Handbook of Essential Oils: Science, Technology, and Applications
Handbook of Essential Oils: Science, Technology, and Applications
Handbook of Essential Oils: Science, Technology, and Applications
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
ESSENTIAL<br />
OILS<br />
<strong>Science</strong>, <strong>Technology</strong>,<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>Applications</strong>
ESSENTIAL<br />
OILS<br />
Edited by<br />
K. Hüsnü Can Başer<br />
Gerhard Buchbauer<br />
<strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Science</strong>, <strong>Technology</strong>,<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>Applications</strong><br />
Boca Raton London New York<br />
CRC Press is an imprint <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
CRC Press<br />
Taylor & Francis Group<br />
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300<br />
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742<br />
© 2010 by Taylor <strong>and</strong> Francis Group, LLC<br />
CRC Press is an imprint <strong>of</strong> Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business<br />
No claim to original U.S. Government works<br />
Printed in the United States <strong>of</strong> America on acid-free paper<br />
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1<br />
International St<strong>and</strong>ard Book Number: 978-1-4200-6315-8 (Hardback)<br />
This book contains information obtained from authentic <strong>and</strong> highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been<br />
made to publish reliable data <strong>and</strong> information, but the author <strong>and</strong> publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity<br />
<strong>of</strong> all materials or the consequences <strong>of</strong> their use. The authors <strong>and</strong> publishers have attempted to trace the copyright<br />
holders <strong>of</strong> all material reproduced in this publication <strong>and</strong> apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this<br />
form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write <strong>and</strong> let us know so we may<br />
rectify in any future reprint.<br />
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part <strong>of</strong> this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized<br />
in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying,<br />
micr<strong>of</strong>ilming, <strong>and</strong> recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the<br />
publishers.<br />
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com (http://<br />
www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923,<br />
978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-pr<strong>of</strong>it organization that provides licenses <strong>and</strong> registration for a variety <strong>of</strong> users. For<br />
organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system <strong>of</strong> payment has been arranged.<br />
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, <strong>and</strong> are used only for<br />
identification <strong>and</strong> explanation without intent to infringe.<br />
Library <strong>of</strong> Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data<br />
Baser, K. H. C. (Kemal Hüsnü Can)<br />
<strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> essential oils : science, technology, <strong>and</strong> applications / K. Hüsnü Can Baser, Gerhard<br />
Buchbauer.<br />
p. cm.<br />
Includes bibliographical references <strong>and</strong> index.<br />
ISBN 978-1-4200-6315-8 (hardcover : alk. paper)<br />
1. Essences <strong>and</strong> essential oils--<strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong>s, manuals, etc. I. Buchbauer, Gerhard. II. Title.<br />
QD416.7.B37 2010<br />
661’.806--dc22 2009038020<br />
Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at<br />
http://www.taylor<strong>and</strong>francis.com<br />
<strong>and</strong> the CRC Press Web site at<br />
http://www.crcpress.com
Contents<br />
Editors .......................................................................................................................................... ix<br />
Contributors .................................................................................................................................. xi<br />
Chapter 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1<br />
K.Hüsnü Can Başer <strong>and</strong> Gerhard Buchbauer<br />
Chapter 2 History <strong>and</strong> Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research ....................................................... 3<br />
Karl-Heinz Kubeczka<br />
Chapter 3 Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> ........................................................................................ 39<br />
Chlodwig Franz <strong>and</strong> Johannes Novak<br />
Chapter 4 Production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> ................................................................................... 83<br />
Erich Schmidt<br />
Chapter 5 Chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> ................................................................................. 121<br />
Charles Sell<br />
Chapter 6 Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> .................................................................................... 151<br />
Barbara d’Acampora Zellner, Paola Dugo, Giovanni Dugo,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Luigi Mondello<br />
Chapter 7 Safety Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>: A Constituent-Based Approach .................. 185<br />
Timothy B. Adams <strong>and</strong> Sean V. Taylor<br />
Chapter 8 Metabolism <strong>of</strong> Terpenoids in Animal Models <strong>and</strong> Humans ................................ 209<br />
Walter Jäger<br />
Chapter 9 Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> .................................................................. 235<br />
Gerhard Buchbauer<br />
v
vi<br />
Contents<br />
Chapter 10 Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in the Central Nervous System ..................................... 281<br />
10.1 Central Nervous System Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in<br />
Humans .................................................................................................................. 281<br />
Eva Heuberger<br />
10.2 Psychopharmacology <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> ..................................................... 297<br />
Domingos Sávio Nunes, Viviane de Moura Linck, Adriana Lourenço da Silva,<br />
Micheli Figueiró, <strong>and</strong> Elaine Elisabetsky<br />
Chapter 11 Phytotherapeutic Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> ............................................................... 315<br />
Bob Harris<br />
Chapter 12<br />
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> Monographed in the<br />
European Pharmacopoeia 6th Edition ................................................................. 353<br />
Alex<strong>and</strong>er Pauli <strong>and</strong> Heinz Schilcher<br />
Chapter 13 Aromatherapy with <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> ....................................................................... 549<br />
Maria Lis-Balchin<br />
Chapter 14<br />
Chapter 15<br />
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Mammals ....................................................................................................... 585<br />
Yoshiaki Noma <strong>and</strong> Yoshinori Asakawa<br />
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Sesquiterpenoids, Ionones, Damascones, Adamantanes,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Aromatic Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals ..................... 737<br />
Yoshinori Asakawa <strong>and</strong> Yoshiaki Noma<br />
Chapter 16 Industrial Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> .......................................................................... 843<br />
W.S. Brud<br />
Chapter 17<br />
Encapsulation <strong>and</strong> Other Programmed Release Techniques for <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> Volatile Terpenes ........................................................................................... 855<br />
Jan Karlsen<br />
Chapter 18 Aroma-Vital Cuisine ............................................................................................ 863<br />
Maria M. Kettenring <strong>and</strong> Lara-M. Vucemilovic Geeganage<br />
Chapter 19 <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> Used in Veterinary Medicine ........................................................ 881<br />
K. Hüsnü Can Başer <strong>and</strong> Chlodwig Franz
Contents<br />
vii<br />
Chapter 20 Trade <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> ......................................................................................... 895<br />
Hugo Bovill<br />
Chapter 21 Storage <strong>and</strong> Transport <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> ............................................................... 903<br />
Klaus-Dieter Protzen<br />
Chapter 22<br />
Recent EU Legislation on Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances <strong>and</strong> Its Impact on<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> ........................................................................................................ 917<br />
Jan C.R. Demyttenaere<br />
Index .......................................................................................................................................... 949
Editors<br />
K. Hüsnü Can Başer was born on July 15, 1949 in Çankırı, Turkey. He<br />
graduated from the Eskisehir I.T.I.A. School <strong>of</strong> Pharmacy with diploma<br />
number 1 in 1972 <strong>and</strong> became a research assistant in the pharmacognosy<br />
department <strong>of</strong> the same school. He did his PhD in pharmacognosy<br />
between 1974 <strong>and</strong> 1978 at Chelsea College <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> London.<br />
Upon returning home, he worked as a lecturer in pharmacognosy at<br />
the school he had earlier graduated, <strong>and</strong> served as director <strong>of</strong> Eskisehir<br />
I.T.I.A. School <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering between 1978 <strong>and</strong> 1980. He<br />
was promoted to associate pr<strong>of</strong>essorship in pharmacognosy in 1981.<br />
He served as dean <strong>of</strong> the faculty <strong>of</strong> pharmacy at Anadolu University<br />
(1993–2001), vice-dean <strong>of</strong> the faculty <strong>of</strong> pharmacy (1982–1993), head <strong>of</strong><br />
the department <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional pharmaceutical sciences (1982–1993),<br />
head <strong>of</strong> the pharmacognosy section (1982–present), member <strong>of</strong> the<br />
University Board <strong>and</strong> Senate (1982–2001; 2007), <strong>and</strong> director <strong>of</strong> the Medicinal <strong>and</strong> Aromatic Plant<br />
<strong>and</strong> Drug Research Centre (TBAM) (1980–2002) in Anadolu University.<br />
During 1984–1994, he was appointed as the national project coordinator <strong>of</strong> Phase I <strong>and</strong> Phase II <strong>of</strong><br />
the UNDP/UNIDO projects <strong>of</strong> the government <strong>of</strong> Turkey titled “Production <strong>of</strong> Pharmaceutical<br />
Materials from Medicinal <strong>and</strong> Aromatic Plants,” through which TBAM had been strengthened.<br />
He was promoted to full pr<strong>of</strong>essorship in pharmacognosy in 1987. His major areas <strong>of</strong> research<br />
include essential oils, alkaloids, <strong>and</strong> biological, chemical, pharmacological, technological, <strong>and</strong> biological<br />
activity research into natural products. He is the 1995 Recipient <strong>of</strong> the Distinguished Service<br />
Medal <strong>of</strong> IFEAT (International Federation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> <strong>and</strong> Aroma Trades) based in London,<br />
United Kingdom <strong>and</strong> the 2005 recipient <strong>of</strong> “<strong>Science</strong> Award” (Health <strong>Science</strong>s) <strong>of</strong> the Scientific <strong>and</strong><br />
Technological Research Council <strong>of</strong> Turkey (TUBITAK). He has published 537 papers in international<br />
refereed journals (378 in SCI journals), 105 papers in Turkish journals, <strong>and</strong> 134 papers in<br />
conference proceedings.<br />
For more information: http://www.khcbaser.com<br />
Gerhard Buchbauer was born in 1943 in Vienna, Austria. He studied<br />
pharmacy at the University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, from where he received his<br />
master’s degree (Mag.pharm.) in May 1966. In September 1966, he<br />
assumed the duties <strong>of</strong> university assistant at the Institute <strong>of</strong> Pharmaceutical<br />
Chemistry <strong>and</strong> received his doctorate (PhD) in pharmacy <strong>and</strong><br />
philosophy in October 1971 with a thesis on synthetic fragrance compounds.<br />
Further scientific education was practised as post doc in the<br />
team <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essor C.H. Eugster at the Institute <strong>of</strong> Organic Chemistry,<br />
Univer sity <strong>of</strong> Zurich (1977–1978), followed by the habilitation (post<br />
doctoral lecture qualification) in Pharmaceutical Chemistry with the<br />
inaugural dissertation entitled “Synthesis <strong>of</strong> Analogies <strong>of</strong> Drugs <strong>and</strong><br />
Fragrance Compounds with Contributions to Structure-Activity-Relationships” (1979) <strong>and</strong><br />
appointment to the permanent staff <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, <strong>and</strong> head <strong>of</strong> the first department<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Institute <strong>of</strong> Pharmaceutical Chemistry. In November 1991, he was appointed as a full<br />
ix
x<br />
Editors<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna; in 2002, he was elected as head<br />
<strong>of</strong> this institute. He retired in October 2008. He is married since 1973 <strong>and</strong> was a father <strong>of</strong> a son<br />
since 1974.<br />
Among others, he is still a member <strong>of</strong> the permanent scientific committee <strong>of</strong> ISEO, a member <strong>of</strong><br />
the scientific committee <strong>of</strong> Forum Cosmeticum (1990, 1996, 2002, <strong>and</strong> 2008), a member <strong>of</strong> editorial<br />
boards (e.g., Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research, The International Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil<br />
Therapeutics, Scientia Pharmaceutica, etc.), assistant editor <strong>of</strong> Flavour <strong>and</strong> Fragrance Journal,<br />
regional editor <strong>of</strong> Eurocosmetics, a member <strong>of</strong> many scientific societies, for example, Society <strong>of</strong><br />
Austrian Chemists, head <strong>of</strong> its working group “Food Chemistry, Cosmetics, <strong>and</strong> Tensides” (2000–<br />
2004), Austrian Pharmaceutical Society, Austrian Phytochemical Society, vicehead <strong>of</strong> Austrian<br />
Society <strong>of</strong> Scientifi c Aromatherapy, <strong>and</strong> so on, technical advisor <strong>of</strong> IFEAT (1992–2008), <strong>and</strong> organizer<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 27th ISEO (September 2006, in Vienna) together with Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Dr. Ch. Franz.<br />
Based on the sound interdisciplinary education <strong>of</strong> pharmacists, it was possible to establish almost<br />
completely neglected area <strong>of</strong> fragrance <strong>and</strong> flavor chemistry as a new research discipline within<br />
the pharmaceutical sciences. Our research team is the only one that conducts fragrance research in<br />
its entirety <strong>and</strong> covers synthesis, computer-aided fragrance design, analysis, <strong>and</strong> pharmaceutical/<br />
medicinal aspects. Because <strong>of</strong> our efforts, it is possible to show <strong>and</strong> to prove that these small molecules<br />
possess more properties than merely emitting a good odor. Now, this “Viennese Centre <strong>of</strong><br />
Flavour research” has gained a worldwide scientific reputation documented by more than 400 scientific<br />
publications, about 100 invited lectures, <strong>and</strong> about 200 contributions to symposia, meetings,<br />
<strong>and</strong> congresses, as short lectures <strong>and</strong> poster presentations.
Contributors<br />
Timothy B. Adams<br />
Flavor & Extract Manufacturers Association<br />
Washington, DC<br />
Yoshinori Asakawa<br />
Tokushima Bunri University<br />
Tokushima, Japan<br />
K. Hüsnü Can Başer<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Pharmacognosy<br />
Anadolu University<br />
Eskisehir, Turkey<br />
Hugo Bovill<br />
Treatt PLC<br />
Bury St. Edmunds<br />
Suffolk, United Kingdom<br />
W. S. Brud<br />
Warsaw University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
Pollena-Aroma Ltd<br />
Warsaw, Pol<strong>and</strong><br />
Gerhard Buchbauer<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Clinical Pharmacy <strong>and</strong><br />
Diagnostics<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Vienna<br />
Vienna, Austria<br />
Jan C. R. Demyttenaere<br />
European Flavour <strong>and</strong> Fragrance Association<br />
(EFFA)<br />
Brussels, Belgium<br />
Giovanni Dugo<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Drug-Chemical<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Messina<br />
Messina, Italy<br />
Paola Dugo<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Food <strong>Science</strong> <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Environment<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Messina<br />
Messina, Italy<br />
Elaine Elisabetsky<br />
Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology<br />
The Federal University <strong>of</strong><br />
Rio Gr<strong>and</strong>e do Sul<br />
Porto Alegre, Brazil<br />
Micheli Figueiró<br />
Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology<br />
The Federal University <strong>of</strong><br />
Rio Gr<strong>and</strong>e do Sul<br />
Porto Alegre, Brazil<br />
Chlodwig Franz<br />
Institute for Applied Botany <strong>and</strong><br />
Pharmacognosy<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Medicine Vienna<br />
Vienna, Austria<br />
Bob Harris<br />
SARL <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Consultants<br />
Provence, France<br />
Eva Heuberger<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Clinical Pharmacy <strong>and</strong><br />
Diagnostics<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Vienna<br />
Vienna, Austria<br />
Walter Jäger<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Clinical Pharmacy <strong>and</strong><br />
Diagnostics<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Vienna<br />
Vienna, Austria<br />
xi
xii<br />
Contributors<br />
Jan Karlsen<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Pharmaceutics<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Oslo<br />
Oslo, Norway<br />
Maria M. Kettenring<br />
Neu-Isenburg, Germany<br />
Karl-Heinz Kubeczka<br />
Untere Steigstrasse<br />
Germany<br />
Viviane de Moura Linck<br />
Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology<br />
The Federal University <strong>of</strong> Rio Gr<strong>and</strong>e do Sul<br />
Porto Alegre, Brazil<br />
Maria Lis-Balchin<br />
South Bank University<br />
London, United Kingdom<br />
Luigi Mondello<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Drug-Chemical<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Messina<br />
Messina, Italy<br />
<strong>and</strong><br />
Campus-Biomedical<br />
Rome, Italy<br />
Yoshiaki Noma<br />
Tokushima Bunri University<br />
Tokushima, Japan<br />
Johannes Novak<br />
Institute for Applied Botany <strong>and</strong><br />
Pharmacognosy<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Medicine Vienna<br />
Vienna, Austria<br />
Alex<strong>and</strong>er Pauli<br />
Review<strong>Science</strong><br />
Zirndorf, Germany<br />
Klaus-Dieter Protzen<br />
Paul Kaders GmbH<br />
Hamburg, Germany<br />
Heinz Schilcher<br />
Immenstadt, Allgäu, Germany<br />
Erich Schmidt<br />
Nördlingen, Germany<br />
<strong>and</strong><br />
Kurt Kitzing GmbH<br />
Wallerstein, Germany<br />
Charles Sell<br />
Givaudan UK Ltd.<br />
Ashford, Kent, Engl<strong>and</strong><br />
Adriana Lourenço da Silva<br />
Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Ethnopharmacology<br />
The Federal University <strong>of</strong> Rio Gr<strong>and</strong>e do Sul<br />
Porto Alegre, Brazil<br />
Sean V. Taylor<br />
Flavor & Extract Manufacturers Association<br />
Washington, DC<br />
Lara M. Vucemilovic<br />
Neu-Isenburg, Germany<br />
Barbara d’Acampora Zellner<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Drug-Chemical<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Messina<br />
Messina, Italy<br />
Domingos Sávio Nunes<br />
Departament <strong>of</strong> Chemistry<br />
State University <strong>of</strong> Ponta Grossa<br />
Ponta Grossa, Brazil
1 Introduction<br />
K. Hüsnü Can Başer <strong>and</strong> Gerhard Buchbauer<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils (EOs) are very interesting natural plant products <strong>and</strong> among other qualities they<br />
possess various biological properties. The term “biological” comprises all activities that these mixtures<br />
<strong>of</strong> volatile compounds (mainly mono- <strong>and</strong> sesquiterpenoids, benzenoids, phenylpropanoids,<br />
etc.) exert on humans, animals, <strong>and</strong> other plants. This book intends to make the reader acquainted<br />
with all aspects <strong>of</strong> EOs <strong>and</strong> their constituent aromachemicals ranging from chemistry, pharmaco logy,<br />
biological activity, production, <strong>and</strong> trade to uses, <strong>and</strong> regulatory aspects. After an overview <strong>of</strong> research<br />
<strong>and</strong> development activities on EOs with a historical perspective (Chapter 2), Chapter 3 “Sources <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>” gives an expert insight into vast sources <strong>of</strong> EOs. The chapter also touches upon agronomic<br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> EO-bearing plants. Traditional <strong>and</strong> modern production techniques <strong>of</strong> EOs are illustrated<br />
<strong>and</strong> discussed in Chapter 4. It is followed by two important chapters “Chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong><br />
<strong>Oils</strong>” (Chapter 5) <strong>and</strong> “Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>” (Chapter 6) illustrating chemical diversity <strong>of</strong> EOs,<br />
<strong>and</strong> analytical techniques employed for the analyses <strong>of</strong> these highly complex mixtures <strong>of</strong> volatiles.<br />
They are followed by a cluster <strong>of</strong> articles on the biological properties <strong>of</strong> EOs, starting with “The<br />
Toxicology <strong>and</strong> Safety <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>: A Constituent-Based Approach” (Chapter 7). On account <strong>of</strong><br />
the complexity <strong>of</strong> these natural products, the toxicological or biochemical testing <strong>of</strong> an EO will<br />
always be the sum <strong>of</strong> its constituents which either act in a synergistic or in an antagonistic way with<br />
one another. Therefore, the chemical characterization <strong>of</strong> the EO is very important for the underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
<strong>of</strong> its biological properties. The constituents <strong>of</strong> these natural mixtures upon being absorbed into<br />
the blood stream <strong>of</strong> humans or animals get metabolized <strong>and</strong> eliminated. This metabolic biotransformation<br />
leads mostly in two steps to products <strong>of</strong> high water solubility which enables the organism to<br />
get rid <strong>of</strong> these “xenobiotics” by renal elimination. This mechanism is thoroughly explained in<br />
Chapter 8, “Metabolism <strong>of</strong> Terpenoids in Animal Models <strong>and</strong> Humans.” In Chapter 9, “Biological<br />
Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>,” “uncommon” biological activities <strong>of</strong> EOs are reviewed, such as anticancer<br />
properties, antinociceptive effects, antiviral activities, antiphlogistic properties, penetration<br />
enhancement activities, <strong>and</strong> antioxidative effects. The psychoactive, particularly stimulating, <strong>and</strong><br />
sedative effects <strong>of</strong> fragrances as well as behavioral activities, elucidated, for example, by neurophysiological<br />
methods, are the topics <strong>of</strong> Chapter 10 (“Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in the Central Nervous<br />
Systemd”), Section 10.2. Here, the emphasis is put on the central nervous system <strong>and</strong> on psychopharmacology<br />
whereas Chapter 10, Section 10.1 mainly deals with reactions <strong>of</strong> the autonomic nervous<br />
system upon contact with EOs <strong>and</strong>/or their main constituents. The phytotherapeutic uses <strong>of</strong> EOs is<br />
another overview about scientific papers in peer-reviewed journals over the last 30 years, so to say the<br />
medical use <strong>of</strong> these natural plant products excluding aromatherapeutical treatments <strong>and</strong> single case<br />
studies (Chapter 11, “Phytotherapeutic Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>”). Another contribution only deals with<br />
antimicrobial activities <strong>of</strong> those EOs that are monographed in the European Pharmacopoeia. In<br />
Chapter 12, “In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> Monographed in the European<br />
Pharmacopoeia 6th Edition,” more than 81 tables show the importance <strong>of</strong> these valuable properties<br />
1
2 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> EOs. Aromatherapy with EOs covers the other side <strong>of</strong> the “classical” medical uses. “Aromatherapy<br />
with <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>” (Chapter 13), is written by Maria Lis-Balchin, a known expert in this field <strong>and</strong><br />
far from esoteric quackery. It completes the series <strong>of</strong> contributions dealing with the biological properties<br />
<strong>of</strong> EO regarded from various sides <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>points.<br />
Chapters 14 <strong>and</strong> 15 by the world-renown experts Y. Asakawa <strong>and</strong> Y. Noma are concise treatises<br />
on the biotransformations <strong>of</strong> EO constituents. Enzymes in microorganisms <strong>and</strong> tissues metabolize<br />
EO constituents in similar ways by adding mainly oxygen function to molecules to render them<br />
water soluble to facilitate their metabolism. This is also seen as a means <strong>of</strong> detoxification for these<br />
organisms. Many interesting <strong>and</strong> valuable novel chemicals are biosynthesized by this way. These<br />
products are also considered as natural since the substrates are natural.<br />
Encapsulation is a technique widely utilized in pharmaceutical, chemical, food, <strong>and</strong> feed<br />
industries to render EOs more manageable in formulations. Classical <strong>and</strong> modern encapsulation<br />
techniques are explained in detail in Chapter 17, “Encapsulation <strong>and</strong> Other Programmed Release<br />
techniques for EOs <strong>and</strong> Volatile Terpenes.”<br />
EOs <strong>and</strong> aromachemicals are low-volume high-value products used in perfumery, cosmetics,<br />
feed, food, beverages, <strong>and</strong> pharmaceutical industries. Industrial uses <strong>of</strong> EOs are covered in an informative<br />
chapter from a historical perspective.<br />
“Aroma-Vital Cuisine” (Chapter 18) looks at the possibility to utilize EOs in the kitchen, where<br />
the pleasure <strong>of</strong> eating, the sensuality, <strong>and</strong> the enjoyment <strong>of</strong> lunching <strong>and</strong> dining <strong>of</strong> mostly processed<br />
food are stressed. Here, rather the holistic point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>and</strong> not too scientific way <strong>of</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
EOs is the topic, simply to show that these volatile natural plant products can add a lot <strong>of</strong> wellfeeling<br />
to their users.<br />
EOs are not only appealing to humans but also to animals. <strong>Applications</strong> <strong>of</strong> EOs as feed additives<br />
<strong>and</strong> for treating diseases in pets <strong>and</strong> farm animals are illustrated in Chapter 19, “<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> Used<br />
in Veterinary Medicine,” that comprises a rare collection <strong>of</strong> information in this subject.<br />
The EO industry is highly complex <strong>and</strong> fragmented <strong>and</strong> the trade <strong>of</strong> EOs is rather conservative<br />
<strong>and</strong> highly specialized. EOs are produced <strong>and</strong> utilized in industrialized as well as in developing<br />
countries worldwide. Their trade situation in the world is summarized in “Trade <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>”<br />
(Chapter 20), authored by a world-renown expert Hugo Bovill.<br />
Storage <strong>and</strong> transport <strong>of</strong> EOs are crucial issues since they are highly sensitive to heat, moisture,<br />
<strong>and</strong> oxygen. Therefore, special precautions <strong>and</strong> strict regulations apply for their h<strong>and</strong>ling in storage<br />
<strong>and</strong> transport. “Storage <strong>and</strong> Transport <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>” (Chapter 21) will give the reader necessary<br />
guidelines to tackle this problem.<br />
Finally, the regulatory affairs <strong>of</strong> EOs are dealt with in Chapter 22 in order to give a better insight<br />
to those interested in legislative aspects. “Recent EU Legislation on Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances <strong>and</strong> Its<br />
Impact on <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>” comprises the most up-to-date regulations <strong>and</strong> legislative procedures<br />
applied on EOs in the European Union.<br />
This book is hoped to satisfy the needs <strong>of</strong> EO producers, traders, <strong>and</strong> users as well as researchers,<br />
academicians, <strong>and</strong> legislators who will find the most current information given by selected experts<br />
under one cover.
2<br />
History <strong>and</strong> Sources <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research<br />
Karl-Heinz Kubeczka<br />
CONTENTS<br />
2.1 First Systematic Investigations ............................................................................................ 3<br />
2.2 Research during the Last Half Century .............................................................................. 5<br />
2.2.1 <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Preparation Techniques ...................................................................... 5<br />
2.2.1.1 Industrial Processes .................................................................................. 5<br />
2.2.1.2 Laboratory-Scale Techniques ................................................................... 5<br />
2.2.1.3 Microsampling Techniques ...................................................................... 6<br />
2.2.2 Chromatographic Separation Techniques ............................................................... 11<br />
2.2.2.1 Thin-Layer Chromatography ................................................................... 12<br />
2.2.2.2 Gas Chromatography ............................................................................... 12<br />
2.2.2.3 Liquid Column Chromatography ............................................................. 18<br />
2.2.2.4 Supercritical Fluid Chromatography ........................................................ 20<br />
2.2.2.5 Countercurrent Chromatography ............................................................. 20<br />
2.2.3 Hyphenated Techniques ........................................................................................... 21<br />
2.2.3.1 Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry ............................................... 21<br />
2.2.3.2 High-Resolution Gas Chromatography-Fourier Transform<br />
Infrared Spectroscopy .............................................................................. 23<br />
2.2.3.3 Gas Chromatography-Ultraviolet Spectroscopy ...................................... 23<br />
2.2.3.4 Gas Chromatography-Atomic Emission Spectroscopy ............................ 24<br />
2.2.3.5 Gas Chromatography-Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry ......................... 24<br />
2.2.3.6 High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Gas Chromatography ............ 24<br />
2.2.3.7 HPLC-MS, HPLC-NMR Spectroscopy ................................................... 26<br />
2.2.3.8 Supercritical Fluid Extraction-Gas Chromatography .............................. 26<br />
2.2.3.9 Supercritical Fluid Chromatography-Gas Chromatography .................... 26<br />
2.2.3.10 Couplings <strong>of</strong> SFC-MS <strong>and</strong> SFC-FTIR Spectroscopy .............................. 27<br />
2.2.4 Identification <strong>of</strong> Multicomponent Samples without Previous Separation ............... 27<br />
2.2.4.1 UV Spectroscopy ..................................................................................... 27<br />
2.2.4.2 IR Spectroscopy ....................................................................................... 28<br />
2.2.4.3 Mass Spectrometry ................................................................................... 28<br />
2.2.4.4<br />
13<br />
C-NMR Spectroscopy ............................................................................ 28<br />
References .................................................................................................................................... 30<br />
2.1 FIRST SYSTEMATIC INVESTIGATIONS<br />
The first systematic investigations <strong>of</strong> constituents from essential oils may be attributed to the French<br />
chemist M. J. Dumas (1800–1884) who analyzed some hydrocarbons <strong>and</strong> oxygen as well as sulfur<strong>and</strong><br />
nitrogen-containing constituents. He published his results in 1833. The French researcher<br />
3
4 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
M. Berthelot (1859) characterized several natural substances <strong>and</strong> their rearrangement products by<br />
optical rotation. However, the most important investigations have been performed by O. Wallach, an<br />
assistant <strong>of</strong> Kekule. He realized that several terpenes described under different names according to<br />
their botanical sources were <strong>of</strong>ten, in fact, chemically identical. He, therefore, tried to isolate the<br />
individual oil constituents <strong>and</strong> to study their basic properties. He employed together with his highly<br />
qualified coworkers Hesse, Gildemeister, Betram, Walbaum, Wienhaus, <strong>and</strong> others fractional distillation<br />
to separate essential oils <strong>and</strong> performed reactions with inorganic reagents to characterize the<br />
obtained individual fractions. The reagents he used were hydrochloric acid, oxides <strong>of</strong> nitrogen,<br />
bromine, <strong>and</strong> nitrosyl chloride—which was used for the first time by W. A. Tilden (1875)—by<br />
which frequently crystalline products have been obtained.<br />
At that time, hydrocarbons occurring in essential oils with the molecular formula C 10 H 16 were<br />
known, which had been named by Kekule terpenes because <strong>of</strong> their occurrence in turpentine oil.<br />
Constituents with the molecular formulas C 10 H 16 O <strong>and</strong> C 10 H 18 O were also known at that time under<br />
the generic name camphor <strong>and</strong> were obviously related to terpenes. The prototype <strong>of</strong> this group was<br />
camphor itself, which was known since antiquity. In 1891, Wallach characterized the terpenes<br />
pinene, camphene, limonene, dipentene, phell<strong>and</strong>rene, terpinolene, fenchene, <strong>and</strong> sylvestrene, which<br />
has later been recognized to be an artifact.<br />
During 1884–1914, Wallach wrote about 180 articles that are summarized in his book Terpene<br />
und Campher (Wallach, 1914) compiling all the knowledge on terpenes at that time <strong>and</strong> already in<br />
1887 he suggested that the terpenes must be constructed from isoprene units. In 1910, he was honored<br />
with the Nobel Prize for Chemistry “in recognition <strong>of</strong> his outst<strong>and</strong>ing research in organic<br />
chemistry <strong>and</strong> especially in the field <strong>of</strong> alicyclic compounds.”<br />
In addition to Wallach, the German chemist A. von Baeyer, who also had been trained in Kekule’s<br />
laboratory, was one <strong>of</strong> the first chemists to become convinced <strong>of</strong> the achievements <strong>of</strong> structural<br />
chemistry <strong>and</strong> who developed <strong>and</strong> applied it to all <strong>of</strong> his work covering a broad scope <strong>of</strong> organic<br />
chemistry. Since 1893, he devoted considerable work to the structures <strong>and</strong> properties <strong>of</strong> cyclic<br />
terpenes (von Bayer, 1901). Besides his contributions to several dyes, the investigations <strong>of</strong> polyacetylenes,<br />
<strong>and</strong> so on, his contributions to theoretical chemistry including the strain theory <strong>of</strong> triple<br />
bonds <strong>and</strong> small carbon cycles have to be mentioned. In 1905, he was awarded the Nobel Prize for<br />
Chemistry “in recognition <strong>of</strong> his contributions to the development <strong>of</strong> Organic Chemistry <strong>and</strong><br />
Industrial Chemistry, by his work on organic dyes <strong>and</strong> hydroaromatic compounds.” The frequently<br />
occurring acyclic monoterpenes geraniol, linalool, citral, <strong>and</strong> so on have been investigated by<br />
F. W. Semmler <strong>and</strong> the Russian chemist G. Wagner (1899), who recognized the importance <strong>of</strong> rearrangements<br />
for the elucidation <strong>of</strong> chemical constitution, especially the carbon-to-carbon migration<br />
<strong>of</strong> alkyl, aryl, or hydride ions, a type <strong>of</strong> reaction that was later generalized by H. Meerwein (1914) as<br />
Wagner–Meerwein rearrangement.<br />
More recent investigations <strong>of</strong> J. Read, W. Hückel, H. Schmidt, W. Treibs, <strong>and</strong> V. Prelog were<br />
mainly devoted to disentangle the stereochemical structures <strong>of</strong> menthols, carvomenthols, borneols,<br />
fenchols, <strong>and</strong> pinocampheols, as well as the related ketones (cf. Gildemeister <strong>and</strong> H<strong>of</strong>fmann, 1956).<br />
A significant improvement in structure elucidation was the application <strong>of</strong> dehydrogenation <strong>of</strong><br />
sesqui- <strong>and</strong> diterpenes with sulfur <strong>and</strong> later with selenium to give aromatic compounds as a major<br />
method, <strong>and</strong> the application <strong>of</strong> the isoprene rule to terpene chemistry, which have been very efficiently<br />
used by L. Ruzicka (1953) in Zurich, Switzerl<strong>and</strong>. In 1939, he was honored in recognition<br />
<strong>of</strong> his outst<strong>and</strong>ing investigations with the Nobel Prize in chemistry for his work on “polymethylenes<br />
<strong>and</strong> higher terpenes.”<br />
The structure <strong>of</strong> the frequently occurring bicyclic sesquiterpene ß-caryophyllene was for many<br />
years a matter <strong>of</strong> doubt. After numerous investigations W. Treibs (1952) has been able to isolate the<br />
crystalline caryophyllene epoxide from the autoxidation products <strong>of</strong> clove oil <strong>and</strong> F. Šorm et al.<br />
(1950) suggested caryophyllene to have a 4- <strong>and</strong> 9-membered ring on bases <strong>of</strong> infrared (IR) investigations.<br />
This suggestion was later confirmed by the English chemist D. H. R. Barton (Barton <strong>and</strong><br />
Lindsay, 1951), who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1969.
History <strong>and</strong> Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research 5<br />
The application <strong>of</strong> ultraviolet (UV) spectroscopy in the elucidation <strong>of</strong> the structure <strong>of</strong> terpenes<br />
<strong>and</strong> other natural products was extensively used by R. B. Woodward in the early forties <strong>of</strong> the last<br />
century. On the basis <strong>of</strong> his large collection <strong>of</strong> empirical data, he developed a series <strong>of</strong> rules (later<br />
called the Woodward rules), which could be applied to finding out the structures <strong>of</strong> new natural<br />
substances by correlations between the position <strong>of</strong> UV maximum absorption <strong>and</strong> the substitution<br />
pattern <strong>of</strong> a diene or an a,b-unsaturated ketone (Woodward, 1941). He was awarded the Nobel Prize<br />
in Chemistry in 1965. However, it was not until the introduction <strong>of</strong> chromatographic separation<br />
methods <strong>and</strong> nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy into organic chemistry, that a lot <strong>of</strong><br />
further structures <strong>of</strong> terpenes were elucidated. The almost exponential growth in our knowledge in<br />
that field <strong>and</strong> other essential oil constituents is essentially due to the considerable advances in<br />
analytical methods in the course <strong>of</strong> the last half century.<br />
2.2 RESEARCH DURING THE LAST HALF CENTURY<br />
2.2.1 ESSENTIAL OIL PREPARATION TECHNIQUES<br />
2.2.1.1 Industrial Processes<br />
The vast majority <strong>of</strong> essential oils are produced from plant material in which they occur by different<br />
kinds <strong>of</strong> distillation or by cold pressing in the case <strong>of</strong> the peel oils from citrus fruits.<br />
In water- or hydrodistillation, the chopped plant material is submerged <strong>and</strong> in direct contact with<br />
boiling water. In steam distillation, the steam is produced in a boiler separate <strong>of</strong> the still <strong>and</strong> blown<br />
through a pipe into the bottom <strong>of</strong> the still, where the plant material rests on a perforated tray or in a<br />
basket for quick removal after exhaustive extraction. In addition to the aforementioned distillation at<br />
atmospheric pressure, high-pressure steam distillation is most <strong>of</strong>ten applied in European <strong>and</strong><br />
American field stills <strong>and</strong> the applied increased temperature significantly reduces the time <strong>of</strong> distillation.<br />
The high-pressure steam-type distillation is <strong>of</strong>ten applied for peppermint, spearmint, lav<strong>and</strong>in,<br />
<strong>and</strong> the like. The condensed distillate, consisting <strong>of</strong> a mixture <strong>of</strong> water <strong>and</strong> oil, is usually separated<br />
in a so-called Florentine flask, a glass jar, or more recently in a receptacle made <strong>of</strong> stainless steel<br />
with one outlet near the base <strong>and</strong> another near the top. There the distillate separates into two layers<br />
from which the oil <strong>and</strong> the water can be separately withdrawn. Generally, the process <strong>of</strong> steam distillation<br />
is the most widely accepted method for the production <strong>of</strong> essential oils on a large scale.<br />
Expression or cold pressing is a process in which the oil gl<strong>and</strong>s within the peels <strong>of</strong> citrus fruits<br />
are mechanically crushed to release their content. There are several different processes used for the<br />
isolation <strong>of</strong> citrus oils; however, there are four major currently used processes. Those are Pellatrice<br />
<strong>and</strong> Sfumatrice—most <strong>of</strong>ten used in Italy—<strong>and</strong> the Brown Peel Shaver as well as the FMC extractor,<br />
which are used predominantly in North <strong>and</strong> South America. For more details see for example<br />
Lawrence 1995. All these processes lead to products that are not entirely volatile because they may<br />
contain coumarins, plant pigments, <strong>and</strong> so on; however, they are nevertheless acknowledged as<br />
essential oils by the International Organization for St<strong>and</strong>ardization (ISO), the different pharmacopoeias,<br />
<strong>and</strong> so on.<br />
In contrast, extracts obtained by solvent extraction with different organic solvents, with liquid<br />
carbon dioxide or by supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) may not be considered as true essential oils;<br />
however, they possess most <strong>of</strong>ten aroma pr<strong>of</strong>iles that are almost identical to the raw material from<br />
which they have been extracted. They are therefore <strong>of</strong>ten used in the flavor <strong>and</strong> fragrance industry<br />
<strong>and</strong> in addition in food industry, if the chosen solvents are acceptable for food <strong>and</strong> do not leave any<br />
harmful residue in food products.<br />
2.2.1.2 Laboratory-Scale Techniques<br />
The following techniques are used mainly for trapping small amounts <strong>of</strong> volatiles from aromatic<br />
plants in research laboratories <strong>and</strong> partly for determination <strong>of</strong> the essential oil content in plant<br />
material. The most <strong>of</strong>ten used device is the circulatory distillation apparatus, basing on the
6 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
publication <strong>of</strong> Clevenger in 1928 <strong>and</strong> which has later found various modifications. One <strong>of</strong> those<br />
modified apparatus described by Cocking <strong>and</strong> Middleton (1935) has been introduced in the<br />
European Pharmacopoeia <strong>and</strong> several other pharmacopoeias. This device consists <strong>of</strong> a heated<br />
round-bottom flask into which the chopped plant material <strong>and</strong> water are placed <strong>and</strong> which is connected<br />
to a vertical condenser <strong>and</strong> a graduated tube, for the volumetric determination <strong>of</strong> the oil.<br />
At the bottom <strong>of</strong> the tube a three-way valve permits to direct the water back to the flask, since it<br />
is a continuous closed-circuit distillation device, <strong>and</strong> at the end <strong>of</strong> the distillation process to separate<br />
the essential oil from the water phase for further investigations. The length <strong>of</strong> distillation<br />
depends on the plant material to be investigated; however, it is usually fixed to 3–4 h. For the<br />
volumetric determination <strong>of</strong> the essential oil content in plants according to most <strong>of</strong> the pharmacopoeias,<br />
a certain amount <strong>of</strong> xylene—usually 0.5 mL—has to be placed over the water before<br />
running distillation to separate even small droplets <strong>of</strong> essential oil during distillation from the<br />
water. The volume <strong>of</strong> essential oil can be determined in the graduated tube after subtracting the<br />
volume <strong>of</strong> the applied xylene.<br />
Improved constructions with regard to the cooling system <strong>of</strong> the above-mentioned distillation<br />
apparatus have been published by Stahl (1953) <strong>and</strong> Sprecher (1963), <strong>and</strong> in publications <strong>of</strong> Kaiser<br />
et al. (1951) <strong>and</strong> Mechler et al. (1977), various apparatus used for the determination <strong>of</strong> essential oils<br />
in plant material are discussed <strong>and</strong> depicted.<br />
A further improvement was the development <strong>of</strong> a simultaneous distillation–solvent extraction<br />
device by Likens <strong>and</strong> Nickerson in 1964 (cf. Nickerson <strong>and</strong> Likens, 1966). The device permits continuous<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> volatiles during hydrodistillation in one step using a closed-circuit distillation<br />
system. The water distillate is continuously extracted with a small amount <strong>of</strong> an organic <strong>and</strong><br />
water-immiscible solvent. Although there are two versions described, one for high-density <strong>and</strong> one<br />
for low-density solvents, the high-density solvent version using dichloromethane is mostly applied<br />
in essential oil research. It has found numerous applications <strong>and</strong> several modified versions including<br />
different microdistillation devices have been described (e.g., Bicchi, 1987; Chaintreau, 2001).<br />
A sample preparation technique basing on Soxhlet extraction in a pressurized container using<br />
liquid carbon dioxide as extractant has been published by Jennings (1979). This device produces<br />
solvent-free extracts especially suitable for high-resolution gas chromatography (HRGC). As a less<br />
time-consuming alternative, the application <strong>of</strong> microwave-assisted extraction has been proposed by<br />
several researchers, for example by Craveiro et al. (1989), using a round-bottom flask containing the<br />
fresh plant material. This flask was placed into a microwave oven <strong>and</strong> passed by a flow <strong>of</strong> air. The<br />
oven was heated for 5 min <strong>and</strong> the obtained mixture <strong>of</strong> water <strong>and</strong> oil collected in a small <strong>and</strong> cooled<br />
flask. After extraction with dichloromethane the solution was submitted to gas chromatographymass<br />
spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. The obtained analytical results have been compared with the<br />
results obtained by conventional distillation <strong>and</strong> exhibited no qualitative differences; however, the<br />
percentages <strong>of</strong> the individual components varied significantly. A different approach yielding<br />
solvent-free extracts from aromatic herbs by means <strong>of</strong> microwave heating has been presented by<br />
Lucchesi et al. (2004). The potential <strong>of</strong> the applied technique has been compared with conventional<br />
hydrodistillation showing substantially higher amounts <strong>of</strong> oxygenated compounds at the expense <strong>of</strong><br />
monoterpene hydrocarbons.<br />
2.2.1.3 Microsampling Techniques<br />
2.2.1.3.1 Microdistillation<br />
Preparation <strong>of</strong> very small amounts <strong>of</strong> essential oils may be necessary if only very small amounts <strong>of</strong><br />
plant material are available, <strong>and</strong> can be fundamental in chemotaxonomic investigations <strong>and</strong> control<br />
analysis but also for medicinal <strong>and</strong> spice plant breeding. In the past, numerous attempts have been<br />
made to minimize conventional distillation devices. As an example, the modified Marcusson device<br />
may be quoted (Bicchi et al., 1983) by which 0.2–3 g plant material suspended in 50 mL water can<br />
be distilled <strong>and</strong> collected in 100 μL analytical grade pentane or hexane. The analytical results<br />
proved to be identical with those obtained by conventional distillation.
History <strong>and</strong> Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research 7<br />
Microversions <strong>of</strong> the distillation–extraction apparatus, described by Likens <strong>and</strong> Nickerson, have<br />
also been developed as well for high-density solvents (Godefroot et al., 1981), as for low-density<br />
solvents (Godefroot et al., 1982). The main advantage <strong>of</strong> these techniques is that no further enrichment<br />
by evaporation is required for subsequent gas chromatographic investigation.<br />
A different approach has been presented by Gießelmann et al. (1993) <strong>and</strong> Kubeczka et al. (1995).<br />
By means <strong>of</strong> a new developed microhydrodistillation device the volatile constituents <strong>of</strong> very small<br />
amounts <strong>of</strong> plant material have been separated. The microscale hydrodistillation <strong>of</strong> the sample is<br />
performed using a 20 mL crimp-cap glass vial with a Teflon ® -lined rubber septum contaning 10 mL<br />
water <strong>and</strong> 200–250 mg <strong>of</strong> the material to be investigated. This vial, which is placed in a heating<br />
block, is connected with a cooled receiver vial by a 0.32 mm I.D. fused silica capillary. By temperature-programmed<br />
heating <strong>of</strong> the sample vial, the water <strong>and</strong> the volatile constituents are vaporized<br />
<strong>and</strong> passed through the capillary into the cooled receiver vial. There, the volatiles as well as water<br />
are condensed <strong>and</strong> the essential oil collected in pentane for further analysis. The received analytical<br />
results have been compared to results from identical samples obtained by conventional hydrodistillation<br />
showing a good correlation <strong>of</strong> the qualitative <strong>and</strong> quantitative composition. Further applications<br />
with the commercially available Eppendorf MicroDistiller ® have been published in several<br />
papers, for example, by Briechle et al. (1997) <strong>and</strong> Baser et al. (2001).<br />
A simple device for rapid extraction <strong>of</strong> volatiles from natural plant drugs <strong>and</strong> the direct transfer<br />
<strong>of</strong> these substances to the starting point <strong>of</strong> a thin-layer chromatographic plate has been described by<br />
Stahl (1969a) <strong>and</strong> in his subsequent publications. A small amount <strong>of</strong> the sample (ca. 100 mg) is<br />
introduced into a glass cartridge with a conical tip together with 100 mg silica gel, containing 20%<br />
<strong>of</strong> water, <strong>and</strong> heated rapidly in a heating block for a short time at a preset temperature. The tip <strong>of</strong> the<br />
glass tube projects ca. 1 mm from the furnace <strong>and</strong> points to the starting point <strong>of</strong> the thin-layer plate,<br />
which is positioned 1 mm in front <strong>of</strong> the tip. Before introducing the glass tube it is sealed with a silicone<br />
rubber membrane. This simple technique has proven useful for many years in numerous investigations,<br />
especially in quality control, identification <strong>of</strong> plant drugs, <strong>and</strong> rapid screening <strong>of</strong> chemical<br />
races. In addition to the aforementioned microhydrodistillaion with the so-called TAS procedure<br />
(T = thermomicro <strong>and</strong> transfer; A = application; S = substance), several further applications, for<br />
example, in structure elucidation <strong>of</strong> isolated natural compounds such as zinc dust distillation, sulfur<br />
<strong>and</strong> selenium dehydrogenation, <strong>and</strong> catalytic dehydrogenation with palladium have been described<br />
in the microgram range (Stahl, 1976).<br />
2.2.1.3.2 Direct Sampling from Secretory Structures<br />
The investigation <strong>of</strong> the essential oils by direct sampling from secretory gl<strong>and</strong>s is <strong>of</strong> fundamental<br />
importance in studying the true essential oil composition <strong>of</strong> aromatic plants, since the usual applied<br />
techniques such as hydrodistillation <strong>and</strong> extraction are known to produce in some cases several<br />
artifacts. Therefore only direct sampling from secretory cavities <strong>and</strong> gl<strong>and</strong>ular trichomes <strong>and</strong><br />
poperly performed successive analysis may furnish reliable results. One <strong>of</strong> the first investigations<br />
with a kind <strong>of</strong> direct sampling has been performed by Hefendehl (1966), who isolated the gl<strong>and</strong>ular<br />
hairs from the surfaces <strong>of</strong> Mentha piperita <strong>and</strong> Mentha aquatica leaves by means <strong>of</strong> a thin film <strong>of</strong><br />
polyvinyl alcohol, which was removed after drying <strong>and</strong> extracted with diethyl ether. The composition<br />
<strong>of</strong> this product was in good agreement with the essential oils obtained by hydrodistillation. In<br />
contrast to these results, Malingré et al. (1969) observed some qualitative differences in course <strong>of</strong><br />
their study on Mentha aquatica leaves after isolation <strong>of</strong> the essential oil from individual gl<strong>and</strong>ular<br />
hairs by means <strong>of</strong> a micromanipulator <strong>and</strong> a stereomicroscope. In the same year Amelunxen et al.<br />
(1969) published results on Mentha piperita, who separately isolated gl<strong>and</strong>ular hairs <strong>and</strong> gl<strong>and</strong>ular<br />
trichomes with glass capillaries. They found identical qualitative composition <strong>of</strong> the oil in both<br />
types <strong>of</strong> hairs, but differing concentrations <strong>of</strong> the individual components. Further studies have been<br />
performed by Henderson et al. (1970) on Pogostemon cablin leaves <strong>and</strong> by Fischer et al. (1987) on<br />
Majorana hortensis leaves. In the latter study, significant differences regarding the oil composition<br />
<strong>of</strong> the hydrodistilled oil <strong>and</strong> the oil extracted by means <strong>of</strong> glass capillaries from the trichomes
8 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
was observed. Their final conclusion was that the analysis <strong>of</strong> the respective essential oil is mainly<br />
an analysis <strong>of</strong> artifacts, formed during distillation, <strong>and</strong> the gas chromatographic analysis. Even if<br />
the investgations are performed very carefully <strong>and</strong> the successive GC has been performed by cold<br />
on-column injection to avoid thermal stress in the injection port, significant differences <strong>of</strong> the GC<br />
pattern <strong>of</strong> directly sampled oils versus the microdistilled samples have been observed in several<br />
cases (Bicchi et al., 1985).<br />
2.2.1.3.3 Headspace Techniques<br />
Headspace (HS) analysis has become one <strong>of</strong> the very frequently used sampling techniques in the<br />
investigation <strong>of</strong> aromatic plants, fragrances, <strong>and</strong> spices. It is a means <strong>of</strong> separating the volatiles from<br />
a liquid or solid prior to gas chromatographic analysis <strong>and</strong> is preferably used for samples that cannot<br />
be directly injected into a gas chromatograph. The applied techniques are usually classified according<br />
to the different sampling principles in static HS analysis <strong>and</strong> dynamic HS analysis.<br />
2.2.1.3.3.1 Static HS Methods In static HS analysis, the liquid or solid sample is placed into<br />
a vial, which is heated to a predetermined temperature after sealing. After the sample has reached<br />
equilibrium with its vapor (in equilibrium, the distribution <strong>of</strong> the analytes between the two phases<br />
depends on their partition coefficients at the preselected temperature, the time, <strong>and</strong> the pressure), an<br />
aliquot <strong>of</strong> the vapor phase can be withdrawn with a gas-tight syringe <strong>and</strong> subjected to gas chromatographic<br />
analysis. A simple method for the HS investigation <strong>of</strong> herbs <strong>and</strong> spices was described by<br />
Chialva et al. (1982), using a blender equipped with a special gas-tight valve. After grinding the herb<br />
<strong>and</strong> until thermodynamic equilibrium is reached, the HS sample can be withdrawn through the<br />
valve <strong>and</strong> injected into a gas chromatograph. Eight <strong>of</strong> the obtained capillary gas chromatograms are<br />
depicted in the paper <strong>of</strong> Chialva <strong>and</strong> compared with those <strong>of</strong> the respective essential oils exhibiting<br />
significant higher amounts <strong>of</strong> the more volatile oil constituents. However, one <strong>of</strong> the major problems<br />
with static HS analyses is the need for sample enrichment with regard to trace components. Therefore<br />
a concentration step such as cryogenic trapping, liquid absorption, or adsorption on a suitable solid<br />
has to be inserted for volatiles occurring only in small amounts. A versatile <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten-used technique<br />
in the last decade is solid-phase microextraction (SPME) for sampling volatiles, which will be discussed<br />
in more detail in a separate paragraph. Since different other trapping procedures are a fundamental<br />
prerequisite for dynamic HS methods, they will be considered below. A comprehensive<br />
treatment <strong>of</strong> the theoretical basis <strong>of</strong> static HS analysis including numerous applications has been published<br />
by Kolb et al. (1997, 2006).<br />
2.2.1.3.3.2 Dynamic HS Methods The sensitivity <strong>of</strong> HS analysis can be improved considerably<br />
by stripping the volatiles from the material to be investigated with a stream <strong>of</strong> purified air or inert<br />
gas <strong>and</strong> trapping the released compounds. However, care has to be taken if grinded plant material<br />
has to be investigated, since disruption <strong>of</strong> tissues may initiate enzymatic reactions that may lead to<br />
formation <strong>of</strong> volatile artifacts. After stripping the plant material with gas in a closed vessel, the<br />
released volatile compounds are passed through a trap to collect <strong>and</strong> enrich the sample. This must<br />
be done because sample injection <strong>of</strong> fairly large sample volumes results in b<strong>and</strong> broadening causing<br />
peak distortion <strong>and</strong> poor resolution. The following three techniques are advisable for collecting the<br />
highly diluted volatile sample according to Schaefer (1981) <strong>and</strong> Schreier (1984) with numerous<br />
references.<br />
Cryogenic trapping can be achieved by passing the gas containing the stripped volatiles through<br />
a cooled vessel or a capillary in which the volatile compounds are condensed (Kolb et al., 1986).<br />
The most convenient way for trapping the volatiles is to utilize part <strong>of</strong> the capillary column as a<br />
cryogenic trap. A simple device for cry<strong>of</strong>ocusing <strong>of</strong> HS volatiles by using the first part <strong>of</strong> capillary<br />
column as a cryogenic trap has been shown in the aforementioned reference inclusive <strong>of</strong> a discussion<br />
<strong>of</strong> the theoretical background <strong>of</strong> cryogenic trapping. A similar on-column cold trapping device, suitable<br />
for extended period vapor sampling, has been published by Jennings (1981).
History <strong>and</strong> Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research 9<br />
A different approach can be used if large volumes <strong>of</strong> stripped volatiles have to be trapped using<br />
collection in organic liquid phases. In this case, the volatiles distribute between the gas <strong>and</strong> the liquid<br />
<strong>and</strong> efficient collection will be achieved, if the distribution factor K is favorable for solving the<br />
stripped compounds in the liquid. A serious drawback, however, is the necessity to concentrate the<br />
obtained solution prior to GC with the risk to loose highly volatile compounds. This can be overcome<br />
if a short-packed GC column is used containing a solid support coated with a suitable liquid.<br />
Novak et al. (1965) have used Celite coated with 30% silicone elastomer E-301 <strong>and</strong> the absorbed<br />
compounds were introduced into a gas chromatograph after thermal desorption. Coating with 15%<br />
silicone rubber SE 30 has been successfully used by Kubeczka (1967) with a similar device <strong>and</strong> the<br />
application <strong>of</strong> a wall-coated tubing with methylsilicone oil SF 96 has been described by Teranishi<br />
et al. (1972). A different technique has been used by Bergström et al. (1973, 1980). They trapped the<br />
scent <strong>of</strong> flowers on Chromosorb ® W coated with 10% silicon high vacuum grease <strong>and</strong> filled a small<br />
portion <strong>of</strong> the sorbent containing the volatiles into a precolumn, which was placed in the splitless<br />
injection port <strong>of</strong> a gas chromatograph. There the volatiles were desorbed under heating <strong>and</strong> flushed<br />
onto the GC column. In 1987, Bichi et al. applied up to 50 cm pieces <strong>of</strong> thick-film fused silica<br />
capillaries coated with a 15 μm dimethylsilicone film for trapping the volatiles in the atmosphere<br />
surrounding living plants. The plants under investigation were placed in a glass bell into which the<br />
trapping capillary was introduced through a rubber septum while the other end <strong>of</strong> the capillary has<br />
been connected to pocket sampler. In order to trap even volatile monoterpene hydrocarbons, a capillary<br />
length <strong>of</strong> at least 50 cm <strong>and</strong> sample volume <strong>of</strong> maximum 100 mL has to be applied to avoid loss<br />
<strong>of</strong> components through breakthrough. The trapped compounds have been subsequently on-line<br />
thermally desorbed, cold trapped, <strong>and</strong> analyzed. Finally, a type <strong>of</strong> enfl eurage <strong>and</strong> especially designed<br />
for field experiments has been described by Joulain (1987) to trap the scents <strong>of</strong> freshly picked flowers.<br />
Around 100 g flowers were spread on the grid <strong>of</strong> a specially designed stainless steel device <strong>and</strong><br />
passed by a stream <strong>of</strong> ambient air, supplied by an unheated portable air drier. The stripped volatiles<br />
are trapped on a layer <strong>of</strong> purified fat placed above the grid. After 2 h, the fat was collected <strong>and</strong> the<br />
volatiles recovered in the laboratory by means <strong>of</strong> vacuum distillation at low temperature.<br />
With a third <strong>of</strong>ten applied procedure the stripped volatiles from the HS <strong>of</strong> plant material <strong>and</strong><br />
especially from flowers are passed through a tube filled with a solid adsorbent on which the volatile<br />
compounds are adsorbed. Common adsorbents most <strong>of</strong>ten used in investigations <strong>of</strong> plant volatiles<br />
are above all charcoal <strong>and</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> synthetic porous polymers. Activated charcoal is an<br />
adsorbent with a high adsorption capacity, thermal <strong>and</strong> chemical stability, <strong>and</strong> which is not deactivated<br />
by water, an important feature, if freshly collected plant material has to be investigated. The<br />
adsorbed volatiles can easily be recovered by elution with small amounts (10–50 μL) <strong>of</strong> carbon<br />
disulfide avoiding further concentration <strong>of</strong> the sample prior to GC analysis. The occasionally<br />
observed incomplete recovery <strong>of</strong> sample components after solvent extraction <strong>and</strong> artifact formation<br />
after thermal desorption have been largely solved by application <strong>of</strong> small amounts <strong>of</strong> special type <strong>of</strong><br />
activated charcoal as described by Grob et al. (1976). Numerous applications have been described<br />
using this special type <strong>of</strong> activated charcoal, for example, by Kaiser (1993) in a great number <strong>of</strong> field<br />
experiments on the scent <strong>of</strong> orchids. In addition to charcoal the following synthetic porous polymers<br />
have been applied to collect volatile compounds from the HS from flowers <strong>and</strong> different other plant<br />
materials according to Schaefer (1981): Tenax ® GC, different Porapak ® types (e.g., Porapak ® P, Q,<br />
R, <strong>and</strong> T) as well as several Chromosorb ® types belonging to the 100 series. More recent developed<br />
adsorbents are the carbonaceous adsorbents such as Ambersorb ® , Carboxene ® , <strong>and</strong> Carbopak ® <strong>and</strong><br />
their adsorbent properties lie between activated charcoal <strong>and</strong> the porous polymers. Especially the<br />
porous polymers have to be washed repeatedly, for example, with diethyl ether <strong>and</strong> conditioned<br />
before use in a stream <strong>of</strong> oxygen-free nitrogen at 200–280°C, depending on the sort <strong>of</strong> adsorbent.<br />
The trapped components can be recovered either by thermal desorption or by solvent elution <strong>and</strong> the<br />
recoveries can be different depending on the applied adsorbent (Cole, 1980). Another very important<br />
criterion for the selection <strong>of</strong> a suitable adsorbent for collecting HS samples is the breakthrough<br />
volume limiting the amount <strong>of</strong> gas passing through the trap.
10 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
A comprehensive review concerning HS gas chromatographic analysis <strong>of</strong> medicinal <strong>and</strong> aromatic<br />
plants <strong>and</strong> flowers with 137 references, covering the period from 1982 to 1988 has been published<br />
by Bicchi <strong>and</strong> Joulain in 1990, thoroughly describing <strong>and</strong> explaining the different<br />
methodological approaches <strong>and</strong> applications. Among other things most <strong>of</strong> the important contributions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Finnish research group <strong>of</strong> Hiltunen <strong>and</strong> coworkers on the HS <strong>of</strong> medicinal plants <strong>and</strong><br />
the optimization <strong>of</strong> the HS parameters have been cited in the mentioned review.<br />
2.2.1.3.4 Solid-Phase Microextraction<br />
SPME is an easy-to-h<strong>and</strong>le sampling technique, initially developed for the determination <strong>of</strong> volatile<br />
organic compounds in environmental samples (Arthur et al., 1990), <strong>and</strong> has gained, in the last years,<br />
acceptance in numerous fields <strong>and</strong> has been applied to the analysis <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> analytes in<br />
various matrices. Sample preparation is based on sorption <strong>of</strong> analytes from a sample onto a coated<br />
fused silica fiber which is mounted in a modified GC syringe. After introducing the coated fiber into<br />
a liquid or gaseous sample, the compounds to be analyzed are enriched according to their distribution<br />
coefficients <strong>and</strong> can be subsequently thermally desorbed from the coating after introducing the<br />
fiber into the hot injector <strong>of</strong> a gas chromatograph. The commercially available SPME device<br />
(Supelco Inc.) consists <strong>of</strong> a 1 cm length fused silica fiber <strong>of</strong> ca. 100 μm diameter coated on the outer<br />
surface with a stationary phase fixed to a stainless steel plunger <strong>and</strong> a holder that looks like a<br />
modified microliter syringe. The fiber can be drawn into the syringe needle to prevent damage. To<br />
use the device, the needle is pierced through the septum that seals the sample vial. Then, the plunger<br />
is depressed lowering the coated fiber into the liquid sample or the HS above the sample. After sorption<br />
<strong>of</strong> the sample, which takes some minutes, the fiber has to be drawn back into the needle <strong>and</strong><br />
withdrawn from the sample vial. By the same procedure the fiber can be introduced into the gas<br />
chromatograph injector where the adsorbed substances are thermally desorbed <strong>and</strong> flushed by the<br />
carrier gas into the capillary GC column.<br />
SPME fibers can be coated with polymer liquid (e.g., polydimethylsiloxane, PDMS) or a mixed<br />
solid <strong>and</strong> liquid coating (e.g., Carboxen ® /PDMS). The selectivity <strong>and</strong> capacity <strong>of</strong> the fiber coating<br />
can be adjusted by changing the phase type or thickness <strong>of</strong> the coating on the fiber according to the<br />
properties <strong>of</strong> the compounds to be analyzed. Commercially available are coatings <strong>of</strong> 7, 30, <strong>and</strong><br />
100 μm <strong>of</strong> PDMS, an 85 μm polyacrylate, <strong>and</strong> several mixed coatings for different polar components.<br />
The influence <strong>of</strong> fiber coatings on the recovery <strong>of</strong> plant volatiles was thoroughly investigated<br />
by Bicchi et al. (2000). Details concerning the theory <strong>of</strong> SPME, technology, its application, <strong>and</strong><br />
specific topics have been described by Pawliszyn (1997) <strong>and</strong> references cited therein. A number <strong>of</strong><br />
different applications <strong>of</strong> SPME in the field <strong>of</strong> essential oil analysis have been presented by Kubeczka<br />
(1997a). An overview on publications <strong>of</strong> the period 2000–2005 with regard to HS-SPME has been<br />
recently published by Belliardo et al. (2006) covering the analysis <strong>of</strong> volatiles from aromatic <strong>and</strong><br />
medicinal plants, selection <strong>of</strong> the most effective fibers <strong>and</strong> sampling conditions, <strong>and</strong> discussing its<br />
advantages <strong>and</strong> limitations. The most comprehensive collection <strong>of</strong> references with regard to the different<br />
application <strong>of</strong> SPME can be obtained from Supelco on CD.<br />
2.2.1.3.5 Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction <strong>and</strong> Headspace Sorptive Extraction<br />
Despite the indisputable simplicity <strong>and</strong> rapidity <strong>of</strong> SPME, its applicability is limited by the small<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> sorbent on the needle (
History <strong>and</strong> Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research 11<br />
stir bar has to be removed, introduced into a glass tube, <strong>and</strong> transferred to thermal desorption<br />
instrument. After desorption <strong>and</strong> cry<strong>of</strong>ocusing within a cooled programmed temperature vaporization<br />
(PTV) injector, the volatiles were transferred onto the analytical GC column. Comparison <strong>of</strong><br />
SPME <strong>and</strong> the above- mentioned stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) technique using identical phases<br />
for both techniques exhibited striking differences in the recoveries, which has been attributed to ca.<br />
100 times higher phase ratio in SBSE than in SPME. A comprehensive treatment <strong>of</strong> SBSE, discussion<br />
<strong>of</strong> the principle, the extraction procedure, <strong>and</strong> numerous applications was recently been published<br />
by David <strong>and</strong> S<strong>and</strong>ra (2007).<br />
A further approach for sorptive enrichment <strong>of</strong> volatiles from the HS <strong>of</strong> aqueous or solid samples<br />
has been described by Tienpont et al. (2000), referred to as headspace sorptive extraction (HSSE).<br />
This technique implies the sorption <strong>of</strong> volatiles into PDMS that is chemically bound on the surface<br />
<strong>of</strong> a glass rod support. The device consists <strong>of</strong> a ca. 5 cm length glass rod <strong>of</strong> 2 mm diameter <strong>and</strong> at<br />
the last centimeter <strong>of</strong> 1 mm diameter. This last part is covered with PDMS chemically bound to the<br />
glass surface. HS bars with 30, 50, <strong>and</strong> 100 mg PDMS are commercially available from Gerstel<br />
GmbH, Mühlheim, Germany. After thermal conditioning at 300°C for 2 h, the glass bar was introduced<br />
into the HS <strong>of</strong> a closed 20 mL HS vial containing the sample to be investigated. After sampling<br />
for 45 min, the bar was put into a glass tube for thermal desorption, which was performed with<br />
a TDS-2 thermodesorption unit (Gerstel). After desorption <strong>and</strong> cry<strong>of</strong>ocusing within a PTV injector,<br />
the volatiles were transferred onto the analytical GC column. As a result, HSSE exceeded largely<br />
the sensitivity attainable with SPME. Several examples referring to the application <strong>of</strong> HSSE in HS<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> aromatic <strong>and</strong> medicinal plants inclusive <strong>of</strong> details <strong>of</strong> the sampling procedure were<br />
described by Bicchi et al. (2000).<br />
2.2.2 CHROMATOGRAPHIC SEPARATION TECHNIQUES<br />
In the course <strong>of</strong> the last half century, a great number <strong>of</strong> techniques have been developed <strong>and</strong> applied<br />
to the analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils. A part <strong>of</strong> them has been replaced nowadays by either more effective<br />
or easier-to-h<strong>and</strong>le techniques, while other methods maintained their significance <strong>and</strong> have been<br />
permanently improved. Before going into detail, the analytical facilities in the sixties <strong>of</strong> the last<br />
century should be considered briefly. The methods available for the analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils have<br />
been at that time (Table 2.1) thin-layer chromatography (TLC), various types <strong>of</strong> liquid column chromatography<br />
(LC), <strong>and</strong> already gas liquid chromatography (GC). In addition, several spectroscopic<br />
techniques such as UV <strong>and</strong> IR spectroscopy, MS, <strong>and</strong> 1 H-NMR spectroscopy have been available.<br />
TABLE 2.1<br />
Techniques Applied to the Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Chromatographic Techniques<br />
Including Two- <strong>and</strong> Multidimensional Techniques<br />
TLC GC LC HPLC<br />
CCC<br />
SFC<br />
Spectroscopic <strong>and</strong> Spectrometric Techniques<br />
UV IR MS 1H-NMR<br />
13C-NMR NIR Raman<br />
Hyphenated Techniques<br />
GC-MS GC-UV HPLC-GC SFE-GC<br />
GC-FTIR GC-AES HPLC-MS SFC-GC<br />
GC-FTIR-MS GC-IRMS HPLC-NMR
12 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
In the following years, several additional techniques were developed <strong>and</strong> applied to essential oils<br />
analysis, including: high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC); different kinds <strong>of</strong> countercurrent<br />
chromatography (CCC); supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC); including multidimensional<br />
coupling techniques, C-13 NMR, near infrared (NIR), <strong>and</strong> Raman spectroscopy; <strong>and</strong> a multitude<br />
<strong>of</strong> so-called hyphenated techniques, which means on-line couplings <strong>of</strong> chromatographic separation<br />
devices to spectrometers, yielding valuable structural information <strong>of</strong> the individual separated<br />
components made their identification feasible.<br />
2.2.2.1 Thin-Layer Chromatography<br />
TLC was one <strong>of</strong> the first chromatographic techniques <strong>and</strong> has been used for many years for the analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils. This method provided valuable information compared to simple measurements <strong>of</strong><br />
chemical <strong>and</strong> physical values <strong>and</strong> has therefore been adopted as a st<strong>and</strong>ard laboratory method for<br />
characterization <strong>of</strong> essential oils in numerous pharmacopoeias. Fundamentals <strong>of</strong> TLC have been<br />
described by Geiss (1987) <strong>and</strong> in a comprehensive h<strong>and</strong>book by Stahl (1969b), in which numerous<br />
applications <strong>and</strong> examples on investigations <strong>of</strong> secondary plant metabolites inclusive <strong>of</strong> essential oils<br />
are given. More recently, the third edition <strong>of</strong> the h<strong>and</strong>book <strong>of</strong> TLC from Shema <strong>and</strong> Fried (2003)<br />
appeared. Further approaches in TLC have been development <strong>of</strong> high-performance TLC (Kaiser, 1976),<br />
<strong>and</strong> the application <strong>of</strong> forced flow techniques such as overpressured layer chromatography (OPLC) <strong>and</strong><br />
rotation planar chromatography (RPC) described by Tyihák et al. (1979) <strong>and</strong> Nyiredy (2003).<br />
In spite <strong>of</strong> its indisputable simplicity <strong>and</strong> rapidity, this technique is now largely obsolete for analyzing<br />
such complex mixtures like essential oils, due to its low resolution. However, for the rapid<br />
investigation <strong>of</strong> the essential oil pattern <strong>of</strong> chemical races or the differentiation <strong>of</strong> individual plant<br />
species, this method can still be successfully applied (Gaedcke <strong>and</strong> Steinh<strong>of</strong>f, 2000). In addition,<br />
silver nitrate <strong>and</strong> silver perchlorate impregnated layers have been used for the separation <strong>of</strong> olefinic<br />
compounds, especially sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (Prasad et al., 1947), <strong>and</strong> more recently for the<br />
isolation <strong>of</strong> individual sesquiterpenes (Saritas, 2000).<br />
2.2.2.2 Gas Chromatography<br />
However, the separation capability <strong>of</strong> GC exceeded all the other separation techniques, even if only<br />
packed columns have been used. The exiting evolution <strong>of</strong> this technique in the past can be impressively<br />
demonstrated with four examples <strong>of</strong> the gas chromatographic separation <strong>of</strong> the essential oil<br />
from rue (Kubeczka, 1981a), a medicinal <strong>and</strong> aromatic plant. This oil was separated by S. Bruno in<br />
1961 into eight constituents <strong>and</strong> represented one <strong>of</strong> the first gas chromatographic analyses <strong>of</strong> that<br />
essential oil. Only a few years later in 1964 separation <strong>of</strong> the same oil has been improved using a<br />
Perkin Elmer (PE) gas chromatograph equipped with a 2 m packed column <strong>and</strong> a thermal conductivity<br />
detector (TCD) operated under isothermal conditions yielding 20 separated constituents.<br />
A further improvement <strong>of</strong> the separation <strong>of</strong> the rue oil was obtained after the introduction <strong>of</strong> temperature<br />
programming <strong>of</strong> the column oven, yielding approximately 80 constituents. The last significant<br />
improvements were a result <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> high-resolution capillary columns <strong>and</strong> the<br />
sensitive flame ionization detector (FID). By means <strong>of</strong> a 50 m glass capillary with 0.25 mm I.D., the<br />
rue oil could be separated into approximately 150 constituents, in 1981. However, the problems<br />
associated with the fragility <strong>of</strong> the glass capillaries <strong>and</strong> their cumbersome installation lessened the<br />
acknowledgment <strong>of</strong> this column types, despite their outst<strong>and</strong>ing quality. This has changed since<br />
flexible fused silica capillaries became commercially available, which are nearly unbreakable in<br />
normal usage. In addition, by different cross-linking technologies, the problems associated with<br />
wall coating, especially with polar phases, have been overcome, so that all important types <strong>of</strong><br />
stationary phases used in conventional GC have been commercially available. The most <strong>of</strong>ten used<br />
stationary phases for the analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils have been, <strong>and</strong> are still today, the polar phases<br />
Carbowax 20M (DB-Wax, Supelcowax-10, HP-20M, Innowax, etc.), 14% cyanopropylphenyl–86%<br />
methyl polysiloxane (DB-1701, SPB-1701, HP-1701, OV-1701, etc.), <strong>and</strong> the nonpolar phases PDMS<br />
(DB-1, SPB-1, HP-1 <strong>and</strong> HP-1ms, CPSil-5 CB, OV-1, etc.), <strong>and</strong> 5% phenyl methyl polysiloxane
History <strong>and</strong> Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research 13<br />
(DB-5, SPB-5, HP-5, CPSil-8 CB, OV-5, SE-54, etc.). Besides different column diameters <strong>of</strong> 0.53,<br />
0.32, 0.25, 0.10, <strong>and</strong> 0.05 mm I.D., a variety <strong>of</strong> film thicknesses can be purchased. Increasing column<br />
diameter <strong>and</strong> film thickness <strong>of</strong> stationary phase increases the sample capacity at the expense <strong>of</strong> separation<br />
efficiency. However, sample capacity has become important, particularly in trace analysis <strong>and</strong><br />
with some hyphenated techniques such as gas chromatography-Fourier transform infrared (GC-FTIR),<br />
in which a higher sample capacity is necessary when compared to GC-MS. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the<br />
application <strong>of</strong> a narrow bore column with 100 μm I.D. <strong>and</strong> a film coating <strong>of</strong> 0.2 μm have been shown<br />
to be highly efficient <strong>and</strong> theoretical plate numbers <strong>of</strong> approximately 250,000 were received with<br />
a 25 m capillary (Lancas et al., 1988). The most common detector in GC is the FID because <strong>of</strong> its<br />
high sensitivity toward organic compounds. The universal applicable TCD is nowadays used only for<br />
fixed-gas detection because <strong>of</strong> its very low sensitivity as compared to FID, <strong>and</strong> cannot be used in<br />
capillary GC. Nitrogen-containing compounds can be selectively detected with the aid <strong>of</strong> the selective<br />
nitrogen–phosphorus detector (NPD), <strong>and</strong> chlorinated compounds by the selective <strong>and</strong> very<br />
sensitive electron-capture detector (ECD), which is <strong>of</strong>ten used in the analysis <strong>of</strong> pesticides.<br />
Oxygen-containing compounds have been selectively detected with special O-FID analyzer even in<br />
very complex samples, which was primarily employed to the analysis <strong>of</strong> oxygenated compounds in<br />
gasoline, utilized as fuel-blending agents (Schneider et al., 1982). The oxygen selectivity <strong>of</strong> the FID<br />
is obtained by two on-line postcolumn reactions: First a cracking reaction forming carbon monoxide,<br />
which is reduced in a second reactor yielding equimolar quantities <strong>of</strong> methane, which can be<br />
sensitively detected by the FID. Since in total each oxygen atom is converted to one molecule methane,<br />
the FID response is proportional to the amount <strong>of</strong> oxygen in the respective molecule. Application<br />
<strong>of</strong> the O-FID to the analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils has been presented by Kubeczka (1991). However,<br />
conventional GC using fused silica capillaries with different stationary phases, including chiral<br />
phases, <strong>and</strong> the sensitive FID, is up to now the prime technique for the analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils.<br />
2.2.2.2.1 Fast <strong>and</strong> Ultrafast GC<br />
Due to the dem<strong>and</strong> for faster GC separations in routine work in the field <strong>of</strong> GC <strong>of</strong> essential oils, the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> fast <strong>and</strong> ultrafast GC seems worthy to be mentioned. The various approaches for fast<br />
GC have been reviewed in 1999 (Cramers et al., 1999). The most effective way to speed up GC separation<br />
without loosing separation efficiency is to use shorter columns with narrow inner diameter<br />
<strong>and</strong> thinner coatings, higher carrier gas flow rates, <strong>and</strong> accelerated temperature ramps. In Figure 2.1<br />
the conventional <strong>and</strong> fast GC separation <strong>of</strong> lime oil is shown, indicating virtually the same separation<br />
efficiency in the fast GC <strong>and</strong> a reduction in time from approximately 60 to 13 min (Mondello<br />
et al., 2000).<br />
An ultrafast GC separation <strong>of</strong> the essential oil from lime with an outst<strong>and</strong>ing reduction <strong>of</strong> time<br />
was recently achieved (Mondello et al., 2004) using a 5 m capillary with 50 μm I.D. <strong>and</strong> a film thickness<br />
<strong>of</strong> 0.05 μm operated with a high carrier gas velocity <strong>of</strong> 120 cm/min <strong>and</strong> an accelerated threestage<br />
temperature programme. The analysis <strong>of</strong> the essential oil was obtained in approximately<br />
90 sec, which equates to a speed gain <strong>of</strong> approximately 33 times in comparison with the conventional<br />
GC separation. However, such a separation cannot be performed with conventional GC<br />
instruments. In addition, the mass spectrometric identification <strong>of</strong> the separated components could<br />
only be achieved by coupling GC to a time-flight mass spectrometer. In Table 2.2 the separation<br />
parameters <strong>of</strong> conventional, fast, <strong>and</strong> ultrafast GC separation are given, indicating clearly the relatively<br />
low requirements for fast GC, while ultrafast separations can only be realized with modern<br />
GC instruments <strong>and</strong> need a significant higher employment.<br />
2.2.2.2.2 Chiral GC<br />
Besides fast <strong>and</strong> ultrafast GC separations, one <strong>of</strong> the most important developments in GC has been the<br />
introduction <strong>of</strong> enantioselective capillary columns in the past with high separation efficiency, so that a<br />
great number <strong>of</strong> chiral substances including many essential oil constituents could be separated <strong>and</strong><br />
identified. The different approaches <strong>of</strong> gas chromatographic separation <strong>of</strong> chiral compounds are briefly
14 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Monoterpenes Sesquiterpenes Coumarins<br />
<strong>and</strong> Psoralens<br />
0<br />
25 50<br />
Time (min)<br />
0 5 10<br />
FIGURE 2.1 Comparison <strong>of</strong> conventional <strong>and</strong> fast-GC separation <strong>of</strong> lime oil. (From Mondello, L., et al.,<br />
2000. LC.GC Europe, 13: 495–502. With permission.)<br />
summarized in Table 2.3. In the mid-1960s, Gil-Av published results with chiral diamide stationary<br />
phases for gas chromatographic separation <strong>of</strong> chiral compounds, which interacted with the analytes by<br />
hydrogen bonding forces (Gil-Av et al., 1965). The ability to separate enantiomers using these phases<br />
was therefore limited to substrates with hydrogen bonding donor or acceptor functions.<br />
Diastereomeric association between chiral molecules <strong>and</strong> chiral transition metal complexes was<br />
first described by Schurig in 1977. Since hydrogen bonding interaction is not essential for chiral<br />
recognition in such a system, a number <strong>of</strong> compounds could be separated, but this method was limited<br />
by the nonsufficient thermal stability <strong>of</strong> the applied metal complexes.<br />
In 1988 König, as well as Schurig, described the use <strong>of</strong> cyclodextrin derivatives that act enantioselectively<br />
by host–guest interaction by partial intrusion <strong>of</strong> enantiomers into the cyclodextrin cavity.<br />
They are cyclic a-(1–4)-bounded glucose oligomers with 6-, 7-, or 8-glucose units, which can be<br />
prepared by enzymatic degradation <strong>of</strong> starch with specific cyclodextrin-glucanosyltransferases from<br />
different bacterial strains, yielding a-, b-, <strong>and</strong> g-cyclodextrins <strong>and</strong> are commercially available. Due<br />
to the significant lower reactivity <strong>of</strong> the 3-hydroxygroups <strong>of</strong> cyclodextrins, this position can be<br />
selectively acylated after alkylation <strong>of</strong> the 2- <strong>and</strong> 6-positions (Figure 2.2), yielding several nonpolar<br />
cyclodextrin derivatives, which are liquid or waxy at room temperature <strong>and</strong> which proved very useful<br />
for gas chromatographic applications.<br />
TABLE 2.2<br />
Conditions <strong>of</strong> Conventional, Fast-, <strong>and</strong> Ultrafast GC<br />
Conventional GC Fast GC Ultrafast GC<br />
Column 30 m 10 m 10–15 m<br />
0.25 mm I.D. 0.1 mm I.D. 0.1 mm I.D.<br />
0.25 μm film 0.1 μm film 0.1 μm film<br />
Temperature program 50–350°C 50–350°C 45–325°C<br />
3°C/min 14°C/min 45–200°C/min<br />
Carrier gas H 2 H 2 H 2<br />
u = 36 cm/s u = 57 cm/s u = 120 cm/s<br />
Sampling frequency 10 Hz 20–50 Hz 50–250 Hz
History <strong>and</strong> Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research 15<br />
TABLE 2.3<br />
Different Approaches <strong>of</strong> Enantioselective GC<br />
1. Chiral diamide stationary phases (Gil-Av, 1965)<br />
Hydrogen bonding interaction<br />
2. Chiral transition metal complexation (Schurig, 1977)<br />
Complexation gas chromatography<br />
3. Cyclodextrin derivatives (König, Schurig, 1988)<br />
Host–guest interaction, inclusion gas chromatography<br />
König <strong>and</strong> coworkers reported their first results in 1988 with per-O-pentylated <strong>and</strong> selectively 3-Oacylated-2,6-di-O-pentylated<br />
a-, b-, <strong>and</strong> g-cyclodextrins, which are highly stable, soluble in nonpolar<br />
solvents, <strong>and</strong> which possess a high enantioselectivity toward many chiral compounds. In the following<br />
years a number <strong>of</strong> further cyclodextrin derivatives have been synthesized <strong>and</strong> tested by several groups,<br />
allowing the separation <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> chiral compounds, especially due to the improved thermal<br />
stability (Table 2.4). With the application <strong>of</strong> 2,3-pentyl-6-methyl-b- <strong>and</strong> -g-cyclodextrin as stationary<br />
phases, all monoterpene hydrocarbons commonly occurring in essential oils could be separated (König<br />
et al., 1992). The reason for application <strong>of</strong> two different columns with complementary properties was<br />
that on one column not all enantiomers were satisfactorily resolved. Thus, the simultaneous use <strong>of</strong> these<br />
two columns provided a maximum <strong>of</strong> information <strong>and</strong> reliability in peak assignment.<br />
After successful application <strong>of</strong> enantioselective GC to the analysis <strong>of</strong> enantiomeric composition<br />
<strong>of</strong> monoterpenoids in many essential oils (e.g., Werkh<strong>of</strong>f et al., 1993; Bicchi et al., 1995; <strong>and</strong> references<br />
cited therein), the studies have been extended to the sesquiterpene fraction. St<strong>and</strong>ard mixtures <strong>of</strong><br />
known enantiomeric composition were prepared by isolation <strong>of</strong> individual enantiomers from numerous<br />
essential oils by preparative GC <strong>and</strong> by preparative enantioselective GC. A gas chromatographic<br />
separation <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> isolated or prepared sesquiterpene hydrocarbon enantiomers, showing<br />
the separation <strong>of</strong> 12 commonly occurring sesquiterpene hydrocarbons on a 2,6-methyl-3-pentylb-cyclodextrin<br />
capillary column has been presented by König et al. (1995). Further investigations<br />
on sesquiterpenes have been published by König et al. (1994). However, due to the complexity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sesquiterpene pattern in many essential oils, it is <strong>of</strong>ten impossible to perform directly an enantioselective<br />
analysis by coinjection with st<strong>and</strong>ard samples on a capillary column with a chiral stationary<br />
phase alone. Therefore, in many cases two-dimensional GC had to be performed.<br />
2.2.2.2.3 Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography<br />
After preseparation <strong>of</strong> the oil on a nonchiral stationary phase, the peaks <strong>of</strong> interest have to be transferred<br />
to a second capillary column coated with a chiral phase, a technique usually referred to as<br />
“heart cutting.” In the simplest case, two GC capillaries with different selectivities are serially<br />
connected <strong>and</strong> the portion <strong>of</strong> unresolved components from the effluent <strong>of</strong> the first column is directed<br />
into a second column, for example, a capillary with a chiral coating. The basic arrangement used in<br />
two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC-GC) is shown in Figure 2.3. By means <strong>of</strong> a valve, the<br />
individual fractions <strong>of</strong> interest eluting from the first column are directed to the second, chiral<br />
column, while the rest <strong>of</strong> the sample may be discarded. With this heart-cutting technique many<br />
OR 6<br />
O<br />
O<br />
R 3 O<br />
FIGURE 2.2 a-Glucose unit <strong>of</strong> a cyclodextrin.<br />
R 2 O<br />
O
16 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 2.4<br />
Important Cyclodextrin Derivatives<br />
Research Group Year Cyclodextrin Derivative<br />
Schurig <strong>and</strong> Novotny 1988 Per-O-methyl-b-CD<br />
König et al. 1988a Per-O-pentyl-(a,b,g)-CD<br />
König et al. 1988c 3-O-acetyl-2,6,-di-O-pentyl-(a,b,g)-CD<br />
König et al. 1989 3-O-butyryl-2,6-di-O-pentyl-(b,g)-CD<br />
König et al. 1990 6-O-methyl-2,3-di-O-pentyl-g-CD<br />
Köng et al. 1992 2,6-Di-O-methyl-3-O-pentyl-(b,g)-CD<br />
Dietrich et al. 1992 2,3-Di-O-acetyl-6-O-tert-butyl-dimethysilyl-b-CD<br />
Dietrich et al. 1992a 2,3-Di-O-methyl-6-O-tert-butyl-dimethylsilyl-(b,g)-CD<br />
Bicchi et al. 1996 2,3-Di-O-ethyl-6-O-tert-butyl-dimethylsilyl-(b,g)-CD<br />
Takahisa <strong>and</strong> Engel 2005 2,3-Di-O-methoxymethyl-6-O-tert-butyl-dimethylsilyl-b-CD<br />
Takahisa <strong>and</strong> Engel 2005a 2,3-Di-O-methoxymethyl-6-O-tert-butyl-dimethylsilyl-g-CD<br />
separations <strong>of</strong> chiral oil constituents have been performed in the past. As an example, the investigation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the chiral sesquiterpene hydrocarbon germacrene D shall be mentioned (Kubeczka, 1996),<br />
which was found to be a main constituent <strong>of</strong> the essential oil from the flowering herb from Solidago<br />
canadensis. The enantioselective investigation <strong>of</strong> the germacrene-D fraction from a GC run using a<br />
nonchiral DB-Wax capillary transferred to a 2,6-methyl-3-pentyl-b-cyclodextrin capillary exhibited<br />
the presence <strong>of</strong> both enantiomers. This is worthy to be mentioned, since in most <strong>of</strong> other germacrene<br />
D containing higher plants nearly exclusively the (−)-enantiomer can be found.<br />
The previously mentioned two-dimensional GC design, however, in which a valve is used to<br />
direct the portion <strong>of</strong> desired effluent from the first into the second column, has obviously several<br />
shortcomings: The sample comes into contact with the metal surface <strong>of</strong> the valve body, the pressure<br />
drop <strong>of</strong> both connected columns may be significant <strong>and</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> only one-column oven does not<br />
permit to adjust the temperature for both columns properly. Therefore, one <strong>of</strong> the best approaches<br />
Injector<br />
Det.<br />
Vent<br />
Det.<br />
Tee<br />
Valve<br />
Column<br />
Column<br />
FIGURE 2.3 Basic arrangement used in two-dimensional GC.
History <strong>and</strong> Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research 17<br />
to overcome these limitations has been realized by a commercially available two-column<br />
oven instrument using a Deans-type pressure balancing interface between the two columns called a<br />
“live-T-connection” (Figure 2.4) providing considerable flexibility (Hener, 1990). By means <strong>of</strong> that<br />
instrument the enantiomeric composition <strong>of</strong> several essential oils has been investigated very successfully.<br />
As an example, the investigation <strong>of</strong> the essential oil from Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia shall be<br />
mentioned (Kreis et al., 1992) showing the simultaneous stereoanalysis <strong>of</strong> a mixture <strong>of</strong> chiral compounds,<br />
which can be found in lavender oils, using the column combination Carbowax 20M as the<br />
precolumn <strong>and</strong> 2,3-di-O-acetyl-6-O-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-b-cyclodextrin as the main column.<br />
All the unresolved enantiomeric pairs from the precolumn could be well separated after transferring<br />
them to the chiral main column in a single run. As a result, it was found that most <strong>of</strong> the characteristic<br />
<strong>and</strong> genuine chiral constituents <strong>of</strong> lavender oil exhibit a high enantiomeric purity.<br />
A different <strong>and</strong> inexpensive approach for transferring individual GC peaks onto a second column<br />
has been presented by Kubeczka (1997a), using an SPME device. The highly diluted organic vapor <strong>of</strong><br />
a fraction eluting from a GC capillary in the carrier gas flow has been absorbed on a coated SPME<br />
fiber <strong>and</strong> introduced onto a second capillary. As could be demonstrated, no modification <strong>of</strong> the gas<br />
chromatograph had to be performed to realize that approach. The eluting fractions were sampled<br />
after shutting the valves <strong>of</strong> the air, <strong>of</strong> hydrogen <strong>and</strong> the make-up gas if applied. In order to minimize<br />
the volume <strong>of</strong> the detector to avoid dilution <strong>of</strong> the eluting fraction <strong>and</strong> to direct the gas flow to the<br />
fiber surface, a capillary glass tubing <strong>of</strong> 1.5 mm I.D. was inserted into the FID <strong>and</strong> fixed <strong>and</strong> tightened<br />
by an O-ring (Figure 2.5). At the beginning <strong>of</strong> peak elution, controlled only by time, a 100 μm<br />
PDMS fiber was introduced into the mounted glass capillary tubing <strong>and</strong> withdrawn at the end <strong>of</strong> peak<br />
elution. Afterward, the fiber within the needle was introduced into the injector <strong>of</strong> a second capillary<br />
column with a chiral stationary phase. Two examples concerning the investigation <strong>of</strong> bergamot oil<br />
have been shown. At first, the analysis <strong>of</strong> an authentic sample <strong>of</strong> bergamot oil, containing chiral<br />
linalool <strong>and</strong> the respective chiral actetate is carried out. Both components were cut separately <strong>and</strong><br />
transferred to an enantioselective cyclodextrin Lipodex ® E capillary. The chromatograms clearly<br />
have shown that the authentic bergamot oil contains nearly exclusively the (−)-enantiomers <strong>of</strong> linalool<br />
<strong>and</strong> linalyl acetate, while the respective (+)-enantiomers could only be detected as traces. In contrast<br />
to the authentic sample, a commercial sample <strong>of</strong> bergamot oil, which was analyzed under the same<br />
Injector<br />
Nonchiral<br />
precolumn<br />
Δ p<br />
“live-T”<br />
Chiral main column<br />
ITD<br />
Oven I<br />
FID<br />
Detector precolumn<br />
Oven II<br />
: “Press-fit” connector<br />
FIGURE 2.4 Scheme <strong>of</strong> enantioselective multidimensional GC with “live-T” column switching. (From<br />
Hener, U. 1990. Chirale Aromast<strong>of</strong>fe—Beiträge zur Struktur, Wirkung und Analytik. Dissertation, Goethe-<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Frankfurt/Main, Germany. With permission.)
18 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
SPME-holder<br />
Inserted glass tubing<br />
O-ring<br />
Septum piercing needle<br />
Coated fused-silica fiber<br />
FID jet<br />
FIGURE 2.5 Cross section <strong>of</strong> an FID <strong>of</strong> an HP 5890 gas chromatograph with an inserted SPME fiber. (From<br />
Kubeczka, K.-H. 1997b. <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Symposium Proceedings, p. 145. With permission.)<br />
conditions, exhibited the presence <strong>of</strong> significant amounts <strong>of</strong> both enantiomers <strong>of</strong> linalool <strong>and</strong> linalyl<br />
acetate indicating a falsification by admixing the respective racemic alcohol <strong>and</strong> ester.<br />
2.2.2.2.4 Comprehensive Multidimensional Gas Chromatography<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the most powerful separation techniques that has been recently applied to the investigation<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils is the so-called comprehensive multidimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC).<br />
This technique is a true multidimensional gas chromatography (MDGC) since it combines two<br />
directly coupled columns <strong>and</strong> importantly is able to subject the entire sample to simultaneous twocolumn<br />
separation. Using that technique, the need to select heart cuts, as used in conventional<br />
MDGC, is no longer required. Since components now are retained in two different columns, the net<br />
capacity is the product <strong>of</strong> the capacities <strong>of</strong> the two applied columns increasing considerably the<br />
resolution <strong>of</strong> the total system. Details regarding that technique will be given in the chapter <strong>of</strong> Luigi<br />
Mondello.<br />
2.2.2.3 Liquid Column Chromatography<br />
The different types <strong>of</strong> LC have been mostly used in preparative or semipreparative scale for preseparation<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils or for isolation <strong>of</strong> individual oil constituents for structure elucidation<br />
with spectroscopic methods <strong>and</strong> were rarely used at that time as an analytical separation tool alone,<br />
because GC plays a central role in the study <strong>of</strong> essential oils.<br />
2.2.2.3.1 Preseparation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
A different approach besides two-dimensional GC, which has <strong>of</strong>ten been used in the past to overcome<br />
peak overlapping in a single GC run <strong>of</strong> an essential oil has been preseparation <strong>of</strong> the oil with<br />
LC. The most common method <strong>of</strong> fractionation is the separation <strong>of</strong> hydrocarbons from the oxygenated<br />
terpenoids according to Miller et al. (1952), using silica gel as an adsorbent. After elution <strong>of</strong> the<br />
nonpolar components from the column with pentane or hexane, the more polar oxygen-containing<br />
constituents are eluted in order <strong>of</strong> increasing polarity after applying more <strong>and</strong> more polar eluents.<br />
A very simple <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ardized fractionation in terms <strong>of</strong> speed <strong>and</strong> simplicity has been published<br />
by Kubeczka (1973) using dry-column chromatography. The procedure, which has been<br />
proved useful in numerous experiments for prefractionation <strong>of</strong> an essential oil, allows a preseparation<br />
into five fractions <strong>of</strong> increasing polarity. The preseparation <strong>of</strong> an essential oil into oxygenated<br />
constituents, monoterpene hydrocarbons, <strong>and</strong> sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, which is—depending on
History <strong>and</strong> Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research 19<br />
the oil composition—sometimes <strong>of</strong> higher practical use, can be performed successfully using<br />
reversed-phase RP-18 HPLC (Schwanbeck et al., 1982). The HPLC was operated on a semipreparative<br />
scale by stepwise elution with methanol–water 82.5:17.5 (solvent A) <strong>and</strong> pure methanol<br />
(solvent B). The elution order <strong>of</strong> the investigated oil was according to decreasing polarity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
components <strong>and</strong> within the group <strong>of</strong> hydrocarbons to increasing molecular weight. Fraction 1 contained<br />
all oxygenated mono- <strong>and</strong> sesquiterpenoids, fraction 2 the monoterpene hydrocarbons, <strong>and</strong><br />
fraction 3—eluted with pure methanol—the sesquiterpene hydrocarbons. A further alternative<br />
to the mentioned separation techniques is flash chromatography, initially developed by Still et al.<br />
(1978), <strong>and</strong> which has <strong>of</strong>ten been used as a rapid form <strong>of</strong> preparative LC based on a gas- or air<br />
pressure-driven short column chromatography. This technique, optimized for rapid separation <strong>of</strong><br />
quantities typically in the range <strong>of</strong> 0.5–2.0 g uses dry-packed silica gel in an appropriate column.<br />
The separation <strong>of</strong> the sample generally takes only 5–10 min <strong>and</strong> can be performed with inexpensive<br />
laboratory equipment. However, impurities <strong>and</strong> active sites on dried silica gel were found to be<br />
responsible for isomerization <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> oil constituents. After deactivation <strong>of</strong> the dried silica<br />
gel by adding 5% water, isomerization processes could be avoided (Scheffer et al., 1976). A different<br />
approach using HPLC on silica gel <strong>and</strong> isocratic elution with a ternary solvent system for the separation<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils has been published by Chamblee et al. (1985). In contrast to the aforementioned<br />
commonly used <strong>of</strong>f-line pretreatment <strong>of</strong> a sample, the coupling <strong>of</strong> two or more chromatographic<br />
systems in an on-line mode <strong>of</strong>fers advantages <strong>of</strong> ease <strong>of</strong> automation <strong>and</strong> usually <strong>of</strong> a shorter<br />
analysis time.<br />
2.2.2.3.2 High-Performance Liquid Column Chromatography<br />
The good separations obtained by GC have delayed the application <strong>of</strong> HPLC to the analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
essential oils; however, HPLC analysis <strong>of</strong>fers some advantages, if GC analysis <strong>of</strong> thermolabile compounds<br />
is difficult to achieve. Restricting factors for application <strong>of</strong> HPLC for analyses <strong>of</strong> terpenoids<br />
are the limitations inherent in the commonly available detectors <strong>and</strong> the relatively small range <strong>of</strong> k¢<br />
values <strong>of</strong> liquid chromatographic systems. Since temperature is an important factor that controls k¢<br />
values, separation <strong>of</strong> terpene hydrocarbons was performed at –15°C using a silica gel column <strong>and</strong><br />
n-pentane as a mobile phase. Monitoring has been achieved with UV detection at 220 nm. Under<br />
these conditions, mixtures <strong>of</strong> commonly occurring mono- <strong>and</strong> sesquiterpene hydrocarbons could be<br />
well separated (Schwanbeck et al., 1979; Kubeczka, 1981b). However, the silica gel had to be deactivated<br />
by adding 4.8% water prior to separation to avoid irreversible adsorption or alteration <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sample. The investigation <strong>of</strong> different essential oils by HPLC already has been described in the<br />
seventies <strong>of</strong> the last century (e.g., Komae et al., 1975; Ross, 1976; Wulf et al., 1978; McKone, 1979;<br />
Scott <strong>and</strong> Kucera, 1979). In the last publication, the authors have used a rather long microbore<br />
packed column, which had several hundred thous<strong>and</strong> theoretical plates. Besides relatively expensive<br />
equipment, the HPLC chromatogram <strong>of</strong> an essential oil, separated on such a column could only be<br />
obtained at the expense <strong>of</strong> long analysis time. The mentioned separation needed about 20 h <strong>and</strong> may<br />
be only <strong>of</strong> little value in practical applications.<br />
More recent papers with regard to HPLC separation <strong>of</strong> essential oils were published, for example,<br />
by Debrunner et al. (1995), Bos et al. (1996), Frérot et al. (2004), <strong>and</strong> applications using silver<br />
ion-impregnated sorbents have been presented by Pettei et al. (1977), Morita et al. (1983), Friedel<br />
et al. (1987), <strong>and</strong> van Beek et al. (1994). The literature on the use <strong>and</strong> theory <strong>of</strong> silver complexation<br />
chromatography has been reviewed by van Beek et al. (1995). HPLC has also been used to separate<br />
thermally labile terpenoids at low temperature by Beyer et al. (1986), showing the temperature<br />
dependence <strong>of</strong> the separation efficiency. The investigation <strong>of</strong> an essential oil fraction from Cistus<br />
ladanifer using RP-18 reversed-phase HPLC at ambient temperature <strong>and</strong> an acetonitrile-water<br />
gradient was published by Strack et al. (1980). Comparison <strong>of</strong> the obtained HPLC chromatogram<br />
with the respective GC run exhibits a relatively good HPLC separation in the range <strong>of</strong> sesqui- <strong>and</strong><br />
diterpenes, while the monoterpenes exhibited, as expected, a significant better resolution by GC.<br />
The enantiomeric separation <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenes by HPLC with a chiral stationary phase has recently<br />
been shown by Nishii et al. (1997), using a Chiralcel ® OD column.
20 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
2.2.2.4 Supercritical Fluid Chromatography<br />
Supercritical fluids are highly compressed gases above their critical temperature <strong>and</strong> critical pressure<br />
point, representing a hybrid state between a liquid <strong>and</strong> a gas <strong>and</strong> which have physical properties<br />
intermediate between liquid <strong>and</strong> gas phases. The diffusion coefficient <strong>of</strong> a fluid is about two orders<br />
<strong>of</strong> magnitude larger <strong>and</strong> the viscosity is two orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude lower than the corresponding<br />
properties <strong>of</strong> a liquid. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, a supercritical fluid has a significant higher density than a<br />
gas. The commonly used carbon dioxide as a mobile phase, however, exhibits a low polarity<br />
(comparable to pentane or hexane), limiting the solubility <strong>of</strong> polar compounds, a problem that has<br />
been solved by adding small amounts <strong>of</strong> polar solvents, for example, methanol or ethanol, to increase<br />
mobile-phase polarity, thus permitting separations <strong>of</strong> more polar compounds (Chester et al., 1986).<br />
A further strength <strong>of</strong> SFC lies in the variety <strong>of</strong> detection systems that can be applied. The intermediate<br />
features <strong>of</strong> SFC between GC <strong>and</strong> LC can be pr<strong>of</strong>itable when used in a variety <strong>of</strong> detection<br />
systems, which can be classified in LC- <strong>and</strong> GC-like detectors. In the first case, measurement takes<br />
place directly in the supercritical medium or in the liquid phase, whereas GC-like detection proceeds<br />
after a decompression stage.<br />
Capillary SFC using carbon dioxide as mobile phase <strong>and</strong> a FID as detector has been applied to<br />
the analysis <strong>of</strong> several essential oils <strong>and</strong> seemed to give more reliable quantification than GC,<br />
especially for oxygenated compounds. However, the separation efficiency <strong>of</strong> GC for monoterpene<br />
hydrocarbons was, as expected, better than that <strong>of</strong> SFC. Manninen et al. (1990) published a<br />
comparison <strong>of</strong> a capillary GC versus a chromatogram obtained by capillary SFC from a linalool–<br />
methylchavicol basil oil chemotype exhibiting a fairly good separation by SFC.<br />
2.2.2.5 Countercurrent Chromatography<br />
CCC is according to Conway (1989) a form <strong>of</strong> liquid–liquid partition chromatography, in which<br />
centrifugal or gravitational forces are employed to maintain one liquid phase in a coil or train <strong>of</strong><br />
chambers stationary, while a stream <strong>of</strong> a second, immiscible phase is passed through the system in<br />
contact with the stationary liquid phase. Retention <strong>of</strong> the individual components <strong>of</strong> the sample to be<br />
analyzed depends only on their partition coefficients <strong>and</strong> the volume ratio <strong>of</strong> the two applied liquid<br />
phases. Since there is no porous support, adsorption <strong>and</strong> catalytic effects encountered with solid<br />
supports are avoided.<br />
2.2.2.5.1 Droplet Countercurrent Chromatography (DCCC)<br />
One form <strong>of</strong> CCC, which has been sporadically applied to separate essential oils into fractions or in<br />
the ideal case into individual pure components, is DCCC. The device, which has been developed by<br />
Tanimura et al. (1970), consists <strong>of</strong> 300–600 glass tubes, which are connected to each other in series<br />
with Teflon ® tubing <strong>and</strong> filled with a stationary liquid. Separation is achieved by passing droplets <strong>of</strong><br />
the mobile phase through the columns, thus distributing mixture components at different ratios<br />
leading to their separation. With the development <strong>of</strong> a water-free solvent system, separation <strong>of</strong><br />
essential oils could be achieved (Becker et al., 1981, 1982). Along with the separation <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oils, the method allows the concentration <strong>of</strong> minor components, since relatively large samples can<br />
be separated in one analytical run (Kubeczka, 1985).<br />
2.2.2.5.2 Rotation Locular Countercurrent Chromatography (RLCC)<br />
The RLCC apparatus (Rikakikai Co., Tokyo, Japan) consists <strong>of</strong> 16 concentrically arranged <strong>and</strong><br />
serially connected glass tubes. These tubes are divided by Teflon ® disks with a small hole in the<br />
center, thus creating small compartments or locules. After filling the tubes with the stationary<br />
liquid, the tubes are inclined to a 30° angle from horizontal. In the ascending mode the lighter<br />
mobile phase is applied to the bottom <strong>of</strong> the first tube by a constant flow pump, displacing the<br />
stationary phase as its volume attains the level <strong>of</strong> the hole in the disk. The mobile phase passes<br />
through this hole <strong>and</strong> enters into the next compartment, where the process continues until the<br />
mobile phase emerges from the uppermost locule. Finally, the two phases fill approximately half
History <strong>and</strong> Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research 21<br />
<strong>of</strong> each compartment. The dissolved essential oil subsequently introduced is subjected to a<br />
multistage partitioning process that leads to separation <strong>of</strong> the individual components. Whereas<br />
gravity contributes to the phase separation; rotation <strong>of</strong> the column assembly (60–80 rpm) produces<br />
circular stirring <strong>of</strong> the two liquids to promote partition. If the descending mode is selected<br />
for separation, the heavier mobile phase is applied at the top <strong>of</strong> each column by switching a valve.<br />
An overview on applications <strong>of</strong> RLCC in natural products isolation inclusive <strong>of</strong> a detailed<br />
description <strong>of</strong> the device <strong>and</strong> the selection <strong>of</strong> appropriate solvent systems has been presented by<br />
Snyder et al. (1984).<br />
Comparing RLCC to the aforementioned DCCC, one can particularly stress the superior flexibility<br />
<strong>of</strong> RLCC. While DCCC requires under all circumstances a two-phase system able to form<br />
droplets in the stationary phase, the choice <strong>of</strong> solvent systems with RLCC is nearly free. So the limitations<br />
<strong>of</strong> DCCC, when analyzing lipophilic samples, do not apply to RLCC. The separation <strong>of</strong> a<br />
mixture <strong>of</strong> terpenes has been presented by Kubeczka (1985). A different method, the high-speed<br />
centrifugal countercurrent chromatography (HSCCC) developed by Ito <strong>and</strong> coworkers in the mid <strong>of</strong><br />
the sixties <strong>of</strong> the last century (Ito et al., 1966), has been applied to separate a variety <strong>of</strong> nonvolatile<br />
natural compounds; however, separation <strong>of</strong> volatiles has, strange to say, until now not seriously been<br />
evaluated.<br />
2.2.3 HYPHENATED TECHNIQUES<br />
2.2.3.1 Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry<br />
The advantage on-line coupling <strong>of</strong> a chromatographic device to a spectrometer is that complex mixtures<br />
can be analyzed in detail by spectral interpretation <strong>of</strong> the separated individual components.<br />
The coupling <strong>of</strong> a gas chromatograph with a mass spectrometer is the most <strong>of</strong>ten used <strong>and</strong> a wellestablished<br />
technique for the analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils, due to the development <strong>of</strong> easy-to-h<strong>and</strong>le<br />
powerful systems concerning sensitivity, data acquisition <strong>and</strong> processing, <strong>and</strong> above all their relatively<br />
low cost. The very first application <strong>of</strong> a GC-MS coupling for the identification <strong>of</strong> essential oil<br />
constituents using a capillary column was already published by Buttery et al. (1963). In those times,<br />
mass spectra have been traced on UV recording paper with a five-element galvanometer <strong>and</strong> their<br />
evaluation was a considerable cumbersome task.<br />
This has changed after the introduction <strong>of</strong> computerized mass digitizers yielding the mass<br />
numbers <strong>and</strong> the relative mass intensities. The different kinds <strong>of</strong> GC-MS couplings available at the<br />
end <strong>of</strong> the seventies <strong>of</strong> the last century have been described in detail by ten Noever de Brauw<br />
(1979). In addition, different types <strong>of</strong> mass spectrometers have been applied in GC-MS investigations<br />
such as magnetic sector instruments, quadrupole mass spectrometers, ion-trap analyzers<br />
(e.g., ion-trap detector, ITD), <strong>and</strong> time-<strong>of</strong>-flight mass spectrometers, which are the fastest MS<br />
analyzers <strong>and</strong> therefore used for very fast GC-MS systems (e.g., in comprehensive multidimensional<br />
GC-MS). Surprisingly, a time-<strong>of</strong>-flight mass spectrometer was used in the very first description<br />
<strong>of</strong> a GC-MS investigation <strong>of</strong> an essential oil mentioned before. From the listed spectrometers,<br />
the magnetic sector <strong>and</strong> quadrupole instruments can also be used for selective ion monitoring<br />
(SIM), to improve sensitivity for the analysis <strong>of</strong> target compounds <strong>and</strong> for discrimination <strong>of</strong><br />
overlapping GC peaks.<br />
The great majority <strong>of</strong> today’s GC-MS applications utilize one-dimensional capillary GC with<br />
quadrupole MS detection <strong>and</strong> electron ionization. Nevertheless, there are substantial numbers <strong>of</strong><br />
applications using different types <strong>of</strong> mass spectrometers <strong>and</strong> ionization techniques. The proliferation<br />
<strong>of</strong> GC-MS applications is also a result <strong>of</strong> commercially available easy-to-h<strong>and</strong>le dedicated<br />
mass spectral libraries (e.g., NIST/EPA/NIH 2005; WILEY Registry 2006; MassFinder 2007; <strong>and</strong><br />
diverse printed versions such as Jennings <strong>and</strong> Shibamoto, 1980; Joulain <strong>and</strong> König, 1998; <strong>and</strong><br />
Adams, 1989, 1995, 2007 inclusive <strong>of</strong> retention indices) providing identification <strong>of</strong> the separated<br />
compounds. However, this type <strong>of</strong> identification has the potential <strong>of</strong> producing some unreliable<br />
results, if no additional information is used, since some compounds, for example, the sesquiterpene
22 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
hydrocarbons a-cuprenene <strong>and</strong> b-himachalene, exhibit identical fragmentation pattern <strong>and</strong> only<br />
very small differences <strong>of</strong> their retention index values. This example demonstrates impressively that<br />
even a good library match <strong>and</strong> the additional use <strong>of</strong> retention data may lead in some cases to questionable<br />
results, <strong>and</strong> therefore require additional analytical data, for example, from NMR<br />
measurements.<br />
2.2.3.1.1 Gas Chromatography-Chemical Ionization-Mass Spectrometry <strong>and</strong><br />
Gas Chromatography-T<strong>and</strong>em Mass Spectrometry<br />
Although GC-electron impact (EI)-MS is a very useful tool for the analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils, this technique<br />
can sometimes be not selective enough <strong>and</strong> requires more sophisticated techniques such as gas<br />
chromatography-chemical ionization-mass spectrometry (GC-CI-MS) <strong>and</strong> gas chromatographyt<strong>and</strong>em<br />
mass spectrometry (GC-MS-MS). The application <strong>of</strong> CI-MS using different reactant gases<br />
is particularly useful, since many terpene alcohols <strong>and</strong> esters fail to show a molecular ion. The use<br />
<strong>of</strong> OH − as a reactant ion in negative CI-MS appeared to be an ideal solution to this problem. This<br />
technique yielded highly stable quasi-molecular-ions M–H, which are <strong>of</strong>ten the only ions in the<br />
obtained spectra <strong>of</strong> the above-mentioned compounds. As an example, the EI <strong>and</strong> CI spectra <strong>of</strong><br />
isobornyl isovalerate—a constituent <strong>of</strong> valerian oil—shall be quoted (Bos et al., 1982). The respective<br />
EI mass spectrum shows only a very small molecular ion at 238. Therefore, the chemical ionization<br />
spectra <strong>of</strong> isobornyl acetate were performed exhibiting with isobutene as a reactant gas a<br />
[C 10 H 17 ] + -cation <strong>and</strong> in the negative CI-mode with OH - as a reactant gas two signals with the masses<br />
101, the isovalerate anion, <strong>and</strong> 237 the quasi-molecular-ion [M–H] − . Considering all these obtained<br />
data, the correct structure <strong>of</strong> the oil constituent could be deduced. The application <strong>of</strong> isobutane <strong>and</strong><br />
ammonia as reactant gases has been presented by Schultze et al. (1992), who investigated sesquiterpene<br />
hydrocarbons by GC-CI-MS. Fundamental aspects <strong>of</strong> chemical ionization MS have been<br />
reviewed by Bruins (1987), discussing the different reactant gases applied in positive <strong>and</strong> negative<br />
ion chemical ionization <strong>and</strong> their applications in essential oil analysis.<br />
The utilization <strong>of</strong> GC-MS-MS to the analysis <strong>of</strong> a complex mixture will be shown in Figure 2.6.<br />
In the investigated vetiver oil (Cazaussus et al., 1988), one constituent, the nor-sesquiterpene ketone<br />
khusimone, has been identified by using GC-MS-MS in the collision-activated-dissociation mode.<br />
The molecular ion at m/z 204 exhibited a lot <strong>of</strong> daughter ions, but only one <strong>of</strong> them gave a daughter<br />
M +–<br />
Neutral loss <strong>of</strong> m/z 96<br />
204<br />
Fragment ion<br />
M +–<br />
×5<br />
108<br />
M +–<br />
Daughter ions<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
m/z 204<br />
30<br />
96<br />
108 (Main beam)<br />
(Main beam)<br />
Parent ions<br />
<strong>of</strong> m/z 108<br />
91<br />
119<br />
148<br />
161<br />
175<br />
189<br />
204<br />
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 m/z<br />
FIGURE 2.6 GC-EIMS-MS <strong>of</strong> khusimone <strong>of</strong> vetiver oil. (From Cazaussus, A., et al., 1988. Chromatographia,<br />
25: 865–869. With permission.)
History <strong>and</strong> Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research 23<br />
ion at m/z 108, a fragment rarely occurring in sesquiterpene derivatives so that the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
khusimone could be undoubtedly identified.<br />
2.2.3.2 High-Resolution Gas Chromatography-Fourier Transform<br />
Infrared Spectroscopy<br />
A further hyphenated technique, providing valuable analytical information is the on-line coupling <strong>of</strong><br />
a gas chromatograph with a FTIR spectrometer. The capability <strong>of</strong> IR spectroscopy to provide discrimination<br />
between isomers makes the coupling <strong>of</strong> a gas chromatograph to an FTIR spectrometer<br />
suited as a complementary method to GC/MS for the analysis <strong>of</strong> complex mixtures like essential oils.<br />
The GC/FTIR device consists basically <strong>of</strong> a capillary gas chromatograph <strong>and</strong> an FTIR spectrometer<br />
including a dedicated computer <strong>and</strong> ancillary equipment. As each GC peak elutes from the GC column,<br />
it enters a heated IR measuring cell, the so-called light pipe, usually a gold-plated glass tube<br />
with IR transparent windows. There the spectrum is measured as an interferogram from which the<br />
familiar absorbance spectrum can be calculated by computerized Fourier transformation. After passing<br />
the light pipe, the effluent is directed back into the FID <strong>of</strong> the gas chromatograph. More detailed<br />
information on the experimental setup was given by Herres et al. (1986) <strong>and</strong> Herres (1987).<br />
In the latter publication, for example, the vapor-phase IR spectra <strong>of</strong> all the four isomers <strong>of</strong><br />
pulegol <strong>and</strong> dihydrocarveol are shown, which have been extracted from a GC/FTIR run. These<br />
examples convincingly demonstrate the capability <strong>of</strong> distinguishing geometrical isomers with the<br />
aid <strong>of</strong> vapor-phase IR spectra, which cannot be achieved by their mass spectra. A broad application<br />
<strong>of</strong> GC-FTIR in the analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils, however, is limited by the lack <strong>of</strong> sufficient vaporphase<br />
spectra <strong>of</strong> uncommon compounds, which are needed for reference use, since the spectra <strong>of</strong><br />
isolated molecules in the vapor phase can be significantly different from the corresponding condensed-phase<br />
spectra.<br />
A different approach has been published by Reedy et al. in 1985, using a cryogenically freezing<br />
<strong>of</strong> the GC effluent admixed with an inert gas (usually argon) onto a rotating disk maintained at<br />
liquid He temperature to form a solid matrix trace. After the separation, reflection absorption spectra<br />
can be obtained from the deposited solid trace. A further technique published by Bourne et al. (1990)<br />
is the subambient trapping, whereby the GC effluent is cryogenically frozen onto a moving IR transparent<br />
window <strong>of</strong> zinc selenide (ZnSe). An advantage <strong>of</strong> the latter technique is that the unlike larger<br />
libraries <strong>of</strong> conventional IR spectra can be searched in contrast to the limited number <strong>of</strong> vaporphase<br />
spectra <strong>and</strong> those obtained by matrix isolation. A further advantage <strong>of</strong> both cryogenic techniques<br />
is the significant higher sensitivity, which exceeds the detection limits <strong>of</strong> a light pipe<br />
instrument by approximately two orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude.<br />
Comparing GC/FTIR <strong>and</strong> GC/MS, advantages <strong>and</strong> limitations <strong>of</strong> each technique become visible.<br />
The strength <strong>of</strong> IR lies—as discussed before—in distinguishing isomers, whereas identification <strong>of</strong><br />
homologues can only be performed successfully by MS. The logical <strong>and</strong> most sophisticated way to<br />
overcome these limitations has been the development <strong>of</strong> a combined GC/FTIR/MS instrument,<br />
whereby simultaneously IR <strong>and</strong> mass spectra can be obtained.<br />
2.2.3.3 Gas Chromatography-Ultraviolet Spectroscopy<br />
The instrumental coupling <strong>of</strong> gas chromatograph with a rapid scanning UV spectrometer has been<br />
presented by Kubeczka et al. (1989). In this study, a UV-VIS diode-array spectrometer (Zeiss,<br />
Oberkochen, FRG) with an array <strong>of</strong> 512 diodes was used, which provided continuous monitoring in<br />
the range <strong>of</strong> 200–620 nm. By interfacing the spectrometer via fiber optics to a heated flow cell,<br />
which was connected by short heated capillaries to the GC column effluent, interferences <strong>of</strong><br />
chromatographic resolution could be minimized. With the aid <strong>of</strong> this device, several terpene hydrocarbons<br />
have been investigated. In addition to displaying individual UV spectra, the available<br />
s<strong>of</strong>tware rendered the analyst to define <strong>and</strong> to display individual window traces, three-dimensional<br />
plots <strong>and</strong> contour plots, which are valuable tools for discovering <strong>and</strong> deconvoluting gas chromatographic<br />
unresolved peaks.
24 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
2.2.3.4 Gas Chromatography-Atomic Emission Spectroscopy<br />
A device for the coupling <strong>of</strong> capillary gas chromatography with atomic emission spectroscopy<br />
(GC-AES) has been presented by Wylie et al. (1989). By means <strong>of</strong> this coupling 23 elements <strong>of</strong> a<br />
compound including all elements <strong>of</strong> organic substances separated by GC could be selectively<br />
detected providing the analyst not only with valuable information on the elemental composition <strong>of</strong><br />
the individual components <strong>of</strong> a mixture, but also with the percentages <strong>of</strong> the elemental composition.<br />
The device incorporates a microwave-induced helium plasma at the outlet <strong>of</strong> the column coupled to<br />
an optical emission spectrometer. From the 15 most commonly occurring elements in organic compounds<br />
up to eight could be detected <strong>and</strong> measured simultaneously, for example, C, O, N, <strong>and</strong> S,<br />
which are <strong>of</strong> importance with respect to the analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils. The examples given in the<br />
literature (e.g., Wylie et al., 1989; Bicchi et al., 1992; David et al., 1992; Jirovetz et al., 1992; Schultze,<br />
1993) indicate that the GC-AES coupling can provide the analyst with additional valuable information,<br />
which are to some extent complementary to the date obtained by GC-MS <strong>and</strong> GC-FTIR, making<br />
the respective library searches more reliable <strong>and</strong> more certain.<br />
However, the combined techniques GC-UV <strong>and</strong> GC-AES have not gained much importance in<br />
the field <strong>of</strong> essential oil research, since UV-spectra <strong>of</strong>fer only low information <strong>and</strong> the coupling <strong>of</strong><br />
a GC-AES, yielding the exact elemental composition <strong>of</strong> a component, can to some extent be obtained<br />
by precise mass measurement. Nevertheless, the on-line coupling GC-AES is still today efficiently<br />
used in environmental investigations.<br />
2.2.3.5 Gas Chromatography-Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry<br />
In addition to enantioselective capillary gas chromatography the on-line coupling <strong>of</strong> gas chromatography<br />
with isotope-ratio mass spectrometry (GC-IRMS) is an important technique in authentication<br />
<strong>of</strong> food flavors <strong>and</strong> essential oil constituents. The on-line combustion <strong>of</strong> effluents from capillary gas<br />
chromatographic separations to determine the isotopic compositions <strong>of</strong> individual components from<br />
complex mixtures was demonstrated by Matthews et al. (1978). On the basis <strong>of</strong> this work, the on-line<br />
interfacing <strong>of</strong> capillary GC with IRMS was later improved. With the commercially available<br />
GC-combustion IRMS device (GC-C-IRMS) measurements <strong>of</strong> the ratios <strong>of</strong> the stable isotopes 13 C/ 12 C<br />
have been accessible <strong>and</strong> respective investigations have been reported in several papers (e.g., Carle<br />
et al., 1990; Bernreuther et al., 1990; Braunsdorf et al., 1992, 1993; Frank et al., 1995; Mos<strong>and</strong>l et al.,<br />
1997). A further improvement was the development <strong>of</strong> the GC-pyrolysis-IRMS (GC-P-IRMS) making<br />
measurements <strong>of</strong> 18 O/ 16 O ratios <strong>and</strong> later 2 H/ 1 H ratios feasible (Juchelka et al., 1998; Ruff et al.,<br />
2000; Hör et al., 2001; Mos<strong>and</strong>l, 2004). Thus, the GC-P-IRMS device (Figure 2.7) appears today as<br />
one <strong>of</strong> the most sophisticated instruments for the appraisal <strong>of</strong> the genuineness <strong>of</strong> natural mixtures.<br />
2.2.3.6 High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Gas Chromatography<br />
The on-line coupling <strong>of</strong> an HPLC device to a capillary gas chromatograph <strong>of</strong>fers a number <strong>of</strong><br />
advantages, above all higher column chromatographic efficiency, simple <strong>and</strong> rapid method development,<br />
simple cleanup <strong>of</strong> samples from complex matrices, <strong>and</strong> effective enrichment <strong>of</strong> the components<br />
<strong>of</strong> interest; additionally, the entire analytical procedure can easily be automated, thus increasing<br />
accuracy <strong>and</strong> reproducibility. The commercially available HPLC-GC coupling consists <strong>of</strong> an HPLC<br />
device that is connected with a capillary gas chromatograph via an interface allowing the transfer<br />
<strong>of</strong> HPLC fractions. Two different types <strong>of</strong> interfaces have been <strong>of</strong>ten used: The on-column interface<br />
is a modification <strong>of</strong> the on-column injector for GC; it is particularly suited for the transfer <strong>of</strong> fairly<br />
small fraction containing volatile constituents (Dugo et al., 1994; Mondello et al., 1994a, b, 1995).<br />
The second interface uses a sample loop <strong>and</strong> allows to transfer large sample volumes (up to 1 mL)<br />
containing components with limited volatilities. Figure 2.8 gives a schematic view <strong>of</strong> such an<br />
LC-GC instrument. In the shown position <strong>of</strong> the six-port valve, the desired fraction <strong>of</strong> the HPLC<br />
effluent is stored in the sample loop, while the carrier gas is passed through the GC columns. After<br />
switching the valve, the content <strong>of</strong> the sample loop is driven by the carrier gas into the large volume<br />
injector, vaporized <strong>and</strong> enters the precolumns, where the sample components are retained <strong>and</strong> most
History <strong>and</strong> Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research 25<br />
MDGC Interface Mass spectrometer<br />
He<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
Ion<br />
H 2<br />
source 90º magnet<br />
Multicolumn<br />
switching system<br />
MCS 2<br />
Injector<br />
Monitor<br />
detector<br />
Pyrolysis<br />
reactor<br />
T=1450ºC<br />
Water<br />
separator<br />
He<br />
Open<br />
split<br />
CH 4<br />
2 3<br />
Faraday cups<br />
<strong>and</strong><br />
amplifiers<br />
Precolumn<br />
Transfer line<br />
heated<br />
Main column<br />
FIGURE 2.7 Scheme <strong>of</strong> an MDGC-C/P-IRMS device. (From Sewenig, S., et al., 2005. J. Agric. Chem., 53:<br />
838–844. With permission.)<br />
<strong>of</strong> the solvent vapor can be removed through the solvent vapor exit (SVE). After closing this valve<br />
<strong>and</strong> increasing the GC-oven temperature, the sample components are volatilized <strong>and</strong> separated in<br />
the main column reaching the detector. The main drawback <strong>of</strong> this technique, however, may be the<br />
loss <strong>of</strong> highly volatile compounds that are vented together with the solvent. As an example <strong>of</strong> an<br />
HPLC-GC investigation, the preseparation <strong>of</strong> lemon oil with gradient elution into four fractions is<br />
quoted (Munari et al., 1990). The respective gas chromatograms <strong>of</strong> the individual fractions exhibit<br />
good separation into hydrocarbons, esters, carbonyls, <strong>and</strong> alcohols, facilitating gas chromatographic<br />
separation <strong>and</strong> identification. Due to automation <strong>of</strong> all analytical steps involved, the manual<br />
Waste<br />
Carrier<br />
SVE<br />
LVI<br />
DE<br />
Sample<br />
HPLC<br />
column<br />
HPLC RG C1 C2<br />
FIGURE 2.8 Basic arrangement <strong>of</strong> an HPLC-GC device with a sample loop interface. RG: retention gap;<br />
C1: retaining column; C2: analytical column; LVI: large volume injector; <strong>and</strong> SVE: solvent vapor exit.
26 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
operations are significantly reduced <strong>and</strong> very good reproducibility was obtained. In three excellent<br />
review articles, the different kinds <strong>of</strong> HPLC-GC couplings are discussed in detail, describing their<br />
advantages <strong>and</strong> limitations with numerous references cited therein (Mondello et al., 1996, 1999;<br />
Dugo et al., 2003).<br />
2.2.3.7 HPLC-MS, HPLC-NMR Spectroscopy<br />
The on-line couplings <strong>of</strong> HPLC with MS <strong>and</strong> NMR spectroscopy are further important techniques<br />
combining high-performance separation with structurally informative spectroscopic techniques,<br />
but they are mainly applied to nonvolatile mixtures <strong>and</strong> shall not be discussed in more detail here,<br />
although they are very useful for investigating plant extracts.<br />
Some details concerning the different ionization techniques used in HPLC-MS have been presented<br />
among other things by Dugo et al. (2005).<br />
2.2.3.8 Supercritical Fluid Extraction-Gas Chromatography<br />
Although SFE is not a chromatographic technique, separation <strong>of</strong> mixtures can be obtained during<br />
the extraction process by varying the physical properties such as temperature <strong>and</strong> pressure to obtain<br />
fractions <strong>of</strong> different composition. Detailed reviews on the physical background <strong>of</strong> SFE <strong>and</strong> its<br />
application to natural products analysis inclusive <strong>of</strong> numerous applications have been published by<br />
Modey et al. (1995), <strong>and</strong> more recently by Pourmortazavi et al. (2007). The different types <strong>of</strong><br />
couplings (<strong>of</strong>f-line <strong>and</strong> on-line) have been presented by several authors. Houben et al. (1990)<br />
described an on-line coupling <strong>of</strong> SFE with capillary GC using a programmed temperature vaporizer<br />
as an interface. Similar approaches have been used by Blanch et al. (1994) in their investigations<br />
<strong>of</strong> rosemary leaves <strong>and</strong> by Ibanez et al. (1997) studying Spanish raspberries. In both the last two<br />
papers an <strong>of</strong>f-line procedure was applied. A different device has been used by Hartonen et al. (1992)<br />
in a study <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Thymus vulgaris using a cooled stainless steel capillary for trapping<br />
the volatiles connected via a six-port valve to the extraction vessel <strong>and</strong> the GC column. After<br />
sampling <strong>of</strong> the volatiles within the trap they have been quickly vaporized <strong>and</strong> flushed into the GC<br />
column by switching the walve. The recoveries <strong>of</strong> thyme components by SFE-GC were compared<br />
with those obtained from hydrodistilled thyme oil by GC exhibiting a good agreement. The SFE-GC<br />
analyses <strong>of</strong> several flavor <strong>and</strong> fragrance compounds <strong>of</strong> natural products by transferring the extracted<br />
compounds from a small SFE cell directly into a GC capillary has already been presented by<br />
Hawthorne et al. (1988). By inserting the extraction cell outlet restrictor (a 20 μm I.D. capillary) into<br />
the GC column through a st<strong>and</strong>ard on-column injection port, the volatiles were transferred <strong>and</strong><br />
focused within the column at 40°C, followed by rapid heating to 70°C (30°C/min) <strong>and</strong> successive<br />
usual temperature programming. The suitability <strong>of</strong> that approach has been demonstrated with a<br />
variety <strong>of</strong> samples including rosemary, thyme, cinnamon, spruce needles, orange peel, <strong>and</strong> cedar<br />
wood. In a review article from Greibrokk, published in 1995, numerous applications <strong>of</strong> SFE<br />
connected on-line with gas chromatography <strong>and</strong> other techniques, the different instruments, <strong>and</strong><br />
interfaces have been discussed, including the main parameters responsible for the quality <strong>of</strong> the<br />
obtained analytical results. In addition, the instrumental setups for SFE-LC <strong>and</strong> SFE-SFC couplings<br />
are given.<br />
2.2.3.9 Supercritical Fluid Chromatography-Gas Chromatography<br />
On-line coupling <strong>of</strong> SFC with gas chromatography has sporadically been used for the investigation<br />
<strong>of</strong> volatiles from aromatic herbs <strong>and</strong> spices. The requirements for instrumentation regarding the<br />
pumps, the restrictors, <strong>and</strong> the detectors are similar to those <strong>of</strong> SFE-GC. Additional parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
device are the separation column <strong>and</strong> the injector, to introduce the sample into the mobile phase<br />
<strong>and</strong> successively into the column. The most common injector type in SFC is the high-pressure<br />
valve injector, similar to those used in HPLC. With this valve, the sample is loaded at ambient pressure<br />
into a sample loop <strong>of</strong> defined size <strong>and</strong> can be swept into the column after switching the valve<br />
to the injection position. The separation columns used in SFC may be either packed or open tubular
History <strong>and</strong> Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research 27<br />
columns with their respective advantages <strong>and</strong> disadvantages. The latter mentioned open tubular<br />
columns for SFC can be compared with the respective GC columns; however, they must have<br />
smaller internal diameter. With regard to the detectors used in SFC, the FID is the most common<br />
applied detector, presuming that no organic modifiers have been admixed to the mobile phase.<br />
In that case, for example, a UV detector with a high-pressure flow cell has to be taken into<br />
consideration.<br />
In a paper, presented by Yamauchi et al. (1990), cold-pressed lemon-peel oil has been separated<br />
by semipreparative SFC into three fractions, namely hydrocarbons, aldehydes <strong>and</strong> alcohols, <strong>and</strong><br />
esters together with other oil constituents. The obtained fractions were afterward analyzed by<br />
capillary GC. SFC has also <strong>of</strong>ten been combined with SFE prior to chromatographic separation in<br />
plant volatile oil analysis, since in both techniques the same solvents are used, facilitating an on-line<br />
coupling. SFE <strong>and</strong> on-line-coupled SFC have been applied to the analysis <strong>of</strong> turmeric, the rhizomes<br />
<strong>of</strong> Curcuma longa L., using modified carbon dioxide as the extractant, yielding fractionation <strong>of</strong><br />
turmerones curcuminoids in a single run (Sanagi et al., 1993). A multidimensional SFC-GC system<br />
was developed by Yarita et al. (1994) to separate on-line the constituents <strong>of</strong> citrus essential oils by<br />
stepwise pressure programming. The eluting fractions were introduced into a split/splitless injector<br />
<strong>of</strong> a gas chromatograph <strong>and</strong> analyzed after cry<strong>of</strong>ocusing prior to GC separation. An SFC-GC investigation<br />
<strong>of</strong> cloudberry seed oil extracted with supercritical carbon dioxide was described by<br />
Manninen et al. (1997), in which SFC was mainly used for the separation <strong>of</strong> the volatile constituents<br />
from the low-boiling compounds, such as triacylglycerols. The volatiles were collected in a trap<br />
column <strong>and</strong> refocused before being separated by GC. Finally, an on-line technique shall be mentioned<br />
by which the compounds eluting from the SFC column can be completely transferred to GC,<br />
but also for selective or multistep heart-cutting <strong>of</strong> various sample peaks as they elute from the SFC<br />
column (Levy et al., 2005).<br />
2.2.3.10 Couplings <strong>of</strong> SFC-MS <strong>and</strong> SFC-FTIR Spectroscopy<br />
Both coupling techniques such as SFC-MS <strong>and</strong> SFC-FTIR have nearly exclusively been used for the<br />
investigation <strong>of</strong> low-volatile more polar compounds. Arpino published in 1990 a comprehensive<br />
article on the different coupling techniques in SFC-MS, which have been presented up to 1990<br />
including 247 references. A short overview <strong>of</strong> applications using SFC combined with benchtop mass<br />
spectrometers was published by Ramsey <strong>and</strong> Raynor (1996). However, the only paper concerning<br />
the application <strong>of</strong> SFC-MS in essential oil research was published by Blum et al. (1997). With the<br />
aid <strong>of</strong> a newly developed interface <strong>and</strong> an injection technique using a retention gap, investigations<br />
<strong>of</strong> thyme extracts have been successfully performed.<br />
The application <strong>of</strong> SFC-FTIR spectroscopy for the analysis <strong>of</strong> volatile compounds has also rarely<br />
been reported. One publication found in the literature refers to the characterization <strong>of</strong> varietal<br />
differences in essential oil components <strong>of</strong> hops (Auerbach et al., 2000). In that paper, the IR spectra<br />
<strong>of</strong> the main constituents were taken as films deposited on AgCl disks <strong>and</strong> compared with spectra<br />
obtained after chromatographic separation in a flow cell with IR transparent windows, exhibiting<br />
a good correlation.<br />
2.2.4 IDENTIFICATION OF MULTICOMPONENT SAMPLES WITHOUT PREVIOUS SEPARATION<br />
In addition to chromatographic separation techniques including hyphenated techniques, several<br />
spectroscopic techniques have been applied to investigate the composition <strong>of</strong> essential oils without<br />
previous separation.<br />
2.2.4.1 UV Spectroscopy<br />
UV spectroscopy has only little significance for the direct analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils due to the<br />
inability to provide uniform information on individual oil components. However, for testing the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> furano-coumarins in various citrus oils, which can cause photodermatosis when applied
28 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
externally, UV spectroscopy is the method <strong>of</strong> choice. The presence <strong>of</strong> those components can be easily<br />
determined due to their characteristic UV absorption. In the European Pharmacopoeia for example,<br />
quality assessment <strong>of</strong> lemon oil, which has to be produced by cold pressing, is therefore<br />
performed by UV spectroscopy in order to exclude cheaper distilled oils.<br />
2.2.4.2 IR Spectroscopy<br />
Several attempts have also been made to obtain information about the composition <strong>of</strong> essential oils<br />
using IR spectroscopy. One <strong>of</strong> the first comprehensive investigations <strong>of</strong> essential oils was published<br />
by Bellanato <strong>and</strong> Hidalgo (1971) in the book Infrared Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in which the IR<br />
spectra <strong>of</strong> approximately 200 essential oils <strong>and</strong> additionally <strong>of</strong> more than 50 pure reference components<br />
have been presented. However, the main disadvantage <strong>of</strong> this method is the low sensitivity<br />
<strong>and</strong> selectivity <strong>of</strong> the method in the case <strong>of</strong> mixtures with a large number <strong>of</strong> components <strong>and</strong><br />
secondly the unsolvable problem when attempting to quantitatively measure individual component<br />
concentrations.<br />
New approaches to analyze essential oils by vibrational spectroscopy using attenuated reflection<br />
(ATR) IR spectroscopy <strong>and</strong> NIR-FT-Raman spectroscopy have recently been published by Baranska<br />
et al. (2005) <strong>and</strong> numerous papers cited therein. The main components <strong>of</strong> an essential oil can be<br />
identified by both spectroscopic techniques using the spectra <strong>of</strong> pure oil constituents as references.<br />
The spectroscopic analysis is based on characteristic key b<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the individual constituents <strong>and</strong><br />
made it, for example, possible to discriminate the oil pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> several eucalyptus species. As can<br />
be taken from this paper, valuable information can be obtained as a result <strong>of</strong> the combined application<br />
<strong>of</strong> ATR-IR <strong>and</strong> NIR-FT-Raman spectroscopy. Based on reference GC measurements, valuable<br />
calibration equations have been developed for numerous essential oil plants <strong>and</strong> related essential<br />
oils in order to quantify the amount <strong>of</strong> individual oil constituents applying different suitable chemometric<br />
algorithms. Main advantages <strong>of</strong> those techniques are their ability to control the quality <strong>of</strong><br />
essential oils very fast <strong>and</strong> easily <strong>and</strong> above all, to quantify <strong>and</strong> analyze the main constituents <strong>of</strong><br />
essential oils in situ, that means in living plant tissues without any isolation process, since both<br />
techniques are not destructive.<br />
2.2.4.3 Mass Spectrometry<br />
MS <strong>and</strong> proton NMR spectroscopy have mainly been used for structure elucidation <strong>of</strong> isolated<br />
compounds. However, there are some reports on mass spectrometric analyses <strong>of</strong> essential oils. One<br />
example has been presented by Grützmacher (1982). The depicted mass spectrum (Figure 2.9) <strong>of</strong><br />
an essential oil exhibits some characteristic molecular ions <strong>of</strong> terpenoids with masses at m/z 136,<br />
148, 152, <strong>and</strong> 154. By the application <strong>of</strong> a double focusing mass spectrometer <strong>and</strong> special techniques<br />
analyzing the decay products <strong>of</strong> metastable ions, the components anethole, fenchone,<br />
borneol, <strong>and</strong> cineole could be identified, while the assignment <strong>of</strong> the mass 136 proved to be<br />
problematic.<br />
A different approach has been used by Schultze et al. (1986), investigating secondary metabolites<br />
in dried plant material by direct mass spectrometric measurement. The small samples (0.1–2 mg,<br />
depending on the kind <strong>of</strong> plant drug) were directly introduced into a mass spectrometer by means<br />
<strong>of</strong> a heatable direct probe. By heating the solid sample, stored in a small glass crucible, various<br />
substances are released depending on the applied temperature, <strong>and</strong> subsequently their mass spectra<br />
can be taken. With the aid <strong>of</strong> this technique, numerous medicinal plant drugs have been investigated<br />
<strong>and</strong> their main vaporizable components could be identified.<br />
2.2.4.4<br />
13<br />
C-NMR Spectroscopy<br />
13<br />
C-NMR spectroscopy is generally used for the elucidation <strong>of</strong> molecular structures <strong>of</strong> isolated<br />
chemical species. The application <strong>of</strong> 13 C-NMR spectroscopy to the investigation <strong>of</strong> complex<br />
mixtures is relatively rare. However, the application <strong>of</strong> 13 C-NMR spectroscopy to the analysis <strong>of</strong>
History <strong>and</strong> Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research 29<br />
100%<br />
m/z 93<br />
50<br />
m/z 121<br />
m/z 136 m/z 152<br />
m/z 148 m/z 154<br />
50 100 150<br />
m/z<br />
FIGURE 2.9 EI-mass spectrum <strong>of</strong> an essential oil. (From Grützmacher, H.F. 1982. In Ätherische Öle<br />
Analytik, Physiologie, Zusammensetzung, K.H. Kubeczka (ed.), pp. 1–24. Stuttgart, New York: Georg Thieme<br />
Verlag. With permission.)<br />
essential oils <strong>and</strong> similar complex mixtures <strong>of</strong>fers particular advantages, as have been shown in<br />
the past (Formaček <strong>and</strong> Kubeczka, 1979, 1982; Kubeczka, 2002), to confirm analytical<br />
results obtained by GC-MS <strong>and</strong> for solving certain problems encountered with nonvolatile mixture<br />
components or thermally unstable compounds, since analysis is performed at ambient<br />
temperature.<br />
The qualitative analysis <strong>of</strong> an essential oil is based on comparison <strong>of</strong> the oils spectrum, using<br />
broadb<strong>and</strong> decoupling, with spectra <strong>of</strong> pure oil constituents which should be recorded under identical<br />
conditions regarding solvent, temperature, <strong>and</strong> so on to ensure that differences in the chemical<br />
shifts for individual 13 C-NMR lines <strong>of</strong> the mixture <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the reference substance are negligible.<br />
As an example, the identification <strong>of</strong> the main constituent <strong>of</strong> celery oil is shown (Figure 2.10). This<br />
constituent can be easily identified as limonene by the corresponding reference spectrum. Minor<br />
constituents give rise to less intensive signals that can be recognized after a vertical expansion <strong>of</strong><br />
the spectrum. For recognition <strong>of</strong> those signals also a horizontal expansion <strong>of</strong> the spectrum is<br />
advantageous.<br />
The sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the 13 C-NMR technique is limited by diverse factors such as rotational sideb<strong>and</strong>s,<br />
13<br />
C- 13 C-couplings, <strong>and</strong> so on, <strong>and</strong> at least by the accumulation time. For practical use, the concentration<br />
<strong>of</strong> 0.1% <strong>of</strong> a component in the entire mixture has to be seen as an interpretable limit. A very<br />
pretentious investigation has been presented by Kubeczka (1989). In the investigated essential oil,<br />
consisting <strong>of</strong> more than 80 constituents, approximately 1200 signals were counted after a horizontal<br />
<strong>and</strong> vertical expansion in the obtained broadb<strong>and</strong> decoupled 13 C-NMR spectrum, which reflects<br />
impressively the complex composition <strong>of</strong> that oil. However, the analysis <strong>of</strong> such a complex mixture is<br />
made difficult by the immense density <strong>of</strong> individual lines, especially in the aliphatic region <strong>of</strong> the<br />
spectrum, making the assignments <strong>of</strong> lines to individual components ambiguous. Besides, qualitative<br />
analysis quantification <strong>of</strong> the individual sample components is accessible as described by Formaček<br />
<strong>and</strong> Kubeczka (1982a). After elimination <strong>of</strong> the 13 C-NMR signals <strong>of</strong> nonprotonated nuclei <strong>and</strong> calculation<br />
<strong>of</strong> average signal intensity per carbon atom as a measurement characteristic, it has been possible<br />
to obtain satisfactory results as shown by comparison with gas chromatographic analyses.
30 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Limonene<br />
Celery oil<br />
170<br />
160<br />
150<br />
140<br />
130<br />
120<br />
110<br />
100<br />
90<br />
(ppm)<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
FIGURE 2.10 Identification <strong>of</strong> limonene in celery oil by 13 C-NMR spectroscopy.<br />
During the last years, a number <strong>of</strong> articles have been published by Casanova <strong>and</strong> coworkers<br />
(e.g., Bradesi et al. (1996) <strong>and</strong> references cited therein). In addition, papers dealing with computer-aided<br />
identification <strong>of</strong> individual components <strong>of</strong> essential oils after 13 C-NMR measurements (e.g., Tomi<br />
et al., 1995), <strong>and</strong> investigations <strong>of</strong> chiral oil constituents by means <strong>of</strong> a chiral lanthanide shift<br />
reagent by carbon-13 NMR spectroscopy have been published (Ristorcelli et al., 1997).<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Adams, R.P., 1989. Identification <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> by Ion Trap Mass Spectroscopy. San Diego: Academic Press.<br />
Adams, R.P., 1995. Identifi cation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy.<br />
Carol Stream: Allured Publishing Corp.<br />
Adams, R.P., 2007. Identifi cation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry,<br />
4th ed. Carol Stream: Allured Publishing Corp.<br />
Amelunxen, F., T. Wahlig, <strong>and</strong> H. Arbeiter, 1969. Über den Nachweis des ätherischen Öls in isolierten<br />
Drüsenhaaren und Drüsenschuppen von Mentha piperita L. Z. Pfl anzenphysiol., 61: 68–72.<br />
Arpino, P., 1990. Coupling techniques in LC/MS <strong>and</strong> SFC/MS. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 337: 667–685.<br />
Arthur, C.L. <strong>and</strong> J. Pawliszyn, 1990. Solid phase microextraction with thermal desorption using fused silica<br />
optical fibres. Anal. Chem., 62: 2145–2148.<br />
Auerbach, R.H., D. Kenan, <strong>and</strong> G. Davidson, 2000. Characterization <strong>of</strong> varietal differences in essential oil<br />
components <strong>of</strong> hops (Humulus lupulus) by SFC-FTIR spectroscopy. J. AOAC Int., 83: 621–626.<br />
Baltussen, E., H.G. Janssen, P. S<strong>and</strong>ra, <strong>and</strong> C.A. Cramers, 1997. A novel type <strong>of</strong> liquid/liquid extraction for the<br />
preconcentration <strong>of</strong> organic micropollutants from aqueous samples: Application to the analysis <strong>of</strong> PAH’s<br />
<strong>and</strong> OCP’s in Water. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr., 20: 395–399.<br />
Baltussen, E., P. S<strong>and</strong>ra, F. David, <strong>and</strong> C.A. Cramers, 1999. Stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), a novel extraction<br />
technique for aqueous samples: Theory <strong>and</strong> principles. J. Microcol. Sep., 11: 737–747.<br />
Baranska, M., H. Schulz, S. Reitzenstein, U. Uhlemann, M.A. Strehle, H. Krüger, R. Quilitzsch, W. Foley, <strong>and</strong><br />
J. Popp, 2005. Vibrational spectroscopic studies to acquire a quality control method <strong>of</strong> eucalyptus essential<br />
oils. Biopolymers, 78: 237–248.
