TRENDS IN BIOSCIENCES 6-1, 2013 EDITION
CALL FOR RESEARCH PAPERS
CALL FOR RESEARCH PAPERS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Print : ISSN 0974-8<br />
Online : ISSN 0976-2485<br />
NAAS Rating : 2.7<br />
Trends<br />
in<br />
Biosciences<br />
A Quarterly International Journal<br />
Volume 6 Number 1 March, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Online version available at<br />
www.trendsinbiosciencesjournal.com<br />
SPECIAL OFFER<br />
Life Membership<br />
Journal Membership – Rs. 1000<br />
Benefit : Online access of journal for lifetime along with certificate of membership<br />
Journal Membership with free authorship – Rs. 4000<br />
Benefits : Authorship charges for publishing research papers in Trends in<br />
Biosciences Journal is nil (No authorship charges) for lifetime.<br />
Award of fellow of DSAS&RD society<br />
Dheerpura Society for Advancement of Science<br />
and Rural Development
Print : ISSN 0974-8<br />
Online : ISSN 0976-2485<br />
NAAS Rating : 2.7<br />
Trends<br />
in<br />
Biosciences<br />
A Quarterly International Journal<br />
Volume 6 Number 1 March, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Online version available at<br />
www.trendsinbiosciencesjournal.com<br />
SPECIAL OFFER<br />
Life Membership<br />
Journal Membership – Rs. 1000<br />
Benefit : Online access of journal for lifetime along with certificate of membership<br />
Journal Membership with free authorship – Rs. 4000<br />
Benefits : Authorship charges for publishing research papers in Trends in<br />
Biosciences Journal is nil (No authorship charges) for lifetime.<br />
Award of fellow of DSAS&RD society<br />
Dheerpura Society for Advancement of Science<br />
and Rural Development<br />
Branch Office : Kanpur (U.P.) 208 018, India
International Advisory Board<br />
Trends in Biosciences<br />
A Quaterly International Scientific Journal<br />
www.trendsinbiosciencesjournal.com<br />
Dr. A. Coomans, Ex-Professor, State University of Ghent, Belgium<br />
Dr. Randy Gaugler, Director, Centre for Vector Biology, Rutgers University, USA<br />
Dr. S.B. Sharma, Director, Plant Security, South Perth, Australia<br />
Dr. Zahoor Ahmad, Professor, Jubail Industrial College, Saudi Arabia<br />
Advisory Board<br />
Dr. G.N. Qazi, Vice Chancellor, Jamia Hamdard University, New Delhi<br />
Dr. G.C. Mishra, Ex-Director National Centre for Cell Science, Pune<br />
Dr. I. Ahmad, Ex-Director, Department of Science & Technology, New Delhi<br />
Dr. N. Nadarajan, Director, Indian Institute of Pulses Research (IIPR), Kanpur<br />
Dr. Masood Ali, Ex-Director, Indian Institute of Pulses Research (IIPR), Kanpur<br />
Editorial Board<br />
Editor in Chief : Dr. S.S. Ali, Emeritus Scientist, Indian Institute of Pulses Research (IIPR), Kanpur<br />
Dr. Erdogan Esref HAKKI, Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Selcuk University Konya Turkey<br />
Dr. S. K. Agarwal, Principal Lentil Breeder, ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria<br />
Dr. H.S. Gaur, Dean & Director (Education), IARI, New Delhi<br />
Dr. B.B. Singh, Assistant Director General Oilseed & Pulses, ICAR, New Delhi<br />
Dr. Absar Ahmad, Senior Scientist, National Chemical Laboratory, Pune<br />
Dr. N.P. Singh, Coordinator, AICRP Chickpea, IIPR, Kanpur<br />
Dr. Raman Kapoor, Head, Dept. of Biotechnology, Indian Sugarcane Research Institute, Lucknow<br />
Dr. S.K. Jain, Coordinator, AICRP Nematode and IARI, New Delhi<br />
Dr. Sanjeev Gupta, Coordinator, MULLaRP, IIPR, Kanpur<br />
Dr. Naimuddin, Sr. Scientist (Plant Pathology), IIPR, Kanpur<br />
Dr. Rashid Pervez, Sr. Scientist, Indian Institute of Spices Research, Khozicod, Kerala<br />
Dr. Badre Alam, Associate Prof. Gorakhpur University, U.P.<br />
Dr. Shamsa Arif (English editor), Barkatullah University, Bhopal, M.P.<br />
Er. Sobia Ali, Genetic, Aisa Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi<br />
Business Manager, Er. S. Osaid Ali, Biotechnology Research Foundation, Kanpur<br />
Trends in Biosciences abstracted in CABI abstract, U.K.<br />
Subscription Rates for <strong>2013</strong>:<br />
Version<br />
<strong>IN</strong>DIAN**<br />
in Rs./issue<br />
Individual Institutional Single article<br />
FOREIGN <strong>IN</strong>DIAN FOREIGN <strong>IN</strong>DIAN<br />
in US$/issue in Rs.<br />
in US$ in Rs.<br />
FOREIGN<br />
in US$<br />
*Print /Number **1000* 50 2500 200 50 10<br />
**Online 1000 50 2500 200 150 25<br />
*Author’s Contribution : Rs. 1000/paper (minimum upto 2 authors) and Rs. 500/paper for additional authors. **Same for SAARC,<br />
countries only soft copy.<br />
*Payment must be made through Demand Draft payable to State Bank of India, Kalyanpur Branch, (Branch code 01962)<br />
Kanpur, U.P. India, in favour of Trends in Biosciences (Ac/No. 31575871348) along with manuscript and sent to Dr. S.S. Ali,<br />
Editor in Chief, H-1312, VIP Lane, Satyam Vihar, Avas Vikas No.1, Kalyanpur, Kanpur- 208 018, U.P. India. In case of<br />
outstation cheque an extra amount of Rs. 50/- may be paid as clearance of cheque. For e-banking add Rs. 25/- (contact:<br />
ss_ali@rediffmail.com).
Dheerpura Society for Advancement of Science and Rural Development<br />
(Reg. No. 01/01/01/16715/06)<br />
The Dheerpura Society for Advancement of Science and Rural Development was founded on 28 July, 2006 with the following<br />
objectives<br />
1. To promote research and development in agriculture, life sciences through publishing journal, organizing seminars etc.<br />
2. To make people environmental conscious<br />
3. To work for human development in society<br />
4. To work for uplifting of rural masses and their development<br />
Membership<br />
Membership to the society is open to all individuals / institutions interested in society’s objective by becoming ordinary<br />
life, institutional, corporate members against payment of membership fee.<br />
Membership fee Indian (Rs.) Foreign (US$)<br />
Ordinary (Annual) 2,000 100<br />
Life member 10,000 1,000<br />
Institutional 15,000 1,500<br />
Corporate member 20,000 2,000<br />
Renewal of annual membership should be done in January each year; if the membership is not received by 15 February, the<br />
membership would stand cancelled. Membership fee should be drawn in favour of Dheerpura Society for Advancement of Science<br />
and Rural Development, State Bank of India, Kalyanpur branch (code 01962), A/c No. MSB31575856239, Kanpur on the<br />
following address. In case of out station cheque an extra amount of Rs. 50/- may be paid as clearance cheque. For e-banking add<br />
Rs. 25/-.<br />
Dr S.S. Ali<br />
President<br />
H-1312, VIP Lane, Satyam Vihar,<br />
Awas Vikas No.1, Kalyanpur, Kanpur 208 018 (U.P.), India<br />
Ph. : 09919388690, 09151399557<br />
Email: ss_ali@rediffmail.com
Trends in Biosciences<br />
Volume 6 Number 1 March, <strong>2013</strong><br />
CONTENTS<br />
M<strong>IN</strong>I REVIEW<br />
1. Biodiversity and Its Responsibility in Biotechnology : A Review 1<br />
V.K. Mishra and D.K. Dwivedi<br />
2. Physiological, Biochemical and Molecular Changes during High Temperature in Plants – A Review 5<br />
Kshitij Kumar and I.U. Rao<br />
3. Knowledge and Gaps for Herbal Zinc in Relation to Their Role in Regulation of Male Fertility : A Review 14<br />
Manish Mathur<br />
4. Insectivorous Plants and Their Trapping Mechanism: A Review 19<br />
Murali, S. and Narasa Reddy, G.<br />
RESEARCH PAPERS<br />
5. Expression and Immunogenicity of E2 Glycoprotein Gene of Classical Swine Fever Virus Cloned in 23<br />
Eukaryotic Expression Vector<br />
Nitin Sharma, Purshotam Kaushik and Anant Rai<br />
6. Morphological and Anatomical Aspects of Callogenesis and Somatic Embryogenesis of Date Palm 28<br />
(Phoenix dactylifera L.)<br />
Akshaya Bhati and Atul Chandra<br />
7. Successful Therapeutic Management of Snake Bite in A Dog 31<br />
Sonal Shrivastava, Debosri Bhowmick and P.C. Shukla<br />
8. Biology and Feeding Potential of Cheilomenus sexmaculata (Fab.) on Bean Aphid (Aphis craccivora Koch) 33<br />
and Mustard Aphid (Liphaphis erysimi L.)<br />
Akshay Kumar, C.S. Prasad and G.N. Tiwari<br />
9. Survey, Vector Relationships and Host Range Studies of Tomato Leaf Curl Karnataka Virus Causing 36<br />
Sunflower Leaf Curl Disease<br />
Vanitha, L.S., Rangaswamy, K.T., Govindappa, M.R., Manjunatha, L., Shivakumar S. Chinchure<br />
and Govardhana, M.<br />
10. Losses Caused Due to Alternaria Blight Disease in the Grain Yield of Pigeonpea 40<br />
Laxman Prasad Balai and R.B. Singh<br />
11. Relative Performance of Resource Conservation Technologies in Maize Based Cropping System Under 43<br />
Temperate Kashmir<br />
Fayaz Ahmed Bahar<br />
12. Influence of Deltamethrin and Achook ® on Activities of Phosphatases in the Nervous Tissue of Zebrafish, 46<br />
Danio rerio<br />
Dilip Kumar Sharma and Badre Alam Ansari<br />
13. Herbal Rumenotoric Drugs and Their Effect on Digestion and Growth Performance of Crossbred Calves 50<br />
R.D. Gautam, D.P. Singh, Ram Niwas and Abed M. Albial<br />
14. Studies on Nutritional Quality of Idli Fortified with Whey Protein Concentrates 54<br />
Alka Yadav, Ranu Prasad and Ramesh Chandra<br />
15. Evaluation and Assessment of Ground Water of Shivpuri Town in Madhya Pradesh 56<br />
Chandana Jain and Ritu Mendiratta<br />
16. Spatial and Modular Variability in Phytosterol Composition in Tribulus terrestris 59<br />
Manish Mathur<br />
17. Performance Evaluation of Commercial Reapers for Finger Millet Harvesting 63<br />
H.G. Ashoka, G.M. Prashantha, E.G. Ashok and M.V. Channa Byregowda<br />
18. Induced Mutation Through Gamma Irradiation at Different Doses to Create Genetic Variability and Study 65<br />
the Improvement in Yield and Yield Attributes of Genotype HD 2867<br />
Shubhra Singh, Ram, M., S. Marker, Abrar Yasin, B. and Akhilesh Kumar
19. Assesment of Genetic Divergence in Chickpea Genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.) 68<br />
Sudhanshu Jain and Y.M. Indapurkar<br />
20. Phytotoxic Effect of Asclepias curasavica Linn on Metabolism of Parthenium hysterophorus L 70<br />
T.G. Nagaraja and A.H. Pudale<br />
21. Serological Detection and Host Range Studies of Peanut Bud Necrosis Virus Infecting Tomato 73<br />
Mallu Govardhana, Gopinath, K., Vanitha, L.S., Eswar Reddy Maddi and Manjunatha, L.<br />
22. Influence of Genotypes on Consumability of the Leaves, Growth and Development of Spodoptera litura (Fab.) 76<br />
Pradyumn Singh, N.S. Bhadauria and Pooja Chauhan<br />
23. Diversity Pattern of Beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera) In and Around the Historic Joysagar Tank of Assam, India 78<br />
I. Rahman, C. Sonowal and M. Nath<br />
24. Effect of Ginger and Mint Extract on Microflora of Yoghurt Culture 80<br />
Dinker Singh and Swashankh Kumar<br />
25. Anti-Fungal Evaluation of Calotropis Leaf Extract against Some Plant Pathogenic Fungi 82<br />
Rajni Singh Sasode and Pradyumn Singh<br />
26. Studies on Status of Leaf Spot of Groundnut in Chunar and Nearby Areas of Mirzapur District of Uttar Pradesh 86<br />
Bharat Chandra Nath, R.B. Singh and Laxman Prasad Balai<br />
27. Studies on the Effect of Scent Components on the Somatic Cells of Allium sativum L 88<br />
Ch. Srinivasulu<br />
28. A Study on the Quality of Milk in Gwalior 93<br />
Chandana Jain and Ritu Mediratta<br />
29. Prediction of Lifetime Milk Production from Early Lactation Traits in Crossbred Cattle 95<br />
Hemant Kumar and B.K. Hooda<br />
30. Fungal Growth on C1 Compounds: A Study of the Amino Acid Composition of a Methanol-utilizing Strain of 97<br />
Trichoderma viride 01 PP<br />
Mohd. Shahid, Mukesh Srivastva, Anuradha Singh and Neelam Pathak<br />
31. Varietal Evaluation of Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.) In Allahabad Agro – climatic Condition 99<br />
Mukesh Yadav, V.M. Prasad and Chandan Singh Ahirwar<br />
32. Screening of Chickpea Genotypes for Resistant against Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera Hubn. 101<br />
Jeewesh Kumar, D.C. Singh, A.P. Singh and S.K. Verma<br />
33. Knowledge Level of Farmers About Recommended Cultivation Practices of Groundnut in Panchayat Samiti 104<br />
Govindgarh of District Jaipur (Rajasthan)<br />
H.N. Verma and J.P. Yadav<br />
34. Stability Studies on Sewage Irrigation Effect on Grain Yield and Protein-content in Mungbean 106<br />
[Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek<br />
Dyuti Pandey, P.S. Shukla and D.N. Shukla<br />
35. In Vitro Screening and Identification of Putative Sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) Transformants 108<br />
Expressing ECNAC1 Gene by Salt Stress Method<br />
K.C. Manjunath, A. Mahadeva, Rohini Sreevathsa, N. Ramachandra Swamy and T.G. Prasad<br />
36. Efficacy of Different Herbicides for Weed Control in Transplanted Rice (Oryza sativa. L) Under Vertisols 112<br />
of Rajasthan<br />
Chandra Prakash, R.K. Shivran, N.R. Koli and J.C. Sharma<br />
37. Bio-efficacy of Herbicide Combination on Weed Control and Yield Performance of Transplanted 115<br />
Rice (Oryza sativa. L)<br />
Chandra Prakash, R.K. Shivran, N.R. Koli and J.C. Sharma<br />
SHORT COMMUNICATIONS<br />
38. Genetic Variability, Heritability and Correlation Studies in Wheat Genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.) 118<br />
Ekta Singh, Ramteke P.W., M. Ram, B.A. Wani and Sadhna Singh<br />
39. Screening of Horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum) Genotypes against Horsegram Yellow Mosaic 120<br />
Virus (HgYMV) Disease in Karnataka<br />
Prema, G.U., Rudraswamy, P., Nagaraju and Rangaswamy, K.T.<br />
40. Evaluation of Garlic Genotypes Under Temperate Conditions of Kashmir Valley 122<br />
Mushtaq, A. Chatoo, Parvaze, A. Sofi, Khalid, R. Dar, Angrez Ali and Tasaduk Shafi<br />
Author Index Vol. 5 (1-4) 2012 124<br />
Subject Index Vol. 5 (1-4) 2012 128<br />
Subscription Order Form<br />
Instructions to the Authors
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 1-4, <strong>2013</strong><br />
M<strong>IN</strong>I REVIEW<br />
Biodiversity and Its Responsibility in Biotechnology : A Review<br />
V.K. MISHRA 1 AND D.K. DWIVEDI<br />
Department of Plant Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering, N.D. University of Agriculture and<br />
Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad 224 229 (U.P.)<br />
e-mail: vinay.mishra111@gmail.com 1<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Biodiversity is threatened by agriculture as a whole, and<br />
particularly also by traditional methods of agriculture.<br />
Knowledge-based agriculture, including GM crops, can reduce<br />
this threat in the future. The introduction of no-tillage practices,<br />
which are beneficial for soil fertility, has been encouraged by<br />
the rapid spread of herbicide tolerant soybeans in the USA.<br />
The replacement of pesticides through Bt crops is advantageous<br />
for the nontarget insect fauna in test-fields. Biodiversity<br />
differences can mainly be referred to as differences in herbicide<br />
application management. Biotechnology, while controversial<br />
particularly in agricultural applications, has the potential to<br />
improve sustainability in several ways and is expected, thereby,<br />
to help maintain natural as well as agricultural biodiversity.<br />
This paper results from the combined contributions of scientists,<br />
industrialists , and go vernmental a nd public intere st<br />
organisations across Asia.<br />
Key words<br />
Biodiversity, GM crops, Ecosystem diversity, in-situ,<br />
Agro diversity<br />
Biodiversity is the total richness of biological variation<br />
in the all the species of plants, animals and microorganism<br />
and the variation between them. Biodiversity is important for<br />
several very different reasons: the intrinsic value of species<br />
in the wild, the many varieties of plants, animals and microorganisms<br />
used worldwide for farming and other human<br />
activities, as a genetic resource in healthcare, agriculture and<br />
food production, as well as for aesthetic and recreational<br />
purposes. Biotechnology involves the use of all life forms for<br />
human welfare. Therefore, extinction of wild species and<br />
destruction of ecosystems has been a major concern of policy<br />
makers and biotechnologists alike.<br />
It is estimated that approximately 5-30 million species<br />
existing in the living forms. About 6% of the identified species<br />
live in boreal or polar latitudes, 59% in the temperate zones<br />
and the remaining 35% in tropics. It include 300000 species of<br />
green plants and fungi, 360000 species of micro-organism,<br />
800000 species of insect and 40000 species of vertebrates.<br />
Biotechnology has the clear potential to save native<br />
untouched land, particularly in tropical rain forests, by<br />
reducing or eliminating the pressure to bring more land into<br />
cultivation. Tropical insect species are difficult to identify<br />
because most are confined to a single type of tropical forest<br />
or even to a particular tree species, which may itself have only<br />
a local distribution. Additionally, the species may have limited<br />
Dr. Vinay Kumar Mishra has done Ph.D.<br />
in Agriculture Biotechnology from Narendra<br />
Deva University of Agriculture &<br />
Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad (U.P.).<br />
Presently he is working as lecturer in (Agri.<br />
Biotechnology), Division of Crop Sciences,<br />
Mahatma Gandhi Chitrakoot Gramodaya<br />
Vis hwavidyalaya, Chitrakoot, Satna,<br />
(M.P.). He attaineded six International and<br />
National Seminars and pub lished 11<br />
research papers, 2 review articles, 16 abstract papers and 16<br />
Hindi articles.<br />
Dr. D.K. Dwivedi has done Ph.D. and Post<br />
Doctoral Fellow from International Rice<br />
Research Institute, Philippines. Presently<br />
he is working as Associate Professor (Plant<br />
Biotechnology) Department of Plant<br />
Molecular Biolo gy and Genetic<br />
Engineering, N.D. University of Agriculture<br />
and Tec hnology, Narendra Nagar<br />
(Kumarganj), Faizabad, U.P., India. His<br />
professional experience is about more than<br />
24 years and to his credit 111 research<br />
papers includeing book chapters, bulletins and manuals. Dr.<br />
Dwivedi released 4 varieties namely Narendra Salinity Hybrid<br />
Rice 3, Narendra Hybrid Rice 2, UPRI 95-167 TGMS line and<br />
UPRI 95-140 TGMS line. He is associated in 4 projects as PI/<br />
Co-PI and awarded Best Research Paper at Symposium on<br />
Molecular Approaches for Crop Improvement (7-8 Feb., 2007),<br />
NDUAT, Faizabad, India and also, Rockefeller Foundation Postdoctoral<br />
Fellowship.<br />
dispersal ability. Some 470-495 million species are now<br />
extinction is a fact of life.<br />
Types of biodiversity<br />
Biodiversity includes (1) genetic diversity, (2) species<br />
diversity and (3) ecosystem diversity.<br />
(A) Genetic Diversity<br />
Genetic diversity is usually important not only for the<br />
survival and evolution of species, it is also important to people<br />
for breeding improved crop plants with higher yields. This is<br />
because genetic erosion of several crops has already occurred,<br />
leading to the world’s dependence for food on just a few<br />
species.<br />
Economic Potential and Conservation of Medicinal and
2 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
Aromatic Plants from Brazil Approximately 2/3 of the biological<br />
diversity of the world is estimated to be in tropical zones,<br />
mainly in developing countries. With nearly 55,000 native<br />
species, Brazil is considered the country with the greatest<br />
biodiversity on the planet. These species are distributed over<br />
six major distinct biomes: Amazon (30,000); Cerrado (7,000);<br />
Caatinga (4,000); Atlantic rainforest (16,000), Pantanal (10,000)<br />
and the subtropical forest (3,000) India is a major center of<br />
origin and diversity of crop and medicinal plants. India poses<br />
out 20,000 species of higher plants, one third of it being<br />
endemic and 500 species are categorized to have medicinal<br />
value (Krishnan, et al., 2011).<br />
(B) Species Diversity<br />
This diversity includes the variation of species within<br />
the particular region. Each of these biological communities’<br />
represents and adaptation of plants to particular regimes of<br />
climate, soil and other aspects of the environment. Global<br />
biodiversity is frequently expressed as the total number of<br />
species currently living on Earth, i.e., its species richness.<br />
Between about 1.5 to 1.75 million species have been discovered<br />
and scientifically described (LeCointre and Guyader,<br />
2001; Cracraft, 2002). Species richness and species evenness<br />
are probably the most frequently used measures of the total<br />
biodiversity of a region. Species diversity is also described in<br />
terms of the phylogenetic diversity, or evolutionary<br />
relatedness, of the species present in an area.<br />
(C) Ecosystem Diversity<br />
An ecosystem is a community plus the physical<br />
environment that it occupies at a given time. An ecosystem<br />
can exist at any scale, for example, from the size of a small tide<br />
pool up to the size of the entire biosphere. However, lakes,<br />
marshes, and forest stands represent more typical examples<br />
of the areas that are compared in discussions of ecosystem<br />
diversity. Ecosystem diversity refers to the diversity of a place<br />
at the level of ecosystems. The term differs from biodiversity,<br />
which refers to variation in species rather than ecosystems.<br />
Table 1. Gene banks of various crops in India<br />
Crop species<br />
Location of gene bank centre<br />
Wheat<br />
DWR, Karnal (Haryana)<br />
Rice<br />
CRRI, Cuttack (Orissa)<br />
Potato<br />
CPRI, Shimla (Himachal Pradesh)<br />
Cotton<br />
CICR, Nagpur (Maharashtra)<br />
Sugarcane<br />
SBI, Coimbatore (Tamil Nadu)<br />
Tobacco<br />
CTRI, Rajahmundry (Andhra Pradesh)<br />
Pulses<br />
IIPR, Kanpur, (Uttar Pradesh)<br />
Forage Crops<br />
IGFRI, Jhansi<br />
Plantation Crops<br />
CPCRI,Kasargod, (Kerala)<br />
Tuber Crops (except Potato) CTCRI, Trivandrum (Kerala)<br />
Oilseed Crops<br />
DOR, Hyderabad (Andhra Pradesh)<br />
Horticultural Crops IIHR, Bangalore (Karnataka)<br />
Sorghum<br />
NRC Sorghum, Hyderabad (Andhra<br />
Pradesh)<br />
Groundnut<br />
NRC Groundnut, Junagadh (Gujarat)<br />
Soybean<br />
NRC Soybean, Indore (Madhya Pradesh)<br />
Maize<br />
IARI, New Delhi<br />
Ecosystem diversity can also refer to the variety of<br />
ecosystems present in a biosphere, the variety of species and<br />
ecological processes that occur in different physical settings.<br />
Environmental disturbance on a variety of temporal and<br />
spatial scales can affect the species richness and,<br />
consequently, the diversity of an ecosystem. Ecosystems may<br />
be classified according to the dominant type of environment,<br />
or dominant type of species present; for example, a salt marsh<br />
ecosystem, a rocky shore intertidal ecosystem, a mangrove<br />
swamp ecosystem. Because temperature is an important aspect<br />
in shaping ecosystem diversity, it is also used in ecosystem<br />
classification (e.g., cold winter deserts, versus warm deserts)<br />
(Udvardy, 1975).<br />
Genetic modification and the sourcing of genes<br />
In vitro technology formed a prerequisite for the<br />
development of genetic modification of plants. Genetic<br />
modification of plants combines techniques for plant tissue<br />
culture, techniques for cloning, in vitro amplification (PCR),<br />
and transfer of DNA, either by the use of the soil bacterium<br />
Agrobacterium tumefaciens as a vector, through<br />
electroporation or by the use of a particle gun. It is based on<br />
the ability to change the genetic constitution of a single cell<br />
and regenerate a new plant from that single cell. The<br />
technology can be used to transfer a gene from a wild relative<br />
simply to speed up breeding, but it can also be used for the<br />
transfer of genes into the plant gene pool that could not be<br />
introduced into plant genomes by other means.<br />
Molecular marker technology has been used to identify<br />
genotypes and to confirm intergeneric hybrids between<br />
papaya and related Vasconcellea species. Molecular maps have<br />
been developed for some species. Genetic diversity within<br />
populations and between related wild species has been<br />
determined for some fruits. Specific DAF markers have been<br />
identified for sex determination in papaya; a SCAR marker has<br />
been developed to identify dwarfism in bananas; and, a CAPS<br />
marker to identify a PRSV-P resistant gene in highland papaya.<br />
The major application in genomics has been the rapid progress<br />
in sequencing the papaya genome in Hawaii (Drew, 2008).<br />
In 1999 more than 70 transgenic crop varieties were<br />
registered for commercial cultivation. The crops involved<br />
include corn, soybean, rapeseed, tomato, tobacco, potato,<br />
chicory, papaya, pumpkin and clover. In 2005, biotech soybean<br />
continued to be the principal biotech crop, occupying 54.4<br />
million hectares (60% of global biotech area), followed by<br />
maize (21.2 million hectares at 24%), cotton (9.8 million hectares<br />
at 11%) and canola (4.6 million hectares at 5% of global biotech<br />
crop area). During the first decade, 1996 to 2005, herbicide<br />
tolerance has consistently been the dominant trait followed<br />
by insect resistance and stacked genes for the two traits (James,<br />
2005). In the future diversification may be expected not only<br />
from the private sector, but also from the (international) public<br />
sector. The CGIAR Challenge programme Generation focuses<br />
on drought tolerance in cereals, legumes and clonal crops.
MISHRA & DWIVEDI, Biodiversity and its responsibility in biotechnology: A review 3<br />
Genetic modification efforts of the M.S. Swaminathan<br />
Foundation regard combating drought and salinity in locally<br />
adapted rice and wheat varieties, whereas the Indian Initiative<br />
on Crop Biofortification focuses on bio-availability and bioefficacy<br />
with respect to iron, zinc and phosphor in rice, wheat<br />
and maize.<br />
Native biodiversity and biotechnology<br />
Biodiversity in the wild has been massively reduced in<br />
the industrialised countries over many centuries and about<br />
half the tropical rain forests have already been destroyed.<br />
Yields of cereals in LDCs have gone up very considerably in<br />
the last forty years primarily as the result of the Green<br />
Revolution. However, the annual growth increases in cereal<br />
yields in LDCs have slowed down from about 3% during 1967-<br />
82 to about 1% per year from 1993 onwards. This lowering of<br />
the rate at which yields have increased means that productivity<br />
will probably not keep up with the demands of increased<br />
populations. The consequences for biodiversity are<br />
devastating as more land will be required for farming which<br />
will primarily come from areas with high native biodiversity,<br />
and in particular tropical rain forests.<br />
The single most promising way to avoid habitat<br />
destruction is to increase farm yields in a process that has<br />
been called the “Second Green Revolution”. Several<br />
components will be required including training and education<br />
of farmers (in particular of women who do most of the farm<br />
work in LDCs), more favourable economic and political<br />
climates, availability of farm credit schemes, etc. In addition,<br />
technical contributions will be necessary and, in particular,<br />
improved seed produced either by traditional crop breeding<br />
or by modern biotechnology. Reliance will have to be more on<br />
the latter since traditional breeding appears to have reached a<br />
plateau in yield and is slower, less precise and only feasible<br />
when interbreeding is possible. So agricultural biotechnology,<br />
which is viewed frequently in the public debate as harmful to<br />
biodiversity, is, paradoxically, likely to contribute to conserving<br />
it. A more limited concern that largely affects Northern Europe<br />
is the conservation of native plants and animals, in particular<br />
birds, in farmed areas. Their habitats are fields, hedges,<br />
roadsides and fallow land where they depend for food on<br />
insects and seeds produced by weeds in or near crops.<br />
Computer models suggest that more intense weed control<br />
measures may lead to smaller amounts of seeds being available<br />
to birds. This depends far more on weed management regimes<br />
rather than on transgenic plants. Herbicide tolerant beets allow<br />
farmers to control weeds later by treating after the seedlings<br />
have emerged. The more efficient methods may allow setting<br />
aside of more land. Setting aside more farmland requires<br />
financial incentives.<br />
Impact of agricultural biotechnology on biodiversity<br />
With the introduction of GM crops, concern has been<br />
raised that overall genetic diversity within crop species will<br />
decrease because breeding programs will concentrate on a<br />
smaller number of high value cultivars. However, several<br />
studies have specifically focused on this subject and they<br />
have concluded that the introduction of transgenic cultivars<br />
in agriculture has not significantly affected levels of genetic<br />
diversity within crop species. For example Sneller, 2003 looked<br />
at the genetic structure of the elite soybean population in<br />
North America, using coefficient of parentage (CP) analysis.<br />
The introduction of herbicide-tolerant cultivars with the<br />
Roundup Readyw [Monsanto http://www.monsanto.com/<br />
monsanto/layout/ products/productivity/ roundup/<br />
default.asp) trait was shown to have had little effect on<br />
soybean genetic diversity because of the widespread use of<br />
the trait in many breeding programs. Only 1% of the variation<br />
in CP among lines was related to differences between<br />
conventional and herbicide-tolerant lines, whereas 19% of<br />
the variation among northern lines and 14% of the variation<br />
among southern lines was related to differences among the<br />
lines from different companies and breeding programs.<br />
Similarly, when Bowman, et al., 2003 examined genetic<br />
uniformity among cotton varieties in the USA, they found<br />
that genetic uniformity had not changed significantly with<br />
the introduction of transgenic cotton cultivars. Genetic<br />
uniformity actually decreased by 28% over the period of<br />
introduction of transgenic cultivars. In conclusion,<br />
biotechnology represents a tool for enhancing genetic<br />
diversity in crop species through the introduction of novel<br />
genes. This does not aim at the single transgene inserted, but<br />
is based on the fact that beneficial characters can now be<br />
inserted in a variety of crops that have been neglected because<br />
of the limitations of traditional breeding methods, which failed<br />
to enhance the traits. There is great potential to achieve drought<br />
tolerance in vegetables (Slabbert, 2004) and to avoid postharvest<br />
losses in African grain staple crops.<br />
Impact of biotechnology on agro biodiversity<br />
Biotechnology has provided tools to more effectively<br />
maintain and utilize genetic resources ex situ as well as onfarm,<br />
and has thus contributed positively to the conservation<br />
of genetic resources. A limited contribution of biotechnology<br />
to the development of novel genetic resources in agroecosystems<br />
may also emerge in the near future, as a result of<br />
introgression of novel traits by means of genetic modification.<br />
However, the increasing role of biotechnology also forms a<br />
potential threat to the survival of agrobiodiversity in the<br />
environment, whether this is in the farmer’s field (on-farm), or<br />
in natural ecosystems (in situ). The impact of biotechnology<br />
on agrobiodiversity retains several components, which are<br />
very different in nature but do closely interrelate. While new<br />
technological developments take place at a rapid pace, their<br />
environmental and social implications are not well understood,<br />
let alone under control. Biological, socio-economic and<br />
cultural effects can be distinguished, and the various<br />
biotechnological applications differ strongly in the degree
4 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
and direction of their effect. Similarly, technological risks can<br />
be distinguished into two types: technology inherent risks<br />
concern the risks to human health, ecology, and the<br />
environment, and technology derived risks which are the result<br />
of the specific use of the technology, either reducing or<br />
enhancing the poverty gap, reducing or protecting<br />
biodiversity, and centralising or decentralising the control over<br />
and access to technology and its products.<br />
The risk of biodiversity loss is evident if we continue to<br />
experience the current trend for predatory and unregulated<br />
exploitation of living natural resources. Biodiversity has value<br />
for Science, and this value transcends merely subjective<br />
arguments. Brazil has a significant importance in biodiversity<br />
conservation due to the magnitude of its biological diversity.<br />
The Pantanal is a wetland system with a variety of ecosystems<br />
due to the seasonal flooding, and is recognized as one of the<br />
most important biodiversity biomes (Alho and Gonçalves,<br />
2005). It is well recognized that Brazil is important in the<br />
scientific value of biodiversity because of the size of its<br />
territory, the diversity of its biomes, the size of its river system,<br />
the concept of a mega diverse country, and the biodiversity<br />
hotspots identified, with a large and continuous continental<br />
biota. The estimated size of known or recorded Brazilian biota<br />
is around 200,000 species, representing about 10% of the<br />
world’s known number of species. These numbers may<br />
increase dramatically considering that the Neotropics<br />
constitutes, so far, one of the least studied regions. There are<br />
over 55,000 species of flora (without fungi species),<br />
representing nearly 20% of the world’s flora. Brazilian biomes<br />
hold an immense number of terrestrial invertebrates, including<br />
26,000 Lepidoptera, 12,000 Hymenoptera, 30,000 Coleoptera<br />
and so on. The number of amphibians (765 species) makes the<br />
country a leader in this taxon’s diversity. Reptiles comprise<br />
600 species, including 350 species of snakes (Lewinshon and<br />
Prado, 2006).<br />
The issues involved in the interaction between<br />
biodiversity and biotechnology have far-reaching<br />
consequences and need to be subject to an open and<br />
knowledge-based dialogue in society. The dialogue needs to<br />
include many different stakeholders, including farmers of<br />
developing countries, diverse scientists, policy makers and<br />
communicators. Cultural values involved in farming and food<br />
production needs to be taken into consideration, just as much<br />
as the emotional side of eating and drinking.<br />
A significant aspect of ethical behavior is openness.<br />
Transparent information is required both from scientists in<br />
non-commercial settings as well as from industry. Several large<br />
projects in biotechnology like HUGO, the Human Genome<br />
Organization, have an “ELSI” component, dealing with ethical,<br />
legal and societal implications of biotechnology. This shows<br />
that some scientists realize that science cannot be seen as a<br />
human activity taking place in a void, without any connection<br />
to social and political realities. Ethicists stress that it is the<br />
responsibility of scientists to be actively concerned with these<br />
issues and that they should take special responsibility in<br />
communicating with non-specialists to explain what they know<br />
as well as what they don’t know.<br />
The analysis focuses on (a) the political climate around<br />
GEs having been spread from Europe around the world; (b)<br />
the legal and trade consequences connected to regulation<br />
and political climate; (c) GMO over-regulation making use of<br />
GEs for the public sector inaccessible for cost and time<br />
reasons; (d) the financial support to professional anti-GElobby<br />
groups and (e) poor support for agricultural research in<br />
general (Potrykus Ingo, 2010).<br />
Preservation of the genetic diversity present in crop<br />
species is an important need being addressed by various public<br />
and private programs. In this respect, biotechnology can be a<br />
valuable tool for introducing novel (alien or non-alien) genes<br />
into underused crop traits and crop species. Furthermore, the<br />
development and introduction of GM crop varieties does not<br />
represent any greater risk to crop genetic diversity than the<br />
breeding programs associated with conventional agriculture.<br />
After all, the overall performance of a plant and the quality<br />
and quantity of its product is the result of thousands of genes<br />
and the genetic background is almost always more important<br />
for the questions dealt with in this review than a single<br />
transgene.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Alho, C.J.R. and Gonçalves, H.C. 2005. Biodiversidade do Pantanal.<br />
Ecologia e Conservacaoo. Campo Grande: Editora UNIDERP. ISBN:<br />
858739294-8. pp.142.<br />
Bowman, D.T., May, O.L. and Creech, J.B. 2003. Genetic uniformity<br />
of the US upland cotton crop since the introduction of transgenic<br />
cottons. Crop Sci., 43:515–518.<br />
Brown, T. and Johnes, G. 2003. New ways with old wheat – Part I,<br />
Archaeology University of Sheffield.<br />
Cracraft, C. 2002. Species concepts and speciation analysis. Ornithology<br />
1:159-187.<br />
Drew, R.A. 2008. Applications of Biotechnology to Tropical Fruit Crops<br />
in Australia and Worldwide. Acta Horticulturae, No. 787.<br />
James, C. 2005. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops:<br />
2004”, ISAAA (www.isaaa.org).<br />
Krishnan, P.N., Decruse, S.W. and Radha, R.K. 2011. Conservation of<br />
Medicinal Plants of Western Ghats, India and its Sustainable<br />
Utilization through in vitro Technology. In Vitro Cellular and<br />
Developmental Biology: Plant., 47(1):110-122.<br />
Lecointre, G. and Guyader, H.L. 2001. Classification phylogenetique<br />
du vivant. Paris, France: Belin.<br />
Lewinshon, T.M. and Prado, P.I. 2006. How many species are there in<br />
Brazil? Conservation Biology, 19(3): 619-624.<br />
Potrykus, I. 2010. Constraints to Biotechnology Introduction for<br />
Poverty Alleviation. New Biotechnology, 27(5):447-448.<br />
Slabbert, R. 2004. Drought tolerance, traditional crops and<br />
biotechnology: breeding towards sustainable development. South<br />
African J. Botany, 70: 116-123.<br />
Sneller, C.H. 2003. Impact of transgenic genotypes and subdivision on<br />
diversity within elite North American soybean germplasm. Crop<br />
Sci., 43: 409-414.<br />
Udvardy, M.D.F. 1975. A classification of the biogeographical provinces<br />
of the world. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for the<br />
Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.<br />
Recieved on 12-08-2012 Accepted on 02-12-2012
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 5-13, <strong>2013</strong><br />
M<strong>IN</strong>I REVIEW<br />
Physiological, Biochemical and Molecular Changes during High Temperature in<br />
Plants – A Review<br />
KSHITIJ KUMAR AND I.U. RAO<br />
Department of Botany University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007<br />
e-mail: patelbiotech@gmail.com<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Heat stress is often defined as the rise in temperature beyond<br />
a threshold level for a period of time sufficient to cause<br />
irreversible damage to plant growth and development. In<br />
general, a transient elevation in temperature, usually 10-15<br />
o<br />
C above ambient, is considered heat shock or heat stress.<br />
However, heat stress is a complex function of intensity<br />
(temperature in degrees), duration, and rate of increase in<br />
temperature. The extent to which it occurs in specific climatic<br />
zo nes depe nds on the proba bility and period o f high<br />
temperatures occurring during the day and/or the night. Heat<br />
tolerance is generally defined as the ability of the plant to<br />
grow and produce economic yield under high temperatures.<br />
However, while some res earc hers believe tha t night<br />
temperatures are major limiting factors others have argued<br />
that day and night temperatures do not affect the plant<br />
independently, and that the diurnal mean’ temperature is a<br />
better predictor of plant response to high temperature with day<br />
temperature having a secondary role.<br />
Key word<br />
Heat stress, Temperature, Heat shock Proteins<br />
Heat stress due to high ambient temperatures is a serious<br />
threat to crop production worldwide. Gaseous emissions due<br />
to human activities are substantially adding to the existing<br />
concentrations of greenhouse gases, particularly CO2,<br />
methane, chlorofluorocarbons and nitrous oxides. Different<br />
global circulation models predict that greenhouse gases will<br />
gradually increase world’s average ambient temperature.<br />
According to a report of the Intergovernmental Panel on<br />
Climatic Change (IPCC), global mean temperature will rise 0.3<br />
?C per decade reaching to approximately 1 and3 ?C above the<br />
present value by years 2025 and 2100, respectively, and leading<br />
to global warming. Rising temperatures may lead to altered<br />
geographical distribution and growing season of agricultural<br />
crops by allowing the threshold temperature for the start of<br />
the season and crop maturity to reach earlier. At very high<br />
temperatures, severe cellular injury and even cell death may<br />
occur within minutes, which could be attributed to a<br />
catastrophic collapse of cellular organization (Sch¨offl, et al.,<br />
1999). At moderately high temperatures, injuries or death may<br />
occur only after long-term exposure. Direct injuries due to<br />
high temperatures include protein denaturation and<br />
aggregation, and increased fluidity of membrane lipids. Indirect<br />
or slower heat injuries include inactivation of enzymes in<br />
chloroplast and mitochondria, inhibition of protein synthesis,<br />
Mr Kshitij Kumar is a research Scholar<br />
at Department of Plant Molecular<br />
Biology Narendra Deva University of<br />
Agriculture & Technology Narendra<br />
Nagar (Kumarganj) Faizabad Uttar<br />
Pradesh India. Mr Kshitij Kumar has<br />
completed M.Sc. (Agriculture) in<br />
Agricultural Biotechnology from<br />
Narendra Deva University of<br />
Agriculture & Technology Narendra Nagar (Kumarganj)<br />
Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. He has completed his M.Phil.<br />
(Botany) from Department of Botany University of Delhi<br />
under supervision of Prof. I.U. Rao.<br />
protein degradation and loss of membrane integrity (Howarth,<br />
2005).<br />
Effect of temperature at cellular level<br />
Dr. I.U. Rao is a ex-Professor of Botany<br />
at University of Delhi, Delhi. She has<br />
three decades experience of teaching<br />
and research and guiding several<br />
M.Phil. and Ph.D. students. She was<br />
Head, Dean and Proctor of University<br />
of Delhi. She has published many<br />
national and International papers in<br />
reputed journals. She has been involved<br />
in several research projects.<br />
At very high temperatures, severe cellular injury and<br />
even cell death may occur within minutes, which could be<br />
attributed to a catastrophic collapse of cellular organization<br />
(Schoffl et. al., 1999). At moderately high temperatures, injuries<br />
or death may occur only after long-term exposure. Direct<br />
injuries due to high temperatures include protein denaturation<br />
and aggregation, and increased fluidity of membrane lipids.<br />
Indirect or slower heat injuries include inactivation of enzymes<br />
in chloroplast and mitochondria, inhibition of protein<br />
synthesis, protein degradation and loss of membrane integrity<br />
(Howarth, 2005). Heat stress also affects the organization of<br />
microtubules by splitting and/or elongation of spindles,<br />
formation of microtubule asters in mitotic cells, and elongation<br />
of phragmoplast microtubules (Smertenko, et. al., 1997). These<br />
injuries eventually lead to starvation, inhibition of growth,
6 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
Table 1.<br />
Genetically engineered alterations in the temperature stress tolerance of plants<br />
Functions of transformed genes Host plants Effects on the enhancement of temperature Remarks References<br />
Heat shock proteins<br />
Heat shock transcription factor (ATHSF1) Arabidopsis High temperatures (enhanced) Heat-inducible Lee, et al., 1995.<br />
Heat shock protein (Hsp70) Arabidopsis High temperatures(lessened) antisense expression Lee JH, Sch¨offl F. 1996.<br />
Small heat shock protein (Hsp17.7) Carrot High temperatures (enhanced/lessened) Constitutive Malik, et al., 1999<br />
reduced ion flux, production of toxic compounds and reactive<br />
oxygen species (ROS) (Howarth, 2005).<br />
Effect of temperature at molecular level<br />
Immediately after exposure to high temperatures and<br />
perception of signals, changes occur at the molecular level<br />
altering the expression of genes and accumulation of<br />
transcripts, thereby leading to the synthesis of stress-related<br />
proteins as a stress-tolerance strategy (Iba, 2002). Expression<br />
of heat shock proteins (HSPs) is known to be an important<br />
adaptive strategy in this regard (Wahid, et. al., 2007). The<br />
HSPs, ranging in molecular mass from about 10 to 200 kDa,<br />
have chaperone-like functions and are involved in signal<br />
transduction during heat stress (Schoffl et. al., 1999). The<br />
tolerance conferred by HSPs results in improved physiological<br />
phenomena such as photosynthesis, assimilate partitioning,<br />
water and nutrient use efficiency, and membrane stability<br />
(Momcilovic & Ristic, 2007).<br />
Heat-stress threshold<br />
A threshold temperature refers to a value of daily mean<br />
temperature at which a detectable reduction in growth begins.<br />
Upper and lower developmental threshold temperatures have<br />
been determined for many plant species through controlled<br />
laboratory and field experiments. A lower developmental<br />
threshold or a base temperature is one below which plant<br />
growth and development stops. Similarly, an upper<br />
developmental threshold is the temperature above which<br />
growth and development ceases. Knowledge of lower<br />
threshold temperatures is important in physiological research<br />
as well as for crop production. Base threshold temperatures<br />
vary with plant species, but for cool season crops, 0°C is<br />
often the best-predicted base temperature (Miller et. al., 2001).<br />
Cool season and temperate crops often have lower threshold<br />
temperature values compared to tropical crops. Upper<br />
threshold temperatures also differ for different plant species<br />
and genotypes within species. However, determining a<br />
consistent upper threshold temperature is difficult because<br />
the plant behavior may differ depending on other<br />
environmental conditions (Miller et. al., 2001). In tomato, for<br />
example, when the ambient temperature exceeds 35°C, its seed<br />
germination, seedling and vegetative growth, flowering and<br />
fruit set, and fruit ripening are adversely affected.<br />
High temperature induces modifications in plants which<br />
may be direct as on existing physiological processes or indirect<br />
in altering the pattern of development. These responses may<br />
differ from one phenological stage to another. For example,<br />
long-term effects of heat stress on developing seeds may<br />
include delayed germination or loss of vigor, ultimately leading<br />
to reduced emergence and seedling establishment. Under<br />
diurnally varying temperatures, coleoptile growth in maize<br />
reduced at 40 o C and ceased at 45 o C (Weaich et. al., 1996).<br />
High temperatures caused significant declines in shoot dry<br />
mass, relative growth rate and net assimilation rate in maize,<br />
pearl millet and sugarcane, though leaf expansions were<br />
minimally affected (Wahid, 2007). Major impact of high<br />
temperatures on shoot growth is a severe reduction in the<br />
first internode length resulting in premature death of plants<br />
(Wahid et. al., 2007). For example, sugarcane plants grown<br />
under high temperatures exhibited smaller internodes,<br />
increased tillering, early senescence, and reduced total<br />
biomass (Wahid et. al., 2007).<br />
Heat stress, singly or in combination with drought, is a<br />
common constraint during anthesis and grain filling stages in<br />
many cereal crops of temperate regions. For example, heat<br />
stress lengthened the duration of grain filling with reduction<br />
in kernel growth leading to losses in kernel density and weight<br />
by up to 7% in spring wheat (Guilioni et. al., 2003). Similar<br />
reductions occurred in starch, protein and oil contents of the<br />
maize kernel (Wilhelm et. al., 1999) and grain quality in other<br />
cereals under heat stress (Maestri et. al., 2002). In wheat,<br />
both grain weight and grain number appeared to be sensitive<br />
to heat stress, as the number of grains per year at maturity<br />
declined with increasing temperature (Ferris et. al., 1998).<br />
Growth chamber and greenhouse studies suggest that<br />
high temperature is most deleterious when flowers are first<br />
visible and sensitivity continues for 10-15 days. Reproductive<br />
phases most sensitive to high temperature are gametogenesis<br />
(8-9 days before anthesis) and fertilization (1-3 days after<br />
anthesis) in various plants (Foolad, 2005).<br />
Effect of temperature on anatomy<br />
Although limited details are available, anatomical<br />
changes under high ambient temperatures are generally similar<br />
to those under drought stress. At the whole plant level, there<br />
is a general tendency of reduced cell size, closure of stomata<br />
and curtailed water loss, increased stomatal and trichomatous<br />
densities, and greater xylem vessels of both root and shoot<br />
(Anon et. al., 2004). In grapes (Vitis vinifera), heat stress<br />
severely damaged the mesophyll cells and increased<br />
permeability of plasma membrane (Zhang et. al., 2005). With<br />
the onset of high temperature regime, Zygophyllum qatarense<br />
produced polymorphic leaves and tended to reduce<br />
transpirational water loss by showing bimodal stomatal
KUMAR AND RAO, Physiological, Biochemical and Molecular Changes during High Temperature in Plants–A Review 7<br />
behavior (Sayed, 1996). At the subcellular level, major<br />
modifications occur in chloroplasts, leading to significant<br />
changes in photosynthesis. For example, high temperatures<br />
reduced photosynthesis by changing the structural<br />
organization of thylakoids (Karim et. al., 1997). Studies have<br />
revealed that specific effects of high temperatures on<br />
photosynthetic membranes result in the loss of grana stacking<br />
or its swelling. In response to heat stress, chloroplasts in the<br />
mesophyll cells of grape plants became round, the stroma<br />
lamellae became swollen, and the contents of vacuoles formed<br />
clumps, whilst the cristae were disrupted and mitochondria<br />
became empty (Zhang et. al., 2005).<br />
Effect of temperature on phenology<br />
Observation of changes in plant phenology in response<br />
to heat stress can reveal a better understanding of interactions<br />
between stress atmosphere and the plant. Different<br />
phenological stages vary in their sensitivity to high<br />
temperature; however, this depends on species and genotype<br />
as there are great inter-and intra-specific variations (Howarth,<br />
2005). Heat stress is a major factor affecting the rate of plant<br />
development, which may be increasing to a certain limit and<br />
decrease afterwards (Howarth, 2005).<br />
Vulnerability of species and cultivars to high<br />
temperatures may vary with the stage of plant development,<br />
but all vegetative and reproductive stages are affected by<br />
heat stress to some extent. During vegetative stage, for<br />
example, high day temperature can damage leaf gas exchange<br />
properties. During reproduction, a short period of heat stress<br />
can cause significant increases in floral buds and crop<br />
production under high temperatures.<br />
Effect of temperature on physiology<br />
Plant water status is most important variable under<br />
changing ambient temperatures (Mazorra et. al., 2002). In<br />
general, plants tend to maintain stable tissue water status<br />
regardless of temperature when moisture is ample; however,<br />
high temperatures severely impair this tendency when water<br />
is limiting (Wahid et. al., 2007). Under field conditions, high<br />
temperature stress is frequently associated with reduced water<br />
availability (Simoes-Araujo et. al., 2003). In Lotus creticus,<br />
for example, elevated night temperatures caused a greater<br />
reduction in leaf water potential of water-stressed as compared<br />
to non-stressed plants (Anon et. al., 2004). In sugarcane, leaf<br />
water potential and its components were changed upon<br />
exposure to heat stress even though the soil water supply<br />
and relative humidity conditions were optimal, implying an<br />
effect of heat stress on root hydraulic conductance (Wahid &<br />
Close, 2007). Similarly, in tomato, heat stress perturbed the<br />
leaf water relations and root hydraulic conductivity (Morales<br />
et. al., 2003).<br />
A key adaptive mechanism in many plants grown under<br />
abiotic stresses, including salinity, water deficit and extreme<br />
temperatures, is accumulation of certain organic compounds<br />
of low molecular mass, generally referred to as compatible<br />
osmolytes (Sakamoto & Murata, 2002). Under stress, different<br />
plant species may accumulate a variety of osmolytes such as<br />
sugars and sugar alcohols (polyols), proline, tertiary and<br />
quaternary ammonium compounds, and tertiary sulphonium<br />
compounds (Sairam & Tyagi, 2004). Accumulation of such<br />
solutes may contribute to enhanced stress tolerance of plants,<br />
as briefly described below.<br />
Glycinebetaine (GB), an amphoteric quaternary amine,<br />
plays an important role as a compatible solute in plants under<br />
various stresses, such as salinity or high temperature<br />
(Sakamoto & Murata, 2002). Capacity to synthesize GB under<br />
stress conditions differs from species to species (Ashraf &<br />
Foolad, 2007). For example, high level of GB accumulation<br />
was reported in maize (Quan et. al, 2004) and sugarcane<br />
(Wahid & Close, 2007) due to desiccating conditions of water<br />
deficit or high temperature.<br />
Like GB, proline is also known to occur widely in higher<br />
plants and normally accumulates in large quantities in response<br />
to environmental stresses (Kavi Kishore et. al., 2005). In<br />
assessing the functional significance of accumulation of<br />
compatible solutes, it is suggested that proline or GB synthesis<br />
may buffer cellular redox potential under heat and other<br />
environmental stresses (Wahid & Close, 2007). Similarly,<br />
accumulation of soluble sugars under heat stress has been<br />
reported in sugarcane, which entails great implications for<br />
heat tolerance (Wahid & Close, 2007). Under high<br />
temperatures, fruit set in tomato plants failed due to the<br />
disruption of sugar metabolism and proline transport during<br />
the narrow window of male reproductive development (Sato<br />
et. al., 2006).<br />
Among other osmolytes, g 7-4-aminobutyric acid<br />
(GABA), a non-protein amino acid, is widely distributed<br />
throughout the biological world to act as a compatible solute.<br />
GABA is synthesized from the glutamic acid by a single step<br />
reaction catalyzed by glutamate decarboxylase (GAD). An<br />
acidic pH activates GAD, a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of<br />
GABA. Episodes of high temperatures increase the cytosolic<br />
level of Ca, which leads to calmodulin-mediated activation of<br />
GAD (Taiz abd Zeiger, 2006). Several other studies show that<br />
various environmental stresses increase GABA accumulation<br />
through metabolic or mechanical disruptions, thus leading to<br />
cytosolic acidification.<br />
Effect of temperature on photosynthesis<br />
Increasing leaf temperature and photosynthetic photon<br />
flux density influence thermo tolerance adjustments of PSII,<br />
indicating their potential to optimize photosynthesis under<br />
varying environmental conditions as long as the upper thermal<br />
limits do not exceed (Marchand et. al., 2005). In tomato<br />
genotypes, differing in their capacity for thermotolerance as<br />
well as in sugarcane, an increased chlorophyll a/b ratio and a
8 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
decreased chlorophyll and carotenoids ratio were observed<br />
in the tolerant genotypes under high temperatures, indicating<br />
that these changes were related to thermotolerance of tomato<br />
(Wahid & Ghazanfar, 2006). Furthermore, under high<br />
temperatures, degradation of chlorophyll a and b was more<br />
pronounced in developed leaves compared to developing<br />
leaves (Karim et. al., 1999). Such effects on chlorophyll or<br />
photosynthetic apparatus were suggested to be associated<br />
with the production of active oxygen species (Camejo et. al.,<br />
2005).<br />
PSII is highly thermolabile, and its activity is greatly<br />
reduced or even partially stopped under high temperatures<br />
(Camejo et. al., 2005), which may be due to the properties of<br />
thylakoid membranes where PSII is located (McDonald &<br />
Paulsen, 1997). Heat stress may lead to the dissociation of<br />
Oxygen Evolving Complex (OEC), resulting in an imbalance<br />
between the electron flow from OEC toward the acceptor side<br />
of PSII in the direction of PSI reaction center (De Ronde et.<br />
al., 2004). Heat stress causes dissociation of manganese (Mn)-<br />
stabilizing 33-kDa protein at PSII reaction center complex<br />
followed by the release of Mn atoms (Yamane et. al., 1998).<br />
High temperature influences the photosynthetic<br />
capacity of C 3<br />
plants more strongly than in C 4<br />
plants. It alters<br />
the energy distribution and changes the activities of carbon<br />
metabolism enzymes, particularly the rubisco, thereby altering<br />
the rate of RuBP regeneration by the disruption of electron<br />
transport and inactivation of the oxygen evolving enzymes of<br />
PSII (Salvucci & Crafts-Brandner, 2004). Heat shock reduces<br />
the amount of photosynthetic pigments (Todorov et. al., 2003),<br />
soluble proteins, rubisco binding proteins (RBP) and large-<br />
(LS) and small-subunits (SS) of rubisco in darkness but<br />
increases them in light, indicating their roles as chaperones<br />
and HSPs (Wahid et. al., 2007).<br />
In any plant species, the ability to sustain leaf gas<br />
exchange under heat stress has a direct relationship with heat<br />
tolerance. During the vegetative stage, high day temperature<br />
can cause damage to compensated leaf photosynthesis,<br />
reducing CO 2<br />
assimilation rates (Wahid et. al., 2007). Increased<br />
temperatures curtail photosynthesis and increase CO 2<br />
transfer<br />
conductance between intercellular spaces and carboxylation<br />
sites. Stomatal conductance (gs) and net photosynthesis (Pn)<br />
are inhibited by moderate heat stress in many plant species<br />
due to decreases in the activation state of rubisco (Morales<br />
et. al., 2003). Although with an increase in temperature, rubisco<br />
catalytic activity increases, a low affinity of the enzyme for<br />
CO 2<br />
and its dual nature as an oxygenase limits the possible<br />
increases in Pn. For example, in maize the Pn was inhibited at<br />
leaf temperatures above 38 °C and inhibition was much more<br />
severe when temperature was increased abruptly rather than<br />
gradually. However, this inhibition was independent of<br />
stomatal response to high temperature (Crafts-Brander &<br />
Salvucci, 2002). Despite observed negative effects of high<br />
temperature, the optimum temperature for leaf photosynthesis<br />
is likely to increase with elevated levels of atmospheric CO 2<br />
.<br />
Assimilate partitioning<br />
It was determined that photosynthesis had a broad<br />
temperature optimum from 20 to 30°C, however, it declined<br />
rapidly at temperatures above 30°C. The rate of 14 C assimilate<br />
movement out of the flag leaf (phloem loading), was optimum<br />
around 30°C, however, the rate of movement through the stem<br />
was independent of temperature from 1 to 50°C. It was<br />
concluded that, at least in wheat, temperature effects on<br />
translocation result indirectly from temperature effects on<br />
source and sink activities. From such results, increased<br />
mobilization efficiency of reserves from stem or other plant<br />
parts has been suggested as a potential strategy to improve<br />
grain filling and yield in wheat, under heat stress. This<br />
suggestion, however, is based on present limited knowledge<br />
of physiological basis of assimilate partitioning under high<br />
temperature stress. Further investigation in this area may lead<br />
to improved crop production efficiency under high<br />
temperature stress.<br />
Effect of temperature on cell membrane thermostability<br />
Sustained function of cellular membranes under stress<br />
is pivotal for processes such as photosynthesis and<br />
respiration (Blum, 1988). Heat stress accelerates the kinetic<br />
energy and movement of molecules across membranes thereby<br />
loosening chemical bonds within molecules of biological<br />
membranes. This makes the lipid bilayer of biological<br />
membranes more fluid by either denaturation of proteins or an<br />
increase in unsaturated fatty acids (Savchenko et. al., 2002).<br />
The integrity and functions of biological membranes are<br />
sensitive to high temperature, as heat stress alters the tertiary<br />
and quaternary structures of membrane proteins. Such<br />
alterations enhance the permeability of membranes, as evident<br />
from increased loss of electrolytes. The increased solute<br />
leakage, as an indication of decreased cell membrane<br />
thermostability (CMT), has long been used as an indirect<br />
measure of heat stress tolerance in diverse plant species,<br />
including soybean (Martineau et. al., 1979), potato and tomato<br />
(Chen et. al., 1982), wheat (Blum et. al., 2001), cotton (Ashraf<br />
et. al., 1994), sorghum (Marcum, 1998), cowpea (Ismail & Hall,<br />
1999) and barley (Wahid et. al., 2007). Electrolyte leakage is<br />
influenced by plant/tissue age, sampling organ, developmental<br />
stage, growing season, degree of hardening and plant species.<br />
In maize, injuries to plasmalemma due to heat stress were much<br />
less severe in developing than in mature leaves (Karim et. al.,<br />
1997, 1999).<br />
Effect of temperature on hormonal changes<br />
Abscisic acid (ABA) and ethylene (C 2<br />
H 4<br />
), as stress<br />
hormones, are involved in the regulation of many<br />
physiological properties by acting as signal molecules.<br />
Different environmental stresses, including high temperature,<br />
result in increased levels of ABA. For example, recently it was
KUMAR AND RAO, Physiological, Biochemical and Molecular Changes during High Temperature in Plants–A Review 9<br />
determined that in creeping bentgrass (Agrostis palustris),<br />
ABA level did not rise during heat stress but it accumulated<br />
upon recovery from stress suggesting a role during the latter<br />
period (Larkindale & Huang, 2005). However, the action of<br />
ABA in response to stress involves modification of gene<br />
expression. Analysis of ABA-responsive promoters revealed<br />
several potential cis- and trans-acting regulatory elements<br />
(Swamy & Smith, 1999). ABA mediates acclimation/ adaptation<br />
of plants to desiccation by modulating the up- or downregulation<br />
of numerous genes (Xiong et. al., 2002). Under<br />
field conditions, where heat and drought stresses usually<br />
coincide, ABA induction is an important component of<br />
thermotolerance, suggesting its involvement in biochemical<br />
pathways essential for survival under heat-induced<br />
desiccation stress (Maestri et. al., 2002). Other studies also<br />
suggest that induction of several HSPs (HSP70) by ABA may<br />
be one mechanism whereby it confers thermotolerance (Pareek<br />
et. al., 1998). More so, heat shock transcription factor 3 acts<br />
synergistically with chimeric genes with a small HSP promoter,<br />
which is ABA inducible (Rojas, et. al., 1999).<br />
Heat stress changes ethylene production differently in<br />
different plant species (Arshad and Frankenberger, 2002). For<br />
example, while ethylene production in wheat leaves was<br />
inhibited slightly at 35°C and severely at 40°C, in soybean,<br />
ethylene production in hypocotyls increased by increasing<br />
temperature up to 40°C and it showed inhibition at 45°C.<br />
Despite the fact that ACC accumulated in both species at<br />
40°C, its conversion into ethylene occurred only in soybean<br />
hypocotyls but not in wheat. Wheat leaves transferred to 18<br />
°C followed by a short exposure to 40°C showed an increase<br />
in ethylene production after 1 h lag period, possibly due to<br />
conversion of accumulated ACC to ethylene during that period<br />
(Tan, et. al., 1988). Similarly, creeping bentgrass showed<br />
ethylene production upon recovery, but not when under heat<br />
stress (Larkindale and Huang, 2005). Temperatures up to 35°C<br />
have been shown to increase ethylene production and<br />
ripening of propylene-treated kiwifruit, but temperature above<br />
35°C inhibits ripening by inhibiting ethylene production,<br />
although respiration continues until the tissue disintegration<br />
(Antunes and Sfakiotakis, 2000).<br />
Among other hormones, salicylic acid (SA) has been<br />
suggested to be involved in heat-stress responses elicited by<br />
plants. Salicylic acid is an important component of signaling<br />
pathways in response to systemic acquired resistance (SAR)<br />
and the hypersensitive response (HR) (Kawano, et. al., 1998).<br />
SA stabilizes the trimers of heat shock transcription factors<br />
and aids them to bind heat shock elements to the promoter of<br />
heat shock related genes. Long-term thermotolerance can be<br />
induced by SA, in which both Ca 2+ homeostasis and<br />
antioxidant systems are thought to be involved (Wang and<br />
Li, 2006). Sulphosalicylic acid (SSA), a derivative of SA,<br />
treatment can effectively remove H 2<br />
O 2<br />
and increase heat<br />
tolerance. In this regard, catalase (CAT) plays a key role in<br />
removing H 2<br />
O 2<br />
in cucumber (Cucumus sativus) seedlings<br />
treated with SSA under heat stress. In contrast, while<br />
glutathione peroxidase (GPX), ascorbate peroxidase (APX)<br />
and glutathione reductase (GR) showed higher activities in all<br />
SSA treatments under heat stress, these were not key enzymes<br />
in removing H 2<br />
O 2<br />
(Wahid, et. al., 2007).<br />
Secondary metabolites<br />
Carotenoids are widely known to protect cellular<br />
structures in various plant species irrespective of the stress<br />
type (Wahid, 2007). For example, the xanthophyll cycle (the<br />
reversible interconversion of two particular carotenoids,<br />
violaxanthin and zeaxanthin) has evolved to play this essential<br />
role in photoprotection. Since zeaxanthin is hydrophobic, it is<br />
found mostly at the periphery of the light-harvesting<br />
complexes, where it functions to prevent peroxidative damage<br />
to the membrane lipids triggered by ROS (Horton, 2002). Recent<br />
studies have revealed that carotenoids of the xanthophyll<br />
family and some other terpenoids, such as isoprene or a-<br />
tocopherol, stabilize and photoprotect the lipid phase of the<br />
thylakoid membranes (Velikova, et. al., 2005). When plants<br />
are exposed to potentially harmful environmental conditions,<br />
such as strong light and/or elevated temperatures, the<br />
xanthophylls including violaxanthin and zeaxanthin partition<br />
between the light-harvesting complexes and the lipid phase<br />
of the thylakoid membranes. The resulting interaction of the<br />
xanthophyll molecules and the membrane lipids brings about<br />
a decreased fluidity (thermostability) of membrane and a<br />
lowered susceptibility to lipid peroxidation under high<br />
temperatures (Havaux, 1998).<br />
Phenolics, including flavonoids, anthocyanins, lignins,<br />
etc., are the most important class of secondary metabolites in<br />
plants and play a variety of roles including tolerance to abiotic<br />
stresses (Wahid, 2007). Studies suggest that accumulation of<br />
soluble phenolics under heat stress was accompanied with<br />
increased phenyl ammonia lyase (PAL) and decreased<br />
peroxidase and polyphenol lyase activities (Rivero, et. al.,<br />
2001). Anthocyanins, a subclass of flavonoid compounds,<br />
are greatly modulated in plant tissues by prevailing high<br />
temperature; low temperature increases and elevated<br />
temperature decreases their concentration in buds and fruits<br />
(Sachray, et. al., 2002). For example, high temperature<br />
decreases synthesis of anthocyanins in reproductive parts of<br />
red apples (Tomana and Yamada, 1988), chrysanthemums<br />
(Shibata, et. al., 1988) and asters (Sachray, et. al., 2002). One<br />
of the causes of low anthocyanin concentration in plants at<br />
high temperatures is a decreased rate of its synthesis and<br />
stability (Sachray, et. al., 2002). On the other hand, vegetative<br />
tissues under high temperature stress show an accumulation<br />
of anthocyanins including rose and sugarcane leaves (Wahid<br />
and Ghazanfar, 2006). It has been suggested that in addition<br />
to their role as UV screen, anthocyanins serve to decrease<br />
leaf osmotic potential, which is linked to increased uptake
10 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
and reduced transpirational loss of water under environmental<br />
stresses including high temperature (Chalker-Scott, 2002).<br />
These properties may enable the leaves to respond quickly to<br />
changing environmental conditions.<br />
Superoxide radical is regularly synthesized in the<br />
chloroplast and mitochondrion and some quantities are also<br />
produced in microbodies. The scavenging of O 2- by superoxide<br />
dismutase (SOD) results in the production of H 2<br />
O 2<br />
, which is<br />
removed by APX or CAT. However, both O 2- and H 2<br />
O 2<br />
are not<br />
as toxic as the (OH - ), which is formed by the combination of<br />
O 2- and H 2<br />
O 2<br />
in the presence of trace amounts of Fe 2+ and Fe 3+<br />
by the Haber-Weiss reaction. The OH - can damage chlorophyll,<br />
protein, DNA, lipids and other important macromolecules, thus<br />
fatally affecting plant metabolism and limiting growth and yield<br />
(Sairam & Tyagi, 2004).<br />
Plants have developed a series of both enzymatic and<br />
non-enzymatic detoxification systems to counteract AOS,<br />
thereby protecting cells from oxidative damage (Sairam and<br />
Tyagi, 2004). For example, over expression of SOD in plants<br />
affects a number of physiological phenomena, which include<br />
the removal of H 2<br />
O 2<br />
, oxidation of toxic reductants,<br />
biosynthesis and degradation of lignin in cell walls, auxin<br />
catabolism, defensive responses to wounding, defense against<br />
pathogen or insect attack, and some respiratory processes<br />
(Seandalios, 1993). More specifically, expression and activation<br />
of APX is related to the appearance of physiological injuries<br />
caused in plants by thermal stress (Mazorra et. al., 2002).<br />
Heat shock proteins<br />
Synthesis and accumulation of specific proteins are<br />
ascertained during a rapid heat stress, and these proteins are<br />
designated as HSPs. Increased production of HSPs occurs<br />
when plants experience either abrupt or gradual increase in<br />
temperature (Schoffl, et. al., 1999). Induction of HSPs seems<br />
to be a universal response to temperature stress, being<br />
observed in all organisms ranging from bacteria to human<br />
(Vierling, 1991). Plants of arid and semi-arid regions may<br />
synthesize and accumulate substantial amounts of HSPs.<br />
Certain HSPs are also expressed in some cells under cyclic or<br />
developmental control (Hopf, et. al., 1992). In this case, the<br />
expression of HSPs is restricted to certain stages of<br />
development, such as embryogenesis, germination, pollen<br />
development and fruit maturation (Prasinos, et. al., 2005).<br />
Three classes of proteins, as distinguished by molecular<br />
weight, account for most HSPs, viz., HSP90, HSP70 and low<br />
molecular weight proteins of 15-30 kDa. The special<br />
importance of small HSPs in plants is suggested by their<br />
unusual abundance and diversity. The proportions of these<br />
three classes differ among plant species. HSP70 and HSP90<br />
mRNAs can increase ten-fold, while low molecular weight<br />
(LMW) HSPs can increase as 200-fold. Other proteins, such<br />
as 110 kDa polypeptides and ubiquitin, though less important,<br />
are also considered to be HSPs (Feussner, et. al., 1997). All<br />
small-HSPs in plants are encoded by six nuclear gene families,<br />
each gene family corresponding to proteins found in distinct<br />
cellular compartments like cytosol, chloroplast, endoplasmic<br />
reticulum (ER), mitochondria and membranes. Some nuclearencoded<br />
HSPs accumulate in the cytosol at low (27°C) and<br />
high (43°C) temperatures, but they accumulate in chloroplast<br />
at moderate (~37°C) temperatures (Waters, et. al., 1996). The<br />
gene for a nuclear-encoded HSP, Hsa32, encoding a 32 kDa<br />
protein, has been cloned in tomato (Liu, et. al., 2006).<br />
The mechanism by which HSPs contribute to heat<br />
tolerance is still enigmatic though several roles have been<br />
ascribed to them. Many studies assert that HSPs are molecular<br />
chaperones insuring the native configuration and functionality<br />
of cell proteins under heat stress. There is considerable<br />
evidence that acquisition of thermotolerance is directly related<br />
to the synthesis and accumulation of HSPs (Bowen, et. al.,<br />
2002). For instance, HSPs provide for new or distorted proteins<br />
to fold into shapes essential for their normal functions. They<br />
also help shuttling proteins from one compartment to another<br />
and transporting old proteins to “garbage disposals” inside<br />
the cell. Among others, HSP70 has been extensively studied<br />
and is proposed to have a variety of functions such as protein<br />
translation and translocation, proteolysis, protein folding or<br />
chaperoning, suppressing aggregation, and reactivating<br />
denatured proteins (Zhang, et. al., 2005). Recently, dual role<br />
of LMW HSP21 in tomato has been described as protecting<br />
PSII from oxidative damage and involvement in fruit color<br />
change during storage at low temperatures (Neta-Sharir, et.<br />
al., 2005).<br />
In many plant species, thermotolerance of cells and<br />
tissues after a heat stress is pretty much dependent upon<br />
induction of HSP70, though HSP101 has also been shown to<br />
be essential (Schoffl, et. al., 1999). One hypothesis is that<br />
HSP70 participates in ATP-dependent protein unfolding or<br />
assembly/disassembly reactions and it prevents protein<br />
denaturation during heat stress (Iba, 2002). Evidence for the<br />
general protective roles of HSPs comes from the fact that<br />
mutants unable to synthesize them or the cells in which HSP70<br />
synthesis is blocked or inactivated are more susceptible to<br />
heat injury (Burke, 2001). Heat sensitivity was associated with<br />
reduced capacity of bentgrass variants to accumulate<br />
chloroplastic HSPs (Wang and Luthe, 2003). The level of<br />
HSP22, a member of the plant small HSP super-family, remained<br />
high under continuous heat stress (Lund, et. al., 1998). LMW-<br />
HSPs may play structural roles in maintaining cell membrane<br />
integrity. Localization of LMW-HSPs in chloroplast membranes<br />
further suggested that these proteins protect the PSII from<br />
adverse effects of heat stress and play a role in photosynthetic<br />
electron transport (Wahid, et. al., 2007).<br />
Other heat induced proteins<br />
Besides HSPs, there are a number of other plant proteins,<br />
including ubiquitin (Sun and Callis, 1997), cytosolic Cu/Zn-
KUMAR AND RAO, Physiological, Biochemical and Molecular Changes during High Temperature in Plants–A Review 11<br />
SOD (Herouart and Inze, 1994) and Mn-POD (Brown et. al.,<br />
1993), whose expressions are stimulated up during heat stress.<br />
For example, in Prosopis chilensis and soybean under heat<br />
stress, ubiquitin and conjugated-ubiquitin synthesis during<br />
the first 30min of exposure emerged as an important mechanism<br />
of heat tolerance (Ortiz and Cardemil, 2001). Some studies<br />
have shown that heat shock induces Mn-peroxidase, which<br />
plays a vital role in minimizing oxidative damages (Iba, 2002).<br />
In a study on Chenopodium murale, when leaf proteins extracts<br />
from thylakoid and stromal fractions were subjected to heat<br />
stress it was determined that Cu/Zn-SOD from stromal fraction<br />
was more heat tolerant than Cu/Zn-SOD from thylakoid, and<br />
this was responsible for chloroplastic stability under heat<br />
stress (Khanna-Chopra and Sabarinath, 2004). In another<br />
study, a number of osmotin like proteins induced by heat and<br />
nitrogen stresses, collectively called Pir proteins, were found<br />
to be overexpressed in the yeast cells under heat stress<br />
conferring them resistance to tobacco osmotin (an antifungal)<br />
(Yun, et. al., 1997). Late embryogenesis abundant (LEA)<br />
proteins can prevent aggregation and protect the citrate<br />
syntheses from desiccating conditions like heat- and droughtstress<br />
(Goyal, et. al., 2005). Using proteomics tool, Majoul, et.<br />
al., 2003 determined enhanced expressions of 25 LEA proteins<br />
in hexaploid wheat during grain filling. Geranium leaves<br />
exposed to drought and heat stress revealed expression of<br />
dehydrin proteins (25-60 kDa), which indicated a possible<br />
linkage between drought and heat-stress tolerance (Arora, et.<br />
al., 1998). Recently, three low-molecular-weight dehydrins<br />
have been identified in sugarcane leaves with increased<br />
expression in response to heat stress (Wahid and Close, 2007).<br />
Function of these proteins is apparently slated to protein<br />
degradation pathway, minimizing the adverse effects of<br />
dehydration and oxidative stress during heat stress (Schoffl,<br />
et. al., 1999).<br />
Conclusion and future prospects<br />
Plants exhibit a variety of responses to high<br />
temperatures, which are depicted by symptomatic and<br />
quantitative changes in growth and morphology. The ability<br />
of the plant to cope with or adjust to the heat stress varies<br />
across and within species as well as at different developmental<br />
stages. Although high temperatures affect plant growth at all<br />
developmental stages, later phenological stages, in particular<br />
anthesis and grain filling are generally more susceptible. Pollen<br />
viability, patterns of assimilates partitioning, and growth and<br />
development of seed/grain are highly adversely affected.<br />
Other notable heat stress effects include structural changes<br />
in tissues and cell organelles, disorganization of cell<br />
membranes, disturbance of leaf water relations, and impedance<br />
of photosynthesis via effects on photochemical and<br />
biochemical reactions and photosynthetic membranes.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
Author acknowledges University Grants Commission,<br />
India for the award of Junior Research Fellowship (Non- NET)<br />
for carrying out his M.Phil work at University of Delhi.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Anon S, Fernandez JA, Franco JA, Torrecillas A, Alarcon JJ and Sanchez<br />
MJ, 2004. Effects of water stress and night temperature<br />
preconditioning on water relations and morphological and<br />
anatomical changes of Lotus creticus plants. Sci. Hort. 101: 333-<br />
342.<br />
Antunes MDC and Sfakiotakis EM, 2000. Effects of high temperature<br />
stress on ethylene biosynthesis, respiration and ripening of<br />
‘Hayward” kiwifruit. Post Harvest Biol. Technol. 20: 251-259.<br />
Arora R, Pitchay DS and Bearce BC, 1998. Water stress induced heat<br />
tolerance in geranium leaf tissues a possible link through stress<br />
proteins. Physiologia Pl. 103: 24-30.<br />
Arshad M and Frankenberger WT, 1990. Production and stability of<br />
ethylene in soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 10: 29-34.<br />
Ashraf M and Foolad MR, 2007. Roles of glycine betaine and proline in<br />
improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ. exp. Bot. 59:<br />
206-216.<br />
Ashraf M, Saeed MM and Qureshi MJ, 1994. Tolerance to high<br />
temperature in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at initial growth<br />
stages. Environ. exp. Bot. 34: 275-283.<br />
Blum A, 1988. Plant Breeding for Stress Environments. CRC Press Inc,<br />
Boca Raton, Florida,<br />
Bowen J, Michael LY, Plummer KIM and Ferguson IAN, 2002. The<br />
heat shock response is involved in thermotolerance in suspension<br />
cultured apple fruit cells. J. Plant Physiol. 159: 599-606.<br />
Brown JA, Li D and lc M, 1993. Heat shock induction of manganese<br />
peroxidase gene transcription in Phanerochaete chryosporium.<br />
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59: 4295-4299.<br />
Camejo D, Rodriguez P, Morales MA, Dell’amico JM, Torrecillas A and<br />
Alarcon JJ, 2005. High temperature effects on photosynthetic<br />
activity of two tomato cultivars with different heat susceptibility.<br />
J. Plant Physiol. 162: 281-289.<br />
Chaitanya KV, Sundar D and Reddy AR, 2001. Mulberry leaf metabolism<br />
under high temperature stress. Biologia Pl. 44: 379-384.<br />
Chalker-Scott L, 2002. Do anthocyanins function as osmoregulators<br />
in leaf tissues? Adv. Bot. Res. 37, 103–106.<br />
Crafts-Brandner SJ and Salvucci ME, 2000. Rubisco activase constrains<br />
the photosynthetic potential of leaves at high temperature. Proc.<br />
Natl. Acad. Sci., USA. 97: 13430-13435.<br />
Dat JF, Breussegem VF, Vondenabele S, Vranova E, Montagu VM and<br />
Inze D, 2000. Dual action of active oxygen species during plant<br />
stress responses. Cell Mol. Life. Sci. 57: 779-795.<br />
Dat JF, Foyer CH and Scott IM, 1998. Changes in salicylic acid and<br />
antioxidants during induction of thermo tolerance in mustard<br />
seedlings. Plant Physiol. 118: 1455-1461.<br />
De Las Rivas J and Barber J, 1997. Structure and thermal stability of<br />
photosystem II reaction centers studied by infrared spectroscopy.<br />
Biochemistry 36: 8897-8903.<br />
De Ronde JAD, Cress WA, Kruger GHJ, Strasser RJ and Staden JV, 2004.<br />
Photosynthetic response of transgenic soybean plants containing<br />
as Arabidopsis P5CR gene, during heat and drought stress. J. Plant<br />
Physiol. 61: 1211-1244.<br />
Fadzillah NM, Gill V Finch RP and Burdon, RH, 1996. Chilling, oxidative<br />
stress and antioxidant responses in shoot cultures of rice. Planta
12 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
199: 552-556.<br />
Ferris R, Ellis RH, Wheeler TR and Hadley P, 1998. Effect of high<br />
temperature stress at anthesis on grain yield and biomass of field<br />
grown crops of wheat. Plant Cell Environ. 34: 67-78.<br />
Feussner K, Feussner I, Leopold I. and Wasternack C, 1997. Isolation<br />
of a cDNA coding for an ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBC1 of<br />
tomato the first stress-induced UBC of higher plants. FEBS Letts.<br />
409: 211-215.<br />
Foolad MR, 2005. Breeding for abiotic stress tolerances in tomato.:<br />
613-684. In Ashraf, M. & Harris, P.J.C. (eds) Abiotic Stresses:<br />
Plant Resistance Through Breeding and Molecular Approaches.<br />
The Haworth Press Inc., New York, USA.<br />
Goyal K, Walton LJ and Tunnacliffe A, 2005. LEA proteins prevent<br />
protein aggravation due to water stress. Biochem. J. 388: 151-157.<br />
Guilioni L, Wery J and Lecoeur J, 2003. High temperature and water<br />
deficit may reduce seed number in field pea purely by decreasing<br />
plant growth rate. Func. Plant Biol. 30: 1151-1164.<br />
Guilioni L, Wery J and Tardieu R, 1997. Heat stress-induced abortion<br />
of buds and flowers in pea: is sensitivity linked to organ age or to<br />
relations between reproductive organs? Ann. Bot. 80: 1 59-168.<br />
Hare PD, Cress WA and Staden JV, 1998. Dissecting the roles of<br />
osmolyte accumulation during stress. Plant Cell Environ. 21, 535–<br />
553.<br />
Hartung W, Sauter A and Hose E, 2002. Abscisic acid in the xylem:<br />
where does it come from, where does it go to? J. exp. Bot. 53: 27-<br />
32.<br />
Havaux M, 1998. Carotenoids as membrane stabilizers in chloroplasts.<br />
Trends Plant Sci. 3: 147-151.<br />
Hopf N, Plesofskv-Vig and Brambl R, 1992. The heat response of<br />
pollen and other tissues of maize. Plant Mol. Biol. 19: 623-630.<br />
Howarth C.J. 2005. Genetic improvements of tolerance to high<br />
temperature. In: Ashraf, M. and Harris PJC. Abiotic Stresses: Plant<br />
Resistance. Through Breeding and Molecular Approaches. Howarth<br />
Press Inc., New York, pp. 277-300.<br />
Iba, K. 2002. Acclimative response to temperature stress in higher<br />
plants: approaches of gene engineering for temperature tolerance.<br />
Ann. Rev. Plant Biol., 53: 225-245.<br />
Ismail, AM and Hall AE, 1999. Reproductive-stage heat tolerance, leaf<br />
membrane thermostability and plant morphology in cowpea. Crop<br />
Sci. 39: 1762-1768.<br />
Kamiya Y and Garcia Martinez JL, 1999. Regulation of gibberellin<br />
biosynthesis by light. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2: 398-403.<br />
Karim MA, Fracheboud Y and Stamp P, 1999. Photosynthetic activity<br />
of developing leaves of Zea mays is less affected by heat stress than<br />
that of developed leaves. Physiologia Plant. 105: 685-693.<br />
Karim, M.A, Fracheboud Y & Stamp, P. 1997. Heat tolerance of maize<br />
with reference of some physiological characteristics. Ann.<br />
Bangladesh Agri. 7: 27-33.<br />
Kavi Kishore PB, Sangam S, Amrutha RN, Laxmi PS, Naidu KR, Rao<br />
KRSS Rao S, Reddy KJ, Theriappan P and Sreenivasulu N, 2005.<br />
Regulation of proline biosynthesis, degradation, uptake and transport<br />
in higher plants: its implications in plant growth and abiotic stress<br />
tolerance. Curr. Sci. 88: 424-438.<br />
Khanna-Chopra R and Sabarinath S, 2004. Heat-stable chloroplastic<br />
Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase in Chenopodium murale. Biochem.<br />
Biophys. Res. Comm. 320: 1187-1192.<br />
Kinnersley AM and Turano FJ, 2000. Gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA)<br />
and plant responses to stress. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 19: 479-509.<br />
Larkindale J and Huang B, 2005. Effects of abscisic acid, salicylic acid,<br />
ethylene and hydrogen peroxide in thermotolerance and recovery<br />
for creeping bentgrass. Plant Growth Regul. 47: 17-28.<br />
Maestri E, Klueva N, Perrotta C, Gulli M, Nguyen HT and Marmiroli<br />
N. 2002. Molecular genetics of heat tolerance and heat shock<br />
proteins in cereals. Plant Mol. Biol. 48: 667-681.<br />
Marchand FL, Mertens S, Kockelbergh F, Beyens L and Nijs I, 2005.<br />
Performance of high arctic tundra plants improved during but<br />
deteriorated after exposure to a simulated extreme temperature<br />
event. Global Change Biol. 11: 2078-2089.<br />
Martineau JR, Specht JE, Williams JH and Sullivan CY, 1979.<br />
Temperature tolerance in soybean. I. Evaluation of technique for<br />
assessing cellular membrane thermostability. Crop Sci. 19: 75-78.<br />
Mazorra LM, Nunez M, Hechavarria E, Coll F and Sanchez-Blanco MJ,<br />
2002. Influence of brassinosteriods and antioxidant enzymes activity<br />
in tomato under different temperatures. Plant Biol. 45: 593-596.<br />
Mcdonald GK and Pausen GM, 1997. High temperature effects on<br />
photosynthesis and water relations of grain legumes. Plant Soil<br />
196: 47-58.<br />
Miller P, Lanier W and Brandt S, 2001. Using growing degree days to<br />
predict plant stages. Ag/Extension Communications Coordinator,<br />
Communications Services, Montana State University-Bozeman,<br />
USA.<br />
Momcilovic I and Ristic Z, 2007. Expression of chloroplast protein<br />
synthesis elongation factor, EF-Tu, in two lines of maize with<br />
contrasting tolerance to heat stress during early stages of plant<br />
development. J. Plant Physiol. 164: 90-99.<br />
Morales D, Rodriguez P, Dell’amico J, Nicolas E, Torrecillas A and<br />
Sanchez-Blanco MJ, 2003. High temperature preconditioning and<br />
thermal shock imposition affects water relations, gas exchange and<br />
root hydraulic conductivity in tomato. Biologia Pl. 47: 203-208.<br />
Mujer CV, Rumpho ML, Lin JJ and Kennedy RA, 1993. Constitutive<br />
and inducible aerobic and anaerobic stress proteins in the<br />
Echinochloa complex and rice. Plant Physiol. 101: 217-226.<br />
Neta-Sharir I, Isaacson T, Lurie S and Weiss D, 2005. Dual role for<br />
tomato heat shock protein 21: protecting photosystem from<br />
oxidative stress and promoting color changes during fruit maturation.<br />
Plant Cell 17: 1829-1838.<br />
Ortiz C and Cardemil L, 2001. Heat-shock responses in two leguminous<br />
plants: a comparative study. J. exp. Bot. 52: 1711-1719.<br />
Peet MM and Willits DH, 1998. The effect of night temperature on<br />
greenhouse grown tomato yields in warm climate. Agric. Forest<br />
Meteorol. 92: 191-202.<br />
Pierik RLM, 1996. Micropropagation: Technology and Opportunities.:<br />
9-22. In Prakash, J. & Pierik, R.L.M. (eds) Plant Biotechnology<br />
Commercial Prospects and Problems, Oxford IBH New Delhi, India.<br />
Quan R, Shang M, Zhang H, Zhao Y and Zhang J, 2004. Engineering of<br />
enhanced glycine betaine synthesis improves drought tolerance in<br />
maize. Plant Biotech. J. 2: 477-486.<br />
Rivero RM, Ruiz JM, Garcia PC, Lopez-Lefebre LR, Sanchez E and<br />
Romero L, 2001. Resistance to cold and heat stress: accumulation<br />
of phenolic compounds in tomato and watermelon plants. Plant<br />
Sci. 160: 315-321.<br />
Rojas A, Almoguera C and Jordano J, 1999. Transcriptional activation<br />
of a heat shock gene promoters in sunflower embryos: synergism<br />
between ABI3 and heat shock factors. Plant J. 20: 601-610.<br />
Sairam RK and Tyagi A, 2004. Physiology and molecular biology of
KUMAR AND RAO, Physiological, Biochemical and Molecular Changes during High Temperature in Plants–A Review 13<br />
salinity stress tolerance in plants. Curr. Sci. 86: 407-421.<br />
Sakamoto A and Murata N, 2002. The role of glycine betaine in the<br />
protection of plants from stress: clues from transgenic plants. Plant<br />
Cell Environ. 25: 163-171.<br />
Salvucci ME and Crafts-Brandner SJ, 2004. Relationship between the<br />
heat tolerance of photosynthesis and the thermal stability of Rubisco<br />
activase in plants from contrasting thermal environments. Plant<br />
Physiol. 134: 1460-1470.<br />
Sato S, Kamiyama M, Iwata T, Makita N, Furukawa H and Ikeda H,<br />
2006. Moderate increase of mean daily temperature adversely<br />
affects fruit set of Lycopersicon esculentum by disrupting specific<br />
physiological processes in male reproductive development. Ann.<br />
Bot. 97: 731-738.<br />
Savchenko GE, Klyuchareva EA, Abrabchik LM and Serdyuchenko EV,<br />
2002. Effect of periodic heat shock on the membrane system of<br />
etioplasts. Russian J. Pl. Physiol. 49: 349-359.<br />
Sayed, O.H. 1996. Adaptational responses of Zygophyllum qatarense<br />
Hadidi to stress conditions in a desert environment. J. Arid Environ.<br />
32: 445-452.<br />
Scandalios JG, 1993. Oxygen stress and superoxide dismutases. Pl.<br />
Physiol. 101: 7-12.<br />
Schoffl, F. Prandl, R. and Reindl, A. 1999. Molecular responses to heat<br />
stress.: In: Shinozaki, K. and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (eds)<br />
Molecular Responses to Cold, Drought, Heat and Salt Stress in<br />
Higher Plants. R.G. Landes Co. Austin, Texas. pp.81-98.<br />
Schopfer P, 2006. Biomechanics of plant growth. Am. J. Bot. 93:<br />
1415-1425.<br />
Sharkova VE, 2001. The effect of heat shock on the capacity of wheat<br />
plants to restore their photosynthetic electron transport after<br />
photoinhibition or repeated heating. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 48:<br />
793-797.<br />
Smertenko, A., Draber, P., Viklicky, V. and Opatrny, Z. 1997. Heat<br />
stress affects the organization of microtubules and cell division in<br />
Nicotiana tabacum cells. Plant Cell Environ., 20: 1534-1542.<br />
Somerville C, and Browse J, 1991. Plant lipids, metabolism and<br />
membranes. Science 252: 80-87.<br />
Stone P, 2001. The effects of heat stress on cereal yield and quality. :<br />
243-291. In Basra, A.S. (eds) Crop Responses and Adaptation to<br />
Temperature Stress. Food Products Press, Binghamton, NY.<br />
Swany PM and Smith BN, 1999. Role of abscisic acid in plant stress<br />
tolerance. Curr. Sci. 76: 1220-1227.<br />
Taiz L and Zeiger E, 2006. Plant Physiology. Sinauer Associates Inc.<br />
Publ., Massachusetts.<br />
Tan C, Yu ZW, Yang HD and Yu SW, 1988. Effect of high temperature<br />
on ethylene production in two plant tissues. Acta Phytophysiol.<br />
14: 373-379.<br />
Tian Q and Reed JW, 1999. Control of auxin-regulated root development<br />
by the Arabidopsis thaliana SHY2/IAA3 gene. Development 126:<br />
711-721.<br />
Todorov DT, Karanov EN, Smith AR and Hall MA, 2003.<br />
Chlorophyllase activity and chlorophyll content in wild type and<br />
eti 5 mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana subjected to low and high<br />
temperatures. Biologia Pl. 46: 633-636.<br />
Tomana T and Yamada H, 1988. Relationship between temperature<br />
and fruit quality of apple cultivars grown at different locations. J.<br />
Japanese Soc. Hort. Sci. 56: 391-397.<br />
Velikova V, Edreva A and Loreto E, 2005. Endogenous isoprene protects<br />
Phragmites australis leaves against singlet oxygen. Plant Cell<br />
Environ. 28: 318-327.<br />
Vierling E, 1991. The role of heat shock proteins in plants. Ann. Rev.<br />
Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 42: 579-620.<br />
Vu JCV, Gesch RW, Pennanen AH, Allen LHJ, Boote KJ and Bowes G,<br />
2001. Soybean photosynthesis, rubisco and carbohydrate enzymes<br />
function at supra-optimal temperatures in elevated CO 2<br />
. J. Plant<br />
Physiol. 158: 295-307.<br />
Wahid A and Close TJ, 2007. Expression of dehydrins under heat stress<br />
and their relationship with water relations of sugarcane leaves.<br />
Biologia Pl. 51: 104-109.<br />
Wahid A and Ghazanfar A, 2006. Possible involvement of some secondary<br />
metabolites in salt tolerance of sugarcane. J. Pl. Physiol. 163: 723-<br />
730.<br />
Wahid, A., Gelani, S., Ashraf, M. and Foolad, M.R. 2007. Heat tolerance<br />
in plants: An Overview. Environ. exp. Bot., 61: 199-223.<br />
Wang R, Guegler K, LaBrie ST and Crawford NM, 2000. Genomic<br />
analysis of a nutrient response in Arabidopsis reveals diverse<br />
expression patterns and novel metabolic and potential regulatory<br />
genes induced by nitrate. Plant Cell 12: 1491-1510.<br />
Waters I, ArmstrongW, Tommpson CJ, Setter TL, Atkins S, Gibbs J and<br />
Greenway H, 1989. Diurnal changes in radial oxygen loss and ethanol<br />
metabolism in roots of submerged and non-submerged rice seedlings.<br />
New Phytol. 113: 439-451.<br />
Wise R R, Olson AJ, Schrader SM and Sharkey TD, 2004. Electron<br />
transport is the functional limitation of photosynthesis in fieldgrown<br />
Pima cotton plants at high temperature. Plant Cell Environ.<br />
27: 717-724.<br />
Xiong L, Lee H, Ishitani M and Zhu JK, 2002. Regulation of osmotic<br />
stress responsive gene expression by LOS6/ABA1 locus in<br />
Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 8588-8596.<br />
Yang T, Sears RG, Gill BS and Paulsen GM, 2002. Genotypic differences<br />
in utilization of assimilate source during maturation of wheat under<br />
chronic heat and heat shock stresses. Euphytica 125: 179-188.<br />
Yun DJ, Zhao Y, Pardo JM, Narasimhan MX, Damsz B, Lee H, Abad<br />
LR, D’urzo MP, Hasegawa PM and Bressan RA, 1997. Stress proteins<br />
on the yeast cell surface determine resistance to osmotin, a plant<br />
antifungal protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 94: 7082- 7087.<br />
Zhang JH, Huang WD, Liu YP and Pan QH, 2005. Effects of temperature<br />
acclimation pretreatment on the ultrastructure of mesophyll cells<br />
in young grape plants (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Jingxiu) under crosstemperature<br />
stresses. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 47: 959-970.<br />
Zhang SQ and Outlaw WH, 2001. Gradual long-term water stress results<br />
in abscisic acid accumulation in the guard-cell symplast and guardcell<br />
apoplast of intact Vicia faba L. plants. J. Plant Growth Regul.<br />
20: 300-307.<br />
Recieved on 20-09-2012 Accepted on ..................
