Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 06 August 2021
Sec. Plant Pathogen Interactions
This article is part of the Research Topic Molecular Interactions between Crops and Phytopathogens, Volume II: Rice View all 8 articles

The Flower-Infecting Fungus Ustilaginoidea virens Subverts Plant Immunity by Secreting a Chitin-Binding Protein

\r\nGuo-Bang Li&#x;Guo-Bang LiJing Fan*&#x;Jing Fan*†Jin-Long WuJin-Long WuJia-Xue HeJia-Xue HeJie LiuJie LiuShuai ShenShuai ShenZeeshan Ghulam Nabi GishkoriZeeshan Ghulam Nabi GishkoriXiao-Hong HuXiao-Hong HuYong ZhuYong ZhuShi-Xin ZhouShi-Xin ZhouYun-Peng JiYun-Peng JiMei PuMei PuJing-Hao ZhaoJing-Hao ZhaoZhi-Xue ZhaoZhi-Xue ZhaoHe WangHe WangJi-Wei ZhangJi-Wei ZhangYan-Yan HuangYan-Yan HuangYan LiYan LiFu HuangFu HuangWen-Ming Wang*Wen-Ming Wang*
  • State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Exploration and Utilization in Southwest China, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China

Ustilaginoidea virens is a biotrophic fungal pathogen specifically colonizing rice floral organ and causes false smut disease of rice. This disease has emerged as a serious problem that hinders the application of high-yield rice cultivars, by reducing grain yield and quality as well as introducing mycotoxins. However, the pathogenic mechanisms of U. virens are still enigmatic. Here we demonstrate that U. virens employs a secreted protein UvCBP1 to manipulate plant immunity. In planta expression of UvCBP1 led to compromised chitin-induced defense responses in Arabidopsis and rice, including burst of reactive oxygen species (ROS), callose deposition, and expression of defense-related genes. In vitro-purified UvCBP1 protein competes with rice chitin receptor OsCEBiP to bind to free chitin, thus impairing chitin-triggered rice immunity. Moreover, UvCBP1 could significantly promote infection of U. virens in rice flowers. Our results uncover a mechanism of a floral fungus suppressing plant immunity and pinpoint a universal role of chitin-battlefield during plant–fungi interactions.

Introduction

As a staple food, rice feeds over half of the population of the world. Rice diseases have caused significant yield losses every year, thus being urgent problems to ensure food security (Liu et al., 2014). Rice false smut, caused by the fungus Ustilaginoidea virens (teleomorph: Villosiclava virens), emerges as one of the most devastating diseases for rice production (Sun et al., 2020). U. virens specifically infects rice flowers and develops into large mycelial colonies covered with massive chlamydospores, called false smut balls (Tang et al., 2013; Fan et al., 2016). Formation of false smut balls not only leads to considerable yield losses but also generates a diversity of mycotoxins poisonous to humans and animals (Zhou et al., 2012; Dhua et al., 2015). U. virens-produced mycotoxins mainly include ustiloxins and ustilaginoidins, which show cytotoxicities and phytotoxicities by inhibiting the mitosis process in eukaryotic cells (Zhou et al., 2012). Despite the notorious effects, little is known on the pathogenesis and resistance mechanisms of rice false smut. Resistance genes against U. virens have not been cloned in rice or its relatives, except that a candidate gene (LOC_Os01g42630) was suggested (Wang et al., 2019; Qiu et al., 2020). Development of disease intervention strategies will benefit from understanding the pathogenic mechanisms of U. virens.

Ustilaginoidea virens infects rice flowers specifically at the late booting stage of rice (Sun et al., 2020). At around 1 week before heading, U. virens spores initiate infection by germinating on the surface of developing spikelets, and then the hyphae grow epiphytically without penetrating the spikelet tissues and cells (Fan et al., 2014, 2015). Extending hyphae reach to the inner space of a spikelet through the gap between the lemma and the palea (Ashizawa et al., 2012), and preferentially attack stamen filaments intercellularly (Tang et al., 2013). This infection stage seems to be vital for successful colonization of U. virens, as stamen-defect rice mutant could not support disease progression of false smut (Fan et al., 2020). After colonization in stamen filaments, U. virens hyphae extend to other floral tissues, including anthers, lodicules, stigmas, and ovary, and only infect lodicules and stigmas to a lesser extent (Tang et al., 2013; Song et al., 2016). Finally, U. virens mycelia grow large to a false smut ball, probably via hijacking rice grain-filling system to obtain abundant nutrients (Fan et al., 2015; Song et al., 2016).

The specific infection strategy of U. virens, as revealed by above cellular studies, drives researchers to explore the underlying molecular mechanisms between U. virens and rice. Decoding of U. virens genome reveals that U. virens possesses no pectin lyases and reduced gene inventory for glycoside hydrolases, which are involved in breaking down of plant cell wall components (Zhang et al., 2014). This finding is in accordance with the intercellular infection mode in stamen filaments, which are arranged loosely (Rong et al., 2017), suggesting adaptations of U. virens to flower infection and biotrophic lifestyle. As a biotroph, U. virens must be able to escape or subvert the surveillance of host immune system. Pathogen effectors play a vanguard role in manipulating plant immunity for promoting colonization (Toruño et al., 2016; Wang and Wang, 2018). The effector pool in U. virens contains 256 putative effector proteins with signal peptides (SPs) and 165 unconventional effectors with rich Cys residues (Zhang et al., 2021). A small set of effectors have been demonstrated to suppress cell death in Nicotiana benthamiana triggered by Burkholderia glumae (Zhang et al., 2014). Among them, SCRE1 and SCRE2 also suppress Bax- and INF1-induced cell death and attenuate pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity in rice (Fang et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2020). In addition, the core effector SCRE2/UV_1261 contributes to U. virens pathogenicity in rice panicles (Fan et al., 2019; Fang et al., 2019). However, it remains elusive how U. virens effectors counteract plant immunity.