History <strong>and</strong> Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research 31<br />
Barton, D.H.R. <strong>and</strong> A.S. Lindsay, 1951. Sesquiterpenoids. Part I. Evidence for a nine-membered ring in caryophyllene.<br />
J. Chem. Soc. [London], 1951: 2988–2991.<br />
Baser, K.H.C., B. Demirci, F. Demirci, N. Kirimer, <strong>and</strong> I.C. Hedge, 2001. Microdistillation as a useful tool for<br />
the analysis <strong>of</strong> minute amounts <strong>of</strong> aromatic plant materials. Chem. Nat. Comp., 37: 336–338.<br />
Becker, H., W.C. Hsieh, <strong>and</strong> C.O. Verelis, 1981. Droplet counter-current chromatography (DCCC). Erste<br />
Erfahrungen mit einem wasserfreien Trennsystem. GIT Fachz. Labor. Supplement Chromatographie,<br />
81: 38–40.<br />
Becker, H., J. Reichling, <strong>and</strong> W.C. Hsieh, 1982. Water-free solvent system for droplet counter-current chromatography<br />
<strong>and</strong> its suitability for the separation <strong>of</strong> non-polar substances. J. Chromatogr., 237: 307–310.<br />
Bellanato, J. <strong>and</strong> A. Hidalgo, 1971. Infrared Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>. London: Heyden & Son Ltd.<br />
Belliardo, F., C. Bicchi, C. Corsero, E. Liberto, P. Rubiolo, <strong>and</strong> B. Sgorbini, 2006. Headspace-solid-phase<br />
microextraction in the analysis <strong>of</strong> the volatile fraction <strong>of</strong> aromatic <strong>and</strong> medicinal plants. J. Chromatogr.<br />
Sci., 44: 416–429.<br />
Bergström, G., 1973. Studies on natural odoriferous compounds. Chem. Scripta, 4: 135–138.<br />
Bergström, G., M. Appelgren, A.K. Borg-Karlson, I. Groth, S. Strömberg, <strong>and</strong> St. Strömberg, 1980. Studies on<br />
natural odoriferous compounds. Chem. Scripta, 16: 173–180.<br />
Bernreuther, A., J. Koziet, P. Brunerie, G. Krammer, N. Christoph, <strong>and</strong> P. Schreier, 1990. Chirospecific capillary<br />
gaschromatography (HRGC) <strong>and</strong> on-line HRGC-isotope ratio mass spectrometry <strong>of</strong> g-decalactone<br />
from various sources. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch., 191: 299–301.<br />
Berthelot, M. 1859. Ueber Camphenverbindungen. Liebigs Ann. Chem., 110: 367–368.<br />
Beyer, J., H. Becker, <strong>and</strong> R. Martin, 1986. Separation <strong>of</strong> labile terpenoids by low temperature HPLC.<br />
J. Chromatogr., 9: 2433–2441.<br />
Bicchi, C., A.D. Amato, F. David, <strong>and</strong> P. S<strong>and</strong>ra, 1987. Direct capture <strong>of</strong> volatiles emitted by living plants,<br />
Flavour Fragr. J., 2: 49–54.<br />
Bicchi, C., A. D. Amato, C. Frattini, G.M. Nano, E. Cappelletti, <strong>and</strong> R. Caniato, 1985. Analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils<br />
by direct sampling from plant secretory structures <strong>and</strong> capillary gas chromatography. J. High Resolut.<br />
Chromagtogr., 8: 431–435.<br />
Bicchi, C. <strong>and</strong> D. Joulain, 1990. Review: Headspace-gas chromatographic analysis <strong>of</strong> medicinal <strong>and</strong> aromatic<br />
plants <strong>and</strong> flowers. Flavour Fragr. J., 5: 131–145.<br />
Bicchi, C., A.D. Amato, V. Manzin, A. Galli, <strong>and</strong> M. Galli, 1996. Cyclodextrin derivatives in gas chromatographic<br />
separation <strong>of</strong> racemic mixtures <strong>of</strong> volatile compounds. X. 2,3-di-O-ethyl-6-O-tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-b-<br />
<strong>and</strong> -g-cyclodextrins. J. Chromatogr. A, 742: 161–173.<br />
Bicchi, C., A.D. Amato, G.M. Nano, <strong>and</strong> C. Frattini, 1983. Improved method for the analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils<br />
by microdistillation followed by capillary gas chromatography. J. Chromatogr., 279: 409–416.<br />
Bicchi, C., C. Cordero, C. Iori, P. Rubiolo, <strong>and</strong> P. S<strong>and</strong>ra, 2000. Headspace sorptive extraction (HSSE) in the<br />
headspace analysis <strong>of</strong> aromatic <strong>and</strong> medicinal plants. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr., 23: 539–546.<br />
Bicchi, C., C. Cordero, <strong>and</strong> P. Rubiolo, 2000. Influence <strong>of</strong> fibre coating in headspace solid-phase microextraction-gas<br />
chromatographic analysis <strong>of</strong> aromatic <strong>and</strong> medicinal plants. J. Chromatogr. A, 892:<br />
469–485.<br />
Bicchi, C., C. Frattini, G. Pellegrino, P. Rubiolo, V. Raverdino, <strong>and</strong> G. Tsoupras, 1992. Determination <strong>of</strong><br />
sulphurated compounds in Tagetes patula cv. nana essential oil by gas chromatography with mass spectrometric,<br />
Fourier transform infared <strong>and</strong> atomic emission spectrometric detection. J. Chromatogr.,<br />
609: 305–313.<br />
Bicchi, C., V. Manzin, A.D. Amato, <strong>and</strong> P. Rubiolo, 1995. Cyclodextrin derivatives in GC separation <strong>of</strong><br />
enantiomers <strong>of</strong> essential oil, aroma <strong>and</strong> flavour compounds. Flavour Fragr. J., 10: 127–137.<br />
Bicchi, C. <strong>and</strong> P. S<strong>and</strong>ra, 1987. Microtechniques in essential oil analysis. In Capillary Gas Chromatography in<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> Oil Analysis, P. S<strong>and</strong>ra <strong>and</strong> C. Bicchi (eds), pp. 85–122. Heidelberg, Basel, New York: Alfred<br />
Huethig Verlag.<br />
Blanch, G.P., E. Ibanez, M. Herraiz, <strong>and</strong> G. Reglero, 1994. Use <strong>of</strong> a programmed temperature vaporizer for<br />
<strong>of</strong>f-line SFE/GC analysis in food composition studies. Anal. Chem., 66: 888–892.<br />
Blum, C., K.H. Kubeczka, <strong>and</strong> K. Becker, 1997. Supercritical fluid chromatography-mass spectrometry <strong>of</strong><br />
thyme extracts (Thymus vulgaris L.). J. Chromatogr. A, 773: 377–380.<br />
Bos, R., A.P. Bruins, <strong>and</strong> H. Hendriks, 1982. Negative ion chemical ionization, a new important tool in the<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils. In Ätherische Öle, Analytik, Physiologie, Zusammensetzung, K.H. Kubeczka<br />
(ed.), pp. 25–32. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag.<br />
Bos, R., H.J. Woerdenbag, H. Hendriks, J.H. Zwaving, P.A.G.M. De Smet, G. Tittel, H.V. Wikström, <strong>and</strong> J.J.C.<br />
Scheffer, 1996. Analytical aspects <strong>of</strong> phytotherapeutic valerian preparations. Phytochem. Anal.,<br />
7: 143–151.
32 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Bourne, S., A.M. Haefner, K.L. Norton, <strong>and</strong> P.R. Griffiths, 1990. Performance characteristics <strong>of</strong> a real-time<br />
direct deposition gas chromatography/Fourier transform infrared system. Anal. Chem., 62: 2448–2452.<br />
Bradesi, P., A. Bighelli, F. Tomi, <strong>and</strong> J. Casanova, 1996. L’analyse des mélanges complexes par RMN du<br />
Carbone-13—Partie I et II. C<strong>and</strong>. J. Appl. Spectros., 11: 15–24, 41–50.<br />
Braunsdorf, R., U. Hener, <strong>and</strong> A. Mos<strong>and</strong>l, 1992. Analytische Differenzierung zwischen natürlich gewachsenen,<br />
fermentativ erzeugten und synthetischen (naturidentischen) Aromast<strong>of</strong>fen II. Mitt.: GC-C-IRMS-Analyse<br />
aromarelevanter Aldehyde—Grundlagen und Anwendungsbeispiele. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch.,<br />
194: 426–430.<br />
Braunsdorf, R, U. Hener, S. Stein, <strong>and</strong> A. Mos<strong>and</strong>l, 1993. Comprehensive cGC-IRMS analysis in the authenticy<br />
control <strong>of</strong> flavours <strong>and</strong> essential oils. Part I: Lemon oil. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch., 197: 137–141.<br />
Briechle, R., W. Dammertz, R. Guth, <strong>and</strong> W. Volmer, 1997. Bestimmung ätherischer Öle in Drogen. GIT Lab.<br />
Fachz., 41: 749–753.<br />
Bruins, A.P., 1987. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry <strong>of</strong> essential oils, Part II: Positive ion <strong>and</strong> negative<br />
ion chemical ionization techniques. In Capillary Gas Chromatography in <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Analysis,<br />
P. S<strong>and</strong>ra <strong>and</strong> C. Bicchi (eds), pp. 329–357. Heidelberg: Dr. A. Huethig Verlag.<br />
Bruno, S., 1961. La chromatografia in phase vapore nell´identificazione di alcuni olii essenziali in materiali<br />
biologici. Farmaco, 16: 481–186.<br />
Buttery, R.G., W.H. McFadden, R. Teranishi, M.P. Kealy, <strong>and</strong> T.R. Mon, 1963. Constituents <strong>of</strong> hop oil. Nature,<br />
200: 435–436.<br />
Carle, R., I. Fleischhauer, J. Beyer, <strong>and</strong> E. Reinhard, 1990. Studies on the origin <strong>of</strong> (−)-a-bisabolol <strong>and</strong> chamazulene<br />
in chamomile preparations; Part I. Investigations by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS).<br />
Planta Medica, 56: 456–460.<br />
Cazaussus, A., R. Pes, N. Sellier, <strong>and</strong> J.C. Tabet, 1988. GC-MS <strong>and</strong> GC-MS-MS analysis <strong>of</strong> a complex essential<br />
oil. Chromatographia, 25: 865–869.<br />
Chaintreau, A., 2001. Simultaneous distillation–extraction: From birth to maturity—review. Flavour Frag. J.,<br />
16: 136–148.<br />
Chamblee, T.S., B.C. Clark, T. Radford, <strong>and</strong> G.A. Iacobucci, 1985. General method for the high-performance<br />
liquid chromatographic prefractionation <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> flavor mixtures for gas chromatographicmass<br />
spectrometric analysis: Identification <strong>of</strong> new constituents in cold pressed lime oil. J. Chromatogr.,<br />
330: 141–151.<br />
Chester T.L. <strong>and</strong> D.P. Innis, 1986. Separation <strong>of</strong> oligo-<strong>and</strong> polysaccharides by capillary supercritical fluid chromatography,<br />
J. High Resolut. Chromatogr., 9: 209–212.<br />
Chialva, F., G. Gabri, P.A.P. Liddle, <strong>and</strong> F. Ulian, 1982. Qualitative evaluation <strong>of</strong> aromatic herbs by direct<br />
headspace GC analysis. Application <strong>of</strong> the method <strong>and</strong> comparison with the traditional analysis <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oils. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr., 5: 182–188.<br />
Clevenger, J.F., 1928. Apparatus for the determination <strong>of</strong> volatile oil. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc., 17: 345–349.<br />
Cocking, T.T. <strong>and</strong> G. Middleton, 1935. Improved method for the estimation <strong>of</strong> the essential oil content <strong>of</strong> drugs.<br />
Quart. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 8: 435–442.<br />
Cole, R.A., 1980. The use <strong>of</strong> porous polymers for the collection <strong>of</strong> plant volatiles. J. Sci. Food Agric.,<br />
31: 1242–1249.<br />
Conway, W.D., 1989. Countercurrent Chromatography—Apparatus, Theory, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Applications</strong>. New York:<br />
VCH Inc.<br />
Cramers, C.A., H.G. Janssen, M.M. van Deursen, <strong>and</strong> P.A. Leclercq, 1999. High speed gas chromatography:<br />
An overview <strong>of</strong> various concepts. J. Chromatogr. A, 856: 315–329.<br />
Craveiro, A.A., F.J.A. Matos, J. Alencar, <strong>and</strong> M.M. Plumel, 1989. Microwave oven extraction <strong>of</strong> an essential<br />
oil. Flavour Frag. J., 4: 43–44.<br />
David, F. <strong>and</strong> P. S<strong>and</strong>ra, 1992. Capillary gas chromatography-spectroscopic techniques in natural product analysis.<br />
Phytochem. Anal., 3: 145–152.<br />
David, F. <strong>and</strong> P. S<strong>and</strong>ra, 2007. Review: Stir bar sorptive extraction for trace analysis. J. Chromatogr. A,<br />
1152: 54–69.<br />
Debrunner, B., M. Neuenschw<strong>and</strong>er, <strong>and</strong> R. Benneisen, 1995. Sesquiterpenes <strong>of</strong> Petasites hybridus (L.) G.M.<br />
et Sch.: Distribution <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenes over plant organs. Pharmaceut. Acta Helv., 70: 167–173.<br />
Dietrich, A., B. Maas, V. Karl, P. Kreis, D. Lehmann, B. Weber, <strong>and</strong> A. Mos<strong>and</strong>l, 1992. Stereoisomeric flavour<br />
compounds, part LV: Stereodifferentiation <strong>of</strong> some chiral volatiles on heptakis (2,3-di-O-acetyl-6-O-tertbutyl-dimethylsilyl)-b-cyclodextrin.<br />
J. High Resolut. Chromatogr., 15: 176–179.<br />
Dietrich, A., B. Maas, B. Messer, G. Bruche, V. Karl, A. Kaunzinger, <strong>and</strong> A. Mos<strong>and</strong>l, 1992a. Stereoisomeric<br />
flavour compounds, part LVIII: The use <strong>of</strong> heptakis (2,3-di-O-methyl-6-O-tert-butyl-dimethylsilyl)-<br />
b-cyclodextrin as a chiral stationary phase in flavor analysis. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr., 15: 590–593.
History <strong>and</strong> Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research 33<br />
Dugo, P., G. Dugo, <strong>and</strong> L. Mondello, 2003. On-line coupled LC-GC: Theory <strong>and</strong> applications. LC.GC Europe,<br />
16(12a): 35–43.<br />
Dugo, G., P.Q. Tranchida, A. Cotroneo, P. Dugo, I. Bonaccorsi, P. Marriott, R. Shellie, <strong>and</strong> L. Mondello, 2005.<br />
Advanced <strong>and</strong> innovative chromatographic techniques for the study <strong>of</strong> citrus essential oils. Flavour<br />
Fragr. J., 20: 249–264.<br />
Dugo, G., A. Verzera, A. Cotroneo, I.S. d’Alcontres, L. Mondllo, <strong>and</strong> K.D. Bartle, 1994. Automated HPLC-<br />
HRGC: A powerful method for essential oil analysis. Part II. Determination <strong>of</strong> the enantiomeric distribution<br />
<strong>of</strong> linalol in sweet orange, bitter orange <strong>and</strong> m<strong>and</strong>arin essential oils. Flavour Fragr. J., 9: 99–104.<br />
Dumas, M.J., 1833. Ueber die vegetabilischen Substanzen welche sich dem Kampfer nähern, und über einig<br />
ätherischen Öle. Ann. Pharmacie, 6: 245–258.<br />
Fischer, N., S. Nitz, <strong>and</strong> F. Drawert, 1987. Original flavour compounds <strong>and</strong> the essential oil composition <strong>of</strong><br />
Marjoram (Majorana hortensis Moench). Flavour. Frag. J., 2: 55–61.<br />
Formaček, V. <strong>and</strong> K.H. Kubeczka, 1979. Application <strong>of</strong> 13C-NMR-spectroscopy in analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils.<br />
In Vorkommen und Analytik ätherischer Öle, K. H. Kubeczka (ed.), pp. 130–138. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme<br />
Verlag.<br />
Formaček, V. <strong>and</strong> K.H. Kubeczka, 1982. 13C-NMR analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils. In Aromatic Plants: Basic <strong>and</strong><br />
Applied Aspects, N. Margaris, A. Koedam, <strong>and</strong> D. Vokou (eds), pp. 177–181. The Hague, Boston, London:<br />
Martinus Nijh<strong>of</strong>f Publishers.<br />
Formaček, V. <strong>and</strong> K.H. Kubeczka, 1982a. Quantitative analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils by 13C-NMR-spectroscopy.<br />
In Ätherische Öle: Analytik, Physiologie, Zusammensetzung, K.H. Kubeczka (ed.), 42–53. Stuttgart,<br />
New York: Georg Thieme Verlag.<br />
Frank, C., A. Dietrich, U. Kremer, <strong>and</strong> A. Mos<strong>and</strong>l, 1995. GC-IRMS in the authenticy control <strong>of</strong> the essential<br />
oil <strong>of</strong> Cori<strong>and</strong>rum sativum L. J. Agric. Food Chem., 43: 1634–1637.<br />
Frérot, E. <strong>and</strong> E. Decorzant 2004. Quantification <strong>of</strong> total furocoumarins in citrus oils by HPLC couple with UV<br />
fluorescence, <strong>and</strong> mass detection. J. Agric. Food Chem., 52: 6879–6886.<br />
Friedel, H.D. <strong>and</strong> R. Matusch, 1987. Separation <strong>of</strong> non-polar sesquiterpene olefins from Tolu balsam by highperformance<br />
liquid chromatography; silver perchlorate impregnation <strong>of</strong> prepacked preparative silica gel<br />
column. J. Chromatogr., 407: 343–348.<br />
Gaedcke, F. <strong>and</strong> B. Steinh<strong>of</strong>f, 2000. Phytopharmaka. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft,<br />
Fig. 1.7.<br />
Geiss, F., 1987. Fundamentals <strong>of</strong> Thin-Layer Chromatography. Heidelberg: Hüthig Verlag.<br />
Gießelmann, G. <strong>and</strong> K.H. Kubeczka, 1993. A new procedure for the enrichment <strong>of</strong> headspace constituents<br />
versus conventional hydrodistillation. Poster presented at the 24th International Symposium on <strong>Essential</strong><br />
<strong>Oils</strong>, Berlin.<br />
Gil-Av, E., B. Feibush, <strong>and</strong> R. Charles-Sigler, 1965. In Gas Chromatography 1966, A.B. Littlewood (ed.),<br />
p. 227. London: Institute <strong>of</strong> Petroleum.<br />
Gildemeister, E. <strong>and</strong> F. H<strong>of</strong>fmann, 1956. In Die ätherischen Öle, W. Treibs (ed.), Vol. 1, p. 14. Berlin: Akademie-<br />
Verlag.<br />
Godefroot, M., P. S<strong>and</strong>ra, <strong>and</strong> M. Verzele, 1981. New method for quantitative essential oil analysis.<br />
J. Chromatogr., 203: 325–335.<br />
Godefroot, M., M. Stechele, P. S<strong>and</strong>ra, <strong>and</strong> M. Verzele, 1982. A new method fort the quantitative analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
organochlorine pesticides <strong>and</strong> polychlorinated biphenyls. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr., 5: 75–79.<br />
Greibrokk, T., 1995. Review: <strong>Applications</strong> <strong>of</strong> supercritical fluid extraction in multidimensional systems.<br />
J. Chromatogr. A, 703: 523–536.<br />
Grob, K. <strong>and</strong> F. Zürcher, 1976. Stripping <strong>of</strong> trace organic substances from water; equipment <strong>and</strong> procedure.<br />
J. Chromatogr., 117: 285–294.<br />
Grützmacher, H.F., 1982. Mixture analysis by new mass spectrometric techniques—a survey. In Ätherische<br />
Öle: Analytik, Physiologie, Zusammensetzung, K.H. Kubeczka (ed.), pp. 1–24. Stuttgart, New York:<br />
Georg Thieme Verlag.<br />
Hartonen, K., M. Jussila, P. Manninen, <strong>and</strong> M.L. Riekkola, 1992. Volatile oil analysis <strong>of</strong> Thymus vulgaris L. by<br />
directly coupled SFE/GC. J. Microcol. Sep., 4: 3–7.<br />
Hawthorne, S.B., M.S. Krieger, <strong>and</strong> D.J. Miller, 1988. Analysis <strong>of</strong> flavor <strong>and</strong> fragrance compounds using supercritical<br />
fluid extraction coupled with gas chromatography. Anal. Chem., 60: 472–477.<br />
Hefendehl, F.W., 1966. Isolierung ätherischer Öle aus äußeren Pflanzendrüsen. Naturw., 53: 142.<br />
Henderson, W., J.W. Hart, P. How, <strong>and</strong> J. Judge, 1970. Chemical <strong>and</strong> morphological studies on sites <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpene<br />
accumulation in Pogostemon cablin (Patchouli). Phytochemistry, 9: 1219–1228.<br />
Hener, U., 1990. Chirale Aromast<strong>of</strong>fe—Beiträge zur Struktur, Wirkung und Analytik. Dissertation, Goethe-<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
34 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Herres, W., 1987. HRGC-FTIR: Capillary Gas Chromatography-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy.<br />
Heidelberg: Alfred Huethig Verlag.<br />
Herres, W., K.H. Kubezka, <strong>and</strong> W. Schultze, 1986. HRGC-FTIR investigations on volatile terpenes. In Progress<br />
in <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research, E.J. Brunke (ed.), pp. 507–528. Berlin: W. de Gruyter.<br />
Hör, K., C. Ruff, B. Weckerle, T. König, <strong>and</strong> P. Schreier, 2001. 2 H/ 1 H ratio analysis <strong>of</strong> flavor compounds by<br />
on-line gas chromatography-pyrolysis-isotope ratio mass spectrometry (HRGC-P-IRMS): Citral. Flavour<br />
Frag. J., 16: 344–348.<br />
Houben, R.J., H.G.M. Janssen, P.A. Leclercq, J.A. Rijks, <strong>and</strong> C.A. Cramers, 1990. Supercritical fluid extraction-capillary<br />
gas chromatography: On-Line coupling with a programmed temperature vaporizer. J. High<br />
Resolut. Chromatogr., 13: 669–673.<br />
Ibanez, E., S. Lopez-Sebastian, E. Ramos, J. Tabera, <strong>and</strong> G. Reglero, 1997. Analysis <strong>of</strong> highly volatile components<br />
<strong>of</strong> foods by <strong>of</strong>f-line SFE/GC. J. Agric. Food Chem., 45: 3940–3943.<br />
Ito, Y., M.A. Weinstein, I. Aoki, R. Harada, E. Kimura, <strong>and</strong> K. Nunogaki, 1966. The coil planet centrifuge.<br />
Nature, 212: 985–987.<br />
Jennings, W.G., 1979. Vapor-phase sampling. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr., 2: 221–224.<br />
Jennings, W., 1981. Recent developments in high resolution gas chromatography. In Flavour ¢81, P. Schreier<br />
(ed.), pp. 233–251. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter & Co.<br />
Jennings, W. <strong>and</strong> T. Shibamoto, 1980. Qualitative Analysis <strong>of</strong> Flavor <strong>and</strong> Fragrance Volatiles by Glass Capillary<br />
Gas Chromatography. New York: Academic Press.<br />
Jirovetz, L., G. Buchbauer, W. Jäger, A. Woidich, <strong>and</strong> A. Nikiforov, 1992. Analysis <strong>of</strong> fragrance compounds in<br />
blood samples <strong>of</strong> mice by gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, GC/FTIR <strong>and</strong> GC/AES after inhalation<br />
<strong>of</strong> s<strong>and</strong>elwood oil. Biomed. Chromatogr., 6: 133–134.<br />
Joulain, D., 1987. The composition <strong>of</strong> the headspace from fragrant flowers: Further results. Flavour Frag. J.,<br />
2: 149–155.<br />
Joulain, D. <strong>and</strong> W.A. König, 1998. The Atlas <strong>of</strong> Spectral Data <strong>of</strong> Sesquiterpene Hydrocarbons. Hamburg: E. B.<br />
Verlag.<br />
Juchelka, D., T. Beck, U. Hener, F. Dettmar, <strong>and</strong> A. Mos<strong>and</strong>l, 1998. Multidimensional gas chromatography<br />
coupled on-line with isotope ratio mass spectrometry (MDGC-IRMS): Progress in the analytical authentication<br />
<strong>of</strong> genuine flavor components. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr., 21: 145–151.<br />
Kaiser, R., 1976. Einführung in die Hochleistungs-Dünnschicht-Chromatographie. Bad Dürkheim: Institut für<br />
Chromatographie.<br />
Kaiser, R., 1993. The Scent <strong>of</strong> Orchids—Olfactory <strong>and</strong> Chemical Investigations. Amsterdam: Elsevier <strong>Science</strong><br />
Ltd.<br />
Kaiser, H. <strong>and</strong> W. Lang, 1951. Ueber die Bestimmung des ätherischen Oels in Drogen. Dtsch. Apoth. Ztg.,<br />
91: 163–166.<br />
Kolb, B. <strong>and</strong> L.S. Ettre, 1997. Static Headspace-Gas Chromatography: Theory <strong>and</strong> Practice. New York:<br />
Wiley.<br />
Kolb, B. <strong>and</strong> L.S. Ettre, 2006. Static Headspace-Gas Chromatography: Theory <strong>and</strong> Practice, 2nd ed. New York:<br />
Wiley.<br />
Kolb, B. <strong>and</strong> B. Liebhardt, 1986. Cry<strong>of</strong>ocusing in the combination <strong>of</strong> gas chromatography with equilibrium<br />
headspace sampling. Chromatographia, 21: 305–311.<br />
Komae, H. <strong>and</strong> N. Hayashi, 1975. Separation <strong>of</strong> essential oils by liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr.,<br />
114: 258–260.<br />
Köng, W.A., D. Icheln, T. Runge, I. Pforr, <strong>and</strong> A. Krebs, 1990. Cyclodextrins as chiral stationary phases in<br />
capillary gas chromatography. Part VII: Cyclodextrins with an inverse substitution pattern—synthesis<br />
<strong>and</strong> enantioselectivity. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr., 13: 702–707.<br />
König, W.A., P. Evers, R. Krebber, S. Schulz, C. Fehr, <strong>and</strong> G. Ohl<strong>of</strong>f, 1989. Determination <strong>of</strong> the absolute<br />
configuration <strong>of</strong> a-damascenone <strong>and</strong> a-ionone from black tea by enantioselective capillary gas chromatography.<br />
Tetrahedron, 45: 7003–7006.<br />
König, W.A., B. Gehrcke, D. Icheln, P. Evers, J. Dönnecke, <strong>and</strong> W. Wang, 1992. New, selectively substituted<br />
cyclodextrins as stationary phases for the analysis <strong>of</strong> chiral constituents <strong>of</strong> essential oils. J. High Resolut.<br />
Chromatogr., 15: 367–372.<br />
König, W.A., D. Icheln, T. Runge, P. Evers, B. Gehrcke, <strong>and</strong> A. Krüger, 1992a. Enantioselective gas chromatography—a<br />
new dimension in the analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils. In Proc. 12th Int. Congr. <strong>of</strong> Flavours,<br />
Fragrances <strong>and</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, H. Woidich <strong>and</strong> G. Buchbauer (eds), pp. 177–186. Vienna: Austrian<br />
Assoc. <strong>of</strong> Flavour <strong>and</strong> Fragr. Industry.<br />
König, W.A., S. Lutz, <strong>and</strong> G. Wenz, 1988b. Modified cyclodextrins—novel, highly enantioselective stationary<br />
phases for gas chromatography. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 27: 979–980.
History <strong>and</strong> Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research 35<br />
König, W.A., S. Lutz, P. Mischnick-Lübbecke, B. Brassat, <strong>and</strong> G. Wenz, 1988a. Cyclodextrins as chiral stationary<br />
phases in capillary gas chromatography I. Pentylated a-cyclodextrin. J. Chromatogr., 447:<br />
193–197.<br />
König, W.A., S. Lutz, G. Wenz, <strong>and</strong> E. van der Bey, 1988c. Cyclodextrins as chiral stationary phases in capillary<br />
gas chromatography II. Heptakis (3-O-acetyl-2,6-di-O-pentyl)-b-cyclodextrin. J. High Resolut.<br />
Chromatogr. Chromatogr. Commun., 11: 506–509.<br />
König, W.A., A. Rieck, C. Fricke, S. Melching, Y. Saritas, <strong>and</strong> I.H. Hardt, 1995. In Proc. 13th Int. Congr. <strong>of</strong><br />
Flavours, Fragrances <strong>and</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, K.H.C. Baser (ed.), vol. 2, pp. 169–180. Istanbul: AREP<br />
Publ.<br />
König, W.A., A. Rieck, I. Hardt, B. Gehrcke, K.H. Kubeczka, <strong>and</strong> H. Muhle, 1994. Enantiomeric composition<br />
<strong>of</strong> the chiral constituents <strong>of</strong> esssential oils Part 2: Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons. J. High Resolut.<br />
Chromatogr., 17: 315–320.<br />
Kreis, P. <strong>and</strong> A. Mos<strong>and</strong>l, 1992. Chiral compounds <strong>of</strong> essential oils XI. Simultaneous stereoanalysis <strong>of</strong> lav<strong>and</strong>ula<br />
oil constituents. Flavour Frag. J., 7: 187–193.<br />
Kubeczka, K.H., 1967. Vorrichtung zur Isolierung, Anreicherung und chemischen Charakterisierung gaschromatographisch<br />
getrennter Komponenten im μg-Bereich. J. Chromatogr., 31: 319–325.<br />
Kubeczka, K.H., 1973. Separation <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> similar complex mixtures by means <strong>of</strong> modified<br />
dry-column chromatography, Chromatographia, 6: 106–108.<br />
Kubeczka, K.H., 1981a. St<strong>and</strong>ardization <strong>and</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils. In A Perspective <strong>of</strong> the Perfumes <strong>and</strong><br />
Flavours Industry in India, S. Jain (ed.), pp. 105–120. New Delhi: Perfumes <strong>and</strong> Flavours Association <strong>of</strong><br />
India.<br />
Kubeczka, K.H., 1981b. Application <strong>of</strong> HPLC for the separation <strong>of</strong> flavour compounds. In Flavour 81,<br />
P. Schreier (ed.), pp. 345–359. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter & Co.<br />
Kubeczka, K.H., 1985. Progress in isolation techniques for essential oil constituents. In Advances in Medicinal<br />
Plant Research, A.J. Vlietinck <strong>and</strong> R.A. Dommisse (eds), pp. 197–224. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche<br />
Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.<br />
Kubeczka, K.H., 1989. Studies on complex mixtures: Combined separation techniques versus unprocessed<br />
sample analysis. In Moderne Tecniche in Fitochimica, C. Bicchi <strong>and</strong> C. Frattini (eds), pp. 53–68. Firenze:<br />
Società Italiana di Fitochimica.<br />
Kubeczka, K.H., 1991. New methods in essential oil analysis. In Conferencias Plenarias de la XXIII Reunión<br />
Bienal de Quimica, A. San Feliciano, M. Gr<strong>and</strong>e <strong>and</strong> J. Casado (eds), pp. 169–184. Salamanca:<br />
Universidad de Salamanca, Sección local e la R.S.E.Q.<br />
Kubeczka, K.H., 1996. Unpublished results.<br />
Kubeczka, K.H., 1997a. New approaches in essential oil analysis using polymer-coated silica fibers. In <strong>Essential</strong><br />
<strong>Oils</strong>: Basic <strong>and</strong> Applied Research, Ch. Franz, A. Máthé <strong>and</strong> G. Buchbauer (eds), pp. 139–146. Carol<br />
Stream, IL: Allured Publishing Corp.<br />
Kubeczka, K.-H. 1997b. <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Symposium Proceedings, p. 145.<br />
Kubeczka, K.-H., 2002. <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> Analysis by Capillary Gas Chromatography <strong>and</strong> Carbon-13 NMR<br />
Spectroscopy, 2nd completely rev. ed. Baffins Lane: Wiley.<br />
Kubeczka, K.H. <strong>and</strong> G. Gießelmann, 1995. Application <strong>of</strong> a new micro hydrodistillation device for the investigation<br />
<strong>of</strong> aromatic plant drugs. Poster presented at the 43th Annual Congress on Medicinal Plant<br />
Research, Halle, Germany.<br />
Kubeczka, K.H., W. Schultze, S. Ebel, <strong>and</strong> M. Wey<strong>and</strong>t-Spangenberg, 1989. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der<br />
GC-Molekülspektoskopie-Kopplungen. In Instrumentalized Analytical Chemistry <strong>and</strong> Computer<br />
<strong>Technology</strong>, W. Günther <strong>and</strong> J.P. Matthes (eds), pp. 131–141. Darmstadt: GIT Verlag.<br />
Lancas, F., F. David, <strong>and</strong> P. S<strong>and</strong>ra, 1988. CGC analysis <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> citrus fruits on 100 μm i.d.<br />
columns. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr., 11: 73–75.<br />
Lawrence, B.M., 1995. The isolation <strong>of</strong> aromatic materials from natural plant products. In Manual <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> Oil Industry, K. Tuley De Silva (ed.), pp. 57–154. Vienna: UNIDO.<br />
Levy, J.M., J.P. Guzowski, <strong>and</strong> W.E. Huhak, 2005. On-line multidimensional supercritical fluid chromatography/<br />
capillary gas chromatography. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr., 10: 337–341.<br />
Lucchesi, M.E., F. Chemat, <strong>and</strong> J. Smadja, 2004. Solvent-free microwave extraction <strong>of</strong> essential oil from<br />
aromatic herbs: Comparison with conventional hydro-distillation. J. Chromatogr. A, 1043: 323–327.<br />
Malingré, T.M., D. Smith, <strong>and</strong> S. Batterman, 1969. De Isolering en Gaschromatografische Analyse van de<br />
Vluchtige Olie uit Afzonderlijke Klierharen van het Labiatentype. Pharm. Weekblad, 104: 429.<br />
Manninen, P. <strong>and</strong> H. Kallio, 1997. Supercritical fluid chromatography-gas chromatography <strong>of</strong> volatiles in<br />
cloudberry (Rubus chamaemorus) oil extracted with supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Chromatogr. A,<br />
787: 276–282.
36 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Manninen, P., M.L. Riekkola, Y. Holm, <strong>and</strong> R. Hiltunen, 1990. SFC in analysis <strong>of</strong> aromatic plants. J. High<br />
Resolut. Chromatogr., 13: 167–169.<br />
MassFinder 2007. MassFinder S<strong>of</strong>tware, Version 3.7. Hamburg: Dr. Hochmuth Scientific Consulting.<br />
Matthews, D.E. <strong>and</strong> J.M. Hayes, 1978. Isotope-ratio-monitoring gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal.<br />
Chem., 50: 1465–1473.<br />
McKone, H.T., 1979. High performance liquid chromatography. J. Chem. Educ., 56: 807–809.<br />
Mechler, E. <strong>and</strong> K.A. Kovar, 1977. Vergleichende Bestimmungen des ätherischen Öls in Drogen nach dem<br />
Europäischen und dem Deutschen Arzneibuch. Dtsch. Apoth. Ztg., 117: 1019–1023.<br />
Meerwein, H. 1914. Über den Reaktionsmechanismus der Umw<strong>and</strong>lung von Borneol in Camphen. Liebigs<br />
Ann.Chem., 405: 129–175.<br />
Miller, J.M. <strong>and</strong> J.G. Kirchner, 1952. Some improvements in chromatographic techniques for terpenes. Anal.<br />
Chem., 24: 1480–1482.<br />
Modey, W.K., D.A. Mulholl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> M.W. Raynor, 1995. Analytical supercritical extraction <strong>of</strong> natural products.<br />
Phytochem. Anal., 7: 1–15.<br />
Mondello, L., K.D. Bartle, G. Dugo, <strong>and</strong> P. Dugo, 1994a. Automated HPLC-HRGC: A powerful method for<br />
essential oil analysis Part III. Aliphatic <strong>and</strong> terpene aldehydes <strong>of</strong> orange oil. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr.,<br />
17: 312–314.<br />
Mondello, L., K.D. Bartle, P. Dugo, P. Gans, <strong>and</strong> G. Dugo, 1994b. Automated HPLC-HRGC: A powerful<br />
method for essential oils analysis. Part IV. Coupled LC-GC-MS (ITD) for bergamot oil analysis.<br />
J. Microcol. Sep., 6: 237–244.<br />
Mondello, L., P. Dugo, K.D. Bartle, G. Dugo, <strong>and</strong> A. Cotroneo, 1995. Automated LC-GC: A powerful method<br />
for essential oils analysis Part V. Identification <strong>of</strong> terpene hydrocarbons <strong>of</strong> bergamot, lemon, m<strong>and</strong>arin,<br />
sweet orange, bitter orange, grapefruit, clementine <strong>and</strong> Mexican lime oils by coupled HPLC-HRGC-<br />
MS(ITD). Flavour Fragr. J., 10: 33–42.<br />
Mondello, L., G. Dugo, <strong>and</strong> K.D. Bartle, 1996. On-line microbore high performance liquid chromatographycapillary<br />
gas chromatography for food <strong>and</strong> water analyses. A review. J. Microcol. Sep., 8: 275–310.<br />
Mondello, L., P. Dugo, G. Dugo, A.C. Lewis, <strong>and</strong> K.D. Bartle, 1999. Review: High-performance liquid chromatography<br />
coupled on-line with high resolution gas chromatography, State <strong>of</strong> the art. J. Chromatogr. A,<br />
842: 373–390.<br />
Mondello, L., R. Shellie, A. Casilli, P. Marriott, <strong>and</strong> G. Dugo, 2004. Ultra-fast essential oil characterization by<br />
capillary GC on a 50 μm ID column. J. Sep. Sci., 27: 699–702.<br />
Mondello, L., G. Zappia, G. Errante, P. Dugo, <strong>and</strong> G. Dugo, 2000. Fast-GC <strong>and</strong> Fast-GC/MS for the analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> natural complex matrices. LC.GC Europe, 13: 495–502.<br />
Morita, M., S. Mihashi, H. Itokawa, <strong>and</strong> S. Hara, 1983. Silver nitrate impregnation <strong>of</strong> preparative silica gel<br />
columns for liquid chromatography. Anal. Chem., 55: 412–414.<br />
Mos<strong>and</strong>l, A. 2004. Authenticity assessment: A permanent challenge in food flavor <strong>and</strong> essential oil analysis.<br />
J. Chromatogr. Sci., 42: 440–449.<br />
Mos<strong>and</strong>l, A. <strong>and</strong> D. Juchelka, 1997. Advances in authenticity assessment <strong>of</strong> citrus oils. J. Essent. Oil Res.,<br />
9: 5–12.<br />
Munari, F., G. Dugo, <strong>and</strong> A. Cotroneo, 1990. Automated on-line HPLC-HRGC with gradient elution <strong>and</strong> multiple<br />
GC transfer applied to the characterization <strong>of</strong> citrus essential oils. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr.,<br />
13: 56–61.<br />
Nickerson, G. <strong>and</strong> S. Likens, 1966. Gas chromatographic evidence for the occurrence <strong>of</strong> hop oil components in<br />
beer. J. Chromatogr., 21: 1–5.<br />
Nishii, Y., T. Yoshida, <strong>and</strong> Y. Tanabe, 1997. Enantiomeric resolution <strong>of</strong> a germacrene-D derivative by chiral<br />
high-performance liquid chromatography. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem., 61: 547–548.<br />
NIST/EPA/NIH Mass Spectral Library 2005, Version: NIST 05. Mass Spectrometry Data Center. Gaithersburg:<br />
National Institute <strong>of</strong> St<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong>.<br />
Novak, J., V. Vašak, <strong>and</strong> J. Janak, 1965. Chromatographic method for the concentration <strong>of</strong> trace impurities in<br />
the atmosphere <strong>and</strong> other gases. Anal. Chem., 37: 660–666.<br />
Nyiredy, Sz., 2003. Progress in forced-flow planar chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A, 1000: 985–999.<br />
Pawliszyn, J., 1997. Solid Phase Microextraction Theory <strong>and</strong> Practice. New York: Wiley-VCH Inc.<br />
Pettei, M.J., F.G. Pilkiewicz, <strong>and</strong> K. Nakanishi, 1977. Preparative liquid chromatography applied to difficult<br />
separations. Tet. Lett., 24: 2083–2086.<br />
Pourmortazavi, S.M. <strong>and</strong> S.S. Hajimirsadeghi, 2007. Review: Supercritical fluid extraction in plant essential<br />
<strong>and</strong> volatile oil analysis. J. Chromatogr. A, 1163: 2–24.<br />
Prasad, R.S., A.S. Gupta, <strong>and</strong> S. Dev, 1947. Chromatography <strong>of</strong> organic compounds III. Improved procedure<br />
for the thin-layer chromatography <strong>of</strong> olefins on silver ion-silica gel layers. J. Chromatogr., 92: 450–453.
History <strong>and</strong> Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research 37<br />
Ramsey, E.D. <strong>and</strong> M.W. Raynor, 1996. Electron ionization <strong>and</strong> chemical ionization sensitivity studies involving<br />
capillary supercritical fluid chromatography combined with benchtop mass spectrometry. Anal.<br />
Commun., 33: 95–97.<br />
Reedy, G.T., D.G. Ettinger, J.F. Schneider, <strong>and</strong> S. Bourne, 1985. High-resolution gas chromatography/matrix<br />
isolation infrared spectrometry. Anal. Chem., 57: 1602–1609.<br />
Ristorcelli, D., F. Tomi, <strong>and</strong> J. Casanova, 1997. Enantiomeric differentiation <strong>of</strong> oxygenated monoterpenes by<br />
carbon-13 NMR in the presence <strong>of</strong> a chiral lanthanide shift reagent. J. Magnet. Resonance Anal.,<br />
1997: 40–46.<br />
Ross, M.S.F., 1976. Analysis <strong>of</strong> cinnamon oils by high-pressure liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr.,<br />
118: 273–275.<br />
Ruff, C., K. Hör, B. Weckerle, <strong>and</strong> P. Schreier, 2000. 2 H/ 1 H ratio analysis <strong>of</strong> flavor compounds by on-line gas<br />
chromatography pyrolysis isotope ratio mass spectrometry (HRGC-P-IRMS): Benzaldehyde. J. High<br />
Resolut. Chromatogr., 23: 357–359.<br />
Ruzicka, L. 1953. The isoprene rule <strong>and</strong> the biogenesis <strong>of</strong> terpenic compounds. Experientia, 9: 357–396.<br />
Sanagi, M.M., U.K. Ahmad, <strong>and</strong> R.M. Smith, 1993. Application <strong>of</strong> supercritical fluid extraction <strong>and</strong> chromatography<br />
to the analysis <strong>of</strong> turmeric. J. Chromatogr. Sci., 31: 20–25.<br />
Saritas, Y., 2000. Isolierung, Strukturaufklärung und stereochemische Untersuchungen von sesquiterpenoiden<br />
Inhaltsst<strong>of</strong>fen aus ätherischen Ölen von Bryophyta und höheren Pflanzen. PhD dissertation, University <strong>of</strong><br />
Hamburg.<br />
Schaefer, J., 1981. Comparison <strong>of</strong> adsorbents in head space sampling. In Flavour ¢81, P. Schreier (ed.),<br />
pp. 301–313. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter & Co.<br />
Scheffer, J.J.C., A. Koedam, <strong>and</strong> A. Baerheim Svendsen, 1976. Occurrence <strong>and</strong> prevention <strong>of</strong> isomerization <strong>of</strong><br />
some monoterpene hydrocarbons from essential oils during liquid–solid chromatography on silica gel.<br />
Chromatographia, 9: 425–432.<br />
Schneider, W., J.C. Frohne, <strong>and</strong> H. Bruderreck, 1982. Selektive gaschromatographische Messung sauerst<strong>of</strong>fhaltiger<br />
Verbindungen mittels Flammenionisationsdetektor. J. Chromatogr., 245: 71–83.<br />
Schreier, P., 1984. Chromatographic Studies <strong>of</strong> Biogenesis <strong>of</strong> Plant Volatiles. Heidelberg: Alfred Hüthig<br />
Verlag.<br />
Schultze, W., 1993. Moderne instrumentalanalytische Methoden zur Untersuchung komplexer Gemische. In<br />
Ätherische Öle—Anspruch und Wirklichkeit, R. Carle (ed.), pp. 135–184. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche<br />
Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.<br />
Schultze, W., G. Lange, <strong>and</strong> G. Heinrich, 1986. Analysis <strong>of</strong> dried plant material directly introduced into a mass<br />
spectrometer. (Part I <strong>of</strong> investigations on medicinal plants by mass spectrometry). In Progress in <strong>Essential</strong><br />
Oil Research, E.J. Brunke (ed.), pp. 577–596. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter & Co.<br />
Schultze, W., G. Lange, <strong>and</strong> G. Schmaus, 1992. Isobutane <strong>and</strong> Ammonia Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry<br />
<strong>of</strong> Sesquiterpene Hydrocarbons. Flavour Frag. J., 7: 55–64.<br />
Schurig, V., 1977. Enantiomerentrennung eines chiralen Olefins durch Komplexierungschromatographie an<br />
einem optisch aktiven Rhodium(1)-Komplex. Angew. Chem., 89: 113–114.<br />
Schurig, V. <strong>and</strong> H.P. Nowotny, 1988. Separation <strong>of</strong> enantiomers on diluted permethylated b-cyclodextrin by<br />
high resolution gas chromatography. J. Chromatogr., 441: 155–163.<br />
Schwanbeck, J., V. Koch, <strong>and</strong> K.H. Kubeczka, 1982. HPLC-separation <strong>of</strong> essential oils with chemically bonded<br />
stationary phases. In <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>—Analysis, Physiology, Composition, K.H. Kubeczka (ed.), pp. 70–81.<br />
Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag.<br />
Schwanbeck, J. <strong>and</strong> K.H. Kubeczka, 1979. Application <strong>of</strong> HPLC for separation <strong>of</strong> volatile terpene hydrocarbons.<br />
In Vorkommen und Analytik ätherischer Öle, K. H. Kubeczka (ed.), pp. 72–76. Stuttgart: Georg<br />
Thieme Verlag.<br />
Scott, R.P.W. <strong>and</strong> P. Kucera, 1979. Mode <strong>of</strong> operation <strong>and</strong> performance characteristics <strong>of</strong> microbore columns<br />
for use in liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr., 169: 51–72.<br />
Sewenig, S., D. Bullinger, U. Hener, <strong>and</strong> A. Mos<strong>and</strong>l, 2005. Comprehensive authentication <strong>of</strong> (E)-a(b)-ionone<br />
from raspberries, using constant flow MDGC-C/P-IRMS <strong>and</strong> enantio-MDGC-MS. J. Agric. Food Chem.,<br />
53: 838–844.<br />
Shema, J. <strong>and</strong> B., Fried (eds), 2003. <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> Thin-Layer Chromatography, 3rd ed. New York: Marcel<br />
Dekker.<br />
Snyder, J.K., K. Nakanishi, K. Hostettmann, <strong>and</strong> M. Hostettmann, 1984. Application <strong>of</strong> rotation locular countercurrent<br />
chromatography in natural products isolation. J. Liquid Chromatogr., 7: 243–256.<br />
Šorm, F., L. Dolejš, <strong>and</strong> J. Pliva, 1950. Collect. Czechoslov. Chem. Commun., 3: 187.<br />
Sprecher, E., 1963. Rücklaufapparatur zur erschöpfenden Wasserdampfdestillation ätherischen Öls aus voluminösem<br />
Destillationsgut. Dtsch. Apoth. Ztg., 103: 213–214.
38 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Stahl, E., 1953. Eine neue Apparatur zur gravimetrischen Erfassung kleinster Mengen ätherischer Öle.<br />
Microchim. Acta, 40: 367–372.<br />
Stahl, E. 1969a. A thermo micro procedure for rapid extraction <strong>and</strong> direct application in thin-layer chromatography.<br />
Analyst, 723–727.<br />
Stahl, E. (ed.), 1969b. Thin-Layer Chromatography. A Laboratory <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong>, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer.<br />
Stahl, E., 1976. Advances in the field <strong>of</strong> thermal procedures in direct combination with thin-layer chromatography.<br />
Accounts Chem. Resolut., 9: 75–80.<br />
Still, W.C., M. Kahn, <strong>and</strong> A. Mitra, 1978. Rapid chromatographic technique for preparative separations with<br />
moderate resolution. J. Org. Chem., 43: 2923–2925.<br />
Strack, D., P. Proksch, <strong>and</strong> P.G. Gülz, 1980. Reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oils. Z. Naturforsch., 35c: 675–681.<br />
Supelco, 2007. Solid Phase Microextraction CD, 6th ed., Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA.<br />
Takahisa, E. <strong>and</strong> K.H. Engel, 2005. 2,3-Di-O-methoxyethyl-6-O-tert-butyl-dimethylsilyl-b-cyclodextrin, a<br />
useful stationary phase for gas chromatographic separation <strong>of</strong> enantiomers. J. Chromatogr. A,<br />
1076: 148–154.<br />
Takahisa, E. <strong>and</strong> K.H. Engel, 2005a. 2,3-Di-O-methoxymethyl-6-O-tert-butyl-dimethylsilyl-g-cyclodextrin: A<br />
new class <strong>of</strong> cyclodextrin derivatives for gas chromatographic separation <strong>of</strong> enantiomers. J. Chromatogr.<br />
A, 1063: 181–192.<br />
Tanimura, T., J.J. Pisano, Y. Ito, <strong>and</strong> R.L. Bowman, 1970. Droplet countercurrent chromatography. <strong>Science</strong>,<br />
169: 54–56.<br />
ten Noever de Brauw, M.C., 1979. Combined gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: A powerful tool in<br />
analytical chemistry. J. Chromatogr., 165: 207–233.<br />
Teranishi, R., T.R. Mon, A.B. Robinson, P. Cary, <strong>and</strong> L. Pauling, 1972. Gas chromatography <strong>of</strong> volatiles from<br />
breath <strong>and</strong> urine. Anal. Chem., 44: 18–21.<br />
Tienpont, B., F. David, C. Bicchi, <strong>and</strong> P. S<strong>and</strong>ra, 2000. High capacity headspace sorptive extraction. J. Microcol.<br />
Sep., 12: 577–584.<br />
Tilden, W.A. 1875. On the action <strong>of</strong> nitrosyl chloride on organic bodies. Part II. On turpentine oil. J. Chem. Soc.<br />
[London], 28: 514–518.<br />
Tomi, F., P. Bradesi, A. Bighelli, <strong>and</strong> J. Casanova, 1995. Computer-aided identification <strong>of</strong> individual components<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils using carbon-13 NMR spectroscopy. J. Magnet. Resonance Anal., 1995: 25–34.<br />
Treibs, W. 1952. Über bi- und polycyclische Azulene. XIII. Das bicyclische Caryophyllen als Azulenbildner.<br />
Liebigs Ann. Chem., 576: 125–131.<br />
Tyihák, E., E. Mincsovics, <strong>and</strong> H. Kalász, 1979. New planar liquid chromatographic technique: Overpressured<br />
thin-layer chromatography. J. Chromatogr., 174: 75–81.<br />
van Beek, T.A. <strong>and</strong> D. Subrtova, 1995. Factors involved in the high pressure liquid chromatographic separation<br />
<strong>of</strong> alkenes by means <strong>of</strong> argentation chromatography on ion exchangers: Overview <strong>of</strong> theory <strong>and</strong> new<br />
practical developments. Phytochem. Anal., 6: 1–19.<br />
van Beek, T.A., N. van Dam, A. de Groot, T.A.M. Geelen, <strong>and</strong> L.H.W. van der Plas, 1994. Determination <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sesquiterpene dialdehyde polygodial by high_pressure liquid chromatography. Phytochem. Anal., 5: 19–23.<br />
von Baeyer, A. <strong>and</strong> O. Seuffert, 1901. Erschöpfende Bromierung des Menthons. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges., 34:<br />
40–53.<br />
Wagner, G. 1899. J. Russ. Phys. Chem. Soc., 31: 690, cited in H. Meerwein, 1914. Liebigs Ann. Chem., 405:<br />
129–175.<br />
Wallach, O. 1914. Terpene und Campher, 2nd ed., Leipzig: Veit & Co.<br />
Werkh<strong>of</strong>f, P., S. Brennecke, W. Bretschneider, M. Güntert, R. Hopp, <strong>and</strong> H. Surburg, 1993. Chirospecific analysis<br />
in essential oil, fragrance <strong>and</strong> flavor research. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch., 196: 307–328.<br />
WILEY Registry 2006. Wiley Registry <strong>of</strong> Mass Spectral Data, 8th ed. New York: Wiley.<br />
Woodward, R.B. 1941. Structure <strong>and</strong> the absorption spectra <strong>of</strong> a, b-unsaturated ketones. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 63:<br />
1123–1126.<br />
Wulf, L.W., C.W. Nagel, <strong>and</strong> A.L. Branen, 1978. High-pressure liquid chromatographic separation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
naturally occurring toxicants myristicin, related aromatic ethers <strong>and</strong> falcarinol. J. Chromatogr.,<br />
161: 271–278.<br />
Wylie, P.L. <strong>and</strong> B.D. Quimby, 1989. <strong>Applications</strong> <strong>of</strong> gas chromatography with atomic emission detector.<br />
J. High Resolut. Chromatogr., 12: 813–818.<br />
Yamauchi, Y. <strong>and</strong> M. Saito, 1990. Fractionation <strong>of</strong> lemon-peel oil by semi-preparative supercritical fluid<br />
chromatography. J. Chromatogr., 505: 237–246.<br />
Yarita, T., A. Nomura, <strong>and</strong> Y. Horimoto, 1994. Type analysis <strong>of</strong> citrus essential oils by multidimensional supercritical<br />
fluid chromatography/gas chromatography. Anal. Sci., 10: 25–29.
3<br />
Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Chlodwig Franz <strong>and</strong> Johannes Novak<br />
CONTENTS<br />
3.1 “<strong>Essential</strong> Oil-Bearing Plants”: Attempt <strong>of</strong> a Definition ..................................................... 39<br />
3.2 Phytochemical Variation ..................................................................................................... 41<br />
3.2.1 Chemotaxonomy ...................................................................................................... 41<br />
3.2.2 Inter- <strong>and</strong> Intraspecific Variation ............................................................................. 42<br />
3.2.2.1 Lamiaceae (Labiatae) <strong>and</strong> Verbenaceae .................................................... 42<br />
3.2.2.2 Asteraceae (Compositae) ............................................................................ 46<br />
3.3 Identification <strong>of</strong> Source Materials ....................................................................................... 52<br />
3.4 Genetic <strong>and</strong> Protein Engineering ........................................................................................ 53<br />
3.5 Resources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>: Wild Collection or Cultivation <strong>of</strong> Plants ............................... 54<br />
3.5.1 Wild Collection <strong>and</strong> Sustainability .......................................................................... 58<br />
3.5.2 Domestication <strong>and</strong> Systematic Cultivation .............................................................. 59<br />
3.5.3 Factors Influencing the Production <strong>and</strong> Quality <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Essential</strong> Oil-Bearing Plants .................................................................................... 60<br />
3.5.3.1 Genetic Variation <strong>and</strong> Plant Breeding ....................................................... 61<br />
3.5.3.2 Plant Breeding <strong>and</strong> Intellectual Property Rights ....................................... 63<br />
3.5.3.3 Intraindividual Variation between Plant Parts <strong>and</strong> Depending on the<br />
Developmental Stage (Morpho- <strong>and</strong> Ontogenetic Variation) .................... 65<br />
3.5.3.4 Environmental Influences .......................................................................... 69<br />
3.5.3.5 Cultivation Measures, Contaminations, <strong>and</strong> Harvesting ........................... 69<br />
3.6 International St<strong>and</strong>ards for Wild Collection <strong>and</strong> Cultivation ............................................. 72<br />
3.6.1 GA(C)P: Guidelines for Good Agricultural (<strong>and</strong> Collection) Practice <strong>of</strong><br />
Medicinal <strong>and</strong> Aromatic Plants ............................................................................... 72<br />
3.6.2 ISSC-MAP: The International St<strong>and</strong>ard on Sustainable Wild Collection<br />
<strong>of</strong> Medicinal <strong>and</strong> Aromatic Plants ........................................................................... 72<br />
3.6.3 FairWild ................................................................................................................... 73<br />
3.7 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 73<br />
References .................................................................................................................................... 73<br />
3.1 “ESSENTIAL OIL-BEARING PLANTS”: ATTEMPT OF A DEFINITION<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils are complex mixtures <strong>of</strong> volatile compounds produced by living organisms <strong>and</strong><br />
isolated by physical means only (pressing <strong>and</strong> distillation) from a whole plant or plant part <strong>of</strong> known<br />
taxonomic origin. The respective main compounds are mainly derived from three biosynthetic pathways<br />
only, the mevalonate pathway leading to sesquiterpenes, the methyl-erithrytol-pathway leading<br />
to mono- <strong>and</strong> diterpenes, <strong>and</strong> the shikimic acid pathway en route to phenylpropenes. Nevertheless,<br />
there are an almost uncountable number <strong>of</strong> single substances <strong>and</strong> a tremendous variation in the<br />
composition <strong>of</strong> essential oils. Many <strong>of</strong> these volatile substances have diverse ecological functions.<br />
They can act as internal messengers, as defensive substances against herbivores or as volatiles<br />
39
40 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
directing not only natural enemies to these herbivores but also attracting pollinating insects to their<br />
host (Harrewijn et al., 2001).<br />
All plants possess principally the ability to produce volatile compounds, quite <strong>of</strong>ten, however,<br />
only in traces. “<strong>Essential</strong> oil plants” in particular are those plant species delivering an essential<br />
oil <strong>of</strong> commercial interest. Two principal circumstances determine a plant to be used as an essential<br />
oil plant:<br />
a. A unique blend <strong>of</strong> volatiles like the flower scents in rose (Rosa spp.), jasmine (Jasminum<br />
sambac), or tuberose (Polyanthes tuberosa). Such flowers produce <strong>and</strong> immediately emit<br />
the volatiles by the epidermal layers <strong>of</strong> their petals (Bergougnoux et al., 2007). Therefore<br />
the yield is even in intensive smelling flowers very low, <strong>and</strong> besides distillation special<br />
techniques, as an example, enfleurage has to be applied to recover the volatile fragrance<br />
compounds.<br />
b. Secretion <strong>and</strong> accumulation <strong>of</strong> volatiles in specialized anatomical structures. This leads to<br />
higher concentrations <strong>of</strong> the essential oil in the plant. Such anatomical storage structures<br />
for essential oils can be secretory idioblasts (secretory cells), cavities/ducts, or gl<strong>and</strong>ular<br />
trichomes (Fahn, 1979, 1988; colorfully documented by Svoboda et al., 2000).<br />
Secretory idioblasts are individual cells producing an essential oil in large quantities <strong>and</strong> retaining<br />
the oil within the cell like the essential oil idioblasts in the roots <strong>of</strong> Vetiveria zizanioides which<br />
occurs within the cortical layer <strong>and</strong> close to the endodermis (Bertea <strong>and</strong> Camusso, 2002). Similar<br />
structures containing essential oils are also formed in many flowers, for example, Rosa sp., Viola<br />
sp., or Jasminum sp.<br />
Cavities or ducts consist <strong>of</strong> extracellular storage space that originate either from schizogeny<br />
(created by the dissolution <strong>of</strong> the middle lamella between the duct initials <strong>and</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> an intercellular<br />
space) or by lysogeny (programmed death <strong>and</strong> dissolution <strong>of</strong> cells). In both cases, the peripheral<br />
cells are becoming epithelial cells highly active in synthesis <strong>and</strong> secretion <strong>of</strong> their products into<br />
the extracellular cavities (Pickard, 2008). Schizogenic oil ducts are characteristic for the Apiaceae<br />
family, for example, Carum carvi, Foeniculum vulgare, or Cuminum cyminum, but also for<br />
Hypericaceae or Pinaceae. Lysogenic cavities are found in Rutaceae (Citrus sp., Ruta graveolens),<br />
Myrtaceae (e.g., Syzygium aromaticum), <strong>and</strong> others.<br />
Secreting trichomes (gl<strong>and</strong>ular trichomes) can be divided into two main categories: peltate <strong>and</strong><br />
capitate trichomes. Peltate gl<strong>and</strong>s consist <strong>of</strong> a basal epidermal cell, a neck-stalk cell <strong>and</strong> a secreting<br />
head <strong>of</strong> 4–16 cells with a large subcuticular space on the apex in which the secretion product is<br />
accumulated. The capitate trichomes possess only 1–4 secreting cells with only a small subcuticular<br />
space (Werker, 1993; Maleci Bini <strong>and</strong> Giuliani, 2006). Such structures are typical for Lamiaceae<br />
(the mint family), but also for Pelargonium sp.<br />
The monoterpene biosynthesis in different species <strong>of</strong> Lamiaceae, for example, sage (Salvia<br />
<strong>of</strong>fi cinalis) <strong>and</strong> peppermint (Mentha × piperita), is restricted to a brief period early in leaf development<br />
(Croteau et al., 1981; Gershenzon et al., 2000). The monoterpene biosynthesis in peppermint<br />
reaches a maximum in 15-day-old leaves, only very low rates were observed in leaves<br />
younger than 12 days or older than 20 days. The monoterpene content <strong>of</strong> the peppermint leaves<br />
increased rapidly up to day 21, then leveled <strong>of</strong>f, <strong>and</strong> kept stable for the remainder <strong>of</strong> the leaf life<br />
(Gershenzon et al., 2000).<br />
The composition <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong>ten changes between different plant parts. Phytochemical<br />
polymorphism is <strong>of</strong>ten the case between different plant organs. In Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum,<br />
a polymorphism within a plant could even be detected on a much lower level, namely between<br />
different oil gl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> a leaf (Johnson et al., 2004). This form <strong>of</strong> polymorphism seems to be not<br />
frequently occurring, differences in the composition between oil gl<strong>and</strong>s is more <strong>of</strong>ten related to the<br />
age <strong>of</strong> the oil gl<strong>and</strong>s (Grassi et al., 2004; Johnson et al., 2004; Novak et al., 2006a; Schmiderer<br />
et al., 2008).
Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 41<br />
Such polymorphisms can also be found quite frequently when comparing the essential oil composition<br />
<strong>of</strong> individual plants <strong>of</strong> a distinct species (intraspecific variation, “chemotypes”) <strong>and</strong> is<br />
based on the plants genetical background.<br />
The differences in the complex composition <strong>of</strong> two essential oils <strong>of</strong> one kind may sometimes be<br />
difficult to assign to specific chemotypes or to differences arising in the consequence <strong>of</strong> the reactions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the plants to specific environmental conditions, for example, to different growing locations.<br />
In general, the differences due to genetical differences are much bigger than by different environmental<br />
conditions. However, many intraspecific polymorphisms are probably not yet detected or<br />
have been described only recently even for widely used essential oil crops like sage (Novak et al.,<br />
2006b).<br />
3.2 PHYTOCHEMICAL VARIATION<br />
3.2.1 CHEMOTAXONOMY<br />
The ability to accumulate essential oils is not omnipresent in plants but scattered throughout the<br />
plant kingdom; in many cases, however, very frequent within—or a typical character <strong>of</strong>—certain<br />
plant families. From the taxonomical <strong>and</strong> systematic point <strong>of</strong> view, not the production <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oils is the distinctive feature since this is a quite heterogeneous group <strong>of</strong> substances, but either the<br />
type <strong>of</strong> secretory containers (trichomes, oil gl<strong>and</strong>s, lysogenic cavities, or schizogenic oil ducts) or<br />
the biosynthetically specific group <strong>of</strong> substances, for example, mono- or sesquiterpenes, phenylpropenes,<br />
<strong>and</strong> so on; the more a substance is deduced in the biosynthetic pathway the more specific it<br />
is for certain taxa: monoterpenes are typical for the genus Mentha, but menthol is characteristic for<br />
Mentha piperita <strong>and</strong> Mentha arvensis ssp. piperascens only; sesquiterpenes are common in the<br />
Achillea–millefolium complex, but only Achillea roseo-alba (2¥) <strong>and</strong> Achillea collina (4¥) are able<br />
to produce matricine as precursor <strong>of</strong> (the artifact) chamazulene (Vetter et al., 1997). On the other<br />
h<strong>and</strong>, the phenylpropenoid eugenol, typical for cloves (Syzygium aromaticum, Myrtaceae) can also<br />
be found in large amounts in that distant species, for example, cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum,<br />
Lauraceae) or basil (Ocimum basilicum, Lamiaceae); as sources for anethole are known aniseed<br />
(Pimpinella anisum) <strong>and</strong> fennel (F. vulgare) both Apiaceae, but also star anise (Illicium verum,<br />
Illiciaceae), Clausena anisata (Rutaceae), Croton zetneri (Euphorbiaceae), or Tagetes lucida<br />
(Asteraceae). Finally, eucalyptol (1,8-cineole)—named after its occurrence in Eucalyptus sp.<br />
(Myrtaceae)—may also be a main compound <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> galangal (Alpinia <strong>of</strong>fi cinarum,<br />
Zingiberaceae), bay laurel (Laurus nobilis, Lauraceae), Japan pepper (Zanthoxylum piperitum,<br />
Rutaceae), <strong>and</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> plants <strong>of</strong> the mint family, for example, sage (S. <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis, Salvia fruticosa,<br />
Salvia lav<strong>and</strong>ulifolia), rosemary (Rosmarinus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis), <strong>and</strong> mints (Mentha sp.). Taking the<br />
above facts into consideration, chemotaxonomically relevant are (therefore) common or distinct<br />
pathways, typical fingerprints, <strong>and</strong> either main compounds or very specific even minor or trace substances<br />
[e.g., d-3-carene to separate Citrus gr<strong>and</strong>is from other Citrus sp. (Gonzalez et al., 2002)].<br />
The plant families comprising species that yield a majority <strong>of</strong> the most economically important<br />
essential oils are not restricted to one specialized taxonomic group but are distributed among all<br />
plant classes: gymnosperms, for example, the families Cupressaceae (cedarwood, cedar leaf, juniper<br />
oil, etc.) <strong>and</strong> Pinaceae (pine <strong>and</strong> fir oils, etc.), as well as angiosperms, <strong>and</strong> among them within<br />
Magnoliopsida, Rosopsida, <strong>and</strong> Liliopsida. The most important families <strong>of</strong> dicots are Apiaceae<br />
(e.g., fennel, cori<strong>and</strong>er, <strong>and</strong> other aromatic seed/root oils), Asteraceae or Compositae (chamomile,<br />
wormwood, tarragon oil, etc.), Geraniaceae (geranium oil), Illiciaceae (star anise oil), Lamiaceae<br />
(mint, patchouli, lavender, oregano, <strong>and</strong> many other herb oils), Lauraceae (litsea, camphor, cinnamon,<br />
sassafras oil, etc.), Myristicaceae (nutmeg <strong>and</strong> mace), Myrtaceae (myrtle, cloves, <strong>and</strong> allspice),<br />
Oleaceae (jasmine oil), Rosaceae (rose oil), <strong>and</strong> Santalaceae (s<strong>and</strong>alwood oil). In monocots<br />
(Liliopsida), it is substantially restricted to Acoraceae (calamus), Poaceae (vetiver <strong>and</strong> aromatic<br />
grass oils), <strong>and</strong> Zingiberaceae (e.g., ginger <strong>and</strong> cardamom).
42 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Apart from the phytochemical group <strong>of</strong> substances typical for a taxon, the chemical outfit<br />
depends, furthermore, on the specific genotype, the stage <strong>of</strong> plant development—also influenced by<br />
environmental factors—<strong>and</strong> the plant part (see Section 3.2.1). Considering all these influences<br />
chemotaxonomic statements <strong>and</strong> conclusions have to be based on comparable material, grown <strong>and</strong><br />
harvested under comparable circumstances.<br />
3.2.2 INTER- AND INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION<br />
Knowledge on biochemical systematics <strong>and</strong> the inheritance <strong>of</strong> phytochemical characters depends on<br />
extensive investigations <strong>of</strong> taxa (particularly species) <strong>and</strong> populations on single-plant basis, respectively,<br />
<strong>and</strong> several examples <strong>of</strong> genera show that the taxa do indeed display different patterns.<br />
3.2.2.1 Lamiaceae (Labiatae) <strong>and</strong> Verbenaceae<br />
The presumably largest genus among the Lamiaceae is sage (Salvia L). consisting <strong>of</strong> about 900 species<br />
widely distributed in the temperate, subtropical, <strong>and</strong> tropical regions all over the world with<br />
major centers <strong>of</strong> diversity in the Mediterranean, in Central Asia, the Altiplano from Mexico throughout<br />
Central <strong>and</strong> South America, <strong>and</strong> in southern Africa. Almost 400 species are used in traditional<br />
<strong>and</strong> modern medicine, as aromatic herbs or ornamentals worldwide; among them are S. <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis,<br />
S. fruticosa, Salvia sclarea, Salvia divinorum, Salvia miltiorrhiza, <strong>and</strong> Salvia pomifera to name a<br />
few. Many applications are based on nonvolatile compounds, for example, diterpenes <strong>and</strong> polyphenolic<br />
acids. Regarding the essential oil, there are a vast number <strong>of</strong> mono- <strong>and</strong> sesquiterpenes found<br />
in sage but, in contrast to, for example, Ocimum sp. <strong>and</strong> Perilla sp. (also Lamiaceae), no phenylpropenes<br />
were detected.<br />
To underst<strong>and</strong> species-specific differences within this genus, the Mediterranean S. <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis<br />
complex (S. <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis, S. fruticosa, <strong>and</strong> S. lav<strong>and</strong>ulifolia) will be confronted with the Salvia stenophylla<br />
species complex (S. stenophylla, Salvia repens, <strong>and</strong> Salvia runcinata) indigenous to South<br />
Africa: In the S. <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis group usually a- <strong>and</strong> b-thujones, 1,8-cineole, camphor, <strong>and</strong> in some<br />
cases linalool, b-pinene, limonene, or cis-sabinyl acetate are the prevailing substances, whereas in<br />
the S. stenophylla complex quite <strong>of</strong>ten sesquiterpenes, for example, caryophyllene or a-bisabolol,<br />
are main compounds.<br />
Based on taxonomical studies <strong>of</strong> Salvia spp. (Hedge, 1992; Skoula et al., 2000; Reales et al.,<br />
2004) <strong>and</strong> a recent survey concerning the chemotaxonomy <strong>of</strong> S. stenophylla <strong>and</strong> its allies (Viljoen<br />
et al., 2006), Figure 3.1 shows the up-to-now-identified chemotypes within these taxa. Comparing<br />
the data <strong>of</strong> different publications the picture is, however, not as clear as demonstrated by six S. <strong>of</strong>fi -<br />
cinalis origins in Figure 3.2 (Chalchat et al., 1998; Asllani, 2000). This might be due to the prevailing<br />
chemotype in a population, the variation between single plants, the time <strong>of</strong> sample collection,<br />
<strong>and</strong> the sample size. This is exemplarily shown by one S. <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis population where the individuals<br />
varied in a-thujone, from 9% to 72%, b-thujone, from 2% to 24%; 1,8-cineole, from 4% to 18%;<br />
<strong>and</strong> camphor from 1% to 25%. The variation over three years <strong>and</strong> five harvests <strong>of</strong> one clone only<br />
ranged as follows: a-thujone 35–72%, b-thujone 1–7%, 1,8-cineole 8–15%, <strong>and</strong> camphor 1–18%<br />
(Bezzi, 1994; Bazina et al., 2002). But also all other (minor) compounds <strong>of</strong> the essential oil showed<br />
respective intraspecific variability (see, e.g., Giannouli <strong>and</strong> Kintzios, 2000).<br />
S. fruticosa was principally understood to contain 1,8-cineole as main compound but at best<br />
traces <strong>of</strong> thujones, as confirmed by Putievsky et al. (1986) <strong>and</strong> Kanias et al. (1998). In a comparative<br />
study <strong>of</strong> several origins, Máthé et al. (1996) identified, however, a population with atypically high<br />
b-thujone similar to S. <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis. Doubts on if this origin could be true S. fruticosa or a spontaneous<br />
hybrid <strong>of</strong> both species were resolved by extensive investigations on the phytochemical <strong>and</strong><br />
genetic diversity <strong>of</strong> S. fruticosa in Crete (Karousou et al., 1998; Skoula et al., 1999). There it was<br />
shown that all wild populations in western Crete consist <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole chemotypes only whereas in<br />
the eastern part <strong>of</strong> the isl<strong>and</strong> essential oils with up to 30% thujones, mainly b-thujone, could be<br />
observed. In Central Crete, finally, mixed populations were found. A cluster analysis based on
Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 43<br />
Chemotypes<br />
South African<br />
sage<br />
S. stenophylla S. repens S. runcinata<br />
α-bisabolol<br />
δ-3-carene<br />
limonene<br />
(E)-nerolidol<br />
γ-terpinene<br />
δ-3-carene<br />
ρ-cymene<br />
α-bisabolol<br />
(E)-nerolidol<br />
β-phell<strong>and</strong>rene<br />
β-caryophyllene<br />
ledol<br />
(E)-nerolidol<br />
α-bisabolol<br />
(E)-nerolidol<br />
β-caryophyllene<br />
α-pinene<br />
Chemotypes<br />
European sage<br />
S. <strong>of</strong>ficinalis S. lav<strong>and</strong>ulifolia S. fruticosa<br />
α-pinene<br />
camphor<br />
β-thujone<br />
α-thujone<br />
camphor<br />
1,8-cineole<br />
β-thujone<br />
camphor<br />
β-pinene<br />
1,8-cineole<br />
caryophyllene<br />
limonene<br />
1,8-cineole<br />
camphor<br />
β-thujone<br />
1,8-cineole<br />
FIGURE 3.1 Chemotypes <strong>of</strong> some South African <strong>and</strong> European Salvia species.<br />
r<strong>and</strong>om amplification <strong>of</strong> polymorphic DNA (RAPD) patterns confirmed the genetic differences<br />
between the West- <strong>and</strong> East-Crete populations <strong>of</strong> S. fruticosa (Skoula et al., 1999).<br />
A rather interesting example <strong>of</strong> diversity is oregano, which counts to the commercially most<br />
valued spices worldwide. More than 60 plant species are used under this common name showing<br />
similar flavor pr<strong>of</strong>iles characterized mainly by cymyl-compounds, for example, carvacrol <strong>and</strong> thymol.<br />
With few exemptions the majority <strong>of</strong> oregano species belong to the Lamiaceae <strong>and</strong> Verbenaceae<br />
families with the main genera Origanum <strong>and</strong> Lippia (Table 3.1). In 1989, almost all <strong>of</strong> the estimated<br />
15,000 ton/yr dried oregano originated from wild collection; today, some 7000 ha <strong>of</strong> Origanum<br />
onites are cultivated in Turkey alone (Baser, 2002), O. onites as well as other Origanum species are<br />
cultivated in Greece, Israel, Italy, Morocco, <strong>and</strong> other countries.<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
1,8-cineole<br />
α-thujone<br />
β-thujone<br />
10<br />
camphor<br />
5<br />
α-humulene<br />
0<br />
Albania<br />
Hungary<br />
Romania<br />
Czech<br />
Republic<br />
France<br />
Portugal<br />
FIGURE 3.2 Composition <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> six Salvia <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis origins.
44 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 3.1<br />
Species Used Commercially in the World as Oregano<br />
Family/Species<br />
Calamintha potosina Schaf.<br />
Coleus amboinicus Lour. (syn. C. aromaticus Benth)<br />
Labiatae<br />
Coleus aromaticus Benth.<br />
Hedeoma fl oribunda St<strong>and</strong>l.<br />
Hedeoma incona Torr.<br />
Hedeoma patens Jones<br />
Hyptis albida HBK.<br />
Hyptis americana (Aubl.) Urb. (H. gonocephala Gris.)<br />
Hyptis capitata Jacq.<br />
Hyptis pectinata Poit.<br />
Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit.<br />
Monarda austromontana Epling<br />
Ocimum basilicum L.<br />
Origanum compactum Benth. (syn. O. gl<strong>and</strong>ulosum Salzm, ex Benth.)<br />
Origanum dictamnus L. (Majorana dictamnus L.)<br />
Origanum elongatum (Bonent) Emberger et Maire<br />
Origanum fl oribundum Munby (O. cinereum Noe)<br />
Origanum grosii Pau et Font Quer ex letswaart<br />
Origanum majorana L.<br />
Origanum microphyllum (Benth) Vogel<br />
Origanum onites L. (syn. O. smyrneum L.)<br />
Origanum scabrum Boiss et Heldr. (syn. O. pulchrum Boiss et Heldr.)<br />
Origanum syriacum L. var. syriacum (syn. O. maru L.)<br />
Origanum vulgare L. subsp. gracile (Koch) letswaart (syn. O. gracile<br />
Koch, O. tyttanthum Gontscharov)<br />
Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum (Link) letswaart (syn. O. hirtum Link)<br />
Origanum vulgare ssp. virens (H<strong>of</strong>fmanns et Link) letswaart (syn. O.<br />
virens H<strong>of</strong>fmanns et Link)<br />
Origanum vulgare ssp. viride (Boiss.) Hayek (syn. O. viride) Halacsy<br />
(syn. O. heracleoticum L.)<br />
Origanum vulgare L. subsp. vulgare (syn. Thymus origanum (L.)<br />
Kuntze)<br />
Origanum vulgare L.<br />
Poliomintha longifl ora Gray<br />
Salvia sp.<br />
Satureja thymbra L.<br />
Thymus capitatus (L.) H<strong>of</strong>fmanns et Link (syn. Coridothymus<br />
capitatus (L.) Rchb.f.)<br />
Lantana citrosa (Small) Modenke<br />
Lantana gl<strong>and</strong>ulosissima Hayek<br />
Verbenaceae<br />
Lantana hirsuta Mart. et Gall.<br />
Lantana involucrata L.<br />
Lantana purpurea (Jacq.) Benth. & Hook. (syn. Lippia purpurea Jacq.)<br />
Lantana trifolia L.<br />
Commercial Name/s Found in Literature<br />
Oregano de la sierra, oregano, origanum<br />
Oregano, oregano brujo, oregano de Cartagena,<br />
oregano de Espana, oregano Frances<br />
Oregano de Espana, oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, oregano cimarron, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
*Turkish oregano, oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum, oregano verde<br />
*Greek oregano, oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, orenga, Oregano de Espana<br />
Oregano<br />
Oregano<br />
Oregano cabruno, oregano, Origanum<br />
*Spanish oregano, oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano xiu, oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano xiu, oregano silvestre, oregano,<br />
Origanum<br />
Oreganillo del monte, oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
continued
Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 45<br />
TABLE 3.1 (continued)<br />
Species Used Commercially in the World as Oregano<br />
Family/Species<br />
Lantana velutina Mart.&Gal.<br />
Lippia myriocephala Schlecht.&Cham.<br />
Lippia affi nis Schau.<br />
Lippia alba (Mill) N.E. Br. (syn. L. involucrata L.)<br />
Lippia berl<strong>and</strong>ieri Schau.<br />
Lippia cordiostegia Benth.<br />
Lippia formosa T.S.Br<strong>and</strong>eg.<br />
Lippia geisseana (R.A.Phil.) Soler.<br />
Lippia graveolens HBK<br />
Lippia helleri Britton<br />
Lippia micromera Schau.<br />
Lippia micromera var. helleri (Britton) Moldenke<br />
Lippia origanoides HBK<br />
Lippia palmeri var. spicata Rose<br />
Lippia palmeri Wats.<br />
Lippia umbellata Cav.<br />
Lippia velutina Mart. et Galeotti<br />
Borreria sp.<br />
Scrophulariaceae<br />
Limnophila stolonifera (Blanco) Merr.<br />
Eryngium foetidum L.<br />
Rubiaceae<br />
Apiaceae<br />
Commercial Name/s Found in Literature<br />
Oregano xiu, oregano, Origanum<br />
Oreganillo<br />
Oregano<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano<br />
Oreganillo, oregano montes, oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
*Mexican oregano, oregano cimarron, oregano<br />
Oregano del pais, oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano del pais, oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano<br />
Oregano, origano del pais<br />
Oregano<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oreganillo, oregano montes, oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oreganos, oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano, Origanum<br />
Oregano de Cartagena, oregano, Origanum<br />
Asteraceae<br />
Coleosanthus veronicaefolius HBK<br />
Oregano del cerro, oregano del monte, oregano<br />
del campo<br />
Eupatorium macrophyllum L. (syn. Hebeclinium macrophyllum DC.) Oregano, Origanum<br />
*Oregano species with economic importance according to Lawrence (1984).<br />
In comparison with sage, the genus Origanum is much smaller <strong>and</strong> consists <strong>of</strong> 43 species <strong>and</strong> 18<br />
hybrids according to the actual classification (Skoula <strong>and</strong> Harborne, 2002) with main distribution<br />
areas around the Mediterranean. Some subspecies <strong>of</strong> O. vulgare only are also found in the temperate<br />
<strong>and</strong> arid zones <strong>of</strong> Eurasia up to China. Nevertheless, the genus is characterized by a large morphological<br />
<strong>and</strong> phytochemical diversity (Kokkini, 1996; Baser, 2002; Skoula <strong>and</strong> Harborne, 2002).<br />
The occurrence <strong>of</strong> several chemotypes is reported, for example, for commercially used Origanum<br />
species, from Turkey (Baser, 2002). In O. onites, two chemotypes are described, a carvacrol type<br />
<strong>and</strong> a linalool type. Additionally, a “mixed type” with both basic types mixed may occur. In Turkey,<br />
two chemotypes <strong>of</strong> Origanum majorana are known, one contains cis-sabinene hydrate as chemotypical<br />
lead compound <strong>and</strong> is used as marjoram in cooking (“marjoramy”), while the other one<br />
contains carvacrol in high amounts <strong>and</strong> is used to distil “oregano oil” in a commercial scale.<br />
Variability <strong>of</strong> chemotypes continues also within the “marjoramy” O. majorana. Novak et al. (2002)<br />
detected in cultivated marjoram accessions additionally to cis-sabinene hydrate the occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />
polymorphism <strong>of</strong> cis-sabinene hydrate acetate. Since this chemotype did not influence the sensorial<br />
impression much, this chemotype was not eliminated in breeding, while an “<strong>of</strong>f-flavor” chemotype<br />
would have been certainly eliminated in its cultivation history. In natural populations <strong>of</strong> O. majorana<br />
from Cyprus besides the “classical” cis-sabinene hydrate type, a chemotype with a-terpineol as
46 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
main compound was also detected (Novak et al., 2008). The two extreme “<strong>of</strong>f-flavor” chemotypes<br />
in O. majorana, carvacrol-, <strong>and</strong> a-terpineol-chemotype are not to be found anywhere in cultivated<br />
marjoram, demonstrating one <strong>of</strong> the advantages <strong>of</strong> cultivation in delivering homogeneous qualities.<br />
The second “oregano” <strong>of</strong> commercial value—mainly used in the Americas—is “Mexican oregano”<br />
(Lippia graveolens HBK., Verbenaceae) endemic to California, Mexico, <strong>and</strong> throughout Central<br />
America (Fischer, 1998). Due to wild harvesting, only the few published data show essential oil contents<br />
largely ranging from 0.3% to 3.6%. The total number <strong>of</strong> up-to-now-identified essential oil compounds<br />
comprises almost 70 with the main constituents thymol (3.1–80.6%), carvacrol (0.5–71.2%),<br />
1,8-cineole (0.1–14%), <strong>and</strong> p-cymene (2.7–28.0%), followed by, for example, myrcene, g-terpinene, <strong>and</strong><br />
the sesquiterpene caryophyllene (Lawrence, 1984, Dominguez et al., 1989, Uribe-Hernández et al.,<br />
1992, Fischer et al., 1996; Vernin, 2001).<br />
In a comprehensive investigation <strong>of</strong> wild populations <strong>of</strong> L. graveolens collected from the hilly<br />
regions <strong>of</strong> Guatemala, three different essential oil chemotypes could be identified, a thymol, a carvacrol,<br />
<strong>and</strong> an absolutely irregular type (Fischer et al., 1996). Within the thymol type, contents <strong>of</strong> up<br />
to 85% thymol in the essential oil could be obtained <strong>and</strong> only traces <strong>of</strong> carvacrol. The irregular type<br />
has shown a very uncommon composition where no compound exceeds 10% <strong>of</strong> the oil, <strong>and</strong> also<br />
phenylpropenes, for example, eugenol <strong>and</strong> methyl eugenol, were present (Fischer et al., 1996; Fischer,<br />
1998). In Table 3.2, a comparison <strong>of</strong> recent data is given including Lippia alba commonly called<br />
“oregano” or “oregano del monte” although carvacrol <strong>and</strong> thymol are absent from the essential oil <strong>of</strong><br />
this species. In Guatemala, two different chemotypes were found within L. alba: a myrcenone <strong>and</strong> a<br />
citral type (Fischer et al., 2004). Besides it, a linalool, a carvone, a camphor—1,8-cineole, <strong>and</strong> a<br />
limonene–piperitone chemotype have been described (Dellacassa et al., 1990; Pino et al., 1997;<br />
Frighetto et al., 1998; Senatore <strong>and</strong> Rigano, 2001).<br />
Chemical diversity is <strong>of</strong> special interest if on genus or species level both terpenes as well as phenylpropenes<br />
can be found in the essential oil. Most Lamiaceae preferentially accumulate mono-<br />
(<strong>and</strong> sesqui-)terpenes in their volatile oils but some genera produce oils also rich in phenylpropenes,<br />
among these Ocimum sp. <strong>and</strong> Perilla sp.<br />
The genus Ocimum comprises over 60 species, <strong>of</strong> which Ocimum gratissimum <strong>and</strong> O. basilicum<br />
are <strong>of</strong> high economic value. Biogenetic studies on the inheritance <strong>of</strong> Ocimum oil constituents were<br />
reported by Khosla et al. (1989) <strong>and</strong> an O. gratissimum strain named “Clocimum” containing 65%<br />
<strong>of</strong> eugenol in its oil was described by Bradu et al. (1989). A number <strong>of</strong> different chemotypes <strong>of</strong> basil<br />
(O. basilicum) has been identified <strong>and</strong> classified (Vernin, 1984; Marotti et al., 1996) containing up<br />
to 80% linalool, up to 21.5% 1,8-cineole, 0.3–33.0% eugenol, <strong>and</strong> also the presumably toxic compounds<br />
methyl chavicol (estragole) <strong>and</strong> methyl eugenol in concentrations close to 50% (Elementi<br />
et al., 2006; Macchia et al., 2006).<br />
Perilla frutescens can be classified in several chemotypes as well according to the main monoterpene<br />
components perillaldehyde, elsholtziaketone, or perillaketones, <strong>and</strong> on the other side phenylpropanoid<br />
types containing myristicin, dillapiole, or elemicin (Koezuka et al., 1986). A<br />
comprehensive presentation on the chemotypes <strong>and</strong> the inheritance <strong>of</strong> the mentioned compounds<br />
was given by this author in Hay <strong>and</strong> Waterman (1993). In the referred last two examples not only the<br />
sensorial but also the toxicological properties <strong>of</strong> the essential oil compounds are decisive for the<br />
(further) commercial use <strong>of</strong> the respective species’ biodiversity.<br />
Although the Labiatae family plays an outst<strong>and</strong>ing role as regards the chemical polymorphism<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils, also in other essential oil containing plant families <strong>and</strong> genera a comparable phytochemical<br />
diversity can be observed.<br />
3.2.2.2 Asteraceae (Compositae)<br />
Only a limited number <strong>of</strong> genera <strong>of</strong> the Asteraceae are known as essential oil plants, among<br />
them Tagetes, Achillea, <strong>and</strong> Matricaria. The genus Tagetes comprises actually 55 species, all <strong>of</strong><br />
them endemic to the American continents with the center <strong>of</strong> biodiversity between 30° northern<br />
<strong>and</strong> 30° southern latitude. One <strong>of</strong> the species largely used by the indigenous population is
Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 47<br />
TABLE 3.2<br />
Main <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Compounds <strong>of</strong> Lippia graveolens <strong>and</strong> L. alba According to Recent Data<br />
L. graveolens L. alba<br />
Fischer et al.<br />
(1996)<br />
Guatemala<br />
Senatore et al.<br />
(2001)<br />
Vernin et al.<br />
(2001)<br />
Fischer<br />
(1998)<br />
Guatemala<br />
Senatore<br />
et al. (2001)<br />
Lorenzo<br />
(2001)<br />
Compound Thymol-Type<br />
Carvacrol-<br />
Type<br />
Irregular<br />
Type Guatemala El-Salvador<br />
Myrcenone-<br />
Type<br />
Cineole-<br />
Type Guatemala Uruguay<br />
Myrcene 1.3 1.9 2.7 1.1 t 6.5 1.7 0.2 0.8<br />
p-Cymene 2.7 6.9 2.8 5.5 2.1 t t 0.7 n.d.<br />
1.8-Cineole 0.1 0.6 5.0 2.1 t t 22.8 14.2 1.3<br />
Limonene 0.2 0.3 1.5 0.8 t 1.0 3.2 43.6 2.9<br />
Linalool 0.7 1.4 3.8 0.3 t 4.0 2.4 1.2 55.3<br />
Myrcenon n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. 54.6 3.2 n.d. n.d.<br />
Piperitone n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. t t 30.6 n.d.<br />
Thymol 80.6 19.9 6.8 31.6 7.3 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.<br />
Carvacrol 1.3 45.2 1.1 0.8 71.2 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.<br />
b-Caryophyllene 2.8 3.5 8.7 4.6 9.2 2.6 1.2 1.0 9.0<br />
a-Humulene 1.9 2.3 5.7 3.0 5.0 0.7 t 0.6 0.9<br />
Caryophyll.-ox. 0.3 0.8 3.3 4.8 t 1.8 3.0 1.1 0.6<br />
Z-Dihydrocarvon/<br />
n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. 13.1 0.6 0.1 0.8<br />
Z-Ocimenone<br />
E-Dihydrocarvon n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. 4.9 n.d. t 1.2<br />
n.d. = Not detectable; t = traces; main compounds in bold.
48 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 3.3<br />
Main Compounds <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Essential</strong> Oil <strong>of</strong> Selected Tagetes lucida Types (in % <strong>of</strong> dm)<br />
Substance<br />
Anethole<br />
Type (2)<br />
Estragole<br />
Type (8)<br />
Methyleugenol<br />
Type (7)<br />
Nerolidol<br />
Type (5)<br />
Mixed<br />
Type<br />
Linalool 0.26 0.69 1.01 Tr. 3.68<br />
Estragole 11.57 78.02 8.68 3.23 24.28<br />
Anethole 73.56 0.75 0.52 Tr. 30.17<br />
Methyleugenol 1.75 5.50 79.80 17.76 17.09<br />
b-Caryophyllene 0.45 1.66 0.45 2.39 0.88<br />
Germacrene D 2.43 2.89 1.90 Tr. 5.41<br />
Methylisoeugenol 1.42 2.78 2.00 Tr. 3.88<br />
Nerolidol 0.35 0.32 0.31 40.52 1.24<br />
Spathulenol 0.10 0.16 0.12 Tr. 0.23<br />
Carophyllene oxide 0.05 0.27 0.45 10.34 0.53<br />
Location <strong>of</strong> origin in Guatemala: (2) Cabrican/Quetzaltenango, (5) La Fuente/Jalapa, (7) Joyabaj/El Quiche, (8) Sipacapa/<br />
S.Marcos, Mixed Type: Taltimiche/San Marcos.<br />
Main compounds in bold.<br />
“pericon” (T. lucida Cav.), widely distributed over the highl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Mexico <strong>and</strong> Central America<br />
(Stanley <strong>and</strong> Steyermark, 1976). In contrast to almost all other Tagetes species characterized by the<br />
content <strong>of</strong> tagetones, this species contains phenylpropenes <strong>and</strong> terpenes. A detailed study on its<br />
diversity in Guatemala resulted in the identification <strong>of</strong> several eco- <strong>and</strong> chemotypes (Table 3.3):<br />
anethol, methyl chavicol (estragol), methyl eugenol, <strong>and</strong> one sesquiterpene type producing higher<br />
amounts <strong>of</strong> nerolidol (Bicchi et al., 1997; Goehler, 2006). The distribution <strong>of</strong> the three main phenylpropenes<br />
in six populations is illustrated in Figure 3.3. In comparison with the plant materials<br />
investigated by Ciccio (2004) <strong>and</strong> Marotti et al. (2004) containing oils with 90–95% estragol, only<br />
the germplasm collection <strong>of</strong> Guatemaltekan provenances (Goehler, 2006) allows to select individuals<br />
with high anethol but low to very low estragol or methyleugenol content—or with interestingly<br />
high nerolidol content, as mentioned above.<br />
The genus Achillea is widely distributed over the northern hemisphere <strong>and</strong> consists <strong>of</strong> approximately<br />
120 species, <strong>of</strong> which the Achillea millefolium aggregate (yarrow) represents a polyploid<br />
complex <strong>of</strong> allogamous perennials (Saukel <strong>and</strong> Länger, 1992; Vetter <strong>and</strong> Franz, 1996). The different<br />
taxa <strong>of</strong> the recent classification (minor species <strong>and</strong> subspecies) are morphologically <strong>and</strong> chemically<br />
to a certain extent distinct <strong>and</strong> only the diploid taxa Achillea asplenifolia <strong>and</strong> A. roseo-alba as well<br />
60<br />
80<br />
70<br />
Anethole (%)<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
Estragole (%)<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
Methyleugenol (%)<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
7<br />
8<br />
0<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
7<br />
8<br />
0<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
7<br />
8<br />
Population<br />
Population<br />
Population<br />
FIGURE 3.3 Variability <strong>of</strong> anethole, methyl eugenol, <strong>and</strong> methyl chavicol (estragole) in the essential oil <strong>of</strong><br />
six Tagetes lucida—populations from Guatemala.
Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 49<br />
TABLE 3.4<br />
Taxa within the Achillea-Millefolium-Group (Yarrow)<br />
Taxon<br />
Ploidy<br />
Level Main Compounds<br />
A. setacea W. et K. 2¥ Rupicoline<br />
A. aspleniifolia Vent. 2¥ (4¥) 7,8-Guajanolide<br />
Artabsin-derivatives<br />
3-Oxa-Guajanolide<br />
A. roseo-alba Ehrend. 2¥ Artabsin-derivatives<br />
3-Oxaguajanolide<br />
Matricinderivatives<br />
A. collina Becker 4¥ Artabsin-derivatives<br />
3-Oxaguajanolide<br />
Matricinderivatives<br />
Matricarinderivatives<br />
A. pratensis Saukel u. Länger 4¥ Eudesmanolides<br />
A. distans ssp. Distans W. et K. 6¥ Longipinenones<br />
A. distans ssp. Styriaca 4¥<br />
A. tanacetifolia (stricta) W. et K. 6¥<br />
A mill. ssp. sudetica 6¥ Guajanolidperoxide<br />
A. mill. ssp. Mill. L. 6¥<br />
A. pannonica Scheele 8¥ (6¥) Germacrene<br />
Guajanolidperoxide<br />
Source:<br />
Franz et al., Unpublished.<br />
as the tetraploid A. collina <strong>and</strong> Achillea ceretanica are characterized by proazulens, for example,<br />
achillicin, whereas the other taxa, especially 6¥ <strong>and</strong> 8¥ contain eudesmanolides, longipinenes, germacranolides,<br />
<strong>and</strong>/or guajanolid peroxides, (Table 3.4). The intraspecific variation in the proazulene<br />
content ranged from traces up to 80%, other essential oil components <strong>of</strong> the azulenogenic<br />
species are, for example, a- <strong>and</strong> b-pinene, borneol, camphor, sabinene, or caryophyllene (Kastner<br />
et al., 1992). The frequency distribution <strong>of</strong> proazulene individuals among two populations is shown<br />
in Figure 3.4.<br />
Crossing experiments resulted in proazulene being a recessive character <strong>of</strong> di- <strong>and</strong> tetraploid<br />
Achillea sp. (Vetter et al., 1997) similar to chamomile (Franz, 1993a,b). Finally, according to<br />
3%<br />
1%<br />
1%<br />
Pro A<br />
12%<br />
Budakalaszi 210<br />
5%<br />
Pro-chamazulene<br />
1,8-cineole<br />
Linalool<br />
β-caryophyllene<br />
11%<br />
7%<br />
65%<br />
Pro-chamazulene<br />
1,8-cineole<br />
Linalool<br />
Borneol<br />
β-caryophyllene<br />
95%<br />
FIGURE 3.4 Frequency distribution <strong>of</strong> proazulene individuals among two Achillea sp. populations.
50 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Steinlesberger et al. (2002) also a plant-to-plant variation in the enantiomers <strong>of</strong>, for example, a- <strong>and</strong><br />
b-pinene as well as sabinene exists in yarrow oils, which makes it even more complicated to use<br />
phytochemical characters for taxonomical purposes.<br />
Differences in the essential oil content <strong>and</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> chamomile flowers (Matricaria<br />
recutita) have long been recognized due to the fact that the distilled oil is either dark blue, green, or<br />
yellow, depending on the prochamazulene content (matricin as prochamazulene in chamomile is<br />
transformed to the blue-colored artifact chamazulene during the distillation process). Recognizing<br />
also the great pharmacological potential <strong>of</strong> the bisabolols, a classification into the chemotypes<br />
(-)-a-bisabolol, (-)-a-bisabololoxide A, (-)-a-bisabololoxide B, (-)-a-bisabolonoxide (A), <strong>and</strong><br />
(pro)chamazulene was made by Franz (1982, 1989a). Examining the geographical distribution<br />
revealed a regional differentiation, where an a-bisabolol—(pro) chamazulene population was identified<br />
on the Iberian peninsula, mixed populations containing chamazulene, bisabolol, <strong>and</strong> bisabololoxides<br />
A/B are most frequent in Central Europe, <strong>and</strong> prochamazulene—free bisabolonoxide<br />
populations are indigenous to southeast Europe <strong>and</strong> minor Asia. In the meantime, Wogiatzi et al.<br />
(1999) have shown for Greece <strong>and</strong> Taviani et al. (2002) for Italy a higher diversity <strong>of</strong> chamomile<br />
including a-bisabolol types. This classification <strong>of</strong> populations <strong>and</strong> chemotypes was extended by<br />
analyzing populations at the level <strong>of</strong> individual plants (Schröder, 1990) resulting in the respective<br />
frequency distributions (Figure 3.5).<br />
In addition, the range <strong>of</strong> essential oil components in the chemotypes <strong>of</strong> one Central European<br />
population is shown in Table 3.5 (Franz, 2000).<br />
Data on inter- <strong>and</strong> intraspecific variation <strong>of</strong> essential oils are countless <strong>and</strong> recent reviews are<br />
known for a number <strong>of</strong> genera published, for example, in the series “Medicinal <strong>and</strong> Aromatic Plants—<br />
Industrial Pr<strong>of</strong>iles” (Harwood publications, Taylor & Francis <strong>and</strong> CRC, Press, respectively).<br />
The generally observed quantitative <strong>and</strong> qualitative variation in essential oils draws the attention<br />
i.a. to appropriate r<strong>and</strong>om sampling for getting valid information on the chemical pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> a species<br />
or population. As concerns quantitative variations <strong>of</strong> a certain pattern or substance, Figure 3.6 shows<br />
2%<br />
2%<br />
H 29<br />
CH 29<br />
4%<br />
Menemen<br />
12%<br />
29%<br />
30%<br />
96%<br />
37%<br />
88%<br />
Bisabolol type<br />
Bisabolol oxide A type<br />
Bisabolol oxide B type<br />
Bisabolon oxide type<br />
Azulene type<br />
FIGURE 3.5 Frequency distribution <strong>of</strong> chemotypes in three varieties/populatios <strong>of</strong> chamomile [Matricaria<br />
recutita (L.) Rauschert].
Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 51<br />
TABLE 3.5<br />
Grouping within a European Spontaneous Chamomile, Figures in<br />
% <strong>of</strong> Terpenoids in the <strong>Essential</strong> Oil <strong>of</strong> the Flower Heads<br />
Chamazulen α-Bisabolol α-B.-Oxide A α-B.-Oxide B<br />
α-Bisabolol-Type<br />
Range 2.5–35.2 58.8–92.1 n.d.–1.0 n.d.–3.2<br />
Mean 23.2 68.8 n.d. n.d.<br />
α-Bisabololoxide A-Type<br />
Range 6.6–31.2 0.5–12.3 31.7–66.7 1.9–22.4<br />
Mean 21.3 2.1 53.9 11.8<br />
α-Bisabololoxide B-Type<br />
Range 7.6–24.2 0.8–6.5 1.6–4.8 61.6–80.5<br />
Mean 16.8 2.0 2.6 72.2<br />
Chamazulene-Type<br />
Range 76.3–79.2 5.8–8.3 n.d.–0.8 n.d.–2.6<br />
Mean 77.8 7.1 n.d. n.d.<br />
Source: Franz, Ch., 2000. Biodiversity <strong>and</strong> r<strong>and</strong>om sampling in essential oil plants. Lecture<br />
31st ISEO, Hamburg.<br />
Main compounds in bold.<br />
mg<br />
360<br />
Bisabolol<br />
340<br />
320<br />
300<br />
H 29<br />
280<br />
180<br />
160<br />
140<br />
120<br />
100<br />
CH 29<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
n plants (individuals)<br />
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50<br />
FIGURE 3.6 (−)-a-Bisabolol-content (mg/100 g crude drug) in two chamomile (Matricaria recutita) populations:<br />
mean value in dependence <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> individuals used for sampling.
52 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
80%<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
1,8-cineole<br />
linalool<br />
trans-sabinene hydrate<br />
cis-sabinene hydrate<br />
α-terpineol<br />
α-terpinyl acetate<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
All plants<br />
Linaloolchemotype<br />
1,8-Cineolechemotype<br />
Sabinene<br />
hydratechemotype<br />
α-Terpineolchemotype<br />
FIGURE 3.7 Mean values <strong>of</strong> the principal essential compounds <strong>of</strong> a Thymus vulgaris population (left) in<br />
comparison to the mean values <strong>of</strong> the chemotypes within the same population.<br />
exemplarily the bisabolol content <strong>of</strong> two chamomile populations depending on the number <strong>of</strong> individual<br />
plants used for sampling. At small numbers, the mean value oscillates strongly <strong>and</strong> only after<br />
at least 15–20 individuals the range <strong>of</strong> variation becomes acceptable. Quite different appears the situation<br />
at qualitative differences, that is, “either-or-variations” within populations or taxa, for example,<br />
carvacrol/thymol, a-/b-thujone/1,8-cineole/camphor, or monoterpenes/phenylpropenes. Any r<strong>and</strong>om<br />
sample may give nonspecific information only on the principal chemical pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the respective<br />
population provided that the sample is representative. This depends on the number <strong>of</strong> chemotypes,<br />
their inheritance, <strong>and</strong> frequency distribution within the population, <strong>and</strong> generally speaking no less<br />
than 50 individuals are needed for that purpose, as it can be derived from the comparison <strong>of</strong> chemotypes<br />
in a Thymus vulgaris population (Figure 3.7).<br />
The overall high variation in essential oil compositions can be explained by the fact that quite<br />
different products might be generated by small changes in the synthase sequences only. On the other<br />
h<strong>and</strong>, different synthases may be able to produce the same substance in systematically distant taxa.<br />
The different origin <strong>of</strong> such substances can be identified by, for example, the 12 C: 13 C ratio (Mos<strong>and</strong>l,<br />
1993). “Hence, a simple quantitative analysis <strong>of</strong> the essential oil composition is not necessarily<br />
appropriate for estimating genetic proximity even in closely related taxa” (Bazina et al., 2002).<br />
3.3 IDENTIFICATION OF SOURCE MATERIALS<br />
As illustrated by the previous paragraph, one <strong>of</strong> the crucial points <strong>of</strong> using plants as sources for<br />
essential oils is their heterogeneity. A first prerequisite for reproducible compositions is therefore an<br />
unambiguous botanical identification <strong>and</strong> characterization <strong>of</strong> the starting material. The first approach<br />
is the classical taxonomical identification <strong>of</strong> plant materials based on macro- <strong>and</strong> micromorphological<br />
features <strong>of</strong> the plant. The identification is followed by phytochemical analysis that may contribute<br />
to species identification as well as to the determination <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> the essential oil. This<br />
approach is now complemented by DNA-based identification.<br />
DNA is a long polymer <strong>of</strong> nucleotides, the building units. One <strong>of</strong> four possible nitrogenous bases<br />
is part <strong>of</strong> each nucleotide <strong>and</strong> the sequence <strong>of</strong> the bases on the polymer str<strong>and</strong> is characteristic for
Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 53<br />
each living individual. Some regions <strong>of</strong> the DNA, however, are conserved on the species or family<br />
level <strong>and</strong> can be used to study the relationship <strong>of</strong> taxa (Taberlet et al., 1991; Wolfe <strong>and</strong> Liston, 1998).<br />
DNA sequences conserved within a taxon but different between taxa can therefore be used to identify<br />
a taxon (“DNA-barcoding”) (Hebert et al., 2003a; Kress et al., 2005). A DNA-barcoding consortium<br />
was founded in 2004 with the ambitious goal to build a barcode library for all eukaryotic<br />
life in the next 20 years (Ratnasingham <strong>and</strong> Hebert, 2007). New sequencing technologies (454,<br />
Solexa, SOLiD) enable a fast <strong>and</strong> representative analysis, but will be applied due to their high costs<br />
in the moment only in the next phase <strong>of</strong> DNA-barcoding (Frezal <strong>and</strong> Leblois, 2008). DNA-barcoding<br />
<strong>of</strong> animals has already become a routine task. DNA-barcoding <strong>of</strong> plants, however, are still not<br />
trivial <strong>and</strong> a scientific challenge (Pennisi, 2007).<br />
Besides sequence information-based approaches, multilocus DNA methods [RAPD, amplified<br />
fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), etc.] are complementing in resolving complicated taxa <strong>and</strong><br />
can become a barcode for the identification <strong>of</strong> populations <strong>and</strong> cultivars (Weising et al., 2005). With<br />
multilocus DNA methods, it is furthermore possible to tag a specific feature <strong>of</strong> a plant <strong>of</strong> which the<br />
genetic basis is still unknown. This approach is called molecular markers (in sensu strictu) because<br />
they mark the occurrence <strong>of</strong> a specific trait like a chemotype or flower color. The gene regions visualized,<br />
for example, on an agarose gel is not the specific gene responsible for a trait but is located on the<br />
genome in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> this gene <strong>and</strong> therefore co-occurs with the trait <strong>and</strong> is absent when the trait<br />
is absent. An example for such an inexpensive <strong>and</strong> fast polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-system was<br />
developed by Bradbury et al. (2005) to distinguish fragrant from nonfragrant rice cultivars. If markers<br />
would be developed for chemotypes in essential oil plants, species identification by DNA <strong>and</strong> the<br />
determination <strong>of</strong> a chemotype could be performed in one step.<br />
Molecular biological methods to identify species are nowadays routinely used in feed- <strong>and</strong> foodstuffs<br />
to identify microbes, animals, <strong>and</strong> plants. Especially the discussion about traceability <strong>of</strong> genetically<br />
modified organisms (GMO’s) throughout the complete chain (“from the living organism to the<br />
super-market”) has sped up research in this area (Auer, 2003; Miraglia et al., 2004). One advantage<br />
<strong>of</strong> molecular biological methods is the possibility to be used in a number <strong>of</strong> processed materials like<br />
fatty oil (Pafundo et al., 2005) or even solvent extracts (Novak et al., 2007). The presence <strong>of</strong> minor<br />
amounts <strong>of</strong> DNA in an essential oil cannot be excluded a priori although distillation as separation<br />
technique would suggest the absence <strong>of</strong> DNA. However, small plant or DNA fragments could distill<br />
over or the essential oil could come in contact with plant material after distillation.<br />
3.4 GENETIC AND PROTEIN ENGINEERING<br />
Genetic engineering is defined as the direct manipulation <strong>of</strong> the genes <strong>of</strong> organisms by laboratory<br />
techniques, not to be confused with the indirect manipulation <strong>of</strong> genes in traditional (plant) breeding.<br />
Transgenic or genetically modifi ed organisms (GMOs) are organisms (bacteria, plants, etc.)<br />
that have been engineered with single or multiple genes (either from the same species or from a<br />
different species), using contemporary molecular biology techniques. These are organisms with<br />
improved characteristics, in plants, for example, with resistance or tolerance to biotic or abiotic<br />
stresses such as insects, disease, drought, salinity, <strong>and</strong> temperature. Another important goal in<br />
improving agricultural production conditions is to facilitate weed control by transformed plants<br />
resistant to broadb<strong>and</strong> herbicides like glufosinate. Peppermint has been successfully transformed<br />
with the introduction <strong>of</strong> the bar gene, which encodes phosphinothricin acetyltransferase, an enzyme<br />
inactivating glufosinate-ammonium or the ammonium salt <strong>of</strong> glufosinate, phosphinothricin making<br />
the plant insensitive to the systemic, broad- spectrum herbicide Roundup (“Roundup Ready mint”)<br />
(Li et al., 2001).<br />
A first step in genetic engineering is the development <strong>and</strong> optimization <strong>of</strong> transformation (gene<br />
transfer) protocols for the target species. Such optimized protocols exist for essential oil plants such<br />
as lav<strong>and</strong>in (Lav<strong>and</strong>ula × intermedia; Dronne et al., 1999), spike lavender (Lav<strong>and</strong>ula latifolia;<br />
Nebauer et al., 2000), <strong>and</strong> peppermint (Mentha × piperita; Diemer et al., 1998; Niu et al., 2000).
54 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 3.6<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> Oil Composition <strong>and</strong> Yield <strong>of</strong> Transgenic Peppermint Transformed with Genes<br />
Involved in Monoterpene Biosynthesis<br />
Gene Method Limonene Mentho-Furan Pulegone Menthone Menthol<br />
Oil Yield<br />
[lb/acre]<br />
WT — 1.7 4.3 2.1 20.5 44.5 97.8<br />
dxr overexpress 1.6 3.6 1.8 19.6 45.6 137.9<br />
Mfs antisense 1.7 1.2 0.4 22.7 45.2 109.7<br />
l-3-h cosuppress 74.7 0.4 0.1 4.1 3.0 99.6<br />
Source: Wildung, M.R. <strong>and</strong> R.B. Croteau, 2005. Transgenic Res., 14: 365–372.<br />
dxr = Deoxyxylulose phosphate reductoisomerase; l-3-h = limonene-3-hydroxylase; mfs = menth<strong>of</strong>uran synthase; WT =<br />
wild type.<br />
In spike lavender, an additional copy <strong>of</strong> the 1-deoxy-d-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase gene<br />
(DXS), the first enzymatic step in the methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway leading to the<br />
precursors <strong>of</strong> monoterpenes, from Arabidopsis thaliana was introduced <strong>and</strong> led to an increase <strong>of</strong><br />
the essential oil <strong>of</strong> the leaves <strong>of</strong> up to 360% <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> flowers <strong>of</strong> up to 74% (Munoz-<br />
Bertomeu et al., 2006).<br />
In peppermint, many different steps to alter essential oil yield <strong>and</strong> composition were already<br />
targeted (reviewed by Wildung <strong>and</strong> Croteau 2005; Table 3.6). The overexpression <strong>of</strong> deoxyxylulose<br />
phosphate reductoisomerase (DXR), the second step in the MEP-pathway, increased the essential oil<br />
yield by approximately 40% tested under field conditions (Mahmoud <strong>and</strong> Croteau, 2001). The overexpression<br />
<strong>of</strong> geranyl diphosphate synthase (GPPS) leads to a similar increase <strong>of</strong> the essential oil.<br />
Menth<strong>of</strong>uran, an undesired compound, was downregulated by an antisense method (a method to<br />
influence or block the activity <strong>of</strong> a specific gene). Overexpression <strong>of</strong> the menth<strong>of</strong>uran antisense<br />
RNA was responsible for an improved oil quality by reducing both menth<strong>of</strong>uran <strong>and</strong> pulegone in<br />
one transformation step (Mahmoud <strong>and</strong> Croteau, 2003). The ability to produce a peppermint oil<br />
with a new composition was demonstrated by Mahmoud et al. (2004) by upregulating limonene by<br />
cosuppression <strong>of</strong> limonene-3-hydroxylase, the enzyme responsible for the transformation <strong>of</strong><br />
(-)-limonene to (-)-trans-isopiperitenol en route to menthol.<br />
Protein engineering is the application <strong>of</strong> scientific methods (mathematical <strong>and</strong> laboratory methods)<br />
to develop useful or valuable proteins. There are two general strategies for protein engineering,<br />
r<strong>and</strong>om mutagenesis, <strong>and</strong> rational design. In rational design, detailed knowledge <strong>of</strong> the<br />
structure <strong>and</strong> function <strong>of</strong> the protein is necessary to make desired changes by site-directed mutagenesis,<br />
a technique already well developed. An impressive example <strong>of</strong> the rational design <strong>of</strong><br />
monoterpene synthases was given by Kampranis et al. (2007) who converted a 1,8-cineole synthase<br />
from S. fruticosa into a synthase producing sabinene, the precursor <strong>of</strong> a- <strong>and</strong> b-thujone with<br />
a minimum number <strong>of</strong> substitutions. They went also a step further <strong>and</strong> converted this mono terpene<br />
synthase into a sesquiterpene synthase by substituting a single amino acid that enlarged the cavity<br />
<strong>of</strong> the active site enough to accommodate the larger precursor <strong>of</strong> the sesquiterpenes, farnesyl<br />
pyrophosphate (FPP).<br />
3.5 RESOURCES OF ESSENTIAL OILS: WILD COLLECTION<br />
OR CULTIVATION OF PLANTS<br />
The raw materials for producing essential oil are resourced either from collecting them in nature<br />
(“wild collection”) or from cultivating the plants (Table 3.7).
Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 55<br />
TABLE 3.7<br />
Important <strong>Essential</strong> Oil-Bearing Plants—Common <strong>and</strong> Botanical Names Incl. Family,<br />
Plant Parts Used, Raw Material Origin, <strong>and</strong> Trade Quantities <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Essential</strong> Oil<br />
Trade Name Species Plant Family<br />
Used Plant<br />
Part(s)<br />
Wild Collection/<br />
Cultivation<br />
Trade<br />
Quantities a<br />
Ambrette seed Hibiscus abelmoschus L. Malvaceae Seed Cult LQ<br />
Amyris Amyris balsamifera L. Rutaceae Wood Wild LQ<br />
Angelica root Angelica archangelica L. Apiaceae Root Cult LQ<br />
Anise seed Pimpinella anisum L. Apiaceae Fruit Cult LQ<br />
Armoise Artemisia herba-alba Asso Asteraceae Herb Cult/wild LQ<br />
Asafoetida Ferula assa-foetida L. Apiaceae Resin Wild LQ<br />
Basil Ocimum basilicum L. Lamiaceae Herb Cult LQ<br />
Bay Pimenta racemosa Moore Myrtaceae Leaf Cult LQ<br />
Bergamot Citrus aurantium L. subsp. Rutaceae Fruit peel Cult MQ<br />
bergamia (Risso et Poit.) Engl.<br />
Birch tar Betula pendula Roth. (syn. Betulaceae Bark/wood Wild LQ<br />
Betula verrucosa Erhart. Betula<br />
alba sensu H.J.Coste. non L.)<br />
Buchu leaf Agathosma betulina (Bergius) Rutaceae Leaf Wild LQ<br />
Pillans. A. crenulata (L.)<br />
Pillans<br />
Cade Juniperus oxycedrus L. Cupressaceae Wood Wild LQ<br />
Cajuput Melaleuca leuc<strong>and</strong>endron L. Myrtaceae Leaf Wild LQ<br />
Calamus Acorus calamus L. Araceae Rhizome Cult/wild LQ<br />
Camphor Cinnamomum camphora L. Lauraceae Wood Cult LQ<br />
(Sieb.)<br />
Cananga Cananga odorata Hook. f. et Annonaceae Flower Wild LQ<br />
Thoms.<br />
Caraway Carum carvi L. Apiaceae Seed Cult LQ<br />
Cardamom Elettaria cardamomum (L.) Zingiberaceae Seed Cult LQ<br />
Maton<br />
Carrot seed Daucus carota L. Apiaceae Seed Cult LQ<br />
Cascarilla Croton eluteria (L.) W.Wright Euphorbiaceae Bark Wild LQ<br />
Cedarwood, Cupressus funebris Endl. Cupressaceae Wood Wild MQ<br />
Chinese<br />
Cedarwood, Juniperus mexicana Schiede Cupressaceae Wood Wild MQ<br />
Texas<br />
Cedarwood, Juniperus virginiana L. Cupressaceae Wood Wild MQ<br />
Virginia<br />
Celery seed Apium graveolens L. Apiaceae Seed Cult LQ<br />
Chamomile Matricaria recutita L. Asteraceae Flower Cult LQ<br />
Chamomile, Anthemis nobilis L. Asteraceae Flower Cult LQ<br />
Roman<br />
Chenopodium Chenopodium ambrosioides (L.) Chenopodiaceae Seed Cult LQ<br />
Gray<br />
Cinnamon bark, Cinnamomum zeylanicum Nees Lauraceae Bark Cult LQ<br />
Ceylon<br />
Cinnamon bark, Cinnamomum cassia Blume Lauraceae Bark Cult LQ<br />
Chinese<br />
Cinnamon leaf Cinnamomum zeylanicum Nees Lauraceae Leaf Cult LQ<br />
continued
56 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 3.7 (continued)<br />
Important <strong>Essential</strong> Oil-Bearing Plants—Common <strong>and</strong> Botanical Names Incl. Family,<br />
Plant Parts Used, Raw Material Origin, <strong>and</strong> Trade Quantities <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Essential</strong> Oil<br />
Trade Name Species Plant Family<br />
Used Plant<br />
Part(s)<br />
Wild Collection/<br />
Cultivation<br />
Trade<br />
Quantities a<br />
Citronella,<br />
Ceylon<br />
Cymbopogon nardus (L.)<br />
W. Wats.<br />
Poaceae Leaf Cult HQ<br />
Citronella, Java Cymbopogon winterianus Jowitt. Poaceae Leaf Cult HQ<br />
Clary sage Salvia sclarea L. Lamiaceae Flowering Cult<br />
MQ<br />
herb<br />
Clove buds Syzygium aromaticum (L.) Myrtaceae Leaf/bud Cult LQ<br />
Merill et L.M. Perry<br />
Clove leaf Syzygium aromaticum (L.) Myrtaceae Leaf Cult HQ<br />
Merill et L.M. Perry<br />
Cori<strong>and</strong>er Cori<strong>and</strong>rum sativum L. Apiaceae Fruit Cult LQ<br />
Cornmint Mentha canadensis L. (syn. Lamiaceae Leaf Cult HQ<br />
M. arvensis L. f. piperascens<br />
Malinv. ex Holmes; M. arvensis<br />
L. var. glabrata. M. haplocalyx<br />
Briq.; M. sachalinensis (Briq.)<br />
Kudo)<br />
Cumin Cuminum cyminum L. Apiaceae Fruit Cult LQ<br />
Cypress Cupressus sempervirens L. Cupressaeae Leaf/twig Wild LQ<br />
Davana Artemisia pallens Wall. Asteraceae Flowering Cult<br />
LQ<br />
herb<br />
Dill Anethum graveolens L. Apiaceae Herb/fruit Cult LQ<br />
Dill, India Anethum sowa Roxb. Apiaceae Fruit Cult LQ<br />
Elemi Canarium luzonicum Miq. Burseraceae Resin Wild LQ<br />
Eucalyptus Eucalyptus globulus Labill. Myrtaceae Leaf Cult/wild HQ<br />
Eucalyptus, Eucalyptus citriodora Hook. Myrtaceae Leaf Cult/wild HQ<br />
lemon-scented<br />
Fennel bitter Foeniculum vulgare Mill. subsp. Apiaceae Fruit Cult LQ<br />
vulgare var. vulgare<br />
Fennel sweet Foeniculum vulgare Mill. subsp. Apiaceae Fruit Cult LQ<br />
vulgare var. dulce<br />
Fir needle, Abies balsamea Mill. Pinaceae Leaf/twig Wild LQ<br />
Canadian<br />
Fir needle, Abies sibirica Ledeb. Pinaceae Leaf/twig Wild LQ<br />
Siberian<br />
Gaiac Guaiacum <strong>of</strong>fi cinale L. Zygophyllaceae Resin Wild LQ<br />
Galbanum Ferula galbanifl ua Boiss. Apiaceae Resin Wild LQ<br />
F. rubricaulis Boiss.<br />
Garlic Allium sativum L. Alliaceae Bulb Cult LQ<br />
Geranium Pelargonium spp. Geraniaceae Leaf Cult MQ<br />
Ginger Zingiber <strong>of</strong>fi cinale Roscoe Zingiberaceae Rhizome Cult LQ<br />
Gingergrass Cymbopogon martinii (Roxb.) Poaceae Leaf Cult/wild<br />
H. Wats var. s<strong>of</strong>i a Burk<br />
Grapefruit Citrus × paradisi Macfad. Rutaceae Fruit peel Cult LQ<br />
Guaiacwood Bulnesia sarmienti L. Zygophyllaceae Wood Wild MQ<br />
Gurjum Dipterocarpus spp. Dipterocarpaceae Resin Wild LQ<br />
Hop Humulus lupulus L. Cannabaceae Flower Cult LQ<br />
Hyssop Hyssopus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L. Lamiaceae Leaf Cult LQ<br />
continued
Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 57<br />
TABLE 3.7 (continued)<br />
Important <strong>Essential</strong> Oil-Bearing Plants—Common <strong>and</strong> Botanical Names Incl. Family,<br />
Plant Parts Used, Raw Material Origin, <strong>and</strong> Trade Quantities <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Essential</strong> Oil<br />
Trade Name Species Plant Family<br />
Used Plant<br />
Part(s)<br />
Wild Collection/<br />
Cultivation<br />
Trade<br />
Quantities a<br />
Juniper berry Juniperus communis L. Cupressaceae Fruit Wild LQ<br />
Laurel leaf Laurus nobilis L. Lauraceae Leaf Cult/wild LQ<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>in Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia Mill. × Lamiaceae Leaf Cult HQ<br />
L. latifolia Medik.<br />
Lavender Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia Miller Lamiaceae Leaf Cult MQ<br />
Lavender, Spike Lav<strong>and</strong>ula latifolia Medik. Lamiaceae Flower Cult LQ<br />
Lemon Citrus limon (L.) Burman fil. Rutaceae Fruit peel Cult HQ<br />
Lemongrass,<br />
Indian<br />
Lemongrass, West<br />
Indian<br />
Lime distilled<br />
Cymbopogon fl exuosus<br />
(Nees ex Steud.) H. Wats.<br />
Cymbopogon citratus (DC.)<br />
Stapf<br />
Citrus aurantiifolia (Christm. et<br />
Panz.) Swingle<br />
Poaceae Leaf Cult LQ<br />
Poaceae Leaf Cult LQ<br />
Rutaceae Fruit Cult HQ<br />
Litsea cubeba Litsea cubeba C.H. Persoon Lauraceae Fruit/leaf Cult MQ<br />
Lovage root Levisticum <strong>of</strong>fi cinale Koch Apiaceae Root Cult LQ<br />
M<strong>and</strong>arin Citrus reticulata Blanco Rutaceae Fruit peel Cult MQ<br />
Marjoram Origanum majorana L. Lamiaceae Herb Cult LQ<br />
Mugwort Artemisia vulgaris L. Asteraceae Herb Cult/wild LQ<br />
common<br />
Mugwort, Roman Artemisia pontica L. Asteraceae Herb Cult/wild LQ<br />
Myrtle Myrtus communis L. Myrtaceae Leaf Cult/wild LQ<br />
Neroli<br />
Citrus aurantium L. subsp. Rutaceae Flower Cult LQ<br />
aurantium<br />
Niaouli Melaleuca viridifl ora Myrtaceae Leaf Cult/wild LQ<br />
Nutmeg Myristica fragrans Houtt. Myristicaceae Seed Cult LQ<br />
Onion Allium cepa L. Alliaceae Bulb Cult LQ<br />
Orange Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck Rutaceae Fruit peel Cult HQ<br />
Orange bitter Citrus aurantium L. Rutaceae Fruit peel Cult LQ<br />
Oregano Origanum spp.. Thymbra spicata Lamiaceae Herb Cult/wild LQ<br />
L.. Coridothymus capitatus<br />
Rechb. fil.. Satureja spp. Lippia<br />
graveolens<br />
Palmarosa Cymbopogon martinii (Roxb.) Poaceae Leaf Cult LQ<br />
H. Wats var. motia Burk<br />
Parsley seed Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) Apiaceae Fruit Cult LQ<br />
Nym. ex A.W. Hill<br />
Patchouli Pogostemon cablin (Blanco) Lamiaceae Leaf Cult HQ<br />
Benth.<br />
Pennyroyal Mentha pulegium L. Lamiaceae Herb Cult LQ<br />
Pepper Piper nigrum L. Piperaceae Fruit Cult LQ<br />
Peppermint Mentha x piperita L. Lamiaceae Leaf Cult HQ<br />
Petitgrain Citrus aurantium L. subsp. Rutaceae Leaf Cult LQ<br />
aurantium<br />
Pimento leaf Pimenta dioica (L.) Merr. Myrtaceae Fruit Cult LQ<br />
Pine needle Pinus silvestris L.. P. nigra Arnold Pinaceae Leaf/twig Wild LQ<br />
Pine needle, Dwarf Pinus mugo Turra Pinaceae Leaf/twig Wild LQ<br />
Pine silvestris Pinus silvestris L. Pinaceae Leaf/twig Wild LQ<br />
continued
58 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 3.7 (continued)<br />
Important <strong>Essential</strong> Oil-Bearing Plants—Common <strong>and</strong> Botanical Names Incl. Family,<br />
Plant Parts Used, Raw Material Origin, <strong>and</strong> Trade Quantities <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Essential</strong> Oil<br />
Trade Name Species Plant Family<br />
Used Plant<br />
Part(s)<br />
Wild Collection/<br />
Cultivation<br />
Trade<br />
Quantities a<br />
Pine white Pinus palustris Mill. Pinaceae Leaf/twig Wild LQ<br />
Rose Rosa x damascena Miller Rosaceae Flower Cult LQ<br />
Rosemary Rosmarinus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L. Lamiaceae Feaf Cult/wild LQ<br />
Rosewood Aniba rosaeodora Ducke Lauraceae Wood Wild LQ<br />
Rue Ruta graveolens L. Rutaceae Herb Cult LQ<br />
Sage, Dalmatian Salvia <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L. Lamiaceae Herb Cult/wild LQ<br />
Sage, Spanish Salvia lav<strong>and</strong>ulifolia L. Lamiaceae Leaf Cult LQ<br />
Sage, three lobed<br />
(Greek. Turkish)<br />
S<strong>and</strong>alwood, East<br />
Indian<br />
Sassafras, Brazilian<br />
(Ocotea<br />
cymbarum oil)<br />
Salvia fruticosa Mill. (syn. S. Lamiaceae Herb Cult/wild LQ<br />
triloba L.)<br />
Santalum album L. Santalaceae Wood Wild MQ<br />
Ocotea odorifera (Vell.) Rohwer<br />
[Ocotea pretiosa (Nees) Mez.]<br />
Lauraceae Wood Wild HQ<br />
Sassafras, Chinese Sassafras albidum (Nutt.) Nees. Lauraceae Root bark Wild HQ<br />
Savory<br />
Satureja hortensis L.. Satureja Lamiaceae Leaf Cult/wild LQ<br />
montana L.<br />
Spearmint, Native Mentha spicata L. Lamiaceae Leaf Cult MQ<br />
Spearmint, Scotch Mentha gracilis Sole Lamiaceae Leaf Cult HQ<br />
Star anise Illicium verum Hook fil. Illiciaceae Fruit Cult MQ<br />
Styrax Styrax <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L. Styracaceae Resin Wild LQ<br />
Tansy Tanacetum vulgare L. Asteraceae Flowering Cult/wild LQ<br />
herb<br />
Tarragon Artemisia dracunculus L. Asteraceae Herb Cult LQ<br />
Tea tree Melaleuca spp. Myrtaceae Leaf Cult LQ<br />
Thyme<br />
Thymus vulgaris L.. T. zygis Loefl. Lamiaceae Herb Cult LQ<br />
ex L.<br />
Valerian Valeriana <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L. Valerianaceae Root Cult LQ<br />
Vetiver Vetiveria zizanoides (L.) Nash Poaceae Root Cult MQ<br />
Wintergreen Gaultheria procumbens L. Ericaceae Leaf Wild LQ<br />
Wormwood Artemisia absinthium L. Asteraceae Herb Cult/wild LQ<br />
Ylang Ylang Cananga odorata Hook. f. et Thoms. Annonaceae Flower Cult MQ<br />
a<br />
HQ = High quantities (>1000 t/a); MQ = medium quantities (100–1000 t/a); LQ = low quantities (
Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 59<br />
• Some species are difficult to cultivate (slow growth rate <strong>and</strong> requirement <strong>of</strong> a special<br />
microclimate).<br />
• Market uncertainties or political circumstances do not allow investing in long-term<br />
cultivation.<br />
• The market is in favor <strong>of</strong> “ecological” or “natural” labeled wild collected material.<br />
Especially—but not only—in developing countries, parts <strong>of</strong> the rural population depend economically<br />
on gathering high-value plant material. Less than two decades ago, almost all oregano<br />
(crude drug as well as essential oil) worldwide came from wild collection (Padulosi, 1996) <strong>and</strong> even<br />
this well-known group <strong>of</strong> species (Origanum sp. <strong>and</strong> Lippia sp.) were counted under “neglected <strong>and</strong><br />
underutilized crops.”<br />
Yarrow (Achillea millefolium s.l.), arnica, <strong>and</strong> even chamomile originate still partly from wild<br />
collection in Central <strong>and</strong> Eastern Europe, <strong>and</strong> despite several attempts to cultivate spikenard<br />
(Valeriana celtica), a tiny European mountain plant with a high content <strong>of</strong> patchouli alcohol, this<br />
species is still wild gathered in Austria <strong>and</strong> Italy (Novak et al., 1998, 2000).<br />
To regulate the sustainable use <strong>of</strong> biodiversity by avoiding overharvesting, genetic erosion, <strong>and</strong><br />
habitat loss, international organizations such as IUCN (International Union for Conservation <strong>of</strong><br />
Nature), WWF/TRAFFIC, <strong>and</strong> World Health Organization (WHO) have launched together the<br />
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD, 2001), the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (CBD,<br />
2002), <strong>and</strong> the Guidelines for the Sustainable Use <strong>of</strong> Biodiversity (CBD, 2004). These principles <strong>and</strong><br />
recommendations address primarily the national <strong>and</strong> international policy level, but provide also the<br />
herbal industry <strong>and</strong> the collectors with specific guidance on sustainable sourcing practices (Leaman,<br />
2006). A st<strong>and</strong>ard for sustainable collection <strong>and</strong> use <strong>of</strong> medicinal <strong>and</strong> aromatic plants [the international<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ard on sustainable wild collection <strong>of</strong> medicinal <strong>and</strong> aromatic plants (ISSC-MAP)] was<br />
issued first in 2004 <strong>and</strong> its principles will be shown at the end <strong>of</strong> this chapter. This st<strong>and</strong>ard certifies<br />
wild-crafted plant material ins<strong>of</strong>ar as conservation <strong>and</strong> sustainability are concerned. Phytochemical<br />
quality cannot, however, be derived from it which is the reason for domestication <strong>and</strong> systematic<br />
cultivation <strong>of</strong> economically important essential oil plants.<br />
3.5.2 DOMESTICATION AND SYSTEMATIC CULTIVATION<br />
This <strong>of</strong>fers a number <strong>of</strong> advantages over wild harvest for the production <strong>of</strong> essential oils:<br />
• Avoidance <strong>of</strong> admixtures <strong>and</strong> adulterations by reliable botanical identification.<br />
• Better control <strong>of</strong> the harvested volumes.<br />
• Selection <strong>of</strong> genotypes with desirable traits, especially quality.<br />
• Controlled influence on the history <strong>of</strong> the plant material <strong>and</strong> on postharvest h<strong>and</strong>ling.<br />
On the other side, it needs arable l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> investments in starting material, maintenance, <strong>and</strong><br />
harvest techniques. On the basis <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> successful introductions <strong>of</strong> new crops a scheme <strong>and</strong><br />
strategy <strong>of</strong> domestication was developed by this author (Table 3.8).<br />
Recent examples <strong>of</strong> successful domestication <strong>of</strong> essential oil-bearing plants are oregano (Ceylan<br />
et al., 1994; Kitiki 1996; Putievsky et al., 1996), Lippia sp. (Fischer, 1998), Hyptis suaveolens<br />
(Grassi, 2003), <strong>and</strong> T. lucida (Goehler, 2006). Domesticating a new species starts with studies at the<br />
natural habitat. The most important steps are the exact botanical identification <strong>and</strong> the detailed<br />
description <strong>of</strong> the growing site. National Herbaria are in general helpful in this stage. In the course<br />
<strong>of</strong> collecting seeds <strong>and</strong> plant material, a first phytochemical screening will be necessary to recognize<br />
chemotypes (Fischer et al., 1996; Goehler et al., 1997). The phytosanitary <strong>of</strong> wild populations<br />
should also be observed so as to be informed in advance on specific pests <strong>and</strong> diseases. The flower<br />
heads <strong>of</strong> wild Arnica montana, for instance, are <strong>of</strong>ten damaged by the larvae <strong>of</strong> Tephritis arnicae<br />
(Fritzsche et al., 2007).
60 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 3.8<br />
Domestication Strategy for Plants <strong>of</strong> the Spontaneous Flora<br />
1. Studies at the natural habitat: botany, soil, climate, growing type, natural distribution <strong>and</strong><br />
propagation, natural enemies, pests <strong>and</strong> diseases<br />
2. Collection <strong>of</strong> the wild grown plants <strong>and</strong> seeds: establishment <strong>of</strong> a germplasm collection,<br />
ex situ conservation, phytochemical investigation (screening)<br />
3. Plant propagation: vegetatively or by seeds, plantlet cultivation; (biotechnol.: in vitro<br />
propagation)<br />
4. Genetic improvement: variability, selection, breeding; phytochemical investigation,<br />
biotechnology (in vitro techniques)<br />
Æ GPS to exactly localize<br />
the place<br />
Æ Biotechnol./in vitro<br />
Æ Biotechnol./in vitro<br />
5. Cultivation treatments: growing site, fertilization, crop maintenance, cultivation techniques<br />
6. Phytosanitary problems: pests, diseases Æ Biotechnol./in vitro<br />
7. Duration <strong>of</strong> the cultivation: harvest, postharvest h<strong>and</strong>ling, phytochemical control <strong>of</strong> the<br />
crop produced<br />
Æ Technical processes, solar<br />
energy (new techniques)<br />
8. Economic evaluation <strong>and</strong> calculation Æ New techniques<br />
Source: Modified from Franz, Ch., 1993c. Plant Res. Dev., 37: 101–111; Franz, Ch., 1993d. Proc. 12th Int. Congr. <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, Fragrances <strong>and</strong> Flavours, Vienna, pp. 27–44.<br />
The first phase <strong>of</strong> domestication results in a germplasm collection. In the next step, the appropriate<br />
propagation method has to be developed, which might be derived partly from observations at<br />
the natural habitat: while studying wild populations <strong>of</strong> T. lucida in Guatemala we found, besides<br />
appropriate seed set, also runners, which could be used for vegetative propagation <strong>of</strong> selected plants<br />
(Goehler et al., 1997). Wherever possible, propagation by seeds <strong>and</strong> direct sowing is however preferred<br />
due to economic reasons.<br />
The appropriate cultivation method depends on the plant type—annual or perennial, herb, vine,<br />
or tree—<strong>and</strong> on the agroecosystem into which the respective species should be introduced. In<br />
contrast to large-scale field production <strong>of</strong> herbal plants in temperate <strong>and</strong> Mediterranean zones,<br />
small-scale sustainable agr<strong>of</strong>oresty <strong>and</strong> mixed cropping systems adapted to the environment have<br />
the preference in tropical regions (Schippmann et al., 2006). Parallel to the cultivation trials dealing<br />
with all topics from plant nutrition <strong>and</strong> maintenance to harvesting <strong>and</strong> postharvest h<strong>and</strong>ling, the<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> the genetic resources <strong>and</strong> the genetic improvement <strong>of</strong> the plant material must be started<br />
to avoid developing <strong>of</strong> a detailed cultivation scheme with an undesired chemotype.<br />
3.5.3 FACTORS INFLUENCING THE PRODUCTION AND QUALITY OF ESSENTIAL<br />
OIL-BEARING PLANTS<br />
Since plant material is the product <strong>of</strong> a predominantly biological process, prerequisite <strong>of</strong> its productivity<br />
is the knowledge on the factors influencing it, <strong>of</strong> which the most important ones are<br />
1. The already discussed intraspecific chemical polymorphism, derived from it the biosynthesis<br />
<strong>and</strong> inheritance <strong>of</strong> the chemical features, <strong>and</strong> as consequence selection <strong>and</strong> breeding<br />
<strong>of</strong> new cultivars.<br />
2. The intraindividual variation between the plant parts <strong>and</strong> depending on the developmental<br />
stages (“morpho- <strong>and</strong> ontogenetic variation”).<br />
3. The modification due to environmental conditions including infection pressure <strong>and</strong><br />
immissions.<br />
4. Human influences by cultivation measures, for example, fertilizing, water supply, or pest<br />
management.
Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 61<br />
3.5.3.1 Genetic Variation <strong>and</strong> Plant Breeding<br />
Phenotypic variation in essential oils was detected very early because <strong>of</strong> their striking sensorial<br />
properties. Due to the high chemical diversity, a continuous selection <strong>of</strong> the desired chemotypes<br />
leads to rather homogenous <strong>and</strong> reproducible populations, as this is the case with the l<strong>and</strong>races<br />
<strong>and</strong> common varieties. But Murray <strong>and</strong> Reitsema (1954) stated already that “a plant breeding<br />
program requires a basic knowledge <strong>of</strong> the inheritance <strong>of</strong> at least the major essential oil compounds.”<br />
Such genetic studies have been performed over the last 50 years with a number <strong>of</strong> species<br />
especially <strong>of</strong> the mint family (e.g., Ocimum sp.: Sobti et al., 1978; Thymus vulgaris: Vernet,<br />
1976; Gouyon <strong>and</strong> Vernet, 1982; Perilla frutescens: Koezuka et al., 1986; Mentha sp.: Croteau,<br />
1991), <strong>of</strong> the Asteraceae/Compositae (Matricaria recutita: Horn et al., 1988; Massoud <strong>and</strong> Franz,<br />
1990), the genus (Eucalyptus: Brophy <strong>and</strong> Southwell, 2002; Doran, 2002), or the Vetiveria zizanioides<br />
(Akhila <strong>and</strong> Rani, 2002).<br />
The results achieved by inheritance studies have been partly applied in targeted breeding as<br />
shown exemplarily in Table 3.9. Apart from the essential oil content <strong>and</strong> composition there are<br />
also other targets to be observed when breeding essential oil plants, as particular morphological<br />
characters ensuring high <strong>and</strong> stable yields <strong>of</strong> the respective plant part, resistances to pest <strong>and</strong><br />
diseases as well as abiotic stress, low nutritional requirements to save production costs, appropriate<br />
homogeneity, <strong>and</strong> suitability for technological processes at harvest <strong>and</strong> postharvest, especially<br />
readiness for distillation (Pank, 2007). In general, the following breeding methods are commonly<br />
used (Franz, 1999).<br />
3.5.3.1.1 Selection by Exploiting the Natural Variability<br />
Since many essential oil-bearing species are in the transitional phase from wild plants to systematic<br />
cultivation, appropriate breeding progress can be achieved by simple selection. Wild collections or<br />
accessions <strong>of</strong> germplasm collections are the basis, <strong>and</strong> good results were obtained, for example,<br />
with Origanum sp. (Putievsky et al., 1997) in limited time <strong>and</strong> at low expenses.<br />
Individual plants showing the desired phenotype will be selected <strong>and</strong> either generatively or vegetatively<br />
propagated (individual selection), or positive or negative mass selection techniques can be<br />
applied. Selection is traditionally the most common method <strong>of</strong> genetic improvement <strong>and</strong> the majority<br />
<strong>of</strong> varieties <strong>and</strong> cultivars <strong>of</strong> essential oil crops have this background. Due to the fact, however,<br />
that almost all <strong>of</strong> the respective plant species are allogamous, a recurrent selection is necessary to<br />
maintain the varietal traits, <strong>and</strong> this has especially to be considered if other varieties or wild populations<br />
<strong>of</strong> the same species are nearby <strong>and</strong> uncontrolled cross pollination may occur.<br />
The efficacy <strong>of</strong> selection has been shown by examples <strong>of</strong> many species, for instance, <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Lamiaceae family, starting from “Mitcham” peppermint <strong>and</strong> derived varieties (Lawrence, 2007),<br />
basil (Elementi et al., 2006), sage (Bezzi, 1994; Bernáth, 2000) to thyme (Rey, 1993). It is a wellknown<br />
method also in the breeding <strong>of</strong> caraway (Pank et al., 1996) <strong>and</strong> fennel (Desmarest, 1992) as<br />
well as <strong>of</strong> tropical <strong>and</strong> subtropical species such as palmarosa grass (Kulkarni, 1990), tea tree<br />
(Taylor, 1996), <strong>and</strong> eucalyptus (Doran, 2002). At perennial herbs, shrubs, <strong>and</strong> trees clone breeding,<br />
that is, the vegetative propagation <strong>of</strong> selected high-performance individual plants, is the method <strong>of</strong><br />
choice, especially in sterile or not type-true hybrids, for example, peppermint (Mentha × piperita)<br />
or lav<strong>and</strong>in (Lav<strong>and</strong>ula × hybrida). But this method is <strong>of</strong>ten applied also at sage (Bazina et al.,<br />
2002), rosemary (Mulas et al., 2002), lemongrass (Kulkarni <strong>and</strong> Ramesh, 1992), pepper, cinnamon,<br />
<strong>and</strong> nutmeg (Nair, 1982), <strong>and</strong> many other species.<br />
3.5.3.1.2 Breeding with Extended Variability (Combination Breeding)<br />
If different desired characters are located in different individuals/genotypes <strong>of</strong> the same or a closely<br />
related crossable species, crossings are made followed by selection <strong>of</strong> the respective combination<br />
products. Artificial crossings are performed by transferring the paternal pollen to the stigma <strong>of</strong> the<br />
female (emasculated) or male sterile maternal flower. In the segregating progenies individuals with
62 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 3.9<br />
Some Registered Cultivars <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Plant<br />
Species Cultivar/Variety Country<br />
Year <strong>of</strong><br />
Registration Breeding Method Specific Characters<br />
Achillea collina SPAK CH 1994 Crossing High in proazulene<br />
Angelica archangelica VS 2 FR 1996 Recurrent pedigree <strong>Essential</strong> oil index <strong>of</strong> roots: 180<br />
Foeniculum vulgare Fönicia HU 1998 Selection High anethole<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>ula <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis Rapido FR 1999 Polycross High essential oil,<br />
high linalyl acetate<br />
Levisticum <strong>of</strong>fi cinale Amor PL 2000 Selection High essential oil<br />
Matricaria recutita Mabamille DE 1995 Tetraploid High a-bisabolol<br />
Ciclo-1 IT 2000 Line breeding High chamazulene<br />
Lutea SK 1995 Tetraploid High a-bisabolol<br />
Melissa <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis Ildikó HU 1998 Selection High essential oil,<br />
Citral A + B, linalool<br />
L<strong>and</strong>or CH 1994 Selection High essential oil<br />
Lemona DE 2001 Selection High essential oil, citral<br />
Mentha piperita Todd’s Mitcham USA 1972 Mutation Wilt resistant<br />
Kubanskaja RUS 1980ies Crossing <strong>and</strong> polyploid High essential oil, high menthol<br />
Mentha spicata MSH-20 DK 2000 Recurrent pedigree High menthol, good flavor<br />
Ocimum basilicum Greco IT 2000 Synthetic Flavor<br />
Perri ISR 1999 Cross-breeding Fusarium Resistant<br />
Cardinal ISR 2000 Cross-breeding<br />
Origanum syriacum Senköy TR 1992 Selection 5% essential oil,<br />
60% carvacrol<br />
Carmeli ISR 1999 Selection Carvacrol<br />
Tavor ISR 1999 Selection Thymol<br />
Origanum onites GR 2000 Selfing Carvacrol<br />
Origanum hirtum GR 2000 Selfing Carvacrol<br />
Vulkan DE 2002 Crossing Carvacrol<br />
Carva CH 2002 Crossing Carvacrol<br />
Darpman TR 1992 Selection 2.5% essential oil,<br />
55% carvacrol<br />
Origanum majorana Erfo DE 1997 Crossing High essential oil,<br />
(Majorana hortensis) Tetrata DE 1999 Ployploid Cis-sabinene-hydrate<br />
G 1 FR 1998 Polycross<br />
Salvia <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis Moran ISR 1998 Crossing Herb yield<br />
Syn 1 IT 2004 Synthetic a-Thujone<br />
Thymus vulgaris Varico CH 1994 Selection Thymol/carvacrol<br />
T-16 DK 2000 Recurrent pedigree Thymol<br />
Virginia ISR 2000 Selection Herb yield<br />
the desired combination will be selected <strong>and</strong> bred to constancy, as exemplarily described for fennel<br />
<strong>and</strong> marjoram by Pank (2002).<br />
Hybrid breeding—common in large-scale agricultural crops, for example, maize—was introduced<br />
into essential oil plants over the last decade only. The advantage <strong>of</strong> hybrids on the one side<br />
is that the F 1 generation exceeds the parent lines in performance due to hybrid vigor <strong>and</strong> uniformity<br />
(“heterosis effect”) <strong>and</strong> on the other side it protects the plant breeder by segregating <strong>of</strong> the<br />
F 2 <strong>and</strong> following generations in heterogeneous low-value populations. But it needs as precondition
Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 63<br />
separate (inbred) parent lines <strong>of</strong> which one has to be male sterile <strong>and</strong> one male fertile with good<br />
combining ability.<br />
In addition, a male fertile “maintainer” line is needed to maintain the mother line. Few examples<br />
<strong>of</strong> F 1 hybrid breeding are known especially at Lamiaceae since male sterile individuals are<br />
found frequently in these species (Rey, 1994; Novak et al., 2002; Langbehn et al., 2002; Pank<br />
et al., 2002).<br />
Synthetic varieties are based on several (more than two) well-combining parental lines or clones<br />
which are grown together in a polycross scheme with open pollination for seed production. The<br />
uniformity <strong>and</strong> performance is not as high as at F 1 hybrids but the method is simpler <strong>and</strong> cheaper<br />
<strong>and</strong> the seed quality acceptable for crop production until the second or third generation. Synthetic<br />
cultivars are known for chamomile (Franz et al., 1985), arnica (Daniel <strong>and</strong> Bomme, 1991), marjoram<br />
(Franz <strong>and</strong> Novak, 1997), sage (Aiello et al., 2001), or caraway (Pank et al., 2007).<br />
3.5.3.1.3 Breeding with Artificially Generated New Variability<br />
Induced mutations by application <strong>of</strong> mutagenic chemicals or ionizing radiation open the possibility<br />
to find new trait expressions. Although quite <strong>of</strong>ten applied, such experiments are confronted with the<br />
disadvantages <strong>of</strong> undirected <strong>and</strong> incalculable results, <strong>and</strong> achieving a desired mutation is <strong>of</strong>ten like<br />
searching for a needle in a haystack. Nevertheless, remarkable achievements are several colchicineinduced<br />
polyploid varieties <strong>of</strong> peppermint (Murray, 1969; Lawrence, 2007), chamomile (Czabajska<br />
et al., 1978; Franz et al., 1983; Repčak et al., 1992), <strong>and</strong> lavender (Slavova et al., 2004).<br />
Further possibilities to obtain mutants are studies <strong>of</strong> the somaclonal variation <strong>of</strong> in vitro cultures<br />
since abiotic stress in cell <strong>and</strong> tissue cultures induces also mutagenesis. Finally, genetic engineering<br />
opens new fields <strong>and</strong> potentialities to generate new variability <strong>and</strong> to introduce new traits by gene<br />
transfer. Except research on biosynthetic pathways <strong>of</strong> interesting essential oil compounds genetic<br />
engineering, GMO’s <strong>and</strong> transgenic cultivars are until now without practical significance in essential<br />
oil crops <strong>and</strong> also not (yet) accepted by the consumer.<br />
As regards the different traits, besides morphological, technological, <strong>and</strong> yield characteristics as<br />
well as quantity <strong>and</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> the essential oil, also stress resistance <strong>and</strong> resistance to pests<br />
<strong>and</strong> diseases are highly relevant targets in breeding <strong>of</strong> essential oil plants. Well known in this<br />
respect are breeding efforts against mint rust (Puccinia menthae) <strong>and</strong> wilt (Verticillium dahliae)<br />
resulting in the peppermint varieties “Multimentha,” “Prilukskaja,” or “Todd’s Mitcham” (Murray<br />
<strong>and</strong> Todd, 1972; Pank, 2007; Lawrence, 2007), the development <strong>of</strong> Fusarium-wilt <strong>and</strong> Peronospora<br />
resistant cultivars <strong>of</strong> basil (Dudai, 2006; Minuto et al., 2006), or resistance breeding against Septoria<br />
petroselini in parsley <strong>and</strong> related species (Marthe <strong>and</strong> Scholze, 1996). An overview on this topic is<br />
given by Gabler (2002).<br />
3.5.3.2 Plant Breeding <strong>and</strong> Intellectual Property Rights<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oil plants are biological, cultural, <strong>and</strong> technological resources. They can be found in nature<br />
gathered from the wild or developed through domestication <strong>and</strong> plant breeding. As long as the plant<br />
material is wild collected <strong>and</strong> traditionally used, it is part <strong>of</strong> the cultural heritage without any individual<br />
intellectual property <strong>and</strong> therefore not possible to protect, for example, by patents. Even<br />
finding a new plant or substance is a discovery in the “natural nature” <strong>and</strong> not an invention since a<br />
technical teaching is missing. Intellectual property, however, can be granted to new applications<br />
that involve an inventive step. Which consequences can be drawn from these facts for the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> novel essential oil plants <strong>and</strong> new selections or cultivars?<br />
Selection <strong>and</strong> genetic improvement <strong>of</strong> aromatic plants <strong>and</strong> essential oil crops is not only time<br />
consuming but also rather expensive due to the necessity <strong>of</strong> comprehensive phytochemical <strong>and</strong> possibly<br />
molecular biological investigations. In addition, with few exceptions (e.g., mints, lavender <strong>and</strong><br />
lav<strong>and</strong>in, parsley but also Cymbopogon sp., black pepper, or cloves) the acreage per species is rather<br />
limited in comparison with conventional agricultural <strong>and</strong> horticultural crops. And finally, there are<br />
several “fashion crops” with market uncertainties concerning their longevity or half-life period,
64 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
respectively. The generally unfavorable cost: benefit ratio to be taken into consideration makes<br />
essential oil plant breeding economically risky <strong>and</strong> there is no incentive for plant breeders unless a<br />
sufficiently strong plant intellectual property right (IPR) exists. Questioning “which protection,<br />
which property right for which variety?” <strong>of</strong>fers two options (Franz, 2001).<br />
3.5.3.2.1 Plant Variety Protection<br />
By conventional methods bred plant groupings that collectively are distinct from other known varieties<br />
<strong>and</strong> are uniform <strong>and</strong> stable following repeated reproduction can be protected by way <strong>of</strong> plant<br />
breeder’s rights. Basis is the International Convention for the Protection <strong>of</strong> New Varieties initially<br />
issued by UPOV (Union for the Protection <strong>of</strong> New Varieties <strong>of</strong> Plants) in 1961 <strong>and</strong> changed in 1991.<br />
A plant breeder’s right is a legal title granting its holder the exclusive right to produce reproductive<br />
material <strong>of</strong> his plant variety for commercial purposes <strong>and</strong> to sell this material within a particular<br />
territory for up to 30 years (trees <strong>and</strong> shrubs) or 25 years (all other plants). A further precondition is<br />
the “commercial novelty,” that is, it must not have been sold commercially prior to the filing date.<br />
Distinctness, uniformity, <strong>and</strong> stability (DUS) refer to morphological (leaf shape, flower color, etc.)<br />
or physiological (winter hardiness, disease resistance, etc.), but not phytochemical characteristics,<br />
for example, essential oil content or composition. Such “value for cultivation <strong>and</strong> use (VCU) characteristics”<br />
will not be examined <strong>and</strong> are therefore not protected by plant breeder’s rights (Franz,<br />
2001; Llewelyn, 2002; Van Overwalle, 2006).<br />
3.5.3.2.2 Patent Protection (Plant Patents)<br />
Generally speaking, patentable are inventions (not discoveries!) that are novel, involve an innovative<br />
step, <strong>and</strong> are susceptible to industrial application, including agriculture. Plant varieties or<br />
essentially biological processes for the production <strong>of</strong> plants are explicitly excluded from patenting.<br />
But other groupings <strong>of</strong> plants that fall neither under the term “variety” nor under “natural nature”<br />
are possible to be protected by patents. This is especially important for plant groupings with novel<br />
phytochemical composition or novel application combined with an inventive step, for example,<br />
genetical modification, a technologically new production method or a novel type <strong>of</strong> isolation<br />
(product by process protection).<br />
Especially for wild plants <strong>and</strong> essentially allogamous plants not fulfilling DUS for cultivated<br />
varieties (cultivars) <strong>and</strong> plants where the phytochemical characteristics are more important than the<br />
morphological ones, plant patents <strong>of</strong>fer an interesting alternative to plant variety protection (PVP)<br />
(Table 3.10).<br />
TABLE 3.10<br />
Advantages <strong>and</strong> Disadvantages <strong>of</strong> PVP versus Patent Protection <strong>of</strong> Specialist<br />
Minor Crops (Medicinal <strong>and</strong> Aromatic Plants)<br />
PVP<br />
Beginning <strong>of</strong> protection: registration date<br />
Restricted to “varieties”<br />
Requirements: DUS = distinctness, uniformity,<br />
stability<br />
Free choice <strong>of</strong> characters to be used for DUS by<br />
PVO (Plant Variety Office)<br />
Phenotypical. Mainly morphological characters<br />
(phytochemicals <strong>of</strong> minor importance)<br />
Value for cultivation <strong>and</strong> use characteristics<br />
(VCU) not protected<br />
Patent<br />
Beginning <strong>of</strong> protection: application date<br />
“Varieties” not patentable, but any other grouping <strong>of</strong> plants<br />
Requirements: novelty, inventive step, industrial applicability (=NIA)<br />
Repeatability obligatory, product by process option<br />
“<strong>Essential</strong>ly biological process” not patentable<br />
“Natural nature” not patentable<br />
Claims (e.g., phytochemical characters) depend on applicant<br />
Phytochemical characters <strong>and</strong> use/application (VCU) patentable
Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 65<br />
In conformity with the UPOV Convention <strong>of</strong> 1991 (http://www.upov.int/en/publications/<br />
conventions/1991/content.htm)<br />
• A strong plant IPR is requested.<br />
• Chemical markers (e.g., secondary plant products) must be accepted as protectable<br />
characteristics.<br />
• Strong depending rights for essentially derived varieties are needed since it is easy to<br />
plagiarize such crops.<br />
• “Double protection” would be very useful (i.e., free decision by the breeder if PVR or<br />
patent protection is applied).<br />
• But also researchers exemption <strong>and</strong> breeders privilege with fair access to genotypes for<br />
further development is necessary.<br />
Strong protection does not hinder usage <strong>and</strong> development; it depends on a fair arrangement only<br />
(Le Buanec, 2001).<br />
3.5.3.3 Intraindividual Variation between Plant Parts <strong>and</strong> Depending on the<br />
Developmental Stage (Morpho- <strong>and</strong> Ontogenetic Variation)<br />
The formation <strong>of</strong> essential oils depends on the tissue differentiation (secretory cells <strong>and</strong> excretion<br />
cavities, as discussed above in the introduction to this chapter) <strong>and</strong> on the ontogenetic phase <strong>of</strong> the<br />
respective plant. The knowledge on these facts is necessary to harvest the correct plant parts at the<br />
right time.<br />
Regarding the differences between plant parts, it is known from cinnamon (Cinnamomum<br />
zeylanicum) that the root-, stem-, <strong>and</strong> leaf oils differ significantly (Wijesekera et al., 1974): only the<br />
stem bark contains an essential oil with up to 70% cinnamaldehyde, whereas the oil <strong>of</strong> the root bark<br />
consists mainly <strong>of</strong> camphor <strong>and</strong> linalool, <strong>and</strong> the leaves produce oils with eugenol as main compound.<br />
In contrast to it, eugenol forms with 70–90% the main compound in stem, leaf, <strong>and</strong> bud oils<br />
<strong>of</strong> cloves (Syzygium aromaticum) (Lawrence, 1978). This was recently confirmed by Srivastava<br />
et al. (2005) for clove oils from India <strong>and</strong> Madagascar, stating in addition that eugenyl acetate was<br />
found in buds up to 8% but in leaves between traces <strong>and</strong> 1.6% only. The second main substance<br />
in leaves as well as buds is b-caryophyllene with up to 20% <strong>of</strong> the essential oil. In Aframomum<br />
giganteum (Zingiberaceae), the rhizome essential oil consists <strong>of</strong> b-caryophyllene, its oxide, <strong>and</strong><br />
derivatives mainly, whereas in the leaf oil terpentine-4-ol <strong>and</strong> pinocarvone form the principal<br />
components (Agnaniet et al., 2004).<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils <strong>of</strong> the Rutaceae family, especially citrus oils, are widely used as flavors <strong>and</strong><br />
fragrances depending on the plant part <strong>and</strong> species: in lime leaves neral/geranial <strong>and</strong> nerol/geraniol<br />
are prevailing, whereas grapefruit leaf oil consists <strong>of</strong> sabinene <strong>and</strong> b-ocimene mainly. The peel <strong>of</strong><br />
grapefruit contains almost limonene only <strong>and</strong> some myrcene, but lime peel oil shows a composition<br />
<strong>of</strong> b-pinene, g-terpinene, <strong>and</strong> limonene (Gancel et al., 2002). In Phellodendron sp., Lis et al. (2004,<br />
2006) found that in flower <strong>and</strong> fruit oils limonene <strong>and</strong> myrcene are dominating; in leaf oils, in contrast,<br />
a-farnesene, b-elemol, or b-ocimene, are prevailing.<br />
Differences in the essential oil composition between the plant parts <strong>of</strong> many Umbelliferae<br />
(Apiaceae) have exhaustively been studied by the group <strong>of</strong> Kubeczka, summarized by Kubeczka<br />
et al. (1982) <strong>and</strong> Kubeczka (1997). For instance, the comparison <strong>of</strong> the essential fruit oil <strong>of</strong> aniseed<br />
(Pimpinella anisum) with the oils <strong>of</strong> the herb <strong>and</strong> the root revealed significant differences (Kubeczka<br />
et al., 1986). Contrary to the fruit oil consisting <strong>of</strong> almost trans-anethole only (95%), the essential<br />
oil <strong>of</strong> the herb contains besides anethole, considerable amounts <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, for<br />
example, germacrene D, b-bisabolene, <strong>and</strong> a-zingiberene. Also pseudoisoeugenyl-2-methylbutyrate<br />
<strong>and</strong> epoxi-pseudoisoeugenyl-2-methylbutyrate together form almost 20% main compounds <strong>of</strong> the<br />
herb oil, but only 8.5% in the root <strong>and</strong> 1% in the fruit oil. The root essential oil is characterized by
66 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
a high content <strong>of</strong> b-bisabolene, geijerene, <strong>and</strong> pregeijerene <strong>and</strong> contains only small amounts <strong>of</strong><br />
trans-anethole (3.5%). Recently, Velasco-Neguerela et al. (2002) investigated the essential oil composition<br />
in the different plant parts <strong>of</strong> Pimpinella cumbrae from Canary Isl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> found in all<br />
above-ground parts a-bisabolol as main compound besides <strong>of</strong> d-3-carene, limonene, <strong>and</strong> others,<br />
whereas the root oil contains mainly isokessane, geijerene, isogeijerene, dihydroagar<strong>of</strong>uran, <strong>and</strong><br />
proazulenes—the latter is also found in Pimpinella nigra (Kubeczka et al., 1986). Pseudoisoeugenyl<br />
esters, known as chemosystematic characters <strong>of</strong> the genus Pimpinella, have been detected in small<br />
concentrations in all organs except leaves.<br />
Finally, Kurowska <strong>and</strong> Galazka (2006) compared the seed oils <strong>of</strong> root <strong>and</strong> leaf parsley cultivars<br />
marketed in Pol<strong>and</strong>. Root parsley seeds contained an essential oil with high concentrations <strong>of</strong> apiole<br />
<strong>and</strong> some lower percentages <strong>of</strong> myristicin. In leaf parsley seeds, in contrast, the content <strong>of</strong> myristicin<br />
was in general higher than apiole, <strong>and</strong> a clear differentiation between flat leaved cultivars showing<br />
still higher concentrations <strong>of</strong> apiole <strong>and</strong> curled cultivars with only traces <strong>of</strong> apiole could be<br />
observed. Allyltetramethoxybenzene as the third marker was found in leaf parsley seeds up to<br />
12.8%, in root parsley seeds, however, in traces only. Much earlier, Franz <strong>and</strong> Glasl (1976) had published<br />
already similar results on parsley seed oils comparing them with the essential oil composition<br />
<strong>of</strong> the other plant parts (Figure 3.8). Leaf oils gave almost the same fingerprint than the seeds with<br />
high myristicin in curled leaves, some apiole in flat leaves, <strong>and</strong> higher apiole concentrations than<br />
myristicin in the leaves <strong>of</strong> root varieties. In all root samples, however, apiole dominated largely over<br />
myristicin. It is therefore possible to identify the parsley type by analyzing a small seed sample.<br />
As shown already by Figueiredo et al. (1997), in the major number <strong>of</strong> essential oil-bearing species<br />
the oil composition differs significantly between the plant parts, but there are also plant species—as<br />
mentioned before, for example, cloves—which form a rather similar oil composition in each plant<br />
organ. Detailed knowledge in this matter is needed to decide, for instance how exact the separation<br />
<strong>of</strong> plant parts has to be performed before further processing (e.g., distillation) or use.<br />
Ess. oil % in dm % in ess. oil Myristicin Apiole<br />
0.9<br />
0.6<br />
0.3<br />
75<br />
50<br />
25<br />
0.9<br />
0.6<br />
0.3<br />
75<br />
50<br />
25<br />
0.9<br />
0.6<br />
0.3<br />
75<br />
50<br />
25<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />
FIGURE 3.8 Differences in the essential oil <strong>of</strong> fruits, leaves <strong>and</strong> roots <strong>of</strong> parsley cultivars (Petroselinum<br />
crispum (Mill.) Nyman); (left: ess. oil content, right: content <strong>of</strong> myristicin <strong>and</strong> apiole in the ess. oil. 1,2: flat<br />
leaved cv’s, 3–7 curled leaves cv’s, 7 root parsley).
Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 67<br />
Another topic to be taken into consideration is the developmental stage <strong>of</strong> the plant <strong>and</strong> the plant<br />
organs, since the formation <strong>of</strong> essential oils is phase dependent. In most cases, there is a significant<br />
increase <strong>of</strong> the essential oil production throughout the whole vegetative development.<br />
And especially in the generative phase between flower bud formation <strong>and</strong> full flowering, or until<br />
fruit or seed setting, remarkable changes in the oil yield <strong>and</strong> compositions can be observed.<br />
Obviously, a strong correlation is given between formation <strong>of</strong> secretory structures (oil gl<strong>and</strong>s, ducts,<br />
etc.) <strong>and</strong> essential oil biosynthesis, <strong>and</strong> different maturation stages, are associated with, for example,<br />
higher rates <strong>of</strong> cyclization or increase <strong>of</strong> oxygenated compounds (Figueiredo et al., 1997).<br />
Investigations on the ontogenesis <strong>of</strong> fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) revealed that the best time<br />
for picking fennel seeds is the phase <strong>of</strong> full ripeness due to the fact that the anethole content increases<br />
from
68 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
There is an extensive literature on ontogenesis <strong>and</strong> seasonal variation <strong>of</strong> Labiatae essential oils.<br />
Especially for this plant family, great differences are reported on the essential oil content <strong>and</strong> composition<br />
<strong>of</strong> young <strong>and</strong> mature leaves <strong>and</strong> the flowers may in addition influence the oil quality significantly.<br />
Usually, young leaves show higher essential oil contents per area unit compared to old leaves.<br />
But the highest oil yield is reached at the flowering period, which is the reason that most <strong>of</strong> the oils<br />
are produced from flowering plants. According to Werker et al. (1993) young basil (O. basilicum)<br />
leaves contained 0.55% essential oil while the content <strong>of</strong> mature leaves was only 0.13%. The same is<br />
also valid to a smaller extent for O. sanctum, where the essential oil decreases from young (0.54%)<br />
to senescing leaves (0.38%) (Dey <strong>and</strong> Choudhuri, 1983). Testing a number <strong>of</strong> basil cultivars mainly<br />
<strong>of</strong> the linalool chemotype, Macchia et al. (2006) found that only some <strong>of</strong> the cultivars produce methyl<br />
eugenol up to 8% in the vegetative stage. Linalool as main compound is increasing from the vegetative<br />
(10–50%) to the flowering (20–60%), <strong>and</strong> postflowering phase (25–80%), whereas the second<br />
important substance eugenol reaches its peak at the beginning <strong>of</strong> flowering (5–35%). According to the<br />
cultivars, different harvest dates are therefore recommended. In O. sanctum, the content <strong>of</strong> eugenol<br />
(60.3–52.2%) as well as <strong>of</strong> methyl eugenol (6.6–2.0%) is decreasing from young to senescent leaves<br />
<strong>and</strong> at the same time b-caryophyllene increases from 20.8% to 30.2% (Dey <strong>and</strong> Choudhuri, 1983).<br />
As regards oregano (O. vulgare ssp. hirtum), the early season preponderance <strong>of</strong> p-cymene over<br />
carvacrol was reversed as the season progressed <strong>and</strong> this pattern could also be observed at any time<br />
within the plant, from the latest leaves produced (low in cymene) to the earliest (high in cymene)<br />
(Johnson et al., 2004; Figure 3.9). Already Kokkini et al. (1996) had shown that oregano contains a<br />
higher proportion <strong>of</strong> p-cymene to carvacrol (or thymol) in spring <strong>and</strong> autumn, whereas carvacrol/<br />
thymol prevails in the summer. This is explained by Dudai et al. (1992) as photoperiodic reaction:<br />
short days with high p-cymene, long days with low p-cymene production. But only young plants are<br />
capable <strong>of</strong> making this switch, whereas in older leaves the already produced <strong>and</strong> stored oil remains<br />
almost unchanged (Johnson et al., 2004).<br />
Presumably the most studied essential oil plant is peppermint (Mentha × piperita L.). Already in<br />
the 1950s Lemli (1955) stated that the proportion <strong>of</strong> menthol to menthone in peppermint leaves changes<br />
in the course <strong>of</strong> the development toward higher menthol contents. Lawrence (2007) has just recently<br />
shown that from immature plants via mature to senescent plants the content <strong>of</strong> menthol increases<br />
(34.8–39.9–48.2%) <strong>and</strong> correspondingly the menthone content decreases dramatically (26.8–17.4–<br />
4.7%). At the same time, also an increase <strong>of</strong> menthyl acetate from 8.5% to 23.3% <strong>of</strong> the oil could be<br />
observed. At full flowering, the peppermint herb oil contains only 36.8% menthol but 21.8% menthone,<br />
7.7% menth<strong>of</strong>uran, <strong>and</strong> almost 3% pulegone due to the fact that the flower oils are richer in<br />
%<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Early March<br />
Late March<br />
Late May<br />
FIGURE 3.9 Average percentages <strong>and</strong> concentrations <strong>of</strong> p-cymene. g-terpinene <strong>and</strong> carvacrol at the different<br />
sampling dates <strong>of</strong> Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum. Solid bars: p-cymene; diagonally hatched bars: g-terpinene;<br />
open bars: carvacrol.
Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 69<br />
menthone <strong>and</strong> pulegone <strong>and</strong> contain a high amount <strong>of</strong> menth<strong>of</strong>uran (Hefendehl, 1962). Corresponding<br />
differences have been found between young leaves rich in menthone <strong>and</strong> old leaves with high menthol<br />
<strong>and</strong> menthyl acetate content (Hoeltzel, 1964; Franz, 1972). The developmental stage depends, however,<br />
to a large extent from the environmental conditions, especially the day length.<br />
3.5.3.4 Environmental Influences<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oil formation in the plants is highly dependent on climatic conditions, especially day<br />
length, irradiance, temperature, <strong>and</strong> water supply. Tropical species follow in their vegetation cycle<br />
the dry <strong>and</strong> rainy season; species <strong>of</strong> the temperate zones react more on day length, the more distant<br />
from the equator their natural distribution area is located.<br />
Peppermint as typical long day plant needs a minimum day length (hours <strong>of</strong> day light) to switch<br />
from the vegetative to the generative phase. This is followed by a change in the essential oil composition<br />
from menthone to menthol <strong>and</strong> menthyl acetate (Hoeltzel, 1964). Franz (1981) tested six peppermint<br />
clones at Munich/Germany <strong>and</strong> at the same time also at Izmir/Turkey. At the development<br />
stage “beginning <strong>of</strong> flowering,” all clones contained at the more northern site much more menthol<br />
than on the Mediterranean location, which was explained by a maximum day length in Munich <strong>of</strong><br />
16 h 45 min, but in Izmir <strong>of</strong> 14 h 50 min only. Comparable day length reactions have been mentioned<br />
already for oregano (Kokkini et al., 1996; Dudai et al., 1992). Also marjoram (O. majorana L.)<br />
was influenced not only in flower formation by day length, but also in oil composition (Circella<br />
et al., 1995). At long day treatment the essential oil contained more cis-sabinene hydrate. Terpinene-<br />
4-ol prevailed under short day conditions.<br />
Franz et al. (1986) performed ecological experiments with chamomile, growing vegetatively<br />
propagated plants at three different sites, in South Finl<strong>and</strong>, Middle Europe, <strong>and</strong> West Turkey. As<br />
regards the oil content, a correlation between flower formation, flowering period, <strong>and</strong> essential oil<br />
synthesis could be observed: the shorter the flowering phase, the less was the time available for oil<br />
formation, <strong>and</strong> thus the lower was the oil content. The composition <strong>of</strong> the essential oil, on the other<br />
h<strong>and</strong>, showed no qualitative change due to ecological or climatic factors confirming that chemotypes<br />
keep their typical pattern. In addition, Massoud <strong>and</strong> Franz (1990) investigated the<br />
genotype–environment interaction <strong>of</strong> a chamazulene–bisabolol chemotype. The frequency distributions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the essential oil content as well as the content on chamazulene <strong>and</strong> a-bisabolol have shown<br />
that the highest oil- <strong>and</strong> bisabolol content was reached in Egypt while under German climatic conditions<br />
chamazulene was higher. Similar results have been obtained by Letchamo <strong>and</strong> Marquard<br />
(1993). The relatively high heritability coefficients calculated for some essential oil components—<br />
informing whether a character is more influenced by genetic or other factors—confirm that the<br />
potential to produce a certain chemical pattern is genetically coded, but the gene expression will be<br />
induced or repressed by environmental factors also (Franz, 1993b,d).<br />
Other environmental factors, for instance soil properties, water stress, or temperature, are<br />
mainly influencing the productivity <strong>of</strong> the respective plant species <strong>and</strong> by this means the oil yield<br />
also, but have little effect on the essential oil formation <strong>and</strong> composition only (Figueiredo et al.,<br />
1997; Salamon, 2007).<br />
3.5.3.5 Cultivation Measures, Contaminations, <strong>and</strong> Harvesting<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oil-bearing plants comprise annual, biennial, or perennial herbs, shrubs, <strong>and</strong> trees, cultivated<br />
either in tropical or subtropical areas, in Mediterranean regions, in temperate, or even in arid<br />
zones. Surveys in this respect are given, for instance, by Chatterjee (2002) for India, by Carruba<br />
et al. (2002) for Mediterranean environments, <strong>and</strong> by Galambosi <strong>and</strong> Dragl<strong>and</strong> (2002) for Nordic<br />
countries. Nevertheless, some examples should refer to some specific items.<br />
The cultivation method—if direct sowing or transplanting—<strong>and</strong> the timing influence the crop<br />
development <strong>and</strong> by that way also the quality <strong>of</strong> the product, as mentioned above. Vegetative propagation,<br />
necessary for peppermint due to its genetic background as interpecific hybrid, common in<br />
Cymbopogon sp. <strong>and</strong> useful to control the ratio between male <strong>and</strong> female trees in nutmeg (Myristica
70 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
fragrans), results in homogeneous plant populations <strong>and</strong> fields. A disadvantage could be the easier<br />
dispersion <strong>of</strong> pests <strong>and</strong> diseases, as known for “yellow rot” <strong>of</strong> lav<strong>and</strong>in (Lav<strong>and</strong>ula × hybrida)<br />
(Fritzsche et al., 2007). Clonal propagation can be performed by leaf or stem cuttings (Goehler<br />
et al., 1997; Nicola et al., 2006; El-Keltawi <strong>and</strong> Abdel-Rahman, 2006) or in vitro (e.g., Figueiredo<br />
et al., 1997; Mendes <strong>and</strong> Romano, 1997), the latter method especially for mother plant propagation<br />
due to the high costs. In vitro essential oil production received increased attention in physiological<br />
experiments, but has up to now no practical significance.<br />
As regards plant nutrition <strong>and</strong> fertilizing, a numerous publications have shown its importance<br />
for plant growth, development, <strong>and</strong> biomass yield. The essential oil yield, obviously, depends on<br />
the plant biomass; the oil percentage is partly influenced by the plant vigor <strong>and</strong> metabolic activity.<br />
Optimal fertilizing <strong>and</strong> water supply results in better growth <strong>and</strong> oil content, for example, in<br />
marjoram, oregano, basil, or cori<strong>and</strong>er (Menary, 1994), but also in delay <strong>of</strong> maturity, which causes<br />
quite <strong>of</strong>ten “immature” flavors.<br />
Franz (1972) investigated the influence <strong>of</strong> nitrogen <strong>and</strong> potassium on the essential oil formation<br />
<strong>of</strong> peppermint. He could show that higher nitrogen supply increased the biomass but retarded the<br />
plant development until flowering, whereas higher potassium supply forced the maturity. With<br />
increasing nitrogen, a higher oil percentage was observed with lower menthol <strong>and</strong> higher menthone<br />
content; potassium supply resulted in less oil with more menthol <strong>and</strong> menthyl acetate. Comparable<br />
results with Rosmarinus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis have been obtained by Martinetti et al. (2006), <strong>and</strong> Omidbaigi<br />
<strong>and</strong> Arjm<strong>and</strong>i (2002) have shown for Thymus vulgaris that nitrogen <strong>and</strong> phosphorus fertilization<br />
had significant effect on the herb yield <strong>and</strong> essential oil content, but did not change the thymol<br />
percentage. Also Java citronella (Cymbopogon winterianus Jowitt.) responded to nitrogen supply<br />
with higher herb <strong>and</strong> oil yields, but no influence on the geraniol content could be found (Munsi <strong>and</strong><br />
Mukherjee, 1986).<br />
Extensive pot experiments with chamomile (Matricaria recutita) have also shown that high<br />
nitrogen <strong>and</strong> phosphorus nutrition levels resulted in a slightly increased essential oil content <strong>of</strong> the<br />
anthodia, but raising the potassium doses had a respective negative effect (Franz et al., 1983). With<br />
nitrogen the flower formation was in delay <strong>and</strong> lasted longer; with more potassium the flowering<br />
phase was reduced, which obviously influenced the period available for essential oil production.<br />
This was confirmed by respective 14 C-acetate labeling experiments (Franz, 1981).<br />
Almost no effect has been observed on the composition <strong>of</strong> the essential oil. Also a number <strong>of</strong><br />
similar pot or field trials came to the same result, as summarized by Salamon (2007).<br />
Salinity <strong>and</strong> salt stress get an increasing importance in agriculture especially in subtropical <strong>and</strong><br />
Mediterranean areas. Some essential oil plants, for example, Artemisia sp. <strong>and</strong> Matricaria recutita<br />
(chamomile) are relatively salt tolerant. Also thyme (Thymus vulgaris) showed a good tolerance to<br />
irrigation water salinity up to 2000 ppm, but exceeding concentrations caused severe damages<br />
(Massoud et al., 2002). Higher salinity reduced also the oil content, <strong>and</strong> an increase <strong>of</strong> p-cymene<br />
was observed. Recently, Aziz et al. (2008) investigated the influence <strong>of</strong> salt stress on growth <strong>and</strong><br />
essential oil in several mint species. In all three mints, salinity reduced the growth severely from<br />
1.5 g/L onward; in peppermint, the menthone content raised <strong>and</strong> menthol went down to
Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 71<br />
plant material. More important in the production <strong>of</strong> essential oils are pests <strong>and</strong> diseases that cause<br />
damages to the plant material <strong>and</strong> sometimes alterations in the biosynthesis; but little is known in<br />
this respect.<br />
In contrast to organic production, where no use <strong>of</strong> pesticides is permitted, a small number <strong>of</strong><br />
insecticides, fungicides, <strong>and</strong> herbicides are approved for conventional herb production. The number,<br />
however, is very restricted (end <strong>of</strong> 2008 several active substances lost registration at least in Europe),<br />
<strong>and</strong> limits for residues can be found in national law <strong>and</strong> international regulations, for example, the<br />
European Pharmacopoeia. For essential oils, mainly the lipophilic substances are <strong>of</strong> relevance since<br />
they can be enriched over the limits in the oil.<br />
Harvesting <strong>and</strong> the first steps <strong>of</strong> postharvest h<strong>and</strong>ling are the last part <strong>of</strong> the production chain<br />
<strong>of</strong> starting materials for essential oils. The harvest date is determined by the development stage<br />
or maturity <strong>of</strong> the plant or plant part, Harvesting techniques should keep the quality by avoiding<br />
adulterations, admixtures with undesired plant parts, or contaminations, which could cause<br />
“<strong>of</strong>f-flavor” in the final product. There are many technical aids at disposal, from simple devices<br />
to large-scale harvesters, which will be considered carefully in Chapter 4. From the quality point<br />
<strong>of</strong> view, raising the temperature by fermentation should in general be avoided (except, in vanilla),<br />
<strong>and</strong> during the drying process further contamination with soil, dust, insects, or molds has to<br />
be avoided.<br />
Quality <strong>and</strong> safety <strong>of</strong> essential oil-bearing plants as raw materials for pharmaceutical products,<br />
flavors, <strong>and</strong> fragrances are <strong>of</strong> highest priority from the consumer point <strong>of</strong> view. To meet the respective<br />
dem<strong>and</strong>s, st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> safety as well as quality assurance measures are needed to ensure that<br />
the plants are produced with care, so that negative impacts during wild collection, cultivation,<br />
processing, <strong>and</strong> storage can be limited. To overcome these problems <strong>and</strong> to guarantee a steady,<br />
affordable <strong>and</strong> sustainable supply <strong>of</strong> essential oil plants <strong>of</strong> good quality (Figure 3.10), in recent<br />
years guidelines for good agricultural practices (GAP) <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards for Sustainable Wild<br />
Collection (ISSC) have been established at the national <strong>and</strong> international level.<br />
Cultivation<br />
Growing site, crop rotation,<br />
production technique<br />
<strong>and</strong> maintenance,<br />
fertilization, plant protection,<br />
spec. methods (e.g. organic<br />
production), harvest time <strong>and</strong><br />
technique<br />
Starting material<br />
Species,<br />
variety, cultivar<br />
chemotype,<br />
resistances<br />
spec. characters<br />
(e.g. “usability value”)<br />
Stepwise<br />
quality<br />
control<br />
Safety<br />
Prevention<br />
against intoxications<br />
Storage<br />
Storehouse conditions,<br />
packaging<br />
Post harvest h<strong>and</strong>ling<br />
Transport from field,<br />
washing, drying,<br />
processing<br />
FIGURE 3.10 Main items <strong>of</strong> “good agricultural practices (GAP)” for medicinal <strong>and</strong> aromatic plants.
72 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
3.6 INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS FOR WILD COLLECTION<br />
AND CULTIVATION<br />
3.6.1 GA(C)P: GUIDELINES FOR GOOD AGRICULTURAL (AND COLLECTION) PRACTICE<br />
OF MEDICINAL AND AROMATIC PLANTS<br />
First initiatives for the elaboration <strong>of</strong> such guidelines trace back to a roundtable discussion in Angers,<br />
France in 1983, <strong>and</strong> intensified at an International Symposium in Novi Sad 1988 (Franz, 1989b).<br />
A first comprehensive paper was published by Pank et al. (1991) <strong>and</strong> in 1998 the European Herb<br />
Growers Association (EHGA/EUROPAM) released the first version (Máthé <strong>and</strong> Franz, 1999). The<br />
actual version can be downloaded from http://www.europam.net.<br />
In the following it was adopted <strong>and</strong> slightly modified by the European Agency for the Evaluation<br />
<strong>of</strong> Medicinal Products (EMEA), <strong>and</strong> finally as Guidelines on good agricultural <strong>and</strong> collection practices<br />
(GACP) by the WHO in 2003.<br />
All these guidelines follow almost the same concept dealing with the following topics:<br />
• Identification <strong>and</strong> authentication <strong>of</strong> the plant material, especially botanical identity <strong>and</strong><br />
deposition <strong>of</strong> specimens.<br />
• Seeds <strong>and</strong> other propagation material, respecting the specific st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> certifications.<br />
• Cultivation, including site selection, climate, soil, fertilization, irrigation, crop maintenance,<br />
<strong>and</strong> plant protection with special regard to contaminations <strong>and</strong> residues.<br />
• Harvest, with specific attention to harvest time <strong>and</strong> conditions, equipment, damage, contaminations<br />
with (toxic) weeds <strong>and</strong> soil, transport, possible contact with any animals, <strong>and</strong><br />
cleaning <strong>of</strong> all equipment <strong>and</strong> containers.<br />
• Primary processing, that is, washing, drying, distilling; cleanness <strong>of</strong> the buildings; according<br />
to the actual legal situation these processing steps including distillation—if performed<br />
by the farmer—is still part <strong>of</strong> GA(C)P; in all other cases, it is subjected to GMP (good<br />
manufacturing practice).<br />
• Packaging <strong>and</strong> labeling, including suitability <strong>of</strong> the material.<br />
• Storage <strong>and</strong> transportation, especially storage conditions, protection against pests <strong>and</strong><br />
animals, fumigation, <strong>and</strong> transport facilities.<br />
• Equipment: material, design, construction, easy to clean.<br />
• Personnel <strong>and</strong> facilities, with special regard to education, hygiene, protection against<br />
allergens <strong>and</strong> other toxic compounds, welfare.<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> wild collection the st<strong>and</strong>ard for sustainable collection should be applied (see<br />
Section 3.6.2).<br />
A very important topic is finally the documentation <strong>of</strong> all steps <strong>and</strong> measurements to be able to<br />
trace back the starting material, the exact location <strong>of</strong> the field, any treatment with agrochemicals,<br />
<strong>and</strong> the special circumstances during the cultivation period. Quality assurance is only possible if the<br />
traceability is given <strong>and</strong> the personnel is educated appropriately. Certification <strong>and</strong> auditing <strong>of</strong> the<br />
production <strong>of</strong> essential oil-bearing plants is not yet obligatory, but recommended <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten requested<br />
by the customer.<br />
3.6.2 ISSC-MAP: THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON SUSTAINABLE WILD COLLECTION<br />
OF MEDICINAL AND AROMATIC PLANTS<br />
ISSC-MAP is a joint initiative <strong>of</strong> the German Bundesamt für Naturschutz (BfN), WWF/TRAFFIC<br />
Germany, IUCN Canada, <strong>and</strong> IUCN Medicinal Plant Specialist Group (MPSG). ISSC-MAP intends<br />
to ensure the long-term survival <strong>of</strong> MAP populations in their habitats by setting principles <strong>and</strong> criteria<br />
for the management <strong>of</strong> MAP wild collection (Leaman, 2006; Medicinal Plant Specialist Group,
Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 73<br />
2007). The st<strong>and</strong>ard is not intended to address product storage, transport, <strong>and</strong> processing, or any<br />
issues <strong>of</strong> products, topics covered by the WHO Guidelines on GACP for Medicinal Plants (WHO,<br />
2003). ISSC-MAP includes legal <strong>and</strong> ethical requirements (legitimacy, customary rights, <strong>and</strong> transparency),<br />
resource assessment, management planning <strong>and</strong> monitoring, responsible collection, <strong>and</strong><br />
collection, area practices <strong>and</strong> responsible business practices. One <strong>of</strong> the strengths <strong>of</strong> this st<strong>and</strong>ard is<br />
that resource management not only includes target MAP resources <strong>and</strong> their habitats but also social,<br />
cultural, <strong>and</strong> economic issues.<br />
3.6.3 FAIRWILD<br />
The FairWild st<strong>and</strong>ard (http://www.fairwild.org) was initiated by the Swiss Import Promotion<br />
Organization (SIPPO) <strong>and</strong> combines principles <strong>of</strong> FairTrade (Fairtrade Labelling Organizations<br />
International, FLO), international labor st<strong>and</strong>ards (International Labour Organization, ILO), <strong>and</strong><br />
sustainability (ISSC-MAP).<br />
3.7 CONCLUSION<br />
This chapter has shown that a number <strong>of</strong> items concerning the plant raw material have to be taken<br />
into consideration when producing essential oils. A quality management has to be established tracing<br />
back to the authenticity <strong>of</strong> the starting material <strong>and</strong> ensuring that all known influences on the<br />
quality are taken into account <strong>and</strong> documented in an appropriate way. This is necessary to meet the<br />
increasing requirements <strong>of</strong> international st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> regulations. The review also shows that a<br />
high number <strong>of</strong> data <strong>and</strong> information exist, but sometimes without expected relevance due to the fact<br />
that the repeatability <strong>of</strong> the results is not given by a weak experimental design, an incorrect description<br />
<strong>of</strong> the plant material used, or an inappropriate sampling. On the other side, this opens the chance<br />
for many more research work in the field <strong>of</strong> essential oil-bearing plants.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Agnaniet, H., C. Menut, <strong>and</strong> J.M. Bessière, 2004. Aromatic plants <strong>of</strong> tropical Africa XLIX: Chemical composition<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>of</strong> the leaf <strong>and</strong> rhizome <strong>of</strong> Aframomum giganteum K. Schum from Gabun. Flavour<br />
Fragr. J., 19: 205–209.<br />
Akhila, A. <strong>and</strong> M. Rani, 2002. Chemical constituents <strong>and</strong> essential oil biogenesis in Vetiveria zizanioides. In<br />
Vetiveria—The genus Vetiveria, M. Maffei (ed.), pp. 73–109. New York: Taylor & Francis.<br />
Aiello, N., F. Scartezzini, C. Vender, L. D’Andrea, <strong>and</strong> A. Albasini, 2001. Caratterisiche morfologiche, produttive<br />
e qualitative di una nuova varietà sintetica di salvia confrontata con altre cultivar. ISAFA Comunicaz.<br />
Ric., 2001/1: 5–16.<br />
Asllani, U., 2000. Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> albanian sage oil (Salvia <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L.). J. Essent. Oil Res.,<br />
12: 79–84.<br />
Auer, C.A., 2003. Tracking genes from seed to supermarket: Techniques <strong>and</strong> trends. Trends Plant Sci.,<br />
8: 591–597.<br />
Aziz, E.E., H. Al-Amier, <strong>and</strong> L.E. Craker, 2008. Influence <strong>of</strong> salt stress on growth <strong>and</strong> essential oil production<br />
in peppermint, pennyroyal <strong>and</strong> apple mint. J. Herbs, Spices Med. Plants, 14: 77–87.<br />
Baser, K.H.C., 2002. The Turkish Origanum species. In Oregano. The Genera Origanum <strong>and</strong> Lippia,<br />
S.E. Kintzios (ed.), pp. 109–126. New York: Taylor & Francis.<br />
Bazina, E., A. Makris, C. Vender, <strong>and</strong> M. Skoula, 2002. Genetic <strong>and</strong> chemical relations among selected clones<br />
<strong>of</strong> Salvia <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis. In Breeding Research on Aromatic <strong>and</strong> Medicinal Plants, C.B. Johnson <strong>and</strong> Ch. Franz<br />
(eds), pp. 269–273, Binghampton: Haworth Press.<br />
Bergougnoux, V., J.C. Caissard, F. Jullien, J.L. Magnard, G. Scalliet, J.M. Cock, P. Hugueney, <strong>and</strong> S. Baudino,<br />
2007. Both the adaxial <strong>and</strong> abaxial epidermal layers <strong>of</strong> the rose petal emit volatile scent compounds.<br />
Planta, 226: 853–866.<br />
Bernáth, J., 2000. Genetic improvement <strong>of</strong> cultivated species <strong>of</strong> the genus Salvia. In Sage—The Genus Salvia,<br />
S.E. Kintzios (ed.), pp. 109–124, Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
74 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Bernáth, J., 2002. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> strategies <strong>and</strong> results concerning genetical improvement <strong>of</strong> medicinal <strong>and</strong><br />
aromatic plants. Acta Hort., 576: 116–128.<br />
Bertea, C.M. <strong>and</strong> W. Camusso, 2002. Anatomy, biochemistry <strong>and</strong> physiology. In Vetiveria. Medicinal <strong>and</strong><br />
Aromatic Plants—Industrial Pr<strong>of</strong>i les, Vol. 20, M. Maffei (ed.), pp. 19–43. London: Taylor & Francis.<br />
Bezzi, A., 1994. Selezione clonale e costituzione di varietà di salvia (Salvia <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L.). Atti convegno internazionale<br />
‘Coltivazione e miglioramento di piante <strong>of</strong>fi cinali’, 97–117.<br />
Bicchi, C., M. Fresia, P. Rubiolo, D. Monti, Ch. Franz, <strong>and</strong> I. Goehler, 1997. Constituents <strong>of</strong> Tagetes lucida<br />
Cav. ssp. lucida essential oil. Flavour Fragr. J., 12: 47–52.<br />
Bradbury, L.M.T., R.J. Henry, Q. Jin, R.F. Reinke, <strong>and</strong> D.L.E. Waters, 2005. A perfect marker for fragrance<br />
genotyping in rice. Mol. Breed., 16: 279–283.<br />
Bradu, B.L., S.N. Sobti, P. Pushpangadan, K.M. Khosla, B.L. Rao, <strong>and</strong> S.C. Gupta, 1989. Development <strong>of</strong><br />
superior alternate source <strong>of</strong> clove oil from ‘Clocimum’ (Ocimum gratissimum Linn.). Proc. 11th Int.<br />
Congr. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, Fragrances <strong>and</strong> Flavours, Vol. 3, pp. 97–103.<br />
Brophy, J.J. <strong>and</strong> I.A. Southwell, 2002. Eucalyptus chemistry. In Eucalyptus—The Genus Eucalyptus,<br />
J.J.W. Coppen (ed.), pp. 102–160. London: Taylor & Francis.<br />
Carruba, A., R. la Torre, <strong>and</strong> A. Matranga, 2002. Cultivation trials <strong>of</strong> some aromatic <strong>and</strong> medicinal plants in a<br />
semiarid Mediterranean environment. Acta Hort., 576: 207–214.<br />
CBD, 2001. Convention on biological diversity. United Nations Environment Programme, CBD Meeting<br />
Nairobi.<br />
CBD, 2002. Global strategy for plant conservation. CBD Meeting The Hague.<br />
CBD, 2004. Sustainable use <strong>of</strong> biodiversity. CBD Meeting Montreal.<br />
Ceylan, A., H. Otan, A.O. Sari, N. Carkaci, E. Bayram, N. Ozay, M. Polat, A. Kitiki, <strong>and</strong> B. Oguz, 1994.<br />
Origanum onites L. (Izmir Kekigi) Uzerinde Agroteknik Arastirmalar, Final Report.<br />
Chalchat, J., J.C. Gary, <strong>and</strong> R.P. Muhayimana, 1995. <strong>Essential</strong> oil <strong>of</strong> Tagetes minuta from Rw<strong>and</strong>a <strong>and</strong> France:<br />
Chemical composition according to harvesting, location, growing stage <strong>and</strong> plant part. J. Essent. Oil Res.,<br />
7: 375–386.<br />
Chalchat, J., A. Michet, <strong>and</strong> B. Pasquier, 1998. Study <strong>of</strong> clones <strong>of</strong> Salvia <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L., yields <strong>and</strong> chemical<br />
composition <strong>of</strong> essential oil. Flavour Fragr. J., 13: 68–70.<br />
Chatterjee, S.K., 2002. Cultivation <strong>of</strong> medicinal <strong>and</strong> aromatic plants in India. Acta Hort., 576: 191–202.<br />
Ciccio, J.F., 2004. A source <strong>of</strong> almost pure methylchavicol: Volatile oil from the aerial parts <strong>of</strong> Tagetes lucida<br />
(Asteraceae) cultivated in Costa Rica. Revista de Biologia Tropical, 52: 853–857.<br />
Circella, G., Ch. Franz, J. Novak, <strong>and</strong> H. Resch, 1995. Influence <strong>of</strong> day length <strong>and</strong> leaf insertion on the composition<br />
<strong>of</strong> marjoram essential oil. Flavour Fragr. J., 10: 371–374.<br />
Coronel, A.C., C.M. Cerda-Garcia-Rojas, P. Joseph-Nathan, <strong>and</strong> C.A.N. Catalán, 2006. Chemical composition,<br />
seasonal variation <strong>and</strong> a new sesquiterpene alcohol from the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Lippia integrifolia. Flavour<br />
Fragr. J., 21: 839–847.<br />
Croteau, R., M. Felton, F. Karp, <strong>and</strong> R. Kjonaas, 1981. Relationship <strong>of</strong> camphor biosynthesis to leaf development<br />
in sage (Salvia <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis). Plant Physiol., 67: 820–824.<br />
Croteau, R., 1991. Metabolism <strong>of</strong> monoterpenes in mint (Mentha) species. Planta Medica, 57 (Suppl. 1):<br />
10–14.<br />
Czabajska, W., J. Dabrowska, K. Kazmierczak, <strong>and</strong> E. Ludowicz, 1978. Maintenance breeding <strong>of</strong> chamomile<br />
cultivar ‘Zloty Lan’. Herba Polon., 24: 57–64.<br />
Daniel, G. <strong>and</strong> U. Bomme, 1991. Use <strong>of</strong> in-vitro culture for arnica (Arnica montana L.) breeding. L<strong>and</strong>w.<br />
Jahrb., 68: 249–253.<br />
Dellacassa, E., E. Soler, P. Menéndez, <strong>and</strong> P. Moyna, 1990. Essentail oils from Lippia alba Mill. N.E. Brown<br />
<strong>and</strong> Aloysia chamaedrifolia Cham. (Verbenaceae) from Urugay. Flavour Fragr. J., 5: 107–108.<br />
Desmarest, P., 1992. Amelioration du fenonil amier par selection recurrente, clonage et embryogenèse somatique.<br />
Proc. 2nd Mediplant Conf., Conthey/CH, P. pp. 19–26.<br />
Dey, B.B. <strong>and</strong> M.A. Choudhuri, 1983. Effect <strong>of</strong> leaf development stage on changes in essential oil <strong>of</strong> Ocimum<br />
sanctum L. Biochem. Physiol. Pfl anzen, 178: 331–335.<br />
Diemer, F., F. Jullien, O. Faure, S. Moja, M. Colson, E. Matthys-Rochon, <strong>and</strong> J.C. Caissard, 1998. High efficiency<br />
transformation <strong>of</strong> peppermint (Mentha x piperita L.) with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Sci.,<br />
136: 101–108.<br />
Dominguez, X.A., S.H. Sánchez, M. Suárez, X Baldas, J.H., <strong>and</strong> G. Ma del Rosario, 1989. Chemical constituents<br />
<strong>of</strong> Lippia graveolens. Planta Med., 55: 208–209.<br />
Doran, J.C., 2002. Genetic improvement <strong>of</strong> eucalyptus. In Eucalyptus—the Genus Eucalyptus, J.J.W.<br />
Coppen (ed.), pp. 75–101. Medicinal <strong>and</strong> Aromatic Plants—Industrial Pr<strong>of</strong>i les, Vol. 22. London:<br />
Taylor & Francis.
Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 75<br />
Dronne, S., S. Moja, F. Jullien, F. Berger, <strong>and</strong> J.C. Caissard, 1999. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation <strong>of</strong><br />
lav<strong>and</strong>in (Lav<strong>and</strong>ula × intermedia Emeric ex Loiseleur). Transgenic Res., 8: 335–347.<br />
Dudai, N., E. Putievsky, U. Ravid, D. Palevitch, <strong>and</strong> A.H. Halevy, 1992. Monoterpene content <strong>of</strong> Origanum<br />
syriacum L. as affected by environmental conditions <strong>and</strong> flowering. Physiol. Plant., 84: 453–459.<br />
Dudai, N., 2006. Breeding <strong>of</strong> high quality basil for the fresh herb market—an overview. Int. Symp. The Labiatae.<br />
San Remo, p. 15, 2006.<br />
Elementi, S., R. Nevi, <strong>and</strong> L.F. D’Antuono, 2006. Biodiversity <strong>and</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> ‘European’ basil (Ocimum<br />
basilicum L.) types. Acta Hort., 723: 99–104.<br />
El-Keltawi, N.E.M., S.S.A. Abdel-Rahman, 2006. In vivo propagation <strong>of</strong> certain sweet basil cultivars. Acta<br />
Hort., 723: 297–302.<br />
Fahn, A., 1979. Secretory Tissues in Plants. London: Academic Press.<br />
Fahn, A., 1988. Secretory tissues in vascular plants. New Phytologist, 108: 229–257.<br />
Figueiredo, A.C., J.G. Barroso, L.G. Pedro, <strong>and</strong> J.J.C. Scheffer, 1997. Physiological aspects <strong>of</strong> essential oil<br />
production. In <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>: Basic <strong>and</strong> Applied Research, Ch. Franz, A. Máthé, <strong>and</strong> G. Buchbauer (eds),<br />
pp. 95–107. Carol Stream: Allured Publishing.<br />
Fischer, U., 1998. Variabilität Guatemaltekischer Arzneipflanzen der Gattung Lippia (Verbenaceae): Lippia<br />
alba, L. dulcis, L. graveolens. Dissertation, Veterinärmedizinischen Universität, Wien.<br />
Fischer, U., Ch. Franz, R. Lopez, E. Pöll, 1996. Variability <strong>of</strong> the essential oils <strong>of</strong> Lippia graveolens HBK from<br />
Guatemala. In <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>: Basic <strong>and</strong> Applied Research, Ch. Franz, A. Máthé, <strong>and</strong> A. G. Buchbauer<br />
(eds), pp. 266–269. Carol Stream: Allured Publishing.<br />
Fischer, U., R. Lopez, E. Pöll, S. Vetter, J. Novak, <strong>and</strong> Ch. Franz, 2004. Two chemotypes within Lippia alba<br />
populations in Guatemala. Flavour Fragr. J., 19: 333–335.<br />
Franz, C. <strong>and</strong> H. Glasl, 1976. Comparative investigations <strong>of</strong> fruit-, leaf- <strong>and</strong> root-oil <strong>of</strong> some parsley varieties.<br />
Qual. Plant. – Pl. Fds. Hum. Nutr., 25 (3/4): 253–262.<br />
Franz, Ch., 1972. Einfluss der Naehrst<strong>of</strong>fe Stickst<strong>of</strong>f und Kalium auf die Bildung des aetherischen Oels der<br />
Pfefferminze, Mentha piperita L. Planta Med., 22: 160–183.<br />
Franz, Ch., 1981. Zur Qualitaet von Arznei- u. Gewuerzpflanzen. Habil.-Schrift TU, Muenchen.<br />
Franz, Ch., 1982. Genetische, ontogenetische und umweltbedingte Variabilität der Best<strong>and</strong>teile des ätherischen<br />
Öls von Kamille (Matricaria recutita(L.) Rauschert). In Aetherische Oele—Analytik, Physiologie,<br />
Zusammensetzung, K.H. Kubeczka (ed.), pp. 214–224. Stuttgart: Thieme.<br />
Franz, Ch., 1989a. Biochemical genetics <strong>of</strong> essential oil compounds. Proc. 11th Int. Congr. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>,<br />
Fragrances <strong>and</strong> Flavours, Vol. 3, pp. 17–25. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing.<br />
Franz, Ch., 1989b. Good agricultural practice (GAP) for medicinal <strong>and</strong> aromatic plant production. Acta Hort.,<br />
249: 125–128.<br />
Franz, Ch., 1993a. Probleme bei der Beschaffung pflanzlicher Ausgangsmaterialien. In Ätherische Öle,<br />
Anspruch und Wirklichkeit, R. Carle (ed.), pp. 33–58. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft.<br />
Franz, Ch., 1993b. Genetics, In Volatile Oil Crops, R.K.M. Hay <strong>and</strong> P.G. Waterman (eds), pp. 63–96. Harlow:<br />
Longman.<br />
Franz, Ch., 1993c. Domestication <strong>of</strong> wild growing medicinal plants. Plant Res. Dev., 37: 101–111.<br />
Franz, Ch., 1993d. Genetic versus climatic factors influencing essential oil formation. Proc. 12th Int. Congr. <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, Fragrances <strong>and</strong> Flavours, Vienna, pp. 27–44.<br />
Franz, Ch., 1999. Gewinnung von biogenen Arzneist<strong>of</strong>fen und Drogen, In Biogene Arzneist<strong>of</strong>fe H. Rimpler<br />
(ed.), 2nd ed., pp. 1–24. Stuttgart: Deutscher Apotheker Verlag.<br />
Franz, Ch., 2000. Biodiversity <strong>and</strong> r<strong>and</strong>om sampling in essential oil plants. Lecture 31st ISEO, Hamburg.<br />
Franz, Ch., 2001. Plant variety rights <strong>and</strong> specialised plants. Proc. PIPWEG 2001, Conf. on Plant Intellectual<br />
Property within Europe <strong>and</strong> the Wider Global Community, pp. 131–137. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic<br />
Press.<br />
Franz, Ch., J. Hoelzl, <strong>and</strong> A. Voemel, 1978. Variation in the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Matricaria chamomilla L. depending<br />
on plant age <strong>and</strong> stage <strong>of</strong> development. Acta Hort., 73: 230–238.<br />
Franz, Ch., J. Hoelzl, <strong>and</strong> C. Kirsch, 1983. Influence <strong>of</strong> nitrogen, phosphorus <strong>and</strong> potassium fertilization on<br />
chamomile (Chamomilla recutita (L.) Rauschert). II. Effect on the essential oil. Gartenbauwiss./Hort.<br />
Sci., 48: 17–22.<br />
Franz, Ch., C. Kirsch, <strong>and</strong> O. Isaac, 1983. Process for producing a new tetraploid chamomile variety. German<br />
Patent DE3423207.<br />
Franz, Ch., C. Kirsch, O. Isaac, 1985. Neuere Ergebnisse der Kamillenzüchtung. Dtsch. Apoth. Ztg.,<br />
125: 20–23.<br />
Franz, Ch., K. Hardh, S. Haelvae, E. Mueller H. Pelzmann, <strong>and</strong> A. Ceylan, 1986. Influence <strong>of</strong> ecological factors<br />
on yield <strong>and</strong> essential oil <strong>of</strong> chamomile (Matricaria recutita L.) Acta Hort., 188: 157–162.
76 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Franz, Ch. <strong>and</strong> Novak, J., 1997. Breeding <strong>of</strong> Origanum sp., In Proc. IPGRI Workshop Padulosi S (ed.), Oregano,<br />
pp. 50–57.<br />
Frezal, L. <strong>and</strong> R. Leblois, 2008. Four years <strong>of</strong> DNA barcoding: Current advances <strong>and</strong> prospects. Infect. Genet.<br />
Evol., 8: 727–736.<br />
Frighetto, N., J.G. de Oliveira, A.C. Siani, <strong>and</strong> K. Calago das Chagas, 1998. Lippia alba Mill (Verbenaceae) as<br />
a source <strong>of</strong> linalool. J. Essent. Oil Res., 10: 578–580.<br />
Fritzsche, R., J. Gabler, H. Kleinhempel, K. Naumann, A. Plescher, G. Proeseler, F. Rabenstein, E. Schliephake,<br />
<strong>and</strong> W. Wradzidlo, 2007. H<strong>and</strong>buch des Arznei- und Gewürzpfl anzenbaus Vol. 3: Krankheiten und<br />
Schädigungen an Arznei- und Gewürzpfl anzen. Bernburg: Saluplanta e.V.<br />
Gabler, J., 2002. Breeding for resistance to biotic <strong>and</strong> abiotic factors in medicinal <strong>and</strong> aromatic plants. In<br />
Breeding Research on Aromatic <strong>and</strong> Medicinal Plants, C.B. Johnson <strong>and</strong> Ch. Franz (eds), pp. 1–12.<br />
Binghampton: Haworth Press.<br />
Galambosi, B. <strong>and</strong> S. Dragl<strong>and</strong>, 2002. Possibilities <strong>and</strong> limitations for herb production in Nordic countries.<br />
Acta Hort., 576: 215–225.<br />
Gancel, A.L., D. Ollé, P. Ollitraut, F. Luro, <strong>and</strong> J.M. Brillouet, 2002. Leaf <strong>and</strong> peel volatile compounds <strong>of</strong> an<br />
interspecific citrus somatic hybrid (Citrus aurantifolia Swing. x Citrus paradisi Macfayden). Flavour<br />
Fragr. J., 17: 416–424.<br />
Gershenzon, J., M.E. McConkey, R.B. Croteau, 2000. Regulation <strong>of</strong> monoterpene accumulation in leaves <strong>of</strong><br />
peppermint. Plant Physiol., 122: 205–213.<br />
Giannouli, A.L. <strong>and</strong> S.E. Kintzios, 2000. <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> <strong>of</strong> Salvia spp.: Examples <strong>of</strong> intraspecific <strong>and</strong> seasonal<br />
variation. In Sage—The Genus Salvia, S.E. Kintzios (ed.), pp. 69–80, Amsterdam: Harwood Academic<br />
Publishing.<br />
Goehler, I., Ch. Franz, A. Orellana, <strong>and</strong> C. Rosales, 1997. Propagation <strong>of</strong> Tagetes lucida Cav. Poster WOCMAP<br />
II Mendoza/Argentina.<br />
Goehler, I., 2006. Domestikation von Medizinalpflanzen und Untersuchungen zur Inkulturnahme von Tagetes<br />
lucida Cav. Dissertation an der Universität für Bodenkultur Wien.<br />
Gonzales de, C.N., A. Quintero, <strong>and</strong> A. Usubillaga, 2002. Chemotaxonomic value <strong>of</strong> essential oil compounds<br />
in Citrus species. Acta Hort., 576: 49–55.<br />
Gora, J., A. Lis, J. Kula, M. Staniszewska, <strong>and</strong> A. Woloszyn, 2002. Chemical composition variability <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oils in the ontogenesis <strong>of</strong> some plants. Flavour Fragr. J., 17: 445–451.<br />
Gouyon, P.H. <strong>and</strong> P. Vernet, 1982. The consequences <strong>of</strong> gynodioecy in natural populations <strong>of</strong> Thymus vulgaris<br />
L. Theoret. Appl. Genet., 61: 315–320.<br />
Grassi, P. 2003. Botanical <strong>and</strong> chemical investigations in Hyptis spp. (Lamiaceae) in El Salvador. Dissertation,<br />
Universität Wien.<br />
Grassi, P., J. Novak, H. Steinlesberger, <strong>and</strong> Ch. Franz, 2004. A direct liquid, non-equilibrium solid-phase microextraction<br />
application for analysing chemical variation <strong>of</strong> single peltate trichomes on leaves <strong>of</strong> Salvia<br />
<strong>of</strong>fi cinalis. Phytochem. Anal., 15: 198–203.<br />
Harrewijn, P., van A.M. Oosten, <strong>and</strong> P.G.M. Piron, 2001. Natural Terpenoids as Messengers. Dordrecht: Kluwer<br />
Academic Publishers.<br />
Hay, R.K.M. <strong>and</strong> P.G. Waterman, 1993. Volatile Oil Crops. Burnt Mill: Longman <strong>Science</strong> & <strong>Technology</strong><br />
Publications.<br />
Hebert, P.D.N., A. Cywinska, S.L. Ball, <strong>and</strong> J.R. deWaard, 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes.<br />
Proc R Soc Lond B, 270: 313–322.<br />
Hedge, I.C., 1992. A global survey <strong>of</strong> the biography <strong>of</strong> the Labiatae. In Advances in Labiatae <strong>Science</strong>,<br />
R.M. Harley <strong>and</strong> T. Reynolds (eds), pp. 7–17. Kew: Royal Botanical Gardens.<br />
Hefendehl, F.W. 1962. Zusammensetzung des ätherischen Öls von Mentha x piperita im Verlauf der Ontogenese<br />
und Versuche zur Beeinflussung der Ölkomposition. Planta med., 10: 241–266.<br />
Hoeltzel, C. 1964. Über Zusammenhänge zwischen der Biosynthese der ätherischen Öle und dem photoperiodischen<br />
Verhalten der Pfefferminze (Mentha piperita L.). Dissertation Univ. Tübingen/D.<br />
Horn, W., Ch. Franz, <strong>and</strong> I. Wickel, 1988. Zur Genetik der Bisaboloide bei der Kamille. Plant Breed.,<br />
101: 307–312.<br />
Johnson, C.B, A. Kazantzis, M. Skoula, U. Mitteregger, <strong>and</strong> J. Novak, 2004. Seasonal, populational <strong>and</strong> ontogenic<br />
variation in the volatile oil content <strong>and</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> individuals <strong>of</strong> Origanum vulgare subsp. hirtum, assessed<br />
by GC headspace analysis <strong>and</strong> by SPME sampling <strong>of</strong> individual oil gl<strong>and</strong>s. Phytochem. Anal., 15: 286–292.<br />
Kampranis, S.C., D. Ioannidis, A. Purvis, W. Mahrez, E. Ninga, N.A. Katerelos, S. Anssour, J.M. Dunwell,<br />
J. Degenhardt, A.M. Makris, P.W. Goodenough, C.B. Johnson, 2007. Rational conversion <strong>of</strong> substrate<br />
<strong>and</strong> product specificity in a Salvia monoterpene synthase: Structural insights into the evolution <strong>of</strong> terpene<br />
synthase function. The Plant Cell, 19: 1994–2005.
Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 77<br />
Kanias, G.D., C. Souleles, A. Loukis, E. Philotheou-Panou, 1998. Statistical studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> oil composition<br />
in three cultivated Sage species. J. Essent. Oil Res., 10: 395–403.<br />
Karousou, R., D. Vokou, <strong>and</strong> Kokkini, 1998. Variation <strong>of</strong> Salvia fruticosa essential oils on the isl<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> Crete<br />
(Greece). Bot. Acta, 111: 250–254.<br />
Kastner, U., J. Saukel, K. Zitterl-Eglseer, R. Länger, G. Reznicek, J. Jurenitsch, <strong>and</strong> W. Kubelka, 1992.<br />
Ätherisches Öl – ein zusätzliches Merkmal für die Charakterisierung der mitteleuropäischen Taxa der<br />
Achillea-millefolium-Gruppe. Sci. Pharm., 60: 87–99.<br />
Khosla, M.K., B.L. Bradu, <strong>and</strong> R.K. Thapa, 1989. Biogenetic studies on the inheritance <strong>of</strong> different essential<br />
oil constituents <strong>of</strong> Ocimum species, their F1 hybrids <strong>and</strong> synthesized allopolyploids. Herba Hungarica,<br />
28: 13–19.<br />
Kitiki, A., 1996. Status <strong>of</strong> cultivation <strong>and</strong> use <strong>of</strong> oregano in Turkey. In Proc. IPGRI Workshop Oregano, Padulosi<br />
S (ed.), pp. 122–132.<br />
Koezuka, Y., G. Honda, <strong>and</strong> M. Tabata 1986. Genetic control <strong>of</strong> phenylpropanoids in Perilla frutescens.<br />
Phytochemistry, 25: 2085–2087.<br />
Kokkini, S., R. Karousou, A. Dardioti, N. Kirgas, <strong>and</strong> T. Lanaras, 1996. Autumn essential oils <strong>of</strong> Greek oregano<br />
(Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum). Phytochemistry, 44: 883–886.<br />
Kress, W.J., K.J. Wurdack, E.A. Zimmer, L.A. Weigt, <strong>and</strong> D.H. Janzen, 2005. Use <strong>of</strong> DNA barcodes to identify<br />
flowering plants. PNAS, 102: 8369–8374.<br />
Kubeczka, K.H., 1997. In Progress in <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research, K.H.C. Baser <strong>and</strong> N. Kirimer (eds), pp. 35–56,<br />
ISEO, Eskisehir,Turkey.<br />
Kubeczka, K.H., A. Bartsch, <strong>and</strong> I. Ullmann, 1982. Neuere Untersuchungen an ätherischen Apiaceen-Ölen. In<br />
Ätherische Öle—Analytik, Physiologie, Zusammensetzung, K.H. Kubeczka (ed.), pp. 158–187. Stuttgart:<br />
Thieme.<br />
Kubeczka, K.H., I. Bohn, <strong>and</strong> V. Formacek, 1986. New constituents from the essential oils <strong>of</strong> Pimpinella sp. In<br />
Progress in <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Research, E.J. Brunke (ed.), pp. 279–298, Berlin: W de Gruyter.<br />
Kulkarni, R.N., 1990. Honeycomb <strong>and</strong> simple mass selection for herb yield <strong>and</strong> inflorescence-leaf-steam-ratio<br />
in palmarose grass. Euphytica, 47: 147–151.<br />
Kulkarni, R.N. <strong>and</strong> S. Ramesh, 1992. Development <strong>of</strong> lemongrass clones with high oil content through population<br />
improvement. J. Essent. Oil Res., 4: 181–186.<br />
Kurowska, A. <strong>and</strong> I. Galazka, 2006. <strong>Essential</strong> oil composition <strong>of</strong> the parsley seed <strong>of</strong> cultivars marketed in<br />
Pol<strong>and</strong>. Flavour Fragr. J., 21: 143–147.<br />
Langbehn, J., F. Pank, J. Novak <strong>and</strong> C. Franz, 2002. Influence <strong>of</strong> Selection <strong>and</strong> Inbreeding on Origanum<br />
majorana L. J. Herbs, Spices Med. Plants, 9: 21–29.<br />
Lawrence, B.M., 1978. <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 1976–77, pp. 84–109. Wheaton: Allured Publishing.<br />
Lawrence, B.M., 1984. The botanical <strong>and</strong> chemical aspects <strong>of</strong> Oregano. Perf. Flavor, 9 (5): 41–51.<br />
Lawrence, B.M., 2007. Mint. The Genus Mentha. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.<br />
Leaman, D.J., 2006. Sustainable wild collection <strong>of</strong> medicinal <strong>and</strong> aromatic plants. In Medicinal <strong>and</strong> Aromatic<br />
Plants R.J. Bogers, L.E. Craker <strong>and</strong> D. Lange (eds), pp. 97–107, Dordrecht: Springer.<br />
Le Buanec, B., 2001. Development <strong>of</strong> new plant varieties <strong>and</strong> protection <strong>of</strong> intellectual property: An international<br />
perspective. Proc. PIPWEG Conf. 2001 Angers, pp. 103–108. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic<br />
Press.<br />
Lemli, J.A.J.M., 1955. De vluchtige olie van Mentha piperita L. gedurende de ontwikkeling van het plant.<br />
Dissertation, Univ. Groningen.<br />
Letchamo, W. <strong>and</strong> R. Marquard, 1993. The pattern <strong>of</strong> active substances accumulation in camomile genotypes<br />
under different growing conditions <strong>and</strong> harvesting frequencies. Acta Hort., 331: 357–364.<br />
Li, X., Z. Gong, H. Koiwa, X. Niu, J. Espartero, X. Zhu, P. Veronese, B. Ruggiero, R.A. Bressan, S.C. Weller,<br />
<strong>and</strong> P.M. Hasegawa, 2001. Bar-expressing peppermint (Mentha × piperita L. var. Black Mitcham) plants<br />
are highly resistant to the glufosinate herbicide Liberty. Mol. Breed., 8: 109–118.<br />
Lis, A., E. Boczek, <strong>and</strong> J. Gora, 2004. Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the essential oils from fruits. Leaves <strong>and</strong> flowers<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Amur cork tree (Phellodendron amurense Rupr.). Flavour Fragr. J., 19: 549–553.<br />
Lis, A. <strong>and</strong> Milczarek, J., 2006. Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the essential oils from fruits, leaves <strong>and</strong> flowers <strong>of</strong><br />
Phellodendron sachalinene (Fr. Schmidt) Sarg. Flavour Fragr. J., 21: 683–686.<br />
Llewelyn, M. 2002. European plant intellectual property. In Breeding Research on Aromatic <strong>and</strong> Medicinal<br />
Plants, C.B. Johnson <strong>and</strong> Ch. Franz (eds), pp. 389–398. Binghampton: Haworth Press.<br />
Lorenzo, D., D. Paz, P. Davies, R. Vila, S. Canigueral, <strong>and</strong> E. Dellacassa, 2001. Composition <strong>of</strong> a new essential<br />
oil type <strong>of</strong> Lippia alba (Mill.) N.E. Brown from Uruguay. Flavour Fragr. J., 16: 356–359.<br />
Macchia, M., A. Pagano, L. Ceccarini, S. Benvenuti, P.L. Cioni, <strong>and</strong> G. Flamini, 2006. Agronomic <strong>and</strong> phytochimic<br />
characteristics in some genotypes <strong>of</strong> Ocimum basilicum L. Acta Hort., 723: 143–149.
78 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Mahmoud, S.S. <strong>and</strong> R.B. Croteau, 2001. Metabolic engineering <strong>of</strong> essential oil yield <strong>and</strong> composition in mint<br />
by altering expression <strong>of</strong> deoxyxylulose phosphate reductoisomerase <strong>and</strong> menth<strong>of</strong>uran synthase. PNAS,<br />
98: 8915–8920.<br />
Mahmoud, S.S. <strong>and</strong> R.B. Croteau, 2003. Menth<strong>of</strong>uran regulates essential oil biosynthesis in peppermint by<br />
controlling a downstream monoterpene reductase. PNAS, 100: 14481–14486.<br />
Mahmoud, S.S., M. Williams, <strong>and</strong> R.B. Croteau, 2004. Cosuppression <strong>of</strong> limonene-3-hydroxylase in peppermint<br />
promotes accumulation <strong>of</strong> limonene in the essential oil. Phytochemistry, 65: 547–554.<br />
Maleci Bini, L. <strong>and</strong> C. Giuliani, 2006. The gl<strong>and</strong>ular trichomes <strong>of</strong> the Labiatae. A review. Acta Hort.,<br />
723: 85–90.<br />
Marotti, M., R. Piccaglia, <strong>and</strong> E. Giovanelli, 1994. Effects <strong>of</strong> variety <strong>and</strong> ontogenetic stage on the essential oil<br />
composition <strong>and</strong> biological activity <strong>of</strong> fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.). J. Essent. Oil Res., 6: 57–62.<br />
Marotti, M., P. Piccaglia, <strong>and</strong> E. Giovanelli, 1996. Differences in essential oil composition <strong>of</strong> basil (Ocimum<br />
basilicum L.) <strong>of</strong> Italian cultivars related to morphological characteristics. J. Agric. Food Chem.,<br />
44: 3926–3929.<br />
Marotti, M., R. Piccaglia, B. Biavati, <strong>and</strong> I.Marotti, 2004. Characterization <strong>and</strong> yield evaluation <strong>of</strong> essential oils<br />
from different Tagetes species. J. Essent. Oil Res., 16: 440–444.<br />
Marthe, F. <strong>and</strong> P. Scholze 1996. A screening technique for resistance evaluation to septoria blight (Septoria<br />
petroselini) in parsley (Petroselinum crispum). Beitr. Züchtungsforsch, 2: 250–253.<br />
Martinetti, L., E. Quattrini, M. Bononi, <strong>and</strong> F. Tateo, 2006. Effect <strong>of</strong> the mineral fertilization <strong>and</strong> the yield <strong>and</strong><br />
the oil content <strong>of</strong> two cultivars <strong>of</strong> rosemary. Acta Hort., 723: 399–404.<br />
Massoud, H. <strong>and</strong> C. Franz, 1990. Quantitative genetical aspects <strong>of</strong> Chamomilla recutita (L.) Rauschert.<br />
J. Essent. Oil Res., 2: 15–20.<br />
Massoud, H., M. Sharaf El-Din, R. Hassan, <strong>and</strong> A. Ramadan, 2002. Effect <strong>of</strong> salinity <strong>and</strong> some trace elements<br />
on growth <strong>and</strong> leaves essential oil content <strong>of</strong> thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.). J. Agricult. Res. Tanta Univ.,<br />
28: 856–873.<br />
Máthé, A. <strong>and</strong> Ch. Franz, 1999. Good agricultural practice <strong>and</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> phytomedicines. J. Herbs, Spices<br />
Med. Plants, 6: 101–113.<br />
Máthé, I., G. Nagy, A. Dobos, V.V. Miklossy, <strong>and</strong> G. Janicsak, 1996. Comparative studies <strong>of</strong> the essential oils<br />
<strong>of</strong> some species <strong>of</strong> Sect. Salvia. In Proc. 27th Int. Symp. on <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> (ISEO) Ch. Franz, A. Máthé,<br />
<strong>and</strong> G. Buchbauer (eds), pp. 244–247.<br />
Medicinal Plant Specialist Group, 2007. International St<strong>and</strong>ard for Sustainable Wild Collection <strong>of</strong> Medicinal<br />
<strong>and</strong> Aromatic Plants (ISSC-MAP). Version 1.0. Bundesamt für Naturschutz (BfN), MPSG/SSC/IUCN,<br />
WWF Germany, <strong>and</strong> TRAFFIC, Bonn, Gl<strong>and</strong>, Frankfurt, <strong>and</strong> Cambridge. BfN-Skripten 195.<br />
Menary, R.C., 1994. Factors influencing the yield <strong>and</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> essential oils, II: Nutrition, irrigation, plant<br />
growth regulators, harvesting <strong>and</strong> distillation. Proc. 4emes Rencontres Internationales Nyons, 116–138.<br />
Mendes, M.L. <strong>and</strong> A. Romano, 1997. In vitro cloning <strong>of</strong> Thymus mastichina L. field grown plants. Acta Hort.,<br />
502: 303–306.<br />
Minuto, G., A. Minuto, A. Garibaldi, <strong>and</strong> M.L. Gullino, 2006. Disease control <strong>of</strong> aromatic crops: Problems <strong>and</strong><br />
solutions. Int. Sympos Labiatae. San Remo, p. 33.<br />
Miraglia, M., K.G. Berdal, C. Brera, P. Corbisier, A. Holst-Jensen, E.J. Kok, H.J. Marvin, H. Schimmel,<br />
J. Rentsch, J.P. van Rie, <strong>and</strong> J. Zagon, 2004. Detection <strong>and</strong> traceability <strong>of</strong> genetically modified organisms<br />
in the food production chain. Food Chem. Toxicol., 42: 1157–1180.<br />
Mos<strong>and</strong>l, A., 1993. Neue Methoden zur herkunftsspezifischen Analyse aetherischer Oele. In Ätherische Öle—<br />
Anspruch und Wirklichkeit, R. Carle (ed.), pp. 103–134. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft.<br />
Mulas, M., A.H. Dias Francesconi, B. Perinu, E. Del Vais, 2002. Selection <strong>of</strong> Rosemary (Rosmarinus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis<br />
L.) cultivars to optimize biomass yield. In Breeding Research on Aromatic <strong>and</strong> Medicinal Plants,<br />
C.B. Johnson <strong>and</strong> Ch. Franz (eds), pp. 133–138. Binghampton: Haworth Press.<br />
Munoz-Bertomeu, J., I. Arrillaga, R. Ros, <strong>and</strong> J. Segura, 2006. Up-regulation <strong>of</strong> 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate<br />
synthase enhances production <strong>of</strong> essential oils in transgenic spike lavender. Plant Phys., 142: 890–900.<br />
Munsi, P.S. <strong>and</strong> Mukherjee, S.K., 1986. Response <strong>of</strong> Java citronella (Cymbopogon winterianus Jowitt.) to harvesting<br />
intervals with different nitrogen levels. Acta Hort., 188: 225–229.<br />
Murray, M.J., 1969. Induced Mutations in Plants. pp. 345–371, Vienna: IAEA.<br />
Murray, M.J. <strong>and</strong> R.H. Reitsema, 1954. The genetic basis <strong>of</strong> the ketones carvone <strong>and</strong> menthone in Mentha<br />
crispa L. J. Am. Pharmaceutical Assoc. (Sci. Ed.), 43: 612–613.<br />
Murray, M.J. <strong>and</strong> A.W. Todd, 1972. Registration <strong>of</strong> Todd’s Mitcham Peppermint. Crop Sci., 12: 128.<br />
Nair, M.K. 1982. Cultivation <strong>of</strong> spices. In Cultivation <strong>and</strong> Utilization <strong>of</strong> Aromatic Plants, C.K. Atal <strong>and</strong><br />
B.M. Kapur (eds), pp. 190–214. RRL-CSIR Jammu-Tawi.
Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 79<br />
Nebauer, S.G., I. Arrillaga, L. del Castillo-Agudo, <strong>and</strong> J. Segura, 2000. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated<br />
transformation <strong>of</strong> the aromatic shrub Lav<strong>and</strong>ula latifolia. Mol Breed., 6: 23–48.<br />
Nicola, S., J. Hoeberechts, <strong>and</strong> E. Fontana, 2006. Rooting products <strong>and</strong> cutting timing for peppermint (Mentha<br />
piperita L.) radication. Acta Hort., 723: 297–302.<br />
Niu, X., X. Li, P. Veronese, R.A. Bressan, S.C. Weller, <strong>and</strong> P.M. Hasegawa, 2000. Factors affecting Agrobacterium<br />
tumefaciens-mediated transformation <strong>of</strong> peppermint. Plant Cell Rep., 19: 304–310.<br />
Novak, J., S. Novak, <strong>and</strong> C. Franz, 1998. <strong>Essential</strong> oils <strong>of</strong> rhizomes <strong>and</strong> rootlets <strong>of</strong> Valeriana celtica L. ssp.<br />
norica Vierh. from Austria. J. Essent. Oil Res., 10: 637–640.<br />
Novak, J., S. Novak, C. Bitsch, <strong>and</strong> C. Franz, 2000. <strong>Essential</strong> oil composition <strong>of</strong> different populations <strong>of</strong><br />
Valeriana celtica ssp. from Austria <strong>and</strong> Italy. Flavour Fragr. J., 15: 40–42.<br />
Novak, J., C. Bitsch, F. Pank, J. Langbehn, <strong>and</strong> C. Franz, 2002. Distribution <strong>of</strong> the cis-sabinene hydrate acetate<br />
chemotype in accessions <strong>of</strong> marjoram (Origanum majorana L.). Euphytica, 127: 69–74.<br />
Novak, J., L. Bahoo, U. Mitteregger, <strong>and</strong> C. Franz, 2006a. Composition <strong>of</strong> individual essential oil gl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong><br />
savory (Satureja hortensis L., Lamiaceae) from Syria. Flavour Fragr. J., 21: 731–734.<br />
Novak, J., M. Marn, <strong>and</strong> C. Franz, 2006b. An a-pinene chemotype in Salvia <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L. (Lamiaceae). J. Essent.<br />
Oil Res., 18: 239–241.<br />
Novak, J., S. Grausgruber-Gröger, <strong>and</strong> B. Lukas, 2007. DNA-Barcoding <strong>of</strong> plant extracts. Food Res. Int.,<br />
40: 388–392.<br />
Novak, J., B. Lukas, <strong>and</strong> C. Franz, 2008. The essential oil composition <strong>of</strong> wild growing sweet marjoram (Origanum<br />
majorana L., Lamiaceae) from Cyprus—Three chemotypes. J. Essent. Oil Res., 20: 339–341.<br />
Omidbaigi, R. <strong>and</strong> A. Arjm<strong>and</strong>i, 2002. Effects <strong>of</strong> NP supply on growth, development, yield <strong>and</strong> active substances<br />
<strong>of</strong> garden thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.). Acta Hort., 576: 263–265.<br />
Pafundo, S., C. Agrimonti, <strong>and</strong> N. Marmiroli, 2005. Traceability <strong>of</strong> plant contribution in olive oil by amplified<br />
fragment length polymorphisms. J. Agric. Food Chem., 53: 6995–7002.<br />
Pank, F., E. Herbst, <strong>and</strong> C. Franz, 1991. Richtlinien für den integrierten Anbau von Arznei- und Gewürzpflanzen.<br />
Drogen Report, 4(S): 45–64.<br />
Pank, F., H. Krüger, <strong>and</strong> R. Quilitzsch, 1996. Selection <strong>of</strong> annual caraway (Carum carvi L. var. annuum hort.)<br />
on essential oil content <strong>and</strong> carvone in the maturity stage <strong>of</strong> milky-wax fruits. Beitr. Züchtungsforsch,<br />
2: 195–198.<br />
Pank, F., 2002. Three approaches to the development <strong>of</strong> high performance cultivars considering the different<br />
biological background <strong>of</strong> the starting material. Acta Hort., 576: 129–137.<br />
Pank, F., 2007. Use <strong>of</strong> breeding to customise characteristics <strong>of</strong> medicinal <strong>and</strong> aromatic plants to postharvest<br />
processing requirements. Stewart Postharvest Rev., 4: 1.<br />
Pank, J., H. Krüger, <strong>and</strong> R. Quilitzsch, 2007. Results <strong>of</strong> a polycross-test with annual caraway (Carum carvi<br />
L. var. annum hort.) Z. Arznei- u. Gewürzpfl , 12.<br />
Pennisi, E., 2007. Wanted: A DNA-barcode for plants. <strong>Science</strong>, 318: 190–191.<br />
Pickard, W.F., 2008. Laticifers <strong>and</strong> secretory ducts: Two other tube systems in plants. New Phytologist,<br />
177: 877–888.<br />
Pino, J.A., M. Estarrón,<strong>and</strong> V. Fuentes, 1997. <strong>Essential</strong> oil <strong>of</strong> sage (Salvia <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L.) grown in Cuba.<br />
J. Essent. Oil Res., 9: 221–222.<br />
Putievsky, E., U. Ravid, <strong>and</strong> N. Dudai, 1986. The essential oil <strong>and</strong> yield components from various plant parts<br />
<strong>of</strong> Salvia fruticosa. J. Nat. Prod., 49: 1015–1017.<br />
Putievsky, E., N. Dudai, <strong>and</strong> U. Ravid, 1996. Cultivation, selection <strong>and</strong> conservation <strong>of</strong> oregano species in<br />
Israel. In S. Padulosi (ed.) Proc. IPGRI Workshop Oregano, pp. 50–57.<br />
Ratnasingham, S. <strong>and</strong> P.D. N. Hebert, 2007. The barcode <strong>of</strong> life data system (http://www.barcodinglife.org).<br />
Mol. Ecol. Notes, 7: 355–364.<br />
Reales, A., D. Rivera, J.A. Palazón, <strong>and</strong> C. Obón, 2004. Numerical taxonomy study <strong>of</strong> Salvia sect. Salvia<br />
(Labiatae). Bot. J. Linnean Soc., 145: 353–371.<br />
Repčak, M., J. Halasova, R. Hončariv, <strong>and</strong> D. Podhradsky, 1980. The content <strong>and</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> the essential<br />
oil in the course <strong>of</strong> anthodium development in wild chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.). Biologia<br />
Plantarum, 22: 183–191.<br />
Repčak, M., P. Cernaj, <strong>and</strong> V. Oravec, 1992. The stability <strong>of</strong> a high content <strong>of</strong> a-bisabolol in chamomile. Acta<br />
Hort., 306: 324–326.<br />
Rey, C., 1993. Selection <strong>of</strong> thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.). Acta Hort., 344: 404–407.<br />
Salamon, I., 2007. Effect <strong>of</strong> the internal <strong>and</strong> external factors on yield <strong>and</strong> qualitative–quantitative characteristics<br />
<strong>of</strong> chamomile essential oil. Acta Hort., 749: 45–64.<br />
Saukel, J. <strong>and</strong> R. Länger, 1992. Die Achillea-millefolium-Gruppe in Mitteleuropa. Phyton, 32: 47–78.
80 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Schippmann, U., D. Leaman, <strong>and</strong> A.B. Cunningham, 2006. A comparison <strong>of</strong> cultivation <strong>and</strong> wild collection <strong>of</strong><br />
medicinal <strong>and</strong> aromatic plants under sustainability aspects. In Medicinal <strong>and</strong> Aromatic Plants, R.J. Bogers,<br />
L.E. Craker, D. Lange (eds), pp. 75–95. Dordrecht: Springer.<br />
Schmiderer, C., P. Grassi, J. Novak, M. Weber, <strong>and</strong> C. Franz, 2008. Diversity <strong>of</strong> essential oil gl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> clary<br />
sage (Salvia sclarea L., Lamiaceae). Plant Biol., 10: 433–440.<br />
Schröder, F.J., 1990. Untersuchungen über die Variabilität des ätherischen Öles in Einzelpflanzen verschiedener<br />
Populationen der echten Kamille, Matricaria chamomilla L. (syn. Chamomilla recutita L.).<br />
Dissertation, TU-München-Weihenstephan.<br />
Senatore, F. <strong>and</strong> D. Rigano, 2001. <strong>Essential</strong> oil <strong>of</strong> two Lippia spp. (Verbenaceae) growing wild in Guatemala.<br />
Flavour Fragr. J., 16: 169–171.<br />
Skoula, M., I. El-Hilalo, <strong>and</strong> A. Makris, 1999. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the genetic diversity <strong>of</strong> Salvia fruticosa Mill.<br />
clones using RAPD markers <strong>and</strong> comparison with the essential oil pr<strong>of</strong>iles. Biochem. Syst. Ecol.,<br />
27: 559–568.<br />
Skoula, M., J.E. Abbes, <strong>and</strong> C.B. Johnson, 2000. Genetic variation <strong>of</strong> volatiles <strong>and</strong> rosmarinic acid in populations<br />
<strong>of</strong> Salvia fruticosa Mill. Growing in crete. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 28: 551–561.<br />
Skoula, M. <strong>and</strong> J.B. Harborne, 2002. The taxonomy <strong>and</strong> chemistry <strong>of</strong> Origanum. In Oregano-The Genera<br />
Origanum <strong>and</strong> Lippia, S.E. Kintzios (ed.), pp. 67–108. London: Taylor & Francis.<br />
Slavova, Y., F. Zayova, <strong>and</strong> S. Krastev, 2004. Polyploidization <strong>of</strong> lavender (Lav<strong>and</strong>ula vera) in-vitro. Bulgarian<br />
J. Agric. Sci., 10: 329–332.<br />
Sobti, S.N., P. Pushpangadan, R.K. Thapa, S.G. Aggarwal, V.N. Vashist, <strong>and</strong> C.K. Atal, 1978. Chemical <strong>and</strong><br />
genetic investigations in essential oils <strong>of</strong> some Ocimum species, their F1 hybrids <strong>and</strong> synthesized allopolyploids.<br />
Lloydia, 41: 50–55.<br />
Srivastava, A.K., S.K. Srivastava, <strong>and</strong> K.V. Syamasundar, 2005. Bud <strong>and</strong> leaf essential oil composition <strong>of</strong><br />
Syzygium aromaticum from India <strong>and</strong> Madagascar. Flavour Fragr. J., 20: 51–53.<br />
Stanley, P.C. <strong>and</strong> J.A. Steyermark, 1976. Flora <strong>of</strong> Guatemala: Botany. Chicago: Field Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural<br />
History.<br />
Steinlesberger, H., 2002. Investigations on progenies <strong>of</strong> crossing exeriments <strong>of</strong> Bulgarian <strong>and</strong> Austrian yarrows<br />
(Achillea millefolium agg., Compositae) with focus on the enantiomeric ratios <strong>of</strong> selected Monoterpenes,<br />
Dissertation, Vet. Med. Univ. Wien.<br />
Svoboda, K.P., T.G. Svoboda, <strong>and</strong> A.D. Syred, 2000. Secretory Structures <strong>of</strong> Aromatic <strong>and</strong> Medicinal Plants.<br />
Middle Travelly: Microscopix Publications.<br />
Taberlet, P., L. Gielly, G. Pautou, <strong>and</strong> J. Bouvet, 1991. Universal primers for amplification <strong>of</strong> three non-coding<br />
regions <strong>of</strong> chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol. Biol., 17: 1105–1109.<br />
Taviani, P., D. Rosellini, <strong>and</strong> F. Veronesi, 2002. Variation for Agronomic <strong>and</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil traits among wild<br />
populations <strong>of</strong> Chamomilla recutita (L.) Rauschert from Central Italy, In Breeding Research on Aromatic<br />
<strong>and</strong> Medicinal Plants, C.B. Johnson, Ch. Franz (eds), pp. 353–358. Binghampton: Haworth Press.<br />
Taylor, R. 1996. Tea tree—Boosting oil production. Rural Res., 172: 17–18.<br />
Tsiri, D., O. Kretsi, I.B. Chinou, <strong>and</strong> C.G. Spyropoulos, 2003. Composition <strong>of</strong> fruit volatiles <strong>and</strong> annual changes<br />
in the volatiles <strong>of</strong> leaves <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn. growing in Greece. Flavour Fragr. J.,<br />
18: 244–247.<br />
Uribe-Hernández, C.J., J.B. Hurtado-Ramos, E.R. Olmedo-Arcega, <strong>and</strong> M.A. Martinez-Sosa, 1992. The essential<br />
oil <strong>of</strong> Lippia graveolens HBK from Jalsico, Mexico. J. Essent. Oil Res., 4: 647–649.<br />
Van Overwalle, G., 2006. Intellectual property protection for medicinal <strong>and</strong> aromatic plants. In Medicinal <strong>and</strong><br />
Aromatic Plants, J. Bogers, L.E. Craker, D. Lange (eds), pp. 121–128. Dordrecht: Springer.<br />
Velasco-Neguerelo, A., J. Pérez-Alonso, P.L. Pérez de Paz, C. García Vallejo, J. Palá-Paúl, <strong>and</strong> A. Inigo, 2002.<br />
Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the essential oils from the roots, fruits, leaves <strong>and</strong> stems <strong>of</strong> Pimpinella cumbrae<br />
link growing in the Canary Isl<strong>and</strong>s (Spain). Flavour Fragr. J., 17: 468–471.<br />
Vernet, P., 1976. Analyse génétique et écologique de la variabilité de l’essence de Thymus vulgaris L. (Labiée),<br />
PhD thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Montpellier, France.<br />
Vernin, G., J. Metzger, D. Fraisse, <strong>and</strong> D. Scharff, 1984. Analysis <strong>of</strong> basil oils by GC-MS data bank. Perf.<br />
Flavour, 9: 71–86.<br />
Vernin, G., C. Lageot, E.M. Gaydou, <strong>and</strong> C. Parkanyi, 2001. Analysis <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Lippia graveolens<br />
HBK from El Salvador. Flavour Fragr. J., 16: 219–226.<br />
Vetter, S. <strong>and</strong> C. Franz, 1996. Seed production in selfings <strong>of</strong> tetraploid Achillea species (Asteraceae), Beitr.<br />
Züchtungsforsch, 2: 124–126.<br />
Vetter, S., C. Franz, S. Glasl, U. Kastner, J. Saukel, <strong>and</strong> J. Jurenitsch, 1997. Inheritance <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpene lactone<br />
types within the Achillea millefolium complex (Compositae). Plant Breeding, 116: 79–82.
Sources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 81<br />
Viljoen, A.M., A. Gono-Bwalya, G.P.P. Kamatao, K.H.C. Baser, <strong>and</strong> B. Demirci, 2006. The essential oil composition<br />
<strong>and</strong> chemotaxonomy <strong>of</strong> Salvia stenophylla <strong>and</strong> its Allies S. repens <strong>and</strong> S. runcinata. J. Essent.<br />
Oil Res., 18: 37–45.<br />
Weising, K., H. Nybom, K. Wolff, G. Kahl, 2005. DNA Fingerpinting in Plants. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor &<br />
Francis.<br />
Werker, E., 1993. Function <strong>of</strong> essential oil-secreting gl<strong>and</strong>ular hiars in aromatic plants <strong>of</strong> the Lamiaceae—A<br />
review. Flavour Fragr. J., 8: 249–255.<br />
Wijesekera. R., A.L. Jajewardene, <strong>and</strong> L.S. Rajapakse, 1974. Composition <strong>of</strong> the essential oils from leaves,<br />
stem bark <strong>and</strong> root bark <strong>of</strong> two chemotypes <strong>of</strong> cinnamom. J. Sci. Food Agric., 25: 1211–1218.<br />
Wildung, M.R. <strong>and</strong> R.B. Croteau, 2005. Genetic engineering <strong>of</strong> peppermint for improved essential oil composition<br />
<strong>and</strong> yield. Transgenic Res., 14: 365–372.<br />
WHO. 2003. Guidelines on Good Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Collection Practices (GACP) for Medicinal Plants. Geneva:<br />
World Health Organization.<br />
Wogiatzi, E., D. Tassiopoulos, <strong>and</strong> R. Marquard, 1999. Untersuchungen an Kamillen- Wildsammlungen aus<br />
Griechenl<strong>and</strong>. Fachtagg. Arznei- u. Gewürzpfl. Gießen, 186–192. Gießen: Köhler.<br />
Wolfe, A.D. <strong>and</strong> A. Liston, 1998. Contributions <strong>of</strong> PCR-based methods to plant systematics <strong>and</strong> evolutionary<br />
biology. In Molecular Systematics <strong>of</strong> Plants II: DNA Sequencing. D.E. Soltis, P.S. Soltis, <strong>and</strong> J. Doyle<br />
(eds), pp. 43–86. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.<br />
Worku, T. <strong>and</strong> M. Bertoldi, 1996. <strong>Essential</strong> oils at different development stages <strong>of</strong> Ethiopian Tagetes minuta<br />
L. In <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>: Basic <strong>and</strong> Applied Research, Ch. Franz, A. Máthé, G. Buchbauer (eds), pp. 339–341.<br />
Carol Stream: Allured Publishing.<br />
Zheljazkov, V.D. <strong>and</strong> N. Nielsen, 1996. Studies on the effect <strong>of</strong> heavy metals (Cd, Pb, Cu, Mn, Zn <strong>and</strong> Fe) upon<br />
the growth, productivity <strong>and</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> lavender (Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia Mill.) production. J. Essent. Oil<br />
Res., 8: 259–274.<br />
Zheljazkov, V.D., N. Kovatcheva, S. Stanev, <strong>and</strong> E. Zheljazkova, 1997. Effect <strong>of</strong> heavy metal polluted soils on<br />
some qualitative <strong>and</strong> quantitative characters <strong>of</strong> mint <strong>and</strong> cornmint. In <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>: Basic <strong>and</strong> Applied<br />
Research, Ch. Franz, A. Máthé, G. Buchbauer (eds), pp. 128–131. Carol Stream: Allured Publishing.
4<br />
Production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Erich Schmidt<br />
CONTENTS<br />
4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 83<br />
4.1.1 General Remarks ..................................................................................................... 83<br />
4.1.2 Definition <strong>and</strong> History ............................................................................................. 85<br />
4.1.3 Production ................................................................................................................ 88<br />
4.1.4 Climate ..................................................................................................................... 89<br />
4.1.5 Soil Quality <strong>and</strong> Soil Preparation ............................................................................ 90<br />
4.1.6 Water Stress <strong>and</strong> Drought ........................................................................................ 90<br />
4.1.7 Insect Stress <strong>and</strong> Microorganisms ........................................................................... 90<br />
4.1.8 Location <strong>of</strong> Oil Cells ................................................................................................ 91<br />
4.1.9 Types <strong>of</strong> Biomass Used ............................................................................................ 91<br />
4.1.10 Timing <strong>of</strong> the Harvest .............................................................................................. 91<br />
4.1.11 Agricultural Crop Establishment ............................................................................. 92<br />
4.1.12 Propagation from Seed <strong>and</strong> Clones .......................................................................... 94<br />
4.1.13 Commercial <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Extraction Methods ....................................................... 95<br />
4.1.14 Expression ................................................................................................................ 95<br />
4.1.15 Steam Distillation .................................................................................................... 99<br />
4.1.16 Concluding Remarks ................................................................................................ 117<br />
Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................ 118<br />
References .................................................................................................................................... 118<br />
4.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
4.1.1 GENERAL REMARKS<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils have become an integral part <strong>of</strong> everyday life. They are used in a great variety <strong>of</strong><br />
ways: as food flavorings, as feed additives, as flavoring agents by the cigarette industry, <strong>and</strong> in the<br />
compounding <strong>of</strong> cosmetics <strong>and</strong> perfumes. Furthermore, they are used in air fresheners <strong>and</strong> deodorizers<br />
as well as in all branches <strong>of</strong> medicine such as in pharmacy, balneology, massage, <strong>and</strong> homeopathy.<br />
A more specialized area will be in the fields <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy <strong>and</strong> aromachology. In recent<br />
years, the importance <strong>of</strong> essential oils as biocides <strong>and</strong> insect repellents has led to a more detailed<br />
study <strong>of</strong> their antimicrobial potential. <strong>Essential</strong> oils are also good natural sources <strong>of</strong> substances with<br />
commercial potential as starting materials for chemical synthesis.<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils have been known to mankind for hundreds <strong>of</strong> years, even millenniums. Long<br />
before the fragrances themselves were used, the important action <strong>of</strong> the oils as remedies was recognized.<br />
Without the medical care as we enjoy in our time, self-healing was the only option to combat<br />
parasites or the suffering <strong>of</strong> the human body. Later on essential oils were used in the preparation <strong>of</strong><br />
early cosmetics, powders, <strong>and</strong> soaps. As the industrial production <strong>of</strong> synthetic chemicals started <strong>and</strong><br />
83
84 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
increased during the nineteenth century, the production <strong>of</strong> essential oils also increased owing to<br />
their importance to our way <strong>of</strong> life.<br />
The quantities <strong>of</strong> essential oils produced around the world vary widely. The annual output <strong>of</strong><br />
some essential oils exceeds 35,000 tons while that <strong>of</strong> others may reach only a few kilograms. Some<br />
production figures, in metric tons, based on the year 2004 are shown in Table 4.1.<br />
Equally wide variations also occur in the monetary value <strong>of</strong> different essential oils. Prices range<br />
from $1.80/kg for orange oil to $120,000.00/kg for orris oil. The total annual value <strong>of</strong> the world<br />
market is <strong>of</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> several billions <strong>of</strong> USD. A large, but variable, labor force is involved in the<br />
production <strong>of</strong> essential oils. While in some cases, harvesting <strong>and</strong> oil production will require just a<br />
few workers, other cases will require manual harvesting <strong>and</strong> may require multiple working steps.<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oil production from either wild-growing or from cultivated plants is possible almost anywhere,<br />
excluding the world’s coldest, permanently snow-covered regions. It is estimated that the<br />
global number <strong>of</strong> plant species is <strong>of</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> 300,000. About 10% <strong>of</strong> these contain essential oils<br />
<strong>and</strong> could be used as a source for their production. All continents possess their own characteristic<br />
flora with many odor-producing species. Occasionally, these plants may be confined to a particular<br />
geographical zone such as Santalum album to India <strong>and</strong> Timor in Indonesia, Pinus mugo to the<br />
European Alps, or Abies sibirica to the CIS [Commonwealth <strong>of</strong> Independent States (former<br />
Russia)]. For many countries, mainly in Africa <strong>and</strong> Asia, essential oil production is their main<br />
source <strong>of</strong> exports. <strong>Essential</strong> oil export figures for Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Vietnam, <strong>and</strong> even India<br />
are very high.<br />
Main producer countries are found in every continent. In Europe, the center <strong>of</strong> production is situated<br />
in the countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea: Italy, Spain, Portugal, France, Croatia,<br />
Albania, <strong>and</strong> Greece, as well as middle-eastern Israel, all <strong>of</strong> which produce essential oils in industrial<br />
quantities. Among Central European countries, Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, <strong>and</strong> Ukraine<br />
should be mentioned. The huge Russian Federation spread over much <strong>of</strong> eastern Europe <strong>and</strong> northern<br />
Asia has not only nearly endless resources <strong>of</strong> wild-growing plants but also large areas <strong>of</strong> cultivated<br />
l<strong>and</strong>. The Asian continent with its diversity <strong>of</strong> climates appears to be the most important<br />
TABLE 4.1<br />
Production Figures <strong>of</strong> Important <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> (2008)<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> Oil<br />
Production in Metric<br />
Tons (2008) Main Production Countries<br />
Orange oils 51000 USA, Brasil, Argentina<br />
Cornmint oil 32000 India, China, Argentina<br />
Lemon oils 9200 Argentina, Italy, Spain<br />
Eucalyptus oils 4000 China, India, Australia, South Africa<br />
Peppermint oil 3300 India, USA, China<br />
Clove leaf oil 1800 Indonesia, Madagascar<br />
Citronella oil 1800 China, Sri Lanka<br />
Spearmint oils 1800 USA, China<br />
Cedarwood oils 1650 USA, China<br />
Litsea cubeba oil 1200 China<br />
Patchouli oil 1200 Indonesia, India<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>in oil Grosso 1100 France<br />
Corymbia Citriodora 1000 China, Brazil, India, Vietnam<br />
Source: Perfumer & Flavorist, 2009. A preliminary report on the world production <strong>of</strong> some<br />
selected essential oils <strong>and</strong> countries, Vol. 34, January 2009.
Production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 85<br />
EO production worldwide quantities figures 2008 (partly esteemed)<br />
India; 25.8%<br />
Indonesia; 1.9%<br />
Hungary; 0.1%<br />
Marocco; 0.1%<br />
South Africa; 1.0%<br />
Vietnam; 0.1%<br />
Others; 10.0%<br />
USA; 16.8%<br />
France; 1.0%<br />
Argentina; 4.9%<br />
China; 9.0%<br />
Egypt; 0.1%<br />
Brasil; 28.6%<br />
Australia; 0.6%<br />
FIGURE 4.1 Production countries <strong>and</strong> essential oil production worldwide (2008). (Adapted from Perfumer<br />
& Flavorist, 2009. A preliminary report on the world production <strong>of</strong> some selected essential oils <strong>and</strong> countries,<br />
Vol. 34, January 2009.)<br />
producer <strong>of</strong> essential oils. China <strong>and</strong> India play a major role followed by Indonesia, Sri Lanka, <strong>and</strong><br />
Vietnam. Many unique <strong>and</strong> unusual essential oils originate from the huge Australian continent <strong>and</strong><br />
from neighboring New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> New Caledonia. Major essential oil-producing countries in<br />
Africa include Morocco, Tunisia, Egypt, <strong>and</strong> Algeria with the Ivory Coast, South Africa, Ghana,<br />
Kenya, Tanzania, Ug<strong>and</strong>a, <strong>and</strong> Ethiopia playing a minor role. The important spice-producing isl<strong>and</strong>s<br />
<strong>of</strong> Madagascar, the Comoros, Mayotte, <strong>and</strong> Réunion are situated along the eastern coast <strong>of</strong> the<br />
African continent. The American continent is also one <strong>of</strong> the biggest essential oil producers. The<br />
United States, Canada, <strong>and</strong> Mexico possess a wealth <strong>of</strong> natural aromatic plant material. In South<br />
America, essential oils are produced in Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay, Guatemala, <strong>and</strong> the<br />
isl<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> Haiti. Apart from the above-mentioned major essential oil-producing countries there are<br />
many more, somewhat less important ones, such as Germany, Taiwan, Japan, Jamaica, <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Philippines. Figure 4.1 shows production countries <strong>and</strong> essential oil production worldwide (2008).<br />
Cultivation <strong>of</strong> aromatic plants shifted during the last two centuries. From 1850 to 1950, the centers<br />
<strong>of</strong> commercial cultivation <strong>of</strong> essential oil plants have been the Provence in France, Italy, Spain,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Portugal. With the increase <strong>of</strong> labor costs, this shifted to the Mediterranean regions <strong>of</strong> North<br />
Africa. As manual harvesting proved too expensive for European conditions, <strong>and</strong> following improvements<br />
in the design <strong>of</strong> harvesting machinery, only those crops that lend themselves to mechanical<br />
harvesting continued to be grown in Europe. By the early 1990s, even North Africa proved too<br />
expensive <strong>and</strong> the centers <strong>of</strong> cultivation moved to China <strong>and</strong> India. At the present time, manualh<strong>and</strong>ling<br />
methods are tending to become too costly even in China <strong>and</strong>, thus India remains as today’s<br />
center for the cultivation <strong>of</strong> fragrant plant crops.<br />
4.1.2 DEFINITION AND HISTORY<br />
Not all odorous extracts <strong>of</strong> essential oil-bearing plants comply with the International St<strong>and</strong>ards<br />
Organization (ISO) definition <strong>of</strong> an “<strong>Essential</strong> Oil.” An essential oil as defined by the ISO in document<br />
ISO 9235.2—aromatic natural raw materials—vocabulary is as follows.<br />
“Product obtained from vegetable raw material—either by distillation with water or steam<br />
or—from the epicarp <strong>of</strong> Citrus fruits by a mechanical process, or—by dry distillation” (ISO/DIS 9235.2,
86 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
1997, p. 2). Steam distillation can be carried out with or without added water in a still. By contrast,<br />
dry distillation <strong>of</strong> plant material is carried out without the addition <strong>of</strong> any water or steam to the still<br />
(ISO 9235, 1997). Note 2 in Section 3.1.1 <strong>of</strong> ISO/DIS 9235.2 is <strong>of</strong> importance. It states that “<strong>Essential</strong><br />
oils may undergo physical treatments (e.g., re-distillation, aeration) which do not involve significant<br />
changes in their composition” (ISO/DIS 9235.2, 1997, p. 2).<br />
An alternative definition <strong>of</strong> essential oils, established by Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Dr. Gerhard Buchbauer <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, includes the following suggestion:<br />
“<strong>Essential</strong> oils are more or less volatile substances with more or less odorous impact, produced<br />
either by steam distillation or dry distillation or by means <strong>of</strong> a mechanical treatment from one single<br />
species” (25th International Symposium on <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, 1994). This appears to suggest that<br />
mixing several different plant species within the production process is not allowed. As an example,<br />
the addition <strong>of</strong> lav<strong>and</strong>in plants to lavender plants will yield a natural essential oil but not a natural<br />
lavender essential oil. Likewise, wild-growing varieties <strong>of</strong> Thymus will not result in a thyme oil as<br />
different chemotypes will totally change the composition <strong>of</strong> the oil. It follows that blending <strong>of</strong><br />
different chemotypes <strong>of</strong> the same botanical species is inadmissible as it will change the chemical<br />
composition <strong>and</strong> properties <strong>of</strong> the final product. However, in view <strong>of</strong> the global acceptance <strong>of</strong> some<br />
specific essential oils there will be exceptions. For example, Oil <strong>of</strong> Geranium ISO/DIS 4730, is<br />
obtained from Pelargonium ¥ ssp., for example, from hybrids <strong>of</strong> uncertain parentage rather than<br />
from a single botanical species (ISO/DIS 4731, 2005). It is a well established <strong>and</strong> important article<br />
<strong>of</strong> commerce <strong>and</strong> may, thus, be considered to be an acceptable exception. In reality it is impossible<br />
to define “one single species” as many essential oils being found on the market come from different<br />
plant species. Even in ISO drafts it is confirmed that various plants are allowed. There are several<br />
examples like rosewood oils, distilled from Aniba rosaedora <strong>and</strong> Aniba parvifl ora, two different<br />
plant species. The same happens with the oil <strong>of</strong> gum turpentine from China, where mainly Pinus<br />
massoniana will be used, beside other Pinus species. Eucalyptus provides another example: <strong>Oils</strong><br />
produced in Portugal have been produced from hybrids such as Eucalyptus globulus subsp. globulus<br />
¥ Eucalyptus globulus subsp. bicostata <strong>and</strong> Eucalyptus globulus subsp. globulus ¥ Eucalyptus<br />
globulus subsp. Euca lyptus globulus subsp. pseudoglobulus. These subspecies were observed from<br />
various botanists as separate species. The Chinese eucalyptus oils coming from the Sichuan province<br />
are derived from Cinnamomum longipaniculatum. Oil <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca (terpinen-4-ol type) is<br />
produced from Melaleuca alternifolia <strong>and</strong> in smaller amounts also from Melaleuca linariifolia <strong>and</strong><br />
Melaleuca dissitifl ora. For the future, this definition must be discussed on the level <strong>of</strong> ISO rules.<br />
Products obtained by other extraction methods, such as solvent extracts, including supercritical<br />
carbon dioxide extracts, concretes or pomades, <strong>and</strong> absolutes as well as resinoids, <strong>and</strong> oleoresins are<br />
not essential oils as they do not comply with the earlier mentioned definition. Likewise, products<br />
obtained by enzymic treatment <strong>of</strong> plant material do not meet the requirements <strong>of</strong> the definition <strong>of</strong><br />
an essential oil. There exists, though, at least one exception that ought to be mentioned. The wellknown<br />
“essential oil” <strong>of</strong> wine yeast, an important flavor <strong>and</strong> fragrance ingredient, is derived from a<br />
microorganism <strong>and</strong> not from a plant.<br />
In many instances, the commercial terms used to describe perfumery products as essential oils<br />
are either wrong or misleading. So-called “artificial essential oils,” “nature-identical essential oils,”<br />
“reconstructed essential oils,” <strong>and</strong> in some cases even “essential oils complying with the constants<br />
<strong>of</strong> pharmacopoeias” are merely synthetic mixtures <strong>of</strong> perfumery ingredients <strong>and</strong> have nothing to do<br />
with pure <strong>and</strong> natural essential oils.<br />
Opinions differ as to the historical origins <strong>of</strong> essential oil production. According to some, China<br />
has been the cradle <strong>of</strong> hydrodistillation while others point to the Indus Culture (Levey, 1959; Zahn,<br />
1979). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, some reports also credit the Arabs as being the inventors <strong>of</strong> distillation.<br />
Some literature reports suggest that the earliest practical apparatus for water distillation has been<br />
dated from the Indus Culture <strong>of</strong> some 5000 years ago. However, no written documents have been<br />
found to substantiate these claims (Levey, 1955; Zahn, 1979). The earliest documented records <strong>of</strong> a<br />
method <strong>and</strong> apparatus <strong>of</strong> what appears to be a kind <strong>of</strong> distillation procedure were published by Levy
Production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 87<br />
from the High Culture <strong>of</strong> Mesopotamia (Levey, 1959b). He described a kind <strong>of</strong> cooking pot from<br />
Tepe Gaure in northeastern Mesopotamia, which differed from the design <strong>of</strong> cooking pots <strong>of</strong> that<br />
period. It was made <strong>of</strong> brown clay, 53 cm in diameter <strong>and</strong> 48 cm high. Its special feature was a channel<br />
between the raised edges. The total volume <strong>of</strong> the pot was 37 L <strong>and</strong> that <strong>of</strong> the channel was<br />
2.1 L. As the pot was only half-filled when in use the process appears to represent a true distillation.<br />
While the Arabs appear to be, apart from the existence <strong>of</strong> the pot discovered in Mesopotamia, the<br />
inventors <strong>of</strong> hydrodistillation, we ought to go back 3000 years b.c.<br />
The archaeological museum <strong>of</strong> Texila in Pakistan has on exhibit a kind <strong>of</strong> distillation apparatus<br />
made <strong>of</strong> burnt clay. At first sight, it really has the appearance <strong>of</strong> a typical distillation apparatus but<br />
it is more likely that at that time it was used for the purification <strong>of</strong> water (Rovesti, 1977). Apart from<br />
that the assembly resembles an eighteenth century distillation plant (Figure 4.2). It was again Levy<br />
who demonstrated the importance <strong>of</strong> the distillation culture. Fire was known to be <strong>of</strong> greatest<br />
importance. Initial heating, the intensity <strong>of</strong> the heat, <strong>and</strong> its maintenance at a constant level right<br />
down to the cooling process were known to be important parameters. The creative ability to produce<br />
natural odors points to the fact that the art <strong>of</strong> distillation was a serious science in ancient<br />
Mesopotamia. While the art <strong>of</strong> distillation had been undergoing improvements right up to the eighth<br />
century, it was never mentioned in connection with essential oils, merely with its usefulness for<br />
alchemical or medicinal purposes (“Liber servitorius” <strong>of</strong> Albukasis). In brief, concentration <strong>and</strong><br />
purification <strong>of</strong> alcohol appeared to be its main reason for being in existence, its “raison d’être” (Koll<br />
<strong>and</strong> Kowalczyk, 1957).<br />
The Mesopotamian art <strong>of</strong> distillation had been revived in ancient Egypt as well as being exp<strong>and</strong>ed<br />
by the expression <strong>of</strong> citrus oils. The ancient Egyptians improved these processes largely because<br />
<strong>of</strong> their uses in embalming. They also extracted, in addition to myrrh <strong>and</strong> storax, the exudates <strong>of</strong><br />
certain East African coastal species <strong>of</strong> Boswellia, none <strong>of</strong> which are <strong>of</strong> course essential oils. The<br />
thirteenth century Arabian writer Ad-Dimaschki also provided a description <strong>of</strong> the distillation process,<br />
adding descriptions <strong>of</strong> the production <strong>of</strong> distilled rose water as well as <strong>of</strong> the earliest improved<br />
cooling systems. It should be understood that the products <strong>of</strong> these practices were not essential oils<br />
in the present accepted sense but merely fragrant distilled water extracts exhibiting the odor <strong>of</strong> the<br />
plant used.<br />
The next important step in the transfer <strong>of</strong> the practice <strong>of</strong> distillation to the Occident, from ancient<br />
Egypt to the northern hemisphere, was triggered by the crusades <strong>of</strong> the Middle Ages from the<br />
twelfth century onward. Hieronymus Brunschwyk listed in his treatise “The true art to distil” about<br />
FIGURE 4.2 Reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the distillation plant from Harappa.
88 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
25 essential oils produced at that time. Once again one should treat the expression “essential oils”<br />
with caution; it would be more accurate to refer to them as “fragrant alcohols” or “aromatic waters.”<br />
Improvements in the design <strong>of</strong> equipment led to an enrichment in the diversity <strong>of</strong> essential oils<br />
derived from starting materials such as cinnamon, s<strong>and</strong>alwood, <strong>and</strong> also sage <strong>and</strong> rosemary<br />
(Gildemeister <strong>and</strong> H<strong>of</strong>fmann, 1931).<br />
The first evidence capable to discriminate between volatile oils <strong>and</strong> odorous fatty oils was provided<br />
in the sixteenth century. The availability <strong>of</strong> printed books facilitated “scientists” seeking<br />
guidance on the distillation <strong>of</strong> essential oils. While knowledge <strong>of</strong> the science <strong>of</strong> essential oils did not<br />
increase during the seventeenth century, the eighteenth century brought about only small progress<br />
in the design <strong>of</strong> equipment <strong>and</strong> in refinements <strong>of</strong> the techniques used. The beginning <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth<br />
century brought about progresses in chemistry, including wet analysis, <strong>and</strong> restarted again,<br />
chiefly in France, in an increased development <strong>of</strong> hydrodistillation methods. Notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing the<br />
“industrial” production <strong>of</strong> lavender already in progress since the mid-eighteenth century, the real<br />
breakthrough occurred at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the following century. While until then the distillation<br />
plant was walled in, now the first moveable apparatus appeared. The “Alambique Vial Gattefossé”<br />
was easy to transport <strong>and</strong> placed near the fields. It resulted in improved product quality <strong>and</strong> reduced<br />
the length <strong>of</strong> transport. These stills were fired with wood or dried plant material. The first swiveling<br />
still pots had also been developed which facilitated the emptying <strong>of</strong> the still residues. These early<br />
stills had a capacity <strong>of</strong> about 50–100 kg <strong>of</strong> plant material. Later on their capacity increased to<br />
1000–1200 kg. At the same time, cooling methods were also improved. These improvements spread<br />
all over the northern hemisphere to Bulgaria, Turkey, Italy, Spain, Portugal, <strong>and</strong> even to northern<br />
Africa. The final chapter in the history <strong>of</strong> distillation <strong>of</strong> plant material came about with the invention<br />
<strong>of</strong> the “alembic à bain-marie,” technically speaking a double-walled distillation plant. Steam<br />
was not only passed through the biomass, but was also used to heat the wall <strong>of</strong> the still. This new<br />
method improved the speed <strong>of</strong> the distillation as well as the quality <strong>of</strong> the top notes <strong>of</strong> the essential<br />
oils thus produced.<br />
The history <strong>of</strong> the expression <strong>of</strong> essential oils from the epicarp <strong>of</strong> citrus fruits is not nearly as<br />
interesting as that <strong>of</strong> hydrodistillation. This can be attributed to the fact that these expressed<br />
fragrance concentrates were more readily available in antiquity as expression could be effected by<br />
implements made <strong>of</strong> wood or stone. The chief requirement for this method was manpower <strong>and</strong> that<br />
was available in unlimited amount. The growth <strong>of</strong> the industry led to the invention <strong>of</strong> new, <strong>and</strong> to<br />
the improvement <strong>of</strong> existing machinery, but this topic will be dealt with later on.<br />
4.1.3 PRODUCTION<br />
Before dealing with the basic principles <strong>of</strong> essential oil production it is important to be aware <strong>of</strong> the<br />
fact that the essential oil we have in our bottles or drums is not necessarily identical with what is<br />
present in the plant. It is wishful thinking, apart for some rare exceptions, to consider an “essential<br />
oil” to be the “soul” <strong>of</strong> the plant <strong>and</strong> thus an exact replica <strong>of</strong> what is present in the plant. Only<br />
expressed oils that have not come into contact with the fruit juice <strong>and</strong> that have been protected from<br />
aerial oxidation may meet the conditions <strong>of</strong> a true plant essential oil. The chemical composition <strong>of</strong><br />
distilled essential oils is not the same as that <strong>of</strong> the contents <strong>of</strong> the oil cells present in the plant or<br />
with the odor <strong>of</strong> the plants growing in their natural environment. Headspace technology, a unique<br />
method allowing the capture <strong>of</strong> the volatile constituents <strong>of</strong> oil cells <strong>and</strong> thus providing additional<br />
information about the plant, has made it possible to detect the volatile components <strong>of</strong> the plant’s<br />
“aura.” One <strong>of</strong> the best examples is rose oil. A nonpr<strong>of</strong>essional individual examining pure <strong>and</strong> natural<br />
rose oil on a plotter, even in dilution, will not recognize its plant source. The alteration caused<br />
by hydrodistillation is remarkable as plant material in contact with steam undergoes many chemical<br />
changes. Hot steam contains more energy than, for example, the surface <strong>of</strong> the still. Human skin<br />
that has come into contact with hot steam suffers tremendous injuries while short contact with a<br />
metal surface at 100°C results merely in a short burning sensation. Hot steam will decompose many
Production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 89<br />
aldehydes <strong>and</strong> esters may be formed from acids generated during the vaporization <strong>of</strong> certain essential<br />
oil components. Some water soluble molecules may be lost by solution in the still water, thus<br />
altering the fragrance pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the oil.<br />
Why do so many plants produce essential oils? Certainly neither to regale our nose with pleasant<br />
fragrances <strong>of</strong> rose or lavender, nor to heighten the taste (as taste is mostly related to odor) <strong>of</strong><br />
ginger, basil, pepper, thyme, or oregano in our food! Nor to cure diseases <strong>of</strong> the human body or<br />
influence human behavior! Most essential oils contain compounds possessing antimicrobial<br />
properties, active against viruses, bacteria, <strong>and</strong> fungi. Often, different parts <strong>of</strong> the same plant,<br />
such as leaves, roots, flowers, <strong>and</strong> so on may contain volatile oils <strong>of</strong> different chemical composition.<br />
Even the height <strong>of</strong> a plant may play a role. For example, the volatile oil obtained from the<br />
gum <strong>of</strong> the trunk <strong>of</strong> Pinus pinaster at a height <strong>of</strong> 2 m will contain mainly pinenes <strong>and</strong> significant<br />
car-3-ene, while oil obtained from the gum collected at a height <strong>of</strong> 4 m will contain very little or<br />
no car-3-ene. The reason for this may be protection from deer that browse the bark during the<br />
winter months. Some essential oils may act not only as insect repellents but even prevent their<br />
reproduction. In many cases, it has been shown that plants attract insects that in turn assist in<br />
pollinating the plant. It has also been shown that some plants communicate through the agency<br />
<strong>of</strong> their essential oils. Sometimes essential oils are considered to be simply metabolic waste products!<br />
This may be so in the case <strong>of</strong> eucalypts as the oil cells present in the mature leaves <strong>of</strong><br />
Eucalyptus species are completely isolated <strong>and</strong> embedded deeply within the leaf structure. In<br />
some cases essential oils act as germination inhibitors thus reducing competition by other plants<br />
(Porter, 2001).<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oil yields vary widely <strong>and</strong> are difficult to predict. The highest oil yields are usually<br />
associated with balsams <strong>and</strong> similar resinous plant exudations, such as gurjun, copaiba, elemi, <strong>and</strong><br />
Peru balsam, where they can reach 30–70%. Clove buds <strong>and</strong> nutmeg can yield between 15% <strong>and</strong><br />
17% <strong>of</strong> essential oil while other examples worthy <strong>of</strong> mention are cardamom (about 8%), patchouli<br />
(3.5%) <strong>and</strong> fennel, star anise, caraway seed, <strong>and</strong> cumin seed (1–9%). Much lower oil yields are<br />
obtained with juniper berries, where 75 kg <strong>of</strong> berries are required to produce 1 kg <strong>of</strong> oil, sage (about<br />
0.15%), <strong>and</strong> other leaf oils such as geranium (also about 0.15%). 700 kg <strong>of</strong> rose petals will yield 1 kg<br />
<strong>of</strong> oil <strong>and</strong> 1000 kg <strong>of</strong> bitter orange flowers are required for the production <strong>of</strong> also just 1 kg <strong>of</strong> oil.<br />
The yields <strong>of</strong> expressed fruit peel oils, such as bergamot, orange, <strong>and</strong> lemon vary from 0.2% to<br />
about 0.5%.<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> important agronomic factors have to be considered before embarking on the production<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils, such as climate, soil type, influence <strong>of</strong> drought <strong>and</strong> water stress <strong>and</strong> stresses<br />
caused by insects <strong>and</strong> microorganisms, propagation (seed or clones), <strong>and</strong> cultivation practices. Other<br />
important factors include precise knowledge on which part <strong>of</strong> the biomass is to be used, location <strong>of</strong><br />
the oil cells within the plant, timing <strong>of</strong> harvest, method <strong>of</strong> harvesting, storage, <strong>and</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong><br />
the biomass prior to essential oil extraction.<br />
4.1.4 CLIMATE<br />
The most important variables include temperature, number <strong>of</strong> hours <strong>of</strong> sunshine, <strong>and</strong> frequency <strong>and</strong><br />
magnitude <strong>of</strong> precipitations. Temperature has a pr<strong>of</strong>ound effect on the yield <strong>and</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> the essential<br />
oils, as the following example <strong>of</strong> lavender will show. The last years in the Provence, too cold at<br />
the beginning <strong>of</strong> growth, were followed by very hot weather <strong>and</strong> a lack <strong>of</strong> water. As a result yields<br />
decreased by one-third. The relationship between temperature <strong>and</strong> humidity is an additional important<br />
parameter. Humidity coupled with elevated temperatures produces conditions favorable to the<br />
proliferation <strong>of</strong> insect parasites <strong>and</strong>, most importantly, microorganisms. This sometimes causes<br />
plants to increase the production <strong>of</strong> essential oil for their own protection. Letchamo have studied the<br />
relationship between temperature <strong>and</strong> concentration <strong>of</strong> daylight on the yield <strong>of</strong> essential oil <strong>and</strong><br />
found that the quality <strong>of</strong> the oil was not influenced (Letchamo et al., 1994). Herbs <strong>and</strong> spices usually<br />
require greater amounts <strong>of</strong> sunlight. The duration <strong>of</strong> sunshine in the main areas <strong>of</strong> herb <strong>and</strong> spice
90 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
cultivation, such as the regions bordering the Mediterranean Sea, usually exceeds 8 h/day. In India,<br />
Indonesia <strong>and</strong> many parts <strong>of</strong> China this is well in excess <strong>of</strong> this figure <strong>and</strong> two or even three crops<br />
per year can be achieved. Protection against cooling <strong>and</strong> heavy winds may be required. Windbreaks<br />
provided by rows <strong>of</strong> trees or bushes <strong>and</strong> even stone walls are particularly common in southern<br />
Europe. In China the Litsea cubeba tree is used for the same purpose. In colder countries, the winter<br />
snow cover will protect perennials from frost damage. Short periods <strong>of</strong> frost with temperatures<br />
below −10°C will not be too detrimental to plant survival. However, long exposure to heavy frost at<br />
very low subzero temperatures will result in permanent damage to the plant ensuing from a lack <strong>of</strong><br />
water supply.<br />
4.1.5 SOIL QUALITY AND SOIL PREPARATION<br />
Every friend <strong>of</strong> a good wine is aware <strong>of</strong> the influence <strong>of</strong> the soil on the grapes <strong>and</strong> finally on the<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> the wine. The same applies to essential oil-bearing plants. Some crops, such as lavender,<br />
thyme, oregano, <strong>and</strong> clary sage require meager but lime-rich soils. The Jura Chalk <strong>of</strong> the Haute<br />
Provence is destined to produce a good growth <strong>of</strong> lavender <strong>and</strong> is the very reason for the good quality<br />
<strong>and</strong> interesting top note <strong>of</strong> its oils by comparison with lavender oils <strong>of</strong> Bulgarian origin growing<br />
on different soil types (Meunier, 1985). Soil pH affects significantly oil yield <strong>and</strong> oil quality.<br />
Figueiredo et al. found that the pH value “strongly influences the solubility <strong>of</strong> certain elements in<br />
the soil. Iron, zinc, copper <strong>and</strong> manganese are less soluble in alkaline than in acidic soils because<br />
they precipitate as hydroxides at high pH values” (Figueiredo et al., 2005). It is essential that farmers<br />
determine the limits <strong>of</strong> the elemental pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the soil. Furthermore, the spacing <strong>of</strong> plantings<br />
should ensure adequate supply with essential trace elements <strong>and</strong> nutrients. Selection <strong>of</strong> the optimum<br />
site coupled with a suitable climate plays an important role as they will provide a guarantee for<br />
optimum crop <strong>and</strong> essential oil quality.<br />
4.1.6 WATER STRESS AND DROUGHT<br />
It is well known to every gardener that lack <strong>of</strong> water, as well as too much water, can influence the<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> plants <strong>and</strong> even kill them. The tolerance <strong>of</strong> the biomass to soil moisture should be determined<br />
in order to identify the most appropriate site for the growing <strong>of</strong> the desired plant. Since fungal<br />
growth is caused by excess water, most plants require well-drained soils to prevent their roots<br />
from rotting <strong>and</strong> the plant from being damaged, thus adversely affecting essential oil production.<br />
Lack <strong>of</strong> water, for example, dryness, exerts a similar deleterious influence. Flowers are smaller than<br />
normal <strong>and</strong> yields drop. Extreme drought can kill the whole plant as its foliage dries closing down<br />
its entire metabolism.<br />
4.1.7 INSECT STRESS AND MICROORGANISMS<br />
Plants are living organisms capable <strong>of</strong> interacting with neighbor plants <strong>and</strong> warning them <strong>of</strong> any<br />
incipient danger from insect attack. These warning signals are the result <strong>of</strong> rapid changes occurring<br />
in their essential oil composition, which are then transferred to their neighbors who in turn transmit<br />
this information on to their neighbors forcing them to change their oil composition as well. In this<br />
way, the insect will come into contact with a chemically modified plant material, which may not suit<br />
its feeding habits thus obliging it to leave <strong>and</strong> look elsewhere. Microorganisms can also significantly<br />
change the essential oil composition as shown in the case <strong>of</strong> elderflower fragrance. Headspace gas<br />
chromatography coupled with mass spectroscopy (GC/MS) has shown that linalool, the main<br />
constituent <strong>of</strong> elderflowers, was transformed by a fungus present in the leaves, into linalool oxide.<br />
The larvae <strong>of</strong> Cécidomye (Thomasissiana lav<strong>and</strong>ula) damage the lavender plant with a concomitant<br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> oil quality. Mycoplasmose <strong>and</strong> the fungus Armillaria mellex can affect the whole plantation<br />
<strong>and</strong> totally spoil the quality <strong>of</strong> the oil.
Production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 91<br />
4.1.8 LOCATION OF OIL CELLS<br />
As already mentioned, the cells containing essential oils can be situated in various parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
plant. Two different types <strong>of</strong> essential oil cells are known, superficial cells, for example, gl<strong>and</strong>ular<br />
hairs located on the surface <strong>of</strong> the plant, common in many herbs such as oregano, mint, lavender,<br />
<strong>and</strong> so on, <strong>and</strong> cells embedded in plant tissue, occurring as isolated cells containing the secretions<br />
(as in citrus fruit <strong>and</strong> eucalyptus leaves), or as layers <strong>of</strong> cells surrounding intercellular space (canals<br />
or secretory cavities), for example, resin canals <strong>of</strong> pine. Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Dr. Johannes Novak (Institute <strong>of</strong><br />
Applied Botany, Veterinary University, Vienna) has shown impressive pictures <strong>and</strong> pointed out that<br />
the chemical composition <strong>of</strong> essential oils contained in neighboring cells (oil gl<strong>and</strong>s) could be variable<br />
but that the typical composition <strong>of</strong> a particular essential oil was largely due to the averaging <strong>of</strong><br />
the enormous number <strong>of</strong> individual cells present in the plant (Novak, 2005). It has been noted in a<br />
publication entitled “Physiological Aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Production” that individual oil gl<strong>and</strong>s<br />
do not always secrete the same type <strong>of</strong> compound <strong>and</strong> that the process <strong>of</strong> secretion can be different<br />
(Kamatou et al., 2006). Different approaches to distillation are dictated by the location <strong>of</strong> the oil<br />
gl<strong>and</strong>s. Preparation <strong>of</strong> the biomass to be distilled, temperature, <strong>and</strong> steam pressure affect the quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> the oil produced.<br />
4.1.9 TYPES OF BIOMASS USED<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils can occur in many different parts <strong>of</strong> the plant. They can be present in flowers (rose,<br />
lavender, magnolia, bitter orange, <strong>and</strong> blue chamomile) <strong>and</strong> leaves (cinnamon, patchouli, petitgrain,<br />
clove, perilla, <strong>and</strong> laurel); sometimes the whole aerial part <strong>of</strong> the plant is distilled (Melissa <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis,<br />
basil, thyme, rosemary, marjoram, verbena, <strong>and</strong> peppermint). The so-called fruit oils are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
extracted from seed, which forms part <strong>of</strong> the fruit, such as caraway, cori<strong>and</strong>er, cardamom, pepper,<br />
dill, <strong>and</strong> pimento. Citrus oils are extracted from the epicarp <strong>of</strong> species <strong>of</strong> Citrus, such as lemon,<br />
lime, bergamot, grapefruit, bitter orange as well as sweet orange, m<strong>and</strong>arine, clementine, <strong>and</strong> tangerine.<br />
Fruit or perhaps more correctly berry oils are obtained from juniper <strong>and</strong> Schinus species.<br />
The well-known bark oils are obtained from birch, cascarilla, cassia, cinnamon, <strong>and</strong> massoia. Oil<br />
<strong>of</strong> mace is obtained from the aril, a fleshy cover <strong>of</strong> the seed <strong>of</strong> nutmeg (Myristica fragrans). Flower<br />
buds are used for the production <strong>of</strong> clove oil. Wood <strong>and</strong> bark exudations yield an important group<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils such as galbanum, incense, myrrh, mastix, <strong>and</strong> storax, to name but a few. The<br />
needles <strong>of</strong> conifers (leaves) are a source <strong>of</strong> an important group <strong>of</strong> essential oils derived from species<br />
<strong>of</strong> Abies, Pinus, <strong>and</strong> so on. Wood oils are derived mostly from species <strong>of</strong> Santalum (s<strong>and</strong>alwood),<br />
cedar, amyris, cade, rosewood, agarwood, <strong>and</strong> guaiac. Finally, roots <strong>and</strong> rhizomes are the source <strong>of</strong><br />
oils <strong>of</strong> orris, valerian, calamus, <strong>and</strong> angelica.<br />
What happens when the plant is cut? Does it immediately start to die as happens in animals <strong>and</strong><br />
humans? The water content <strong>of</strong> a plant ranges from 50% to over 80%. The cutting <strong>of</strong> a plant interrupts<br />
its supply <strong>of</strong> water <strong>and</strong> minerals. Its life-sustaining processes slow down <strong>and</strong> finally stop<br />
altogether. The production <strong>of</strong> enzymes stops, auto-oxidative processes start, including an increase<br />
in bacterial activity leading to rotting <strong>and</strong> molding. Color <strong>and</strong> organoleptic properties, such as fragrance,<br />
will also change usually to their detriment. As a consequence <strong>of</strong> this, unless controlled<br />
drying or preparation is acceptable options, treatment <strong>of</strong> the biomass has to be prompt.<br />
4.1.10 TIMING OF THE HARVEST<br />
The timing <strong>of</strong> the harvest <strong>of</strong> the herbal crop is one <strong>of</strong> the most important factors affecting the quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> the essential oil. It is a well-documented fact that the chemical composition changes throughout<br />
the life <strong>of</strong> the plant. Occasionally, it can be a matter <strong>of</strong> days during which the quality <strong>of</strong> the<br />
essential oil reaches its optimum. Knowledge <strong>of</strong> the precise time <strong>of</strong> the onset <strong>of</strong> flowering <strong>of</strong>ten has<br />
a great influence on the composition <strong>of</strong> the oil. The chemical changes occurring during the entire
92 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
life cycle <strong>of</strong> Vietnamese Artemisia vulgaris have shown that 1,8-cineole <strong>and</strong> b-pinene contents before<br />
flowering were below 10% <strong>and</strong> 1.2%, respectively, whereas at the end <strong>of</strong> flowering they reached<br />
values above 24% <strong>and</strong> 10.4% (Nguyen Thi Phuong Thao et al., 2004). These are very large variations<br />
indeed occurring during the plant’s short life span. In the case <strong>of</strong> the lavender life cycle, the ester<br />
value <strong>of</strong> the oil is the quality-determining factor. It varies within a wide range <strong>and</strong> influences the<br />
value <strong>of</strong> the oil. As a rule <strong>of</strong> thumb, it is held that its maximum value is reached at a time when about<br />
two-third <strong>of</strong> the lavender flowers have opened <strong>and</strong> thus, that harvesting should commence. In the<br />
past, growers knew exactly when to harvest the biomass. These days the use <strong>of</strong> a combination <strong>of</strong><br />
microdistillation <strong>and</strong> gas chromatography (GC) techniques enables rapid testing <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> the<br />
oil <strong>and</strong> thus the determination <strong>of</strong> the optimum time for harvesting to start. Oil yields may in some<br />
cases be influenced by the time <strong>of</strong> harvesting. One <strong>of</strong> the best examples is rose oil. The petals should<br />
be collected in the morning between 6 a.m. <strong>and</strong> 9 a.m. With rising day temperatures the oil yield will<br />
diminish. In the case <strong>of</strong> oil gl<strong>and</strong>s embedded within the leaf structure, such as in the case <strong>of</strong> eucalypts<br />
<strong>and</strong> pines, oil yield <strong>and</strong> oil quality are largely unaffected by the time <strong>of</strong> harvesting.<br />
4.1.11 AGRICULTURAL CROP ESTABLISHMENT<br />
The first step is, in most cases, selection <strong>of</strong> plant seed which suits best the requirements <strong>of</strong> the product<br />
looked for. Preparation <strong>of</strong> seedbeds, growing from seed, growing <strong>and</strong> transplanting <strong>of</strong> seedlings,<br />
<strong>and</strong> so on should follow well-established agricultural practices. The spacing <strong>of</strong> rows has to be considered<br />
(Dey, 2007). For example, dill prefers wider row spacing than anise, cori<strong>and</strong>er, or caraway<br />
(Novak, 2005). The time required before a crop can be obtained depends on the species used <strong>and</strong><br />
can be very variable. Citronella <strong>and</strong> lemongrass may take 7–9 months from the time <strong>of</strong> planting<br />
before the first crop can be harvested while lavender <strong>and</strong> lav<strong>and</strong>in require up to three years. The<br />
most economical way to extract an essential oil is to transport the harvested biomass directly to the<br />
distillery. For some plants, this is the only practical option. Melissa <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis (“lemon balm”) is<br />
very prone to drying out <strong>and</strong> thus to loss <strong>of</strong> oil yield. Some harvested plant material may require<br />
special treatment <strong>of</strong> the biomass before oil extraction, for example, grinding or chipping, breaking<br />
or cutting up into smaller fragments, <strong>and</strong> sometimes just drying. In some cases, fermentation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
biomass should precede oil extraction. Water contained within the plant material has been classified<br />
by Yanive <strong>and</strong> Palevitch as chemically, physicochemically, <strong>and</strong> mechanically bound water (Yanive<br />
<strong>and</strong> Palevitch, 1982). According to these authors only the mechanically bound water, which is<br />
located on the surface <strong>and</strong> the capillaries <strong>of</strong> plants, can be reduced. Drying can be achieved simply<br />
by spreading the biomass on the ground where wind movement effects the drying process. Drying<br />
can also be carried out by the use <strong>of</strong> appropriate drying equipment. Drying, too, can affect the quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> the essential oil. Until the middle <strong>of</strong> the 1980s cut lavender <strong>and</strong> lav<strong>and</strong>in have been dried in<br />
the field, (Figure 4.3) a process requiring about three days. The resulting oils exhibited the typical<br />
fine, floral odor; however, oil yields were inferior to yields obtained with fresh material. Compared<br />
with the present day procedure with container harvesting <strong>and</strong> immediate processing (the so-called<br />
“vert-broyé”) this quality <strong>of</strong> the oil is greener, harsher, <strong>and</strong> requires some time to harmonize.<br />
However, yields are better, <strong>and</strong> one step in the production process has been eliminated. Clary sage<br />
is a good example demonstrating the difference between oils distilled from fresh plant material on<br />
the one h<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> dried plant material on the other. The chemical differences are clearly shown in<br />
Table 4.2. Apart from herbal biomass, fruits <strong>and</strong> seed may also have to be dried before distillation.<br />
These include pepper, cori<strong>and</strong>er, cloves, <strong>and</strong> pimento berries, as well as certain roots such as vetiver,<br />
calamus, lovage, <strong>and</strong> orris. Clary sage is harvested at the beginning <strong>of</strong> summer but distilled only at<br />
the end <strong>of</strong> the harvesting season.<br />
Seeds <strong>and</strong> fruits <strong>of</strong> the families Apiaceae, Piperaceae, <strong>and</strong> Myristicaceae usually require grinding<br />
up prior to steam distillation. In many cases, the seed has to be dried before comminution takes<br />
place. Celery, cori<strong>and</strong>er, dill, ambrette, fennel, <strong>and</strong> anise belong to the Apiaceae. All varieties <strong>of</strong><br />
pepper belong to the Piperaceae while nutmeg belongs to the Myristicaceae. The finer the material
Production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 93<br />
FIGURE 4.3 (See color insert following page 468.) Lavender drying on the field.<br />
is ground, the better will be the oil yield <strong>and</strong>, owing to shorter distillation times, also the quality <strong>of</strong><br />
the oil. In order to reduce losses <strong>of</strong> volatiles by evaporation during the comminution <strong>of</strong> the seed or<br />
fruit, the grinding can also be carried out under water, preferably in a closed apparatus. Heartwood<br />
samples, such as those <strong>of</strong> Santalum album, Santalum spicatum, <strong>and</strong> Santalum austrocaledonicum<br />
TABLE 4.2<br />
Differences in the Composition <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Essential</strong> Oil <strong>of</strong> Clary Sage<br />
Manufactured Fresh <strong>and</strong> Dried<br />
Component “Vert Broyee” (%) Traditional (%)<br />
Myrcene 0.9–1.0 0.9–1.1<br />
Limonene 0.2–0.4 0.3–0.5<br />
Ocimene cis 0.3–0.5 0.4–0.6<br />
Ocimene trans 0.5–0.7 0.8–1.0<br />
Copaene alpha 0.5–0.7 1.4–1.6<br />
Linalool 13.0–24.0 6.5–13.5<br />
Linalyl acetate 56.0–70.5 62.0–78.0<br />
Caryophyllene beta 1.5–1.8 2.5–3.0<br />
Terpineol alpha 1.0–5.0 Max. 2.1<br />
Neryl acetate 0.6–0.8 0.7–1.0<br />
Germacrene d 1.1–7.5 1.5–12<br />
Geranyl acetate 1.4–1.7 2.2–2.5<br />
Geraniol 1.4–1.7 1.2–1.5<br />
Sclareol 0.4–1.8 0.6–2.8<br />
Minor changes<br />
Middle changes<br />
Big changes
94 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
have to be reduced to a very fine powder prior to steam distillation in order to achieve complete<br />
recovery <strong>of</strong> the essential oil. In some cases, coarse chipping <strong>of</strong> the wood is adequate for efficient<br />
essential oil extraction. This includes cedarwood, amyris, rosewood, birch, guaiac, linaloe, cade,<br />
cabreuva, <strong>and</strong> the like.<br />
Plant material containing small branches as well as foliage, which includes pine needles, has to<br />
be coarsely chopped up prior to steam distillation. Examples <strong>of</strong> such material are juniper branches,<br />
Melaleuca alternifolia, Corymbia citriodora, Pinus mugo, Pinus pinaster, Pinus sylvestris, Pinus<br />
nigra, Abies alba, Abies sibirica, <strong>and</strong> Abies gr<strong>and</strong>is, as well as mint <strong>and</strong> peppermint. Present day<br />
mechanized harvesting methods automatically effect the chopping up <strong>of</strong> the biomass. This also<br />
reduces the volume <strong>of</strong> the biomass, thus increasing the quantity <strong>of</strong> material that can be packed into<br />
the still <strong>and</strong> making the process more economical.<br />
It appears that the time when the seed is sown influences both oil yield as well as essential oil<br />
composition, for example, whether it is sown in spring or autumn. Important factors affecting production<br />
<strong>of</strong> plant material are application <strong>of</strong> fertilizers, herbicides, <strong>and</strong> pesticides as well as the availability<br />
<strong>and</strong> kind <strong>of</strong> pollination agents. In many essential oil producing countries, no artificial<br />
nitrogen, potassium, or phosphorus fertilizers are used. Instead, both in Europe, as well as overseas,<br />
the biomass left over after steam distillation is spread in the fields as an organic fertilizer. Court<br />
et al. reported, from the field tests conducted with peppermint, that an increase in fertilizer affects<br />
plant oil yield. However, higher doses did not result in further increases in oil yield or in changes in<br />
the oil composition (Court et al., 1993). Herbicides <strong>and</strong> pesticides do not appear to influence either<br />
oil yield or oil composition. The accumulation <strong>of</strong> pesticide residues in essential oils has a negative<br />
influence on their quality <strong>and</strong> on their uses. The yield <strong>and</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> essential oils are also influenced<br />
by the timing <strong>and</strong> type <strong>of</strong> pollinating agent. If the flower is ready for pollination the intensity<br />
<strong>of</strong> its fragrance <strong>and</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> volatiles present are at their maximum. If on the other h<strong>and</strong> the<br />
weather is too cold at the time <strong>of</strong> flowering, pollination will be adversely affected <strong>and</strong> transformation<br />
to fruit is unlikely to take place. Such an occurrence has a very significant effect on the plant’s<br />
metabolism <strong>and</strong> finally on its essential oil. Grapevine cultivators use the following trick to attract<br />
pollinators to their vines. A rose flower placed at the end <strong>of</strong> each grapevine row attracts pollinators<br />
who then also pollinate the unattractive flowers <strong>of</strong> the grapevine.<br />
4.1.12 PROPAGATION FROM SEED AND CLONES<br />
Plants can be grown from seed or propagated asexually by cloning. Lavender plants raised from seed<br />
are kept for one year in pots before transplanting into the field. It then takes another three years before<br />
the plantation yields enough flowers for commercial harvesting <strong>and</strong> steam distillation. Plants <strong>of</strong> any<br />
species raised from seed will exhibit wide genetic variations among the progeny, as exist between the<br />
members <strong>of</strong> any species propagated by sexual means, for example, humans. In the case <strong>of</strong> lavender<br />
(Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia), the composition <strong>of</strong> the essential oil from individual plants varies from plant<br />
to plant or more precisely, from one genotype to the another. Improvement <strong>of</strong> the crop by selective<br />
breeding <strong>of</strong> those genotypes that yield the most desirable oil is a very slow process requiring years to<br />
accomplish. Charles Denny, who initiated the Tasmanian lavender industry in 1921, selected within<br />
11 years 487 genotypes from a source <strong>of</strong> 2500 genotypes <strong>of</strong> L. angustifolia for closer examination,<br />
narrowing them down to just 13 strains exhibiting large yields <strong>of</strong> superior oil. Finally, four <strong>of</strong> these<br />
genotypes were grown on a large scale <strong>and</strong> mixed together in what is called “comunelles.” The quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> the oils produced was fairly constant from year to year, both in their physicochemical properties as<br />
well as in their olfactory characteristics (Denny, 1995, private information to the author).<br />
Cloning is the preferred method for the replication <strong>of</strong> plants having particular, usually commercially<br />
desirable, characteristics. Clones are obtained from buds or cuttings <strong>of</strong> the same individual<br />
<strong>and</strong> the essential oils, for example, obtained from them are the same, or very similar to those <strong>of</strong> the<br />
parent. Cloning procedures are well established but may vary in their detail among different species.<br />
One important advantage <strong>of</strong> clones is that commercial harvesting may be possible after a shorter
Production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 95<br />
time as compared with plantations grown from seed. One risk does exist though. If the mother plant<br />
is diseased all clones will also be affected <strong>and</strong> the plantation would have to be destroyed.<br />
No field <strong>of</strong> agriculture requires such a detailed <strong>and</strong> comprehensive knowledge <strong>of</strong> botany <strong>and</strong> soil<br />
science, as well as <strong>of</strong> breeding <strong>and</strong> propagation methods, harvesting methods, <strong>and</strong> so on as that <strong>of</strong><br />
the cultivation <strong>of</strong> essential oil-bearing plants. The importance <strong>of</strong> this is evident from the very large<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> scientific research carried out in this field by universities as well as by industry.<br />
4.1.13 COMMERCIAL ESSENTIAL OIL EXTRACTION METHODS<br />
There are three methods in use. Expression is probably the oldest <strong>of</strong> these <strong>and</strong> is used almost exclusively<br />
for the production <strong>of</strong> Citrus oils. The second method, hydrodistillation or steam distillation,<br />
is the most commonly used one <strong>of</strong> the three methods, while dry distillation is used only rarely in<br />
some very special cases.<br />
4.1.14 EXPRESSION<br />
Cold expression, for example, expression at ambient temperature without the involvement <strong>of</strong> extraneous<br />
heat, was practiced long before humans discovered the process <strong>of</strong> distillation, probably because the<br />
necessary tools for it were readily available. Stones or wooden tools were well suited to breaking the oil<br />
cells <strong>and</strong> freeing their fragrant contents. This method was used almost exclusively for the production <strong>of</strong><br />
Citrus peel oils. Citrus <strong>and</strong> the allied genus Fortunella belong to the large family Rutaceae. Citrus fruits<br />
used for the production <strong>of</strong> the oils are shown in Table 4.3. Citrus fruit cultivation is widely spread all over<br />
the world with a suitable climate. <strong>Oils</strong> with the largest production include orange, lemon, grapefruit, <strong>and</strong><br />
m<strong>and</strong>arin. Taking world lemon production as an example, the most important lemon-growing areas in<br />
TABLE 4.3<br />
Important <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Production from Plants <strong>of</strong> the Rutaceae Family<br />
Botanical Term Expressed Distilled Used Plant Parts<br />
Citrus aurantifolia (Christm.)<br />
Swingle<br />
Citrus aurantium L., syn. Citrus<br />
amara Link, syn. Citrus bigaradia<br />
Loisel, syn. Citrus vulgaris Risso<br />
Citrus bergamia (Risso et Poit.),<br />
Citrus aurantium L. subsp.<br />
bergamia (Wight et Arnott) Engler<br />
Citrus hystrix DC., syn.<br />
Citrus torosa Blanco<br />
Lime oil Lime oil distilled Pericarp; fruit juice or<br />
crushed fruits<br />
Bitter orange oil<br />
Neroli oil, Bitter orange<br />
petitgrain oil<br />
Flower, pericarp, leaf, <strong>and</strong><br />
twigs with sometimes<br />
little green fruits<br />
Bergamot oil Bergamot petitgrain oil Pericarp, leaf, <strong>and</strong> twigs<br />
with sometimes little<br />
green fruits<br />
Kaffir lime oil, Kaffir leaves oil Pericarp, leaves<br />
Combava<br />
Citrus latifolia Tanaka Lime oil Persian type Pericarp<br />
Citrus limon (L.) Burm. f. Lemon oil Lemon petitgrain oil Flower, pericarp, leaf, <strong>and</strong><br />
twigs with sometimes<br />
little green fruits<br />
Citrus reticulate Blanco syn.<br />
Citrus nobilis Andrews<br />
Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck,<br />
Citrus djalonis A. Chevalier<br />
M<strong>and</strong>arin oil M<strong>and</strong>arin petitgrain oil Flower, pericarp, leaf, <strong>and</strong><br />
twigs with sometimes<br />
little green fruits<br />
Sweet orange oil<br />
Pericarp<br />
Citrus × paradisi Macfad. Grapefruit oil Pericarp
96 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Europe are situated in Italy <strong>and</strong> Spain with Cyprus <strong>and</strong> Greece being <strong>of</strong> much lesser importance. Nearly<br />
90% <strong>of</strong> all lemon fruit produced originates from Sicily where the exceptionally favorable climate enables<br />
an almost around the year production. There is a winter crop from September to April, a spring crop<br />
from February to May, <strong>and</strong> a summer crop from May to September. The Spanish harvest calendar is very<br />
similar. Other production areas in the northern hemisphere are in the United States, particularly in<br />
Florida, Arizona, <strong>and</strong> California, <strong>and</strong> in Mexico. In the southern hemisphere, large-scale lemon producers<br />
are Argentina, Uruguay, <strong>and</strong> Brazil. Lemon production is also being developed in South Africa,<br />
Ivory Coast, <strong>and</strong> Australia. China promises to become a huge producer <strong>of</strong> lemon in the future.<br />
The reason for extracting citrus oils from fruit peel using mechanical methods is the relative thermal<br />
instability <strong>of</strong> the aldehydes contained in them. Fatty, for example, aliphatic, aldehydes such as<br />
heptanal, octanal, nonanal, decanal, <strong>and</strong> dodecanal are readily oxidized by atmospheric oxygen,<br />
which gives rise to the formation <strong>of</strong> malodorous carboxylic acids. Likewise, terpenoid aldehydes such<br />
as neral, geranial, citronellal, <strong>and</strong> perilla aldehyde as well as the a- <strong>and</strong> b-sinensals are sensitive to<br />
oxidation. Hydrodistillation <strong>of</strong> citrus fruit yields poor quality oils owing to chemical reactions that can<br />
be attributed to heat <strong>and</strong> acid-initiated degradation <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the unstable fruit volatiles. Furthermore,<br />
some <strong>of</strong> the terpenic hydrocarbons <strong>and</strong> esters contained in the peel oils are also sensitive to heat <strong>and</strong><br />
oxygen. One exception to this does exist. Lime oil <strong>of</strong> commerce can be either cold pressed or steam<br />
distilled. The chemical composition <strong>of</strong> these two types <strong>of</strong> oil as well as their odors differs significantly<br />
from each other. The expressed citrus peel is normally treated with hot steam in order to recover any<br />
essential oil still left over in it. The products <strong>of</strong> this process, consisting mainly <strong>of</strong> limonene, are used<br />
in the solvent industry. The remaining peel <strong>and</strong> fruit flesh pulp is used as cattle feed.<br />
The oil cells <strong>of</strong> citrus fruit are situated just under the surface in the epicarp, also called flavedo,<br />
in the colored area <strong>of</strong> the fruit. Figure 4.4 is a cross section <strong>of</strong> the different parts <strong>of</strong> the fruit also<br />
showing the juice cells present in the fruit. An essential oil is also present in the juice cells. However,<br />
the amount <strong>of</strong> oil present in the juice cells is very much smaller than the amount present in the<br />
flavedo; also their composition differs from each other.<br />
Until the beginning <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century, industrial production <strong>of</strong> cold-pressed citrus oils was<br />
carried out manually. One has to visualize huge halls with hundreds <strong>of</strong> workers, men <strong>and</strong> women,<br />
seated on small chairs h<strong>and</strong>ling the fruit. First <strong>of</strong> all, the fruit had to be washed <strong>and</strong> cut into two<br />
halves. The pulp was then removed from the fruit using a sharp-edged spoon, called the “rastrello”<br />
<strong>and</strong> after the peel was soaked in warm water. The fruit peel was now manually turned inside out so<br />
that the epicarp was on the inside, squeezed by h<strong>and</strong> to break the oil gl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> the oil soaked up<br />
with a sponge. The peel was now turned inside out once again <strong>and</strong> wiped with the sponge <strong>and</strong> the<br />
FIGURE 4.4 (See color insert following page 468.) Parts <strong>of</strong> a citrus fruit.
