19.06.2013 Views

VOLUM OMAGIAL - Facultatea de Ştiinţe ale Naturii şi Ştiinţe Agricole

VOLUM OMAGIAL - Facultatea de Ştiinţe ale Naturii şi Ştiinţe Agricole

VOLUM OMAGIAL - Facultatea de Ştiinţe ale Naturii şi Ştiinţe Agricole

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

An<strong>ale</strong>le Universităţii Ovidius<br />

Seria: BIOLOGIE – ECOLOGIE<br />

Volumul 14, anul 2010<br />

<strong>VOLUM</strong> <strong>OMAGIAL</strong><br />

Ovidius University Annals<br />

BIOLOGY – ECOLOGY Series<br />

Volume 14, year 2010<br />

OVIDIUS UNIVERSITY PRESS


An<strong>ale</strong>le Universităţii Ovidius, Seria Biologie – Ecologie<br />

Volumul 14 (2010)<br />

<strong>VOLUM</strong> <strong>OMAGIAL</strong><br />

(<strong>de</strong>dicat împlinirii a 20 <strong>de</strong> ani <strong>de</strong> la înfiinţarea Facultăţii<br />

<strong>de</strong> <strong>Ştiinţe</strong> <strong>ale</strong> <strong>Naturii</strong> <strong>şi</strong> <strong>Ştiinţe</strong> <strong>Agricole</strong>)<br />

Redactor Şef<br />

Prof. univ. dr. Marian Traian GOMOIU<br />

Membru corespon<strong>de</strong>nt al Aca<strong>de</strong>miei Române<br />

mtg@datanet.ro<br />

Redactori<br />

Conf. univ. dr. Marius FĂGĂRAŞ Prof. univ. dr. Rodica BERCU<br />

fagaras_marius@yahoo.com rodicabercu@yahoo.com<br />

Mail address: Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, “Ovidius” University of Constanţa, Aleea<br />

Universităţii nr. 1, corp B, Constanţa RO-900470, România, Tel. 0241605060/ Fax: 0241606432,<br />

contact@stiintele-naturii.ro.<br />

ORDERING INFORMATION<br />

Ovidius University Annals of Biology – Ecology is published annually by Ovidius University Press. The journal<br />

may be obtained on exchange basis with similar Romanian or foreign institutions.<br />

No part of its publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any<br />

means, electronically, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the written permission of the<br />

Publisher, Ovidius University Press, Blvd. Mamaia 124, RO-900527, Constanţa, România.<br />

© 2010 Ovidius University Press ISSN 1453–1267


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series, Volume 14 (2010)<br />

Contents<br />

Limitative mycotic factors for some plants from the Bulgarian coast of the Black Sea<br />

Gavril NEGREAN………………………………………………………………………................................<br />

The medicinal plants of Provadiisko Plateau<br />

Dimcho ZAHARIEV, Desislav DIMITROV………………………………………………………………...<br />

The plants with protection statute, en<strong>de</strong>mites and relicts of the Shumensko Plateau<br />

Dimcho ZAHARIEV, Elka RADOSLAVOVA……………………………………………………………...<br />

A characteristic of mo<strong>de</strong>l habitats in south Dobrudja<br />

Dimcho ZAHARIEV………………………………………………………………………..………………..<br />

Floristic aspects of the Hills of Camena village (Tulcea county)<br />

Marius FĂGĂRAŞ............................................................................................................................................<br />

I<strong>de</strong>ntification of some rose genitors with resistance to the pathogens agents attack<br />

Marioara TRANDAFIRESCU, Corina GAVĂT, Iulian TRANDAFIRESCU, Elena DOROFTEI ………...<br />

Preliminary data on Meledic-Mânzăleşti Natural Reserve (Buzău county, Romania)<br />

Daciana SAVA, Mariana ARCUŞ, Elena DOROFTEI………………………………………………………<br />

Contributions to the biometrical and phytobiological study on wild garlic<br />

Mariana LUPOAE, Dragomir COPREAN, Rodica DINICĂ, Paul LUPOAE……………………………….<br />

Dinitrophenyl <strong>de</strong>rivates action on wheat germination<br />

Cristina Amalia DUMITRAŞ -HUŢANU ………………………….………………………………………..<br />

The action of some insectici<strong>de</strong>s upon physiological indices in Rana (Pelophylax) ridibunda<br />

Alina PĂUNESCU, Cristina M. PONEPAL, Octavian DRĂGHICI, Alexandru G. MARINESCU..............<br />

Changes of some physiological parameters in Prussian carp un<strong>de</strong>r the action of some fungici<strong>de</strong><br />

Maria C. PONEPAL, Alina PĂUNESCU, Alexandru G. MARINESCU, Octavian DRĂGHICI...................<br />

Cytogenetic effects induced by manganese and lead microelements on germination at Triticum<br />

aestivum L.<br />

Elena DOROFTEI, Maria Mihaela ANTOFIE, Daciana SAVA, Marioara TRANDAFIRESCU...................<br />

Problems of the harmonizing environmental legislation at the compartment “Pisces” in<br />

the Republic of Moldova<br />

Petru COCIRTA, Olesea GLIGA …………………………………………………………………………....<br />

Biodiversity conservation in Constanţa county<br />

Silvia TURCU, Marcela POPOVICI, Loreley JIANU.....................................................................................<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press<br />

3<br />

17<br />

25<br />

33<br />

45<br />

55<br />

61<br />

67<br />

73<br />

79<br />

83<br />

89<br />

99<br />

107


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series, Volume 14 (2010)<br />

The present situation of the nose horned viper populations (Vipera ammodytes montandoni<br />

Boulenger 1904) from Dobrudja (Romania and Bulgaria)<br />

Marian TUDOR………………………………………………………………………………………………<br />

Body size variation in Rana temporaria populations inhabiting extreme environments<br />

Rodica PLĂIAŞU, Raluca BĂNCILĂ, Dan COGĂLNICEANU……………………………………………<br />

Utilization of epifluorescence microscopy and digital image analysis to study some morphological<br />

and functional aspects of prokariotes<br />

Simona GHIŢĂ, Iris SARCHIZIAN, Ioan ARDELEAN…………………………………………………….<br />

Changes in bacterial abundance and biomass in sandy sediment microcosm supplemented with<br />

gasoline<br />

Dan Răzvan POPOVICIU, Ioan ARDELEAN.................................................................................................<br />

The formation of bacterial biofilms on the hydrophile surface of glass in laboratory static<br />

conditions: the effect of temperature and salinity<br />

Aurelia Manuela MOLDOVEANU, Ioan I. ARDELEAN...............................................................................<br />

The clinical utility of additional methods in effusions evaluation<br />

Ana Maria CREŢU, Mariana AŞCHIE, Diana BADIU, Natalia ROŞOIU…………………………………..<br />

Spatio-temporal dynamics of phytoplankton composition and abundance from the Romanian Black<br />

Sea coast<br />

Laura BOICENCO……………………………………………………………………………………………<br />

Aspects regarding the biodiversity of the aquatic and semi-aquatic heteroptera in the lakes situated<br />

in the middle basin of the Olt River<br />

Daniela Minodora ILIE.....................................................................................................................................<br />

Program of prevention and control of fungus infestation of grain and fod<strong>de</strong>r, human and animal<br />

protection against mycotoxins<br />

Ioan Aurel POP, Augustin CURTICĂPEAN, Alin GULEA, Cornel PODAR, Iustina LOBONTIU..............<br />

Data on the dynamics of some microbial groups in soils with different trophic status in Cumpăna<br />

region (Dobrudja)<br />

Elena DELCĂ………………………………………………………………………………………………...<br />

The agricultural potential of phosphogypsum waste piles<br />

Lucian MATEI………………………………………………………………………………………………..<br />

115<br />

121<br />

127<br />

139<br />

147<br />

157<br />

163<br />

171<br />

177<br />

181<br />

185


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

LIMITATIVE MYCOTIC FACTORS FOR SOME PLANTS FROM THE<br />

BULGARIAN COAST OF THE BLACK SEA<br />

Gavril NEGREAN<br />

Universitatea din Bucureşti, Grădina Botanică, Şoseaua Cotroceni nr. 32, Bucureşti<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: We present a list of 119 parasitic fungi collected in Bulgaria from the following groups:<br />

Peronospor<strong>ale</strong>s, Ascomycetes, Uredin<strong>ale</strong>s, Ustilagin<strong>ale</strong>s, Agaric<strong>ale</strong>s, Polypor<strong>ale</strong>s, Gasteromycet<strong>ale</strong>s and Fungi<br />

Anamorphici. An alien rust new for Bulgaria is also found (Puccinia komarovii).<br />

There are also some commentaries regarding the rare plants guested by different fungi; other fungi may<br />

contribute to the diminishing of the damages produces by some weeds; we draw attention about some foreign<br />

fungi with invasive character.<br />

Keywords: New parasitic fungi for Bulgaria, invasive fungi, matrix nova, Dobrogea, Bulgaria.<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction.<br />

Following our preoccupa-tion regarding the<br />

limitative factors for the vascular plants on the<br />

Black Sea, we present the results of our<br />

investigations on the Bulgarian Dobrogean Black<br />

Sea si<strong>de</strong>. Our observations from the previous years<br />

were published within several notes [1, 2, 3, 4, 19].<br />

2. Material and Methods.<br />

The fungi were collected from the areas nearby<br />

the sea si<strong>de</strong> between Duranculac and the<br />

embouchure of the Batovo valley, in April and June<br />

2006 and April – October 2008. A very small<br />

amount of fungi collectetd from other areas of<br />

Bulgaria, they also listed. The big majority are<br />

coming from the Dobrich district. The materials<br />

were collected on the way and their conditioning<br />

was donje in conformity with the usual techniques<br />

and <strong>de</strong>terminated by help of the instruments we had<br />

at our disposal [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14].<br />

The nomenclature of the authors of the hosts<br />

after Flora Romaniae [15] and Flora Europaea [16,<br />

17]. The conditionated and <strong>de</strong>termined materials<br />

were <strong>de</strong>posited in the Herbarium of the University<br />

from Bucureşti [BUC] and partially in the<br />

Herbarium of the Botanic Institute from Sofija<br />

[SOM]. The list is alphabetically coordinated, on<br />

big groups offungi and the coronims from North to<br />

South.<br />

3. Results and Discussions<br />

In these two years mentioned, there were<br />

collected 217 specimens, representing the analized<br />

groups of fungi (Table 1). Apparently, a number of<br />

16 combinations fungus – host plant („matrix<br />

nova”), incase of the Peronospor<strong>ale</strong>s (Table 2), and<br />

were not indicated since Bulgaria [14]. Among<br />

Erysiphaceae, 19 combinations [8], alike species<br />

have not been found in Bulgaria. Likewise, a<br />

number of 15 combinations between Uredin<strong>ale</strong>s [7]<br />

do not seem to be cited from Bulgaria. Puccinia<br />

komarovii rust, guesting the alien plant Impatiens<br />

parviflora DC. is new for the Bulgarian mycobiota.<br />

Sozological aspects.<br />

Following a long cohabitation (co evolution)<br />

between fungi and their hosts there has been created<br />

an equilibrum, so that we have barely noticed<br />

ruptures of this equilibrum. Among the rare guested<br />

plants, we mention the following: Astragalus<br />

cornutus (important damages locally), Buglossoi<strong>de</strong>s<br />

arvensis subsp. sibthorpiana, Centaurea<br />

salonitana, Centaurea thracica, Clypeo-la<br />

jonthlaspi, Dianthus leptopetalus, Euphorbia<br />

myrsinites, Gypsophila pallasii, Hieracium bauhinii,<br />

Leymus racemosus subsp. sabulosus, Limonium<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


Limitative mycotic factors from some plants.../ Ovidius University Annals of Biology-Ecology 14: 3-15 (2010)<br />

meyeri, Onosma rigidum, Potentilla taurica, Rhagadiolus<br />

stellatus, Scilla bithynica, Sherardia arvensis<br />

L. subsp. maritima etc.<br />

Some plants are extremely important from the<br />

sozological point of view, taking into consi<strong>de</strong>ration<br />

that they are in contact with new climatic<br />

conditions being subjected to the eventual<br />

speciation phenomena. It will be the case of Astragalus<br />

cornutus, Beta trigyna, Carduus pycnocephalus,<br />

Euphorbia dobrogensis, Medicago arabica,<br />

Pimpinella peregrina, Plumbago europaea, Ranunculus<br />

oxyspermus, Rumex tuberosus subsp. tuberosus,<br />

Scilla bithynica etc.<br />

Some fungi can have a certain play in<br />

diminishing the population of some weeds,<br />

contributiong this way to the diminution of the<br />

damages they produce, such as Amaranthus retroflexus,<br />

Avena fatua, Bassia scoparia, Carduus<br />

acanthoi<strong>de</strong>s, Lycium barbarum, Malva sylvestris,<br />

Picris echioi<strong>de</strong>s (carantin plant), Rumex patientia<br />

etc.<br />

I collecting some alien fungi with invasiv<br />

character in present (Puccinia malvacearum, Erysiphe<br />

mougeotii, Puccinia helianthi) or in future<br />

(Puccinia komarovii, Puccinia pelargonii-zonalis).<br />

The hyperparasite Ampelomyces quisqua-lis,<br />

also contributes the diminution of the damnages<br />

produced by some mil<strong>de</strong>w, there have been registered<br />

some cases.<br />

Last but not least, we consi<strong>de</strong>r that the fungi<br />

have their right to live.<br />

4. Conclusions.<br />

From the 115 fungi collec-ted from the seasi<strong>de</strong><br />

of the Bulgarian Dobrogea, the most majority are<br />

plants parasites. Most of them belong the groups:<br />

Peronspor<strong>ale</strong>s, Erysiphaceae, Uredin<strong>ale</strong>s and Fungi<br />

Anamorphici. The results are important ones: a new<br />

adventitious parasite rust for the Bulgarian<br />

mycobiota and a number of 50 combinations from<br />

Bulgaria apparently not o<strong>de</strong>ntiofied in their form by<br />

now. We ascertained that following a long coexistence,<br />

between fungi and their hosts, the plants,<br />

there has been created a rather stable equilibrium.<br />

4<br />

LIST OF SPECIES<br />

PERONOSPORALES<br />

Albugo amaranthi (Schwein.) O. Kuntze<br />

(Wilsonia bliti (Biv.) Thines), matrix:<br />

Amaranthus retroflexus L. - Camen Briag,<br />

centrum, in locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º27′20.83″N,<br />

28º33′04.63″E, alt. circa 35m, 23 X 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (11.594) [BUC]. Cavarna S, prope hotel,<br />

in locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º21′17.41″N, 28º21′17.41″E,<br />

alt. circa 30 m, 10 VIII 2008, G. Negrean (11.484)<br />

[BUC].<br />

Albugo candida (Pers.) Roussel, matrix:<br />

Alyssum <strong>de</strong>sertorum Stapf - Bălgarevo E, Cap<br />

Caliacra W 2 km, in herbosis et petrosis, 14 IV<br />

2006, G. Negrean (7065c) [BUC].<br />

Alyssum hirsutum Bieb. - Duranculac E, ad littore<br />

Mare Nigrum, in locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º41′908″N,<br />

28º34′300″E, alt. circa 5 m, 11 IV 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.220) [BUC].<br />

Camelina rumelica Velen. - Cavarna E, in<br />

herbosis, 12 IV 2008, G. Negrean (10.256) [BUC].<br />

Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medicus - Balcic,<br />

centrum, in cortis moscheii, ru<strong>de</strong>ral, 13 IV 2006, G.<br />

Negrean (7043) [BUC]. Balcic, centrum, ru<strong>de</strong>ral, 4<br />

VI 2006, G. Negrean (7252) [BUC]. Sofija S, prope<br />

Hotel Vitosha (N), ru<strong>de</strong>ral, 24 VI 2006, G. Negrean<br />

(7370).<br />

Clypeola jonthlaspi L. - Bălgarevo E, ut Cap<br />

Caliacra, in herbosis, 14 IV 2006, G. Negrean<br />

(7072a) [BUC]. Cavarna E, in herbosis,<br />

43º24′25.14″N, 28º22′19.22″E, alt. circa 60 m, 12<br />

IV 2008, G. Negrean (10.291) [BUC].<br />

Sisymbrium loeselii L. - Sofija S, prope Univ.<br />

Technica, 21 VI 2006, G. Negrean (7323) [BUC].<br />

Sofija S, prope Hotel Vitosha (N), ru<strong>de</strong>ral, 24 VI<br />

2006, G. Negrean (7382) [BUC].<br />

Sisymbrium orient<strong>ale</strong> L. s. l. - Duranculac E, ad<br />

littore Mare Nigrum, in locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis,<br />

43º41′908″N, 28º34′300″E, alt. circa 5 m, 9 V<br />

2008, G. Negrean (10.436) [BUC].<br />

Albugo portulacae (DC. ex Duby) O. Kuntze,<br />

matrix:<br />

Portulaca oleracea L. subsp. oleracea - Sozopol,<br />

in arenosis, 42º24′05.22″N, 27º42′33.32″E, alt.<br />

circa 15 m, 9 VIII 2008, G. Negrean (11.888)<br />

[BUC].


Gavril Negrean/ Ovidius University Annals of Biology-Ecology 14: 3-15 (2010)<br />

Albugo tragopogonis (DC.) Gray, matrix:<br />

Xeranthemum annuum L. - Cavarna E, in<br />

herbosis, 43º24′25.14″N, 28º22′19.22″E, alt. circa<br />

60 m, 12 IV 2008, G. Negrean (11.504) [BUC].<br />

Ecrene N, ad oram rivuli Batova, in arenosis,<br />

43º21′10.43″N, 28º04′31.74″E, alt. circa 2 m, 13 IV<br />

2006, G. Negrean (7050) [BUC].<br />

Bremia lactucae Regel, matrix:<br />

Carduus acanthoi<strong>de</strong>s L. - Bălgarevo E, Cap<br />

Caliacra, vers E, ut Mare Nigrum, in herbosis<br />

ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 15 IV 2006, G. Negrean (7074a) [BUC].<br />

Cavarna SW, Bojorets S, Caliacria, in locis<br />

ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º25′03.47″N, 28º16′48.25″E, alt. circa<br />

46 m, 22 X 2008, G. Negrean (11.521) [BUC].<br />

Picris echioi<strong>de</strong>s L. - Camen Briag, in locis<br />

ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º27′18.92″N, 28º33′14.19″E, alt. circa<br />

35 m, 23 X 2008, G. Negrean (11.551) [BUC].<br />

Rhagadiolus stellatus (L.) Gaertn. - Rusalca, sub<br />

platous prope littore Mare Nigrum, in abruptis et<br />

silvis, 43º24′733″N, 28º29′780″E, alt. circa 60 m,<br />

10 V 2008, G. Negrean (10.459) [BUC].<br />

Crepis pulchra L. - Bălgarevo E, Cap Caliacra N,<br />

sinistra vallis Bolata-Dere, in herbosis,<br />

43º22′59.37″N, 28º28′18.08″E, alt. circa 2 m, 4 VI<br />

2006, G. Negrean (7397) [BUC].<br />

Hyaloperonospora parasitica (Pers.: Fr.)<br />

Constant., matrix:<br />

Alyssum <strong>de</strong>sertorum Stapf - Bălgarevo E, Cap<br />

Caliacra W 2 km, in herbosis et petrosis, 14 IV<br />

2006, G. Negrean (7065b) [BUC].<br />

Hyaloperonospora tribulina (Pass.) Constant.<br />

(Peronospora tribulina Pass.), matrix:<br />

Tribulus terrestris L. - Cavarna SW, Caliacria, in<br />

locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º25′03.47″N, 28º16′48.25″E, alt.<br />

circa 46 m, 22 X 2008, G. Negrean (11.511)<br />

[BUC].<br />

Peronospora aestivalis H. Syd., matrix:<br />

Melilotus sp. - Balcic W, in herbosis, 3 VI 2006,<br />

G. Negrean (7225) [BUC].<br />

Peronospora alsinearum Casp., matrix:<br />

Stellaria media (L.) Vill. s. l., Ecrene N, ad oram<br />

rivuli Batova, 43º21′10.43″N, 28º04′31.74″E, alt.<br />

circa 2 m, 13 IV 2006, G. Negrean (7820) [BUC].<br />

Peronospora alta Fuckel, matrix:<br />

Plantago major L. subsp. major, Sofija S, prope<br />

Hotel Moskva, 22 VI 2006, G. Negrean (7328)<br />

[BUC].<br />

Peronospora arborescens (Berk.) <strong>de</strong> Bary,<br />

matrix:<br />

5<br />

Papaver dubium L. - Bălgarevo E, Cap Caliacra,<br />

vers E, ut Mare Nigrum, in herbosis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis,<br />

43º22′03.97″N, 28º27′57.08″E, alt. circa 25 m, 15<br />

IV 2006, G. Negrean (7079) [BUC].<br />

Peronospora astragalina Syd., matrix:<br />

Astragalus hamosus L. - Crapetz E, prope Cap<br />

Crapetz, solo arenoso, 43º38′23.64″N,<br />

28º34′25.86″E, alt. circa 6 m, 12 IV 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.242) [BUC].<br />

Peronospora calotheca <strong>de</strong> Bary, matrix:<br />

Galium aparine L. - Crapetz E, prope Cap Crapetz,<br />

solo arenoso, 43º38′23.64″N, 28º34′25.86″E, alt. circa<br />

6 m, 12 IV 2008, G. Negrean (10.246) [BUC].<br />

Bălgarevo SE, Vallis Bolata, ad saxa calcarea, solo<br />

terra-rossa, 43º22′59.77″N, 28º28′20.77″E, alt. circa 15<br />

m, 12 IV 2008, G. Negrean (10.270) [BUC].<br />

Peronospora conglomerata Fuckel, matrix:<br />

Erodium ciconium (L.) L’Herit. - Cavarna S, in<br />

arenosis, sub Collina Cheracman, 12 IV 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.241) [BUC]. Cavarna SW, Bojorets S,<br />

Caliacria, in locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º25′03.47″N,<br />

28º16′48.25″E, alt. circa 46 m, 22 X 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (11.588) [BUC].<br />

Peronospora farinosa (Fr.) Fr., matrix:<br />

Bassia scoparia (L.) A. J. Scott, Sofija S, cartier<br />

S, ru<strong>de</strong>ral, 22 VI 2006, G. Negrean (7330) [BUC].<br />

Chenopodium album (Boiss.) Kuntze - Camen<br />

Briag, Motel, in locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º27′13.83″N,<br />

28º33′04.96″E, alt. circa 25 m, 7 VI 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.707) [BUC].<br />

Chenopodium opulifolium Schrad. ex Koch & Ziz<br />

- Cavarna S, prope hotel, in locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis,<br />

43º21′17.41″N, 28º21′17.41″E, alt. circa 30 m, 10<br />

VIII 2008, G. Negrean (11.484) [BUC].<br />

Peronospora ficariae L.R. Tul. ex <strong>de</strong> Bary,<br />

matrix:<br />

Ranunculus ficaria L. subsp. calthifolius<br />

(Reichenb.) Arcangeli - Balcic W, in locis umbrosis,<br />

15 IV 2006, G. Negrean (7090) [BUC].<br />

Peronospora medicaginis-minimae<br />

Gaponenko, matrix:<br />

Medicago lupulina L., Sofija S, prope Hotel<br />

Vitosha, ru<strong>de</strong>ral, 22 VI 2006, G. Negrean (7321)<br />

[BUC].<br />

Peronospora sherardiae Fuckel, matrix:<br />

Sherardia arvensis L. subsp. maritima (Griseb.)<br />

Soják - Bălgarevo E, Cap Caliacra, in herbosis,<br />

43º22′03.97″N, 28º26′57.08″E, alt. circa 25 m, 12


Limitative mycotic factors from some plants.../ Ovidius University Annals of Biology-Ecology 14: 3-15 (2010)<br />

IV 2008, G. Negrean (10.234) [BUC]. Balcic W, in<br />

herbosis, 15 IV 2006, G. Negrean (7087a) [BUC].<br />

Peronospora tribulina Pass. = Hyaloperonospora<br />

tribulina (Pass.) Constant.<br />

Peronospora v<strong>ale</strong>rianellae Fuckel, matrix:<br />

V<strong>ale</strong>rianella sp. - Crapetz E, prope Cap Crapetz,<br />

solo arenoso, 43º38′23.64″N, 28º34′25.86″E, alt.<br />

circa 6 m, 12 IV 2008, G. Negrean (10.245) [BUC].<br />

Peronospora viciae (Berk.) <strong>de</strong> Bary, matrix:<br />

Vicia sativa L. subsp. nigra (L.) Ehrh. -<br />

Duranculac S, in herbosis, 43º39′53.06″N,<br />

28º31′15.26″E, alt. c. 12 m, 13 IV 2006, G.<br />

Negrean (7036) [BUC]. Rusalca NNE, in herbosis,<br />

43º25′34.94″N, 28º31′51.46″E, alt. circa 8 m, 12 IV<br />

2008, G. Negrean (10.277) [BUC].<br />

Plasmopara nivea (Unger) J. Schröt.<br />

(Plasmopara umbelliferarum (Casp.) J. Schröt. ex<br />

Wartenw.), matrix:<br />

Aegopodium podagraria L., Sofija S, Montes<br />

Vitosha, in herbosis subalpinis, 23 VI 2006, G.<br />

Negrean (7353) [BUC].<br />

ASCOMYCOTA<br />

Blumeria graminis (DC. ) Speer, matrix:<br />

Avena fatua L. - Rusalca, sub platou prope littore<br />

Mare Nigrum, in herbosis, 43º25′116″N,<br />

28º31′126″E, alt. circa 10 m, 7 VI 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.646) [BUC].<br />

Aegilops lorentii Hochst. - Rusalca, sub platou<br />

prope littore Mare Nigrum, in herbosis,<br />

43º24′750″N, 28º29′790″E, alt. circa 15 m, 10 V<br />

2008, G. Negrean (10.465) [BUC].<br />

Hor<strong>de</strong>um bulbosum L. Dobrogea, Shabla E, ad<br />

littore Mare Nigrum, in locis herbosis,<br />

43º33′707″N, 28º35′553″E, alt. circa 2 m, 9 V<br />

2008, G. Negrean (11.572) [BUC].<br />

Daldinia concentrica (Bolton) Ces. & De Not.<br />

- matrix: in lignos, Duranculac E, ad littore Mare<br />

Nigrum, in locis arenosis, 43º41′908″N,<br />

28º34′300″E, alt. circa 5 m, 11 IV 2008, Leg. P.<br />

Anastasiu, <strong>de</strong>t. G. Negrean (11.593) [BUC].<br />

Epichloe typhina (Pers.: Fr.) Tul., matrix:<br />

Dactylis glomerata L. s. l., Sofija S, prope Hotel<br />

Moskva, in herbosis, 22 VI 2006, G. Negrean<br />

(7331).<br />

Erysiphe alphitoi<strong>de</strong>s (Griffon & Maubl.) U.<br />

Braun & S. Takam. (Microsphaera alphitoi<strong>de</strong>s<br />

Griffon & Maubl.), matrix:<br />

6<br />

Quercus pubescens Willd. - Bălgarevo E,<br />

Rusalca, prope littore Mare Nigrum, sub abruptum,<br />

10 VIII 2008, G. Negrean (11.503) [BUC].<br />

Quercus robur L., Sofija S, prope Hotel Vitosha<br />

(N), ru<strong>de</strong>ral, 24 VI 2006, G. Negrean (7379).<br />

Erysiphe aquilegiae DC., matrix:<br />

Aquilegia vulgaris L., - Camen Briag, centrum, in<br />

locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, subspont., 43º27′20.83″N,<br />

28º33′04.63″E, alt. circa 35 m, 23 X 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (11.536, T) [BUC; CL].<br />

Erysiphe artemisiae Grev., matrix:<br />

Artemisia vulgaris L. - Camen Briag, centrum, in<br />

locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º27′20.83″N, 28º33′04.63″E, alt.<br />

circa 35 m, 23 X 2008, G. Negrean (11.532) [BUC].<br />

Erysiphe astragali DC., matrix:<br />

Astragalus hamosus L. - Rusalca, prope littore<br />

Mare Nigrum, in herbosis, 43º25′116″N,<br />

28º31′126″E, alt. circa 10 m, 7 VI 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.660) [BUC].<br />

Erysiphe buhrii U. Braun, matrix:<br />

Gypsophila pallasii Ikonn. - Bălgarevo E, <strong>de</strong>xtra<br />

vallis Bolata Dere, prope littore Mare Nigrum, in<br />

herbosis, 43º23′140″N, 28º28′000″E, alt. circa 35<br />

m, 20 VII 2006, G. Negrean (11.450) [BUC].<br />

Erysipe cichoracearum DC., matrix:<br />

Centaurea salonitana Vis. - Rusalca N, ad littore<br />

Mare Nigrum, in herbosis, 43º25′116″N,<br />

28º31′126″E, alt. circa 10 m, 7 VI 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.720) [BUC]. Yailata, platou prope<br />

littore Mare Nigrum, in saxosis, 43º26′552″N,<br />

28º32′930″E, alt. circa 25 m, 8 VIII 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (11.472) [BUC]. Bălgarevo E, Cap<br />

Caliacra, in herbosis, 43º22′982″N, 28º26′4599″E,<br />

alt. circa 72 m, 8 VI 2008, G. Negrean (10.753)<br />

[BUC]. Balcic E, supra Tuzlata, in herbosis<br />

abruptis, 8 VI 2008, G. Negrean (10.747) [BUC].<br />

Crepis foetida L. subsp. rhoeadifolia (Bieb.)<br />

Čelak., Sofija S, prope Hotel Vitosha (N), ru<strong>de</strong>ral,<br />

24 VI 2006, G. Negrean (7375).<br />

Crepis pulchra L., Sofija S, prope Hotel Vitosha<br />

(N), ru<strong>de</strong>ral, 24 VI 2006, G. Negrean (7371).<br />

Lactuca viminea L. - Rusalca, prope littore Mare<br />

Nigrum, in locis herbosis et petrosis, 43º24′733″N,<br />

28º29′776″E, alt. circa 45 m, 10 V 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.454) [BUC].<br />

Tragopogon dubius Scop., Sofija S, prope Hotel<br />

Vitosha (N), ru<strong>de</strong>ral, 24 VI 2006, G. Negrean<br />

(7376).


Gavril Negrean/ Ovidius University Annals of Biology-Ecology 14: 3-15 (2010)<br />

Erysiphe cruciferarum Opiz ex L. Junell,<br />

matrix:<br />

Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara & Gran<strong>de</strong>,<br />

Sofija S, prope Hotel Moskva, ru<strong>de</strong>ral, 22 VI 2006,<br />

G. Negrean (7324).<br />

Alyssum hirsutum Bieb. - Duranculac E, ad littore<br />

Mare Nigrum, in locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º41′908″N,<br />

28º34′300″E, alt. circa 5 m, 11 IV 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.221) [BUC].<br />

Brassica nigra C. Koch - Bălgarevo SE, ad<br />

littore Mare Nigrum, sub abruptum, prope ferma<br />

pisciculturae, in locis herbosis, 43º25′02.83″N,<br />

28º31′00.18″E, alt. circa 5 m, 10 VIII 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (11.495) [BUC].<br />

Erysiphe cynoglossi (Wallr.) U. Braun, matrix:<br />

Buglossoi<strong>de</strong>s arvensis (L.) I. M. Johnston subsp.<br />

sibthorpiana (Griseb.) R. Fernan<strong>de</strong>s - Balcic W,<br />

Cap Caliacra, in herbosis, 3 VI 2006, G. Negrean<br />

(7295) [BUC].<br />

Echium italicum L. subsp. pyramidatum (DC.) . -<br />

Bălgarevo SE, Cap Caliacra, in herbosis,<br />

43º23′02.13″N, 28º26′53.26″E, alt. circa 30 m, 10<br />

VIII 2008, G. Negrean (11.480) [BUC].<br />

Echium vulgare L., Sofija S, prope Hotel Vitosha<br />

(N), ru<strong>de</strong>ral, 25 VI 2006, G. Negrean (7383)<br />

[BUC].<br />

Onosma rigidum Le<strong>de</strong>b. - Yailata, prope littore<br />

Mare Nigrum, in abruptis, 43º26′552″N,<br />

28º32′930″E, alt. circa 45 m, 7 VI 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (11.124, A) [BUC].<br />

Erysiphe <strong>de</strong>pressa (Wallr.) Schltdl – A,<br />

matrix:<br />

Onopordum acanthium L. - Cavarna SW, Bojorets<br />

S, Caliacria, 43º25′03.47″N, 28º16′48.25″E, alt.<br />

circa 46 m, 22 X 2008, G. Negrean (11.525) [BUC].<br />

Erysiphe g<strong>ale</strong>opsidis DC. = Neoerysiphe<br />

g<strong>ale</strong>opsidis (DC.) U. Braun<br />

Erysipe heraclei DC., matrix:<br />

Myrrhoi<strong>de</strong>s nodosa (L.) Cannon - Rusalca, sub<br />

platou prope littore Mare Nigrum, in herbosis,<br />

43º24′750″N, 28º29′790″E, alt. circa 15 m, 10 V<br />

2008, G. Negrean (10.465) [BUC].<br />

Scandix pecten-veneris L. subsp. pecten-veneris -<br />

Rusalca, sub platou prope littore Mare Nigrum, in<br />

herbosis, 43º25′116″N, 28º31′126″E, alt. circa 10<br />

m, 7 VI 2008, G. Negrean (10.650) [BUC].<br />

Tordylium maximum L. - Rusalca, sub platou<br />

prope littore Mare Nigrum, in fossa viam,<br />

7<br />

43º25′120″N, 28º31′125″E, alt. circa 12 m, 12 IV<br />

2008, G. Negrean (11.413) [BUC].<br />

Torilis nodosa (L.) Gaertner - Rusalca, ad littore<br />

Mare Nigrum, in herbosis prope marem,<br />

43º25′116″N, 28º31′126″E, alt. circa 10 m, 7 VI<br />

2008, G. Negrean (10.784) [BUC].<br />

Erysiphe knautiae Duby, matrix:<br />

Knautia arvensis (L.) Coulter, Sofija S, prope<br />

Hotel Vitosha, in herbosis, 22 VI 2006, G. Negrean<br />

(7335) [BUC].<br />

Erysiphe lycopsidis R. Y. Zheng & G. Q.<br />

Chen, matrix:<br />

Anchusa arvensis (L.) Bieb. - Shabla E, ad littore<br />

Mare Nigrum, in locis herbosis, 43º24′954N″,<br />

28º30′061″E, alt. circa 10 m, 6 VI 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.641) [BUC].<br />

Erysiphe mougeotii (Lév.) <strong>de</strong> Bary, matrix:<br />

Lycium barbarum L. - Cavarna, centrum,<br />

43º26′13.44″N, 28º20′36.38″E, alt. circa 127 m, 23<br />

X 2008, G. Negrean (11.543) [BUC].<br />

Erysiphe polyphaga Hammarl. = Golovinomyces<br />

orontii (Castagne) V. P. Heliuta<br />

Erysiphe ranunculi Grev., matrix:<br />

Ranunculus constantinopolitanus (DC.) D’Urv. -<br />

Ecrene N, ad oram rivuli Batova, 43º21′10.43″N,<br />

28º04′31.74″E, alt. circa 2 m, 3 VI 2006, G.<br />

Negrean (7236) [BUC].<br />

Erysiphe thesii L. Junell, matrix:<br />

Thesium alpinum L., Sofija S, Montes Vitosha, in<br />

herbosis subalpinis, 23 VI 2006, G. Negrean (7347)<br />

[BUC].<br />

Erysiphe trifolii Grev., matrix:<br />

Medicago arabica L. - Camen Brjag, centrum, in<br />

locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º27′20.83″N, 28º33′04.63″E, alt.<br />

circa 35 m, 23 X 2008, G. Negrean (11.531, A)<br />

[BUC].<br />

Melilotus officinalis (L.) Pallas - Cavarna SW,<br />

Bojorets S, Caliacria, in locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis,<br />

43º25′03.47″N, 28º16′48.25″E, alt. circa 46 m, 22<br />

X 2008, G. Negrean (11.522) [BUC]. Sofija S,<br />

prope Hotel Moskva, in herbosis, 22 VI 2006, G.<br />

Negrean (7333) [BUC].<br />

Trifolium hybridum L. subsp. elegans (Savi)<br />

Aschers. & Graebn., Sofija S, Hortus Botanicus, in<br />

herbosis, 20 VI 2006, G. Negrean (7313) [BUC].<br />

Golovinomyces orontii (Castagne) V. P.<br />

Heliuta (Erysiphe polyphaga Hammarl.), matrix:


Limitative mycotic factors from some plants.../ Ovidius University Annals of Biology-Ecology 14: 3-15 (2010)<br />

Sedum sarmentosum Bunge - Camen Brjag, motel,<br />

cult., 43º27′20.40″N, 28º33′13.07″E, alt. circa 35<br />

m, 7 VI 2008, G. Negrean (10.697) [BUC].<br />

Neoerysiphe g<strong>ale</strong>opsidis (DC.) U. Braun<br />

(Erysiphe g<strong>ale</strong>opsidis DC.), matrix:<br />

Lamium amplexicaule L. Duranculac E, ad littore<br />

Mare Nigrum, in locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º41′908″N,<br />

28º34′300E, alt. circa 5 m, 9 V 2008, G. Negrean<br />

(10.434) [BUC]. Cavarna S, prope hotel, in locis<br />

ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º24′50.69″N, 28º21′16.92″E, alt. circa<br />

20 m, 12 IV 2008, G. Negrean (10.250) [BUC].<br />

Balcic, centrum, ru<strong>de</strong>ral, 4 VI 2006, G. Negrean<br />

(7252) [BUC]. Sofija, centrum, 20 VI 2005, G.<br />

Negrean (6136) [BUC].<br />

Phyllactinia guttata (Wallr.: Fr.) Lév., matrix:<br />

Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl subsp. oxycarpa<br />

(Bieb. ex Willd.) Franco & Rocha Afonso -<br />

Cavarna, centrum, 43º26′13.44″N, 28º20′36.38″E,<br />

alt. circa 127 m, 23 X 2008, G. Negrean (11.549)<br />

[BUC].<br />

Podosphaera euphorbiae (Castagne) U. Braun<br />

& S. Takam., matrix:<br />

Euphorbia esula L. subsp. orientalis (Boiss.)<br />

Molero & Rovira, 1992 (Euphorbia esula subsp.<br />

tommasini-ana (Bertol.) Nyman) - Bălgarevo SE,<br />

Cap Caliacra, in herbosis, 43º23′02.13″N,<br />

28º26′53.26″E, alt. circa 70 m, 10 VIII 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (11.486) [BUC].<br />

Sawa<strong>de</strong>a bicornis (Wallr.: Fr.) Homma<br />

(Uncinula bicornis (Wallr.: Fr.) Lév., matrix:<br />

Acer negundo L., subspont., Sofija S, prope Univ.<br />

Technica, 21 VI 2006, G. Negrean (7319) [BUC].<br />

Sphaerotheca aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun,<br />

matrix:<br />

Geum urbanum L., Sofija S, prope Hotel<br />

Moskva, 22 VI 2006, G. Negrean (7324) [BUC].<br />

Sphaerotheca fugax Penz. & Sacc., matrix:<br />

Erodium ciconium (L.) L’Hér. - Bălgarevo E, Cap<br />

Caliacra, in herebosis, 3 VI 2006, G. Negrean<br />

(7256) [BUC].<br />

Geranium rotundifolium L. - Bălgarevo E, Cap<br />

Caliacra, vers E, ut Mare Nigrum, in herbosis<br />

ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 15 IV 2006, G. Negrean (7071a) [BUC].<br />

Bălgarevo SE, Vallis Bolata, ad saxa calcarea, solo<br />

terra-rossa, 43º22′59.77″N, 28º28′20.77″E, alt. circa<br />

15 m, 12 IV 2008, G. Negrean (10.267) [BUC].<br />

Taphrina <strong>de</strong>formans (Berk.) Tul., matrix:<br />

8<br />

Prunus dulcis Miller - Balcic, prope Hortus<br />

Botanicus, cult., 2 V 2008, G. Negrean (10.343)<br />

[BUC].<br />

Prunus persica (L.) Batsch - Bălgarevo E, Cap<br />

Caliacra, cult., 30 IV 2008, G. Negrean (10.358)<br />

[BUC].<br />

Taphrina pruni Tul., matrix:<br />

Prunus cerasifera Ehrh. - Shabla E, prope littore<br />

Mare Nigrum, 43º33′755″N, 28º35′250″E, alt. circa<br />

3 m, 9 V 2008, G. Negrean (11.112) [BUC].<br />

Prunus domestica L. - Balcic, prope hotel<br />

Eisberg, cult., 30 IV 2008, G. Negrean (10.359)<br />

[BUC].<br />

Venturia geranii (Fr.) G. Winter, matrix:<br />

Erodium ciconium (L.) L’Herit. - Duranculac E,<br />

ad littore Mare Nigrum, in locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis,<br />

43º41′908″N, 28º34′300″E, alt. circa 5 m, 11 IV<br />

2008, G. Negrean (10.224) [BUC], 9 V 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.430) [BUC].<br />

UREDINALES:<br />

Aecidium euphorbiae Link, O, I, matrix:<br />

Euphorbia agraria Bieb. - Bălgarevo E, ut Cap<br />

Caliacra, in herbosis, 14 IV 2006, G. Negrean<br />

(7064a) [BUC]. Bălgarevo E, Cap Caliacra, in<br />

herbosis, 43º22′03.97″N, 28º27′57.08″E, alt. circa<br />

25 m, 12 IV 2008, G. Negrean (10.239 [BUC].<br />

Euphorbia myrsinites L. - Bălgarevo E, vallis<br />

Bolata Dere, terra rossa, 43º23′08.40″N,<br />

28º27′59.49″E, alt. circa 11 m, 12 IV 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.268) [BUC]. Bălgarevo E, Cap<br />

Caliacra, in herbosis, 43º22′982″N, 28º26′459″E,<br />

alt. circa 72 m, 12 IV 2008, G. Negrean (10.236)<br />

[BUC].<br />

Euphorbia nicaeensis All. s. l. - Crapetz, ut<br />

f<strong>ale</strong>za, in herbosis, 12 IV 2008, G. Negrean<br />

(10.240) [BUC].<br />

Euphorbia seguieriana Necker - Duranculac E, ad<br />

littore Mare Nigrum, in locis arenosis,<br />

43º41′908″N, 28 º34′300″E, alt. circa 5 m, 11 IV<br />

2008, G. Negrean (10.217) [BUC].<br />

Melampsora euphorbiae (Ficinus & C.<br />

Schub.) Castagne, matrix:<br />

Euphorbia helioscopia L. - Duranculac E, ad<br />

littore Mare Nigrum, in locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis,<br />

43º41′908″N, 28º34′300″E, alt. circa 5 m, 9 V<br />

2008, G. Negrean (10.431, ii, iii) [BUC].<br />

Duranculac E, ad littore Mare Nigrum, in locis


Gavril Negrean/ Ovidius University Annals of Biology-Ecology 14: 3-15 (2010)<br />

ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º41′908″N, 28º34′300″E, alt. circa 5 m,<br />

6 VI 2008, G. Negrean (10.598) [BUC]. Rusalca,<br />

sub platou prope littore Mare Nigrum, in herbosis,<br />

43º25′116″N, 28º31′126″E, alt. circa 10 m, 7 VI<br />

2008, G. Negrean (10.661) [BUC]. Bălgarevo E,<br />

Cap Caliacra, in herbosis, 43º22′982″N,<br />

28º26′459″E, alt. circa 72 m, 12 IV 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.233, ii, iii) [BUC]. Bălgarevo E, inter<br />

Cap Caliacra et Bolata Dere, prope littore Mare<br />

Nigrum, in herbosis, 43º22′405-23′144″N,<br />

28º27′928-965″E, alt. circa 30 m, 11 V 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.497) [BUC]. Cavarna, sub Montes<br />

Cheracman, 30 IV 2008, G. Negrean (10.376)<br />

[BUC].<br />

Phragmidium mucronatum (Pers.) Schltdl,<br />

matrix:<br />

Rosa canina L. - Rusalca, prope littore Mare<br />

Nigrum, in herbosis et petrosis, 43º24′733″N,<br />

28º29′776″E, alt. circa 55 m, 10 V 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.462, i) [BUC].<br />

Phragmidium potentillae (Pers.) P. Karst.,<br />

matrix:<br />

Potentilla pedata Nestler - Bălgarevo E, Cap<br />

Caliacra, in herebosis, 4 VI 2006, G. Negrean<br />

(7294) [BUC].<br />

Potentilla taurica Willd. - Shabla E, ad littore<br />

Mare Nigrum, in locis herbosis, 43º24′954″N,<br />

28º30′061″E, alt. circa 10 m, 6 VI 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.638) [BUC].<br />

Phragmidium sanguisorbae (DC.) Schröt.,<br />

matrix:<br />

Sanguisorba minor Scop. s. l., Sofija S, prope<br />

Hotel Vitosha (N), ad viam ferream, 26 VI 2006, G.<br />

Negrean (7372) [BUC].<br />

Phragmidium violaceum (Schultz) G. Winter,<br />

matrix:<br />

Rubus candicans Weihe ex Rchb. - Bălgarevo E,<br />

Rusalca, in herbosis, supra Mare Nigrum,<br />

43º25′02.98″N, 28º30′50.05″E, alt. circa 20 m, 19<br />

VII 2008, G. Negrean (11.406) [BUC].<br />

Rubus discolor Weihe & Nees - Bălgarevo SE,<br />

prope littore Mare Nigrum, sub abruptum, prope<br />

ferma pisciculturae, in locis herbosis,<br />

43º25′02.83″N, 28º31′00.18″E, alt. circa 5 m, 10<br />

VIII 2008, G. Negrean (11.498, ii) [BUC].<br />

Puccinia allii (DC.) F. Rudolphi, matrix:<br />

Allium tauricum (Besser ex Rchb.) Grossh. –<br />

Bălgarevo E, Cap Caliacra, 43º22′982″N,<br />

9<br />

28º26′459″E, alt. circa 72 m, 12 IV 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.288) [BUC, ii].<br />

Allium sp. - Ecrene N, ad oram rivuli Batova, in<br />

herbosis, 43º20′55.87″N, 28º04′25.15″E, alt. circa 1<br />

m, 3 VI 2006, G. Negrean (7235) [BUC].<br />

Puccinia asperulae-cynanchicae Wurth,<br />

matrix:<br />

Asperula tenella Heuffel ex Boiss. - NE Bulgaria:<br />

prov. Burgas: Aitos, in petrosis, 11 VI 1973, G.<br />

Negrean [BUC].<br />

Puccinia calcitrapae DC., matrix:<br />

Carduus pycnocephalus L. - Rusalca, sub platou<br />

prope littore Mare Nigrum, in saxosis,<br />

43º25′116″N, 28º31′126″E, alt. circa 10 m, 7 VI<br />

2008, G. Negrean (10.698, iii) [BUC].<br />

Centaurea thracica (Janka) Hayek - Bălgarevo E,<br />

<strong>de</strong>xtra vallis Bolata Dere, in herbosis, 43º23′144″N,<br />

28º27′965E″, alt. circa 34 m, 6 VI 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.785) [BUC].<br />

Puccinia cesatii J. Schröt., matrix:<br />

Dichanthium ischemum (L.) Roberty - Bălgarevo<br />

SE, Cap Caliacra, 43º23′02.13″N, 28º26′53.26″E,<br />

alt. circa 30 m, 10 VIII 2008, G. Negrean (11.483)<br />

[BUC].<br />

Puccinia crepidis J. Schröt., matrix:<br />

Crepis foetida L. subsp. rhoeadifolia (Bieb.)<br />

Čelak. - Bălgarevo SE, Cap Caliacra, in herbosis<br />

ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, prope Archer (Boris Caragea),<br />

43º21′38.78″N, 28º27′55.78″E, alt. circa 8 m, 11 IV<br />

2008, G. Negrean (10.231) [BUC]. Cap Caliacra, in<br />

herbosis, 43º22′03.97″N, 28º27′57.08″E , alt. circa<br />

30 m, 8 VI 2008, G. Negrean (10.753) [BUC].<br />

Puccinia dobrogensis Săvul. & O. Săvul. (?=<br />

Puccinia caucasica Savelli), matrix:<br />

Iris pumila L. - Bălgarevo E, Cap Caliacra, in<br />

herbosis, 43º22′03.97″N, 28º27′57.08″E, alt. circa<br />

25 m, 8 VI 2008, G. Negrean (11.120) [BUC].<br />

Puccinia gladioli (Requien) Cast., I, matrix:<br />

V<strong>ale</strong>rianella costata (Steven) Betcke - Bălgarevo<br />

E, Cap Caliacra, situs archaeologicus, in herbosis,<br />

14 IV 2006, G. Negrean (7817) [BUC].<br />

V<strong>ale</strong>rianella sp. - Bălgarevo E, Cap Caliacra, in<br />

herbosis, 43º22′03.97″N, 28º27′57.08″E, alt. circa<br />

25 m, 12 IV 2008, G. Negrean (10.255, i) [BUC].<br />

Cavarna E, in herbosis, 13 IV 2008, G. Negrean<br />

(10.261) [BUC].<br />

Puccinia graminis DC., matrix:<br />

Festuca drymeja Mert. & Koch - distr. Shumen:<br />

Shumen W, Platous Shumen, in silvis,


Limitative mycotic factors from some plants.../ Ovidius University Annals of Biology-Ecology 14: 3-15 (2010)<br />

43º14′55.96″N, 26º53′45.52″E, alt. circa 474 m, 18<br />

VII 2008, G. Negrean (11.603).<br />

Puccinia helianthi Schwein., matrix:<br />

Helianthus annuus L. „Florae Pleno”, cult. -<br />

Camen Briag, centrum, 43º27′20.83″N,<br />

28º33′04.63″E, alt. circa 35 m, 23 X 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (11.537) [BUC].<br />

Puccinia hieracii Mart., matrix:<br />

Hieracium bauhinii Besser, Sofija S, prope Hotel<br />

Vitosha, 22 VI 2006, G. Negrean, matrix conf.<br />

Krahuleć (Pruhonice) (7322) [BUC].<br />

Puccinia isiacae (Thüm.) G. Wint., matrix:<br />

Cardaria draba (L.) Desv. subsp. draba -<br />

Duranculac E, ad littore Mare Nigrum, in ru<strong>de</strong>ratis,<br />

43º41′908″N, 28 º34′300″E, alt. circa 5 m, 9 V<br />

2008, G. Negrean (10.426, i) [BUC].<br />

Puccinia komarovii Tranzschel, matrix:<br />

Impatiens parviflora DC. - Sofija S, Hotel<br />

Vitosha (N), Parc, subspont. ad viam ferream, 24<br />

VI 2006, G. Negrean (7380) [BUC; SOM]. Fungus<br />

adventivus novus Bulgariae. Originally from<br />

Central Asia, alien in Europe. In Romania on<br />

Impatiens parviflora DC., subspont. in Botanical<br />

Gar<strong>de</strong>n of Cluj-Napoca, V<strong>ale</strong>a Pârîul Ţiganilor,<br />

46°51′46″N, 23°35′20″E, alt. 347 m, 5 VII 1993, G.<br />

Negrean [BUCM 129.306].<br />

Puccinia lapsanae Fuckel, matrix:<br />

Lapsana communis L. - Sofija S, prope Hotel<br />

Vitosha (N), ad viam ferream, 24 VI 2006, G.<br />

Negrean (7374) [BUC].<br />

Puccinia malvacearum Bertero ex Mont. – iii,<br />

matrix:<br />

Althaea hirsuta L. - Duranculac E, ad littore<br />

Mare Nigrum, in locis herbosis, 43º40′289″N,<br />

28º33′922″E, alt. circa 5 m, 6 VI 2008, G. Negrean<br />

(11.121) [BUC]. Bălgarevo E, Cap Caliacra, in<br />

herbosis, 43º22′405″N, 28º27′928″E, alt. circa 30<br />

m, 8 VI 2008, G. Negrean (10.767) [BUC].<br />

Malva sylvestris L. - Shabla E, ad littore Mare<br />

Nigrum, in locis herbosis, 43º24′954″N,<br />

28º30′061″E, alt. circa 10 m, 9 V 2008, G. Negrean<br />

(10.444) [BUC]. Yailata, prope littore Mare<br />

Nigrum, in abruptis, 43º26′552″N, 28º32′930″E, alt.<br />

circa 25 m, 10 V 2008, G. Negrean (11.123)<br />

[BUC]. Rusalca NNE, in herbosis, 43º25′34.94″N,<br />

28º31′51.46″E, alt. circa 8 m, 12 IV 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.276) [BUC], 43º24′733″N,<br />

28º29′776″E, alt. circa 65 m, 10 V 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.460) [BUC], Rusalca, ad littore Mare<br />

10<br />

Nigrum, in locis herbosis, 43º24′954″N,<br />

28º30′061″E, alt. circa 10 m, 6 VI 2008, G.<br />

Negrean () [BUC]. Balcic, centrum, in cortis<br />

moscheii, ru<strong>de</strong>ral, 13 IV 2006, G. Negrean (7044)<br />

[BUC]. Nesebăr, in arenosis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis ad littore<br />

Mare Nigrum, 5 VI 2006, G. Negrean (7439)<br />

[BUC].<br />

Puccinia minussensis Thüm., matrix:<br />

Lactuca tatarica (L.) C. A. Meyer - Duranculac<br />

E, ad littore Mare Nigrum, in ru<strong>de</strong>ratis,<br />

43º41′908″N, 28º34′300″E, alt. circa 5 m, 9 V<br />

2008, G. Negrean (10.429) [BUC], 6 VI 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.598) [BUC].<br />

Puccinia pachyphloea Syd. & H. Syd., matrix:<br />

Rumex tuberosus L. subsp. tuberosus - Bălgarevo<br />

E, Cap Caliacra N, Bolata-Dere, in herbosis, 4 VI<br />

2006, G. Negrean (7396) [BUC].<br />

Puccinia pelargonii-zonalis Doidge, matrix:<br />

Pelargonium ×hortorum auct. - Sofija S, Hortus<br />

Botanicus, in caldaria, cult. 42º43′..N, 23º19′...E, 20<br />

VI 2006, G. Negrean (7311) [BUC; SOM].<br />

Puccinia phragmitis (Schumach.) Körn.,<br />

matrix:<br />

Rumex patientia L. s. l. - Duranculac E, ad littore<br />

Mare Nigrum, in ru<strong>de</strong>ratis, 43º41′908″N,<br />

28º34′300″E, alt. circa 5 m, 11 IV 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.285, i) [BUC].<br />

Puccinia pimpinellae (F. Strauss) Link,<br />

matrix:<br />

Pimpinella peregrina L. - Yailata, prope littore<br />

Mare Nigrum, in abruptis, 43º26′552″N,<br />

28º32′930″E, alt. circa 25 m, 10 V 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.465) [BUC]. Rusalca, sub platou prope<br />

littore Mare Nigrum, in herbosis, 43º25′116″N,<br />

28º31′126″E, alt. circa 10 m, 7 VI 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.665) [BUC].<br />

Puccinia procera Dietel & Holw., matrix:<br />

Leymus racemosus (Lam.) Tzvelev subsp.<br />

sabulosus (Beb.) Tzvelev - Shabla E, ad littore<br />

Mare Nigrum, in locis herbosis, 43º33′755″N,<br />

28º35′250″E, alt. circa 3 m, 6 VI 2008, G. Negrean<br />

(10.639, ii) [BUC].<br />

Puccinia punctata Link, matrix:<br />

Galium verum L. subsp. verum - Bălgarevo SE,<br />

prope littore Mare Nigrum, sub abruptum, prope<br />

ferma pisciculturae, in locis herbosis,<br />

43º25′02.83″N, 28º31′00.18″E, alt. circa 5 m, 10<br />

VIII 2008, G. Negrean (11.505) [BUC].<br />

Puccinia recondita Dietel & Holw., matrix:


Gavril Negrean/ Ovidius University Annals of Biology-Ecology 14: 3-15 (2010)<br />

Aegilops cylindrica Host - Duranculac E, ad littore<br />

Mare Nigrum, in locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º41′908″N,<br />

28º34′300″E, alt. circa 5 m, 6 VI 2008, G. Negrean<br />

(10.601) [BUC]. Balcic W, Cap Caliacra, in<br />

herbosis, 3 VI 2006, G. Negrean (7298) [BUC].<br />

Sofija S, prope Hotel Vitosha (N), ru<strong>de</strong>ral, 24 VI<br />

2006, G. Negrean (7377).<br />

Aegilops geniculata Roth - Rusalca, platou prope<br />

littore Mare Nigrum, in locis herbosis et petrosis,<br />

43º24′733″N, 28º29′776″E, alt. circa 60 m, 7 VI<br />

2008, G. Negrean (10.696, iii) [BUC]. Bălgarevo E,<br />

Cap Caliacra, in herbosis, 43º22′405″N,<br />

28º27′928″E, alt. circa 40 m, 8 VI 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.765, iii) [BUC].<br />

Anchusa sp. - Bălgarevo E, Cap Caliacra, in<br />

herbosis, 43º22′982″N, 28º26′459″E, alt. circa 72<br />

m, 12 IV 2008, G. Negrean (10.234) [BUC].<br />

Bromus sterilis L. subsp. elegans - Sofija S,<br />

prope Hotel Vitosha, 22 VI 2006, G. Negrean<br />

(7317) [BUC].<br />

Echium italicum L. subsp. pyramidatum (DC.) . -<br />

Bălgarevo SE, Cap Caliacra, 43º23′02.13″N,<br />

28º26′53.26″E, alt. circa 70 m, 10 VIII 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (11.482, i) [BUC].<br />

Clematis vitalba L.- Yailata, prope littore Mare<br />

Nigrum, in abruptis, 43º26′552″N, 28º32′930″E, alt.<br />

circa 25 m, 10 V 2008, G. Negrean (10.777, i)<br />

[BUC]. Bălgarevo E, inter Cap Caliacra et Bolata<br />

Dere, prope littore Mare Nigrum, in herbosis,<br />

43º22′405-23′144″N, 28º27′928-965″E, alt. circa 50<br />

m, 11 V 2008, G. Negrean (10.506) [BUC]. Ecrene<br />

N, ad oram rivuli Batova, in arenosis,<br />

43º21′10.43″N, 28º04′31.74″E, alt. circa 2 m, 3 VI<br />

2006, G. Negrean (7238) [BUC].<br />

Puccinia sii-falcariae J. Schröt., matrix:<br />

Falcaria vulgaris Bernh. - Duranculac E, ad<br />

littore Mare Nigrum, in locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis,<br />

43º41′908″N, 28º34′300″E, alt. circa 5 m, 6 VI<br />

2008, G. Negrean (10.597) [BUC]. Shabla E, ad<br />

littore Mare Nigrum, in locis herbosis,<br />

43º24′954″N, 28º30′061″E, alt. circa 10 m, 9 V<br />

2008, G. Negrean (10.441) [BUC]. Cavarna E, in<br />

herbosis, 12 IV 2008, G. Negrean (10.256) [BUC].<br />

Bălgarevo E, inter Cap Caliacra et Bolata Dere,<br />

prope littore Mare Nigrum, in herbosis, 43º22′405-<br />

23′144″N, 28º27′928-965″E, alt. circa 30 m, 11 V<br />

2008, G. Negrean (10.497) [BUC]. Bălgarevo E,<br />

Cap Caliacra N, Bolata-Dere, in herbosis, 6 VI<br />

2006, G. Negrean (7396) [BUC].<br />

11<br />

Puccinia tanaceti DC., matrix:<br />

Artemisia absinthium L. - Duranculac E, ad littore<br />

Mare Nigrum, in locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º41′908″N,<br />

28º34′300″E, alt. circa 5 m, 6 VI 2008, G. Negrean<br />

(10.594) [BUC]. Cavarna SW, Caliacria, in locis<br />

ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º25′03.47″N, 28º16′48.25″E, alt. circa<br />

46 m, 23 X 2008, G. Negrean (11.520) [BUC].<br />

Tranzschelia pruni-spinosae (Pers.) Dietel –<br />

(ii), iii, matrix:<br />

Prunus cerasifera Ehrh. - Duranculac NE, ad<br />

confines Bulgariae, 43º44′10.05″N, 28º33′24.68″E,<br />

alt. circa 27 m, 23 X 2008, G. Negrean (11.559)<br />

[BUC; SOM].<br />

Uromyces dianthi (Pers.: Pers.) Niessl, matrix:<br />

Dianthus leptopetalus Willd. - Bălgarevo E,<br />

sinistra vallis Bolata Dere, prope littore Mare<br />

Nigrum, in herbosis, 43º23′140″N, 28º28′000″E,<br />

alt. circa 35 m, 20 VII 2008, G. Negrean (11.476)<br />

[BUC].<br />

Petrorhagia prolifera (L.) P. W. Ball &<br />

Heywood - Bălgarevo E, Cap Caliacra, in herbosis,<br />

4 VI 2006, G. Negrean (7256) [BUC].<br />

Uromyces limonii (DC.) Lév., matrix:<br />

Limonium latifolium (Sm.) Kuntze - Yailata, ad<br />

littore Mare Nigrum, 43º26′131″N, 28º32′665″E,<br />

alt. circa 12 m, 19 VII 2008, G. Negrean (11.444)<br />

[BUC].<br />

Limonium meyeri (Boiss.) Kuntze - Rusalca, sub<br />

platou, prope littore Mare Nigrum, in saxosis,<br />

43º25′116″N, 28º31′126″E, alt. circa 10 m, 7 VI<br />

2008, G. Negrean (10.690) [BUC]. Rusalca, sub<br />

platou, prope littore Mare Nigrum, in saxosis,<br />

43º25′02.83″N, 28º31′00.18″E, alt. circa 10 m, 19<br />

VII 2008, G. Negrean (11.434) [BUC].<br />

Uromyces lineolatus (Desm.) Schroet., matrix:<br />

Scirpus maritimus L. subsp. maritimus - Shabla<br />

NE, ad littore Mare Nigrum, in arenosis,<br />

43º24′954″N, 28º30′061″E, alt. circa 4 m, 20 VII<br />

2008, G. Negrean (11.578) [BUC].<br />

Uromyce punctatus J. Schröt., matrix:<br />

Astragalus cornutus Pallas - Bălgarevo E, <strong>de</strong>xtra<br />

vallis Bolata Dere, prope littore Mare Nigrum, in<br />

herbosis, 43º23′140″N, 28º28′000″E, alt. circa 35<br />

m, 20 VII 2008, G. Negrean (11.449) [BUC].<br />

Uromyces rumicis (Schumach.) G. Winter,<br />

matrix:<br />

Rumex patientia L. s. l. - Camen Briag, centrum,<br />

in locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º27′20.83″N, 28º33′04.63″E,


Limitative mycotic factors from some plants.../ Ovidius University Annals of Biology-Ecology 14: 3-15 (2010)<br />

alt. circa 35 m, 23 X 2008, G. Negrean (11.530)<br />

[BUC].<br />

Uromyces scutellatus (Pers.: Pers.) Lév.,<br />

matrix:<br />

Euphorbia agraria Bieb. - Crapetz, ut f<strong>ale</strong>za, in<br />

herbosis, 12 IV 2008, G. Negrean (10.288) [BUC].<br />

Euphorbia dobrogensis Prodan - Duranculac E,<br />

ad littore Mare Nigrum, in herbosis, 43º41′908″N,<br />

28º34′300″E, alt. circa 5 m, 9 V 2008, G. Negrean<br />

(11.113) [BUC].<br />

Euphorbia nicaeensis All. s.l. - Duranculac E, ad<br />

littore Mare Nigrum, in herbosis et petrosis,<br />

43º41′908″N, 28º34′300″E, alt. circa 5 m, 6 VI<br />

2008, G. Negrean (10.599) [BUC].<br />

Euphorbia seguieriana Necker - Sofija S, prope<br />

Hotel Vitosha, 22 VI 2006, G. Negrean (7320).<br />

Uromyces trifolii-repentis Liro, matrix:<br />

Trifolium hybridum L. subsp. elegans (Savi)<br />

Aschers. & Graebn., Sofija S, Hortus Botanicus, in<br />

herbosis, 20 VI 2006, G. Negrean (7310) [BUC].<br />

USTOMYCETES<br />

Entyloma c<strong>ale</strong>ndulae (Ou<strong>de</strong>m.) <strong>de</strong> Bary,<br />

matrix:<br />

C<strong>ale</strong>ndula officinalis L., Sofija S, cult., 22 VI<br />

2006, G. Negrean (7320).<br />

Microbotryum violaceoverrucosum<br />

(Bran<strong>de</strong>nb. & Schwinn) Vánky, matrix:<br />

Silene bupleuroi<strong>de</strong>s Sm. s. l. - Yailata, platou<br />

prope littore Mare Nigrum, in saxosis,<br />

43º26′552″N, 28º32′930″E, alt. circa 25 m, 8 VIII<br />

2008, G. Negrean (11.470) [BUC].<br />

Microbotryum violaceum (Pers.: Pers.) G.<br />

Deml & Oberw. s. l., matrix:<br />

Silene latifolia Poiret subsp. alba (Miller) Greuter<br />

& Bur<strong>de</strong>t - Shabla E, ad littore Mare Nigrum, in<br />

locis herbosis, 43º24′954″N, 28º30′061″E, alt. circa<br />

10 m, 9 V 2008, G. Negrean (11.116) [BUC; CL].<br />

Camen Brjag, centrum, in cortis, 43º27′20.83″N,<br />

28º33′04.63″E, alt. circa 35 m, 23 X 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (11.538) [BUC; CL].<br />

Sorosporium saponariae F. Rudolphi, matrix:<br />

Silene bupleuroi<strong>de</strong>s Sm. s. l. - Yailata, platou<br />

prope littore Mare Nigrum, in saxosis,<br />

43º26′552″N, 28º32′930″E, alt. circa 25 m, 8 VIII<br />

2008, G. Negrean (11.471) [BUC].<br />

Ustilago cynodontis (Pass.) P. Henn., matrix:<br />

12<br />

Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. - Shabla NE, ad littore<br />

Mare Nigrum, in arenosis, 43º24′954N,<br />

28º30′061″E, alt. circa 4 m, 20 VII 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (11.584) [BUC]. Rusalca, sub platou prope<br />

littore Mare Nigrum, in Paliuretum, 43º25′116″N,<br />

28º31′126″E, alt. circa 10 m, 19 VII 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (11.417) [BUC]. Bălgarevo E, <strong>de</strong>xtra<br />

vallis Bolata Dere, in herbosis, 43º23′144″N,<br />

28º27′965″E, alt. circa 34 m, 6 VI 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.782) [BUC].<br />

Ustilago ornithogali (J. C. Schmidt & Kunze)<br />

J. G. Kühn, matrix:<br />

Gagea pusilla (F. W. Schmidt) Schult. & Schult.<br />

fil. - Cavarna E, in herbosis, 43º24′25.14″N,<br />

28º22′19.22″E, alt. circa 60 m, 12 IV 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (11.444) [BUC].<br />

Ustilago vaillantii L.-R. Tul. & C. Tul., matrix:<br />

Scilla bithynica Boiss. - Ecrene N, ad oram rivuli<br />

Batova, in Alnetum, Fraxinetum pallisiae et<br />

Salicetum, in locis humidis, 43º20′55.58″N,<br />

28º04′06.51″E, alt. circa 2 m, 13 IV 2006, G.<br />

Negrean (7056) [BUC; CL].<br />

AGARICALES, POLYPORALES, GASTEROMYCETALES<br />

Dendrothele acerina (Pers.: Fr.) P. A. Lemke,<br />

matrix:<br />

Acer campestre L. - Rusalca, sub platou, prope<br />

littore Mare Nigrum, in silvis, 43º25′140″N,<br />

28º31′120″E, alt. circa 15 m, 7 VI 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.700) [BUC].<br />

Fomitopsis pinicola (Sw.) P. Karst., matrix:<br />

Picea abies (L.) Karsten subsp. abies - Montes<br />

Vitosha, 23 VI 2006, G. Negrean (7824) [BUC].<br />

Hymenochaete rubiginosa (Dicks.) Lév.,<br />

matrix:<br />

Quercus robur L. - Sofija, Hotel Vitosha N, Hotel<br />

Moskva W, park, 24 VI 2006, G. Negrean (7389c)<br />

[BUC].<br />

Lepista panaeolus (Fr.) P. Karsten - ad solum,<br />

Dobrogea, Cavarna SW, Bojorets S, Caliac-<br />

ria, in locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º25′03.47″N, 28º16′48.25″E,<br />

alt. circa 46 m, 23 X 2008, G. Negrean (12.077).<br />

Polyporus melanopus (Pers.) Fr., matrix: in<br />

lignos, distr. Shumen: Shumen W, Platous Shumen,<br />

in Fagetum, 43º14′55.96″N, 26º53′45.52″E,<br />

alt. circa 474 m, 18 VII 2008, G. Negrean (11.604)<br />

[BUC].


Gavril Negrean/ Ovidius University Annals of Biology-Ecology 14: 3-15 (2010)<br />

Polyporus varius Pers.: Fr., matrix: ad ramulos<br />

<strong>de</strong>cidous, distr. Shumen: Shumen, park,<br />

43º16′12.73″N, 26º560′30.79″E, alt. circa 205 m,<br />

18 VI 2008, G. Negrean (11.586) [BUC].<br />

Suillus bellinii (Inzenga) Watling, ad solum,<br />

sub Pinus nigra Arnold, cult., Dobrogea, Cavarna<br />

SW, Bojorets S, Caliacria, in abruptis et petrosis,<br />

43º25′03.47″N, 28º16′48.25″E, alt. circa 46 m, 22<br />

X 2008, G. Negrean (11.592) [BUC; CL].<br />

Trametes hirsuta (Wulfen) Pilát, matrix: in<br />

lignos, distr. Shumen: Shumen W, Platous<br />

Shumen, in Fagetum, 43º14′55.96″N,<br />

26º53′45.52″E, alt. circa 474 m, 18 VII 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (11.605) [BUC].<br />

Tulostoma brum<strong>ale</strong> Pers.: Pers., ad solum,<br />

Duranculac E, ad littore Mare Nigrum, in arenosis<br />

maritimis, 43º40′296″N, 28º33′918″E, alt. circa 5<br />

m, 9 V 2008, comm. P. Anastasiu, <strong>de</strong>t. G. Negrean<br />

& P. Anastasiu (10.426) [BUC].<br />

Tulostoma squamosum Pers. - Ecrene N, ad<br />

oram rivuli Batova, in arenosis, 43º21′10.43″N,<br />

28º04′31.74″E, alt. circa 2 m, 13 IV 2006, G.<br />

Negrean (7054) [BUC].<br />

Volvariella gloiocephala (DC.: Fr.) Boekhout<br />

& En<strong>de</strong>rle - ad solum, Dobrogea, Cavarna SW,<br />

Bojorets S, Caliacria, in locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis,<br />

43º25′03.47″N, 28º16′48.25″E, alt. circa 46 m, 23<br />

X 2008, G. Negrean (12.075).<br />

FUNGI ANAMORPHICI<br />

Ampelomyces quisqualis Ces.,<br />

socio cum: Erysiphe cruciferarum Opiz ex<br />

L. Junell - matrix:<br />

Alyssum hirsutum Bieb. - Duranculac E, ad littore<br />

Mare Nigrum, in locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º41′908″N,<br />

28º34′300″E, alt. circa 5 m, 11 IV 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.283) [BUC].<br />

Socio cum: Erysiphe cynoglossi (Wallr.) U. Braun,<br />

matrix:<br />

Echium italicum L. subsp. pyramidatum (DC.) . -<br />

Bălgarevo SE, Cap Caliacra, in herbosis,<br />

43º23′02.13″N, 28º26′53.26″E, alt. circa 70 m, 10<br />

VIII 2008, G. Negrean (11.481) [BUC].<br />

Cercospora plumbaginea Sacc. & D. Sacc.,<br />

matrix:<br />

Plumbago europaea L. - Cavarna S, prope hotel,<br />

in locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º21′17.41″N, 28º21′17.41″E,<br />

13<br />

alt. circa 30 m, 10 VIII 2008, G. Negrean (11.487)<br />

[BUC].<br />

Cercospora taurica Tranzsch., matrix:<br />

Heliotropium europaeum L. - Camen Briag,<br />

centrum, in locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º27′20.83″N,<br />

28º33′04.63″E, alt. circa 35 m, 23 X 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (11.591) [BUC; CL ]. Cavarna SW,<br />

Bojorets S, Caliacria, in locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis,<br />

43º25′03.47″N, 28º16′48.25″E, alt. circa 46 m, 22<br />

X 2008, G. Negrean (11.529) [BUC].<br />

Napicladium celtidis Cavara, matrix:<br />

Celtis australis L. - Cavarna S, prope hotel, in<br />

locis ru<strong>de</strong>ralis, 43º21′17.41″N, 28º21′17.41″E, alt.<br />

circa 30 m, 10 VIII 2008, G. Negrean (11.489)<br />

[BUC].<br />

Ovularia obliqua (Cooke) Ou<strong>de</strong>m., matrix:<br />

Rumex patientia L. s. l. - Duranculac E, ad littore<br />

Mare Nigrum, locis ru<strong>de</strong>ratis, 43º41′908″N,<br />

28º34′300″E, alt. circa 5 m, 11 IV 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.218) [BUC].<br />

Ramularia arvensis Sacc., matrix:<br />

Potentilla recta L., Sofija S, prope Hotel Vitosha,<br />

20 VI 2006, G. Negrean (7309) [BUC].<br />

Ramularia beticola Fautrey & Lambotte,<br />

matrix:<br />

Beta trigyna Waldst. & Kit. - Rusalca, sub platou<br />

prope littore Mare Nigrum, 43º24′750″N,<br />

28º29′790″E, alt. circa 15 m, 10 V 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.464) [BUC].<br />

Ramularia centaureae Lindr., matrix:<br />

Centaurea salonitana Vis. - Bălgarevo E, Cap<br />

Caliacra, in herbosis, 43º22′982″N, 28º26′459″E,<br />

alt. circa 72 m, 8 VI 2008, G. Negrean (10.754)<br />

[BUC].<br />

Ramularia libanotidis Bubák, matrix:<br />

Seseli campestre Besser - Rusalca, sub platou,<br />

prope littore Mare Nigrum, 43º25′116″N,<br />

28º31′126″E, alt. circa 10 m, 7 VI 2008, G.<br />

Negrean (10.693) [BUC].<br />

Ramularia ranunculi-oxyspermi Lobik,<br />

matrix:<br />

Ranunculus oxyspermus Bieb. - Cavarna E, in<br />

herbosis, 43º24′25.14″N, 28º22′19.22″E, alt. circa<br />

60 m, 12 IV 2008, G. Negrean (10.262) [BUC].<br />

5. References<br />

[1] NEGREAN Gavril, CONSTANTINESCU<br />

Ovidiu & DENCHEV Cvetomir M. 2004.


Limitative mycotic factors from some plants.../ Ovidius University Annals of Biology-Ecology 14: 3-15 (2010)<br />

Addition to the Peronospr<strong>ale</strong>s of Bulgaria.<br />

Mycologia Balcanica 1(1): 69-72.<br />

[2] NEGREAN Gavril & DENCHEV Cvetomir M.<br />

2000. New record of Bulgarian parasitic fungi.<br />

Flora Mediterranea (P<strong>ale</strong>rmo) 10: 101-108.<br />

[3] NEGREAN Gavril & DENCHEV Cvetomir M.<br />

2002. New record of fungi from bulgarian<br />

Dobrudzha. Pp. 21-24. In: N. RANDJELOVIĆ<br />

(ed.), Proceedings of Sixth Symposium on Flora<br />

of Southeastern Serbia and Adjacent Territories,<br />

July 4-7, 2000, Sokobanja, Yugoslavia. Vuk<br />

Karadžić, Niš.<br />

[4] NEGREAN Gavril & DENCHEV Cvetomir M.<br />

2004. Addition to the Erysiph<strong>ale</strong>s of Bulgaria.<br />

Mycologia Balcanica 1(1): 63-66.<br />

[5] BRAUN Uwe. 1987. A monograph of the<br />

Erysiph<strong>ale</strong>s (pow<strong>de</strong>ry mil<strong>de</strong>ws). Beih. Nova<br />

Hedw. Heft 89. Berlin, Stuttgart: J. Cramer, 700<br />

pp., 316 fig.<br />

[6] BRAUN Uwe. 1995. The pow<strong>de</strong>ry mil<strong>de</strong>ws<br />

(Erysiph<strong>ale</strong>s) of Europe. Jena: Gustav Fischer<br />

Verlag, i-iv, 1-337 pp., ill. 112, ISBN 3-334-<br />

60994-4 (HB).<br />

[7] DENCHEV Cvetomir M. 1995. Bulgarian<br />

Uredin<strong>ale</strong>s. Mycotaxon 55: 405-465.<br />

[8] FAKIROVA Violeta Ilieva ● ФАКИРОВА<br />

Виолета Илиева. 1991. Fungi Bulgaricae 1<br />

tomus ordo Erysiph<strong>ale</strong>s ● Гъбите в България 1<br />

том разред Еrysiph<strong>ale</strong>s, red. princip. prof. Dr. I.<br />

Kovachevsky; edit. Simeon Vanev, Edit. Acad.<br />

Bulgaricae, Sofija, 154 pp.<br />

[9] MAJEWSKI T. 1977. Grzyby (Mycota), T. IX,<br />

Podstawczaki (Basidiomycetes), Rdzawniko we<br />

(Uredin<strong>ale</strong>s) I, Flora Polska, Warsawa - Kraków:<br />

Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. 396 pp.<br />

[10] MAJEWSKI T. 1979. Grzyby (Mycota), T. XI,<br />

Podstawczaki (Basidiomycetes), Rdzawnikowe<br />

(Uredin<strong>ale</strong>s) II, Flora Polska, Warsawa -<br />

Kraków: Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.<br />

463 pp. + Erata + 2 Pl.<br />

[11] SĂVULESCU T. 1953. Monografia<br />

Uredin<strong>ale</strong>lor din Republica Populară Română ●<br />

Monographia Uredinalium Reipublicae<br />

Popularis Romanicae, vol. 1-2. Bucureşti: Edit.<br />

Aca<strong>de</strong>miei Române, 1166 pp. (vol. 1: 1-332 + ixxiv<br />

+ liii Pl. + 21 Tab.; vol. 2: 333-1168. /B:<br />

339-343/.<br />

[12] SĂVULESCU T. 1957. Ustilagin<strong>ale</strong>le din<br />

Republica Populară Romînă ● Ustilagin<strong>ale</strong>s<br />

14<br />

Reipublicae Popularis Romanicae, vol. 1-2.<br />

Bucureşti: Edit. Aca<strong>de</strong>miei Romîne, 1168 pp.<br />

/vol. I: 1-545 pp; vol. II: 546-1170 pp., in<strong>de</strong>x:<br />

1141-1168/.<br />

[13] SCHOLLER M. 1996. Die Erysiph<strong>ale</strong>s,<br />

Puccini<strong>ale</strong>s und Ustilagin<strong>ale</strong>s <strong>de</strong>r Vorpommerschen<br />

Bod<strong>de</strong>nlandschaft - Ökologisch-floristiche,<br />

florengeschichtliche und morphologisch-taxonomische<br />

Untersuchungen. Regensb. Mykol. Schriften<br />

6: 1-325.<br />

[14] VANEV Simeon Georgiev, DIMITROVA<br />

Evtimia Georgieva & ILIEVA Elena Ivanova ●<br />

ВАНЕВ Симеон Георгиев, ДИМИТРОВА<br />

Евтимия Георгиева & ИЛИЕВА Елена<br />

Иванова. 1993. Fungi Bulgaricae 2 tomus ordo<br />

Peronospor<strong>ale</strong>s ● Гъбите в България 2 Tом<br />

разред Peronospor<strong>ale</strong>s. Red. principali Prof. Dr.<br />

Ivan KOVACHEVSKI, Editit tomum, Violeta<br />

FAKI-ROVA. Sofija: Edit. Aca<strong>de</strong>miae<br />

Scientiarum Bulgaricae, 195 pp. + Erata, 1 fig., 1<br />

tab., 57 pl. ISBN 954-430-227-1 (t. 2).<br />

[15] SĂVULESCU T. (ed.). 1952-1976. Flora<br />

României ● Flora Romaniae. Bucureşti: Edit.<br />

Aca<strong>de</strong>miei Române. Vol. 1-13.<br />

[16] TUTIN T. G., BURGES N. A., CHATER A.<br />

O., EDMONDSON J. R., HEYWOOD V. H.,<br />

MOORE D. M., VALENTINE D. H., WALTERS<br />

S. M. & WEBB D. A. (eds, assist. by<br />

J. R. AKEROYD & M. E. NEWTON;<br />

appendices ed. by R. R. MILL). 1993. Flora<br />

Europaea. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Psilotaceae to<br />

Platanaceae. Cambridge: Cambridge University<br />

Press xlvi, 581 pp., illus. ISBN 0-521-41007-X<br />

(HB).<br />

[17] TUTIN T. G., HEYWOOD V. H., BURGES<br />

N. A., MOORE D. M., VALENTINE D. H.,<br />

WALTERS S. M. & WEBB D. A. (eds). 1964-<br />

1980. Flora Europaea. Vols. 1-5. Cambridge:<br />

Cambridge University Press.<br />

[18] HOLMGREN Patricia K. & HOLMGREN<br />

Noel H. (ed.). 1992. Plant specialists in<strong>de</strong>x: In<strong>de</strong>x<br />

to specialists in the systematics of plants and<br />

fungi based on data from In<strong>de</strong>x Herbariorum<br />

(Herbaria), edition 8. Königstein: Koeltz<br />

Scientific Books, 1-394. [Regnum Vegetabile<br />

120], ISBN 3-87429-331-9 (HB).<br />

[19] NEGREAN G. 1992. Violeta Ilieva Fakirova,<br />

Fungi Bulgaricae 1 tomus ordo Erysiph<strong>ale</strong>s, red.


Gavril Negrean/ Ovidius University Annals of Biology-Ecology 14: 3-15 (2010)<br />

princip. prof. Dr. I. Kovachevsky; edit. Simeon<br />

Vanev, Edit. Acad. Bulgaricae, Sofija, 1991, 154<br />

pp.etc. Stud. Cerc. Biol., Ser. Biol. Veg. 44(2):<br />

196-197. /recenzie critică/.<br />

15<br />

Aknowledgments<br />

We thanks Mrs. Professor Paulina Anastasiu<br />

for the help given in or<strong>de</strong>r to draw this material and<br />

to Dr. Krahulec (Pruhonice) for confirming the<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntification of Hieracium bauhinii.


