PLANT SCIENCE TODAY ISSN 2348-1900 (online) Vol 9(2): 477–485 https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.1476 HORIZON e-Publishing Group RESEARCH ARTICLE Authentication and quality control of Uapaca heudelotii Baill. An investigation of pharmacognostic, phytochemical and physicochemical properties of its leaves and stem bark Evelyn Asante-Kwatia*, Lord Gyimah , Abraham Yeboah Mensah , Kwame Sarpong & Ama Kusiwah Obeng Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana *Email: emireku@yahoo.com OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE HISTORY Received: 09 September 2021 Accepted: 29 December 2021 Available online Version 1.0: 05 April 2022 Additional information Peer review: Publisher thanks Sectional Editor and the other anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Reprints & permissions information is available at https://horizonepublishing.com/ journals/index.php/PST/open_access_policy Publisher’s Note: Horizon e-Publishing Group remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Indexing: Plant Science Today, published by Horizon e-Publishing Group, is covered by Scopus, Web of Science, BIOSIS Previews, Clarivate Analytics, etc. See https:// horizonepublishing.com/journals/index.php/ PST/indexing_abstracting Copyright: © The Author(s). This is an openaccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/) CITE THIS ARTICLE Kwatia E A, Gyimah L, Mensah A Y , Sarpong K, Obeng A K. Authentication and quality control of Uapaca heudelotii Baill. - An investigation of pharmacognostic, phytochemical and physicochemical properties of its leaves and stem bark. Plant Science Today 9(2): 477–485. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.1476 Abstract Uapaca heudelotii Baill. is well known in various African cultures for its application in the treatment of infections and inflammatory conditions. This study was focused on providing standard identification parameters for authentication and quality assurance of U. heudelotii through morphological observations, screening of phytochemical constituents, fluorescence, spectroscopic and physicochemical analysis. U. heudelotii leaves are simple, elliptic and arranged in whorls. The bark is greyish-brown with longitudinal striations on the outer surface and pale red on the inner surface. Leaf lamina microscopy displayed anticlinal polygonal straight-walled epidermal cells, with anisocytic stomata found only on the abaxial surface. Leaf surface constants were determined. Microscopy of powdered leaves and barks revealed the presence of epidermal cells, starch grains, calcium oxalate, sclereids and pitted vessels. Alkaloids, flavonoids, coumarins, saponins, triterpenoids, phytosterols and tannins were identified in both stem bark and leaves. The total phenolic content for the leaf and bark were 219.2 ± 10.013 and 153.9 ± 1.602 mg/g gallic acid equivalent respectively. The total flavonoid contents were recorded as 1036 ± 33.37 and 310.2 ± 79.00 mg/g quercetin equivalent for the leaf and bark respectively. The total ash for the leaf and bark was 6.41 ± 0.208 and 5.01 ± 0.258 respectively. The pH values for the aqueous and alcoholic extracts were slightly acidic (3-5). In elemental analysis, lead (Pb) was detected within the acceptable limit (0.00190.0025 mg/kg). In conclusion, the current results have provided standard parameters for the correct identification and quality assessment of U. heudelotii. Keywords Uapaca heudelotii, macro-morphology, micro-morphology, fluorescence, mineral content Introduction Phytotherapy has for the past decades seen an increased usage and wide acceptability in both developing and industrialized countries due its effectiveness and safety. This upsurge in the practice and commercialization of herbal drugs is however faced with the challenge of misidentification of closely related species and adulteration of crude materials for financial gains (1). In facing this challenge, it is fundamental that conditions to ensure correct identification and quality of samples be laid down (2). Establishing standards for proper identification, quality and safety assurance through pharmacognostic, phytochemical and physicochemical studies is thus very vital (3). Plant Science Today, ISSN 2348-1900 (online) 478 KWATIA ET AL Plant description, habit and distribution The genus Uapaca (Euphorbiaceae) consists of about 50 species with strikingly similar morphological features distributed across most of tropical Africa and Madagascar (4, 5). Uapaca heudelotii, commonly called the “sugar plum”, is a well-known species recognized for its medicinal uses in traditional medicine. It is an evergreen dioecious small to medium-sized tree with a condensed low-branching crown which bears