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 14-18, <strong>2013</strong><br />
M<strong>IN</strong>I REVIEW<br />
Knowledge and Gaps for Herbal Zinc in Relation to Their Role in Regulation of<br />
Male Fertility : A Review<br />
MANISH MATHUR<br />
18E-564, C.H.B., Jodhpur, Rajasthan, 342 003<br />
email: ravi_mm2099@yahoo.com<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Zinc is currently the trace minerals of greatest concern when<br />
considering the nutritional value of vegetarian. It plays several<br />
important roles in a biological system and considered as the<br />
closest thing to a nutritional aphrodisiac. In the present review<br />
various aspects related with zinc and male fertility were<br />
discussed. Zinc plays a key role in spermatogenesis from several<br />
perspectives and located primarily in the Lyding cells. It takes<br />
part in formation of sperm motility, influences directly on sperm<br />
morphology and plays an important part in capacitation. Various<br />
biological factors, heavy or regular use of alcohol, smoking<br />
and endocrine abnormalities are the major factors associated<br />
with de crea se level of seminal plas ma zinc leve l. Its<br />
bioavailability is highly influenced by phytate content of food<br />
material that makes non-vegetarian diet more preferable then<br />
vegetarian diet. Many medicinal plants as well as their products<br />
are now being use and marketed for correcting the Zinc<br />
deficiency. In present review it was realized that synergistic<br />
studies involving Zinc and phytate concentration and their<br />
impacts on sperm dynamics need to taken up.<br />
Dr. Manish Mathur has done M.Sc. in<br />
Botany and Ph.D. in Plant Ecology from<br />
Jai Narain Vyas University, Jo dhpur,<br />
Rajasthan. He has also done M.Sc. in<br />
Ecology and Environment from Indian<br />
Institute of Ecology and Environment, New<br />
Delhi. He d id his d octo ral work on<br />
validation of some aphrodisiac plant. He<br />
has 21 papers to his credit and got trained<br />
in Remote Sensing, Intellectual property<br />
rights, Agricultural statistics and Nanotechnology.<br />
globally the incidence of male fertility is about 13-18% (Mathur,<br />
2012). There has been a rapid increase in reports of declining<br />
sperm counts and infertility. Such rapid increase cannot be<br />
attributed to genetic factor alone. Environmental exposure to<br />
chemical, physical agents such as heat, lifestyle factors such<br />
as smoking and chewing tobacco, nutritional status and air<br />
Key words<br />
Zinc, Male infertility, Phytate, Medicinal Plants, Zn<br />
bioavailability<br />
Zinc is ubiquitously present throughout all biologic<br />
systems and has abundant and varied functions. It is the<br />
second most abundant trace element in the human body,<br />
totaling nearly 2 g. (Grahn, et al.,2001). Found in more than<br />
300 enzymes and a cofactor for multiple biologic processes<br />
including DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis. Zn plays a key<br />
role in spermatogenesis from several perspectives (Croxford,<br />
et al.,2010). Located primarily in the Lyding cells, the late type<br />
B spermatogonia, and the spermatids and essential for the<br />
production and secretion of testosterone with follicale<br />
stimulating hormone of spermatogenesis (Ruwanpura, et al.,<br />
2010). As a result, Zn deficiency has been associated with<br />
reduced function of the luteinizing hormone receptor (Song,<br />
et al., 2010), reduce steroid synthesis (Prasad, 1985)), and<br />
Leyding cell damage (Hesketh, 1982) emanating from oxidative<br />
stress (Oteiza, et al., 1996). Zn is quite high in the developing<br />
spermatocytes due to the need for Zn during DNA<br />
condensation and Meosis (Kundu and Rao, 1996).<br />
Zinc and Male Fertility<br />
It has been reported that male pattern contributes in<br />
40% of the cases of infertility (Wroblewska, et al., 2011), and<br />
Fig. 1. (Adopted from Sorensen, et al., 1999). Electron<br />
micrograph of human sperm cells autometallographically<br />
developed for zinc ions (A) Zinc grain are associated to the<br />
acrosome (ac). The segmented column (s), the mitochondria<br />
(m) and outer dense fibers (odf). (B) Cross-section of sperm<br />
tail Zinc grains are found at the outer dense fibers (odf) and<br />
the plasma membrane (pm).
MATHUR, Knowledge and Gaps for Herbal Zinc in Relation to their Role in Regulation of Male Fertility 15<br />
pollutants have also been reported to affect sperm quality<br />
(Doshi, et al.,2008). Zinc is often described as the closest<br />
thing to a nutritional aphrodisiac. The highest concentration<br />
of zinc in the male body is in the prostrate and the prostate<br />
fluid, ranges from 78.9 to 274.6 mg/L. (Dissanayake, et al.,2010).<br />
Its believed that zinc not only stimulate the prostrate<br />
testosterone and increase sperm count, but also stimulate the<br />
prostate glands. Zinc levels have been reported to influences<br />
sperm count (Chia, et al.,2000), antioxidant status (Gavella,<br />
and Lipovac, 1998) and seminal viscosity (Elzanaty, et al.,<br />
2004). It was noticed that seminal fluid with higher percentage<br />
of motile spermatozoa contains plasma with higher Zn<br />
concentration (Wong, et al., 2001).<br />
Male fertility is influenced by zinc in several different<br />
ways, it takes part in formation of sperm motility (Kumar, et<br />
al., 2006), influences directly on sperm morphology (Massanyi,<br />
et al.,2004). Seminal plasma zinc concentration has been<br />
significantly correlated with sperm density, possibly<br />
contributing a positive effect on spermatogenesis (Chia, et<br />
al., 2000; Fuse, et al.,1999).<br />
In addition to the beneficial effects of zinc on fertility,<br />
the relationship of zinc in prostate health must also be<br />
mentioned. A correlation exists between low prostate (tissue<br />
and fluid) zinc levels and prostatic carcinoma. The<br />
concentration of zinc in the prostate is higher than that in any<br />
other tissue in the body. Prostatic zinc content decreases<br />
incrementally from normal prostate to benign prostatic<br />
hyperplasia (BPH) to cancer. It was shown that the semen pH<br />
increase was caused by the decrease of Zn concentration in<br />
seminal fluid.<br />
Factors Affecting Zinc Levels in Male<br />
Solomons, 1986 described that host factors and dietary<br />
factors determine the absorption of zinc by an individual. The<br />
bio-availability of zinc in most common foods typically is in<br />
the range of 10-30%. Some non-digestible plant constituents<br />
such as phytates, dietary fibres and lignin can bind zinc in<br />
ways that inhibit its absorption thereby engendering dietary<br />
zinc deficiency.<br />
Pathozoospermia (Dissanayake, et al., 2010),<br />
inflammatory conditions (Kruse, et al., 2002), accumulation of<br />
toxic heavy metals in the testicular tissues (Akinloye, and<br />
Arowojolu, 2006), chronic prostatitis (Wong, et al., 2001), low<br />
Zn/Cd ration (Kruse, et al.,2002), mumps-related orchitis,<br />
diabetes mellitus, small testicles (
16 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
Table 2. Zinc contents in different medicinal plants (sources Ansari, et al., 2004; Alwakeel, 2008; Khant, et al., 2008;<br />
Lokhande, et al., 2010; Annan, et al., 2010 and Stef, et al., 2010)<br />
S. No Plant Name Zn (µ/g) S. No Plant Name Zn (µ/g)<br />
1 Aichornea cordifolia 46.5 41 Hemidesmus indicus 29.4<br />
2 Acorus calamus 39.2 42 Hypercium perforatum 16.9<br />
3 Aloe barbedensis 1.1 43 Jatropha gossypifolia 56<br />
4 Aloe vera 12.6 44 Lawsonia inermie 30.7<br />
5 Amomum subulatum 45.3 45 Lepidium sativum 77<br />
6 Anethum graveloens 7.3 46 Lippia multiflora 45<br />
7 Artemisia absinthium 12 47 Mentha arvensis 40.3<br />
8 Artemisia herba alboa 45.1 48 Mentha piperita 11.2<br />
9 Artemisia vulgaris 38.14 49 Mimosa pudica 49.8<br />
10 Artiemisia annua 43.4 50 Mucuna pruriens 32<br />
11 Asparagus adscendens 32.87 51 Myristica fragrans 28<br />
12 Astralagus sarcocolla 2.9 52 Nerium oleander 42.2<br />
13 Azadirachta indica 33.3 53 Nigella sativa 52.3<br />
14 Boerhavia diffusa 43.5 54 Occimum basilicum 101.5<br />
15 Bryophyllum pinnatum 47.5 55 Occimum gratissimum 100.5<br />
16 Caffea arabica 8.1 56 Occimum sanctum 122.5<br />
17 Calendula officinalis 14.8 57 Peganum harmala 20.5<br />
18 Calligonum comosum 12.4 58 Pergularia daemia 63.5<br />
19 Capcicum frutenscens 22.8 59 Phyllanthus amarus 80.5<br />
20 Capsella bursa pastoris 11.4 60 Poligonum aviculare 18.3<br />
21 Cassia fistula 66.3 61 Ranunculus mariculatus 28.6<br />
22 Cassia siamea 47 62 Rauwolfia serpentine 32.6<br />
23 Chenopodium foliosum 50 63 Rauwoliflia vomitoria 47.5<br />
24 Chlorophytum borivilianum 13 64 Salvia officinalis 96.2<br />
25 Cichorium intybus 89.64 65 Sizygium aromaticum 13.6<br />
26 Cinnamomum zeylanicum 18.7 66 Stevia rebaudiana 47.18<br />
27 Commiphora myrrah 2.9 67 Syzigium cumin 1.1<br />
28 Coriandrum sativum 51.6 68 Tecoma stans 43.2<br />
29 Cuminum cyminum 43 69 Turraea heterophylla 66.5<br />
30 Curcuma longa 18.3 70 Urtica dioica 28.8<br />
31 Cyamopsis tetragonoloba 17.34 71 Vernona ampygdaliana 58.5<br />
32 Desmodium adscendens 90 72 Vetveria zinzanoides 21.2<br />
33 Elettaria cordamomum 50.6 73 Vinca roseus 98.5<br />
34 Equisetum arvense 10.7 74 Voacanga africana 70.5<br />
35 Eucalyptus citriodora 32.3 75 Wathania coagulans 23.1<br />
36 Euphorbia heliscopia 45 76 Withania somnifera 43.01<br />
37 Foeniculum vulgare 37.5 77 Withania sonifera 39.5<br />
38 Glycyrrhiza glabra 12.7 78 Zanthoxylum xanthoxyloides 48.5<br />
39 Gymnea sylvestris 65.5 79 Zizgiber officinale 19.7<br />
40 Heliotropium indicum 76.5 80 Ziziphus vulgaris 7.5<br />
from low intake of bioavailable Zn. Zinc deficiency is one of<br />
the five leading risk factors contribute to the burden of disease<br />
in developing countries (WHO, 2002). Zn intake in North<br />
Africa, the Eastern Mediterranean United States, and Canada<br />
at ~ 10% and in Southeast Asia, the prevalence of Zn<br />
deficiency is ~33% (Croxford, et al., 2010). The International<br />
Zinc Nutrition Consultative Group estimates that 26% of the<br />
Indian population is at risk of inadequate zinc intake (Hotz,<br />
and Brown, 2004).<br />
Zinc is released from food as free ions during digestion.<br />
These liberated ions may then bind to endogenously secreted<br />
ligands or to exogenous material in the intestinal lumen before<br />
their transcellular uptake in the distal duodenum and proximal<br />
junction (Cousins, et al., 1996). Zinc transport into the<br />
enterocyte demonstrates saturable kinetics, suggesting<br />
involvement of a specific carrier mechanism. With high intakes,<br />
zinc is also absorbed through a passive, paracellular route.<br />
Unlike nutrients such as vitamin A and calcium, which<br />
are concentrated in a relatively small number of foods or<br />
specific food groups, zinc occurs in a wide range of plant<br />
based food items as well as animal sources of food (Table 1).<br />
However, the bioavailability of zinc from vegetarian diets is<br />
comparatively less than that of non-vegetarian diet. Plant food<br />
rich in zinc such as legumes, whole grain, nuts, and seeds are<br />
also high in phytic acid, an inhibitor of zinc bioavailability<br />
(Hunt, 2003). Despite high phytate content that lower the<br />
fraction of zinc absorbed from unrefined food, the higher<br />
content of these food may make these foods preferable to<br />
more refined products lower in zinc. For example, nearly 50%<br />
more zinc was absorbed from a serving of whole-wheat bread<br />
compared with a serving of the white bread (0.22 compared<br />
with 0.15 mg, respectively) because the zinc content of the
Table 3.<br />
MATHUR, Knowledge and Gaps for Herbal Zinc in Relation to their Role in Regulation of Male Fertility 17<br />
Herbal preparation containing Zinc<br />
Product Name Company name and address Composition<br />
Prostate First XENA BIO HERBALS PVT LTD, 3-6-294,<br />
HYDERGUDA, Hyderabad - 500029, Andhra<br />
Pradesh, India<br />
Saw Palmetto: 160mg,Soy Isoflavanes: 40%- 60mg, Stinging Nettle:<br />
125mg,Pumpkin Seed Extract: 175mg , Pygeum: 100mg, Zinc: 15mg,Copper:<br />
1mg, Lycopene: 10mg<br />
Ultra zinc 50<br />
New Roots Herbal Inc. 3405 FX Tessier<br />
Vaudreuil-Dorion, Quebec, Canada<br />
Zinc (from zinc citrate)50mg, Taurine350, Vitamin B1 (thiamine HCl), 6mg,<br />
Vitamin B2 (riboflavin and riboflavin 5'-phosphate), 15mg, Vitamin B6<br />
(pyridoxal HCl and pyridoxal 5-phosphate), 67mg, Molybdenum (from<br />
molybdenum citrate), 200mcg, Butternut squash (Cucurbita pepo var.<br />
moschata, seed extract 4:1), 15mg, Green Tea extract (Camellia sinensis), 50%<br />
total polyphenols 75mg<br />
BETAMEP Alna Biotech pvt ltd, SCF-320, 2nd Floor, M. Betacaotene 30% 10mg, zinc sulphate monohydrate 27. 50 mg, selenium<br />
Market, Manimajra, Chandigarh, Chandigarh - dioxide 75mcg, manganese sulphate 2mg, copper sulphate 1mg.<br />
134 109, India<br />
MOXAFAV Alna Biotech pvt ltd, SCF-320, 2nd Floor, M. Soya isoflavones 40% 40mg, alfacalcidol 0. 25mcg, calcium citrate 500mg,<br />
Market, Manimajra, Chandigarh, Chandigarh - magnesium oxide 40mg, copper sulphate 2mg, zinc oxide 40mg.<br />
134 109, India<br />
RESMEP Alna Biotech pvt ltd, SCF-320, 2nd Floor, M. Resveratrol 30% 5mg, grape seed extract 50mg, omega-3 fatty acids 150mg,<br />
Market, Manimajra, Chandigarh, Chandigarh - zinc 20mg, chromium 200mcg, selenium 200mcg.<br />
134 109, India<br />
R-Gin Granules Westcoast pharmaceuticals works L-Arginione, Zinc & Folic Acid Granules<br />
Solvazinc ® Effervescent<br />
Tablets<br />
Galen limited Seagoe Industrial Estate,<br />
Craigavon, Co Armagh, Northern Ireland, BT63<br />
5UA, Ireland<br />
Zinc sulphate monohydrate , Sorbitol (E420), mannitol (E421), sodium<br />
hydrogen carbonate, citric acid, saccharin sodium, povidone K25, sodium<br />
citrate and sodium carbonate anhydrous<br />
Zinc (in form of mg zinc citrate trihydrate) 10 mg, Aspartame 15mg,<br />
Sorbitol 655 mg, sodium 8.4 mmol<br />
Redoxon Double Action Bayer limited, The Atrium, Blackthorn Road,<br />
Dublin 18<br />
R-Gin Granules Westcoast pharmaceuticals works L-Arginione, Zinc & Folic Acid Granules<br />
whole- wheat bread more than compensated for less efficient<br />
absorption of zinc (16.6% compared with 38.2% respectively).<br />
Further with respect of male infertility it is evident that zinc –<br />
rich plants will enhance fertility in males (Honig, et al.,1994;<br />
Glenville, 2008 and Ogunlesi, 2009). There are numerous<br />
attempts have been made to quantify the zinc contents in<br />
medicinal plants (Table 2), however the bioavailability of zinc<br />
content from these medicinal plants and their phytic acid<br />
concentration are synergistically not available. Thus<br />
comparative analysis of zinc, phytic acid content, their ration<br />
as well as correlation between these plant derived zinc with<br />
seminal zinc are required. From present review it was emerged<br />
that various Occimum species like sanctum (122.5 µ/g),<br />
basilicum (101.5 µ/g) and gratissimum (100.5 µ/g) contains<br />
highest zinc concentration among 80 different plant species,<br />
it indicates its synergism with seminal zinc. However, Sethi, et<br />
al., 2010 reported (Occimum sanctum) as a male contraceptive<br />
that reduces the sperm counts in treated albino rabbits that<br />
indicates that lower bioavailability of Zn from this plant that<br />
ultimately not supportive for sperm count. In fruit of Tribulus<br />
terrestris they have (Mathur, and Sundaramoorthy, <strong>2013</strong>)<br />
reported that zinc concentration ranges from 2.0-2.4µ/g and<br />
their biological assay indicates the increase in weight (mg/<br />
100g body wt) of seminal vesicle (462.63 to 731.57) and ventral<br />
prostrate (109.09 to 126.37) with 80% sperm motility as<br />
compared with control animal. Thus generalized relationships<br />
between the zinc concentration in herbal plants and its role in<br />
sperm dynamics still required.<br />
Zinc an important trace element for various features of<br />
sperm dynamics. Its roles in spermatogenesis are well defined<br />
and it treated as an essential element for male reproductive<br />
function. However zinc from vegetarian diets are generally<br />
less bioavailable than from non-vegetarian diets because of<br />
reduced meat intake as well as the tendency to consume more<br />
phytic acid and other plant-based inhibitors of zinc absorption.<br />
Various biological, environmental and life style factors<br />
affecting the zinc concentration in male that ultimately played<br />
an inductive role for male infertility. Complementary and<br />
alternative medicines have provide a positive hope for the<br />
treatment of various zinc associated male disorders,<br />
consequently produces many herbal and ayuervedic products.<br />
However there is a gap between the concentration of plant Zn<br />
and their efficacy for parameters associated with sperm<br />
dynamics.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Akinloye, O. and Arowojolu, A.O. 2006. Cadmium toxicity; A possible<br />
cause of male infertility in Nigeria. Reproduction Biology, 6: 17-<br />
30.<br />
Alwakeel, S.S. 2008. Microbial and Heavy metals contamination of<br />
herbal medicines. Research Journal of Microbiology. 3(12): 683-<br />
691.<br />
Annan, K., Kojo, A.I., Cindy, A., Samuel, A.N. and Tunkumgnen, B.M.<br />
2010. Profiled of heavy metals in some medicinal plants from<br />
Ghana commonly used as components of herbal formulation.<br />
Pharmacognosy Research, 2(1), 41-44.<br />
Ansari, T.M., Ikram, N., Haq, N.M., Fayyaz, Q., Fazyyaz, I, Ghafoor,<br />
I and Khalid, N. 2004. Essential trace metal (zinc, manganese,<br />
copper and iron) level in plants of medicinal importance. Journal<br />
of Biological Sciences, 4(2): 95-99.<br />
Chia, S.E., Ong, C.N. and Chua, L.H. 2000. Comparison of zinc<br />
concentrations in blood and seminal plasma and the various sperm<br />
parameters between fertile and infertile men. Journal of Androlology,<br />
21:53–57.<br />
Colagar, A.H., Marzony, E.T. and Chaichi, M.J. 2009. Zinc levels in<br />
seminal plasma are associated with sperm quality in fertile and<br />
infertile men. Nutrition Research, 29:82–88.
18 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
Cousins, R.J., Ziegler, E.E. and Filer, L. J. 1996. Present Knowledge in<br />
Nutrition, 7th ed. Washington, DC: ILSI Press.<br />
Croxford, T.P., McCromick, N.H. and Kelleher, S.L. 2010. Moderate<br />
zinc deficiency reduces testicular Zip6 and Zip 10 abundance and<br />
impairs spermatogenesis in mice. The Journal of Nutrition,<br />
Biochemical, Molecular, and Genetic Mechanisms. 359-365.<br />
Dissanayake, D.M.A.B., Wijesinghe, P.S., Ratnasooriya, W.D. and<br />
Wimalasena, S. 2010. Relationship between seminal plasm zinc<br />
and semen quality in a subfertile population. Journal of Human<br />
Reproductive Sciences, 3(3): 124-128.<br />
Doshi, H., Oza, H., Tekani, H., Mankad, M. and Kumar. S. 2008. Zinc<br />
levels in seminal plasma and its relationship with seminal<br />
characteristics. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gyecology of India,<br />
58(2): 152-155.<br />
Elzanaty, S., Malm, J. and Giwercman, A. 2004. Visco-elasticity of<br />
seminal fluid in relation to the epididymal and accessory sex gland<br />
function and its impact on sperm motility. International Journal<br />
of Andrology, 27: 94-100.<br />
Fuse, H., Kazama, T., Ohta, S. and Fujiuchi Y. 1999. Relationship<br />
between zinc concentrations in seminal plasma and various sperm<br />
parameters. International Journal of Urology and Nephrology,<br />
31:401–408.<br />
Gavella, M. and Lipovac, V. 1998. In vitro effect of zinc on oxidative<br />
changes in human semen. Andrologia, 30: 317-323.<br />
Glenville, M. 2008. The nutritional approaches to male factor infertility.<br />
Fragons Tale, 18: 4-5.<br />
Grahn, B. H., Paterson, P. G., Gottschall-Pass, K. T. and Zhang, Z.<br />
2001 Zinc and the eye. Journal of American College of Nutrition,<br />
20:106–118.<br />
Gusani, P.H., Skandhan, K.P., Valsu, C. and Mehta, Y. B. 1988. Sodium<br />
and potassium in normal and pathological seminal plasma. Acta<br />
Europiean Fertility, 19: 333-336.<br />
Hesketh, J. E. 1982. Effects of dietary zinc deficiency on Leydig cell<br />
ultra structure in the boar. Journal of Comparative Pathology,<br />
92:239–47.<br />
Honing, S.C., Lipschultz, L.I. and Jarow, J.P. 1994. Significant medicinal<br />
pathology uncovered by a comprehensive male infertility<br />
evaluation, Fertility Sterility, 62(5): 1028-1034.<br />
Hotz, C. and Brown, KH. 2004. Assessment of the risk of zinc deficiency<br />
in population and option for its control. Food and Nutrition Bulletin,<br />
25: 91-201.<br />
Hunt, J. 2003. Bioavailability of iron, zinc and other trace minerals<br />
from vegetarian diets. American Society for Clinical Nutrition,<br />
pp.633-639<br />
Kellokumpu, S. and Rajaniemi H. 1981. Effect of zinc on the uptake of<br />
human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in rat testis and testosterone<br />
response in vivo. Biology Reproduction, 24:298–305.<br />
Kruse, W.E., Zwick, E.M., Batschulat, K., Rohr, G., Ambruster, F.P. and<br />
Petzoldt, D. 2002. Are zinc level in seminal plasma associated with<br />
seminal leucocytes and other determinants of semen quality? Fertility<br />
Sterility, 77: 260-269.<br />
Kumar, H., Verma, R.P., Singh, L.P., Varshney, V.P. and Dass, R.S.<br />
2006. Effect of different levels and sources of zinc supplementation<br />
on quantitative and qualitative semen attributes and serum<br />
testosterone level in crossbred cattle (Bos indicus x Bos Taurus)<br />
bulls. Reproduction Nutrition and Development, 46: 663-675.<br />
Kundu, T.K. and Rao, M.R.S. 1996. Zinc dependent recognition of a<br />
human CpG island sequence by the mammalian spermatidal protein<br />
TP2. Biochemistry, 35: 15626-16532.<br />
Lokhande, R., Singare, P. and Andhale, M. 2010. Study on mineral<br />
content of some ayurvedic Indian medicinal plants by instrumental<br />
neutron activation analysis and AAS techniques. Health Science<br />
Journal, 4(3): 157-168.<br />
Mathur, M. and Sundaramoorthy, S. <strong>2013</strong>. Ethnopharmacological studies<br />
of Tribulus terrestris (Linn) in relation to its aphrodisiac properties.<br />
African Journal of Traditional Complementary and Alternative<br />
Medicine, 10(1): 83-94.<br />
Mathur, M. and Sundaramoorthy, S. 2006. Ecological and aphrodisiac<br />
properties of Blepharis sindica. Nigerian Journal of Natural Product<br />
and Medicine., 10: 17-25.<br />
Massanyi, P., Trandzik, J., Nad, P., Korenkova, B., Skalisk, M., Toman,<br />
R., Kukac, N., Halo and M., Strazak, P. 2004. Concentration of<br />
copper, iron, zinc, cadmium, lead and nickel in bull and ram semen<br />
and relation to the occurrence of pathological spermatozoa. Journal<br />
of Environmental Science and Health A, 39(11-12): 3005-3014.<br />
Ogunlesi, M., Okiei, W., Ofor, E. and Awonuga, O. 2009. Determination<br />
of concentration of zinc and vitamin C in Oysters and some<br />
medicinal plants used to correct male factor infertility. Journal of<br />
Natural Products, 2: 89-97.<br />
Oteiza P.L., Olin, K.L., Fraga, C.G. and Keen, C.L. 1996. Oxidant<br />
defence systems in testes from zinc-deficient rants. Proceeding of<br />
Society of Experimental Biology Medicine, 213: 85-91.<br />
Pande, A.K. and Rout, S. 2006. Zinc in ayurvedic herbo-mineral products.<br />
Natural Product Radiance, 5(4): 284-288.<br />
Prasad, A.S. 1985. Clinical and biochemical manifestation zinc deficiency<br />
in human subjects. Journal of Pharmacology. 16:344–52.<br />
Prasad, A.S., Schulert, A. R., Miale, A.J., Farid, Z. and Sandstead, H.H.<br />
1963. Zinc and iron deficiencies in male subjects with dwarfism and<br />
hypergonadism but without ancyclostomiasis, schistrosomiasis or<br />
server anaemia. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 12: 437-<br />
444.<br />
Rossato, M., Virgilio, F.D., Rizzuto, R. Galeazzi, C. and Foresta, C.<br />
2001. Intracellular calcium store depletion and acrosome reaction<br />
in human spermatozoa role of calcium and plasm membrane<br />
potential. Molecular Human Reproduction, 7: 119-128.<br />
Ruwanpura, S., M., McLachlan, R.I. and Meachem, S.J. 2010. Hormonal<br />
regulation of male germ cell development. Journal of Endocrinology,<br />
205: 117-131.<br />
Salma, U., Gill, H.K., Keith, L.G., Tilmon, S., Jones, C.A., Sobti, A. and<br />
Patel, A. 2011. Male subferility and the role of micronutrient<br />
supplementation: clinical and economic issues. Journal of<br />
Experimental and Clinical Assisted Reproduction, 8: 29-37.<br />
Sethi, J., Yadav, M., Sood, S., Dahiya, K and Singh, V. 2010. Effect of<br />
tulsi (Occimum sanctum Linn.) on sperm count and reproductive<br />
hormones in male albino rabbits. International Jounral of Ayurvedic<br />
Research, 1(4): 208-210.<br />
Solomons, N.W. 1986. Factors affecting the bioavailability of zinc.<br />
Journal of American Diet Association, 5: 48-54.<br />
Song, Y., Elias, V., Loban, A., Scrimgeour, A.G. and Ho, E. 2010.<br />
Marginal zinc deficiency increases oxidative DNA damage in the<br />
prostate after chronic exercise. Free Radical Biology and Medicine.<br />
48: 82-88.<br />
Sorensen, M.B., Bergdahi, I.A., Hjollund, N.H. I., Bonde, J.P.E.,<br />
Stoltenberg, M. and Ernst, E. 1999. Zinc, magnesium and calcium<br />
in human seminal fluid: relations to other semen parameters and<br />
fertility. Molecular Human Reproduction, 5(4): 331-337.<br />
Stef, D.S., Gergen,I., Trasca, T.I., Harmaneseu, M., Stef, L., Druga, M.,<br />
Biron,R. and Mindru, G.H. 2010. Screening of 33 medicinal plants<br />
for the microelement content. Animal Science and Biotechnology,<br />
43(1): 1-6.<br />
World Health Organization (WHO) 2002. The World Health Report<br />
2002. Geneval: WHO.<br />
Wong, W.Y., Flik, G., Groenen, P.M., Swinkels, D.W., Thomas, C.W.<br />
and Copiuspeerboom, J.H. 2001. The impact of calcium, magnesium,<br />
zinc and copper in blood and seminal plasm on semen parameters<br />
in men. Reproduction Toxicology. 15: 131-136.<br />
Wroblewska, U.M., Kaminski, P., Lakota, P., Szymanski, M., Wasilow,<br />
K., Ludwikowski, G., Prusinska, M.K., Sypniewska, G.O., Stuczynski,<br />
T. and Michalkiewicz, J. 2011. Zinc and iron concentration and<br />
SOD activity in human semen and seminal plasma. Biology Trace<br />
Element Research, 143: 167-177.<br />
Recieved on 21-11-2012 Accepted on 29-12-2012
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 19-22, <strong>2013</strong><br />
M<strong>IN</strong>I REVIEW<br />
Insectivorous Plants and Their Trapping Mechanism: A Review<br />
MURALI, S. 1 AND NARASA REDDY, G.<br />
Department of Agricultural Entomology, UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru 65<br />
e-mail: dr.mmrl@rediffmail.com 1<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Insectivorous and carnivorous plants are those plants that<br />
maintain their life by trapping and eating insects and other<br />
creatures and are known as ‘Hunter plants’. They are among<br />
the curiosities of nature, being specialized in their mode of<br />
acquiring nutrition. These plants are usually associated with<br />
nutrient poor soils and wetlands, where anaerobic condition<br />
exists and partial decomposition of organic matter occurs.<br />
Insectivorous plants are successful; because they supplement<br />
their photosynthetic food by trapping insect and digesting their<br />
nitrogen rich bodies. They have brilliant colours, nectarines<br />
glands, sweet secretions and other curious ways to lure their<br />
innocent victims. In India insectivorous plants are present in<br />
Kerala, Assam, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Nilgris in Tamil<br />
Nadu. The Pitcher plant, Nepenthes spp. are found in Khasie<br />
and Jaintia hills of Meghalaya. They have multipurpose uses.<br />
The sundew, Drosera indica is used in the preparation of goldbhasma<br />
and D. peltata is used for dying silk. Nepenthes along<br />
with the debris of trapped insects inside, mixed with water is<br />
capable of curing cholera. Utricularia aurea and U. reticulate<br />
are suitable for aquaria and rockeries. The insects attracted by<br />
insectivorous plants include mosquitoes, housefly, small<br />
butterflies and beetles. They digest the insects through the<br />
secretion of acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric and vaerianic<br />
acids. Insectivorous plants are very sensitive to pollutants. Some<br />
of the insectivorous plants have been extinct from the natural<br />
fauna and are included in red data book. Further field level<br />
studies and research are to be developed in this area to utilize<br />
these novel plants as a component of integrated pest<br />
management.<br />
Key words<br />
Insectivorous plants, Nepenthes spp., Drosera indica,<br />
D. peltata, Utricularia aurea, U. reticulate<br />
An insectivorous plant, also called as carnivorous plant,<br />
captures prey items, such as insects, spiders, crustaceans,<br />
mites and protozoan’s, as a nitrogen source. Many<br />
insectivorous species live in freshwater bogs, where nitrogen<br />
is not present in available form, because the pH of the water is<br />
extremely acid. About 670 species of insectivorous plants are<br />
found and representing nine angiospermous families such as<br />
Bromeliaceae (Brocchinia reducta), Byblidaceae (Bylis<br />
gigantean), Cephalotacea (Cephalotus follicularis),<br />
Dioncophyllaceae (Triphyophyllum peltatum), Droseraceae<br />
(About 110 species; Dionaea, Drosera, Drosophyllum),<br />
Lentibulariaceae (Genlisea, Pinguicula, Utricularia),<br />
Nepenthace (About 70 species; Nepenthes), Sarraceniaceae<br />
(Darligtonia, Heliamphora, Sarracenia). Way back in 1875<br />
Charles Darwin drew the attention of scientific community to<br />
the world of insects eating plants in one of his essays. The<br />
insectivorous plants often have several attractions such as<br />
brilliant colours, sweet secretions and other curious ways to<br />
lure their innocent victims. The mode of action, insect trapping<br />
mechanisms and other new aspects related to carnivorous<br />
plants are given in this topic. The potential of these plants for<br />
human welfare is also discussed below.<br />
Why do these plants hunt?<br />
Murali, S. presently pursuing Ph.D. degree<br />
in the Department o f Agricultural<br />
Entomology at UAS, GKVK, Bangalore.<br />
He was doing research on prospecting<br />
antimicro bial peptides from aculeate<br />
Hymenop tera: In vivo sc reening of<br />
antimicrobial peptides from bees and<br />
wasps. He was doing research on<br />
management of bringal shoot and fruit borer<br />
at NBAII, Bangalore.<br />
Narasa Reddy, G. Currently pursuing<br />
Ph.D. d egree in the dep artment of<br />
Agricultural Entomology at UAS, GKVK,<br />
Bangalore. He was engaged on Studies on<br />
the interrelationship b etween s oil<br />
mesofauna and nematodes in organic<br />
farming system.<br />
All plants need nitrogen and phosphorus to build<br />
proteins and nucleic acids in their cells. Most of plants get<br />
these elements from the soil, where they are released by<br />
bacteria and fungi during the break down of dead matter.<br />
However, in some habitats, the growth of these microorganisms<br />
is suppressed and the soil becomes impoverished. These<br />
conditions are found in blanket peat bogs, where the growth<br />
of the moss sphagnum produces organic acids, which kills<br />
many of the microbes that usually recycle nutrients in the<br />
soil. These plants are usually associated with rain-washed,<br />
nutrient poor soils or wet and acidic areas that are ill drained.<br />
Such wetlands are acidic due to anaerobic conditions, which<br />
cause partial decomposition of organic material into the<br />
surroundings. As a result, most microorganisms necessary
20 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
for complete decomposition of organic matter, cannot survive<br />
in such poorly oxygenated conditions. Normal plants find<br />
difficult to survive on such areas. The hunter plants are<br />
successful in such places because they supplement their<br />
photosynthetic food production by trapping insects and<br />
digesting their nitrogen rich bodies. However, carnivorous<br />
plants have evolved to steal the nitrates and phosphates of<br />
animals, which have become their prey.<br />
In carnivorous plants, the leaf is not just used for<br />
photosynthesis; it is also used as a trap. The problem with<br />
this is that changing the leaf shape to make it a better trap<br />
makes it less efficient at photosynthesis. For example, pitchers<br />
have to be held upright, so that only their lids directly intercept<br />
light. Even worse, the plant has to spend extra energy on nonphotosynthetic<br />
structures like glands, hairs, glue and digestive<br />
enzymes. The energy source for these things is ATP, so the<br />
plant has to respire more of its biomass away to keep up with<br />
the demand for energy. Therefore, a carnivorous plant will<br />
have both decreased photosynthesis and increased<br />
respiration, making potential for its growth (Lloyd, 1992).<br />
Habitat of Carnivorous plants:<br />
Carnivorous plants live on every continent except<br />
Antarctica. In USA, they are prevalent in every state. In India<br />
they are found in Kerala, Assam, Tamil Nadu, Ooty and Nilgiris.<br />
Biggest Carnivorous plants<br />
It comes under the genus Nepenthes. Sarracenia<br />
purpurea, these large vines grow up to 10 meter long. Plants<br />
in this genus also have traps that have evolved to capture<br />
some of the largest prey including creatures such as frogs,<br />
Very rarely, captures of birds and rodents have been reported.<br />
Smallest Carnivorous plant<br />
It comes under the genus Drosera. Drosera ultima is<br />
the smallest insectivorous plant. It captures tiny insects.<br />
Uses of Insectivorous Plants<br />
They posses ethno-botanical and medicinal values.<br />
Drosera species are important economically. Due to the rich<br />
content of organic acids and enzymes, these plants are capable<br />
of curdling milk. In ethno-medicine the brushed leaf either or<br />
without common salt, are applied on blisters (Pinguicula,<br />
Drosera), Making rope (Nepenthes ampullaris, Indonesia),<br />
Container for steaming rice (Nepenthes sp., Philippines), A<br />
food sweetner (Byblis, Austrilia), Fly catchers (Drosophyllum,<br />
potugal), Kinky sex toy (Utricularia, USA, Ornamental use<br />
(Sarracenia leucophylla, San Francisco USA), Drosera<br />
indica is reported to be used by ayurvedic practitioners in<br />
the preparation of gold-bhasma considered an anti-syphilitic<br />
and tonic, Yellowish brown crystalline pigment from Drosera<br />
peltata is used for dyeing silk. Nepenthes, the pitchers along<br />
with the debris of trapped insects inside are rubbed into paste,<br />
mixed with water and given to cholera patients. The liquid<br />
inside the pitcher is consumed as a remedy for urinary troubles.<br />
It is also used as eye drops for treating redness and itching of<br />
eyes. Utricularia aurea and U. reticulate are ornamental<br />
especially suitable for aquaria and rockeries. U. sterllaris is<br />
useful against cough (Somons, 1995).<br />
Pest control<br />
Carnivorous plants attract beetles, butterflies and some<br />
of the attract caterpillars which feed on vegetables.<br />
Insectivorous plants can be grown well in green houses. Those<br />
temperate vegetables grown under this condition, we can have<br />
these plants to trap caterpillars. Some carnivorous plants<br />
especially Drosera attract flies. This can be used as a vector<br />
control agent (to control house flies). In Venus flytrap many<br />
time mosquitoes were attracted. We can use it in future as<br />
mosquitoes trap. House with carnivorous plants leads to<br />
pollution free mosquitoes control bioagent. Largest<br />
carnivorous plants like Nepenthes species sometimes rodents<br />
were captured. If we developed it on the bunds with<br />
carnivorous plants acts as rodent trap. No need for rodenticide<br />
and training of birds etc. Anything we want to do, we can do<br />
through tissue culture. By multiplying these plants through<br />
tissue culture we can augment these wonder plants and we<br />
can create the condition that suits to our environment.<br />
Everything is possible. The ideas of persons and the way of<br />
utilizing technology are important. In future truly this is going<br />
to become a challenge to scientists.<br />
Insect Trapping Mechanism<br />
It includes four genera of which Drosera and<br />
Aldrovanda occurs in India. Here some of the insectivorous<br />
plants of India and their insect capacity mechanisms are given<br />
below.<br />
Table 1. Insectivorus plants<br />
S.N. Common Name Scientific Name Family<br />
1 Sundew plant Drosera rotundifolia Droseraceae<br />
2 Waterwheel plant Aldrovanda vesiculosa Droseraceae<br />
3 Venusfly trap Dionaea musipula Droseraceae<br />
4 Pitcher plant Nepenthes sp. Nepenthaceae<br />
5 Fly catcher Drosophyllum lusitanicum Droseraceae<br />
6 Bladder Utricularia sp. Lantibularaceae<br />
7 Butterwort Pinguicula Lantibularaceae<br />
Fig. 1. Pitcher Plant<br />
Fig. 2. Venus fly trap
MURALI AND REDDY, Insectivorous Plants and their Trapping Mechanism: A Review 21<br />
Pitcher Plants : Nepenthes sp. Nepenthaceae<br />
It conforms to the pitfall type of trap. Here the opening<br />
of pitcher, or pitfall, there is often a spot of bright colour,<br />
usually purple or white. Drops of nectar are secreted around<br />
the rim of pitcher and there is often a nectar baited pathway,<br />
from the ground to the mouth of the pitcher, that attract<br />
wingless insects and leads them to pitfall .Inside of pitcher is<br />
slippery. Ones the insect enter into the pitcher, it is unable to<br />
climb up because of slipperiness. Inner wall secrets photolytic<br />
enzyme. This helps to digest the body of trapped insects.<br />
Digestive enzymes are secreted by most of the species. But<br />
putrificative bacteria are often found in the liquid and it is<br />
probable that they also involved on the digestion of snapped<br />
insects.<br />
Venusfly trap: Dionaea muscipula, Droseraceae<br />
If the insects touch any one of the 6 filaments to cause<br />
both the lobes to close. The stimulus must radiate in all<br />
directions. From the bifurcate leaves towards the margin a<br />
continuous zigzag line of vessels impulse pass through the<br />
whole circumparence of the leaf and the midrib so all the part<br />
of the leaf have some communication. The central<br />
paranchymate cells are larger, loosely attached together and<br />
have delicate walls. The surface of Plants unlike animals do<br />
not have central nervous system. In case of Venus flytrap<br />
they can detect the presence of disturbance on their leaves<br />
by means of trigger hairs on leaf they are stimulated an<br />
electrical signal is generated which causes change in water<br />
pressure in different parts of leaf.<br />
As soon as the Insect is captured interlocking spines<br />
along the margin prevent the escape of the insect and the trap<br />
is more effective. It secrets digestive fluid. The leaf remains<br />
closed until soft tissues of insect body is completely<br />
reabsorbed. It will take one week. The leaf then opens and is<br />
soon ready to entrap other insect (Drosera within a second<br />
open tentacles) will open of filament by a touch followed by<br />
rapid closure of leaves. It captures more beetles from fast<br />
flying one like flies which struck into the sticky fluid. The<br />
most striking thing in Dionaea is in the lobes of a bit if meat<br />
was placed. The glands over the whole leaf surface secrete<br />
copiously. Glands on both sides are pressed against the meat;<br />
the secretion from the first is twice (Jentsch, 1970). Two lobes<br />
comes into close contact, the secretion, containing dissolved<br />
animal matter , spread by capillary attraction, causing fresh<br />
Glenda on both sides to begin secreting in a continually<br />
widening circle, and they are capable of digesting<br />
Reproduction of carnivorous plants<br />
Carnivorous plants reproduce either by sexually or<br />
asexually. In sexual reproduction those plants which produce<br />
flowers they make seeds and they reproduce sexually. In<br />
asexual reproduction, true plants often divide asexually. Side<br />
shoots develops and soon a single rosette becomes two,<br />
occasionally some carnivorous plants produce plantlets on<br />
their flower stalk. This strange behaviour is known as “false<br />
vivipary”.<br />
Cultivation of insectivorous plants<br />
Cultivation in home<br />
Majority of them are grown in indoors. Because it is<br />
more effective in control of house fly. Pot up the plant in<br />
sphagnum moss / sand then plant them up to 12 to 25 mm. (1/<br />
2-1 inch). Hygiene is important. Remove all dead and diseased<br />
leaves. Since majority of them sun lovers best to grown in<br />
south facing, windows, close to the glass. Insufficient light<br />
leads to weakness, which unattractive leads to death.<br />
Artificial light<br />
If we wish to grow in indoors, but in places where<br />
insufficient light is we can go under florescent lighting. Some<br />
lights specially designed available in market. It consists of<br />
light in the red and blue wavelength, so use Gro-lux. Switch<br />
on light for 16 days in summer, 9hours in winter, in spring 16<br />
hrs photoperiod.<br />
Green House of Carnivorous Plants<br />
It is in the green house the majority of them have<br />
advantage. Because we can give the individual requirements.<br />
Different types of green houses are available. It includes cold<br />
frame, warm house and stove house.<br />
Tissue culture<br />
Tissue culture is the greatest utility in rapidly<br />
propagating rate species new cultivars. In ICPS they have the<br />
project on tissue culture of carnivorous plant. First it was<br />
started with the seeds, which were sterilized while keeping<br />
the seeds alive. There is an interesting phenomena associated<br />
with plants they have recently been planted from tissue culture<br />
to regular planting media. Because of hormonal imbalance it<br />
took years. Plants from tissue culture i.e. Sarracenia and<br />
Dionaea may grow in a dense clumped way.<br />
Chemical ecology of Carnivorous plants<br />
Carnivorous plants have flowers, which has some<br />
odours attract the pests. Simons, 1981 studied potentially<br />
carnivorous plant ecology. Most of the species in assemblage<br />
chemically attract their prey. Attraction of prey is an important<br />
one. In many familiar carnivorous plants chemical mimicry<br />
probably aids in the capture of insects Slack, 1979. Nectar<br />
glands help position for capture in many carnivorous plants<br />
including Dionaea, and the Pitcher plants, three families<br />
(Sarraceniaceae, Nepenthaceae, and Cephalotaceae). Various<br />
observations suggests that many species also attack prey<br />
from a distance with odours (and visual cues). Sweet nectar<br />
like scents is produced by many pitcher plant species.
22 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
Noxious Insectivorous Plants<br />
Some of the carnivorous plants Ibicella lutea is one of<br />
the plant, which is noxious because it has long seedpods that<br />
gets snagged in the feet and coats of livestock. Utricularia<br />
inflata will grow very faster in water become denser rapidly in<br />
the lake, possible displacing native species. It is noxious<br />
because of dense mats, which can impede boaters and others<br />
who would prefer open water.<br />
Future thrust<br />
Carnivorous plants are one of the nature’s gifts which<br />
are having lot of medicinal values cure many diseases. We<br />
can utilize it as a curative agent in the agenda of medicine.<br />
These plants have multipurpose value. It has to be<br />
conserved. They are threatened a lot. Some species are no<br />
verge of extinction he world over. In India species like Drosera,<br />
Nepenthes include in red data book. Particularly among the<br />
gardeners because of its medicinal value is the major cause<br />
for decline of these species. They are very sensitive to external<br />
environment. Pollution includes fertilizers, inorganic<br />
pesticides, and effluents from industries again cause decline.<br />
Hence it has to be conserved. Awareness has to be created<br />
among the students and public for its conservation.<br />
LIRETERTURE CITED<br />
Charles darwin, 1888, Insectivorous plants of the world. Dover publs.<br />
New York, pp.197.<br />
Jentsch, E. 1970. A cytochemical study of the leafy gland enzymes of<br />
the genus, Dionaea sp. Preceedings of Am. Phil. Soc., 57: 112-<br />
129.<br />
Lloyd, F. E. 1992. The carnivorous plants, Dover publ. New York,<br />
pp.144.<br />
Somons, H., 1995. What’s new in insectivorous plant physiology and<br />
Mucilaginous seed pellicles? Carnivorous pl. newsl., 8(6): 1-5.<br />
Slack, F. Carnivorous plant odours. Chronica botanica, Watham Mass,<br />
pp.112.<br />
Recieved on 12-01-<strong>2013</strong> Accepted on 15-02-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 23-27, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Expression and Immunogenicity of E2 Glycoprotein Gene of Classical Swine Fever<br />
Virus Cloned in Eukaryotic Expression Vector<br />
NIT<strong>IN</strong> SHARMA 1 , PURSHOTAM KAUSHIK 2 AND ANANT RAI 3<br />
1,2<br />
Department of Botany & Microbiology, Gurukul Kangri Vishwavidyalaya, Haridwar 249 404, UK, India<br />
3<br />
Institute of Biotechnology & Information Technology, 197, Mudia Ahamadnagar, Pilibhit Road,<br />
Bareilly 243 122, UP, India<br />
1<br />
e-mail: nitinsharma.com@gmail.com<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
The E2 glycoprotein of classical swine fever virus (CSFV) is<br />
immunogenic and induces neutralizing antibodies against<br />
CSFV. In the present study the recombinant plasmid pSin.csfv.E2<br />
transfected HeLa cell expressed E2 protein which was confirmed<br />
by immunoperoxidase test. The in vivo immunological response<br />
was studied in pigs immunized through IM route. The immune<br />
response on 28 th day post vaccination induced by 10 µg dose of<br />
the rplasmid revealed protective serum neutralizing antibody<br />
titer 60, while control group showed lower 1:5 non protective<br />
SN titer. Stimulation Index (SI) was found higher in vaccinated<br />
group as compared to healthy control animals. The T-cell<br />
response in the blood of vaccinated pigs suggested the role of<br />
cell mediated immunity in protection apart from neutralizing<br />
antibodies in serum. The challenge test revealed 100%<br />
protection of vaccinated pigs while all control pigs died of csfv<br />
infection. Therefore, this study demonstrates that DNA<br />
vaccination with 10 ìg dose of pSin.csfv.E2 can provide protective<br />
immunity 28 days post vaccination.<br />
Key words<br />
Classical Swine Fever Virus, DNA vaccine, E2 gene,<br />
immunity<br />
Classical swine fever (CSF), also known as hog cholera,<br />
is a highly contagious, multisystemic and hemorrhagic viral<br />
disease, included in the list of diseases notifiable to the OIE,<br />
distributed almost world-wide and is considered the most<br />
economically important but vaccine preventable disease of<br />
swine in areas of intensive pig farming. Natural host of classical<br />
swine fever virus are members of the family Suidae, which<br />
include domestic pigs and wild boars (Depner, et al., 1995;<br />
Laddomada, 2000). A considerable problem is the survival of<br />
CSF virus in wild pig population, which is considered to be<br />
the potential source of the infection.<br />
Genomic virus RNA possessed single ORF. Initially a<br />
polyprotein is formed which is further cleaved cotranslationally<br />
and post-tanslationally by the host and viral genome encoded<br />
proteases to yield four structural (C protein, Erns, E1 and E2)<br />
and seven non structural proteins. Erns, E1 and E2 are the<br />
viral envelope glycoprotein. After infection with CSFV,<br />
antibodies are produced against the structural glycoproteins<br />
E2 and Erns and non structural protein NS3 (Paton, et al.,<br />
1991; Terpstra and Wensvoort, 1988). Antibodies against Erns<br />
and NS3 have only low neutralizing capacity or none at all<br />
(Rumenapf, et al., 1991; Konig et al., 1995). E2 glycoprotein<br />
contains most of the known humoral and cell mediated<br />
protective determinants of CSFV Ceppi, et al., 2005, highly<br />
immunogenic against which most of the neutralizing antibodies<br />
are induced and the only one capable of conferring protection<br />
against CSFV challenge (Rumenapf, et al., 1991; Hulst, et al.,<br />
1993).<br />
Currently in India, attenuated lapinised vaccine is being<br />
used for conferring protection against CSFV. Although it<br />
ensures protection against CSFV, it however requires cold<br />
chain similar to any other live attenuated vaccines (Bouma, et<br />
al., 1999). DNA vaccines have several advantages including<br />
heat tolerance, safety, etc. (Patel, et al., 2007). In addition,<br />
they are also being used as marker vaccines to identify<br />
vaccinated infected and naturally infected animals (Oshop, et<br />
al., 2003).<br />
Considering the advantages of DNA vaccines, in the<br />
present study, the E2 gene of CSFV already cloned into pSin<br />
vector was undertaken for evaluating the immune response<br />
against the recombinant DNA construct (pSin.csfv.E2), for<br />
use as DNA vaccine.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Recombinant plasmid<br />
The recombinant plasmid pSin.csfv.E2 was available in<br />
the Microbiology Laboratory, IBIT, Bareilly. pSin vector<br />
contains replicase gene which produces thousand copies of<br />
gene insert mRNA.<br />
Cell Line<br />
PK-15 and HeLa cell line was obtained from National<br />
Centre for Cell Science (NCCS, Pune). PK-15 cell line was<br />
maintained in EMEM (Sigma, USA), supplemented with 50 ìg/<br />
ml gentamicin (Amresco) and 10 % new born calf serum (Gibco,<br />
NY) and was used for peroxidase based serum neutralization<br />
test. HeLa cell line was used in the study for in vitro expression<br />
analysis of recombinant plasmids (pSin.csfv.E2) and was<br />
maintained in GMEM (Micro lab), supplemented with 10%<br />
new born calf serum (Gibco, NY), penicillin 100 units/ml and<br />
streptomycin 100 µg /ml.<br />
Virus<br />
Virulent classical swine fever virus as well as PK-15 cell<br />
culture adapted CSFV were available in the Laboratory.
24 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
Conjugates and Hyperimmune serum<br />
Direct polyclonal antibody conjugate rabbit anti-mouse<br />
HRPO obtained from Bangalore Genei, Bangalore, was used<br />
in expression analysis of pSin.csfv.E2 and peroxidase based<br />
serum neutralization test and anti-CSFV E2 hyperimmune<br />
serum was raised in mice using recombinant plasmid<br />
(pSin.csfv.E2). The recombinant plasmid (50µg/mouse) was<br />
administered intramuscularly in thigh four times at interval of<br />
one week, to six mice. The blood was collected one week later<br />
from inner canthus of eye of the mouse and serum was<br />
harvested.<br />
In vitro expression analysis<br />
Transfection of HeLa cells<br />
Cells were trypsinised using trypsin-versenate solution<br />
(TVS) and then 4 ml of GMEM (Glasgow modified minimum<br />
essential medium) containing 10% FCS and penicillin and<br />
streptomycin (50 µl/ml) was added, to make cell suspension<br />
of 1X10 5 cells/ml. Harvested exponentially growing cells by<br />
trypsinization and prepared cell suspension in growth medium.<br />
Prepared the calcium phosphate-DNA coprecipitate as follows:<br />
combined 50 µl of 2.5 M CaCl 2<br />
with 10 µl of plasmid DNA in a<br />
sterile microfuge tube, Added 40 ìl DW, kept at room<br />
temperature.<br />
Immediately transfered the calcium phosphate-DNA<br />
suspension using 20 µl suspension for each wells of microtitre<br />
plate. Added 100 µl of cell culture suspension in each wells of<br />
96 wells microtitter plate. Rocked the plate gently to mix the<br />
medium, which will become yellow-orange and turbid. Carried<br />
out this step as quickly as possible because the efficiency of<br />
transfection declines rapidly once the DNA precipitate is<br />
formed. Kept control wells without transfection. Incubated at<br />
37 0 C in a humidified incubator with an atmosphere of 5% CO 2<br />
for 72 hours. Examined for gene expression by IPT.<br />
Raising primary antibody against pSin.csfv.E2 in mice<br />
Primary polyclonal antibody against the CSFV E2 gene<br />
was raised in mouse by hyper immunization of 6 mice with<br />
pSin.csfv.E2 plasmid. 50 µl of plasmid DNA was injected<br />
intramuscularly in tibialis anterior region of hind leg (lateral<br />
region of thigh muscles) of each mouse once a week and<br />
repeated for 4 weeks consecutively. One week later mice were<br />
bled through inner canthus of eyes with a capillary and serum<br />
was prepared.<br />
Immunoperoxidase test (IPT)<br />
After 72 hours, transfected HeLa cells were washed with<br />
1XPBS twice and fixed with 80% chilled acetone at 4 0 C for 10<br />
min and air-dried. Put a few drops of CSFV E2 hyperimmune<br />
serum and incubated at 37 0 C for 1 hr and again washed with<br />
PBS, added a few drops of horseradish peroxidase (HRPO)<br />
conjugated rabbit anti-mouse antibody to wells and incubated<br />
at 37 0 C for 1 hr in a humid chamber. The cells were again<br />
washed with PBS thrice and incubated with 2-3 drops of Nadi<br />
reagent for 5 min. After the development of color, cells were<br />
washed with PBS, dried in air and observed under microscope<br />
and photographed, protocol was carried out as per (Nakane<br />
and Kawaoi, 1974).<br />
Immune response studies<br />
Immunization of piglets<br />
The in vivo experimental setup was designed with eight<br />
weeks old piglets. One week before the start of immunization<br />
trial, all piglets were treated with antihelminthics<br />
(Albendazole). These piglets were then tested for<br />
seronegativity against classical swine fever. Piglets of group<br />
1 were injected intramuscularly with 10 µg recombinant plasmid<br />
(pSin.csfv.E2) in nuclease free water, and group 2 were injected<br />
intramuscularly 10 µg vector alone (pSin) in nuclease free<br />
water, while group 3 were kept as healthy control.<br />
Collection of blood and serum samples<br />
Blood samples were collected from each piglet with a 20<br />
gauge sterile needle of 1.5” length and 5 ml syringes at 0 day<br />
and 28 days of vaccination, from anterior vena cava, which is<br />
the most satisfactory location for obtaining the large blood<br />
samples. For processing under uncoagulated condition, blood<br />
was collected in EDTA coated vials (Unique Lab Aids), while<br />
for serum collection blood was collected in sterilized vials<br />
without any anticoagulant, kept slanted overnight at 4 0 C and<br />
centrifuged at 2,500 rpm for 10 min, serum was collected<br />
without disturbing the clot.<br />
Serum neutralization test (SNT) using NPLA<br />
The neutralizing antibodies in the blood were measured<br />
through neutralizing peroxidase- linked assay (NPLA)<br />
(Terpstra, et al., 1984).<br />
Lymphocyte proliferation assay<br />
Whole blood was collected as per the method described<br />
earlier in EDTA coated vial. 4 ml of lymphocyte separation<br />
medium (LSM 1077, PAA) was taken in a 15 ml conical tube.<br />
Equal volume of whole blood sample was carefully layered<br />
over the LSM. The tubes were centrifuged at 1800 rpm for 30<br />
min at 4°C. Lymphocytes were collected from the plasma-LSM<br />
interface and washed twice with PBS at 1200 rpm for 10 min<br />
and finally the cell pellet was resuspended in 2 ml of RPMI-<br />
1640 growth medium (Sigma) without having phenol red and<br />
supplemented with 10% FCS. The cell count and viability was<br />
determined by Trypan-blue dye exclusion method (Freshney,<br />
2006).The blastogenic response of lymphocytes was assessed<br />
by MTT colorimetry method (Mosmann, 1983).<br />
CSFV challenge<br />
All the pigs were challenged subcutaneously with 1 ml
SHARMA, et al., Expression and Immunogenicity of E2 Glycoprotein Gene of Classical Swine Fever Virus Cloned 25<br />
of 10 5 ID 50<br />
of challenge CSFV after collecting blood and sera<br />
on 28 th day post vaccination. Body temperatures were<br />
monitored daily and clinical symptoms of piglets were<br />
assessed by high temperature, constipation followed by<br />
diarrhea, staggering gait, flushing of skin upto 11 th day after<br />
challenge.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Classical swine fever is a highly contagious and<br />
economically significant disease of domestic pigs and wild<br />
boars. The E2 gene engineered into an expression plasmid<br />
has been evaluated as DNA vaccine against CSF (Ganges, et<br />
al., 2005; Ratta, et al., 2010). E2 is one of the three envelope<br />
glycoprotein of the CSFV that is involved in virus attachment,<br />
entry to target cells, virulence and immunogenicity (Risatti, et<br />
al., 2007).<br />
Expression of recombinant plasmid<br />
The expression ability of recombinant plasmids was<br />
checked by immunoperoxidase test (IPT) in HeLa cell line and<br />
cells were found to express the protein by development of<br />
purple color. Intense purple coloration of cells was observed<br />
in which HeLa cells were transfected with pSin.csfv.E2 (Fig.1),<br />
while healthy cell control did not show any color change.<br />
Table 1. Antibody titer of piglets after immunization<br />
Sl.<br />
No.<br />
stimulation index (SI) of 1.11 at 28 th days of immunization with<br />
cell culture adapted CSFV. Unstimulated samples from each<br />
group maintained maximum absorbance (A 550<br />
) near about 0.7.<br />
The SI (with virus) showed an increasing trend from control<br />
groups to vaccinated groups. The results obtained are<br />
presented in the (Table 2) and (Fig.2).<br />
Table 2.<br />
Groups<br />
Sl. Groups<br />
No.<br />
Antigen specific response of lymphocytes at 28 th<br />
day post immunization as assessed by MTT assay<br />
*<br />
Mean values with a common superscript do not differ significantly at<br />
P
26 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
showed congestion in their mesenteric lymph nodes. Out of<br />
the 2 remaining animals of vector control group, 1 exhibited<br />
weaving gait and one pig showed erythematous lesion on its<br />
limbs. All the 2 pigs of vector control group showed infarction<br />
at the margin of spleen and hemorrhagic lymph nodes typical<br />
of classical swine fever in necropsy (Table 3).<br />
Table 3.<br />
Sl.<br />
No<br />
Groups<br />
Protection test of pigs challenged with 10 5 ID 50<br />
of<br />
CSFV<br />
Pig<br />
No.<br />
1. Vaccinated pSin.csfv.E2 1<br />
(10 µg)<br />
2<br />
3<br />
2. Vector control pSin (10 4<br />
µg) 5<br />
3. Healthy control<br />
6<br />
7<br />
No.<br />
of<br />
pigs<br />
No. of pigs<br />
showing<br />
symptoms<br />
Protection<br />
%<br />
3 0 100<br />
2 2 0<br />
2 2 0<br />
pSin is an alpha virus (Sindbis virus) based plasmid<br />
vector. After entering into the nucleus it is transcribed by<br />
host RNA polymerase enzymes from CMV promoter into a full<br />
length RNA transcript. This full length transcript then acts as<br />
positive sense alpha virus which in turn is translated in<br />
cytoplasm to form replicase protein. This protein serves as<br />
RNA dependent RNA polymerase enzyme and forms negative<br />
sense RNA from positive sense transcript. From this negative<br />
sense strand full length as well as smaller fragments from<br />
subgenomic promoters are transcribed which in-turn is<br />
translated into proteins. Since the cloned insert is downstream<br />
to the subgenomic promoter, the translated proteins represents<br />
our target proteins. The subgenomic promoter of alpha virus<br />
is very strong so that it makes large number of target mRNA<br />
from the sequence downstream to it. Replicase based vectors<br />
are superior over other conventional vectors in terms of its<br />
lower requirement of dose of immunization (Xiong, et al., 1989;<br />
Hariharan, et al., 1998; Berglund, et al., 1998; Leitner, et al.,<br />
2000).<br />
The DNA vaccines induce antigen specific immune<br />
responses (Yokoyama, et al., 1995). Direct injection of DNA<br />
into skeletal muscle results in synthesis of proteins that can<br />
trigger the host immune system (Michel, et al., 1995). In animal<br />
models, DNA vaccines have been shown to elicit a broad<br />
range of immune responses similar to live vaccines (Yasutomi,<br />
et al., 1996). Therefore, the E2 glycoprotein of CSFV is also<br />
being targeted for the specific diagnosis or immunoprophylaxis<br />
of CSF (Beer, et al., 2007; Ganges, et al., 2005). Although the<br />
work on DNA vaccines against various strains of CSFV has<br />
been well focused in many other countries, however, so far no<br />
such reports have been documented against Indian strains<br />
from India. The results of the present study would be useful<br />
for the development of DNA vaccine against CSF disease.<br />
Studies are required to test pSin.CSFV.E2 developed in<br />
inducing protective immune response in domesticated pigs.<br />
The 10 µg dose of pSin.csfv.E2 with regard to their immune<br />
response as assessed on 28 t h day post vaccination by<br />
lymphoproliferative test and stimulation index, SN antibody<br />
titer and was found to confer total protection 28 th days post<br />
vaccination through intramuscular route. Thus, study<br />
confirmed that 10 µg recombinant plasmid was optimum for<br />
induction of immunity and protection in pigs.<br />
The 10 µg dose of pSin.csfv.E2 with regard to their<br />
immune response as assessed on 28th day of post vaccination<br />
by lymphoproliferative test and stimulation index, SN antibody<br />
titer was found to confer total protection on 28th days post<br />
vaccination through intramuscular route.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />
Authors wish to thank the Director, Institute of<br />
Biotechnology & Information Technology, 197, Mudia<br />
Ahamadnagar, Pilibhit Road, Bareilly 243 122, UP, India for<br />
providing necessary facilities to carry out this work.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Beer, M., Reimann, I., Hoffmann, B., Depner, K. 2007. Novel marker<br />
vaccines against classical swine fever. Vaccine, 25: 5665-70.<br />
Berglund, P., Smerdou, C., Fleeton, M.N., Tubulekas, I., Liljestrom, P.<br />
1998. Enhancing immune responses using suicidal DNA vaccines.<br />
Nature Biotechnology, 16: 562-565.<br />
Bouma, A., De Smith, A.J., De Kluijver, E.P., Terpstra, C., Moormann,<br />
R.J.M. 1999. Efficacy and stability of a subunit vaccine based on<br />
glycoprotein E2 of classical swine fever virus. Veterinary<br />
Microbiology, 66:101-14.<br />
Ceppi, M., de Bruin, M.G., Seuberlich, T., Balmelli, C., Pascolo, S.,<br />
Ruggli, N., Wienhold, D., Tratschin, J.D., McCullough, K.C.,<br />
Summerfield, A. 2005. Identification of classical swine fever virus<br />
protein E2 as a target for cytotoxic T cells by using mRNA<br />
transfected antigen-presenting cells. J. General Virology, 86: 2525-<br />
2534.<br />
Depner, K.R., Muller, A., Gruber, A., Rodriguez, A., Bickhardt, K.,<br />
Liess, B. 1995. Classical swine fever in wild boar (Sus scrofa)-<br />
experimental infections and viral persistence. Dtsch Tierarztl<br />
Wochenschr, 102: 381-384.<br />
Freshney, R., I.A.N. 2006. Culture of animal cells: A manual of basic<br />
technique 5 th ed. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, pp.360-362.<br />
Ganges, L., Barrera, M., Nunez, J.I., Blanco, I., Frias, M.T., Rodriguez,<br />
F., Sopbrinio, F. 2005. A DNA vaccine expressing the E2 protein of<br />
classical swine fever virus elicits T cell responses that can prime for<br />
rapid antibody production and confer total protection upon viral<br />
challenge. Vaccine, 23:3741-52.<br />
Hariharan, M.J., Driver, D.A., Townsend, K., Brumm, D., Polo, J.M.,<br />
Belli, B.A., Catton, D.J., Hsu, D., Mittelstaedt, D., McCormack,<br />
J.E., Karavodin, J., Dubensky, T.W., Chang, S.M. Jr, Banks, T.A.<br />
1998. DNA immunization against herpes simplex virus: enhanced<br />
efficacy using a Sindbis virusbased vector. J. Virology, 72: 950-958.<br />
Hulst, M.M., Westra, D.F., Wensvoort, G., Moormann, R.J.M. 1993.<br />
Glycoprotein E1 of hog cholera virus expressed in insect cells<br />
protects swine from hog cholera. J. Virology, 67: 5435-5442.<br />
Konig, M, Lengsfeld, T., Pauly, T., Stark, R., Thiel, H.J. 1995. Classical<br />
swine fever virus: independent induction of protective immunity<br />
by two structural glycoproteins. J. Virology, 69: 6479-6486.
