REVIEW
published: 28 October 2020
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.570862
Molecular Approaches for Low-Cost
Point-of-Care Pathogen Detection in
Agriculture and Forestry
Paolo Baldi 1* and Nicola La Porta 1,2
1
IASMA Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Trento, Italy, 2 The EFI Project Centre on Mountain
Forests (MOUNTFOR), San Michele a/Adige, Trento, Italy
Edited by:
Sébastien Duplessis,
INRA Centre Nancy-Lorraine, France
Reviewed by:
Nicolas Feau,
University of British Columbia,
Canada
Jaime Aguayo,
Agence Nationale de Sécurité
Sanitaire de l’Alimentation,
de l’Environnement et du Travail
(ANSES), France
*Correspondence:
Paolo Baldi
paolo.baldi@fmach.it
Specialty section:
This article was submitted to
Plant Pathogen Interactions,
a section of the journal
Frontiers in Plant Science
Received: 09 June 2020
Accepted: 29 September 2020
Published: 28 October 2020
Citation:
Baldi P and La Porta N (2020)
Molecular Approaches for Low-Cost
Point-of-Care Pathogen Detection
in Agriculture and Forestry.
Front. Plant Sci. 11:570862.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.570862
Early detection of plant diseases is a crucial factor to prevent or limit the spread of
a rising infection that could cause significant economic loss. Detection test on plant
diseases in the laboratory can be laborious, time consuming, expensive, and normally
requires specific technical expertise. Moreover, in the developing countries, it is often
difficult to find laboratories equipped for this kind of analysis. Therefore, in the past
years, a high effort has been made for the development of fast, specific, sensitive,
and cost-effective tests that can be successfully used in plant pathology directly in
the field by low-specialized personnel using minimal equipment. Nucleic acid-based
methods have proven to be a good choice for the development of detection tools
in several fields, such as human/animal health, food safety, and water analysis, and
their application in plant pathogen detection is becoming more and more common.
In the present review, the more recent nucleic acid-based protocols for point-of-care
(POC) plant pathogen detection and identification are described and analyzed. All these
methods have a high potential for early detection of destructive diseases in agriculture
and forestry, they should help make molecular detection for plant pathogens accessible
to anyone, anywhere, and at any time. We do not suggest that on-site methods should
replace lab testing completely, which remains crucial for more complex researches,
such as identification and classification of new pathogens or the study of plant defense
mechanisms. Instead, POC analysis can provide a useful, fast, and efficient preliminary
on-site screening that is crucial in the struggle against plant pathogens.
Keywords: biosensor portable devices, in field detection, qPCR, LAMP, RPA, RCA, SDA, MinION nanopore
sequencing
INTRODUCTION
Plant pathogens represent one of the major threats for agriculture worldwide (Narayanasamy,
2011; Aslam et al., 2017; Pallas et al., 2018). In the last centuries, in parallel with the continuing
growth of the human population, the percentage of the land surface covered by crops has increased
constantly, with ca. 50% of the current habitable world land dedicated to agriculture1 . In 2016, it
was estimated that approximately 540 million hectares were planted worldwide to only three major
1
https://ourworldindata.org/land-use
Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
1
October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 570862
Baldi and La Porta
Plant Pathogens Molecular Identification Approaches
have been reported (Gorris et al., 1994; Martinelli et al., 2015).
Since the nineties, more laboratories started to adopt DNAbased methods for pathogen detection and identification, using
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and its variants, such as
quantitative PCR (qPCR), nested PCR, multiplex PCR, and
digital PCR (ddPCR) (Martinelli et al., 2015). Such methods are
usually very specific, relatively fast, and cheap but still present
some disadvantages, as in most cases, specific equipment is
required as well as trained personnel. Since the first few years of
this century, new technologies are emerging based on isothermal
amplification of DNA, such as the loop-mediated isothermal
amplification (LAMP), recombinase polymerase amplification
(RPA), helicase-dependent amplification (HDA), and others
(Lau and Botella, 2017), capable of overcoming some of the
drawbacks of PCR-based methods (Zhong and Zhao, 2018). All
these approaches, even if based on different principles, share
the main characteristic of amplifying target DNA at constant
temperature, therefore eliminating the need of a thermal cycler.
Due to the rapid evolution of methods for pathogen detection,
in many fields such as human health and food safety, it is
dawning the possibility to develop new tools that can be
taken directly to the desired analysis site, also called pointof-care (POC) (Chen et al., 2019; Vidic et al., 2019). Ideally,
such tools should consist of robust, portable, user-friendly,
and inexpensive equipment capable of performing all the steps
required for a complete analysis in a short time and with a
minimal number of steps, in order to be used also by lowtrained personnel. All these requirements have been summarized
for the first time by the World Health Organization (WHO)
in the ASSURED (Affordable, Sensitive, Specific, User-friendly,
Robust and rapid, Equipment-free, Deliverable) guidelines for
POC testing (Peeling et al., 2006). The potential advantages of
POC analysis are numerous (Table 1), going from the speed
of the analysis to the lower risk of sample contamination and
pathogen dispersion. As a matter of fact, the possibility to detect a
pathogen (Radhakrishnan et al., 2019) directly in the field would
be of great interest in agriculture and forestry. It would allow
extensive and fast screening of plants in order to prevent disease
spreading. Moreover, imported plants and products could be
analyzed directly on-site before they can even enter a country.
Two important applications of POC analysis are the study of
emergent non-native introduced pathogens (Tomlinson et al.,
2010; Buhlmann et al., 2013; Blaser et al., 2018; Aglietti et al.,
2019; Rani et al., 2019) and chronic disease monitoring (De Boer
and Lopez, 2012; Zheng et al., 2013).
The DNA-based analysis methods are proving to be
good candidates for the development of POC analysis
protocols, especially since the advent of the new isothermal
technologies. Nevertheless, providing a portable tool capable
of performing a complete test in the field is not an easy
task as there are at least three main steps that should be
performed: (a) sample preparation/DNA extraction; (b)
DNA amplification; (c) signal detection (Figure 1). In the
following sections, we analyze the progress made in the
recent years in order to exploit DNA-based technologies
for the development of portable tools suitable for plant
pathogen detection, considering all the main steps of the
crop species: maize, rice, and wheat (McDonald and Stukenbrock,
2016). Plant pathogens can cause substantial reduction of crop
productivity. Considering five of the major crops (maize, rice,
wheat, potatoes, and soybean), it was shown that the losses,
associated with pathogens and pests at a global level, ranged
between 17 and 30% annually (Ramakrishnan et al., 2019; Savary
et al., 2019). In agriculture and forestry, most of the damage
is due to the accidental introduction of invasive alien pathogen
species into new areas, as a consequence of global trade and
transport (Ghelardini et al., 2017). Moreover, the extension of
the distribution range of the pathogens due to human-mediated
activities facilitates hybridization and horizontal gene transfer,
leading to the emergence of new pathogens (Gluck-Thaler and
Slot, 2015). Also, the introduction of arthropod vectors into
new areas can bring the establishment of novel association with
introduced or native pathogen species (Wingfield et al., 2016).
Well known examples of introduction of invasive pathogens
exist both in agriculture and forestry. The wheat blast pathogen
Pyricularia graminis-tritici appeared recently in Asia for the first
time, maybe coming from South America, and devastated more
than 15,000 ha of crops in Bangladesh (Callaway, 2016). In Italy,
since 2013, Xylella fastidiosa is causing a severe loss of olive
trees in the southern part of the country. Genetic analysis of
the Italian strains showed similarity to isolates from Central
America (Marcelletti and Scortichini, 2016; Giampetruzzi et al.,
2017). Cronartium ribicola, the causal agent of white pine blister
rust migrated from Europe to North America along with plant
material, while the subspecies americana of the Dutch elm disease
fungus Ophiostoma novo-ulmi arrived in Europe from North
America with rock elm logs (Ghelardini et al., 2017).
Another factor that influences plant–pathogen interaction is
climate change. Increased temperature, climate extremes, as well
as differences in quantity and pattern of annual precipitation, can
support the spread of plant diseases in agriculture (Schmidhuber
and Tubiello, 2007) and forests (La Porta et al., 2008). Finally, the
great majority of the cultivated soil is planted to monocultures
or even to only one genotype (fruit trees, grape, and potato),
thus creating a homogeneous genetic environment that can easily
select host-specialized crop pathogens.
In order to control, and when possible to prevent, plant
diseases and the spread of plant pathogens into new areas, it is
mandatory to develop fast, efficient, and inexpensive methods
for early detection of pathogens. Traditional methods for fungi
and bacteria identification rely on symptom observation and
culture-based methods (Alahi and Mukhopadhyay, 2017). This
implies the necessity of growing the pathogen on specific media
in controlled conditions, a process that usually takes days or
even weeks. Moreover, the morphological identification of the
pathogen by microscopy requires specifically trained personnel.
Other widely used phyto-diagnostic methods are based
on immunological techniques such as enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Cho and Irudayaraj, 2013),
immunofluorescent staining (Khater et al., 2017), immunoblot
(Novakova et al., 2006), and lateral flow immunoassays
(LFIA) (Burnham-Marusich et al., 2018; Cassedy et al., 2020).
Nonetheless, the production of monoclonal antibodies may
be expensive, and in some cases, problems of low specificity
Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
2
October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 570862
Baldi and La Porta
Plant Pathogens Molecular Identification Approaches
TABLE 1 | Main advantages of point-of-care (POC) analysis when compared to
standard laboratory testing.
strawberry. Successful detection of the pathogen was achieved,
after testing several concentrations of the grinding buffer, in order
to optimize amplification also in plants showing early or no
symptoms. Several works showed comparison in amplification
efficiency between purified templates and crude extracts. For
the detection of Xanthomonas fragariae, the causal agent of
angular leaf spot of strawberry, a test was carried out using two
types of templates: pure bacterial DNA and crude extract (Getaz
et al., 2017). LAMP DNA amplification was successful with crude
tissue extract as well as with the pure bacterial DNA control,
after optimization of the protocol. The optimized protocol with
phenol inhibitors was also successfully tested in naturally infected
strawberry leaves, even those with weak symptoms, therefore
suggesting that this method could be a suitable POC analysis.
In another work, different plant sample preparation methods
were compared, using sap obtained after grinding apricot (Prunus
armeniaca) plant tissues as a starting material for the detection
of Candidatus phytoplasma prunorum (Minguzzi et al., 2016).
Similarly, several grinding buffers were compared for Fragaria
ananassa crude sample preparation for the rapid detection of
Phytophthora spp. (Miles et al., 2015). All the above reported
results seem to indicate that the use of plant crude extract for
the direct detection of pathogens with nucleic acid amplification
technologies can be effective and therefore used for in-field
application. The advantage of crude extracts is essentially due
to the very simple and fast extraction protocols, while the
main drawback is the possible lack of sensitivity. Therefore, a
preliminary testing of the method is always necessary, together
with an appropriate optimization according to the plant species,
tissue used as starting material, and specific primers designed for
the amplification step.
Sensitivity and specificity of pathogen detection protocols
can be improved by purifying target DNA. There are a lot of
commercial kits available for this purpose, but most of them
require to be used in a laboratory with dedicated equipment.
Nonetheless, several commercial kits have been tested, and some
of them showed characteristics that could be suitable for POC
analysis, especially those based on the use of magnetic beads for
nucleic acid purification (DeShields et al., 2018). Several works
can be found in literature exploiting this extraction principle
on various plant species and pathogens, such as detection of
the fungus Leptosphaeria maculans, causing Phoma stem canker
(black leg) of Brassica napus (Lei et al., 2019). Other examples
include detection of soil-borne pathogens of potatoes (DeShields
et al., 2018); Alternaria panax Whetz infecting ginseng (Wei
et al., 2018); Puccinia striiformis f.sp. tritici (wheat yellow
rust) infecting wheat (Radhakrishnan et al., 2019); Phytophthora
kernoviae infecting Rhododendron ponticum (Schwenkbier et al.,
2015b) and several other species of Phytophthora (Julich et al.,
2011; Schwenkbier et al., 2014). It must be noted that in
some of the above reported cases, nucleic acid extraction was
performed from cultivated pathogens and not directly from
infected plants, therefore suggesting that optimization of the
protocol could be necessary before its routine application in
the field. A magnetic bead-based RNA extraction method was
used to develop a microfluidic chip for the detection of viruses
infecting Phalaenopsis orchid (Chang et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2015).
Low price
Faster diagnosis and crop decision-making
Low number of steps for the analysis
No storage needed
Low chance of sample deterioration or contamination
Implementable for Citizen Science
No laboratory facilities needed
Low chance of spreading diseases outside contained areas
No samples lost in transit
Very efficient for the analysis of imported plant material
Allows early detection and surveillance activity in epidemiological studies
Low-trained personnel needed
Easy remodeling of the sampling design by results in real time
Allows easy planning of pesticide treatments in the field
analysis and with a particular focus on their application in
agriculture and forestry.