To understand the pathogenesis mechanisms of rice false smut, we initially performed a genome-wide transcriptional analysis on rice flowers infected with U. virens, and found that U. virens infection suppressed the expression of defense-related genes, such as NPR1 and CNGC, in rice flowers (Fan et al., 2015). In this study, we demonstrated that U. virens highly expressed a secreted protein during infection, which could bind with free chitin to sequester chitin-triggered plant immunity and promote U. virens colonization. Our findings provide new insights into the pathogenic mechanisms of a floral organ-specific pathogen.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials and Fungal Strains

In this study, rice cultivar Q455 was used for genetic transformation and grown in an experimental field under natural conditions. Col-gl (Arabidopsis thaliana accession Col-0 containing the glabrous mutation) was used for genetic transformation and grown in a growth chamber under conditions of short day (8 h of light and 16 h of darkness), 22°C, 75% relative humidity (RH). N. benthamiana plants were grown at 22°C, 75% RH under 10 h light and 14 h darkness. U. virens isolate PJ52-2-5 (PJ52 for short) was used for artificial inoculation experiments. PJ52 was cultured at 28°C in potato sucrose agar (PSA: 200 g/L potato, 20 g/L sucrose, 13 g/L agar) or potato sucrose (PS: 200 g/L potato, 20 g/L sucrose) media. Rhizoctonia solani isolate AG1-IA was cultured at 28°C in potato dextrose agar (PDA: 200 g/L potato, 20 g/L dextrose, 13 g/L agar) medium.

Constructs and Transformation

For validation of UvCBP1 SP, predicted UvCBP1SP sequence was synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Chengdu, China) and cloned into the pSUC2T7M13ORI (pSUC2) vector (Jacobs et al., 1997) to generate pSUC2-UvCBP1SP.

For purification of recombinant proteins, sequences encoding mature UvCBP1 and OsCEBiP proteins were amplified with indicated primers (Supplementary Table 1) and ligated into the BamHI-EcoRI linearized pMAL-c5x or pGEX-6p-1 vectors.

For transient expression in N. benthamiana and stable expression in A. thaliana, the full-length of UvCBP1 was amplified from PJ52 with the primer pair UvfCBP1_SacIF/UvfCBP1_KpnIR (Supplementary Table 1). The resultant was ligated into the binary vector pCAMBIA1300-eYFP to generate UvCBP1-eYFP construct, which was introduced to Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101. Transformation in N. benthamiana or Arabidopsis was performed as described (Clough and Bent, 1998; Huang et al., 2014).

For stable expression in rice, full-length of UvCBP1 was amplified with the primer pair UvfCBP1_SacIF/UvfCBP1_SpelIR (Supplementary Table 1) and ligated to pCAMBIA1300 to generate 35S-UvCBP1 construct. EHA105 containing 35S-UvCBP1 was introduced into rice cultivar Q455. Positive transgenic plants were screened by hygromycin resistance analysis (Li et al., 2014).

Fungal Inoculation

Ustilaginoidea virens inoculation was conducted as previously described (Fan et al., 2015). Briefly, rice panicles at late booting stage (approximately 1 week before heading) were inoculated with blended mixture of U. virens mycelia and conidia, whose concentration was adjusted to 1 × 106 conidia/mL. Inoculated rice panicles were sampled at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15 dpi (days post inoculation) for reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). At around 24 dpi, diseased panicles were photographed and the number of false smut balls of each panicle was recorded. R. solani inoculation was followed by the method described by Zheng et al. (2013).

Verification of Signal Peptide

To verify the functionality of UvCBP1 SP, plasmids of pSUC2-UvCBP1SP, pSUC2-Avr1bSP, and pSUC2-Mg87N were transformed into yeast strain YTK12 and subjected to yeast secretion assay as performed previously (Fan et al., 2019). To further confirm whether UvCBP1 could be secreted, subcellular localization of UvCBP1-eYFP was determined in N. benthamiana. After transient expression of UvCBP1-eYFP or eYFP control in N. benthamiana for 2 days, leaf discs were treated with 10% (m/v) sucrose solution for 10 min to achieve plasmolysis and then viewed under a laser scanning confocal microscope (Nikon A1). Protein size was confirmed by a western blot assay with an anti-GFP antibody (BBI Life Science).

RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR

Arabidopsis leaves were infiltrated with 10 μg/mL of chitin, and samples were collected at 12 h post infiltration for subsequent experiments. Rice leaves or spikelets were incubated with 30 μg/mL of chitin alone or chitin preincubated with 30 μg recombinant protein (Glutathione S-Transferase (GST) or GST-UvCBP1), and sampled at different time points. Total RNA was extracted using the TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen) and the first-strand cDNA was synthesized using the ReverTra Ace kit (TOYOBO). SYBR Green mix (Takara) was used with corresponding primers (Supplementary Table 1) for expression analysis. AtACT2, OsUbi, and UvTub2α were used as internal controls for quantifying gene expression in Arabidopsis, rice, and U. virens, respectively.

Measurement of Reactive Oxygen Species

In Arabidopsis, chitin-induced burst of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was measured as described by Li et al. (2018). In rice, chitin was incubated with the recombinant protein (GST-UvCBP1 or GST) for 1 h, and then mixed with 20 μM luminol and 10 μg/mL horseradish peroxidase. The resultants were applied to rice leaf discs to induce ROS, which was recorded in a GloMax 20/20 luminometer (Shi et al., 2018).

Callose Deposition

In Arabidopsis, chitin-induced callose deposition was performed as described by Li G.-B. et al. (2020). In rice, the first healthy leaves of 5-day-old seedling were collected and placed in ddH2O for 6 h. Chitin solution (final concentration 50 μg/mL) was added and subjected to vacuum treatment for 40 min, prior to 20 h incubation at room temperature. Subsequently, aniline blue staining for callose deposits was conducted according to a previous work (Liu et al., 2012).

