Figure 5 - uploaded by Chatchai Ngernsaengsaruay
Content may be subject to copyright.
Similar publications
The present study was conducted to assess the cytotoxicity, thrombolytic, anthelmintic and antioxidant activity of mehanolic extract of Litsea monopetala (Family: Lauraceae) leaves in laboratory using in vitro methods. Cytotoxicity test was done by brine shrimp lethality bioassay where the extract concentration was 400, 200, 100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25...
Lauraceaei srepresente dbyc.16generai nIndi aofwhichLitseaLam.I sth elargest .Taxonomic
revisionofth egenusi nIndi ahasbeeninitiate dbyth eauthorst oprovidedetailedaccountofinfragenerictaxa .Thepresentpaperprovidesdistributional,datai ntable salongwithnoteson.rareand
endemicspeciesofLitseaLam.i nIndi abasedonfieldsurvey,materialavailablei nth ehe...
Detecting how historical and contemporary factors contribute to genetic divergence and genetic structure is a central question in ecology and evolution. We examine this question by intergrating population genetics with ecological niche modelling of Litsea auriculata (Lauraceae), which is endangered and native to east China. Geographical and environ...
The Litsea deccanensis leaves (LDL) extract acted as a corrosion inhibitor for mild steel (MS) in 1N HCl medium. The various techniques handled were weight loss measurement, electrochemical studies, FTIR and surface analysis etc. The inhibition efficiency was increased as increasing the concentration of Litsea deccanensis extract. The electrochemic...
Essential oils are largely consumed as they are beneficial to humans as natural remedies and also for biomedical, cosmetic, food, veterinary, and agriculture applications. Litsea which includes around 200 species, is an important genus of the Lauraceae family due to its production of secondary compounds. It comprises several species and can serve a...
Citations
... 7.11 of the Shenzhen Code (Turland et al., 2018;hereafter 'Code'). Later authors (Ngernsaengsaruay et al., 2005;de Kok, 2015;Singh, 2017), presumably unaware of these inadvertent typifications, either published new and superfluous lectotypifications, or, in three cases, effectively published second-step lectotypifications. ...
... There are two specimens at K but these were not distinguished into a lectotype and isolectotype so Kostermans (1970) can be taken as a first-step lectotypification. Later, Ngernsaengsaruay et al. (2005) overlooked the lectotypification by Kostermans (1970) and designated Maingay 1269 (K) as lectotype. The specimen K000797100 bears the annotation "Lectotype of Litsea castanea Hook.f. ...
... selected by David Middleton in 2005". Therefore, the lectotypification by Ngernsaengsaruay et al. (2005) is accepted here as a second-step lectotypification under Art. 9.10 as David Middleton is one of the coauthors of the paper. ...
This article deals with inadvertent lectotypifications of five names in the Lauraceae, Cryptocarya densiflora, Cryptocarya impressa,
Cylicodaphne infectoria, Laurus cubeba and Litsea castanea, that have been previously overlooked.
This paper deals with the lectotypification of 26 names of 14 recognised species in the genus Litsea Lam. and two replacement names are proposed for Lindera hookeri Meisn. and Tetranthera khasyana Meisn. as Litsea himalayensis R. Kr. Singh and Litsea meghalayensis R. Kr. Singh.