sweet edible fruits (4, 6). The plant is usually found growing at river banks in riverine forests. Ethnomedicinal uses In folk medicine, decoctions of the stem bark are used to treat cough and cold (4, 7), fever (4, 7), headaches (4, 7), tooth-ache (7), gastrointestinal infections (7), female infertility (7), skin infections (4, 7), rheumatism (4, 7) and as enema for constipation or haemorroids (4, 6, 7). The leaves are pulped with palm-oil for external application to furuncles and to relieve migraines (7). The plant is locally called “kuntan” by the Akans in Ghana and is highly commercialized as a massage to aid toddlers late in walking (7). Biological activity and phytochemistry In a previous study, extracts from U. heudelotii demonstrated potent anti-sickling and antibacterial activity attributed to anthocyanins and organic acids (8). Various solvent fractions and flavonoid glycosides from the stem bark also showed broad spectrum antibacterial activity as well as antioxidant effect (9-11). Pharmacognostic studies The misapplication of herbs or natural products usually begins with wrong identification of species which look similar to the naked eye. Such challenges can be resolved by pharmacognostic studies. Pharmacognostic studies deal with the study of the morphological, phytochemical and physicochemical properties of a plant drug. Unlike taxonomic identification, a pharmacognostic study includes parameters which help in identifying adulteration in dry powder form also. In spite of the medicinal importance of U. heudelotti, a search in literature reveals no data on standard parameters for its quality control. Previous studies focused on investigating the foliar morphology of some Uapaca species for taxonomical purposes (5, 12). In this study, the pharmacognostic and physicochemical characteristics, elemental content, phytochemical, spectroscopic and fluorescence patterns of the stem bark and leaves of U. heudelotii were evaluated. Materials and Methods Chemicals and reagents All chemicals and reference drugs (chloral hydrate, glycerine, phloroglucinol, hydrochloric acid, iodine solution, ethanol, chloroform, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate, aluminium chloride and Folin Ciocalteu reagent, ammonia (NH3), sulphuric acid (H2SO4), hydrochloric acid (HCl), ferric chloride (FeCl3) and potassium hydroxide (KOH) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Co Ltd Irvine, UK. All organic solvents [ethanol (EtOH), petroleum ether (pet-ether), ethyl acetate (EtOAc), chloroform (CH3Cl) and methanol (MeOH)] were of analytical grade and obtained from BDH, Laboratory Supplies (Merck Ltd, Lutterworth, UK). Harvesting and processing of plant material Fresh disease-free stem barks and leaves of U. heudelotii were collected near the Asuobone River in the Afram plains district of the Eastern Region of Ghana in October, 2019.The identity of the sample was confirmed by Dr George Henry Sam of the Herbal Medicine Department, KNUST. Herbarium specimens, KNUST/HM1/2020/L003 and KNUST/HM1/2020/SB004 were placed at the herbarium of the Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, KNUST. The plant materials were cleaned to remove all foreign materials. Fresh samples were observed for gross morphological features. For microscopy, thin sections of the fresh leaf midrib, petiole and lamina were obtained using a sharp blade. The sections were cleared of all green pigments by boiling in 80% chloral hydrate for about 4 hr and stored in glycerine until investigation. About 200 g of the stem bark and leaves were cleaned, air dried at room temperature for two weeks and pulverized to obtain dried coarse powder. The powdered materials were stored in air tight containers at room temperature. Macroscopic and organoleptic evaluation For organoleptic evaluation, the taste, colour, odour and texture of whole and powdered samples were determined. The type of leaf, arrangement pattern, petiole and surface characteristics of the lamina such as shape of leaf, apex, venation, base and margin were recorded. Thirty (30) fresh leaves were selected randomly and measured for their average length and width. Pieces of the fresh stem bark were observed for peculiar characteristics on the inner and outer stem bark, fracture and curvature types (13). Microscopic evaluation The various microscopic studies were carried out using the Leica DM 750 microscope (Jos Hansen and Soehn Gmbh, Hamburg, Germany), employing a stage micrometre and a camera lucida. The fresh transverse sections of the midrib, petiole and the cleared sections of the leaf lamina were observed under the microscope mounted either in a solution of glycerine or stained with phloroglucinol (0.1%w/v) with drop of concentrated hydrochloric