NUCLEIC ACID EXTRACTION
Despite the significant progress made to adapt the DNA
amplification technologies to the needs of POC analysis of plant
pathogens (Lau and Botella, 2017; Donoso and Valenzuela, 2018;
Dairawan and Shetty, 2020), one of the main obstacles is plant
sample preparation and nucleic acid extraction. As a matter
of fact, a high-quality DNA or RNA is always necessary in
order to obtain reliable and reproducible results, irrespective of
the method used for nucleic acid amplification. Even if several
methods have been developed for the fast extraction of nucleic
acids from bacteria, animal cells, and food (Cheng and Jiang,
2006; Kim et al., 2009; Cawthorn et al., 2011; Abdalhai, 2016),
such technologies are often difficult to apply to plant tissues.
If we consider a leaf, the most common plant tissue used for
nucleic acid extraction, cells are surrounded by several protective
structures, such as cell wall and waxy cuticle layers. All these
structures must be degraded in order to extract the genetic
material inside, therefore adding a level of complexity to the
protocol. Moreover, depending on the different plant species
and tissues, a lot of plant contaminant products can be present,
such as proteins, polysaccharides, polyphenolics, and a great
number of secondary metabolites (Varma et al., 2007). All these
contaminants should be removed from the genetic material in
order to obtain a high-quality template suitable for amplification.
Several strategies can be applied, such as the removal of cellular
proteins by organic solvents (typically phenol and chloroform),
but all these steps are quite difficult to include in a completely
portable device.
Many different solutions have been proposed (Table 2), the
simpler of which is the use of plant crude extract (ground plant
material with an extraction buffer) directly for amplification.
Munawar et al. (2019) used strawberry crude crown tissue
macerated with a standard ELISA grinding buffer coupled
with RPA for the detection of Phytophthora cactorum infecting
Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
3
October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 570862
Baldi and La Porta
Plant Pathogens Molecular Identification Approaches
FIGURE 1 | Schematic representation of the main steps needed for the development of a reliable protocol suitable for point-of-care (POC) analysis.
Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
4
October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 570862
Baldi and La Porta
Plant Pathogens Molecular Identification Approaches
TABLE 2 | List of nucleic acid extraction methods suitable for POC analysis.
Extraction
method
Advantages
Disadvantages
Applied for plant
pathogens
Crude extract
Fast, inexpensive, no need of
trained personnel
Presence of contaminants, lack of
sensitivity and reproducibility
Yes
Magnetic beads
Reliable, high-quality genetic
material, no need of centrifugation
Expensive, not completely user
friendly
Yes
Piercing methods
Fast, inexpensive, no need of
trained personnel
Lack of sensitivity, necessity of
optimization
Yes
Fukuta et al. (2005); Suzuki et al.
(2016); Paul et al. (2019, 2020);
Wilisiani et al. (2019)
Cellulose filter
paper
Fast, inexpensive, no need of
trained personnel
Possible absorption of inhibitors,
necessity of optimization
Yes
Lu et al. (2016); Zou et al. (2017)
Miles et al. (2015); Minguzzi et al.
(2016); Getaz et al. (2017); Munawar
et al. (2019)
Chang et al. (2013); Schwenkbier et al.
(2015b); Lin et al. (2015); DeShields
et al. (2018); Wei et al. (2018); Lei et al.
(2019)
In the last few years, the development of new nucleic acid
extraction methods for POC analysis has increased, exploring
different approaches. Zou et al. (2017) tested a variety of
materials for their ability to capture nucleic acids and found
that Whatman No. 1 cellulose-based filter paper can efficiently
entrap and retain DNA without the need of any chemical
treatment. Filter paper-based extraction methods were positively
tested on different plant species, such as wheat, rice, tomato,
soybean, tobacco, mandarin, and lemon, showing good sensitivity
and reproducibility. Similarly, Flinders Technology Associates
(FTA Card, WhatmanTM , catalog number: WB120205, Merck
KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) cards were used for extraction
of DNA or RNA from different starting materials, including
plants, to provide a versatile POC pathogen analysis method (Lu
et al., 2016). Paper-based microfluidics device has emerged as a
multiplexable POC platform, which might be useful in resourcelimited settings (Yetisen et al., 2013). This device was applied in
health care, veterinary medicine, food safety, and environmental
and crop monitoring.
A rapid technique for the extraction of viral RNA from rose
plants was also proposed, based on the direct virus absorption
onto PCR tubes at 4◦ C (Babu et al., 2017). This extraction method
provided viral RNA suitable for molecular analysis in as few as
5 min. This method is very fast and simple, but more studies are
still necessary to understand if it could be applicable routinely to
different pathogens and plant species.
Another option for the rapid extraction of nucleic acids
from plant tissue is the use of lateral-flow devices (LFDs).
A method was developed allowing the extraction of amplifiable
DNA from plant tissue using LFD in as few as 5 min without
the use of any equipment (Danks and Barker, 2000). A simplified
version of this method was described and applied to the
detection of Phytophthora ramorum and Phytophthora kernoviae
(Tomlinson et al., 2010).
The main advantage of the magnetic bead-based extraction
method is reliability, as most of the more commonly used
protocols exploit robust commercial kits already available on
the market. Moreover, it is possible to extract genetic material
without the need of centrifugation steps, but simply using a
magnet that can be easily transported and used on site even
when electricity supply is not available. One possible drawback
is that most of the commercial kits are not 100% user friendly,
and some training is still necessary to use them properly
and avoid contamination. In order to overcome this problem,
some authors tried to simplify the extraction protocol, still
using commercial kits but introducing some modifications. The
first report describing a complete protocol for plant pathogen
detection that could be performed directly in the field dates back
to 2005, and the DNA was extracted modifying a commercial
kit in order to avoid the use of liquid nitrogen and laboratory
equipment, such as centrifuge and vortex (Tomlinson et al.,
2005). Similarly, other authors proposed a modification to
standard protocols to simplify the extraction of genetic material
suitable for amplification with various techniques (Li et al., 2011;
Koo et al., 2013).
A very simple method proposed for DNA or RNA extraction
is the so-called “toothpick method,” in which a sterile toothpick
is used to pierce the sample tissue several times. The tip of the
toothpick is then dipped directly in the amplification reaction
mix, releasing target genetic material (Fukuta et al., 2005; Suzuki
et al., 2016; Wilisiani et al., 2019). Despite the extreme simplicity,
this method needs to be tested and optimized for each specific
need; an example is provided in the next lines. A modern
version of the “toothpick method” was recently proposed using
disposable polymeric microneedle patches (MP) to pierce plant
leaves. These patches are made of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), a
water-absorbing polymer that showed a good combination of
mechanical strength, chemical resistance, and biocompatibility
(Paul et al., 2019, 2020). The use of MP to detect Phytophthora
infestans from tomato leaves showed a slightly lower sensitivity in
comparison to the standard CTAB extraction method, especially
during the very early stages of infection. On the other hand,
the extraction time was reduced to 1 min, instead of 3–4 h of
the CTAB method, suggesting that MP could be easily used for
in-field applications.
Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
References
R
PCR-BASED NUCLEIC ACID
AMPLIFICATION
Once that the DNA or RNA is extracted, the next step is
the amplification of the genetic material using specific primers
5
October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 570862
Baldi and La Porta
Plant Pathogens Molecular Identification Approaches
nested-PCR approach that potentially eliminates the drawbacks
of this technique, such as contamination of the sample (Costa
et al., 2012; Wei et al., 2018).
Finally, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a new technology
allowing absolute quantification of target DNA, which
is partitioned into approximately 20,000 droplets. The
amplification reaction is carried out independently within
each droplet, and a reader can estimate the amount of amplified
DNA in each droplet by fluorescence measurement (Hindson
et al., 2011). ddPCR offers many advantages when compared to
conventional PCR and even qPCR, as multiple target genes can be
detected in a single reaction using different fluorescence signals.
Moreover, no standard curve is required for quantification,
and the sensitivity of ddPCR was shown to be higher than
quantitative PCR when measuring low copy-number genes
(Hayden et al., 2013). Another advantage is the high resilience
of ddPCR to contaminants, that can present a major problem
when plant samples are analyzed (Racki et al., 2014; Blaya et al.,
2016). Although ddPCR has not been used for POC analysis in
agriculture yet, some approaches using this method have been
described (Selvaraj et al., 2018; Zhong et al., 2018; Liu et al.,
2019), and in one case, the ddPCR protocol was proposed to be
applied for use in national clean plant programs to prevent the
import of infected nursery stock (Voegel and Nelson, 2018).
designed to recognize target sequences of the pathogen. Several
approaches can be used and are listed in Table 3. The most
popular methods for laboratory nucleic acid amplification
are still PCR-based ones, including many variants such as
quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), nested PCR, and digital
PCR. Nevertheless, when rapid and simple POC amplification is
required, PCR may present some drawbacks, as it usually requires
a thermal cycler, a device that is not easy to miniaturize and
integrate in a portable tool. Still, some attempts in this direction
have been made for POC application in agriculture. Julich
et al. (2011) developed a lab-on-a-chip device for rapid nucleic
acid-based detection of Phytophthora species. Temperature
management in the PCR and hybridization zones relies on
two independent Peltier elements. The system is completed
by a compact portable pump and power supply for use on
site. A similar approach was proposed by Schwenkbier et al.
(2014) who described a lab-on-a-chip device for on-site detection
of Phytophthora species, exploiting linear-after-the-exponential
PCR (LATE-PCR) as amplification method.
Also, qPCR was often proposed as suitable for POC analysis.
One of the first reports dates back to 2002 (Schaad et al.,
2002) when a protocol for 1-h on-site diagnosis of Xylella
fastidiosa was described using a portable Smart Cycler. Other
examples of qPCR-based methods for POC pathogen detection
include a system for the detection of Phymatotrichopsis omnivora,
in alfalfa and other dicot plants (Arif et al., 2013) and a
protocol for the detection of Phytophthora ramorum, an invasive
plant pathogen listed under quarantine in many countries and
capable of infecting over 180 forest trees species (Tomlinson
et al., 2005). Papers describing fast protocols for plant pathogen
detection via qPCR that could be potentially used for in-field
applications have been published for several species such as
Plum pox virus (Fotiou et al., 2019), Spongospora subterranea
(DeShields et al., 2018), Austropuccinia psidii (Bini et al., 2018),
and Pratylenchus penetrans (Baidoo et al., 2017). In some cases,
real-time-based protocols were proposed for multiplex detection
of plant pathogens (Papayiannis, 2014; Khan et al., 2015; Yang
et al., 2015; Osman et al., 2017; Nikitin et al., 2018). A recent study
proposed an In Situ Processing and Efficient Environmental
Detection (iSPEED) kit to detect pests and pathogens of forest
trees using POC qPCR (Capron et al., 2020). Targeted diseases
included the poplar canker pathogen Sphaerulina musiva, the
white pine blister rust Cronartium ribicola, the comandra blister
rust of pines C. comandrae, the Port Orford cedar pathogen
Phytophthora lateralis, and the agent responsible for sudden oak
and sudden larch death P. ramorum. The iSPEED kit could
be carried in a small backpack and showed results comparable
to those obtained with standard laboratory equipment. The
advantages of the iSPEED kit are the existence of a great amount
of published and validated real-time PCR assays, multiple
enzymes and chemistry for qPCR, as well as a growing range
of portable instruments, cost effectiveness, and flexibility of
design. Another variant of conventional PCR that can be used
to increase specificity and sensitivity is nested-PCR. The use
of two pairs of specific primers usually make this approach
more time consuming and expensive than conventional PCR.
Nevertheless, some researchers have developed a single-tube
Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
ISOTHERMAL NUCLEIC ACID
AMPLIFICATION
In recent years, new technologies for isothermal amplification
of nucleic acids have been developed, and their use is rapidly
spreading (Table 4). The first and most commonly used is
loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) (Notomi et al.,
2000). The main advantages of LAMP when compared to PCRbased approaches are the possibility to perform the amplification
reaction at constant temperature, the short reaction time, high
amplification efficiency, and sensitivity, combined to a relatively
low cost, as LAMP requires very simple equipment to be
performed (Zhao et al., 2015; Lai et al., 2018). Several portable
devices for POC detection of plant pathogen have been described
exploiting LAMP technology. A rapid and simple method
to identify three different species of begomovirus infecting
Cucurbitaceae and Solanaceae plants was recently published,
using a commercial portable device that is battery powered,
user friendly, handheld, and waterproof (Wilisiani et al., 2019).