Chitin Binding Assay

The recombinant proteins (GST-UvCBP1 and GST) were purified from Escherichia coli and used for chitin-binding assay as described earlier with modifications (Han et al., 2019). Briefly, the recombinant proteins were incubated with chitin beads (NEB), crab shell chitin (Sigma), cellulose (Sigma), and chitosan (Sigma) in 800 μL ddH2O at 4°C. After 4 h, the insoluble pellet fraction was centrifuged (4°C, 12000 rpm, 10 min), and the supernatant was collected. The insoluble pellets were rinsed three times with ddH2O. Both the supernatants and the pellets were boiled in 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) for extraction of proteins, which were then separated in 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) gels and immunoblotted with an anti-GST antibody (Invitrogen).

Phylogenetic Analysis

Genes encoding proteins MoChia1 from Magnaporthe oryzae, MrChi from Moniliophthora roreri, MpChi from Moniliophthora perniciosa, and other paralogs of UvCBP1 from U. virens were retrieved from the UniProt database website1. The amino acid (aa) sequences were aligned by the MEGA5.1 software (Tamura et al., 2011). The resultant file was subjected to iTOL (Letunic and Bork, 2016)2 for construction of phylogenetic tree with default parameters.

Results

UvCBP1 Encodes a Secreted Protein and Is Highly Expressed During Ustilaginoidea virens Infection

A previous de novo transcriptome analysis identified a number of U. virens genes highly expressed during infection with rice flowers (Fan et al., 2015). Here, we selected one of the top 10-highly induced gene UvCBP1 for further investigation. We first determined a time-course expression pattern of UvCBP1 by RT-qPCR analysis. Compared to the expression level of UvCBP1 in axenic culture, the abundance of UvCBP1 transcripts started to increase at 5 dpi, peaked at 7 dpi with more than 20-fold increase when U. virens hyphae invaded the inner floral organs of rice spikelets (Figure 1) (Fan et al., 2015).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Expression analysis of UvCBP1 during Ustilaginoidea virens infection in rice. Spikelets from PJ52-inoculated rice panicles were sampled at indicated time points and subjected to RT-qPCR analysis. The mixture of mycelia and conidia from PSB-cultured PJ52 was collected as the control sample. Relative expression level of UvCBP1 was determined using UvTub2α as the reference gene. Data are represented as means ± SD of three biological replicates. Asterisk indicates significant difference determined by Student’s t test (∗∗P < 0.01). Similar results were obtained from two independent experiments. dpi, day post inoculation.

Sequence analysis revealed that UvCBP1 encoded a putative protein with 450 aa containing a predicted SP (Supplementary Figure 1). The functionality of UvCBP1-SP was verified by a yeast secretion assay as described previously (Jacobs et al., 1997; Fang et al., 2016; Fan et al., 2019). The sequence encoding predicted SP of UvCBP1 was fused in frame with mature invertase (SUC2) and introduced into the yeast strain YTK12. The wild-type YTK12 cannot utilize raffinose due to its deficiency in invertase secretion, whereas the YTK12 strain transformed with the UvCBP1SP-SUC2 could grow well on YPRAA medium supplemented with raffinose as the sole carbon source. YTK12 strains transformed with Avr1bSP-SUC2 or Mg87 N–terminus-SUC2 were used as positive and negative control, respectively (Figure 2A). As a result, UvCBP1SP is a functional SP.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. UvCBP1 encodes a secreted protein. (A) Validation of UvCBP1 signal peptide (SP). The DNA fragment encoding SP of UvCBP1 was cloned into pSUC2, in frame with an invertase gene. The resultant plasmid was transformed into YTK12 that is unable to utilize raffinose. SP of UvCBP1 could enable YTK12 to grow on YPRAA medium, indicating its functionality. SP of Avr1b and N-terminus of Mg87 were applied as positive and negative controls, respectively. (B) UvCBP1-eYFP is located in the apoplast of leaf cells in Nicotiana benthamiana. UvCBP1-eYFP or eYFP was transiently expressed in N. benthamiana and examined by confocal microscopy. After plasmolysis with 10% sucrose, fluorescence signal of UvCBP1-eYFP was clearly detected in the extracellular space, while eYFP was in the cytoplasm and nucleus. The blue arrows indicate plasma membrane and the red arrows indicate plant cell wall. Scale bar, 20 μm.

To further verify UvCBP1 as a secreted protein, we tagged the full-length of UvCBP1 with a yellow fluorescent protein (UvCBP1-eYFP) and expressed it in N. benthamiana. After confirmation of expression of indicated proteins by western blot (Supplementary Figure 2A), we examined the subcellular localization of expressed proteins. Assisted by plasmolysis treatment with 10% sucrose, we observed that UvCBP1-eYFP was located in the apoplast space between N. benthamiana cells. As a control, eYFP was located in the cytoplasm and the nucleus of plant cells (Figure 2B). Taken together, UvCBP1 encodes a secreted protein that is likely involved in U. virens infection.