acid. Cell types including epidermal cells, stomata, venation etc. were observed. Photomicrographs at x10 and x40 magnifications were taken (14). Subsequently, quantitative leaf surface data including the stomatal index, palisade ratio, veinlet termination and vein islet numbers were determined using three (5) different samples of cleared leaf lamina. The number of the cell types per square millimetre (mm²) of epidermis was noted. Determinations were made from five fields of view for each sample and the results expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) (15). The stomatal index remains constant regardless of age of plant and is usually used for authentication purposes. SI was calculated by the equation: https://plantsciencetoday.online 479 where, S and E are the number of stomata and epidermal cells respectively in microscopic view field. Physicochemical parameters The total, water-soluble and acid-insoluble ashes were determined. The pH of 1% aqueous and ethanolic extracts was also determined. The mineral content and extractive values (determined using cold maceration with ethanol, water, petroleum ether and ethyl acetate) were determined for the stem bark and leaves according to previously established methods (16, 17). Phytochemical screening Preliminary phytochemical screening were carried out to identify the presence of the major classes of secondary metabolites in the plant samples (13). The total flavonoid and total phenolic contents were determined using the aluminium chloride colorimetric and Folin Ciocalteu methods respectively (18, 19). Five samples each of the stem bark and leaves were used for this assay and the results calculated as the mean ± SD. Fluorescence analysis A small quantity of the powdered plant sample was mixed with a few millilitres of solvent (water, 95% ethanol, ethyl acetate, chloroform, petroleum ether) or reagent (conc. NH3, conc H2SO4 conc, HCl, FeCl3, alcoholic KOH, iodine solution or NH3 solution). The fluorescence colours displayed by the mixtures were observed under long and short wave UV lights as well as in day light and noted (20). Elemental Content Analysis Fig. 1. Leaf and stem bark of U. heudelotii [A- leaf whorl, B- upper and lower surfaces of leaf, C- inner bark, D- outer bark]. The presence and quantities of selected minerals and metals in the leaf and stem bark of U. heudelotii was assessed cracks. It was pale-red on the inside and exuded a reddish by the Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence (17). sap when bruised (Fig. 1. CD). The stem bark broke with a Ultraviolet (UV-Vis) and Infrared (IR) Spectrometry short or fibrous fracture. Powdered stem bark felt rough, At a wavelength range of 200-800 nm and a scan speed of had a characteristic odour and bitter taste. Table 1 sum50 nm/s (PerkinElmer UV spectrophotometer), characteris- marizes the organoleptic and macroscopic characteristics tic UV fingerprints were developed for the methanol stem of the stem bark and leaf. bark and leaf extracts. Their IR spectra were also obtained Table 1. Organoleptic and macroscopic features of the leaf and stem bark of from a PerkinElmer (model 1600) Fourier Transform-IR U. heuldelottii spectrophotometer. Results Organoleptic and Macroscopic description U. heudelotii is a small to medium-sized tree with a dense low-branching crown. It bears simple leaves arranged in whorls of 7 to 8 on a single petiole. Matured leaves were dark green on the upper surface and light green on the lower surface. The leaf laminar was elliptic in shape with an acuminate to obtuse apex, entire margin, cuneate base and pinnate reticulate venation. The leaf was papery in texture and had a glabrous surface (Fig. 1. AB). The powdered leaf was coarse with a characteristic odour and a bitter taste. The stem bark appeared greyish-brown on the outer surface with longitudinal striations, mosses and Parameter Leaf Stem bark Odour Characteristic Characteristic Colour Deep green (adaxial)Light green (abaxial) Greyish- brown (outer) Pale red (inner) Texture of powder Coarse Sandy Origin - Trunk Type Simple - Arrangement Spiral/whorl - Shape Elliptic Margin Entire - Apex Acuminate - obtuse - Base Cuneate - Venation Pinnate - Glabrous Moss, Cracks Longitudinally striated Surface Plant Science Today, ISSN 2348-1900 (online) 480 KWATIA ET AL Texture Papery Rough - Short (outer surface) Fibrous (inner surface) Petiole Petiolate - Average length of leaf/cm 21.83 ± 3.04 - Average width of leaf/cm 7.11 ± 1.51 - Fracture average length is presented as the mean ±SD [n=30] Microscopic description The leaf lamina displayed anticlinal polygonal straightwalled epidermal cells on the adaxial and abaxial surfaces. The leaf was hypostomatous with anisocytic stomata