SHARMA, et al., Expression and Immunogenicity of E2 Glycoprotein Gene of Classical Swine Fever Virus Cloned 27<br />
Laddomada, A. 2000. Incidence and control of classical swine fever in<br />
European wild boar. Veterinary Microbiology, 73: 121-130.<br />
Leitner, W.W., Ying, H., Driver, D.A., Dubensky, T.W., Restifo, N.P.<br />
2000. Enhancement of tumor specific immune response with<br />
plasmid DNA replicon vectors. Cancer Research, 60: 51-55.<br />
Michel, M.L., Davis, H.L., Schleef, M., Mancini, M., Tiollais, P.,<br />
Whalen, R.G. 1995. DNA-mediated immunization to the hepatitis<br />
B surface antigen in mice: aspects of the humoral response mimic<br />
hepatitis B viral infection in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Science,<br />
USA. 92:5307-11.<br />
Mosmann, T. 1983. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and<br />
Survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J.<br />
Immunology Method, 65: 55-63.<br />
Nakane, P.K., Kawaoi, A. 1974. Peroxidure-labelled antibody: A new<br />
method of conjugate. J. Histochem Cytochem, 22: 1084.<br />
Oshop, G.L., Elankumaran, S., Vakharia, V.N., Heckert, R.A. 2003. In<br />
ovo delivery of DNA to the avian embryo. Vaccine, 21: 1275-81.<br />
Patel, C., Kataria, R.S., Tiwari, A.K., Gupta, P.K., Kumar, S., Rai, A.<br />
2007. Cloning and expression of fusion gene of Newcastle disease<br />
virus in a eukaryotic expression system. Indian J. Virology, 18:8-12.<br />
Paton, D.J., Ibata, G., Edwards, S., Wensvoort, G. 1991. An ELISA<br />
detecting antibodies to conserved pestivirus epitopes. J. Virology<br />
Method, 31: 315-324.<br />
Ratta, B., Nautiyal, B., Ravindra, P.V., Chaturvedi, U., Kumar, S., Subudhi,<br />
P.K., Chindera, K., Tiwari, S., Barman, N.N., Tiwari, A.K. 2010.<br />
Characterization and expression of E2 glycoprotein of classical<br />
swine fever virus in a eukaryotic expression system. Indian J.<br />
Virology, 21: 69-75.<br />
Risatti, G.R., Holinka, L.G., Sainz, I.F., Carrillo, C., Lu, Z., Borca, M.V.<br />
2007. N-linked glycosylation status of classical swine fever virus<br />
strain brescia E2 glycoprotein influences virulence in swine. J.<br />
Virology, 81:924-33.<br />
Rumenapf, T., Stark, R., Meyers, G., Thiel, H.J. 1991. Structural proteins<br />
of hog cholera virus expressed by vaccinia virus: further<br />
characterization and induction of protective immunity. J. Virology,<br />
65: 589-597.<br />
Terpstra, C., Bloemraad, M., Gielkens, A.J.L. 1984. The neutralizing<br />
peroxidase-linked assay for detection of antibody against swine<br />
fever virus. Veterinary Microbiology, 9: 113-120.<br />
Terpstra, C., Wensvoort, G. 1988. The protective value of vaccine<br />
induced neutralizing antibody titres in swine fever. Veterinary<br />
Microbiology, 16: 123-128.<br />
Yasutomi, Y., Robinson, H.L., Lu, S., Mustafa, F., Lekutis, C., Arthos,<br />
J., Mullins, J.I., Voss, G., Manson, K., Wyand, M., Letvin, N.L.<br />
1996. Simian immunodeficiency virus-specific cytotoxic T-<br />
lymphocyte induction through DNA vaccination of rhesus monkeys.<br />
J. Virology, 70: 678-81.<br />
Yokoyama, M., Zhang, J., Whitton, J.L. 1995. DNA immunization<br />
confers protection against lethal lymphocytic choriomeningitis<br />
virus infection. J. Virology, 69:2684-8.<br />
Xiong, C., Levis, R., Shen, P., Schlesinger, S., Rice, C.M., Huang, H.V.<br />
1989. Sindbis virus: an efficient, broad host range vector for gene<br />
expression in animal cells. Science, 243: 1188-1191.<br />
Recieved on 03-01-<strong>2013</strong> Accepted on 27-02-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 28-30, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Morphological and Anatomical Aspects of Callogenesis and Somatic Embryogenesis<br />
of Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.)<br />
AKSHAYA BHATI 1 AND ATUL CHANDRA 2<br />
1<br />
SK Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner<br />
2<br />
KVK, SK Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner<br />
email: akshaya.horti@gmail.com 1<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
This study was carried out to investigate the morphological<br />
and ana tomical aspe cts of c allo gene sis and soma tic<br />
embryogenesis in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Shoot tip<br />
explants excised from young offshoots were cultured on MS<br />
medium with 2,4-D, BA and 2-ip. Somatic embryogenesis was<br />
produced by transferring the calli produced on BA medium.<br />
Sectioning of specimens was carried out using the Somatic<br />
embryos, callus tissue and its differentiating structures. The<br />
sections were stained with safranin and fast green. Histological<br />
examination of swollen explants, after eight weeks (60 days)<br />
showed formation of new parenchymatous cells resulting into<br />
swelling of explants. The new cells were small, packed densely<br />
and appeared in concentric layers. Around 130-140 days, when<br />
very small amount of callus was seen first, the sections revealed<br />
formation of periclinal concentric layers of cells from the<br />
peripheral region of explants. At this stage, cells surrounding<br />
the callus cells looked empty. Inner region of callus exhibited<br />
a core region composed of densely packed meristematic cells<br />
with cortical zone surrounded by layer cells 1-2 vacuoles. This<br />
region was surrounded by loosely arranged parenchymatous<br />
cells, which constituted the visible callus. Small individualized<br />
embryogenic masses and globular embryos were observed<br />
embedded in degenerating parenchyma, soon they matured<br />
into individual globular embryos surrounded by an epidermal<br />
cell layer. Longitudinal section of further developed embryos<br />
displayed a well differentiated vascular system along the<br />
cotyledon and a fully organized shoot apex.<br />
Key words<br />
Somatic Embryogenesis, Callogenesis, date palm<br />
Date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) is one of the most<br />
important horticultural crop cultivated in arid regions. Date<br />
palm is usually propagated by offshoots, which are mainly<br />
produced during the early life of the palm in limited numbers,<br />
depending on variety and other factors. Propagation by seeds<br />
is undesirable and impractical due to their dioecious nature.<br />
Plant tissue culture techniques have been used to propagate<br />
date palm for rapid and mass multiplication. In spite of great<br />
potential of tissue culture techniques for palms, there are some<br />
difficulties in the propagation of date palm. An extensive effort<br />
has been carried out over the last two decades to establish<br />
effective micropropagation systems. Somatic embryogenesis<br />
has been accomplished in several palms, including date palm,<br />
but only a small percentage of the somatic embryos produce<br />
vigorous plantlets. Increasing the conversion rate of the<br />
embryos to plantlets are very important factors in improving<br />
somatic embryo efficiency.<br />
Studying the morphological and anatomical aspects of<br />
embryogenesis at different stages in tissue culture can be<br />
guide for increasing the effectiveness of the system, in<br />
addition to increasing our knowledge about in vitro associated<br />
phenomena. In few histological studies on date palm somatic<br />
embryogenesis has been done (Davoodi, et al., 2002; Sane, et<br />
al., 2006), although the different investigators have not<br />
reached to the same conclusion about the developmental<br />
pattern of somatic embryos in date palm. The potential for<br />
obtaining somatic embryos from callus tissue produced from<br />
shoot tips and primordial leaves has been reported. This study<br />
has been carried out to investigate the morphological and<br />
anatomical aspects of somatic embryogenesis in cultivar<br />
Halawy and Medjool.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Tissue Culture<br />
Offshoots of date palm cv. Medjool, Shamran and<br />
Halawy separated from adult trees were used as a plant<br />
material. The outer leaves were gradually removed till the<br />
tender portion was reached. The primordial leaf and apical<br />
meristem with sub-apical tissues were excised and kept in<br />
anti-oxidant solution (150 mg/l citric acid + 100 mg/l ascorbic<br />
acid) for 30 minutes. The explants were surface sterilized with<br />
0.1% HgCl 2<br />
containing few drops of Tween-20 with continuous<br />
stirring for 10-12 minutes followed by washing with autoclaved<br />
water for 6-8 times. Shoot tips of 1.5 cm and pieces of internal<br />
leaves were cultured on MS medium supplemented with 10<br />
mg/l 2,4-D + 3 mg/l BA + 1 mg/l 2-ip, additives (100 mg/l inositol,<br />
40 mg/l adenine sulphate, 170 mg/l NaH 2<br />
PO 4<br />
, 200 mg/l<br />
glutamine and 5 mg/l thiamine), 1.5 gm/l activated charcoal.<br />
The cultures were incubated in dark and 27±2ºC. At 15 days<br />
intervals, they were sub-cultured in order to obtain callus<br />
with granular appearance. For inducing morphogenesis, the<br />
MS medium with 0.1 mg/l BA supplemented with additives<br />
(100 mg/l inositol, 40 mg/l adenine sulphate, 170 mg/l NaH 2<br />
PO 4<br />
,<br />
200 mg/l glutamine and 5 mg/l thiamine) was used. Cultures<br />
were incubated under constant light (1000 lux) at 27±2ºC<br />
temperature.<br />
All culture media were solidified with 0.7% agar and<br />
adjusted to pH 5.8 before autoclaving at 1.5 kg/cm 2<br />
for 20<br />
minutes.
BHATI & CHANDRA, Morphological and Anatomical Aspects of Callogenesis and Somatic Embryogenesis 29<br />
Histological studies<br />
The callus tissue and differentiated structure were<br />
sampled at different stages (initial, secondary and differntiated<br />
calli) fixed in FAA (Formalin: Acetic acid: Alochol 90: 5: 5) for<br />
24 hours then dehydrated using 50, 70, 80, 90% and absolute<br />
concentrations of ethanol (Davoodi, et al., 2002). After<br />
dehydration, the specimen were embedded in parrafin and cut<br />
into 5-10 µm sections. The sections were double stained with<br />
safranin and fast green.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The callus induction and its proliferation took a minimum<br />
of 159 days. Histological examination of swollen explants, after<br />
eight weeks (60 days) showed formation of new<br />
parenchymatous cells resulting into swelling of explants. Callus<br />
formation was not, however, evident at this stage. The new<br />
cells were small, packed densely and appear in concentric<br />
layers.<br />
Around 130-140 days, when very small amount of callus<br />
was seen first, the explants were sectioned again. The sections<br />
revealed formation of periclinal concentric layers of cells from<br />
the peripheral region of explants. At this stage, cells<br />
surrounding the callus cells looked empty (Fig. 1a). Inner<br />
region of callus exhibited a core region composed of densely<br />
packed meristematic cells with cortical zone, surrounded by<br />
layer cells with 1-2 vacuoles. This region was surrounded by<br />
loosely arranged parenchymatous cells, which constituted<br />
the visible callus (Fig. 1a).<br />
After about 20-25 days of transfer of primary callus on<br />
induction and maturation medium (MS + additives), the calli<br />
were examined for embryonic masses. The examination revealed<br />
that calli have further proliferated into microcalli comprised of<br />
two zones of cells. In the inner part of microcalli, the cells were<br />
meristematic and small (Fig.1c) with dense cytoplasm without<br />
any visible vacuole. This region was surrounded by loosely<br />
arranged parenchymatous cells, which constituted the bulk<br />
of visible callus (Fig 1a.).<br />
The calli were examined for embryonic masses. The<br />
examination revealed that calli have further proliferated into<br />
microcalli. The cells were meristematic and small (Fig. 1b) with<br />
dense cytoplasm without any visible vacuole. In the outer<br />
part, the cells were embryogenic with less dense cytoplasm<br />
and appeared to be rich in starch. Fragmentation zones were<br />
also visible.<br />
Small individualized embryogenic masses and globular<br />
embryos were observed embedded in degenerating<br />
parenchyma (Fig.2e), soon they matured into individual<br />
globular embryos surrounded by an epidermal cell layer<br />
(Fig.1f). longitudinal section of further developed embryos<br />
displayed a well differentiated vascular system along the<br />
cotyledon and a fully organized shoot apex (Fig.2h).<br />
The shoot apex consisted of a meristematic dome<br />
surrounded by a leaf primordium. The most meristem area,<br />
however was less organized and diffused. This probably led<br />
to precocious germination of abnormal embryos (Sane, et al.,<br />
2006).<br />
Before becoming committed into a new morphogenesis<br />
in vitro programme, somatic cells undergo several successive<br />
physiological processes viz., Organgenetic competence<br />
acquisition, determination for a particular organ formation and<br />
ultimately the organ formation. Reorientation is possible before<br />
the determination step under the influence of PGR’s and the<br />
Fig. 1.<br />
Histological features of shoot morphogenesis in date<br />
palm. (a) Compact Callus (b) Meristematic Zones<br />
(c) Mic rocalli showing proembryonic mas ses<br />
(d) Globular somatic embryos<br />
Fig. 2.<br />
Histological features of shoot morphogenesis in date<br />
palm. (e) Embryo embed ded in to the callus<br />
(f) Epidermal layer of somatic embryo (g) Shoot apex<br />
from somatic embryo (h) Fully organized shoot apex
30 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
totipotency of plant cells confer flexibility to their<br />
organogenetic programs. Observed that cells have to either<br />
die (apotosis) or to differentiate and divide to undergo<br />
morphogenesis patterns such as embryogenesis. It is now<br />
assumed that the plant developmental program can give rise<br />
to alternative pathways have detected the concept of<br />
totipotent cells versus pluripotent cells.<br />
In date palm callus cultures, three phases of<br />
embryogenesis can be determined (i) the acquisition phase,<br />
which is mostly under the influence of a strong auxin like 2,4-<br />
D (100 mg/l), mostly in high concentration (Kackar, et al.,<br />
1989; Yadav, et al., 2001). But also there are reports where low<br />
level of 2,4-D (2 mg/l) were found to be equally effective<br />
(Bhargava, et al., 2003; Zouine, and El-Hadrami, 2007; Taha,<br />
et al., 2007). In majority of these reports BAP / Kn was one of<br />
the cytokinin; (ii) the determination phase for embryogenic<br />
pathway mostly depending on an auxin like NAA / IAA with<br />
or without a cytokinin (2.5-10 mg/l, Bhargava, et al., 2003;<br />
Zouine and El-Hadrami, 2007; Taha, et al., 2007), (iii)<br />
differentiating phase where maturation and germination occurs<br />
under the influence of a cytokinin/ auxin or only ½MS medium.<br />
In present investigation, it looks not less than 15 days<br />
when primary callus was produced under the influence of 2,4-<br />
D + BA at places it was composed of meristematic zones<br />
surrounded by parenchymatous cortex. However, uptill this<br />
stage it was difficult to ascertain that whether these<br />
meristematic structures would develop into shoots or<br />
embryos. However, the presence of meristematic zones in<br />
primary callus indicated the acquisition of competence, the<br />
first stage of embryogenesis. Although in the callus induction<br />
medium BAP (3 mg/l) was present but dominating role of 2,4-<br />
D (10-100 mg/l) was evident. Auxins have many effects and<br />
can modulated diverse processes and tropic responses.<br />
Exogenous auxins are assumed to orient developmental<br />
pathways and to favour either callogenesis or rhizogenesis.<br />
In our experiments when primary competent callus was<br />
transferred on to maturation medium, globular embryogenic<br />
masses and embryos were observed within 20-25 days (Fig.<br />
2d) due to hard well developed vascular supply. Absence of<br />
phytohormones has been reported to favour embryo<br />
maturation in various date palm tissue culture studies (Kackar,<br />
et al., 1989 and Yadav, et al., 2001).<br />
It is well established that 2,4-D plays a role in the<br />
induction of somatic embryogenesis which is presumably<br />
mediated by a signal cascade triggered by this exogenous<br />
auxin (Zouine and El Hadrami, 2007).<br />
Increasing the proportion of cytokinin in the hormonal<br />
balance is thought to promote the expression of somatic<br />
embryogenesis and later development of embryos. In present<br />
investigation low level of cytokinin (BA, 3 mg/l) was more<br />
effective in maturation of somatic embryos. Bhargava, et al.,<br />
2003 have observed that both the level of 2,4-D in the callus<br />
induction medium and level of cytokinin (0.25 mg/l) was very<br />
important for normal somatic embryos induction. More high<br />
was the level of these hormones, more was the number of<br />
abnormal embryos.<br />
Sane, et al., 2006 have also observed that application of<br />
cytokinin (BA) promoted the appearance of meristematic<br />
territories in the tissues whose successive divisions led to<br />
polarization of the pro-embryo within 3-4 weeks of culture.<br />
They undertook a detailed study of histological events during<br />
somatic embryogenesis in date palm and has described<br />
different stages: the division of perivascular cells on primary<br />
explants, the secondary caulogenesis in primary, the<br />
unicellular or pluricellular origin of the embryos and the<br />
development of embryos into complete explants. All these<br />
stages were observed in present study as well. Abnormal<br />
embryos and precocious germination of embryos was also<br />
observed in present study. This could be due to precocious<br />
cell reactivation as suggested by Gueye, et al., 2009. As for<br />
many monocotyledons, callogenesis is a prerequisite for the<br />
initiation of somatic embryos and requires the presence of an<br />
auxin in the medium (Davoodi, et al., 2002).<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Bhargava, S.C., Saxena, S.N. and Sharma, R. 2003. In vitro<br />
multiplication of Phoenix dactylifera. J. Plant Biochemistry and<br />
Biotechnology. 12: 43-47.<br />
Davoodi, D., Majidi, E. and Khoshkam, S. 2002. Some morphological<br />
and anatomical aspects of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) somatic<br />
embryogenesis in tissue culture. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 4: 63-71.<br />
Gueye, B., Said Ahmed, H., Morcillo, F., Borgel, A., Sane, D., Hilbert,<br />
J.L., Verdeil, J.L. and Blervacq, A.S. 2009. Callogenesis and<br />
rhizogenesis in date palm leaf segments are there similarities between<br />
the two auxin induced pathways. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture.<br />
98: 47-58.<br />
Kackar, N.C. ; Solanki, K.R. and Joshi, S.P. 1989. Micropropagation of<br />
Date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Khadrawy using tissue culture<br />
technique. Ann. of Arid Zone, 28: 137-141.<br />
Sane, D., Aberlenc-Bertossi, F., Gassama-Dia, K., Sagna, M., Trouslot, F.,<br />
Duval, Y. and Borgel, A. 2006. Histocytological analysis of callogenesis<br />
and somatic embryogenesisfrom cell suspensions of date palm<br />
(Phoenix dactylifera L.). Annals of Botany. 98: 301-308.<br />
Taha, H.S., Hassan, N.M. and Al-Bahr. 2007. Micropropagation of<br />
some Egyptian date palm dry cultivars 1- maturation of somatic<br />
embryos. Arab J. Biotech. 10(2): 333-340.<br />
Yadav, N., Yadav, R.C., Chowdhury, V.K. and Chowdhury, J.B. 2001.<br />
Explant and cultivar response to in vitro clonal propagation of<br />
female date palm. Paper presented in II nd International Conference<br />
on Date palm (Al- Ain, UAE, March 25-27).<br />
Zouine, J. and El Hadrami, I. 2007. Effect of 2,4-D, glutamine and<br />
BAP on embryogenic suspension culture of date palm (Phoenix<br />
dactylifera L.). Scientia Horticultrae, 112: 221-226.<br />
Recieved on 04-12-2012 Accepted on 18-11-2012
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 31-32, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Successful Therapeutic Management of Snake Bite in A Dog<br />
SONAL SHRIVASTAVA 1 , DEBOSRI BHOWMICK 2 AND P.C. SHUKLA 3<br />
1,2<br />
Department of Veterinary Surgery & Radiology, 3 Department of Veterinary Medicine College of Veterinary<br />
Science & A.H., N.D.V.S.U., Jabalpur<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
A dog was brought to the hospital with the history of snake bite<br />
in the forelimb. The snake was caught and identified by the<br />
snake expert, to be Russell’s viper. Clinical examination<br />
revealed swelling of the bitten limb with oozing of blood from<br />
the bitesite. Dullness, depression, vomition and frothy<br />
salivation were also observed. The dog was treated with the<br />
Snake Venom Antiserum. Supportive therapy icluding<br />
intravenous fluid (5% DNS), Paracetamol, Atropine Sulphate,<br />
Ranitidine Hydrochloride, Dexamethasone, Botropase,<br />
Ceftriaxone and Tetanus Toxoid was also given. The dog<br />
recovered completely in 5 days.<br />
Key words<br />
Dog, Russell’s Viper, snake bite, snake venom<br />
antiserum<br />
Snake bite, with envenomation, is a true emergency with<br />
significant morbidity and mortality in canines. In comparison<br />
to other domestic animals, fatal snakebites are more common<br />
in dogs due to their relatively small size, in proportion to the<br />
amount of venom injected at the bitesite. In India, the Big<br />
Four are the four venomous snake species responsible for<br />
causing the most snake bite cases. According to Whitaker,<br />
1990, the big four includes, Indian cobra (Naja naja), Common<br />
krait (Bungarus caeruleus), Russell’s viper (Daboia russelii),<br />
and Saw-scaled viper (Echis carinatus). The present paper<br />
describes snake bite in a dog and its successful therapeutic<br />
management.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Case History and Clinical Examination<br />
A male German Shepherd dog aged 4 years was brought<br />
to the hospital with the history of snake bite in the forelimb.<br />
According to the owner the snake was caught and identified<br />
by the snake expert, to be Russell’s viper. Clinical examination<br />
revealed swelling of the bitten limb with oozing of blood from<br />
the bitesite (Fig.1). Fang marks were noticed at the site (Fig.2).<br />
The dog was dull and depressed; vomiting and frothy<br />
salivation were also observed. Haemato-biochemical<br />
parameters did not show any significant alterations.<br />
Therapeutic Management<br />
The dog was treated with the Snake Venom Antiserum<br />
(Lyophilised, Polyvalent, Enzyme refined, Equine<br />
Immunoglobulins). Freeze dried powder was reconstituted with<br />
10 ml of sterile water for injection supplied with the vial.<br />
Reconstituted antivenom was administered by slow<br />
intravenous injection (2 ml/minute). Intravenous fluid therapy<br />
(500 ml of 5% DNS), injection Paracetamol @ 15mg/kg b.wt.<br />
IM, injection Atropine Sulphate @ 0.04 mg/kg b.wt. IV, injection<br />
Ranitidine Hydrochloride @ 2 mg/kg b.wt. IV, injection<br />
Dexamethasone @ 0.15 mg/kg b.wt. IV, injection Botropase<br />
1ml IV, and Tetanus Toxoid 2 ml IM were also administered. In<br />
addition, injection Ceftriaxone 500 mg IV was administered for<br />
5 days. Betadine solution was topically applied on the bitesite.<br />
Fig. 1.<br />
The bitesite on the forelimb. Note the swelling and<br />
oozing of blood.<br />
Fig. 2.<br />
Fang marks at the bitesite
32 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
Fig. 3. Animal recovered completely after 5 days<br />
The supportive therapy was continued for 5 days. The animal<br />
completely recovered after 5 days of treatment (Fig.3).<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Snake venom is highly modified saliva containing<br />
zootoxins. According to Halliday and Tim, 2002 venoms<br />
contain more than 20 different compounds, mostly proteins<br />
and polypeptides. A complex mixture of proteins, enzymes,<br />
and various other substances with toxic and lethal properties<br />
are responsible for the biological effects (Bauchot, 1994). In<br />
the case of Russell’s viper the usual manifestations comprise<br />
persistent pain and swelling of the bitten limb with oozing of<br />
blood from the bitesite. It may be followed by generalized<br />
vascular injury with severe external and internal haemorrhage.<br />
Death may result from cardio vascular shock or renal failure.<br />
Antivenom should be administered as soon as possible after<br />
the diagnosis of envenomation. Antivenin is highly beneficial<br />
because its action is the only direct and specific mechanism<br />
for neutralizing snake venom. Moderate to severe pain caused<br />
by snake bite responds well to paracetamol. Envenomation<br />
requires intensive treatment, starting with IV fluids to combat<br />
hypotension. Administration of corticosteroids helps to<br />
control shock, protect against tissue damage caused due to<br />
envenomation, and reduces the possible allergic reactions to<br />
antivenin. Tetanus antitoxin and antibacterial agents are<br />
administered to prevent tetanus and bacterial infections<br />
respectively, as the fangs of snake are likely to contain<br />
bacteria. Other supportive treatment (eg. antacids, haemostats<br />
etc.) is given as and when needed.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Bauchot, R. 1994. Snakes: A Natural History. New York City, NY, USA:<br />
Sterling Publishing Co., Inc. pp. 194-209.<br />
Halliday, A. and Tim, Kraig 2002. Firefly Encyclopedia of Reptiles and<br />
Amphibians. Toronto, Canada: Firefly Books Ltd. pp. 202-203<br />
Whitaker, Z. 1990. Snakeman. Penguin Books Ltd. pp. 192.<br />
Recieved on 08-11-2012 Accepted on 23-01-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 33-35, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Biology and Feeding Potential of Cheilomenus sexmaculata (Fab.) on Bean Aphid<br />
(Aphis craccivora Koch) and Mustard Aphid (Liphaphis erysimi L.)<br />
AKSHAY KUMAR, C.S. PRASAD AND G.N. TIWARI<br />
Department of Entomology, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Uni. of Agric. and Tech., Meerut (U.P.) India<br />
email: akshaypanwar1259@gmail.com<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
An experiment “biology and feeding potential of Cheilomenus<br />
sexmaculata on bean aphid (Aphis craccivora Koch) and mustard<br />
aphid (Liphaphis erysimi L.)” was carried out at Biocontrol<br />
Laboratory, S.V.P.U.A. & T., Meerut (U.P.) India. The ladybird<br />
beetle C. sexmaculata completed their life cycle in 18-27 days. C.<br />
sexmaculata laid eggs ranged 150-210 eggs during her life period.<br />
The 1 st , 2 nd , 3 rd and 4 th instar larval period lasted for 2.67±0.33<br />
days (ranged 2-3 days), 2.00±0.58 (ranged 1-3 days), 2.67±0.33<br />
(ranged 2-3 days) and 4.00±0.58 (ranged 3-5 days), respectively.<br />
Fourth and final instar grubs were deep black in colour, when<br />
freshly moulted but changed to dull black in colour before prepupation.<br />
The pre-pupal period was lost in 2.67±0.33 (ranged 2-<br />
3 days) while the pupal period was lost in 4.67±0.33 (ranged 4-5<br />
days). Male and female beetles survived for 29-33 and 33-38 days<br />
with a mean survival period of 30.67±0.88 and 35.33±1.45 days,<br />
respectively. The total number of aphid consumed during whole<br />
larval duration of C. sexmaculata varied from 70-95 Aphis<br />
craccivora and 63-85 Lipaphys erysimi, respectively. A male beetle<br />
consumed 510.33±9.82 A. craccivora (ranged 500-521 aphids) and<br />
410.33±4.26 L. erysimi (ranged 400-416 aphids), with an average<br />
of 28.72 A. craccivora and 32.92 L. erysimi per day, respectively.<br />
While, a female beetle consumed 718.00±17.21 A. craccivora<br />
(ranged 710-725 aphids) and 555.67±27.63 L. erysimi (ranged 547-<br />
571 aphids), respectively with an average of 35.93 A. craccivora<br />
and 27.90 L. erysimi per day, respectively.<br />
Key words<br />
Biology, Feeding potential, Cheilomenus sexmaculata,<br />
aphid<br />
In balanced ecosystem, insect pest are kept in check by<br />
their natural enemies (predators and parasitoids) these agents<br />
are beneficial in agricultural systems. Cheilomenus<br />
sexmaculata is an important predator of aphid, coccids,<br />
psyllids and many ecosystems of South East Asia (Parker, et<br />
al., 1976; Gupta and Yadava, 1986; Lokhanda and Mohan,<br />
1990; Hussein, et al., 1991; Maisini, et al., 1994). It is an<br />
effective predator to be used as bio-control agent but the<br />
major challenge is its mass rearing and augmentation. Hence<br />
the present study was therefore, conducted biology and<br />
feeding potential of C. sexmaculata (Fab.) on bean aphid<br />
(Aphis craccivora Koch) and mustard aphid (Liphaphis<br />
erysimi L.).<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Biology of Cheilomenus sexmaculata<br />
A pair of beetles was placed in raring jar with sufficient<br />
amount of aphids as food and substrate for egg laying. The<br />
eggs laid by female on the surface of glass jars and given<br />
substrates were removed with the help of a moist camel hair<br />
brush, while those deposited on the substrate were removed<br />
along with the substrate. Care was taken so that the eggs<br />
were not damaged.<br />
Study of incubation period<br />
Ten eggs of each coccinellid beetles were kept in a<br />
plastic vial. To maintain the moisture, the bottom of the vial<br />
was covered with moistened filter papers. These eggs were<br />
checked twice per day i.e. 10 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. to observe the<br />
incubation period and number of eggs hatched.<br />
Larval period<br />
The larval period was recorded from the day of hatching.<br />
Neonates which hatched from the eggs kept for incubation<br />
were used for the study. Rearing of the larvae were carried out<br />
individually in plastic vials (14X1.5) and aphid of almost<br />
different size were provided as food. Fresh aphids were<br />
provided to the growing larvae every morning. To observe<br />
the moulting of the developing larvae, the exuviae were<br />
checked twice daily at morning and evening hours. The<br />
duration of all larval (grubs) instars were recorded<br />
continuously from 1 st to 4 th instar.<br />
Pre-pupal to pupal period<br />
The pre-pupal period i.e., the period when the 4 th instar<br />
grub stopped feeding up to the period when it was completely<br />
transformed in to pupa, was also observed.<br />
Emergence of adults from pupae<br />
For studying the pupal period, freshly formed pupae<br />
from the batch of the grub used for grub period studies were<br />
kept in rearing plastic vials and observations on the emergence<br />
of coccinellids beetles from the pupae were recorded twice<br />
daily.<br />
Oviposition period and adult longevity<br />
Newly emerged adults were released in pairs in rearing<br />
glass jar to observe the duration of mating and ovipositon<br />
period. The adults after emergence were sexed on the basis of<br />
shape and size as well as morphological character. It was<br />
observed that the males were smaller than the females in<br />
general. After pairing, their mating behaviour was also studied<br />
by daily visual observations. To study adult longevity, newly
34 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
emerged adults were kept in rearing jar and were provided<br />
with aphids as food materials. Fresh food was provided every<br />
day and observations on the mortality, if any, were recorded.<br />
Feeding potential of C. sexmaculata<br />
Fifty or sixty freshly collected aphids for adult<br />
coccinellids and 10 for grubs viz., A. craccivora and Lipaphis<br />
erysimi were placed on fresh and tender mustard and bean<br />
leaves/twigs, respectively. The aphids were then allowed to<br />
settle. Different instars of grubs and adults of coccinellids<br />
starved for 2 hours except first instar grub were released singly<br />
inside each petridish with the help of a fine hair brush. The<br />
daily consumption by instars all of larvae and adult of<br />
coccinellids was calculated. Thereafter, the number of<br />
unconsumed aphids left over in the petridishes were collected<br />
daily and calculated for consumed ones. The actual number<br />
of aphids consumed by grubs/adult was obtained by<br />
subtracting the number of aphids left over from the total number<br />
of aphids supplied every day.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Description of different stages of C. sexmaculata<br />
Egg<br />
Freshly laid eggs were cigar shaped, yellow in colour<br />
with smooth chorion and without any reticulations. The eggs<br />
turned blackish with advancement of age and became<br />
completely black before hatching. The eggs were usually laid<br />
in clusters of 4 to 10 and each cluster consisted of 5 to 25<br />
eggs. Number of eggs laid by an individual female of C.<br />
sexmaculata ranged from 150-210 eggs during her life period.<br />
These findings are supported by the findings of Zala, 1995<br />
and Tank, et al., 2007. The incubation period varied from 2-4<br />
days with an average of 3.00±0.58 days (Table 1), which is in<br />
accordance with the findings of Tank, et al., 2007.<br />
Grub<br />
During the present study, it was observed that the larvae<br />
of C. sexmaculata moulted thrice and thus there were four<br />
instars. Freshly hatched larvae were dark grey in colour with<br />
shining dark head capsule and legs. The first instar larval<br />
period lasted for 2.67±0.33 days (ranged 2-3 days) (Table 1).<br />
Second instar larvae were glistening black in colour with<br />
yellow coloured head capsule and black legs. Development<br />
of white coloured patches on meso and metathorax and also<br />
on fourth and sixth abdominal segments was observed. The<br />
second instar larval period lasted in 2.00±0.58 (ranged 1-3<br />
days) (Table 1).<br />
The freshly moulted third instar larvae were dull black in<br />
colour with yellow head capsule. The colour pattern was more<br />
intensified with additional development of white spots on<br />
mid-dorsal line of other segments except prothorax. The third<br />
instar larval period was lost in 2.67±0.33 (ranged 2-3 days).<br />
Table 1. Developmental period of different stages of C.<br />
sexmaculata<br />
S. No. Stage<br />
Duration (days)<br />
Range Mean*<br />
1 Egg (incubation period) 2-4 3.00±0.58<br />
2 Grub<br />
First instar<br />
Second instar<br />
Third instar<br />
Fourth instar<br />
2-3<br />
1-3<br />
2-3<br />
3-5<br />
2.67±0.33<br />
2.00±0.58<br />
2.67±0.33<br />
4.00±0.58<br />
3. Pre-pupa<br />
Pupa<br />
2-3<br />
4-5<br />
2.67±0.33<br />
4.67±0.33<br />
4 Adult longevity<br />
(a) Female<br />
(b) Male<br />
33-38<br />
29-33<br />
35.33±1.45<br />
30.67±0.88<br />
5 Total period taken from egg<br />
laying to adult emergence<br />
16-26<br />
*Mean of three replications with 10 pairs of adult male and females<br />
Fourth and final instar grubs were deep black in colour, when<br />
freshly moulted but changed to dull black in colour before<br />
pre-pupation. It developed additional rectangular dark grey<br />
spots in a continuous series mid-dorsally on abdominal<br />
segments, whereas the spots on the fourth abdominal segment<br />
were white. The fourth instar larval period was lost in 4.00±0.58<br />
(ranged 3-5 days) (Table 1).<br />
The present investigation revealed that the mean<br />
duration of first, second, third and fourth instars larvae of C.<br />
sexmaculata were 2.67±0.33, 2.00±0.58, 2.67±0.33 and 4.00±0.58<br />
days respectively and the total larval period lasted for 8-14<br />
days. Whereas Tank and Korat, 2007 observed that the mean<br />
duration of first, second, third and fourth larval instars were<br />
1.80±0.50, 1.72±0.46, 1.88±0.53 and 1.96±0.73 respectively and<br />
the total larval period ranged from 5-10 days. More or less<br />
nearest values of duration of different larval instars had been<br />
recorded by Rai, et al., 2003.<br />
Pre-pupa and Pupa<br />
When larva was about to pupate, it turned wood brown<br />
in colour and assumed curved shape and attached itself<br />
posteriorly to the substrate. The pre-pupal period was lost in<br />
2.67±0.33 (ranged 2-3 days) while the pupal period was lost in<br />
4.67±0.33 (ranged 4-5 days) (Table 1). Freshly formed pupae<br />
appered shinning yellow in colour which later on became pale<br />
appering orange yellow in colour. There were symmetrically<br />
orange black spots on each segment. This is in accordance<br />
with the report of Sureja, 1991 and Tank and Korat, 2007<br />
observed pre-pupal and pupal period was 1.72±0.45 and<br />
3.36±0.70 days respectively.<br />
Adult<br />
Freshly emerged adults were soft bodied, yellowish in<br />
colour without any markings which turned shining yellow or<br />
warm buff with black spots which developed gradually. The<br />
adults were small, oval, convex dorsally and flat ventrally.<br />
Abdomen and eyes were light yellow in colour whereas elytra<br />
and pronotum were marked with zigzag markings. Similar
KUMAR, et al., Biology and feeding potential of Cheilomenus sexmaculata (Fab.) on bean aphid (Aphis craccivora Koch) 35<br />
description had also been narrated by Sureja, 1991. Male and<br />
female beetles survived for 29-33 and 33-38 days with a mean<br />
survival period of 30.67±0.88 and 35.33±1.45 days, respectively<br />
(Table 1). Tank, et al., 2007 reported that the male and female<br />
beetles survived from 10-21 and 15-26 days respectively and<br />
also observed that the longevity of male without food (prey)<br />
was 2 to 4 (2.5±0.68) days while for female it was 3 to 5<br />
(3.35±0.58) days, indicating females survived slightly longer<br />
than the males in absence of food supporting the view that<br />
females survived longer than the males. Tank, et al., 2007<br />
reported that the average duration of entire life- span for male<br />
and female was 29.72±2.20 and 34.15±2.54 days, respectively.<br />
Feeding potential of C. sexmaculata<br />
For studying feeding potential of C. sexmaculata, the<br />
observations were recorded at temperature varying between<br />
21.0 and 25.0 0 C with a relative humidity of 61 to 64 per cent.<br />
The data presented in Table 2 indicates that the rate of feeding<br />
among different larval instars and adult varies greatly.<br />
Larval feeding potential<br />
First instar grub consumed an average of 10.67±0.882 A.<br />
craccivora (ranged 8-12 aphids) and 6.33±0.33 L. erysimi<br />
(ranged 5-8 aphids), respectively (Table 2). The second instar<br />
grub consumed an average 24.33±3.67 A. craccivora (ranged<br />
20-28 aphids) and 20.00±3.66 L. erysimi (ranged 16-25 aphids).<br />
The third instar grub consumed an average of 24.67±0.88 A.<br />
craccivora (ranged 21-26 aphids) and 21.67±0.88 L. erysimi<br />
(ranged 18-24 aphids), respectively. The fourth and final instar<br />
grub consumed an average of 26.33±8.19 A. craccivora (ranged<br />
21-29 aphids) and 26.00±0.58 L. erysimi (ranged 24-28 aphids),<br />
respectively. The total number of aphid consumed during<br />
whole larval duration varied from 70-95 A. craccivora and 63-<br />
85 L. erysimi, respectively. Chowdhury, et al., 2008 recorded<br />
that the first, second, third and fourth instar grubs of C.<br />
sexmaculata were consumed 21.70±5.81, 27.10±7.42,<br />
72.60±5.32 and 186.30±24.59 aphid, respectively, during their<br />
developmental period. However, Pandey and Khan, 2002<br />
reported that generally grubs consumed more aphids than<br />
adults.<br />
Adult<br />
The observed data indicates that, a male beetle<br />
Table 2.<br />
Feeding potential of predatory coccinellid beetle,<br />
C. sexmaculata<br />
Insect stages Consumed A. craccivora<br />
(No.)<br />
Consumed L. erysimi<br />
(No.)<br />
1 st instar 10.67±0.882 6.33±0.33<br />
Grub<br />
2 nd instar 24.33±3.67 20.00±3.66<br />
3 rd instar 24.67±0.88 21.67±0.88<br />
4 th instar 26.33±8.19 26.00±0.58<br />
Male 510.33±9.82 410.33±4.26<br />
Female 718.00±17.21 555.67±27.63<br />
Total consumed 1314.33±23.38 1040.00±30.24<br />
CD > 0.05%<br />
SE (m)<br />
36.999<br />
12.081<br />
*mean of 10 pairs of adult male and females<br />
47.869<br />
15.630<br />
consumed 510.33±9.82 A. craccivora (ranged 500-521 aphids)<br />
and 410.33±4.26 L. erysimi (ranged 400-416 aphids), with an<br />
average of 28.72 A. craccivora and 32.92 L. erysimi per day,<br />
respectively (Table 2). While, a female beetle consumed<br />
718.00±17.21 A. craccivora (ranged 710-725 aphids) and<br />
555.67±27.63 L. erysimi (ranged 547-571 aphids), respectively<br />
with an average of 35.93 A. craccivora and 27.90 L. erysimi<br />
per day, respectively. Chowdhury, et al., 2008 recorded that<br />
adult male and female Cheilomenes sexmaculata consumed<br />
825.90±64.11 and 1177.80±66.57 aphid, respectively, during<br />
their life span.<br />
The total consumption of A. craccivora and L. erysimi<br />
by the larva and adult of C. sexmaculata was 1314.33±23.38<br />
(1252-1355 aphids) and 1040.00±30.24 (ranged 995-1115<br />
aphids), respectively. Chowdhury, et al., 2008 recorded that<br />
the adult male and female Cheilomenes sexmaculata<br />
consumed 825.90±64.11 and 1177.80±66.57 aphid, respectively,<br />
during their life span<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />
Authors are very grateful to ICAR funded project “Niche<br />
Area of Excellence Programme” for their financial support<br />
during experimental work.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Chowdhury, S.P., Ahad, M.A. and Husan, M.S. 2008. Biology of ladybird<br />
beetle Micraspis discolors Fab.(Coccinella : Coleoptera). Int. J.<br />
Sustain. Crop. Prod., 3(3): 39-44.<br />
Gupta, B.M. and Yadava, C.P.S. 1989. The Role of Coccinellids predators<br />
in regulating the aphid (Myzus persicae) Sulzer Population on<br />
Common in field. Indian J. Entomol., 51: 24-8.<br />
Hussien, M.Y., Tan, H.S. and Rizvi, M.Z. 1986. Biology, nutritional<br />
requirement and predation efficiency of Menochilus sexmaculata<br />
Fab. Coleoptera Coccinellidae. Proc.2 nd Intl. Conf. Plant protection<br />
in Tropics, March 17-20, Genting High land Malaysia. pp.380-9.<br />
Lokhande, R.K. and Mohan, P. 1990. Study in biocontol of aphid Aphis<br />
craccivora Koch. By ladybird beetle, Menochilus sexmaculata F. in<br />
Chillies. Adv. Plant Sci., 3: 281-6.<br />
Maisini, N.S., Hassan, T.S. and Sajab, A.S. 1994. Within plant distribution<br />
patterns of predators on chilli plant. Proc. 4 th Intl. Conf. on Plant<br />
Protection in the Tropics, March 28-31, Kualalumpur. pp.96.<br />
Pandey, A.K. and Khan, M.A. 2002. Feeding potential of Coccinella<br />
septempunctata L. (Coccinellidae: Coleoptera) on mustard aphid,<br />
Myzus persicae Sulzer. Pestology, 26(1): 23-26.<br />
Parker, B.L., Ming, N.S. Peng, T.S. and Singh, G. 1976. The effect of<br />
Maslation on fecundity, Longivity and Geotropism of Menochilus<br />
sexmaculata. Environ. Entomol., 5: 575-9.<br />
Rai, M.K., Ramamurthy, V.V. and Singh, P.K. 2003. Observations on the<br />
biology of the coccinellid predator, Cheilomenes sexmaculata (Fab)<br />
on Aphis craccivora. Annals of Plant Protection Science, 11: 7-10.<br />
Sureja, B.V. 1991. Bioecology and utilization of predatory coccinellids<br />
for the management of aphid. Ph. D. thesis, Rajasthan Agricultural<br />
University, Udaipur, India.<br />
Tank, B.D., Korat, D.M. and Borad, P.K. 2007. Determination of Dominant<br />
Species of Predatory Coccinellid in Anand Region of Gujarat. Karnataka<br />
Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 20(3): 637-638.<br />
Recieved on 15-12-2012 Accepted on 25-02-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 36-39, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Survey, Vector Relationships and Host Range Studies of Tomato Leaf Curl Karnataka<br />
Virus Causing Sunflower Leaf Curl Disease<br />
VANITHA, L.S. 1 , RANGASWAMY, K.T. 1 , GOV<strong>IN</strong>DAPPA, M.R. 2 , MANJUNATHA, L. 1 , SHIVAKUMAR S.<br />
CH<strong>IN</strong>CHURE 2 AND GOVARDHANA, M. 1<br />
1<br />
Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru 560 065, Karnataka,<br />
India<br />
2<br />
Main Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur 584 102, Karnataka, India<br />
1<br />
e-mail: vanithalakshmanaih@gmail.com<br />
ABSTACT<br />
Sunflower leaf curl disease (SuLCD) is a recently reported<br />
disease in India. The survey revealed the occurrence of the<br />
disease in the range between 8.00-58.20 per cent. Twenty<br />
viruliferous whiteflies were required for 100% transmission<br />
of SuLCV from Sunflower to Sunflower. Among twelve plant<br />
species tested for infectivity by sunflower leaf curl virus,<br />
Nicotiana benthamiana, Lycopersicon esculentum, Zinnia elegans,<br />
Acanthospermum hispidum and Parthenium hysterophorus took<br />
infection and developed symptoms.<br />
Key words<br />
Sunflower, leaf cu rl, whitefly, b egomovirus,<br />
viruliferous<br />
Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is one of the three<br />
important edible oilseed crops grown in the world, after<br />
soybean and groundnut. The major sunflower producing<br />
states are Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra. The<br />
crop has been found suffering from few viral diseases of which<br />
sunflower leaf curl disease (SuLCD) caused by a begomovirus<br />
is the recent one. Leaf curl disease on sunflower was first<br />
reported on sunflower hybrids in Main Research Station,<br />
Raichur District, Karnataka, India with disease incidence up<br />
to 40% during 2009 (Govindappa, et al., 2011).<br />
Viruses of genus Begomovirus, family Geminiviridae<br />
are circular single-stranded DNA plant pathogens which cause<br />
damage to many crop plants in many continents. Among these<br />
viruses, whitefly [Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius)]-transmitted<br />
begomoviruses are considered to be one of the largest and<br />
most important groups of plant viruses infecting a wide range<br />
of crops, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. They<br />
can be monopartite or bipartite depending upon the presence<br />
of one (DNA-A) or two (DNA-A and DNA-B) genomic<br />
components, each of approximately 2.5–2.8 kb size (Stanley,<br />
1983).<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Survey for Sunflower Leaf Curl Disease<br />
Surveys were conducted from 2011 to 2012 to determine<br />
the incidence of SuLCD in major sunflower growing areas of<br />
Raichur, Koppal, Tumkur, Chitradurga, Kolar, Chikkaballapur<br />
and Bengaluru in Karnataka. Disease incidence was recorded<br />
based on the visual observation of the affected plants.<br />
Collection and maintenance of virus and whitefly vector<br />
Sunflower leaves with characteristic leaf curl symptoms<br />
on hybrid (Sun breed 275) were collected from the field of<br />
Main Research Station, Raichur. A virus free colony of B.<br />
tabaci was established on cotton plants. Whiteflies were<br />
allowed 24-h acquisition access period (AAP) on source plants<br />
and transferred to susceptible sunflower hybrid (Sun breed-<br />
275) for 24 h inoculation access period (IAP). Inoculated plants<br />
were maintained in the greenhouse and observed for symptom<br />
development. Plants that developed leaf curl and other<br />
begomovirus specific symptoms were transferred to a separate<br />
room and used as source plants for studies reported here.<br />
Virus-vector transmission relationships<br />
The SuLCV isolate collected from naturally infected<br />
plants at MRS, Raichur genotype KBSH 41 was maintained<br />
on sunflower. The whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) colonies was<br />
maintained on cotton and cucumber plants were used for virus<br />
transmission studies to determine the number of Bemisia<br />
tabaci required for the successful transmission of SuLCV,<br />
non-viruliferous B. tabaci were given an AAP of 24 h on<br />
SuLCV-infected susceptible sunflower hybrid. Viruliferous<br />
whiteflies were then transferred to 8-10 days old young healthy<br />
sunflower seedlings at the rate of 1, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 insects<br />
per seedling separately and 10 plants were inoculated in each<br />
treatment. After an IAP of 24-h, whiteflies were killed by<br />
spraying 0.03 % Imidachloprid. The plants were kept in insectproof<br />
cages in glasshouse for symptom expression and per<br />
cent transmission was recorded.<br />
Screening of different hosts against Sunflower leaf curl<br />
virus<br />
Eight crop plant species and four weeds were tested for<br />
their susceptibility to SuLCV. Healthy seedlings of different<br />
species of cultivated plants and weeds were raised in small<br />
plastic bags (5-10 cm) containing soil and compost in insect<br />
proof glasshouse and seedlings were inoculated with 10<br />
whiteflies after 24 h acquisition access feeding on SuLCV<br />
infected plant. The viruliferous whiteflies were fed on healthy
VANITHA et al., Survey, vector relationships and host range studies of tomato leaf curl Karnataka virus 37<br />
test seedlings for 24 h in insect proof inoculation tubes, after<br />
inoculation viruliferous whiteflies were killed by using 0.05%<br />
Confidor (systemic insecticide) and maintained in an insect<br />
proof cage for 2 months for symptom development.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Disease incidence, virus transmission characters and host<br />
range studies of sunflower leaf curl disease<br />
Sunflower leaf curl disease incidence was more severe<br />
at Main Agricultural Research Station trails, Raichur with<br />
incidence of 58.20%. The disease incidence ranged from 0.00%<br />
to 58.20% and varied with hybrids and varieties. The disease<br />
incidence varied from mild (10%) at Murdi village to moderate<br />
level (25%) in Narasapur village of Kustagi Taluk and to the<br />
tune of 12.50% in Kanakagiri village and 16.00% in<br />
Somanakoppa village of Gangavathi Taluk. In Yelburga Taluk,<br />
Mangaluru village, the disease was recorded to extent of<br />
25.00% while it was up to 15.50% in Beur village. In Koppal<br />
Taluk, the disease incidence of 8.00% was noticed in<br />
Gundlanur village, Betagere village (10.50%) and 20.00% in<br />
Katarki village. The disease was not noticed in Tumkur,<br />
Chitradurga, Kolar, Chikkaballapur and Bengaluru districts of<br />
Karnataka, India (Table 1).<br />
The differences in the incidence of disease in areas<br />
surveyed might be due to the variation in the source of<br />
inoculum, vector population, climatic conditions and the area<br />
under the crop. In recent years there has been wide spread<br />
occurrence of begomoviruses on many crop plants<br />
(Rajeshwari, et al., 2005). The B biotype B. tabaci reported<br />
during 2000 appears to have spread to other parts of the state.<br />
To ascertain the minimum number of B. tabaci required<br />
for efficient transmission, different groups of whiteflies (e.g.,<br />
1, 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20) per plant were used for virus inoculation.<br />
Viruliferous whiteflies were enclosed on test plants with AAP<br />
and IAP of 24-h each. Single whitefly was able to transmit<br />
SuLCV with 10.00 per cent efficiency. The transmission<br />
efficiency increased to 30% when three whiteflies were caged<br />
on healthy sunflower seedlings. Transmission efficiency was<br />
Fig. 1.<br />
Determination of number of whiteflies (B. tabaci)<br />
required for transmission of Sunflower leaf curl virus.<br />
Table 1.<br />
Sl.<br />
No.<br />
Incidence of Sunflower leaf curl disease in Karnataka<br />
District Taluk Location Hybrid<br />
No. of plants<br />
infected/number of<br />
plants examined<br />
Disease incidence<br />
(%) (Average)<br />
Symptoms<br />
1. Raichur<br />
Vt- Vein thickening, En-<br />
Raichur MARS, Raichur KBSH 41 71/122 58.20 Enation, UCu- Upward<br />
curling, St-stunting<br />
Lingasugur Pamanakallur KBSH 41 11/110 10.00 ”<br />
Gangavathi<br />
Kanakagiri KBSH 41 6/49 12.50 ”<br />
Somanakoppa KBSH 44 15/108 16.00 ”<br />
Kustagi<br />
Narasapur KBSH 41 31/124 25.00 ”<br />
Murdi KBSH 41 9/90 10.00 ”<br />
2. Koppal<br />
Mangaluru KBSH 44 27/108 25.00 ”<br />
Yellaburga<br />
Beur KBSH 41 13/84 15.50 ”<br />
Gundlanur KBSH 41 8/100 8.00 ”<br />
Koppal Katarki KBSH 41 12/60 20.00 ”<br />
Betagere KBSH 41 13/120 10.50 ”<br />
3. Tumkur Sira<br />
Thagarigunte KBSH 44 0/123 0.00 No symptoms<br />
Malangi KBSH 44 0/131 0.00 ”<br />
4. Chitradurga Hiriyur Hiriyur KBSH 44 0/86 0.00<br />
5. Kolar Srinivaspur Srinivaspur KBSH 44 0/120 0.00<br />
6. Chikkaballapur Chikkaballapur Bagepalli KBSH 44 0/98 0.00<br />
Vishwanathapura KBSH 44 0/114 0.00 ”<br />
7. Bengaluru rural Devanahalli<br />
Budigere KBSH 44 0/98 0.00 ”<br />
Chikkahalli KBSH 41 0/109 0.00 ”<br />
Battaramarenahalli KBSH 41 0/139 0.00 ”<br />
8. Bengaluru urban Bengaluru urban UAS, GKVK. KBSH 41 0/142 0.00 ”<br />
Note: Vt-vein thickening, UCu-upward curling, En- enation on lower surface of leaves, RL-reduction in leaf size, Ab-abscission of flower, St-stunting<br />
of plant
38 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
Tabl e 2. Screeni ng of hosts of Begomovirus against Sunflower leaf curl virus<br />
Sl.<br />
No.<br />
Name of the plant species<br />
Family<br />
No. of plants<br />
infected /<br />
No. of plants<br />
inoculated<br />
Transmission<br />
(%)<br />
Incubation<br />
period<br />
(days)<br />
Symptoms<br />
observed<br />
1 Tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) Solanaceae 6/10 60.00 22 DCu, RL, St<br />
2 Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) Solanaceae 7/10 70.00 21 DCu, Bl, RL, St<br />
3 Zinnia (Zinnia elegans, L.) Asteraceae 6/10 60.00 16 UCu, RL, St<br />
4 Acanthospermum hispidum Asteraceae 5/10 50.00 23 DCu, RL<br />
5 Parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus) Asteraceae 2/10 20.00 28 DCu, RL, St<br />
6 Euphorbia (Euphorbia geniculata L.) Euphorbiaceae 0/10 0.00 ____ ”<br />
7 Cotton (Gossypium hirusutum.) Malvaceae 0/10 0.00 ____ ”<br />
8 Cucumber (Cucumis sativus) Cucurbitaceae 0/10 0.00 ____ ”<br />
9 Cassia (Cassia sp.) Fabaceae 0/10 0.00 ____ ”<br />
10 Bhendi (Abelmoschus esculentus) Malvaceae 0/10 0.00 ____ ”<br />
11 Pumpkin (Cucurbita sp.) Cucurbitaceae 0/10 0.00 ____ ”<br />
12 Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) Fabaceae 0/10 0.00 ____ ”<br />
Note: Bl: blistering; UCu: upward curling; DCu: downward curling; Vt: Vein thickening; RL: reduction of leaf size; SI: shortening of internodes;<br />
St: stunting<br />
100% with 20 whiteflies per plant. This indicates that the<br />
number of insects and the transmission efficiency was<br />
positively correlated (Fig.1). Low transmissibility of Indian<br />
Cassava Mosaic Virus (ICMV) associated with woody plant<br />
species like cassava was reported to be only 18.7% with 50<br />
whiteflies per plant respectively (Mathew, 1988).<br />
In order to identify the natural hosts and weeds, the<br />
virus was inoculated to different plant species through<br />
whitefly (Table 2). Of the 12 plant species inoculated through<br />
whiteflies, successful transmission of virus was obtained only<br />
with Nicotiana benthamiana (Fig. 2a), Lycopersicon<br />
esculentum (Fig. 2b), Zinnia elegans (Fig. 2c),<br />
Acanthospermum hispidum (Fig. 2d), and Parthenium<br />
hysterophorus (Fig. 2e), The common symptoms observed<br />
on host plants are leaf curling, reduction in the leaf size and<br />
stunting of plants. Euphorbia geniculata, Gossypium<br />
barbadense, Cassia sp., Cucumis sativus, Abelmoschus<br />
esculentus, Cucurbita moschata and Phaseolus vulgaris did<br />
not show any visible symptoms.<br />
Host range studies revealed that the virus was limited<br />
to the only few plant species belonging to Solanaceae and<br />
Asteraceae. Out of 12 plant species inoculated, two plant<br />
species belonging to Solanaceae viz., N. tabacum, L.<br />
esculentum were infected with SuLCV. Three plant species,<br />
Zinnia elegans, Acanthospermum hispidum and Parthenium<br />
hysterophorus belonging to Asteraceae were infected with<br />
SuLCV through whiteflies and expressed the systemic<br />
symptoms within 30 days. Begomovirus specific primers<br />
(Deng, et al., 1994) were used to confirm infection by SuLCV<br />
in Nicotiana benthamiana, Lycopersicon esculentum, Zinnia<br />
elegans, Acanthospermum hispidum and Parthenium<br />
hysterophorus by amplifying ~530 bp of core region of CP<br />
gene. These primers used elsewhere, successfully detected<br />
Croton leaf curl virus (CrLCuV) (Mahesh, et al., 2010), Cotton<br />
leaf curl Multan virus-Hibiscus [Bangalore]<br />
(CLCuMVHib[Ban]) (Rajeshwari, et al., 2005), ( Zinnia leaf<br />
curl virus (ZLCV) (Shivakumar, 2010) and Jatropha Mosaic<br />
Virus (Rangaswamy, et al., 2005; Aswathanarayana, et al.,<br />
2007).<br />
Fig. 2. (a-e). Screening of hosts of Begomovirus against Sunflower leaf<br />
curl virus
VANITHA et al., Survey, vector relationships and host range studies of tomato leaf curl Karnataka virus 39<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Aswathanarayana, D.S., Rangaswamy, K.T., Shankarappa, K.S., Maruthi,<br />
M.N., Lakshminarayana Reddy, C.N., Rekha, A.R. and Keshava<br />
Murthy, K.V. 2007. Distinct begomoviruses closely related to cassava<br />
mosaic viruses cause Jatropha mosaic disease in India. International<br />
Journal of Virology, 3(1): 1-11.<br />
Deng, A., Mc Grath, P.F., Robinson, D.J. and Harrison, B.D. 1994.<br />
Detection and differentiation of whitefly-transmitted geminiviruses<br />
in plants and vector insects by the polymerase chain reaction with<br />
degenerate primers. Annals of Applied Biology, 125: 327-336.<br />
Govindappa, M.R., Shankergoud, I. and Shankarappa, K.S.,<br />
Wickramaarachchi, W.A.R.T., Anjeneya Reddy, B. and<br />
Rangaswamy, K.T. 2011. Molecular detection and partial<br />
characterization of begomovirus associated with leaf curl disease of<br />
sunflower (Helianthus annuus) in Southern India. Plant Patholology<br />
Journal, 10: 29-35.<br />
Mahesh, Y.S., Shankarappa, K.S., Rangaswamy, K.T., Pramella, H.A.,<br />
Aswathanarayana, D.S., Divya, B.L., Nagesha, N., Maruthi, M.N.<br />
2010. Detection and characterization of a begomovirus associated<br />
with leaf curl disease of ornamental croton (Codiaeum variegatum).<br />
Journal of Horticultural Sciences and Biotechnology, 85:101-105.<br />
Mathew, A.V. 1988. Studies on Indian Cassava Mosaic Virus disease.<br />
Ph.D. Thesis. University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore,<br />
Karnataka, India.<br />
Rajeshwari, R., Reddy, R.V.C., Maruthi, M.N., Colvin, J., Seal, S.E. and<br />
Muniyappa, V. 2005. Host range, vector relationships and sequence<br />
comparison of a begomovirus infecting hibiscus in India. Annals of<br />
Applied Biology, 147: 15-25.<br />
Rangaswamy, K.T., Raghavendra, N., Shankarappa, K.S.,<br />
Aswathanarayana, D.S., Prameela, H.A., Govindappa, M.R., Gururaj<br />
Rao, M.R. 2005. Natural occurrence of a mosaic virus disease on<br />
Jatropha. In: Nat. Sympo. Crop Disease Management in Dry Land<br />
Agriculture, 57th IPS, New Delhi annual meeting, Parbhani; 12-<br />
14th January. pp.156.<br />
Shivakumar. 2010. Studies on Zinnia leaf curl virus disease. M.Sc. (Agri.)<br />
Thesis. University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India.<br />
Stanley, J. 1983. Infectivity of the cloned geminivirus genome requires<br />
sequences from both DNAs. Nature, 305: 643-645.<br />
Recieved on 04-01-<strong>2013</strong> Accepted on 09-02-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 40-42, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Losses Caused Due to Alternaria Blight Disease in the Grain Yield of Pigeonpea<br />
LAXMAN PRASAD BALAI 1 AND R.B. S<strong>IN</strong>GH<br />
Department of Mycology and Plant Pathology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University<br />
(BHU), Varanasi 221 005, India<br />
e-mail: laxmanbhu08@gmail.com 1<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
A field trial was conducted during 2010-11 and 2011-12 to<br />
ascertain the losses caused by alternaria blight disease in the<br />
grain yield of pigeonpea. A susceptible variety ‘Bahar’ was sown<br />
in the research field. The artificial inoculations of mass culture<br />
of Alternaria tenuissima (Kunze ex pers.) Wiltshire was done in<br />
the inoculated plots at 60 DAS to create the desirable level of<br />
disease pressure of alternaria blight. The uninoculated plots<br />
(control) were sprayed with Mancozeb 75 WP (0.25%) to check<br />
the alternaria blight disease. It revealed that inoculated plots<br />
showed maximum disease intensity (44.19%) was recorded in<br />
plots which did not receive any spray of Mancozeb. In plots<br />
with one, two three and four sprays of Mancozeb, disease<br />
intensity was recorded as 31.01, 20.57, 13.75 and 11.88% and<br />
the mean % disease control was 29.88, 53.45, 68.88 and 73.09%<br />
respectively. Almost similar trend of disease intensity, crop<br />
yield and number of 100 grain seed weight was recorded in<br />
different treatments with Mancozeb.<br />
Key word<br />
Pigeonpea, alternaria blight, losses and disease<br />
intensity<br />
Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] is one of the<br />
important food legume crops and rank second after chickpea<br />
in area, production and productivity of the tropics and subtropics.<br />
The crop suffers from many fungal diseases, of which<br />
foliar diseases take a heavy toll. Assessment of the effect of<br />
any disease on yield of a crop is pre-requisite for preparing<br />
rational disease management programme. Among the diseases,<br />
alternaria blight disease has been reported to cause yield<br />
losses between 20-80% (Sharma, et al., 2012, Kushwaha, et<br />
al., 2010). Alternaria blight (Alternaria tenuissima (Kunze ex<br />
pers.) Wiltshire) was reported for the first time from Varanasi,<br />
India by Pavgi and Singh, 1971. Later, Kannainyan and Nene,<br />
1977 reported its occurrences from Hyderabad as a disease of<br />
minor importance but recently alternaria blight has become<br />
one of the serious fungal diseases of pigeonpea, especially in<br />
September sown crop. This disease has thus become the most<br />
limiting factor for rabi cultivation of pigeonpea in eastern<br />
Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Bengal. The disease symptoms start<br />
appearing as circular, chlorotic, dark brown minute spots with<br />
yellow halo on the upper surface of leaf lets, followed by<br />
development of black spots which increase in size showing<br />
purple margin around the black necrotic spots. The spots<br />
enlarge and coalesce with each other forming big lesions.<br />
These symptoms appeared in the second or third weeks of<br />
November and attain maximum disease severity at the second<br />
or third weeks of January onward. Reliable estimates of loss<br />
facilitate the objective identification of the relative importance<br />
of biotic pests. Consequently, limited resources can be<br />
assigned on a priority basis and optimize returns from a given<br />
effort. Accurate information concerning losses is also needed<br />
by growers and plant protection specialists to develop<br />
decision thresholds for determining, when cost effective<br />
control measures should be deployed (Nutter, 1993). The need<br />
for reliable crop loss assessment methodology (to develop<br />
reliable decision aids) assumes added importance given, the<br />
current worldwide concern about improving or maintaining<br />
environmental quality by reducing the use of pesticides (Stern,<br />
et al., 1959). Keeping in view the above facts, the present<br />
investigation was undertaken the estimation of yield losses<br />
in pigeonpea production under agro-climatic conditions.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
An experiment was conducted during the years 2010-11<br />
and 2011-12 at the Entomological Research Trials Field,<br />
Banaras Hindu University (BHU),Varanasi in the crop season<br />
under artificial inoculation condition to find out the extent of<br />
grain yield loss due to Alternaria blight. Susceptible cultivar<br />
(Bahar) was used in randomized block design with three<br />
replications. The plot size was 4.50 3.0 m with row spacing<br />
of 45 cm and plant to plant distance of 20 cm. Seeds were<br />
sown in second week of September. Weeds were controlled<br />
by using Glyphosate @ 3 liter/ ha pre-emergence application<br />
15 days before sowing. Optimum moisture in the soil for proper<br />
seed germination was maintained by rolling the field with a<br />
roller. Endosulphan one liter/ha was sprayed twice to prevent<br />
crop damage by different insects. After attaining the age of<br />
two months, the plants were artificial inoculated with spore<br />
cum-mycelial suspension of the pathogen and the plots were<br />
irrigated from time to time to maintain proper moisture. One,<br />
two, three and four sprays of Mancozeb 75 WP (0.25%) were<br />
applied separately in each plot. The first spray of fungicide in<br />
recommended dose was given 48 hrs after inoculation and<br />
subsequent sprays were done at 10 days interval. Check plot<br />
was sprayed with sterilized water only. Observations on<br />
disease intensity were recorded on the basis of percent of leaf<br />
area affected after 15 days of last spray and disease intensity<br />
recorded using 0-5 scale (Mayee and Datar, 1986) following<br />
Table 1.<br />
Data on the per cent infection of the disease were also<br />
converted into angular values and analyzed statistically. Grain<br />
yield (kg/ha), 100 seed grain weight (g) per plot and per cent<br />
disease control was recorded after harvest of the crop. Finally
Table 1.<br />
BALAI AND S<strong>IN</strong>GH, Losses Caused due to Alternaria Blight Disease in the Grain Yield of Pigeonpea 41<br />
Disease intensity recorded using 0-5 scale<br />
Scale Description Degree of resistant<br />
0 No Disease High resistant<br />
1 0.1-5.0% Resistant<br />
2 5.1-10% Moderent resistant<br />
3 10.1-25.0% Moderent susceptible<br />
4 25.1-50.0% Susceptible<br />
5 50 % and above High susceptible<br />
Table 2.<br />
grain yield loss was calculated using following formula.<br />
Yieldin treatment Yieldin check<br />
Per cent yield loss = 100<br />
Yield in treatment<br />
a) Per cent disease intensity (PDI): Per cent disease<br />
intensity was calculated by using following formula<br />
(Mayee and Datar, 1986).<br />
Sum of individual rating scale<br />
Per cent disease intensity = —––––––——————— × 100<br />
No. of disease plant observation × Maxi. Dis. Rating<br />
b) Yield: Crop was harvested at maturing stage and yield<br />
of net plot was recorded (kg/ha) and expressed in q/ha.<br />
c) Per cent reduction over control<br />
Disease severity in control – Disease severity in treatment<br />
Disease reduction (%) = ––––––––––––––––––––––– × 100<br />
Disease severity in control<br />
Yield in treatment plot - Yield in control plot<br />
Yield increase (%) = –––––––––––––––––––––––––– × 100<br />
Table 3.<br />
Spray schedule.<br />
Sl. No. Treatment Spray schedule<br />
1 T 1 One spray at the onset of the disease<br />
2 T 2 Two sprays, at T 1 + 10 days after T 1<br />
3 T 3 Three sprays, at T 1 + T 2 +10 days after T 2<br />
4 T 4 Four sprays, at T 1+T 2+T 3+10 days after T 3<br />
5 T 5 No spray (control)<br />
Yield in control plot<br />
Estimation of yield losses in Alternaria blight affected pigeonpea<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The data presented in the Table 3 clearly shows that<br />
increased in number of sprays of Mancozeb (1-4) significantly<br />
decreased the disease intensity of alternaria blight. Disease<br />
intensity recorded in 2010-11 crops season was 30.01, 20.02,<br />
14.01 and 12.44% at 1, 2, 3 and 4 spray of Mancozeb,<br />
respectively. Whereas, in crop season 2011-12 disease<br />
intensity was recorded 32.01, 21.12, 13.50 and 11.32%. It<br />
revealed that inoculated plots had maximum disease intensity<br />
43.88 and 44.50% were recorded in 2010-11 and 2011-12,<br />
respectively in control plots which did not receive any spray<br />
of Mancozeb. Foliar sprays of Mancozeb significantly reduced<br />
the disease intensity over control the maximum reduction<br />
being plots with 4 sprays. Number of spraying significantly<br />
increased the grain yield (gram/plot).<br />
Minimum yield (1503.60 and 1496.40g/plot) was recorded<br />
in control plots which did not receive any spray of Mancozeb.<br />
One, two, three and four sprays of Mancozeb yield recorded<br />
(1677.00, 1776.60, 1869.00 and 19.50g/plots) 2010-11, whereas<br />
crop season 2011-12 (1667.90, 1776.60, 1855.00 and 1945.90g/<br />
plots) were recorded and disease control of 31.51, 54.31, 68.03<br />
and 71.61% respectively, during the year 2010-11.Whereas,<br />
disease control recorded in 2011-12 was 28.07, 52.54, 69.66<br />
and 74.56%. Over all maximum and minimum disease intensity<br />
(44.19 and 11.88%), grain yield (1948.08 and 1500.00g/plot)<br />
and disease control (73.09 and 29.79%) were recorded during<br />
this crop season.<br />
Four sprays of Mancozeb consistently gave maximum<br />
disease control in both the year crop seasons. Hence, it could<br />
be concluded that crop protection with fungicide is essential<br />
in pigeonpea to minimize the reduction in the yields caused<br />
due to alternaria blight disease. This corroborates the findings<br />
of Carson, 1985 that alternaria blight caused yield losses up<br />
to 51 to 60%, when seed yields were compared to those of<br />
check plots sprayed with fungicide. The 100-seed weight was<br />
also significantly reduced in treatments. Yield losses and<br />
Treatment<br />
Disease intensity Grain yield/plot (g) Test wt (100 seed) Per cent disease control<br />
2010-11 2011-12 Mean 2010-11 2011-12 Mean 2010-11 2011-12 Mean 2010-11 2011-12 Mean<br />
T 1 43.88 44.50 44.19 1503.60 1496.40 1500.00 8.92 8.88 8.9 0 0 0<br />
(41.50)* (41.86) (41.68)<br />
T 2 30.01 32.01 31.01 1677.00 1667.90 1672.45 9.30 9.26 9.28 31.51 28.07 29.79<br />
(33.21) (34.44) (33.83)<br />
T 3 20.02 21.12 20.57 1776.60 1776.60 1776.60 9.80 9.76 9.78 54.31 52.54 53.43<br />
(26.71) (27.36) (27.04)<br />
T 4 14.01 13.50 13.75 1869.00 1855.00 1862.00 9.96 9.98 9.97 68.03 69.66 68.85<br />
(21.97) (21.57) (21.77)<br />
T 5 12.44 11.32 11.88 1950.25 1945.90 1948.08 10.50 10.60 10.55 71.61 74.56 73.09<br />
(20.64) (19.63) (20.14)<br />
Sem± 0.50 0.34 16.22 15.34 0.10 0.11 - - -<br />
C.D. (0.05) 1.46 1.00 47.47 44.87 0.31 0.32 - - -<br />
*Values in parentheses are angular transformed values, where as, T 1<br />
= Control, T 2<br />
= One spray Indofil M-45 (mancozeb), T 3<br />
= Two sprays Indofil<br />
M-45 (mancozeb), T 4<br />
= Three sprays Indofil M-45 (mancozeb), T 5<br />
= Four sprays Indofil M-45 (mancozeb)
42 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
losses in 100-seed weight were consistently greater, indicating<br />
that alternaria could be a greater problem in seed production<br />
fields. Shivankar, et al., 2000 reported that inoculated plots<br />
showed highest intensity of leaf blight disease within the<br />
range of 58.42 to 64.91% and gave significant reduction in the<br />
yields in the range of 19.95 to 39.32% along with also reduction<br />
in 100 grain weight i.e., 6.80 to 17.08% as compared to uninoculated<br />
plots. Assessment of the effect of any disease on<br />
yield of a crop is pre-requisite for preparing rational disease<br />
management programme. Among the diseases, alternaria blight<br />
disease caused the yield losses up 20-80% (Sharma, et al.,<br />
2012). The crop suffers greatly from alternaria blight and the<br />
pathogen may cause 40-50% reduction in yield, in most<br />
pigeonpea growing states of India (Kushwaha, et al., 2010).<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />
Authors are grateful to Head, Department of Mycology<br />
and Plant Pathology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences,<br />
Banaras Hindu University (BHU), Varanasi for providing<br />
necessary facilities during the course of investigation.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Carson, M. L. 1985. Epidemiology and yield losses associated with<br />
alternaria blight of sunflower. Phytopathology. 75:1151-1156.<br />
Kannaiyan, J. and Nene, Y. L. 1977. Alternaria leaf spot of pigeonpea.<br />
Tropical Grain Legume Bulletin. 9: 34.<br />
Kushwaha, A., Srivastava, A., Nigam, R. and Srivastava, N. 2010.<br />
Management of alternaria blight of pigeonpea crop through<br />
chemicals. International Journal of Plant Protection. 3:313-315.<br />
Mayee, C.D. and Datar, V.V. 1986. Phytopathometry. Department of<br />
Plant Pathology, Marathwada agricultural University, Parbhani,<br />
Technical bulletin No. 3, pp. 110.<br />
Nutter, F.W. 1993. Terms and concepts for yield, crop loss and disease<br />
thresholds. Plant Disease, 77: 211-215.<br />
Pavgi, M.S. and Singh, R.A. 1971. Parasitic fungi from north India,<br />
VIII. Mycopath. et Myco. Appl. 43:117-125.<br />
Sharma, M., Ghosh, R., Mangla, N., Saxena, K. B. and Pande, S. 2012.<br />
Alternaria tenuissima causing alternaria blight on Pigeonpea<br />
[Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] in India. Plant Disease, 96: 907.2-<br />
907.296.<br />
Shivankar, S.K., Shivankar, R.S. and Nagone, A.H. 2000. Losses caused<br />
due to leaf blight disease in the grain yield of irrigated Wheat.<br />
Agricultural Science Digest, 20: 203-204.<br />
Stern, V.M., Smith, R.F., Van den bosch, R. and Hagan, K. S. 1959. The<br />
integrated control concepts. Hilgardia, 9: 81-101.<br />
Recieved on 14-12-2012 Accepted on 13-01-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 43-45, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Relative Performance of Resource Conservation Technologies in Maize Based<br />
Cropping System Under Temperate Kashmir<br />
FAYAZ AHMED BAHAR<br />
Department of Agronomy, FOA & RRS, Wadura, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and<br />
Technology Kashmir 193 201<br />
e-mail: bharfayaz@redifmail.com<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
A field experiment was conducted during kharif, 2008-09 and<br />
2009-10 at the Experimental Farm of the Regional Research<br />
Station and Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Kashmir University<br />
of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir to study<br />
the relative performance of resource conservation technologies<br />
in maize based cropping system. Four different tillage methods<br />
viz; conventional tillage, minimum tillage, zero tillage and<br />
bed planting were used in the main plots alongwith two sub<br />
plot treatments viz; no mulch and straw mulch. Based on the<br />
findings of experimentations, higher yield attributes and grain<br />
yield of maize were obtained in conventional tillage which was<br />
at par to bed planting. Similar trend was observed in the<br />
succeeding crops of maize based cropping system during both<br />
the years. The yield under conventional tillage was about 19.6%<br />
higher than zero tillage. Zero tillage and minimum tillage<br />
were found at par. Mulching with paddy straw significantly<br />
increased the grain yield of maize by about 14.4%. Significantly<br />
lowest total weed density and dry matter accumulation were<br />
recorded in conventional tillage than minimum and zero tillage.<br />
Conventional tillage recorded the lowest depletion of nutrients<br />
in weeds and minimum B:C ratio among tillage practices. Straw<br />
mulch recorded the significantly highest net returns and B:C<br />
ratio than the no mulch treatment.<br />
Key words<br />
Cropping system, maize, tillage, conservation<br />
technologies<br />
In Jammu and Kashmir State, the total area under maize<br />
crop is 0.33 m ha with a production of 0.525 m t (Sharma, 2004)<br />
and is cultivated mostly by the tribal people on rainfed areas<br />
and karewas. The production of this crop is low in Jammu<br />
and Kashmir State as compared to the rice and wheat. Maize<br />
crop has a good potential under Kashmir conditions but is<br />
facing some of the major constraints. Inadequate land<br />
preparation coupled with over exploitation of resources often<br />
leads to soil deterioration and thus poor crop stand and<br />
productivity. Therefore, it becomes imperative to sustain the<br />
productivity of maize based cropping system through<br />
alternative and efficient technologies which are less labour<br />
intensive, makes best utilization of the residual moisture and<br />
enable the farmers to produce more with less cost of<br />
cultivation. This can be accomplished by making the<br />
comparative studies on different tillage methods. Beneficial<br />
effects of tillage and mulching on crop productivity are<br />
reported (Sharma, et al; 2009) but the information on these<br />
aspects under rainfed valley conditions is meager.<br />
Management of weeds through integration of tillage methods<br />
and mulching can increase the uptake of nutrients and<br />
productivity of the crop by decreasing the biomass and<br />
nutrient removal by the weeds. Unchecked weed growth in<br />
this crop may result in grain yield loss to the extent of 100%<br />
(Sharma, 2005). Keeping in view the above facts the present<br />
investigation was undertaken to study the relative performance<br />
of resource conservation technologies in maize based cropping<br />
system.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
A field experiment was conducted during 2008-09 and<br />
2009-10 at Experimental Farm of the Regional Research Station<br />
and Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Kashmir University of<br />
Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir to study<br />
the relative performance of resource conservation<br />
technologies in maize based cropping system. The<br />
experimental soil was well-drained, silty clay-loam in texture<br />
and had pH of 7.4, organic carbon 0.75%, available N 292 kg/<br />
ha, available P 22.4 kg/ha and available K 107.7 kg/ha. The<br />
experiment consisted of four different tillage methods viz;<br />
conventional tillage (CT), minimum tillage (MT), zero tillage<br />
(ZT) and bed planting (BP) in the main plots and two sub plot<br />
treatments viz; no mulch (NM) and straw mulch (SM) laid out<br />
in split plot design (SPD) with three replications. Spacing of<br />
60cm x 20cm was maintained in maize by thinning and gap<br />
filling and the subsequent crops were grown as per the<br />
recommended package of practices. Weed count (No./m 2 ),<br />
weed dry matter accumulation (g/m 2 ) and nutrient uptake of<br />
weeds and crop were recorded at 60 days stage. Data on weed<br />
count and weed dry matter accumulation was subjected to<br />
square root transformation. The nutrient uptake by weeds<br />
and crop was calculated by multiplying the content of each<br />
nutrient with dry matter of weeds and crop respectively.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Grain yield<br />
Significantly taller plants were observed in conventional<br />
tillage and bed planting than minimum tillage and zero tillage<br />
methods among tillage practices whereas straw mulch recorded<br />
significantly taller plants than no-mulch treatment.<br />
Conventional tillage and bed planting, being statistically at<br />
par with each other produced significantly higher yield<br />
contributing characters (viz; cob length, cob girth, number of
44 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
cobs/plant, grains/cob and 1000 grain weight) and grain yield<br />
of maize than minimum tillage and zero tillage. Grain yield with<br />
minimum tillage was at par with zero tillage. Conventional<br />
tillage recorded the highest maize grain yield of 34.01q/ha<br />
whereas it was lowest with zero tillage (28.42 q/ha) thereby<br />
indicating an increased grain yield of 19.6% over zero tillage.<br />
Similar trend was observed in the succeeding crops of maize<br />
based cropping system (Table 1). This was due to the improved<br />
physico-chemical condition of the soil which favourably<br />
increased the uptake of nutrients by the crop and also reduced<br />
the state of crop weed competition by lowering the total weed<br />
population and weed dry matter accumulation, leading to<br />
increase in values of yield contributing characters. Similar<br />
findings have been reported by Chopra and Angiras, 2008.<br />
Zero tillage and minimum tillage were at par with respect to<br />
the average grain yield of crops in maize based cropping<br />
system. Mulching with paddy straw significantly increased<br />
the grain yield of maize by about 14.4%. The residual effect of<br />
the kharif tillages and mulching was nonsignificant on the<br />
grain yield of succeeding rabi crops. However the highest<br />
grain yield of the succeeding crops was recorded with<br />
conventional tillage which was statistically at par with bed<br />
planting followed by minimum tillage and zero tillage<br />
respectively. These findings are in lines with the findings of<br />
Sharma, et al., 2009. Mulching application significantly<br />
increased the yield of crops. This was due to decrease in the<br />
evaporation and improved physico-chemical properties of soil,<br />
availability of adequate soil moisture for longer period and<br />
effective weed control than un-mulched treatment besides<br />
shifting of nutrients towards the crop. Uncontrolled water<br />
supply through the conservation of moisture and regulation<br />
of soil temperature which in turn increased maize yield and<br />
yield of crops in maize based cropping system (Ondal, et al.,<br />
2008). Inadequate moisture supply under no mulching resulted<br />
in low grain yield which was due to deleterious effect on most<br />
of the physiological process of the crop.<br />
Weed growth<br />
The predominant weeds which have been observed in<br />
the experimental field were grouped in to (i) broad leaved<br />
weeds viz; Amaranthus spp. (32.08%), Chenopodium album<br />
(20.37%), Convolvulus arvensis (11.84%) (ii) narrow leaved<br />
weeds viz; Sorghum halepense (10.54%), Poa spp. (5.6%),<br />
Cynodon dactylon (6.4%), Lolium spp.(5.5%) and (iii) Cyperus<br />
Table 1.<br />
Table 2.<br />
Effect of tillage and mulching on grain yield of maize, wheat, lentil and brown sarson (mean yield of two years).<br />
Treatment<br />
Maize yield (qha -1 ) Wheat yield (qha -1 ) Lentil yield (qha -1 ) Brown sarson (qha -1 )<br />
2008 2009 Mean 08-09 09-010 Mean 08-09 09-010 Mean 08-09 09-010 Mean<br />
Tillage<br />
Conventional tillage 33.50 33.6 34.01 30.00 29.25 29.62 6.90 6.73 6.81 12.25 11.88 12.06<br />
Minimum tillage 29.80 29.95 29.87 26.35 26.69 26.52 6.05 5.90 5.97 9.80 9.51 9.65<br />
Zero tillage 28.35 28.50 28.42 24.75 24.13 24.44 5.69 5.55 5.62 9.61 9.33 9.47<br />
Bed planting 32.85 32.95 32.9 32.75 31.93 32.34 7.40 7.22 7.31 13.00 12.60 12.80<br />
C. D.(P=0.05) 2.69 2.71 2.7 2.39 2.33 02.36 0.56 0.55 0.55 0.95 0.92 0.93<br />
Mulching<br />
No mulch 29.08 29.15 29.11 27.78 27.09 27.43 5.92 5.77 5.84 10.70 10.38 10.54<br />
Straw mulch 33.18 33.35 33.26 29.15 28.42 28.78 7.10 6.93 7.01 11.63 11.28 11.45<br />
C. D.(P=0.05) 3.41 3.42 3.41 NS NS NS 0.72 0.70 0.71 NS NS NS<br />
Effect of tillage and mulching on yield attributing characters, weed growth and nutrient uptake (kg/ha) by weeds in<br />
maize (mean of two years)<br />
Treatment Plant height Cob length Cob girth No. of cobs Grains 1000 grain TWD* TWDMA # Nutrient uptake<br />
(cm) (cm) (cm) plant -1 cob -1 weight (No./m 2 ) (g/m 2 ) N P K<br />
Tillage<br />
Conventional tillage 152.9 15.8 4.3 1.15 330 265.7 14.7 9.8 17.76 3.98 19.10<br />
**(238.0) (107.3)<br />
Minimum tillage 139.8 12.5 3.9 1.14 307 224.4 16.1 11.1 22.7 4.98 24.3<br />
(270.0) (131.3)<br />
Zero tillage 136.0 12.3 3.8 1.10 299 238.6 16.5 11.4 24.81 5.72 26.9<br />
(283.3) (139.4)<br />
Bed planting 150.6 15.7 4.1 1.14 322 264.3 15.3 10.2 22.1 4.83 23.99<br />
(241.0) (113.4)<br />
C. D.(P=0.05) 9.5 2.9 NS 0.06 5.6 2.4 0.5 0.3 1.92 0.40 1.32<br />
Mulching<br />
No mulch 113.4 11.2 3.4 1.10 313 218.3 16.2 10.8 40.63 11.35 45.45<br />
(260.0) (115.8)<br />
Straw mulch 141.9 14.4 3.6 1.14 327 224.4 13.1 7.8 15.09 2.97 11.98<br />
(171.1) (59.0)<br />
C. D.(P=0.05) 10.3 2.0 NS NS 4.6 2.6 0.5 0.3 1.30 0.60 2.25<br />
*TWD:- Total weed density; # TWDMA:- Total weed dry matter accumulation; **Values in parantheses are means of original values
Table 3.<br />
BAHAR, Relative Performance of Resource Conservation Technologies in Maize based Cropping System 45<br />
Effect of tillage and mulching on yield attributing characters, weed growth and nutrient uptake (kg/ha) by weeds in<br />
maize (mean of two years)<br />
Tillage / Mulching<br />
Net returns<br />
Benefit : Cost ratio<br />
2008 2009 2008 2009<br />
CT MT ZT BP Mean CT MT ZT BP Mean CT MT ZT BP Mean CT MT ZT BP Mean<br />
No mulch 5727 6667 5934 6161 6122 6356 6678 5637 5253 5981 0.64 0.94 0.84 0.80 0.81 0.70 0.92 0.8 0.7 0.78<br />
Straw mulch 7946 9839 9405 8491 8920 9893 10291 10528 10929 10410 0.8 1.16 1.21 1.02 1.05 1.02 1.26 1.28 1.23 1.19<br />
Mean 6837 8253 7670 7326 8125 8485 8083 8091 0.72 1.05 1.02 0.91 0.86 1.09 1.04 0.98<br />
C.D. T M TxM T M TxM T M TxM T M TxM<br />
(0.05) 350 280 407 548 635 0.08 0.12 0.12 0.06 0.08 0.11<br />
spp. (6.5%). Predominance of these weed species in maize<br />
crop had also been reported by Sharma, 2005.<br />
Significantly lowest total weed density and weed dry<br />
matter accumulation were recorded in the conventional tillage<br />
(Table 2) and bed planting. This was owing to delay in<br />
emergence of weeds in more number due to the presence of<br />
less moisture content in the top layer under these two tillage<br />
methods compared with zero tillage and minimum tillage<br />
practices. Zero tillage and minimum tillage were at par with<br />
respect to reduction in weed density and weed dry matter.<br />
These findings are in conformity with the findings of Chopra<br />
and Angiras, 2008. Mulching with straw recorded significant<br />
reduction in weed growth and dry matter accumulation than<br />
un-mulched treatment (Table 2). It can be attributed to vigorous<br />
crop growth and less crop weed competition in mulched plots<br />
and very low degree of crop weed competition in un-mulched<br />
plots thus creating smothering effect on weed growth.<br />
Nutrient uptake and Economics<br />
Nutrient uptake (kg/ha) is a product of nutrient content<br />
in per cent and dry matter accumulation. Conventional tillage<br />
reduced the N, P and K depletion by weeds followed by bed<br />
planting compared with zero tillage and minimum tillage (Table<br />
2). The weeds in the zero tillage and minimum tillage on an<br />
average removed 24.81, 5.72, 26.9 and 22.7, 4.98, 24.3 kg/ha N,<br />
P and K respectively. Straw mulch significantly lowered the<br />
uptake of N, P and K by weeds as compared to un-mulched<br />
plots. It can be attributed to the effective control of weeds by<br />
straw mulch and provided a competition free environment<br />
which led to increased growth of the crop and thereby increase<br />
in nutrient uptake by increasing the grain yield of maize.<br />
Minimum tillage fetched the significantly highest mean net<br />
returns of Rs. 8369 followed by zero tillage (Rs. 7877), bed<br />
planting (Rs. 7709) and conventional tillage (Rs. 7481) in<br />
decreasing order (Table 3). Similar results have been reported<br />
by Sharma, et al., 2009. The highest benefit: cost ratio of 1.05<br />
and 1.09 was observed in minimum tillage and lowest with<br />
conventional tillage (0.72 and 0.98) respectively. Straw mulch<br />
recorded the highest mean net returns (Rs. 9665) and benefit:<br />
cost ratio (1.05 and 1.19) whereas no-mulch provided the<br />
lowest net returns (Rs. 6052) and benefit: cost ratio (0.81 and<br />
0.78) respectively.<br />
Hence it can be concluded that maximum yield attributing<br />
characters and grain yield was recorded in conventional tillage<br />
alongwith reduced weed growth and nutrient uptake among<br />
tillage practices. Straw mulch recorded the significantly highest<br />
net returns and B: C ratio than the no mulch treatment.<br />
LITERATUREC CITED<br />
Chopra, P. and Angiras, N.N. 2008. Effect of tillage and weed<br />
management on productivity and nutrient uptake of maize (Zea<br />
mays). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 53(1): 66-69.<br />
Ondal, N.A.M., Ossain, S.M.A.H., Huiya, S.U.B. and Ahiruddin, M.J.<br />
2008. Productivity of rainfed mustard in relation to tillage and<br />
mulching. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research. 33: 597-<br />
606.<br />
Sharma, P., Abrol, V., Sankar, G.R.M. and Singh, B. 2009. Influence of<br />
tillage practices and mulching options on productivity, economics<br />
and soil physical properties of maize (Zea mays L.) – wheat (Triticum<br />
aestivum) system. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 79(11):<br />
865-70.<br />
Sharma, A.R. 2004. Fertilizer management in maize wheat cropping<br />
system in the western Himalayan region. Fertilizer News, 49(2):<br />
13-32.<br />
Sharma, R. 2005. Integrated weed management in kharif maize. Intensive<br />
Agriculture May-June pp. 6-9.<br />
Recieved on 13-06-2012 Accepted on 19-01-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 46-49, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Influence of Deltamethrin and Achook ® on Activities of Phosphatases in the Nervous<br />
Tissue of Zebrafish, Danio rerio<br />
DILIP KUMAR SHARMA AND BADRE ALAM ANSARI 1<br />
Zebrafish Laboratory, Department of Zoology, D.D.U. Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur 273 009, U.P. India<br />
e-mail: ba.ansari@rediffmail.com 1<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
number of medicinal properties. Azadirachtin (a<br />
A comparative study of synthetic pyrethroid, Deltamethrin and<br />
a neem based pesticide, Achook ® was performed to evaluate the<br />
effect on the activity of phosphatases in the nervous tissue<br />
(brain) of Danio rerio at different concentrations (96 h LC 5<br />
,<br />
LC 10<br />
and LC 20<br />
) and exposure periods (4, 8, 12 and 16 days).<br />
Exposure of fish to each concentration of each pesticide resulted<br />
in concentration-dependent inhibition in phosphatases<br />
activities in comparison with control group. The activity of acid<br />
phosphatase (ACP) was reduced to 44% for Deltamethrin<br />
whereas 48% of controls (100%) for Achook ® treated fishes<br />
after 16 days exposure to LC 20<br />
. After 12 days the alkaline<br />
phosphatase (ALP) activities of the LC 20<br />
of Deltamethrinexposed<br />
fish were more strongly inhibited (31%) than that of<br />
the fish exposed to Achook ® (37%). With the present study it is<br />
attributed that the natural pesticides are also deadly toxic to<br />
fishes and hence these pesticides should be used with great<br />
caution and in sustainable way to minimize the hazards in<br />
aquatic environment and to human beings.<br />
Key words<br />
Danio rerio, Deltamethrin, Achook ® , Phosphatases,<br />
Nervous tissue<br />
The main sources of water pollution are industrial waste,<br />
domestic sewage, drainage and pesticides used for food<br />
production. Aquatic contamination of the pesticides causes<br />
acute and chronic poisoning of fish and other organisms.<br />
Because of their rapid knock out properties, synthetic<br />
pyrethroids have attracted farmers and health departments to<br />
use them in pest control. Type-II pyrethroids including<br />
deltamethrin are potentially toxic to fish and least toxic to<br />
mammals (W.H.O., 1990). They are more effective than the<br />
organophosphate pesticides, replacing them in many<br />
agricultural, commercial and residential applications. All<br />
pyrethroids are potent neurotoxicant (Oros, et al., 2005) and<br />
interfere with nerve cell function by interacting with voltagedependent<br />
sodium channels as well as other ion channels,<br />
resulting in repetitive firing of neurons and eventually causing<br />
paralysis (Shafer and Meyer, 2004). Fish sensitivity to<br />
pyrethroids may be explained by their relatively slow<br />
metabolism and elimination of these compounds (David, et<br />
al., 2003). They are reported to alter the various biochemical<br />
constituents in various tissues of fish (Anita Susan, et al.,<br />
2010; Sharma and Ansari, 2011; Sharma, et al., 2012).<br />
The neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) is a tropical<br />
evergreen tree, native to Indian sub-continent which is a<br />
natural source of insecticides and agrochemicals along with a<br />
tetranotriterpenoid) is one of a major component of neem,<br />
which have pesticidal property (N.R.C., 1992). However, the<br />
disturbance in the total protein level due to different neem<br />
extracts have been reported (Winkaler, et al., 2007). These<br />
pesticides may damage the vital organs (Joshi, et al., 2007)<br />
and found toxic to embryo, fingerlings and adult of zebrafish<br />
(Ansari and Sharma, 2009; Ansari and Ansari, 2012; Sharma,<br />
et al., 2012).<br />
Enzymes are biochemical molecules that control<br />
metabolic processes of organisms, thus a slight variation in<br />
enzyme activities would affect the organism. Hence, a need<br />
was felt to investigate the changes in the activities of acid<br />
phosphatase (ACP) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in the<br />
brain of zebrafish, Danio rerio after sub-lethal exposure of<br />
synthetic pyrethroid Deltamethrin and neem based formulation<br />
Achook ® .<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
For the present experiment zebrafish were procured from<br />
our stock aquarium. Water temperature of the aquarium ranged<br />
between 25 ± 2 o C and the pH was maintained between 6.6 and<br />
8.5. In this study, commercial formulations of synthetic<br />
pyrethroid Deltamethrin available in 2.8% emulsifiable<br />
concentrate (E.C.) and neem pesticide Achook ® (0.15% E.C.)<br />
were used. Mature adult fishes were exposed to sublethal<br />
concentrations viz., 96-h LC 5<br />
, LC 10<br />
and LC 20<br />
of Deltamethrin<br />
and Achook ® for 16 days continuously as per the values<br />
calculated in earlier experiment (Sharma, et al., 2012). Fifty<br />
fishes for each concentration of the pesticides were used. In<br />
these aquaria water was replaced daily with fresh treatment of<br />
pesticides so as to maintain the constant concentration of the<br />
toxicant. Each experiment was accompanied by its respective<br />
controls. Zebrafish was used as the test species as per<br />
recommendation of the International Organization for<br />
Standardization and the Organization for Economic Cooperation<br />
and Development (O.E.C.D., 1992).<br />
After the expiry of the exposure periods (4, 8, 12 and 16<br />
days), required number of exposed fishes were taken out from<br />
experimental and control groups. Activities of ACP and ALP<br />
in the brain of zebrafish were estimated according to the method<br />
originally proposed by Andersch and Scyzpinski, 1947 later<br />
modified by Bergmeyer, 1967 using p-nitrophenylphosphate<br />
as substrate. The activities of phosphatases have been<br />
expressed as micro mole (µM) substrate hydrolyzed/30
SHARMA AND ANSARI, Influence of Deltamethrin and Achook® on Activities of Phosphatases in the Nervous Tissue 47<br />
minutes/mg protein. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was<br />
employed to test the significance of the data using StatPlus ®<br />
version 2009 computer software purchased from Analystsoft<br />
Vancouver, Canada.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The phosphatases activity in the brain tissues of control<br />