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

THE MEDICINAL PLANTS OF PROVADIISKO PLATEAU<br />

Dimcho ZAHARIEV, Desislav DIMITROV<br />

University of Shumen Bishop Konstantin Preslavski, Faculty of Nature Sciences,<br />

115 Universitetska Str., 9712, Shumen, Bulgaria,<br />

dimtchoz@yahoo.com<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: Consi<strong>de</strong>rable taxonomical diversity of the medicinal plants of Provadiisko Plateau is established: 376<br />

species of vascular plants from 261 genera and 86 families. Most families (77.91%) and genera (98.85%) are<br />

represented in small numbers – 1 to 4. The analysis of their life form indicates that the geophytes dominante,<br />

followed by the groups of the phanerophytes and the hemi cryptophytes. These biological types are represented<br />

mainly by perennial herbaceous plants (53.19%) and annual herbaceous plants (12.77%). The largest percentage<br />

species are of the circumboreal type (36.17%). Among the medicinal plants, there are 4 en<strong>de</strong>mites and 29 relicts.<br />

39 species with protection statute are <strong>de</strong>scribed. The anthropophytes among the medicinal plants are 236 species<br />

(62.77%).<br />

Keywords: Provadiisko Plateau, medicinal plants, analysis of medicinal plants, protected species.<br />

______________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

In physiographic terms the Provadiisko Plateau<br />

belongs to the Danube hilly plain area, i.e. the<br />

Ludogorsko-Provadiiska subarea [1]. The Northern<br />

plateau bor<strong>de</strong>r is the Provadiiska River; in the East it<br />

reaches to the Devnya Valley; in the South, the<br />

Provadiisko Plateau is separated from Roiaksko<br />

Plateau by Glavnica River; and finally, west of the<br />

Provaddisko Plateau is the Shumensko Plateau. The<br />

average altitu<strong>de</strong> is 250 m. above sea level. The<br />

highest point is Sakartepe in the western parts of the<br />

plateau with its height of 389 m. The plateau is<br />

located in the Transcontinental climate region, district<br />

Dobrudjansko Plateau [2]. Winds are coming mostly<br />

from the North and Northeast. The average annual<br />

temperature is around 12°С. The average monthly<br />

temperatures are always positive. The temperature in<br />

January is the lowest (1.2°С) and in July – the highest<br />

(22.6°С). The minimum temperature rarely fall to<br />

18°С, and the average maximum temperature reaches<br />

27°С. The maximum rainfalls are in May and June<br />

and the minimum – in March and September. The<br />

annual amount of rainfalls is around 530 mm.<br />

Average humidity is around 76-77%; lowest in the<br />

summer (70%) and highest in the winter (82%) [3].<br />

The soils, according to the FAO classification, are<br />

two types. The first type is calcic chernozems located<br />

on the slopes and in the areas with low slope. The<br />

second type is calvaric fluvisols located in the<br />

Provadiiska Valley [4].<br />

In terms of its flora, the plateau belongs to the<br />

region of Northeastern Bulgaria. The vegetation<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>s: forests of Carpinus betulus L. and Quercus<br />

cerris L., partly with Carpinus orientalis Mill.; mixed<br />

forests of Carpinus betulus L. and Quercus cerris L.,<br />

partly with Quercus d<strong>ale</strong>champii Ten., Acer<br />

campestre L., etc.; mixed forests of Tilia tomentosa<br />

Moench., with Carpinus betulus L. or Quercus cerris<br />

L., partly also with Quercus d<strong>ale</strong>champii Ten., Acer<br />

campestre L., etc.; forest and shrubs of Carpineta<br />

orientalis; mixed forests of Quercus cerris L.,<br />

Quercus pubescens Willd. and Cotinus coggygria<br />

Scop., partly with a secondary prev<strong>ale</strong>nce of Cotinus<br />

coggygria Scop.; mixed forests of Fraxinus ornus L.<br />

and Carpinus orientalis Mill., partly of secondary<br />

origin; shrubs with prev<strong>ale</strong>nce of Paliureta spinachristi,<br />

combined with xerothermal frass communities<br />

mostly replacing xerothermal forest communities of<br />

Quercus cerris L. and Quercus frainetto Ten.; shrub<br />

and grass steppe and xerothermal communities;<br />

xerothermal grass communities with a prev<strong>ale</strong>nce of<br />

Dichantieta ischaemi, Poaeta bulbosae, Poaeta<br />

concinnae, Chrysopogoneta grylli and Ephemereta;<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


The medicinal plants of the Provadiisko Plateau / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 17-23 (2010)<br />

mesoxerothermal grass vegetation with a prev<strong>ale</strong>nce<br />

of Poa bulbosa L., Loium perenne L., Cynodon<br />

dactylon (L.) Pers., partly also Dichantium<br />

ischaemum (L.) Roberty and rarely Chrysopogon<br />

gryllus (L.) Trin., mostly in the village com<br />

monlands; mesophytous grass communities<br />

(meadows), replacing forests of Ulmus minor Mill.,<br />

Fraxinus oxicarpa Willd., Quercus robur L.,<br />

Quercus pedunculiflora C. Koch.; farm areas,<br />

replacing forests of Fagus sylvatica ssp. moesiaca<br />

(K. Maly) Hyelmq.; farm areas, replacing forests of<br />

Quercus d<strong>ale</strong>champii Ten.; farm areas, replacing<br />

forests of Ulmus minor Mill., Fraxinus oxicarpa<br />

Willd., Quercus pedunculiflora C. Koch. [5].<br />

The first studies of the flora of the plateau have<br />

been conducted in the 1990s by Vasil Kovachev<br />

around Madara, Kaspitchan and Provadia [6]. The<br />

results are found in the first volume on Bulgarian<br />

flora [7] and its supplement [8]. Hermengild Shkorpil<br />

also conducted botanical researchin the vicinity of<br />

Provadia in the early twentieth century [6].<br />

So far, data on the medicinal plants in the area of<br />

Provadiisko Plateau have been published by authors<br />

for the the territory of Municipality Provadia [9] and<br />

by Zahariev and Uzunov for the protected area<br />

Madarski rock wreaths [10].<br />

The Provadiisko Plateau is a part of the protected<br />

zone Provadiisko-Roiaksko Plateau by Natura 2000,<br />

according to Council Directive 92/43/EEC of the<br />

European Community to protect natural habitats and<br />

of wild fauna and flora [11].<br />

2. Material and Methods<br />

The field studies were conducted on the route<br />

method in 2007-2009. The names of the taxons are<br />

taken from the Flora of PR Bulgaria, Vol. І – Х [12].<br />

The update of the taxons is consistent with APG II<br />

[13]. The life forms are presented by Raunkier [14].<br />

In their <strong>de</strong>termination was used Flora of PR Bulgaria,<br />

Vol. І – Х [12]. The biological types are presented by<br />

Kozuharov [15]. The floristic elements and en<strong>de</strong>mites<br />

are presented by Asiov et all. [16]. The relicts are<br />

presented by Gruev and Kuzmanov [17], Peev [18],<br />

Boža et all. [19], Peev et all. [20]. The protection<br />

status is presented using the following documents:<br />

Council Directive 92/43/EEC of the European<br />

18<br />

Community to protect natural habitats and of wild<br />

fauna and flora [11], Convention on<br />

International Tra<strong>de</strong> in Endangered Species of Wild<br />

Fauna and Flora (CITES) [21], Red book of PR<br />

Bulgaria [22], IUCN Red List for Bulgaria [23],<br />

Biological Diversity Act [24], Or<strong>de</strong>r for special<br />

arrangements for the conservation and use of<br />

medicinal plants [25]. The anthropophytes are<br />

presented by Stefanov and Kitanov [26].<br />

3. Results and Discussions<br />

As a result of the research of the medicinal plants<br />

of the Provadiisko Plateau 376 species of vascular<br />

plants from 261 genera and 86 families have been<br />

in<strong>de</strong>tified. They represent 9.83% from all species,<br />

29.36% from all genera and 50.89% from all plant<br />

families in Bulgaria.<br />

Most families (77.91%) and genera (98.85%) are<br />

represented in small numbers: 1 to 4.<br />

Almost all families (86.05%) are represented<br />

with 1-4 genera. Only 13.95% from the families<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>d 5 or more genera (Table 1). Most genera are<br />

found in the families: Asteraceae (28), Lamiaceae<br />

(22), Fabaceae (21), Rosaceae (15), Apiaceae (14)<br />

and Brassicaceae (12).<br />

Table 1. Families with greatest number of genera<br />

Families Genera<br />

Asteraceae 28<br />

Lamiaceae 22<br />

Fabaceae 21<br />

Rosaceae 15<br />

Apiaceae 14<br />

Brassicaceae 12<br />

Scrophulariaceae 8<br />

Ranunculaceae 8<br />

Caryophyllaceae 8<br />

Boraginaceae 7<br />

Poaceae 5<br />

Solanaceae 5<br />

Most families – 77.91% have 1-4 species. Only<br />

22.09% of the families are represented by 5 or more<br />

species (Table 2). Most species belong to the<br />

following families: Asteraceae (42), Lamiaceae (41),


Dimcho Zahariev, Desislav Dimitrov / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 17-23 (2010)<br />

Fabaceae (28), Rosaceae (26), Brassicaceae (15),<br />

Apiaceae (15), Ranunculaceae (12) and<br />

Scrophulariaceae (11).<br />

Almost all genera (98.85%) are represented by 1-<br />

4 species. Most species – more than 5 have only<br />

1.15% of the genera (Table 3): Centaurea, Geranium<br />

and Thymus.<br />

Table 2. Families with greatest number of species<br />

Families Species<br />

Asteraceae 42<br />

Lamiaceae 41<br />

Fabaceae 28<br />

Rosaceae 26<br />

Brassicaceae 15<br />

Apiaceae 15<br />

Ranunculaceae 12<br />

Scrophulariaceae 11<br />

Boraginaceae 9<br />

Caryophyllaceae 9<br />

Orchidaceae 7<br />

Geraniaceae 6<br />

Polygonaceae 6<br />

Solanaceae 6<br />

Aspleniaceae 5<br />

Oleaceae 5<br />

Poaceae 5<br />

Rubiaceae 5<br />

Salicaceae 5<br />

Table 3. Genera with greatest number of species<br />

Families Genera Species<br />

Asteraceae Centaurea 5<br />

Geraniaceae Geranium 5<br />

Lamiaceae Thymus 5<br />

In the analysis of the life forms were obtained the<br />

following results (Table 4): The phanerophytes (Ph)<br />

are represented by 86 species. The megaphanerophytes<br />

are represented by 10 species, the most<br />

common of which are: Acer pseudoplatanus L.,<br />

Fraxinus excelsior L., Gleditsia triacanthos L., Pinus<br />

sylvestris L., Quercus frainetto Ten., Quercus robur<br />

L.<br />

19<br />

The mezophanerophytes are 35 species, of which<br />

essential are: Acer campestre L., Acer<br />

pseudoplatanus L., Carpinus betulus L., Fagus<br />

sylvatica L., Fraxinus ornus L., Tilia tomentosa<br />

Moench, Ulmus minor Mill.<br />

The microphanerophytes are 27 species, the most<br />

common of which are: Acer tataricum L., Cornus<br />

mas L., Corylus avellana L., Cotinus coggygria<br />

Scop., Crataegus monogyna Jacq., He<strong>de</strong>ra helix L.,<br />

Ligustrum vulgare L., Paliurus spina-christi Mill.,<br />

Prunus spinosa L., Rosa canina L., Rubus caesius L.,<br />

Sambucus nigra L.<br />

The nanophanerophytes are 11 species, which<br />

are essential: Clematis vitalba L., Genista tinctoria<br />

L., Teucrium chamaedrys L., Teucrium polium L.<br />

The succulents are represented by 3 species:<br />

Sedum acre L., Sedum album L. and Sedum<br />

maximum (L.) Suter.<br />

Table 4. Life forms<br />

Group Subgroup Species<br />

Megaphanerophytes 10<br />

Mezophanerophytes 35<br />

Phanerophytes Microphanerophytes 27<br />

(Ph) Nanophanerophytes 11<br />

Epiphytes –<br />

Succulents 3<br />

Hamephytes (Ch) 5<br />

Hemi cryptophytes (H) 65<br />

Therophyte – hemi cryptophytes 45<br />

(Th-H)<br />

Cryptophytes Geophytes 126<br />

(Cr)<br />

Helophytes 1<br />

Hydrophytes –<br />

Therophytes (Th) 48<br />

The group of hamephytes (Ch) inclu<strong>de</strong>s 5<br />

species: Dictamnus albus L., Ruscus aculeatus L.,<br />

Satureia montana L., Thymus jankae Čelak., Thymus<br />

zygioi<strong>de</strong>s Griseb.<br />

The hemi cryptophytes (H) are 65 species, of<br />

which most common are: Agrimonia eupatoria L.,<br />

Carlina vulgaris L., Cichorium intybus L.,<br />

Clinopodium vulgare L., Echium vulgare L.,<br />

Eryngium campestre L., Lotus corniculatus L.,<br />

Marrubium peregrinum L., Plantago lanceolata L.,


The medicinal plants of the Provadiisko Plateau / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 17-23 (2010)<br />

Plantago media L., Polygala major Jacq.,<br />

Ranunculus ficaria L., Salvia nemorosa L., Silene<br />

vulgaris (Moench) Garcke, Taraxacum officin<strong>ale</strong><br />

Web., Trifolium pratense L., Trifolium repens L.,<br />

Verbena officinalis L., Viola odorata L.<br />

The transition group therophytes – hemi<br />

cryptophytes (Th-H) comprises 45 species, of which<br />

essential are: Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara et<br />

Gran<strong>de</strong>, Arctium lappa L., Capsella bursa-pastoris<br />

Moench., Daucus carota L., Erodium cicutarium (L.)<br />

L̀ Her., Heracleum sibiricum L., Malva sylvestris L.,<br />

Plantago major L., Stellaria media (L.) Vill.,<br />

Tordylium maximum L., Verbascum <strong>de</strong>nsiflorum<br />

Bertol., Viola tricolor L.<br />

The group of cryptophytes (Cr) is the largest and<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>s 127 species. Their significant proportion can<br />

be explained by the dominance of forest habitats<br />

within the plateau. Geophytes dominate with total of<br />

126 species; the most wi<strong>de</strong>spread of them are:<br />

Achillea millefolium L., Anemone ranunculoi<strong>de</strong>s L.,<br />

Artemisia absinthium L., Artemisia vulgaris L.,<br />

Chelidonium majus L., Convolvulus arvensis L.,<br />

Coronilla varia L., Fragaria vesca L., Galanthus<br />

elwesii Hook. fil., Galanthus nivalis L., Geum<br />

urbanum L., Isopyrum thalictroi<strong>de</strong>s L., Potentilla<br />

argentea L., Sanguisorba minor Scop., Scilla bifolia<br />

L., Urtica dioica L. The helophytes is represented by<br />

one species only: Typha latifolia L.<br />

The therophytes (Th) are 48 species. The most<br />

wi<strong>de</strong>spread are: Galium aparine L., Lactuca serriola<br />

L., Lamium purpureum L., Lolium temulentum L.,<br />

Melilotus officinalis (L.) Pall., Papaver rhoeas L.,<br />

Parietaria lusitanica L., Xeranthemum annuum L.<br />

The largest group species in terms of biological<br />

types (Figure 1) are perennial plants (p) – 200 species<br />

(53.19%). Their dominance can be explained with the<br />

wi<strong>de</strong> variety of communities and habitats within the<br />

plateau.<br />

The annual plants (a) are 48 species (12.77%),<br />

which can be explained by the presence of dry rocky<br />

terrain and arable lands on the plateau.<br />

The tree species (t) are 39 (10.37%). The next<br />

group inclu<strong>de</strong>s shrubs (sh) – 29 species (7.71%). The<br />

transition group from annual to biennial plants (a-b)<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>s 19 species (5.05%). The biennial plants (b)<br />

are 13 species (3.46%). There are species from<br />

transition group from tree to shrubs (sh-t) with 12<br />

20<br />

species (3.19%) and species from transition group<br />

from biennial to perennial plants (b-p) – 11 species<br />

(2.92%). The largest group inclu<strong>de</strong>s annual as well as<br />

perennial plants (a-p) and is represented by 5 species<br />

(1.33%).<br />

29<br />

12<br />

39<br />

200<br />

Fig. 1. Biological types<br />

The specific physiographic conditions on the<br />

Provadiisko Plateau <strong>de</strong>termined consi<strong>de</strong>rable<br />

diversity of floristic elements. 7 different types of<br />

floristic elements are established (Table 5). The<br />

dominant elements are elements from circumboreal<br />

type – 136 species (36.17%), followed by European<br />

elements – 101 species (26.86%) and Mediterranean<br />

elements – 67 species (17.82%). The en<strong>de</strong>mic<br />

component is represented by 4 species (1.06%). It<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>s 3 Balkan en<strong>de</strong>mites – Achillea clypeolata<br />

Sibth. et Sm., Aesculus hippocastanum L., Inula<br />

aschersoniana Janka and 1 Balkan suben<strong>de</strong>mite –<br />

Syringa vulgaris L.<br />

Table 5. Floristic elements<br />

Floristic elements Species<br />

Circumboreal type 136<br />

European type 101<br />

Mediterranean type 67<br />

Pontic type 27<br />

Adventive type 20<br />

Cosmopolitan type 19<br />

Balkan en<strong>de</strong>mic and<br />

suben<strong>de</strong>mic type<br />

4<br />

Other 2<br />

This distribution can be explained by the location<br />

of the plateau in the transcontinental climate region.<br />

The proximity of the plateau to the bor<strong>de</strong>r of a<br />

48<br />

19 5 13<br />

11<br />

a<br />

a-b<br />

a-p<br />

b<br />

b-p<br />

p<br />

sh<br />

sh-t<br />

t


Dimcho Zahariev, Desislav Dimitrov / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 17-23 (2010)<br />

temperate region is the reason for the prev<strong>ale</strong>nce of<br />

circumboreal and European floristic elements. At the<br />

same time, the impact of the continentalmediterranean<br />

region in terms of the Black Sea and<br />

the karst topography create conditions for the<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment of a large number of mediterranean<br />

species.<br />

The flora of the plateau inclu<strong>de</strong>s significant<br />

number of relict species: 29. They account for 7.71%<br />

of the total number of species. The majority of the<br />

relict species are Tertiary relicts. They are 28 species:<br />

Abies alba Mil., Acer campestre L., Acer<br />

pseudoplatanus L., Acer tataricum L., Aesculus<br />

hippocastanum L., Betula pendula Roth, Carpinus<br />

betulus L., Carpinus orientalis Mill., Celtis australis<br />

L., Cercis siliquastrum L., Clematis vitalba L.,<br />

Corylus avellana L., Cotinus coggygria Scop.,<br />

Fraxinus excelsior L., Fraxinus ornus L., He<strong>de</strong>ra<br />

helix L., Juniperus communis L., Picea abies (L.)<br />

Karsten, Pinus nigra Arn., Populus alba L., Populus<br />

nigra L., Ruscus aculeatus L., Salix alba L., Salix<br />

caprea L., Smilax excelsa L., Taxus baccata L.,<br />

Ulmus minor Mill., Viscum album L. One of the relict<br />

species is quaternary – Galanthus nivalis L.<br />

39 species with protection statute are <strong>de</strong>scribed.<br />

One of them – Himantoglossum caprinum (Bieb.) C.<br />

Koch., is inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the list of species, protected by<br />

the Berne Convention and Natura 2000. In CITES 10<br />

species are inclu<strong>de</strong>d: Adonis vernalis L., Anacamptis<br />

pyramidalis C. Rich., Galanthus elwesii Hook. fil.,<br />

Galanthus nivalis L., Himantoglossum caprinum<br />

(Bieb.) C. Koch., Orchis morio L., Orchis purpurea<br />

Huds., Orchis simia L., Orchis tri<strong>de</strong>ntata Scop.,<br />

Platanthera chlorantha (Cust.) Rchb. In the IUCN<br />

Red List for Bulgaria 5 species are inclu<strong>de</strong>d un<strong>de</strong>r the<br />

category „Threatened”: Aesculus hippocastanum L.,<br />

Galanthus elwesii Hook. fil., Galanthus nivalis L.,<br />

Juniperus sabina L., Taxus baccata L., 2 species are<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>d un<strong>de</strong>r the category „Vulnerable”:<br />

Anacamptis pyramidalis C. Rich., Himantoglossum<br />

caprinum (Bieb.) C. Koch, 2 species are in the<br />

category „Nearly threatened”: Anemone sylvestris L.,<br />

Cercis siliquastrum L. and 1 species is inclu<strong>de</strong>d in<br />

the category „Of least concern”: Tilia rubra DC. In<br />

the Red book for Bulgaria 4 species are inclu<strong>de</strong>d in<br />

the category „Endangered”: Aesculus hippocastanum<br />

L., Anemone sylvestris L., Galanthus nivalis L.,<br />

Taxus baccata L. and 4 species are inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the<br />

21<br />

category „Rare”: Artemisia pontica L., Cercis<br />

siliquastrum L., Juniperus sabina L., Tilia rubra DC.<br />

In the Biological Diversity Act 8 species are inclu<strong>de</strong>d<br />

in the category „Protected”: Aesculus hippocastanum<br />

L., Anacamptis pyramidalis C. Rich., Anemone<br />

sylvestris L., Galanthus elwesii Hook. fil., Galanthus<br />

nivalis L., Himantoglossum caprinum (Bieb.) C.<br />

Koch., Juniperus sabina L., Taxus baccata L. In the<br />

category “Un<strong>de</strong>r the protection and regulated use of<br />

nature” are 14 species: Asparagus officinalis L.,<br />

Crocus pallasii Bieb., Echinops sphaerocephalos L.,<br />

Gypsophila paniculata L., Helichrysum areanrium<br />

(L.) Moench., Lilium martagon L., Orchis morio L.,<br />

Orchis purpurea Huds., Orchis simia L., Orchis<br />

tri<strong>de</strong>ntata Scop., Polygonatum odoratum (Mill.)<br />

Druce, Ruscus aculeatus L., Salix caprea L., Scilla<br />

bifolia L. Collecting herbs is prohibited from the<br />

natural habitats of 15 species: Adonis vernalis L.,<br />

Althaea officinalis L., Artemisia santonicum L.,<br />

Asarum europaeum L., Asplenium trichomanes L.,<br />

Convallaria majalis L., Glaucium flavum Crantz,<br />

Helichrysum areanrium (L.) Moench., Orchis morio<br />

L., Orchis purpurea Huds., Orchis simia L., Orchis<br />

tri<strong>de</strong>ntata Scop., Phyllitis scolopendrium (L.)<br />

Newm., Ruscus aculeatus L., V<strong>ale</strong>riana officinalis L.<br />

Un<strong>de</strong>r a restrictive regime are 4 species: Berberis<br />

vulgaris L., Carlina acanthifolia All., Galium<br />

odoratum (L.) Scop., Sedum acre L.<br />

The anthropophytes among the medicinal plants<br />

are 236 species (62.77%). Many of them are<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>red weed or ru<strong>de</strong>ral plants. The most common<br />

as weed are: Anagallis arvensis L., Brassica nigra<br />

(L.) Koch, Centaurea cyanus L., Chenopodium<br />

album L., Chenopodium polyspermum L., Consolida<br />

hispanica (Costa) Greut. et Bur<strong>de</strong>t, Consolida regalis<br />

S. F. Gray, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers., Datura<br />

stramonium L., Myosotis arvensis (L.) Hill, Nigella<br />

arvensis L., Papaver rhoeas L., Senecio vulgaris L.,<br />

Stellaria media (L.) Vill., Thlaspi arvense L.,<br />

Xanthium strumarium L. Оf the ru<strong>de</strong>ral plants most<br />

common are: Capsella bursa-pastoris Moench.,<br />

Cardaria draba (L.) Desv., Chamomilla recutita (L.)<br />

Rausch., Chelidonium majus L., Conium maculatum<br />

L., Conyza cana<strong>de</strong>nsis (L.) Cronq., Heracleum<br />

sibiricum L., Lactuca serriola L., Parietaria<br />

lusitanica L., Sambucus ebulus L., Solanum<br />

dulcamara L., Urtica dioica L.


The medicinal plants of the Provadiisko Plateau / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 17-23 (2010)<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

[3] KOPRALEV, I. (main ed.), 2002. Geography of<br />

Bulgaria. Physical and socio-economic<br />

Consi<strong>de</strong>rable taxonomical diversity of the geography, Institute of Geography, BAS,<br />

medicinal plants of Provadiisko Plateau is i<strong>de</strong>ntified: Farkom, Sofia, 760 pp.<br />

376 species of vascular plants from 261 genera and [4] NINOV, N., 2002. Soils, in Kopr<strong>ale</strong>v, I. (main<br />

86 families.<br />

ed.). Geography of Bulgaria. Physical and socioeconomic<br />

geography, Institute of Geography,<br />

BAS, Farkom, Sofia, 760 pp.<br />

Most families (77.91%) and genera (98.85%) are<br />

represented in small numbers: 1 to 4.<br />

The analysis of life forms indicates the<br />

predominnce of geophytes, followed by the groups<br />

phanerophytes and hemi cryptophytes.<br />

The biological types are represented mainly by<br />

perennial herbaceous plants (53.19%) and annual<br />

herbaceous plants (12.77%).<br />

The i<strong>de</strong>ntified medicinal plants can be<br />

categorized into 7 types of floristic elements. The<br />

highest percentage species are of the circumboreal<br />

type (36.17%).<br />

Among the medicinal plants of Provadiisko<br />

Plateau 4 en<strong>de</strong>mites and 29 relicts are <strong>de</strong>scribed.<br />

39 species with protection status are <strong>de</strong>scribed:<br />

the use of 1 species is restricted by the Berne<br />

Convention and Natura 2000; 10 species are inclu<strong>de</strong>d<br />

in CITES; 10 species are inclu<strong>de</strong>d in IUCN Red List<br />

for Bulgaria; 8 species appear in the Red book for<br />

Bulgaria; 22 species are inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the Biological<br />

Diversity Act; 14 species are inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the category<br />

“Un<strong>de</strong>r the protection and regulated use of nature”,<br />

the collecting of herbs from their natural habitats is<br />

prohibited for 15 species, and 4 species are un<strong>de</strong>r a<br />

restrictive regime.<br />

The anthropophytes among the medicinal plants<br />

are 236 species (62.77%). Many of them are<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>red weed or ru<strong>de</strong>ral plants.<br />

5. References<br />

[1] GALABOV, J., 1966. Main lines of the relief<br />

(Common morphographic and morphometric<br />

characteristics), in Geography of Bulgaria,<br />

Physical geography – Relief, Vol. 1, Sofia.<br />

[2] VELEV, S., 2002. Climatic zoning, in Kopr<strong>ale</strong>v,<br />

I. (main ed.). Geography of Bulgaria. Physical<br />

and socio-economic geography, Institute of<br />

Geography, BAS, Farkom, Sofia, 760 pp.<br />

22<br />

[5] BONDEV, I., 1991. The vegetation of Bulgaria.<br />

Map in М 1:600 000 with explanatory text,<br />

University Press St. Kliment Ohridski, Sofia, 183<br />

pp.<br />

[6] STANEV, S., 2001. Little known names from<br />

Bulgarian botany, Pensoft, Sofia – Moscow, 202<br />

pp.<br />

[7] VELENOVSKY, J., 1891. Flora Bulgarica, Praga,<br />

676 рp.<br />

[8] VELENOVSKY, J., 1898. Flora Bulgarica,<br />

Supplementum I, Praga, 420 рp.<br />

[9] ZAHARIEV, D., Dimitrov D., 2009. The<br />

medicinal plants in area of Provadiisko Plato<br />

(Municipality Provadia), 8th National conference<br />

with international participation „Natural sciences<br />

– 2009”, 2-3.10.2009, Varna (upcoming).<br />

[10] ZAHARIEV, D., Uzunov G., 2009. A study of<br />

the flora in Protected place Madarski skalni<br />

venci, 8th National conference with international<br />

participation „Natural sciences – 2009”, 2-<br />

3.10.2009, Varna (upcoming).<br />

[11] Council Directive 92/43/EEC of the European<br />

Community to protect natural habitats and of<br />

wild fauna and flora.<br />

[12] Flora of PR Bulgaria, Vol. І-Х, 1963-1995,<br />

Publishing House of BAS, Sofia.<br />

[13] CHASE, M. (corresponding author), 2003. An<br />

update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group<br />

classification for the or<strong>de</strong>rs and families of<br />

flowering plants: APG II, The Linnean Society of<br />

London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean<br />

Society, 141: 399–436.<br />

[14] PAVLOV, D., 2006. Phytocoenology,<br />

Publishing House of University of Forestry,<br />

Sofia, 251 pp.<br />

[15] KOZUHAROV, S. (ed.), 1992. I<strong>de</strong>ntifier of the<br />

vascular plants in Bulgatia, Nauka i izkustvo,<br />

Sofia, 788 pp.


Dimcho Zahariev, Desislav Dimitrov / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 17-23 (2010)<br />

[16] ASIOV B., Petrova A., Dimitrov D., Vasilev R.,<br />

2006. Conspectus of the Bulgarian vascular flora.<br />

Distribution maps and floristic elements,<br />

Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation, Sofia, 452<br />

pp.<br />

[17] GRUEV, B., Kuzmanov B., 1994 – General<br />

biogeography, University Press St. Kliment<br />

Ohridski, Sofia, 498 pp.<br />

[18] PEEV, D., 2001. National park Rila.<br />

Management plan 2001 – 2010. Adopted by<br />

Resolution №522 of Council of Ministers on<br />

04.07.2001, Sofia, 338 pp.<br />

[19] BOŽA, P., Anačkov G., Igić R., Vukov D., Polić<br />

D., 2005. Flora “Rimskog šanca” (Vojvodina,<br />

Srbija), 8th Symposium on the flora of<br />

Southeastern Serbia and Neighbouring Regions,<br />

Niš, 20-24.06.2005, Abstracts, рр. 55.<br />

[20] PEEV, D., Kozuharov S., Anchev M., Petrova<br />

A., Ivanova D., Tzoneva S., 1998. Biodiversity<br />

of Vascular Plants in Bulgaria, In: Curt Meine<br />

(ed.), Bulgaria's Biological Diversity:<br />

Conservation Status and Needs Assessment,<br />

Volumes I and II, Washington, D.C.,<br />

Biodiversity Support Program, pp. 55–88.<br />

[21] Convention on International Tra<strong>de</strong> in<br />

Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora,<br />

State Gazette number 6 from 21 Januari 1992.<br />

[22] Red book of PR Bulgaria, Vol. 1, Plants, 1984,<br />

Publishing House of BAS, Sofia, 447 pp.<br />

[23] PETROVA А., Vladimirov V. (eds.), 2009. Red<br />

List of Bulgarian vascular plants, Phytologia<br />

Balcanica 15 (1): 63–94.<br />

[24] Biological Diversity Act, State Gazette number<br />

77 from 9 august 2002, pp. 9–42. Amen<strong>de</strong>d in<br />

State Gazette number 94 from 16 November<br />

2007.<br />

[25] Or<strong>de</strong>r number RD-72 from 3 februari 2006 for<br />

special arrangements for the conservation and<br />

use of medicinal plants, State Gazette number 16<br />

from 21 Februari 2006.<br />

[26] STEFANOV, B., Kitanov B., 1962. Kultigenen<br />

plants and kultigenen vegetation in Bulgaria,<br />

Publishing House of BAS, Sofia, 275 pp.<br />

23


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

THE PLANTS WITH PROTECTION STATUTE, ENDEMITES AND RELICTS<br />

OF THE SHUMENSKO PLATEAU<br />

Dimcho ZAHARIEV, Elka RADOSLAVOVA<br />

University of Shumen Bishop Konstantin Preslavski, Faculty of Nature Sciences,<br />

115 Universitetska Str., 9712, Shumen, Bulgaria<br />

dimtchoz@yahoo.com<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: As a result of our investigations of the Shoumen Plateau in the period 1998-2009, 786 species were<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntified, of which the number of species with conservation status is 80 (10.18%). 2 of those species are<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>d in Appendix II of Directive 92/43/ЕЕС. 24 of the species are inclu<strong>de</strong>d in CITES. 32 species are<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the IUCN Red List for Bulgaria un<strong>de</strong>r the following categories: threatened – 13, vulnerable – 9,<br />

nearly threatened – 5 and least concern – 5 species. In the Red book for Bulgaria, there are 7 endangered species<br />

and 14 are rare plants. In the Biological Diversity Act, 23 species are inclu<strong>de</strong>d in Appendix 3 and further 28<br />

species – in Appendix 4. The collecting of herbs from their natural habitats is prohibited for 12 species, and 6<br />

species are un<strong>de</strong>r a restriction. 29 species (3.69%) are en<strong>de</strong>mites. These are 17 Balkan suben<strong>de</strong>mites, 9 Balkan<br />

en<strong>de</strong>mites and 3 Bulgarian en<strong>de</strong>mites. The flora of the plateau inclu<strong>de</strong>s a significant number of relict species –<br />

42. (5.34%). The majority of them, 39 species, are Tertiary relicts, 2 are quaternary relicts and 1 is a postglacial<br />

steppe relict.<br />

Keywords: Shumensko Plateau, plants with protection statute, en<strong>de</strong>mites, relicts.<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Shumensko Plateau refers to an area in the hills<br />

east of the Danube plain, which was <strong>de</strong>clared<br />

protected by Natura 2000. This was <strong>de</strong>termined by the<br />

hills’ role in support of the biodiversity among large<br />

territories of scattered forests. The majority of the<br />

Shumensko Plateau area – 3929.9 ha (53%), was<br />

<strong>de</strong>clared for National Park in 1980. In 2003, the park<br />

was recognized as Nature Park. The regime of use<br />

and management of the park is <strong>de</strong>termined by the<br />

Protected Areas Act [1] and the Management Plan for<br />

the Nature Park [2].<br />

In the park is located the Bukaka Preserve. This<br />

is a forest area of 63.04 ha, <strong>de</strong>clared protected due to<br />

the indigenous forest that has existed there for several<br />

centuries and is comprised of Fagus sylvatica subsp.<br />

moesiaca. On the territory of the preserve, all human<br />

activity is prohibited, except for people passing on<br />

specifically marked paths.<br />

Shumensko Plateau has been <strong>de</strong>clared protected<br />

by Natura 2000 and its estimated area is 4490.62 hа.<br />

This territory is also protected un<strong>de</strong>r the Council<br />

Directive 92/43/EEC of the European Community<br />

for protecting natural habitats of wild fauna and flora<br />

[3].<br />

The unique combination of conditions in terms<br />

of topography, water resources, climate and soil,<br />

<strong>de</strong>termine the diversity of the plant species in the<br />

area. In the past, Velenovsky and his collaborators<br />

Hermengild Shkorpil and Anani Iavashev began the<br />

study of the plateau’s flora. In the 1980s, they<br />

collected the first botanical data in Northeast<br />

Bulgaria, including the area of the Shumen vicinity<br />

[4]. Their research is presented in the first volume on<br />

the Bulgarian flora [5] and its supplement [6].<br />

Davidov [7] conducted his own research on the flora<br />

of Shumen and the territory around the town. Further<br />

information about individual species, distributed on<br />

the plateau, can be found in Stoyanov and Stefanov<br />

[8, 9, 10], Stoyanov, Stefanov and Kitanov [11] and<br />

in Flora of PR Bulgaria, Vol. І – Х [12]. The<br />

diversity of species of the Orchidaceae family has<br />

been studied by Radoslavova [13]. In the<br />

Management Plan for the National Park Shumensko<br />

Plateau [2]: there are 550 species of vascular plants<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


The plants with protection statute, en<strong>de</strong>mites and relicts.../ Ovidius University Annals of Biology-Ecology 14: 25-31 (2010)<br />

(i.e. mosses not counted) <strong>de</strong>scribed in that source. Our<br />

studies [14] show that the number of vascular plants<br />

on the territory of the entire plateau is 786 species.<br />

According to the forest <strong>de</strong>velopment project of<br />

the Shumen Forestry [15], a total of 16 species have<br />

conservation statute and are inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the Red book<br />

of PR Bulgaria [16]. Seven of the species are<br />

endangered: Aesculus hippocastanum L., Anacamptis<br />

pyramidalis C. Rich., Anemone sylvestris L.,<br />

Castanea sativa Mill., Galanthus nivalis L.,<br />

Himantoglossum hircinum (L.) Spreng., Paeonia<br />

tenuifolia L. Nine of the species are rare: Atropa<br />

belladonna L., Celtis caucasica Willd., Cercis<br />

siliquastrum L., Cyclamen coum Mill., Fibigia<br />

clypeata (L.) Medic., Fritillaria pontica Wahl.,<br />

Haplophyllum thesioi<strong>de</strong>s G. Don., Jurinea le<strong>de</strong>borii<br />

Bunge., Pastinaca umbrosa Stev. ex DC. Six of these<br />

species are protected by the Biological Diversity Act<br />

(BDA) [17]: Aesculus hippocastanum L., Anacamptis<br />

pyramidalis C. Rich., Anemone sylvestris L.,<br />

Cyclamen coum Mill., Galanthus nivalis L.,<br />

Himantoglossum hircinum (L.) Spreng.<br />

Six of the plateau species are listed in the Red<br />

Book of the district Shumen [18]. Two of them are<br />

endangered: Lilium martagon L. and Campanula<br />

euxina (Vel.) Ancev. Four of the species are rare:<br />

Himantoglossum hircinum (L.) Spreng., Anacamptis<br />

piramidalis (L.) Rich., Ruscus hyppoglosum L. and<br />

Galium pasch<strong>ale</strong> Forsskal.<br />

In the Management Plan of the National Park<br />

Shumensko Plateau [2] are found 18 species with<br />

conservation statute that are also listed in the Red<br />

book of PR Bulgaria. Five of them are in the category<br />

“endangered”: Anemone sylvestris L., Colchicum<br />

davidovii Stefanov, Galanthus nivalis L., Ruta<br />

graveolens L., Veronica spicata L. Thirteen species<br />

fall into the category “rare”: Anthemis regis-borisii<br />

Stoj. et Acht., Anthemis rumelica (Velen.) Stoj. et<br />

Acht., Celtis caucasica Willd., Cyclamen coum Mill.,<br />

Erodium hoefftianum C. A. Meyer, Fibigia clypeata<br />

(L.) Medic., Fritillaria graeca Boiss. & Spruner,<br />

Fritillaria pontica Wahl., Galium bulgaricum Vel.,<br />

Haplophyllum thesioi<strong>de</strong>s G. Don., Hedysarum<br />

tauricum Pallas ex Willd., Jurinea le<strong>de</strong>borii Bunge.,<br />

Pastinaca umbrosa Stev. ex DC.<br />

2. Material and Methods<br />

26<br />

Our study of the flora of the Shoumen Plateau<br />

was conducted on the route method in 1998 – 2009.<br />

The names of the taxons are taken from the Flora of<br />

PR Bulgaria, Vol. І – Х [12]. The update of the<br />

taxons is consistent with APG II [19].<br />

The en<strong>de</strong>mites are represented by Asiov et all.<br />

[20].<br />

The relicts are represented by Gruev and<br />

Kuzmanov [21], Peev [22], Boža et all. [23], Peev et<br />

all. [24].<br />

The conservation statute is recognized using the<br />

following documents: Council Directive 92/43/EEC<br />

of the European Community to protect natural<br />

habitats and of wild fauna and flora [3], Convention<br />

on International Tra<strong>de</strong> in Endangered Species of<br />

Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) [25], Red book of PR<br />

Bulgaria [16], IUCN Red List for Bulgaria [26],<br />

Biological Diversity Act [17], Or<strong>de</strong>r for special<br />

arrangements for the conservation and use of<br />

medicinal plants [27].<br />

3. Results and Discussion<br />

The analysis of the received data leads to the<br />

following results and conclusions: Two species,<br />

Anacamptis pyramidalis C. Rich. and<br />

Himantoglossum hircinum (L.) Spreng., of the 16<br />

protected and listed as endangered species in the<br />

forest <strong>de</strong>velopment project of the Shumen Forestry<br />

do not fall into any category protected by the Red<br />

Book of PR Bulgaria. They are listed as “rare” in the<br />

Red Book of the district Shumen. Furthermore, in the<br />

Red List of the Bulgarian vascular plants, they are<br />

given similar status – “ vulnerable”. Three of the<br />

species: Atropa belladonna L., Castanea sativa Mill.<br />

and Paeonia tenuifolia L. we did not find on the<br />

territory of the plateau. Himantoglossum hircinum<br />

(L.) Spreng. is incorrectly recor<strong>de</strong>d as located in<br />

Bulgaria and should be replaced with the correct<br />

species name, Himantoglossum caprinum (Bieb.) C.<br />

Koch. The name Celtis caucasica Willd. is obsolete,<br />

now replaced by Celtis glabrata Steven.<br />

As a result of several years of observations, we<br />

found that populations of the following species have<br />

increased: Anacamptis pyramidalis C. Rich.,<br />

Cyclamen coum Mill., Galanthus nivalis L.,<br />

Himantoglossum caprinum (Bieb.) C. Koch., Lilium<br />

martagon L. and Ruta graveolens L. Therefore, they<br />

are not really endangered anymore.


Dimcho Zahariev, Elka Radoslavova / Ovidius University Annals of Biology-Ecology 14: 25-31 (2010)<br />

From the 18 protected species inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the<br />

Management Plan of National Park Shumensko<br />

Plateau, 2 species, Colchicum davidovii Stefanov and<br />

Veronica spicata L., listed as endangered, have not<br />

been confirmed by us as existing on the plateau. We<br />

think that Colchicum davidovii Stefanov has<br />

disappeared from the flora of the plateau.<br />

Four species listed as rare or “rare” species, we<br />

did not found on the plateau: Anthemis rumelica<br />

(Velen.) Stoj. et Acht., Fritillaria graeca Boiss. &<br />

Spruner, Galium bulgaricum Vel., Hedysarum<br />

tauricum Pallas ex Willd.<br />

The new data for the conservation statute of the<br />

species, established by us within the realm of the<br />

Shumensko Plateau, shows the following:<br />

The total number of species with conservation<br />

statute is 80 (Figure 1). This is a 10.18% from the<br />

total number of species found on the Shumensko<br />

Plateau. We found the following species:<br />

1. Aegilops geniculata Roth<br />

2. Aesculus hippocastanum L.<br />

3. Althaea officinalis L.<br />

4. Anacamptis pyramidalis C. Rich.<br />

5. Anemone sylvestris L.<br />

6. Anthemis regis-borisii Stoj. et Acht.<br />

7. Artemisia pe<strong>de</strong>montana Balb.<br />

8. Asarum europaeum L.<br />

9. Asparagus tenuifolius Lam.<br />

10. Asparagus verticillatus L.<br />

11. Asplenium trichomanes L.<br />

12. Berberis vulgaris L.<br />

13. Betonica officinalis L.<br />

14. Bupleurum affine Sadl.<br />

15. Bupleurum apiculatum Friv.<br />

16. Bupleurum praealtum L.<br />

17. Bupleurum rotundifolium L.<br />

18. Campanula euxina (Vel.) Ancev<br />

19. Carlina acanthifolia All.<br />

20. Celtis glabrata Steven<br />

21. Centaurea marshalliana Spreng.<br />

22. Cephalanthera damasonium (Mill.) Druce<br />

23. Cephalanthera longifolia (L.) Fritsch<br />

24. Cephalanthera rubra (L.) Rich.<br />

25. Cercis siliquastrum L.<br />

26. Convallaria majalis L.<br />

27. Crocus flavus West.<br />

28. Crocus pallasii Bieb.<br />

29. Cyclamen coum Mill.<br />

30. Dactylorhiza saccifera (Brongn.) Soo<br />

27<br />

31. Dryopteris filix-mas (L.) Schott<br />

32. Echinops sphaerocephalos L.<br />

33. Epipactis helleborine (L.) Crantz<br />

34. Epipactis microphylla (Ehrh.) Sw.<br />

35. Epipactis purpurata Smith<br />

36. Erodium hoefftianum C. A. Mey.<br />

37. Fibigia clypeata (L.) Medic.<br />

38. Fritillaria pontica Wahl.<br />

39. Galanthus elwesii Hook. fil.<br />

40. Galanthus nivalis L.<br />

41. Galium odoratum (L.) Scop.<br />

42. Galium rubioi<strong>de</strong>s L.<br />

43. Gypsophila paniculata L.<br />

44. Haplophyllum thesioi<strong>de</strong>s G. Don.<br />

45. Helichrysum arenarium (L.) Mornh.<br />

46. Himantoglossum caprinum (Bieb.) C. Koch<br />

47. Juniperus sabina L.<br />

48. Jurinea le<strong>de</strong>bourii Bunge<br />

49. Lilium martagon L.<br />

50. Limodorum abortivum (L.) Sw.<br />

51. Listera ovata (L.) R. Br.<br />

52. Neottia nidus-avis (L.) Rich.<br />

53. Ophrys apifera Huds.<br />

54. Ophrys cornuta Stev.<br />

55. Ophrys mammosa Desf.<br />

56. Orchis morio L.<br />

57. Orchis purpurea Huds.<br />

58. Orchis simia Lam.<br />

59. Orchis tri<strong>de</strong>ntata Scop.<br />

60. Pastinaca umbrosa Stev. et DC.<br />

61. Phyllitis scolopendrium (L.) Newm.<br />

62. Platanthera chlorantha (Cust.) Rchb.<br />

63. Polygonatum odoratum (Mill.) Druce<br />

64. Polystichum aculeatum (L.) Roth<br />

65. Primula veris L.<br />

66. Pulmonaria mollis Horn.<br />

67. Ruscus aculeatus L.<br />

68. Ruscus hypoglossum L.<br />

69. Ruta graveolens L.<br />

70. Salix caprea L.<br />

71. Scilla bifolia L.<br />

72. Sedum acre L.<br />

73. Sternbergia colchiciflora Waldst. et Kit.<br />

74. Stipa capillata L.<br />

75. Stipa pulcherrima C. Koch<br />

76. Stipa tirsa Stev.<br />

77. Taxus baccata L.<br />

78. Tilia rubra DC.<br />

79. V<strong>ale</strong>riana officinalis L.


The plants with protection statute, en<strong>de</strong>mites and relicts.../ Ovidius University Annals of Biology-Ecology 14: 25-31 (2010)<br />

80. Vicia pisiformis L.<br />

Two species are inclu<strong>de</strong>d in Application II of<br />

Directive 92/43/ЕЕС: Cyclamen coum Mill. and<br />

Himantoglossum caprinum (Bieb.) C. Koch.<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

2<br />

24<br />

32<br />

21<br />

51<br />

1<br />

12<br />

6<br />

29<br />

42<br />

Directive 92/43/ЕЕС<br />

CITES<br />

IUCN Red List<br />

Red book<br />

BDA<br />

Herbs prohibited from collecting<br />

Herbs in the restrictive regime<br />

En<strong>de</strong>mites<br />

Relicts<br />

Fig. 1. Proportion of species with<br />

conservation status, en<strong>de</strong>mites and relicts<br />

In the Convention on International Tra<strong>de</strong> in<br />

Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora<br />

(CITES) are inclu<strong>de</strong>d 24 species: Anacamptis<br />

pyramidalis C. Rich., Cephalanthera damasonium<br />

(Mill.) Druce, Cephalanthera longifolia (L.) Fritsch,<br />

Cephalanthera rubra (L.) Rich., Cyclamen coum<br />

Mill., Dactylorhiza saccifera (Brongn.) Soo,<br />

Epipactis helleborine (L.) Crantz, Epipactis<br />

microphylla (Ehrh.) Sw., Epipactis purpurata Smith,<br />

Galanthus elwesii Hook. fil., Galanthus nivalis L.,<br />

Himantoglossum caprinum (Bieb.) C. Koch,<br />

Limodorum abortivum (L.) Sw., Listera ovata (L.) R.<br />

Br., Neottia nidus-avis (L.) Rich., Ophrys apifera<br />

Huds., Ophrys cornuta Stev., Ophrys mammosa<br />

Desf., Orchis morio L., Orchis purpurea Huds.,<br />

Orchis simia Lam., Orchis tri<strong>de</strong>ntata Scop.,<br />

Platanthera chlorantha (Cust.) Rchb., Sternbergia<br />

colchiciflora Waldst. et Kit.<br />

The IUCN Red List for Bulgaria are inclu<strong>de</strong>d 32<br />

species. In category „threatened” are inclu<strong>de</strong>d 13<br />

species: Aesculus hippocastanum L., Anthemis regisborisii<br />

Stoj. et Acht., Artemisia pe<strong>de</strong>montana Balb.,<br />

Campanula euxina (Vel.) Ancev, Celtis glabrata<br />

Steven, Epipactis purpurata Smith, Galanthus elwesii<br />

Hook. fil., Galanthus nivalis L., Juniperus sabina L.,<br />

Jurinea le<strong>de</strong>bourii Bunge, Ophrys apifera Huds.,<br />

Ruta graveolens L., Taxus baccata L. In category<br />

„vulnerable” are inclu<strong>de</strong>d 9 species: Anacamptis<br />

pyramidalis C. Rich., Epipactis microphylla (Ehrh.)<br />

Sw., Fibigia clypeata (L.) Medic., Haplophyllum<br />

28<br />

thesioi<strong>de</strong>s G. Don., Himantoglossum caprinum<br />

(Bieb.) C. Koch, Limodorum abortivum (L.) Sw.,<br />

Ophrys cornuta Stev., Ophrys mammosa Desf.,<br />

Pastinaca umbrosa Stev. et DC. In category „nearly<br />

threatened” 5 species: Anemone sylvestris L., Cercis<br />

siliquastrum L., Erodium hoefftianum C. A. Mey.,<br />

Galium rubioi<strong>de</strong>s L., Vicia pisiformis L. In category<br />

„least concern” are inclu<strong>de</strong>d 5 species: Aegilops<br />

geniculata Roth, Cyclamen coum Mill., Fritillaria<br />

pontica Wahl., Pulmonaria mollis Horn., Tilia rubra<br />

DC.<br />

In the Red book for PR Bulgaria are inclu<strong>de</strong>d<br />

total of 21 species. In the category „endangered” are<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>d 7 species: Aesculus hippocastanum L.,<br />

Anemone sylvestris L., Artemisia pe<strong>de</strong>montana<br />

Balb., Galanthus nivalis L., Galium rubioi<strong>de</strong>s L.,<br />

Ruta graveolens L., Taxus baccata L. In category<br />

„rare” are inclu<strong>de</strong>d 14 species: Anthemis regisborisii<br />

Stoj. et Acht., Celtis glabrata Steven, Cercis<br />

siliquastrum L., Cyclamen coum Mill., Erodium<br />

hoefftianum C. A. Mey., Fibigia clypeata (L.)<br />

Medic., Fritillaria pontica Wahl., Haplophyllum<br />

thesioi<strong>de</strong>s G. Don., Juniperus sabina L., Jurinea<br />

le<strong>de</strong>bourii Bunge, Limodorum abortivum (L.) Sw.,<br />

Pastinaca umbrosa Stev. et DC., Tilia rubra DC.,<br />

Vicia pisiformis L.<br />

In the Biological Diversity Act are inclu<strong>de</strong>d total<br />

of 51 species. In the category „protected”<br />

(Application 3) are inclu<strong>de</strong>d 23 species: Aesculus<br />

hippocastanum L., Anacamptis pyramidalis C. Rich.,<br />

Anemone sylvestris L., Anthemis regis-borisii Stoj. et<br />

Acht., Artemisia pe<strong>de</strong>montana Balb., Campanula<br />

euxina (Vel.) Ancev, Centaurea marshalliana<br />

Spreng., Cyclamen coum Mill., Epipactis purpurata<br />

Smith, Fritillaria pontica Wahl., Galanthus elwesii<br />

Hook. fil., Galanthus nivalis L., Galium rubioi<strong>de</strong>s<br />

L., Haplophyllum thesioi<strong>de</strong>s G. Don.,<br />

Himantoglossum caprinum (Bieb.) C. Koch,<br />

Juniperus sabina L., Jurinea le<strong>de</strong>bourii Bunge,<br />

Limodorum abortivum (L.) Sw., Ophrys apifera<br />

Huds., Ophrys cornuta Stev., Ophrys mammosa<br />

Desf., Ruta graveolens L., Taxus baccata L.<br />

In the category “un<strong>de</strong>r protection and un<strong>de</strong>r<br />

controlled use” (Application 4) are 28 species:<br />

Asparagus tenuifolius Lam., Asparagus verticillatus<br />

L., Bupleurum affine Sadl., Bupleurum apiculatum<br />

Friv., Bupleurum praealtum L., Bupleurum<br />

rotundifolium L., Crocus flavus West., Crocus<br />

pallasii Bieb., Dactylorhiza saccifera (Brongn.) Soo,


Dimcho Zahariev, Elka Radoslavova / Ovidius University Annals of Biology-Ecology 14: 25-31 (2010)<br />

Dryopteris filix-mas (L.) Schott, Echinops<br />

sphaerocephalos L., Gypsophila paniculata L.,<br />

Helichrysum arenarium (L.) Mornh., Lilium<br />

martagon L., Orchis morio L., Orchis purpurea<br />

Huds., Orchis simia Lam., Orchis tri<strong>de</strong>ntata Scop.,<br />

Polygonatum odoratum (Mill.) Druce, Polystichum<br />

aculeatum (L.) Roth, Primula veris L., Ruscus<br />

aculeatus L., Ruscus hypoglossum L., Salix caprea<br />

L., Scilla bifolia L., Stipa capillata L., Stipa<br />

pulcherrima C. Koch, Stipa tirsa Stev.<br />

Prohibited is the collecting ofherbs from the<br />

natural habitats of 12 species: Althaea officinalis L.,<br />

Asarum europaeum L., Asplenium trichomanes L.,<br />

Convallaria majalis L., Helichrysum arenarium (L.)<br />

Mornh., Orchis morio L., Orchis purpurea Huds.,<br />

Orchis simia Lam., Orchis tri<strong>de</strong>ntata Scop., Phyllitis<br />

scolopendrium (L.) Newm., Ruscus aculeatus L.,<br />

V<strong>ale</strong>riana officinalis L.<br />

Un<strong>de</strong>r a controlled use are 6 species: Berberis<br />

vulgaris L., Betonica officinalis L., Carlina<br />

acanthifolia All., Galium odoratum (L.) Scop.,<br />

Primula veris L., Sedum acre L.<br />

En<strong>de</strong>mic species (Figure 1) are relatively well<br />

represented – 29 species (3.69% of all species on the<br />

plateau). Their number is close to the nation-wi<strong>de</strong><br />

average – 4.86% [24]. This group inclu<strong>de</strong>s 17 Balkan<br />

suben<strong>de</strong>mites: Campanula grossekii Heuff.,<br />

Campanula lingulata W. et K., Carduus candicans<br />

Waldst. et Kit., Chaerophyllum byzantinum Boiss.,<br />

Doronicum orient<strong>ale</strong> Hoffm., Galium heldreichii<br />

Hal., Galium pasch<strong>ale</strong> Forsskal, Galium<br />

pseudoaristatum Schur., Ophrys cornuta Stev.,<br />

Pseudolysimachion barrelieri (Schott ex Roem. et<br />

Schult.) Holub, Salvia amplexicaulis Lam., Senecio<br />

papposus (Reichenb.) Less., Stachys obliqua Waldst.<br />

et Kit., Symphytum ottomanum Friv., Syringa vulgaris<br />

L., Thesium simplex Vel., Verbascum lychnitis L. The<br />

Balkan en<strong>de</strong>mites are 9 species: Achillea clypeolata<br />

Sibth. et Sm., Aesculus hippocastanum L., Bupleurum<br />

apiculatum Friv., Inula aschersoniana Janka, Knautia<br />

macedonica Griseb., Koeleria simonkaii Adam.,<br />

Onosma thracica Vel., Salvia ringens Sibth. et Sm.,<br />

Sesleria latifolia (Adam.) Deg. The Bulgarian<br />

en<strong>de</strong>mites are 3 species: Anthemis regis-borisii Stoj.<br />

et Acht., Campanula euxina (Vel.) Ancev, Myosotis<br />

aspera Vel.<br />

Data for the relict species on the area of the<br />

plateau was first published by Zahariev and<br />

Radoslavova [14]. The flora of the plateau inclu<strong>de</strong>d<br />

29<br />

significant number of relict species – 42 (Figure 1).<br />

They account for 5.34% of the total species. The<br />

majority of them, 39 species, are Tertiary relicts:<br />

Abies alba Mil., Acer campestre L., Acer hyrcanum<br />

Fisch. et C. A. Meyer, Acer pseudoplatanus L., Acer<br />

tataricum L., Aesculus hippocastanum L., Betula<br />

pendula Roth, Carpinus betulus L., Carpinus<br />

orientalis Mill., Celtis glabrata Steven, Cercis<br />

siliquastrum L., Clematis vitalba L., Corylus<br />

avellana L., Cotinus coggygria Scop., Cyclamen<br />

coum Mill., Fraxinus excelsior L., Fraxinus ornus<br />

L., He<strong>de</strong>ra helix L., Juniperus communis L.,<br />

Lathyrus aureus (Stev.) Brandza, Pastinaca umbrosa<br />

Stev. et DС., Phragmites australis (Cav.) Steud.,<br />

Picea abies (L.) Karsten, Pinus nigra Arn., Populus<br />

alba L., Populus nigra L., Populus tremula L.,<br />

Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn., Quercus cerris L.,<br />

Quercus d<strong>ale</strong>champii Ten., Ruscus aculeatus L.,<br />

Ruscus hypoglossum L., Salix alba L., Salix caprea<br />

L., Taxus baccata L., Ulmus laevis Pall., Ulmus<br />

minor Mill., Viburnum lantana L., Viscum album L.<br />

They were wi<strong>de</strong>spread during the Tertiary, but their<br />

habitats today are much smaller.<br />

The second group are quaternary relicts. They<br />

have become part of our flora as a result of glaciation<br />

during the Quaternary. Therefore, they are<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>red glacial relicts. On the plateau, there are<br />

two such species: Limodorum abortivum (L.) Sw.<br />

and Galanthus nivalis L. From the third group, the<br />

postglacial steppe relict, only one species is found:<br />

Sternbergia colchiciflora Waldst. et Kit.<br />

The species with highest conservation value, i.e.<br />

those that fall into the categories of being<br />

endangered and vulnerable, are 24 in number.<br />

With the highest conservation value is Cyclamen<br />

coum Mill., which is inclu<strong>de</strong>d in 6 different lists of<br />

endangered species: Directive 92/43/ЕЕС, CITES,<br />

IUCN Red List, Red book, BDA, Tertiary relicts.<br />

Second comes the group of the species<br />

Galanthus nivalis L. and Limodorum abortivum (L.)<br />

Sw. They appear in 5 different lists: CITES, IUCN<br />

Red List, Red book, BDA, quaternary relicts. This<br />

also applies to Aesculus hippocastanum L., which is<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the following lists: IUCN Red List, Red<br />

book, BDA, Balkan en<strong>de</strong>mites, Tertiary relicts.<br />

The third group of species that is listed in 4 lists<br />

is Himantoglossum caprinum (Bieb.) C. Koch.<br />

(Directive 92/43/ЕЕС, CITES, IUCN Red List, ЗБР),<br />

Anthemis regis-borisii Stoj. et Acht. (IUCN Red List,


The plants with protection statute, en<strong>de</strong>mites and relicts.../ Ovidius University Annals of Biology-Ecology 14: 25-31 (2010)<br />

Red book, BDA, Bulgarian en<strong>de</strong>mites), Ophrys<br />

cornuta Stev. (CITES, IUCN Red List, BDA, Balkan<br />

suben<strong>de</strong>mites), Taxus baccata L. (IUCN Red List,<br />

Red book, BDA, Tertiary relicts).<br />

The largest is the group of species that appear in<br />

the following lists:<br />

• CITES, IUCN Red List, BDA – Anacamptis<br />

pyramidalis C. Rich., Epipactis purpurata<br />

Smith, Galanthus elwesii Hook. fil., Ophrys<br />

apifera Huds., Ophrys mammosa Desf.;<br />

• IUCN Red List, Red book, BDA – Anemone<br />

sylvestris L., Fritillaria pontica Wahl., Galium<br />

rubioi<strong>de</strong>s L., Haplophyllum thesioi<strong>de</strong>s G.<br />

Don., Juniperus sabina L., Jurinea le<strong>de</strong>bourii<br />

Bunge, Ruta graveolens L.;<br />

• IUCN Red List, Red book, Tertiary relicts –<br />

Celtis glabrata Steven, Cercis siliquastrum L.,<br />

Pastinaca umbrosa Stev. et DC.;<br />

• IUCN Red List, BDA, Bulgarian en<strong>de</strong>mites –<br />

Campanula euxina (Vel.) Ancev.<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

The total number of species with conservation<br />

statute that we found on the Shoumen plateau is 80<br />

(10.18% of all species on the plateau). It is<br />

significantly larger than the data published by other<br />

authors. In our study, we use more recent documents<br />

on nature conservation. They total 6 in comparison to<br />

3 or 4 in previous publications. The species that we<br />

<strong>de</strong>scribed generally appear in 12 lists of endangered<br />

species.<br />

The en<strong>de</strong>mic species that we found on the plateau<br />

and <strong>de</strong>scribed are 29 species (3.69% of the total<br />

number of species). They inclu<strong>de</strong> 17 Balkan<br />

suben<strong>de</strong>mites, 9 Balkan en<strong>de</strong>mites and 3 Bulgarian<br />

en<strong>de</strong>mites.<br />

The flora of the plateau inclu<strong>de</strong>s significant<br />

number of relict species – 42 (5.34% of the total<br />

number of species). The majority of them are Tertiary<br />

relicts: 39 species, 2 are quaternary relicts and 1 is<br />

postglacial steppe relict.<br />

The largest number of species of conservation<br />

statute confirms the importance of the Shoumen<br />

Plateau as a protected site, preserving the wellbeing<br />

of nature in the future.<br />

30<br />

5. References<br />

[1] Protected Areas Act, State Gazette number 133<br />

from 11 November 1998, Amen<strong>de</strong>d in State<br />

Gazette number 98 from 12 November 1999,...,<br />

Amen<strong>de</strong>d in State Gazette number 19 from 13<br />

March 2009.<br />

[2] ANDREEV, N., 1992. Botanical characteristics<br />

of National Park Shumensko Plateau, in<br />

National Park Shumensko Plateau. Technical<br />

Project Green Construction, Agrolesproject, pp.<br />

17–62.<br />

[3] Council Directive 92/43/EEC of the European<br />

Community to protect natural habitats and of<br />

wild fauna and flora.<br />

[4] STANEV, S., 2001. Little known names from<br />

Bulgarian botany, Pensoft, Sofia – Moscow,<br />

202 pp.<br />

[5] VELENOVSKY, J., 1891. Flora Bulgarica,<br />

Praga, 676 рp.<br />

[6] VELENOVSKY, J., 1898. Flora Bulgarica,<br />

Supplementum I, Praga, 420 рp.<br />

[7] DAVIDOV, B., 1904. Contribution to study the<br />

flora of the district of Shumen, Sbornik ot<br />

narodni umotvoreniya, ХХ (II): 1–54.<br />

[8] STOIANOV, N., Stefanov B., 1924-1925. Flora<br />

of Bulgaria, Vol. I-II, Sofia, pp. 1367.<br />

[9] STOIANOV, N., Stefanov B., 1932-1933. Flora<br />

of Bulgaria, Vol. I-II, Sofia.<br />

[10] STOIANOV, N., Stefanov B., 1947-1948. Flora<br />

of Bulgaria, Vol. I-II, Sofia, pp. 1361.<br />

[11] STOIANOV, N., Stefanov B., Kitanov, B.,<br />

1966-1967. Flora of Bulgaria, Vol. I-II, Nauka i<br />

izkustvo, Sofia, pp. 1325.<br />

[12] Flora of PR Bulgaria, Vol. І-Х, 1963-1995,<br />

Publishing House of BAS, Sofia.<br />

[13] RADOSLAVOVA, Е., 2002. The Orchids of the<br />

Shumensko Plateau, Snejanka Petkova – AR,<br />

Shumen, pp. 48.<br />

[14] ZAHARIEV, D., Radoslavova, E., 2010. The<br />

Plants of the Shumensko Plateau, Himera,<br />

Shumen, pp. 597.<br />

[15] Forest <strong>de</strong>velopment project of the Shumen State<br />

Forestry, district Shumen, Vol. I, 2002,<br />

Anemone Ltd., Sofia, pp. 148.<br />

[16] Red book of PR Bulgaria, Vol. 1, Plants, 1984,<br />

Publishing House of BAS, Sofia, 447 pp.<br />

[17] Biological Diversity Act, State Gazette number<br />

77 from 9 august 2002, pp. 9–42. Amen<strong>de</strong>d in


Dimcho Zahariev, Elka Radoslavova / Ovidius University Annals of Biology-Ecology 14: 25-31 (2010)<br />

State Gazette number 94 from 16 November<br />

2007.<br />

[18] BESHKOV, V. et all.. (eds.), 1994. The Red<br />

book of the district Shumen, Slavcho Nikolov &<br />

co, Shumen, pp. 199.<br />

[19] CHASE, M. (corresponding author), 2003. An<br />

update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group<br />

classification for the or<strong>de</strong>rs and families of<br />

flowering plants: APG II, The Linnean Society<br />

of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean<br />

Society, 141: 399–436.<br />

[20] ASIOV B., Petrova A., Dimitrov D., Vasilev R.,<br />

2006. Conspectus of the Bulgarian vascular<br />

flora. Distribution maps and floristic elements,<br />

Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation, Sofia, 452<br />

pp.<br />

[21] GRUEV, B., Kuzmanov B., 1994. General<br />

biogeography, University Press St. Kliment<br />

Ohridski, Sofia, 498 pp.<br />

[22] PEEV, D., 2001. National park Rila.<br />

Management plan 2001, 2010. Adopted by<br />

Resolution №522 of Council of Ministers on<br />

04.07.2001, Sofia, 338 pp.<br />

[23] BOŽA, P., Anačkov G., Igić R., Vukov D., Polić<br />

D., 2005. Flora “Rimskog šanca” (Vojvodina,<br />

Srbija), 8th Symposium on the flora of<br />

Southeastern Serbia and Neighbouring Regions,<br />

Niš, 20-24.06.2005, Abstracts, рр. 55.<br />

[24] PEEV, D., Kozuharov S., Anchev M., Petrova<br />

A., Ivanova D., Tzoneva S., 1998. Biodiversity<br />

of Vascular Plants in Bulgaria, In: Curt Meine<br />

(ed.), Bulgaria's Biological Diversity:<br />

Conservation Status and Needs Assessment,<br />

Volumes I and II, Washington, D.C.,<br />

Biodiversity Support Program, pp. 55–88.<br />

[25] Convention on International Tra<strong>de</strong> in<br />

Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora,<br />

State Gazette number 6 from 21 Januari 1992.<br />

[26] PETROVA А., Vladimirov V. (eds.), 2009. Red<br />

List of Bulgarian vascular plants, Phytologia<br />

Balcanica 15 (1): 63–94.<br />

[27] Or<strong>de</strong>r number RD-72 from 3 februari 2006 for<br />

special arrangements for the conservation and use<br />

of medicinal plants, State Gazette number 16<br />

from 21 Februari 2006.<br />

31


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

A CHARACTERISTIC OF MODEL HABITATS IN SOUTH DOBRUDJA<br />

Dimcho ZAHARIEV<br />

University of Shumen Bishop Konstantin Preslavski, Faculty of Nature Sciences,<br />

115 Universitetska Str., 9712, Shumen, Bulgaria, dimtchoz@yahoo.com<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: Five natural habitats and five artificial habitats (forest shelter belts) are investigated in South<br />

Dobrudja. Most taxonomical diversity and most protected species from natural habitats are established in Western<br />

Pontic Paeonian steppes near to Bejanovo village. In the forest shelter belts is typical less taxonomical diversity,<br />

less protected species and more anthropophytes, which due to strong anthropogenically influence. The families<br />

with most of genera and species are: Asteraceae, Рoaceae, Rosaceae and Lamiaceae. The biggest groups from<br />

biological types are perennial herbaceous plants and annual herbaceous plants. The floristic elements are<br />

presented mainly from circumboreal, European and Mediterranean elements. The mainly reasons about high<br />

number of anthropophytes are intensive fragmentation of the natural habitats, all round from agricultural areas – a<br />

source of anthropophytes, and their accessibility for peoples and domestic animals.<br />

Keywords: Dobrudja, habitats, taxonomical diversity, biological types, floristic elements, en<strong>de</strong>mites, relict<br />

species, protected species, anthropophytes.<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Dobrudja is historical and geographical area<br />

between the lower reaches of the Danube and Black<br />

Sea. The area is 23 000 km 2 . It is divi<strong>de</strong>d into two<br />

parts – North and South Dobrudja.<br />

North Dobrudja is located in Southeastern<br />

Romania. Its area covers about 2/3 of the territory,<br />

amounting to 15 435 km².<br />

South Dobrudja is located in Northeastern<br />

Bulgaria. The area is 7 565 km². The Bulgarian part<br />

of Dobrudja is divi<strong>de</strong>d by the virtual line between<br />

Stojer village and Rosica village into two parts –<br />

eastern and western. South Dobrudja is located in 3<br />

administrative areas – Varnenska (municipality<br />

Aksakovo), Dobrichka (all municipalities) and<br />

Silistrenska (municipality Kainardja).<br />

The climate is temperate. It is characterized by<br />

warm summers and cold winters, high annual<br />

amplitu<strong>de</strong> of air temperature, spring–summer<br />

minimum and winter maximum of rainfall, the snow<br />

cover is relatively stable. The average temperatures in<br />

January are between 0°С and –1.5°С. In the summer<br />

dominated tropical and subtropical air masses and the<br />

average temperature in July is 22-24°С. The spring<br />

and the autumn are approximately the same<br />

temperatures. April was warmer in October. The<br />

rainfalls are with maximum in May–June and with<br />

minimum in February–March. The annual amount of<br />

precipitation is 520 to 650 mm. About 10% of the<br />

total amount of precipitation is snow [1].<br />

In South Dobrudja dominated haplic Chernozems.<br />

Small areas are covered with kastanic, calcaric<br />

or gleyc Chernozems. On the coast of the Black Sea<br />

and the rivers are distributed rendzic Leptosols and<br />

Nitisols. Along the Danube are distributed calcaric<br />

Fluvisols, Histosols and Gleysols. Unique to the<br />

region are the small in area Vertisols [2].<br />

In terms of its flora, South Dobrudja belongs to<br />

the region of Northeastern Bulgaria. On its territory<br />

are <strong>de</strong>scribed 1 508 species, which are referred to 496<br />

genera and 144 families. Natural vegetation was<br />

composed of forest steppes, which inclu<strong>de</strong> large<br />

forest complexes and grasslands. Original natural<br />

vegetation of the Dobrudja was <strong>de</strong>stroyed in a large<br />

part, due to intensive human activities [3]. Today on<br />

the territory of Southern Dobrudja occur 41 different<br />

plant communities – primary and secondary [4]. 33<br />

habitats are <strong>de</strong>scribed according to Council Directive<br />

92/43/EEC of the European Community to protect<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


A characteristic of mo<strong>de</strong>l habitatas in South Dobrudja /Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 33-44 (2010)<br />

natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora [5, 6, 7, 8,<br />

9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14].<br />

2. Material and Methods<br />

The field studies were conducted on the route<br />

method in 2008 – 2009. Subject of research are a<br />

total of 10 different habitats – 5 natural and 5<br />

artificial. The natural habitats are <strong>de</strong>fined by<br />

Kavrakova et all. [15]. Each habitat is characterized<br />

as follows: average altitu<strong>de</strong>, exposure, slope, area,<br />

soil type and subtype, base rock, cover of tree, shrub<br />

and herbaceous vegetation, number of established<br />

species, genera and families, cover of each species,<br />

distribution in biological type, floristic elements,<br />

en<strong>de</strong>mites, suben<strong>de</strong>mites and relict species, species<br />

with conservation status, anthropophytes,<br />

anthropogenic influence. The average altitu<strong>de</strong>,<br />

exposure, slope and area are <strong>de</strong>fined with map at a<br />

sc<strong>ale</strong> 1:50 000. The soil types and subtypes are<br />

presented by Ninov [2]. The taxons and the biological<br />

type are <strong>de</strong>fined by I<strong>de</strong>ntifier of the vascular plants in<br />

Bulgatia [16], Flora of PR Bulgaria, Vol. І – Х [17].<br />

The update of the taxons is consistent with APG II<br />

[18] and Petrova et all. [19]. The cover of each<br />

species is presented by Braun-Blanquet [20]. The<br />

following symbols are used: r – cover less than 5%,<br />

one individual; + – cover less than 5%, 2-5<br />

individuals; 1 – cover less than 5%, 6-50 individuals;<br />

2m – cover less than 5%, more than 50 individuals;<br />

2a – cover 5-12.5%; 2b – cover 12.5-25%; 3 – cover<br />

25-50%; 4 – cover 50-75%; 5 – cover 75-100%. The<br />

following symbols are used [16] for biological types:<br />

t (from English tree), sh (from English shrub), p<br />

(from English perennial), а (from English annual).<br />

The floristic elements, en<strong>de</strong>mites and suben<strong>de</strong>mites<br />

are presented by Asiov et all. [21]. The relicts are<br />

presented by Gruev and Kuzmanov [22], Peev [23],<br />

Boža et all. [24], Peev et all. [25]. The conservation<br />

status is presented using the following documents:<br />

Council Directive 92/43/EEC of the European<br />

Community to protect natural habitats and of wild<br />

fauna and flora [26], Berne Convention [27],<br />

Convention on International Tra<strong>de</strong><br />

in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora<br />

(CITES) [28], Red book of PR Bulgaria [29], IUCN<br />

Red List for Bulgaria [30], Biological Diversity Act<br />

[27], Or<strong>de</strong>r for special arrangements for the<br />

conservation and use of medicinal plants [31]. The<br />

34<br />

anthropophytes are presented by Stefanov and<br />

Kitanov [32]. is recor<strong>de</strong>d by the system of effects<br />

used in the assessment of an object from the network<br />

of protected areas Nature 2000.<br />

3. Results and Discussion<br />

HABITAT 1<br />

A habitat by Nature 2000: Euro-Siberian<br />

steppic woods with Quercus spp.<br />

A habitat by Bon<strong>de</strong>v [4]: Cerris oak (Querceta<br />

cerris) forests.<br />

It is located southwest of Efreitor Bakalovo<br />

village, municipality Krushari. The territory is a part<br />

of Nature 2000 (Protected area “Suha reka”). The<br />

average altitu<strong>de</strong> is 150 m. The exposure is south. The<br />

slope varies in different parts. It is smaller in the<br />

north and higher in southern parts. The area of the<br />

habitat is 6 300 dka. The soil type is Chernozems,<br />

and the soil subtype is haplic Chernozems. The<br />

bedrock is limestone. The cover of the tree vegetation<br />

is 80%, the cover of the shrub vegetation is 10% and<br />

the cover of the herbaceous vegetation is 10%.<br />

In the habitat have been in<strong>de</strong>tified 78 species of<br />

vascular plants from 67 genera and 27 families. The<br />

families with greatest number of genera are as<br />

follows: Asteraceae – 8 (11.94%), Poaceae – 8<br />

(11.94%), Brassicaceae – 5 (7.46%) and Fabaceae –<br />

5 (7.46%). The families with greatest number of<br />

species are as follows: Poaceae – 10 (12.82%),<br />

Rosaceae – 9 (11.54%), Asteraceae – 8 (10.26%),<br />

Brassicaceae – 6 (7.69%), Fabaceae – 5 (6.41%),<br />

Lamiaceae – 5 (6.41%) and Scrophulariaceae – 5<br />

(6.41%). The genera with greatest number of species<br />

are as follows: Veronica – with 4 species (5.13%),<br />

Poa – with 3 species (3.85%) and Potentilla – with 3<br />

species (3.85%).<br />

With the highest percentage of coverage are<br />

Quercus cerris L. (5) and Poa nemoralis L. (2a).<br />

With the lowest percentage of coverage (1) are<br />

Cornus mas L., Carduus nutans L. and Vicia sativa<br />

L. Each of the remaining 73 species has coverage 2m.<br />

The distribution of species in biological type is<br />

as follows: The perennial herbaceous plants (p) are<br />

most – they are 38 species (48.72%). Secondly, are


Dimcho Zahariev / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 33-44 (2010)<br />

annual herbaceous plants (a) with 21 species<br />

(26.92%). The next is the transition group of annual<br />

to biennial herbaceous plants (a-b) with 6 species<br />

(7.69%). The trees (t) and the transition group of<br />

shrubs to trees (sh-t) have equal number of species –<br />

4 (5.13%). The biennial herbaceous plants (b) are 3<br />

species (3.85%), and shrubs (sh) are 2 species<br />

(2.56%) only.<br />

The diversity of floristic elements is as follows:<br />

The largest number of species (28) has circumboreal<br />

origin. The next are species with European origin –<br />

they are 25 species. 13 species have Mediterranean<br />

origin. The Pontic type of elements and<br />

cosmopolitans are 5 species each of them. One of the<br />

species is adventive element. One of the species is<br />

Balkan suben<strong>de</strong>mite – Ornithogalum sibthorpii<br />

Greut.<br />

Three species are Tertiary relicts: Carpinus<br />

orientalis Mill., Quercus cerris L. and Ulmus minor<br />

Mill.<br />

Two species with protection statute are<br />

established – Crocus flavus West. and Scilla bifolia<br />

L. They are inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the Biological Diversity Act<br />

in the category „Un<strong>de</strong>r the protection and regulated<br />

use of nature”.<br />

The anthropophytes are 55 species (70.51%).<br />

The large number indicates for increased<br />

anthropogenic impact on the habitat.<br />

The anthropogenic influence consists in the<br />

following: 1. Forestry felling. 2. Artificial<br />

afforestation. 3. Grazing sheep, goats and cows. 4.<br />

Pollution by garbage from the shepherds and farm<br />

workers. 5. Arable land in the vicinity. 6. Improved<br />

access to the habitat by a system of paths and roads.<br />

7. Тourist pavilion with a fireplace. 8. Fountain with<br />

several troughs.<br />

HABITAT 2<br />

A habitat by Bon<strong>de</strong>v [4]: Shrub (Amygd<strong>ale</strong>ta<br />

nanae) and grass (Artemisieta albae, Agropyreta<br />

pectiniformae, Agropyreta brandzae, Brometa riparii<br />

etc.) steppe and xerothermal communities.<br />

It is located south of Karapelit village,<br />

municipality Dobrich. The territory is a part of Nature<br />

2000 (Protected area “Suha reka”). The average<br />

altitu<strong>de</strong> is 160 m. The exposure is in some parts<br />

south, while in others – west. The slope is variable<br />

35<br />

and reaches 30°. The area of the habitat is 400 dka.<br />

The soil type is Chernozems, and the soil subtype is<br />

haplic Chernozems. The bedrock is limestone. The<br />

cover of the shrub vegetation is less<br />

than 5% and the cover of the herbaceous vegetation is<br />

90%. More than 5% of the ground is <strong>de</strong>void of<br />

vegetation cover.<br />

In the habitat have been in<strong>de</strong>tified 83 species of<br />

vascular plants from 70 genera and 24 families. The<br />

families with greatest number of genera are as<br />

follows: Rosaceae – 10 (14.29%), Asteraceae – 7<br />

(10.00%), Lamiaceae – 7 (10.00%), Poaceae – 7<br />

(10.00%) and Apiaceae – 5 (7.14%). The families<br />

with greatest number of species are as follows:<br />

Rosaceae – 10 (12.05%), Lamiaceae – 10 (12.05%),<br />

Asteraceae – 9 (10.84%), Poaceae – 7 (8.43%),<br />

Apiaceae – 5 (6.02%), Caryophillaceae – 5 (6.02%)<br />

and Ranunculaceae – 5 (6.02%). The genera with<br />

greatest number of species are as follows: Euphorbia<br />

and Salvia – with 3 species each of them (3.61%).<br />

Stipa capillata L. (2а) is with the highest<br />

percentage of coverage. With the lowest percentage<br />

of coverage are Robinia pseudoacacia L. (1), Althaea<br />

cannabina L. (1), Prunus mah<strong>ale</strong>b L. (+), Carduus<br />

nutans L. (+), Pyrus pyraster Burgsd. (+), Ligustrum<br />

vulgare L. (r) and Malus sylvestris Mill. (r). From the<br />

neighboring shelter belt immigrated some tree<br />

species. The reason for this is the transference of<br />

fruits and seeds by birds and wind. Each of the<br />

remaining 75 species has coverage 2m.<br />

The distribution of species in biological type is<br />

as follows: The perennial herbaceous plants (p) are<br />

most – they are 48 species (57.83%). Secondly, are<br />

annual herbaceous plants (a) with 18 species<br />

(21.69%). The biennial herbaceous plants (b) and the<br />

trees have 4 species each of them (4.82%). The<br />

shrubs (sh) are 3 species (3.61%). The transition<br />

group of shrubs to trees (sh-t) and the transition group<br />

of annual to perennial herbaceous plants (a-р) have 2<br />

species each of them (2.41%). The transition groups<br />

of annual to biennial herbaceous plants (a-b) and of<br />

biennial to perennial herbaceous plants (b-р) have<br />

one species (1.20%) each of them.<br />

The most species are species with Mediterranean<br />

(23 species), European (22 species) and circumboreal<br />

origin (20 species). The Pontic type of elements are<br />

10 species. The cosmopolitans are 3 species. The<br />

Balkan en<strong>de</strong>mites are 2 species – Achillea clypeolata


A characteristic of mo<strong>de</strong>l habitatas in South Dobrudja /Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 33-44 (2010)<br />

Sibth. et Sm. and Salvia ringens Sibth. et Sm. One<br />

species is Balkan suben<strong>de</strong>mite – Dianthus pallens<br />

Sm. One species has adventive origin and one species<br />

has Alpine-Mediterranean.<br />

Four species with protection statute are<br />

established: Adonis vernalis L. is inclu<strong>de</strong>d in CITES<br />

and in the Or<strong>de</strong>r for special arrangements for the<br />

conservation and use of medicinal plants in the<br />

category “Collecting herbs is prohibited from the<br />

natural habitats”. Jurinea le<strong>de</strong>bourii Bunge is<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the IUCN Red List for Bulgaria in the<br />

category “Endangered”, in the Red book for Bulgaria<br />

in the category „Rare” and in the Biological Diversity<br />

Act in the category „Protected”. Two species are<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the Biological Diversity Act in the<br />

category „Un<strong>de</strong>r the protection and regulated use of<br />

nature”: Bupleurum affine Sadl. and Stipa capillata<br />

L.<br />

The anthropophytes are 53 species (63.86%).<br />

They are an indicator of the extent of human impact<br />

on habitat.<br />

The anthropogenic influence on the habitat due<br />

to the presence of: 1. Improved access to the habitat<br />

by a system roads. 2. Arable land in the vicinity. 3.<br />

The forest shelter belts in the vicinity.<br />

HABITAT 3<br />

A habitat by Bon<strong>de</strong>v [4]: Mesoxerothermal<br />

grass vegetation with a prev<strong>ale</strong>nce of Poa bulbosa L.,<br />

Lolium perenne L., Cynodon dactylon L., partly also<br />

Dichantium ischaemum (L.) Roberty and rarely<br />

Chrysopogon gryllus (L.) Tryn.<br />

It is located between Izvorovo and Krasen<br />

villages, municipality General Toshevo. The average<br />

altitu<strong>de</strong> is 180 m. The exposure is southwest. The<br />

slope is variable and reaches 30°. The area of the<br />

habitat is 2 000 dka. The soil type is Leptosols, and<br />

the soil subtype is rendzic Leptosols. The bedrock is<br />

limestone. The cover of the shrub vegetation is less<br />

than 5% and the cover of the herbaceous vegetation is<br />

80%. More than 15% of the ground is <strong>de</strong>void of<br />

vegetation cover.<br />

In the habitat have been in<strong>de</strong>tified 103 species of<br />

vascular plants from 84 genera and 32 families. The<br />

families with greatest number of genera are as<br />

follows: Asteraceae – 15 (14.56%), Poaceae – 12<br />

(14.29%), Lamiaceae – 10 (11.90%) and<br />

36<br />

Brassicaceae – 5 (5.95%). The families with greatest<br />

number of species are as follows: Poaceae – 14<br />

(13.59%), Lamiaceae – 13 (12.62%), Asteraceae – 12<br />

(11.65%), Brassicaceae – 5 (4.85%), Euphorbiaceae<br />

– 5 (4.85%) and Rubiaceae – 5 (4.85%). The genus<br />

Euphorbia is with greatest number of species – with 5<br />

species (4.85%).<br />

With the highest percentage of coverage are Poa<br />

pratensis L. (2b) and Elymus repens (L.) Gould. (2а).<br />

With the lowest percentage of coverage (1) is<br />

Carduus thoermeri Weinm. Each of the remaining<br />

100 species has coverage 2m.<br />

The distribution of species in biological type is<br />

as follows: The perennial herbaceous plants (p) are<br />

most – they are 53 species (51.46%). Secondly, are<br />

annual herbaceous plants (a) with 32 species<br />

(31.07%). The biennial herbaceous plants (b) are 10<br />

species (9.71%). The transition group of annual to<br />

biennial herbaceous plants (a-b) has 3 species<br />

(2.91%). The transition group of annual to perennial<br />

herbaceous plants (a-р) has 2 species (1.94%). The<br />

trees (t) are 2 species (1.94%) and the shrubs (sh) –<br />

one species (3.61%) only.<br />

The largest number of species (31) has<br />

circumboreal origin. Secondly, are European (27<br />

species) and Mediterranean type of elements (20<br />

species). The species with Pontic origin are 13. The<br />

cosmopolitans are 6 species. Three species are<br />

Balkan suben<strong>de</strong>mites – Ornithogalum sibthorpii<br />

Greut., Verbascum banaticum Schrad. and Carduus<br />

thoermeri Weinm. The adventive species are 2. One<br />

species has Alpine-Carpathian origin.<br />

Three species with protection statute are<br />

established: Artemisia pe<strong>de</strong>montana Balb. is inclu<strong>de</strong>d<br />

in IUCN Red List for Bulgaria in the category<br />

„Endangered”, in the Red book for Bulgaria in the<br />

category „Threatened with extinction” and in the<br />

Biological Diversity Act in the category „Protected”.<br />

Helichrysum arenarium (L.) Mornh. and Stipa<br />

capillata L. are inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the Biological Diversity<br />

Act in the category “Un<strong>de</strong>r the protection and<br />

regulated use of nature”. Helichrysum arenarium (L.)<br />

Mornh. is inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the Or<strong>de</strong>r for special<br />

arrangements for the conservation and use of<br />

medicinal plants in the category “Collecting herbs is<br />

prohibited from the natural habitats”.


