Hindawi
Case Reports in Urology
Volume 2018, Article ID 3186060, 5 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3186060
Case Report
Adult Bilateral Ureteroceles Presenting with Lower Urinary
Tract Symptoms and Acute Urinary Retention
Alexis Rompré-Brodeur
and Sero Andonian
Division of Urology, McGill University Health Center, 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montreal, QC, Canada H4A 3J1
Correspondence should be addressed to Sero Andonian; sero.andonian@muhc.mcgill.ca
Received 25 February 2018; Accepted 3 May 2018; Published 26 June 2018
Academic Editor: Giorgio Carmignani
Copyright © 2018 Alexis Rompré-Brodeur and Sero Andonian. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative
Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the
original work is properly cited.
Ureterocele is a well-known pathologic entity in the pediatric urology population but remains a diagnostic and treatment challenge
in the adult population. Adult ureteroceles remain a diagnostic challenge for the adult urologist. Its prevalence is estimated between
1/500 and 1/4000 patients with a wide variety of clinical presentations. We present the case of a 30-year-old female patient who
presented with severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and acute urinary retention secondary to prolapsing bilateral singlesystem orthotopic ureteroceles. She was successfully treated with transurethral unroofing of her bilateral ureteroceles and she is
currently asymptomatic. This case represents the first reported case of bilateral ureteroceles presenting with severe LUTS and
subsequent urinary retention from the prolapse of one of the ureteroceles. We provide a review of the most recent case series
of adult ureteroceles and their outcomes. Transurethral unroofing of the ureterocele is a safe and minimally invasive approach for
this disease.
1. Introduction
Ureterocele is a well-known pathologic entity in the pediatric
urology population but remains a diagnostic and treatment
challenge in adult population. Its prevalence is estimated
between 1/500 and 1/4000 patients with a wide variety of
clinical presentations described [1]. We present a case of
a 30-year-old female patient with bilateral single-system
ureteroceles and secondary urinary retention successfully
treated endoscopically. Her case constitutes the first reported
adult case of bilateral ureteroceles causing bladder outlet
obstruction and urinary retention.
2. Case Presentation
A 30-year-old female was referred to the urology clinic for
severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in addition to
suspicion of a urethral mass. Her symptoms started two years
earlier after the indwelling urethral catheter was removed
following her Caesarian section. She noticed that a vestibular
mass protruded at the level of her urethra and she reported
increasing need to strain to void. In addition, this vestibular
mass was very painful, and it required manual reduction to
allow for her to void. LUTS got progressively worse over
the course of the two years. In addition to the dysuria,
she had intermittent hematuria, frequency of every hour as
well as nocturia 3 to 4 times per night. Her personal past
medical history was only positive for a remote appendectomy
and a caesarean section. The patient had been previously
worked up by her obstetrician since the LUTS appeared
after her caesarean delivery. She had repeated urine analyses
and cultures that were negative. Abdominal ultrasonography
demonstrated the presence of two cystic lesions in the bladder
of 2.5cm and 9mm in diameter. The kidneys did not show any
hydronephrosis nor hydroureter. Her blood work, including
renal function, was unremarkable.
Examination in lithotomy position revealed a very sensitive erythematous mucosa protruding from the urethra.
Patient had to manually reduce the vestibular mass in the
sitting position so that she could undergo cystoscopic examination under local anesthesia. Otherwise, it was too painful
for the patient. Once reduced, cystoscopy was performed
and demonstrated the presence of two large ureteroceles.
The left ureterocele, which was significantly larger than
2
Case Reports in Urology
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
Figure 1: Preoperative (a, b, c) and postoperative (d, e, f) comparison of computed tomography (CT) scans. Preoperative triphasic CT scan
images. (a) Contrast-infused axial images of the pelvis demonstrating two large bilateral intravesical cavities. (b) Axial delayed-phase images
of the pelvis confirming the diagnosis of bilateral ureteroceles. (c) Coronal delayed-phase images of the pelvis provide another view of the
bilateral ureteroceles. Postoperative triphasic CT scan images. (d) Contrast-infused axial images of the pelvis demonstrating the absence of
intravesical cavities. (e) Axial delayed-phase images of the pelvis confirming the absence of any residual ureteroceles. (f) Coronal delayedphase images of the pelvis.
the right side, demonstrated erythematous and edematous
mucosa indicating that the vestibular mass previously noted
by the patient and on examination was likely the wall of the
left ureterocele. To rule out duplex system, a triphasic CTurogram was ordered and it confirmed the patient’s bilateral
single-system ureteroceles (Figures 1(a)–1(c)). No urolithiasis
was identified in both collecting systems. She was offered
transurethral “unroofing” of her ureteroceles with placement
of bilateral indwelling ureteral stents to reduce risk of ureteral
obstruction postoperatively (Figure 2). While the patient
was waiting for her elective surgery, she presented to the
emergency department in acute urinary retention in addition
to significant lower abdominal pain. An indwelling urethral
catheter was placed to reduce the prolapsed ureterocele,
decompress the bladder, and control her severe pain. Subsequently, she underwent the planned endoscopic procedure.