fish and the fish exposed to sublethal concentrations of the<br />
pesticides for 16 days are presented in Tables 1-4. The activity<br />
of ACP was reduced to 88% of controls (100%) in brain for<br />
Deltamethrin whereas 91% for Achook ® treated fishes at LC 5<br />
exposure for 4 days. After 8 days exposure to LC 10<br />
the ACP<br />
activities reduced to 60 and 71% in brain tissues for<br />
Deltamethrin and Achook ® treatment, respectively. Greater<br />
inhibition of the ACP activity in brain tissues was recorded<br />
with the increasing concentration of the pesticide especially<br />
after 16 days of exposure (Tables 1 and 2).<br />
After 12 days the ALP activities of the LC 20<br />
of<br />
Deltamethrin-exposed fish were more strongly inhibited (31%)<br />
than that of the fish exposed to Achook ® (37%) (Tables 3 and<br />
4). The ALP activity was reduced to 30% of controls (100%) in<br />
brain after 16 days exposure to LC 20<br />
of Deltamethrin. The<br />
reduction in ALP activity from the control was 35% in brain<br />
due to Achook ® at the same concentration and exposure period<br />
as that of Deltamethrin. There was a concentration as well as<br />
time dependent inhibition in the activities of phosphatases.<br />
All the data were statistically significant (P
48 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
Table 2.<br />
Effect of Achook on Brain ACP (µM substrate hydrolyzed/30 minutes/mg protein) in Danio rerio<br />
Treatment<br />
period<br />
(days)<br />
4<br />
8<br />
12<br />
16<br />
Control<br />
(0.00)<br />
9.05±0.41<br />
(100)<br />
9.10±0.69<br />
(100)<br />
8.82±0.39<br />
(100)<br />
9.02±0.69<br />
(100)<br />
Values represent mean ± SD (n=6); data were significant at P
Table 4.<br />
SHARMA AND ANSARI, Influence of Deltamethrin and Achook® on Activities of Phosphatases in the Nervous Tissue 49<br />
Effect of Achook on Brain ALP (µM substrate hydrolyzed/30 minutes/mg protein) in Danio rerio<br />
Treatment<br />
period<br />
(days)<br />
4<br />
8<br />
12<br />
16<br />
Control<br />
(0.00)<br />
5.29±0.44<br />
(100)<br />
5.02±0.33<br />
(100)<br />
5.15±0.60<br />
(100)<br />
4.93±0.63<br />
(100)<br />
Concentration of Achook (µg/L)<br />
LC 5<br />
LC 10<br />
(0.025)<br />
(0.17)<br />
4.56±0.61<br />
3.61±0.30<br />
(86)<br />
(68)<br />
4.23±0.08<br />
3.11±0.08<br />
(84)<br />
(62)<br />
3.90±0.07<br />
2.67±0.09<br />
(76)<br />
(52)<br />
2.88±0.09<br />
2.04±0.03<br />
(58)<br />
(41)<br />
Values represent mean ± SD (n=6); data were significant at P
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 50-53, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Herbal Rumenotoric Drugs and Their Effect on Digestion and Growth Performance<br />
of Crossbred Calves<br />
R.D. GAUTAM 1 , D.P. S<strong>IN</strong>GH, RAM NIWAS AND ABED M. ALBIAL<br />
Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University,<br />
Varanasi 221 005, India<br />
e-mail: rajdeepak.gautam@gmail.com 1<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
The aim of present study to evaluate the effect of market drug<br />
(Rumizyme) and self formulated rumenotoric drug on the growth<br />
performance, dry matter intake (DMI), digestibility coefficient<br />
and rumen pH of crossbred calves. For said purpose the<br />
investigation was carried out in the Department of Animal<br />
Husbandry and Dairying, Institute of Agricultural Sciences,<br />
Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India with Twenty seven<br />
crossbred calves weighing about 77 to 80 kg (6 to 12 months of<br />
age) were selected and divided randomly into three similar<br />
group (3 animals in each) for three different trials (1 st Trial, 2 nd<br />
Trial and 3 rd Trial) and each trial was conducted for 60 days<br />
excluding pre experimental period. All the calves were fed on<br />
seasonally available feeds and fodders to meet out the nutritional<br />
requirement as per NRC, 1989 recommendation. Group T 2<br />
and<br />
T 3<br />
were supplemented with marketed drug (one bolus/day) and<br />
self formulated rumenotoric drug (40gm/day) respectively and<br />
group T 1<br />
(control) was fed without any drug. During each trial<br />
at 15, 30, 45 & 60 days of interval the body weight, heart girth<br />
circumferences, DMI, digestibility coefficient and rumen pH<br />
were analyzed. Herbs used in the rumenotoric drugs not only<br />
improve the appetite, digestion process but also it stimulates<br />
the growth parameters and improves the immune system. There<br />
was significant increase (P
GAUTAM et al., Herbal Rumenotoric Drugs and their Effect on Digestion and Growth Performance of Crossbred Calves 51<br />
standard farm ration comprising green fodder (Bajara, Maize<br />
and Berseem etc. depending on seasonal availability) and<br />
wheat busha as the dry roughage along with a balanced<br />
concentrate mixture and mineral to meet their nutritional<br />
requirements. During the entire period possible scientific care<br />
was exercised to maintain hygienic conditions and to avoid<br />
infectious diseases in the experimental animals. These animals<br />
were dewormed using bolus of Bandy Kind Plus before<br />
initiating the experiments. During each trial at 15, 30, 45 and 60<br />
days interval the body weight gain, heart girth circumference,<br />
dry matter intake (DMI), digestibility coefficient (DC) and rumen<br />
pH were measured.<br />
In digestibility experiments attempts were made to find<br />
out the digestibility coefficient of the food as a whole or some<br />
constituents of the food. The usual calculation of the digestion<br />
coefficient (DC) by following equation:<br />
DMI (kg/head/day) = DM in feed offered – DM in feed residue<br />
DM intake (kg) - DM in faeces (kg)<br />
Digestibility Coefficient of DM (Per cent) = ———— × 100<br />
DM intake (kg)<br />
Statistical Analyses: The data were statistically analyzed<br />
using GLM procedure of SAS 1992. Duncan’s test 1955 was<br />
applied in experiment whenever to test differences. The<br />
following model was used:<br />
Where:<br />
Y = µ + Ti + P n<br />
+ TP in<br />
+ e ins<br />
Y = observed trait, ì = overall mean<br />
Ti = effect of i th treatments (i th = T 1<br />
, T 2<br />
, T 3<br />
)<br />
e = random error<br />
P n<br />
= effect of n th periods (n th = 0, 30, 60) TP in<br />
= interaction<br />
between T i<br />
and P n<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
During each trial heart girth circumference was measured<br />
in cm, while body weight and dry matter intake (DMI) in kg<br />
and digestibility coefficient (DC) in per cent and rumen pH at<br />
15, 30, 45 and 60 days of interval. The heart girth was found<br />
best in T 3<br />
followed by T2 and lowest in T1 (Control) groups in<br />
all three trials; showed a significant difference (P
Table 2.<br />
Group<br />
Control Group (T 1)<br />
Market herbal drug<br />
(T 2)<br />
Self Compounded<br />
Herbal drug (T 3)<br />
Physical parameters, Dry matter intake, Digestibility coefficient and Rumen pH in different groups of crossbred calves at different intervals<br />
Parameters<br />
Hearth girth<br />
(cm)<br />
Body weight<br />
(kg)<br />
DM<br />
(kg)<br />
Intake<br />
Digestibility<br />
(%)<br />
1 st Trial 2 nd Trial 3 rd Trial<br />
15 Days 30 Days 45 Days 60 Days 15 Days 30 Days 45 Days 60 Days 15 Days 30 Days 45 Days 60 Days<br />
104.66 defg ±1.20 109.00 cdef ±0.57 113.00 abcd ±0.57 118.00 ab ±0.57 123.33 cd ±2.40 128.00 bc ±2.52 135.67 ab ±3.84 140.67 a ±3.33 142.33 c ±2.91 144.00 bc ±3.46 145.33 bc ±3.18 147.33 abc ±3.18<br />
78.00 a ±1.15 82.00 a ±1.15 86.66 a ±1.20 91.00 a ±0.57 97.67 ab ±8.11 100.67 ab ±8.11 104.00 ab ±8.39 107.33 ab ±8.37 113.33 a ±2.96 115.67 a ±2.91 118.33 a ±2.40 123.33 a ±3.84<br />
1.63 e ±0.03 1.70 e ±0.08 1.94 c ±0.03 1.70 e ±0.04 2.70 ab ±0.12 2.78 ab ±0.12 2.88 a ±0.12 2.98 a ±0.11 3.09 bcd ±0.11 3.21 abc ±0.05 3.53 ab ±0.02 3.54 ab ±0.17<br />
45.02 abcd ±0.96 43.34 d ±0.78 44.04 cd ±0.30 46.66 a ±0.08 46.35 b ±0.36 46.30 b ±0.61 45.89 bc ±0.79 46.70 b ±0.49 47.45 bc ±0.93 47.23 c ±1.32 47.74 abc ±1.15 47.47 bc ±1.69<br />
Rumen pH 7.38 ab ±0.15 7.22 abcd ±0.05 7.43 a ±0.07 7.34 abc ±0.05 7.11 ab ±0.04 7.20 ab ±0.03 7.10 ab ±0.01 7.12 ab ±0.04 6.15 b ±0.03 6.58 b ±0.35 6.51 b ±0.20 6.35 b ±0.11<br />
Hearth girth<br />
(cm)<br />
Body weight<br />
(kg)<br />
DM<br />
(kg)<br />
Intake<br />
Digestibility<br />
(%)<br />
100.00 g ±3.46 103.66 efg ±3.38 107.66 cdefg ±3.38 112.00 bcde ±3.00 121.33 cd ±0.88 127.67 bc ±1.20 135.33 ab ±1.45 142.67 a ±1.76 142.67 c ±3.38 145.33 bc ±2.91 148.00 abc ±3.21 150.33 abc ±2.91<br />
76.66 a ±3.33 82.00 a ±4.00 83.33 a ±3.38 89.00 a ±3.05 94.67 ab ±0.33 99.00 ab ±0.58 104.33 ab ±0.88 109.00 ab ±1.00 109.67 a ±8.67 113.67 a ±7.84 116.67 a ±7.80 119.00 a ±7.81<br />
1.88 cd ±0.03 1.70 e ±0.03 1.91 cd ±0.01 2.12 b ±0.02 1.79 d ±0.37 1.93 cd ±0.36 2.08 bcd ±0.36 2.27 abcd ±0.34 3.10 bcd ±0.13 3.50 ab ±0.04 3.66 ab ±0.14 3.91 a ±0.14<br />
44.22 bcd ±1.17 44.69 abcd ±0.88 44.50 abcd ±0.47 44.02 cd ±0.68 46.67 b ±0.49 48.20 ab ±0.66 47.84 ab ±0.32 49.38 a ±0.26 46.68 c ±0.49 46.99 c ±0.81 46.52 c ±0.93 47.12 c ±0.53<br />
Rumen pH 7.14 cd ±0.01 7.24 abcd ±0.00 7.25 abcd ±0.04 7.16 bcd ±0.01 7.34 a ±0.06 7.16 ab ±0.12 6.80 bc ±0.28 6.62 cd ±0.10 7.09 a ±0.03 7.13 a ±0.08 6.58 b ±0.03 6.56 b ±0.10<br />
Hearth girth<br />
(cm)<br />
102.00 fg ±4.04 107.33 cdefg ±2.90 114.00 abc ±2.30 121.00 a ±2.08 115.33 d ±3.18 123.00 cd ±2.65 132.00 b ±2.31 141.00 a ±3.21 144.67 bc ±1.45 147.67 abc ±1.45 152.00 ab ±1.15 155.67 a ±0.88<br />
52 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
Body weight<br />
(kg)<br />
77.33 a ±8.96 83.33 a ±9.13 89.00 a ±9.07 95.66 a ±8.95 92.33 b ±2.96 98.33 abab ±3.93 104.00 ab ±3.61 111.00 a ±3.61 111.00 a ±1.00 113.67 a ±0.88 117.33 a ±0.88 121.33 a ±0.88<br />
DM<br />
(kg)<br />
Intake<br />
1.69 e ±0.04 1.76 de ±0.05 2.27 ab ±0.10 2.34 a ±0.05 2.33 abcd ±0.02 2.53 abc ±0.02 2.77 ab ±0.04 2.98 a ±0.07 2.39 d ±0.37 2.70 cd ±0.41 3.22 abc ±0.29 3.87 a ±0.35<br />
Digestibility<br />
(%)<br />
45.85 abc ±0.60 46.09 abc ±0.39 45.35 abcd ±0.28 46.34 ab ±0.35 44.03 c ±0.69 46.16 bc ±0.91 47.21 ab ±1.32 47.45 ab ±0.94 49.38 abc ±0.26 50.55 a ±0.91 50.38 ab ±0.52 50.40 ab ±0.04<br />
Rumen pH 7.11 cd ±0.02 7.15 bcd ±0.03 7.80 de ±0.02 6.87 e ±0.14 7.17 ab ±0.01 6.65 cd ±0.23 6.30 de ±0.13 6.13 e ±0.03 6.61 b ±0.08 6.30 b ±0.02 6.32 b ±0.15 6.26 b ±0.10<br />
Means with different superscript in a row differ significantly (p
GAUTAM et al., Herbal Rumenotoric Drugs and their Effect on Digestion and Growth Performance of Crossbred Calves 53<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Aboul-Fotouh, G. E., Allam, S. M., Shehata, E. I., Abd, S. N. and Azeem,<br />
E. 2000. Effect of some medicinal plants as feed additives on milk<br />
production and composition of lactating buffaloes. Egyptian J.<br />
Nutrition and Feeds., 3(1): 31-41.<br />
Cardozo, P.W., Calsamiglia, S., Ferret, A., Kamel, C. 2006. Effects of<br />
alfalfa extract, anise, capsicum, and a mixture of innamaldehyde<br />
and eugenol on ruminal fermentation and protein degradation in<br />
beef heifers fed a high-concentrate diet. Journal of Animal Science,<br />
84: 2801-2808.<br />
Dawson K.A., Tricarico J. 2002. The evaluation of yeast culturesy 20<br />
years of research., Proc. Altech’s 16th Annual Symp., Altech Tech.<br />
Publ.<br />
Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple Range and Multiple- Test. Biometrics. 11:<br />
142.<br />
Galip, N. 2006. Effect of supplemental yeast culture on ruminal protozoa<br />
and blood parameters in rams. Revue Med. Vet., 157(11): 519-524.<br />
Greathead H. 2003. Plants and plants extracts for improving animal<br />
productivity. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 62: 279-290.<br />
Hristov, A.N., McAllister, T.A., Van Herk, F.H., Cheng, K.J., Newbold,<br />
C.J., Cheeke, P.R. 1999. Effect of Yucca schidigera on Ruminal<br />
Fermentation and Nutrient Digestion in Heifers. J. Anim. Sci., 77:<br />
2554-2563.<br />
Kolte, A., Ravikanth, K., Rekhe, D. and Maini, S. 2009. Role of<br />
Polyherbal formulation in modulating rumen biochemical and growth<br />
performance parameters in Calves. Internet Journal of Veterinary<br />
Medicine. 6: 2, unpaginated.<br />
Kraszewski, J., Wawrzynczak, S., Wawrzynski, M. 2002. Effect of herb<br />
feeding on cow performance, milk nutritive value and technological<br />
suitability of milk for processing. Annals of Animal Science, 2(1):<br />
147-158.<br />
Line-Eric, J. J., Stan Bailey, C. A., Nelson, S. J., Norman and Thomas,<br />
T. 1998. Effect of yeast supplemented feed on Salmonella and<br />
company lobacter population in broilers. Poultry Sci., 77: 405.<br />
Neelam, Rani, Wadhwa, M., Kaushal, S. and Bakshi, M.P.S. 2006. Herbal<br />
feed additives and growth of buffalo calves. Animal Nutrition and<br />
Feed Technology. 6(1): 147-151.<br />
NRC. 1989. In: Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 6th rev. ed.<br />
Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC. pp.90-110.<br />
Pankaj, P.K., Aditya Mishra, Rupesh Jain and Amin, S.W. 2008. Effect<br />
of herbal feed additives on rumen fermentation parameters, nutrient<br />
utilisation and growth in calves. Veterinary Practitioner, 9(1): 89-<br />
93.<br />
Petr Dolezal, Jan Dvoracek, Jan Dolezal, Jana Cermakova, Ladislav<br />
Zeman and Katarzyna Szwedziak. 2011. Effect of feeding yeast<br />
culture on ruminal fermentation and blood indicators of Holstein<br />
dairy cows. Acta Vet. Brno., 80: 139-145.<br />
SAS, 1992. User’s guide: Statistics, SAS Inst., Inc.,Cary, Nc.<br />
Wawrzynczak, S., Kraszewski, J., Wawrzynski, M., Kozlowski, J. 2000.<br />
Effect of herb mixture feeding on rearing performance of calves,<br />
Annals of Animal Science, 27(3): 133-142.<br />
Wohlt, J.E., Finkelstein, A.D., Chung, C.H. 1991. Yeast culture to<br />
improve intake, nutrient digestibility, and performance by dairy<br />
cattle during early lactation. J. Dairy Sci., 74: 1395-1400.<br />
Recieved on 30-11-2012 Accepted on 08-01-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 54-55, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Studies on Nutritional Quality of Idli Fortified with Whey Protein Concentrates<br />
ALKA YADAV 1 , RANU PRASAD 1 AND RAMESH CHANDRA 2<br />
1<br />
Department of Foods and Nutrition, Ethelind School of Home Science and 2 Warner School of Food and<br />
Dairy Technology, Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture, Technology & Sciences (Deemed to be University),<br />
Allahabad 211 007, India<br />
email: alkayadav1122@gmail.com 1<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Most of the developing countries today depends upon various<br />
fermented foods that are staples in the diet. Idli is most popular<br />
breakfast food in south India which is very delicious and<br />
nutritious. The fermentatio n proces s increa ses the<br />
bioavailability of proteins and enhances the vitamin B content<br />
of the food. As it is steamed food, fat content is low and it is<br />
easily digestible. Idli fortified with whey protein concentrate<br />
(WPC) @ 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% were evaluated for nutritional<br />
characteristics. The protein content of WPC fortified idli were<br />
significantly higher then the control (p < 0.05). As a result of<br />
increase in the protein content of the idli sample with the<br />
increase in the levels of WPC. Idli fortified with WPC is high<br />
in protein and low in fat content and which is helpful for people<br />
suffering from diabetes, liver disease and protein energy<br />
malnutrition (PEM).<br />
Key words<br />
Whey protein concentrate, batter, fermentation,<br />
fortification, idli<br />
All over the world, production of fermented foods is<br />
one of the oldest food processing technologies known to<br />
man. In many oriental countries, consumption of fermented<br />
foods is common and usually produced by traditional<br />
methods. The traditional fermented foods contain high<br />
nutritive value and developed a diversity of flavours, aroma<br />
and textures in food substrates. Idli is a traditional cereal/<br />
legume based naturally fermented steamed product with a<br />
soft and spongy texture, which is highly popular and widely<br />
consumed as a breakfast food item in India. (Steinkrans, 1995).<br />
Whey protein concentrate (WPC) is the collection of<br />
globular proteins, isolated from whey, a by - product of cheese<br />
manufactured from cow’s milk. It is pure, all natural, high<br />
quality product that contains little to no fat, lactose or<br />
cholesterol and is a rich source of essential amino acids. In its<br />
purest form, whey protein concentrate (WPC), it provides<br />
benefits for men and women of all ages, including infants and<br />
toddlers. (Patel and Kilara, 1990).<br />
Whey protein concentrate (WPC) is a high quality,<br />
complete protein, with all the essential amino acids. WPC is<br />
also the richest known source of naturally occurring branched<br />
chain amino acids (leucine, isoleucine and valine). WPC is a<br />
soluble and very easy to digest protein. It quickly enters the<br />
body to provide the important essential amino acids needed<br />
to nourish muscles and other body tissues. (Renner and Salam,<br />
1991).<br />
Semolina is the coarse, purified wheat middlings of<br />
durum wheat used in making pasta, breakfast, cereals,<br />
puddings and couscous. Rava idli or rave idli is a variation<br />
of idli, made with Rava / sooji / semolina instead of the usual<br />
rice and urad daal. In India semolina is used to make breakfast<br />
dishes such as upma, sheera, rava idli, rava dosa, rava<br />
uttappam etc. It is also used to make snacks such as maddur<br />
vada etc. Semolina is used to make sweets such as rava ladoo,<br />
rava kheer, semolina puddings etc. It is used in making breads<br />
in small quantity to get a tasty crust.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Preparation of idli<br />
Whey protein concentrate (WPC) was purchased from<br />
Mahan Dairy in New Delhi. Other ingredients such as<br />
Semolina, Eno powder and salt were collected from local market<br />
of Allahabad.<br />
Whey protein concentrate (WPC) was added to semolina<br />
at different ratio @ 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and holding time for<br />
10, 15, 20 and 25 minute for fermentation and then addition of<br />
water to required consistency of batter. Then addition of small<br />
amount of Eno powder and salt in batter. After fermentation<br />
the batter was steam cooked for 10 minute to make idli.<br />
Chemical analysis<br />
Protein, fat, moisture, ash, carbohydrate, energy and<br />
calcium contents were determined using AOAC, 1980 method.<br />
Statistical analysis<br />
The results were analysed statistically for test of<br />
significance by using two way classification and critical<br />
difference technique (CD). (Imran and Coover, 1983)<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
With the increase in the level of WPC in the semolina,<br />
there was an increase in protein content of experimental idli<br />
sample (Table 1). The protein content increased from 5.88% to<br />
8.09% with increasing the level of WPC from 5 % to 20%. The<br />
protein content in the WPC fortified idli was significantly<br />
higher then that of control (p < 0.05). The increase in the<br />
protein content of WPC fortified idli might be due to the<br />
appreciably higher protein content of WPC. The highest<br />
protein percentage was observe in idli sample T 4<br />
H 3<br />
and T 4<br />
H 4<br />
(8.09) then compared to other samples.
Table 1.<br />
YADAV et al., Studies on Nutritional Quality of Idli Fortified with whey Protein Concentrates 55<br />
Average value per 100 gm of idli fortified with whey protein concentrate<br />
Treatments<br />
Nutrients<br />
Protein (%) Fat (%) Moisture (%) Ash (%) CHO (%) Energy (kcal) Calcium (mg)<br />
T 0H 0 5.24 0.48 58.17 0.36 35.74 168.24 7.62<br />
T 1H 1 5.88 0.53 57.33 0.54 35.72 171.18 19.59<br />
T 1H 2 5.87 0.53 57.41 0.54 35.66 170.86 19.55<br />
T 1H 3 5.88 0.53 57.30 0.54 35.75 171.29 19.60<br />
T 1H 4 5.83 0.52 57.64 0.53 35.47 169.93 19.45<br />
T 2H 1 6.55 0.58 55.98 0.71 36.17 174.66 31.20<br />
T 2H 2 6.51 0.58 56.28 0.70 35.93 174.97 30.99<br />
T 2H 3 6.39 0.57 57.08 0.69 35.27 171.78 30.42<br />
T 2H 4 6.39 0.57 57.05 0.69 35.30 171.89 30.44<br />
T 3H 1 7.25 0.64 54.44 0.88 36.79 181.97 42.59<br />
T 3H 2 7.19 0.64 54.81 0.87 36.49 180.46 42.24<br />
T 3H 3 7.09 0.63 55.40 0.86 36.01 178.13 41.69<br />
T 3H 4 7.15 0.64 55.02 0.87 36.32 179.63 42.04<br />
T 4H 1 8.06 0.71 52.10 1.06 38.06 190.92 54.63<br />
T 4H 2 8.08 0.72 51.96 1.06 38.18 191.48 54.79<br />
T 4H 3 8.09 0.72 51.93 1.06 38.20 191.62 54.83<br />
T 4H 4 8.09 0.72 51.93 1.06 38.20 191.61 54.82<br />
The highest fat percentage was observe in idli sample<br />
T 4<br />
H 2,<br />
T 4<br />
H 3<br />
and T 4<br />
H 4<br />
(0.72) and lowest in T 0<br />
H 0<br />
(0.48). The<br />
moisture content was highest in idli sample T 0<br />
H 0<br />
(58.17) and<br />
lowest in T 4<br />
H 3<br />
and T 4<br />
H 4<br />
(51.93). The ash content was highest<br />
in idli sample T 4<br />
H 1,<br />
T 4<br />
H 2,<br />
T 4<br />
H 3<br />
and T 4<br />
H 4<br />
(1.06) and lowest in<br />
T 0<br />
H 0<br />
(0.36). The carbohydrate content was highest in idli<br />
sample T 4<br />
H 3<br />
and T 4<br />
H 4<br />
(38.20) and lowest in T 2<br />
H 3<br />
(35.27). The<br />
highest energy value in idli sample T 4<br />
H 3<br />
(191.62) and lowest<br />
in T 0<br />
H 0<br />
(168.24). The calcium content was highest in idli<br />
sample T 4<br />
H 3<br />
(54.83) and lowest in T 0<br />
H 0<br />
(7.62).<br />
From the findings of this study, it can be concluded that<br />
idli fortified with whey protein concentrate (WPC) can be<br />
successfully used. The addition of different levels of WPC in<br />
semolina/sooji and different holding times for fermentation<br />
can be satisfactory effect on the quality of idli. As a result of<br />
increase in the protein content of the idli sample with the<br />
increase in the levels of WPC. Findings revealed that idli<br />
fortified with whey protein concentrate (WPC) significantly<br />
improves the nutritional value. It is high in protein and low in<br />
fat. This product will be helpful from therapeutic point of view<br />
for people suffering from diabetes, liver disease and protein<br />
energy malnutrition (PEM).<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Imran, R.L. and Coover, W.B. 1983. A modern approach to statistics.<br />
New York: John Willy and Sons Inc, pp. 497.<br />
Patel, M.T. and Kilara, A. 1990. Studies on whey protein concentrate:<br />
Foaming and emulsifying properties and their relationships with<br />
physico–chemical properties. J. of Dairy Science. 73(10): 2731-<br />
2740.<br />
Renner, E. and Abd-EL-Salam. 1991. Application of ultrafiltration in<br />
dairy industry. Elsevier Applied Sci., London.<br />
Steinkraus, K.H. 1995. Handbook of indigenous fermented foods. New<br />
York Marcel Dekker, Ine. Wang, H.L. and G.W. Hasseltin, 1982.<br />
Prescott and Dunne’s Ind. Microbiology. (ed. Read J) AVI Publishing<br />
Co. Inc. Weastport, 492, pp.776.<br />
Recieved on 17-09-2012 Accepted on 02-01-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 56-58, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Evaluation and Assessment of Ground Water of Shivpuri Town in Madhya Pradesh<br />
CHANDANA JA<strong>IN</strong> 1 AND RITU MENDIRATTA<br />
Department of Life Science, Boston College for Professional Studies, Gwalior, M.P.<br />
email: cjainjain91@gmail.com 1<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
This paper aims to the assess physico-chemical properties of<br />
underground drinking water of Shivpuri town of Madhya<br />
Pradesh in India. Underground water samples were collected<br />
from the various places of Shivpuri town and nearby area. The<br />
physico-chemical properties such as color, pH, total dissolved<br />
solid, salinity, electrical conductivity, acidity, alkalinity,<br />
chloride, iron, total hardness, calcium and magnesium<br />
hardness were studied and analyzed. The results obtained were<br />
compared with permissible limits of the drinking water set by<br />
Bureau of Indian Standards. Some water samples were found<br />
within desirable limit. Water from these sources can be used<br />
for drinking purpose. However some sources of water have some<br />
parameters more than permissible level and water from these<br />
sources can’t be used for drinking purpose without special<br />
treatment.<br />
Key word<br />
Ground wa ter, p hysico-chemical properties,<br />
evaluation<br />
In India primary sources of drinking water are surface<br />
water and ground water. About 2.5% of earth’s water is fresh<br />
and suitable for human consumption. Approximately 13% of<br />
this fraction is ground water, used as a important source of<br />
drinking The ground water has been used for drinking for a<br />
long time. Safe drinking water is linked closely to the well<br />
being of human life therefore WHO refers to “control of water<br />
supplies to ensure that they are pure and wholesome” as one<br />
of the primary objectives of environmental sanitation. Surface<br />
water as well as ground water is contaminated by different<br />
physical impurities, agricultural and industrial wastes and<br />
underground chemicals and minerals. It is a cause of growing<br />
concern that a sizable population in India does not have<br />
access to safe drinking water.<br />
Ground water is an essential and vital component of our<br />
life supporting system. The ground water resources are being<br />
utilized for drinking, irrigation and industrial purpose. However<br />
due to rapid growth of population, urbanization,<br />
industrialization and agricultural activities, ground water<br />
resources are under stress. Hence deterioration of ground<br />
water quality is taking place due to geogenic and<br />
anthropogenic activities. Trend in public health system in<br />
India is the growing gap between drinking water supply system<br />
and sanitation service (Jaiprakash, et al., 2000, Kumar, et al.,<br />
2004, Prajapati, et al., 2007, Kumar and King, 2004, Dutta, et<br />
al., 2006, Fatima Rani and Bieta, 2007). Shivpuri district is<br />
located in Madhya Pradesh, India. Shivpuri is located at 25.60 0<br />
N and 77.65 0 E. The average rainfall of Shivpuri district is<br />
about 875 mm most of which is received in monsoon from late<br />
June to early September. In the present study the quality of<br />
drinking water was assessed in terms of physiochemical<br />
parameters in the month of December 2011.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Ground water samples were collected in the month of<br />
December 2011 from 17 underground bore wells and hand<br />
pumps at various locations of Shivpuri town which is a famous<br />
tourist destination of Madhya Pradesh. The location was<br />
chosen as study area because recently presence of Fluoride<br />
is reported in some of the towns of the district. The samples<br />
were collected in sterilized bottles and were stored at 4 0 C till<br />
further investigations. The physico-chemical parameter such<br />
as color, pH, salinity, electrical conductivity, alkalinity, acidity,<br />
TDS, total hardness, Ca and Mg hardness, chloride, total iron<br />
were analyzed according to standard methods of APHA, 2000.<br />
The results obtained were compared with drinking water<br />
quality standards set by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS).<br />
On the basis of classification, the nature of ground water has<br />
been categorized as desirable, permissible and unfit for human<br />
consumption.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The values of different parameters of different samples<br />
are given in Table 1. It was observed that colour of all the<br />
samples was transparent except the sample collected from<br />
Jhiri in Shivpuri was light brown in colour.<br />
pH measures the activity of hydrogen ions (H + ) in the<br />
water. Slightly acidic water have pH value between 6.5 to7<br />
while slightly alkaline water have pH between7.2-8.04.<br />
Therefore, the pH value indicates the alkalinity and CO 2<br />
Fig. 1. pH of water samples
JA<strong>IN</strong> AND MENDIRATTA, Evaluation and Assessment of Ground Water of Shivpuri Town in Madhya Pradesh 57<br />
concentrations of the water. Results show that pH of all the<br />
samples under study varied from 6.96 to 8.04. Water from Jhiri<br />
and Tharra is slightly acidic in nature with pH value 6.96,<br />
while the water form Mansapuran is slightly basic with (8.04<br />
pH).The pH values of all the water samples are within<br />
acceptable limits (pH 8.0) (Figure 1) hence all the samples are<br />
permissible for drinking on the basis of pH.<br />
Total dissolved solid (TDS) consists of inorganic and<br />
organic substances. Inorganic substances which include clay,<br />
silt, minerals, metals, etc. mainly in the form of carbonates,<br />
bicarbonates, chlorides, sulphates, phosphates, nitrates,<br />
calcium, magnesium and sodium can create taste, odor,<br />
hardness, corrosion and scaling problem. TDS of the different<br />
water samples ranged from 246 to 1769 mg/l. Only one samples<br />
(sample No.2) showed high percentage of total dissolved<br />
solids, but it is in the permissible limit.<br />
calcium may contribute to many health problems. Magnesium<br />
is often associated with calcium in all kinds of water but its<br />
concentration remains generally lower than the calcium.<br />
Magnesium content in the samples under study ranged from<br />
9.52mg/L to 142.86 mg/L. It was above the acceptable limit in<br />
sample number 6,7and 14 (Figure 3).<br />
Fig. 3. Mg contents in water samples<br />
Fig. 2. TDS in water samples<br />
Electrical conductivity is directly linked to the<br />
concentration of the ionic impurities in the water. Conductivity<br />
measurements are influenced by pH levels and the temperature.<br />
Conductance of all the samples (except sample number 5 and<br />
14) were ranged between 238µs/cm to 678µs/cm. Conductivity<br />
of sample number 5 and 14 are 1711µs/cm and 949µs/c<br />
respectively, it shows these water samples have high ionic<br />
species. (According to BIS).<br />
Hardness of water is caused by the presence of<br />
multivalent metallic cations and is largely due to calcium and<br />
magnesium ions. Hardness is reported in terms of CaCO 3<br />
. It is<br />
not caused by single substance but by a variety of dissolved<br />
polyvalent metallic ions, predominantly calcium and<br />
magnesium cations. The low and high value of hardness has<br />
advantages and disadvantage. Hardness of all the water<br />
samples is found in the range of 238mg/L to 485.71mg/L. Hence<br />
all the samples fall in the category of hard and very hard.<br />
Calcium is a major constituent of various types of rock.<br />
It is one of the most common constituent presents in natural<br />
water ranging from zero to several hundred milligrams per<br />
liter. Calcium ranged from 190.47mg/L to 438.95mg/L. It shows<br />
all the samples have high concentration of calcium. Excessive<br />
Fig. 4. Calcium contents in water samples<br />
Alkalinity is the content level of carbonate (CO 3<br />
2-)<br />
,<br />
bicarbonate (HCO 3-<br />
) and hydroxide (OH - ) in water. Alkalinity<br />
is the main control factor for the aggressiveness of the water.<br />
Alkalinity of the samples varies from 12 mg/L to 1240 mg/L.<br />
Alkalinity of sample number 5 is found to be very high than<br />
permissible range (30-500mg/L, according to BIS).<br />
Chloride is present in all natural water mostly at low<br />
concentrations. It is highly soluble in water. There is no known<br />
evidence that chlorides constitute any human health hazard.<br />
Chlorides are generally limited to 250mg/L to1000mg/L<br />
(according to BIS). Chloride ion concentration of all the<br />
samples varied from 28.54 to 190.28mg/L and falls in<br />
permissible limits.<br />
Iron is common constituent in ground water. It is present<br />
in water either as soluble ferrous iron or insoluble ferric iron.<br />
Taste of iron is not usually noticeable at iron concentrations<br />
below 0.3mg/L. Although iron has got little concern as a health
58 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
Table 1.<br />
Sample<br />
No.<br />
Ground Water Quality Assessment of Shivpuri.<br />
Colour pH TDS<br />
mg/L<br />
Electrical<br />
conductivity<br />
µs/cm<br />
Acidity<br />
mg/L<br />
Total<br />
hardness<br />
mg/L<br />
1. Sakhya Sagar Lake 2. Bilava village 3. Jasrajpur village 4. Mansapuran 5. Chhatries 6. Sirsod village 7. Ramkhedi village 8. Sighniwas 9. Jhiri village<br />
10. Khurd village 11. Tharra village 12. Balaji Dham 13.Old Shivpuri 14. Bus Stand 15. Govt Hospital 16. Survaya Fort 17. Tourist Village.<br />
Ca<br />
mg/L<br />
concentration in ground water is less than 1.0mg/L as BIS<br />
standard. Total iron content in the samples lie between 0.1mg/<br />
L to 1mg/L, hence fall in permissible range.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Mg mg/L<br />
Alkalinity<br />
mg/L<br />
Cl mg/L<br />
1. Transparent 7.83 394.0 678.0 780.0 333.33 228.57 104.76 470.0 28.54
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 59-62, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Spatial and Modular Variability in Phytosterol Composition in Tribulus terrestris<br />
MANISH MATHUR<br />
18E/564, Chopasni Housing Board, Jodhpur, 342 003, Rajasthan<br />
e-mail: ravi_mm2099@yahoo.com, eco5320@gmail.com<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
In the present investigation spatial and modular variability in<br />
phytosterol concentration were quantified in an important<br />
aphrodisiac plant Tribulus terrestris. The study revealed that<br />
variations in phytosterol concentration were brought by both<br />
spatial and modular factors as well as by their interaction.<br />
Among different modules leaf possessed highest concentration.<br />
Path analysis established various relationships of phytosterol<br />
with edhaphic, plant metabolites and biomass factors. Higher<br />
soil organic carbon and clay content were the most crucial<br />
factors for harvesting phytosterols in larger quantities. Habitat<br />
specific study indicates that older alluvial plains and piedmonts<br />
supports higher phytosterol concentration compared to younger<br />
alluvial plain and sandy plain habitats.<br />
Key words<br />
Phytosterol, Spatial and Modular Variations, Path<br />
Analysis, Steroidal Sapogenin, Clay<br />
Phytosterols are sterols that are synthesized only in<br />
plants and that are structurally similar to cholesterol but with<br />
the inclusion of an extra hydrophobic carbon chain at the C-<br />
24 position. Phytosterols and their esters reduce cholesterol<br />
level in the blood in spite of the fact that they are poorly<br />
absorbed into the blood stream. Sterols are the precursors of<br />
steroid hormones and bile acids in humans, brassinosteroidsphytohormones<br />
in plants and, as the recent identifications of<br />
sterol mutants have shown, they are involved in important<br />
growth and developmental processes in living organisms.<br />
Phytosterols have been isolated from a large number of species<br />
and according to numerous publications (Gordon and Miller,<br />
1997; Dutta and Normen, 1998; Piironen et al., 2000) they<br />
probably exist in all angiosperm and gymnosperm species.<br />
Although, there are more than 40 different phytosterols found<br />
in higher plants, sitosterol, campesterol and stigmasterol often<br />
predominate, while other phytosterols are usually typical only<br />
for certain plant family or even species. Brassicasterol is for<br />
example typical only for Brassicaceae family, and therefore it<br />
could be used for identification (Benveniste, 2002).<br />
Phytosterol production in Digitalis purpurea has been<br />
reported by Evans, 1973 while 67 different medicinal plants<br />
have also been screened for this natural product by Shirley, et<br />
al., 1984. Sarin and Bansal, 2011 have reported phytosterols<br />
in Adhatoda vasica and Ageratum conyzoides from semi arid<br />
Rajasthan. Very informative review on phytosterols<br />
concentration in tomato, apple, potato, carrot, cabbage, canola,<br />
Cucumis melo, Asparagus, Discorea spp., Solanum<br />
melongena, Trigonella foenum-graceum have been made by<br />
Moreau, et al., 2002.<br />
With above information’s a study was conducted to<br />
quantify the spatial and modular variation in phytosterol<br />
concentration in an important medicinal plant Tribulus<br />
terrestris. It is an annual plant cosmopolitan in nature.<br />
Decoction of whole plant as well as fruits is traditionally uses<br />
as aphrodisiac. The objectives includes (a) to find out the<br />
variation in phytosterol composition in different modules of<br />
Tribulus tereestris at various spatial conditions and (b) to<br />
find out relationship between phtyosterol compositions with<br />
bottom up (community dynamics like, Relative Importance<br />
Value {RIV} of Tribulus terrestris, Shannon and Weaver Index<br />
{H’}, evenness and richness), top down factors like soil<br />
parameters (organic carbon, nitrogen, moisture, phosphorus,<br />
soil pH, electric conductivity, soil textures) and primary and<br />
secondary plant metabolites.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Plant materials were collected from five natural sites<br />
during rainy (Pulse events) seasons. The coordinates, habitat<br />
types and other attributes have been mentioned in Table 1.<br />
The phytosterol concentration in the ethanolic plant extract<br />
was done by sperctro-photometrically through Liebermin-<br />
Burchard method (Bloor, 1916). In this method the standard<br />
was prepared with 20 mg. cholesterol and Acetic-anhydride-<br />
H 2<br />
SO 4<br />
was the main reagent. The mechanism of this test<br />
includes that acetic anhydride break down the sterol into<br />
chleostra-3, 5 diene and H 2<br />
SO 4<br />
converted it into Bioscholestra<br />
-3, 5 diene monosulphonate, this produces green colour which<br />
measured spectro-photometrically at 680 nm (Okpuzor, et al.,<br />
2009). This method was chosen for its simplicity and rapid<br />
analysis and it generally gave an approximate level of<br />
phytosterol. Further, HPLC protocol available only for some<br />
particular phytosterol composition of vegetable oil (Okpuzor<br />
et al., 2009 and Mathur, 2012a).<br />
Statistical Analysis<br />
Two way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) in strip plot<br />
design were carried out accordingly Gomez and Gomez, 1984,<br />
where sites were considered as vertical factor and different<br />
modules as horizontal factor.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The mean (µ g g -1 ) concentrations of phtytosterol in<br />
various modules at different spatial levels are presented in<br />
Table 2. Among modules root (295.91 µ g g -1 ) and leaves (636.19<br />
µ g g -1 ) from site 3 possessed maximum phytosterol
60 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
concentration whereas same modules from site 5 showed<br />
minimum concentration 8.07, 119.83 µ g g -1 respectively.<br />
However, stem (274.23 µ g g -1 ) and fruit (195.24 µ g g -1 ) parts<br />
from site 2 and site 4 showed maximum phytosterol<br />
concentration, respectively, while both these modules<br />
possessed their minimum concentration at site one (Table 2).<br />
Analysis of variance (strip plot design) revealed that variations<br />
in phytosterol concentration were brought by both spatial,<br />
modular as well as by their interactions at 99% probability<br />
levels (Table 3).<br />
Path analysis<br />
Regression analysis were carried out to find out the<br />
factors affecting the phytosterol concentration in various<br />
modules and for this different edaphic, plant primary and<br />
secondary metabolites and biomass parameters were<br />
regressed with phytosterol concentration in respective<br />
modules. Steroidal sapogenin showed quadratic relation with<br />
both root (root phytosterol = 1864.10+-23.86 root steroidal<br />
sapogenin+0.074 root steroidal sapogenin^2; P
MATHUR, Spatial and Modular Variability in Phytosterol Composition in Tribulus terrestris 61<br />
a<br />
b<br />
g<br />
h<br />
c<br />
d<br />
i<br />
j<br />
e<br />
f<br />
k<br />
L<br />
m<br />
n<br />
put; P
62 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
matter production is 2 to 3 times more effective than any direct<br />
effect on special production. Thus regression analysis of<br />
phytosterol with above and below ground biomass revealed<br />
the important information about the production ecology of<br />
this important secondory plant product.<br />
The present study provides useful information about<br />
spatial and modular variation in phytosterols compositions<br />
as well as factors affecting it. Such studies are useful for<br />
formulation of phytosterols based product. Study revealed<br />
that leaves and higher soil organic carbon and clay content<br />
are the most crucial factors for harvesting phytosterols in<br />
larger quantities. From above study habitat specific study<br />
indicates that older alluvial plains and piedmonts supports<br />
higher phytosterol concentration compared to younger alluvial<br />
plain and sandy plain habitats. Products like Lipton (by<br />
Uniliver company), Lecithin-phyosterol preparation (by Forbes<br />
medi-tech company), phytosteol-emulsifier complex (by Kraft<br />
company) and corn fiber oil (by Monsanto company) supports<br />
the present study (Moreau, et al., 2002).<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Ali, M.M., Humrawali, N. and Latif, M.T. 2009. Phytosterol compost<br />
ion in surface sediments of kuala Selangor, Selangor, Malaysia.<br />
European Journal of Scientific Research. 33(1): 187-194.<br />
Ash, M.M. 2010. Modulation of lipid metabolism by phytosterol sterates<br />
and black raspberry seed soils. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nebraska,<br />
Lincoln, pp.114.<br />
Benveniste, P. 2002. Sterol metabolism. In: The Arabidopsis, (eds, CR<br />
Somerville, EM Meyerowitz) American Society of Plant Biologists,<br />
Rockville, MD.<br />
Bernath, J. 2002. Production ecology of secondary plant products. In:<br />
Herbs, Species, and Medicinal Plants, (eds.), LE. Craker and JE.<br />
Simon), CBS Publishers and Distributers, New Delhi, India. Vol. 1.<br />
pp.185-234<br />
Bloor, W.R. 1916. The determination of cholesterol in small amount<br />
of blood. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 24: 227-231.<br />
Dutta, C. P. and Normen, L. 1998. Capillary column gas-liquid 78 M.<br />
Kemal G.l and Samija Amar chromatographic separation of 5-<br />
unsaturated and saturated phytosterols. Journal of Chromatography<br />
A, 816: 177-184.<br />
Evans, F. J. 1973. Production of phytosterol by mature Digitalis<br />
purpurea L. plant. Planta, 3: 33-40.<br />
Goad, L.J. and Goeodwin, T.W. 1966. The biosynthesis of sterol in<br />
higher plants. Biochemistry Journal, 99: 735-747.<br />
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for<br />
Agricultural Research. 2, John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.<br />
Gordon, M. H. and Miller, L.A.D. 1997. Development of steryl ester<br />
analysis for the detection of admixtures of vegetable oils. Journal<br />
of American Oil Chemists Society, 74: 505-510.<br />
Grusak, M.A. and Penna, D.D. 1999. Improving the nutrient<br />
composition of plants to enhance human nutrients and health.<br />
Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology,<br />
501: 133-161.<br />
Helfman, E. 1971. Function of sterol in plants. Lipid, 6(2): 128-133.<br />
Itkin, M., Rogachev, I., Alkan, N., Rosenberg, T., Malitsky, S., Masini,<br />
L., Meir, S., Iijima, Y., Aoki, K., de Vos, R., Prusky,D., Burdman, S.,<br />
Beekwilder, J. and Aharoni, A. 2011. Glycoalkaloid metabolism is<br />
required for steroidal alkaloid glycosylation and prevention of<br />
phytotoxicity in tomato. Plant Cell, 23(12): 4507-4525.<br />
Liu, H., Chou, G.X., Wang, J.M., Ji, L.L, and Wang, Z.T. 2011. Steroidal<br />
saponins from the rhizome of Dioscorea bulbifera and their<br />
cytotoxic activity. Plant Medica, 77(8): 845-848.<br />
Mathur, M. 2012a. Variations in phytosterol composition in Corchorus<br />
depressus and their relation with bottom-up, top-down and plant<br />
metabolites. Journal of Natural Products, 5: 179-187.<br />
Mathur, M. 2012b. Phytosterol composition in seeds of Blepharis<br />
sindica and its relation with bottom up, top down and plant<br />
metabolites factors. Medicinal Plants International Journal of<br />
phytomedicine and Related Industries, 4(3): 126-132.<br />
Mbatchou, V.C. and Kosoono, I. 2012. Aphrodisiac activity of oil from<br />
Anacardium occidentale L. seeds and seed shells. Phytopharmacol.,<br />
2(1): 81-91.<br />
Moreau, R.A., Whitaker, B.D. and Hicks, K.B. 2002. Phytosterols,<br />
phytostanols and their conjugates in food: structural diversity,<br />
quantitative analysis and health promoting uses. Progress in Lipid<br />
Research, 41: 75-95.<br />
Okpuzor, J., Okochi, V.I., Ogbungafor, H. A., Ogbonnia, S., Fagbayi, T.<br />
and Obidiegwu, C. 2009. Estimation of cholesterol level in different<br />
brands of vegetable oils. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 8(1): 57-<br />
62.<br />
Pironen, V., Lindsay, D. G., Miettinen, T. A., Toivo, J. and Lampi A. M.<br />
2000 Review Plant sterols: Biosynthesis, biologicalfunction and<br />
their importance to human nutrition. Journal of the Science of<br />
Food and Agriculture, 80: 939-966.<br />
Sarin, R. and Bansal, N. 2011. Phytosterls from In Vivo and In Vitro<br />
clusters of two medicinal plants viz. Adhatoda vasica and Ageratum<br />
conzyoide. International Journal of in Ayurveda and Pharmacy,<br />
2(3): 927-930.<br />
Shirley, N., Hooper, R. and Frunk, C. 1984. Herbal remedies of the<br />
maritime Indians: phytosterol and triterpines of 67 plants. Journal<br />
of Ethnopharmacology, 10(2): 181-194.<br />
Recieved on 10-01-<strong>2013</strong> Accepted on 19-02-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 63-64, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Performance Evaluation of Commercial Reapers for Finger Millet Harvesting<br />
H.G. ASHOKA 1 , G.M. PRASHANTHA 2 , E.G. ASHOK 3 , AND M.V. CHANNA BYREGOWDA 4<br />
1,2<br />
Division of Agricultural Engineering, 3,4 AICRP on Small Millets, University of Agricultural Sciences, G.K.V.K.,<br />
Bangalore 560 065, Karnataka, India<br />
e-mail: agrilengineeruasb@gmail.com 1<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
The experiment was conducted during 2011-12 in finger millet<br />
plot for harvesting Fingermillet (Eleusine coracona gaertn) by<br />
using different commercial reapers viz. Shrachi, Fortune,<br />
KAMCO and Vinayaka make power tiller reaper attachment.<br />
The different reapers were used for testing the suitability for<br />
harvesting of Fingermillet crop and the different genotypes<br />
used were MR I, L 5, GPU 66, GPU 67 and GPU 28. Out of these<br />
genotypes, GPU 67 was considered good for mechanical reaper<br />
harvesting as the crop stand was medium with better inclined<br />
angle of 85 0 . The results indicated that out of four commercial<br />
reapers, Shrachi make is more suitable for harvesting finger<br />
millet crop grown under rainfed condition. The minimum and<br />
satisfactory harvesting stubble height of 8-9 cm with negligible<br />
shattering losses was observed by using Shrachi reaper<br />
compared to other reapers.<br />
Key words<br />
Finger millet, genotypes, Reaper, Harvesting, Field<br />
efficiency, Stubble height, Plant shoot, Shuttering loss<br />
Finger millet (Eleusine coracona gaertn) also known<br />
as Ragi is the most important small millet food and fodder<br />
crop. It is widely grown in Karnataka, Tamilnadu, Andhra<br />
Pradesh, Orissa, Bihar, Gujarat, Maharashtra and in hilly<br />
regions of UP, Sikkim and Himachal Pradesh. Karnataka is the<br />
major finger millet producing state in India covering about<br />
60% of the total area (Anonymous, 2010). This crop is grown<br />
both in dry land as well as in irrigated conditions where<br />
irrigation facilities are available. Rainfed finger millet<br />
constitutes major area of 95% and it is usually grown in Kharif<br />
and irrigated finger millet in Rabi or summer.<br />
Harvesting is one of the high energy consuming<br />
operations involving high cost of production for finger millet.<br />
It is estimated that harvesting consumes about one third of<br />
the total requirement of production system (Ohja and<br />
Devamani, 1987). During the peak harvesting season, getting<br />
the required labour is becoming a difficult task which is forcing<br />
to mechanise the operations. In view of the demand for<br />
mechanising peak seasonal operations, several commercial<br />
reaper harvesters are available for harvesting paddy, wheat<br />
and maize. These reapers cut the crops at ground level and<br />
lay the harvested crop in the form of windrows. However the<br />
reapers are not used to harvest the Finger millet crop due to<br />
the hardy stem of the crop. Thus require sturdier reaper to<br />
withstand field vibrations and cutting load than the one<br />
available for harvesting of paddy and wheat (Kumar, et al.,<br />
2006). Keeping in view of the arising situation demanding for<br />
mechanizing the harvesting operation, a performance<br />
evaluation of four different popular reapers was carried out<br />
during 2011-12 at the UAS, GKVK, Bangalore.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
The field performance of the four popular commercial<br />
reapers viz., Shrachi, Fortune, KAMCO and Vinayaka make<br />
power tiller operated reaper attachment was evaluated for<br />
harvesting finger millet crop at the Division of Agricultural<br />
Engineering, UAS, GKVK, Bangalore. The five different<br />
popular genotypes of Finger millet grown as dry land crop<br />
were utilized for the studies. The different genotypes grown<br />
are MR I, L 5, GPU 66, GPU 67 and GPU 28. The reapers used<br />
for evaluation were kept in good working condition and<br />
operated by a skilled operator. The field of 474 m 2 areas for<br />
each variety was considered for the study. The parameters<br />
like height of cut, speed of operation, fuel consumption, field<br />
capacity, incomplete harvest/left out, shattering losses and<br />
break down for reaper blades were recorded. The crop<br />
parameters like plant height, angle of inclination, plant<br />
population, moisture content at the time of harvest, diameter<br />
of stem at cutting height were also recorded for each variety.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Among the five different genotypes MR 1 was the most<br />
succulent genotypes and having the moisture content of 71%<br />
and GPU 66 had the lowest moisture content of 43%. Whereas<br />
the genotypes viz., GPU 67, L 5 and GPU 28 had the moisture<br />
content of 67.5, 57 and 53.4% respectively. The plant height<br />
was observed to be highest in MR 1 (116.4 cm) followed by<br />
GPU 66 (104.13cm), (Table 1). Except GPU 66, the remaining<br />
genotypes had much greener fodder at the time of harvest.<br />
The inclined angle of 85 0 was observed in GPU 67 and in the<br />
remaining genotypes, the crop stand was highly inclined and<br />
lodged. The plant population was uniform in all the genotypes<br />
and there was not much difference found for number of tillers/<br />
ears per plants. Among the five genotypes GPU 67 had the<br />
greenish fodder due to its staggered nature and medium in<br />
height having the better inclined angle for mechanized<br />
harvesting (Table 1).<br />
The commercial reapers Vinayaka brand reaper was<br />
attached to 15 HP Shrachi power tiller (Table 2). The other<br />
three reapers are Shrachi (Petrol), Fortune (Diesel) and<br />
KAMCO (Petrol) engines attached to exclusive self propelled<br />
reapers having the power source of 4.6, 4.0 and 3.5 HP engines
64 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
Table 1.<br />
Table 2.<br />
Technical specification of commercial vertical conveyor reapers for Finger Millet<br />
Sl.<br />
No.<br />
Particulars Shrachi-petrol Engine<br />
operated<br />
Fortune-diesel Engine<br />
operated<br />
KAMCO,<br />
petrol Engine<br />
Vinayaka, petrol Engine<br />
Power tiller attached<br />
1. Power source, hp 4.6 4.0 3.5 15<br />
2 Power transmission Clutch Clutch Clutch Clutch<br />
3. No. of cutting blades 24 23 25 17<br />
4. Width of cutting, cm 90 110 126 132<br />
5. Windrowing Facility<br />
Fibre plastic Star wheel and<br />
metallic chain with finger<br />
respectively. The shrachi and fortune brands are the imported<br />
units such as; shrachi and fortune have higher operating speed<br />
of 3.5 and 4.0 kmph. The KAMCO was able to operate at the<br />
lowest speed of 3.5 kmph. Among the reapers, the shrachi<br />
reaper could harvest the crop very close to the ground (8-<br />
9cm) and the KAMCO could able to harvest at much higher<br />
height (15cm). Also the shrachi reaper harvested the crop to<br />
the extent 100% compared to other reapers. However, there<br />
was not much shattering loss observed while harvesting by<br />
any of the reapers. The harvesting loss was observed to be<br />
0.2% but it was 0.4% in the case of Fortune reaper. The effective<br />
field capacity was higher in Fortune (0.383 ha/hr) and Vinayaka<br />
(0.373 ha/hr) reapers. Higher effective field capacity of Fortune<br />
is attributed to higher working speed with higher fuel<br />
consumption though the width of operation was lower than<br />
KAMCO and Vinayaka. All the four reapers recorded higher<br />
field efficiency of more than 90% and were comparable to<br />
each other (Table 3).<br />
Among the five different genotypes GPU 67 was having<br />
Fibre plastic Star wheel and<br />
metallic chain with finger<br />
Fibre plastic Star wheel and<br />
metallic chain with finger<br />
the green fodder with medium height having the better inclined<br />
angle for mechanized harvesting. Among the four different<br />
reapers Shrachi reaper harvested the crop completely<br />
compareable to other reapers. Though the width of cut is<br />
90cm, the Shrachi with 4.6HP petrol engine recorded 0.2%<br />
shattering loss with 1.8 lit/hr fuel consumption. The better<br />
harvesting of finger millet was possible by using Shrachi reaper<br />
fitted with 24 cutting blades optimized with 90cm cutting width.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Fibre plastic Star wheel and<br />
non metallic belt with finger<br />
6.<br />
Speed, Forward/<br />
Reverse<br />
2+1 2+1 2+1 2+1<br />
7. Break down Nil Nil Nil Nil<br />
Table 3.<br />
Crop parameters of Finger Millet genotypes at the harvesting stage<br />
Sl. No. Particulars MR I L 5 GPU 66 GPU 67 GPU 28<br />
1.<br />
Green fodder, dry,<br />
Green fodder, medium Green fodder, medium<br />
Appearance of crop at the time of Greenish and tall<br />
medium height, Lodged height, good for height, good for<br />
harvest<br />
(tied)<br />
tied<br />
mechanised harvest mechanised harvest<br />
2.<br />
Moisture content at the time of<br />
harvest, % wb<br />
71 57 43 65.7 53.4<br />
3. Plant height, cm 116.4 93.6 104.13 68.8 95.4<br />
4. Inclined angle of plant<br />
Lodged<br />
Lodged Lodged<br />
Lodged<br />
85<br />
(0-20) (0-22) (0-23)<br />
(0-24)<br />
5. Plant population, no/m² 47 48 45 44 46<br />
6. No. of tillers/ears per plant 1-2 1-2 2-3 2-3 1-2<br />
7.<br />
Diameter of stem at cutting<br />
height, cm<br />
0.9-1.0 0.8 0.8-1.0 0.8-1.0 1.0<br />
8. Yield of grain, q/ha 35 35 38 35 35<br />
Performance evaluation of commercial vertical conveyor reapers for Finger Millet<br />
Sl. No. Particulars Shrachi-petrol<br />
Engine<br />
Fortune-diesel<br />
operated<br />
KAMCOpetrol<br />
Engine<br />
Vinayaka–diesel engine<br />
Power tiller attachment<br />
1. Power source, hp 4.6 4.0 3.5 15<br />
2. Operating speed, kmph 3.5 4.0 2.5 3.2<br />
3. Effective field capacity, ha/hr 0.378 0.396 0.13 0.28<br />
4. Field efficiency, % 90 90 90 92<br />
5. Stubble height, cm 8-9 12.5-15.0 10.2 13.6<br />
6. Left out plant shoots/M 2 Nil 3 1 2<br />
6. Shattering losses, % 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2<br />
7. Fuel consumption, lit/hr 1.8 2.0 1.5 1.7<br />
Anonymous. 2010. http://dacnet.nic.in/extension/document/chapter/<br />
66.htm.<br />
Kumar, K.G., Chowdegowda, M. and Jayamala, G. B. 2006. Comparative<br />
performance of mechanical reapers for harvesting rainfed and<br />
irrigated Fingermillet. Mysore J.agric.Science., 40(3): 351-355.<br />
Ohja, T.P. and Devnami. 1987. Status of harvesting machinery in<br />
India-a country report ‘Regional workshop on Design and<br />
Development of harvesting and threshing equipment’ IARI, New<br />
Delhi, October 4-14.<br />
Recieved on 11-10-2012 Accepted on 15-12-2012
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 65-67, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Induced Mutation Through Gamma Irradiation at Different Doses to Create Genetic<br />
Variability and Study the Improvement in Yield and Yield Attributes of Genotype<br />
HD 2867<br />
SHUBHRA S<strong>IN</strong>GH 1 , RAM, M., S. MARKER, ABRAR YAS<strong>IN</strong>, B. AND AKHILESH KUMAR<br />
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture Technology and<br />
Sciences, Deemed to be University, Allahabad 211 007<br />
email: shubhra_urmi@rediffmail.com 1<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Different doses of gamma rays (20kR, 25kR and 30kR) were<br />
used to irradiate seeds of wheat genotype HD 2867. Treated<br />
seeds were sown along with control to study the induced<br />
variation and improvement in yield and yield contributing traits<br />
in M 2<br />
and M 3<br />
generations. The results revealed significant<br />
differences among the treatments. All three doses were quite<br />
effective in inducing genetic variability. The mean performance<br />
showed improvement in most of mutagenic treatments in M 3<br />
as compared to the corresponding treatments in M 2<br />
generation<br />
over untreated check. The most beneficial dose was 20kR. The<br />
impact of this dose was promising in days to flowering, number<br />
of tillers/plant, plant height, days taken from anthesis to<br />
maturity, days to maturity, test weight and yield/plant. However,<br />
high reduction in the mean value for all the characters were<br />
obtained in response to higher dose of gamma rays (30kR). It<br />
was concluded from this study that there was significant genetic<br />
variability induced through all the three mutagenic treatments.<br />
Significant enhancement in yield and yield contributing traits<br />
were observed at 20kR followed by 25kR. Under the influence<br />
of higher dose of gamma rays (30kR) significant reduction were<br />
observed in yield and yield attributes. It indicates that inducing<br />
genetic variability and improvement in quantitative traits would<br />
be possible through gamma rays.<br />
Key words<br />
Gamma rays, wheat cultivar, variability, yield and<br />
yield traits<br />
Mutation breeding is recognized as one of the driving<br />
force of evolution. Mutation breeding is relatively quicker<br />
method for improvement of various crop species. It is an<br />
important tool to create variability for quantitatively inherited<br />
traits in different plants and is considered as an alternative<br />
method to increase genetic variability in plant breeding<br />
(Camargo, et al., 2000). It is often used to correct defects in a<br />
cultivar, which has a set of good agronomic characteristics<br />
(Sigurbjornsson, 1977). Among various physical mutagens<br />
such as X-rays, fast neutrons, thermal neutrons, ultraviolet<br />
and beta radiation, gamma rays in particular are well known<br />
with their effect on the plant growth and development by<br />
inducing cytological, physiological and morphological<br />
changes in cell and tissues (Thapa, 2004). Gamma radiation is<br />
an important tool for inducing the genetic variability, enhancing<br />
yield and yield contributing traits. However, there is a need to<br />
predict the most beneficial dose of gamma rays for<br />
improvement of specific traits of crop plants because gamma<br />
radiation can induce useful as well as harmful effects. In India,<br />
NP 836 which is an awned mutant from the awnless wheat<br />
variety NP 799, Sharbati Sonara which is an amber grain<br />
colour mutant from the red grain colour wheat variety Sonora-<br />
64 (Singh, 2000) have been developed. Reddy and<br />
Viswanathan, 1999 induced rust resistance in wheat variety<br />
WH 147. Mackey, 1954 reported some beneficial radiation<br />
induced mutants in wheat with increase straw strength,<br />
resistance to stem rust and slightly early maturity. So far in<br />
the world 222 mutant varieties of wheat have been released<br />
(Phundhan Singh, 2010). The present investigation was<br />
undertaken with the objective to induce genetic variability,<br />
study the effect of various doses of gamma rays on yield and<br />
yield components of wheat cultivar HD 2867 and find out<br />
useful mutants in M 2<br />
and M 3<br />
generations under field<br />
conditions.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
The present investigation was carried out in Field<br />
Experimentation Centre, Department of Genetics and Plant<br />
Breeding, Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture,<br />
Technology and Sciences, Deemed-to-be-University,<br />
Allahabad. Dry seeds of wheat genotype HD 2867 irradiated<br />
with 20, 25 and 30 kR doses of gamma rays from radioactive<br />
element Cobalt-60 ( 60 Co) source at National Botanical Research<br />
Institute (NBRI), Lucknow. As per the availability of literature<br />
regarding beneficial dose of gamma rays in wheat crop, 10, 15,<br />
20, 25 and 30 kR are considered to be much perfect dose for<br />
inducing genetic variability and producing desirable mutants<br />
(Arora, et al., 1989, Drozed, 1994, Shkvarnikov and Kulik, 1987).<br />
The effect of various doses of gamma rays was studied in M 2<br />
and M 3<br />
generations (M 1<br />
generation was already being raised<br />
during rabi 2007-08). Sowing of M 2<br />
generation was done during<br />
rabi season 2008-09 (25 th November) and M 3<br />
generation during<br />
rabi season 2009-10 (27 th November). The experiment was laid<br />
out in randomized block design with three replications. Each<br />
plot consisted of 4 rows, 2.5 mt. in length with row and plant<br />
to plant distance of 25 and 15 cm, respectively. In each plot<br />
about 65 treated seeds from 15 mutants that were already<br />
selected from each treatment (20, 25 and 30 kR) in M 1<br />
generation were dibbled along with non-irradiated seeds<br />
(control) to raise M 2<br />
and subsequently M 3<br />
generation.<br />
Selection was carried out in M 2<br />
generation and desirable plants<br />
from each treatment were harvested individually. The M 3
66 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
progeny was raised, from selected M 2<br />
plants and selection<br />
was further advanced on the basis of single plant selection<br />
method. The recommended cultural practices were followed<br />
during the crop growth period. The observations were recorded<br />
for days to flowering, number of tillers/plant, spike length,<br />
grains per spike, plant height, days taken from anthesis to<br />
maturity, days to maturity, 1000 grain weight and yield/plant.<br />
Data for no. of tillers/plant, spike length, no. of grains per<br />
spike and plant height were recorded on five randomly selected<br />
plants in each plot. Data on 1000 grain weight and yield per<br />
plant were recorded in gram. The data recorded for the above<br />
mentioned characters were averaged and subjected to<br />
statistical analysis as outlined by Steel and Torrie, 1980 and<br />
subsequently Duncans Multiple Range Test (Leclarg, et al.,<br />
1963) was used to establish the differences among the different<br />
treatment means.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The differences in the mean value of all the traits due to<br />
different radiation doses were highly significant in both M 2<br />
and M 3<br />
generation. The results correspond to those of Jamil<br />
and Khan, 2002, who irradiated wheat cultivar Bakhtawar 92<br />
by gamma rays at 5, 10, 15 and 25 kR, observed highly<br />
significant differences in the mean value due to different<br />
radiation doses. It is revealed from the Tables 1-2 that<br />
significant delay in flowering was recorded in cv. HD 2867 at<br />
different radiation doses, as the doses increased to higher<br />
level, a delay in days to flowering was noted. An increase of<br />
91 and 92 days was recorded by 30kR followed by 25kR dose<br />
(89 and 90 days) and 20kR (87 and 88 days) as compared to<br />
control (85 days) and also the extent of variability was recorded<br />
higher for this trait both in M 2<br />
and M 3<br />
generation. The present<br />
results are in conformity with the finding reported by Rahim,<br />
et al., 2003. It was observed (Tables 1 and 2) that number of<br />
tillers per plant varied significantly when radiated with various<br />
doses of gamma rays. 20kR dose increased number of tillers<br />
per plant in both M2 (14.16) and M3 (15.26) generations<br />
followed by 25kR dose. The highest dose of 30kR caused<br />
reduction in tillers per plant (8.40 in M2 generation and 9.31 in<br />
M3 generation) as compared to control. The results are in<br />
conformity with those of Din, et al., 2003; who found significant<br />
decrease in number of tillers per plant of different wheat<br />
varieties at higher intensity of gamma radiation. The data<br />
regarding spike length showed significant variability for wheat<br />
genotype HD 2867 due to different radiation doses. However,<br />
all the radiation doses showed reduction in spike length while<br />
comparing the mean values of gamma rays with one another.<br />
The minimum spike length (8.71 in M 2<br />
and 9.67cm in M 3<br />
generation) was recorded with 30kR dose and maximum spike<br />
length (12.21 in M 2<br />
and 12.29cm in M 3<br />
generation) was recorded<br />
in control. The findings are in agreement with those already<br />
reported by Khan, et al., 2003. It was inferred from the tables<br />
1-2 that both in M2 and M3 generations there was significant<br />
variation observed for number of grains per spike. By<br />
comparing the mean values due to various radiation doses<br />
with one another it was observed that the number of grains<br />
per spike was reduced as the radiation dose increased. The<br />
maximum decrease in number of grains per spike was observed<br />
due to 30kR dose of gamma rays, 52.13 in M 2<br />
and 53.32 in M 3<br />
generation as compared to control. These results are in<br />
agreement with those of Khamankar, 1989. It was apparent<br />
from the results (Tables 1-2) that extent of variability in plant<br />
height increased in both the generations.<br />
The radiation dose of 30kR gamma rays reduced plant<br />
height, 84.48cm in M2 generation and 85.28cm in M3 generation<br />
over the control. It was noted that plants radiated with 20kR<br />
gamma rays showed significant increase in plant height,<br />
91.55cm in M 2<br />
and 92.34cm in M 3<br />
generation over untreated<br />
Table 1.<br />
Mean performance of various characters of wheat genotype HD 2687 treated with different doses of gamma rays in<br />
M 2<br />
generation<br />
Radiation Days to No. of Spike No. of Plant Days taken from Days to 1000 Yield/plant<br />
dose (kR) flowering tillers/plant length grains per height anthesis to maturity grain (g)<br />
(cm) spike (cm) maturity wt (g)<br />
Control 85d 10.54c 12.21a 56.43a 90.39b 32c 116d 40.53c 10.39c<br />
20 87c 14.16a 10.87b 54.38b 91.55a 34a 121a 43.31a 12.16a<br />
25 89b 13.32b 9.68c 53.34c 88.71c 33b 120b 42.46b 11.36b<br />
30 91a 8.40d 8.71d 52.13d 84.48d 30d 118c 38.57d 9.43d<br />
Mean values sharing same letter does not differ significantly at 5% level of probability (P=0.05)<br />
Table 2.<br />
Mean performance of various characters of wheat genotype HD 2687 treated with different doses of gamma rays in<br />
M 3<br />
generation<br />
Radiation Days to No. of Spike No. of Plant Days taken from Days to 1000 Yield/plant<br />
dose (kR) flowering tillers/plant length grains per height anthesis to maturity grain (g)<br />
(cm) spike (cm) maturity wt (g)<br />
Control 85d 10.41c 12.29a 56.59a 90.41b 33c 117d 40.83c 10.68c<br />
20 88c 15.26a 11.68b 55.51b 92.34a 35a 122a 44.28a 13.16a<br />
25 90b 14.41b 10.54c 54.21c 89.53c 34b 121b 43.16b 12.21b<br />
30 92a 9.31d 9.67d 53.32d 85.28d 31d 119c 39.11d 10.22c<br />
Mean values sharing same letter does not differ significantly at 5% level of probability (P=0.05)
S<strong>IN</strong>GH et al., Induced mutation through gamma irradiation at different doses to create genetic variability 67<br />
check. So, all the doses adversely affected the average plant<br />
height. Plant height was inversely proportional to the increase<br />
in the radiation intensity. The results are in conformity with<br />
Muhammad and Khalid, 2001. In response to various doses<br />
of gamma rays, significant differences in the mean values were<br />
observed for days taken from anthesis to maturity. By<br />
comparing the effect of various radiation doses, it was<br />
observed that all the doses (except 30kR) increased days taken<br />
from anthesis to maturity in both the generations, 34 days in<br />
M 2<br />
and 35 days in M 3<br />
generation by 20kR followed by 25kR<br />
over control. It was found from the present investigation that<br />
days to maturity significantly increased due to various doses<br />
of gamma radiation over untreated control. The extent of<br />
variability for this trait was higher in both M 2<br />
and M 3<br />
generations. The differences in the mean values for 1000 grain<br />
weight due to various doses of gamma rays varied significantly<br />
both in M 2<br />
and M 3<br />
generations. By comparing the mean values<br />
of various doses with one another it was found that 1000<br />
grain weight significantly decreased due to 30kR radiation<br />
dose, 38.57g in M 2<br />
and 39.11g in M 3<br />
generation as compared<br />
to control. The maximum increase in 1000 grain weight (gm)<br />
was observed in response to 20kR radiation dose, 43.31g in<br />
M 2<br />
and 44.28g in M 3<br />
generation followed by 25kR radiation<br />
dose over untreated check. In general, gradual decrease in<br />
1000 grain weight appeared due to increase in radiation intensity<br />
both in M 2<br />
and M 3<br />
generation. These findings are inline with<br />
Muhammad, et al., 2003. The differences in the mean values<br />
for grain yield per plant due to different doses of gamma rays<br />
were highly significant. The data from the Tables 1-2 revealed<br />
that there was significant increase in the grain yield per plant<br />
at 20kR radiation dose, 12.16g in M 2<br />
and 13.05g in M 3<br />
generation followed by 25kR radiation dose over control. The<br />
results are in agreement to those of Jamil and Khan, 2002 and<br />
Khan, et al., 2003. However, at 30kR radiation dose grain yield<br />
decreases significantly, 9.43g in M 2<br />
and 10.22g in M 3<br />
generation<br />
as compared to control.<br />
Change brought by mutation is permanent and heritable.<br />
If the changes would be brought by environment they are not<br />
fixable and heritable. For example, from present investigation<br />
it has been observed that in both M 2<br />
and M 3<br />
generation, there<br />
is continuous induction of genetic variability and all the<br />
treatments are showing their effect continuously. If it will be<br />
due to environmental fluctuation such permanent changes<br />
could not observed generation after generation.<br />
From the above foregoing results and discussion, it is<br />
concluded that different doses of gamma rays in wheat<br />
genotype HD 2867 provide enough scope by developing a<br />
wide range of variation in desirable plant attributes to select<br />
high yielding mutants. From the present study significant<br />
genetic variability was induced through all the three mutagenic<br />
treatment and also enhancement in yield and yield<br />
contributing traits were observed at 20kR followed by 25kR.<br />
Under the influence of higher dose of gamma rays (30kR)<br />
significant reduction were observed in yield and yield<br />
attributes. It indicates that inducing genetic variability and<br />
improvement in quantitative traits would be possible through<br />
gamma rays. Hence, gamma ray played a pivotal role in crop<br />
breeding through mutation and stability of genetic variability<br />
should be analyzed in succeeding generations and selection<br />
of desirable mutants could be performed for a successful<br />
breeding programme.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Arora, R., Maherchandani, N., Uppal, S. 1989. Modulation of radiation<br />
effects in wheat by growth regulators. Ann. Biol., Ludhiana, 5:<br />
109-113.<br />
Camargo, C.E.D.O., Neto, A.T., Filho, A.W.P.F., Felico, J.C. 2000.<br />
Genetic control of aluminium tolerance in mutant lines of the<br />
wheat cultivar Anahuac. Euphy. 114: 47-53.<br />
Din, R., Khan, M.M., Qasim, M., Jehan, S., Khan, M.M.I. 2003. Induced<br />
mutability studies in three wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties<br />
for some morphological and agronomical characteristics. Asian J.<br />
of Pl. Sci., 17(2): 1179-1182.<br />
Drozed, D. 1994. The effect of radiation on spring wheat properties.<br />
Int. Agrophys. 8: 209-213.<br />
Khamankar, Y.G. 1989. Gamma ray irradiation and selection for yield<br />
components in bread wheat. PKV Res. J., 13:1-5.<br />
Khan, M.M., Din, R., Qasim, M., Jehan, S., Iqbal, M.M. 2003. Induced<br />
mutability studies for yield and yield related characters in three<br />
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties for some morphological and<br />
agronomical characteristics. Asian J. of Pl. Sci., 2: 1183-1187.<br />
Leclarg, R.L., Leonard, W.H., Clark, A.G. 1962. Field plot technique.<br />
2 nd ed. Burgees publish. Co. South Minnesota. pp. 144-146.<br />
Madina Jamil, Umer Khan Q. 2002. Study of genetic variation in yield<br />
components of wheat cultivar buktawar-92 as induced by gamma<br />
radiation. Asian J. of Pl. Sci., 1(5): 579-580.<br />
Mackey, J. 1954. Neutron and x-ray experiments in wheat and revision<br />
of speltoid problem. Hereditas, 40:65-180.<br />
Muhammad Irfaq, Khalid Nawab, 2001. Effect of gamma irradiation on<br />
some morphological characteristics of three wheat (Triticum<br />
aestivum L.) cultivars. Online J. of Bio. Sci., 1(10): 935-937.<br />
Muhammad, Mohibullah, Khan, Rahim, Din, Muhammad, Qasim, Shah<br />
Jehan, Malik Muhammad Iqbal, 2003. Induced mutability studies<br />
for yield and yield related characters in three wheat (Triticum<br />
aestivum L.) varieties. Asian J. of Pl. Sci., 2: 17-24.<br />
Phundan, Singh. 2010. Essentials of Plant Breeding, Kalyani Publishers,<br />
New Delhi, pp. 219.<br />
Rahim, Din, Muhammad, Qasim, Khalil, Ahmad, Shah, Jehan. 2003.<br />
Study of days taken to earing initiation and earing completion in<br />
M 1<br />
generation of different wheat genotypes irradiated with different<br />
doses of gamma radiation. Asian J. of Pl. Sci,. 2(12): 894-896.<br />
Reddy, V.R.K., Viswanathan, P. 1999. Induced rust resistant mutants in<br />
hexaploid wheat “WH 147”, Crop Research (Hisar). pp. 443-445.<br />
Shkvarnikov, P.K., Kulik, M.I. 1987. Induction of mutation in wheat,<br />
Academy of Sciences, Ukrainian SSR, Kiev, USSR. 41: 204-217.<br />
Sigurbjörnsson, B. 1977. Introduction Mutations in Plant Breeding<br />
Programs. Manual on Mutation Breeding Second Edition Tech.<br />
Report Series. 119 IAEA,Vienna, pp. 1-6.<br />
Singh, B.D. 2000. Plant Breeding, Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, pp.<br />
627-628.<br />
Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics.<br />
McGraw Hill Book Comp. Inc., New York.<br />
Thapa, C.B. 2004. Effect of acute exposure of gamma rays on seed<br />
germination and seedling growth of Pinus kesiya gord and P.<br />
wallichiana A.B. jacks. Our Nature, 2: 13-17.<br />
Recieved on 21-11-2012 Accepted on 21-01-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 68-69, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Assesment of Genetic Divergence in Chickpea Genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.)<br />
SUDHANSHU JA<strong>IN</strong> 1 AND Y.M. <strong>IN</strong>DAPURKAR<br />
Deptt. of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, RVSKVV, Gwalior<br />
email: sudhanshujain07@yahoo.in 1 Table 2. Intra (diagonal) and inter-cluster average<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
A study was carried out on the thirty genotypes of chickpea to<br />
study the nature and magnitude of genetic divergence using<br />
Mahalanobis’s D 2 Statistics. The data were recorded on eight<br />
important quantitative traits from the genotypes grown in<br />
Randomized Block Design having three replication. The thirty<br />
chickpea genotypes were grouped into six clusters. The cluster<br />
I shows largest cluster with eight genotypes. Highest inter<br />
cluster distance was observed between cluster IV and cluster V,<br />
followed by cluster V and VI. The cluster VI was identified for<br />
pods per plant and seed yield per plant. Whereas genotypes<br />
included in cluster II were of early maturity with early flowering<br />
habit and average plant height. Genotypes included in these<br />
two clusters can be utilized for future crop improvement<br />
programme.<br />
Key word<br />
Chickpea, genetic divergence<br />
Assessment of genetic diversity of cultivated crop plants<br />
is very important to select proper genotypes for a hybridization<br />
program. Inclusion of genetically divergent parents in any<br />
breeding programme is essential to create new genetic stocks.<br />
Genetic diversity is the most important tool in the hands of<br />
the plant breeder in choosing the right type of parents for<br />
hybridization programme. The divergence can be studied by<br />
technique using D2 statistics developed by Mahalanobis,<br />
1936. It is based on multivariate analysis and grouped into<br />
various cluster. This is considered as the most effective method<br />
for qualifying the degree of genetic diversity among the<br />
genotypes included in the study. The present investigation<br />
aimed to estimate the magnitude of genetic divergence present<br />
in the genotypes and to identify the diverse genotypes for<br />
future.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Thirty genotypes of chickpea were grown during rabi<br />
(winter) 2010-11 in a randomized block design with three<br />
replication at College of Agriculture, RVSKVV, Gwalior.<br />
Observations were recorded on five randomly tagged plants<br />
for Days to 50% flowering, Days to maturity, Plant height<br />
(cm), Number of branches per plant, Number of pods per plant,<br />
Number of seeds per pod, 100 seed weight (g) and Yield per<br />
plant (g). Wilks criteria was used to test the significance of<br />
differences in mean values of all the 10 characters. Genetic<br />
diversity was studied using Mahalanobis’s D 2 and clustering<br />
of genotypes was done according to Toucher’s method. Intra<br />
and inter-cluster distances and mean performance of the<br />
clusters for the characters were also computed.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The analysis of variance for the experimental design<br />
showed highly significant differences among genotypes for<br />
all the characters studied. 30 genotypes were grouped into VI<br />
clusters using Mahalanobis D 2 statistics and Tocher’s method<br />
(Table 1). The cluster I was the largest and consisted of 8<br />
genotypes followed by clusters IV which had 7 genotypes.<br />
The cluster III and VI had 5 genotypes, cluster II had 3<br />
genotypes and cluster V had 2 genotypes. This suggested<br />
the presence of high degree of divergence in the material.<br />
Highest inter cluster distance was observed between cluster<br />
IV and cluster V followed by I and VI and V and VI respectively<br />
(Table 2).<br />
Average intra and inter cluster D 2 values among 30<br />
genotypes revealed that the cluster IV showed maximum intra<br />
cluster D 2 value (4.036) followed by cluster VI (3.818) and<br />
cluster I (3.530) indicating presence of diversity in these<br />
clusters. The inter cluster D 2 values ranged from 17.430 to<br />
6.105. Maximum inter cluster D 2 value was observed between<br />
cluster IV and V (17.430) which indicates that the genotypes<br />
Table 1.<br />
Distribution of 30 genotypes of chickpea into<br />
different clusters<br />
Cluster Number of<br />
Genotypes<br />
number genotypes<br />
I 8 C505,C513,C516,C532,C533,C534,C535,C537<br />
II 3 C502,C510,C523<br />
III 5 C504,C507,C514,C530,JG16,<br />
IV 7 C508,C509,C511,C517,C519,C522,C528<br />
V 2 C501,C525<br />
VI 5 C520,C521,C526,C529, C531<br />
distances (D 2 ) for 10 characters in 30 genotypes<br />
of chickpea<br />
Cluster number I II III IV V VI<br />
I 1.879 3.008 2.471 3.221 3.117 4.142<br />
(3.530) (9.084) (6.105) (10.374) (9.715) (7.156)<br />
II 1.547 2.927 3.065 3.292 2.857<br />
(2.393) (8.567) (9.394) (10.387) (8.265)<br />
III 1.722 3.912 3.441 2.716<br />
(2.965) (15.303) (11.840) (7.376)<br />
IV 2.009<br />
(4.036)<br />
4.175<br />
(17.430)<br />
2.790<br />
(7.784)<br />
V 1.516<br />
(2.298)<br />
3.713<br />
(13.786)<br />
VI 1.954<br />
(3.818)
JA<strong>IN</strong> AND <strong>IN</strong>DAPURKAR, Assesment of Genetic Divergence in Chickpea Cultivars (Cicer arietinum L.) 69<br />
Table 3.<br />
Cluster mean values of 6 clusters for 8 characters<br />
in 30 genotypes of chickpea.<br />
S. Cluster No./<br />
I II III IV V VI<br />
No. Character<br />
1 Days to 50% 72.42 62.98 72.00 78.00 68.50 72.20<br />
flowering<br />
4 Days to maturity 128.83 128.11 129.40 128.57 131.57 129.00<br />
3 Plant height (cm) 38.91 40.76 34.11 44.69 37.13 46.32<br />
4 Number of branches 3.39 4.02 4.33 4.19 3.83 3.89<br />
per plant<br />
5 Number of pods per 37.75 47.00 47.13 52.62 50.83 62.00<br />
plant<br />
6 Number of seeds per 1.10 1.40 1.08 1.44 1.13 1.43<br />
pod<br />
7 100 seed weight (g) 27.00 26.96 22.55 23.19 37.73 27.41<br />
8 Yield per plant (g) 12.67 16.98 13.24 13.54 15.97 22.61<br />
included in these different clusters may give high heterotic<br />
response in crop improvement programmes. Because crosses<br />
made between the genotypes of clusters separated by large<br />
inter-cluster distances (Sandhyakishore, et al., 2007; Chandra,<br />
et al., 2007) show high heterosis. Similar findings have been<br />
reported by Lal, et al., 2001. Minimum inter cluster D 2 value<br />
was observed between cluster I and III (6.105) indicating the<br />
close relationship among the genotypes included in these<br />
two clusters. The average cluster means for 10 characters<br />
(Table 3) revealed that genotypes included in cluster II were<br />
of early maturity with early flowering habit and average plant<br />
height. Selection of genotypes from this cluster for these<br />
characters may yield desirable results. Cluster III showed<br />
highest mean for number of branches per plant. Cluster IV<br />
showed higher mean performance for number of seeds per<br />
pod, where as cluster V showed maximum mean performance<br />
for 100 seed weight. Similar findings have been reported by<br />
Sable, et al., 2000. The cluster VI showed highest mean for<br />
pods per plant and seed yield per plant. The genotypes<br />
included in the cluster I showed minimum mean value for<br />
number of branches per plant, number of pods per plant and<br />
yield per plant. Diverse clusters namely, VI and II hold good<br />
promise as parents for obtaining potential hybrids for desirable<br />
characters and thereby creating greater variability to improve<br />
the yield. Similar result has been reported by Kumar, et al.,<br />
1997.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Chandra, B.S., Reddy, T.D. and Ansari, N.A. 2007.Genetic divergence<br />
in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Res. Crops, 8: 600-603.<br />
Kumar, N. 1997. Genetic diversity among chickpea accession. Ind. J.<br />
Genet. Plant Breed., 57(1): 12-15.<br />
Lal, D., Ram Krishna and S. Gurpreet, 2001. Genetic divergence in<br />
chickpea. Ind. J. Pulses Res., 14(1): 63-64.<br />
Mahalanobis, P.C., 1936. On the generalized distance in statistics. Proc.<br />
Natl. Inst. Sci. India. 2: 49-55.<br />
Sable, N.H., P.W., Khorgade and M.N., Narkhede, 2000. Genetic<br />
parameters and formulation of selection indices in chickpea. Annuals<br />
of Plant Physiology, Pub., 14(1); 83-87.<br />
Sandhyakishore, N., Babu, V.R., Ansari, N.A. and Chandran, R. 2007.<br />
Genetic divergence analysis using yield and quality traits in rice<br />
(Oryza sativa L.). Crop Improv., 34:12-15.<br />
Recieved on 17-11-2012 Accepted on 23-01-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 70-72, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Phytotoxic Effect of Asclepias curasavica Linn on Metabolism of Parthenium<br />
hysterophorus L<br />
T.G. NAGARAJA 1 AND A.H. PUDALE 2<br />
1<br />
Department of Botany, The New College, Kolhapur 416 012, Maharashtra State, 2 Department of Agrochemicals<br />
and Pest Management, Shivaji University, Kolhapur 416 004, Maharashtra State<br />
email: tgnagaraja2010@gmail.com 1<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
The present paper deals with the powdered leaves, stem and<br />
roots of Asclepias curasavica Linn adversely affected the<br />
metabolism of Parthenium hysterophorus L upto 30 DAS. It<br />
influenced plant height and number of leaves per plant. The<br />
biochemical constituents such as total chlorophylls, polyphenols<br />
and carbohydrate (sugar) contents were decreased in leaves,<br />
stem and roots of Parthenium hysterophorus L supplied with<br />
Asclepias curasavica L residues. The total lipid and protein<br />
contents were greatly reduced as compared to control.<br />
Therefore, residues of Asclepias curasavica L may be used as a<br />
potential bioherbicide.<br />
Key words<br />
Asclepias curasavica, Parthenium hysterophorus,<br />
sugars, lipids, chlorophylls and Proteins.<br />
Parthenium hysterophorus L is an annual herbaceous<br />
weed, aggressively colonizes in disturbed sites, native to<br />
Mexico, Central and South America. In India it is wide spread<br />
in grassland, fruit tree, orchards and arable land in natural and<br />
acidic soils. In India the weed is considered to be a major<br />
problem (Gupta and Sharma, 1977), because, it has high rate<br />
of fecundity, efficient seed dispersal and adaptability to grow<br />
under adverse environmental conditions. Because of high<br />
prolific rate of reproductive ability, this exotic weed dominated<br />
in arable and non-arable land. In some areas it has become an<br />
extremely serious in agricultural and rangeland habitats.<br />
Parthenium hysterophorus L is also know to be allergenic to<br />
some people and live stock, it creates allergic skin diseases,<br />
asthma in human beings, due to presence of allelopathic effect<br />
(Das and Das, 1995). The allelopathic potential of Parthenium<br />
hysterophorus L weed results from release of phytotoxic<br />
substances such as ferulic, chlorogenic, P-coumaric and P-<br />
hydrobenzoic acids, parthenin, ambrasin and coronopilines<br />
etc, which inhibits the germination growth of several crops<br />
and multipurpose trees (Basak, 1984) and also cause allergic<br />
dermatitis and asthma in human beings (Auld and Medd. 1987).<br />
Hence, it is a problematic weed in Indian agricultural system.<br />
At present it is controlled by mechanical and use of other<br />
herbicides. The used of herbicides created hazards on our<br />
ecosystem. Therefore, an interest created to study an<br />
alternative ecofriendly approach to control Parthenium. Thus<br />
the concept of allele chemicals utilized to control Parthenium<br />
hysterophorus L.<br />
Asclepias curasavica Linn commonly called milk weed<br />
or silk weed or butterfly weed, blooms almost continuously in<br />
uncultivated waste lands, sometimes cultivated, even in<br />
garden, as the blooms are quite attractive to butterflies,<br />
especially Monarch butterflies. Because of its popularly as<br />
an ornamental plant, it has become natural weed in tropical<br />
and sub tropical pastures, fields and disturbed areas<br />
throughout the world. The plant is toxic to animals, a resinoid<br />
(galitoxin) is the toxic principle found in the milk latex of the<br />
plant stem. The plant also possess other phytochemicals<br />
such as cardiac glycosides, acetyl-beta-glucosominidase,<br />
asclepin and beta fucosiodase. Even in ayurveda, whole plant<br />
is considered as emetic, styptic, and purgative. Powder of<br />
root mixed with equal quantity of Acorus root is given in<br />
chronic ulcers, sometimes root decoction is used against<br />
cancer (Joshi, 2000). As the plant Asclepias curasavica L<br />
possess several phytochemicals, therefore, an attempt has<br />
been made to study the effect of phytochemicals<br />
(Allelochemicals) on growth and metabolism of<br />
P.hysterophorus Lin to identify its suitability as a botanical<br />
herbicide.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Freshly harvested leaves, stem and roots of Asclepias<br />
curasavica Linn from Ambai Defence colony, Kolhapur during<br />
the months of July-Nov 2010, for experimental study were<br />
collected. The collected sample were washed properly through<br />
distilled water and air dried and kept for oven at 70ºC for<br />
consecutive three days. The dried material of leaves, stem<br />
and roots were finely powdered in domestic grinder separately.<br />
Pot studies were carried out during September to December<br />
2010 in the Botanical Garden of Department of Agro Chemicals<br />
and Pest Management, Shivaji University, Kolhapur.<br />
The fire clay pots of 9 cms deep and 21 cm diameter were<br />
filled with 10 kg of loam soil. Finely powdered dried samples<br />
of leaves, stem and roots of Asclepias curasavica L were<br />
mixed at the rate of 100 gm per pot separately. In each fire clay<br />
pot five viable seeds of Parthenium hysterophorus L were<br />
sown at equal distance, one pot used as control. Uniform<br />
watering was done i.e., 100 ml per pot continuously up to 30<br />
days (Days after sowing). After 30 days treated plant parts<br />
were used for biochemical test and growth parameters.<br />
The treated (residues of A.curasavica L) leaves, stem<br />
and roots on Parthenium hysterophorus L were used for<br />
experiment which was laid down in randomized block design
NAGARAJA AND PUDALE, Phytotoxic Effect of Asclepias Curasavica Linn on Metabolism 71<br />
with two replicates. The Chlorophyll content from leaves and<br />
stem of treated samples were extracted with 80% acetone along<br />
with control samples and estimated by the method of Arnon,<br />
1949. The polyphenol content were determined by the method<br />
of Folin and Denis, 1915. The total carbohydrate and starch<br />
measured by the Anthrone method presented by Hodge and<br />
Hofreiter, 1962 and Thayumanavan and Sadasivan, 1984. The<br />
soluble proteins were estimated by the method of Lowery, et<br />
al., 1951. The reducing sugars were calculated by<br />
dinitrosalicylic acid method (Miller, 1972) and fatty acids were<br />
calculated by Cox and Pearson, 1962 method.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Ground plant parts (leaves, stem and roots) of Asclepias<br />
curasavica Linn significantly inhibited the growth parameters<br />
like height and number of production of leaves on Parthenium<br />
hysterophorus L.<br />
The germination and growth of Parthenium<br />
hysterophorus L was hindered, 69.23% and 53.84% was<br />
reduced in leaves and stem extracts. While 38.46% was reduced<br />
in root treatment. A significant 35.29 and 29.41% of reduction<br />
was noticed after 30 DAS (Table 1) with least per cent growth<br />
(17.64%) in root extract was recorded.<br />
A parallel result were recorded on production of leaves<br />
in P.hysterophorus L due to application of residues of A.<br />
curasavica Linn (Table 1). The numbers of leaves were reduced<br />
as compared to control, after 30 DAS treatment. A maximum<br />
of 35.29 per cent of reduction was recorded in leaf extract<br />
followed by stem and root as compared to control. A similar<br />
investigation was carried out Nagaraja and Deshmukh, 2009<br />
in residues of Andrographis paniculata. Thus totally plant<br />
height and number of production of leaves hindered<br />
significantly may be due to phyto toxicity effect of Asclepias<br />
curasavica L. Hence, allelochemicals may have a great<br />
influence on physiology and metabolism process. Therefore,<br />
growth and inhibition of Parthenium hysterophorus L may<br />
be due to allele chemicals released from leaf, stem and roots of<br />
A. curasavica L (Thaper and Singh, 2006).<br />
Meanwhile application of leaf, stem and root biomass<br />
(residues) of A.curasavica L on Pathenium hysterophorus L<br />
shows (Table 2) reduced its phytochemicals. The total<br />
chlorophylls get reduced as compared to control. 11.70 mg of<br />
chlorophyll per 100 g of fresh tissue get reduced to 10.91 g in<br />
leaves, 6.10 mg in stem and 2.60 mg in root after 30 DAS<br />
treatment. A parallel findings were reported by Nagaraja and<br />
Deshmmukh, 2009 in Andrographis paniculata. The<br />
polyphenol content were responsible for resistant has been<br />
extensively worked out Deshpande, 1993, get reduced in<br />
treated parts of Parthenium hysterophorus L (Table 2) after<br />
30 DAS of treatment with residues. The total carbohydrate<br />
content in all treated plant parts such as leaves, stem and<br />
roots (P. hysterophous) get reduced, similarly starch and<br />
reducing sugar also reduced after 30 DAS of treatment (Table<br />
2) Hence, allele chemicals interferes with photosynthesis, in<br />
relation to water (Colton and Einhelling, 1980) and nutrient up<br />
take (Craig and Einhelling, 1980), which were required for the<br />
metabolism of number of organic compounds.<br />
The lowered synthesis of carbohydrates due to<br />
Table 1. Phytotoxic effect of Asclepias curasavica Linn on growth and development of Parthenium hysterophorus L<br />
Treatment<br />
by residues<br />
Number of leaves per plant<br />
after 15 days<br />
Percentage of reduction in<br />
production of leaves<br />
Plant height in<br />
cm. after 15 days<br />
Percentage of reduction of<br />
growth in height<br />
Control 6-7 -- 3-8 --<br />
Leaf residue 4-5 69.23 2-9 76.31<br />
Stem residue 3-4 53.84 2-7 71.05<br />
Root residue 2-3 38.46 1-6 42.10<br />
AFTER 30 DAS<br />
Control 8-9 --- 5-7 ------<br />
Leaf residue 2-4 35.29 2-8 49.12<br />
Stem residue 2-3 29.41 2-5 43.85<br />
Root residue 1-2 17.64 1-2 19.29<br />
Table 2. Effect of residues of leaves, stem and root of Asclepias curasavica L on Parthenium hysterophorus L-regarding<br />
Biochemical constituents after 30 DAS<br />
Sr.No Constituents Control Leaves Stem Root<br />
1. Chlorophyll a* 13.30 5.15 7.20 3.30<br />
Chlorophyll b* 13.40 5.70 6.40 1.80<br />
Total chlorophylls( a + b )* 11.70 10.91 6.10 2.40<br />
2. Polyphenols** 714 285 221 210<br />
3. Total carbohydrates** 5620 4002 3187 2400<br />
4. Starch* 60.61 12.38 11.94 12.05<br />
5. Reducing sugars** 253.6 158.26 141.20 039.12<br />
6. Proteins** 417 360 214 166<br />
7. Lipids* 2.244 0.033 0.016 0.011<br />
*g -100 -1 g fresh tissue. **mg 100 -1 g fresh tissue.