Dimcho Zahariev / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 33-44 (2010)<br />

The anthropophytes are 80 species (77.67%).<br />

They show a significant anthropogenic impact on the<br />

habitat.<br />

The anthropogenic influence on the habitat due<br />

to the presence of: 1. Improved access to the habitat<br />

by a system roads. 2. Arable land in the vicinity. 3.<br />

Transmission line, passing through the territory. 4.<br />

Grazing sheep and goats. 5. Pollution by garbage<br />

from the two villages. 6. Artificial terracing of slopes.<br />

HABITAT 4<br />

A habitat by Nature 2000: Western Pontic<br />

Paeonian steppes<br />

It is located near Bejanovo village, municipality<br />

General Toshevo. The territory is a part of Nature<br />

2000 (Protected area “Kraimorska Dobrudja”). The<br />

average altitu<strong>de</strong> is 80 m. The exposure is northeast.<br />

The slope is low and reaches 5°. The area of the<br />

habitat is 650 dka. The soil type is Chernozems, and<br />

the soil subtype is calcaric Chernozems. The bedrock<br />

is limestone. The cover of the shrub vegetation is less<br />

than 5% and the cover of the herbaceous vegetation is<br />

70%. More than 25% of the ground is <strong>de</strong>void of<br />

vegetation cover.<br />

In the habitat have been in<strong>de</strong>tified 153 species of<br />

vascular plants from 116 genera and 36 families. It is<br />

the richest of plant species from the natural habitats.<br />

The families with greatest number of genera are as<br />

follows: Asteraceae – 13 (11.21%), Rosaceae – 12<br />

(10.34%), Lamiaceae – 11 (9.48%), Poaceae – 11<br />

(9.48%), Boraginaceae – 6 (5.17%), Brassicaceae – 6<br />

(5.17%), Fabaceae – 6 (5.17%), Apiaceae – 5<br />

(4.31%), Ranunculaceae – 5 (4.31%) and<br />

Scrophulariaceae – 5 (4.31%). The families with<br />

greatest number of species are as follows: Asteraceae<br />

– 18 (11.76%), Rosaceae – 17 (11.11%), Lamiaceae<br />

– 15 (9.80%), Poaceae – 14 (9.15%), Boraginaceae –<br />

8 (5.23%), Caryophyllaceae – 8 (5.23%), Fabaceae –<br />

7 (4.58%), Apiaceae – 6 (3.92%), Brassicaceae – 6<br />

(3.92%), Ranunculaceae – 6 (3.92%), Euphorbiaceae<br />

– 5 (3.27%), Rubiaceae – 5 (3.27%) and<br />

Scrophulariaceae – 5 (3.27%). The genera with<br />

greatest number of species are as follows: Euphorbia<br />

– with 5 species (3.27%), Cerastium, Potentilla,<br />

Prunus, Salvia and Silene – with 3 species each of<br />

them (1.96%).<br />

With the highest percentage of coverage (2b) are<br />

Festuca pseudovina Hack. ex Wiesd., Poa pratensis<br />

37<br />

L. and Stipa capillata L. With the cover 1 are 14<br />

species. With the lowest percentage of coverage are<br />

Malus dasyphylla Borkh. (+) and Cydonia oblonga<br />

Mill. (r). They are most likely carried by birds. Each<br />

of the remaining 134 species has coverage 2m.<br />

The distribution of species in biological type is<br />

as follows: The perennial herbaceous plants (p) are<br />

most – they are 88 species (57.52%). Secondly, are<br />

annual herbaceous plants (a) with 38 species<br />

(24.84%). The next is the transition group of annual<br />

to biennial herbaceous plants (a-b) with 7 species<br />

(4.58%). The trees (t) and the shrubs (sh) are 5<br />

species each of them (3.27%). The biennial<br />

herbaceous plants (b) are 4 species (2.61%). The<br />

transition groups of annual to perennial herbaceous<br />

plants (a-р), of biennial to perennial herbaceous<br />

plants (b-p) and of shrubs to trees (sh-t) have 2<br />

species each of them (1.31%).<br />

The largest number of species (39) has<br />

circumboreal origin. The next are species with<br />

Mediterranean and European type of elements – with<br />

37 species each of them. Thirdly, are the Pontic type<br />

of elements with 21 species. The cosmopolitan are 6<br />

species. Four of the species are Balkan en<strong>de</strong>mites –<br />

Achillea clypeolata Sibth. et Sm., Astragalus<br />

spruneri Boiss., Chamaecytisus jankae (Vel.) Rothm.<br />

and Potentilla emili-popii Nyar. Five of the species<br />

are Balkan suben<strong>de</strong>mites – Carduus thoermeri<br />

Weinm., Centaurea napulifera Roch., Dianthus<br />

pallens Sm., Ornithogalum sibthorpii Greut. and<br />

Thesium simplex Vel. The remaining 3 species have<br />

Alpine-Mediterranean, Oriental-Turanian and<br />

Pannonian-Pontic origin.<br />

Eight species with protection statute are<br />

established: Paeonia tenuifolia L. is inclu<strong>de</strong>d in<br />

Berne Convention, in Directive 92/43/ЕЕС and in the<br />

Biological Diversity Act in the category “Protected”.<br />

Potentilla emili-popii Nyar. is inclu<strong>de</strong>d in Berne<br />

Convention, in Directive 92/43/ЕЕС, in the<br />

Biological Diversity Act in the category „Declaration<br />

of protected areas to protect habitat for species by<br />

Directive 92/43/ЕEC” and in the category<br />

„Protected”. Adonis vernalis L. is inclu<strong>de</strong>d in CITES<br />

and in the Or<strong>de</strong>r for special arrangements for the<br />

conservation and use of medicinal plants in the<br />

category “Collecting herbs is prohibited from the<br />

natural habitats”. Artemisia pe<strong>de</strong>montana Balb. is<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>d in IUCN Red List for Bulgaria in the


A characteristic of mo<strong>de</strong>l habitatas in South Dobrudja /Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 33-44 (2010)<br />

category „Endangered”, in the Red book for Bulgaria<br />

in the category „Threatened with extinction” and in<br />

the Biological Diversity Act in the category<br />

„Protected”. Erodium hoefftianum C. A. Mey. is<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the Red book for Bulgaria in the category<br />

„Rare” and in IUCN Red List for Bulgaria in the<br />

category „Near Threatened”. Pulsatilla montana<br />

(Hoppe) Reichenb., Stipa capillata L. and Stipa<br />

lessingiana Trin. et Rupr. are inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the<br />

Biological Diversity Act in the category “Un<strong>de</strong>r the<br />

protection and regulated use of nature”.<br />

The anthropophytes are 92 species (60.13%),<br />

which indicates a high anthropogenic impact on the<br />

habitat.<br />

The anthropogenic influence on the habitat due<br />

to the presence of: 1. Improved access to the habitat<br />

by a system roads. 2. Arable land in the vicinity. 3.<br />

The forest shelter belts and artificial forest from<br />

Robinia pseudoacacia L. in the vicinity. 4. Grazing<br />

cows. 5. Disposal of soil in the vicinity.<br />

HABITAT 5<br />

A habitat by Nature 2000: Rupicolous<br />

calcareous or basophilic grasslands of the Alysso-<br />

Sedion albi.<br />

It is located between Onogur and Efreitor<br />

Bakalovo villages, municipality Krushari. The<br />

territory is a part of Nature 2000 (Protected area<br />

“Suha reka”). The average altitu<strong>de</strong> is 70 m. The<br />

exposure is south. The slope is variable and reaches<br />

40°. The area of the habitat is 30 dka. The soil type is<br />

Leptosols, and the soil subtype is rendzic Leptosols.<br />

The bedrock is limestone. The cover of the shrub<br />

vegetation is less than 5% and the cover of the<br />

herbaceous vegetation is 30%. More than 65% of the<br />

ground is <strong>de</strong>void of vegetation cover.<br />

In the habitat have been in<strong>de</strong>tified 46 species of<br />

vascular plants from 43 genera and 22 families. It is<br />

the most poor of plant species from the natural<br />

habitats. The families with greatest number of genera<br />

are as follows: Asteraceae – 7 (16.28%), Рoaceae – 5<br />

(11.63%), Lamiaceae and Apiaceae – with 4 species<br />

each of them (9.30%). The families with greatest<br />

number of species are as follows: Asteraceae – 8<br />

(17.39%), Lamiaceae and Poaceae – with 5 species<br />

each of them (10.87%). The genera with greatest<br />

number of species are as follows: Centaurea, Sedum<br />

and Teucrium – with 2 species each of them (4.35%).<br />

38<br />

With the highest percentage of coverage (2а) is<br />

Dichantium ischaemum (L.) Roberty. With the lowest<br />

percentage of coverage (+) are Gleditsia triacanthos<br />

L., Cornus sanguinea L. and Prunus spinosa L. Each<br />

of the remaining 42 species has coverage 2m.<br />

The perennial herbaceous plants (p) are most –<br />

they are 24 species (52.17%). Secondly, are annual<br />

herbaceous plants (a) with 8 species (17.39%). The<br />

shrubs are 6 species (13.04%). The biennial<br />

herbaceous plants (b) are 3 species (6.52%). The<br />

transition group of shrubs to trees (sh-t) has 2 species<br />

(4.35%). The trees (t), the transition groups of annual<br />

to biennial herbaceous plants (а-b) and of annual to<br />

perennial herbaceous plants (a-р) have one species<br />

(2.17%) each of them.<br />

The largest number of species (14) has<br />

Mediterranean origin. Secondly, are circumboreal<br />

type of elements with 11 species. The next are species<br />

with Pontic (9 species) and European origin (8<br />

species). The cosmopolitan are 3 species. One of the<br />

species is adventive element.<br />

Two species with protection statute are<br />

established: Stipa capillata L. is inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the<br />

Biological Diversity Act in the category „Un<strong>de</strong>r the<br />

protection and regulated use of nature”. Sedum acre<br />

L. is inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the Or<strong>de</strong>r for special arrangements<br />

for the conservation and use of medicinal plants in<br />

the category “Un<strong>de</strong>r a restrictive regime”.<br />

The anthropophytes are 32 species (69.57%).<br />

The high rate is due to human activities in adjacent<br />

areas of the habitat.<br />

The anthropogenic influence on the habitat due<br />

to the presence of: 1. Improved access to the habitat<br />

by a system roads. 2. Grazing cows in the bottom of<br />

the slope. 3. Arable land in the vicinity.<br />

HABITAT 6<br />

Forest shelter belt formed by Quercus cerris L.<br />

It is located between General Toshevo and<br />

Liuliakovo village, municipality General Toshevo.<br />

The average altitu<strong>de</strong> is 210 m. The exposure is west.<br />

The shelter belt is oriented in a southwest – northeast<br />

direction. The slope is low and reaches 5°. The area<br />

is 75 dka. The length of the shelter belt is 5 000 m,<br />

and the width – 15 m. The soil type is Chernozems,<br />

and the soil subtype is haplic Chernozems. The<br />

bedrock is limestone. The cover of the tree vegetation


Dimcho Zahariev / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 33-44 (2010)<br />

is 80%, the cover of the shrub vegetation is 10% and<br />

the cover of the herbaceous vegetation is 60%.<br />

In the shelter belt have been in<strong>de</strong>tified 49 species<br />

of vascular plants from 44 genera and 21 families.<br />

The families with greatest number of genera are as<br />

follows: Asteraceae and Рoaceae – with 8 species<br />

each of them (18.18%), Rosaceae – 6 (13.64%) and<br />

Lamiaceae – 4 (9.09%). The families with greatest<br />

number of species are as follows: Asteraceae and<br />

Рoaceae – with 8 species each of them (16.33%),<br />

Rosaceae – 6 (12.24%) and Lamiaceae – 4 (8.16%).<br />

The genera with greatest number of species are as<br />

follows: Avenula, Cirsium, Galium, Prunus and<br />

Sambucus – with 2 species each of them (4.08%).<br />

With the highest percentage of coverage (5) are<br />

Quercus cerris L. and Poa pratensis L. (3). With<br />

coverage 2b are Avenula compressa (Heuff.) Sauer et<br />

Chmelit., Avenula pubescens (Huds.) Dumort. and<br />

Lolium perenne L. With coverage 2a are Robinia<br />

pseudoacacia L. and Hor<strong>de</strong>um hystrix Roth. With the<br />

lowest percentage of coverage (+) are Crataegus<br />

monogyna Jacq., Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. and<br />

Euphorbia agraria Bieb. Only with one individual (r)<br />

is Celtis australis L. Each of the remaining 38 species<br />

has coverage 2m.<br />

The perennial herbaceous plants (p) are most –<br />

they are 34 species (69.39%). Secondly, are annual<br />

herbaceous plants (a) with 10 species (20.41%).<br />

Thirdly, are the shrubs (sh) with 5 species (10.20%).<br />

The trees (t) are 4 species (8.16%). The transition<br />

group of shrubs to trees (sh-t) has 3 species (6.12%).<br />

The biennial herbaceous plants (b) are 2 species<br />

(4.08%). The transition group of annual to biennial<br />

herbaceous plants (а-b) has 1 species (2.04%) only.<br />

The largest number of species (20) has<br />

circumboreal origin. Secondly, are species with<br />

European (11) and Mediterranean origin (10). The<br />

cosmopolitan are 3 species. Two of the species are<br />

adventive elements. One of the species has Pontic<br />

origin. One of the species is Balkan suben<strong>de</strong>mite –<br />

Galium pseudoaristatum Schur.<br />

One species is Tertiary relict in all of the habitat<br />

– Quercus cerris L. It is woo<strong>de</strong>d artificial for the<br />

creation of the shelter belt.<br />

There are no species of protection status. This<br />

can be explained easily by the artificial origin of the<br />

habitat.<br />

39<br />

The anthropophytes are 38 species (77.55%).<br />

The high number is due to the artificial origin of the<br />

habitat and adjacent to farmland.<br />

The anthropogenic influence due to the presence<br />

of: 1. Improved access to the habitat by a system<br />

roads. 2. Grazing goats and cows. 3. Pollution by<br />

garbage from the shepherds and farm workers. 4.<br />

Arable land in the vicinity.<br />

L.<br />

HABITAT 7<br />

Forest shelter belt formed by Fraxinus excelsior<br />

It is located near Chernookovo village,<br />

municipality General Toshevo. The average altitu<strong>de</strong><br />

is 160 m. The exposure is east. The shelter belt is<br />

oriented in a southwest – northeast direction. The<br />

slope is low and reaches 5°. The area is 31.5 dka. The<br />

length of the shelter belt is 2 100 m, the width – 15<br />

m, and the height – 15 m. The soil type is<br />

Chernozems, and the soil subtype is haplic<br />

Chernozems. The bedrock is limestone. The cover of<br />

the tree vegetation is 80%, the cover of the shrub<br />

vegetation is 10% and the cover of the herbaceous<br />

vegetation is 60%.<br />

In the shelter belt have been in<strong>de</strong>tified 59 species<br />

of vascular plants from 50 genera and 19 families.<br />

The families with greatest number of genera are as<br />

follows: Asteraceae – 11 (22.00%), Рosaceae – 6<br />

(12.00%) and Rosaceae – 6 (12.00%). The families<br />

with greatest number of species are as follows:<br />

Asteraceae – 14 (23.73%), Рosaceae – 8 (13.56%)<br />

and Rosaceae – 6 (10.17%). The genera with greatest<br />

number of species are as follows: Chenopodium and<br />

Fraxinus – with 3 species each of them (5.08%);<br />

Artemisia, Bromus, Carduus, Centaurea, Consolida<br />

and Hor<strong>de</strong>um – with 2 species each of them (3.39%).<br />

With the highest percentage of coverage (5) is<br />

Fraxinus excelsior L., followed by Poa pratensis L.<br />

(2а). With the lowest percentage of coverage (+) are<br />

Amorpha fruticosa L. and Elaeagnus angustifolia L.<br />

Only with one individual (r) is Salvia argentea L.<br />

With the cover 1 are 4 species. Each of the remaining<br />

50 species has coverage 2m.<br />

The perennial herbaceous plants (p) are most –<br />

they are 22 species (37.29%). Secondly, are annual<br />

herbaceous plants (a) with 16 species (27.12%).<br />

Thirdly, are the trees (t) with 7 species (11.86%). The


A characteristic of mo<strong>de</strong>l habitatas in South Dobrudja /Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 33-44 (2010)<br />

shrubs (sh), the biennial herbaceous plants (b) and the<br />

transition group of annual to biennial herbaceous<br />

plants (а-b) have 4 species each of them (6.78%). The<br />

transition group of shrubs to trees (sh-t) has 2 species<br />

(3.39%).<br />

The largest number of species (23) has<br />

circumboreal origin. Secondly, are species with<br />

European (13) and Mediterranean origin (8). The<br />

cosmopolitan are 6 species. Five of the species have<br />

Pontic origin. Four of the species are adventive<br />

elements.<br />

Four species in the habitat are Tertiary relicts:<br />

Acer tataricum L., Cotinus coggygria Scop.,<br />

Fraxinus excelsior L., Quercus cerris L. The main<br />

species is Fraxinus excelsior L. It is woo<strong>de</strong>d artificial<br />

for the creation of the shelter belt. Acer tataricum L.<br />

and Cotinus coggygria Scop. have less than 5%<br />

coverage and their number is more than 50<br />

individuals. The number of the individuals from<br />

Quercus cerris L. is less than 50. Perhaps individuals<br />

of these three species have evolved from fruit, carried<br />

over from adjacent areas.<br />

One species with protection statute is established<br />

– Fraxinus pallisiae Wilmott. It is inclu<strong>de</strong>d in IUCN<br />

Red List for Bulgaria in the category „Vulnerable”. It<br />

has less than 5% coverage, and its number is more<br />

than 50 individuals. The most likely reason for its<br />

presence in the shelter belt is its planting together<br />

with basic species Fraxinus excelsior L.<br />

The anthropophytes are 51 species (86.44%).<br />

Extremely high number of them due to the artificial<br />

origin of the habitat and adjacent to farmland.<br />

The anthropogenic influence due to the presence<br />

of: 1. Improved access to the habitat by a system<br />

roads. 2. Pollution by garbage from the shepherds and<br />

farm workers. 3. Arable land in the vicinity.<br />

HABITAT 8<br />

Forest shelter belt formed by Fraxinus oxycarpa<br />

Willd.<br />

It is located as a third shelter belt between<br />

Vladimirovo and Benkovski villages, municipality<br />

Dobrich. The average altitu<strong>de</strong> is 230 m. The exposure<br />

is northeast. The shelter belt is oriented in a<br />

southwest – northeast direction. The slope is low and<br />

reaches 5°. The area is 17 dka. The length of the<br />

shelter belt is 1 150 m, the width – 15 m, and the<br />

height – 15 m. The soil type is Vertisols, and the soil<br />

40<br />

subtype is eutric Vertisols. The bedrock is limestone.<br />

The cover of the tree vegetation is 80%, the cover of<br />

the shrub vegetation is 10% and the cover of the<br />

herbaceous vegetation is 60%.<br />

In the shelter belt have been in<strong>de</strong>tified 55 species<br />

of vascular plants from 47 genera and 21 families.<br />

The families with greatest number of genera are as<br />

follows: Asteraceae – 9 (19.15%), Rosaceae – 8<br />

(17.02%) and Рosaceae – 6 (12.77%). The families<br />

with greatest number of species are as follows:<br />

Asteraceae – 10 (18.18%), Rosaceae – 10 (18.18%)<br />

and Рosaceae – 7 (12.73%). The genera with greatest<br />

number of species are as follows: Acer and Prunus –<br />

with 3 species each of them (5.45%).<br />

With the highest percentage of coverage (4) is<br />

Fraxinus oxycarpa Willd. With the lowest percentage<br />

of coverage (1) are Amorpha fruticosa L., Tilia<br />

cordata Mill. and Tilia tomentosa Moench. Each of<br />

the remaining 51 species has coverage 2m.<br />

The perennial herbaceous plants (p) are most –<br />

they are 22 species (40.00%). Secondly, are annual<br />

herbaceous plants (a) with 11 species (20.00%).<br />

Thirdly, are the trees (t) with 9 species (16.36%). The<br />

shrubs (sh) and the transition group of shrubs to trees<br />

(sh-t) have 4 species each of them (7.27%). The next<br />

is the transition group of annual to biennial<br />

herbaceous plants (a-b) with 2 species (3.64%). The<br />

biennial herbaceous plants (b), the transition groups<br />

of annual to perennial herbaceous plants (а-р) and of<br />

biennual to perennial herbaceous plants (b-р) are<br />

presented with one species (1.82%) only.<br />

The largest number of species (25) has circumboreal<br />

origin. Secondly, are species with European<br />

(13) and Mediterranean origin (7). The cosmopolitan<br />

are 4 species. Three of the species have Pontic origin.<br />

Three of the species are adventive elements.<br />

Three species in the habitat are Tertiary relicts:<br />

Acer campestre L., Acer tataricum L., Quercus cerris<br />

L. Each of them has less than 5% coverage and their<br />

number is more than 50 individuals. The reason for<br />

their presence can be traced in the transference of<br />

fruit from neighboring areas.<br />

There are no species of protection status. This<br />

can be explained easily by the artificial origin of the<br />

habitat.


Dimcho Zahariev / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 33-44 (2010)<br />

The anthropophytes are 45 species (81.82%).<br />

The high number is due to the artificial origin of the<br />

habitat and adjacent to farmland.<br />

The anthropogenic influence due to the presence<br />

of: 1. Improved access to the habitat by a system<br />

roads. 2. Pollution by garbage. 3. Arable land in the<br />

vicinity.<br />

HABITAT 9<br />

Forest shelter belt formed by Gleditsia<br />

triacanthos L.<br />

It is located south of Karapelit village,<br />

municipality Dobrich. The average altitu<strong>de</strong> is 175 m.<br />

The exposure is northeast. The shelter belt is oriented<br />

in a north – south direction. The slope is low and<br />

reaches 10°. The area is 15 dka. The length of the<br />

shelter belt is 1 000 m, the width – 15 m, and the<br />

height – 15 m. The soil type is Chernozems, and the<br />

soil subtype is haplic Chernozems. The bedrock is<br />

limestone. The cover of the tree vegetation is 60%,<br />

the cover of the shrub vegetation is 10% and the<br />

cover of the herbaceous vegetation is 70%.<br />

In the shelter belt have been in<strong>de</strong>tified 88 species<br />

of vascular plants from 78 genera and 30 families. It<br />

is the richest of plant species from the shelter belts.<br />

The reason for this is that is located immediately<br />

adjacent steppe. From the steppe to the shelter belt<br />

migrated a large number of species. The families with<br />

greatest number of genera are as follows: Lamiaceae<br />

– 11 (14.10%), Fabaceae – 9 (11.54%), Rosaceae – 8<br />

(10.26%), Asteraceae – 7 (8.97%), Poaceae – 6<br />

(7.69%) and Apiaceae – 5 (6.41%). The families with<br />

greatest number of species are as follows: Lamiaceae<br />

– 13 (14.77%), Rosaceae – 11 (12.50%), Asteraceae<br />

– 9 (10.23%), Fabaceae – 9 (10.23%), Poaceae – 6<br />

(6.82%) and Apiaceae – 5 (5.68%). The genus with<br />

greatest number of species is Prunus – with 4 species<br />

(4.55%).<br />

With the highest percentage of coverage (4) is<br />

Gleditsia triacanthos L. Secondly, it is Poa pratensis<br />

L. (2а). With the cover 1 are 23 species. With the<br />

lowest percentage of coverage are Carduus<br />

acanthoi<strong>de</strong>s L., Sanguisorba minor Scop. (+) and<br />

Verbascum ovalifolium Sms. (r). Each of the<br />

remaining 60 species has coverage 2m.<br />

The perennial herbaceous plants (p) are most –<br />

they are 42 species (47.73%). Secondly, are annual<br />

herbaceous plants (a) with 16 species (18.18%).<br />

41<br />

Thirdly, are the trees (t) and the shrubs (sh) with 9<br />

species (10.23%) each of them. The next are the<br />

transition group of shrubs to trees (sh-t) and the<br />

biennial herbaceous plants (b) with 4 species each of<br />

them (4.55%). The transition group of annual to<br />

perennial herbaceous plants (а-р) has 2 species<br />

(2.27%). The transition groups of annual to biennial<br />

herbaceous plants (а-b) and of biennual to perennial<br />

herbaceous plants (b-р) are presented with one<br />

species (1.14%).<br />

The largest number of species (28) has<br />

circumboreal origin. Secondly, are species with<br />

Mediterranean origin (21). The next are species with<br />

European (14) and Pontic origin (12). Six of the<br />

species is adventive element. The cosmopolitan are 5<br />

species. One of the species has Oriental-Turanian<br />

origin. One of the species is Balkan en<strong>de</strong>mite –<br />

Achillea clypeolata Sibth. et Sm.<br />

Three species are Tertiary relicts: Celtis australis<br />

L., Cotinus coggygria Scop., Ulmus minor Mill. Each<br />

of them has less than 5% coverage. The number of<br />

Celtis australis L. is less than 50 individuals. The<br />

number of another two species is more than 50<br />

individuals. The reason for their presence can be<br />

traced in the transference of fruit from neighboring<br />

areas.<br />

Four species with protection statute are<br />

established: Adonis vernalis L. is inclu<strong>de</strong>d in CITES<br />

and in the Or<strong>de</strong>r for special arrangements for the<br />

conservation and use of medicinal plants in the<br />

category “Collecting herbs is prohibited from the<br />

natural habitats”. Jurinea le<strong>de</strong>bourii Bunge is<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the IUCN Red List for Bulgaria in the<br />

category “Endangered”, in the Red book for Bulgaria<br />

in the category „rare” and in the Biological Diversity<br />

Act in the category „protected”. Tilia rubra DC. is<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>d in IUCN Red List for Bulgaria in the<br />

category „Least Concern” and in the Red book for<br />

Bulgaria in category “Rare”. Asparagus officinalis L.<br />

is inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the the Biological Diversity Act in the<br />

category „Un<strong>de</strong>r the protection and regulated use of<br />

nature”.<br />

The presence of Adonis vernalis L. and Jurinea<br />

le<strong>de</strong>bourii Bunge is associated with their migration<br />

from the nearby steppe region.


A characteristic of mo<strong>de</strong>l habitatas in South Dobrudja /Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 33-44 (2010)<br />

The anthropophytes are 65 species (73.86%).<br />

The high number is due to the artificial origin of the<br />

habitat and adjacent to farmland.<br />

The anthropogenic influence due to the presence<br />

of: 1. Improved access to the habitat by a system<br />

roads. 2. Pollution by garbage from the shepherds and<br />

farm workers. 3. Arable land in the vicinity.<br />

HABITAT 10<br />

Forest shelter belt formed by Robinia<br />

pseudoacacia L.<br />

It is located as a first shelter belt east of the<br />

highway between Durankulak village and Durankulak<br />

Checkpoint, municipality Shabla. The average<br />

altitu<strong>de</strong> is 20 m. The first half of the shelter belt is<br />

oriented in a west – east direction. The second half of<br />

the shelter belt is oriented in a northwest – southeast<br />

direction. The territory has no inclination. The area is<br />

15 dka. The length of the shelter belt is 1 000 m, the<br />

width – 15 m, and the height – 7 m. The soil type is<br />

Leptosols, and the soil subtype is rendzic Leptosols.<br />

The bedrock is limestone. The cover of<br />

the tree vegetation is 60%, the cover of the shrub<br />

vegetation is 10% and the cover of the herbaceous<br />

vegetation is 80%.<br />

In the shelter belt have been in<strong>de</strong>tified 48 species<br />

of vascular plants from 40 genera and 19 families. It<br />

is the most poor of plant species from the shelter<br />

belts. The families with greatest number of genera are<br />

as follows: Asteraceae – 9 (22.50%) and Рosaceae –<br />

5 (12.50%). The families with greatest number of<br />

species are as follows: Asteraceae – 10 (20.83%),<br />

Рosaceae – 7 (14.58%) and Rosaceae – 6 (12.50%).<br />

The genera with greatest number of species are as<br />

follows: Prunus – 3 (6.25%), Artemisia, Elymus,<br />

Euphorbia, Fraxinus, Galium, Lamium and Poa –<br />

with 2 species each of them (4.17%).<br />

With the highest percentage of coverage (4) is<br />

Robinia pseudoacacia L., followed by species<br />

Elymus repens (L.) Gould. and Elymus hispidus<br />

(Opiz) Meld. (3) and Poa pratensis L. (2а). With the<br />

lowest percentage of coverage (1) are 16 species.<br />

Each of the remaining 28 species has coverage 2m.<br />

The perennial herbaceous plants (p) are most –<br />

they are 19 species (39.58%). Secondly, are annual<br />

herbaceous plants (a) with 9 species (18.75%).<br />

Thirdly, are the trees (t) with 6 species (12.50%). The<br />

next are the shrubs (sh) and the transition group of<br />

42<br />

shrubs to trees (sh-t) with 4 species each of them<br />

(8.33%). The transition group of annual to biennial<br />

herbaceous plants (а-b) has 3 species (6.25%). The<br />

biennial herbaceous plants (b) are 2 species (4.17%).<br />

The transition group of biennual to perennial<br />

herbaceous plants (b-р) has one species (2.08%) only.<br />

The largest number of species (19) has<br />

circumboreal origin. Secondly, are species with<br />

Mediterranean origin (10). The next are species with<br />

european origin – they are 7 species. The<br />

cosmopolitan are 4 species. Three species have<br />

Pontic origin. Three of the species are adventive<br />

elements. One of the species has Oriental-Turanian<br />

origin. One of the species is Balkan suben<strong>de</strong>mite –<br />

Carduus candicans Waldst. et Kit.<br />

In the habitat is meeting once Tertiary relict –<br />

Fraxinus excelsior L. Its coverage is less than 5%.<br />

The number of individuals is in the range 6 – 50. The<br />

reason for its presence can be traced in the<br />

transference of fruit from neighboring areas.<br />

One species with protection statute is established<br />

– Artemisia pe<strong>de</strong>montana Balb. It is inclu<strong>de</strong>d in<br />

IUCN Red List for Bulgaria in the category<br />

„Endangered”, in the Red book for Bulgaria in the<br />

category „Threatened with extinction” and in the<br />

Biological Diversity Act in the category „Protected”.<br />

Its presence can be explained by the transfer of the<br />

fruits by wind and finding favorable conditions,<br />

associated with good light in the shelter belt.<br />

The anthropophytes are 42 species (87.50%).<br />

Extremely high number of them due to the artificial<br />

origin of the habitat and adjacent to farmland.<br />

The anthropogenic influence due to the presence<br />

of: 1. Improved access to the habitat by a system<br />

roads. 2. Arable land in the vicinity.<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

From natural habitats are established most<br />

taxonomical diversity in Western Pontic Paeonian<br />

steppes near to Bejanovo village, and least<br />

taxonomical diversity in Rupicolous calcareous or<br />

basophilic grasslands of the Alysso-Sedion albi<br />

between Onogur and Efreitor Bakalovo villages.<br />

From forest shelter belts are established most<br />

taxonomical diversity in Forest shelter belt formed by<br />

Gleditsia triacanthos L., and least taxonomical<br />

diversity in Forest shelter belt formed by Robinia


Dimcho Zahariev / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 33-44 (2010)<br />

pseudoacacia L. between Durankulak village and<br />

Durankulak Checkpoint.<br />

The families with greatest number of genera and<br />

species are as follows: Asteraceae, Рoaceae,<br />

Rosaceae and Lamiaceae.<br />

In the analysis of the biological types was<br />

established pattern common to all habitats: most<br />

numerous are perennial and annual herbaceous plants.<br />

This confirms the results of research of Kozuharov et<br />

all. [33].<br />

In all habitats are most floristic elements with<br />

circumboreal, European and Mediterranean origin.<br />

The Tertiary relicts, which are established, are<br />

trees and one shrub. They often have a secondary<br />

origin for the habitats.<br />

The species with protection statute in natural<br />

habitats are most in Western Pontic Paeonian steppes<br />

near to Bejanovo village – they are 8 species. In the<br />

other habitats that number varies from 2 to 4 species.<br />

In the forest shelter belts can be found a small<br />

number of species with protection statute. Most often<br />

they have gone from adjacent areas.<br />

The number of anthropophytes in the natural<br />

habitats is a significant – from 60.13% to 77.67%.<br />

The reasons about this are mainly the following: the<br />

strong fragmentation of natural habitats, arable land<br />

in the vicinity – like source of anthropophytes,<br />

improved access to the habitats and their accessibility<br />

for people and domestic animals. In the forest shelter<br />

belts the anthropophytes quite naturally are more –<br />

from 73.86% to 87.50%.<br />

5. References<br />

[1] VELEV, S., 2002. Climatic zoning, in Kopr<strong>ale</strong>v,<br />

I. (main ed.). Geography of Bulgaria. Physical<br />

and socio-economic geography, Institute of<br />

Geography, BAS, Farkom, Sofia, 760 pp.<br />

[2] NINOV, N., 2002. Soils, in Kopr<strong>ale</strong>v, I. (main<br />

ed.). Geography of Bulgaria. Physical and socioeconomic<br />

geography, Institute of Geography,<br />

BAS, Farkom, Sofia, 760 pp.<br />

[3] KITANOV, B., Penev, I., 1980. Flora of<br />

Dobrudja, Nauka i Izkustvo, Sofia, 630 pp.<br />

[4] BONDEV, I., 1991. The vegetation of Bulgaria.<br />

Map in М 1:600 000 with explanatory text,<br />

University Press St. Kliment Ohridski, Sofia, 183<br />

pp.<br />

43<br />

[5] NATURA 2000 Standard Data Form for<br />

Protected Area „The Valley of Batova River”<br />

(BG0000102), Ministry of Environment and<br />

Waters of Bulgaria, 15 pp.<br />

[6] NATURA 2000 Standard Data Form for<br />

Protected Area „Kraimorska Dobrudja”<br />

(BG0000130), Ministry of Environment and<br />

Waters of Bulgaria, 19 pp.<br />

[7] NATURA 2000 Standard Data Form for<br />

Protected Area „Durankulak Lake”<br />

(BG0000154), Ministry of Environment and<br />

Waters of Bulgaria, 13 pp.<br />

[8] NATURA 2000 Standard Data Form for<br />

Protected Area „Shabla – Ezeretz Lake”<br />

(BG0000156), Ministry of Environment and<br />

Waters of Bulgaria, 16 pp.<br />

[9] NATURA 2000 Standard Data Form for<br />

Protected Area „Suha reka” (BG0002048),<br />

Ministry of Environment and Waters of Bulgaria,<br />

13 pp.<br />

[10] NATURA 2000 Standard Data Form for<br />

Protected Area „Kardam” (BG0000569), Ministry<br />

of Environment and Waters of Bulgaria, 10.<br />

[11] NATURA 2000 Standard Data Form for<br />

Protected Area „Izvorovo – Kraishte”<br />

(BG0000570), Ministry of Environment and Waters<br />

of Bulgaria, 10 pp.<br />

[12] NATURA 2000 Standard Data Form for<br />

Protected Area „Rositza – Loznitza”<br />

(BG0000572), Ministry of Environment and<br />

Waters of Bulgaria, 12 pp.<br />

[13] NATURA 2000 Standard Data Form for<br />

Protected Area „Complex „Kaliakra”<br />

(BG0000573), Ministry of Environment and<br />

Waters of Bulgaria, 27 pp.<br />

[14] TZONEV, R., Rusakova, V., Dimitrov, М.<br />

Dimova, D., Belev, T. Kavrakova, V., 2004.<br />

Proposals for habitats for inclusion to Annex I on<br />

Council Directive 92/43/EEC of the European<br />

Community to protect natural habitats and of<br />

wild fauna and flora and Interpretation handbook<br />

of habitats in the European Union EUR 15/2,<br />

Report, World Wildlife Fund, Danube –<br />

Carpathian Program (WWF, DCP).<br />

[15] KAVRAKOVA, V., Dimova, D., Dimitrov, М.,<br />

Tzonev, R., Belev, T. (editors), 2005. A<br />

guidance for i<strong>de</strong>ntifying the habitats of European<br />

importance in Bulgaria, Geosoft, Sofia, 128.


A characteristic of mo<strong>de</strong>l habitatas in South Dobrudja /Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 33-44 (2010)<br />

[16] KOZUHAROV, S. (ed.), 1992. I<strong>de</strong>ntifier of the<br />

vascular plants in Bulgatia, Nauka i izkustvo,<br />

Sofia, 788 pp.<br />

[17] Flora of PR Bulgaria, Vol. І-Х, 1963-1995,<br />

Publishing House of BAS, Sofia.<br />

[18] CHASE, M. (corresponding author), 2003. An<br />

update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group<br />

classification for the or<strong>de</strong>rs and families of<br />

flowering plants: APG II, The Linnean Society of<br />

London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean<br />

Society, 141: 399–436.<br />

[19] PETROVA, А., Anchev, М. Palamarev, Е.,<br />

1999. How to recognize the plants in our nature.<br />

Char i<strong>de</strong>ntifier. Prosveta, Sofia, 837 pp.<br />

[20] WESTHOFF, V., Maarel, E., 1973. The Braun-<br />

Blanquet Approach in: Tuxen, R. (Ed.),<br />

Handbook of vegetation science. Dr. W. Junk b.<br />

v. Publishers the Hague, p. 619-704.<br />

[21] ASIOV B., Petrova A., Dimitrov D., Vasilev R.,<br />

2006. Conspectus of the Bulgarian vascular flora.<br />

Distribution maps and floristic elements,<br />

Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation, Sofia, 452 p.<br />

[22] GRUEV, B., Kuzmanov B., 1994. General<br />

biogeography, University Press St. Kliment<br />

Ohridski, Sofia, 498 pp.<br />

[23] PEEV, D., 2001. National park Rila.<br />

Management plan 2001 – 2010. Adopted by<br />

Resolution №522 of Council of Ministers on<br />

04.07.2001, Sofia, 338 pp.<br />

[24] BOŽA, P., Anačkov G., Igić R., Vukov D., Polić<br />

D., 2005. Flora “Rimskog šanca” (Vojvodina,<br />

Srbija), 8th Symposium on the flora of<br />

Southeastern Serbia and Neighbouring Regions,<br />

Niš, 20-24.06.2005, Abstracts, рр. 55.<br />

[25] PEEV, D., Kozuharov S., Anchev M., Petrova<br />

A., Ivanova D., Tzoneva S., 1998. Biodiversity<br />

of Vascular Plants in Bulgaria, In: Curt Meine<br />

(ed.), Bulgaria's Biological Diversity:<br />

Conservation Status and Needs Assessment,<br />

Volumes I and II, Washington, D.C.,<br />

Biodiversity Support Program, pp. 55–88.<br />

[26] Council Directive 92/43/EEC of the European<br />

Community to protect natural habitats and of<br />

wild fauna and flora.<br />

[27] Biological Diversity Act, State Gazette number<br />

77 from 9 august 2002, pp. 9–42. Amen<strong>de</strong>d in<br />

State Gazette number 94 from 16.11.2007.<br />

44<br />

[28] Convention on International Tra<strong>de</strong> in<br />

Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora,<br />

State Gazette number 6 from 21 Januari 1992.<br />

[29] Red book of PR Bulgaria, Vol. 1, Plants, 1984,<br />

Publishing House of BAS, Sofia, 447 pp.<br />

[30] PETROVA А., Vladimirov V. (eds.), 2009. Red<br />

List of Bulgarian vascular plants, Phytologia<br />

Balcanica 15 (1): 63–94.<br />

[31] Or<strong>de</strong>r number RD-72 from 3 februari 2006 for<br />

special arrangements for the conservation and<br />

use of medicinal plants, State Gazette number 16<br />

from 21 Februari 2006.<br />

[32] STEFANOV, B., Kitanov B., 1962. Kultigenen<br />

plants and kultigenen vegetation in Bulgaria,<br />

Publishing House of BAS, Sofia, 275 pp.<br />

[33] KOZUHAROV, S., Dimitrov, D., Lazarova, М.,<br />

Kozuharova, Е., 1997. A characteristic of the<br />

flora and the vegetation of the natural plant<br />

complexes in Southern Dobrudja, Conference<br />

proceedings „Dobrudja and Kaliakra”, Aca<strong>de</strong>mic<br />

publishing of Higher Agricultural Institute,<br />

Plovdiv, p. 42-58.


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

FLORISTIC ASPECTS OF THE HILLS OF CAMENA VILLAGE<br />

(TULCEA COUNTY)<br />

Marius FĂGĂRAŞ<br />

Ovidius University of Constanţa, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Department of Biology and<br />

Ecology, Mamaia Blvd, No. 124, 900527, Constanţa, Romania, fagarasm@yahoo.com<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: This paper presents the flora on the hills in the vicinity of Camena locality. These hills have volcanic<br />

origin and are located in the south-east of the Babadag plateau. The hilly landscape with spectacular rock<br />

formations, the substrate ma<strong>de</strong> up of acidic volcanites and the climate specific to the forest steppe are the main<br />

factors that <strong>de</strong>termined the variety of the vegetation ma<strong>de</strong> up of steppe meadows, rock formations, forests and<br />

bushes. The area is characterized by the presence of a consi<strong>de</strong>rable number of floral rarities, some en<strong>de</strong>mic,<br />

other rare, vulnerable or endangered at national level. Despite all these, the flora of the area is still little known<br />

as there are no specialized papers. The enumeration of the vascular flora is accompanied by an analysis of the<br />

biological forms, of the floral elements, of the ecological categories, but also of the floral rarities present on<br />

these hills.<br />

Keywords: Camena hills, flora, life forms, floristic elements, ecological categories, rare and threatened flora.<br />

___________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The hills of Camena are located south of<br />

Ciucurovei Hills, in the south-east of the Babadag<br />

Plateau, in the vicinity of Camena village (Tulcea<br />

County). They are volcanic hills (Fig. 7), with a<br />

maximum altitu<strong>de</strong> of approx. 190 meters, located at<br />

the southern end of the Peceneaga-Camena crevice<br />

which separates the Northern Dobrogea Plateau<br />

from the Central Dobrogea Plateau. The Hills of<br />

Camena look like a wi<strong>de</strong> saddle framed towards the<br />

north-west and south-east by the hydrographic<br />

basins of two valleys: Camena valley and Ciamurlia<br />

valley. In the southern part of these hills is the<br />

Altan Tepe copper pyrite mine.<br />

The geological layer is ma<strong>de</strong> up of rhyolites<br />

(quartz porphyry) of P<strong>ale</strong>ozoic age, volcanic rocks<br />

(acid volcanites) colored in pink-red, reddish-brown<br />

and violet. In the plane zone and on the ero<strong>de</strong>d<br />

inclines, the rhyolites emerge on the surface as<br />

spectacular rock formations. Towards the base of<br />

the hills, the rocks are covered by a layer of loess<br />

(3-4 meters thick). The soils are represented by<br />

chernozem and lithosoils, the latter being present<br />

especially in the rocky zones.<br />

The climate is temperate-continental, with<br />

average annual temperatures of 10.5-11 0 C, while<br />

the average annual precipitations range between<br />

450 and 500 mm/year. As vegetation type, the Hills<br />

of Camena fit within the forest steppe zone. The<br />

vegetation is ma<strong>de</strong> up of steppe meadows, rock<br />

vegetation (on the plateaus), thermophile forests<br />

and bushes.<br />

The Hills of Camena represent an area of the<br />

Babadag Plateau which is interesting from the<br />

geological, landscape and botanical point of view,<br />

firstly because of the volcanic origin of the hills, of<br />

the rhyolites disposed as spectacular rock<br />

formations and of the floral rarities which can be<br />

encountered in this area. Despite these, the flora of<br />

these hills is little known and limited to the<br />

quotation of species in ol<strong>de</strong>r specialized literature<br />

[1, 2, 3, 4, 5].<br />

2. Material and Methods<br />

The field researches have been done between<br />

years 2008-2010, during the entire vegetation<br />

season in or<strong>de</strong>r to cover all the phenology stages.<br />

The plant taxa nomenclature follows the Flora<br />

ilustrată a României. Pteridophyta et<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


Floristic aspects of the Hills of Camena village / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 45-54 (2010)<br />

Spermatophyta [6], Flora Europaea [7, 8] and<br />

Flora României [4]. The life forms, floristic<br />

elements and ecological categories have been<br />

established on the base of the synthesis works<br />

Conspectul florei cormofitelor spontane din<br />

România [9] and Flora ilustrată a României.<br />

Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta [6]. The rare and<br />

threatened plant species was done according to the<br />

Romanian Red List [10] and the Romanian Red<br />

Book of the vascular plants [11].<br />

3. Results and Discussions<br />

The floristic researches carried out on the hills<br />

of Camena village have lead to i<strong>de</strong>ntification of 178<br />

vascular taxa (168 species and 10 subspecies)<br />

(Table 1). Taxa found in the studied area belong to<br />

46 families and 38 classes of Spermatophyta<br />

Divisio. The following families are well<br />

represented as number of taxa (Fig. 1): Asteraceae<br />

(12,35%), Lamiaceae (10,67%), Poaceae (9,55%),<br />

Rosaceae si Brassicaceae (5,05%), Liliaceae,<br />

Caryophyllaceae si Fabaceae (cate 4,49%),<br />

Apiaceae (3,93%), Boraginaceae (3,37%),<br />

Ranunculaceae (2,80), Geraniaceae (2,24) and<br />

Scrophulariaceae (1,68%).<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

%<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

AST LAM POA ROS BRAS LIL CARY<br />

families<br />

FAB API BOR RAN GER SCR<br />

Fig. 1. Most important botanical families as the<br />

number of species (AST-Asteraceae; POA-<br />

Poaceae; LAM-Lamiaceae, ROS-Rosaceae; LIL-<br />

Liliaceae;CARY-Caryophyllaceae; FAB-Fabaceae;<br />

API-Apiaceae; BRAS-Brassicaceae;<br />

RAN-Ranunculaceae; BOR-Boraginaceae;<br />

GER-Geraniaceae; SCR-Scrophulariaceae)<br />

From the point of view of the biological forms<br />

(Fig.2), the dominant ones are the<br />

46<br />

hemicryptophytes (42.13%) and the annual and<br />

biennial terophytes (35.95%), present especially in<br />

the steppe meadows. Poorly represented are the<br />

phanerophytes (9.55%), which are inclu<strong>de</strong>d in<br />

forests (with Quercus petraea subsp. d<strong>ale</strong>champii,<br />

Quercus pubescens, Carpinus orientalis, Fraxinus<br />

ornus, Prunus mah<strong>ale</strong>b, Tilia tomentosa) and<br />

bushes (with Crataegus monogyna, Prunus spinosa,<br />

Cotinus coggygria, Ligustrum vulgarae, Rosa<br />

canina, Cornus mas) in the investigated area.<br />

The category of phanerophytes also inclu<strong>de</strong>s<br />

alien species encountered in these hills, some of<br />

them invasive or potentially invasive (Robinia<br />

pseudacacia, Ailanthus altissima, Elaeagnus<br />

angustifolia). The geophytes (7.30%) and the<br />

camephytes (5.05%) are perennial species found<br />

especially in the grassy blanket from forests or<br />

forest edges.<br />

PH<br />

9,55%<br />

TH<br />

35,95%<br />

G<br />

7,30%<br />

CH<br />

5,05%<br />

H<br />

42,13%<br />

Fig. 2. The spectrum of biological forms<br />

(H-hemicriptofite; TH-therofite; PH-fanerofite;<br />

G-geofite; CH-camefite)<br />

Among the floristic elements (Table 2 and<br />

Figure 3), the dominant species are the Eurasian<br />

(35.39%) and Pontic (26.40%) ones, followed at<br />

great distance by other categories of geoelements:<br />

European (8.98%), Central-European (6.17%),<br />

Mediterranean and sub-Mediterranean (6.17%),<br />

Balkan (5.61%), circumpolar (1.68%), Atlantic-<br />

Mediterranean, Taurean-Balkan, Carpatho-Balkan-<br />

Caucasian, and en<strong>de</strong>mic (each with 0.56%).<br />

The large proportion of Pontic species reflects<br />

on the one si<strong>de</strong> the dominance of the steppe<br />

meadows in the studied area, and on the other si<strong>de</strong>,<br />

the nearness of the Razelm-Sinoe lagoon complex<br />

(located approx. 10 km east), which belongs to the<br />

Pontic biogeographic region. Among the categories


Marius Făgăraş / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 45-54 (2010)<br />

of Pontic elements (Fig. 4), the best represented in<br />

the studied area are: the Pontic-Mediterranean<br />

(55.31%), Pontic-Balkan (17.02%), Pontic proper<br />

(10.63%), Pontic-Pannonian-Balkan (8.51%),<br />

Pontic-Pannonian (4.25%), Pontic-Caucasian and<br />

Pontic-Central-European (2.12% each). The arid<br />

climate in the area of these hills is favorable for the<br />

large number of species of southern origin<br />

(Mediterranean, Sub-Mediterranean, Balkan), that<br />

make up a percentage of 11.78%.<br />

Table 2. The percentages of floristic elements<br />

in the studied area<br />

Floristic<br />

elements<br />

Sub-<br />

categories<br />

No. %<br />

Eua 25<br />

Eua Eua(Cont) 17 35,39<br />

Eua(Med) 21<br />

Eur 7<br />

Eur Eur(Cont) 3 8,98<br />

Eur(Med) 4<br />

SE Eur 2<br />

Euc 4<br />

Euc Euc -Med 5 6,17<br />

Euc- 1<br />

subMed<br />

Euc-Balc 1<br />

Pont 5<br />

Pont-Med 26<br />

Pont-Balc 8<br />

Pont Pont-Pan 2 26,40<br />

Pont-Pan- 4<br />

Balc<br />

Pont-Cauc 1<br />

Pont-Euc 1<br />

Med Med 10 6,17<br />

+ subMed subMed 1<br />

Balc 4<br />

Balc-Pan 2<br />

Balc Balc-Anat 1<br />

Balc-Cauc 2 5,61<br />

Balc-Pont- 1<br />

Anat<br />

47<br />

Taur-<br />

Balc<br />

- 1 0,56<br />

Carp-<br />

Balc-<br />

Cauc<br />

- 1 0,56<br />

Atl-Med - 1 0,56<br />

Circ - 3 1,68<br />

End - 1 0,56<br />

Balc<br />

5,61%<br />

Med<br />

6,17%<br />

Pont<br />

26,40%<br />

Cosm<br />

5,05%<br />

Adv<br />

2,24%<br />

Circ<br />

1,68%<br />

Others<br />

2,37%<br />

Euc<br />

6,17%<br />

Eur<br />

8,98%<br />

Eua<br />

35,39%<br />

Fig. 3. The spectrum of floristic elements<br />

Pont-Pan<br />

4,25%<br />

Pont-Pan-Balc<br />

8,51%<br />

Pont-Med<br />

55,31%<br />

Pont-Cauc<br />

2,12%<br />

Pont-Euc<br />

2,12%<br />

Pont<br />

10,63%<br />

Pont-Balc<br />

17,02%<br />

Fig. 4. The spectrum of the Pontic elements<br />

Among the ecological categories connected to<br />

soil humidity (Fig. 5), we can remark the<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>rable percentage of xero-mesophile (57.3%)<br />

and xerophile (24.71%) species, components of the<br />

steppe meadows and of rock formation vegetation.<br />

The mesophile species (14.6%) are present<br />

especially in the forested area of the hills. The<br />

eurythermal species have a smaller percentage<br />

(2.8%).


Floristic aspects of the Hills of Camena village / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 45-54 (2010)<br />

From the point of view of the preference for<br />

temperature (Fig. 5), the micro-mesothermal<br />

(46.62%) and mo<strong>de</strong>rately thermophile (37.64%)<br />

species have consi<strong>de</strong>rable percentages, as they are<br />

regular in the silvosteppe zone which is ma<strong>de</strong> up of<br />

steppe meadows and forests. The thermophile<br />

species (6.17%) are encountered either in the steppe<br />

meadows or in the rock formations.<br />

From the point of view of the preference for<br />

soil pH (Fig. 5), the higher percentages are held by<br />

poor acid-neutrophile (53.37%), acidic-neutrophile<br />

(17.97%) and euryionic species (20.22%). We must<br />

remark the high percentage of acidophile species<br />

(2.8%), grouped on the acidic volcanites that make<br />

up the rock formations in the plateau zone.<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

%<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

U%<br />

T%<br />

R%<br />

1-1,5 2-2,5 3-3,5 4-4,5 5-5,5 6 0<br />

ecological categories<br />

Fig. 5. The spectrum of ecological categories<br />

The 19 rare and endangered taxa (Table 3)<br />

represent 10.67% of the total species and<br />

subspecies i<strong>de</strong>ntified in the Hills of Camena. A<br />

more important element is the presence of the<br />

en<strong>de</strong>mic species Campanula romanica in the area,<br />

but also of other rare and very rare plants at<br />

national level, mentioned in the Red Book of<br />

vascular plants of Romania [11]: Dianthus<br />

nardiformis (Fig. 8), Silene compacta, Moehringia<br />

jankaea, Iris sintenisii, Salvia aethiopis,<br />

Sempervivum zeleborii, Galanthus plicatus,<br />

Nectaroscordium siculum subsp. bulgaricum,<br />

Achillea coarctata, Crocus reticulatus, etc.<br />

In terms of the main endangered categories<br />

(Fig. 6), 1 taxon (0.56%) is endangered, 4 taxa<br />

(2.24%) are vulnerable, while 14 other (7.86%) are<br />

rare, with small populations at national level.<br />

48<br />

Table 3. The rare and threatened taxa in the<br />

Camena Hills area<br />

No Name of the taxa Floris<br />

tic<br />

eleme<br />

nts<br />

1. Achillea coarctata Pont-<br />

Balc<br />

2. Allium flavum Taursubsp.<br />

tauricum Balc<br />

3. Campanula<br />

romanica<br />

4. Crocus reticulatus Pont-<br />

Med<br />

5. Dianthus<br />

nardiformis<br />

6. Echinops ritro<br />

subsp. ruthenicus<br />

IUCN<br />

categories<br />

[11]<br />

R -<br />

R -<br />

IUCN<br />

categories<br />

[10]<br />

End V/R EN<br />

V -<br />

Balc V/R VU<br />

Pont-<br />

Pan-<br />

Balc<br />

R -<br />

Balc R VU<br />

7. Galanthus<br />

plicatus<br />

8. Iris sintenisii Pont-<br />

Balc<br />

R LR<br />

9 Myrrhoi<strong>de</strong>s<br />

nodosa<br />

Med R -<br />

10 Moehringia Pont R VU<br />

. jankae<br />

11 Nectaroscordium Pont- R -<br />

siculum<br />

bulgaricum<br />

subsp. Balc<br />

12 Paeonia<br />

peregrina<br />

Balc V/R -<br />

13 Salvia aethiopis Pont-<br />

Med<br />

E/R -<br />

14 Sempervivum SE R -<br />

zeleborii<br />

Eur<br />

15 Seseli campestre Pont R -<br />

16 Silene compacta Pont-<br />

Med<br />

R EN<br />

17 Stipa ucrainica Pont-<br />

Cauc<br />

R VU<br />

18 Syrenia cana Pont R -<br />

19 Thymus zygioi<strong>de</strong>s Balc R -


NT<br />

89,33%<br />

Marius Făgăraş / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 45-54 (2010)<br />

E<br />

0,56%<br />

V<br />

2,24%<br />

R<br />

7,86%<br />

Fig. 6. The spectrum of sozological categories<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

The research realized between 2008 and 2010<br />

led to the i<strong>de</strong>ntification of 178 vascular taxa which,<br />

from the taxonomical point of view, belong to 46<br />

families and 38 or<strong>de</strong>rs.<br />

From the point of view of the biological forms,<br />

the dominant are the hemicryptophytes and<br />

terophytes, components of the steppe meadows in<br />

the area of Camenei Hills. The phanerophytes,<br />

camephytes and geophytes are present especially in<br />

the forested areas of these hills. Alongsi<strong>de</strong> the<br />

Eurasian species, well represented in the studied<br />

area are also the Pontic elements specific to west-<br />

Pontic steppes, but also those of southern origin<br />

(Mediterranean, sub-Mediterranean and Balkan), an<br />

expression of a climate with sub-Mediterranean<br />

nuances.<br />

Among the ecological categories of plants<br />

established according to their preference for<br />

substrate humidity, air temperature and soil pH, the<br />

predominant species are xero-mesophile, micromesothermal<br />

and mo<strong>de</strong>rately-thermophile ones, as<br />

well as the poorly acid-neutrophile ones.<br />

Of the total i<strong>de</strong>ntified taxa, the rare and<br />

endangered species represent 10.67%. The<br />

important local populations of certain en<strong>de</strong>mic and<br />

rare species at national level place the Camena Hills<br />

in the northern Dobrogea zones important from the<br />

conservation point of view.<br />

49<br />

5. References<br />

[1] PRODAN I., 1934-Conspectul florei Dobrogei<br />

I, Bul. Acad. <strong>de</strong> Înalte St. Agronomice,<br />

Tipogr. Naţională S.A., Cluj, 5, 1.<br />

[2] PRODAN I., 1935-1936 - Conspectul florei<br />

Dobrogei II, Bul. Acad. <strong>de</strong> Înalte St.<br />

Agronomice, Tipogr. Naţională S.A., Cluj, 6.<br />

[3] PRODAN I., 1938 - Conspectul florei Dobrogei<br />

III, Bul.Facult. <strong>de</strong> Agronomie, Cluj, Tipogr.<br />

Cartea Românească., 7.<br />

[4] SĂVULESCU T. (ed.), 1952-1976 - Flora<br />

României, vol. I-XIII, Edit.Aca<strong>de</strong>miei<br />

Române, Bucureşti.<br />

[5] DIHORU GH., DONIŢĂ N., 1970 - Flora <strong>şi</strong><br />

vegetaţia podişului Babadag, Edit. Aca<strong>de</strong>miei<br />

R.S.R., Bucureşti.<br />

[6] CIOCÂRLAN V., 2000 - Flora ilustrată a<br />

României (Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta),<br />

Edit. Ceres, Bucureşti.<br />

[7] TUTIN T.G. HEYWOOD V.H., BURGES<br />

N.A., MOORE D.M., VALENTINE D.H.,<br />

WALTERS S.M. & WEBB D.A. (eds), 1964-<br />

1980 - Flora Europaea, Vols. 1-5, Cambridge,<br />

Cambridge University Press.<br />

[8] TUTIN T.G. HEYWOOD V.H., BURGES<br />

N.A., MOORE D.M., VALENTINE D.H.,<br />

WALTERS S.M. & WEBB D.A. (eds., assist.<br />

by AKEROYD J.R & NEWTON M.E.;<br />

appendices ed. by MILL R.R.), 1993 (reprinted<br />

1996) - Flora Europaea, 2 nd ed., Vol. 1,<br />

Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.<br />

[9] POPESCU A., SANDA V., 1998 - Conspectul<br />

florei cormofitelor spontane din România, Acta<br />

Botanica Horti Bucurestiensis, Edit.<br />

Universităţii din Bucureşti.<br />

[10] OLTEAN M., NEGREAN G., POPESCU A.,<br />

ROMAN N., DIHORU GH., SANDA V.,<br />

MIHĂILESCU S., 1994 - Lista ro<strong>şi</strong>e a<br />

plantelor superioare din România, Studii,<br />

Sinteze, Documente <strong>de</strong> Ecologie, Bucureşti,<br />

(1): 1-52.<br />

[11] DIHORU GH., NEGREAN G., 2009 - Cartea<br />

Ro<strong>şi</strong>e a plantelor vasculare din România, Edit.<br />

Aca<strong>de</strong>miei Române, Bucureşti.


Floristic aspects of the Hills of Camena village / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 45-54 (2010)<br />

Fig. 7. General aspect of volcanic hills of Camena<br />

Fig. 8. Dianthus nardiformis on the volcanic rocks<br />

of Camena<br />

50


Marius Făgăraş / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 45-54 (2010)<br />

Table 1. The list of the vascular plants of Camena Hills<br />

No. Taxa<br />

Family Life Floristic Ecological<br />

forms elements categories<br />

1. Achillea coarctata AST H Pont-Balc U1,5 T4,5 R4,5<br />

2. Achillea setacea AST H Eua(cont) U2 T3 R5<br />

3. Adonis flammaea RAN TH Pont-Med U2 T3,5 R3,5<br />

4. Agropyron cristatum subsp. POA H Pont-Euc U2 T4 R4,5<br />

pectinatum<br />

5. Agropyron ponticum POA H(G) Pont-Balc U1,5 T4,5 R4,5<br />

6. Ailanthus altissima SIM PH Adv U0 T0 R0<br />

7. Ajuga chamaepytis subsp. ciliata LAM TH Pont-Med U2,5 T4 R3<br />

8. Ajuga genevensis LAM H Eua(cont) U2 T3 R4<br />

9. Alliaria petiolata LIL TH-H Eua U3 T3 R4<br />

10. Allium flavum subsp. tauricum LIL G Taur-Balc U1,5 T4 R4<br />

11. Allium rotundum LIL G Euc(Med) U2 T4 R4<br />

12 Alyssum alyssoi<strong>de</strong>s BRAS TH Eua(Cont) U1 T3 R0<br />

13. Anagalis arvensis PRIM TH Cosm U3 T3,5 R0<br />

14. Androsace maxima PRIM TH Eua(Cont) U2 T4 R4<br />

15. Anemone sylvestris RAN H Eua(cont) U2 T3,5 R4<br />

16. Anthemis ruthenica AST TH Eur(Cont) U2 T4 R4<br />

17. Anthriscus cerefolium subsp. API TH Pont-Med U2,5 T4 R4<br />

trichosperma<br />

18. Artemisia absinthium AST H(CH) Eua U2 T3 R4<br />

19. Artemisia austriaca AST CH Eua(cont) U2 T4 R4,5<br />

20. Asparagus verticillatus LIL G Pont-Balc U1 T4,5 R4<br />

21. Asperula cynanchica RUB H Pont-Med U2 T3 R5<br />

22. Asperula tenella RUB H Pont-Balc U2 T4 R4<br />

23. Ballota nigra LAM H Euc U2 T3,5 R4<br />

24. Bassia prostrata CHEN CH Eua(cont) U1,5 T4 R4,5<br />

25. Berteroa incana BRAS TH Eua(cont) U2 T3 R4<br />

26. Brachypodium sylvaticum POA H Eua(Med) U3 T3 R4<br />

27. Bromus hor<strong>de</strong>aceus POA TH Eua U0 T3 R0<br />

28. Bromus sterilis POA TH Eua(Med) U2 T4 R4<br />

29. Bromus tectorum POA TH Eua(cont) U1,5 T3,5 R0<br />

30. Buglossoi<strong>de</strong>s arvensis BOR TH Eua U0 T0 R4<br />

31. Buglossoi<strong>de</strong>s purpurocaerulea BOR H-G Euc-subMed U2,5 T4 R4,5<br />

32. C<strong>ale</strong>pina irregularis BRAS TH Pont-Med U2 T4 R3<br />

33. Camelina microcarpa BRAS TH Eua U3 T3 R0<br />

34. Campanula romanica CAMP H End U1,5 T4 R0<br />

35. Campanula sibirica CAMP H Eua(cont) U2,5 T4 R4<br />

36. Cardaria draba BRAS H Eua(Med) U2 T4 R4<br />

37. Carduus acanthoi<strong>de</strong>s AST TH Eur(Med) U2 T3 R0<br />

38. Carpinus orientalis CORY PH Balc-Cauc U3 T4 R4,5<br />

39. Carthamus lanatus AST TH Pont-Med U2,5 T4 R0<br />

40. Centaurea cyanus AST TH Med(Cosm) U3 T4 R0<br />

41. Centaurea diffusa AST TH Pont-Balc U2 T4 R0<br />

51


Floristic aspects of the Hills of Camena village / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 45-54 (2010)<br />

42. Cerastium brachypetalum CARY TH Med U3 T3 R0<br />

43. Chamomilla recutita AST TH Eua(Med) U2,5 T3,5 R5<br />

44. Chondrilla juncea AST H Eua U1,5 T3,5 R4<br />

45. Chrysopogon gryllus POA H Med U1,5 T4 R4<br />

46. Cichorium intybus AST H Eua U3 T0 R3<br />

47. Conium maculatum API TH-TH Eua U3 T3 R3<br />

48. Convolvulus arvensis CONV H(G) Cosm U2,5 T3,5 R3,5<br />

49. Convolvulus cantabricus CONV H Pont-Med U1,5 T3,5 R4<br />

50. Conyza cana<strong>de</strong>nsis AST TH Adv(Am.N) U2,5 T0 R0<br />

51. Cornus mas CORN PH Pont-Med U2 T3,5 R4<br />

52 Coronilla varia FAB H Eua(Med) U2 T3 R4<br />

53. Corydalis cava FUM G Euc U3 T3 R0<br />

54. Cotinus coggygria ANAC PH Pont-Med U2 T4,5 R4<br />

55. Crataegus monogyna ROS PH Eur U2,5 T3,5 R3<br />

56. Crepis sancta AST TH Pont-Balc U1,5 T4 R4<br />

57. Crocus reticulatus IRID G Pont-Med U2,5 T4 R3<br />

58. Crupina vulgaris AST TH Pont-Med U2 T3,5 R0<br />

59. Cynanchum acutum ASCL H Pont-Med U2,5 T4 R0<br />

60. Cynodon dactylon POA G(H) Cosm U2 T3,5 R0<br />

61. Daucus carota API TH Eua(Med) U2,5 T3 R0<br />

62. Dianthus nardiformis CARY CH Balc U1,5 T4,5 R4,5<br />

63. Dichanthium ischaemum POA H Eua(Med) U1,5 T5 R3<br />

64. Echinops ritro subsp. ruthenicus AST H Pont-Pan-Balc U1,5 T4 R4,5<br />

65. Elaeagnus angustifolia ELEG PH Adv<br />

66. Elymus repens POA G Circ U0 T0 R0<br />

67. Erodium cicutarium GER TH Cosm U2,5 T0 R0<br />

68. Eryngium campestre API H Pont-Med U1 T5 R4<br />

69. Erysimum diffusum BRAS H Eua(Cont) U1,5 T3 R4<br />

70. Euphorbia agraria EUPH H Pont-Med U2 T4 R0<br />

71. Euphorbia nicaeensis EUPH H Pont-Pan-Balc-<br />

Anat<br />

U1,5 T5 R5<br />

72. Festuca v<strong>ale</strong>siaca POA H Eua(cont) U1 T5 R4<br />

73. Filipendula vulgaris ROS H Eua U2,5 T3 R4,5<br />

74. Fragaria viridis ROS H Eur(Cont) U2 T4 R3<br />

75. Fraxinus ornus OLE PH Med U1,5 T3,5 R5<br />

76. Fumaria rostellata FUM TH Euc-Balc U3 T0 R3,5<br />

77. Galanthus plicatus AMAR G Taur-Cauc U3 T4 R3<br />

78. Galium humifusum RUB H Pont-Balc U2 T4 R4,5<br />

79. Geranium divaricatum GER TH Eua(Med) U2,5 T3 R4<br />

80. Geranium pussilum GER TH Eur(Med) U2,5 T3 R0<br />

81. Geranium rotundifolium GER TH subMed U2 T3,5 R4<br />

82. Geum urbanum ROS H Eua(Med) U3 T3 R4<br />

83. Glechoma hirsuta LAM H(CH) Pont-Med-Euc U2,5 T3 R4<br />

84. Hieracium bauhinii AST H Euc U1,5 T3 R3,5<br />

85. Hieracium pilosella AST H Eua U2 T0 R2<br />

86. Holosteum umbellatum CARY TH Eua(Med) U2 T3,5 R0<br />

87. Hypericum perforatum HYP H Eua U3 T3 R0<br />

88. Iris sintenisii IRID G Pont-Balc U2 T4 R4<br />

52


Marius Făgăraş / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 45-54 (2010)<br />

89. Koeleria macrantha POA H Circ U2 T4 R5<br />

90. Lamium amplexicaule LAM TH Eua(Med) U2,5 T3,5 R0<br />

91. Lappula barbata BOR TH-TH Pont-Med U2 T3,5 R4<br />

92. Lathyrus tuberosus FAB H(G) Eua(Med) U2 T4 R4<br />

93. Ligustrum vulgare OLE PH Eua(Med) U2,5 T3 R3<br />

94. Linum austriacum LIN H Eua(cont) U1,5 T3,5 R4<br />

95. Malva sylvestris MALV TH(H) Eua(Cosm) U3 T3 R3<br />

96. Marrubium peregrinum LAM H Eua(Med) U2 T4 R0<br />

97. Marrubium vulgarae LAM H(CH) Eua(Med) U1 T4 R4<br />

98. Medicago lupulina FAB TH(H) Eua U2,5 T3 R4<br />

99. Medicago minima FAB TH Eua(Med) U1,5 T4 R4<br />

100. Melica ciliata POA H Eur(Med) U1,5 T4 R4<br />

101. Melilotus alba FAB TH Eua U2,5 T3 R0<br />

102. Minuartia setacea CARY CH Pont U1,5 T0 R4<br />

103. Moehringia jankae CARY H Pont U1 T4 R4,5<br />

104. Myosotis stricta BOR TH Eua(Med) U2 T0 R2,5<br />

105. Myrrhoi<strong>de</strong>s nodosa API TH Med U2,5 T4,5 R4,5<br />

106. Nectaroscordum siculum subsp.<br />

bulgaricum<br />

LIL G Pont-Balc U3,5 T3,5 R3,5<br />

107. Nigella arvensis RAN TH Pont-Med U2 T4 R4<br />

108. Nonea atra BOR TH Balc-Anat U2 T4 R3<br />

109. Onopordum acanthium AST TH Eua(Med) U2,5 T4 R4<br />

110. Onosma visianii BOR H Pont-Pan-Balc U1,5 T4,5 R4,5<br />

111. Origanum vulgare LAM H Med U2 T3 R3<br />

112. Orlaya grandiflora API TH Euc-Med U2 T3,5 R4<br />

113. Ornithogalum refractum LIL G Balc-Pan-Cauc U2 T3,5 R4<br />

114. Paeonia peregrina PAE H(G) Balc U2 T3,5 R5<br />

115. Papaver dubium PAP TH Eur U2 T3,5 R3<br />

116. Papaver rhoeas PAP TH Cosm U3 T3,5 R4<br />

117. Petrorhagia prolifera CARY TH Pont-Med U1,5 T4 R3<br />

118. Phleum phleoi<strong>de</strong>s POA H Eua(cont) U2 T3 R4<br />

119. Phlomis tuberosa LAM H Eua(Cont) U2,5 T3,5 R4<br />

120. Pinus nigra PIN PH Eua U0 T0 R0<br />

121. Plantago lanceolata PLAN H Eua U3 T0 R0<br />

122. Poa angustifolia POA H Eua U2 T3 R0<br />

123. Polycnemum majus CHEN TH Eua U1,5 T4,5 R4<br />

124. Polygonum aviculare POLG TH Cosm U2,5 T0 R3<br />

125. Polygonatum latifolium LIL G Pont-Pan-Balc U3 T3,5 R4<br />

126. Potentilla argentea ROS H Eua U2 T4 R2<br />

127. Potentilla recta s.l. ROS H Eur(Cont) U1,5 T3,5 R4<br />

128. Prunus mah<strong>ale</strong>b ROS PH Med U2 T3 R4,5<br />

129. Prunus spinosa ROS PH Eur(Med) U2 T3 R3<br />

130. Quercus petraea subsp. FAG PH E.Med.-Carp- U2,5 T2,5 R0<br />

d<strong>ale</strong>champii<br />

Balc<br />

131. Quercus pubescens FAG PH Med U1,5 T5 R5<br />

132. Ranunculus oxyspermus RAN H Balc-Cauc U2,5 T3 R3<br />

133. Reseda lutea RES TH(H) Eua(Med) U2 T3 R0<br />

134. Robinia pseudacacia FAB PH Adv(Am.N) U2,5 T4 R0<br />

53


Floristic aspects of the Hills of Camena village / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 45-54 (2010)<br />

135. Rosa canina ROS PH Eur U2 T3 R3<br />

136. Rumes acetosella subsp. POLG H SE Eur U2 T3 R2<br />

137.<br />

acetoselloi<strong>de</strong>s<br />

Salvia aethiopis LAM H Pont-Med U2 T5 R0<br />

138. Salvia nemorosa LAM H Pont-Med U2 T4 R4<br />

139. Salvia nutans LAM H Pont-Pan U1 T5 R5<br />

140. Sambucus nigra CAPR PH Eur U3 T3 R3<br />

141. Saxifraga tridactylites SAX TH Eua U2 T3,5 R4<br />

142. Scilla bifolia LIL G Euc U3,5 T3 R4<br />

143. Scleranthus annuus CARY TH-TH Eua U2 T3 R2<br />

144. Scleranthus perennis CARY H(CH) Eur U3 T0 R3<br />

145. Sedum maximum CRAS H Eur U2,5 T0 R4<br />

146. Sempervivum zeleborii CRAS CH SE Eur U1,5 T3,5 R4,5<br />

147. Senecio jacobaea AST H Eua U2,5 T3 R3<br />

148. Seseli campestre API H Pont U2,5 T4 R4<br />

149. Si<strong>de</strong>ritis montana LAM TH Eua U2 T4 R4<br />

150. Silene compacta CARY TH Pont-Med U2 T4 R4<br />

151. Sisymbrium orient<strong>ale</strong> BRAS TH Pont-Med U2,5 T4 R3<br />

152. Solidago virgaurea AST H Circ U2,5 T3 R3<br />

153. Sonchus oleraceus AST TH Cosm U3 T0 R0<br />

154. Stachys germanica LAM H Pont-Med U2 T4 R3<br />

155. Stachys recta LAM H Pont-Med-Euc U2 T5 R5<br />

156. Stipa capillata POA H Eua(Cont) U1 T5 R4<br />

157. Stipa ucrainica POA H Pont-Cauc U1 T4 R4<br />

158. Syrenia cana BRA TH Pont U1,5 T4 R4<br />

159. Teucrium chamaedrys LAM CH Euc(Med) U2 T4 R4<br />

160. Teucrium<br />

capitatum<br />

polium subsp. LAM CH Med U1,5 T4 R4,5<br />

161. Thalictrum minus RAN H Eua U2 T4 R4<br />

162. Thlaspi perfoliatum BRAS TH Eua U2,5 T3,5 R4,5<br />

163. Thymus pannonicus LAM CH Pont-Pan U1,5 T3,5 R4<br />

164. Thymus zygioi<strong>de</strong>s LAM CH Balc U1,5 T4 R4,5<br />

165. Tilia tomentosa TIL PH Balc-Pan U2,5 T3,5 R3<br />

166. Tragopogon dubius AST TH Euc(Med) U2,5 T3,5 R0<br />

167. Trifolium arvensae FAB TH Eua(Med) U1,5 T3 R4<br />

168. Trifolium campestre FAB TH Eur U3 T3 R0<br />

169. Trifolium echinatum FAB TH Med U1,5 T4,5 R4<br />

170. Urtica dioica URT H Cosm U3 T3 R4<br />

171. V<strong>ale</strong>rianella lasiocarpa VAL TH Balc-Pont-Anat U1,5 T5 R4<br />

172. Verbascum phlomoi<strong>de</strong>s SCR TH Euc(Med) U2,5 T3,5 R4<br />

173. Veronica<br />

jacquinii<br />

austriaca subsp. SCR H Pont-Med-Euc U2 T4 R4<br />

174. Veronica teucrium SCR H Eua(Med) U1,5 T4 R4,5<br />

175. Vinca herbacea APOC H Pont U2 T5 R4<br />

176. Vincetoxicum hirundinaria ASCL H Eua(Cont) U2 T4 R4<br />

177. Viola kitaibeliana VIO TH Pont-Med U2 T4 R4,5<br />

178. Viola odorata VIO H Atl-Med U2,5 T3,5 R4<br />

54


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

IDENTIFICATION OF SOME ROSE GENITORS WITH RESISTANCE TO THE<br />

PATHOGENS AGENTS ATTACK<br />

*Marioara TRANDAFIRESCU, Corina GAVĂT, Iulian TRANDAFIRESCU and Elena DOROFTEI<br />

*Ovidius University of Constanţa, Natural Sciences Faculty, Department of Biology<br />

Mamaia Avenue, No. 124, Constanţa, 900552, Romania, e-mail: mtrandafirescu@yahoo.com<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: In the South-Eastern Romania, as in all country the rose culture is higly praised for its ornamental<br />

value both in parks and domestic gar<strong>de</strong>n. In this zone of our country the rose culture is more important because<br />

the Black Seasi<strong>de</strong> provi<strong>de</strong> a better enviroment (82 km). Besi<strong>de</strong> the growing of forign cultivars from Europe<br />

Companies, Romania has done a breeding work to <strong>de</strong>velop autochtonous cultivars (Rusticana, Ambasador,<br />

Bordura <strong>de</strong> nea, Rosagold, Simina, etc.) better adapted to our local conditions. In rose breeding besi<strong>de</strong>s the<br />

ornamental value of these flowers (nice leaves, colours and shapes) the disease resistance has been taken into<br />

acount. Among the specific pathogens very harmful for the rose culture, one can mention: Sphaerotheca pannosa<br />

(Wallr) Lev var rosae Woron (pow<strong>de</strong>ry mil<strong>de</strong>w), Diplocarpon rosae Wolf (black spott), Phragmidium<br />

mucronatum (Pers) Schlecht (rose rust) and Botrytis cinerea Pers (grey mold). One of the most effective methods<br />

to prevent these pathogens attack is breeding new cultivar and genically resistant genitors. These paper present<br />

the behaviour of 50 genotypes from rose collection of Fruit Growing Development of Fruit Tree Constanta and<br />

their response of such pathogens. The conditions of natural infections allowed grouping the biological material in<br />

4 classes of resistance. This clasifications was done acording to levels of frequency (F%) and intensity (I). The<br />

rose cultivars with genetic resistance to this pathogens are: Queen Elisabeth, Foc <strong>de</strong> tabara, Rubin, Parfum,<br />

Emerald d’or, Bel Ange, Apogee.<br />

Keywords: black spott, pow<strong>de</strong>ry mil<strong>de</strong>w, rose rust, genitors, resistance<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

From the ol<strong>de</strong>st times the rose was consi<strong>de</strong>red<br />

"Queen of The Flowers" due its beauty, perfume,<br />

richness in colors and multiple shapes of the grown<br />

cultivars. Therefore, the rose place is in the front of<br />

the ornamental species used for park and gar<strong>de</strong>ns<br />

<strong>de</strong>coration and for cut-flowers production.<br />

Unfortunately, the rose as many other cultivated<br />

plants can suffer due to the attack of some very<br />

damaging pathogens. Un<strong>de</strong>r favorable conditions, the<br />

pathogens can <strong>de</strong>termine the partial or total<br />

<strong>de</strong>foliation of the plants, they become weak and the<br />

cut-flowers production can be diminished by quantity<br />

and quality as well.<br />

In or<strong>de</strong>r to prevent and control the pathogens<br />

specific to the roses, the studies carried out in<br />

Romania and in the World, were focused on<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntification of the species responsible for the<br />

diseases occurrence and knowledge of their biology<br />

(Bedian, 1980, Bernardis, 2004, Ostaciuc, 1982,<br />

Sandu 2004, Szekelly, 1981, Wagner, 2002), and on<br />

the other hand, was investigated the efficacy of some<br />

fungici<strong>de</strong>s in or<strong>de</strong>r to control them(Bon and coll,<br />

1978, Morrison, 1978, Hagan and coll 1988, Losing,<br />

1988, Qvarnstrom, 1989, Raabe, 1989, Rolim and<br />

col, 1990, etc).<br />

The results obtained in the World (Saun<strong>de</strong>rs,<br />

1970; Klimenko, 1973; Simonyan, 1973; Semina,<br />

1980, 1984; Palmer, 1978; Costlediene, 1981) and in<br />

our country (Costache, 1993, Argatu, 1993, Sekely,<br />

1981, Wagner, 2002) clearly emphasized that the<br />

most efficient method to prevent the attack of the<br />

pathogens is the creation and extension in the culture<br />

of some roses cultivars genetically resistant to<br />

diseases.<br />

Therefore, the researches carried out during<br />

2008-2009 at Research Station for Fruit Growing<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


I<strong>de</strong>ntification of some rose genitors with resistance... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 55-59 (2010)<br />

Constanta had as central objective the evaluation of<br />

some roses cultivars behavior to some key pathogens<br />

in or<strong>de</strong>r to i<strong>de</strong>ntify some resistance donors genitors<br />

for further breeding works.<br />

In the reference area the pathogens of economic<br />

importance for the rose culture are Diplocarpon<br />

rosae Wolf, Sphaerotheca pannosa (Wallr)Lev var<br />

rosae Woron <strong>şi</strong> Phragmidium mucronatum (Pers)<br />

Schlecht.<br />

2. Material and Methods<br />

The biological material for investigations was<br />

represented by 50 roses cultivars preserved in the<br />

collection owned by Research Station for Fruit<br />

Growing Constanţa. Observation were ma<strong>de</strong><br />

regarding the attack frequency (F%) and intensity (I<br />

notes) of the pathogens Diplocarpon rosa,<br />

Sphaerotheca pannosa var rosae and Phragmidium<br />

mucronatum, and finally the attack <strong>de</strong>gree (AD) was<br />

calculated<br />

For disease intensity (I notes) the sc<strong>ale</strong> „0-6”<br />

was used. The observations were carried out in the<br />

period of attack maximum for each of three key<br />

pathogens studied.<br />

According the attack <strong>de</strong>gree (A.D.) value, the<br />

cultivars were classified in five resistance classes as<br />

follow:<br />

- resistant (R) cu A.D.= 0-5%<br />

- slightly attacked (SA) with A.D. = 5.0-12.5%<br />

- medium resistant (MR) with A.D. = 12.5-22.5%<br />

- sensible (S) with A.D. = 22.5-37.6%<br />

- very sensible (VS) with A.D. = more than 37,6%<br />

To establish the D.L., in or<strong>de</strong>r to establish the<br />

five classes of cultivars the average value took into<br />

calculations ws 22.9%.<br />

3. Results and Discussions<br />

In 2008, the attack of Diplocarpon rosae, fungi<br />

which <strong>de</strong>termine the black spot disease was<br />

evi<strong>de</strong>nced on rose cultivars in the third <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong> of<br />

May, being stimulated by the amount of precipitation<br />

at the vegetation start (114,9 mm) and by the high<br />

atmospheric relative humidity (over 75%).<br />

The disease symptoms occurrence on leaves<br />

consisted in some black spots, between 2-5 mm up to<br />

56<br />

10-18 mm in diameter, highly visible on the superior<br />

face of the leaves. (Fig.1).<br />

Fig. 1. Pătarea neagră a frunzelor <strong>de</strong> trandafir –<br />

Diplocarpon rosae<br />

Un<strong>de</strong>r such condition, presented in table 1, the<br />

(natural) genetic resistance to the pathogen attack<br />

manifested the cultivars: Emeran<strong>de</strong> d’or, Grad<br />

Premiere, Traviata, Apogee, Luchian, Monica, Coup<br />

<strong>de</strong> Foudre and Tour Eiffel.<br />

The cultivars: Baccara, Pascali, Bel Ange,<br />

Creole, Dame <strong>de</strong> Coeur and Ingrid Bergman vere<br />

evi<strong>de</strong>nced as slightly attacked (SA); and the cultivars:<br />

Flamenco, Karla, Rumba, Maria Callas, Grand Mogol<br />

and Montezuma were evi<strong>de</strong>nced as medium resistant<br />

(MR).<br />

Very sensible (V.S) leaves black spot attack<br />

proved to be the cultivars Mainzer Fastnacht, Rose<br />

Gaujard, Kor<strong>de</strong>s Perfecta, Detroit, Horido <strong>şi</strong> Konigin<br />

<strong>de</strong>r Rosen, but they can be used as indicators for this<br />

disease. At this group of cultivars the plants were<br />

premature <strong>de</strong>foliated at the end of July.<br />

The climatic conditions from the Black Sea<br />

coast, characterized by strong wind, high temperature<br />

during the day (26-28 o C) and the presence of the<br />

water con<strong>de</strong>nse on the vegetative organs of the plants<br />

favorised, the occurrence of the pow<strong>de</strong>ry mil<strong>de</strong>w<br />

attack produced by Sphaerotheca pannosa var rosae<br />

fungi starting with the last <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong> of May.<br />

The symptoms were noticed initially on the both<br />

si<strong>de</strong>s of the leaves as irregular white dusty spots<br />

(Fig.2).


Marioara Trandafirescu et al. / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 55-59 (2010)<br />

Table 1. Behaviour of some cultivars roses to the<br />

attack of the main pathogens agents<br />

CULTIVARS Diplocarpon Sphaerotheca Phragmidium<br />

rosae pannosa var. rosae mucronatum<br />

G.A. Resistan G.A. Resistan G.A. Resistan<br />

(%) -ce class (%) -ce class (%) -ce class<br />

Broca<strong>de</strong> 7.2 S.A. 11.6 M.R. 12.3 M.R.<br />

Grand premiere 0 R 0 R 4.6 S.A.<br />

Creole 12.4 S.A. 6.5 S.A. 3.2 S.A.<br />

Traviata 0 R 1.2 R 14.6 M.R.<br />

Grand prix 32.4 S 0 R 0 R<br />

Horido 47.3 F.S. 1.0 R 3.6 R<br />

Apogee 0 R 0.8 R 0 R<br />

Luchian 0 R 4.2 S.A. 3.6 S.A.<br />

First love 1.2 R 17.6 M.R. 38.4 F.S.<br />

Concerto 3.7 R 9.7 S.A. 12.2 S.A.<br />

Konigin <strong>de</strong>r<br />

Rosen<br />

63.0 F.S. 14.2 M.R. 0 R<br />

Foc <strong>de</strong> tabără 4.1 R 1.6 R 1 R<br />

Miss Univers 26.3 S 0 R 0 R<br />

Chicago Peace 32.0 S 37.6 F.S. 22.8 S<br />

Kronenburg 34.6 S 17.6 M.R. 0 R<br />

Bel Ange 4.3 S.A. 0 R 0 R<br />

Cocotte 0 R 0 R 18.3 M.R.<br />

Samurai 1.6 R 3.6 R 4.3 R<br />

Monica 0 R 0 R 0 R<br />

Montezuma 17.4 M.R. 9.6 S.A. 4.5 S.A.<br />

Don Juan 3.6 R 0 R 0 R<br />

Grand Mogol 15.0 M.R. 2.0 R 42.6 F.S.<br />

Sutter’s Gold 11.7 S 42.6 F.S. 53.2 F.S.<br />

Effel Tour 0 R 3.6 S.A. 1.2 R<br />

Detroit 37.9 F.S. 6.4 S.A. 0 R<br />

Maria Callas 15.6 M.R. 0 R 1.2 R<br />

Simfonia albă 24.0 S 0 R 1.2 R<br />

Mabella 57.0 F.S. 10.2 M.R. 13.7 M.R.<br />

Pascali 12.2 S.A. 0 R 0.9 R<br />

Rumba 19.3 M.R. 6.9 S.A. 22.0 M.R.<br />

King’s Ranson 0 R 1.2 R 54.6 F.S.<br />

Baccara 6.3 S.A. 22.0 S 7.2 S.A.<br />

Superstar 1.2 R 3.6 R 12.6 M.R.<br />

Kor<strong>de</strong>s Perfecta 51.2 F.S. 17.9 M.R. 21.3 M.R.<br />

Madame<br />

Meilland<br />

0.7 R 7.3 S.A. 4.6 S.A.<br />

Coup Foudre 0 R 12.6 M.R. 17.2 M.R.<br />

Mr. Lincoln 2.6 R 0 R 0 R<br />

Dame <strong>de</strong> Coeur 7.2 S.A. 12.6 M.R. 42.1 F.S.<br />

Rose Gaujard 42.6 F.S. 51.8 F.S. 22.4 M.R.<br />

Carina 12.4 S.A. 6.3 S.A. 1.2 R<br />

Queen Elisabeth 3.2 R 1.2 R 0 R<br />

Eminance 1.2 R 2.6 R 0 R<br />

Mainzer<br />

Fastnacht<br />

38.6 F.S 7.9 S.A. 9.6 S.A.<br />

Karla 13.0 M.R. 1.6 R 2.0 R<br />

Flamenco 19.3 M.R. 3.6 R 12.3 S.A.<br />

Ingrid Bergman 7.2 S.A. 14.6 M.R. 1.2 R<br />

Ambassador 1.2 R 6.2 S.A. 1.6 R<br />

Emeran<strong>de</strong> d’or 0.6 R 38.6 F.S. 0 R<br />

Parfum 0 R 1.8 R 2.6 R<br />

Rubin 0 R 0 R 0 R<br />

57<br />

Fig. 2. Făinarea trandafirului – Sphaerotheca<br />

pannosa var. rosae<br />

Afterwards, the attack progressed covering<br />

almost entirely the leaves, which turn in yellow, then<br />

dried and fallen down. In this case the attack<br />

progressed also on the young floral buds of the<br />

sensible cultivars, which were covered by the<br />

mycelium felt and they could not open.<br />

Assessment of the data presented in the same<br />

table revel that, a high (natural) resistance to this<br />

damaging pathogen stroke manifested the cultivars:<br />

Grand Prix, Miss Univers, Maria Callas, Pascali,<br />

Simfonia albă, their vegetative organs were entirely<br />

clear from Sphaerotheca pannosa var rosae. fungi<br />

symptoms.<br />

At the other pole were the cultivars: Emeran<strong>de</strong><br />

d’or, Chicago Peace, Sutter’s Gold and Rose Gaujard<br />

which were rated as very sensible (V.S.), but they can<br />

be used as sensibility indicators.<br />

The attack produced by Phragmidium<br />

mucronatum fungi, was noticed at the end of the first<br />

<strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong> of May and progressed until the last <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong> of<br />

September. In this month this pathogen attack<br />

frequency (F%) and the intensity (I notes) registered<br />

the highest values.<br />

From the beginning the disease progressed on<br />

all plants organs: leaves, young branches, stalks and<br />

floral buds (Fig. 3). On these organs was noticed the<br />

presence of some orange pustules representing the<br />

fungus ecidia.