We started with the larger and more symptomatic left ureterocele. As soon as we unroofed the ureterocele, we identified
the normal ureteral orifice and placed ureteral catheter over
a guidewire (Figure 2). Ureteral catheters were used to avoid
injuring the back wall of the ureterocele and avoid injuring
the true ureteral orifice within the ureterocele. The same
procedure was repeated for the smaller right ureterocele.
Once the anterior wall of the ureterocele was resected, we
placed indwelling ureteral stents bilaterally. Final pathology
demonstrated benign urothelium with cystitis cystica and
glandularis in addition to Von Brunn’s nests. Indwelling
ureteral stents were removed shortly after her operation. At
3-month follow-up, the patient was completely asymptomatic
with normal voiding patterns, a normal flow study and
renal function. Repeat CT-urogram demonstrated resolution
of her bilateral ureteroceles without any signs of ureteral
stricture, nor hydronephrosis (Figures 1(d)–1(f)). A voiding
cystourethrogram was not performed given that the patient
remained asymptomatic at 6 months postoperatively without
any signs of vesico-ureteral reflux or urinary tract infections.
3. Discussion
A ureterocele is a well-known entity among pediatric urologic population but it remains a challenge in the adult
population. Most of our knowledge is based on case reports
and case series. Based on autopsy studies, its prevalence
in the adult population ranges between 1/500 and 1/4000
[1]. Whereas pediatric ureteroceles are often associated with
duplicated collecting systems in nonorthotopic positions,
adult ureteroceles are mainly reported in unilateral single
systems in intravesical orthotopic positions [1, 2]. The mean
age of presentation ranges from the third to the fifth decade
(Table 1). Presenting symptoms vary greatly but urinary tract
infections remain the most common [2]. Urinary retention
secondary to prolapsing ureteroceles in adults has been
reported in only seven cases. All of these occurred with
unilateral prolapse of a single-system ureterocele [3–9]. This
case constitutes the first reported adult case of a bilateral
ureteroceles causing bladder outlet obstruction secondary
to prolapse of one of the ureteroceles. Similar to pediatric
populations, adult ureteroceles can contain stones at a rate
of 4–39%. The main composition of theses stones is calciumoxalate and calcium-phosphate [10]. In the present case, CT
scan confirmed the absence of urolithiasis.
Treatment options vary but most reported cases seem
to favor a low transverse incision with Collin’s knife in a
“smiling” fashion, similarly to what is being advocated for
the pediatric population (Table 1) [11]. Recently, Holium and
KTP lasers have been used to make the incision [12, 13]. Other
approaches such as simple puncture or endoscopic unroofing
Mean
age/Range
Number
of cases
Bilateral
Urinary
retention
Urolithiasis
Jimenez et al. [8]
1976
31
1
0/1
1/1
0/1
Sehn et al. [7]
1981
32
1
0/1
1/1
0/1
Sandhu et al. [9]
1992
N/A
1
0/1
1/1
N/A
Sekine et al. [3]
1996
40
1
0/1
1/1
0/1
Chtourou et al. [13]
2002
48.3
20
4/20
N/S
20/20
Spatafora et al. [14]
2006
18-62
15
4/15
0/15
N/S
Shah et al. [9]
2008
35
16
2/16
N/S
16/16
Seibold et al. [16]
2010
48
8
1/8
0/8
5/8
Vijay et al. [11]
2011
25
26
2/26
0/26
3/26
Isen et al. [15]
Westesson et al. [4]
2012
2013
47
41
5
1
/05
0/1
0/5
1/1
2/5
0/1
Sinha et al. [5]
2014
35
1
0/1
1/1
1/1
Liu et al. [10]
2015
31
30
2/30
0/30
2/30
Villagomez-Camargo
et al. [6]
2015
24
1
0/1
1/1
0/1
-
-
127
18/127
7/91
52/111
Authors
Total
Method of resection
Transcutaneous
puncture
Transvesical excision
and reimplantation
N/A
Transverse incision
Collin’s knife
Transverse incision
Collin’s knife
Transurethral
transverse incision and
percutaneous
combined approach
F/U imaging
Complication
N/A
N/A
N/A
0/1
N/A
N/A
IVU, VCUG
0/1
VCUG
1/20 with resolution at 6
months’ follow-up
VCUG
2/15 low grade VUR
Transverse incision
Holium laser
U/S, IVU,
VCUG
Bugbee wire elec-trode
Transverse incision
Collin’s knife
Nephroscopic scissors
Transverse incision
Transurethral
unroofing resection
Transverse incision
KTP Laser
U/S, VCUG
U/S, IVU and
VCUG
VCUG
Nil
3/16 low-grade VUR at
3months, with resolution
at 6 months
0/8
2/26 Low grade VUR
asymptomatic
0/5
0/1
N/A
0/1
U/S, IVU,
VCUG
1/30 grade I VUR with
resolution at 6 months
Cohen’s reimplantation
Nil
0/1
-
-
9/127 low grade VUR. 5/9
had documented
spontaneous resolution of
VUR at 6 months.