distributed only on the lower surface (Fig. 2. AB). Both surfaces free ending ultimate endings (veinlet terminations) were observed (Fig. 2. C). The transverse section (T/S) of the leaf midrib had an almost circular outline and a slightly protruded adaxial surface forming a pear-like shape (Fig. 2. D). Below the cuticle was a row of irregularly shaped epidermal cells. About four to five rows of closely packed polygonal collenchyma cells, followed by loosely packed isodiametric parenchyma cells were dispersed in the cortex. Tanniferous cells were found among parenchyma in the cortex. The vascular bundle was arranged in a circular system surrounded by a sheath of ruffled lignified sclerenchyma in the core. An arch-shaped lignified xylem tissue was observed at the centre (Fig. 2. DE). The T/S of the petiole showed a similar cellular arrangement as that of the midrib. Epidermal cells in a Fig. 2. Microscopy of the leaf and stem bark of U. heudelotii [A- upper surface of fresh leaf with straight-walled epidermal cells; B- lower surface of fresh leaf with anisocytic stomata; C- veinlet terminations and vein islets; D, E- transverse section (T/S) of the midrib; F- T/S of the petiole; G- microscopy of powdered leaf and stem bark; [EP- epidermal cells, PC-parenchyma cells; CO-collenchyma cells, SC-schelenchyma cells, TN-tanniferous cells, ST-stomata, VI-vein islet, VT-veinlet termination, VB- vascular bundle, Sg- starch grain, Stc-stone cells, CaO-Calcium oxalate crystal, Ve- pitted vessel, Fi-fibre]. single row were followed by about six to eight rows of tightly were glabrous with no trichomes. Reticulate venation pat- packed collenchyma cells. Loosely packed parenchyma tern with generally four-sided vein-islets and few branched cells were observed in the cortex. Lignified sclerenchyma https://plantsciencetoday.online 481 cells arranged in a circular pattern surrounded a central vascular bundle. Several parenchyma cells occupied the core around the vascular bundles (Fig. 2F). Microscopy of the powdered leaf showed the presence of epidermal cells and starch grains, while the stem bark powder had prismatic-shaped calcium oxalate crystals, stone cells, pitted vessels and fibres (Fig. 2G). Table 4. Fluorescence analysis of the leaf and stem bark of U. heudelotii Sample + solvent / reagent Visible light UV (254nm) UV (365nm) NF U. heudelotii Leaves Powder + Water Cream Light green Powder + Ethanol (95%) Green Pink Brown Powder + Ethyl acetate Green Pink Brown Quantitative microscopy Powder + Chloroform Cream Light green Cream The leaf surface constants evaluated in this study included the stomatal number, stomatal index, vein-islet number, vein termination number and palisade ratio. The result is presented as the mean ± standard deviation (Table 2). Powder + Petroleum ether Light green Pink Brown Powder + Concentrated ammonia Brown Pink NF Powder + Concentrated sulphuric acid Brown NF NF Powder + Concentrated hydrochloric acid Green Deep green NF Powder + Ferric chloride Green Green NF Powder + Alcoholic Potassium hydroxide Green Green NF Physicochemical studies Table 2. Leaf surface constants for the fresh matured leaf of U. heudelotii Leaf surface parameter Results Stomatal number /mm² 6.4 ± 1.67 Powder + Iodine solution Green NF NF Powder + Ammonia solution (25%) Brown Green NF Stomatal index/% 22.1 ± 2.36 Vein islet number / mm² 6.0 ± 2.20 Vein termination number/ mm² 7.8 ± 2.58 Palisade ratio/ mm² 5.6 ± 0.89 values are presented as the mean ± SD [n=5] The parameters evaluated in physicochemical evaluations of the stem bark and leaf included the solvent extractive values, ash values, pH and elemental content. Results obtained are presented in Table 3. Table 3. Physicochemical evaluation of the leaf and stem bark of U. heudelotii Parameter Leaves Stem Bark Extractive values (% w/w) Water extract 25.00 ± 0.338 28.00 ± 0.129 Ethanol extract 28.31± 0.318 37.31± 0.125 Ethyl acetate extract 35.04 ± 0.464 10.24 ± 0.113 Petroleum ether extract 32.80 ± 0.194 6.40 ± 0.191 Total ash 6.41 ± 0.208 5.01 ± 0.258 Acid insoluble ash 1.10 ± 0.115 3.10 ± 0.238 Water soluble ash 1.08 ± 0.044 0.28 ± 0.018 Water extract 3.79 ± 0.175 3.43 ± 0.070 Ethanol extract 5.23 ± 0.133 4.46 ± 0.095 0.480 ± 0.013 0.600 ± 0.030 Ash values (% w/w) pH determinations Elemental analysis (%) Calcium (Ca) U. heudelotii Stem bark Powder + Water Reddish brown Brown Brown Powder + Ethanol (95%) Brown Pink NF Powder + Ethyl acetate Light green Pink Brown Powder + Chloroform Cream Light Cream Powder + Petroleum ether Light green Pink Powder + Concentrated ammonia Reddish brown NF NF Powder + Concentrated sulphuric acid Brown NF NF Powder + Concentrated hydrochloric acid Brown NF NF Powder + Ferric chloride Brown NF NF Powder + Alcoholic