I<strong>de</strong>ntification of some rose genitors with resistance... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 55-59 (2010)<br />

Fig. 3. Rugina trandafirului – Phragmidium<br />

mucronatum<br />

In the last <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong> of May, on the inferior face of<br />

the plant leaves, small p<strong>ale</strong>-yellow pustules occurs,<br />

representing the nest of uredospores which produce<br />

repeated secondary infections during the vegetation<br />

period.<br />

Starting with the second <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong> of June, on the<br />

inferior face of the plant leaves, was observed the<br />

presence of the black pustules representing the shelter<br />

of the teleutospores containing the resistance organs<br />

of the fungus.<br />

Among the cultivars that manifested a<br />

pronounced genetic resistance to the attack of this<br />

pathogen can be mentioned: Apogee, Bel Ange,<br />

Emeran<strong>de</strong> d’or, Grand Prix, Kroenenburg, Kroningin<br />

<strong>de</strong>r Roson, Miss Univers, Detroit, Rubin, Queen<br />

Elisabeth, Eminance. Their vegetative organs were<br />

entirely clear from pathogen signs all of the<br />

vegetation period.<br />

The vast majority of the other cultivar studied<br />

showed themselves as slightly attacked (SA) or<br />

medium resistant (MR).<br />

In the case of this pathogen, as was highlighted<br />

in table 1, very sensible cultivars (VS) manifested the<br />

cultivars Grand Mogol, Sutter’s Gold, King’s Ranson<br />

and First love.<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

In the Romanian zone of Black Sea coast, the<br />

pathogens with economical importance for the roses<br />

grown in open fields are: Diplocarpon rosae Wolf,<br />

Sphaerotheca pannosa (Wallr) Lev var rosae Woron<br />

<strong>şi</strong> Phragmidium mucronatum (Pers) Schlecht.<br />

The rose cultivars Emerald d’or, Bel Ange,<br />

Apogee, Foc <strong>de</strong> tabără, Queen Elisabeth, Rubin,<br />

Parfum and Rubin, present genetic resistance for all<br />

three damaging agents and can be used as resistance<br />

genitors in the works carried out to bread new disease<br />

resistant rose cultivars.<br />

The fact that un<strong>de</strong>r the some climatic<br />

conditions, the rose cultivars manifest various attack<br />

<strong>de</strong>grees to the pathogens reveals that, the resistance is<br />

cultivars trait, which represent the key factor in<br />

prevention of the most damaging specific pathogens.<br />

58<br />

5. References<br />

[1] BEDIAN G., 1980. Rust (Phragmidium sp.) on<br />

roses, R.P.P., 59, 4, 1562.<br />

[2] BON Y., Bourdin J., Berthier G., 1978. Efficacité<br />

<strong>de</strong> quelques fongici<strong>de</strong>s vis-á-vis <strong>de</strong> L’oidium du<br />

rosier (Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae),<br />

Phytiatrie – Phytopharmacie, 27 (3), 199-205.<br />

[3] CASTLENDINE P., Grout B.W.W., Roberts<br />

A.V., 1981. Cuticular resistance to Diplocarpon<br />

rosae, Transaction of the British Mycological<br />

Society, 47.<br />

[3] COSTACHE C., Costache M., Argatu Constanta,<br />

1993. Rezultate preliminare privind comportarea<br />

unor soiuri <strong>de</strong> trandafir la atacul principalilor<br />

agenţi patogeni. An<strong>ale</strong>le I.C.L.F. vol. XII, 119-<br />

129.<br />

[4] HAGAN A. K., Gillian C. H., Fare D. C.,1987.<br />

Evaluation of new fungici<strong>de</strong>s for control of rose<br />

black spot, Journal of Environmental Horticulture<br />

6 (2), 67-69.<br />

[5] LÖSING H., 1988. Bekämpfung von Rosenrost,<br />

Deutsche Baumschule 40 (11), 518-519.<br />

[6] MORRISON L. S., 1978. Preliminary results on<br />

the evaluation of fungici<strong>de</strong>s for the control of<br />

black spot of rose. Nursery Research Field Day P<br />

– 777, 59-60.<br />

[7] QVARNSTRÖM K., 1989. Control of black spot<br />

(Marssonina rosae) on roses, Växtskyddsnotiser<br />

53 (3), 58-63.<br />

[8] PALMER L. T., Salac S. S., 1978. Reaction of<br />

several types of roses to black spot fungus,<br />

Diplocarpon rosae, Indian Phytopathology 30<br />

(3), 366-368.<br />

[9] ROLIM P. R. R., Toledo A. C. D., Cardoso R.<br />

M. G., Brignani Neto F., Oliveira D. A., 1990.<br />

Comparison of fungici<strong>de</strong>s for control of rose<br />

black spot (Diplocarpon rosae) and pow<strong>de</strong>ry<br />

mil<strong>de</strong>w (Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae),<br />

Summa Phytopathologicals 16 (3-4), 269-274.<br />

[10] SAUNDERS P. J. W., 1970. The resistance of<br />

some cultivars and species of Rosa to<br />

Diplocarpon rosae Wolf causing black spot<br />

disease, Natn. Rose, A., 118-128.<br />

[11] SEMINA S. N., Klimenco Z. K., 1976.<br />

Evaluation of gar<strong>de</strong>n rose gene pool for


Marioara Trandafirescu et al. / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 55-59 (2010)<br />

resistance to pow<strong>de</strong>ry mil<strong>de</strong>w. Byull Gosudar,<br />

Nikit. Bot. Sada, 2 (30), 48-54.<br />

[12] SIMONYAN S. A., 1973. Pow<strong>de</strong>ry mil<strong>de</strong>w of<br />

rose in the Erevan Botanical Gr<strong>de</strong>n. Biol. J.<br />

Armenii, 26 (7), 62-73.<br />

[13] SZEKELY I., Wagner Şt., Drăgan Maria, 1981.<br />

Rezistenţa diferitelor soiuri <strong>de</strong> trandafir faţă <strong>de</strong><br />

atacul <strong>de</strong> făinare (Sphaerotheca pannosa var<br />

rosae) în funcţie <strong>de</strong> unele caracteristici anatomomorfologice,<br />

Simpoz. CAER Cluj, ASAS, ICPP.<br />

[14] WAGNER Şt., Râureanu V., 1996. Princip<strong>ale</strong>le<br />

boli <strong>şi</strong> dăunători ai trandafirilor <strong>şi</strong> combaterea<br />

lor. Rosarium, nr. 1.<br />

59


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

PRELIMINARY DATA ON MELEDIC – MANZALESTI NATURAL RESERVE (BUZAU<br />

COUNTY, ROMANIA)<br />

Daciana SAVA *, Mariana ARCUŞ**, Elena DOROFTEI *<br />

*Ovidius University, Natural Sciences Faculty,<br />

Aleea Universitatii No. 1, corp B, Constanţa, 900470, Romania, e-mail: daciana.sava@gmail.com<br />

** Ovidius University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Aleea Universitatii No. 1, corp B, Constanţa, 900470, Romania<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: the Meledic –Manz<strong>ale</strong>sti Reserve is situated in the central-eastern part of Romania, in Buzau County,<br />

60km north form town of Buzau. The Reserve (136 hectares) is <strong>de</strong>limitated by four rivers and it is situated at a<br />

medium altitu<strong>de</strong> of 530 m. Because of the remarkable forms of relief, appeared as a result of dissolution of salt, the<br />

presence of a salt cave unique in Europe and of a number of lakes with fresh water, this area was <strong>de</strong>clared in 1986<br />

Geological and Speological Reserve. Later (in 2000) due to the presence of an interesting flora and fauna it was<br />

established the value of its natural heritage, and was <strong>de</strong>clared as „Protected Natural Area” with geological,<br />

speological, floral and faunistic importance. In 2007 it was <strong>de</strong>clared „Site of Community Importance” and will<br />

become area of special conservation after the validation of the European Commission. The present study took place<br />

over a period of two years, with field trips in various periods of the year. As for the flora, taxons belonging to over<br />

100 genera were i<strong>de</strong>ntified, Most genera belong to Fabaceae, Asteraceae, Labiatae, Rosaceae and Umbelliferae<br />

families. The statistical analysis showed as biological forms, the predominance of hemicrytophytes. As floristic<br />

elements, the Euro-Asiatic and Central European elements predominated. As regarding the ecological preferences<br />

(humidity, temperature and soil reaction) it has been observed the domination of xeromesophytic, mezothermal and<br />

euriionical species.<br />

Keywords: Natural Reserve, Manz<strong>ale</strong>sti –Meledic Natural Reserve, Romania<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

In 1978, a group of Romanian spelologists, part of<br />

“Emil Racoviţã” Speologists Club from Bucharest,<br />

discover in the sub-Carpathians Mountains at<br />

Mânzãleşti, the longest (300 m), the <strong>de</strong>epest (44 m)<br />

and the most ramificated cavity in salt in the country,<br />

second in the world as oscillation of level, third as<br />

length, wich they named “The cave with three<br />

entrances“ from Sãreni. In 1980 the “6s“ Cave from<br />

Mânzãleşti is discovered, the longest cave in salt<br />

world-wi<strong>de</strong> at that moment (1257 m) and the second as<br />

oscillation of level (-32 m), with numerous<br />

ramifications. Later on, other galleries, were<br />

discovered of a total of 4257 m length, 32 caves<br />

digged in salt, taking the Mânzãleşti cave to the<br />

second place in the world for caves digged in carst of<br />

salt.<br />

Later on, in 1986, the salt carst from<br />

Mânzãleşti becomes a reserve of The Romanian<br />

Aca<strong>de</strong>my from the geological and speleological point<br />

of view.<br />

According to the Habitat Directive 92/43/CEE<br />

concerning the conservation of natural habitats, wild<br />

flora and fauna, the protected areas network Natura<br />

2000 appears in România, which inclu<strong>de</strong>s also in this<br />

network the Meledic Plateau of Mãnzãleşti commune,<br />

Buzãu County, according to Law nr 5/5 March 2000<br />

[1].<br />

The site has the ROSCI 0199 co<strong>de</strong> and is<br />

classified un<strong>de</strong>r category IV (according to UICN) as<br />

Special Conservation Area. The reserve is part of the<br />

Continental Biogeographical Region; its existance is<br />

trying to protect the “Ponto-sarmatic <strong>de</strong>ciduous<br />

thickets” habitats.<br />

Characterization of the “Meledic Plateau”<br />

Reserve<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


Preliminary data on Meledic-Manz<strong>ale</strong>sti Reserve... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 61-66 (2010)<br />

„Meledic Plateau” Reserve is situated in the sub-<br />

Carpathians Mountains, in the Lopãtari Dingle and in the<br />

Slãnic river superior basin (tributary streamof Buzãu<br />

river) (latitu<strong>de</strong> N 45 ο 29’ 49” and longitu<strong>de</strong> of E 26 ο 37’<br />

16”). The reserve has a length of 1.7 km, on the North-<br />

South axis and 1.2 km on the West-East direction,<br />

holding a total surface of 157 hectares, the plateau being<br />

situated at an altitu<strong>de</strong> between 400m and 600m.<br />

In the Eastern si<strong>de</strong>, the <strong>de</strong>limitation is <strong>de</strong>termined by<br />

the Jgheab river (a tributary stream of the Slãnic river),<br />

North of the Meledic stream and West of the Sãrat<br />

stream, the latter tributary stream of the Jgheab Valley,<br />

which emptyes into the Sãrat stream in turn. Out of these<br />

rivers and streams only the Meledic stream has fresh<br />

water, the other streams being also alimented with salty<br />

springs, their water having a brackish taste.<br />

Relief<br />

The Meledic Plateau Slopes are very abrupt,<br />

allowing sometimes to see the structure of the plateau<br />

represented by a layer of clay and sh<strong>ale</strong> on the upper<br />

si<strong>de</strong>, with a thickness of 10 to 30 meters, un<strong>de</strong>r which<br />

there is the block of salt, tall up to a few hundred meters.<br />

The Meledic Reserve represents one of the most<br />

unprece<strong>de</strong>nted places, the relief is expanding on the salt<br />

located on the surface or shallow <strong>de</strong>pth, resulting one of<br />

the most interesting regions in our country. A very<br />

diversified terrain in shape and size <strong>de</strong>velops because of<br />

the dissolution of salt on slopes (Fig.1, Fig.2).<br />

Fig.1. Aspect of the abrupt slopes in Plateau<br />

Meledic Reserve (south view)<br />

62<br />

Fig.2. Aspect of the abrupt slopes in Plateau<br />

Meledic Reserve (vest view)<br />

On the western si<strong>de</strong> we can notice blocks of salt<br />

integrated in clay and salty sh<strong>ale</strong>, on which gaps and<br />

limestones have <strong>de</strong>veloped, in comparison with the<br />

southern si<strong>de</strong> where vein of salt can be noticed even on<br />

the surface. Where the salty water rivers come out on<br />

the surface arises a rapid vaporisation of the water<br />

resulting in especially beautiful salt cristals.<br />

The plateau is located on the upper si<strong>de</strong> of the<br />

reserve and is crossed by sinkholes, closed dingles,<br />

oval or round, with a diameter that can reach<br />

sometimes 40 m and a <strong>de</strong>pth of 25 m, wi<strong>de</strong>r dingles<br />

results by their blending.<br />

On the bottom of such sinkholes, where the salt<br />

was covered with a <strong>de</strong>nser layer of clay, freshwater<br />

lakes were formed, receiving water only from rain or<br />

snow meltdown. These lakes have karstic origins, all<br />

the un<strong>de</strong>rground springs are salt watered, the<br />

connection with these ending long time ago. The<br />

presence of freshwater lakes on a salt massif is<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>red a unique phenomenon.<br />

Soils<br />

In the Meledic reserve we encounter a large<br />

variety of soils.<br />

On the steep slopes, where the salt layers are very<br />

close to the surface or even on the surface, we find the<br />

white alkali. On the slopes where the water carries<br />

small amounts of silt the vertisols are formed, on<br />

heavy clay rocks (with high clay content).<br />

On the plateau we meet halomorphous soils,<br />

which have a high content of soluble salt, that occur on


Daciana Sava et al. / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 61-66 (2010)<br />

partially covered with sediment surfaces. A great<br />

diversity of halophile species <strong>de</strong>velop here.<br />

In sinkholes where the sedimented clay have<br />

allowed the formation of lakes, the soils are<br />

hydromorphic, formed due to an excess of moisture,<br />

which can be permanent or temporary. In areas where<br />

the water has a permanent stagnation, the pseudogleic<br />

soil is formed. The plant species <strong>de</strong>veloping here are<br />

thermophilic.<br />

In forested areas we can find reddish brown<br />

forest soils, especially clay soils. In these areas we<br />

especially find Pontic or Mediterranean species.<br />

Climate<br />

The sub-Carpathians Mountains have a<br />

temperate-continental climate, with regional<br />

differences imposed by the shape of relief, but also by<br />

the position at the intersection of climate influences<br />

northwest, eastern and southern.<br />

Being located in a lowland area of the sub-<br />

Carpathians, the Meledic Plateau has a low hill<br />

climate with a ten<strong>de</strong>ncy of aridity in summer. The<br />

average annual temperatures fit between 6 ο C and 8 ο<br />

C. The average annual temperature of the col<strong>de</strong>st<br />

month, January, is of 3 ο C, and of the hottest month,<br />

July, is of 18 ο C.<br />

The average annual rainfall is around 700-800<br />

mm. The largest amount of rainfall is in May and<br />

June, and the driest months are September and<br />

October.<br />

2. Material and Methods<br />

Field trips have been organized for the flora<br />

studies in the Meledic Reserve from Mânzãleşti: two<br />

trips in the months of May and June (months that<br />

have a rapid vegetation <strong>de</strong>velopment), and in the<br />

months of April, July, August, September only one<br />

trip, through the years 2007-2008 to catch the<br />

different stages of vegetation (vernal and estival).<br />

After rating, we ma<strong>de</strong> up a floristic list, in which<br />

the plants have been placed in the right systematic<br />

units [1, 2, 3]. Based on this list, we ma<strong>de</strong> out: the<br />

systematic analysis of the vegetation, the bioform<br />

spectrum, the geoelements spectrum, the spectrum for<br />

ecological preferences: humidity, temperature and<br />

soil reaction [4, 5].<br />

63<br />

3. Results and Discussions<br />

Due to the field trip a total of 133 taxa were registered.<br />

The following taxa were i<strong>de</strong>ntified in the study area: Acer<br />

campestre L. Ph (MM); Eur.; U2,5 T3 R3, Achillea<br />

millefolium L. H; Euras.; U4 T3 R0 , Adonis aestivalis L.<br />

Th; Euras; U3T4 R3, Agrimonia eupatoria L. H; Euras.; U2,5<br />

T3 R4, Ajuga genevensis L. H; Euras.; U2,5 T3 R4 , Alisma<br />

plantago-aquatica L. HH; Cosm.; U6 T0 R0, Alnus incana<br />

(L) Moench Ph (MM); Eur.;U4 T2 R4, Alnus viridis<br />

(Chaix.) DC Ph (MM);Alp.-eur;U3,5 T2,5R3, Anchusa<br />

officinalis L. limba boului); TH; Eur.; U2 T3,5 R0, Anemone<br />

nemorosa L. G; Eur; U3,5 T4 R0, Anemone ranunculoi<strong>de</strong>s<br />

L. G; Eur; U3,5 T3 R4, Artemisia vulgaris L. H; Circ.;U3 T3<br />

R4, Astragalus onobrychis L. H; Euras.; U1,5 T3,5R4,5,<br />

Ballota nigra L. Th; Centr. Eur.); U3 T3,5 R0, Betonica<br />

officinalis L .(Stachys officinbalis L.) H; Euras.; U3 T3 R3,<br />

Brassica rapa L.Th; Med; U3 T3 R4, Campanula<br />

rapunculoi<strong>de</strong>s L. H; Euras.; U3 T2 R0, Capsela bursapastoris<br />

Medicus Th; Cosm; U3 T0 R0, Carex digitata L.<br />

H; Euras.; U3 T3R3, Carum carvi L. TH; Euras.; U3,5 T3 R3,<br />

Centaurea spinulosa Roch. H; Centr. Eur.; U2,5 T0 R3,<br />

Centaurea nervosa Willd. H; Alp.-eur.;U3 T0 R3;<br />

Centaurium umbellatum Gilib. Th; Centr.eur.;U3 T3 R2,<br />

Chaerophyllum bulbosum L. TH; Centr. Eur; U4 T3,5 R4,5,<br />

Chrysanthemum leucanthemum L. H; Euras.; U 3T3,5 R3,<br />

Chrysanthemum corymbosum L. H; Euras.; U3 T3 R3,<br />

Clematis vitalba L. Ph ; Centr. Eur.; U3 T3 R3, Colchicum<br />

autumn<strong>ale</strong> L. G; Eur; U3,5 T3 R4, Coronilla varia L. H;<br />

Centr. Eur.; U2 T3 R4, Cornus mas L. Ph (M); Pont. medit.;<br />

U2 T3,5 R4, Cornus sanguinea L. Ph (M);Centr. Eur); U3 T3<br />

R4, Corylus avellana L. Ph (M); Eur.; U3 T3 R3, Crataegus<br />

monogyna Jacq. Ph (M); Euras.;U2,5 T3 R3, Cytisus<br />

hirsutus L. Ph (N); Centr. Eur.; U2,5 T3 R2, Daucus carota<br />

L. TH; Euras.; U2,5 T3 R0, Delphinium consolida S.F.Gray<br />

(Consolida regalis) Th; Euras; U3 T4 R4, Diplotaxis muralis<br />

L. Th; Centr. Eur; U2,5 T3,5 R4, Draba verna Chevall Th;<br />

Euras; U2,5 T3,5 R0, Echium vulgare L. TH; Euras.; U2 T3<br />

R4, Elaeagnus angustifolia L. Ph (M); Euras; U0 T3 R4,5,<br />

Epipactis atropurpurea Raf G; Euras.; U2 T0 R4,5,<br />

Equisetum arvense L. G.; Cosm.; U3 T3 R0, Erigeron<br />

cana<strong>de</strong>nsis L. Th; Adv.; U2,5 T0 R0, Eryngium campestre<br />

L. H; Pont. medit.; U1 T5 R4 , Euphorbia cyparissias L. H;<br />

Eur.; U2 T3 R4, Euphrasia rostkoviana Hayne. Th; Centr.<br />

Eur.; U3 T3 R3, Fagus sylvatica L. Ph (MM); Centr. Eur.;<br />

U3 T3 R0, Festuca pratensis Hudson H; Euras; U3,5 T0 R0,<br />

Ficaria verna L. (Ranunculus ficaria Huds.) H;Euras: U3,5


Preliminary data on Meledic-Manz<strong>ale</strong>sti Reserve... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 61-66 (2010)<br />

T3 R3, Filipendula ulmaria Maxim. H; Euras: U4,5 T2<br />

R0, Fragaria viridis Duch. H; Euras.; U2 T4 R3,<br />

Fraxinus ornus L. Ph (M); Medit.; U1,5 T3,5 R5, Gagea<br />

pratensis Dumort. G; Eur; U2 T3 R3, Galanthus nivalis<br />

L. G; Centr. Eur.; U3,5 T3 R4, Galium verum L. H;<br />

Euras.; U2,5 T2,5 R0, Galium vernum Scop. H; Euras; U3<br />

T2 R2, Hippophae rhamnoi<strong>de</strong>s L. Ph (M); Euras.; U0 T3<br />

R4,5, Hypericum perforatum L. H; Euras.; U3 T3 R0,<br />

Juniperus communis L. Ph (M); Circ.; U2 T0 R0,<br />

Knautia arvensis (L.) Coult. H; Eur.; U2,5 T3 R0,<br />

Knautia silvatica Duby. H; Centr. Eur; U2 T3 R0, Larix<br />

<strong>de</strong>cidua Miller Ph (MM); Carp; U2,5T0 R0, Lathyrus<br />

tuberosus L. H; Euras.; U2 T4 R4, Lathyrus pratensis L.<br />

H; Euras; U3,5 T3 R4, Leontodon hispidus L. H;<br />

Euras.;U2,5 T0 R0, Lepidium draba Desv. H; Euras: U2<br />

T4 R4, Linum austriacum L. H; Euras.; U1,5 T3,5 R4,<br />

Lithospermum purpureo-caeruleum L. H; CentrEur;U2<br />

T3,5 R4, Lythrum salicaria L. H; Circ.; U4 T3 R0,<br />

Medicago lupulina L. Th ; Euras.; U2,5 T3 R4, Medicago<br />

falcata L.Th; Euras.; U2 T3 R4, Melampyrum arvense L.<br />

Th; Eur.; U2 T3,5 R4,5 , Melilotus officinalis (L.) Pallas<br />

Th; Euras.; U2,5 T3,5 R0, Morus nigra L. Ph (MM); Adv;<br />

U2 T3,5 R4, Muscari comosum (L. ) Miller G; Eur.; U1,5<br />

T3,5 R0, Myosotis sylvatica Hoffm. H; Euras: U3,5 T3 R3,<br />

Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.H; Euras.; U2 T3 R0 , Orchis<br />

purpurea Huds. G; Centr. Eur.;U 2,5 T4 R4,5, Origanum<br />

vulgare L. H; Euras.;U2,5 T3 R3, Orlaya grandiflora L.<br />

Th; Med; U2 T3,5 R4, Ornithogalum refractum Kit. G;<br />

Balc-Pan- Cauc; U2 T3,5 R4, Phragmites australis<br />

Steu<strong>de</strong>l HH; Cosm.; U5 T0 R4, Picea excelsa Link Ph.<br />

(MM); Centr. Eur.; U0 T0 R0, Pinus sylvestris L.<br />

Ph.(MM); Euras.; U0 T0 R0, Plantago media L. H;<br />

Euras; U2,5 T0 R4,5, Poa pratensis L. H; Circ: U3 T0 R0,<br />

Polygala amara L. H; Eur.; U0 T2 R4,5, Polygala major<br />

Jacq. H; Pont. –medit.; U2 T3 R4,5, Potamogeton natans<br />

L. HH; Cosm.; U6 T 2,5 R4, Potentilla reptans L. H;<br />

Cosm; U3,5 T0 R4, Potentilla argentea L. H; Euras; U2T4<br />

R2, Primulla officinalis Hill. H; Euras.;U3 T2 R5,<br />

Prunella vulgaris L. H ; Circ. U3 T3 R0, Prunella<br />

grandiflora (L.) Scholler H; Eur.; U3 T3 R4,5, Prunus<br />

cerasifera Ehrh. Ph (M); Euras: U2 T4 R0, Pyrus<br />

piraster Burgsd. Ph (M); Eur; U2 T3 R4, Quercus<br />

d<strong>ale</strong>champii Ten. Ph (MM); Medit; U2,5 T3 R0,<br />

Ranunculus arvensis L. Th; Euras.; U3 T3 R0,<br />

Rhinanthus minor L. Th; Eur.; U3 T0 Ro, Rosa canina<br />

L. Ph (N); Eur.; U2 T3 R3, Rubus caesius L. Ph (N);<br />

Eur.; U2 T3 R4, Salix alba L. Ph (MM); Euras; U5 T3 R4,<br />

Salix caprea L. Ph (M); Euras; U3 T3 R3, Salix<br />

64<br />

pentandra L. Ph (MM); Euras.;U4,5 T0 R3,5, Salvia<br />

verticillata L. H; Medit.;U2 T4,5 R4, Salvia nemorosa L. H;<br />

Centr. Eur.; U2,5 T4 R3, Scabiosa ochroleuca L. H; Euras.;<br />

U2 T4 R4, Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani (Gmelin)<br />

Palla HH;Euras.; U5,5 T4 R5, Senecio vernalis Waldst et.<br />

Kit.<br />

Th; Euras.;U2,5 T4 R0, Silene vulgaris Garke H; Euras: U3<br />

T3 R4, Sinapis arvensis L. Th; Euras.; U3 T4 R4,<br />

Sisymbrium sophia Webb. Th; Euras; U2,5 T4 R4, Stachys<br />

lanata Jacq. H; Medit.; U2 T0 R0, Thlaspi perfoliatum L.<br />

Th; Euras; U2,5 T3,5 R4,5, Thymus glabrescens Willd. Ch;<br />

Pont.-pan.; U2 T4 R0, Tilia cordata Miller Ph (MM); Eur.;<br />

U3 T3 R3, Tragopogon pratensis L. H; Euras.; U3 T2 R3,<br />

Trifolium campestre Schreb. Th; Eur; U3 T3 R0, Trifolium<br />

medium L. H; Euras.; U3 T3 R0, Typha angustifolia L.<br />

HH; Circ.; U6 T4 R0, Ulmus laevis Pall. (velniş); Ph (MM);<br />

Eur.; U4 T3 R3, Veronica chamaedrys L. Ch; Euras.; U3 T0<br />

R0, Veronica arvensis L. Th; Eur; U2,5 T3 R,Veronica<br />

teucrium L Ch; Euras.; U1,5 T4 R4,5, Vicia angustifolia L.<br />

Th; Euras.; U2 T3 R 0, Vicia sepium L. H; Euras.; U3 T3 R3,<br />

Vicia cracca L. H; Euras; U3 T0 R3, Vicia hirsuta S.F.<br />

Gray. Th; Euras; U2.5 T3,5 R4, Viola arvensis Murr. Th;<br />

Cosm.; U3 T3 R0, Viola hirta L. H; Euras.; U2 T3 R4, Viola<br />

tricolor L. Th; Euras.; U2,5 T3 R0.<br />

Statistic flora analysis<br />

Taxa found in the reserve belong to 4 classes, 43<br />

families and 133 species. The largest number of species has<br />

the following families: Fabaceae (16 species), Labiatae,<br />

Rosaceae and Compositae (10 species each),<br />

Scrophulariaceae, Umbelliferae (5 species each), the other<br />

families were represented by only 1, 2, or 3 species each.<br />

Analysis of the biological forms<br />

Analyzing the spectrum of the biological forms we<br />

discover that in the reserve hemicryptophyte dominate<br />

(41%) from the species i<strong>de</strong>ntified. These are followed<br />

(21%) by the phanerophytes which together with therophites<br />

(24%) form another 43% from the biological forms, the rest<br />

being represented by the geophytes and the helohydrophytes<br />

(Fig.3).


4%<br />

8%<br />

20%<br />

2%<br />

Daciana Sava et al. / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 61-66 (2010)<br />

4%<br />

21%<br />

41%<br />

H Ph Ch G HH Th TH<br />

Fig.3. Analysis of the biological forms<br />

Analysis of the floristic elements<br />

The analysis of the floristic elements mark out the<br />

dominant euro Asiatic elements, which among those<br />

central European sum up approximately 82 species<br />

(70%) from the reserve flora, forming more than half the<br />

floral elements which means that they constitute the<br />

floristic background of this reserve.<br />

Mediterranean and Ponto Mediterranean floristic<br />

elements, which are thermophile species found especially<br />

on the sunny slopes, form together 8%. However, the<br />

cosmopolitic species are also remarkable, representing<br />

5% from the total species found in the reserve.<br />

The fact that the reserve in situated in sloppy area is<br />

confirmed by the presence of the circumpolar and even<br />

alpine European at the reserve level, together<br />

representing 7% of the total species (Fig.4).<br />

46%<br />

1%1%1% 5%<br />

5%<br />

2%<br />

1%<br />

5%<br />

2%<br />

14%<br />

14%<br />

Daco.Balc Carp. Balc.Pan. Cauc Circ<br />

Cosm Adv Eur Centr.Eur<br />

Alp Pont Pan Medit Euras<br />

Fig.4. Analysis of the floristic elements<br />

Ecologic study of the cormophytes<br />

Humidity<br />

If we group the plants by their humidity regimen in<br />

which they are adjust to live here, we will discover that<br />

the most dominant are xeromesophilic (U2-U2,5) which<br />

65<br />

are 42% from the total of the i<strong>de</strong>ntified species in the<br />

reserve, these being found in the droughtiest places,<br />

specially on the meadows.<br />

Notable are also the mesophilic (U3-U3,5) which have<br />

a percentage of 37%, and can be found in areas where the<br />

light is scarce or there is an excess in humidity, where the<br />

swamps dry up during the summer but nevertheless have an<br />

excess in moisture.<br />

The xerophilic (U1-U1,5) can be found in 5% and this<br />

shows the hot and arid summer climate, being especially<br />

noticed on the slopes that have a south exposure, covered<br />

with a small seam of clay soil.<br />

In a percentage of 6%, the mesophilical (U4-U4,5)<br />

species that prefer soils from humid to moist-wet, are found<br />

near lakes or where there is an excess in moisture all year<br />

long.<br />

Remarkable is the presence of the hydrophilic (U5-<br />

U5,5) and ultrahydrophilic (U6) species which together<br />

form 5% from the total of species, and can be found in the<br />

ponds or on their bor<strong>de</strong>r where water is present all year<br />

round.<br />

The amphytoletant (U0) species can also be found in<br />

the reserve in a percentage of 6%, being the most adaptable<br />

for these special conditions (Fig.5).<br />

22%<br />

20%<br />

4%<br />

1%<br />

5%<br />

2% 1% 2% 2%<br />

4%<br />

28%<br />

U3 U3,5 U4 U2,5 U5 U5,5 U6 U0 U1 U1,5 U2,5 U2.5<br />

Fig. 5. Ecological spectrum of humidity<br />

Temperature<br />

Mesothermal (T3-T3,5) appear in a percentage of<br />

63%. Mild thermophilic (T4-T4,5) species appear in a<br />

percentage of 12%, which suggests that the climate in the<br />

reserve in a temperate-continental one.The<br />

amphylotolerant (T0) appear in 16% of the total.<br />

The cryophilic (T1) species are missing, and the<br />

microthermal (T5) species appear in a small percentage,<br />

only 1% (Fig.6).<br />

9%


Preliminary data on Meledic-Manz<strong>ale</strong>sti Reserve... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 61-66 (2010)<br />

45%<br />

2%<br />

6%<br />

17%<br />

1% 1%<br />

14%<br />

45%<br />

14%<br />

T3 T3,5 T4 T4,5 T5 T0 T2 T2,5 T3<br />

Fig.6. Ecological spectrum of temperature<br />

Soil reaction<br />

37% of the i<strong>de</strong>ntified species are euroionic (R0);<br />

poor acid-neutrophilic species (R4-R4,5) are<br />

presented in the same proportion; acid-neutriphilic<br />

species (R3-R3,5) can be found in a percentage of 21%,<br />

and the neutrophilic-basophilic (R5) are found only in a<br />

percentage of 3%. The balance of the acidophilic plants<br />

(R2) is just 2%, and those highly acidophilic (R1) are<br />

missing (Fig.7).<br />

34%<br />

2%<br />

10%<br />

3%<br />

20%<br />

R3 R3,5 R4 R4,5 R5 R0 R2<br />

30%<br />

Fig. 7. Ecological spectrum for soil reaction<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

The flora in the reserve is highly diversified, being<br />

represented by the distribution of the species in 43<br />

families, predominant being the families Fabaceae,<br />

Labiatae, Compositae.<br />

Hemicryptophyte (41%) appear in the highest<br />

percentage indicating the presence of the herbal<br />

evergreen species, adaptable to the edapho-climatic<br />

conditions in the areas. Therophites (20% + 4%) are<br />

1%<br />

66<br />

plants mostly found in the northern regions, with an arid<br />

climate, and are presented in the reserve through the<br />

annual or biannual species. Phanerophytes (21%)<br />

presented by trees and scrubs, indicate the presence of<br />

forests in the reserve, as well as the cover of the slopes<br />

with scrubs which assure its stabilization.<br />

The analysis of the floristic elements reveals the<br />

predominant Euro-Asian elements, which along the central<br />

European totalize approximately 82 species (70%) from<br />

the reserve flora, representing the floristic background of<br />

the reserve. Floristic Mediterranean and Ponto<br />

Mediterranean elements, which are theomophilic species,<br />

can be found on<br />

the sunny slopes. The fact that the reserve in situated in a<br />

hill area can also be acknowledged because of the<br />

circumpolar and even alpine European species found here.<br />

The presence of xeromesophitic species (U2-U2,5) in a<br />

percentage that represents almost half of the total of the<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntified species in the reserve (42%), indicate a arid<br />

climate which is specially caracteristical for the medows.<br />

The mesophilic species (U3-U3,5 ), which have a pretty<br />

high percentage (37%), can be found in the areas where the<br />

light is scarce or it is excessively moisturized or in the<br />

areas where the swamps completely dry out during<br />

summer, but remain excessively moisturized. The<br />

mesothermal (T3-T3,5) along the mild thermophilic (T4-<br />

T4,5) are presented in a higher percentage, which mean that<br />

the climate in the reserve is a temperate continental one.<br />

Regarding the distribution according to the reaction of the<br />

soil, the euroionic species (R0) can be found in a pretty<br />

high percentage (34%), almost equal to those of the<br />

species and the poor acid-neutrophilic (R4- R4,5) (40%).<br />

Remarkable is also the presence of the acid-neutrophilic<br />

species (R3- R3,5) (21%) which have a percentage that is<br />

worth taking into account; the presence in the reserve of<br />

different types of habitats: rivers (with fresh and salt<br />

water), lakes, meadows, forests.<br />

Studies are to be done in the future to analyze the<br />

interesting and diverse flora of the region.<br />

5. References<br />

[1] MOHAN GHE, ARDELEAN A., GEORGESCU M.,<br />

1993 - Rezervaţii <strong>şi</strong> monumente <strong>ale</strong> naturii din<br />

România, Casa <strong>de</strong> Editurã <strong>şi</strong> Comerţ, București, 201<br />

pp.


Daciana Sava et al. / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 61-66 (2010)<br />

[2] BELDIE AL., 1977- Flora României -<br />

Determinator ilustrat al plantelor vasculare, vol. I-<br />

II, Editura Aca<strong>de</strong>miei R.S.R, 406 pp.<br />

[3] CIOCÂRLAN V., 2000 - Flora ilustratã a<br />

României, Editura Ceres, Bucureşti, 1138 pp.<br />

[4] DONIŢÃ N., IVAN D., 1975 - Meto<strong>de</strong> practice<br />

pentru studiul ecologic <strong>şi</strong> geografic al vegetaţiei:<br />

112-331, Editura Didacticã <strong>şi</strong> Pedagogicã,<br />

Bucureşti.<br />

[5] SANDA V., POPESCU A., DOLTU I., DONIŢÃ<br />

N., 1983 - Caracterizarea ecologicã <strong>şi</strong><br />

fitocenologicã a speciilor spontane din flora<br />

României, “Ecological and phytocoenologyical<br />

characterisation of the spontaneous species in<br />

Romanian flora” in: Nat.Scienc.Suppl. 25,<br />

Stud.Communic. Muz. Brukental, Sibiu, 126 pp.<br />

67


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE BIOMETRICAL AND PHYTOBIOLOGICAL STUDY<br />

ON WILD GARLIC<br />

Mariana LUPOAE*, Dragomir COPREAN*, Rodica DINICĂ**,Paul LUPOAE***<br />

* Ovidius University Constanţa, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences<br />

Street Mamaia, nr. 124, Constanţa, 900527, România, mariana_lupoaie@yahoo.com<br />

** Dunărea <strong>de</strong> Jos University Galaţi, Faculty of Science, Street Domnească no. 47, 800008, Galaţi,<br />

rodinica@ugal.ro<br />

*** Natural Sciences Museum Complex Galaţi-Botanical Gar<strong>de</strong>n, Street Regiment 11 Siret no. 6A, 800340<br />

Galaţi, paul_lupoae@yahoo.com<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: The purpose of our study was the biometrical and phytobiological analysis of leafs and bulbs on wild<br />

garlic. This species grows spontaneously in the Romanian flora and was harvested for obtaining the drugs on<br />

Măcin Mountains (Luncavita Forest), at altitu<strong>de</strong>s of 150÷200m. By macroscopic examinations in different<br />

phenophasis established in the area study exten<strong>de</strong>d population with Allium ursinum L. ssp. ucrainicum Kleopow<br />

et Oxner (Fam. Alliaceae). The biometrical calculation have been performed according to the literature, early<br />

spring, in months february, march, april and may of year 2010. Leaves finesse expressed by l/L is different:<br />

march l/L=32÷37%; april l/L=22÷30%; may l/L=16÷28%. Language leaf mature surface is between 71,24÷145,2<br />

cm². Average mass bulbs = 2,4 g/buc and length by 12 mm to 50 mm.<br />

Keywords: wild garlic; Allium ursinum L. subsp. ucrainicum; leafes and bulbs; biometry.<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The Allium genus inclu<strong>de</strong>s approximately 500<br />

species spread worldwi<strong>de</strong>. Allium ursinum L. is a<br />

monocots on family Alliaceae and is wi<strong>de</strong>ly in<br />

Europa, Asia Minor, Caucasus, Siberia up to the<br />

Kamchatka Peninsula.<br />

In Romania this species ”mezohigrofita” grows<br />

in frequent clusters at the shadows of the trees. It has<br />

elliptical-lanceolat leaves with white flowers grouped<br />

and from the biochemical point consist through the<br />

presence of the ether oils with sulfur, that are giving<br />

their own smell [1-3].<br />

Un<strong>de</strong>r various popular names- buckrams, wild<br />

garlic, broad-leaved garlic, wood garlic, sremuš or<br />

bear's garlic- this species is used by locals in<br />

preparations for spring salad and is very appreciated<br />

for many qualities.<br />

They have been shown to have applications as<br />

antimicrobial, antithrombotic, antitumor,<br />

hypolipidaemic, antiarthritic and hypoglycemic<br />

agents [4-8].<br />

The last researches about the population of A.<br />

ursinum from Romania put in evi<strong>de</strong>nce differences of<br />

biomass <strong>de</strong>pending of the geographic area and the<br />

local pedoclimatic conditions.<br />

Wild garlic is a plant which grows on soils with high<br />

mineral trophicity and takes place into the<br />

“megatroph” category with the value V= 85-100 %<br />

[9].<br />

The opportunity of this biometrical and<br />

phytobiological studies consist in the representation<br />

of some morphologic-bulbus,folium,flores-by wild<br />

garlic elements harvested from the Luncavita Forest<br />

(Macin Mountains), a plant with high pharmaceutic<br />

potential.<br />

2. Material and Methods<br />

The harvesting of the bilological material that<br />

was realized with the agreement of the O.S. Macin<br />

that manages the area of the Luncavita Forest<br />

(U.P.I.”Izvorul lui Gavrila”).<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


Contribution to the biometrical and phytibiological.../Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 67-71 (2010)<br />

The macroscopic exam served as a review of the<br />

observed characters with free eye or with the<br />

magnifer and as sensory through the perception of the<br />

smell and the taste on the informations contained in<br />

the bibliography of speciality and own researches<br />

[10, 11].<br />

The biometrical observations were obtained<br />

based on the published biometrical calculation<br />

methods. The surface of the leaves was measured<br />

with the help of a mathematic mo<strong>de</strong>l by the summing<br />

of the geometrical figures distributed uniformly on an<br />

sample of 30 leaves [12].<br />

Some representative examples in<strong>de</strong>ntified on<br />

the area are stored in the Herbarium of Botanical<br />

Gar<strong>de</strong>n Galati and of the Pharmacy and Medicine<br />

Faculty of “Dunarea <strong>de</strong> Jos” University Galati.<br />

3. Results and Discussions<br />

A.ursinum grows on big areas in the Luncavita<br />

Forest only in north hills or near the water.<br />

Sometimes this species can be found in other zones<br />

but in low population.<br />

The acompaining flora is composed by different<br />

species like: Corydalis solida, Asarum europaeum,<br />

Corylus avellana, Tilia tomentosa, He<strong>de</strong>ra helix,<br />

Polygonatum latifolium, Scilla bifolia, Carpinus<br />

betulus, Viola odorata, Ranunculus ficaria, Lamium<br />

purpureum, Galium aparine, Geum urbanum,<br />

Anthriscus cerefolium, Muscari botryoi<strong>de</strong>s and<br />

others.<br />

Our observations show us that un<strong>de</strong>r the shrubs<br />

(Corylus avellana) known for its organic requestsrich<br />

soils,<strong>de</strong>ep,loose- and a rich litter,wild garlic<br />

reaches the base of the shrubs [14].<br />

Also,the power of growing and penetration of<br />

the wild garlic was noticed even through the<br />

woody,half<strong>de</strong>scomposed fragments (Fig. 1).<br />

Simple bulbs or two united can be found at a<br />

relative <strong>de</strong>pth small in the soil (3-5cm) especially in<br />

the humus layer and they have good <strong>de</strong>veloped roots<br />

and branched by 3÷15cm length (Fig.2). The<br />

appearance of the leaves are leveled:first in March,<br />

the second simultaneous with the third (by case). The<br />

most of the plants have two leaves.<br />

68<br />

Fig. 1. The escape of the wild garlic through<br />

the wood fragments ( original photo)<br />

Biometric analysis consists of the following<br />

items (Table 1): the leaf length (L), the leaf width (l),<br />

the petiole length (Lp), the percentage ratio-leaf<br />

finesse (l/L), number ribs (R), mass of green leafs<br />

(M).<br />

On the bulbs (Table 2, Fig. 4) were measured<br />

the length (L), the mass (M), diameter (D) and<br />

number of the roots (No.roots).<br />

Our biometric studies ma<strong>de</strong> on the leaves of<br />

A.ursinum shou that the rapport between the width<br />

and the length of the limb leaf is conversely<br />

proportional with the procedure of growing (Fig.3):in<br />

March l/L=32÷37%; in April l/L=22÷30%; in May<br />

l/L=16÷28%.<br />

The form of the leaves at the immature plant<br />

from March is predominant ovat-eliptical and at<br />

mature in May is elliptical lanceolat.<br />

The growing in length of the petiole is more<br />

pronounced in April 104÷280mm.<br />

The arch parallel nervatiune is numerical<br />

constant in all of the phases.<br />

The surface of the limb leaf mature is contained<br />

between 71,24÷145,2 cm² and the weight of the<br />

green leaves is 24,49 g/10 mature leaves.<br />

So it can be confirmed that the foliar biomass<br />

of the population of A.ursinum from Luncavita Forest<br />

is lower by comparison with the morphological<br />

studies on the same harvestes species from Botosani<br />

area ( 35,85 g/10 leafes) [8].


Mariana Lupoae et al. / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 67-71 (2010)<br />

Table 1. Biometrical elements on wild garlic leafes<br />

Months/<br />

Leaf<br />

number<br />

m<br />

a<br />

r<br />

c<br />

h<br />

a<br />

p<br />

r<br />

i<br />

l<br />

m<br />

a<br />

y<br />

L<br />

mm<br />

l<br />

mm<br />

Lp<br />

mm<br />

l/L<br />

%<br />

R<br />

no<br />

M<br />

g<br />

1 145 50 98 34 18 0,71<br />

2 120 45 81 37 17 0,56<br />

3 150 50 100 33 19 0,8<br />

4 110 35 74 32 17 0,57<br />

5 125 44 81 35 17 0,6<br />

6 100 35 75 35 17 0,5<br />

7 148 49 100 33 18 0,75<br />

8 143 50 100 35 19 0,7<br />

9 135 45 88 33 17 0,69<br />

10 149 50 100 33 19 0,79<br />

1 200 60 256 30 22 1,48<br />

2 210 60 280 28 22 1,5<br />

3 157 35 104 22 17 1,04<br />

4 168 39 106 23 17 1,09<br />

5 205 59 280 28 22 1,4<br />

6 195 59 280 30 22 1,35<br />

7 155 35 105 22 17 1,01<br />

8 188 57 270 30 22 1,23<br />

9 190 57 268 30 22 1,26<br />

10 209 60 280 29 22 1,42<br />

1 261 70 359 26 23 2,8<br />

2 185 40 193 22 17 2,31<br />

3 250 70 360 28 23 2,62<br />

4 260 71 360 27 23 2,9<br />

5 240 67 343 27 19 2,38<br />

6 187 41 192 21 17 2,32<br />

7 180 39 195 22 17 1,9<br />

8 259 70 358 27 23 2,79<br />

9 227 37 324 16 18 2,18<br />

10 235 38 325 16 18 2,29<br />

The harvesting of the bulbs was realized in<br />

February before the entry in vegetation of the plants.<br />

In the studied area the i<strong>de</strong>ntified bulbs had different<br />

sizes (Fig.4): max.length=50mm with the diameter<br />

D=7mm; min. length =12mm with the diameter<br />

D=3mm.<br />

The number of roots is contend between 7÷10.<br />

The medium mass of the bulb is 2,4 g/piece.<br />

69<br />

Fig. 2. Bulbus with radix on wild garlic<br />

(original photo)<br />

Table 2. Biometrical elements on<br />

wild garlic bulbs<br />

Months/<br />

Bulb<br />

number<br />

f<br />

e<br />

b<br />

r<br />

u<br />

a<br />

r<br />

y<br />

L<br />

mm<br />

M<br />

g<br />

D<br />

mm<br />

No.<br />

roots<br />

1 30 3,3 5 8<br />

2 14 1,2 4 7<br />

3 25 3,1 5 7<br />

4 50 4,5 7 10<br />

5 40 3,8 7 10<br />

6 13 1,1 3 8<br />

7 20 1,3 5 7<br />

8 35 3,6 6 9<br />

9 12 1,1 3 7<br />

10 15 1,2 4 7<br />

Fig. 3. The percentage ratio-leaf finesse wild garlic<br />

Legend: S1-sample march; S2-sample april;S3sample<br />

may


Contribution to the biometrical and phytibiological.../Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 67-71 (2010)<br />

Fig. 4. Measurements of bulbs on wild garlic<br />

The infloresecense is umbeliform arranged on a<br />

florifera strain that passes the height of the leaves.<br />

The floral stalk leaves from the same place take a<br />

vaulted form. At the base of the stalks there are<br />

bacterias wich form an involucres. The flower is type<br />

3, specific mococotyledonous, and the tricarperal<br />

ovary crushed emits a specific smell of the garlic and<br />

has a sweety taste wich attracts the bugs (Fig.5).<br />

Fig.5. Inflorescence of A. ursinum<br />

From organoleptic point of view there has been<br />

seen the next things: all of the vegetal products<br />

harvested-roots,bulbs,leaves,flowers-they have a<br />

piquant taste and powerful smell of garlic; the roots<br />

have second branches and the bulbs (white-yellow)<br />

are sourroun<strong>de</strong>d by white and transparent<br />

membranes; the green leaves on the both faces are<br />

elliptical lanceolat and the pedicels are smooth, that<br />

means the <strong>de</strong>termination ucrainicum Kleopow et<br />

Oxner [1,2].<br />

70<br />

The informations from literature of speciality<br />

about the <strong>de</strong>termination of un<strong>de</strong>rspecies of Allium<br />

ursinum are very little because of the similarities<br />

between un<strong>de</strong>rspecies ursinum and un<strong>de</strong>rspecies<br />

ucrainium. Even, the difference can be realized when<br />

the plants reach the level of inflorescence.<br />

With the help of the magnifier can be observed that<br />

the pedicels don’t prezent papillae and they have a<br />

smooth surface (Fig.6) characteristic of the<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rspecies ucrainicum [1].<br />

Fig.6. “Pediceli” and ovary “tricarpelar” of<br />

A. ursinum (original photo)<br />

The spreading of the ursinum un<strong>de</strong>rspecies,<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>s areas from Mountains Macin -Greci,<br />

Tiganca, Niculitel- but there is not specified the area<br />

of the Luncavita Forest [2]. Also, the recent studies<br />

realized in North Dobrogea show on the<br />

Gymnospermio-Celtetum Association the presence of<br />

the Allium ursinum species but there aren’t any<br />

references about the un<strong>de</strong>rspecies [13].<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

Our studies realized in Luncavita Forest (O.S.<br />

Macin, U.P. I, “Izvorul lui Gavrila”) shows the<br />

presence of the wild garlic on large areas but only on<br />

north hills near water.<br />

The literature informations of speciality are<br />

confirmed concerning the exigency of the species<br />

against trophicity of the soil and our observations<br />

shows an affinity of the wild garlic by Corylus<br />

avellana.


Mariana Lupoae et al. / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 67-71 (2010)<br />

We found only an foliar dimorphism in the first<br />

fenophase in March when the report l/L is high<br />

32÷37% opposite the values from May l/L=16÷28%.<br />

The mass of the leaves is 24,49 g/10 the values of the<br />

leaves is lower comparative with the population of<br />

the wild garlic from other zones (Botosani) and the<br />

mature bulbs grow until 50mm length with a mass<br />

about 2,4g.<br />

The harvested vegetal products-bulbs,flowershave<br />

a specific smell of garlic.<br />

The fitobiological and biological analysis<br />

permitted us an i<strong>de</strong>ntify in premiere, of the<br />

subspecies studied from the Macin Mountains<br />

(Luncavita Forest) and that would be: Allium ursinum<br />

L. ssp. ucrainicum Kleopow et Oxner.<br />

The investigation of the natural population is<br />

necesarry because of the biosintetical potential<br />

therefore it can be influented by <strong>de</strong> pedoclimatic<br />

conditions from the area of the sampling of the<br />

plants.<br />

The studies un<strong>de</strong>rtaken by us can offer the<br />

premise of the harvest,conservation and processing of<br />

some vegetal products from wild garlic in or<strong>de</strong>r to<br />

improve the farmocognostic researches.<br />

5. References<br />

[1] CIOCÂRLAN V., 2000. Flora ilustrată a<br />

României–Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta,<br />

Editura Ceres, Bucureşti, pg. 919-925.<br />

[2] SĂVULESCU T., Flora Republicii Socialiste<br />

România, Editura Aca<strong>de</strong>miei Republicii Socialiste<br />

România , 1966, Vol. XI, pg.193-266.<br />

[3] TITA I., 2005. Botanica farmaceutica editia a IIa,<br />

Editura Didactica si Pedagogica Bucuresti, pg.<br />

854-863.<br />

[4 ] DJURDJEVIC L.,, Dinic A., Pavlovic P.,<br />

Mitrovic M., Karadzic B., Tesevic V., 2003.<br />

Allelopathic potential of Allium ursinum L.,<br />

Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 32, pg.533-<br />

544.<br />

[5] ONCEANU (LUPOAE) Mariana, Miron Tudor<br />

Lucian, Dinica Rodica. Studiul unor principii<br />

active din specia Alium ursinum recoltată din<br />

flora spontană, publicat în rezumat, Conferinţa<br />

Naţională a Societăţii Ecologice din România,<br />

Galaţi, octombrie 2009.<br />

71<br />

[6] STAJNER D., POPOVIC B.M., Canadanovic-<br />

Brunet J., Stajner M., 2008. Antioxidant and<br />

scavenger activities of Allium ursinum,<br />

Fitoterapia 79, p. 303-305.<br />

[7] ARHANA SENGUPTA et al., 2004. Allium<br />

Vegetables in Cancer Prevention: An Overview,<br />

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, Vol<br />

5: 237-245.<br />

[8] MIHĂILESCU R., Mitroi G. Iacob E. Miron A.,<br />

Stănescu U., Gille E. , Creţu R., Ionescu E.<br />

Giurescu C. , 2008. Obtaining of phytoproducts<br />

for the cardiovascular diseases profilaxy, Note 1<br />

Some investigation of the Allium ursinum<br />

chemical composition , The 5’th Conference on<br />

Medicinal and Aromatic Plants of Southeast<br />

European Countres , BRNO.<br />

[9] CONSTANTIN D. CHIRITA et al., 1964.<br />

Fundamentele naturalistice si metodologice <strong>ale</strong><br />

tipologiei si cartarii station<strong>ale</strong> forestiere , Editura<br />

Aca<strong>de</strong>miei RPR, pag.110-113 .<br />

[10] *** FARMACOPEA ROMANA, 1993. Ediţia<br />

a-X-a , Editura Medicală Bucureşti , pg. 10-63.<br />

[11] BUCUR L.,ISTUDOR V. et al., 2002. Analiza<br />

farmacognostica, Instrument <strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong>terminare a<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntitatii puritatii si calitatii produselor veget<strong>ale</strong>,<br />

Editura Ovidius University Press, Constanta, pg.<br />

7-87.<br />

[12] BERCU R., BAVARU A., 2007. Biometrical<br />

and morpho-anatomical observations on Acer<br />

monspessulanum L. (Aceraceae) leaves,<br />

Contributii Botanice, XLII, Gradina Botanica<br />

“Alexandru Borza” Cluj Napoca, pg. 105-110.<br />

[13] PETRESCU M. Cercetări privind biodiversitatea<br />

unor ecosisteme forestiere din Dobrogea <strong>de</strong> Nord,<br />

Editura Nereamia, Napocae-Tulcea, pg.61-72,<br />

2004.<br />

[14] NEGULESCU E., SAVULESCU Al., 1957.<br />

Dendrologie, Editura Agro-Silvica <strong>de</strong> Stat,<br />

Bucuresti, pg. 184-188.


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

DINITROPHENYL DERIVATIVES ACTION ON WHEAT GERMINATION<br />

Cristina Amalia DUMITRAS -HUTANU*,<br />

*„Al. I. Cuza” University of Iasi, 11 Carol I,<br />

Iasi-700506, Romania, hutanu_amalia@yahoo.com<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: Several dinitrophenyl ethers such as 2,4-dinitroanisol, 2,4-dinitrophenetol, 2,4-dinitro-1-<br />

(octa<strong>de</strong>cyloxy) benzene, 3-(2,4-dinitrophenoxy)propane-1,2-diol or other similar compounds have been<br />

synthesized and tested comparatively to some well-known metabolic inhibitors and stimulators within the<br />

germination experiments. As a result, the weight of the resulted plantlets was diminished by 2,4-dinitroanisol and<br />

3-(2,4-dinitrophenoxy)propane-1,2-diol treatments (1.15 g/lot and 32.03 mg/plantlet in the case of 2,4dinitroanisol;<br />

0.11 g/lot and 22.3 mg/plantlet in the case of 3-(2,4-dinitrophenoxy)propane-1,2-diol).<br />

Dinitrophenyl ethers inhibited seed germination, most probably by blocking oxidative phosphorylation. A novel<br />

mechanism of action of these pestici<strong>de</strong>s was discussed. Consequently,the toxicity processes of these pestici<strong>de</strong>like<br />

compounds and metabolic inhibitors was discussed in direct relationship with their infrared absorbance and<br />

fluorescence quenching.<br />

Keywords: pestici<strong>de</strong> toxicity, dinitrophenyl ethers, dintirophenols, wheat germination.<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Dinitro<strong>de</strong>rivatives, especially the aromatics, are<br />

frequently used as intermediates in the manufacture<br />

of pharmaceuticals, dyes, pestici<strong>de</strong>s and explosives.<br />

They have multiple biological actions, being used as<br />

insectici<strong>de</strong>s, fungici<strong>de</strong>s, herbici<strong>de</strong>s and acarici<strong>de</strong>s [1,<br />

2]. However, Environment Protection Agency in<br />

SUA (EPA) inclu<strong>de</strong>d the dinitrophenols on the list of<br />

national priorities and in concentration of 3-46 mg<br />

dinitrophenol/kg body kill; no antidote is known<br />

(max. admissible dose 70 ppb in water, EPA, 2004).<br />

It is assumed that dinitrophenols hin<strong>de</strong>r the proton<br />

translocation through the mitochondrial inner<br />

membrane and therefore oxidative phosphorylation is<br />

inhibited (ATP is no longer formed and the cells<br />

<strong>de</strong>prive of essential energy supply). It is also possible<br />

that the dinitrophenols act toxically due to the<br />

inhibition of formation of some triplet states (instable<br />

biradicals) by a resonance process with the triplet<br />

structures in the living cells (A. Szent-Gyorgyi-Nobel<br />

Prize, 1957) [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. Because the existing<br />

data are inconclusive and do not support a precise<br />

action mechanism of dintrophenyl <strong>de</strong>rivatives on<br />

living organisms, it was necessary to synthesize some<br />

dinitrophenols and dinitrophenyl ethers whose<br />

biological activity should be tested.<br />

The purpose of this paper is to compare the<br />

biological activity of some synthetic compounds<br />

containing the di- and nitrophenyl moiety with that of<br />

some well-known metabolic inhibitors and<br />

stimulators. Because germination experiments are<br />

easy, cheap, fast and spectacular, the testing of the<br />

action of some action of some known and newly<br />

synthesized substances on living organisms will be<br />

performed using germinating cereal seeds [3-5]. The<br />

possible mechanism of toxicity of these chemicals<br />

and pestici<strong>de</strong>s are discussed in the light of the<br />

biostructural theory by Eugen Macovschi as well as<br />

the chemiosmotic theory by Peter Mitchell [6, 7, 8].<br />

2. Material and Methods<br />

Biological material. The wheat samples<br />

(Triticum aestivum), Henika variety, were taken from<br />

the Agricultural Research Station in Suceava. The<br />

1000 seeds weighed 37.2 g and had a residual<br />

humidity of 12%. Chemical reagents. The reagents<br />

used were of analytic purity (Merck, Sigma,<br />

Chimopar) and the solution and the water slurries<br />

were prepared using redistilled water. Thus,<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


Dinitrophenyl <strong>de</strong>rivates action on wheat germination / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 73-77 (2010)<br />

dinitro<strong>de</strong>rivatives such as 2,4-dinitrophenetol, 2,4dinitroanisol,<br />

3-(2,4-dinitrophenoxy)propane-1,2-diol<br />

and 2,4-dinitrophenyl-glutathione were synthesized.<br />

Several solutions of dinitrophenyl ethers and<br />

dinitrophenols with the concentrations 4x10 -3 M were<br />

prepared. A blank with bidistilled water was also<br />

carried out.<br />

Equipment. The chemical syntheses were<br />

carried out using the organic chemistry lab equipment<br />

of the Chemistry Department of “Al. I. Cuza”<br />

University of Iasi. The experiments and the<br />

germination <strong>de</strong>terminations were performed in Petri<br />

dishes, on double Watmann no. 1 filter paper at room<br />

temperature. The separation and purification of the<br />

compounds obtained were carried out using thin layer<br />

chromatography on silica gel (Kieselgel 60F254,<br />

Merck) and on silica gel column. The infrared spectra<br />

were taken on a Jasco FT/IR660Plus Fourier<br />

spectrometer in the range from 0 to 15000 cm -1 .<br />

Procedure. The germination parameters were<br />

measured according to ISTA recommendations (Seed<br />

Science and Technology, 1993), however we worked<br />

also with lots of 50 seeds which were laid to<br />

germinate on filter paper, in Petri dishes, in three<br />

repetitions. The first count took place after three days<br />

(energy of germination, EG), the second after 7 days<br />

(germination rate, GR). The germinated, abnormal<br />

and <strong>de</strong>ad seeds as well as the resulting plantlets were<br />

counted.<br />

The treatment lasted for an hour, followed by<br />

the distribution of the seeds uniformly in the Petri<br />

dishes, on double filter paper, together with the<br />

treatment solution. The seeds with a visible root were<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>red germinated. The seeds were watered daily<br />

with 5 ml of redistilled water. The plantlets were cut<br />

at the level of the seeds 7 days after, measured and<br />

weighed (height, H, in cm and mass, m, in grams).<br />

Statistics. The results were processed using the<br />

Tukey test [9]. The mean square <strong>de</strong>viation sx of the<br />

samples was also calculated, as well as t factor, with<br />

a view to compare the results obtained un<strong>de</strong>r the<br />

action of different treatments.<br />

3. Results and Discussion<br />

As for the stimulative effect, the most active<br />

substance in these experiments proved to be<br />

resorcinol, which increased slightly by 5.5% and<br />

74<br />

phenylalanine by 6.3% the average mass of plantlets<br />

as compared to the blank. 2,4-Dinitrophenol inhibited<br />

total the germination process of wheat seeds, (Table<br />

1).<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Fig. 1. The biological effect of some nitrophenyl<br />

<strong>de</strong>rivatives and other compounds on wheat<br />

germination. 1 – Blank (water); 2 – DNP; 3 – DNG;<br />

4 – DNA; 5 – resorcinol; 6 – L-β-phenylalanine.<br />

Table 1. The toxicity of 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP), 3-<br />

(2,4-dinitrophenoxy)propane-1,2-diol (DNG), 2,4dinitroanisol<br />

(DNA), resorcinol and L-βphenylalanine<br />

and at concentrations 4x10 -3 M in a<br />

wheat seeds germination experiment.<br />

Treatment *)<br />

1 - Blank<br />

(water)<br />

2 - DNP,<br />

4x10 -3 M<br />

3 –DNG,<br />

4x10 -3 M<br />

4 – DNA,<br />

4x10 -3 M<br />

5 –<br />

resorcinol,<br />

4x10 -3 M<br />

Germination<br />

Rate<br />

(G. R.)<br />

Plantlets<br />

size<br />

(S, cm)<br />

Average<br />

of roots<br />

mass<br />

(m, mg)<br />

90% 6.4+0.6 18.7+1.3<br />

0% 0 0<br />

42% 2.5+0.6 8.6+3.2<br />

85% 4.6+0.6 13.9+0.1<br />

83% 5.6+0.7 18.9+0.2<br />

6 – L-βphenylalanine,<br />

4x10 -3 M<br />

87% 6.0+0.8 19.1+0.6<br />

D (Tukey test) 4.3 1.3 1.2<br />

The height of the plantles treated with 2,4dinitrophenol<br />

(DNP), 3-(2,4-dinitrophenoxy)propane-1,2-diol<br />

(DNG), 2,4-dinitroanisol (DNA),<br />

resorcinol and L-β-phenylalanine and at


Cristina Amalia Dumitras - Hutanu /Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 73-77 (2010)<br />

concentrations 4x10 -3 M, as compared to blank<br />

(water) treatment. It is apparent from the table that<br />

the root mass treatments with resorcinol and L-βphenylalanine<br />

is higher than the control samples.<br />

Number of<br />

plantlets<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Blank<br />

0<br />

40 60 80 100 120<br />

Plantlets size (mm)<br />

Lot A<br />

Lot B<br />

Lot C<br />

Average<br />

Fig. 2. The height of the plantlets of the lots blanck<br />

Number of<br />

platlets<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

DNG<br />

0<br />

20 30 40 50 60 70<br />

Plantlets size (mm)<br />

Lot A<br />

Lot B<br />

Lot C<br />

Average<br />

Fig. 3 . The height of the plantlets of the lots treated<br />

with 3-(2,4-dinitrophenoxy)propane-1,2-diol)<br />

75<br />

Number of<br />

plantlets<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

DNA<br />

0<br />

40 60 80<br />

Plantlets size (mm)<br />

Lot A<br />

Lot B<br />

Lot C<br />

Average<br />

Fig. 4 – The height of the plantlets of the lots treated with<br />

2,4-dinitroanisol.<br />

Number of<br />

plantlets<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Resorcinol<br />

Lot A<br />

Lot B<br />

Lot C<br />

Average<br />

0<br />

40 60 80 100<br />

Plantlets size (mm)<br />

Fig. 5. The height of the plantlets of the lots treated<br />

with resorcinol.


Dinitrophenyl <strong>de</strong>rivates action on wheat germination / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 73-77 (2010)<br />

Number of<br />

plantlets<br />

Fig. 6. The height of the plantlets of the lots treated<br />

with L-β-phenylalanine<br />

Of all the five figures can be seen as only for<br />

seedlings lengths blank if the three lots are very close.<br />

In other cases the range of lengths of seedlings was<br />

higher. These differences show once again disrupting<br />

the <strong>de</strong>velopment of seedlings in the presence of<br />

chemicals, whether stimulatory or inhibitory effect.<br />

Toxicity<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

L-β-phenylalanine<br />

2.4-Dinitrophenol<br />

Lot A<br />

Lot B<br />

Lot C<br />

Average<br />

40 60 80 100<br />

Plantlets size (mm)<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10<br />

Concentration (mM)<br />

Fig. 7 – The biological effect of 2,4-dinitrophenol on<br />

wheat germination.<br />

Toxicity seen in this figure is that of 2,4dinitrophenol<br />

(DNP).<br />

76<br />

At concentrations of 3x10 -3 M, DNP does not<br />

allow the germination of wheat seeds<br />

The toxicity mechanism of these pestici<strong>de</strong>s,<br />

pestici<strong>de</strong>-like compounds and metabolic inhibitors<br />

may be discussed in direct relationship to their<br />

infrared absorbance and fluorescence quenching (not<br />

shown). Thus, all of them have a significant<br />

absorbance at about 6000 cm -1 in IR, corresponding<br />

to ∆G of ATP formation (as previously shown by G.<br />

Drochioiu, personal communication) and quench the<br />

fluorescence of tryptophan and other biological<br />

compounds. Fluorescence quenching of tryptophan<br />

(1µg/µl) was tested using 2,4-dinitro-ortho-cresol<br />

(DNOC). The intense quenching activity of DNOC<br />

was associated with a stronger uncoupling property.<br />

According to Drochioiu’s hypothesis, one must<br />

take into consi<strong>de</strong>ration the fact that the pH<br />

modification could be a secondary phenomenon,<br />

being possible to transfer the energy of triplet states<br />

to the ADP molecule, which incorporates it as ATP.<br />

The transition from an excited state to a normal<br />

state leads to the release or absorption of a proton,<br />

<strong>de</strong>pending on the acid or base character of the<br />

compound that is in an excited state.<br />

2,4-Dinitrophenols act as uncouplers of the<br />

breathing from oxidative phosphorylation, which<br />

results in an intensified oxygen consumption, without<br />

ATP synthesis. Dinitrophenols normally disturb ATP<br />

production within the cellular mitochondria, because<br />

the ATP is the molecule which stores and supplies<br />

energy for cellular activities [6-8]. The present<br />

theories, such as P. Mitchell’s chemiosmotic theory,<br />

claim that, unlike the other enzymes in the<br />

mitochondrial respiratory chain, the ATP pumps<br />

protons from the intermembrane space towards the<br />

matrix. Thus, the energy that the other enzymes in the<br />

chain use to accumulate protons in the intermembrane<br />

space is recuperated. This energy is necessary for the<br />

ADP phosphorylation reaction with the mineral<br />

phosphate, in the presence of Mg ions, the reaction<br />

being endothermic and requires more than 31 kJ/mol.<br />

Present research showed that it is possible for<br />

the dinitrophenyl ethers to act in a non-chemical way,<br />

probably through radical and triplet status formation,<br />

and that the proton translocation could be a<br />

secondary phenomenon in the process of oxidative<br />

phosphorylation. The action mechanism of the<br />

compounds investigated is concordant with Eugen


Cristina Amalia Dumitras - Hutanu /Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 73-77 (2010)<br />

Macovschi’s well-known biostructural theory, but<br />

contradicts Peter Mitchell’s chemiosmotic<br />

hypothesis.<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

Development of seedlings is disrupted in the<br />

presence of chemicals, whether stimulatory or<br />

inhibitory effect.<br />

Dinitrophenyl ethers and phenolic <strong>de</strong>rivatives<br />

displayed a similar pattern of biological activity<br />

inhibiting seed germination, most probably by<br />

blocking oxidative phosphorylation. Therefore, we<br />

discussed a mechanism of biological activity as well<br />

as that of toxicity related to the energy transfer in<br />

biological systems to form ATP. The proton<br />

translocation through the biological membranes could<br />

be a secondary phenomenon, but the most important<br />

event in the toxicity process of dinitrophenyl<br />

<strong>de</strong>rivatives. Further research is still necessary to<br />

clarify the specificity of the biological activity of di-<br />

and nitrophenols.<br />

5. References<br />

[1] BEWLEY J.D., Black M., 1994 - Seeds,<br />

Physiology of <strong>de</strong>velopment and germination,<br />

Plenum press, 2nd Ed., New York and London.<br />

[2] COMĂRIŢĂ E., Şol<strong>de</strong>a C., Dumitrescu E., 1986<br />

- Chimia <strong>şi</strong> tehnologia pestici<strong>de</strong>lor, Ed. Tehnică,<br />

Bucureşti, 188 pp.<br />

[3] DUMITRAS-HUTANU, C. A., Pui, A.,<br />

Drochioiu, G., 2008 - Dinitrofenil <strong>de</strong>rivati cu<br />

posibile aplicatii in medicina si biologie:<br />

mecanisme <strong>de</strong> actiune si toxicitate, Materi<strong>ale</strong> si<br />

procese innovative. Simp. V, ZFICPM, Iasi,<br />

Editura Politehnium, 61-66.<br />

[4] DUMITRAŞ-HUŢANU C. A., Pui, A.,<br />

Gradinaru, R., and Drochioiu, G., 2008 -<br />

Toxicity of dinitrophenyl <strong>de</strong>rivatives used as<br />

pestici<strong>de</strong>s and their environmental impact,<br />

Lucrări ştiinţifice USAMV Ia<strong>şi</strong>, seria<br />

Agricultură, 51.<br />

[5] DUMITRAŞ-HUŢANU C. A., Pui A., Jurcoane<br />

S., Rusu E., Drochioiu G. 2009 - Biological<br />

effect and the toxicity mechanisms of some<br />

77<br />

ninitrophenyl ethers. Roum. Biotechnol. Lett. ,<br />

Vol. 14(6), 4893-4899 pp.<br />

[6] LEHNINGER A. L., 1987 - Biochimie, Ed.<br />

Tehnică, Bucureşti, Vol. 2, 473, 547 pp.<br />

[7] DROCHIOIU G., 2006 - In Life and mind. In<br />

search of the physical basis. S. Savva (ed.)<br />

Trafford Publ., Canada, USA, Ireland & UK, 43<br />

pp.<br />

[8] MITCHELL P., 1978 - David Keilin’s respiratory<br />

chain concept and its chemiosmotic<br />

consequences, Nobel Lecture.<br />

[9] SNEDECOR G. W., 1994 - Statistical methods<br />

applied to experiments in agriculture and<br />

biology, The Iowa Stat Univ. Press, 255 pp.


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

THE ACTION OF SOME INSECTICIDES UPON PHYSIOLOGICAL INDICES IN<br />

RANA (PELOPHYLAX) RIDIBUNDA<br />

Alina PĂUNESCU*, Cristina Maria PONEPAL*, Octavian DRĂGHICI*, Alexandru Gabriel MARINESCU*<br />

* University of Pitesti, Faculty of Science, Departament of Ecology<br />

Târgu din V<strong>ale</strong> Street, no.1, Pitesti,410087, Romania, alina_paunescu@yahoo.com<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: The goal of this work is to study the physiological changes induced by the action of three insectici<strong>de</strong><br />

(Carbetox, Actara 25WG and Reldan 40EC) in Rana (Pelophylax) ridibunda. The animals used in the experiment<br />

were divi<strong>de</strong>d in four experimental lots: two lots of control individuals (first lot was kept at 4-6ºC and the second<br />

lot at 22-24ºC) and two experimental lots in which the animals were treated with toxic substance and kept at 4-<br />

6ºC, respectively at 22-24ºC. The toxic was administrated with intraperitoneal shots (one shot every two days, in<br />

a scheme of three weeks). At the end of the experiment we <strong>de</strong>terminate number of erythrocytes (RBC), leukocytes<br />

(WBC) and glycemia values. We observe a <strong>de</strong>crease in number of blood cell (RBC and WBC) as well as an<br />

increase a glycemia values.<br />

Keywords: Carbetox, Actara 25WG, Reldan 40EC, frog, erythrocytes, leukocytes, glycemia<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

A number of factors have been suggested for<br />

recently observed amphibian <strong>de</strong>creases, and one<br />

potential factor is pestici<strong>de</strong> exposure. The use of<br />

pestici<strong>de</strong>s in agriculture can have effects on<br />

amphibian within or adjacent to application areas [1,<br />

2].<br />

Asi<strong>de</strong> from direct <strong>de</strong>position or drift, insectici<strong>de</strong>s<br />

can reach aquatic habitats via runoff, which <strong>de</strong>pends<br />

on precipitation, soil conditions, and slope of the<br />

catchments area [3]. The effect of insectici<strong>de</strong>s on<br />

large aquatic organisms varies with the test organism.<br />

Frogs were found to be more sensitive and may serve<br />

as a biological indicator for pestici<strong>de</strong> contamination<br />

in waterways [4].<br />

Our goal is to study the effect of three<br />

insectici<strong>de</strong>s (Carbetox, Actara 25WG and Reldan<br />

40EC) in some physiological parameters (number of<br />

erythrocytes and leukocytes, glycemia level) in Rana<br />

(Pelophylax) ridibunda at two heat level (4-6ºC and<br />

22-24ºC).<br />

Carbetox (malathion) is one of the most wi<strong>de</strong>ly<br />

used organophosphorous pestici<strong>de</strong>s with numerous<br />

agricultural and therapeutic applications, and<br />

exposure to environmentally applied malathion can<br />

lead to adverse systemic effects in anurans.<br />

Cutaneous absorption is consi<strong>de</strong>red a potentially<br />

important route of environmental exposure to<br />

organophosphorous compounds for amphibians,<br />

especially in aquatic environments [5]. It is slightly<br />

toxic via the <strong>de</strong>rmal route.<br />

Actara 25WG is a neonicotinoid insectici<strong>de</strong><br />

active against a broad range of commercially<br />

important sucking and chewing pests and it has as its<br />

component the major active ingredient, thiamethoxam<br />

(25%). Thiamethoxam's chemical structure is slightly<br />

different than the other neonicotinoid insectici<strong>de</strong>s,<br />

making it the most water soluble of this family.<br />

Reldan 40EC is an insectici<strong>de</strong> from the class of<br />

organophosphates. The active substance of this<br />

insectici<strong>de</strong> is chlorpyrifos.<br />

2. Material and Methods<br />

Adult specimens of amphibians (Rana<br />

ridibunda), of both sexes, captured in spring (April-<br />

May) from the surrounding areas of the city Pitesti<br />

(Romania) were kept unfed in freshwater aquaria.<br />

The water was changed daily to avoid the<br />

accumulation of toxic substances. After 10 days of<br />

adaptation in the lab, when they were unfed, the frogs<br />

were separated in lots, which were used separately for<br />

the following experiments: two lots of control<br />

individuals, containing animals kept in laboratory at<br />

4-6 o C, respectively at 22-24ºC with no treatment, in<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Pres


The action of some insectici<strong>de</strong>s.../ Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 79-82 (2010)<br />

running water which was changed everyday, (1) one<br />

lot containing animals which were subjected to<br />

treatment with insectici<strong>de</strong> and kept at 4-6ºC, (2) a<br />

second lot containing animals which were subjected<br />

to treatment with insectici<strong>de</strong> and kept at 22-24ºC.<br />

The toxic was administered by intraperitoneal<br />

shots, one shot every two days, in a scheme of 3<br />

weeks. The administered dosage of insectici<strong>de</strong> was<br />

not lethal as none of the subjects died through the<br />

experiment. We used three different types of<br />

insectici<strong>de</strong>: Carbetox (active substance is malathion)<br />

in a dose of 0.01ml/g body weight, Actara 25WG<br />

(active substance is thiamethoxame) in a dose of<br />

0.4mg/g body weight and Reldan 40EC (active<br />

substance is chloropyrifos-methyl) in a dose of<br />

0.01ml/g body weight.<br />

The number of erythrocytes and leukocytes was<br />

microscopically <strong>de</strong>termined with a Thoma cells<br />

numbering chamber, by using a small amount of<br />

blood collected from the heart [6]; the glycemia level<br />

has been <strong>de</strong>terminate using an Accutrend GCT.<br />

3. Results and Discussions<br />

The number of erythrocytes in the frog<br />

individuals subjected for three weeks to treatment<br />

with 0.01ml/g body weight of Carbetox was<br />

significantly affected as shown in Figure 1. The<br />

difference between the number of erythrocytes which<br />

was <strong>de</strong>termined for the control and the ‘treated’ lot at<br />

4-6ºC, an average <strong>de</strong>crease of 16.68% was found in<br />

the treated frog individuals who seemed to be related<br />

to the intense hemolytic activity. At 22-24ºC we<br />

registered a <strong>de</strong>crease with 37.01% in a number of<br />

erythrocytes.<br />

In animals treated with Actara 25WG in a dose<br />

of 0.4mg/g body weight, there has been a <strong>de</strong>crease in<br />

the number of erythrocytes with 35.11% to the<br />

control value for specimens kept at 4-6°C and with<br />

37.42% for animals treated with insectici<strong>de</strong> and kept<br />

at 22-24°C.<br />

We mention that similar results in the number of<br />

erythrocytes in the lake frog were obtained by other<br />

researchers in similar experimental conditions in fish.<br />

Thus, Ponepal [7] found a <strong>de</strong>crease in the number of<br />

erythrocytes in fish un<strong>de</strong>r the action of Actara 25WG<br />

insectici<strong>de</strong>, as well as a <strong>de</strong>crease in the oxygen<br />

consumption. Also, Dhembare [8] recor<strong>de</strong>d <strong>de</strong>creased<br />

80<br />

hemoglobin, the number of erythrocytes, leukocytes<br />

and platelets in fishes were exposed to LC50 of some<br />

insectici<strong>de</strong>s for seven days.<br />

As shown in Figure 1, as compared to the values<br />

recor<strong>de</strong>d for the control individuals of frog, the<br />

number of erythrocytes increases by 51.14% for the<br />

animals which were treated with Reldan 40EC in a<br />

dose of 0.01 ml/g of body weight and kept at 4-6ºC,<br />

while animals treated with the same concentration of<br />

Reldan 40EC but kept at 22-24ºC the number of<br />

erythrocytes increases by 76.88%. Increased number<br />

of erythrocytes un<strong>de</strong>r the action of Reldan 40EC has<br />

also been noticed by Păunescu et al [9].<br />

number of erythrocytes/ml blood<br />

1000000<br />

900000<br />

800000<br />

700000<br />

600000<br />

500000<br />

400000<br />

300000<br />

200000<br />

100000<br />

0<br />

358166.7<br />

481111.1<br />

298400<br />

225608.2<br />

232405.6<br />

301077.8<br />

851000<br />

691888.9<br />

control Carbetox Actara 25WG Reldan 40EC<br />

Fig. 1. The influence of some insectici<strong>de</strong> upon<br />

number of erythrocytes in Rana (Pelophylax)<br />

ridibunda<br />

4-6ºC<br />

22-24ºC<br />

The number of leukocytes (Fig.2) at the two<br />

heat levels registered similar changes to that of the<br />

number of red blood cells as can be seen in Figure 1.<br />

Carbetox insectici<strong>de</strong> in a dose of 0.01ml/g body<br />

weight <strong>de</strong>termined a <strong>de</strong>crease in number of<br />

leukocytes with 87.26% as compared with the witness<br />

value, at 4-6ºC. An intensive leucopenia was also<br />

registered at 22-24ºC, when the number of leukocytes<br />

<strong>de</strong>creases with 101.93%. The number of leukocytes<br />

<strong>de</strong>creases by 28.52% to the witness for animals<br />

treated with Actara 25WG and kept at 4-6°C, while<br />

the value of this in<strong>de</strong>x is lower, 62.06% as compared<br />

to the witness, at higher temperatures<br />

(22-24ºC). Reldan 40EC in a dose of 0.01 ml/g of<br />

body weight was also affected the number of<br />

leukocytes. As shown in figure 2, the difference<br />

between the number of leukocytes which was<br />

<strong>de</strong>termined for the control kept at 4-6ºC and the<br />

‘treated’ lot kept at the same temperature, an average


Alina Păunescu et al. / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 79-82 (2010)<br />

<strong>de</strong>crease of 53.07% was found in the treated frog<br />

individuals. Similar results were obtained at 22-24ºC<br />

when the numbers of leukocytes <strong>de</strong>crease by 68.81%<br />

of the control value. Similar effects have been carried<br />

out by [10] studying the effects of chloropyrifos on<br />

mice.<br />

number of leukocytes/ml blood<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

423.9444<br />

516.3333<br />

226.3889 209.9444<br />

303<br />

195.8889<br />

198.9444<br />

161<br />

control Carbetox Actara 25WG Reldan 40EC<br />

4-6ºC<br />

22-24ºC<br />

Fig. 2. The influence of some insectici<strong>de</strong> upon<br />

number of leukocytes in Rana (Pelophylax) ridibunda<br />

The glycemia level was found to be significantly<br />

influenced by Carbetox insectici<strong>de</strong>. Thus, as shown in<br />

Figure 3, at a concentration of 0.01ml/g body weight,<br />

this in<strong>de</strong>x increases after three weeks of treatment to<br />

61.29% of the control value at 4-6ºC. The same<br />

concentration of this toxic <strong>de</strong>terminate, at 22-24ºC an<br />

increase of blood glucose concentration with<br />

212.09%. It has been reported in several studies that<br />

hyperglycemia is one of the si<strong>de</strong> effects in poisoning<br />

by OP in subchronic exposure and in acute treatment<br />

[11, 12, and 13]. Several studies have <strong>de</strong>monstrated<br />

some evi<strong>de</strong>nce for damage in pancreatic exocrine<br />

function after anticholinesterase<br />

insectici<strong>de</strong> intoxication [14, 15, 16, and 17]. The<br />

stimulation of pancreatic secretion secondary to<br />

cholinergic stimulation seems to be responsible for<br />

the <strong>de</strong>velopment of pancreatitis [18, 19, 20, and 21].<br />

The influence of Actara 25WG is also felt in the<br />

glucose level, whose values are shown in Figure 3. Its<br />

analysis shows an increase of glucose by 85.07%<br />

compared to witness for animals kept at a temperature<br />

of 4-6°C and treated with a concentration of 0.4mg/g<br />

Actara 25WG and 153.05% for the animals kept at<br />

22-24°C and treated with the same concentration of<br />

toxic. Reldan 40EC in a concentration of 0.01ml/g<br />

body weight <strong>de</strong>terminate, after three weeks of<br />

treatment, an increase of glycemia level with<br />

127.41% as compared to the witness value in the case<br />

81<br />

of animals kept at 4-6ºC and with 173.59% in the<br />

case of animals kept at 22-24ºC.<br />

These changes occur due to inhibition of<br />

glucose tissue by the toxic, and inhibition of Krebs<br />

cycle and glicolise enzymes, this leading to<br />

accumulation of glucose in the blood.<br />

mg glucosis/ml blood<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

11.16667<br />

22.72222<br />

18<br />

34.83333<br />

20.66667<br />

57.5<br />

25.38889<br />

62.16667<br />

control Carbetox Actara 25WG Reldan 40EC<br />

Fig. 3. The influence of some insectici<strong>de</strong> upon<br />

glycemia in Rana (Pelophylax) ridibunda<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

4-6ºC<br />

22-24ºC<br />

Analyzing comparatively the influence of three<br />

insectici<strong>de</strong>s (Carbetox, Actara 25WG and Reldan<br />

40EC) upon some physiological indices in Rana<br />

(Pelophylax) ridibunda, we found that these <strong>de</strong>crease<br />

(in percentage) the number of erythrocytes and<br />

leukocytes and increase the glycemia values. Only<br />

Reldan 40EC insectici<strong>de</strong> causes an increase in RBC.<br />

On the other hand, the toxic effect of these<br />

insectici<strong>de</strong>s was proven to be more powerful at 22-<br />

24ºC than 4-6ºC.<br />

5. References<br />

[1] BERRILL M, BERTRAM S, PAULI B, 1997 -<br />

Effects of pestici<strong>de</strong>s on amphibian embryos and<br />

larvae. In: Green DM (ed) Amphibians in <strong>de</strong>cline:<br />

Canadian studies of a global problem. Reports<br />

from the <strong>de</strong>clining amphibian population task<br />

force. Herpetol Conserv, 1:233–245.<br />

[2] GREULICH K, HOQUE E, PFLUGMACHER S,<br />

2002 - Uptake, metabolism, and effects on<br />

<strong>de</strong>toxication enzymes of isoproturon in spawn and<br />

tadpoles of amphibians. Environ Toxicol Saf, 52:<br />

256–266.


The action of some insectici<strong>de</strong>s.../ Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 79-82 (2010)<br />

[3] LIESS M, SCHULZ R, LIESS MHD, ROTHER<br />

B, KREUZIG R, 1999 - Determination of<br />

insectici<strong>de</strong> contamination in agricultural<br />

headwater streams. Wat Res, 33: 239–247.<br />

[4] CALUMPANG SMF, MEDINA MJB, TEJADA<br />

AW, MEDINAJR, 1997 - Toxicity of<br />

Chlorpyrifos, Fenubucarb, Monocrotophos, and<br />

Methyl Parathion to fish and frogs after a<br />

Simulated Overflow of Paddy Water. Bull.<br />

Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 58: 909-914.<br />

[5] WILLENS S, STOSKOPF M, BAYNES R,<br />

LEWBART G, TAYLOR S, KENNEDY-<br />

STOSKOPF S, 2006 - Percutaneous malathion<br />

absorption by anuran skin in flow-through<br />

diffusion cells. Envtl. Toxicol. & Pharm, 22:<br />

263-267.<br />

[6] PICOŞ CA, NĂSTĂSESCU GH, 1988 - Lucrări<br />

practice <strong>de</strong> fiziologie animală. Tipografia<br />

Universităţii din Bucureşti, Bucureşti, 107, 122-<br />

123, 192-195.<br />

[7] PONEPAL MC, PĂUNESCU A, DRĂGHICI O,<br />

MARINESCU AlG, 2006 - Research on the<br />

changes of some physiological parameters in<br />

several fish species un<strong>de</strong>r the action of the<br />

thiametoxame insectici<strong>de</strong>. In: Proceedings 36th<br />

International Conference of IAD: 163-167.<br />

[8] DHEMBARE AJ, PONDHA GM, 2000 -<br />

Hematological changes in fish, Punctius sophore<br />

exposed to some insectici<strong>de</strong>s. Journal<br />

Experimental Zoo India, 3(1): 41-44.<br />

[9] PĂUNESCU A, PONEPAL CM, DRĂGHICI O,<br />

MARINESCU AlG, 2009 - The influence of<br />

Reldan 40EC insectici<strong>de</strong> upon physiological<br />

indices in Rana ridibunda. Lucrări Ştiinţifice<br />

USAMVB Seria B, LIII: 173-178.<br />

[10] AMBALI S, AKANBI D, IGBOKWE N,<br />

SHITTU M, KAWU M, AYO J, 2007 -<br />

Evaluation of subchronic chlorpyrifos poisoning<br />

on hematological and serum biochemical changes<br />

in mice and protective effect of vitamin C. The<br />

Journal of Toxicological Sciences, 32: 111-120.<br />

[11] GUPTA PK, 1974 - Malathion induced<br />

biochemical changes in rats. Acta Pharmacol.<br />

Toxicol., 35(3): 191–194.<br />

[12] RODRIGUES MR, PUGA FR, CHENKER E,<br />

MAZANTI MT, 1986 - Short term effect of<br />

malathion on rats’ blood glucose and on glucose<br />

82<br />

utilization by mammalian cells in vitro.<br />

Ectotoxicol. Environ. Safety, 12 (2): 110–113.<br />

[13] MATIN MA, HUSAIN K, 1987 - Cerebral<br />

glycogenolysis and glycolysis in malathiontreated<br />

hyperglycaemic animals. Biochem.<br />

Pharmacol., 36(11): 1815–1817.<br />

[14] GOKEL Y, GULALP B, ACIKALIN A, 2002 -<br />

Parotitis due to organophosphate intoxication. J.<br />

Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. J., 40(5): 563–565.<br />

[15] PANIERI E, KRIGE JE, BORNMAN PC,<br />

LINTON DM, 1997 - Severe necrotizing<br />

pancreatitis caused by organophosphate<br />

poisoning. J.Clin. Gastrenterol., 25: 463–465.<br />

[16] DRESSEL TD, GOODALE RL, ARNESON<br />

MA, BORNER JW, 1979 - Pancreatitis as a<br />

complication of anticholinesterase insectici<strong>de</strong><br />

intoxication. Ann. Surg., 189: 199–204.<br />

[17] LANKISCH PG, MULLER CH,<br />

NIEDERSTADT H, BRAND A, 1990 - Painless<br />

acute pancreatitis subsequent to anticholinesterase<br />

insectici<strong>de</strong> (parathion) intoxication. Am. J.<br />

Gastroenterol., 85: 872–875.<br />

[18] KANDALAFT K, LIU S, MANIVEL C,<br />

BORNER JW, DRESSEL TD, SUTHERLAND<br />

DE, GOODALE RL, 1991 - Organophosphate<br />

increases the sensitivity of human exocrine<br />

pancreas to acetulcholine. Pancreas, 6: 398–403.<br />

[19] GOODALE RL, MANIVEL JC, BORNER JW,<br />

LIU S, JUDGE J, LI C, TANAKA T, 1993 -<br />

Organophosphate sensitizes the human pancreas<br />

to acinar cell injury: an ultrastructural study.<br />

Pancreas, 8: 171–175.<br />

[20] WEIZMAN Z, SOFER S, 1992 - Acute<br />

pancreatitis in children with anticholinesterase<br />

insectici<strong>de</strong> intoxication. Pediatrics, 90: 204–206.<br />

[21] MORITZ F, DROY JM, DUTHEIL G, MELKI<br />

J, BONMARCHAND G, LEROY J, 1994 - Acute<br />

pancreatitis after carbamate insectici<strong>de</strong><br />

intoxication. Intens. Care Med., 20: 49–50.


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

CHANGES OF SOME PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS IN PRUSSIAN CARP<br />

UNDER THE ACTION OF SOME FUNGICIDE<br />

Maria Cristina PONEPAL, * Alina PĂUNESCU*, Alexandru Gabriel MARINESCU*, Octavian DRĂGHICI*<br />

* Universitatea din Piteşti, <strong>Facultatea</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>Ştiinţe</strong><br />

Str. Tg. din V<strong>ale</strong>, nr.1 Piteşti, România, e-mail: ponepal_maria@yahoo.com<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: This study was carried out to analyze the effects of sublethal and lethal concentrations of Bravo 500<br />

SC, Champion 50 WP, Tilt 250 and Tiradin 70 PUS fungici<strong>de</strong> on some physiological parameters (oxygen<br />

consumption, breathing frequency, number of erythrocytes) of the prussian carp (Carassius auratus gibelio<br />

Bloch). The acute and subacute toxicity of fungici<strong>de</strong>s was evaluated in glass aquaria un<strong>de</strong>r semi-static conditions.<br />

Keywords: prussian carp, fungici<strong>de</strong>, Bravo, Champion, Tilt, Tiradin, breathings frequency, oxygen consumption<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The commercial product Bravo 500 SC is a<br />

concentrated suspension of chlorothalonil (500g / l);<br />

chlorothalonil (2,4,5,6 tetrachlor isophthal-nitrile) is<br />

a contact fungici<strong>de</strong> with curative and preventive<br />

action (works by stopping germination and the<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment of spores) for combating a large number<br />

of pathogens (leaf spots, downy mil<strong>de</strong>ws,<br />

alternarioses, fruit rots, brown tor of fruit, scab) that<br />

threaten the main crops [1]. The fungici<strong>de</strong> is part of<br />

group IV of toxicity; it is not toxic to bees, warmbloo<strong>de</strong>d<br />

animals and mo<strong>de</strong>rately toxic to insects [2].<br />

Chlorothalonil and its metabolites are very toxic to<br />

fish, aquatic invertebrates and marine organisms [3]:<br />

LC50 (96 h) is of 0.25 mg/l for rainbow trout (Salmo<br />

gairdneri), 0.3 mg/l for sun perch (Lepomis<br />

macrochirus), 0.43 mg/l for sea <strong>de</strong>vil (Ictalurus<br />

punctatus), etc.<br />

Champion WP (copper hidroxi<strong>de</strong>) is a fixed<br />

copper fungici<strong>de</strong> wi<strong>de</strong>ly used for control of fungal<br />

and bacterial pathogens. Copper is highly toxic in<br />

aquatic environments and has effects in fish,<br />

invertebrates, and amphibians, with all three groups<br />

equally sensitive to chronic toxicity [4]. The<br />

Champion WP product is toxic to fish and aquatic<br />

organisms (96-hour LC50 Bluegill: 180 mg/l, 96-hour<br />

LC50 Rainbow trout: 0.023 mg/l and 48-hour EC50<br />

Daphnia: 0.065 mg/l).<br />

Tilt 250 (the active ingredient is propiconazole<br />

– triazole fungici<strong>de</strong>) has protective, curative and<br />

systemic activity. Propiconazole's mo<strong>de</strong> of action is<br />

<strong>de</strong>methylation of C-14 during ergosterol biosynthesis,<br />

and leading to accumulation of C-14 methyl sterols.<br />

The biosynthesis of these ergosterols is critical to the<br />

formation of cell walls of fungi [5]. The<br />

propiconazole is non toxic for bees, invertebrates and<br />

soil bacteriae, but is dangerous for fish and ather<br />

aquatic organisms (LC50 values ppm for freshwater<br />

fish species: bluegill 1.3-10.2, brown trout 3.5,<br />

rainbow trout 0.9-13.2, carp 6.8-21.0, catfish 2.0-5.1<br />

and fathead minnow 7.6) [6] , [7].<br />

Tiradin fungici<strong>de</strong> (the active substance is the<br />

thiuram - tetramethylthiuram disulphi<strong>de</strong> TMTD) is a<br />

general use contact fungici<strong>de</strong> with protective action,<br />

third group of toxicity. Dithiocarbamates form a large<br />

group of chemicals that have numerous uses in<br />

agriculture and medicine [8]. It is used to control<br />

Botrytis on fruit and vegetables and in seed<br />

treatment. The 96-hour EC50 for algae growth<br />

inhibition is approximately 1 mg/l (1 ppm), the 48hour<br />

EC50 for Daphnia is less than 0.21 ppm and the<br />

96-hour LC50 for fish is approximately 0.1 ppm<br />

(Bluegill sunfish, 0.0445 mg/l, Rainbow trout, 0.128<br />

mg/l and 4 mg/l carp) [9].<br />

This study was carried out to analyze the effects<br />

of sublethal and lethal concentrations – of some<br />

fungici<strong>de</strong>: Bravo 500 SC (from 0.078125 x 10 -3 to<br />

12.5 x 10 -3 ml/l water), Champion 50 WP (from<br />

0.003 to 3 mg/l water), Tilt 250 (from 0.25 to 4 ml/l<br />

water) and Tiradin 70 PUS (from 0.01 to 0.16 ml/l<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


Changes of some physiological parameters… / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 83-88 (2010)<br />

water) on some physiological parameters (oxygen<br />

consumption, breathing frequency, number of<br />

erythrocytes 0.078125 x 10 -3 and 1.5625 x 10 -3 ml<br />

Bravo/l water, 0.003 mg Champion/l water and 1 ml<br />

Tiradin/l water) of the prussian carp (Carassius<br />

auratus gibelio Bloch).<br />

The acute and subacute toxicity of this<br />

fungici<strong>de</strong> was evaluated in glass aquaria un<strong>de</strong>r semistatic<br />

conditions.<br />

2. Material and Methods<br />

Determinations were ma<strong>de</strong> between January<br />

2004 and October 2009 on prussian carp samples<br />

(Carassius auratus gibelio Bloch), captured from the<br />

surrounding rivers of Piteşti. Animals were<br />

acclimatized for 10 days before the completion of<br />

experiments in aquariums with a capacity of 100 l<br />

and 50 l [10], un<strong>de</strong>r conditions of natural<br />

photoperiodism, a period in which they were fed once<br />

a day (ad libitum), at around 10 am.<br />

After acclimatization in the laboratory, the fish<br />

were separated in two experimental variants (lots of<br />

10-20 fish - average weight 18 g) subjected to<br />

fungici<strong>de</strong>s.<br />

I. Determinations of oxygen consumption and<br />

frequency of respiratory movements at intervals of<br />

24, 48, 72, 96, 168 and 336 hours on all samples of<br />

these lots (<strong>de</strong>pending on survival) on prussian carp<br />

subjected to:<br />

- I.1. Bravo 500 SC in concentrations of<br />

0.00078125, 0.0015625, 0.003125, 0.0625, 0.0125<br />

ml /l water and the control lot<br />

- I.2. Champion 50 WP in concentrations of<br />

0.003, 0.03, 0.3 and 3 mg/l water and the control lot<br />

Tilt 250 in concentrations of 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 ml /l<br />

water and the control lot<br />

- I.3. Tiradin 70 PUS in concentrations of 0.01,<br />

0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.16 ml /l water and the control lot<br />

II. Hematological <strong>de</strong>terminations (after one,<br />

respectively two weeks of exposure to the fungici<strong>de</strong>,<br />

the fishs were sacrificed to achieve intakes of blood<br />

necessary to hematological calculations (number of<br />

erythrocytes).<br />

84<br />

II.1 – fish subjected to Bravo 500 SC in<br />

concentrations of 0.00078125, 0.0015625, ml /l<br />

water and the control lot<br />

II.2 – fish subjected to Champion 50 WP in<br />

concentrations of 0.003 mg/l water and the control lot<br />

II.3 - fish subjected to Tilt 250 in concentration<br />

1ml /l water and the control lot<br />

The fungici<strong>de</strong>s concentrations were <strong>de</strong>termined<br />

by preliminary tests of survival. The introduction of<br />

fish in solutions was done after their mixing and<br />

aeration for 5 minutes. The water temperature was<br />

16-18°C, the "immersion" solution was changed<br />

every 24 hours, and aeration of water was continuous;<br />

the fish were not fed during experiments to avoid<br />

further intervention of this factor [10]. The testing<br />

method was systematic with refreshing solution at 24<br />

hours after the calculations of the day, in aquariums<br />

of 100 l (50 l, respectively) for each experimental lot.<br />

Determination of oxygen consumption was<br />

done by means of the oximetre and Winkler method<br />

and erythrocytes were counted with Thoma chamber,<br />

using a small amount of blood from the caudal artery<br />

on the optic microscope [10], [11]. The statistical<br />

interpretation of the results was performed with<br />

ANOVA (LSD) test.<br />

3. Results and Discussions<br />

The first four figures (fig.1-4) shows the<br />

average frequency of the respiratory movements of<br />

prussian carps exposed to the action of some<br />

fungici<strong>de</strong> (Bravo, Champion, Tilt and Tiradin).