Case Reports in Urology
Table 1: Review of literature of adult ureteroceles.
Publication
year
3
4
Case Reports in Urology
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 2: Endoscopic images during transurethral resection of bilateral ureteroceles. (a) View from the bladder neck of the left ureterocele
with bullous edematous mucosa that was prolapsing. (b) After unroofing of the left ureterocele, the internal left ureteral orifice was cannulated
with a hybrid nitinol-PTFE guidewire. (c) A ureteral catheter was placed over the guidewire. (d) Image of the left bladder trigone after complete
resection of the left ureterocele. BN: bladder neck. UO: ureteric orifice. Ur: ureterocele wall.
with the resectoscope have also been described (Table 1).
Case series have reported rate of developing postoperative
vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) to range from 0% to 33% in
patients with low transverse “smiling” incision; most cases
resolved spontaneously at 6 months of follow-up (Table 1)
[14]. Our review of the current literature showed a low
(7.1%) risk of postoperative VUR after endoscopic treatment
with documented spontaneous resolution in half of the cases
with none requiring further treatment, hence reinforcing
the widespread clinical practice to investigate adult VUR
only in symptomatic patients (Table 1). In our patient’s
case, we opted for a transurethral unroofing technique as
the ureterocele had been prolapsing and causing urinary
retention. A “smiling” incision was not performed since
excess remnant tissue associated with the low transverse
“smiling” incision has been reported to prolapse, requiring
a second procedure [15]. Therefore, in our case, the patient
was cured with a single transurethral unroofing of both
ureteroceles. She did not complain of any VUR symptoms.
To our knowledge, this case represents the first reported case
of bilateral ureteroceles presenting with severe LUTS and
subsequent urinary retention from the prolapse of one of the
ureteroceles. At any age of presentation, ureteroceles can be
part of a complex malformation of the upper urinary tract
and careful investigation is mandatory for an appropriate
treatment plan. Transurethral unroofing of the ureterocele
is a safe and minimally invasive approach for this disease in
adults.
Abbreviations
BN:
LUTS:
UO:
Ur:
VUR:
Bladder neck
Lower urinary tract symptoms
Ureteric orifice
Ureterocele wall
Vesicoureteral reflux.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Case Reports in Urology
References
[1] C. Peter and C. Mendelsohn, “Ectopic ureter, ureterocele, and
ureteral anomalies,” in Campbell-Walsh Urology, A. J. Wein, L.
R. Kavoussi, A. W. Partin, and C. Peters, Eds., pp. 3075–3101,
Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 11th edition, 2016.
[2] S. Halachmi and G. Pillar, “Congenital urological anomalies
diagnosed in adulthood - Management considerations,” Journal
of Pediatric Urology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 2–7, 2008.
[3] H. Sekine, S.-I. Kojima, M. Mine, and M. Yokokawa, “Intravesical ureterocele presenting bladder outlet obstruction in an adult
male,” International Journal of Urology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 74–76,
1996.
[4] K. E. Westesson and H. B. Goldman, “Prolapse of a singlesystem ureterocele causing urinary retention in an adult
woman,” International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor
Dysfunction, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1761–1763, 2013.
[5] R. K. Sinha, S. Singh, and P. Kumar, “Prolapsed ureterocele, with
calculi within, causing urinary retention in adult female,” BMJ
Case Reports, 2014.
