Standards in Genomic Sciences (2009) 1: 159-165
DOI:10.4056/sigs.2494
Complete genome sequence of Anaerococcus prevotii
type strain (PC1T)
Kurt LaButti1, Rüdiger Pukall2, Katja Steenblock2, Tijana Glavina Del Rio1, Hope Tice1, Alex
Copeland1, Jan-Fang Cheng1, Susan Lucas1, Feng Chen1, Matt Nolan1, David Bruce1,3, Lynne
Goodwin1,3, Sam Pitluck1, Natalia Ivanova1, Konstantinos Mavromatis1, Galina Ovchinnikova1, Amrita Pati1, Amy Chen4, Krishna Palaniappan4, Miriam Land1,5, Loren Hauser1,5, YunJuan Chang1,5, Cynthia D. Jeffries1,5, Patrick Chain1,6, Elizabeth Saunders1,3, Thomas
Brettin1,3, John C. Detter1,3, Cliff Han1,3, Markus Göker2, Jim Bristow1, Jonathan A. Eisen1,7,
Victor Markowitz4, Philip Hugenholtz1, Nikos C Kyrpides1, Hans-Peter Klenk2, and Alla
Lapidus1*
1
DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA
2
DSMZ - German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH, Braunschweig,
Germany
3
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Bioscience Division, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
4
Biological Data Management and Technology Center, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
5
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
6
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA
7
University of California Davis Genome Center, Davis, California, USA
*Corresponding author: Alla Lapidus
Keywords: Firmicutes, Clostridiales, ‘Peptostreptococcaceae’, Gram-positive, coccoid, human
oral microflora, skin, non-motile, non-sporulating, anaerobic
Anaerococcus prevotii (Foubert and Douglas 1948) Ezaki et al. 2001 is the type species of the
genus, and is of phylogenetic interest because of its arguable assignment to the provisionally
arranged family ‘Peptostreptococcaceae’. A. prevotii is an obligate anaerobic coccus, usually
arranged in clumps or tetrads. The strain, whose genome is described here, was originally
isolated from human plasma; other strains of the species were also isolated from clinical
specimen. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. This is the first completed genome sequence of a member of
the genus. Next to Finegoldia magna, A. prevotii is only the second species from the family
‘Peptostreptococcaceae’ for which a complete genome sequence is described. The 1,998,633
bp long genome (chromosome and one plasmid) with its 1852 protein-coding and 61 RNA
genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.
Introduction
Anaerococcus
prevotii
strain
PC1T
(=
DSM
20548
=
ATCC
9321
=
JCM
6508)
is
the
type
strain
of
the
species
and
the
type
species
of
the
genus
[1].
Six
strains
of
the
species
were
characterized
by
Fou-‐
bert
and
Douglas
in
1948,
originally
designated
as
‘Micrococcus
prevotii’,
but
subsequently
placed
in
the
genus
Peptococcus
[2].
Based
on
a
comparative
study
published
by
Ezaki
et
al.
[3],
the
type
strain
of
P.
prevotii
was
then
transferred
to
the
genus
‘Peptostreptococcus’
and
later
on
assigned
to
the
novel
genus
Anaerococcus
as
A.
prevotii
[1].
The
organism
is
a
Gram-‐positive,
anaerobic,
indole-‐
negative
coccus.
The
major
metabolic
end
product
from
metabolism
of
peptone-‐yeast-‐glucose
(PYG)
is
butyric
acid.
A.
prevotii
was
provisionally
as-‐
signed
to
the
arranged
family
‘Peptostreptococ-
caceae’
within
the
order
Clostridiales,
also
desig-‐
nated
as
Family
XI
Incertae
sedis
[4].
Here
we
pre-‐
sent
a
summary
classification
and
a
set
of
features
for
A.
prevotii
strain
PC1T
together
with
the
de-‐
The Genomic Standards Consortium
Anaerococcus prevotii type strain PC1T
scription
of
the
complete
genomic
sequencing
and
annotation.
Classification and features
Within
the
last
few
years,
several
changes
occurred
in
the
classi`ication
of
the
anaerobic
Gram-‐positive
cocci.