In planta Expression of UvCBP1 Suppresses Chitin-Triggered Plant Immunity

Highly induced expression of UvCBP1 in planta suggests its role in communicating with plant host for the benefits of U. virens. To explore the functions of UvCBP1 in planta, we first generated A. thaliana transgenic plants expressing the full-length of UvCBP1-eYFP. Positive transgenic plants were confirmed by western blot with an anti-GFP antibody (Supplementary Figure 2B). We then analyzed the effects of UvCBP1-eYFP on chitin-triggered immunity in Arabidopsis. In the wild-type Col-gl, chitin induced rapid production of ROS, high expression of defense-related genes AtPR1 and AtPR2, and massive accumulation of callose deposits in leaves (Figure 3). By contrast, expression of UvCBP1-eYFP significantly inhibited chitin-induced ROS burst, PR gene expression, and callose deposition, compared with those in Col-gl controls (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. UvCBP1 suppresses chitin-triggered immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana. (A) Chitin-induced burst of ROS. Data were represented as the mean ± SD of four biological replicates. (B) Expression analysis of defense-related genes in chitin-treated leaves of UvCBP1-expressing plants and Col-gl control. Relative expression levels of indicated genes were determined using AtACT2 as the reference gene. Data were represented as the mean ± SD of three replicates. (C,D) Chitin-induced callose deposition. Leaves of indicated Arabidopsis plants were infiltrated with chitin. At 10 h post infiltration, leaves were collected for aniline blue staining. Representative microscopy images were shown (C) and the number of callose deposits was recorded (D). Bar data were mean ± SD of four biological replicates. Scale bar, 50 μm. Asterisk in this figure indicates significant difference determined by Student’s t test (∗∗P < 0.01).

These results drove us to further test whether UvCBP1 could suppress chitin-triggered immunity in rice. We introduced the full-length of UvCBP1 into the rice cultivar Q455, which is highly compatible with U. virens. We selected two independent transgenic lines with high expression of UvCBP1 for subsequent analyses (Figure 4A and Supplementary Figure 3). In both leaf and floral organs, chitin induced the expression of defense-related genes, such as OsBETV1, OsNAC4, and OsPR10b. However, the induction of these genes was markedly suppressed in UvCBP1-expressing plants (Figure 4B and Supplementary Figure 3). Expression of UvCBP1 in rice also inhibited chitin-triggered callose deposition (Figures 4C,D). These data support an important role of UvCBP1 in subverting plant immunity.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. In planta expression of UvCBP1 compromises rice immunity triggered by chitin. (A) Expression analysis of UvCBP1 in transgenic rice plants. The relative expression was determined by RT-qPCR using OsUbi as the reference gene. No expression of UvCBP1 was detected in the wild-type Q455. (B) Expression analysis of defense-related genes in chitin-treated leaves of UvCBP1-expressing plants and Q455. Relative expression levels of indicated genes were determined using OsUbi as the reference gene. Data are represented as means ± SD of three biological replicates. (C,D) Chitin-induced callose deposition. Leaves of indicated rice plants were treated with chitin for 20 h and subjected to aniline blue staining. Representative microscopy images were shown (C) and the number of callose deposits was recorded (D). Bar data were mean ± SD of four biological replicates. Scale bar, 50 μm. Asterisk in this figure indicates significant difference determined by Student’s t test (∗∗P < 0.01).

UvCBP1 Binds to Chitin and Attenuates Chitin Perception to Suppress Plant Immunity

Homologous sequence search identified that UvCBP1 protein is homologous to several recently identified effectors, such as M. oryzae MoChia1, M. perniciosa MpChi, and M. roreri MrChi (Fiorin et al., 2018; Han et al., 2019). These effectors possess chitin-binding ability and thus could sequester chitin-triggered plant immunity. Nine aa residues were predicted to be chitin-binding residues in MpChi (Fiorin et al., 2018), and six of the nine residues were conserved in UvCBP1 (Supplementary Figure 1). It is indicated that UvCBP1 may be able to bind with chitin. To confirm this, we conducted a chitin-binding assay with GST-tagged UvCBP1 recombinant protein. After incubated with insoluble chitin beads, crab shell chitin, chitosan, or cellulose, GST-UvCBP1 could be coprecipitated with chitin beads and crab shell chitin, but not with chitosan and cellulose (Figure 5A). By contrast, the control GST protein was only detected in the supernatant and could not be coprecipitated with any of the tested cell wall polysaccharides (Figure 5A). As a result, UvCBP1 has chitin-binding activity. We assumed that UvCBP1 may compete with the rice chitin receptor OsCEBiP for chitin binding. To test this hypothesis, we incubated chitin beads with the recombinant protein MBP-OsCEBiP and increasing amounts of MBP-UvCBP1. After pull-down of the chitin beads, we detected decreasing amounts of OsCEBiP, correlated with increasing amounts of UvCBP1 (Figure 5B). This finding indicates that UvCBP1 could interfere with chitin perception by plant receptors.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. UvCBP1 competes with rice chitin receptor OsCEBiP to bind with free chitin. (A) Chitin-binding assay. The recombinant protein GST-UvCBP1 was incubated with insoluble chitin beads, shrimp shell, cellulose, and chitosan. GST protein was used as control. After incubation and elution, the pellets (P) and supernatant (S) were detected by Western blot with an anti-GST antibody. (B) UvCBP1 competes with OsCEBiP for chitin binding. Increasing amounts of MBP-UvCBP1 was mixed with MBP-OsCEBiP, and the resultants were incubated with chitin beads. MBP-UvCBP1 or MBP-OsCEBiP pull-down by chitin beads was detected with an anti-MBP antibody.

Next, we tested whether in vitro-expressed GST-UvCBP1 could sequester chitin-induced defense responses in rice. Prior to treating rice, chitin was either incubated with GST-UvCBP1 or GST for 1 h. The results showed that rice leaves treated with GST-incubated chitin rapidly produced a great amount of ROS, whereas ROS burst occurred later and the amount was markedly reduced when chitin was incubated with GST-UvCBP1 (Figure 6A). Also, chitin-induced expression of defense genes, including OsBETV1, OsNAC4, and OsPR10b, was significantly suppressed by GST-UvCBP1 treatment (Figures 6B,C). These data indicate that UvCBP1 may impair chitin-OsCEBiP perception to attenuate chitin-induced immune responses in rice.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. UvCBP1 traps chitin from activating defense responses in rice. (A) Chitin-induced ROS burst in rice leaves. Chitin was co-incubated with GST-UvCBP1 or GST for 1 h, and then the resultants were used for inducing ROS. The data indicate the mean ± SD of three biological replicates. The experiment was repeated twice with similar results. (B,C) Chitin-induced expression of defense-related genes in rice leaves (B) or spikelets (C). Chitin was incubated with GST-UvCBP1 or GST for 1 h, and then the resultants were used to treat rice leaves (for 12 h) or spikelets (for 6 h). Relative expression of indicated genes was determined using OsUbi as the reference gene. Data are represented as mean ± SD of three replicates. Different letters above data bars indicate significant difference as determined by one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) analysis (P < 0.01).

