic scheme for Southwestern Siberia (modified from Volkova et al. 2016). Floristic levels after Nikitin (2006); regional palynozones after Unified
regional stratigraphic schemes for Neogene and Paleogene deposits of the West Siberian Plain (2001); spore-pollen assemblages after Kuzmina and Volkova (2008) and
Volkova et al. (2016).The Zhuravka and Abrosimovka horizons (formations) of Southwestern Siberia are correlated with strata containing marine molluscs from the North
Ustyurt region (Popov et al. 2004) and with continental deposits of the North Aral region with a rich micromammal fauna (Bendukidze et al. 2009), both being of Chattian
age. Further, homogenous dinocyst assemblages of the Zhuravka and Abrosimovka horizons and their correlation with Chinese dinocyst assemblages, corroborate a
Chattian age of these horizons.
Museum of Natural History in Stockholm under collection numbers S184995–184999. Five hundred palynomorphs were counted
and identified (Table 3; Appendix 2) in LM investigation for palynomorph abundance determination. Scanning electron microscopy
(SEM) investigation of the palynomorphs is still ongoing. For the
present study, biogeographically important members of Fagaceae
were documented with SEM to assign them to infrageneric groups
of the genus Quercus. The protocol of SEM investigation follows
Bouchal et al. (2020).
containing leaf imprints was processed for palynological investigation.
The spores and pollen identified from this sample are listed in Table 2
and their abundances in Table 3 (see also Appendix 2).
Class Polypodiopsida Cronquist, Takht. & Zimmerm. 1966
Family Salviniaceae Martinov 1820
Genus Salvinia Ség. 1754
Salvinia sp.(Figure 4(a))
Material examined – Kizak 3043 I-1-2
Systematic Palaeobotany
In the following, 1 fern and 25 angiosperm taxa are described (Table 1).
Angiosperm taxa are arranged following The Angiosperm Phylogeny
Group (2016). For the Shish River site, a small piece from a slab
Description
Two floating leaves, ca. 1 cm across, lamina almost round, venation
obscure, a striate or punctate pattern on the lamina may reflect
secondary veins and/or hairs/papillae.
HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
5
Table 1. Leaf and fruit fossil-taxa from four localities in Southwestern Siberia and their preferred habitats.
Taxon
Polypodiopsida
Salvinia sp.
Coniferales
Coniferales, fam., gen. et spec. indet
Angiosperms
Poaceae
Typha latissima
Phragmites oeningensis
Nelumbonaceae
Nelumbo protospeciosa
Altingiaceae
Liquidambar europaea
Ulmaceae
Ulmus pyramidalis
Fagaceae
Quercus pseudocastanea
Quercus kubinyii
Juglandaceae
Pterocarya paradisiaca
Juglans zaisanica
Betulaceae
Alnus julianiformis
Alnus vel Corylus
Betula sp.
Carpinus grandis
Salicaceae
Populus balsamoides
Populus glandulifera
Populus latior
Populus sp.
Salix lavateri
Lythraceae
Hemitrapa praeconocarpa
Tiliaceae
Byttneriophyllum tiliifolium
Nyssaceae
Nyssa sibirica
Hydrangeaceae
Hydrangea (Platycrater) iljinskajae
Incertae sedis
Fam., gen, et spec., indet 1
Fam., gen, et spec., indet 2
Ecology
Shish River
Kizak River
AQ
+
?
+
AQ
AQ
+
+
AQ
+
R
+
R
Z
Z
Turtas River
+
++
++
+
R
R
+
R
R
Z
Z
+
+
R
R
R
R
R
+
AQ
Bicha River
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+++
+
+
+
++
+
R
+
R
+
Z
+
?
?
+
+
+
+
+++ = ≫ 10 specimens; ++ = 5–10 specimens; + = 1–4 specimens
AQ = aquatic habitat, R = riparian and swamp forest habitat, Z = zonal, well-drained forest habitat
Note that riparian elements may also have formed part of the zonal vegetation
Remarks
Salvinia had a wide distribution across Eurasia from Eocene to
Miocene. From Western Siberia, Dorofeev (1963) described
several species of Salvinia based on reproductive structures.
Our leaves are very poorly preserved but are clearly roundish
in outline and relatively small. Knobloch and Kvaček (1976)
suggested using the name Salvinia mildeana Göpp. for poorly
preserved leaf remains. Salvinia mildeana from the type locality Sosnica (Schossnitz, late Miocene) has oval leaves unlike
the ones reported here. Based on lamina shape, size, and
venation, the fossil leaves from Kizak resemble the Miocene
Salvinia sunschae Palib. (Shaparenko 1956). Spores of Salvinia
were not encountered in the Shish River site pollen sample.
Class Coniferopsida Cronquist, Takht. & Zimmerm. 1966
Order Coniferales Gorozh.1904
Coniferales fam. et gen. indet.
(Figure 4(b))
Material examined – Kizak 9187–25
Description
Leaf fragment, ca. 3 cm long, 0.3 cm wide, oblong, apex bluntly
acute, mid-vein strong, flanked by two stomatal bands, margin
thickened.
Remarks
A few leaf remains do not provide sufficient information to ascribe
them to a particular family and genus in the Coniferales. In general,
the macrofossil record is almost void of conifer leaves and reproductive structures, whereas conifers are the most prominent elements in the pollen record.
Clade AngiospermaeOrder Poales Small 1903
Family Typhaceae Juss. 1789Genus Typha L. 1753
Typha latissima A.Braun 1849
(Figure 4(c–e))
Typha latissima A.Braun – Braun in Bruckmann 1849, p. 227
Typha latissima A.Braun – Braun in Stitzenberger 1851, p. 75
Typha latissima A.Braun – Heer 1855, p. 98, pl. 43–44
Typha latissima A.Braun – Kolakovsky 1964, p. 36, pl. 5, figs 4–6
Typha latissima A.Braun – Iljinskaja 1968, p. 45, pl. 14, figs 3, 4
6
T. DENK ET AL.
Table 2.: Spore and pollen fossil-taxa from the Shish River site and their preferred habitats. Note that a number of conifers that are today found on well-drained soils, were
part of peat forming vegetation during large parts of the Cenozoic (Schneider 1992; Dolezych and Schneider 2006, 2007, 2012).
Dispersed spores and pollen from the leaf-bearing layer of the Shish River site
Spores
Laevigatosporites haardtia
Sphagnum
Osmundaceae
Trilete Spores
Lycophyta
Gymnosperms
Cupressaceae
Papillate Cupressaceae
Pinaceae
Pinus Haploxylon
Pinus Diploxylon
Picea
Cathaya
Larix
Abies
Tsuga (2 types)
Angiosperms
Potamogetonaceae
Potamogeton
Poaceae
Poaceae?
Typhaceae
Typha
Cyperaceae
Carex
Nelumbonaceae
Nelumbo
Altingiaceae
Liquidambar
Vitaceae
Parthenocissus (L)
Salicaceae
Salix
Rosaceae
Rosaceae gen indet.
Ulmacae
Ulmus
Fagaceae
Castaneoideae
Fagus
Quercus sect. Cerris
Ecology
R
R
AQ
R
R
R
AQ
R
AQ
AQ
R
R
AQ
R
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
AQ
AQ
R
AQ
R
AQ
R
Z
AQ
R
R
Z
R
R
Z
R
Z
Z
Z
Fagaceae
Quercus subgen. Quercus
sect. Protobalanus
Quercus subgen. Quercus
excl. sect. Protobalanus
Myricaceae
Myrica
Juglandaceae
Carya
Pterocarya
Juglans
Betulaceae
Alnus
Carpinus
Betula
Corylus
Lythraceae
Hemitrapa vel Trapa
Lythrum
Onagraceae
Ludwigia
Nitrariaceae
Nitraria
Sapindaceae
Acer (2 types)
Malvaceae
Tilia
Santalaceae
Arceuthobium (P)
Amaranthaceae
Amaranthaceae gen. indet.
Nyssaceae
Nyssa
Ericaceae
Ericaceae (3 types)
Symplocaceae
Symplocos
Eucommiaceae
Eucommia
Oleaceae
Fraxinus
Aquifoliaceae
Ilex
Caprifoliaceae
Lonicera (L)
Ecology
Z
AQ
R
Z
R
R
R
R
Z
R
Z
Z
Z
AQ
AQ
R
AQ
R
Z
R
Z
Z
R
Z
H
R
AQ
R
Z
Z
Z
R
Z
R
Z
R
Z
a
botanical affinities unclear but possibly with Polypodiaceae
AQ = aquatic, swamp, and peat forming vegetation, R = riparian, Z = zonal (well-drained), H = halophyte (may also be part of R, Z), P = parasite, L = liana
Material examined – Kizak 3043–22, 3043–23, 9187–10; Turtas
9187–93/1
Description
Leaf fragments, venation parallelodromous with short perpendicular ‘veins’ connecting the main veins.
Remarks
Leaves of Typha are dorsiventral, up to 0.5 cm thick in living plants,
parallel-sided, with many parallelodromous veins, crescentic on the
outer surface, flat on the inner surface. The substance of lamina and
sheath is made up of continuous columns of lacunae separated longitudinally by perpendicular partitions or diaphragms (Rowlatt and
Morshead 1992). When strongly compressed, the imprints of these
diaphragms appear as short ‘veins’ that are oriented perpendicular to
the primary veins. This is the typical Typha pattern observed in fossil
leaves and distinguishing such leaves from other large-leaved
graminoids, such as Phragmites. Leaf remains of Typha latissima
were figured from Miocene strata of Georgia and Ukraine
(Kolakovski 1964; Iljinskaya 1968) and from late Oligocene strata of
Kazakhstan (Kryshtofovich 1956). Typha is a characteristic element
of the reed belt. In the Shish River site pollen sample Typha is
rare (0.4%).
Family Poaceae Barnhart 1895
Genus Phragmites Adans. 1763
Phragmites oeningensis A.Braun 1845
(Figure 4(f–g))
Phragmites oeningensis A.Braun – Braun 1845, p. 75
Phragmites oeningensis A.Braun – Iljinskaja 1968, p. 44, pl. 24,
figs 1–3, pl. 44, figs 1, 2
Material examined – Kizak 9187–14; Turtas 3043–2, 9187–93/2
HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
Table 3. Shish River site: Abundance of spores and pollen for individual plant
groups based on 500 counted grains (see also Appendix 1).
Organism
Spore plant
Spore plant
Spore plant
Spore plant
Gymnosperm
Gymnosperm
Gymnosperm
Gymnosperm
Gymnosperm
Gymnosperm
Gymnosperm
Gymnosperm
Gymnosperm
Gymnosperm
Angiosperm herb
Angiosperm herb
Angiosperm herb
Angiosperm herb
Angiosperm herb
Angiosperm woody
Angiosperm woody
Angiosperm woody
Angiosperm woody
Angiosperm woody
Angiosperm woody
Angiosperm woody
Angiosperm woody
Angiosperm woody
Angiosperm woody
Angiosperm woody
Angiosperm woody
Angiosperm woody
Angiosperm woody
Angiosperm woody
Angiosperm woody
Angiosperm woody
Angiosperm woody
Angiosperm woody
Angiosperm woody
Angiosperm woody
Angiosperm woody
Angiosperm woody
Sum
Taxon
Laevigatosporites haardti
Osmundaceae
Leiotroletes
Lycophyta
Papillate Cupressaceae hiatus
Papillate Cupressaceae
Cathaya
Pinus Haploxylon
Pinus Diploxylon
Abies
Picea
Larix
Tsuga (small saccus)
Tsuga (wide saccus, echinate)
Potamogeton
Typha
Cyperaceae
Poaceae
Chenopodiaceae
Fraxinus
Liquidambar
Fagus
Quercus (not differentiated)
Castaneoideae
Myrica
Carya
Pterocarya
Juglans
Alnus
Carpinus
Betula
Corylus
Nyssa
Ulmus
Hemitrapa vel Trapa
Ilex
Eucommia
Lythrum
Symplocos
Ericaceae
Acer
indet.
Number
20
7
4
1
72
57
24
62
44
10
2
2
1
3
1
2
1
4
1
4
24
12
35
9
4
1
5
8
9
4
15
15
7
10
6
1
4
2
1
1
2
3
500
%
4.0%
1.4%
0.8%
0.2%
14.4%
11.4%
4.8%
12.4%
8.8%
2.0%
0.4%
0.4%
0.2%
0.6%
0.2%
0.4%
0.2%
0.8%
0.2%
0.8%
4.8%
2.4%
7.0%
1.8%
0.8%
0.2%
1.0%
1.6%
1.8%
0.8%
3.0%
3.0%
1.4%
2.0%
1.2%
0.2%
0.8%
0.4%
0.2%
0.2%
0.4%
0.6%
100%
Description
Leaf fragments with parallelodromous venation typical of Poaceae;
stem fragments consisting of nodes and constricted internodes.