There
are
currently
`ive
genera
of
anaerobic
Gram-‐positive
cocci
which
may
be
isolated
from
humans
(Peptostreptococcus,
Peptoniphilus,
Parvi-
monas,
Finegoldia,
and
Anaerococcus).
Members
of
the
species
A.
prevotii
are
frequently
recovered
from
human
clinical
specimens
such
as
vaginal
dis-‐
charges
and
ovarian,
peritoneal,
sacral
or
lung
ab-‐
scesses.
In
particular,
A.
prevotii
was
also
described
as
a
common
isolate
of
the
normal
`lora
of
skin,
the
oral
cavity
and
the
gut
[3].
Historically
the
Gram-‐
positive
anaerobic
cocci
were
identi`ied
mainly
by
using
phenotypic
traits,
but
as
shown
by
Song
et
al.,
this
often
led
to
the
misidenti`ication
of
A.
vaginalis
strains,
which
were
mistakenly
assigned
to
A.
prevotii
or
A.
tetradius
[5].
Currently
Genbank
does
not
contain
any16S
rRNA
sequences
from
culti-‐
vated
strains
that
can
be
clearly
linked
to
the
spe-‐
cies
A.
prevotii
with
over
95%
gene
sequence
simi-‐
larity.
Recently,
the
temporal
diversity
of
the
human
skin
microbiome
was
analyzed
using
16S
rRNA
gene
phylotyping.
It
is
noteworthy
that
several
clones
originated
from
different
skin
sites
(gluteal
crease,
occiput,
umbilicus,
popliteal
fossa,
volar
forearm).
These
isolates
were
taken
from
two
pa-‐
tients
and
showed
close
relationships
to
A.
prevotii
[6].
No
closely
related
isolates
or
uncultivated
clones
with
more
than
84%
16S
rRNA
gene
se-‐
quence
identity
are
recorded
from
global
ocean
screenings
and
environmental
samples
(except
for
human
skin).
Figure
1
shows
the
phylogenetic
neighborhood
of
A.
prevotii
strain
PC1T
in
a
16S
rRNA
based
tree.
The
four
16S
rRNA
gene
copies
in
the
genome
of
strain
PC1T
differ
by
up
to
15
nucleotides
from
each
other,
and
by
up
to
9
nucleotides
from
the
previously
pub-‐
lished
16S
rRNA
sequence
generated
from
strain
CCUG
41932
(AF542232).
The
difference
between
the
genome
data
and
the
reported
16S
rRNA
gene
sequence
is
most
likely
due
to
sequencing
errors
in
the
previously
reported
sequence
data.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of A. prevotii PC1T relative to all type strains of
the genus Anaerococcus and the type strains of all other genera within the family ‘Peptostreptococcaceae’ inferred from 1,302 aligned characters [7,8] of the 16S rRNA sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [9]. Rooting was done with the type species of the genus Clostridium. The
branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above
branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates if larger than 60%. Lineages with type
strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [10] are shown in blue, published genomes
in bold.
A.
prevotii
PC1T
cells
are
Gram-‐positive
and
non-‐
motile(Table
1).
Cells
grown
in
PYG
broth
are
0.6-‐0.9
µm
in
diameter
and
occur
in
pairs,
tetrads
or
ir-‐
regular
clumps
or
short
chains
(Figure
2).
Colonies
range
from
0.5
to
2
mm
in
diameter
on
Columbia
blood
agar.
Optimum
temperature
for
growth
is
37°C.
Strain
PC1T
metabolizes
peptones
and
amino
acids
and
the
major
metabolic
end
product
from
PYG
medium
is
butyric
acid.
Most
species
of
the
ge-‐
nus
Anaerococcus
ferment
carbohydrates
weakly.
A.
160
prevotii
is
proteolytic.
α-‐Glucosidase,
α
–galactosi-‐
dase,
ß-‐glucuronidase
and
pyroglutamyl
arylami-‐
dase
activities
are
detectable
[19,20].
Production
of
urease
may
vary
among
strains
of
the
species.
Most
strains
produce
ammonia
from
threonine
and
ser-‐
ine
[3]
by
deamination
of
the
amino
acids
to
pyru-‐
vate.