Maria Cristina Ponepal et al./ Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 83-88 (2010)<br />

Fig.1. The influence of Bravo fungici<strong>de</strong> upon<br />

breathing frequency on prussian carp<br />

Fig.2. The influence of Champion fungici<strong>de</strong> upon<br />

breathing frequency on prussian carp<br />

Fig.3. The influence of Tilt fungici<strong>de</strong> upon<br />

breathing frequency on prussian carp<br />

85<br />

Fig.4. The influence of Tiradin fungici<strong>de</strong> upon<br />

breathing frequency on prussian carp<br />

Bravo and Champion have changed the<br />

respiratory rhythm of prussian carps in all<br />

investigated concentrations. For all concentrations<br />

tested the effect of the fungici<strong>de</strong> is initially<br />

stimulating and inhibitory as regards the frequency of<br />

respiratory movements. In two experimental variants<br />

(0.01 and 0.02 ml/l water)Tiradin is stimulating of the<br />

breathing frequency of fish; at the concentration of<br />

0.04, 0.08 and 0.16 ml/l water, the fungici<strong>de</strong> caused<br />

a <strong>de</strong>crease in the respiratory rhythm of prussian carps.<br />

Changes of prussian carps oxygen consumption<br />

exposed to the action of Bravo, Champion, Tilt and<br />

Tiradin fungici<strong>de</strong>s in differrent concentrations are<br />

shown in fig. 5-8.<br />

Fig.5. The influence of the Bravo fungici<strong>de</strong> upon<br />

oxygen consumption on prussian carp


Changes of some physiological parameters… / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 83-88 (2010)<br />

Fig.6. The influence of the Champion fungici<strong>de</strong><br />

upon oxygen consumption on prussian carp<br />

Fig.7. The influence of the Tilt fungici<strong>de</strong> upon<br />

oxygen consumption on prussian carp<br />

Fig.8. The influence of the Tiradin fungici<strong>de</strong><br />

upon oxygen consumption on prussian carp<br />

86<br />

Clinical symptoms observed during fungici<strong>de</strong><br />

exposure (Bravo, Champion, Tilt and Tiradin) of<br />

prussian carp, correspond to observations by other<br />

authors reporting on the toxicity of fungici<strong>de</strong>s [12],<br />

[13], [14].<br />

Common symptoms of initial acute exposure to<br />

fungici<strong>de</strong>s have apparent fish hypoxia, disoriented<br />

(ataxic) at the surface, and mucus-producing effects.<br />

The oxygen consumption was found to be<br />

significantly influenced by the concentration of the<br />

used fungici<strong>de</strong>s.<br />

Bravo 500 SC ,in concentrations of 0.78125 x<br />

10 -3 , 1.5625 x 10 -3 , 3.125 x 10 -3 , 6.25 x 10 -3 and 12,5<br />

x 10 -3 ml / l Bravo, had an overall stimulating effect<br />

on oxygen consumption of prussian carps in the first<br />

phase (with variable duration: 24-96 hours after<br />

exposure) followed by restoration of energy<br />

metabolism after 7 days of exposure to toxic. Tiradin<br />

and Tilt have an inhibitory effect on the energy<br />

metabolism of prussian carps. After 7 days of<br />

exposure to Tilt, for all lots of fish tested, oxygen<br />

consumption values fall below the value recor<strong>de</strong>d<br />

before the introduction of fish in experiments.<br />

Decreased oxygen consumption un<strong>de</strong>r the action<br />

of some pestici<strong>de</strong>s and changes in respiratory rate<br />

(Dithane M 45, Reldan, Tilt,) has also been noticed<br />

by Marinescu [12] and Ponepal [13], [14].<br />

Figure 9 show the changes in the average values<br />

of erythrocytes after one and two weeks of exposure<br />

to some fungici<strong>de</strong>s.<br />

Fig. 9. The influence of some fungici<strong>de</strong> upon<br />

number of erythrocytes on prussian carp


Maria Cristina Ponepal et al./ Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 83-88 (2010)<br />

Champion 0.003 1 1 1 9 9 9<br />

After 7 and 14 days of exposure to three<br />

0 0 0<br />

fungici<strong>de</strong> (Bravo, Champion and Tiradin) we found<br />

0.03 1 1 1 9 8 8<br />

out a significant <strong>de</strong>crease in the number of<br />

0 0 0<br />

erythrocytes. Similarly results were obtained in carp<br />

0.3 1 1 1 9 8 7<br />

by Hughes [15] after a brief exposure to<br />

0 0 0<br />

Methadathion. The <strong>de</strong>crease in RBC after 7 days<br />

3 1 1 9 8 6 4<br />

exposure to some pestici<strong>de</strong>s in fish was observed by<br />

0 0<br />

Dhembare and Pondha [16], Ponepal et al. [13],<br />

Contr 1 1 1 1 10 9<br />

[14].<br />

ol lot 0 0 0 0<br />

The fungici<strong>de</strong> Tilt, in concentration of 1 ml/l Tilt 0.25 1 1 1 1 10 10<br />

water has an stimulatory effect of erythocytes<br />

0 0 0 0<br />

number.<br />

0.5 1 1 1 1 9 9<br />

In experimental variants with Tiradin and Tilt<br />

0 0 0 0<br />

have only been observed three stages of the<br />

1 1 1 1 9 9 8<br />

sympthomatologicycal scheme <strong>de</strong>scribed by<br />

0 0 0<br />

Schäperclaus for the intoxicated fish [10].<br />

2 8 6 3 2 0 0<br />

Neurotoxic effects in rats from thiram exposure<br />

4 7 4 0 0 0 0<br />

has been noticed by Lee and Peters [17].<br />

Table 1 shows the data on fish mortality during<br />

the experiments.<br />

Chlorothalonil toxicity is lower than that<br />

indicated in the literature [2], [3], which is due both<br />

to the testing method (semi-static) and the fact that no<br />

pure chemical product has been used.<br />

Tiradin<br />

Contr<br />

ol lot<br />

0.01<br />

0.02<br />

0.04<br />

0.08<br />

0.16<br />

1<br />

0<br />

10<br />

10<br />

10<br />

10<br />

8<br />

1<br />

0<br />

10<br />

10<br />

10<br />

10<br />

7<br />

1<br />

0<br />

10<br />

10<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

1<br />

0<br />

10<br />

10<br />

10<br />

8<br />

4<br />

10<br />

10<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

1<br />

9<br />

10<br />

10<br />

6<br />

5<br />

1<br />

Contr 10 10 10 10 10 10<br />

Table 1. Lethal effect of some fungici<strong>de</strong> on<br />

prussian carp<br />

ol lot<br />

Experimental<br />

variants<br />

(fungici<strong>de</strong><br />

Conc<br />

entrat<br />

ion -<br />

ml/l,<br />

mg/l<br />

Bravo 0.000<br />

7812<br />

5<br />

0.001<br />

5625<br />

0.003<br />

125<br />

0.006<br />

25<br />

0.012<br />

25<br />

Contr<br />

ol lot<br />

The number of living<br />

specimens<br />

Immersion time (hours)<br />

24 48 72 96 168 33<br />

6<br />

10 10 10 10 10 10<br />

10 10 10 10 9 9<br />

10 10 9 9 8 7<br />

10 10 9 9 8 6<br />

10 10 9 8 7 2<br />

10 10 10 10 10 10<br />

87<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

The fungici<strong>de</strong>s investigated (Bravo, Champion,<br />

Tilt and Tiradin) have changed the respiratory rhythm<br />

of prussian carps. For all concentrations tested the<br />

effect of Bravo and Tilt fungici<strong>de</strong> is initially<br />

stimulating and inhibitory as regards the frequency of<br />

respiratory movements. In two experimental variants<br />

(0.01 and 0.02 ml/l water) Tiradin is stimulating of<br />

the breathing frequency of fish; at the concentration<br />

of 0.04, 0.08 and 0.16 ml/l water, the fungici<strong>de</strong><br />

caused a <strong>de</strong>crease in the respiratory rhythm of<br />

prussian carps.<br />

The fungici<strong>de</strong> Bravo, had an overall stimulating<br />

effect on oxygen consumption of prussian carps in the<br />

first phase followed by restoration of energy<br />

metabolism after 7 days of exposure to toxic.<br />

The fungici<strong>de</strong> Champion, un<strong>de</strong>r the<br />

concentrations of 0.003 and 3 mg/l water, had, after


Changes of some physiological parameters… / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 83-88 (2010)<br />

96 hours of exposure, a stimulatory effect on oxygen<br />

consumption for the prussian carp.<br />

The other two fungici<strong>de</strong>s tested (Tiradin and Tilt)<br />

have an inhibitory effect on oxygen consumption for<br />

the prussian carps.<br />

After seven and 14 days of exposure to Bravo<br />

500 SC (0.078125 x 10 -3 to 12.5 x 10 -3 ml/l water)<br />

and Champion (0,003 mg/l water) at 16-18 ºC we<br />

found out a significant <strong>de</strong>crease in the number of<br />

erythrocytes of prusian carp. Tilt 250, in<br />

concentration of 1 ml/l water causess a increase in the<br />

prussian carps erythrocytes (after 7 and 14 days of<br />

exposure).<br />

5. References<br />

[1] http://extoxnet.orst.edu/pips/chloroth.htm<br />

[2] KIDD H and JAMES DR, 1991 - Eds. The<br />

Agrochemicals Handbook, Third Edition. Royal<br />

Society of Chemistry Information Services,<br />

Cambridge, UK, (as updated). 6-10<br />

[3] DAVIES PE AND WHITE RWG, 1985 - The<br />

toxicology and metabolism of chlorothalonil in<br />

fish. 1. Lethal levels for Salmo gairdneri, Galaxias<br />

maculatus, G. truttaceus and G. auratus and the<br />

fate of super(14)C-TCIN in S. gairdneri , Aquatic<br />

Toxicology, 7 (1-2). pp. 93-105.<br />

[4] HORNE MT and DUNSON WA, 1995 - Effects<br />

of low pH, metals, and water hardness on larval<br />

amphibians, Archives of Environmental<br />

Contamination and Toxicology, 29:500-505<br />

[5] THOMSON WT, 1997- Agricultural Chemicals.<br />

Book IV: Fungici<strong>de</strong>s. 12th edition, Thomson<br />

Publications, Fresno, CA<br />

[6] http://www.epa.gov/ngispgm3/iris/irisdat<br />

[7] http://www3.bae.ncsu.edu/info1/courses<br />

[8] HOWARD PH, 1989 - Pestici<strong>de</strong>s. In : Handbook<br />

of Environmental Fate and Exposure Data for<br />

Organic Chemicals, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea,<br />

MI, pp.4-20<br />

[9] www.epa.gov/HPV/pubs/summaries<br />

[10] PICOS CA, NASTASESCU GH, 1988 - Lucrări<br />

practice <strong>de</strong> fiziologie animală. Tipografia<br />

Universităţii din Bucureşti, p.107, 122-123, 192-<br />

195.<br />

[11] ŞERBAN M, CIMPEANU G, IONESCU<br />

EMANUELA, 1993 - Meto<strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong> laborator în<br />

88<br />

biochimia animală, Editura Didactică <strong>şi</strong><br />

Pedagogică, Bucureşti, 252 pp.<br />

[12] MARINESCU AG, DRĂGHICI O, PONEPAL<br />

C, PĂUNESCU A, 2004 - The influence of<br />

fungici<strong>de</strong> (Dithane M-45) on some physiological<br />

indices in the prussian carp (Carassius auratus<br />

gibelio Bloch), International Association for<br />

Danube Research, Novi Sad, 35: 209-214<br />

[13] PONEPAL MC, PĂUNESCU A, MARINESCU<br />

AG., DRĂGHICI O, 2009 - Effect of the<br />

Fungici<strong>de</strong> Chlorothalonil (Bravo) on Some<br />

Physiological Parameters in Prussian Carp,<br />

Lucrări ştiinţifice USAMV Ia<strong>şi</strong>, seria<br />

Horticultură, vol 52.<br />

[14] PONEPAL M., PĂUNESCU A, MARINESCU<br />

AG, DRĂGHICI O, 2009 - The Changes of Some<br />

Physiological Parameters in Prussian Carp Un<strong>de</strong>r<br />

The Action of the Tilt Fungici<strong>de</strong>, Bulletin<br />

UASVM, Cluj, 2009, 66.<br />

[15] HUGHES G., SZEGLETES T, NEMCSOK KJ.<br />

1995 - Haematological and biological changes in<br />

the blood of carp (Cyprinus carpio) following<br />

brief exposure to an organophosphoric insectici<strong>de</strong><br />

(Methidathion),Abs.Int.Biond.Symp.Cesze<br />

Bu<strong>de</strong>jovice, May<br />

[16] DHEMBARE AJ, PONDHA GM, 2000 -<br />

Haematological changes in fish. Punctius sophore<br />

exposed to some insectici<strong>de</strong>s, J.Expt. Zoo. India,<br />

3(1), 41-44.<br />

[17] LEE CC and PETERS PJ, 1967 - Neurotoxicity<br />

and behaviour effects of thiuram in rats, . Envir.<br />

Health Perspectives, 17:35-43.


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

CYTOGENETIC EFFECTS INDUCED BY MANGANESE AND LEAD<br />

MICROELEMENTS ON GERMINATION AT TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.<br />

Elena DOROFTEI 1 , Maria Mihaela ANTOFIE 2 , Daciana SAVA 1 , Marioara TRANDAFIRESCU 1<br />

1 Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Science, „Ovidius” University, Constantza, University Street No. 1, Bilding<br />

B, Campus, 900552, Romania, email: edoroftei2000@yahoo.ca<br />

2 Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Food Industry and Nature Potection, University “Lucian Blaga”from Sibiu<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: Our study is about the effects of manganese and lead microelements treatment on germination at<br />

Triticum aestivum L. The cytogenetic effects were studied by the calculation of the mitotic in<strong>de</strong>x, by the study of<br />

the interphase and chromosomal aberrations on the mitotic cells. We used MnSO4 and Pb(NO3)2 solutions with<br />

different concentrations: 0.0001, 0.005, and 0.01%. The Triticum seeds were preliminary imbued in water, and<br />

then they were treated for 6 and 24 hours in these solutions. The control group was treated with water. We<br />

prepared five cytological sli<strong>de</strong>s, for each sli<strong>de</strong> we have studied 10 microscopic fields with good <strong>de</strong>nsity of cells<br />

for the mitotic in<strong>de</strong>x and another 10 different microscopic fields for abnormal interphases and chromosomal<br />

aberrations. In the analyzed meristematic cells we observed an almost totally inhibition of cell division and the<br />

mitotic in<strong>de</strong>x was smaller in comparison with the control variant. The study of the frequency of the cells in<br />

different phases of the mitotic division showed that the highest percent was registered by prophases, followed at<br />

distance by telophases. We can conclu<strong>de</strong> that the heavy metals Mn and Pb have a significant mutagenic activity<br />

in vivo upon the radicles of Triticum aestivum L.<br />

Keywords: Triticum aestivum, cytogenetic effects, lead, manganese, mitotic in<strong>de</strong>x, chromosomal aberrations.<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Asi<strong>de</strong> pestici<strong>de</strong>s - the most important „stress<br />

indicators” which are especially used in agriculture,<br />

other very important indicators are heavy metals.<br />

The residual waters resulting from the galvanic<br />

industry contain a real “hurricane” of heavy metals<br />

such as: mercury, cadmium, zinc, copper, lead and<br />

chrome. Generally the water pollution sources for<br />

heavy metals are as following: galvanic industry,<br />

mining, metallurgy and car industry. Copper water<br />

pollution is especially due to viticulture as the<br />

copper sulphate is used for pests’ control.<br />

Lead is eliminated mostly as a result of<br />

burning gasoline, petrol and different dyes,<br />

affecting the central nervous system in humans,<br />

creating behaviour problems and convulsions, at<br />

higher levels being lethal. Lead is spearing no<br />

organ or system being the first incriminated in<br />

boosting or getting worse a series of diseases<br />

through diminishing the body resistance. Lead<br />

effects are usually irreversible.<br />

Manganese is a nutritionally essential<br />

chemical element but also in certain conditions it<br />

can be potentially toxic. Manganese name is<br />

originating from Greek language meaning “magic”<br />

and this feature is still a<strong>de</strong>quate because the<br />

scientists are still working to un<strong>de</strong>rstand different<br />

effects of its <strong>de</strong>ficiency and toxicity effects for<br />

living organisms. However, without doubt in high<br />

levels manganese is highly toxic causing a series of<br />

pathologies based on reactive oxygen species<br />

(ROS) generation.<br />

Long term oxidative stress consequences in<br />

human where associated to the different diseases<br />

pathogenesis and toxicities namely atherosclerosis,<br />

diabetes, chronically inflammatory diseases,<br />

neurological disturbances and cardiovascudiseases.<br />

Manganese induces the oxidative stress in a<br />

time and concentration <strong>de</strong>pending manner,<br />

according to the cytotoxic parameters<br />

measurements, lactate <strong>de</strong>hydrogenase and lipid<br />

peroxidation. Also, manganese may accumulate<br />

into the cell causing cytotoxic effects and cell<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


Cytogenetic effects induced by manganese... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 89-97 (2010)<br />

<strong>de</strong>struction. Following different activity enzyme<br />

alteration and the alteration of gene expression the<br />

intracellular disruptions caused by manganese<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong> DNA helix broken up, chromosomes<br />

<strong>de</strong>struction and lipid peroxidation (Brooks, 1994).<br />

Our research focused in <strong>de</strong>tecting the<br />

mutagenic effects induced by heavy metals such as<br />

manganese (Mn) and lead (Pb) on higher plants<br />

using the cytogenetic analysis in Triticum aestivum<br />

L. as plant indicator for heavy metals polluting<br />

<strong>de</strong>gree in crops.<br />

The toxicity symptoms induced by heavy<br />

metals in plants are the results of some negative<br />

effects on physiological processes including:<br />

respiration and photosynthesis inhibition, water –<br />

plant relationship disruption, <strong>de</strong>creasing<br />

plasm<strong>ale</strong>ma permeability in root cells, adverse<br />

effects on the metabolic enzymes (Arduini, 1994;<br />

Chardonneres et al., 1999; Ouzounidou, 1994;<br />

Vangronsveld and Clijsters, 1994; Vennitt and<br />

Parry, 1984).<br />

2. Materials and Methods<br />

The chemical effects on chromosomes are<br />

often studied on plant material such as root tips as<br />

they are easily produced through seed germination,<br />

the experiments may be conducted all over the year<br />

and are not costly (Bateman,1977).<br />

For studying the heavy metal effect on mitosis<br />

we used solutions of MnSO4 and Pb(NO3)2 in<br />

different concentrations (0,0001%; 0,005% and<br />

0,01%) in which were submersed Triticum seeds<br />

for 6 and 24 hours, in Petri disches. As control it<br />

was used tap water. Fragments of young roots were<br />

fixed into a mixture solution of ethylic alcohol and<br />

glacial acetic acid in a volumetric rapport of 3:1 for<br />

16 h in refrigerator followed by a gentle acidic<br />

hydrolysis in HCl 1N solution for 5 min at 60°C.<br />

The roots are coloured through the Feulgen method<br />

using the Schiff reactive for 90 min followed by a<br />

water bath for 20 min. The sli<strong>de</strong>s were prepared<br />

applying squashing method and the samples were<br />

analyzed in light microscopy for the cytogenetic<br />

effects of heavy metals by calculating the mitotic<br />

in<strong>de</strong>x and revealing the chromosomal aberrations<br />

for different mitotic stages (Doroftei et al., 2008). A<br />

90<br />

Novex Holland digit camera was used for taking<br />

photographs.<br />

Table 1. Heavy metal concentrations and durations<br />

used for Triticum aestivum seeds treatments<br />

Heavy<br />

metal<br />

MnSO4<br />

MnSO4<br />

Pb(NO3)2<br />

Pb(NO3)2<br />

Concentration Variant<br />

name<br />

0,0001% V1<br />

0,005% V2<br />

0,01% V3<br />

0,0001%<br />

0,005%<br />

0,01%<br />

0,0001%<br />

0,005%<br />

0,01%<br />

0,0001%<br />

0,005%<br />

0,01%<br />

In this study 5 sli<strong>de</strong>s per variant were analyzed<br />

and for each sli<strong>de</strong> 10 microscopically filed were<br />

used for mitotix in<strong>de</strong>x calculation and for<br />

chromosomal aberrations study.<br />

3. Results and Discussions<br />

V4<br />

V5<br />

V6<br />

V7<br />

V8<br />

V9<br />

V10<br />

V11<br />

V12<br />

Treatment<br />

duration<br />

6 hours<br />

24 hours<br />

6 hours<br />

24 hours<br />

Analyzing the control untreated roots it was<br />

reve<strong>ale</strong>d the normal feature of the chromosomes<br />

and also normal cell division behaviour with a<br />

mitotic in<strong>de</strong>x of 15 %. Roots <strong>de</strong>velopment was<br />

lower when the Triticum seeds were immersed into<br />

the tested solutions, macroscopically differences<br />

being observed compared to the control. Thus, the<br />

treated roots were smaller and in a low number<br />

compared to the control.<br />

The mitotic in<strong>de</strong>x significantly <strong>de</strong>creased<br />

especially in the case of 0.01% and 24 h treatment<br />

duration for manganese and lead too, supporting the<br />

i<strong>de</strong>a that cell division is slower progressing<br />

compared to the control (Tab. 2). These<br />

microscopically observations are supported by<br />

those macroscopically (root number and size).<br />

The chromosomal aberrations are relatively<br />

diverse, being <strong>ale</strong>atory distributed and <strong>de</strong>pending


Elena Doroftei et al. / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 89-97 (2010)<br />

on manganese and lead concentration and treatment<br />

period.<br />

For a treatment with MnSO4 solution in<br />

concentration of 0.01% for 24 h treatment, it was<br />

observed cells with big nuclei and unorganized and<br />

vacuolated features. The un-organizing process is<br />

due probably to some disequilibrium occurred as a<br />

consequence of genetic material accumulation in a<br />

too big quantity. The treatment with MnSO4<br />

solution in concentration of 0.01% for 6 h treatment<br />

it was observed that the majority of cells were in<br />

interphase and prophase and after 24 h of treatment<br />

cell plasmolysis occurred for non dividing cells.<br />

The treatment with Pb(NO3)2 solution in<br />

concentration of 0,0001% and 0,005%, for 6 or 24<br />

h treatments, induced a <strong>de</strong>crease in mitotic division<br />

frequency. For a treatment with Pb(NO3)2 of<br />

0,01%, for 24 h a significant <strong>de</strong>crease cells in<br />

mitotic division frequency it was registered as a<br />

result of summing the effects of high concentration<br />

and long period of treatment. For this later variant,<br />

nuclei unregulated in shape and size were observed<br />

and chromosome appeared either big with a relaxed<br />

chromatin either small but presenting a compact<br />

chromatin and unregulated shape. For lead too, for<br />

a concentration of 0.01% for 6 h there were<br />

observed predominantly cells in interphase or<br />

prophase and after 24 h of treatment the cell<br />

plasmolysis occurred in the non-dividing cells.<br />

The studied heavy metals solutions may have<br />

according to our results the following negative<br />

effects:<br />

1. slowing down the cell division rate (figs.<br />

1-16)<br />

2. frequent cell <strong>de</strong>gradation appearance (figs.<br />

7,8,9,10,11,13,14 )<br />

3. <strong>de</strong>hydration effect at cell level frequently<br />

inducing cell plasmolysis, more drastically<br />

at 24 h treatment (figs. 9,10,11,15,16,17)<br />

4. heterochromatinization during prophase<br />

(figs. 6,7,8,13,14)<br />

5. changes in the nuclei shape becoming<br />

elongated (figs. 6,7,8)<br />

91<br />

6. <strong>de</strong>gradation of the nucleic material in the<br />

completed <strong>de</strong>stroyed cells (figs.<br />

6,7,8,13,14)<br />

7. an early chloroplasts formatting can be<br />

observed (figs. 9,10,12,15,16,17).<br />

In all variants, comparing to the control, a<br />

<strong>de</strong>creasing in the mitotic in<strong>de</strong>x was observed (figs.<br />

1, 2, 3, 4). We recor<strong>de</strong>d the lack of cells in<br />

anaphase for the following variants: 3, 6 and 11.<br />

For the control as well as for the treated variants the<br />

predominance of prophase and telophases towards<br />

the metaphases and anaphases was registered (fig.<br />

5).<br />

The highest percentage of dividing cells is<br />

registered for the variant no. 1 (4%) and it is shown<br />

in tab. no. 2. The biggest number of cells in<br />

prophase (19) in variant 1 was registered (tab. 2).<br />

For metaphase the biggest number of cells was<br />

registered in variant 7 (14) followed by in variants<br />

1 and 9 (11).<br />

These data support the i<strong>de</strong>a that among heavy<br />

metals, manganese in large quantities impe<strong>de</strong>s the<br />

normal roots growth for higher plants as a<br />

consequence of cell division negative effects<br />

induced for the meristematic cells in Triticum<br />

aestivum.<br />

Faze <strong>de</strong> diviziune %<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Profaze<br />

Metafaze<br />

Anafaze<br />

Telofaze<br />

Fig. 1. Mitotic division phase’s frequency in<br />

Triticum aestivum treated with MnSO4 for 6 hours.


Cytogenetic effects induced by manganese... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 89-97 (2010)<br />

Faze <strong>de</strong> diviziune %<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Fig. 2. Mitotic division phase’s frequency in<br />

Triticum aestivum treated with MnSO4 for 24<br />

hours.<br />

Faze <strong>de</strong> diviziune %<br />

Fig.3. Mitotic division phase’s frequency in<br />

Triticum aestivum treated with Pb(NO3)2 for 6<br />

hours.<br />

Faze <strong>de</strong> diviziune %<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

M t V i t V i t V i t<br />

Fig.4. Mitotic division phase’s frequency in<br />

Triticum aestivum treated with Pb(NO3)2 for 24<br />

hours.<br />

Profaze<br />

Metafaze<br />

Anafaze<br />

Telofaze<br />

Profaze<br />

Metafaze<br />

Anafaze<br />

Telofaze<br />

Profaze<br />

Metafaze<br />

Anafaze<br />

Telofaze<br />

92<br />

Fig.5. Root meristematic cells in control of<br />

Triticum aestivum. It can be observed cells in<br />

prophase, metaphase, anaphase and telophase and<br />

cytochinesis (200x).<br />

Fig.6. Root meristematic cells in Triticum aestivum<br />

treated with MnSO4 0.0001% for 6 h. It can be<br />

observed cells without content and cells in prophase<br />

and telophase. The nuclei are hypertrophic with<br />

obviously hetero-chromatinisations and<br />

vacuolisations (150x).


Elena Doroftei et al. / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 89-97 (2010)<br />

Fig.7. Root meristematic cells in Triticum aestivum<br />

treated with MnSO4 0.0001% for 6 h. It can be<br />

observed cells without content and cells in prophase<br />

and cytochinesis. The nuclei are hypertrophic with<br />

obviously hetero-chromatinisations and<br />

vacuolisations (150x).<br />

Fig.8. Root meristematic cells in Triticum aestivum<br />

treated with MnSO4 0.005% for 6 h. It can be<br />

observed plasmolytic cells mixed with cells in<br />

prophase and telophase abnormal disposed and<br />

containing hypertrophic nuclei with obvious heterochromatinisations<br />

(150X).<br />

93<br />

Fig.9. Root meristematic cells in Triticum aestivum<br />

treated with MnSO4 0.01% for 6 h. It can be<br />

observed abnormal disposed cells without content<br />

mixed with plasmolytic cells in witch we can<br />

observed an early chloroplasts formatting (600X).<br />

Fig.10. Root meristematic cells in Triticum<br />

aestivum treated with MnSO4 0.0001% for 24 h. It<br />

can be observed long cells disposed in lines; cells<br />

are plasmolytic, during prophase and in witch we<br />

can observed an early chloroplasts formatting<br />

(600X).


Cytogenetic effects induced by manganese... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 89-97 (2010)<br />

Fig.11. Root meristematic cells in Triticum<br />

aestivum treated with MnSO4 0.005 % for 24 h. It<br />

can be observed long cells disposed in lines; cells<br />

are plasmolytic, during prophase (600X).<br />

Fig.12. Root meristematic cells in Triticum<br />

aestivum treated with MnSO4 0.01% for 24 h. It<br />

can be observed long cells disposed in lines; cells<br />

are strongly plasmolytic, during prophase and in<br />

witch we can observed an early chloroplasts<br />

formatting (600X).<br />

94<br />

Fig.13. Root meristematic cells in Triticum<br />

aestivum treated with Pb(NO3)2 0.0001 % for 6 h.<br />

It can be observed cells without content alternating<br />

with cells in prophase and telophase, having nuclei<br />

hypertrophic (400X).<br />

Fig.14. Root meristematic cells in Triticum<br />

aestivum treated with Pb(NO3)2 0.005 % for 6 h. It<br />

can be observed cells without content alternating<br />

with cells in prophase and telophase, having nuclei<br />

hypertrophic (400X).


Elena Doroftei et al. / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 89-97 (2010)<br />

Fig.15. Root meristematic cells in Triticum<br />

aestivum treated with Pb(NO3)2 0.01 % for 6 h. It<br />

can be observed long cells disposed in lines; cells<br />

are plasmolytic, during prophase and in witch we<br />

can observed an early chloroplasts formatting<br />

(600X).<br />

Fig.16. Root meristematic cells in Triticum<br />

aestivum treated with Pb(NO3)2 0.005 % for 24 h.<br />

It can be observed long cells disposed in lines; cells<br />

are plasmolytic, during prophase and in witch we<br />

can observed an early chloroplasts formatting and<br />

curly cell’ s walls (600X).<br />

95<br />

Fig.17. Root meristematic cells in Triticum<br />

aestivum treated with Pb(NO3)2 0.01 % for 24 h. It<br />

can be observed long cells disposed in lines; cells<br />

are plasmolytic, during prophase and in witch we<br />

can observed an early chloroplasts formatting and<br />

curly cell’ s walls (600X).<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

Based on the results of this study we may<br />

conclu<strong>de</strong> that:<br />

The heavy metals solutions used in this<br />

experiment have a great mutagenic effect on the<br />

root meristematic cells of Triticum aestivum<br />

After the heavy metals solution treatment a<br />

<strong>de</strong>crease in cell division in rate was recor<strong>de</strong>d<br />

The heavy metals have a <strong>de</strong>hydration effect at<br />

cellular level<br />

In all variants a <strong>de</strong>crease in the mitotic in<strong>de</strong>x<br />

compared to the control was observed<br />

The mutagenic effects <strong>de</strong>pends on the used<br />

heavy metals in the treatment and the treatment<br />

duration<br />

In the treated cells an early chloroplasts<br />

formatting can be observed.<br />

Cytogenetic tests on Triticum aestivum reveal a<br />

<strong>de</strong>crease in mitotic in<strong>de</strong>x after the treatment with<br />

the heavy metals solutions. These results reve<strong>ale</strong>d<br />

that the studied heavy metals present a significant


Cytogenetic effects induced by manganese... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 89-97 (2010)<br />

mutagenic activity. The inhibition of mitotic<br />

division in the root apex induces the root growth<br />

inhibition as an active reaction of the plant when<br />

plants are exposed to the action of heavy metals in<br />

soil. Heavy metal effects are more profound but<br />

they may become visible using further molecular<br />

techniques.<br />

These results are sufficient serious arguments<br />

in the elaboration of prophylactic methods for<br />

pollution combating of surface land water,<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rground water as well as for grounding the<br />

protection measures for ecosystem maintaining.<br />

5. References<br />

[1] BROOKS, R.R., 1994: Plants and<br />

hyperaccumulate heavy metals. In: Plant and<br />

chemical elements, 88-105. Edited by M.E.<br />

Farago. Ed. VCH, Weinheim, New York, Basel,<br />

Cambridge, Tokio.<br />

[2] ARDUINI, I., GOLDBOLD, D.L., ONNIS, A.,<br />

1994: Cadmium and cooper change root growth<br />

and morphology at Pinus pinea and Pinus<br />

pinaster seedling. Physiol. Plant., 92, 675-680.<br />

[3] CHARDONNERES, A.N., BOOKUM, W.M.,<br />

VELLINGE, S., SCHAT, H., VERKLEIJ,<br />

J.A.C., ERNST, W.H.O., 1999: Allocation<br />

patterns of zinc and cadmium in heavy metal<br />

96<br />

tolerant and sensitive Silene vulgaris. J. Plant.<br />

Physiol., 155(6), 778-787.<br />

[4] OUZOUNIDOU, G., 1994: Cooper induces<br />

changes on growth, metal content and<br />

photosynthetic function of Alysum montaneum<br />

L. plants, Environ. Exp. Bot., 34, (2), 165-172.<br />

[5] VANGRONSVELD, J., CLIJSTERS, H., 1994:<br />

Toxic effects of metals. In: Plants and the<br />

chemical elements, 150-177. Edited by M.E.<br />

Farago. Ed. VCH, Weinheim, New York, Basel,<br />

Cambridge, Tokio.<br />

[6] VENNITT, S., PARRY, J.M., 1984:<br />

Mutagenicity testing: a practical approach. Ed.<br />

IRL Press, Oxford, Washington DC.<br />

[7] BATEMAN, A.J., 1977: Handbook of<br />

mutagenicity - Test procedures. Edited by B.J.<br />

Kilbey, M. Legator, W. Nichols, C. Ramel. Ed.<br />

Elsevier, North Holland, Amsterdam.<br />

[8] DOROFTEI, E., MIRON, L., ROTARU-<br />

STĂNCIC, M., 2008: Efectul mutagen al<br />

met<strong>ale</strong>lor grele cupru <strong>şi</strong> cadmiu la Allium cepa<br />

L. (The mutagenic effect of heavy metals<br />

cooper and cadmium at Allium cepa L.) În:<br />

Ar<strong>de</strong>lean, A., Crăciun, C. (eds), An<strong>ale</strong>le<br />

Societãţii Naţion<strong>ale</strong> <strong>de</strong> Biologie Celularã, XIII,<br />

225-229, Risoprint, Cluj-Napoca.


Elena Doroftei et al. / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 89-97 (2010)<br />

Table 2. Number of analysed cells for citogenetic studies regarding the effects of heavy metals<br />

manganese and lead on cell division<br />

Variant Total<br />

studied<br />

cell<br />

Martor<br />

Total<br />

interphase<br />

cells<br />

Total<br />

division<br />

cells<br />

Total<br />

prophase cells<br />

97<br />

Total<br />

metaphase<br />

cells<br />

Total<br />

anaphase<br />

cells<br />

Total<br />

telophase<br />

cells<br />

Nr. Nr. % Nr. % Nr. % Nr. % Nr. % Nr. %<br />

1000 850 85 150 15 51 5,1 40 4,0 30 3,0 29 2,9<br />

V1 1000 960 96 40 4,0 19 1,9 11 1,1 6 0,6 4 0,4<br />

V2 1000 968 96,8 32 3,2 14 1,4 6 0,6 4 0,4 8 0,8<br />

V3 1000 981 98,1 19 1,9 9 0,9 4 0,4 - - 6 0,6<br />

V4 1000 980 98 20 2,0 10 1,0 5 0,5 4 0,4 1 0,1<br />

V5 1000 976 97,6 24 2,4 11 1,1 6 0,6 3 0,3 4 0,4<br />

V6 1000 975 97,5 25 2,5 12 1,2 9 0,9 - - 4 0,4<br />

V7 1000 966 96,6 34 3,4 9 0,9 14 1,4 5 0,5 6 0,6<br />

V8 1000 965 96,5 35 3,5 15 1,5 9 0,9 6 0,6 5 0,5<br />

V9 1000 966 96,6 34 3,4 12 1,2 11 1,1 8 0,8 3 0,3<br />

V10 1000 974 97,4 26 2,6 11 1,1 4 0,4 3 0,3 8 0,8<br />

V11 1000 979 97,9 2,1 2,1 12 1,2 6 0,6 - - 3 0,3<br />

V12 1000 979 97,9 2,1 2,1 11 1,1 4 0,4 1 0,1 5 0,5


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

PROBLEMS OF THE HARMONIZING ENVIRONMENTAL<br />

LEGISLATION AT THE COMPARTMENT "PISCES" IN THE<br />

REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA<br />

Petru COCIRTA, Olesea GLIGA<br />

Institute of Ecology and Geography (Aca<strong>de</strong>my of Sciences of Moldova).<br />

Aca<strong>de</strong>my Str. No.1, Chișinău, MD-2028, Republica Moldova<br />

E-mail: pcocirta@hotmail.com, camiprim@inbox.ru<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: In the paper are presented some results regarding principal characteristics on the structure, qualitative<br />

and comparative analysis of the national acts with EU directives as well with EU and ISO standards. It was<br />

<strong>de</strong>monstrated the compatibility of some national legislation and normative acts with EU ones. Special attention<br />

was <strong>de</strong>dicated to the rare and endangered species of fish. It was created databases on environmental legislativenormative<br />

acts of the Republic of Moldova at the compartment “Fishes”, which shows a various and satisfactory<br />

number of acts in this domain. In the final part of the paper are presented some conclusions and proposals on the<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment of legislation and norms regarding fish species in the Republic of Moldova in accordance with EU<br />

and international requirements.<br />

Keywords: fishes and environmental legislation and normative acts state.<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

According to the Declaration of Rio <strong>de</strong> Janeiro<br />

in 1992 and Agenda 21 [1], protection of biological<br />

diversity is one of the global environmental<br />

problems, which <strong>de</strong>pends on addressing the quality of<br />

life and existence of the living organism son the<br />

earth.<br />

Development and conservation of the diversity<br />

of ichthyofauna species are of paramount importance<br />

in the management of biological diversity in the<br />

marsh and aquatic ecosystems in the Republic of<br />

Moldova [2].<br />

In the past 100 years anthropogenic pressure on<br />

aquatic and march ecosystems has changed cardinal<br />

the quantity and quality of aquatic biological<br />

diversity. In Republic of Moldova the aquatic and<br />

marsh (water areas of rivers, lakes, dam lakes, ponds)<br />

ecosystems were limited to 94,6 thousand ha (2.8%<br />

of total territory), and are unevenly distributed and<br />

characterized by a wi<strong>de</strong> variety of ecological,<br />

physical, geographical, hydrochemical,<br />

hydrobiological etc. particularities. Hydrographical<br />

network consists of three main rivers - the Danube,<br />

Dniester and Prut, as well as of 3260 rivulets and<br />

3532 lakes. Most of rives were damaged, <strong>de</strong>stroyed<br />

or channeled. Biodiversity inclu<strong>de</strong>s 160 flora and<br />

125 fauna (vertebrates) species. Hydrofauna recor<strong>de</strong>d<br />

over 2135 species, including ichthyofauna - 82<br />

species [3-5].<br />

In recent <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s the influence of anthropogenic<br />

factors (industrial pollution, eutrophication<br />

progressive, toxicity, reducing water flow, etc.) upon<br />

ecosystems river Dniester and Prut, small rivers in the<br />

territory of the country makes major changes in<br />

biodiversity of the hydro-biocenozes with loses the<br />

viability and biological significance of rivers into the<br />

biosphere and environment.<br />

As a consequence, fish resources, which are one<br />

of the important indicators statuses of the aquatic<br />

ecosystems, <strong>de</strong>creased sharply in majority natural<br />

water objects of the Republic of Moldova and a<br />

number of species (sterlet, barbel, zarte and others)<br />

are endangered. In the Red Book of the Republic of<br />

Moldova (Second edition, 2001) [6] it was inclu<strong>de</strong>d<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


Problems of the harmonizing environmental… / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 99-105 (2010)<br />

12 species of fishes (14,6 % of total number).<br />

Acording to investigations ma<strong>de</strong> by Usatai [7], it<br />

takes place the process of replacement of valuable<br />

species with less valuable.<br />

Political and socio-economic reforms in<br />

Moldova ware conditioning the need to change of<br />

attitu<strong>de</strong>s towards use of natural resources, promoting<br />

economic and social <strong>de</strong>velopment compatible with<br />

the environment. After the 2009 parliamentary<br />

elections was conditioned the need to promote the<br />

new i<strong>de</strong>as and actions for to harmonize relations in<br />

the system “Man-Society-Nature”. In this context in<br />

the Republic of Moldova there are implemented the<br />

National Strategy „Agenda 21” [8] and a number of<br />

existing national programs: The Moldovan Village,<br />

2005-2015; Program of the stabilization and<br />

economic recovery of the Republic of Moldova for<br />

the years 2009-2011 [5], and new one: Rethink<br />

Moldova. Priorities for Medium Term Development,<br />

2010-2013 [10], which would help “<strong>de</strong> facto” to<br />

economic <strong>de</strong>velopment through solving the<br />

environmental problems and respectively to stop the<br />

pollution of the environmental and <strong>de</strong>gradation their<br />

components.<br />

Current state of water areas of the Republic of<br />

Moldova induces new provocations on the<br />

elaboration of measures to <strong>de</strong>velop the actions and<br />

current species diversity of ichthyofauna, the<br />

improvement, utilization and sustainable conservation<br />

of hydrofauna in general.<br />

In the program „Rethink Moldova. Priorities<br />

Medium Term Development” among other priority<br />

issues that require to be solving there are the<br />

approximation of legislation and normative acts to<br />

those of the European Union. Achieving these<br />

<strong>de</strong>si<strong>de</strong>rates requires needs updating of the existing<br />

legislative-normative base, elaboration new laws and<br />

regulations and/or modification of those existing,<br />

adaptation national standards and normative to those<br />

international ones and/or takeover of international<br />

standards of the ISO and EN Series, etc.<br />

This <strong>de</strong>si<strong>de</strong>rates will fully covers the domain<br />

“Ichthyofauna”, including the section “Fishery”.<br />

A comprehensive study should be carried out in full<br />

for the evaluation of legal-normative basis and for<br />

highlighting some perspective problems for to legal<br />

100<br />

ensuring of the environmental management in<br />

biodiversity conservation domain.<br />

In this work are presented analytical<br />

information on current level of legislative-normative<br />

assurance of the environmental management of<br />

ichthyofauna species diversity in the Republic of<br />

Moldova and on forming of the base of legislativenormative<br />

acts in this domain.<br />

The aim of work:<br />

- analyze of legal and normativ systems on<br />

compartment "Fishes" of UN, EU and Republic of<br />

Moldova;<br />

- assessment and completing the data base of<br />

the acts referred to the Republic of Moldova;<br />

Highlighting the problems of the legislativenormative<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment in the Republic of Moldova<br />

on ichthyofauna domain;<br />

- elaboration of the proposals for harmonization<br />

of legislation and normative in the domain of<br />

ichthyofauna to the Strategy of Sustainable<br />

Development of the Republic of Moldova, to the<br />

respective EU and international acts;<br />

In this work are presented analytical and<br />

summary information on the current level of<br />

insurance protection activities of ichthyofauna in the<br />

Republic of Moldova and creation of the base of<br />

legislative-normative acts in referred domain.<br />

2. Material and Methods<br />

Study of information regarding legislativenormative<br />

acts was performed through analyse of the<br />

data banks, catalogs and other official materials of<br />

the international and national environmental<br />

organizations.<br />

Collecting of acts materials was effectuated in<br />

the frame of the official publications (written or<br />

electronic forms) of Secretariats of the international<br />

conventions, International Organization for<br />

Standardization, European Union and others, as well<br />

as from the Republic of Moldova - periodical<br />

publication "Monitorul Oficial a Republicii<br />

Moldova", Websites of the Parliament, Government,<br />

Ministry of Justice and Ministry of Environment and<br />

others.<br />

Given the fact that information accumulated in<br />

ihthiofauna domain will serve to comparative analysis<br />

of national acts to those international, especially to


Petru Cocirta, Olisea Gliga / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 99-105 (2010)<br />

European ones and will be used to <strong>de</strong>velop concrete<br />

recommendations on the harmonization of legislation,<br />

normative and standards, it was take into account the<br />

respective international methodological<br />

recommendations [11-18] and the those of national<br />

or<strong>de</strong>r - Standards of the Republic of Moldova on the<br />

principles and methodology of standardization (SM<br />

1-0:2003, MS 1-12:2002; SM 1-20:2002, SM 1-<br />

21:2002 [18, 19]) and others.<br />

Storage of the specialized information and<br />

creation of databases of legislative-normative acts on<br />

biodiversity domein (EU Directives, International<br />

Conventions, National legislation and normative) was<br />

ma<strong>de</strong> in electronic form.<br />

Collecting and processing of information on<br />

standards and technical regulations was effectuated by<br />

using existing databases of international and national<br />

Websites and formation of a register of operative<br />

information in this domain.<br />

3. Results and Discussions<br />

In the Program "Rethink Moldova. Medium<br />

Term Development Priorities, 2010-2013”<br />

approximation of legislative and normative acts to<br />

those of the EU is among the priority issues, that need<br />

resolving operational. Collection and analysis of<br />

material un<strong>de</strong>r mentioned program has permitted to<br />

highlight the following aspects of the assessment and<br />

the need of International, European and National acts<br />

for the ecological management on "Fish"<br />

compartment in the Republic of Moldova.<br />

3.1. Assessment and training normative legislative<br />

base in "PISCES"<br />

3.1.1. International legislation<br />

Various multilateral environmental agreements<br />

or conventions have been conclu<strong>de</strong>d for nature<br />

protection in general, and for aquatic fauna in special.<br />

The European Community takes an active part in the<br />

elaboration, ratification and implementation of<br />

multilateral environmental agreements. Republic of<br />

Moldova also is a part of those conventions and ma<strong>de</strong><br />

different action in accordance with ratified<br />

conventions. The principal of them which cover also<br />

the Fish compartment are named chronologically<br />

below (see Box 1).<br />

101<br />

Box 1: Multilateral environmental agreements<br />

on nature protection<br />

• Convention on Wetlands of International<br />

Importance Especially as Waterfowl<br />

Habitat (Ramsar, 1971)<br />

• Convention on International Tra<strong>de</strong> in<br />

Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and<br />

Flora (Washington,<br />

• 1973)<br />

• Convention on Conservation of Migratory<br />

Species of Wild Animals (Bonn, 1979)<br />

• Convention on the Conservation of<br />

European Wildlife and Natural Habitats<br />

(Bern, 1979)<br />

• Convention on Biological Diversity (Rio <strong>de</strong><br />

Janeiro, 1992)<br />

• Convention on Cooperation for the<br />

Protection and Sustainable Use of the<br />

Danube River (Sofia, 1994)<br />

3.1.2. EU legislation<br />

In accordance with EU recommendations [10-<br />

14], were taken to record the majority of legislative<br />

and normative acts, which are part of the acquis of<br />

Environment and need to be transposed into national<br />

law. Environmental acquis recommen<strong>de</strong>d for<br />

harmonization of national legislation is consi<strong>de</strong>rably<br />

smaller (118 documents). As the compartment “Fish”<br />

there was highlighted the following:<br />

EU Fish Protection Legislation. Within this<br />

framework, EU Nature conservation policy is<br />

implemented by one main piece of legislation –<br />

Habitats Directive - the Council Directive<br />

92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of<br />

natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. The<br />

Directive aim to provi<strong>de</strong> protection for listed species<br />

and habitats and to create the European ‘coherent<br />

European ecological network of sites – called Natura<br />

2000 to enable the maintenance or restoration of<br />

natural habitat types and the habitats of species at<br />

favorable conservation status (Art. 3, Habitats<br />

Directive). The Habitats Directive requires Special<br />

Areas of Conservation (SACs) to be <strong>de</strong>signated for<br />

listed plant and animal species, and habitats.<br />

Together, SACs and Special Protection Areas<br />

(SPAs) from Birds Directive (Council Directive<br />

79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of<br />

wild birds) make up the Natura 2000 sites. SPAs and


Problems of the harmonizing environmental… / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 99-105 (2010)<br />

SACs areas can overlap. The Natura 2000 network<br />

already comprises more than 20,000 sites, covering<br />

almost a fifth of the EU territory.<br />

Besi<strong>de</strong>s this directive there are further relevant pieces<br />

of EU nature protection legislation referred to fish,<br />

summarized in Box 2.<br />

Box 2: EU nature (fish) protection related<br />

legislation<br />

• Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the<br />

conservation of natural habitats and of wild<br />

fauna and flora<br />

• Council Directive 1999/22/EC relating to the<br />

keeping of wild animals in zoos<br />

• Council Regulation (EC) No. 338/97 on the<br />

protection of species of wild fauna and flora<br />

by regulating tra<strong>de</strong> therein<br />

Other EU legislation relevant to nature (fish)<br />

protection inclu<strong>de</strong>:<br />

• Environmental Impact Assessment Directive<br />

(85/337/EEC), amen<strong>de</strong>d by Council Directive<br />

97/11/EC,<br />

• Access to Environmental Information<br />

Directive (90/313/EEC),<br />

• Reporting Directive (91/692/EEC).<br />

3.1.3 Legislative-normative acts of the Republic of<br />

Moldova.<br />

On June 1, 2010 database of legislativenormative<br />

acts of Republic of Moldova in the<br />

ichthyofauna domain and inter<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt ones<br />

represents an impressive set of legal materials,<br />

namely:<br />

• 6 international environmental conventions to<br />

which Moldova is party;<br />

• 13 Laws of the Republic of Moldova;<br />

• 1 Presi<strong>de</strong>ntial Decree of Republic of Moldova;<br />

• 44 acts of the Republic Moldova subordinate to<br />

laws, from wich 7 Decisions of Parliament, 35<br />

Decisions of Government, 2 Acts of the Central<br />

Environmental Authority;<br />

• 1 Concept; • 2 Strategies; • 2 State Programs.<br />

The above mentioned has highlighted the<br />

importance of databases in this domain and the need<br />

to maintain and <strong>de</strong>velop them. Analyse of the results<br />

obtained show that the <strong>de</strong>velopment of legislations<br />

102<br />

and normative in the ichthyofauna domain is<br />

satisfactory.<br />

Political and social reforms from recent years<br />

have highlighted the need to harmonize legislativenormative<br />

acts, inclusive the ichthyofauna domain, to<br />

the international requirements, which will allow<br />

fulfilling the obligations of the Republic of Moldova<br />

Government, assumed by signing the international<br />

environmental conventions and facilitating the<br />

process of integration in European Union. In this<br />

context, there is evi<strong>de</strong>nt the ten<strong>de</strong>ncy and efforts for<br />

significant changes of legislative-normative acts of<br />

the Republic of Moldova, which started in last 5-6<br />

years by applying the mechanism of their<br />

harmonizing to requirements of the international<br />

legislation and normative, and, in particular, to the<br />

European requirements, in accordance with<br />

international obligations of the country.<br />

However, we should mention that several<br />

legislative-normative acts from Republic of Moldova<br />

have prescriptive nature and contain general<br />

provisions that regulate, primarily, the relations of<br />

animal kingdom protection and conservation, the<br />

management of the state protected natural areas and<br />

others. There is poorly <strong>de</strong>veloped legislative base for<br />

protection of natural complexes, for creating a green<br />

housing (frame) and application of stringent measures<br />

for recovery of environmental condition, which have<br />

directly impacts the habitats of fish species, a special<br />

vulnerable species.<br />

In national legislation lacks the mechanism<br />

nee<strong>de</strong>d to optimal ensuring of the protection and<br />

conservation activities of natural habitats of many<br />

species of fish, as well as of communities of the<br />

aquatic plant and animals.<br />

3.1.4 Legislative issues on the conservation of rare<br />

and vulnerable species<br />

Republic of Moldova legislation covers the<br />

most part of the activities of rational use and<br />

conservation of ichthyofauna species (Law on Animal<br />

kingdom (1995), Law on State Protected Areas Fund<br />

(1998), Law on fund of fisheries, fisheries and fish<br />

culture (2006), Red book of Moldova (2001).<br />

Special attention is <strong>de</strong>voted to rare and<br />

vulnerable fish species that are protected by several<br />

legislative acts, the main ones being: the Law on<br />

State Protected Areas Fund, which inclu<strong>de</strong>s 15


Petru Cocirta, Olisea Gliga / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 99-105 (2010)<br />

species, the Red Book of Moldova - 12 species. We<br />

also note the primary importance of the Berne<br />

Convention (1979) to which Moldova is part from the<br />

year 1993.<br />

Harmonize national legislation with<br />

international and European requirements impose<br />

additional measures to conserve species of<br />

ichthyofauna. Were subjected to comparative analysis<br />

some legislative acts of Republic of Moldova and<br />

those more important international (European Red<br />

List (2009) [21], Council Directive 92/43/EEC [22]<br />

and the Berne Convention [23] regarding the status<br />

and the protection state of rare and vulnerable fish<br />

species. It were analyzed the status of 21 important<br />

species of fish presents on territory of the Republic of<br />

Moldova (Table 1).<br />

Table 1. Some important fish species of the Republic<br />

of Moldova un<strong>de</strong>r comparative analysis<br />

Name of Species Acts with<br />

species found<br />

Or<strong>de</strong>r Salmoniformes<br />

1. Hucho-hucho (L) – Danube<br />

salmon or Huchen<br />

2. Salmo salar (L) -<br />

Atlantic salmon<br />

3. Umbra krameri(Walbaum) –<br />

European Mudminnow<br />

LAK, LPA, RB,<br />

ERL, CD, BC 1)<br />

ERL, CD, BC<br />

LAK, LPA, RB, BC<br />

Or<strong>de</strong>r Cipriniformes<br />

4. Rutilus frisii Nordmann – LAK, LPA, RB,<br />

Black Sea Roach<br />

ERL, CD, BC<br />

5. Leuciscus leuciscus (L) –<br />

Common Dace<br />

LAK, LPA, ERL<br />

6. Leuciscus idus (L)<br />

LAK, LPA, RB,<br />

- I<strong>de</strong> or Gol<strong>de</strong>n Orfe<br />

ERL, BC<br />

7. Vimba-vimba (L) – Zarte LPA, ERL<br />

8. Barbus barbus borysthenicus LAK, LPA, RB,<br />

(Dubowsky) – Borys<br />

ERL<br />

9. Barbus meridionalis (Petenyi LAK, LPA, RB,<br />

Heckel) – Mediterranien Barbel ERL, CD, BC<br />

10.Cobitis taenia (L) – Spined<br />

Loach<br />

CD, BC<br />

103<br />

11.Gobio albipinnatus<br />

CD, BC<br />

(Vladykov Fang) – White-finned<br />

Gudgeon<br />

12.Rho<strong>de</strong>us sericeus amarus CD, BC<br />

(Bloch) – European Bitterling<br />

Or<strong>de</strong>r Gadiformes<br />

13.Lota lota (L) - Barbot<br />

LAK, LPA, RB,<br />

ERL<br />

Or<strong>de</strong>r Perciformes<br />

14.Zingel zingel (L) – Zingel LAK, LPA, RB,<br />

ERL, CD, BC<br />

15.Zingel streber (Siebold) - LAK, LPA, RB,<br />

Sreber<br />

ERL, CD, BC<br />

Or<strong>de</strong>r Acipenseriformes<br />

16.Gimnocephalus schraetzer<br />

(L) - Schraetzer<br />

17.Huso huso (L) -<br />

European Sturgeon<br />

18.Acipenser gul<strong>de</strong>nstaedti<br />

colchilus (V.Marti) – Russian<br />

Sturgeon<br />

19.Acipenser stellatus (Pallas) -<br />

Sturry Sturgeon<br />

20.Acipenster ruthenus (L) -<br />

Sterlet<br />

21.Acipenster nudiventris<br />

(Lovetyki) – Bastard Sturgeon<br />

CD, BC<br />

LAK, LPA, RB,<br />

ERL, CD, BC<br />

LAK, LPA, RB, CD<br />

LAK, LPA, RB, CD,<br />

BC<br />

LPA, CD, BC<br />

CD<br />

Note: 1) LAK - Law on Animal Kingdom, LPA - Law on<br />

State Protected Areas Fund, RB - Red book of Moldova ,<br />

ERL - European Red List, CD - Council Drective<br />

92/43/EEC, BC - Bern Convention.<br />

Analysis <strong>de</strong>monstrates that of these above<br />

mentioned, only six species (Danube Salmon, Black<br />

Sea Roach, Mediterranean Barbel, Zingel, Streber,<br />

European Sturgeon) are covered by all legislation<br />

acts un<strong>de</strong>r review, 12 species are covered by the<br />

European Red List, 15 species - Council Directive<br />

92/43/EEC and 15 species - Bern Convention,<br />

respectively.<br />

There were i<strong>de</strong>ntified 9 species, which in<br />

accordance with requirements of Council Drective<br />

92/43/EEC falling un<strong>de</strong>r Annex II and requires the<br />

<strong>de</strong>signation of special areas of conservation, as wel as<br />

un<strong>de</strong>r the Bern Convention, ratified by the Moldovan<br />

Parliament <strong>de</strong>cision No. 1546-XII of 23. 06. 93. But<br />

5 of these species (Salmo salar, Cobitis taenia,<br />

Gobio albipinnatus, Rho<strong>de</strong>us sericeus amarus,


Problems of the harmonizing environmental… / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 99-105 (2010)<br />

Gimnocephalus schraetser) have no-one protected<br />

status in the Republic of Moldova. Also were<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntified 2 species (Acipenster rutenus and<br />

Acipenster nudiventri) falling un<strong>de</strong>r Annex V of the<br />

Council Directive 92/43/EEC, but the second species<br />

has no one of any protected status in country.<br />

The comparative analysis <strong>de</strong>monstrates the<br />

need to review the rarity status of the mentioned fish<br />

species and/or their inclusion in the Red Book of<br />

Moldova, in other legislation acts and/or performing<br />

other actions to perpetuate their best. These findings<br />

are in full compliance with existing legal basis of the<br />

Republic of Moldova: Art. 9, 16, 17 and 18 of the<br />

Law on the Red Book of Moldova (No. 325-XVI<br />

from 15. 12. 2005); The Common Action Plan<br />

Republic of Moldova – European Union, 2005-2007;<br />

and The Program "Rethink of Moldova. Priorities for<br />

medium term <strong>de</strong>velopment".<br />

Comparative analysis of the state and how to<br />

protect rare and vulnerable species of fish confirmed<br />

the importance of measures taken and existing needs<br />

in Moldova in this section. Increasing vulnerability a<br />

ichthyofauna species confirmed by increasing number<br />

of introduced species in the Red Book of Moldova,<br />

the second edition of. Proposals have already been<br />

<strong>de</strong>veloped [7] introducing other four species in the<br />

next edition (III) of the Red Book. They are supposed<br />

to be: Tench - Tinca tinca (L), Spirlin - Alburnoi<strong>de</strong>s<br />

bipunctatus rossicus (Berg), Crucian Carp -<br />

Carassius Carassius (L.), Wels catfish - Silurus<br />

glanis (L.).<br />

3.2. Evaluation and formation standards database<br />

in „PISCES”<br />

In the compartment "Pisces", relative to other<br />

domains there are few sets of standards, gained<br />

worldwi<strong>de</strong> by international organizations - ISO<br />

(International Standardisation Organisation) and IEC<br />

(International Electrotechnical Commission) and at<br />

the European level - CEN (European Committee for<br />

Standardization), CENELEC (European<br />

Electrotechnical Committee for Standardization) and<br />

ETSI (European Telecommunications Standards<br />

Institute) [17.18].<br />

3.2.1. International standards<br />

In accordance with electronic information<br />

provi<strong>de</strong>d by the Organization ISO [17], in querying<br />

104<br />

for section "Fish" can be found 17 ISO standards and<br />

one in elaboration and for section "Fishing and fish<br />

breeding" another 13 ISO standards. Meanwhile at<br />

the European level [18] for the section "Fish" it was<br />

highlighted 12 EN standards, from which 8 ISO<br />

standards taken by EN (European Normatives)<br />

organization.<br />

3.2.2. Standards of the Republic of Moldova<br />

The Republic of Moldova doesn’t have in action<br />

ISO and EN standards. But in Catalogue of normative<br />

documents in standardization of the Republic of<br />

Moldova [19.20] in 65.150 section “Fishing and fish<br />

farming” were not i<strong>de</strong>ntified standards in use, and in<br />

section 67.120.30 “Fish and fish products” are in<br />

force 109 GOST standards (standards of Russia<br />

adopted as national). It is clear the need of some<br />

<strong>de</strong>cisions and activities in <strong>de</strong>veloping regulations and<br />

standards in the relevant field.<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

Republic of Moldova dispose a significant base<br />

of legislative-normative acts in ichthyofauna domain.<br />

The legal regulation of ichthyofauna conservation is<br />

in continuous <strong>de</strong>velopment, already having a solid<br />

theoretical and practical basis.<br />

In the last 4-5 years it is obvious trend and<br />

efforts for significant changing of the legislativenormative<br />

acts of the Republic of Moldova by<br />

applying of the mechanism to their harmonizing to<br />

the requirements of international legislation and<br />

normative, especially, to the European requirements.<br />

In connection with the increasing vulnerability<br />

of species further efforts are nee<strong>de</strong>d for continuous<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment of legislative basis regarding the<br />

habitats protection of vulnerable species of fish and<br />

protection of natural complexes in general, as well as<br />

creation a ecological housing and application of<br />

stringent measures to redress the environmental<br />

status.<br />

Comparative analysis of the state and protection<br />

mo<strong>de</strong> of rare and vulnerable fish species has<br />

confirmed the importance of measures taken and<br />

existing needs in the Republic of Moldova in this<br />

domain.<br />

Additional measures are nee<strong>de</strong>d on improving<br />

the mechanism and instruments to ensure optimal


Petru Cocirta, Olisea Gliga / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 99-105 (2010)<br />

operation of the protection and conservation of many<br />

species of fish natural habitats, as well as of plant and<br />

animal aquatic communities.<br />

In Republic of Moldova the ichthyofauna<br />

domain needs to move quickly to adopt international<br />

and European standards in national practice.<br />

Given that the diversity of fish species in<br />

Moldova is in its own way, unique and, un<strong>de</strong>r current<br />

conditions of climate change, utilization and damage<br />

of the ichthyofauna species genetic fund, there is<br />

need more attention, a stricter approach and effective<br />

activities for resolution of their <strong>de</strong>velopment and<br />

conservation problems.<br />

5. References<br />

[1] Agenda 21, Rio <strong>de</strong> Janeiro, 1992.<br />

[2] Republic of Moldova. Biological Diversity<br />

Conservation National Strategy and Action Plan.<br />

(Ministry of the Environment and Territorial<br />

Development. The World Bank), Chi<strong>şi</strong>nău,<br />

Ştiinţa, 2002, 100 p.<br />

[3] Republic of Moldova, First National Report on<br />

Biological Diversity. (Ministry of the<br />

Environment and Territorial Development. The<br />

World Bank), Chi<strong>şi</strong>nău, Ştiinţa, 2000, 68 p.<br />

[4] Republic of Moldova. Third National Report on<br />

the implementation of the Convention on<br />

Biological Diversity. CBD, Chisinau, December,<br />

2005.<br />

[5]http://bsapm.moldnet.md/Text/Raportul%20III/Ra<br />

pr-03-englez.pdf - data of access 4 June 2010<br />

Republic of Moldova. State of the environment<br />

Report 2006. Ministry of Ecology and Natural<br />

Resources, Chi<strong>şi</strong>nău, 2007, 85 p.<br />

[6] Red Book of the Republic of Moldova, Second<br />

edition, Stiinta, 2001, 288p.<br />

[7] USATÂI M. “Evolution, conservation, and<br />

sustainable use of diversity of ichthyofauna in<br />

aquatic ecosystems of Republic of Moldova”.<br />

Autoreferat of dissertation for the scientific<br />

<strong>de</strong>gree of doctor Habilitatus in biological<br />

sciences. Chi<strong>şi</strong>nău, 2004, 48 p. (In Romanian)<br />

[8] National Strategy of the Sustainable Development<br />

– “Moldova 21”. Supreme Economic Council<br />

un<strong>de</strong>r Presi<strong>de</strong>nt of the Republic of Moldova,<br />

PNUD Moldova, Chi<strong>şi</strong>nău, 2000, 129 pag. (In<br />

Romanian).<br />

105<br />

[9] National program “Moldovian Village, 2005-<br />

2015; Program for stabilization and re-launch of<br />

the economy in the Republic of Moldova for years<br />

2009-2011 (In Romanian) - www.gov.md.<br />

[10] Government of Moldova. Rethink Moldova.<br />

Priorities for Medium Term Development. Report<br />

for the Consultative Group Meeting in Brussels<br />

24 March 2010<br />

http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTMOLDOV<br />

A/Resources/Rethink-Moldova-2010-2013-Fin<strong>ale</strong>dit-110310.pdf<br />

[11] White Paper on the Preparation of the<br />

Associated Countries of Central and Eastern<br />

Europe for Integration into the Internal Market of<br />

the Union, COM(95) 163 final, 3.5.1995<br />

[12] Environmental regulatory reform in the NIS: the<br />

case of the Water sector. Twelfth meeting of the<br />

EAP Task Force, 18-19 October 2000, Almaty.<br />

http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/23/5/2382097.pdf<br />

[13] Gui<strong>de</strong> to the approximation of the European<br />

Union Environmental Legislation, SEC (97) 1608<br />

of 25.08.1997.<br />

http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gui<strong>de</strong>/contents.ht<br />

m<br />

[14] Handbook on the implementation of ec<br />

environmental legislation.<br />

http://ec.europa.eu/environment/enlarg/handbook/<br />

handbook.htm<br />

[15] COCIRTA P., CLIPA Carolina. Ecological<br />

legislation of the Republic of Moldova: Catalogue<br />

of the documents. Chisinau, Stiinta, 2008, 65 pag.<br />

(In Romanian)<br />

[16] COCIRTA P. Environmental systems and<br />

electronic information’s in the Republic of<br />

Moldova. Aca<strong>de</strong>my of Sciences of Moldova.<br />

Institute of Ecology and Geography – Chisinau,<br />

2007. 30 pag. (In Romanian)<br />

[17]http://www.standardsinfo.net/info/livelink/fetch/2<br />

000/148478/6301438/in<strong>de</strong>x.html<br />

18. http://www.cen.eu/cen/pages/<strong>de</strong>fault.aspx<br />

[19] Catalogue of normative documents in<br />

standardization of the Republic of Moldova. Year<br />

2008. National Institute of Standardization and<br />

Metrology. Vol.1,2,3. Chisinau, 2008. (In<br />

Romanian)<br />

[20] http://www.standard.md;<br />

[21] European Red List. - www.iucnredlist/Europe<br />

[22]http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/legislatio<br />

n/habitatsdirective/in<strong>de</strong>x_en.htm


Problems of the harmonizing environmental… / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 99-105 (2010)<br />

[23]http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/environm<br />

ent/nature_and_biodiversity/l28046_en.htm<br />

106


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN CONSTANŢA COUNTY<br />

Silvia TURCU*, Marcela POPOVICI**, Loreley JIANU**<br />

*Ovidius University of Constanţa, Doctoral School, Biology Domain,<br />

Mamaia Avenue, No. 124, Constanţa, 900552, Romania, sscturcu@yahoo.com<br />

** Environmental Protection Agency Constanţa, Unirii Street, No. 23, Constanţa, 900532<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: Nature conservation is the action taken by human society to maintain and perpetuation of species of<br />

plants and animals. Recognition of the value of biodiversity in Constanta County is done by the special<br />

protection of habitats and species for an important number of protected areas. The main instrument governing the<br />

activities taking place at the perimeter and adjacent of natural areas is management plan of protected area, in<br />

accordance with existing environmental legislation.<br />

Keywords: biodiversity conservation, protected areas, administration and custody, Constanţa County.<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Nature Conservation is the action taken by<br />

human society to maintain and perpetuation of<br />

species of plants and animals [1]. In our country, to<br />

provi<strong>de</strong> special measures of protection and<br />

biodiversity conservation, was instituted a tiered<br />

system of protection, conservation and use,<br />

according to the following categories of protected<br />

areas: national interest (scientific reserves, national<br />

parks, natural monuments, nature reserves, natural<br />

parks), the international interest (natural sites of<br />

universal natural heritage, geoparks, wetlands of<br />

international importance, biosphere reserves), the<br />

community interest or Natura 2000 sites (sites of<br />

Community Importance, Special Areas of<br />

Conservation Areas Special Protection Bird) or<br />

local interest [2].<br />

2. Results and Discussions<br />

In Constanţa County, there are over 900<br />

species spermatophytes present, most of these are<br />

characteristic species of steppe and forest steppe<br />

habitats, over 200 species of vascular flora of<br />

national interest, with varying <strong>de</strong>grees of<br />

vulnerability, some of these are en<strong>de</strong>mic species<br />

[3].<br />

Fauna of Constanţa County is characterized<br />

by great wealth, represented by more than 345<br />

vertebrate taxa - 45 species of mammals, 243 birds,<br />

19 species of reptiles, 10 species of amphibians and<br />

28 species of fish - and a significant number of<br />

invertebrates [3].<br />

In Constanţa County, natural and semi-natural<br />

habitats, found in all environments (aquatic,<br />

terrestrial and subterranean), are classified into<br />

seven classes (coastal and halophilic communities,<br />

continental water, scrub and grassland, forests,<br />

marshes and wetlands, screes, rock and continental<br />

sands and agricultural land and artificial<br />

landscapes) which inclu<strong>de</strong> 58 types of natural<br />

habitat and ru<strong>de</strong>ral communities (agricultural land<br />

and artificial landscapes) [4].<br />

Thus, since 1970, a number of valuable areas<br />

in terms of biodiversity were <strong>de</strong>clared reserves by<br />

<strong>de</strong>cisions of Constanţa County People’s Council.<br />

In 2000, only two of the previously <strong>de</strong>clared<br />

protected natural areas remains areas of local<br />

interest (Table 1), for the rest of these, by Law<br />

5/2000 [5] is nationally recognized protected area<br />

status.<br />

In coming years, new laws were imposed on<br />

other areas of protected area status of national<br />

interest: Government Decision 2151/2004 [6],<br />

Government Decision 1581/2005 [7], Government<br />

Decision 1143/2007 [8] and currently totaling 36<br />

protected natural areas of national interest (Table<br />

2).<br />

Since joining the European Union in 2007,<br />

Romania has emerged as one of the nations that<br />

have a true natural heritage, with many protected<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


Biodiversity Conservation in Constanta County/ Ovidius University Annals - Biology-Ecology Series 14: 107-113 (2010)<br />

areas and many species listed in Annexes of Birds<br />

and Habitats Directives. Un<strong>de</strong>r European<br />

Directives, European Council Directive 92/43 EEC<br />

[9], and Birds Directive - European Council<br />

Directive 79/409 EEC [10], countries of European<br />

Union (EU) ensures maintenance or restoration of<br />

natural habitats and wild fauna and flora of<br />

Community interest in a favorable conservation<br />

status, to help maintain biodiversity.<br />

Following the transposition of these two<br />

Directives into national law was established system<br />

of protection for 42 areas: 22 special protection<br />

areas for birds (SPA), reported by Government<br />

Decision no. 1284/2007 [11] and a number of 20<br />

sites of community importance (SCI), <strong>de</strong>clared by<br />

Or<strong>de</strong>r no. 1964/2007 [12] (Table 3 and Table 4).<br />

There is a part of the “Danube Delta” Biosphere<br />

Reserve, internationally protected area, on<br />

administrative territory of Constanţa County. This<br />

is the largest protected area in the country and has a<br />

threefold international status: Biosphere Reserve,<br />

Ramsar Site and Site of World Natural and Cultural<br />

Heritage (Table 4). “Danube Delta” Biosphere<br />

Reserve has its own administrative structure<br />

established by Law 82/1993 [13]. Management plan<br />

af this protected area was <strong>de</strong>veloped by Danube<br />

Delta “Biosphere Reserve” Administration.<br />

Techirghiol Lake became the Ramsar Site on<br />

March 23, 2006 and was classified as wetland of<br />

international importance by Government Decision<br />

no. 1586/2006 [14] (Table 4). In addition to this<br />

status, Techirghiol Lake was <strong>de</strong>clared nature<br />

reserve and Bird Protection (Natura 2000). This<br />

protected area has not been attributed in custody,<br />

but “Dobrogea-Litoral” Water Directorate, in<br />

partnership with The Romanian Ornithological<br />

Society have <strong>de</strong>veloped a management plan for<br />

Lake Techirghiol trough project<br />

LIFE04NAT/RO/000220 Improving wintering<br />

condition for Branta ruficollis at Techirghiol Lake.<br />

As can be seen from Tables 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5<br />

responsibilities for managing natural protected<br />

areas, placed un<strong>de</strong>r special protection and<br />

conservation, belong to local authorities for<br />

protected natural areas <strong>de</strong>clared by <strong>de</strong>cisions of<br />

their, to “Danube Delta” Biosphere Reserve<br />

Administration for Biosphere Reserve Danube<br />

Delta and to custodians/ administrators for natural<br />

protected areas <strong>de</strong>clared by law, by Government<br />

108<br />

<strong>de</strong>cisions or by or<strong>de</strong>r of the central public authority<br />

for environmental protection. Gaining of<br />

custody/administration of natural protected areas is<br />

in accordance with the procedure of Government<br />

Decision 1533/2007 [15]. However, within six<br />

months of the signing of custody agreement for<br />

natural protected areas, custodian must <strong>de</strong>velope<br />

regulation of protected area, which contains the<br />

rules will be respected within the protected area,<br />

and within a year to effectuate the protected area<br />

management plan, in line with regulation. The<br />

measures provi<strong>de</strong>d in management plans of<br />

protected natural areas are <strong>de</strong>veloped taking<br />

account of economic requirements, social and<br />

cultural as well as on regional and local area, but<br />

with priority for the objectives which led to the<br />

establishment of protected area.<br />

3. Conclusions<br />

Recognition of the value of biodiversity in<br />

Constanta county is done by the special care and<br />

protection of habitats and species for a number of<br />

two protected areas of county interest, 36 protected<br />

natural areas of national interest, 42 protected<br />

natural areas of interest (Natura 2000 sites): 22 of<br />

Special Protection Areas for Birds (SPAs) and 20<br />

Sites of Community Importance (SCI), two natural<br />

areas of international concern.<br />

Currently, of the 82 protected areas in the<br />

county of Constanţa 68 are administered according<br />

to law, and 14 will be assumed to custody until the<br />

end of 2010.<br />

Conservation of biodiversity is in accordance<br />

with existing environmental legislation and<br />

management plan of protected areas is the main<br />

instrument governing the activities taking place at<br />

the perimeter and adjacent natural areas.<br />

Management of protected natural areas in<br />

Constanţa County will improve by <strong>de</strong>veloping the<br />

management plans, by custodians/ administrators.<br />

4. References<br />

[1] BAVARU A. et al., 2007- Biodiversitatea <strong>şi</strong><br />

ocrotirea naturii, Editura Aca<strong>de</strong>miei Române.<br />

[2] ***Government Emergency Ordinance no.<br />

57/2007 on the regime of natural protected areas,<br />

natural habitats, flora and fauna.


Silvia Turcu et al./ Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 107-113 (2010)<br />

[3] ***Report on the Environmental Conditions in<br />

Constanţa County in 2009.<br />

[4] DONIŢĂ N. et al. 2005, "Habitatele din<br />

Romania", Editura Tehnică <strong>şi</strong> Silvică.<br />

[5] ***Law 5/2000 approving the national spatial<br />

plan and is nationally recognized and protected<br />

area status.<br />

[6] ***Government Decision 2151/2004 on the<br />

establishment of protected area regime to new<br />

areas,<br />

[7] Government Decision 1581/2005 concerning<br />

the establishment of protected area system to new<br />

areas.<br />

[8] ***Government Decision 1143/2007<br />

concerning the establishment of new protected<br />

areas.<br />

[9] ***European Council Directive 92/43 EEC on<br />

the conservation of natural habitats and wild flora<br />

and fauna adopted on May 21, 1992.<br />

[10] ***European Council Directive 79/409 EEC<br />

on the conservation of wild birds taken on April<br />

2, 1979.<br />

109<br />

[11] ***Government Decision no. 1284/2007<br />

<strong>de</strong>claring Bird specially protected areas as part of<br />

the European ecological network Natura 2000 in<br />

Romania.<br />

[12] ***Or<strong>de</strong>r of Ministry of Environment and<br />

Sustainable Development no. 1964/2007<br />

concerning the establishment of protected area<br />

system of sites of Community importance, as part<br />

of European ecological network Natura 2000 in<br />

Romania.<br />

[13] ***LAW no 82/1993 establishing Biosphere<br />

Reserve “Danube Delta”.<br />

[14] ***Government Decision no. 1586/2006 on<br />

the classification of protected areas in the<br />

category of wetlands of international importance.<br />

[15] ***Or<strong>de</strong>r no. 1533/2008 approving the<br />

Methodology for the award of administration of<br />

natural protected areas that require the<br />

establishment of administrative structures and<br />

methodology for awarding custody of protected<br />

natural areas that do not require the creation of<br />

management structures.