Another example of portable device suitable for agriculture and
forestry application is a micropipette tip-based nucleic acid test
(MTNT) capable of detecting both DNA and RNA from different
plant crude extracts (Lu et al., 2016). An increasing number
of fast LAMP protocols for POC detection of plant pathogens
are being developed for several species including forest trees
(Tomlinson et al., 2010; Yaseen et al., 2015; Aglietti et al.,
2019) as well as herbaceous plants (Chang et al., 2013; Lin
et al., 2015; Ammour et al., 2017). All these protocols combined
fast nucleic acid extraction methods and signal detection to
LAMP in order to perform all the required steps directly in the
field. It must be noted that, although LAMP is actually a very
6
October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 570862
Baldi and La Porta
Plant Pathogens Molecular Identification Approaches
TABLE 3 | List of the main polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based amplification methods applied for POC plant pathogen detection.
Method
Target
Advantages
Disadvantages
References
Conventional PCR
DNA/RNA
Reliable, relatively cheap
Time consuming, requires a thermocycler
Julich et al. (2011); Schwenkbier et al.
(2014)
Nested-PCR
DNA/RNA
Very specific
Expensive, time consuming, requires a
thermocycler
Costa et al. (2012); Wei et al. (2018)
Real-time PCR
DNA/RNA
Allows absolute quantification of DNA;
no need of post-amplification detection
Time consuming, requires highly purified
genetic material, requires a thermocycler
Tomlinson et al. (2005); Arif et al. (2013);
Koo et al. (2013); Baidoo et al. (2017);
Bini et al. (2018); DeShields et al. (2018);
Fotiou et al. (2019)
Digital PCR
(ddPCR)
DNA/RNA
High sensitivity, resilient to
contaminants, allows absolute
quantification of DNA
Expensive, requires specific equipment
Selvaraj et al. (2018); Voegel and Nelson
(2018); Zhong et al. (2018); Liu et al.
(2019)
in low resource environments is needed (Wambua et al., 2017;
Ghosh et al., 2018; Silva et al., 2018). The possibility to multiplex
the reaction can further increase the speed and reduce the costs
of RPA (Lau et al., 2016; Lei et al., 2019). Several RPA-based
portable devices are already available for POC detection of
human pathogens (Ereku et al., 2018; Tsaloglou et al., 2018),
and assays for plant pathogen detection are rapidly developing
(Zhang et al., 2014; Hammond and Zhang, 2016; Gaige et al.,
2018). An integrated cheap prototype platform termed POCKET
(Point-Of-Care Kit for the Entire Test) was recently developed
demonstrating that combining 3D printing, microfluidics, RPA,
and a smartphone, it is possible to create an ultraportable,
inexpensive, and versatile device for analyzing multiple types
of DNA from clinics to environment to food to agriculture in a
sample-to-answer manner (Xu et al., 2020). The POCKET device
is less than 100 g and smaller than 25 cm in length.
However, RPA still presents some limitations: it allows
amplification of only small DNA fragments (<500 bp) with
long primers (30–35 nt), resulting sometimes in non-specific
amplification (Lau and Botella, 2017) and a highly variable
sensitivity (Miles et al., 2015; Babu et al., 2017; Rojas et al., 2017).
Several other techniques for the isothermal amplification of
nucleic acid exist such as rolling circle amplification (RCA),
strand displacement amplification (SDA), helicase-dependent
amplification (HDA), and nucleic acid sequence-based
amplification (NASBA). All such techniques have characteristics
that can be suitable for POC analysis in agriculture, and even
if at present only a few examples of their use in field conditions
exist, they are evolving rapidly. RCA was recently proposed for
rapid diagnostic use in human health (Cao et al., 2019; Soares
et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019), and some portable devices have
been developed (Yao et al., 2018). Several examples of the use of
RCA for plant pathogen detection exist (Davari et al., 2012; Rezk
et al., 2019), but no portable devices have been described yet
for application in agriculture. For SDA, some portable devices
have been recently developed for human health care (Song et al.,
2018; Venzac et al., 2018), so it is more than conceivable that in
the next few years, this technique will be applied also for POC
analysis in plant pathogen detection.
Another promising isothermal technique for amplification
of genetic material is HDA, which was used in agriculture
for the detection of tomato spotted wilt virus (Wu et al.,
promising technique for POC analysis (Notomi et al., 2015), it
still presents some limitations, such as the design of the specific
primers, that sometimes can be difficult. Several authors have
developed fast LAMP protocols that, even if not yet incorporated
in a specific portable device, were evaluated to be simpler,
faster, cheaper, and with higher sensitivity when compared with
traditional methods (Kikuchi et al., 2009; Tomlinson et al., 2010;
Villari et al., 2013). By the optimization of RT-LAMP assay, a
protocol was developed for the detection of B. xylophilus, a pine
nematode. Such protocol can distinguish between living and dead
nematodes, by detecting the presence of mRNA encoding an
expansin gene as a viability marker (Leal et al., 2014). Other
examples of optimized LAMP-based protocols include a tool
for the early detection of Heterobasidion irregulare (Sillo et al.,
2018); a fast, easy, and in-field deployable method for detection
of Pepino mosaic virus and Potato spindle tuber viroid (Mehle
et al., 2017); a LAMP protocol starting from crude plant materials
for the detection of Xanthomonas fragariae (Getaz et al., 2017);
a protocol for the detection of three different phytoplasmas
infecting fruit trees (De Jonghe et al., 2017); and an assay for the
rapid detection of Pectobacterium atrosepticum (Li et al., 2011).
Similar to PCR-based approaches, multiplexing of the samples is
possible with LAMP (Denschlag et al., 2014; Yasuhara-Bell et al.,
2018; Feng et al., 2019).
Another recently developed isothermal amplification
technique is the so-called recombinase polymerase amplification
(RPA) (Piepenburg et al., 2006). RPA is becoming a common
choice when POC analysis is required for application in
agriculture (Ahmed et al., 2018; Burkhardt et al., 2019; StrayerScherer et al., 2019) and forestry (Cha et al., 2020), as it presents
several advantages when compared to PCR and even to LAMP.
In fact, RPA does not require an initial heating step for DNA
denaturation, as it exploits enzymatic activity to separate the
double strand. Moreover, the reaction temperature is quite
low (37 to 42◦ C), and the reaction time is usually very short
(Kappagantu et al., 2017; Munawar et al., 2019). When RPA
was compared to RT-LAMP as a detection method using a
small (150 mm × 200 mm × 35 mm) and light (400 g) batterymounted portable optical isothermal device (Cha et al., 2020),
the detection limit of RPA was shown to be 10 times lower than
RT-LAMP. All these characteristics make RPA a very easy-to-use
approach, especially in developing countries when fast analysis
Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
7
October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 570862
Baldi and La Porta
Plant Pathogens Molecular Identification Approaches
TABLE 4 | List of the main isothermal amplification methods applied for POC plant pathogen detection.
Method
Target
Advantages
Disadvantages
References
Loop-mediated isothermal
amplification (LAMP)
DNA/RNA
Fast, isothermal, high sensitivity,
relatively cheap
Primer design can be difficult
Tomlinson et al. (2010); Chang et al. (2013);
Lin et al. (2015); Yaseen et al. (2015); Lu
et al. (2016); Ammour et al. (2017); Aglietti
et al. (2019); Wilisiani et al. (2019)
Recombinase polymerase
amplification (RPA)
DNA/RNA
Fast, isothermal, does not require
an initial denaturation step
Long primers needed, specificity and
sensitivity may vary
Zhang et al. (2014); Hammond and Zhang
(2016); Ahmed et al. (2018); Gaige et al.
(2018); Burkhardt et al. (2019);
Strayer-Scherer et al. (2019)
Rolling circle amplification
(RCA)
DNA/RNA
Isothermal, high sensitivity and
specificity
Expensive, the detection may be tricky
Davari et al. (2012); Rezk et al. (2019)
Displacement amplification
(SDA)
DNA/RNA
Fast, isothermal
Inefficient for amplification of long
transcript
Song et al. (2018); Venzac et al. (2018)
Helicase-dependent
amplification (HDA)
DNA
Fast, isothermal, does not require
an initial denaturation step
High optimization needed
Schwenkbier et al. (2015a,b); Wu et al.
(2016)
Nucleic acid
sequence-based
amplification (NASBA)
RNA
Fast, isothermal
Expensive
Olmos et al. (2007); Smith et al. (2007);
Scuderi et al. (2010); Tsaloglou et al. (2011);
Dobnik et al. (2014)
2016) and Phytophthora species (Schwenkbier et al., 2015a,b).
Finally, NASBA has already found application in plant pathogen
detection (Olmos et al., 2007; Scuderi et al., 2010; Dobnik et al.,
2014), but it has not yet become a standard method for this kind
of analysis, especially when POC pathogen detection is required,
even though several portable devices have been developed and
described (Smith et al., 2007; Tsaloglou et al., 2011). Some of
the possible reasons could be that NASBA is not yet a widely
known technique and the relatively high cost of the reactions
(Honsvall and Robertson, 2017).
2019), and RPA (Lei et al., 2019). A possible alternative to the
classical fluorescence-based detection methods is the so-called
surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), a technique that
exploits the signal enhancement given by metal nanoparticles
surfaces upon laser excitation (Kneipp et al., 1997). SERS has
the potential to guarantee higher performance than fluorescencebased approaches, especially for multiplex analysis, due to its
narrow and distinct spectral peaks and the possibility to use
different labeled Raman reporters (Laing et al., 2016). Indeed
SERS has been proposed as a technique of choice for the
realization of a POC tool for multiplex plant pathogen detection
(Lau et al., 2016). SERS was used in combination with RPA for the
early detection of several plant pathogens infecting Arabidopsis
thaliana before any visible symptom or at early stages of infection
(Lau et al., 2016).
The colorimetric methods represent an interesting alternative
to the fluorescence-based detection. Colorimetric sensing can
be exploited for a number of applications as it presents many
advantages, such as low costs, low equipment requirements,
possibility of multiplexing, and easy integration with microfluidic
devices. Moreover, it is possible to detect the signal by the
naked eye or using very common tools as smartphones and
cameras (Ong and Poljak, 2020). The change in color, brightness,
or intensity can be obtained using different methods that
generally include a reaction triggered by the presence of the
target amplification product. In agriculture, the application of
colorimetric testing has been proposed for POC analysis in
several species and using different methods. In some cases,
amplification products are labeled using biotinylated primers and
specifically detected by simple devices as lateral flow dipsticks
(Tomlinson et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2013; Rigano et al., 2014;
Kolm et al., 2015; Wei et al., 2018). Another colorimetric method
proposed for application in POC plant pathogen detection
exploits the formation of a large amount of pyrophosphate
ions as a byproduct of LAMP reactions (Chang et al., 2013;
Lin et al., 2015). Several other methods have been exploited
to perform POC colorimetric detection of nucleic acids for
DETECTION METHODS
In order to detect the amplification products efficiently, various
methods can be employed (Table 5). In particular, for POC tests,
the detection systems should require as few equipment as possible
to facilitate the analysis in the field. Most of the devices proposed
for POC analysis use optical or visual tools (Zhang et al., 2019).
Different principles can be exploited for the optical detection
of amplicons, such as fluorescence, chemiluminescence, and
colorimetric visualization among others. The signal can be read
by the naked eye or by the use of standard optical instruments
including CCD cameras, smartphones, and light detectors.
The fluorescence-based detection methods have been widely
employed for many years for the visualization of qPCR
amplification products, using SYBR green or TaqMan probes
to generate the signal (Holland et al., 1991). Simplicity and
high sensitivity are the main advantages of fluorescence-based
detection methods, together with the possibility of coupling
fluorescence detection tools to microfluidic devices (Neethirajan
et al., 2011). Several examples of portable devices exploiting
fluorescence detectors for POC plant pathogen analysis can be
found. Such devices combine fluorescence detectors with several
amplification methods, such as qPCR (Koo et al., 2013; DeShields
et al., 2018; Fotiou et al., 2019), LAMP (Larrea-Sarmiento et al.,
2018; Tahzima et al., 2019; Xia et al., 2019), RCA (Zhang et al.,
Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
8
October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 570862
Baldi and La Porta
Plant Pathogens Molecular Identification Approaches
TABLE 5 | List of nucleic acid detection methods suitable for POC analysis.
Detection method
Advantages
Disadvantages
Fluorescencebased
Reliable, high sensitivity, easy to
integrate into microfluidic
devices
Expensive, cannot be detected
by naked eye
Yes
Koo et al. (2013); DeShields
et al. (2018); Larrea-Sarmiento
et al. (2018); Fotiou et al.
(2019); Lei et al. (2019);
Tahzima et al. (2019); Xia et al.