A.
prevotii
is
resistant
to
sodium
polyanethol
sulfonate
[21],
but
susceptible
to
the
penicillins
[19].
Standards in Genomic Sciences
Labuti, et al.
Chemotaxonomy
Cell
wall
amino
acid
analysis
of
strain
PC1T
yielded
peptidoglycan
type
A4αʹ′,
composed
of
L-‐Lys-‐D-‐Glu
[22],
type
A12.2
according
to
the
DSMZ
catalogue
of
strains.
Cell
wall
sugars
are
glucose,
glucosamine
and
galactose
[22].
Major
cellular
fatty
acid
compo-‐
sition
of
the
type
strain
was
analyzed
by
Lambert
and
Arm`ield
in
1979
[23]
and
by
Ezaki
et
al.
in
1983
[3],
but
the
results
of
these
studies
are
con-‐
tradictory.
No
other
chemotaxonomic
data
are
available
at
present.
Genome sequencing and annotation
Genome project history
This
organism
was
selected
for
sequencing
on
the
basis
of
its
phylogenetic
position,
and
is
part
of
the
Genomic
Encyclopedia
of
Bacteria
and
Archaea
pro-‐
ject.
The
genome
project
is
deposited
in
the
Ge-‐
nomes
OnLine
Database
[10]
and
the
complete
ge-‐
nome
sequence
has
been
deposited
in
GenBank.
Sequence,
`inishing
and
annotation
were
performed
by
the
DOE
Joint
Genome
Institute
(JGI).
A
sum-‐
mary
of
the
project
information
is
shown
in
Table
2
Table 1. Classification and general features of A. prevotii PC1T in accordance with the MIGS recommendations [11]
Evidence
MIGS ID
Property
Term
code
Domain Bacteria
TAS [12]
Phylum Firmicutes
TAS [13]
Class Clostridia
TAS [4]
Order Clostridiales
TAS [14]
Current classification
Family ‘Peptostreptococcaceae’
TAS [4]
Genus Anaerococcus
TAS [1]
Species Anaerococcus prevotii
TAS [1]
MIGS-22
MIGS-6
MIGS-15
MIGS-14
MIGS-4
MIGS-5
MIGS-4.1
MIGS-4.2
MIGS-4.3
MIGS-4.4
Gram stain
Cell shape
Motility
Sporulation
Temperature range
Optimum temperature
Type strain PC1
positive
coccoid
nonmotile
nonsporulating
mesophile
37°C
TAS [1,3]
TAS [15]
TAS [15]
TAS [15]
TAS [15]
TAS [15]
TAS [15]
Salinity
Oxygen requirement
growth in PYG +6% NaCl
anaerobic
TAS [16]
TAS [15]
Carbon source
unknown
Energy source
Habitat
Biotic relationship
Pathogenicity
Biosafety level
Isolation
Geographic location
Sample collection time
peptones
human mouth, skin and vaginal microflora
free living
opportunistic infections
2
human plasma
not reported
not reported
Latitude – Longitude
Depth
Altitude
not reported
not reported
not reported
TAS [1,3]
TAS [3,10]
NAS
TAS [10]
TAS [17]
TAS [3]
Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a
direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living,
isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence
codes are available from the Gene Ontology project [18]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly
observed for a live isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.
.
http://standardsingenomics.org
161
Anaerococcus prevotii type strain PC1T
Table 2. Genome sequencing project information
MIGS ID
Property
Term
MIGS-31
Finishing quality
MIGS-28
Libraries used
Finished
Three genomic libraries: two Sanger libraries - 8 kb
pMCL200 and fosmid pcc1Fos – and one 454 pyrosequence standard library
MIGS-29
Sequencing platforms
ABI3730, 454 GS FLX, Illumina GA
MIGS-31.2
Sequencing coverage
6.8 Sanger; 42.3 pyrosequence
MIGS-30
Assemblers
Newbler version 1.1.02.15, Arachne
MIGS-32
Gene calling method
Genbank IDs
Prodigal, GenePRIMP
CP001708 (chromosome)
CP001709 (plasmid pAPRE01)
4/28/2009 (chromosome)
4/28/2009 (plasmid pAPRE01)
Genbank Dates of Release
MIGS-13
GOLD ID
Gc01089
NCBI project ID
29533
Database: IMG-GEBA
2501533213
Source identifier
DSM 20548
Project relevance
Tree of Life, GEBA
Figure 2. Scanning electron micrograph of A.
prevotii PC1T (M. Rohde, HZI Braunschweig)
Growth condi tions and DNA isolation
A.
prevotii
strain
PC1T,
DSM
20548,
was
grown
an-‐
aerobically
in
DSMZ
medium
104
[24]
at
37°C.