Biodiversity Conservation in Constanta County/ Ovidius University Annals - Biology-Ecology Series 14: 107-113 (2010)<br />

Table 1. Natural Protected Areas of county interest<br />

No. Protected area Administrator<br />

1. “Arborele Corylus colurna” - natural monument Constanţa Hall<br />

2. “Pâlcul <strong>de</strong> stejari brumării” - natural monument Mangalia Hall<br />

Table 2. Natural Protected Areas of national interest<br />

No. Protected area Administrator/ Custodian<br />

1.<br />

“Acvatoriul litoral-marin Vama Veche-2 Mai”<br />

- Zoological and Botanical Reserve<br />

-<br />

2.<br />

“Canar<strong>ale</strong>le din Portul Hârşova” -<br />

Morfogeological Monument<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

3.<br />

“Cetatea Histria” Scientific Reserve -<br />

Archaeological Site part of Danube Delta<br />

“Biosphere Reserve”<br />

Danube Delta “Biosphere Reserve”<br />

Administration -Tulcea<br />

4.<br />

“Dealul Alah Bair” - Complex Nature<br />

Reserve<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

5.<br />

“Dunele marine <strong>de</strong> la Agigea” - Botanical<br />

Nature Reserve<br />

A.I. Cuza University - Ia<strong>şi</strong><br />

6.<br />

“Grindul Chituc” - Scientific Reserve part of<br />

Danube Delta “Biosphere Reserve”<br />

Danube Delta “Biosphere Reserve”<br />

Administration - Tulcea<br />

7.<br />

“Grindul Lupilor” - Scientific Reserve part of<br />

Danube Delta “Biosphere Reserve”<br />

Danube Delta “Biosphere Reserve”<br />

Administration - Tulcea<br />

8. “Gura Dobrogei” - Complex Nature Reserve<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

9. “Lacul Agigea” - Zoological Nature Reserve -<br />

10. “Lacul Bugeac” - Complex Nature Reserve<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

11. “Lacul Dunăreni” - Complex Nature Reserve<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

12. “Lacul Oltina” - Complex Nature Reserve<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

“Lacul Techirghiol” - Zoological Nature<br />

13.<br />

Reserve<br />

-<br />

14. “Lacul Ve<strong>de</strong>roasa” - Complex Nature Reserve<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

“Locul fosilifer Aliman” - P<strong>ale</strong>ontological<br />

15.<br />

Monument<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

“Locul fosilifer Cernavodă”- Geological and<br />

16.<br />

P<strong>ale</strong>ontological Monument<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

“Locul fosilifer Credinţa” - P<strong>ale</strong>ontological<br />

17.<br />

Monument<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

“Locul fosilifer Movila Banului”- Geological<br />

18.<br />

and P<strong>ale</strong>ontological Monument<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

110


Silvia Turcu et al./ Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 107-113 (2010)<br />

“Recifii jurasici Cheia” - Geological and<br />

19.<br />

Botanical Nature Reserve<br />

“Mlaştina Hergheliei” - Complex Nature<br />

20.<br />

Reserve<br />

“Obanul Mare <strong>şi</strong> Peştera ” -<br />

21. Speleological and Morfogeological Nature<br />

Reserve<br />

22. “Pădurea Bratca” - Complex Nature Reserve<br />

“Pădurea Canaraua-Fetii”- Botanical and<br />

23.<br />

Zoological Nature Reserve<br />

“Pădurea Celea Mare - V<strong>ale</strong>a lui Ene” -<br />

24.<br />

Complex Nature Reserve<br />

25. “Pădurea Cetate” - Complex Nature Reserve<br />

“Pădurea Dumbrăveni” - Botanical and<br />

26.<br />

Zoological Nature Reserve<br />

“Pădurea Esechioi” - Botanical and Zoological<br />

27.<br />

Nature Reserve<br />

“Pădurea Fântâniţa-Murfatlar” - Botanical and<br />

28.<br />

Zoological Nature Reserve<br />

“Pădurea Hagieni” - Botanical and Zoological<br />

29.<br />

Nature Reserve<br />

30.<br />

“Pereţii calcaro<strong>şi</strong> <strong>de</strong> la Petroşani” - Geological<br />

Monument<br />

“Peştera ” - Speleological<br />

31.<br />

Monument<br />

“Peştera ” - Scientific<br />

32.<br />

Speleological Reserve<br />

“Peştera ” - Speleological<br />

33.<br />

Monument<br />

“Reciful neojurasic <strong>de</strong> la Topalu” - Geological<br />

34.<br />

and P<strong>ale</strong>ontological Monument<br />

“Corbu-Nunta<strong>şi</strong>-Histria” – Scientific Reserve<br />

35.<br />

part of Danube Delta “Biosphere Reserve”<br />

“Valu lui Traian Rezervaţie” - Archaeological<br />

36.<br />

and Botanical Nature Reserve<br />

Table 3. Special Protection Areas – for Birds (SPA)<br />

111<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

The Group of Un<strong>de</strong>rwater and Speleological<br />

Exploration - Bucharest<br />

The Group of Un<strong>de</strong>rwater and Speleological<br />

Exploration - Bucharest<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

The Group of Un<strong>de</strong>rwater and Speleological<br />

Exploration - Bucharest<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

Danube Delta “Biosphere Reserve”<br />

Administration -Tulcea<br />

No. Site Name Administrator/ Custodian<br />

1. “Aliman – Adamclisi”<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

2. “Allah Bair – Capidava”<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

-


Biodiversity Conservation in Constanta County/ Ovidius University Annals - Biology-Ecology Series 14: 107-113 (2010)<br />

3.<br />

“Balta Mică a Brăilei”<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Brăila<br />

4.<br />

“Balta Ve<strong>de</strong>roasa”<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

5.<br />

“Băneasa - Canaraua Fetei”<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

6.<br />

“Canar<strong>ale</strong>le <strong>de</strong> la Hârşova”<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

7.<br />

“Cheile Dobrogei”<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

8. “Delta Dunării <strong>şi</strong> Complexul Razim – Danube Delta “Biosphere Reserve”<br />

Sinoie”<br />

Administration -Tulcea<br />

9.<br />

“Dumbrăveni”<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

10.<br />

“Dunăre – Ostroave”<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

11. “Dunărea Veche - Braţul Măcin” -<br />

12.<br />

“Lacul Bugeac”<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

13.<br />

“Lacul Dunăreni”<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

14.<br />

“Lacul Oltina”<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

15. “Lacul Siutghiol” -<br />

16. “Lacurile Taşaul – Corbu” -<br />

17. “Lacul Techirghiol” -<br />

18.<br />

“Limanu – Herghelia”<br />

The Group of Un<strong>de</strong>rwater and Speleological<br />

Exploration - Bucharest<br />

19. “Marea Neagră” EUROLEVEL<br />

20.<br />

“Pădurea Hagieni”<br />

National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

21. “Stepa Casimcea” -<br />

22. “Stepa Saraiu – Horea” -<br />

Table 4. Sites of Community Importance (SCI)<br />

No. Site Name Administrator/ Custodian<br />

1. “Balta Mică a Brăilei” National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Brăila<br />

2. “Braţul Măcin” -<br />

3. “Canar<strong>ale</strong>le Dunării” National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

4. “Dealul Alah Bair” National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

5. “Delta Dunării” Danube Delta “Biosphere Reserve”<br />

Administration<br />

6. “Delta Dunării - zona marină” Danube Delta “Biosphere Reserve”<br />

Administration<br />

112


Silvia Turcu et al./ Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 107-113 (2010)<br />

7. “Dumbrăveni - V<strong>ale</strong>a Urluia - Lacul National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Ve<strong>de</strong>roasa”<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

8. “Dunele marine <strong>de</strong> la Agigea” A.I. Cuza University Iasi<br />

9. “Fântâniţa Murfatlar” National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

10. “Izvoarele sulfuroase submarine <strong>de</strong> la<br />

Mangalia”<br />

GEOECOMAR<br />

11. “Mlaştina Hergheliei - Obanul Mare <strong>şi</strong> The Group of Un<strong>de</strong>rwater and Speleological<br />

Peştera Movilei”<br />

Exploration - Bucharest<br />

12. “Pădurea Esechioi - Lacul Bugeac” National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

13. “Pădurea Hagieni - Cotul Văii” National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

14. “Pădurea <strong>şi</strong> V<strong>ale</strong>a Canaraua Fetii – National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Iortmac”<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

15. “Peştera Limanu” The Group of Un<strong>de</strong>rwater and Speleological<br />

Exploration - Bucharest<br />

16. “Plaja submersă Eforie Nord - Eforie Sud” EUROLEVEL<br />

17. “Podişul Nord Dobrogean” -<br />

18. “Recifii Jurasici Cheia” National Forest Administration ROMSILVA-<br />

Forestry Department Constanţa<br />

19. “Vama Veche - 2 Mai” -<br />

20. “Zona marină <strong>de</strong> la Capul Tuzla”<br />

GEOECOMAR<br />

Table 5. Natural Protected Areas of international concern<br />

No. Protected Area Administrator<br />

1. “Lacul Techirghiol” - Ramsar Site -<br />

2.<br />

“Delta Dunării” – Biosphere Reserve, Ramsar Site,<br />

World Heritage Site Natural and Cultural<br />

Danube Delta “Biosphere<br />

Reserve” Administration -Tulcea<br />

113


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

THE PRESENT SITUATION OF THE NOSE HORNED VIPER POPULATIONS<br />

(VIPERA AMMODYTES MONTANDONI BOULENGER 1904)<br />

FROM DOBRUDJA (ROMANIA AND BULGARIA)<br />

Marian TUDOR<br />

Universitatea Ovidius Constanţa, <strong>Facultatea</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>Ştiinţe</strong> <strong>ale</strong> <strong>Naturii</strong> <strong>şi</strong> <strong>Ştiinţe</strong> <strong>Agricole</strong><br />

B-dul Mamaia, nr. 124, Constanţa, 900527, România, e-mail<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: Due to the <strong>de</strong>struction and <strong>de</strong>terioration of the specific habitats and the increased fragmentation of the<br />

remaining ones, the nose horned viper has lost large tracts of vital living space. In addition, road kills, direct kills<br />

and collecting by humans contribute to their <strong>de</strong>cline. I tried to estimate the present situation of the nose horned<br />

viper populations in Dobrudja, based on literature and our own field data. The main goals were: to investigate the<br />

present situation of the nose horned populations in Dobrudja; to i<strong>de</strong>ntify the most suitable habitats for Vipera<br />

ammodytes montandoni; and to locate the viable populations of this viper and current threats to the nose horned<br />

viper populations.<br />

Keywords: Dobrudja, Nose-Horned Viper, viable populations<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The study of the nose horned viper in general,<br />

and of the Dobrudja subspecies in particular, can<br />

offer both herpetologists and conservationist<br />

biologists important data due to the relatively strict<br />

habitat requirements of this herpeto-taxon (particular<br />

habitat conditions, the necessary presence of certain<br />

prey-species in the habitat etc), as well as to its<br />

vulnerability to the modifications of the specific<br />

habitats. From this point of view, it is one of the i<strong>de</strong>al<br />

species for monitoring in the protected areas, as well<br />

as in those territories to be <strong>de</strong>signated protected areas<br />

in the future. The subspecies is consi<strong>de</strong>red critically<br />

endangered (CR) in the Vertebrates Red List of<br />

Romania [1] and it is inclu<strong>de</strong>d in annex 3A of OM<br />

1198/2005 (Species of European interest in need of<br />

strict protection, critically endangered species).<br />

The populations of Vipera ammodytes<br />

montandoni are in a continuous <strong>de</strong>cline [2] due to<br />

anthropogenic causes and their need for preservation<br />

is all the more imperative as the <strong>de</strong>struction of the<br />

specific habitats has increased consi<strong>de</strong>rably over the<br />

last few years.<br />

2. Material and Methods<br />

Starting with 1995, thirty-eight locations<br />

mentioned in literature ([3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9])<br />

in the Romanian area of Dobrudja have been<br />

explored with the purpose of verifying the<br />

preservation state of the nose horned viper<br />

populations. Eight more locations have been explored<br />

for the same reason in the Bulgarian region of<br />

Dobrudja in 2008.<br />

The researches took place especially in spring<br />

and autumn, when the vipers are more active and<br />

more easily recognizable in the specific habitats [10],<br />

[11], [12], [13], [14]. The explorations used visual<br />

transects as well as the method of active search in the<br />

specific habitats. [11], [15].<br />

The capture and handling of the vipers was<br />

accomplished with the help of the herpetological<br />

hook and tongs ([16], [17]). Leather gloves were used<br />

in the case of small individuals. After i<strong>de</strong>ntification<br />

and sex <strong>de</strong>termination, each individual was released<br />

in the same place where it was captured from. Also,<br />

the roads that bor<strong>de</strong>red or intersected the explored<br />

habitats were repeatedly examined, and all the road<br />

kills were photographed and collected. The searches<br />

led many times to the discovery of individuals whose<br />

<strong>de</strong>ath was a result of the direct interaction with<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


The present situation of the nose horned viper.../ Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 115-120 (2010)<br />

humans. In such cases, the vipers had usually been hit<br />

to <strong>de</strong>ath with stones or other<br />

hard objects. No instances of natural <strong>de</strong>ath were<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntified among the <strong>de</strong>ad individuals.<br />

All the inventoried individuals in each<br />

researched habitat were quantified and the<br />

<strong>de</strong>termination of the viability <strong>de</strong>gree of the<br />

populations was attempted by means of calculating<br />

the i<strong>de</strong>ntified adult/juveniles proportion [18]. The<br />

calculation of the viability <strong>de</strong>gree also took into<br />

account the state of the habitats and particularly the<br />

level of human intervention, starting from the premise<br />

that a natural or semi-natural habitat offers much<br />

better conditions for the survival of a nose horned<br />

viper population than an anthropogenic one.<br />

3. Results and Discussions<br />

The study has ren<strong>de</strong>red evi<strong>de</strong>nt certain aspects<br />

that complete the data regarding the state of the nose<br />

horned viper populations in Dobrudja. Thus, if before<br />

our researches, it was consi<strong>de</strong>red that Vipera<br />

ammodytes montandoni has a relatively large<br />

distribution in Dobrudja [7], [19], [9], our data rather<br />

bring arguments in favor of the i<strong>de</strong>a that this<br />

subspecies currently occupies small habitats in more<br />

or less strictly <strong>de</strong>lineated areas. This aspect supports<br />

the i<strong>de</strong>a that the exchanges of individuals among<br />

populations are very poor or lack completely. This<br />

may lead in time to the reduction of the intrapopulation<br />

genetic diversity.<br />

Also, most of the habitats of nose horned viper<br />

populations in Dobrudja are intersected or bor<strong>de</strong>red<br />

by roads. Thus, it was observed that, out of a total of<br />

thirty-eight locations situated in the Romanian part of<br />

Dobrudja where populations of nose horned viper had<br />

previously been mentioned [7], only in twenty-five of<br />

them (65.8%) the presence of this herpeto-taxon<br />

could be ren<strong>de</strong>red evi<strong>de</strong>nt. Numerous monasteries<br />

and hermitages have been built over the past ten years<br />

and their presence already generates a rise in the<br />

number of direct kills in some locations where there<br />

were populations of nose horned viper such as<br />

Babadag Forest, Gura Dobrogei, Dumbraveni,<br />

Hagieni and the foot of Pricopanului Peak.<br />

The existence of this Dobrudja subspecies could<br />

no longer be evi<strong>de</strong>nced in the other thirteen locations<br />

116<br />

previously mentioned as habitats for nose horned<br />

viper populations.<br />

The study has evi<strong>de</strong>nced the fact that in<br />

Dobrudja (both the Romanian and the Bulgarian<br />

si<strong>de</strong>), the largest populations of Vipera ammodytes<br />

montandoni are situated in Dumbraveni Natural<br />

Reserve, Babadag Forest, Priopcea Hill, Macin<br />

Mountains National Park, Gura Dobrogei Natural<br />

Reserve, the ruins of Adamclisi fortress, Canaraua<br />

Fetii Natural Reserve, Rusalka, Kaliakra, Bolata<br />

Dèrè, Yaillata and Kamen Bryag. Of the total<br />

inventoried individuals in the researched areas, 14%<br />

were represented by animals whose <strong>de</strong>ath was a result<br />

of the anthropogenic impact. Among these, 67% are<br />

represented by vipers killed <strong>de</strong>liberately, most having<br />

a crushed skull, and 33% are road kills, especially in<br />

spring when these reptiles prefer to bask directly on<br />

road asphalt (figure 1).<br />

67%<br />

33%<br />

Fig. 1. The raport Road kill/Direct kill<br />

road kills<br />

direct kills<br />

The estimation of population viability in<br />

Dumbraveni Natural Reserve, Babadag Forest,<br />

Priopcea Hill, Macin Mountains National Park, Gura<br />

Dobrogei Natural Reserve, the ruins of Adamclisi<br />

fortress, Canaraua Fetii Natural Reserve, Rusalka,<br />

Kaliakra, Bolata Dèrè, Yaillata and Kamen Bryag<br />

evi<strong>de</strong>nced the fact that the number of juveniles<br />

compared to that of adults is relatively high in these<br />

areas, which could thus indicate a high viability of<br />

these populations. As a whole, the situation is<br />

graphically illustrated in figure 2.<br />

In what regards the abundance of individuals in<br />

the researched populations, it was observed that in<br />

locations such as Gura Dobrogei, Babadag,<br />

Dumbraveni, Adamclisi, Hagieni, Canaraua Fetii and<br />

Bolata Dèrè, the number of i<strong>de</strong>ntified individuals is<br />

higher (figure 3). Still, this aspect only leads to the


Marian Tudor / Ovidius University Annals - Biology-Ecology Series 14: 115-120 (2010)<br />

conclusion that these populations might be larger than<br />

the ones i<strong>de</strong>ntified and investigated. Also, this aspect<br />

must be correlated with the number of field hours<br />

spent in each location. If the number of field<br />

hours spent in the Romanian Dobrudja is<br />

approximately equal (generally over 100 hours) in<br />

each location, the number of hours spent in the<br />

locations of the Bulgarian Dobrudja is much lower<br />

(an average of 10-12 hours per location). This is why<br />

it is very likely that the number of individuals in the<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntified populations could be much higher in the<br />

Bulgarian locations. Consi<strong>de</strong>ring the time spent in<br />

each location, the relative preservation of the<br />

habitats, as well the effort of capturing the animals,<br />

all these bring arguments in favor of this hypothesis.<br />

Otherwise, in what regards these populations in<br />

the Bulgarian si<strong>de</strong> of Dobrudja, the data collected<br />

over the 2008 research season evi<strong>de</strong>nce a relatively<br />

good preservation of the nose horned viper in the<br />

natural and semi-natural habitats. No road kills or<br />

direct kills were discovered in these areas, probably<br />

due to the fact that these habitats are located at a<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>rable distance from roads and spaces<br />

<strong>de</strong>dicated to activities with anthropogenic impact.<br />

Still, given that the data collected here were gathered<br />

over a period of only a few months, it is possible that<br />

direct kills could occur sporadically due to tourism or<br />

animal grazing [20].<br />

At the same time, we estimate that the new<br />

buildings, as well as the s<strong>ale</strong> of lands that shelter<br />

vipers to investors, will lead to the <strong>de</strong>struction of<br />

their specific habitats in Bulgaria too. In both<br />

countries, the expansion of constructions and road<br />

improvement with the purpose of easing transport but<br />

also of facilitating the access of mass tourism to wild<br />

areas, will lead to the enhancement of the<br />

anthropogenic impact in areas where it either did not<br />

exist or it was sporadic.<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

The main conclusion of the study is that<br />

Dobrudja, as biogeographical area well<br />

circumscribed and with particular characteristics<br />

compared to the other parts of Europe situated at the<br />

same latitu<strong>de</strong>, still hosts viable populations of the<br />

montandoni horned viper subspecies;<br />

117<br />

The most serious danger for the preservation of<br />

this subspecies of horned viper is represented by the<br />

<strong>de</strong>struction of habitats. Immediately after come the<br />

road kills and direct kills.<br />

The populations of Vipera ammodytes<br />

montandoni in Dobrudja are isolated one from the<br />

other, therefore we believe that there are few<br />

exchanges of individuals among them or that these<br />

exchanges lack completely in some cases, leading<br />

thus to the reduction of the intra-population genetic<br />

diversity;<br />

Our data argument for the existence of at least<br />

12 areas that shelter viable populations of nose<br />

horned vipers in Dobrodja. These areas are:<br />

Dumbraveni Natural Reserve, Babadag Forest,<br />

Priopcea Hill, Macin Mountains National Park, Gura<br />

Dobrogei Natural Reserve, the ruins of Adamclisi<br />

fortress, Canaraua Fetii Natural Reserve, Rusalka,<br />

Kaliakra, Bolata Dèrè, Yaillata and Kamen Bryag.<br />

Future studies will focus on the estimation of<br />

intra-population genetic diversity and on the<br />

dynamics of certain populations of this subspecies in<br />

or<strong>de</strong>r to propose the best measures inten<strong>de</strong>d for the<br />

preservation of the Dobrudja nose horned viper.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

This study was partly possible thanks to the<br />

UNDP/GEF Atlas Project no. 047111 “The<br />

strengthening of the national system of protected<br />

areas in Romania through the best management<br />

practices in the Macin Mountains National Park.”<br />

The researches in the Bulgarian area of<br />

Dobrudja were possible thanks to the PHARE CBC<br />

2005 Romania-Bulgaria Program RO 2005/017-<br />

535.01.02.02 “Comparative studies regarding the<br />

biodiversity of coastal habitats, the anthropogenic<br />

impact and the possibilities for the conservation of<br />

important European habitats between Cape Midia<br />

(Romania) and Cape Kaliakra (Bulgaria).<br />

We are in<strong>de</strong>bted to:<br />

Dr. Dan Cogălniceanu and Dr. Marius Skolka<br />

for providing references, valuable advice and<br />

logistics.<br />

Dr. Zsolt Török and Dr. Paul Szekely for<br />

support and references.<br />

Dr. Olivia Chirobocea for the revising of the<br />

text and accurate English translation.


The present situation of the nose horned viper.../ Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 115-120 (2010)<br />

5. References<br />

[1] IFTIME, A. (2005) - Reptile. In: Cartea Roșie a<br />

vertebratelor României, 173–196.<br />

BOTNARIUC ,N. & TATOLE, V. (Eds.).<br />

Bucuresti: ed. Curtea Veche.[in Romanian].<br />

[2] GIBBONS, J.W. et. al. 2000 - The Global<br />

Decline of Reptiles, Déjà Vu Amphibians<br />

BioScience, Vol 50, No.8, 653-666.<br />

[3] TOROK, Z.1999 - Note privind distribuția<br />

spațiala a herpetofaunei în zona Culmii<br />

Pricopanului, Acta oecologica, 6, 57-62.<br />

[4] TOROK, Z. 2000 - Șerpii veninoși din România<br />

(Venomous snake of Romania), Petarda, no.6,<br />

Tulcea, Aves.<br />

[5] SOS, T., 2005 - Note preliminare privind<br />

distribuția spațiala a herpetofaunei <strong>de</strong> pe<br />

Culmea Pricopanului din Parcul Național Munții<br />

Măcin, Migrans, Târgu Mureș, 7(3), 8-10.<br />

[6] OTEL, V., 1997 - Investigatii herpetologice în<br />

zona munților Măcin și podișul Babadagului,<br />

Anal Șt. IDD, 1997, 71-77.<br />

[7] FUHN, I.E. & VANCEA, St. 1961 - Reptilia<br />

(Țestoase, Șopirle, Șerpi). In: Fauna RPR.Vol.<br />

14(2). Bucuresti: Edit. Aca<strong>de</strong>miei RPR. 338 [in<br />

Romanian].<br />

[8] MERTENS, R. & WERMUTH, H. (1960) - Die<br />

Amphibien und Reptilien Europas. Dritte<br />

Liste,nach <strong>de</strong>m Stand vom 1. Januar 1960.<br />

Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Wal<strong>de</strong>mar Kramer.<br />

264.<br />

[9] COVACIU-MARCOV S.D, GHIRA I.,<br />

CICORT-LUCACIU A.D., SAS I.,<br />

STRUGARIU A., BOGDAN H.V. -<br />

Contributions to knowledge regarding the<br />

geographical distribution of the herpetofauna of<br />

Dobrudja, Romania. North-Western Journal of<br />

Zoology Vol. 2, No. 2, 2006, 88-125<br />

[10] FUHN, I.E. (1969) - Broaste, serpi, sopirle.<br />

Bucuresti: Ed. Natura si Omul. 246 [In<br />

Romanian].<br />

[11] COSSWHITE, D.L., S.F. FOX, and THILL<br />

R.E. 1999 - Comparison of methods for<br />

monitoring reptiles and amphibians in upland<br />

forests of the Ouachita mountains, Proceedings<br />

of the Oklahoma Aca<strong>de</strong>my of Science 79:45-50.<br />

118<br />

[12] CAMPBELL, H.W., and S.P. CHRISTMAN<br />

1982 - Field techniques for herpetofaunal<br />

community analysis. 193-200 in N. J. Scott, Jr.,<br />

ed. Herpetological Communities, U.S.D.I. Fish<br />

and Wildlife Service, Wildlife Research Report<br />

13, Washington, D.C. 239 .<br />

[13] RYAN, T.J., PHILIPPI, T., LEIDEN, Y.A.,<br />

DORCAS, M.E., WIGLEY, T.B. and<br />

[14] GASC, J.-P., CABELA, A., CRNOBRHJA-<br />

ISAILOVIC, J.,DOLMEN, D.,<br />

GROSSENBACHER, K., HAFFNER,<br />

P.,LESCURE, J., MARTENS, H., MARTINEZ-<br />

RICA, J.P., MAURIN, H., OLIVEIRA, M.E.,<br />

SOFIANIDOU, T.S., VEITH, M. &<br />

ZUIDERWIJK, A.(Eds.) 1997 - Atlas of<br />

Amphibians and Reptiles in Europe.<br />

[15] ENGE, K.M. 2001 - The pitfalls of pitfall traps.<br />

Journal of Herpetology 35(3): 467-478.<br />

[16] FERNER, J. W. 1979. A review of marking<br />

techniques for amphibians and reptiles, Society<br />

for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles,<br />

Circular 9: 1-42.<br />

[17] KARNS, D.R. 1986 - Field herpetology:<br />

methods for the study of amphibians and<br />

reptiles, in Minnesota. James Ford Bell<br />

Museum of Natural History, occasional papers<br />

18.<br />

[18] CORN, P. S., and R. B. BURY. 1990 -<br />

Reptiles. USDA Forest Service, General and<br />

Technical Report PNW-GTR-256, 34.<br />

[19] ANDREI, M., 2002 - Contributions to the<br />

knowledge of the herpetofauna of southern<br />

Dobrudja (Romania). Trav. Mus. Nat. d'Hist.<br />

Nat. Gr. Antipa 44, 357-373<br />

[20] BOIAN, P.P. 2007 © Springer, Amphibians and<br />

Reptiles of Bulgaria: Fauna, Vertical<br />

Distribution and Consrvation, 85-107 , in<br />

Biogeography and Ecology of Bulgaria, V. Fet<br />

& A. Popov (eds.)


The present situation of the nose horned viper.../ Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 115-120 (2010)<br />

Rusalka<br />

Yailata<br />

Kamen Bryag<br />

Kaliacra<br />

Bolata Dèrè<br />

Canaraua Fetii<br />

Hagieni<br />

Adamclisi<br />

Dumbrăveni<br />

Babadag<br />

Gura Dobrogei<br />

Măcin<br />

Priopcea<br />

Niculiţel<br />

Târguşor<br />

Cerna<br />

Albesti<br />

Şipotele<br />

Casimcea<br />

Atmagea<br />

Beştepe<br />

Cataloi<br />

0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00% 10.00% 12.00%<br />

119<br />

Juveniles<br />

Adults<br />

Fig. 2. The percentage of adults and juveniles in the analyzed populations


Marian Tudor / Ovidius University Annals - Biology-Ecology Series 14: 115-120 (2010)<br />

Canaraua Fetii<br />

Hagieni<br />

Adamclisi<br />

Dumbrăveni<br />

Babadag<br />

Gura Dobrogei<br />

Măcin<br />

Yailata<br />

Bolata Déré<br />

Kaliakra<br />

Priopcea<br />

Rusalka<br />

Kamen Bryag<br />

Niculiţel<br />

Târguşor<br />

Cerna<br />

Albesti<br />

Şipotele<br />

Casimcea<br />

Atmagea<br />

Beştepe<br />

Cataloi<br />

0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00% 10.00% 12.00% 14.00% 16.00%<br />

Fig. 3. The abundance of Nose-Horned Viper in the analyzed populations<br />

120


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

BODY SIZE VARIATION IN RANA TEMPORARIA POPULATIONS<br />

INHABITING EXTREME ENVIRONMENTS<br />

Rodica PLĂIAŞU ** , Raluca BĂNCILĂ ** , Dan COGĂLNICEANU *<br />

* Ovidius University Constanţa, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Aleea Universităţii nr. 1,<br />

corp B, Constanţa 900470, Romania<br />

** “Emil Racoviţă” Institute of Speleology, 13 Septembrie Road, No. 13, Bucharest 050711, Romania<br />

___________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: We studied the variation in body size in populations of a wi<strong>de</strong>spread anuran species, Rana<br />

temporaria, from high altitu<strong>de</strong> and latitu<strong>de</strong>s. Our results indicated a variable interannual pattern of body size,<br />

suggesting that body size in extreme environments is influenced by many factors. This indicates that long-term<br />

series of observations are nee<strong>de</strong>d to separate natural fluctuations from man-induced changes.<br />

Keywords: Rana temporaria, extreme environments, body size, interannual variation<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

During the last <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s, many amphibian<br />

species have <strong>de</strong>clined from high altitu<strong>de</strong> area, even in<br />

habitats apparently without human impact [1, 2]. The<br />

causes of some <strong>de</strong>clines remain unknown.<br />

Un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of the life history characteristics of<br />

the amphibian populations that inhabit extreme<br />

environments at high altitu<strong>de</strong> and latitu<strong>de</strong> is an<br />

important step in the evaluation process of the<br />

potential causes of <strong>de</strong>cline. Genetic and<br />

environmental factors (e.g. temperature, rainfall,<br />

trophic resources, competition, predators) <strong>de</strong>termine<br />

variation in the life history traits of species<br />

occupying a large geographic area [3]. Low<br />

temperature, associated with high altitu<strong>de</strong>/latitu<strong>de</strong>,<br />

reduces the activity period and the time available for<br />

resource exploitation [4]. Temperature affects the<br />

duration of hatching and metamorphosis in<br />

amphibians. The increase in the adult body size has<br />

been frequently associated with a cold annual<br />

temperature [5, 6]. Most studies of variation in<br />

amphibians body size have focused on latitudinal and<br />

altitudinal variation, e.g. trying to establish if the<br />

amphibian species follow the Bergmann’s rule [7, 8].<br />

Studies on the interannual variations in amphibians<br />

body size generally analyze difference in body<br />

condition [9, 10], or variation in age and size at<br />

maturity [6].<br />

The Common Frog (Rana temporaria) is the<br />

most wi<strong>de</strong>spread amphibian species in Europe [11].<br />

Its distribution reaches 71 o N in Fennoscandia [12]<br />

and it can be found even at altitu<strong>de</strong>s of 2600 m [12].<br />

The wi<strong>de</strong> altitudinal and latitudinal range of this<br />

species, allows comparisons of life-history traits over<br />

a broad range of conditions. In a previous publication<br />

we analyzed the altitudinal and latitudinal body size<br />

variation among populations from high altitu<strong>de</strong> and<br />

latitu<strong>de</strong> of R. temporaria testing if the variation<br />

pattern is according to the Bergmann’s rule [13]. In<br />

this study we analyzed interannual body size<br />

variation in the same Rana temporaria populations,<br />

in or<strong>de</strong>r to evaluate if the pattern of variation in body<br />

size changes in time. We tested the following<br />

predictions: i) there is no interannual variation in<br />

body size and ii) the mean body size of the frog<br />

populations from subarctic regions shows significant<br />

variation during a growth season.<br />

2. Material and Methods<br />

R. temporaria populations were studied from<br />

Kilpisjarvi, Finland (latitu<strong>de</strong> N 69 o ) in 2003 (August)<br />

and 2009 (July), Kolari, Finland (latitu<strong>de</strong> 67.2 o ) in<br />

2009 (July) and in Retezat National Park, Romania<br />

(latitu<strong>de</strong> N 45 o ) in 2004 (September) and 2009<br />

(August). Latitu<strong>de</strong> and altitu<strong>de</strong> were recor<strong>de</strong>d for<br />

each population by using a handheld Garmin GPS.<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


Body size variation in Rana tempoaria populations / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 121-126 (2010)<br />

Captured individuals were sexed, weighed (W)<br />

to the nearest 0.01 g with a portable electronic<br />

balance (AccuLab Pocket Pro), and snout-vent length<br />

(SVL) was measured to the nearest 0.5 mm with dialcalipers.<br />

Data were log transformed prior to analyses.<br />

For comparisons between years and sites we used<br />

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and<br />

Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to compare the<br />

slopes of the regression lines.<br />

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS ver.<br />

10.0 (SPSS Inc., 1999).<br />

3. Results and Discussions<br />

A total of 347 individuals were measured and<br />

weighed in 2003/2004, of which 237 juveniles and<br />

110 adults (67 m<strong>ale</strong>s and 43 fem<strong>ale</strong>s) and 157<br />

individuals in 2009 (66 juveniles, 43 fem<strong>ale</strong>s and 48<br />

m<strong>ale</strong>s). Both log transformed W and SVL were<br />

normally distributed (W: D = 5.06, p < 0.001;<br />

122<br />

SVL: D = 3.75, p < 0.001). The body size indices of<br />

the studied populations are presented in Tables 1 and<br />

2. There was no significant difference in SVL<br />

between Retezat National Park and Finland -<br />

Kilisjarvi populations. We found significant<br />

differences in the mean body size indices between<br />

the two stations from Finland (Table 3).<br />

We then compared W and SVL from different years<br />

for the same population. We found significant<br />

differences in the interannual variation of the body<br />

size indices for juveniles in both Finland and Retezat<br />

populations, and in the mean weight for fem<strong>ale</strong>s.<br />

M<strong>ale</strong>s showed only in Retezat a significant<br />

interannual variation in the body size indices (Table<br />

4). We also compared the slopes of the regression<br />

lines of W as a function of SVL. The slopes of the<br />

regression lines are significantly different for all<br />

adults in Retezat and Finland (Fig. 1: F1,56= 81.41,<br />

p


Rodica Plăiaşu et al. / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 121-126 (2010)<br />

Table 3. Comparison of SVL and W between the three R. temporaria populations, by using ANCOVA (FN =<br />

Finland - Kilpisjarvi; FS = Finland - Kolari, RNP = Retezat high altitu<strong>de</strong>; N = sample size, *P < 0.05, ***P <<br />

0.001, NS = not significant).<br />

W SVL<br />

N Average Fa Average Fa<br />

FN vs FS FN FS FS FN FS FN<br />

Fem<strong>ale</strong> 13 16 18.956 14.308 6.069* 71.244 61.154 26.384***<br />

M<strong>ale</strong> 17 9 17.267 15.853 0.737 NS<br />

69.89 62.46 22.88***<br />

Juveniles 50 9 4.333 7.779 10.381* 42.17 45.95 1.748 NS<br />

FN vs RNP FN RNP FN RNP FN RNP<br />

Fem<strong>ale</strong> 13 14 14.308 34.69 19.504*** 61.154 76.78 3.627 NS<br />

M<strong>ale</strong> 17 22 15.853 36.20 17.93*** 62.46 73.41 1.778 NS<br />

Juveniles 50 7 7.779 9.28 5.903* 45.95 44.8 0.198 NS<br />

Table 4. Comparison of the interannual variation in SVL and W between the three R. temporaria populations, by<br />

using ANCOVA (FN = Finland - Kilpisjarvi; FS = Finland - Kolari, RNP = Retezat high altitu<strong>de</strong>; N = sample<br />

size, *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, NS = not significant).<br />

W SVL<br />

N Average Fa Average Fa<br />

FN 2003 vs. 2009 2003 2009 2003 2009 2003 2009<br />

Fem<strong>ale</strong> 29 13 31 14.308 4.235* 65.94 61.154 3.70 NS<br />

M<strong>ale</strong> 32 17 31.76 15.853 3.713 NS<br />

67.59 62.46 0.43 NS<br />

Juveniles 197 50 3.17 7.779 78.41*** 29.01 45.95 120.01***<br />

RNP 2004 vs. 2009 2004 2009 2004 2009 2004 2009<br />

Fem<strong>ale</strong> 14 14 61.16 34.69 14.56*** 82.7 76.78 2.24 NS<br />

M<strong>ale</strong> 35 22 47.14 36.20 12.21*** 77.07 73.41 4.49*<br />

Juveniles 40 7 2.19 9.28 22.56*** 24.42 44.8 19.4***<br />

The variation in the adult body size reported in<br />

amphibians can be induced by several factors,<br />

including genetic and environmental differences,<br />

such as: duration of the activity period, food<br />

availability and climatic conditions [6, 14]. Laugen<br />

et al. (2005) found that body size <strong>de</strong>creased with<br />

latitu<strong>de</strong> in the Scandinavian Common Frog<br />

populations. Comparisons between populations from<br />

Western Europe with different activity periods report<br />

increases in the mean length, as activity period gets<br />

shorter [6]. Rana temporaria populations from the<br />

analyzed area show a variable pattern in weight and<br />

length. Băncilă et al. (2010) found that latitudinal and<br />

altitudinal variation patterns in juvenile body size<br />

123<br />

were according to the Bergmann’s rule. We found an<br />

opposite pattern for juveniles, with <strong>de</strong>creases in the<br />

body size as the activity period gets shorter. Since<br />

juveniles have higher growth and <strong>de</strong>velopment rate<br />

than adults, difference could be observed even in the<br />

case of short periods of time between sampling.<br />

Interpopulational variation in the adult body size<br />

could be caused by differences in the age structure.<br />

Growth rates in amphibian species can dramatically<br />

<strong>de</strong>crease after the attainment of sexual maturity (e.g.<br />

Miaud et al. 1999). Thus, <strong>de</strong>layed reproduction can<br />

allow a prolonged growth period and the attainment<br />

of a larger adult size.


Body size variation in Rana tempoaria populations / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 121-126 (2010)<br />

W (log)<br />

2.0<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

1.75 1.80 1.85 1.90 1.95 2.00<br />

SVL (log)<br />

RNP 2004<br />

RNP 2009<br />

Fig. 1. Body size indices for m<strong>ale</strong>s in RNP<br />

populations, 2004 (N=35; R 2 = 0.72) and 2009 (N=22;<br />

R 2 = 0.90).<br />

W (log)<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

1.65 1.70 1.75 1.80 1.85 1.90 1.95<br />

SVL (log)<br />

Kilpisjarvi 2003<br />

Kilpisjarvi 2009<br />

Fig. 3. Body size indices for fem<strong>ale</strong>s in Finland-<br />

Kilpisjarvi, 2003 (N=29; R 2 = 0.63) and 2009 (N=13;<br />

R 2 = 0.59).<br />

W (log)<br />

1.6<br />

1.5<br />

1.4<br />

1.3<br />

1.2<br />

1.1<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

Kolari<br />

Kilpisjarvi<br />

1.70 1.75 1.80 1.85 1.90 1.95<br />

SVL (log)<br />

Fig. 5. Body size indices for fem<strong>ale</strong>s in Finland<br />

Kilspijarvi (N=13; R 2 = 0.59) and Finland Kolari 2009<br />

(N=16; R 2 = 0.71).<br />

124<br />

W (log)<br />

2.2<br />

2.0<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

1.70 1.75 1.80 1.85 1.90 1.95 2.00 2.05<br />

SVL (log)<br />

RNP 2004<br />

RNP 2009<br />

Fig. 2. Body size indices for fem<strong>ale</strong>s in RNP<br />

populations, 2004 (N=14; R 2 = 0.75) and 2009 (N=14;<br />

R 2 = 0.95).<br />

W (log)<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

Kilpisjarvi 2003<br />

Kilpisjarvi 2009<br />

1.74 1.76 1.78 1.80 1.82 1.84 1.86 1.88<br />

SVL (log)<br />

Fig. 4. Body size indices for m<strong>ale</strong>s in Finland-<br />

Kilpisjarvi, 2003 (N=32; R 2 = 0.70) and 2009 (N=17;<br />

R 2 = 0.63).<br />

W (log)<br />

1.5<br />

1.4<br />

1.3<br />

1.2<br />

1.1<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

Kolari<br />

Kilpisjarvi<br />

1.74 1.76 1.78 1.80 1.82 1.84 1.86 1.88 1.90<br />

SVL (log)<br />

Fig. 6. Body size indices for m<strong>ale</strong>s in Finland<br />

Kilpisjarvi (N=17; R 2 = 0.89) and Finland Kolari 2009<br />

(N=9; R 2 = 0.70).


Rodica Plăiaşu et al. / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 121-126 (2010)<br />

Factors such as temperature and humidity can<br />

directly affect the activity period and the<br />

availability of food, influencing the growth rate and<br />

the fat stores; hence they could consequently<br />

<strong>de</strong>termine significant interannual variation in the<br />

body size. Populations from both analyzed areas<br />

exhibit interannual variation in weight and length.<br />

This variation mainly affects the weight and could<br />

be the result of the differences in the sampling<br />

period. The pattern of the adult size variation could<br />

also directly result from the variation in the<br />

population age structure. Further analyses are<br />

necessary to <strong>de</strong>termine whether variation in the age<br />

structure are contributing or not to the interannual<br />

body size indices. Results suggest that many factors<br />

affect the body size in extreme environment and<br />

long-term series of observations are nee<strong>de</strong>d in or<strong>de</strong>r<br />

to separate natural fluctuations from the human<br />

impact/global warming.<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

This study stresses the importance of analyzing<br />

interannual variation of life history traits, because<br />

one-year data may not properly reflect the features<br />

of a population and this issue becomes important in<br />

the context of global changes and their possible<br />

effects on the amphibian populations.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

The research was fun<strong>de</strong>d by the EU FP6<br />

(Lapbiat) and EU FP7 (Lapbiat 2) Romanian<br />

CNCSIS grant 1114/2004. We are grateful to<br />

Claudia Jianu, Dorel Ruşti, Ioan Ghira and Marian<br />

Tudor for their help during fieldwork.<br />

5. References<br />

[1] LAURANCE W.F., McDonald K.R., Speare R.,<br />

1996 - Epi<strong>de</strong>mic disease and the catastrophic<br />

<strong>de</strong>cline of Australian rain forest frogs.<br />

Conservation Biology, 10: 406-413.<br />

[2] YOUNG B.E., Lips K.R., Reaser J.K., Ibanez<br />

R., Salas A.W., Ce<strong>de</strong>no J.R., Coloma L.A., Ron<br />

S., La Marca E., Meyer J.R., Munoz A., Bolanos<br />

F., Chaves G., Romo D. 2001. Population<br />

<strong>de</strong>clines and priorities for amphibian<br />

125<br />

conservation in Latin America. Conservation<br />

Biology, 15: 1213-1223.<br />

[3] SORCI G., Clobert J., Belichon S., 1996 -<br />

Phenotypic plasticity of growth and survival in<br />

the common lizard Lacerta vivipara. Journal of<br />

Animal Ecology, 65: 781-790.<br />

[4] RYSER J., 1996 - Comparative life histories of<br />

a low- and a high-elevation population of the<br />

common frog Rana temporaria. Amphibia–<br />

Reptilia, 17: 183-195.<br />

[5] FICETOLA G.F., Scali S., Denoël M.,<br />

Montinaro G., Vukov T.J., Zuffi M.A.L., Padoa-<br />

Schioppa E., 2010 - Ecogeographical variation of<br />

body size in the newt Triturus carnifex:<br />

comparing the hypotheses using an informationtheoretic<br />

approach. Global Ecology and<br />

Biogeography, 19: 485-495.<br />

[6] MIAUD C., Guyétant R., Elmberg J., 1999 -<br />

Variations in life-history traits in the common<br />

frog (Rana temporaria) (Amphibia: Anura): a<br />

literature review and new data from the French<br />

Alps. Journal of Zoology, 249: 61-73.<br />

[7] ADAMS D.C., Church J.O., 2008 - Amphibians<br />

do not follow Bergmann’s rule. Evolution, 62:<br />

413-420.<br />

[8] ASHTON K.G., 2002 - Do amphibians follow<br />

Bergmann’s rule? Canadian Journal of Zoology,<br />

80: 708-716.<br />

[9] TOMAŠEVIĆ N., Cvetković D., Aleksić I.,<br />

Crnobrnja-Isailović J., 2007 - The effect of<br />

climatic conditions on post-hibernation body<br />

condition and reproductive traits of Bufo bufo<br />

fem<strong>ale</strong>s. Archives of Biological Sciences,<br />

Belgra<strong>de</strong>, 59: 51-52.<br />

[10] TOMAŠEVIĆ N., Cvetković D., Miaud C.,<br />

Aleksić I., Crnobrnja-Isailović J., 2008 -<br />

Interannual variation in life history traits between<br />

neighbouring populations of the wi<strong>de</strong>spread<br />

amphibian Bufo bufo. Revue d’Ecologie (Terre et<br />

Vie), 63: 371-381.<br />

[11] GASC J.P., Cabela A., Crnobrnja-Isailovic J.,<br />

Dolmen D., Grossenbacher K., Haffner P.,<br />

Lescure J., Martens H., Martínez Rica J.P.,<br />

Maurin H., Oliveira M.E., Sofianidou T.S., Veith<br />

M., Zui<strong>de</strong>rwijk A. (ed), 1997 - Atlas of<br />

Amphibians and Reptiles in Europe. Collection<br />

Patrimoines Naturels, 29, Societas Europaea<br />

Herpetologica, Muséum National d'Histoire


Body size variation in Rana tempoaria populations / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 121-126 (2010)<br />

Naturelle & Service du Petrimone Naturel, Paris,<br />

496 pp.<br />

[12] MERILÄ J., Laurila A., Laugen A.T.,<br />

Rasanen K., Pahkla M., 2000 - Plasticity in age<br />

and size at metamorphosis in Rana temporaria -<br />

comparison of high and low latitu<strong>de</strong> populations.<br />

Ecography, 23: 457-465.<br />

[13] BĂNCILĂ R.I., Plăiaşu R., Cogălniceanu, D.,<br />

2010 - Effect of latitu<strong>de</strong> and altitu<strong>de</strong> on body size<br />

in the common frog (Rana temporaria)<br />

126<br />

populations. Studii <strong>şi</strong> Cercetări, Biologie,<br />

Universitatea din Bacău,17: 43-46.<br />

[14] MORRISON C., Hero J., 2002 - Geographic<br />

variation in life history characteristics of<br />

amphibians: a review. Journal of Animal<br />

Ecology, 72: 270-279.<br />

[15] LAUGEN A.T., Laurila A., Jönsson K.I.,<br />

Sö<strong>de</strong>rman F., Merilä J., 2005 - Do common frogs<br />

(Rana temporaria) follow Bergmann’s rule?<br />

Evolutionary Ecology Research, 7: 717-731.


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

UTILIZATION OF EPIFLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY AND DIGITAL IMAGE<br />

ANALYSIS TO STUDY SOME MORPHOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL ASPECTS<br />

OF PROKARYOTES<br />

Simona GHIŢĂ ** , Iris SARCHIZIAN * , Ioan ARDELEAN ***<br />

* Ovidius University of Constanţa, Natural Sciences Faculty, Department of Biology,<br />

Mamaia Avenue, No. 124, Constanţa, 900552, Romania,<br />

e-mail: ghitasimona@aim.com, irissarchizian@yahoo.com<br />

** Constanta Maritime University, Department of Environmental Engineering, Mircea cel Batrin, No. 104,<br />

Constanta, 900663, Romania, e-mail:ghitasimona@aim.com;<br />

*** Institute of Biology, Splaiul In<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nţei, No. 296, Bucharest, 060031, Romania,<br />

email:ioan.ar<strong>de</strong>lean57@yahoo.com<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: The aims of this study is to argue, based on original results, the importance of utilization of<br />

epifluorescence microscopy to study some morphological and functional aspects of prokaryotes allowing to<br />

perform total cell counts , direct viable count count, count of permeabilised cells, chlorophyll containing cells or<br />

putatively capsulated cells. Automated image analysis of the results thus obtained was done using CellC and<br />

ImageJ software which allow the quantification of bacterial cells from digital microscope images, automated<br />

enumeration of bacterial cells, comparison of total count and specific count images, providing also quantitative<br />

estimates of cell morphology.<br />

Keywords: epifluorescence, digital image analysis, heterotrophic bacteria, cyanobacteria.<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The use of epifluorescence microscopy to study<br />

different aspects of prokaryotes at population and<br />

single cell level significantly improved the<br />

knowledge concerning which species are present in a<br />

given sample, the cell <strong>de</strong>nsity and the metabolic<br />

statues of the population as a whole or of each single<br />

prokaryote cell (Van Wambeke, 1995; Manini &<br />

Danovaro, 2006; Falcioni et al., 2008; Kirchman,<br />

2008; Ar<strong>de</strong>lean et al., 2009). In the last <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s there<br />

is also an increase in the <strong>de</strong>velopment and use of<br />

different softwares for automated analysis of the<br />

digital images thus obtained (Ishii et al. 1987; Estep<br />

& Macintyre 1989; Embleton et al., 2003; Walsby,<br />

1996; Congestri et al. 2003; Selinummi et al., 2005,<br />

2008).<br />

The aims of this study is to argue, based on<br />

original results, the importance of utilization of<br />

epifluorescence microscopy coupled with automated<br />

image analysis to study some morphological and<br />

functional aspects of prokaryotes allowing to<br />

perform total cell counts (acridine orange, DAPI,<br />

SYBR Green 1), direct viable count (elongated cell in<br />

the presence of nalidixic acid, labelled with acridine<br />

orange), count of permeabilised cells (cells<br />

permeable to propidium iodi<strong>de</strong>), putatively<br />

capsulated cell (labelled with aniline blue) and<br />

chlorophyll containing cells both in enriched cultures<br />

and in natural (microcosms) samples.<br />

2. Material and Methods<br />

A. Study area and sampling. Samples were<br />

collected in sterile bottles in October 2008 and May<br />

2009 from sulphurous mesothermal spring (Obanul<br />

Mare) placed in north of Mangalia City<br />

(43˚49’53.6’’N; 28˚34’05.3’’E). The samples were<br />

divi<strong>de</strong>d in sub-samples, one being immediately fixed<br />

with buffered formal<strong>de</strong>hy<strong>de</strong> (2% final concentration)<br />

and the second one used to isolate cyanobacteria by<br />

inoculation into conical flasks with either BG11<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


Utilization of epifluorescence microscopy…/ Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 127-137 (2010)<br />

medium or nitrate - free BG11 medium (BG0)<br />

(Rippka et al., 1979). Another series of natural<br />

samples were collected from Black Sea (Tomis<br />

seaport at 0.5m <strong>de</strong>pth; 44 o 10 ’ 44 ’’ N; 28 o 39 ’ 32 ’’ E) in<br />

March 2009.<br />

B. Culture conditions. Natural samples<br />

inoculated in either BG11 or BG0 media, either solid<br />

of liquid, were incubated in culture room at 25 ± 1ºC<br />

and illuminated with fluorescent tubes having the<br />

photon rate of 50 μmol m –2 s –1 at surface of the<br />

culture vessels.<br />

C. Microcosms. Taking into account the<br />

advantages of microcosms (Iturbe et al., 2003;<br />

Molina-Barahona et al., 2004) we used this<br />

opportunity as previously (Ar<strong>de</strong>lean et al., 2009).<br />

D. Total cell count (AO; DAPI, SYBR Green<br />

I)<br />

Total bacterial count were performed using<br />

acridine orange, DAPI and SYBR Green I (Luna et<br />

al., 2002; Lunau et al., 2005; Manini & Danovaro,<br />

2006).<br />

For AO and DAPI (5 μg/mL dye final<br />

concentrations) subsamples were stained for 5<br />

minutes and were filtred on black Millipore 0,22µm<br />

pore size filters. Unlike AO, using DAPI for bacterial<br />

visualization and enumeration has the advantages of<br />

low background fluorescence and that DAPI stains<br />

only DNA.<br />

For SG (1µL/10µL sample final concentrations)<br />

subsamples were stained for 10 minutes and were<br />

filtred on black Millipore 0,22 µm pore size filters.<br />

Color filters were washed with 10 ml of 17 ‰ saline<br />

solution. SG as a permeant DNA-binding stain and<br />

<strong>de</strong>termine the total fraction of cells from natural<br />

samples.<br />

E. Permeabilized (<strong>de</strong>ad) cells (PI+)<br />

PI is a double-charged phenanthridium<br />

<strong>de</strong>rivative and is one of the most common stains for<br />

<strong>de</strong>ad cells (Luna et al., 2002). PI is thus assumed to<br />

be unable to penetrate cell membranes. In our natural<br />

samples we used a PI concentration of 5 μL/ml<br />

sample. Also stained samples were filtered through<br />

black Millipore 0,22 µm pore size filters and then<br />

inspected un<strong>de</strong>r a epifluorescence microscope. The<br />

disruption of planktonic cell aggregates for cell<br />

enumeration were done as previously shown<br />

(Ar<strong>de</strong>lean et al., 2009).<br />

128<br />

F. Enumeration of (putatively) capsulated<br />

cells (AB+). Cell capsule was also inspected using<br />

aniline blue (AB) which is a fluorescent dye specific<br />

which seems to be specific for 1,3 beta glucans<br />

(Hong et al., 2001) found in plants and as capsular<br />

material in many microorganisms (Nakanishi et al.,<br />

1976; McIntosh et al., 2005). Capsular envelopes are<br />

wi<strong>de</strong>ly distributed in marine free-living and particleassociated<br />

bacteria (Heissenberger et al., 1996) and<br />

are a signature of active bacteria (Sto<strong>de</strong>regger &<br />

Herndl, 2002). Bacteria with an intact intracellular<br />

structure, and therefore potentially active bacteria,<br />

are surroun<strong>de</strong>d by a capsular layer, while the vast<br />

majority of bacteria with a damaged structure lack<br />

such a capsule (Heissenberger et al., 1996).<br />

Laboratory experiments indicated that active bacteria<br />

are constantly renewing their capsular envelope and<br />

releasing a significant fraction of the polysacchari<strong>de</strong><br />

layer into the ambient water (Sto<strong>de</strong>regger & Herndl,<br />

2002). The samples were treated with AB (5 µg/mL<br />

final concentration) for 5 minutes and then filtered<br />

and counted as shown above for AO staining .<br />

G. The automatic cell analysis were done with<br />

two software ImageJ and CellC, who was applied to<br />

digital images of whole cells color-stained bacteria<br />

and cyanobacteria. The analysis proceeds few<br />

important steps: the background is separated from the<br />

objects based on the intra-class variance threshold<br />

method; noise and specks of staining color in the<br />

image can affect the reliability of the analysis, so<br />

those was removed. The removal was done applying<br />

mathematical morphology operations to the image;<br />

then separation of clustered objects was performed<br />

(Selinummi, 2008). The length of cells was<br />

<strong>de</strong>termined with ImageJ software using a calibration<br />

sc<strong>ale</strong>.<br />

H. Cyanobacteria (natural fluorescence)<br />

Visualization of hydrocarbon tolerant<br />

phototrophic microorganisms, also for unicellular or<br />

filamentous cyanobacteria from sulphurous<br />

mesothermal spring; chlorophyll a in natural<br />

environments (either marine or spring) was done<br />

using an epifluorescence microscope (N-400FL, lamp<br />

Hg 100W, type on the blue filter; Sherr et al., 2001)<br />

as previously shown (Ar<strong>de</strong>lean et al., 2009).<br />

I. Direct viable count (cells capable of<br />

division) is based on the Kogure method <strong>de</strong>velopped


Simona Ghiţă et al. / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 127-137 (2010)<br />

by incubation of samples with a single antimicrobial<br />

agent (nalidixic acid) and nutrients (yeast extract).<br />

Nalidixic acid acts as a specific inhibitor of DNA<br />

synthesis and prevents cell division without affecting<br />

other cellular metabolic activities, including cell<br />

growth; thus viable cells growth but do not divi<strong>de</strong>,<br />

thus becoming longer/larger than cells unable to grow<br />

(Kogure et al., 1979). Experiments were done with<br />

40mL samples from each microcosms in which the<br />

sample was filtered through 0.45 µm filter (2 and 3)<br />

supplemented with yeast extract (50 mg / L final<br />

concentration), nalidixic acid (20 mg / L final<br />

concentration) (Kogure et al., 1979) and gasoline<br />

(0.5% final concentration); 17 hours before the start<br />

of experiment all samples were kept in an incubator<br />

at a temperature of 30 o C and continuous stirring.<br />

Subsequently samples were incubated un<strong>de</strong>r the<br />

conditions previously reported and samples were<br />

harvested each two hours (consi<strong>de</strong>ring the time To,<br />

T1 –after 2 hours, T2- after 4 hours; T3- after 6 hours,<br />

T4- after 8 hours).<br />

3. Results and Discussions<br />

1. Total count cell (AO+, DAPI+), permeable<br />

(<strong>de</strong>ad) cells (PI+) and (putative) capsulated cells<br />

(AB+)<br />

In experimental microcosms we viewed the<br />

gasoline tolerant/oxidizing bacteria to make a clear<br />

distinction between the total number of cells (stained<br />

with AO, DAPI), the number of encapsulated, active<br />

cells, (AB +), and the number of permeable (PI+) ,<br />

<strong>de</strong>ad (figures 1 and 3).<br />

Fig 1. Comparison between the total cell count (AO+<br />

and DAPI+) and permeable cells <strong>de</strong>nsity (IP+)<br />

129<br />

As shown in figure 1 the total number of<br />

heterotrophic cells counted using AO or DAPI is<br />

practically the same. Quantification was performed<br />

on samples previously fixed in experimental<br />

microcosms (M1 and M2). Comparing the total<br />

number of bacterial cells obtained with AO and<br />

DAPI stained (20 μL/mL sample) in experimental<br />

microcosms, we have shown that there are no<br />

significant differences in the use of two<br />

fluorochromes on natural samples (M1: 13.719,5<br />

cells ml -1 – SD (±39,7) AO and 13.494,6 cells ml -1 -<br />

SD (±22,2) DAPI, respectively M2: 14.619,1 cells<br />

ml -1 – SD (±28,8) AO and 15.787,4 cells ml -1 SD<br />

(±32,8) DAPI).<br />

Fig 2. Total number of cells obtained using AO and<br />

SG in natural sample<br />

To assess the number of cells obtained after<br />

staining AO and SG, we used unfixed samples<br />

collected from microcosm 1.<br />

As shown in figure 2 there are differences in<br />

total counts obtained by the use of either AO or<br />

SYBR Green 1, the higher count obtained with the<br />

last fluorochrome (47,6%) being due to its higher<br />

fluorescence yield, in agreement with international<br />

literature (Weinbauer et al., 1998; Luna et al., 2002;<br />

Lunau et al., 2005 ), allowing the visualization of<br />

smaller cells.<br />

As shown in figure 1, the number of <strong>de</strong>ad cells<br />

(PI positive) is 12.3% of the total number obtained<br />

with the two fluorochromes, AO and DAPI.<br />

In figure 3 one can see the cell <strong>de</strong>nsities of<br />

putative capsulated cells which are 10% from the<br />

<strong>de</strong>nsity obtained with acridine orange.


Utilization of epifluorescence microscopy…/ Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 127-137 (2010)<br />

Fig 3. Aniline blue positive cells as compared with<br />

acridine orange positive cells.<br />

2. Cyanobacteria (natural fluorescence)<br />

Natural fluorescence of these prokaryotic in<br />

various natural environments (marine and sulphurous<br />

mesothermal spring) and marine microcosms was<br />

studied by epifluorescence microscopy (figure 4).<br />

a b<br />

c d<br />

Fig 4. Natural fluorescence of gasoline-tolerant<br />

oxygenic phototrophic microorganism from<br />

microcosm 2 supplemented with gasoline (a);<br />

microcosm 1 supplemented with gasoline and<br />

nutrient (b) and microorganism isolated from<br />

sulphurous mesothermal spring Obanul Mare<br />

(Mangalia) (c and d).<br />

In microcosm 1 cyanobacteria filaments are<br />

much thinner (1.35 ± 0.27) compared with<br />

microcosm 2 (3.87 ± 0.57) (fig.5); the significance of<br />

this difference being un<strong>de</strong>r investigation.<br />

130<br />

Fig 5. Filaments of cyanobacteria in the M2.<br />

3. Direct viable count<br />

In figure 6 there are presented the results<br />

concerning changes in average cell lengths of<br />

bacterial populations from the two microcosms with<br />

filtered water (0,45µm) each supplemented with yest<br />

extract, nalidixic acid and gasoline (see Materials and<br />

methods).<br />

Fig 6. Average length of cells from To to T4 (after 8<br />

hours of incubation with nalidixic acid) in the two<br />

microcosms (M2 and control, M3)<br />

As can be seen in Figure 6, after 8 hours of<br />

incubations, the average length of M2 cells is about 7<br />

µm, compared with the M3 where the cells were<br />

maintained in high proportion in the form of cocci<br />

(average diameter of about 2 µm). These results<br />

argue the possibility to count viable cells, cells able<br />

to grow, by a relatively simple method. It seems<br />

appropriate to assume that the large increase in cell<br />

size in bacterial populations which have been<br />

previously selected to grow in the presence of<br />

gasoline (microcosms 2) is due to the cells ability to<br />

oxidize/tolerate gasoline, as compared with the<br />

populations sampled from the control microcosms<br />

where the proportion of gasoline tolerant bacteria is


Simona Ghiţă et al. / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 127-137 (2010)<br />

very low (and responsible for the low increase in the<br />

average cell lengths in M3). In M3 (control) one can<br />

see a rather constant length of some cells during<br />

incubation (2,15±0,37) whereas in M2 there was a<br />

sud<strong>de</strong>n increase in cell length (6,46±1,54) to the time<br />

T2 (4 hours incubation) then there was a steady<br />

increase until T4 (8 hours incubation).<br />

In Figure 7 are some random fields of cells in<br />

the two microcosms to highlight how cell elongation<br />

occurred from the T o to T4 only in M2.<br />

a b<br />

c d<br />

Fig 7. Evaluating cell elongation in microcosm 2 (a-<br />

To and b-T4) respectively in the control microcosm<br />

(c- To and d-T4)<br />

Digital Image Analysis and automated image<br />

analysis for epifluorescence<br />

The automated approach will not only remove<br />

the need for tedious manual analysis work, but also<br />

enable biologists to measure cellular features not<br />

feasible by the standard manual techniques<br />

(Selinummi, 2008).<br />

In our studies we used ImageJ software - a<br />

public domain Java image processing and analysis<br />

program inspired by NIH Image for the Macintosh,<br />

who runs, either as an online applet or as a<br />

downloadable application, on any computer with a<br />

Java 1.5 or later virtual machine. This software was<br />

used to display, edit, analyze, process, save and print<br />

8–bit, 16–bit and 32–bit epifluorescence digital<br />

images, many image formats including TIFF, GIF,<br />

JPEG, BMP, supporting ‘stacks’and hyperstacks, a<br />

series of images that share a single window.<br />

131<br />

For study bacteria and cyanobacteria from our<br />

samples ImageJ was the main software for measure<br />

the length of cells and pixel value statistics of user<strong>de</strong>fined<br />

selections, creating <strong>de</strong>nsity histograms and<br />

line profile plots, supports standard image processing<br />

functions such as contrast manipulation, sharpening,<br />

smoothing, edge <strong>de</strong>tection and median filtering.<br />

Digital images are two-dimensional grids of<br />

pixel intensities values with the width and height of<br />

the image being <strong>de</strong>fined by the number of pixels in x<br />

(rows) and y (columns) direction. Thus, pixels<br />

(picture elements) are the smallest single components<br />

of images, holding numeric values – pixel intensities<br />

– that range between black and white (ImageJ user<br />

gui<strong>de</strong>). Microphotographs used in this study was<br />

RGB images, RGB/HSB stacks, and composite<br />

images.<br />

People can see color with significant variations<br />

and the popular phrase “One picture is worth ten<br />

thousand words” may not apply to certain color<br />

images, especially those that do not follow the basic<br />

principles of Color Universal Design. That why this<br />

combining digital image analysis and automated<br />

analysis methods was usefull to distinguish some<br />

morphological and functional aspects of prokaryotes.<br />

We displied with ImageJ simultaneously several<br />

selections or regions of interest named ROIs, who can<br />

be measured, drawn or filled. Selections was initially<br />

outlined in one of the nine ImageJ <strong>de</strong>fault colors<br />

(Red, Green, Blue, Magenta, Cyan, Yellow, Orange,<br />

Black and White) and then, once created, selections<br />

was contoured or painted with any other color. Most<br />

of ImageJ analyses was printed to the Results table.<br />

Fig 8. The ImageJ Window<br />

(http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/).<br />

Straight Line Selection with “Alt” from<br />

computer keeps the line length fixed while moving<br />

either end of the line and forces the two points that<br />

<strong>de</strong>fine the line to have integer coordinate values when<br />

creating a line on a zoomed image.<br />

The CellC software is the second software used<br />

in automated analysis of our microscopy images like<br />

cell enumeration and measurements of cell’s<br />

properties (size, shape, intensity). We applied the


Utilization of epifluorescence microscopy…/ Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 127-137 (2010)<br />

algorithms of CellC software for digital images,<br />

because this have three important parts: a MATLAB<br />

figure file of the segmented image (this can be<br />

exported in any common image file format; a comma<br />

separated value (CSV) - file with quantitative data of<br />

the cells (was opened in a spreadsheet program Excel<br />

for further analysis); a summary CSV-file with the<br />

cell count for each of the analyzed images for a quick<br />

overview of the analysis process (this file were only<br />

saved in the batch processing mo<strong>de</strong>). Fluorescence<br />

microscopy digital images were analyzed and the<br />

objects has different intensity than the background.<br />

Commonly, this property holds true for images of<br />

bacteria (http://sites.google.com/site/cellcsoftware/).<br />

Fig 9. CellC’s interface<br />

(http://sites.google.com/site/cellcsoftware/) used for<br />

automated digital analysis of bacteria/cyanobacteria.<br />

Furthermore, CellC software were used for two<br />

important purposes: to calculate total object count<br />

(e.g. DAPI stained cells) and co-localization analysis,<br />

comparing total and specific count images of the<br />

same location. When two images were analyzed, the<br />

co-localization was measured by comparing which<br />

cells are present only in the first image, and which are<br />

visible in both of the images. The binarized result<br />

images was saved as JPG-images, and the<br />

enumeration results and statistics are saved as an<br />

Excel-ready CSV file. The images was processed<br />

one at a time, or automatically in a batch.<br />

Graphical illustration of the analysis process<br />

and a part of a CSV-file opened in a spreadsheet<br />

program are given in Figure 9. The CSV-file gives,<br />

for each cell in the image, size and intensity<br />

information as well as information on cell<br />

morphologies. All results produced with digital image<br />

processing algorithms are perfectly reproducible.<br />

The image processing methods used guarantee<br />

that all images are analyzed using the same criteria,<br />

and therefore results between different images are<br />

comparable. CellC software is easy to use due to the<br />

132<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>d graphical user interface, and the batch<br />

processing mo<strong>de</strong> enables fast and convenient<br />

processing of hundreds of cell images.<br />

CellC enumerate bright cells on a dark<br />

background (epifluorescence). We also used two<br />

different methods to process the images: one<br />

image/image pair at a time; several images pairs<br />

sequentially in batch processing mo<strong>de</strong>.<br />

If the background of the image is uneven (because of<br />

e.g. misaligned lighting), it is preferable to choose<br />

this option.<br />

The <strong>de</strong>fault option in CellC is to present the<br />

measured parameters in pixels. By checking this box<br />

we <strong>de</strong>fine how many micrometers one pixel<br />

corresponds to, and receive all measurement results<br />

in micrometers. The correct value of this setting<br />

obviously <strong>de</strong>pends on the imaging setup, such as on<br />

the camera and the objective, and must be <strong>de</strong>termined<br />

outsi<strong>de</strong> CellC, using ImageJ to calibrate the sc<strong>ale</strong>.<br />

The main technical requirement for using CellC<br />

is the clear visual distinction between the cells to be<br />

counted and their background, which could be<br />

achieved relatively easy by epifluorescence<br />

microscopy (Ar<strong>de</strong>lean et al., 2009).<br />

If darker regions exist insi<strong>de</strong> cells, thresholding<br />

may result in false holes insi<strong>de</strong> cells (darker pixels<br />

are consi<strong>de</strong>red background). By selecting this option,<br />

these holes are automatically filled. Sometimes the<br />

fill can cause worse cell cluster separation results.<br />

Automatic removal of over/un<strong>de</strong>rsized cells<br />

were selected, because CellC automatically <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>s<br />

which particles are too small to be consi<strong>de</strong>red as real<br />

cells. All <strong>de</strong>tected objects that are smaller than 1/10<br />

of the mean size of all objects, were removed.<br />

Because the sizes of un<strong>de</strong>r/oversized particles were<br />

known using “Analyze Measure” option of ImageJ, it<br />

was possible to set the thresholds manually by using<br />

the text boxes. The unit of sizes <strong>de</strong>pends on the user<br />

<strong>de</strong>fined unit (pixels/μm 2 ).<br />

The CSV data sheet consists of following<br />

columns: cell's serial number (a unique number given<br />

to each cell); area of cell (estimate of the cell area);<br />

approximate volume (approximation of the volume of<br />

the cell); length (estimate of the cell length); width<br />

(estimate of the cell width); intensity mean, (mean<br />

intensity of the cell); intensity maximum, (maximum<br />

intensity of the cell); solidity (estimate of the shape of<br />

the cell); compactness (estimate of the shape of the


Simona Ghiţă et al. / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 127-137 (2010)<br />

cell). Means of each column and the unit of measure<br />

(pixels or micrometers) are presented in the end of<br />

the file.<br />

Image acquisition—Images for analysis were<br />

done with a Canon digital camera. Brightness and<br />

contrast were adjusted for the first image and kept<br />

unchanged throughout the image acquisition<br />

procedure. The images (1600 by 1200 pixels, 256<br />

dpi) were acquired at 50x magnification and stored as<br />

543-KB JPG files. Additional images acquired at<br />

100x magnification were used to verify that<br />

measurements of individual filaments/ bacteria were<br />

in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt of magnification<br />

a) Acridin-orange stained filamentous<br />

cyanobacteria isolated from mesothermal sulfurous<br />

spring were analysed using Image J software for<br />

distinguish heterocystous cells. First of all, the<br />

original RGB image (Figure 10 A) were transformed<br />

into 32-bit images, then we adjust the<br />

brightness/contrast and also applied smooth or find<br />

edges (Figure 10 B) option from processing images.<br />

The same image were analysed with CellC software<br />

(Fig. 10 C) to count the cells from filamentous<br />

cyanobacteria or to measure the size of each cells.<br />

A B<br />

C<br />

Fig 10. A – digital image of heterocystous<br />

cyanobacteria isolated from sulphurous mesothermal<br />

spring Obanul Mare (Mangalia) stained with AO; B –<br />

find edges of panel A using ImageJ software; C- total<br />

count analysis of panel A using CellC software (48<br />

cells counted from cyanobacteria’s filaments).<br />

Validation of any count were done using<br />

manual count.<br />

ImageJ software were used for<br />

automated measuring cell’s length (µm), using a<br />

133<br />

calibrated eyepiece graticule as reference (Ar<strong>de</strong>lean<br />

et al, 2009).<br />

Digital images from AO staining filaments of<br />

cyanobacteria in microcosm were treated with ImageJ<br />

to distinguish the heterocystous cell.<br />

Fig 11. Cyanobacteria with heterocyst presence in<br />

microcosm 2; AO staining (arrow indicate heterocyst<br />

cell present in samples of microcosm supplemented<br />

with gasoline).<br />

To avoid uncertain estimates of filament length<br />

and width, the number of filaments presented in one<br />

image should not be too high. Extreme filament<br />

<strong>de</strong>nsities would undoubtedly increase filament<br />

overlap and lead to uncertain measurements unless<br />

samples are diluted (Almesjö & Rolff, 2007).<br />

We use a blue light epifluorescence filter set to<br />

visualize AO-stained bacteria (N-400FL type). AO<br />

stains both DNA and RNA so is used for the<br />

enumeration of total bacteria.<br />

In figure 12 A we present only an example of<br />

digital analysis of fig.7 b: first, we adjust<br />

contrast/brightness of digital image, then analyse<br />

measure of graticula presented in fig. 7b and set the<br />

calibration bar to <strong>de</strong>termine correctly the length of<br />

each bacteria treated with nalidixic acid. In B is<br />

presented image analysis using CellC software.<br />

A B<br />

Fig 12. Image analysis program Image J (A) and<br />

CellC (B) from microcosm 2, elongated cells at time<br />

T4 (8hours)<br />

b) DAPI were used to view filamentous<br />

cyanobacteria isolated from mesothermal sulfurous


Utilization of epifluorescence microscopy…/ Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 127-137 (2010)<br />

spring and heterotrophic and phototrophic bacteria<br />

from marine environment.<br />

The fluorochrome DAPI is the most commonly<br />

bacterial stain for a wi<strong>de</strong> range of sample types.<br />

DAPI is a nonintercalating, DNA-specific stain which<br />

fluoresces blue or bluish-white (at or above 390 nm)<br />

when bound to DNA and excited with light at a<br />

wavelength of 365 nm (Kepner & Pratt, 1994). When<br />

unbound, or bound to non-DNA material, it may<br />

fluoresce over a range of yellow colors (see<br />

figure13). DAPI-stained filaments of cyanobacteria<br />

isolated from sulphurous spring Obanul Mare<br />

(Mangalia) reveal heterogeneous cells as can be seen<br />

in Fig.13a.<br />

a<br />

b<br />

Fig 13. DAPI-stained cyanobacteria isolated from<br />

sulphurous spring (a), arrows indicates septa between<br />

cells ; bacteria/cyanobacteria isolated from marine<br />

environment (b); both a and b treated with Image J<br />

and CellC software.<br />

Fig 14 . Cyanobacteria and heterotrophic cells in<br />

microcosm supplemented with gasoline/M2 - DAPI<br />

stain<br />

134<br />

c) Aniline blue is highly specific for staining<br />

type polysacchari<strong>de</strong>. Use of aniline blue is a good<br />

method not only for <strong>de</strong>tection of production of<br />

exocellular β-1,3-glucan, but also for <strong>de</strong>tection of<br />

some β-glucan in the cell wall (Nakanishi et al.,<br />

1976). In figure 15 is apparent the AB stained<br />

heterotrophic cells from microcosm supplemented<br />

with gasoline and cyanobacteria cells from<br />

microcosms and sulphurous spring samples.<br />

a b c<br />

Fig 15 . Visualisation of encapsulated bacteria and<br />

cyanobacteria after aniline-blue staining on M2 (a),<br />

M1 (b) and from sulphurous spring samples (c).<br />

d) PI staining is generally used for the<br />

evaluation of plasma membrane integrity by<br />

fluorescence. Literature mentions that molecular<br />

weighs PI is 668,4 and is thus assumed to be unable<br />

to penetrate cell membrane (Manini & Danovaro,<br />

2006). In figure16 living bacteria appeared green due<br />

to the excitation of the AO dye with which the cells<br />

have been stained and the samples stained with PI<br />

and appear red fluorescent cells; the bacteria were<br />

counted un<strong>de</strong>r blue excitation.<br />

a b<br />

c<br />

Fig 16. Marine bacteria examined using<br />

epifluorescence microscopy (magnification x1000),<br />

Fig (a) illustrate bacteria stained with propidium<br />

iodi<strong>de</strong> (<strong>de</strong>ad cells) in microcosms 1 and (b)<br />

respectively microcosms 2; total count analysis using<br />

the CellC software (c).


Simona Ghiţă et al. / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 127-137 (2010)<br />

e) Natural fluorescence - In figure 17 we<br />

<strong>de</strong>scribe succesfully separatation with ImageJ of cells<br />

by natural fluorescence of photosynthetic gasolinetolerant/oxidant<br />

microorganisms isolated from<br />

mesothermal sulphurous spring in different chanell –<br />

red and green- and then each image were automat<br />

counted with CellC, obtaining finally the number of<br />

cells red and green separately.<br />

Fig 17. Natural fluorescence of (A) photosynthetic<br />

gasoline-tolerant/oxidant microorganisms isolated<br />

from mesothermal sulphurous spring and digital<br />

image analysis of chlorophyll autofluorescence in (B)<br />

green channel ; (C) red channel and (D-E) total count<br />

analysis of red/green channels using the CellC<br />

software.<br />

In figure 18 there are presented images showing<br />

the natural fluorescence of chlorophyll, as an image<br />

of marine oxygenic gasoline tolerant/ oxidant<br />

phototrophic microorganisms. Difference is clearly<br />

apparent width of filaments of cyanobacteria<br />

<strong>de</strong>veloped in the experimental microcosms. The<br />

measurements were performed with Image J program<br />

as shown previous (see point 2).<br />

a b<br />

Fig 18. Autofluorescence of chlorophyll from<br />

oxygenic photosynthetic microorganisms:<br />

microcosms 1 (a) and 2 (b).<br />

Epifluorescence techniques and image analysis<br />

has increasingly been used to <strong>de</strong>termine cell size,<br />

bacterial abundance and <strong>de</strong>tection of physiological<br />

characteristics like damaged versus intact cell<br />

membranes.<br />

135<br />

Throughout the investigations conducted<br />

continuously attempted to <strong>de</strong>termine the nature of<br />

connections between communities of microorganisms<br />

and how and to which condition each.<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

The utilization of epifluorescence microscopy<br />

and digital image analysis enable us to study some<br />

morphological and functional aspects of prokaryotes:<br />

total cell counts (acridine orange, DAPI, SYBR green<br />

1), direct viable count (elongated cell in the presence<br />

of nalidixic acid, labelled with acridine orange),<br />

count of permeabilised cells (cells permeable to<br />

propidium iodi<strong>de</strong>), capsulated cell (labelled with<br />

aniline blue) and chlorophyll containing cells, both<br />

in enriched cultures and in natural / microcosms<br />

samples.<br />

The total number of heterotrophic cells counted<br />

using AO or DAPI is practically the same whereas<br />

total counts obtained with SYBR Green 1 are 47,6%<br />

higher.<br />

The number of <strong>de</strong>ad cells (PI positive) and that<br />

of (putative) capsulated cells are 12.3% and 10%,<br />

respectively of the total number ( AO and DAPI).<br />

The image analysis systems presented here was<br />

performed for counting and estimating the length of<br />

bacteria/cyanobacteria with uniform morphology.<br />

The presented methods does not totally exclu<strong>de</strong><br />

the need for manual microscope analyses of water<br />

samples, and automated procedures must<br />

intermittently be validated by in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt manual<br />

procedures.<br />

Acknowledgment<br />

We are grateful to Dr. Tech. Jyrki Selinummi<br />

(Department of Signal Processing, Tampere<br />

University of Technology, Finland) for very useful<br />

and kind advices concerning the use of software<br />

CellC and ImageJ.<br />

5. References<br />

[1] VAN WAMBEKE F., 1995- Numeration et taille<br />

<strong>de</strong>s bacteries planctoniques au moyen <strong>de</strong><br />

l`analise d`images couplee a l`epifluorescence.<br />

Oceanis, 21: 113-124.


Utilization of epifluorescence microscopy…/ Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 127-137 (2010)<br />

[2] MANINI E. & DANOVARO R., 2006- Synoptic<br />

<strong>de</strong>termination of living/<strong>de</strong>ad and active/dormant<br />

bacterial fraction in marine sediments. FEMS<br />

Microbiol. Ecol, 55: 416-423.<br />

[3] FALCIONI T., PAPA S., GASOL J.M., 2008-<br />

Evaluating the flow-cytometric nucleic acid<br />

double-staining protocol in realistic situations of<br />

planktonic bacterial <strong>de</strong>ath. Appl. Environ.<br />

Microbiol, 74: 1767-1779.<br />

[4] KIRCHMAN D.L., 2008- Microbial Ecology of<br />

the Oceans. John Wiley & Sons, NY, 593.<br />

[5] ARDELEAN I.I., GHIŢĂ S., SARCHIZIAN I.,<br />

2009-Epifluorescent method for quantification<br />

of planktonic marine prokaryotes, Proceedings<br />

of the 2 nd International Symposium “New<br />

Research in Biotechnology” serie F: 288-296.<br />

[6] ISHII T., ADACHI R., OMORI M., SHIMIZU<br />

U., IRIE H., 1987 - The i<strong>de</strong>ntification, counting,<br />

and measurement of phytoplankton by an<br />

image-processing system. J. Cons. Ciem.,<br />

43:253-260.<br />

[7] ESTEP K. W. & MACINTYRE F., 1989 -<br />

Counting, sizing, and i<strong>de</strong>ntification of algae<br />

using image analysis. Sarsia, 74: 261-268.<br />

[8] EMBLETON K. V., GIBSON C. E., HEANEY S.<br />

I., 2003 - Automated counting of phytoplankton<br />

by pattern recognition: a comparison with a<br />

manual counting method. J. Plankt. Res., 25:<br />

669-681.<br />

[9] WALSBY A. E. & AVERY A., 1996 -<br />

Measurement of filamentous cyanobacteria by<br />

image analysis. J. Microbiol. Meth., 26:11-20.<br />

[10] CONGESTRI R., CAPUCCI E., ALBERTANO<br />

P., 2003 – Morphometric variability of the<br />

genus Nodularia (Cyanobacteria) in Baltic<br />

natural communities. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 32:<br />

251-259.<br />

[11] SELINUMMI J., SEPPÄLÄ J., YLI-HARJA O.,<br />

PUHAKKA J.A., 2005 - Software for<br />

quantification of labeled bacteria from digital<br />

microscope images by automated image<br />

analysis”. BioTechniques, 39: 859–863.<br />

[12] SELINUMMI J., 2008- On Algorithms for Two<br />

and Three Dimensional High Throughput Light<br />

Microscopy, Ph.D Thesis for the <strong>de</strong>gree of<br />

Doctor of Technology.<br />

[13] RIPPKA R., DERUELLES J., WATERBURY<br />

J.B,. HERDMAN M., STANIER R.Y., 1979 -<br />

136<br />

Generic assignments, strain histories and<br />

properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria.<br />

Journal of Geneneral Microbiology., 111: 1 -<br />

61.<br />

[14] ITURBE R., FLORES R.M., TORRES L.G.,<br />

2003- Subsoil polluted by hydrocarbons in an<br />

out-of-service oil distribution and storage<br />

station in Zacatecas, Mexico. Environ Geol, 44:<br />

608–620.<br />

[15] MOLINA-BARAHONA L., RODRI´GUEZ-<br />

VA´ZQUEZ R., HERNA´NDEZ- VELA´SCO,<br />

C. VEGA-JARQUIN, O. ZAPATA-PE´REZ<br />

M., MENDOZA- CANTU´ A., ALBORES A.,<br />

2004- Diesel removal from contaminated soils<br />

by biostimulation and supplementation with<br />

crop residues, Appl Soil Ecol, 27: 165–175.<br />

[16] LUNA G.M., MANINI E., DANOVARO R.,<br />

2002- High fraction of <strong>de</strong>ad and inactive<br />

bacteria in coastal marine sediments:<br />

comparison of protocols and ecological<br />

significance. Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 68:<br />

3509-3513.<br />

[17] LUNAU M., LEMKE A., WALTHER K.,<br />

MARTENS-HABBENA W., SIMON M., 2005-<br />

An improved method for counting bacteria from<br />

sediments and turbid environments by<br />

epifluorescence microscopy. Appl. Environ.<br />

Microbiol, 7: 961-968.<br />

[18] HONG Z., DELAUNEY A.J., VERMA D.P.S.,<br />

2001-A cell plate-specific callose<br />

synthase and its interaction with<br />

phragmoplastin.Plant Cell, 13:755-768<br />

[19] NAKANISHI I., KAZUTSUGU K., SUZUKI<br />

T., ISHIKAWA M., BANNO I., SAKANE T.,<br />

HARADA T.,1976- Demonstration of curdlantype<br />

polysacchari<strong>de</strong> and some other β-1, 3-<br />

glucan in microorganisms with aniline blue.<br />

J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol., 22: 1-11.<br />

[20] MC INTOSH M., STONE B. A.,. STANISICH<br />

V. A,, 2005-Curdlan and other bacterial (1-3)-β-<br />

D-glucans. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 68: 163-<br />

173.<br />

[21] HEISSENBERGER A., LEPPARD G.G.,<br />

HERNDL G.J., 1996 - Relationship between the<br />

intracellular integrity and the morphology of the<br />

capsular envelope in attached and free-living<br />

marine bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 62:<br />

4521-4528.


Simona Ghiţă et al. / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 127-137 (2010)<br />

[22] STODEREGGER K.E. & HERNDL G.J., 2002 -<br />

Distribution of capsulated bacterioplankton in<br />

the North Atlantic and North Sea. Microb.<br />

Ecol., 44: 154-163.<br />

[23] SHERR B., SHERR E.B., DEL GIORGIO P.,<br />

2001- Enumeration of total and highly active<br />

bacteria. Methods in Microbiology, 30: 129-<br />

161.<br />

[24] KOGURE K., SIMIDU U., TAGA N., 1979- A<br />

tentative direct microscopic method for<br />

counting living marine bacteria.<br />

Can.J.Microbiol, 25:415-420.<br />

[25] WEINBAUER M.G., BECKMANN C., HOFLE<br />

M.G., 1998 – Utility of green fluorescent<br />

nucleic acid dyes and aluminium oxi<strong>de</strong><br />

membrane filters for rapid epifluorescence<br />

enumeration of soil and sediment bacteria. Appl.<br />

Environ Microbiol, 64: 5000-5003.<br />

[26] http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/<br />

[27] http://sites.google.com/site/cellcsoftware/<br />

[28] ALMESJÖ L. & ROLFF C., 2007 - Automated<br />

measurements of filamentous cyanobacteria by<br />

digital image analysis. Limnol.Oceanogr.<br />

Methods, 5: 217-224.<br />

[29] KEPNER R.L. & PRATT J.R., 1994- Use of<br />

fluorochromes for direct enumeration of total<br />

bacteria in environmental samples: past and<br />

present. Microbiological, 58: 603-615.<br />

137


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

CHANGES IN BACTERIAL ABUNDANCE AND BIOMASS IN SANDY SEDIMENT<br />

MICROCOSMS SUPPLEMENTED WITH GASOLINE<br />

Dan Răzvan POPOVICIU 1 , Ioan ARDELEAN 1,2<br />

1 Ovidius University of Constanţa,Natural Sciences and Agricultural Sciences Faculty, Mamaia Avenue, no. 124,<br />

Constanţa, 900527, Romania, e-mail: dr_popoviciu@yahoo.com<br />

2 Biology Institute of Bucharest, Splaiul In<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nţei, no. 296, 060031 Bucureşti, Romania,<br />

email:ioan.ar<strong>de</strong>lean57@yahoo.com<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: Bacterial abundance, biomass and morphological diversity were studied in three marine sediment<br />

microcosms: control, sediment supplemented with gasoline, and sediment supplemented with gasoline and<br />

ammonium nitrate. Microbial <strong>de</strong>nsity (4.7-6.65 × 10 6 cells/cm 3 sediment in uncontaminated samples) and<br />

biomass (1.72-3.13 µg/cm 3 sediment) dropped significantly after gasoline addition. Ammonium nitrate favoured<br />

a faster recovery to initial values. Gasoline contamination also modified the proportion of bacterial morphotypes,<br />

increasing the percentage of rod-shaped cells.<br />

Keywords: Bacteria, microcosms, hydrocarbons, abundance, biomass, morphotypes, sandy sediments.<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Hydrocarbon contamination is one of the most<br />

frequent and most dangerous forms of pollution<br />

affecting marine environments. Studying its effects on<br />

prokaryote communities is important, both<br />

theoretically and practically, opening the way to<br />

bioremediation.<br />

From a microbiological point of view, sediments<br />

and not the water column are the richest marine<br />

environment. Both sandy and muddy sediments show<br />

significant amounts of prokaryotes, playing a key role<br />

in the <strong>de</strong>composition of organic matter and nutrient<br />

recycling..<br />

Abundance, biomass and composition of<br />

sediment bacterial communities can be <strong>de</strong>termined by<br />

many factors, such as the granulometric<br />

characteristics of the sediment, water dynamism,<br />

oxygenation, protozoan grazing etc [1, 2, 3].<br />

Even though they cover a large part of the marine<br />

littoral enviroment, coastal sands are the less studied<br />

[1].<br />

In or<strong>de</strong>r to evaluate the response of<br />

bacteriobenthos to various environmental changes,<br />

microcosms represent extremely valuable tools [4, 5].<br />

The objective of the present study was to<br />

<strong>de</strong>termine the effects of hydrocarbon addition on the<br />

abundance, biomass and morphological diversity of<br />

bacteria in marine sandy sediment microcosms.<br />

2. Material and Methods<br />

Microcosms. Sandy sediment was collected<br />

from the mediolittoral of a sandy beach in Constanţa,<br />

relatively close to the central headquarters of the<br />

“Ovidius” University, and wet sieved through a 2 mm<br />

sieve (in or<strong>de</strong>r to eliminate large particles and<br />

macrofauna) [6]. Three 1.4 L transparent plastic<br />

recipients were filled each with around 500 cm 3 of<br />

sand, covered by a 200 mL sea water column. All the<br />

microcosms were covered with transparent caps and<br />

stored at constant temperature (18°C) with<br />

illumination simulating the day-night cycle.<br />

The control microcosm was labeled “A”.<br />

Microcosm B was supplemented with 95 gasoline<br />

(1% final concentration). Microcosm C was<br />

supplemented with the same amount of gasoline, plus<br />

ammonium nitrate as a nutrient (0.005% final<br />

concentration).<br />

Sampling and fixation. Five samples consisting<br />

of sediment cores were collected from each<br />

microcosm at time intervals of 14 days. The first<br />

series of cores was taken just before the addition of<br />

gasoline and nutrient.<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


Changes in bacterial abundance and biomass... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 139-145 (2010)<br />

Sample collection was done using improvised<br />

piston corers (20 mL syringes with the forepart<br />

<strong>de</strong>tached, but with the gradation intact). From each<br />

sample, the surficial 5 cm 3 (corresponding to a <strong>de</strong>pth<br />

of 17.5 mm) was taken for analysis.<br />

Each sample was suspen<strong>de</strong>d in 5 ml of buffered<br />

formaline (4% final concentration) [7, 8, 9, 10]. The<br />

formal<strong>de</strong>hy<strong>de</strong> solution acts as a fixative, killing the<br />

microorganisms and preventing contamination and<br />

cell <strong>de</strong>formation. The labeled tubes containing the<br />

subsamples were preserved by refrigeration at +4°C.<br />

Cell separation. Dislodgement of bacteria<br />

attached to sand grains is an important step prior to<br />

analysis. The procedure used was adapted, with some<br />

modifications, from existing literature [11, 12, 13, 14,<br />

15].<br />

Sediment suspensions were diluted 5-fold,<br />

incubated with Tween 80 (1 mg/mL final<br />

concentration) for 15 minutes and vortexed at 2 400<br />

r.p.m. for 5 minutes.<br />

Direct counting of bacteria. Microorganisms<br />

were visualised by epifluorescence microscopy, using<br />

3,6-dimethylaminoacridinic chlori<strong>de</strong> (acridine<br />

orange) as a fluorochrome. This compound becomes<br />

highly fluorescent by binding to the nucleic acids,<br />

giving an orange-red fluorescence for single-stran<strong>de</strong>d<br />

nucleic acids (mostly RNA) and a green one for<br />

double-stran<strong>de</strong>d acids (DNA) [16]. Acridine orange<br />

stains both living and <strong>de</strong>ad cells [17, 18].<br />

The technique employed was an adapted and<br />

simplified version of the protocols used by other<br />

authors [3, 8, 10, 11, 19, 20]. 1 ml was collected from<br />

each suspension and incubated for 5 minutes with 1<br />

ml acridine orange (5 µg/mL final concentration).<br />

The resulting solution was filtered through a 0.45 µm<br />

Millipore filtering membrane, using a syringe and a<br />

Millipore hol<strong>de</strong>r. Filtered membranes were<br />

previously stained with Sudan Black, in or<strong>de</strong>r to<br />

reduce background fluorescence.<br />

Each filter was washed with 50-60 ml of distilled<br />

water, placed on a glass sli<strong>de</strong> and examined using a<br />

Hund Wetzlar H 600 AFL 50 microscope, at an<br />

500× enlargement. An eyepiece grid micrometer was<br />

employed.<br />

For each filter, 15-20 grids were randomly<br />

chosen (from different areas of the membrane, except<br />

for its margins), photographed with a digital camera<br />

and visualised with MBF ImageJ for Microscopy<br />

140<br />

software (http://www.macbiophotonics.ca/downloads.<br />

htm.) [21].<br />

Fluorescent cells in each grid were counted<br />

manually. Fluorescent anorganic particles and<br />

obviously eukaryotic structures (by size and<br />

morphology) were exclu<strong>de</strong>d. In case sediment<br />

particles masked bacterial cells, any bacteria found<br />

on the surface of such particles were counted twice<br />

[7, 8, 17, 22]. The mean bacterial <strong>de</strong>nsity was<br />

calculated for each sample according to the following<br />

formula:<br />

N = n ×Af / Ag × V / v<br />

where:<br />

N = mean bacterial number per cm 3 of<br />

sediment;<br />

n = mean bacterial number per grid for each<br />

subsample;<br />

Ag = grid area;<br />

Af = filter area;<br />

v = volume of the filtered sediment<br />

suspension;<br />

V = volume of the total sediment suspension<br />

containing 1 cm 3 of sediment.<br />

Bacterial biomass estimation. All the<br />

microorganisms observed were classified into three<br />

morphological categories: cocci, bacilli (including<br />

coccobacilli and vibrios) and filamentous bacteria<br />

(those having a length more than five times greater<br />

than the width) [3]. Cell dimensions (diameter,<br />

respectively length and width) were measured using<br />

the grid micrometer.<br />

Biovolume was <strong>de</strong>termined for each cell<br />

according to the formula [8, 16]:<br />

V = (π/ 4) d 2 (l – d / 3)<br />

where:<br />

l = cell length;<br />

d = cell width/diameter.<br />

For cocci, the formula becomes:<br />

V = πd 3 / 6<br />

To <strong>de</strong>termine dry biomass based on the<br />

biovolume, several authors proposed different<br />

conversion factors. In the present study, the following<br />

formula was used [23]:<br />

md = 435 × V 0,86<br />

where:<br />

md = dry biomass (fg);


Dan Răzvan Popoviciu, Ioan Ar<strong>de</strong>lean / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 139-145 (2010)<br />

V = cell volume (µm 3 ).<br />

Dry biomass was <strong>de</strong>termined for each cell,<br />

calculating then the media for each sample. Total<br />

(wet) biomass can be approximated using a<br />

conventional mean value for bacterial cell <strong>de</strong>nsity, of<br />

1.1 g/cm 3 [23, 24].<br />

3. Results and Discussions<br />

Bacterial cell abundance. The evolution of cell<br />

<strong>de</strong>nsity in time (from 0 to 56 days) for each<br />

microcosm is shown in Fig. 1.<br />

Million cells<br />

7<br />

6.5<br />

6<br />

5.5<br />

5<br />

4.5<br />

4<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

0 14 28 42 56<br />

Time (days)<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

Fig. 1. Number of bacterial cells (× 10 6 ) per cm 3<br />

of sediment.<br />

For undisturbed sediment cores, bacterial <strong>de</strong>nsity<br />

ranged between 4.7-6.65 × 10 6 cells/cm 3 sediment<br />

with an average of 5.52 × 10 6 cells/cm 3 .<br />

These values are within the variation limits of<br />

littoral sediment microbial <strong>de</strong>nsity (although data<br />

found in literature is distributed over a wi<strong>de</strong> range).<br />

For comparison, here are some bacterial <strong>de</strong>nsities: 10 9<br />

cells/g dry sand [20], 5 × 10 8 -1.5 × 10 9 cells/g<br />

sediment [9] and 7-9 × 10 7 cells/g [25] on the U.S.A.<br />

East Coast, 1.91-7.32 × 10 7 cells/g dry sediment, in<br />

Eastern Canada, at the waterline [1], 3.6 × 10 8 cells/g<br />

dry sediment, in Florida [26], 6.8-20.3 × 10 8<br />

141<br />

cells/cm 3 , fine sands in a Mexican tropical lagoon, 1.2<br />

m <strong>de</strong>pth [27], 7 × 10 8 -6.7 × 10 9 cells/cm 3 , Baltic Sea<br />

[28], over 5.12 × 10 8 cells/g dry sediment, Western<br />

Mediterranean Sea [29], 1.5 × 10 8 cells/g dry sand<br />

[10], 6-8 × 10 9 cells/g sediment [30] and 3.54-8.08 ×<br />

10 9 cells/g [3] in the Adriatic Sea, at several meters<br />

<strong>de</strong>pth, 0.2-1 × 10 9 cells/g dry sediment, in littoral<br />

sands in the Gulf of Tokyo [14], 2.56-4.46 × 10 6<br />

cells/g, at 2 m <strong>de</strong>pth, in North Sea [31].<br />

The addition of gasoline caused a <strong>de</strong>crease in cell<br />

abundance to values as low as 3.6 × 10 6 cells/cm 3 . A<br />

return to <strong>de</strong>nsities similar to the initial ones was<br />

observed in the last samples. The recovery was faster<br />

in the microcosm supplemented with ammonium<br />

nitrate (28 days).<br />

Direct cuantification of bacteria through<br />

epifluorescence microscopy has some limitations.<br />

Cell masking by sediment particles, background<br />

fluorescence, lack of an efficient method to<br />

distinguish prokaryotes from eukaryotes, the poor<br />

quality of some photographs etc., can cause<br />

overestimation or un<strong>de</strong>restimation of real abundance<br />

[8, 17, 22]. The method used for bacterial dispersion<br />

from sediment grains can also influence the results<br />

[9].<br />

An important factor that can cause<br />

un<strong>de</strong>restimation of bacterial abundance is the<br />

extremely small size of some microorganisms. Many<br />

bacteria have diameters below 0.3 microns, and can<br />

be very difficult or even impossible to visualise,<br />

<strong>de</strong>pending on the optical means employed. Some of<br />

them can even pass through usual filtering<br />

membranes. According to some authors such<br />

ultramicrobacteria constitute up to 72% of the soil<br />

microbiota, and it seems that they have similar<br />

proportions in marine environments [17]. In<br />

conclusion, all data obtained using direct counts<br />

should be regar<strong>de</strong>d as relative.<br />

It should be noted that not all the bacteria<br />

ennumerated with acridine orange are alive. Living<br />

bacteria constitute usually less than one third, rarely<br />

reaching 60% of the total number. The rest are <strong>de</strong>ad<br />

cells, or even cell fragments [10, 32].