(2019); Zhang et al. (2019)
Surface-enhanced
Raman scattering
(SERS)
High sensitivity, easy to
multiplex
Expensive, needs optimization,
cannot be detected by naked
eye
Yes
Lau et al. (2016)
Colorimetric
Low cost, low equipment
requirement, easy to integrate
into microfluidic devices
Lack of sensitivity and
selectivity
Yes
Chang et al. (2013); Rigano
et al. (2014); Kolm et al. (2015);
Lin et al. (2015); Wei et al.
(2018)
Bioluminescence
assay in real-time
(BART)
Real-time reading, easy data
interpretation, good tolerance
to inhibitors
Expensive, cannot be detected
by naked eye, needs
optimization
No
Kiddle et al. (2012) (GMO)
Electrochemical
High sensitivity, simple
instrumentation requirement,
easy to miniaturize
Sensitivity to electrochemically
active samples
Yes
Julich et al. (2011);
Schwenkbier et al. (2014,
2015b); Liu et al. (2020)
Magnetic
Fast, high sensitivity, easy to
integrate into portable devices
Not yet developed for plant
analysis
No
Lee et al. (2014); Orlov et al.
(2016); Khater et al. (2017)
MinION
High-throughput results, easy
detection of multiple pathogens
Not completely user friendly
Yes
Liau et al. (2019); Shaffer (2019)
plant or human pathogen detection, as for example, the use
of hydroxyl naphthol blue (HNB) (Harper et al., 2010), the
activation of peroxidase-like deoxyribozyme (PDz) (Reed et al.,
2019), pH-sensitive dyes (Hamidi and Perreault, 2019), and
silver enhancement (Dharanivasan et al., 2019). Despite many
advantages, the colorimetric detection methods still present some
drawbacks, mainly the lack of sensitivity and specificity.
Another principle that can be applied for nucleic acid
detection is bioluminescence. In particular, a recently
described bioluminescence assay in real time (BART) can
detect continuously the exponential increase in inorganic
pyrophosphate (PPi ) produced during an isothermal
amplification reaction such as LAMP (Gandelman et al.,
2010). The big advantage of BART is that it allows to simplify
greatly data interpretation and hardware requirements. This
characteristic make BART a good candidate for POC detection
of amplified nucleic acids. A combination of LAMP and BART
reactions was used for GMO detection, showing a high sensitivity
level and good tolerance to inhibitors, proving to be suitable for
field application (Kiddle et al., 2012).
A less developed, but still interesting, method for nucleic
acid detection is based on electrochemistry (Hnaiein et al.,
2008; Deiss et al., 2011). This approach showed high sensitivity
and the possibility of miniaturizing all the components of the
device very easily, making the electrochemical detection method
a good candidate for the development of portable tools for
POC analysis of plant pathogens. Another advantage of the
electrochemical approach is the independence from background
light or sample color, even though electrochemically active
samples may influence the readout. Examples of portable devices
Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
Applied for plant
pathogens
References
for the electrochemical detection of amplified DNA from plant
pathogens are already available (Julich et al., 2011; Schwenkbier
et al., 2014, 2015a). The method exploits the enzymatic-triggered
silver deposition on the electrode to read the signal both visually
and electrochemically.
It is worth to mention magnetic sensing as a promising
technique that could be potentially applied to POC analysis
of amplified genetic material. This technique requires the
labeling of the target sequence with magnetic nanoparticles
and the detection of their stray field by the use of highly
sensitive magnetic sensors (Lee et al., 2014; Orlov et al., 2016;
Khater et al., 2017). The main advantages of magnetic sensing
techniques are the high sensitivity, fast analysis time, and
the possibility to be integrated onto handheld, portable onchip systems and microfluidic devices (Devkota et al., 2015;
Giouroudi and Kokkinis, 2017).
POC SEQUENCING
When the etiological agent is not known, the pathogen
identification must rely on the use of an untargeted screening
method by extracting, preparing, and sequencing all of the
genomic material in a particular sample at once (Yeh et al., 2019).
Even though POC sequencing is not routinely applied for plant
pathogens yet, in the last few years, some portable sequencers
have been developed that allow to perform amplicon sequencing
directly in the field. The application value of portable sequencers
was illustrated for the first time during emergent outbreaks of the
Ebola and Zika virus in West Africa (Quick et al., 2016, 2017).
9
October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 570862
Baldi and La Porta
Plant Pathogens Molecular Identification Approaches
equipment (Vaser et al., 2017; van Dijk et al., 2018). A recently
developed base caller, DeepNano-blitz (Boza et al., 2020), enables
real-time data analysis without requirement of a powerful IT
facility, increasing the possibility to deploy MinION sequencing
in the field. However, the optimization, establishment, and
standardization of methods for the quantitative evaluation of
microbial composition in the environment are inevitable. PCRbased 16S rRNA analysis of bacterial community structure was
shown to be subject to biases from the PCR-related conditions.
These include the template concentration, DNA polymerase
choice, number of cycles used, amplification reaction time, and
the reaction temperature. When MinION sequencing was used
after an accurate optimization of PCR condition, it was able to
obtain bacterial community structures that were comparable in
quality with MiSeq (Fujiyoshi et al., 2020).
Point-of-care sequencing is a still evolving technology that
has shown a very fast development in portability, sequencing
accuracy, and ease of operation. All these characteristics could
make POC sequencing the gold standard of pathogen diagnosis
in the next few years.
Genome sequencing of the virus was carried out in situ by the first
portable MinION sequencer [Oxford Nanopore Technologies
(ONT) Ltd., Didcot, United Kingdom]. MinION is a portable,
real-time device for DNA and RNA sequencing. Each consumable
flow cell can generate as much as 30 Gb of DNA sequence data
or 7–12 million reads when analyzing RNA. Ultra-long reads
(hundreds of kb) are possible. Data are streamed in real time
so that analysis can be performed during the experiment, and
workflows are fully versatile. The MinION weighs under 100 g
and plugs into a PC or laptop using a high-speed USB 3.0 cable,
or used alongside the MinIT device for real-time analyses. The
MinION sequencer is commercially available on the market2
with a price that is lower than 1,000 USD (Solares et al., 2018).
Using DNA barcodes, useful for species discovery and species
identification, it was estimated that up to 1,000 barcodes can
be generated in one flow cell and that the cost per barcode
can be <2 USD (Srivathsan et al., 2018). Speed is an important
characteristic of MinION, as it is possible to perform the entire
workflow from sample preparation, through DNA extraction,
sequencing, bioinformatics, and interpretation in 2.5 h (Loit et al.,
2019). Another advantage of MinION is that it can be easily
coupled with different techniques to perform both targeted and
untargeted analysis. For targeted analysis, both PCR-based and
isothermal amplification can be used (Yamagishi et al., 2017;
Radhakrishnan et al., 2019). Whole-genome amplification can
be obtained by multiple displacement amplification (MDA), a
technique that uses the high-fidelity phi29 polymerase combined
with random hexamer primers to amplify DNA in isothermal
reaction (Spits et al., 2006). Due to its portability, affordability,
and speed in data production, the MinION sequencer found
many applications, and it was used on a mountain, in a jungle, in
the arctic, and on the International Space Station (Castro-Wallace
et al., 2017). Recently, it was successfully applied for sequencing
and assembly of a human genome with ultralong reads (Jain et al.,
2018). It was shown to be suitable for COVID-19 fast diagnosis,
and this platform is going to be further extended for diagnosing
other viruses and pathogens (Wang et al., 2020).
In plants, an open- source workflow for long-read sequences
was established in Eucalyptus. It was able to reliably and
repeatedly obtain >6.5 Gb of long−read sequencing data with a
mean read length of 13 kb and an N50 of 26 kb (Schalamun et al.,
2019). Other examples of MinION application in agriculture and
forestry include detection of pathogenic fungi (Cui et al., 2019;
Hu et al., 2019; Rajarammohan et al., 2019; Srivastava et al.,
2019; Purushotham et al., 2020), bacteria (Badial et al., 2018;
Krehenwinkel et al., 2019; Zervas et al., 2019; Fujiyoshi et al.,
2020), viruses (van der Merwe et al., 2017; Filloux et al., 2018;
Boykin et al., 2019; Della Bartola et al., 2020), and nematodes
(Eccles et al., 2018; Knot et al., 2020).
Despite the great success, the MinION technique still presents
some drawbacks. In fact, the portability of MinION comes at
the expense of sequencing accuracy, as sequencing errors often
range between 5 and 15% (Rang et al., 2018). Nevertheless,
recent improvements in chemistry, as well as the use of
consensus calling using bioinformatics tools, allowed to increase
sequencing accuracy up to 97%, comparable with standard lab
2
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE
PERSPECTIVES
The development of affordable and reliable methods for POC
detection and identification of plant pathogens is not an easy task.
There is an increasing demand for portable devices requiring
minimal instrumentation that could perform a complete analysis
directly in the field, even when used by personnel with only
minimal training. This could bring great benefits to agriculture
worldwide, as it would be possible to efficiently monitor wide
cultivated areas for the presence of dangerous pathogens and
detect them even before any symptom is actually visible. In
the same way, it would be relatively easy to analyze imported
plants and crops in order to prevent the spreading of pests
and pathogens to new areas, where they could cause enormous
damage to the local agriculture. There is also the need of
pathogen monitoring in forestry and environmental applications,
which often requires sampling in remote areas far away from
laboratory facilities.
The nucleic acid-based methods are proving to be good
candidates for POC pathogen detection, especially since new
isothermal amplification protocols have been developed. These
methods are not widely used for field screening or for the analysis
of imported plant material, probably because technical difficulties
still exist, especially when trying to develop a protocol that can
be routinely used for the detection of different pathogens in
different plant species. Also, the relatively high cost of some of the
methods, especially when applied to large-scale analysis, can be
a problem. Nevertheless, PCR-based and isothermal nucleic acid
amplification protocols coupled with fast extraction methods and
simple detection devices are being adopted for some pathogens
and crops. The development of new portable and sensitive nucleic
acid detection methods is still a growing field of research that,
in the next years, will provide exciting possibilities to both
researchers and farmers. In many cases, POC analysis can provide
a fast disease detection, have minimal risk, low cost, and provide
https://nanoporetech.com/products/minion
Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
10
October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 570862
Baldi and La Porta
Plant Pathogens Molecular Identification Approaches
a high-quality diagnostic experience for the operator. However,
traditional laboratory testing is generally more advanced and
allows a more accurate analysis, validation, and recording of
the results. There are clearly situations where each methodology
excels. Therefore, the two methodologies are going to merge and
integrate by the development of new technologies. The main
challenges that need to be addressed for POC testing are the
optimization of reliable methods for all the main pathogens
threatening agriculture worldwide, the adaptation of the existing
methods to the specific conditions that a given plant or pathogen
requires, a robust comparison to traditional technologies, and
encouraging the final users to replace the traditional detection
methods with novel ones offering significant benefits.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
REFERENCES
Blaya, J., Lloret, E., Santisima-Trinidad, A. B., Ros, M., and Pascual, J. A. (2016).
Molecular methods (digital PCR and real-time PCR) for the quantification
of low copy DNA of Phytophthora nicotianae in environmental samples. Pest.
Manag. Sci. 72, 747–753. doi: 10.1002/ps.4048
Boykin, L. M., Sseruwagi, P., Alicai, T., Ateka, E., Mohammed, I. U., Stanton,
J. A. L., et al. (2019). Tree lab: portable genomics for early detection of
plant viruses and pests in sub-saharan Africa. Genes 10:632. doi: 10.3390/
genes10090632
Boza, V., Peresini, P., Brejova, B., and Vinař, T. (2020). DeepNano-blitz: a fast base
caller for MinION nanopore sequencers. Bioinformatics 36, 4191–4192.
Buhlmann, A., Pothier, J. F., Rezzonico, F., Smits, T. H., Andreou, M., Boonham,
N., et al. (2013). Erwinia amylovora loop-mediated isothermal amplification
(LAMP) assay for rapid pathogen detection and on-site diagnosis of fire blight.
J. Microbiol. Methods 92, 332–339. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2012.12.017
Burkhardt, A., Henry, P. M., Koike, S. T., Gordon, T. R., and Martin, F. (2019).
Detection of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. fragariae from infected strawberry
plants. Plant Dis. 103, 1006–1013. doi: 10.1094/pdis-08-18-1315-re
Burnham-Marusich, A. R., Hubbard, B., Kvam, A. J., Gates-Hollingsworth, M.,
Green, H. R., Soukup, E., et al. (2018). Conservation of mannan synthesis in
fungi of the zygomycota and ascomycota reveals a broad diagnostic target.
mSphere 3:e00094-18. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00094-18
Callaway, E. (2016). Devastating wheat fungus appears in Asia for first time. Nature
532, 421–422. doi: 10.1038/532421a
Cao, H. M., Zhou, X., and Zeng, Y. (2019). Microfluidic exponential rolling
circle amplification for sensitive microRNA detection directly from biological
samples. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 279, 447–457. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.09.121
Capron, A., Stewart, D., Hrywkiw, K., Allen, K., Feau, N., Bilodeau, G., et al. (2020).