Remarks
Relatively wide leaves of this type are commonly produced by reed,
Phragmites, a chief element of lakeshore vegetation. Nevertheless,
based on the poorly preserved leaf and axis remains, it is impossible
to assign them to a particular modern genus. Hence, we note that
the fossil-species Phragmites oeningensis might include more than
one monocot taxon.
Order Proteales Juss. ex Bercht. et J.Presl 1820
Family Nelumbonaceae A.Rich. 1827
Genus Nelumbo Adans. 1763
Nelumbo protospeciosa Saporta 1891
(Figure 4(h–i))
Nelumbium protospeciosa Saporta – Saporta 1891, p. 17, pl. 1,
figs 2, 3, pl. 4, figs 1, 2
Nelumbo protospeciosa Saporta – Takhtajan (ed.) 1974, pl. 32,
figs 1–3
7
Nelumbo protospeciosa Saporta – Iljinskaja 1968, p. 63, pl. 3, fig.
8, pl. 19, figs 1, 2
Material examined – Shish 3043–47 (2 specimens)
Description
Leaf, simple, lamina orbicular, >11 cm in diameter, margin entire,
main veins radiating from centre towards margin, branching before
margin and forming loops.
Remarks
According to Zhilin (1989), this species might be of East Asian
origin and migrated to Central Asia during the Paleogene. Nelumbo
protospeciosa is known, for example, from Eocene deposits in
Kamchatka (Budantsev 1997). The type locality for the species,
Manosque, southern France (Figure 4(j)), is probably of late
Oligocene age (Saporta de 1891; Mai 1995). The earliest fossil
records of hardy types of Nelumbo producing tubers are from
middle and late Eocene strata of East Asia (Li et al. 2014), from
where this lineage migrated westwards during the later Paleogene
and Neogene. In the Shish River site pollen sample Nelumbo is rare
(a single grain was encountered).
Order Saxifragales Bercht. et J.Presl 1820
Family Altingiaceae (Horan. 1841) Lindl. 1846
Genus Liquidambar L. 1753
Liquidambar europaea A.Braun ex Buckland 1836
(Figure 5(a))
Liquidambar europaeum A.Braun – Braun in Buckland 1836,
p. 513.
Liquidambar europaeum A.Braun – Braun 1845, p. 170.
Liquidambar europaea A.Braun – Kovar-Eder et al. 2004, p. 58,
pl. 2, figs 1–5.
Material examined – Shish 3043–46
Description
Leaf, simple, palmate, shallowly five-lobed, lobes triangular, lamina
5.5 cm long, 8 cm wide, base shallowly cordate, lobe apex acuminate, five main veins, margin finely crenate.
Remarks
Liquidambar europaea appeared in the Eocene of western North
America/Beringia (Manchester 1999) and migrated to Central Asia
and Europe during the Paleogene. Early Oligocene records are
known both from Kazakhstan and Europe (Lai et al. 2018).
According to Zhilin (1989), Liquidambar europaea was probably
an east-Asiatic newcomer to Kazakhstan at the end of the Eocene. It
became one of the most common plants in the Oligocene to
Aquitanian floras of Kazakhstan. In the Shish River site pollen
sample Liquidambar is abundant (4.8%).
Order Rosales Bercht. et J.Presl 1820
Family Ulmaceae Mirb. 1815
Genus Ulmus L. 1753
Ulmus pyramidalis Göpp. 1855
(Figure 5(b–e))
Ulmus longifolia Unger – Unger 1847, p. 101, pl. 26, figs 5, 6
Ulmus pyramidalis Göpp. – Göppert 1855, p. 29, pl. 13, figs
10–12
Ulmus longifolia Unger – Güner et al. 2017, p. 131, pl. 11, fig. 5.
Material examined – Kizak 3043–4, 3043–13, 3043–24, 3043–26,
9187–13, 9187–15, 9187–16 (2 specimens)
8
T. DENK ET AL.
Figure 4. a, Salvinia sp., Kizak 3043 I-1-2, floating leaves with striate surface pattern. b, Coniferales leaf, Kizak 9187–25. c–e, Typha latissima A.Braun, leaf fragments, (c)
Kizak 9187–10, (d) Kizak 3043/22, 23, (e) Turtas 9187–93/1. f–g, Phragmites oeningensis A.Braun, leaf fragments, (f) Turtas 3043–2, (g) Turtas 9187–93/2. h–j. Nelumbo
protospeciosa Saporta, leaf fragments, (h) Shish 3043–47/1, (i) Shish 3043–47/2, (j), leaf from Manosque, France, late Oligocene, MNHN.F.13468. Scale bar 2 cm (a–j).
HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
9
Figure 5. a, Liquidambar europaea A.Braun, leaf, Shish 3043–46. b–e, Ulmus pyramidalis Göpp, leaf fragments, (b) Kizak 3043–13, (c–d) Kizak 9187–16, (d) leaf margin detail,
(e) Kizak 9187–15. Scale bar 2 cm (a–e).
Description
Leaf, simple, petiolate, petiole ca. 1–1.3 cm long, lamina elliptic,
5–7 cm long, 3–4 cm wide, lamina base asymmetrical, markedly
asymmetrically auriculate, apex, acute, primary venation pinnate,
secondary venation craspedodromous, 12–14 pairs of secondary
veins, secondary veins occasionally branching in upper third, tertiary veins percurrent or branching, perpendicular to secondary
veins, margin double serrate, main teeth served by secondary
veins, subsidiary teeth served by abmedial veins.
Remarks
Ulmus longifolia Unger (Unger 1847), widely used for such slender
leaves of elms (e.g. Güner et al. 2017) is an illegitimate name
because it had earlier been used for an extant elm species from
southeastern North America by Rafinesque (1836).
According to Iljinskaja (1982) and Zhilin (1989), the species was
present in Kazakhstan during the Burdigalian and in western
Siberia during the Oligocene. In Europe, this species is relatively
common during the middle and late Miocene (Hantke 1954;
10
T. DENK ET AL.
Figure 6. a–f, Quercus pseudocastanea Göpp., leaf fragments, Kizak River site, (a) 9187–21, (b) 9187–22, (c) 9187–19, d 9187–25, (e) 3043–22, (f) 9187–23. Scale bar 2 cm (a–f).
HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
Knobloch 1969; Christensen 1976). In the Shish River site pollen
sample Ulmus is infrequent (2%).
Order Fagales Engler 1892
Family Fagaceae Dumort. 1829
Genus Quercus L. 1753
Quercus pseudocastanea Göpp. 1852
(Figure 6(a–f); 7A)
Quercus pseudocastanea Göpp. – Göppert 1852, p. 276, pl. 35,
figs 1, 2
Quercus pseudocastanea Göpp. – Iljinskaja 1982, p. 92, pl. 35, fig.
5, pl. 55, fig. 1, pl. 56, figs 1–4
Quercus pseudocastanea Göpp. – Walther and Zastawniak 1991,
p.169, pl. 2, figs 2, 3, 5, 6 pl. 3, figs 1–6, text-fig. 8
Quercus pseudocastanea Göpp. – Kvaček et al. 2002, p. 63, pl. 13,
figs 3–5, pl. 14, figs 1, 2, 4–6, pl. 15, figs 1, 4, 6, pl. 30, fig. 4
Material examined – Kizak 3043–22, 3043–27, 3043–28,
9187–10, 9187–19, 9187–21, 9187–22, 9187–23, 9187–25/1
Description
Leaf, simple, petiolate, petiole to ca. 2 cm long, lamina elliptic or
obovate, ca. 6–8 cm long, 4–6 cm wide, shallowly lobed, base
rounded to asymmetrically cordate, apex acute, primary venation
pinnate, primary vein stout basally, becoming thinner towards
apex, secondary venation craspedodromous, number of pairs of
secondary veins 4–8, rarely intersecondary veins present, tertiary
venation percurrent or branched, tertiary veins perpendicular to
secondary veins, forming a brochidodromous pattern in the lobe
area, lobes triangular, lobe apex bluntly pointed.
Remarks
Lobed oaks of this type do not occur in Europe before the middle
Miocene (Walther and Zastawniak 1991). This species is known
from the Oligocene of Kazakhstan (Iljinskaja 1982) and thus might
represent a lineage that spread westwards from East and/or Central
Asia to western Eurasia in the Neogene (cf. Zhilin 1989 for other
taxa showing this biogeographic pattern). Whereas Walther and
Zastawniak (1991) suggested intrageneric relationships with section
Cerris, Kvaček et al. (2002) noted closest anatomical similarities
with Q. petraea (sect. Quercus). The only living species of Q. sect.
Cerris comparable to the specimens from Kizak is the western
Eurasian Quercus cerris L. The morphological variability in this
species has recently been assessed (Denk et al. 2019). Based on the
specimens from Kizak, we tentatively consider them to be more
closely related to the white oaks, Q. sect. Quercus.
Quercus cf. kubinyii (Kováts ex Ettingshausen 1852) Czeczott 1951
(Figure 7(b,c))
Castanea kubinyii Kováts – Kováts in Ettingshausen 1852, p. 6,
pl. 1, fig. 12.
Castanea kubinyii Kováts – Kováts in Ettingshausen 1853, p. 23,
pl. 1, figs, 1, 2
Castanea kubinyii Kováts – Kováts 1856, p. 26, pl. 3, figs 1–7
Quercus kubinyii (Kováts) Czeczott – Czeczott 1951, p. 392, fig. 7
Quercus kushukensis Kornil. – Kornilova 1960, p. 38, pl. 1, fig. 10
pl. 2, fig. 9, pl. 3, figs 5, 7, 8, 12 pl. 8, fig. 13, pl. 13, figs 5–15, pl. 14,
figs 1–16, pl. 18, fig. 8(b), pl. 19, figs 4–7(a), pl. 20, figs 1, 2, 3(a), 4–9,
pl. 25, fig. 7, pl. 26, fig. 1, pl. 27, figs 1–10, pl. 28, figs 4, 5
Material examined – Shish 3043–48, 9187–49
11
Description
Leaf, simple, petiolate, petiole 3 cm long, lamina elliptic, >6 cm
long, 4–5 cm wide, base round, slightly auriculate, primary venation
pinnate, secondary venation craspedodromous, margin dentate,
teeth triangular, cuspidate, with bristle-like extensions of the secondary veins, basal side of teeth straight or sigmoid, apical side
concave, tertiary veins perpendicular to secondary veins, percurrent
or branched.
Remarks
Quercus kubinyii made its appearance in Europe in the early
Miocene (Bůžek et al. 1996) and was abundant in western
Eurasia during the middle and late Miocene (Walther and
Zastawniak 1991; Kvaček et al. 2002). It belongs to Quercus sect.
Cerris (Denk et al. 2017) and similar forms migrated from the Far
East to Central Asia and Europe beginning in the early Oligocene.
Quercus gigas Göpp., another fossil-species of sect. Cerris may
produce leaves that morphologically overlap with those of
Q. kubinyii (see e.g. Walther and Zastawniak 1991; Güner et al.
2017). This leaf type is not present in the late Oligocene Ashutas
flora of Kazakhstan (Kryshtofovich et al. 1956) but occurs abundantly in the Burdigalian flora of Kushuk (Kornilova 1960; Zhilin
1989). In the Shish River site pollen sample Quercus is abundant
(7%). SEM investigation revealed three different types of exine
sculpture corresponding to three infrageneric groups; (i) exine
with scattered microverrucae belonging to subgenus Cerris sect.
Cerris (Figure 13(d–g)), (ii) exine microrugulate to weakly microverrucate belonging to subgenus Quercus sect. Protobalanus
(Figure 13(h–j)), (iii) exine microverrucate belonging to subgenus
Quercus excluding sect. Protobalanus (Figure 13(k–m); Denk and
Grimm 2009b; Denk et al. 2017).
Family Juglandaceae DC. ex Perleb 1818
Genus Pterocarya Kunth. 1824
Pterocarya paradisiaca (Unger 1849) Iljinsk. 1994
(Figure 7(d,e))
Prunus paradisiaca Unger – Unger 1849, p. 7, pl. 14, fig. 22
Pterocarya castaneifolia (Göpp.) Schlecht. – Kryshtofovich et al.