Production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 97<br />
sponge squeezed into a terracotta bowl, the “concolina.” After decantation, the oil was collected in<br />
metal containers. This was an extremely laborious process characterized by substantial oil losses. A<br />
later improvement <strong>of</strong> the fruit peel expression process was the “scodella” method. The apparatus<br />
was a metallic hemisphere lined inside with small spikes, with a tube attached at its center. The fruit<br />
placed inside the hemisphere was rotated while being squeezed against the spikes thus breaking the<br />
oil cells. The oil emulsion, containing some <strong>of</strong> the wax coating the fruit, flowed into the central tube<br />
was collected, <strong>and</strong> the oil was subsequently separated by centrifugation.<br />
Neither <strong>of</strong> these methods, even when used simultaneously, was able to satisfy the increased<br />
dem<strong>and</strong> for fruit peel oils at the start <strong>of</strong> the industrial era. The quantity <strong>of</strong> fruit processed could be<br />
increased but the extraction methods were time wasting <strong>and</strong> the oil yields too low. With the advent<br />
<strong>of</strong> the twentieth century the first industrial machinery was developed. Today the only systems <strong>of</strong><br />
significance in use for the industrial production <strong>of</strong> peel oils can be classified into four categories:<br />
“sfumatrici” machines <strong>and</strong> “speciale sfumatrici,” “Pellatrici” machines, “FMC whole fruit process,”<br />
<strong>and</strong> “Brown oil extractors (BOEs)” (Arnodou, 1991).<br />
It is important to be aware <strong>of</strong> the fact that the individual oil gl<strong>and</strong>s within the epicarp are not<br />
connected to neighboring gl<strong>and</strong>s. The cell walls <strong>of</strong> these oil gl<strong>and</strong>s are very tough <strong>and</strong> it is believed<br />
that the oil they contain is either a metabolic waste product or a substance protecting the plant from<br />
being browsed by animals.<br />
The machines used in the “sfumatrici” methods consist in principle <strong>of</strong> two parts, a fixed part <strong>and</strong><br />
a moveable part. The fruit is cut into two <strong>and</strong> the flesh is removed. In order to extract the oil, the<br />
citrus peel is gently squeezed, by moving it around between the two parts <strong>of</strong> the device, <strong>and</strong> rinsing<br />
<strong>of</strong>f the squeezed-out oil with a jet <strong>of</strong> water. The oil readily separates from the liquid on st<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong><br />
is collected by decantation. Since the epicarp may contain organic acids (citric acid, etc.), it is occasionally<br />
soaked in lime solution in order to neutralize the acids present. Greater concentrations <strong>of</strong><br />
acid could alter the quality <strong>of</strong> the oil. Degradation <strong>of</strong> aldehydes is also an important consideration.<br />
In the “special sfumatrici” method, the peel is soaked in the lime solution for 24 h before pressing.<br />
By means <strong>of</strong> a metallic chain drawn by horizontal rollers with ribbed forms, the technical process<br />
is finished. The oils obtained by these methods may have to be “wintered,” for example, refrigerated<br />
in order to freeze out the peel waxes that are then filtered <strong>of</strong>f.<br />
In the “Pellatrici” method the peel oil is removed during the first step <strong>and</strong> the fruit juice in a<br />
second step (Figure 4.5). In the first step, the fruit is fed through a slowly turning Archimedean<br />
screw-type valve. The screw is covered with numerous spikes that will bruise the oil cells in the epicarp<br />
<strong>and</strong> initiate the flow <strong>of</strong> oil. The oil is, once again, removed by means <strong>of</strong> a jet <strong>of</strong> water. The fruit<br />
FIGURE 4.5 (See color insert following page 468.) “Pellatrici method.” The spiked Archimedes screw<br />
with lemons, washed with water.
98 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
FIGURE 4.6 (See color insert following page 468.) “Brown” process. A battery <strong>of</strong> eight juice squeezers<br />
waiting for fruits.<br />
is finally carried to a fast-rotating, spiked, roller carpet where the remaining oil cells, located deeper<br />
within the epicarp, are bruised <strong>and</strong> their oil content recovered, thus resulting in maximum oil yield.<br />
The process involves centrifugation, filtration, <strong>and</strong> “wintering” as previously mentioned.<br />
The “Brown process” (Reeve, 2005) is used mainly in the United States <strong>and</strong> in South America,<br />
but less in Europe. The BOE (Figure 4.6) is somewhat similar to the machinery <strong>of</strong> the “Pellatrici”<br />
method. A device at the front end controls the quantity <strong>of</strong> fruit entering the machine. The machine<br />
itself consists <strong>of</strong> numerous pairs <strong>of</strong> spiked rollers turning in the same direction, as well as moving<br />
horizontally, thus reaching all oil cells. The spiked rollers as well as the fruit are submerged in water<br />
for easy transport. Any residual water <strong>and</strong> oil adhering to the fruit are removed by a special system<br />
<strong>of</strong> rollers <strong>and</strong> added to the oil emulsion generated on the first set <strong>of</strong> rollers. Any solid particles are<br />
then removed by passing it through a fine sieve. The emulsion is then centrifuged <strong>and</strong> the aqueous<br />
phase recycled. The BOE is manufactured in V4A steel to avoid contact with iron.<br />
The most frequently used type <strong>of</strong> extractor is the food machinery corporation (FMC)-in-Line. It is<br />
assumed that in the United States more than 50% <strong>of</strong> extractors are <strong>of</strong> the FMC type (Figure 4.7).<br />
Other large producer countries, such as Brazil <strong>and</strong> Argentina use exclusively FMC extractors. The<br />
FIGURE 4.7 (See color insert following page 468.) FMC extractor.
Production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 99<br />
reason for this is the design <strong>of</strong> the machinery, as fruit juice <strong>and</strong> oil are produced in one step without<br />
the two coming into contact with each other. The process requires prior grading <strong>of</strong> the fruit as the cups<br />
used in this process are designed for different sizes <strong>of</strong> fruit. An optimum fruit size is important as<br />
bigger fruit would be over squeezed <strong>and</strong> some essential oil carried over into the juice making it bitter.<br />
On the other h<strong>and</strong> if the fruit were too small the yield <strong>of</strong> juice would be reduced. Different frame sizes<br />
allow treating 3, 5, or 8 fruits at the same time. This technique was revolutionary in its concept <strong>and</strong><br />
works as follows: the fruit is carried to, <strong>and</strong> placed into, a fixed cup. Another cup, bearing a mirror<br />
image relationship to the fixed cup, is positioned exactly above it. Both cups are built <strong>of</strong> intermeshing<br />
jaws. The moveable cup is lowered toward the fixed cup thus enclosing the fruit. At the same time, a<br />
circular knife cuts a hole into the bottom <strong>of</strong> the fruit. When pressure is applied to the fruit the expressed<br />
juice will exit through the cut hole on to a mesh screen <strong>and</strong> be transported to the juice manifold while<br />
at the same time the oil is squeezed out <strong>of</strong> the surface <strong>of</strong> the peel. As before the oil is collected using<br />
a jet <strong>of</strong> water. The oil–water emulsion is then separated by centrifugation.<br />
An examination <strong>of</strong> the developments in the design <strong>of</strong> citrus fruit processing machinery shows<br />
quite clearly that the quality <strong>of</strong> the juice was more important than the quality <strong>of</strong> the oil, the only<br />
exception being oil <strong>of</strong> bergamot. Nevertheless, oil quality improved during the last decades <strong>and</strong> complies<br />
with the requirements <strong>of</strong> ISO St<strong>and</strong>ards. The expressed pulp <strong>of</strong> the more valuable kind fruit is<br />
very <strong>of</strong>ten treated with high-pressure steam to recover additional amounts <strong>of</strong> colorless oils <strong>of</strong> variable<br />
composition. The kinds <strong>of</strong> fruit treated in this manner are bergamot, lemon, <strong>and</strong> m<strong>and</strong>arin.<br />
4.1.15 STEAM DISTILLATION<br />
Steam or water distillation is unquestionably the most frequently used method for the extraction <strong>of</strong><br />
essential oil from plants. The already earlier mentioned history <strong>of</strong> steam distillation <strong>and</strong> the longst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
interest <strong>of</strong> mankind in extracting the fragrant <strong>and</strong> useful volatile constituents <strong>of</strong> plants<br />
testify to this. Distillation plants <strong>of</strong> varying design abound all over the world. While in some developing<br />
countries traditional <strong>and</strong> sometimes rather primitive methods are still being used (Figure 4.8),<br />
the essential oils produced are <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>of</strong> high quality. Industrialized countries employ technologically<br />
more evolved <strong>and</strong> complex equipment, computer aided with in-process analysis <strong>of</strong> the final<br />
product. Both <strong>of</strong> these very different ways <strong>of</strong> commercial essential oil production provide excellent<br />
quality oils. One depends on skill <strong>and</strong> experience, the other on superior technology <strong>and</strong> expensive<br />
equipment. It should be borne in mind that advice by an expert on distillation is a prerequisite for<br />
the production <strong>of</strong> superior quality oils. The term “distillation” is derived from the Latin “distillare”<br />
which means “trickling down.” In its simplest form distillation is defined as “evaporation <strong>and</strong> subsequent<br />
condensation <strong>of</strong> a liquid.” All liquids evaporate to a greater or lesser degree, even at room<br />
temperature. This is due to thermally induced molecular movements within the liquid resulting in<br />
some <strong>of</strong> the molecules being ejected into the airspace above them (diffusing into the air). As the<br />
temperature is increased these movements increase as well, resulting in more molecules being<br />
ejected, for example, in increased evaporation. The definition <strong>of</strong> an essential oil, ISO 9235, item<br />
3.1.1 is: “… product obtained from vegetable raw material—either by distillation with water or<br />
steam” <strong>and</strong> in item 3.1.2: “… obtained with or without added water in the still” (ISO/DIS 9235.2,<br />
1997, p. 2). This means that even “cooking” in the presence <strong>of</strong> water represents a method suitable<br />
for the production <strong>of</strong> essential oils. The release <strong>of</strong> the essential oil present in the oil gl<strong>and</strong>s (cells)<br />
<strong>of</strong> a plant is due to the bursting <strong>of</strong> the oil cell walls caused by the increased pressure <strong>of</strong> the heatinduced<br />
expansion <strong>of</strong> the oil cell contents. The steam flow acts as the carrier <strong>of</strong> the essential oil<br />
molecules. The basic principle <strong>of</strong> either water or steam distillation is a limit value <strong>of</strong> a liquid–<br />
liquid–vapor system. The theory <strong>of</strong> hydrodistillation is the following. Two nonmiscible liquids (in<br />
our case water <strong>and</strong> essential oil) A <strong>and</strong> B form two separate phases. The total vapor pressure <strong>of</strong> that<br />
system is equal to the sum <strong>of</strong> the partial vapor pressures <strong>of</strong> the two pure liquids:<br />
r = r A + r B (r is the total vapor pressure <strong>of</strong> the system).
100 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
FIGURE 4.8 Bush distillation device, opened.<br />
With complete nonmiscibility <strong>of</strong> both liquids, r is independent <strong>of</strong> the composition <strong>of</strong> the liquid<br />
phase. The boiling temperature <strong>of</strong> the mixture (T M ) lies below the boiling temperatures (T A <strong>and</strong> T B )<br />
<strong>of</strong> liquids A <strong>and</strong> B. The proportionality between the quantity <strong>of</strong> each component <strong>and</strong> the pressure in<br />
the vapor phase is given in the formula<br />
N<br />
N<br />
oil<br />
water<br />
P<br />
=<br />
P<br />
oil<br />
water<br />
where N oil st<strong>and</strong>s for the number <strong>of</strong> moles <strong>of</strong> the oil in the vapor phase <strong>and</strong> N water the number <strong>of</strong><br />
moles <strong>of</strong> water in the vapor phase. It is nearly impossible to calculate the proportions as an essential<br />
oil is a multicomponent mixture <strong>of</strong> variable composition.<br />
The simplest method <strong>of</strong> essential oil extraction is by means <strong>of</strong> hydrodistillation, for example, by<br />
immersion <strong>of</strong> the biomass in boiling water. The plant material soaks up water during the boiling<br />
process <strong>and</strong> the oil contained in the oil cells diffuses through the cell walls by means <strong>of</strong> osmosis.<br />
Once the oil has diffused out <strong>of</strong> the oil cells, it is vaporized <strong>and</strong> carried away by the stream <strong>of</strong><br />
steam. The volatility <strong>of</strong> the oil constituents is not influenced by the rate <strong>of</strong> vaporization but does<br />
depend on the degree <strong>of</strong> their solubility in water. As a result, the more water-soluble essential components<br />
will distil over before the more volatile but less water-soluble ones. The usefulness <strong>of</strong><br />
hydrodiffusion can be demonstrated by reference to rose oil. It is well known that occasionally<br />
some <strong>of</strong> the essential oil constituents are not present as such in the plant but are artifacts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
extraction process. They can be products <strong>of</strong> either enzymic splitting or chemical degradation,<br />
occurring during the steam distillation, <strong>of</strong> high-molecular-weight <strong>and</strong> thus nonvolatile compounds<br />
present in the plants. These compounds are <strong>of</strong>ten glycosides. The main constituents <strong>of</strong> rose oil,<br />
citronellol, geraniol, <strong>and</strong> nerol are products <strong>of</strong> a fermentation that takes place during the waterdistillation<br />
process.
Production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 101<br />
Hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> esters to alcohols <strong>and</strong> acids can occur during steam distillation. This can have<br />
serious implications in the case <strong>of</strong> ester-rich oils <strong>and</strong> special precautions have to be taken to prevent<br />
or at least to limit the extent <strong>of</strong> ester degradation. The most important examples <strong>of</strong> this are<br />
lavender or lav<strong>and</strong>in oils rich in linalyl acetate <strong>and</strong> cardamom oil rich in a-terpinyl acetate.<br />
Chamazulene, a blue bicyclic sesquiterpene, present in the steam-distilled oil <strong>of</strong> German chamomile,<br />
Chamomilla recutita (L.) Rauschert, flower heads is an artifact resulting from matricin by a<br />
complex series <strong>of</strong> chemical reactions: dehydrogenation, dehydration, <strong>and</strong> ester hydrolysis. As<br />
chamazulene is not a particularly stable compound, the deep blue color <strong>of</strong> the oil can change to<br />
green <strong>and</strong> even yellow on aging.<br />
The design <strong>of</strong> a water/steam distillation plant at its simplest, sometimes called “false bottom<br />
apparatus,” is as follows: a still pot (a mild steel drum or similar vessel) is fitted with a perforated<br />
metal plate or grate, fixed above the intended level <strong>of</strong> the water, <strong>and</strong> a lid with a goose neck outlet.<br />
The lid has to be equipped with a gasket or a water seal to prevent steam leaks. The steam outlet is<br />
attached to a condenser, for example, a serpentine placed in a drum containing cold water. An oil<br />
collector (Florentine flask) placed at the bottom end <strong>of</strong> the serpentine separates the oil from the<br />
distilled water (Figure 4.9). The whole assembly is fixed on a brick fireplace. A separate water inlet<br />
is <strong>of</strong>ten provided to compensate for water used up during the process. The biomass is placed inside<br />
the still pot above the perforated metal plate <strong>and</strong> sufficient biomass should be used to completely fill<br />
the still pot. The fuel used is firewood. This kind <strong>of</strong> distillation plant was extensively used at the end<br />
<strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century, mainly for field distillations. A disadvantage <strong>of</strong> this system was that in<br />
some cases excessive heat imparted a burnt smell to the oils. Furthermore, when the water level in<br />
the still dropped too much the, plant material could get scorched. Till today there is a necessity to<br />
clean the distillation vessel after two cycles with water to avoid burning notes in the essential oil. In<br />
any case, the quality <strong>of</strong> oils obtained in this type <strong>of</strong> apparatus was very variable <strong>and</strong> varied with<br />
each distillation. A huge improvement to this process was the introduction <strong>of</strong> steam generated externally.<br />
The early steam generators were very large <strong>and</strong> unwieldy <strong>and</strong> the distillation plant could no<br />
longer be transported in the field. The biomass had now to be transported to the distillation plant,<br />
unlike with the original type <strong>of</strong> distillation plant. Originally, the generator was fuelled with dry,<br />
FIGURE 4.9 Old distillation apparatus modernized by electric heating.
102 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
extracted biomass. Today gas or fuel oil is used. The delivery <strong>of</strong> steam can be carried out in various<br />
ways. Most commonly, the steam is led directly into the still through its bottom. Overheating is thus<br />
avoided <strong>and</strong> the biomass is heated rapidly. It also allows regulation <strong>of</strong> steam quantity <strong>and</strong> pressure<br />
<strong>and</strong> reduces distillation time <strong>and</strong> improves oil quality. In another method, the steam is injected in a<br />
spiraling motion. This method is more effective as the steam comes into contact with a greater surface<br />
<strong>of</strong> the biomass. The velocity <strong>of</strong> steam throughput <strong>and</strong> the duration <strong>of</strong> the distillation depend on<br />
the nature <strong>of</strong> the biomass. It can vary from 100 kg/h in the case <strong>of</strong> seed <strong>and</strong> fruits to 400 kg/h for<br />
clary sage. The duration <strong>of</strong> the distillation can vary from about 20 min for Lavender flowers (Denny,<br />
1995, personal communication) to 700 min for dried Angelica root. The values quoted are for a 4 m 3<br />
still pot (Omigbaigi, 2005). Specialists on distillation found as formula that distillation can be<br />
stopped when the ratio <strong>of</strong> oil to water coming from condenser will achieve 1:40. In all cases <strong>of</strong><br />
hydrodistillation, the distillation water is recovered <strong>and</strong> reused for steam generation. In a cohobation,<br />
the aqueous phase <strong>of</strong> the distillate is continuously reintroduced into the still pot. In this<br />
method, any essential oil constituents emulsified or dissolved in the water are captured, thus increasing<br />
total oil yield. There is one important exception: In the case <strong>of</strong> rose oil the distillation water is<br />
collected <strong>and</strong> redistilled separately in a second step. The “floral water” contains increased amounts<br />
<strong>of</strong> b-phenylethyl alcohol, up to 15%, whereas its maximum permissible content in rose oil is 3%.<br />
The reason for this is its significant solubility in water, ca. 2%.<br />
The distillation <strong>of</strong> rose oil is an art in itself as not only quality but quantity as well play an important<br />
role. It takes two distillation cycles to produce between 200 <strong>and</strong> 280 g <strong>of</strong> rose oil. Jean-François Arnodou<br />
describes its manufacture as follows (Arnodou, 1991): The still pot is loaded with 400 kg <strong>of</strong> rose petals<br />
<strong>and</strong> 1600 L <strong>of</strong> water. The contents are heated until they boil <strong>and</strong> steam-distilled. Approximately, the<br />
quantity <strong>of</strong> flowers used is then distilled. That action will last about 2–3 h. Specially designed condensers<br />
are required in order to obtain a good quality. The condensing system comprises a tubular condenser<br />
followed by a second cooler to allow the oil to separate. The oil is collected in Florentine-type oil separators.<br />
About 300 L <strong>of</strong> the oil-saturated still waters are then redistilled in a separate still in order to<br />
recover most <strong>of</strong> the oil contained in them. Both oils are mixed together <strong>and</strong> constitute the rose oil <strong>of</strong><br />
commerce. BIOLANDES described in 1991 the whole process, which uses a microprocessor to manage<br />
parameters such as pressure <strong>and</strong> temperature, regulated by servo-controlled pneumatic valves.<br />
A modern distillation plant consists <strong>of</strong> the biomass container (still pot), a cooling system (condenser),<br />
an oil separator, <strong>and</strong> a high-capacity steam generator. The kettle (still pot) looks like a cylindrical<br />
vertical storage tank with steam pipes located at the bottom <strong>of</strong> the still. Perforated sieve-like<br />
plates are <strong>of</strong>ten used to separate the plant charge <strong>and</strong> prevent compaction, thus allowing the steam<br />
unimpeded access to the biomass. The outlet for the oil-laden steam is usually incorporated into the<br />
design <strong>of</strong> the usually hemispherical, hinged still pot lid. The steam is then passed through the cooling<br />
system, either a plate heat exchanger or a surface heat exchanger, such as a cold-water condenser. The<br />
usually liquid condensate is separated into essential oil <strong>and</strong> distillation water in an appropriate oil<br />
separator such as a Florentine flask. The distillation water may, in some cases, be redistilled <strong>and</strong> any<br />
essential oil recovered dried <strong>and</strong> stored. Figure 4.10 shows a cross section <strong>of</strong> such a still.<br />
The following illustrations show different parts <strong>of</strong> an essential oil production plant. Figure 4.11<br />
shows a battery <strong>of</strong> four production units in the factory. Each still has a capacity <strong>of</strong> 3000–5000 L. Owing<br />
to their large size, the upper half <strong>of</strong> the stills is on the level as shown while the lower half is situated on<br />
the lower level. Figure 4.12 shows open stills <strong>and</strong> displays the steam/oil vapor outlets on the underside<br />
<strong>of</strong> the lids leading to the cooling units. On the right side <strong>of</strong> the illustration, one can see the perforated<br />
plate used to prevent clumping <strong>of</strong> the biomass. Several such perforated plates, up to 12, depending on<br />
the type <strong>of</strong> biomass, are used to prevent clumping. Spacers on the central upright control the optimum<br />
distance between these plates for improved steam penetration. Figure 4.13 shows the unloading <strong>of</strong> the<br />
still. Unloading is much faster than the loading process where the biomass is compacted either manually<br />
or by means <strong>of</strong> tractor wheel (Figure 4.14). This type <strong>of</strong> loading is called “open mouth” loading.<br />
Figure 4.15 shows the cooling unit. The cold water enters the tank equipped with a coil condenser. The<br />
cooling water is recycled so that no water is wasted. The two main types <strong>of</strong> industrially used condensers
Production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 103<br />
Vapor + Oil<br />
Biomass<br />
Steam<br />
Separation bottoms<br />
Condenser<br />
Oil<br />
Back to steam generator<br />
Florentine flask<br />
Water<br />
FIGURE 4.10 Cross section <strong>of</strong> a hydrodistillation plant.<br />
are the following. The earliest was the coil condenser that consisted <strong>of</strong> a coiled tube fixed in an open<br />
vessel <strong>of</strong> cold water with cold water entering the tank from the bottom <strong>and</strong> leaving at the top. The oilrich<br />
steam is passed through the coils <strong>of</strong> the condenser from the top end. The second type <strong>of</strong> condenser<br />
is the pipe bundle condenser where the steam is passed through several vertical tubes immersed in a<br />
cold water tank. The tubes have on the inside walls horizontal protuberances that slow down the rate <strong>of</strong><br />
the steam flow <strong>and</strong> thus result in more effective cooling. Figure 4.16 shows the inside <strong>of</strong> a Florentine<br />
flask where the oil is separated from the water. Most essential oils are lighter than water <strong>and</strong> thus float<br />
on top <strong>of</strong> the water. Some essential oils have a specific gravity >1, for example, they are heavier than<br />
water thus collecting at the bottom <strong>of</strong> the collection vessel. A modified design <strong>of</strong> the Florentine flask for<br />
such oils is shown in Figure 4.17. Figure 4.18 shows oil in the presence <strong>of</strong> turbid distillation water. The<br />
liquid phase is contaminated with biomass matter <strong>and</strong> the oil has to be filtered. The capacity <strong>of</strong> the still<br />
pot depends on the biomass. Weights vary from 150 to 650 kg/m 3 . Wilted <strong>and</strong> dried plants are much<br />
lighter than seeds <strong>and</strong> fruits or dried roots that can be very heavy.<br />
FIGURE 4.11 Battery <strong>of</strong> four distillation units.
104 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
FIGURE 4.12 Open kettle with opening for vapor <strong>and</strong> oil.<br />
A very special case is the production <strong>of</strong> the essential oils <strong>of</strong> Ylang-Ylang from the fresh flowers <strong>of</strong><br />
Cananga odorata (Lam.) Hook. f. et Thomson forma genuina. The flowers are water distilled, stopped,<br />
<strong>and</strong> restarted again. In this manner, a total <strong>of</strong> four fractions is obtained. The chemical composition <strong>of</strong><br />
the first fraction is characterized by a high concentration <strong>of</strong> p-cresol methylether, methyl benzoate,<br />
benzylacetate, linalool, <strong>and</strong> E-cinnamyl acetate. The second fraction contains less f those volatiles but<br />
an increased amount <strong>of</strong> geraniol, geranyl acetate, <strong>and</strong> b-caryophyllene. The third fraction contains<br />
higher boiling substances such as germacrene-D, (E,E)-a-farnesene, (E,E)-farnesole, benzyl benzoate,<br />
(E,E)-farnesyl acetate, <strong>and</strong> benzyl salicylate. Of course, smaller quantities <strong>of</strong> the lower boiling<br />
FIGURE 4.13 Unloading a kettle.
Production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 105<br />
FIGURE 4.14 Loading a kettle <strong>and</strong> pressing by concreted tractor wheel.<br />
components are also present. This kind <strong>of</strong> fractionation has been practiced for a long time. At the same<br />
time, the whole oil, obtained by a single distillation is available as “Ylang complete.” This serves as<br />
an example <strong>of</strong> the importance the duration <strong>of</strong> the distillation can have on the quality <strong>of</strong> the oil.<br />
Raw materials occurring in the form <strong>of</strong> hard grains have to be comminuted, for example, ground<br />
up before water distillation. This is carried out in the presence <strong>of</strong> water, such as in a wet-grinding<br />
turbine, <strong>and</strong> the water is used later during the distillation. The stills themselves are equipped with<br />
blade stirrers ensuring thorough mixing <strong>and</strong> particularly dislodging oil particles or biomass articles<br />
sticking to the walls <strong>of</strong> the still, the consequence <strong>of</strong> which can be burning <strong>and</strong> burnt notes. Dry grinding<br />
is likely to result in a significant loss <strong>of</strong> volatiles. Pepper, cori<strong>and</strong>er, cardamom, celery seed, <strong>and</strong><br />
angelica seed as well as roots, cumin, caraway, <strong>and</strong> many other seeds <strong>and</strong> fruit are treated in this<br />
manner. The process used in all these cases is called “turbo distillation.” The ratio oil/condensate is<br />
FIGURE 4.15 Cooling unit.
106 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
FIGURE 4.16 Inner part <strong>of</strong> a Florentine flask.<br />
very low when this method is used <strong>and</strong> it is for that reason that turbo distillation uses a fractionating<br />
column to enrich the volatiles. This also assists in preventing small particles <strong>of</strong> biomass passing into<br />
the condenser <strong>and</strong> contaminating the oil. As in many other distillation <strong>and</strong> rectification units,<br />
cold traps are installed to capture any very volatile oil constituents that may be present. This waterdistillation<br />
procedure is also used for gums such as myrrh, olibanum, opopanax, <strong>and</strong> benzoin.<br />
Orris roots are also extracted by water distillation. However, in this case, the distillation has to<br />
be carried out under conditions <strong>of</strong> slightly elevated pressure. This is achieved by means <strong>of</strong> a reflux<br />
column filled with Raschig rings. This is important as the desired constituents, the irones, exhibit<br />
very high boiling points. It is noteworthy that in this case there is no cooling <strong>of</strong> the vapors, as not<br />
only the irones but also the long-chain hydrocarbons will immediately be transported to the top<br />
<strong>of</strong> the column. Figure 4.19 shows a Florentine flask with the condensed oil/water emerging at a<br />
temperature <strong>of</strong> nearly 98°C. Orris oil or orris butter (note that the term orris “concrete” is incorrect,<br />
as the process is not a solvent extraction) is one <strong>of</strong> the few essential oils that are, at least partly, solid<br />
at room temperature. Depending on its trans-anethole content rectified star anise oil is another<br />
example <strong>of</strong> this nature.<br />
Water<br />
Oil<br />
Oil<br />
Oil heavier than water<br />
Water<br />
Oil lighter than water<br />
FIGURE 4.17 Two varieties <strong>of</strong> Florentine flasks.
Production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 107<br />
FIGURE 4.18 (See color insert following page 468.) Oil <strong>and</strong> muddy water in the Florentine flask.<br />
A relatively new technique that saves time in loading <strong>and</strong> unloading <strong>of</strong> the biomass is the “onsite”<br />
or “container” distillation. The technique is very simple as the container that is used to pick up<br />
the biomass <strong>and</strong> transport it to the distillery serves itself as the still pot. The first plant crops treated<br />
in this way were peppermint <strong>and</strong> mint, clary sage, lav<strong>and</strong>in grosso, L. angustifolia, Eucalyptus<br />
polybractea, <strong>and</strong> tea tree. In its simplest form, the mobile still assembly is composed <strong>of</strong> the following<br />
components: A tractor is coupled to an agricultural harvester that cuts the plant material <strong>and</strong><br />
delivers it directly into the still pot (or vat) via a chute. The still pot (vat) is permanently fixed onto<br />
a trailer that is coupled to the harvester. Once the still pot is completely filled, it is towed by the<br />
tractor into the factory where it is uncoupled <strong>and</strong> attached to the steam supply <strong>and</strong> condenser <strong>and</strong><br />
FIGURE 4.19 Orris distillation, Florentine flask at nearly 98°C.
108 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
distillation commences. Presupposition for a proper working <strong>of</strong> the container as vat is a perfect<br />
insulation. Every loss <strong>of</strong> steam <strong>and</strong> heat will guide to worse quality <strong>and</strong> diminished quantity. Lids<br />
will have to be placed properly <strong>and</strong> fixed by clamps. The tractor <strong>and</strong> harvester are attached to an<br />
empty still pot <strong>and</strong> the process is repeated. The design, shape, <strong>and</strong> size <strong>of</strong> the still pot as well as the<br />
type <strong>of</strong> agricultural harvester depend on the type <strong>of</strong> plant crop, the size <strong>of</strong> the plantation, the terrain,<br />
<strong>and</strong> so on. The extracted biomass can be used as mulch or, after drying, as fuel for the steam boiler.<br />
The unloading is automated using metal chains running over the tubes with steam valves. This<br />
method requires less manpower <strong>and</strong> thus reduces labor costs. Loading <strong>and</strong> unloading costs are<br />
minimal. It lends itself best to fresh biomass, lavender <strong>and</strong> lav<strong>and</strong>in, mallee eucalypts, tea tree, <strong>and</strong><br />
so on. It may not be as useful for the harvesting <strong>and</strong> distillation <strong>of</strong> mint <strong>and</strong> peppermint as these<br />
crops have to be wilted before oil extraction. Figures 4.20 through 4.22 show the harvesting <strong>of</strong><br />
mallee eucalyptus, containers in processing, <strong>and</strong> the whole site <strong>of</strong> container distillation. Figure 4.23<br />
gives a view into the interior <strong>of</strong> a container.<br />
Another interesting distillation method has been developed by the LBP Freising, Bavaria,<br />
Germany. The plant consists <strong>of</strong> two tubes, each 2 m long <strong>and</strong> 25 cm in diameter, open at the top. The<br />
tubes are attached vertically to a central axis that can be rotated. One tube is connected, hydraulically<br />
or mechanically, to the steam generator <strong>and</strong> on top to a condenser. During the distillation <strong>of</strong><br />
the contents <strong>of</strong> the tube, which may take 25–40 min depending on the biomass, the other tube can<br />
be loaded. When the distillation <strong>of</strong> the first tube has been completed the tubes are rotated around<br />
the axis <strong>and</strong> distillation <strong>of</strong> the second tube commenced. The first distilled tube can now be emptied<br />
<strong>and</strong> reloaded. The only disadvantage <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> apparatus is the small size. Only 8.5–21 kg <strong>of</strong><br />
biomass can be treated. This system has been developed for farmers intending to produce small<br />
quantities <strong>of</strong> essential oil. The apparatus is transportable on a truck <strong>and</strong> will work satisfactorily<br />
provided a supply <strong>of</strong> power is available.<br />
Most commercially utilized essential oil distillation methods, excepting the mobile still on-site<br />
methods, suffer from high labor costs. Apart from harvesting the biomass, 3–4 laborers will be<br />
required to load <strong>and</strong> unload the distillation pots, regulating steam pressure <strong>and</strong> temperature, <strong>and</strong> so<br />
on. The loading <strong>and</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> the biomass in the distillation vessel may not be homogeneous.<br />
This will adversely affect the steam flow through the biomass by channeling, for example, the steam<br />
passing through less compacted areas <strong>and</strong> thus not reaching other more compacted areas. This will<br />
result in lower oil yields <strong>and</strong> perhaps even alter the composition <strong>of</strong> the oil. In times <strong>of</strong> high energy<br />
FIGURE 4.20 Harvesting blue mallee with distillation container.
Production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 109<br />
FIGURE 4.21 A battery <strong>of</strong> containers to be distilled, one opened to show the biomass.<br />
costs the need for consequent recovery has to be considered. Given the dem<strong>and</strong> for greater quantities<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils, the question is how to achieve it <strong>and</strong> at the same time improve the quality <strong>of</strong><br />
the oils. For this, several considerations have to be taken into account. The first is how to process<br />
large quantities <strong>of</strong> biomass in a given time? Manpower has to be decreased as it still is the most<br />
important factor affecting costs. The biomass as a whole has to be treated uniformly to ensure<br />
higher oil yields <strong>and</strong> more constant <strong>and</strong> thus better oil composition. How can energy costs <strong>and</strong> water<br />
requirements be reduced in an ecologically acceptable way? The answer to this was the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> continuous distillation during the last years <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century. Until then all distillation<br />
processes were discontinuous. Stills had to be loaded, the distillation stopped, <strong>and</strong> stills<br />
unloaded. The idea was to develop a process where the steam production was continuous with permanent<br />
unchanged parameters. This was achieved by the introduction <strong>of</strong> an endless screw that fed<br />
the plant material slowly into the still pot from the top <strong>and</strong> removed the exhausted plant material<br />
from the bottom at the same speed. The plant material moves against the flow <strong>of</strong> dry steam entering<br />
the still from the bottom. In this fashion, all <strong>of</strong> the biomass comes into contact with the steam ensuring<br />
optimum essential oil extraction.<br />
FIGURE 4.22 Distillation plant with container technique.
110 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
FIGURE 4.23 View inside the distillation container, showing the steam tubes <strong>and</strong> the metallic grid.<br />
The earliest <strong>of</strong> these methods is known as the “Padova System.” It consists <strong>of</strong> a still pot 6 m high<br />
<strong>and</strong> about 1.6 m in diameter (Arnodou, 1991). Its total volume is about 8 m 3 . The feeding <strong>of</strong> the still<br />
with the plant biomass as well as its subsequent removal is a continuous process. The plant material<br />
is delivered via a feed hopper situated at the top <strong>of</strong> the still. Before entering the still, it is compressed<br />
<strong>and</strong> cut by a rotating knife to ensure a more uniform size. Finally, a horizontal moving cone<br />
regulates the quantity <strong>of</strong> biomass entering the still. The biomass that enters the still moves in the<br />
opposite direction to that <strong>of</strong> the steam. The steam saturated with essential oil vapors is then passed<br />
into the cooling system. The exhausted plant material is simultaneously removed by means <strong>of</strong> an<br />
Archimedes screw. This type <strong>of</strong> plant was originally designed for the distillation <strong>of</strong> wine residues.<br />
A different system is provided by the distillation chimie fine (DCF) aroma process continuous distillation.<br />
Once again the plant material is delivered via a hopper to several interconnected tubes.<br />
These tubes are slightly inclined <strong>and</strong> connected to each other. The biomass is carried slowly through<br />
the tubes, by means <strong>of</strong> a worm screw, in a downward direction. Steam is injected at the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />
last tube <strong>and</strong> is directed upward in the opposite direction to that <strong>of</strong> the movement <strong>of</strong> the plant material.<br />
The essential oil-laden steam is deflected near the point <strong>of</strong> entrance <strong>of</strong> the biomass, into the<br />
condenser. The exhausted plant material is unloaded by another worm screw located near the point<br />
<strong>of</strong> the steam entrance to the system.<br />
Texarome, a big producer <strong>of</strong> cedarwood oil <strong>and</strong> related products holds a patent on another continuous<br />
distillation system. In contrast to other systems, the biomass is conveyed pneumatically<br />
within the system. It is a novel system spiked with new technology <strong>of</strong> that time. Texan cedarwood<br />
oil is produced from the whole tree, branches, roots, <strong>and</strong> stumps. Cedarwood used in Virginia uses<br />
exclusively branches, stumps, saw dust, <strong>and</strong> other waste for oil production; wood is used mainly<br />
for furniture making. The wood is passed through a chipper <strong>and</strong> then through a hammer mill.<br />
The dust is collected by means <strong>of</strong> a cyclone. Any coarse dust is reground to the desired size. The<br />
dust is now carried via a plug feeder to the first contactor where superheated steam in reverse flow
Production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 111<br />
exhausts it in a first step <strong>and</strong> following that in a similar second step at the next contactor. The steam<br />
<strong>and</strong> oil vapors are carried into a condenser. The liquid distillate is then separated in Florentine<br />
flasks. This process does all transport entirely by pneumatic means. The recycling <strong>of</strong> cooling water<br />
<strong>and</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> the dried plant matter as a fuel contribute to environmental requirements (Arnodou,<br />
1991). In the 1990s, the BIOLANDES Company designed its own system <strong>of</strong> continuous distillation.<br />
The reason for this was BIOLANDES’ engagement in the forests <strong>of</strong> south-western France.<br />
Between Bordeaux <strong>and</strong> Biarritz exists the most important area <strong>of</strong> pine trees (Pinus pinaster Sol.)<br />
supplying the paper industry. Twigs <strong>and</strong> needles have been burnt or left to rot to assist with reforestation<br />
with new trees. These needles contain a fine essential oil very similar to that <strong>of</strong> the dwarf<br />
pine oil (Pinus mugo Turra.). Compared to other needle oils dwarf pine oil is very expensive <strong>and</strong><br />
greatly appreciated. The oil was produced by a discontinuous distillation but as dem<strong>and</strong> rose, new<br />
<strong>and</strong> improved methods were required. First <strong>of</strong> all, the collection <strong>of</strong> the branches had to be improved.<br />
A tractor equipped with a crude grinder <strong>and</strong> a ground wood storage box follows the wood <strong>and</strong><br />
branch cutters <strong>and</strong> transports it to the nearby distillation unit where the biomass is exhausted via a<br />
continuous distillation process. In contrast to the earlier described methods the BIOLANDES<br />
continuous distillation process operates somewhat differently. The plant material is carried by<br />
mechanical means from the storage to the fine cutter <strong>and</strong> via an Archimedes screw to the top <strong>of</strong> the<br />
distillation pot. The plant material is now compressed by another vertical screw <strong>and</strong> transported<br />
into a chamber which is then hermetically closed on its back but opening at the front. Biomass is<br />
falling down allowing the countercurrent passage <strong>of</strong> hot steam through it. The steam is supplied<br />
through numerous nozzles. Endless screws at the bottom <strong>of</strong> the still continuously dispose <strong>of</strong> the<br />
exhausted biomass. Oil-laden steam is channeled from the top <strong>of</strong> the still into condenser <strong>and</strong> then<br />
the oil separator.<br />
It is well known that clary sage yields an essential oil on hydrodistillation. However, a very<br />
important component <strong>of</strong> this oil, sclareole, is usually recovered in only very small quantity when<br />
this method is used, the reason for this being its very high boiling point. Sclareole can be recovered<br />
in very high yield <strong>and</strong> quality by extraction with volatile solvents. Consequently, BIOLANDES has<br />
incorporated an extraction step in its system (Figure 4.24). Any waste biomass, whether <strong>of</strong> extracted or<br />
nonextracted material, is used for energy production or, mostly, for composting. The energy recovery<br />
management distinguishes this system from all other earlier described processes. In all <strong>of</strong> the latter,<br />
FIGURE 4.24 Scheme <strong>of</strong> the BIOLANDES continuous production unit. A: biomass; B: distillation vat;<br />
C: condenser; D: Florentine flask; E: extraction unit; F: solvent recovery; G: exhausted biomass.
112 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
large amounts <strong>of</strong> cold water are required to condense the essential oil-laden steam. This results in<br />
significant wastage <strong>of</strong> water as well as in latent energy losses. The BIOLANDES system recovers<br />
this latent heat. Hot water from the condenser is carried into an aerodynamic radiator. Air used as<br />
the transfer gas takes up the energy <strong>of</strong> the hot water, cooling it down, so that it can be recycled to<br />
the condenser. The hot air is then used to dry about one-third <strong>of</strong> the biomass waste that is used as<br />
an energy source for steam <strong>and</strong> even electricity production. In other words, this system is energetically<br />
self-sufficient. Furthermore, since it is fully automated, it results in constant quality products.<br />
A unit comprising two stills <strong>of</strong> 7.5 m 3 capacity can treat per hour 3 ton <strong>of</strong> pine needles, 1.5 ton <strong>of</strong><br />
juniper branches, <strong>and</strong> 0.25 ton <strong>of</strong> cistus branches (Arnodou, 1991). The advantages are once<br />
again short processing time <strong>of</strong> large amounts <strong>of</strong> biomass, reduced labor costs, <strong>and</strong> near complete<br />
energy sufficiency. All operations are automated <strong>and</strong> water consumption is reduced to a minimum.<br />
The system can also operate under slight pressure thus improving the recovery <strong>of</strong> higher boiling<br />
oil constituents.<br />
The following is a controversial method for essential oil extraction by comparison with classical<br />
hydrodistillation methods. In this method, the steam enters the distillation chamber from the top<br />
passes through the biomass in the still pot (e.g., the distillation chamber) <strong>and</strong> percolates into the<br />
condenser located below it. Separation <strong>of</strong> the oil from the aqueous phase occurs in a battery <strong>of</strong><br />
Florentine flasks. It is claimed that this method is very gentle <strong>and</strong> thus suitable for the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
sensitive plants. The biomass is held in the still chamber (e.g., still pot) on a grid that allows easy<br />
disposal <strong>of</strong> the spent plant matter at the completion <strong>of</strong> the distillation. The whole apparatus is relatively<br />
small, distillation times are reduced, <strong>and</strong> there is less chance <strong>of</strong> the oil being overheated. It<br />
appears that this method is fairly costly <strong>and</strong> thus likely to be used only for very high-priced<br />
biomass.<br />
Recently, microwave-assisted hydrodistillation methods have been developed, so far mainly in<br />
the laboratory or only for small-scale projects. Glass vessels filled with biomass, mainly herbs <strong>and</strong><br />
fruits or seeds, are heated by microwave power. By controlling the temperature at the center <strong>of</strong> the<br />
vessel, dry heat conditions are established at about 100°C. As the plant material contains enough<br />
water, the volatiles are evaporated together with the steam solely generated by the microwave heat<br />
<strong>and</strong> can be collected in a suitably designed condenser/cooling system. In this case, changes in the<br />
composition <strong>of</strong> the oil will be less pronounced than in oil obtained by conventional hydrodistillation.<br />
This method has attracted interest owing to the mild heat to which the plant matter is exposed.<br />
Kosar reported improvements in the quality <strong>of</strong> microwave extracted fennel oil due to increases in<br />
the yields <strong>of</strong> its oxygenated components (Kosar et al., 2007).<br />
Very different products can result from the dry distillation <strong>of</strong> plant matter. ISO St<strong>and</strong>ard 9235<br />
specifies in Section 3.1.4 that products <strong>of</strong> dry distillation, for example, “… obtained by distillation<br />
without added water or steam” are in fact essential oils (ISO/DIS 9235.2, 1997, p. 2). Dry distillation<br />
involves heating in the absence <strong>of</strong> aerial oxygen, normally in a closed vessel, preventing combustion.<br />
The plant material is thus decomposed to new chemical substances. Birch tar from the wood<br />
exsudate <strong>of</strong> Betula pendula Roth. <strong>and</strong> cade oil from the wood <strong>of</strong> Juniperus oxycedrus L. are manufactured<br />
in this way. Both oils contain phenols, some <strong>of</strong> which are recognized carcinogens. For this<br />
reason, the production <strong>of</strong> these two oils is no longer <strong>of</strong> any commercial importance, though very<br />
highly rectified <strong>and</strong> almost phenol-free cade oils do exist.<br />
Some essential oils require rectification. This involves redistillation <strong>of</strong> the crude oil in order to<br />
remove certain undesirable impurities, such as very small amounts <strong>of</strong> constituents <strong>of</strong> very low volatility,<br />
carried over during the steam or water distillation (such as high-molecular-weight phenols,<br />
leaf wax components, etc.) as well as small amounts <strong>of</strong> very volatile compounds exhibiting an undesirable<br />
odor, <strong>and</strong> thus affecting the top note <strong>of</strong> the oils, such as sulfur compounds (dimethyl sulfide<br />
present in crude peppermint oil), isovaleric aldehyde (present in E. globulus oil), <strong>and</strong> certain nitrogenous<br />
compounds (low-boiling amines, etc.). In some cases, rectification can also be used to enrich<br />
the essential oil in a particular component such as 1,8-cineole in low-grade eucalyptus oil.<br />
Rectification is usually carried out by redistillation under vacuum to avoid overheating <strong>and</strong> thus
Production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 113<br />
partial decomposition <strong>of</strong> the oil’s constituents. It can also be carried out by steaming. Commonly<br />
rectified oils include eucalyptus, clove, mint, turpentine, peppermint, <strong>and</strong> patchouli. In the case <strong>of</strong><br />
patchouli <strong>and</strong> clove oils, rectification improves their, <strong>of</strong>ten unacceptably, dark color.<br />
Fractionation <strong>of</strong> essential oils on a commercial scale is carried out in order to isolate fractions<br />
containing a particular compound in very major proportions <strong>and</strong> occasionally even individual<br />
essential oil constituents in a pure state. In order to achieve the required separation, fractionations<br />
are conducted under reduced pressure (e.g., under vacuum) to prevent thermal decomposition <strong>of</strong><br />
the oil constituents, using efficient fractionating columns. A number <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> fractionating<br />
columns are known but the one most commonly used in laboratory stills or small commercial<br />
stills is a glass or stainless steel column filled with Raschig rings. Raschig rings are short,<br />
narrow diameter, rings made <strong>of</strong> glass, or any other chemically inert material. Examples <strong>of</strong> compounds<br />
produced on a commercial scale are citral (a mixture <strong>of</strong> geranial <strong>and</strong> neral) from Litsea<br />
cubeba, 1,8-cineole from eucalyptus oil (mainly Eucalyptus polybractea <strong>and</strong> other cineole-rich<br />
species) as well as from Cinnamomum camphora oil, eugenol from clove leaf oil, a-pinene from<br />
turpentine, citronellal from citronella oil, linalool from Ho-oil, geraniol from palmarosa oil, <strong>and</strong><br />
so on. A small-scale high vacuum plant used for citral production is shown in Figure 4.25. The<br />
reflux ratio, for example, the amount <strong>of</strong> distillate collected <strong>and</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> distillate returned<br />
to the still, controls equilibrium conditions <strong>of</strong> the vapors near the top <strong>of</strong> the fractionation column,<br />
which are essential for good separation <strong>of</strong> the oil constituents.<br />
FIGURE 4.25 High vacuum rectification plant in small scale. The distillation assembly is composed <strong>of</strong> a<br />
distillation vessel (1) <strong>of</strong> glass, placed in an electric heating collar (2). The vessel is surmounted by a jacketed<br />
fractionation column (3), packed with glass spirals or Raschig rings, <strong>of</strong> such a height as to achieve maximum<br />
efficiency (e.g., have the maximum number <strong>of</strong> theoretical plates capable <strong>of</strong> being achieved for this type <strong>of</strong><br />
apparatus). The reflux ratio is automatically regulated by a device (4), which also includes the head condenser<br />
(5), a glass tube leads the product to another condenser (6), from there to the both receivers (7). The vacuum<br />
pump unit is placed on the right (8).
114 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Apart from employing fractional distillation, with or without the application <strong>of</strong> a vacuum, some<br />
essential oil constituents are also obtained on a commercial scale by freezing out from the essential<br />
oil, followed by centrifugation at below freezing point <strong>of</strong> the desired product. Examples are menthol<br />
from Mentha species (this is usually further purified by recrystallization from a suitable solvent,<br />
trans-anethole from anise oil, star anise oil, <strong>and</strong> particularly fennel seed oil <strong>and</strong> 1,8-cineole from<br />
cineole-rich eucalyptus oils.<br />
Most essential oils are complex mixtures <strong>of</strong> terpenic <strong>and</strong> sesquiterpenic hydrocarbons, <strong>and</strong> their<br />
oxygenated terpenoid <strong>and</strong> sesquiterpenoid derivatives (alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, esters, <strong>and</strong><br />
occasionally carboxylic acids), as well as aromatic (benzenoid) compounds such as phenols, phenolic<br />
ethers, <strong>and</strong> aromatic esters. So-called “terpene-less” <strong>and</strong> “sesquiterpene-less essential oils are<br />
commonly used in the flavor industry. Many terpenes are bitter in taste <strong>and</strong> many, particularly the<br />
terpenic hydrocarbons, are poorly soluble or even completely insoluble in water–ethanol mixtures.<br />
Since the hydrocarbons rarely contribute anything <strong>of</strong> importance to their flavoring properties, their<br />
removal is a commercial necessity. They are removed by the so-called “washing process,” a method<br />
used mostly for the treatment <strong>of</strong> citrus oils. This process takes advantage <strong>of</strong> the different polarities<br />
<strong>of</strong> individual essential oil constituents. The essential oil is added to a carefully selected solvent (usually<br />
a water–ethanol solution) <strong>and</strong> the mixture partitioned by prolonged stirring. This removes some<br />
<strong>of</strong> the more polar oil constituents into the water–ethanol phase (e.g., the solvent phase). Since a<br />
single partitioning step is not sufficient to effect complete separation, the whole process has to be<br />
repeated several times. The water–ethanol fractions are combined <strong>and</strong> the solvent removed. The<br />
residue contains now very much reduced amounts <strong>of</strong> hydrocarbons but has been greatly enriched<br />
in the desired polar oxygenated flavor constituents, aldehydes such as octanal, nonanal, decanal,<br />
hexenal, geranial, <strong>and</strong> neral; alcohols such as nerol, geraniol, <strong>and</strong> terpinen-4-ol; oxides such as<br />
1,8-cineole <strong>and</strong> 1,4-cineole; as well as esters <strong>and</strong> sometimes carboxylic acids. Apart from water–<br />
ethanol mixtures, hexane or light petroleum fractions (sometimes called “petroleum ether”) have<br />
sometimes also been added as they will enhance the separation process. However, these are highly<br />
flammable liquids <strong>and</strong> care has to be taken in their use.<br />
“Folded” or “concentrated” oils are citrus oils from which some <strong>of</strong> the undesirable components<br />
(usually limonene) have been removed by high vacuum distillation. In order to avoid thermal degradation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the oil, temperatures have to be kept as low as possible. Occasionally, a solvent is used as<br />
a “towing” agent to keep the temperature low.<br />
Another, more complex, method for the concentration <strong>of</strong> citrus oils is a chromatographic separation<br />
using packed columns. This method allows a complete elimination <strong>of</strong> the unwanted hydrocarbons.<br />
This method, invented by Erich Ziegler, uses columns packed with either silica or aluminum<br />
oxide. The oil is introduced onto the column <strong>and</strong> the hydrocarbons eluted by means <strong>of</strong> a suitable<br />
nonpolar solvent <strong>of</strong> very low boiling point. The desirable polar citrus oil components are then<br />
washed out using a polar solvent (Ziegler, 1982).<br />
Yet another valuable flavor product <strong>of</strong> citrus fruits is the “essence oil.” The favored method for<br />
the transport <strong>of</strong> citrus juice is in the form <strong>of</strong> a frozen juice concentrate. The fruit juice is partly<br />
dehydrated by distilling <strong>of</strong>f under vacuum the greater part <strong>of</strong> the water <strong>and</strong> frozen. Distilling <strong>of</strong>f the<br />
water results in significant losses <strong>of</strong> the desirable volatiles responsible for the aroma <strong>of</strong> the fruit.<br />
These volatiles are captured in several cold traps <strong>and</strong> constitute the “aqueous essence” or “essence<br />
oil” that has the typical fruity <strong>and</strong> fresh fragrance, but slightly less aldehydic than that <strong>of</strong> the oil.<br />
This oil is used to enhance the flavor <strong>of</strong> the reconstituted juice obtained by thawing <strong>and</strong> dilution<br />
with water <strong>of</strong> the frozen concentrate.<br />
Producing essential oils today is, from a marketing point <strong>of</strong> view, a complex matter. As in the<br />
field <strong>of</strong> other finished products, the requirements <strong>of</strong> the buyer or producer <strong>of</strong> the consumer product<br />
must be fulfilled. The evaluation <strong>of</strong> commercial aspects <strong>of</strong> essential oil production is not an easy<br />
task <strong>and</strong> requires careful consideration. There is no sense in producing oils in oversupply. Areas <strong>of</strong><br />
short supply, depending on climatic or political circumstances should be identified <strong>and</strong> acted<br />
upon. As in other industries global trends are an important tool <strong>and</strong> should continually be monitored.
Production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 115<br />
For example, which are the essential oils that cannot be replaced by synthetic substitutes such as<br />
patchouli oil or blue chamomile oils? A solution to this problem can lie in the breeding <strong>of</strong> suitable<br />
plants. For example, a producer <strong>of</strong> a new kind “pastis,” the traditional aperitif <strong>of</strong> France, wants to<br />
introduce a new flavor with a rosy note in the fennel component <strong>of</strong> the flavor. This will require the<br />
study <strong>and</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> oil constituents with “rosy” notes <strong>and</strong> help biologists to create new botanical<br />
varieties by genetic crossing, for example, by genetic manipulation, <strong>of</strong> suitable target plant<br />
species. Any new lines will first be tested in the laboratory <strong>and</strong> then in field trials. Test distillations<br />
will be carried out <strong>and</strong> the chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the oils determined. Agronomists <strong>and</strong> farmers<br />
will be involved in all agricultural aspects <strong>of</strong> the projects: soil research <strong>and</strong> harvesting techniques.<br />
Variability <strong>of</strong> all physicochemical aspects <strong>of</strong> the new strains will be evaluated. At this point, the<br />
new types <strong>of</strong> essential oils will be presented to the client. If the client is satisfied with the quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> the oils, the first larger plantations shall be established <strong>and</strong> consumer market research will be<br />
initiated. If everything has gone to plan, that is all technical problems have been successfully<br />
resolved <strong>and</strong> the finished product has met with the approval <strong>of</strong> the consumers, large-scale production<br />
can begin. This example describes the current way <strong>of</strong> satisfying customer dem<strong>and</strong>s.<br />
Global dem<strong>and</strong> for essential oils is on the increase. This also generates some serious problems<br />
for which immediate solutions may not easily be found. The first problem is the higher dem<strong>and</strong> for<br />
certain essential oils by some <strong>of</strong> the world’s very major producers <strong>of</strong> cosmetics. They sometimes<br />
contract oil quantities that can be <strong>of</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> 70% <strong>of</strong> world production. This will not only raise<br />
the price but also restrict consumer access to certain products. From this arises another problem.<br />
Our market is to some extent a market <strong>of</strong> copycats. How can one formulate the fragrance <strong>of</strong> a competitor’s<br />
product without having access to the particular essential oil used by him, particularly as<br />
this oil may have other functions than just being a fragrance, such as, for example, certain physiological<br />
effects on both the body as well as the mind? Lavender oil from L. angustifolia is a calming<br />
agent as well as possessing anti-inflammatory activity. No similar or equivalent natural essential oil<br />
capable <strong>of</strong> replacing it is known. Another problem affecting the large global players is ensuring the<br />
continuing availability <strong>of</strong> raw material <strong>of</strong> the required quality needed to satisfy market dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />
This is clearly an almost impossible dem<strong>and</strong> as nobody can assure that climatic conditions required<br />
for optimum growth <strong>of</strong> a particular essential oil crop will remain unchanged. Another problem may<br />
be the farmer himself. Sometimes it may be financially more worthwhile for the farmer to cultivate<br />
other than essential oil plant crops. All these factors may have some detrimental effects on the availability<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils. Man’s responsibility for the continued health <strong>of</strong> the environment may also<br />
be one <strong>of</strong> the reasons for the disappearance <strong>of</strong> an essential oil from the market. S<strong>and</strong>alwood (species<br />
<strong>of</strong> Santalum, but mainly Indian Santalum album) requires in some cases up to 100 years to regenerate<br />
to a point where they are large enough to be harvested. This <strong>and</strong> their uses in religious ceremonies<br />
have resulted in significant shortages <strong>of</strong> Indian oil. Owing to the large monetary value <strong>of</strong> Indian<br />
s<strong>and</strong>alwood oil, indiscriminate cutting <strong>of</strong> the wood has just about entirely eliminated it from native<br />
forests in Timor (Indonesia). S<strong>and</strong>alwood oils <strong>of</strong> other origins are available, Santalum spicatum<br />
from western Australia, <strong>and</strong> Santalum austrocaledonicum from New Caledonia <strong>and</strong> Vanuatu.<br />
However, their wood oils differ somewhat in odor as well as in chemical composition from genuine<br />
Indian oils.<br />
Some essential oils are disappearing from the market owing to the hazardous components they<br />
contain <strong>and</strong> are, therefore, banned from most applications in cosmetics <strong>and</strong> detergents. These oil<br />
components, all <strong>of</strong> which are labeled as being carcinogenic, include safrole, asarone, methyleugenol,<br />
<strong>and</strong> elemicin. Plant diseases are another reason for essential oil shortages as they, too, can be<br />
affected by a multitude <strong>of</strong> diseases, some cancerous, which can completely destroy the total crop.<br />
For example, French lavender is known to suffer from a condition whereby a particular protein<br />
causes a decrease in the growth <strong>of</strong> the lavender plants. This process could only be slowed down by<br />
cultivation at higher altitudes. In the middle <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century lavender has been cultivated in<br />
the Rhône valley at an altitude <strong>of</strong> 120 m. Today lavender is growing only at altitudes around 800 m.<br />
The growing shoots <strong>of</strong> lavender plants are attacked by various pests, in particular the larvae <strong>of</strong>
116 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Cécidomye (Thomasissiana lav<strong>and</strong>ula) which, if unchecked, will defoliate the plants <strong>and</strong> kill them.<br />
Some microorganisms such as Mycoplasma <strong>and</strong> a fungus Armillaria mellex can cause serious<br />
damage to plantations. At the present time, the use <strong>of</strong> herbicides <strong>and</strong> pesticides is an unavoidable<br />
necessity. Wild-growing plants are equally prone to attack by insect pests <strong>and</strong> plant diseases.<br />
The progression from wild-growing plants to essential oil production is an environmental problem.<br />
In some developing countries, damage to the natural balance can be traced back to overexploitation<br />
<strong>of</strong> wild-growing plants. Some <strong>of</strong> these plants are protected worldwide <strong>and</strong> their collection,<br />
processing, <strong>and</strong> illegal trading are punishable by law. In some Asian countries, such as in Vietnam,<br />
collection from the wild is state controlled <strong>and</strong> limited to quantities <strong>of</strong> biomass accruing from<br />
natural regeneration.<br />
The state <strong>of</strong> technical development <strong>of</strong> the production in the developing countries is very variable<br />
<strong>and</strong> depends largely on the geographical zone they are located in. Areas <strong>of</strong> particular relevance are<br />
Asia, Africa, South America, <strong>and</strong> eastern Europe. As a rule, the poorer the country, the more<br />
traditional <strong>and</strong> less technologically sophisticated equipment is used. Generally, st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>of</strong> the<br />
distillation apparatus are those <strong>of</strong> the 1980s. At that time, the distillation equipment was provided<br />
<strong>and</strong> installed by foreign aid programs with European <strong>and</strong> American know-how. Most <strong>of</strong> these units<br />
are still in existence <strong>and</strong>, owing to repairs <strong>and</strong> improvements by local people, in good working<br />
order. Occasionally, primitive equipment has been locally developed, particularly when the state did<br />
not provide any financial assistance. Initially, all mastery <strong>and</strong> expertise <strong>of</strong> distillation techniques<br />
came from Europe, mainly from France. Later on, that knowledge was acquired <strong>and</strong> transferred to<br />
their countries by local people who had studied in Europe. They are no longer dependent on foreign<br />
know-how <strong>and</strong> able to produce oils <strong>of</strong> constant quality. Conventional hydrodistillation is still the<br />
main essential oil extraction method used, one exception being hydrodiffusion <strong>of</strong>ten used in Central<br />
America, mainly Guatemala <strong>and</strong> El Salvador, <strong>and</strong> Brazil in South America. The construction <strong>of</strong> the<br />
equipment is carried out in the country itself <strong>and</strong> makes the producer independent from higherpriced<br />
imports. Steam is generated by oil-burning generators only in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> cities. In country<br />
areas, wood or dried spent biomass is used. As in all other essential oil-producing countries, the<br />
distillation plants are close to the cultivation areas. Wild-growing plants are collected, provided the<br />
infrastructure exists for their transport to the distillation plant. For certain specific products permanent<br />
fixed distillation plants are used. A forward leap in the technology will be only possible if<br />
sufficient investment funds became available in the future. <strong>Essential</strong> oil quantities produced in those<br />
countries are not small <strong>and</strong> important specialities such as citral-rich ginger oil from Ecuador play a<br />
role on the world market. It should be a compulsory requirement that developing countries treat<br />
their wild-growing plant resources with the utmost care. Harvesting has to be controlled to avoid<br />
their disappearance from the natural environment <strong>and</strong> quantities taken adjusted to the ability <strong>of</strong> the<br />
environment to spontaneously regenerate. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, cultivation will have to be h<strong>and</strong>led<br />
with equal care. The avoidance <strong>of</strong> monoculture will prevent leaching the soil <strong>of</strong> its nutrients <strong>and</strong><br />
guard the environment from possible insect propagation. Balanced agricultural practices will lead<br />
to a healthy environment <strong>and</strong> superior quality plants for the production <strong>of</strong> essential oils.<br />
The following are some pertinent remarks on the now prevailing views <strong>of</strong> “green culture” <strong>and</strong><br />
“organically” grown plants for essential oil production. It is unjustified to suggest that such products<br />
are <strong>of</strong> better quality or greater activity. Comparisons <strong>of</strong> chemical analyses <strong>of</strong> “bio-oils,” for<br />
example, oils from “organically” grown plants, <strong>and</strong> commercially produced oils show absolutely no<br />
differences, qualitative or quantitative, between them. While the concept <strong>of</strong> pesticide- <strong>and</strong> fertilizerfree<br />
agriculture is desirable <strong>and</strong> should be supported, the huge worldwide consumption <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oils could never be satisfied by bio-oils.<br />
Finally, some remarks as to the concept <strong>of</strong> honesty are attached to the production <strong>of</strong> natural<br />
essential oils. During the last 30 years or so, adulteration <strong>of</strong> essential oils could be found every day.<br />
During the early days, cheap fatty oils (e.g., peanut oil) were used to cut essential oils. Such adulterations<br />
were easily revealed by means <strong>of</strong> placing a drop <strong>of</strong> the oil on filter paper <strong>and</strong> allowing it to<br />
evaporate (Karg, 1981). While an unadulterated essential oil will evaporate completely or at worst
Production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 117<br />
leave only a trace <strong>of</strong> nonvolatile residue, a greasy patch indicates the presence <strong>of</strong> a fatty adulterant.<br />
As synthetic components <strong>of</strong> essential oils became available around the turn <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century<br />
some lavender <strong>and</strong> lav<strong>and</strong>in oils have been adulterated by the addition <strong>of</strong> synthetic linalool <strong>and</strong><br />
linalyl acetate to the stills before commencing the distillation <strong>of</strong> the plant material. With the advent<br />
<strong>of</strong> improved analytical methods, such as GC <strong>and</strong> GC/MS, techniques <strong>of</strong> adulterating essential oil<br />
were also refined. Lavender oil can again serve as an example. <strong>Oils</strong> distilled from mixtures <strong>of</strong> lavender<br />
<strong>and</strong> lav<strong>and</strong>in flowers mimicked the properties <strong>of</strong> genuine good-quality lavender oils. However,<br />
with the introduction <strong>of</strong> chiral GC techniques, such adulterations were easily identified <strong>and</strong> the<br />
genuineness <strong>of</strong> the oils guaranteed. This also allowed the verification <strong>of</strong> the enantiomeric distribution<br />
<strong>of</strong> monoterpenes, monoterpenoid alcohols, <strong>and</strong> esters present in essential oils. Nuclear magnetic<br />
resonance (NMR) is probably one <strong>of</strong> the best, but also one <strong>of</strong> the most expensive, methods available<br />
for the authentication <strong>of</strong> naturalness <strong>and</strong> will be cost effective only with large batch quantities or in<br />
the case <strong>of</strong> very expensive oils. In the future, two-dimensional GC (GC/GC) will provide the next<br />
step for the control <strong>of</strong> naturalness <strong>of</strong> essential oils.<br />
Another important aspect is the correct botanical source <strong>of</strong> the essential oil. This can perhaps<br />
best be discussed with reference to eucalyptus oil <strong>of</strong> the 1,8-cineole type. Originally, before commercial<br />
eucalyptus oil production commenced in Australia, eucalyptus oil was distilled mainly<br />
from E. globulus Labill. trees introduced into Europe [mainly Portugal <strong>and</strong> Spain (ISO St<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
770)]. It should be noted that this species exists in several subspecies: E. globulus subsp. bicostata<br />
(Maiden, Blakely, & J. Simm.) Kirkpatr., E. globulus Labill. subsp. globulus., E. globulus subsp.<br />
pseudoglobulus (Naudin ex Maiden) Kirkpatr., <strong>and</strong> E. globulus subsp. maidenii (F. Muell.) Kirkpatr.<br />
It has been shown that the European oils were in fact mixed oils <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> these subspecies <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
their hybrids (report by H. H. G. McKern <strong>of</strong> ISO/TC 54 meeting held in Portugal in 1966). The<br />
European Pharmacopoeia Monograph 0390 defines eucalyptus oil as the oil obtained from E. globulus<br />
Labill., Eucalyptus fruticetorum F. von Mueller Syn. Eucalyptus polybractea R. T. Baker (this<br />
is the correct botanical name), Eucalyptus smithii R. T. Baker, <strong>and</strong> other species <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus rich<br />
in 1,8-cineole. The Council <strong>of</strong> Europe’s book Plants in cosmetics, Vol. 1, page 127 confuses the<br />
matter even further. It entitles the monograph as E. globulus Labill. et al. species, for example,<br />
includes any number <strong>of</strong> unnamed Eucalyptus species. The Pharmacopoeia <strong>of</strong> the Peoples Republic<br />
<strong>of</strong> China (English Version, Vol. 1) 1997 goes even further defining eucalyptus oil as the oil obtained<br />
from E. globulus Labill. <strong>and</strong> Cinnamomum camphora as well as from other plants <strong>of</strong> those two<br />
families. ISO St<strong>and</strong>ard 3065—Oil <strong>of</strong> Australian eucalyptus, 80–85% cineole content, simply mentions<br />
that the oil is distilled from the appropriate species. The foregoing passage simply shows<br />
that Eucalyptus oil does not necessarily have to be distilled from a single species <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus,<br />
for example, E. globulus, although suggesting that it is admissible to include 1,8-cineole-rich<br />
Cinna momum oils is incorrect <strong>and</strong> unrealistic. This kind <strong>of</strong> problem is not unusual or unique. For<br />
example, the so-called English lavender oil, considered by many to derive from L. angustifolia, is<br />
really, in the majority <strong>of</strong> cases, the hybrid lav<strong>and</strong>in (Denny, 1995, personal communication).<br />
Another pertinent point is how much twig <strong>and</strong> leaf material can be used in juniper berry oil? In<br />
Indonesia, it is common practice to space individual layers <strong>of</strong> patchouli leaves in the distillation<br />
vessel with twigs <strong>of</strong> the gurjun tree. Gurjun balsam present in the twigs contains an essential oil that<br />
contaminates the patchouli oil. Can this be considered to constitute an adulteration or simply a tool<br />
required for the production <strong>of</strong> the oil?<br />
4.1.16 CONCLUDING REMARKS<br />
As mentioned at the beginning, essential oils do have a future. In spite <strong>of</strong> regulatory limitations, dangerous<br />
substance regulations, <strong>and</strong> dermatological concerns as well as problems with pricing the world<br />
production <strong>of</strong> essentials oil will increase. <strong>Essential</strong> oils are used in a very large variety <strong>of</strong> fields. They<br />
are an integral constituent <strong>of</strong> fragrances used in perfumes <strong>and</strong> cosmetics <strong>of</strong> all kinds, skin s<strong>of</strong>teners to<br />
shower gels <strong>and</strong> body lotions, <strong>and</strong> even to “aromatherapy horse care massage oils.” They are widely
118 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
used in the ever-exp<strong>and</strong>ing areas <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy or, better, aromachology. Very large quantities <strong>of</strong><br />
natural essential oils are used by the food <strong>and</strong> flavor industries for the flavoring <strong>of</strong> smallgoods, fast<br />
foods, ice creams, beverages, both alcoholic as well as nonalcoholic s<strong>of</strong>t drinks, <strong>and</strong> so on. Their<br />
medicinal properties have been known for many years <strong>and</strong> even centuries. Some possess antibacterial<br />
or antifungal activity while others may assist with the digestion <strong>of</strong> food. However, as they are multicomponent<br />
mixtures <strong>of</strong> somewhat variable composition, the medicinal use <strong>of</strong> whole oils has contracted<br />
somewhat, the reason being that single essential oil constituents were easier to test for effectiveness<br />
<strong>and</strong> eventual side effects. Despite all that, the use <strong>of</strong> essential oils is still “number one” on the natural<br />
healing scene. With rising health care <strong>and</strong> medicine costs, self-medication is on the increase <strong>and</strong> with<br />
it a corresponding increase in the consumption <strong>of</strong> essential oils. Parallel to this, the increase in various<br />
esoteric movements is giving rise to further dem<strong>and</strong>s for pure natural essential oils.<br />
In the field <strong>of</strong> agriculture, attempts are being made at the identification <strong>of</strong> ecologically more<br />
friendly natural biocides, including essential oils, to replace synthetic pesticides <strong>and</strong> herbicides.<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils are also used to improve the appetite <strong>of</strong> farm animals, leading to more rapid increases<br />
in body weight as well as to improved digestion.<br />
Finally, some very cheap essential oils or oil components such as limonene, 1,8-cineole, <strong>and</strong> the<br />
pinenes are useful as industrial solvents while phell<strong>and</strong>rene-rich eucalyptus oil fractions are marketed<br />
as industrial perfumes for detergents <strong>and</strong> the like.<br />
In conclusion, a “golden future” can be predicted for that useful natural product: the “<strong>Essential</strong><br />
Oil”!<br />
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />
The author thanks first <strong>of</strong> all Dr. Erich Lassak for his tremendous support, for so many details information,<br />
<strong>and</strong> also for some pictures. Klaus Dürbeck for some information about production <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oils in development countries, Dr. Tilmann Miritz, Miritz Citrus Ingredients for Figures 4.4<br />
through 4.6, Bernhard Mirwald for Figure 4.9, <strong>and</strong> Tim Denny from Bridgestowe Estate, Lilydale,<br />
Tasmania for the Figures 4.20 through 4.23.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
25th International Symposium on <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, Aromatherapy Research: Studies on the Biological Effects <strong>of</strong><br />
Fragrance Compounds <strong>and</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> upon Inhalation, Grasse, France, 1994.<br />
Arnodou, J.F., 1991. The taste <strong>of</strong> nature; industrial methods <strong>of</strong> natural products extraction. Presented at a<br />
conference organized by the Royal Society <strong>of</strong> Chemistry in Canterbury, 16–19 July 1991.<br />
Court, W.A., R.C. Roy, R. Pocs, A.F. More, <strong>and</strong> P.H. White, 1993. Effects <strong>of</strong> harvest date on the yield <strong>and</strong> quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> peppermint. Can. J. Plant. Sci., 73: 815–824.<br />
Denny, T., 1995. Bridestowe estates. Tasmania, Private information to the author.<br />
Dey, D., Alberta government, Agriculture <strong>and</strong> Food. Available at http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/<br />
deptdocs.nsf/all/agdex122, July 2007.<br />
Figueiredo, A.C., J.G. Barroso, L.G. Pedro, <strong>and</strong> J.J.C. Scheffer, 2005. Physiological aspects <strong>of</strong> essential oil production.<br />
Plant Sci., 169(6): 1112–1117.<br />
Gildemeister, E., <strong>and</strong> F. H<strong>of</strong>fmann, 1931. Die Ätherische Öle. Miltitz: Verlag Schimmel & Co.<br />
ISO/DIS 4731: 2005. Oil <strong>of</strong> Geranium. Geneva: International St<strong>and</strong>ard Organisation.<br />
ISO/DIS 9235.2: 1997. Aromatic Natural Raw Materials—Vocabulary. Geneva: International St<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
Organisation.<br />
Kamatou, G.P.P., R.L. van Zyl, S.F. van Vuuren, A.M. Viljoen, A.C. Figueiredo, J.G. Barroso, L.G. Pedro, <strong>and</strong><br />
P.M. Tilney, 2006. Chemical composition, leaf trichome types <strong>and</strong> biological activities <strong>of</strong> the essential<br />
oils <strong>of</strong> four related salvia species indigenous to Southern Africa. J. Essent. Oil Res., 18 (Special edition):<br />
72–79.<br />
Karg, J.E., 1981. Das Geschäft mit ätherischen Ölen. Kosmetika, Aerosole, Riechst<strong>of</strong>fe, 54: 121–124.<br />
Koll, N. <strong>and</strong> W. Kowalczyk, 1957. Fachkunde der Parfümerie und Kosmetik. Leipzig: Fachbuchverlag.
Production <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 119<br />
Kosar, M., T. Özek, M. Kürkcüoglu, <strong>and</strong> K.H.C. Baser, 2007. Comparison <strong>of</strong> microwave-assisted hydrodistillation<br />
<strong>and</strong> hydrodistillation methods for the fruit essential oils <strong>of</strong> Foeniculum vulgare. J. Essent. Oil Res.,<br />
19: 426–429.<br />
Letchamo, W., R. Marquard, J. Hölzl, <strong>and</strong> A. Gosselin, 1994. The selection <strong>of</strong> Thymus vulgaris cultivars to<br />
grow in Canada. Angew<strong>and</strong>te Botanik, 68: 83–88.<br />
Levey, M. 1955. Evidences <strong>of</strong> ancient distillation, sublimation <strong>and</strong> extraction in Mesopotamia. Centaurus,<br />
Freiburg, 4(1): 23–33.<br />
Levey, M. 1959. Chemistry <strong>and</strong> Chemical <strong>Technology</strong> in Ancient Mesopotamia. Amsterdam: Elsevier.<br />
Meunier, C., 1985. Lav<strong>and</strong>es & Lav<strong>and</strong>ins. Aix-en-Provence: ÉDISUD.<br />
Nguyen, T.P.T., Nguyen, T.T., Tran, M.H., Tran, H.T., Muselli, A., Bighelli, A., Castola, V., <strong>and</strong> Casanova, J.,<br />
2004. Artemisia vulgaris L. from Vietnam, chemical variability <strong>and</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> the oil along the<br />
vegetative life <strong>of</strong> the plant. J. Essent. Oil Res., 16: 358–361.<br />
Novak, J., 2005. Lecture held on the 35th Int. Symp. on <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, Giardini Naxos, Sicily.<br />
Omidbaigi, R., 2005. Processing <strong>of</strong> essential oil plants. In Processing, Analysis <strong>and</strong> Application <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong><br />
<strong>Oils</strong>. Har Krishan Bhalla & Sons, Dehradun, India.<br />
Perfumer & Flavorist, 2009. A preliminary report on the world production <strong>of</strong> some selected essential oils <strong>and</strong><br />
countries, Vol. 34, January 2009.<br />
Porter, N., 2001. Crop <strong>and</strong> Food Research. Crop & Foodwatch Research, Christchurch, No. 39, October.<br />
Reeve, D., 2005. A cultivated zest, Perf. Flav. 30 (3): 32–35.<br />
Rovesti, P., 1977. Die Destillation ist 5000 Jahre alt. Dragoco Rep., 3: 49–62.<br />
Yanive, Z., <strong>and</strong> D. Palevitch, 1982. Effect <strong>of</strong> drought on the secondary metabolites <strong>of</strong> medicinal <strong>and</strong> aromatic<br />
plants. In: Cultivation <strong>and</strong> Utilization <strong>of</strong> Medicinal Plants, C.V. Atal <strong>and</strong> B.M. Kapur (eds). CSIR Jammu<br />
Tawi, India.<br />
Zahn, J., 1979. Nichts neues mehr seit Babylon. Hamburg: H<strong>of</strong>fmann und Campe.<br />
Ziegler, E., 1982. Die natürlichen und künstlichen Aromen, pp. 187–188. Heidelberg: Alfred Hüthig Verlag.
5<br />
Chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Charles Sell<br />
CONTENTS<br />
5.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 121<br />
5.2 Basic Biosynthetic Pathways ............................................................................................. 121<br />
5.3 Polyketides <strong>and</strong> Lipids ....................................................................................................... 123<br />
5.4 Shikimic Acid Derivatives ................................................................................................ 126<br />
5.5 Terpenoids ......................................................................................................................... 129<br />
5.5.1 Hemiterpenoids ..................................................................................................... 131<br />
5.5.2 Monoterpenoids ..................................................................................................... 131<br />
5.5.3 Sesquiterpenoids .................................................................................................... 135<br />
5.6 Synthesis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Components ............................................................................. 140<br />
References .................................................................................................................................. 149<br />
5.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
The term “essential oil” is a contraction <strong>of</strong> the original “quintessential oil.” This stems from the<br />
Aristotelian idea that matter is composed <strong>of</strong> four elements, namely, fire, air, earth, <strong>and</strong> water. The<br />
fifth element, or quintessence, was then considered to be spirit or life force. Distillation <strong>and</strong> evaporation<br />
were thought to be processes <strong>of</strong> removing the spirit from the plant <strong>and</strong> this is also reflected<br />
in our language since the term “spirits” is used to describe distilled alcoholic beverages such as<br />
br<strong>and</strong>y, whiskey, <strong>and</strong> eau de vie. The last <strong>of</strong> these again shows reference to the concept <strong>of</strong> removing<br />
the life force from the plant. Nowadays, <strong>of</strong> course, we know that, far from being spirit, essential oils<br />
are physical in nature <strong>and</strong> composed <strong>of</strong> complex mixtures <strong>of</strong> chemicals. One thing that we do see<br />
from the ancient concepts is that the chemical components <strong>of</strong> essential oils must be volatile since<br />
they are removed by distillation. In order to have boiling points low enough to enable distillation,<br />
<strong>and</strong> atmospheric pressure steam distillation in particular, the essential oil components need to have<br />
molecular weights below 300 Daltons (molecular mass relative to hydrogen = 1) <strong>and</strong> are usually<br />
fairly hydrophobic. Within these constraints, nature has provided an amazingly rich <strong>and</strong> diverse<br />
range <strong>of</strong> chemicals (Hay <strong>and</strong> Waterman, 1993; Lawrence, 1985) but there are patterns <strong>of</strong> molecular structure<br />
that give clues to how the molecules were constructed. These synthetic pathways have now been<br />
confirmed by experiment <strong>and</strong> will serve to provide a structure for the contents <strong>of</strong> this chapter.<br />
5.2 BASIC BIOSYNTHETIC PATHWAYS<br />
The chemicals produced by nature can be classified into two main groups. The primary metabolites<br />
are those that are universal across the plant <strong>and</strong> animal family <strong>and</strong> constitute the basic building<br />
blocks <strong>of</strong> life. The four subgroups <strong>of</strong> primary metabolites are proteins, carbohydrates, nucleic acids,<br />
<strong>and</strong> lipids. These families <strong>of</strong> chemicals contribute little to essential oils although some essential oil<br />
components are degradation products <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> these groups, lipids being the most significant. The<br />
121
122 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
secondary metabolites are those that occur in some species <strong>and</strong> not others <strong>and</strong> they are usually classified<br />
into terpenoids, shikimates, polyketides, <strong>and</strong> alkaloids. The most important as far as essential<br />
oils are concerned are the terpenoids <strong>and</strong> the shikimates are the second. There are a number <strong>of</strong><br />
polyketides <strong>of</strong> importance in essential oils but very few alkaloids. Terpenoids, shikimates, <strong>and</strong><br />
polyketides will therefore be the main focus <strong>of</strong> this chapter.<br />
The general scheme <strong>of</strong> biosynthetic reactions (Bu’Lock, 1965; Mann et al., 1994) is shown in<br />
Figure 5.1. Through photosynthesis, green plants convert carbon dioxide <strong>and</strong> water into glucose.<br />
Cleavage <strong>of</strong> glucose produces phosphoenolpyruvate (1), which is a key building block for the shikimate<br />
family <strong>of</strong> natural products. Decarboxylation <strong>of</strong> phosphoenolpyruvate gives the two-carbon unit<br />
<strong>of</strong> acetate <strong>and</strong> this is esterified with coenzyme-A to give acetyl CoA (2). Self-condensation <strong>of</strong> this<br />
species leads to the polyketides <strong>and</strong> lipids. Acetyl CoA is also a starting point for synthesis <strong>of</strong><br />
mevalonic acid (3), which is the key starting material for the terpenoids. In all <strong>of</strong> these reactions, <strong>and</strong><br />
indeed all the natural chemistry described in this chapter, Nature uses the same reactions that<br />
chemists do (Sell, 2003). However, nature’s reactions tend to be faster <strong>and</strong> more selective because <strong>of</strong><br />
the catalysts it uses. These catalysts are called enzymes <strong>and</strong> they are globular proteins in which an<br />
active site holds the reacting species together. This molecular organization in the active site lowers<br />
the activation energy <strong>of</strong> the reaction <strong>and</strong> directs its stereochemical course (Lehninger, 1993;<br />
Matthews <strong>and</strong> van Holde, 1990).<br />
Many enzymes need c<strong>of</strong>actors as reagents or energy providers. Coenzyme-A has already been<br />
mentioned above. It is a thiol <strong>and</strong> is used to form thioesters with carboxylic acids. This has two<br />
effects on the acid in question. Firstly, the thiolate anion is a better leaving group than alkoxide <strong>and</strong><br />
so the carbonyl carbon <strong>of</strong> the thioester is reactive toward nucleophiles. Secondly, the thioester group<br />
increases the acidity <strong>of</strong> the protons adjacent to the carbonyl group <strong>and</strong> therefore promotes the formation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the corresponding carbanions. In biosynthesis, a key role <strong>of</strong> adenosine triphosphate (ATP)<br />
is to make phosphate esters <strong>of</strong> alcohols (phosphorylation). One <strong>of</strong> the phosphate groups <strong>of</strong> ATP is<br />
added to the alcohol to give the corresponding phosphate ester <strong>and</strong> adenosine diphosphate (ADP).<br />
Another group <strong>of</strong> c<strong>of</strong>actors <strong>of</strong> importance to biosynthesis includes pairs such as NADP/NADPH,<br />
TPN/TPNH, <strong>and</strong> DPN/DPNH. These c<strong>of</strong>actors contain an N-alkylated pyridine ring. In each pair,<br />
one form comprises an N-alkylated pyridinium salt <strong>and</strong> the other the corresponding N-alkyl-1,4-<br />
dihydropyridine. The two forms in each pair are interconverted by gain or loss <strong>of</strong> a hydride anion<br />
<strong>and</strong> therefore constitute redox reagents. In all <strong>of</strong> the c<strong>of</strong>actors mentioned here, the reactive part <strong>of</strong><br />
Carbon dioxide<br />
+<br />
Water<br />
+<br />
Sunlight<br />
Glucose<br />
Green plants<br />
Glycolysis<br />
OP<br />
CO 2 –<br />
Phosphoenolpyruvate 1<br />
O P = OPO 2– 3<br />
O OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
Shikimic acid 4<br />
Lignans<br />
Coumarins<br />
Flavonoids<br />
Polyketides<br />
Lipids<br />
O<br />
O OH<br />
CoA<br />
HO<br />
Acetyl coenzyme A<br />
Mevalonic acid<br />
2 3<br />
OH<br />
Terpenoids<br />
FIGURE 5.1 General pattern <strong>of</strong> biosynthesis <strong>of</strong> secondary metabolites.
Chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 123<br />
the molecule is only a small part <strong>of</strong> the whole. However, the bulk <strong>of</strong> the molecule has an important<br />
role in molecular recognition. The c<strong>of</strong>actor docks into the active site <strong>of</strong> the enzyme through recognition<br />
<strong>and</strong> this holds the c<strong>of</strong>actor in the optimum spatial configuration relative to the substrate.<br />
5.3 POLYKETIDES AND LIPIDS<br />
The simplest biosynthetic pathway to appreciate is that <strong>of</strong> the polyketides <strong>and</strong> lipids (Bu’Lock, 1965;<br />
Mann et al., 1994). The key reaction sequence is shown in Figure 5.2. Acetyl CoA (2) is carboxylated<br />
to give malonyl CoA (5) <strong>and</strong> the anion <strong>of</strong> this attacks the CoA ester <strong>of</strong> a fatty acid. Obviously, the<br />
fatty acid could be acetic acid, making this a second molecule <strong>of</strong> acetyl CoA. After decarboxylation,<br />
the product is a b-ketoester with a backbone that is two-carbon atoms longer than the first fatty acid.<br />
Since this is the route by which fatty acids are produced, it explains why fatty acids are mostly even<br />
numbered. If the process is repeated with this new acid as the feedstock, it can be seen that various<br />
poly-oxo-acids can be built up, each <strong>of</strong> which will have a carbonyl group on every alternate carbon<br />
atom, hence the name polyketides. Alternatively, the ketone function can be reduced to the corresponding<br />
alcohol, <strong>and</strong> then eliminated, <strong>and</strong> the double bond hydrogenated. This sequence <strong>of</strong> reactions<br />
gives a higher homologue <strong>of</strong> the starting fatty acid, containing two more carbon atoms in the<br />
chain. Long chain fatty acids, whether saturated or unsaturated, are the basis <strong>of</strong> the lipids.<br />
There are three main paths by which components <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> other natural extracts are<br />
formed in this family <strong>of</strong> metabolites: condensation reactions <strong>of</strong> polyketides, degradation <strong>of</strong> lipids,<br />
<strong>and</strong> cyclization <strong>of</strong> arachidonic acid.<br />
Figure 5.3 shows how condensation <strong>of</strong> polyketides can lead to phenolic rings. Intramolecular<br />
aldol condensation <strong>of</strong> the tri-keto-octanoic acid <strong>and</strong> subsequent enolization leads to orsellinic acid<br />
(6). Polyketide phenols can be distinguished from the phenolic systems <strong>of</strong> the shikimates by the fact<br />
that the former usually retain evidence <strong>of</strong> oxygenation on alternate carbon atoms, either as acids,<br />
ketones, phenols, or as one end <strong>of</strong> a double bond. The most important natural products containing<br />
polyketide phenols are the extracts <strong>of</strong> oakmoss <strong>and</strong> treemoss (Evernia prunastrii). The most significant<br />
in odor terms is methyl 3-methylorsellinate (7) <strong>and</strong> ethyl everninate (8), which is usually also<br />
present in reasonable quantity. Atranol (9) <strong>and</strong> chloratranol (10) are minor components but they are<br />
skin sensitizers <strong>and</strong> so limit the usefulness <strong>of</strong> oakmoss <strong>and</strong> treemoss extracts, unless they are<br />
removed from them. Dimeric esters <strong>of</strong> orsellinic <strong>and</strong> everninic acids <strong>and</strong> analogues also exist in<br />
mosses. They are known as depsides <strong>and</strong> hydrolysis yields the monomers, thus increasing the odor<br />
<strong>of</strong> the sample. However, some depsides, such as atranorin (11), are allergens <strong>and</strong> thus contribute to<br />
safety issues with the extracts.<br />
O<br />
O<br />
–O<br />
CoA<br />
2 C<br />
2 5<br />
CoA<br />
R<br />
O<br />
CoA<br />
R<br />
O<br />
O<br />
CO 2 –<br />
CoA<br />
–CO 2<br />
O<br />
TPNH<br />
O<br />
–H 2 O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
DPNH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
R<br />
CoA<br />
R<br />
CoA<br />
R<br />
CoA<br />
R<br />
CoA<br />
etc.<br />
etc.<br />
FIGURE 5.2 Polyketide <strong>and</strong> lipid biosynthesis.
124 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
–<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
–H 2 O Enolise<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O O<br />
OH<br />
6<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O O<br />
O<br />
OH O<br />
OH O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
7 8 9 10<br />
Cl<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
11<br />
FIGURE 5.3 Polyketide biosynthesis <strong>and</strong> oakmoss components.<br />
The major metabolic route for fatty acids involves b-oxidation <strong>and</strong> cleavage giving acetate <strong>and</strong> a<br />
fatty acid with two carbon atoms less than the starting acid, that is, the reverse <strong>of</strong> the biosynthesis<br />
reaction. However, other oxidation routes also exist <strong>and</strong> these give rise to new metabolites that were<br />
not on the biosynthetic pathway. For example, Figure 5.4 shows how allylic oxidation <strong>of</strong> a dienoic<br />
acid <strong>and</strong> subsequent cleavage can lead to the formation <strong>of</strong> an aldehyde.<br />
Allylic oxidation followed by lactonization rather than cleavage can, obviously, lead to lactones.<br />
Reduction <strong>of</strong> the acid function to the corresponding alcohols or aldehydes is also possible as are<br />
hydrogenation <strong>and</strong> elimination reactions. Thus a wide variety <strong>of</strong> aliphatic entities are made available.<br />
Some examples are shown in Figure 5.5 to illustrate the diversity that exists. The hydrocarbon<br />
(E,Z)-1,3,5-undecatriene (12) is an important contributor to the odor <strong>of</strong> galbanum. Simple aliphatic<br />
alcohols <strong>and</strong> ethers are found, the occurrence <strong>of</strong> 1-octanol (13) in olibanum <strong>and</strong> methyl hexyl ether<br />
(14) in lavender being examples. Aldehydes are <strong>of</strong>ten found as significant odor components <strong>of</strong> oils,<br />
for example, decanal (15) in orange oil <strong>and</strong> (E)-4-decenal (16) caraway <strong>and</strong> cardamom. The ketone<br />
2-nonanone (17) that occurs in rue <strong>and</strong> hexyl propionate (18), a component <strong>of</strong> lavender, is just one<br />
<strong>of</strong> a plethora <strong>of</strong> esters that are found. The isomeric lactones g-decalactone (19) <strong>and</strong> d-decalactone<br />
(20) are found in osmanthus (<strong>Essential</strong>s <strong>Oils</strong> Database, n.d.). Acetylenes also occur as essential oil<br />
components, <strong>of</strong>ten as polyacetylenes such as methyl deca-2-en-4,6,8-triynoate (21), which is a component<br />
<strong>of</strong> Artemisia vulgaris.<br />
[O]<br />
R R' R R'<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
R<br />
+<br />
R'<br />
R<br />
R'<br />
FIGURE 5.4 Fragmentation <strong>of</strong> polyunsaturated fats to give aldehydes.
Chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 125<br />
OH<br />
13<br />
12<br />
O<br />
14<br />
15<br />
17<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
16<br />
18<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
19 20<br />
21<br />
O<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 5.5 Some lipid-derived components <strong>of</strong> essential oils.<br />
Arachidonic acid (22) is a polyunsaturated fatty acid that plays a special role as a synthetic intermediate<br />
in plants <strong>and</strong> animals (Mann et al., 1994). As shown in Figure 5.6, allylic oxidation at the<br />
11th carbon <strong>of</strong> the chain leads to the hydroperoxide (23). Further oxidation (at the 15th carbon) with<br />
two concomitant cyclization reactions gives the cyclic peroxide (24). This is a key intermediate for<br />
the biosynthesis <strong>of</strong> prostagl<strong>and</strong>ins such as 6-ketoprostagl<strong>and</strong>in F 1a (25) <strong>and</strong> also for methyl jasmonate<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
O O O<br />
O<br />
22<br />
O 23<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
25<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
24<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
26<br />
27<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 5.6 Biosynthesis <strong>of</strong> prostagl<strong>and</strong>ins <strong>and</strong> jasmines.
126 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
(26). The latter is the methyl ester <strong>of</strong> jasmonic acid, a plant hormone, <strong>and</strong> is a significant odor component<br />
<strong>of</strong> jasmine, as is jasmone (27), a product <strong>of</strong> degradation <strong>of</strong> jasmonic acid.<br />
5.4 SHIKIMIC ACID DERIVATIVES<br />
Shikimic acid (4) is a key synthetic intermediate for plants since it is the key precursor for both the<br />
flavonoids <strong>and</strong> lignin (Bu’Lock, 1965; Mann et al., 1994). The flavonoids are important to plants as<br />
antioxidants, colors, protective agents against ultraviolet light, <strong>and</strong> the like, <strong>and</strong> lignin is a key component<br />
<strong>of</strong> the structural materials <strong>of</strong> plants, especially woody tissues. Shikimic acid is synthesized<br />
from phosphoenol pyruvate (1) <strong>and</strong> erythrose-4 phosphate (28), as shown in Figure 5.7, <strong>and</strong> thus its<br />
biosynthesis starts from the carbohydrate pathway. Its derivatives can usually be recognized by the<br />
characteristic shikimate pattern <strong>of</strong> a six-membered ring with either a one- or three-carbon substituent<br />
on position 1 <strong>and</strong> oxygenation in the third, <strong>and</strong>/or fourth, <strong>and</strong>/or fifth positions. However, the<br />
oxygen atoms <strong>of</strong> the final products are not those <strong>of</strong> the starting shikimate since these are lost initially<br />
<strong>and</strong> then replaced.<br />
Figure 5.8 shows some <strong>of</strong> the biosynthetic intermediates stemming from shikimic acid (4) <strong>and</strong><br />
which are <strong>of</strong> importance in terms <strong>of</strong> generating materials volatile enough to be essential oil components.<br />
Elimination <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the ring alcohols <strong>and</strong> reaction with phosphoenol pyruvate (1) gives<br />
chorismic acid (29) that can undergo an oxy-Cope reaction to give prephenic acid. (30) Decarboxylation<br />
<strong>and</strong> elimination <strong>of</strong> the ring alcohol now gives the phenylpropionic acid skeleton. Amination <strong>and</strong><br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> the ketone function gives the essential amino acid phenylalanine (31) whereas reduction<br />
<strong>and</strong> elimination leads to cinnamic acid. (32) Ring hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> the latter gives the isomeric<br />
o- <strong>and</strong> p-coumaric acids, (33) <strong>and</strong> (34), respectively. Further hydroxylation gives caffeic acid (35)<br />
<strong>and</strong> methylation <strong>of</strong> this gives ferulic acid. (36) Oxidation <strong>of</strong> the methyl ether <strong>of</strong> the latter <strong>and</strong> subsequent<br />
cyclization gives methylenecaffeic acid (37). In shikimate biosynthesis, it is <strong>of</strong>ten possible to<br />
arrive at a given product by different sequences <strong>of</strong> the same reactions <strong>and</strong> the exact route used will<br />
depend on the genetic make-up <strong>of</strong> the plant.<br />
Aromatization <strong>of</strong> shikimic acid, without addition <strong>of</strong> the three additional carbon atoms from<br />
phosphoenolpyruvate, gives benzoic acid derivatives. Benzoic acid itself occurs in some oils <strong>and</strong> its<br />
esters are widespread. For example, methyl benzoate is found in tuberose, ylang ylang, <strong>and</strong> various<br />
lilies. Even more common are benzyl alcohol, benzaldehyde, <strong>and</strong> their derivatives (Arct<strong>and</strong>er, 1960;<br />
Phosphoenol pyruvate<br />
1<br />
PO CO2 H<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
CO 2 H<br />
TPN +<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
CO 2 H<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
CO 2 H<br />
O<br />
OP OH<br />
Erythrose-4 phosphate<br />
28<br />
OH<br />
OP OH<br />
Heptulosonic acid<br />
monophosphate<br />
OP<br />
OH<br />
TPN<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
CO 2 H CO 2 H HO CO 2 H O CO 2 H<br />
TPNH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
Shikimic acid<br />
4<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
5-Dehydroshikimic acid<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
5-Dehydroquinic acid<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 5.7 Biosynthesis <strong>of</strong> shikimic acid.
Chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 127<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
CO 2 H<br />
CO 2 H<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
4<br />
OH 29<br />
CO 2 H<br />
30<br />
OH<br />
31<br />
NH 2<br />
CO 2 H<br />
CO 2 H<br />
CO 2 H<br />
CO 2 H<br />
CO 2 H<br />
32<br />
O<br />
37<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
36<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
35<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
34<br />
OH<br />
33<br />
CO 2 H<br />
FIGURE 5.8 Key intermediates from shikimic acid.<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> Database, n.d.; Gildemeister <strong>and</strong> H<strong>of</strong>fmann, 1956; Günther, 1948). Benzyl alcohol<br />
occurs in muguet, jasmine, <strong>and</strong> narcissus, for example, <strong>and</strong> its acetate is the major component <strong>of</strong><br />
jasmine oils. The richest sources <strong>of</strong> benzaldehyde are almond <strong>and</strong> apricot kernels but it is also found<br />
in a wide range <strong>of</strong> flowers, including lilac, <strong>and</strong> other oils such as cassia <strong>and</strong> cinnamon. Hydroxylation<br />
or amination <strong>of</strong> benzoic acid leads to further series <strong>of</strong> natural products <strong>and</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the most significant,<br />
in terms <strong>of</strong> odors <strong>of</strong> essential oils, are shown in Figure 5.9. o-Hydroxybenzoic acid is known<br />
as salicylic acid (38) <strong>and</strong> both it <strong>and</strong> its esters are widely distributed in nature. For instance, methyl<br />
salicylate (39) is the major component (about 90% <strong>of</strong> the volatiles) <strong>of</strong> wintergreen <strong>and</strong> makes a significant<br />
contribution to the scents <strong>of</strong> tuberose <strong>and</strong> ylang ylang although only present at about 10%<br />
in the former <strong>and</strong> less than 1% in the latter. o-Aminobenzoic acid is known as anthranilic acid (40).<br />
Its methyl ester (41) has a very powerful odor <strong>and</strong> is found in such oils as genet, bitter orange flower,<br />
CO 2 H CO 2 H CO 2 H<br />
OH<br />
NH 2<br />
HO<br />
38 40<br />
43<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
39 41<br />
NH 2<br />
O<br />
44<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
42<br />
N<br />
H<br />
O<br />
45<br />
FIGURE 5.9 Hydroxy- <strong>and</strong> aminobenzoic acid derivatives.
128 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
tuberose, <strong>and</strong> jasmine. Dimethyl anthranilate (42), in which both the nitrogen <strong>and</strong> acid functions<br />
have been methylated, occurs at low levels in citrus oils. p-Hydroxybenzoic acid has been found in<br />
vanilla <strong>and</strong> orris but much more common is the methyl ester <strong>of</strong> the corresponding aldehyde, commonly<br />
known as anisaldehyde (44). As the name suggests, the latter one is an important component<br />
<strong>of</strong> anise <strong>and</strong> it is also found in oils such as lilac <strong>and</strong> the smoke <strong>of</strong> agar wood. The corresponding<br />
alcohol, anisyl alcohol (45), <strong>and</strong> its esters are also widespread components <strong>of</strong> essential oils.<br />
Indole (46) <strong>and</strong> 2-phenylethanol (47) are both shikimate derivatives. Indole is particularly associated<br />
with jasmine. It usually occurs in jasmine absolute at a level <strong>of</strong> about 3–5% <strong>and</strong> makes a very<br />
significant odor contribution to it. However, it does occur in many other essential oils as well.<br />
2-Phenylethanol occurs widely in plants <strong>and</strong> is especially important for rose where it usually<br />
accounts for one-third to three-quarters <strong>of</strong> the oil. The structures <strong>of</strong> both are shown in Figure 5.10.<br />
Figure 5.10 also shows some <strong>of</strong> the commonest cinnamic acid-derived essential oil components.<br />
Cinnamic acid (32) itself has been found in, for example, cassia <strong>and</strong> styrax but its esters, particularly<br />
the methyl ester, are more frequently encountered. The corresponding aldehyde, cinnamaldehyde<br />
(48), is a key component <strong>of</strong> cinnamon <strong>and</strong> cassia <strong>and</strong> also occurs in some other oils. Cinnamyl<br />
alcohol (49) <strong>and</strong> its esters are more widely distributed, occurring in narcissus, lilac, <strong>and</strong> a variety<br />
<strong>of</strong> other oils. Lactonization <strong>of</strong> o-coumaric acid (33) gives coumarin (50). This is found in new<br />
mown hay to which it gives the characteristic odor. It is also important in the odor pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> lavender<br />
<strong>and</strong> related species <strong>and</strong> occurs in a number <strong>of</strong> other oils. Bergapten (51) is a more highly oxygenated<br />
<strong>and</strong> substituted coumarin. The commonest source is bergamot oil but it also occurs in<br />
other sources, such as lime <strong>and</strong> parsley. It is phototoxic <strong>and</strong> consequently constitutes a safety issue<br />
for oils containing it.<br />
Oxygenation in the p-position <strong>of</strong> cinnamic acid followed by methylation <strong>of</strong> the phenol <strong>and</strong> reduction<br />
<strong>of</strong> the acid to alcohol with subsequent elimination <strong>of</strong> the alcohol gives estragole (also known as<br />
methylchavicol (52) <strong>and</strong> anethole (53). Estragole is found in a variety <strong>of</strong> oils, mostly herb oils such as<br />
basil, tarragon, chervil, fennel, clary sage, anise, <strong>and</strong> rosemary. Anethole occurs in both the (E)- <strong>and</strong><br />
(Z)-forms, the more thermodynamically stable (E)-isomer (shown in Figure 5.10) is the commoner,<br />
the (Z)-isomer is the more toxic <strong>of</strong> the two. Anethole is found in spices <strong>and</strong> herbs such as anise, fennel,<br />
lemon balm, cori<strong>and</strong>er, <strong>and</strong> basil <strong>and</strong> also in flower oils such as ylang ylang <strong>and</strong> lavender.<br />
OH<br />
46<br />
N<br />
H<br />
47<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
48<br />
49<br />
O<br />
50<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
51<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
52<br />
O<br />
53<br />
FIGURE 5.10 Some shikimate essential oil components.
Chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 129<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
53 54<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
55<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
56<br />
O<br />
57 O<br />
58<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
59 60<br />
O<br />
O<br />
61<br />
FIGURE 5.11 Ferulic acid derivatives.<br />
Reduction <strong>of</strong> the side chain <strong>of</strong> ferulic acid (36) leads to an important family <strong>of</strong> essential oil components,<br />
shown in Figure 5.11. The key material is eugenol (53), which is widespread in its occurrence.<br />
It is found in spices such as clove, cinnamon, <strong>and</strong> allspice, herbs such as bay <strong>and</strong> basil, <strong>and</strong> in<br />
flower oils including rose, jasmine, <strong>and</strong> carnation. Isoeugenol (54) is found in basil, cassia, clove,<br />
nutmeg, <strong>and</strong> ylang ylang. Oxidative cleavage <strong>of</strong> the side chain <strong>of</strong> shikimates to give benzaldehyde<br />
derivatives is common <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten significant, as it is in this case, where the product is vanillin (55).<br />
Vanillin is the key odor component <strong>of</strong> vanilla <strong>and</strong> is therefore <strong>of</strong> considerable commercial importance.<br />
It also occurs in other sources such as jasmine, cabreuva, <strong>and</strong> the smoke <strong>of</strong> agar wood. The<br />
methyl ether <strong>of</strong> eugenol, methyleugenol (56), is very widespread in nature, which, since it is the subject<br />
<strong>of</strong> some toxicological safety issues, creates difficulties for the essential oils business. The oils<br />
<strong>of</strong> some Melaleuca species contain up to 98% methyleugenol <strong>and</strong> it is found in a wide range <strong>of</strong> species<br />
including pimento, bay, tarragon, basil, <strong>and</strong> rose. The isomer, methylisoeugenol (57), occurs as<br />
both (E)- <strong>and</strong> (Z)-isomers, the former being slightly commoner. Typical sources include calamus,<br />
citronella, <strong>and</strong> some narcissus species. Oxidative cleavage <strong>of</strong> the side chain in this set <strong>of</strong> substances<br />
produces veratraldehyde (58), a relatively rare natural product. Formation <strong>of</strong> the methylenedioxy<br />
ring, via methylenecaffeic acid (37), gives safrole (59), the major component <strong>of</strong> sassafras oil. The<br />
toxicity <strong>of</strong> safrole has led to a ban on the use <strong>of</strong> sassafras oil by the perfumery industry. Isosafrole<br />
(60) is found relatively infrequently in nature. The corresponding benzaldehyde derivative, heliotropin<br />
(61), also known as piperonal, is the major component <strong>of</strong> heliotrope.<br />
5.5 TERPENOIDS<br />
The terpenoids are, by far, the most important group <strong>of</strong> natural products as far as essential oils are<br />
concerned. Some authors, particularly in older literature, refer to them as terpenes but this term is<br />
nowadays restricted to the monoterpenoid hydrocarbons. They are defined as substances composed<br />
<strong>of</strong> isoprene (2-methylbutadiene) units. Isoprene (62) is not <strong>of</strong>ten found in essential oils <strong>and</strong> is not<br />
actually an intermediate in biosynthesis, but the 2-methylbutane skeleton is easily discernable in<br />
ter penoids. Figure 5.12 shows the structures <strong>of</strong> some terpenoids. In the case <strong>of</strong> geraniol (63), one end<br />
<strong>of</strong> one isoprene unit is joined to the end <strong>of</strong> another making a linear structure (2,6-dimethyloctane). In<br />
guaiol (64), there are three isoprene units joined together to make a molecule with two rings. It is easy<br />
to envisage how the three units were first joined together into a chain <strong>and</strong> then formation <strong>of</strong> bonds<br />
from one point in the chain to another produced the two rings. Similarly, two isoprene units were<br />
used to form the bicyclic structure <strong>of</strong> a-pinene (65).<br />
The direction <strong>of</strong> coupling <strong>of</strong> isoprene units is almost always in one direction, the so-called headto-tail<br />
coupling. This is shown in Figure 5.13. The branched end <strong>of</strong> the chain is referred to as the<br />
head <strong>of</strong> the molecule <strong>and</strong> the other as the tail.
130 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
62<br />
63<br />
64<br />
OH<br />
65<br />
FIGURE 5.12 Isoprene units in some common terpenoids.<br />
Head<br />
Head<br />
Tail<br />
Tail<br />
FIGURE 5.13 Head-to-tail coupling <strong>of</strong> two isoprene units.<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
Mn 2+<br />
OH<br />
O P P O P P<br />
Mg 2+<br />
3 66 67<br />
67<br />
66<br />
O<br />
P P<br />
H<br />
_ base<br />
O<br />
P P<br />
O<br />
P P<br />
O<br />
66 P P<br />
H<br />
_ base<br />
etc.<br />
68<br />
FIGURE 5.14 Coupling <strong>of</strong> C5 units in terpenoid biosynthesis.<br />
This pattern <strong>of</strong> coupling is explained by the biosynthesis <strong>of</strong> terpenoids (Bu’Lock, 1965; Croteau,<br />
1987; Mann et al., 1994). The key intermediate is mevalonic acid (3), which is made from three<br />
molecules <strong>of</strong> acetyl CoA (2). Phosphorylation <strong>of</strong> mevalonic acid followed by elimination <strong>of</strong> the<br />
tertiary alcohol <strong>and</strong> concomitant decarboxylation <strong>of</strong> the adjacent acid group gives isopentenyl pyrophosphate<br />
(66). This can be isomerized to give prenyl pyrophosphate (67). Coupling <strong>of</strong> these two<br />
5-carbon units gives a 10-carbon unit, geranyl pyrophosphate (68), as shown in Figure 5.14 <strong>and</strong><br />
further additions <strong>of</strong> isopentenyl pyrophosphate (66) lead to 15-, 20-, 25-, <strong>and</strong> so on carbon units.<br />
It is clear from the mechanism shown in Figure 5.14 that terpenoid structures will always contain<br />
a multiple <strong>of</strong> five carbon atoms when they are first formed. The first terpenoids to be studied contained<br />
10 carbon atoms per molecule <strong>and</strong> were called monoterpenoids. This nomenclature has<br />
remained <strong>and</strong> so those with five carbon atoms are known as hemiterpenoids, those with 15, sesquiterpenoids,<br />
<strong>and</strong> those with 20, diterpenoids, <strong>and</strong> so on. In general, only the hemiterpenoids, monoterpenoids,<br />
<strong>and</strong> sesquiterpenoids are sufficiently volatile to be components <strong>of</strong> essential oils. Degradation<br />
products <strong>of</strong> higher terpenoids do occur in essential oils, so they will be included in this chapter.
Chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 131<br />
5.5.1 HEMITERPENOIDS<br />
Many alcohols, aldehydes, <strong>and</strong> esters, with a 2-methylbutane skeleton, occur as minor components<br />
in essential oils. Not surprisingly, in view <strong>of</strong> the biosynthesis, the commonest oxidation pattern is<br />
that <strong>of</strong> prenol, that is, 3-methylbut-2-ene-1-ol. For example, the acetate <strong>of</strong> this alcohol occurs in<br />
ylang ylang <strong>and</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> other oils. However, oxidation has been observed at all positions.<br />
Esters such as prenyl acetate give fruity top notes to oils containing them <strong>and</strong> the corresponding<br />
thioesters contribute to the characteristic odor <strong>of</strong> galbanum.<br />
5.5.2 MONOTERPENOIDS<br />
Geranyl pyrophosphate (68) is the precursor for the monoterpenoids. Heterolysis <strong>of</strong> its carbon–<br />
oxygen bond gives the geranyl carbocation (69). In natural systems, this <strong>and</strong> other carbocations<br />
discussed in this chapter do not exist as free ions but rather as incipient carbocations held in enzyme<br />
active sites <strong>and</strong> essentially prompted into cation reactions by the approach <strong>of</strong> a suitable reagent. For<br />
the sake <strong>of</strong> simplicity, they will be referred to here as carbocations. The reactions are described in<br />
chemical terms but all are under enzymic control <strong>and</strong> the enzymes present in any given plant will<br />
determine the terpenoids it will produce. Thus essential oil composition can give information about<br />
the genetic make-up <strong>of</strong> the plant. A selection <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the key biosynthetic routes to monoterpenoids<br />
(Devon <strong>and</strong> Scott, 1972) is shown in Figure 5.15.<br />
+<br />
OH<br />
70<br />
69<br />
63<br />
O<br />
71<br />
73<br />
72<br />
77<br />
+<br />
65<br />
+<br />
76<br />
OH<br />
74<br />
75<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
+<br />
+<br />
O<br />
80 79<br />
78<br />
81 82<br />
FIGURE 5.15 Formation <strong>of</strong> monoterpenoid skeletons.
132 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Reaction <strong>of</strong> the geranyl carbocation with water gives geraniol (63) that can subsequently be oxidized<br />
to citral (71). Loss <strong>of</strong> a proton from (69) gives myrcene (70) <strong>and</strong> this can be isomerized to<br />
other acyclic hydrocarbons. An intramolecular electrophilic addition reaction <strong>of</strong> (69) gives the<br />
monocyclic carbocation (72) that can eliminate a proton to give limonene (73) or add water to give<br />
a-terpineol (74). A second intramolecular addition gives the pinyl carbocation (75) that can lose a<br />
proton to give either a-pinene (65) or b-pinene (76). The pinyl carbocation (75) is also reachable<br />
directly from the menthyl carbocation (72). Carene (77), another bicyclic material, can be produced<br />
through similar reactions. Wagner–Meerwein rearrangement <strong>of</strong> the pinyl carbocation (75) gives the<br />
bornyl carbocation (78). Addition <strong>of</strong> water to this gives borneol (79) <strong>and</strong> this can be oxidized to<br />
camphor (80). An alternative Wagner–Meerwein rearrangement <strong>of</strong> (75) gives the fenchyl skeleton<br />
(81) from which fenchone (82) is derived.<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the more commonly encountered monoterpenoid hydrocarbons (Arct<strong>and</strong>er, 1960;<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> Database, n.d.; Gildemeister <strong>and</strong> H<strong>of</strong>fmann, 1956; Günther, 1948; Sell, 2007) are<br />
shown in Figure 5.16. Many <strong>of</strong> these can be formed by dehydration <strong>of</strong> alcohols <strong>and</strong> so their presence<br />
in essential oils could be as artifacts arising from the extraction process. Similarly, p-cymene (83)<br />
is one <strong>of</strong> the most stable materials <strong>of</strong> this class <strong>and</strong> can be formed from many <strong>of</strong> the others by appropriate<br />
cyclization <strong>and</strong>/or isomerization <strong>and</strong>/or oxidation reactions <strong>and</strong> so its presence in any essential<br />
oil could be as an artifact.<br />
Myrcene (70) is very widespread in nature. Some sources, such as hops, contain high levels <strong>and</strong><br />
it is found in most <strong>of</strong> the common herbs <strong>and</strong> spices. All isomers <strong>of</strong> a-ocimene (84), b-ocimene (85),<br />
<strong>and</strong> allo-ocimene (86) are found in essential oils, the isomers <strong>of</strong> b-ocimene (85) being the most<br />
frequently encountered. Limonene (73) is present in many essential oils but the major occurrence is<br />
in the citrus oils that contain levels up to 90%. These oils contain the dextrorotatory (R)-enantiomer,<br />
<strong>and</strong> its antipode is much less common. Both a-phell<strong>and</strong>rene (87) <strong>and</strong> b-phell<strong>and</strong>rene (88) occur<br />
widely in essential oils. For example, (−)-a-phell<strong>and</strong>rene is found in Eucalyptus dives <strong>and</strong> (S)-(−)-<br />
b-phell<strong>and</strong>rene in the lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta. p-Cymene (83) has been identified in many<br />
essential oils <strong>and</strong> plant extracts <strong>and</strong> thyme <strong>and</strong> oregano oils are particularly rich in it. a-Pinene (65),<br />
70 84 85 86<br />
73 87 88<br />
83<br />
65 76 77<br />
89<br />
FIGURE 5.16 Some <strong>of</strong> the more common terpenoid hydrocarbons.
Chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 133<br />
b-pinene (76), <strong>and</strong> 3-carene (77) are all major constituents <strong>of</strong> turpentine from a wide range <strong>of</strong> pines,<br />
spruces, <strong>and</strong> firs. The pinenes are <strong>of</strong>ten found in other oils, 3-carene less so. Like the pinenes, camphene<br />
(89) is widespread in nature.<br />
Simple hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> geranyl pyrophosphate gives geraniol, (E)-3,7-dimethylocta-2,6-dienol (63).<br />
This is <strong>of</strong>ten accompanied in nature by its geometric isomer, nerol (90). Synthetic material is usually<br />
a mixture <strong>of</strong> the two isomers <strong>and</strong> when interconversion is possible, the equilibrium mixture<br />
comprises about 60% geraniol (63) <strong>and</strong> 40% nerol (90). The name geraniol is <strong>of</strong>ten used to describe<br />
a mixture <strong>of</strong> geraniol <strong>and</strong> nerol. When specifying the geometry <strong>of</strong> these alcohols it is better to use<br />
the modern (E)/(Z) nomenclature as the terms cis <strong>and</strong> trans are somewhat ambiguous in this case<br />
<strong>and</strong> earlier literature is not consistent in their use. Both isomers occur in a wide range <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oils, geraniol (63) being particularly widespread. The oil <strong>of</strong> Monarda fi stulosa contains over 90%<br />
geraniol (63) <strong>and</strong> the level in palmarosa is over 80%. Geranium contains about 50% <strong>and</strong> citronella<br />
<strong>and</strong> lemongrass each contain about 30%. The richest natural sources <strong>of</strong> nerol include rose, palmarosa,<br />
citronella, <strong>and</strong> davana although its level in these is usually only in the 10–15% range. Citronella<br />
<strong>and</strong> related species are used commercially as sources <strong>of</strong> geraniol but the price is much higher than<br />
that <strong>of</strong> synthetic material. Citronellol (91) is a dihydrogeraniol <strong>and</strong> occurs widely in nature in both<br />
enantiomeric forms. Rose, geranium, <strong>and</strong> citronella are the oils with the highest levels <strong>of</strong> citronellol.<br />
Geraniol, nerol, <strong>and</strong> citronellol, together with 2-phenylethanol, are known as the rose alcohols<br />
because <strong>of</strong> their occurrence in rose oils <strong>and</strong> also because they are the key materials responsible for<br />
the rose odor character. Esters (the acetates in particular) <strong>of</strong> all these alcohols are also commonly<br />
encountered in essential oils (Figure 5.17).<br />
Allylic hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> geranyl pyrophosphate produces linalool (92). Like geraniol, linalool occurs<br />
widely in nature. The richest source is Ho leaf, the oil <strong>of</strong> which can contain well over 90% linalool.<br />
Other rich sources include linaloe, rosewood, cori<strong>and</strong>er, freesia, <strong>and</strong> honeysuckle. Its acetate is also<br />
frequently encountered <strong>and</strong> is a significant contributor to the odors <strong>of</strong> lavender <strong>and</strong> citrus leaf oils.<br />
Figure 5.18 shows a selection <strong>of</strong> cyclic monoterpenoid alcohols. a-Terpineol (74) is found in<br />
many essential oils as is its acetate. The isomeric terpinen-4-ol (93) is an important component <strong>of</strong><br />
Ti tree oil but its acetate, surprisingly, is more widely occurring, being found in herbs such as marjoram<br />
<strong>and</strong> rosemary. l-Menthol (94) is found in various mints <strong>and</strong> is responsible for the cooling<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> oils containing it. There are eight stereoisomers <strong>of</strong> the menthol structure, l-menthol is the<br />
commonest in nature <strong>and</strong> also has the strongest cooling effect. The cooling effect makes menthol<br />
<strong>and</strong> mint oils valuable commodities, the two most important sources being cornmint (Mentha<br />
arvensis) <strong>and</strong> peppermint (Mentha piperita). Isopulegol (95) occurs in some species including<br />
Eucalyptus citriodora <strong>and</strong> citronella. Borneol (endo-1,7,7-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-ol) (79)<br />
<strong>and</strong> esters there<strong>of</strong>, particularly the acetate, occur in many essential oils. Isoborneol (exo-1,7,7-<br />
trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-ol) (96) is less common; however, isoborneol <strong>and</strong> its esters are<br />
found in quite a number <strong>of</strong> oils. Thymol (97), being a phenol, possesses antimicrobial properties,<br />
<strong>and</strong> oils, such as thyme <strong>and</strong> basil, which find appropriate use in herbal remedies. It is also found in<br />
various Ocimum <strong>and</strong> Monarda species.<br />
Three monoterpenoid ethers are shown in Figure 5.19. 1,8-Cineole (98), more commonly referred<br />
to simply as cineole, comprises up to 95% <strong>of</strong> the oil <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus globulus <strong>and</strong> about 40–50% <strong>of</strong><br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
63 90 91 92<br />
FIGURE 5.17 Key acyclic monoterpenoid alcohols.
134 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
74 93 94 95<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
79<br />
96<br />
97<br />
FIGURE 5.18 Some cyclic monoterpenoid alcohol.<br />
Cajeput oil. It also can be found in an extensive range <strong>of</strong> other oils <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten as a major component.<br />
It has antibacterial <strong>and</strong> decongestant properties <strong>and</strong> consequently, eucalyptus oil is used in various<br />
paramedical applications. Menth<strong>of</strong>uran (99) occurs in mint oils <strong>and</strong> contributes to the odor <strong>of</strong> peppermint.<br />
It is also found in several other oils. Rose oxide is found predominantly in rose <strong>and</strong> geranium<br />
oils. There are four isomers, the commonest being the laevorotatory enantiomer <strong>of</strong> cis-rose<br />
oxide (100). This is also the isomer with the lowest odor threshold <strong>of</strong> the four.<br />
The two most significant monoterpene aldehydes are citral (71) <strong>and</strong> its dihydro analogue citronellal<br />
(103), both <strong>of</strong> which are shown in Figure 5.20. The word citral is used to describe a mixture<br />
<strong>of</strong> the two geometric isomers geranial (101) <strong>and</strong> neral (102) without specifying their relative proportions.<br />
Citral occurs widely in nature, both isomers usually being present, the ratio between them<br />
usually being in the 40:60 to 60:40 range. Lemongrass contains 70–90% citral <strong>and</strong> the fruit <strong>of</strong><br />
Litsea cubeba contains about 60–75%. Citral also occurs in Eucalyptus staigeriana, lemon balm,<br />
ginger, basil, rose, <strong>and</strong> citrus species. It is responsible for the characteristic smell <strong>of</strong> lemons although<br />
lemon oil usually contains only a few percent <strong>of</strong> it. Citronellal (103) also occurs widely in essential<br />
oils. Eucalyptus citriodora contains up to 85% citronellal <strong>and</strong> significant amounts are also found in<br />
some chemotypes <strong>of</strong> Litsea cubeba, citronella Swangi leaf oil, <strong>and</strong> Backhousia citriodora. Campholenic<br />
aldehyde (104) occurs in a limited range <strong>of</strong> species such as olibanum, styrax, <strong>and</strong> some eucalypts.<br />
Material produced from a-pinene (65) is important as an intermediate for synthesis.<br />
Figure 5.21 shows some <strong>of</strong> the commoner monoterpenoid ketones found in essential oils. Both<br />
enantiomers <strong>of</strong> carvone are found in nature, the (R)-(−)- (usually referred to as l-carvone) (105)<br />
being the commoner. This enantiomer provides the characteristic odor <strong>of</strong> spearmint (Mentha<br />
cardiaca, Mentha gracilis, Mentha spicata, <strong>and</strong> Mentha viridis), the oil <strong>of</strong> which usually contains<br />
55–75% <strong>of</strong> l-carvone. The (S)-(+)-enantiomer (106) is found in caraway at levels <strong>of</strong> 30–65% <strong>and</strong><br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 5.19 Some monoterpenoid ethers.<br />
98 99 100
Chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 135<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
101 102 103 104<br />
FIGURE 5.20 Some monoterpenoid aldehydes.<br />
in dill at 50–75%. Menthone is fairly common in essential oils particularly in the mints, pennyroyal,<br />
<strong>and</strong> sages but lower levels are also found in oils such as rose <strong>and</strong> geranium. The l-isomer is<br />
commoner than the d-isomer. Isomenthone is the cis-isomer <strong>and</strong> the two interconvert readily by<br />
epimerization. The equilibrium mixture comprises about 70% menthone <strong>and</strong> 30% isomenthone.<br />
The direction <strong>of</strong> rotation <strong>of</strong> plane-polarized light reverses on epimerization <strong>and</strong> therefore l-menthone<br />
(107) gives d-isomenthone (108). (+)-Pulegone (109) accounts for about 75% <strong>of</strong> the oil <strong>of</strong><br />
pennyroyal <strong>and</strong> is also found in a variety <strong>of</strong> other oils. (−)-Piperitone (110) also occurs in a variety<br />
<strong>of</strong> oils, the richest source being Eucalyptus dives. Both pulegone <strong>and</strong> piperitone have strong minty<br />
odors. Camphor (80) occurs in many essential oils <strong>and</strong> in both enantiomeric forms. The richest<br />
source is the oil <strong>of</strong> camphor wood but it is also an important contributor to the odor <strong>of</strong> lavender <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> herbs such as sage <strong>and</strong> rosemary. Fenchone (82) occurs widely, for example, in cedar leaf <strong>and</strong><br />
lavender. Its laevorotatory enantiomer is an important contributor to the odor <strong>of</strong> fennel.<br />
5.5.3 SESQUITERPENOIDS<br />
By definition, sesquiterpenoids contain 15 carbon atoms. This results in their having lower volatilities<br />
<strong>and</strong> hence higher boiling points than monoterpenoids. Therefore, fewer <strong>of</strong> them (in percentage terms)<br />
contribute to the odor <strong>of</strong> essential oils but those that do <strong>of</strong>ten have low-odor thresholds <strong>and</strong> contribute<br />
significantly as end notes. They are also important as fixatives for more volatile components.<br />
Just as geraniol (63) is the precursor for all the monoterpenoids, farnesol (111) is the precursor<br />
for all the sesquiterpenoids. Its pyrophosphate is synthesized in nature by the addition <strong>of</strong> isopentenyl<br />
pyrophosphate (66) to geranyl pyrophosphate (68) as shown in Figure 5.14 <strong>and</strong> hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> that<br />
gives farnesol. Incipient heterolysis <strong>of</strong> the carbon–oxygen bond <strong>of</strong> the phosphate gives the nascent<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
105 106 107 108<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
109 110<br />
80<br />
82<br />
FIGURE 5.21 Some monoterpenoid ketones.
136 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
farnesyl carbocation (112) <strong>and</strong> this leads to the other sesquiterpenoids, just as the geranyl carbocation<br />
does to monoterpenoids. Starting from farnesyl pyrophosphate, the variety <strong>of</strong> possible cyclic<br />
structures is much greater than that from geranyl pyrophosphate because there are now three double<br />
bonds in the molecule. Similarly, there is also a greater scope for further structural variation resulting<br />
from rearrangements, oxidations, degradation, <strong>and</strong> so on (Devon <strong>and</strong> Scott, 1972). The geometry<br />
<strong>of</strong> the double bond in position 2 <strong>of</strong> farnesol is important in terms <strong>of</strong> determining the pathway<br />
used for subsequent cyclization reactions <strong>and</strong> so these are best discussed in two blocks.<br />
Figure 5.22 shows a tiny fraction <strong>of</strong> the biosynthetic pathways derived from (Z,E)-farnesyl pyrophosphate.<br />
Direct hydrolysis leads to acyclic sesquiterpenoids such as farnesol (111) <strong>and</strong> nerolidol<br />
(113). However, capture <strong>of</strong> the carbocation (112) by the double bond at position 6 gives a cyclic structure<br />
that <strong>of</strong> the bisabolane skeleton (114) <strong>and</strong> quenching <strong>of</strong> this with water gives bisabolol (115). A<br />
hydrogen shift in (114) leads to the isomeric carbocation (116) that still retains the bisabolane skeleton.<br />
Further cyclizations <strong>and</strong> rearrangements take the molecule through various skeletons, including<br />
those <strong>of</strong> the acorane (117) <strong>and</strong> cedrane (118) families, to the khusane family, illustrated by khusimol<br />
(119) in the figure. Obviously, a wide variety <strong>of</strong> materials can be generated along this route, an<br />
example being cedrol (120) formed by reaction <strong>of</strong> cation (118) with water. The bisabolyl carbocation<br />
(114) can also cyclize to the other double bonds in the molecule leading to, inter alia, the campherenane<br />
skeleton (121) <strong>and</strong> hence a-santalol (122) <strong>and</strong> b-santalol (123), or, via the cuparane (124) <strong>and</strong><br />
chamigrane (125) skeletons, to compounds such as thujopsene (126). The carbocation function in<br />
128<br />
+<br />
127<br />
+<br />
112<br />
OH<br />
115<br />
+<br />
+<br />
124<br />
+<br />
114<br />
121<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+ +<br />
129<br />
116<br />
HO<br />
122 123<br />
HO<br />
+<br />
+<br />
130<br />
125<br />
+<br />
117<br />
OH<br />
+<br />
+<br />
119<br />
+<br />
131<br />
126<br />
OH<br />
118<br />
+<br />
120<br />
FIGURE 5.22 Some biosynthetic pathways from (Z,E)-farnesol.
Chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 137<br />
(112) can also add to the double bond at the far end <strong>of</strong> the chain to give the cis-humulane skeleton<br />
(127). This species can cyclize back to the double bond at carbon 2 before losing a proton, thus<br />
giving caryophyllene (128). Another alternative is for a series <strong>of</strong> hydrogen shifts, cyclizations,<br />
<strong>and</strong> rearrangements to lead it through the himachalane (129) <strong>and</strong> longibornane (130) skeletons to<br />
longifolene (131).<br />
Figure 5.23 shows a few <strong>of</strong> the many possibilities for biosynthesis <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenoids from<br />
(E,E)-farnesyl pyrophosphate. Cyclization <strong>of</strong> the cation (132) to C-11, followed by loss <strong>of</strong> a proton<br />
gives all trans- or a-humulene (133), whereas cyclization to the other end <strong>of</strong> the same double bond<br />
gives a carbocation (134) with the germacrane skeleton. This is an intermediate in the biosynthesis<br />
<strong>of</strong> odorous sesquiterpenes such as nootkatone (135) <strong>and</strong> a-vetivone (137). b-Vetivone (137) is synthesized<br />
through a route that also produces various alcohols, for example, (138) <strong>and</strong> (139), <strong>and</strong> an<br />
ether (140) that has the eudesmane skeleton. Rearrangement <strong>of</strong> the germacrane carbocation (134)<br />
leads to a carbocation (141) with the guaiane skeleton <strong>and</strong> this is an intermediate in the synthesis <strong>of</strong><br />
guaiol (142). Carbocation (141) is also an intermediate in the biosynthesis <strong>of</strong> the a-patchoulane<br />
(143) <strong>and</strong> b-patchoulane (144) skeletons <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> patchouli alcohol (145).<br />
O<br />
135<br />
+<br />
132 133<br />
O<br />
136<br />
+<br />
134 142<br />
OH<br />
+<br />
+<br />
138<br />
OH<br />
144<br />
141<br />
+<br />
HO<br />
139<br />
O<br />
140<br />
143<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
137<br />
145<br />
FIGURE 5.23 Some biosynthetic pathways from (E,E)-farnesol.
138 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
All four isomers <strong>of</strong> farnesol (111) are found in nature <strong>and</strong> all have odors in the muguet <strong>and</strong> linden<br />
direction. The commonest is the (E,E)-isomer that occurs in, among others, cabreuva <strong>and</strong> ambrette<br />
seed while the (Z,E)-isomer has been found in jasmine <strong>and</strong> ylang, the (E,Z)-isomer in cabreuva,<br />
rose, <strong>and</strong> neroli, <strong>and</strong> the (Z,Z)-isomer in rose. Nerolidol (113) is the allylic isomer <strong>of</strong> farnesol <strong>and</strong><br />
exists in four isomeric forms, namely, two enantiomers each <strong>of</strong> two geometric isomers. The<br />
(E)-isomer has been found in cabreuva, niaouli, <strong>and</strong> neroli oils among others <strong>and</strong> the (Z)-isomer in<br />
neroli, jasmine, ho leaf, <strong>and</strong> so on. Figure 5.24 shows the structures <strong>of</strong> farnesol <strong>and</strong> nerolidol with<br />
all <strong>of</strong> the double bonds in the trans-configuration.<br />
a-Bisabolol (115) is the simplest <strong>of</strong> the cyclic sesquiterpenoid alcohols. If farnesol is the sesquiterpenoid<br />
equivalent <strong>of</strong> geraniol <strong>and</strong> nerolidol <strong>of</strong> linalool, then a-bisabolol is the equivalent <strong>of</strong><br />
a-terpineol. It has two chiral centers <strong>and</strong> therefore exists in four stereoisomeric forms, all <strong>of</strong> which<br />
occur in nature. The richest natural source is Myoporum crassifolium Forst., a shrub from New<br />
Caledonia, but a-bisabolol can be found in many other species including chamomile, lavender, <strong>and</strong><br />
rosemary. It has a faint floral odor <strong>and</strong> anti-inflammatory properties <strong>and</strong> is responsible, at least in<br />
part, for the related medicinal properties <strong>of</strong> chamomile oil.<br />
The santalols (122) <strong>and</strong> (123) have more complex structures <strong>and</strong> are the principal components <strong>of</strong><br />
s<strong>and</strong>alwood oil. Cedrol (120) is another complex alcohol but it is more widely occurring in nature<br />
than the santalols. It is found in a wide range <strong>of</strong> species, the most significant being trees <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Juniperus, Cupressus, <strong>and</strong> Thuja families. Cedrene (146) occurs alongside cedrol in cedarwood<br />
oils. Cedrol is dehydrated to cedrene in the presence <strong>of</strong> acid <strong>and</strong> so the latter can be an artifact <strong>of</strong><br />
the former <strong>and</strong> the ratio <strong>of</strong> the two will <strong>of</strong>ten depend on the method <strong>of</strong> isolation. Thujopsene (126)<br />
also occurs in cedarwood oils, usually at a similar level to that <strong>of</strong> cedrol/cedrene, <strong>and</strong> it is found in<br />
various other oils also. Caryophyllene (128) <strong>and</strong> a-humulene (the all trans isomer) (133) are widespread<br />
in nature, cloves being the best-known source <strong>of</strong> the former <strong>and</strong> hops <strong>of</strong> the latter. The ring<br />
systems <strong>of</strong> these two materials are very strained making them quite reactive chemically <strong>and</strong> caryophyllene,<br />
extracted from clove oil as a by-product <strong>of</strong> eugenol production, is used as the starting<br />
material in the synthesis <strong>of</strong> several fragrance ingredients. Longifolene (131) also possesses a strained<br />
ring system. It is a component <strong>of</strong> Indian turpentine <strong>and</strong> is therefore readily available as a feedstock<br />
for fragrance ingredient manufacture.<br />
Guaicwood oil is the richest source <strong>of</strong> guaiol (142) <strong>and</strong> the isomeric bulnesol (147) but both are<br />
found in other oils, particularly guaiol that occurs in a wide variety <strong>of</strong> plants. Dehydration <strong>and</strong><br />
dehydrogenation <strong>of</strong> these give guaiazulene (148), which is used as an anti-inflammatory agent.<br />
Guaiazulene is also accessible from a-gurjunene (149), the major component <strong>of</strong> gurjun balsam.<br />
Guaiazulene is blue in color as is the related olefin chamazulene (150). The latter occurs in a variety<br />
<strong>of</strong> oils but it is particularly important in chamomile to which it imparts the distinctive blue tint<br />
(Figure 5.25).<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
111 113<br />
147<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 5.24 Some sesquiterpenoid alcohols.
Chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 139<br />
146 148<br />
FIGURE 5.25 Some sesquiterpenoid hydrocarbons.<br />
149 150<br />
Vetiver <strong>and</strong> patchouli are two oils <strong>of</strong> great importance in perfumery (Williams, 1996, 2004). Both<br />
contain complex mixtures <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenoids, mostly with complex polycyclic structures (Sell,<br />
2003). The major components <strong>of</strong> vetiver oil are a-vetivone (136), b-vetivone (137), <strong>and</strong> khusimol<br />
(119), but the most important components as far as odor is concerned are minor constituents such as<br />
khusimone (151), zizanal (152), <strong>and</strong> methyl zizanoate (153). Nootkatone (154) is an isomer <strong>of</strong><br />
a-vetivone <strong>and</strong> is an important odor component <strong>of</strong> grapefruit. Patchouli alcohol (145) is the major<br />
constituent <strong>of</strong> patchouli oil but, as is the case also with vetiver, minor components are more important<br />
for the odor pr<strong>of</strong>ile. These include nor-patchoulenol (155) <strong>and</strong> nor-tetrapatchoulol (156) (Figure 5.26).<br />
The molecules <strong>of</strong> chamazulene (150), khusimone (151), nor-patchoulenol (155), <strong>and</strong> nor-tetrapatchoulol<br />
(156) each contain only 14 carbon atoms in place <strong>of</strong> the normal 15 <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenoids.<br />
They are all degradation products <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenoids. Degradation, either by enzymic action or<br />
from environmental chemical processes, can be an important factor in generating essential oil components.<br />
Carotenoids are a family <strong>of</strong> tetraterpenoids characterized by having a tail-to-tail fusion<br />
between two diterpenoid fragments. In the case <strong>of</strong> b-carotene (157), both ends <strong>of</strong> the chain have been<br />
cyclized to form cyclohexane rings. Degradation <strong>of</strong> the central part <strong>of</strong> the chain leads to a number <strong>of</strong><br />
fragments that are found in essential oils <strong>and</strong> the two major families <strong>of</strong> such are the ionones <strong>and</strong><br />
damascones. Both have the same carbon skeleton but in the ionones (Leffingwell & Associates, n.d.;<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
151 152 153<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
154<br />
O<br />
155 156<br />
FIGURE 5.26 Components <strong>of</strong> vetiver, patchouli, <strong>and</strong> grapefruit.
140 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
157<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
158 159<br />
163<br />
164<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
160<br />
161<br />
162<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
165<br />
166 167 168<br />
FIGURE 5.27 Carotenoid degradation products.<br />
Sell, 2003) the site <strong>of</strong> oxygenation is three carbon atoms away from the ring, in damascones oxygenation<br />
is found at the chain carbon next to the ring (Figure 5.27).<br />
The ionones occur naturally in a wide variety <strong>of</strong> flowers, fruits, <strong>and</strong> leaves, <strong>and</strong> are materials <strong>of</strong><br />
major importance in perfumery (Arct<strong>and</strong>er, 1960; <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> Database, n.d.; Gildemeister <strong>and</strong><br />
H<strong>of</strong>fmann, 1956; Günther, 1948; Sell, 2007). About 57% <strong>of</strong> the volatile components <strong>of</strong> violet flowers<br />
are a- (158) <strong>and</strong> b-ionones (159) <strong>and</strong> both isomers occur widely in nature. The damascones are also<br />
found in a wide range <strong>of</strong> plants. They usually occur at a very low level but their very intense odors<br />
mean that they still make a significant contribution to the odors <strong>of</strong> oils containing them. The first to<br />
be isolated <strong>and</strong> characterized was b-damascenone (160), which was found at a level <strong>of</strong> 0.05% in the<br />
oil <strong>of</strong> the Damask rose. Both b-damascenone (160) <strong>and</strong> the a- (161) <strong>and</strong> b-isomers (162) have since<br />
been found in many different essential oils <strong>and</strong> extracts. In the cases <strong>of</strong> safranal (163) <strong>and</strong> cyclocitral<br />
(165), the side chain is degraded even further leaving only one <strong>of</strong> its carbon atoms attached to<br />
the cyclohexane ring. About 70% <strong>of</strong> the volatile component <strong>of</strong> saffron is safranal <strong>and</strong> it makes a<br />
significant contribution to its odor. Other volatile carotenoid degradation products that occur in<br />
essential oils <strong>and</strong> contribute to their odors include the theaspiranes (165), vitispiranes (166), edulans<br />
(167), <strong>and</strong> dihydroactindiolide (168).<br />
The similarity in structure between the ionones <strong>and</strong> the irones might lead to the belief that the<br />
latter are also carotenoid derived. However, this is not the case as the irones are formed by degradation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the triterpenoid iripallidal (169), which occurs in the rhizomes <strong>of</strong> the iris. The three isomers,<br />
a- (170), b- (171), <strong>and</strong> g-irone (172), are all found in iris <strong>and</strong> the first two in a limited number <strong>of</strong><br />
other species (Figure 5.28).<br />
5.6 SYNTHESIS OF ESSENTIAL OIL COMPONENTS<br />
It would be impossible, in a volume <strong>of</strong> this size, to review all <strong>of</strong> the reported syntheses <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oil components <strong>and</strong> so the following discussion will concentrate on some <strong>of</strong> the more commercially<br />
important synthetic routes to selected key substances. In the vast majority <strong>of</strong> cases, there is a balance<br />
between routes using plant extracts as feedstocks <strong>and</strong> those using petrochemicals. For some
Chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 141<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
169<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
170<br />
FIGURE 5.28 Iripallidal <strong>and</strong> the irones.<br />
171<br />
172<br />
materials, plant-derived <strong>and</strong> petrochemical-derived equivalents might exist in economic competition<br />
while for others, one source is more competitive. The balance will vary over time <strong>and</strong> the<br />
market will respond accordingly. Sustainability <strong>of</strong> production routes is a complex issue <strong>and</strong> easy<br />
assumptions might be totally incorrect. Production <strong>and</strong> extraction <strong>of</strong> plant-derived feedstocks <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
requires considerable expenditure <strong>of</strong> energy in fertilizer production, harvesting, <strong>and</strong> processing <strong>and</strong><br />
so it is quite possible that production <strong>of</strong> a material derived from a plant source would use more mineral<br />
oil than the equivalent derived from petrochemical feedstocks.<br />
Figure 5.29 shows some <strong>of</strong> the plant-derived feedstocks used in the synthesis <strong>of</strong> lipids <strong>and</strong><br />
polyketides (Sell, 2006). Rapeseed oil provides erucic acid (173) that can be ozonolyzed to give<br />
brassylic acid (174) <strong>and</strong> heptanal (175), both useful building blocks. The latter can also be obtained,<br />
together with undecylenic acid (176), by pyrolysis <strong>of</strong> ricinoleic acid (177) that is available from<br />
Castor oil. Treatment <strong>of</strong> undecylenic acid (176) with acid leads to movement <strong>of</strong> the double bond<br />
along the chain <strong>and</strong> eventual cyclization to give g-undecalactone (178), which has been found in<br />
narcissus oils. Aldol condensation <strong>of</strong> heptanal (175) with cyclopentanone, followed by Bayer–<br />
Villiger oxidation, gives d-dodecalactone (179), identified in the headspace <strong>of</strong> tuberose. Such aldol<br />
reactions, followed by appropriate further conversions, are important in the commercial production<br />
<strong>of</strong> analogues <strong>of</strong> methyl jasmonate (26) <strong>and</strong> jasmone (27).<br />
Ethylene provides a good example <strong>of</strong> a petrochemical feedstock for the synthesis <strong>of</strong> lipids <strong>and</strong><br />
polyketides. It can be oligomerized to provide a variety <strong>of</strong> alkenes into which functionalization can<br />
be introduced by hydration, oxidation, hydr<strong>of</strong>ormylation, <strong>and</strong> so on. Of course, telomerization can<br />
be used to provide functionalized materials directly.<br />
Eugenol (53) (e.g., clove oil) <strong>and</strong> safrole (59) (e.g., sassafras) are good examples <strong>of</strong> plant-derived<br />
feedstocks that are used in the synthesis <strong>of</strong> other shikimates. Methylation <strong>of</strong> eugenol produces methyleugenol<br />
(56) <strong>and</strong> this can be isomerized using acid or metal catalysts to give methylisoeugenol<br />
(57). Similarly, isomerization <strong>of</strong> eugenol gives isoeugenol (54) <strong>and</strong> oxidative cleavage <strong>of</strong> this, for<br />
example, by ozonolysis gives vanillin (55). This last sequence <strong>of</strong> reactions, when applied to safrole<br />
gives isosafrole (60) <strong>and</strong> heliotropin (61). All <strong>of</strong> these conversions are shown in Figure 5.30.<br />
Production <strong>of</strong> shikimates from petrochemicals for commercial use mostly involves straightforward<br />
chemistry (Arct<strong>and</strong>er, 1969; Bauer <strong>and</strong> Panten, 2006; Däniker, 1987; Sell, 2006). Nowadays<br />
the major starting materials are benzene (180) <strong>and</strong> toluene (181), which are both available in bulk<br />
from petroleum fractions. Alkylation <strong>of</strong> benzene with propylene gives cumene (182), the hydroperoxide<br />
<strong>of</strong> which fragments to give phenol (183) <strong>and</strong> acetone. Phenol itself is an important molecular<br />
building block <strong>and</strong> further oxidation gives catechol (184). Syntheses using these last two materials<br />
will be discussed below. Alkylation <strong>of</strong> benzene with ethylene gives ethylbenzene, which is converted<br />
to styrene (185) via autoxidation, reduction, <strong>and</strong> elimination in a process known as styrene
142 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
Rapeseed oil<br />
173<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O 3<br />
OH<br />
174<br />
O<br />
+<br />
O<br />
O<br />
175<br />
Castor oil<br />
O<br />
H<br />
177<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
175<br />
O<br />
+<br />
176<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
1) cyclopentanone/base<br />
2) H+<br />
3) H2/cat.<br />
4) RCO 3 H<br />
O O<br />
FIGURE 5.29 Some natural feedstocks for synthesis <strong>of</strong> lipids <strong>and</strong> polyketides.<br />
179<br />
178<br />
H+<br />
O<br />
O<br />
monomer/propylene oxide (SMPO) process. The epoxide (186) <strong>of</strong> styrene serves as an intermediate<br />
for 2-phenylethanol (47) <strong>and</strong> phenylacetaldehyde (187), both <strong>of</strong> which occur widely in essential oils.<br />
2-Phenylethanol is also available directly from benzene by Lewis acid catalyzed addition <strong>of</strong> ethylene<br />
oxide <strong>and</strong> as a by-product <strong>of</strong> the SMPO process. Currently, the volume available from the<br />
SMPO process provides most <strong>of</strong> the requirement. All <strong>of</strong> these processes are illustrated in<br />
Figure 5.31.<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
56<br />
O<br />
57<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
53<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
54 55<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
59 60 61<br />
FIGURE 5.30 Shikimates from eugenol <strong>and</strong> safrole.
Chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 143<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O 2<br />
[O]<br />
OH<br />
182<br />
cat.<br />
183 184<br />
O 2<br />
180<br />
cat.<br />
cat.<br />
185<br />
O<br />
By-product<br />
[O]<br />
AlCl 3<br />
H +<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
47 H / cat. 2 186 187<br />
FIGURE 5.31 Benzene as a feedstock for shikimates.<br />
Phenol (183) <strong>and</strong> related materials, such as guaiacol (188), were once isolated from coal tar<br />
but the bulk <strong>of</strong> their supply is currently produced from benzene via cumene as shown in<br />
Figure 5.31. The use <strong>of</strong> these intermediates to produce shikimates is shown in Figure 5.32.<br />
In principle, anethole (53) <strong>and</strong> estragole (methylchavicol) (52) are available from phenol, but in<br />
practice, the dem<strong>and</strong> is met by extraction from turpentine. Carboxylation <strong>of</strong> phenol gives salicylic<br />
acid (38) <strong>and</strong> hence serves as a source for the various salicylate esters. Formylation <strong>of</strong><br />
phenol by formaldehyde, in the presence <strong>of</strong> a suitable catalyst, has now replaced the Reimer–<br />
Tiemann reaction as a route to hydroxybenzaldehydes. The initial products are saligenin (189)<br />
<strong>and</strong> p-hydroxybenzyl alcohol (190), which can be oxidized to salicylaldehyde (191) <strong>and</strong><br />
p-hydroxybenzaldehyde (192), respectively. Condensation <strong>of</strong> salicylaldehyde with acetic acid/<br />
acetic anhydride gives coumarin (50) <strong>and</strong> O-alkylation <strong>of</strong> p-hydroxybenzaldehyde gives anisaldehyde<br />
(44). As mentioned earlier, oxidation <strong>of</strong> phenol provides a route to catechol (184) <strong>and</strong><br />
guaiacol (188). The latter is a precursor for vanillin, <strong>and</strong> catechol also provides a route to<br />
heliotropin (61) via methylenedioxy benzene (193).<br />
Oxidation <strong>of</strong> toluene (181) with air or oxygen in the presence <strong>of</strong> a catalyst gives benzyl alcohol<br />
(194), benzaldehyde (195), or benzoic acid (196) depending on the chemistry employed. The<br />
dem<strong>and</strong> for benzoic acid far exceeds that for the other two oxidation products <strong>and</strong> so such processes<br />
are usually designed to produce mostly benzoic acid with benzaldehyde as a minor product.<br />
For the fragrance industry, benzoic acid is the precursor for the various benzoates <strong>of</strong> interest while<br />
benzaldehyde, through aldol-type chemistry, serves as the key intermediate for cinnamate esters<br />
(such as methyl cinnamate (197)) <strong>and</strong> cinnamaldehyde (48). Reduction <strong>of</strong> the latter gives cinnamyl<br />
alcohol (49) <strong>and</strong> hence, through esterification, provides routes to all <strong>of</strong> the cinnamyl esters.<br />
Chlorination <strong>of</strong> toluene under radical conditions gives benzyl chloride (198). Hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />
chloride gives benzyl alcohol (194), which can, in principle, be esterified to give the various benzyl<br />
esters (199) <strong>of</strong> interest. However, these are more easily accessible directly from the chloride by<br />
reaction with the sodium salt <strong>of</strong> the corresponding carboxylic acid. All <strong>of</strong> these conversions are<br />
shown in Figure 5.33.<br />
Methyl anthranilate (41) is synthesized from either naphthalene (200) or o-xylene (201) as shown<br />
in Figure 5.34. Oxidation <strong>of</strong> either starting material produces phthalic acid (202). Conversion <strong>of</strong> this<br />
diacid to its imide, followed by the H<strong>of</strong>fmann reaction, gives anthranilic acid <strong>and</strong> the methyl ester<br />
can then be obtained by reaction with methanol.
144 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
53<br />
O<br />
52<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
183<br />
38<br />
OH<br />
188<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
184<br />
189<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
+<br />
HO<br />
190<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
193<br />
191<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
192<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
55 61 50 44<br />
FIGURE 5.32 Synthesis <strong>of</strong> shikimates from phenol.<br />
In volume terms, the terpenoids represent the largest group <strong>of</strong> natural <strong>and</strong> nature identical fragrance<br />
ingredients (Däniker, 1987; Sell, 2007). The key materials are the rose alcohols [geraniol<br />
(63)/nerol (90), linalool (23), <strong>and</strong> citronellol (91)], citronellal (103), <strong>and</strong> citral (71). Interconversion<br />
<strong>of</strong> these key intermediates is readily achieved by st<strong>and</strong>ard functional group manipulation. Materials<br />
in this family serve as starting points for the synthesis <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> perfumery materials<br />
including esters <strong>of</strong> the rose alcohols. The ionones are prepared from citral by aldol condensation<br />
followed by cyclization <strong>of</strong> the intermediate y-ionones.<br />
The sources <strong>of</strong> the above key substances fall into three main categories: natural extracts, turpentine,<br />
<strong>and</strong> petrochemicals. The balance depends on economics <strong>and</strong> also on the product in question.<br />
For example, while about 10% <strong>of</strong> geraniol is sourced from natural extracts, it is only about 1% in the<br />
case <strong>of</strong> linalool. Natural grades <strong>of</strong> geraniol are obtained from the oils <strong>of</strong> citronella, geranium, <strong>and</strong><br />
palmarosa (including the variants jamrosa <strong>and</strong> dhanrosa). Citronella is also used as a source <strong>of</strong> citronellal.<br />
Ho, rosewood, <strong>and</strong> linaloe were used as sources <strong>of</strong> linalool but conservation <strong>and</strong> economic<br />
factors have reduced these sources <strong>of</strong> supply very considerably. Similarly, citral was once extracted<br />
from Litsea cubeba but over-harvesting has resulted in loss <strong>of</strong> that source.<br />
Various other natural extracts are used as feedstocks for the production <strong>of</strong> terpenoids as<br />
shown in Figure 5.35. Two <strong>of</strong> the most significant ones are clary sage <strong>and</strong> the citrus oils (obtained<br />
as by-products <strong>of</strong> the fruit juice industry). After distillation <strong>of</strong> the oil from clary sage, sclareol (203)<br />
is extracted from the residue <strong>and</strong> this serves as a starting material for naphth<strong>of</strong>uran (204), known
Chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 145<br />
181<br />
Cl<br />
RCO 2 Na<br />
O<br />
O<br />
R<br />
199<br />
[O]<br />
Cl 2 /R . or hn<br />
198<br />
H 2 O<br />
O OH O<br />
+<br />
195<br />
194<br />
OH<br />
196<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
197<br />
48<br />
49<br />
FIGURE 5.33 Shikimates from toluene.<br />
under trade names such as Ambr<strong>of</strong>ix, Ambrox, <strong>and</strong> Ambroxan. The conversion is shown in Figure<br />
5.35. Initially, sclareol is oxidized to sclareolide (205). This was once effected using oxidants such<br />
as permanganate <strong>and</strong> dichromate but nowadays, the largest commercial process uses a biotechnological<br />
oxidation. Sclareolide is then reduced using lithium aluminum hydride, borane, or similar<br />
reagents <strong>and</strong> the resulting diol is cyclized to the naphth<strong>of</strong>uran. d-Limonene (73) <strong>and</strong> valencene<br />
(206) are both extracted from citrus oils. Reaction <strong>of</strong> d-limonene with nitrosyl choride gives an<br />
adduct that is rearranged to the oxime <strong>of</strong> l-carvone <strong>and</strong> subsequent hydrolysis produces the free<br />
ketone (105). Selective oxidation <strong>of</strong> valencene gives nootkatone (135).<br />
Turpentine is obtained by tapping <strong>of</strong> pine trees <strong>and</strong> this product is known as gum turpentine.<br />
However, a much larger commercial source is the so-called crude sulfate turpentine (CST), which<br />
is obtained as a by-product <strong>of</strong> the Kraft paper process. The major components <strong>of</strong> turpentine are the<br />
two pinenes with a-pinene (65) predominating. Turpentine also serves as a source <strong>of</strong> p-cymene (83)<br />
<strong>and</strong>, as mentioned above, the shikimate anethole (53) (Zinkel <strong>and</strong> Russell, 1989).<br />
Figure 5.36 shows some <strong>of</strong> the major products manufactured from a-pinene (65) (Sell, 2003,<br />
2007). Acid-catalyzed hydration <strong>of</strong> a-pinene gives a-terpineol (74), which is the highest tonnage<br />
200<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
202<br />
41<br />
NH 2<br />
O<br />
201<br />
FIGURE 5.34 Synthesis <strong>of</strong> methyl anthranilate.
146 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
203 205 204<br />
73 105<br />
O<br />
206<br />
FIGURE 5.35 Partial synthesis <strong>of</strong> terpenoids from natural extracts.<br />
135<br />
O<br />
material <strong>of</strong> all those described here. Acid-catalyzed rearrangement <strong>of</strong> a-pinene gives camphene<br />
(89) <strong>and</strong> this, in turn, serves as a starting material for production <strong>of</strong> camphor (80). Hydrogenation<br />
<strong>of</strong> a-pinene gives pinane (207), which is oxidized to pinanol (208) using air as the oxidant. Pyrolysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> pinanol produces linalool (23) <strong>and</strong> this can be rearranged to geraniol (63). Hydrogenation <strong>of</strong><br />
geraniol gives citronellol (91) whereas oxidation leads to citral (71). The major use <strong>of</strong> citral is not as<br />
74 89<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
80<br />
65<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
207 208<br />
23<br />
63<br />
158<br />
O<br />
71<br />
O<br />
91<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 5.36 Products from a-pinene.
Chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 147<br />
OH<br />
76<br />
70<br />
63<br />
O<br />
94<br />
209<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 5.37 Products from b-pinene.<br />
a material in its own right, but as a starting material for production <strong>of</strong> ionones, such as a-ionone<br />
(158) <strong>and</strong> vitamins A, E, <strong>and</strong> K.<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the major products manufactured from b-pinene (76) are shown in Figure 5.37. Pyrolysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> b-pinene gives myrcene (70) <strong>and</strong> this can be “hydrated” (not in one step but in a multistage process)<br />
to give geraniol (63). The downstream products from geraniol are then the same as those<br />
described in the preceding paragraph <strong>and</strong> shown in Figure 5.36. Myrcene is also a starting point for<br />
d-citronellal (209), which is one <strong>of</strong> the major feedstocks for the production <strong>of</strong> l-menthol (94) as will<br />
be described below.<br />
Currently, there are two major routes to terpenoids that use petrochemical starting materials<br />
(Sell, 2003, 2007). The first to be developed is an improved version <strong>of</strong> a synthetic scheme demonstrated<br />
by Arens <strong>and</strong> van Dorp in 1948. The basic concept is to use two molecules <strong>of</strong> acetylene (210)<br />
<strong>and</strong> two <strong>of</strong> acetone (211) to build the structure <strong>of</strong> citral (71). The route, as it is currently practised,<br />
is shown in Figure 5.38. Addition <strong>of</strong> acetylene (210) to acetone (211) in the presence <strong>of</strong> base gives<br />
methylbutynol (212), which is hydrogenated, under Lindlar conditions, to methylbutenol (213). The<br />
second equivalent <strong>of</strong> acetone is introduced as the methyl ether <strong>of</strong> its enol form, that is, methoxypropene<br />
(214). This adds to methylbutenol <strong>and</strong> the resultant adduct undergoes a Claisen rearrangement<br />
210<br />
OH<br />
H 2<br />
/cat.<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
Base<br />
211 212<br />
213<br />
O<br />
214<br />
71<br />
O<br />
H +<br />
OH<br />
216<br />
210<br />
Base<br />
O<br />
215<br />
FIGURE 5.38 Citral from acetylene <strong>and</strong> acetone.
148 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
220<br />
H O<br />
OH<br />
218<br />
Pd<br />
OH<br />
217<br />
219<br />
1) Ag:SiO 2<br />
/O 2<br />
2) Pd<br />
221<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
71<br />
223<br />
222<br />
FIGURE 5.39 Citral from isobutylene <strong>and</strong> acetone.<br />
to give methylheptenone (215). Base catalyzed addition <strong>of</strong> the second acetylene to this gives dehydrolinalool<br />
(216), which can be rearranged under acidic conditions to give citral (71). Hydrogenation<br />
<strong>of</strong> dehydrolinalool under Lindlar conditions gives linalool (23) <strong>and</strong> thus opens up all the routes to<br />
other terpenoids as described above <strong>and</strong> illustrated in Figure 5.36.<br />
The other major route to citral is shown in Figure 5.39. This starts from isobutene (217) <strong>and</strong><br />
formaldehyde (218). The ene reaction between these produces isoprenol (219). Isomerization <strong>of</strong><br />
isoprenol over a palladium catalyst gives prenol (220) <strong>and</strong> aerial oxidation over a silver catalyst<br />
gives prenal (senecioaldehyde) (221). When heated together, these two add together to form the enol<br />
ether (222), which then undergoes a Claisen rearrangement to give the aldehyde (223). This latter<br />
molecule is perfectly set up (after rotation around the central bond) for a Cope rearrangement to give<br />
citral (71). Development chemists have always striven to produce economic processes with the highest<br />
overall yield possible thus minimizing the volume <strong>of</strong> waste <strong>and</strong> hence environmental impact.<br />
This synthesis is a very good example <strong>of</strong> the fruits <strong>of</strong> such work. The reaction scheme uses no<br />
reagents, other than oxygen, employs efficient catalysts, <strong>and</strong> produces only one by-product, water,<br />
which is environmentally benign.<br />
The synthesis <strong>of</strong> l-menthol (94) provides an interesting example <strong>of</strong> different routes operating in<br />
economic balance. The three production routes in current use are shown in Figure 5.40. The oldest<br />
N N O<br />
70 224 225<br />
209<br />
Mentha arvensis<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
226 97<br />
227<br />
FIGURE 5.40 Competing routes to l-menthol.<br />
94<br />
OH
Chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 149<br />
<strong>and</strong> simplest route is extraction from plants <strong>of</strong> the Mentha genus <strong>and</strong> Mentha arvensis (cornmint) in<br />
particular. This is achieved by freezing the oil to force the l-menthol to crystallize out. Diethylamine<br />
can be added to myrcene (70) in the presence <strong>of</strong> base <strong>and</strong> rearrangement <strong>of</strong> the resultant allyl amine<br />
(224) using the optically active catalyst ruthenium (S)-BINAP perchlorate gives the homochiral<br />
enamine (225). This can then be hydrolyzed to d-citronellol (209). The chiral center in this molecule<br />
ensures that, on acid catalyzed cyclization, the two new stereocentres formed possess the correct<br />
stereochemistry for conversion, by hydrogenation, to give l-menthol as the final product. Starting<br />
from the petrochemically sourced m-cresol (226), propenylation gives thymol (97), which can be<br />
hydrogenated to give a mixture <strong>of</strong> all eight stereoisomers <strong>of</strong> menthol (227). Fractional distillation <strong>of</strong><br />
this mixture gives racemic menthol. Resolution was originally carried out by fractional crystallization,<br />
but recent advances include methods for the enzymic resolution <strong>of</strong> the racemate to give<br />
l-menthol.<br />
Estimation <strong>of</strong> the long-term sustainability <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> these routes is complex <strong>and</strong> the final outcome<br />
is far from certain. In terms <strong>of</strong> renewability <strong>of</strong> feedstocks, m-cresol might appear to be at a<br />
disadvantage against mint or turpentine. However, as the world’s population increases, use <strong>of</strong> agricultural<br />
l<strong>and</strong> will come under pressure for food production, hence increasing pressure on mint<br />
cultivation <strong>and</strong> turpentine, hence, myrcene is a by-product <strong>of</strong> paper manufacture <strong>and</strong> is therefore<br />
vulnerable to trends in paper recycling <strong>and</strong> “the paperless <strong>of</strong>fice.” In terms <strong>of</strong> energy consumption,<br />
<strong>and</strong> hence current dependence on petrochemicals, the picture is also not as clear as might be imagined.<br />
Harvesting <strong>and</strong> processing <strong>of</strong> mint requires energy <strong>and</strong>, if the crop is grown in the same field<br />
over time, fertilizer is required <strong>and</strong> this is produced by the very energy-intensive Haber process.<br />
The energy required to turn trees in a forest into pulp at a sawmill is also significant <strong>and</strong> so turpentine<br />
supply will also be affected by energy prices. No doubt, the skills <strong>of</strong> process chemists will be<br />
<strong>of</strong> increasing importance as we strive to make the best use <strong>of</strong> natural resources <strong>and</strong> minimize<br />
energy consumption (Baser <strong>and</strong> Demirci, 2007).<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Arct<strong>and</strong>er, S., 1960. Perfume <strong>and</strong> Flavour Materials <strong>of</strong> Natural Origin. Elizabeth, NJ: Steffen Arct<strong>and</strong>er.<br />
(Currently available from Allured Publishing Corp.)<br />
Arct<strong>and</strong>er, S., 1969. Perfume <strong>and</strong> Flavor Chemicals (Aroma Chemicals). Montclair, NJ: Steffen Arct<strong>and</strong>er.<br />
(Currently available from Allured Publishing Corp.)<br />
Baser, K.H.C. <strong>and</strong> F. Demirci, 2007. Chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, In Flavours <strong>and</strong> Fragrances: Chemistry,<br />
Bioprocessing <strong>and</strong> Sustainability, R.G. Berger (ed.), pp. 43–86, Berlin: Springer.<br />
Bauer, K. <strong>and</strong> J. Panten, 2006. Common Fragrance <strong>and</strong> Flavor Materials: Preparation, Properties <strong>and</strong> Uses.<br />
New York: Wiley-VCH.<br />
Bu’Lock, J.D., 1965. The Biosynthesis <strong>of</strong> Natural Products. New York: McGraw-Hill.<br />
Croteau, R., 1987. Biosynthesis <strong>and</strong> catabolism <strong>of</strong> monoterpenoids. Chem. Rev., 87: 929.<br />
Däniker, H.U., 1987. Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances (Worldwide). Stamford: SRI International.<br />
Devon, T.K. <strong>and</strong> A.I. Scott, 1972. <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> Naturally Occurring Compounds, Vol. 2, The Terpenes.<br />
New York: Academic Press.<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> Database, Boelens Aromachemical Information Systems, Huizen, The Netherl<strong>and</strong>s.<br />
Gildemeister, E. <strong>and</strong> Fr. H<strong>of</strong>fmann, 1956. Die Ätherischen ÖIe. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.<br />
Günther, E., 1948. The <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>. New York: D van Nostr<strong>and</strong>.<br />
Hay, R.K.M. <strong>and</strong> P.G. Waterman (eds), 1993. Volatile Oil Crops: Their Biology, Biochemistry <strong>and</strong> Production.<br />
London: Longman.<br />
Lawrence, B.M., 1985. A review <strong>of</strong> the world production <strong>of</strong> essential oils. Perfumer Flavorist, 10(5): 1.<br />
Leffingwell & Associates, http://www.leffingwell.com/<br />
Lehninger, A.L., 1993. Principles <strong>of</strong> Biochemistry. New York: Worth.<br />
Mann, J., R.S. Davidson, J.B. Hobbs, D.V. Banthorpe, <strong>and</strong> J.B. Harbourne, 1994. Natural Products: Their<br />
Chemistry <strong>and</strong> Biological Signifi cance. London: Longman.<br />
Matthews C.K. <strong>and</strong> K.E. van Holde. 1990. Biochemistry. Redwood City: Benjamin/Cummings.<br />
Sell, C.S., 2003. A Fragrant Introduction to Terpenoid Chemistry. Cambridge: Royal Society <strong>of</strong> Chemistry.
150 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Sell, C.S. (ed.), 2006. The Chemistry <strong>of</strong> Fragrances from Perfumer to Consumer, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Royal<br />
Society <strong>of</strong> Chemistry.<br />
Sell, C.S., 2007. Terpenoids. In the Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia <strong>of</strong> Chemical <strong>Technology</strong>, 5th ed. New York:<br />
Wiley.<br />
Williams, D.G., 1996. The Chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>. Weymouth: Micelle Press.<br />
Williams, D.G., 2004. Perfumes <strong>of</strong> Yesterday. Weymouth: Micelle Press.<br />
Zinkel, D.F. <strong>and</strong> J. Russell (eds), 1989. Naval Stores. New York: Pulp Chemicals Association, Inc.
6<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Barbara d’Acampora Zellner, Paola Dugo, Giovanni Dugo,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Luigi Mondello<br />
CONTENTS<br />
6.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 151<br />
6.2 Classical Analytical Techniques ........................................................................................ 152<br />
6.3 Modern Analytical Techniques ......................................................................................... 156<br />
6.3.1 Use <strong>of</strong> GC <strong>and</strong> Linear Retention Indices in <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> Analysis .................... 157<br />
6.3.2 Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry ............................................................. 158<br />
6.3.3 Fast GC for <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Analysis ........................................................................ 159<br />
6.3.4 Gas Chromatography-Olfactometry for the Assessment <strong>of</strong> Odor-Active<br />
Components <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> ................................................................................ 162<br />
6.3.5 Gas Chromatographic Enantiomer Characterization <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> ................. 164<br />
6.3.6 LC <strong>and</strong> Liquid Chromatography Hyphenated to MS in the Analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> ................................................................................................ 165<br />
6.3.7 Multidimensional Gas Chromatographic Techniques ........................................... 167<br />
6.3.8 Multidimensional Liquid Chromatographic Techniques ....................................... 174<br />
6.3.9 On-Line Coupled Liquid Chromatography-Gas Chromatography (LC-GC) ........ 176<br />
6.4 General Considerations on <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Analysis ............................................................ 177<br />
References .................................................................................................................................. 177<br />
6.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
The production <strong>of</strong> essential oils was industrialized in the first half <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century, due to<br />
an increased dem<strong>and</strong> for these matrices as perfume <strong>and</strong> flavor ingredients [1]. As a consequence the<br />
need to perform their systematic investigation also became unprecedented. It is interesting to point<br />
out that in the second edition <strong>of</strong> Parry’s monograph, published in 1908, about 90 essential oils were<br />
listed, <strong>and</strong> very little was known about their composition [2]. Further important contributions to the<br />
essential oil research field were made by Semmler [3], Gildemeister <strong>and</strong> H<strong>of</strong>fmann [4], Finnemore [5],<br />
<strong>and</strong> Guenther [6]. Obviously, it is unfeasible to cite all the researchers involved in the progress <strong>of</strong><br />
essential oil analysis.<br />
As widely acknowledged, the composition <strong>of</strong> essential oils is mainly represented by mono- <strong>and</strong><br />
sesquiterpene hydrocarbons <strong>and</strong> their oxygenated (hydroxyl <strong>and</strong> carbonyl) derivatives, along with<br />
aliphatic aldehydes, alcohols, <strong>and</strong> esters. Terpenes can be considered as the most structurally varied<br />
class <strong>of</strong> plant natural products, derived from the repetitive fusion <strong>of</strong> branched five-carbon units<br />
(isoprene units) [7]. In this respect, analytical methods applied in the characterization <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oils have to account for a great number <strong>of</strong> molecular species. Moreover, it is also <strong>of</strong> great importance<br />
to highlight that an essential oil chemical pr<strong>of</strong>ile is closely related to the extraction procedure<br />
employed <strong>and</strong>, hence, the choice <strong>of</strong> an appropriate extraction method becomes crucial. On the basis<br />
151
152 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> the properties <strong>of</strong> the plant material, the following extraction techniques can be applied: steam<br />
distillation (SD), possibly followed by rectification <strong>and</strong> fractionation, solvent extraction (SE), fractionation<br />
<strong>of</strong> solvent extracts, maceration, expression (cold pressing <strong>of</strong> citrus peels), enfl eurage,<br />
supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), pressurized-fluid extraction, simultaneous distillation– extraction<br />
(SDE), Soxhlet extraction, microwave-assisted hydrodistillation (MAHD), dynamic (DHS) <strong>and</strong><br />
static (SHS) headspace (HS) techniques, solvent-assisted flavor evaporation (SAFE), solid-phase<br />
microextraction (SPME), <strong>and</strong> direct thermal desorption (DTD), among others.<br />
Apart from the great interest in performing systematic studies on essential oils, there is also the<br />
necessity to trace adulterations, mainly in economically important essential oils. As can be observed<br />
with almost all commercially available products, market changes occur rapidly, affecting individual<br />
plants, or industrial processes. In general, market competition, along with the limited interest <strong>of</strong><br />
consumers with regard to essential oil quality, may induce producers to adulterate their commodities<br />
by the addition <strong>of</strong> products <strong>of</strong> lower value. Different types <strong>of</strong> adulterations can be encountered:<br />
(a) the simple addition <strong>of</strong> natural <strong>and</strong>/or synthetic compounds, with the aim <strong>of</strong> generating an oil<br />
characterized by specific quality values, such as density, optical rotation, residue percentage, ester<br />
value, <strong>and</strong> so on or (b) refined sophistications in the reconstitution <strong>and</strong> counterfeiting <strong>of</strong> commercially<br />
valuable oils. In the latter case, natural <strong>and</strong>/or synthetic compounds are added to enhance the<br />
market value <strong>of</strong> an oil, attempting to maintain the qualitative, or even quantitative, composition <strong>of</strong><br />
natural essential oils, <strong>and</strong> making adulteration detection a troublesome task. Consequently, the<br />
exploitation <strong>of</strong> modern analytical methodologies, such as gas chromatography (GC) <strong>and</strong> related<br />
hyphenated techniques, is practically unavoidable.<br />
As a consequence <strong>of</strong> diffused illegal practice in the production <strong>of</strong> essential oils, there has been<br />
an enhanced request for legal st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>of</strong> commercial purity, while essential oils were included as<br />
herbal drugs in pharmacopoeias [8–12], <strong>and</strong> also in a compendium denominated as Martindale: the<br />
complete drug reference (formerly named as Martindale’s: The Extra Pharmacopoeia) [13]. In view<br />
<strong>of</strong> the need for st<strong>and</strong>ardized methodologies, these pharmacopoeias commonly include the descriptions<br />
<strong>of</strong> several tests, processes, <strong>and</strong> apparatus. In addition, various international st<strong>and</strong>ard regulations<br />
have been introduced in which the characteristics <strong>of</strong> specific essential oils are described, <strong>and</strong><br />
the botanical source <strong>and</strong> physicochemical requirements are reported. Such st<strong>and</strong>ardized information<br />
was created to facilitate the assessment <strong>of</strong> quality; for example, ISO 3761 (1997) specifies that<br />
for Brazilian rosewood essential oil (Aniba rosaeodora Ducke) an alcohol content in the 84–93%<br />
range, determined as linalool, is required [14]. Moreover, guidelines for the analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils<br />
are also available; for example, for the measurement <strong>of</strong> the refractive index (ISO 280, 1198) <strong>and</strong><br />
optical rotation (ISO 592, 1998), as also for GC analysis using capillary columns [ISO chromatography<br />
(ISO 8432, 1987)] [15]. The French St<strong>and</strong>ards Association (Association Française de<br />
Normalisation—AFNOR) also develops norms <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard methods dedicated to the essential oil<br />
research field, with the aim <strong>of</strong> assessing quality in relation to specific physical, organoleptic, chemical,<br />
<strong>and</strong> chromatographic characteristics [16].<br />
The present contribution provides an overview on the classical <strong>and</strong> modern analytical techniques<br />
commonly applied to characterize essential oils. Modern techniques will be focused on chromatographic<br />
analyses, including theoretical aspects <strong>and</strong> applications.<br />
6.2 CLASSICAL ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES<br />
The thorough study <strong>of</strong> essential oils is based on the relationship between their physical <strong>and</strong> chemical<br />
properties, <strong>and</strong> is completed by the assessment <strong>of</strong> organoleptic qualities. The earliest analytical<br />
methods applied in the investigation <strong>of</strong> an essential oil were commonly focused on quality aspects,<br />
concerning mainly two properties, namely identity <strong>and</strong> purity [17].<br />
The following techniques are commonly applied to assess an essential oil physical properties<br />
[6,17]: specific gravity (SG), which is the most frequently reported physicochemical property, <strong>and</strong> is<br />
a special case <strong>of</strong> relative density, [r] T(°C) , defined as the ratio <strong>of</strong> the densities <strong>of</strong> a given oil <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>
Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 153<br />
water when both are at identical temperatures. The attained value is characteristic for each essential<br />
oil <strong>and</strong> commonly ranges between 0.696 <strong>and</strong> 1.118 at 15°C [4]. In cases in which the determinations<br />
were made at different temperatures, conversion factors can be used to normalize data.<br />
The measurement <strong>of</strong> optical rotation, [a] D<br />
20<br />
, either dextrorotatory or laevorotatory, is also widely<br />
recognized. Optical activity is determined by using a polarimeter, with the angle <strong>of</strong> rotation depending<br />
on a series <strong>of</strong> parameters, such as oil nature, the length <strong>of</strong> the column through which the light<br />
passes, the applied wavelength, <strong>and</strong> the temperature. The degree <strong>and</strong> direction <strong>of</strong> rotation are <strong>of</strong><br />
great importance for purity assessments, since they are related to the structures <strong>and</strong> the concentration<br />
<strong>of</strong> chiral molecules in the sample. Each optically active substance has its own specific rotation,<br />
as defined in Biot’s law:<br />
T<br />
a<br />
a =<br />
cl ◊<br />
T l<br />
[] l<br />
,<br />
where a is the optical rotation at a temperature T expressed in °C, l is the optical path length in dm,<br />
l is the wavelength, <strong>and</strong> c is the concentration in g/100 mL. It is worthy <strong>of</strong> note that a st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
100 mm tube is commonly used; in cases in which darker or lighter colored oils are analyzed, longer<br />
or shorter tubes are used, respectively, <strong>and</strong> the rotation should be extrapolated for a 100-mm-long<br />
tube. Moreover, prior to the measurement, the essential oil should be dried out with anhydrous<br />
sodium sulfate <strong>and</strong> filtered.<br />
The determination <strong>of</strong> the refractive index, [h] D<br />
20<br />
, also represents a characteristic physical constant<br />
<strong>of</strong> an oil, usually ranging from 1.450 to 1.590. This index is represented by the ratio <strong>of</strong> the sine <strong>of</strong><br />
the angle <strong>of</strong> incidence (i) to the sine <strong>of</strong> the angle <strong>of</strong> refraction (e) <strong>of</strong> a beam <strong>of</strong> light passing from a<br />
less dense to a denser medium, such as from air to the essential oil:<br />
sini<br />
sine<br />
=<br />
N<br />
,<br />
n<br />
where N <strong>and</strong> n are, respectively, the indices <strong>of</strong> the more <strong>and</strong> the less dense medium. The Abbé-type<br />
refractometer, equipped with a monochromatic sodium light source, is recommended for routine<br />
essential oil analysis; the instrument is calibrated through the analysis <strong>of</strong> distilled water at 20°C,<br />
producing a refractive index <strong>of</strong> 1.3330. In cases in which the measurement is performed at a<br />
temperature above or below 20°C, a correction factor per degree must be added or subtracted,<br />
respectively [18].<br />
A further procedure that can be applied for the purity assessment <strong>of</strong> essential oils is based on<br />
water solubility; the test, which reveals the presence <strong>of</strong> polar substances, such as alcohols, glycols<br />
<strong>and</strong> their esters, <strong>and</strong> glycerin acetates, is carried out as follows: the oil is added to a saturated solution<br />
<strong>of</strong> sodium chloride, which after homogenization is divided into two phases; the volume <strong>of</strong> the<br />
oil, which is the organic phase, should remain unaltered; volume reduction indicates the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
water-soluble substances. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the solubility, or immiscibility, <strong>of</strong> an essential oil in<br />
ethanol reveals much on its quality. Considering that essential oils are slightly soluble in water <strong>and</strong><br />
are miscible with ethanol, it is simple to determine the number <strong>of</strong> volumes <strong>of</strong> water-diluted ethanol<br />
required for the complete solubility <strong>of</strong> one volume <strong>of</strong> oil; the analysis is carried out at 20°C, if the<br />
oil is liquid at this temperature. It must be emphasized that oils rich in oxygenated compounds<br />
are more readily soluble in dilute ethanol than those richer in hydrocarbons. Moreover, aged or<br />
improperly stored oils frequently present decreased solubility [6].<br />
The investigation on the solubility <strong>of</strong> essential oils in other media is also widely accepted, such<br />
as the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> water by means <strong>of</strong> a simple procedure: the addition <strong>of</strong> a volume<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oil to an equal volume <strong>of</strong> carbon disulfide or chlor<strong>of</strong>orm; in case the oil is rich in oxygenated<br />
constituents it may contain dissolved water, generating turbidity. A further solubility test,
154 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
in which the oil is dissolved in an aqueous solution <strong>of</strong> potassium hydroxide, is applied to oils containing<br />
molecules with phenolic groups; finally, the incomplete dissolution <strong>of</strong> oils rich in aldehydes<br />
in a dilute bisulfite solution may denote the presence <strong>of</strong> impurities.<br />
The estimation <strong>of</strong> melting <strong>and</strong> congealing points, as well as the boiling range <strong>of</strong> essential oils, is<br />
also <strong>of</strong> great importance for identity <strong>and</strong> purity assessments. Melting point evaluations are a valuable<br />
modality to control essential oil purity, since a large number <strong>of</strong> molecules generally comprised<br />
in essential oils melt within a range <strong>of</strong> 0.5°C or, in the case <strong>of</strong> decomposition, over a narrow temperature<br />
range. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the determination <strong>of</strong> the congealing point is usually applied in<br />
cases where the essential oil consists mainly <strong>of</strong> one molecule, such as the oil <strong>of</strong> cloves that contains<br />
about 90% <strong>of</strong> eugenol. In the latter case, such a test enables the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the percentage amount<br />
<strong>of</strong> the abundant compound. At congealing point, crystallization occurs accompanied by heat liberation,<br />
leading to a rapid increase in temperature which is then stabilized at the so-called congealing<br />
point. A further purity evaluation method is represented by the boiling range determination, through<br />
which the percentage <strong>of</strong> oil that distils below a certain temperature or within a temperature range is<br />
investigated.<br />
An additional test usually performed in essential oil analysis is the evaporation residue, in which<br />
the percentage <strong>of</strong> the oil that is not released at 100°C is determined. In the specific case <strong>of</strong> citrus<br />
oils, this test enables purity assessment, since a lower amount <strong>of</strong> residue in an expressed oil may<br />
indicate an addition <strong>of</strong> distilled volatile components to the oil; an increased residue amount reveals<br />
the possible presence <strong>of</strong> terpenes with higher molecular weights, through the addition <strong>of</strong> single<br />
compounds (or other essential oils), or <strong>of</strong> heavier oils, such as rosin oil, cheaper citrus oils, or by<br />
directly using the citrus oil residue. An example consists <strong>of</strong> the addition <strong>of</strong> lime oil to sophisticate<br />
lemon oils. In oxidized or polymerized oils the presence <strong>of</strong> less volatile compounds is common; in<br />
this case, a simple test may be carried out by applying a drop <strong>of</strong> oil on a piece <strong>of</strong> filter paper; if a<br />
transparent spot persists for a period <strong>of</strong> over 24 h, the oil is most probably degradated. Furthermore,<br />
the residue can be subjected to acid <strong>and</strong> saponification number analyses; for instance, the addition<br />
<strong>of</strong> rosin oil would increase the acid number since this oil, differently from other volatile oils, is<br />
characterized by the presence <strong>of</strong> complex acids. By definition, the acid number is the number <strong>of</strong><br />
milligrams <strong>of</strong> potassium hydroxide required to neutralize the free acids contained in 1 g <strong>of</strong> an oil.<br />
This number is preserved in cases in which the essential oil has been carefully dried <strong>and</strong> stored in<br />
dark <strong>and</strong> airtight recipients. As commonly observed, the acid number increases along the aging<br />
process <strong>of</strong> an oil; oxidation <strong>of</strong> aldehydes <strong>and</strong> hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> esters trigger the increase <strong>of</strong> the acid<br />
number.<br />
Classical methodologies have been also widely applied to assess essential oil chemical properties<br />
[6,17], such as the determination <strong>of</strong> the presences <strong>of</strong> halogenated hydrocarbons <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> heavy<br />
metals. The former investigation is exploited to reveal the presence <strong>of</strong> halogenated compounds,<br />
commonly added to the oils for adulteration purposes. Several tests have been developed for halogen<br />
detection, with the Beilstein method [19] the one most reported. In practice, a copper wire is<br />
cleaned <strong>and</strong> heated in a Bunsen burner flame to form a coating <strong>of</strong> copper (II) oxide. It is then<br />
dipped in the sample to be tested <strong>and</strong> once again heated in the flame. A positive test is indicated by<br />
a green flame caused by the formation <strong>of</strong> a copper halide. Attention is to be paid to positive<br />
or inconclusive results, since they may be induced by trace amounts <strong>of</strong> organic acids, nitrogencontaining<br />
compounds [6], or salts [20]. An alternative to the Beilstein method is the sodium<br />
fusion test, in which the oil is first mineralized, <strong>and</strong> in the case halogenated hydrocarbons are present,<br />
a residue <strong>of</strong> sodium halide is formed, which is soluble in nitric acid, <strong>and</strong> precipitates as the<br />
respective silver halide by the addition <strong>of</strong> a small amount <strong>of</strong> silver nitrate solution [17]. With regard<br />
to the detection <strong>of</strong> heavy metals, several tests are described to investigate <strong>and</strong> ensure the absence<br />
especially <strong>of</strong> copper <strong>and</strong> lead. One method is based on the extraction <strong>of</strong> the essential oil with a<br />
diluted hydrochloric acid solution, followed by the formation <strong>of</strong> an aqueous phase to which a<br />
buffered thioacetamide solution is added. The latter reagent leads to the formation <strong>of</strong> sulfite ions<br />
that are used in the detection <strong>of</strong> heavy metals.
Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 155<br />
The determination <strong>of</strong> esters derived from phthalic acid is also <strong>of</strong> great interest for the toxicity<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> an essential oil. Considering that esters commonly contained in essential oils are<br />
derived from monobasic acids, at first, saponification is carried out through the addition <strong>of</strong> an ethanolic<br />
potassium hydroxide solution. The formed potassium phthalate, which is not soluble in ethanol,<br />
generates a crystalline precipitate [17].<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> qualitative information alone is not sufficient to correctly characterize an essential oil,<br />
<strong>and</strong> quantitative data are <strong>of</strong> extreme importance. Classical methods are generally focused on chemical<br />
groups <strong>and</strong> the assessment <strong>of</strong> quantitative information through titration is widely applied, for<br />
example, for the acidimetric determination <strong>of</strong> saponified terpene esters. Saponification can be performed<br />
with heat, <strong>and</strong> in the case readily saponified esters are to be investigated, in the cold, <strong>and</strong><br />
afterward the alkali excess is titrated with aqueous hydrochloric acid; thereafter the ester number<br />
can be calculated. A further test is the determination <strong>of</strong> terpene alcohols by acetylating with acetic<br />
anhydride; part <strong>of</strong> the acetic anhydride is consumed in the reaction <strong>and</strong> can be quantified through<br />
titration <strong>of</strong> acetic acid with sodium hydroxide. The percentage <strong>of</strong> alcohol can then be calculated.<br />
The latter method is applied when the alcoholic constituents <strong>of</strong> an essential oil are not well known;<br />
in case these are established, the oil is saponified <strong>and</strong> the ester number <strong>of</strong> the acetylated oil is calculated<br />
<strong>and</strong> used to estimate the free alcohol content.<br />
Other chemical classes worthy <strong>of</strong> mention are aldehydes <strong>and</strong> ketones that may be investigated<br />
through different tests. The bisulfite method is recommended for essential oils rich in aldehydic<br />
compounds, as lemongrass, bitter almond, <strong>and</strong> cassia, while the neutral sulfite test is more suitable<br />
for ketone-rich oils, as spearmint, caraway, <strong>and</strong> dill oils. For essential oils presenting small amounts<br />
<strong>of</strong> aldehydes <strong>and</strong> ketones, the hydroxylamine method, or its modification, the Stillman–Reed method<br />
are the most indicated ones [20]. In the latter case, the aldehyde <strong>and</strong> ketone contents are determined<br />
through the addition <strong>of</strong> a neutralized hydroxylamine hydrochloride solution, <strong>and</strong> subsequent titration<br />
with st<strong>and</strong>ardized acid (the Stillman–Reed method) [21]; in the former analytical procedure,<br />
the aldehyde <strong>and</strong> ketone content is established through the addition <strong>of</strong> a hydroxylamine hydrochloride<br />
solution, followed by neutralization with the reaction products, that is, alkali <strong>of</strong> the hydrochloric<br />
acid. These methods may be applied in the determination <strong>of</strong> citral in citrus oils <strong>and</strong> carvone<br />
in caraway oil. With regard to the determination <strong>of</strong> phenols, such as eugenol in clove oil or thymol<br />
<strong>and</strong> carvacrol in thyme oil, the test is commonly made through the addition <strong>of</strong> potassium hydroxide<br />
solutions, forming water-soluble salts. It has to be pointed out that besides phenols, other constituents<br />
are soluble in alkali solutions <strong>and</strong> in water [6,20].<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils are also <strong>of</strong>ten analyzed by means <strong>of</strong> chromatographic methods. In general, the<br />
principle <strong>of</strong> chromatography is based on the distribution <strong>of</strong> the constituents to be separated between<br />
two immiscible phases; one <strong>of</strong> these is a stationary bed (a stationary phase) with a large surface<br />
area, while the other is a mobile phase that percolates through the stationary bed in a definite direction<br />
[22]. Planar chromatography may be referred to as a classical method for essential oil analysis,<br />
being well represented by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) <strong>and</strong> paper chromatography (PC). In<br />
both techniques, the stationary phase is distributed as a thin layer on a flat support, in PC being selfsupporting,<br />
while in TLC coated on a glass, plastic, or metal surface; the mobile phase is allowed to<br />
ascend through the layer by capillary forces. TLC is a fast <strong>and</strong> inexpensive method for identifying<br />
substances <strong>and</strong> testing the purity <strong>of</strong> compounds, being widely used as a preliminary technique providing<br />
valuable information for subsequent analyses [23]. Separations in TLC involve the distribution<br />
<strong>of</strong> one or a mixture <strong>of</strong> substances between a stationary phase <strong>and</strong> a mobile phase. The stationary<br />
phase is a thin layer <strong>of</strong> adsorbent (usually silica gel or alumina) coated on a plate. The mobile phase<br />
is a developing solvent that travels up the stationary phase, carrying the samples with it. Components<br />
<strong>of</strong> the samples will separate on the stationary phase according to their stationary phase–mobile<br />
phase affinities [24]. In practice, a small quantity <strong>of</strong> the sample is applied near one edge <strong>of</strong> the plate<br />
<strong>and</strong> its position is marked with a pencil. The plate is then positioned in a developing chamber with<br />
one end immersed in the developing solvent, the mobile phase, avoiding the direct contact <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sample with the solvent. When the mobile phase reaches about two-third <strong>of</strong> the plate length, the
156 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
plate is removed, dried, the solvent front is traced, <strong>and</strong> the separated components are located. In<br />
some cases the spots are directly visible, but in others they must be visualized by using methods<br />
applicable to almost all organic samples, such as the use <strong>of</strong> a solution <strong>of</strong> iodine or sulfuric acid, both<br />
<strong>of</strong> which react with organic compounds yielding dark products. The use <strong>of</strong> an ultraviolet (UV) lamp<br />
is also advisable, especially if a substance that aids in the visualization <strong>of</strong> compounds is incorporated<br />
into the plate, as is the case <strong>of</strong> many commercially available TLC plates. Data interpretation<br />
is made through the calculation <strong>of</strong> the ratio <strong>of</strong> fronts (R f ) value for each spot, which is defined as<br />
R<br />
f<br />
=<br />
Z<br />
Z<br />
S<br />
St<br />
,<br />
where Z S is the distance from the starting point to the center <strong>of</strong> a specific spot, <strong>and</strong> Z St is the distance<br />
from the starting point to the solvent front [24,25]. A concise review on TLC has been made by<br />
Sherma [26].<br />
The R f value is characteristic for any given compound on the same stationary phase using the<br />
identical mobile phase. Hence, known R f values can be compared to those <strong>of</strong> unknown substances<br />
to aid in their identification [24]. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, separations in PC involve the same principles<br />
as those in TLC, differing in the use <strong>of</strong> a high-quality filter paper as the stationary phase instead <strong>of</strong><br />
a thin adsorbent layer, by the increased time requirements <strong>and</strong> poorer resolution. It is worthy to<br />
highlight that TLC has largely replaced PC in contemporary laboratory practice [22].<br />
As is well known, essential oils can be characterized by their organoleptic properties, an assessment<br />
that involves human subjects as measuring tools. These procedures present an immediate<br />
problem, linked to the innate variability between individuals, not only as a result <strong>of</strong> their previous<br />
experiences <strong>and</strong> expectations, but also to their sensitivity [27]. In this respect, individuals are<br />
selected <strong>and</strong> screened for specific anosmia, as proposed by Friedrich et al. [28]. In the case no insensitivities<br />
are found, the panelists are introduced to two sensorial properties, quality, <strong>and</strong> intensity.<br />
Odor quality is described according to the odor families, while intensity is measured through the<br />
rating <strong>of</strong> a sensation based on an intensity interval scale. The assessment <strong>of</strong> an essential oil odor can<br />
be performed through its addition to filter paper strips <strong>and</strong> subsequent evaluation by the panelists.<br />
Considering that each volatile compound is characterized by a different volatility, the evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />
the paper strip in different periods <strong>of</strong> time enables the classification <strong>of</strong> the odors in top, middle, <strong>and</strong><br />
bottom notes [29]. In addition, the olfactive assessment during the determination <strong>of</strong> the evaporation<br />
residue is also <strong>of</strong> significance, since by-notes <strong>of</strong> low-boiling adulterants or contaminants may be<br />
detected as the oil vaporizes, <strong>and</strong> the odor <strong>of</strong> the final hot residue can reveal the addition <strong>of</strong> highboiling<br />
compounds. Olfactive analyses are also valuable after the determination <strong>of</strong> phenols in essential<br />
oils, by studying the nonphenolic portion [6].<br />
It is noteworthy that the use <strong>of</strong> the earliest analytical techniques for the systematic study <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oils, such as SG, relative density, optical activity, <strong>and</strong> refractive index, or melting, congealing,<br />
<strong>and</strong> boiling points determinations, are generally applied for the assessment <strong>of</strong> pure compounds, <strong>and</strong><br />
may be extended to evaluate essential oils composed <strong>of</strong> a major compound. Classical methods cannot<br />
be used as st<strong>and</strong>-alone methods <strong>and</strong> need to be combined with modern analytical techniques,<br />
especially GC, for the assessment <strong>of</strong> essential oil genuineness.<br />
6.3 MODERN ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the methods applied in the analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils rely on chromatographic procedures,<br />
which enable component separation <strong>and</strong> identification. However, additional confirmatory evidence<br />
is required for reliable identification, avoiding equivocated characterizations.<br />
In the early stages <strong>of</strong> research in the essential oil field, attention was devoted to the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> methods in order to acquire deeper knowledge on the pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> volatiles; however, this analytical
Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 157<br />
task was made troublesome due to the complexity <strong>of</strong> these real-world samples. Over the last decades,<br />
the aforementioned research area has benefited from the improvements in instrumental analytical<br />
chemistry, especially in the chromatographic area, <strong>and</strong>, nowadays, the number <strong>of</strong> known constituents<br />
has drastically increased.<br />
The primary objective in any chromatographic separation is always the complete resolution <strong>of</strong><br />
the compounds <strong>of</strong> interest, in the minimum time. To achieve this task the most suitable analytical<br />
column (dimension <strong>and</strong> stationary phase type) has to be used, <strong>and</strong> adequate chromatographic parameters<br />
must be applied to limit peak enlargement phenomena. A good knowledge <strong>of</strong> chromatographic<br />
theory is, indeed, <strong>of</strong> great support for the method optimization process, as well as for the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> innovative techniques.<br />
In gas chromatographic analysis, the compounds to be analyzed are vaporized <strong>and</strong> eluted by the<br />
mobile gas phase, the carrier gas, through the column. The analytes are separated on the basis <strong>of</strong><br />
their relative vapor pressures <strong>and</strong> affinities for the stationary bed. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, in liquid chromatographic<br />
analysis, the compounds are eluted by a liquid mobile phase consisting <strong>of</strong> a solvent or<br />
a mixture <strong>of</strong> solvents, the composition <strong>of</strong> which may vary during the analysis (gradient elution), <strong>and</strong><br />
are separated according to their affinities for the stationary bed. In general, the volatile fraction <strong>of</strong><br />
an essential oil is analyzed by GC, while the nonvolatile by liquid chromatography (LC).<br />
At the outlet <strong>of</strong> the chromatography column, the analytes emerge separated in time. The analytes<br />
are then detected <strong>and</strong> a signal is recorded generating a chromatogram, which is a signal versus time<br />
graphic, <strong>and</strong> ideally with peaks presenting a Gaussian distribution-curve shape. The peak area <strong>and</strong><br />
height are a function <strong>of</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> solute present <strong>and</strong> its width is a function <strong>of</strong> b<strong>and</strong> spreading in<br />
the column [30], while retention time can be related to the solute’s identity. Hence, the information<br />
contained in the chromatogram can be used for qualitative <strong>and</strong> quantitative analysis.<br />
6.3.1 USE OF GC AND LINEAR RETENTION INDICES IN ESSENTIAL OILS ANALYSIS<br />
The analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils by means <strong>of</strong> GC began in the 1950s, when pr<strong>of</strong>essor Liberti [31] started<br />
analyzing citrus essential oils only a few years after James <strong>and</strong> Martin first described gas–liquid<br />
chromatography (GLC), commonly referred to as GC [32], a milestone in the evolution <strong>of</strong> instrumental<br />
chromatographic methods.<br />
After its introduction, GC developed at a phenomenal rate, growing from a simple research novelty<br />
to a highly sophisticated instrument. Moreover, the current-day requirements for high resolution<br />
<strong>and</strong> trace analysis are satisfied by modern column technology. In particular, inert, thermostable,<br />
<strong>and</strong> efficient open-tubular columns are available, along with associated selective detectors <strong>and</strong><br />
injection methods, which allow on-column injection <strong>of</strong> liquid <strong>and</strong> thermally labile samples. The<br />
development <strong>of</strong> robust fused-silica columns, characterized by superior performances to that <strong>of</strong> glass<br />
columns, brings open-tubular GC columns within the scope <strong>of</strong> almost every analytical laboratory.<br />
At present, essential oil GC analyses are more frequently performed on capillary columns,<br />
which, after their introduction, rapidly replaced packed GC columns. In general, packed columns<br />
support larger sample size ranges, from 10 to 20 mL, <strong>and</strong> thus the dynamic range <strong>of</strong> the analysis can<br />
be enhanced. Trace-level components can be easily separated <strong>and</strong> quantified without preliminary<br />
fractionation or concentration. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the use <strong>of</strong> packed columns leads to lower resolution<br />
due to the higher pressure drop per unit length. Packed columns need to be operated at higher<br />
column flow rates, since their low permeability requires high pressures to significantly improve<br />
resolution [33]. It is worthy <strong>of</strong> note that since the introduction <strong>of</strong> fused-silica capillary columns<br />
considerable progress has been made in column technology, a great number <strong>of</strong> papers regarding GC<br />
applications on essential oils have been published.<br />
The choice <strong>of</strong> the capillary column in an essential oil GC analysis is <strong>of</strong> great importance for the<br />
overall characterization <strong>of</strong> the matrix; the stationary phase chemical nature <strong>and</strong> film thickness, as<br />
well as the column length <strong>and</strong> internal diameter, are to be considered. In general, essential oil GC<br />
analyses are carried out on 25–50 m columns, with 0.20–0.32 mm internal diameters, <strong>and</strong> 0.25 mm
158 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
stationary phase film thickness. It must be noted that the degree <strong>of</strong> separation <strong>of</strong> two components on<br />
two distinct stationary phases can be drastically different. As is well known, nonpolar columns<br />
produce boiling-point separations, while on polar stationary phases compounds are resolved according<br />
to their polarity. Considering that essential oil components, such as terpenes <strong>and</strong> their oxygenated<br />
derivatives, frequently present similar boiling points, these elute in a narrow retention time<br />
range on a nonpolar column. In order to overcome this limit, the analytical method can be modified<br />
by applying a slower oven temperature rate to widen the elution range <strong>of</strong> the oil or by using a polar<br />
stationary phase, as oxygenated compounds are more retained than hydrocarbons. However, choosing<br />
different stationary phases may provide little improvement as resolution can be improved for a<br />
series <strong>of</strong> compounds but new coelutions can also be generated.<br />
Considering gas chromatographic analyses using flame ionization detector (FID), thermal conductivity<br />
detector (TCD), or other detectors which do not provide structural information <strong>of</strong> the<br />
analyzed molecules <strong>and</strong> retention data, more precisely retention indices, are used as the primary<br />
criterion for peak assignment. The retention index system was based on the fact that each analyte is<br />
referenced in terms <strong>of</strong> its position between the two n-paraffins that bracket its retention time.<br />
Furthermore, the index calculation is based on a linear interpolation <strong>of</strong> the carbon chain length <strong>of</strong><br />
these bracketing paraffins. The most thoroughly studied, diffused, <strong>and</strong> accepted retention index<br />
calculation methods are based on the logarithmic-based equation developed by Kováts in 1958 [34],<br />
for isothermal conditions, <strong>and</strong> on the equation propounded by van den Dool <strong>and</strong> Kratz in 1963 [35],<br />
which does not use the logarithmic form <strong>and</strong> is used in the case <strong>of</strong> temperature-programming conditions.<br />
Values calculated using the latter approach are commonly denominated in literature as retention<br />
index (I), linear retention index (LRI), or programmed-temperature retention index (PTRI or<br />
I T ), while the ones derived from the former equation are usually referred to as Kováts index (KI).<br />
In general, retention index systems are based on the incremental structure–retention relationship,<br />
namely, that any regular increase in a series <strong>of</strong> chemical structures should provide a regular increase<br />
in the corresponding retention times. This means that the retention index concept is not restricted to<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> n-alkanes as st<strong>and</strong>ards. In practice, any homologous series presenting a linear relationship<br />
between the adjusted retention time, being logarithmic based or not, <strong>and</strong> the carbon number can<br />
be used.<br />
In the characterization <strong>of</strong> volatiles, the most commonly applied reference series is n-alkanes.<br />
However, the latter commonly present fluctuant behavior on polar stationary phases. In consideration<br />
<strong>of</strong> the fact that retention index values are correlated to retention mechanisms, alternative<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ard series <strong>of</strong> intermediate polarity have been introduced, such as 2-alkanones, alkyl ethers,<br />
alkyl halides, alkyl acetates, <strong>and</strong> alkanoic acid methyl esters [22]. Shibamoto [36] suggested the use<br />
<strong>of</strong> polar compounds series, such as ethyl esters, as an alternative. The most feasible choice, when<br />
analyzing volatiles, is to apply reference series as n-alkanes, fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEEs), or fatty<br />
acid methyl esters (FAMEs), employed according to the stationary phase to be used.<br />
Additionally, it is highly advisable to use two analytical columns coated with stationary phases<br />
<strong>of</strong> distinct polarities to obtain two retention index values <strong>and</strong> enhance confidence in assignments<br />
[37–39]. Identifications made on a single column can only be accepted if used in combination with<br />
spectroscopic detection systems. When n-alkanes are used, it is accepted that the reproducibility <strong>of</strong><br />
retention indices between different laboratories are comprised within an acceptable range <strong>of</strong> ±5 units<br />
for methyl silicone stationary phases, <strong>and</strong> ±10 units for polyethylene glycol phases. A further aspect<br />
<strong>of</strong> great importance, which is frequently overseen, is the analytical reproducibility <strong>of</strong> retention<br />
indexes. Moreover, it is worthwhile to highlight that in practice it was found that the use <strong>of</strong> an initial<br />
isothermal hold in the GC oven temperature program does not provide additional resolution [40].<br />
6.3.2 GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY<br />
Mass spectrometry (MS) can be defined as the study <strong>of</strong> systems through the formation <strong>of</strong> gaseous<br />
ions, with or without fragmentation, which are then characterized by their mass-to-charge ratios (m/z)
Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 159<br />
<strong>and</strong> relative abundances [41]. The analyte may be ionized thermally, by an electric field or by impacting<br />
energetic electrons, ions, or photons.<br />
During the past decade, there has been a tremendous growth in popularity <strong>of</strong> mass spectrometers<br />
as a tool for both, routine analytical experiments <strong>and</strong> fundamental research. This is due to a number<br />
<strong>of</strong> features including relatively low cost, simplicity <strong>of</strong> design <strong>and</strong> extremely fast data acquisition<br />
rates. Although the sample is destroyed by the mass spectrometer, the technique is very sensitive<br />
<strong>and</strong> only low amounts <strong>of</strong> material are used in the analysis.<br />
In addition, the potential <strong>of</strong> combined gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) for<br />
determining volatile compounds, contained in very complex flavor <strong>and</strong> fragrance samples, is well<br />
known. The subsequent introduction <strong>of</strong> powerful data acquisition <strong>and</strong> processing systems, including<br />
automated library search techniques, ensured that the information content <strong>of</strong> the large quantities <strong>of</strong><br />
data generated by GC-MS instruments was fully exploited. The most frequent <strong>and</strong> simple identification<br />
method in GC-MS consists <strong>of</strong> the comparison <strong>of</strong> the acquired unknown mass spectra with those<br />
contained in a reference MS library.<br />
A mass spectrometer produces an enormous amount <strong>of</strong> data, especially in combination with<br />
chromatographic sample inlets [42]. Over the years, many approaches for analysis <strong>of</strong> GC-MS data<br />
have been proposed using various algorithms, many <strong>of</strong> which are quite sophisticated, in efforts<br />
to detect, identify, <strong>and</strong> quantify all <strong>of</strong> the chromatographic peaks. Library search algorithms are<br />
commonly provided with mass spectrometer data systems with the purpose to assist in the identification<br />
<strong>of</strong> unknown compounds [43].<br />
However, as is well known, compounds such as isomers, when analyzed by means <strong>of</strong> GC-MS,<br />
can be incorrectly identified; a drawback which is <strong>of</strong>ten observed in essential oil analysis. As is<br />
widely acknowledged, the composition <strong>of</strong> essential oils is mainly represented by terpenes, which<br />
generate very similar mass spectra; hence, a favorable match factor is not sufficient for identification<br />
<strong>and</strong> peak assignment becomes a difficult, if not impracticable, task (Figure 6.1). In order to increase<br />
the reliability <strong>of</strong> the analytical results <strong>and</strong> to address the qualitative determination <strong>of</strong> compositions<br />
<strong>of</strong> complex samples by GC-MS, retention indices can be an effective tool. The use <strong>of</strong> retention indices<br />
in conjunction with the structural information provided by GC-MS is widely accepted, <strong>and</strong><br />
routinely used to confirm the identity <strong>of</strong> compounds. Besides, retention indices when incorporated<br />
to MS libraries can be applied as a filter, thus shortening the search routine for matching results, <strong>and</strong><br />
enhancing the credibility <strong>of</strong> MS identification [44].<br />
According to D. Joulain <strong>and</strong> W. A. König [45], provided data contained in mass spectral libraries<br />
have been recorded using authentic samples, it can be observed that the mass spectrum <strong>of</strong> a<br />
given sesquiterpene is usually sufficient to ensure its identification when associated with its retention<br />
index obtained on methyl silicone stationary phases. Indeed, for the aforecited class <strong>of</strong> compounds,<br />
there would be no need to use a polyethylene glycol phase, which could even lead to<br />
misinterpretations caused by possible changes in the retention behavior <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpene hydrocarbons<br />
as a result <strong>of</strong> column aging or deterioration. Moreover, according to the authors, attention<br />
should be paid to the retention index <strong>and</strong> the mass spectrum registration <strong>of</strong> each individual sesquiterpene,<br />
since many compounds with rather similar mass spectra elute in a narrow range; more<br />
than 160 compounds can elute within 100 retention index units on a methyl silicone-based column,<br />
for example, 1400–1500.<br />
6.3.3 FAST GC FOR ESSENTIAL OIL ANALYSIS<br />
Nowadays in daily routine work, apart from increased analytical sensitivity, dem<strong>and</strong>s are also made<br />
on the efficiency in terms <strong>of</strong> speed <strong>of</strong> the laboratory equipment. Regarding the rapidity <strong>of</strong> analysis,<br />
two aspects need to be considered: (i) the costs in terms <strong>of</strong> time required, for example, as is the case<br />
in quality control analysis, <strong>and</strong> (ii) the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the utilized analytical equipment.<br />
When compared to conventional GC, the primary objective <strong>of</strong> fast GC is to maintain sufficient<br />
resolving power in a shorter time, by using adequate columns <strong>and</strong> instrumentation in combination
160 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
(a) Inten.(×10,000)<br />
1.00<br />
93<br />
0.75<br />
0.50<br />
0.25<br />
0.00<br />
77<br />
91<br />
41<br />
53 65 69 80<br />
136<br />
105<br />
121<br />
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 m/z<br />
(b) Inten.(×10,000)<br />
1.00<br />
93<br />
0.75<br />
0.50<br />
0.25<br />
0.00<br />
53 65 41<br />
80<br />
107 121<br />
77<br />
91<br />
69 136<br />
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 m/z<br />
(c) Inten.(×10,000)<br />
1.00<br />
0.75<br />
0.50<br />
0.25<br />
0.00<br />
41<br />
53<br />
67<br />
79<br />
81<br />
93<br />
107<br />
121<br />
133136 147<br />
161<br />
50 75 100 125 150 175 200<br />
189<br />
204<br />
m/z<br />
(d) Inten.(×10,000)<br />
1.00<br />
121<br />
0.75<br />
0.50<br />
0.25<br />
0.00<br />
41<br />
93<br />
107<br />
67 79<br />
53<br />
81 133 161<br />
136 189<br />
147<br />
204<br />
50 75 100 125 150 175 200 m/z<br />
FIGURE 6.1 Representation <strong>of</strong> the similarity between mass spectra <strong>of</strong> monoterpenes: sabinene (a) <strong>and</strong><br />
b-phell<strong>and</strong>rene (b); <strong>and</strong> sesquiterpenes: bicyclogermacrene (c) <strong>and</strong> germacrene B (d).<br />
with optimized run conditions to provide 3–10 times faster analysis times [46–48]. The technique<br />
can be accomplished by manipulating a number <strong>of</strong> analysis parameters, such as column length,<br />
column I.D., stationary phase, film thickness, carrier gas, linear velocity, oven temperature, <strong>and</strong><br />
ramp rate. Fast GC is typically performed using short, 0.10 or 0.18 mm I.D. capillary columns with<br />
hydrogen carrier gas <strong>and</strong> rapid oven temperature ramp rates. In general, capillary gas chromatographic<br />
analysis may be divided into three groups, based solely on column internal diameter types;<br />
namely, as conventional GC when 0.25 mm I.D. columns are applied, fast GC using 0.10–0.18 mm<br />
I.D. columns, <strong>and</strong> ultrafast GC for columns with an I.D. <strong>of</strong> 0.05 mm or less. In addition, GC analyses<br />
times between 3 <strong>and</strong> 12 min can be defined as “fast,” between 1 <strong>and</strong> 3 min as “very fast,” <strong>and</strong><br />
below 1 min as “ultrafast.” Fast GC requires instrumentation provided with high split ratio injection
Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 161<br />
systems because <strong>of</strong> low sample column capacities, increased inlet pressures, rapid oven heating<br />
rates, <strong>and</strong> fast electronics for detection <strong>and</strong> data collection [49].<br />
The application <strong>of</strong> two methods, conventional (30 m ¥ 0.25 mm I.D., 0.25 mm d f column) <strong>and</strong> fast<br />
(10 m ¥ 0.10 mm I.D., 0.10 mm d f column), on five different citrus essential oils (bergamot, m<strong>and</strong>arin,<br />
lemon, bitter oranges, <strong>and</strong> sweet oranges) has been reported [49]. The fast method allowed the<br />
separation <strong>of</strong> almost the same compounds as the conventional analysis, while quantitative data<br />
showed good reproducibility. The effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the fast GC method, through the use <strong>of</strong> narrowbore<br />
columns, was demonstrated. An ultrafast GC lime essential oil analysis was also performed on<br />
a 5 m ¥ 50 mm capillary column with 0.05 mm stationary phase film thickness [50]. The total analysis<br />
time <strong>of</strong> this volatile essential oil was less than 90 s; a chromatogram is presented in Figure 6.2.<br />
Another technique, ultrafast module-GC (UFM-GC) with direct resistively heated narrow-bore<br />
columns, has been applied to the routine analysis <strong>of</strong> four essential oils <strong>of</strong> differing complexities;<br />
chamomile, peppermint, rosemary, <strong>and</strong> sage [51]. All essential oils were analyzed by conventional<br />
GC with columns <strong>of</strong> different lengths; namely, 5 <strong>and</strong> 25 m, with a 0.25 mm I.D., <strong>and</strong> by fast GC <strong>and</strong><br />
UFM-GC with narrow-bore columns (5 m ¥ 0.1 mm I.D.). Column performances were evaluated<br />
<strong>and</strong> compared through the Grob test, separation numbers, <strong>and</strong> peak capacities. UFM-GC was successful<br />
in the qualitative <strong>and</strong> quantitative analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>of</strong> different compositions with<br />
analysis times between 40 s <strong>and</strong> 2 min versus 20–60 min required by conventional GC. UFM-GC<br />
allows to drastically reduce the analysis time, although the very high column heating rates may lead<br />
to changes in selectivity compared to conventional GC, <strong>and</strong> that are more marked than those <strong>of</strong><br />
classical fast GC. In a further work the same researchers [52] stated that in UFM-GC experiments<br />
the appropriate flow choice can compensate, in part, the loss <strong>of</strong> separation capability due to the heating<br />
rate increase.<br />
Besides the numerous fast GC application on citrus essential oils, other oils have also been<br />
subjected to analysis, such as rose oil by means <strong>of</strong> ultrafast GC [53] <strong>and</strong> very fast GC [54], both<br />
using narrow-bore columns. Rosemary <strong>and</strong> chamomile oils have been investigated by means <strong>of</strong><br />
fast GC on two short conventional columns <strong>of</strong> distinct polarity (5 m ¥ 0.25 mm I.D.) [55]. The latter<br />
25,000<br />
2 4 5 6 9 11<br />
21 32<br />
20,000<br />
19<br />
27<br />
15,000<br />
22<br />
Intensity<br />
10,000<br />
1<br />
13<br />
26<br />
5000<br />
0<br />
16<br />
8<br />
14<br />
15<br />
3 7 10 12 17 18 20<br />
W h = 126 ms W h = 180 ms<br />
30<br />
23<br />
24 25 28 31<br />
29<br />
33<br />
W h = 192 ms<br />
35<br />
34 36<br />
0 12 24 36 48 60 72<br />
Seconds<br />
84<br />
FIGURE 6.2 Fast GC analysis <strong>of</strong> a lime essential oil on a 5 m ¥ 5 mm (0.05 mm film thickness) capillary<br />
column, applying fast temperature programming. The peak widths <strong>of</strong> three components are marked to provide<br />
an illustration <strong>of</strong> the high efficiency <strong>of</strong> the column, even under extreme operating conditions (for peak identification<br />
see on Ref. [50]). (From Mondello, L. et al., 2004. J. Sep. Sci., 27: 699–702. With permission.)
162 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
oil has also been analyzed through fast HS-SPME-GC on a narrow-bore column [56]. Fast <strong>and</strong><br />
very fast GC analyses on narrow-bore columns have also been carried out on patchouli <strong>and</strong> peppermint<br />
oils [57].<br />
6.3.4 GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY-OLFACTOMETRY FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ODOR-ACTIVE<br />
COMPONENTS OF ESSENTIAL OILS<br />
The discriminatory capacity <strong>of</strong> the mammalian olfactory system is such that thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> volatile<br />
chemicals are perceived as having distinct odors. It is accepted that the sensation <strong>of</strong> odor is triggered<br />
by highly complex mixtures <strong>of</strong> volatile molecules, mostly hydrophobic, <strong>and</strong> usually occurring in<br />
trace-level concentrations (ppm or ppb). These volatiles interact with odorant receptors <strong>of</strong> the olfactive<br />
epithelium located in the nasal cavity. Once the receptor is activated, a cascade <strong>of</strong> events is<br />
triggered to transform the chemical-structural information contained in the odorous stimulus into a<br />
membrane potential [58,59], which is projected to the olfactory bulb, <strong>and</strong> then transported to higher<br />
regions <strong>of</strong> the brain [60] where the translation occurs.<br />
It is known that only a small portion <strong>of</strong> the large number <strong>of</strong> volatiles occurring in a fragrant<br />
matrix contributes to its overall perceived odor [61,62]. Further, these molecules do not contribute<br />
equally to the overall flavor pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> a sample; hence, a large GC peak area, generated by a chemical<br />
detector does not necessarily correspond to high odor intensities, due to differences in intensity/<br />
concentration relationships.<br />
The description <strong>of</strong> a gas chromatograph modified for the sniffing <strong>of</strong> its effluent to determine<br />
volatile odor activity was first published in 1964 by Fuller et al. [63]. In general, gas chromatograhyolfactometry<br />
(GC-O) is carried out on a st<strong>and</strong>ard GC that has been equipped with a sniffing port,<br />
also denominated olfactometry port or transfer line, in substitution <strong>of</strong>, or in addition to, the conventional<br />
detector. When a flame FID or a mass spectrometer is also used, the analytical column effluent<br />
is split <strong>and</strong> transferred to the conventional detector <strong>and</strong> to the human nose. GC-O was a<br />
breakthrough in analytical aroma research, enabling the differentiation <strong>of</strong> a multitude <strong>of</strong> volatiles,<br />
previously separated by GC, in odor-active <strong>and</strong> non-odor-active, related to their existing concentrations<br />
in the matrix under investigation. Moreover, it is a unique analytical technique that associates<br />
the resolution power <strong>of</strong> capillary GC with the selectivity <strong>and</strong> sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the human nose.<br />
GC-O systems are <strong>of</strong>ten used in addition to either a FID or a mass spectrometer. With regard to<br />
detectors, splitting column flow between the olfactory port <strong>and</strong> a mass spectral detector provides<br />
simultaneous identification <strong>of</strong> odor-active compounds. Another variation is to use an in-line, nondestructive<br />
detector such as a TCD [64] or a photoionization detector (PID) [65]. Especially when<br />
working with GC-O systems equipped with detectors that do not provide structural information,<br />
retention indexes are commonly associated to odor description supporting peak assignment.<br />
Over the last decades, GC-O has been extensively used in essential oil analysis in combination<br />
with sophisticated olfactometric methods; the latter were developed to collect <strong>and</strong> process GC-O<br />
data, <strong>and</strong> hence, to estimate the sensory contribution <strong>of</strong> a single odor-active compound. The odoractive<br />
compounds <strong>of</strong> essential oils extracted from citrus fruits (Citrus sp.), such as orange, lime, <strong>and</strong><br />
lemon, were among the first character impact compounds identified by flavor chemists [66].<br />
GC-O methods are commonly classified in four categories: dilution, time-intensity, detection<br />
frequency, <strong>and</strong> posterior intensity methods. Dilution analysis, the most applied method, is based on<br />
successive dilutions <strong>of</strong> an aroma extract until no odor is perceived by the panelists. This procedure,<br />
usually performed by a reduced number <strong>of</strong> assessors is mainly represented by CHARM (combined<br />
hedonic aroma response method) [67], developed by Acree <strong>and</strong> coworkers, <strong>and</strong> AEDA (aroma<br />
extraction dilution analysis), first presented by Ullrich <strong>and</strong> Grosch [68]. The former method has<br />
been applied to the investigation <strong>of</strong> two sweet orange oils from different varieties, one Florida<br />
Valencia <strong>and</strong> the other Brazilian Pera [69]. The intensities <strong>and</strong> qualities <strong>of</strong> their odor-active components<br />
were assessed. CHARM results indicated for both the oils that the most odor-active compounds<br />
are associated with the polar fraction compounds: straight chain aldehydes (C 8 –C 14 ),<br />
b-sinensal, <strong>and</strong> linalool presented the major CHARM responses. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, AEDA has
Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 163<br />
been used to investigate the odor-active compounds responsible for the characteristic odors <strong>of</strong> juzu<br />
oil (Citrus junos Sieb. ex Tanaka) [70] <strong>and</strong> dadai (Citrus aurantium L. var. cyathifera Y. Tanaka)<br />
[71] cold-pressed essential oils.<br />
Time-intensity methods, such as OSME (Greek word for odor), are based on the immediate<br />
recording <strong>of</strong> the intensity as a function <strong>of</strong> time by moving the cursor <strong>of</strong> a variable resistor [72]. An<br />
interesting application <strong>of</strong> the time-intensity approach was demonstrated for cold-pressed grapefruit<br />
oil [73], in which 38 odor-active compounds were detected <strong>and</strong>, among these, 22 were considered<br />
as aroma impact compounds. A comparison between the grapefruit oil GC chromatogram <strong>and</strong> the<br />
corresponding time-intensity aromagram for that sample is shown in Figure 6.3.<br />
A further approach, the detection frequency method [74,75], uses the number <strong>of</strong> evaluators<br />
detecting an odor-active compound in the GC effluent as a measure <strong>of</strong> its intensity. This GC-O<br />
method is performed with a panel composed <strong>of</strong> numerous <strong>and</strong> untrained evaluators; 8–10 assessors<br />
are a good agreement between low variation <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>and</strong> analysis time. It must be added that<br />
the results attained are not based on real intensities <strong>and</strong> are limited by the scale <strong>of</strong> measurement. An<br />
application <strong>of</strong> the detection frequency method was reported for the evaluation <strong>of</strong> leaf- <strong>and</strong> woodderived<br />
essential oils <strong>of</strong> Brazilian rosewood (Aniba rosaeodora Ducke) essential oils by means <strong>of</strong><br />
enantioselective-GC-olfactometry (Es-GC-O) analyses [76].<br />
Another GC-O technique, the posterior intensity method [77], proposes the measurement <strong>of</strong> a<br />
compound odor intensity, <strong>and</strong> its posterior scoring on a previously determined scale. This posterior<br />
registration <strong>of</strong> the perceived intensity may cause a considerable variance between assessors. The<br />
attained results may generally be well correlated with detection frequency method results, <strong>and</strong> to a<br />
lesser extent, with dilution methods. In the above-mentioned research performed on the essential<br />
oils <strong>of</strong> Brazilian rosewood, this method was also used to give complementary information on the<br />
intensity <strong>of</strong> the linalool enantiomers [76].<br />
Other GC-O applications are also reported in literature using the so-called peak-to-odor impression<br />
correlation, the method in which the olfactive quality <strong>of</strong> an odor-active compound perceived<br />
by a panelist is described. The odor-active compounds <strong>of</strong> the essential oils <strong>of</strong> black pepper<br />
Response (mV)<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
Limonene<br />
Octanal<br />
Nonanal<br />
Decanal<br />
Citronellal<br />
Linalool<br />
Octanol<br />
Terpenen-4-ol<br />
Neral<br />
2E-Decenal<br />
Dodecanal<br />
Geranial<br />
Nerol<br />
2E, 4E-Decadienal<br />
Geraniol<br />
β-Sinensal<br />
Nootkatone<br />
400<br />
800<br />
1200<br />
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32<br />
Time (min)<br />
FIGURE 6.3 GC-FID chromatogram with some components identified by means <strong>of</strong> MS (top) <strong>and</strong> a time-intensity<br />
aromagram <strong>of</strong> grapefruit oil (bottom). The separation was performed on a polyethylene glycol column<br />
(30 m ¥ 0.32 mm I.D., 0.25 mm film thickness). (From Lin, J. <strong>and</strong> R.L. Rouseff, 2001. Flavour Fragr. J., 16:<br />
457–463. With permission.)
164 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
(Piper nigrum) <strong>and</strong> Ashanti pepper (Piper guineense) were assessed applying the aforecited correlation<br />
method [78]. The odor pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the essential oils <strong>of</strong> leaves <strong>and</strong> flowers <strong>of</strong> Hyptis pectinata (L.)<br />
Poit. was also investigated by using the peak-to-odor impression correlation [79].<br />
The choice <strong>of</strong> the GC-O method is <strong>of</strong> extreme importance for the correct characterization <strong>of</strong> a<br />
matrix, since the application <strong>of</strong> different methods to an identical real sample can distinctly select<br />
<strong>and</strong> rank the odor-active compounds according to their odor potency <strong>and</strong>/or intensity. Commonly,<br />
detection frequency <strong>and</strong> posterior intensity methods result in similar odor intensity/concentration<br />
relationships, while dilution analysis investigate <strong>and</strong> attribute odor potencies.<br />
6.3.5 GAS CHROMATOGRAPHIC ENANTIOMER CHARACTERIZATION OF ESSENTIAL OILS<br />
Capillary GC is currently the method <strong>of</strong> choice for enantiomer analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> enantioselective-GC<br />
(Es-GC) has become an essential tool for stereochemical analysis mainly after the<br />
introduction <strong>of</strong> cyclodextrin (CD) derivatives as chiral stationary phases (CSPs) in 1983 by Sybilska<br />
<strong>and</strong> Koscielski, at the University <strong>of</strong> Warsaw, for packed columns [80], <strong>and</strong> applied to capillary columns<br />
in the same decade [81,82]. Moreover, Nowotny et al. first proposed diluting CD derivatives<br />
in moderately polar polysiloxane (OV-1701) phases to provide them with good chromatographic<br />
properties <strong>and</strong> a wider range <strong>of</strong> operative temperatures [83].<br />
The advantage on the application <strong>of</strong> Es-GC lies mainly in its high separation efficiency <strong>and</strong> sensitivity,<br />
simple detection, unusually high precision <strong>and</strong> reproducibility, as also the need for a small<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> sample. Moreover, its main use is related with the characterization <strong>of</strong> the enantiomeric<br />
composition <strong>and</strong> the determination <strong>of</strong> the enantiomeric excess (ee) <strong>and</strong>/or ratio (ER) <strong>of</strong> chiral<br />
research chemicals, intermediates, metabolites, flavors <strong>and</strong> fragrances, drugs, pesticides, fungicides,<br />
herbicides, pheromones, <strong>and</strong> so on. Information on ee or ER is <strong>of</strong> great importance to characterize<br />
natural flavor <strong>and</strong> fragrance materials, such as essential oils, since the obtained values are<br />
useful tools, or even “fingerprints,” for the determination <strong>of</strong> their quality, applied extraction technique,<br />
geographic origin, biogenesis, <strong>and</strong> also authenticity [84].<br />
A great number <strong>of</strong> essential oils have already been investigated by means <strong>of</strong> Es-GC using distinct<br />
CSPs; unfortunately, a universal chiral selector with widespread potential for enantiomer separation<br />
is not available, <strong>and</strong> thus effective optical separation <strong>of</strong> all chiral compounds present in a matrix<br />
may be unachievable on a single chiral column. In 1997, Bicchi et al. [85] reported the use <strong>of</strong> columns<br />
that addressed particular chiral separations, noting that certain CSPs preferentially resolved<br />
certain enantiomers. Thus, a 2,3-di-O-ethyl-6-O-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-b-CD on polymethylphenylsiloxane<br />
(PS086) phase allowed the characterization <strong>of</strong> lavender <strong>and</strong> citrus oils containing linalyl<br />
oxides, linalool, linalyl acetate, borneol, bornyl acetate, a-terpineol, <strong>and</strong> cis- <strong>and</strong> trans-nerolidol.<br />
On the other h<strong>and</strong>, peppermint oil was better analyzed by using a 2,3-di-O-methyl-6-O-tertbutyldimethylsilyl-b-CD<br />
on PS086 phase, <strong>and</strong> especially for a- <strong>and</strong> b-pinene, limonene, menthone,<br />
isomenthone, menthol, isomenthol, pulegone, <strong>and</strong> methyl acetate. König [86] performed an exhaustive<br />
investigation <strong>of</strong> the stereochemical correlations <strong>of</strong> terpenoids, concluding that when using a<br />
heptakis (6-O-methyl-2,3-di-O-penthyl)-b-CD <strong>and</strong> octakis (6-O-methyl-2,3-di-O-penthyl)-g-CD<br />
in polysiloxane, the presence <strong>of</strong> both enantiomers <strong>of</strong> a single compound is common for monoterpenes,<br />
less common for sesquiterpenes, <strong>and</strong> never observed for diterpenes.<br />
Substantial improvements in chiral separations have been extensively published in the field <strong>of</strong><br />
chromatography. At present, over 100 stationary phases with immobilized chiral selectors are available<br />
[22], presenting increased stability <strong>and</strong> extended lifetime. It can be affirmed that enantioselective<br />
chromatography has now reached a high degree <strong>of</strong> sophistication. To better characterize an<br />
essential oil, it is advisable to perform Es-GC analysis on at least two, or better three, columns<br />
coated with different CD derivatives. This procedure enables the separation <strong>of</strong> more than 85% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
racemates that commonly occur in these matrices [87], while the reversal <strong>of</strong> enantiomer elution<br />
order can take place in several cases. The analyst must be aware <strong>of</strong> some practical aspects prior to<br />
an Es-GC analysis: as is well accepted, variations in linear velocity can affect the separation <strong>of</strong>
Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 165<br />
enantiomeric pairs; resolution (R S ) can be improved by optimizing the gas linear velocity, a factor<br />
<strong>of</strong> high importance in cases <strong>of</strong> difficult enantiomer separation. Satisfactory resolution requires<br />
R S ≥ 1, <strong>and</strong> baseline resolution is obtained when R S ≥ 1.5 [88]. Resolution can be further improved<br />
by applying slow temperature ramp rates (1–2°C/min is frequently suggested). Moreover, according<br />
to the CSP used, the initial GC oven temperature can affect peak width; initial temperatures <strong>of</strong><br />
35–40°C are recommended for the most column types. Furthermore, attention should be devoted to<br />
the column sample capacity, which varies with different compounds; overloading results in broad<br />
tailing peaks <strong>and</strong> reduced enantiomeric resolution. The troublesome separation <strong>and</strong> identification <strong>of</strong><br />
enantiomers due to the fact that each chiral molecule splits into two chromatographic signals, for<br />
each existing stereochemical center is also worthy <strong>of</strong> note. As a consequence, the increase in complexity<br />
<strong>of</strong> certain regions <strong>of</strong> the chromatogram may lead to imprecise ee <strong>and</strong>/or ER values. In terms<br />
<strong>of</strong> retention time repeatability, <strong>and</strong> also reproducibility, it can be affirmed that good results are<br />
being achieved with commercially available chiral columns.<br />
The retention index calculation <strong>of</strong> optically active compounds can be considered as a troublesome<br />
issue due to complex inclusion complexation retention mechanisms on CD stationary phases;<br />
if a homologous series, such as the n-alkanes, is used, the hydrocarbons r<strong>and</strong>omly occupy positions<br />
in the chiral cavities. As a consequence, n-alkanes can be considered as unsuitable for retention index<br />
determinations. Nevertheless, other reference series can be employed on CD stationary phases, such<br />
as linear chain FAMEs <strong>and</strong> FAEEs. However, retention indices are seldom reported for optically<br />
active compounds, <strong>and</strong> publications refer to retention times rather than indices.<br />
The innovations in Es-GC analysis have not only concerned the development <strong>and</strong> applications <strong>of</strong><br />
distinct CSPs, but also the development <strong>of</strong> distinct enantioselective analytical techniques, such as<br />
Es-GC-mass spectrometry (Es-GC/MS), Es-GC-O, enantioselective multidimensional gas chromatography<br />
(Es-MDGC), Es-MDGC/MS, Es-GC hyphenated to isotopic ratio mass spectrometry<br />
(Es-GC/IRMS), Es-MDGC/IRMS, <strong>and</strong> so on.<br />
It is obvious that an enantioselective separation in combination with MS detection presents the<br />
additional advantage <strong>of</strong> qualitative information. Notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing, a difficulty <strong>of</strong>ten encountered is<br />
that related to peak assignment, due to the similar fragmentation pattern <strong>of</strong> isomers. The reliability<br />
<strong>of</strong> Es-GC/MS results can be increased by using an effective tool, namely retention indices. It can be<br />
assumed that in the enantioselective recognition <strong>of</strong> optically active isomers in essential oils, mass<br />
spectra can be exploited to locate the two enantiomers in the chromatogram, <strong>and</strong> the LRI when<br />
possible, enables their identification [89]. In addition, the well-known property <strong>of</strong> odor activity recognized<br />
for several isomers can be assessed by means <strong>of</strong> Es-GC/MS/O <strong>and</strong> can represent an outst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
tool for precise enantiomer characterization (Figure 6.4).<br />
As demonstrated by Mos<strong>and</strong>l <strong>and</strong> his group [90], Es-GC-O is a valid tool for the simultaneous<br />
stereodifferentiation <strong>and</strong> olfactive evaluation <strong>of</strong> the volatile optically active components present in<br />
essential oils. It is worthwhile to point out that the preponderance <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the enantiomers, defined<br />
by the enantiomeric excess, results in a characteristic aroma [91], <strong>and</strong> is <strong>of</strong> great importance for the<br />
olfactive characterization <strong>of</strong> the sample.<br />
6.3.6 LC AND LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY HYPHENATED TO MS IN THE ANALYSIS OF<br />
ESSENTIAL OILS<br />
Some natural complex matrices do not need sample preparation prior to GC analysis, for example,<br />
essential oils. The latter generally contain only volatile components, since their preparation is performed<br />
by SD. Citrus oils, extracted by cold-pressing machines, are an exception, containing more<br />
than 200 volatile <strong>and</strong> nonvolatile components. The volatile fraction represents 90–99% <strong>of</strong> the entire<br />
oil, <strong>and</strong> is represented by mono- <strong>and</strong> sesquiterpene hydrocarbons <strong>and</strong> their oxygenated derivatives,<br />
along with aliphatic aldehydes, alcohols, <strong>and</strong> esters; the nonvolatile fraction, constituting 1–10% <strong>of</strong><br />
the oil, is represented mainly by hydrocarbons, fatty acids, sterols, carotenoids, waxes, <strong>and</strong> oxygen<br />
heterocyclic compounds (coumarins, psoralens, <strong>and</strong> polymethoxylated flavones—PMFs) [92].
166 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Inten.(×10,000)<br />
1.00 41<br />
0.75 55<br />
0.50<br />
69<br />
81<br />
95<br />
(3S)-(–)-β-citronellol<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
0.25<br />
0.00<br />
40<br />
123<br />
109<br />
138<br />
156<br />
50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 m/z<br />
floral, geranium-like odour<br />
LRI 1343<br />
Inten.(×10,000)<br />
1.00 41<br />
0.75 55<br />
0.50<br />
69<br />
81<br />
95<br />
(3R)-(+)-β-citronellol<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
0.25<br />
109<br />
123<br />
citronella oil like odour<br />
138<br />
156<br />
LRI 1346<br />
0.00<br />
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 m/z<br />
FIGURE 6.4 Representation <strong>of</strong> the mass spectra similarity <strong>of</strong> b-citronellol enantiomers.<br />
In some specific cases, the information attained by means <strong>of</strong> GC is not sufficient to characterize<br />
a citrus essential oil, <strong>and</strong> the analysis <strong>of</strong> the nonvolatile fraction can be required. Oxygen heterocyclic<br />
compounds, which are a distinct class <strong>of</strong> flavonoids, can have an important role in the identification<br />
<strong>of</strong> a cold-pressed oil <strong>and</strong> in the control <strong>of</strong> both quality <strong>and</strong> authenticity [92–95]. The analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> these compounds is usually performed by means <strong>of</strong> LC, also referred to as high-performance<br />
liquid chromatography (HPLC), in normal (NP-HPLC) or reversed-phase (RP-HPLC) applications.<br />
The former method, commonly used when the analytes <strong>of</strong> interest are slightly polar, separates analytes<br />
based on polarity by using a polar stationary phase <strong>and</strong> a nonpolar mobile phase. The degree<br />
<strong>of</strong> adsorption on the polar stationary phase increases on the basis <strong>of</strong> analyte polarity, <strong>and</strong> the extension<br />
<strong>of</strong> this interaction has a great influence on the elution time. In general, the interaction strength<br />
is related to the nature <strong>of</strong> the analyte functional groups <strong>and</strong> to steric factors. On the other h<strong>and</strong>,<br />
RP-HPLC is based on the use <strong>of</strong> a nonpolar stationary phase <strong>and</strong> an aqueous, moderately polar<br />
mobile phase. Retention times are therefore shorter for polar molecules, which elute more readily.<br />
Moreover, retention times are increased by the addition <strong>of</strong> a polar solvent to the mobile phase, <strong>and</strong><br />
decreased by the addition <strong>of</strong> a more hydrophobic solvent.<br />
The on-line coupling <strong>of</strong> two columns, namely, a m-Porasil (30 cm ¥ 3.9 mm I.D., with 10 mm<br />
particle size; Waters Corporation; Milford, USA) <strong>and</strong> a Zorbax silica (25 cm ¥ 4.6 mm I.D., with<br />
7 mm particle size; Phenomenex, Bologna, Italy), in the NP-HPLC analysis <strong>of</strong> bitter orange essential<br />
oils with UV detection has been reported. A large number <strong>of</strong> cold-pressed Italian <strong>and</strong> Spanish, commercial<br />
<strong>and</strong> laboratory-made oils, as also mixtures <strong>of</strong> bitter orange with sweet orange, lemon, lime,<br />
<strong>and</strong> grapefruit oils were analyzed [93]. A total <strong>of</strong> four coumarins [osthol (1), meranzin (5), isomeranzin<br />
(6), <strong>and</strong> meranzin hydrate (14)], three psoralens [bergapten (2), epoxybergamottin (3), <strong>and</strong><br />
epoxybergamottin hydrate (13)], <strong>and</strong> four PMFs [tangeretin (8), heptamethoxyflavone (9), nobiletin<br />
(10), <strong>and</strong> tetra-O-methylscutellarein (11)] were identified. In addition, further three unidentified coumarins<br />
(peaks 4, 7, <strong>and</strong> 12) were detected. The bracketed numbers refer to those in Figure 6.5. In<br />
general, Italian essential oils exhibited a higher content <strong>of</strong> oxygen heterocyclic compounds than the<br />
Spanish oils. The use <strong>of</strong> NP <strong>and</strong> RP-HPLC with microbore columns <strong>and</strong> UV detection has also been<br />
reported for lemon <strong>and</strong> bergamot [96], bitter orange <strong>and</strong> grapefruit [97] essential oils. Orange <strong>and</strong>
Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 167<br />
1.60<br />
1.40<br />
8<br />
1.20<br />
1.00<br />
AU<br />
0.80<br />
0.60<br />
0.40<br />
0.20<br />
0.00<br />
i.s.<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
7<br />
9<br />
11<br />
10 12 13 14<br />
15 16<br />
17<br />
20.00<br />
Minutes<br />
40.00<br />
FIGURE 6.5 HPLC chromatogram <strong>of</strong> Italian genuine bitter orange oil. For peak identification, refer to the text<br />
(i.s.—internal st<strong>and</strong>ard). (From Dugo, P. et al., 1996. J. Agric. Food Chem., 44: 544–549. With permission.)<br />
m<strong>and</strong>arin essential oils have also been analyzed by NP <strong>and</strong> RP-HPLC, but with UV <strong>and</strong> spectr<strong>of</strong>luorimetric<br />
detection in series [98]. For the identification <strong>of</strong> chromatographic peaks <strong>of</strong> all the aforementioned<br />
oils, a preparative HPLC was used; the purified fractions were then analyzed by GC-MS<br />
<strong>and</strong> HPLC/MS.<br />
The oxygen heterocyclic compounds present in the nonvolatile residue <strong>of</strong> citrus essential oils<br />
has also been extensively investigated by means <strong>of</strong> high-performance liquid chromatography/<br />
atmospheric pressure ionization mass spectrometry (HPLC/API/MS) [99]. The mass spectra<br />
obtained at different voltages <strong>of</strong> the “sample cone” have been used to build a library. Citrus essential<br />
oils have been analyzed with this system, using an optimized NP-HPLC method, <strong>and</strong> the mass<br />
spectra were compared with those <strong>of</strong> the laboratory-constructed library. This approach allowed the<br />
rapid identification <strong>and</strong> characterization <strong>of</strong> oxygen heterocyclic compounds <strong>of</strong> citrus oils, the detection<br />
<strong>of</strong> some minor components for the first time in some oils, <strong>and</strong> also the detection <strong>of</strong> authenticity<br />
<strong>and</strong> possible adulteration.<br />
Apart from citrus oils, other essential oils have also been analyzed by means <strong>of</strong> LC, such as the<br />
blackcurrant bud essential oil [100]. The latter was fractionated into hydrocarbons <strong>and</strong> oxygenated<br />
compounds <strong>and</strong> the two fractions were submitted to RP-HPLC analysis. Volatile carbonyls consist<br />
<strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the most important compounds for the blackcurrant flavor <strong>and</strong>, hence, were analyzed<br />
in detail. The carbonyls were converted into 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones <strong>and</strong> the mixture <strong>of</strong><br />
2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones was separated into derivatives <strong>of</strong> keto acids <strong>and</strong> monocarbonyl <strong>and</strong><br />
dicarbonyl compounds. Each fraction was submitted to chromatographic investigation.<br />
6.3.7 MULTIDIMENSIONAL GAS CHROMATOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES<br />
In spite <strong>of</strong> the considerable instrumental advances made, the detection <strong>of</strong> all the constituents <strong>of</strong><br />
an essential oil is an extremely difficult task. For example, GC chromatograms relative to complex<br />
mixtures are characterized frequently by several overlapping compounds: Well-known examples<br />
are octanal <strong>and</strong> a-phell<strong>and</strong>rene, as well as limonene <strong>and</strong> 1,8-cineol, on 5% diphenyl–95% dimethylpolysiloxane<br />
stationary phases, while unsufficient resolution is observed between citronellol <strong>and</strong><br />
nerol or geraniol <strong>and</strong> linalyl acetate. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the overlapping <strong>of</strong> monoterpene alcohols
168 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> esters with sesquiterpene hydrocarbons is frequently reported on polyethylene glycol stationary<br />
phases [101]. Hence, the direct identification <strong>of</strong> a component in such mixtures can be a cumbersome<br />
challenge. The use <strong>of</strong> multidimensional gas chromatography (MDGC) can be <strong>of</strong> great help in complex<br />
sample analysis. In MDGC, key fractions <strong>of</strong> a sample are selected from the first column<br />
<strong>and</strong> reinjected onto a second one, where ideally, they should be fully resolved. The instrumentation<br />
usually involves the use <strong>of</strong> a switching valve arrangement <strong>and</strong> two chromatographic columns <strong>of</strong><br />
differing polarities, but generally <strong>of</strong> identical dimensions. Furthermore, when heart-cut operations<br />
are not carried out, the primary column elutes normally in the first dimension ( 1 D) GC system,<br />
while heart-cut fractions are chromatographically resolved on the secondary column [102]. The capillaries<br />
employed can be operated in either a single or two distinct GC ovens, with both GC systems<br />
commonly equipped with detectors.<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> MDGC has also been described in a wide range <strong>of</strong> enantioselective gas chromatographic<br />
applications [103], involving the use <strong>of</strong> chiral selectors as the stationary phase for the determination<br />
<strong>of</strong> ee <strong>and</strong>/or ER, as well as for adulteration assessments.<br />
A fully automated, multidimensional, double-oven GC-GC system has been presented by<br />
Mondello et al. The system is based on the use <strong>of</strong> mechanical valves that allow the automatic multiple<br />
transfers <strong>of</strong> different fractions from the precolumn to the analytical one, <strong>and</strong> the analysis <strong>of</strong> all<br />
transferred fractions during the same gas chromatographic run. A system <strong>of</strong> pneumatic valves emitted<br />
pressure variations in order to maintain constant retention times in the precolumn, even after<br />
numerous transfers. In addition, when the system was not applied in the multidimensional configuration,<br />
the two gas chromatographs could be operated independently. The system has been used for<br />
the determination <strong>of</strong> the enantiomeric distribution <strong>of</strong> monoterpene hydrocarbons <strong>and</strong> monoterpene<br />
alcohols in the essential oils <strong>of</strong> lime [104], m<strong>and</strong>arin [105], <strong>and</strong> lemon [106]. In Figure 6.6, the<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> the latter oil is outlined to illustrate the technique: the chromatogram <strong>of</strong> the lemon oil<br />
obtained on an SE-52 column with the system in st<strong>and</strong>-by position is shown in Figure 6.6a, while<br />
the one attained with the system in the cut position is illustrated in Figure 6.6b. Figure 6.6c shows<br />
the chiral separation <strong>of</strong> the fractions transferred to the main analytical column. Well-resolved peaks<br />
<strong>of</strong> components present in large amounts, as also <strong>of</strong> the minor compounds, were attained through the<br />
partial transfer <strong>of</strong> the major concentration components.<br />
MDGC is a useful approach for the fractionation <strong>of</strong> compounds <strong>of</strong> particular interest in a specific<br />
sample, one <strong>of</strong> its major applicational areas is chiral analysis, using a conventional column as 1 D <strong>and</strong><br />
a CSP capillary in the second dimension ( 2 D). Es-MDGC analysis has been used for the direct<br />
enantioselective evaluation <strong>of</strong> limonene in Rutaceae <strong>and</strong> Gramineae essential oils [107]. It is noteworthy<br />
that (4R)-(+)-limonene <strong>of</strong> high ee values were found in Rutaceae oils, as bergamot, orange,<br />
m<strong>and</strong>arin, lemon, or lime oils, while the (4S)-(-)-isomer was present in higher amounts in the<br />
Gramineae oils, such as citronella or lemongrass. The ratios <strong>of</strong> a-pinene <strong>and</strong> b-pinene enantiomers<br />
were also taken into consideration.<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> Es-MDGC using a primary polyethylene glycol stationary phase, <strong>and</strong> a secondary<br />
heptakis (2,3-di-O-acetyl-6-O-tert-butyldimethylsylil)-b-cyclodextrin, has been applied to rose<br />
oils. The technique proved to be highly efficient for the assessment <strong>of</strong> origin <strong>and</strong> quality control <strong>of</strong><br />
economically important rose oil, using (3S)-(-)-citronellol, (2S,4R)-(-)-cis- <strong>and</strong> trans-rose oxides<br />
as markers [108]. Buchu leaf oil has also been assessed through Es-MDGC, <strong>and</strong> (1S)-menthone,<br />
isomenthone, (1S)-pulegone, (1S)-thiols, <strong>and</strong> (1S)-thiolacetates as enantiopure sulfur compounds<br />
[109]. A further application was reported on mint <strong>and</strong> peppermint essential oils, which contain<br />
(1R)-configured monoterpenoids [110]. Es-MDGC equipped with a 5% diphenyl–95% dimethylpolysiloxane<br />
<strong>and</strong> a 2,3-di-O-methyl-6-O-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-b-CD, as the 1 D <strong>and</strong> 2 D, respectively,<br />
enabled the simultaneous stereodifferentiation <strong>of</strong> menthone, neomenthol, isomenthone,<br />
menthol, neoisomenthol, <strong>and</strong> menthylacetate.<br />
The technique has also been successfully applied to the authenticity assessment <strong>of</strong> various<br />
commercially available rosemary oils [111]. The ER <strong>of</strong> a-pinene, camphene, b-pinene, limonene,<br />
borneol, terpinen-4-ol, a-terpineol, linalool, <strong>and</strong> camphor were measured; moreover, (1S)-(-)-<br />
borneol <strong>of</strong> high enantiomeric purity (higher than 90%) has been defined as a reliable indicator <strong>of</strong>
Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 169<br />
(a)<br />
Volts<br />
0.10<br />
0.08<br />
0.06<br />
0.04<br />
0.02<br />
Sabinene β-Pinene<br />
Limonene<br />
Linalool<br />
Terpinen-4-ol<br />
α-Terpineol<br />
0.10<br />
0.08<br />
0.06<br />
0.04<br />
0.02<br />
Volts<br />
0.00<br />
0<br />
25<br />
Minutes<br />
50<br />
0.00<br />
(b)<br />
0.10<br />
0.10<br />
0.08<br />
*<br />
*<br />
0.08<br />
0.06<br />
0.06<br />
Volts<br />
0.04<br />
*<br />
*<br />
0.04<br />
Volts<br />
0.02<br />
0.02<br />
*<br />
*<br />
0.00<br />
0<br />
Cut 1 Cut 2 Cut 3 Cut 4 Cut 5<br />
50<br />
0.00<br />
(c)<br />
Volts<br />
0.026<br />
0.022<br />
0.018<br />
0.014<br />
0.010<br />
0.006<br />
(+)-β-Pinene (–)-β-Pinene<br />
(+)-Sabinene (–)-Sabinene<br />
(–)-Limonene (+)-Limonene<br />
(–)-Linalol<br />
(+)-Linalol<br />
(+)-Terpinen-4-ol<br />
(–)-Terpinen-4-ol<br />
(–)-α-Terpineol<br />
(+)-α-Terpineol<br />
0.026<br />
0.022<br />
0.018<br />
0.014<br />
0.010<br />
0.006<br />
Volts<br />
0.002<br />
0.002<br />
15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55<br />
Minutes<br />
FIGURE 6.6 GC chromatogram <strong>of</strong> cold-pressed lemon oil obtained on an SE-52 column (a), GC chromatogram<br />
<strong>of</strong> cold-pressed lemon oil obtained on an SE-52 column with five heart-cuts (b), <strong>and</strong> GC-GC chiral<br />
chromatogram <strong>of</strong> the transferred components (c). (From Mondello, L. et al., 1999. J. High Res. Chromatogr.,<br />
22: 350–356. With permission.)
170 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
genuine rosemary oils. A recently created high-performance MDGC system has been recently used<br />
in this specific field <strong>of</strong> essential oil research [111]. A conventional method <strong>and</strong> a fast MDGC method<br />
were developed <strong>and</strong> applied to the enantioselective analysis <strong>of</strong> rosemary oil. Prior to “heart-cutting,”<br />
a “st<strong>and</strong>-by” analysis was carried out in order to define the retention time cutting windows <strong>of</strong> the<br />
chiral components to be reanalyzed in the 2 D; retention time windows <strong>of</strong> eight peaks were defined.<br />
The eight peaks (camphene, b-pinene, sabinene, limonene, camphor, isoborneol, borneol, terpinen-<br />
4-ol, <strong>and</strong> a-terpineol) were then cut <strong>and</strong> transferred. It must be added that, in some cases, only a<br />
portion <strong>of</strong> the entire peak, that is, limonene, was diverted onto the secondary column. The fast<br />
MDGC method was applied on a twin set <strong>of</strong> 0.1 mm I.D. microbore columns with the objective <strong>of</strong><br />
reproducing the conventional analytical result in a much shorter time (Figure 6.7). The overall runtime<br />
requested for the conventional analysis was <strong>of</strong> 43 min, while it was <strong>of</strong> 8.7 min for the fast<br />
MDGC application, with a speed gain <strong>of</strong> nearly a factor <strong>of</strong> five.<br />
MDGC heart-cutting methods, using valve <strong>and</strong> valveless flow switching interfaces, extend the<br />
separation power <strong>of</strong> capillary GC, although the 2 D analysis can only be restricted to a few regions<br />
UV(×10,000)<br />
2.5<br />
Chromatogram<br />
1<br />
4<br />
5<br />
7<br />
9<br />
E<br />
2.0<br />
1.5<br />
A<br />
2+3<br />
C<br />
8<br />
1.0<br />
0.5<br />
B<br />
D<br />
6<br />
0.0<br />
1.5<br />
2.0<br />
2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 min<br />
UV(×10,000)<br />
Chromatogram<br />
(+)2<br />
(–)1<br />
4.0 (+)1 (–)2<br />
(+)5<br />
(–)5<br />
(–)7<br />
3.0<br />
2.0<br />
1.0<br />
0.0<br />
(+/–)3<br />
(–)4<br />
(+)4<br />
(+)6<br />
(–)6<br />
4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 min<br />
(+)7<br />
(–)8<br />
(+)8<br />
(–)9<br />
(+)9<br />
FIGURE 6.7 A 4.5 min chromatogram expansion relative to the fast MDGC rosemary analysis with the<br />
transfer system in st<strong>and</strong>-by position (top); tricyclene (peak A), a-phell<strong>and</strong>rene (peak B), unknown (peak C),<br />
a-terpinolene (peak D), <strong>and</strong> bornyl acetate (peak E). A 5 min 2 D chromatogram expansion relative to the fast<br />
MDGC rosemary oil application (bottom); the peak numbers refer to camphene (1), b-pinene (2), sabinene (3),<br />
limonene (4), camphor (5), isoborneol (6), borneol (7), terpinen-4-ol (8), <strong>and</strong> a-terpineol (9). (From Mondello, L.<br />
et al., 2006. J. Chromatogr. A, 1105: 11–16. With permission.)
Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 171<br />
<strong>of</strong> the chromatogram. In order to attain a complete two-dimensional characterization <strong>of</strong> a sample, a<br />
comprehensive approach, such as comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC ¥ GC),<br />
has to be used.<br />
GC ¥ GC produces an orthogonal two-column separation, with the complete sample transfer<br />
achieved by means <strong>of</strong> a modulator; the latter entraps, refocuses, <strong>and</strong> releases fractions <strong>of</strong> the GC effluent<br />
from the 1 D, onto the 2 D column, in a continuous mode; this method enables an accurate screening<br />
<strong>of</strong> complex matrices, <strong>of</strong>fering very high resolution <strong>and</strong> enhanced detection sensitivity [112,113]. The<br />
two columns must possess different separation mechanism, commonly a low polarity or nonpolar<br />
column is used in the 1 D, <strong>and</strong> a polar column is used as the fast 2 D column. Moreover, a two-dimensional<br />
separation can be defined as comprehensive if other two conditions are respected [114,115],<br />
namely, equal percentages (either 100% or less) <strong>of</strong> all sample components pass through both columns<br />
<strong>and</strong> eventually reach the detector; <strong>and</strong> the resolution obtained in the 1 D is essentially maintained.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the first applications <strong>of</strong> GC ¥ GC to essential oils was performed by Dim<strong>and</strong>ja et al. [116],<br />
who investigated the separation <strong>of</strong> peppermint (Mentha piperita) <strong>and</strong> spearmint (Mentha spicata)<br />
essential oil components. The latter oil is mainly characterized by four major components, that is,<br />
carvone, menthol, limonene, <strong>and</strong> menthone, while the former is mainly represented by menthol,<br />
menthone, menthylacetate, <strong>and</strong> eucalyptol. Both essential oils were considered as being <strong>of</strong> moderate<br />
complexity, containing
172 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Injector<br />
Modulation<br />
device<br />
Detector<br />
Support guides<br />
CO 2 , N 2 supply <strong>and</strong><br />
movement arm<br />
Cryogenic trap<br />
Retaining nut<br />
Capillary column<br />
FIGURE 6.9 Scheme <strong>of</strong> the LMCS located inside a GC oven. (From Marriott, P. et al., 2000. Flavour Fragr. J.,<br />
15: 225–239. With permission.)<br />
cryotrap is presented; the columns are anchored with retaining nuts to the support frame so that the<br />
trap can move up <strong>and</strong> down along the column, its movement is controlled by a stepper motor. Liquid<br />
cryogen is supplied to the inlet <strong>of</strong> the trap, passing through a narrow restrictor <strong>and</strong> exp<strong>and</strong>ing to cool<br />
the body <strong>of</strong> the trap. A secondary, small flow <strong>of</strong> nitrogen passing through the center <strong>of</strong> the body prevents<br />
the build up <strong>of</strong> ice which would otherwise freeze the column to the trap [118]. Analysis were<br />
performed on a 5% phenyl–95% dimethylpolysiloxane 1 D column (25 m ¥ 0.25 mm I.D., 0.25 mm d f )<br />
connected to a 50% phenyl–50% dimethylpolysiloxane 2 D column (0.8 m ¥ 0.1 mm I.D., 0.1 mm d f ),<br />
applying a modulation frequency <strong>of</strong> 4 s cycle. About 200 compounds could be detected by means <strong>of</strong><br />
GC ¥ GC analysis. The authors reported that the GC-MS analysis <strong>of</strong> vetiver oil, with peak deconvolution,<br />
would still not have been sufficient for the identification <strong>of</strong> coeluting substances.<br />
French lavender (Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia) <strong>and</strong> tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia), essential oils<br />
were also submitted to GC ¥ GC analyses using a nonpolar (5% phenyl–95% dimethylpolysiloxane)–<br />
polar (polyethylene glycol) column set [119]. The work, developed using an LMCS, enabled the<br />
determination <strong>of</strong> elution patterns within the 2 D space useful for the correlation <strong>of</strong> component retention<br />
behavior with their chemical <strong>and</strong> structural properties. The GC ¥ GC approach provides higher<br />
sensitivity, greater peak resolution, <strong>and</strong> capacity, as well as an essential oil fingerprint pattern. The<br />
enhanced peak capacity <strong>and</strong> sensitivity <strong>of</strong> GC ¥ GC in the tea tree oil application can be observed<br />
in the conventional GC <strong>and</strong> untransformed GC ¥ GC chromatograms illustrated in Figure 6.10.<br />
Lavender essential oil has been further investigated by means <strong>of</strong> GC ¥ GC retr<strong>of</strong>itted with an<br />
LMCS <strong>and</strong> hyphenated to time-<strong>of</strong>-flight mass spectrometry (GC ¥ GC/TOFMS), thus generating a<br />
three-dimensional analytical approach [120]. The authors outlined that the vacuum effect on the 2 D<br />
column in GC ¥ GC/TOFMS may generate differing retention times with respect to an equivalent<br />
analysis performed on a GC ¥ GC system at ambient pressure conditions. Lavender essential oil was<br />
further investigated through the comparison <strong>of</strong> GC-MS <strong>and</strong> GC ¥ GC analyses [121], as illustrated<br />
in Figure 6.11. At least 203 components were counted in the 2 D separation space, which was characterized<br />
by a well-defined monoterpene hydrocarbon region, <strong>and</strong> a sesquiterpene hydrocarbon<br />
area. The oxygenated derivatives <strong>of</strong> both these groups generally elute closely after the main group<br />
in the 1 D, but due to their wide range <strong>of</strong> component polarities these are found to spread throughout<br />
a broader region <strong>of</strong> the 2 D plane. According to the authors, by using GC ¥ GC the detection <strong>of</strong> subtle
Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 173<br />
(a)<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
Response / pA<br />
30<br />
(b) 20<br />
80<br />
60<br />
(exp<strong>and</strong>ed scale)<br />
40<br />
20<br />
10 20 30 40 50 60<br />
Time / min<br />
FIGURE 6.10 Comparison <strong>of</strong> monodimensional GC <strong>and</strong> pulsed GC ¥ GC result for tea tree oil; both<br />
chromatograms are shown at identical sensitivity. (From Shellie, R. et al., 2000. J. High Resolution<br />
Chromatogr., 23: 554–560. With permission.)<br />
(a)<br />
(b)<br />
5.00<br />
D2 retention time (s)<br />
4.50<br />
4.00<br />
3.50<br />
3.00<br />
2.50<br />
2.00<br />
1.50<br />
1.00<br />
0.50<br />
M<br />
Y<br />
Z<br />
S<br />
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75<br />
D1 retention time (min)<br />
FIGURE 6.11 Reconstructed gas chromatographic trace for a lavender essential oil (a), <strong>and</strong> the twodimensional<br />
separation space for the GC ¥ GC analysis <strong>of</strong> the same sample (b). The minor component Z<br />
overlaps completely from the major component Y in the 1 D; M: monoterpene hydrocarbons, S: sesquiterpene<br />
hydrocarbons. (From Shellie, R. et al., 2002. J. Chromatogr. A, 970: 225–234. With permission.)
174 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
differences in the analyses <strong>of</strong> lavender essential oils from different cultivars should be simplified,<br />
since it could be based on a 2 D pictorial representation <strong>of</strong> the volatile components.<br />
Further relevant essential oil investigations have been performed: the early works using FID,<br />
while the more recent ones using, preferably, a TOFMS as detector. Among the essential oils previously<br />
studied by means <strong>of</strong> GC ¥ GC are peppermint [122] <strong>and</strong> Australian s<strong>and</strong>alwood [123], with<br />
the latter also analyzed through GC ¥ GC/TOFMS in the same work. <strong>Essential</strong> oils derived from<br />
Thymbra spicata [124], Pistacia vera [125], hop [126], Teucrium chamaedrys [127], Rosa damascena<br />
[128], cori<strong>and</strong>er [129], <strong>and</strong> Artemisia annua [130], as well as tobacco [131], have also been<br />
subjected to GC ¥ GC/TOFMS analyses. The references cited herein represent only a fraction <strong>of</strong> the<br />
studies performed by means <strong>of</strong> GC ¥ GC on essential oils.<br />
6.3.8 MULTIDIMENSIONAL LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES<br />
HPLC has acquired a role <strong>of</strong> great importance in food analysis, as demonstrated by the wide variety<br />
<strong>of</strong> applications reported. Single LC column chromatographic processes have been widely applied<br />
for sample pr<strong>of</strong>ile elucidation, providing satisfactory degrees <strong>of</strong> resolving power; however, whenever<br />
highly complex samples require analysis, a monodimensional HPLC system can prove to be<br />
inadequate. Moreover, peak overlapping may occur even in the case <strong>of</strong> relatively simple samples,<br />
containing components with similar properties.<br />
The basic principles <strong>of</strong> MDGC are also valid for multidimensional LC (MDLC). The most common<br />
use <strong>of</strong> MDLC separation is the pretreatment <strong>of</strong> a complex matrix in an <strong>of</strong>f-line mode. The <strong>of</strong>fline<br />
approach is very easy, but presents several disadvantages: it is time-consuming, operationally<br />
intensive, difficult to automate, <strong>and</strong> to reproduce. Moreover, sample contamination or formation <strong>of</strong><br />
artifacts can occur. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, on-line MDLC, though requiring specific interfaces, <strong>of</strong>fers the<br />
advantages <strong>of</strong> ease <strong>of</strong> automation <strong>and</strong> greater reproducibility in a shorter analysis time. In the on-line<br />
heart-cutting system, the two columns are connected by means <strong>of</strong> an interface, usually a switching<br />
valve, which allows the transfer <strong>of</strong> fractions <strong>of</strong> the first column effluent onto the second column.<br />
In contrast to comprehensive gas chromatography (GC ¥ GC), the number <strong>of</strong> comprehensive<br />
liquid chromatography (LC ¥ LC) applications reported in literature are much less. It can be affirmed<br />
that LC ¥ LC presents a greater flexibility when compared to GC ¥ GC since the mobile phase<br />
composition can be adjusted in order to obtain enhanced resolution [132]. Comprehensive HPLC<br />
systems, developed, <strong>and</strong> applied to the analysis <strong>of</strong> food matrixes, have employed the combination <strong>of</strong><br />
either NP ¥ RP or RP ¥ RP separation modes. However, it is worthy <strong>of</strong> note that the two separation<br />
mechanisms exploited should be as orthogonal as possible, so that no or little correlation exists<br />
between the retention <strong>of</strong> compounds in both dimensions.<br />
A typical comprehensive two-dimensional HPLC separation is attained through the connection<br />
<strong>of</strong> two columns by means <strong>of</strong> an interface (usually a high-pressure switching valve), which entraps<br />
specific quantities <strong>of</strong> 1 D eluate, <strong>and</strong> directs it onto a secondary column. This means that the first<br />
column effluent is divided into “cuts” that are transferred continuously to the 2 D by the interface.<br />
The type <strong>of</strong> interface depends on the methods used, although multiport valve arrangements have<br />
been the most frequently employed.<br />
Various comprehensive HPLC systems have been developed <strong>and</strong> proven to be effective for the<br />
separation <strong>of</strong> complex sample components, <strong>and</strong> in the resolution <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> practical problems.<br />
In fact, the very different selectivities <strong>of</strong> the various LC modes enable the analysis <strong>of</strong> complex mixtures<br />
with minimal sample preparation. However, comprehensive HPLC techniques are complicated<br />
by the operational aspects <strong>of</strong> switching effectively from one operation step to another, by data<br />
acquisition <strong>and</strong> interpretation issues. Therefore careful method optimization <strong>and</strong> several related<br />
practical aspects should be considered.<br />
In the most common approach, a microbore LC column in the first <strong>and</strong> a conventional column<br />
in the 2 D are used. In this case, an 8-, 10-, or 12-port valve equipped with two sample loops<br />
(or trapping columns) is used as an interface. A further approach foresees the use <strong>of</strong> a conventional
Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 175<br />
LC column in the first <strong>and</strong> two conventional columns in the 2 D. One or two valves that allow transfers<br />
from the first column to two parallel secondary columns (without the use <strong>of</strong> storage loops) are<br />
used as interface.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the best examples <strong>of</strong> the application <strong>of</strong> comprehensive NPLC ¥ RPLC in essential oil<br />
analysis is represented by the analysis <strong>of</strong> oxygen heterocyclic components in cold-pressed lemon oil,<br />
by using a normal phase with a microbore silica column in the 1 D <strong>and</strong> a monolithic C18 column in<br />
the 2 D with a 10-port switching valve as interface [133]. In Figure 6.12, an NPLC ¥ RPLC separation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the oxygen heterocyclic fraction <strong>of</strong> a lemon oil sample is presented. Oxygen heterocyclic<br />
components (coumarins, psoralens, <strong>and</strong> PMFs) represent the main part <strong>of</strong> the nonvolatile fraction <strong>of</strong><br />
cold-pressed citrus oils. Their structures <strong>and</strong> substituents have an important role in the characterization<br />
<strong>of</strong> these oils. Positive peak identification <strong>of</strong> these compounds was obtained by both the relative<br />
location <strong>of</strong> the peaks in the two-dimensional plane, which varied in relation to their chemical structure,<br />
<strong>and</strong> by characteristic UV spectra. In a later experiment, a similar setup was used for a citrus<br />
oil extract composed <strong>of</strong> lemon <strong>and</strong> orange oil [134]. The main difference with respect to the earlier<br />
published work [133] was the employment <strong>of</strong> a bonded-phase (diol) column in the 1 D. Under optimized<br />
LC conditions, the high degree <strong>of</strong> orthogonality between the NP <strong>and</strong> RP systems tested,<br />
resulted in increased 2 D peak capacity.<br />
A novel approach for the analysis <strong>of</strong> carotenoids, pigments mainly distributed in plant-derived<br />
foods, especially in orange <strong>and</strong> m<strong>and</strong>arin essential oils, has been recently developed by Dugo et al.<br />
[135,136]. In terms <strong>of</strong> structures, food carotenoids are polyene hydrocarbons, characterized by a C 40<br />
skeleton that derives from eight isoprene units. They present an extended conjugated double bond<br />
(DB) system that is responsible for the yellow, orange, or red colors in plants <strong>and</strong> are notable for their<br />
wide distribution, structural diversity, <strong>and</strong> various functions. Carotenoids are usually classified in<br />
two main groups: hydrocarbon carotenoids, known as carotenes (e.g., b-carotene <strong>and</strong> lycopene), <strong>and</strong><br />
oxygenated carotenoids, known as xanthophylls (e.g., b-cryptoxanthin <strong>and</strong> lutein). The elucidation<br />
<strong>of</strong> carotenoid patterns is particularly challenging, because <strong>of</strong> the complex composition <strong>of</strong> carotenoids<br />
in natural matrices, their great structural diversity, <strong>and</strong> their extreme instability. An innovative comprehensive<br />
dual-gradient elution HPLC system was employed using an NPLC ¥ RPLC setup, composed<br />
<strong>of</strong> silica <strong>and</strong> C18 columns in the 1 D <strong>and</strong> 2 D, respectively. Free carotenoids in orange essential<br />
oil <strong>and</strong> juice (after saponification), were identified by combining the two-dimensional retention data<br />
1.000<br />
0.875<br />
0.750<br />
2<br />
5<br />
0.625<br />
4<br />
8<br />
0.500<br />
0.375<br />
0.250<br />
1<br />
3<br />
7<br />
9<br />
0.125<br />
6<br />
10 11<br />
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45<br />
min<br />
FIGURE 6.12 Comprehensive NP (adsorption)-LC ¥ RP-LC separation <strong>of</strong> the oxygen heterocyclic fraction<br />
<strong>of</strong> a lemon oil sample (for peak identification see Ref. [133]). (From Dugo, P. et al., 2004. Anal. Chem., 73:<br />
2525–2530. With permission.)
176 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
t R (RP), sec<br />
120.0<br />
106.7<br />
93.4<br />
80.0<br />
66.7<br />
53.4<br />
40.0<br />
26.7<br />
13.4<br />
Hydrocarbons<br />
2<br />
1<br />
8<br />
7<br />
10<br />
13<br />
9<br />
Mono-ol<br />
mono-epoxides<br />
Mono-ols<br />
Di-ols<br />
17<br />
16<br />
12<br />
27<br />
21<br />
23<br />
19<br />
28<br />
20<br />
14<br />
15<br />
18<br />
22<br />
26<br />
41<br />
25 33 36 43<br />
32<br />
30<br />
40<br />
49<br />
42 53<br />
35<br />
38<br />
45<br />
31 44 52<br />
50 51 55 60<br />
59<br />
34<br />
Di-ol mono-epoxides<br />
Di-ol mono-epoxides<br />
54<br />
56 62<br />
57<br />
Di-ol di-epoxides<br />
63<br />
61<br />
64<br />
68<br />
70<br />
66 69 73<br />
UV at 450 nm<br />
Tri-ols +<br />
Tri-ol mono-epoxides<br />
75<br />
0<br />
8.5<br />
17.1 25.6 34.1 42.6 51.2 59.7 68.2 76.7 85.3 93.8 102.3 110.8 119.4 127.9 136.4 144.9 153.5<br />
t R (NP), min<br />
FIGURE 6.13 Contour plot <strong>of</strong> the comprehensive HPLC analyses <strong>of</strong> carotenoids present in sweet orange<br />
essential oil with peaks <strong>and</strong> compound classes indicated (for peak identification see Ref. 136). (From Dugo, P.<br />
et al., 2006. Anal. Chem., 78: 7743–7750. With permission.)<br />
with UV-visible spectra [136] obtained by using a photodiode array detection (DAD) detector<br />
(Figure 6.13). A recent study <strong>of</strong> the carotenoid fraction <strong>of</strong> a saponified m<strong>and</strong>arin oil has been<br />
performed by means <strong>of</strong> comprehensive LC, in which a 1 D microbore silica column was applied for<br />
the determination <strong>of</strong> free carotenoids, <strong>and</strong> a cyanopropyl column for the separation <strong>of</strong> esters; a monolithic<br />
column was used in the 2 D [135]. Detection was performed by connecting a DAD system in<br />
parallel with an MS detection system operated in the atmospheric pressure chemical ionization<br />
(APCI) positive-ion mode. Thus, the identification <strong>of</strong> free carotenoid <strong>and</strong> carotenoid esters was<br />
carried out by combining the information provided by the DAD <strong>and</strong> MS systems, <strong>and</strong> the peak positions<br />
in the two-dimensional chromatograms.<br />
6.3.9 ON-LINE COUPLED LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY-GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY (LC-GC)<br />
The analysis <strong>of</strong> very complex mixtures is <strong>of</strong>ten troublesome due to the variety <strong>of</strong> chemical classes to<br />
which the samples components belong to, <strong>and</strong> to their wide range <strong>of</strong> concentrations. As such, several<br />
compounds cannot be resolved by monodimensional GC. In this respect, less complex <strong>and</strong> more<br />
homogeneous mixtures can be attained by the fractionation <strong>of</strong> the matrix by means <strong>of</strong> LC prior to GC<br />
separation. The multidimensional LC-GC approach combines the selectivity <strong>of</strong> the LC separation<br />
with the high efficiency <strong>and</strong> sensitivity <strong>of</strong> GC separation, enabling the separation <strong>of</strong> compounds with<br />
similar physicochemical properties in samples characterized by a great number <strong>of</strong> chemical classes.<br />
For the highly volatile components, commonly present in essential oils, the most adequate transfer<br />
technique is partially concurrent eluent evaporation [137]. In the latter technique, proposed by Grob, a<br />
retention gap is installed, followed by a few meters <strong>of</strong> precolumn <strong>and</strong> the analytical capillary GC<br />
column, both with identical stationary phase, for the separation <strong>of</strong> the LC fractionated components. A<br />
vapor exit is placed between the precolumn <strong>and</strong> the analytical column, allowing partial evaporation <strong>of</strong><br />
the solvent. Hence, column <strong>and</strong> detector overloading are avoided. This transfer technique can be applied<br />
to the analysis <strong>of</strong> GC components with a boiling point <strong>of</strong> at least 50°C higher than the solvent.
Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 177<br />
The composition <strong>of</strong> citrus essential oils has been greatly exploited by means <strong>of</strong> LC-GC, <strong>and</strong> the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> new methods for the study <strong>of</strong> single classes <strong>of</strong> components has been well reported.<br />
The aldehyde composition in sweet orange oil has been investigated [138], as also industrial citrus<br />
oil mono- <strong>and</strong> sesquiterpene hydrocarbons [139], <strong>and</strong> the enantiomeric distribution <strong>of</strong> monoterpene<br />
alcohols in lemon, m<strong>and</strong>arin, sweet orange, <strong>and</strong> bitter orange oils [140,141].<br />
The hyphenation <strong>of</strong> LC-GC systems to mass spectrometric detectors has also been reported for<br />
the analyses <strong>of</strong> neroli [142], bitter <strong>and</strong> sweet oranges, lemon, <strong>and</strong> petitgrain m<strong>and</strong>arin oils [143]. It<br />
has to be highlighted that the preliminary LC separation, which reduces mutual component interference,<br />
greatly simplifies MS identification.<br />
6.4 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS ON ESSENTIAL OIL ANALYSIS<br />
As evidenced by the numerous techniques described in the present contribution, chromatography,<br />
especially GC, has evolved into the dominant method for essential oil analysis. This is to be expected<br />
because the complexity <strong>of</strong> the samples must be unraveled by some type <strong>of</strong> separation, before the<br />
sample constituents can be measured <strong>and</strong> characterized; in this respect, GC provides the greatest<br />
resolving power for most <strong>of</strong> these volatile mixtures.<br />
In the past, a vast number <strong>of</strong> investigations have been carried out on essential oils, <strong>and</strong> many <strong>of</strong><br />
these natural ingredients have been investigated following the introduction <strong>of</strong> GC-MS, which<br />
marked a real turning point in the study <strong>of</strong> volatile molecules. Es-GC also represented a l<strong>and</strong>mark<br />
in the detection <strong>of</strong> adulterations, <strong>and</strong> in the cases where the latter technique could fail, gas chromatography<br />
correlated to isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-IRMS) by means <strong>of</strong> a combustion interface<br />
has proved to be a valuable method to evaluate the genuineness <strong>of</strong> natural product components.<br />
In addition, the introduction <strong>of</strong> GC-O was a breakthrough in analytical aroma research, enabling<br />
the differentiation <strong>of</strong> a multitude <strong>of</strong> volatiles in odor-active <strong>and</strong> non-odor-active, according to their<br />
existing concentrations in a matrix. The investigation <strong>of</strong> the nonvolatile fraction <strong>of</strong> essential oils, by<br />
means <strong>of</strong> LC <strong>and</strong> its related hyphenated techniques, contributed greatly toward the progress <strong>of</strong><br />
the knowledge on essential oils. Many extraction techniques have also been developed, boosting the<br />
attained results. Moreover, the continuous dem<strong>and</strong> for new synthetic compounds reproducing<br />
the sensations elicited by natural flavors triggered analytical investigations toward the attainment <strong>of</strong><br />
information on scarcely known properties <strong>of</strong> well-known matrices.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1. Rowe, D.J., 2005. Introduction. In Chemistry <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>of</strong> Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances, Chap. 1, D.J.<br />
Rowe (ed.). Oxford: The Blackwell Publishing.<br />
2. Parry, E.J., 1908. The Chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> <strong>and</strong> Artifi cial Perfumes, 2nd ed. London: Scott,<br />
Greenwood & Son.<br />
3. Semmler, F.W., 1906–1907. Die Ätherischen Öle, Vol. I to IV, 3rd ed. Leipzig: Verlag von Veit.<br />
4. Gildemeister, E. <strong>and</strong> F.R. H<strong>of</strong>fman, 1950. Die Ätherischen Öle, Vol. 1, 3rd ed. Leipzig: Verlag Von<br />
Schimmel & Co.<br />
5. Finnemore, H., 1926. The <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, 1st ed. London: Ernest Benn.<br />
6. Guenther, E., 1972. The <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>—Vol. 1: History—Origin in Plants Production—Analysis, reprint<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1st ed. (1948). Florida: Krieger Publishing Company.<br />
7. Croteau, R., T.M. Kutchan, <strong>and</strong> N.G. Lewis, 2000. Natural products (secondary metabolites). In<br />
Biochemistry & Molecular Biology <strong>of</strong> Plants, Chap. 24, 1st ed., B. Buchanan, W. Gruissen, <strong>and</strong> R. Jones<br />
(eds). New Jersey: ASPB <strong>and</strong> Wiley.<br />
8. World Health Organisation, 2007. The International Pharmacopoeia (IntPh), 4th ed. Geneva: World<br />
Health Organisation Press.<br />
9. Japanese Pharmacopoeia JP XV. 2007, 15th ed. Tokyo: Yakuji Nippo, Ltd.<br />
10. The Stationery Office, 2007. British Pharmacopoeia BP 2008. Norwich: The Stationery Office (TSO).<br />
11. United States Pharmacopoeia Convention, 2007. The United States Pharmacopoeia USP/NF 2008.<br />
Maryl<strong>and</strong>: United States Pharmacopoeia Convention Inc.
178 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
12. European Directorate for the Quality <strong>of</strong> Medicines & Healthcare (Edqm), 2007. European Pharmacopoeia,<br />
6th ed. Strasburg: European Directorate for the Quality <strong>of</strong> Medicines & Healthcare (Edqm).<br />
13. Sweetman, S. (ed.), 2007. Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference, 35th ed. London: Pharmaceutical<br />
Press.<br />
14. International Organization for St<strong>and</strong>ardization, 1997. ISO 3761-1997, Geneva: International<br />
Organization for St<strong>and</strong>ardization, http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_tc_browse.<br />
htm?commid=48956 (access date December 15, 2007).<br />
15. International Organization for St<strong>and</strong>ardization, 2007. TC 57 <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>. Geneva: International<br />
Organization for St<strong>and</strong>ardization, http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_tc_browse.<br />
htm?commid=48956 (access date December 15, 2007).<br />
16. AFNOR—Association Française de Normalisation, Saint-Denis, http://www.afnor.org (access date<br />
January 11, 2008).<br />
17. Simões, C.M.O. <strong>and</strong> V. Spitzer, 1999. Óleos voláteis. In Farmacognosia: da planta ao medicamento, C.M.O.<br />
Simões, et al. (eds), Chap. 18. Florianópolis: Editora da UFSC <strong>and</strong> Editora da Universidade/UFRGS.<br />
18. Bosart, L.W., 1937. Perfumery <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Record, 28: 95.<br />
19. Beilstein, F., 1872. Ueber den Nachweis von Chlor, Brom und Jod in organischen Substanzen. Ber. Dtscg.<br />
Chem. Ges., 5: 620.<br />
20. P<strong>and</strong>a, H., 2003. <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong>, Chap. 110, 1st ed. New Delhi: National Institute <strong>of</strong> Industrial<br />
Research.<br />
21. Stillman, R.C. <strong>and</strong> R.M. Reed, 1932. Hydroxylamine method for the determination <strong>of</strong> aldehydes <strong>and</strong><br />
ketones in essential oils. Perfumery <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Record, 23: 278.<br />
22. Poole, C.F., 2003. The Essence <strong>of</strong> Chromatography, 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier.<br />
23. Falkenberg, M.B., R.I. Santos, <strong>and</strong> C.M.O. Simões, 1999. Introdução à Análise Fitoquímica. In<br />
Farmacognosia: da planta ao medicamento, Chap. 10, C.M.O. Simões, et al. (eds), 1999. Florianópolis:<br />
Editora da UFSC <strong>and</strong> Editora da Universidade/UFRGS.<br />
24. Wagner, H., S. Bladt, <strong>and</strong> V. Rickl, 2003. Plant Drug Analysis: A Thin Layer Chromatography Atlas,<br />
2nd ed., p. 1. Heidelberg: Springer.<br />
25. Hahn-Deinstrop, E., 2000. Applied Thin Layer Chromatography: Best Practice <strong>and</strong> Avoidance <strong>of</strong><br />
Mistakes, Chap.1, 2nd ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.<br />
26. Sherma, J., 2000. Thin-layer chromatography in food <strong>and</strong> agricultural analysis. J. Chromatogr. A, 880: 129.<br />
27. Richardson, A., 1999. Measurement <strong>of</strong> fragrance perception. In The Chemistry <strong>of</strong> Fragrances, Chap. 8,<br />
D.H. Pybus <strong>and</strong> C.S. Sell (eds). Cambridge: Royal Society <strong>of</strong> Chemistry.<br />
28. Friedrich, J.E., T.E. Acree, <strong>and</strong> E.H. Lavin, 2001. Selecting st<strong>and</strong>ards for gas chromatographyolfacto<br />
metry. In Gas Chromatography-Olfactometry: The State <strong>of</strong> the Art, Chap. 13, J.V. Lel<strong>and</strong>, et al.<br />
(eds). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.<br />
29. Curtis, T. <strong>and</strong> D.G. Williams, 2001. Introduction to Perfumery, Chap. 3, 2nd ed. New York: Micelle Press.<br />
30. Ettre, L.S. <strong>and</strong> J.V. Hinshaw, 1993. Basic Relationships <strong>of</strong> Gas Chromatography, Chap. 4, 1st ed.<br />
Clevel<strong>and</strong>: Advanstar Data.<br />
31. Liberti, A. <strong>and</strong> G. Conti, 1956. Possibilità di applicazione della cromatografia in fase gassosa allo studio<br />
della essenza. In Proc. 1° Convegno Internazionale di Studi e Ricerche sulle Essenze. Italy: Reggio<br />
Calabria.<br />
32. James, A.T. <strong>and</strong> A.J.P. Martin, 1952. Gas–liquid partition chromatography: The separation <strong>and</strong> microestimation<br />
<strong>of</strong> volatile fatty acids from formic acid to dodecanoic acid. Biochem. J., 50: 679.<br />
33. Scott, R.P.W. Gas Chromatography, Chrom Ed. Series, 2001, http://www.chromatography-online.org/<br />
(access date December 15, 2007).<br />
34. Kováts, E., 1958. Gas-chromatographische Charakterisierung organischer Verbindungen. Teil 1: Retentionsindices<br />
aliphatischer Halogenide, Alkohole, Aldehyde und Ketone. Helv. Chim. Acta, 51: 1915.<br />
35. van den Dool, H. <strong>and</strong> P.D. Kratz, 1963. A generalization <strong>of</strong> the retention index system including linear<br />
temperature programmed gas–liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr., 11: 463.<br />
36. Shibamoto, T., 1987. Retention indices in essential oil analysis. In Capillary Gas Chromatography in<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> Oil Analysis, S. S<strong>and</strong>ra <strong>and</strong> C. Bicchi (eds), Chap. 8, 1st ed. Heidelberg: Alfred Huethig Verlag.<br />
37. International Organization <strong>of</strong> the Flavor Industry (I.O.F.I), 1991. The identification <strong>of</strong> individual components<br />
in flavourings <strong>and</strong> flavoured food. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch., 192: 530.<br />
38. Davies, N.W., 1990. Gas chromatographic retention indices <strong>of</strong> monoterpenes <strong>and</strong> sesquiterpenes on<br />
methyl silicone <strong>and</strong> Carbowax 20 M phases. J. Chromatogr., 503: 1.<br />
39. Royal Society <strong>of</strong> Chemistry, 1981. Analytical Methods Committee, Application <strong>of</strong> gas–liquid chromatography<br />
to the analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils, Part VIII. Fingerprinting <strong>of</strong> essential oils by temperatureprogrammed<br />
gas–liquid chromatography using methyl silicone stationary phases. Analyst, 106: 448.
Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 179<br />
40. Royal Society <strong>of</strong> Chemistry, 1980. Analytical Methods Committee, Application <strong>of</strong> gas–liquid chromatography<br />
to the analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils, Part VIII. Fingerprinting <strong>of</strong> essential oils by temperatureprogrammed<br />
gas–liquid chromatography using a Carbowax 20 M stationary phase. Analyst, 105: 262.<br />
41. Todd, J.F.J., 1995. Recommendations for nomenclature <strong>and</strong> symbolism for mass spectroscopy. Int.<br />
J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Process, 142: 209.<br />
42. Vekey, K., 2001. Mass spectrometry <strong>and</strong> mass-selective detection in gas chromatography. J. Chromatogr.<br />
A, 921: 227.<br />
43. McLafferty, F.W., D.A. Stauffer, S.Y. Loh, <strong>and</strong> C. Wesdemiotis, 1999. Unknown identification using<br />
reference mass spectra. Quality evaluation <strong>of</strong> databases. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 10: 1229.<br />
44. Costa, R., M.R. De Fina, M.R. Valentino, P. Dugo, <strong>and</strong> L. Mondello, 2007. Reliable identification <strong>of</strong><br />
terpenoids <strong>and</strong> related compounds by using linear retention indices interactively with mass spectrometry<br />
search. Nat. Product Commun., 2: 413.<br />
45. Joulain, D. <strong>and</strong> W.A. König, 1998. The Atlas <strong>of</strong> Spectral Data <strong>of</strong> Sesquiterpene Hydrocarbons, 1st ed.,<br />
pp. 1–6. Hamburg: E.B.-Verlag.<br />
46. Korytar, P., H.G. Janssen, E. Matisova, <strong>and</strong> U.A.T. Brinkman, 2002. Practical fast gas chromatography:<br />
Methods, instrumentation <strong>and</strong> applications. TrAC, 21: 558.<br />
47. Cramers, C.A., H.G. Janssen, M.M. van Deursen, <strong>and</strong> P.A. Leclercq, 1999. High-speed gas chromatography:<br />
An overview <strong>of</strong> various concepts. J. Chromatogr. A, 856: 315.<br />
48. Cramers, C.A. <strong>and</strong> P.A. Leclercq, 1999. Strategies for speed optimisation in gas chromatography: An<br />
overview. J. Chromatogr. A, 842: 3.<br />
49. Mondello, L., A. Casilli, P.Q. Tranchida, L. Cicero, P. Dugo, <strong>and</strong> G. Dugo, 2003. Comparison <strong>of</strong> fast <strong>and</strong><br />
conventional GC analysis for citrus essential oils. J. Agric. Food. Chem., 51: 5602.<br />
50. Mondello, L., R. Shellie, A. Casilli, P.Q. Tranchida, P. Marriott, <strong>and</strong> G. Dugo, 2004. Ultra-fast essential<br />
oil characterization by capillary GC on a 50 mm ID column. J. Sep. Sci., 27: 699–702.<br />
51. Bicchi, C., C. Brunelli, C. Cordero, P. Rubiolo, M. Galli, <strong>and</strong> A. Sironi, 2004. Direct resistively heated<br />
column gas chromatography (ultrafast module-GC) for high-speed analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>of</strong> differing<br />
complexities. J. Chromatogr. A, 1024: 195.<br />
52. Bicchi, C., C. Brunelli, C. Cordero, P. Rubiolo, M. Galli, <strong>and</strong> A. Sironi, 2005. High-speed gas chromatography<br />
with direct resistively-heated column (ultra fast module-GC)-separation measure (S) <strong>and</strong> other<br />
chromatographic parameters under different analysis conditions for samples <strong>of</strong> different complexities<br />
<strong>and</strong> volatilities. J. Chromatogr. A, 1071: 3.<br />
53. Mondello, L., A. Casilli, P.Q. Tranchida, L. Cicero, P. Dugo, A. Cotroneo, <strong>and</strong> G. Dugo, 2004. Determinazione<br />
della Composizione e Individuazione delle Adulterazioni degli Olii Essenziali mediante<br />
Ultrafast-GC. In Qualità e sicurezza degli Alimenti, pp. 113–116. Milan: Morgan Edizioni Scientifiche.<br />
54. Tranchida, P.Q., A. Casilli, G. Dugo, L. Mondello, <strong>and</strong> P. Dugo, 2005. Fast gas chromatographic analysis<br />
with a 0.05 mm ID micro-bore capillary column. G.I.T. Lab. J., 9: 22.<br />
55. Bicchi, C., C. Brunelli, M. Galli, <strong>and</strong> A. Sironi, 2001. Conventional inner diameter short capillary<br />
columns: An approach to speeding up gas chromatographic analysis <strong>of</strong> medium complexity samples.<br />
J. Chromatogr. A, 931: 129.<br />
56. Rubiolo, P., F. Belliardo, C. Cordero, E. Liberto, B. Sgorbini, <strong>and</strong> C. Bicchi, 2006. Headspace-solid-phase<br />
microextraction fast GC in combination with principal component analysis as a tool to classify different<br />
chemotypes <strong>of</strong> chamomile flower-heads (Matricaria recutita L.). Phytochem. Anal., 17: 217.<br />
57. Proot, M. <strong>and</strong> P. S<strong>and</strong>ra, 1986. Resolution <strong>of</strong> triglycerides in capillary SFC as a function <strong>of</strong> column<br />
temperature. J. High Res. Chromatogr. Chromatogr. Commun., 9: 618.<br />
58. Firestein, S., 1992. Electrical signals in olfactory transduction. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 2: 444.<br />
59. Firestein, S., 2001. How the olfactory system makes sense <strong>of</strong> scents. Nature, 413: 211.<br />
60. Malnic, B., J. Hirono, T. Sato, <strong>and</strong> L.B. Buck, 1999. Combinatorial receptor codes for odors. Cell, 96: 713.<br />
61. Grosch, W., 1994. Determination <strong>of</strong> potent odourants in foods by aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA)<br />
<strong>and</strong> calculation <strong>of</strong> odour activity values (OAVs). Flavour Fragr. J., 9: 147.<br />
62. van Ruth, S.M., 2001. Methods for gas chromatography-olfactometry: A review. Biomolec. Eng., 17: 121.<br />
63. Fuller, G.H., R. Seltenkamp, <strong>and</strong> G.A. Tisser<strong>and</strong>, 1964. The gas chromatograph with human sensor:<br />
Perfumer model. Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 116: 711.<br />
64. Nishimura, O., 1995. Identification <strong>of</strong> the characteristic odorants in fresh rhizomes <strong>of</strong> ginger<br />
(Zingiber <strong>of</strong>i cinale Roscoe) using aroma extract dilution analysis <strong>and</strong> modified multidimensional gas<br />
chromatography-mass spectroscopy. J. Agric. Food Chem., 43: 2941.<br />
65. Wright, D.W., 1997. Application <strong>of</strong> multidimensional gas chromatography techniques to aroma analysis.<br />
In Techniques for Analyzing Food Aroma (Food <strong>Science</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong>), Chap. 5, R. Marsili (ed.),<br />
1st ed. New York: Marcel Dekker.