In Situ processing and efficient environmental detection (iSPEED) of tree pests
and pathogens using point-of-use real-time PCR. PLoS One 15:e0226863. doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0226863
Cassedy, A., Mullins, E., and O’Kennedy, R. (2020). Sowing seeds for the future:
the need for on-site plant diagnostics. Biotechnol. Adv. 39:107358. doi: 10.1016/
j.biotechadv.2019.02.014
Castro-Wallace, S. L., Chiu, C. Y., John, K. K., Stahl, S. E., Rubins, K. H., McIntyre,
A. B. R., et al. (2017). Nanopore DNA sequencing and genome assembly on
the international space station. Sci. Rep. 7:18022. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18
364-0
Cawthorn, D. M., Steinman, H. A., and Witthuhn, R. C. (2011). Comparative study
of different methods for the extraction of DNA from fish species commercially
available in South Africa. Food Control 22, 231–244. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.
2010.07.003
Cha, D., Kim, D., Choi, W., Park, S., and Han, H. (2020). Point-of-care diagnostic
(POCD) method for detecting Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in pinewood
using recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) with the portable optical
isothermal device (POID). PLoS One 15:e0227476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.
0227476
Chang, W. H., Yang, S. Y., Lin, C. L., Wang, C. H., Li, P. C., Chen, T. Y., et al. (2013).
Detection of viruses directly from the fresh leaves of a Phalaenopsis orchid
using a microfluidic system. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 9, 1274–1282.
doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2013.05.016
Both authors conceived and prepared the manuscript, performed
literature search, wrote and edited the manuscript. Both authors
contributed equally to the article and approved the submitted
version.
FUNDING
The study was carried out by the Grant P1611034I and
P1611005I, provided by the Research and Innovation Centre,
Fondazione Edmund Mach.
Abdalhai, M. (2016). Comparative study of rapid DNA extraction methods of
pathogenic bacteria. Am. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 4, 1–8. doi: 10.11648/j.bio.201604
01.11
Aglietti, C., Luchi, N., Pepori, A. L., Bartolini, P., Pecori, F., Raio, A., et al. (2019).
Real-time loop-mediated isothermal amplification: an early-warning tool for
quarantine plant pathogen detection. AMB Express 9:50. doi: 10.1186/s13568019-0774-9
Ahmed, F. A., Larrea-Sarmiento, A., Alvarez, A. M., and Arif, M. (2018). Genomeinformed diagnostics for specific and rapid detection of Pectobacterium species
using recombinase polymerase amplification coupled with a lateral flow device.
Sci. Rep. 8:15972. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34275-0
Alahi, M. E. E., and Mukhopadhyay, S. C. (2017). Detection methodologies for
pathogen and toxins: a review. Sensors 17:1885. doi: 10.3390/s17081885
Ammour, M. S., Bilodeau, G. J., Tremblay, D. M., Van der Heyden, H., Yaseen,
T., Varvaro, L., et al. (2017). Development of real-time isothermal amplification
assays for on-site detection of Phytophthora infestans in potato leaves. Plant Dis.
101, 1269–1277. doi: 10.1094/pdis-12-16-1780-re
Arif, M., Fletcher, J., Marek, S. M., Melcher, U., and Ochoa-Corona, F. M. (2013).
Development of a rapid, sensitive, and field-deployable razor ex biodetection
system and quantitative PCR assay for detection of phymatotrichopsis
omnivora using multiple gene targets. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 2312–2320.
doi: 10.1128/aem.03239-12
Aslam, S., Tahir, A., Aslam, M. F., Alam, M. W., Shedayi, A. A., and Sadia,
S. (2017). Recent advances in molecular techniques for the identification of
phytopathogenic fungi - a mini review. J. Plant Interact. 12, 493–504. doi:
10.1080/17429145.2017.1397205
Babu, B., Washburn, B. K., Ertek, T. S., Miller, S. H., Riddle, C. B., Knox,
G. W., et al. (2017). A field based detection method for Rose rosette virus
using isothermal probe-based Reverse transcription-recombinase polymerase
amplification assay. J. Virol. Methods 247, 81–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.
05.019
Badial, A. B., Sherman, D., Stone, A., Gopakumar, A., Wilson, V., Schneider, W.,
et al. (2018). Nanopore sequencing as a surveillance tool for plant pathogens
in plant and insect tissues. Plant Dis. 102, 1648–1652. doi: 10.1094/pdis-04-170488-re
Baidoo, R., Yan, G. P., Nagachandrabose, S., and Skantar, A. M. (2017).
Developing a real-time PCR assay for direct identification and quantification
of Pratylenchus penetrans in soil. Plant Dis. 101, 1432–1441. doi: 10.1094/pdis01-17-0117-re
Bini, A. P., Quecine, M. C., da Silva, T. M., Silva, L. D., and Labate, C. A. (2018).
Development of a quantitative real-time PCR assay using SYBR Green for early
detection and quantification of Austropuccinia psidii in Eucalyptus grandis. Eur.
J. Plant Pathol. 150, 735–746. doi: 10.1007/s10658-017-1321-7
Blaser, S., Diem, H., von Felten, A., Gueuning, M., Andreou, M., Boonham, N., et al.
(2018). From laboratory to point of entry: development and implementation of
a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)-based genetic identification
system to prevent introduction of quarantine insect species. Pest. Manag. Sci.
74, 1504–1512. doi: 10.1002/ps.4866
Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
11
October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 570862
Baldi and La Porta
Plant Pathogens Molecular Identification Approaches
Feng, W. Z., Hieno, A., Kusunoki, M., Suga, H., and Kageyama, K. (2019). LAMP
detection of four plant-pathogenic oomycetes and its application in lettuce
fields. Plant Dis. 103, 298–307. doi: 10.1094/pdis-05-18-0858-re
Filloux, D., Fernandez, E., Loire, E., Claude, L., Galzi, S., Candresse, T., et al.
(2018). Nanopore-based detection and characterization of yam viruses. Sci. Rep.
8:17879. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36042-7
Fotiou, I. S., Pappi, P. G., Efthimiou, K. E., Katis, N. I., and Maliogka, V. I. (2019).
Development of one-tube real-time RT-qPCR for the universal detection and
quantification of Plum pox virus (PPV). J. Virol. Methods 263, 10–13. doi:
10.1016/j.jviromet.2018.10.006
Fujiyoshi, S., Muto-Fujita, A., and Maruyama, F. (2020). Evaluation of PCR
conditions for characterizing bacterial communities with full-length 16S rRNA
genes using a portable nanopore sequencer. Sci. Rep. 10:12580. doi: 10.1038/
s41598-020-69450-9
Fukuta, S., Anai, N., Kato, M., Yoshimura, Y., Fukaya, M., Yabe, K., et al.
(2005). Simplification of template DNA preparation for the loop-mediated
isothermal amplification (LAMP) method to detect tomato yellow leaf curl
virus. Annu. Rep. Kansai Plant Protect. Soc. 47, 37–41. doi: 10.4165/kapps.
47.37
Gaige, A. R., Dung, J. K. S., and Weiland, J. E. (2018). A rapid, sensitive and fielddeployable isothermal assay for the detection of Verticillium alfalfae. Can. J.
Plant Pathol. 40, 408–416. doi: 10.1080/07060661.2018.1474262
Gandelman, O. A., Church, V. L., Moore, C. A., Kiddle, G., Carne, C. A.,
Parmar, S., et al. (2010). Novel bioluminescent quantitative detection of nucleic
acid amplification in real-time. PLoS One 5:e14155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.
0014155
Getaz, M., Buhlmann, A., Schneeberger, P. H. H., Van Malderghem, C., Duffy,
B., Maes, M., et al. (2017). A diagnostic tool for improved detection of
Xanthomonas fragariae using a rapid and highly specific LAMP assay designed
with comparative genomics. Plant Pathol. 66, 1094–1102. doi: 10.1111/ppa.
12665
Ghelardini, L., Luchi, N., Pecori, F., Pepori, A. L., Danti, R., Della Rocca, G., et al.
(2017). Ecology of invasive forest pathogens. Biol. Invasions 19, 3183–3200.
doi: 10.1007/s10530-017-1487-0
Ghosh, D. K., Kokane, S. B., Kokane, A. D., Warghane, A. J., Motghare, M. R.,
Bhose, S., et al. (2018). Development of a recombinase polymerase based
isothermal amplification combined with lateral flow assay (HLB-RPA-LFA) for
rapid detection of "Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus". PLoS One 13:e0208530.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208530
Giampetruzzi, A., Saponari, M., Loconsole, G., Boscia, D., Savino, V. N., Almeida,
R. P. P., et al. (2017). Genome-wide analysis provides evidence on the genetic
relatedness of the emergent Xylella fastidiosa genotype in Italy to isolates
from Central America. Phytopathology 107, 816–827. doi: 10.1094/phyto-1216-0420-r
Giouroudi, I., and Kokkinis, G. (2017). Recent advances in magnetic microfluidic
biosensors. Nanomaterials 7:171. doi: 10.3390/nano7070171
Gluck-Thaler, E., and Slot, J. C. (2015). Dimensions of horizontal gene transfer
in eukaryotic microbial pathogens. PLoS Pathog. 11:e1005156. doi: 10.1371/
journal.ppat.1005156
Gorris, M. T., Alarcon, B., Lopez, M. M., and Cambra, M. (1994). Characterization
of monoclonal-antibodies specific for erwinia-carotovora subsp atroseptica and
comparison of serological methods for its sensitive detection on potato-tubers.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 2076–2085.
Hamidi, S. V., and Perreault, J. (2019). Simple rolling circle amplification
colorimetric assay based on pH for target DNA detection. Talanta 201, 419–425.
doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.04.003
Hammond, R. W., and Zhang, S. L. (2016). Development of a rapid diagnostic
assay for the detection of tomato chlorotic dwarf viroid based on isothermal
reverse-transcription-recombinase polymerase amplification. J. Virol. Methods
236, 62–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2016.06.013
Harper, S. J., Ward, L. I., and Clover, G. R. G. (2010). Development of LAMP
and real-time PCR methods for the rapid detection of Xylella fastidiosa for
quarantine and field applications. Phytopathology 100, 1282–1288. doi: 10.1094/
phyto-06-10-0168
Hayden, R. T., Gu, Z., Ingersoll, J., Abdul-Ali, D., Shi, L., Pounds, S., et al. (2013).
Comparison of droplet digital PCR to real-time PCR for quantitative detection
of cytomegalovirus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51, 540–546. doi: 10.1128/jcm.02620-12
Chen, H., Liu, K. K., Li, Z., and Wang, P. (2019). Point of care testing for infectious
diseases. Clin. Chim. Acta 493, 138–147. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.03.008
Cheng, H. R., and Jiang, N. (2006). Extremely rapid extraction of DNA from
bacteria and yeasts. Biotechnol. Lett. 28, 55–59. doi: 10.1007/s10529-005-4688-z
Cho, I. H., and Irudayaraj, J. (2013). In-situ immuno-gold nanoparticle network
ELISA biosensors for pathogen detection. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 164, 70–75.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.02.025
Costa, J., Mafra, I., Kuchta, T., and Oliveira, M. (2012). Single-tube nested real-time
PCR as a new highly sensitive approach to trace hazelnut. J. Agric. Food Chem.
60, 8103–8110. doi: 10.1021/jf302898z
Cui, C. M., Herlihy, J. H., Bombarely, A., McDowell, J. M., and Haak, D. C. (2019).
Draft assembly of Phytophthora capsici from long-read sequencing uncovers
complexity. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 32, 1559–1563. doi: 10.1094/mpmi04-19-0103-ta
Dairawan, M., and Shetty, P. J. (2020). The evolution of DNA extraction methods.
Am. J. Biomed. Sci. Res. 8, 39–45.
Danks, C., and Barker, I. (2000). On-site detection of plant pathogens using lateralflow devices. EPPO Bull. 30, 421–426. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2338.2000.tb00
922.x
Davari, M., van Diepeningen, A. D., Babai-Ahari, A., Arzanlou, M., Najafzadeh,
M. J., van der Lee, T. A. J., et al. (2012). Rapid identification of Fusarium
graminearum species complex using rolling circle amplification (RCA).