UvCBP1 Enhances Pathogen Infection in Rice

To define the contribution of UvCBP1 to pathogen colonization, we investigated whether UvCBP1-expressing rice lines are more sensitive to U. virens. At late booting stage of rice, the U. virens strain PJ52 were inoculated into rice panicles. After 24 days of inoculation, both UvCBP1-expressing rice and wild-type Q455 displayed false smut balls in panicles (Figure 7A), while UvCBP1-expressing rice panicles accommodated a larger number of false smut balls than Q455 panicles (Figure 7B), indicating that UvCBP1 could promote U. virens infection in rice. As chitin-triggered immunity is a conserved antifungal pathway, we considered that in planta expression of UvCBP1 may be able to compromise plant resistance to other fungal pathogens. In consistent with this notion, UvCBP1-expressing rice was more susceptible to a necrotrophic fungal pathogen, R. solani, which causes rice sheath blight disease (Figures 7C,D).

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. UvCBP1 enhances pathogen infection in rice. (A,B) Rice false smut disease assay. U. virens PJ52 was inoculated into rice panicles at late booting stage. Disease phenotype was recorded at 24 days post inoculation (dpi) (A), and the number of false smut balls per panicle was box plotted (B). Scale bar, 4 cm. (C,D) Rice sheath blight disease assay. Rice leaves were inoculated with mycelial plugs of Rhizoctonia solani strain AG1-IA. Disease phenotype was recorded at 2 dpi (C), and the relative lesion area was calculated (D). Scale bar, 2 cm. Asterisk in this figure indicates significant difference determined by Student’s t test (**P < 0.01).

UvCBP1 Has Multiple Paralogs in Ustilaginoidea virens

Since U. virens infection process in rice flowers last for several weeks (Fan et al., 2020) and the expression of UvCBP1 peaked at 7 dpi (Figure 1), it is possible that U. virens may deploy multiple effectors to synergically manipulate chitin-triggered rice immunity during the entire infection process. Indeed, we identified seven paralogs of UvCBP1 in U. virens genome. Three of them were closely clustered with UvCBP1 (Figure 8A), indicating that they may share similar biochemical functions. We next examined the expression patterns of UvCBP1 paralogs during U. virens infection in rice flowers. Compared with the gene expression in PS culture, Uv8b_6959 was slightly upregulated at 7 dpi, while other six paralogs tended to be induced at late stages of infection. Particularly, Uv8b_7687 was induced by over 400-fold at 15 dpi (Figure 8B). Therefore, UvCBP1 paralogs may contribute differently to U. virens colonization, and UvCBP1 is likely the critical one contributing to the initial colonization in rice stamen filaments (Figure 1).

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. Phylogenetic and expression analyses of UvCBP1 paralogs in U. virens. (A) Phylogenetic analysis of UvCBP1 paralogs in U. virens and other fungal pathogens. The size of yellow circles represent bootstrap values ranging from 0 to 1. The numbers represent branch lengths. (B) Expression analysis of paralogous genes of UvCBP1 during U. virens infection in rice. The mixture of mycelia and conidia from PS-cultured PJ52 was collected as the control sample. Relative expression levels of indicated genes were determined using UvTub2α as the reference gene. Data are represented as means ± SD of three biological replicates. dpi, days post inoculation.

Discussion

UvCBP1 is a secreted protein that is highly expressed particularly in the initial colonization stage in rice stamen filaments (Figure 1) (Fan et al., 2020). Although future work to knockout or knockdown UvCBP1 in U. virens may reveal whether it is required for pathogenicity, we demonstrate that its in planta expression in rice spikelets enhances U. virens colonization (Figures 7A,B), supporting its role as a potential virulence factor. Furthermore, both in planta and in vitro data suggest that UvCBP1 could suppress plant pattern-triggered immunity, including ROS burst, callose deposition, and defense gene expression (Figures 3, 4, 6). Due to the chitin-binding ability, UvCBP1 acts as an effector protein to manipulate plant immunity.

Chitin-triggered immunity is a conserved antifungal immune system in plants, which may be subverted by sophisticated fungal pathogens via multiple strategies as summarized in a recent review (Gong et al., 2020). For instance, fungal pathogens protect their cell wall from releasing plant immunity-inducible chitin fragments by secreting proteases to degrade plant chitinases (Okmen et al., 2018), masking cell wall with α-1,3-glucan and effector proteins (van den Burg et al., 2006; Fujikawa et al., 2012), or deacetylating chitin to chitosan (Gao et al., 2019). Fungal pathogens can also secrete effectors with high affinity to chitin fragments, such as Ecp6 (de Jonge et al., 2010), Slp1 (Mentlak et al., 2012), MoAa91 (Li Y. et al., 2020), MpChi (Fiorin et al., 2018), MoChia1 (Han et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2019), and Mg3LysM (Marshall et al., 2011), to outcompete host chitin receptors and block chitin perception. Some powdery mildew fungi may deploy effectors with chitinase activity to degrade immunogenic chitin oligomers, and thus preventing perception by plant chitin receptors (Martínez-Cruz et al., 2021). Additionally, some fungi utilize effectors like NIS1 and AvrPiz-t to target plant intracellular immune components involved in chitin signaling, such as BIK1 and OsRac1 (Bai et al., 2019; Irieda et al., 2019). Although a set of effectors with diverse counteracting strategies have been identified, these findings are mostly restricted to foliar pathosystems. In this work, we show that the flower-infecting fungus U. virens sequesters chitin-triggered immunity by secreting UvCBP1 to bind with free chitin. Our findings support the idea that escaping or subverting chitin-induced plant immunity is a prerequisite for colonization of fungal pathogens in different plant organs.