Changes in bacterial abundance and biomass... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 139-145 (2010)<br />

Biomass (µg)<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0 14 28 42 56<br />

Time (days)<br />

Fig. 2. Bacterial dry biomass (µg/cm 3 ).<br />

Bacterial biomass<br />

Biomass showed large variations, from 1.36 to<br />

3.13 µg/cm 3 sediment (equiv<strong>ale</strong>nt to 4.3 to 11.4 µg<br />

total biomass/cm 3 ). On average, the highest biomass<br />

was <strong>de</strong>termined for the undisturbed sediment (an<br />

average of 2.27 µg/cm 3 ). The addition of gasoline was<br />

followed by a <strong>de</strong>crease in microcosms B and C. The<br />

average value for contaminated sediment in<br />

microcosm B was only 1.7 µg/cm 3 , while in C, it was<br />

higher (2.12 µg/cm 3 ), showing a faster recovery.<br />

The importance of nitrogenous nutrients in the<br />

recovery of natural microbiota after hydrocarbon<br />

pollution is consistent with data in existing literature<br />

[33, 34].<br />

The exact <strong>de</strong>termination of bacterial biomass can<br />

be affected by various technical and mathematical<br />

factors. Different fluorochromes can give different<br />

results [16]. The selected biovolume to biomass<br />

conversion factor influences the final results. Also, it<br />

was <strong>de</strong>monstrated that coastal marine sediments<br />

contain significant numbers of disk-shaped bacteria<br />

and counting them as cocci would overestimate their<br />

volume [35].<br />

Proportion of major bacterial morphotypes.<br />

As specified above, bacteria were classified into three<br />

groups: cocci, rods and filamentous. Their proportion<br />

in the total abundance, for each microcosm and<br />

collection time is shown in Fig. 3 (a,b,c).<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

142<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

Microcosm A<br />

0 14 28 42 56<br />

Time (days)<br />

Microcosm B<br />

0 14 28 42 56<br />

Time (days)<br />

Microcosm C<br />

0 14 28 42 56<br />

Time (days)<br />

Filamentous<br />

Rods<br />

Cocci<br />

Filamentous<br />

Rods<br />

Cocci<br />

Filamentous<br />

Rods<br />

Cocci<br />

Fig.3 (a,b,c). Percentage of major bacterial<br />

morphotypes


Dan Răzvan Popoviciu, Ioan Ar<strong>de</strong>lean / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 139-145 (2010)<br />

Most of the bacterial cells (72-92%) observed<br />

were spherical (in accordance to data obtained in<br />

a)<br />

a)<br />

b)<br />

c)<br />

Fig. 4. Main bacterial morphotypes: a) cocci; b)<br />

rods; c) filamentous (bar = 10 µm)<br />

143<br />

marine sediments by Šestanović et al. [3] and<br />

Popoviciu [36]).<br />

The proportion of rod-shaped bacteria (including<br />

coccobacilli and vibrios) was different among the<br />

three microcosms. In undisturbed sediment, their<br />

percentage was generally below 15% (note: in<br />

microcosm A, at T3, the high percentage was due to a<br />

single large colony of small rods), with an average of<br />

13.9%. In gasoline contaminated sediment, rodshaped<br />

bacteria constituted a larger part of the<br />

microbiota, with an average of 23.4%. The<br />

proportion of filamentous bacteria was insignificant.<br />

Bacterial assemblages were rare, in concordance<br />

to the observations ma<strong>de</strong> by Novitsky & MacSween<br />

[1].<br />

It should be noted that classification of small<br />

bacteria (cells with diameters below 0.6 microns<br />

formed the majority) into morphotypes is prone to<br />

errors. This is due to the fluorescent halo that appears<br />

around cells, causing very small sized bacilli or<br />

vibrios to be counted as cocci [19].<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

Hydrocarbon contamination affects marine<br />

sediment microbiota in terms of abundance, biomass<br />

and composition.<br />

Addition of nitrogenous nutrients (ammonium<br />

nitrate) favours a faster recovery to initial parameters.<br />

Epifluorescence microscopy is a useful tool for<br />

evaluating the reaction of sediment bacteria to<br />

environmental changes. In perspective, use of<br />

differential fluorochromes and correlation to<br />

cultivation techniques are to be employed in such<br />

studies.<br />

5. References<br />

[1] NOVITSKY, J.A., MACSWEEN, M.C., 1989 –<br />

Microbiology of a high energy beach sediment:<br />

evi<strong>de</strong>nce for an active and growing community.<br />

Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 52: 71-75.<br />

[2] BRUNE, A., FRENZEL, P., CYPIONKA, H.,<br />

2000 – Life at the oxic-anoxic interface:<br />

microbial activities and adaptations. FEMS<br />

Microbiol. Rev. 24: 691-710.


Changes in bacterial abundance and biomass... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 139-145 (2010)<br />

[3] ŠESTANOVIĆ, S., SOLIĆ, M.,<br />

KRUSTULOVIĆ, N., BOGNER, D., 2005 –<br />

Volume, abundance and biomass of sediment<br />

bacteria in the eastern mid Adriatic Sea. Acta<br />

Adriat. 46: 177-191.<br />

[4] RÖLING, W.F.M., MILNER, M.G., JONES,<br />

D.M., LEE, K., DANIEL, F., SWANNELL,<br />

R.J.P., HEAD, I.M., 2002 – Robust<br />

hydrocarbon <strong>de</strong>gradation and dynamics of<br />

bacterial communities during nutrient-enhanced<br />

oil spill bioremediation. Appl. Environ.<br />

Microbiol. 68: p. 5537-5548.<br />

[5] MIRALLES, G., NÉRINI, D., MANTÉ, C.,<br />

ACQUAVIVA, M., DOUMENQ, P.,<br />

MICHOTEY, V., NAZARET, S., BERTRAND,<br />

J.C., CUNY, P., 2007 – Effects of spilled oil on<br />

bacterial communities of Mediterranean coastal<br />

anoxic sediments chronically subjected to oil<br />

hydrocarbon contamination. Microb. Ecol. 54:<br />

646-661.<br />

[6] FISH, K.M., PRINCIPE, J.M. 1994 –<br />

Biotransformations of Aroclor 1242 in Hudson<br />

River test tube microcosms. Appl. Environ.<br />

Microbiol. 60: 4289-4296.<br />

[7] SCHALLENBERG, M., KALFF, J.,<br />

RASMUSSEN, J.B., 1989 – Solutions to<br />

problems in enumerating sediment bacteria by<br />

direct counts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55:<br />

1214-1219.<br />

[8] FRY, J.C., 1990 – Direct methods and biomass<br />

estimation. Meth. Microbiol. 22: 41-85.<br />

[9] EPSTEIN, S.S., ALEXANDER, D., COSMAN,<br />

K., DOMPÉ, A., GALLAGHER, S.,<br />

JARSOBSKI, J., LANING, E., MARTINEZ,<br />

R., PANASIK, G., PELUSO, C., RUNDE, R.,<br />

TIMMER, E., 1997 – Enumeration of sandy<br />

sediment bacteria: Are the counts quantitative or<br />

relative? Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 151: 11-16.<br />

[10] LUNA, G.M., MANINI, E., DANOVARO, R.,<br />

2002 – Large fraction of <strong>de</strong>ad and inactive<br />

bacteria in coastal marine sediments:<br />

comparison of protocols for <strong>de</strong>termination and<br />

ecological significance. Appl. Environ.<br />

Microbiol. 68: 3509-3513.<br />

[11] FALLON, R.D., NEWELL, S.Y.,<br />

HOPKINSON, C.S., 1983 – Bacterial<br />

production in marine sediments: will cell-<br />

144<br />

specific measures agree with whole-system<br />

metabolism? Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 11: 119-127.<br />

[12] ELLERY, W.N., SCHLEYER, M.H., 1984 –<br />

Comparison of homogenization and<br />

ultrasonication as techniques in extracting<br />

attached sedimentary bacteria. Mar. Ecol. Prog.<br />

Ser. 15: 247-250.<br />

[13] EPSTEIN, S.S., ROSSEL, J., 1995 –<br />

Enumeration of sandy sediment bacteria: search<br />

for optimal protocol. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser 117:<br />

289-298.<br />

[14] KUWAE, T., HOSOKAWA, Y., 1999 –<br />

Determination of abundance and biovolume of<br />

bacteria in sediments by dual staining with 4’,6diamidino-2-phenylindole<br />

and acridine orange:<br />

relationship to dispersion treatment and<br />

sediment characteristics. Appl. Environ.<br />

Microbiol. 65: 3407-3412.<br />

[15] BENNETT, P.C., ENGEL, A.S., ROBERTS,<br />

J.A., 2006 – Counting and imaging bacteria on<br />

mineral surfaces. in Patricia, J., Maurice, A.,<br />

Warren, L.A. (eds.). Methods of Investigating<br />

Microbial-Mineral Interactions. CMS Workshop<br />

Lectures, Vol. 14: 37-78, The Clay Mineral<br />

Society, Chantilly.<br />

[16] SHERR, B., SHERR, E., DEL GIORGIO, P.,<br />

2001 – Enumeration of total and highly active<br />

bacteria. Meth. Microbiol. 30: 129-159.<br />

[17] KEPNER, R.L., PRATT, J.R., 1994 – Use of<br />

fluorochromes for direct enumeration of total<br />

bacteria in environmental samples: past and<br />

present. Microbiol. Rev. 58: 603-615.<br />

[18] MCFETERS, G.A., YU, F.P., PYLE, B.H.,<br />

STEWART, P.S., 1995 – Physiological<br />

assessment of bacteria using fluorochromes. J.<br />

Microbiol. Meth. 21: 1-13.<br />

[19] WATSON, S.W., NOVITSKY, T.J., QUINBY,<br />

H.L., VALOIS, F.W., 1977 – Determination of<br />

bacterial number and biomass in the marine<br />

environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 33:<br />

940-946.<br />

[20] MONTAGNA, P.A., 1982 – Sampling <strong>de</strong>sign<br />

and enumeration statistics for bacteria extracted<br />

from marine sediments. Appl. Environ.<br />

Microbiol. 43: 1366-1372.<br />

[21] COLLINS, T.J., 2007 – ImageJ for microscopy.<br />

BioTechniques 43: 25-30.


Dan Răzvan Popoviciu, Ioan Ar<strong>de</strong>lean / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 139-145 (2010)<br />

[22] GOUGH, H.L., STAHL, D.A., 2003 –<br />

Optimization of direct cell counting in sediment.<br />

J. Microbiol. Meth. 52: 39-46.<br />

[23] LOFERER-KRÖßBACHER, M., KLIMA, J.,<br />

PSENNER, R., 1998 – Determination of<br />

bacterial cell dry mass by transmission electron<br />

microscopy and <strong>de</strong>nsitometric image analysis.<br />

Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64: 688-694.<br />

[24] BAKKEN, L.R., OLSEN, R.A., 1983 – Buoyant<br />

<strong>de</strong>nsities and dry-matter contents of<br />

microorganisms: conversion of a measured<br />

biovolume into biomass. Appl. Environ.<br />

Microbiol. 45: 1188-1195.<br />

[25] HYMEL, S.N., PLANTE, C.J., 1998 –<br />

Improved method of bacterial enumeration in<br />

sandy and <strong>de</strong>posit-fee<strong>de</strong>r gut sediments using<br />

the fluorescent stain 4,6-diamidino-2phenylindole<br />

(DAPI). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.<br />

173: 299-304.<br />

[26] PROCTOR, L.M., SOUZA, A.C., 2001 –<br />

Method for enumeration of 5-cyano-3,2-ditoyl<br />

tetrazolium chlori<strong>de</strong> (CTC)- active cells and<br />

cell-specific CTC activity of benthic bacteria in<br />

riverine, estuarine and coastal sediments. J.<br />

Microbiol. Meth. 43: 213-222.<br />

[27] FERRARA-GUERRERO, M.J.,<br />

CASTELLANOS-PAÉZ, M.E., GARZA-<br />

MOURIÑO, G., 2007 – Variation of a benthic<br />

heterotrophic bacteria community with different<br />

respiratory metabolisms in Coyuca <strong>de</strong> Benitez<br />

coastal lagoon (Guerrero, Mexico). Rev. Biol.<br />

Trop. (Int. J. Trop. Biol.) 55: 157-169.<br />

[28] DIETRICH, D., ARNDT, H., 2000 – Biomass<br />

partitioning of benthic microbes in a Baltic<br />

inlet: relationships between bacteria, algae,<br />

heterotrophic flagellates and ciliates. Mar. Biol.<br />

136: 309-322.<br />

[29] DANOVARO, R., FABIANO, M., BOYER,<br />

M., 1994 – Seasonal changes of benthic bacteria<br />

in a seagrass bed (Posidonia oceanica) of the<br />

Ligurian Sea in relation to origin, composition<br />

and fate of the sediment organic matter. Mar.<br />

Biol. 119: 489-500.<br />

[30] PUSCEDDU, A., FIORDELMONDO, C.,<br />

DANOVARO, R., 2005 – Sediment<br />

resuspension effects on the benthic microbial<br />

loop in experimental microcosms. Microb. Ecol.<br />

50: 602-613.<br />

145<br />

[31] LUNAU, M., LEMKE, A., WALTHER, K.,<br />

2005 – An improved method for counting<br />

bacteria from sediments and turbid<br />

environments by epifluorescence microscopy.<br />

Environ. Microbiol. 7: 961-968.<br />

[32] ZWEIFEL, U.L., HAGSTRÖM, Å., 1995 –<br />

Total counts of marine bacteria inclu<strong>de</strong> a large<br />

fraction of non-nucleoid-containing bacteria<br />

(ghosts). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61: 2180-<br />

2185.<br />

[33] HIGASHIHARA, T., SATO, A., SIMIDU, U.,<br />

1978 – An MPN method for the enumeration of<br />

marine hydrocarbon <strong>de</strong>grading bacteria. Bull.<br />

Japan. Soc. Sci. Fish. 44: 1127-1134.<br />

[34] HAZEN, T.C., 2010 – Biostimulation, in<br />

Timmis, K.N. (ed.). Handbook of Hydrocarbon<br />

and Lipid Microbiology, 4517-4530, Springer-<br />

Verlag Berlin Hei<strong>de</strong>lberg.<br />

[35] MUDRYK, Z.J., PODGÓRSKA, B., 2006 –<br />

Scanning electron microscopy investigation of<br />

bacterial colonization of marine beach sand<br />

grains. Baltic Coastal Zone 10: 61-72.<br />

[36] POPOVICIU, D.R., 2009 – Aspecte cantitative<br />

<strong>şi</strong> morfo-structur<strong>ale</strong> <strong>ale</strong> microbiotei din<br />

sedimente marine nisipoase <strong>de</strong> la litoralul<br />

românesc al Mării Negre. Master’s thesis,<br />

Ovidius University of Constanţa, Faculty of<br />

Natural Sciences and Agricultural Sciences.


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

THE FORMATION OF BACTERIAL BIOFILMS ON THE HYDROPHILE<br />

SURFACE OF GLASS IN LABORATORY STATIC CONDITIONS: THE EFFECT<br />

OF TEMPERATURE AND SALINITY<br />

Aurelia Manuela MOLDOVEANU *, Ioan I. ARDELEAN **<br />

* Ovidius” University Constanta, 1Universitatii Alley, Building B, 900527 Constanta, Romania,<br />

aurelia.moldoveanu@yahoo.com<br />

** Biology Institute of Bucharest, 296 Splaiul In<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nţei, 060031 Bucharest, Romania,<br />

ioan.ar<strong>de</strong>lean57@yahoo.com<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: In the case of temperature variation, at 18ºC there is an increase of the cellular <strong>de</strong>nsity from<br />

12∙10 2 cel/mm 2 to 62∙10 2 cel/mm 2 , while at 6 ºC cellular <strong>de</strong>nsity increases from 5∙10 2 cel/mm 2 to 55∙10 2<br />

cel/mm 2 . The results obtained show that cellular <strong>de</strong>nsity in the case of biofilms formed at 6 ºC is lower<br />

compared to cellular <strong>de</strong>nsity of biofilms formed at 18 ºC. Salinity modification from 15g/l to 10g/l<br />

<strong>de</strong>termined an increase of cellular <strong>de</strong>nsity from 4∙10 2 cel/mm 2 to 54∙10 2 cel/mm 2 , while the modifications<br />

of the osmotic conditions in the marine environment due to salinity <strong>de</strong>crease to 5g/l led to an increase of<br />

the cellular <strong>de</strong>nsity from 2∙10 2 cel/mm 2 to 49∙10 2 cel/mm 2 . The variation of temperature and salinity of<br />

seawater in “in vitro” conditions influenced the process of bacterial adherence and formation of the initial<br />

layers of the biofilms by the modification of the <strong>de</strong>nsity of the adherent cells.<br />

Keywords: quorum sensing, exopolysacchari<strong>de</strong>s, matrix, microecosystem, microfouling.<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Biofilms are complex structures ma<strong>de</strong> up of<br />

cells and exopolysacchari<strong>de</strong>s which form at the level<br />

of interfaces and which are intensely studied because<br />

of their fundamental importance and applicability in<br />

the environmental domain, biotechnology and<br />

medicine [1,2,3,4,5].<br />

Marine bacteria form biofilms in “in situ”<br />

conditions, un<strong>de</strong>r the influence of various<br />

environmental factors. Hydrostatic pressure, solar<br />

radiation, temperature, salinity, pH, oxidation<br />

potential and nutrients existing on the surfaces are<br />

physic-chemical factors that influence the activity of<br />

microorganisms, but their role on the marine bacterial<br />

populations is still being studied [6,7,5]. Among<br />

these factors, temperature and salinity have major<br />

importance for all living organisms, especially for<br />

those in the marine environment, where<br />

microorganisms are subjected to extremely wi<strong>de</strong><br />

variations which allowed them to survive from the<br />

beginning of life on Earth. They are the only<br />

organisms that can adapt to extreme environments<br />

[8,9,10].<br />

In laboratory conditions, the variation of<br />

environmental factors is essential in the formation of<br />

biofilms. It is important to know which factor has the<br />

most influence on the adherent bacterial cells. Thus,<br />

the growth and multiplication of microorganisms is<br />

the result of a number of coordinated metabolic<br />

reactions whose normal <strong>de</strong>velopment is ensured by an<br />

optimal temperature [11,12,13].<br />

The marine bacteria in the structure of biofilms<br />

react to temperature and modify their bacterial<br />

metabolism and the mechanism for the regulation of<br />

genes <strong>de</strong>pending on how this factor varies, most<br />

species being studied between their optimal<br />

temperature limits due to the mesophile character<br />

[14]. Thus, an increase by 10 ºC of the initial<br />

temperature <strong>de</strong>termines an increase of the speed of<br />

the chemical reactions and gene regulation<br />

mechanism. Consequently, the speed of the enzymatic<br />

processes increases progressively as the temperature<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


The formation of bacterial biofilms... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 147-156 (2010)<br />

rises until it reaches the optimum level and then the<br />

speed <strong>de</strong>creases progressively [15].<br />

The natural environments offer microorganisms<br />

different conditions of salinity, from very low<br />

concentrations (rivers and lakes) to the very high<br />

concentrations of salty lakes and seas, or even to<br />

those that represent true saturated solutions. Thus,<br />

salinity becomes a variable factor in the marine<br />

environment which is important for the<br />

microorganisms within the biofilms as they are<br />

influenced by it according to the <strong>de</strong>gree of tolerance<br />

to the concentration of NaCl and the mechanism for<br />

the regulation of the available ions [16]. The study of<br />

the effect of temperature and salinity on the temporal<br />

dynamics of bacterial cell <strong>de</strong>nsity on the hydrophile<br />

surface of glass in laboratory static conditions leads<br />

to personal data regarding the initial stages of biofilm<br />

formation.<br />

2. Material and Methods<br />

In our experiments, we used two static methods<br />

in or<strong>de</strong>r to <strong>de</strong>termine the environmental factors with<br />

role in biofilm formation: the Henrici method<br />

[17,18,19], wi<strong>de</strong>ly employed in the study of<br />

adherence and the microbial fishing method [20,21],<br />

a more recent adaptation of the classical method.<br />

The surfaces were subjected to a sterilization<br />

process in or<strong>de</strong>r to diminish the possible<br />

contamination with microorganisms of the glass<br />

sli<strong>de</strong>s which will serve as support for the adherent<br />

marine bacteria. The sli<strong>de</strong>s were <strong>de</strong>greased with<br />

ethanol 70% and sterilized in the drying oven at 180<br />

ºC for one hour [22].<br />

In or<strong>de</strong>r to obtain biofilms, two types of liquid<br />

culture media were used: seawater from the littoral<br />

zone and seawater kept in aquarium conditions in the<br />

Laboratory for Biodiversity Investigation within<br />

“Ovidius” University of Constanta. The aquarium<br />

seawater is frequently used in the study of biofilms<br />

and marine microfouling and it was used in or<strong>de</strong>r to<br />

observe the possible facilitation of their formation<br />

[23].<br />

The method used is accomplished in static<br />

conditions in sterile containers in which 100 ml of<br />

seawater were poured and the sli<strong>de</strong>s were introduced.<br />

This type of method is more advantageous for the<br />

formation of biofilms when there is no system for<br />

148<br />

water recirculation, according to [24], who claims<br />

that the methods with continuous flux prevent the<br />

rapid formation of biofilms within the first hours.<br />

The support sli<strong>de</strong>s for the adherent bacteria<br />

were positioned according to the mentioned methods<br />

in an inclined position compared to the classical<br />

method, in or<strong>de</strong>r to avoid the sedimentation<br />

phenomenon which <strong>de</strong>termines the occurrence of<br />

high <strong>de</strong>nsities of the adherent marine bacteria [25].<br />

The experiment was accomplished in a<br />

thermostatic room at a constant temperature of 18 ºC<br />

in the Laboratory for Biodiversity Investigation<br />

within “Ovidius” University of Constanta and in a<br />

refrigerator at a constant temperature of 6 ºC. The<br />

salinity modification was done only for the littoral<br />

seawater and not for the aquarium water which is a<br />

microecosystem. Thus, seawater salinity, which has a<br />

normal value of 15g/l was modified by adding<br />

osmosis water and certain mixtures per liter obtaining<br />

thus two experimental versions: in the first version,<br />

normal salinity was <strong>de</strong>creased to 10g/l by adding<br />

333ml of osmosis water in 666ml of seawater; in the<br />

second version a salinity of 5g/l was obtained by<br />

adding 666 ml of osmosis water in 333 ml of<br />

seawater.<br />

The study of biofilms was accomplished over a<br />

period of 36 hours during which there was an interval<br />

when no samples were collected. Sample collection<br />

occurred for 12 hours in the first day hourly, followed<br />

by an interval of 12 hours when no samples were<br />

collected and again the following day samples were<br />

collected every two hours for 12 hours.<br />

After collection the sli<strong>de</strong>s were subjected to a<br />

process of fixation with 2.5% formal<strong>de</strong>hy<strong>de</strong> solution<br />

in artificial seawater (solution with marine salts with<br />

a concentration of 18g/l, similar to the Black Sea) for<br />

30 minutes and then subjected to <strong>de</strong>salinization by<br />

washing for 10 minutes in three successive solutions<br />

with the following content: 75% artificial seawater<br />

with 25% osmosis water, 50% artificial seawater with<br />

50% osmosis water and 100% osmosis water. The<br />

<strong>de</strong>salinization was realized in or<strong>de</strong>r to prevent the<br />

formation of salt crystals which absorb the<br />

fluorescent coloring matter and reflect it, affecting<br />

thus the cell visualization [26].<br />

After <strong>de</strong>salinization, the samples were<br />

introduced in a solution with 0.5% gentian violet in<br />

10 ml ethanol and 90 ml distilled water for one


Aurelia Manuela Moldoveanu, Ioan Ar<strong>de</strong>lean / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 147-156 (2010)<br />

minute. Afterwards, they were abundantly washed<br />

twice with osmosis water in or<strong>de</strong>r to eliminate the<br />

excess of coloring matter [27].<br />

The sample investigation was done by means of<br />

the Hund microscope, cell counting being done using<br />

an ocular grid, calibrated according to the standard<br />

procedure [28]; cells within 20 microscopic fields<br />

per each sample were counted, according to the<br />

standard counting procedures for the surface bacteria<br />

[29]. Thus, the values of cellular <strong>de</strong>nsity are<br />

expressed on the graphs represented by the mean of<br />

the 80 microscopic fields per each sample.<br />

3. Results and Discussions<br />

3.1 The chemical analysis of water<br />

There are differences between the two types of<br />

culture media used for the generation of bacterial<br />

biofilms on the hydrophile surface of glass sli<strong>de</strong>s and<br />

in or<strong>de</strong>r to emphasize their existence we analyzed the<br />

seawater samples in the Chemistry Laboratory within<br />

the “Grigore Antipa” Marine Research Institute of<br />

Constanta (Table 1).<br />

The chemical analysis of seawater emphasized<br />

the existence of differences among the chemical<br />

parameters: salinity, pH, concentration of inorganic<br />

substances between the two types of seawater used.<br />

The littoral seawater has normal parameters also<br />

registered in previous years [30], but the aquarium<br />

seawater has values well over the normal limit with<br />

an increase of over 10g/l of salinity and a <strong>de</strong>crease of<br />

pH from 8.12 (normal value for littoral seawater) to<br />

6.56 units for the aquarium water, almost two units<br />

less than the initial value. The concentration of<br />

inorganic substances is well above the normal one for<br />

seawater. The concentration of nitrates is three times<br />

higher compared to the normal value, while the<br />

concentration of polyphosphates is over 84 times<br />

higher.<br />

The existence of these differences between the<br />

two used culture media can cause changes in the<br />

formation manner of bacterial biofilms in liquid<br />

medium, as well as the temporal dynamic of their<br />

formation. The bacterial biofilms formed are an<br />

assemblage of surface-associated microbial cells that<br />

149<br />

is enclosed in an extracellular polymeric substance<br />

matrix.<br />

3.2 The formation of biofilms un<strong>de</strong>r the<br />

influence of temperature<br />

Figure one shows the values of cellular <strong>de</strong>nsity<br />

obtained after the modification of the temperature<br />

factor for the biofilms formed on the hydrophile<br />

surface of glass sli<strong>de</strong>s and collected from the<br />

containers with littoral seawater kept at a constant<br />

temperature of 18ºC and 6 ºC, respectively.<br />

The data analysis emphasized the existence of<br />

successive stages for the formation of biofilms. Thus,<br />

in the case of the biofilms formed at 18 ºC, one hour<br />

after the sli<strong>de</strong>s immersion the cellular <strong>de</strong>nsity is<br />

12∙10 2 cel/mm 2 . This value doubles eight hours later<br />

to 25 ∙10 2 cel/mm 2 and increases progressively to a<br />

ten<strong>de</strong>ncy to triple the cellular <strong>de</strong>nsity to 37 ∙ 10 2<br />

cel/mm 2 11 hours later. After 12 hours, during which<br />

the sli<strong>de</strong>s were left over night, the following day the<br />

cellular <strong>de</strong>nsity reaches the value of 45∙10 2 cel/mm 2<br />

24 hours after immersion. The value increases<br />

progressively to 60∙10 2 cel/mm 2 36 hours after<br />

immersion<br />

For the seawater in the containers kept at 6 ºC in<br />

the refrigerator, there is a progressive increase from 5<br />

∙10 2 cel/mm 2 only one hour after immersion and a<br />

doubling of this value seven hours later to 10 ∙10 2<br />

cel/mm 2 , as well as tripling to 15∙10 2 cel/mm 2 eight<br />

hours later. The following day, after 12 hours, the<br />

cellular <strong>de</strong>nsity was 41∙10 2 cel/mm 2 and increased<br />

progressively to 54∙10 2 cel/mm 2 .<br />

The progression of cellular <strong>de</strong>nsity growth is<br />

over 2.3 for the biofilms formed at 18 ºC during the<br />

first 12 hours and below 1.2 after 24 hours. Also, in<br />

the case of the biofilms formed in containers kept at 6<br />

ºC, the progression is over 1.9 during the first 12<br />

hours and below 1.1 after 24 hours. On the first day,<br />

after 12 hours, there is a difference of approx. 9∙10 2<br />

cel/mm 2 between the two progressions of <strong>de</strong>nsity<br />

growth, <strong>de</strong>pending on temperature. 24 hours later, the<br />

difference is below 8∙10 2 cel/mm 2 and 36 hours later<br />

it rises to 10∙10 2 cel/mm 2 .<br />

A number of experiments regarding bacterial<br />

adhesion were accomplished on different types of<br />

surfaces (copper, PVC and polybuten) by Rogers [31]<br />

at different temperatures (20 ºC, 40 ºC, 50 ºC and 60


The formation of bacterial biofilms... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 147-156 (2010)<br />

ºC) using the species Legionella pneumophila (a<br />

species with wi<strong>de</strong> temperature limits between 5.7 and<br />

63 ºC) and other strains of non-Legionella type over a<br />

period of 21 days. As a result, it was observed that<br />

the used strains displayed a logarithmic growth with a<br />

<strong>de</strong>nsity value of 1.3∙10 4 cel/cm 2 in the growing phase<br />

and 7.56∙10 4 cel/cm 2 on polybutylene and PVC<br />

surfaces for the non-Legionella strains at 20 ºC and<br />

4.25∙10 4 cel/cm 2 for polybutylene surface at 60 ºC. It<br />

is evi<strong>de</strong>nt that the colonization is higher on the<br />

hydrophobe surfaces at 20 ºC, compared to 60 ºC<br />

when the number of bacteria <strong>de</strong>creases due to the<br />

exceeding of the optimal temperature for<br />

microorganism <strong>de</strong>velopment.<br />

Experiments regarding the colonization of<br />

surfaces by the bacterium B<strong>de</strong>llovibrio bacteriovorus<br />

were accomplished by Kelley [32] un<strong>de</strong>r the<br />

influence of different temperatures (between 4 and 29<br />

ºC), using clam valves, glass and polystyrene as<br />

substrate, and observing the existence of positive<br />

correlations in the case of the factor temperature and<br />

the formation of biofilms, with maximum association<br />

of cells in the biofilms at 18 ºC and a minimum one at<br />

14 ºC, as well as a significant <strong>de</strong>crease of <strong>de</strong>nsity at<br />

temperatures below 5 ºC after 24 hours, followed by<br />

a progressive increase of <strong>de</strong>nsity 120 hours after the<br />

beginning of the experiment.<br />

The values obtained <strong>de</strong>monstrated a logarithmic<br />

increase of the number of adherent cells from 1.1 ∙10 5<br />

CFU/cm 2 to 1.4∙10 5 CFU/cm 2 for the clam valves,<br />

1.7∙10 3 CFU/cm 2 and 1.8∙10 4 CFU/cm 2 for glass<br />

and 5.4∙10 3 CFU/cm 2 and 1.0 ∙10 4 CFU/cm 2 for<br />

polystyrene.<br />

A number of experiments regarding the capacity<br />

of accomplished certain isolates of<br />

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia to form biofilms in<br />

variable temperature conditions (18 ºC, 32 ºC, 37 ºC)<br />

by were realized by Di Bonaventura [33] using<br />

different strains. There is an increase of the quantity<br />

of biofilms for the strains exposed to 32 ºC after one<br />

day to 0.680 BPI compared to those exposed to 18 ºC<br />

(0.557 BPI) and 37 ºC (0.491 BPI). In what regards<br />

the used strains, the temperature did not modify<br />

significantly their distribution: 82% of those used<br />

formed biofilms and only 2% did not form them. One<br />

strain formed biofilms only at 18 ºC and two strains<br />

only at 32 ºC. The capacity to forms biofilms is<br />

150<br />

important even at room temperature (18 ºC), but the<br />

adherence value is lower.<br />

The following day, after the 12 hour interval<br />

when no samples were collected, the <strong>de</strong>nsity value<br />

was 41∙10 2 cel/mm 2 and there was a progressive<br />

growth towards 55∙10 2 cel/mm 2 .<br />

Data in specialized literature confirm the<br />

existence of a growth in bacterial <strong>de</strong>nsity <strong>de</strong>pending<br />

on the exposure time of the surfaces to aquatic<br />

environment and the increase of temperature. Thus, at<br />

18 ºC, up to 25-30 ºC, there is an optimal bacterial<br />

growth. But temperatures over 35 ºC, 40 ºC and 50<br />

ºC affect the formation of biofilms because the<br />

optimum limits for the survival of certain bacterial<br />

species are excee<strong>de</strong>d<br />

Our experiments took place between the<br />

optimum limits for mesophile bacteria, noticing an<br />

increase of the <strong>de</strong>nsity values at 18 ºC, compared to 6<br />

ºC (kept in a refrigerator).<br />

In the case of the sli<strong>de</strong>s immersed in containers<br />

with aquarium water at 18 ºC, Figure 2 displays an<br />

increase of the bacterial <strong>de</strong>nsity from 16∙10 2 cel/mm 2<br />

one hour after immersion to a double value of 32∙10 2<br />

cel/mm 2 eight hours later. After 12 hours, during<br />

which the sli<strong>de</strong>s were left over night, there is a<br />

ten<strong>de</strong>ncy for the tripling of the cellular <strong>de</strong>nsity to<br />

49∙10 2 cel/mm 2 22 hours after the immersion of the<br />

sli<strong>de</strong>s into liquid medium and a progressive increase<br />

towards 62∙10 2 cel/mm 2 .<br />

For the containers kept at 6 ºC, the <strong>de</strong>nsity<br />

increases to 5∙10 2 cel/mm 2 one hour from immersion<br />

towards a double value of 13∙10 2 cel/mm 2 seven<br />

hours later and a progressive growth from 22 ∙10 2<br />

cel/mm 2 ten hours later when there is a ten<strong>de</strong>ncy for<br />

a triple value of the <strong>de</strong>nsity of adherent bacteria.<br />

The growth occurs based on a progression of<br />

2.5 in the case of biofilms formed in aquarium water<br />

kept at 18 ºC during the first 12 hours. There is a<br />

<strong>de</strong>crease to 1.1 after 24 hours from immersion. The<br />

difference between the two progressions is 4∙10 2<br />

cel/mm 2 during the first 12 hours from immersion<br />

and it increases to 8 ∙10 2 cel/mm 2 24 hours later. It<br />

<strong>de</strong>creases 36 hours later to 7 ∙10 2 cel/mm 2 .<br />

In variable conditions of temperature, the<br />

bacterial colonization occurs more quickly in<br />

aquarium seawater. Thus, Toren [34] realizes<br />

experiments regarding the formation of biofilms<br />

(Vibrio sp. strain AK-1) on a coral surface in case of


Aurelia Manuela Moldoveanu, Ioan Ar<strong>de</strong>lean / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 147-156 (2010)<br />

temperature variation (16º C, 23º C, 29º C) and<br />

registers a <strong>de</strong>crease of the quantity of inoculate from<br />

1.2 ∙10 8 cel/l to 1.2∙10 2 cel/l used with the increase of<br />

temperature, as well as an increased adhesion at high<br />

temperatures during the first hours from immersion.<br />

Experiments were realizes by Else [5] regarding<br />

the bacterial colonization of the hydrophile surface of<br />

metals (stainless steel, titanium and nickel) in<br />

variable conditions of temperature (30º C, 60º C and<br />

70º C) and humidity over a longer period of time<br />

(from a few days to 18 months). They observed an<br />

increase of adherent bacteria between 1.06∙10 2 cel/cm<br />

2 and 7.61 ∙10 2 cel/cm 2 at a temperature of 30º C on<br />

steel plates. They also observed a <strong>de</strong>crease of the<br />

number of bacteria from the first day for the plates<br />

exposed to high temperatures (60º C and 70º C),<br />

especially on those of nickel and steel.<br />

In what regards the role of the bacterial film in<br />

the mediation of invertebrate attachment and fouling<br />

formation, Lau et al. [35] realized experiments at<br />

different temperatures (16º C, 23º C and 30º C),<br />

noticing an increase in the number of bacteria from<br />

14.3∙10 3 cel/mm -2 at 16º C to 21.2∙10 3 cel/mm -2 at<br />

30º C. The experiments emphasized a more<br />

significant influence of the temperature on the<br />

biomass than on the bacterial <strong>de</strong>nsity.<br />

A number of experiments regarding the<br />

formation of biofilms in different conditions of<br />

temperature were realized by Di Bonaventura [36]<br />

together with other collaborators accomplish in 2007<br />

(4º C, 12º C, 22º C, 37º C) by Listeria<br />

monocytogenes on the hydrophile surface of glass,<br />

steel and the hydrophobe surface of polystyrene. The<br />

results emphasized a progressive increase on the<br />

surface at 4 ºC of 0.206, at 12 ºC BPI to 0.233 BPI,<br />

22º C to 0.366 BPI, in comparison to polystyrene and<br />

stainless steel. At 37º C the values are close to those<br />

from the three surfaces studied, but there is also<br />

greater species variability. Still, the most<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>rable growth of 1.275 was obtained on the<br />

hydrophobe surface of polystyrene.<br />

Bacterial <strong>de</strong>nsity registers an increase of the<br />

adherent bacteria with higher values for the biofilm<br />

formed in aquarium water kept at 18 ºC, compared to<br />

the one kept at 6 ºC. The values obtained are higher<br />

than those for seawater, which is due to the different<br />

physical and chemical properties of aquarium water<br />

and to the nutrients. Adherent marine bacteria attach<br />

151<br />

themselves to surfaces and form microcolonies in the<br />

first hour after immersion in the marine medium.<br />

They grow in size with the immersion period, data<br />

confirmed by [24].<br />

3.3 The formation of biofilms un<strong>de</strong>r the<br />

influence of salinity<br />

Variation of salinity was done in or<strong>de</strong>r to<br />

observe the influence of osmotic conditions on the<br />

process of bacterial adherence and the formation of<br />

the initial phases of biofilms. For the sli<strong>de</strong>s immersed<br />

in containers with seawater with 15g/l salinity, Figure<br />

3 displays an increase of bacterial <strong>de</strong>nsity to 12∙10 2<br />

cel/mm 2 one hour after immersion towards a<br />

doubling of this value to 25∙10 2 cel/mm 2 eight hours<br />

later.<br />

The sli<strong>de</strong>s were left over night for 12 hours and<br />

the following day there was a progressive increase of<br />

the cellular <strong>de</strong>nsity value of 49∙10 2 cel/mm 2 where<br />

there is a ten<strong>de</strong>ncy for a triple value towards 62∙10 2<br />

cel/mm 2 .<br />

In the case of containers with seawater with<br />

modified salinity (addition of osmosis water 10g/l),<br />

the bacterial <strong>de</strong>nsity increased to 4∙10 2 cel/mm 2 one<br />

hour after immersion to a double value of 8∙10 2<br />

cel/mm 2 after four hours and the progressive increase<br />

from 18 ∙10 2 cel/mm 2 after eight hours when there is<br />

a ten<strong>de</strong>ncy to triple the value of bacterial <strong>de</strong>nsity.<br />

After the 12 hour interval when the sli<strong>de</strong>s were left<br />

over night in containers, there is an increase of the<br />

cellular <strong>de</strong>nsity from 41∙10 2 cel/mm 2 24 hours after<br />

immersion to 54∙10 2 cel/mm 2 36 hours after<br />

immersion. The growth progression during the first<br />

12 hours in the case of the biofilms formed at a<br />

salinity of 15g/l is higher, with a value of 2.3 and<br />

displays a <strong>de</strong>crease after 24 hours to 1.1. In the case<br />

of the biofilms formed at a salinity of 10g/l, the<br />

growth progression is 2.4 during the first 12 hours<br />

and it <strong>de</strong>creases after 24 hours to 1.1. The difference<br />

between the two progressions is 2∙10 2 cel/mm 2 in the<br />

first 12 hours, it increases to 8∙10 2 cel/mm 2 24 hours<br />

after immersion and remains constant at this value<br />

until 36 hours.<br />

In the case of containers with seawater with<br />

modified salinity (addition of osmosis water 5g/l),<br />

Figure 4 displays an increase of bacterial <strong>de</strong>nsity<br />

from 2∙10 2 cel/mm 2 one hour after immersion to a


The formation of bacterial biofilms... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 147-156 (2010)<br />

double value of 4∙10 2 cel/mm 2 three hours later and<br />

the progressive increase to 9 ∙10 2 cel/mm 2 six hours<br />

later when the ten<strong>de</strong>ncy is for a triple value of the<br />

bacterial <strong>de</strong>nsity. The sli<strong>de</strong>s collected after 12 hours<br />

display a progressive increase of cellular <strong>de</strong>nsity from<br />

31∙10 2 cel/mm 2 24 hours after immersion to 49∙10 2<br />

cel/mm 2 36 hours later.<br />

The increase is accomplished based on a<br />

progression with a value of 2.3 in the first 12 hours in<br />

the case of the biofilms formed at 15g/l salinity and a<br />

<strong>de</strong>crease of this value to 1.1 after 24 hours.<br />

For the biofilms formed at 5g/l salinity, the<br />

value of the growth progression is 1.5 in the firs 12<br />

hours, which drops to 1.4 in the following 24 hours.<br />

Between the two growth progressions there are<br />

differences between the values of cellular <strong>de</strong>nsity.<br />

Thus, after 12 hours, the difference is 13∙10 2 cel/mm<br />

2 and it drops after 24 hours to 8∙10 2 cel/mm 2 , but<br />

increases after 36 hours to 13∙10 2 cel/mm 2 .<br />

While studying the colonization of surfaces by<br />

the bacterium B<strong>de</strong>llovibrio bacteriovorus, [32]<br />

realized experiments un<strong>de</strong>r the influence of different<br />

temperatures and observed the existence of a<br />

colonization ten<strong>de</strong>ncy and biofilm formation between<br />

3.4 g/l and 35 g/l. Salinity influenced the formation of<br />

biofilms even at values below 5 g/l, the number of<br />

adherent bacteria in the biofilm formed at 11g/l<br />

salinity being well over the expected one. At 4g/l<br />

salinity there is a <strong>de</strong>crease in the number of cells from<br />

3.5∙10 6 CFU/cm 2 to 3.8∙10 4 CFU/cm 2 five days after<br />

immersion.<br />

Some experiments regarding the role of<br />

bacterial biofilm were accomplished by [35] in the<br />

mediation of invertebrate attachment and<br />

microfouling formation at different temperatures and<br />

salinity values of 20g/l-34g/l. There is bacterial<br />

increase from 12.8∙10 3 cel/mm -2 to 20g/l la 21.2∙10 3<br />

cel/mm -2 at 34 g/l. The experiments reve<strong>ale</strong>d no<br />

significant correlation between salinity and bacterial<br />

<strong>de</strong>nsity in regards to biomass.<br />

Some experiments were accomplished in<br />

regards to the role of salinity (between 12g/l and<br />

80g/l) in the surface corrosion [37] achieves some<br />

experiments using stainless steel as substrate. They<br />

reve<strong>ale</strong>d the existence of a drop of cellular <strong>de</strong>nsity<br />

with the increase of water salinity, noticing a<br />

corrosion maximum at 35 g/l between 1.7 ∙10 9<br />

CFU/cm 2 and 2.1∙10 CFU/cm 2 for the aerobe species<br />

152<br />

analyzed. The experimental data have increased<br />

values compared to those obtained by our<br />

experiments.<br />

The values of cellular <strong>de</strong>nsity emphasize an<br />

increase correlated with the modification of salinity<br />

value as a whole, salinity increase from 5g/l to 10g/l<br />

and to 15g/l, the normal average value for seawater.<br />

These data are confirmed by the specialty literature as<br />

long as the increase is recor<strong>de</strong>d between certain<br />

optimum salinity limits.<br />

The <strong>de</strong>nsity values obtained when salinity was<br />

modified to 5g/l are lower than those for salinity from<br />

10g/l and 15g/l, which <strong>de</strong>monstrates that a possible<br />

supply of fresh water in the natural environment may<br />

influence the formation manner of the biofilms.<br />

Microcolonies form from the very first hours<br />

after the immersion of the hydrophile surfaces in the<br />

case of salinity variation as well. These data are<br />

confirmed by [24] in the specialized literature in the<br />

case of experiments for the formation of biofilms in<br />

static conditions.<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

The environmental factor such as temperature<br />

and salinity seems to influence bacterial adherence.<br />

The formation of the initial layers of the<br />

biofilms and their temporal dynamics in “in vitro”<br />

conditions <strong>de</strong>termines a progressive increase of<br />

cellular <strong>de</strong>nsity and the formation of microcolonies<br />

from the first hour after immersion in liquid medium.<br />

The modification of temperature and salinity values<br />

<strong>de</strong>termined a <strong>de</strong>crease of the total number of adherent<br />

cells, compared to the normal one on the hydrophile<br />

surface of glass, by mechanism(s) which are un<strong>de</strong>r<br />

investigation.<br />

5. References<br />

[1] ZOBELL C.E., 1943 – The effect of solid<br />

surfaces upon bacterial, J. Bacteriol., 46 (1): 39–<br />

56.<br />

[2] COSTERTON J.W., GEESEY G.G., CHENG<br />

K.J. 1978 – How Bacteria Stick, Scientific<br />

American; 238 (1): 86-95.<br />

[3] ZARNEA GH., 1994 – Tratat <strong>de</strong> Microbiologie<br />

generalã, Ecologia microrganismelor, Vol. 5,<br />

Ed.Aca<strong>de</strong>mei Române, Bucureşti.


Aurelia Manuela Moldoveanu, Ioan Ar<strong>de</strong>lean / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 147-156 (2010)<br />

[4] LAZAR V. 2003- A<strong>de</strong>renţa microbianã,<br />

Aca<strong>de</strong>miei Române, Bucureşti , 216 pp.<br />

[5] ELSE T. A., PANTLE C. R., AMY P. S., 2003-<br />

Boundaries for Biofilm Formation: Humidity and<br />

Temperature, App. .and Environ. Microbiology,<br />

69(8): 5006–5010.<br />

[6] CARLUCCI A. F. AND PRAMER D., 1959-<br />

Factors Affecting the Survival of Bacteria in Sea<br />

Water, Microbiological Process Report, 7: 388-<br />

392<br />

[7] DUFOUR PH., 1982 - Influence <strong>de</strong>s conditions<br />

<strong>de</strong> milieu sur la biodéradation <strong>de</strong>s matieres<br />

organiques dans une lagune tropic<strong>ale</strong><br />

Oceanologica Acta, 5 ( 3): 355-363.<br />

[8] ROSZAK D.B. AND WELL C., 1987 – Survival<br />

Strategies of Bacteria in the Natural<br />

Environement, Micro. Rev. 365-379.<br />

[9] COSTERTON J.W. 2007- The biofilm Primer,<br />

Springer, 200 pp.<br />

[10] PARSEK M. R. GREENBERG E.P., 2008 -<br />

Sociomicrobiology: the connections between<br />

quorum sensing and biofilms Trends in Microbioy ,<br />

13 ( 1): 28-33.<br />

[11] ZOBELL C. E. AND CONN J. E., 1940 -<br />

Studies on the thermal sensitivity of marine<br />

bacteria, J. Bacteriol., 40 (2): 223–238.<br />

[12] MITTELMAN M.W.1998 - Structure and<br />

Functional Characteristics of Bacterial Biofilms,<br />

Dairy Sci., 81: 2760–2764.<br />

[13] COMPERE C., 1999 - Biofilms en mileu marin,<br />

Techniques Sciences Metho<strong>de</strong>s, 11: 48-54.<br />

[14] WHITE-ZIEGLER C. A., SUZIN U., PEREZ N.<br />

M., BERNS A. L., MALHOWSKI A.J. AND<br />

YOUNG S., 2008- Low temperature (23ºC)<br />

increases expression of biofilm, cold-shock- and<br />

RpoS-<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt genes in Escherichia coli K-12,<br />

Microbiology, 154 : 148–166.<br />

[15] EDDLEMAN H., 1998 - Optimum Temperature<br />

for Growth of Bacteria, Indiana Biolab, 14045<br />

Huff St., Palmyra IN 47164<br />

[16] STANLEY S. 0. AND MORITA R. Y., 1968 -<br />

Salinity Effect on the Maximal Growth<br />

Temperature of Some Bacteria Isolated from<br />

Marine Environments, J. of Bacteriology, 95 (1)<br />

: 169-173.<br />

[17] HENRICI, A.T., 1933 -Studies of Freshwater<br />

Bacteria: I. A Direct Microscopic Technique.<br />

153<br />

[18] LEWANDOWSKI Z. AND STOODLEY P.,<br />

1995 - Flow induced vibrations, drag force, and<br />

pressure drop in conduits covered with biofilm,<br />

International IAWQ Conference Workshop on<br />

Biofilm Structure, Growth, and Dynamics,<br />

Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.<br />

[19] POSCH T., FRANZOI J., PRADER<br />

M.,.SALCHER M., 2009 - New image analysis<br />

tool to study biomass andmorphotypes of three<br />

major bacterioplankton groups in an alpine lake,<br />

Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 54 : 113–126.<br />

[20] COSTERTON J.W, GEESEY G.G, CHENG<br />

K.J. - 1978 How Bacteria Stick, Scientific<br />

American, 238 (1): 86-95<br />

[21] http://www.BiofilmsONLINE.com, 2008:<br />

Techniques & Protocols, Henrici’s Microbial<br />

Capture Technique.<br />

[22] LAZAR V., HERLEA V., CERNAT R.,<br />

BALOTESCU M., BULAI D., MORARU A.,<br />

2004 - Microbiologie generala, Manual <strong>de</strong><br />

lucrarii parctice, Universitatii Bucuresti, 320 pp.<br />

[23] HOVANEC T. A. AND DELONG E. F., 1996-<br />

Comparative Analysis of Nitrifying Bacteria<br />

Associated with Freshwater and Marine Aquaria,<br />

Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 62 (8) : 2888–2896.<br />

[24] MERRITT J. H., KADOURI D. E., AND.<br />

O’TOOLE G. A 2005- Growing and Analyzing<br />

Static Biofilms, Current Protocols in<br />

Microbiology, 1B.1.1-1B.1.17.<br />

[25] KUMAN A. AND PRASAD R., 2006 - Biofilms<br />

Jk. Science., 8 (1): 14 -17.<br />

[26] RUBIO C., 2002 - Comprehension <strong>de</strong>s<br />

mecanismes d’adhesion <strong>de</strong>s biofilms en milieu<br />

marin en vue <strong>de</strong> la conception <strong>de</strong> nouveaux<br />

motens <strong>de</strong> prevention, These <strong>de</strong> dcotorat, Paris,.<br />

216 pp.<br />

[27] SONAK S,BHOSLE N., 1995- A simple method<br />

to assess bacterial attachment to surfaces,<br />

Biofouling, 9(1): 31-38<br />

[28] HULEA A 1969 - Ghid pentru labortoarele <strong>de</strong><br />

micologie <strong>şi</strong> bacteriologie. Ed. Agrosilvică,<br />

Bucureşti.<br />

[29] FRY, J.C., 1990 – Direct methods and biomass<br />

estimation. Meth. Microbiol, 22: 41-85.<br />

[30] COCIASU A., LAZAR L. AND VASILIU D.<br />

2008 –New Ten<strong>de</strong>ncy in nutrient evolution from<br />

romanian costal waters, Cercetarii marine<br />

INCDM, 38: 7-23.


The formation of bacterial biofilms... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 147-156 (2010)<br />

[31] ROGERS J., DOWSETT A. B., DENNIS P. J.,<br />

LEE J. V., AND KEEVIL C. W., 1994 -<br />

Influence of Temperature and Plumbing<br />

Material Selection on Biofilm Formation and<br />

Growth of Legionella pneumophila in a Mo<strong>de</strong>l<br />

Potable Water System Containing Complex<br />

Microbial Flora, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 60<br />

(5): 1585-1592.<br />

[32] KELLEY J. I., TURNG B.F, WILLIAMS H. N.,<br />

AND BAER M. L., 1997 - Effects of<br />

Temperature, Salinity, and Substrate on the<br />

Colonization of Surfaces In Situ by Aquatic<br />

B<strong>de</strong>llovibrios, Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 63: 84-<br />

90.<br />

[33] DI BONAVENTURA G., STEPANOVIC S.,<br />

PICCIANI C., POMPILIO A., PICCOLOMINI<br />

R., 2007- Effect of Enviromental Factors on<br />

Biofilm Formation by Clinical<br />

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates, Folia<br />

Microbiol., 52 (1): 86-90.<br />

[34] TOREN L.A.., LANDAU L. KUSHMARO A.,<br />

LOYA Y. AND ROSENBERG E., 1998 -<br />

Effect of Temperature on Adhesion of Vibrio<br />

Strain AK-1 to Oculina patagonica and on Coral<br />

Bleaching , Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 64 (4):<br />

1379–1384.<br />

[35] LAU S.C.K, THIYAGARAJAN V., CHEUNG<br />

S.C.K, QIAN P.Y., 2005 - Roles of bacterial<br />

community composition in biofilms as a<br />

mediator for larval settlement of three marine<br />

invertebrates, Aquat Microb. Ecol, 38: 41–51.<br />

[36] DI BONAVENTURA G., PICCOLOMINI R.,<br />

PALUDI D., D’ORIO V., VERGARA A.,<br />

CONTER M. AND IANIERI A., 2007-<br />

Influence of temperature on biofilm formation by<br />

Listeria monocytogenes on various food-contact<br />

surfaces: relationship with motility and cell<br />

surface hydrophobicity, J. Appl. Microbio., 104 :<br />

1552–1561.<br />

[37] FRANCA F.P., FERREIRA C.A.,<br />

LUTTERBACH M.T.S., 2000- Effect of<br />

different salinities of a dynamic water system on<br />

biofilm formation, J. of Industrial Micro. &<br />

Bioteh., 25: 45-48.<br />

154


Density (10<br />

2 cel/mm 2 )<br />

Density (10<br />

2 cel/mm 2 )<br />

The formation of bacterial biofilms... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 147-156 (2010)<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

Early succesion of biofilms in containers over a period of 12 hours<br />

T 0=0 hours<br />

Sli<strong>de</strong>s Sea Water( Temp.6ºC)<br />

Sli<strong>de</strong>s Sea Water( Temp.18ºC)<br />

y = 2.3022x + 6.7253<br />

R 2 = 0.9354<br />

Table 1. The values of the seawater chemical parameters (liquid culture medium)<br />

Chemical parameters Sea water (zona litorala) Sea water<br />

(Aquarium)<br />

salinity 15.10 g/L 25.10 g/L<br />

pH 8.12 unit. 6.56 unit.<br />

P-PO4 0.74 µmoli/dm 3 63.80 µmoli/dm 3<br />

N-NO2 0.42 µmoli/dm 3 12.51 µmoli/dm 3<br />

N-NH4 1.13 µmoli/dm 3 5.46 µmoli/dm 3<br />

N-NO3 3.14 µmoli/dm 3 30.25 µmoli/dm 3<br />

Si-SiO4 21.16 µmoli/dm 3 0.24 µmoli/dm 3<br />

y = 1.9066x + 1.7912<br />

R 2 = 0.9668<br />

0<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />

Time (hours)<br />

Density (10 2 cel/mm2 )<br />

155<br />

66<br />

61<br />

56<br />

51<br />

46<br />

41<br />

36<br />

Early succesion of biofilms in containers over a period of 12 hours<br />

T 0=24 hours<br />

Sli<strong>de</strong>s Sea Water ( Temp.6ºC)<br />

Sli<strong>de</strong>s Sea Water (Temp.18ºC)<br />

y = 1.25x + 43.107<br />

R 2 = 0.9895<br />

y = 1.1429x + 35.714<br />

R 2 = 0.9922<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14<br />

Time (hours)<br />

Fig.1. The formation of a biofilm un<strong>de</strong>r the influence of temperature in containers with littoral seawater<br />

Ealy succesion of biofilms in containers over a period of 12 hours<br />

T 0=0 hours<br />

y = 2.6429x + 1.9121<br />

R 2 y = 2.5165x + 10.363<br />

R<br />

= 0.9883<br />

2 45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

Sli<strong>de</strong>s Aquarium (Temp.6ºC)<br />

Sli<strong>de</strong>s Aquarium ( Temp.18ºC)<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

= 0.8844<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />

Time (hours)<br />

Density (10 2 cel/mm2 )<br />

65<br />

60<br />

55<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

Early succesion of biofilms in containers over a period of 12 hours<br />

T 0=24 hours<br />

Sli<strong>de</strong>s Aquarium (Temp.6ºC)<br />

Sli<strong>de</strong>s Aquarium (Temp.18ºC)<br />

y = 1.125x + 47.839<br />

R 2 = 0.9883<br />

y = 1.2321x + 39.661<br />

R 2 = 0.9919<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14<br />

Time (hours)<br />

Fig.2. The formation of a biofilm un<strong>de</strong>r the influence of temperature in the containers with aquarium seawater


Aurelia Manuela Moldoveanu, Ioan Ar<strong>de</strong>lean / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 147-156 (2010)<br />

Density (10<br />

2 cel/mm 2 )<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

Ealty succesion of biofilms in containers over a peiod of 12 hours<br />

T 0=0 hours<br />

Sli<strong>de</strong>s Sea Water(Sal.10g/l)<br />

Sli<strong>de</strong>s Sea Water ( Sal.15g/l)<br />

y = 2.3022x + 6.7253<br />

R 2 = 0.9354<br />

y = 2.4341x - 0.2198<br />

R 2 = 0.9793<br />

0<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />

Time(hours)<br />

156<br />

Density (10 2 cel/mm2 )<br />

65<br />

60<br />

55<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

Ealry succesion of biofilms in containers over a period of 12 hours<br />

T 0= 24 hours<br />

Sli<strong>de</strong>s Sea Water(Sal.10g/l)<br />

Sli<strong>de</strong>s Sea Water(Sal.15g/l)<br />

y = 1.125x + 47.839<br />

R 2 = 0.9883<br />

y = 1.1607x + 39.446<br />

R 2 = 0.9816<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14<br />

Time (hours)<br />

Fig.3. The formation of a biofilm un<strong>de</strong>r the influence of salinity <strong>de</strong>crease (from 15g/l to 5 g/l) in the containers with<br />

littoral seawater<br />

Density (10 2cel/mm2 )<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

Early succesion of biofilms in containers over a period of 12 hours<br />

T 0= 0 hours<br />

Sli<strong>de</strong>s Sea Water ( Sal. 5g/l)<br />

Sli<strong>de</strong>s Sea Water (Sal.15g/l)<br />

y = 2.3022x + 6.7253<br />

R 2 = 0.9354<br />

y = 1.5385x - 0.2308<br />

R 2 = 0.9926<br />

0<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />

Time(hours)<br />

Density (10 2 cel/mm2 )<br />

69<br />

64<br />

59<br />

54<br />

49<br />

44<br />

39<br />

34<br />

29<br />

Early succesion of biofilm in containers over a period of 12 hours<br />

T 0=24 hours<br />

Sli<strong>de</strong>s Sea Water ( Sal.5g/l)<br />

Sli<strong>de</strong>s Sea Water (Sal.15g/l)<br />

y = 1.125x + 47.839<br />

R 2 = 0.9883<br />

y = 1.4286x + 28.714<br />

R 2 = 0.9627<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14<br />

Time (hours)<br />

Fig.4. Biofilm formation un<strong>de</strong>r the influence of salinity <strong>de</strong>crease (from 15g/l to 10g/l) in containers with littoral<br />

seawater


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

THE CLINICAL UTILITY OF ADITIONAL METHODS IN EFFUSIONS<br />

EVALUATION<br />

Ana Maria CRETU * , Mariana ASCHIE ** , Diana BADIU ** , Natalia ROSOIU ***<br />

*Ovidius University of Constanţa, Natural Sciences Faculty, Department of Biology,<br />

Mamaia Avenue, No. 124, Constanţa, 900552, Romania, e-mail: cretu_anamaria@yahoo.com<br />

** Clinical Emergency Hospital of Constanta, Department of Pathology, Tomis Avenue, No. 145, 900591,<br />

Constanta<br />

***Ovidius University of Constanţa, Medicine Faculty,Mamaia Avenue, No. 124, Constanţa, 900527, Romania<br />

________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: Cells from reactive or hyperplasic mesothelium shed from body cavity surface, in various biological<br />

conditions, may present a wi<strong>de</strong> range of <strong>de</strong>viation from normal cellular morphology, making it difficult, or even<br />

impossible, to distinguish them from malignant cells by mean of purely cytological criteria. This study was<br />

carried out with the aim to evaluate if macroscopic features and cytologic formula can be used as potential<br />

diagnostic tool for distinguishing between malignant cells from reactive mesothelial cells in peritoneal effusions.<br />

We have examined the peritoneal effusions collected from 81 available cases, with a histological diagnosis<br />

known, from routine morphologic features. The various macroscopic parameters that were registered by<br />

macroscopic analysis inclu<strong>de</strong>d the registration of color, transparency and fluidity of peritoneal effusions.<br />

Comparing the results, there wasn`t found any relationship between peritoneal fluid containing cancer cells and<br />

liquid color. Cell smear appearance had a various cells populations and the quantitative analysis of effusions was<br />

not enough useful in establishing the final diagnosis.<br />

Keywords: peritoneal effusions, macroscopy, cytology, malign, benign<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The cytological diagnoses of serous effusions<br />

are usually ma<strong>de</strong> by routine cytomorphology with<br />

certainty, allowing treatment <strong>de</strong>cisions. Various<br />

studies have shown a sensitivity of 57.3% and<br />

specificity of 89% by conventional cytology for the<br />

<strong>de</strong>tection of malignant cells in effusion samples [1].<br />

The conventional cytology rate for i<strong>de</strong>ntification<br />

of neoplastic cells in effusions is about 60%. The rate<br />

of diagnostically equivocal effusions in routine<br />

cytology is <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt on the volume of effusion<br />

examined, type of preparation and staining,<br />

experience of the examiner, and application of<br />

ancillary methods [2]. Peritoneal effusions are a<br />

frequently encountered clinical manifestation of<br />

metastatic disease, with breast, ovarian, and lung<br />

carcinomas and malignant mesothelioma leading the<br />

list [3, 4].<br />

Neoplastic cells that disseminate into cavities<br />

containing effusions are highly metastatic and possess<br />

a strong autonomous proliferative drive while<br />

concurrently being stimulatory of exudative<br />

effusions. The diagnosis of a malignant effusion<br />

signifies disease progression and is associated with a<br />

worse prognosis regardless of the tumor site of origin.<br />

Furthermore, cancer cells of different origins differ<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>rably in their biology and have unique<br />

phenotypic and genotypic characteristics [5].<br />

Primary cytomorphologic criteria of malignancy<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong> cellular aggregates, pleomorphism (variable<br />

cellular appearance), anisocytosis (variation in cell<br />

size), anisokaryosis (variation in nuclear size),<br />

multinucleation, prominent to irregular nucleoli,<br />

increased nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio, monomorphic<br />

cellular appearance, and increased mitotic figures.<br />

Hyperplastic mesothelial cells also may exhibit<br />

anisocytosis, anisokaryosis, increased nuclear to<br />

cytoplasmic ratio, binucleate and multinucleate, and<br />

scattered mitoses. Any situation that results in fluid<br />

accumulation within the body cavities can induce<br />

mesothelial cell hyperplasia and exfoliation with an<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


The clinical utility of aditional metho<strong>de</strong>s... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 157-162 (2010)<br />

abnormal cellular morphology [2]. Therefore, the<br />

differentiation between mesothelial cell hyperplasia<br />

and mesothelioma may be difficult or impossible.<br />

The first report of an intraoperative examination<br />

of peritoneal cytology to <strong>de</strong>tect subclinical metastases<br />

was presented in 1971. Patients with normal<br />

peritoneal cytological specimens had better survival<br />

rates than patients with abnormal findings, but only<br />

one abnormal cytologic specimen was found in early<br />

stage disease. [6]. Factors such as in patient versus<br />

outpatient management and associated procedural<br />

discomfort are important in the <strong>de</strong>cision making<br />

process, and the patient should participate in these<br />

subjective consi<strong>de</strong>rations [7].<br />

In addition, the etiology of the primary<br />

complaint is frequently multifactorial. However,<br />

malignant effusions recur, and therefore repeated<br />

paracentesis, especially if the fluid rapidly<br />

reaccumulates, is usually not a good long-term<br />

solution unless the patient’s overall prognosis and<br />

current condition prohibits a more invasive option.<br />

It is difficult to compare results and <strong>de</strong>termine<br />

the true efficacy of different techniques and agents<br />

because endpoints and response criteria as well as the<br />

extent and method of follow-up vary. Therefore<br />

various techniques should be used to increase the<br />

diagnostic accuracy of malignancy in serous<br />

effusions.<br />

2. Material and Methods<br />

This study was based on evaluation of 81<br />

available cases, with a histological diagnosis known,<br />

carried out in Emergency Clinical Hospital of<br />

Constanta – Pathological Anatomy Department<br />

(SCJUC ) from octobre 2007 to January 2010.<br />

Follow-up data were obtained from the Tumor<br />

Registry at SCJUC. Clinical charts of all the patients<br />

whose peritoneal fluid samples were sent for<br />

cytological examination during the study period were<br />

retrieved for relevant information.<br />

The fluid for cytological analysis was collected<br />

during laparotomy from the abdominal cavity. If no<br />

fluid was present, the peritoneal cavity was lavaged<br />

with saline solution, and the fluid was then collected<br />

for analysis.<br />

Giemsa stained and Papanicolaou stained sli<strong>de</strong>s<br />

were prepared from sediment obtained by<br />

158<br />

centrifuging the peritoneal liquid samples at 1500<br />

rpm for 5 minutes, using Shandon Cytospin<br />

preparations. After the centrifugation, the stained is<br />

fixed using alcohol (95% ethyl alcohol) as the<br />

fixative. Effusion cytology was studied from 40<br />

peritoneal effusions associated with at least one<br />

malignancy and 41 effusions collected from pacients<br />

with hepatic cirrhosis.<br />

We have examined the peritoneal effusions<br />

from routine macroscopic and cytologic features.<br />

Determination (the qualitative method) of<br />

cellular <strong>de</strong>nsity, specific weight and protein content<br />

from peritoneal fluid was performed by the Riwalta<br />

reactions [61]. Riwalta reaction is the reaction<br />

performed for differential diagnosis of exudates from<br />

transudates, based on precipitation of fibrin<br />

(insoluble protein, the main component of blood clot,<br />

a result of thrombin action on fibrinogen in plasma<br />

soluble, synthesized by the liver) meeting usual in<br />

inflammatory exudates (transudates usual, do not<br />

contain this fibrin) [10]. The reaction is positive<br />

when dripping the liquid examined in the mixture is<br />

obtaining an op<strong>ale</strong>scent, as a cloud. For obtaining the<br />

liquid peritoneal cytology formula, 100 cellular<br />

elements were measured from each smear cellular,<br />

thus directly establishing a percentage value.<br />

3. Results and Discussions<br />

From all 81 cases who <strong>de</strong>veloped peritoneal<br />

fluid, 41 were benign cases (associated with liver<br />

cirrhosis), 4 cases were associated with hepatic<br />

carcinoma, 4 cases with lung carcinoma, 18 cases<br />

with ovarian carcinoma, 4 cases with breast<br />

carcinoma, 9 cases with gastrointestinal carcinoma<br />

tract and 2 cases with peritoneal mesothelioma (Table<br />

1). The studied cases were divi<strong>de</strong>d into two groups:<br />

the 41 benign cases were inclu<strong>de</strong>d in lot I and 40<br />

cases of peritoneal fluid associated with cancer were<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>d in lot II.<br />

Table 1. Peritoneal fluid distribution according to<br />

primary disease and the number of cases<br />

Lots Primary disease No of<br />

cases<br />

Lot I Hepatic cirrhosis 41<br />

(no=41)


Lot II<br />

(no=40)<br />

Ana Maria Creţu et al. / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 157-162 (2010)<br />

Hepatic cancer 4<br />

Ovarian cancer 18<br />

Gastrointestinal cancer 9<br />

Breast cancer 4<br />

Pulmonary carcinoma 3<br />

Peritoneal mesothelioma 2<br />

In terms of etiology, the highest number of cases<br />

groupt in lot II were shown to have ovarian origin,<br />

represented by ovarian carcinoma (n = 18) (45%),<br />

followed by cases associated with gastrointestinal<br />

carcinoma (n = 9) (22.5%), liver and breast<br />

carcinoma (n = 4) (10%), carcinoma lung (n = 3)<br />

(7.5%) and malignant mesothelioma (n = 2) (5%)<br />

(Fig.1).<br />

The type of neoplasia associated with most<br />

cases with peritoneal effusions accumulation proved<br />

to be represented by ovarian carcinoma.<br />

Fig. 1. Percentage distribution of cases according to<br />

the origin of cancer associated<br />

Most patients in Group II (32.83%) were within<br />

the range of ages 61-70 years (40%), followed by the<br />

51-60 range (35%). Cases registered with ovarian<br />

carcinoma were inclu<strong>de</strong>d in most (61.11%) in the 51-<br />

60 age range, those registered with gastrointestinal<br />

carcinoma and the liver were contained mainly in the<br />

41-50 age range, breast cancers, malignant<br />

mesothelioma and lung were within the range 61-70.<br />

(Fig. 2).<br />

159<br />

Fig. 2. The peritoneal fluid on different intervals of<br />

age (HC hepatic cancer, OC ovarian cancer, GIC<br />

gastrointestinal cancer, BC breast cancer, PC lung<br />

cancer, MM malignant mesothelioma)<br />

According to cancer staging [8],<br />

- stage I: generally inclu<strong>de</strong> small tumors without<br />

invasion and who are perfectly curable in most cases<br />

the prognosis favorable<br />

- stage II and III inclu<strong>de</strong>s tumors with local<br />

invasion of surrounding tissues and lymph no<strong>de</strong>s,<br />

therapeutic approach and prognosis are different<br />

<strong>de</strong>pending on the time cells and organ of origin,<br />

- stage IV: at this stage are in general inoperable<br />

tumors, metastasis and recurrence and a reserved<br />

prognostic survival, only 7 cases (17.5%) (2 / 2, and<br />

peritoneal mesothelioma 100% 5 / 18, 27.77%<br />

ovarian carcinoma) were rated as stage III, the rest<br />

(82.5%) fits into state IV, which shows that, as the<br />

stage progresses neoplasia, this is more prev<strong>ale</strong>nt<br />

peritoneal fluid (Fig.3).<br />

Fig. 3. Percentage of cases according<br />

to stage neoplasia


The clinical utility of aditional metho<strong>de</strong>s... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 157-162 (2010)<br />

From all patients with histopathologic and<br />

clinical data that indicate malignancy, a number of 5<br />

patients (2 / 2, 100% associated with malignant<br />

mesothelioma, 1/4, 25% associated with hepatic<br />

carcinoma, ¼, 25% associated with breast carcinoma,<br />

1/3, 33.33% associated with lung carcinoma) were<br />

<strong>de</strong>ceased before drawing to the final study (a period<br />

of approximately three years from the accumulation<br />

of fluid in the peritoneal cavity), in all cases, the<br />

peritoneal fluid cytology recor<strong>de</strong>d the presence of<br />

malignant cells (Fig. 4).<br />

Fig. 4. Percentage of prognostic survival of patients<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the study (OC- ovarian cancer, GIC -<br />

gastrointestinal cancer, HC - hepatic cancer, BC –<br />

breast cancer, PC - pulmonary cancer, MM -<br />

malignant mesothelioma)<br />

Thus, the percentage of peritoneal fluid<br />

accumulation in the abdominal cavity is directly<br />

proportional to the tumor stage and also with the<br />

diagnosis of malignant peritoneal effusions, meaning<br />

that the progression of cancer is associated with an<br />

unfavorable prognosis. None of the patients with<br />

ovarian or gastric carcinoma were associated with an<br />

unfavorable prognosis, which indicates that this<br />

patients are available for a longer treatment.<br />

Neoplasia stage, histological gra<strong>de</strong> of neoplasia,<br />

positive cytology of peritoneal fluid and patients age<br />

(61-70 years) were correlated statistically with the<br />

prognosis.<br />

The first step in the analysis of peritoneal fluid<br />

was represented by analysis of the macroscopic point<br />

of view of biological material (peritoneal effusions).<br />

160<br />

Thus, it was recor<strong>de</strong>d: the extracted amount, the<br />

product color, transparency and its consistency.<br />

After macroscopic analysis, the most liquids<br />

from the group I was found to shown yellow color<br />

(from very light yellow to orange - yellow), and most<br />

fluid were transparent. In stead, the peritoneal<br />

effusions from group II had a variable macroscopic<br />

appearance: a number of 29/40 (72.5%) were intense<br />

yellow colored and transparents, many of them<br />

(17/29, 42.5% of all liquids associated with a<br />

carcinoma) had tissue fragments occupying<br />

approximately 25-50% from all quantity effusions,<br />

suspen<strong>de</strong>d in liquid; 5 (12.5%) showed a yelloworange<br />

fluid and opaque, and a total of six (15%)<br />

were hemorrhagic (<strong>de</strong>ep red), fluid and opaque (Fig.<br />

5). Of these, 19 / 40 (47.5%) had fragments of tissue<br />

suspen<strong>de</strong>d in peritoneal effusions. These fragments<br />

were then inclu<strong>de</strong>d in paraffin, stained and examined<br />

microscopically.<br />

We can say that the macroscopic analysis of<br />

peritoneal fluid, associated with cases of cancer are<br />

different from those associated with cases of cirrhosis<br />

only by this tissue fragments foun<strong>de</strong>d suspen<strong>de</strong>d in<br />

the effusions, with a capacity of discrimination of<br />

47.5%.<br />

Fig. 5. Peritoneal fluid: yellow (a) and hemorrhagic<br />

The registration of the important differences<br />

existing between macroscopic peritoneal fluids is<br />

essential, representing the first way in effusions<br />

discrimination (in transudates and exudates), so that,<br />

the material subjected can provi<strong>de</strong> useful information<br />

for further evaluation of the cells from cytological<br />

smears. It is known that bleeding effusions (<strong>de</strong>ep red)<br />

are often caused by a cancer and that these liquids<br />

often contain cancer cells [9].


Ana Maria Creţu et al. / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 157-162 (2010)<br />

However, comparing the results, after<br />

performing peritoneal fluid cytology, with those<br />

obtained by macroscopic evaluation, of the 40<br />

effusions associated with at least one malignancy,<br />

only 6 (15%) were foun<strong>de</strong>d to be red colored<br />

(hemorrhagic), emphasizing that it does not exist any<br />

relationship between peritoneal fluid containing<br />

cancer cells and fluid color.<br />

After conducting the Riwalta reactions [10], the<br />

81 peritoneal effusions were classified in: 29<br />

(35.80%) transudates peritoneal fluid (with low cell<br />

<strong>de</strong>nsity and low protein content, which is usually<br />

accumulated in benign conditions) and 43 (53.08%)<br />

exudate (effusions with high cell <strong>de</strong>nsity and high<br />

protein content, which is accumulated most in<br />

malignant conditions), and 9 (11.11%) mixed,<br />

intermediate peritoneal effusions. Thus, peritoneal<br />

fluids were classified into three groups: group I<br />

(transudates), group II (intermediate, mixed) and<br />

group III (exudates) (Table 2).<br />

Table 2. Distribution of cases after Riwalta reaction<br />

Lots Primary<br />

cancer<br />

Lot I<br />

(n=41)<br />

Lot II<br />

(n=40)<br />

Transudates<br />

(N=29)<br />

Mixed<br />

(N=9)<br />

Exudates<br />

(N=43)<br />

CB 21 3 17<br />

CH (4) 1 1 2<br />

CO (18) 3 0 15<br />

CGI (9) 1 2 6<br />

CM (4) 2 2 0<br />

CP (3) 1 1 1<br />

MP (2) 0 0 2<br />

Since only 26/40, 65% of peritoneal effusions<br />

associated with different type of cancer resulted to<br />

have characters of exudates, and only 21/41, 51.21%<br />

of effusions associated with liver cirrhosis were<br />

shown to be transudates, it follows that, by<br />

conducting the Riwalta reaction, it can <strong>de</strong>termine the<br />

benign or malignant nature of effusions in a<br />

proportion of 58.10% (Fig.6).<br />

Cell smear appearance had a various cells<br />

populations and the quantitative analysis of effusions<br />

was not enough useful in establishing the final<br />

diagnosis. There were observed 7 cell types present<br />

in variable number. Proliferative capacity of tumor<br />

cells - tumor aggressiveness - is an important<br />

161<br />

element in cytology grading of malignancy, and was<br />

quantified by mitosis counting.<br />

Fig 6. The benign or malignant nature of effusions<br />

after conducting the Riwalta reaction<br />

In smears classified as benign, isolated cells<br />

represented 90% of total cells, cell groups recovered<br />

to a rate of 10%. 5% were represented by free<br />

nucleus or cells with damaged cytoplasm.<br />

Mesothelial cells (33%) (33 cells of 100<br />

elements) and lymphocytes (30%) were the majority<br />

cell type in the group of benign peritoneal effusions,<br />

followed by macrophages (17%), polymorphonuclear<br />

leukocytes (PMN) (9%) and erythrocytes (7%).<br />

Average of total number of mitosis foun<strong>de</strong>d in<br />

studied smears was 3mitosis/smears (Table 3).<br />

Cellular composition of effusions foun<strong>de</strong>d to<br />

be suspicious for malignancy was similar with the one<br />

of benign peritoneal effusions: mesothelial cells<br />

(28%) (28 cells of 100 items) and lymphocytes (26%)<br />

were the majority cell type, followed by neutrophils<br />

(13%), atypical cells, suspicious for malignancy<br />

(9%), erythrocytes (9%) and macrophages (7%).<br />

Average of total number of mitosis foun<strong>de</strong>d in<br />

studied smears was 7 mitosis/smears (Table 3).<br />

In the group of patients with malignant cancer,<br />

mesothelial cells represented 29% and erythrocytes<br />

21%, followed by lymphocytes (18%),<br />

polymorphonuclear leukocytes (16%), macrophages<br />

(4%) and malignant cells (4%), average of total<br />

number of mitosis was 9 mitoses / cell smear (Figure<br />

7).