DNA
was
isolated
from
1-‐1.5
g
of
cell
paste
using
Qiagen
Genomic
500
DNA
Kit
(Qiagen,
Hilden,
Germany)
following
the
instructions
given
by
the
manufac-‐
turer,
but
with
a
modi`ied
protocol
for
cell
lysis,
LALMP,
according
to
Wu
et
al.
[25].
Genome sequencing and assembly
The
genome
was
sequenced
using
a
combination
of
Sanger,
454
and
Illumina
sequencing
platforms.
All
162
general
aspects
of
library
construction
and
se-‐
quencing
can
be
found
at
the
JGI
web
site.
Reads
produced
by
454
Pyrosequencing
were
assembled
using
the
Newbler
assembler
version
1.1.02.15
(Roche).
Large
Newbler
contigs
were
broken
into
2,196
overlapping
fragments
of
1,000
bp
and
en-‐
tered
into
the
assembly
as
pseudo-‐reads.
The
se-‐
quences
were
assigned
quality
scores
based
on
Newbler
consensus
q-‐scores
with
modi`ications
to
account
for
overlap
redundancy
and
to
adjust
in-‐
`lated
q-‐scores.
A
hybrid
454/Sanger
assembly
was
made
using
the
Arachne
assembler.
Possible
mis-‐
assemblies
were
corrected
and
gaps
between
con-‐
tigs
were
closed
by
custom
primer
walks
from
sub-‐
clones
or
PCR
products.
A
total
of
66
Sanger
`inish-‐
ing
reads
were
produced.
Illumina
reads
were
used
to
improve
the
`inal
consensus
quality
using
an
in-‐
house
developed
tool
(the
Polisher).
The
`inal
as-‐
sembly
consisted
of
18,576
Sanger
and
464,157
Roche/454
reads.
The
error
rate
of
the
completed
genome
sequence
is
less
than
1
in
100,000.
To-‐
gether
all
sequence
types
provided
49.1
coverage
of
the
genome.
Genome annotation
Genes
were
identi`ied
using
Prodigal
[26]
as
part
of
the
Oak
Ridge
National
Laboratory
genome
annota-‐
tion
pipeline,
followed
by
a
round
of
manual
cura-‐
tion
using
the
JGI
GenePRIMP
pipeline
[27].
The
predicted
CDSs
were
translated
and
used
to
search
the
National
Center
for
Biotechnology
Information
(NCBI)
nonredundant
database,
UniProt,
TIGRFam,
Standards in Genomic Sciences
Labuti, et al.
Pfam,
PRIAM,
KEGG,
COG,
and
InterPro
databases.
Additional
gene
prediction
analysis
and
functional
annotation
was
performed
within
the
Integrated
Microbial
Genomes
(IMG-‐ER)
platform
[28].
Genome properties
The
genome
is
1,998,633
bp
long
(chromosome
and
one
circular
plasmid)
with
a
35.6%
GC
content
(Ta-‐
ble
3).
Of
the
1,913
genes
predicted,
1,852
were
protein
coding
genes,
and
61
were
RNAs.
A
total
of
46
pseudogenes
were
also
identi`ied,
with
73.1%
of
the
genes
being
assigned
a
putative
function.
The
remaining
genes
were
annotated
as
hypothetical
proteins.
The
distribution
of
genes
into
COGs
func-‐
tional
categories
is
presented
in
Figure
3
and
Table
4.