180 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
66. McGorrin, R.J., 2002. Character impact compounds: Flavors <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>f-flavors in foods. In Flavor,<br />
Fragrance, <strong>and</strong> Odor Analysis, Chap. 14, R. Marsili (ed.), 1st ed. New York: Marcel Dekker.<br />
67. Acree, T.E., J. Barnard, <strong>and</strong> D. Cunningham, 1984. A procedure for the sensory analysis <strong>of</strong> gas chromatographic<br />
effluents. Food Chem., 14: 273.<br />
68. Ullrich, F., W. Grosch, 1987. Identification <strong>of</strong> the most intense volatile flavour compounds formed during<br />
autoxidation <strong>of</strong> linoleic acid. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch., 184: 277.<br />
69. Gaffney, B.M., M. Haverkotte, B. Jacobs, <strong>and</strong> L. Costa, 1996. Charm Analysis <strong>of</strong> two Citrus sinensis peel<br />
oil volatiles. Perf. Flav., 21: 1.<br />
70. Song, H.S., M. Sawamura, T. Ito, K. Kawashimo, <strong>and</strong> H. Ukeda, 2000. Quantitative determination <strong>and</strong><br />
characteristic flavour <strong>of</strong> Citrus junos (yuzu) peel oil. Flavour Fragr. J., 15: 245.<br />
71. Song, H.S., M. Sawamura, T. Ito, A. Ido, <strong>and</strong> H. Ukeda, 2000. Quantitative determination <strong>and</strong> characteristic<br />
flavour <strong>of</strong> daidai (Citrus aurantium L. var. cyathifera Y. Tanaka) peel oil. Flavour Fragr. J., 15: 323.<br />
72. McDaniel, M.R., R. Mir<strong>and</strong>a-Lopez, B.T. Watson, N.J. Michaels, <strong>and</strong> L.M. Libbey, 1990. Pinot noir<br />
aroma: A sensory/gas chromatographic approach. In Flavors <strong>and</strong> Off-Flavors (Developments in Food<br />
<strong>Science</strong> Vol. 24), G. Charalambous (ed.), pp. 23–26. Amsterdam: Elsevier <strong>Science</strong> Publishers.<br />
73. Lin, J. <strong>and</strong> R.L. Rouseff, 2001. Characterization <strong>of</strong> aroma-impact compounds in cold-pressed grapefruit<br />
oil using time–intensity GC–olfactometry <strong>and</strong> GC–MS. Flavour Fragr. J., 16: 457–463.<br />
74. Linssen, J.P.H., J.L.G.M. Janssens, J.P. Roozen, <strong>and</strong> M.A. Posthumus, 1993. Combined gas chromatography<br />
<strong>and</strong> sniffing port analysis <strong>of</strong> volatile compounds <strong>of</strong> mineral water packed in polyethylene laminated<br />
packages. Food Chem., 46: 367.<br />
75. Pollien, P., A. Ott, F. Montigon, M. Baumgartner, R. Muñoz-Box, <strong>and</strong> A. Chaintreau, 1997. Hyphenated<br />
headspace-gas chromatography-sniffing technique: Screening <strong>of</strong> impact odorants <strong>and</strong> quantitative aromagram<br />
comparisons. J. Agric. Food Chem., 45: 2630.<br />
76. d’Acampora Zellner, B., M. Lo Presti, L.E.S. Barata, P. Dugo, G. Dugo, <strong>and</strong> L. Mondello, 2006.<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> leaf-derived extracts as an environmentally sustainable source <strong>of</strong> essential oils by using<br />
gas chromatography-mass spectrometry <strong>and</strong> enantioselective gas chromatography-olfactometry. Anal.<br />
Chem., 78: 883.<br />
77. Casimir, D.J. <strong>and</strong> F.B. Whitfield, 1978. Flavour impact values, a new concept for assigning numerical<br />
values for the potency <strong>of</strong> individual flavour components <strong>and</strong> their contribution to the overall flavour<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ile. Ber. Int. Fruchtsaftunion., 15: 325.<br />
78. Jirovetz, L., G. Buchbauer, M.B. Ngassoum, <strong>and</strong> M. Geissler, 2002. Aroma compound analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
Piper nigrum <strong>and</strong> Piper guineense essential oils from Cameroon using solid-phase microextraction-gas<br />
chromatography, solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry <strong>and</strong> olfactometry.<br />
J. Chromatogr. A, 976: 265.<br />
79. Jirovetz, L. <strong>and</strong> M.B. Ngassoum, 1999. Olfactory evaluation <strong>and</strong> CG/MS analysis <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong><br />
leaves <strong>and</strong> flowers <strong>of</strong> Hyptis pectinata (L.) Poit. From Cameroon. SoFW J., 125: 35.<br />
80. Sybilska, D. <strong>and</strong> T. Koscielski, 1983. b-cyclodextrin as a selective agent for the separation <strong>of</strong> o-, m- <strong>and</strong><br />
p-xylene <strong>and</strong> ethylbenzene mixtures in gas–liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr., 261: 357.<br />
81. Schurig, V. <strong>and</strong> H.P. Nowotny, 1988. Separation <strong>of</strong> enantiomers on diluted permetylated b-cyclodextrin<br />
by high-resolution gas chromatography. J. Chromatogr., 441: 155.<br />
82. König, W.A., 1991. Gas Chromatographic Enantiomer Separation with Modifi ed Cyclodextrins, 1st ed.<br />
Heidelberg: Hüthig.<br />
83. Nowotny, H.P., D. Schmalzing, D. Wistuba, <strong>and</strong> V. Schurig, 1989. Extending the scope <strong>of</strong> enantiomer<br />
separation on diluted methylated b-cyclodextrin derivatives by high-resolution gas chromatography.<br />
J. High Res. Chromatogr., 12: 383.<br />
84. Dugo, G., G. Lamonica, A. Cotroneo, I. Stagno D’Alcontres, A. Verzera, M.G. Donato, P. Dugo, <strong>and</strong><br />
G. Lic<strong>and</strong>ro, 1992. High resolution gas chromatography for detection <strong>of</strong> adulterations <strong>of</strong> citrus coldpressed<br />
essential oils. Perf. Flav., 17: 57–74.<br />
85. Bicchi, C., A. D’Amato, V. Manzin, <strong>and</strong> P. Rubiolo, 1997. Cyclodextrin derivatives in GC separation <strong>of</strong><br />
racemic mixtures <strong>of</strong> volatiles. Part XI. Some applications <strong>of</strong> cyclodextrin derivatives in GC enantioseparations<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oil components. Flavour Fragr. J., 12: 55.<br />
86. König, W.A., 1998. Enantioselective capillary gas chromatography in the investigation <strong>of</strong> stereochemical<br />
correlations <strong>of</strong> terpenoids. Chirality, 10: 499.<br />
87. Bicchi, C., A. D’Amato, <strong>and</strong> P. Rubiolo, 1999. Cyclodextrin derivatives as chiral selectors for direct<br />
gas chromatographic separation <strong>of</strong> enantiomers in the essential oil, aroma <strong>and</strong> flavour fields. J. Chromatogr.<br />
A, 843: 99.<br />
88. Lee, M.L., F.J. Yang, <strong>and</strong> K.D. Bartle, 1984. Open Tubular Column Gas Chromatography, Chap. 2,<br />
1st ed. New York: Wiley.
Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 181<br />
89. Rubiolo, P., E. Liberto, C. Cagliero, B. Sgorbini, C. Bicchi, B. d’Acampora Zellner, <strong>and</strong> L. Mondello,<br />
2007. Linear retention indices in enantioselective GC-mass spectrometry (Es-GC-MS) as a tool to identify<br />
enantiomers in flavour <strong>and</strong> fragrance fields. In Proc. 38th Int. Symp. on <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, Graz.<br />
90. Lehmann, D., A. Dietrich, U. Hener, <strong>and</strong> A. Mos<strong>and</strong>l, 1995. Stereoisomeric flavour compounds LXX,<br />
1-p-menthene-8-thiol: Separation <strong>and</strong> sensory evaluation <strong>of</strong> the enantiomers by enantioselective gas<br />
chromatography/olfactometry. Phytochem. Anal., 6: 255.<br />
91. Boelens, M.H. <strong>and</strong> H. Boelens, 1993. Sensory properties <strong>of</strong> optical isomers. Perf. Flav., 18: 2.<br />
92. Di Giacomo, A. <strong>and</strong> B. Mincione, 1994. Gli Olii Essenziali Agrumari in Italia, Chap. 3. Reggio Calabria:<br />
Baruffa editore.<br />
93. Dugo, P., L. Mondello, E. Cogliro, A. Verzera, <strong>and</strong> G. Dugo, 1996. On the genuineness <strong>of</strong> citrus essential<br />
oils. 51. Oxygen heterocyclic compounds <strong>of</strong> bitter orange oil (Citrus aurantium L.). J. Agric. Food Chem.,<br />
44: 544–549.<br />
94. Mc Hale, D. <strong>and</strong> J.B. Sheridan, 1989. The oxygen heterocyclic compounds <strong>of</strong> citrus peel oils. J. Essent.<br />
Oil Res., 1: 139.<br />
95. Mc Hale, D. <strong>and</strong> J.B. Sheridan, 1988. Detection <strong>of</strong> adulteration <strong>of</strong> cold-pressed lemon oil. Flavour Fragr.<br />
J., 3: 127.<br />
96. Benincasa, M., F. Buiarelli, G. P. Cartoni, <strong>and</strong> F. Coccioli, 1990. Analysis <strong>of</strong> lemon <strong>and</strong> bergamot essential<br />
oils by HPLC with microbore columns. Chromatographia, 30: 271.<br />
97. Buiarelli, F., G.P. Cartoni, F. Coccioli, <strong>and</strong> T. Leone, 1996. Analysis <strong>of</strong> bitter essential oils from orange <strong>and</strong><br />
grapefruit by high-performance liquid chromatography with microbore columns. J. Chromatogr. A, 730: 9.<br />
98. Buiarelli, F., G.P. Cartoni, F. Coccioli, <strong>and</strong> E. Ravazzi, 1991. Analysis <strong>of</strong> orange <strong>and</strong> m<strong>and</strong>arin essential oils by<br />
HPLC. Chromatographia, 31: 489.<br />
99. Dugo, P., L. Mondello, E. Sebastiani, R. Ottanà, G. Errante, <strong>and</strong> G. Dogo, 1999. Identification <strong>of</strong> minor<br />
oxygen heterocyclic compounds <strong>of</strong> citrus essential oils by liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure<br />
chemical ionisation mass spectrometry. J. Liq. Chrom. Rel. Technol., 22: 2991.<br />
100. Píry, J. <strong>and</strong> A. Príbela, 1994. Application <strong>of</strong> high-performance liquid chromatography to the analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
the complex volatile mixture <strong>of</strong> blackcurrant buds (Ribes nigrum L.). J. Chromatogr. A, 665: 104.<br />
101. Dugo, G., K.D. Bartle, I. Bonaccorsi, M. Catalfamo, A. Cotroneo, P. Dugo, G. Lamonica, et al., 1999.<br />
Advanced analytical techniques for the analysis <strong>of</strong> citrus essential oils. Part 1. Volatile fraction: HRGC/<br />
MS analysis. Essenze Derivati Agrumari, 69: 79.<br />
102. Deans, D.R., 1968. A new technique for heart cutting in gas chromatography. Chromatographia, 1: 18.<br />
103. Mos<strong>and</strong>l, A., 1995. Enantioselective capillary gas chromatography <strong>and</strong> stable isotope ratio mass spectrometry<br />
in the authenticity control <strong>of</strong> flavours <strong>and</strong> essential oils. Food Rev. Int., 11: 597.<br />
104. Mondello, L., M. Catalfamo, P. Dugo, <strong>and</strong> G. Dugo, 1998. Multidimensional capillary GC-GC for the<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> real complex samples. Part II. Enantiomeric distribution <strong>of</strong> monoterpene hydrocarbons <strong>and</strong><br />
monoterpene alcohols <strong>of</strong> cold-pressed <strong>and</strong> distilled lime oils. J. Microcol. Sep., 10: 203.<br />
105. Mondello, L., M. Catalfamo, A.R. Proteggente, I. Bonaccorsi, <strong>and</strong> G. Dugo, 1998. Multidimensional<br />
capillary GC-GC for the analysis <strong>of</strong> real complex samples. 3. Enantiomeric distribution <strong>of</strong> monoterpene<br />
hydrocarbons <strong>and</strong> monoterpene alcohols <strong>of</strong> m<strong>and</strong>arin oils. J. Agric. Food Chem., 46: 54.<br />
106. Mondello, L., M. Catalfamo, G. Dugo, G. Dugo, <strong>and</strong> H. McNair, 1999. Multidimensional capillary<br />
GC-GC for the analysis <strong>of</strong> real complex samples. Part IV. Enantiomeric distribution <strong>of</strong> monoterpene<br />
hydrocarbons <strong>and</strong> monoterpene alcohols <strong>of</strong> lemon oils. J. High Res. Chromatogr., 22: 350–356.<br />
107. Hener, U., P. Kreis, <strong>and</strong> A. Mos<strong>and</strong>l, 1990. Enantiomeric distribution <strong>of</strong> a-pinene, b-pinene <strong>and</strong> limonene<br />
in essential oils <strong>and</strong> extracts. Part 1. Rutaceae <strong>and</strong> Gramineae. Flavour Fragr. J., 5: 193.<br />
108. Kreis, P. <strong>and</strong> A. Mos<strong>and</strong>l, 1992. Chiral compounds <strong>of</strong> essential oils. Part XII. Authenticity control <strong>of</strong> rose<br />
oils, using enantioselective multidimensional gas chromatography. Flavour Fragr. J., 7: 199.<br />
109. Köpke, T., A. Dietrich, <strong>and</strong> A. Mos<strong>and</strong>l, 1994. Chiral compounds <strong>of</strong> essential oils XIV: Simultaneous<br />
stereoanalysis <strong>of</strong> buchu leaf oil compounds. Phytochem. Anal., 5: 61.<br />
110. Faber, B., A. Dietrich, <strong>and</strong> A. Mos<strong>and</strong>l, 1994. Chiral compounds <strong>of</strong> essential oils XV: Stereodifferentiation<br />
<strong>of</strong> characteristic compounds <strong>of</strong> Mentha species by multidimensional gas chromatography. J. Chromatogr.,<br />
666: 161.<br />
111. Mondello, L., A. Casilli, P.Q. Tranchida, M. Furukawa, K. Komori, K. Miseri, P. Dugo, <strong>and</strong> G. Dugo,<br />
2006. Fast enantiomeric analysis <strong>of</strong> a complex essential oil with an innovative multi dimensional gas<br />
chromatographic system. J. Chromatogr. A, 1105: 11–16.<br />
112. Liu, Z., <strong>and</strong> J.B. Phillips, 1991. Comprehensive 2-dimensional gas chromatography using an on-column<br />
thermal modulator interface. J. Chromatogr. Sci., 1067: 227.<br />
113. Phillips, J.B. <strong>and</strong> J. Beens, 1999. Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography: A hyphenated<br />
method with strong coupling between the two dimensions. J. Chromatogr. A, 856: 331.
182 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
114. Adahchour, M., J. Beens, R.J.J. Vreuls, <strong>and</strong> U.A.Th. Brinkman, 2006. Recent developments in comprehensive<br />
two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC ¥ GC) IV. Further applications, conclusions <strong>and</strong><br />
perspectives. TrAC, 25: 821.<br />
115. Schoenmakers, P., P. Marriott, <strong>and</strong> J. Beens, 2003. Nomenclature <strong>and</strong> conventions in comprehensive<br />
multidimensional chromatography. LC-GC Eur., 16: 335–339.<br />
116. Dim<strong>and</strong>ja, J.M.D., S.B. Stanfill, J. Grainger, <strong>and</strong> D.G. Patterson, 2000. Application <strong>of</strong> comprehensive<br />
two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC ¥ GC) to the qualitative analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils. J. High Res.<br />
Chromatogr., 23: 208–214.<br />
117. Marriott, P., R. Shellie, J. Fergeus, R. Ong, <strong>and</strong> P. Morrison, 2000. High resolution essential oil analysis<br />
by using comprehensive gas chromatographic methodology. Flavour Fragr. J., 15: 225–239.<br />
118. Marriott, P. <strong>and</strong> R. Kinghorn, 1999. Cryogenic solute manipulation in gas chromatography—the longitudinal<br />
modulation approach. TrAC, 18: 114.<br />
119. Shellie, R., P. Marriott, <strong>and</strong> P. Morrison, 2000. Characterization <strong>and</strong> comparison <strong>of</strong> tea tree <strong>and</strong> lavender<br />
oils by using comprehensive gas chromatography. J. High Resolution Chromatogr., 23: 554–560.<br />
120. Shellie, R., P. Marriott, <strong>and</strong> P. Morrison, 2001. Concepts <strong>and</strong> preliminary observations on the tripledimensional<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> complex volatile samples by using GC ¥ GC-TOFMS. Anal. Chem., 73: 1336.<br />
121. Shellie, R., L. Mondello, P. Marriott, <strong>and</strong> G. Dugo, 2002. Characterisation <strong>of</strong> lavender essential oils by<br />
using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry with correlation <strong>of</strong> linear retention indices <strong>and</strong> comparison<br />
with comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A, 970: 225–234.<br />
122. Cordero, C., P. Rubiolo, B. Sgorbini, M. Galli, <strong>and</strong> C. Bicchi, 2006. Comprehensive two-dimensional gas<br />
chromatography in the analysis <strong>of</strong> volatile samples <strong>of</strong> natural origin: A multidisciplinary approach to<br />
evaluate the influence <strong>of</strong> second dimension column coated with mixed stationary phases on system<br />
orthogonality. J. Chromatogr. A, 1132: 268.<br />
123. Shellie, R., P. Marriott, <strong>and</strong> P. Morrison, 2004. Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography<br />
with flame ionization <strong>and</strong> time-<strong>of</strong>-flight mass spectrometry detection: Qualitative <strong>and</strong> quantitative analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> West Australian s<strong>and</strong>alwood oil. J. Chromatogr. Sci., 42: 417.<br />
124. Özel, M.Z., F. Gogus, <strong>and</strong> A.C. Lewis, 2003. Subcritical water extraction <strong>of</strong> essential oils from Thymbra<br />
spicata. Food Chem., 82: 381.<br />
125. Özel, M.Z., F. Gogus, J.F. Hamilton, <strong>and</strong> A.C. Lewis, 2004. The essential oil <strong>of</strong> Pistacia vera L. at<br />
various temperatures <strong>of</strong> direct thermal desorption using comprehensive gas chromatography coupled<br />
with time-<strong>of</strong>-flight mass spectrometry. Chromatographia, 60: 79.<br />
126. Roberts, M.T., J.P. Dufour, <strong>and</strong> A.C. Lewis, 2004. Application <strong>of</strong> comprehensive multidimensional gas<br />
chromatography combined with time-<strong>of</strong>-flight mass spectrometry (GC ¥ GC-TOFMS) for high resolution<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> hop essential oil. J. Sep. Sci., 27: 473.<br />
127. Özel, M.Z., F. Göğüş, <strong>and</strong> A.C. Lewis, 2006. Determination <strong>of</strong> Teucrium chamaedrys volatiles by using<br />
direct thermal desorption–comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography–time-<strong>of</strong>-flight mass<br />
spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A, 1114: 164.<br />
128. Özel, M.Z., F. Gogus, <strong>and</strong> A.C. Lewis, 2006. Comparison <strong>of</strong> direct thermal desorption with water distillation<br />
<strong>and</strong> superheated water extraction for the analysis <strong>of</strong> volatile components <strong>of</strong> Rosa damascena Mill.<br />
Using GC ¥ GC-TOF/MS. Anal. Chim. Acta, 566: 172.<br />
129. Eyres, G., P.J. Marriott, <strong>and</strong> J.P. Dufour, 2007. The combination <strong>of</strong> gas chromatography–olfactometry <strong>and</strong><br />
multidimensional gas chromatography for the characterisation <strong>of</strong> essential oils. J. Chromatogr. A, 150: 70.<br />
130. Ma, C., H. Wang, X. Lu, H. Li, B. Liu, <strong>and</strong> G. Xu, 2007. Analysis <strong>of</strong> Artemisia annua L. volatile oil by<br />
comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography time-<strong>of</strong>-flight mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr.<br />
A, 1150: 50.<br />
131. Zhu, S., X. Lu, Y. Qiu, T. Pang, H. Kong, C. Wu, <strong>and</strong> G. Xu, 2007. Determination <strong>of</strong> retention indices in<br />
constant inlet pressure mode <strong>and</strong> conversion among different column temperature conditions in comprehensive<br />
two-dimensional gas chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A, 1150: 28.<br />
132. Dugo, P., M.D. Fern<strong>and</strong>ez, A. Cotroneo, <strong>and</strong> G. Dugo, 2006. Optimization <strong>of</strong> a comprehensive twodimensional<br />
normal-phase <strong>and</strong> reversed phase-liquid chromatography system. J. Chromatogr. Sci., 44: 1.<br />
133. Dugo, P., O. Favoino, R. Luppino, G. Dugo, <strong>and</strong> Mondello, L., 2004. Comprehensive two-dimensional<br />
normal-phase (adsorption)-reversed-phase liquid chromatography. Anal. Chem., 73: 2525–2530.<br />
134. François, I.D., A. Villiers, <strong>and</strong> P. S<strong>and</strong>ra, 2006. Considerations on the possibilities <strong>and</strong> limitations <strong>of</strong> comprehensive<br />
normal phase-reversed phase liquid chromatography (NPLC ¥ RPLC). J. Sep. Sci., 29: 492.<br />
135. Dugo, P., M. Herrero, T. Kumm, D. Giuffrida, G. Dugo, <strong>and</strong> L. Mondello, Comprehensive normalphase<br />
¥ reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled to photodiode array <strong>and</strong> mass spectrometry<br />
detectors for the analysis <strong>of</strong> free carotenoids <strong>and</strong> carotenoid esters from m<strong>and</strong>arin. J. Chromatogr. A,<br />
2008, in press.
Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 183<br />
136. Dugo, P., V. Škeříková, T. Kumm, A. Trozzi, P. J<strong>and</strong>era, <strong>and</strong> L. Mondello, 2006. Elucidation <strong>of</strong> carotenoid<br />
patterns in citrus products by means <strong>of</strong> comprehensive normal-phase × reversed-phase liquid chromatography.<br />
Anal. Chem., 78: 7743–7750.<br />
137. Grob, K., 1987. On-line coupled HPLC-HRGC. In Proc. 8th Int. Symp. on Capillary Chromatography.<br />
Italy: Riva del Garda.<br />
138. Mondello, L., K.D. Bartle, G. Dugo, <strong>and</strong> P. Dugo, 1994. Automated HPLC-HRGC: A powerful method<br />
for essential oils analysis. Part III. Aliphatic <strong>and</strong> terpene aldehydes <strong>of</strong> orange oil. J. High Resol.<br />
Chromatogr., 17: 312.<br />
139. Mondello, L., P. Dugo, K.D. Bartle, G. Dugo, <strong>and</strong> A. Cotroneo, 1995. Automated HPLC-HRGC: A powerful<br />
method for essential oils analysis. Part V. Identification <strong>of</strong> terpene hydrocarbons <strong>of</strong> bergamot, lemon,<br />
m<strong>and</strong>arin, sweet orange, bitter orange, grapefruit, clementine <strong>and</strong> Mexican lime oils by coupled HPLC-<br />
HRGC-MS(ITD). Flavour Fragr. J., 10: 33.<br />
140. Dugo, G., A. Verzera, A. Trozzi, A. Cotroneo, L. Mondello, <strong>and</strong> K.D. Bartle, 1994. Automated HPLC-<br />
HRGC: A powerful method for essential oils analysis. Part I. Investigation on enantiomeric distribution<br />
<strong>of</strong> monoterpene alcohols <strong>of</strong> lemon <strong>and</strong> m<strong>and</strong>arin essential oils. Essenz. Deriv. Agrum., 64: 35.<br />
141. Dugo, G., A. Verzera, A. Cotroneo, I. Stagno d’Alcontres, L. Mondello, <strong>and</strong> K.D. Bartle, 1994. Automated<br />
HPLC-HRGC: A powerful method for essential oil analysis. Part II. Determination <strong>of</strong> the enantiomeric<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> linalool in sweet orange, bitter orange <strong>and</strong> m<strong>and</strong>arin essential oils. Flavour Fragr.<br />
J., 9: 99.<br />
142. Mondello, L., P. Dugo, K.D. Bartle, B. Frere, <strong>and</strong> G. Dugo, 1994. On-line high performance liquid chromatography<br />
coupled with high resolution gas chromatography <strong>and</strong> mass spectrometry (HPLC-HRGC-MS)<br />
for the analysis <strong>of</strong> complex mixtures containing highly volatile compounds. Chromatographia, 39: 529.<br />
143. Mondello, L., P. Dugo, G. Dugo, <strong>and</strong> K.D. Bartle, 1996. On-line HPLC-HRGC-MS for the analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
natural complex mixtures. J. Chromatogr. Sci., 34: 174.
7<br />
Safety Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong><br />
<strong>Oils</strong>: A Constituent-Based<br />
Approach<br />
Timothy B. Adams <strong>and</strong> Sean V. Taylor<br />
CONTENTS<br />
7.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 186<br />
7.2 Constituent-Based Evaluation <strong>of</strong> an <strong>Essential</strong> Oil ............................................................. 187<br />
7.3 Scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> Used in Food ............................................................................... 187<br />
7.3.1 Plant Sources ......................................................................................................... 187<br />
7.3.2 Processing <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> for Flavor Functions ................................................ 188<br />
7.3.3 Chemical Composition <strong>and</strong> Congeneric Groups ................................................... 188<br />
7.3.4 Chemical Assay Requirements <strong>and</strong> Chemical Description <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil ......... 190<br />
7.3.4.1 Intake <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Essential</strong> Oil ....................................................................... 191<br />
7.3.4.2 Analytical Limits on Constituent Identification ...................................... 192<br />
7.3.4.3 Intake <strong>of</strong> Congeneric Groups .................................................................. 192<br />
7.4 Safety Considerations for <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, Constituents, <strong>and</strong> Congeneric Groups ............. 193<br />
7.4.1 <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> ......................................................................................................... 193<br />
7.4.1.1 Safety <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>: Relationship to Food ....................................... 193<br />
7.4.2 Safety <strong>of</strong> Constituents <strong>and</strong> Congeneric Groups in <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> ......................... 194<br />
7.5 The Guide <strong>and</strong> Example for the Safety Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> ............................... 195<br />
7.5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 195<br />
7.5.2 Elements <strong>of</strong> the Guide for the Safety Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Essential</strong> Oil .................. 196<br />
7.5.2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 196<br />
7.5.2.2 Prioritization <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil According to Presence in Food ............... 196<br />
7.5.2.3 Organization <strong>of</strong> Chemical Data: Congeneric Groups <strong>and</strong><br />
Classes <strong>of</strong> Toxicity .................................................................................. 197<br />
7.6 Summary ........................................................................................................................... 205<br />
References .................................................................................................................................. 205<br />
As a practical matter, the analytical requirements for the quantification <strong>and</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> chemical<br />
constituents are based on exposure to the essential oil from food <strong>and</strong>/or flavor use. With increased<br />
exposure there is a requirement for lower detection limits <strong>and</strong> therefore identification <strong>of</strong> a greater<br />
number <strong>of</strong> constituents. The flexibility <strong>of</strong> the guide is reflected in the fact that high intake <strong>of</strong> major<br />
congeneric groups <strong>of</strong> low toxicologic concern will be evaluated along with low intake <strong>of</strong> minor<br />
congeneric groups <strong>of</strong> significant toxicological concern. The guide also provides a comprehensive<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> all congeneric groups <strong>and</strong> constituents that account for the majority <strong>of</strong> the composition<br />
185
186 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> the essential oil. The overall objective <strong>of</strong> the guide is to organize <strong>and</strong> prioritize the chemical<br />
constituents <strong>of</strong> an essential oil such that no significant risk associated with the intake <strong>of</strong> essential oil<br />
goes unevaluated. The guide is, however, not intended to be a rigid checklist <strong>and</strong> requires that expert<br />
judgment be applied to ensure that each essential oil is exhaustively evaluated.<br />
7.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
Based on their action on the human senses, plants <strong>and</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> extracts derived from them<br />
have functioned as sources <strong>of</strong> food, preservatives, medicines, symbolic articles in religious <strong>and</strong><br />
social ceremonies, <strong>and</strong> remedies to modify behavior. In many cases, essential oils <strong>and</strong> extracts<br />
gained widespread acceptance as multifunctional agents due to their strong stimulation <strong>of</strong> the human<br />
gustatory (taste) <strong>and</strong> olfactory (smell) senses. Cinnamon oil exhibits a pleasing warm spicy aftertaste,<br />
characteristic spicy aroma, <strong>and</strong> preservative properties that made it attractive as a food flavoring<br />
<strong>and</strong> fragrance. Four millennia ago, cinnamon oil was the principal ingredient <strong>of</strong> a holy ointment<br />
mentioned in Exodus 32:22–26. Because <strong>of</strong> its perceived preservative properties, cinnamon <strong>and</strong> cinnamon<br />
oil were sought by Egyptians for embalming. According to Dioscorides (Dioscorides, first<br />
century ad), cinnamon was a breath freshener, would aid in digestion, counteract the bites <strong>of</strong> venomous<br />
beasts, reduce inflammation <strong>of</strong> the intestines <strong>and</strong> the kidneys, <strong>and</strong> act as a diuretic. Applied<br />
to the face, it was purported to remove undesirable spots. It is no wonder that in 1000 bc cinnamon<br />
was more expensive than gold.<br />
Based on histories <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> selected plants <strong>and</strong> plant products that strongly impact the senses,<br />
it is not unexpected that society would bestow powers to heal, cure diseases, <strong>and</strong> spur desirable<br />
emotions in the effort to improve the human condition, <strong>of</strong>ten with only a limited underst<strong>and</strong>ing or<br />
acknowledgment <strong>of</strong> the toxic effects associated with high doses <strong>of</strong> these plant products. The “natural”<br />
origin <strong>of</strong> these products <strong>and</strong> their long history <strong>of</strong> use by humans have, in part, mitigated concerns<br />
as to whether these products work or are safe under conditions <strong>of</strong> intended use (Arct<strong>and</strong>er,<br />
1969). The adverse effects resulting from the human use <strong>of</strong> pennyroyal oil as an abortifacient or<br />
wild germ<strong>and</strong>er as a weight control agent are reminders that no substances is safe independent <strong>of</strong><br />
considerations <strong>of</strong> dose. In the absence <strong>of</strong> information concerning efficacy <strong>and</strong> safety, recommendations<br />
for the quantity <strong>and</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> natural product to be consumed as a medicine remain<br />
ambiguous. However, when the intended use is as a flavor or fragrance that is subject to governmental<br />
regulation, effective <strong>and</strong> safe levels <strong>of</strong> use are defined by fundamental biological limits <strong>and</strong><br />
careful risk assessment.<br />
Flavors <strong>and</strong> fragrances are complex mixtures that act directly on the gustatory <strong>and</strong> olfactory<br />
receptors in the mouth <strong>and</strong> nose leading to taste <strong>and</strong> aroma responses, respectively. Saturation <strong>of</strong><br />
these receptors by the individual chemicals within the flavors <strong>and</strong> fragrances occurs at very low<br />
levels in animals. Hence, with few exceptions the effects <strong>of</strong> flavors <strong>and</strong> fragrances are self-limiting.<br />
The evolution <strong>of</strong> the human diet is tightly tied to the function <strong>of</strong> these receptors. Taste <strong>and</strong> aroma<br />
not only determine what we eat but <strong>of</strong>ten allow us to evaluate the quality <strong>of</strong> food <strong>and</strong>, in some cases,<br />
identify unwanted contaminants. The principle <strong>of</strong> self-limitation taken together with the long history<br />
<strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> essential oils in food argues that these substances are safe under intended conditions <strong>of</strong><br />
use. In the United States, the conclusion by the U.S. Food <strong>and</strong> Drug Administration (21 CFR Sec.<br />
182.10, 182.20, 482.40, <strong>and</strong> 182.50) that these oils are “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS) for<br />
their intended use was based, in large part, on these two considerations. In Europe <strong>and</strong> Asia, the<br />
presumption <strong>of</strong> “safe under conditions <strong>of</strong> use” has been bestowed on essential oils based on similar<br />
considerations.<br />
For other intended uses such as dietary supplements or direct food additives, a traditional toxicology<br />
approach has been used to demonstrate the safety <strong>of</strong> essential oils. This relies on performing<br />
toxicity tests on laboratory animals, assessing intake <strong>and</strong> intended use, <strong>and</strong> determining adequate<br />
margins <strong>of</strong> safety between daily intake by humans <strong>and</strong> toxic levels resulting from animal studies.<br />
Given the constantly changing marketplace <strong>and</strong> the consumer dem<strong>and</strong> for new <strong>and</strong> interesting
Safety Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 187<br />
products, however, many new intended uses for natural products are required. The resources necessary<br />
to test all natural products for each intended use are simply not economical. For essential oils<br />
that are complex mixtures <strong>of</strong> chemicals, the traditional approach is effective only when specifications<br />
for the composition <strong>and</strong> purity are clearly defined <strong>and</strong> adequate quality controls are in place<br />
for the continued commercial use <strong>of</strong> the oil. In the absence <strong>of</strong> such specifications, the results <strong>of</strong><br />
toxicity testing apply specifically <strong>and</strong> only to the article tested. Recent safety evaluation approaches<br />
(Schilter et al., 2003) suggest that a multifaceted decision-tree approach can be applied to prioritize<br />
natural products <strong>and</strong> the extent <strong>of</strong> data required to demonstrate safety under conditions <strong>of</strong> use.<br />
The latter approach <strong>of</strong>fers many advantages, both economic as well as scientific, over more traditional<br />
approaches. Nevertheless, various levels <strong>of</strong> resource-intensive toxicity testing <strong>of</strong> an essential<br />
oil are required in this approach.<br />
7.2 CONSTITUENT-BASED EVALUATION OF AN ESSENTIAL OIL<br />
Because essential oils are mixtures <strong>of</strong> volatile organic substances <strong>of</strong> known chemical structure that<br />
react, either singly or in combination, with biomolecules (proteins, etc.) to produce biological<br />
responses, it should be possible to relate the intake <strong>of</strong> high doses <strong>of</strong> these substances to observed<br />
toxicity. No attempt has yet been made to evaluate the safety <strong>of</strong> a natural product based on its chemical<br />
composition <strong>and</strong> the variability <strong>of</strong> that composition for the intended use. The chemical constitution<br />
<strong>of</strong> a natural product is fundamental to underst<strong>and</strong>ing the product’s intended use <strong>and</strong> factors<br />
affecting its safety. Recent advances in analytical methodology have made intensive investigation <strong>of</strong><br />
the chemical composition <strong>of</strong> a natural product economically feasible <strong>and</strong> even routine. Highthroughput<br />
instrumentation necessary to perform extensive qualitative <strong>and</strong> quantitative analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
complex chemical mixtures <strong>and</strong> to evaluate the variation in the composition <strong>of</strong> the mixture is now<br />
a reality. In fact, analytical tools needed to chemically characterize these complex mixtures are<br />
becoming more cost effective, while the cost <strong>of</strong> traditional toxicology is becoming more cost intensive.<br />
Based on the wealth <strong>of</strong> existing chemical <strong>and</strong> biological data on the constituents <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oils <strong>and</strong> similar data on essential oils themselves, it is possible to validate a constituent-based safety<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> an essential oil.<br />
As noted above, it is scientifically valid to evaluate the safety <strong>of</strong> a natural mixture based on its<br />
chemical composition. Fundamentally, it is the interaction between one or more molecules in the<br />
natural product <strong>and</strong> macromolecules (proteins, enzymes, etc.) that yield the biological response,<br />
regardless <strong>of</strong> whether it is a desired functional effect such as a pleasing taste, or a potential toxic<br />
effect such as liver necrosis. Many <strong>of</strong> the advertised beneficial properties <strong>of</strong> ephedra are based on<br />
the presence <strong>of</strong> the central nervous system stimulant ephedrine. So too, the gustatory <strong>and</strong> olfactory<br />
properties <strong>of</strong> cori<strong>and</strong>er oil are, in part, based on the binding <strong>of</strong> the linalool, benzyl benzoate, <strong>and</strong><br />
other molecules to the appropriate receptors. It is these molecular interactions <strong>of</strong> chemical constituents<br />
that ultimately determine conditions <strong>of</strong> use.<br />
7.3 SCOPE OF ESSENTIAL OILS USED IN FOOD<br />
7.3.1 PLANT SOURCES<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils, as products <strong>of</strong> distillation, are mixtures <strong>of</strong> mainly low-molecular-weight chemical<br />
substances. Sources <strong>of</strong> essential oils include components (e.g., pulp, bark, peel, leaf, berry, <strong>and</strong><br />
blossom) <strong>of</strong> fruits, vegetables, spices, <strong>and</strong> other plants. <strong>Essential</strong> oils are prepared from foods <strong>and</strong><br />
nonfood sources. Many <strong>of</strong> the approximately 100 essential oils used as flavoring substances in food<br />
are derived directly from food (i.e., lemon oil, basil oil, <strong>and</strong> cardamom oil); far fewer are extracts<br />
from plants not normally consumed as food (e.g., cedar leaf oil or balsam fir oil).<br />
Whereas an essential oil is typically obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the plant or plant part, an<br />
oleoresin is produced by extraction <strong>of</strong> the same with an appropriate organic solvent. The volatile
188 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
constituents <strong>of</strong> the plant isolated in the essential oil are primarily responsible for aroma <strong>and</strong> taste <strong>of</strong><br />
the plant. Hence, borneol, bornyl acetate, camphor, <strong>and</strong> other volatile constituents in rosemary oil<br />
can provide a flavor intensity as potent as the mass <strong>of</strong> dried rosemary used to produce the oil. A few<br />
exceptions include cayenne pepper, black pepper, ginger, paprika, <strong>and</strong> sesame seeds that contain<br />
key nonvolatile flavor constituents (e.g., gingerol <strong>and</strong> zingerone in ginger). These nonvolatile constituents<br />
are <strong>of</strong>ten higher-molecular-weight hydrophilic substances that would be lost in the preparation<br />
<strong>of</strong> an essential oil but are present in the fixed oil <strong>of</strong> an oleoresin. For economic reasons, crude<br />
essential oils are <strong>of</strong>ten produced via distillation at the source <strong>of</strong> the plant raw material <strong>and</strong> subsequently<br />
further processed at modern flavor facilities. The methods <strong>of</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> essential oils<br />
are reviewed in Chapter 4.<br />
7.3.2 PROCESSING OF ESSENTIAL OILS FOR FLAVOR FUNCTIONS<br />
Because essential oils are a product <strong>of</strong> nature, environmental <strong>and</strong> genetic factors will impact the<br />
chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the plant. Factors such as species <strong>and</strong> subspecies, geographical location,<br />
harvest time, plant part used, <strong>and</strong> method <strong>of</strong> isolation all affect the chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the<br />
crude material separated from the plant. The variability <strong>of</strong> the composition <strong>of</strong> the crude essential oil<br />
as isolated from nature has been the subject <strong>of</strong> much research <strong>and</strong> development since plant <strong>and</strong> oil<br />
yields are major economic factors in crop production.<br />
However, the crude essential oil that arrives at the flavor processing plant is not normally used as<br />
such. The crude oil is <strong>of</strong>ten subjected to a number <strong>of</strong> processes that are intended to increase purity<br />
<strong>and</strong> to produce a product with the intended flavor characteristics. Some essential oils may be distilled<br />
<strong>and</strong> cooled to remove natural waxes <strong>and</strong> improve clarity, while others are distilled more than<br />
once (i.e., rectified) to remove undesirable fractions or to increase the relative content <strong>of</strong> certain<br />
chemical constituents. Some oils are dry or vacuum distilled. Normally, at some point during processing,<br />
the essential oil is evaluated for its technical function as a flavor. This evaluation typically<br />
involves analysis [normally by gas chromatography (GC) or liquid chromatography] <strong>of</strong> the composition<br />
<strong>of</strong> the essential oil for chemical constituents that are markers for the desired technical flavor<br />
effect. For an essential oil such as cardamom oil, levels <strong>of</strong> target constituents such as terpinyl acetate,<br />
1,8-cineole, <strong>and</strong> limonene are markers for technical viability as a flavoring substance. Based<br />
on this initial assessment, the crude essential oil may be blended with other sources <strong>of</strong> the same oil<br />
or chemical constituents isolated from the oil to reach target ranges for key constituent markers that<br />
reflect flavor function. The mixture may then be further rectified by distillation. Each step <strong>of</strong> the<br />
process is driven by flavor function. Therefore, the chemical composition <strong>of</strong> product to be marketed<br />
may be significantly different from that <strong>of</strong> the crude oil. Also, the chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the processed<br />
essential oil is more consistent than that <strong>of</strong> the crude batches <strong>of</strong> oil isolated from various<br />
plant harvests. The range <strong>of</strong> concentrations for individual constituents <strong>and</strong> for groups <strong>of</strong> structurally<br />
related constituents in an essential oil are dictated, in large part, by the requirement that target levels<br />
<strong>of</strong> flavor-marker constituents must be maintained.<br />
7.3.3 CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND CONGENERIC GROUPS<br />
In addition to the key chemical markers for the technical flavor effect, an essential oil found on the<br />
market will normally contain many other chemical constituents, some having little or no flavor<br />
function. However, the chemical constituents <strong>of</strong> essential oils are not infinite in structural variation.<br />
Because they are derived from higher plants, these constituents are formed via one <strong>of</strong> four or<br />
five major biosynthetic pathways: lipoxygenase oxidation <strong>of</strong> lipids, shikimic acid, isoprenoid (terpenoid),<br />
<strong>and</strong> photosynthetic pathways. In ripening vegetables, lipoxygenases oxidize polyunsaturated<br />
fatty acids, eventually yielding low-molecular-weight aldehydes (2-hexenal), alcohols<br />
(2,6-nonadienol), <strong>and</strong> esters, many exhibiting flavoring properties. Plant amino acids phenylalanine<br />
<strong>and</strong> tyrosine are formed via the shikimic acid pathway <strong>and</strong> can subsequently be deaminated,
Safety Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 189<br />
oxidized, <strong>and</strong> reduced to yield important aromatic substances such as cinnamaldehyde <strong>and</strong><br />
eugenol. The vast majority <strong>of</strong> constituents detected in commercially viable essential oils are terpenes<br />
[e.g., hydrocarbons (limonene), alcohols (menthol), aldehydes (citral), ketones (carvone),<br />
acids, <strong>and</strong> esters (geranyl acetate)] that are formed via the isoprene pathway (Roe <strong>and</strong> Field, 1965).<br />
Since all <strong>of</strong> these pathways operate in plants, albeit to different extents depending on the species,<br />
season, <strong>and</strong> growth environment, many <strong>of</strong> the same chemical constituents are present in a wide<br />
variety <strong>of</strong> essential oils.<br />
A consequence <strong>of</strong> having a limited number <strong>of</strong> plant biosynthetic pathways is that structural variation<br />
<strong>of</strong> chemical constituents in an essential oil is limited. <strong>Essential</strong> oils typically contain 5–10<br />
distinct chemical classes or congeneric groups. Some congeneric groups, such as aliphatic terpene<br />
hydrocarbons, contain upwards <strong>of</strong> 100 chemically identified constituents. In some essential oils, a<br />
single constituent (e.g., citral in lemongrass oil) or congeneric group <strong>of</strong> constituents (e.g., hydroxyallylbenzene<br />
derivatives; eugenol, eugenyl acetate, etc., in clove bud oil) comprise the majority <strong>of</strong> the<br />
mass <strong>of</strong> the essential oil. In others, no single congeneric group predominates. For instance, although<br />
eight congeneric groups comprise >98% <strong>of</strong> the composition <strong>of</strong> oil <strong>of</strong> mentha piperita (peppermint<br />
oil), >95% <strong>of</strong> the oil is accounted for by three chemical groups—(1) terpene aliphatic <strong>and</strong> aromatic<br />
hydrocarbons, (2) terpene alicyclic secondary alcohols, ketones, <strong>and</strong> related esters, <strong>and</strong> (3) terpene<br />
2-isopropylidene substituted cyclohexanone derivatives <strong>and</strong> related substances.<br />
The formation <strong>and</strong> members <strong>of</strong> a congeneric group are chosen based on a combination <strong>of</strong> structural<br />
features <strong>and</strong> known biochemical fate. Substances with a common carbon-skeletal structure<br />
<strong>and</strong> functional groups that participate in common pathways <strong>of</strong> metabolism are assigned to the same<br />
congeneric group. For instance, menthyl acetate hydrolyzes prior to absorption yield menthol, which<br />
is absorbed <strong>and</strong> is inconvertible with menthone in fluid compartments (e.g., the blood). Menthol is<br />
either conjugated with glucuronic acid <strong>and</strong> excreted in the urine or undergoes further hydroxylation<br />
mainly at C8 to yield a diol that is also excreted, either free or conjugated. Despite the fact that<br />
menthyl acetate is an ester, menthol is an alcohol, menthone a ketone, <strong>and</strong> 3,8-menthanediol a diol;<br />
they are structurally <strong>and</strong> metabolically related (Figure 7.1). Therefore are members <strong>of</strong> the same<br />
congeneric group.<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> Mentha piperita, the three principal congeneric groups listed above have different<br />
metabolic options <strong>and</strong> possess different organ-specific toxic potential. The congeneric group <strong>of</strong><br />
terpene aliphatic <strong>and</strong> aromatic hydrocarbons is represented mainly by limonene <strong>and</strong> myrcene. The<br />
second <strong>and</strong> most predominant congeneric group is the alicyclic secondary alcohols, ketones, <strong>and</strong><br />
related esters that include d-menthol, menthone, isomenthone, <strong>and</strong> menthyl acetate. Although the<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
Menthyl<br />
acetate<br />
Menthol<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
p-Menthane-3,8-diol<br />
Menthone<br />
FIGURE 7.1 Congeneric groups are formed by members sharing common structural <strong>and</strong> metabolic features,<br />
such as the group <strong>of</strong> 2-isopropylidene substituted cyclohexanone derivatives <strong>and</strong> related substances.
190 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
third congeneric group contains alicyclic ketones similar in structure to menthone, it is metabolically<br />
quite different in that it contains an exocyclic isopropylidene substituent that undergoes hydroxylation<br />
principally at the C9 position, followed by ring closure <strong>and</strong> dehydration to yield a heteroaromatic<br />
furan ring <strong>of</strong> increased toxic potential. In the absence <strong>of</strong> a C4–C8 double bond, neither<br />
menthone nor isomenthone can participate in this intoxication pathway. Hence they are assigned to<br />
a different congeneric group.<br />
The presence <strong>of</strong> a limited number <strong>of</strong> congeneric groups in an essential oil is critical to the<br />
organization <strong>of</strong> constituents <strong>and</strong> subsequent safety evaluation <strong>of</strong> the oil itself. Members <strong>of</strong> each<br />
congeneric group exhibit common structural features <strong>and</strong> participate in common pathways <strong>of</strong> pharmacokinetics<br />
<strong>and</strong> metabolism <strong>and</strong> exhibit similar toxicologic potential. If the mass <strong>of</strong> the essential<br />
oil (>95%) can be adequately characterized chemically <strong>and</strong> constituents assigned to well-defined<br />
congeneric groups, the safety evaluation <strong>of</strong> the essential oil can be reduced to (1) a safety evaluation<br />
<strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the congeneric groups comprising the essential oil; <strong>and</strong> (2) a “sum <strong>of</strong> the parts” evaluation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the all congeneric groups to account for any chemical or biological interactions between congeneric<br />
groups in the essential oil under conditions <strong>of</strong> intended use. Validation <strong>of</strong> such an approach<br />
lies in the stepwise comparison <strong>of</strong> the dose <strong>and</strong> toxic effects for each key congeneric group with<br />
similar equivalent doses <strong>and</strong> toxic effects exhibited by the entire essential oil.<br />
Potential interactions between congeneric groups can, to some extent, be analyzed by an in-depth<br />
comparison <strong>of</strong> the biochemical <strong>and</strong> toxicologic properties <strong>of</strong> different congeneric groups in the<br />
essential oil. For some representative essential oils that have been the subject <strong>of</strong> toxicology studies,<br />
a comparison <strong>of</strong> data for the congeneric groups in the essential oil with data on the essential oil itself<br />
(congeneric groups together) is a basis for analyzing the presence or absence <strong>of</strong> interactions.<br />
Therefore, the impact <strong>of</strong> interaction between congeneric groups is minimal if the levels <strong>of</strong> <strong>and</strong> endpoints<br />
for toxicity <strong>of</strong> congeneric groups (e.g., tertiary terpene alcohols) are similar to those <strong>of</strong> the<br />
essential oil (e.g., cori<strong>and</strong>er oil).<br />
Since composition plays such a critical role in the evaluation, analytical identification requirements<br />
are also critical to the evaluation. Complete chemical characterization <strong>of</strong> the essential oil may<br />
be difficult or economically unfeasible based on the small volume <strong>of</strong> essential oil used as a flavor<br />
ingredient. In these few cases, mainly for low-volume essential oils, the unknown fraction may be<br />
appreciable <strong>and</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong> chemical constituents will not be identified. However, if the<br />
intake <strong>of</strong> the essential oil is low or significantly less than its intake from consumption <strong>of</strong> food<br />
(e.g., thyme) from which the essential oil is derived (e.g., thyme oil), there should be no significant<br />
concern for safety under conditions <strong>of</strong> intended use. For those cases in which chemical characterization<br />
<strong>of</strong> the essential oil is limited but the volume <strong>of</strong> intake is more significant, it may be necessary<br />
to perform additional analytical work to decrease the number <strong>of</strong> unidentified constituents or, in<br />
other cases, to perform selected toxicity studies on the essential oil itself. A principal goal <strong>of</strong> the<br />
safety evaluation <strong>of</strong> essential oils is that no congeneric groups that have significant human intakes<br />
should go unevaluated.<br />
7.3.4 CHEMICAL ASSAY REQUIREMENTS AND CHEMICAL DESCRIPTION OF ESSENTIAL OIL<br />
The safety evaluation <strong>of</strong> an essential oil involves specifying the biological origin, physical <strong>and</strong><br />
chemical properties, <strong>and</strong> any other relevant identifying characteristics. An essential oil produced<br />
under good manufacturing practices (GMP) should be <strong>of</strong> an appropriate purity (quality), <strong>and</strong> chemical<br />
characterization should be complete enough to guarantee a sufficient basis for a thorough safety<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> the essential oil under conditions <strong>of</strong> intended use. Because the evaluation is based<br />
primarily on the actual chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the essential oil, full specifications used in a safety<br />
evaluation will necessarily include not only information on the origin <strong>of</strong> the essential oil (commercial<br />
botanical sources, geographical sources, plant parts used, degree <strong>of</strong> maturity, <strong>and</strong> methods <strong>of</strong><br />
isolation) <strong>and</strong> physical properties (specific gravity, refractive index, optical rotation, solubility, etc.),<br />
but also chemical assays for a range <strong>of</strong> essential oils currently in commerce.
Safety Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 191<br />
7.3.4.1 Intake <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Essential</strong> Oil<br />
Based on current analytical methodology, it is possible to identify literally hundreds <strong>of</strong> constituents<br />
in an essential oil <strong>and</strong> quantify the constituents to part per million levels. But is this necessary<br />
or desirable ? From a practical point <strong>of</strong> view, the level <strong>of</strong> analysis for constituents should be directly<br />
related to the level <strong>of</strong> exposure to the essential oil. The requirements to identify <strong>and</strong> quantify constituents<br />
for use <strong>of</strong> 2,000,000 kg <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil annually should be far greater than that for use<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2000 kg <strong>of</strong> cori<strong>and</strong>er oil or 50 kg <strong>of</strong> myrrh oil annually. Also, there is a level at which exposure<br />
to each constituent is so low that there is no significant risk associated with intake <strong>of</strong> that substance.<br />
A conservative no-significant-risk-level <strong>of</strong> 1.5 mg/d (0.0015 mg/d or 0.000025 mg/kg/d)<br />
has been adopted by regulatory authorities as a level at which the human cancer risk is below<br />
one in one million (FDA, 2005). Therefore, if consumption <strong>of</strong> an essential oil results in an intake<br />
<strong>of</strong> a constituent that is
192 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
7.3.4.2 Analytical Limits on Constituent Identification<br />
As described above, the analytical requirements for detection <strong>and</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> the constituents<br />
<strong>of</strong> an essential oil are set by the intake <strong>of</strong> the oil <strong>and</strong> by the conservative assumption that<br />
constituents with intakes 0.15% would need to<br />
be chemically characterized <strong>and</strong> quantified:<br />
1.5 mg/d<br />
¥ 100 = 0.15 %.<br />
978 mg/d<br />
For the vast majority <strong>of</strong> essential oils, meeting these characterization requirements does not<br />
require exotic analytical techniques <strong>and</strong> the identification <strong>of</strong> the constituents is <strong>of</strong> a routine nature.<br />
However, what would the requirements be for very high-volume essential oils, such as orange oil,<br />
cold-pressed oil (567,000 kg), or peppermint oil (1,229,000 kg)? In these cases, a practical limit<br />
must be applied <strong>and</strong> can be justified based on the concept that the intake <strong>of</strong> these oils is widespread<br />
<strong>and</strong> far exceeds the 10% assumption <strong>of</strong> PCI ¥ 10. Based on current analytical capabilities, 0.10% or<br />
0.05% could be used as a reasonable limit <strong>of</strong> detection, with the lower level used for an essential oil<br />
that is known or suspected to contain constituents <strong>of</strong> higher toxic potential (e.g., methyl eugenol<br />
in basil).<br />
7.3.4.3 Intake <strong>of</strong> Congeneric Groups<br />
Once the analytical limits for identification <strong>of</strong> constituents have been met, it is key to evaluate the<br />
intake <strong>of</strong> each congeneric group from consumption <strong>of</strong> the essential oil. A range <strong>of</strong> concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
each congeneric group is determined from multiple analyses <strong>of</strong> different lots <strong>of</strong> the essential oil used<br />
in flavorings. The intake <strong>of</strong> each congeneric group is determined from mean concentrations (%) <strong>of</strong><br />
constituents recorded for each congeneric group. For instance, for peppermint oil the alicyclic secondary<br />
alcohol/ketone/related ester group may contain (−)-menthol, (−)-menthone, (−)-menthyl acetate,<br />
<strong>and</strong> isomenthone in mean concentrations <strong>of</strong> 43.0%, 20.3%, 4.4%, <strong>and</strong> 0.40%, respectively, with<br />
that congeneric group accounting for 68.1% <strong>of</strong> the oil. It should be emphasized that although members<br />
in a congeneric group may vary among the different lots <strong>of</strong> oil, the variation in concentration<br />
<strong>of</strong> congeneric groups in the oil is relatively small.<br />
Routinely, the daily PCI <strong>of</strong> the essential oil derived from the annual volumes is reported in industry<br />
surveys (NAS, 1965, 1970, 1975, 1982, 1987; Lucas et al., 1999, 2005; EFFA, 2005; JFFMA,<br />
2002). If a conservative estimate <strong>of</strong> intake <strong>of</strong> the essential oil is made using a volume- based approach<br />
such that a defined group <strong>of</strong> constituents <strong>and</strong> congeneric groups are set for each essential oil, target<br />
constituents can be monitored in an ongoing quality control program <strong>and</strong> the composition <strong>of</strong> the<br />
essential oil can become one <strong>of</strong> the key specifications linking the product that is distributed in the<br />
marketplace to the chemically based safety evaluation.<br />
Limited specifications for the chemical composition <strong>of</strong> some essential oils to be used as food<br />
flavorings are currently listed in the Food Chemicals Codex (FCC, 2008). For instance, the chemical<br />
assay for cinnamon oil is given as “not less than 80%, by volume, as total aldehydes.” Any<br />
specification developed related to this safety evaluation procedure should be consistent with<br />
already published specifications including FCC <strong>and</strong> ISO st<strong>and</strong>ards. However, based on chemical
Safety Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 193<br />
analyses for the commercially available oil, the chemical specification or assay can <strong>and</strong> should be<br />
exp<strong>and</strong>ed to<br />
1. Specify the mean <strong>of</strong> concentrations for congeneric groups with confidence limits that constitute<br />
a sufficient number <strong>of</strong> commercial lots constituting the vast majority <strong>of</strong> the oil.<br />
2. Identify key constituents <strong>of</strong> intake >1.5 μg/d in these groups that can be used to efficiently<br />
monitor the quality <strong>of</strong> the oil placed into commerce over time.<br />
3. Provide information on trace constituents that may be <strong>of</strong> a safety concern.<br />
For example, given its most recent reported annual volume (649 kg), it is anticipated that a chemical<br />
specification for lemongrass oil would include (1) >97.6% <strong>of</strong> the composition chemically identified;<br />
(2) not more than 92% aliphatic terpene primary alcohols, aldehydes, acids, <strong>and</strong> related esters,<br />
typically measured as citral; <strong>and</strong> (3) not more than 15% aliphatic terpene hydrocarbons, typically<br />
measured as myrcene. The principal goal <strong>of</strong> a chemical specification is to provide sufficient chemical<br />
characterization to ensure safety <strong>of</strong> the essential oil from use as a flavoring. From an industry<br />
st<strong>and</strong>point, the specification should be sufficiently descriptive as to allow timely quality control<br />
monitoring for constituents that are responsible for the technical flavor function. These constituents<br />
should also be representative <strong>of</strong> the major congeneric group or groups in the essential oil. Also,<br />
monitored constituents should include those that may be <strong>of</strong> a safety concern at sufficiently high<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> intake <strong>of</strong> the essential oil (e.g., pulegone). The scope <strong>of</strong> a specification should be sufficient<br />
to ensure safety in use, but not impose an unnecessary burden on industry to perform ongoing<br />
analyses for constituents unrelated to the safety or flavor <strong>of</strong> the essential oil.<br />
7.4 SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS FOR ESSENTIAL OILS, CONSTITUENTS,<br />
AND CONGENERIC GROUPS<br />
7.4.1 ESSENTIAL OILS<br />
7.4.1.1 Safety <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>: Relationship to Food<br />
The close relationship <strong>of</strong> natural flavor complexes to food itself has made it difficult to evaluate the<br />
safety <strong>and</strong> regulate the use <strong>of</strong> essential oils. In the United States, the Federal Food Drug <strong>and</strong> Cosmetic<br />
Act (FFDCA) recognizes that a different, lower st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>of</strong> safety must apply to naturally occurring<br />
substances in food than applies to the same ingredient intentionally added to food. For a substance<br />
occurring naturally in food, the Act applies a realistic st<strong>and</strong>ard that the substance must “… not ordinarily<br />
render it [the food] injurious to health” (21 CFR 172.30). For added substances, a much higher st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
applies. The food is considered to be adulterated if the added substance “… may render it [the food]<br />
injurious to health” (21 CFR 172.20). <strong>Essential</strong> oils used as flavoring substances occupy an intermediate<br />
position in that they are composed <strong>of</strong> naturally occurring substances, many <strong>of</strong> which are intentionally<br />
added to food as individual chemical substances. Because they are considered neither a direct food additive<br />
nor a food itself, no current st<strong>and</strong>ard can be easily applied to the safety evaluation <strong>of</strong> essential oils.<br />
The evaluation <strong>of</strong> the safety <strong>of</strong> essential oils that have a documented history <strong>of</strong> use in foods starts<br />
with the presumption that they are safe based on their long history <strong>of</strong> use over a wide range <strong>of</strong> human<br />
exposures without known adverse effects. With a high degree <strong>of</strong> confidence one may presume that<br />
essential oils derived from food are likely to be safe. Annual surveys <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> flavoring substances<br />
in the United States (Lucas et al., 1999, 2005; NAS, 1965, 1970, 1975, 1981, 1987; 21 CFR<br />
172.510) in part, document the history <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> many essential oils. Conversely, confidence in the<br />
presumption <strong>of</strong> safety decreases for natural complexes that exhibit a significant change in the pattern<br />
<strong>of</strong> use or when novel natural complexes with unique flavor properties enter the food supply. Recent<br />
consumer trends that have changed the typical consumer diet have also changed the exposure levels<br />
to essential oils in a variety <strong>of</strong> ways. As one example, changes in the use <strong>of</strong> cinnamon oil in low-fat<br />
cinnamon pastries would alter intake for a specialized population <strong>of</strong> eaters. Secondly, increased
194 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
international trade has coupled with a reduction in cultural cuisine barriers, leading to the introduction<br />
<strong>of</strong> novel plants <strong>and</strong> plant extracts from previously remote geographical locations. Osmanthus absolute<br />
(FEMA No. 3750) <strong>and</strong> Jambu oleoresin (FEMA No. 3783) are examples <strong>of</strong> natural complexes<br />
recently used as flavoring substances that are derived from plants not indigenous to the United States<br />
<strong>and</strong> not commonly consumed as part <strong>of</strong> a Western diet. Furthermore, the consumption <strong>of</strong> some essential<br />
oils may not occur solely from intake as flavoring substances; rather, they may be regularly consumed<br />
as dietary supplements with advertised functional benefits. These impacts have brought<br />
renewed interest in the safety evaluation <strong>of</strong> essential oils. Although the safety evaluation <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oil must still rely heavily on knowledge <strong>of</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> use, a flexible science-based approach would<br />
allow for rigorous safety evaluation <strong>of</strong> different uses for the same essential oil.<br />
7.4.2 SAFETY OF CONSTITUENTS AND CONGENERIC GROUPS IN ESSENTIAL OILS<br />
Of the many naturally occurring constituents so far identified in plants, there are none that pose, or<br />
reasonably might be expected to pose a significant risk to human health at current low levels <strong>of</strong><br />
intake when used as flavoring substances. When consumed in higher quantities, normally for other<br />
functions, some plants do indeed exhibit toxicity. Historically, humans have used plants as poisons<br />
(e.g., hemlock) <strong>and</strong> many <strong>of</strong> the intended medicinal uses <strong>of</strong> plants (pennyroyal oil as an abortifacient)<br />
have produced undesirable toxic side effects. High levels <strong>of</strong> exposure to selected constituents<br />
in the plant or essential oil (i.e., pulegone in pennyroyal oil) have been associated with the observed<br />
toxicity. However, with regard to flavor use, experience through long-term use <strong>and</strong> the predominant<br />
self-limiting impact <strong>of</strong> flavorings on our senses have restricted the amount <strong>of</strong> a plant or plant part<br />
that we use in or on food.<br />
Extensive scientific data on the most commonly occurring major constituents in essential oils have<br />
not revealed any results that would give rise to safety concerns at low levels <strong>of</strong> exposure. Chronic<br />
studies have been performed on more 30 major chemical constituents (menthol, carvone, limonene,<br />
citral, cinnamaldehyde, benzaldehyde, benzyl acetate, 2-ethyl-1-hexanol, methyl anthranilate, geranyl<br />
acetate, furfural, eugneol, isoeugenol, etc.) found in many essential oils. The majority <strong>of</strong> these<br />
studies were hazard determinations that were sponsored by the National Toxicology Program (NTP)<br />
<strong>and</strong> they were normally performed at dose levels many orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude greater than the daily<br />
intakes <strong>of</strong> these constituents from consumption <strong>of</strong> the essential oil. Even at these high intake levels,<br />
the majority <strong>of</strong> the constituents show no carcinogenic potential (Smith et al., 2005a). In addition to<br />
dose/exposure, for some flavor ingredients the carcinogenic potential that was assessed in the study<br />
is related to several additional factors including the mode <strong>of</strong> administration, species <strong>and</strong> sex <strong>of</strong> the<br />
animal model, <strong>and</strong> target organ specificity. In the vast majority <strong>of</strong> studies, the carcinogenic effect<br />
occurs through a nongenotoxic mechanism in which tumors form secondary to preexisting highdose,<br />
chronic organ toxicity, typically to the liver or kidneys. Selected subgroups <strong>of</strong> structurally<br />
related substances (e.g., aldehydes <strong>and</strong> terpene hydrocarbons) are associated with a single-target<br />
organ <strong>and</strong> tumor type in a specific species <strong>and</strong> sex <strong>of</strong> rodent (i.e., male rat kidney tumors secondary<br />
to a-2u-globulin neoplasms with limonene in male rats) or using a single mode <strong>of</strong> administration (i.e.,<br />
forestomach tumors that arise due to high doses <strong>of</strong> benzaldehyde <strong>and</strong> hexadienal given by gavage).<br />
Given their long history <strong>of</strong> use, it is unlikely that there are essential oils consumed by humans that<br />
contain constituents not yet studied that are weak nongenotoxic carcinogens at chronic high-dose levels.<br />
Even if there are such cases, because <strong>of</strong> the relatively low intake (Adams et al., 2005) as constituents <strong>of</strong><br />
essential oils, these yet-to-be-discovered constituents would be many orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude less potent<br />
than similar levels <strong>of</strong> aflatoxins (found in peanut butter), the polycyclic heterocyclic amines (found in<br />
cooked foods), or the polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (also found in cooked foods). There is nothing<br />
to suggest that the major biosynthetic pathways available to higher plants are capable <strong>of</strong> producing substances<br />
such that low levels <strong>of</strong> exposure to the substance would result in a high level <strong>of</strong> toxicity or carcinogenicity.<br />
Thus, while the minor constituents should be considered, particularly in those plant<br />
families <strong>and</strong> genera known to contain constituents <strong>of</strong> concern, there is less need for caution than when<br />
dealing with xenobiotics, or with substances from origins other than those considered here.
Safety Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 195<br />
The toxic <strong>and</strong> carcinogenic potentials exhibited by constituent chemicals in essential oils can<br />
largely be equated with the toxic potential <strong>of</strong> the congeneric group to which that chemical belongs. A<br />
comparison <strong>of</strong> the oral toxicity data (JECFA, 2004) for limonene, myrcene, pinene, <strong>and</strong> other members<br />
<strong>of</strong> the congeneric group <strong>of</strong> terpene hydrocarbons show similar low levels <strong>of</strong> toxicity with the same<br />
high-dose target organ endpoint (kidney). Likewise, dietary toxicity <strong>and</strong> carcinogenicity data (JECFA,<br />
2001) for cinnamyl alcohol, cinnamaldehyde, cinnamyl acetate, <strong>and</strong> other members <strong>of</strong> the congeneric<br />
group <strong>of</strong> 3-phenyl-1-propanol derivatives show similar toxic <strong>and</strong> carcinogenic endpoints. The safety<br />
data for the congeneric chemical groups that are found in vast majority <strong>of</strong> essential oils have been<br />
reviewed (Adams et al., 1996, 1997, 1998, 2004; Newberne et al., 1999; Smith et al., 2002a, 2002b;<br />
JECFA, 1997–2004). Available data for different representative members in each <strong>of</strong> these congeneric<br />
groups support the conclusion that the toxic <strong>and</strong> carcinogenic potential <strong>of</strong> individual constituents<br />
adequately represent similar potentials for the corresponding congeneric group.<br />
The second key factor in the determination <strong>of</strong> safety is the level <strong>of</strong> intake <strong>of</strong> the congeneric group<br />
from consumption <strong>of</strong> the essential oil. Intake <strong>of</strong> the congeneric group will, in turn, depend on the<br />
variability <strong>of</strong> the chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the essential oil in the marketplace <strong>and</strong> on the conditions<br />
<strong>of</strong> use. As discussed earlier, chemical analysis <strong>of</strong> the different batches <strong>of</strong> oil obtained from the same<br />
<strong>and</strong> different manufacturers will produce a range <strong>of</strong> concentrations for individual constituents in<br />
each congeneric group <strong>of</strong> the essential oil. The mean concentration values (%) for constituents are<br />
then summed for all members <strong>of</strong> the congeneric group. The total % determined for the congeneric<br />
group is multiplied by the estimated daily intake (PCI ¥ 10) <strong>of</strong> the essential oil to provide a conservative<br />
estimate <strong>of</strong> exposure to each congeneric group from consumption <strong>of</strong> the essential oil.<br />
In some essential oils, the intake <strong>of</strong> one constituent, <strong>and</strong> therefore, one congeneric group, may<br />
account for essentially all <strong>of</strong> the oil (e.g., linalool in cori<strong>and</strong>er oil, citral in lemongrass oil, <strong>and</strong> benzaldehyde<br />
in bitter almond oil). In other oils, exposure to a variety <strong>of</strong> congeneric groups over a broad<br />
concentration range may occur. As noted earlier, cardamom oil is an example <strong>of</strong> such an essential<br />
oil. Ultimately, it is the relative intake <strong>and</strong> the toxic potential <strong>of</strong> each congeneric group that is the<br />
basis <strong>of</strong> the congeneric group-based safety evaluation. The combination <strong>of</strong> relative intake <strong>and</strong> toxic<br />
potential will prioritize congeneric groups for the safety evaluation. Hypothetically, a congeneric<br />
group <strong>of</strong> increased toxic potential that accounts for only 5% <strong>of</strong> the essential oil may be prioritized<br />
higher than a congeneric group <strong>of</strong> lower toxic potential accounting for 95%.<br />
The following guide <strong>and</strong> examples therein are intended to more fully illustrate the principles<br />
described above that are involved in the safety evaluation <strong>of</strong> essential oils. Fermentation products,<br />
process flavors, substances derived from fungi, microorganisms, or animals; <strong>and</strong> direct food additives<br />
are explicitly excluded. The guide is designed specifically for application to approximately 100<br />
essential oils that are currently in use as flavoring substances, <strong>and</strong> for any new essential oils that are<br />
anticipated to be marketed as flavoring substances. The guide is a tool to organize <strong>and</strong> prioritize the<br />
chemical constituents <strong>and</strong> congeneric groups in an essential oil in such a way as to allow a detailed<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> their chemical <strong>and</strong> biological properties. This analysis as well as consideration <strong>of</strong> other<br />
relevant scientific data provides the basis for a safety evaluation <strong>of</strong> the essential oil under conditions<br />
<strong>of</strong> intended use. Validation <strong>of</strong> the approach is provided, in large part, by a detailed comparison <strong>of</strong><br />
the doses <strong>and</strong> toxic effects exhibited by constituents <strong>of</strong> the congeneric group with the equivalent<br />
doses <strong>and</strong> effects provided by the essential oil.<br />
7.5 THE GUIDE AND EXAMPLE FOR THE SAFETY EVALUATION<br />
OF ESSENTIAL OILS<br />
7.5.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
The guide does not employ criteria commonly used for the safety evaluation <strong>of</strong> individual chemical<br />
substances. Instead, it is a procedure involving a comprehensive evaluation <strong>of</strong> the chemical <strong>and</strong><br />
biological properties <strong>of</strong> the constituents <strong>and</strong> congeneric groups <strong>of</strong> an essential oil. Constituents<br />
in the oil that are <strong>of</strong> known structure are organized into congeneric groups that exhibit similar
196 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
metabolic <strong>and</strong> toxicologic properties. The congeneric groups are further classified according to levels<br />
(Structural Classes I, II, <strong>and</strong> III) <strong>of</strong> toxicologic concern using a decision-tree approach (Cramer et al.,<br />
1978; Munro et al., 1996). Based on intake data for the essential oil <strong>and</strong> constituent concentrations,<br />
the congeneric groups are prioritized according to intake <strong>and</strong> toxicity potential. The procedure<br />
ultimately focuses on those congeneric groups that due to their structural features <strong>and</strong> intake may<br />
pose some significant risk from the consumption <strong>of</strong> the essential oil. Key elements used to evaluate<br />
congeneric groups include exposure, structural analogy, metabolism, <strong>and</strong> toxicology, which include<br />
toxicity, carcinogenicity, <strong>and</strong> genotoxic potential (Adams et al., 1996, 1997, 1998, 2004; Woods <strong>and</strong><br />
Doull, 1991; Oser <strong>and</strong> Ford, 1991; Oser <strong>and</strong> Hall, 1977; Newberne et al., 1999; Smith et al., 2002a,<br />
2002b). Throughout the analysis <strong>of</strong> these data, it is essential that pr<strong>of</strong>essional judgment <strong>and</strong> expertise<br />
be applied to complete the safety evaluation <strong>of</strong> the essential oil. As an example <strong>of</strong> how a typical<br />
evaluation process for an essential oil is carried out according to this guide, the safety evaluation for<br />
flavor use <strong>of</strong> cornmint oil (Mentha arvensis) is outlined in Section 7.5.3.2.1.<br />
7.5.2 ELEMENTS OF THE GUIDE FOR THE SAFETY EVALUATION OF THE ESSENTIAL OIL<br />
7.5.2.1 Introduction<br />
In Step 1 <strong>of</strong> the guide, the evaluation procedure estimates intake based on industry survey data for each<br />
essential oil. It then organizes the chemically identified constituents that have an intake >1.5 μg/d into<br />
congeneric groups that participate in common pathways <strong>of</strong> metabolism <strong>and</strong> exhibit similar toxic potential.<br />
In Steps 2 <strong>and</strong> 3, each identified chemical constituent is broadly classified according to toxic<br />
potential (Cramer et al., 1978) <strong>and</strong> then assigned to a congeneric group <strong>of</strong> structurally related substances<br />
that exhibit similar pathways <strong>of</strong> metabolism <strong>and</strong> toxicologic potential.<br />
Before the formal evaluation begins, it is necessary to specify the data (e.g., botanical, physical,<br />
<strong>and</strong> chemical) required to completely describe the product being evaluated. In order to effectively<br />
evaluate an essential oil, attempted complete analyses must be available for the product intended for<br />
the marketplace from a number <strong>of</strong> flavor manufacturers. Additional quality control data are useful,<br />
as they demonstrate consistency in the chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the product being marketed. A<br />
Technical Information paper drafted for the particular essential oil under consideration organizes<br />
<strong>and</strong> prioritizes these data for efficient sequential evaluation <strong>of</strong> the essential oil.<br />
In Steps 8 <strong>and</strong> 9, the safety <strong>of</strong> the essential oil is evaluated in the context <strong>of</strong> all congeneric groups<br />
<strong>and</strong> any other related data (e.g., data on the essential oil itself or for an essential oil <strong>of</strong> similar composition).<br />
The procedure organizes the extensive database <strong>of</strong> information on the essential oil constituents<br />
in order to efficiently evaluate the safety <strong>of</strong> the essential oil under conditions <strong>of</strong> use. It is<br />
important to stress, however, that the guide is not intended to be nor in practice operates as a rigid<br />
checklist. Each essential oil that undergoes evaluation is different, <strong>and</strong> different data will be available<br />
for each. The overriding objective <strong>of</strong> the guide <strong>and</strong> subsequent evaluation is to ensure that no<br />
significant portion <strong>of</strong> the essential oil should go unevaluated.<br />
7.5.2.2 Prioritization <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil According to Presence in Food<br />
In Step 1, essential oils are prioritized according to their presence or absence as components <strong>of</strong><br />
commonly consumed foods. Many essential oils are isolated from plants that are commonly consumed<br />
as a food. Little or no safety concerns should exist for the intentional addition <strong>of</strong> the essential<br />
oil to the diet, particularly if intake <strong>of</strong> the oil from consumption <strong>of</strong> traditional foods (garlic) substantially<br />
exceeds intake as an intentionally added flavoring substance (garlic oil). In many ways, the<br />
first step applies the concept <strong>of</strong> “long history <strong>of</strong> safe use” to essential oils. That is, if exposure to the<br />
essential oil occurs predominantly from consumption <strong>of</strong> a normal diet a conclusion <strong>of</strong> safety is<br />
straightforward. Step 1 <strong>of</strong> the guide clearly places essential oils that are consumed as part <strong>of</strong> a<br />
traditional diet on a lower level <strong>of</strong> concern than those oils derived from plants that are either not part<br />
<strong>of</strong> the traditional diet or whose intake is not predominantly from the diet. The first step also mitigates
Safety Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 197<br />
the need to perform comprehensive chemical analysis for essential oils in those cases where intake<br />
is low <strong>and</strong> occurs predominantly from consumption <strong>of</strong> food. An estimate <strong>of</strong> the intake <strong>of</strong> the essential<br />
oil is based on the most recent poundage available from flavor industry surveys <strong>and</strong> the assumption<br />
that the essential oil is consumed by only 10% <strong>of</strong> the population for an oil having a survey<br />
volume 50,000 kg/yr.<br />
In addition, the detection limit for constituents is determined based on the daily PCI <strong>of</strong> the<br />
essential oil.<br />
7.5.2.2.1 Cornmint Oil<br />
To illustrate the type <strong>of</strong> data considered in Step 1, consider cornmint oil. Cornmint oil is produced<br />
by the steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the flowering herb <strong>of</strong> Mentha arvensis. The crude oil contains upwards<br />
<strong>of</strong> 70% (−)-menthol, some <strong>of</strong> which is isolated by crystallization at low temperature. The resulting<br />
dementholized oil is cornmint oil. Although produced mainly in Brazil during the 1970s <strong>and</strong><br />
1980s, cornmint oil is now produced predominantly in China <strong>and</strong> India. Cornmint has a more<br />
stringent taste compared to that <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil, Mentha piperita, but can be efficiently produced<br />
<strong>and</strong> is used as a more cost-effective substitute. Cornmint oil isolated from various crops undergoes<br />
subsequent “clean up,” further distillation, <strong>and</strong> blending to produce the finished commercial oil.<br />
Although there may be significant variability in the concentrations <strong>of</strong> individual constituents in<br />
different samples <strong>of</strong> crude essential oil, there is far less variability in the concentration <strong>of</strong> constituents<br />
<strong>and</strong> congeneric groups in the finished commercial oil. The volume <strong>of</strong> cornmint oil reported<br />
in the most recent U.S. poundage survey is 327,494 kg/yr (Gavin et al., 2008), which is approximately<br />
25% <strong>of</strong> the potential market <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil. Because cornmint oil is a high- volume<br />
essential oil, it is highly likely that the entire population consumes the annual reported volume, <strong>and</strong><br />
therefore the daily PCI is calculated based on 100% <strong>of</strong> the population (280,000,000). This results<br />
in a daily PCI <strong>of</strong> approximately 3.2 mg/person/d (0.0533 mg/kg bw/d) <strong>of</strong> cornmint oil.<br />
9<br />
327,494 kg/yr ¥ 10 mg/kg<br />
6<br />
365 days/yr ¥ 280 ¥ 10 persons<br />
= 3204 mg/person/d.<br />
Based on the intake <strong>of</strong> cornmint oil (3204 μg/d), any constituent present at >0.047% would need to<br />
be chemically characterized <strong>and</strong> quantified:<br />
1.5 mg/d<br />
¥ 100 = 0.047 %.<br />
3204 mg/d<br />
7.5.2.3 Organization <strong>of</strong> Chemical Data: Congeneric Groups <strong>and</strong> Classes <strong>of</strong> Toxicity<br />
In Step 2, constituents are assigned to one <strong>of</strong> three structural classes (I, II, or III) based on toxic<br />
potential (Cramer et al., 1978). Class I substances contain structural features that suggest a low order<br />
<strong>of</strong> oral toxicity. Class II substances are clearly less innocuous than Class I substances, but do not<br />
contain structural features that provide a positive indication <strong>of</strong> toxicity. Class III substances contain<br />
structural features (e.g., an epoxide functional group, unsubstituted heteroaromatic derivatives) that<br />
permit no strong presumption <strong>of</strong> safety, <strong>and</strong> in some cases may even suggest significant toxicity. For<br />
instance, the simple aliphatic hydrocarbon, limonene, is assigned to Structural Class I while elemicin,<br />
which is an allyl-substituted benzene derivative with a reactive benzylic/allylic position, is<br />
assigned to Class III. Likewise, chemically unidentified constituents <strong>of</strong> the essential oil are automatically<br />
placed in Structural Class III, since no presumption <strong>of</strong> safety can be made.
198 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
The toxic potential <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the three structural classes has been quantified (Munro et al., 1996).<br />
An extensive toxicity database has been compiled for substances in each structural class. The database<br />
covers a wide range <strong>of</strong> chemical structures, including food additives, naturally occurring substances,<br />
pesticides, drugs, antioxidants, industrial chemicals, flavors, <strong>and</strong> fragrances. Conservative noobservable-effect-levels<br />
(fifth percentile NOELs) have been determined for each class. These fifth percentile<br />
NOELs for each structural class are converted to human exposure thresholds levels by applying<br />
a 100-fold safety factor <strong>and</strong> correcting for mean bodyweight (60/100). The human exposure threshold<br />
levels are referred to as thresholds <strong>of</strong> toxicological concern (TTC). With regard to flavoring substances,<br />
the TTC are even more conservative, given that the vast majority <strong>of</strong> NOELs for flavoring substances are<br />
above the 90th percentile. These conservative TTC have since been adopted by the WHO <strong>and</strong><br />
Commission <strong>of</strong> the European Communities for use in the evaluation <strong>of</strong> chemically identified flavoring<br />
agents by Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) <strong>and</strong> the European Food<br />
Safety Authority (EFSA) (JECFA, 1997; EC, 1999).<br />
Step 3 is a key step in the guide. It organizes the chemical constituents into congeneric groups<br />
that exhibit common chemical <strong>and</strong> biological properties. Based on the well-recognized biochemical<br />
pathways operating in plants, essentially all <strong>of</strong> the volatile constituents found in essential oils,<br />
extracts, <strong>and</strong> oleoresins belong to well-recognized congeneric groups. Recent reports (Maarse et al.,<br />
1992, 1994, 2000; Nijssen et al., 2003) <strong>of</strong> the identification <strong>of</strong> new naturally occurring constituents<br />
indicate that newly identified substances fall into existing congeneric groups. The Expert Panel,<br />
JECFA, <strong>and</strong> the European Communities (EC) have acknowledged that individual chemical substances<br />
can be evaluated in the context <strong>of</strong> their respective congeneric group (Smith et al., 2005;<br />
JECFA, 1997; EC, 1999). The congeneric group approach provides the basis for underst<strong>and</strong>ing the<br />
relationship between the biochemical fate <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> a chemical group <strong>and</strong> their toxicologic<br />
potential. Within this framework, the objective is to continuously build a more complete underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
<strong>of</strong> the absorption, distribution, metabolism, <strong>and</strong> excretion <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> the congeneric<br />
group <strong>and</strong> their potential to cause systemic toxicity. Within the guidelines, the structural class <strong>of</strong><br />
each congeneric group is assigned based on the highest structural class <strong>of</strong> any member <strong>of</strong> the group.<br />
Therefore, if an essential oil contained a group <strong>of</strong> furanone derivatives that were variously assigned<br />
to structural classes II <strong>and</strong> III, then in the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the oil the congeneric group would, in a<br />
conservative manner, be assigned to Class III.<br />
The types <strong>and</strong> numbers <strong>of</strong> congeneric groups in a safety evaluation program are, by no means,<br />
static. As new scientific data <strong>and</strong> information become available, some congeneric groups are combined<br />
while others are subdivided. This has been the case for the group <strong>of</strong> alicyclic secondary<br />
alcohols <strong>and</strong> ketones that were the subject <strong>of</strong> a comprehensive scientific literature review (SLR) in<br />
1975 (FEMA, 1975). Over the last two decades, experimental data have become available indicating<br />
that a few members <strong>of</strong> this group exhibit biochemical fate <strong>and</strong> toxicologic potential inconsistent<br />
with that for other members <strong>of</strong> the same group. These inconsistencies, almost without exception,<br />
arise at high-dose levels that are irrelevant to the safety evaluation <strong>of</strong> low levels <strong>of</strong> exposure to flavor<br />
use <strong>of</strong> the substance. However, given the importance <strong>of</strong> the congeneric group approach in the safety<br />
assessment program, it is critical to resolve these inconsistencies. Additional metabolic <strong>and</strong> toxicologic<br />
studies may be required to distinguish the factors that determine these differences. Often the<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> dose <strong>and</strong> a unique structural feature results in utilization <strong>of</strong> a metabolic activation pathway<br />
not utilized by other members <strong>of</strong> a congeneric group. Currently, evaluating bodies including JECFA,<br />
EFSA, <strong>and</strong> the FEMA Expert Panel have classified flavoring substances into the same congeneric<br />
groups for the purpose <strong>of</strong> safety evaluation.<br />
Step 4 incorporates the available analytical data for constituents in the essential oil into the congeneric<br />
group approach. First, the percentages <strong>of</strong> the individual constituents that comprise each<br />
congeneric group are summed. The highest determined percentages for each constituent are used to<br />
calculate a total amount for each congeneric group, since this provides the highest possible amount <strong>of</strong><br />
each congeneric group within the oil. Based on that high percentage <strong>and</strong> the estimated daily PCI <strong>of</strong> the<br />
essential oil, the daily PCI <strong>of</strong> the congeneric group from the essential oil is estimated.
Safety Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 199<br />
In Steps 5, 6, <strong>and</strong> 7, each congeneric group in the essential oil is evaluated for safety in use. In<br />
Step 5, an evaluation <strong>of</strong> the metabolism <strong>and</strong> disposition is performed to determine, under current<br />
conditions <strong>of</strong> intake, whether the group <strong>of</strong> congeneric constituents is metabolized by well- established<br />
detoxication pathways to yield innocuous products. That is, such pathways exist for the congeneric<br />
group <strong>of</strong> constituents in an essential oil <strong>and</strong> safety concerns will arise only if intake <strong>of</strong> the congeneric<br />
group is sufficient to saturate these pathways potentially leading to toxicity. If a significant<br />
intoxication pathway exists (e.g., pulegone), this should be reflected in a higher decision-tree class<br />
<strong>and</strong> lower TTC threshold. At Step 6 <strong>of</strong> the procedure, the intake <strong>of</strong> the congeneric group relative to<br />
the respective TTC for one <strong>of</strong> the three structural classes (1800 μg/d for Class I; 540 μg/d for Class<br />
II; 90 μg/d for Class III; see Table 7.1) is evaluated. If the intake <strong>of</strong> the congeneric group is less than<br />
the threshold for the respective structural class, the intake <strong>of</strong> the congeneric group presents no significant<br />
safety concerns. The group passes the first phase <strong>of</strong> the evaluation <strong>and</strong> is then referred to<br />
Step 8, the step in which the safety <strong>of</strong> the congeneric group is evaluated in the context <strong>of</strong> all congeneric<br />
groups in the essential oil.<br />
If, at Step 5, no sufficient metabolic data exist to establish safe excretion <strong>of</strong> the product, or if<br />
activation pathways have been identified for a particular congeneric group, then the group moves to<br />
Step 7 <strong>and</strong> toxicity data are required to establish safe use under current conditions <strong>of</strong> intake. There<br />
are examples where low levels <strong>of</strong> xenobiotic substances can be metabolized to reactive substances.<br />
In the event that reactive metabolites are formed at low levels <strong>of</strong> intake <strong>of</strong> naturally occurring substances,<br />
a detailed analysis <strong>of</strong> dose-dependent toxicity data must be performed. Also, if the intake<br />
<strong>of</strong> the congeneric group is greater than the human exposure threshold (suggesting metabolic saturation<br />
may occur), then toxicity data are also required. If, at Step 7, a database <strong>of</strong> relevant toxicological<br />
data for a representative member or members <strong>of</strong> the congeneric group indicates that a sufficient<br />
margin <strong>of</strong> safety exists for the intake <strong>of</strong> the congeneric group, the members <strong>of</strong> that congeneric group<br />
are concluded to be safe under conditions <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> the essential oil. The congeneric group then<br />
moves to Step 8.<br />
TABLE 7.1<br />
Structural Class Definitions <strong>and</strong> Their Human Intake Thresholds<br />
Class<br />
I<br />
II<br />
III<br />
Description<br />
Structure <strong>and</strong> related data suggest a low order <strong>of</strong> toxicity.<br />
If combined with low human exposure, they should enjoy<br />
an extremely low priority for investigation. The criteria<br />
for adequate evidence <strong>of</strong> safety would also be minimal.<br />
Greater exposures would require proportionately higher<br />
priority for more exhaustive study<br />
Intermediate substances. They are less clearly innocuous<br />
than those <strong>of</strong> Class I, but do not <strong>of</strong>fer the basis either <strong>of</strong><br />
the positive indication <strong>of</strong> toxicity or <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong><br />
knowledge characteristic <strong>of</strong> those in Class III<br />
Permit no strong initial presumptions <strong>of</strong> safety, or that<br />
may even suggest significant toxicity. They thus deserve<br />
the highest priority for investigation. Particularly, when<br />
per capita intake is high <strong>of</strong> a significant subsection <strong>of</strong> the<br />
population has a high intake, the implied hazard would<br />
then require the most extensive evidence for safety-in-use<br />
Fifth Percentile<br />
NOEL (mg/kg/d)<br />
Human Exposure<br />
Threshold (TTC) a (µg/d)<br />
3.0 1800<br />
0.91 540<br />
0.15 90<br />
a<br />
The human exposure threshold was calculated by multiplying the fifth percentile NOEL by 60 (assuming an individual<br />
weighs 60 kg) <strong>and</strong> dividing by a safety factor <strong>of</strong> 100.
200 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
In the event that insufficient data are available to evaluate a congeneric group at Step 7, or the<br />
currently available data result in margins <strong>of</strong> safety that are not sufficient, the essential oil cannot be<br />
further evaluated by this guide <strong>and</strong> must be set aside for further considerations.<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> the guide requires scientific judgment at each step <strong>of</strong> the sequence. For instance, if a congeneric<br />
group that accounted for 20% <strong>of</strong> a high-volume essential oil was previously evaluated <strong>and</strong><br />
found to be safe under intended conditions <strong>of</strong> use, the same congeneric group found at less than 2%<br />
<strong>of</strong> a low-volume essential oil does not need to be further evaluated.<br />
Step 8 considers additivity or synergistic interactions between individual substances <strong>and</strong> between<br />
the different congeneric groups in the essential oil. As for all other toxicological concerns, the level <strong>of</strong><br />
exposure to congeneric groups is relevant to whether additive or synergistic effects present a significant<br />
health hazard. The vast majority <strong>of</strong> essential oils are used in food in extremely low concentrations,<br />
which therefore results in very low intake levels <strong>of</strong> the different congeneric groups within that oil.<br />
Moreover, major representative constituents <strong>of</strong> each congeneric group have been tested individually<br />
<strong>and</strong> pose no toxicological threat even at dose levels that are orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude greater than normal<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> intake <strong>of</strong> essential oils from use in traditional foods. Based on the results <strong>of</strong> toxicity studies<br />
both on major constituents <strong>of</strong> different congeneric groups in the essential oil <strong>and</strong> on the essential oil<br />
itself, it can be concluded that the toxic potential <strong>of</strong> these major constituents is representative <strong>of</strong> that <strong>of</strong><br />
the oil itself, indicating the likely absence <strong>of</strong> additivity <strong>and</strong> synergistic interaction. In general, the margin<br />
<strong>of</strong> safety is so wide <strong>and</strong> the possibility <strong>of</strong> additivity or synergistic interaction so remote that combined<br />
exposure to the different congeneric groups <strong>and</strong> the unknowns are considered <strong>of</strong> no health<br />
concern, even if expert judgment cannot fully rule out additivity or synergism. However, case-by-case<br />
considerations are appropriate. Where possible combined effects might be considered to have toxicological<br />
relevance, additional data may be needed for an adequate safety evaluation <strong>of</strong> the essential oil.<br />
Additivity <strong>of</strong> toxicologic effect or synergistic interaction is a conservative default assumption<br />
that may be applied whenever the available metabolic data do not clearly suggest otherwise. The<br />
extensive database <strong>of</strong> metabolic information on congeneric groups (JECFA, 1997–2004) that are<br />
found in essential oils suggests that the potential for additive effects <strong>and</strong> synergistic interactions<br />
among congeneric groups in essential oils is extremely low. Although additivity <strong>of</strong> effect is the<br />
approach recommended by National Academy <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s (NAS)/National Research Council (NRC)<br />
committees (NRC, 1988, 1994) <strong>and</strong> regulatory agencies (EPA, 1988), the Presidential Commission<br />
<strong>of</strong> Risk Assessment <strong>and</strong> Risk Management recommended (Presidential Commission, 1996, p. 68)<br />
that “For risk assessments involving multiple chemical exposures at low concentrations, without<br />
information on mechanisms, risks should be added. If the chemicals act through separate mechanisms,<br />
their attendant risks should not be added but should be considered separately.” Thus, the<br />
risks <strong>of</strong> chemicals that act through different mechanisms, that act on different target systems, or that<br />
are toxicologically dissimilar in some other way should be considered to be independent <strong>of</strong> each<br />
other. The congeneric groups in essential oils are therefore considered separately.<br />
Further, the majority <strong>of</strong> individual constituents that comprise essential oils are themselves used as<br />
flavoring substances that pose no toxicological threat at doses that are magnitudes greater than their<br />
level <strong>of</strong> intake from the essential oil. Rulis (1987) reported that “The overwhelming majority <strong>of</strong> additives<br />
present a high likelihood <strong>of</strong> having safety assurance margins in excess <strong>of</strong> 10 5 .” He points out that<br />
this is particularly true for additives used in the USA at less than 100,000 lb/yr. Because more than<br />
90% <strong>of</strong> all flavoring ingredients are used at
Safety Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 201<br />
(+)-isomenthone, (−)-menthyl acetate, <strong>and</strong> other related substances. Samples <strong>of</strong> triple-distilled<br />
commercial cornmint oil may contain up to 95% <strong>of</strong> this congeneric group. The biochemical <strong>and</strong><br />
biological fate <strong>of</strong> this group <strong>of</strong> substances has been previously reviewed (Adams et al., 1996;<br />
JECFA, 1999). Key data on metabolism, toxicity, <strong>and</strong> carcinogenicity are cited below in order to<br />
complete the evaluation. Although constituents in this group are effectively detoxicated via conjugation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the corresponding alcohol or w-oxidation followed by conjugation <strong>and</strong> excretion<br />
(Yamaguchi et al., 1994; Madyastha <strong>and</strong> Srivatsan, 1988; Williams, 1940), the intake <strong>of</strong> the congeneric<br />
group (3044 μg/person/d or 3.04 mg/person/d; see Table 7.2) is higher than the exposure<br />
threshold <strong>of</strong> 540 μg/person/d or 0.540 mg/person/d for Structural Class II. Therefore, toxicity data<br />
are required for this congeneric group. In both short- <strong>and</strong> long-term studies (Madsen et al., 1986;<br />
JEFCA, 2000a), menthol, menthone, <strong>and</strong> other members <strong>of</strong> the group exhibit no-observable- adverseeffect-levels<br />
(NOAELs) at least 1000 times the daily PCI (“eaters only”) (3.04 mg/person/d or<br />
0.05 mg/kg bw/d) <strong>of</strong> this congeneric group resulting from intake <strong>of</strong> the essential oil. For members<br />
<strong>of</strong> this group, numerous in vitro <strong>and</strong> in vivo genotoxicity assays are consistently negative (Heck<br />
et al., 1989; Sasaki et al., 1989; Muller, 1993; Florin et al., 1980; Rivedal et al., 2000; Zamith et al.,<br />
1993; NTP Draft, 2003). Therefore, the intake <strong>of</strong> this congeneric group from consumption <strong>of</strong><br />
Mentha arvensis is not a safety concern.<br />
Although it is a constituent <strong>of</strong> cornmint oil <strong>and</strong> is also a terpene alicyclic ketone structurally<br />
related to the above congeneric group, pulegone exhibits a unique structure (i.e., 2-isopropylidenecyclohexanone)<br />
that participates in a well-recognized intoxication pathway (Figure 7.2)<br />
(McClanahan et al., 1989; Thomassen et al., 1992; Adams et al., 1996; Chen et al., 2001) that<br />
leads to the formation <strong>of</strong> menth<strong>of</strong>uran. This metabolite subsequently oxidizes <strong>and</strong> the ring opens<br />
to yield a highly reactive 2-ene-1,4-dicarbonyl intermediate that reacts readily with proteins<br />
resulting in hepatotoxicity at intake levels at least two orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude less than no observable<br />
effect levels for structurally related alicyclic ketones <strong>and</strong> secondary alcohols (menthone,<br />
carvone, <strong>and</strong> menthol). Therefore, pulegone <strong>and</strong> its metabolite (menth<strong>of</strong>uran), which account for<br />
2% <strong>of</strong> the composition <strong>of</strong> cornmint oil is a<br />
congeneric group <strong>of</strong> terpene hydrocarbons [(+) <strong>and</strong> (−)-pinene, (+) limonene, etc.]. Although these<br />
may contribute up to 8% <strong>of</strong> the oil, upon multiple redistillations during processing the hydrocarbon<br />
content can be significantly reduced (
202 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 7.2<br />
Safety Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Cornmint Oil, Mentha arvensis a<br />
Steps 2 <strong>and</strong> 3: Constituent<br />
Identification/Congeneric<br />
Grouping/Structural Class<br />
Assignment<br />
Step 4: Oil Composition<br />
by Congeneric Group,<br />
Resulting Intake Steps 5,6,7,8: Metabolism/Toxicology Data/Evaluation<br />
Congeneric Group<br />
Assignment<br />
Structural<br />
Class (TTC)<br />
(µg/Person/d)<br />
High % From<br />
Multiple<br />
Commercial<br />
Samples<br />
Intake<br />
(µg/<br />
Person/d) Metabolism Pathways<br />
Intake <strong>of</strong> Congeneric Group<br />
or Total <strong>of</strong> Unidentified<br />
Constituents Group < TTC<br />
for Class?<br />
Relevant Toxicity<br />
Data if Intake <strong>of</strong><br />
Group >TTC<br />
Secondary alicyclic<br />
saturated <strong>and</strong><br />
unsaturated<br />
alcohol/ketone/<br />
ketal/ester (e.g.,<br />
menthol, menthone,<br />
isomenthone,<br />
menthyl acetate)<br />
Aliphatic terpene<br />
hydrocarbon (e.g.,<br />
limonene, pinene)<br />
II (540) 95 3044 1. Glucuronic acid conjugation <strong>of</strong><br />
the alcohol followed by excretion<br />
in the urine<br />
2. w-Oxidation <strong>of</strong> the side chain<br />
substituents to yield various<br />
polyols <strong>and</strong> hydroxy acids<br />
<strong>and</strong> excreted as glucuronic acid<br />
conjugates<br />
I (1800) 8 256 1. w-Oxidation to yield polar<br />
hydroxy <strong>and</strong> carboxy metabolites<br />
excreted as glucuronic acid<br />
conjugates<br />
No, 3044 μg/person/d >540 μg/<br />
person/d<br />
Yes, 256 μg /person/d,
Safety Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 203<br />
2-Isopropylidene<br />
cyclohexanone <strong>and</strong><br />
metabolites<br />
(e.g., pulegone)<br />
III (90) 2 64 1. Reduction to yield menthone or<br />
isomenthone, followed by<br />
hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> ring or side<br />
chain positions <strong>and</strong> then<br />
conjugation with glucuronic acid<br />
2. Conjugation with glutathione in<br />
a Michael-type addition leading to<br />
mercapturic acid conjugates that<br />
are excreted or further<br />
hydroxylated <strong>and</strong> excreted<br />
3. Hydroxylation catalyzed by<br />
cytochrome P-450 to yield a series<br />
<strong>of</strong> ring- <strong>and</strong> side chainhydroxylated<br />
pulegone<br />
metabolites, one <strong>of</strong> which is a<br />
reactive 2-ene-1,4-dicarbonyl<br />
derivative. This intermediate is<br />
known to form protein adducts<br />
leading to enhanced toxicity<br />
(Austin et al., 1988)<br />
Note: In Steps 2 <strong>and</strong> 3, individual constituents <strong>and</strong> their assignment to structural classes are not shown.<br />
a<br />
Based on daily PCI <strong>of</strong> 3204 μg/person/d for cornmint oil, as determined in Step 1.<br />
Yes, 64 μg/person/d
204 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
Hydrolysis Reduction Isomerization<br />
H<br />
OAc<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
Isopulegyl<br />
acetate<br />
Isopulegol<br />
Isopulegone<br />
Pulegone<br />
9-Hydroxylation<br />
Glucuronic<br />
acid<br />
conjugate<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
9-Hydroxyisopulegone<br />
H<br />
O<br />
Menth<strong>of</strong>uran<br />
FIGURE 7.2 Metabolism <strong>of</strong> isopulegone, pulegone, <strong>and</strong> isopulegyl acetate.<br />
Finally, the essential oil itself is evaluated in the context <strong>of</strong> the combined intake <strong>of</strong> all congeneric<br />
groups <strong>and</strong> any other related data in Step 8. Interestingly, members <strong>of</strong> the terpene alicyclic secondary<br />
alcohols, ketones, <strong>and</strong> related esters, multiple members <strong>of</strong> the monoterpene hydrocarbons, <strong>and</strong><br />
peppermint oil itself show a common nephrotoxic effect recognized as a-2u-globulin nephropathy.<br />
The microscopic evidence <strong>of</strong> histopathology <strong>of</strong> the kidneys for male rats in the mint oil study is<br />
consistent with the presence <strong>of</strong> a-2u-globulin nephropathy. In addition, a st<strong>and</strong>ard immunoassay for<br />
detecting the presence <strong>of</strong> a-2u-globulin was performed on kidney sections from male <strong>and</strong> female<br />
rats in the mint oil study (Serota, 1990). Results <strong>of</strong> the assay confirmed the presence <strong>of</strong> a-2uglobulin<br />
nephropathy in male rats (Swenberg <strong>and</strong> Schoonhoven, 2002). This effect is found only in<br />
males rats <strong>and</strong> is not relevant to the human health assessment <strong>of</strong> cornmint oil. Other toxic interactions<br />
between congeneric groups are expected to be minimal given that the NOELs for the<br />
congeneric groups <strong>and</strong> those for finished mint oils are on the same order <strong>of</strong> magnitude.<br />
Based on the above assessment <strong>and</strong> the application <strong>of</strong> the scientific judgment, cornmint oil is<br />
concluded to be “GRAS” under conditions <strong>of</strong> intended use as a flavoring substance. Given the<br />
criteria used in the evaluation, recommended specifications should include the following chemical<br />
assay:<br />
1. Less than 95% alicyclic secondary alcohols, ketones, <strong>and</strong> related esters, typically measured<br />
as (−)-menthol.<br />
2. Less than 2% 2-isopropylidenecyclohexanones <strong>and</strong> their metabolites, measured as<br />
(−)-pulegone.<br />
3. Less than 10% monoterpene hydrocarbons, typically measured as limonene.
Safety Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 205<br />
7.6 SUMMARY<br />
The safety evaluation <strong>of</strong> an essential oil is performed in the context <strong>of</strong> all available data for congeneric<br />
groups <strong>of</strong> identified constituents <strong>and</strong> the group <strong>of</strong> unidentified constituents, data on the<br />
essential oil or a related essential oil, <strong>and</strong> any potential interactions that may occur in the essential<br />
oil when consumed as a flavoring substance.<br />
The guide provides a chemically based approach to the safety evaluation <strong>of</strong> an essential oil. The<br />
approach depends on a thorough quantitative analysis <strong>of</strong> the chemical constituents in the essential<br />
oil intended for commerce. The chemical constituents are then assigned to well-defined congeneric<br />
groups that are established based on extensive biochemical <strong>and</strong> toxicologic information, <strong>and</strong> this<br />
is evaluated in the context <strong>of</strong> intake <strong>of</strong> the congeneric group resulting from consumption <strong>of</strong> the<br />
essential oil. The intake <strong>of</strong> unidentified constituents considers the consumption <strong>of</strong> the essential<br />
oil as a food, a highly conservative toxicologic threshold, <strong>and</strong> toxicity data on the essential oil<br />
or an essential oil <strong>of</strong> similar chemical composition. The flexibility <strong>of</strong> the guide is reflected in the<br />
fact that high intake <strong>of</strong> major congeneric groups <strong>of</strong> low toxicologic concern will be evaluated<br />
along with low intake <strong>of</strong> minor congeneric groups <strong>of</strong> significant toxicological concern (i.e., higher<br />
structural class). The guide also provides a comprehensive evaluation <strong>of</strong> all congeneric groups<br />
<strong>and</strong> constituents that account for the majority <strong>of</strong> the composition <strong>of</strong> the essential oil. The overall<br />
objective <strong>of</strong> the guide is to organize <strong>and</strong> prioritize the chemical constituents <strong>of</strong> an essential oil<br />
in order that no reasonably possible significant risk associated with the intake <strong>of</strong> essential oil goes<br />
unevaluated.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Adams, T.B., S. Cohen, J. Doull, V.J. Feron, J.I. Goodman, L.J. Marnett, I.C. Munro, et al., 2004. The FEMA<br />
GRAS assessment <strong>of</strong> cinnamyl derivatives used as flavor ingredients. Food Chem. Toxicol., 42:<br />
157–185.<br />
Adams, T.B., S.M. Cohen, J. Doull, V.J. Feron, J.I. Goodman, L.J. Marnett, I.C. Munro, et al., 2005. The FEMA<br />
GRAS assessment <strong>of</strong> benzyl derivatives used as flavor ingredients, Food Chem. Toxicol., 43: 1207–1240.<br />
Adams, T.B., M.M. McGowen, M.C. Williams, S.M. Cohen, V.J. Feron, J.I. Goodman, L.J. Marnett, et al.,<br />
2007. The FEMA GRAS assessment <strong>of</strong> aromatic substituted secondary alcohols, ketones, <strong>and</strong> related<br />
esters used as flavor ingredients. Food Chem. Toxicol., 45: 171–201.<br />
Adams, T.B., J. Doull, J.I. Goodman, I.C. Munro, P.M. Newberne, P.S. Portoghese, R.L. Smith, et al., 1997.<br />
The FEMA GRAS assessment <strong>of</strong> furfural used as a flavor ingredient. Food Chem. Toxicol., 35: 739–751.<br />
Adams, T.B., D.B. Greer, J. Doull, I.C. Munro, P.M. Newberne, P.S. Portoghese, R.L. Smith, et al., 1998.<br />
The FEMA GRAS assessment <strong>of</strong> lactones used as flavor ingredients. Food Chem. Toxicol., 36: 249–278.<br />
Adams, T.B., J.B. Hallagan, J.M. Putman, T.L. Gierke, J. Doull, I.C. Munro, P.M. Newberne, et al., 1996.<br />
TheFEMA GRAS assessment <strong>of</strong> alicyclic substances used as flavor ingredients. Food Chem. Toxicol.,<br />
34: 763–828.<br />
Arct<strong>and</strong>er, S., 1969. Perfume <strong>and</strong> Flavor Chemicals. Vol. 1. New Jersey: Rutgers University (1081).<br />
Austin, C.A., E.A. Shephard, S.F. Pike, B.R. Rabin, <strong>and</strong> I.R. Phillips, 1988. The effect <strong>of</strong> terpenoid compounds<br />
on cytochrome P-450 levels in rat liver. Biochem. Pharmacol., 37(11): 2223–2229.<br />
Chen, L., E.H. Lebetkin, <strong>and</strong> L.T. Burka, 2001. Metabolism <strong>of</strong> (R)-(+)-pulegone in F344 rats. Drug Metabol.<br />
Dispos., 29(12): 1567–1577.<br />
Cramer, G., R. Ford, <strong>and</strong> R. Hall, 1978. Estimation <strong>of</strong> toxic hazard—a decision tree approach. Food Cosmet.<br />
Toxicol., 16: 255–276.<br />
Crowell, P., C.E. Elson, H. Bailey, A. Elegbede, J. Haag, <strong>and</strong> M. Gould, 1994. Human metabolism <strong>of</strong> the experimental<br />
cancer therapeutic agent d-limonene. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 35: 31–37.<br />
Dioscoides (50 ad) Inquiry into Plants <strong>and</strong> Growth <strong>of</strong> Plants—Theophrastus, De Materia Medica.<br />
EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), 1988. Technical Support Document on Risk Assessment <strong>of</strong><br />
Chemical Mixtures. EPA-600/8-90/064. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office<br />
<strong>of</strong> Research <strong>and</strong> Development.<br />
European Communities (EC), 1999. Commission <strong>of</strong> European Communities Regulation No. 2232/96.<br />
European Flavour <strong>and</strong> Fragrance Association (EFFA), 2005. European inquiry on volume use. Private communication<br />
to the Flavor <strong>and</strong> Extract Manufacturers Association (FEMA), Washington, DC, U.S.A.
206 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Food Chemical Codex (FCC), 2008. Food Chemicals Codex, 6th ed. Rockville, MD: United States Pharmacopeia<br />
(USP).<br />
Food <strong>and</strong> Drug Administration, 2005. Threshold <strong>of</strong> regulation for substances used in food-contact articles. 21<br />
CFR 170.39.<br />
Flavor <strong>and</strong> Extract Manufacturers Association (FEMA), 1975. Scientific literature review <strong>of</strong> alicyclic substances<br />
used as flavor ingredients. U.S. National Technical Information Services, PB86-1558351/LL.<br />
Florin, I., L. Rutberg, M. Curvall, <strong>and</strong> C.R. Enzell, 1980. Screening <strong>of</strong> tobacco smoke constituents for mutagenicity<br />
using the Ames test. Toxicology, 18: 219–232.<br />
Gavin, C.L., M.C. Williams, <strong>and</strong> J.B. Hallagan, 2008. Poundage <strong>and</strong> Technical Effects Update Survey, The<br />
Flavor <strong>and</strong> Extract Manufacturers Association <strong>of</strong> the United States, p. 2008.<br />
Hall, R.L., 1976. Estimating the distribution <strong>of</strong> daily intakes <strong>of</strong> certain GRAS substances. Comm. On GRAS<br />
list survey-Phase III. Nat’l. Acad. Of <strong>Science</strong>s/Nat;l. Res. Council. Washington, DC.<br />
Hall, R.L. <strong>and</strong> B.L. Oser, 1968. Recent progress in the consideration <strong>of</strong> flavoring substances under the Food<br />
Additives Amendment. Food Technol., 19(2): 151.<br />
Hall, R.L. <strong>and</strong> R.A. Ford, 1999. Comparison <strong>of</strong> two methods to assess the intake <strong>of</strong> flavoring substances. Food<br />
Add. Contam., 16: 481–495.<br />
Heck, J.D., T.A. Vollmuth, M.A. Cifone, D.R. Jagannath, B. Myhr, <strong>and</strong> R.D. Curren, 1989. An evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />
food flavoring ingredients in a genetic toxicity screening battery. Toxicologist, 9(1): 257.<br />
Ishida, T., Y. Asakawa, T. Takemoto, <strong>and</strong> T. Aratani, 1981. Terpenoids biotransformation in mammals III:<br />
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> alpha-pinene, beta-pinene, 3-carene, carane, myrcene, <strong>and</strong> p-cymene in rabbits.<br />
J. Pharm. Sci., 70(40): 406–415.<br />
Japanese Flavor <strong>and</strong> Fragrance Manufacturers Association (JFFMA), 2002. Japanese inquiry on volume use. Private<br />
communication to the Flavor <strong>and</strong> Extract Manufacturers Association (FEMA), Washington, DC, USA.<br />
JECFA, 1997. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> certain food additives <strong>and</strong> contaminants. Forty-sixth Report <strong>of</strong> the Joint FAO/<br />
WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. WHO Technical Report Series 868. World Health<br />
Organization, Geneva.<br />
JECFA, 1998. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> certain food additives <strong>and</strong> contaminants. Forty-seventh Report <strong>of</strong> the Joint FAO/<br />
WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. WHO Technical Report Series 876. World Health<br />
Organization, Geneva.<br />
JECFA, 1999. Procedure for the Safety Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Flavouring Agents. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> certain food additives<br />
<strong>and</strong> contaminants. Forty-ninth Report <strong>of</strong> the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives.<br />
WHO Technical Report Series 884. World Health Organization, Geneva.<br />
JECFA, 2000a. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> certain food additives <strong>and</strong> contaminants. Fifty-first Report <strong>of</strong> the Joint FAO/<br />
WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. WHO Technical Report Series, No. 891. World Health<br />
Organization, Geneva.<br />
JECFA, 2000b. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> certain food additives <strong>and</strong> contaminants. Fifty-third Report <strong>of</strong> the Joint FAO/<br />
WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. WHO Technical Report Series, No. 896. World Health<br />
Organization, Geneva.<br />
JECFA, 2001. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> certain food additives <strong>and</strong> contaminants. Fifty-fifth Report <strong>of</strong> the Joint FAO/WHO<br />
Expert Committee on Food Additives. WHO Technical Report Series, No. 901. World Health Organization,<br />
Geneva.<br />
JECFA, 2002. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> certain food additives <strong>and</strong> contaminants. Fifty-ninth Report <strong>of</strong> the Joint FAO/<br />
WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. WHO Technical Report Series No. 913. World Health<br />
Organization, Geneva.<br />
JECFA, 2003. Safety Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Certain Food Additives: Prepared by the Fifty-Ninth Meeting <strong>of</strong> the Joint<br />
FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), WHO Food Additives Series: 50; International<br />
Programme on Chemical Safety, IPCS, World Health Organization, Geneva.<br />
JECFA, 2004. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> certain food additives <strong>and</strong> contaminants. Sixty-first Report <strong>of</strong> the Joint FAO/WHO<br />
Expert Committee on Food Additives. WHO Technical Report Series No. 922. World Health Organization,<br />
Geneva.<br />
Lambe J., P. Cadby, <strong>and</strong> M. Gibney, 2002. Comparison <strong>of</strong> stochastic modeling <strong>of</strong> the intakes <strong>of</strong> intentionally<br />
added flavouring substances with theoretical added maximum daily intakes (TAMDI) <strong>and</strong> maximized<br />
survey-derived daily intakes (MSDI). Food Add. Contam., 19(1): 2–14.<br />
Lucas, C.D., J.M. Putnam, <strong>and</strong> J.B. Hallagan, 1999. Flavor <strong>and</strong> Extract Manufacturers Association (FEMA) <strong>of</strong><br />
the United States. 1995 Poundage <strong>and</strong> Technical Effects Update Survey. Washington DC.<br />
Maarse, H., C.A. Visscher, L.C. Willemsens, <strong>and</strong> M.H. Boelens, 1992, 1994, 2000. Volatile Components in<br />
Food-Qualitative <strong>and</strong> Quantitative Data. Centraal Instituut Voor Voedingsonderzioek TNO: Zeist, The<br />
Netherl<strong>and</strong>s.
Safety Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 207<br />
Madsen, C., G. Wurtzen, <strong>and</strong> J. Carstensen, 1986. Short-term toxicity in rats dosed with menthone. Toxicol.<br />
Lett., 32: 147–152.<br />
Madyastha, K.M. <strong>and</strong> V. Srivatsan, 1987. Metabolism <strong>of</strong> beta-myrcene in vivo <strong>and</strong> in vitro: Its effects on ratliver<br />
microsomal enzymes. Xenobiotica, 17(5): 539–549.<br />
Madyastha, K.M. <strong>and</strong> V. Srivatsan, 1988. Studies on the metabolism <strong>of</strong> l-menthol in rats. Drug Metabol.<br />
Dispos., 16: 765.<br />
McClanahan, R.H., D. Thomassen, J.T. Slattery, <strong>and</strong> S.D. Nelson, 1989. Metabolic activation <strong>of</strong> (R)-(+)-<br />
pulegone to a reactive enonal that covalently binds to mouse liver proteins. Chem. Res. Toxicol., 2(5):<br />
349–355.<br />
Miyazawa, M., M. Shindo, <strong>and</strong> T. Shimada, 2002. Sex differences in the metabolism <strong>of</strong> (+)- <strong>and</strong> (−)-limonene<br />
enantiomers to carveol <strong>and</strong> perillyl alcohol derivatives by cytochrome P-450 enzymes in rat liver<br />
microsomes. Chem. Res. Toxicol., 15(1): 15–20.<br />
Muller, W., 1993. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> mutagencity testing with Salmonella typhimurium TA102 in three different<br />
laboratories. Environ. Health Perspect., 101(Suppl. 3): 33–36.<br />
Munro, I.C., R.A. Ford, E. Kennepohl, <strong>and</strong> J.G. Sprenger, 1996. Correlation <strong>of</strong> structural class with no-observedeffect-levels:<br />
A proposal for establishing a threshold <strong>of</strong> concern. Food Chem. Toxicol., 34: 829–867.<br />
Munro, I.C., R.A. Ford, E. Kennepohl, <strong>and</strong> J.G. Sprenger, 1996. Thresholds <strong>of</strong> toxicological concern based on<br />
structure-activity relationships. Drug Metabol. Rev., 28(1/2): 209–217.<br />
National Academy <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s (NAS), 1965, 1970, 1975, 1981, 1982, 1987. Evaluating the Safety <strong>of</strong> Food<br />
Chemicals. Washington, DC.<br />
National Cancer Institute (NCI), 1979. Bioassay <strong>of</strong> dl-menthol for possible carcinogenicity. U.S. Department<br />
<strong>of</strong> Health, Education <strong>and</strong> Welfare. National Technical Report Series No. 98.<br />
National Research Council (NRC), 1988. Complex Mixtures: Methods for In Vivo Toxicity Testing. Washington,<br />
DC: National Academy Press.<br />
National Research Council (NRC), 1994. <strong>Science</strong> <strong>and</strong> Judgment in Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: National<br />
Academy Press.<br />
National Toxicology Program (NTP), 1990. Carcinogenicity <strong>and</strong> toxicology studies <strong>of</strong> d-limonene in F344/N<br />
rats <strong>and</strong> B6C3F1 mice. NTP-TR-347. U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Health <strong>and</strong> Human Services. NIH Publication<br />
No. 90-2802. National. Toxicology Program, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />
National Toxicology Program (NTP), 2002. Toxicity studies <strong>of</strong> pulegone in B6C3F1 mice <strong>and</strong> rats (Gavage<br />
studies). Battelle Research Laboratories, Study No. G004164-X. Unpublished Report. National.<br />
Toxicology Program, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />
National Toxicology Program (NTP), 2003a. Draft report on the initial study results from a 90-day toxicity<br />
study on beta-myrcene in mice <strong>and</strong> rats. Study number C99023 <strong>and</strong> A06528. National Toxicology<br />
Program, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />
Newberne, P., R.L. Smith, J. Doull, J.I. Goodman, I.C. Munro, P.S. Portoghese, B.M. Wagner, C.S. Weil,<br />
L.A. Woods, T.B. Adams, C.D. Lucas, <strong>and</strong> R.A. Ford, 1999. The FEMA GRAS assessment <strong>of</strong> transanethole<br />
used as a flavoring substance. Food Chem. Toxicol., 37: 789–811.<br />
Nijssen, B., K. van Ingen-Visscher, <strong>and</strong> J. Donders, 2003. Volatile compounds in food 8.1. Centraal Instituut<br />
Voor Voedingsonderzioek TNO: Zeist, The Netherl<strong>and</strong>s. Available at http://www.vcf-online.nl/<br />
VcfHome.cfm.<br />
Oser, O.M. 1958. Toxicological Screening <strong>of</strong> Components <strong>of</strong> Food Flavours. Class VI. Citronellol <strong>and</strong> Linalool.<br />
East Rutherford, NJ: The Trubek Laboratories, Inc.<br />
Oser, B.L. <strong>and</strong> R.A. Ford, 1972. Recent progress in the consideration <strong>of</strong> flavoring ingredients under the Food<br />
Additives Amendment. 5 GRAS Substances. Food Technol., 26(5): 35–42.<br />
Oser, B.L. <strong>and</strong> R.A. Ford, 1973. Recent progress in the consideration <strong>of</strong> flavoring ingredients under the Food<br />
Additives Amendment. 6 GRAS Substances. Food Technol., 27(1): 64–67.<br />
Oser, B.L. <strong>and</strong> R.A. Ford, 1979. Recent progress in the consideration <strong>of</strong> flavoring ingredients under the Food<br />
Additives Amendment. 12 GRAS Substances. Food Technol., 33(7): 65–73.<br />
Oser, B. <strong>and</strong> R. Ford, 1991. FEMA Expert Panel: 30 years <strong>of</strong> safety evaluation for the flavor industry. Food<br />
Technol., 45(11): 84–97.<br />
Oser, B. <strong>and</strong> R. Hall, 1977. Criteria employed by the Expert Panel <strong>of</strong> FEMA for the GRAS evaluation <strong>of</strong> flavoring<br />
substances. Food Cosmet. Toxicol., 15: 457–466.<br />
Poon, G., D. Vigushin, L.J. Griggs, M.G. Rowl<strong>and</strong>s, R.C. Coombes, <strong>and</strong> M. Jarman, 1996. Identification <strong>and</strong><br />
characterization <strong>of</strong> limonene metabolites in patients with advanced cancer by liquid chromatography/<br />
mass spectrometry. Drug Metabol. Dispos., 24: 565–571.<br />
Presidential Commission on Risk Management <strong>and</strong> Risk Assessment, 1996. Risk assessment <strong>and</strong> risk management<br />
in regulatory decision making. Final Report, Vols. 1 <strong>and</strong> 2.
208 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Rivedal, E., S.O. Mikalsen, <strong>and</strong> T. Sanner, 2000. Morphological transformation <strong>and</strong> effect on gap junction<br />
intercellular communication in Syrian Hamster embryo cells screening tests for carcinogens devoid <strong>of</strong><br />
mutagenic activity. Toxicol. In Vitro, 14(2): 185–192.<br />
Roe, F. <strong>and</strong> W. Field, 1965. Chronic toxicity <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> certain other products <strong>of</strong> natural origin. Food<br />
Cosmet. Toxicol., 3: 311–324.<br />
Rulis, A.M., 1987. De Minimis <strong>and</strong> the threshold <strong>of</strong> regulation. In Food Protection <strong>Technology</strong>, Chapt. 2:<br />
pp. 29–37, Michigan: Chelsea/Lewis.<br />
Rulis, A.M., D.G. Hattan, <strong>and</strong> V.H. Morgenroth, 1984. FDA’s priority-based assessment <strong>of</strong> food additives.<br />
Preliminary results. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 4: 37–56.<br />
Sasaki,Y.F., H. Imanishi, T. Ohta, <strong>and</strong> Y. Shirasu, 1989. Modifying effects <strong>of</strong> components <strong>of</strong> plant essence on<br />
the induction <strong>of</strong> sister-chromatic exchanges in cultured Chinese hamster ovary cells. Mutat. Res., 226(1):<br />
103–110.<br />
Schilter, B., C. Andersson, R. Anton, A. Constable, J. Kleiner, J. O’Brien, A.G. Renwick, O. Korver, F. Smit,<br />
<strong>and</strong> R. Walker, 2003. Guidance for the safety assessment <strong>of</strong> botanicals <strong>and</strong> botanical preparations for use<br />
in food <strong>and</strong> food supplements. Food Chem. Toxicol., 41: 1625–1649.<br />
Serota, D., 1990. 28-Day toxicity study in rats. Hazelton Laboratories America, HLA Study No. 642–477.<br />
Private Communication to FEMA. Unpublished Report.<br />
Smith, R.L., T.B. Adams, J. Doull, V.J. Feron, J.I. Goodman, L.J. Marnett, P.S. Portoghese, et al., 2002b. Safety<br />
assessment <strong>of</strong> allylalkoxybenzene derivatives used as flavoring substances—Methyleugenol <strong>and</strong> estragole.<br />
Food Chem. Toxicol., 40: 851–870.<br />
Smith, R.L., S. Cohen, J. Doull, V.J. Feron, J.I. Goodman, L.J. Marnett, P.S. Portoghese, W.J. Waddell,<br />
B.M. Wagner, <strong>and</strong> T.B. Adams, 2003. Recent progress in the consideration <strong>of</strong> flavor ingredients under the<br />
Food Additives Amendment. 21 GRAS Substances. Food Technol., 57(5): 1–11.<br />
Smith, R.L., S. Cohen, J. Doull, V.J. Feron, J.I. Goodman, L.J. Marnett, P.S. Portoghese, W.J. Waddell,<br />
B.M. Wagner, <strong>and</strong> T.B. Adams, 2004. Safety evaluation <strong>of</strong> natural flavour complexes. Toxicol. Lett., 149:<br />
197–207.<br />
Smith, R.L., S.M. Cohen, J. Doull, V.J. Feron, J.I. Goodman, L.J. Marnett, I.C. Munro, et al., 2005a. Criteria for<br />
the safety evaluation <strong>of</strong> flavoring substances—The Expert Panel <strong>of</strong> the Flavor <strong>and</strong> Extract Manufacturers<br />
Association. Food Chem. Toxicol., 43: 1141–1177.<br />
Smith, R.L., S.M. Cohen, J. Doull, V.J. Feron, J.I. Goodman, L.J. Marnett, P.S. Portoghese, et al., 2005b. A<br />
procedure for the safety evaluation <strong>of</strong> natural flavor complexes used as ingredients in food: <strong>Essential</strong> oils.<br />
Food Chem. Toxicol., 43: 345–363.<br />
Smith, R.L., J. Doull, V.J. Feron, J.I. Goodman, L.J. Marnett, I.C. Munro, P.M. Newberne, et al., 2002a. The<br />
FEMA GRAS assessment <strong>of</strong> pyrazine derivatives used as flavor ingredients. Food Chem. Toxicol., 40:<br />
429–451.<br />
Smith, R.L., P. Newberne, T.B. Adams, R.A. Ford, J.B. Hallagan, <strong>and</strong> the FEMA Expert Panel, 1996. GRAS<br />
flavoring substances 17. Food Technol., 50(10): 72–81.<br />
Splindler, P. <strong>and</strong> C. Madsen, 1992. Subchronic toxicity study <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil in rats. Toxicol. Lett., 62:<br />
215–220.<br />
St<strong>of</strong>berg, J. <strong>and</strong> F. Grundschober, 1987. Consumption ratio <strong>and</strong> food predominance <strong>of</strong> flavoring materials. Perf.<br />
Flav., 12: 27.<br />
Swenberg, J. <strong>and</strong> R. Schoonhoven, 2002. Private communication to FEMA.<br />
Thomassen, D., N. Knebel, J.T. Slattery, R.H. McClanahan, <strong>and</strong> S.D. Nelson, 1992. Reactive intermediates in<br />
the oxidation <strong>of</strong> menth<strong>of</strong>uran by cytochrome P-450. Crit. Rev. Toxicol., 5(1): 123–130.<br />
Vigushin, D., G.K. Poon, A. Boddy, J. English, G.W. Halbert, C. Pagonis, M. Jarman, <strong>and</strong> R.C. Coombes, 1998.<br />
Phase I <strong>and</strong> pharmacokinetic study <strong>of</strong> d-limonene in patients with advanced cancer. Cancer Chemother<br />
Pharmacol., 42(2): 111–117.<br />
Williams, R.T., 1940. Studies in detoxication. 7. The biological reduction <strong>of</strong> l-Menthone to d-neomenthol <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> d-isomenthone to d-isomenthol in the rabbit. The conjugation <strong>of</strong> d-neomenthol with glucuronic acid.<br />
Biochem. J., 34: 690–697.<br />
Woods, L. <strong>and</strong> J. Doull, 1991. GRAS evaluation <strong>of</strong> flavoring substances by the Expert Panel <strong>of</strong> FEMA. Regul.<br />
Toxicol. Pharmacol., 14(1): 48–58.<br />
Yamaguchi, T., J. Caldwell, <strong>and</strong> P.B. Farmer, 1994. Metabolic fate <strong>of</strong> [ 3 H]-l-menthol in the rat. Drug Metabol.<br />
Dispos., 22: 616–624.<br />
Zamith, H.P., M.N.P. Vidal, G. Speit, <strong>and</strong> F.J.R. Paumgartten, 1993. Absence <strong>of</strong> genotoxic activity <strong>of</strong> betamyrcene<br />
in the in vivo cytogenetic bone marrow assay. Brazilian J. Med. Biol. Res., 26: 93–98.
8<br />
Metabolism <strong>of</strong> Terpenoids in<br />
Animal Models <strong>and</strong> Humans<br />
Walter Jäger<br />
CONTENTS<br />
8.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 209<br />
8.2 Metabolism <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenes ............................................................................................ 210<br />
8.2.1 Camphene .............................................................................................................. 210<br />
8.2.2 Camphor ................................................................................................................ 210<br />
8.2.3 Carvacrol ............................................................................................................... 212<br />
8.2.4 Carvone ................................................................................................................. 213<br />
8.2.5 1,4-Cineole ............................................................................................................ 213<br />
8.2.6 1,8-Cineole ............................................................................................................ 214<br />
8.2.7 Citral ...................................................................................................................... 216<br />
8.2.8 Citronellal .............................................................................................................. 217<br />
8.2.9 Fenchone ................................................................................................................ 217<br />
8.2.10 Geraniol ................................................................................................................. 218<br />
8.2.11 Limonene ............................................................................................................... 218<br />
8.2.12 Linalool .................................................................................................................. 219<br />
8.2.13 Linalyl Acetate ...................................................................................................... 221<br />
8.2.14 Menthol .................................................................................................................. 221<br />
8.2.15 Myrcene ................................................................................................................. 223<br />
8.2.16 Pinene .................................................................................................................... 223<br />
8.2.17 Pulegone ................................................................................................................ 225<br />
8.2.18 a-Terpineol ............................................................................................................ 225<br />
8.2.19 a- <strong>and</strong> b-Thujone ................................................................................................... 225<br />
8.2.20 Thymol .................................................................................................................. 226<br />
8.3 Metabolism <strong>of</strong> Sesquiterpenes .......................................................................................... 227<br />
8.3.1 Caryophyllene ........................................................................................................ 227<br />
8.3.2 Farnesol ................................................................................................................. 227<br />
8.3.3 Longifolene ............................................................................................................ 229<br />
8.3.4 Patchouli Alcohol .................................................................................................. 230<br />
References .................................................................................................................................. 232<br />
8.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
Terpenoids are main constituents <strong>of</strong> plant-derived essential oils. Because <strong>of</strong> their pleasant odor or<br />
flavor they are widely used in the food, fragrance, <strong>and</strong> pharmaceutical industry. Furthermore, in<br />
traditional medicine, terpenoids are also well known for their analeptic, antibacterial, antifungal,<br />
209
210 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
antitumor, <strong>and</strong> sedative activities. Although large amounts are used in the industry, the knowledge<br />
about their biotransformation in humans is still scarce. Yet, metabolism <strong>of</strong> terpenoids can lead to the<br />
formation <strong>of</strong> new biotransformation products with unique structures <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten different flavor <strong>and</strong><br />
biological activities compared to the parent compounds.<br />
All terpenoids easily enter the human body by oral absorption, penetration through the skin, or<br />
inhalation very <strong>of</strong>ten leading to measurable blood concentrations. A number <strong>of</strong> different enzymes,<br />
however, readily metabolize these compounds to more water-soluble molecules. Although nearly<br />
every tissue has the ability to metabolize drugs, the liver is the most important organ <strong>of</strong> drug<br />
biotransformation. In general, metabolic biotransformation occurs at two major categories called<br />
Phase I <strong>and</strong> Phase II reactions (Spatzenegger <strong>and</strong> Jäger, 1995). Phase I concerns mostly cytochrome<br />
P450 (CYP)-mediated oxidation as well as reduction <strong>and</strong> hydrolysis. Phase II is a further step where<br />
a Phase I product is completely transformed to high water solubility. This is done by attaching<br />
already highly water-soluble endogenous entities such as sugars (glucuronic acids) or salts (sulfates)<br />
to the Phase I intermediate <strong>and</strong> forming a Phase II final product. It is not always necessary for a<br />
compound to undergo both Phases I <strong>and</strong> II; indeed for many terpenoids one or the other is enough<br />
to eliminate these volatile plant constituents.<br />
In the following concise review, special emphasis will be put on metabolism <strong>of</strong> selected mono<strong>and</strong><br />
sesquiterpenoids not only in animal <strong>and</strong> in vitro models but also in humans.<br />
8.2 METABOLISM OF MONOTERPENES<br />
8.2.1 CAMPHENE<br />
Camphene is found in many plants at high concentrations, especially in the essential oil <strong>of</strong> the leaves<br />
<strong>and</strong> flowers <strong>of</strong> Thymus vulgaris. Based on expectorant, spasmolytic, <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial properties,<br />
camphene-containing remedies are successfully used in the treatment against cough <strong>and</strong> infections<br />
<strong>of</strong> the respiratory tract. The far greatest amount <strong>of</strong> camphene, however, is used in the liquor industry<br />
(Wichtel, 2002). Data about the in vivo metabolism <strong>of</strong> camphene are scarce as there is only one<br />
publication demonstrating various biotransformation products in the urine <strong>of</strong> rabbits after its oral<br />
administration. As shown in Figure 8.1, camphene is metabolized into two diasteromeric glycols<br />
(camphene-2,10-glycols). Their formation obviously involves two isomeric epoxide intermediates,<br />
which are hydrated by epoxide hydrolase. Further metabolites, namely 6-hydroxycamphene,<br />
7-hydroxycamphene, 3-hydroxytricyclene, <strong>and</strong> 10-hydroxytricyclene, were apparently formed<br />
through the nonclassical cation intermediate (shown in brackets), structures <strong>of</strong> which were identified<br />
by IR, UV NMR, mass spectrometry, <strong>and</strong> chemical degradation (Ishida et al., 1979). So far, there<br />
are no studies available about the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> camphene in human liver microsomes or in<br />
human subjects.<br />
8.2.2 CAMPHOR<br />
Camphor, a bicyclic monoterpene, is extracted from the woods <strong>of</strong> Cinnamomum camphora, a tree<br />
located in Southeast Asia <strong>and</strong> North America. Furthermore, it is also one <strong>of</strong> the major constituents<br />
<strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> common sage (Salvia <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis). Solid camphor forms white, fatty crystals<br />
with intensive camphoraceous odor <strong>and</strong> is used commercially as a moth repellent <strong>and</strong> preservative<br />
in pharmaceuticals <strong>and</strong> cosmetics (Wichtel, 2002). In dogs, rabbits, <strong>and</strong> rats, camphor is extensively<br />
metabolized whereas the major hydroxylation products <strong>of</strong> d- <strong>and</strong> l-camphor were 5-endo-<strong>and</strong><br />
5-exo-hydroxycamphor. A small amount was also identified as 3-endo-hydroxycamphor (Figure 8.2).<br />
Both 3- <strong>and</strong> 5-bornane groups can be further reduced to 2,5-bornanedione. Minor biotransformation<br />
steps also involve the reduction <strong>of</strong> camphor to borneol <strong>and</strong> isoborneol. Interestingly, all hydroxylated<br />
camphor metabolites are further conjugated in a Phase II reaction with glucuronic acid
Metabolism <strong>of</strong> Terpenoids in Animal Models <strong>and</strong> Humans 211<br />
Camphene<br />
Rabbit<br />
in vivo<br />
O<br />
+<br />
O<br />
Rabbit<br />
in vivo<br />
OH<br />
10-Hydroxytricyclene<br />
+<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
Camphene-2,10-glycol<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
Camphene-2,10-glycol<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
7-Hydroxycamphene 6-exo-Hydroxycamphene 3-Hydroxytricyclene<br />
FIGURE 8.1 Urinary excretion <strong>of</strong> camphene metabolites in rabbits. (Adapted from Ishida, T. et al., 1979.<br />
J. Pharm. Sci., 68: 928–930; Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus von Monterpenen und Sesquiterpenen in<br />
Mensch und Säugetier: Bedeutung für die pharmazeutische Praxis. MPharm. diploma thesis, University <strong>of</strong><br />
Vienna, Austria.)<br />
O<br />
Human, rat, rabbit, dog<br />
in vitro<br />
Rabbit<br />
in vivo<br />
Camphor<br />
Rabbit<br />
in vitro/in vivo<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
+<br />
3-endo-Hydroxycamphor<br />
not in vitro human<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
+<br />
5-endo-Hydroxycamphor<br />
not in vitro human<br />
O<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
5-exo-Hydroxycamphor<br />
not in vivo rabbit<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
Borneol<br />
Isoborneol<br />
O<br />
2,3-Bornanedione<br />
FIGURE 8.2 Metabolisms <strong>of</strong> camphor in dogs, rabbits, <strong>and</strong> rats. (Adapted from Leibmann, K.C. <strong>and</strong> E.<br />
Ortiz, 1972. Drug Metab. Dispos., 1: 543–551; Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus von Monterpenen und<br />
Sesquiterpenen in Mensch und Säugetier: Bedeutung für die pharmazeutische Praxis. MPharm. diploma<br />
thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Austria; Gyoubu, K. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2007. Biol. Pharm. Bull., 30: 230–233.)<br />
O<br />
2,5-Bornanedione
212 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
(Leibmann <strong>and</strong> Ortiz, 1972; Gyoubu <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 2007). Based on animal data, camphor should<br />
be also extensively metabolized in humans. Indeed, a very recent study using human liver microsomes<br />
could also show hydroxylation to 5-exo-hydroxycamphor. The formation <strong>of</strong> other metabolites<br />
namely borneol, isoborneol, <strong>and</strong> various glucuronides are therefore also suggested in the blood <strong>and</strong><br />
urine <strong>of</strong> human volunteers after oral administration <strong>of</strong> camphor.<br />
8.2.3 CARVACROL<br />
Carvacrol is a monoterpenic alcohol which is found in high concentrations (3–5%) in the essential<br />
oil <strong>of</strong> Thymus vulgaris, a plant widely distributed in Middle <strong>and</strong> South Europe. Carvacrol is reportedly<br />
used as a flavor additive in a number <strong>of</strong> foods <strong>and</strong> beverages (Wichtel, 2002). Screening the<br />
literature for its metabolism, only one study could be found investigating biotransformation product<br />
in rat urine after oral application. In rat, only small amounts <strong>of</strong> unchanged carvacrol were excreted<br />
after 24 h. Based on the sample preparation protocol using b-glucuronidase <strong>and</strong> sulfatase before GC<br />
analysis, carvacrol might also be excreted as their glucuronide <strong>and</strong> sulfate, respectively. An interesting<br />
feature <strong>of</strong> this study is the demonstration that both <strong>of</strong> the aliphatic groups present undergo<br />
extensive meta bolism. Noteworthy is also the fact that aromatic hydroxylation to 2,3-dihydroxy-pcymene<br />
is only a minor important pathway for carvacrol. Further oxidation <strong>of</strong> 2-hydroxymethyl-5-<br />
(1-methylethyl)-phenol may also take place leading to the monocarboxylic acid metabolite, whose<br />
chemical structure was identified as 2-hydroxymethyl-4-(1-methyl)benzoic acid (Austgulen et al.,<br />
1987) (Figure 8.3). There currently are not any studies available in the literature about carvacrol<br />
biotransformation in humans.<br />
OH<br />
Rat<br />
in vivo<br />
OH<br />
Rat<br />
in vivo<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
2,3-Dihydroxy-p-cymene<br />
Rat<br />
in vivo<br />
OH<br />
Carvacrol<br />
Rat<br />
in vivo<br />
OH<br />
2-(3-Hydroxy-4-methylphenyl)propan-2-ol<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
2-(3-Hydroxy-4-methylphenyl)propan-1-ol<br />
2-Hydroxymethyl-5-(1-methylethyl)phenol<br />
OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
2-(3-Hydroxy-4-methylphenyl)propionic acid<br />
2-Hydroxymethyl-4-(1-methylethyl)benzoic acid<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
2-(4-Hydroxymethyl-3-hydroxyphenyl)propan-1-ol<br />
FIGURE 8.3 Metabolism <strong>and</strong> urinary excretion <strong>of</strong> carvacrol in rats. (Adapted from Austgulen, L.T. et al., 1987.<br />
Pharmacol. Toxicol., 61: 98–102; Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus von Monterpenen und Sesquiterpenen in<br />
Mensch und Säugetier: Bedeutung für die pharmazeutische Praxis. MPharm. diploma thesis, University <strong>of</strong><br />
Vienna, Austria.)
Metabolism <strong>of</strong> Terpenoids in Animal Models <strong>and</strong> Humans 213<br />
8.2.4 CARVONE<br />
The (R)-(-)- <strong>and</strong> (S)-(+)-enantiomers <strong>of</strong> monoterpene ketone carvone are found in various plants.<br />
While (S)-(+)-carvone is the main constituent <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> caraway (Carum carvi), the oil<br />
<strong>of</strong> spearmint leaves (Mentha spicata var. crispa) contains about 50% <strong>of</strong> (R)-(-)-carvone besides<br />
other terpenes (Wichtel, 2002). Both enantiomers are not only different in odor <strong>and</strong> taste, but they<br />
also have different use in the food, fragrance, <strong>and</strong> pharmaceutical industries. Because <strong>of</strong> minty odor<br />
<strong>and</strong> taste, large amounts <strong>of</strong> (R)-(-)-carvone are frequently added to toothpastes, mouth washes, <strong>and</strong><br />
chewing gums. (S)-(+)-carvone possesses the typical caraway aroma <strong>and</strong> is therefore mainly used<br />
as a taste enhancer in the food <strong>and</strong> fragrance industry. Due to its spasmolytic effect, (S)-(+)-carvone<br />
is also used as stomachic <strong>and</strong> carminative in many pharmaceutical formulations. Furthermore, in<br />
combination with other essential oils, (S)-(+)- <strong>and</strong> (R)-(-)-carvone are applied in aromatherapy<br />
massage treatments for nervous tension <strong>and</strong> several skin disorders (Jäger et al., 2001). After separate<br />
topical applications <strong>of</strong> (R)-(-)- <strong>and</strong> (S)-(+)-carvone, both enantiomers are rapidly absorbed resulting<br />
in significantly higher maximal plasma concentrations (C max ) <strong>and</strong> areas under the blood concentrations<br />
time curves (AUC) for (S)-(+)- compared to (R)-(-)-carvone (88.0 versus 23.9 ng/mL plasma<br />
<strong>and</strong> 5420 versus 1611 ng/mL min, respectively). As demonstrated in Figure 8.4, analysis <strong>of</strong> control<strong>and</strong><br />
ß-glucuronidase pretreated urine samples only revealed stereoselective metabolism <strong>of</strong><br />
(R)-(-)-carvone but not <strong>of</strong> (S)-(+)-carvone to (4R,6S)-(-)-carveol <strong>and</strong> (4R,6S)-(-)-carveol<br />
glucuronide indicating that stereoselectivity in Phases I <strong>and</strong> II metabolism has significant effects on<br />
(R)-(-)- <strong>and</strong> (S)-(+)-carvone pharmacokinetics (Jäger et al., 2000) (Figure 8.4).<br />
The metabolites in plasma for both enantiomers in plasma were below detection limit. Contrary<br />
to the study <strong>of</strong> Jäger et al. (2000), however, a recent study <strong>of</strong> Engel could not demonstrate any differences<br />
in the formation <strong>of</strong> metabolites after peroral application <strong>of</strong> (R)-(-)- <strong>and</strong> (S)-(+)-carvone<br />
(1 mg/kg body weight) to human volunteers. This may be due to the separation <strong>of</strong> biotransformation<br />
products on a nonchiral gas chromatography column. As shown in Figure 8.5, besides carveol, also<br />
dihydrocarveol, carvonic acid (possibly via 10-hydroxycarvone formation), dihydrocarvonic acid,<br />
<strong>and</strong> uroterpenolone could be identified in the urine samples (Engel, 2001).<br />
8.2.5 1,4-CINEOLE<br />
1,4-Cineole, a monoterpene cyclic ether, is known to be a major flavor constituent <strong>of</strong> lime (Citrus<br />
aurantiifolia) <strong>and</strong> Eucalyptus polybractea has been used for many years as a fragrance <strong>and</strong> flavoring<br />
agent (Miyazawa et al., 2001a). Although there are no in vivo data about the metabolism <strong>of</strong><br />
1,4- cineole in humans, recent in vitro <strong>and</strong> in vivo animal studies demonstrated extensive biotransformation<br />
<strong>of</strong> this monoterpene strongly suggesting biotransformation in the human body too. After<br />
oral application to rabbits, four neutral <strong>and</strong> one acidic metabolite could be isolated from urine<br />
namely 9-hydroxy-1,4-cineole, 3,8-dihydroxy-1,4-cineole, 8,9-dihydroxy-1,4-cineole, 1,4-cineole-8-<br />
en-9-ol, <strong>and</strong> 1,4-cineole-9-carboxylic acid (Asakawa et al., 1988). Using rat <strong>and</strong> human liver<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O-glu<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
L-Carvone 4L,6D-Carveol 4L,6D-Carveol-glucuronic acid<br />
FIGURE 8.4 Metabolic pathway <strong>of</strong> (R)-(-)-carvone in healthy subjects. (Adapted from Jäger, W. et al., 2000.<br />
J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 52: 191–197; Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus von Monterpenen und Sesquiterpenen<br />
in Mensch und Säugetier: Bedeutung für die pharmazeutische Praxis. MPharm. diploma thesis, University <strong>of</strong><br />
Vienna, Austria.).
214 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
Dihydrocarveol<br />
Carveol<br />
Human<br />
in vivo<br />
Human<br />
in vivo<br />
Carveol-glucuronid<br />
O<br />
Human<br />
in vivo<br />
O<br />
Human<br />
in vivo<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
10-Hydroxycarvone<br />
Carvone<br />
Human<br />
in vivo<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
Uroterpenolone<br />
Human<br />
in vivo<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
Carvonic acid<br />
OH<br />
Dihydrocarvonic acid<br />
FIGURE 8.5 Proposed metabolic pathway <strong>of</strong> (R)-(-)- <strong>and</strong> (S)-(+)-carvone in healthy volunteers. (Adapted<br />
from Engel, W., 2001. J. Agric. Food Chem., 49: 4069–4075; Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus von<br />
Monterpenen und Sesquiterpenen in Mensch und Säugetier: Bedeutung für die pharmazeutische Praxis.<br />
MPharm. diploma thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Austria.)<br />
microsomes, however, only 1,4-cineole 2 hydroxylation could be observed indicating species-related<br />
differences in 1,4-cineole metabolism (Miyazawa et al., 2001a) (Figure 8.6).<br />
8.2.6 1,8-CINEOLE<br />
1,8-Cineole, a monoterpene cyclic ether which is also named eucalyptol, is widely distributed in<br />
plants <strong>and</strong> is found in high concentrations in the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus polybractea. It is extensively<br />
used in cosmetics, for cough treatment, muscular pain, neurosis, rheumatism, asthma, <strong>and</strong><br />
urinary stones (Wichtel, 2002). Using rat liver microsomes, 1,8-cineole is predominantly converted<br />
to 3-hydroxy-1,8-cineole, followed by 2- <strong>and</strong> then 9-hydroxycineole (Miyazawa et al., 2001b). As<br />
seen in Figure 8.7, in human liver microsomes, however, only the 2-hydroxy- <strong>and</strong> 3-hydroxy products
Metabolism <strong>of</strong> Terpenoids in Animal Models <strong>and</strong> Humans 215<br />
Rabbit<br />
in vivo<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
3,8-Dihydroxy-1,4-cineole<br />
O<br />
1,4-Cineole<br />
Human, rat<br />
in vitro<br />
O<br />
Rabbit<br />
in vivo<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
9-Hydroxy-1,4-cineole<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
8,9-Dihydroxy-1,4-cineole<br />
O<br />
COOH<br />
1,4-Cineole-9-carboxylic acid<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
1,4-Cineole-8-en-9-ol<br />
2-exo-Hydroxy-1,4-cineole<br />
FIGURE 8.6 Proposed metabolism <strong>of</strong> 1,4-cineole in rabbits <strong>and</strong> in rat <strong>and</strong> human liver microsomes.<br />
(Adapted from Asakawa, Y., M. Toyota, <strong>and</strong> T. Ishida, 1988. Xenobiotica, 18: 1129–1134; Miyazawa, M. et al.,<br />
2001a. Xenobiotica, 31: 713–723; Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus von Monterpenen und Sesquiterpenen<br />
in Mensch und Säugetier: Bedeutung für die pharmazeutische Praxis. MPharm. diploma thesis, University <strong>of</strong><br />
Vienna, Austria.)<br />
Human<br />
O<br />
Human<br />
O<br />
in vivo/vitro<br />
in vivo/in vitro<br />
HO<br />
Rat<br />
Rat<br />
HO<br />
in vitro<br />
in vitro<br />
2-Hydroxy-1,8-cineole 1,8-Cineole 3-Hydroxy-1,8-cineole<br />
Rat<br />
in vitro<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
O<br />
9-Hydroxy-1,8-cineole<br />
FIGURE 8.7 Proposed metabolism <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole in vitro (rat <strong>and</strong> human liver microsomes) <strong>and</strong> in vivo<br />
(rabbits <strong>and</strong> humans). (Adapted from Miyazawa, M. et al., 2001b. Drug Metab. Dispos., 29: 200–205; Jahrmann,<br />
R., 2007. Metabolismus von Monterpenen und Sesquiterpenen in Mensch und Säugetier: Bedeutung für die<br />
pharmazeutische Praxis. MPharm. diploma thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Austria.)