The infection process of U. virens is generally consisted of two phases, including epiphytic growth stage on the surface of rice lemma and palea and intercellular infection stage in rice stamen and pistil organs (Song et al., 2016; Fan et al., 2020). Under our experimental conditions, the epiphytic stage usually lasts for approximately 5 days. Afterward, U. virens starts to colonize stamen filaments as primary infection sites. At 7 dpi, considerable infection hyphae can be detected at stamen filaments, indicating this time point may be critical for successful colonization of U. virens (Fan et al., 2020). In the present work, we detected an induced expression of UvCBP1 as early as 5 dpi and the highest expression at 7 dpi (Figure 1). Due to the coincidence of UvCBP1 expression and U. virens infection stage in stamen filaments, it is conceivable that UvCBP1 is a critical effector to manipulate rice immunity during initial intercellular infection of U. virens. By contrast, UvCBP1 paralogs shared distinctive expression patterns from UvCBP1 (Figure 8B). For example, Uv8b_6607 and Uv8b_7687 were mostly induced at a very late infection stage (15 dpi), when U. virens mycelia have developed into an early false smut ball (Wang et al., 2019). These data indicate different roles of UvCBP1 paralogs during U. virens infection of rice flowers, although they may possess similar biochemical functions as suggested by phylogenetic analysis (Figure 8A). In future work, it would be interesting to investigate how UvCBP1 and its paralogs coordinately support successful colonization and false smut ball formation of U. virens.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author Contributions

JF and W-MW conceived and the project. YL and FH contributed to the planning of research. G-BL, JF, J-LW, J-XH, JL, SS, ZG, X-HH, YZ, and HW performed the experiments and analyzed the data. S-XZ, Y-PJ, MP, J-HZ, Z-XZ, J-WZ, and Y-YH analyzed the data. JF, G-BL, and W-MW wrote the manuscript with input from other authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31772241 and 32072503 to JF) and the Sichuan Applied Fundamental Research Foundation (2020YJ0145 to JF and 2020YJ0332 to W-MW).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We thank Wenxian Sun (China Agricultural University) for the courtesy of yeast strain YTK12 and pSUC2-derived plasmids, Yuese Ning (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences) for technical support on ROS assay, and Ai-Ping Zheng (Sichuan Agricultural University) for providing R. solani strain AG1-IA.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.733245/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1 | Multiple sequence alignment. Amino acid sequences of UvCBP1, together with MoChia1 (G4MXR2), MpChi (A0A385MIS5), and MrChi (A0A0W0FPC8) retrieved from UniProt database, were aligned by MEGA5.1 with default parameters. Red asterisks indicate chitin-binding residues as reported in MpChi (Fiorin et al., 2018). Red rectangle indicates the signal peptide of UvCBP1. The regions with homology over 50% were boxed, and identical residues were shaded in black.

Supplementary Figure 2 | Western blot with anti-GFP antibody for confirmation of protein expression in N. benthamiana (A) and Arabidopsis (B).

Supplementary Figure 3 | In planta expression of UvCBP1 suppresses chitin-induced expression of defense-related genes in rice spikelets. Expression of UvCBP1 (A) and defense-related genes (B) were examined by RT-qPCR using OsUbi as the reference gene. Data are represented as means ± SD of three biological replicates. Asterisk indicates significant difference determined by Student’s t test (∗∗P < 0.01).

Supplementary Table 1 | Primers used in this study.

Footnotes

  1. ^ https://www.uniprot.org
  2. ^ https://itol.embl.de/index.shtml

References

Ashizawa, T., Takahashi, M., Arai, M., and Arie, T. (2012). Rice false smut pathogen, Ustilaginoidea virens, invades through small gap at the apex of a rice spikelet before heading. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 78, 255–259. doi: 10.1007/s10327-012-0389-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bai, P., Park, C. H., Shirsekar, G., Songkumarn, P., Bellizzi, M., and Wang, G. L. (2019). Role of lysine residues of the Magnaporthe oryzae effector AvrPiz-t in effector- and PAMP-triggered immunity. Mol. Plant Pathol. 20, 599–608. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12779

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Clough, S. J., and Bent, A. F. (1998). Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 16, 735–743. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Jonge, R., Peter van Esse, H., Kombrink, A., Shinya, T., Desaki, Y., Bours, R., et al. (2010). Conserved fungal LysM effector Ecp6 prevents chitin-triggered immunity in plants. Science 329, 953–955. doi: 10.1126/science.1190859

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dhua, U., Dhua, S. R., and Sahu, R. K. (2015). Precise disease severity assessment for false smut disease of rice. J. Phytopathol. 163, 931–940. doi: 10.1111/jph.12395

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fan, J., Du, N., Li, L., Li, G., Wang, Y., Zhou, Y., et al. (2019). A core effector UV_1261 promotes Ustilaginoidea virens infection via spatiotemporally suppressing plant defense. Phytopathol. Res. 1:11.