1956, p. 82, pl. 13, figs 6–8, pl. 17, figs 1–7, text-figs 29–31
Pterocarya paradisiaca (Unger) Iljinsk. – Iljinskaja 1994, p. 55,
pl. 9, figs 4, 5, pl. 12, figs 1–4, pl. 13, figs 1–6, text-fig. 44: 1, 2
Material examined – Shish 3043–6 (2); Turtas 9187–4; Bicha
9187–94, 9187–95
Description
Incomplete leaflets, lamina base shallowly cordate, slightly asymmetrical, lamina oblong to elliptic, >6 cm long, c. 3–4 cm wide,
primary venation pinnate, secondary venation brochidodromous,
forming additional loops towards margin from which small veins
enter the teeth, leaf margin finely serrate, teeth with long basal and
short apical side, ca. 5 teeth per 1 cm.
Remarks
The specimens investigated in the present study are very similar to
the ones reported from the late Oligocene Ashutas locality
(Kryshtofovich et al. 1956). Pterocarya paradisiaca had a long stratigraphic range in Europe from the late Oligocene to the
Pleistocene. According to Zhilin (1989), this fossil-species appeared
in Kazakhstan in the early Oligocene. In the Shish River site, pollen
sample Pterocarya is infrequent (1%).
12
T. DENK ET AL.
Figure 7. a, Quercus pseudocastanea Göpp., leaf fragment, Kizak 3043–27. b–c, Quercus kubinyii (Kováts) Czeczott, leaf fragments, (b) Shish 9187–49, (c) 3043–48. d–e,
Pterocarya paradisiaca (Unger) Iljinsk., leaf fragments, (d) Turtas 9187–4, (e) Bicha 9187–94. f, Juglans zaisanica Iljinsk., leaf fragments, Bicha 3043/3. Scale bar 2 cm (a–f).
HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
13
Figure 8. a–b, Alnus julianiformis (Sternberg) Kvaček & Holý, leaf fragments, (a) Shish 3043/6-1, (b) Turtas 3043/10-1. c, Alnus vel Corylus, leaf fragment, Shish 9187–96. d,
Betula sp. Kizak 9187–12a. e. cf. Carpinus grandis Unger, leaf fragment, Kizak 9187–14. Scale bar 2 cm (a–e).
Genus Juglans L. 1753
cf. Juglans zaisanica Iljinsk. ex Krysht. 1956
(Figure 7(f))
Juglans zaisanica Iljinsk. – Kryshtofovich et al. 1956, p. 85, pl. 16,
fig. 3, text-fig. 32
Material examined – Bicha 3043–3, 3043–7, 9187–94 (partly)
Description
Leaflets, shortly petiolate, petiole bent, ca. 1 mm long, lamina incomplete, base asymmetrical, weakly auriculate, lamina narrow elliptic,
primary vein stout, much thicker than secondary veins, secondary
venation brochidodromous to eucamptodromous, margin entire.
Remarks
The few specimens at hand strongly resemble specimens of Juglans
zaisanica described from the late Oligocene Ashutas locality
(Kryshtofovich et al. 1956). This species is also known from middle
Miocene deposits of Krynka (Kryshtofovich and Baikovskaya 1965).
This fossil-taxon is very similar to the extant species Juglans regia
L. In the Shish River site pollen sample Juglans is infrequent (1.6%).
14
T. DENK ET AL.
Family Betulaceae Gray 1822
Genus Alnus Mill. 1754
Alnus julianiformis (Sternberg 1823) Kvaček & Holý 1974
(Figure 8(a,b))
Phyllites julianiformis Sternb. – Sternberg 1823, p. 37, pl. 36,
fig. 2
Fagus feroniae Unger – Unger 1845, p. 106, pl. 28, figs 3, 4
Alnus feroniae (Unger) Czeczott – Iljinskaja 1968, p. 55, pl. 2,
figs 1, 2, pl. 13, fig. 4, pl. 38, fig. 2, pl. 44, fig. 7
Alnus feroniae (Unger) Czeczott – Zhilin 1974, p. 35, pl. 13, figs
1, 2, pl. 34, figs 1–8
Alnus julianiformis (Sternberg) Kvaček & Holý – Kvaček and
Holý 1974, p. 368, pl. 1–3, pl. 4, fig. 1, text-fig. 1
Alnus feroniae (Unger) Czeczott – Iljinskaja 1982, pl. 86, figs 2–6
Material examined – Shish 3043–6 (1); Turtas 3043–10 (2
specimens)
Description
Leaf, simple, petiolate, petiole 1 – >1.3 cm long, lamina ovate or elliptic,
3.5 – >5 cm long, 3–4 cm wide, base obtuse to bluntly acute, primary
venation pinnate, primary vein stout, secondary venation craspedodromous, secondary veins sending off abmedial veins that enter into
bristle-like, small teeth, tertiary veins percurrent or branched, perpendicular to secondary veins.
Remarks
This species is based on material from early Miocene strata of Bílina
(Bohemia) and has a stratigraphic range in Europe from early
Miocene to Pliocene. It occurs in riparian and mixed mesophytic
forests (Kvaček and Holý 1974). In Kazakhstan, it occurred during
the Aquitanian (Iljinskaya 1982). In the Shish River site pollen
sample Alnus is infrequent (1.8%).
Alnus vel Corylus sp.
(Figure 8(c))
Material examined – Shish 9187–96 (2 leaf imprints)
Description
Leaf, lamina roundish, petiolate, petiole >0.3 cm long, lamina
7 cm long, 5–6 cm wide, one fragment of a larger leaf >9 cm
wise, base shallowly cordate to obtuse, apex obtuse, number of
secondary veins 7–8, basal secondary veins with abmedial veins,
basal secondary veins forming wide angles, apical secondary
veins forming acute angles with primary vein, margin only
fragmentary preserved, tertiary veins perpendicular to secondary veins, percurrent or branched, outermost tertiary veins
sending small veinlets into teeth.
Remarks
This leaf type either belongs to Alnus or Corylus. The overall leaf
shape and venation close to the margin match both genera, the
presence of several abmedial veins in the lower part of the lamina
fits well with Corylus. We note some similarity with the late
Oligocene species Corylus jarmolenkoi Grub. From Ashutas
(Kryshtofovich et al. 1956). The small number of specimens and
poor state of preservation do not allow a more exact determination.
In the Shish River site pollen sample Corylus is common (3%).
Genus Betula L. 1753
Betula sp.
(Figure 8(d))
Material examined – Kizak 9187–12a, 12b (part and counter-part)
Description
Leaf, upper portion of leaf blade, 3 cm long, 4 cm wide, secondary
venation craspedodromous, tertiary venation percurrent or
branched, perpendicular to secondary veins, margin compound
serrate, secondary vein terminating in primary tooth, abmedial
vein ending in secondary tooth, tooth apical and basal side slightly
sigmoid, tooth apex appearing glandular.
Remarks
Based on its compound serrate leaf margin this leaf remain probably belongs to Betula. In the Shish River site pollen sample Betula
is common (3%).
Genus Carpinus L. 1753
cf. Carpinus grandis Unger 1850
(Figure 8(e))
Carpinus grandis – Unger 1850, p. 408.
Carpinus grandis Unger – Heer 1856, p. 40, pl. 62, figs 12, 13,
15, 15b
Material examined – Kizak 9187–14
Description
Leaf, simple, petiolate, petiole ca. 6 mm long, lamina ca. 5.4 cm
long, ca. 2.3 cm wide, ovate, 11–12 pairs of secondary veins, secondary venation and margin not well preserved.
Remarks
A single poorly preserved leaf appears to be Carpinus. Since details
of the leaf margin are not preserved, the leaf is difficult to assign to
a particular fossil-species. Further, we cannot exclude that this leaf
belongs to another genus in the Fagales, such as, for example,
Carpinus. In the Shish River locality pollen sample Carpinus is
infrequent (0.8%).
Order Malpighiales Juss. ex Bercht. et J.Presl 1820
Family Salicaceae Mirb. 1815
Genus Populus L. 1753
Populus balsamoides Göpp. 1855
(Figure 9(a); 10A)
Populus balsamoides Göpp. – Göppert 1855, p. 23, pl. 15, figs 5, 6
Populus emarginata Göpp. – Göppert 1855, p. 23, pl. 15, figs 2–4
Populus eximia Göpp. – Göppert 1855, p. 23, pl. 16, figs 3–5, pl.
17, figs 1–3
Populus ovalis Göpp. – Göppert 1855, p. 23, pl. 16, fig. 1
Populus balsamoides Göpp. – Heer 1856, p. 18, pl. 60, figs 1–3, pl.
63, figs 5, 6
Material examined – Shish 3043–9, 3043–19, 9187–42, 9187–58
Description
Leaf, simple, petiolate, lamina roundish ovate, 6–10 cm long,
6–10 cm wide, primary venation pinnate, 5–6 pairs of secondary
veins, basal pair of secondary veins with abmedial veins, opadial
HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
15
Figure 9. a, Populus balsamoides Göpp. leaf fragment, Shish 3043–9. b, Populus glandulifera Heer, leaf fragment, Kizak 9187–17. c–d, Populus latior A.Braun, leaf fragments,
(c) Shish 3043–15, (d) Shish 3043–39. e, Populus sp., bract, Shish 3043–37. Scale bar 2 cm (a–d) and 0.5 cm (e).
16
T. DENK ET AL.
Figure 10. a, Populus balsamoides Göpp. leaf fragment, 3043–19 Shish. b, Salix lavateri A.Braun, leaf, Kizak 9187–25a. c–e, Hemitrapa praeconocarpa (V.N.Vassil) Budantsev,
fruit compressions and imprints, (c) Shish 9187–36, (d) Shish 3043–31, (e) Shish 3043–30. Scale bar 2 cm (a–e).
vein present, secondary venation brochidodromous, margin finely
crenate, small veins departing from loops formed by secondary/
abmedial veins serving crenulated teeth, teeth with blunt apex and
sinus, apical side with inconspicuous glandular thickening.
margin and sending small veins into the teeth, secondary veins
strongly bent, four pairs of secondary veins per lamina side, intersecondary veins present, margin crenate, teeth inconspicuous,
glandular.
Remarks
Populus balsamoides was present in Kazakhstan during the early to
late Oligocene. In the late Oligocene flora of Karashasor (Karasor) it
co-occurs with Liquidambar europaea, Pterocarya paradisiaca,
Ulmus carpinoides, and Alnus feroniae among others (Zhilin 1989).
Remarks
Hantke (1954) treated Populus glandulifera as synonym of P. latior
arguing that the mere presence of distinct glands was not sufficient
to warrant species status for such leaves. In addition, he noted that
in the modern balsam poplar species group, such glands are not
constant. We follow Iljinskaya (1982) and keep this taxon separate
from P. balsamoides.
Populus glandulifera Heer 1856
(Figure 9(b))
Populus glandulifera Heer – Heer 1856, p. 17, pl. 58, figs 6, 7, 10
Material examined – Kizak 3043–18, 9187–17, 9187–18
Populus latior A.Braun ex Buckland 1836
(Figure 9(c,d))
Description
Leaf, simple, petiolate, petiole stout, flattened, preserved along
3 cm, prominent glands on petiole and basal lamina at attachment
point to lamina, lamina broad ovate, ca. 9 cm long, 10 cm wide,
primary venation pinnate, secondary venation brochidodromous,
abmedial and secondary veins forming loops close to the lamina
Phyllites populina Brongn. – Brongniart 1822, p. 237, pl. 3, fig. 4
Populus latior A.Braun – Braun in Buckland 1836, p. 512
Populus latior A.Braun – Braun 1845, p. 169
Populus latior A.Braun – Heer 1856, p. 11, pl. 53–57
Populus populina (Brongn.) Erw.Knobloch – Knobloch 1964,
p. 601 nom. illeg. non Populus populina Jarm. – Jarmolenko
1935, p. 16
HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
Populus populina (Brongn.) Erw.Knobloch – Knobloch 1968,
p. 128
Populus populina (Brongn.) Erw.Knobloch – Kvaček et al. 2002,
p.82, pl. 21, figs 1–5
Material examined – Shish 3043–14–18, 3043–20, 3043–21,
3043–35, 3043–36, 3043–39–45, 9187–52–55, 9187–59–86
Description
Leaf, simple, petiolate, petiole stout, flattened, preserved part
2–3 cm long, lamina broad ovate to nearly round, 5–9.5 cm long,
5–10 cm wide, base wide obtuse, caudate, or cordate, apex acute to
acuminate, primary venation pinnate, two basal lateral veins thicker
than following secondary veins approaching in thickness the primary vein (pseudoactinodromous), several abmedial veins departing from basal lateral and secondary veins, branching or forming
loops from which higher order veins enter the teeth, secondary
veins brochidodromous/semicraspedodromous, occasionally intersecondary veins present, tertiary veins percurrent, perpendicular to
secondary veins, margin dentate, teeth fine to coarse, triangular to
hooked, with blunt glandular apex.