potassium hydroxide Brown Green NF Powder + Iodine solution Brown Green NF Powder + Ammonia solution (25%) Brown Purple NF NF- no fluorescence Phytochemical screening Qualitative phytochemical screening showed the occurrence of alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, phytosterols, tannins, coumarins, reducing sugars and triterpenoids in both the leaves and stem bark (Table 5). The total phenolics and Table 5. Phytochemical constituents of the leaf and stem bark of U. heudelotii Potassium (K) 0.924 ± 0.075 1.602 ± 0.162 Phytochemical Test Magnesium (Mg) 0.264 ± 0.020 0.336 ± 0.043 Reducing sugars Phosphorous (P) 0.050 ± 0.001 0.117 ± 0.008 Alkaloids Metal content (mg/kg) Light pink Leaves Stem bark Fehling’s test + + Dragendorff’s test + + Coumarins Fluorescence test + + Iron (Fe) 266.84 ±19.170 245.22 ± 0.175 Flavonoids Alkaline reagent test + + Lead (Pb) 0.0019 ± 0.0003 0.0025 ± 0.0002 Saponins Frothing test + + Copper (Cu) 15.54 ± 2.170 13.23 ± 1.910 Phytosterols Liberman Buchard’s test + + Zinc (Zn) 23.21 ± 3.075 19.19 ± 1.448 Tannins Ferric chloride test + + Terpenoids Salkowski’s test + + values are presented as the mean ± SD [n=3] Fluorescence analysis key: (+): detected Characteristic fluorescence emissions by the stem bark and total flavonoid contents of the leaf and stem bark were deleaf powders in various solvents and reagents under visible termined using gallic acid (100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, 3.12 µg/ and UV light is presented on Table 4. mL) and quercetin (100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, 3.12 µg/mL) as Plant Science Today, ISSN 2348-1900 (online) 482 KWATIA ET AL reference substances respectively. Thus, the TPC was calculated as milligram of gallic acid equivalent and TFC as milligram quercetin equivalent/gram of dried extract based on their respective standard calibration curves (Fig. 3. AB). The Fig. 3. Calibration curves for gallic acid (A) and quercetin (B) for determination of total phenolic and total flavonoid contents [concentrations used: 3.12, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 µg/mL]. total phenolic content of the leaf and stem bark were respectively determined to be 219.2 ± 10.013 and 153.9 ± 1.602 mg/g gallic acid equivalent (GAE). The total flavonoid content of the leaf was 1036 ± 33.3 while the stem bark had 310.2 ± 7.9 mg/g quercetin equivalent (QE). UV and IR analysis The UV spectra (Fig. 4) showed two ʎmax each at 203/279 nm and 203/281nm respectively for the stem bark and leaf of U. heudelotii. Prominent absorption was observed at 203 nm. Similar UV absorption patterns were observed for the stem Fig. 4. UV spectra of the of the leaf (A) and stem bark (B) MeOH extracts; IR spectra of the leaf (C) and stem bark (D) MeOH extracts bark and leaf suggesting the presence of similar constituents with extensive conjugated ring systems. Similarly, the IR spectra of both leaf and stem bark extracts showed similar fingerprint with absorption bands mainly at 2900-3300 cm-1 (broad) for hydroxyl groups (-OH stretch) and around 1600 cm-1 for alkene groups (C=C stretch). Discussion Pharmacognostic studies comprise various qualitative and quantitative tests performed on crude herbal drugs in order to authenticate or establish their identity, purity and quality (21). In this study, the leaves and stem bark of U. heudelotii were evaluated for pharmacognostic, phytochemical and physicochemical characteristics. The study of a plant’s morphology through macroscopic and microscopic evaluations are crucial as they serve as the simplest, quickest and easiest means of identihttps://plantsciencetoday.online 483 fying the plant in its natural habitat and helps in differentiating it from other related species (22). From the results, the presence of hypostomatic leaves with anticlinal polygonal straight-walled epidermal cells are consistent generic features previously observed in the foliar morphology of Uapaca species (5). It was reported that pericytic stomata occur in U. heudelotii (12). However, in the present report anisocytic stomata having guard cells between two larger subsidiary cells and one distinctly small one were generally observed for this species as was also reported (5). Other studies also report the presence of tetracytic stomata in U. vanhouttei, trichomes in U. togoensis, U. vanhoutteii and U. sansibarica (12). Apart from the generic anticlinal straightwalled polygonal epidermal cells, the presence of large tanniferous epidermal cells and absence of trichomes are also distinguishing features observed U. heudelotii. ethanolic extracts were relatively acidic (pH = 3.7 - 5.2). The aqueous extracts being more acidic than the ethanol extracts. For easy transportation and