The clinical utility of aditional metho<strong>de</strong>s... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 157-162 (2010)<br />

Tabel 3. The percentage of cellular elements (%)<br />

BE* AE* ME*<br />

Mesothelial<br />

cells<br />

33 28 29<br />

Atipical cells 0 9 0<br />

Malignant cells 0 0 3<br />

erythrocytes, 7 9 21<br />

lymphocytes 30 26 18<br />

PMN 9 13 16<br />

macrophages 17 7 4<br />

mitosis / cell<br />

smear<br />

2 7 9<br />

Average 12,25 12,375 12,5<br />

standard<br />

Deviation<br />

13,15566 9,738546 10,12776<br />

p(t


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

SPATIO-TEMPORAL DYNAMICS OF PHYTOPLANKTON COMPOSITION AND<br />

ABUNDANCE FROM THE ROMANIAN BLACK SEA COAST<br />

Laura BOICENCO<br />

National Institute for Marine Research and Development „Grigore Antipa”<br />

300, Mamaia Bd., Constanta, 900581, Romania, e-mail: boicenco@alpha.rmri.ro<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: Based on more than 2,000 samples collected during 1996-2007, the paper <strong>de</strong>als with the taxonomic<br />

and ecological composition, spatio-temporal <strong>de</strong>velopment of phytoplankton blooms from waters of up to 50 m<br />

<strong>de</strong>pths laying on the Romanian Black Sea. The author i<strong>de</strong>ntified 396 species, varieties and forms, and assessed a<br />

<strong>de</strong>nsity mean varying among 417 and 3,376∙10 3 cells∙l -1 . Bacillariophyta phylum, with a number of 157 taxa and<br />

a <strong>de</strong>nsity mean of minimum 186.4 (in 2000) and maximum 2,311.9∙10 3 cells∙l -1 (in 1997), was the most numerous<br />

(39.6% of the total); Dinoflagellata was the second dominant group, represented in the communities with 85 taxa<br />

(21.5%); <strong>de</strong>nsity means ranged from 9.2 (in 2003) and 225.6∙10 3 cells∙l -1 (in 1997). Groups Chlorophyta and<br />

Cyanobacteria represented only 19.4 and 12.9%, respectively, from the total number of species. Species showing<br />

huge <strong>de</strong>velopments in the reference period were: the diatoms Skeletonema costatum, Cerataulina pelagica,<br />

Nitzschia <strong>de</strong>licatissima, Chaetoceros socialis, Cyclotella caspia and dinoflagellates Prorocentrum minimum,<br />

Heterocapsa triquetra and Scrippsiella trochoi<strong>de</strong>a.<br />

Keywords: taxonomic composition, ecological composition, phytoplankton blooms<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The early 1990s seemed to be a new<br />

beginning for the Black Sea ecosystem. After the<br />

“Mnemiopsis era” <strong>de</strong>scribing the 8 th <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>,<br />

superimposed on the 20 years-long “eutrophication<br />

era” started in the 1970s, signs of improvement of<br />

its ecological state occurred, evi<strong>de</strong>nced by a<br />

reduction of the Danube river nutrient input, a<br />

<strong>de</strong>crease in the frequency of hypoxia conditions, an<br />

increase in fod<strong>de</strong>r zooplankton biomass, and a<br />

drop in M. leidyi’s abundance. The recovery of the<br />

ecosystem was attributed partly to the collapsing<br />

economy and agricultural production, and to some<br />

protective measures taken to control anthropogenic<br />

pollution in all the coastal countries.<br />

Due to their short life cycles and quick<br />

response to changes in their environment, the<br />

phytoplankton was sensitive to these new shifts,<br />

displaying a ten<strong>de</strong>ncy to “normal” status before<br />

eutrophication: <strong>de</strong>creased amplitu<strong>de</strong> and frequency<br />

of blooms, and a qualitative and quantitative<br />

structure similar to the period 1960-1970 rather<br />

than 1980-1990.<br />

So, between 1991 and 1996, only six maximum<br />

<strong>de</strong>nsities, higher than 10 6 cells·l -1 , were registered,<br />

compared to 13 in the1980s; among them, only two<br />

species produced ample bloom events: Prorocentrum<br />

minimum (53.1 and 93.7·10 6 cells·l -1 in the summer of<br />

1991 and 1995) and Microcystis pulverea (60.0·10 6<br />

cells·l -1 in the spring of 1991) [1].<br />

The range of algal groups was different from that<br />

of 1970s and 1980s, but quite similar to that of 1960-<br />

1970 with a reduction of non-diatom bloom amplitu<strong>de</strong><br />

and increase of numerical <strong>de</strong>nsity and especially<br />

biomass of diatoms. The reduction of non-diatoms<br />

coinci<strong>de</strong>d with <strong>de</strong>crease of nutrient stocks, especially<br />

of phosphates, which reached concentrations of 2.55<br />

µM·l -1 in 1991-1996, 2.8 times lower than in 1986-<br />

1990 [1].<br />

During 1995-1996, the Black Sea ecosystem<br />

showed abrupt shifts in all trophic levels, from primary<br />

producers to apex predators. This arose as a<br />

manifestation of concurrent changes in its physical<br />

climate induced by intensive warming of surface<br />

waters, as well as abrupt increases in the mean sea<br />

level and annual mean fresh water flux [2].<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


Spatio-temporal dynamics of phytoplankton composition.../ Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 163-169<br />

The aim of the present paper is to evaluate<br />

the spatio-temporal dynamics of the main<br />

taxonomic groups, and also the main bloomforming<br />

species during 1996-2007.<br />

2. Material and Methods<br />

Biological material was collected during<br />

seasonal surveys carried out within the scientific<br />

NIMRD’s programs, on board RV/STEAUA DE<br />

MARE, in the Romanian coastal waters laying<br />

between 43 0 50’-45 0 05’N and 28 0 50’–30 0 00’E (Fig.<br />

1). 2,018 quantitative samples were collected from<br />

472 stations covering the whole Romanian littoral<br />

at standard <strong>de</strong>pths (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60m),<br />

from the following profiles: Sulina, Mila 9, Sf.<br />

Gheorghe, Zaton, Portiţa, Chituc, Constanta,<br />

Mangalia.<br />

Fig.1. Sampling network<br />

The sampling used a NISKIN bottle; the water<br />

is transferred in 500ml bottles and preserved with<br />

formal<strong>de</strong>hy<strong>de</strong> 4%. In laboratory, the samples were<br />

processed using the MOROZOVA-VODIANITSKAIA<br />

and BODEANU’s methods [3, 4]. After two weeks of<br />

sedimentation, the supernatant liquid is siphoned<br />

off up to about 100ml. The sample is put in a small<br />

jar for another 10 days sedimentation. Before<br />

164<br />

microscopic processing, the sample is again siphoned<br />

off up to 10ml and stirring. 0.1ml of sample is<br />

examined un<strong>de</strong>r a ZEISS inverted microscope; the cells<br />

are counted and i<strong>de</strong>ntified at species or genus and the<br />

numerical <strong>de</strong>nsity is obtained relating the number of<br />

cells to a volume of 1 litre.<br />

Table 1 presents the environmental background<br />

(inorganic nutrients) of the annual phytoplankton<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopments. Phosphates showed a sharp <strong>de</strong>crease<br />

after 1997 down to a level similar to that before<br />

eutrophication. The inorganic total nitrogen<br />

concentrations have steadily <strong>de</strong>pleted ever since the<br />

1980s down to a minimum 9.48µM in 1985 followed<br />

by a relative long period, when these nutrients<br />

presented non-uniform oscillations. Among 1995 and<br />

2005, the levels of total inorganic nitrogen<br />

homogenously <strong>de</strong>creased, the maximum limit being<br />

situated between 10 and 15µM. In recent years their<br />

concentrations have began to increase to more than<br />

20µM, a value similar to that from 1980.<br />

With the exception of Si/N ratio, the molar<br />

ratios are still far by from the normal values,<br />

indicating that trophic anions do still not have optimal<br />

values for the normal <strong>de</strong>velopment of marine<br />

phytoplankton, although they show a <strong>de</strong>creasing<br />

ten<strong>de</strong>ncy. During the last period, the N/P ratio<br />

increased, due to an excessive <strong>de</strong>crease of phosphates<br />

and slight increase of inorganic nitrogen [5].<br />

Table 1. Multiannual mean of surface nutrient<br />

concentrations in coastal waters off Constanta<br />

Period 1983-‘90 1991-‘00 2001-‘05<br />

N-NO3 (µM) 6.90 5.90 7.98<br />

N-NH4 (µM) 5.11 7.06 6.12<br />

P-PO4 (µM) 6.54 1.86 0.49<br />

SiO4 (µM) 11.0 12.6 13.7<br />

3. Results and Discussions<br />

During 1996-2007, 396 microalgae species,<br />

varieties and forms belonging to seven phyla were<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntified in the Romanian Black Sea waters (Fig. 1),<br />

the minimum number of 140 being found in 1996 and<br />

the maximum one in 2004. The most important group<br />

is Bacillariophyta, with 157 species, representing<br />

39.6% of the total; the second place is occupied by<br />

dinoflagellates, with 85 species (21.5%), followed by


Laura Boicenco / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 163-169<br />

chlorophytes – 77 species (19.4%) and<br />

cyanobacteries – 55 species (12.9%); the rest of<br />

phyla (Chrysophyta, Euglenophyta, Cryptophyta),<br />

with 12, 8 and 6 species, respectively, constitute<br />

together only 6.6% of the total (Fig. 2).<br />

Fig. 2. Taxonomic composition.<br />

Ecologically, the phytoplankton represents a<br />

combination of autochthonous species, comprising<br />

euryhaline marine and brackish water forms (218),<br />

and alochthonous forms, comprising fresh-brackish<br />

and fresh water forms (178), reflecting the mixed<br />

marine water masses and riverine fresh waters<br />

which characterise the hydrologic regime of the<br />

Romanian sector.<br />

Table 2. Structure by ecologic groups.<br />

Phylum MarineFreshbrackish brackish<br />

Bacillariophyta 112 45<br />

Dinoflagellata 83 2<br />

Chlorophyta 0 77<br />

Cyanobacteria 9 42<br />

Chrysophyta 8 4<br />

Euglenophyta 2 6<br />

Cryptophyta 4 2<br />

Total 218 178<br />

Diatoms<br />

During 1996-2007 the averaged data for the<br />

whole Romanian littoral waters suggest that the<br />

communities are dominated by diatoms, both in<br />

terms of numeric <strong>de</strong>nsity and biomass. The<br />

multiannual mean of 833.5·10 3 cells·l -1 is 12.2<br />

times higher than dinoflagellates (68.5·10 3<br />

cells·l -1 ). The highest diatoms mean <strong>de</strong>nsity -<br />

2,311.9·10 3 cells·l -1 , achieved in 1997 was 10.2<br />

times higher than that recor<strong>de</strong>d for dinoflagellates<br />

165<br />

in the same year. The diatoms produced their highest<br />

mean <strong>de</strong>nsities during summer; in the summer of 1997,<br />

they excee<strong>de</strong>d 6 million cells per litre. When we were<br />

able to collect samples in winter, e.g. in 1999, we<br />

found out that many diatoms – such as S. costatum, C.<br />

caspia, Ch. socialis, N. tenuirostris began to vegetate<br />

in winter. So, we <strong>de</strong>tected communities very well<br />

constituted, higher than 10 6 cells∙l -1 . In five out of 12<br />

springs investigated (1999, 2003, 2004, 2006 and<br />

2007), the diatom populations were most abundant;<br />

they progressively <strong>de</strong>creased toward summer and<br />

autumn.<br />

Table 3 shows the diatom species with the<br />

highest <strong>de</strong>nsities in the Romanian Black Sea waters,<br />

between 1991 and 2007.<br />

Table 3. The highest <strong>de</strong>nsities of diatoms<br />

(10 6 cells∙l -1 )<br />

1996- 2001-<br />

Species<br />

2000 2007<br />

Cyclotella caspia 10.5 78.6<br />

Skeletonema costatum 24.4 37.3<br />

Nitzschia tenuirostris 1.8 15.5<br />

Cerataulina pelagica 8.2 10.0<br />

Chaetoceros socialis 22.2 7.5<br />

Skeletonema subsalsum 4.4 3.9<br />

N. <strong>de</strong>licatissima 0.6 2.5<br />

Small-sized diatom, Skeletonema costatum is an<br />

omnipresent species in the communities i<strong>de</strong>ntified not<br />

only at the Romanian littoral but in whole Pontic<br />

basin, producing most of the bloom events. Its<br />

maximum level was registered in July 2002, off<br />

Constanta (37.3∙10 6 cells∙l -1 ). Its second outburst<br />

occurred in the shallow waters of Mamaia Bay (where<br />

the sampling is carried out almost weekly); starting in<br />

the second half of March 1998, the phytoplankton<br />

communities were more and more abundant, attaining<br />

the value of 24.3∙10 6 cells·l -1 on March, 31. We have<br />

to remark that the communities from Mamaia Bay<br />

were almost monospecific, being constituted up to<br />

99.8% only by Skeletonema.<br />

Eurythermal and euryhaline species,<br />

Skeletonema vegetates abundant starting from winter,<br />

not only in Mamaia Bay, where usually attain over<br />

5∙10 6 cells∙l -1 , in January-March, but also in <strong>de</strong>eper<br />

waters off Constanta, where its concentrations reached


Spatio-temporal dynamics of phytoplankton composition.../ Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 163-169<br />

3.6∙10 6 cells∙l -1 in January 1999. In the spring of<br />

2006, again in Mamaia Bay, S. costatum produced<br />

two other bloom events: 15∙10 6 cells∙l -1 (April, 25)<br />

and 11∙10 6 cells∙l -1 (May, 4) (Fig. 3), when the<br />

temperatures oscillated from 9.8 to 13.3 0 C and the<br />

salinity <strong>de</strong>creased gradually from 16.53 to 12.64<br />

and 9.04 PSU.<br />

In waters un<strong>de</strong>r the direct influence of the<br />

Danube, Skeletonema often produced <strong>de</strong>nsities<br />

ranged from 1.4 to 6.1∙10 6 cells·l -1 , both in spring<br />

and summer. But in September 1999, its<br />

populations were even richer at all the stations of<br />

the profile: 6.0 (Sulina), 8.1 (Mila 9), 7.7<br />

(Sf.Gheorghe) and 6.3 ∙10 6 cells·l -1 (Portita).<br />

Fig. 3. Long-term evolution of S. costatum blooms.<br />

However, the last blooms produced by<br />

Skeletonema are much lower than those recor<strong>de</strong>d<br />

in the period of maximum eutrophication. A good<br />

indicator of hypereutrophic waters, S.costatum<br />

showed overwhelming populations after 1970; for<br />

instance, between 1983 and 1986, S. costatum<br />

bloomed up to its highest value of 141.4∙10 6 cells∙l -1<br />

in April 1983.<br />

But, the most significant bloom event<br />

registered during the whole study period was<br />

generated by another diatom, Cyclotella caspia in<br />

the shallow waters of Mamaia. On May 3, 2001, it<br />

reached the value of 78.6∙10 6 cells·l -1 , which is 3.2<br />

times higher than S. costatum’s peak; the event was<br />

amplified by the abundant population of<br />

Skeletonema, raising the total <strong>de</strong>nsity up to<br />

84.82∙10 6 cells∙l -1 .<br />

Cyclotella gave another two important<br />

outbursts, but they were 7.6 and 4.0 times lower<br />

than the preceding one: in June 1999 (10.4∙10 6<br />

cells∙l -1 ) at Mamaia, and June 2005 (19.7∙10 6<br />

cells∙l -1 ) at Constanta (Fig. 4). Rich populations<br />

were found also in the northern sector, but never as<br />

high as those found in the southern area; the richest<br />

166<br />

one was i<strong>de</strong>ntified in waters from Sf.Gheorghe site<br />

(6.4∙10 6 cells·l -1 ). Anyway, these highest values are far<br />

from the exceptional <strong>de</strong>velopment recor<strong>de</strong>d by<br />

Cyclotella in 1981 (300∙10 6 cells∙l -1 ) [6].<br />

Fig. 4. Long-term evolution of C. caspia blooms.<br />

Chaetoceros socialis is the third diatom with<br />

frequent occurrence and <strong>de</strong>nsities higher than 100∙10 3<br />

cells·l -1 , but only two blooms were higher than 10∙10 6<br />

cells·l -1 : in June 1997, in front of the Danube Delta<br />

(Mila 9) (15.9∙10 6 cells·l -1 ), and in May 2000, at<br />

Mamaia (22.2∙10 6 cells∙l -1 ) (Fig. 5).<br />

Ch. socialis is a new entry the list of bloomforming<br />

species. During the period 1971-1990, only<br />

Ch. similis f. solitarius <strong>de</strong>veloped large<br />

concentrations: 13.2∙10 6 cells∙l -1 (between 1970 and<br />

1980) and 21.5∙10 6 cells∙l -1 in May 1988.<br />

Fig. 5. Long-term evolution of Ch. socialis blooms.<br />

However, in 1956, 1957 and 1961, SKOLKA cited<br />

Ch. socialis among the species producing some<br />

abundances higher than 10 6 cells·l -1 (its peak of<br />

2.6∙10 6 cells∙l -1 was attained in June 1957); generally it<br />

accompanied other bloom-forming species such as<br />

S. costatum [7].<br />

During the study period, another diatom group,<br />

including Cerataulina pelagica, Nitzschia<br />

<strong>de</strong>licatissima and N. tenuirostris, periodically<br />

contributed to increase the total phytoplankton<br />

abundances, and C. pelagica had a <strong>de</strong>nsity range from<br />

3 to 10 million cells per liter. But only two of


Laura Boicenco / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 163-169<br />

Nitzschia’ species (N. tenuirostris and N.<br />

<strong>de</strong>licatissima) had occurred and had low <strong>de</strong>nsities.<br />

Apart from the N. tenuirostris’ single bloom<br />

produced in July 2006 in Mamaia Bay (15.5∙10 6<br />

cells∙l -1 ), the two species had <strong>de</strong>nsities higher than<br />

10 6 cells∙l -1 only in five and six years, respectively.<br />

N. tenuirostris started to vegetate intensely after<br />

1981, and reached its amplest bloom in the summer<br />

of 1989 - 74.8·10 6 cells·l -1 [6].<br />

Dinoflagellates<br />

With a long-term mean of 68.5∙10 3 cells∙l -1 ,<br />

the dinoflagellates comprised small percentages of<br />

the total phytoplankton, with a maximum of 17%<br />

in 2007; the highest mean <strong>de</strong>nsity was almost<br />

225.6·10 3 cells·l -1 in 1997. However, during two<br />

springs (1998 and 2007) the populations of<br />

dinoflagellates were <strong>de</strong>nser, with a <strong>de</strong>nsity mean of<br />

455.9·10 3 cells·l -1 . Between 1996 and 2007 a few<br />

species had concentrations higher than 10 millions<br />

cells per liter (Table 4) in different areas and years.<br />

Table 4. The highest <strong>de</strong>nsities produced by<br />

dinoflagellates (10 6 cells∙l -1 )<br />

1996- 2001-<br />

Species<br />

2000 2007<br />

Scrippsiella trochoi<strong>de</strong>a 0.3 25.3<br />

Heterocapsa triquetra 13.6 16.0<br />

Gymnodinium cf. aureolum - 10.7<br />

Prorocentrum minimum 10.5 9.0<br />

Mass growth of the Prorocentrum minimum,<br />

causing the water to turn red, was recor<strong>de</strong>d for the<br />

first time in the summer of 1974 along the<br />

Romanian littoral; the phenomenon was repeated in<br />

summers 1975 and 1976. Prorocentrum was the<br />

first dinoflagellate species reacting to the sud<strong>de</strong>n<br />

<strong>de</strong>crease in salinity (monthly average reached 13<br />

PSU, at Constanta) and huge increase in the<br />

concentrations of phosphates and nitrates (18 and<br />

11 times respectively higher than the period 1959-<br />

1960). Presence of such extraordinary blooms had<br />

never been noticed before: 181.5 (1974), 78.7<br />

(1975) and 111.6∙10 6 cells∙l -1 (1976), in the<br />

southern coastal waters, from Navodari to<br />

Mangalia [8]. During the following <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s, when<br />

167<br />

eutrophication got stronger and stronger, up to a<br />

climax from 1981-1990, the species attained even<br />

more prodigious proliferations, up to the value of<br />

807.6∙10 6 cells∙l -1 in July 1987. In fact, no other<br />

species would ever attain such <strong>de</strong>nsities as the<br />

Prorocentrum between 1971 and 1990. In the<br />

following years, the amplitu<strong>de</strong> of Prorocentrum’s<br />

blooms <strong>de</strong>creased, but in July 1995 it reached a<br />

<strong>de</strong>nsity of 93.7∙10 6 cells∙l -1 (Fig. 5), 8.6 times lower<br />

than its overwhelming <strong>de</strong>nsity in July 1987 [1].<br />

Fig. 5. Long-term evolution of P.minimum blooms.<br />

Besi<strong>de</strong> the diatom Skeletonema, P.minimum is<br />

the second most common species in the whole Pontic<br />

basin giving some of the highest blooms, especially in<br />

the NW sector. In our study period, P. minimum<br />

continued to have massive <strong>de</strong>velopments, but much<br />

lower than the previous ones: in June 1999 –10.4∙10 6<br />

cells∙l -1 and July 2001 – 8.93∙10 6 cells∙l -1 , both of them<br />

in Mamaia Bay. Here, up to 2001, during warm<br />

months, the species’ populations frequently excee<strong>de</strong>d<br />

1 million cells per litre; then, the <strong>de</strong>nsities were lower<br />

and lower, sometimes disappearing from samples.<br />

Three other dinoflagellates reached<br />

concentrations higher than 10∙10 6 cells∙l -1 , namely<br />

Heterocapsa triquetra, Scrippsiella trochoi<strong>de</strong>a and<br />

Gymnodinium cf. aureolum (Table 2). After<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopments, reaching a few or ten thousands cells<br />

per litre in the 1970s, H. triquetra and S. trochoi<strong>de</strong>a<br />

came to the list of the bloom-forming species, the first<br />

with a value of 97.6 ∙10 6 cells∙l -1 in the period 1971-<br />

1980, and the second one with a value of 25.8 ∙10 6<br />

cells∙l -1 in the period 1981-1990. After a period (1991-<br />

1996) of insignificant concentrations (highest value of<br />

1.9 ∙10 6 cells∙l -1 ) [1], Heterocapsa again reached high<br />

concentrations: 13.6∙10 6 cells∙l -1 , in May 1998 (at Mila<br />

9) and 10.3∙10 6 cells∙l -1 , in April 2000 (in Mamaia<br />

Bay) (Fig. 6). All along Romanian littoral, but<br />

especially in the northern sector, Heterocapsa<br />

produced substantial <strong>de</strong>nsities, ranging from 2.0 to


Spatio-temporal dynamics of phytoplankton composition.../ Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 163-169<br />

5.0∙10 6 cells∙l -1 . S. trochoi<strong>de</strong>a and Gymnodinium<br />

cf. aureolum had only one single large bloom 25.2<br />

(August 2001) and 10.1∙10 6 cells∙l -1 (April 2007 in<br />

Mamaia Bay), respectively.<br />

Fig. 6. Long-term evolution of H. triquetra<br />

blooms.<br />

Other Groups<br />

Representatives of other groups did not<br />

achieve significant <strong>de</strong>nsities, only sporadically did<br />

some species dominate the communities, and<br />

cyanobacteria were the most numerous comparing<br />

with chlorophytes and chrysophytes. The species<br />

Merismopedia, Microcystis, Gloeocapsa,<br />

Oscilatoria and Aphanizomenon were the<br />

commonest and most frequent cyanobacteries<br />

(Table 4).<br />

Table 4. The highest <strong>de</strong>nsities produced by other<br />

groups (10 6 cells∙l -1 )<br />

Species<br />

1996-<br />

2000<br />

2001-<br />

2007<br />

CYANOBACTERIA<br />

Microcystis orae 272.0<br />

Microcystis pulverea 1.0 26.7<br />

M. aeruginosa 1.5 15.0<br />

Phormidium sp. 27 1.1<br />

CHRYSOPHYTA<br />

Emiliania huxleyi 1.3 1.1<br />

EUGLENOPHYTA<br />

Eutreptia lanowii 2.4 7.4<br />

Three species of Microcystis genus (M.<br />

pulverea, M. aeruginosa and M. orae) produced<br />

maximum <strong>de</strong>nsities between 12.8 and 271.9∙10 6<br />

cells∙l -1 , especially during summer of 2001-2003.<br />

The intense <strong>de</strong>velopment of these three small-sized<br />

168<br />

species of cyanophytes took place un<strong>de</strong>r increased<br />

values of temperature, simultaneously with <strong>de</strong>creased<br />

values of salinity and concomitant with optimal<br />

concentrations of nutrients [8]. The euglenophyte<br />

Eutreptia lanowii had a constant frequency of<br />

occurrence throughout the analyzed period, with<br />

maximum <strong>de</strong>velopments in June 2007 of 7.4∙10 6<br />

cells∙l -1 , in Mamaia Bay, and 2.8∙10 6 cells∙l -1 July 2002<br />

off Constanta.<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

Despite of the mitigation in the pressure exerted<br />

by anthropogenic eutrophication (i.e. <strong>de</strong>pletion of the<br />

inorganic nutrient concentrations down pre 1970<br />

values) and Mnemiopsis’grazing, the signs of the<br />

ecosystem rehabilitation i<strong>de</strong>ntified at the<br />

phytoplankton level occurred after 1990, seem to be<br />

very fragile and labile. That means if the necessary<br />

conditions (sud<strong>de</strong>n salinity reduction, sud<strong>de</strong>n increase<br />

in water temperature, high concentrations of specific<br />

biogenic compounds) are fulfilled, many of<br />

phytoplankters can produce ample blooms.<br />

Some of the species producing frequent and<br />

overwhelming blooms in the previous <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s, carried<br />

on generating significant blooms also in our study<br />

period (i.e. S. costatum, P. minimum, C. caspia etc).<br />

Other species have newly entered the list of bloomforming<br />

species, especially small-sized cyanophyte –<br />

M. pulverea (occurred during the period 1991-1996),<br />

M. orae, M. aeruginosa, Synecocystis sp., Gloeocapsa<br />

crepidinium, but also some large-sized diatoms<br />

Navicula sp., Amphora sp., Tabellaria sp. (after<br />

1996); all of them are alochthonous fresh-brackish<br />

species, introduced into the sea mainly by the Danube<br />

River. M. orae gave a <strong>de</strong>nsity of 272∙10 6 cells∙l -1 in the<br />

summer of 2000, the highest <strong>de</strong>nsity occuring after<br />

1990.<br />

Many times in the past, some of the bloom<br />

events, especially these of huge concentrations, were<br />

followed by fish and invertebrate mass mortalities. We<br />

used to consi<strong>de</strong>r that the species blooming at the<br />

Romanian littoral were dangerous only due to the<br />

negative impact produced as consequence of oxygen<br />

<strong>de</strong>pletion, reaching the threshold for lethal limits for<br />

invertebrates and fish. Such case took place in 1999,<br />

after a relatively high (10.4∙10 6 cells∙l -1 ) but longlasting<br />

bloom (June-July-August) produced by


Laura Boicenco / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 163-169<br />

Cyclotella caspia, in Mamaia Bay. Huge quantities<br />

of adult gobies, sole, plaice and turbot juveniles<br />

were washed up on the beaches or caught in<br />

lethargic condition from the sea by fishermen.<br />

As a matter of fact, HALLEGRAFF (1995)<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>rs that species vegetating in <strong>de</strong>nsities over<br />

5∙10 6 cells∙l -1 are harmful, since phytoplankton<br />

hyperproduction leads to regular violations of the<br />

ecosystem carrying capacity and severe economic<br />

losses to aquaculture, fisheries and tourism<br />

operations [9].<br />

However, some of algal species wi<strong>de</strong>ly<br />

distributed at the Romanian coastal waters, such as<br />

Chaetoceros socialis, C. curvisetus, Dichtyocha<br />

speculum, Ceratium fusus, can seriously damage<br />

fish gills, either mechanically or through<br />

production of hemolytic substances. Other ones,<br />

such as P. minimum, Dinophysis acuta,<br />

D. acuminata, D, sacculus, D. rotundata,<br />

M. aeruginosa are consi<strong>de</strong>red potentially toxic<br />

species, having the capacity to produce potent<br />

toxins, like DSP (diarrheic shellfish poisoning),<br />

that through the food chain could cause a variety of<br />

gastrointestinal illness to humans [9].<br />

The relationship between anthropogenic<br />

activities and changes in phytoplankton<br />

composition and diversity is one of the main<br />

objectives proposed in Harmful Algal Blooms<br />

research. Long time series of phytoplankton<br />

community storage in the NIMRD data base should<br />

be reconsi<strong>de</strong>red related to HAB increase.<br />

5. References<br />

[1] BODEANU N., RUTA G., 1998 – Development<br />

of the planktonic algae in the Romanian<br />

Black Sea sector in 1981- 1996. In<br />

Harmful Algae, B. Reguera, J.Blanco,<br />

L.Fernan<strong>de</strong>z, T. Wyatt (ed.) Vigo, Spain,<br />

1997: 188-191.<br />

[2] OGUZ T., DIPPNER J.W., KAYMAZ Z.,<br />

2006 – Climatic regulation of the Black Sea<br />

hydro-meteorological and ecological<br />

properties at interannual-to-<strong>de</strong>cadal time<br />

sc<strong>ale</strong>. Journal of Marine Systems, 6: 235-<br />

254.<br />

169<br />

[3] BODEANU N., 1987/1988 - Structure and<br />

dynamics of unicellular algal flora in the<br />

Romanian littoral of the Black Sea. Cercetari<br />

Marine, 20–21: 19–250.<br />

[4] MOROZOVA-VODIANITKAIA N.V., 1954 -<br />

The Black Sea phytoplankton, Tr. Sevastopol.<br />

Biol., 8: 11-99 (in Russian).<br />

[5] BSC, 2008. State of the Environment of the<br />

Black Sea (2001-2006/7). Edited by Temel<br />

Oguz. Publications of the Commission on the<br />

Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution<br />

(BSC) 2008-3, Istanbul, Turkey: 23-49.<br />

[6] SKOLKA H.V., 1967 – Consi<strong>de</strong>raţii asupra<br />

variaţiilor calitative <strong>şi</strong> cantitative <strong>ale</strong><br />

fitoplanctonului litoralului românesc al Mării<br />

Negre. Ecologie Marină, Vol. 2: 193-293.<br />

[7] BODEANU N., ROBAN A., USURELU M.,<br />

1981 – Elemente privind structura, dinamica <strong>şi</strong><br />

producţia fitoplanctonului <strong>de</strong> la litoralul<br />

românesc al Mării Negre în perioada 1972-<br />

1977). Producţia <strong>şi</strong> productivitatea<br />

ecosistemelor acvatice. N. Botnariuc ed., Ed.<br />

Acad. Rom., Bucureşti: 42-50.<br />

[8] BODEANU N., ANDREI C., BOICENCO L.,<br />

POPA L.,. SBURLEA A, 2004 – A new<br />

trend of the phytoplankton structure and<br />

dynamics in the Romanian marine waters.<br />

Cercetari Marine, 35: 77-86.<br />

[9] VELIKOVA V., MONCHEVA S.,. PETROVA<br />

D, 1999 – Phytoplankton dynamics and red<br />

ti<strong>de</strong>s (1987-1997) in the Bulgarian Black Sea.<br />

Wat. Sci. Tech., Vol. 39, No. 8: 27-36.


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

ASPECTS REGARDING THE BIODIVERSITY OF<br />

THE AQUATIC AND SEMI AQUATIC HETEROPTERA IN THE LAKES<br />

SITUATED IN THE MIDDLE BASIN OF THE OLT RIVER<br />

Daniela Minodora ILIE<br />

“Lucian Blaga” University, School of Sciences, Departament of Ecology and Environmental Protection,<br />

5-7 Dr. I. Raţiu Street, 550012, Sibiu, Romania<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: The present work analyzes the bio diversity of the aquatic and semi aquatic heteroptera belonging to<br />

four habitats, respectively lakes situated within the middle basin of the Olt River. From the collected biological<br />

material, consisting of 724 samples there were i<strong>de</strong>ntified 20 species of aquatic and semi aquatic heteroptera. We<br />

want to mention the presence of the species Paracorixa concinna in the lake in Cincşor, here being the single and<br />

only one appearance of this species till now in the basin of the Olt River. The different conditions of the<br />

researched habitats are to be seen in the structure of the communities of aquatic and semi aquatic heteroptera.<br />

The similitu<strong>de</strong> among the established communities is a quite a reduced one.<br />

Keywords: aquatic and semi aquatic heteroptera fauna, communities analysis, the middle basin of the Olt<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The aquatic and semi aquatic heteroptera lives<br />

in a great variety of habitats, from temporary swamps<br />

to big lakes, from brooks to small and big rivers, from<br />

continental waters to the surface of the oceans. The<br />

aquatic and semi aquatic heteroptera are consumers<br />

of the 2 nd <strong>de</strong>gree (the food base consisting of both<br />

<strong>de</strong>ad and alive prey).<br />

The present work proposes to evaluate the bio<br />

diversity of the communities of aquatic and semi<br />

aquatic heteroptera from the researched lakes that are<br />

situated in the following units of relief: Perşani<br />

Mountains, Făgăraş Mountanns and Hârtibaciu<br />

Plateau. The lakes are presented as follows:<br />

SO1: Bottomless Lake (Mateiaş)<br />

The lake is situated in Perşani Mountains,<br />

having the following coordinates: 45 0 59’ 08’’ N, 25 0<br />

20’<br />

20’’ E, at an altitu<strong>de</strong> of 522m. It is to be found on<br />

the left slope of the Olt River, being placed in the<br />

storages of the terrace allowing in this way the supply<br />

of the lake from the phreatic water.<br />

The lake, having a surface of approximately<br />

870m 2<br />

is surroun<strong>de</strong>d by willows. Phragmites<br />

communis and Typha latifolia covers about 5% from<br />

the banks area. The vegetation above and un<strong>de</strong>r the<br />

water is about 55-60% of the surface of the lake.<br />

There are to be found Lemna minor, L. trisulca,<br />

Spyrogyra sp., and also Ceratophyllum <strong>de</strong>mersum,<br />

Myriophyllum spicatum (a little). It is interesting to<br />

be mentioned the appearance in this station of the<br />

species Sagittaria latifolia and Potamogeton lucens<br />

that are seldom met in the middle basin of the Olt.<br />

SO2: Bâlea Lake<br />

The geographic coordinates are: 45 0 36’ 10’’ N,<br />

24 0 36’ 49’’E, at an altitu<strong>de</strong> of 2036m.<br />

It is a typical glacier lake sheltered in the so<br />

called Bâlea bucket, nearby the separating limit<br />

between the glacial circle and the former glacial<br />

valley. There is a mixed supply, this being the spring<br />

of the river Bâlea.<br />

The lake has a surface of 4.6 ha and a maximum<br />

<strong>de</strong>pth of 11.35.<br />

S03: Cincşor<br />

The lake is situated in the Hârtibaciu Plateau,<br />

having the geographic coordinates as follows: 45 0 49’<br />

36’’ N, 24 0 49’55’’ E, at an altitu<strong>de</strong> of 422m. It is an<br />

abandoned mean<strong>de</strong>r of the Olt River, which when<br />

there are big flood keeps in touch with the actual<br />

course of the river, being situated in its major<br />

riverbed. The supply of the lake is both from<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rground as well as superficial.<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


Aspects regarding the biodiversity... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 171-175 (2010)<br />

The banks of the river are covered with willows<br />

(Salix alba, S. triandra, S. fragilis), which make the<br />

banks more stable and also give shadow to the water.<br />

SO4: Netuş<br />

The Netuş Lake is situated in the Hârtibaciu<br />

Plateau having the coordinates as follows: 46 0 03’<br />

55’’ N, 24 0 47’ 55’’ E, at an altitu<strong>de</strong> of 484m.<br />

The lake was arranged by people, its purpose<br />

being to reduce the flood. It also has a fish breeding<br />

interest, being placed in the major riverbed of the<br />

Hârtibaciu River. The vegetation is un<strong>de</strong>veloped.<br />

2. Material and Methods<br />

The biologic material was gathered during<br />

September-October 2001, September 2002, August<br />

and September 2004, From three stations there were<br />

gathered two samples: in September and October<br />

2001 from SO!, in September 2002 and August 2004<br />

from SO2, in September and October 2001 from<br />

SO3. From the station SO4 there was done only one<br />

gathering (October 2004). For the i<strong>de</strong>ntification of<br />

the species we used the <strong>de</strong>termination key of the<br />

following authors: [1], [2], and [3].<br />

There was calculated the relative abundance of<br />

each and every species from the researched habitats,<br />

diversity in<strong>de</strong>xes ά - Marg<strong>ale</strong>f (for general aspects,<br />

such as the number of species and the number of<br />

individuals) and Lloyd-Ghelardi (for the evaluation of<br />

heterogeneity) – and the indicator of percentage<br />

similitu<strong>de</strong> Renkonen, in accordance with [4].<br />

3. Results and Discussions<br />

As a result of the gatherings done during the<br />

periods mentioned before we i<strong>de</strong>ntified a number of<br />

20 species, from which 13 species are aquatic<br />

heteroptera (Heteroptera: Nepomorpha) and 7 species<br />

are semi aquatic heteroptera (Heteroptera:<br />

Gerromorpha), belonging to 9 families, presented in a<br />

number of 724 samples (table 1).<br />

The Corixidae family is the best represented<br />

taking into account the number of species (8 species),<br />

but consi<strong>de</strong>ring the number of the gathered<br />

individuals the Naucoridae family is on the first place<br />

(202 samples). At Mateiaş (SO1) we i<strong>de</strong>ntified 17<br />

species representing 50% from the total number of<br />

species that were gathered in the middle basin of the<br />

172<br />

river Olt (Ilie, 2009). Here is the only station where<br />

appeared the species Ilyocoris cimicoi<strong>de</strong>s, its<br />

presence being linked to the un<strong>de</strong>r water vegetation.<br />

Other species of aquatic heteroptera (Sigara striata,<br />

Sigara iactans, Notonecta glauca, Plea minutissima)<br />

are also well represented from the same reason. On<br />

the other si<strong>de</strong>, the vegetation above the water is<br />

favorable for the semi aquatic species (Microvelia<br />

reticulata, Mesovelia furcata and Mesovelia<br />

vittigera).<br />

The community of the aquatic and semi aquatic<br />

heteroptera from Mateiaş is <strong>de</strong>fined by high values of<br />

the relative abundance of the species Ilyocoris<br />

cimicoi<strong>de</strong>s (A=30.31%), Microvelia reticulata<br />

(A=20.85%), Gerris argentatus (A=16.62%) and<br />

Sigara striata (A=12.54%) and values less than 10%<br />

for the other species. There is to be noticed an<br />

equilibrate structure of the heteroptera community as<br />

two species of aquatic heteroptera and respectively<br />

two species of semi aquatic heteroptera represents<br />

about 40% from the total of the community. On<br />

assembly the aquatic heteroptera represent 60% and<br />

the semi aquatic heteroptera about 40% from the<br />

heteroptera community in the lake in Mateiaş (in the<br />

terms of relative abundance). The species Notonecta<br />

glauca is represented by an average number of<br />

individuals, the dimensions of the population being<br />

<strong>de</strong>termined by the big size and the predator behavior,<br />

which is extremely active.<br />

At the Bâlea Lake (SO2) we i<strong>de</strong>ntified only two<br />

species of heteroptera although there was done the<br />

some number of gatherings, the habitat being of the<br />

same kind (natural lake) and the relief unit the same,<br />

namely mountain. This fact is a result of the great<br />

differences of altitu<strong>de</strong>, which implies climate<br />

differences (especially the temperature, on which<br />

<strong>de</strong>pends the existence and the <strong>de</strong>velopment of the<br />

insects) as well as the vegetation (this being mainly a<br />

shelter against the predators). There was also noticed<br />

the fact that the species that were present in the Bâlea<br />

Lake are to be found in the Mateiaş Lake, too.<br />

At Cincşor (SO3) there were i<strong>de</strong>ntified 10<br />

species of aquatic and semi aquatic heteroptera. The<br />

most of the species belong to Corixidae family (4<br />

species). The other families are represented by one or<br />

maximum two species.<br />

In the aquatic and semi aquatic heteroptera<br />

community of the Cincşor Lake, Micronecta scholtzi


Daniela Minodora Ilie / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 171-175 (2010)<br />

registered by far the highest value of the relative Table 3. The values of the Renkonen in<strong>de</strong>x<br />

abundance (A=46.00%). Some authors consi<strong>de</strong>red<br />

important the fact that fish eat several species of<br />

heteroptera, especially Corixidae, reducing in this<br />

way their populations [5]. The populations of the<br />

species Micronecta scholtzi were noticed in the shore<br />

S01- S01- S01- S02- S02- S03-<br />

S02 S03 S04 S03 S04 S04<br />

R. 23.87 19.40 21.00 0.00 22.22 0.00<br />

The similitu<strong>de</strong> between the aquatic and semi<br />

aquatic heteroptera communities in the 4 habitats was<br />

area of the aquatic habitat, a shadowed area and<br />

without un<strong>de</strong>rwater plants, having a reduced <strong>de</strong>pth,<br />

which is not favorable for fish, this being the<br />

explanation of the abundance of this species in the<br />

heteroptera community. We also want to notice the<br />

presence of the species Paracorixa concinna, here<br />

being the only once it was registered till now in the<br />

basin of the Olt River [6].<br />

At Netuş (SO4) there were i<strong>de</strong>ntified two<br />

species of semi aquatic heteroptera: Gerris lacustris,<br />

being collected 7 individuals and Microvelia<br />

reticulata, 2 individuals being collected. In this case<br />

the number of species is a much reduced one because<br />

the ecologic conditions are not proper for these<br />

heteroptera. We want to notice that both species are<br />

semi aquatic ones, these being less sensitive than the<br />

aquatic species regarding the volume and the <strong>de</strong>nsity<br />

of the un<strong>de</strong>rwater as well as the floating vegetation.<br />

Table 2. The values of the diversity in<strong>de</strong>xes ά<br />

obtained for every collecting station<br />

In<strong>de</strong>x / Station S01 S02 S03 S04<br />

Marg<strong>ale</strong>f 2.46<br />

3<br />

Lloyd-Ghelardi 0.68<br />

6<br />

0.91<br />

0<br />

0.91<br />

8<br />

2.30<br />

1<br />

0.71<br />

3<br />

0.45<br />

5<br />

0.76<br />

4<br />

The values of Marg<strong>ale</strong>f in<strong>de</strong>x are quite high for<br />

the habitats SO1 (2.463) and SO3 (2.301)<br />

respectively low for the habitats SO2 (0.910) and<br />

SO4 (0.455) (table 2). The higher values of the in<strong>de</strong>x<br />

show that there were better conditions in the habitat<br />

for the heteroptera species.<br />

The Lloyd-Ghelardi in<strong>de</strong>x, varying between 0<br />

and 1, shows for the researched habitats a relatively<br />

homogenous repartition of the individuals on the<br />

species, representing around 70% of the optimum<br />

value. SO2 is an exception having a higher value<br />

because of the i<strong>de</strong>ntification of individuals number<br />

closed to the species number.<br />

173<br />

established having as a base the Renkonen in<strong>de</strong>x,<br />

calculated with data of relative abundance of the<br />

species. It came out that there was a quite low<br />

similitu<strong>de</strong> (table 3).<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

There were i<strong>de</strong>ntified 20 species, from which<br />

we noticed the species Paracorixa concinna, at<br />

Cincşor being the only registration in the basin of the<br />

Olt River.<br />

The number of the i<strong>de</strong>ntified species in every<br />

habitat differs quite a lot (among 2-17 species) as<br />

well as the abundances of different species within the<br />

communities that establish them in those habitats (for<br />

example in SO1, the only station where the species<br />

Ilyocoris cimicoi<strong>de</strong>s was present, this being also the<br />

most abundant; in SO3 Micronecta sholtzi registered<br />

by far the highest value of the relative abundance).<br />

These show the variety of the conditions that are<br />

existent in those lakes; for the aquatic and semi<br />

aquatic heteroptera the quality of the habitats is<br />

connected with the altitu<strong>de</strong>, damming, the<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment of the aquatic vegetation, the fish<br />

population, etc. The similitu<strong>de</strong> between the<br />

communities of aquatic and semi aquatic heteroptera<br />

established in those 4 habitats is quite a low one.<br />

5. References<br />

[1] DAVIDEANU, ANA, 1999. Contribuţii la studiul<br />

heteropterelor acvatice din România, Teza <strong>de</strong><br />

doctorat, Univ. ”Al. I. Cuza”, Ia<strong>şi</strong>, 427 pp.<br />

[2] JANSSON, A., 1986. The Corixidae (Heteroptera)<br />

of Europe and some adjacent regions, Acta Entom.<br />

Fennica, 47: 1-92.<br />

[3] POISSON, R., 1957. Hétéroptères aquatiques<br />

(Faune <strong>de</strong> France), 61: 1-263.<br />

[4] SÎRBU, I., BENEDEK ANA MARIA, 2004.<br />

Ecologie practică, Univ. Lucian Blaga, Sibiu, 1-<br />

264.


Aspects regarding the biodiversity... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 171-175 (2010)<br />

[5] PAPÁČEK, M., 2001. Small aquatic and ripicolous<br />

bugs (Heteroptera: Nepomorpha) as predators and<br />

prey, Eur. J. Entomol., 98: 1-12.<br />

[6] ILIE, DANIELA MINODORA, 2009.<br />

Heteropterele acvatice <strong>şi</strong> semiacvatice din<br />

bazinul mijlociu al Oltului, Ed. Altip, Alba-Iulia,<br />

1-279.<br />

174


Daniela Minodora Ilie / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 171-175 (2010)<br />

Table 1. The i<strong>de</strong>ntified species of aquatic and semi aquatic heteroptera from the researched habitats and the<br />

values of the relative abundance<br />

Gathering Station S01 S02 S03 S04<br />

Taxon<br />

Individuals<br />

number<br />

A% Individuals<br />

number<br />

174<br />

A% Individuals<br />

number<br />

A% Individuals<br />

number<br />

Fam. Gerridae<br />

Gerris argentatus 110 16,62 5 10,00<br />

Gerris<br />

odontogaster 3 0,45<br />

Gerris lacustris 1 0,15 7 77,78<br />

Fam. Veliidae<br />

Microvelia<br />

reticulata 138 20,85 1 33,33 2 22,22<br />

Fam.<br />

Hydrometridae<br />

Hydrometra<br />

stagnorum 1 0,15 11 22,00<br />

Fam<br />

Mesoveliidae<br />

Mesovelia furcata 21 3,17 4 8,00<br />

Mesovelia vitigera 10 1,51 1 2,00<br />

Fam. Corixidae<br />

Micronecta<br />

(Dichaetonecta)<br />

scholtzi 23 46,00<br />

Corixa punctata 6 0,91<br />

Hesperocorixa<br />

linnaei 2 0,30<br />

Paracorixa<br />

concinna 1 2,00<br />

Sigara<br />

(Retrocorixa)<br />

limitata 1 0,15<br />

Sigara (Sigara)<br />

striata 83 12,54<br />

Sigara (Subsigara)<br />

iactans 45 6,80 1 2,00<br />

Sigara<br />

(Vermicorixa)<br />

lateralis 1 2,00<br />

Fam. Naucoridae<br />

Ilyocoris<br />

cimicoi<strong>de</strong>s 202 30,51<br />

Fam. Nepidae<br />

Nepa cinerea 2 0,30 1 2,00<br />

Fam.<br />

Notonectidae<br />

A%


Aspects regarding the biodiversity... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 171-175 (2010)<br />

Notonecta viridis 2 0,30<br />

Notonecta glauca<br />

Fam. Pleidae<br />

20 3,02 2 66,67<br />

Plea minutissima<br />

Individuals<br />

15 2,27 2 4,00<br />

number per<br />

662 3 50 9<br />

gathering station<br />

Species number<br />

per gathering<br />

station<br />

17 2 10 2<br />

175


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

PROGRAM OF PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF FUNGUS INFESTATION OF<br />

GRAIN AND FODDER , HUMAN AND ANIMAL PROTECTION AGAINST<br />

MYCOTOXINS<br />

drd.ing. Ioan Aurel POP*, conf. dr. Augustin CURTICĂPEAN**, drd.ing. Alin GULEA*, dr. Cornel PODAR*,<br />

ing. Iustina LOBONTIU*.<br />

* Staţiunea <strong>de</strong> Cercetare Dezvoltare penru Creşterea Bovinelor Mureş,<br />

str. Principală 1227, Sângeorgiu <strong>de</strong> Mureş, jud Mureş.<br />

** Universitatea <strong>de</strong> Medicină <strong>şi</strong> Farmacie Târgu Mureş<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: mycotoxins contained in forages may yield to cause different health issues on farm livestock as<br />

<strong>de</strong>creasing the forage intake and bioconversion, serious illness and <strong>de</strong>ath. Food and Agriculture Organization<br />

(FAO) appreciates on global level that 25% of agricultural products are contaminated with mycotoxins. These<br />

compounds contaminate feeds before and after harvesting. Food quality monitoring on each stage, especially due<br />

to it’s fungal potential risk is very important for the <strong>de</strong>velopment of antifungal strategies adapted to local<br />

conditions. Thus, through a research project witch involves the quantification of mycotoxins concentrations from<br />

feed and food samples taken from different farms located in Central Region of Transylvania we managed to<br />

<strong>de</strong>velop a new method of <strong>de</strong>tection and quantification of three mycotoxins. The paper work presents a part of<br />

activities performed in a research project and comprises their results on preventing and control of funguses and<br />

mycotoxins.<br />

Keywords: mycotoxins, fungus, crops, methods.<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Food safety has become one of the directions<br />

very important area to protect and improve the<br />

quality of life. To ensure all elements contributing to<br />

the increase of consumer protection and food quality,<br />

<strong>de</strong>velop new methods of control, as simple, low<br />

resource consuming, while used in normal conditions<br />

[1]. Thus, eliminating sources of toxic advanced<br />

occurring in food composition is a major goal. One<br />

such source is the species of fungi producing<br />

mycotoxins, which are found in most foods of plant<br />

origin whose storage / storage is ina<strong>de</strong>quate, but<br />

worse is that we find and their metabolites in animal<br />

products, products from infested feeding.<br />

Monitoring primary storage conditions, and<br />

assessment on a representative sample of infestation<br />

by specific analysis will recommend specific methods<br />

of prevention / treatment of <strong>de</strong>veloping adverse<br />

effects of mycotoxins in crops.<br />

In a research project has <strong>de</strong>veloped a new<br />

method for <strong>de</strong>tection and quantification of three<br />

mycotoxins for monitoring the infection status of feed<br />

and food grain with mycotoxins in various units and<br />

areas located in Region Development Centru. [2]<br />

The paper also presents results of experiments:<br />

- Study the behavior of wheat, barley, tritic<strong>ale</strong>s<br />

and corn hybrids tested in comparative culture from<br />

the years 2008, 2009 from SCDCB Mures and their<br />

hierarchy according to their resistance to disease<br />

attack;<br />

- Testing of eight plant protection products for<br />

disease prevention and control in cereals in climatic<br />

conditions in 2009 and monitoring the behavior of<br />

fungici<strong>de</strong>s in the production.<br />

2. Material and Methods<br />

Thurough the research project "Complex<br />

program of prevention and control of fungus<br />

infestation for grain and fod<strong>de</strong>r for providing animal<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


Program of prevention and control of fungus… / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 177-180 (2010)<br />

wealth and consumer protection’ has achieved a<br />

status of monitoring infestation of feed and food<br />

grain with mycotoxins in various units and sectors<br />

located in the Development Region Center. Action<br />

was initiated in early June in a maximum period of<br />

susceptibility to the inci<strong>de</strong>nce of mycotoxins <strong>de</strong>posit<br />

being ma<strong>de</strong> by the team of researchers from SCDCB<br />

Mures Tg Mures and SC AGROFITOPLANT<br />

PharmacyLtd.<br />

Sampling activity was ma<strong>de</strong> taking account of<br />

Regulation (EC) NO. 401/2006 laying down the<br />

procedures for sampling and analysis methods for<br />

official control of mycotoxins in food.<br />

In total 180 samples were taken from 44 production<br />

units, which have in operation a total: 14 450 ha of<br />

arable land, 8960 cattle, 29,170 porcine, 36,640<br />

birds, 8792 sheep. Average area of farms covered<br />

operating is 328 hectares.<br />

Of the total samples: 145 samples were<br />

concentrated (maize grain, flour, PVM's, milk<br />

pow<strong>de</strong>r) and 35 samples of forage (silage, half hay,<br />

hay, grains, beet chips, etc.). [1]<br />

The quantification of mycotoxins in the<br />

samples, at the UMF Mures (Mures University of<br />

Medicine and Pharmacy) has <strong>de</strong>veloped a new<br />

method to quantify the simultaneous separation of<br />

mycotoxins by liquid chromatography HPLC using a<br />

DIONEX Ultimate 3000 with UV <strong>de</strong>tection<br />

simultaneously on different channels. Optimization<br />

method was performed to <strong>de</strong>termine simultaneously,<br />

using an ordinary system, more relevant mycotoxins<br />

present in samples of feed corn stored for eight<br />

months.<br />

Based on production and behavior have<br />

established multi fenophasic comparative cultural<br />

components subject to this project, DC M01 and M02<br />

with wheat varieties, tritic<strong>ale</strong> and barley. (Table 1)<br />

Table 1. Crop ranking regarding yield DON and<br />

ZON.<br />

Specia/Soiu<br />

l<br />

Producti<br />

a medie<br />

(Kg/ha) Isc<br />

Ierarh<br />

i<br />

zare<br />

I GRAU 6920<br />

Ariesan(Mt 6780,9 120,20 V<br />

7243,5 161,01 I<br />

178<br />

II<br />

Ar<strong>de</strong>al 1<br />

Magistral 7159,1 130,59 III<br />

Renan 6536,0 114,56 VI<br />

Exotic 7047,9 133,56 II<br />

Gasparom 7070,5 122,90 IV<br />

Turda<br />

14/98 6671,0 105,98 VIII<br />

Apullum 6851,8 110,33 VII<br />

TRITICAL<br />

E 7699<br />

Plai(Mt) 7798,7 120,20 III<br />

Titan 7971,4 123,85 II<br />

Trilstar 7501,8 104,89 V<br />

Stil 7590,3 117,51 IV<br />

00474T1-1 7632,1 125,30 I<br />

II ORZ 6481<br />

Gerlac(Mt) 6570,8 110,00 I<br />

Regal 6683,2 97,12 III<br />

Plaisant 6189,1 98,81 II<br />

For testing resistance to major pests and<br />

diseases of maize hybrids grown in the area was<br />

established in late April (2008.2009) a crop of corn<br />

hybrids compared with 24 (S = 1000 m) in the<br />

experimental field of the resort located in Sg Mures.<br />

The main observations ma<strong>de</strong>: plant vigor, flowering<br />

time, date of silk, drought resistance,<br />

Helminthosporium sp., Puccini sp., Ustillago sp.<br />

Attack of Fusarium sp., The number of sterile plants,<br />

the number of broken and fallen plants, resistance to<br />

attack pest and grain production.<br />

The content <strong>de</strong>termination of mycotoxins was<br />

performed at UMF Targu Mures (University of<br />

Medicine and Pharmacy. Mures) SPC Mures (Mures<br />

Public Health Center) Promovert laboratories in<br />

Champagne, France (company Bayer). [1]<br />

3. Results and Discussions<br />

Precision method for <strong>de</strong>termining meets the<br />

minimum relative standard <strong>de</strong>viation (with values in a<br />

field of ± 15%) for quality control samples measured


Ioan Aurel Pop et al. / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 177-180 (2010)<br />

in both samples the same day and comparisons<br />

between samples from different days.<br />

Minimum limits of quantification for the three<br />

analytes / mycotoxins (2.88 ng / mL AflaB1, 2.88 ng<br />

/ mL respectively OchrA 14.4 ng / mL Zeara) met the<br />

requirements of precision and accuracy so that the<br />

relative standard <strong>de</strong>viation to be inclu<strong>de</strong>d in a field ±<br />

20% for both measurements on the same day as well<br />

as those performed on different days and the<br />

difference between mean calculated and nominal<br />

values (BIAS%) is also contained in a maximum field<br />

of ± 20%.<br />

Records on the evi<strong>de</strong>nce provi<strong>de</strong>d by corn and<br />

also on samples from various forage plants show an<br />

infestation of their importance to all three classes of<br />

mycotoxins, so Aflatoxin B1 and Ochratoxin A with<br />

zear<strong>ale</strong>none. Infestation levels are relatively high,<br />

regulated levels overruns are much more frequent and<br />

more significant if the first two Mycotoxins -<br />

Aflatoxin B1 respectively Ochratoxin A. Thus, the<br />

calculated values for concentrations of mycotoxin<br />

present in almost all unknown samples analyzed<br />

exceed permissible concentrations and regulated at<br />

European level. [2]<br />

High levels of mycotoxins found in animal feed<br />

and is probably due to the chosen period when this<br />

work started in early June, during which cereal stocks<br />

are running, close grain with a one year old storage<br />

warehouses before the process is Cleaning for storing<br />

grain harvest.<br />

Using production data obtained, the<br />

observations on different varieties fenophase attack<br />

on disease resistance, <strong>de</strong>oxyniv<strong>ale</strong>nol and<br />

zear<strong>ale</strong>none content in samples taken at harvest 16<br />

varieties of cereals were ranked using a synthetic<br />

in<strong>de</strong>x calculated Isc this.<br />

Results show that there are differences between<br />

varieties in terms of mycotoxins but not the values<br />

obtained exceeding the maximum allowed by law<br />

(1250 ng / g DON, and 100 ng / g Zon).<br />

Maize, based on production, moisture at<br />

harvest, percentage of plants broken and fallen and<br />

observations of vegetation during the attack on<br />

disease resistance of a synthetic in<strong>de</strong>x was calculated<br />

to ease the process generally ranking of cultivars.<br />

Results of tests carried out in laboratories SC<br />

Bayer SRL Promovert in Champagne, France<br />

reinforce the lessons learned so far. Of the seven<br />

179<br />

variants examined only version control - untreated<br />

with fungici<strong>de</strong> containing <strong>de</strong>oxyniv<strong>ale</strong>nol was above<br />

the limit of quantitation of 220 ng / g, respectively<br />

440 ng / g value in joining the legal permissible limit<br />

of 1250 ng / g DON. [1]<br />

% spice sanatoase<br />

101<br />

100<br />

99<br />

98<br />

97<br />

96<br />

95<br />

94<br />

93<br />

92<br />

95<br />

Martor<br />

netratat<br />

100 100<br />

Folicur Solo<br />

250 EW<br />

97<br />

100<br />

Tilt 250 EW Duett Ultra<br />

Produsul<br />

Prosaro 250<br />

EC<br />

97 97<br />

Nativo 300<br />

SC<br />

Falcon 460<br />

EC<br />

Fig. 1. Fungici<strong>de</strong>s effect in Fusarium removal<br />

from Ariesat wheat variety at Tg Mures.<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

Interpreted data show that the current<br />

methodology for preparing samples for analysis /<br />

quantification of mycotoxin content of substances of<br />

category has limits too generous. Thus, extraction of<br />

these substances (of which there are complex<br />

matrices) respecting the standardized methods, shows<br />

a lower sensitivity, which leads to highlighting of<br />

quantities / concentrations lower than actual. .[2]<br />

The existence of evi<strong>de</strong>nce over the maximum<br />

levels allowable by law certify the importance of this<br />

research and the need for a regional research<br />

antimycotic.<br />

Climatic conditions of the agricultural year 2008<br />

- 2009, characterized by high temperatures<br />

throughout the crop growing season and low rainfall<br />

than -114 mm limited attack foliar and ear diseases,<br />

and the effect of crop protection products was not<br />

very visible. For further research would require more<br />

years of study to catch different climates.<br />

Large assortment of hybrid corn study allows<br />

farmers to select hybrids with high production<br />

potential and adaptability to the conditions of the<br />

area. To limit the attack of diseases and in particular<br />

Fusarium in seed must be transmitted primarily by<br />

limiting attack Pyrausta which facilitates infection


Program of prevention and control of fungus… / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 177-180 (2010)<br />

how damaging fungal diseases of plants and causes<br />

breaking of preventing <strong>de</strong>ployment of mechanized<br />

harvesting in good condition. [3]<br />

5. References<br />

[1] POP I., GULEA A., CURTICĂPEAN A.,<br />

PODAR C. , 2009 - Program complex <strong>de</strong><br />

prevenire <strong>şi</strong> combatere a infestării cu miceţi la<br />

cere<strong>ale</strong> <strong>şi</strong> plante furajere pentru asigurarea<br />

bunăstǎrii anim<strong>ale</strong>lor <strong>şi</strong> protecţia<br />

consumatorilor, Raport <strong>de</strong> progres Transa a II-a.<br />

[2] A. CURTICĂPEAN, FELICIA TOMA,<br />

MONICA TARCEA, MANUELA<br />

CURTICĂPEAN, VICTOR SĂMĂRGHITAN,<br />

I. POP, A. GULEA, 2009 - Optimizarea unei<br />

meto<strong>de</strong> HPLC <strong>de</strong> separare <strong>şi</strong> <strong>de</strong>terminarea<br />

simultană a unor micotoxine din porumb,- Noi<br />

tendinţe <strong>şi</strong> strategii in chimia materi<strong>ale</strong>lor<br />

avansate. Institutul <strong>de</strong> Chimie Timişoara,<br />

Timişoara.<br />

[3] Pop I., Gulea A., Curticăpean A., Podar Cornel,<br />

2009 - ‚Program complex <strong>de</strong> prevenire <strong>şi</strong><br />

combatere a infestării cu miceţi la cere<strong>ale</strong> <strong>şi</strong><br />

plante furajere pentru asigurarea bunăstǎrii<br />

anim<strong>ale</strong>lor <strong>şi</strong> protecţia consumatorilor’- Raport<br />

<strong>de</strong> progres Transa I.<br />

180


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

DATA ON THE DYNAMICS OF SOME MICROBIAL GROUPS IN SOILS<br />

WITH DIFFERENT TROPHIC STATUS IN CUMPĂNA REGION (DOBROUDJA)<br />

Elena DELCĂ<br />

Ovidius University of Constanţa, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Agricultural Sciences<br />

Mamaia Avenue, No. 124, Constanţa, 900527, Romania,<br />

Doctoral school Biology, Specialization Ecology<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: The aim of paper was to assess the effect of administration of organic amendments on the dynamics of<br />

the abundance of microbial groups significant in nutrient cycling in soils. Abundance of total culturable bacteria<br />

ranged from 19.93x10 6 UFC/g dry soil, to 501.79x10 6 UFC/g dry soil. When soil was supplemented with manure<br />

microbial <strong>de</strong>nsity showed a significant increase 501.79x10 6 UFC/g dry soil compared with control variant.<br />

Bacterial <strong>de</strong>nsity increased significantly as value, too, following the administration of specific biofertilizers<br />

(Biovin, Bactofil Professional; Mycos Green), up to 142.13 x106UFC/g dry soil. Inorganic fertilizers did not<br />

have a positive effect on microbial <strong>de</strong>nsity values, being more or less similar to those reported for the control.<br />

Our preliminary data show that organic amendments with complex composition have a direct effect on the<br />

abundance and diversity of soil and influence indirectly the microbial metabolism and nutrient cycling rate.<br />

Keywords: humus, microorganisms, bioactivators, fertility<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

To start and propose a suitable biological soil<br />

reconstruction plan it was necessary to initiate a<br />

series of observations and experiments in a<br />

characteristic agroecosystem of Dobroudja (Cumpana<br />

commune) in or<strong>de</strong>r to assess the current biological<br />

status. Using new agricultural technology, and adding<br />

different fertilizers the experiments have the aim to<br />

improve the number and activity of soil<br />

microorganism and indirectly to enhance the rate of<br />

organic matter <strong>de</strong>composition. This would improve<br />

over time the soil structure and restore the stock of<br />

humus in the soil.<br />

2. Material and Methods<br />

The experiments have taken place on a 7.5 ha<br />

plot situated in the outsi<strong>de</strong> of Cumpana, in Constanta<br />

district. Josef wheat was cultivated on the entire area,<br />

which was divi<strong>de</strong>d in 7 variants, each variant being<br />

administered a different type of fertilizer in different<br />

quantities and periods, as follows:<br />

- Variant I - only chemical fertilizers - 100kg/ha<br />

N15P25K15 in autumn, 150kg/ha NH4NO3 at the<br />

beginning of spring;<br />

- Variant II – Biovin organic fertilizer 400kg/ha and<br />

Biovin 30 of l/ha, ½ at herbici<strong>de</strong> stage and ½ at flour<br />

stage;<br />

- Variant III – gar<strong>de</strong>n soil - 15t/ha in autumn;<br />

- Variant VI – l/ha of Biovin 30, ½ at herbici<strong>de</strong> stage<br />

and ½ at flour stage;<br />

- Variant V – Biovin 150kg/ha administered during<br />

sowing, 150kg/ha NH4NO3, 40kg/ha at the beginning<br />

of spring, 50kg/ha at herbici<strong>de</strong> stage and 60kg/ha at<br />

flour stage;<br />

- Variant VI – Biovin 375kg/ha, liquid Biovin 30 of<br />

l/ha, ½ at herbici<strong>de</strong> stage and ½ at flour stage, 1mc<br />

Green Mycos, 1l Bactofil Professional;<br />

- Variant – March – were not applied amendments.<br />

Biovin Fertilizers are being administered for the<br />

first time in Dobrogea.<br />

Biovin is being produced through a<br />

technological process from grape kernels. 12 years of<br />

western research proved the following: it aerates the<br />

soil, improves it (it contains up to 70% humus<br />

makers), and purveys all plants with nutritive<br />

elements and biostimulators, it enriches the soil with<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


Data on the dinamics of some microbial groups... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 181-184 (2010)<br />

microorganisms that create humus, it strengthens the<br />

roots and it multiplies the percentage of smooth roots<br />

and radicular wintergr;<br />

Bactofil Professional is a product for<br />

improving the soil biological quality and contains<br />

nitrogen fixing bacteria phosphate-solubilization<br />

bacteria, and heterotrophic bacteria that stimulates<br />

the <strong>de</strong>composition of organic matter.<br />

Green Mycos is a product containing<br />

arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and a number of factors<br />

that stimulate the establishment of symbiosis,<br />

improving the soil quality up to 20 years. [1]<br />

Experiments began in autumn 2009 by sampling<br />

the soil at a <strong>de</strong>pth of 15 cm approximately, followed<br />

by quantification of some agrochemical (humus,<br />

indice N2) and biological parameters (bacteria, free<br />

N2-fixing bacateria, actinomycetes, microfungi).<br />

Quantitative <strong>de</strong>termination of microbial<br />

abundance was done by <strong>de</strong>cimal dilutions of soil<br />

followed by inoculation of known quantities on solid<br />

nutrient media. For this purpose, after weighing the<br />

samples were inoculated on culture medium with a<br />

specific composition. Thus, to <strong>de</strong>termine the number<br />

of total culturable heterotrophic bacteria it has been<br />

used nutrient:<br />

- agar medium [2], [3] [4] - (pulvis yeast extract<br />

2.5 g, peptone 0.2 g, Agar 17-20g. It was sterilized<br />

20 min at 120 o C);<br />

- free N2-fixing bacteria on Ashby medium, [5]<br />

(15g Mannitol; g K2HPO4 0.2, MgSO4 ∙ 7H2O 0.5 g,<br />

0.2 g NaCl, CaSO4 ∙ 7H2O 0.1 g, CaCO3 5g, Agar<br />

17-20g. was sterilized 30 min at 115 o C).<br />

Determination was ma<strong>de</strong> on the environment<br />

actinomicete Czapeck – Dox ( 3g NaNO3; 1g<br />

K2HPO4; 0,5g MgSO4 ; 0,5g KCl; FeSO4 traces;<br />

Sucrose 30g; 17-20g Agar; pH 5,5; it was sterilized<br />

30 min at 115 o C) [3], [4], [7] and the abundance of<br />

microfungi was <strong>de</strong>termined on Sabouraud medium<br />

(CaCl2 0.5g, 0.1g K2HPO4, KH2PO4 0.1g, 10%<br />

MoO3 0.1ml, 0.05ml FeCl3 10%, was sterilized 30<br />

min at 115 o C).<br />

The total number of bacteria per gram of soil<br />

was calculated using the formula: no. bacteria,<br />

actinomycetes, microfungi = X colonies x dilution x<br />

10 x 100/100-U where X = average of colonies<br />

grown on culture medium, 10 = balancing coefficient<br />

of 0.1 ml of inoculum in the reporting of dilution soil<br />

U% = soil moisture. [8]<br />

182<br />

3. Results and Discussions<br />

The initial estimations have reve<strong>ale</strong>d a relatively<br />

low abundance variability between different<br />

experimental variants.<br />

Thus, the lowest abundance was <strong>de</strong>tected in<br />

variant VI, heterotrophic bacteria having a mean<br />

abundance of 19.93 x 10 6 CFU/g dry soil (Fig. 1).<br />

The abundance was highest instead on variant<br />

II, in which case the total number of heterotrophic<br />

bacteria reached 45.45 x 10 6 CFU / g dry soil (Fig.<br />

1).<br />

Fig. 1 Bacterial <strong>de</strong>nsity distribution in the initial<br />

stage of the experiment (October 2009)<br />

Changes in microbial abundance in<br />

experimental and control reflect the heterogeneity of<br />

normal physicochemical and trophic conditions of the<br />

soil, the values recor<strong>de</strong>d can be consi<strong>de</strong>red normal<br />

for chernozem soil type.<br />

Fig. 2 Distribution of heterotrophic bacterial <strong>de</strong>nsity<br />

after six months of application of amendments (May<br />

2010)


Elena Delca / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 181-184 (2010)<br />

After six months of application of organic and<br />

inorganic amendments microbial abundance showed<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>rable changes in some cases, so the highest<br />

<strong>de</strong>nsity was recor<strong>de</strong>d in the experimental group<br />

fertilized with manure, variant III, in which case we<br />

<strong>de</strong>termined a <strong>de</strong>nsity of 501.79 x 10 6 CFU/g dry soil<br />

(Fig. 2). The number of bacteria also increased<br />

significantly in variant VI up to 142.13 x 10 6 CFU/g<br />

dry soil (Fig. 2).<br />

Paradoxically, after six months I have noticed<br />

<strong>de</strong>crease of heterotrophic bacteria in variant I, which<br />

might be explained by the effect of administration of<br />

chemical fertilizers and organic substance<br />

consumption by bacteria. In autumn 2009 the initial<br />

amount of organic matter in the form of crop residue<br />

remaining after harvest <strong>de</strong>creased gradually as the<br />

<strong>de</strong>composition and microbial consumption<br />

progressed and provi<strong>de</strong> sufficient nutrients to<br />

maintain viable bacterial population as numerous as<br />

in the beginning of the experiment. In other variants<br />

(II, IV and V) microbial <strong>de</strong>nsity presented weakly<br />

peaks compared with the control, and ranged between<br />

30.73 x 10 6 CFU/g soil dry and 46.31 x 10 6 CFU/g<br />

soil dry (Fig. 2), situation observed also in control<br />

variant.<br />

At the beginning of the experiment, <strong>de</strong>nsity of<br />

free nitrogen-fixing bacteria was relatively low, (Fig.<br />

3), ranging from 10.3 x 10 5 CFU/g dry soil to 26.7 x<br />

10 5 CFU/g dry soil. In case of variants I, III, V and<br />

VI values are very close to those recor<strong>de</strong>d for control<br />

(Fig. 3).<br />

Fig. 3 Changes of abundance of nitrogen-fixing<br />

bacteria (October 2009)<br />

183<br />

The highest number recor<strong>de</strong>d for variants II and<br />

IV ranging between 22.7 x 10 5 CFU/g dry soil and<br />

26.7 x 10 5 CFU/g dry soil, rely on local trophic<br />

conditions.<br />

In any case, there was a certain uniformity of<br />

abundance of nitrogen-fixing bacteria beginning of<br />

the experiment. At this stage relatively low<br />

abundance of nitrogen-fixing bacteria could be due to<br />

higher quantity of organic substance that stimulates<br />

competition within heterotrophic bacterial<br />

populations.<br />

Fig. 4 Change in binding <strong>de</strong>nsity micro N2, after six<br />

months (May 2010)<br />

After six months of adding the fertilizers our<br />

estimations reve<strong>ale</strong>d a significant increase of the<br />

number of nitrogen-fixing bacteria, including that of<br />

the control (Fig. 4).<br />

Most evi<strong>de</strong>nt increase of abundance of this<br />

group occurred I in variant III, where we recor<strong>de</strong>d<br />

about 195.81 x 10 5 CFU/g dry soil (Fig. 4).<br />

Significant increases were recor<strong>de</strong>d in the case<br />

of variants II, IV and VI, where abundance ranged<br />

from 90.44 x 10 5 CFU/g dry soil to 127.39 x 10 5<br />

CFU/g dry soil (Fig. 4).<br />

In variant I and V, values were close to the<br />

abundance <strong>de</strong>termined for control (Fig. 4).<br />

Table 1. Agrochemical analysis conducted in autumn<br />

2009<br />

Nr.<br />

Crt.<br />

Variant % mg/Kg<br />

Humus Indice N2<br />

1 V1 2.9 0.14


Data on the dinamics of some microbial groups... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 181-184 (2010)<br />

2 V2 2.95 0.14<br />

3 V3 3.21 0.15<br />

4 V4 3.07 0.15<br />

5 V5 2.83 0.13<br />

6 V6 3.09 0.15<br />

7 M1 3.16 0.15<br />

Table 2. Agrochemical analysis conducted after 6<br />

months (May 2010)<br />

Nr.<br />

Crt.<br />

Variant % mg/Kg<br />

Humus Indice N2<br />

1 V1 3.07 0.15<br />

2 V2 3.09 0.15<br />

3 V3 3.36 0.17<br />

4 V4 3.12 0.15<br />

5 V5 3.07 0.15<br />

6 V6 3.12 0.15<br />

7 M1 3.24 0.16<br />

Further information relative <strong>de</strong>termination of<br />

humus were not noted substantial increases for the<br />

period un<strong>de</strong>r review (Table 1, Table 2), which is<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rstandable due to the short observation time<br />

insufficient to i<strong>de</strong>ntify significant changes in the<br />

humus content.<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

Dynamics of the total number of heterotrophic<br />

bacteria presented significant changes after<br />

application of amendments. The most significant<br />

increase occurred in the variant enriched with<br />

manure, trend was also observed in the case of<br />

variant VI in which soil was treated with Biovin.<br />

The total number of nitrogen fixing bacteria<br />

showed a spectacular increase after six months of<br />

amendments application, effect that can be attributed<br />

only in part as a result of fertilizer.<br />

Results of soil chemical and microbiological<br />

analysis reveal a low contribution of microorganisms<br />

to the improvement of the soil fertility and microbial<br />

biodiversity. To improve the biological quality of soil<br />

it is necessary to increase the biomass of<br />

microorganisms in the soil by adding bacteria, and<br />

184<br />

their activities by introducing large amounts of<br />

organic matter.<br />

5. References<br />

[1] BERCA M, 2008 – Probleme <strong>de</strong> ecologia solului.<br />

Editura ceres, 2008: 43-63.<br />

[2] BERGEY’S, 1986 - Manual of Sistematic<br />

Bacteriology, vol. 2, Williams and Wilkins,<br />

Baltimore, USA, 4087: 1075-1079<br />

[3] CLARK F, 1965 - Agar plate method for total<br />

microbial count. Method for Soil Analysis, vol.2:<br />

1460-1465 Amercian Society for Agronomy,<br />

Madison, WL.<br />

[4] FLORENZANO G, 1983 - Fondamenti di<br />

microbiologia <strong>de</strong>l rerreno, Reda Ed, Firenze, 630:<br />

115-136.<br />

[5] PAPACOSTEA P, 1976 - Biologia solului, Ed.<br />

Ştiinţifică <strong>şi</strong> Enciclopedica, Bucureşti, 272: 81-<br />

259.<br />

[6] PITT JL, 1991 - A Laboratory Gui<strong>de</strong> to common<br />

Penicillium Species, USA, 184: 129-135.<br />

[7] TSUNEO WATANABE, 2001 - Pictorial Atlas of<br />

Soil and Seed Fungi, Morphologies of Cultured<br />

Fungi and Key to Species – Second edition, CRC<br />

Press, 504: 230-236.<br />

[8] DUMITRU M, TOTI M, VOICULESCU A-R,<br />

2005 – Decontaminarea solurilor poluate cu<br />

compu<strong>şi</strong> organici, Ed. Sitech, Bucureşti, 364:<br />

262-266.


Ovidius University Annals of Natural Sciences, Biology – Ecology Series Volume 14, 2010<br />

THE AGRICULTURAL POTENTIAL OF PHOSPHOGYPSUM WASTE PILES<br />

Lucian MATEI<br />

Pescarusului Street, Bl CP1, Sc B, Ap 18, Navodari, Constanţa County, Romania,<br />

e-mail: mat_lucian@yahoo.com<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abstract: The cultivation of Salix sp. on the phosphogypsum waste piles started from the wish to discover a<br />

cheap, efficient, and ecological covering method. For this purpose, Salix alba and Salix fragilis cuttings were<br />

used, as they were collected from an area adjacent to the town of Navodari. Some Salix fragilis cuttings were<br />

collected from the trees that grew spontaneously on the waste piles. The species Salix alba is newly introduced in<br />

the ecosystem of the phosphogypsum waste pile. The species of the genus Salix are dioicous. As they are not<br />

fertile, S. alba and S. fragilis are often crossbred in nature, creating hybrids, the most popular being S. x rubens.<br />

The large number of hybrids of the genus Salix offers them increased capacity to adapt and exist in the most<br />

various environmental conditions. The purpose of the project is to i<strong>de</strong>ntify a species or a hybrid that, given the<br />

life conditions on the phosphogypsum waste pile, should offer a consi<strong>de</strong>rable quantity of wood mass per ha in<br />

or<strong>de</strong>r to collect and exploit it as solid fuel.<br />

Keywords: Salix, phosphogypsum waste piles, ecological reconstruction, phytoreparation<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The i<strong>de</strong>a of cultivating Salix sp. on the<br />

phosphogypsum waste piles started from the wish to<br />

discover a cheap, efficient, and ecological covering<br />

method.<br />

The phosphogypsum waste pile number 3, which<br />

belongs to the S.C. Fertilchim – Marway S.A.<br />

company, is the result of massive accumulations of<br />

phosphogypsum obtained by the wet method of<br />

making phosphorus fertilizers. The waste pile is<br />

rectangular and has a surface of approximately 21 ha.<br />

In 1996, it was removed from the technological flux<br />

and a poor vegetation settled spontaneously on its<br />

surface over the next few years. A study regarding<br />

flora, accomplished in 2009, i<strong>de</strong>ntified 35 species of<br />

plants [1]. The dominant species is Puccinellia<br />

distans, a grass that prefers salty soils (Poaceae) [2].<br />

Apart from this dominant species, waste pile number<br />

3 also displays a mixture of various species in terms<br />

of preference for the environmental conditions. Thus,<br />

xerophile species such as Tamarix ramosissima live<br />

together with hygrophile species such as Salix fragilis<br />

and Salix matsudana. We can also encounter<br />

spontaneous Salix caprea (mesophile) on the<br />

phosphogypsum waste pile.<br />

The species of the genus Salix are dioicous, the<br />

sexes being separate: the trees bear m<strong>ale</strong> or fem<strong>ale</strong><br />

flowers. Some species of the genus Salix are<br />

interfertile. Different varieties of Salix alba and Salix<br />

fragilis crossbreed frequently in nature giving birth to<br />

different hybrids, among which the most common is<br />

Salix x rubens. The overlapping of the morphological<br />

features of the two species increases the <strong>de</strong>gree of<br />

difficulty in the correct <strong>de</strong>termination of the species<br />

[3]. Both the morphological studies and the genetic<br />

investigations realized on the S. alba – S. x rubens –<br />

S. fragilis complex indicate its division into two main<br />

groups. A group is ma<strong>de</strong> up of Salix alba and Salix x<br />

rubens, while the second group is ma<strong>de</strong> up of S.<br />

fragilis si S. x rubens var. basfordiana [4]. This<br />

division of the complex into the two groups concords<br />

with previous research (Triest et al., 1998, 2000),<br />

quoted by [4], who analyzed the isoenzymes and<br />

RAPD (Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA). As a<br />

result of these tests, the S. alba – S. x rubens – S.<br />

fragilis complex was divi<strong>de</strong>d into two groups: “S.<br />

alba-like” and “S. fragilis-like”.<br />

ISSN-1453-1267 © 2010 Ovidius University Press


The agricultural potential... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 185-190 (2010)<br />

The great variety of hybrids existing in nature<br />

prevents sometimes the exact i<strong>de</strong>ntification of the<br />

species of the genus Salix only by morphological<br />

features. It is possible that the specimens i<strong>de</strong>ntified<br />

on the phosphogypsum waste pile as belonging to the<br />

species S. fragilis, might be hybrids that inherited<br />

from the genitors the capacity to live on a salty<br />

substrate which lacks organic matter but has high<br />

humidity. Unfortunately, the lack of financial means<br />

prevented the accomplishment of ADNcp (ADN<br />

chloroplastic) analyses that allow the precise<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntification of the species or supposed hybrids used<br />

within the experimental project for the setting up of a<br />

willow culture. The large number of hybrids of<br />

species of the genus Salix offers them increased<br />

capacities to adapt to the most diverse environmental<br />

conditions.<br />

Starting from this theory, the experimental<br />

culture using species of the genus Salix on the<br />

phosphogypsum waste pile seeks to i<strong>de</strong>ntify a species<br />

or a hybrid that, in the living conditions of the waste<br />

pile, should provi<strong>de</strong> the most consi<strong>de</strong>rable quantity of<br />

wood mass. I mention that the species Salix alba is<br />

newly introduced in the ecosystem of the<br />

phosphogypsum waste pile with the purpose of<br />

monitoring the production of biomass reported per<br />

surface unit.<br />

2. Material and Methods<br />

The experimental culture of Salix sp. on<br />

phosphogypsum waste pile no. 3 belonging to the<br />

S.C. Fertilchim – Marway S.A. company was set up<br />

on a vegetation-free surface of 540 square meters.<br />

For this purpose, Salix alba and Salix fragilis cuttings<br />

were used. They were collected from an area adjacent<br />

to the town of Navodari. Some Salix fragilis cuttings<br />

were collected from the trees that grew spontaneously<br />

on the waste piles. This surface was planted with 110<br />

cuttings belonging to the species S. alba (44 pieces)<br />

and S. fragilis (6 pieces). The cuttings were planted<br />

on parallel rows with a length of 20 m. The distance<br />

between two successive rows is three meters, while<br />

the distance between the cuttings on the same row is<br />

two meters. The number of cuttings on a row is<br />

eleven. The planting <strong>de</strong>pth is between 0.7 and one<br />

meter. Thus, two rows with S. fragilis were planted at<br />

186<br />

0.7 meters and eight rows (four with S. alba and four<br />

with S. fragilis) were planted at a <strong>de</strong>pth of one meter.<br />

The collection of cuttings occurred between 10-20<br />

March 2010, while<br />

their planting took place between 16-27 March 2010.<br />

Some of the cuttings (22 pieces) were collected from<br />

S. fragilis grown spontaneously on the<br />

phosphogypsum pile, while the others (88 pieces) –<br />

44 S. alba and 44 S. fragilis – were collected from<br />

the area adjacent to the town of Navodari. The age of<br />

the cuttings is between one and three years, while<br />

their sizes vary between one and 2.5 meters.<br />

In or<strong>de</strong>r to verify the influence of the<br />

microclimate effect, five rows of cuttings were<br />

planted in phosphogypsum ditches. The <strong>de</strong>pth of the<br />

ditch was approximately 0.4 meters, while the width<br />

was 0.3 meters. The planting <strong>de</strong>pth in four of the five<br />

ditches was measured to be one meter, taking the<br />

phosphogypsum surface as marker and not one meter,<br />

taking the bottom of the ditch as marker. In the case<br />

of the fifth ditch, the planting <strong>de</strong>pth is 0.7 meters and<br />

it was measured the same as in the previous rows.<br />

The planting method is presented in Figure 1.<br />

Fig.1. The way in which the cuttings were planted<br />

The other five rows that make up the witness<br />

area for the study of the microclimate influence were<br />

planted directly on the phosphogypsum surface,<br />

without digging ditches. The planting <strong>de</strong>pth in the<br />

case of four out of five rows is one meter, while a<br />

row was planted at 0.7 meters.


Matei Lucian / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 185-190 (2010)<br />

No preparation or maintenance works were done<br />

before and after planting the newly established<br />

culture (e.g. fertilization, irrigation, etc).<br />

3. Results and Discussions<br />

The monitoring of the growth and <strong>de</strong>velopment<br />

of the two willow species used to set up the<br />

experimental culture on the phosphogypsum waste<br />

pile, namely S. alba and S. fragilis, led to surprising<br />

results. Thus, on April 8, 2010, twelve days after the<br />

planting, it was observed that 107 out of the 110<br />

planted cuttings took root and sprouts had <strong>de</strong>veloped<br />

on them, while the first two-three leaves had already<br />

emerged in a small number of these cuttings. Three of<br />

the 110 cuttings did not take root and dried out. Two<br />

of these belong to S. fragilis and one to S. alba. On<br />

April 18, 2010, the sprouts on the 107 cuttings<br />

opened and the first leaves emerged. Some of them<br />

even grew three-four cm long shoots. On May 20,<br />

2010, it was observed that of the 107 cuttings that<br />

bore sprouts and shoots only 81 <strong>de</strong>veloped normally,<br />

with 5-20 cm long shoots. The other 26 were<br />

stagnating. The same situation was encountered on<br />

June 1, 2010, with the specification that the 81<br />

cuttings with normal <strong>de</strong>velopment had 10-35 cm long<br />

shoots and some of the 26 stagnating cuttings began<br />

to dry.<br />

We must mention that on the two rows (one with<br />

ditch for the verification of the microclimate<br />

influence and one without ditch, as witness), where<br />

the planting <strong>de</strong>pth was 0.7 meters, only S. fragilis was<br />

used. These two rows registered the highest number<br />

of stagnating cuttings about to get dry. The<br />

conclusion is thus that the planting <strong>de</strong>pth is very<br />

important, the greater the <strong>de</strong>pth, the more chances the<br />

cuttings have to take root and <strong>de</strong>velop normally. By<br />

taking phosphogypsum samples from various <strong>de</strong>pths<br />

and performing humidity analyses, it was observed<br />

that humidity increases directly proportionally with<br />

the <strong>de</strong>pth of the sample. Moreover, by analyzing<br />

samples from the surface of the phosphogypsum (0-5<br />

cm) and those from the bottom of the ditches (40 cm),<br />

it was noticed over a period of several months that<br />

the samples from greater <strong>de</strong>pths contained more<br />

water even though the months when the sample was<br />

collected were poor in precipitations. We specify that<br />

187<br />

no samples for the humidity test were collected in<br />

December 2009 because it rained on the day<br />

scheduled for the sample collection (December 12,<br />

2009). The graph in Fig. 2 presents the variation of<br />

humidity <strong>de</strong>pending on the time and <strong>de</strong>pth for the<br />

sample collection.<br />

Fig. 2. The variation of humidity <strong>de</strong>pending on the<br />

time and <strong>de</strong>pth of the sample collection<br />

This situation explains to a large extent the<br />

surprising presence of certain xerophyte species<br />

alongsi<strong>de</strong> hygrophyte ones on the phosphogypsum<br />

waste pile.<br />

In or<strong>de</strong>r to make a correct estimation of the<br />

rooting and normal <strong>de</strong>velopment of the cuttings<br />

<strong>de</strong>pending on species, we will only take into account<br />

the eight rows on which the cuttings were planted at a<br />

<strong>de</strong>pth of one meter (four with ditch for the<br />

verification of the microclimate effect and four<br />

without ditch, as witness). These eight rows inclu<strong>de</strong><br />

four rows planted with S. alba and four rows planted<br />

with S. fragilis. The total number of cuttings on these<br />

eight rows is 88, of which S. alba – 44, and S. fragilis<br />

– 44. Of the 44 S. alba cuttings planted on four of the<br />

eight rows, 38 <strong>de</strong>velop normally, while of the 44 S.<br />

fragilis cuttings planted on four of the eight<br />

rows, only 32 <strong>de</strong>velop normally. Though it is<br />

premature to draw pertinent conclusions, we can say<br />

that S. alba seems to be better adapted to the<br />

conditions of the phosphogypsum waste pile,<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>ring that its percentage of rooting and<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment is 86.36%, compared to S. fragilis<br />

whose percentage is 72.72%. Taking these results


The agricultural potential... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 185-190 (2010)<br />

into account, it is surprising why S. alba did not<br />

emerge spontaneously on the phosphogypsum waste<br />

pile, consi<strong>de</strong>ring that we i<strong>de</strong>ntified a fem<strong>ale</strong> specimen<br />

from this species located at less than one km from the<br />

pile. This observation represents another argument in<br />

favor of the hypothesis that the species<br />

S. fragilis and S. matsudana existing on the<br />

phosphogypsum waste pile occurred by vegetative<br />

reproduction and not sexual one (from seeds).<br />

In regards to the lower rooting and <strong>de</strong>velopment<br />

<strong>de</strong>gree, it is probable that the age of the cuttings used<br />

for planting had an important role in this aspect.<br />

Thus, all the S. alba cuttings were young (un<strong>de</strong>r one<br />

year old), while those of S. fragilis were ol<strong>de</strong>r<br />

(between two and three years old).<br />

The phosphogypsum on waste pile no. 3,<br />

belonging to the S.C. Fertilchim – Marway S.A.<br />

company, contains 90% calcium sulfate or gypsum<br />

hydrated with water molecules (CaSO4x2H2O),<br />

alongsi<strong>de</strong> which we can encounter phosphorus<br />

pentoxi<strong>de</strong> (P2O5), traces of fluorhidric acid (HF),<br />

silicate (SiO2) and high concentrations of heavy<br />

metals [5]. An analysis bulleting released by the<br />

Constanta County Office for Agronomical Studies<br />

and Pedology on May 6, 2009 attests to the fact that<br />

the analyzed phosphogypsum contains no organic<br />

matter (humus), nor nitrogen (N). The nutrients<br />

contained by the phosphogypsum are potassium (K)<br />

in very low quantity and a higher amount of<br />

phosphorus (P), a fact also <strong>de</strong>monstrated by the<br />

analyses accomplished by the method of extraction<br />

with lactate acetate (A.L.), which were realized in the<br />

Pedology Laboratory of the Faculty for Natural and<br />

Agricultural Sciences within “Ovidius” University.<br />

Even though it is hard to believe that there are species<br />

that can <strong>de</strong>velop normally on a 100% mineral<br />

substrate, these four willow species (S. fragilis, S.<br />

matsudana and S caprea – spontaneous, and S. alba<br />

– introduced artificially) contradict this statement.<br />

Another factor that makes possible the normal<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment of these species directly on<br />

phosphogypsum is their resistance in conditions of<br />

high soil salinity. Thus, S. fragilis, S. matsudana and<br />

S. seringeana tolerate high salinity values [6], while<br />

S. alba is “the most tolerant of all willow species to<br />

brackish water” [7]. In parallel, pH analyses were<br />

accomplished on samples collected from <strong>de</strong>pths<br />

between 5 and 100 cm which displayed pH values<br />

188<br />

between 4.7 and 6.56. These results, corroborated<br />

with the fact that the quoted species prefer a slightly<br />

acid pH, make the phosphogypsum waste pile a<br />

favorable environment for the setting up of a willow<br />

culture.<br />

As the graph in Fig. 3 shows, no correlation can<br />

be ma<strong>de</strong> between pH value and the <strong>de</strong>pth of sample<br />

collection.<br />

Fig. 3. The pH variation <strong>de</strong>pending on the time and<br />

<strong>de</strong>pth of the sample collection<br />

The only plausible explanation regarding this<br />

random distribution of the pH values in the<br />

phosphogypsum <strong>de</strong>posit could be that at the moment<br />

when the phosphogypsum suspension was<br />

neutralized, the milk of lime used did not always have<br />

the proper concentration.<br />

Willow is one of the well studied plants in or<strong>de</strong>r<br />

to use it in the phytoreparation processes, as it has a<br />

high capacity to accumulate heavy metals and it is<br />

easy to cultivate (Tremela et al. 1997; Pulford and<br />

Watson 2003) quoted by [8]. By concentrating<br />

important quantities of heavy metals in the shoots that<br />

will be collected every year, the willows will<br />

accomplish a <strong>de</strong>pollution of the phosphogypsum and<br />

this will be a first step towards its transformation into<br />

organic-mineral fertilizer when the willow plantation<br />

will be eliminated. The strong bioaccumulation<br />

phenomenon in the species of the genus Salix will be<br />

favored by the slightly acid pH and will accelerate the<br />

cleansing of the phosphogypsum [9].


Matei Lucian / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 185-190 (2010)<br />

The harvesting should be done between<br />

November-February, after the leaves fall from the<br />

shoots. For harvesting, Claas Jaguar 880 GBE 1 or<br />

Claas Jaguar combines fitted with a HS2 harvesting<br />

head will be used. This type of combines transform<br />

the harvested shoots into a hash [10] that is left to dry<br />

and is then used in thermal power stations especially<br />

adapted for this solid fuel. The hash can be<br />

transformed into pellets used in regular thermal<br />

power stations as solid fuel.<br />

It is premature to speak about the role of the<br />

microclimate. By observing the phenotypical<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment of the willows planted in ditches and by<br />

comparing them to the willows planted directly on<br />

phosphogypsum, no major differences were noticed<br />

in regard to the length of the shoots and the plant<br />

vigor. In the case of the number of cuttings that<br />

display normal <strong>de</strong>velopment, there are however small<br />

differences. Thus, in the case of S. fragilis, on the<br />

rows planted in ditches, there is a number of 17<br />

cuttings that <strong>de</strong>velop normally, compared to only 15<br />

cuttings with normal <strong>de</strong>velopment that were planted<br />

directly on phosphogypsum (witness area). In the<br />

case of S. alba on the rows planted in ditches, 20<br />

cuttings <strong>de</strong>velop normally, compared to only 17<br />

cuttings with normal <strong>de</strong>velopment planted directly on<br />

the phosphogypsum (witness area). It was noticed<br />

that the microclimate effect created by the ditches<br />

into phosphogypsum have a very important role in the<br />

case of seed germination and <strong>de</strong>velopment of the<br />

annual herbaceous species. Thus, a few months after<br />

the digging of the ditches, a large number of<br />

herbaceous plants <strong>de</strong>veloped on their bottom. These<br />

plants germinated from seeds brought by the wind,<br />

mostly belonging to the dominant species in the waste<br />

pile phytocoenosis, Puccinellia distans.<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

In or<strong>de</strong>r to set up a willow culture, it is best to<br />

harvest and plant the cuttings between February 15 –<br />

March 15.<br />

The planting <strong>de</strong>pth is very important. It was<br />

observed that at <strong>de</strong>pths exceeding 40 cm,<br />

phosphogypsum always displays humidity over 25%<br />

even if the sample was collected after a period with<br />

189<br />

no precipitations. The optimum planting <strong>de</strong>pth is 100<br />

cm.<br />

The age of the cuttings has a very important role<br />

in the rooting process and their normal <strong>de</strong>velopment.<br />

Thus, in the case of the one-year-old cuttings, the<br />

success percentage was higher.<br />

Over the entire surface of the waste pile, between<br />

0 and 100 cm, the distribution of the pH values is<br />

purely random and they range between a minimum of<br />

4.7 and a maximum of 6.56. This fact<br />

favors the <strong>de</strong>velopment of species of the genus Salix,<br />

which prefer a substrate with slightly acid pH.<br />

The total lack of organic matter and of nitrogen<br />

from the substrate does not prevent the species from<br />

the genus Salix to <strong>de</strong>velop normally, but it is possible<br />

to lead to a lower quantity of wood mass per surface<br />

unit.<br />

Even though within the experimental culture<br />

there was a larger number of cuttings of the species S.<br />

alba with normal <strong>de</strong>velopment, it is premature to say<br />

that this species is better adapted to the<br />

environmental conditions than S. fragilis, a<br />

spontaneous species in the phosphogypsum waste pile<br />

ecosystem.<br />

It is also premature to draw a conclusion about<br />

the influence of the microclimate generated by the<br />

ditches into phosphogypsum on the <strong>de</strong>velopment of<br />

the S. alba and S. fragilis cuttings. However, it was<br />

noticed that the microclimate generated by the ditches<br />

has a beneficial influence on the species of annual<br />

plants. Thus, in an interval of three months, a large<br />

number of herbaceous plants emerged on the bottom<br />

of the ditches, most of them belonging to Puccinellia<br />

distans, a dominant species in the phytocoenosis of<br />

the phosphogypsum <strong>de</strong>posit.<br />

The advantages of a culture with species<br />

belonging to the genus Salix on the phosphogypsum<br />

waste piles are multiple:<br />

- To obtain ecological fuel – the carbon<br />

eliminated by burning represents the carbon<br />

- Stored previously by photosynthesis, so no extra<br />

amounts of carbon are released into the<br />

atmosphere;<br />

- To use fields otherwise improper for other<br />

cultures and transform thus losses into profit;<br />

- The <strong>de</strong>velopment of the root system and of the<br />

willow shoots will prevent wind erosion;


The agricultural potential... / Ovidius University Annals, Biology-Ecology Series 14: 185-190 (2010)<br />

- Taking into account the fact that the harvest of<br />

shoots takes place between November and<br />

February, the annual leaf litter on the<br />

phosphogypsum surface will accelerate the<br />

process of soil formation;<br />

- By the phenomenon of bioaccumulation, the<br />

trees (shrubs) from the plantation will<br />

concentrate into their own structures important<br />

quantities of heavy metals that will be removed<br />

annually by cutting the shoots and <strong>de</strong>creasing<br />

thus the polluting content of the<br />

phosphogypsum;<br />

- The species of the genus Salix, fond of<br />

humidity, will retain part of the water resulted<br />

from precipitations, reducing drastically the<br />

levigation phenomenon and the draining of the<br />

phosphorus into the ground water;<br />

- The photosynthesis and evapo-transpiration<br />

generated by the willows will improve air<br />

quality and the local microclimate during the<br />

warm season.<br />

The main disadvantage is the fact that, being a<br />

monoculture, it will be more vulnerable to pests.<br />

Another possible disadvantage is that, because the<br />

cuttings are not planted like in a culture on swampy<br />

or irrigated land (the same <strong>de</strong>nsity per square meter),<br />

the quantity of wood mass per ha can be reduced.<br />

5. References<br />

[1]. SÂRBU I., Stefan N., Ivănescu Lăcrămioara,<br />

Mânzu C., 2001. Flora ilustrată a plantelor<br />

vasculare din estul României, Determinator, vol.<br />

I <strong>şi</strong> II, Editura Universităţii „Alexandru Ioan<br />

Cuza”, Ia<strong>şi</strong>.<br />

[2]. GOMOIU M.-T., Skolka M., 2001. Ecologie -<br />

Metodologii pentru studii ecologice, Ovidius<br />

University Press, Constanţa.<br />

[3]. SKVORTSOVA. K., 1999. Willows of Russia<br />

and adjacent countries. Taxonomical and<br />

geographical review. Univ. Joensuu Fac.<br />

Mathem. and Natru. Sci. Rept. Ser. 39. 307 pp.<br />

[4]. www.bfafh.<strong>de</strong>/inst2/sg-pdf/52_3-4_148.pdf.<br />

Diversity of dte willow complex Salix alba – S x.<br />

rubens – S. Fragilis<br />

190<br />

[5]. www.containment.fsu.edu/cd/content/pdf/466.pd<br />

f. Vegetative cover for phosphogypsum dumps:<br />

A Romanian field study.<br />

[6]. CROUCH R.J, Honeyman M.N., 1986, 'The<br />

relative salt tolerance of willow cuttings.' Journal<br />

of Soil Conservation, vol 42 (2), p. 103-104.<br />

[7]. ZALLAR S. Botanical Characteristics of the<br />

Willows, Soil Conservation Authority, Kew.<br />

[8]. www.sci.uszeged.hu/ABS/2006/Acta%20HP/50<br />

37.pdf. Change of root and rhizosphere characters<br />

of willow (Salix sp) induced by high heavy metal<br />

pollution.<br />

[9]. www.umass.edu/.../Phytoremediation%20PDF<br />

/PhytoLitReview.pdf. Phytoremediation literature<br />

review.<br />

[10]. www.bioeng.ca/pdfs/meetingpapers/2005/CSAE%20papers/05-080.pdf.<br />

Cutting, bundling and chipping shortrotation<br />

willow.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!