Remarks
It has been widely accepted that P. latior is a junior synonym of
P. populina as the basionym for the latter, Phyllites populina was
published earlier than Braun’s (1845) valid publication of P. latior
(Knobloch 1964). Recently, Doweld (2017) proposed to resurrect
the name Populus latior over P. populina as this name had earlier
been used for Cretaceous leaf remains by Jarmolenko in 1935. We
follow Doweld (2017) and use the name P. latior. Pollen of Populus
was not encountered in the Shish River site pollen sample. Pollen of
Populus has low fossilisation potential because its exine does not
form a continuous cover of sporopollenin (Rowley and Erdtman
1967) and is poorly preserved even in Quaternary sediments
(Cushing 1967).
Populus sp.
(Figure 9(e))
Populus latior A.Braun – Heer 1856, p. 10
Populus sp. – Hantke 1954, p. 53, pl. 4, fig. 3
Material examined – Shish 3043–37
Description
Floral bract, roundish, ca. 0.5 cm long, 0.5 cm wide, apex deeply cut,
segments serrate.
Remarks
The roundish floral bracts are closely similar to the extant species
P. tremula L. with a vast range across Eurasia.
Genus Salix L. 1753
Salix lavateri A.Braun ex Stitzenberger 1851 emend. Hantke 1954
(Figure 10(b))
Salix lavateri A.Braun – Braun in Stizenberger 1851, p. 78
Salix lavateri A.Braun – Heer 1856, p. 28, pl. 66, figs 1–12
Salix denticulata Heer – Heer 1856, p. 30, pl. 68, figs 1–4
Salix varians Göpp. – Heer 1859, p. 174, pl. 150, fig. 6
Salix lavateri A.Braun – Hantke 1954, p. 55, pl. 5, figs 2–16
Material examined – Bicha 3043–7 (2 specimens), Kizak
9187–25/2
17
Description
Leaf, simple, petiolate, narrow elliptic to lanceolate, 12 cm long,
2 cm wide, base acute, apex elongated acute, primary venation
pinnate, secondary venation eucamptodromous, intersecondary
veins present, secondary veins strongly bent, departing from midvein at nearly right angles, then bending towards margin and
running parallel with margin, margin entire or distinctly crenate,
teeth with glandular tip.
Remarks
The three leaves in our collection differ in leaf margin. The
few leaves from the Bicha River site could represent a different
willow species than the single leaf from the Kizak River site.
We follow Hantke (1954) and include crenate and entire margined
specimens
within
a
single
fossil-species
Salix lavateri. In the Shish River site pollen sample Salix is
infrequent (0.8%).
Order Myrtales Juss. ex Bercht. et J.Presl 1820
Family Lythraceae J.St.-Hil. 1805
Genus Hemitrapa Miki 1948
Hemitrapa praeconocarpa (V.N.Vassil. 1949) Budantsev 1960
(Figure 10(c–e))
Trapa praeconocarpa Vassilijev – Vassilijev 1949, p. 639
Trapa sp. – Kryshtofovich and Borsuk 1939, p. 393, pl. 4, fig. 17,
pl. 6, figs 1–3
Trapa praeconocarpa V.N.Vassilijev. – Baranov 1954, p. 355, pl.
165, figs 7–9
Hemitrapa praeconocarpa (V.N.Vassilijev.) Budantsev –
Budantsev 1960, p. 143
Material examined – Turtas 3043–29, Shish 3043–30, 3043–31,
3043–32, 9187–36, 9187–39
Description
Fruits, rhombic in cross-section, 1.5–3 cm long, with a single pair of
arms originating in the middle of the fruit, arms horn-like, tapering
in a sharp apex, stalk (preserved part) short, ca. 0.2–0.4 cm.
Remarks
Budantsev (1960) referred Miocene specimens from the Irtysh
River, Western Siberia, previously assigned to Trapa by Vassiljev
(1949) to Hemitrapa. Fossil records of Hemitrapa from Miocene
strata in Eurasia can be divided into two morphological types, one
with a single pair of arms and another with two pairs of arms
(Wang 2012; Su et al. 2018). Among the species with a single pair
of arms, the specimens described here closely match the description
of H. praeconocarpa in Wang (2012). In the Shish River site pollen
sample Hemitrapa vel Trapa is infrequent (1.2%).
Order Malvales Juss. ex Bercht. et J.Presl 1820
Family Malvaceae Juss. 1789
Genus Byttneriophyllum Givulescu ex Erw.Knobloch & Kvaček
1965
Byttneriophyllum tiliifolium (A.Braun) Erw.Knobloch & Kvaček
1965
(Figure 11(a), B; 12A)
Cordia tiliaefolia A.Braun – Braun 1845, p. 170
Dombeyopsis tiliaefolia (A.Braun) Unger – Unger 1850, p. 44, pl.
25 (46), figs 1–3 (?), 4, 5
Dombeyopsis grandifolia Unger – Unger 1850, p. 45, pl. 26 (47),
figs 1, 2, pl. 27 (48), figs 1, 2
18
T. DENK ET AL.
Figure 11. a–b, Byttneriophyllum tiliifolium (A.Braun) Erw.Knobloch & Kvaček, (a) leaf imprint, Turtas 9187–2:VI-25-3 Turtas, (b) leaf fragment, Bicha 3043–8. c, Hydrangea
(Platycrater) iljinskajae spec. nov., leaf fragment, Shish 3043–11 Shish. Scale bar 2 cm (a–c).
Ficus tiliaefolia (A.Braun) Heer – Heer 1856, p. 68, pl. 83, fig. 3
(?), 6–8, 9 (?), 10, 11, 12 (?), pl. 84, figs 1–5
Alangium aequalifolium (Göpp.) Krysht. & Bors. –
Kryshtofovich and Borsuk 1939, p. 390, pl. 5, figs 1–8, pl. 6, figs 6,
7, text-figs 1–8
Byttneriophyllum tiliifolium (A.Braun) Erw.Knobloch &
Kvaček – Knobloch and Kvaček 1965, p. 128, pl. 1, pl. 2, pl. 3, pl.
4, pl. 5, pl. 6, figs 1–4
Alangium tiliifolium (A.Braun) Krysht. – Iljinskaja 1968,
p. 81, pl. 6, fifs 2–11, pl. 18, fig. 1, pl. 24, fig. 4, pl. 26, fig. 1,
HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
19
Figure 12. a, Byttneriophyllum tiliifolium (A.Braun) Erw.Knobloch & Kvaček, leaf fragment, 9187–2: I-25-I Kizak. b, Fam., gen. et spec. indet 1, leaf fragment, Turtas 3043–10.
c, Fam., gen. et spec. indet 2, leaf fragment, Kizak 9187–25/1. Scale bar 2 cm (a–c).
pl. 27, fig. 6, pl. 33, fig. 9, pl. 42, fig. 5, pl. 47, fig. 1, pl. 48, figs
6, 7, pl. 49, figs 1–7, pl. 50, pl. 51, fig. 5, text-fig. 11
Material examined – Bicha 3043/8; Kizak 3043–25; Turtas
9187–2:VI-25-2a, VI-25-2b, VI-25-3
Description
Leaves, simple, petiolate, petiole not preserved along its entire
length, point of petiole attachment to lamina swollen, lamina
roundish-ovate, 7–11 cm long, 7–11 cm wide, apex bluntly acute,
basis strongly asymmetrical, shallowly cordate, venation actinodromous, three main veins, secondary venation brochidodromous,
main veins and secondary veins forming loops close to the leaf
margin, basal primary and secondary veins with abmedial veins,
these forming loops close to the leaf margin, tertiary veins branched
or percurrent, perpendicular to main, secondary, and abmedial
veins, leaf margin entire.
Remarks
The specimens in our material correspond to the type material
of the species from middle Miocene deposits of Öhningen.
Byttneriophyllum tiliifolium was a typical element of swamp
forests in the Neogene of western Eurasia (Worobiec et al.
2010) where it co-occurred with lignite forming conifers such
as Glyptostrobus and deciduous broadleaved angiosperms such
as Acer, Alnus, Betula, Cercidiphyllum, Populus, Salix and others
(Worobiec et al. 2010). According to Knobloch and Kvaček
(1965), Byttneriophyllum tiliifolium is an element of the ‘ArctoTertiary deciduous Turgay floral complex’ and migrated from
Northeast Asia to Europe via Siberia during the Cenozoic (see
also Zhilin 1989).
Order Cornales Link 1829
Family Nyssaceae Juss. ex Dumort. 1829
Genus Nyssa L. 1753
cf. Nyssa sibirica Dorof. 1963
Nyssa sibirica Dorof. – Dorofeev 1963, p. 237, pl. 41, figs 1–4
Nyssa sibirica Dorof. – Zhilin 1989, p. 267, figs 19A, B
Material examined – Shish 3043–33, 3043–34
Description
Endocarp, outline oblong, elliptic, ca. 7.5 mm long, 4 mm wide,
latitudinal grooves.
Remarks
The specimens at hand are covered by a thick layer of varnish and
hence difficult to observe. By their shape and size, however, we
tentatively refer them to Nyssa sibirica. This species was described
from Oligocene strata at the Kozyulino site near the confluence of
the Rivers Tom and Ob, (Zhilin 1989). In the Shish River site pollen
sample Nyssa is infrequent (1.4%).
Family Hydrangeaceae Dumort. 1829
Genus Hydrangea Gronov. 1753 s.l. (Platycrater Siebold &
Zucc. 1838)
Hydrangea (Platycrater) iljinskajae spec. nov.
(Figure 11(c))
Diagnosis
Leaf simple, pinnate, lamina size nothophyll, lamina elliptic, base
acute, apex acute to acuminate, secondary venation weak brochidodromous to eucamptodromous, apical part of secondary veins running parallel to leaf margin, margin sharply dentate, teeth awlshaped, distinctly acute, tertiary veins oblique to secondary and
intersecondary veins, percurrent or branched.
Holotype – Designated herewith, specimen 3043–11 Shish
Etymology – Referring to late palaeobotanist Irina Alekseevna
Iljinskaja (1921–2011)
Stratigraphy – Late Oligocene (Chattian), Zhuravka Horizon,
Turtas Formation
Type locality – Shish River, Omsk oblast, Russia
Material examined – Shish 3043–11
20
T. DENK ET AL.
Description
Leaf, simple, lamina elliptic, ca. 13 cm long, ca. 5 cm wide, base
acute, apex acute to acuminate (apical part of apex missing),
primary venation pinnate, secondary venation weak brochidodromous to eucamptodromous, with parallel and upturned secondary veins, upper parts of secondary veins running parallel with
margin and sending off small veinlets into the teeth, intersecondary veins present, tertiary veins percurrent or branched, in some
places approaching a reticulate pattern, oblique to secondary
veins, margin dentate, teeth small (ca. 1 mm), sharp, awlshaped, with straight to slightly convex basal sides and straight
to slightly concave apical sides, teeth oriented perpendicular to
leaf margin or apically.
Remarks
Tooth architecture is most similar to the extant Japanese shrub
species Platycrater arguta Siebold & Zucc. Recent molecular phylogenetic work has shown that Hydrangea is highly polyphyletic
(e.g. De Smet et al. 2015). According to Angiosperm Phylogeny
Website (http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/), ‘generic limits around Hydrangea were a mess – Platycrater and seven
other genera are embedded in Hydrangea s. str.’ However, although
these genera have been embedded within Hydrangea and a revised
sectional classification was provided (De Smet et al. 2015) some
authors prefer narrower generic limits based mainly on morphological and ecological grounds (Ohba and Akiyama 2016). Thus, we
here use the extended genus Hydrangea but indicate closest similarities with only a small fraction of the genus, the former genus
Platycrater, by indicating the old genus name in brackets for the
new fossil-species. The extant species P. arguta occurs in Japan and
China (Ohwi 1965; Wu and Raven 2001). In Japan it occurs at low
elevations (up to 500 m a.s.l.; GBIF, https://www.gbif.org/species/
7318947) while in China it occurs from 400 to 1800 m a.s.l. in sparse
forests or thickets in valleys, on stream banks and mountain slopes
(Wu and Raven 2001). Platycrater thrives under humid warm
temperate climates (Köppen-Geiger climate types Cfa and Cfb;
Kottek et al. 2006; Appendix 3).
Similar leaf remains have been reported from early Miocene
strata of Bohemia as Symplociphyllum hradekense Kvaček & Bůžek
(Kvaček and Bůžek 1966; Knobloch and Kvaček 1976). In this
species, the secondary veins are very similar to Hydrangea iljinskajae and send off small veinlets into the sharp teeth. However, the
teeth in Symplociphyllum commonly are more bristle-like than in
our species.