72 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
Graph 1. Growth parameters.<br />
application of residues (biomass) of A. curasavica Linn (Table<br />
2) on P. hysterophorus L reflects on biosynthesis of proteins.<br />
The protein content may also get reduced in leaves, stem and<br />
roots. Besides, proteins may be used as respiratory substrate,<br />
when carbohydrates supply was in adequate, due to effect of<br />
allelo chemicals. The protein content get declined may be due<br />
to degradation or inhibition of protein synthesis under the<br />
influence of allelo chemicals (Table 2).<br />
The lipid metabolism was highly modified by the<br />
application of residues of A. curasavica Linn on Parthenium<br />
hysterophorus L (Table 2). After 30 DAS treatment, the lipid<br />
content was highly reduced in leaves, stem and roots. This<br />
may be due degradation or lipid peroxidation or inhibited<br />
synthesis under the influence of allelo chemicals. Thus in all<br />
residues (allelochemicals) influence the growth and<br />
metabolism of Parthenium hysterophorus L, therefore, the<br />
biomass may be used as herbal herbicides for management of<br />
weeds in agriculture.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />
The authors are thankful to Co-ordinator, Department<br />
of Agro chemicals and Pest Management, Shivaji University,<br />
Kolhapur for providing laboratory facilities.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Arnon, D. I. 1949. Copper enzyme in isolated chloroplast, polyphenol<br />
oxidase in Beta Vulgaris., Plant Physiology., 24: 1-15.<br />
Auld, B.A. and Medd, R.W. 1987. Weeds on illustrated botanical guide<br />
to the weeds of Australia: Lnkata Melbourne- Sydney, pp. 255.<br />
Basak, S.L. 1984. Parthenium a big treat to agriculture and health; in<br />
1980’s. Indian Agriculturist., 28: 137-139.<br />
Colton, C.E and Einhelling, F.A. 1980. Allelopathic mechanism of<br />
Velvet leaf (Abutilon theophrasii) on Soya bean. American journal<br />
of Botany, 67: 1407-1413.<br />
Graph 2. Biochemical constituents<br />
Cox, H.E and Pearson, D. 1962. The chemical Analysis of Foods,<br />
Chemical Publishing Co. Inc; New York, pp. 426.<br />
Craig, C.E and Einhelling, F.A. 1980. Allelopathic mechanism of Velvet<br />
leaf on Soya Bean., American Journal of Botany., 67: 1407-142-<br />
13.<br />
Deshpande, A.V. 1993. Studies in phylloidy disease in Parthenium with<br />
respect to Morphology, Plant phenolics and Sesui terpene lactone,<br />
M.phil thesis Shivaji University, Kolhapur. pp. 1-99.<br />
Das, B. and Das, R. 1995. Chemical investigation in Parthenium<br />
hysterophorus L: an Allelopathi plant. Allelopathy. Jounal, 2: 99-<br />
104.<br />
Folin, O. and Denis, W. 1915. A Calorimetric method for determination<br />
of phenols and Phenol derivatives in Urine, Journal of Biological<br />
Chemistry., 22:305-308.<br />
Joshi, S.G. 2000. Medicinal plants Oxford & IBH Publishing Co Pvt.<br />
Ltd., pp. 62.<br />
Gupta, O.P. and Sharma, J.J. 1977. Elpeligro del parthenium enla India<br />
possible Medidas de control del : N Boletin Fistosanitario FAO, 25:<br />
112-117.<br />
Hodge, J.E. and Hofreiter, B.T. 1962. In carbohydrate chemistry 17<br />
(eds. Whistler, R.L. and Be Miller, T.N.). Academic Press, New<br />
Yor k.<br />
Lowry, A.H., Rosenbrough, N.J., Fan, A.L. and Randal, R.J. 1951. Protein<br />
Measurement with folin phenol reagent., Journal of Biological<br />
Chemistry, 193: 265-275.<br />
Miller, G.L. 1972. Anal. Chem., 31: 426.<br />
Nagaraja, T.G. and S.M. Deshmukh. 2009. Phytotoxic effect of<br />
Andrographis paniculata Nees on metabolism of Parthenium<br />
hysterophorus L., Journal of Biopesticides, 2(2): 165-167.<br />
Thapar, R. and Singh, N.B. 2006. Phytotoxic effects of Cassia tora on<br />
growth and Metabolism of Parthenium hysterophorus L., Allelopathy<br />
Journal, 17(2): 235-246.<br />
Thayumanvan, B. and Sadasivam, S. 1984. Qual Plant Foods Hum<br />
Nutr, 34: 253.<br />
Recieved on 17-10-2012 Accepted on 26-01-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 73-75, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Serological Detection and Host Range Studies of Peanut Bud Necrosis Virus Infecting<br />
Tomato<br />
MALLU GOVARDHANA 1 , GOP<strong>IN</strong>ATH, K. 2 , VANITHA, L.S. 3 , ESWAR REDDY MADDI 2 AND<br />
MANJUNATHA, L. 3<br />
1<br />
Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru 560 089, Karnataka,<br />
India, 2 Department of Plant Science, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, 500 046, Andhra Pradesh, India<br />
3<br />
Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru 560 065, Karnataka,<br />
India<br />
e-mail: mrgyadav@gmail.com 1<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Peanut bud necrosis virus (PBNV), a tospovirus has become<br />
serious disease in major tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)<br />
growing areas of the world. The virus was obtained in purest<br />
form from naturally infected tomato sample. The virus was<br />
detected by DAC-ELISA using polyclonal antibodies against<br />
PBNV and TSV. PBNV was succesfully transmitted to Vigna<br />
unguiculata, Nicotiana rustica and Nicotiana benthamiana.<br />
Key words<br />
Lycopersicon esculentum, PBNV, tospovirus, TSV,<br />
ELISA<br />
Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) is an important<br />
vegetable crop next to potato and sweet potato in the world.<br />
In India the largest grower of tomato is Andhra Pradesh,<br />
Karnataka, Bihar, Maharashtra and Orissa. Among various<br />
diseases on tomato, viral diseases are considered one of the<br />
most severe, affecting tomato production in many countries.<br />
There are about 75 viruses which infect tomato causing<br />
significant losses in the sustainable production of tomato<br />
viz., Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), Potato virus X (PVX),<br />
Tomato yellow leaf curl begomovirus (TYLV), Potato virus Y<br />
(PVY) Tomato leaf curl virus (ToLCV) and tospoviruses<br />
(Reddy, et al., 1968).<br />
Peanut bud necrosis disease (PBND) has been described<br />
in India since 1962 by different names: groundnut mosaic,<br />
groundnut rosette, bunchy top, chlorosis, ring mottle, bud<br />
blight and ring mosaic (Reddy, et al., 1991). PBNV virion is<br />
spherical single strand RNA molecule as genetic material, 80-<br />
120 nm in diameter and display surface glycoprotein<br />
projections of 5 to 10 nm, which are embedded in lipid bilayer<br />
of 5-7 nm thickness and derived from host membrane. The<br />
virion has three genome segments, large (L), medium (M), and<br />
small (S). All three genome segments of virus have the same<br />
complementary nucleotides at their 3’ and 5’ termini. The proper<br />
identification and studies on transmission of the virus is a<br />
prerequisite for development of suitable management<br />
strategies in this point of view the present work was undertaken<br />
to investigate on serological detection of PBNV through DAC<br />
ELISA and transmission studies.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Detection of PBNV through DAC ELISA<br />
Serological properties of the virus present in the samples<br />
of naturally infected tomato were determined using DAC-<br />
ELISA with polyclonal antibodies against different viruses<br />
like Tobacco streak virus (TSV), Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV)<br />
and Peanut bud necrosis (PBNV).<br />
DAC-ELISA was used to screen the virus infected<br />
tomato fruit sample by directly coating the antigen (plant sap.)<br />
on the inner walls of the microtitre plate well (Hobbs, et al.,<br />
1987; Mowat and Dawson, 1987). 200 mg of infected fruit<br />
sample was macerated with 500 µl of carbonate buffer 200 µl<br />
of extract was loaded to respective wells of microtiter plate<br />
and kept for 2 hours incubation at room temperature. The<br />
plate was washed with PBS-T buffer with three times at 10<br />
minute interval. 200 µl of respective antisera for positive control<br />
CMV (1:5000), TSV (1:10000) and PBNV (1:10000) was added<br />
and incubated for 2 hours in rocker at room temperature. Plate<br />
was emptied and washed with PBS-T three times at 10 minute<br />
interval and 200 µl of secondary antibody-alkaline<br />
phasphatase conjugate was added to the well and incubated<br />
for 2 hours in rocker at room temperature, plate was washed<br />
with PBS-T three times at 10 minute intervals. Then 200 µl of<br />
the freshly prepared substrate p-nitro phenol phosphate<br />
(PNPP) was added and kept for 1 hour in dark. The reaction<br />
was terminated by adding 50 µl of 3 M NaOH solution in each<br />
well. The positive samples were screened by measuring<br />
absorbance at 405 nm wavelength.<br />
Virus Source<br />
The infected samples of tomato fruits showing chlorotic<br />
ring like symptoms was obtained from field of Andhra Pradesh<br />
Province (Figure 1) found positive for PBNV, CMV and TSV<br />
through DAC-ELISA. The infected tomato samples was<br />
maintained under -20 o C condition for further experimentation.<br />
About 500mg of pulp was taken as a source of virus and<br />
macerated in 1ml of ice cold 20mM phosphate buffer pH 8.0<br />
containing Sodium thioglycolate and beta mercaptoethanol
74 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
under chilled condition.<br />
Mechanical transmission<br />
The host plant Cowpea (C 152) was raised at glass house<br />
condition in plastic pots. The seeds were obtained from IIHR<br />
Bangalore. The 7 days old host plants Cowpea (C 152) were<br />
dusted with celite and mechanicals inoculated with the ice<br />
cold virus inoculum by applying gently on the plant leaf surface<br />
using muslin cloth within one min after preparation of<br />
inoculums and presence of virus was detected by performing<br />
DAC-ELISA.<br />
Host range studies<br />
Chlorotic local lesion that are found on the 13days old<br />
of post inoculated host plants Cowpea (C 152) sample was<br />
macerated using 1ml of ice cold 20mM phosphate buffer<br />
containing 0.025% Sodium thioglycolate. The host plants viz,<br />
Vigna unguiculata (C 152), Nicotiana benthamiana,<br />
Nicotiana rustica, Phaseolus vulgaris and Petunia hybrida<br />
were dusted with celite in order to carry out the mechanical<br />
inoculation using macerated sap, which was applied gently<br />
on the plant leaf surface by muslin cloth. The plants were<br />
maintained at 24 o C in the photo period of 16 hours light and 8<br />
hours dark period. The symptom appearance was observed<br />
daily. After two-three passages, the leaves of C 152 were used<br />
to detect virus by ELISA.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Screening of PBNV from field collected tomato sample by<br />
DAC-ELISA<br />
Primarily DAC-ELISA was performed for the tomato<br />
samples using different PBNV and TSV antisera. The samples<br />
which are reacting positively were identified by visual scoring<br />
and respective ELISA plate was shown with positive result<br />
with PBNV, TSV and Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) antisera<br />
(Figure 3). Among the field samples, 11 samples showed<br />
positive by visual observation (scoring over buffer controls).<br />
Optimization of inoculation buffer and Mechanical<br />
transmission<br />
The 20 mM phosphate buffer containing in the range<br />
0.02%-0.09% of sodium thioglycolate are showed efficient than<br />
the buffer containing -mercaptoethanol infection with<br />
characteristic symptoms of the PBNV in to the susceptible<br />
host plant(C 152). Specifically 0.03% of sodium thioglycolate<br />
are showed more efficient infection than other percentage of<br />
sodium thioglycolate in phosphate buffer (Table 1). But the<br />
control (only phosphate buffer) does not showed any<br />
characteristic symptoms on the host plant (C 152) even after 3<br />
weeks of post inoculation. The cow pea C 152 genotype<br />
exhibited characteristic chlorotic and necrotic local lesion on<br />
the 6 th day after inoculation and positive result for PBNV and<br />
TSV from 4 th day of post inoculation.<br />
Host range studies of the PBNV<br />
The PBNV positive sample subjected to mechanical<br />
inoculation on host plants Vigna ungiculata, Nicotiana<br />
benthamiana, Nicotiana rustica, Petunia hybrida and<br />
Phaseolus vulgaris. was succesfully transmitted to Vigna<br />
unguiculata, Nicotiana rustica and Nicotiana benthamiana,<br />
Inoculated leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana plants initially<br />
showed chlorotic local lesions spreading and resulting in<br />
systemic infection and apparent death of the whole plant<br />
(Figure 2a-c) in a span of two weeks. Cowpea C 152 genotype<br />
exhibited characteristic chlorotic local lesion on the 6 th day of<br />
after mechanical inoculation. These lesions are expanding<br />
throughout the leaf as concentric rings. No senescence was<br />
observed even after 4-5 week of the inoculation.<br />
The Nicotiana rustica plants also showed initially<br />
chlorotic local lesions spreading after 20 days of post<br />
inoculated period, showed stunted growth. The virus was<br />
not transmitted to Phaseolus vulgaris and Petunia hybrida<br />
indicating that these are not hosts for PBNV. The virus was<br />
maintained on cowpea (C 152) and Nicotiana rustica plants<br />
with periodical re-inoculation in the green house with 15 days<br />
interval. The host range studies of PBNV are in conformity<br />
with studies conducted by Reddy, et al., 1991 who studied<br />
Fig. 1.<br />
Fig. 2.<br />
PBNV infected tomato fruit sample showing chlorotic<br />
concentric rings<br />
(a-c) Host range study of peanut bud necrosis virus<br />
(PBNV)<br />
Table 1.<br />
Standardization of inoculation buffer<br />
Control 1µl 2µl<br />
3µl<br />
4µl 5µl 6µl<br />
7µl<br />
8µl 9µl<br />
(0.01%) (0.02%) (0.03%) (0.04%) (0.05%) (0.06%) (0.07%) (0.08%) (0.09%)<br />
- - + +++ ++++ +++ + + + + + +<br />
a) ++++ = Excellent b) +++ = Very Good c) ++ = Good d) + = Fair e) — = Not Good
MALLU et al., Serological detection and host range studies of Peanut bud necrosis virus on tomato 75<br />
was detected through ELISA. ELISA has been used to detect<br />
many plant viruses using either polyclonal or monoclonal<br />
antibodies (Banttari and Hibi, and Saito, 1985).<br />
Fig. 2b) 1. Healthy N.rustica p lant 2. 15days o f po st<br />
inoculation 3. 3 weeks of post inoculation<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />
The authors acknowledge Dr. Varsha Wesley, ICRISAT,<br />
Hyderabad, AP, India and Prof. H. Savithri, IISC, Bangalore,<br />
Karnataka, India, for providing PBNV and TSV antisera.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Fig. 2c) 1. Healthy N.ben thmian a 2. 3 weeks o f po st<br />
inoculation 3. 4 weeks of post inoculation<br />
A1, A2, E1&E2- Blank<br />
A3, A4, E3&E4- positive control (SeMV)<br />
A5to C12- TSV positives<br />
E5 to G2- PBNV positives<br />
SeMV- Sesbania Mosaic Virus<br />
Antiserum-PBNV-NP (1:5000)<br />
Each samples are in duplicates<br />
Fig. 3. Serological detection of PBNV by DAC-ELISA<br />
the diagnosis of viral infections based on symptoms through<br />
sap inoculation to different hosts, Vigna unguiculata,<br />
Nicotiana benthamiana and Nicotiana glutinosa. The virus<br />
Banttari, E.E. and Goodwin, P.H. 1985. Detection of potato viruses S,<br />
X and Y by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on nitrocellulose<br />
membranes (dot-ELISA). Plant Disease, 69: 202-205.<br />
Hibi and Saito. 1985. A Dot Immunobinding Assay for the detection of<br />
Tobacco Mosaic Virus in infected tissue. Journal of General Virology,<br />
66:1191-1194.<br />
Hobbs, H.A., Reddy, D.V.R., Rajeshwari, R. and Reddy, A.S. 1987. Use<br />
of direct antigen coating and protein A coating ELISA procedures<br />
for detection of three peanut viruses. Plant Disease, 71:747-749.<br />
Mowat, W.P. and Dawson, S. 1987. Detection and identification of<br />
plant viruses by ELISA using crude sap extracts and unfractionated<br />
antisera. Journal of Virological Methods, 15(3):233-247.<br />
Reddy, D.V.R., Wightman, J.A., Beshear, R.J., Highland, B., Black, M.,<br />
Sreenivasulu, P., Dwivedi, S.L., Demski, J.W., McDonald, D., Smith,<br />
J.W. and Smith, D.H. 1991. Bud necrosis: a disease of groundnut<br />
caused by tomato spotted wilt virus. Patancheru 502324, Andhra<br />
Pradesh, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-<br />
Arid Tropics. Information Bulletin no. 31.<br />
Reddy, M., Reddy, D.V.R. and Appa Rao, A. 1968. A new record of virus<br />
disease on peanut. Plant Disease Reporter, 52:494-495.<br />
Recieved on 07-01-<strong>2013</strong> Accepted on 15-02-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 76-77, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Influence of Genotypes on Consumability of the Leaves, Growth and Development<br />
of Spodoptera litura (Fab.)<br />
PRADYUMN S<strong>IN</strong>GH, N.S. BHADAURIA AND POOJA CHAUHAN<br />
Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Gwalior 474 002 M.P., India<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Experiments on influence of genotypes on consumability of<br />
the leaves, growth and development of Spodoptera litura (Fab.)<br />
were conducted during Kharif, 2008-09 and 2009-10 at College<br />
of Agriculture, Gwalior. On the basis of weight and size of<br />
larvae, larval and pupal period and growth rate genotype TJM<br />
12 showed antibiosis mechanism of resistant against pest. On<br />
the basis of consumption of leaves and consumption index<br />
genotypes TJM 15 and TJM 12 showed antifeedant affect<br />
against tobacco caterpillar. Whereas genotypes MI 24-91 and<br />
MI 181-1 showed highly susceptibility on the basis of<br />
consumability of leaves.<br />
Key words<br />
Tobacco caterpillar, Spodoptera litura, Mungbean<br />
genotypes<br />
The tobacco caterpillar, Spodoptera litura (Fab.) is a<br />
polyphagus insect and in recent years it is causing serious<br />
losses to pulses and oilseed crops in Madhya Pradesh during<br />
Kharif season.<br />
Mungbean is a low economic return crop and grown by<br />
poor farmers and use of recommended insecticides for the<br />
control of insect pest, so for are uneconomical. The<br />
management of pest, with insecticides is not also very effective<br />
due to difficulty in their application during rainy season.<br />
Insecticides also cause environmental pollutions, hazard to<br />
non target species, pest resurgence, secondary pest out break<br />
residue problem etc. Hence the use of insect resistant varieties<br />
is important remedies for management of tobacco caterpillar.<br />
They are stable and economically sound approaches to<br />
minimize the damage caused by Spodoptera litura (Fab).<br />
Therefore the present investigations were conducted to find<br />
out the influence of genotypes on consumption and growth<br />
of the pest.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
The present studies attempt to know the influence of<br />
mungbean genotypes and effect on consumability of leaves<br />
by the larvae and effect on growth and development of tobacco<br />
caterpillar, Spodoptera litura (Fab.) were carried out during<br />
Kharif season of 2008-09 and 09-10 in the Department of<br />
Entomology, College of Agriculture, Gwalior.<br />
Fifteen genotypes of mungbean viz, TJM 12, TJM 15,<br />
TJM 47, TJM 59, TJM 65, TJM 234, TJM 268, TM 98-50, TM<br />
99-58, TM 99-37, MI 24-91, MI 181-1, TARM 18, HUM 1 and K<br />
851 were grown in the plot size of 15.0 m 2 each with normal<br />
agronomical practices. The experiment was replicated three<br />
times. The leaves of each genotypes were picked up from the<br />
field and kept in petridishes after recording their weight with<br />
the help of electronic balance. The two first instar larvae were<br />
released in each petridish. The observation on weight of<br />
consumed leaves in each genotype was recorded at the time<br />
of changing the leaves. Fresh leaves were provided in two<br />
days interval starting from their release. Larval weight was<br />
recorded at 4, 8, 12 and 16 days after their released. The data<br />
on larval period, length of full grown larvae, pupal period and<br />
weight of pupae and adults were also recorded. Total leaves<br />
weight consumed by the larva, consumption index (C.I.),<br />
growth rate (G.R.), efficiency of conversion of ingested food<br />
(ECI) and digestibility were also calculated as per method<br />
suggested by Waldbauer, 1968.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Observation recorded on weight of leaves consumed<br />
by larvae showed that the tested genotypes influence the<br />
consumption of leaves significantly (Table 1). Minimum<br />
consumption of leaves (7.680 g) was recorded in genotype<br />
TJM 15 which found significantly less than rest of the<br />
genotype, except TJM 12, TM 99-58, TJM 65, TM 98-50, TJM<br />
47 and K 851. On the other hand significantly higher<br />
consumption of leaves (10.180 g) was recorded in genotypes<br />
MI 24-91 which found significantly higher than rest of the<br />
genotypes except MI 181-1. Bhadauria, et al., 1998 and Saha,<br />
2005 also reported non-preference mechanism of resistance<br />
in soybean varieties against tobacco caterpillar.<br />
The weight gained by larvae reared on different<br />
genotypes was also significantly influenced by different<br />
genotypes. It ranged from 0.358 g in genotypes TJM 12 to<br />
0.815 g in genotypes TM 99-37. The minimum weight gained<br />
by larvae was recorded in genotypes TJM 12, which indicates<br />
the presence of antibiosis mechanism of resistance in the<br />
genotypes, TJM 12 which influence the growth of the larvae.<br />
The larval period of larvae fed on different genotypes of<br />
mungbean was differed significantly. The maximum larval<br />
period (23.0 days) was recorded in genotypes TJM 12 which<br />
found significantly higher than rest of the genotypes, expect<br />
TJM 99-58, TJM 65, TJM 59, TJM 15 and TM 98-50. Whereas<br />
the minimum larval period (16.0 days) was recorded in<br />
genotypes MI 181-1, which found significantly less than rest<br />
of genotypes expect TJM 234, MI 24-91 and TM 99-37.<br />
The larval length was also significantly influenced by<br />
different genotypes. It ranged from 2.70 cm in genotype TJM<br />
12 to 3.70 cm in genotype TARM 18. The minimum length of<br />
larvae was recorded on genotype TJM 12 followed by<br />
genotype TJM 15, which also indicates the influence of these
Table 1.<br />
S.N.<br />
S<strong>IN</strong>GH et al., Influence of Varieties on Consumability of the Leaves, Growth and Development of Spodoptera litura (Fab.) 77<br />
Effect of the mungbean genotypes on the growth and development of S. litura (Fab.)<br />
Genotypes<br />
Weight of leaves consumed (g) Larval weight<br />
by larvae at<br />
(g)<br />
16 Days after release<br />
ECI-Efficiency of conversion of ingested food *Angular transformed values.<br />
Table 2. Effect of the mungbean genotypes on consumption, growth rate, ECI and approximate digestibility of S. litura (Fab.)<br />
genotypes on growth of larvae significantly. Whereas<br />
maximum length of larvae was recorded on genotypes TARM<br />
18.<br />
The pupal period were also influenced significantly by<br />
different genotypes of mungbean. It ranged from 7.0 to 10.0<br />
days, respectively. Maximum pupal period recorded in<br />
genotype TJM 12 showed their antibiosis effect against the<br />
pest.<br />
The data computed on consumption index (C.I.), growth<br />
rate (G.R.) efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI) and<br />
approximate digestibility (A.D.) also showed significant<br />
influence of different genotypes on consumability, digestibility<br />
and growth rate of pest (Table 2).<br />
The minimum consumption index (C.I.) of larvae<br />
recorded in TJM 15 followed by genotype TJM 12 indicated<br />
that this genotype influenced the consumability of leaves<br />
due to their anti-feedancy to the pest. The minimum value of<br />
Length of larvae<br />
(cm)<br />
growth rate efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI)<br />
and approximate digestibility (A.D.) in genotypes TJM 12<br />
showed their significant influence on digestibility of food and<br />
growth rate may be due to presence of antibiosis mechanism<br />
of resistance. The G.R., ECI and A.D. in different genotypes<br />
were ranged from 0.032 (TJM 12) to 0.075 (TM 99-37), 0.046<br />
(TJM 12) to 0.094 (TM 99-58), 40.04 (TJM 12) to 61.71 (TM 99-<br />
37).<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Larval period in<br />
days<br />
Pupal Period<br />
in days<br />
1. TJM 12 7.710 0.358 2.66 23.0 10.0<br />
2. TJM 15 7.680 0.649 2.90 21.6 7.3<br />
3. TJM 47 8.117 0.698 3.38 20.3 8.0<br />
4. TJM 59 8.377 0.623 3.30 21.6 7.6<br />
5. TJM 65 7.787 0.603 3.03 21.6 8.6<br />
6. TJM 234 9.370 0.745 3.36 16.3 7.6<br />
7. TJM 268 8.893 0.661 3.23 19.0 7.3<br />
8. TJM 98-50 7.950 0.605 3.16 20.6 8.3<br />
9. TJM 99-58 7.730 0.732 3.25 22.0 7.6<br />
10. TJM 99-37 8.757 0.815 3.43 17.6 7.0<br />
11. MI 24-91 10.180 0.721 3.40 17.3 7.3<br />
12. MI 181-1 10.127 0.649 3.50 16.0 8.3<br />
13. TARM 18 9.187 0.810 3.70 19.6 9.0<br />
14. HUM 1 8.693 0.767 3.40 19.6 8.0<br />
15. K 851 8.143 0.706 3.60 19.0 8.0<br />
S.Em(±) 0.193 0.057 0.11 0.8 0.4<br />
CD at 5% 0.558 0.165 0.32 2.4 1.2<br />
S.N. Genotypes Consumption index<br />
(C.I.)<br />
Growth rate of larvae<br />
(G.R.)<br />
Efficiency of conversion of<br />
ingested food (E.C.I.)<br />
Approximate<br />
Digestibility (%)<br />
1. TJM 12 0.712 0.032 0.046 41.3 (40.04)*<br />
2. TJM 15 0.710 0.059 0.084 44.5 (41.85)<br />
3. TJM 47 0.750 0.064 0.085 58.9 (50.16)<br />
4. TJM 59 0.774 0.057 0.074 55.2 (48.03)<br />
5. TJM 65 0.719 0.055 0.077 47.4 (43.54)<br />
6. TJM 234 0.866 0.068 0.079 57.5 (49.33)<br />
7. TJM 268 0.821 0.061 0.074 56.5 (48.73)<br />
8. TJM 98-50 0.734 0.056 0.076 50.1 (45.05)<br />
9. TJM 99-58 0.714 0.067 0.094 75.9 (60.66)<br />
10. TJM 99-37 0.809 0.075 0.092 77.5 (61.71)<br />
11. MI 24-91 0.941 0.066 0.070 80.3 (63.69)<br />
12. MI 181-1 0.936 0.060 0.064 64.2 (53.28)<br />
13. TARM 18 0.849 0.074 0.088 71.4 (57.72)<br />
14. HUM 1 0.803 0.070 0.087 66.9 (54.90)<br />
15. K 851 0.752 0.065 0.086 61.2 (51.48)<br />
S.Em(±) 0.018 0.006 0.006 0.72<br />
CD at 5% 0.052 0.016 0.017 2.10<br />
ECI-Efficiency of conversion of ingested food<br />
*Angular transformed values.<br />
Bhadauria, N.K.S., Bhadauria, N.S. and Jakhmola, S.S. 1998. Reaction<br />
of soybean varieties of bihar hairy cater pillar, Spilosoma obliqua.<br />
Indian J. Ento., 60(4):419-421.<br />
Saha, Lopamudra 2005. Reaction of soybean varieties against tobacco<br />
caterpillar, Spodoptera litura (Fabricious). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis<br />
J.N.K.V.V., Jabalpur (M.P.)<br />
Waldbauer, G.P. 1968. The consumption and utilization of food by<br />
insects. Advances in Insect Physiology, 5:229-283.<br />
Recieved on 06-09-2012 Accepted on 15-01-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 78-79, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Diversity Pattern of Beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera) In and Around the Historic<br />
Joysagar Tank of Assam, India<br />
I. RAHMAN 1 , C. SONOWAL AND M. NATH<br />
Department of Zoology, Sibsagar College, Joysagar 786 665, Assam, India<br />
email: imdadur123@rediffmail.com 1<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
In the present study 10 species of beetles belonging to 8 different<br />
families viz., Dytiscidae, Gyrinidae, Carabidae, Hydrophilidae,<br />
Chrysomelidae, Cocc inellida e, Cerambycidae and<br />
Tenebrionidae were collected and identified in and around the<br />
Joysagar Tank of the Sivasagar District, Assam. Dytiscidae<br />
was the predominant family with respect to number and<br />
abundance.<br />
Key words<br />
Coleoptera, Beetles, Insecta, Joysagar Tank<br />
The order Coleoptera or beetles forms the largest group<br />
of insects worldwide with about 3,70,000 described species.<br />
India being situated in tropics is well known for richness of<br />
coleopteran fauna. Beetles are found in almost every habitat<br />
and the size varies considerably. The smallest beetle Nanosella<br />
fungi from South and Central America, hardly measures 0.25<br />
mm long, while some of the large species often exceed 150 mm<br />
(Mani, 1994). About 15,088 species of coleopteran insects are<br />
known from Indian region (Kazmi and Ramamurty, 2004). The<br />
most important factor in the success of coleopterans is the<br />
development of forewings into hardened protective covering<br />
(elytra). Beetles are of variable shape and colour having<br />
chewing mouthparts belonging to different families. Some<br />
species have reduced wings (Arnett, 1973). Beetles are<br />
exceedingly variable both ecologically and biologically. Some<br />
Beetle species are extremely harmful while others have proven<br />
beneficial. If the beetle population is healthy in certain complex<br />
biological environments, we may gauge that the environment<br />
is also healthy.<br />
The study of coleopteran diversity in and around the<br />
Joysagar tank of the Sivasagar District, Assam is lacking<br />
completely. Therefore, in the present study an effort was made<br />
to study the diversity pattern of beetles in this area.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Study area: The study was conducted at monthly interval<br />
from May, 2011 to April, 2012 at different zones of Joysagar<br />
tank. The tank is situated at 5 km distance from Sivasagar<br />
town. It lies between 26° 56' 97'’ and 26° 57' 32'’ N; 94° 37' 38'’<br />
and 94° 37' 54'’ E and adjacent to Joy Dole. Joysagar tank is<br />
the largest man made tank in Asia, built by Ahom King Rudra<br />
Singha during 1696-1714 AD. It comprises an area of 318 acres<br />
including four banks. Its water level stays at 14 feet higher<br />
than ground level. This tank supports diverse flora and fauna.<br />
The study area was divided into four different habitat zones.<br />
Zone I - Area containing the men made building.<br />
Zone II - Dry with shrubs.<br />
Zone III - Area with man made garden and poultry farm.<br />
Zone IV - The area containing water bodies.<br />
Collection and identification of beetles: Beetles were collected<br />
from different habitats by using different collecting and<br />
trapping methods. Most beetles were collected by hand and<br />
with the help of forceps. Insect nets were employed for<br />
catching flying beetles. Water beetles were collected from<br />
four sites at four corners of the tank with the help of aquatic<br />
insect nets. Some beetles were collected during night with the<br />
help of light traps using light. The collected specimens were<br />
brought to the laboratory, pinned and identified with the help<br />
of standard identification manuals and published literatures.<br />
The collected water beetles were preserved in 4%<br />
formaldehyde. The specimens were identified with the help of<br />
available literature (Forey and Fitzsimons, 2007; Castner, 2008).<br />
Relative abundance (%) and dominance status were also<br />
determined.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
A total ten species of beetles were recorded during the<br />
present study. The checklist of beetles, their habitat is given<br />
in Table 1. These belong to 8 different families viz., Dytiscidae<br />
(Predaceous Diving Beetles), Gyrinidae (Whirligig Beetles),<br />
Carabidae (Ground Beetles), Hydrophilidae (Water Scavenger<br />
Beetles), Chrysomelidae (Leaf Beetles), Coccinellidae<br />
(Ladybird Beetles), Cerambycidae (Long-Horned Beetles) and<br />
Tenebrionidae (Darkling Beetles). Dytiscidae was the most<br />
common family quantitatively representing 43.29% of the total<br />
beetles in and around the Joysagar Tank. In the present study,<br />
three aquatic beetle species belonging to three different<br />
families viz., Dytiscidae, Gyrinidae and Hydrophilidae were<br />
recorded. In a man made pond Jana, et al., 2009 reported that<br />
order Odonata was the most common aquatic insect than order<br />
Coleoptera and order Hemiptera. Khan and Ghosh, 2001 in<br />
West Bengal and Sharma and Rai, 1991 in Bhagalpur, Bihar<br />
found Coleoptera to be the most common order quantitatively.<br />
Species diversity was found maximum in Zone III and<br />
minimum in Zone I. Zone II and Zone III were similar and other<br />
Zones were dissimilar in faunal composition which may due<br />
to presence of similar and dissimilar vegetation in that<br />
particular zone.<br />
The relative abundance of different beetle families
Table 1.<br />
RAHMAN, et al., Diversity pattern of beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera) in and around the historic Joysagar Tank of Assam, India 79<br />
Checklist of beetles and their habitat in and around the Joysagar Tank of the Sivasagar District, Assam.<br />
Suborder/Family/ Genus Occurrence Number Relative Abundance (RA) % *Dominance Status<br />
Suborder: Adephaga<br />
Family: Dytiscidae<br />
Eretes sticticus Zone IV 210 43.29 Eudominant<br />
Family: Gyrinidae<br />
Dineutus indicus Zone IV 143 29.48 Dominant<br />
Family: Carabidae<br />
Anthia sexguttata Zone II, III 11 2.26 Recedent<br />
Suborder: Polyphaga<br />
Family: Hydrophilidae<br />
Hydrophilus olivaceous Zone IV 56 11.54 Dominant<br />
Family: Chrysomelidae<br />
Dicladispa armigera<br />
Leptispa pygmaea Baly.<br />
Family: Coccinellidae<br />
Menochilus sexaculatus<br />
Epilachna dodecastigma<br />
Zone III<br />
Zone II, III<br />
Zone II, III<br />
Zone II, III<br />
*RA 31.7% = Eudominant<br />
8<br />
12<br />
11<br />
14<br />
1.65<br />
2.47<br />
2.26<br />
2.88<br />
Recedent<br />
Recedent<br />
Recedent<br />
Recedent<br />
Family: Cerambycidae<br />
Batocera rufomaculata Zone I 16 3.29 Subdominant<br />
Family: Tenebrionidae<br />
Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) Zone I, III 4 0.82 Subrecedent<br />
recorded in the study area is given in Fig. 1. Dytiscidae was<br />
numerically the most common family of beetles. Family<br />
Tenebrionidae was represented by only 1%. Out of the 18<br />
families of aquatic Coleoptera known from the world<br />
representative of 5 families namely Dytiscidae, Gyrinidae and<br />
Hydrophilidae, Haliplidae, and Elmidae are chiefly represented<br />
in the India (Deepa and Rao, 2010). Coleoptera belonging to<br />
40 taxa in 7 families of streams in the Nizke Beskydy Region<br />
(Slovakia) were studied (Zatovicova, et al., 2004). A total of 12<br />
species belonging to 5 different families of beetles viz.,<br />
Gyrinidae, Tenebrionidae, Carabidae, Scarabaeidae and<br />
Meloidae were recorded from the vicinity of Semadoh-Makhala<br />
Road, Sipna Range, and Melghat Tiger Reserve (Thakare and<br />
Zade, 2012).<br />
Fig. 1.<br />
Relative abundance (%) of the families of beetles<br />
in and around the Joysagar Tank of the families of<br />
beetles in and around the Joysagar Tank of the<br />
Sivasagar District, Assam.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />
The authors are grateful to the Head, Department of<br />
Zoology, Sibsagar College for providing laboratory facilities.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Arnett, R.H. 1973. Beetles of the U.S.A. Manual for identification,<br />
American Entomological Institute, Ann Arbar MI.<br />
Castner, J.L. 2008. Photographic Atlas of Entomology and Guide to<br />
Insect Identification Published by Feline Press, USA.<br />
Deepa J. and Rao, C.A.N. 2010. Aquatic Entomofauna of Pocharam<br />
lake, Andhra Pradesh (Hemiptera & Coleoptera), Wetland ecosystem<br />
series, Rec. Zool. Surv. India, Kolkata, 13: 37-49.<br />
Forey, P. and Fitzsimons, C. 2007. Identification guides-European<br />
Insects, Flame Tree Publishing, London, pp. 194-283.<br />
Jana, S., Pahari, P., Dutta, T. and Bhattacharya, T. 2009. Diversity and<br />
community structure of aquatic insects in a pond in Midnapore<br />
town, West Bengal, India. J. Environ. Biol., 30(2): 283-287.<br />
Kazmi, S.I. and Ramamurthy, V.V. 2004. Coleoptera (Insecta) fauna<br />
from the Indian Thar Desert. Rajasthan. Zoos’ Print Journal, 19(4):<br />
1447-1448.<br />
Khan, R.A. and Ghosh, L.K. 2001. Faunal diversity of aquatic insects in<br />
freshwater wetlands of South Eastern West Bengal. Z.S.I. Kolkata.<br />
Mani, M.S. 1994. General Entomology. 3 rd edition, Published by Mohan<br />
Primlani for Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi-<br />
01.<br />
Sharma, U.P. and Rai, D.N. 1991. Seasonal Variations and species<br />
diversity of coleopteran insects in a fish pond of Bhagalpur. Journal<br />
of Freshwater Biology, 3: 241-246.<br />
Thakare, V.G. and Zade, V.S. 2012. Diversity of Beetles (Insecta:<br />
Coleoptera) from the vicinity of Semadoh-Makhala Road, Sipna<br />
Range, and Melghat Tiger Reserve, (M.S.) India. Bioscience<br />
Discovery, 3(1):112-115.<br />
Zatovicova, Z., Ciampor, F. and Kodada, J. 2004. Aquatic Coleoptera<br />
(Insecta) of streams in the Nizke Beskydy Region (Slovakia):<br />
faunistics, ecology and comparison of sampling methods. Biologia,<br />
15: 181-189.<br />
Recieved on 30-12-2012 Accepted on 15-02-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 80-81, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Effect of Ginger and Mint Extract on Microflora of Yoghurt Culture<br />
D<strong>IN</strong>KER S<strong>IN</strong>GH 1 AND SWASHANKH KUMAR<br />
Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University,<br />
Varanasi 221 005, U.P., India<br />
e-mail: dinker.bhu@gmail.com 1<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
The present research was conducted to study the effect of Ginger<br />
and Mint extract on the viability of yoghurt culture. The product<br />
was fermented with traditional yoghurt culture (Streptococcus<br />
salivarius Thermophilus sp., Lactobacillus delbrueckii,<br />
Bulgaricus,) and formulated with different levels of Ginger<br />
and Mint extract at 0 .5%, 1.0 %, 1.5% and 2.0% for<br />
experimental treatment T 1<br />
, T 2<br />
, T 3<br />
and T 4<br />
respectively with 10 0<br />
Brix. On the basis of selective enumeration, Ginger and Mint<br />
extract with the level of 1.5% in yoghurt has maximum viable<br />
count (cfu/g) followed by 1.0%, 2.0% and 0.5%.<br />
Key words<br />
Yoghurt, Herbal Extract, Yoghurt Cultures and Viable<br />
Count (cfu/g)<br />
Globally, yoghurt is one of the most popular fermented<br />
milk products and has gained widespread consumer<br />
acceptance as a healthy food due to its therapeutic properties<br />
beside its high nutritive value (Singh, <strong>2013</strong>). Yoghurt contains<br />
substantial amounts of live lactic acid bacteria (Ghosh and<br />
Raymond, 2003). Gilliland, 1979, reported that yoghurt can<br />
inhibit the growth of certain types of tumor. Yoghurt contains<br />
substantial amounts of live lactic acid bacteria (Ghosh and<br />
Raymond, 2003) and showed the health benefits for certain<br />
gastrointestinal conditions, including lactose intolerance,<br />
constipation, diarrheal diseases, colon cancer, inflammatory<br />
bowel disease, Helicobacter pylori infection, and allergies<br />
(Adolfsson, et al., 2004).<br />
In the present scenario, the herbal products are gaining<br />
more popularity over synthetic products in the world market.<br />
This is occurring due to some side effect of synthetic products<br />
on the body (Amirdivani, 2008). In spite of well-practiced<br />
knowledge of herbal medicines and occurrence of a large<br />
number of medicinal plants, the share of India in the global<br />
market is not up to the mark (Rajkumar, 2009).<br />
Ginger (Zingiber officinale) has beneficial effects on<br />
the digestive system, enhancing gastrointestinal motility, and<br />
is used traditionally for the treatment of stomach ache,<br />
vomiting and indigestion (Yamahara, et al., 1990).<br />
Mint (Mentha arvensis) isused to increase the flow of<br />
digestive juices and bile while relaxing the muscles of the<br />
digestive tract. Mint is also used to tone the stomach, stimulate<br />
the mind and body, rid the intestines of gas, and relieve muscle<br />
spasms (Ingham, et al., 1995).<br />
The objective of the present study was to assess the<br />
viability of yoghurt culture with best level of above herbal<br />
extract for the preparation of improved herbal yoghurt.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Yoghurt Culture (Streptococcus salivarius Thermophilus<br />
NCDC 074 and Lactobacillus delbrueckii Bulgaricus NCDC<br />
009) were obtained from National Collection of Dairy Culture<br />
(NCDC), Dairy Microbiology Divisionat NDRI Karnal, Haryna,<br />
India.<br />
Herbs (Ginger and Mint) were obtained from the local market<br />
in Allahabad, U.P., India.<br />
Selection of Herbal Extract<br />
Herbs viz., Ginger and Mint extract of 10 0 brix were<br />
selected to enhanced the viability of yoghurt culture by the<br />
application of Disc Diffusion method (Baur, et al., 1966).<br />
Procedure Adopted for Manufacturing Frozen Yoghurt<br />
Both control (T 0<br />
) and experimental (T 1<br />
,T 2<br />
,T 3<br />
and T 4<br />
)<br />
frozen yoghurt mix were standardized to 5.0 % fat, 8.7% serum<br />
solids, 12% sugar, stabilizer and emulsifier 0.5% and total solids<br />
adjusted to 26%. Herbal extract (10 0 brix) was added at 0.0%,<br />
0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5% and 2.0% for treatments T 0<br />
, T 1<br />
, T 2<br />
, T 3<br />
and T 4<br />
respectively.<br />
The mix was homogenized and then pasteurized and<br />
cooled to 42 o C and yoghurt starter culture was added at 2.5%<br />
(1:1 ratio). The mix was incubated at 42 o C till we achieve an<br />
acidity of 0.45%. Before the mix is aged at 5 o C and frozen in a<br />
batch freezer to an overrun of 70%. The yoghurt was filled in<br />
cups and stored at refrigerated temperature.<br />
Analysis of Yoghurt Culture<br />
Selective enumerations of yoghurt culture<br />
(Streptococcus salivarius Thermophilus NCDC 074,<br />
Lactobacillus delbrueckii Bulgaricus NCDC 009) were done.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The highest mean selective enumeration (10 7 cfu/g) of<br />
Streptococcus Thermophilus scorewas 60 in group T 3<br />
followed<br />
by 35, 22, 6.6 and 2.1 in groups T 2<br />
, T 4<br />
, T 1<br />
and T 0<br />
respectively<br />
(Fig. 1). The differences in the values were significant (P<<br />
0.05), except groups T 0<br />
-T 1<br />
.<br />
The highest mean selective enumeration (10 7 cfu/g) of<br />
Lactobacillus, Bulgaricusscore was 26.9in group T 3<br />
followed<br />
by 18.3, 14.7, 13.8 and 2.5in groups T 2<br />
, T 4<br />
, T 1<br />
and T 0<br />
respectively (Fig.1). The differences in the values were
S<strong>IN</strong>GH AND KUMAR, Effect of Ginger and Mint extract on Microflora of yoghurt culture 81<br />
significant (P< 0.05), except groups T 1<br />
-T 4<br />
, and T 2<br />
-T 4<br />
.<br />
The highest mean selective enumeration(10 7 cfu/g) of<br />
sum of yoghurt culture (Lactobacillus, Bulgaricus+<br />
Streptococcus, Thermophilus) count was 89.8 in group T 3<br />
followed by 53.3, 36.7, 20.4 and 4.6 in groups T 2<br />
, T 4<br />
, T 1<br />
and T 0<br />
respectively (Fig. 2). The differences in the values were<br />
significant (P< 0.05).<br />
Rajkumar, 2009, reported that ginger extract and honey<br />
with cryoprotective agent (Glycerol) enhanced the viable cell<br />
count of frozen yoghurt. There is an adverse effect on total<br />
viable count of frozen yoghurt culture during storage due to<br />
death of cells (Donkor, et al., 2006; Singh, 2009). By analysing<br />
different levels of herbal extract we have found that viable<br />
count of frozen yoghurt was enhanced by the use of herbal<br />
extract.<br />
Singh, 2009, suggested that herbal extract (Ajowan,<br />
Cardamom, Garlic and Mint) enhances the growth of yoghurt<br />
culture. During storage the death of yoghurt culture was found<br />
non-significant and herbal extract can be recommended as<br />
growth promoter (Heenan, et al., 2004; Rajkumar, 2009; Radhika,<br />
2010) for the yoghurt culture.<br />
Chowdhury, et al., 2008, prepared yoghurt with tulsi<br />
leaf (Ocimum sanctum), pudina leaf (Mint, Mentha arvensis)<br />
and coriander leaf (Coriandrum sativum) based. Tulsi yogurt<br />
had the maximum b-galactosidase activity than other herbal<br />
yoghurt.<br />
By analysing different levels of Ginger and Mint extract<br />
we found that viable count of yoghurt cultures i.e.<br />
Streptococcus salivarius Thermophilus NCDC 074 and<br />
Lactobacillus delbrueckii Bulgaricus NCDC 009 was highest<br />
for treatment containing 1.5% (T 3<br />
) herbal extract followed by<br />
Fig. 1. Selective Enumeration of Yoghurt Culture (10 7 cfu/g)<br />
Fig. 2. Sum of viable count of yoghurt culture.<br />
1.0% (T 2<br />
), 2.0% (T 4<br />
) and 0.5% (T 1<br />
) in yoghurt. The Ginger and<br />
Mint extract increases the growth of yoghurt culture and we<br />
recommend that herbal extract can be used as growth promoter<br />
for yoghurt culture.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Adolfsson, O., Meydani, S.N. and Russell, R.M. 2004. Yogurt and gut<br />
function, American J. Clinical Nutrition, 80:245-56.<br />
Amirdivani, S. 2008. Inclusion of MenthapiperitaAnethumgraveolence<br />
and Ocimumbasilicumin Yogurt and their effect on the Inhibition<br />
of Enzyme Relevant to Hypertension and type-2 Diabetes.M. Sc.<br />
Thesis, Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Biological Science,<br />
University of Malaya 50603.<br />
Bauer, A.W., Kirby, W.M., Sherris, J.C. and Turck, M. 1966. Antibiotic<br />
susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. American<br />
J. Clinical Pathology. 45:493-496.<br />
Chowdhury, B.R., Chakraborty, R. and Raychaudhuri, U. 2008. Study<br />
on b-galactosidase enzymatic activity of herbal yogurt. Int. J. Food<br />
Sci Nutr., 59(2): 116-22.<br />
Donkor, O.N., Henriksson, A., Vasiljevic, T. and Shah, N.P. 2006.<br />
Effect of acidification on the activity of probiotics in yoghurt<br />
during cold storage. Int. Dairy J., 16(10): 1181-1189.<br />
Ghosh, S. and Raymond, J.P. 2003. Bioactive natural compounds for<br />
the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders. Clinical Science, 10(4):<br />
547-556.<br />
Gilliland, S.E. 1979. Beneficial interrelationships between certain<br />
microorganisms and humans: candidate microorganisms for use as<br />
dietary adjuncts. J. Food Protection, 42:164.<br />
Heenan, C.N., Adams, M.C., Hosken, R.W. and Fleet, G.H. 2004. Survival<br />
and sensory acceptability of probiotic microorganisms in a<br />
nonfermented frozen vegetarian dessert. Food Sci. and Tech., 37(4):<br />
461-466.<br />
Ingham, K.E., Linforth, R.S.T. and Andrew, J.T. 1995. The effect of<br />
eating on the rate of aroma release from mint-flavoured sweets.<br />
Food Sci. Tech., 28(1): 105-110.<br />
Radhika. 2010. Study of herbal based probiotic yoghurt. M.Sc. Thesis.<br />
Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Raja Balwant Singh<br />
College, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India.<br />
Rajkumar, B. 2009. Efficacy of growth factor (Ginger extract & honey)<br />
and cryoprotective agent (Glycerol) on viable cell count of frozen<br />
yoghurt. M. Tech Thesis. College of Food and Dairy Technology,<br />
Allahabad Agricultural Institute-Deemed University, Allahabad,<br />
Uttar Pradesh, India.<br />
Singh, J. <strong>2013</strong>. Technological and nutritional view of yoghurt.IBDC<br />
Publishers, Lucknow.<br />
Singh, R. 2009. Study of herbal extract on viability of yoghurt culture<br />
during storage. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr., 61(2): 112-26.<br />
Yamahara, J., Huang, Q., Li, Y., Xu, L. and Fujimura, H. 1990.<br />
Gastrointestinal Motility Enhancing Effect of Ginger and its Active<br />
Constituents, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 38(2):430-1.<br />
Yamahara, J., Mochizwki, M., Huang, Q.R., Matsuda, H. and Fujimura,<br />
H. 1988. The anti-ulcer effect in rats of ginger constituents. J.<br />
Ethnopharmacology, 23(2-3): 299-304.<br />
Recieved on 15-01-<strong>2013</strong> Accepted on 18-02-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 82-85, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Anti-Fungal Evaluation of Calotropis Leaf Extract against Some Plant Pathogenic<br />
Fungi<br />
RAJNI S<strong>IN</strong>GH SASODE 1 AND PRADYUMN S<strong>IN</strong>GH<br />
Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Gwalior, M.P.<br />
Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Gwalior, M.P.<br />
e-mail: rnikum_ujjain@yahoo.co.in 1<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Four forms of Calotropis leaf extracts viz.,crude (10%), powder<br />
(10%), boil (10%) and ethanol (1%) were screened for antifungal<br />
activity against ten test fungal pathogens by poisoned food<br />
technique. All the form significantly inhibited the growth of<br />
the test fungus. The antifungal activity of boil extract @ 10%<br />
was found more effective than powder, crude and ethanol<br />
extracts against seven fungal pathogens viz. Fusarium<br />
oxysporum f.sp. ciceri, Rhizoctonia solani, R. bataticola,<br />
Colletotrichum gleosporioides, Tolyposporium penicillariae,<br />
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum ad Phoma sorghina. For the control of<br />
Fusarium oxysporium f.sp. pallidoroseum, and Sclerotium rolfsii,<br />
the powdered form of Calotropis leaf extract was found more<br />
effective. It was observed that the effectivity of boiled, powdered<br />
and ethanol extract against the respective pathogenic fungi<br />
was gradually increased with the increase in the concentration<br />
from 5 to 20%. They are further compared with chemicals viz.,<br />
carbendazim (0.1%) and mancozeb (0.2%), it was observed that<br />
both the chemicals were found more effective than the Calotropis<br />
leaf extract (boiled/crude/powder/ethanol). Therefore higher<br />
concentration of different forms of Calotropis leaf extract should<br />
be tested under in vitro condition and the effective one may<br />
also be tested in the field as an alternative to the chemical for<br />
the eco-friendly management of the disease.<br />
Key words<br />
Leaf, boiled, powdered and ethanol extracts, test<br />
pathogen, chemicals, antifungal activity.<br />
Calotropis procera (Ait.) R.Br. commonly known, as<br />
‘Arka’ is a popular medicinal plant found throughout the<br />
tropics of Asia and Africa covering the arid to semiarid regions<br />
of the Caribbean, Central America, South America, Africa, India<br />
and Israel. It is a woody, broadly evergreen shrub (2 m or less,<br />
sometimes 5 m tall), belongs to family Asclepiadaceae. It<br />
contains active ingredients such as alkaloids, enzymes and<br />
other inorganic elements. Botanicals are gaining importance<br />
in crop protection in view of their selective properties, low<br />
cost and safety to ecosystem. Many botanicals have been<br />
identified to be effective in the control of plant diseases.<br />
Among the 5280 species tested, 1134, 346 and 92 plant species<br />
possessed insecticidal, fungicidal and bactericidal properties<br />
respectively (Ahmed and Grainge, 1982). Plant extracts and<br />
essential oils are known to prossess antifungal activity against<br />
a wide range of fungi (Grane and Ahmad, 1988, Wilson, et al.,<br />
1997 and Abd-Alla, et al., 2001). Plant metabolites and plant<br />
based pesticides appear to be one of the better alternatives as<br />
they are known to have minimal environmental impact and<br />
danger to consumer in contrast to synthetic pesticides (Verma<br />
and Dubey, 1999). Therefore, the development of bio-pesticides<br />
has been focused as a viable disease control strategy. In view<br />
of these the present investigation was undertaken to screen<br />
for the efficacy of antifungal potency of Calotropis leaf extract<br />
against important phytopathogenic fungi.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
The selected ten fungal pathogens viz., Rhizoctonia<br />
solani, Phoma sorghina, Colletotrichum gloeosporioid,<br />
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. pallidorosem, Fusarium<br />
oxysporum f.sp. ciceri, Rhizoctonia bataticola, Sclerotium<br />
rolfsii, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Alternaria cyamopsidis and<br />
Tolyposporium penicillariae were isolated from infected host<br />
and the selection of media is based on the standard<br />
recommendation for culturing these fungi.<br />
Preparation of extracts<br />
(i)<br />
(ii)<br />
(iii)<br />
Powdered extract: Thoroughly washed fresh plant<br />
leaves are oven dried at 60 0 C for two consecutive days.<br />
After drying the leaves were easily crushed by mixer.<br />
The powder of crushed leaves was stored in the airtight<br />
plastic bottles. The powder was used at the<br />
concentration of 10% for this 10 gm powder was<br />
incorporated into 50 ml of distilled water then it was<br />
kept for 24 hours. Thereafter, it was filtered into a<br />
measuring cylinder and 500 ml volume of the extract was<br />
maintained by adding the water and finally it was<br />
incorporated into the PDA flask containing concentrated<br />
potato dextrose agar media. Thus, after incorporation of<br />
500 ml extract (20%) in 500 ml PDA the final concentration<br />
of the powdered extract into the PDA was 10%.<br />
Fresh extracts (Crude): Fresh plant leaves (50g)<br />
thoroughly washed with running tap water was macerated<br />
with 50 ml sterile water in a warning blender for 10<br />
minutes. The macerate was first filtered through double<br />
layered muslin cloth and centrifuged at 4000g for 30<br />
minutes the supernatant was filtered through Whatman<br />
No.1 filter paper and sterilized at 120°C for 30 minute.<br />
The extract was preserved aseptically in a brown bottle<br />
at 5°C until further use (Satish, et al., 1999). The obtained<br />
extract served as the crude extract (100% concentration)<br />
Boiled extracts: The fresh leaves of Calotropis were<br />
dried in shadow, washed, weighted and boiled for two
SASODE AND S<strong>IN</strong>GH, Anti-Fungal Evaluation of Calotropis Leaf Plant Extracts Against Some Plant Pathogenic Fungi 83<br />
(iv)<br />
hours, thereafter it was filtered and water were<br />
incorporated into it to maintained 1:1 weight/volume<br />
basis. The extract was stored and used for bioassay of<br />
test fungus at the concentration 10%.<br />
Ethanol extracts: 100 gm powder of Calotropis leaves<br />
was incorporated into flask containing 500 ml of ethanol<br />
then it was kept open on hot plate at the temperature of<br />
42 0 C±2 for the evaporation of ethanol after then the crust<br />
of the extract remained in the flask was scraped, weighted<br />
and used for bioassay @ 1% concentration.<br />
For standardization of the concentration of the effective<br />
form the crude, boil and powdered extracts were used @ 5, 10,<br />
15 and 20% concentrations while the ethanol extract was used<br />
@ 1, 2, 3 and 4% concentrations, respectively.<br />
The plant extract were amended aseptically to melted<br />
potato dextrose agar medium in appropriate proportions and<br />
sterilized at 121°C, 15Ib/inch 2 pressure for 15 minutes and<br />
allowed to cool. Twenty ml of the medium is poured in each 10<br />
cm diameter Petridish and solidified. One disc (7 mm) of the<br />
medium containing fungal culture of the pathogen was cut<br />
from the 7 days old culture and was transferred in the centre<br />
of the Petridish under aseptic condition. The plates were then<br />
incubated at temperature 28±1 o C. Average growth of the<br />
pathogen colony was measured 5 days after incubation.<br />
Petridishes containing media devoid of the plant extract but<br />
with the same amount of distilled water served as control.<br />
Four replicates were maintained for each treatment.<br />
All the leaf extract forms were subjected to antifungal<br />
activity assay with crude (10%), powdered (10%), boil (10%)<br />
and ethanol (1%) extracts and was further subjected to<br />
poisoned food technique. Among all the tested extracts the<br />
effective extract against the respective pathogens were<br />
selected and again subjected to different four concentration<br />
of boil, powder (5, 10, 15 and 20%) and ethanol at (1, 2, 3 and<br />
4%) to find out its appropriate form respectively.<br />
The effective forms under different concentrations (boil<br />
and powder at 15 and 20% and ethanol at 3and 4%) were<br />
further evaluated against test pathogens. On the basis of<br />
significance, the concentrations of respective forms were<br />
standardized against the pathogens and were also compared<br />
with the recommended chemicals viz., carbendazim (0.1%) and<br />
mancozeb (0.2%), under in-vitro condition.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Result presented in the Table 1 shows that all the four<br />
forms of Calotropis leaf extracts significantly inhibited the<br />
growth of fungal mycelium but none of them could absolutely<br />
inhibited the growth. However, the boil form was found<br />
effective against seven phytopathogenic fungi viz., Phoma<br />
sorghina(21.00), Fusarium oxysporium f.sp. ciceri (23.24),<br />
Tolyposporium penicillariae (25.00), Colletotrichum<br />
gleosporioides (27.50), Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (30.00),<br />
Rhizoctonia solani (32.50), and Rhizoctonia bataticola<br />
(34.50). The powder form also effectively inhibited the growth<br />
of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. pallidorosem (45.50) and<br />
Sclerotium rolfsii (35.50). The ethanol form of Calotropis leaf<br />
extract was found more effective than crude, boil, powder<br />
extract form for the growth inhibition of Alternaria<br />
cyamopsides (26.50). In respect of growth inhibition the boil<br />
extract was significantly superior over the other forms.<br />
Powdered extract was significantly superior over crude and<br />
ethanol extract. Ethanol extract was found least effective but<br />
it was statistically at par with crude extract.<br />
Results presented in the Table 2 reveal that all the four<br />
concentrations significantly inhibited the growth of all the<br />
fungal pathogens but none of the concentrations absolutely<br />
inhibited the growth, however the effectivity against all the<br />
above tested fungal pathogens increases with the increase in<br />
the concentration from 5 to 20%. The growth of Fusarium<br />
oxysporum f.sp. ciceri and Rhizoctonia solani under 20%<br />
concentration of boiled leaf extract was 8 mm and 7 mm,<br />
Table 1. Efficacy of different forms of Calotropis leaf extracts against test pathogens<br />
S.No. Treatments<br />
Radial growth of fungal mycelium (mm)<br />
Fusarium oxysporium<br />
f.sp. ciceri<br />
F.o. f.sp.<br />
pallidoroseum<br />
Rhizoctonia solani<br />
1 Powder @ 10% 46.50 45.50 50.50 44.50 43.50 60.50 33.25 33.50 40.00 37.00<br />
2 Crude @ 10% 54.50 61.50 41.00 56.00 65.50 53.00 64.00 62.50 61.50 30.00<br />
3 Boil @10% 23.24 52.00 32.50 34.50 27.50 33.50 25.00 54.00 30.00 21.00<br />
4 Ethanol @ 1% 60.00 51.65 55.00 63.50 69.00 26.50 60.00 56.00 70.00 50.00<br />
5 Control 74.00 76.50 82.00 77.00 83.00 71.50 73.00 80.00 80.50 60.00<br />
SE(m)±<br />
CD at 5%<br />
1.553<br />
4.839<br />
1.438<br />
4.481<br />
1.171<br />
3.648<br />
R. bataticola<br />
1.271<br />
3.959<br />
Colletorichum<br />
gleosprioides<br />
1.084<br />
3.378<br />
Alternaria<br />
cyamopsides<br />
1.309<br />
4.072<br />
Tolyposporium<br />
penicillariae<br />
0.536<br />
1.670<br />
Sclerotium rolfsii<br />
0.841<br />
2.620<br />
Sclerotinia<br />
sclerotiorum<br />
1.094<br />
3.407<br />
Phoma sorghina<br />
1.676<br />
5.221
84 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
Table 2.<br />
Comparative efficacy of powdered extracts of<br />
Calotropis leaf under four concentrations against<br />
test pathogens<br />
Treatments<br />
Radial growth of fungal mycelium (mm)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.<br />
pallidoroseum<br />
Sclerotium<br />
rolfsii<br />
Powder leaf extract @ 5% 47.00 64.00<br />
Powder leaf extract @ 10% 25.00 31.50<br />
Powder leaf extract @ 15% 11.00 26.00<br />
Powder leaf extract @ 20% 7.00 12.00<br />
Control 72.00 79.00<br />
SE(m)±<br />
CD at 5%<br />
1.463<br />
4.559<br />
1.571<br />
4.893<br />
and Singh, 2004. Calotropis in form of the ethanol extract<br />
(Table 4) was found more effective than the other forms for<br />
the inhibition of Alternaria cyamopsides under in vitro<br />
condition.<br />
On the basis of significance, the effective concentrations<br />
of respective forms were standardized against the pathogens<br />
and were also compared with the recommended chemicals<br />
under in-vitro condition. The results (Table 5) reveal that the<br />
growth of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceri (19.50),<br />
Rhizoctonia solani (22.00), Rhizoctonia bataticola (9.00),<br />
Colletotrichum gleosporioides (13.00), Tolyposporium<br />
penicillariae (0.00) Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (19.50) and<br />
Table 3. Comparative efficacy of boil extracts of Calotropis leaf under four concentrations against test pathogens<br />
Treatments<br />
Radial growth of fungal mycelium (mm)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum<br />
f.sp. ciceri<br />
Rhizoctonia solani<br />
R. bataticola<br />
Colletorichum<br />
gleosprioides<br />
Tolyposporium<br />
penicillariae<br />
Sclerotinia<br />
sclerotiorum<br />
Phoma sorghina<br />
Boil leaf extract @ 5% 48.00 58.00 41.50 60.00 43.00 54.00 55.00<br />
Boil leaf extract @ 10% 46.00 32.00 22.00 26.00 28.00 26.00 26.00<br />
Boil leaf extract @ 15% 16.00 25.00 17.00 18.00 20.00 19.00 17.00<br />
Boil leaf extract @ 20% 8.00 7.00 10.00 8.00 13.00 15.00 14.00<br />
Control 81.00 72.00 75.00 70.00 70.00 75.00 72.00<br />
SE(m)±<br />
CD at 5%<br />
1.408<br />
4.387<br />
1.326<br />
4.131<br />
1.271<br />
3.961<br />
1.678<br />
5.229<br />
1.461<br />
4.550<br />
1.618<br />
5.040<br />
1.483<br />
4.621<br />
respectively as compared to 81 and 72 mm of control, while 16<br />
and 25 mm fungal growth of the above two pathogens was<br />
recorded under its 15% concentration. 20% showed significant<br />
inhibition over 15%, this indicate that there is a need to test<br />
the higher concentrations (>20%) of Calotropis leaf extract<br />
under boil form to obtain complete inhibition of fungal growth<br />
against Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceri and Rhizoctonia<br />
solani, similarly 20% concentration of Calotropis leaf extract<br />
under boil form showed significant inhibition of Rhizoctonia<br />
bataticola, Colletotrichum gleosporioides and<br />
Tolyposporium penicillariae over its 15% concentration.<br />
These also reflect to go for its higher concentration to obtain<br />
the complete/better inhibition. Though the minimum growth<br />
of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Phoma sorghina was recorded<br />
under 20% concentration, but it was statistically at par with<br />
its 15% concentration. This supports the use of 15%<br />
concentration of boiled extract instead of 20% for the control<br />
of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Phoma sorghina.<br />
The results presented in Table 3 reveal that the<br />
fungitoxicity of powder form of Calotropis leaf @ 20% was<br />
significantly higher over its 15% concentration for the<br />
inhibition of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. pallidoroseum and<br />
Sclerotium rolfsii. This indicate that higher concentration<br />
(>20%) may show complete inhibition of the growth. The above<br />
finding is supported by the work of Singh and Chand, 2004<br />
Phoma sorghina (9.50) effectively inhibited by the boiled<br />
extract at 20% of Calotropis leaf but the boiled extract even at<br />
20% concentration is significantly less effective than<br />
carbendazim (0.1%) and mancozeb (0.2%). It means that the<br />
boil extract @ 20% concentration may not act as an alternative<br />
to the carbendazim (0.1%) and mancozeb (0.2%), however as<br />
per the effectively trend it seems that they may act as an<br />
alternative source to the chemical under much higher<br />
concentration.<br />
Like boil extract the powder extract also effectively<br />
inhibited the growth of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp.<br />
pallidoroseum (25.00) and Sclerotium rolfsii, (12.50) at 20%<br />
concentration but these extracts could not show absolute<br />
Table 4.<br />
Comparative efficacy of ethanol extracts of<br />
Calotropis leaf under four concentrations against<br />
Alternaria cyamopsides<br />
Treatments<br />
Radial growth of fungal mycelium (mm)<br />
Ethanol leaf extract @ 1% 53.00<br />
Ethanol leaf extract @ 2% 32.00<br />
Ethanol leaf extract @ 3% 17.00<br />
Ethanol leaf extract @ 4% 9.00<br />
Control 75.00<br />
SE(m)±<br />
CD at 5%<br />
1.012<br />
3.154
SASODE AND S<strong>IN</strong>GH, Anti-Fungal Evaluation of Calotropis Leaf Plant Extracts Against Some Plant Pathogenic Fungi 85<br />
Table 5.<br />
Comparison of in vitro efficacy of different forms of Calotropis leaf extracts with chemicals against test pathogens<br />
Fusarium<br />
oxysporium f.sp.<br />
ciceri<br />
F.o. f.sp.<br />
pallidoroseum<br />
Rhizoctonia<br />
solani<br />
Powder leaf extract @ 15% N.E 32.00 N.E N.E N.E N.E N.E 24.00 N.E N.E<br />
Powder leaf extract @ 20% N.E 25.00 N.E N.E N.E N.E N.E 12.50 N.E N.E<br />
Boil extract @ 15% 29.00 N.E 28.00 24.00 22.00 N.E 12.75 N.E 30.50 20.50<br />
Boil extract @ 20% 19.50 N.E 22.00 13.00 13.00 N.E 0.00 N.E 19.50 9.50<br />
Ethanol leaf extract @3% N.E N.E N.E N.E N.E 31.00 N.E N.E N.E N.E<br />
Ethanol leaf extract @ 4% N.E N.E N.E N.E N.E 14.00 N.E N.E N.E N.E<br />
Mancozeb @ 0.2% 00.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 4.50 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Carbendazim @ 0.1% 00.00 0.00 7.00 00.00 2.50 0.00 8.00 2.50 0.00 8.50<br />
Control 80.00 87.00 74.00 80.00 78.00 80.00 80.00 64.00 74.00 78.00<br />
SE(m)±<br />
CD at 5%<br />
2.167<br />
6.751<br />
1.413<br />
4.403<br />
1.661<br />
5.174<br />
R. bataticola<br />
1.620<br />
5.048<br />
Colletorichum<br />
gleosprioides<br />
0.980<br />
3.052<br />
Alternaria<br />
cyamopsides<br />
1.095<br />
3.413<br />
Tolyposporium<br />
penicillariae<br />
1.220<br />
3.802<br />
Sclerotium<br />
rolfsii<br />
0.801<br />
2.495<br />
Sclerotinia<br />
sclerotiorum<br />
1.777<br />
5.537<br />
Phoma sorghina<br />
1.114<br />
3.472<br />
inhibition and were significantly inferior to carbendazim (0.1%)<br />
and mancozeb (0.2%), though the effectiveness of powder<br />
extract gradually increased in the concentration from 5 to 20%.<br />
It indicates that the absolute inhibition in the growth of above<br />
test fungi may be achieved under > 20% concentration of<br />
powder form of Calotropis leaf extract.<br />
The ethanol form of Calotropis leaf extract was found<br />
more effective than the crude, boil and powder extract form<br />
for the growth inhibition of Alternaria cyamopsides (14.00) at<br />
4% concentration, but like boil, powder extract it could not<br />
show the absolute inhibition while the carbendazim (0.1%)<br />
completely inhibited the growth.<br />
Therefore in the direction of eco-friendly management<br />
there is a need to test the extracts against the fungal pathogens<br />
under much higher concentration so that possibilities may be<br />
created for the use of the above forms of Calotropis extracts<br />
as an alternative to the chemical for the management of above<br />
fungal pathogens.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Abd-Alla, M.S., Atalla, K.M. and Elp-Sawi, M.A.M. 2001. Effect of<br />
some plant waste extracts on growth and aflatoxin production by<br />
Aspergillus flavus. Annals Agric. Sci., Ain Shams Univ., Cairo., 46:<br />
579-592.<br />
Ahmed, N. and Grainge, M. 1982. Some promising plants for pest<br />
control under small scale forming operation in developing countries<br />
working paper resource system institute, East-West Centre,<br />
Honolulu, Hawai, USA. pp.55.<br />
Grane, M. and Ahmad, S. 1988. Handbook of Plants with Pest Control<br />
Properties. John Wiley and Sons, New York.<br />
Satish, S., Raveesha, K.A. and Janardhana, G. R. 1999. Antibacterial<br />
activity of plant extracts on phytopathogenic Xanthomonas<br />
campestris pathovars. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 28: 145-<br />
147.<br />
Singh, P.P. 2004. Management of Alternaria blight of mustard by use of<br />
botanicals. M.Sc. (Ag) Thesis, JNKVV, Jabalpur.<br />
Singh, Surendra and Chand, Hari 2004. Effect of extracts of some<br />
medicinal plants on spore germination of chickpea wilt pathogen<br />
(Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. (Pad.) Snyd. and Hans.). Indian J. Pl.<br />
Prot., 32(1): 162-163.<br />
Verma, J. and Dubey, N.K. 1999. Prospecdtives of botanical and<br />
microbial products aspesticides of tomorrow. Current Science, 76:<br />
172-179.<br />
Wilson, C.L., Solar, J.M., Ghaouth, A.El. and Wisniewski, M.E. 1997.<br />
Rapid evaluation of plant extracts and essential oils for antifungal<br />
activity against Botrytis cinerea. Pl. Dis., 81: 201-210.<br />
Recieved on 12-01-<strong>2013</strong> Accepted on 25-01-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 86-87, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Studies on Status of Leaf Spot of Groundnut in Chunar and Nearby Areas of Mirzapur<br />
District of Uttar Pradesh<br />
BHARAT CHANDRA NATH, R.B. S<strong>IN</strong>GH AND LAXMAN PRASAD BALAI<br />
Department of Mycology and Plant Pathology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University,<br />
Varanasi 221 005, India<br />
e-mail: bharatpal05@gmail.com<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Roving surveys conducted from 2009-10 and 2010-11 kharif<br />
season (August to October) indicated that groundnut plants in<br />
Chunar and its neighbouring areas of Mirzapur district of Uttar<br />
Pradesh averaged 40 and 39% in two years, respectively and<br />
groundnut crops averaged 13% loss due to late leaf spot (LLS)<br />
fungus, Phaeoisariopsis personata. The late leaf spot disease<br />
was more prevalent than early leaf spot (ELS) caused by<br />
Cercospora arachidicola in these areas. Intensity of the disease<br />
in different areas surveyed, ranged from 13 to 22% in the month<br />
of September and 35 to 45% in October during 2009. In the<br />
year 2010 disease intensity ranged from 13 to 24% in September<br />
and 33 to 42% in October respectively.<br />
Key words<br />
Leaf spat, survey, cercospora, disease intensity<br />
Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) also known as peanut<br />
and native to South America, it is grown over an area of 8<br />
million ha with an annual production of 7.5 million tonnes. A<br />
production of 83.32 lakh tonnes has been recorded during<br />
2003-04 (Hegde, 2005). The major states that grow this crop<br />
are Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu,<br />
Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and<br />
Orissa. Diseases, pests and unpredictable rainfall patterns<br />
are one of the major constraints in achieving high production<br />
of groundnut. A large number of diseases attack groundnut in<br />
India (Mayee and Dater, 1988). The majority is caused by<br />
fungi and several of them are yield reducer in certain regions<br />
and seasons. There are a few economically important foliar<br />
fungal diseases, such as early (Cercospora arachidicola)<br />
and late leaf spots (Phaeoisariopsis personata (Berk and Curt<br />
v. Arx,) commonly called as tikka diseases and groundnut<br />
rust. As the area under groundnut is predominant in kharif<br />
(rainy) season (81%), the foliar diseases like late leaf spot and<br />
rust may cause yield losses up to 50% in the semi - arid tropics.<br />
In India, late leaf spot is more severe than early leaf spot<br />
(Ghewande, 1990; Anon., 1993). It causes severe defoliation<br />
and reduces pod yields by more than 50% if the crop is not<br />
protected with chemicals (Shew, et al., 1988). The symptoms<br />
are characterised by circular necrotic lesions of 1-6mm diameter<br />
on both surfaces of leaf, later become dark brown to black<br />
without any yellow halo (Rangaswami and Mahadevan, 2006).<br />
Yield losses of about 10 per cent kernels have been estimated<br />
from the southern USA where fungicide application is normally<br />
practiced. Over much of the semi-arid tropics where chemical<br />
control of leaf spots is rarely practiced, losses in excess of<br />
50% are common (Jackson and Bell, 1969; Garren and Jackson,<br />
1973). In India, losses in yield due to the leaf spots have been<br />
estimated to be in the range of 15 to 59% (Sulaiman, 1966;<br />
Ramakrishnan and Rao, 1968 and Chohan, 1974). Sulaiman,<br />
1966 also recorded a reduction in groundnut yield of 40% due<br />
to leaf spot in Maharashtra and Siddaramaiah, et al., 1977<br />
found a loss of more than 50% in Karnataka. Sundaram, 1965<br />
observed a loss up to 22% in yield compared plots receiving<br />
fungicide sprays. Hegde, et al., 1995 observed that the late<br />
leaf spot disease of groundnut appeared at 55 to 60 days after<br />
sowing and would cause more than 50% loss in pod and haulm<br />
yield in groundnut producing areas of Karnataka. Keeping in<br />
view the above facts, a survey was conducted to elucidate<br />
the status of leaf spot of groundnut disease.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Groundnut fields were randomly roving survey of Chunar<br />
and nearby areas of Mirzapur District of Uttar Pradesh were<br />
conducted for the occurrence and severity of of Cercospora<br />
leaf spot. Survey was conducted during kharif season<br />
(August-October) at fourteen locations of the area in the year<br />
2009-10 and 2010-11. For assessing disease intensity five fields<br />
from each location, situated 500 m apart from each other, were<br />
selected. From each field ten plants were selected to calculate<br />
disease intensity. Disease scoring was done based on the 1-9<br />
point scale was adopted for recording the severity similar to<br />
field screening of groundnut genotypes for resistance to late<br />
leaf spot (Subrahmanyam, et al., 1995). Thirty leaves were<br />
collected from 10 randomly selected plants from top, middle<br />
and bottom of the crop canopy in each field and scored<br />
individually taking into account the leaf area damaged by the<br />
disease and the extent of defoliation in the plants where 1 =<br />
0%, 2 = 1-5%, 3 = 6 -10%, 4 = 11-20%, 5 = 21-30%, 6 = 31-40%,<br />
7 = 41-60%, 8 = 61-80%, 9 = 81- 100% disease severity. The per<br />
cent disease severity index (PDI) was then calculated. Disease<br />
rating was done on each trifoliate leaves on selected plants.<br />
Later these ratings were converted into percent disease index<br />
(PDI) by using the following formula.<br />
Sum of individual rating scale<br />
Per cent disease index (PDI) = —————————— x 100<br />
No. of disease plant observation × maxi. dis. rating<br />
Leaves showing typical Cercospora leaf spot symptom<br />
were collected and isolation were made under laboratory<br />
conditions.