Google Scholar

Fan, J., Guo, X. Y., Huang, F., Li, Y., Liu, Y. F., Li, L., et al. (2014). Epiphytic colonization of Ustilaginoidea virens on biotic and abiotic surfaces implies the widespread presence of primary inoculum for rice false smut disease. Plant Pathol. 63, 937–945. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12167

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fan, J., Guo, X. Y., Li, L., Huang, F., Sun, W. X., Li, Y., et al. (2015). Infection of Ustilaginoidea virens intercepts rice seed formation but activates grain-filling-related genes. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 57, 577–590. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12299

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fan, J., Liu, J., Gong, Z.-Y., Xu, P.-Z., Hu, X.-H., Wu, J.-L., et al. (2020). The false smut pathogen Ustilaginoidea virens requires rice stamens for false smut ball formation. Environ. Microbiol. 22, 646–659. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14881

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fan, J., Yang, J., Wang, Y. Q., Li, G. B., Li, Y., Huang, F., et al. (2016). Current understanding on Villosiclava virens, a unique flower-infecting fungus causing rice false smut disease. Mol. Plant Pathol. 17, 1321–1330. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12362

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fang, A., Han, Y., Zhang, N., Zhang, M., Liu, L., Li, S., et al. (2016). Identification and characterization of plant cell death-inducing secreted proteins from Ustilaginoidea virens. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 29, 405–416. doi: 10.1094/mpmi-09-15-0200-r

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fang, A. F., Gao, H., Zhang, N., Zheng, X. H., Qiu, S. S., Li, Y. J., et al. (2019). A novel effector gene SCRE2 contributes to full virulence of Ustilaginoidea virens to rice. Front. Microbiol. 10:845. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00845

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fiorin, G. L., Sanchez-Vallet, A., Thomazella, D. P. D., do Prado, P. F. V., do Nascimento, L. C., Figueira, A. V. D., et al. (2018). Suppression of plant immunity by fungal chitinase-like effectors. Curr. Biol. 28, 3023–3030. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.07.055

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fujikawa, T., Sakaguchi, A., Nishizawa, Y., Kouzai, Y., Minami, E., Yano, S., et al. (2012). Surface alpha-1,3-glucan facilitates fungal stealth infection by interfering with innate immunity in plants. PLoS Pathol. 8:e1002882. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002882

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, F., Zhang, B. S., Zhao, J. H., Huang, J. F., Jia, P. S., Wang, S., et al. (2019). Deacetylation of chitin oligomers increases virulence in soil-borne fungal acetylation of chitin oligomers increases virulence in soil-borne fungal pathogens. Nat. Plants 5, 1167–1176. doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0527-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gong, B.-Q., Wang, F.-Z., and Li, J.-F. (2020). Hide-and-Seek: chitin-triggered plant Immunity and fungal counterstrategies. Trends Plant Sci. 25, 805–816. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2020.03.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, Y. J., Song, L. L., Peng, C. L., Liu, X., Liu, L. H., Zhang, Y. H., et al. (2019). A Magnaporthe chitinase interacts with a rice jacalin-related lectin to promote host colonization. Plant Physiol. 179, 1416–1430. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.01594

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, Y. Y., Shi, Y., Lei, Y., Li, Y., Fan, J., Xu, Y. J., et al. (2014). Functional identification of multiple nucleocytoplasmic trafficking signals in the broad-spectrum resistance protein RPW8.2. Planta 239, 455–468. doi: 10.1007/s00425-013-1994-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Irieda, H., Inoue, Y., Mori, M., Yamada, K., Oshikawa, Y., Saitoh, H., et al. (2019). Conserved fungal effector suppresses PAMP-triggered immunity by targeting plant immune kinases. PNAS 116, 496–505. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1807297116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jacobs, K. A., Collinsracie, L. A., Colbert, M., Duckett, M., Goldenfleet, M., Kelleher, K., et al. (1997). A genetic selection for isolating cdnas encoding secreted proteins. Gene 198, 289–296. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00330-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Letunic, I., and Bork, P. (2016). Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W242–W245.

Google Scholar

Li, G.-B., Wang, T.-T., Du, N., Zhou, S.-X., Pu, M., Zhao, J.-Q., et al. (2020). IMMUTANS positively regulates RPW8.1-mediated disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 111:101493. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2020.101493

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Liu, X., Liu, M., Wang, Y., Zou, Y., You, Y., et al. (2020). Magnaporthe oryzae auxiliary activity protein MoAa91 functions as chitin-binding protein to induce appressorium formation on artificial inductive surfaces and suppress plant immunity. Mbio 11, e03304–e03319.

Google Scholar

Li, Y., Lu, Y. G., Shi, Y., Wu, L., Xu, Y. J., Huang, F., et al. (2014). Multiple rice microRNAs are involved in immunity against the blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Plant Physiol. 164, 1077–1092. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.230052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, Q. X., Wang, T. T., Cao, X. L., Zhao, Z. X., et al. (2018). RESISTANCE TO POWDERY MILDEW8.1 boosts pattern-triggered immunity against multiple pathogens in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 16, 428–441. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12782

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, B., Li, J. F., Ao, Y., Qu, J., Li, Z., Su, J., et al. (2012). Lysin motif-containing proteins LYP4 and LYP6 play dual roles in peptidoglycan and chitin perception in rice innate immunity. Plant Cell 24, 3406–3419. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.102475

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, W. D., Liu, J. L., Triplett, L., Leach, J. E., and Wang, G. L. (2014). Novel insights into rice innate immunity against bacterial and fungal pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 52, 213–241. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-102313-045926

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marshall, R., Kombrink, A., Motteram, J., Loza-Reyes, E., Lucas, J., Hammond-Kosack, K. E., et al. (2011). Analysis of two in planta expressed LysM effector homologs from the fungus Mycosphaerella graminicola reveals novel functional properties and varying contributions to virulence on wheat. Plant Physiol. 156, 756–769. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.176347

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martínez-Cruz, J., Romero, D., Hierrezuelo, J., Thon, M., de Vicente, A., and Pérez-García, A. (2021). Effectors With Chitinase Activity (EWCAs), a family of conserved, secreted fungal chitinases that suppress chitin-triggered immunity. Plant Cell 33, 1319–1340. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koab011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mentlak, T. A., Kombrink, A., Shinya, T., Ryder, L. S., Otomo, I., Saitoh, H., et al. (2012). Effector-mediated suppression of chitin-triggered immunity by Magnaporthe oryzae is necessary for rice blast disease. Plant Cell 24, 322–335. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.092957

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Okmen, B., Kemmerich, B., Hilbig, D., Wemhoner, R., Aschenbroich, J., Perrar, A., et al. (2018). Dual function of a secreted fungalysin metalloprotease in Ustilago maydis. New Phytol. 220, 249–261. doi: 10.1111/nph.15265

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qiu, J. H., Lu, F. F., Wang, H., Xie, J. H., Wang, C. C., Liu, Z. Q., et al. (2020). A candidate gene for the determination of rice resistant to rice false smut. Mol. Breed. 40:105.