commercial purposes, most crude plants are processed into their powdered forms. Establishing standards for powdered plant materials through microscopy and physicochemical analysis is therefore important as it aids in the detection of adulterants in powdered crude drugs (23). Fibres, epidermal cells, stone cells, calcium oxalate crystals and starch grains were observed in powdered samples. The presence of calcium oxalate crystals was also reported in U. staudtii and U. togoensis (12). the normal production of oxygen-carrying red blood cells (haemoglobin), needed for energy supply, normal immune function and to prevent anaemia. Cu is required for the maintenance of healthy bones, nerves and blood vessels and also aids in iron utilization and immune function (30). Heavy metals such as lead (Pb) on the other hand, are environmental pollutants and pose a great threat to human health (31). Ingestion of large amounts of Pb is detrimental to the immune, nervous, skeletal, renal, cardiovascular and reproductive systems resulting in severe damage to the heart, kidneys, brain and reproductive organs (30). Exposures to lead both prenatally and at early childhood is linked to lower intelligence, learning deficits and impaired motor function in children (30). The highest permissible limit of lead (Pb) in medicinal herbs is 10 mg/kg according to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (3). The content of lead detected in the leaf and stem bark of U. heudelotii were 0.0019 and 0.0025 mg/kg respectively which falls in range of permissible limit. Nevertheless, the elemental content of any plant drug may vary according to its geographical location, mineral composition of the soil, climatic conditions as well as human activities (30). It must however be noted that risk of danger associated with the consumption of heavy metals depends on the average daily dietary intake. Qualitative phytochemical screening gives an indication of the major classes of phytoconstituents in a plant sample which also contribute to its biological effect. The current results were consistent with previous reports on the stem bark and leaf of U. heudelotii (8, 10). The presence of polyphenols in the plant may contribute significantly to the plant’s therapeutic effect in traditional medicine such as its use in the treatment of skin, respiratory, urinary and gastrointestinal infections. In a previous study, flavonoids from the stem bark of U. heudelottii were shown to possess significant antibacterial activity (10). Polyphenols such as flavonoids, tannins and coumarins have been shown to complex bacterial cell membrane proteins, interfere with bacteAmong the surface constants studied for the leaf, the rial adhesion and cause enzyme deactivation leading to the stomatal index remains relatively constant regardless of death of bacteria (26, 27). the age and habitat of a specific plant species and is very Foods or herbs containing minerals such calcium useful for distinguishing species of the same genus. A sto- (Ca), phosphorous (P), magnesium (Mg), potassium (K), zinc matal index (SI) range of 22.4-34% was previously reported (Zn), copper (Cu) and iron (Fe) are essential for the proper for Uapaca species (12). In this study, the SI recorded was functioning of the human body and aids in the prevention 22.1 %, which falls in range with this previous report. and treatment of several diseases (28, 29). Fe is required for The estimation of extractive values determines the extractive power of specific solvents i.e. the amount of chemical constituents extractable by a particular solvent under specified conditions (17). From the results obtained, ethyl acetate and petroleum ether had the highest extractive power for the leaves while ethanol and water afforded high extractive yields for the stem bark. This implies that the constituents of the leaves may be less/mid-polar in nature while the stem bark has more polar constituents. The ash content of a crude drug is the amount of insoluble inorganic matter naturally occurring with the plant or added to it deliberately to adulterate it for financial gains (24). The acid-insoluble ash particularly specifies adulteration with siliceous materials while the watersoluble ash gives information on the possibility of previous extraction with water (25). The leaves and stem bark had a total ash of about 5% and 6% respectively, implying that for 2 g of dried powdered leaf or stem bark of U. heudelotii the residual matter including non-volatile impurities must be approximately less than 10%. The acid-insoluble ash obtained was between 1-3% which is quite favourable as it indicates low amounts of inorganic matter naturally adhering to the crude drug. The values would be useful in determining