NATH, et al., Studies on status of leaf spot of groundnut in Chunar and nearby areas of Mirzapur 87<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Groundnut crop grown in Chunar and nearby areas was<br />
infected by Phaeoisariopsis personata and produced typical<br />
Cercospora leaf spot that was noticed in the 4 th week of August<br />
in both the year 2009 and 2010. The severe incidence of the<br />
disease was seen in last week of September to October. The<br />
symptom of the disease appeared mainly on the leaf, but on<br />
later stage disease spread to stem portion also. The disease<br />
first appeared on upper surface of the lower leaf and then<br />
moved towards up in favorable conditions. In severe<br />
conditions defoliation of leaves occurs. Late leaf spot caused<br />
by P. personata was more prevalent in these areas than early<br />
leaf spot caused by Cercospora arachidicola.<br />
The intensity of the disease in different surveyed<br />
villages of Chunar and nearby area ranged from 12.57 to 22.12%<br />
in the month of September and 34.67 to 44.95% in the month<br />
of October in 2009. In the year 2010 disease intensity ranged<br />
from 12.63 to 23.88% in the month of September and 33.22 to<br />
41.84% in the month of October. Average intensity was found<br />
as 17.84, 40.14, 18.96 and 38.61% in the month of September<br />
and October and in the year 2009 and 2010, respectively (Table<br />
1). These results confirm the findings (Ghewande, 1990;<br />
Anon., 1993). In India, late leaf spot is more severe than early<br />
leaf spot. It causes severe defoliation and reduces pod yields<br />
by more than 50% if the crop is not protected with chemicals<br />
(Shew, et al., 1988). Hegde, et al., 1995 observed that the late<br />
leaf spot disease of groundnut appeared at 55 to 60 days after<br />
sowing and would cause more than 50% loss in pod and haulm<br />
yield in groundnut producing areas of Karnataka. Current<br />
studies on occurrence of Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) disease<br />
was recorded throughout kharif season starting from 4 th week<br />
of August on most of the cultivars grown in the Chunar and<br />
Table 1.<br />
Disease index of Cercospora leaf spot of groundnut<br />
in Chunar and nearby areas of Mirzapur district<br />
of Uttar Pradesh<br />
Village<br />
Per cent disease index (PDI)<br />
2009 2010<br />
September October September October<br />
Nakahara 18.26 39.49 20.36 33.22<br />
Jalalpur 16.57 41.32 22.10 41.84<br />
Keshavpur 15.39 43.79 17.39 36.87<br />
Pachevara 13.20 41.27 12.63 39.40<br />
Naugaraha 22.12 44.95 19.84 40.50<br />
Bishnupur 20.03 42.73 14.43 38.39<br />
Chandapur 19.70 37.35 21.20 38.70<br />
Shivpur 15.89 36.26 13.93 39.29<br />
Gangpur 19.32 38.37 23.88 35.25<br />
Bhavani 20.33 39.71 21.59 33.60<br />
Lohra 12.57 34.67 19.63 40.32<br />
Kailahat 21.38 40.54 17.88 38.82<br />
Sikandarpur 16.76 38.98 20.30 41.51<br />
Samauli 18.34 42.64 20.34 42.94<br />
Average 17.84 40.14 18.96 38.61<br />
nearby areas of Mirzapur district, Uttar Pradesh. The severe<br />
incidence of the disease was seen in last week of September<br />
to October. The intensity of the disease reached up to 44.95%<br />
on most of the local cultivars of groundnut grown. In severe<br />
condition defoliation of leaves takes place and disease spread<br />
to stem portion also. So it can be concluded that Cercospora<br />
leaf spot (CLS) disease is a very important disease of study<br />
and subsequently management practices to be adopted for<br />
betterment of the farming community.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Anonymous 1993. Annual progress report on kharif Groundnut. All<br />
India co-ordinated research project on Oilseeds, Directorate of<br />
Oilseeds Research, Rajendra Nagar, Hyderabad, pp.491.<br />
Chohan, J. 1974. Recent advances in diseases of groundnut in India. In:<br />
Current trends in Plant Pathology, Lucknow University press,<br />
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, pp.171-184.<br />
Garren, K.H. and Jackson, C.R. 1973. Peanut diseases. La: Peanutsculture<br />
and uses. American Peanut Research and Education<br />
Association, stone printing Co, Roanoke, Viginia, USA. pp. 429-<br />
491.<br />
Ghewande, M.P. 1990. Diseases of groundnut and their management.<br />
Journal of Oilseeds Research., 7: 78-97.<br />
Hegde, D.M. 2005. Striving for self-sufficiency. The Hindu Survey of<br />
Indian Agriculture, pp.55-63.<br />
Hegde, V.M., Subrahmanyam, K., Gowda, M.V.C. and Prabhu, T.G. 1995.<br />
Estimation of yield loss due to late leaf spot disease in Spanish<br />
groundnut in Karnataka. Karolinska Journal of Agricultural Science,<br />
8: 355-359.<br />
Jackson, C.R. and Bell, D.K. 1969. Diseases of peanut (groundnut)<br />
caused by fungi. University of Georgia, College of Agriculture<br />
Experiment Station, Research Bulletin No. 56, pp.137.<br />
Mayee, C.D. and Dater, V.V. 1988. Diseases of groundnut in the tropics.<br />
Review of Tropical Plant Pathology, 5: 169-198.<br />
Ramkrishnan, V. and Appa Rao, A. 1968. Studies on tikka disease of<br />
groundnut. Indian Phytopathology, 21: 31-36.<br />
Rangaswami, G. and Mahadevan, A. 2006. Diseases of crop plants in<br />
India. 4 th Ed. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi. pp.335-<br />
336.<br />
Shew, B.B., Beute, M.K. and Wynne, J.C. 1988. Effect of temperature<br />
and relative humidity on Expansion of resistance to Cercosporidium<br />
personatum in Peanut. Phytopathology, 78: 493-498.<br />
Siddaramaiah, A.L., Hiramath, R.V. and Krishan, K.S. 1977. Control of<br />
tikka disease of groundnut with Detur. Journal of Plant Protection,<br />
5: 193-194.<br />
Subrahmanyam, P., Mc Donald, D., Waliyar, F., Reddy, L.J., Nigam, S.<br />
N., Gibbons, R.W., Rao, V.R., Singh, A.K., Pande, S., Reddy, P.M.<br />
and Subba Rao, P.V. 1995. Screening methods and sources of<br />
resistance to rust and late leaf spot of groundnut. Information<br />
Bullatin No. 47, ICRISAT, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India, pp.19.<br />
Sulaiman, M. 1966. Investigations on the control of tikka disease of<br />
groundnut in the Maharashtra State. Abstract. Review of Applied<br />
Mycology, 45: 305.<br />
Sundaram, N.V. 1965. Note on creation of tikka leaf spot of groundnut,<br />
Indian Oilseeds Journal, 9: 98.<br />
Recieved on 19-09-2012 Accepted on 02-01-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 88-92, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Studies on the Effect of Scent Components on the Somatic Cells of Allium sativum L<br />
CH. SR<strong>IN</strong>IVASULU<br />
Department of Zoology, Govt Degree College, Peddapalli, Karimnagar Distt. A.P. India<br />
e-mail: chsri39@gmail.com<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
The mutagenic efficiency of certain secretions (1-Butanol and<br />
1-Hexanol) of heteropteran, bugs are assayed on the root tips<br />
cells of Allium sativum L 1-Butanol and 1-hexanol (alcohols)<br />
when applied on the root tips cells of A.satium,caused<br />
considerable disturbance during the course of mitotic division.<br />
The dec line in mito tic inde x wa s greate r at hig her<br />
concentrations. The spectrum of mitotic abnormalities included<br />
disturbed chromosomes at prophase, un-orientation of<br />
chromosomes at metaphase,due to non-formation of spindles.<br />
Unequal separation of chromosomes, formation of anaphase<br />
bridges, tripolar grouping and unoriented chromosomes,<br />
fragmented chromosomes at prophase, disturbed chromosomes<br />
at metaphase, chromosomal stickiness, and disturbed anaphase<br />
due to un-orientation spindle.The chromosomal aberrations<br />
induced by these test compounds were gaps, chromatids breaks,<br />
pulverizations,clumping and cells with sticky chromosomes<br />
dice ntric chromo somes and ce ntrome ric breaks,more<br />
frequently and regularly appeared in all the time intervals.<br />
Key words<br />
Heteropteran bugs,scent components,1-Butanol,1-<br />
Hexanol, Allium sativum<br />
Most of the heteropteran bugs secrete a pungent volatile<br />
compounds from the abdominal and metathoracic scent<br />
glands. In order to test the mutagenicity of these scent<br />
compounds from insects. Allium is being used as an<br />
experimental materials. Certain aldehydes like octenal,2-<br />
octenal, and 4-hydroxy-2-octenal acted as antirespiratories,<br />
cytological aberrations they induce are very few (Canuto, et<br />
al., 1985). n-butyl butyrate, n-dodecane and n-pentadecane<br />
are the scent components of C.purpureus causing cytological<br />
aberrations in the root tips cells of Allium sativum (Surender,<br />
et al., 1987). They showed inhibition effect may be due to the<br />
blockage of DNA synthesis (Digamber Rao, et al., 1987). 1-<br />
Butanol, 1-Hexanol were the scent components reported from<br />
the scent glands of Libyaspis angoleunsis (Cmelic, 1969) and<br />
Gelastocoris oculatus (Staddon and Thorne, 1973).<br />
Most of the chemicals were previously treated for<br />
inducing chromosomal aberrations (Sagoo, et al., 1993).<br />
Sadasivaiah, et al., 1973, studied the effect of lysergic acid,<br />
diethyl amide on onion, rye and barley. Action of<br />
antihistamine, dimecras and leaf extracts of Azadirachta indica<br />
were observed as somatic cells of Allium sativum L<br />
Chandrakala and Vidyavathi, 1992). In tumor cells, Aliphatic<br />
aldehydes react with cellular thiol compounds (Sessa, et al.,<br />
1977) and cause ultra structural alterations of plasma<br />
membranes of Golgi vesicles, mitochondria and nuclei (Bassi,<br />
1967).<br />
Effect of mitomycino-c was studied on root tips cells of<br />
Cuminium cyminum (Mogili, et al.,1984) and BIT-4 on root<br />
tips of A.sativum. (Sadanandam, et al., 1984). Teratogenicity<br />
and abnormal chromosomal recombination by selenium<br />
compounds have been reported (Ray, et al., 1978; Morimoto,<br />
et al., 1982). Effect of polluted water, heavy metals, fertilizer,<br />
pesticides as chromosomal of Allium sps. Roots were also<br />
studied.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Actively growing root tips of A.sativum L were<br />
harvested and treated with various concentrations (0.01, 0.5,<br />
1.0 and 2.0%) of scent components from heteropteran bugs<br />
for a duration of 2,4 and 6 hours. The required concentrations<br />
were prepared in acetone as these components do not dissolve<br />
in distilled water.<br />
After each duration of treatment of the root tips from all<br />
the samples were fixed in carnoys fluid (1 part of acetic acid<br />
and 3 parts of absolute alcohol) and kept in the refrigerator.<br />
The root tips were allowed to remain in the fixative for 24<br />
hours and then transferred into 70% alcohol. About 2000<br />
randomly selected dividing cells from ten different root tips<br />
were washed thoroughly with distilled water and then<br />
temporary squash preparations were prepared for cytological<br />
observations employing the acetocarmine as the nuclear<br />
stain.Various mitotic aberrations of metaphase, anaphase and<br />
telophase stages have been observed under meopta<br />
compound microscope (Czechoslovakia) with the aid of X10<br />
as eye piece and X 60 as objective.<br />
Number of cells in division<br />
Mitotic index (MI)= ——————————————— x100<br />
Total number of cells scored<br />
Estimation of mitotic index is an important protocol as it<br />
reflects the action of a given compound on cell division and<br />
DNA synthesis. 1500 to 2000 cells were scored from each time<br />
interval i.e., 24,48 and 72 hours.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
1-Butanol, the alcoholic component from the scent<br />
secretions of abdominal scent glands of Libiaspis angolensis<br />
(Cmelik, 1969) and 1-Hexanol, the alcoholic component in the<br />
scent secretions of metathoracic scent glands of Gelastocoris<br />
oculatus (Staddon, 1973) were used. These two alcoholic<br />
compounds were employed for mutagenic efficiency on the<br />
chromosomes of Allium sativum. 1-Butanol and 1-hexanol
SR<strong>IN</strong>IVASULU, Studies on the effect of scent components on the somatic cells of Allium sativum L 89<br />
alcoholic compounds were proved to be irritants.<br />
Various concentrations (0.01,0.5, 1.0 and 2.0) of these<br />
scent components were prepared in acetone and treated with<br />
the Allium sativum root tips.It has been observed that these<br />
components caused considerable disturbance during the<br />
course of mitotic divisions. The data of chromosomal<br />
aberrations and mitotic index, presented in Table 1, 2, showed<br />
clearly the lower values compared to control in all the<br />
concentrations and durations (2, 4 and 6 hours) for both 1-<br />
butanol, 1-hexanol compounds and further decrease in values<br />
were found in higher concentrations.The maximum decline in<br />
mitotic index was recorded in 2.0% concentration of 1-butanol<br />
treated for 6hours. The fall in mitotic induces soon after 1-<br />
butanol and 1-hexanol treatments indicated that many cells of<br />
proceeding G2 phase entering in the mitotic cycle were effected<br />
and may be due to the chronic effect on all or on some of the<br />
proceeding stages of mitotic divisions.<br />
The most frequent abnormalities uncounted were<br />
stickiness of chromosome at higher concentrations (1.0%,<br />
2.0%) due to the effect of alcoholic compound, 1-butanol the<br />
spectrum of mitotic abnormalities included disturbed<br />
chromosomes at prophase (Fig.1), unorientation of<br />
chromosomes at metaphase due to non formation of spindle<br />
(Fig. 2) and unequal separation of chromosomes (Fig. 3).<br />
The root tips of A.sativum treated with 1-butanol with<br />
different concentration showed chromosomal stickiness,<br />
fragments and bridges at metaphase, anaphase and telophase.<br />
Moreover, the chromosomal abnormalities observed were<br />
found to be increased with increased concentrations of 1-<br />
butanol. The compound had more inhibitory effect on the<br />
percentage of mitosis in the root tips. Simultaneously, delayed<br />
mitosis was observed in the root tips treated with higher<br />
concentrations and the mitotic index gradually decreased with<br />
increased concentrations.<br />
The formation of anaphase bridge may be due to the<br />
development of dicentric chromosomes with two centromeres<br />
of each dicentric chromosomes being oriented towards<br />
opposite poles (Aly Mohammed, et al., 1966). The dicentric<br />
chromosomes, presumably, arose by the reunion of two sister<br />
chromatids of the broken chromosomes. (Koller, 1952, Grant<br />
and Harnery, 1960). Fragmentation of Chromosomes in A.<br />
sativum has earlier been reported (Digamber Rao, et al ., 1987).<br />
Mitodepressive and Clastogenic activity of crude drug<br />
Combination on the somatic cells of Farniculum vulgare is<br />
reported (Krishna Reddy, et al., 1984), and also earlier reported<br />
the Influence of Floral pigments of Periwinkle plant on Cell<br />
division (Mogili, et al., 1985). Diagonal spindles were<br />
frequently observed in all concentrations for both these<br />
chemicals under study. Antimutagenic potential of curcumin<br />
on chromosomal aberrations in Allium cepa (Ragunathan and<br />
Pammeer, 2007), cytotoxic and genotoxic impact of silver<br />
nanoparticle using root tips cells of Allium cepa as an indicator<br />
(Kumari, et al., 2009).<br />
Similar results were identified for treatment of 1-hexanol<br />
with the root tips of A. sativum in different concentrations.<br />
The chromosomal abnormalities showing stickiness,<br />
fragments and bridges were observed in higher concentrations<br />
(0.5%, 1.0% and 2.0%). The spectrum of mitotic abnormalities<br />
included, formation of anaphase bridges (Fig.4), tripolar<br />
groupings and un-oriented chromosomes (Fig.5). Fragmented<br />
chromosomes and bridges (Fig.6). These chromosomal<br />
aberrations were found to be increased with higher<br />
concentration of 1-hexanol (1.0+2.0 %). These results show<br />
that among these two alcoholic compounds the 1-butanol<br />
was more effective than that of 1-hexanol for the root tips of<br />
A.sativum.<br />
If certain heteropteran bugs on being disturbed they<br />
discharge a pungent, volatile liquid from both,abdominal and<br />
Table 1.<br />
Concentration<br />
Percentage<br />
Mitotic Index (MI) and percentage aberrations in Allium sativum L. with 1-Butanol a scent component of Heteropteran<br />
bugs<br />
Duration of<br />
treatment<br />
(Hr)<br />
Types of Abnormalities<br />
Mitotic<br />
Metaphase Anaphase Telophase<br />
index<br />
(MI) Stickiness Fragments Stickiness Bridges Stickiness Bridges<br />
Control 12.4 0.05 -- -- -- -- -- 0.04 0.05<br />
2 12.0 -- 0.2 -- -- -- -- 0.2 0.4<br />
0.01 4 12.1 0.3 0.3 -- -- -- -- 0.2 0.8<br />
6 12.3 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.2 -- 0.1 0.4 1.9<br />
2 12.1 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 1.4<br />
0.5 4 12 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 2.1<br />
6 12.2 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 3.2<br />
2 12.2 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.2 2.6<br />
1.0 4 11 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.4 4.0<br />
6 11.4 0.8 1.0 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.8 5.5<br />
2 11.0 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.8 5.0<br />
2.0 4 10.2 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.4 0.9 0.7 1.0 7.8<br />
6 9.6 1.8 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.3 1.0 1.2 11.0<br />
Diagonal<br />
spindles<br />
Total<br />
aberrations
90 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
metathoracic scent glands.Some hydrocarbons and<br />
unsaturated aliphatic aldehydes have been reported from the<br />
scent secretion of dorsal abdominal scent glands of certain<br />
heteropteran bugs (Baggini, et al., 1966) Watanuki and<br />
Sakaguchi, 1981 demonstrated the antitumor activity of<br />
benzaldehyde. Canuto, et al., 1985 reported some of the<br />
aldehydes like octanal, 2-octenal, 4-hydroxy-2-octenal (HOE),<br />
nonal, 2-nonenal, 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE) acted as<br />
antirespiratory. Some of the scent components are<br />
carcinostatic (Schaurenstein, et al., 1987), anti fungal<br />
(Surender, et al., 1987) and antibacterial; (Surender, et al., 1988)<br />
sex-attractant (Park and Sutherland, 1962) and neurotoxins<br />
(Escousbas and Nakajime, 1994). Surender, et al., 1987 reported<br />
the mitotic effect due to n-dodecane and n-pentadecane, the<br />
hydrocarbons which act as contact poision reported from the<br />
abdominal scent glands of larvae Chrysocoris purpureus<br />
(Janaiah, et al., 1988). Watanuki and Sakaguchi, 1981<br />
demonstrated the antitumor activity of benzaldehyde. Canuto,<br />
et al., 1985 reported some of the aldehydes like octanal, 2-<br />
octenal, 4-hydroxy-2-octenal (HOE), 2-nonenal acted as<br />
antirespiratory. In recent years some of the antibiotic have<br />
proved to be effective, cytotoxic and mutagenic in both animals<br />
and plants many antibiotics. Which interfer with DNA<br />
synthesis, also effect cell division process and induce<br />
chromosomal aberrations (Rendi and Ochae, 1962). Digambar<br />
Rao, et al., 1987 studies the mutagenic efficiency of n-butylbutyrate.<br />
The ester component,found in the scent secretion<br />
of Amorbus rhombifer on the root tips of Allium sativum with<br />
different concentrations.it was found that higher<br />
concentration of n-butyl-butyrate showed greater effect on<br />
the mitosis of A.sativum, inhibition of cell division, spindle<br />
apparatus and cell wall development. The inhibitory effect<br />
may be due to the blockage of DNA synthesis. (Heiner, 1971).<br />
Action of 1-butanol, 1-hexanol on mitotic cells (Table<br />
1,2) division of A.sativum caused considerable mitodepression.<br />
The spectrum of mitotic abnormalities includes<br />
disturbed chromosomes at prophase, un-orientation of<br />
chromosomes at metaphase due to non-formation of spindle,<br />
unequal separation of chromosomes, formation of anaphase<br />
bridges, tripolar grouping and un oriented chromosomes,<br />
fragmented chromosomes and bridges. The formation of<br />
anaphase bridges may be due to the development of dicentric<br />
chromosomes with two centromeres of each dicentric<br />
chromosomes being oriented towards opposite poles (Aly<br />
Mohammed, et al., 1966). Formation of chromosomes in Allium<br />
cepa has been earlier reported by Sagoo, et al., 1993. The<br />
dicentric chromosomes presumably, arose by the re union of<br />
two sister chromatids of the broken chromosomes (Koller,<br />
1952, Grant and Harney, 1960, Unoriented chromosomes were<br />
frequently observed in all concentrations for both alcoholic<br />
compounds. These treated root tips cells showed considerable<br />
decline in mitotic indices at all concentrations compared to<br />
the control the fall in the mitotic indices soon after the<br />
treatments may be due to affect of proceeding G2 phase<br />
entering in mitosis.<br />
Thus it may be observed that the scent components<br />
induced cytological aberrations and possibly acted as mitotic<br />
inhibitor; The inhibitory effect may be due to the blockage of<br />
DNA synthesis in general. The spindle inhibiting action may<br />
mostly be caused by other C-mitotic agents (Deysson Gay,<br />
1975).<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />
I thanks, Head, Department of Zoology, Kakatiya<br />
University Warangal, A.P. for providing his laboratory facilities<br />
to perform some experiments during this work. I express my<br />
sincere gratitude to my beloved research guide Dr. C. Janaiah,<br />
Retired Professor, Department of Zoology, KU. for his<br />
invaluable support and encouragement in doing this article. I<br />
Table 2.<br />
Concentration<br />
percentage<br />
Mitotic Index (MI) and percentage aberrations in Allium sativum L. with 1-Hexanol a scent component of Heteropteran<br />
bugs<br />
Duration of<br />
treatment (hr)<br />
Mitotic index<br />
(MI)<br />
Types of abnormalities<br />
Metaphase Anaphase Telophase<br />
Stickiness Fragments Stickiness Bridges Stickiness Bridges<br />
Control 12.4 0.05 -- -- -- -- -- 0.04 0.05<br />
2 12.3 -- 0.3 -- -- -- -- -- 0.3<br />
0.01<br />
4 12.1 0.1 0.2 -- -- -- -- 0.2 0.5<br />
6 12.2 0.2 0.5 -- -- -- -- 0.4 1.1<br />
2 12.0 0.2 0.4 -- 0.2 0.4 -- 0.3 1.5<br />
0.5<br />
4 11.8 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 2.2<br />
6 11.6 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.3 2.4<br />
2 11.2 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 2.7<br />
1.0<br />
4 11.0 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.2 2.9<br />
6 11.0 0.4 1.0 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.6 4.2<br />
2 11.0 0.2 0.8 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.8 0.7 4.3<br />
2.0<br />
4 10.0 1.2 1.2 1.5 1.2 0.6 0.7 1.2 7.6<br />
6 9.8 1.0 2.0 1.3 1.6 1.2 1.2 1.4 9.7<br />
Diagonal<br />
spindles<br />
Total<br />
aberrations
SR<strong>IN</strong>IVASULU, Studies on the effect of scent components on the somatic cells of Allium sativum L 91<br />
thank Prof. Vidyavathi, Department of Botany, Kakatiya<br />
University Warangal for her critical and invaluable<br />
suggestions and allowing us to use laboratory space to perform<br />
photography.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Fig. 1-6: 1-Butanol and 1-Hexano l induc ed c ytologic al<br />
aberrations in the root tips of Allium sativum (x2000)<br />
Fig. 1: Disturbed chromosomes at prophase 2% 1-Butanol for<br />
4 hrs.<br />
Fig. 2: Un orientation of chromosomes at metaphase due to<br />
Non-formation of spindle at 1% 1-Butanol treated for 6<br />
hours<br />
Fig. 3: Unequal separation of Chromosomes at 1% 1-Butanol<br />
treated for 6 hours<br />
Fig. 4: Formation of anaphase bridges at 2% 1-Hexanol treated<br />
for 6 hours<br />
Fig. 5: Tripolar groupings and Un oriented Chromosomes at<br />
2% 1-Hexanol treated for 4 hours.<br />
Fig. 6: Fragmented Chromosomes and bridges 1% 1-Hexanol<br />
treated for 6 hours.<br />
Aly, H. Mohamed, Howard, G. Applegate and James, D. Smith. 1966.<br />
Cytological reactions induced by sodium fluorides in Allium root<br />
tips of chromosomes. Can J. Genet. Cytol., 8:241-244.<br />
Baggini, A. Barnardi, R. Casnati, G. Pavan M. and Rice, A. 1966. Ricerche<br />
Sulle Secrezioni defensive di insetti Emitteri Eterotterri (Hem.<br />
Heteroptera). Eos (Madrid), 42:7-26.<br />
Bassi, M. 1967. Find structural alterations of yoshidaascites hepatoma<br />
cells following treatment with L-erythro a,b-di-hydroxy<br />
butyraldehyde, Dru. J. Cancer. 3:103-103.<br />
Canuto, R.A. Biocca, M.E., Muzio, G., Garcea, R. and Dianzani, M.U.<br />
1985. The effect of various aldehydes on the respiration of Rat<br />
Liver and Hepatoma AH-130 cells. Cell Biochem. Funct., 3:3-8.<br />
Chandrakala, G. and Vidyavati. 1992. Studies on the effect of crude<br />
drugs of Azadirachta indica (L) on the somatic cells of Allium<br />
Sativum (L). Res. JPI. Environ. 8(1&2): 69-73.<br />
Cmelik, S. 1969. Volatile aldehydes in the odoriferous secretion of the<br />
stink bug, Libyaspis angolensis Hoppe-selyer’s Z. Physiol. Chem.,<br />
350: 1076-1080.<br />
Digamber Rao, B., Surender, P. Janaiah, C. and Vidyavati. 1987. N-<br />
butyl butyrate induced cytological aberration in Allium sativum L.<br />
Curr. Sci., 56: 98-99.<br />
Escoubas, T. and Nakajime, T. 1994. Arthropods defensive substances<br />
as Neurotoxins and Repellent agents. 12 th Congres s of the<br />
International Union for the study of social insects IUSSI, Paris,<br />
Sorbonne, 21-27 August, pp.106.<br />
Grant, W.F. and Horney, P.M. 1960. Cytogenetic effects of maleic<br />
hydrazide treatment of tomato seeds. Can. J. Genet. Cytol., 2:162-<br />
174.<br />
Heiner, R.E. 1971. Mutation Res, 12: 249.<br />
Janaiah, C., Leela Kumari, S.J., Rao, P.S. and Surender, P. 1988. Chemical<br />
analysis of secretion from the abdominal scent glands of Chrysocoris<br />
purpureus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Proc. Indian Acad. Sci.<br />
(Ani. Sci.) 97(1): 111-115.<br />
Koller, 1952. Dicentric Chromosomes in rat turnor indiced by an<br />
auromatic nitrogen mustard. Heredity (Suppl) 6: 181-196.<br />
Krishna Reddy, M., Chari, N. Kokate, C.K., Sathaiah and Vidyavati,<br />
1984. Mito growth of Cladophora crispate (Roth). Real. Res. J.Pl.<br />
Environ, 4: 27-30<br />
Kumari M., Mukherjee A., Chandra Sekaran N. 2009. Genotoxicity of<br />
silver nano particles in Allium sepa. Sci. Total Environ Sept., 15<br />
407(19): 5243-6.<br />
Mogili, T., Sathaiah, G. and Vidyavati. 1985a. The influence of floral<br />
pigments of periwinkle plant on cell division. Indian Bot. Reptr.,<br />
4:16-19.<br />
Mogili, T. Venkateswarlu, M. Sadanandam, A. and Kumar, P. 1984.<br />
Induced somatic pairing and chromosomal aberrations in Cuminum<br />
cyminum L.J.Pl.Nature, 1(2): 83-86.<br />
Morimoto, K. Iijima, S. and Koizumi, A. 1982. Selenite prevents the<br />
induction of sister chromatid exchange by methyl mercury and<br />
mercuric chloride in human whole blood cultures. Mutation Res.
92 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
102: 183-192.<br />
Park, R.J. and Sutherland, M.D. 1962. Volatile constituents of the<br />
bronze organe bug, Rhoecocoris sulciventris. Aust. J. Chem., 15:<br />
172.<br />
Ragunathan I., Panneer Selvam U. 2007. Anti mutagenic potential of<br />
curcumin on chromosomal aberralions is Allium cepa J. Zhejiang<br />
Univ. Sci. B. Jul: 8(7): 470-5.<br />
Ray, J.H. Attenbury, L.C. and Jocobs, M.M. 1978. Effect of sodium<br />
selenite and methyl metathene sulfonate or N-hydroxyl-2 acetyl<br />
amino fluorence co-exposure on sister-chromotid exchange<br />
production whole blood cultures, Mutation Res., 57: 359-368.<br />
Rendi, R. and Ochae, S. 1962. Effects of chloromphenicol on protein<br />
synthesis in cell free preparation of E. coli Bio. Chem., 237: 3711-<br />
3713.<br />
Sadanandam, A., V. Venkata Rajam, M. Subash, K. and Rajanarender, E.<br />
1984. Ptoduction of chromosomal breaks by isoxazolidine- one in<br />
Allium sativum L. Indian Bot. Reptr., 3(1): 38-42.<br />
Sadasivaiah, R.S. Collius, G.B. and Davis, D.L. 1973. Effect of LSD on<br />
mitotic and meiotic plant chromosomes. Chromosoma, 44:309-<br />
318.<br />
Sagoo, M.I.S. Kumari, S. Bindu. 1993. Mitotic effects of stem decoction<br />
of Ephedia foliate on Allium cepa root. tips. J. Cytol. Genet., 28:<br />
81-83.<br />
Schaurenstein, E. Esterbauer, H. and Zollner, H. 1987. Aldehydes in<br />
Biological systems, their natural occurrence and biological activities<br />
(ed. J.R. Langnado) Pion Limited, London.<br />
Sessa, A. Scalabrino, G. Arnaboldi, A. and Perin, A. 1977. Effects of<br />
aliphatic aldehydes metabolism of protein synthesis and thiol<br />
compounds in rat liver and hepatoma induced by 4-dimethyl amino<br />
azobenzene. Cancer. Res. 37: 2170-2176.<br />
Staddon, B.W. and Thorne, M.J. 1973. Constituents of the stink gland<br />
of the water bug Ilyocoiris cimiccides (L.) (Heteroptera: Naucoridae).<br />
Tetrahedron Letters. N. 46:4567-4571.<br />
Surender, P. Mogili, T. Thirupathi, D. Janaiah, C. and Vidyavati. 1987.<br />
Effect of scent components on somatic cells of Allium sativum L.<br />
Curr. Sci., 56:964-967.<br />
Surender, P. Janaiah, C. Krishna Reddy, V. and Reddy, S.M. 1988.<br />
Bactericidal activity of certain volatile scent components of<br />
heteropteran bugs. Proc. Indian Nath. Sci. Acad. B., 54: 315-316.<br />
Surender, P. Janaiah, C. Krishna Reddy, V. and Reddy, S.M. 1987.<br />
Antifungal activity of secretion of scent glands from heteropteran<br />
bugs. Indian J. Exp Biol., 25: 233-234.<br />
Watanuki, M. and Sakaguchi, K. 1981. Glucose dependent growth inhibit<br />
of SV-40 transfored rat cells with benzaldehyde, Agr. Biol. Chem.,<br />
45: 319-321.<br />
Recieved on 16-12-2012 Accepted on 02-02-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 93-94, <strong>2013</strong><br />
A Study on the Quality of Milk in Gwalior<br />
CHANDANA JA<strong>IN</strong> AND RITU MEDIRATTA<br />
Department of Life Science, Boston College for Professional Studies, Gwalior, M.P.<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
The study was carried out to know the quality of milk distributed<br />
and consumed in Gwalior. Area of study was Gwalior city and<br />
adjoining rural area. A total number of 80 samples were<br />
collected of which 32 were from Gwalior city and 48 were from<br />
adjoining rural area which feeds milk to Gwalior city. All the<br />
samples were analyzed for different adulterants. 40% samples<br />
in urban area and 20.83% samples in rural area were found to<br />
be adulterated with water. The milk consumed in urban area<br />
was highly adulterated as compared to rural area milk. In<br />
Gwalior urban area 6.25% samples for Ammonium Sulphate,<br />
15.62% samples for added urea, 18.75% samples for<br />
Formaldehyde, and 15.62% samples for detergent were found<br />
to be positive. 25% samples in Gwalior city found to be<br />
adulterated with skimmed milk as compared to 2.08% in rural<br />
area. None of the sample was found to be adulterated with cane<br />
sugar, starch and added glucose.<br />
Key words<br />
Quality, milk, Gwalior, adulteration<br />
Milk is almost a complete food. It is an excellent source<br />
of protein, fat, carbohydrates, minerals and vitamins.<br />
Adulterated milk is harmful for human consumption. In most<br />
developing countries, food safety systems are dysfunctional<br />
and despite increasing concern most of rural populations are<br />
unaware of adulteration. India is no exception. Despite the<br />
laws governing the control of quality and sale of milk existing<br />
in India for decades, the adulteration of milk has not been<br />
checked completely. Adulterant like cane sugar, starch,<br />
glucose, ammonium sulphate, urea, NaCl, skimmed milk powder,<br />
pulverized soap, detergents and chemical like formalin,<br />
hydrogen peroxide are added to the milk. These adulterants<br />
are poisonous and cause health hazards. Milk is mixed with<br />
toxic additives like Urea to increase the consistency and it is<br />
also said that such adulterated milk remains intact even for 2<br />
or more days while ordinary milk goes sour in a day. Urea is a<br />
natural constituent of milk is present extent of 700 ppm so it’s<br />
detection as a adulterant is not easy. Above 700 ppm of urea<br />
indicate the urea is added in milk as adulterant. Pal, 1963<br />
conducted a survey in Ludhiana showed the adulteration<br />
figure as 15.9% out of 4597 samples of milk. Other surveys<br />
conducted by Zariwala, et al., in Bombay, Karpude, et. al.,<br />
1987 in Parbhani town also showed the extensive problem of<br />
adulteration in milk. Hence this study has been planned to<br />
know the extent of adulteration of milk received from various<br />
milk outlets of the city. These adulterant are not allowed<br />
according of P.F.A. (Prevention of Food Adulterants)<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
80 milk samples were collected from different outlets of<br />
milk in the city from 5 location, including co-operative dairy<br />
outlets and private organization from of the Gwalior city i.e.<br />
urban areas and adjoin rural area of Gwalior city. This study<br />
was carried out in the summer of year 2010 and 2011 (40<br />
samples each year). Sample study had been done on the same<br />
day. Samples were collected randomly in the morning and<br />
transported to the lab. After the preparation of sample organo<br />
leptic test, correct lactometer reading (C.L.R), clot on boiling<br />
test and alcohol test for stability of milk were performed<br />
immediately in the lab. All the tests of detection of adulterates<br />
i.e., cane sugar, starch, added glucose, ammonium sulphate,<br />
urea, sodium chloride, skimmed milk powder, pulverized soap,<br />
detergents, preservatives like hydrogen peroxide, formalin<br />
were carried out qualitatively.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Presence of adulterants in milk samples collected from<br />
different sources of each location of Gwalior presented in<br />
Table 1. It is evident from the Table 1 that a many of the<br />
samples were found to be adulterated. It has been observed<br />
that the maximum milk samples collected from both urban areas<br />
and nearby rural areas were found to be adulterated with water.<br />
None of the sample was detected positive for cane sugar,<br />
glucose and starch (Table 1). These observations are in<br />
agreement with those by Mishra, et al., 1997, Patel, 1997 and<br />
Wadekar, et.al., 2011 observed that none of the milk simples<br />
was found to be adulterated with starch and glucose.<br />
Urea and detergent were detected as an adulterant and<br />
it was found that urea and detergent were present in 15.62%<br />
samples in urban area and 10.41% samples in rural area were<br />
found to be adulterated with urea. It showed that more number<br />
of sample from urban area were adulterated with urea and<br />
detergent than rural of nearby city. The higher number of urea<br />
and detergent was detected in Morar area of the city.<br />
Use of preservatives like hydrogen peroxide and<br />
formaldehyde to reduce bacteria count was also observed in<br />
samples both from urban as well rural areas to increase keeping<br />
quality of milk. Formaldehyde was detected in 18.75% samples<br />
both in urban and rural area. Whereas hydrogen peroxide was<br />
detected in 3.10% samples in urban area only. No sample tested<br />
positive in rural area. Arora, et al., 2004 observed that the<br />
0.4% milk samples collected form organized and unorganized<br />
sector were positive for formalin test. Bansal and Singhal,<br />
1991 reported that the addition of formalin even at low levels<br />
completely inhibited the proliferation of any bacteria in the<br />
milk. In a study Wadekar, et al., 2011 also observed that 12%<br />
samples in summer and 10% samples in rainy season in Nanded<br />
were adulterated with formaldehyde. Maximum milk samples
94 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
Table 1.<br />
Tested for<br />
Presence of adulterants in milk (No. of samples)<br />
Lashkar(U) Morar(U) Sirol(R) Banmor(R) Alapore(R)<br />
No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of<br />
samples samples samples samples samples samples samples samples<br />
found found found found found found found found<br />
negative positive negative positive negative positive negative positive<br />
No. of<br />
samples<br />
found<br />
positive<br />
No. of<br />
samples<br />
found<br />
Total No. of<br />
samples found<br />
positive<br />
negative Urban Rural<br />
COB 0 16 0 16 0 16 0 16 0 16 0 0<br />
Stability test 16 0 16 0 16 0 16 0 16 0 32 48<br />
Water test 7 9 6 10 4 12 2 14 4 12 13 10<br />
(CLR)<br />
Cane Sugar 0 16 0 16 0 16 0 16 0 16 0 0<br />
Starch 0 16 0 16 0 16 0 16 0 16 0 0<br />
Glucose 0 16 0 16 0 16 0 16 0 16 0 0<br />
Ammonium 1 15 1 15 0 16 0 16 1 15 2 1<br />
Sulphate<br />
Added Urea 3 13 2 14 1 15 3 13 1 15 5 5<br />
Sodium<br />
1 15 0 16 1 15 3 13 1 15 1 5<br />
Chloride<br />
Hydrogen 0 16 1 15 0 16 0 16 0 16 1 0<br />
peroxide<br />
Formalin 4 12 2 14 2 14 5 11 2 14 6 9<br />
Skimmed milk 5 11 3 13 0 16 1 15 0 16 8 1<br />
powder<br />
Pulverized soap 2 14 0 16 0 16 1 15 0 16 2 1<br />
Detergent 2 14 3 13 1 15 2 14 1 15 5 4<br />
detected positive for formalin were from Banmore rural area<br />
adjacent to Gwalior. From Banmore 5 out of 16 samples were<br />
positive.<br />
Results indicate that skimmed milk powder is more<br />
common adulterant in urban area as compared to rural area.<br />
Presence of skimmed milk powder was detected in 25% milk<br />
samples collected from Gwalior urban area i.e. Lashkar and<br />
Morar. Whereas only 2.08% i.e. only one milk sample found<br />
to be adulterated with skimmed milk powder in rural area. It<br />
showed that milk brought from rural area was reprocessed to<br />
increase SNF value of milk and then sold in city. Arora, et al.,<br />
2004 also agreed with the results that milk is collected from<br />
vendors and then reprocessed to increase SNF value.<br />
Table 2.<br />
Incidence of adulterants (% positive samples) in<br />
milk obtained from various sources.<br />
Tested for<br />
Samples found positive Over all<br />
Urban (U)<br />
%<br />
Rural (R)<br />
%<br />
percentage<br />
of positive samples<br />
COB 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Stability test 100.00 100.00 100.00<br />
Water test (CLR) 40.00 20.83 31.41<br />
Cane Sugar 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Starch 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Glucose 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Ammonium Sulphate 6.25 2.08 4.16<br />
Added Urea 15.62 10.41 13.01<br />
Sodium Chloride 3.12 10.41 6.76<br />
Hydrogen peroxide 3.12 0.00 1.56<br />
Formalin 18.75 18.75 18.75<br />
Skimmed milk powder 25.00 2.08 13.54<br />
Pulverized soap 6.25 2.08 4.16<br />
Detergent 15.62 8.33 11.97<br />
Samples were also tested for adulteration with pulverized<br />
soap. For pulverized soap only one sample in Alapore rural<br />
area of Gwalior was found to be positive out of total 80 samples.<br />
Results indicate that ammonium sulphate and sodium chloride<br />
are less frequently used as an adulterant in milk as three<br />
samples tested positive for Ammonium sulphate where 6.75%<br />
samples found adulterated with sodium chloride.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Arora, S., Sharma, V. Des Raj, Motiram and Kishore, K. 2004. Status of<br />
milk adulteration in some states of North India. Indian J.Dairy<br />
Sci., 57(1): 65.<br />
Bansal, A. and Singhal, O.P. 1991. Preservation of milk samples with<br />
formalin-Effect on Acidity. Indian J. Dairy Sci., 44(9): 573.<br />
Karpude, A.A., Rathi, S.D., Joglekar, N.V. and Ingle, U.M. 1987.<br />
Adulterated Milk sold in Parbhani town. Asian J. Dairy Res. 6(2):<br />
83-86.<br />
Mishra, M., Dehury, M., and Nayak, J.B. 1977. Adulteration of market<br />
milk at Bhubaneswar. Indian J.Vet. Sci. pp. 378-380.<br />
Pal, R.N. 1963. Milk adulteration in Ludhiana city. Indian J. Dairy<br />
Sci., 16:92-97.<br />
Patel, R.K. 1979. A study on the quality of milk collected at different<br />
collection centers. Dairy guide, pp.27.<br />
Wadekar, S.B., Chavan, B.R. and Menkunale, G.V. 2011. Survey on<br />
adulteration of the milk received from Government milk scheme<br />
in Nanded town. Interlink Research Analysis, 1(4): 32-35.<br />
Zariwala, T.T., Sharma, U.P. and Gayakwad, K.S. 1976. Survey of quality<br />
of Milk in Bombay. Indian J. Dariy Sci. pp. 105-118.<br />
Recieved on 14-09-2012 Accepted on 15-12-2012
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 95-96, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Prediction of Lifetime Milk Production from Early Lactation Traits in Crossbred<br />
Cattle<br />
HEMANT KUMAR 1 AND B.K. HOODA<br />
CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125 001<br />
e-mail: rushtohemant@rediffmail.com 1<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
The first and second lactation traits of 158 crossbred cattle has<br />
been analyzed for prediction of life time milk production (LTP3)<br />
of crossbred cattle. On the basis of individually first and second<br />
lactation traits the lactation milk yield (LMY) and lactation<br />
length (LL) are important traits for prediction of lifetime milk<br />
production. When we consider all the first and second lactation<br />
traits including age at first calving the R 2 and R A<br />
2<br />
were found<br />
0.872 and 0.862 respectively, and finally traits LMY 1, LMY 2,<br />
LL 1, LL 2, SP 1, SP 2, DP 1 and DP 2 were selected in the model<br />
by using backward elimination method of regression analysis.<br />
Key words<br />
Crossbred cattle, backward elimination, regression,<br />
coefficient of determination (R 2 ), Correlation.<br />
The overall productivity of dairy animals depends upon<br />
their lifetime performance rather than on a single lactation<br />
performance. Ultimate aim of the dairy producers is to maximize<br />
milk production and profitability, therefore lifetime milk<br />
production is an important economic trait. Improvement of<br />
lifetime milk production through early selection of females<br />
would be desirable because waiting for an actual estimate of<br />
this trait not only delays selection decision but also reduces<br />
rate of genetic progress, in addition to high cost of maintaining<br />
poor producers. Generation interval and expenses involved<br />
in maintaining less productive animals could be reduced if the<br />
animals are selected for lifetime productivity on the basis of<br />
traits expressed in their early lifetime. Many workers have<br />
predicted the lifetime production on the basis of early<br />
performance traits in different breed of cattle and buffalo e.g.<br />
Pathodia, et al., 2003, Dalal, et al., 204, Gandhi, et al., 2009,<br />
and Shinde, et al., 2010. Hence this study was planned to<br />
project the lifetime milk production from first and second<br />
lactation traits in crossbred cattle.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Data pertaining to 158 crossbred cattle from the history cum<br />
pedigree sheet maintained in the department of Animal<br />
Genetics and Breeding, Lala Lajpat Rai University of veterinary<br />
and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana for a period of 24 years<br />
(1985 to 2009) were used for this study.<br />
Lactation traits were taken this study were age at first calving<br />
(AFC), lactation milk yield (LMY1, LMY2), lactation length<br />
(LL1 and LL2), service period (SP1 and SP2), dry period (DP1<br />
and DP2), calving interval (CI1 and CI2). Only those animals<br />
were included in this study which has completed three<br />
lactations milk yield. The lifetime milk production (LTP3) was<br />
defined as total amount of milk produced by cattle from the<br />
initiation of first lactation till the completion of third lactation.<br />
The pearsonian correlation of first and second lactation traits<br />
with LTP3 was calculated and it was predicted using backward<br />
elimination method of multiple regression analysis (Draper<br />
and Smith, 1987) by SPSS software. To predict LTP3, we<br />
consider 3 set a explanatory variables in the models and<br />
analyzed using backward elimination procedure of multiple<br />
regression analysis. In first set only first lactation traits and<br />
AFC are included in the prediction equation, in the second<br />
set only second lactation traits and AFC were included and<br />
finally in third set all the first and second lactation traits<br />
including AFC were considered.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The Correlation coefficients (Table 1) of LTP 3 with<br />
LMY1, LMY2, LL1, LL2, and SP2 were positive and significant,<br />
and with DP1 and DP2 were negative significant. The<br />
correlation of LTP3 with AFC is negative but not significant<br />
and with other variables i.e. CI1, CI2 and SP1 were positive<br />
and non-significant.<br />
To predict LTP3, when all the traits of first set were<br />
incorporated in the model, the accuracy of prediction (R 2 ) and<br />
adjusted R-square (R A2<br />
) were 0.645 and 0.631 respectively and<br />
only LMY1 was signifianct. Finally LMY1 and LL1 were<br />
selected in the model by backward eliminatio method in the<br />
first set and R 2 and R A<br />
2<br />
was estimated 0.633 and 0.628<br />
respectively. Similar result was found for the second set<br />
Table 1.<br />
Phenotypic correlation of early lactation traits with<br />
LTP3<br />
Early lactation traits<br />
Correlation with LTP3<br />
LMY1 0.791**<br />
LMY2 0.855**<br />
AFC -0.099<br />
LL1 0.589**<br />
LL2 0.440**<br />
CI1 0.144<br />
CI2 0.120<br />
SP1 0.145<br />
SP2 0.178*<br />
DP1 -0.361**<br />
DP2 -0.170<br />
*Significant at 5%, **Significant at 1%
96 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
Table 2.<br />
Regression equation estimated by backward elimination method<br />
Set Step Equation R 2 2<br />
R A<br />
One First LTP3 = 5934.280 + 2.145LMY1** - 0.065AFC - 4.321LL1 - 6.554CI1 + 7.998SP1 - 2.768DP1 0.645 0.631<br />
Final LTP3 = 3359 + 2.208LMY1** - 3.178LL1 0.633 0.628<br />
Two First LTP3 = 2222.046 + 2.740LMY2** + 0.139AFC - 6.557**LL2 – 0.229CI2 + 2.394SP2 - 1.584DP2 0.754 0.744<br />
Final LTP3 = 1934.768 + 2.754LMY2** - 4.983LL2 0.748 0.745<br />
Three First LTP3 = 3103.855 + 1.263LMY1** + 1.731LMY2** + 0.187AFC - 4.4514LL1* - 4.081Ll2* - 822CI1 + 0.14CI2 + 3.823SP1 + 0.872 0.862<br />
2.9SP2* - 2.827DP1* - 3.551DP2*<br />
Final LTP3 = 2899.237 + 1.249LMY1** + 1.725LMY2** - 4.630LL1** - 3.981LL2** + 2.194SP1 + 2.984SP2** - 3.044DP1* - 0.871 0.864<br />
3.517DP2**<br />
*Significant at 5%, **Significant at 1%<br />
regarding significance of traits when all the traits included in<br />
the model i.e. only LMY2 was signifianct and R 2 and R A<br />
2<br />
was<br />
estimated 0.754 and 0.744. Finally LMY2 and LL2 were selected<br />
in the model for the second set and R 2 and R A<br />
2<br />
were 0.748 and<br />
0.745. So we can say that on the basis of individually first and<br />
second lactation traits the lactation milk yield and lactation<br />
length are important traits for prediction of lifetime milk<br />
production. When we consider third set in which all the first<br />
and second lactation trait were involved including AFC the R 2<br />
and R A<br />
2<br />
were 0.872 and 0.862 respectively, and finally LMY1,<br />
LMY2, LL1, LL2, SP1, SP2, DP1 and DP2 were selected in the<br />
model and the R 2 and R A<br />
2<br />
were 0.871 and 0.864 respectively.<br />
From Table 2 it reveals that there is numerous improvement in<br />
R 2 and R A<br />
2<br />
in third set as compared to first and second set, so<br />
we recommend final model of set 3 for prediction of lifetime<br />
milk production.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Dalal, D.S., Malik, Z.S., Chhikara, B.S. and Ramesh Chander. 2004.<br />
Prediction of lifetime milk production from early lactation trait in<br />
Hariana cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 74(11): 1145-<br />
1149.<br />
Darper, N.R. and Smith, H. 1987. Applied Regression Analysis. John<br />
Wiley and Sons Inc., New Yark.<br />
Gandhi, R.S., Raja, T.V., Ruhil, A.P. and Kumar, A. 2009. Prediction of<br />
lifetime milk production using artificial neural network in sahiwal<br />
cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 79(10): 1038-1040.<br />
Pathodia, O.P., Tailor, S.P. and Jain, L.S. 2003. Projection of lifetime<br />
prediction from early available traits in Surti buffalo for Food Security<br />
and Rural Employment held at Delhi, 2:107.<br />
Pundir, R.K. and Raheja K.L. 1995. Prediction of lifetime milk yield by<br />
early traits in sahiwal and Hariana cows. Indian Journal of Dairy<br />
Science, 48: 146-49.<br />
Shinde, N.V., Mote, M.G., Khutal, B.B. and Jagtap, D.Z. 2010. Prediction<br />
of lifetime milk production on the basis of lactation traits in Phle<br />
Triveni crossbred cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 80(10):<br />
986-988.<br />
Recieved on 25-02-<strong>2013</strong> Accepted on 01-03-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 97-98, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Fungal Growth on C1 Compounds: A Study of the Amino Acid Composition of a<br />
Methanol-utilizing Strain of Trichoderma viride 01 PP<br />
MOHD. SHAHID, MUKESH SRIVASTVA, ANURADHA S<strong>IN</strong>GH AND 1 NEELAM PATHAK<br />
Department of Plant Pathology, C.S. Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur 208 002<br />
1<br />
Department of Biosciences, Integral University, Kursi Road, Lucknow<br />
email: shahid.biotech@rediffmail.com<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
The amino acid composition of the C,-utilizing fungus<br />
Trichoderma viride 01 PP, growing at the expense of methanol<br />
as the sole source of carbon, was determined. With the exception<br />
of an insufficient content of methionine, the essential amino<br />
acid composition of this novel protein source appears adequate<br />
in terms of the Food and Agricultural Organization Reference<br />
Protein for both direct and indirect use in the human diet as a<br />
food or animal feed, respectively.<br />
Key word<br />
Trichoderma, amino acid, protein, FAO<br />
The exploitation of Cl-utilizing bacteria as a potential<br />
source of dietary protein for animals is under active<br />
development (Champagnat, 1974, Cooneyad and Levine, 1972).<br />
As a consequence of this interest, the amino acid composition<br />
of the protein from several methanol-utilizing and methaneutilizing<br />
bacteria (D’Mello, 1972) has been determined: almost<br />
all of these prokaryotes contained an essential amino acid<br />
complement compatible with their successful adaption as a<br />
nutritionally beneficial dietary protein for animals. Particularly<br />
significant in this respect was the fact that several such<br />
prokaryotic protein sources contained a higher percentage of<br />
methionine than conventional dietary plant proteins, such as<br />
soyabean meal, or novel proteins, such as British Petroleum<br />
(BP) yeast concentrate. The recent isolation of a methanolutilizing<br />
strain of the fungus Trichoderma viride 01 PP (10; R.<br />
J. Tye and A. J. Willetts, J. Appl. Bacteriol.) presents the<br />
possibility of exploiting mycelial protein produced by this<br />
eukaryotic microorganism as a source of dietary protein for<br />
animals. Fungi offer several advantages over bacteria in this<br />
respect, including a significantly lower nucleic acid-protein<br />
ratio and comparatively lower harvesting costs from spent<br />
media. The present investigation, conducted to examine the<br />
protein and amino acid composition of the methanol-utilizing<br />
fungus T. viride 01 PP, was a pertinent contribution towards a<br />
rational assessment of this possibility.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
The isolation, maintenance, and growth of the fungus,<br />
identified as a strain of T. viride 01 PP, were as previously<br />
described (10; Tye and Willetts, in press). Analytical methods.<br />
Amino acid analyses were made using a modification of the<br />
method described by D’Mello, 1972: 10 mg of methanol-grown<br />
fungal mycelium was hydrolyzed by autoclaving for 15 h at<br />
115 C in 5 ml of 6 N HC1 in a sealed glass ampoule under<br />
nitrogen. The hydrolysate was made up to 100 ml in a<br />
volumetric flask with deionized water and bsequently filtered<br />
twice through a sintered glass funnel. A 10-ml aliquot was<br />
evaporated to dryness in a rotary evaporator. The residue<br />
was taken up in 2 ml of 10% sucrose in 0.1 N HCl and analyzed<br />
for amino acids using a autoanalyzer. 2,4,6-Trinitrobenzene<br />
sulphonic acid was used as the developing reagent. Cystine<br />
was determined by the method of Moore, 1963 and tryptophan<br />
was analyzed in alkaline hydrolysates (Inglis and Leaver, 1964).<br />
The nitrogen content of the fungal mycelium was established<br />
by the classical Kjeldahl method (Kilbrg, 1972). Chitin,<br />
Bluementhal and Raseman, 1957 and nucleic acid Ohta, et al.,<br />
1971 levels were assayed as previously described.<br />
The nitrogen content of the mycelium of methanol-grown<br />
T. viride 01 PP was 9.82% of N, which was equivalent to a<br />
protein content of 61.4% (N x 6.25). Growth conditions which<br />
promote a high mycelial protein content are currently under<br />
investigation. The content of all of the individual amino acids<br />
in the protein of the fungal mycelium after growth on methanol<br />
was remarkably consistent (Table 1). The essential amino acid<br />
content compared favorably with the 1957 Food and<br />
Agricultural Organisation (FAO) standard reference protein<br />
in most aspects; the one notable exception was a deficiency<br />
with respect to methionine (Table 2). The mycelial protein of<br />
methanol-grown T. viride 01 PP also compared favorably with<br />
whole wheat protein, domestic fowl egg protein, and the<br />
proteins from several other microbial sources (Table 2). Over<br />
80% of the total nitrogen compounds present in the mycelium<br />
of methanol-grown T. viride 01 PP was recovered as amino<br />
acids during a quantitative analysis after acid hydrolysis. The<br />
chitin and nucleic acid contents of the mycelium of methanolgrown<br />
T. viride 01 PP were 3.8 and 5.1%, respectively.<br />
RESLULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The results indicate that the fungus T. viride 01 PP<br />
growing at the expense of methanol as the sole source of<br />
utilizable carbon produces mycelia protein with a spectrum of<br />
essential amino acids superior in all but one respect to the<br />
FAO Reference Protein: the one major deficit ofmethanolgrown<br />
fungal protein is a subminimal methionine content,<br />
which shows a 15% shortfall with respect to the FAO standard.<br />
However, as indicated in Table 2, the methionine content of<br />
the mycelial protein of methanol-grown T. viride 01 PP (1.85
98 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
g/16 g of N), although below the level in FAO Reference<br />
Protein, is nevertheless in excess of the content of many other<br />
sources of dietary protein including conventional plant<br />
proteins such as whole wheat protein (1.5 g/16 g of N) and<br />
soyabean meal (1.2 to 1.4 g/16 g of N), as well as other novel<br />
proteins such as BP yeast concentrate (1.4 to 1.6 g/16 g of N)<br />
and gas oilgrown Candida lipolyticum (1.6 g/16 g of N). Any<br />
dietary deficiency resulting from this subminimal content of<br />
methionine could be avoided by using mycelial protein from<br />
methanol-grown T. viride 01 PP as the basis for a balanced<br />
food or feed incorporating compensatory amounts of either<br />
pure methionine or methionine-rich proteins such as domestic<br />
chicken egg protein (Table 2).<br />
The mycelial protein of methanol-grown T. viride 01 PP<br />
has an acceptable complement of all other essential amino<br />
acids, including lysine,as assessed against the FAO standard,<br />
as well as a full complement of non-essential amino acids<br />
(Table 1). The complement of arginine and histidine, two amino<br />
acids which are not catagorized as essential human dietary<br />
components, but supplementary sources of which are widely<br />
considered necessary for the normal growth of children, is<br />
similar to that of many conventional dietary proteins. The<br />
amino acid composition of the mycelia protein of methanolgrown<br />
T. viride 01 PP is similar to that of several methanegrown<br />
bacteria; the comparatively high content of tryptophan<br />
is particularly significant in this respect.<br />
Table 1. Amino acid content of methanol-grown T. viride<br />
01 PP<br />
Mean amino acid con-<br />
Amino acid tent (g/16 g of N) ±<br />
standard deviation<br />
Alanine ...................... 6.80 ± 0.20<br />
Arginine ..................... 4.92 ± 0.16<br />
Aspartic acid ................. 8.63 ± 0.19<br />
Cystine ...................... 0.90 ± 0.08<br />
Glutamic acid ................ 10.03 ± 0.22<br />
Glycine ...................... 4.87 ± 0.09<br />
Histidine ..................... 2.03 ± 0.12<br />
Isoleucine .................... 4.48 ± 0.09<br />
Leucine ...................... 7.88 ± 0.11<br />
Lysine ....................... 5.13 + 0.09<br />
Methionine ................... 1.85 ± 0.08<br />
Phenylalanine ................ 4.38 ± 0.08<br />
Serine ....................... 3.48 ± 0.09<br />
Threonine .................... 4.62 ± 0.11<br />
Tryptophan .................. 1.82 ± 0.08<br />
Tyrosine ..................... 3.65 ± 0.08<br />
Valine ....................... 5.72 ± 0.10<br />
a Average of six experiments.<br />
Table 2. Essential amino acid content ofmethanol-grown<br />
T. viride 01 PP, FAO Reference Protein, wheat, egg,and some<br />
other established microbial protein sources (expressed as g116<br />
g of N)Scene- Saccha- C. lipo- Psu FAO Amino acid lignTo.rum<br />
deosbm-us mrausxliinmaa roccmeeyreec-es ly (gtiscgaas<br />
(dmoemtohnana- s Wwhhoelaet Wheoglge Reenfecre-<br />
(methanol) Iiquus (6) visiae oil) (6) (6) (6) Protein<br />
(6) (6) (6) (6)<br />
Isoleucine 4.48, 3.8, 6.0, 4.6, 5.3, 3.9, 3.3 ,6.7 ,4.2<br />
Leucine 7.88, 8.4, 8.0, 7.0, 7.8, 7.0, 6.7, 8.9, 4.8<br />
Lysine 5.13, 5.7, 4.6, 7.7, 7.8, 5.3, 2.8, 6.5, 4.2<br />
Methionine 1.85 ,1.7, 1.4, 1.7, 1.6, 1.8, 1.5, 3.2, 2.2<br />
Phenylalanine 4.38, 5.1, 5.0, 4.1, 4.8, 4.2, 4.5, 5.8, 2.8<br />
Threonine 4.62, 5.1, 4.6, 4.8, 5.4, 4.5, 2.9, 5.1, 2.8<br />
Tryptophan 1.82 ,1.5 ,1.4, 1.0, 1.3 ,1.1, 1.6, 1.4<br />
Valine 5.72, 5.7, 6.5, 5.3, 5.8, 5.9, 4.4, 7.3, 4.2<br />
mycelial protein from methanol-grown T. viride 01 PP as<br />
a food or feed remain to be assessed directly.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />
The paper forms a part of the Ph.D work of the first<br />
author and the facilities provided by Department of Plant<br />
Pathology, CS Azad University of Technology & Agriculture,<br />
Kanpur for the conduct of this study is gratefully<br />
acknowledged.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Blumenthal, H.J., and Roseman, S. 1957. Quantitative estimation of<br />
chitin in fungi. J. Bacteriol., 74:222-229.<br />
Champagnat, A. 1974. Proteins from hydrocarbons, In: Industrial<br />
aspects of biochemistry. (ed. B. Spencer), Federation of European<br />
Biochemical Societies. pp.342-353.<br />
Cooney, C.L. and Levine, D.W. 1972. Microbial utilization of methanol.<br />
Adv. Appl. Microbiol., 15:337-365.<br />
D’Mello, J.P.F. 1972. A study of the amino acid composition of methane<br />
utilising bacteria. J. Appl. Bacteriol., 35:145-148.<br />
Inglis, A.S. and Leaver, I.H. 1964. Studies in the determination of<br />
tryptophan. Modified Fischl procedure. Anal. Biochem., 7:10-14.<br />
Kilberg, R. 1972. The microbe as a source of food. Annu. Rev. Microbiol.,<br />
26:427-466.<br />
Miller, L. and Houghton, J.A. 1945. The micro-Kjeldahl determination<br />
of the nitrogen content of amino acids and proteins. J. Biol. Chem.,<br />
159:373-383.<br />
Moore, S. 1963. On the determination of cystine as cysteic acid. J.<br />
Biol. Chem. 238:235-237.<br />
Ohta, S., Maul, S., Sinskey, A.J. and Tannenbaum, S.R. 1971.<br />
Characterization of a heat-shock process for reduction of the nucleic<br />
acid content of Candida utilis. Appl. Microbiol., 22:415-421.<br />
Recieved on 14-01-<strong>2013</strong> Accepted on 25-02-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 99-100, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Varietal Evaluation of Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.) In Allahabad<br />
Agro – climatic Condition<br />
MUKESH YADAV, V.M. PRASAD, AND CHANDAN S<strong>IN</strong>GH AHIRWAR<br />
Department of Horticulture Allahabad School of Agriculture<br />
Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture, Technology & Sciences, Allahabad 211 007<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
The investigation consisted 15 cauliflower hybrid variety and<br />
laid out in randomized block design with three replication.<br />
Observation recorded on plant height, leaves, spread curd,<br />
size and yield attributes during the investigation. Amongst all<br />
the cauliflower hybrid variety evaluated for growth, yield and<br />
quality trails is present investigation wich revealed that the<br />
variety poorninma had highest plant height (24.64cm), Number<br />
of leaves per plant (20.83) plant spread (65.79cm), diameter of<br />
curd (18.92cm), weight of untrimmed curd (2.450 kg), weight of<br />
trimmed curd (1001.67g), curd yield (345.083 ha -1 ) vitamin – C<br />
(53.93mg/100g each) and moisture – dry matter ratio (7.85).<br />
For growth yield and quality character hybrid variety poornima<br />
is recommended for commercial cultivation in winter season<br />
of Allahabad agro – climatic condition.<br />
Key words<br />
Brassica oleracea. var. botrytis, vitamin – C, moisture<br />
dry matter ratio<br />
Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea, var botrytis L.) is a very<br />
popular vegetable belonging to cole group of vegetable. It is<br />
a member of crucifarae family and is characterized by petals,<br />
standing opposite to each other in a square cross. 6 stamens<br />
of which 4 are long and 2 are short. It has basic chromosome<br />
number (n=9). Cauliflower has both annual and biennial types,<br />
but in India only annuals are cultivated.<br />
Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.) is another<br />
popular crucifer grown mainly in cooler areas. It is steamed,<br />
stir fried, or pickled. Cauliflower is grown in 1,017 ha, mainly in<br />
llocos Sur (450 ha) and Benguet (340 ha) (Bureau of<br />
Agricultural Statistics 2005). Nutritional Value Per 100 g fresh<br />
edible portion, Cauliflower curd contains: Water (g) – 88.0,<br />
Protein (g) – 4.0, Fat(g) – 0.30, Carbohydrates (g) – 6.0, Fiber<br />
(g) – 1.5, Calcium (mg) – 1 50, Potassium (mg) – 325, Carotene<br />
(mg) – 800, Vitamin C (mg) – 100, Energy Value (kj) – 245.<br />
Values are similar for cauliflower except for its lower calcium<br />
(25 mg), carotene (200 mg), and vitamin C (40 mg) contents.<br />
MATERIALS OF AND METHODS<br />
The experiment was carried out in Vegetable Research<br />
Farm, Department of Horticulture, Allahabad School of<br />
Agriculture, SHIATS, Allahabad. The 15 cauliflower hybrids<br />
viz., Aghani, Kinaya, Snow crown, Shalakha, Cashmere,<br />
Easley show, Kavita, Madhvi, NHB-Saritha, Sharad Safedhi<br />
70, Shigra, NHB 1011, Poornima, GS 75 and Girija were laid<br />
out in Randomized complete Block design with three<br />
replication. The spacing which was used in (50×45) all the<br />
agronomic packages and practices were adopted to grow good<br />
and healthy crop to get maximum yield. The observation<br />
recorded on Plant height (cm), Number of leaves (15, 30 and<br />
45DAT) , Plant spread (cm) , Diameter of curd (cm), Weight of<br />
untrimmed curd (kg), Weight of trimmed curd (g), Curd yield<br />
per plot (kg), Curd yield (q/ha.), Vitamin C (mg/100g of edible<br />
portion), Moisture – dry matter ratio and Economics of<br />
cultivation.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Among all the hybrid of cauliflower, Poornima was<br />
found best for all the growth parameters viz. maximum plant<br />
height (26.64 cm), max. no. of leaves (20.83), max. plant spread<br />
(65.79 cm). followed by the Kimaya had plant height (24.56<br />
cm), max. no. of leaves (20.75) and the max. plant spread (64.21<br />
cm). The above findings are supported by the findings of<br />
Ahmad, et al., 2003 for plant height and number of leaves and<br />
Tripathi and Sharma, 1991 for plant spread.<br />
Poornima also found superior over other hybrids in<br />
respect to yield parameter. The maximum curd diameter (18.92<br />
cm), max wt. of untrimmed and (2.450 kg), max at of trimmed<br />
used (1001.67 gm), and yield per plant (5.176 kg), total and<br />
yield per hac (345.083 q), were recorded for the Poornima.<br />
Followed by the Kimaya found good for the Kimaya had The<br />
maximum curd diameter (18.00 cm), max wt. of untrimmed (2.302<br />
kg) and max at of trimmed used (864.00 gm), and yield per<br />
plant (4.914 kg), total and yield per hac (327.00 q).The above<br />
findings are similar to the findings El-Rehim, et al., 2003 for<br />
diameter of curd (cm), weight of untrimmed and weight of<br />
trimmed curd (g) and Daljeet and Singh, 1990 for curd yield<br />
per plot (kg) and Vanparys, 1998 and Thamburaj, et al., 1980<br />
for curd yield (q ha -1 ).<br />
In respect to quality parameter i.e. vitamin – c and<br />
moisture-dry matter ratio the hybrid poornima showed<br />
superiority over all the hybrid i.e. 53.93 mg/100g edible portion<br />
and 7.85 respectively. Followed by the hybrid Kimaya had<br />
max. vit-c contain (53.57 mg/100g edibleportion) and moisturedry<br />
matte7.80. The above findings are supported by the finding<br />
of Thamburaj, et al., 1980 ascorbic acid (mg/100g of edible<br />
portion) and Wurr, et al., 1981 for moisture dry matter ration.<br />
Poornima recorded maximum gross return (172,542 Rs.