Incertae sedis
Fam., gen. et spec. indet 1
(Figure 12(b))
Material examined – Turtas 3043–10
Description
Leaf or leaflet, lamina ovate elliptic, 3.2 cm long, 1.7 cm wide, base
wide acute, apex acute, primary venation pinnate, secondary venation brochidodromous to semicraspedodromous, leaf margin serrate, teeth served by small veinlets departing from loops of
secondary veins, teeth rosoid.
Remarks
The single specimen at hand resembles leaflets of the family
Rosaceae; particularly as found in the genus Rosa.
Fam., gen. et spec. indet 2
(Figure 12(c))
Material examined – Kizak 9187–25/1
Description
Apical leaf fragment, 2 cm long, 1 cm wide, representing the acute
apical part of a leaf or lobe of a leaf, secondary venation semicraspedodromous, margin simple dentate, teeth with long straight basal
side, and short apical side.
Remarks
The single specimen at hand is too fragmentary for a meaningful
taxonomic assessment.
Discussion
Taxonomic composition, palaeoenvironments, taphonomy
The majority of macrofossils recovered from the four sites represent
riparian, swamp and aquatic communities (Table 1). From the
Bicha River site, only four taxa are known, comprising Salix,
Pterocarya, Juglans and Byttneriophyllum. This is indicating
a lakeshore or riparian vegetation possibly exposed to temporal
flooding (Salix). The Turtas River assemblage comprises reed
(Phragmites) and aquatic plants (Hemitrapa) together with riparian
elements (Alnus, Byttneriophyllum, Pterocarya, cf. Rosa/Rubus).
The Kizak River site is more diverse and comprises reed plants
such as Phragmites and Typha, aquatic plants (Salvinia), and riparian and swamp forest elements such as Byttneriophyllum, Salix, and
Populus glandulifera. In addition, some taxa might have formed
part of well-drained stands behind the riparian vegetation (Ulmus,
Quercus pseudocastanea and Carpinus grandis). The Shish River site
represents two-thirds of all the studied specimens and is dominated
by Populus latior. This riparian element is joined by P. balsamoides,
Nyssa and Liquidambar. Alnus julianiformis might have also been
part of this riparian vegetation but likely also formed part of the
zonal vegetation further away from the lake (Kvaček and Holý
1974). Aquatic plants from this site (Nelumbo, Hemitrapa) indicate
a lake. Nelumbo protospeciosa is only known from this site and is
a western Siberian Miocene endemic species according to Wang
(2012). The Shish River site also yielded plants attributable to the
zonal hinterland vegetation. Besides Alnus julianiformis, Quercus
kubinyii and the newly described Platycrater iljinskajae may have
been part of the hinterland vegetation as well.
In general, the leaf and fruit assemblages of all four sites are
dominated by riparian and aquatic elements suggestive of communities in and adjacent to a large water body. This suggests
a taphonomic filter as would be expected for leaf fossils (cf.
Bouchal et al. 2020). For example, whereas poplar leaves are the
most abundant element among our plant fossils, Alnus julianiformis, Carpinus, and Platycrater are represented by few or single
leaves, suggesting transport from a distant source. In case of
Carpinus, the poor state of preservation suggests transport from
further away. The Shish River site is most diverse in plant macrofossils and differs from the other three locations by the high number
of Populus latior leaves and the presence of Platycrater iljinsjkayae.
Byttneriophyllum is shared by the Kizak, Bicha and Turtas River
sites. Among these sites, only Kizak is fairly rich in species and is
distinguished from all other sites by the moderate abundance of
Ulmus pyramidalis and Q. pseudocastanea leaves.
The palynoflora from the leaf-bearing layer of the Shish River
site is dominated by woody gymnosperms and angiosperms (55.4%
and 36.4%, respectively). Spore producing plants (6.4%) and
HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
herbaceous angiosperms (1.8%) are less common (Appendix 2). In
general, the palynoflora is much more diverse than the leaf assemblage and captures a more diverse vegetation surrounding the
palaeolake (Table 2). Most eye-catching is the high abundance
and diversity of conifers (needleleaf evergreen and deciduous
biomes according to Woodward et al. 2004), which comprise both
Cupressaceae (25.8%) and Pinaceae (29.6%; Table 3). It is remarkable, that the macrofossil record is almost void of conifer leaves and
reproductive structures, whereas conifers are the most prominent
elements in the pollen record (Tables 1–3, Appendix 2).
Some of these are typical elements of waterlogged habitats,
whereas others are typically growing on well-drained soils (e.g.
Larix, Abies). Hence, some relief is to be expected for the source
area of the recovered plant fossils. This relief might have corresponded to a mosaic of lowland swamps with peat formation,
floodplains, natural levees, and hammocks (Ferguson et al. 1999).
Among angiosperms (broadleaf deciduous biome of Woodward
et al. 2004), riparian elements are well-represented. These were
typical elements of lowland forests dominated by Quercus and
Juglandaceae. Typical streamside plants (Liquidambar, Nyssa)
may have been interspersed in these forests as well. Finally, welldrained areas were covered by mixed broadleaf forests and mixed
broadleaf and conifer forests. These contained Fagus, Eucommia,
Carpinus, Betula, Corylus, Quercus sect. Cerris, and very likely
Quercus sect. Quercus (Table 2). The biomes recognised in the
present study correspond closely to the forest assemblages recognised for the Oligocene to early Miocene in Western Siberia based
on carpological data (Nikitin 2006; Popova et al. 2019a) and based
on palynological data (Arkhipov et al. 2005; Volkova et al. 2016).
Age constraints provided by leaf fossils
It is difficult to establish the precise age of the four leaf assemblages
described here. However, building on the work by Zhilin (1974,
1989)), a rough stratigraphic framework – bearing in mind that
several of the ‘Aquitanian’ leaf assemblages from the North Ustyurt
and North Aral regions actually may be Chattian (see Material and
Methods section) – can be suggested. For example, according to
Zhilin (1989), three fossil-species, Eucommia palaeoulmoides, Alnus
feroniae, and Juglans zaisanica existed in western Kazakhstan only
during the early Miocene (Aquitanian) and Byttneriophyllum (as
Alangium) existed north of the Aral Sea during the Aquitanian (the
localities from which Byttneriophyllum has been reported are of
Chattian age in the revised stratigraphic framework as outlined
above). While Eucommia is part of the palynoflora of Shish, the
other three species are part of the leaf assemblage. Among species,
confined to the late Oligocene to early Miocene in western
Kazakhstan, Zhilin (1989) lists Fagus antipofii, and among those
ranging from early Oligocene to the beginning of the early Miocene,
Nelumbo protospeciosa, Liquidambar europaea, Populus balsamoides, and Pterocarya paradisiaca are part of the leaf assemblages
described here.
In case of Quercus pseudocastanea that is part of the Kizak River
site, we note that this species is confined to middle Miocene to late
Pliocene floras in Europe (Walther and Zastawniak 1991). In contrast, oldest fossils that might belong to Quercus pseudocastanea are
from late Oligocene deposits of Ashutas (northeastern Kazakhstan;
Kryshtofovich et al. 1956; Iljinskaya 1982). Quercus pseudocastanea
has also been reported from early Miocene deposits of western
Siberia (Kozhevnikovo, Tomsk oblast; Yakubovskaya 1957).
Macrofloras with lobed oaks most likely belonging to Quercus
sect. Quercus also occur in the early Oligocene of Kiin Kerish
(Iljinskaya 1991) with forms resembling the East Asian Q. serrata
(sect. Quercus) and the early Oligocene of the Far East (Denk et al.
21
2017). The other Quercus species in our material, Q. kubinyii from
the Shish River site, clearly belongs to a lineage of Quercus sect.
Cerris that commenced in Northeast Asia during early Oligocene
and possibly Eocene times (Pavlyutkin 2015; Denk et al. 2017;
Naryshkina and Evstigneeva 2020). This species is not known
from Europe prior to the Miocene (Teodoridis and Kvaček 2006).
Early Miocene leaf types described as Q. kuschukensis (Kornilova
1960; Iljinskaya 1982) from northern Kazakhstan may partly belong
to this species but would need to be reinvestigated.
In general, when considering leaf fossils greatest similarities of
the four localities investigated in this study are with leaf floras of
northern Kazakhstan and Southwestern Siberia that have variously
been assigned to early Miocene or late Oligocene (Gorbunov 1957;
Yakubovskaya 1957; Zhilin 1974, 1989, 2001) and less so with late
Oligocene floras (e.g. Kumsuat; Zhilin 1989). In view of the revised
stratigraphy of strata from the North Ustyurt and North Aral
regions previously believed to be Aquitanian by Zhilin (1989) but
currently considered late Oligocene, it is difficult to make the
distinction between Chattian and Aquitanian based on the present
leaf material. However, considering that the Shish River site is
Chattian in age based on its spore and pollen assemblage (see
below) and the Turtas River site is located close to palynological
sections that are dated as Chattian as well (Volkova et al. 2016), we
consider these macrofossil sites to be of late Oligocene age. Nearby
palynological sections are also available for the Kizak River site (see
Masali section in Kuz’mina et al. 2019). The spore-pollen assemblage from this section is dominated by Chlorophyta and
Betulaceae along with Pinaceae and moderate amounts of herbaceous taxa and is considered to be late Miocene in age. This age can
be ruled out for the Kizak River site leaf assemblage, but the
abundant leaves of Quercus pseudocastanea and Ulmus pyramidalis
plus the rare occurrence of Betula make this site distinct from the
other leaf sites studied. This leaf assemblage might correspond to
the Alnus-Betula-Quercus sibirica-Ulmus crassa spore-pollen
assemblage of Volkova et al. (2016), which corresponds to the
lower Abrosimovka Formation (Figure 3). It is noteworthy that
marked similarities are also with middle Miocene leaf floras of
Eastern Europe (Kutuzkina 1964; Ilyinskaya 1968) although the
latter are much more diverse.
Age constraints provided by dispersed spores and pollen
A more precise stratigraphic framework can be proposed for the
Shish River site based on the composition and abundance of the
investigated palynoflora (Table 3; Appendix 2). Arkhipov et al.
(2005) reviewed the Paleogene and Neogene vegetation history of
Western Siberia using palynological data. We found a close correlation with the pollen flora from the Shish River locality investigated
in the present study and the palynocomplex of the Turtas
Formation (Turtasskaya suite) coinciding with the late Oligocene
Turtas Lake. The upper Oligocene Zhuravka Horizon (including
the Turtas and Zhuravka formations is characterised by local pollen
assemblages in which taxodiaceous (papillate) Cupressaceae and
Pinaceae dominate. In addition, Fagaceae pollen (Quercus, Fagus)
dominate among angiosperms along with Juglandaceae and
Betulaceae. As newly arriving taxa, warm temperate elements such
as Liquidambar, Ilex, Nyssa, and Symplocaceae are mentioned
(Arkhipov et al. 2005).
A number of palynological investigations provide further information, which helps constraining the age of the Shish River site.