Google Scholar

Rong, N., Yong, M., Ying, X. U., and Hu, D. W. (2017). Relationship between ultrastructure of cell walls of rice spikelets and infection specificity of Villosiclava virens. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occidentalia Sin. 37, 1–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2012.02629.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, X. T., Long, Y., He, F., Zhang, C. Y., Wang, R. Y., Zhang, T., et al. (2018). The fungal pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae suppresses innate immunity by modulating a host potassium channel. PLoS Pathol. 14:e1006878. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006878

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Song, J. H., Wei, W., Lv, B., Lin, Y., Yin, W. X., Peng, Y. L., et al. (2016). Rice false smut fungus hijacks the rice nutrients supply by blocking and mimicking the fertilization of rice ovary. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 3840–3849. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13343

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, W., Fan, J., Fang, A., Li, Y., Tariqjaveed, M., Li, D., et al. (2020). Ustilaginoidea virens: insights into an emerging rice pathogen. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 58, 363–385. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-010820-012908

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M., and Kumar, S. (2011). MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tang, Y. X., Jin, J., Hu, D. W., Yong, M. L., Xu, Y., and He, L. P. (2013). Elucidation of the infection process of Ustilaginoidea virens (teleomorph: Villosiclava virens) in rice spikelets. Plant Pathol. 62, 1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2012.02629.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Toruño, T. Y., Stergiopoulos, I., and Coaker, G. (2016). Plant-pathogen effectors: cellular probes interfering with plant defenses in spatial and temporal manners. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 54, 419–441. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080615-100204

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van den Burg, H. A., Harrison, S. J., Joosten, M. H., Vervoort, J., and de Wit, P. J. (2006). Cladosporium fulvum Avr4 protects fungal cell walls against hydrolysis by plant chitinases accumulating during infection. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 19, 1420–1430. doi: 10.1094/mpmi-19-1420

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, W. M., Fan, J., and Jeyakumar, J. M. J. (2019). “Rice false smut: an increasing threat to grain yield and quality,” in Protecting Rice Grains In The Post-Genomic Era–, ed. Y. Jia (London, United Kingdom: IntechOpen), 89–108.

Google Scholar

Wang, Y., and Wang, Y. (2018). Phytophthora sojae, effectors orchestrate warfare with host immunity. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 46, 7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2018.01.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, C., Yu, Y. Q., Huang, J. K., Meng, F. W., Pang, J. H., Zhao, Q. Q., et al. (2019). Binding of the Magnaporthe oryzae chitinase MoChia1 by a rice tetratricopeptide repeat protein allows free chitin to trigger immune responses. Plant Cell 31, 172–188. doi: 10.1105/tpc.18.00382

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, K., Zhao, Z., Zhang, Z., Li, Y., Li, S., Yao, N., et al. (2021). Insights into genomic evolution from the chromosomal and mitochondrial genomes of Ustilaginoidea virens. Phytopathol. Res. 3:9.

Google Scholar

Zhang, N., Yang, J., Fang, A. F., Wang, J., Li, D., Li, Y., et al. (2020). The essential effector SCRE1 in Ustilaginoidea virens suppresses rice immunity via a small peptide region. Mol. Plant Pathol. 21, 445–459. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12894

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Zhang, K., Fang, A., Han, Y., Yang, J., Xue, M., et al. (2014). Specific adaptation of Ustilaginoidea virens in occupying host florets revealed by comparative and functional genomics. Nat. Commun. 5:3849.

Google Scholar

Zheng, A. P., Lin, R. M., Zhang, D. H., Qin, P. G., Xu, L. Z., Ai, P., et al. (2013). The evolution and pathogenic mechanisms of the rice sheath blight pathogen. Nat. Commun. 4:1424.

Google Scholar

Zhou, L., Lu, S., Shan, T., Wang, P., Sun, W., Chen, Z., et al. (2012). “Chemistry and biology of mycotoxins from rice false smut pathogen,” in Mycotoxins: Properties, Applications and Hazards, eds B. J. Melborn and J. C. Greene (New York, NY, USA: Nova Science Publishers), 109–130.

Google Scholar

Keywords: chitin-triggered immunity, chitin receptor, flower-infecting, rice false smut, Ustilaginoidea virens

Citation: Li G-B, Fan J, Wu J-L, He J-X, Liu J, Shen S, Gishkori ZGN, Hu X-H, Zhu Y, Zhou S-X, Ji Y-P, Pu M, Zhao J-H, Zhao Z-X, Wang H, Zhang J-W, Huang Y-Y, Li Y, Huang F and Wang W-M (2021) The Flower-Infecting Fungus Ustilaginoidea virens Subverts Plant Immunity by Secreting a Chitin-Binding Protein. Front. Plant Sci. 12:733245. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.733245

Received: 30 June 2021; Accepted: 16 July 2021;
Published: 06 August 2021.

Edited by:

Guotian Li, Huazhong Agricultural University, China

Reviewed by:

Fuhao Cui, China Agricultural University, China
Yanjun Kou, China National Rice Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China

Copyright © 2021 Li, Fan, Wu, He, Liu, Shen, Gishkori, Hu, Zhu, Zhou, Ji, Pu, Zhao, Zhao, Wang, Zhang, Huang, Li, Huang and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jing Fan, fanjing13971@sicau.edu.cn; Wen-Ming Wang, j316wenmingwang@sicau.edu.cn

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.