J. Microbiol. Methods 89, 63–70. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2012.01.017
De Boer, S. H., and Lopez, M. M. (2012). New grower-friendly methods for
plant pathogen monitoring. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 50, 197–218. doi: 10.1146/
annurev-phyto-081211-172942
De Jonghe, K., De Roo, I., and Maes, M. (2017). Fast and sensitive on-site
isothermal assay (LAMP) for diagnosis and detection of three fruit tree
phytoplasmas. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 147, 749–759. doi: 10.1007/s10658-0161039-y
Deiss, F., Laurent, S., Descamps, E., Livache, T., and Sojic, N. (2011). Optoelectrochemical nanosensor array for remote DNA detection. Analyst 136,
327–331. doi: 10.1039/c0an00501k
Della Bartola, M., Byrne, S., and Mullins, E. (2020). Characterization of potato virus
Y isolates and assessment of nanopore sequencing to detect and genotype potato
viruses. Viruses Basel 12:478. doi: 10.3390/v12040478
Denschlag, C., Rieder, J., Vogel, R. F., and Niessen, L. (2014). Real-time loopmediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for group specific detection
of important trichothecene producing Fusarium species in wheat. Int. J. Food
Microbiol. 177, 117–127. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.02.010
DeShields, J. B., Bomberger, R. A., Woodhall, J. W., Wheeler, D. L., Moroz,
N., Johnson, D. A., et al. (2018). On-site molecular detection of soil-borne
phytopathogens using a portable real-time PCR system. Jove J. Vis. Exp.
132:e56891. doi: 10.3791/56891
Devkota, J., Kokkinis, G., Berris, T., Jamalieh, M., Cardoso, S., Cardoso, F.,
et al. (2015). A novel approach for detection and quantification of magnetic
nanomarkers using a spin valve GMR-integrated microfluidic sensor. RSC Adv.
5, 51169–51175. doi: 10.1039/c5ra09365a
Dharanivasan, G., Jesse, D. M. I., Rajamuthuramalingam, T., Rajendran, G.,
Shanthi, S., and Kathiravan, K. (2019). Scanometric detection of tomato leaf
curl new delhi viral DNA using mono- and bifunctional AuNP-conjugated
oligonucleotide probes. ACS Omega 4, 10094–10107. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.
9b00340
Dobnik, D., Morisset, D., Lenarcic, R., and Ravnikar, M. (2014). Simultaneous
detection of RNA and DNA targets based on multiplex isothermal
amplification. J. Agric. Food Chem. 62, 2989–2996. doi: 10.1021/jf5002149
Donoso, A., and Valenzuela, S. (2018). In-field molecular diagnosis of plant
pathogens: recent trends and future perspectives. Plant Pathol. 67, 1451–1461.
doi: 10.1111/ppa.12859
Eccles, D., Chandler, J., Camberis, M., Henrissat, B., Koren, S., Le Gros, G.,
et al. (2018). De novo assembly of the complex genome of Nippostrongylus
brasiliensis using MinION long reads. BMC Biol. 16:6. doi: 10.1186/s12915-0170473-4
Ereku, L. T., Mackay, R. E., Craw, P., Naveenathayalan, A., Stead, T., Branavan,
M., et al. (2018). RPA using a multiplexed cartridge for low cost point of
care diagnostics in the field. Anal. Biochem. 547, 84–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2018.
02.010
Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
12
October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 570862
Baldi and La Porta
Plant Pathogens Molecular Identification Approaches
Lai, D. W., Zhang, Y. L., Huang, Q. X., Yin, G. H., Pennerman, K. K., Liu, Z. X.,
et al. (2018). Reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification to
rapidly detect Rice ragged stunt virus. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 25, 1577–1584. doi:
10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.02.024
Laing, S., Gracie, K., and Faulds, K. (2016). Multiplex in vitro detection using SERS.
Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 1901–1918. doi: 10.1039/c5cs00644a
Larrea-Sarmiento, A., Dhakal, U., Boluk, G., Fatdal, L., Alvarez, A., StrayerScherer, A., et al. (2018). Development of a genome-informed loop-mediated
isothermal amplification assay for rapid and specific detection of Xanthomonas
euvesicatoria. Sci. Rep. 8:14298. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32295-4
Lau, H. Y., and Botella, J. R. (2017). Advanced DNA-based point-of-care diagnostic
methods for plant diseases detection. Front. Plant Sci. 8:2016. doi: 10.3389/fpls.
2017.02016
Lau, H. Y., Wang, Y. L., Wee, E. J. H., Botella, J. R., and Trau, M. (2016). Field
demonstration of a multiplexed point-of-care diagnostic platform for plant
pathogens. Anal. Chem. 88, 8074–8081. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01551
Leal, I., Allen, E., Foord, B., Anema, J., Reisle, C., Uzunovic, A., et al.
(2014). Detection of living Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in wood, using reverse
transcriptase loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP). Forest
Pathol. 45, 134–148. doi: 10.1111/efp.12149
Lee, H., Xu, L. F., Koh, D., Nyayapathi, N., and Oh, K. W. (2014). Various on-chip
sensors with microfluidics for biological applications. Sensors 14, 17008–17036.
doi: 10.3390/s140917008
Lei, R., Kong, J., Qiu, Y. H., Chen, N. Z., Zhu, S. F., Wang, X. Y., et al. (2019).
Rapid detection of the pathogenic fungi causing blackleg of Brassica napus
using a portable real-time fluorescence detector. Food Chem. 288, 57–67. doi:
10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.02.089
Li, X., Nie, J. B., Ward, L. J., Nickerson, J., and De Boer, S. H. (2011). Development
and evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for rapid
detection and identification of Pectobacterium atrosepticum. Can. J. Plant
Pathol. 33, 447–457. doi: 10.1080/07060661.2011.603751
Liau, Y., Cree, S. L., Maggo, S., Miller, A. L., Pearson, J. F., Gladding, P. A.,
et al. (2019). A multiplex pharmacogenetics assay using the MinION nanopore
sequencing device. Pharmacogenet. Genomics 29, 207–215. doi: 10.1097/FPC.
0000000000000385
Lin, C. L., Chang, W. H., Wang, C. H., Lee, C. H., Chen, T. Y., Jan, F. J.,
et al. (2015). A microfluidic system integrated with buried optical fibers for
detection of Phalaenopsis orchid pathogens. Biosens. Bioelectron. 63, 572–579.
doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.08.013
Liu, Y. J., Wang, Y. L., Wang, Q., Zhang, Y. H., Shen, W. X., Li, R. H., et al. (2019).
Development of a sensitive and reliable reverse transcription droplet digital
PCR assay for the detection of citrus yellow vein clearing virus. Arch. Virol. 164,
691–697. doi: 10.1007/s00705-018-04123-7
Liu, Z., Lei, S., Zou, L., Li, G., and Ye, B. (2020). Grafting homogenous
electrochemical biosensing strategy based on reverse proximity ligation and
Exo III assisted target circulation for multiplexed communicable disease DNA
assay. Biosens. Bioelectron. 167:112487. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112487
Loit, K., Adamson, K., Bahram, M., Puusepp, R., Anslan, S., Kiiker, R., et al. (2019).
Relative performance of MinION (oxford nanopore technologies) versus sequel
(pacific biosciences) third-generation sequencing instruments in identification
of agricultural and forest fungal pathogens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85:e0136819. doi: 10.1128/aem.01368-19
Lu, W. J., Wang, J. D., Wu, Q., Sun, J. S., Chen, Y. P., Zhang, L., et al. (2016).
High-throughput sample-to-answer detection of DNA/RNA in crude samples
within functionalized micro-pipette tips. Biosens. Bioelectron. 75, 28–33. doi:
10.1016/j.bios.2015.08.016
Marcelletti, S., and Scortichini, M. (2016). Xylella fastidiosa CoDiRO strain
associated with the olive quick decline syndrome in southern Italy belongs
to a clonal complex of the subspecies pauca that evolved in Central America.
Microbiol. SGM 162, 2087–2098. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000388
Martinelli, F., Scalenghe, R., Davino, S., Panno, S., Scuderi, G., Ruisi, P., et al.
(2015). Advanced methods of plant disease detection. A review. Agron. Sustain.
Dev. 35, 1–25. doi: 10.1007/s13593-014-0246-1
McDonald, B. A., and Stukenbrock, E. H. (2016). Rapid emergence of pathogens in
agro-ecosystems: global threats to agricultural sustainability and food security.
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 371:20160026. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.
0026
Hindson, B. J., Ness, K. D., Masquelier, D. A., Belgrader, P., Heredia, N. J.,
Makarewicz, A. J., et al. (2011). High-throughput droplet digital PCR system
for absolute quantitation of DNA copy number. Anal. Chem. 83, 8604–8610.
doi: 10.1021/ac202028g
Hnaiein, M., Hassen, W. M., Abdelghani, A., Fournier-Wirth, C., Coste, J.,
Bessueille, F., et al. (2008). A conductometric immunosensor based on
functionalized magnetite nanoparticles for E. coli detection. Electrochem.
Commun. 10, 1152–1154. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2008.04.009
Holland, P. M., Abramson, R. D., Watson, R., and Gelfand, D. H. (1991).
Detection of specific polymerase chain reaction product by utilizing the 5’—-3’
exonuclease activity of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 88, 7276–7280. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.16.7276
Honsvall, B. K., and Robertson, L. J. (2017). From research lab to standard
environmental analysis tool: will NASBA make the leap? Water Res. 109,
389–397. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.052
Hu, Y. H., Green, G. S., Milgate, A. W., Stone, E. A., Rathjen, J. P., and
Schwessinger, B. (2019). Pathogen detection and microbiome analysis of
infected wheat using a portable DNA sequencer. Phytobiomes J. 3, 92–101.
doi: 10.1094/pbiomes-01-19-0004-r
Jain, M., Koren, S., Miga, K. H., Quick, J., Rand, A. C., Sasani, T. A., et al. (2018).
Nanopore sequencing and assembly of a human genome with ultra-long reads.
Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 338–349. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4060
Julich, S., Riedel, M., Kielpinski, M., Urban, M., Kretschmer, R., Wagner, S., et al.
(2011). Development of a lab-on-a-chip device for diagnosis of plant pathogens.
Biosens. Bioelectron. 26, 4070–4075. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2011.03.035
Kappagantu, M., Villamor, D. E. V., Bullock, J. M., and Eastwell, K. C. (2017).
A rapid isothermal assay for the detection of Hop stunt viroid in hop plants
(Humulus lupulus), and its application in disease surveys. J. Virol. Methods 245,
81–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.04.002
Khan, S., Mackay, J., Liefting, L., and Ward, L. (2015). Development of a duplex
one-step RT-qPCR assay for the simultaneous detection of Apple scar skin
viroid and plant RNA internal control. J. Virol. Methods 221, 100–105. doi:
10.1016/j.jviromet.2015.04.032
Khater, M., de la Escosura-Muniz, A., and Merkoci, A. (2017). Biosensors for plant
pathogen detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 93, 72–86. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.09.
091
Kiddle, G., Hardinge, P., Buttigieg, N., Gandelman, O., Pereira, C., McElgunn, C. J.,
et al. (2012). GMO detection using a bioluminescent real time reporter (BART)
of loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) suitable for field use. BMC
Biotechnol. 12:15. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-12-15
Kikuchi, T., Aikawa, T., Oeda, Y., Karim, N., and Kanzaki, N. (2009). A
rapid and precise diagnostic method for detecting the Pinewood nematode
Bursaphelenchus xylophilus by loop-mediated isothermal amplification.
Phytopathology 99, 1365–1369. doi: 10.1094/phyto-99-12-1365
Kim, J., Johnson, M., Hill, P., and Gale, B. K. (2009). Microfluidic sample
preparation: cell lysis and nucleic acid purification. Integr. Biol. 1, 574–586.
doi: 10.1039/b905844c
Kneipp, K., Wang, Y., Kneipp, H., Perelman, L. T., Itzkan, I., Dasari, R., et al.
(1997). Single molecule detection using surface-enhanced Raman scattering
(SERS). Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1667–1670. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1667
Knot, I. E., Zouganelis, G. D., Weedall, G. D., Wich, S. A., and Rae, R. (2020).
DNA barcoding of nematodes using the MinION. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8:100.
doi: 10.3389/fevo.2020.00100
Kolm, C., Mach, R. L., Krska, R., and Brunner, K. (2015). A rapid DNA lateral flow
test for the detection of transgenic maize by isothermal amplification of the 35S
promoter. Anal. Methods 7, 129–134. doi: 10.1039/c4ay01997k
Koo, C., Malapi-Wight, M., Kim, H. S., Cifci, O. S., Vaughn-Diaz, V. L., Ma, B.,
et al. (2013). Development of a real-time microchip PCR system for portable
plant disease diagnosis. PLoS One 8:e82704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.008
2704
Krehenwinkel, H., Pomerantz, A., and Prost, S. (2019). Genetic biomonitoring and
biodiversity assessment using portable sequencing technologies: current uses
and future directions. Genes 10:858. doi: 10.3390/genes10110858
La Porta, N., Capretti, P. I. M. T., Kasanen, R., Hietala, A., and Kaviya, V.
(2008). Forest pathogens with higher damage potential due to climate change
in Europe. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 30, 177–195. doi: 10.1080/07060661.2008.