100 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
Table 1.<br />
Varieties<br />
Varietal evaluation of cauliflower (Brassica oleraceA var. botrytis L.) in Allahabad Agro-Climatic Condition<br />
Plant<br />
height<br />
(cm) 45<br />
DAS<br />
Number of<br />
leaves per<br />
plant 45<br />
DAS<br />
Plant<br />
spread<br />
(cm) 45<br />
DAS<br />
VI-VIS : Varites name given in Materials and Methods<br />
Diameter of<br />
curd (cm)<br />
Weight of<br />
untrimmed<br />
curd (kg)<br />
Weight of<br />
trimmed<br />
curd (g)<br />
Curd<br />
yield per<br />
plot (kg)<br />
Curd<br />
yield<br />
(q ha -1 )<br />
Vitamin C<br />
(mg / 100 g<br />
edible<br />
portion)<br />
Moisture -<br />
dry matter<br />
ratio<br />
V 1 21.23 18.50 57.41 16.08 2.124 793.33 4.538 302.507 50.97 7.35<br />
V 2 24.56 20.75 64.21 18.00 2.302 864.00 4.914 327.597 53.57 7.80<br />
V 3 17.06 15.50 49.34 13.88 0.963 461.67 3.093 206.197 48.77 6.98<br />
V 4 21.75 19.17 58.66 16.25 2.125 795.33 4.586 305.730 51.80 7.40<br />
V 5 19.16 16.50 55.01 15.86 1.892 730.00 4.369 291.283 50.43 7.26<br />
V 6 18.16 15.50 49.92 15.15 1.152 464.00 3.230 215.353 49.77 7.02<br />
V 7 22.45 19.58 62.30 17.45 2.225 855.67 4.808 320.527 52.93 7.78<br />
V 8 21.96 19.17 59.18 16.40 2.143 810.67 4.658 310.533 52.20 7.72<br />
V 9 19.86 16.67 55.08 15.88 2.030 733.00 4.399 293.240 50.53 7.29<br />
V 10 18.72 15.83 54.44 15.78 1.870 707.67 4.188 279.220 50.27 7.18<br />
V 11 21.99 19.50 59.35 17.29 2.196 823.67 4.698 313.217 52.43 7.73<br />
V 12 18.35 15.58 52.43 15.56 1.785 700.67 4.182 278.773 49.80 7.18<br />
V 13 24.64 20.83 65.79 18.92 2.450 1001.67 5.176 345.083 53.93 7.85<br />
V 14 20.19 16.83 56.59 15.96 2.052 740.00 4.459 297.263 50.60 7.32<br />
V 15 20.85 17.17 56.75 15.97 2.102 751.33 4.537 302.487 50.70 7.34<br />
ha -1 ), net return (125,215 Rs. ha -1 ) and Cost: Benefit ratio (1:<br />
3.65). Treatment (T 3<br />
) Snow Crown recorded the minimum<br />
gross return (103,098 Rs ha -1 ) and minimum net return ( 53,609<br />
Rs. ha -1 ) and Cost: Benefit ratio1: 2.08).<br />
Among all the treatments, (T 13<br />
) Poornima emerged as<br />
superior over all the other treatments, in relation to plant<br />
growth, yield attributing characters, quality parameters and<br />
economics of couliflower. The above findings are supported<br />
by the findings of Batra and Singh, 2002 and Sharma and<br />
Chandra, 2002 for Economics of different varieties.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Ahmad, S., Saha, S.R., Uddin, M.N., Choudhury, S.S., Awal, M.A. and<br />
Salam, M.A. 2003. Performance evaluation of some cauliflower<br />
genotypes in the eastern region of Bangladesh. Pakistan J. Bio.<br />
Sci., 6(21):1792-1794.<br />
Batra, V.K. and Singh, Jitendra. 2000. Evaluation of some cauliflower<br />
varieties at Hisar. Haryana J. Hort. Sci., 29(½):125-126.<br />
Singh, Daljeet, Thakur, J.C. and Singh, D. 1990. Performance of<br />
Cauliflower varieties. Haryana J. Hort. Sci., 19(3-4): 337-341.<br />
El-Rehim, G.H.A. 2003. Evaluation of yield and quality of newly<br />
produced cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.) genotype<br />
under Assiut conditions. Assit J. Agri. Sci., 34(5): 225-239.<br />
Sharma, A. and Chandra, A. 2002. Economic evaluation of different<br />
treatment combinations of plant spacing and nitrogen in cabbage<br />
and cauliflower. Current Agri., 26(½): 103-105.<br />
Thamburaj, S., Pillai, O.A.A., Anbu, S. and Shanmugavelu, K.G. 1980.<br />
Preliminary studies on the performance of certain varieties of<br />
Cauliflower (Ioleracea Var. Botrytis L.) at Coimbatore, South India<br />
Hort., 28(3): 82-84.<br />
Tripathi, P.K. and Sharma, R.K. 1991. Studies on the effect of Age of<br />
Seedling and Spacing of the growth and yield of cauliflower (Brassica<br />
oleraea Var. Botrytis. L.). New Agri., 1(2): 177-182.<br />
Vanparys, L. 1998. Cultivars studies for winter Cauliflower. Mededeling<br />
Provincial Onderzocken Voorlichtings Centrum Voor Land en<br />
Tuinbouw Beitem Roeselare No. 400, pp.4.<br />
Wurr, D.C.E., Kay, R.H., Allen, E.J. and Patel, J.C. 1981. Studies of the<br />
growth o and Development of Winter heading Cauliflower J. Agri<br />
Sci, U.K., 97(2): 409-419.<br />
Recieved on 15-08-2012 Accepted on 21-02-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 101-103, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Screening of Chickpea Genotypes for Resistant against Pod Borer, Helicoverpa<br />
armigera Hubn.<br />
JEEWESH KUMAR, D.C. S<strong>IN</strong>GH, A.P. S<strong>IN</strong>GH AND S.K. VERMA<br />
Department of Entomology, Narendra Deva University of Agriculture Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad,<br />
U.P. 224 229<br />
email: singhjeewesh@gmail.com<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Fifty genotypes of chickpea were screened against gram pod<br />
borer under field condition. Each genotype was sown in two<br />
rows of 2 m length in Augmented Design, Susceptible (H82-2)<br />
and resistant (C 235) genotypes as checks were sown after every<br />
10 genotypes. The populations of larvae of gram pod borer were<br />
recorded on each test genotype at 50% pod filling stage. On the<br />
basis of pod damage throughpod borer were grouped in three<br />
categories (Tolerant, Moderate resistant, Susceptible). Nine<br />
genotypes registered as rating scale 1 were graded as tolerant<br />
because their pod damage (5.50-8.50 per cent) were moderate<br />
between resistant and susceptibleand these were DGP 15, GIG<br />
0312, ICCL 87315, ICCV 7, RIL 115, ICC 29, ICC 12470, ICCV<br />
10 and PG 23. Seven genotypes (DGP 15, GIG 0312, ICCL 87315,<br />
ICCV 7, RIL 115, ICC 29, ICC 12470, ICCV 10 and PG 23) had<br />
showed pod damage varies from 20.00-23.00 per cent and rating<br />
scale 3 were placed under susceptible grade because they were<br />
at par with check susceptible (H82-2), remaining 34 genotypes<br />
had showed pod damage varies from 10.50-1900 per cent rating<br />
stage scored 2, were placed under moderately resistant grade.<br />
Key words<br />
Chickpea, H. armigera, Screening<br />
India is the largest producer of chickpea with 67 % of<br />
the global production It occupies nearly 31 % of total pulse<br />
area in the country and contributes over 37 % to the national<br />
pulse production. One of the most practical means of<br />
increasing chickpea production is to minimize losses caused<br />
by insect-pests. Gram pod borer, H. Armigera is known to be<br />
the key pest due to high reproduction rates, a fast generation<br />
on turn over, wide genetic diversity occurs location and an<br />
ability to withstand, metabolize and avoid toxic chemicals.<br />
The young larvae feed on the tender portion of the leaves on<br />
shoots by making scratches. Second and subsequent grown<br />
up larvae consume whole leaf, leaf buds, flower buds and<br />
flower. Under severe pest infestation, whole crop may get<br />
defoliated. With the availability of pods, the 3 rd instar larvae<br />
make a hole in the pods and move inside to feed on the grains,<br />
where as fully grown larvae feed after making a hole in the<br />
pods and thrusting its head, there in while keeping hind parts<br />
of the body outside. The yield loss in chickpea due to H.<br />
armigera was reported as 10-60% in the normal weather<br />
condition (Vaishmpayan and Veda, 1980). The single larva of<br />
H. armigera may destroy 30-40 pods in its lifetime (Atwal and<br />
Dhaliwal, 2005). Keeping the aforesaid fact in view, the present<br />
study was undertaken to develop effective, economic and<br />
feasible management of this pest.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
The experimental site lies between 26.47 0 N latitude,<br />
82.12 0 E longitude and 113 m above from the sea level in the<br />
sub-tropical belt of the country and soil is alkaline to normal.<br />
The present investigation was carried out at Students<br />
Instructional Farm of Narendra Deva University of Agriculture<br />
Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad during Rabi, 2007-08. Fifty<br />
genotypes of chickpea were screened against gram pod borer<br />
under field condition. Each genotype was sown in two rows<br />
of 2 m length in Augmented Design, Susceptible (H82-2) and<br />
resistant (C 235) varieties as checks were sown after every 10<br />
genotypes. The populations of larvae of gram pod borer were<br />
recorded on each test genotype at 50 per cent pod filling<br />
stage. The pod damage was recorded at pod maturity stage<br />
using 1 to 9 damage rating scale. (1 = > 10 % pod damage, 2 =<br />
11-20 % pod damage, 3 = 21-30% pod damage, 4 = 31-40% pod<br />
damage, 5 = 41-50% pod damage, 6 = 51-60% pod damage, 7 =<br />
61-70% pod damage, 8 = 71-80% pod damage, 9 = > 80% pod<br />
damage).<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The population of H. armigera and pod were damage<br />
observed on fifty genotypes sown in 4 th week of October,<br />
2007 in 2 rows of 2 m length in augmented design. Susceptible<br />
(H82-2) and resistant (C 235) genotypes as check were sown<br />
after every 10 genotypes. The larval population could be not<br />
recorded at 50% flowering stage of crop in any genotypes<br />
due to non presence of larvae then larval population of pod<br />
borer was recorded at 50% at flowering stage.<br />
The maximum number of larvae 3.0/ 10 plants was at<br />
50% pod filling stage and highest per cent pod damage 23%<br />
was recorded in susceptible genotype H82-2 at pod maturity<br />
stage. The lowest larval population 0.5/ 10 plants was noted<br />
at 50% pod filling stage and lowest pod damage 5.5% was<br />
recorded at pod maturity stage in resistance genotype C 235.<br />
The seven varieties NDG 5-32, ICCC 37, RIL 27, DCP 8, BDNG<br />
9-3, Udai and ICC 12479 were at par with check H 82-2 on the<br />
basis of larval population varies from 2-3 per 10 plants and per<br />
cent pod damage varies from 20-23%. The nine genotypes<br />
DGP 15, GIG 0312, ICCL 87315, ICCV 7, RIL 115, ICC 29, ICC
102 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
12470, ICCV 10 and PG 23 were at par with check C 232 based<br />
on larval population (0-1 larva/10 plants) and 5.50-8.50% pod<br />
damage. Rest 34 genotypes were found moderate level of larval<br />
population (1-2 larvae/10plants) and pod damage (10.50-<br />
19.00%). Gumber, et al., 2000 recorded one number of pod per<br />
plant, number of pods damaged by pod borer, pod length,<br />
pod width and seed yield per plant showed that accessions<br />
ICC 93512, ICC 93515 and ICC 93212 were the most promising<br />
with higher seed yield and low pod borer damage. Similarly<br />
Afzal, et al., 2001 screened eight test lines of chickpea against<br />
H. armigera and observed that two genotypes (Pb 2000 and<br />
96051) were highly resistant, three advanced lines (9075, 96052<br />
and BC 6-5) were resistant, two advanced lines (90395-K and<br />
97047) were moderately resistant and only advanced line<br />
(88194) was susceptible. Mandal, 2003 evaluated 18 chickpea<br />
genotypes against H. armigera in field condition. Pod damage<br />
varied from 9.43 to 24.80%. Two genotypes (PS 83149 and<br />
Bhawanipatna) were resistant, 6 were moderately resistant, 7<br />
were moderately susceptible and 3 were insusceptible to the<br />
pest. Gowda, et al., 2005 recorded that genotype BGD 237 had<br />
significantly lowest per cent pod damage of 11.86 and 10.84<br />
during 2000-01 and 2001-02, respectively. BGD 237 recorded a<br />
pest susceptibility rating of 5, indicating resistant in both<br />
years.<br />
On the basis of pod damage through pod borer were<br />
grouped in three categories (Tolerant, Moderate resistant,<br />
Susceptible). Nine genotypes registered as rating scale 1 were<br />
graded as tolerant because their pod damage (5.50-8.50 per<br />
cent) were moderate between resistant and susceptibleand<br />
these were had showed pod damage varies from 20.00-23.00%<br />
andrating scale 3 were placed under susceptible grade because<br />
they were at par with check susceptible (H82-2) (Table 2),<br />
remaining 34 genotypes had showed pod damage varies from<br />
10.50-1900 per cent rating stage scored 2, were placed under<br />
moderately resistant grade and Singh and Yadav, 1999 also<br />
found the genotype ICC 29 as tolerant to pod borer. Rai and<br />
Ramujagir, 2005 found four genotypes (ICCV 93929, ICCV<br />
96029, ICCV 96030 and ICCV 2) as resistant to pod borer with<br />
a pest damage of 3 scale on 1-9. On the other hand, ICCV 10,<br />
ICCV 97115, ICCV 97119 and ICCV 16381 proved tolerant.<br />
Bhagwat and Sharma, 2000 tested twenty one chickpea<br />
genotypes for resistance to H. armigera in glasshouse in<br />
field condition. Genotypes ICC506, ICCV, ICCL86102 and<br />
ICCV95992 had a low pod damage rating of 3 (1 to 9 scale).<br />
ICC86102, a short duration genotype and ICCL86106, a medium<br />
Table 1.<br />
Screening of chickpea genotypes for resistance to gram pod borer, H. armigera<br />
S. No. Genotypes<br />
larvae/ 10 plants at Pod damage<br />
larvae/ 10 plants at pod damage<br />
S. No. Genotypes<br />
filling stage<br />
(%)<br />
filling stage<br />
(%)<br />
# H82-2 2.0 19.0 26 RIL 85 1.5 14.0<br />
* C 235 0.5 6.0 27 ICC 4934 1.0 16.0<br />
1 DGP 15 1.0 8.5 28 ICC 1433 1.5 12.0<br />
2 ICCV 96752 1.5 13.5 29 BG 2044 2.0 16.0<br />
3 PG 700 1.5 15.5 30 BDNG 9-3 2.5 20.0<br />
4 NDGS 32 2.0 20.5 # H 82-2 0.5 23.0<br />
5 GL 22067 1.5 14.5 * C 235 1.0 7.5<br />
6 PG 114 1.5 14.0 31 RIL 115 1.0 8.0<br />
7 Annigeri 1.0 10.5 32 GL 1362 1.0 12.5<br />
8 ICC 15894 1.5 11.5 33 Vijay 1.5 15.5<br />
9 BGM 555 2.0 15.5 34 ICC 79037 1.5 14.5<br />
10 ICCC 37 2.5 21.5. 35 ICC 506 1.5 15.0<br />
# H82-2 3.0 21.5 36 ICC 29 1.0 7.5<br />
* C 235 1.0 6.5 37 ICC 3935 1.0 12.0<br />
11 GIG 0312 1.0 8.0 38 ICCV 95992 1.5 12.5<br />
12 ICCL 86111 1.5 12.0 39 BG 256 1.0 11.0<br />
13 ICC 3137 1.5 14.0 40 BGP 1033 1.5 11.5<br />
14 Vishwash-12 1.5 13.0 # H 82-2 2.0 19.0<br />
15 RIL 27 2.0 21.5 * C 235 1.0 5.5<br />
16 ICL 2000-6 1.5 14.5 41 H 86-18 1.5 12.5<br />
17 ICCL 87315 1.0 8.0 42 IC 14872 1.5 10.5<br />
18 ICC 8923 1.5 12.5 43 ICCL 87316 1.5 14.0<br />
19 ICC 5780 2.0 14.5 44 ICC 12470 1.0 8.0<br />
20 ICCV 10 1.02.5 7.5 45 RSG 888 1.0 13.0<br />
# H82-2 1.0 21.0 46 DCP 8 2.0 20.5<br />
* C 235 1.0 6.0 47 PG 32 1.5 12.0<br />
21 ICCV 7 1.5 6.5 48 ICCV 4959 1.0 8.0<br />
22 RIL 81 1.0 12.5 49 Udai 2.0 20.5<br />
23 ICC 15869 1.5 10.5 50 ICC 12479 2.0 20.0<br />
24 ICCL 87314 1.5 15.5 # H 82-2 2.0 21.0<br />
25 Radhe 1.5 13.5 * C 235 1.0 7.0<br />
#Check susceptible genotype<br />
*Check resistant genotype
Table 2.<br />
KUMAR et al., Screening of chickpea genotypes for resistant against pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera Hubn. 103<br />
Identification of promising chickpea genotypes against H. armigera<br />
Grade Damage rating stage Number of genotypes Genotypes identified<br />
Tolerant 1 9 DGP 15, GIG 0312, ICCL 87315, ICCV 7, RIL 115, ICC 29, ICC 12470,<br />
ICCV 10 and PG 23<br />
Moderate resistant 2 34 ICCV 96752, PG 700, GL 22067, PG 114, Annigeri, ICC 15894, BGM 555,<br />
ICCL 86111, ICC 3137, Vishwash 12, ICL 2000 6, ICC 8923, ICC 5780,<br />
RIL 81, ICC 15869, ICCL 87314, Radhe, RIL 85, ICC 4934, ICC 1433, BG<br />
2044, GL 1362, Vijay, ICC 79037, ICC 506, ICC 3935, ICCV 95992, BG<br />
256, BGP 1033, H 86-18, IC 14872, ICCL 87316, RSG 888, PG 32<br />
Susceptible 3 7 NDGS 32, ICCC 37, RIL 27, DCP 8, BDNG9-3, Udai and ICC12479<br />
duration genotype were identified as a promising source of<br />
resistance to H. armigera. The lowest yield (772 kg/ ha) was<br />
produced by the genotype Chaffa due to its smaller grain size<br />
and lowest yield potential. Sanap and Jamadagni, 2005<br />
screened 25 genotypes and observed that resistant genotypes<br />
ICC506EB, ICC13, ICCX730014, ICC9854, ICC5800 and<br />
ICC12493, with a rating of 7 and ICC926, ICC19492 and<br />
ICCL87220 with a rating 8, were susceptible to H. armigera.<br />
Rai and Ramujagir, 2005 screened chickpea genotypes and<br />
reported that two genotype Avrodh and L550 as susceptible,<br />
four genotypes (ICCB93929, ICCB96029, ICCE96030 and ICCB2<br />
as resistant to gram pod borer with a pest damage score of 3<br />
on a scale of 1-9. On the other hand, ICCV10, ICCV97115,<br />
ICCV97119 and ICC16381 proved tolerant against H. armigera.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Afzal, M., Ghafoor, H.A., Javed, A. and Sabri, M.A. 2001. Role of<br />
physico-morphic characters in different varieties and advanced<br />
lines of chickpea towards resistance against Helicoverpa armigera<br />
(Hub.). Pakistan Entomologist, 23(1/2): 71-74.<br />
Atwal, A.S. and Dhaliwal, G.S. 2005. Agricultural Pests of South Asia<br />
and their Management, Kalyani Publisher, New Delhi.<br />
Bhagwat, V.R. and Sharma, S.B. 2000. Evaluation of chickpea genotypes<br />
for resistance to legumes pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera and<br />
root-knot nematode, Meloidogynejavanica. Indian J. Plant Prot.,<br />
28(1): 69-73.<br />
Gowda, D.K.S., Sharanabasappa and Halle, D. 2005. Screening of<br />
resistant chickpea genotypes for Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.)<br />
Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 18(4): 1107-1108.<br />
Gumber, R.K., Singh, Sarvjeet, Kular, J.S., Singh, Kuldip, Singh, S. and<br />
Singh, K. 2000. Screening of chickpea genotypes for resistance to<br />
Helicoverpa armigera. Intl. Chickpea, Pigeonpea, Newsl., 7: 20-<br />
21.<br />
Mandal, S.M.A. 2003. Screening of some chickpea genotypes against<br />
Helicoverpa armigera. Environment and Ecology, 21(1): 240-241.<br />
Rai, D. and Ramujagir 2005. Screening of chickpea genotypes for<br />
resistance to pod borer Helicoverpa armigera. Indian J. Agric.<br />
Sci., 7(2): 120-122.<br />
Sanap, M.M. and Jamadagni, B.M. 2005. Screening of chickpea for<br />
resistance to pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) at Rahuri,<br />
Maharashtra, India. Intl. Chickpea and Pigeonpea Newsl., (12):<br />
37-39.<br />
Singh, B. and Yadav, R.P. 1999. Field screening of chickpea (Cicer<br />
arietinum L.) genotypes against gram pod borer (Helicoverpa<br />
armigera Hub.) under late sown conditions. J. Ent. Res., 23(2):<br />
133-140.<br />
Vaishampayan, S.M. and Veda, O.P. 1980. Population dynamics of<br />
gram pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) in chickpea at Pantnagar<br />
(U.P.), Indian J. Pl. Prot., 15: 39-41.<br />
Recieved on 22-09-2012 Accepted on 03-12-2012
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 104-105, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Knowledge Level of Farmers About Recommended Cultivation Practices of<br />
Groundnut in Panchayat Samiti Govindgarh of District Jaipur (Rajasthan)<br />
H.N. VERMA AND J.P. YADAV<br />
Department of Extension Education, S.K.N. College of Agriculture, Jobner, Jaipur 303 329,<br />
S.K. Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner 334 006<br />
email: kataria.exted@gmail.com<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Despite of the facts, the groundnut contributes about two-fifth<br />
of the total area and production of oilseeds in country. India is<br />
facing acute shortage of vegetable oils. This is mainly due to<br />
the low productivity of these crops. This may be attributed to a<br />
number of factors and constraints, which hinders the adoption<br />
of the innovations. These factors and constraints should be<br />
identified and remove by developing an effective strategy for<br />
farmers.<br />
Key word<br />
Constraints, Adoption, Groundnut Cultivation,<br />
innovation<br />
Indian Economy depends upon Indian agriculture.<br />
About 72.20% population lives in rural areas. The main<br />
occupation of rural people is agriculture. About 30% of the<br />
national income originates from the agriculture sector. About<br />
75% of its population and 66.67% of labour force directly or<br />
indirectly is dependent on agriculture for livelihood. Large<br />
number of important industries like jute, textiles, edible oils,<br />
tobacco, sugar etc. receive the raw materials produced by<br />
agriculture sector. All type of crops representing cereals,<br />
pulses, oilseeds, fibers, species and condiments and many<br />
others are gown in our country.<br />
Groundnut oil is used in manufacturing of soap, hair oil,<br />
vanaspathi, lubricants, textile, auxiliaries etc. The oil find<br />
extensive use as a cooking medium both in its refined form<br />
and as vanaspati ghee. The oil cakes obtained after the<br />
extraction of oil from the groundnut are valuable organic<br />
manure and used as animal feed.<br />
Groundnut is used for edible and non-edible purposes.<br />
About 81.6% of the total production is crushed and used for<br />
edible purpose. The remaining production goes for seed<br />
(12%), feed (5.3%) and exports (1.1%). (Anonymous, 2006-07)<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
The study was conducted in Govindgarh Panchayat<br />
Samiti of Jaipur district. Eight villages namely Ghinoi, Bailabas,<br />
Jheera, Samod, Nindola, Khejroli, Hathnoda and Nangal<br />
Bharda from four selected Gram Panchayat were selected<br />
with the help of simple random sampling technique. From each<br />
selected village, a list of all groundnut growers was prepared<br />
and 20% groundnut growers were selected from each selected<br />
village by using proportionate random sampling technique.<br />
In total, a sample of 124 farmers were drawn for the study<br />
purpose. The adoption level of farmers of recommended<br />
cultivation practices of groundnut is directly or indirectly<br />
related to knowledge level of farmers about different<br />
recommended cultivation practices of groundnut. Hence, it<br />
was considered necessary to assess the knowledge level of<br />
farmers about groundnut cultivation. The knowledge about<br />
the technology had influence on the decision making about<br />
its adoption keeping this view in mind the study “Knowledge<br />
level of farmers about recommended cultivation practices of<br />
groundnut in Panchayat Samiti Govindgarh of district Jaipur<br />
(Rajasthan)” was undertaken with the specific objectives : To<br />
measure the knowledge level of farmers about recommended<br />
cultivation practices of groundnut.<br />
In all, questions were included in the schedule to test<br />
the knowledge of the respondents. Equal weightage was given<br />
to each item, assuming that all the items included were equal<br />
in difficulty to understand, apply and recall. One mark was<br />
given to every right answer and zero for wrong answer. The<br />
following formula was used to work out the knowledge index.<br />
Knowledge index = X 1<br />
+ X 2<br />
+ X 3<br />
+ ——————— X n<br />
Where X 1<br />
, X 2<br />
, X 3<br />
, …………….X n<br />
are correct answer for<br />
first, second, third ………….. X n<br />
questions and n is the<br />
maximum score possible to secure or the number of question<br />
i.e. 12 and the minimum was zero.<br />
The mean and standard deviation of scores secured by<br />
all the respondents were computed for classifying the<br />
knowledge level in different categories. Based on the<br />
knowledge scores, three levels of knowledge of farmers were<br />
categorized as under<br />
(a) Low knowledge level : obtained score below (Mean –<br />
Standard deviation)<br />
(b) Medium knowledge level : obtained score from (Mean –<br />
Standard deviation) to (Mean + Standard deviation)<br />
(c) High knowledge level: Obtained score above (Mean +<br />
Standard deviation).<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Interview schedule consisting of face data of the<br />
respondents measuring device of knowledge level was<br />
prepared for the investigation in light of the suggestions of<br />
the experts. The researcher himself personally interviewed<br />
the respondent and the statistical data regarding the<br />
knowledge of respondents about recommended cultivation<br />
practices of groundnut have been given in Table 1.
VERMA AND YADAV, Knowledge Level of Farmers about Recommended Cultivation Practices of Groundnut 105<br />
Table 1.<br />
Knowledge level of farmers about recommended<br />
cultivation practices of groundnut N = 124<br />
S.No. Knowledge categories Frequency Per cent of<br />
farmers<br />
1 Low knowledge (score below 27.49) 22 17.74<br />
2 Medium knowledge (score from 74 59.68<br />
27.49 to 35.55)<br />
3 High knowledge (score above 33.55) 28 22.58<br />
X = 30.52, = 3.02, 2 = 39.16, Expected frequency = 41.33<br />
The data in Table 1 state that on the whole, 59.68% (74)<br />
groundnut growers were having medium knowledge level<br />
about groundnut cultivation practices and 22.58% (28)<br />
respondents were having high knowledge level, whereas<br />
17.74% (22) farmers were having low knowledge level about<br />
recommended cultivation practices of groundnut. Hence the<br />
null hypothesis (H 01.1<br />
) ‘There is no difference in the level of<br />
knowledge of the farmers about recommended cultivation<br />
practices of groundnut’ was rejected. It means there was a<br />
difference in the knowledge level of the farmers growing<br />
groundnut.<br />
Further, more the percentage of farmers having<br />
knowledge about different aspects of recommended<br />
cultivation practices of groundnut were analysed separately.<br />
The relative importance of the 10 aspects of recommended<br />
cultivation practices of groundnut was highlighted by ranking<br />
them on the basis of the mean per cent scores of farmers<br />
having knowledge about these recommended cultivation<br />
practices of groundnut (Table 2).<br />
The data in Table 2 indicate that 80.50% farmers had<br />
highest knowledge about ‘Sowing time’ and hence, it was<br />
ranked first. The second highest per cent of farmers (75.50)<br />
had knowledge about ‘Recommended seed rate’ followed by<br />
75.00% farmers who had knowledge about ‘Irrigation<br />
management’ were ranked third whereas, 70% farmers had<br />
knowledge about ‘Spacing’ were ranked fourth, while 68.01%<br />
farmers were having knowledge about ‘Seed treatment’ were<br />
ranked fifth. Furthermore, sixth, seventh, eight and ninth ranks<br />
were awarded to weed management (65.10 MPS), plant<br />
protection measures (50.22 MPS), depth of sowing (50.03 MPS)<br />
and use of high yielding variety (50.02 MPS), respectively.<br />
The lowest knowledge of farmers was found about fertilizer<br />
application with 40.21 MPS, hence it was awarded lowest rank<br />
i.e. tenth.<br />
It leads to the conclusion that farmers in general had<br />
medium knowledge about the recommended cultivation<br />
practices of groundnut. This low knowledge may be attributed<br />
due to low literacy, low exposure to mass media, unavailability<br />
of extension literature and less contact with extension<br />
personnels.<br />
From the findings, it is also evident that majority of the<br />
farmers were having higher knowledge about the ‘Sowing<br />
time’, ‘Seed rate’, ‘Irrigation management’, and ‘Spacing’. This<br />
might be due to the reason that majority of the farmers were<br />
regularly growing groundnut for market purpose and these<br />
Table 2.<br />
Practicewise knowledge level of farmers about<br />
recommended cultivation practices of groundnut<br />
N = 124<br />
S.No. Recommended practices Knowledge in mean per cent Rank<br />
1. Use of high yielding variety 50.02 IX<br />
2. Seed rate 75.50 II<br />
3. Seed treatment 68.01 V<br />
4. Spacing 70.04 IV<br />
5. Sowing time 80.50 I<br />
6. Depth of sowing 50.03 VIII<br />
7. Fertilizer application 40.21 X<br />
8. Irrigation management 75.00 III<br />
9. Weed management 65.10 VI<br />
10. Plant protection measures 50.22 VII<br />
Overall 62.46<br />
practices are most critical from the point of view of the<br />
groundnut production. A slight carelessness in these practices<br />
may reduce the production of groundnut drastically, so the<br />
farmers remain most careful about these practices. Also for<br />
producing good quality groundnut, they mostly remain in<br />
contact with the extension agencies, sale agents etc. resulting<br />
gain in knowledge about these recommended cultivation<br />
practices. Most of the farmers under study were literate hence<br />
they might have knowledge about these practices by reading<br />
the related literature. The farmers had medium knowledge<br />
about ‘Seed treatment’, ‘Weed management’, ‘Plant protection<br />
measures’, ‘Depth of sowing’, ‘Use of high yielding varieties’<br />
and ‘Fertilizer application’. This might be due to the reason<br />
that the farmers might not understand the intructions written<br />
on the pack of chemical because of its complex language, as<br />
the instructions are mostly written in typical Hindi or English<br />
language or in the language of the state, where the insecticides,<br />
fungicides, weedicides etc. are manufactured.<br />
Majority of the groundnut growers had medium<br />
knowledge level about the recommended cultivation practices<br />
of groundnut. Among the various aspects of different<br />
cultivation practices, majority of the farmers had knowledge<br />
about ‘Sowing time’, ‘Seed rate’ ‘Irrigation management’,<br />
‘Spacing’, ‘Seed treatment’, ‘Weed management’ and ‘Plant<br />
protection measures’.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Agarwal, J.K. 2000. Knowledge and adoption of improved pea<br />
cultivation practices in Jaipur district of Rajasthan. M.Sc. (Ag.)<br />
Thesis, R.A.U., Campus-Jobner.<br />
Anonymous. 2006-07. Economic Survey. Ministry of Agriculture, Govt.<br />
of India.<br />
Kumar, M. 2004. Adoption of improved cultivation practices of cabbage<br />
in Jaipur district of Rajasthan. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, R.A.U, Campus-<br />
Jobner.<br />
Subhash, C. 2001. Factors affecting adoption of recommended production<br />
technology of groundnut in panchayat samiti Sambhar lake of district<br />
Jaipur (Rajasthan). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, R.A.U., Campus-Jobner.<br />
Yadav, B.C. 2006. A study on knowledge and adoption of improved<br />
production technology of mandarin by the farmers in Jharapatan<br />
panchayat samiti of Jhalawar district of Rajasthan. M.Sc. (Ag.)<br />
Thesis, R.A.U., Campus Jobner.<br />
Recieved on 28-12-2012 Accepted on 18-02-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 106-107, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Stability Studies on Sewage Irrigation Effect on Grain Yield and Protein-content in<br />
Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek<br />
DYUTI PANDEY, P.S. SHUKLA AND D.N. SHUKLA<br />
Department of Botany, University of Allahabad, Allahabad 211 002<br />
email: dyutipandey@gmail.com<br />
ABSTTRACT<br />
Ten genotypes of mung bean viz., Samrat (PDM 139), Kopergaon,<br />
MUM 1, RMG 62, Phule M-2, Pusa 9531, Vamban 1, PDM 11,<br />
PDM 96-262, PDM 99-284, were evaluated in four environments<br />
i.e. plain water(E 1<br />
) ,<br />
sewage water(E 2<br />
), plain water+15 kg N/ha(E 3<br />
)<br />
and sewage water +15 kg N/ha(E 4<br />
) . The stability parameters,<br />
mean value (x), regression coefficient (b i<br />
) and deviation from<br />
regression (S 2 ) were studied for yield per plant and protein<br />
di<br />
content in various environments. In the study significant<br />
difference s we re o bserved for geno type s in differe nt<br />
environments. Treatment E 1<br />
gave the highest yield and E 3<br />
gave<br />
the highest protein- content. Variety PDM 11 showed high mean<br />
values for yield per plant in treatment E1, followed by PDM 96-<br />
262 and for protein- content. PDM 11 and Phule M-2 both were<br />
found highly significant, they were considered to be stable<br />
genotypes in different environment.<br />
Key words<br />
Genotypes, environment, mung bean, sewage water,<br />
protein content<br />
Mungbean (green gram), which is grown throughout<br />
the year in one or the other part of the country, has array of<br />
variability for maturity duration and plant type. In North India,<br />
it is grown in rainy as well as in summer season. Sewage water<br />
irrigation provides organic matter with macro- and micronutrients<br />
which are essential for the growth and development<br />
of mung bean. Commercial agricultural procedures, poor<br />
genetic variability and lack of authentic genetic information<br />
are the main constraints in the way to select suitable varieties<br />
which can be grown successfully if only sewage water<br />
irrigation facility is available their. Under these circumstances,<br />
it becomes imperative to find out genotypes with their stability<br />
possessing wider adaptability when irrigated with sewage<br />
water. Genetic, Environmental and Genetic x Environmental (G<br />
x E) interactions are of considerable importance in the selection<br />
of desirable genotypes. In the present study stability<br />
parameters for yield per plant and protein content were studied<br />
for ten varieties of mung bean in four environments (irrigations)<br />
to find out the effect for the same.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
The experimental material consisted of 10 promising<br />
genotypes of mungbean–Samrat (PDM 139), Kopergaon,<br />
MUM 1, RMG 62, Phule M 2, Pusa 9531, Vamban 1, PDM 11,<br />
PDM 96-262, PDM 99-284, which were grown in four<br />
environments viz., plain water (E 1<br />
), sewage water (E 2<br />
), plain<br />
water +15 kg N/ha (E 3<br />
) and sewage water +15 kg N/ha (E 4<br />
)<br />
under randomized block design (RBD) with three replications,<br />
keeping single row of genotypes with inter- and intra-row<br />
distances of 45 cm and 15 cm, respectively .The entire<br />
experiment was carried out in two parts. In the first part, twenty<br />
genotypes were grown in sewage water and plain water,<br />
simultaneously. Out of twenty varieties, ten varieties, which<br />
were found significant regarding tolerance to sewage water<br />
and were comparatively better in yield as well as in other yield<br />
attributes, were selected for the second experiment consisting<br />
of stability study. The weight of seeds of five randomly<br />
selected plants of each genotype was recorded and the final<br />
grain yield per plant was worked out. The protein content was<br />
estimated in per cent by chemical analysis of grains. Stability<br />
analysis was carried out.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
It is evident from the ANOVA (Table 2) that there were<br />
significant differences among genotypes, environments and<br />
genotypes x environment (GxE) interaction. The significant G<br />
x E interaction revealed that genotypes responded differently<br />
to the changes in the environment. Different environments<br />
were provided at one location (Luthra, et al., 1974). The<br />
average performance of genotypes with respect to both the<br />
traits varied significantly. The environmental interactions, both<br />
linear and non-linear, were significant for both the characters.<br />
A genotype may be considered to be stable over different<br />
environments if it shows unit or less than unit regression<br />
coefficient (b i<br />
) with the lowest deviation (non-significant) from<br />
the linear regression (S 2 d i<br />
) (Rai, et al., 1989). With this view,<br />
high and desirable mean performance of a variety over<br />
environments is also supposed to be a positive consideration<br />
to rank the variety as a better and stable genotype.<br />
The genotypes PDM 11 was found having highest mean<br />
value for grain yield per plant and protein-content. For yield<br />
per plant, unit or less than unit regression coefficient and<br />
non-significant deviation from the linear regression (S 2 di) was<br />
observed for Kopergaon, MUM 1 and PDM 99-284 (Table 2).<br />
Regarding protein-content, genotypes Samrat, Kopergaon,<br />
MUM 1, RMG 62 and PDM 11 were found having regression<br />
coefficient (bi) less than one with non-significant deviation<br />
from linear regression (S 2 di). Therefore, on the basis of these<br />
results, genotypes Kopergaon and MUM 1 can be<br />
recommended as stable for wide range of environments i.e.<br />
non-sewage and sewage irrigation.
Table 1.<br />
PANDEY et al., Stability Studies on Sewage Irrigation Effect on Grain Yield and Protein-content in Mungbean 107<br />
Estimates of Mean, Range, Standard Error and Coefficient of Variation in respect to grain yield per plant and<br />
proteincontent for 10 genotypes of Mungbean over four environments.<br />
S. Genotypes<br />
Grain yield/plant<br />
Protein content<br />
No.<br />
E 1 E 2 E 3 E 4 Pooled E 1 E 2 E 3 E 4 Pooled<br />
1 Samrat (PDM139) 4.5 4.84 5.24 5.43 5.01 22.89 23.19 23.74 23.73 23.39<br />
2 Kopergaon 5.58 5.41 5.36 5.59 5.48 23.78 23.86 24.41 24.61 24.16<br />
3 MUM 1 6.8 6.81 6.84 6.91 6.84 24.81 25.11 25.4 25.16 25.12<br />
4 RMG 62 4.98 5.38 5.38 5.53 5.32 22.47 23.1 23.43 23.43 23.11<br />
5 Phule M 2 6.54 5.07 4.98 5.19 5.44 24.77 25.54 25.88 25.86 25.51<br />
6 Pusa 9531 4.55 5.21 5.68 5.59 5.26 23.12 23.4 24.16 24.23 23.73<br />
7 Vamban 1 4.51 4.69 4.7 4.78 4.67 25.18 25.97 26.78 26.45 26.09<br />
8 PDM 11 10.42 8.36 7.49 8.33 8.65 26.08 26.22 26.51 26.5 26.33<br />
9 PDM 96-262 8.91 8.2 7.53 8.12 8.19 24.69 25.26 26.2 24.82 24.48<br />
10 PDM 99-284 7.05 7.03 6.88 7.26 7.04 23.83 25.27 24.99 24.82 24.48<br />
Range among genotypes 4.50-10.42 4.69- 8.36 4.70- 7.53 4.78-8.33 4.67-8.65 22.47-26.08 23.10 -26.22 23.73 - 26.78 23.43-26.50 23.10 -26.33<br />
G. Mean 6.38 6.09 6.01 6.26 6.18 24.16 24.59 25.14 25.08 24.75<br />
S.E. Diff. of Mean± 0.66 0.55 0.18 0.2 0.18 0.12 0.17 0.67 0.23 0.79<br />
Coefficient of Variation 1.48 1.28 4.36 4.33 8.23 0.68 0.97 0.38 1.32 0.9<br />
Table 2. ANOVA for stability parameters for different<br />
characters of mungbean genotypes.<br />
Source of variation d. f. Protein content Grain yield per plant<br />
Genotypes (G) 9 5.18** 7.82**<br />
Environments (E) 3 2.13** 0.28*<br />
G X E 27 0.038** 0.29**<br />
Environments + ( G X E) 30 0.25** 0.30**<br />
Environments (Linear) 1 6.4** 0.85**<br />
G X E (Linear) 9 0.081** 0.58**<br />
Pooled deviations 20 0.014 0.14**<br />
Pooled error 108 0.05 0.25<br />
*Significant at p=0.05; **Significant at p=0.01<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Luthra, O.P., Singh, R.K. and Kakar, S.N. 1974. Comparison of different<br />
stability models in wheat. Theoretical Applied Genetics, 45: 143-<br />
49.<br />
Rai, M., Kerkhi, S.A., Pandey, S., Naqvi, P.A. and Vashistha 1989.<br />
Stability analysis for some quality components of seed and oil in<br />
linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) Indian Journal of Genetics. 49(3):<br />
291-295.<br />
Recieved on 01-02-<strong>2013</strong> Accepted on 15-02-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 108-111, <strong>2013</strong><br />
In Vitro Screening and Identification of Putative Sunflower (Helianthus annus L.)<br />
Transformants Expressing ECNAC1 Gene by Salt Stress Method<br />
K.C. MANJUNATH 1&2 , A. MAHADEVA 2 , ROH<strong>IN</strong>I SREEVATHSA 2 , N. RAMACHANDRA SWAMY 1 AND<br />
T.G. PRASAD 2<br />
1<br />
Department of Biochemistry, Bangalore University, Central College, Bangalore 560 001, Karnataka, India<br />
2<br />
Department of Crop Physiology, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore 560 065, Karnataka, India<br />
email: kcmanjunath81@gmail.com 1<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
A simple and effective screening methodology to identify<br />
transformants at plant level under NaCl stress has been<br />
established. Leaf disc of putative transformants (T 1<br />
individual,<br />
6-8 weeks old) and wild type plants were placed on filter paper<br />
in the presence of NaCl (200 mM) for 48 hr at room temperature.<br />
The leaf discs of EcNAC1 gene transformed plants showed salt<br />
tolerance by retaining green colour after 48 hours, while leaf<br />
discs from non-transformed plants turned dark brown or black<br />
in colour. Further, molecular analysis of these salt tolerant<br />
plants showed PCR positive to EcNAC1 gene specific and HPT<br />
II specific primers, and digestion of amplified EcNAC1 gene<br />
product with Sac I restriction enzyme showed expected bands<br />
size on agarose gel. Our data suggest that in vitro screening<br />
strategy at plant level based on the target gene incorporated<br />
would result in the initial identification of promis ing<br />
transformants for further analysis.<br />
Key words<br />
Abiotic stress, EcNAC1, Transcription Factor,<br />
Methodology, Transgenics<br />
The salt stress and dehydration stress show a high<br />
degree of similarity with respect to physiological, biochemical,<br />
molecular and genetical effects (Cushman, et al., 1990).<br />
Introducing a single regulatory gene improved both drought<br />
and salt tolerance in plants reported by many researchers<br />
(Yong Xiang, et al., 2008 and Xingnan Zheng, et al., 2009).<br />
Transcription factors have proven quite useful in improving<br />
stress tolerance in transgenic plants, through influencing<br />
expression of a number of stress-related target genes. Among<br />
this, the NAC transcription factor proteins constitute one of<br />
the largest families of plant-specific transcription factors<br />
involved in response to various environmental stresses.<br />
Collectively, many reports indicate that overexpression of NAC<br />
transcription factor conferred abiotic stress tolerance in plants<br />
(Honghong, et al., 2006 and Venkategowda Ramegowda, et<br />
al., 2012).<br />
The GUS assay (beta glucuronidase assay) is an easy<br />
method to determine the transient expression of the reporter<br />
gene (Jefferson, et al., 1987). This assay is based on<br />
fluorescence emitted by the product of GUS substrate X-gluc,<br />
which makes it very expensive. The selectable marker gene<br />
activity such as spraying on the whole plants or leaf with<br />
herbicide (Datta, et al., 1992), germination of seeds on selective<br />
media (Hiei, et al., 1994) are being used to screen putative<br />
transformants. Screening the putative transformants based<br />
on the function of target gene incorporated will give the<br />
confirmation of the gene incorporated along with the abiotic<br />
stress tolerance. In this paper, we report a simple and efficient<br />
in vitro screening strategy for the selection of putative<br />
transformants based on the performance of target gene by<br />
salt stress method.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Plant material<br />
The sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) inbreds seeds<br />
(IB20) were procured from Sunflower Scheme, UAS, GKVK,<br />
Bangalore, India. The Agrobacterium culture harboring<br />
EcNAC1 (pG-CaMV 35S-EcNAC1 with hpt II) gene was<br />
procured from Dept of Crop Physiology, UAS, GKVK,<br />
Bangalore, India. The Agrobacterium culture was used for<br />
plant transformation in sunflower inbred line by following in<br />
planta transformation protocol (Sankara Rao and Rohini, 1999).<br />
The seedlings with just emerging plumule were infected by<br />
pricking at the meristems with a sterile needle and immersed in<br />
a suspension of Agrobacterium for 1 hr. Then, the seedlings<br />
were washed with sterile water and transferred onto autoclaved<br />
soilrite (vermiculite equivalent) moistened with water for<br />
germination under aseptic conditions in glass jars of 200 ml<br />
capacity with 3 seedlings per jar. After 5 to 6 days, the seedlings<br />
were transferred to pots and allowed to grow in green house<br />
condition. The T 1<br />
seeds of the above transformants were used<br />
for the development of screening strategies.<br />
Standardization of stress inducers concentration<br />
Leaf discs from fully expanded leaves of 6-8 weeks old<br />
wild type sunflower (IB20) plants were subjected to 50, 100,<br />
150, 200 and 250 mM NaCl concentration, incubated for 48 hr<br />
at room temperature. The induction of chlorosis in the leaf<br />
discs were recorded after 48 hr incubation. The final screening<br />
concentration was fixed based on the concentration at which<br />
the green colour leaf discs turns to complete dark brown or<br />
black.<br />
Screening putative transformants at plant level by stress<br />
induced leaf damage<br />
Leaf discs from fully expanded leaves of 6-8 weeks old<br />
putative transformants and wild type were placed on filter
MANJUNATH et al., In Vitro Screening and Identification of Putative Sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) 109<br />
paper dampened with 200 mM NaCl. They were incubated for<br />
48 hr at room temperature and the symptom of bleaching or<br />
browning was documented. The salt tolerant plants were<br />
selected for further molecular analysis.<br />
Molecular Analysis<br />
PCR Analysis<br />
DNA isolated from the leaves of salt tolerant and wild<br />
type plants used as templet DNA for polymerase chain<br />
reaction along with the primers EcNAC1 FP 5’-<br />
CAGGATCCATGACCATGGGAGGAGGG-3’ and RP 5’-<br />
CCTAGAATTCTGTATTTACAGAGGTCGC-3’, HPT II FP 5’-<br />
CCTAGAATTCTGTATTTACAGAGGTCGC-3’ and RP 5’-<br />
ATCGCCTCGCTCCAGTCAATG-3’. Amplification was<br />
performed in the total volume of 15 ìl containing 1.5 ìl of 10X<br />
buffer (Fermentas, U.S.A), 1.5 ìl of 2 mM dNTP, 1 ìl of genomic<br />
DNA (100 ng), 5 pmol of each forward and reverse primer, and<br />
1ìl (2.5 U/ìl) unit of Taq polymerase. PCR were carried out with<br />
a Eppendorf thermal cycler by using initial denaturation at<br />
94 o C for 5 min followed by 30 cycles consisting of 94 o C for 30<br />
sec, 55 o C for 30 sec and 72 o C for 90 sec, a final extension step<br />
consisting of 72 o C for 10 min. The resulting amplified product<br />
resolved on 1% agarose gel.<br />
Restriction Digestion Analysis<br />
The Gene specific PCR products were purified by PCR<br />
purification kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the<br />
manufacturer’s instruction and the PCR product was digested<br />
with Sac I restriction enzyme (Fermentas, USA). The restriction<br />
digestion were performed in the total volume of 20 ìl containing<br />
2 ìl of gene specific PCR product, 2 ìl of Sac I buffer B (Blue)<br />
1x, 1 ìl of Sac I restriction enzyme and 15 ìl of nuclease free<br />
water. The digestion was carried out for 1 hour and the resulting<br />
digested products were resolved on 1% agarose gel.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The development of transgenic plants is a potential<br />
option to improve abiotic stress tolerance, the screening for<br />
superior transgenic lines is therefore a crucial step. The use<br />
of an inplanta transformation protocol results in the<br />
development of a large number of T 0<br />
plants and in turn a large<br />
number of T 1<br />
generation plants. Screening of a large number<br />
of plants requires standardization of high throughput<br />
screening procedures based on either the selectable marker<br />
or the target gene incorporated. The leaf tip assay was reported<br />
by Noor, et al., 2000 to screen putative transgenic rice and<br />
cotton based on selectable marker hpt II or npt II. This leaf tip<br />
assay doesn’t give information about the performance of the<br />
target gene incorporated in the plant to combat abiotic stress.<br />
In this study, screening the putative transformants based on<br />
target gene incorporated. This strategy utilized leaves of 6-8<br />
week old plants. The leaf disc bioassay is an example of a<br />
quick method to measure salt induced damage (Singla-Pareek,<br />
et al., 2003 and Sanan-Mishra, et al., 2005). This technique<br />
reveals the ability of the tissue to tolerate Na + accumulation<br />
and eliminates the consequence of altered ion transport from<br />
root to shoot.<br />
Standardization of Salt concentration<br />
Detection of salt concentration to screen putative<br />
transformants was carried out by subjecting the leaf discs of<br />
wild type sunflower plant (IB20) on 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 mM<br />
Fig. 1.<br />
Maximum salt tolerance limits of the wild type sunflower (IB20) plants detected in different salt concentration. (a) 0 mM<br />
(Distil water); (b to f): 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 mM NaCl concentration.<br />
Fig. 2.<br />
Screening putative transformants at plant level by 200 mM NaCl induced leaf damage (a-d). Wt: wild type, 1-15: putative<br />
transformants.
110 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
NaCl, incubated for 48 hr at room temperature. No colour<br />
change was observed in 50 mM NaCl, while gradual colour<br />
change appeared in 100 and 150 mM NaCl concentration, while<br />
the leaves turned complete dark brown or black colour in 200<br />
and 250 mM NaCl concentration (Fig 1). This indicated that<br />
200 mM NaCl concentration was ideal for screening putative<br />
sunflower transformants.<br />
Screening putative transformants at plant level by stress<br />
induced leaf damage<br />
A total of 860 T 1<br />
plants were raised from the 24 T 0<br />
individual plants and the leaf discs of each individual plant<br />
were subjected to salt stress. Leaf discs of putative<br />
transformants along with the wild type plants were placed on<br />
filter paper dampened with 200 mM NaCl and incubated for 48<br />
hr at room temperature and scored subsequently. The leaves<br />
of tolerant plant retained green colour, while susceptible and<br />
wild type treated plant leaves turned dark brown or black<br />
colour after 48 hr incubation (Fig. 2). Out of 860 T 1<br />
plant only<br />
10 plants showed salt tolerance and selected for further<br />
molecular analysis.<br />
PCR Analysis<br />
The gene integration was confirmed in 10 salt tolerant<br />
plants. The selected 10 salt tolerant plants showed PCR<br />
positive for both Gene specific and HPT II primers with the<br />
product size of 1.1 kb and 0.5 kb respectively (Fig. 3a & 3b).<br />
The transgenic nature of the tolerant plants was further<br />
confirmed by the polymerase chain reaction with gene specific<br />
primer for salt susceptible plants that showed absence of 1.1<br />
kb band (Fig. 3c).<br />
Restriction Digestion Analysis<br />
Restriction digestion analysis were carried out in 5 PCR<br />
amplified EcNAC1 gene product with Sac I restriction enzyme.<br />
The digested product showed expected band size of 700 bp<br />
and 400 bp on 1% agarose gel (Fig. 4).<br />
In this assay both wild type and putative transformants<br />
leaf discs placed on single filter paper to reduce the variations<br />
in the treatment and also easy to compare colour change<br />
between wild type and transgenics. The salt tolerance<br />
exhibited by transgenic plants expressing EcNAC1<br />
transcription factor will be due to up-regulation of downstream<br />
salt responsive gene. Ramegowda, et al., 2012 reported that<br />
EcNAC1-confers abiotic stress tolerance in tobacco. The leaf<br />
discs of wild type plant exhibits tolerance to lower salt<br />
concentration (50 mM), this may be due to transporting Na +<br />
ion into the vacuole, but high salt concentration exceed the<br />
limit of vacuolar storage capacity or transport efficiency, which<br />
in turn causes oxidative stress. The accumulation of reactive<br />
oxygen species (ROS) increases within the leaf discs and<br />
damage the chloroplast, which turns green colour to dark<br />
brown or black. Therefore, the plants retained green colour<br />
was considered as putative transformants and selected for<br />
further molecular analysis. Salt tolerant plants showed<br />
amplification of EcNAC1 and HPT II genes, which indicates<br />
stable gene integration. Further confirmation was done by<br />
digesting the EcNAC1 gene products of 5 plants with Sac I<br />
restriction enzyme which resulted in the expected band size<br />
on agarose gel. The leaf disc assay is being used in general to<br />
assess whether the transgene brings about tolerance to the<br />
stress and to assess the relative difference.<br />
Fig. 3.<br />
PCR analysis for Salt tolerant Plants: (a) PCR amplified 1.1 Kb EcNAC1 gene products (b) PCR amplified 0.5 Kb HPT II<br />
gene products. M: 1kb DNA ladder (Fermentas U.S.A); P: Plasmid (Positive control); Salt Susceptible plants (c) PCR reaction<br />
with gene specific primer. [B: blank (PCR cocktail without Taq polymerase); W: Wild type (Negative control); 1-10: Putative<br />
transformants.