From the stratotype horizon of the Zhuravka Horizon (including
the Zhuravka and Turtas formations; Zashchitino Village, north of
Tobolsk, Figure 1(a)), Volkova et al. (2016) described
a palynological section that shows similar ratios of spores,
22
T. DENK ET AL.
gymnosperms, and angiosperms with the Shish River locality. It
also shares the high proportions of Pinaceae and taxodiaceous
(papillate) Cupressaceae and very low abundance of herbaceous
angiosperms. However, Fagaceae, which are common both in the
macrofossil record and pollen record of the Shish River site, are rare
in the Zashchitino profile. Similar results were reported by
Oreshkina et al. (2020), who investigated palynomorphs from borehole Zyryanskaya-1 belonging to the Turtas Formation in the
southwestern part of the Tyumen Region. Here, gymnosperms
reached up to 85–90%, Juglandaceae are prominent among angiosperms, while Fagaceae are entirely missing. Hence, the assemblage
of pollen and spores differs from other assemblages of the Turtas
and Zhuravka formations by the low amounts of papillate
Cupressaceae and the absence of Fagaceae. Oreshkina et al. (2020)
explained this deviation from the common pattern by regional
environmental differences and/or different levels of transgressions
during the late Oligocene. Additional sections from boreholes
including early Oligocene to middle Miocene layers were investigated from the region south of Omsk (Figure 1(g,h); Kuzmina and
Volkova 2001, 2008). For the early Oligocene strata, we note similarities in the pollen spectra of Pinaceae and taxodiaceous (papillate) Cupressaceae, as well as the low percentages of herbaceous
angiosperms. A significant difference of the early Oligocene pollen
assemblages with the Shish River locality is the presence of extinct
Fagaceae (‘Quercus’ gracilis and ‘Q.’ graciliformis), which are typical
of Eocene and early Oligocene deposits across Eurasia and absent
from the Shish River site (Figure 13). Likewise, early Miocene
deposits of the Beshcheul Formation, also similar in taxonomic
composition with the Shish River site, differ considerably in the
proportion of key taxonomic groups. Late early and early middle
Miocene spore-pollen assemblages contain considerable amounts
of Polypodiaceae and Alnus and moderate abundance of herbaceous angiosperms. In contrast, late Oligocene and early Miocene
assemblages are more similar to the Shish River site assemblage,
both in terms of the frequency of spores, gymnosperms, and angiosperms, as well as in the proportions of key taxonomic groups
(Pinaceae, taxodiaceous/papillate Cupressaceae, woody angiosperms with prominent Quercus and Fagus, low proportion of herbaceous angiosperms). This corresponds to the ‘Quercus sibiricaFagus grandifoliiformis-Pinaceae’ palynoassemblage (Kuz’mina and
Volkova 2008). Further high similarities are encountered between
the Shish River site palynoflora and the assemblages from borehole
8 close to the border with Kazakhstan (Gnibidenko et al. 2011;
Figure 1(b)). Here, the assemblages of the Zhuravka Formation
are nearly identical with the assemblage of the Shish River locality,
whereas the younger ones from the early Miocene Beshcheul
Formation differ markedly by higher amounts of herbaceous
angiosperms. Popova et al. (2019b) described a palynoflora from
Kumyrtas, central Kazakhstan, characterised by high percentages of
Betula (ca. 30%) and Fagus (ca. 15%) along with abundant
Pterocarya (7.5%). The age of this flora was considered
Aquitanian based on floristic similarity with the Nausha (leaf)
flora (southern Kostanay Region). The Nausha flora, in turn, had
been dated as Aquitanian by the occurrence of the genus
Paraceratherium and by correlation with marine molluscs from
the northern Ustyurt Plateau to the west (Zhilin 1989). It remains
unclear to us how the Kumyrtas (fruits and seeds, and spore-pollen)
assemblage was correlated with the Nausha (leaf) assemblage, but if
this correlation is correct, the age of the Kumyrtas assemblage
should be Chattian in view of the revised stratigraphy of the
North Ustyurt and North Aral region based on marine molluscs,
micromammals and the Paraceratherium stratigraphic range (see
Material and Methods section). The pollen record would indicate
that this assemblage belongs to the Pterocarya stenopteroides-Fagus
grandifoliiformis pollen zone (Kuz’mina and Volkova 2008;
Gnibidenko et al. 2011). The spore and pollen assemblage reported
by Popova et al. (2019b) differs from the one reported here from the
Shish locality; Quercus is diverse and moderately abundant in Shish
but absent in the Kumyrtas flora (a single grain identified as
Quercus and figured in Popova et al. 2019b, belongs to Fagus).
Betula and Pterocarya are much less abundant at Shish.
Finally, we compared the Shish River site palynoassemblage with
three sections belonging to the late Miocene Ishim Formation (Figure 1
(d–f); Kuz’mina et al. 2019). These assemblages are either dominated by
spores and non-pollen palynomorphs, or by Pinaceae and Betulaceae;
Fagus and Quercus are absent or occur with single pollen grains.
In conclusion, there is strong evidence that the Shish River site
spore-pollen assemblage corresponds to the late Oligocene
(Chattian) ‘Quercus sibirica- Fagus grandifoliiformis-Pinaceae’ palynoassemblage (Kuz’mina and Volkova 2008; Volkova et al. 2016;
Figure 3). This age determination would be consistent with evidence from the macro flora of the Shish River site (see above).
Palaeobiogeography
A number of major palaeobiogeographical patterns emerge from
our study of these Southwestern Siberian plant assemblages. The
role of Southwestern Siberia and adjacent Kazakhstan appears to
have been fourfold: First, it was a stopover for plant lineages
migrating from East Asia (and western North America) to
Europe. Second, it may have been the point of origin for new species
that subsequently migrated to Europe. Third, it had a number of
endemic species. Fourth, a few species and lineages might have
arrived from the west, where they have older records than in
Southwestern Siberia. The first pattern is seen in Nelumbo protospeciosa that existed in Northeast Asia during the Eocene, from
where it migrated to Central Asia. Records from the Zaysan depression (Iljinskaya 1986) and western Kazakhstan (Zhilin 1989) suggest it existed there during the middle Eocene to early Miocene
(Aquitanian). In Europe and the Mediterranean region, this species
appears in the late Oligocene. The earliest records of Liquidambar
are from the Eocene of western North America and East Asia
(Manchester 1999). Liquidambar europaea was recorded from late
Eocene to Aquitanian strata in the Zaysan depression and western
Kazakhstan (Iljinskaya 1986; Zhilin 1989). In Europe, this species is
known from early Oligocene strata (Walther and Eichler 2010).
Similar patterns of westward migrations are found in Eucommia
palaeoulmioides (Zhilin 1989; Mai 1995), Ulmus pyramidalis (commonly as U. longifolia; Iljinskaya 1986; Zhilin 1989; Denk and
Dillhoff 2005; Walther and Eichler 2010) and in Byttneriophyllum
tiliifolium (Central Asian records as Alangium tiliifolium; Knobloch
and Kvaček 1964; Zhilin 1989). Ulmus and Byttneriophyllum appear
to have restricted stratigraphical ranges in eastern and western
Kazakhstan (Aquitanian). A last example of this pattern is found
in Quercus kubinyii. Leaf morphologies very similar to this species
are known from early Oligocene strata in the Russian Far East
(Pavlyutkin 2015) and similar leaf morphologies existed in
Aquitanian strata of Central Asia (as Q. kushukensis, Q. cf. castaneifolia; Zhilin 1989). Quercus kubinyii existed in western Eurasia
since the Burdigalian (Teodoridis and Kvaček 2006).
The second pattern, a likely origin of fossil-taxa in Central Asia
with subsequent migration to Europe, is seen in Quercus pseudocastanea (Iljinskaya 1982), and in Pterocarya paradisiaca, Juglans
zaisanica, Alnus julianiformis (commonly as Alnus feroniae),
Populus balsamoides, and Populus latior, which mainly existed in
northern Kazakhstan from the late Oligocene to the Aquitanian
with a later arrival in Europe (Kvaček and Holý 1974; Iljinskaya
1986; Zhilin 1989; Walther and Eichler 2010).
HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
23
Figure 13. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and light microscopy (LM) micrographs of dispersed Fagaceae pollen from the Shish River site. a–c, Fagus subgen. Fagus
sp., same grain, (a, c) PV, (b) exine detail. d–g, Quercus subgen. Cerris sect. Cerris, (d, f, g top) same grain, (d, g top) PV, (f) exine detail, (e, g bottom) EV. h–j, Quercus subgen.
Quercus sect. Protobalanus, (h, j) EV, (i) exine detail. k–m, Quercus subgen. Quercus sect. Quercus, (k, m) EV, (l) exine detail. SEM (a, b, d, e, f, h, i, k, l), LM (c, g, j, m). PV = polar
view; EV = equatorial view. Scale bar 10 μm (a, c, d, e, g, h, j, k, m) and 2 μm (b, f, i, l).
24
T. DENK ET AL.
The third pattern, endemic fossil-taxa in the northern Kazakh
and Southwestern Siberian records, is represented by Hemitrapa
praeconocarpa (Wang 2012), Nyssa sibirica (Zhilin 1989), and
potentially by Platycrater iljinskajae, all of which show
a stratigraphic range from late Oligocene to early Miocene as well.
Finally, a few fossil-taxa in our collection have an older fossil record
in Europe than in Kazakhstan and Southwestern Siberia. Among these,
Carpinus grandis existed during the early Oligocene in Central Europe
(Walther and Eichler 2010), while Quercus section Protobalanus had
a highly complex biogeographic history. Today, the golden cup oaks,
Quercus sect. Protobalanus comprise a few species in western North
America (Denk et al. 2017) but recent palaeobotanical discoveries
showed that this geographically restricted group had a much wider
distribution during the Cenozoic. Oldest fossils of sect. Protobalanus
are known from the middle Eocene of western Greenland (Grímsson
et al. 2015). During the latest Eocene and early Oligocene, this group
was present in Colorado and New Jersey (Bouchal et al. 2014; Prader
et al. 2020) and staminate flowers with in situ pollen from the late
Eocene Baltic Amber deposits of Northern Europe (Sadowski et al.
2020) suggest crossing of the North Atlantic during the Paleogene.
The finding of Quercus sect. Protobalanus in the Shish River pollen
assemblage is the first record of this taxon from Asia and suggests
range expansion across the temperate parts of Eurasia during the
Paleogene.
These time-transgressive migrations suggest that purely biostratigraphic correlations will only work at relatively local geographic
scales given plant migration over time. Further, such correlations
need to be based upon careful analysis of the taxa involved, including re-investigation of existing published fossil records to detect
actual biogeographic patterns (e.g., in the context of the present
study, recognising the conspecific nature of Byttneriophullum tiliifolium with ‘Alangium’ tiliifolium and Alnus julianiformis with
A. feroniae). In order to fully understand patterns of migration
and endemism during different periods and in different parts of
northern Eurasia, the palynological and leaf records need to be
combined and ‘standard floras’ in the sense of Zhilin (1989) dated
by marine molluscs or terrestrial mammals need to be used to
achieve reliable stratigraphic frameworks.
Acknowledgments
We thank the curators of the palaeontological collections at the “Regional
Tyumen Museum Complex named after Ivan Slovtsov” for making this collection
available and Aleksandra Olokhova for preparing photographs of plant fossil
specimens. TD acknowledges financial support through the Swedish Research
Council (VR, project no. 2015-03986).
This study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher education of the
Russian Federation and was performed as a part of project FEWZ-2020-0007
“Fundamentals of the natural environment history of the south of Western Siberia
and Turgay in the Cenozoic: sequence sedimentology, abiotic geological events and
the evolution of the Paleobiosphere“. The investigations were carried out using the
equipment of the Center for Collective Use “Bioinert Systems of the Cryosphere”,
Tyumen Scientific Center, SB RAS. Valuable comments by Christa Charlotte
Hoffman and an anonymous reviewer helped improving the final manuscript.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Funding
This work was supported by the Vetenskapsrådet [grant 2015-03986 to TD].
ORCID
Thomas Denk
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9535-1206
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4241-9075
Johannes Martin Bouchal
Pavel Smirnov
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2264-2269
References
Arkhipov SA, Volkova VS, Zolnikov ID, Zykina VS, Krukover AA, Kul’kova LA.
2005. West Siberia. In: Velichko AA, Nechaev VP, editors. Cenozoic climatic
and environmental changes in Russia. Geological Society of America Special
Paper 382. Boulder (Colo.): Geological Society of America; p. 67–88.
Baranov VI. 1954. Stages of development of flora and vegetation of the USSR in
the Tertiary period. Part 3. Results of studying fossil Tertiary floras and
problems of relicts in modern vegetation of the USSR. Scientific notes of
the V.I. Ulianov-Lenin Kazan’ State University. Book 4. Kazan; 364 p. [In
Russian] Ser. Botany. 114:.
Bendukidze OG, de Bruijn H, van den Hoek Ostende LW. 2009. A revision of
Late Oligocene associations of small mammals from the Aral Formation
(Kazakhstan) in the National Museum in Georgia, Tbilissi. Palaeodiversitas.
2:343–377.
Boitsova EP, Panova LA. 1973. Correlation of Oligocene deposits in the North
Ustyurt, Northern Aral Region, Turgai Plain, and West Siberian Plain (from
palynological data), in Marine and Continental Paleogene of Siberia.
Novosibirsk: Nauka; p. 78–86. [In Russian]
Bouchal J, Zetter R, Grímsson F, Denk T. 2014. Evolutionary trends and
ecological differentiation in early Cenozoic Fagaceae of western North
America. Am J Bot. 101:1332–1349.
Bouchal JM, Güner HT, Velitzelos D, Velitzelos E, Denk T. 2020. Messinian
vegetation and climate of the intermontane Florina-Ptolemais-Servia Basin,
NW Greece inferred from palaeobotanical data: how well do plant fossils
reflect past environments? Royal Soc Open Sci. 7:192067. doi:10.1098/
rsos.192067
Braun A. 1845. Die Tertiär-Flora von Öhningen. Neues Jahrb Min Geogn Geol.
1845:164–174.
Brongniart A. 1822. Sur la classification et la distribution des végétaux fossiles en
général, et sur ceux des terrains de sédiment supérieur en particulier. Mém
Mus Natl Hist Nat, Sér C Géol. 8:203–240.
Bruckmann AE. 1849. Flora oeningensis fossilis. Die Oeninger Steinbrüche, das
Sammeln in denselben und die bis jetzt dort gefundenen Pflanzenreste.