[6] R. Villagómez-Camargo, M. Chopin-Gazga, J. Saucedo-Bravo,
E. Garcı́a-Cano, and Á. Montiel-Jarquı́n, “Retención aguda de
orina secundaria a prolapso de ureterocele gigante en una mujer
adulta joven. Informe de un caso,” Cirugı́a y Cirujanos, vol. 84,
no. 4, pp. 336–339, 2016.
[7] J. T. Sehn and M. Schiff Jr., “Urinary retention secondary to
simple ureterocele in an adult,” British Journal of Urology, vol.
53, no. 4, p. 391, 1981.
[8] J. F. Jimenez, F. G. Lopez, and F. Sole-Balcells, “Acute retention
of urine due to prolapsed ectopic ureterocele in an adult male.,”
European Urology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 153–155, 1976.
[9] D. P. Sandhu, S. J. Stinchombe, and K. W. Munson, “Acute urinary
retention in a male due to prolapsed ureterocele.,” British
Journal of Hospital Medicine, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 218-219, 1992.
[10] F. Grases, O. Söhnel, A. Costa-Bauzá, E. Pieras, and D. Muñoz,
“Structural features of three ureterocele calculi,” International
Urology and Nephrology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 765–769, 2007.
[11] M. A. Rich, M. A. Keating, H. M. Snyder III, and J. W. Duckett,
“Low transurethral incision of single system intravesical ureteroceles in children,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 144, no. 1, pp.
120-121, 1990.
[12] H. N. Shah, H. Sodha, A. A. Khandkar, S. Kharodawala, S.
S. Hegde, and M. Bansal, “Endoscopic management of adult
orthotopic ureterocele and associated calculi with holmium
laser: Experience with 16 patients over 4 years and review of literature,” Journal of Endourology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 489–495, 2008.
[13] C. Liu, W. Chen, C. Xie et al., “Efficacy and safety of
transurethral photoselective greenlight() laser vaporization
for the treatment of orthotopic ureteroceles in adults,” Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 326–329, 2015.
[14] M. K. Vijay, P. Vijay, A. Dutta, A. Gupta, P. Tiwari, S. Kumar et
al., “The safety and efficacy of endoscopic incision of orthotopic
ureterocele in adult,” Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and
Transplantation, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1169–1174, 2011.
[15] D. E. Coplen and J. S. Barthold, “Controversies in the management of ectopic ureteroceles,” Urology, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 665–
668, 2000.
[16] J. Seibold, S. H. Alloussi, D. Schilling, D. Colleselli, A. Stenzl,
and C. Schwentner, “Minimally-invasive treatment of complicated ureteroceles in adults avoiding vesico-ureteric reflux,”
Central European Journal of Urology, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 74–76,
2010.
5
MEDIATORS
of
INFLAMMATION
The Scientific
World Journal
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
www.hindawi.com
2013
Volume 2018
Gastroenterology
Research and Practice
Hindawi
www.hindawi.com
Journal of
Diabetes Research
Hindawi
www.hindawi.com
Volume 2018
Volume 2018
Hindawi
www.hindawi.com
Volume 2018
Hindawi
www.hindawi.com
Volume 2018
International Journal of
Journal of
Endocrinology
Immunology Research
Hindawi
www.hindawi.com
Disease Markers
Hindawi
www.hindawi.com
Volume 2018
Volume 2018
Submit your manuscripts at
www.hindawi.com
BioMed
Research International
PPAR Research
Hindawi
www.hindawi.com
Hindawi
www.hindawi.com
Volume 2018
Volume 2018
Journal of
Obesity
Journal of
Ophthalmology
Hindawi
www.hindawi.com
Volume 2018
Evidence-Based
Complementary and
Alternative Medicine
Stem Cells
International
Hindawi
www.hindawi.com
Volume 2018
Hindawi
www.hindawi.com
Volume 2018
Journal of
Oncology
Hindawi
www.hindawi.com
Volume 2018
Hindawi
www.hindawi.com
Volume 2013
Parkinson’s
Disease
Computational and
Mathematical Methods
in Medicine
Hindawi
www.hindawi.com
Volume 2018
AIDS
Behavioural
Neurology
Hindawi
www.hindawi.com
Research and Treatment
Volume 2018
Hindawi
www.hindawi.com
Volume 2018
Hindawi
www.hindawi.com
Volume 2018
Oxidative Medicine and
Cellular Longevity
Hindawi
www.hindawi.com
Volume 2018