the quality of crude samples of U. heudelotii. Conclusion The present pharmacognostic studies on the leaves and stem bark of U. heudelottii has provided standard macro and micro-morphological features and physicochemical properties that can aid in authentication of both whole and powdered samples of the plant. Major classes of secondary metabolites including phenolic compounds, saponins, alkaloids, triterpenes and sterols were identified. Future asThe average pH values obtained from aqueous and pects of this research may consider investigation of the Plant Science Today, ISSN 2348-1900 (online) 484 KWATIA ET AL pharmacognostic and physicochemical features of other 8. closely related species in order to make a clear distinction among common species in the region. Further phytochemical analysis shall consider identification of specific constituents in the plant. Ngbolua K, Tshibangu D, Mpiana P, Mihigo S, Mavakala B, Ashande M et al. Anti-sickling and antibacterial activities of some extracts from Gardenia ternifolia subsp. jovis-tonantis (Welw.) Verdc.(Rubiaceae) and Uapaca heudelotii Baill.(Phyllanthaceae). J Adv Med Pharm Sci. 2015;2(1):10-19. https://doi.org/10.9734/ JAMPS/2015/13427 9. Achika JI, Ayo RG, Oyewale AO, Habila JD. Antibacterial activity of fractions of Uapaca heudelotii Bail. Synergistic effect with ciprofloxacin. Albanian J Pharm Sci. [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Aug 14]; 11:1-7. Acknowledgements The authors appreciate the technicians in the Department of Pharmacognosy of the Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharma- 10. Achika JI, Ayo RG, Oyewale AO, Habila JD. Flavonoids with antibacterial and antioxidant potentials from the stem bark of ceutical Sciences, KNUST, Kumasi. This research was not Uapaca heudelotii. Heliyon. [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021, Aug 14]; supported by external funds. 6(2):e03381. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1920198 11. Kambale JK, Ngolua KN, Mpiana PT, Mudogo V, Tshibangu DST, Wumba DMR et al. Evaluation in vitro de l’activité antifalcémiante et effet antioxydant des extraits d’Uapaca heudelotii Baill. KS and AYM conceptualized, designed and coordinated the (Euphorbiaceae). Int J Biol Chem Sci. 2013;7(2):523-34. https:// study. Material collection macroscopic and microscopic doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v7i2.9 Authors contributions analysis were conducted by AKO and LG. Phytochemical, 12. Kadiri A, Ayodele A, Olowokudejo J, Uchemunefa DJ. Comparaphysicochemical and fluorescence analysis were done by tive leaf epidermal morphology of five West African species of Uapaca Bail (Phyllanthaceae Pro Forma Euphorbiaceae). NiEAK and AYM. All authors contributed to writing the manuger J Bot. [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2021 Aug 14]; 7:54-60. Available script, reviewed and approved the final version of the manfrom: https://plantstomata.wordpress.com/2015/10/19/stomatauscript. in-uapaca/ Compliance with ethical standards 13. Evans WC. Trease and Evans Pharmacognosy. 15th ed. London: Elsevier limited; 2002 Conflict of interest: Authors do not have any conflict of 14. Baidoo MF, Asante-Kwatia E, Mensah AY, Sam GH, Amponsah IK. Pharmacognostic characterization and development of standinterests to declare. ardization parameters for the quality control of Entada africana Ethical issues: None References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Guill. & Perr. J Appl Res Med Aromat Plants. 2019;12:36-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmap.2018.11.003 15. Kunle OF, Egharevba HO, Ahmadu PO. Standardization of herbal medicines-A review. Int J Biodivers Conserv. 2012;4(3):101-12. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJBC11.163 Khan MS, Ahmad I. Chapter 1- Herbal medicine: current trends and future prospects. In: Mohd SAK, Iqbal A, Debprasad C. Edi- 16. Adjei S, Entsua-Mensah P, Amponsah IK, Baah MK, Kwakye NAA, Addae-Kyereme NYK. Pharmacognostic and physicochemical tors. New Look to phytomedicine [e-book]. Academic Press; 2019 studies of the leaves of Hoslundia opposita Vahl (Lamiaceae). J [cited 2021 Aug 3]: 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(5):2996-3001. Available from: 814619-4.00001-X https://www.phytojournal.com/archives/2020/vol9issue5/ Chanda S. Importance of pharmacognostic study of medicinal PartAP/9-5-407-475.pdf plants: An overview. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2014;2(5):69-73. 