Jahresh Ver Naturk Württemberg. 5:215–238.
Buckland W. 1836. Geology and mineralogy considered with reference to
natural theology, Vol. 1. London: William Pickering.
Budantsev LV. 1960. The water chestnuts (Trapa and Hemitrapa) from the
Tertiary deposits of the southeastern Baikal coast. Bot J. 45: 139–144. [In
Russian].
Budantsev LY. 1997. Late Eocene flora of western Kamchatka. St. Petersburg:
Russian Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the Komarov Botanical
Institute; p. 19. [In Russian]
Bůžek C, Holý F, Kvaček Z. 1996. Early Miocene flora of the Cypris shale
(Western Bohemia). Acta Mus Nat Pragae, Ser B Hist Nat. 52(1–4):1–72.
Christensen EF. 1976. The Søby-flora: fossil plants from the deltaic deposits of
the Søby-Fasterholt area, central Jutland, Denmark. Part 2. Danmarks Geol
Unders, Ser. 2. 108:1–49.
Cushing EJ. 1967. Evidence for differential pollen preservation in late
Quaternary sediments in Minnesota. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 4:87–101.
Czeczott H. 1951. Środkowo-mioceńska flora Zalesieckoło Wiśniowca I. Acta
Geol Polon. 2:349–445.
De Smet Y, Granados-Mendoza C, Wanke S, Goetghebeur P, Samain M-S. 2015.
Molecular phylogenetics and new (infra)generic classification to alleviate
polyphyly in tribe Hydrangeeae (Cornales: hydrangeaceae). Taxon.
64:741–753.
Denk T, Dillhoff RM. 2005. Ulmus leaves and fruits from the Early–Middle
Eocene of northwestern North America: systematics and implications for
character evolution within Ulmaceae. Canadian J Bot. 83:1663–1681.
Denk T, Grimm GW. 2009a. The biogeographic history of beech trees. Rev
Palaeobot Palynol. 158:83–100.
Denk T, Grimm GW. 2009b. Significance of pollen characteristics for infrageneric classification and phylogeny in Quercus (Fagaceae). Int J Plant Sci.
170:926–940.
Denk T, Grimm GW, Manos PS, Deng M, Hipp A. 2017. An updated infrageneric classification of the oaks: review of previous taxonomic schemes and
synthesis of evolutionary patterns. In: Gil-Peregrin E, Peguero-Pina JJ,
Sancho-Knapik D, editors. Oaks Physiological Ecology. Exploring the
Functional Diversity of Genus Quercus. Tree Physiology 7. Cham
(Switzerland): Springer Nature; p. 13–38.
Denk T, Güner HT, Bouchal JM, Kallanxhi M-E. 2019. The Pleistocene flora of
Bezhan, southeast Albania: early appearance of extant tree species. Hist Biol.
doi:10.1080/08912963.2019.1615061
HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
Dolezych M, Schneider W. 2006. Inkohlte Hölzer und Cuticulae dispersae aus dem 2.
Miozänen Flözhorizont im Tagebau Welzow (Lausitz) – taxonomie und vergleichende feinstratigraphisch-fazielle Zuordnung. Z Geol Wiss. 34:165–259.
Dolezych M, Schneider W. 2007. Taxonomie und Taphonomie von
Koniferenhölzern und Cuticulae dispersae im 2. Lausitzer Flözhorizont
(Miozän) des Senftenberger Reviers. Palaeontograph B. 276:1–95.
Dolezych M, Schneider W. 2012. Fossil conifers in peat bog environments –
results from the Central European Neogene. Japan J Palynol. 58(Special
Issue):48.
Dorofeev PI. 1963. Tertiary floras of Western Siberia. Moscow (Leningrad):
Academy of Sciences of the USSR; p. 346. [In Russian]
Doweld AB. 2017. Nomenclatural novelties and taxonomic changes for extant
and fossil Populus (Salicaceae). Kew Bull. 72:46.
Ettingshausen von C. 1852. Fossile Pflanzenreste aus dem trachytischen Sandstein
von Heiligenkreuz bei Kremnitz. Abh geol Reichsanst Wien. 1:1–14.
Ettingshausen von C. 1853. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der fossilen Flora von Tokay.
Sitz-Ber Akad Wiss Wien. 11:779–816.
Feng XX, Jin JH. 2012. First record of extinct fruit genus Chaneya in low-latitude
tropic of South China. Sci China Earth Sci. 55:728–732.
Ferguson DK, Hofmann C-C DT. 1999. Taphonomy: field techniques in modem
environments. In: Jones TP, Rowe NP, editors. Fossil Plants and Spores:
modern techniques. London: Geological Society; p. 210–213.
Gnibidenko ZN. 2007. Late Cenozoic paleomagnetism of West Siberian Plate.
Russian Geol Geophys. 48:337–348.
Gnibidenko ZN, Levicheva AV, Semakov NN. 2014. Paleomagnetism of the
Paleogene–Neogene continental sediments of the Om’ basin (southern
West Siberia). Russian Geol Geophys. 55:881–891.
Gnibidenko ZN, Volkova VS, Kuz’mina OB, Dolya ZA, Khazina IV,
Levicheva AV. 2011. Stratigraphic, paleomagnetic, and palynological data
on the Paleogene–Neogene continental deposits of southwestern West
Siberia. Russian Geol Geophys. 52:466–473(586–605).
Göppert HR. 1852. Ueber die Braunkohlefloren des nordöstlichen Deutschlands.
Zeitschr deutsch Geol Ges. 4:484–496.
Göppert HR. 1855. Die tertiaere Flora von Schossnitz in Schlesien. Görlitz:
Heyn’sche Buchhandlung (E. Remer.).
Gorbunov MG. 1957. O novom mestonakhozhdenii tretichnoy flory na reke
Tym. [About the new locality of Tertiary flora on river Tym]. Uchenye
Zapiski Tomskogo Universiteta. 7: 44–56. [In Russian].
Grímsson F, Zetter R, Grimm GW, Pedersen GK, Pedersen AK, Denk T. 2015.
Fagaceae pollen from the early Cenozoic of West Greenland: revisiting
Engler’s and Chaney’s Arcto-Tertiary hypotheses. Plant Syst Evol.
301:809–832.
Güner TH, Bouchal JM, Köse N, Göktas F, Mayda S, Denk T. 2017. Landscape
heterogeneity in the Yatağan Basin (southwestern Turkey) during the middle
Miocene inferred from plant macrofossils. Palaeontographica B. 296
(1–6):113–171.
Halbritter H, Ulrich S, Grímsson F, Weber M, Zetter R, Hesse M, Buchner R,
Svojtka M, Frosch-Radivo A. 2018. Illustrated Pollen Terminology. 2nd ed.
Cham (Switzerland): Springer Nature.
Hantke R. 1954. Die fossile Flora der obermiozänen Oehninger-Fundstelle
Schrotzburg (Schienerberg, Süd-Baden). Denkschr Schweiz Naturforsch
Ges. 80:27–118.
Heer O. 1855. Die tertiäre Flora der Schweiz. Flora Tertiaria Helvetiae, Vol. 1.
Winterthur: Verlag Wurster & Co.
Heer O. 1856. Die tertiäre Flora der Schweiz. Flora Tertiaria Helvetiae, Vol. 2.
pp. 1–110 (Verlag Wurster & Co.) Winterthur.
Heer O. 1859. Die tertiäre Flora der Schweiz. Flora Tertiaria Helvetiae, Vol. 3.
Winterthur: Verlag Wurster & Co.
Hofmann CC, Kodrul TM, Liu XY, Jin JH. 2019. Scanning electron microscopy
investigations of middle to late Eocene pollen from the Changchang Basin
(Hainan Island, South China) - insights into the paleobiogeography and fossil
history of Juglans, Fagus, Lagerstroemia, Mortoniodendron, Cornus, Nyssa,
Symplocos and some Icacinaceae in SE Asia. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 265:41–61.
Iljinskaya IA. 1968. Neogene floras of the Transcarpathian region of the USSR.
Leningrad: Academy of Sciences of the USSR; p. 122. [In Russian]
Iljinskaya IA. 1982. Fagus L. In: Takhtajan AL, editor. Fossil flowering plants
of Russia and adjacent states. Vol. 2 Ulmaceae–Betulaceae. Leningrad:
Komarov Botanical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the USSR; p.
60–73. [In Russian].
Iljinskaya IA. 1986. Izmenenie flory zaisanskoy vpadiny s kontsa mela po
miotsen. [Changes in the flora of the Zaysan depression from the end of
the Cretaceous to Miocene]. In: Takhtajan AL, editor. Problemy paleobotaniki [Problems in Palaeobotany]. Leningrad: academy of Sciences of the
USSR. [In Russian]; p. 84–112.
Iljinskaya IA. 1991. Interrelations of the early Oligocene flora of the Kiin-Kerish
Mountain with the modern flora. Formation of the Eocene-Miocene Flora of
Kazakhstan and the Russian Plain. Proceedings of Kryshtofovich Readings.
2:15–36.
25
Iljinskaja IA. 1994. Pterocarya Kunth. In: Budantsev L, editor. Fossil flowering
plants of Russia and adjacent states. Vol. 3 Leitneriaceae–Juglandaceae.
St. Petersburg: Komarov Botanical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences;
p. 52–68. [In Russian].
Jarmolenko AV. 1935. The Upper Cretaceous flora of the North-Western
Kara-tau. Trudy Sredne-Aziatskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Serija
8b Botanika. 28: 1–36. [In Russian].
Knobloch E. 1964. Haben Cinnamomum scheuchzeri Heer und Cinnamomum
polymorphum (A.Braun) Heer nomenklatorisch richtige Namen? Neues
Jahrb Geol Paläont Monatsh. 10:597–603.
Knobloch E. 1968. Bemerkungen zur Nomenklatur Tertiärer Pflanzenreste.
Sborník Národního Muzea V Praze, Řada B – Přírodní Vědy. 24:121–152.
Knobloch E. 1969. Tertiäre Floren von Mähren. Brno: Moravské Muzeum and
Musejni Spolek; p. 201.
Knobloch E, Kvaček Z. 1965. Byttneriophyllum tiliaefolium (Al. Braun)
Knobloch et Kvaček in den tertiären Floren der Nordhalbkugel. Sborník
Geologických Věd, Paleontologie. 5:123–166.
Knobloch E, Kvaček Z. 1976. Miozäne Blätterfloren vom Westrand der
Böhmischen Masse. Rozpravy Ústøedního Ústavu Geologického. 42:1–131.
Kolakovsky AA. 1964. The Pliocene flora of Kodor. Sukhumi Bot Gard Monogr.
1:1–200.
Kornilova VS. 1960. Early Miocene flora of Kushuk. Alma-Ata: Academy of
Sciences of the Kazakh SSR; p. 170. [In Russian]
Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B, Rubel F. 2006. Worldmap of the KöppenGeiger climate classification updated. Meteorol Zeitschr. 15:259–263.
Kováts J. 1856. Fossile Flora von Erdőbénye. Arbeiten Geol Gesellsch Ungarns.
1:1–38.
Kryshtofovich AN, Baikovskaya TN. 1965. The Sarmatian flora of Krynka.
Moscow (Leningrad): Academy of Sciences of the USSR; p. 1–123. [In
Russian]
Kryshtofovich AN, Borsuk M. 1939. Contribution to the Miocene flora from the
Western Siberia. Probl Paleont. 5: 375–394. [In Russian].
Kryshtofovich AN, Palibin IV, Shaparenko KK, Yarmolenko AV,
Baykovskaya TN, Grubov VI, Iljinskaya IA. 1956. Oligocene flora of
Ashutas Mountain in Kazakhstan. Proceedings of the Botanical Institute of
the Academy of Sciences USSR, Ser. 8. Paleobotany. 1: 1–179. [In Russian].
Kutuzkina EF. 1964. The Sarmatian flora of Armavir. Proceedings of the
Botanical Institute of the Academy of Sciences USSR, Ser. 8. Paleobotany.
5: 147–229. [In Russian].
Kuz’mina OB, Volkova VS. 2001. Stratigraphy and palynological characterization of Oligocene–Miocene deposits from drilling materials (borehole 01-BP)
in the Omsk Irtysh region of West Siberia. News of Paleontology and
Stratigraphy. Suppl to Russian Geol Geophys. 42: 135–141. [In Russian].
Kuz’mina OB, Volkova VS. 2008. Palynostratigraphy of Oligocene–Miocene
continental deposits in southwestern Siberia. Stratigr Geol Correl.
16:540–552.
Kuz’mina OB, Khazina IV, Smirnov PV, Konstantinov AO, Agatova AR. 2019.