10540534
Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
13
October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 570862
Baldi and La Porta
Plant Pathogens Molecular Identification Approaches
Quick, J., Grubaugh, N. D., Pullan, S. T., Claro, I. M., Smith, A. D., Gangavarapu,
K., et al. (2017). Multiplex PCR method for MinION and Illumina sequencing
of Zika and other virus genomes directly from clinical samples. Nat. Protoc. 12,
1261–1276. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.066
Quick, J., Loman, N. J., Duraffour, S., Simpson, J. T., Severi, E., Cowley, L., et al.
(2016). Real-time, portable genome sequencing for Ebola surveillance. Nature
530, 228–232. doi: 10.1038/nature16996
Racki, N., Dreo, T., Gutierrez-Aguirre, I., Blejec, A., and Ravnikar, M. (2014).
Reverse transcriptase droplet digital PCR shows high resilience to PCR
inhibitors from plant, soil and water samples. Plant Methods 10:42. doi: 10.1186/
s13007-014-0042-6
Radhakrishnan, G. V., Cook, N., Bueno Sancho, V., Lewis, C., Persoons, A., Mitiku,
A., et al. (2019). MARPLE, a point-of-care, strain-level disease diagnostics and
surveillance tool for complex fungal pathogens. BMC Biol. 17:65. doi: 10.1186/
s12915-019-0684-y
Rajarammohan, S., Paritosh, K., Pental, D., and Kaur, J. (2019). Comparative
genomics of Alternaria species provides insights into the pathogenic lifestyle
of Alternaria brassicae - a pathogen of the Brassicaceae family. BMC Genomics
20:1036. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6414-6
Ramakrishnan, B., Venkateswarlu, K., Sethunathan, N., and Megharaj, M. (2019).
Local applications but global implications: can pesticides drive microorganisms
to develop antimicrobial resistance? Sci. Total Environ. 654, 177–189. doi: 10.
1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.041
Rang, F. J., Kloosterman, W. P., and de Ridder, J. (2018). From squiggle to basepair:
computational approaches for improving nanopore sequencing read accuracy.
Genome Biol. 19:90. doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1462-9
Rani, A., Donovan, N., and Mantri, N. (2019). Review: the future of plant pathogen
diagnostics in a nursery production system. Biosens. Bioelectron. 145:111631.
doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111631
Reed, A. J., Connelly, R. P., Williams, A., Tran, M., Shim, B. S., Choe, H., et al.
(2019). Label-free pathogen detection by a deoxyribozyme cascade with visual
signal readout. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 282, 945–951. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.11.
147
Rezk, A. A., Sattar, M. N., Alhudaib, K. A., and Soliman, A. M. (2019).
Identification of watermelon chlorotic stunt virus from watermelon and
zucchini in Saudi Arabia. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 41, 285–290. doi: 10.1080/
07060661.2019.1567590
Rigano, L. A., Malamud, F., Orce, I. G., Filippone, M. P., Marano, M. R., do
Amaral, A. M., et al. (2014). Rapid and sensitive detection of Candidatus
Liberibacter asiaticus by loop mediated isothermal amplification combined
with a lateral flow dipstick. BMC Microbiol. 14:86. doi: 10.1186/1471-218014-86
Rojas, J. A., Miles, T. D., Coffey, M. D., Martin, F. N., and Chilvers, M. I. (2017).
Development and application of qPCR and RPA genus- and species-specific
detection of Phytophthora sojae and P. sansomeana root rot pathogens of
soybean. Plant Dis. 101, 1171–1181. doi: 10.1094/pdis-09-16-1225-re
Savary, S., Willocquet, L., Pethybridge, S. J., Esker, P., McRoberts, N., and Nelson,
A. (2019). The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nat.
Ecol. Evol. 3, 430–439. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y
Schaad, N. W., Opgenorth, D., and Gaush, P. (2002). Real-time polymerase chain
reaction for one-hour on-site diagnosis of Pierce’s disease of grape in early
season asymptomatic vines. Phytopathology 92, 721–728. doi: 10.1094/phyto.
2002.92.7.721
Schalamun, M., Nagar, R., Kainer, D., Beavan, E., Eccles, D., Rathjen, J. P.,
et al. (2019). Harnessing the MinION: an example of how to establish
long-read sequencing in a laboratory using challenging plant tissue from
Eucalyptus pauciflora. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 19, 77–89. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.
12938
Schmidhuber, J., and Tubiello, F. N. (2007). Global food security under climate
change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 19703–19708. doi: 10.1073/pnas.
0701976104
Schwenkbier, L., Konig, S., Wagner, S., Pollok, S., Weber, J., Hentschel, M., et al.
(2014). On-site detection of Phytophthora spp.-single-stranded target DNA as
the limiting factor to improve on-chip hybridization. Microchimica Acta 181,
1669–1679. doi: 10.1007/s00604-013-1107-3
Schwenkbier, L., Pollok, S., Konig, S., Urban, M., Werres, S., Cialla-May, D., et al.
(2015a). Towards on-site testing of Phytophthora species. Anal. Methods 7,
211–217. doi: 10.1039/c4ay02287d
Mehle, N., Kogovsek, P., Racki, N., Jakomin, T., Gutierrez-Aguirre, I., Kramberger,
P., et al. (2017). Filling the gaps in diagnostics of Pepino mosaic virus and Potato
spindle tuber viroid in water and tomato seeds and leaves. Plant Pathol. 66,
1191–1201. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12710
Miles, T. D., Martin, F. N., and Coffey, M. D. (2015). Development of rapid
isothermal amplification assays for detection of Phytophthora spp. in plant
tissue. Phytopathology 105, 265–278. doi: 10.1094/phyto-05-14-0134-r
Minguzzi, S., Terlizzi, F., Lanzoni, C., Pollini, C. P., and Ratti, C. (2016). A
rapid protocol of crude RNA/DNA extraction for RT-qPCR detection and
quantification of ’Candidatus Phytoplasma prunorum’. PLoS One 11:e0146515.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146515
Munawar, M., Toljamo, A., Martin, F., and Kokko, H. (2019). Recombinase
Polymerase Amplification Assay for fast, sensitive and on-site detection of
Phytophthora cactorum without DNA extraction. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 84, 14–19.
doi: 10.17660/eJHS.2019/84.1.2
Narayanasamy, P. (2011). Microbial Plant Pathogens-Detection and Disease
Diagnosis Bacterial and Phytoplasmal Pathogens. Berlin: Springer.
Neethirajan, S., Kobayashi, I., Nakajima, M., Wu, D., Nandagopal, S., and Lin, F.
(2011). Microfluidics for food, agriculture and biosystems industries. Lab Chip
11, 1574–1586. doi: 10.1039/c0lc00230e
Nikitin, M., Deych, K., Grevtseva, I., Girsova, N., Kuznetsova, M., Pridannikov,
M., et al. (2018). Preserved microarrays for simultaneous detection and
identification of six fungal potato pathogens with the use of real-time PCR in
matrix format. Biosens. Basel 8:129. doi: 10.3390/bios8040129
Notomi, T., Mori, Y., Tomita, N., and Kanda, H. (2015). Loop-mediated isothermal
amplification (LAMP): principle, features, and future prospects. J. Microbiol. 53,
1–5. doi: 10.1007/s12275-015-4656-9
Notomi, T., Okayama, H., Masubuchi, H., Yonekawa, T., Watanabe, K., Amino, N.,
et al. (2000). Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids
Res. 28:e63. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.12.e63
Novakova, S., Klaudiny, J., Kollerova, E., and Subr, Z. W. (2006). Expression of a
part of the Potato virus A non-structural protein P3 in Escherichia coli for the
purpose of antibody preparation and P3 immunodetection in plant material.
J. Virol. Methods 137, 229–235. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.06.020
Olmos, A., Bertolini, E., and Cambra, M. (2007). Isothermal amplification coupled
with rapid flow-through hybridisation for sensitive diagnosis of Plum pox virus.
J. Virol. Methods 139, 111–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.09.012
Ong, D. S. Y., and Poljak, M. (2020). Smartphones as mobile microbiological
laboratories. Clin. Microbiol. Infect 26, 421–424. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.09.026
Orlov, A. V., Bragina, V. A., Nikitin, M. P., and Nikitin, P. I. (2016). Rapid dryreagent immunomagnetic biosensing platform based on volumetric detection
of nanoparticles on 3D structures. Biosens. Bioelectron. 79, 423–429. doi: 10.
1016/j.bios.2015.12.049
Osman, F., Dang, T., Bodaghi, S., and Vidalakis, G. (2017). One-step multiplex RTqPCR detects three citrus viroids from different genera in a wide range of hosts.
J. Virol. Methods 245, 40–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.03.007
Pallas, V., Sanchez-Navarro, J. A., and James, D. (2018). Recent advances on the
multiplex molecular detection of plant viruses and viroids. Front. Microbiol.
9:2087. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02087
Papayiannis, L. C. (2014). Diagnostic real-time RT-PCR for the simultaneous
detection of Citrus exocortis viroid and Hop stunt viroid. J. Virol. Methods 196,
93–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.11.001
Paul, R., Ostermann, E., Gu, Z., Ristaino, J., and Wei, Q. (2020). DNA extraction
from plant leaves using a microneedle patch. Curr. Protoc. Plant Biol. 5:e20104.
doi: 10.1002/cppb.20104
Paul, R., Saville, A. C., Hansel, J. C., Ye, Y. Q., Ball, C., Williams, A., et al. (2019).
Extraction of plant DNA by microneedle patch for rapid detection of plant
diseases. ACS Nano 13, 6540–6549. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b00193
Peeling, R. W., Holmes, K. K., Mabey, D., and Ronald, A. (2006). Rapid tests for
sexually transmitted infections (STIs): the way forward. Sex. Trans. Infect. 82,
V1–V6. doi: 10.1136/sti.2006.024265
Piepenburg, O., Williams, C. H., Stemple, D. L., and Armes, N. A. (2006). DNA
detection using recombination proteins. PLoS Biol. 4:1115–1121. doi: e20410.
1371/journal.pbio.0040204
Purushotham, N., Jones, A., Poudel, B., Nasim, J., Adorada, D., Sparks, A., et al.
(2020). Draft genome resource for Macrophomina phaseolina associated with
charcoal rot in sorghum. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 33, 724–726. doi: 10.1094/
mpmi-12-19-0356-a
Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
14
October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 570862
Baldi and La Porta
Plant Pathogens Molecular Identification Approaches
Tsaloglou, M. N., Bahi, M. M., Waugh, E. M., Morgan, H., and Mowlem,
M. (2011). On-chip real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification for
RNA detection and amplification. Anal. Methods 3, 2127–2133. doi: 10.1039/
c1ay05164d
Tsaloglou, M. N., Nemiroski, A., Camci-Unal, G., Christodouleas, D. C., Murray,
L. P., Connelly, J. T., et al. (2018). Handheld isothermal amplification and
electrochemical detection of DNA in resource-limited settings. Anal. Biochem.
543, 116–121. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2017.11.025
van der Merwe, M., Jukes, M. D., Rabalski, L., Knox, C., Opoku-Debrah,
J. K., Moore, S. D., et al. (2017). Genome analysis and genetic stability
of the Cryptophlebia leucotreta granulovirus (CrleGV-SA) after 15 Years of
commercial use as a biopesticide. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18:2327. doi: 10.3390/
ijms18112327
van Dijk, E. L., Jaszczyszyn, Y., Naquin, D., and Thermes, C. (2018). The third
revolution in sequencing technology. Trends Genet. 34, 666–681. doi: 10.1016/
j.tig.2018.05.008
Varma, A., Padh, H., and Shrivastava, N. (2007). Plant genomic DNA isolation: an
art or a science. Biotechnol. J. 2, 386–392. doi: 10.1002/biot.200600195
Vaser, R., Sovic, I., Nagarajan, N., and Sikic, M. (2017). Fast and accurate de
novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Res. 27, 737–746.
doi: 10.1101/gr.214270.116
Venzac, B., Diakite, M. L., Herthnek, D., Cisse, I., Bockelmann, U., Descroix,
S., et al. (2018). On-chip conductometric detection of short DNA sequences
via electro-hydrodynamic aggregation. Analyst 143, 190–199. doi: 10.1039/
c7an00798a
Vidic, J., Vizzini, P., Manzano, M., Kavanaugh, D., Ramarao, N., Zivkovic, M.,
et al. (2019). Point-of-need DNA testing for detection of foodborne pathogenic
bacteria. Sensors 19:1100. doi: 10.3390/s19051100
Villari, C., Tomlinson, J., Battisti, A., Boonham, N., Capretti, P., and Faccoli,
M. (2013). Use of loop-mediated isothermal amplification for detection of
Ophiostoma clavatum, the primary blue stain fungus associated with Ips
acuminatus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 2527–2533. doi: 10.1128/aem.0361212
Voegel, T. M., and Nelson, L. M. (2018). Quantification of agrobacterium vitis from
grapevine nursery stock and vineyard soil using droplet digital PCR. Plant Dis.