Table 3. Genome Statistics
Attribute
Value
% of Total
Genome size (bp)
1,998,633
100.00%
DNA Coding region (bp)
1,815,671
90.85%
712,291
35.64%
DNA G+C content (bp)
Number of replicons
2
Extrachromosomal elements
1
Total genes
1913
100.00%
RNA genes
61
3.19%
rRNA operons
Protein-coding genes
4
1852
96.81%
46
2.405%
1399
73.13%
Genes in paralog clusters
231
12.08%
Genes assigned to COGs
1421
74.28%
Genes assigned Pfam domains
1428
74.65%
Genes with signal peptides
337
17.62%
Genes with transmembrane helices
467
24.41%
Pseudo genes
Genes with function prediction
CRISPR repeats
0
Figure 3. Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward
strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes
(tRNAs green, sRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
http://standardsingenomics.org
163
Anaerococcus prevotii type strain PC1T
Table 4. Number of genes associated with the 21 general COG functional categories
Code
J
A
K
L
B
D
Y
V
T
M
N
Z
W
U
O
C
G
E
F
H
I
P
Q
R
S
-
Value
133
%
7.2
0
118
105
1
20
0
55
43
69
5
0
0
19
61
84
144
107
61
56
37
102
9
84
118
431
0.0
6.4
5.7
0.1
1.1
0.0
3.0
2.3
3.7
0.3
0.0
0.0
1.0
3.3
4.5
7.8
5.8
3.3
3.0
2.0
5.5
0.5
4.5
6.4
23.3
Description
Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
RNA processing and modification
Transcription
Replication, recombination and repair
Chromatin structure and dynamics
Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Nuclear structure
Defense mechanisms
Signal transduction mechanisms
Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
Cell motility
Cytoskeleton
Extracellular structures
Intracellular trafficking and secretion
Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
Energy production and conversion
Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
Amino acid transport and metabolism
Nucleotide transport and metabolism
Coenzyme transport and metabolism
Lipid transport and metabolism
Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
General function prediction only
Function unknown
Not in COGs
Acknowledgements
We
would
like
to
gratefully
acknowledge
the
help
of
Su-‐
sanne
Schneider
(DSMZ)
for
DNA
extraction
and
quality
analysis.
This
work
was
performed
under
the
auspices
of
the
US
Department
of
Energy
Of`ice
of
Science,
Biological
and
Environmental
Research
Program,
and
by
the
Uni-‐
versity
of
California,
Lawrence
Berkeley
National
Labo
ratory
under
contract
No.
DE-‐AC02-‐05CH11231,
Law-‐
rence
Livermore
National
Laboratory
under
Contract
No.
DE-‐AC52-‐07NA27344,
and
Los
Alamos
National
Labora-‐
tory
under
contract
No.
DE-‐AC02-‐06NA25396,
as
well
as
German
Research
Foundation
(DFG)
INST
599/1-‐1.
References
1.
Ezaki T, Kawamura Y, Li N, Li ZY, Zhao L, Shu S.
Proposal of the genera Anaerococcus gen. nov.,
Peptoniphilus gen. nov. and Gallicola gen. nov. for
members of the genus Peptostreptococcus. Int J
Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1521-1528. PubMed
2.
Foubert EL, Douglas HC. Studies on the Anaerobic
Micrococci: I. Taxonomic Considerations. J Bacteriol 1948; 56:25-34.
3.
Ezaki T, Yamamoto N, Ninomiya K, Suzuki S,
Yabuuchi E. Transfer of Peptococcus indolicus, Peptococcus asaccharolyticus, Peptococcus prevotii,
and Peptococcus magnus to the genus Peptostrep-
164
tococcus and proposal of Peptostreptococcus tetradius sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1983;
33:683-698.
4.
Garrity GM, Holt J. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR,
Castenholz RW (2001). Taxonomic Outline of the
Archaea and Bacteria. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd Ed. Volume 1 The Archaea,
Deeply Branching and Phototrophic Bacteria.
Springer-Verlag, New York pp 155-166
5.
Song Y, Liu C, McTeague M, Vu A, Liu JY, Finegold
SM. Rapid identification of Gram-positive anaerobic coccal species originally classified in the genus
Standards in Genomic Sciences
Peptostreptococcus by multiplex PCR assays using
genus- and species-specific primers. Microbiology
2003; 149:1719-1727. PubMed
doi:10.1099/mic.0.26227-0
6.