17. Kitcher C, Mireku-Gyimah NA, Bekoe EO, Sarkodie JA, FrimpongWorld Health Organization. WHO guidelines for assessing quality Manso S, Tattah G et al. Crude drug analysis and elemental conof herbal medicines with reference to contaminants and residues tent of the leaves and stem bark of Adansonia digitata L. [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007 [cited 2021 (Malvaceae), an indigenous Ghanaian medicinal plant. Plant Sci https://apps.who.int/iris/ Aug 10]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.14719/ Today. 2021;8(2):264-72. handle/10665/43510 pst.2021.8.2.1027 Lemmens, RHMJ. Uapaca heudelotii Baill. In: Lemmens, RHMJ, 18. Blainski A, Lopes GC, De Mello JCP. Application and analysis of Louppe, D, Oteng-Amoako, AA. Editors. Plant Resources of Tropithe folin ciocalteu method for the determination of the total cal Africa / Ressources végétales de l’Afrique tropicale [Internet]. phenolic content from Limonium brasiliense L. Molecules. Netherlands: Wageningen; 2012 [cited 2021, Aug 3]. Available 2013;18(6):6852-65. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules18066852 from: http://www.prota4u.org/search.asp 19. Chang C-C, Yang M-H, Wen H-M, Chern J-C. Estimation of total Levin GA. Systematic foliar morphology of Phyllanthoideae flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimet(Euphorbiaceae). I. Conspectus. In: Annals of the Missouri Botaniric methods. J Food Drug Anal. 2002;10(3):178-82. https:// cal Garden [e-book]. Vol. 73. St. Louis: Missouri Botanic Gardens doi.org/10.38212/2224-6614.2748 Press; 1986 [cited 2021 Aug 10]: 29-85. https:// 20. Muthukrishnan S, Sivakkumar T. Physicochemical evaluation, doi.org/10.2307/2399139 preliminary phytochemical investigation, fluorescence and TLC Breteler FJ. Uapaca (Phyllanthaceae) in the Guineo-Congolian analysis of leaves of Schleichera oleosa (Lour.) Oken. Ind J Pharm forest region: a synoptic revision. Plant Ecol Evol. 2013;146(1):75Sci. 2018;80(3):525-32. https://doi.org/10.4172/pharmaceutical94. https://doi.org/10.5091/plecevo.2013.770 sciences.1000387 Burkill H. Amphimas pterocarpoides Harms (Family: Leguminosae 21. Duţu L. Pharmacognostic methods for analysis of herbal drugs, -Papilionoideae). In: The useful plants of west tropical Africa [eacccording to European Pharmacopoeia. In: Purusotam B. Edibook]. Vol. 3. Kew: Royal Botanical Gardens; 1985. [cited 2021 tor. Promising Pharmaceuticals [e-book]. Romania: Bucharest; Aug 3] Available from: http://plants.jstor.org/stable/10.5555/ 2012 [cited 2021 Aug 10]: 38-62. al.ap.upwta.3_383 https://plantsciencetoday.online 485 22. Asante-Kwatia E, Mensah AY, Baidoo FM, Asomaning AG. Quality 27. Coppo E, Marchese A. Antibacterial activity of polyphenols. Curr control standardization of the leaves and root of Landolphia Pharm Biotechnol. 2014;15(4):380-90. https:// owariensis (Apocynaceae). J Phytopharmacol. 2019;8(4):185-91. doi.org/10.2174/138920101504140825121142 https://doi.org/10.31254/phyto.2019.8407 28. Mahood HE. Estimation of essential elements and mineral in Catharanthus roseus and its biological importance as a medicinal 23. Vignesh RM, Sumitha VR.. Macro and microscopic evaluation of Gmelina arborea Roxb.–A botanical pharmacognostic approach plant. Plant Cell Biotechnol Mol Biol. 2021;22(25):1-7. for quality control of raw drug material. Plant Sci Today. 2020;7 29. Bhat R, Kiran K, Arun A, Karim AJ. Determination of mineral com(1):55-60. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2020.7.1.648 position and heavy metal content of some nutraceutically valued 24. Mandal AK, Sujith T, Rajesh A, Divya KG, Sunilkumar KN, Shakila plant products. Food Anal Methods. 2010;3(3):181-87. https:// R. Powder microscopic, physicochemical and chromatographic doi.org/10.1007/s12161-009-9107-y approach for the quality control of anti-hypertensive drug Rattha 30. Abadin H, Ashizawa A, Stevens YW, Llados F, Diamond G, Sage G Piththathirku Kudinir Chooranam. Plant Sci Today. 2021;8(3):604 et al. Toxicological profile for lead. Atlanta (GA): Agency for Toxic -49. https://doi.orf/10.14719/pst.2021.8.3.1137 Substances and Disease Registry (US); 2007. [cited 2021 Aug 3] 25. Bhusnure OG, Suryawanshi S, Swamy SV, Gholve SB, Girm PS, Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/ Birajdar MJ Standardization and quality evaluation of herbal NBK158762/ drugs. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2019;9(3-s):1058-63. https:// 31. Dghaim R, Al Khatib S, Rasool H, Ali Khan MJ. Determination of doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v9i3-s.2941 heavy metals concentration in traditional herbs commonly con26. Daglia M. Polyphenols as antimicrobial agents. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2012;23(2):174-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.copbio.2011.08.007 sumed in the United Arab Emirates. J Environ Public Health [Internet]. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/973878 Plant Science Today, ISSN 2348-1900 (online) §§§