Palynological profile and depositional environment of the Ishim Formation
(upper Miocene) in Tobol-Ishim interfluve, Western Siberia. Stratigr Geol
Correl. 27:707–727.
Kvaček Z, Bůžek C. 1966. Einige interessante Lauraceen und Symplocaceen des
nordböhmischen Tertiärs. Věstník Ústředního Ústavu Geologického.
41:291–294.
Kvaček Z, Holý F. 1974. Alnus julianaeformis (Sternberg 1823) comb. nov.,
a noteworthy Neogene alder.. Časopis Pro Mineralogii a Geologii.
19:367–372.
Kvaček Z, Velitzelos D, Velitzelos E. 2002. Late Miocene flora of Vegora,
Macedonia, N. Greece. Athens (Greece): Korali Publications; p. 175.
Lai YJ, Li SJ, Wang WM. 2018. Evolutionary trends in leaf morphology and
biogeography of Altingiaceae based on fossil evidence. Palaeoworld. 27:415–422.
Latham RE, Ricklefs RE. 1993. Continental comparisons of temperate-zone tree
species diversity. In: Ricklefs RE, Schluter D, editors. Species Diversity in
Ecological Communities: historical and Geographical Perspectives. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press; p. 294–314.
Li Y, Smith T, Popova S, Yang J, Li C-S. 2014. Paleobiogeography of the lotus
plant (Nelumbonaceae: nelumbo) and its bearing on the paleoclimatic
changes. Palaeogeogr, Palaeoclimatol, Palaeoecol. 399:284–293.
Lopatin AV. 2004. Early Miocene small mammals from the North Aral Region
(Kazakhstan) with special reference to their biostratigraphic significance.
Paleont J. 38(Suppl):S217–S323.
Lucas SG, Kordikova EG, Emry RJ. 1998. Oligocene stratigraphy, sequence
stratigraphy, and mammalian biochronology north of the Aral Sea, western
Kazakhstan. In: beard C, Dawson MR, editors. Dawn of the age of mammals
in Asia. Bull Carnegie Mus Nat Hist. 34:313–348.
Mai DH. 1995. Tertiäre Vegetationsgeschichte Europas. Stuttgart: Gustav
Fischer Verlag; p. 691.
Manchester SR. 1999. Biogeographical relationships of North American Tertiary
floras. Ann Missouri Bot Gard. 86:472–522.
26
T. DENK ET AL.
Naryshkina NN, Evstigneeva TA. 2020. Fagaceae in the Eocene palynoflora of
the South of Primorskii Region: new data on taxonomy and morphology.
Paleont J. 54:429–439.
Nikitin VP. 2006. Paleocarpology and stratigraphy of the Paleogene and
Neogene strata in Asian Russia. Novosibirsk: Academic Publishing House
“Geo”; p. 229. [In Russian]
Ohba H, Akiyama S. 2016. Generic segregation of some sections and subsections
of the genus Hydrangea (Hydrangeaceae). J Japan Bot. 91:345–350.
Ohwi J. 1965. Flora of Japan: in English: combined, much revised and extended
translation. Washington: Smithsonian Institution; p. 1067.
Oreshkina TV, Aleksandrova GN, Lyapunov SM, Smirnov PV, Ermolaev BV.
2020. Micropaleontological and lithogeochemical characteristics of the
Turtas Formation (Upper Oligocene), Western Siberia. Stratigr Geol
Correl. 28(3):311–329.
Pavlyutkin BI. 2015. The genus Quercus (Fagaceae) in the Early Oligocene Flora
of Kraskino, Primorskii Region. Paleont J. 49:668–676.
Popov SV, Bugrova EM, Amitrov OV, Andreyeva-Grigorovich AS,
Akhmetiev MA, Zaporozhets MI, Nikolaeva IA, Sychevskaja EK,
Shcherba IG. 2004. Biogeography of the northern Peri-Tethys from the late
Eocene to the early Miocene. Part 3. Late Oligocene-early Miocene marine
basins. Paleont J. 38(SupplSeries 6):S653–S716.
Popov SV, Voronia AA, Gontscharova IA. 1993. Stratigraphy and bivalves of the
Oligocene– lower Miocene of the Eastern Paratethys. Publ Paleont Inst 256.
Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences [in Russian].
Popova S, Utescher T, Averyanova A, Tarasevich V, Tropina P, Yaowu X. 2019b.
Early Miocene flora of central Kazakhstan (Turgai Plateau) and its paleoenvironmental implications. Plant Diversity. 41:183–197.
Popova S, Utescher T, Gromyko D, Mosbrugger V, Francois L. 2019a.
Dynamics and evolution of Turgay-type vegetation in Western Siberia
throughout the early Oligocene to earliest Miocene–a study based on
diversity of plant functional types in the carpological record. J Syst Evol.
57:129–141.
Prader S, Kotthoff U, Greenwood DR, McCarthy FMG, Schmiedl G,
Donders TH. 2020. New Jersey’s paleoflora and eastern North American
climate through Paleogene–Neogene warm phases. Rev Palaeobot Palynol.
279. doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2020.104224.
Rafinesque CS. 1836. Ulmus longifolia. In: Rafinesque CS, editor. New Flora of
North America. Third Part. Philadelphia: Printed for the author and publisher; p. 38.
Rowlatt U, Morshead H. 1992. Architecture of the leaf of the greater reed mace,
Typha latifolia L. Bot J Linn Soc. 110:161–170.
Rowley JR, Erdtman G. 1967. Sporoderm in Populus and Salix. Grana.
7:517–567.
Sadowski E-M, Schmidt AR, Denk T. 2020. Staminate inflorescences with in situ
pollen from Eocene Baltic amber reveal high diversity in Fagaceae (oak
family). Willdenowia. 50:405–517. doi:10.3372/wi.50.50303
Saporta de G. 1891. Recherches sur la végétation du niveau aquitanien de
Manosque (Suite). Mém Soc Géol France. 9(3):35–83.
Schneider W. 1992. Floral successions in the Miocene swamps and bogs of
Central Europe. Z Geol Wiss. 20:555–570.
Shaparenko KK. 1956. History of the Salviniaceae. Proceedings of the Botanical
Institute of the Academy of Sciences USSR, Ser. 8. Paleobotany. 2: 7–44. [In
Russian].
Shatsky SB. 1978. Main problems in the Paleogene stratigraphy and paleogeography of Western Siberia. In: Shatsky SB, editor. Paleogene and Neogene of
Siberia (Paleontology and Stratigraphy). Novosibirsk: Nauka; p. 3–21 [In
Russian].
Smirnov PS, Konstantinov AO, Aleksandrova GN, Kuzmina OB,
Shurygin BN. 2017. New data on the lithology of coastal facies of the
Turtas Formation (upper Oligocene, Southwestern Siberia). Doklady
Earth Sci. 475:868–871.
Sternberg C. 1823. Versuch einer geognostisch-botanischen Darstellung der
Flora der Vorwelt, 1 (3). Leipzig (Prag): F. Fleischer; p. 1–39.
Stitzenberger E. 1851. Uebersicht der Versteinerungen des Grossherzogthums
Baden. Freiburg i. Br.: J. Diernfellner.
Su T, Li SF, Tang H, Huang YJ, Li SH, Deng CL, Zhou ZK. 2018. Hemitrapa Miki
(Lythraceae) from the earliest Oligocene of southeastern Qinghai-Tibetan
Plateau and its phytogeographic implications. Rev Palaeobot Palynol.
257:57–63.
Takhtajan A, editor. 1974. Fossil flowering plants of Russia and adjacent states.
Vol. 1 Magnoliaceae–Eucommiaceae. Leningrad: Komarov Botanical
Institute, Academy of Sciences of the USSR; 188. [In Russian].
Teodoridis V, Kvaček Z. 2005. The extinct genus Chaneya Wang & Manchester
in the Tertiary of Europe – a revision of Porana-like fruit remains from
Oehningen and Bohemia. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 134:85–103.
Teodoridis V, Kvaček Z. 2006. Palaeobotanical research of the Early Miocene
deposits overlying the main coal seam (Libkovice and Lom Members) in the
Most Basin (Czech Republic). Bull Geosci. 81(2):93–113.
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 2016. An update of the Angiosperm
Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering
plants: APG IV. Bot J Linn Soc. 181:1–20.
Unger F. 1847. Chloris protogæa. Beiträge zur Flora der Vorwelt. Leipzig:
Engelmann.
Unger F. 1849. Blätterabdrücke aus dem Schwefelflötze von Swoszowice in
Galicien. Haiding. Naturwiss. Abh3(1):121–128.
Unger F. 1850. Genera et species plantarum fossilium. Vindobona: Wilhelm
Braunmüller; p. 627.
Unified regional stratigraphic schemes of Paleogene and Neogene deposits of the
West Siberian Plain. 2001. Explanatory Note. Novosibirsk: Sib NauchnoIsseld Inst Geol Geofiz, Miner Syr’ya; 84 p. [in Russian].
Vassiljev VN. 1949. Trapa L. In: Shishkin BK, Bobrov EG, editors. Flora URSS,
Vol. 15, [In Russian]. Moscow (Leningrad): Editio Academiae Scientiarum
URSS; p. 638–662.
Velitzelos D, Bouchal JM, Denk T. 2014. Review of the Cenozoic floras and
vegetation of Greece. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 204:56–117.
Volkova VS, Gnibidenko ZN, Kul’kova IA. 2000. The nature of the Late
Oligocene Turtas lake-sea in West Siberia. Russian Geol Geophys. 41:58–66.
Volkova VS, Kuzmina OB, Gnibidenko ZN, Golovina AG. 2016. The Paleogene/
Neogene boundary in continental deposits of the West Siberian Plain.
Russian Geol Geophys. 57:303–315.
Walther H. 1994. Invasion of Arcto-Tertiary elements in the Palaeogene of
Central Europe. In: Boulter MC, Fisher H, editors. Cenozoic Plants and
Climates of the Arctic. NATO ASI Series, Series I Global Environmental
Change (Vol. 27). Berlin (Heidelberg): Springer; p. 239–250.
Walther H, Zastawniak E. 1991. Fagaceae from Sośnica and Malczyce (near
Wrocław, Poland). A revision of original materials by Göppert 1852 and 1855
and a study of new collections. Acta Palaeobot. 31:153–199.
Walther H, Eichler B. 2010. Die neogene Flora von Ottendorf-Okrilla bei
Dresden. Geol Saxonica J Central European Geol. 56:193–234.
Wang Q. 2012. Fruits of Hemitrapa (Trapaceae) from the Miocene of Eastern
China, their correlation with Sporotrapoidites erdtmannii pollen and paleobiogeographic implications. J Paleont. 86:156–166.
Wang YF, Manchester SR. 2000. Chaneya, a new genus of winged fruit from the
Tertiary of North America and eastern Asia. Int J Plant Sci. 161:167–178.
Woodward FI, Lomas MR, Kelly CK. 2004. Global climate and the distribution
of plant biomes. Phil Transact Royal Soc London, Series B. 359:1465–1476.
Worobiec G, Worobiec E, Kvaček Z. 2010. Neogene leaf morphotaxa of
Malvaceae s.l. in Europe. Int J Plant Sci. 171:892–914.
Wu ZY, Raven PH. editors. 2001. Flora of China. Vol. 8 (Brassicaceae through
Saxifragaceae). Beijing: Science Press, and St. Louis: Missouri Botanical
Garden Press.
Yakubovskaya TA. 1957. New findings of Tertiary flora in Tomsk Priobie. Proc
Acad Sci USSR. 116: 2. [In Russian].
Zal’tsman IG. 1968. Stratigraphy of Paleogene and Neogene deposits of Kulunda
Steppe. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarskoe Knizhnoe Izd. [In Russian].
Zhang P, Ao H, Dekkers MJ, An Z, Wang L, Li YLiu S, Qiang X, Chang H, Zhao
H. 2018. Magnetochronology of the Oligocene mammalian faunas in the
Lanzhou Basin, Northwest China. J Asian Earth Sci. 159:24–33.
Zhilin SG. 1974. The Tertiary floras of the Plateau Ustjurt (Transcaspia).
St. Petersburg: Komarov Botanical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of
the USSR. [In Russian].
Zhilin SG. 1989. History of the development of the temperate forest flora in
Kazakhstan, U.S.S.R. from the Oligocene to the early Miocene. Bot Rev.
55:205–330.
Zhilin SG. 2001. Structure of the Turgayan flora in the Oligocene and Miocene
and its palaeoclimatic features. Acta Palaeobot. 41:141–146.
Zykin VS. 2012. Stratigraphy and evolution of environments and climate during late
Cenozoic in the southern West Siberia. Novosibirsk: GEO; p. 488. [In Russian]