MANJUNATH et al., In Vitro Screening and Identification of Putative Sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) 111<br />
Fig. 4.<br />
PCR amplified five EcNAC1 gene products digested<br />
with Sac I restriction enzyme M: 1kb DNA ladder; 1-<br />
5: Putative transformants.<br />
In this study the emphasis was to screen the transformed<br />
segregants to identify putative transformants with stable<br />
integration and expression. Understanding the molecular basis<br />
will be helpful in developing selection strategies for improving<br />
abiotic stress tolerance. The stringent primary screening<br />
strategy as a part would help in identification and better<br />
understanding of the phenotypes associated with abiotic<br />
stress tolerance. In vitro Screening of putative transformants<br />
based on target gene incorporated is an effective methodology<br />
to drastically narrow down the potential tolerant lines.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />
Program supported by: ICAR –NAE: 10-(6)/2005 EP & D<br />
and are gratefully acknowledge DBT-COE: BT/01/COE/05/03<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Cushman, J.C., De Rocher, E.J. and Bohnert, H.J. 1990. Gene expression<br />
during adaptation to salt stress. In: Environmental Injury of Plants<br />
(ed. Kalterman, F.), Academic Press, San Diego, pp.173-203.<br />
Datta, S.K., Datta, K., Soltanifar, N., Donn, G. and Potrykus, I. 1992.<br />
Herbicide-resistant indica rice plants from IRRI breeding line IR72<br />
after PEG-mediated transformation of protopiasts. Plant. Mol.<br />
Biol, 20: 619-629.<br />
Freyssinet, M. and Freyssinet, G. 1998. Fertile plant regeneration from<br />
sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) immature embryos. Plant Sci.,<br />
56: 177-181.<br />
Hiei, Y., Ohta, S., Komari, T. and Kumashiro, T. 1994. Efficient<br />
transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium<br />
and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J, 6:<br />
271-282.<br />
Honghong, Hu, Mingqiu, Dai, Jialing, Yao, Benze Xiao, Xianghua, Li,<br />
Qifa Zhang, Lizhong Xiong. 2006. Overexpressing a NAM, ATAF,<br />
and CUC (NAC) transcription factor enhances drought resistance<br />
and salt tolerance in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 103(35): 12987-<br />
12992.<br />
Jefferson, R.A., Burgess, S.M. and Hirsh, D. 1987. Beta glucuronidase<br />
from E. coli as a gene fusion marker. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,<br />
88: 8447-8451.<br />
Rohini, V.K. and Sankara Rao, K. 2000. Transformation of peanut<br />
(Arachis hypogaea L.): A non-tissue culture based approach for<br />
generating transgenic plants. Plant Sci., 150(1): 41-49.<br />
Samina Noor, Tayyab Husnain, Sheikh Riazuddin. 2000. Screening for<br />
putative transgenic rice and cotton plants: A simple and easy method.<br />
Pakistan Journal of Pakistan, 3(12): 2226-2228.<br />
Sankara Rao, K. and Rohini, V.K. 1999. Agrobacterium-mediated<br />
transformation of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.): A simple<br />
protocol. Ann. Bot., 83: 347-354.<br />
Sankara Rao, K. and Rohini, V.K. 1999. Gene transfer into Indian<br />
cultivars of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) using Agrobacterium<br />
tumefaciens. Plant Biotechnology, 16(3): 201-206.<br />
Sanan-Mishra, N., Pham, X.H., Sopory, S.K. and Tuteja, N. 2005. Pea<br />
DNA helicase 45 overexpression in tobacco confers high salinity<br />
tolerance without affecting yield. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102:<br />
509-514.<br />
Singla-Pareek, S.L., Reddy, M.K. and Sopory, S.K. 2003. Genetic<br />
engineering of the glyoxalase pathway in tobacco leads to enhanced<br />
salinity tolerance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100: 14672-14677.<br />
Venkategowda Ramegowda, Muthappa Senthil-Kumar, Karaba, N.<br />
Nataraja, Malireddy K. Reddy, Kirankumar, S. Mysore, Makarla<br />
Udayakumar. 2012. Expression of a finger millet transcription<br />
factor, EcNAC1, in tobacco confers abiotic stress-tolerance. PLoS<br />
ONE, 7(7): e40397.<br />
Xingnan Zheng, Bo Chen, Guojun Lu, Bin Han. 2009. Overexpression<br />
of a NAC transcription factor enhances reice drought and salt<br />
tolerance. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications,<br />
379(2): 985-989.<br />
Yong Xiang, Ning Tang, Hao, Du., Haiyan, Ye, Lizhong Xiong. 2008.<br />
Characterization of OsbZIP23 as a key player of the basic leucine<br />
zipper transcription factor family for conferring abscisic acid<br />
sensitivity and salinity and drought tolerance in rice. Plant<br />
Physiology, 148(4): 1938-1952.<br />
Recieved on 22-02-<strong>2013</strong> Accepted on 28-02-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 112-114, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Efficacy of Different Herbicides for Weed Control in Transplanted Rice (Oryza sativa.<br />
L) Under Vertisols of Rajasthan<br />
CHANDRA PRAKASH, R.K. SHIVRAN, N.R. KOLI AND J.C. SHARMA<br />
Agricultural Research Station, Ummedganj, Kota, Maharana Pratap University of Agricultural &Technology,<br />
Udaipur<br />
email: rshivranars2007@gmail.com<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
The study was carried out during kharif season of 2007 and<br />
2008 at the Agricultural Research Station, Ummedganj, Kota<br />
(Rajasthan). The experiment was laid out in randomized block<br />
design with tweleve treatments replicated four times. The major<br />
weeds observed in the experimental plots included grasses<br />
Echinochloa colonum and Echinochloa crusgalli sedges like<br />
Cyperus rotundus, Cyperus difformis and Cyperus iria and broad<br />
leaf weeds Eclipta alba, Euphorbia hirta L, Commelina diffusa<br />
and Ammania baccifera. Among the herbicides tested,<br />
Pretilachlor 50 EC @ 0.750 kg a.i.ha -1 at 3-5 days after<br />
transplanting registered significantly lowest weed density (16<br />
& 15), weed dry weight (29.34 & 22.10 g m -2 ) at 60 DAT over<br />
other herbicidal treatments, leading to highest weed control<br />
efficiency of 79.73 and 90.23% and lowest weed index value of<br />
(3.95 and 14.52) and highest herbicidal efficiency index (1.82<br />
and 2.21), higher number of panicles m -2 (381 and 278), panicle<br />
weight (3.70 and 3.80 g), grain (4.96 and 4.23 t ha -1 ) and straw<br />
yield (6.61 and 5.81 t ha -1 ) in 2007 and 2008, respectively. The<br />
per cent increase in grain yield was 34.78 and 42.42 with the<br />
application of pretilachlor 50 EC @ 0.750 kg a.i. ha -1 at 3-5 days<br />
after transplanting over non weeded control in 2007 and 2008,<br />
respectively<br />
Key words<br />
Efficacy, Weed flora, Pretilachlor, Transplanted rice.<br />
Weed control<br />
Rice (Oryza sativa.L) is one of the most important food<br />
crops in the world. In India, it is cultivated on an area of 44<br />
million ha, which accounts for about 45% of food grain<br />
production and 55% of cereal production in the country. The<br />
weed flora under transplanted condition is very much diverse<br />
and consists of grasses, sedges and broad leaved weeds The<br />
effective control of weeds at initial stages (0-40 DAT) can<br />
help in improving the productivity of rice. However, the crop<br />
is subjected to greater weed competition for various growth<br />
resources, viz., nutrients, light and space because both crop<br />
and weed seeds emerge at the same time and its yield is reduced<br />
up to 50–100% (Singh, et al., 2004). Traditionally weed control<br />
is done by hand weeding, which is drudgery and also during<br />
the peak periods, weeding become rather difficult due to costly<br />
and scarcity of labour. In view of the above facts, the present<br />
study was undertaken to evaluate bio efficacy of different<br />
herbicides on weed dynamics and yield of transplanted rice in<br />
south east plain zone of Rajasthan.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
The study was carried out during kharif season of 2007<br />
and 2008 at the Agricultural Research Station, Ummedganj,<br />
Kota (Rajasthan).which is situated in between 25 0 11 ‘N latitude<br />
and 75 0 54’ E longitude with an altitude of 273 m mean sea<br />
level The soil was clayey in texture, slightly alkaline in reaction<br />
(pH 7.5), low in organic carbon (0.49 %) and medium in available<br />
nitrogen (278 kg ha -1 ), medium in available phosphorus (14.3<br />
kg ha -1 ) and high in available potassium (305 kg ha -1 ). The<br />
experiment was laid out in randomized block design with<br />
tweleve treatments comprises of Pretilachlor 50 EC @ 0.500 kg<br />
a.i.ha -1 at 3-5 DAT, Pretilachlor 50 EC @ 0.750 kg a.i.ha -1 at 3-<br />
5 DAT, Triasulfuran 20 WSG @ 0.006 kg a.i ha -1 at 5-7 DAT,<br />
Triasulfuran 20 WSG @ 0.009 kg a.i. ha -1 at 5-10 DAT,<br />
Triasulfuran 20 WSG @ 0.006 kg a.i. ha -1 at 12-15 DAT,<br />
Triasulfuran 20 WSG @ 0.009 kg a.i ha -1 at 12-15 DAT,<br />
Triasulfuran 20 WSG + Pretilachlor 50 EC @ 0.006 + 0.005 kg<br />
a.i ha -1 at 5-7 DAT, Triasulfuran 20 WSG + Pretilachlor 50 EC<br />
@ 0.009 + 0.005 at 5-7 kg a.i ha -1 DAT, Bensulfuron-methyl 60<br />
DF @ 0.05 kg a.i ha -1 at 20-25 DAT, Bensulfuron-methyl 60 DF<br />
@ 0.05 kg a.i.ha -1 at 20-25 DAT, Two hand weeding (20 and 40<br />
DAT) and Non weeded control replicated four times. Fertilizers<br />
were applied to the plots as N-P-K @ 120-60-40 kg ha -1 through<br />
Urea, SSP, Muriate of potash respectively. The whole amount<br />
of P and K was applied as basal dose during final land<br />
preparation. N was top-dressed in three equal splits at 20, 40<br />
and 55 DAT. The variety ‘Ratna’ was used as the test crop.<br />
Thirty-day old rice seedlings were transplanted 20 cm x 10 cm<br />
apart on 23 rd July, 2007 and 25 th July, 2008 at the seed rate of<br />
25 kg in nursery for one hectare. Two sprays of<br />
Monocrotophos @ 1 litre ha -1 were applied as prophylactic<br />
measure against insects-pests. The crops were kept under<br />
constant observation from transplanting till harvesting. The<br />
data on weed infestation and weed density were collected<br />
from each plot at 60 DAT. A quadrate of 0.25 m 2 was placed<br />
randomly at three different spots outside an area of 12 m 2 in<br />
the middle of the plot. The average number of three samples<br />
was then multiplied by 4 to obtain the weed density per m 2 .<br />
The collected weeds were first dried in the sun and then in an<br />
electric oven for 72 hours maintaining a constant temperature<br />
of 80°C. After drying, weight of each species was taken and<br />
expressed in g m -2 . Weed control efficiency and weed index<br />
was calculated with the following formula:
CHANDA PAKASH et al., Efficacy of Different Herbicides for Weed Control in Transplanted Rice (Oryza sativa. L) 113<br />
Weed control efficiency (WCE) = DMC –DMT x 100<br />
DMC<br />
Where: DMC = Weed dry matter production in unweeded<br />
treatment<br />
DMT = Weed dry matter production in weed control treatment<br />
Weed index = Yield in weed free plot- Grain yield in treated plot X 100<br />
Yield in weed free plot<br />
Herbicide Efficiency Index = YT-YC X 100/YC divided<br />
by DMT x 100/DMC,<br />
Where, YT and YC stand for the yields of treated and<br />
weedy control, respectively, while DMT and DMC refer to<br />
respective weed dry matter. The Weed Persistency index and<br />
HEI denote the tolerance of weeds to a particular treatment<br />
and efficiency of various herbicide doses in eradicating weeds,<br />
respectively. A lower value of WPI and higher value of HEI<br />
depict satisfactory levels of weed control. Results of both the<br />
years were analysed statistically and data which did not show<br />
the homogeneity hence were given individual year- wise Least<br />
Significant Differences (LSD), was used for means verification<br />
and for discussion of the results under probability level of<br />
0.05.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Weed flora<br />
The major weeds observed in the experimental plots<br />
included grasses Echinochloa colonum and Echinochloa<br />
crusgalli sedges like Cyperus rotundus, Cyperus difformis<br />
and Cyperus iria and broad leaf weeds Eclipta alba,<br />
Euphorbia hirta L, Commelina diffusa and Ammania<br />
baccifera. Emergence of these weeds was observed during<br />
20–30 days after transplanting and there after it continuously<br />
emerged throughout the growth stages.<br />
Effect on weed density, weed dry weight and weed control<br />
efficiency<br />
Experimental results (Table 1) revealed that among the<br />
herbicides tested, Pretilachlor 50 EC @ 0.750 kg a.i.ha -1 at 3<br />
days after transplanting registered significantly lowest weed<br />
density (16 and 15), weed dry weight (29.34 and 22.10 g m -2 ) at<br />
60 DAT over other herbicidal treatments, leading to highest<br />
weed control efficiency of 79.73 and 90.23% and lowest weed<br />
index value of (3.95 and 14.52) and highest herbicidal efficiency<br />
index (1.82 and 2.21) in 2007 and 2008, respectively. These<br />
results reflected its selectivity and high bio-efficacy in<br />
controlling and suppressing weed growth effectively at the<br />
initial growth stage and no phytotoxicity on rice plant. The<br />
similar results have also been reported by Ravisankar, et al.,<br />
2008, Bhambri and Kolhe, 2006 and Duary, et al., 2005. However,<br />
two hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAT registered lowest weed<br />
density (9 and 8), weed dry weight (5.43 and 3.64 g m -2 ) at 60<br />
DAT, respectively in 2007 and 2008.<br />
Effect on Yield attributes<br />
Results revealed (Table 2) that the highest yield<br />
attributes viz., number of panicle (398 and 302) and panicle<br />
weight (3.88 and 3.90 g) was recorded in two hand weeded<br />
plot respectively in 2007 and 2008. This might be due to<br />
minimum crop-weed competition for growth factors. Among<br />
the herbicide tested significantly higher number of panicles<br />
m -2 (381 and 278) and panicle weight (3.70 and 3.80 g) were<br />
recorded with pretilachlor 50 EC @ 0.750 kg a.i./ha at 3-5 days<br />
after transplanting over other treatments viz., Pretilachlor 50<br />
Table 1.<br />
Effect of weed control practices on weed density, weed control efficiency, weed index and herbicidal efficiency index in<br />
rice.<br />
Treatments<br />
Weed density Dry weight of weeds<br />
(g m -2 )<br />
Weed control<br />
efficiency<br />
Weed<br />
index<br />
Herbicide<br />
efficiency index<br />
2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008<br />
Pretilachlor @ 0.500 kg ha -1 at 3-5 DAT 32 30 83.21 66.00 61.39 80.13 13.74 27.57 0.31 0.36<br />
Pretilachlor 0.750 kg ha -1 at 3-5 DAT 16 15 29.34 22.10 79.73 90.23 3.95 14.53 1.82 2.21<br />
Triasulfuran @ 0.006 kg ha -1 at 5-7 DAT 38 42 96.76 64.24 54.15 72.01 17.83 26.65 0.24 0.40<br />
Triasulfuran @ 0.009 kg ha -1 at 5-7 DAT 21 19 47.50 36.06 74.06 87.62 9.91 20.77 0.84 1.02<br />
Triasulfuran @ 0.006 kg ha -1 at 12-15 55 65 97.21 85.00 33.64 57.13 21.23 29.35 0.15 0.24<br />
DAT<br />
Triasulfuran @ 0.009 kg ha -1 at 12-15 DAT 33 37 78.12 57.98 59.34 75.66 16.90 25.07 0.32 0.49<br />
Triasulfuran + Pretilachlor @ 0.006 +0.500 42 46 68.46 52.16 48.72 69.37 18.23 22.63 0.33 0.64<br />
kg ha -1 at 5-7 DAT<br />
Triasulfuran + Pretilachlor @ 0.009 +0.500 58 68 35.78 30.55 29.78 54.97 24.33 15.46 0.27 1.54<br />
at 5-7 kg ha -1 DAT<br />
Bensulfuron-methyl @ 0.05 kg ha -1 at 20-25 26 24 98.23 92.73 68.27 84.00 12.20 30.62 0.32 0.19<br />
DAT<br />
Bensulfuron-methyl @ 0.05 kg ha -1 at 20-25 52 61 93.47 78.24 36.53 59.60 19.69 27.88 0.21 0.30<br />
DAT<br />
Two hand weeding (20 and 40 DAT) 9 8 5.43 3.64 - - - - - -<br />
Non weeded control 83 89 115.0 131.2 - - - -<br />
SEm ± 1.50 1.41 2.42 2.27<br />
CD (P=0.05) 4.89 4.40 7.23 6.88
114 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
Table 2.<br />
Effect of weed control practices on yield attributing characters and yield of rice<br />
Treatments<br />
No. of panicles<br />
m -2<br />
Panicle weight<br />
(g)<br />
Grain yield<br />
( t ha -1 )<br />
Straw yield<br />
(t ha -1 )<br />
Harvest<br />
Index<br />
2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008<br />
Pretilachlor @ 0.500 kg ha -1 at 3-5 DAT 358 252 3.40 3.52 4.46 3.59 6.32 5.08 41.35 41.38<br />
Pretilachlor 0.750 kg ha -1 at 3-5 DAT 381 278 3.70 3.80 4.96 4.23 6.61 5.81 42.89 42.92<br />
Triasulfuran @ 0.006 kg ha -1 at 5-7 DAT 352 256 3.36 3.44 4.25 3.63 5.90 5.05 41.83 41.86<br />
Triasulfuran @ 0.009 kg ha -1 at 5-7 DAT 375 270 3.51 3.72 4.65 3.93 6.14 5.17 43.13 43.16<br />
Triasulfuran @ 0.006 kg ha -1 at 12-15 DAT 337 247 3.24 3.25 4.07 3.50 5.65 4.86 41.85 41.88<br />
Triasulfuran @ 0.009 kg ha -1 at 12-15 DAT 345 260 3.41 3.50 4.29 3.71 5.97 5.16 41.83 41.86<br />
Triasulfuran + Pretilachlor @ 0.006 +0.500 kg ha -1 at 5-7 DAT 336 266 3.34 3.63 4.22 3.83 5.57 5.05 43.13 43.16<br />
Triasulfuran + Pretilachlor @ 0.009 +0.500 at 5-7 kg ha -1 DAT 327 275 3.20 3.76 3.91 4.19 5.43 5.63 41.85 41.88<br />
Bensulfuron-methyl @ 0.05 kg ha -1 at 20-25 DAT 369 242 3.45 3.18 4.54 3.44 6.47 4.90 41.20 41.23<br />
Bensulfuron-methyl @ 0.05 kg ha -1 at 20-25 DAT 325 248 3.28 3.27 4.15 3.57 5.66 4.87 42.30 42.33<br />
Two hand weeding (20 and 40 DAT) 398 302 3.88 3.90 5.35 4.72 7.51 6.81 41.60 41.63<br />
Non weeded control 317 235 3.15 3.12 3.68 2.97 5.01 4.05 42.30 42.33<br />
SEm ± 7.7 6.0 0.04 6.07 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.12 0.64 0.66<br />
CD (P=0.05) 22.1 17.8 0.12 0.22 0.29 0.30 0.28 0.35 NS NS<br />
EC @ 0.500 kg a.i.ha -1 at 3-5 DAT, Triasulfuran 20 WSG @<br />
0.006 kg a.i ha -1 at 5-7 DAT, Triasulfuran 20 WSG @ 0.009 kg<br />
a.i. ha -1 at 5-10 DAT, Triasulfuran 20 WSG @ 0.006 kg a.i. ha -<br />
1<br />
at 12-15 DAT, Triasulfuran 20 WSG @ 0.009 kg a.i ha -1 at 12-<br />
15 DAT, Triasulfuran 20 WSG + Pretilachlor 50 EC @ 0.006 +<br />
0.005 kg a.i ha -1 at 5-7 DAT, Triasulfuran 20 WSG + Pretilachlor<br />
50 EC @ 0.009 + 0.005 at 5-7 kg a.i ha -1 DAT, Bensulfuronmethyl<br />
60 DF @ 0.05 kg a.i ha -1 at 20-25 DAT, Bensulfuronmethyl<br />
60 DF @ 0.05 kg a.i.ha -1 at 20-25 DAT,<br />
Effect on Yield<br />
Results obtained from the experiment revealed that<br />
among the chemical weed management practices, Application<br />
of pretilachlor 50 EC @ 0.750 kg a.i. ha -1 at 3-5days after<br />
transplanting produced significantly higher grain (4.96 and<br />
4.23 t ha -1 ) and straw yield (6.61 and 5.81 t ha -1 ) respectively, in<br />
both the years of experimentation over all other herbicidal<br />
treatments. The per cent increase in grain yield was 34.78 &<br />
42.42 due to the weed control with pretilachlor 50 EC @ 0.750<br />
kg a.i. ha -1 at 3-5 days after transplanting over non weeded<br />
control in 2007 and 2008, respectively. This was owing to the<br />
fact that pretilachlor 50 EC @ 0.750 kg a.i. ha -1 at 3-5 days after<br />
transplanting produced maximum crop growth, and thereby<br />
the increased accumulation of photosynthates in reproductive<br />
parts, which ultimately brought about marked improvement in<br />
yield. Gnanasambandan and Murthy, 2000 and Singh and<br />
Singh, 2010 have also reported that treatments which had<br />
better growth and yield attributes had resulted higher grains<br />
yields. However, the maximum grain yield (5.35 & 4.72 t ha -1 )<br />
was obtained with two hand weeding at 20 & 40 DAT<br />
respectively in 2007 & 2008.<br />
Thus the present findings indicated that pretilachlor 50<br />
EC @ 0.750 kg a.i ha -1 at 3-5 days after transplanting can be<br />
recommended for effective control over weeds as well as<br />
getting higher yield during kharif season in transplanted rice<br />
ecosystem under south east plain zone of Rajasthan.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Bhambri, M.C. and Kolhe, S.S. 2006. Possibilities of green manuring in<br />
direct seeded rice (Oryza sativa) and its impact on weed dynamics.<br />
In: Extended summaries. National Symposium on Conservation<br />
Agriculture and Environment, Indian Society of Agronomy, held<br />
during 26–28 October, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, pp.<br />
314.<br />
Duary, B., Hossain, A. and Mondal, D.C. 2005. Integrated weed<br />
management in direct seeded dry sown rice in lateritic belt of West<br />
Bengal. Indian Journal of Weed Science 37(1/2): 101–2.<br />
Gnanasambandan, S. and Murthy, P.B. 2000. Effect of tillage practices<br />
and pre-emergence herbicides application for weed control in wetseeded<br />
rice. Advances in Agricultural Research in India, 14: 115-<br />
20.<br />
Ravisankar, N., Chandrasekaran, B., Raja, R., Din, M. and Chaudhuri,<br />
S.G. 2008. Influence of integrated weed management practices on<br />
productivity and profitability of wet seeded rice (Oryza sativa).<br />
Indian Journal of Agronomy, 53(1): 57-61.<br />
Singh, M. and Singh, R.P. 2010. Efficacy of herbicides under different<br />
methods of direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) establishments. Indian<br />
Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 80(9): 815–819.<br />
Singh, V.P., Singh, Govindra and Singh, Mahendra. 2004. Effect of<br />
fenoxaprop-P-ethyl on transplanted rice and associated weeds.<br />
Indian Journal of Weed Sciences, 36: 190-92.<br />
Recieved on 01-03-<strong>2013</strong> Accepted on 13-03-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 115-117, <strong>2013</strong><br />
Bio-efficacy of Herbicide Combination on Weed Control and Yield Performance of<br />
Transplanted Rice (Oryza sativa. L)<br />
CHANDRA PRAKASH, R.K. SHIVRAN, N.R. KOLI AND J.C. SHARMA<br />
Agricultural Research Station, Ummedganj, Kota, Maharana Pratap University of Agricultural and Technology,<br />
Udaipur<br />
email: rshivranars2007@gmail.com<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
A field experiment was conducted during kharif season of 2008<br />
and 2009 at Agricultural Research Station, Ummedganj, Kota<br />
(Rajasthan) to study the efficacy of herbicide combination on<br />
weed control and yield performance of transplanted rice.<br />
Application of Glyphosate @ 0.75 kg a.i. ha -1 at 15 days before<br />
crop establishment + Bensulfuron - methyl + pretilachlor<br />
(6.6GR) @ 0.06 + 0.60 kg a.i.ha -1 at 8-15 DAT was found most<br />
effective in lowering the weed density of grassy and non-grassy<br />
weeds and their dry weight, and thus enhancing yield attributes<br />
and yield (6.06 and 5.76 t ha -1 ) of rice, respectively in both the<br />
years. Among the weed control treatments maximum weed<br />
control efficiency (83.83 and 82.37%) and higher herbicide<br />
efficiency index (2.82 and 2.39) was under this treatment<br />
compared with the other sequential application of herbicides.<br />
On other hand weed control efficiency of different herbicide<br />
combinations were like wise, Glyphosate@0.75kg a.i. ha -1 at 15<br />
days before crop establishment + Butachlor@1.5 kg a.i. ha -1 at<br />
0-5 DAT (69.07 and 80.60 %) and Butachlor@1.5 kg a.i. ha -1 at<br />
0-5 DAT (70.14 and 72.02%), followed by alone applications of<br />
Glyphosate@0.75kg a.i. ha -1 at 15 days before crop establishment<br />
(64.21 and 69.17)<br />
Key words<br />
Bio-fficacy, Weed flora, Herbicide combination,,<br />
Transplanted rice, Weed control<br />
In India rice is gown in an area of around 44 million ha<br />
annually with a production of 104 million tones contributing<br />
45 % of the total food grain production of the country. Weed<br />
competition is one of the prime yield limiting biotic constraints<br />
in rice. Transplanted rice, in particular, is infested by<br />
heterogeneous types of weed flora consisting of grassy,<br />
broadleaf weeds and sedges causing yield reduction up to<br />
76%. Effective control of weeds had increased the grain yield<br />
by 85.5% (Mukherjee and Singh 2004). About 60% of weeds<br />
emerge during 7-30 days after transplanting and strongly<br />
compete with rice plants up to maximum tillering stage. Weeds<br />
are most competitive when the crop is small. So, controlling<br />
weeds when preparing the land for a rice crop is essential.<br />
Weed seed should be allowed to germinate and then killed<br />
before flooding or drilling the crop. Ploughing is traditionally<br />
used to bury weeds, but this is laborious and costly. Nonselective<br />
herbicides which control a broad spectrum of weeds<br />
can be used. Herbicides like glyphosate have no residual<br />
activity in the soil and do not affect the rice crop. Glyphosate<br />
gives good control of perennial weeds. They found that notill<br />
could save the time and costs associated with ploughing<br />
and that the soil structure improved so water management<br />
was better. Therefore, timely weed control at early stage is<br />
imperative for realizing desired level of productivity from<br />
transplanted rice. The use of herbicides offers selective and<br />
economic control of weeds right from the beginning, giving<br />
crop an advantage of good start and competitive superiority.<br />
Moreover, continuous use of same herbicides leads to a shift<br />
of weed flora and annual sedges (Rajkhowa, et al., 2006).<br />
Therefore, the present study was undertaken to evaluate bioefficacy<br />
of herbicide combination on weed control and yield<br />
performance of transplanted rice.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
A field experiment was conducted during kharif season<br />
of 2008 and 2009 at the Agricultural Research Station,<br />
Ummedganj, Kota (Rajasthan). The soil was clayey in texture,<br />
slightly alkaline in reaction (pH 7.5), low in organic carbon<br />
(0.49%) and medium in available nitrogen (278 kg ha -1 ), medium<br />
in available phosphorus (14.3 kg ha -1 ) and high in available<br />
potassium (305 kg ha -1 ). The experiment was laid out in<br />
randomized block design with seven treatments comprises of<br />
Glyphosate @ 0.75kg a.i. ha -1 at 15 days before crop<br />
establishment (T1), Butachlor@1.5 kg a.i. ha -1 at 0-5 DAT<br />
(T2), Bensulfuron - methyl + pretilachlor (6.6GR) @ 0.06 + 0.60<br />
kg a.i.ha -1 at 8-15 DAT (T3), Glyphosate @ 0.75kg a.i. ha -1 at<br />
15 days before crop establishment + Butachlor@1.5 kg a.i.<br />
ha -1 at 0-5 DAT (T4 ), Glyphosate @ 0.75kg a.i. ha -1 at 15 days<br />
before crop establishment + Bensulfuron - methyl + pretilachlor<br />
(6.6GR) @ 0.06 + 0.60 kg a.i.ha -1 at 8-15 DAT (T5), Hand<br />
weeding twice (20 and 40 DAT) (T6) and Non weeded control<br />
(T7) replicated four times. Fertilizers were applied to the plots<br />
as N-P-K @ 120-60-40 kg/ha from Urea, SSP, MOP respectively.<br />
The whole amount of P and K was applied as basal dose<br />
during final land preparation. N was top-dressed in three equal<br />
installments at 20, 40 and 55 DAT, respectively The variety<br />
‘Jaya’ was used as the test crop Thirty-day old rice seedlings<br />
were transplanted 20 cm x 10 cm apart on 25 th July, 2008 and<br />
28 th July, 2009 at the seed rate of 25 kg in nursery for one<br />
hectare. Two sprays of Monocrotophos @ 1 litre ha -1 were<br />
applied as prophylactic measure against insects-pests. The<br />
crops were kept under constant observation from transplanting<br />
till harvesting. The data on weed infestation and weed density<br />
were collected from plot at 60 DAT. A quadrate of 0.25 m 2 was<br />
placed randomly at three different spots outside an area of 12<br />
m 2 in the middle of the plot. The infesting species of weeds
116 Trends in Biosciences 6 (1), <strong>2013</strong><br />
within each quadrate were identified and their number was<br />
counted species-wise. The average number of three samples<br />
was then multiplied by 4 to obtain the weed density per m 2 .<br />
The collected weeds were first dried in the sun and then in an<br />
electric oven for 72 hours maintaining a constant temperature<br />
of 80°C. After drying, weight of each species was taken and<br />
expressed in g/m. Weed control efficiency and Herbicidal<br />
efficiency index were calculated with the following formula:<br />
Weed control efficiency (WCE) = DMC –DMT X<br />
100<br />
DMC<br />
Where, DMC = Weed dry matter production in Unweeded<br />
treatment<br />
DMT = Weed dry matter production in weed control treatment<br />
Weed index = Yield in weed free plot- Grain yield in treated plot X 100<br />
Yield in weed free plot<br />
Herbicide Efficiency Index (HEI) = YT-YC X 100/YC divided<br />
by DMT x 100/DMC,<br />
Where, YT and YC stand for the yields of treated and<br />
weedy control, respectively, while DMT and DMC refer to<br />
respective weed dry matter. The Weed Persistency index and<br />
HEI denote the tolerance of weeds to a particular treatment<br />
and efficiency of various herbicide doses in eradicating weeds,<br />
respectively. A lower value of WPI and higher value of HEI<br />
depict satisfactory levels of weed control. Results of both the<br />
years were analyzed statistically and data which did not show<br />
the homogeneity hence were given individual year- wise Least<br />
Significant Differences (LSD), was used for means verification<br />
and for discussion of the results under probability level of<br />
0.05.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Weed Flora<br />
The major weeds observed in the experimental plots<br />
included grasses Echinochloa colonum and Echinochloa<br />
crusgalli sedges like Cyperus rotundus, Cyperus difformis<br />
Table 1.<br />
and Cyperus iria and broad leaf weeds Eclipta alba and<br />
Ammania baccifera.<br />
Effect on Weed control<br />
Effect of different herbicide combination on weed<br />
density, dry weight of weeds, and weed control efficiency<br />
given in Table 1. The results revealed that all the herbicide<br />
combination gave significant control of weed population over<br />
non weeded control. However, the highest weed control<br />
efficiency was given by twice hand weeding (91.80 and<br />
89.57%), respectively in both the years. These findings are in<br />
agreement with Rekha, et. al., 2002 who reported that twice<br />
hand weeding resulted in lower weed density compared to<br />
weedicides and untreated control. Among the weedicides<br />
combinations tested, application of Glyphosate @ 0.75kg a.i.<br />
ha -1 at 15 days before crop establishment + Bensulfuron -<br />
methyl + pretilachlor (6.6GR) @ 0.06 + 0.60 kg a.i.ha -1 at 8-15<br />
DAT was most effective in lowering the weed density (9 and<br />
19) and their dry weight (12.35 and 15.63 g), weed competition<br />
index (5.78 and 4.33), higher weed control efficiency (83.83<br />
and 82.37%) and herbicide efficiency index (2.82 and 2.39)<br />
thus enhancing yield attributes and yield (6.06 and 5.76 t ha -1 )<br />
of rice, respectively in both the years.. The results further<br />
revealed that weed density reduced significantly in all the<br />
treated plots over untreated (check) plots. These findings are<br />
in accordance with Singh, et. al., 2007 who reported 20 to 63%<br />
yield losses in uncontrolled weed fields. It means that in<br />
uncontrolled weed fields, their densities continuously<br />
remained increasing that may adversely affect the crop growth.<br />
These results are in close conformity with the findings of<br />
Mukherjee and Singh (2004).<br />
Effect on yield attributes and yield<br />
All the weed control treatment combinations<br />
significantly reduced the weeds as compare to weedy check<br />
and recorded higher yield attributes and grain yield of rice<br />
(Table 2). Significantly higher number of panicles m -2 (347 and<br />
363) and panicle weight (3.68 and 3.70 g), grain yield (6.06 and<br />
Effect of herbicide combination on weed density, dry weight of weeds, weed competition index, weed control efficiency<br />
and herbicidal efficiency index in rice.<br />
Treatments<br />
Weed<br />
density<br />
Dry weight of<br />
weeds (g)<br />
Weed<br />
competition index<br />
(%)<br />
Weed control<br />
efficiency (%)<br />
Herbicide<br />
efficiency index<br />
2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009<br />
Glyphosate@0.75kg a.i /ha -1 at 15 days before crop establishment 24 23 27.33 27.33 13.3 14.03 64.21 69.17 0.95 0.90<br />
Butachlor@1.5 kg a.i. ha -1 at 0-5 DAT 19 20 22.8 24.81 10.99 13.09 70.14 72.02 1.26 1.04<br />
Bensulfuron - methyl + pretilachlor (6.6GR) @ 0.06 +0.60 kg<br />
a.i.ha -1 at 8-15 DAT<br />
46 45 50.2 60.35 24.29 18.28 34.26 31.93 0.26 0.32<br />
Glyphosate@0.75kg a.i /ha -1 at 15 days before crop establishment +<br />
Butachlor@1.5 kg a.i ha -1 at 0-5 DAT<br />
21 13 23.6 17.2 12.15 5.79 69.09 80.60 1.16 2.06<br />
Glyphosate@0.75kg a.i. ha -1 at 15 days before crop establishment +<br />
Bensulfuron - methyl + pretilachlor (6.6GR) @ 0.06 +0.60 kg a.i 9 10 12.35 15.63 5.78 4.33 83.83 82.37 2.82 2.39<br />
ha -1 at 8-15 DAT<br />
Hand weeding twice (20 and 40 DAT) 5 6 6.26 9.25 - - 91.80 89.57 6.65 4.66<br />
Non weeded control 68 72 76.36 88.66 35.27 32.73 - - - -<br />
CD (P=0.05) 6.2 4 4.54 3.05
Table 2.<br />
CHANDA PAKASH et al., Bio-efficacy of Herbicide Combination on Weed Control and Yield Performance 117<br />
Effect of herbicide combination on yield attributes and yield of transplanted rice.<br />
Treatments<br />
No of panicles<br />
m -2<br />
Panicle weight<br />
(g)<br />
Grain yield<br />
( t/ha)<br />
2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009<br />
Glyphosate@0.75kg a.i. /ha at 15 days before crop establishment 322 334 3.38 3.38 5.58 5.18<br />
Butachlor@1.5 kg a.i. /ha at 0-5 DAT 330 342 3.47 3.42 5.72 5.23<br />
Bensulfuron - methyl + pretilachlor (6.6GR) @ 0.06 +0.60 kg a.i./ha at 8-15 303 310 3.20 3.16 4.83 4.92<br />
DAT<br />
Glyphosate@0.75kg a.i. /ha at 15 days before crop establishment +<br />
325 356 3.44 3.63 5.65 5.47<br />
Butachlor@1.5 kg a.i. /ha at 0-5 DAT<br />
Glyphosate@0.75kg a.i. /ha at 15 days before crop establishment +<br />
347 363 3.68 3.70 6.06 5.76<br />
Bensulfuron - methyl + pretilachlor (6.6GR) @ 0.06 +0.60 kg a.i./ha at 8-15<br />
DAT<br />
Hand weeding twice (20 and 40 DAT) 368 388 3.92 3.92 6.43 6.02<br />
Non weeded control 268 278 2.91 2.85 4.16 4.05<br />
CD (P=0.05) 15 16 0.18 0.15 0.29 0.22<br />
5.76 t ha -1 ) of rice, respectively in both the years. were observed<br />
in plots treated with Glyphosate @ 0.75kg a.i. ha -1 at 15 days<br />
before crop establishment + Bensulfuron - methyl + pretilachlor<br />
(6.6GR) @ 0.06 + 0.60 kg a.i.ha -1 at 8-15 DAT. The per cent<br />
increase in grain yield of rice was 45.67 and 42.22 over nonweeded<br />
check respectively in 2008 and 2009.. All the weedicides<br />
combination showed significantly higher number of panicles<br />
and panicle weight over the non-weeded check. This was due<br />
to the fact the less competition for moisture, light and nutrient<br />
uptake by the crop plants. The higher assimilation of<br />
photosynthates in weedicide treated plots may be the reason<br />
for higher yield attributes and ultimately higher yield. The<br />
results were in close conformity with those of Kumar and<br />
Sharma, 2005, Singh, et al., 2005 and Amarjit, et al., 2006.<br />
Thus, the combination of Glyphosate @ 0.75kg a.i. ha -1<br />
at 15 days before crop establishment + Bensulfuron - methyl<br />
+ pretilachlor (6.6GR) @ 0.06 + 0.60 kg a.i.ha -1 at 8-15 DAT<br />
may be recommended in transplanted rice for controlling<br />
predominant weeds of south east plain zone of Rajasthan.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Amarjit, S., Bali, Singh, Mahinder Kachroo Dileep, Sharma, B.C. and<br />
Shivam, D.R. 2006. Efficacy of herbicides inntransplanted, medium-<br />
duration rice under sub-tropical conditions of Jammu. Indian Journal<br />
of Agronomy, 51(3): 128-30.<br />
Kumar, M. and Sharma, G. 2005. Effect of herbicides alone and in<br />
combination on direct seeded rice. Indian Journal of Weed Science,<br />
37(3/4): 197-201.<br />
Mukherjee, P.K. and Singh, R.P. 2004. Efficacy of low doses of herbicides<br />
on divergent weed flora in transplanted rice. Oryza, 41(1): 20-23.<br />
Rajkhowa, D.J., Borah, N., Barua, I.C. and Deka, N.C. 2006. Effect of<br />
pyrazosulfuron ethyl on weeds and productivity of transplanted<br />
rice during rainy season. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 38(1&2):<br />
25-8.<br />
Rekha, K.B., Raju, M.S. and Reddy, M.D. 2002. Effect of herbicides in<br />
transplanted rice. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 34(1-2): 123-<br />
125.<br />
Singh, Purshotam, Singh, Parmeet, Singh, Rekhi and Singh, K.N. 2007.<br />
Efficacy of new herbicides in transplanted rice under temperate<br />
conditions of Kashmir. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 39(3&4):<br />
167-71.<br />
Singh, V.P., Govindra, S., Singh, R.K., Singh, S.P., Abnishkumar,<br />
V.C.D., Kumar, M. and Sharma, G. 2005. Effect of herbicides<br />
alone and in combination on direct seeded rice. Indian Journal of<br />
Weed Science, 37(3/4): 197-201.<br />
Recieved on 01-03-<strong>2013</strong> Accepted on 14-03-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 118-119, <strong>2013</strong><br />
SHORT COMMUNICATION<br />
Genetic Variability, Heritability and Correlation Studies in Wheat Genotypes<br />
(Triticum aestivum L.)<br />
EKTA S<strong>IN</strong>GH 1 , RAMTEKE P.W. 2 , M. RAM 2 , B.A. WANI 2 AND SADHNA S<strong>IN</strong>GH 3<br />
Department of Biological Sciences 1 , Genetics and Plant Breeding 2 , Plant Protection 3<br />
Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, (Formerly Allahabad Agriculture Institute)<br />
Allahabad U.P. 211 007<br />
email: ekta1701@gmail.com 1<br />
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the most important<br />
crop of the world and contributes about 40% of India’s food<br />
grain pool. The present investigation was conducted for<br />
selected 24 genotypes to determine the extent of genetic<br />
variability, genetic coefficient, heritability, genetic advance<br />
and correlation of different characters in wheat.<br />
The field experiment was carried at the experimental field<br />
of Genetics and Plant Breeding/ Seed Science and Technology,<br />
Department of GPB, SHIATS, Allahabad. The experimental<br />
methods consist of 24 diverse wheat lines. The trail was laid<br />
down in RBD with three replications during two consecutive<br />
years (2009-2010 and 2010-2011) with average plot size of 3<br />
sq.cm. sowing was done during both the years at the row to<br />
row spacing of 20 cm apart and 5 cm plant to plant distances.<br />
The observation were recorded on 5 randomly selected plants<br />
from each line in each replicate for 17 characters Table 1. The<br />
phenotypic and genotypic coefficient of variability was<br />
calculated according to the method suggested by Burton,<br />
1953. For estimation of heritability (Broad sense), genetic<br />
advance and correlation were calculated according to the<br />
suggested by Johnson, et al., 1955.<br />
Analysis of variance of two year data revealed significant<br />
differences among the genotypes for all the traits indicating<br />
the presence of sufficient genetic variability in the genotypes<br />
and considerable scope for their improvement. Sufficient<br />
genetic variability for many of the quantitative traits studied<br />
in wheat. The extent of variability with respect to 17 characters<br />
in different genotypes is measured in terms of range, genotypic<br />
coefficient of variation (GCV), phenotypic coefficient of<br />
variation (PCV), along with the heritability expected genetic<br />
advance and genetic advance as percentage of mean (GAM)<br />
are given in (Table 1). The considerable amount of variation<br />
was observed for all the characters. The phenotypic<br />
coefficient of variability (PCV) was at par with the genotypic<br />
coefficient of variability in all the characters (Table 1). The<br />
estimates of GCV and PCV were high for leaf nitrogen (35.34<br />
and 35.44), gluten content (32.47 and 32.70), chlorophyll a<br />
(18.62 and 19.13), total chlorophyll (16.19 and 17.10), tillers per<br />
plant (13.58 and 15.66) and low for harvest index (3.08 and<br />
4.16). The yield per plot (11.51 and 11.70) and spike length<br />
(11.20 and 11.52) recorded higher GCV and PCV values for<br />
yield attributing traits in wheat which was also reported by<br />
Walia and Garg, 1996 and Gupta and Verma, 2000. The high<br />
heritability was noticed for protein content (%) (99.63%) and<br />
low for chlorophyll b (66.70%). This indicates that chlorophyll<br />
b is highly influenced by environmental factors and not much<br />
exploited as selection criteria while all those which<br />
demonstrated high heritability values could be exploited as<br />
selection criteria by integrating with conventional breeding<br />
methods. Our findings are supported by observation of Singh<br />
and Singh, 2001 and Dwivedi, et al., 2002. Similarly, among<br />
yield and yield traits , yield is a well known trait not directly<br />
under genetic control (Grafius, 1965). But among the yield<br />
component characters, the heritability for tillers/plant<br />
(75.15%), spike length (94.46), grains/spike (93.84%) and 1000<br />
grain weight (94.75%) were found of very high order. Therefore<br />
these characters are well under genetic control and selection<br />
can result high yielding lines. Shoran, 1995 also reported high<br />
heritability for 1000 grain weight, harvest index, tillers/plant<br />
and plant height.<br />
In the present experiment, the study of correlation among<br />
different characters revealed that, in general the genotypic<br />
correlation coefficients were positive and of high order which<br />
indicate high degree of association of physiologic traits with<br />
the yield and yield components. This indicates that the<br />
physiologic traits such as chlorophyll-a had significant<br />
positive correlation with grain yield/plot and yield components<br />
like 1000 grain weight, spike length and tillers/plant and plant<br />
height; chlorophyll-b with grain yield/plot and yield<br />
components like grains/spike; total chlorophyll content with<br />
yield/plot; 1000 grain weight and plant height; leaf nitrogen<br />
with grain yield/plot, tillers/plot and 1000 grain weight; Harvest<br />
Index with 1000 grain/weight and grain filling period with plant<br />
height; Days to 50% flowering was found negatively correlated<br />
with plant height and days to maturity positively correlated<br />
with plant height.<br />
As regards genotypic correlation coefficient of<br />
physiologic traits with quality characteristics, chlorophyll a<br />
showed significant positive correlation with protein;<br />
chlorophyll b, showed negative correlation with gluten; total<br />
chlorophyll content showed positive correlation with protein<br />
content; leaf nitrogen showed positive correlation with protein
Table 1.<br />
Traits<br />
S<strong>IN</strong>GH et al., Genetic Variability, Heritability and Correlation Studies in Wheat Genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.) 119<br />
Range, mean, GCV, PCV, heritability and genetic advance of mean for 17 traits in wheat<br />
Range<br />
(pooled)<br />
Grand<br />
mean<br />
(Pooled)<br />
GCV= Genotypic coefficient of variance, PCV= Phenotypic coefficient of variance.<br />
GCV PCV Heritability<br />
(%) (Broad<br />
scence)<br />
Genetic<br />
advance<br />
Genetic advance as<br />
(%)of mean (Genetic<br />
gain)<br />
Chlorophyll a (mg/g) 0.62-1.49 1.29 18.62 19.13 94.70 0.46 37.32<br />
Chlorophyll b (mg/g) 0.25-0.45 0.36 15.61 19.11 66.70 0.09 26.26<br />
Total chlorophyll (mg/g) 1.02-1.92 1.60 16.19 17.10 89.66 0.50 31.59<br />
Leaf nitrogen (mg/g) 1.28-4.40 2.96 35.34 35.44 99.48 2.15 72.63<br />
Nitrate Reductase Activity 0.135-0.175 0.156 7.42 7.89 88.36 0.02 14.37<br />
Harvest Index(%) 40.08-46.03 43.27 3.80 4.16 83.46 3.09 7.15<br />
Grain Filling Period 33.83-44.00 39.56 5.91 6.16 91.78 4.61 11.66<br />
Days to 50% flowering 65.00-80.00 73.49 5.14 5.23 96.55 7.65 10.41<br />
Days to maturity 109.00-119.00 113.07 2.40 2.48 93.38 5.40 4.78<br />
Grains/spike 41.00-52.33 45.45 6.62 6.83 93.84 6.00 13.21<br />
1000 grain weight(gm) 32.04-47.64 39.76 10.26 10.55 94.75 8.17 20.55<br />
Spike length(cm) 9.58-14.34 11.73 11.20 11.52 94.46 2.63 22.43<br />
Gluten content (%) 4.12-11.98 7.45 32.47 32.70 98.60 4.95 66.43<br />
Protein content (%) 10.90-12.51 11.53 4.06 4.11 99.63 0.955 8.28<br />
Plant height (cm) 90.16-122.07 101.16 7.96 7.99 99.26 16.53 16.34<br />
Tillers/plant 5.50-9.83 8.06 13.58 15.66 75.15 1.95 24.25<br />
Grain yield/ plot 2.04-3.21 2.73 11.51 11.70 98.60 0.63 23.33<br />
content; NRA also showed negative correlation with both<br />
protein and gluten content; HI positive correlation with protein<br />
only. Grain filling period though non-significant but showed<br />
positive correlation with protein and gluten content. Days to<br />
50% flowering and maturity showed significantly negative<br />
correlation with gluten content and non-significant positive<br />
correlation with protein content.<br />
The physiologic traits like chlorophyll a, b, leaf nitrogen<br />
are synonym to enhance photosynthesis and higher NRA<br />
synonym to efficient in plant nutrient (Nitrogen) uptake from<br />
soil could be integrated with conventional breeding as<br />
selection criteria to enhance the yield without raising input<br />
level (nitrogen in particular). Not the least, integration of<br />
physiologic traits having higher correlation with yield and<br />
yield components can be tapped to achieve another<br />
breakthrough in the per se productivity of wheat. Our findings<br />
are supported by Collaku and Harrison, 2005, Mohammadi, et<br />
al., 2006, Limulwar, et al., 2003 who also independently<br />
reported significant positive correlation of chlorophyll with<br />
yield. Rafat and Malik, 2005 observed significant positive<br />
correlation of plant height with grain yield. Payal, et al., 2007<br />
observed significant positive correlation of Harvest Index and<br />
tillers/plant with grain yield.<br />
The present study showed the presence of considerable<br />
variations among wheat genotypes for all traits tested which<br />
gives an opportunity to plant breeders for the improvement<br />
of these traits. Genetic correlation coefficient analysis<br />
indicated that important agronomic traits are positively<br />
correlated with grain yield. This suggests a common genetic/<br />
physiological basis among these traits. Hence, simultaneous<br />
improvement of these traits would be possible and can be<br />
considered as suitable selection criteria for the development<br />
of high yielding wheat varieties.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Burton, G.W. 1952. Quantitative inheritance in grasses. Proc. 6 th Int.<br />
Grassland Cong., 1:227-283.<br />
Collaku, A. and Harrison, S.A. 2005. Heritability of water logging<br />
tolerance in wheat. Crop Sciences, 45:722-727.<br />
Dwivedi, A.N., Pawar, L.S. and Madan, S. 2002. Studies on variability<br />
parameters and characters association among yield and quality<br />
attributing traits in wheat. Haryana Agric Univ. J. Res., 32:77-80.<br />
Grafius, J.E. 1965. A geometry for plant breeding, Crop Science, 4:241-246.<br />
Gupta, S.K. and Verma, S.R. 2000. Variability ,heritability and genetic<br />
advance under normal and rainfed conditions in durum wheat. Indian<br />
J. Agric. Research, 34(2):122-125.<br />
Johnson, H.W., Robinson, H.R. and Comstock, R.E. 1955. Estimation<br />
of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agron. J.,<br />
47:477-433.<br />
Limulwar, S.R., Hatmode, C.N., Deotale, R.D., Vandana, D.B., Mahalle,<br />
S.N. and Pawar, P.S. 2003. Correlation of biochemical and yield<br />
contributing parameters with seed yield in mustard. J. of Soils and<br />
crops., 13(1):158-161.<br />
Mohammadi, M., Ceccarelli, S. and Naghavi, M.R. 2006. Variability<br />
and genetic parameters for related traits to drought tolerance in<br />
double haploid population of barley (Hordium Vulgare)<br />
International J. of Agriculture and Biology, 8(5):694-697.<br />
Payal-Sexana, Rawat, R.S., Verma, J.S., and Meena, B.K. 2007. Variability<br />
and character association analysis for yield and quality traits in<br />
wheat. Pantnagar J. of Research, 5(2):58-60.<br />
Rafat-Sultan and Malik, S.K. 2005. Genetic variability and character<br />
association between yield and yield attributing traits in bread wheat<br />
(Triticum aestivum L.). Annals of Agriculture Research, 26(1):<br />
118-125.<br />
Raha, P. and Ramgiri, S.R. 1998. Genetic variability of metric traits in<br />
wheat and Triticales crosses over environment. Crop Research Hisar,<br />
16(3): 318-320.<br />
Shoran, J. 1995. Estimation of variability parameters and path<br />
coefficient for certain metric traits in winter wheat (Triticum<br />
aestivum L. em. Thell) Indian J. of Genet., pp.463-467.<br />
Singh, S.B. and Singh, T.B. 2001. Correlation and path analysis in common<br />
wheat under light texture soil. Research on crops, 2(1):99-101.<br />
Walia, D.P. and Garg, D.K. 1996. Evaluation of genetic divergence in<br />
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm. Indian J. of Genet.,<br />
56:452-457.<br />
Recieved on 08-11-2012 Accepted on 12-01-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 120-121, <strong>2013</strong><br />
SHORT COMMUNICATION<br />
Screening of Horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum) Genotypes against Horsegram<br />
Yellow Mosaic Virus (HgYMV) Disease in Karnataka<br />
PREMA, G.U. 1 , RUDRASWAMY, P. 2 , NAGARAJU 1 AND RANGASWAMY, K.T. 1<br />
1<br />
Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore 560 065<br />
2<br />
AICRP on Arid Legumes, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore 560 065<br />
email: prems.gu@gmail.com 1<br />
Horsegram [Macrotyloma uniflorum (Linn.)] is a hardy<br />
grain legume known for its easily digestible quality protein.<br />
The left over material after harvest has a great nutritional value<br />
and a relished feed for farm animals. The grains contain on an<br />
average of 22% protein and also a source of vitamins (Thakur,<br />
1979).<br />
Horsegram yellow mosaic virus disease transmitted by<br />
the whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) is prevalent in most<br />
parts of south India (Muniyappa and Reddy, 1976.,<br />
Muniyappa, et al., 1975 and Williams, et al., 1968). The disease<br />
incidence ranged from 50 to 100% in both summer and early<br />
rainy season crops (Muniyappa, et al., 1975) causing<br />
substantial loss in grain yield. The increasing spread of the<br />
yellow mosaic disease due to increase in Bemisia tabaci<br />
population which resulted in almost complete loss of the crop<br />
during summer (Muniyappa, et al., 1978).<br />
The chemical methods recommended for the<br />
management of HgYMV are not economical and practicable<br />
because of very low yield potential of the crop and the crop is<br />
mainly grown as alternate crop whenever early monsoon fails.<br />
Further, it is mainly grown in dry lands by marginal and poor<br />
farmers who have minimum resources to spend on chemicals.<br />
Therefore, the only feasible and economical method for control<br />
of HgYMV disease is the development of resistant varieties.<br />
Therefore, there is a need to screen larg number of germplasm<br />
lines to identify the resistant source to HgYMV. In the present<br />
study, 100 horsegram genotypes have been evaluated under<br />
field conditions with a view to identify resistant sources for<br />
HgYMV under field condition during 2011. Each genotype<br />
was sown in five meter long rows. A susceptible genotype<br />
was planted after every five tester lines to serve as a source<br />
for disease. The per cent disease severity in each genotype<br />
was recorded at fifteen days interval and they were grouped<br />
into different categories employing disease scoring scale<br />
suggested by Muniyappa, et al., 1987.<br />
Among the different genotypes screened, 38 genotypes<br />
viz., TCR 2S-A, TCR 1432, TCR 1177, TCR 392-C, TCR 365-A,<br />
TCR 425-A, TCR 886, TCR 171-A, TCR 1293, TCR 117-A, TCR<br />
1151, TCR 914, TCR 1135, TCR 450-A, TCR 1266, TCR 1449,<br />
TCR 244-A, TCR 1063, TCR 896, TCR 888, TCR 8-A, TCR<br />
Table 1.<br />
Grouping of horsegram genotypes/germplasm lines into different degree of resistance against Horsegram yellow<br />
mosaic virus (HgYMV) disease during 2011 under field condition<br />
Sl.<br />
Reaction<br />
No.<br />
1. Resistant<br />
(Small necrotic yellow specks with<br />
restricted spread covering 0.1-5% leaf<br />
area)<br />
2. Moderately resistant<br />
(Yellow mottling of leaves, covering<br />
10-15% leaf area)<br />
3. Moderately susceptible<br />
(Yellow mottling and discoloration of<br />
leaves covering 15.1-30% leaf area)<br />
4. Susceptible<br />
(Pronounced yellow mottling and<br />
discoloration of leaves, pods and<br />
reduction in leaf size and stunting of<br />
plants covering 50-75% of foliage)<br />
5. Highly susceptible<br />
(Sever yellowing of entire leaves,<br />
stunting of plants and no pod formation<br />
covering 85-100% of foliage)<br />
Genotypes<br />
TCR 2S-A, TCR 1432, TCR 1177, TCR 392-C, TCR 365-A, TCR 425-A, TCR 886, TCR 171-A, TCR<br />
1293, TCR 117-A, TCR 1151, TCR 914, TCR 1135, TCR 450-A, TCR 1266, TCR 1449, TCR 244-A,<br />
TCR 1063, TCR 896, TCR 888, TCR 8-A, TCR 1247, TCR 161-A, TCR 1295, TCR 872, TCR 1058, TCR<br />
307-A, TCR 66-A, TCR 151-A, TCR 1210, TCR 1303, TCR 275-A, TCR 873, TCR 1204, TCR 167-A,<br />
TCR 1050, TCR 116-A, TCR 1133<br />
TCR 1056, TCR 172-A, TCR 1291, TCR 1100, TCR 1433, TCR 2<br />
TCR 232-A, TCR 1290, TCR 95-A<br />
TCR 1016, TCR 74-A, TCR 275-A, TCR 883, TCR 1263, TCR 425-A, TCR 466-A, TCR 726, TCR 1076,<br />
TCR 288-A, TCR 1402, TCR 222-A, TCR 179-B, TCR 1450, TCR 1358, TCR 1240, TCR 215-A, TCR<br />
243-A, TCR 1113, TCR 848, TCR 1316, TCR 250-A, TCR 1214<br />
TCR 875, TCR 1330, TCR 731-A, TCR 193-A, TCR 206-A, TCR 189-A, TCR 1070, TCR 356-A, TCR<br />
557-A, TCR 432-A, TCR 182-A, TCR 434-A, TCR 282-A, TCR 453-A, TCR 489-A, TCR 1790-A, TCR<br />
1294, TCR 170-A, TCR 266-A, TCR 224-A, TCR 1292, TCR 122-A, TCR 61-A, TCR 134-A, TCR 29-A,<br />
TCR 85-A, TCR 904, TCR 874, TCR 59-A, TCR 1176
PREMA et al., Screening of horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum) genotypes against Horsegram Yellow Mosaic Virus 121<br />
1247, TCR 161-A, TCR 1295, TCR 872, TCR 1058, TCR 307-A,<br />
TCR 66-A, TCR 151-A, TCR 1210, TCR 1303, TCR 275-A, TCR<br />
873, TCR 1204, TCR 167-A, TCR 1050, TCR 116-A and TCR<br />
1133 showed resistant reaction. Six genotypes showed<br />
moderately resistant reaction. Three genotypes showed<br />
moderately susceptible reaction. 23 genotypes were found<br />
susceptible to the virus and remaining 30 genotypes showed<br />
highly susceptible reaction to HgYMV (Table 1). Muniyappa,<br />
et al., 1976 and 1978 screened horsegram genotypes for yellow<br />
mosaic virus disease under filed conditions during summer,<br />
1975 and the genotypes exhibiting mild as well as moderate<br />
symptoms for HgYMV were identified. The results are in<br />
conformity with the findings of Rajkumar, et al., 2009,<br />
Srinivasulu, et al., 1991 and Parimala, et al., 2011. The<br />
genotypes identified in the present study can be used in<br />
breeding programme for developing tolerant varieties as no<br />
other management methods are economical for the<br />
management of this disease.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />
First author thankfully acknowledges Department of<br />
Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi for providing<br />
financial assistance through Inspire programme.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Muniyappa, V., Chandrashekaraiah, S.C. and Shivashankar, G. 1978,<br />
Horsegram cultures tolerant to yellow mosaic. Indian J. Genet. Pl.<br />
Breed., 38: 148-149.<br />
Muniyappa, V., Rajeshweri, R., Bharathan, N., Reddy, D.V.R. and Nolt,<br />
B.L. 1987. Isolation and characterisation of a geminivirus causing<br />
yellow mosaic disease of horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum) in<br />
India. J. Phytopathol., 119: 81-87.<br />
Muniyappa, V. and Reddy, H.R. 1976. Studies on the yellow mosaic<br />
disease of horsegram (Dolichos biflorus L.)- Virus vector relationships.<br />
Mysore J. Agric. Sci., 10: 605-610.<br />
Muniyappa, V., Reddy, H.R. and Shivashankar, G. 1975. Yellow mosaic<br />
disease of Dolichos biflorus L. (horsegram). Curr. Res., 4: 176.<br />
Muniyappa, V., Reddy, H.R. and Shivashankar, G. 1976. Studies on the<br />
yellow mosaic disease on horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorus Syn.<br />
Dolichos biflorus). III. Evaluation of germplasm for the disease.<br />
Curr. Res., 5: 52-53.<br />
Parimala, K., Meenakumari, K. V.S., Sudhakar, R. and Kanaka Durga,<br />
K. 2011. Screening of horsegram genotypes against yellow mosaic<br />
and powdery mildew diseases, Indian J. Pl. Protect., 39: 160-161.<br />
Rajkumar, S.G., Prameela, H.A., Rangaswamy, K.T., Divya, B.L.,<br />
Shankarappa, K.S., Viswanatha, K.P. and Maruthi, M.N. 2009.<br />
Sources of resistance to Horsegram yellow mosaic virus disease. J.<br />
Pl. Protect. Environ., 6(1): 86-89.<br />
Srinivasulu, B., Rao, A.S., Basheeruddin, M. and Reddy, M.N. 1991.<br />
Reaction of some horsegram genotypes to yellow mosaic disease in<br />
Andhra Pradesh. Legume Res., 14(2): 101-102.<br />
Thakur, C. 1979. Horsegram. In: Scientific Crop Production, Vol. I,<br />
pp.319-320, Metropoliton Book Co. Pvt., New Delhi, pp.495.<br />
Williams, F.J., Grewal, J.S. and Amin, K.S. 1968. Serious and new diseases<br />
of pulse crops in India in 1966. Plant Dis. Reptr., 52: 300-304.<br />
Recieved on 05-10-2012 Accepted on 12-01-<strong>2013</strong>
Trends in Biosciences 6 (1): 122-123, <strong>2013</strong><br />
SHORT COMMUNICATION<br />
Evaluation of Garlic Genotypes Under Temperate Conditions of Kashmir Valley<br />
MUSHTAQ, A. CHATOO, PARVAZE, A. SOFI 1 , KHALID, R. DAR, ANGREZ ALI AND TASADUK SHAFI<br />
Faculty of Agriculture, SKUAST-K, Wadura, Sopore, 193 201, J&K, India<br />
e-mail: parvazesofi@gmail.com 1<br />
Garlic (Allium sativum L.) is one of the most important<br />
bulb vegetables, which is used as spice and flavoring agent<br />
for foods. Globally the leading producers include China with<br />
an area of 6.9 lakh hectares followed by India (1.7 lakh hectares)<br />
and Russia (0.28 lakh hectares) FAOSTAT, 2010.<br />
For any successful breeding programme, presence of<br />
adequate genetic variability is an important prerequisite.<br />
Breeders employ various selection strategies to utilize the<br />
available genetic variability for seeking improvement in<br />
economically important traits such as yield. Therefore, it is<br />
imperative to characterize the available germplasm resources<br />
in terms of nature and extent of variability. A number of workers<br />
have reported tremendous variability, association and direct<br />
and indirect effect among bulb yield and yield traits (Figliuolo,<br />
et al., 2001; Shri Dhar, 2002; Naruka and Dhaka, 2004 and<br />
Tsega, et al., 2010 in their work on garlic).Therefore, the present<br />
study was aimed at characterizing the germplasm aqquired<br />
under AICRP programme for development of locally suitable<br />
cultivars of garlic to boost the production and productivity.<br />
Present study which was conducted during 2010-11 at<br />
the research farm of Faculty of Agriculture, SKUAST-K,<br />
Wadura (34 o 17’ North and 74 o 33 E at altitude of 1594 m amsl),<br />
20 diverse genotypes (19 procured from Directorate of Onion<br />
and Garlic under AICRP and one local check) were evaluated<br />
in an Randomised Block Design with four replications. Each<br />
genotype was represented by 20 rows of 2 meter length with<br />
row to row spacing of 15 cm and plant to plant spacing of 10<br />
cm. Standard agronomic practices were followed to ensure a<br />
good crop. Data was collected for 13 quantitative traits (Table<br />
1) from 10 randomly selected competitive plants from each<br />
replication and subjected to standard statistical analysis.<br />
Variability components were calculated as per the<br />
method of Johnson, et al., 1955 and the correlation coefficients<br />
were computed following Aljibouri, et al., 1958.<br />
The results pertaining to mean performance of the<br />
germplasm accessions for 13 quantitative traits are presented<br />
in Table 1. Perusal of the means table reveals wide variation in<br />
trait expression and superiority of several genotypes over<br />
local check in respect of maturity, morphological and yield<br />
traits. The wide range and the mean suggested existence of<br />
sufficient variability among the tested genotypes for majority<br />
of characters indicating that there is considerable potential in<br />
improvement of garlic. High genetic variability has also been<br />
reported in garlic by Fugliuolo, et al., 2001 and Tsega, et al.,<br />
2010.<br />
Analysis of variance for the 13 traits (Table 2) revealed<br />
significant variance in all traits except for days to maturity,<br />
leaf length, leaf width, pseudo-stem length, equatorial diameter<br />
and marketable yield (%). This is also quite evident from small<br />
range and CV recorded for these traits. PCV estimates were<br />
invariably higher for all traits except days to maturity and<br />
marketable yield (%). Generally the PCV estimates were higher<br />
than their corresponding estimates of GCV possibly due to<br />
the influence of environment on these traits due to quantitative<br />
nature of the traits under study. PCV values ranged from 5.09<br />
% for Marketable bulb yield to 320.33 % for number of cloves,<br />
while as GCV values ranged from 3.46 % for Marketable bulb<br />
yield to 320.09 % for number of cloves. There was close<br />
correspondence in the values of GCV and PCV for number of<br />
leaves, average bulb weight, number of cloves, average clove<br />
weight and total yield, indicating greater correspondence<br />
between genotype and phenotype as is also depicted by high<br />
heritability estimates for these traits. Similar results have been<br />
reported by Tsega, et al., 2010 in garlic, Abayneh, 2001 in<br />
onion. Heritability (broad sense) estimates ranged from low<br />
(24%) in case of equatorial diameter to very high (99%) in<br />
case of number of cloves, but were invariably high for most of<br />
the traits, which indicates that there is scope for improvement<br />
for these traits through selection. Genetic gain was higher for<br />
all traits except days to maturity, leaf width and marketable<br />
yield (%). Generally in plant breeding, high mean, high<br />
heritability, high GCV and high genetic advance are taken as<br />
the indicators of the possible improvements in trait expression<br />
that could be achieved through appropriate selection<br />
strategies. In light of such proposition it is expected that traits<br />
like plant height, number of leaves, leaf length, pseudo-stem<br />
length, polar diameter, equatorial diameter, average bulb weight,<br />
number of cloves, average clove weight and total bulb yield<br />
would respond to selection as they posses high values of the<br />
important genetic parameters as outlined above.<br />
However, since most of the economically important traits<br />
are complex in inheritance especially the yield that is governed<br />
by a large number of traits through direct as well as indirect<br />
influences. Therefore, it is imperative to elucidate the nature<br />
and extent of trait interrelationships to arrive at an optimal<br />
selection index for improvement of yield.this is all ther more<br />
important in view of the general observation that direct<br />
selection for yield per se has been invariably less effective. In<br />
the present study, the degree of trait associations as measured<br />
by correlation coefficients revealed that the total bulb yield<br />
was significantly correlated with average bulb yield (r=0.898),
Table 1.<br />
Entry<br />
Table 2.<br />
Source of<br />
variation<br />
CHATOO et al., Evaluation of Garlic Genotypes under Temperate Conditions of Kashmir Valley 123<br />
Analysis of variance for different morphological and yield traits in Garlic<br />
d.f Days to<br />
maturity<br />
followed by average clove weight (r=0.842), leaf width<br />
(r=0.7980, equatorial diameter (r=0.796), leaf length (r=0.691),<br />
polar diameter (r=0.6880 and plant height (r=0.605). Yield was<br />
negatively correlated with pseudo-stem length (r=-0.249) even<br />
though the value was non significant.<br />
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Plant<br />
height<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
leaves<br />
Leaf<br />
length<br />
Abayneh, M. 2001. Variability 1. and association among bulb yield,<br />
quality and related traits in onion (Allium cepa L.). M.Sc. Thesis<br />
submitted to School of Graduate Studies, Alemaya University, pp.51.<br />
Polar Equatorial Average<br />
diameter diameter bulb<br />
weight<br />
Number<br />
of cloves<br />
Average<br />
clove<br />
weight<br />
Marketable<br />
bulb yield<br />
(%)<br />
Total yield<br />
Replication 3 51.85 32.93 0.29 11.22 0.42 1.49 0.46 0.41 18.56 13.23 230.92 33.68 833.03<br />
Genotypes 19 336.17** 422.31** 4.65 100.35** 1.09** 12.18** 2.33** 1.17* 853.13** 7175.63** 11128.86** 42.63** 37938.85**<br />
Error 57 42.34 41.56 0.41 11.89 0.17 1.70 0.26 0.46 11.35 2.98 186.67 10.26 503.36<br />
Table 3.<br />
Parameter<br />
Mean performance of 20 garlic genotypes for 13 quantitative traits.<br />
Days to<br />
maturity<br />
Variability Parameters for different morphological and yield traits in Garlic<br />
Days to<br />
maturity<br />
Plant<br />
height<br />
(cm)<br />
Plant<br />
height<br />
Number<br />
of leaves<br />
Number<br />
of leaves<br />
Leaf<br />
length<br />
(cm)<br />
Leaf<br />
length<br />
Leaf<br />
width<br />
(cm)<br />
Leaf<br />
width<br />
Pseudostem<br />
length<br />
(cm)<br />
Leaf Pseudostem<br />
width<br />
length<br />
Pseudostem<br />
length<br />
Polar<br />
diameter<br />
(cm)<br />
Polar<br />
diameter<br />
Equatorial<br />
diameter<br />
(cm)<br />
Equatorial<br />
diameter<br />
Average<br />
bulb<br />
weight<br />
(g)<br />
Average<br />
bulb<br />
weight<br />
Number<br />
of cloves<br />
Number of<br />
cloves<br />
Average<br />
clove<br />
weight<br />
(g)<br />
Average<br />
clove<br />
weight<br />
Marketable<br />
bulb yield<br />
(%)<br />
Marketable<br />
bulb yield<br />
(%)<br />
Total<br />
yield (g)<br />
AG 102 204.50 50.00 6.35 27.55 0.70 4.80 3.72 3.35 30.00 15.00 146.50 93.60 199.99<br />
AG 103 212.50 58.25 7.25 30.00 1.90 6.00 4.12 4.36 60.00 14.00 243.75 92.25 399.99<br />
AG 104 213.00 58.75 7.00 30.00 0.72 5.70 4.04 3.50 45.00 12.00 178.75 93.90 299.99<br />
AG 105 216.25 59.75 7.95 27.65 0.62 3.75 3.39 4.01 38.75 12.00 131.50 92.99 255.88<br />
AG 120 213.50 35.75 4.35 20.00 0.40 3.00 2.37 2.34 14.01 10.00 48.00 91.92 93.41<br />
AG 121 215.25 49.75 6.35 20.30 0.40 8.00 3.77 3.20 19.85 20.00 64.00 91.41 132.33<br />
BG 106 189.50 60.00 4.75 31.00 0.35 8.59 3.72 3.24 20.12 14.92 68.67 86.72 134.16<br />
BG 107 206.00 45.00 5.00 23.00 0.26 7.47 2.89 3.10 11.75 7.85 52.90 86.30 78.33<br />
BG 108 203.75 43.00 7.06 24.00 0.27 8.70 2.75 2.82 10.00 8.10 46.00 86.42 65.16<br />
BG 109 209.50 60.00 4.90 24.20 0.32 12.20 3.82 3.33 16.43 10.15 55.25 88.56 109.53<br />
BG 110 187.00 42.75 5.80 23.00 0.36 11.30 3.41 3.00 14.00 9.40 49.97 87.64 93.33<br />
BG 111 219.00 52.75 8.00 26.27 0.33 11.50 3.55 3.23 16.00 11.65 57.87 88.91 106.66<br />
CG 112 184.00 48.75 5.00 28.00 0.31 8.20 4.50 3.45 30.12 23.00 66.74 80.67 200.82<br />
CG 113 196.25 55.30 5.90 27.90 0.40 9.00 3.85 3.10 18.02 17.95 50.24 83.10 120.20<br />
CG 114 196.25 34.25 5.05 21.07 0.21 13.00 2.80 2.75 10.00 10.65 47.80 75.79 66.79<br />
CG 115 203.25 46.75 4.42 24.90 0.30 9.90 3.35 3.00 15.05 16.02 47.07 71.41 100.37<br />
CG 116 194.00 68.00 4.95 38.15 1.20 11.00 5.70 4.50 59.94 16.30 185.53 81.78 399.61<br />
CG 117 197.50 65.00 5.00 39.20 1.30 10.90 5.00 4.15 46.00 14.95 154.04 80.90 306.66<br />
CG 118 216.50 32.75 4.50 23.15 0.32 9.20 2.75 3.20 11.00 7.40 78.94 77.56 73.47<br />
CG 119 196.00 55.05 5.00 25.00 0.30 10.00 3.30 3.30 13.55 14.60 44.50 84.67 90.37<br />
Local 210.00 60.00 10.00 28.00 1.00 10.00 3.82 5.00 35.00 12.00 140.00 90.00 233.33<br />
Check<br />
Mean 203.97 51.50 5.93 26.77 0.57 8.67 3.64 3.42 25.45 13.23 93.23 86.02 169.54<br />
CV (%) + 10.48 9.97 1.48 5.05 0.43 2.75 0.77 0.63 16.07 4.06 59.12 6.23 107.13<br />
Mean 203.97 51.50 5.93 26.77 0.57 8.67 3.64 3.42 25.45 13.23 93.23 86.02 169.54<br />
Range 187.00-<br />
219.00<br />
32.75-<br />
68.00<br />
4.35-<br />
10.00<br />
21.07-<br />
39.20<br />
0.21-<br />
1.90<br />
3.00-<br />
13.00<br />
2.37-5.70 2.34-5.00 10.00-<br />
60.00<br />
7.40-23.00 46.00-<br />
146.50<br />
71.41-93.60 65.16-<br />
399.99<br />
σ 2 G 73.45 95.18* 1.60** 22.11 0.23 2.62 0.51* 0.18 210.44** 1793.15** 2735.54** 8.92 9108.12**<br />
σ 2 E 42.34 41.56 0.41 11.89 0.17 1.70 0.26 0.46 11.35 2.98 186.67 10.26 503.36<br />
PCV 5.27 22.70 26.30 21.78 110.95 23.97 24.10 23.39 58.51 320.33 57.98 5.09 57.82<br />
GCV 4.20 18.94 21.33 17.56 84.13 18.66 19.61 12.40 57.00 320.07 56.10 3.46 56.29<br />
Heritability 0.63 0.69 0.79 0.65 0.57 0.60 0.66 0.28 0.94 0.99 0.93 0.46 0.94<br />
(bs)<br />
Genetic<br />
Advance<br />
6.83 32.26 42.80 23.51 1.29 29.54 32.76 13.49 113.27 653.21 111.07 4.73 111.92<br />
Total<br />
yield<br />
FAO. 2010. FOASTAT. 2010.<br />
Figliuolo, G., Candido, V., Logozzo, G. and Zeuli, P.L.S. 2001. Genetic<br />
evaluation of cultivated garlic germplasm. Euphytica, 121: 325-<br />
34.<br />
Naruka, I.S. and Dhaka, R.S. 2004. Correlation studies in garlic (Allium<br />
sativum L.). Prog. Hort. 36: 128-31.<br />
Shri Dhar. 2002. Genetic variability and character association in garlic.<br />
Prog. Hort., 34: 88-91.<br />
Tsega, K., Tiwari, A. and Woldetsadik, K. 2010. Genetic variability,<br />
correlation and path coefficient among bulb yield and yield traits in<br />
Ethiopian garlic germplasm. Indian J. Hort., 67: 489-499.<br />
Recieved on 01-11-2012 Accepted on 28-12-2012
Trends in Biosciences 5 (1-4): 124-127, 2012<br />
Author Index<br />
Vol. 5 (1-4) 2012<br />
A<br />
Achahbar, Sanaa 266<br />
Afroza, Baseerat 343<br />
Aftab, Khan Uzma 218<br />
Ahmad, I. 306<br />
Ahmad, Iffat Zareen 218<br />
Ahmad, Ishfaq 136<br />
Ahmad, Nabeel 214<br />
Akhtar, Md. Humayoon 17<br />
Akhtar, Shirin 299<br />
Ali, Gowhar 97, 119, 136, 306<br />
Ali, Hasmat 225<br />
Ali, S.S. 71, 352<br />
Alim, Md. A. 287<br />
Anand, Lalitha 8<br />
Ansari, M.S. 41<br />
Ansari, Mohammad Israil 95<br />
Ansari, Rizwan Ali 202<br />
Arora, Neeraj 191<br />
Arulkirubakaran, M. 274<br />
Arya, Arvind 168<br />
Ashoka, H. G. 163<br />
Aziz, Ozair 101<br />
B<br />
Bahar, Fayaz Ahmed 107<br />
Bal, R.S. 127, 244<br />
Balai, Laxman Prasad 147, 152<br />
Barooah, Madhumita 220<br />
Behura, A.K. 287<br />
Bharadwaj, Renu 61<br />
Bharathiraja, B. 274<br />
Bhareti, Priyanka 161<br />
Bhat, F.A. 301<br />
Bhat, M. Afzal 284<br />
Bhat, Mohd. Yaqub 51<br />
Bhavani, P. 272, 312<br />
Bind, Akhilesh 214<br />
Biswas, Bikash Kanti 212<br />
Bora, Sudipta Sankar 220<br />
Boro, Robin Ch. 220<br />
Burange, P.S. 199<br />
C<br />
Capoor, Ajay 45, 57<br />
Chami, Fouzia 266<br />
Chami, Najat 266<br />
Chandra, Kunj 261<br />
Chandra, Sourav 212<br />
Chandran, M. 274<br />
Chaturvedi, Rajesh 218<br />
Chaubey, B.K. 64<br />
Chaudhary, Puja 349<br />
Choudhary, Saumya 89<br />
Choudhury, D. Roy 129, 143<br />
D<br />
Dar, Manzoor Hussain 284<br />
Dar, S.A. 97, 119, 338<br />
Dar, Z.A. 306, 317, 338, 343<br />
Das, M. 129, 143<br />
Das, Mrs. R. 212<br />
Dash, Debiprasad 234<br />
Deka, Archana 220<br />
Deshpande, Smita 61<br />
Devasahayam, Mercy 114<br />
Dhiman, Anil Kumar 1<br />
Durande, G.B. 196<br />
G<br />
Gade, R.S. 196<br />
Ganai, M.A. 338
Author Index Vol. 5 (1-4) 2012 125<br />
Gangaprasad, S. 184<br />
Gaur, Isha 176<br />
Gautam, K.M. 297<br />
Ghrmah, Hamid A. 166<br />
Gonde, A.D. 199<br />
Gowda, Byre 140<br />
Gulfishan, Mohd 14<br />
Gulzaffar 317<br />
Gupta, Dolly 301<br />
Gupta, Kamlesh 79<br />
Gupta, Nidhi 160<br />
Gupta, Praveen 1, 180<br />
Gupta, Suman 114<br />
Gupta, Vishal 301<br />
Gusain, Poonam 246<br />
H<br />
Habib, M. 317, 338, 343<br />
Hasan, Wajid 41<br />
Hussain, Barkat 284<br />
Hussain, K. 343<br />
I<br />
Iqbal Asif, M. 97, 306<br />
Ishfaq, A. 119<br />
J<br />
Jagtap, R.N. 196<br />
Jain, Piyush 22<br />
Janaiah, C. 205<br />
Jayamuthunagai, J. 274<br />
Jayaram, Neetha 140<br />
Jirli, Basvaprabhu 222<br />
Joshi, Anita 61<br />
Joshi, Sarita 79<br />
K<br />
Kalha, C.S. 301<br />
Kalita, Rituparna 220<br />
Kamaluddin 136<br />
Kanoujia, Budh Prakash 214<br />
Kant, Rama 225<br />
Kapoor, Shalini 191<br />
Karmakar, Prabir Kumar 212<br />
Karunakar, V. 205<br />
Katoch, Anu 54<br />
Kaur, Amandeep 176<br />
Kaur, Gurpreet 176<br />
Kaur, Harpreet 54, 133, 332<br />
Khan, Ainul Haq 14<br />
Khan, Khalil 346<br />
Khan, M. Luqman 111, 332<br />
Khan, M.H. 119<br />
Khan, Mohd Kamran 89<br />
Khan, S.H. 343<br />
Khan, Tabreiz Ahmad 202<br />
Khanna, Veena 133<br />
Krishna, Ram 225<br />
Krupakar, A. 208<br />
Kumar, A 199, 244<br />
Kumar, Anil 4, 47<br />
Kumar, Arvind 77, 310<br />
Kumar, Ashok 127<br />
Kumar, B. Ravi 74<br />
Kumar, Binod 261<br />
Kumar, G. N. Veera 140<br />
Kumar, H. B. Manoj 140<br />
Kumar, Jeewesh 154, 240<br />
Kumar, Jitendra 4<br />
Kumar, K. 64<br />
Kumar, Kshitij 171, 279<br />
Kumar, Rajesh 191, 246<br />
Kumar, Sandeep 168<br />
Kumar, Vinod 222<br />
Kumar, Vipul 68<br />
Kundagrami, S. 129, 143<br />
L<br />
Lahan, Jyoti Prasad 220
126 Trends in Biosciences 5 (1-4), 2012<br />
Lal, Gabrial M. 335<br />
Lal, Kanhaiya 225<br />
Lather, V.S. 315<br />
Lingaraju, S. 74<br />
Lodam, V. A. 122<br />
Lone, Aijaz A. 306<br />
M<br />
Madhusudhan, R 8, 184<br />
Madke, P.K. 310<br />
Mahesh, Y.S. 74<br />
Manjunath, B. 8, 74, 140<br />
Mankar, D.M. 349<br />
Manzar, Abu 119<br />
Markanday, Jagdish 326<br />
Marker, S. 208<br />
Masih, Sam A 114<br />
Masih, Sama 214<br />
Mastan, S.A. 35<br />
Mehandi, Suhel 261, 329<br />
Mishra, Abha 25<br />
Mishra, V.K. 64<br />
Mittal, Pallavi 176<br />
Mohiddin, F.A. 301<br />
N<br />
Nagaraja, T.G. 20<br />
Nagaraju, H. K. 140<br />
Naik, Abhishek 299<br />
Najeeb, S. 338<br />
Nanda, S.S. 287<br />
Nandni, Durgesh 31<br />
Nayeem, Md. Rashid 17<br />
Neha, Kumari 335<br />
Nehvi, F.A. 97<br />
O<br />
Ojha, M.D. 295<br />
P<br />
Pal, Rishi 38, 321<br />
Palakshappa, M.G. 74<br />
Pandey, Anamika 89<br />
Pandey, V. P. 11<br />
Panickar, B. 138, 149<br />
Panwar, R.K. 161<br />
Parida, D. 287<br />
Parray, G.A. 338<br />
Patel, I. S. 138, 149, 157<br />
Patel, J. R. 157<br />
Patel, P. S. 138, 149<br />
Patial, Pankaj 326<br />
Patil, P. P. 122<br />
Patil, P.D. 188<br />
Patil, S. S. 122<br />
Patil, V. A. 122<br />
Patro, H. 287<br />
Patro, Hrusikesh 234<br />
Pervez, Rashid 11, 71<br />
Pir, F.A. 119<br />
Pradhan, Bhavana 61<br />
Prakash, Chandra 104, 297<br />
Prasad, C.S. 38, 321<br />
Prasad, D. Theertha 272, 312<br />
Prasad, Keshav 47<br />
Prasad, P.S. 303<br />
Prashantha, G. M. 163<br />
R<br />
Raghuwanshi, Arun 31<br />
Rahman, S. M. A. 11<br />
Rai, Manju 176<br />
Rajput, M.M. 4<br />
Ramappa, M. 140<br />
Ramaswamy, G. R. 294<br />
Rangare, N.R. 329<br />
Ranjeet 225<br />
Ravi, B.A. 184<br />
Ravindrababu, Y. 138, 149
Author Index Vol. 5 (1-4) 2012 127<br />
Rawal, R. D. 294<br />
Reddy, S.M. 205<br />
Remmal, Adnane 266<br />
Risbud, Shilpa 61<br />
S<br />
Sachan, B.S. 4, 47<br />
Sagwal, Pardeep Kumar 289<br />
Saifulla, Muhammad 303<br />
Sarkar, M. 129<br />
Saroj, Pushpendra 222<br />
Sen, Anand 346<br />
Shah, Naseer Hussain 51<br />
Shahid, Mohd 68<br />
Shaikh, S.S. 20<br />
Shamim, Mohammad 231<br />
Sharan, Abhishek 214<br />
Sharma, Arun 297<br />
Sharma, Dinesh 289<br />
Sharma, J.C. 297<br />
Sharma, Poonam 133<br />
Sharma, R.C. 341<br />
Shikari, Asif 338<br />
Shivran, R.K. 104, 297<br />
Shrivastava, Vinoy Kumar 31<br />
Singh, A. P. 240<br />
Singh, Abhishek Pratap 11<br />
Singh, Anuradha 68<br />
Singh, Chandra Mohan 261, 329<br />
Singh, Charandeep 176<br />
Singh, D. C. 240<br />
Singh, Guriqbal 133<br />
Singh, H. 295<br />
Singh, Hamveer 77, 310<br />
Singh, Ishwer 289<br />
Singh, Jai 147, 152<br />
Singh, K. N. 107, 171, 279<br />
Singh, Krishna 25<br />
Singh, R. B. 147, 152<br />
Singh, S.K. 154<br />
Singh, Sunil Kumar 329<br />
Singh, Vir 246<br />
Sofi, P.A. 136<br />
Srinivasulu, Ch. 205<br />
Srivastava, Mukesh 68<br />
Srivastava, Richa 114<br />
Subha, Jyotsna 208<br />
T<br />
Tanveer, Hasan 77, 310<br />
Tarafdar, S. 143<br />
Tayade, D.S. 196<br />
Thakur, Neelam 332<br />
Thomas, George 89<br />
Tiwari, G.N. 38<br />
Tripathi, Atul 208<br />
Tulankar, K.P. 199<br />
U<br />
Usmani, Mohd. Kamil 17<br />
V<br />
Vashi, R. D. 122<br />
Verma, Anil K. 111<br />
Vijaya Mahantesha, S. R. 294<br />
Vivek, B.C. 8<br />
W<br />
Wagh, S.S. 188<br />
Wani, A.H. 51<br />
Wani, Shafiq. A. 317<br />
Wargantiwar, R.K. 199<br />
Warsi, Zeenat 45, 57<br />
Y<br />
Yadav, A.S. 341<br />
Yadav, C.B. 64<br />
Yogeesh, L. N. 184<br />
Z<br />
Zaffar, Gul 136
Trends in Biosciences 5 (1-4): 128-132, 2012<br />
A<br />
2, 4-D 171<br />
2, 4-D, somaclonal variation 279<br />
Abelmoschus esculentus 199<br />
Abiotic factors 17<br />
Abortion 212<br />
Absolute frequency 202<br />
Absolute 202<br />
Abundance 25<br />
Acrididae 17<br />
Activity 205<br />
Advance as per cent of mean 335<br />
Aeromonas hydrophila 35<br />
Agrobacterium 279<br />
Agro-morphometric 208<br />
Aligarh fort 17<br />
Alternaria alternate 205<br />
Alternaria 294<br />
Analysis of variance 338<br />
Anthracnose 140<br />
Anti bacterial 20<br />
Antibacteria 312<br />
Antibiotic resistance 101<br />
Antibody 212<br />
Anticarcinogenic effect 97<br />
Antifungal 312<br />
Antigen 212<br />
Antiglycemic effect 97<br />
Antiinsecticidal 312<br />
Aspergillus clavatus 205<br />
Aspergillus niger 214<br />
Assay 321<br />
Autecology 31<br />
Azotobacter 107<br />
B<br />
Bacillariophyceae 220<br />
Bacillus megatarium 20<br />
Bacillus 57<br />
Banana 8<br />
Basmati rice 289<br />
Bio 154<br />
Biocontrol 68<br />
Subject Index<br />
Vol. 5 (1-4) 2012<br />
Bioefficacy 41<br />
Bioenergy crops 89<br />
Bioenergy 89<br />
Bioethanol 214<br />
Biofertilizers 274<br />
Biofuels 89<br />
Biohydrogen 114<br />
Biological control 321<br />
Biomass 89<br />
Biopharma 1<br />
Bioprocess 180<br />
Biotechnology 1<br />
Blood Groups 191<br />
Bombyx mori 196<br />
Brachistin ae 231<br />
Braconidae 166, 231<br />
Brassica juncea 225<br />
Breeding 326<br />
Broad sense heritability 335<br />
Broad 61<br />
Brood-stock 326<br />
Brown sarson 317<br />
Brucella 212<br />
Bt. cotton 341<br />
C<br />
Cabbage aphid 284<br />
Cabbage 284<br />
Canal water 47<br />
Carbofuran 310<br />
Carp 326<br />
Cartaphydrochloride 310<br />
Catantopidae 17<br />
cDNA library 8<br />
Cell Culture 180<br />
Cell membrane 143<br />
Cellular damage 218<br />
Cellulase enzyme 214<br />
Cercospora 127<br />
Channa striatus 35<br />
Chemicals 51<br />
Chickpea 104, 119, 129, 240<br />
Chlorella 220
Subject Index Vol. 5 (1-4) 2012 129<br />
Chlorophyceae 220<br />
Clusters 64<br />
Coccicidal activity 266<br />
Coccidiosis 266<br />
Cocophilus 332<br />
Colletotrichum falcatum 95<br />
Colony Forming Unit (CFU) 303<br />
Combining ability 225, 317<br />
Combiningability 338<br />
Compatibility 71<br />
Component analysis 343<br />
Component traits 329<br />
Consumptions 4<br />
Cormel 168<br />
Cotton cultivators 349<br />
Cotton 332<br />
Coulombic efficiency 114<br />
Cow urine decoctions 41<br />
Cowpea 149<br />
Crop growth parameters 289<br />
Crop improvement 208<br />
Cross sowing 22<br />
Curcuma 11<br />
Cyanophyceae 220<br />
D<br />
Demand 4<br />
Density 202<br />
Desynapsis 14<br />
Diacrisia obliqua 45, 57<br />
Diallel 343<br />
Dietary patterns 4<br />
Disease Incidence 301<br />
Disease Severity 301<br />
Disease 127<br />
DOE 180<br />
Dolichos bean 140<br />
Dominance 25<br />
Dry bean 97<br />
Dual purpose mungbean 315<br />
Dynamics 284<br />
E<br />
Earias vittella 199<br />
Early blight 294<br />
Ecological factors 332<br />
Economics 289<br />
Efficacy insecticide 57<br />
Efficacy 45, 244<br />
Efficiency 163<br />
Egg hatch 54<br />
Eimeria oocyst 266<br />
Enterobacter 114<br />
Entomopathogenic nematodes 71, 321<br />
Entomopathogens 38<br />
Environment 338<br />
EO components 266<br />
Epidemic 95<br />
Escherchia coli 20<br />
Euglenophyceae 220<br />
Expressed sequence tag 8<br />
Extension gap 295<br />
Extention contact 349<br />
F<br />
Fababean 64<br />
False smut 301<br />
Farm yard manure (FYM) 287<br />
Fenugreek 299<br />
Fertilizers 47, 301<br />
Field capacity 163<br />
Field pea 244<br />
Fipronil 310<br />
FIRBS 22<br />
Foliar 140<br />
Food 4<br />
Formulation 45<br />
Free radical 218<br />
Fungicidal 205<br />
Fungicides 244<br />
Fusarium udum 303<br />
G<br />
Gall index 51<br />
Garlic 54<br />
gca 306, 317<br />
GCV 119<br />
Gene action 306<br />
Genetic advance 119, 329<br />
Genetic divergence 64<br />
Genetic variability 11<br />
Genetic 335<br />
Genotypes 157<br />
Germplasm 184, 299, 301, 315
130 Trends in Biosciences 5 (1-4), 2012<br />
Gladiolus 168<br />
Grain mould 74<br />
Grain yield 234<br />
Green foddern 136<br />
Growth 4, 22, 51<br />
H<br />
H. armigera 154, 240<br />
Hardening 176<br />
Harvesting 163<br />
Heat tolerance 143<br />
Heavy metals 101<br />
Helminth parasites 25<br />
Hemicriconemoides 332<br />
Herbicides 133<br />
Heritability 11, 119, 136, 329<br />
Heterohabditis indica 38, 321<br />
Heteropteran bugs 205<br />
Heterosis 122<br />
Hoagland solution 129<br />
Homolobus 166<br />
Hymenop tera 231<br />
Hypertension 191<br />
I<br />
Identification 111<br />
Ideotype 315<br />
Imbibition rate 129<br />
Impact 222<br />
In vitro growth 133<br />
India 231<br />
Indian patent law 1<br />
Indica rice 171, 279<br />
Infection 140<br />
Infertility 212<br />
Inheritance 184<br />
Inorganic fertilizers 274<br />
Input levels 22<br />
Insecticide resistance 341<br />
Insecticides 149, 199<br />
Instars 31<br />
IPM modules 188<br />
IPM 341<br />
IR 64 171, 279<br />
Irrigated groundnut 287<br />
Irrigation regimes 297<br />
K<br />
K 234<br />
Kharif Onion 295<br />
L<br />
Laggards 14<br />
Land degradation 47<br />
Land races 315<br />
Larval duration 196<br />
Leafhopper 138<br />
Lepidopteron 321<br />
Life history 31<br />
Line sowing 22<br />
Line x tester 122<br />
Lipaphis erysimi 41<br />
Lipid per oxidation 218<br />
Lipid Profile 191<br />
Liriomyza trifolii 188<br />
Livestock 161<br />
Longa 11<br />
Lymphocyte transformation 35<br />
M<br />
Maize 107, 157<br />
Management 199, 240<br />
Manure 104<br />
Maruca vitrata 149<br />
Mass production 38<br />
Maturation 326<br />
MDA 218<br />
Mean intensity 25<br />
Medium Optimization 180<br />
Meloidogyne javanica 352<br />
Meloidogyne 54<br />
MFC 114<br />
MIC 61<br />
Micrococcus sp. 20<br />
Micronuclei 14<br />
Micropropagation 176<br />
Microshoots 176<br />
Mint 54<br />
MMS 14<br />
Modulus of elasticity 163<br />
Monoclonal Antibodies 180<br />
Morphological traits 261<br />
Mortalit 45<br />
Moth bean 184<br />
Moth emergence 196<br />
Mulch 107<br />
Multiplication 176
Subject Index Vol. 5 (1-4) 2012 131<br />
Mungbean 147, 152<br />
Mutagenesis 208<br />
Mycrobes 274<br />
MYMV 127<br />
N<br />
N 234<br />
Natural 161<br />
Nematodes 352<br />
Net returns 22<br />
New species 166, 231<br />
Newer 149<br />
Nitrogen 107, 289<br />
Nodulation-efficiency 133<br />
Nodules 51<br />
North Karnataka 74<br />
Novel antimicrobial 61<br />
Novel insecticides 154<br />
Nutrient yield maximization 287<br />
O<br />
Oats 136<br />
Oocyst destruction 266<br />
Organic sources 234<br />
Organic substrates 68<br />
Ornamental 168<br />
Oryza sativa 301<br />
P<br />
P 234<br />
Papilio demoleus 31<br />
Papilionidae 31<br />
Patenting 1<br />
Pathogenicity 38<br />
PCV 119<br />
Pesticides 71<br />
Petrochemical industry 101<br />
Phosphorous levels yield 289<br />
Physiological traits 261<br />
Pigeonpea 154, 303<br />
PIs 312<br />
Pituitary gland 326<br />
Plant extracts 54<br />
Plant products 199<br />
Plant-parasitic nematodes 332<br />
Plasmid 8<br />
Pod infection 140<br />
Pollen fertility 14<br />
Polyenzyme formulation 61<br />
Population dynamics 240, 303<br />
Population index 31<br />
Population 284<br />
Pratylenchus thornei 352<br />
Premature birth 212<br />
Prevalence 25<br />
Production 4, 222<br />
Productivity 161<br />
Protein 104<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 20<br />
Pupal duration 196<br />
Pyrgomorphidae 17<br />
Q<br />
Quality traits 329<br />
R<br />
RBPT 212<br />
Reapers 163<br />
Red rot 95<br />
Red soil 346<br />
Regeneration 168, 171, 279<br />
Relative density 202<br />
Relative frequency 202<br />
Relative injury 143<br />
Renewable energy 89<br />
Resistance 127<br />
Resources 161<br />
Rhizobium 101, 133<br />
Rice 122, 171, 234, 261, 279, 329, 335, 338<br />
Root explant 168<br />
Root induction 176<br />
Root-knot nematode 51<br />
ROS 218<br />
Rotylenchulus reniformis 352<br />
Roving survey 140<br />
Rust 244<br />
S<br />
S content 234<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae 214<br />
Salinity tolerance 129<br />
Saudi Arabia 166<br />
sca 306, 317<br />
Scaly fishes 25<br />
Scent components 205<br />
Schizoprymnus 231<br />
Screening 157, 294<br />
Seed leaf 272
132 Trends in Biosciences 5 (1-4), 2012<br />
Seed 129, 138<br />
Seedling vigour 129<br />
Segregants 64<br />
Sequencing 8<br />
Shear stress 163<br />
Sodic soil 346<br />
Sodium azide 208<br />
Soil moisture 346<br />
Soil nitrogen fixation 161<br />
Soil 161<br />
Solid 214<br />
Sorghum 74<br />
Sowing dates 152<br />
Spacing 152<br />
Specific gravity 214<br />
Spectrum antimicrobial 61<br />
Spotted pod borer 149<br />
State fermentation 214<br />
Stembores 157<br />
STI 312<br />
Strawberry 111<br />
Subabul trypsin inh ibitor 312<br />
Subabul 272<br />
Substrate moisture levels 68<br />
Sucking pests 138, 341<br />
Sugarcane 95<br />
Surface sterilization 176<br />
Survey 74, 202, 352<br />
Survival 143<br />
Sustainable 161<br />
Swarna Transformation 279<br />
Swarna 171<br />
Sweet pepper 343<br />
Symbiosis 133<br />
Synergy 61<br />
T<br />
Technology dissemination 295<br />
Technology gap 295<br />
Technology index 295<br />
Test 35<br />
Thermostability 143<br />
Thrips 138<br />
Thuringiensis 57<br />
Tomato cultivars 294<br />
Tomato 188, 274<br />
Traits 208<br />
Treatment 129, 138<br />
Trypsin inhibitor 272<br />
Tubebell 47<br />
Turmeric 11<br />
U<br />
Urdbean 127<br />
V<br />
Variability 329, 335<br />
Variation 299<br />
Varietal effect 196<br />
Varities 284<br />
Vicia faba 352<br />
Vigna radiata L. 51<br />
W<br />
Wastewater 101<br />
Water stress 261<br />
Watershed development 222<br />
Web blight 147, 152<br />
Weed 107<br />
Wheat 208, 297<br />
Whitefly 138<br />
X<br />
X. bacaniboia 111<br />
X. insigne 111<br />
X. radicicola 111<br />
X. simillimum 111<br />
Xanthophyceae 220<br />
Xiphinema fragariae 111<br />
Y<br />
Yellow stem borer 310<br />
Yield component traits 261<br />
Yield components 122, 225<br />
Yield loss 147<br />
Yield 22, 122, 136, 143, 299, 338<br />
YMV 184<br />
Z<br />
Zea mays 306<br />
Zero tillage 297<br />
Zinc 346
Subscription Order Form<br />
Name : …………………………………………………………………………..............................................................<br />
Designation : …………………………………………………………………………..............................................................<br />
Organization : …………………………………………………………………………..............................................................<br />
Mailing Address : …………………………………………………………………………..............................................................<br />
City ............................................................................ State .........................................................................................<br />
Pin .............................................................................. Country ...................................................................................<br />
Phone ........................................................................ Mobile .....................................................................................<br />
E-mail ........................................................................ Fax ............................................................................................<br />
Subscription period January- December (Year)<br />
Annual Subscription Rates for <strong>2013</strong> :<br />
Version<br />
Author’s Contribution : Rs. 1000/paper (minimum upto 2 authors) and Rs. 500/paper for additional authors. **Same for SAARC,<br />
countries only soft copy.<br />
I herewith enclosed the DD/Cheque No. .................................................................................................... Dated : .......................................<br />
for an amount of Rs. ......................................................... Drawn on : ................................................................................................... Bank.<br />
Terms and Conditions:<br />
<strong>IN</strong>DIAN**<br />
in Rs./issue<br />
1. Online subscription includes online access<br />
Individual Institutional Single article<br />
FOREIGN <strong>IN</strong>DIAN FOREIGN <strong>IN</strong>DIAN<br />
in US$/issue in Rs.<br />
in US$ in Rs.<br />
2. Print subscription is volume based where as online subscription is Calendar year based<br />
3. Online subscription includes current subscription + Back Files (for last two years)<br />
4. Please add Rs. 50 for non-Delhi cheque and for non-Kanpur cheque Rs. 50<br />
FOREIGN<br />
in US$<br />
*Print /Number **1000* 50 2500 200 50 10<br />
**Online 1000 50 2500 200 150 25<br />
5. The online subscription should be send to : Print subscription and manuscript should be sent to<br />
indianjournals.com<br />
Dr. S. S. Ali<br />
B-9, Local Shopping Complex, ‘A’ Block Editor in Chief, H- 1312, VIP lane,<br />
Naraina Vihar, Ring Road<br />
Satyam Vihar, Avas Vikas No.1<br />
New Delhi 110 028, India<br />
Kalyanpur, Kanpur- 208018, U.P. India<br />
Phone: +91-11-45055555, 45055500 Mob. 09919388690, 09151175565<br />
Fax: + 91-11-25778876<br />
E-mail: ss_ali@rediffmail.com<br />
E-mail: info@indianjournals.com<br />
DD should be in favour of “Trends in Biosciences” for print version<br />
(State Bank of India, Kalyanpur, Kanpur, U.P. Branch Code 01962,<br />
A/c No. 31575871348)<br />
Kindly Note :<br />
All queries and complaints regarding online access of the journal should be addressed to Indianjournals.com while for print<br />
version to Editor in chief.<br />
For prompt delivery and communication please provide e-mail ID, mobile no. and complete contact details with pincode.
Instruction to the Authors<br />
www.trendsinbiosciencesjournal.com<br />
The journal of Trends in Biosciences is essentially devoted to the publication of original research papers on all aspects of<br />
biosciences. All papers and short communication submitted to Trends in Biosciences must be unpublished original works. The<br />
manuscripts in English should be in a finished form and typed on one side of A4 size paper and double spaced throughout with<br />
ample margins. Pages should be numbered consecutively beginning from the title page. Text in any format (tables and figure<br />
included or separately) on CD in MS word with two hard copies or sent through email to ss_ali@rediffmail.com as attached file<br />
(s) is preferred since it saves retyping.<br />
Research Papers: Each full length of research papers should be covered within 1500 words including tables and illustrations.<br />
Short communication should be within 175 words including tables, figures and references, in case of exceeding the limit, payment<br />
has to be made for extra materials by the authors. Correct language is the responsibility of the author. No editing or materials<br />
changes at the proof stage will be permitted. While short communication will have only title, authors name, address and e-mail<br />
followed by text and references. In case of full length paper authors should have the following headings.<br />
Title : The title to be typed in capital and small letters, author names (all capital) and affiliation (capital and small letters with<br />
italics fonts). Give e-mail address in italic fonts also. Manuscript must confirm to the journal style (see latest issue)<br />
ABSTRACT : The abstract should indicate the main findings of the papers and typed in bold, single space. It should be not<br />
more than 150 words. The abstract should be typed before the main text and intended ca. 2cm to the right of it.<br />
Key words 5-6 key words in italics should be given.<br />
Tables and figures : Table should be descriptive without and references to the text with heading in bold letters. Each table<br />
should be typed on a separate sheet. Figures whether line drawing or graph should be of good quality. Legends to figures should<br />
be given on a separate sheet. Tables and figures should be numbered consequently in Arabic numerals (Table 1., Table 2., Fig.1.,<br />
Fig.2.- 3) can be identified on the back by name (s) of the author(s).<br />
Introduction : This should be brief and related to aim of the study. The review of the literature should be pertinent to the<br />
theme of the paper. Extensive review and unnecessary details of earlier work should be avoided. Heading “introduction” should<br />
not be written.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS : When methods are well known, citation of the standard work is sufficient. All measurement<br />
should be in metric units.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION : The result should be supported by brief and adequate tables, graphs and charts, wherever<br />
needed.<br />
LITERATURE CITED : In the text, references should be cited as follows: two authors (Ali, and Pervez, 2005), three or more<br />
authors (Gaugler, et al., 2001). All references made in the text must be listed under LITERATURE CITED at the end of the text.<br />
References should be listed alphabetically by the authors, followed by the year of the publication. Journal titles should be cited<br />
in full and in italics, while for books the place of the publication should precede the name of the publisher, Example Strong, D.R.<br />
2002. Population of entomopathogenic nematodes in food webs. In: Entomopathogenic Nematology, (ed.Randy Gaugler) CAB<br />
International, ix + 387. pp. 225-240.<br />
Fox, P.C. and Atkinson, H.J. 1984. Glucose phosphate isomerase polymorphism in field population of the potato cyst<br />
nematode, Globedera rostochiensis and G. pallida. Annals of Applied Biology, 104(1):503-506.<br />
Submission of manuscript : Duplicate copy of manuscript along with soft copy (CD) should be submitted to the Editor in<br />
Chief, Dr. S.S. Ali, H-1312, VIP Lane, Satyam Vihar, Avas Vikas No. 1, Kalyanpur, Kanpur 208 018, India. The text may sent through<br />
e-mail to ss_ali@rediffmail.com. Payment must be made through Demand Draft/e-banking payable to State Bank of India,<br />
Kalyanpur Branch, (Branch code 01962, IFSC : SB<strong>IN</strong>0001962) Kanpur, U.P. India, in favour of account of “Trends in Bioscience”<br />
(Account number 31575871348) along with manuscript and send to Dr. S. S. Ali, Editor in Chief. For online subscription of<br />
journal contact info@indianjournals.com<br />
Copyright : copyright © of all papers published in Trends in Biosciences, acceptance of manuscript for Trends in Biosciences,<br />
automatically transfers the copyright to Trends in Biosciences The use of trade name or a propriety product does not constitute<br />
a guarantee of the product by the author (s) or the society and does not simply its approval to the exclusion of the products that<br />
may be suitable.
army printing press<br />
www.armyprintingpress.com<br />
Lucknow (0522) 2481164