Grice EA, Kong HH, Conlan S, Deming CB, Davis
J, Young AC, Bouffard GG, Blakesley RW, Murray
PR, Green ED, et al. Topographical and temporal
diversity of the human skin microbiome. Science
2009; 324:1190-1192. PubMed
7.
Lee C, Grasso C, Sharlow MF. Multiple sequence
alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics 2002; 18:452-464. PubMed
doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.3.452
8.
Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from
multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic
analysis. Mol Biol Evol 2000; 17:540-552. PubMed
9.
Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A rapid
bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web-servers.
Syst Biol 2008; 57:758-771. PubMed
doi:10.1080/10635150802429642
10. Liolios K, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Kyrpides
NC. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in
2007: status of genomic and metagenomic projects
and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res
2008; 36:D475-D479. PubMed
doi:10.1093/nar/gkm884
11. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J,
Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli
SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541-547. PubMed
doi:10.1038/nbt1360
12. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a
natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 1990; 87: 4576-4579. PubMed
doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576
13. Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved list of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol
1980; 30: 225-230.
14. Prevot AR.. Dictionnaire des Bactéries Pathogènes.
In: Hauduroy P, Ehringer G, Guillot G, Magrou J,
Prevot AR, Rosset A, Urbain A, editors. 2nd ed.
Paris 1953.
15. Douglas HC. Genus VI Peptococcus. Bergey’s
Manual of Determinative Bacteriology1957. p 474480.
16. Holdeman LV, Johnson J, Moore WEC. Genus Peptostreptococcus. In: Sneath P, editor. Bergey’s
http://standardsingenomics.org
Labuti, et al.
Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Volume 2. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1986. p 1083-1092.
17. Biological Agents. Technical rules for biological
agents www.baua.de TRBA 466.
18. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler
H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS,
Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.
Nat Genet 2000; 25:25-29. PubMed
doi:10.1038/75556
19. Murdoch DA. Gram-positive anaerobic cocci.
[PubMed]. Clin Microbiol Rev 1998; 11:81-120.
PubMed
20. Ezaki T, Li N, Kaamura Y. The Anaerobic Grampositive cocci. The Prokaryotes. 3rd ed. Volume 4.
New York: Springer 2006. p 795-808.
21. Song Y, Liu C, Finegold SM. Development of a flow
chart for identification of gram-positive anaerobic
cocci in the clinical laboratory. J Clin Microbiol
2007; 45: 512-516. PubMed
doi:10.1128/JCM.01872-06
22. Schleifer KH, Nimmermann E. Peptidoglycan types
of strains of the genus Peptococcus. Arch Mikrobiol
1973; 93: 245-258. PubMed
doi:10.1007/BF00412024
23. Lambert MA, Armfield AY. Differentiation of Peptococcus and Peptostreptococcus by gas-liquid
chromatography of cellular fatty acids and metabolic products. J Clin Microbiol 1979; 10:464-476.
PubMed
24. List of media used at DSMZ for cell growth:
http://www.dsmz.de/microorganisms/media_list.php
25. Wu M, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R,
Dalin E, Ivanova N, Kunin V, Goodwin L, Tindall BJ,
et al. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopedia of
Bacteria and Archaea. Nature (In press).
26. Anonymous. Prodigal Prokaryotic Dynamic Programming Genefinding Algorithm. Oak Ridge National Laboratory and University of Tennessee
2009. http://compbio.ornl.gov/prodigal.
27. Pati A, Ivanova N, Mikhailova N, Ovchinikova G,
Hooper SD, Lykidis A, Kyrpides NC. GenePRIMP: A
Gene Prediction Improvement Pipeline for microbial genomes. (Submitted) 2009.
28. Markowitz V, Mavromatis K, Ivanova N, Chen IM,
Chu K, Palaniappan K, Szeto E, Anderson I, Lykidis
A, Kyrpides N. Expert Review of Functional Annotations for Microbial Genomes. Bioinformatics
2009; 25: 2271-2278. PubMed
doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp393
165