102, 2136–2141. doi: 10.1094/pdis-02-18-0342-re
Wambua, L., Schneider, B., Olcvvaro, A., Wanga, J. O., Imali, O., Wambua, P. N.,
et al. (2017). Development of field-applicable tests for rapid and sensitive
detection of Candidatus Phytoplasma oryzae. Mol. Cell. Probes 35, 44–56. doi:
10.1016/j.mcp.2017.06.004
Wang, M., Fu, A. S., Hu, B., Tong, Y. Q., Liu, R., Liu, Z., et al. (2020). Nanopore
targeted sequencing for the accurate and comprehensive detection of SARSCoV-2 and other respiratory viruses. Small 16:2002169. doi: 10.1002/smll.
202002169
Wei, S. Q., Sun, Y. J., Xi, G. S., Zhang, H. J., Xiao, M. Y., and Yin, R. (2018).
Development of a single-tube nested PCR-lateral flow biosensor assay for rapid
and accurate detection of Alternaria panax Whetz. PLoS One 13:e0206462.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206462
Wilisiani, F., Tomiyama, A., Katoh, H., Hartono, S., Neriya, Y., Nishigawa, H.,
et al. (2019). Development of a LAMP assay with a portable device for realtime detection of begomoviruses under field conditions. J. Virol. Methods 265,
71–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2018.10.005
Wingfield, M. J., Garnas, J. R., Hajek, A., Hurley, B. P., de Beer, Z. W., and
Taerum, S. J. (2016). Novel and co-evolved associations between insects and
microorganisms as drivers of forest pestilence. Biol. Invasions 18, 1045–1056.
doi: 10.1007/s10530-016-1084-7
Wu, X. H., Chen, C. F., Xiao, X. Z., and Deng, M. J. (2016). Development of
reverse transcription thermostable helicase-dependent DNA amplification for
the detection of tomato spotted wilt virus. J. AOAC Int. 99, 1596–1599. doi:
10.5740/jaoacint.16-0132
Xia, H., Zhao, N., Zhao, L., Wang, Y. J., Zhao, W., and Yuan, Z. M. (2019). Rapid
detection of Banna virus by reverse transcription-loop -mediated isothermal
amplification (RT-LAMP). Int. J. Infect. Dis. 78, 93–98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.
10.025
Xu, H., Xia, A., Wang, D., Zhang, Y., Deng, S., Lu, W., et al. (2020). An ultraportable
and versatile point-of-care DNA testing platform. Sci. Adv. 6:eaaz7445. doi:
10.1126/sciadv.aaz7445
Schwenkbier, L., Pollok, S., Rudloff, A., Sailer, S., Cialla-May, D., Weber, K.,
et al. (2015b). Non-instrumented DNA isolation, amplification and microarraybased hybridization for a rapid on-site detection of devastating Phytophthora
kernoviae. Analyst 140, 6610–6618. doi: 10.1039/c5an00855g
Scuderi, G., Golmohammadi, M., Cubero, J., Lopez, M. M., Cirvilleri, G., and
Llop, P. (2010). Development of a simplified NASBA protocol for detecting
viable cells of the citrus pathogen Xanthomonas citri subsp citri under different
treatments. Plant Pathol. 59, 764–772. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02305.x
Selvaraj, V., Maheshwari, Y., Hajeri, S., Chen, J. C., McCollum, T. G., and
Yokomi, R. (2018). Development of a duplex droplet digital PCR assay for
absolute quantitative detection of "Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus". PLoS One
13:e0197184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197184
Shaffer, L. (2019). “Inner workings: portable dna sequencer helps farmers stymie
devastating viruses,” in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116,
3351–3353. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1901806116
Sillo, F., Giordano, L., and Gonthier, P. (2018). Fast and specific detection of the
invasive forest pathogen Heterobasidion irregulare through a Loop-mediated
isothermal AMPlification (LAMP) assay. Forest Pathol. 48:e12396. doi: 10.1111/
efp.12396
Silva, G., Oyekanmi, J., Nkere, C. K., Bomer, M., Kumar, P. L., and Seal, S. E. (2018).
Rapid detection of potyviruses from crude plant extracts. Anal. Biochem. 546,
17–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2018.01.019
Smith, M. C., Steimle, G., Ivanov, S., Holly, M., and Fries, D. P. (2007). An
integrated portable hand-held analyser for real-time isothermal nucleic acid
amplification. Anal. Chim. Acta 598, 286–294. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2007.07.036
Soares, R. R. G., Neumann, F., Caneira, C. R. F., Madaboosi, N., Ciftci, S.,
Hernandez-Neuta, I., et al. (2019). Silica bead-based microfluidic device with
integrated photodiodes for the rapid capture and detection of rolling circle
amplification products in the femtomolar range. Biosens. Bioelectron. 128,
68–75. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2018.12.004
Solares, E. A., Chakraborty, M., Miller, D. E., Kalsow, S., Hall, K., Perera, A. G.,
et al. (2018). Rapid low-cost assembly of the Drosophila melanogaster reference
genome using low-coverage, long-read sequencing. G3 (Bethesda) 8, 3143–3154.
doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200162
Song, J. Z., Liu, C. C., Mauk, M. G., Peng, J., Schoenfeld, T., and Bau, H. H.
(2018). A multifunctional reactor with dry-stored reagents for enzymatic
amplification of nucleic acids. Anal. Chem. 90, 1209–1216. doi: 10.1021/acs.
analchem.7b03834
Spits, C., Le Caignec, C., De Rycke, M., Van Haute, L., Van Steirteghem, A.,
Liebaers, I., et al. (2006). Whole-genome multiple displacement amplification
from single cells. Nat. Protoc. 1, 1965–1970. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.326
Srivastava, S., Abad, Z. G., Knight, L. M., Rivera, Y., Zeller, K. A., Mavrodieva, V. A.,
et al. (2019). High-throughput sequencing of Phytophthora ramorum Ex-type
using long-read MinION nanopore sequencing. Phytopathology 109, 186–186.
Srivathsan, A., Baloglu, B., Wang, W., Tan, W. X., Bertrand, D., Ng, A. H. Q., et al.
(2018). A MinION-based pipeline for fast and cost-effective DNA barcoding.
Mol. Ecol. Resour. 18, 1035–1049. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12890
Strayer-Scherer, A., Jones, J. B., and Paret, M. L. (2019). Recombinase polymerase
amplification assay for field detection of tomato bacterial spot pathogens.
Phytopathology 109, 690–700. doi: 10.1094/phyto-03-18-0101-r
Suzuki, R., Fukuta, S., Matsumoto, Y., Hasegawa, T., Kojima, H., Hotta, M.,
et al. (2016). Development of reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal
amplification assay as a simple detection method of Chrysanthemum stem
necrosis virus in chrysanthemum and tomato. J. Virol. Methods 236, 29–34.
doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2016.07.005
Tahzima, R., Foucart, Y., Peusens, G., Belien, T., Massart, S., and De Jonghe, K.
(2019). New sensitive and fast detection of Little cherry virus 1 using loopmediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP). J. Virol. Methods 265, 91–98.
doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2018.12.019
Tomlinson, J. A., Boonham, N., Hughes, K. J. D., Griffen, R. L., and Barker,
I. (2005). On-site DNA extraction and real-time PCR for detection of
Phytophthora ramorum in the field. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 6702–6710.
doi: 10.1128/aem.71.11.6702-6710.2005
Tomlinson, J. A., Dickinson, M. J., and Boonham, N. (2010). Rapid detection
of Phytophthora ramorum and P. kernoviae by two-minute DNA extraction
followed by isothermal amplification and amplicon detection by generic lateral
flow device. Phytopathology 100, 143–149. doi: 10.1094/phyto-100-2-0143
Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
15
October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 570862
Baldi and La Porta
Plant Pathogens Molecular Identification Approaches
Yamagishi, J., Runtuwene, L. R., Hayashida, K., Mongan, A. E., Thi, L. A. N., Thuy,
L. N., et al. (2017). Serotyping dengue virus with isothermal amplification and
a portable sequencer. Sci. Rep. 7:3510. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03734-5
Yang, L. L., Sun, L. X., Ruan, X. L., Qiu, D. Y., Chen, D. H., Cai, X. Q., et al.
(2015). Development of a single-tube duplex real-time fluorescence method
for the rapid quantitative detection of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp cubense race
1 (FOC1) and race 4 (FOC4) using TaqMan probes. Crop Protect. 68, 27–35.
doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2014.11.004
Yao, Q., Wang, Y. Q., Wang, J., Chen, S. M., Liu, H. Y., Jiang, Z. R., et al. (2018). An
ultrasensitive diagnostic biochip based on biomimetic periodic nanostructureassisted rolling circle amplification. ACS Nano 12, 6777–6783. doi: 10.1021/
acsnano.8b01950
Yaseen, T., Drago, S., Valentini, F., Elbeaino, T., Stampone, G., Digiaro, M.,
et al. (2015). On-site detection of Xylella fastidiosa in host plants and in "spy
insects" using the real-time loop-mediated isothermal amplification method.
Phytopathol. Mediterranea 54, 488–496.
Yasuhara-Bell, J., Pedley, K. F., Farman, M., Valent, B., and Stack, J. P. (2018).
Specific detection of the wheat blast pathogen (Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum)
by loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Plant Dis. 102, 2550–2559. doi:
10.1094/pdis-03-18-0512-re
Yeh, K. B., Wood, H., Scullion, M., Russell, J. A., Parker, K., Gnade, B. T., et al.
(2019). Molecular detection of biological agents in the field: then and now.
mSphere 4:e00695-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00695-19
Yetisen, A. K. A., Muhammad, S., and Lowe, C. R. (2013). Paper-based microfluidic
point-of-care diagnostic devices. Lab Chip 13, 2210–2251.
Zervas, A., Zeng, Y. H., Madsen, A. M., and Hansen, L. H. (2019). Genomics
of aerobic photoheterotrophs in wheat phyllosphere reveals divergent
evolutionary patterns of photosynthetic genes in Methylobacterium spp.
Genome Biol. Evol. 11, 2895–2908. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evz204
Zhang, S. L., Ravelonandro, M., Russell, P., McOwen, N., Briard, P., Bohannon, S.,
et al. (2014). Rapid diagnostic detection of plum pox virus in Prunus plants by
isothermal AmplifyRP (R) using reverse transcription-recombinase polymerase
amplification. J. Virol. Methods 207, 114–120. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.
06.026
Zhang, X., Zhang, H., Pu, J. J., Qi, Y. X., Yu, Q. F., Xie, Y. X., et al.
(2013). Development of a real-time fluorescence loop-mediated isothermal
Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
amplification assay for rapid and quantitative detection of Fusarium oxysporum
f. sp cubense tropical race 4 in soil. PLoS One 8:e82841. doi: 10.1371/journal.
pone.0082841
Zhang, Z. Y., Wang, Y. F., Li, Y. L., Yu, D. S., Chen, H. Y., Cai, Y., et al. (2019).
Portable fluorescence-based microRNA detection system based on isothermal
signal amplification technology. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 66, 82–90. doi: 10.
1002/bab.1699
Zhao, L. M., Li, G., Gao, Y., Zhu, Y. R., Liu, J., and Zhu, X. P. (2015). Reverse
transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for detecting
tomato chlorosis virus. J. Virol. Methods 213, 93–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.
2014.11.013
Zheng, Y., Luo, Y., Zhou, Y.-L., Zeng, X., Duan, X., Cao, X., et al. (2013).
Real-time PCR quantification of latent infection of wheat powdery mildew
in the field. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 136, 565–575. doi: 10.1007/s10658-0130188-5
Zhong, J. L., and Zhao, X. H. (2018). Isothermal amplification technologies for
the detection of foodborne pathogens. Food Anal. Methods 11, 1543–1560.
doi: 10.1007/s12161-018-1177-2
Zhong, X., Liu, X. L., Lou, B. H., Zhou, C. Y., and Wang, X. F. (2018). Development
of a sensitive and reliable droplet digital PCR assay for the detection of
’Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’. J. Integr. Agric. 17, 483–487. doi: 10.1016/
s2095-3119(17)61815-x
Zou, Y. P., Mason, M. G., Wang, Y. L., Wee, E., Turni, C., Blackall, P. J., et al.
(2017). Nucleic acid purification from plants, animals and microbes in under
30 seconds. PLoS Biol. 15:e2003916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003916
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the
absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a
potential conflict of interest.
Copyright © 2020 Baldi and La Porta. This is an open-access article distributed
under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use,
distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original
author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication
in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use,
distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
16
October 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 570862