216 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
catalyzed by the isoenzmye CYP3A4 were seen (Miyazawa et al., 2001b). Both metabolites could<br />
also be identified in the urine <strong>of</strong> three human volunteers after oral administration <strong>of</strong> a cold medication<br />
containing 1,8-cineole (Miyazawa et al., 2001b). Both metabolites can therefore be used as<br />
urinary markers for the intake <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole in humans.<br />
8.2.7 CITRAL<br />
Both natural <strong>and</strong> synthetic citral are composed <strong>of</strong> an isomeric mixture <strong>of</strong> geranial (E-3,7-dimethyl-<br />
2,6-octadienal) <strong>and</strong> neral (Z-3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadienal). In the isomeric mixtures, geranial is<br />
usually the predominant isomer. It occurs naturally in essential oils <strong>of</strong> citrus fruits (i.e., up to 5%<br />
in lemon oil) <strong>and</strong> in a variety <strong>of</strong> herbs <strong>and</strong> plants such as Melissa <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis, lemongrass (70–80%),<br />
<strong>and</strong> eucalyptus (Wichtel, 2002). Because <strong>of</strong> its intense lemon aroma <strong>and</strong> flavor, citral has been<br />
used extensively in the food, cosmetic, <strong>and</strong> detergent industries since the early 1900s (Boyer <strong>and</strong><br />
Petersen, 1991). Studies in rats have shown that citral is rapidly metabolized to several acids <strong>and</strong><br />
a biliary glucuronide <strong>and</strong> excreted, with urine (48–63%) as the major route <strong>of</strong> elimination <strong>of</strong><br />
citral, followed by expired air (8–17%), <strong>and</strong> feces (7–16%). As demonstrated in Figure 8.8, seven<br />
urinary metabolites were isolated <strong>and</strong> identified: 3-hydroxy-3,7-dimethyl-6-octenedioic acid,<br />
CHO<br />
CHO<br />
Rat<br />
in vivo<br />
CHO<br />
CHO<br />
CHO<br />
CHO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
(E) (Z) (E) (Z)<br />
(E)<br />
CHO<br />
(Z)<br />
CHO<br />
Citral<br />
Rat<br />
in vivo<br />
8-Hydroxy-3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadienal<br />
3,7-Dimethyl-2,6-octadienedial<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
(E)<br />
(Z)<br />
E-3,8-Dimethyl-2,6-octadienedioic acid<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
(E)<br />
(Z)<br />
3,7-Dimethyl-2,6-octadienedioic acid<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
(E)<br />
(Z)<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
(E)<br />
COOH<br />
(Z)<br />
3,8-Dihydroxy-3,7-dimethyl-6-octenoic<br />
acid<br />
3-Hydroxy-3,7-dimethyl-6-octenedioic<br />
acid<br />
3,7-Dimethyl-6-octenedioic<br />
acid<br />
FIGURE 8.8 Proposed metabolism <strong>of</strong> citral in rats. (Adapted from Diliberto, J.J. et al., 1990. Drug Metab.<br />
Dispos., 18: 886–875; Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus von Monterpenen und Sesquiterpenen in Mensch und<br />
Säugetier: Bedeutung für die pharmazeutische Praxis. MPharm. diploma thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Austria.)
Metabolism <strong>of</strong> Terpenoids in Animal Models <strong>and</strong> Humans 217<br />
3,8-dihydroxy-3,7-dimethyl-6-octenedioic acid 3,9-dihydroxy-3,7-dimethyl-6-octenedioic acid,<br />
E- <strong>and</strong> Z-3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octenedioic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-6-octenedioic acid, <strong>and</strong> E-3,7-dimethyl-<br />
2,6-octenedioic acid (Diliberto et al., 1990). There currently are not any in vitro or in vivo data<br />
available about the metabolism <strong>of</strong> citral in humans. However, based on the rat study mentioned<br />
above, extensive biotransformation <strong>of</strong> citral is highly suggested.<br />
8.2.8 CITRONELLAL<br />
Citronellal is a monocyclic monoterpene with highest concentrations in the essential oil <strong>of</strong><br />
Melissa <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis (1–20%). Although citronellal is not commonly used in food <strong>and</strong> flavor industry,<br />
it is a main constituent in many pharmaceutical preparations as a mild sedative or stomachicum<br />
(Wichtel, 2002). Although extensively used in patients, data about its metabolism are scarce. Only<br />
one study described biotransformation <strong>of</strong> citronellal in rabbits. Ishida et al. could isolate three<br />
neutral metabolites <strong>of</strong> (+)-citronellal in the urine <strong>of</strong> rabbits namely (-)-trans-menthane-3,8-diol,<br />
(+)-cis menthane-3,8-diol, <strong>and</strong> (-)-isopulegol (Figure 8.9). An additional acidic metabolite (6E)-3,<br />
7-dimethyl-6-octene-1,8-dioic acid was formed as the result <strong>of</strong> regioselective oxidation <strong>of</strong> the aldehyde<br />
<strong>and</strong> dimethyl allyl groups (Ishida et al., 1989). Based on animal data, metabolism <strong>of</strong> citronellal<br />
is also expected in humans.<br />
8.2.9 FENCHONE<br />
Fenchone, a bicyclic monoterpene, is widely distributed in plants with highest concentrations in the<br />
essential oil <strong>of</strong> Foeniculum vulgare. Fenchone has camphoraceous fragrance <strong>and</strong> is used as a food<br />
flavor <strong>and</strong> in perfumes (Wichtel, 2002). A recent study (Miyazawa <strong>and</strong> Gyoubu, 2006) investigated<br />
the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> fenchone in human liver microsomes demonstrating the formation <strong>of</strong> 6-exohydroxyfenchone,<br />
6-endo-hydroxyfenchone, <strong>and</strong> 10-hydroxyfenchone (Figure 8.10). There currently<br />
are not any data about metabolism <strong>of</strong> this compound in human volunteers. However, based on the<br />
CHO<br />
(+) Citronellal<br />
Rabbit (urine <strong>and</strong> gastric juice)<br />
CO 2 H<br />
OH<br />
+ + +<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
CO 2 H<br />
(–)-trans-menthane-3,8-diol (+)-cis-Menthane-3,8-diol (–)-Isopulegone (6E)-3,7-Dimetyl-6-octene-1,8-dioic acid<br />
FIGURE 8.9 Proposed metabolism <strong>of</strong> citronellal in rabbits. (Adapted from Ishida, T. et al., 1989. Xenobiotica,<br />
19: 843–855; Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus von Monterpenen und Sesquiterpenen in Mensch und Säugetier:<br />
Bedeutung für die pharmazeutische Praxis. MPharm. diploma thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Austria.)
218 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Human<br />
in vivo<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
O<br />
+<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
Human<br />
in vivo<br />
6-exo-Hydroxyfenchone<br />
6-endo-Hydroxyfenchone<br />
O<br />
(+)-Fenchone<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
10-Hydroxyfenchone<br />
FIGURE 8.10 Proposed metabolism <strong>of</strong> fenchone in human liver microsomes. (Adapted from Miyazawa, M.<br />
<strong>and</strong> K. Gyoubu, 2006. Biol. Pharm. Bull., 29: 2354–2358; Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus von Monterpenen<br />
und Sesquiterpenen in Mensch und Säugetier: Bedeutung für die pharmazeutische Praxis. MPharm. diploma<br />
thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Austria.)<br />
in vitro experiments using human liver microsomes, identical biotransformation products should also<br />
be found in blood or urine samples <strong>of</strong> humans after dietary intake <strong>of</strong> fenchone-containing products.<br />
8.2.10 GERANIOL<br />
Geraniol is a monoterpene alcohol with pronounced concentrations in the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Cymbopogon<br />
winteranus Jowitt (12–25%). It is also found in small quantities in rose, palmarosa, citronella, geranium,<br />
lemon, <strong>and</strong> many other essential oils. It has a rose-like odor <strong>and</strong> is commonly used in perfumes<br />
<strong>and</strong> in the flavor industry (Chadha <strong>and</strong> Madyastha, 1984). In a study <strong>of</strong> Chadha <strong>and</strong> Madyastha,<br />
several metabolites could be identified in rat urine after oral administration (Chadha <strong>and</strong> Madyastha,<br />
1984). Geraniol can be either metabolized to 8-hydroxygeraniol <strong>and</strong> via 8-carboxygeraniol to 3,7-<br />
dimethyl-2,6-octenedioic acid (Hildebr<strong>and</strong>t’s acid) or directly oxidized to geranic acid <strong>and</strong> 3-<br />
hydroxycitronelic acid (Figure 8.11). Formation <strong>of</strong> 8-hydroxygeraniol <strong>and</strong> 8-carboxygeraniol are due<br />
to selective oxidation <strong>of</strong> the C-8 in geraniol. The 8-hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> geraniol also occurs in higher<br />
plants where it is the first step in the biosynthesis <strong>of</strong> indole alkaloids.<br />
8.2.11 LIMONENE<br />
The monocyclic monoterpene (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-limonene enantiomers have been shown to be present in<br />
orange peel (Citrus aurantium L. sp. aurantium) <strong>and</strong> other plants <strong>and</strong> are extensively used as fragrances<br />
in household products <strong>and</strong> components <strong>of</strong> artificial essential oils. The (+)-limonene isomeric<br />
form is more abundantly present in plants than the racemic mixture <strong>and</strong> the (-)-limonene isomeric<br />
form (Wichtel, 2002). It has previously been shown that (+) limonene has chemopreventive activities<br />
in experimental animal models including rats <strong>and</strong> mice (Crowell et al., 1992). Because <strong>of</strong> the greater<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> (+)-limonene in the food <strong>and</strong> fragrance industry, only its metabolism <strong>and</strong> not that <strong>of</strong><br />
(-)-limonene is described below. Several research groups have successfully described the biotransformation<br />
<strong>of</strong> (+)-limonene in vitro (rat <strong>and</strong> human liver microsomes) <strong>and</strong> in vivo (rat, mice, guinea
Metabolism <strong>of</strong> Terpenoids in Animal Models <strong>and</strong> Humans 219<br />
OH<br />
Rat<br />
in vivo<br />
Rat<br />
in vivo<br />
OH<br />
Rabbit<br />
in vitro<br />
Geraniol<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
8-Hydroxygeraniol<br />
Geranic acid<br />
Rat<br />
in vivo<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
8-Carboxygeraniol<br />
Hildebr<strong>and</strong>t’s acid<br />
3-Hydroxycitronelic acid<br />
FIGURE 8.11 Proposed metabolism <strong>of</strong> geraniol in rats. (Adapted from Chadha, A. <strong>and</strong> M.K. Madyastha,<br />
1984. Xenobiotica, 14: 365–374; Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus von Monterpenen und Sesquiterpenen in<br />
Mensch und Säugetier: Bedeutung für die pharmazeutische Praxis. MPharm. diploma thesis, University <strong>of</strong><br />
Vienna, Austria.)<br />
pigs, dogs, rabbits, human volunteers, <strong>and</strong> patients). As shown in Figure 8.12, (+)-limonene is<br />
extensively biotransformed to several metabolites whereas in humans the main biotransformation<br />
products are perillyl alcohol; perillic acid; p-mentha-1,8-dien-carboxylic acid (an isomer <strong>of</strong> perillic<br />
acid); cis-dihydroperillic acid; trans-dihydroperillic acid; limonene; 1,2-diol; limonene-10-ol;<br />
limonene-8,9-diol; several glucuronides <strong>of</strong> perillic acid; dihydroperillic acid; <strong>and</strong> limonene-10-ol<br />
(Crowell et al., 1992; Miyazawa et al., 2002; Shimada et al., 2002).<br />
8.2.12 LINALOOL<br />
Linalool can be obtained naturally by fractional distillation <strong>and</strong> subsequent rectification from oils <strong>of</strong><br />
the Cajenne rosewood, Brazil rosewood, Mexican linaloe, <strong>and</strong> cori<strong>and</strong>er seed. The far highest concentration<br />
<strong>of</strong> linalool is found in the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Ocimum basilicum (up to 75%). Pure linalool possesses<br />
a fresh, clean, mild, light floral odor with a slight citrus impression <strong>and</strong> is used in large quantities<br />
in soap <strong>and</strong> detergent products (Wichtel, 2002). Although linalool is used in large quantities in the<br />
fragrance industry, there are no data available about its biotransformation in humans. In rat, however,<br />
linalool is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes to dihydrolinalool <strong>and</strong> tetrahydrolinalool<br />
<strong>and</strong> to 8-hydroxylinalool, which is further oxidized to 8-carboxylinalool (Figure 8.13). CYPderived<br />
metabolites are then converted to glucuronide conjugates (Chadha <strong>and</strong> Madyastha, 1984).
220 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
CH 2 OH<br />
HO<br />
Rabbit, O<br />
guinea pig, dog<br />
in vitro<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
Perillyl alcohol<br />
trans-Carveol<br />
Carvone<br />
Limonene-1,2-diol<br />
Human, rabbit,<br />
guinea pig, dog<br />
in vitro<br />
Human, rabbit,<br />
guinea pig, dog<br />
in vitro<br />
Human<br />
in vivo<br />
Rat<br />
in vitro<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
Human<br />
in vivo<br />
1,2-Glycol<br />
1,2-Epoxid<br />
Rat<br />
in vitro<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
Human<br />
in vivo<br />
Limonene-8,9-diol<br />
(Uroterpenol)<br />
Rat<br />
in vitro<br />
OH<br />
O-Glu<br />
Limonene-8,9-diolglucuronide<br />
OH OH<br />
8,9-Glycol<br />
O<br />
8,9-Epoxid<br />
Human<br />
in vivo<br />
Rat<br />
in vitro<br />
Rat<br />
in vitro<br />
Human, rat<br />
in vivo<br />
D-Limonene<br />
Rat<br />
in vitro<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
Human<br />
in vivo<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
Limonene-10-ol<br />
Human<br />
in vivo<br />
COO-Glu<br />
O-Glu<br />
Limonene-10-olglucuronide<br />
HOOC<br />
Isomer <strong>of</strong> perillic acid<br />
(p-Mentha-1,8-dien-carboxylic acid)<br />
Perillyl alcohol<br />
Perillic acid<br />
Human, rat<br />
in vivo<br />
Rat<br />
in vitro<br />
Perillic acid-glucuronide<br />
COO-Glu<br />
+<br />
COO-Glu<br />
Human<br />
in vivo<br />
COOH<br />
+<br />
COOH<br />
cis-Dihydroperillic acidglucuronide<br />
trans-Dihydroperillic acidglucuronide<br />
cis-Dihydroperillic acid<br />
trans-Dihydroperillic acid<br />
FIGURE 8.12 Proposed metabolism <strong>of</strong> (+)-limonene in rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, dogs, <strong>and</strong> humans.<br />
(Adapted from Crowell, P.L. et al., 1992. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 31: 205–212; Miyazawa, M. et al.,<br />
2002. Drug Metab. Dispos., 30: 602–607; Shimada, T. et al., 2002. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinetics, 17:<br />
507–515; Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus von Monterpenen und Sesquiterpenen in Mensch und Säugetier:<br />
Bedeutung für die pharmazeutische Praxis. MPharm. diploma thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Austria.)
Metabolism <strong>of</strong> Terpenoids in Animal Models <strong>and</strong> Humans 221<br />
O-Glu<br />
Linalool-glucuronic acid<br />
Rat<br />
in vivo<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
Rat<br />
in vivo<br />
OH<br />
Rat<br />
in vivo<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
8-Carboxylinalool 8-Hydroxylinalool<br />
Linalool<br />
Dihydrolinalool Tetrahydrolinalool<br />
FIGURE 8.13 Proposed metabolism <strong>of</strong> linalool in rats. (Adapted from Chadha, A. <strong>and</strong> M.K. Madyastha,<br />
1984. Xenobiotica, 14: 365–374; Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus von Monterpenen und Sesquiterpenen<br />
in Mensch und Säugetier: Bedeutung für die pharmazeutische Praxis. MPharm. diploma thesis, University <strong>of</strong><br />
Vienna, Austria.)<br />
8.2.13 LINALYL ACETATE<br />
Linalyl acetate is a fragrance ingredient used in many fragrance compounds. It may be found in<br />
fragrances used in decorative cosmetics, fine fragrances, shampoos, <strong>and</strong> toilet soaps, as well as in<br />
noncosmetic products such as household cleaners <strong>and</strong> detergents.<br />
Linalyl acetate can be found in many plants, however, it is in the highest concentration in the essential<br />
oil <strong>of</strong> Citrus aurantium spp. aurantium (Wichtel, 2002). As an ester, linalyl acetate is hydrolyzed<br />
in vivo by carboxylesterases or esterases to linalool (Figure 8.14), which is then further metabolized<br />
to numerous oxidized biotransformation products (see metabolism <strong>of</strong> linalool) (Bickers et al., 2003).<br />
8.2.14 MENTHOL<br />
Menthol is a major component <strong>of</strong> various mint oils. The plant oil, <strong>of</strong>ten referred to as peppermint oil<br />
(from Mentha piperita) or cornmint oil (from Mentha arvensis), is readily extracted from the plant<br />
by steam distillation (Wichtel, 2002). It has a pleasant typical minty odor <strong>and</strong> taste, <strong>and</strong> is widely<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
Rat<br />
in vitro<br />
Linalyl acetate<br />
Linalool<br />
FIGURE 8.14 Proposed metabolism <strong>of</strong> linalyl acetate in rats. (Adapted from Bickers, D. et al., 2003. Food<br />
Chem. Toxicol., 41: 919–942; Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus von Monterpenen und Sesquiterpenen in<br />
Mensch und Säugetier: Bedeutung für die pharmazeutische Praxis. MPharm. diploma thesis, University <strong>of</strong><br />
Vienna, Austria.)
222 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
used to flavor foods <strong>and</strong> oral pharmaceutical preparations ranging from common cold medications<br />
to toothpastes (Mühlbauer et al., 2003). After oral administration to human volunteers, menthol is<br />
rapidly metabolized <strong>and</strong> only menthol glucuronide could be measured in plasma or urine.<br />
Interestingly, unconjugated menthol was only detected after a transdermal application. In rats, however,<br />
hydroxylation at the C-7 methyl group <strong>and</strong> at C-8 <strong>and</strong> C-9 <strong>of</strong> the isopropyl moiety form a series<br />
a mono- <strong>and</strong> dihydroxymenthols <strong>and</strong> carboxylic acids, some <strong>of</strong> which are excreted in part as<br />
glucuronic acid conjugates. Additional metabolites are mono- <strong>and</strong> or dihydroxylated menthol derivatives<br />
(Figure 8.15). Similar to humans, the main metabolite in rats was again menthol glucuronide<br />
(Madyastha <strong>and</strong> Srivatsan, 1988b; Gelal et al., 1999; Spichinger et al., 2004).<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
3-Hydroxy-p-menthane-9-carboxylic<br />
acid<br />
Rat<br />
in vivo<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
p-Menthane-3,9-diol<br />
Human/rat<br />
in vivo<br />
Glucuronide<br />
Rat<br />
in vitro/in vivo<br />
Rat<br />
in vitro/in vivo<br />
Menthol<br />
Rat<br />
in vivo<br />
Glucuronide<br />
OH<br />
p-Menthane-3,7-diol<br />
Rat<br />
in vivo<br />
Rat<br />
in vitro/vivo<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
p-Menthane-3,8-diol<br />
Rat<br />
in vivo<br />
3-Hydroxy-p-menthane-7-carboxylic<br />
acid<br />
Rat<br />
in vivo<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
3,8-Dihydroxy-7-carboxylic<br />
acid<br />
OH<br />
p-Menthane-3,7,8-triol<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
3,8-Dihydroxy-p-menthane-7-carboxylic acid<br />
3,8-Oxy-p-menthane-7-carboxylic acid<br />
FIGURE 8.15 Proposed metabolism <strong>of</strong> menthol in rats <strong>and</strong> humans. (Adapted from Madyastha, K.M. <strong>and</strong><br />
V. Srivatsan, 1988a. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 41: 17–25; Gelal, A. et al., 1999. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 66:<br />
128–235; Spichinger, M. et al., 2004. J. Chromatogr. B, 799: 111–117; Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus<br />
von Monterpenen und Sesquiterpenen in Mensch und Säugetier: Bedeutung für die pharmazeutische Praxis.<br />
MPharm. diploma thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Austria.)
Metabolism <strong>of</strong> Terpenoids in Animal Models <strong>and</strong> Humans 223<br />
8.2.15 MYRCENE<br />
Myrcene is the major constituent <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> hop (Humulus lupulus), which is used in the<br />
manufacture <strong>of</strong> alcoholic beverages. Hop is also frequently used in many pharmaceutical preparations<br />
as a mild sedative in the treatment <strong>of</strong> insomnia (Wichtel, 2002). After oral application, Ishida<br />
<strong>and</strong> coworkers could identify several metabolites in the urine <strong>of</strong> rabbits whereby the formation <strong>of</strong><br />
the two glycols may be due to the hydration <strong>of</strong> the corresponding epoxides formed as intermediates<br />
(Ishida et al., 1981). The formation <strong>of</strong> uroterpenol may proceed through limonene, which was clearly<br />
derived from myrcene in the acidic conditions <strong>of</strong> rabbit stomachs (Figure 8.16).<br />
8.2.16 PINENE<br />
There are two structural is<strong>of</strong>orms found in nature: a- <strong>and</strong> b-pinene. As the name suggests, both is<strong>of</strong>orms<br />
are important constituents <strong>of</strong> pine resin. Interestingly, a-pinene is more common in European<br />
pines, whereas b-pinene is more common in North America. They are also found in the resin <strong>of</strong> many<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
Rabbit<br />
in vivo<br />
Myrcene-3(10)-glycol<br />
3-Hydroxymyrcene-10-carboxylic acid<br />
O<br />
Rabbit<br />
in vivo<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
Myrcene<br />
Myrcene-1,2-glycol<br />
2-Hydroxymyrcene-1-carboxylic acid<br />
Rabbit<br />
in vivo<br />
OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
Limonene<br />
Uroterpenol<br />
FIGURE 8.16 Proposed metabolism <strong>of</strong> myrcene in rabbits. (Adapted from Ishida, T. et al., 1981. J. Pharm.<br />
Sci., 70: 406–415; Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus von Monterpenen und Sesquiterpenen in Mensch und<br />
Säugetier: Bedeutung für die pharmazeutische Praxis. MPharm. diploma thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Austria.)
224 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
other conifers, <strong>and</strong> more widely in many plants. One <strong>of</strong> the highest concentrations <strong>of</strong> a- <strong>and</strong> b-pinene<br />
is in the essential oil <strong>of</strong> the fruit <strong>of</strong> juniper (Juniperis communis) with a total content <strong>of</strong> over 80% <strong>of</strong><br />
these is<strong>of</strong>orms. Furthermore, a-pinene is also found in the essential oil <strong>of</strong> rosemary (Rosmarinus<br />
<strong>of</strong>fi cinalis) <strong>and</strong> the racemic mixture in eucalyptus oil. In the industry, a- <strong>and</strong> b-pinene are used in the<br />
production <strong>of</strong> alcoholic beverages like gin (Wichtel, 2002). As shown in Figure 8.17, metabolism <strong>of</strong><br />
CH 2 OH<br />
COOH<br />
Rabbit<br />
in vivo<br />
+<br />
Rabbit<br />
in vivo<br />
OH<br />
α-Pinene<br />
trans-Verbenol<br />
Myrtenol<br />
Myrtenic acid<br />
Human<br />
in vivo<br />
Human<br />
in vivo<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
OH<br />
cis-Verbenol<br />
trans-Pinocarveol<br />
10-Pinanol<br />
Human<br />
in vivo<br />
Rabbit<br />
in vivo<br />
Rabbit<br />
in vivo<br />
O<br />
β-Pinene<br />
Rabbit<br />
in vivo<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
OH<br />
α-Terpineol<br />
FIGURE 8.17 Proposed metabolism <strong>of</strong> a- <strong>and</strong> b-pinene in rabbits <strong>and</strong> humans. (Adapted from Ishida, T.<br />
et al., 1981. J. Pharm. Sci., 70: 406–415; Eriksson, K. <strong>and</strong> J.O. Levin, 1996. J. Chromatogr. B, 677: 85–98;<br />
Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus von Monterpenen und Sesquiterpenen in Mensch und Säugetier: Bedeutung<br />
für die pharmazeutische Praxis. MPharm. diploma thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Austria.)<br />
OH<br />
1-p-Menthene-7,8-diol
Metabolism <strong>of</strong> Terpenoids in Animal Models <strong>and</strong> Humans 225<br />
a- <strong>and</strong> b-pinene in humans leads to the formation <strong>of</strong> trans- <strong>and</strong> cis- verbenol, respectively. Recent<br />
data analyzing the human urine after occupational exposure <strong>of</strong> sawing fumes also suggest that cis<strong>and</strong><br />
trans-verbenol are being further hydroxylated to diols. The main urinary metabolite <strong>of</strong> a-pinene<br />
in rabbits is trans-verbenol; the minor biotransformation products are myrtenol <strong>and</strong> myrtenic acid.<br />
The main urinary metabolites <strong>of</strong> b-pinene, in rabbits, however, is cis-verbenol indicating stereoselective<br />
hydroxylation (Ishida et al., 1981; Eriksson <strong>and</strong> Levin, 1996).<br />
8.2.17 PULEGONE<br />
(R)-(+)-Pulegone is a monoterpene ketone present in essential oils from many mint species. Two<br />
mints, Hedeoma pulegoides <strong>and</strong> Mentha pulegium, both commonly called pennyroyal, contain<br />
essential oils, which are chiefly, pulegone (Madyastha <strong>and</strong> Raj, 1992). (S)-(-) Pulegone is found<br />
rarely in essential oil. Pennyroyal oil has been used as a flavoring agent in food <strong>and</strong> beverages, as<br />
well as a component in fragrance products <strong>and</strong> flea repellents. Pennyroyal herb has also been used<br />
for the purpose <strong>of</strong> inducing menstruation <strong>and</strong> abortion. In higher doses, however, penny royal oil<br />
may have resulted in central nervous system toxicity, gastritis, hepatic <strong>and</strong> renal failure, pulmonary<br />
toxicity, <strong>and</strong> death. The content <strong>of</strong> pulegone was found to be greater than 80% <strong>of</strong> the terpenes<br />
in pennyroyal oils that were obtained from health food stores, <strong>and</strong> was found to be both<br />
hepatotoxic <strong>and</strong> pneumotoxic in mice (Engel, 2003). Based on the observed toxicity in animal<br />
models <strong>and</strong> humans, several studies were performed in order to investigate the metabolism <strong>of</strong><br />
(R)-(+)-pulegone. At nontoxic concentrations, pulegone is oxidized selectively at the 10-position,<br />
forming 10-hydroxypulegone. Alternatively, it may be reduced to menthone, which has been<br />
detected in trace levels in urine samples. It might be possible that pulegone is also reduced at the<br />
carbonyl group first; however, no trace <strong>of</strong> pulegol was found in the urine samples. Consequently,<br />
pulegol is either reduced very efficiently to menthol or rearranged to 3-p-menthen-8-ol (Engel,<br />
2003) (Figure 8.18).<br />
8.2.18 α-TERPINEOL<br />
a-Terpineol, a monocyclic monoterpene tertiary alcohol, which has been isolated from a variety <strong>of</strong><br />
a-terpineol, was found in the essential sources such as cajuput oil, pine oil, <strong>and</strong> petit grain oil. But<br />
the far highest concentration (up to 30%) <strong>of</strong> a-terpineol was found in the essential oil <strong>of</strong> the tee tree<br />
(Melaleuca alternifolia). Based on its pleasant odor similar to lilac, a-terpineol is widely used in the<br />
manufacture <strong>of</strong> perfumes, cosmetics, soaps, <strong>and</strong> antiseptic agents (Madyastha <strong>and</strong> Srivatsan, 1988a;<br />
Wichtel, 2002). After oral administration to rats (600 mg/kg body weight), a-terpineol is metabolized<br />
to p-menthane-1,2,8-triol probably formed from the epoxide intermediate. Notably, allylic<br />
methyl oxidation <strong>and</strong> the reduction <strong>of</strong> the 1,2-double bound are the major routes for the biotransformation<br />
<strong>of</strong> a-terpineol in rat (Figure 8.19). Although allylic oxidation <strong>of</strong> C-1 methyl seems to be the<br />
major pathway, the alcohol p-ment-1-ene-7,8-diol could not be isolated from the urine samples.<br />
Probably, this compound is accumulated <strong>and</strong> is readily further oxidized to oleuropeic acid<br />
(Madyastha <strong>and</strong> Srivatsan, 1988a).<br />
8.2.19 α- AND β-THUJONE<br />
a-Thujone <strong>and</strong> b-thujone are bicyclic monoterpenes that differ in the stereochemistry <strong>of</strong> the C-4<br />
methyl group. The isomer ratio depends on the plant source, with high content <strong>of</strong> a-thujone in cedar<br />
leaf oil <strong>and</strong> b-thujone in wormwood oil. They are also common constituents in herbal medicines,<br />
essential oils, foods, flavorings, <strong>and</strong> beverages. a-Thujone is perhaps best known as the active<br />
ingredient <strong>of</strong> the alcoholic beverage absinthe, which was a very popular European drink in the<br />
1800s (Wichtel, 2002). In vivo rat <strong>and</strong> mouse models conformed to the in vitro data using rat, mice,<br />
<strong>and</strong> human liver microsomes where a- <strong>and</strong> b-thujone are extensively metabolized to six hydroxythujones<br />
<strong>and</strong> three dehydrothujones (Figure 8.20). The dehydro derivatives are possibly formed by
226 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Human<br />
in vivo<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
Pulegone<br />
Human<br />
in vivo<br />
Human<br />
in vivo<br />
OH<br />
10-Hydroxypulegone<br />
Menth<strong>of</strong>uran<br />
OH O O<br />
Pulegol<br />
Menthone<br />
OH<br />
8-Hydroxymenthone<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
3-p-Menthen-8-ol Menthol 1-Hydroxymenthone Piperitone<br />
FIGURE 8.18 Proposed metabolism <strong>of</strong> pulegone in humans. (Adapted from Engel, W., 2003. J. Agric. Food<br />
Chem., 51: 6589–6597; Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus von Monterpenen und Sesquiterpenen in Mensch<br />
und Säugetier: Bedeutung für die pharmazeutische Praxis. MPharm. diploma thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna,<br />
Austria.)<br />
hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> methyl substituents at position 8 or 10 followed by dehydration. In Phase II<br />
reactions, several metabolites are further conjugated with glucuronic acid (Ishida et al., 1989;<br />
Höld et al., 2000, 2001). Based on the in vitro <strong>and</strong> in vivo data, biotransformation should also be<br />
pronounced in humans after the intake <strong>of</strong> a- <strong>and</strong> b-thujone.<br />
8.2.20 THYMOL<br />
Natural sources <strong>of</strong> thymol are the bee balms (Monarda fi stulosa <strong>and</strong> Monarda didyma). Larger<br />
quantities <strong>of</strong> thymol exist in the essential oil <strong>of</strong> thyme (Thymus vulgaris) with concentrations up to<br />
70%. Thymol is the primary ingredient in modern commercial mouthwash formulae as it demonstrates<br />
antiseptic properties. This may explain the use <strong>of</strong> thyme in herbal medicine to treat mouth<br />
<strong>and</strong> throat infections (Wichtel, 2002). It is noteworthy that thymol is also used as flavor additive in<br />
a number <strong>of</strong> foods <strong>and</strong> beverages. Although after oral application to rats, large quantities were<br />
excreted unchanged or as their glucuronide <strong>and</strong> sulfate conjugates; extensive oxidation <strong>of</strong> the methyl<br />
<strong>and</strong> isopropyl groups also occurred (Austgulen et al., 1987). This resulted in the formation <strong>of</strong> derivatives<br />
<strong>of</strong> benzyl alcohol <strong>and</strong> 2-phenylpropanol <strong>and</strong> their corresponding carboxylic acids. Ring<br />
hydroxy lation was only a minor reaction (Figure 8.21).
Metabolism <strong>of</strong> Terpenoids in Animal Models <strong>and</strong> Humans 227<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
Rat<br />
in vitro<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
p-Menthane-1,2,8-triol<br />
OH<br />
Rat<br />
in vitro<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
α-Terpineol<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
p-Menth-1-ene-7,8-diol<br />
Oleuropeic acid<br />
Dihydrooleuropeic acid<br />
FIGURE 8.19 Proposed metabolism <strong>of</strong> a-terpineol in rats. (Adapted from Madyastha, K.M. <strong>and</strong> V. Srivatsan,<br />
1988a. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 41: 17–25; Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus von Monterpenen und<br />
Sesquiterpenen in Mensch und Säugetier: Bedeutung für die pharmazeutische Praxis. MPharm. diploma thesis,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Austria.)<br />
8.3 METABOLISM OF SESQUITERPENES<br />
8.3.1 CARYOPHYLLENE<br />
(-)-b-Caryophyllene is the main sesquiterpene <strong>of</strong> hops <strong>and</strong> is being used as a cosmetic additive in<br />
soaps <strong>and</strong> fragrances (Wichtel, 2002). Storage <strong>of</strong> fresh hops under aerobic conditions leads to rapid<br />
oxidation. The main product <strong>of</strong> this reaction (-)-caryophyllene-5,6-oxide markedly affects the<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> beer. In herbal medicine, (-)-b-caryophyllene is also responsible for the mild sedative<br />
properties <strong>of</strong> hops. Furthermore, it also demonstrates cytotoxicity against breast cancer cells in vitro<br />
(Asakawa et al., 1986; DeBarber et al., 2004). The biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-b-caryophyllene in<br />
rabbits yielded the main metabolite [10S-(-)-14-hydroxycaryophyllene-5,6-oxide] <strong>and</strong> the minor<br />
biotransformation product cayrophyllene-5,6-oxide-2,12-diol. The formation <strong>of</strong> the minor metabolites<br />
is easily explained via the diepoxide intermediate. Thus, it is suggested that regioselective<br />
hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> the epoxide occurred (Asakawa et al., 1981, 1986). Whether (-)-b-caryophyllene<br />
also shows the same metabolic pathway in human is not known yet. However, based on in vivo data<br />
from rabbits, extensive biotransformation in humans is highly suggested after oral administration<br />
(Figure 8.22).<br />
8.3.2 FARNESOL<br />
Farnesol is a natural organic compound, which is a sesquiterpene alcohol present in many essential<br />
oil such as citronella, neroli, cyclamen, lemon grass, rose, <strong>and</strong> musk. Interestingly, it is also produced<br />
in humans where it acts on numerous nuclear receptors <strong>and</strong> has received considerable attention<br />
due to its apparent anticancer properties. It is used in perfumery to emphasize the odors <strong>of</strong><br />
sweet floral perfumes (DeBarber et al., 2004). In vitro studies using recombinant drug metabolizing
228 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Glucuronide Glucuronide Glucuronide<br />
Glucuronide<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
2-Hydroxy-α-thujon<br />
2-Hydroxy-β-thujon 4-Hydroxy-α-thujon 4-Hydroxy-β-thujon<br />
Human, rat, mouse<br />
in vitro<br />
Rat, mouse<br />
in vivo<br />
Human, rat, mouse<br />
in vitro<br />
Rat, mouse<br />
in vivo<br />
Human, rat, mouse<br />
in vitro<br />
Rat, mouse<br />
in vivo<br />
Human, rat, mouse<br />
in vitro<br />
Rat, mouse<br />
in vivo<br />
OH<br />
Rabbit,<br />
in vivo<br />
O<br />
Rat, mouse<br />
in vivo<br />
O<br />
Mouse,<br />
in vitro/ in vivo<br />
Thujol (R)<br />
Neothujol (S)<br />
OH<br />
8-Hydroxy-α-thujon<br />
8-Hydroxy-β-thujon<br />
Human,<br />
rat, mouse<br />
in vitro<br />
α-Thujon<br />
β-Thujon<br />
Rat, mouse<br />
in vivo<br />
Human,<br />
rat, mouse<br />
in vitro<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
Human, rat, mouse<br />
in vitro<br />
Rat, mouse<br />
in vivo<br />
Human, rat, mouse<br />
in vitro<br />
Rat, mouse<br />
in vivo Rat, mouse<br />
in vivo<br />
Human,<br />
rat, mouse<br />
O<br />
in vitro<br />
10-Hydroxy-α-thujon<br />
10-Hydroxy-β-thujon<br />
O<br />
Glucuronide<br />
7,8-Dehydro-α-thujon<br />
7,8-Dehydro-β-thujon<br />
OH<br />
7-Hydroxy-α-thujon<br />
7-Hydroxy-β-thujon<br />
4,10-Dehydro-α-thujon<br />
Sabinon<br />
FIGURE 8.20 Proposed in vitro <strong>and</strong> in vivo metabolism <strong>of</strong> a- <strong>and</strong> b-thujone in rats. (Adapted from Ishida, T.<br />
et al., 1989. Xenobiotica, 19: 843–855; Höld, K.M. et al., 2000. Environ. Chem. Toxicol., 97: 3826–3831; Höld,<br />
K.M. et al., 2001. Chem. Res. Toxicol., 14: 589–595; Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus von Monterpenen<br />
und Sesquiterpenen in Mensch und Säugetier: Bedeutung für die pharmazeutische Praxis. MPharm. diploma<br />
thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Austria.)
Metabolism <strong>of</strong> Terpenoids in Animal Models <strong>and</strong> Humans 229<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
2,5-Dihydroxy-p-cymene<br />
Thymol<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
2-(2-Hydroxy-4-methylphenyl)propan-1-ol<br />
5-Hydroxymethyl-2-(1-methylethyl)phenol<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
3-Hydroxy-4-(1-methylethyl)bezoic acid<br />
2-(2-Hydroxy-4-methylphenyl)propionic acid<br />
OH<br />
2-(4-Hydroxymethyl-2-hydroxyphenyl)propan-1-ol<br />
FIGURE 8.21 Proposed metabolism <strong>of</strong> thymol in rats. (Adapted from Austgulen, L.T. et al., 1987. Pharmacol.<br />
Toxicol., 61: 98–102; Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus von Monterpenen und Sesquiterpenen in Mensch<br />
und Säugetier: Bedeutung für die pharmazeutische Praxis. MPharm. diploma thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna,<br />
Austria.)<br />
enzymes <strong>and</strong> human liver microsomes have shown that cytochrome P450 isoenzymes participate in<br />
the metabolism <strong>of</strong> farnesol to 12-hydroxyfarnesol (Figure 8.23). Subsequently, farnesol <strong>and</strong><br />
12-hydroxyfarnesol are glucuronidated to farnesyl glucuronide <strong>and</strong> 12-hydroxyfarnesyl glucuronide,<br />
respecively (DeBarber et al., 2004; Staines et al., 2004).<br />
8.3.3 LONGIFOLENE<br />
Longifolene is the common chemical name <strong>of</strong> a naturally occurring, oily liquid hydrocarbon, which<br />
is found primarily in certain pine resins especially in that <strong>of</strong> Pinus longifolia, a tree that gives longifolene<br />
its name. Besides pines, longifolene is also a main constituent <strong>of</strong> clove (Wichtel, 2002). Based<br />
on its pleasant odor, longifolene is used in the food industry. In rabbits, longifolene is metabolized<br />
as follows: attack on the exo-methylene group from the endo-face to form its epoxide followed by<br />
isomerization <strong>of</strong> the epoxide to a stable endo-aldehyde. Then rapid cytochrome P450-catalyzed<br />
hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> this endo-aldehyde occurs (Asakawa et al., 1986) (Figure 8.24).
230 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
H<br />
H<br />
(–)-Caryophyllene<br />
Rabbit<br />
in vivo<br />
Rabbit<br />
in vivo<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
(–)-Caryophyllene-5,6-oxide<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO H<br />
H<br />
HO H O<br />
H<br />
Caryophyllene-5,6-oxide-2,12-diol<br />
(10S)-(–)-14-Hydroxycaryophyllene-5,6-oxide<br />
FIGURE 8.22 Proposed metabolism <strong>of</strong> b-caryophyllene in rabbits. (Adapted from Asakawa, Y. et al.,<br />
1981. J. Pharm. Sci., 70: 710–711; Asakawa, Y. et al., 1986. Xenobiotica, 16: 753–767; Jahrmann, R., 2007.<br />
Metabolismus von Monterpenen und Sesquiterpenen in Mensch und Säugetier: Bedeutung für die pharmazeutische<br />
Praxis. MPharm. diploma thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Austria.)<br />
8.3.4 PATCHOULI ALCOHOL<br />
Patchouli alcohol is the major active ingredient <strong>and</strong> the most odor-intensive component <strong>of</strong> patchouli<br />
oil, the volatile oil <strong>of</strong> Pogostemon cablin <strong>and</strong> Pogostemon patchouli. Patchouli oil is widely used in<br />
the cosmetic <strong>and</strong> oral hygiene industries to scent perfumes <strong>and</strong> flavor toothpaste (Bang et al., 1975).<br />
Modern research has also demonstrated various pharmacological activities <strong>of</strong> this oil including<br />
antiemetic, antibacterial, <strong>and</strong> antifungal properties. In rabbits <strong>and</strong> dogs, patchouli alcohol is<br />
hydroxylated at the C-15 yielding a diol that is subsequently oxidized to a hydroxyl acid. After<br />
decarboxylation <strong>and</strong> oxidation, the 3,4-unsaturated norpatchoulen-1-ol is formed, which also has a<br />
characteristic odor (Figure 8.25). All these urinary metabolites are also found as glucuronides,<br />
explaining their excellent water solubility (Bang et al., 1975; Ishida, 2005).
Metabolism <strong>of</strong> Terpenoids in Animal Models <strong>and</strong> Humans 231<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
Human<br />
in vitro<br />
Hydroxyfarnesyl-glucuronide<br />
OH<br />
Human,<br />
rabbit, rat<br />
in vitro<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
Farnesol<br />
Human<br />
in vitro<br />
Hydroxyfarnesol<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
Farnesyl-glucuronide<br />
FIGURE 8.23 Proposed metabolism <strong>of</strong> farnesol in human liver microsomes. (Adapted from DeBarber, A.E.<br />
et al., 2004. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1682: 18–27; Staines, A.G. et al., 2004. Biochem. J., 384: 637–645;<br />
Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus von Monterpenen und Sesquiterpenen in Mensch und Säugetier: Bedeutung<br />
für die pharmazeutische Praxis. MPharm. diploma thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Austria.)<br />
Rabbit<br />
in vivo<br />
O<br />
Longifolene<br />
HO<br />
CHO<br />
CHO<br />
14-Hydroxyisolongifolaldehyde<br />
Isolongifolaldehyde<br />
FIGURE 8.24 Proposed metabolism <strong>of</strong> (+)-longifolene in rabbits. (Adapted from Asakawa, Y. et al., 1986.<br />
Xenobiotica, 16: 753–767; Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus von Monterpenen und Sesquiterpenen in<br />
Mensch und Säugetier: Bedeutung für die pharmazeutische Praxis. MPharm. diploma thesis, University <strong>of</strong><br />
Vienna, Austria.)
232 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
HO<br />
Rabbit<br />
in vivo<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
Patchouli alcohol<br />
Yielding diol<br />
Hydroxyoxid acid<br />
3,4-Unsaturated norpatchoulen-1-ol<br />
FIGURE 8.25 Proposed metabolism <strong>of</strong> patchouli alcohol in rabbits <strong>and</strong> dogs. (Adapted from Bang, L. et al.,<br />
1975. Tetrahedron Lett. 26: 2211–2214; Ishida, T., 2005. Chem. Biodivers., 2: 569–590; Jahrmann, R., 2007.<br />
Metabolismus von Monterpenen und Sesquiterpenen in Mensch und Säugetier: Bedeutung für die pharmazeutische<br />
Praxis. MPharm. diploma thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Austria.)<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Asakawa, Y., T. Ishida, M. Toyota, <strong>and</strong> T. Takemoto, 1986. Terpenoid biotransformation in mammals IV.<br />
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-longifolene, (-)-caryophyllene, (-)-caryophyllene oxide, (-)-cyclocolorenone,<br />
(+)-nootkatone, (-)-elemol, (-)-abietic <strong>and</strong> (+)-dehydroabietic acid in rabbits. Xenobiotica, 16:<br />
753–767.<br />
Asakawa, Y., Z. Tair, <strong>and</strong> T. Takemoto, 1981. X-ray crystal structure analysis <strong>of</strong> 14-hydroxycaryophyllene<br />
oxide, a new metabolite <strong>of</strong> (-)-caryophyllene, in rabbits. J. Pharm. Sci., 70: 710–711.<br />
Asakawa, Y., M. Toyota, <strong>and</strong> T. Ishida, 1988. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1,4-cineole, a monoterpene ether. Xenobiotica,<br />
18: 1129–1134.<br />
Austgulen, L.T., E. Solheim, <strong>and</strong> R.R. Schelin, 1987. Metabolism in rats <strong>of</strong> p-cymene derivates: Carvacrol <strong>and</strong><br />
thymol. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 61: 98–102.<br />
Bang, L., G. Ourisson, <strong>and</strong> P. Teisseire, 1975. Hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> patchoulol by rabbits. Semisynthesis <strong>of</strong><br />
nor-patchoulenol, the odour carrier <strong>of</strong> patchouli oil. Tetrahedron Lett. 26: 2211–2214.<br />
Bickers, D., P. Calow, H. Greim, J.M. Hanifin, A.E. Rogers, J.H. Saurat, I.G. Sipes, R.L. Smith, <strong>and</strong> H. Tagami,<br />
2003. A toxicologic <strong>and</strong> dermatologic assessment <strong>of</strong> linalool <strong>and</strong> related esters when used as fragrance<br />
ingredients. Food Chem. Toxicol., 41: 919–942.<br />
Boyer, C.S. <strong>and</strong> D.R. Petersen, 1991. The metabolism <strong>of</strong> 3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octydienal (citral) in rat hepatic<br />
mitochondrial <strong>and</strong> cytosolic fractions: Interactions with aldehyde <strong>and</strong> alcohol dehydrogenases. Drug<br />
Metab. Dispos., 19: 81–86.<br />
Chadha, A. <strong>and</strong> M.K. Madyastha, 1984. Metabolism <strong>of</strong> geraniol <strong>and</strong> linalool in the rat <strong>and</strong> effects on liver <strong>and</strong><br />
lung microsomal enzymes. Xenobiotica, 14: 365–374.<br />
Crowell, P.L., S. Lin, E. Vedejs, <strong>and</strong> M.N. Gould, 1992. Identification <strong>of</strong> metabolites <strong>of</strong> the antitumor agent<br />
d-limonene capable <strong>of</strong> inhibiting protein isoprenylatio <strong>and</strong> cell growth. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.,<br />
31: 205–212.<br />
DeBarber, A.E., L. Bleyle, J.-B. Roullet, <strong>and</strong> D.R. Koop, 2004. w-Hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> farnesol by mammalian<br />
cytochromes P450. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1682: 18–27.<br />
Diliberto, J.J., P. Srinivas, D. Overstreet, G. Usha, L.T. Burk, <strong>and</strong> L.S. Birnbaum, 1990. Metabolism <strong>of</strong> citral,<br />
an a,b-unsaturated aldehyde, in male F344 rats. Drug Metab. Dispos., 18: 886–875.<br />
Engel, W., 2001. In vivo studies on the metabolism <strong>of</strong> the monoterpenes S-(+)- <strong>and</strong> R-(-)-carvon in humans<br />
using the metabolism <strong>of</strong> ingestion-correlated amounts (MICA) approach. J. Agric. Food Chem.,<br />
49: 4069–4075.<br />
Engel, W., 2003. In vivo studies on the metabolism <strong>of</strong> the monoterpene pulegone in humans using the metabolism<br />
<strong>of</strong> ingestion-correlated amounts (MICA) approach: Explanation for the toxicity differences between<br />
(S)-(-)- <strong>and</strong> (R)-(+)-pulegon. J. Agric. Food Chem., 51: 6589–6597.<br />
Eriksson, K. <strong>and</strong> J.O. Levin, 1996. Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric identification <strong>of</strong> metabolites from<br />
a-pinene in human urine after occupational exposure to sawing fumes. J. Chromatogr. B, 677: 85–98.<br />
Gelal, A., P. Jacob, L. Yu, <strong>and</strong> N.L. Benowitz, 1999. Disposition kinetics <strong>and</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> menthol. Clin.<br />
Pharmacol. Ther., 66: 128–235.<br />
Gyoubu, K. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2007. In vitro metabolism <strong>of</strong> (-)-camphor using human liver microsomes <strong>and</strong><br />
CYP2A6. Biol. Pharm. Bull., 30: 230–233.
Metabolism <strong>of</strong> Terpenoids in Animal Models <strong>and</strong> Humans 233<br />
Hall, R.L. <strong>and</strong> B.L. Oser, 1965. Recent progress in the consideration <strong>of</strong> flavoring ingredients under the foodadditives<br />
amendment III GRAS substances. Food Technol., 19: 253–271.<br />
Höld, K.M., N.S. Sirisoma, T. Ikeda, T. Narahashi, <strong>and</strong> J.E. Casida, 2000. a-Thujone (the active component <strong>of</strong><br />
absinthe): g-Aminobutyric acid type A receptor modulation <strong>and</strong> metabolic detoxification. Environ. Chem.<br />
Toxicol., 97: 3826–3831.<br />
Höld, K.M., N.S. Sirisoma, <strong>and</strong> J.E. Casida, 2001. Detoxification <strong>of</strong> a-<strong>and</strong> b-thujones (the active ingredients <strong>of</strong><br />
absinthe): Site specificity <strong>and</strong> species differences in cytochrome P450 oxidation in vitro <strong>and</strong> in vivo.<br />
Chem. Res. Toxicol., 14: 589–595.<br />
Ishida, T., 2005. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> terpenoids by mammals, microorganisms, <strong>and</strong> plant-cultured cells.<br />
Chem. Biodivers., 2: 569–590.<br />
Ishida, T., Y. Asakawa, T. Takemoto, <strong>and</strong> T. Aratani, 1979. Terpenoid biotransformation in mammals<br />
II: Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> dl-camphene in rabbits. J. Pharm. Sci., 68: 928–930.<br />
Ishida, T., Y. Asakawa, T. Takemoto, <strong>and</strong> T. Aratani, 1981. Terpenoid biotransformation in mammals III:<br />
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> a-pinene, b-pinene, pinane, 3-carene, carane, myrcene, <strong>and</strong> p-cymene in rabbits.<br />
J. Pharm. Sci., 70: 406–415.<br />
Ishida, T., M. Toyota, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1989. Terpenoid biotransformation in mammals. V. Metabolism<br />
<strong>of</strong> (+)-citronellal, (+/-)-7-hydroxycitronellal, citral, (-)-perillaldehyd, (-)-myrtenal, cuminaldehyde,<br />
thujone, <strong>and</strong> (+/-)-carvone in rabbits. Xenobiotica, 19: 843–855.<br />
Jäger, W., M. Mayer, P. Platzer, G. Resnicek, H. Dietrich, <strong>and</strong> G. Buchbauer, 2000. Stereoselective metabolism<br />
<strong>of</strong> the monoterpene carvone by rat <strong>and</strong> human liver microsomes. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 52: 191–197.<br />
Jäger, W., M. Mayer, G. Resnicek, <strong>and</strong> G. Buchbauer, 2001. Percutaneose absorbtion <strong>of</strong> the monoterpene<br />
carvone: Implication <strong>of</strong> stereoselective metabolism on blood. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 53: 637–642.<br />
Jahrmann, R., 2007. Metabolismus von Monterpenen und Sesquiterpenen in Mensch und Säugetier: Bedeutung<br />
für die pharmazeutische Praxis. MPharm. diploma thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Austria.<br />
Leibmann, K.C. <strong>and</strong> E. Ortiz, 1972. Mammalian metabolism <strong>of</strong> terpenoids, I. Reduction <strong>and</strong> hydroxylation <strong>of</strong><br />
camphor <strong>and</strong> related compounds. Drug Metab. Dispos., 1: 543–551.<br />
Madyastha, K.M. <strong>and</strong> C.P. Raj, 1992. Metabolic fate <strong>of</strong> menth<strong>of</strong>uran in rats. Drug Metab. Dispos., 20:<br />
295–301.<br />
Madyastha, K.M. <strong>and</strong> V. Srivatsan, 1988a. Biotransformations <strong>of</strong> a-terpineol in the rat: Its effects on the liver<br />
microsomal cytochrome P450 system. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 41: 17–25.<br />
Madyastha, K.M. <strong>and</strong> V. Srivatsan, 1988b. Studies on the metabolism <strong>of</strong> l-menthol in rats. Drug Metab. Dispos.,<br />
16: 765–772.<br />
Mendes, A.C., M.M. Caldeira, C. Silva, S.C. Burgess, M.E. Merritt, F. Gomes, C. Barosa et al., 2006. Hepatic<br />
UDP-glucose 13C isotopomers from [U- 13 C] glucose: A sample analysis by 13 C NMR <strong>of</strong> urinary menthol<br />
glucuronide. Magn. Reson. Med., 56: 1121–1125.<br />
Miyazawa, M. <strong>and</strong> K. Gyoubu, 2006. Metabolism <strong>of</strong> (+)-fenchon by CYP2A6 <strong>and</strong> CYP2B6 in human liver<br />
microsomes. Biol. Pharm. Bull., 29: 2354–2358.<br />
Miyazawa, M., M. Shindo, <strong>and</strong> T. Shimada, 2001a. Roles <strong>of</strong> cytochrome P450 3A enzymes in the 2-hydroxylation<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1,4-cineole, a monoterpene cyclic ether, by rat <strong>and</strong> human liver microsomes. Xenobiotica,<br />
31: 713–723.<br />
Miyazawa, M., M. Shindo, <strong>and</strong> T. Shimada, 2001b. Oxidation <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole, monoterpene cyclic ether originated<br />
from Eucalyptus polybractea, by cytochrome P450 3A enzymes in rat <strong>and</strong> human liver microsomes.<br />
Drug Metab. Dispos., 29: 200–205.<br />
Miyazawa, M., M. Shindo, <strong>and</strong> T. Shimada, 2002. Metabolism <strong>of</strong> (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-limonene to respective carveols<br />
<strong>and</strong> perillyl alcohols by CYP2C9 <strong>and</strong> CYP2C19 in human liver microsomes. Drug Metab. Dispos.,<br />
30: 602–607.<br />
Mühlbauer, R.C., A. Lozano, S. Palacio, A. Reinli, <strong>and</strong> R. Felix, 2003. Common herbs, essential oils, <strong>and</strong><br />
monoterpenes potently modulate bone metabolism. Bone, 32: 372–380.<br />
Robertson, J.S. <strong>and</strong> M. Hussain, 1969. Metabolism <strong>of</strong> camphors <strong>and</strong> related compounds. Biochem. J.,<br />
113: 57–65.<br />
Shimada, T., M. Shindo, <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2002. Species differences in the metabolism <strong>of</strong> R-(-)- <strong>and</strong> S-(+)-<br />
limonenes <strong>and</strong> their metabolites, carveols <strong>and</strong> carvones, by cytochrome P450 enzymes in liver microsomes<br />
<strong>of</strong> mice, rats, guinea pigs, rabbits, dogs, monkeys, <strong>and</strong> humans. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinetics,<br />
17: 507–515.<br />
Spatzenegger, M. <strong>and</strong> W. Jäger, 1995. Clinical importance <strong>of</strong> hepatic cytochrome P450 in drug metabolism.<br />
Drug Metab. Rev., 27: 397–417.
234 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Spichinger M., R.C. Mühlbauer, <strong>and</strong> R. Brenneisen, 2004. Determination <strong>of</strong> menthol in plasma <strong>and</strong> urine <strong>of</strong> rats<br />
<strong>and</strong> human by headspace solid phase microextraction <strong>and</strong> gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.<br />
J. Chromatogr. B, 799: 111–117.<br />
Staines, A.G., P. Sindelpar, M.W.H. Coughtrie, <strong>and</strong> B. Burchell, 2004. Farnesol is glucuonidated in human<br />
liver, kidney <strong>and</strong> intestine in vitro, <strong>and</strong> is novel substrate for UGT2B7 <strong>and</strong> UGT1A1. Biochem. J.,<br />
384: 637–645.<br />
Wichtel, M., 2002. Teedrogen und Phytopharmaka. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft.<br />
Yamaguchi, T., J. Caldwell, <strong>and</strong> P.B. Farmer, 1994. Metabolic fate <strong>of</strong> [3H]-l-menthol in the rat. Drug Metab.<br />
Dispos., 22: 616–624.
9<br />
Biological Activities<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Gerhard Buchbauer<br />
CONTENTS<br />
9.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 235<br />
9.1.1 Anticancer Properties ............................................................................................. 236<br />
9.1.2 Antinociceptive Effects .......................................................................................... 239<br />
9.1.3 Antiviral Activities ................................................................................................. 244<br />
9.1.4 Antiphlogistic Activity ........................................................................................... 246<br />
9.1.5 Penetration Enhancement ....................................................................................... 254<br />
9.1.6 Antioxidative Properties ......................................................................................... 256<br />
9.1.6.1 Reactive Oxygen Species ......................................................................... 256<br />
9.1.6.2 Antioxidants ............................................................................................. 256<br />
9.1.7 Test Methods ........................................................................................................... 257<br />
9.1.7.1 Free Radical Scavenging Assay ............................................................... 257<br />
9.1.7.2 b-Carotene Bleaching Test ....................................................................... 257<br />
9.1.7.3 Deoxyribose Assay ................................................................................... 258<br />
9.1.7.4 TBA Test .................................................................................................. 258<br />
9.1.7.5 Xanthine–Xanthine Oxidase Assay ......................................................... 258<br />
9.1.7.6 Linoleic Acid Assay ................................................................................. 258<br />
References ................................................................................................................................... 273<br />
9.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
The term “biological” in this context comprises all properties, from for example “abdomen” to<br />
“zymase,” which any natural product may possess. And these can be attributed to the whole animated<br />
nature, to all living organisms, namely plants, animals, <strong>and</strong> especially humans. However,<br />
only the effects <strong>of</strong> essential oils (EOs) on human beings is the topic <strong>of</strong> the present chapter. Excluded<br />
therefore, are all “botanical” activities, for example, plant care <strong>and</strong> interplant communication such<br />
as the prevention <strong>of</strong> germination <strong>of</strong> seeds <strong>of</strong> a potentially rivalry plant by emitting an EO, or the<br />
“cry for help” <strong>of</strong> a plant when it is attacked by pests <strong>and</strong> the “victim” volatilizes a fragrance which<br />
itself attracts enemies <strong>of</strong> these varmints. Neither are covered animal messengers, so-called pheromones,<br />
as well as EOs as veterinary therapeutics in animal care <strong>and</strong> feed. All these properties go<br />
beyond the scope <strong>and</strong> frame <strong>of</strong> this treatise <strong>and</strong> would rather fill a separate volume.<br />
Therefore, the subject matter <strong>of</strong> this chapter is the therapeutic uses <strong>of</strong> EOs <strong>and</strong>/or single fragrance<br />
compounds in human medicine <strong>and</strong> care. However, even this field seems to be too extensive,<br />
so that cosmetic uses <strong>and</strong> repellents are excluded, too. Since a chapter on the pharmacological properties<br />
<strong>of</strong> EOs is already contained in this volume (see Chapter 10), only those pharmacological activities<br />
235
236 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
which are <strong>of</strong> secondary (but not less important!) interest to the traditional pharmacologist will be<br />
discussed in this chapter. In particular, these are properties which do not directly aim at the central<br />
or autonomic nervous systems <strong>and</strong> for which the molecular mechanisms are only <strong>of</strong> minor relevance,<br />
for example, antioxidative effects, anticancer properties, penetration enhancing activities,<br />
<strong>and</strong> so on.<br />
In general, the prominent literature databases have been searched <strong>and</strong> the literature mainly back<br />
to the year 2000 is discussed in this chapter. Readers interested in earlier studies are referred to<br />
three reviews by the author, which were published some years ago (Buchbauer, 2002, 2004, 2007).<br />
However, where it seemed necessary also earlier investigations have been included here <strong>and</strong> topics<br />
are discussed shortly which were not dealt with in these earlier compilations. Nevertheless, in a few<br />
cases some overlapping with related chapters may occur in the present book.<br />
9.1.1 ANTICANCER PROPERTIES*<br />
A very promising field <strong>of</strong> treatment with EOs is their application against tumors. Especially since<br />
the 1990s the anticancer properties <strong>of</strong> EOs <strong>and</strong>/or their main constituents <strong>and</strong>/or metabolites have<br />
gained more <strong>and</strong> more interest, inasmuch as such a “natural” therapy is accepted all over the world<br />
by the patients. One <strong>of</strong> the most prominent compounds in that sense is either d-limonene, the main<br />
constituent <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> sweet orange peel oil (Citrus sinensis, Rutaceae) as well as <strong>of</strong> other citrus<br />
fruit peel oils, or perillyl alcohol, the most important metabolite <strong>of</strong> this monoterpene hydrocarbon.<br />
Perillyl alcohol has been developed as a clinical c<strong>and</strong>idate at the National Cancer Institute because<br />
<strong>of</strong> its greater potency than limonene, which may enable potentially effective systemic concentrations<br />
<strong>of</strong> the active principles to be achieved at considerably lower doses (Phillips et al., 1995).<br />
Perillyl alcohol is effective as an inhibitor <strong>of</strong> farnesyl transferase. In the early developmental stages<br />
<strong>of</strong> mouse lung carcinogenesis the ras-protein undergoes a series <strong>of</strong> modifications, <strong>and</strong> farnesylation<br />
at the cysteine is one <strong>of</strong> these, which leads to the anchoring <strong>of</strong> ras-p-21-gen to the plasma membrane<br />
in its biologically active state. Perillyl alcohol administered to test mice showed a 22% reduction in<br />
tumor incidence <strong>and</strong> a 58% reduction in tumor multiplicity (Lantry et al., 1997). Perillyl alcohol<br />
reduced the growth <strong>of</strong> hamster pancreatic tumors (>50% <strong>of</strong> the controls), or even led to a complete<br />
regression (16%). Thus, perillyl alcohol may be an effective chemotherapeutic agent for human<br />
pancreatic cancer (Löw-Baselli et al., 2000; Stark et al., 1995). Perillyl alcohol also inhibited significantly<br />
the incidence (percentage <strong>of</strong> animals with tumors) <strong>and</strong> multiplicity (tumor/animals) <strong>of</strong><br />
invasive adenocarcinomas <strong>of</strong> the colon <strong>and</strong> exhibited increased apoptosis <strong>of</strong> the tumor cells.<br />
Scientists from the Purdue University report that the rate <strong>of</strong> apoptosis is over sixfold higher in perillyl<br />
alcohol-treated pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells than in untreated cells, <strong>and</strong> that the effect <strong>of</strong><br />
perillyl alcohol on pancreatic tumor cells is significantly greater than its effect on nonmalignant<br />
pancreatic ductal cells (Stayrock et al., 1997). Moreover, this monoterpene alcohol-induced increase<br />
in apoptosis in all <strong>of</strong> the pancreatic tumor cells is associated with a 2–8-fold increase in the expression<br />
<strong>of</strong> a proapoptotic protein which preferentially stimulates the apoptosis in malignant cells.<br />
Perillyl alcohol is also effective in reducing liver tumor growth. Two weeks after diethyl nitrosamine<br />
exposure was discontinued, the animals were divided into perillyl alcohol-treated <strong>and</strong><br />
untreated groups. The mean liver tumor weight for the perillyl alcohol-treated rats <strong>of</strong> perillyl alcohol<br />
treatment was 10-fold less than that for the untreated animals (Mills et al., 1995). A newer study<br />
found that this monoterpene alcohol potentially attenuates ferric-nitrilo-acetate-induced oxidative<br />
damage <strong>and</strong> tumor promotional events (Jahangir et al., 2007). Monoterpenes such as d-limonene<br />
<strong>and</strong> perillyl alcohol, as well as other terpene alcohols, such as geraniol, carveol, farnesol, nerolidol,<br />
b-citronellol, linalool, <strong>and</strong> menthol, showed inhibitory activities on induced neoplasia <strong>of</strong> the large<br />
bowl <strong>and</strong> duodenum. Nerolidol, especially, has an impact on the protein prenylation <strong>and</strong> is able to<br />
reduce the adenomas in rats fed with these compounds to an extent <strong>of</strong> about 82% compared to the<br />
* Adorjan, M., 2007. Part <strong>of</strong> her master thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna.
Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 237<br />
controls (Wattenberg, 1991). Geraniol prevents the growth <strong>of</strong> cultured tumor cells, especially those<br />
<strong>of</strong> rat hepatomas <strong>and</strong> melanomas (Yu et al., 1995). Dietary geraniol increased the 50% survival time<br />
<strong>of</strong> mice significantly <strong>and</strong> even 20% <strong>of</strong> the animals remained free <strong>of</strong> tumors when fed a geraniolcontaining<br />
diet 14 days before an intraperitoneal transfer <strong>of</strong> the tumor cells (Sh<strong>of</strong>f et al., 1991).<br />
Similar studies indicate that the colon tumors <strong>of</strong> animals fed with perillyl alcohol exhibited increased<br />
apoptosis as compared to those fed the control diet (Reddy et al., 1997). Therefore, consumption <strong>of</strong><br />
diets containing fruits <strong>and</strong> vegetables rich in monoterpenes, such as d-limonene, reduces the risk <strong>of</strong><br />
developing cancer <strong>of</strong> the colon, mammary gl<strong>and</strong>, liver, pancreas, <strong>and</strong> lung (Crowell, 1999).<br />
In the following, the anticancer activity <strong>of</strong> some EOs published since 2000 up to now will be<br />
discussed. In these papers several different cell lines were used to determine the anticancer activity<br />
<strong>of</strong> the EOs tested: A-549 (human lung carcinoma cell line), B16F10 (mouse cell line), CO25 (N-ras<br />
transformed mouse myoblast cell line), DLD-1 (human colon adenocarcinoma cell line), Hep-2<br />
(human laryngeal cancer cell line), HL-60 (human promyelocytic leukemia cell line), J774 (mouse<br />
monocytic cell line), K562 (human erythroleucemic cell line), nuclear-factor-k-B (human mouth<br />
epidermal carcinoma cell line), M14 WT (human melanoma cell line), Neuro-2a (mouse neuroblastoma<br />
cell line), P388 (murine leukemia cell line), SP2/0 (mouse plasmocytoma cell line), <strong>and</strong> then<br />
Caco-2, K562, MCF-7, PC-3, M4BEU, ACHN, Bel-7402, Hep G2, HeLa, <strong>and</strong> CT-26 (different<br />
human cancer cell lines).<br />
El Tantawy et al. (2000) investigated the EO <strong>of</strong> Senecio mikanioides O. (cape ivy, Asteraceae),<br />
grown in Egypt. The main components <strong>of</strong> the oil <strong>of</strong> the plant’s aerial parts were a-pinene (23%) <strong>and</strong><br />
b-myrcene (11.3%), whereas dehydroaromadendrene (31.8%) <strong>and</strong> camphene (19.7%) were the major<br />
compounds in the underground organs, analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry<br />
(GC-MS). Both EOs had a potent cytotoxic activity against the growth <strong>of</strong> certain human cell lines<br />
in vitro. Another study dealt with the EO <strong>of</strong> Nigella sativa (black cumin, Ranunculaceae) seeds <strong>and</strong><br />
its main constituent, thymoquinone (Badary et al., 2000). This substance was tested against fibrosarcomas<br />
induced by 20-methylcholanthrene (MC) in Swiss albino mice in vivo <strong>and</strong> in vitro. The<br />
mice got 0.01% thymoquinone in drinking water 1 week before <strong>and</strong> thereafter MC treatment. At the<br />
end <strong>of</strong> the experiment there was a significant inhibition <strong>of</strong> MC-induced fibrosarcoma compared to<br />
MC alone (tumor incidence 43%, less MC-induced mortality). In comparison to the control group,<br />
in the liver <strong>of</strong> MC-induced tumor-bearing mice a reduction in hepatic lipid peroxides, an increase in<br />
glutathione content <strong>and</strong> enzyme activities <strong>of</strong> glutathione S-transferase (GST) <strong>and</strong> quinone transferase<br />
(QT) are observed. Furthermore, the in vitro tests showed an inhibition <strong>of</strong> the survival <strong>of</strong> the<br />
tumor cells. These data indicate that thymoquinone could be a powerful chemopreventive agent<br />
against MC-induced fibrosarcoma tumors, probably because <strong>of</strong> its interference with DNA synthesis.<br />
Some years later, Ali <strong>and</strong> Blunden (2003) published a review about the seeds <strong>of</strong> black cumin, which<br />
is used in folk medicine. The EO <strong>and</strong> its major constituent thymoquinone were found to have antineoplastic<br />
activity <strong>and</strong> to be protective against nephrotoxicity <strong>and</strong> hepatotoxicity induced by diseases<br />
or chemicals.<br />
The anticancerogenic effect <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> the Melissa <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L. (Lamiaceae) was investigated<br />
by Allahverdiyev et al. (2001) using cell cultures <strong>of</strong> Hep-2 cells derived from human laryngeal<br />
cancer. The activity <strong>of</strong> the EO was examined by morphologic changes <strong>and</strong> by flow cytometry,<br />
compared to methotrexate (MTX, an antagonist <strong>of</strong> folic acid) <strong>and</strong> etoposid, a partial synthetically<br />
obtainable glycoside <strong>of</strong> podophyllotoxin. The EO was able to terminate the cells <strong>of</strong> the G1 <strong>and</strong> S<br />
phases, whereas MTX was active in the S <strong>and</strong> G2 phases <strong>and</strong> etoposid in the G1 phase. Their findings<br />
showed that the essential balm oil possesses anticancerogenic effects because MTX blocks the<br />
transfer <strong>of</strong> one-carbon fragments by its affinity to dihydr<strong>of</strong>olic acid reductase, which leads to an<br />
obstruction <strong>of</strong> the nucleic acid synthesis. De Sousa et al. (2004) found in an in vitro assay that the<br />
EO <strong>of</strong> this plant was very effective against various human cancer cell lines (A549, MCF-7, Caco-2,<br />
HL-60, K562) <strong>and</strong> mouse cell lines (B16F10).<br />
Legault et al. (2003) performed a study about the antitumor activity <strong>of</strong> balsam fir oil (Abies<br />
balsamea, Pinaceae) using the tumor cell lines MCF-7, PC-3, A-549, DLD-1, M4BEU, <strong>and</strong> CT-26.
238 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Balsam fir oil was active against all tumor cell lines with GI 50 values ranging from 0.76 to 1.7 mg/ mL.<br />
After GC-MS analysis among the monoterpenes found (about 96%) a-humulene proved itself to be<br />
responsible for cytotoxicity (GI 50 55 mM). Both the EO <strong>and</strong> a-humulene induced a dose- <strong>and</strong> timedependent<br />
decrease in cellular glutathione (GSH) content <strong>and</strong> an increase in reactive oxygen species<br />
(ROS) production.<br />
Zeytinoglu et al. (2003) studied the effects <strong>of</strong> carvacrol, one <strong>of</strong> the main compounds in the EO<br />
<strong>of</strong> oregano (obtained from the Lamiaceae Origanum onites L.) on the DNA synthesis <strong>of</strong> N-rastransformed<br />
mouse myoblast cells CO25. This monoterpenic phenol was able to inhibit the DNA<br />
synthesis in the growth medium <strong>and</strong> ras-activating medium, which contained dexamethason. The<br />
authors concluded that carvacrol may find application in cancer therapy because <strong>of</strong> its growth inhibition<br />
<strong>of</strong> myoblast cells even after activation <strong>of</strong> mutated N-ras-oncogene. Also, Ipek et al. (2003)<br />
investigated the thymol-isomer carvacrol using the in vitro sister-chromatid-exchange (SCE) assay<br />
on human peripheral blood lymphocytes. The inhibitory effect <strong>of</strong> carvacrol was checked in the presence<br />
<strong>of</strong> mitomycin C (MMC) in the same assay. The formation <strong>of</strong> SCE was not increased by any<br />
dose <strong>of</strong> carvacrol, while it decreased the rate <strong>of</strong> SCE induced by MMC. These findings demonstrate<br />
that carvacrol shows a significant antigenotoxic activity in mammalian cells, indicating its usage as<br />
an antigenotoxic agent.<br />
The fresh leaf the EO <strong>of</strong> the Moraceae Streblus asper Lour. comprising the major compounds<br />
phytol (45.1%), a-farnesene (6.4%), trans-farnesyl acetate (5.8%), caryophyllene (4.9%), <strong>and</strong><br />
trans,trans-a-farnesene (2.0%) was tested against mouse lymphocytic leukemia cells (P388)<br />
<strong>and</strong> showed a significant anticancer activity (ED 50 30 mg/mL) (Phutdhawong et al., 2004). Also<br />
another EO, this time from the fruits <strong>of</strong> the Anonaceae Xylopia aethiopica (Ethiopian pepper),<br />
a plant grown in Nigeria, showed in a concentration <strong>of</strong> 5 mg/mL a cytotoxic effect in the carcinoma<br />
cell line (Hep-2) (Asekun <strong>and</strong> Adeniyi, 2004). Last but not least, also terpinen-4-ol, the<br />
major component <strong>of</strong> the tea tree oil (TTO) (Melaleuca alternifolia, Myrtaceae), was investigated<br />
by Calcabrini et al. (2004) as to its anticancer effects in human melanoma M14 WT cells <strong>and</strong><br />
their drug-resistant counterparts, M14 adriamycin-resistant cells. TTO as well as terpinen-4-ol<br />
were able to impair the growth <strong>of</strong> human M14 melanoma cells, whereupon the effect was stronger<br />
on their resistant variants, which express high levels <strong>of</strong> P-glycoprotein in the plasma membrane,<br />
overcoming resistance to caspase-dependent apoptosis exerted by P-glycoprotein-positive<br />
tumor cells.<br />
Some other EOs from “prominent” plants were investigated if they could be used in cancer<br />
therapy. One <strong>of</strong> these plants is the Asteraceae Chrysanthemum boreale Makino whose EO was<br />
studied on the apoptosis <strong>of</strong> KB cells by Cha et al. (2005). Different cytotoxic effects hallmarking<br />
apoptosis (DNA fragmentation, apoptotic body formation, <strong>and</strong> sub-G1 DNA content) proceeded<br />
dose dependently. The caspase-3 activity was induced rapidly <strong>and</strong> transiently by treatment with an<br />
apoptosis-inducing concentration <strong>of</strong> the EO. Eugenol isolated from clove oil (Eugenia caryophyllata,<br />
Myrtaceae) was investigated by Yoo et al. (2005) using human promyelocytic leukemia cells<br />
(HL-60) <strong>and</strong> might be a potent agent in cancer therapy. After treatment with eugenol the HL-60<br />
cells showed hallmarks <strong>of</strong> apoptosis such as DNA fragmentation <strong>and</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> DNA ladders in<br />
agarose gel electrophoresis. Apoptotic cell death was induced via generation <strong>of</strong> ROS, inducing a<br />
mitochondrial permeability transition, reducing antiapoptotic protein bcl-2 level <strong>and</strong> inducing cytochrome<br />
C release to the cytosol. In traditional medicine very prominent is the bog myrtle Myrica<br />
gale L. (Myricaceae), a native plant in Canada as well as in Scotl<strong>and</strong>. GC-MS analysis <strong>of</strong> the leaf<br />
EO revealed 53 components with myrcene, limonene, a-phell<strong>and</strong>rene, <strong>and</strong> b-caryophyllene as the<br />
major compounds. In the 60-min fraction <strong>of</strong> this oil the caryophyllene oxide content was higher<br />
(9.9%) than in the 30-min fraction (3.5%). The anticancer activity <strong>of</strong> these extracts was tested in<br />
human lung carcinoma cell line A-549 <strong>and</strong> human colon adenocarcinoma cell line DLD-1.<br />
The 60-min fraction showed a higher anticancer activity against both cell types than the 30-min<br />
fraction. The higher cell growth inhibition induced by the 60-min fraction could be caused by the<br />
accumulation <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenes (Sylvestre et al., 2005).
Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 239<br />
Some Thai medicinal plants were checked for their antiproliferative activity on human mouth<br />
epidermal carcinoma (KB) <strong>and</strong> murine leukemia (P388) cell lines by Manosroi et al. (2006) using<br />
the MTX assay. From 17 Thai plants the Myrtaceae Psidium guajava L. (common guava) leaf oil<br />
showed the highest antiproliferative activity in KB cell line, which is 4.37 times more potent than<br />
vincristine, a well-known mitosis inhibitor. In P388 cells the Lamiaceae Ocimum basilicum L.<br />
(basil) oil had the highest effect, which is 12.7 times less potent than the thymin antagonist<br />
5-fluorouracil.<br />
In another study, the EO <strong>of</strong> the leaves <strong>of</strong> the Euphorbiaceae Croton fl avens L. (yellow balsam)<br />
from Guadeloupe, a native plant from the Caribbean area, was analyzed by Sylvestre et al. (2006)<br />
<strong>and</strong> as main components viridiflorene (12.2%), germacrone (5.3%), (E)-g-bisabolene (5.3%), <strong>and</strong><br />
b-caryophyllene (4.9%) ascertained. The EO was found to be active against human lung carcinoma<br />
cell line A-549 <strong>and</strong> human colon adenocarcinoma cell line DLD-1. Three <strong>of</strong> the 47 components<br />
<strong>of</strong> the EO, namely a-cadinol, b-elemene, <strong>and</strong> a-humulene, showed also a cytotoxic activity<br />
against tumor cell lines. Yu et al. (2007) tested the EO <strong>of</strong> the rhizome <strong>of</strong> the Aristolochiaceae<br />
Aristolochia mollissima for its cytotoxicity on four human cancer cell lines (ACHN, Bel-7402,<br />
Hep G2, HeLa). The rhizome oil possessed a significantly greater cytotoxic effect on these cell<br />
lines than the oil from the aerial plant.<br />
The success <strong>of</strong> chemotherapeutic agents is <strong>of</strong>ten hindered by the development <strong>of</strong> drug resistance,<br />
with multidrug-resistant phenotypes reported in a number <strong>of</strong> tumors. In a recent study <strong>of</strong> an Italian<br />
research team, the effects <strong>of</strong> the monoterpene alcohol linalool on the growth <strong>of</strong> two human breast<br />
adenocarcinoma cell lines were investigated, both as a single agent <strong>and</strong> in combination with doxorubicin.<br />
Linalool inhibited only moderately cell proliferation; however, in subtoxic concentrations<br />
potentiates doxorubicin-induced cytotoxicity <strong>and</strong> proapoptotic effects in both cell lines, MCF7 WT<br />
<strong>and</strong> MCF7 AdrR. The results <strong>of</strong> the Italian author group suggest that linalool improves the therapeutic<br />
index in the management <strong>of</strong> breast cancer, especially multidrug resistance (MDR) tumors<br />
(Ravizza et al., 2008).<br />
The EO <strong>of</strong> Cyperus rotundus (Cyperaceae) contains cyperene, a-cyperone, isolongifolen-5-one,<br />
rotundene, <strong>and</strong> cyperorotundene as principal constituents. An in vitro cytotoxicity assay indicated<br />
that this oil was very effective against L1210 leukemia cells, which correlates with significantly<br />
increased apoptotic DNA fragmentation (Kilani et al., 2008).<br />
Finally, Yan et al. (2008) reported on the cytotoxic activity <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>and</strong> extracts <strong>of</strong> Lynderia<br />
strychnifolia (Lauraceae), a plant which is widely used in traditional Chinese medicine. Three<br />
human cancer cell lines (A549, HeLa, <strong>and</strong> Hep G2) were examined by in vitro assays. The strongest<br />
cytotoxicity on the cancer cells showed the leaf oil with 50% inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ) values<br />
ranging between 22 <strong>and</strong> 24 mg/mL after 24 h <strong>of</strong> treatment. The EO <strong>of</strong> the leaves <strong>and</strong> also <strong>of</strong> the roots<br />
exhibited greater cytotoxicity than ethanol extracts.<br />
9.1.2 ANTINOCICEPTIVE EFFECTS*<br />
Although it has been mentioned in the introduction that in this book the comprehensive term<br />
“biological properties” does not include activities affecting the central <strong>and</strong> the peripheral nervous<br />
system, nevertheless for this subchapter a small exception had to be made, because the antinociceptive<br />
system belongs to the central nervous system. The function <strong>of</strong> antinociception is to aggravate<br />
the forwarding <strong>of</strong> pain impulses, which alleviates the sensation <strong>of</strong> pain. It is assumed that the socalled<br />
nociceptors are nerve endings responsible for nociception. They are sensory receptors that<br />
send signals, which cause the perception <strong>of</strong> pain in response to a potentially damaging stimulus.<br />
When the nociceptors are activated, they can trigger a reflex. Due to this system it can be explained<br />
why pains in a stress situation (e.g., caused by an injury after a traffic accident) are not noted<br />
in the first instance, but later after the decay <strong>of</strong> the tension. To test this pain-relieving capacity,<br />
* Adorjan, M., 2007. Part <strong>of</strong> her master thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna.
240 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
experimentally generated pains in animal experiments were performed (Hunnius, 2007). The animal<br />
experiments that were mostly used are as follows:<br />
1. Formalin test: A small volume <strong>of</strong> formalin is injected in the hind paw <strong>of</strong> a rat or a mouse<br />
<strong>and</strong> the pain-related behavior (paw lifting, paw licking) is observed. There are two phases<br />
<strong>of</strong> the test. In the first phase (10 min) the immediate reaction, that reflects the activation <strong>of</strong><br />
peripheral nociceptors, is measured. The second phase (60 min) reflects a spinal hypersensibilization<br />
(Pharmacon, 2007).<br />
2. Acetic acid-induced writhing test: Acetic acid is administered intraperitoneally to the test<br />
animals <strong>and</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> writhings is registered.<br />
3. Tail-fl ick test: The tail is irritated by a thermal stimulus <strong>and</strong> the movement <strong>of</strong> the tail is<br />
monitored.<br />
4. Hot-plate test: The test animal is put on a heated surface (“a hot plate”) <strong>and</strong> the thermal<br />
pain reflexes are recorded.<br />
5. Carrageenin edema test: The test animals get carrageenin injected <strong>and</strong> the volume <strong>of</strong> the<br />
paw is measured.<br />
6. Dextran edema test: The test animals get dextran injected <strong>and</strong> the paw volume is<br />
measured.<br />
7. PBQ-induced abdominal constriction test: The test animals get injected intraperitoneally<br />
a solution <strong>of</strong> p-benzoquinone <strong>and</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> abdominal contractions is recorded.<br />
The antinociceptive effects <strong>of</strong> N. sativa (black cumin, Ranunculaceae) oil <strong>and</strong> its major component<br />
thymoquinone were investigated by Abdel-Fattah et al. (2000). After oral administration <strong>of</strong><br />
doses ranging from 50 to 400 mg/kg the nociceptive response was suppressed in the hot-plate test,<br />
tail-pinch test, acetic acid-induced writhing test, <strong>and</strong> in the early phase <strong>of</strong> formalin test. There was<br />
also an inhibition <strong>of</strong> nociceptive response in the late phase <strong>of</strong> the formalin test after systemic administration<br />
<strong>and</strong> i.p. injection <strong>of</strong> thymoquinone. The s.c. injection <strong>of</strong> naloxone (1 mg/kg) significantly<br />
blocked the antinociceptive effect <strong>of</strong> N. sativa oil <strong>and</strong> thymoquinone in the early phase <strong>of</strong> the formalin<br />
test. In N. sativa oil- <strong>and</strong> thymoquinone-tolerant mice the antinociceptive effect <strong>of</strong> morphine was<br />
significantly reduced, but not vice versa. These findings indicate that N. sativa oil as well as thymoquinone<br />
induce an antinociceptive effect by means <strong>of</strong> an indirect activation <strong>of</strong> m1- <strong>and</strong> m-opioid<br />
receptor subtypes.<br />
The EO from the leaves <strong>of</strong> Cymbopogon citratus (lemongrass, Poaceae) showed in the acetic<br />
acid-induced writhing test a strong inhibition dose dependently. Also in the formalin test the EO<br />
could cause an inhibition especially in the second phase <strong>of</strong> the test (100% at 200 mg/kg i.p.).<br />
Otherwise the opioid antagonist naloxone reversed the central antinociception, suggesting that the<br />
EO <strong>of</strong> Cymbopogon citratus plays a role in central <strong>and</strong> peripheral levels (Viana et al., 2000).<br />
Abdon et al. (2002) studied the antinociceptive effect <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> Croton nepetaefolius Baill.<br />
(Euphorbiaceae), an aromatic plant distributed in the northeast <strong>of</strong> Brazil <strong>and</strong> used in folk medicine<br />
as sedative, orexigen, <strong>and</strong> antispasmodic medicine, on male Swiss mice using the acetic acidinduced<br />
writhings, the hot-plate test <strong>and</strong> the formalin test. The EO was administered orally.<br />
Writhings were reduced effectively at the highest dose tested. In hot-plate test latency was assessed<br />
at all times <strong>of</strong> observation. In formalin test a significant reduction <strong>of</strong> paw licking could be noticed<br />
in the second phase <strong>of</strong> the test at 100 mg/kg <strong>and</strong> in both phases at 300 mg/kg. The analgesic effect<br />
<strong>of</strong> morphine was reversed significantly by pretreatment with naloxone in both phases in the formalin<br />
test.<br />
The antinociceptive effect <strong>of</strong> Satureja hortensis L. (summer savory, Lamiaceae) extracts <strong>and</strong> EO,<br />
a medicinal plant used in Iranian folk medicine as stomachic, muscle, <strong>and</strong> bone pain deliver was<br />
assessed by Hajhashemi et al. (2002). The hydroalcoholic extract as well as the polyphenolic fraction<br />
<strong>and</strong> EO <strong>of</strong> the aerial parts <strong>of</strong> the herb were screened for their antinociceptive activity in the light<br />
tail-flick test, as well as in the formalin <strong>and</strong> also in the acetic acid-induced writhing test. While
Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 241<br />
there was no significant result in the light tail-flick test the EO decreased the number <strong>of</strong> writhings<br />
induced by acetic acid compared to the control at the highest doses given. In the formalin test the<br />
hydroalcoholic extract, then the polyphenolic fraction <strong>and</strong> the EO showed an antinociceptive activity,<br />
which could not be reversed by pretreatment with naloxone or caffeine. These findings demonstrate<br />
that this effect caused by Satureja hortensis L. is not mediated by opioidergic or adenosine<br />
receptors.<br />
Another Satureja species <strong>of</strong> the Lamiaceae family, namely Satureja thymbra L., was investigated<br />
by Karabay-Yavasoglu et al. (2006). The antinociceptive activity <strong>of</strong> the EO was assessed in<br />
mice by the formalin test <strong>and</strong> in rats by the light tail-flick test <strong>and</strong> the hot-plate test. An antinociceptive<br />
effect could only be detected in the hot-plate test during the early phase <strong>and</strong> the late phase. In<br />
the tail-flick test the EO did not produce any significant antinociceptive effect. Nevertheless the<br />
authors concluded that the EO <strong>of</strong> Satureja thymbra may have an analgesic activity in mice <strong>and</strong> rats.<br />
A screening <strong>of</strong> the leaf EO <strong>of</strong> the Lauraceae Laurus nobilis L. (sweet bay) for antinociception in<br />
mice <strong>and</strong> rats was made by Sayyah et al. (2003). They reported a significant analgesic effect in tail<br />
flick <strong>and</strong> formalin tests, which was comparable to reference analgesics such as morphine <strong>and</strong><br />
piroxicam.<br />
In another study the antinociceptive effects <strong>of</strong> Teucrium polium L., a wild-growing Iranian plant<br />
belonging to the Lamiaceae, were investigated by Abdollahi et al. (2003). The total extract <strong>and</strong> the<br />
EO significantly inhibited pain-related behavior in the acetic acid-induced writhing test compared<br />
to the control.<br />
The hydroalcoholic extract, the polyphenolic fraction, <strong>and</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> the Lamiaceae Zataria<br />
multifl ora Boiss. (Zataria), a plant used in traditional medicine for pain therapy <strong>and</strong> several gastrointestinal<br />
diseases, were checked by Jaffary et al. (2004) using writhing, tail flick, <strong>and</strong> formalin test<br />
in mice <strong>and</strong> rats. As main components in the EO linalool, linalyl acetate, <strong>and</strong> p-cymene could be<br />
detected. In the writhing test the EO <strong>and</strong> the hydroalcoholic extract were able to decrease the pain<br />
reflexes significantly (p < .05, n = 6). Both EO <strong>and</strong> hydroalcoholic extract were effective in tail-flick<br />
test (p < .05, p < .01, n = 6), whereas oral administration did not show any effect, which indicates an<br />
inactivation or extensively metabolization in liver or in gastrointestinal sections (see Figure 9.1).<br />
Furthermore, antinociception was indicated in both phases <strong>of</strong> formalin test (p < .01, n = 6). Due to<br />
the overall activity in these tests scientists concluded that Zataria multifl ora has a clear central <strong>and</strong><br />
peripheral antinociceptive activity.<br />
The antinociceptive effects <strong>of</strong> Lav<strong>and</strong>ula hybrida Reverchon “Grosso” (Lamiaceae) EO <strong>and</strong> its<br />
main components linalool <strong>and</strong> linalyl acetate were examined by Barocelli et al. (2004). The number<br />
<strong>of</strong> acetic acid-induced writhings was significantly decreased after oral administration <strong>of</strong> 100 mg/kg or<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
15 min<br />
30 min<br />
45 min<br />
60 min<br />
75 min<br />
90 min<br />
105 min<br />
120 min<br />
Control<br />
5 mg/kg<br />
<strong>Essential</strong><br />
oil<br />
900 mg/kg<br />
p.o.<br />
500 mg/kg<br />
i.p<br />
Morphine<br />
5 mg/kg<br />
FIGURE 9.1 Antinociceptive activity <strong>of</strong> Zataria multifl ora in tail-flick test in rats.
242 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
inhalation <strong>of</strong> lavender EO for 60 min. After pretreatment with naloxone, atropine, <strong>and</strong> mecamylamine<br />
the postinhalative analgesia in hot-plate test was suppressed, which indicates an involvement both<br />
<strong>of</strong> the opioidergic <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the cholinergic system.<br />
In another study the involvement <strong>of</strong> adenosine A1 <strong>and</strong> A2A receptors in (−)-linalool-induced<br />
antinociception was found by Peana et al. (2006b). The authors also mentioned that they have<br />
already shown the antinociceptive effect <strong>of</strong> (−)-linalool in recent studies in different animal<br />
models. The antinociceptive <strong>and</strong> antihyperalgesic effects were ascribed to the stimulation <strong>of</strong><br />
opioidergic, cholinergic, <strong>and</strong> dopaminergic systems as well as to the interaction with K-channels,<br />
the local anesthetic activity, the negative modulation <strong>of</strong> glutamate transmission, <strong>and</strong> the blockade<br />
<strong>of</strong> N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptors (Peana et al., 2006a). In the present study<br />
the authors used 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX), a selective A1 receptor antagonist,<br />
<strong>and</strong> 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPX), a selective A2A receptor antagonist, to<br />
measure the depression <strong>of</strong> the antinociceptive effect <strong>of</strong> (−)-linalool in the hot-plate test in mice.<br />
The decrease <strong>of</strong> the antinociceptive effect <strong>of</strong> linalool was significantly for both DPCPX (0.1 mg/<br />
kg i.p.) <strong>and</strong> DMPX (0.1 mg/kg i.p.) at the highest doses tested. These results indicate that the<br />
antinociceptive effects <strong>of</strong> (−)-linalool, the natural occurring enantiomer in the EOs <strong>of</strong> lavender,<br />
are, at least partially, mediated by adenosine A1 <strong>and</strong> A2A. The authors also examined the role<br />
<strong>of</strong> nitric oxide (NO) <strong>and</strong> prostagl<strong>and</strong>in E2 (PGE2) using lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced<br />
responses in macrophage cell line J774.A1. The nitrite accumulation in the culture medium was<br />
significantly inhibited after exposure <strong>of</strong> LPS-stimulated cells to (−)-linalool, whereas the LPSstimulated<br />
increase <strong>of</strong> inducible nitric oxide synthetase (iNOS) expression was not inhibited at<br />
all. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, (−)-linalool had no effect on the release <strong>of</strong> PGE2 <strong>and</strong> on the increase <strong>of</strong><br />
inducible cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression. These findings demonstrate that the reduction<br />
<strong>of</strong> NO production is, at least partially, responsible for the molecular mechanism <strong>of</strong> (−)-linalool<br />
antinociceptive effect, supposably through cholinergic <strong>and</strong> glutamatergic activities. Coming<br />
back to an earlier study <strong>of</strong> this author group (Peana et al., 2003), the influence <strong>of</strong> opioidergic <strong>and</strong><br />
cholinergic systems in (−)-linalool-induced antinociception was examined. In acid-induced<br />
writhing test a significant reduction <strong>of</strong> writhings could be shown at doses ranging from 25 to<br />
75 mg/kg. Whereupon the effect was completely inverted by naloxone, an opioid receptor antagonist,<br />
<strong>and</strong> by atropine, an unselective muscarinic receptor antagonist. In hot-plate test only the<br />
dose <strong>of</strong> 100 mg/kg was <strong>of</strong> significance. Moreover (−)-linalool showed a dose-dependent increase<br />
<strong>of</strong> motility effects, which excludes the participation <strong>of</strong> any sedative effect. The conclusion <strong>of</strong> this<br />
study is that opioidergic <strong>and</strong> cholinergic system play an important role in (−)-linalool-induced<br />
antinociception.<br />
In a recent published study, the contribution <strong>of</strong> the glutamergic system in the antinociception<br />
elicited by (−)-linalool in mice was investigated (Batista et al., 2008). This monoterpene alcohol<br />
administered intraperitoneally, or orally, or intrathecally inhibited dose dependently glutamateinduced<br />
nociception in mice. Furthermore, (−)-linalool reduced significantly the biting response<br />
caused by intrathecal injection <strong>of</strong> glutamate when this alcohol was given i.p. This antinociception is<br />
possible due to mechanisms operated by ionotropic glutamate receptors, namely AMPA, NMDA,<br />
<strong>and</strong> kainite.<br />
In a further study De Araujo et al. (2005) screened the EO <strong>of</strong> Alpinia zerumbet (Pers.) Burtt.<br />
et Smith (shell ginger, Zingiberaceae), an aromatic plant native to the tropical <strong>and</strong> subtropical<br />
regions <strong>of</strong> the world <strong>and</strong> used in folk medicine for various diseases, including hypertension. In<br />
the acetic acid-induced writhing test the oral administration was effective, in the hot-plate test<br />
the EO increased the remedy time <strong>and</strong> also paw licking could be reduced significantly in the<br />
second phase <strong>of</strong> formalin test at 100 mg/kg. At 300 mg/kg a decrease was noticed in both phases<br />
<strong>of</strong> the test. After pretreatment with naloxone i.p. the analgesia was reversed significantly, completely<br />
for the first phase <strong>and</strong> partially for the second phase <strong>of</strong> the test. Therefore, also this EO<br />
shows a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect, which supposably includes the participation <strong>of</strong><br />
opiate receptors.
Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 243<br />
Lino et al. (2005) used the EO <strong>of</strong> Ocimum micranthum Willd. (Lamiaceae) from Northeastern<br />
Brazil to study its antinociceptive activity in the hot plate <strong>and</strong> in the acetic acid-induced writhing<br />
test. Upon administration <strong>of</strong> low doses the EO could inhibit the number <strong>of</strong> writhings up to 79%. The<br />
antinociceptive effect was not influenced by pretreatment with naloxone. In the formalin test pawlicking<br />
time decreased to 61%. Also in this case the pretreatment with naloxone could not reverse<br />
the antinociceptive effect, confirming that there is no involvement <strong>of</strong> the opioid system. However,<br />
an involvement <strong>of</strong> the NO system was suggested because <strong>of</strong> the reverse <strong>of</strong> the antinociception by<br />
l-arginine in the second phase <strong>of</strong> the formalin test.<br />
Santos et al. (2005) tested the antinociceptive activity <strong>of</strong> leaf EO <strong>of</strong> the Euphorbiaceae Croton<br />
sonderianus in mice using chemical <strong>and</strong> thermal methods. After i.p. injection <strong>of</strong> acetic acid, formalin,<br />
<strong>and</strong> capsaicin the EO could provoke an inhibition <strong>of</strong> nociception. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, there was<br />
no evidence for effectivity against thermal nociception in the hot-plate test; however, the acetic acidinduced<br />
writhing <strong>and</strong> the capsaicin-induced hind-paw licking could be reduced more effectively.<br />
The antinociceptive effect in both capsaicin <strong>and</strong> formalin test was significantly antagonized by<br />
glibenclamide. These findings indicate that glibenclamide-sensitive KATP + -channels are involved<br />
in the antinociceptive effect <strong>of</strong> Croton sonderianus EO.<br />
The same author studied also the antinociceptive properties in animal experiments after oral<br />
administration <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole, a terpenoid oxide in many EOs. By pretreatment <strong>of</strong> mice with naloxone<br />
the antinociceptive effect <strong>of</strong> this bicyclic ether was not inverted in the formalin test (Santos<br />
et al., 2000).<br />
Methyleugenol, a prominent fragrance substance because <strong>of</strong> its allergenic potential, was isolated<br />
from Asiasari radix (Aristolochiaceae) <strong>and</strong> its antinociceptive effect on formalin-induced hyperalgesia<br />
in mice investigated by Yano et al. (2006). The oral administration <strong>of</strong> methyleugenol suppressed<br />
the duration <strong>of</strong> licking <strong>and</strong> biting in the second phase <strong>of</strong> the test in the same way as dicl<strong>of</strong>enac,<br />
a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Furthermore, the substance could decrease pain-related<br />
behaviors induced by intrathecal injection <strong>of</strong> NMDA, whereas dicl<strong>of</strong>enac did not influence this<br />
behavior. All these antinociceptive effects <strong>of</strong> methyleugenol were depressed by bicuculline, a<br />
g-aminobutyric acid (A) antagonist, whereas COX-1 <strong>and</strong> -2 activity was not affected. The conclusion<br />
<strong>of</strong> this study was that methyleugenol is a potent inhibitor <strong>of</strong> NMDA-receptor-mediated hyperalgesia<br />
via GABA(A) receptors.<br />
Iscan et al. (2006) analyzed the EO <strong>of</strong> the Asteraceae Achillea schischkinii Sosn. <strong>and</strong> Achillea<br />
aleppica DC. ssp. aleppica by GC <strong>and</strong> GC-MS <strong>and</strong> found as main component in both oils 1,8-cineole<br />
(32.5% <strong>and</strong> 26.1%). For testing the antinociceptive effect, male Swiss albino mice were used for the<br />
p-benzoquinone-induced abdominal constriction test. The number <strong>of</strong> abdominal contractions<br />
(writhing moments) was counted for 15 min, whereupon the antinociceptive activity was illustrated<br />
as percentage change from writhing controls. As reference drug Aspirin ® at doses <strong>of</strong> 100 <strong>and</strong><br />
200 mg/kg was used. The EO <strong>of</strong> Achillea aleppica ssp. aleppica, which was also rich in bisabolol<br />
<strong>and</strong> its derivates, could induce a significant antinociception by reducing the number <strong>of</strong> writhes. In<br />
comparison with acetylsalicylic acid the active component <strong>of</strong> Achillea aleppica ssp. aleppica was<br />
not as potent as the drug. There are a number <strong>of</strong> isolated components from both EOs, which cause<br />
an antinociceptive effect. In particular, (−)-linalool has been closely investigated. The molecular<br />
mechanisms <strong>of</strong> the antinociceptive effect are different. They can be mediated by adenosine A1 <strong>and</strong><br />
A2A or NMDA receptors, or the reduction <strong>of</strong> the NO production can play an important role. Also<br />
some can be glibenclamid-sensitive KATP + -channel dependent or influenced by the opioidergic or<br />
cholinergic system.<br />
Finally, also the antinociceptive <strong>and</strong> anti-inflammatory effects <strong>of</strong> the EO from Eremanthus<br />
erythropappus (Asteraceae) leaves were reported by a Brazilian author group. The EO proved to be<br />
significantly antinociceptive in the acetic acid-induced writhing test in mice, as well in the formalin<br />
test, <strong>and</strong> also in both phases <strong>of</strong> the paw-licking test, <strong>and</strong> in the hot-plate test. The exudate volume<br />
after intrapleural injection <strong>of</strong> carrageenan was significantly reduced as well as the leukocyte mobilization<br />
by administration <strong>of</strong> this oil 4 h before the start <strong>of</strong> the study (Sousa et al., 2008).
244 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
9.1.3 ANTIVIRAL ACTIVITIES*<br />
Besides the manifold, well-documented, <strong>and</strong>, in human <strong>and</strong> veterinary medicine, very <strong>of</strong>ten used<br />
antimicrobial <strong>and</strong> antifungal properties <strong>of</strong> nearly all EOs (see Chapter 12), this group <strong>of</strong> natural<br />
compounds also possesses distinct antiviral properties. Viruses are submicroscopic particles (ranging<br />
from 20 to 300 nm) that can infect cells <strong>of</strong> a biological organism. They replicate themselves<br />
only by infecting a host cell <strong>and</strong> cannot reproduce on their own. Unlike living organisms, viruses<br />
do not respond to changes in their environment (Hunnius, 2007). EOs are able to suppress the<br />
viruses in different ways. They can inhibit their replication or they can prevent their spread from<br />
cell to cell. In the following the antiviral activity <strong>of</strong> some EOs against different viruses such as<br />
Herpes simplex virus type 1 <strong>and</strong> type 2 (HSV-1 <strong>and</strong> HSV-2), pseudorabies virus (PrV), influenza<br />
virus A3, Junin virus (JUNV), <strong>and</strong> dengue virus type 2 (DEN-2) will be discussed. In 1999,<br />
Benencia et al. (1999) published their results on the antiviral activity <strong>of</strong> s<strong>and</strong>alwood oil (Santalum<br />
album, Santalaceae) against Herpes simplex virus type 1 <strong>and</strong> type 2. The authors found that the<br />
EO inhibited the replication <strong>of</strong> the viruses. HSV-1 was more influenced than HSV-2 dose<br />
dependently.<br />
De Logu et al. (2000) investigated the inactivation <strong>of</strong> HSV-1 <strong>and</strong> HSV-2 <strong>and</strong> the prevention <strong>of</strong><br />
cell-to-cell virus spread by the EO <strong>of</strong> the Asteraceae Santolina insularis. The plaque-reduction<br />
assay showed an IC 50 values <strong>of</strong> 0.88 mg/mL for HSV-1 <strong>and</strong> 0.7 mg/mL for HSV-2, respectively,<br />
whereas another test on Vero cells showed a cytotoxic concentration (CC 50 ) <strong>of</strong> 112 mg/mL, which<br />
leads to a CC 50 /IC 50 ratio <strong>of</strong> 127 for HSV-1 <strong>and</strong> 160 for HSV-2. These findings indicate that the<br />
antiviral effect <strong>of</strong> the EO was caused by direct virucidal effects. There was no antiviral activity<br />
detected in a postattachment assay. Due to attachment assays it was shown that virus adsorption was<br />
not reduced. Additionally, the reduction <strong>of</strong> plaque formation assay indicated that the EO reduced<br />
cell-to-cell transmission <strong>of</strong> both HSV-1 <strong>and</strong> HSV-2.<br />
Another study was made on the antiviral activity <strong>of</strong> Australian TTO <strong>and</strong> eucalyptus oil against<br />
Herpes simplex virus in cell culture by Schnitzler et al. (2001). The authors used a st<strong>and</strong>ard neutral<br />
red dye uptake assay to evaluate the cytotoxic effects <strong>of</strong> TTO <strong>and</strong> eucalyptus oil <strong>and</strong> found a moderate<br />
toxicity for RC-37 cells <strong>of</strong> both oils approaching 50% (TC 50 ) at very low concentrations. In the<br />
plaque-reduction assay an IC 50 for plaque formation <strong>of</strong> 0.0009% HSV-1 <strong>and</strong> 0.0008% HSV-2 for<br />
TTO <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> 0.009% (HSV-1) <strong>and</strong> 0.008% (HSV-2) for eucalyptus oil was determined. In a viral<br />
suspension test a very strong virucidal activity against HSV-1 <strong>and</strong> HSV-2 could be shown. TTO<br />
reduced plaque formation by 98.2% for HSV-1 <strong>and</strong> by 93.0% for HSV-2 at noncytotoxic concentrations,<br />
respectively, whereas eucalyptus oil reduced virus titers by 57.9% for HSV-1 <strong>and</strong> 75.4% for<br />
HSV-2 at noncytotoxic concentrations. Additionally, the authors investigated the mode <strong>of</strong> antiviral<br />
action <strong>of</strong> both EOs. After pretreatment <strong>of</strong> the virus prior to adsorption plaque formation was clearly<br />
inhibited. The findings show that both oils affect the virus before or during adsorption, but not after<br />
penetration into the host cell. The authors suggest the application <strong>of</strong> both oils as antiviral agents in<br />
recurrent herpes infections, although the active components are yet unknown.<br />
Farag et al. (2004) examined the chemical <strong>and</strong> biological properties <strong>of</strong> the EOs <strong>of</strong> different<br />
Melaleuca species (teatree, TTO, Myrtaceae). The authors used the EOs <strong>of</strong> the fresh leaves <strong>of</strong><br />
Melaleuca ericifolia, Melaleuca leucadendron (weepin teatree), Melaleuca armillaris, <strong>and</strong><br />
Melaleuca styphelioides. Methyl eugenol (96.8%) was the main compound <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca<br />
ericifolia, whereas 1,8-cineole (64.3%) was the major constituent <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca leucadendron. The<br />
EO <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca armillaris was rich in 1,8-cineole (33.9%) <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> terpinen-4-ol (18.8%). The main<br />
constituents <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca styphelioides were caryophyllene oxide (43.8%) followed by (−)spathulenol<br />
(9.6%). The highest virucidal effect <strong>of</strong> the EOs against HSV-1 in African green monkey kidney<br />
cells (Vero) by plaque reduction was caused by the volatile oil <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca armillaris (up to 99%),<br />
followed by that <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca leucadendron (92%) <strong>and</strong> Melaleuca ericifolia (91.5%).<br />
* Adorjan, M., 2007. Part <strong>of</strong> her master thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna.
Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 245<br />
Primo et al. (2001) examined in vitro the antiviral activity <strong>of</strong> the EO from the Lamiaceae<br />
Minthostachys verticillata (Griseb.) Epling against HSV-1 <strong>and</strong> PrV using the viral plaque-reduction<br />
assay. The EO influences HSV-1 <strong>and</strong> PrV multiplication, an activity which is attributed to the main<br />
constituents <strong>of</strong> the EO, namely menthone (39.5%) <strong>and</strong> especially pulegone (44.6%). The therapeutic<br />
index values attained 10.0 <strong>and</strong> 9.5 for HSV-1 <strong>and</strong> PrV, respectively.<br />
In a chicken embryo hemagglutination valence-reduction test, Yan et al. (2002) investigated<br />
the inhibition <strong>of</strong> influenza virus A3 by the Lamiaceae Mosla chinensis EO. The authors assessed the<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> the EO for treatment against pneumonia in experiments with mice <strong>and</strong> found that the<br />
cytopathic effect (CPE) caused by influenza virus A3 was reduced in Vero cells by this EO.<br />
The hemagglutination valence was reduced from 1:1280 to 1:20 <strong>and</strong> 1:160 at concentrations <strong>of</strong> 500,<br />
250, <strong>and</strong> 50 mg/mL in 9-day-old chicken, respectively. At a dosage <strong>of</strong> 100 mg/g/d, the therapeutic<br />
treatment <strong>of</strong> mice against pneumonia was successful.<br />
The virucidal effect <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> the Lamiaceae Mentha piperita against HSV-1 <strong>and</strong> HSV-2 was<br />
tested in vitro on RC-37 cells using a plaque-reduction assay (Schuhmacher et al., 2003). The EO<br />
showed high virucidal effects against HSV-1 <strong>and</strong> HSV-2. At concentrations that did not produce a<br />
cytotoxic effect plaque formation was significantly inhibited by 82% for HSV-1 <strong>and</strong> 92% for HSV-2,<br />
respectively. A reduction <strong>of</strong> more than 90% for both herpes viruses could be achieved at higher<br />
concentrations <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil. The authors also demonstrated that the antiviral effect depended<br />
on time. After 3 h <strong>of</strong> incubation <strong>of</strong> HSV with the EO an antiviral activity <strong>of</strong> about 99% was shown.<br />
To investigate the mechanism <strong>of</strong> antiviral action, peppermint oil was added at different times to the<br />
cells or viruses during infection. When HSV was pretreated with the EO before adsorption, both<br />
HSV types were significantly reduced. These findings demonstrate that Mentha piperita oil influences<br />
the virus before adsorption, but not after penetration into the host cell. The EO also reduces<br />
plaque formation <strong>of</strong> an acyclovir-resistant strain <strong>of</strong> HSV-1 significantly by 99%. This oil might be<br />
useful for topical application as a virucidal agent in recurrent infection, considering its lipophilic<br />
properties, which enables it to penetrate the skin.<br />
Another study as to the inhibiory effect <strong>of</strong> some EOs on HSV-1 replication in vitro was carried<br />
out by Minami et al. (2003). The best results were achieved by lemongrass, which inhibited the viral<br />
replication completely even at a concentration <strong>of</strong> 0.1%.<br />
Furthermore, Garcia et al. (2003) studied the virucidal activity against HSV-1, JUNV, <strong>and</strong> DEN-2<br />
<strong>of</strong> eight different EOs obtained from plants <strong>of</strong> San Luis Province, Argentinia. The EOs <strong>of</strong> Lippia<br />
junelliana <strong>and</strong> Lippia turbinata (Verbenaceae) exhibited the highest virucidal effect against JUNV<br />
at virucidal concentrations (VC 50 ) values from 14 to 20 ppm, whereas the EOs <strong>of</strong> Aloysia gratissima<br />
(whitebrush, Verbenaceae), Heterotheca latifolia (camphorweed, Asteraceae), <strong>and</strong> Tessaria<br />
absinthioides (tessaria, Asteraceae) reduced JUNV from 52 to 90 ppm. The virucidal activity<br />
depended on time <strong>and</strong> temperature. The EOs <strong>of</strong> Aloysia gratissima, Artemisia douglasiana (mugwort,<br />
Asteraceae), Eupatorium patens (Asteraceae), <strong>and</strong> Tessaria absinthioides inhibited HSV-1 in<br />
the range <strong>of</strong> 65–125 ppm. A discernible effect on DEN-2 infectivity could only be produced by<br />
Artemisia douglasiana <strong>and</strong> Eupatorium patens with VC 50 values <strong>of</strong> 60 <strong>and</strong> 150 ppm, respectively.<br />
The antiviral activity <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> the Lamiaceae Melissa <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L. against HSV-2 was examined<br />
by Allahverdiyev et al. (2004). The effect <strong>of</strong> the essential oil on HSV-2 replication in Hep-2 cells<br />
was tested in five different concentrations (25, 50, 100, 150, <strong>and</strong> 200 mg/mL). Up to a concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
100 mg/mL Melissa <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis oil did not cause any toxic effect to Hep-2 cells, but it was slightly<br />
toxic at concentrations over 100 mg/mL. At nontoxic concentrations the replication <strong>of</strong> HSV-2 was<br />
reduced. Recently, Schnitzler et al. (2008) confirmed these findings: The lipophilic nature <strong>of</strong> the EO<br />
<strong>of</strong> lemon balm helps to affect the virus before adsorption thus exerting a direct antiviral effect. After<br />
the pene tration <strong>of</strong> the herpes virus into the host cell there was no affection recorded anymore.<br />
Yang et al. (2005) studied the anti-influenza virus activities <strong>of</strong> the volatile oil from the roots <strong>of</strong><br />
the Asclepiadaceae Cynanchum stauntonii <strong>and</strong> found that the volatile oil caused an antiviral effect<br />
against influenza virus in vitro <strong>and</strong> also in in vivo experiments <strong>and</strong> was able to prevent the number<br />
<strong>of</strong> deaths induced by the virus in a dose-dependent manner.
246 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Another study was carried out on the liposomal incorporation <strong>of</strong> Artemisia arborescens L.<br />
(powis castle, Asteraceae) EO <strong>and</strong> its in vitro antiviral activity by Sinico et al. (2005). The antiviral<br />
effect was tested against HSV-1 by a quantitative tetrazolium-based colorimetric method. The<br />
authors found that the EO can be incorporated in good amounts in vesicular dispersions <strong>and</strong> that<br />
these vesicle dispersions were stable for at least 6 months. During this period neither oil leakage nor<br />
vesicle size alteration occurred <strong>and</strong> even after a year <strong>of</strong> storage oil retention was still good, but<br />
vesicle fusion was present. The best antiviral results were observed when vesicles were made with<br />
P90H (= hydrogenated (P90H) soy phosphatidyl-choline).<br />
An evaluation <strong>of</strong> antiviral properties <strong>of</strong> various EOs from South American plants was carried out<br />
by Duschatzky et al. (2005). The authors assessed the cytotoxicity <strong>and</strong> in vitro inhibitory activity <strong>of</strong><br />
the EOs against HSV-1, DENV-2, <strong>and</strong> JUNV by a virucidal test. The best results were observed<br />
with the EOs <strong>of</strong> Heterothalamus alienus (Asteraceae) <strong>and</strong> Buddleja cordobensis (Scrophulariaceae)<br />
against JUNV, with virucidal concentration 50% (VC 50 ) values <strong>of</strong> 44.2 <strong>and</strong> 39.0 ppm <strong>and</strong> therapeutic<br />
indices (cytotoxicity to virucidal action ratio) <strong>of</strong> 3.3 <strong>and</strong> 4.0, respectively. The oils caused the<br />
inhibitory effect interacting directly with the virions.<br />
Reichling et al. (2005) investigated the virucidal activity <strong>of</strong> a b-triketone-rich EO <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Myrtaceae Leptospermum scoparium (manuka oil) against HSV-1 <strong>and</strong> HSV-2 in vitro on RC-37<br />
cells (monkey kidney cells) using a plaque-reduction assay. The addition <strong>of</strong> the oil to the cells or<br />
viruses at different times during the infection cycle made it possible to determine the mode <strong>of</strong> the<br />
antiviral action. After pretreatment with manuka oil 1 h before cell infection both virus types were<br />
significantly inhibited. At concentrations that were not cytotoxic, the plaque formation reduction<br />
reached levels <strong>of</strong> 99.5% for HSV-1 <strong>and</strong> 98.9% for HSV-2. The IC 50 <strong>of</strong> the EO for virus plaque formation<br />
was 0.0001% V/V (= 0.96 mg/mL) for HSV-1 <strong>and</strong> 0.00006% V/V (= 0.58 mg/mL) for HSV-2.<br />
When the host cells were pretreated before viral infection, plaque formation could not be influenced.<br />
After the virus penetrated the host cells only the replication <strong>of</strong> HSV-1 particle was significantly<br />
reduced to about 41% by manuka oil.<br />
A phytochemical analysis <strong>and</strong> in vitro evaluation <strong>of</strong> the biological activity against HSV-1 <strong>of</strong><br />
Cedrus libani A. Rich. (cedar <strong>of</strong> libanon, Pinaceae) was made by Loizzo et al. (2008a). The authors<br />
identified the active constituents for the in vitro antiviral activity against HSV-1 <strong>and</strong> evaluated the<br />
cytotoxic effects in Vero cells. The IC 50 values <strong>of</strong> cones <strong>and</strong> leaves extract were 0.50 <strong>and</strong> 0.66 mg/ mL,<br />
respectively, without provoking a cytotoxic effect, whereas the EO showed a comparable activity<br />
with an IC 50 value <strong>of</strong> 0.44 mg/mL. In another study the author group found that the EO <strong>of</strong> Laurus<br />
nobilis (Lauraceae) <strong>and</strong> Thuja orientalis (Cupressaceae) were very effective against SARScoronavirus<br />
(IC 50 : 120 ± 1.2 mg/mL, resp. 130 ± 0.4 mg/mL) <strong>and</strong> against Herpes simplex virus type<br />
1 (IC 50 : 60 + 0.5 mg/mL, resp. > 1000 mg/mL) (Loizzo et al., 2008b).<br />
Ryabchenko et al. (2007, 2008) presented a study that dealt with antitumor, antiviral, <strong>and</strong> cytotoxic<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> some single fragrance compounds. The antiviral properties were investigated in an<br />
in vitro plaque formation test in 3T6 cells against mouse polyoma virus. Natural <strong>and</strong> synthetic nerolidol<br />
showed the highest inhibitory activity, followed by trans,trans-farnesol <strong>and</strong> longifolene.<br />
9.1.4 ANTIPHLOGISTIC ACTIVITY*<br />
Processes by which the body reacts to injuries or infections are called inflammations. There are<br />
several inflammatory mediators such as the tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a); interleukin (IL)-1b,<br />
IL-8, IL-10; <strong>and</strong> the PGE2. In the following the inhibitory effects <strong>of</strong> some EOs on the expression <strong>of</strong><br />
these inflammatory mediators <strong>and</strong> on other reasons for inflammations will be shown. Shinde et al.<br />
(1999) performed studies on the anti-inflammatory <strong>and</strong> analgesic activity <strong>of</strong> the Pinaceae Cedrus<br />
deodara (Roxb.) Loud. (deodar cedar, Pinaceae) wood oil. They examined the volatile oil obtained<br />
by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the wood <strong>of</strong> this Cedrus species for its anti-inflammatory <strong>and</strong> analgesic<br />
* Adorjan, M., 2007. Part <strong>of</strong> her master thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna.
Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 247<br />
effect at doses <strong>of</strong> 50 <strong>and</strong> 100 mg/kg body weight <strong>and</strong> observed a significant inhibition <strong>of</strong> carrageenin-induced<br />
rat paw edema. At doses <strong>of</strong> 100 mg/kg body weight both exudative–proliferative<br />
<strong>and</strong> chronic phases <strong>of</strong> inflammation in adjuvant arthritic rats were reduced. In acetic acid-induced<br />
writhing <strong>and</strong> also in hot-plate test both tested doses exhibited an analgesic effect in mice.<br />
The anti-inflammatory-related activity <strong>of</strong> EOs from the leaves <strong>and</strong> resin <strong>of</strong> species <strong>of</strong> Protium<br />
(Burseraceae), which are commonly used in folk medicine, was evaluated by Siani et al. (1999). The<br />
resin oil contains mainly monoterpenes <strong>and</strong> phenylpropanoids: a-terpinolene (22%), p-cymene<br />
(11%), p-cimen-8-ol (11%), limonene (5%), <strong>and</strong> dillapiol (16%), whereas the leaves dominantly comprise<br />
sesquiterpenes. The authors tested the resin <strong>of</strong> Protium heptaphyllum (PHP) <strong>and</strong> the leaves <strong>of</strong><br />
Protium strumosum (PS), Protium gr<strong>and</strong>ifolium (PG), Protium lewellyni (PL), <strong>and</strong> Protium<br />
hebetatum (PHT) for their anti-inflammatory effect using a mouse pleurisy model induced by<br />
zymosan <strong>and</strong> LPS. In addition, they screened the plants for their NO production from stimulated<br />
macrophages <strong>and</strong> for the proliferation <strong>of</strong> neoplastic cell lines: Neuro-2a (mouse neuroblastoma),<br />
SP2/0 (mouse plasmocytoma), <strong>and</strong> J774 (mouse monocytic cell line). After administration <strong>of</strong><br />
100 mg/kg p.o. 1 h before stimulation with zymosan, an inhibition <strong>of</strong> protein extravasation could be<br />
observed with the oils from PHP, PS, <strong>and</strong> PL, whereas total or different leukocyte counts could not<br />
be reduced. Also the neutrophilic accumulation could be decreased by the oils from PG, PL, <strong>and</strong><br />
PHT, while PHP <strong>and</strong> especially PL lead to a reduction <strong>of</strong> LPS-induced eosinophilic accumulation<br />
in mouse pleural cavity. PHT also showed the ability to inhibit the mononuclear accumulation.<br />
The NO production from stimulated mouse macrophages could be changed by in vitro treatment<br />
with the EOs. A reduction <strong>of</strong> the LPS-induced NO production <strong>of</strong> 74% was achieved by PHP <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
46% by PS. On the contrary, PL caused an increase <strong>of</strong> 49% in NO production. Concerning the cellline<br />
proliferation, Neuro-2a was affected in the range <strong>of</strong> 60–100%, SP2/0 <strong>of</strong> 65–95%, <strong>and</strong> J774 <strong>of</strong><br />
70–90%. As to the suggestion <strong>of</strong> the authors, these EOs could be used as efficient pharmacological<br />
tools.<br />
Another study was made on the anti-inflammatory effect in rodents <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> the Euphorbiaceae<br />
Croton cajucara Benth. (Sacaca, Euphorbiaceae) by Bighetti et al. (1999). At a dose <strong>of</strong><br />
100 mg/kg the EO exerted an anti-inflammatory effect in animal models <strong>of</strong> acute (carrageenininduced<br />
paw edema in mice) <strong>and</strong> chronic (cotton pellet granuloma) inflammation. Compared with<br />
the negative control a dose-dependent reduction <strong>of</strong> carrageenin-induced edema was achieved. This<br />
EO also reduced chronic inflammation by 38%, whereas dicl<strong>of</strong>enac only achieved an inhibition <strong>of</strong><br />
36%. The migration <strong>of</strong> neutrophils into the peritoneal cavity could not be inhibited by the EO. The<br />
anti-inflammatory effect seemed to be related to the inhibition <strong>of</strong> COX.<br />
Santos et al. (2000) investigated the anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole, a terpenoid oxide<br />
present in many plant EOs. Inflammation could be reduced in some animal models, that is, paw<br />
edema induced by carrageenin <strong>and</strong> cotton pellet-induced granuloma. This effect was caused at an<br />
oral dose range <strong>of</strong> 100–400 mg/kg. The authors suggest a potentially beneficial use in therapy as an<br />
anti-inflammatory <strong>and</strong> analgesic agent.<br />
The anti-inflammatory effect <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> the Myrtaceae Melaleuca alternifolia (TTO) was<br />
evaluated by Hart et al. (2000). The authors tested the ability <strong>of</strong> TTO to inhibit the production <strong>of</strong><br />
inflammatory mediators such as the TNF-a, IL-1b, IL-8, IL-10, <strong>and</strong> the PGE2 by LPS-activated<br />
human peripheral blood monocytes. A toxic effect on monocytes was achieved at a concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
0.016% vol/vol by TTO emulsified by sonication in a glass tube into culture medium containing<br />
10% fetal calf serum (FCS). In addition, a significant suppression <strong>of</strong> LPS-induced production <strong>of</strong><br />
TNF-a, IL-1b <strong>and</strong> IL-10 (by approximately 50%), <strong>and</strong> PGE2 (by approximately 30%) after 40 h<br />
could be observed with the water-soluble components <strong>of</strong> TTO at a concentration equivalent to<br />
0.125%. The main constituents <strong>of</strong> this EO were terpinen-4-ol (42%), a-terpineol (3%), <strong>and</strong> 1,8-cineole<br />
(2%). When tested individually, only terpinen-4-ol inhibited the production <strong>of</strong> the inflammatory<br />
mediators after 40 h.<br />
The mechanisms involved in the anti-inflammatory action <strong>of</strong> inhaled TTO in mice were investigated<br />
by Golab et al. (2007). The authors used sexually mature, 6–8-week-old, C57BI10 × CBA/H
248 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
(F1) male mice <strong>and</strong> divided them into two groups. One group was injected i.p. with zymosan to<br />
induce peritoneal inflammation <strong>and</strong> the other simultaneously with antalarmin, a CRH-1 receptor<br />
antagonist, to block hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis function. After 24 h <strong>of</strong> injection<br />
the mice were killed by CO 2 asphyxia, <strong>and</strong> the peritoneal leukocytes (PTLs) isolated <strong>and</strong> counted.<br />
Additionally, the levels <strong>of</strong> ROS <strong>and</strong> COX activity were detected in PTLs by fluorometric <strong>and</strong> colorimetric<br />
assays, respectively. The result was that TTO inhalation led to a strong anti-inflammatory<br />
effect on the immune system stimulated by zymosan injection, whereas PTL number, ROS level,<br />
<strong>and</strong> COX activity in mice without inflammation were not affected. The HPA axis was shown to play<br />
an important role in the anti-inflammatory effect <strong>of</strong> TTO <strong>and</strong> antalarmin was observed to abolish<br />
the influence <strong>of</strong> inhaled TTO on PTL number <strong>and</strong> their ROS expression in mice with experimental<br />
peritonitis. In mice without inflammation these parameters were not affected.<br />
A further study was made on the anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> linalool <strong>and</strong> linalyl acetate constituents<br />
<strong>of</strong> many EOs by Peana et al. (2002). The authors evaluated the anti-inflammatory effect <strong>of</strong><br />
(−)-linalool, that is, the naturally occurring enantiomer, <strong>and</strong> its racemate form, present in various<br />
amounts in distilled or extracted EOs. Due to the fact that in linalool-containing oils there is also<br />
linalyl acetate present, this monoterpene ester was also tested for its anti-inflammatory activity.<br />
Both the pure enantiomer <strong>and</strong> its racemate caused a reduction <strong>of</strong> edema after systemic administration<br />
in carrageenin-induced rat paw edema test. Better results could be observed with the pure<br />
enantiomer, which elicited a delayed <strong>and</strong> more prolonged effect at a dose <strong>of</strong> 25 mg/kg, whereas the<br />
efficiency <strong>of</strong> the racemate form lasted only for 1 h after carrageenin administration. At higher doses,<br />
there were no differences between the (−) enantiomer <strong>and</strong> the racemate <strong>and</strong> there could be achieved<br />
no increase <strong>of</strong> the effect with increasing the dose. Equimolar doses <strong>of</strong> linalyl acetate on local edema<br />
did not provoke the same effect as the corresponding alcohol. These results demonstrate a typical<br />
prodrug behavior <strong>of</strong> linaly acetate.<br />
Salasia et al. (2002) examined the anti-inflammatory effect <strong>of</strong> cinnamyl tiglate contained in the<br />
volatile oil <strong>of</strong> kunyit (Curcuma domestica Val.; Zingiberaceae) on carrageenin-induced inflammation<br />
in Wistar albino rats (Rattus norvegicus). Cinnamyl tiglate was found in the second fraction <strong>of</strong><br />
the volatile oil at a concentration <strong>of</strong> 63.6%. After induction <strong>of</strong> an inflammation in rats by injection<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1% carrageenin <strong>and</strong> administration <strong>of</strong> cinnamyl tiglate orally at various doses (control group<br />
treated with aspirin) <strong>and</strong> the EO a plethysmograph measured the degree <strong>of</strong> inflammation: At a dose<br />
<strong>of</strong> 17.6% <strong>of</strong> the volatile oil <strong>of</strong> kunyit/kg body weight the highest anti-inflammatory effect could be<br />
observed (p ≤ 0.01), followed by the effect <strong>of</strong> a dose <strong>of</strong> 4.4%/kg body weight (p ≤ 0.05). At lower<br />
doses the inflammation could not be reduced (p ≥ 0.05).<br />
The in vitro anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> the EO from the Caryophyllaceae Ligularia fi scheri var.<br />
spiciformis (ligularia) in murine macrophage RAW 264.7 cells was evaluated by Kim et al. (2002).<br />
They examined the effects <strong>of</strong> the EOs isolated from various plants on LPS-induced release <strong>of</strong> NO,<br />
PGE2, <strong>and</strong> TNF-a by the macrophage RAW 264.7 cells. The EO <strong>of</strong> Ligularia fi scheri var. spiciformis<br />
achieved the best results among the tested oils inhibiting significantly the LPS-induced generation <strong>of</strong><br />
NO, PGE2, <strong>and</strong> TNF-a in RAW 264.7 cells. Additionally, the EO reduced the expression <strong>of</strong> iNOS <strong>and</strong><br />
COX-2 enzyme in a dose-dependent manner. Therefore, the mechanism <strong>of</strong> the anti-inflammatory<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> this EO is the suppression <strong>of</strong> the release <strong>of</strong> iNOS, COX-2 expression, <strong>and</strong> TNF-a.<br />
The in vitro anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> the Asteraceae Chrysanthemum sibiricum<br />
in murine macrophage RAW 264.7 cells was evaluated by Lee et al. (2003). The aim was to study<br />
the effect not only on the formation <strong>of</strong> NO, PGE2, <strong>and</strong> TNF-a, but also on iNOS <strong>and</strong> COX-2 in<br />
LPS-induced murine macrophage RAW 264.7 cells. The EO had a similar effect on both enzymes<br />
<strong>and</strong> the inhibitory effects were concentration dependent. Additionally, the volatile oil also furnished<br />
a reduction <strong>of</strong> the formation <strong>of</strong> TNF-a.<br />
An evaluation <strong>of</strong> the anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> the EOs from the Asteraceae Porophyllum<br />
ruderale (PR) (yerba porosa) <strong>and</strong> Conyza bonariensis (CB) (asthmaweed) in a mouse model <strong>of</strong><br />
pleurisy induced by zymosan <strong>and</strong> LPS was made by Souza et al. (2003). The activity <strong>of</strong> the main<br />
compounds <strong>of</strong> each oil, b-mycrene (in PR), <strong>and</strong> limonene (in CB) in the LPS-induced pleurisy
Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 249<br />
model as well as the immunoregulatory activity was examined by measurement <strong>of</strong> the inhibition <strong>of</strong><br />
NO <strong>and</strong> production <strong>of</strong> the cytokines, g-interferon, <strong>and</strong> IL-4. After oral administration <strong>of</strong> the oils, a<br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> the LPS-induced inflammation including cell migration could be observed. A similar<br />
effect could be provoked with the use <strong>of</strong> limonene alone. Pure b-mycrene <strong>and</strong> limonene were also<br />
able to reduce the production <strong>of</strong> NO at not cytotoxic doses. In addition, b-myrcene <strong>and</strong> limonene<br />
also inhibited significantly g-interferon.<br />
The anti-inflammatory effect <strong>of</strong> the leaf EO <strong>of</strong> the Lauraceae Laurus nobilis Linn. (sweet bay) in<br />
mice <strong>and</strong> rats was investigated by Sayyah et al. (2003). A dose-dependent anti-inflammatory effect<br />
could be observed in the formalin-induced edema test, which could be compared with the effect <strong>of</strong><br />
nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs such as piroxicam.<br />
Silva et al. (2003) examined the anti-inflammatory effect <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> three species <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Myrtaceae Eucalyptus citriodora (EC, lemon eucalyptus), Eucalyptus tereticornis (ET, forest red<br />
gum), <strong>and</strong> Eucalyptus globulus (EG, blue gum eucalyptus), from which many species are used in<br />
Brazilian folk medicine to treat various diseases such as cold, flu, fever, <strong>and</strong> bronchial infections.<br />
An inhibition <strong>of</strong> rat paw edema induced by carrageenan <strong>and</strong> dextran, neutrophil migration into rat<br />
peritoneal cavities induced by carrageenan <strong>and</strong> vascular permeability induced by carrageenan <strong>and</strong><br />
histamine could be observed. But there were no consistent results obtained for parameters as activity<br />
<strong>and</strong> dose–response relationship, which demonstrates the complex nature <strong>of</strong> the oil <strong>and</strong> the assays<br />
used. However, these findings provide support for the traditional use <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus in Brazilian folk<br />
medicine <strong>and</strong> further investigations should be made in order to develop possibly new classes <strong>of</strong> antiinflammatory<br />
drugs from components <strong>of</strong> the EOs <strong>of</strong> the Eucalyptus species.<br />
The anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> the EOs <strong>of</strong> Ocimum gratissimum (African brasil, Lamiaceae),<br />
Eucalyptus citriodora (lemon eucalyptus, Myrtaceae), <strong>and</strong> Cymbopogon giganteus (Poaceae) was<br />
evaluated by Sahouo et al. (2003). The authors tested the inhibitory effect <strong>of</strong> the three plants in vitro<br />
on soybean lipoxygenase L-1 <strong>and</strong> COX function <strong>of</strong> prostagl<strong>and</strong>in H synthetase. The two enzymes<br />
play an important role in the production <strong>of</strong> inflammatory mediators. The EO <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus citriodora<br />
evidently suppressed L-1 with an IC 50 value <strong>of</strong> 72 mg/mL. Both enzymes were inhibited by only one<br />
EO that <strong>of</strong> Ocimum gratissimum with IC 50 values <strong>of</strong> 125 mg/mL for COX function <strong>of</strong> PGHS <strong>and</strong><br />
144 mg/mL for L-1, respectively, whereas the oils <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus citriodora <strong>and</strong> Cymbopogon<br />
giganteus did not affect the COX.<br />
Lourens et al. (2004) evaluated the in vitro biological activity <strong>and</strong> chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the<br />
EOs <strong>of</strong> four indigenous South African Helichrysum species (Asteraceae), such as Helichrysum<br />
dasyanthum, Helichrysum felinum (strawberry everlasting), Helichrysum excisum, <strong>and</strong> Helichrysum<br />
petiolare (licorice plant). An interesting anti-inflammatory effect could be observed in the lipooxygenase-5<br />
assay at doses between 25 <strong>and</strong> 32 mg/mL. Analysis <strong>of</strong> the chemical composition showed<br />
that the EOs comprise mainly monoterpenes such as a-pinene, 1,8-cineole, <strong>and</strong> p-cymene, only the<br />
oil <strong>of</strong> Helichrysum felinum was dominated by sesquiterpenes in low concentrations with b-caryophyllene<br />
as main compound on top.<br />
The composition <strong>and</strong> in vitro anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> South African Vitex species<br />
(Verbenaceae), such as Vitex pooara (waterberg poora-berry), Vitex rehmanni (pipe-stem tree),<br />
Vitex obovata ssp. obovata (hairy fingerleaf), V. obovata ssp. wilmsii, <strong>and</strong> Vitex zeyheri (silver pipestem<br />
tree), were analyzed by Nyiligira et al. (2004). After determination <strong>of</strong> the composition <strong>of</strong> the<br />
EOs by GC-MS their in vitro anti-inflammatory activity was investigated in a 5-lipoxygenase assay.<br />
All EOs effectively suppressed 5-lipoxygenase, which plays an important role in the inflammatory<br />
cascade. The best results were achieved by V. pooara with an IC 50 value <strong>of</strong> 25 ppm. The use <strong>of</strong> the<br />
EO data matrix presents chemotaxonomic evidence, which supports infrageneric placement <strong>of</strong><br />
V. pooara in subgenus Vitex, whereas the other four species are placed in subgenus Holmskiodiopsis.<br />
Ganapaty et al. (2004) examined the composition <strong>and</strong> anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Geraniaceae Pelargonium graveolens (rose geranium) EO. Citronellol, geranyl acetate, geraniol,<br />
citronellyl formate, <strong>and</strong> linalool were identified in the leaf oil by GC-MS. A significant antiinflammatory<br />
effect could be observed in the carrageenan-induced rat paw edema test.
250 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Another study was made on the in vitro anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> paeonol from the EO <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Paeoniaceae Paeonia moutan (tree peony) <strong>and</strong> its derivate methylpaeonol by Park et al. (2005). The<br />
authors isolated paeonol (2-hydroxy-5-methoxyacetophenone) by silica gel column chromatography<br />
<strong>and</strong> methylated it by dimethylsulfate to yield methylpaeonol (2,5-di-O-methylacetophenone). A suppression<br />
<strong>of</strong> the NO formation in LPS-induced macrophage RAW 264.7 cells was observed with both<br />
compounds in nitrite assay. Additionally, a reduction <strong>of</strong> iNOS-synthase <strong>and</strong> COX-2 formation was<br />
achieved in the Western blotting assay. These findings demonstrate that paeonol is partly responsible<br />
for the anti-inflammatory effect <strong>of</strong> Paeonia moutan <strong>and</strong> that synthesized derivates are promising<br />
c<strong>and</strong>idates for new anti-inflammatory agents.<br />
The anti-inflammatory effect <strong>of</strong> the EO from the leaves <strong>of</strong> indigenous Cinnamomum osmophloeum<br />
Kaneh. (camphor tree, Lauraceae) was studied by Chao et al. (2005). Twenty-one components,<br />
among which the monoterpenes 1,8-cineole (17%) <strong>and</strong> santolina triene (14.2%) <strong>and</strong> the sesquiterpenes<br />
spathulenol (15.7%) <strong>and</strong> caryophyllene oxide (11.2%), were analyzed as main constituents. In<br />
the anti-inflammatory assay it was found that the EO exerted a high capacity to suppress pro-IL-1b<br />
protein expression induced by LPS-treated J774A.1 murine macrophage at dosages <strong>of</strong> 60 mg/mL.<br />
Additionally, IL-1b <strong>and</strong> IL-6 production was reduced at the same dose. The TNF-a production<br />
could not be influenced by this dose <strong>of</strong> the EO.<br />
A further study was carried out on the anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> the EO from Casaeria sylvestris<br />
Sw. (wild c<strong>of</strong>fee, Flacourtiaceae) by Esteves et al. (2005). The EO having a total yield <strong>of</strong> 2.5% showed<br />
a LD 50 <strong>of</strong> 1100 mg/kg in mouse. Its composition was analyzed by GC <strong>and</strong> mainly sesquiterpenes, such<br />
as caryophyllene, thujopsene, a-humulene, b-acoradiene, germacrene-D, bicyclogermacrene, calamenene,<br />
germacrene B, spathulenol, <strong>and</strong> globulol identified as main compounds. After oral administration<br />
<strong>of</strong> this EO to rats, a reduction by 36% in carrageenan-induced edema was achieved in the rat assay<br />
(p < 0.05, Student’s t-test). In rat paw edema dextran-induced <strong>and</strong> vascular permeability assay using<br />
histamine, no significant result could be observed. Additionally, the writhing test using acetic acid<br />
demonstrated an inhibition <strong>of</strong> writhes with the EO by 58% <strong>and</strong> with indomethacin by 56%.<br />
Ramos et al. (2006) investigated the anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> EOs from five different<br />
Myrtaceae species, Eugenia brasiliensis (grumichama), Eugenia involucrate, Eugenia jambolana,<br />
Psidium guajava (guava), <strong>and</strong> Psidium widgrenianum. The oils were obtained by steam distillation<br />
<strong>and</strong> analyzed by GC-MS <strong>and</strong> the correlation <strong>of</strong> retention indexes. In Eugenia brasiliensis,<br />
Eugenia involucrate, <strong>and</strong> Psidium guajava mainly sesquiterpenes could be identified, whereas<br />
monoterpenes dominated in Psidium widgrenianum <strong>and</strong> Eugenia jambolana. Afterwards the<br />
volatile compounds in zymosan <strong>and</strong> LPS-induced inflammatory models were tested. In zymosaninduced<br />
pleurisy, no reduction <strong>of</strong> leukocyte accumulation or protein leakage could be observed<br />
after p.o. administration <strong>of</strong> up to 100 mg/kg. Eugenia jambolana suppressed the total leukocyte<br />
(up to 56%) <strong>and</strong> eosinophil (up to 74%) migration in LPS-induced pleurisy, but the response did<br />
not correlate with the dose. Psidium widgrenianum only inhibited eosinophil migration (up to<br />
70%) <strong>and</strong> both Eugenia jambolana <strong>and</strong> Psidium widgrenianum were also tested in vitro for<br />
their inhibitory effect on the production <strong>of</strong> NO. A potent suppression was achieved by Eugenia<br />
jambolana (up to 100%) in a dose-dependent manner, whereas only a moderate effect could<br />
be observed with Psidium widgrenianum (51%) test at concentrations below cytotoxic activity<br />
(25 mg/well).<br />
The anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> the Myrtaceae Eugenia caryophyllata (clove) EO was evaluated<br />
in an animal model by Ozturk et al. (2005). The chemical composition <strong>of</strong> this EO by GC<br />
yielded b-caryophyllene (44.7%), eugenol (44.2%), a-humulene (3.5%), eugenyl acetate (1.3%), <strong>and</strong><br />
a-copaene (1.0%) as main constituents. Then the volumes <strong>of</strong> the right hind paws <strong>of</strong> rats were measured<br />
with a plethysmometer in eight groups: physiological serum, ethylalcohol, indomethacin<br />
(3 mg/kg), etodolac (50 mg/kg), cardamom (0.05 ml/kg), EC-I (0.025 ml/kg), EC-II (0.050 ml/kg),<br />
EC-III (0.100 ml/kg), <strong>and</strong> EC-IV (0.200 ml/kg). Afterwards the drugs were injected i.p. <strong>and</strong><br />
g-carrageenan s.c. into the plantar regions <strong>and</strong> the difference <strong>of</strong> the volumes determined after 3 h.<br />
A reduction <strong>of</strong> the inflammation by 95.7% could be observed with indomethacin, to a lesser extent
Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 251<br />
by the other seven groups (Table 9.1). The result <strong>of</strong> the study was that the EO <strong>of</strong> Eugenia caryophyllata<br />
exerted a remarkable anti-inflammatory effect.<br />
Alitonou et al. (2006) investigated the EO <strong>of</strong> Poaceae Cymbopogon giganteus, widely used<br />
in traditional medicine against several diseases, from Benin for its potential use as an anti-inflammatory<br />
agent. The analysis <strong>of</strong> this EO furnished trans-p-1(7),8-menthadien-2-ol (22.3%), cis-p-1-<br />
(7),8-menthadien-2-ol (19.9%), trans-p-2,8-menthadien-1-ol (14.3%), <strong>and</strong> cis-p-2,8-menthadien-1-ol<br />
(10.1%) as main components. Additionally, it was found that the leaf EO suppressed the 5-lipoxygenase<br />
in vitro. Moreover, the antiradical scavenging activity was measured by the 1,1-diphenyl-2-<br />
picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) method (as to this property see Section 9.1.6).<br />
A further study was carried out on the anti-inflammatory effect <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> Iranian black cumin<br />
seeds (BCS) (N. sativa L.; Ranunculaceae) by Hajhashemi et al. (2004). p-Cymene (37.3%) <strong>and</strong><br />
thymoquinone (13.7%) were found to be the main compounds. For the detection <strong>of</strong> the anti-inflammatory<br />
activity, carrageenan-induced paw edema test in rats was used <strong>and</strong> also the croton oilinduced<br />
ear edema in mice. After oral administration <strong>of</strong> this EO at various doses no significant<br />
anti-inflammatory effect could be observed in the carrageenan test, whereas i.p. injection <strong>of</strong> the<br />
same doses significantly reduced carrageenan-induced paw edema. At doses <strong>of</strong> 10 <strong>and</strong> 20 mL/ear,<br />
BCS-EO also caused a reduction <strong>of</strong> a croton oil-induced edema. An anti-inflammatory effect could<br />
be observed after both systemic <strong>and</strong> local administration <strong>and</strong> thymoquinone seemed to play an<br />
important role in this pharmacological effect.<br />
The downregulation <strong>of</strong> the leukotriene biosynthesis by thymoquinone, the active compound <strong>of</strong><br />
the EO <strong>of</strong> the Ranunculaceae N. sativa, <strong>and</strong> its influence on airway inflammation in a mouse model<br />
was examined by El Gazzar et al. (2006). Bronchial asthma is <strong>of</strong>ten caused by chronic airway<br />
inflammation <strong>and</strong> leukotrienes are potent inflammatory mediators. Their levels arose in the air passages<br />
when an allergen challenge has been going on. The authors sensitize mice <strong>and</strong> challenged<br />
them with ovalbumin (OVA) antigen, which led to an increase <strong>of</strong> leukotrien B4 <strong>and</strong> C4, Th2 cytokines,<br />
<strong>and</strong> eosinophils in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid. Additionally, lung tissue eosinophilia<br />
<strong>and</strong> nose goblet cells were remarkably elevated. After administration <strong>of</strong> thymoquinone before OVA<br />
challenge, 5-lipoxygenase expression by lung cells was suppressed <strong>and</strong> therefore the levels <strong>of</strong> LTB4<br />
<strong>and</strong> LTC4 were reduced. A reduction <strong>of</strong> Th2 cytokines <strong>and</strong> BAL fluid <strong>and</strong> lung tissue eosinophilia,<br />
all parameters <strong>of</strong> airway inflammation, could also be observed. These findings demonstrate the<br />
anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> thymoquinone in experimental asthma.<br />
Also El Mezayen et al. (2006) studied the effect <strong>of</strong> thymoquinone, the major constituent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
EO <strong>of</strong> N. sativa seeds, on COX expression <strong>and</strong> prostagl<strong>and</strong>in production in a mouse model <strong>of</strong> allergic<br />
airway inflammation. Prostagl<strong>and</strong>ins play an important role in modulating the inflammatory<br />
responses in a number <strong>of</strong> conditions, including allergic airway inflammation. They are formed<br />
through arachidonic acid metabolism by COX-1 <strong>and</strong> -2 in response to various stimuli. The authors<br />
sensitized mice <strong>and</strong> challenged them through the air passage with OVA, which caused a significant<br />
TABLE 9.1<br />
Reduction <strong>of</strong> Inflammation by the EO <strong>of</strong> Eugenia caryophyllata<br />
(EC), Indomethacin, <strong>and</strong> Etodolac in Animal Model<br />
Reduction <strong>of</strong> Inflammation (%)<br />
Indomethacin (3 mg/kg) 95.7<br />
Etodolac (50 mg/kg) 43.4<br />
EC-I (0.025 mL/kg) 46.5<br />
EC-II (0.050 mL/kg) 90.2<br />
EC-III (0.100 mL/kg) 66.9<br />
EC-IV (0.200 mL/kg) 82.8
252 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
elevation <strong>of</strong> the PGD2 <strong>and</strong> PGE2 expression in the airways. Additionally, inflammatory nose cells<br />
<strong>and</strong> Th2 cytokine levels in the BAL fluid, lung airway eosinophilia, <strong>and</strong> goblet cell hyperplasia were<br />
raised <strong>and</strong> the COX-2-protein expression in the lung was induced. After i.p. injection <strong>of</strong> thymoquinone<br />
for 5 days before the first OVA challenge a significant decrease in Th2 cytokines, lung eosinophilia,<br />
<strong>and</strong> goblet cell hyperplasia could be observed, which was caused by the suppression <strong>of</strong><br />
COX-2 protein expression <strong>and</strong> a reduction <strong>of</strong> the PGD2 production. Thymoquinone also slightly<br />
inhibited the COX-1 expression <strong>and</strong> the production <strong>of</strong> PGE2. This time the results demonstrated the<br />
anti-inflammatory effect <strong>of</strong> thymoquinone during the allergic response in the lung caused by the<br />
suppression <strong>of</strong> PGD2 synthesis <strong>and</strong> Th2-driven immune response.<br />
The effect <strong>of</strong> thymoquinone from the volatile oil <strong>of</strong> black cumin on rheumatoid arthritis in rat<br />
models was investigated by Tekeoglu et al. (2006). Arthritis was induced in rats by Freund’s incomplete<br />
adjuvant <strong>and</strong> the rats were divided into five groups: controls 0.9% NaCl (n = 7), 2.5 mg/kg<br />
thymoquinone (n = 7), 5 mg/kg thymoquinone (n = 7), Bacilli Chalmette Guerin (BCG) 6 × 105 CFU<br />
(n = 7), <strong>and</strong> MTX 0.3 mg/kg (n = 7). The level <strong>of</strong> inflammation was characterized by radiological<br />
<strong>and</strong> visual signs on the claw <strong>and</strong> by TNF-a <strong>and</strong> IL-1b expression <strong>and</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> the different<br />
groups were compared. Thymoquinone reduced adjuvant-induced arthritis in rats, which was confirmed<br />
clinically <strong>and</strong> radiologically.<br />
Biochemical <strong>and</strong> histopathological evidences for beneficial effects <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> the Lamiaceae<br />
Satureja khuzestanica Jamzad, an endemic Iranian plant, on the mouse model <strong>of</strong> inflammatory<br />
bowel diseases were found by Ghazanfari et al. (2006). The EO was tested on the experimental<br />
mouse model <strong>of</strong> inflammatory bowel disease, which is acetic acid-induced colitis <strong>and</strong> used prednisolone<br />
as control. For best results, also biochemical, macro- <strong>and</strong> microscopic examinations <strong>of</strong> the<br />
colon were performed. In acetic acid-treated mice a significant increase <strong>of</strong> lipid peroxidation could<br />
be observed compared to the control group, which was significantly restored by treatment with the<br />
EO <strong>and</strong> prednisolone. The EO decreased the lipid peroxidation up to 42.8% dose dependently,<br />
whereas prednisolone caused a decrease <strong>of</strong> 33.3%. Also a significant increase <strong>of</strong> the myeloperoxidase<br />
activity could be observed compared to the control group in acetic acid-treated mice, which<br />
was also significantly restored by treatment with the EO <strong>and</strong> prednisolone. The EO lowered the<br />
myeloperoxidase activity by 25% <strong>and</strong> 50% on average, whereas that <strong>of</strong> the control group was<br />
decreased by 53%. In addition, the EO- <strong>and</strong> prednisolone-treated groups exhibited significantly<br />
lower score values <strong>of</strong> macro- <strong>and</strong> microscopic characters after comparison to the acetic acid-treated<br />
group. These findings demonstrate that the beneficial effect <strong>of</strong> Satureja khuzestanica Jamzad EO<br />
could be compared to that <strong>of</strong> prednisolone. The antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, <strong>and</strong><br />
antispasmodic properties <strong>of</strong> the EO may be responsible for the protection <strong>of</strong> animals against experimentally<br />
induced inflammatory bowel diseases.<br />
The biological activity <strong>and</strong> the composition <strong>of</strong> the EOs <strong>of</strong> 17 indigenous Agathosma (Rutaceae)<br />
species were examined by Viljoen et al. (2006a) in order to validate their traditional use. The analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> the EOs furnished 322 different components. The anti-inflammatory activity was detected<br />
with the 5-lipoxygenase assay <strong>and</strong> all oils inhibited inflammations in vitro with Agathosma collina<br />
achieving the best results (IC 50 value <strong>of</strong> about 25 mg/mL). These results show that the EOs <strong>of</strong> the<br />
different Agathosma species strongly suppress the 5-lipoxgenase.<br />
The chemical composition <strong>and</strong> biological activity <strong>of</strong> the EOs <strong>of</strong> four related Salvia species<br />
(Lamiaceae) also indigenous to South Africa was evaluated by Kamatou et al. (2006). The authors<br />
isolated the EOs from fresh aerial parts by hydrodistillation <strong>and</strong> analyzed the chemical composition<br />
by GC-MS. The differences between the different species were rather quantitative. Forty-three<br />
components were identified accounting for 78% <strong>of</strong> Salvia africana-caerulea, 78% <strong>of</strong> Salvia<br />
africana-lutea, 96% <strong>of</strong> Salvia chamelaeagnea, <strong>and</strong> 81% <strong>of</strong> Salvia lanceolata total EO. Salvia<br />
africana-caerulea <strong>and</strong> Salvia lanceolata mainly contained oxygenated sesquiterpenes (59% <strong>and</strong><br />
48%, respectively), whereas Salvia chamelaeagnea was dominated by oxygen-containing monoterpenes<br />
(43%) <strong>and</strong> Salvia africana-lutea by monoterpene hydrocarbons (36%). The anti-inflammatory<br />
effect was tested with the 5-lipoxygenase method.
Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 253<br />
Viljoen et al. (2006b) studied the chemical composition <strong>and</strong> in vitro biological activities <strong>of</strong><br />
seven Namibian species <strong>of</strong> Eriocephalus L. (Asteraceae). The EOs <strong>of</strong> Eriocephalus ericoides ssp.<br />
ericoides (samples 1 <strong>and</strong> 2), Eriocephalus merxmuelleri, Eriocephalus scariosus, Eriocephalus<br />
dinteri, Eriocephalus luederitzianus, Eriocephalus klinghardtensis, <strong>and</strong> Eriocephalus pinnatus were<br />
analyzed by GC-MS. Eriocephalus ericoides ssp. ericoides (sample 1), Eriocephalus merxmuelleri,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Eriocephalus scariosus contained high levels <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole <strong>and</strong> camphor <strong>and</strong> Eriocephalus<br />
scariosus was also rich in santolina alcohol (14.8%). Most camphor was found in Eriocephalus dinteri<br />
(38.4%), whereas the major compound <strong>of</strong> Eriocephalus ericoides ssp. ericoides (sample 2) was linalool<br />
(10.4%). The composition <strong>of</strong> Eriocephalus luederitzianus <strong>and</strong> Eriocephalus klinghardtensis was<br />
similar, both containing high levels <strong>of</strong> a-pinene, b-pinene, p-cymene, <strong>and</strong> g-terpinene. Eriocephalus<br />
luederitzianus additionally was rich in a-longipinene (10.3%) <strong>and</strong> b-caryophyllene (13.3%).<br />
Eriocephalus pinnatus was different from the other taxa containing mainly isoamyl 2-methyl butyrate<br />
(7.9%) <strong>and</strong> isoamyl valerate (6.5%). The anti-inflammatory activity was evaluated using the 5-lipoxygenase<br />
enzyme <strong>and</strong> Eriocephalus dinteri achieved best results (IC 50 : 35 mg/mL).<br />
Wang <strong>and</strong> Zhu (2006) studied the anti-inflammatory effect <strong>of</strong> ginger oil (Zingiber <strong>of</strong>fi cinale,<br />
Zingiberaceae) with the model <strong>of</strong> mouse auricle edema induced by xylene <strong>and</strong> rat paw edema<br />
induced by egg white for acute inflammation <strong>and</strong> the granuloma hyperplasia model in mouse caused<br />
by filter paper for chronic inflammation. Additionally, the influence <strong>of</strong> ginger oil on delayed-type<br />
hypersensitivity (DHT) induced by 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) in mice was observed. The<br />
authors found that ginger oil significantly inhibited both mouse auricle edema <strong>and</strong> rat paw edema<br />
<strong>and</strong> it also reduced the mouse granuloma hyperplasia <strong>and</strong> DHT.<br />
The anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> Carlina acanthifolia (acanthus-leaved thistle, Asteraceae) root<br />
EO was evaluated by Dordevic et al. (2007). In traditional medicine the root <strong>of</strong> the plant is used for<br />
the treatment <strong>of</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> diseases concerning stomach <strong>and</strong> skin. The anti-inflammatory activity<br />
was tested in the carrageenan-induced rat paw edema assay <strong>and</strong> the oil inhibited the edema in all<br />
applied concentrations. The effect could be compared to indomethacin, which was used as control.<br />
Another study was made on the anti-inflammatory effect <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>and</strong> the active compounds <strong>of</strong><br />
the Boraginaceae Cordia verbenacea (black sage) by Passos et al. (2007). It was found that the carrageenan-induced<br />
rat paw edema, the myeloperoxidase activity, <strong>and</strong> the mouse edema elicited by<br />
carrageenan, bradykinin, substance P, histamine, <strong>and</strong> the platelet-activating factor could be inhibited<br />
after systemic (p.o.) administration <strong>of</strong> 300–600 mg/kg EO. It also suppressed carrageenan-evoked<br />
exudation, the neutrophil influx to the rat pleura <strong>and</strong> the neutrophil migration into carrageenanstimulated<br />
mouse air pouches. Additionally, a reduction <strong>of</strong> edema caused by Apis mellifera venomous<br />
OVA in sensitized rats <strong>and</strong> OVA-evoked allergic pleurisy could be observed. TNF-a was<br />
significantly inhibited in carrageenan-treated rat paws by the EO, whereas the IL-1b expression was<br />
not influenced. No affection was caused <strong>of</strong> neither the PGE2 formation after intrapleural injection <strong>of</strong><br />
carrageenan, nor <strong>of</strong> the COX-1 or COX-2 activities in vitro. Both sesquiterpenes, a-humulene <strong>and</strong><br />
trans-caryophyllene (50 mg/kg p.o.) obtained from the EO, lead to a remarkable reduction <strong>of</strong> the<br />
carrageenan-induced mice paw edema. All in all, this study demonstrated the anti-inflammatory<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> Cordia verbenacea <strong>and</strong> its active compounds. The possible mechanism <strong>of</strong> this<br />
effect might be caused by the interaction with the TNF-a production. The authors suggest that Cordia<br />
verbenacea EO could represent new therapeutic options for the treatment <strong>of</strong> inflammatory diseases.<br />
The topical anti-inflammatory effect <strong>of</strong> the leaf EO <strong>of</strong> the Verbenaceae Lippia sidoides Cham.<br />
was studied by Monteiro et al. (2007). In northwestern Brazil, the plant is widely used in the social<br />
medicine program “Live Pharmacies” as a general antiseptic because <strong>of</strong> its strong activity against<br />
many microorganisms. After topical application <strong>of</strong> 1 <strong>and</strong> 10 mg/ear, in 45.9% <strong>and</strong> 35.3%, a significant<br />
reduction (p < 0.05) <strong>of</strong> the acute ear edema induced by 12-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate<br />
(TPA) could be observed.<br />
The anti-inflammatory effects <strong>of</strong> the EO from Eremanthus erythropappus leaves (Asteraceae)<br />
have already been discussed in the chapter dealing with antinociception (Sousa et al., 2008).<br />
An interesting study concerning the healing <strong>of</strong> Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis by the
254 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
volatile oil <strong>of</strong> “Amomum” (several Amomum species, which are used in similar manner to cardamon<br />
(Elettaria cardamomum), Zingiberaceae) was published recently by a Chinese author group. The<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> this EO on the expressions <strong>of</strong> mastocarcinoma-related peptide <strong>and</strong> platelet-activating factor<br />
was assessed <strong>and</strong> its potential mechanism discussed. The mechanism <strong>of</strong> this volatile oil for its<br />
antigastritis activity could be the influence on the decrease <strong>of</strong> the expression <strong>of</strong> the platelet-activating<br />
factor <strong>and</strong> thus regulating the hydrophobicity <strong>of</strong> the gastric membrane. About 88% <strong>of</strong> the patients<br />
with a proven Helicobacter pylori infection were treated <strong>and</strong> showed a higher healing rate compared<br />
to the control group having received a traditional “Western” tertiary medicinal treatment<br />
(Huang et al., 2008).<br />
9.1.5 PENETRATION ENHANCEMENT*<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> EOs are able to improve the penetration <strong>of</strong> various drugs through living membranes,<br />
for example, the skin. The improvement <strong>of</strong> the penetration can be achieved by the interaction <strong>of</strong> the<br />
EOs with liquid crystals <strong>of</strong> skin lipids. In the following, the penetration enhancing effect <strong>of</strong> some<br />
EOs will be discussed. For determination <strong>of</strong> the penetration enhancing effect different experimental<br />
setups were used: Valia–Chien horizontal diffusion cells, Keshary–Chien diffusion cells, <strong>and</strong> Franz<br />
diffusion cells. Furthermore, the scientists using polarizing microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry<br />
(DSC), x-ray diffraction, <strong>and</strong> high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to detect the<br />
penetration through the skin.<br />
The interaction <strong>of</strong> eucalyptus oil with liquid crystals <strong>of</strong> skin lipids was proved by Abdullah et al.<br />
(1999) using polarizing microscopy, DSC, <strong>and</strong> x-ray diffraction. Crystal 1 (matrix 1) consisted <strong>of</strong><br />
five fatty acids <strong>of</strong> stratum corneum, crystal 2 (matrix 2) consisted <strong>of</strong> cholesterol together with five<br />
fatty acids. Dispersion <strong>and</strong> swelling <strong>of</strong> the lamellar structure were observed after application <strong>of</strong><br />
small amounts <strong>of</strong> eucalyptus oil, whereas large amounts resulted in their breakage <strong>and</strong> disappearance.<br />
The EO did not promote the formation <strong>of</strong> any other structures. This interaction seems to be<br />
the explanation for the increase <strong>of</strong> permeation <strong>of</strong> drugs through stratum corneum in the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
eucalyptus oil <strong>and</strong> similar penetration enhancers.<br />
Li et al. (2001) investigated the effects <strong>of</strong> eucalyptus oil on percutaneous penetration <strong>and</strong> absorption<br />
<strong>of</strong> a clobetasol propionate cream using vertical diffusion cells. The in vitro penetration <strong>of</strong> the cream<br />
containing 0.05% clobetasol propionate through mouse abdominal skin was detected at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10,<br />
<strong>and</strong> 24 h (cumulative amount Q, mg/g) <strong>and</strong> at steady state (J, mg/cm2/h). The quantity <strong>of</strong> clobetasol<br />
propionate within the whole stria <strong>of</strong> skin after 24 h (D, mg/g) was measured too. Eucalyptus oil was<br />
able to increase Q <strong>and</strong> J, whereas D was not influenced in that way, which indicates that eucalyptus oil<br />
would increase clobetasol propionate percutaneous absorption <strong>and</strong> cause unwanted side effects.<br />
Cinnamon oil, eugenia oil, <strong>and</strong> galangal oil have been studied for their potency as percutaneous<br />
penetration enhancers for benzoic acid (Shen et al., 2001). Valia–Chien horizontal diffusion cell <strong>and</strong><br />
HPLC were used to detect benzoic acid penetration through skin.<br />
Skin penetration <strong>of</strong> benzoic acid was significantly enhanced by all three volatile oils. In combination<br />
with ethanol <strong>and</strong> propylene glycol the amount <strong>of</strong> benzoic acid was increased, but the permeability<br />
coefficients were decreased. In conclusion, cinnamon oil, eugenia oil, <strong>and</strong> galangal oil might<br />
be used as percutaneous penetration enhancers for benzoic acid.<br />
Monti et al. (2002) tried to examine the effects <strong>of</strong> six terpene-containing EOs on permeation <strong>of</strong><br />
estradiol through hairless mouse skin. Therefore, in vitro tests with cajeput, cardamom, melissa,<br />
myrte, niaouli, <strong>and</strong> orange oil (all 10% wt/wt concentration in propylene glycol) have been carried<br />
out. Niaouli oil was found as the best permeation promoter for estradiol. Tests with its single main<br />
components 1,8-cineole, a-pinene, a-terpineol, <strong>and</strong> d-limonene (all 10% wt/wt concentration in<br />
propylene glycol) showed that the whole niaouli oil was a better activity promoter than the single<br />
compounds. These data demonstrate complex terpene mixtures to be potent transdermal penetration<br />
enhancers for moderately lipophilic drugs like estradiol.<br />
* Adorjan, M., 2007. Part <strong>of</strong> her master thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna.
Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 255<br />
Different terpene-containing EOs have been investigated for their enhancing effect in the percutaneous<br />
absorption <strong>of</strong> trazodone hydrochloride through mouse epidermis (Das et al., 2006). Fennel<br />
oil, eucalyptus oil, citronella oil, <strong>and</strong> mentha oil were applied on the skin membrane in the transdermal<br />
device, as a pretreatment or both using Keshary–Chien diffusion cells <strong>and</strong> constantly stirring<br />
saline phosphate buffer <strong>of</strong> pH 7.4 at 37 ± 1°C as receptor phase. Pretreatment <strong>of</strong> the skin with EOs<br />
increased the flux values <strong>of</strong> trazodone hydrochloride compared with the values obtained when the<br />
same EOs were included in the transdermal devices. The percutaneous penetration flux was<br />
increased with skin permeation by 10% EOs in the following order: fennel oil > eucalyptus<br />
oil > citronella oil > mentha oil. The quantity <strong>of</strong> trazodone hydrochloride kept in the skin was very<br />
similar for all EOs <strong>and</strong> much higher than in control group.<br />
An in vitro study about Australian TTO was made by Reichling et al. (2006). The aim <strong>of</strong> the<br />
study was to investigate the penetration enhancement <strong>of</strong> terpinen-4-ol, the main compound <strong>of</strong> TTO,<br />
using Franz diffusion cells with heat seperated human epidermis <strong>and</strong> infinite dosing conditions.<br />
The three semisolid preparations with 5% TTO showed the following flux values: semisolid oil-inwater<br />
(O/W) emulsion (0.067 mL/cm2/h) > white petrolatum (0.051 mL/cm2/h) > ambiphilic cream<br />
(0.022 mL/cm2/h). Because <strong>of</strong> the lower content <strong>of</strong> terpinen-4-ol, the flux values were significantly<br />
reduced compared to native TTO (0.26 mL/cm2/h). The papp values for native TTO<br />
(1.62 ± 0.12 × 10 −7 cm/s) <strong>and</strong> ambiphilic cream were comparable (2.74 ± 0.06 × 10 −7 cm/s), whereas<br />
with white petrolatum (6.36 ± 0.21 × 10 −7 cm/s) <strong>and</strong> semisolid O/W emulsion (8.41 ± 0.15 × 10 −7 cm/s)<br />
higher values indicated a penetration enhancement. Between permea tion <strong>and</strong> liberation there was<br />
no relationship observed (Table 9.2). The stratum corneum absorption <strong>and</strong> retention <strong>of</strong> linalool <strong>and</strong><br />
terpinen-4-ol was investigated by Cal <strong>and</strong> Krzyzaniak (2006). Both monoterpenes were applied to<br />
eight human subjects as oily solution or as carbomeric hydrogel. The stratum corneum absorption<br />
after application <strong>of</strong> carbomeric hydrogel was better than that achieved with an oily solution. Two<br />
mechanisms <strong>of</strong> elimination from the stratum corneum were observed: evaporation from the outer<br />
layer <strong>and</strong> drainage <strong>of</strong> the stratum corneum reservoir via penetration into dermis. The retention <strong>of</strong><br />
the monoterpenes in the stratum corneum during the elimination phase was a steady state between<br />
6 <strong>and</strong> 13 mg/cm2.<br />
Also linalool alone, one <strong>of</strong> the most prominent monoterpene alcohols, is used in many dermal<br />
preparations as penetration enhancer. In a series <strong>of</strong> in vitro studies it was shown that linalool<br />
enhanced its own penetration (Cal <strong>and</strong> Sznitowska, 2003) as well as the absorption <strong>of</strong> other therapeutics,<br />
such as haloperidol (Vaddi et al., 2002a, 2002b), metoperidol (Komuru et al., 1999), propanolol<br />
hydrochloride (Kunta et al., 1997), <strong>and</strong> transcutol (Ceschel et al., 2000). Cal (2005) showed in<br />
another in vitro study the influence <strong>of</strong> linalool on the absorption <strong>and</strong> elimination kinetics <strong>and</strong> was<br />
able to prove that this monoterpene alcohol furnished the highest absorption ratio compared to an<br />
oily solution or an O/W emulsion.<br />
Wang, L.H. et al. (2008) reported on enhancer effects on human skin penetration <strong>of</strong> aminophylline<br />
from cream formulations <strong>and</strong> investigated for this report four EOs, namely rosemary, ylang,<br />
lilac, <strong>and</strong> peppermint oil compared with three plant oils, the liquid wax jojoba oil, <strong>and</strong> the fatty oils<br />
TABLE 9.2<br />
Flux Values <strong>and</strong> Papp Values <strong>of</strong> the Three Semisolid Preparations<br />
<strong>of</strong> Australian TTO 5%<br />
Flux Values (μL/cm²/h)<br />
Papp Values (cm/s)<br />
Native TTO 0.26 1.62 ± 0.12 × 10 −7<br />
Ambiphilic cream 0.022 2.74 ± 0.06 × 10 −7<br />
Semisolid O/W emulsion 0.067 8.41 ± 0.15 × 10 −7<br />
White petrolatum 0.051 6.36 ± 0.21 × 10 −7
256 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> corn germs <strong>and</strong> olives. In this study the EOs were less effective in their penetration enhancement<br />
than the three plant oils. The effect <strong>of</strong> penetration enhancers on permeation kinetics <strong>of</strong> nitrendipine<br />
through two different skin models was evaluated by Mittal et al. (2008) <strong>and</strong> also this author group<br />
found that the used EOs (thyme oil, palmarosa oil, petit grain oil, <strong>and</strong> basil oil) were inferior in their<br />
penetration enhancement effects to oleic acid but superior to a lot <strong>of</strong> other common permeation<br />
enhancers, such as sodium lauryl sulfate, myristic acid, lauric acid, Tween 80, or Span 80. In contrast<br />
to these two reports Jain et al. (2008) found that basil oil is a promising penetration enhancer<br />
for improved drug delivery <strong>of</strong> labetolol. The effect <strong>of</strong> clove oil on the transdermal delivery <strong>of</strong> ibupr<strong>of</strong>en<br />
in the rabbit in vitro <strong>and</strong> in vivo methods was investigated by Shen et al. (2007). The in vitro<br />
results indicated a significant penetration enhancement effect <strong>of</strong> the clove oil whereas the in vivo<br />
results showed a weaker enhancement. The good transdermal delivery <strong>of</strong> ibupr<strong>of</strong>en from the essential<br />
clove oil could be attributed to the principal constituents eugenol <strong>and</strong> acetyl eugenol.<br />
9.1.6 ANTIOXIDATIVE PROPERTIES*<br />
Free radicals are aggressive, unstable, <strong>and</strong> highly reactive atoms or compounds because <strong>of</strong> their<br />
single electron. They attack other molecules to reach a steady stage, thereby changing their properties<br />
<strong>and</strong> making disorders inside possible. Free radicals result from products from different metabolic<br />
activities. A large number occur because <strong>of</strong> smog, nitrogen oxides, ozone, cigarette smoke, <strong>and</strong><br />
toxic heavy metal. Also chemicals such as organic solvents, halogenated hydrocarbons, pesticides,<br />
<strong>and</strong> cytostatic drugs cause a high number <strong>of</strong> free radicals. If a lot <strong>of</strong> energy is built or has to be supplied,<br />
such as sporty high-performance, extreme endurance sports, sunbathing, solarium, exposure,<br />
x-rays, UV radiation, pyrexia, or infections, they are also massively produced (Schehl <strong>and</strong> Schroth,<br />
2004). Preferred for attack are nucleic acids <strong>of</strong> the DNA <strong>and</strong> RNA, proteins, <strong>and</strong> especially polyunsaturated<br />
fatty acids <strong>of</strong> the membrane lipids. To protect the body’s own structure from damages,<br />
all aerobe living cells use enzymatic <strong>and</strong> nonenzymatic mechanisms. Scavangers are able to yield<br />
electrons <strong>and</strong> so they dispose free radicals. Also, enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD),<br />
catalase, <strong>and</strong> glutathione peroxidase are very important in protection mechanisms (Eckert et al.,<br />
2006). Oxidative <strong>and</strong> antioxidative processes should keep the balance. If the balance is in benefit for<br />
the oxidative processes, it is called “oxidative stress.”<br />
9.1.6.1 Reactive Oxygen Species<br />
Basically, oxygen radicals (Table 9.3) are built by one-electron reduction in the context <strong>of</strong> autoxidation<br />
<strong>of</strong> cell-mediated compounds. The superoxide radical arises from autoxidation <strong>of</strong> hydroquinone,<br />
flavine, hemoglobin, glutathione, <strong>and</strong> other mercaptans <strong>and</strong> also from UV light, x-rays, or gamma<br />
rays. Two-electron reduction yields hydrogen peroxide. The very reactive hydroxyl radical is built<br />
by three-electron reduction, which is mostly catalyzed by metal ion (Löffler <strong>and</strong> Petrides, 1998). A<br />
lot <strong>of</strong> other oxygen radicals are accumulated by secondary reactions because they damage the<br />
biomolecules, ROS participate in different diseases, mainly cancer, aging, diabetes mellitus, <strong>and</strong><br />
atherosclerosis.<br />
9.1.6.2 Antioxidants<br />
Antioxidants are substances that are able to protect organisms from oxidative stress. A distinction<br />
is drawn between three types <strong>of</strong> antioxidants: enzymatic antioxidants, nonenzymatic antioxidants,<br />
<strong>and</strong> repair enzymes.<br />
Well-known naturally occurring antioxidants are vitamin C (ascorbic acid), which are contained<br />
in many citrus fruits, or on the other h<strong>and</strong> members <strong>of</strong> vitamin E family, which appear for example<br />
in nuts <strong>and</strong> sunflower seeds. Also b-carotene <strong>and</strong> lycopine, which also belong to the family <strong>of</strong> carotenoides,<br />
are further examples <strong>of</strong> natural antioxidants. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, there are many synthetic<br />
* Scheurecker, M., 2007. Part <strong>of</strong> her master thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna.
Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 257<br />
TABLE 9.3<br />
Reactive Oxygen Species<br />
Species<br />
Name<br />
O2 -• Superoxide radical<br />
HO<br />
•<br />
2 Perhydroxyl<br />
H 2 O 2<br />
Hydrogen peroxide<br />
HO • Hydroxyl radical<br />
RO • R-oxyl radical<br />
ROO • R-dioxyl radical<br />
substances such as butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), <strong>and</strong> the<br />
water-soluble vitamin E derivative troxol (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid)<br />
noted for their antioxidative activity. Different studies suspect the synthetic antioxidants to cause<br />
different diseases, so there has been much interest in the antioxidative activity <strong>of</strong> naturally occurring<br />
substances (Salehi et al., 2005).<br />
To the group <strong>of</strong> enzymatic antioxidants belongs the manganese- or zinc-containing SOD, the<br />
selenium-containing glutathione peroxidase, <strong>and</strong> the iron-containing catalase. Their capacity is<br />
addicted to adequate trace elements <strong>and</strong> minerals (Schehl et al., 2004). Nonenzymatic antioxidants<br />
have to be admitted with food or substitution, for example, a-tocopherol, l-ascorbic acid, b-carotene,<br />
<strong>and</strong> secondary ingredients <strong>of</strong> plants. Repair enzymes delete damaged molecules <strong>and</strong> substitute them.<br />
9.1.7 TEST METHODS<br />
9.1.7.1 Free Radical Scavenging Assay<br />
This spectrophotometric assay uses the stable free radical 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) as<br />
a reagent (Yadegarinia et al., 2006). The model <strong>of</strong> scavenging stable DPPH-free radicals can be used<br />
to evaluate the antioxidative activities in a relatively short time (Conforti et al., 2006). The samples<br />
are able to reduce the stable free DPPH radical to 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl that is yellow<br />
colored. The hydrogen or electron donation abilities <strong>of</strong> the samples are measured by means <strong>of</strong> the<br />
decrease <strong>of</strong> the absorbance resulting in a color change from purple to yellow (Gutierrez et al., 2006).<br />
Another procedure can be applied for an EO. A dilution <strong>of</strong> the EO in toluene is applied onto a thinlayer<br />
chromatography (TLC) plate <strong>and</strong> toluene-ethyl-acetate is used as a developer (Sökmen et al.,<br />
2004a). The plates are sprayed with 0.4 mM DPPH in methanol. The active compounds were<br />
detected as yellow spots on a purple background. Only those compounds, which changed the color<br />
within 30 min, are taken as a positive result.<br />
9.1.7.2 β-Carotene Bleaching Test<br />
The lipid peroxidation inhibitory activities <strong>of</strong> EOs are assessed by the b-carotene bleaching<br />
tests (Yadegarinia et al., 2006). In this method, the ability to minimize the coupled oxidation <strong>of</strong><br />
b-carotene <strong>and</strong> linoleic acid is measured with a photospectrometer. The reaction with radicals shows<br />
a change in this orange color. The b-carotene bleaching test shows better results than the DPPH<br />
assay because it is more specialized in lipophilic compounds. The test is important in the food<br />
industry because the test medium is an emulsion, which is near to the situation in food, therefore<br />
allowable alternatives to synthetic antioxidants can be found. An only qualitative assertion uses the<br />
TLC procedure. A sample <strong>of</strong> the EOs is applied onto a TLC plate <strong>and</strong> is sprayed with b-carotene<br />
<strong>and</strong> linoleic acid. Afterwards, the plate is ab<strong>and</strong>oned to the daylight for 45 min. Zones with constant<br />
yellow colors show an antioxidative activity <strong>of</strong> the component (Guerrini et al., 2006).
258 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
9.1.7.3 Deoxyribose Assay<br />
This assay is used for determining the scavenging activity on the hydroxyl radical. The pure EO is<br />
applied in different concentrations (Dordević et al., 2006). The competition between deoxyribose<br />
<strong>and</strong> the sample about hydroxyl radicals that are engendered by an Fe 3+ /EDTA/H 2 O 2 system is measured.<br />
The radicals were formed to attack the deoxyribose <strong>and</strong> they are detected by their ability to<br />
degrade 2-deoxy-2-ribose into fragments. These degradation products generate with 2-thiobarbituric<br />
acid (TBA) at a low pH <strong>and</strong> upon heating pink chromogens. The TBA-reactive substances could<br />
be determined spectrophotometrically at 532 nm. So the damage <strong>of</strong> 2-deoxy-2-ribose by the radicals<br />
is detected with the aid <strong>of</strong> the TBA assay.<br />
9.1.7.4 TBA Test<br />
This assay is basically used to appoint the lipid oxidation. It is an older test for receiving the oxidation<br />
status <strong>of</strong> fats spectrophotometrically. Thereby the aldehydes, which are generated by the autoxidation<br />
<strong>of</strong> unsaturated fatty acids, are converted into red or yellow colorimeters with TBA. But it is<br />
also used for the determination <strong>of</strong> the potency <strong>of</strong> antioxidants with thiobarbituric acid reactive substances<br />
(TBARS). Thereby the antioxidant activity is measured by the inhibition <strong>of</strong> the lipid oxidation.<br />
It concerns the spectrophotometric detection <strong>of</strong> malonic aldehyde, one <strong>of</strong> the secondary lipid<br />
peroxidation products, which generates a pink pigment with TBA (Ruberto et al., 2000; Varda-Ünlü<br />
et al., 2003).<br />
9.1.7.5 Xanthine–Xanthine Oxidase Assay<br />
Superoxide radicals are produced by a xanthine–xanthine oxidase system. Xanthine is able to generate<br />
O 2<br />
•<br />
<strong>and</strong> H 2 O 2 by using xanthine oxidase as a substrate. The superoxide radicals are able to<br />
reduce the yellow colored nitro triazolium blue (NTB) to the blue formazan, which is used for monitoring<br />
the reaction. The superoxide anions are measured spectrophotometrically. This test method<br />
was developed to explore the reaction between antioxidants <strong>and</strong> O 2• . So the inhibition <strong>of</strong> the superoxide<br />
reductase is a mark for the ability <strong>of</strong> antioxidative activity.<br />
9.1.7.6 Linoleic Acid Assay<br />
This test system was developed to determine the ability <strong>of</strong> substances to inhibit the generation <strong>of</strong><br />
hydroxy peroxides at the early stages <strong>of</strong> the oxidation <strong>of</strong> linoleic acid, as well as for its inhibitory<br />
potential after the formation <strong>of</strong> secondary oxidized products such as aldehydes, ketones, or hydrocarbons<br />
(Jirovetz et al., 2006). Either the oxidation <strong>of</strong> linoleic acid is monitored by measuring the values<br />
<strong>of</strong> conjugated dienes or TBARS spectrophotometrically or hydroperoxy-octadeca-dienoic acid isomers<br />
(HOPES) generated during the oxidation are measured ( Marongiu et al., 2004).<br />
The biological features <strong>of</strong> Mentha piperita L. (peppermint, Lamiaceae) oil <strong>and</strong> Myrtus communis<br />
L. (myrtle, Myrtaceae) oil from Iran were studied by Yadegarinia et al. (2006). One <strong>of</strong> the main<br />
constituents <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> Myrtus communis is 1,8-cineole (also called eucalyptol), which showed<br />
the most powerful DPPH radical scavenging activity. Myrtle oil contains about 18% 1,8-cineole <strong>and</strong><br />
showed a scavenging activity <strong>of</strong> 3.5% upon reduction <strong>of</strong> the DPPH radical to the neutral DPPH-H<br />
form. Better results yielded the b-carotene bleaching test. Also the EO <strong>of</strong> Mentha aquatica (water<br />
mint) contains up to 14% 1,8-cineole <strong>and</strong> proved itself in the DPPH assay to be an acceptably radical<br />
scavenger <strong>and</strong> the most active compound in the oil. With Mentha communis oil comprising 21.5%<br />
limonene, an antioxidative activity was assessed with about 43% in contrast to the reference oil <strong>of</strong><br />
Thymus porlock (Lamiaceae) having an efficiency <strong>of</strong> 77% (Mimica-Dukic et al., 2003). Also a-terpinene,<br />
a constituent <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> Mentha piperita (about 20%), showed in both test procedures a<br />
scavenging activity lower than that <strong>of</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ard found with the EO <strong>of</strong> Thymus porlock, but<br />
similar to the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the synthetic antioxidant trolox (23.5% versus 28.3%). Another main<br />
compound <strong>of</strong> this oil is b-caryophyllene with about 8%. Mentha piperita oil attained a scavenging<br />
power <strong>of</strong> 23.5% <strong>and</strong> is also able to inhibit the lipid oxidation, which was determined in the b-carotene<br />
bleaching test. The results <strong>of</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>and</strong> the EO were correlated with the results from the
Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 259<br />
DPHH assay. The peppermint oil shows a lipid peroxidation inhibition <strong>of</strong> 50% compared with 77%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ard.<br />
Sesuvium portulacastrum (sea purslane, Ficoidaceae) was collected in the northern, western, <strong>and</strong><br />
central part <strong>of</strong> Zimbabwe to determine the chemical activity <strong>of</strong> the essential leaf oils, which showed<br />
besides an antibacterial <strong>and</strong> antifungal also a significant antioxidative activity (Magwa et al., 2006).<br />
Sea purslane is used by the traditional healers in Southern Africa to treat various infections <strong>and</strong><br />
kidney problems. The secondary metabolites from this plant species have a great potential as substitutes<br />
for synthetic raw materials in food, perfumery, cosmetic, <strong>and</strong> pharmaceutical industries.<br />
Thus, the composition <strong>and</strong> the biological activities <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> this Ficoidaceae were studied. One<br />
<strong>of</strong> the major chemical compounds is 1,8-cineole (6.8%). The antioxidative testing was carried out by<br />
a modified b-carotene bleaching test. The background <strong>of</strong> these test methods is that b-carotene is a<br />
yellow antioxidant, which becomes colorless when it encounters light or oxygen. With the attendance<br />
<strong>of</strong> another antioxidant, which is not so sensitive to light or oxygen, the yellow color <strong>of</strong> the<br />
b-carotene could continue for some time. Retention <strong>of</strong> the yellow areas around the test compounds<br />
shows an antioxidative activity. In comparison to the positive control (ascorbic acid) with a diameter<br />
<strong>of</strong> 27 mm, the EO showed a 15.9-mm zone <strong>of</strong> color retention. Mainly responsible to the antioxidative<br />
activity besides this bicyclic ether is the content <strong>of</strong> 2-b-pinene (13.6%), a-pinene (14%),<br />
limonene (6.4%), <strong>and</strong> ocimene, a-terpinolene, <strong>and</strong> camphene, which also belong to the group <strong>of</strong><br />
main compounds <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> Sesuvium portulacastrum.<br />
Thymus (thyme, Lamiaceae) is a very big genus, to which more than 300 evergreen species<br />
belong. All <strong>of</strong> them are well-known aromatic <strong>and</strong> medical plants <strong>and</strong> also the oil <strong>of</strong> different species<br />
are used against various diseases. So, many species <strong>of</strong> this genus were tested for their biological<br />
activities inclusive the antioxidative properties <strong>of</strong> the EOs <strong>and</strong> their constituents. The EOs <strong>of</strong> Thymus<br />
caespititius (Azoricus thyme, Lamiaceae), Thymus camphoratus (camphor thyme), <strong>and</strong> Thymus<br />
mastichina (mastic thyme) show in different investigations an antioxidative activity, which is comparable<br />
to the action <strong>of</strong> a-tocopherol, a well-known naturally occurring antioxidant (Miguel et al.,<br />
2003). One reason for this capacity could be that the EO <strong>of</strong> all three species contains a high concentration<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole. Because species <strong>of</strong> the genus Thymus (thyme) are widely used as medicinal<br />
plants <strong>and</strong> spices, the antioxidative activity <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> Thymus pectinatus comprising up to 16%<br />
g-terpinene was determined by multifarious test systems. To detect the hydroxyl scavenging activity<br />
a deoxyribose assay was used, a DPPH assay was arranged, <strong>and</strong> the inhibition <strong>of</strong> lipid peroxidation<br />
formation by a TBA assay was measured. Fifty percent <strong>of</strong> the free DPPH radicals were scavenged<br />
by the EO, which is a stronger antioxidative activity than that <strong>of</strong> the used st<strong>and</strong>ards (BHT, curcumin,<br />
<strong>and</strong> ascorbic acid). Furthermore, the EO showed an inhibitory effect in the deoxyribose assay, <strong>and</strong><br />
comparable results emanated from the TBA assay, where the oil had an IC 50 value similar to the<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> BHT. Finally, also the EO <strong>of</strong> Thymus zygis (sauce thyme) which contains among other<br />
monoterpenes p-cymene showed a dose-dependent antioxidative activity (Dorman <strong>and</strong> Deans, 2004).<br />
Furthermore, the above described species, Thymus pectinatus, is characterized by a very high content<br />
<strong>of</strong> the phenolic compound thymol. Therefore, two fractions <strong>of</strong> this EO, characterized by a high<br />
content <strong>of</strong> thymol (95.5% <strong>and</strong> 80.7%, respectively), were studied using four different test methods to<br />
assess their antioxidative activity. Fifty percent <strong>of</strong> the free radicals in the test with DPPH were scavenged<br />
by 0.36 ± 0.10 mg/mL <strong>of</strong> the EO. This is a stronger inhibition as the controls afford. Then<br />
the deoxyribose assay was used to identify the inhibition <strong>of</strong> the degradation <strong>of</strong> hydroxyl radicals by<br />
the EO <strong>and</strong> its main compounds. The investigation showed that thymol has an IC 50 value <strong>of</strong><br />
0.90 ± 0.05 mg/mL <strong>and</strong> the EO an IC 50 value <strong>of</strong> 1.40 ± 0.03 mg/mL. To prove the inhibition <strong>of</strong> the<br />
lipid peroxidation, also the TBA method was used <strong>and</strong> afforded an IC 50 value <strong>of</strong> 9.50 ± 0.02 mg/mL<br />
for the EO. Also in this case the EO showed a better protection than the control substances BHT <strong>and</strong><br />
curcumin, so to say the two major compounds, thymol <strong>and</strong> carvacrol, show a very strong antioxidative<br />
activity. Then the EO <strong>of</strong> another thyme species with a thymol content <strong>of</strong> about 31%, namely<br />
Thymus eigii, was studied by the DPPH <strong>and</strong> the b-carotene bleaching test (Tepe et al., 2004). For<br />
the rapid screening DPPH on TLC was applied. Compendiously after the plate had been sprayed
260 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
three spots appeared, which were identified as thymol, carvacrol, <strong>and</strong> a-terpineol. Thus, an antioxidative<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> this EO was established as well. Also in the volatile extract <strong>of</strong> Thymus vulgaris<br />
(common thyme), thymol dominates with 72%. In a test system, where the inhibition <strong>of</strong> hexane<br />
oxidation is used to determine the antioxidative activity, thymol shows one <strong>of</strong> the strongest activities.<br />
In a concentration <strong>of</strong> 10 mg/mL, the capacity to decrease the oxidation is equal to the activity<br />
<strong>of</strong> BHT <strong>and</strong> a-tocopherol. These two, well-known, antioxidants inhibit the hexane oxidation up to<br />
89% <strong>and</strong> 99% in a concentration <strong>of</strong> 5 mg/mL over 30 days. Also carvacrol, an isomer <strong>of</strong> thymol <strong>and</strong><br />
existing in a concentration <strong>of</strong> about 6% in this oil, is able to hinder the oxidation <strong>of</strong> hexane by<br />
95–99% at 5 mg/mL over a period <strong>of</strong> 30 days. This is comparable with the activity <strong>of</strong> BHT <strong>and</strong><br />
a-tocopherol (R<strong>and</strong>onic et al., 2003; Sacchetti et al., 2004; Faleiro et al., 2005). These findings<br />
could be confirmed by a very recent study <strong>of</strong> Chizzola et al. (2008). The antioxidative activity<br />
depends on the concentration <strong>of</strong> the phenolic constituents thymol <strong>and</strong>/or carvacrol.<br />
Thymol as well as carvacrol protects low-density lipoprotein (LDL) from oxidation (Pearson<br />
et al., 1997), <strong>and</strong> this antioxidative activity is dependent on the concentration: below 1.25 mM no<br />
effect was detected, whereas at a concentration between 2.5 <strong>and</strong> 5.0 mM thymol <strong>of</strong>fers a very strong<br />
antioxidative capacity. Finally, the EOs <strong>of</strong> 15 different wild grown Thymus species show the ability<br />
to delay lard becoming rancid, because <strong>of</strong> the inhibition <strong>of</strong> lipid oxidation. The value <strong>of</strong> generated<br />
peroxides was measured to detect the antioxidative activity. Therefore, variable concentrations <strong>of</strong><br />
the EO were added to lard <strong>and</strong> each mixture stored at 60ºC. In regular time intervals samples were<br />
taken <strong>and</strong> the peroxide amount was determined. As st<strong>and</strong>ards BHT, BHA, <strong>and</strong> thymol were used.<br />
A “thymol- <strong>and</strong> a thymol/carvacrol group” were able to keep the peroxide value low for a period <strong>of</strong><br />
7 days. The EOs <strong>of</strong> Thymus serpyllus (creeping thyme) <strong>and</strong> Thymus spathulifolius comprise high<br />
contents <strong>of</strong> carvacrol (58% <strong>and</strong> 30% respectively) <strong>and</strong> exhibit both an antioxidative activity near to<br />
BHT. Another species is Thymus capitata (Corido thyme), with an amount <strong>of</strong> 79% carvacrol, <strong>and</strong><br />
shows an antioxidative activity assessed by the TBA assay in variable concentrations. There is no<br />
difference at the concentration <strong>of</strong> 1000 mg/L between the capacity <strong>of</strong> the oil <strong>and</strong> the control BHT,<br />
but the antioxidative properties are better than BHA <strong>and</strong> a-tocopherol. In a micellar model system,<br />
where the decrease <strong>of</strong> just generated conjugated dienes is used to determine the antioxidative ability,<br />
Thymus capitata oil showed an antioxidative index <strong>of</strong> 96% <strong>and</strong> proved a good protective activity in<br />
the primary lipid oxidation. The oil is better effective against lipid oxidation <strong>and</strong> in higher concentrations<br />
better than BHA <strong>and</strong> a-tocopherol. The addition <strong>of</strong> a radical inducer reduced the antioxidative<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> the EO. Carvacrol is capable to prevent up to 96% the primary step <strong>of</strong> lipid oxidation.<br />
Also Thymus pectinatus EO contains carvacrol as one <strong>of</strong> the main compound <strong>and</strong> shows a strong<br />
antioxidative activity. Fifty percent inhibition <strong>of</strong> lipid peroxidation (detected by the TBA assay) was<br />
attained at a concentration <strong>of</strong> 5.2 mg/mL carvacrol (Vardar-Ünlü et al., 2003; Miguel et al., 2003;<br />
Hazzit et al., 2006).<br />
The EO <strong>of</strong> Ziziphora clinopodioides ssp. rigida (blue mint bush) was isolated by hydrodistillation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the dried aerial parts, which was collected during the anthesis. The main compounds are<br />
thymol <strong>and</strong> 1,8-cineole with a content <strong>of</strong> 8% <strong>and</strong> 2.7%, respectively. Different extracts were tested by<br />
the DPPH assay to determine the antioxidative activity <strong>and</strong> showed that the free radical scavenging<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> the menthol extract was superior to all other extracts. Polar extracts exhibited stronger<br />
antioxidant activity than nonpolar extracts (Salehi et al., 2005).<br />
Many species <strong>of</strong> the genus Artemisia (wormwood, Asteraceae) are used as spices, for alcoholic<br />
drinks <strong>and</strong> also in the folk <strong>and</strong> traditional medicine. The chemical compounds <strong>and</strong> the antioxidative<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> the EOs isolated from the aerial parts <strong>of</strong> Artemisia absinthium (vermouth), Artemisia<br />
santonicum (sea wormwood), <strong>and</strong> Artemisia spicigera (sluggish wormwood) were investigated<br />
(Kordali et al., 2005). The analysis <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> Artemisia santonicum <strong>and</strong> Artemisia spicigera<br />
showed two main components, namely 1,8-cineole <strong>and</strong> camphor. In addition, it is noticed that<br />
the EO <strong>of</strong> these two species contain no thujone derivates in contrast to Artemisia absinthium.<br />
Earlier studies have also shown that 1,8-cineole <strong>and</strong> camphor are main components <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong><br />
some Artemisia species. The antioxidative activity <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> Artemisia santonicum <strong>and</strong>
Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 261<br />
Artemisia spicigera was analyzed by the thiocyanate method <strong>and</strong> a high antioxidative activity<br />
was found. With the thiocyanate test <strong>and</strong> the DPPH radical scavenging assay, the high antioxidative<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> Artemisia santonicum EO is ensured. On account <strong>of</strong> their adequate antioxidative activity,<br />
Artemisia santonicum <strong>and</strong> Artemisia spicigera could possibly be used in the liqueur-making industry,<br />
because they do not include thujone derivates. The antioxidative activity <strong>of</strong> the EO from<br />
another wormwood species, namely Artemisia molinieri (mugwort), was investigated by chemoluminescence.<br />
The main compounds <strong>of</strong> this EO are a-terpinene with 36.4% <strong>and</strong> then 1,4-cineole<br />
(
262 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
extraction, had a better activity in the assay than the EOs. These test scores are an important argument<br />
for the use <strong>of</strong> some plants <strong>of</strong> this genus in the traditional medicine (Grassmann et al., 2000).<br />
Also the EO <strong>of</strong> the fresh fruits by Xylopia aethiopica (Meleguetta pepper, Negro pepper, <strong>and</strong><br />
African pepper tree, Anonaceae) is characterized by the occurrence <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole <strong>and</strong> b-pinene.<br />
But also EOs from the leaves (containing about 17% b-pinene <strong>and</strong> even 24.5% germacrene D),<br />
barks, stems, <strong>and</strong> roots are known <strong>and</strong> examined for their composition <strong>and</strong> antioxidative activities.<br />
The antioxidative activity <strong>of</strong> the EO from different parts <strong>of</strong> the plant was determined by the free<br />
radical scavenging assay with DPPH <strong>and</strong> the xanthine–xanthine assay. All tested samples were<br />
found to interact with the stable free radical DPPH in a time-dependent manner (Karioti et al.,<br />
2004). The highest radical scavenging in the DPPH assay was measured with the EO <strong>of</strong> the fresh<br />
fruits (comprising about 9% germacrene D) with an interaction <strong>of</strong> 85.6%. Generally, all the EOs <strong>of</strong><br />
the different parts possess the ability to scavenge free radicals. Also the xanthine–xanthine assay<br />
showed that the capability to reduce the superoxide radical is given.<br />
Plants <strong>of</strong> the genus Melaleuca (Tea tree, Myrtaceae) are rich in volatile oils. On this account,<br />
different species were investigated for their biological activity as well as for their antioxidative<br />
capacity. A GC-MS analysis revealed that 1,8-cineole is the major compound <strong>of</strong> the EO extracted<br />
from Melaleuca armillaris (33.9%). For the study 50 male albino rats were treated differently.<br />
Besides the control group the rats received multiple doses <strong>of</strong> the EO 3 times a week for 1 month. To<br />
evaluate the antioxidative activity the following estimations were carried out: SOD, vitamin C, catalase,<br />
glutathione, <strong>and</strong> lipid peroxides (Farag et al., 2004). An alternation <strong>of</strong> the antioxidant status<br />
induced by CCl 4 , as free radical inducer, before <strong>and</strong> after the administration <strong>of</strong> the EO was studied<br />
as well. The EO <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca armillaris increased the value <strong>of</strong> vitamin E <strong>and</strong> vitamin C. The same<br />
effect was given by the level <strong>of</strong> SOD <strong>and</strong> lipid peroxide compared to the control group. Only the<br />
level <strong>of</strong> catalase was decreased by the treatment <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca oil. TTO from Melaleuca alternifolia<br />
(Australian tea tree) is known for its wide spectrum <strong>of</strong> biological activities, therefore the antioxidative<br />
properties <strong>of</strong> TTO was assessed by various methods, such as the DPPH radical scavenging or<br />
the hexanal/hexanoic acid assay (Hyun-Jin et al., 2004). The crude EOs, as well as the most active<br />
fractions (fractions 5 <strong>and</strong> 6 after silica gel open column chromatography <strong>and</strong> C 18 -HPLC), were<br />
used for the investigation. The three major compounds in these fractions were g-terpinene (20.6%),<br />
a-terpinene (9.6%), <strong>and</strong> a-terpineol. A correlation between the scavenging activity <strong>and</strong> the concentration<br />
was emerged in the DPPH assay. At a concentration <strong>of</strong> 10 mM, the activity <strong>of</strong> a-terpinene<br />
with more than 80% was near to the scavenging capacity <strong>of</strong> BHT. Eighty-two percent activity was<br />
determined for a concentration <strong>of</strong> 180 mM which is also close to the synthetic antioxidant (85%). It<br />
was shown that a-terpinene had the strongest scavenging effect in this test system compared to the<br />
other two compounds. The second test system, which was performed, was the hexanal/hexanoic<br />
acid assay. In lower concentrations (30 <strong>and</strong> 90 mM) a-terpinene exhibited a strong inhibitory<br />
activity at first but it decreased extremely fast. The inhibitory effect increased with the arising<br />
concentration. a-Terpinene (180 mM) as well as g-terpinene had a blocking action <strong>of</strong> 65% over the<br />
30 days. It should be noticed that the antioxidative activity <strong>of</strong> BHT was stronger compared to any<br />
isolated compound <strong>of</strong> the TTO at lower concentrations.<br />
Vitamin E is a natural antioxidant, which occurs in the plasma red cells <strong>and</strong> tissues, disarms the<br />
free radicals, <strong>and</strong> anticipates the peroxidation <strong>of</strong> polyunsaturated fatty acids <strong>and</strong> phospholipids.<br />
Also vitamin C is one <strong>of</strong> the naturally occurring antioxidants, which actually increase the efficiency<br />
<strong>of</strong> vitamin E to avoid the lipid peroxidation. SOD protects the cells <strong>of</strong> hydrogen peroxide anion free<br />
radicals, furnishes the decrease <strong>of</strong> the catalase which decomposes H 2 O 2 , thus yielding a reduction<br />
<strong>of</strong> the oxidative process. This research shows that the EO <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca armillaris, which has<br />
1,8-cineole as the major chemical compound, can be used as a suppressor for free radicals <strong>and</strong> is<br />
able to avoid damages caused by oxidative stress generated by chemical or physical factors.<br />
Myrtol st<strong>and</strong>ardized <strong>and</strong> eucalyptus oil, which both contain about 70–80% 1,8-cineole, were<br />
examined in a Fenton system which is a very sensitive indicator for ROS such as a-keto-g-methiolbutyric<br />
acid (KMB) or 1-aminocylopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC). OH radicals are generated by
Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 263<br />
the reaction between hydrogen peroxide <strong>and</strong> Fe 2+ (Grassmann et al., 2000). The KMB is transformed<br />
into ethene, carbon dioxide, formiate, <strong>and</strong> dimethyldisulfide. The ethene can be detected in<br />
very low quantities by GC. Both oils prevent KMB before destruction <strong>and</strong> so no ethene can be<br />
detected.<br />
The EOs <strong>of</strong> citrus fruits (Rutaceae)—obtained upon pressing the peels—are also called “agrumen<br />
oils” <strong>and</strong> are characterized normally by a high content <strong>of</strong> the monoterpene hydrocarbon<br />
d-limonene which even after boiling the fruits remains in the peel in a substantial quantity. So,<br />
citrus fruits are a very interesting source for the occurrence <strong>of</strong> antioxidants. Twenty-six citrus fruits<br />
<strong>and</strong> their flavor compounds were investigated for an antioxidative activity by the thiocyanate test.<br />
The EO <strong>of</strong> Citrus sinesis Osbeck var. Sanguinea Tanaka form a Tarocco (Tarocco orange) which<br />
contains as major component limonene (84.5%) shows a very high antioxidative activity <strong>of</strong> about<br />
more than 90%. Also the oil <strong>of</strong> Citrus aurantium Linn. var. cyathifera Y. Tanaka (Dadai) exerts an<br />
antioxidative activity up to 19% but it was slightly weaker than that <strong>of</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ard troxol, a watersoluble<br />
vitamin E derivative. Also all the citrus EOs show an antioxidative activity against linoleic<br />
acid peroxidation (Song et al., 2001). The scavenging activity <strong>of</strong> the authentic compounds was evaluated<br />
in the DPPH test <strong>and</strong> the activity from limonene was assessed from 8.8% to 16.5%, whereas<br />
g-terpinene showed that in this test a noticeable radical scavenging effect for g-terpinene was 84.7%,<br />
which is 3.5 times stronger as that <strong>of</strong> trolox. The results <strong>of</strong> the thiocyanate test reveal that the EOs<br />
<strong>and</strong> their flavor components can be used in the food industry to protect aliments <strong>of</strong> oxidation <strong>and</strong> to<br />
avoid lipid peroxidation. Correlating results are afforded by another investigation <strong>of</strong> 24 different<br />
citrus species <strong>and</strong> their authentic compounds. g-Terpinene showed also in the linoleic acid assay a<br />
very strong antioxidative activity, which manifests itself in a better peroxide value than trolox. The<br />
EOs obtained from Citrus yuko Hort. ex Tanaka (Yuko) <strong>and</strong> Citrus limon Brum. f. cv. Eureka<br />
(Lisbon lemon) contain an appreciable content <strong>of</strong> g-terpinene with 18.6% <strong>and</strong> 8.8%, respectively.<br />
Both citrus species <strong>of</strong>fered a strong antioxidative activity <strong>of</strong> more than 90% due to the high amount<br />
<strong>of</strong> g-terpinene in the oils (Choi et al., 2000). Ao et al. (2008) studied whether EOs from Rutaceae<br />
can effectively scavenge singlet oxygen upon irradiation, using electron spin resonance <strong>and</strong> found<br />
that the investigated 12 oils (eight <strong>of</strong> them obtained by conventional expression, four by steam distillation)<br />
enhanced singlet oxygen production, whereby the content <strong>of</strong> limonene is made responsible<br />
for this result. However, two expressed oils <strong>and</strong> three oils obtained by steam distillation showed<br />
singlet oxygen scavening activity.<br />
The EO <strong>of</strong> Cuminum cyminum (cumin, Apiaceae) consists <strong>of</strong> 21.5% limonene which is able to<br />
abate the concentration <strong>of</strong> the DPPH free radical, although its efficiency is a bit lower than that <strong>of</strong><br />
trolox. Since the EO is also able to decrease the lipid peroxidation, a b-carotene bleaching test was<br />
arranged. This assay furnished better results than the DPPH free radical scavenging test. The possibility<br />
for that could be the higher specificity <strong>of</strong> this test method for lipophilic compounds. a-Pinene<br />
is another major constituent <strong>of</strong> this oil <strong>and</strong> contributes as well to the antioxidative activity. The<br />
implication <strong>of</strong> these investigations is the fact that the EO <strong>of</strong> cumin is competent enough to neutralize<br />
free radicals <strong>and</strong> to protect unsaturated fatty acids <strong>of</strong> oxidation (Gachkar et al., 2007).<br />
Limonene is also one <strong>of</strong> the major compounds <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> Ocotea b<strong>of</strong>o Kunth (Lauraceae, “anis<br />
de arbol” in Ecuador, “moena rosa” in northern Peru or “pau de quiabo” in Brazil), (~5.0%), which<br />
was tested for its antioxidative activity by three different methods. The DPPH assay furnished a<br />
scavenging activity that was higher than that <strong>of</strong> the synthetic reference trolox, but lower than the<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> the natural <strong>and</strong> commercial EO reference Thymus vulgaris, whereas the b-carotene<br />
bleaching test showed that the EO is comparable to st<strong>and</strong>ards in the inhibition <strong>of</strong> oxidation. Another<br />
method was carried out to assess the antioxidative activity using a specific test kit <strong>of</strong> photochemistry.<br />
A light emission curve was recorded over 130 s, using inhibition as the parameter to evaluate the<br />
antioxidant potential (Guerrini et al., 2006). The activity was calculated by the integral under the<br />
curve <strong>and</strong> showed that Ocotea b<strong>of</strong>o EO here has a comparable scavenging activity to trolox. Besides,<br />
also the aromatic monoterpene p-cymene (about 5% in the EO) contributes to the antioxidative<br />
activity (Table 9.4).
264 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 9.4<br />
Antioxidative Activity <strong>of</strong> Ocotea b<strong>of</strong>o EO Performed by DPPH <strong>and</strong><br />
β-Carotene Bleaching Assays<br />
Inhibition %<br />
Sample<br />
DPPH<br />
β-Carotene<br />
Bleaching Test<br />
Photochemiluminescence<br />
(mmol <strong>of</strong> trolox/L)<br />
Ocotea b<strong>of</strong>o EO 64.23 ± 0.03 75.82 ± 0.04 3.14 ± 0.02<br />
Thymus vulgaris EO 75.64 ± 0.04 90.94 ± 0.05 0.34 ± 0.06<br />
BHA 84.35 ± 0.04 86.74 ± 0.04<br />
A-tocopherol 4.28 ± 0.5<br />
Trolox 94.44 ± 0.05 84.60 ± 0.04 3.94 ± 0.06<br />
Salvia (belonging to the family <strong>of</strong> Lamiaceae) EO is used in folk medicine all over the world <strong>and</strong><br />
many studies were carried out to assess its constitution <strong>and</strong> biological activity. Three different species<br />
were collected in the southern part <strong>of</strong> Africa: Salvia stenophylla (blue mountain sage), Salvia<br />
repens (creeping sage), <strong>and</strong> Salvia runcinata (African sage) (Kamatou et al., 2005). Limonene is<br />
one <strong>of</strong> the major compounds <strong>of</strong> the EO from Salvia repens with 9.8%. Interestingly, in the other two<br />
species this monoterpene was absent. The antioxidant behavior <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>and</strong> the phenolic composition<br />
<strong>of</strong> Rosmarinus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis (Lamiaceae) <strong>and</strong> Salvia fruticosa M., both collected in an isl<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
the Ionian Sea (Greece) were investigated. The principal component <strong>of</strong> the EO was 1,8-cineole <strong>and</strong><br />
flavonoids that <strong>of</strong> the methanolic extracts. The phenolic content correlates with the antioxidant<br />
activity (Papageorgiou et al., 2008).<br />
To determine the radical scavenging capacity, a modified DPPH test was used where the test<br />
tubes were analyzed with HPLC. Different concentrations were plated out in a 96-well plate with<br />
control wells containing dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The decolorization was investigated by measuring<br />
the absorbance at 560 nm. Vitamin C provided as a positive control. The LC 50 value <strong>of</strong> Salvia<br />
repens EO (comprising about 22% b-caryophyllene) rests with more than 100.0 mg/mL or Salvia<br />
multicaulis which showed an IC 50 value <strong>of</strong> 17.8 mg/mL, two examples for a low scavenging activity<br />
(Erdemoglu et al., 2006). But the reason for this result could be that in this method a stable free radical<br />
is used while in other investigations unstable radicals were applied <strong>and</strong> there a better antioxidative<br />
activity was adopted.<br />
The EO <strong>of</strong> Crithmum maritimum (= Cachrys maritima, Apiaceae, rock samphire) comprises<br />
limonene <strong>and</strong> g-terpinene with an amount <strong>of</strong> 22.3% <strong>and</strong> 22.9%, respectively, as the major components.<br />
Two different test methods (TBA assay <strong>and</strong> a micellar model system where the antioxidative<br />
activity in different stages <strong>of</strong> the oxidative process <strong>of</strong> the lipid matrix was monitored) were used.<br />
Both assays explain the very high activity <strong>of</strong> this EO. In the TBA assay BHT <strong>and</strong> a-tocopherol were<br />
used as positive st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> the oil showed a better capacity than those substances. Comparable<br />
results were obtained by the micellar method system where the EO acts as a protector <strong>of</strong> the oxidation<br />
<strong>of</strong> linoleic acid <strong>and</strong> inhibits the formation <strong>of</strong> conjugated dienes (Ruberto et al., 2000). The<br />
modification <strong>of</strong> LDL by an oxidative process for instance can lead to atherosclerosis. Natural antioxidants<br />
such as b-carotene, ascorbic acid, a-tocopherol, EOs, <strong>and</strong> so on are able to protect LDL<br />
against this oxidative modification. g-Terpinene proved itself to be the strongest inhibitor <strong>of</strong> all used<br />
authentic compounds for the formation <strong>of</strong> TBARS in the Cu 2+ -induced lipid oxidation system<br />
(Grassmann et al., 2003). So, the addition <strong>of</strong> g-terpinene to food can possibly stop the oxidative<br />
modification <strong>of</strong> LDL <strong>and</strong> reduce the atherosclerosis risk.<br />
a-Pinene <strong>and</strong> a-terpineol are two <strong>of</strong> the main compounds <strong>of</strong> the EO from Juniperus procera<br />
(African juniper, Cupressaceae). The oil was studied for its antioxidative activity, because the aerial<br />
parts <strong>of</strong> this plant are used in traditional medicine against different diseases <strong>and</strong> ailments, for example,
Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 265<br />
ulcers, headaches, stomach disorders, intestinal worms, rheumatic pains, liver diseases, as an<br />
emmenagogue, <strong>and</strong> to heal wounds. To determine the antioxidative activity in vitro test methods<br />
were used: DPPH assay, deoxyribose assay, <strong>and</strong> the assay for nonenzymatic lipid peroxidation. The<br />
EO showed an IC 50 value <strong>of</strong> 14.9 mL/mL in the DPPH assay, a 50% inhibition in the deoxyribose<br />
assay at 0.4 mL/mL, <strong>and</strong> an IC 50 value <strong>of</strong> 0.20 mL/mL by inhibition <strong>of</strong> the lipid peroxidation. On the<br />
other h<strong>and</strong>, pure a-pinene showed an IC 50 value <strong>of</strong> 0.78 mL/mL <strong>and</strong> 50% <strong>of</strong> the lipid peroxidation<br />
were inhibited by 0.51 mL/mL. To determine the inhibition <strong>of</strong> nonenzymatic lipid peroxidation<br />
bovine liposomes, FeCl 3 <strong>and</strong> ascorbic acid were used. The generated aldehydes form pink compounds<br />
with TBA <strong>and</strong> were detected by measuring the absorbance at 532 nm.<br />
Eleven different EOs were investigated for their antioxidative activities. The oils extracted from<br />
Eucalyptus globulus (Eucalyptus, Myrtaceae), Pinus radiata (Monterey Pine, Pinaceae), Piper<br />
crassinervium (Piperaceae), <strong>and</strong> Psidium guajava (Guayava, Myrtaceae) contain 20%, 21.9%, 10%,<br />
<strong>and</strong> 29.5% a-pinene, respectively. Three different test methods were used to evaluate the antioxidative<br />
activities <strong>of</strong> these EOs: DPPH assay, b-carotene bleaching test, <strong>and</strong> photoluminescence.<br />
In the DPPH assay the EO from Piper crassinervium expressed an activity <strong>of</strong> 43.0 ± 0.30%, which<br />
was lower than that <strong>of</strong> the reference Thymus vulgaris EO, but comparable with the activity <strong>of</strong> trolox,<br />
whereas the other oils were almost ineffective. In the b-carotene bleaching test similar data were<br />
obtained. The EOs <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus globulus <strong>and</strong> Piper crassinervium showed results between 66%<br />
<strong>and</strong> 49% inhibition. The photoluminescence test method is very rapid on the photo-induced autoxidation<br />
inhibition <strong>of</strong> luminol by antioxidants mediated from the radical anion superoxide (Sacchetti<br />
et al., 2005). With this method only the EO <strong>of</strong> Piper crassinervium showed an antioxidative activity,<br />
whereas the other oils were almost ineffective.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the main compounds <strong>of</strong> the eucalyptus oil besides 1,8-cineole are the monoterpene hydrocarbons<br />
a-pinene (10–12%), p-cymene, <strong>and</strong> a-terpinene, <strong>and</strong> the monoterpene alcohol linalool.<br />
This oil is used to treat diseases <strong>of</strong> the respiratory tract in which ROS play an important role, so the<br />
antioxidative activity <strong>of</strong> eucalyptus oil was <strong>of</strong> interest. The results obtained by assessing this activity<br />
were compared with those <strong>of</strong> myrtle st<strong>and</strong>ardized oil <strong>of</strong> Myrtus communis (Myrtaceae), which<br />
is also used to combat infections <strong>of</strong> the respiratory tract. The antioxidative activity was determined<br />
by the Fenton test where the OH ∑ -radicals are built from H 2 O 2 , whereas Fe 2+ acts as the electron<br />
donator. The ROS reacts with the sensitive indicators KMB <strong>and</strong> ACC, which release a measurable<br />
signal (Grassmann et al., 2000). After an incubation time <strong>of</strong> 30 min at 37ºC, the generated ethene<br />
can be quantified by GC, because KMB dissociates into ethene, carbon dioxide, formiate, <strong>and</strong><br />
dimethylsulfide. Both, the eucalyptus oil <strong>and</strong> the myrtle st<strong>and</strong>ardized oil were able to inhibit the<br />
generation <strong>of</strong> ethene in dependence on the concentration <strong>of</strong> the oils. In an in vitro system the EO <strong>of</strong><br />
Eucalyptus globulus was investigated for its property to inhibit the autoxidation <strong>of</strong> linoleic acid <strong>and</strong><br />
compared with the activity <strong>of</strong> BHT <strong>and</strong> showed very good protection for linoleic acid with an IC 50<br />
value <strong>of</strong> 7 mg. In another test the inhibition <strong>of</strong> the nonenzymatic lipid peroxidation was investigated.<br />
A solution <strong>of</strong> bovine brain extract <strong>and</strong> various concentrations <strong>of</strong> linalool were submitted to a TBA<br />
assay: Linalool caused a 50% inhibition at a concentration <strong>of</strong> 0.67 mL/mL.<br />
The EO, obtained from the leaves <strong>of</strong> Origanum syriacum L. (Syrian oregano, Lamiaceae), is a<br />
very popular Arab spice which is used as a herbal (traditional) medicament, flavor, fragrance, <strong>and</strong><br />
for aromatherapy in form <strong>of</strong> bath, massage, steam inhalation, <strong>and</strong> vaporization (Alma et al., 2003),<br />
was investigated with regard to the antioxidative activity <strong>of</strong> its chemical compounds, for example,<br />
g-terpinene, p-cymene, <strong>and</strong> b-caryophyllene (about 28%, 16%, <strong>and</strong> 13% respectively) using the thiocyanate<br />
method, DPPH radical scavenging activity, <strong>and</strong> the reducing power. The latter property was<br />
determined in a concentration from 100 to 500 mg/L <strong>and</strong> compared with the reducing power <strong>of</strong><br />
ascorbic acid. The EO was able to increase the absorbance but the reducing power is lower than that<br />
<strong>of</strong> the used st<strong>and</strong>ard. It should be noticed that the power <strong>of</strong> the EO increased with a higher concentration.<br />
Also in the DPPH assay the st<strong>and</strong>ard BHT showed a better radical scavenging than the EO.<br />
In addition, 500 mg/L EO scavenged only 17% DPPH. In comparison to that, BHT showed an activity<br />
<strong>of</strong> 82% in a concentration <strong>of</strong> 100 mg/L, again dependent on the concentration. The thiocyanate
266 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
test was carried out with concentrations <strong>of</strong> 20, 40, <strong>and</strong> 60 mg/L <strong>of</strong> the EO. Also here the activity<br />
increased with a higher concentration. The antioxidative activity was comparable to that <strong>of</strong> BHT.<br />
Even at low concentrations (20 mg/L) a high antioxidative activity was found. At least also the<br />
reducing power <strong>of</strong> the EO using potassium ferricyanide was assessed by measuring the absorbance<br />
at 700 nm; however, the EO attained only a reducing power <strong>of</strong> 0.77, compared with that <strong>of</strong> ascorbic<br />
acid with a value <strong>of</strong> 0.96. Because an increasing absorbance means a stronger reducing power, it was<br />
shown that in this case only a low reducing capacity could be recorded, as in the method with<br />
DPPH. The EO <strong>of</strong> Origanum fl oribundum comprises only 8.4% thymol, but about 30% <strong>of</strong> carvacrol.<br />
This oil was able to decrease the generation <strong>of</strong> TBARS in the TBA assay just as well as BHT, BHA,<br />
<strong>and</strong> a-tocopherol, in the absence <strong>and</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> a radical inducer. The DPPH radical activity <strong>of</strong><br />
oregano EO in a menthol extract exists, because it is able to reduce the stable free radical DPPH<br />
with values <strong>of</strong> IC 50 ranging from 378 to 826 mg/L, however inferior to the capacity <strong>of</strong> BHA (Hazzit<br />
et al., 2006). Similar results also furnished the carvacrol-rich oil from Origanum gl<strong>and</strong>ulosum<br />
(Algerian oregano) <strong>and</strong> from Origanum acutidens (hops oregano). This EO was tested with the radical<br />
scavenging method using DPPH <strong>and</strong> the b-carotene/linoleic assay. In both test systems the oil<br />
exhibits an antioxidative activity. As shown in other investigations, the activity in the b-carotene/<br />
linoleic assay was higher than that in the DPPH assay <strong>and</strong> is comparable with the ability <strong>of</strong> BHT,<br />
which was used as a positive control.<br />
Also the species oregano (Origanum vulgare) is characterized by a high content <strong>of</strong> thymol (33%)<br />
<strong>and</strong> carvacrol, as was shown by a GC-MS analysis <strong>of</strong> (oregano) EO. The property to inhibit the<br />
generation <strong>of</strong> malonic aldehyde in the first stage <strong>of</strong> lipid oxidation is determined by TBA test<br />
method. And the micellar model system is used to measure the decrease <strong>of</strong> conjugated dienes formed<br />
by linoleic acid spectrophotometrically at 234 nm. In a concentration <strong>of</strong> 640–800 mg/L the EO<br />
shows a protective activity, which is superior to the st<strong>and</strong>ard substances BHA <strong>and</strong> a-tocopherol but<br />
equal to BHT. When the amount <strong>of</strong> the EO is increased to 1000 mg/L, the antioxidative capacity is<br />
better than that <strong>of</strong> BHT (Faleiro et al., 2005). The meat <strong>of</strong> poultry is very sensitive for oxidative<br />
deterioration because the meat is rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids. Turkeys are more sensitive<br />
than chicken because they cannot store a-tocopherol in their tissues to the same extent. A study was<br />
carried out if a diet with the EO <strong>of</strong> Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum (oregano) is able to degrade the<br />
susceptibility to lipid oxidation. Thirty 10-week-old female turkeys were divided into five groups.<br />
In the control group the animals were fed with a st<strong>and</strong>ard diet. The other turkeys were also fed with<br />
the same bush but containing different concentrations <strong>of</strong> oregano EO <strong>and</strong> oregano herbs: 5 g oregano<br />
herb/kg, 10 g oregano herb/kg, 100 mg oregano EO, <strong>and</strong> 200 mg EO. After 4 weeks all the turkeys<br />
were slaughtered <strong>and</strong> worked up. The breasts were tight, minced, <strong>and</strong> stored at 4°C over 9 days. At<br />
days 0, 3, 6, <strong>and</strong> 9 the concentration <strong>of</strong> malonic aldehyde was measured spectrophotometrically<br />
using the TBA assay. At each stage the control group showed the highest content <strong>of</strong> malonic aldehyde.<br />
On the third day the amount <strong>of</strong> malonic aldehyde increased in every group. The group with<br />
100 mg EO addition showed a lower concentration than the control group but a higher one as the<br />
group with 200 mg EO. On the sixth day the content <strong>of</strong> malonic aldehyde also increased <strong>and</strong> similar<br />
to the previous sample the group with 200 mg EO had the lowest content. Thus, it is shown that a<br />
diet with oregano EO can delay the deterioration induced by lipid oxidation (Botsoglou et al., 2003;<br />
Florou-Paneri et al., 2005). Responsible for this result is carvacrol, which is one <strong>of</strong> the main compounds<br />
<strong>of</strong> the oil <strong>and</strong> exerts also in other studies a strong antioxidative activity. In conclusion, these<br />
results prove that the EO <strong>of</strong> Origanum vulgare possesses protective properties in the first <strong>and</strong> second<br />
step <strong>of</strong> lipid peroxidation <strong>and</strong> can be used to replace synthetic antioxidants in the food industry<br />
or other areas. Another species, namely Origanum majorana L. from Albania, showed in the DPPH<br />
test a better antiradical activity than the phenolic compound thymol. This EO exhibited a scavenging<br />
effect on the hydroxyl radical OH as well <strong>and</strong> finally was also capable <strong>of</strong> antioxidant activity in<br />
a linoleic acid emulsion system where at a concentration <strong>of</strong> 0.05% it inhibited conjugated dienes<br />
formation by 50% <strong>and</strong> the generation <strong>of</strong> linoleic acid secondary oxidized products by about 80%<br />
(Schmidt et al., 2008).
Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 267<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the main compounds with about 23% found in the volatile oil from Trachyspermum ammi<br />
(ajwain, ajowan, omum, Apiaceae), which is a very popular aromatic plant in India <strong>and</strong> used for<br />
flavoring food as well as in the Ayurvedic medicine, is g-terpinene. Another main compound <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ajowan oil is p-cymene (about 31%), which contributes to the antispamodic <strong>and</strong> carminative properties<br />
as well. To determine the antioxidative activity <strong>of</strong> the EO a wide range <strong>of</strong> test methods were<br />
used. To simulate the different stages <strong>of</strong> lipid peroxidation three different test methods were exerted:<br />
the determination <strong>of</strong> peroxide values, a TBA assay, <strong>and</strong> the linoleic acid assay. The antioxidative<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> the oil <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> an acetone extract was compared to that <strong>of</strong> BHT, BHA, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> a control:<br />
a sample with crude linseed oil. It could be shown that the oil was a better inhibitor than the synthetic<br />
antioxidants (Singh et al., 2004). Due to the fact that all results <strong>of</strong> the different test methods<br />
correlate, it can be concluded that at a concentration <strong>of</strong> 200 ppm the inhibitor activity can be put into<br />
the following order: acetone extract > EO > BHA > BHT > control.<br />
Terpinolene was identified as one <strong>of</strong> the main compounds (about 6%) in the EO from Curcuma<br />
longa (turmeric, Zingiberaceae). In the course <strong>of</strong> an investigation <strong>of</strong> 11 different EOs also turmeric<br />
oil was determined for its antioxidative activity. The EO <strong>of</strong> Curcuma longa showed a noteworthy<br />
scavenging activity <strong>of</strong> about 62%, an antioxidative activity twice <strong>of</strong> that <strong>of</strong> trolox but only marginally<br />
lower than that <strong>of</strong> reference oil from Thymus vulgaris. Also the b-carotene bleaching test<br />
furnished comparable results, namely an inhibition activity <strong>of</strong> 72% versus 91% <strong>of</strong> Thymus vulgaris<br />
oil <strong>and</strong> 87% <strong>of</strong> BHA. This prevention <strong>of</strong> oxidation was also shown by the photoluminescence test<br />
method that is based on the photo-induced autoxidation inhibition <strong>of</strong> luminol by antioxidants mediated<br />
from the radical anion superoxide (Sacchetti et al., 2004). The EO <strong>of</strong> Curcuma longa showed<br />
a noticeable inhibition activity <strong>of</strong> about 28 mmol trolox/L.<br />
The protective effect <strong>of</strong> terpinolene with reference to the lipoproteins <strong>of</strong> human blood <strong>and</strong> compared<br />
to that <strong>of</strong> the well-known antioxidative substances, such as a-tocopherol <strong>and</strong> b-carotene, was<br />
investigated. The oxidative modification <strong>of</strong> LDL, which was obtained from the blood <strong>of</strong> healthy<br />
volunteers, can be detected with the use <strong>of</strong> the increasing absorbance at 234 nm. An elongation <strong>of</strong><br />
the time until rapid extinction (lag-phase) exhibits an antioxidative activity. The longer the lag-phase<br />
lasts, the better is the antioxidative capacity. Similar to other test systems with other EOs, the antioxidative<br />
capacity is dependent on the concentration. In that case a higher concentration <strong>of</strong> terpinolene<br />
means that the LDL particles are better loaded with terpinolene molecules. The result <strong>of</strong> this<br />
investigation proved that the protective <strong>and</strong> thus the antioxidative activity <strong>of</strong> terpinolene is only a bit<br />
weaker than that <strong>of</strong> the most common antioxidant a-tocopherol.<br />
In the course <strong>of</strong> the determination <strong>of</strong> the antioxidative activity <strong>of</strong> the EOs obtained from 34 different<br />
citrus species <strong>and</strong> the main compounds <strong>of</strong> the oils, among them terpinolene, were investigated<br />
for their radical scavenging activity in a DPPH test system. Terpinolene <strong>of</strong>fers a scavenging power<br />
<strong>of</strong> 87%, which was much higher than the antioxidative activity <strong>of</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ard trolox. Terpinolene<br />
also showed a relative lipid peroxidation rate <strong>of</strong> 18%, which is an indication <strong>of</strong> a superior antioxidative<br />
activity, because the relative lipid peroxidation rate <strong>of</strong>fered by the well-known <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten used<br />
antioxidant a-tocopherol was about 30%.<br />
The leaves, flowers, <strong>and</strong> stems <strong>of</strong> Satureja hortensis (summer savory, Lamiaceae), a common<br />
plant widely spread in Turkey, are used as tea or as addition to foods on account <strong>of</strong> the aroma <strong>and</strong><br />
the flavor. As a medical plant it is known for its antispasmodic, antidiarrheal, antioxidant, sedative,<br />
<strong>and</strong> antimicrobial properties. Also this EO was investigated for its antioxidative properties. The<br />
GC-MS analysis showed that besides 9% p-cymene, carvacrol <strong>and</strong> thymol are the main compounds<br />
<strong>of</strong> about 22 constituents <strong>of</strong> the oil. They occur at a ratio <strong>of</strong> approximately 1:1, which is representative<br />
for the genus Satureja, namely 29% <strong>of</strong> thymol <strong>and</strong> 27% <strong>of</strong> carvacrol. In a linoleic acid test system<br />
the EO showed an inhibition activity <strong>of</strong> 95%, this is an indicator for a strong antioxidative activity<br />
because the control BHT attained an inhibition <strong>of</strong> 96% (Güllüce et al., 2003). Thymol is one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
main components <strong>of</strong> the EO from Satureja montana L., ssp. montana (savory) <strong>and</strong> also one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
glycosidically bound volatile aglycones that were found. The EO with 45% thymol shows a very<br />
strong antioxidative capacity that was a bit lower than the st<strong>and</strong>ards, BHT, <strong>and</strong> a-tocopherol. The
268 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
activity <strong>of</strong> the isolated glycosides is similar to that <strong>of</strong> the EO. Identification <strong>of</strong> the volatile aglycone<br />
shows a value <strong>of</strong> 2.5% thymol (R<strong>and</strong>onic et al., 2003). To evaluate the antioxidative properties <strong>of</strong><br />
ingredients, EO <strong>and</strong> glycosides, the b-carotene bleaching test was chosen. The DPPH assay yields a<br />
weaker result than the b-carotene bleaching test, in which the EO had an efficiency <strong>of</strong> inhibition<br />
about 95%. Compared to the inhibition from BHT <strong>of</strong> 96%, this result shows a high antioxidative<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> the EO, due to the high content <strong>of</strong> thymol <strong>and</strong> carvacrol.<br />
Since Nigella sativa (black cumin, devil in the bush, fennel flower, Ranunculaceae) seeds are<br />
used for the treatment <strong>of</strong> inflammations it was reasonable to investigate the ability <strong>of</strong> the volatile oil<br />
to act as a radical scavenger (Burits <strong>and</strong> Bucar, 2000). Experiments have shown that Nigella oil <strong>and</strong><br />
the main compounds are able to inhibit in liposomes the nonenzymatic lipid peroxidation. Besides<br />
carvacrol (6–12%) thymoquinone, p-cymene is one <strong>of</strong> the major constituents <strong>of</strong> the oil (7–15%). In<br />
the free radical DPPH test the EO showed to be a very weak scavenger for radicals (IC 50 value:<br />
460.0 mg/ml). Totally contrary results were furnished by the TBA assay: the volatile oil <strong>of</strong> Nigella<br />
seeds exhibited a very strong inhibition capacity, namely at a concentration <strong>of</strong> 0.0011 mg/ml already<br />
50% <strong>of</strong> the lipid peroxidation could be stopped.<br />
As to the next oil a scientific confusion must be mentioned: the common name black caraway<br />
belongs to the seeds <strong>of</strong> Nigella sativa (Ranunculaceae) <strong>and</strong> not to the Apiaceae plant Carum.<br />
Therefore, Carum nigrum is a wrong botanical name, even if the seeds <strong>of</strong> N. sativa are black <strong>and</strong><br />
resemble to the seeds <strong>of</strong> Carum carvi. The confusion that has been created by the authors <strong>of</strong> the<br />
articles (Singh et al., 2006) by using possibly local justified terms, but nevertheless wrong botanical<br />
names still persists.<br />
The EO <strong>of</strong> Carum nigrum (black caraway) comprising, for example, thymol (~19%), b-caryophyllene<br />
(~8%), <strong>and</strong> germacrene D (~21%), <strong>and</strong> its oleoresin were able to scavenge free radicals in the<br />
DPPH assay with an effect <strong>of</strong> 41–71% <strong>and</strong> 50–80%, respectively. This can be compared with the<br />
efficiency <strong>of</strong> BHT <strong>and</strong> BHA. However, this activity could only be observed using a high concentration<br />
<strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>and</strong> oleoresin not in lower ones. A good antioxidative activity was assessed also by the<br />
other tests: the linoleic acid assay exhibited that the EO <strong>and</strong> oleoresin are able to decrease the rate <strong>of</strong><br />
peroxide during the incubation time. The deoxyribose assay proved that both EO <strong>and</strong> oleoresin are<br />
able to prevent the formation <strong>of</strong> hydrogen peroxides dependently <strong>of</strong> the concentration. Also the<br />
chelating effect with iron was screened <strong>and</strong> the absorbance <strong>of</strong> the mixture determined at 485 nm<br />
(Singh et al., 2006). A mixture <strong>of</strong> this EO, the oleoresin, <strong>and</strong> crude mustard oil were studied to assess<br />
the generated peroxides as well as the TBA value was measured in order to determine secondary<br />
products <strong>of</strong> the oxidation. This mixture showed a clear antioxidative activity, better than the control,<br />
<strong>and</strong> in the linoleic system were also able to keep the amount <strong>of</strong> the peroxides, formed by the oxidation<br />
<strong>of</strong> linoleic acid, very low in comparison to the st<strong>and</strong>ard antioxidants BHA <strong>and</strong> BHT. Finally, the<br />
rather moderate chelating capacity could—nevertheless—be beneficial for the food industry because<br />
ferrous ions are the most effective pro-oxidants in food systems (Singh et al., 2006).<br />
The EO <strong>of</strong> Monarda citriodora var. citriodora (lemon bee balm, Lamiaceae) contains about 10%<br />
p-cymene. The oil was determined for its antioxidative activity in two different in vitro test systems.<br />
In one the oxidation <strong>of</strong> lipids was induced by Fe 2+ <strong>and</strong> in the other assay AAPH was used. Oxygen<br />
in the presence <strong>of</strong> iron(II) generates superoxide anion radicals. In the aqueous phase AAPH undergoes<br />
steady-state decomposition into carbon-centered free radicals (Dorman <strong>and</strong> Deans, 2004). The<br />
oil <strong>of</strong> Monarda citriodora was active oil at concentrations <strong>of</strong> 50 <strong>and</strong> 100 ppm. In the test system<br />
where the radicals were built from AAPH, the oil <strong>of</strong> Monarda citriodora showed a concentrationdependent<br />
pattern <strong>of</strong> antioxidative activity. Monarda citriodora showed a better activity at 10 ppm<br />
than the EO <strong>of</strong> Thymus zygis <strong>and</strong> an equal inhibition power like Origanum vulgare but the activity<br />
was lower than that <strong>of</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ards BHT <strong>and</strong> BHA. The EO obtained from the stem with leaves <strong>and</strong><br />
the flowers <strong>of</strong> Monarda didyma L. (golden balm or honey balm, Lamiaceae) contains p-cymene,<br />
10.5% in the stem with leaves <strong>and</strong> 9.7% in the flowers. The EO was studied by two different test<br />
methods to determine its antioxidative activity. The EO showed a good free radical scavenging
Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 269<br />
activity in the DPPH assay. Also the properties to inhibit the lipid peroxidation in the 5-lipogenase<br />
test system furnished a strong inhibition that is similar to BHT.<br />
In some Mediterranean countries Thymbra spicata (spiked thyme, Lamiaceae) is applied as spice<br />
for different meals <strong>and</strong> as herbal tea. Two <strong>of</strong> the main compounds <strong>of</strong> the EO from this plant are<br />
carvacrol (86%) <strong>and</strong> thymol (4%). The investigation <strong>of</strong> different natural antioxidants becomes more<br />
<strong>and</strong> more interesting in order to attain more safety in the food industry. The lipid oxidation may be<br />
one <strong>of</strong> the reasons for different changes in the quality <strong>of</strong> meat <strong>and</strong> thus the addition <strong>of</strong> Thymus<br />
spicata EO has a positive influence on its quality. As material <strong>of</strong> examination served the Turkish<br />
meal sucuk, which is prepared <strong>of</strong> lamb, lamb tail fat, beef, salt, sugar, clean dry garlic spices, <strong>and</strong><br />
olive oil. During ripening on the days 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 13, <strong>and</strong> 15, a sample was taken <strong>and</strong> different<br />
parameters were determined, among them was also TBARS. They were detected spectrophotometrically<br />
by measuring the absorbance at 538 nm. During the first 8 days the TBARS increased<br />
from 0.18 to 1.14 mg/kg. The addition <strong>of</strong> Thymus spicata EO reduced the value <strong>of</strong> TBARS more<br />
than BHT. This result shows that the EO from Thymus spicata exerts a safety effect on the quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> the meat <strong>and</strong> thus can be used as a natural antioxidant in the food industry. The EO <strong>of</strong> Thymbra<br />
capitata (conehead thyme, Lamiaceae) collected in Portugal contains 68% carvacrol. Both the oil<br />
<strong>and</strong> carvacrol were tested for their antioxidative activity together with sunflower oil via the assessment<br />
<strong>of</strong> liberated iodine <strong>and</strong> its titration with sodium thiosulfate solution in the presence <strong>of</strong> starch<br />
as an indicator (Miguel et al., 2003). The antioxidative capacity was determined by the peroxide<br />
value <strong>of</strong> the samples, which were taken continuously during a period when the test solution was<br />
stored at 60°C. The EO <strong>and</strong> carvacrol exhibit approximately the same antioxidative activity during<br />
a period <strong>of</strong> 36 days.<br />
It is known that free radicals induce deterioration <strong>of</strong> food because they start the chain reaction <strong>of</strong><br />
the oxidation <strong>of</strong> polyunsaturated fatty acids. Zataria multifl ora (Zataria, Lamiaceae) is used for<br />
flavoring yoghurt <strong>and</strong> as a medical plant, <strong>and</strong> therefore aroused the interest to study also the biological<br />
activities <strong>of</strong> its EO. Using the ammonium thiocyanate method this oil exhibits a strong antioxidative<br />
activity, as could be shown in an experiment. To determine the inhibition <strong>of</strong> oxidation,<br />
ammonium thiocyanate <strong>and</strong> ferrous chloride were added <strong>and</strong> the absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically<br />
at 500 nm. BHT was used for the positive control. Thymol with about 38% the main<br />
compound <strong>of</strong> this EO shows a very strong capacity to avoid the lipid peroxidation up to 80%, which<br />
is close to the inhibition <strong>of</strong> BHT (97.8%). The high content <strong>of</strong> thymol, carvacrol (38%), <strong>and</strong> g-terpinene<br />
is the reason for the excellent antioxidative activity. In the DPPH assay the results were less<br />
convincing. The EO <strong>of</strong> Zataria multifl ora is more liable to prevent lipid peroxidation than scavenging<br />
free radicals. The value <strong>of</strong> conjugated dienes is also decreased by the oil.<br />
Linalool is one <strong>of</strong> the main compounds (up to 15%) <strong>of</strong> the EO obtained from Rosmarinus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis<br />
L. (rosemary, Lamiaceae). The EO was tested using two different methods: radical scavenging<br />
with the DPPH assay <strong>and</strong> the b-carotene bleaching test. The oil was able to reduce the stable free<br />
radical DPPH <strong>and</strong> showed a slightly weaker scavenging activity than the st<strong>and</strong>ard trolox. But the<br />
efficiency <strong>of</strong> rosemary oil was clearly weaker than that <strong>of</strong> the reference oil Thymus porlock. By the<br />
b-carotene bleaching test it could be shown that this EO has the ability to prevent the lipid peroxidation<br />
with a capacity close to the used st<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />
The genus Ocimum contains various species <strong>and</strong> the EOs are used as an appendage in food,<br />
cosmetics, <strong>and</strong> toiletries. Ocimum basilicum (sweet basil, Lamiaceae) is used fresh or dried as a<br />
food spice nearly all over the world. The antioxidative activities <strong>of</strong> different Ocimum species were<br />
studied in order to assess the potential to substitute synthetic antioxidants. Linalool <strong>and</strong> eugenol<br />
(~12%) are the main compounds in the diverse oils. In the HPLC-based xanthine–xanthine assay,<br />
the EO <strong>of</strong> Ocimum basilicum var. purpurascens (dark opal basil) contains linalool, eugenol, <strong>and</strong><br />
b-caryophyllene as main compounds <strong>and</strong> shows a very strong antioxidative capacity with an IC 50<br />
value <strong>of</strong> 1.84 mL (Salles-Trevisan et al., 2006). Linalool as a pure substance yielded the same test<br />
results. In the DPPH assay linalool showed a bit weaker activity than in the xanthine–xanthine test
270 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
method. Ocimum micranthum (least basil) is original in the South <strong>and</strong> Central American tropics<br />
<strong>and</strong> is used in these territories as a culinary <strong>and</strong> medical plant. The EO comprises eugenol (up to<br />
51%) as main compound. In the DPPH assay the EO was able to scavenge about 77% <strong>of</strong> the free<br />
DPPH radicals, which is 3 times stronger than that <strong>of</strong> trolox. The efficiency was also better than<br />
those <strong>of</strong> Ocimum basilicum (basil) commercial EO <strong>and</strong> only slightly weaker than those <strong>of</strong> Thymus<br />
vulgaris (thyme) commercial EO. These two EOs were used as a st<strong>and</strong>ard because <strong>of</strong> their known<br />
antioxidative activity (Sacchetti et al., 2004). The b-carotene bleaching test proved that the EO<br />
inhibited the lipid peroxidation up to 93% after an incubation time <strong>of</strong> 60 min. The antioxidative<br />
activity determined in this test is better than the activity <strong>of</strong> BHA. In a special test using the photochemoluminescence<br />
method the EO <strong>of</strong> Ocimum micranthum attained a 10 times better antioxidative<br />
activity as Ocimum basilicum <strong>and</strong> Thymus vulgaris commercial EO. These data are <strong>of</strong><br />
significance because the results <strong>of</strong> this assay correlate easily with the therapeutic, nutritional, <strong>and</strong><br />
cosmetic potential <strong>of</strong> a given antioxidant <strong>and</strong> the capability to quench O 2<br />
•−<br />
is useful to describe the<br />
related capacity to counteract ROS-induced damages to the body (Sacchetti et al., 2004). Furthermore,<br />
the antioxidative activities <strong>of</strong> the EOs obtained from Thymus vulgaris <strong>and</strong> Ocimum basilicum were<br />
determined by the aldehyde/carboxylic acid assay. Various amounts <strong>of</strong> the EOs were added to a<br />
dichloromethane solution <strong>of</strong> hexanal-containing undecane as a GC internal st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>and</strong> the antioxidant-st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
substances BHT <strong>and</strong> a-tocopherol (Lee et al., 2005). After 5 days the concentration<br />
<strong>of</strong> hexane was determined. All samples showed good antioxidative properties as well as pure<br />
eugenol furnishing an inhibition <strong>of</strong> the hexanal oxidation by 32%.<br />
Linalool (~12%), limonene (~18%), <strong>and</strong> a-terpineol (~2%) are the main volatile compounds in an<br />
infusion prepared <strong>of</strong> the green leaves from Illex paraguariensis (mate, Aquifoliaceae). In order to<br />
determine the protective activity against the oxidation <strong>of</strong> lipids, the infusion was submitted to the<br />
ferric thiocyanate test. It could be seen that the infusion <strong>of</strong> green mate shows similar antioxidative<br />
activity as the synthetic antioxidant BHT (Bastos-Markowizc et al.,2006).<br />
The leaves <strong>and</strong> barks <strong>of</strong> Cinnamomum zeylanicum Blume syn. Cinnamomum verum (cinnamon,<br />
Lauraceae) are widely used as spice, flavoring agent in foods, <strong>and</strong> in various applications in<br />
medicine (Schmidt et al., 2006). The leaf oil is very rich in eugenol (up to 75%). To investigate the<br />
antioxidative activity five different methods were used: scavenging effect on DPPH, detection <strong>of</strong><br />
the hydroxyl radicals by deoxyribose assay, evaluation <strong>of</strong> the antioxidant activity in the linoleic<br />
acid model system, determination <strong>of</strong> conjugated dienes formation, <strong>and</strong> determination <strong>of</strong> the<br />
TBARS. In the DPPH radical scavenging assay the EO showed an inhibition <strong>of</strong> 94% at a concentration<br />
<strong>of</strong> 8.0 mg/mL. To reach a radical scavenging activity <strong>of</strong> 89% a concentration <strong>of</strong> 20.0 mg/mL<br />
was necessary, which is comparable to the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ard compounds BHT or BHA.<br />
The EO also exhibits a very strong inhibition <strong>of</strong> the hydroxyl radicals in the deoxyribose assay.<br />
The oil prevented 90% at 0.1 mg/mL <strong>and</strong> eugenol causes a blocking <strong>of</strong> 71% at the same concentration.<br />
Quercetin, which was used in this method as a positive control, showed a weaker efficiency.<br />
In a modified deoxyribose assay, in which FeCl 3 is added to the sample, both the EO <strong>and</strong> eugenol<br />
showed an antioxidative activity. The EO <strong>and</strong> eugenol were able to chelate the Fe 3+ ions <strong>and</strong> so the<br />
degradation <strong>of</strong> deoxyribose was prevented. To assess the oxidation <strong>of</strong> linoleic acid the determination<br />
<strong>of</strong> the conjugated diene content <strong>and</strong> TBARS were used. Cinnamon EO is able to inhibit the<br />
generation <strong>of</strong> conjugated dienes. In a concentration <strong>of</strong> 0.01% the formation <strong>of</strong> conjugated dienes<br />
is avoided (up to 57%) similar to the efficiency <strong>of</strong> BHT (~59%). On the day 5 <strong>of</strong> linoleic acid<br />
storage, malonic aldehyde was detected with TBARS. The cinnamon oil showed an inhibitory<br />
action <strong>of</strong> 76% at a concentration <strong>of</strong> 0.01% oil compared with the 76% <strong>of</strong> BHT at the same<br />
concentration.<br />
Another Lauraceae is Laurus nobilis (laurel). The EO obtained from the leaves <strong>of</strong> wild grown<br />
shrubs is characterized by a very high content <strong>of</strong> eugenol. The biological activities, especially the<br />
antioxidative properties, <strong>of</strong> the extract were studied in different in vitro test methods. The scavenging<br />
capacity in the DPPH assay yielded an IC 50 value <strong>of</strong> 0.113 mg/mL. Also the b-carotene bleaching<br />
test <strong>of</strong> the nonpolar fractions was able to protect the lipids from oxidation. After an incubation
Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 271<br />
time <strong>of</strong> 60 min an IC 50 value <strong>of</strong> 1 mg/mL was calculated. The last applied method to determine the<br />
antioxidative activity used liposomes obtained from bovine brain extract. This test <strong>of</strong>fers a high<br />
antioxidative activity with an IC 50 value <strong>of</strong> 115.0 mg/mL. The high content <strong>of</strong> eugenol renders it possible<br />
to use Laurus nobilis leaf extract as a natural antioxidant. Similar results <strong>of</strong> the antioxidative<br />
power were found using the FRAP assay <strong>and</strong> the DPPH assay <strong>of</strong> the EO obtained from Laurus<br />
nobilis leaves collected in Dalmatia (Conforti et al., 2003). In the first test system the change in<br />
absorbance at 593 nm owing to the formation <strong>of</strong> blue-colored Fe III tripyridyltriazine from a colorless<br />
Fe III form by the action <strong>of</strong> electron-donating antioxidants was measured. The sample was incubated<br />
at 37ºC <strong>and</strong> over a defined period the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) values were determined.<br />
Using the DPPH assay the EO <strong>of</strong> Laurus nobilis exhibited an antioxidative activity <strong>of</strong> nearly<br />
90% at a concentration <strong>of</strong> 20 g/L, which is near to the activity <strong>of</strong> BHT with 91%.<br />
Many aromatic herbs are used as an aroma additive in foodstuffs <strong>and</strong> in fat-containing food<br />
systems to prevent or delay some chemical deteriorations occurring during the storage (Politeo<br />
et al., 2006). For the investigation <strong>of</strong> the antioxidative activities <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>of</strong> Syzygium aromaticum<br />
(cloves, Myrtaceae), three variable tests methods were employed: TBA assay, radical scavenging<br />
with DPPH, <strong>and</strong> the determination <strong>of</strong> FRAP. In all three assays it was found that the cloves<br />
EO—probably on account <strong>of</strong> its high content <strong>of</strong> eugenol (up to 91%)—shows a noticeable antioxidative<br />
activity. The determination <strong>of</strong> the FRAP assay measures the aforementioned change in absorbance<br />
at 593 nm owing to the formation <strong>of</strong> blue-colored Fe III tripyridyltriazine (Politeo et al., 2006).<br />
In the radical scavenging test with DPPH an inhibition capacity <strong>of</strong> 91% at 5.0 mg/mL was found for<br />
the EO. Pure eugenol, BHT, <strong>and</strong> BHA needed a concentration <strong>of</strong> 20 mg/mL to arrive at the same<br />
result. In the deoxyribose assay the EO furnished a hydroxyl radical scavenging <strong>of</strong> about 94% at<br />
0.2 mg/mL. The inhibitory effect <strong>of</strong> eugenol was 91% at a concentration <strong>of</strong> 0.6 mg/ml. Quercetin, the<br />
positive control, showed an inhibition <strong>of</strong> 77.8% at 20.0 mg/mL. The capture <strong>of</strong> OH • by cloves oil is<br />
attributed to the hydrogen-donating ability <strong>of</strong> the phenolic compound eugenol, which is found in a<br />
high concentration in the EO (Jirovetz et al., 2006). In a linoleic acid model system the inhibition <strong>of</strong><br />
generated hydroxy peroxides in the early stages <strong>of</strong> the oxidation <strong>of</strong> linoleic acid <strong>and</strong> the secondary<br />
oxidized products were detected by two different indicators: The adoption <strong>of</strong> conjugated dienes <strong>and</strong><br />
TBARS. At a concentration <strong>of</strong> 0.005% the cloves oil outbid the activity <strong>of</strong> BHT. The capacity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
EO was about 74% compared to 59% achieved by BHT at 0.001%. The same results were obtained<br />
by the determination <strong>of</strong> TBARS. Here the EO’s activity was also equal to BHT.<br />
Melissa <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L. (lemon balm, Lamiaceae) is a well-known herb <strong>and</strong> is also used as a medicinal<br />
plant for the treatment <strong>of</strong> different diseases such as headache, gastrointestinal disorders, nervousness,<br />
<strong>and</strong> rheumatism. The EO is well known for its antibacterial <strong>and</strong> antifungal properties, so<br />
it was investigated for its antioxidative activity too (Mimica-Dukic et al., 2004). The analyses <strong>of</strong> the<br />
chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the EO showed that b-caryophyllene is one <strong>of</strong> the main compounds (~4.6%)<br />
besides geranial, neral, citronellal, <strong>and</strong> linalool. The free radical scavenging capacity was determined<br />
by the DPPH assay, the protection <strong>of</strong> lipid peroxidation was investigated with the TBA assay,<br />
<strong>and</strong> the scavenging activity <strong>of</strong> the oil for hydroxyl radicals was measured with the deoxyribose<br />
assay, also a rapid screening for the scavenging compounds was made. Lemon balm scavenged in<br />
the DPPH test 50% <strong>of</strong> the radicals at a concentration <strong>of</strong> 7.58 mg/mL compared with the st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
BHT, which attained an IC 50 value <strong>of</strong> 5.37 mg/mL. At a concentration <strong>of</strong> 2.13 mg/mL the highest<br />
inhibition (about 60%) <strong>of</strong> generated hydroxyl radicals in the deoxyribose assay was found compared<br />
with BHT as a positive control (~19%). Strong antioxidative activity <strong>of</strong> the EO was also determined<br />
in the TBA test system, where the inhibition <strong>of</strong> the lipid peroxidation was determined. Sixty-seven<br />
percent inhibition was caused by 2.13 mg/mL EO, in comparison with 37% <strong>of</strong> BHT. A rapid screening<br />
for the scavenging capacity with DPPH on a TLC plate exhibited that caryophyllene is one <strong>of</strong><br />
the most active compounds.<br />
Croton urucurana (Euphorbiaceae) is known as “dragon’s blood” <strong>and</strong> is used in traditional medicine<br />
because <strong>of</strong> its wound <strong>and</strong> ulcer healing, antidiarrheic, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant,<br />
<strong>and</strong> antirheumatic properties. The antioxidative fractions <strong>of</strong> the EO obtained were determined with
272 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
a rapid screening using the DPPH assay on TLC. The main compound <strong>of</strong> the most active fraction was<br />
a-bisabolol with 38.3%. The isolated fraction exhibited a 50% radical scavenging activity at a concentration<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1.05 mg/mL. This is a lower antioxidative activity than that <strong>of</strong> BHT. The EO <strong>of</strong> Croton<br />
urucurana showed an activity in the DPPH assay with an IC 50 value <strong>of</strong> 3.21 mg/mL (Simionatto<br />
et al., 2007).<br />
The EO <strong>of</strong> Elionurus elegans Kunth. (African pasture grass, Poaceae) was investigated for its<br />
biological activities. GC/MS analyses showed that the oil contains a-bisabolol (1.6% in the roots <strong>and</strong><br />
1.2% in the aerial parts). None <strong>of</strong> the other compounds exhibited in individual test systems antioxidative<br />
activities with the exception <strong>of</strong> limonene <strong>and</strong>, which were available only in low amounts. The<br />
antioxidant activity <strong>of</strong> the EO was tested with the chemiluminescence method using a luminometer,<br />
where the chemiluminescence intensity <strong>of</strong> the reaction mixture containing the EO or a st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
(a-tocopherol), AAPH, <strong>and</strong> luminol was measured. The IC 50 value for the EO obtained from the<br />
aerial parts amounted to 30% <strong>and</strong> the 50% inhibition rate <strong>of</strong> the roots EO to 46%.<br />
Teucrium marum (mint plant, Lamiaceae) is used in the traditional medicine for its antibacterial,<br />
anti-inflammatory, <strong>and</strong> antipyretic activities. The antioxidative activity <strong>of</strong> the EO, which contains<br />
about 15% b-bisabolene, was investigated in three different test systems. The inhibition <strong>of</strong> lipid<br />
peroxide formation <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> superoxide radicals <strong>and</strong> the radical scavenging activity with DPPH were<br />
tested. The oil exhibited a scavenging power in the DPPH assay (IC 50 value 13.13 mg/mL), which is<br />
similar to the well-known antioxidants BHT, ascorbic acid, <strong>and</strong> trolox. Using the xanthine–xanthine<br />
assay, in which the inhibition <strong>of</strong> superoxide radicals is tested, the EO showed a better scavenging<br />
activity for the superoxide radicals than BHT (IC 50 value 0.161 mg/mL against 2.35 g/mL); however,<br />
the efficiency <strong>of</strong> ascorbic acid <strong>and</strong> trolox was higher with IC 50 values <strong>of</strong> 0.007 <strong>and</strong> 0.006 mg/mL,<br />
respectively. The inhibition <strong>of</strong> lipid peroxidation was determined with the 5-lipidoxygenase<br />
test, where the formation <strong>of</strong> the hydroxy peroxides was measured spectrophotometrically at 235 nm.<br />
The activities <strong>of</strong> the EO <strong>and</strong> trolox were similar with IC 50 values <strong>of</strong> 12.48 <strong>and</strong> 11.88 mg/mL, respectively.<br />
The inhibition power was better than ascorbic acid with an IC 50 value <strong>of</strong> 18.63 mg/mL.<br />
The antioxidative activity <strong>of</strong> BHT was higher than the activity <strong>of</strong> the EO with an IC 50 value <strong>of</strong><br />
3.86 mg/mL (Ricci et al., 2005).<br />
In the course <strong>of</strong> the investigation <strong>of</strong> the antioxidative activity <strong>of</strong> EOs obtained from three<br />
different citrus species (Rutaceae), b-bisabolene was also determined for its antioxidative property.<br />
The LDL oxidation was measured spectrophotometrically at 234 nm by the formation <strong>of</strong><br />
TBARS. The results were expressed as nmol malonic dialdehyde/mg <strong>of</strong> protein. In the test system,<br />
b-bisabolene inhibited only TBARS formation from the AAPH-induced oxidation <strong>of</strong> LDL<br />
(Takahashi et al., 2003).<br />
Several naturally occurring EOs containing for example carvacrol, anethole, perillaldehyde, cinnamaldehyde,<br />
linalool, <strong>and</strong> p-cymene were investigated for their effectiveness in their antioxidant<br />
activities <strong>and</strong> simultaneously also as to their ability in reducing a decay in fruit tissues. The tested<br />
EOs show positive effects on enhancing anthocyanins <strong>and</strong> antioxidative activity <strong>of</strong> fruits (Wang,<br />
C.Y. et al., 2008). In another study, the EO from black currant buds (Ribes nigrum L., Grossulariaceae)<br />
was analyzed by GC-MS <strong>and</strong> GC/-O <strong>and</strong> was tested for its radical scavenging activity, which—<strong>and</strong><br />
this was the outcome <strong>of</strong> the present study—varied within a broad range, for example, from 43%<br />
to 79% in the DPPH reaction system (Dvaranauskaite et al., 2008). The antioxidant <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial<br />
properties <strong>of</strong> the rhizome EO <strong>of</strong> four different Hedychium species (Zingiberaceae) were investigated<br />
by Joshi et al. (2008). The rhizome EOs from all Hedychium species tested exhibited<br />
moderate to good Fe 2+ chelating activity, whereas especially Hedychium spicatum also showed a<br />
complete different DPPH radical scavenging pr<strong>of</strong>ile than the samples from the other species. Finally,<br />
a very strong superoxide anion scavenging <strong>and</strong> an excellent DPPH-scavenging activity besides a<br />
strong hypolipidemic property possessed a methanol fractionate <strong>of</strong> the mountain celery seed EO<br />
(Cryptotaenia japonica Hassk, Apiaceae). The principal constituents <strong>of</strong> this fraction after a successive<br />
gel column adsorption were g-selinene, 2-methylpropanal, <strong>and</strong> (Z)-9-octadecenamide (Cheng<br />
et al., 2008).
Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 273<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Abdel-Fattah, A.-F.M., K. Matsumoto, <strong>and</strong> H. Watanabe, 2000. Antinociceptive effects <strong>of</strong> Nigella sativa oil <strong>and</strong><br />
its major component, thymoquinone, in mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol., 400(1): 89–97.<br />
Abdollahi, M., H. Karimpour, <strong>and</strong> R. Monsef-Esfehani, 2003. Antinociceptive effects <strong>of</strong> Teucrium polium L.<br />
total extract <strong>and</strong> essential oil in mouse writhing test. Pharmacol. Res., 48(1): 31–35.<br />
Abdon, A.P., J.H. Leal-Cardoso, A.N. Coelho-de-Souza, S.M. Morais, <strong>and</strong> C.F. Santos, 2002. Antinociceptive<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Croton nepetaefolius on mice. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res., 35(10):<br />
1215–1219.<br />
Abdullah, D., Q. Ping, <strong>and</strong> G. Liu, 1999. Studies on the interaction between eucalyptus oil <strong>and</strong> liquid crystals<br />
<strong>of</strong> skin lipids. J. Chin. Pharm. Sci., 8(3): 135–141.<br />
Adorjan, M. 2007. Studien über die Wirksamkeit von Ätherischen Ölen. Master Thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna.<br />
Ali, B.H. <strong>and</strong> G. Blunden, 2003. Pharmacological <strong>and</strong> toxicological properties <strong>of</strong> Nigella sativa. Phytother.<br />
Res., 17(4): 299–305.<br />
Alitonou, G.A., F. Avlessi, D.K. Sohounhloue, H. Agnaniet, <strong>and</strong> J.-M. Bessiere, C. Menut, 2006. Investigations<br />
on the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Cymbopogon giganteus from Benin for its potential use as an anti-inflammatory<br />
agent. Int. J. Aromather., 16(1): 37–41.<br />
Allahverdiyev, A., N. Duran, S. Cetiner, <strong>and</strong> M. Ozguven, 2001. Investigation <strong>of</strong> the anticancerogenic effect <strong>of</strong><br />
the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Melissa <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L. Pharm. Pharmacol. Lett., 11(1): 26–29.<br />
Allahverdiyev, A., N. Duran, M. Ozguven, <strong>and</strong> S. Koltas, 2004. Antiviral activity <strong>of</strong> the volatile oils <strong>of</strong> Melissa<br />
<strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L. Against Herpes simplex virus type-2. Phytomedicine, 11(7–8): 657–661.<br />
Alma, M.H., A. Mavi, A. Yildrim, M. Digrak, <strong>and</strong> T. Hirata, 2003. Screening chemical composition <strong>and</strong> in vitro<br />
antioxidant <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial activities <strong>of</strong> the essential oils from Origanum syriacum L. growing in<br />
Turkey. Biol. Pharm. Bull., 26(12): 1725–1729.<br />
Ao, Y., K. Satoh, K. Shibano, Y. Kawahito, <strong>and</strong> S. Shioda, 2008. Singlet oxygen scavenging activity <strong>and</strong> cytotoxicity<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils from rutaceae. J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr., 43(1): 6–12.<br />
Asekun, O.T. <strong>and</strong> B.A. Adeniyi, 2004. Antimicrobial <strong>and</strong> cytotoxic activities <strong>of</strong> the fruit essential oil <strong>of</strong> Xylopia<br />
aethiopica from Nigeria. Fitoterapia, 75: 368–370.<br />
Badary, O.A. <strong>and</strong> A.M.G. El-Din, 2000. Antitumor activity <strong>of</strong> thymochinone against fibrosarcoma tumorgenesis.<br />
Cancer Mol. Biol., 7(3): 1515–1526.<br />
Barocelli, E., F. Calcina, M. Chiavarini, et al., 2004. Antinociceptive <strong>and</strong> gastroprotective effects <strong>of</strong> inhaled <strong>and</strong><br />
orally administered Lav<strong>and</strong>ula hybrida Reverchon “Grosso” essential oil. Life Sci., 76(2): 213–223.<br />
Bastos-Markowizc, D.H., E.Y. Ishimoto, M. Ortiz, M. Marques, A. Fern<strong>and</strong>o Ferri, <strong>and</strong> A.F.S. Torres, 2006.<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oil <strong>and</strong> antioxidant activity <strong>of</strong> green mate <strong>and</strong> mate tee (Illex paraguariensis) infusions. J. Food<br />
Comp. Anal., 19(6–7): 538–543.<br />
Batista, P.A., M.F. Werner, E.C. Oliveira, et al., 2008. Evidence for the involvement <strong>of</strong> ionotropic glutamergic<br />
receptors on the antinociceptive effect <strong>of</strong> (−)-linalool in mice. Neurosci. Lett., 440(3): 299–303.<br />
Benencia, F. <strong>and</strong> M.C. Courrèges, 1999. Antiviral activity <strong>of</strong> s<strong>and</strong>alwood oil against Herpes simplex viruses-1<br />
<strong>and</strong> -2. Phytomedicine, 6(2): 119–123.<br />
Bighetti, E.J.B., C.A. Hiruma-Lima, J.S. Gracioso, <strong>and</strong> A.R.M.S. Brito, 1999. Anti-inflammatory <strong>and</strong> antinociceptive<br />
effects in rodents <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Croton cajucara Benth. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 51(12):<br />
1447–1453.<br />
Botsoglou, N.A., A. Govaris, E.N. Botsoglou, S.H. Grigoropoulou, <strong>and</strong> G. Papageorgiou, 2003. Antioxidant<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> dietary Oregano essential oil <strong>and</strong> a-Tocopheryl acetate supplementation in long term frozen<br />
stored Turkey meat. J. Agric. Food Chem., 51: 2930–2936.<br />
Buchbauer G., 2002. Lavender oil <strong>and</strong> its therapeutic properties. In Lavender. The Genus Lav<strong>and</strong>ula, M. Lis-<br />
Balchin (ed.), pp. 124–139. London: Taylor & Francis.<br />
Buchbauer G., 2004. Über biologische Wirkungen von Duftst<strong>of</strong>fen und Ätherischen Ölen. Wr. Medizin.<br />
Wochenschr., 154: 539–547.<br />
Buchbauer G., 2007. Aromatherapie un Naturwissenschaft—ein Widerspruch? Komplementäre Integrative<br />
Medizin, 48(11): 14–19.<br />
Burits, M. <strong>and</strong> F. Bucar, 2000. Antioxidant activity <strong>of</strong> Nigella sativa essential oil, Phytother. Res., 14: 323–328.<br />
Burits, M., K. Asres, <strong>and</strong> F. Bucar, 2001. The antioxidant activity <strong>of</strong> the essential oils <strong>of</strong> Artemisia afra,<br />
Artemisia abyssinica <strong>and</strong> Juniperus procera. Phytother. Res., 15: 103–108.<br />
Cal, K., 2005. How does the type <strong>of</strong> vehicle influence the in vitro skin absorption <strong>and</strong> elimination kinetics <strong>of</strong><br />
terpenes? Arch. Dermatol. Res., 297: 311–315.<br />
Cal, K. <strong>and</strong> M. Krzyzaniak, 2006. Stratum corneum absorption <strong>and</strong> retention <strong>of</strong> linalool <strong>and</strong> terpinen-4-ol<br />
applied as gel or oily solution in humans. J. Dermatol. Sci., 42(3): 265–267.
274 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Cal, K. <strong>and</strong> M. Sznitowska, 2003. Cutaneous absorption <strong>and</strong> elimination <strong>of</strong> three acyclic terpenes in vitro studies.<br />
J. Controlled Release, 93: 369–376.<br />
Calcabrini, A., A. Stringaro, L. Toccacieli, et al., 2004. Terpinen-4-ol, the main component <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca alternifolia<br />
(tea tree) oil inhibits in vitro growth <strong>of</strong> human melanoma cells. J. Invest. Dermatol., 122(2): 349–360.<br />
C<strong>and</strong>an, F., M. Unlu, B. Tepe, et al., 2003. Antioxidant <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>and</strong> methanol<br />
extracts <strong>of</strong> Achillea millefolium subsp. millefolium Afan (Asteraceae). J. Ethnopharmacol., 87: 215–220.<br />
Ceschel, G.C., P. Maffei, M.D. Moretti, S. Demontis, <strong>and</strong> A.T. Peana, 2000. In vitro permeation through porcine<br />
buccal mucosa <strong>of</strong> Salvia desoleana Atzei&Picci essential oil from topical formulations. Int. J.<br />
Pharmaceut., 195: 171–177.<br />
Cha, J.-D., M.-R. Jeong, <strong>and</strong> Y.-E. Lee, 2005. Induction <strong>of</strong> apoptosis in human oral epidermoid carcinoma cells<br />
by essential oil <strong>of</strong> Chrysanthemum boreale Makino. Food Sci. Biotechnol., 14(3): 350–354.<br />
Chao, L.K., K.-F. Hua, H.-Y. Hsu, S.-S. Cheng, J.Y. Liu, <strong>and</strong> S.-T. Chang, 2005. Study on the antiinflammatory<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> essential oil from leaves <strong>of</strong> Cinnamomum osmophloeum. J. Agric. Food Chem., 53(18):<br />
7274–7278.<br />
Cheng, M.C., L.Y. Lin, T.H. Yu, <strong>and</strong> R.Y. Peng, 2008. Hypolipidemic <strong>and</strong> antioxidant activity <strong>of</strong> mountain<br />
celery (Cryptotaenia japonica Hassk) seed essential oil. J. Agric. Food Chem., 456(11): 3997–4003.<br />
Chizzola, R., H. Michitsch, <strong>and</strong> Ch. Franz, 2008. Antioxidative properties <strong>of</strong> Thymus vulgaris leaves: Comparison<br />
<strong>of</strong> different extracts <strong>and</strong> essential oil chemotypes. J. Agric. Food Chem., 56(16): 6897–6904.<br />
Choi, H.-S., H.-S. Song, H. Ukeda, <strong>and</strong> M. Sawamura, 2000. Radical-scavenging activities <strong>of</strong> citrus essential<br />
oils <strong>and</strong> their components: Detection using 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydracyl. J. Agric. Food Chem., 48:<br />
4156–4161.<br />
Conforti, F., G. Statti, D. Uzunov, <strong>and</strong> F. Menichini, 2006. Comparative chemical composition <strong>and</strong> antioxidant<br />
activities <strong>of</strong> wild <strong>and</strong> cultivated Laurus nobilis L. leaves <strong>and</strong> Foeniculum vulgare subsp. Piperitum<br />
(Ucria) coutinho seeds. Biol. Pharm. Bull., 29(10): 2056–2064.<br />
Crowell, P.L., 1999. Prevention <strong>and</strong> therapy <strong>of</strong> cancer by dietary monoterpenes. J. Nutr.,129: 775–778.<br />
Das, M.K., A. Bhattacharya, <strong>and</strong> S.K. Ghosal, 2006. Effect <strong>of</strong> different terpene-containing essential oils on<br />
percutaneous absorption <strong>of</strong> trazodone hydrochloride through mouse epidermis. Drug Delivery, 13(6):<br />
425–431.<br />
De Araujo, P.F., A.N. Coelho-de-Souza, S.M. Morais, S.C. Ferreira, <strong>and</strong> J.H. Leal-Cardhoso, 2005. Antinociceptive<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Alpinia zerumbet on mice. Phytomedicine, 12(6–7): 482–486.<br />
De Logu, A., G. Loy, M.L. Pellerano, L. Bonsignore, <strong>and</strong> M.L. Schivo, 2000. Inactivation <strong>of</strong> HSV-1 <strong>and</strong> HSV-2<br />
<strong>and</strong> prevention <strong>of</strong> cell-to-cell virus spread by Santolina insularis essential oil. Antiviral Res., 48(3):<br />
177–185.<br />
De Sousa, A.C., D.S. Alviano, A.F. Blank, P.B. Alves, C.S. Alviano, <strong>and</strong> C.R. Gattass, 2004. Melissa <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis<br />
L. essential oil: Antitumoral <strong>and</strong> antioxidant activities. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 56(5): 677–681.<br />
Dordević, V.B., T. Cvetkovic, M. Deljanin-Ilic, et al., 2006. The interaction between oxidative stress <strong>and</strong> biomarkers<br />
<strong>of</strong> inflammation in atherosclerosis. Jugos. Medicinska Biohemija, 25(4): 335–341.<br />
Dordevic, S., S. Petrovic, S. Dobric, et al., 2007. Antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anti-ulcer <strong>and</strong> antioxidant<br />
activities <strong>of</strong> Carlina acanthifolia root essential oil. J. Ethnopharmacol., 109(3): 458–463.<br />
Dorman, H.J.D. <strong>and</strong> S.G. Deans, 2004. Chemical composition, antimicrobial <strong>and</strong> in vitro antioxidant properties<br />
<strong>of</strong> Monarda citriodora var. citriodora, Myristica fragrans, Origanum vulgare ssp. Hirtum, Pelargonium sp.<br />
<strong>and</strong> Thymus zygis oils. J. Essent. Oil Res., 16: 145–150.<br />
Duschatzky, C.B., M.L. Possetto, L.B. Talarico, et al., 2005. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> chemical <strong>and</strong> antiviral properties <strong>of</strong><br />
essential oils from South American plants. Antivir. Chem. Chemother., 16(4): 247–251.<br />
Dvaranauskaite, A., P.R.Venskutonis, C. Raynaud, T. Talou, P. Viskelis, <strong>and</strong> E. Dambrauskiene, 2008.<br />
Characterization <strong>of</strong> steam volatiles in the essential oil <strong>of</strong> black currant buds <strong>and</strong> antioxidant properties <strong>of</strong><br />
different bud extracts. J. Agric. Food Chem., 56(9): 3279–3286.<br />
Eckert, G.P., T. Wegat, S. Schaffer, S. Theobald, <strong>and</strong> W.E. Müller, 2006. Oxidativer stress: Apothekenrelevante<br />
Messmethoden. Pharm. Ztg., 151(24): 20–31.<br />
El Gazzar, M., R. El Mezayen, M.R. Nicolls, J.C. Marecki, <strong>and</strong> S.C. Dreskin, 2006. Downregulation <strong>of</strong> leukotriene<br />
biosynthesis by thymochinone attenuates airway inflammation in a mouse model <strong>of</strong> allergic asthma.<br />
Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Gen. Subj., 1760(7): 1088–1095.<br />
El Mezayen, R., M. El Gazzar, M.R. Nicolls, J.C. Marecki, S.C. Dreskin, <strong>and</strong> H. Nomiyama, 2006. Effect <strong>of</strong><br />
thymochinone on cyclooxygenase expression <strong>and</strong> prostagl<strong>and</strong>in production in a mouse model <strong>of</strong> allergic<br />
airway inflammation. Immun. Lett., 106(1): 72–81.<br />
El Tantawy M.E., 2000. Chemical composition <strong>and</strong> biological activity <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Senecio mikanioides<br />
Otto. cultivated in Egypt. J. Pharm. Sci., 26: 294–306.<br />
Erdemoglu, N., N.N. Turan, I. Cakici, B. Sener, <strong>and</strong> A. Aydin, 2006. Antioxidant activities <strong>of</strong> some Lamiaceae<br />
plant extracts. Phytother. Res., 20: 9–13.
Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 275<br />
Esteves, I., I.R. Souza, M. Rodrigues, et al., 2005. Gastric antiulcer <strong>and</strong> anti-inflammatory activities <strong>of</strong> the<br />
essential oil from Casearia sylvestris Sw. J. Ethnopharmacol., 101(1–3): 191–196.<br />
Faleiro, L., G. Miguel, S. Gomes, et al., 2005. Antibacterial <strong>and</strong> antioxidant activities <strong>of</strong> essential oils isolated<br />
form Thymbra capitata L. (Cav.) <strong>and</strong> Origanum vulgare L. J. Agric. Food Chem., 53: 8162–8168.<br />
Farag, R.S., A.S. Shalaby, G.A. El-Baroty, N.A. Ibrahim, M.A. Ali, <strong>and</strong> E.M. Hassan, 2004. Chemical <strong>and</strong><br />
biological evaluation <strong>of</strong> the essential oils <strong>of</strong> different Melaleuca species. Phytother. Res., 18(1):<br />
30–35.<br />
Florou-Paneri, P., G. Palatos, A. Govaris, D. Botsoglou, I. Giannenas, <strong>and</strong> I. Ambrosiadis, 2005. Oregano herb<br />
versus Oregano essential oil as feed supplements to increase the oxidative stability <strong>of</strong> Turkey meat. Int.<br />
J. Poultry Sci., 4(11): 866–871.<br />
Gachkar, L., D. Yadegari, M. Bagher Rezaei, M. Taghizadeh, S.A. Astaneh, <strong>and</strong> I. Rasooli, 2007. Chemical <strong>and</strong><br />
biological characteristics <strong>of</strong> Cuminum cyminum <strong>and</strong> Rosmarinus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis essential oils. Food Chem.,<br />
102(3): 898–904.<br />
Ganapaty, S. <strong>and</strong> A.K. Beknal, 2004. Chemical composition <strong>and</strong> anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> Pelargonium<br />
graveolens oil (geranium). J. Nat. Prod., 20(4): 18–20.<br />
Garcia, C.C., L. Talarico, N. Almeida, S. Colombres, C. Duschatzky, <strong>and</strong> E.B. Damonte, 2003. Virucidal<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils from aromatic plants <strong>of</strong> San Luis, Argentinia. Phytother. Res., 17(9):<br />
1073–1075.<br />
Ghazanfari, G., B. Minaie, N. Yasa, et al., 2006. Biochemical <strong>and</strong> histopathological evidences for beneficial<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> Satureja Khuzestanica Jamzad essential oil on the mouse model <strong>of</strong> inflammatory bowel diseases.<br />
Toxicol. Mech. Meth., 16(7): 365–372.<br />
Golab, M. <strong>and</strong> K. Skwarlo-Sonta, 2007. Mechanism involved in the anti-inflammatory action <strong>of</strong> inhaled tea tree<br />
oil in mice. Exp. Biol. Med., 232(3): 420–426.<br />
Grassmann, J., S. Hippeli, K. Dornisch, U. Rohnert, N. Beuscher, <strong>and</strong> E.F. Elstner, 2000. Antioxidant properties<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils. Possible explanations for their anti-inflammatory effects. Arzneim.-Forsch./Drug Res.,<br />
50(1): 135–139.<br />
Grassmann, J., S. Hippeli, R. Vollmann, <strong>and</strong> E.F. Elstner, 2003. Antioxidative properities <strong>of</strong> the essential oil<br />
from Pinus mugo. J. Agric. Food Chem., 51: 7576–7582.<br />
Guerrini, A., G. Sacchetti, M. Muzzoli, et al., 2006. Composition <strong>of</strong> the volatile fraction <strong>of</strong> Ocotea b<strong>of</strong>o Kunth<br />
(Lauraceae) calyces by GC-MS <strong>and</strong> NMR fingerprinting <strong>and</strong> its antimicrobial <strong>and</strong> antioxidant activity.<br />
J. Agric. Food Chem., 54: 7778–7788.<br />
Güllüce, M., M. Sökmen, D. Daferera, et al., 2003. In vitro antibacterial antifungal <strong>and</strong> antioxidant activities <strong>of</strong><br />
the essential oil <strong>and</strong> methanol extracts <strong>of</strong> herbal parts <strong>and</strong> Callus cultures <strong>of</strong> Satureja hortensis L. J. Agric.<br />
Food Chem., 51: 3958–3965.<br />
Gutierrez, R.M., H. Luna, <strong>and</strong> S. Garrido, 2006. Antioxidant activity <strong>of</strong> Tagetes erecta essential oil. J. Chil.<br />
Chem. Soc., 51(2): 883–886.<br />
Hajhashemi, V., A. Ghannadi, <strong>and</strong> H. Jafarabadi, 2004. Black cumin seed essential oil, as a potent analgesic <strong>and</strong><br />
antiinflammatory drug. Phytother. Res., 18(3): 195–199.<br />
Hajhashemi, V., A. Ghannadi, <strong>and</strong> S.K. Pezeshkian, 2002. Antinociceptive <strong>and</strong> anti-inflammatory effects <strong>of</strong><br />
Satureja hortensis L. extracts <strong>and</strong> essential oil. J. Ethnopharmacol., 82(2–3): 83–87.<br />
Hart, P.H., C.F. Br<strong>and</strong>, T.V. Riley, R.H. Prager, <strong>and</strong> J.J. Finlay-Kones, 2000. Terpinen-4-ol, the main component<br />
<strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree oil), suppresses inflammatory mediator production<br />
by activated human monocytes. Infl amm. Res., 49(11): 619–626.<br />
Hazzit, M., A. Baaliouamer, M. Leonor Faleiro, <strong>and</strong> M. Graça Miguel, 2006. Composition <strong>of</strong> the essential oils<br />
<strong>of</strong> Thymus <strong>and</strong> Origanum species from Algeria <strong>and</strong> their antioxidant <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial activities. J. Agric.<br />
Food Chem., 54: 6314–6321.<br />
Huang, G.D., Y.H. Hunag, M.Z. Xiao, D.F. Huang, J. Liu, <strong>and</strong> J.B. Li, 2008. Effect <strong>of</strong> volatile oil <strong>of</strong> amomum<br />
on expressions <strong>of</strong> platelet activating factor <strong>and</strong> mastocarcinoma related peptide in the gastric membrane<br />
<strong>of</strong> chronic gastritis patients with helicobacter-pylori infection. Chin. J. Integr. Med., 14(1): 23–27.<br />
Hunnius., 2007. In Pharmazeutisches Wörterbuch, H.P.T. Ammon (ed.), 9th ed. Berlin-New York: W. de Gruyter<br />
Verlag.<br />
Hyun-Jin, K., C. Feng, W. Changqing, W. Xi, C. Hau Yin, <strong>and</strong> J. Zhengyu, 2004. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> antioxidant<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> Australian tee tree (Melaleuca alternifolia), Oil <strong>and</strong> its components. J. Agric. Food Chem., 52:<br />
2849–2854.<br />
Ipek, E., B.A. Tüylü, <strong>and</strong> H. Zeytinoglu, 2003. Effects <strong>of</strong> carvacrol on sister chromatid exchanges in human<br />
lymphocyte cultures. Cytotechnology, 43(1–3): 145–148.<br />
Iscan, G., N. Kirimer, M. Kürkcüoglu et al., 2006. Biological activity <strong>and</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> the essential oils <strong>of</strong><br />
Achillea schischkinii Sosn. <strong>and</strong> Achillea aleppica DC. subsp. aleppica. J. Agric. Food Chem., 54(1):<br />
170–173.
276 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Jaffary, F., A. Ghannadi, <strong>and</strong> A. Siahpoush, 2004. Antinociceptive effects <strong>of</strong> hydro-alcoholic extract <strong>and</strong> essential<br />
oil <strong>of</strong> Pataria multifl ora. Fitoterapia, 75(2): 217–220.<br />
Jahangir, T. <strong>and</strong> S. Sultana, 2007. Perillyl alcohol protects against Fe-NTA-induced nephrotoxicity <strong>and</strong> early<br />
Tu, or promotional events in rat experimental model. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., 4(4):<br />
439–445.<br />
Jain, R., M. Aqil, A. Ahad, A. Ali, <strong>and</strong> R.K. Khar, 2008. Basil oil is a promising skin penetration enhancer for<br />
transdermal delivery <strong>of</strong> labetolol hydrochloride. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 34(4): 384–389.<br />
Jirovetz, L., G. Buchbauer, I. Stoilova, A. Stoyanova, A. Krastnov, <strong>and</strong> E. Schmidt, 2006. Chemical composition<br />
<strong>and</strong> antioxidant properties <strong>of</strong> clove leave essential oil. J. Agric. Food Chem., 54: 6303–6307.<br />
Joshi, S., C.S. Chanotiva, G. Agarwal, O. Prakash, A.K. Pant, <strong>and</strong> C.S. Mathela, 2008. Terpenoid compositions,<br />
<strong>and</strong> antioxidant <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial properties <strong>of</strong> the rhizome essential oils <strong>of</strong> different Hedychium species.<br />
Chem. Biodivers., 5(2): 299–309.<br />
Kamatou, G.P.P., R.L. Van Zyl, S.F. Van Vuuren, et al., 2006. Chemical composition, leaf trichome types <strong>and</strong><br />
biological activities <strong>of</strong> the essential oils <strong>of</strong> four related Salvia species indigenous to Southern Africa.<br />
J. Essent. Oil Res., 18(Spec. ed.): 72–79.<br />
Kamatou, G.P.P., A.M.Viljoen, A.B. Gono-Bwalya, et al., 2005. The in vitro pharmacological activities <strong>and</strong> a<br />
chemical investigation <strong>of</strong> free South African Salvia species. J. Ethnopharmacol., 102: 382–390.<br />
Karabay-Yavasoglu, N.U., S. Baykan, B. Ozturk, S. Apaydin, <strong>and</strong> I. Tuglular, 2006. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the antinociceptive<br />
<strong>and</strong> anti-inflammatory activities <strong>of</strong> Satureja thymbra L. essential oil. Pharm. Biol., 44(8): 585–591.<br />
Karioti, A., D. Hadjipavlou-Litina, M.L.K. Mensah, T.C. Fleischer, <strong>and</strong> H. Skaltsa, 2004. Composition <strong>and</strong><br />
antioxidant activity <strong>of</strong> the essential oils <strong>of</strong> Xylopia aethiopica (Dun) A. Rich. (Annonaceae) leaves, stem<br />
bark, root bark <strong>and</strong> fresh <strong>and</strong> dried fruits growing in Ghana. J. Agric. Food Chem., 52: 8094–8098.<br />
Kilani, S., J. Ledauphin, I. Bouhlel, et al., 2008. Comparative study <strong>of</strong> Cyperus rotundus essential oil by a<br />
modified GC/MS analysis method. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> its antioxidant, cytotoxic, <strong>and</strong> apoptotic effects. Chem.<br />
Biodivers., 5(5): 729–742.<br />
Kim, R.-G., K.-M. Shin, S.-K. Chun, et al., 2002. In vitro antiinflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> the essential oil from<br />
Ligularia fi scheri var. Spiciformis in murine macrophage Raw 264.7 cells. Yakhak Hoechi, 46(5):<br />
343–347.<br />
Komuru, T.R., M.A. Khan, <strong>and</strong> I.K. Reddy, 1999. Effect <strong>of</strong> chiral enhancers on the permeability <strong>of</strong> optically<br />
active <strong>and</strong> racemic metoprolol across hairless mouse skin. Chiraliy, 11: 536–540.<br />
Kordali, S., A. Cakir, A. Mavi, H. Kilic, <strong>and</strong> A. Yildirim, 2005. Screening <strong>of</strong> chemical composition <strong>and</strong> antifungal<br />
<strong>and</strong> antioxidant activities <strong>of</strong> the essential oils from three Turkisch Artemisia species. J. Agric. Food<br />
Chem., 53: 1408–1416.<br />
Kordali, S., R. Kotan, A. Mavi, A. Cakir, A. Ala, <strong>and</strong> A. Yildirim, 2005. Determination <strong>of</strong> the chemical composition<br />
<strong>and</strong> antioxidant activity <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Artemisia dracunculus amd <strong>of</strong> the antifungal <strong>and</strong><br />
untibacterial activities <strong>of</strong> Turkish Artemisia absinthium, A. dracunculus, Artemisia santonicum, <strong>and</strong><br />
Artemisia spicigera essential oils. J. Agric. Food Chem., 53: 9452–9458.<br />
Kunta, J.R., V.R. Goskonda, H.O. Brotherton, M.A. Khan, <strong>and</strong> I.K. Reddy, 1997. Effect <strong>of</strong> menthol <strong>and</strong> related<br />
terpenes on the percutaneous absorption <strong>of</strong> propanolol across excised hairless mouse skin. J. Pharm. Sci.,<br />
86: 1369–1373.<br />
Lantry, L.E., Z. Zhang, F. Gao, et al., 1997. Chemopreventive effect <strong>of</strong> perillyl alcohol on 4-(methylnitrosamino)-<br />
1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone induced tumorigenesis (C3H/HeJ X A/J)F1 mouse lung. J. Cell. Biochem.,<br />
27(Suppl.): 20–25.<br />
Lee, K.-T., R.-K. Kim, S.-Y. Ji, et al., 2003. In vitro anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> the essential oil extracted<br />
from Chryanthemum sibiricum in murine macrophage RAQ 264.7 cells. Nat. Prod. Sci., 9(2): 93–96.<br />
Lee, S.-J., K. Umano, T. Shibamoto, <strong>and</strong> K.G. Lee, 2005. Identification <strong>of</strong> volatile components in basil<br />
(Ocimum basilicum L.) <strong>and</strong> thyme leaves (Thymus vulgaris L.) <strong>and</strong> their antioxidant properties. Food<br />
Chem., 91: 131–137.<br />
Legault, J., W. Dahl, E. Debiton, A. Pichette, <strong>and</strong> J.-C. Madelmont, 2003. Antitumor activity <strong>of</strong> baslam fir oil:<br />
Production <strong>of</strong> reactive oxygen species induced by a-humulene as possible mechanism <strong>of</strong> action. Planta<br />
Med., 69(5): 402–407.<br />
Li, Z., H. Wang, X. Shi, M. Chen, <strong>and</strong> Q. Ying, 2001. Effect <strong>of</strong> eucalyptus oil on percutaneous penetration <strong>and</strong><br />
absorption <strong>of</strong> clobetasol propionate cream. Zhongguo Yiyuan Yaoxue Zazhi, 21(2): 67–69.<br />
Lino, C.S., P.B. Gomes, D.L. Lucetti, et al., 2005. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> antinociceptive <strong>and</strong> antiinflammatory activities<br />
<strong>of</strong> the essential oil (EO) <strong>of</strong> Ocimum micranthum Wild. from Northeastern Brazil. Phytother. Res., 19(8):<br />
708–712.<br />
Löffler, G. <strong>and</strong> P. Petrides, 1998. Biochemie und Pathobiochemie, 6th ed. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer<br />
Verlag.
Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 277<br />
Löw-Baselli, A., W.W. Huber, M. Käfer, K. Bukowska, R. Schulte-Herrmann, <strong>and</strong> B. Grasl-Kraupp, 2000.<br />
Failure to demonstrate chemoprevention by the monoterpene oerillyl alcohol during early rat heptocarcinogenesis:<br />
A cautionary note. Carcinogenesis, 21: 1869–1877.<br />
Loizzo, M.R., A. Saab, R. Tundis, et al., 2008a. Phytochemical analysis <strong>and</strong> in vitro evaluation <strong>of</strong> the biological<br />
activity against Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) <strong>of</strong> Cedrus libani A. Rich. Phytomedicine, 15(1–2):<br />
79–83.<br />
Loizzo, M.R., A.M. Saab, R. Tundis, et al., 2008b. Phytochemical analysis <strong>and</strong> in vitro antiviral activities <strong>of</strong> the<br />
essential oils <strong>of</strong> seven Lebanon species. Chem. Biodivers., 5: 461–472.<br />
Lopes-Lutz, D., D.S. Alviano, C.S. Alviano, <strong>and</strong> P.P. Kolodziejczyk, 2008. Screening <strong>of</strong> chemical composition,<br />
antimicrobial <strong>and</strong> antioxidant activities <strong>of</strong> Artemisia essential oils. Phytochemistry, 69(8): 1732–1738.<br />
Lourens, A.C.U., D. Reddy, K.H.C. Baser, A. M.Viljoen, <strong>and</strong> S.F. Van Vuuren, 2004. In vitro biological activity<br />
<strong>and</strong> essential oil composition <strong>of</strong> four indigenous South African Helichrysum species. J. Ethnopharmacol.,<br />
95(2–3): 253–258.<br />
Magwa M.L., M. Gundidza, N. Gweru, <strong>and</strong> G. Humphrey, 2006. Chemical composition <strong>and</strong> biological activities<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oil from the leaves <strong>of</strong> Sesuvium portu lacastrum. J. Ethnopharmacol., 103: 85–89<br />
Manosroi, J., P. Dhumtanom, <strong>and</strong> A. Manosroi, 2006. Anti-proliferative activity <strong>of</strong> essential oil extracts from<br />
Thai medicinal plants on KB <strong>and</strong> P388 cell lines. Cancer Lett., 235(1): 114–120.<br />
Marongiu, B., S. Porcedda, A. Piras, A. Rosa, M. Deiana, <strong>and</strong> M.A. Dessì, 2004. Antioxidant activity <strong>of</strong> supercritical<br />
extract <strong>of</strong> Melissa <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis susp. Offi cinalis <strong>and</strong> Melissa <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis susp. Inodora. Phytother.<br />
Res., 18: 789–792.<br />
Masotti, V., F. Juteau, J.M. Bessiére, <strong>and</strong> J. Viano, 2003. Seasonal <strong>and</strong> phenological variations <strong>of</strong> the essential<br />
oil from the narrow endemic species Artemisia moliniri <strong>and</strong> its biological activities. J. Agric. Food Chem.,<br />
51: 7115–7121.<br />
Miguel, M.G., A.C. Figueiredo, M.M. Costa, et al., 2003. Effect <strong>of</strong> the volatile constituents isolated from Tymus<br />
albicans, Th. Mastichina, Th. carnosus <strong>and</strong> Thymbra capitata in sunflower oil. Nahrung/Food, 47(6):<br />
397–402.<br />
Mills, J.J., R.S. Chari, I.J. Boyer, M.N. Gould, <strong>and</strong> R.L. Jirtle, 1995. Induction <strong>of</strong> apoptosis in liver tumors by<br />
the monoterpene perillyl alcohol. Cancer Res., 55: 979–983.<br />
Mimica-Dukic, N., B. Bozin, S. Marina, <strong>and</strong> N. Simin, 2004. Antimicrobial <strong>and</strong> antioxidant activities <strong>of</strong> Melissa<br />
<strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L. (Lamiaceae) essential oil. J. Agric. Food Chem., 52: 2485–2489.<br />
Mimica-Dukic, N., B. Bozin, M. Sokovic, B. Mihajlovic, <strong>and</strong> M. Matavulj, 2003. Antimicrobial <strong>and</strong> antioxidant<br />
activities <strong>of</strong> three Mentha species essential oils. Planta Med., 69: 413–419.<br />
Minami, M., M. Kita, T. Nakaya, T. Yamamoto, H. Kuriyama, <strong>and</strong> J. Imanishi, 2003. The inhibitory effect <strong>of</strong><br />
essential oils on Herpes simplex virus type-1 replication in vitro. Microbiol. Immunol., 47(9): 681–684.<br />
Mittal, A., U.V. Sara, A. Ali, <strong>and</strong> M. Aqil, 2008. The effect <strong>of</strong> penetration enhancers on permeation kinetics <strong>of</strong><br />
nitrendipine in two different skin models. Biol. Pharm. Bull., 31(9): 1766–1762.<br />
Monteiro, M.V.B., A.K.R.M. de Leite, L.M. Bertini, S. Maia de Morais, <strong>and</strong> D.C.S. Nunes-Pinheiro, 2007.<br />
Topical anti-inflammatory, gastroprotective <strong>and</strong> antioxidant effects <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Lippia sidoides<br />
Cham. leaves. J. Ethnopharmacol., 111(2): 378–382.<br />
Monti, D, P. Chetoni, S. Burgalassi, M. Najarro, M.F. Saettone, <strong>and</strong> E. Boldrini, 2002. Effect <strong>of</strong> different terpene-containing<br />
essential oils on permeation <strong>of</strong> estradiol through hairless mouse skin. Int. J. Pharm.,<br />
237(1–2): 209–214.<br />
Nyiligira, E., A.M. Viljoen, K.H.C. Baser, T. Ozek, <strong>and</strong> S.F. Van Vuuren, 2004. <strong>Essential</strong> oil composition <strong>and</strong><br />
in vitro antimicrobial <strong>and</strong> anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> South African Vitex species. S. Afr. J. Botan.,<br />
70(4): 611–617.<br />
Ozturk, A. <strong>and</strong> H. Ozbek, 2005. The anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> Eugenia caryophyllata essential oil: An<br />
animal model <strong>of</strong> anti-inflammatory activity. Eur. J. Gen. Med., 2(4): 159–163.<br />
Papageorgiou, V., C. Gardelli, A. Mallouchos, M. Papaioannou, <strong>and</strong> M. Komaitis, 2008. Variation <strong>of</strong> the chemical<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>and</strong> antioxidant behavior <strong>of</strong> Rosmarinus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L. <strong>and</strong> Salvia fruticosa Miller grown in<br />
Greece. J. Agric. Food Chem., 56(16): 7254–7264.<br />
Park, H.J. <strong>and</strong> M.Y. Choi, 2005. In vitro antiinflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> paeonol from the essential oil <strong>and</strong> its<br />
derivate methylpaeonol. Saengyak Hakhoechi, 36(2): 116–120.<br />
Passos, G.F., E.S. Fern<strong>and</strong>es, F.M. Da Cunha, et al., 2007. Anti-inflammatory <strong>and</strong> anti-allergic properties <strong>of</strong> the<br />
essential oil <strong>and</strong> active compounds from Cordia verbenaceae. J. Ethnopharmacol., 110(2): 323–333.<br />
Peana, A.T., P.S. D´Aquila, M. Chessa, et al., 2003. (−)-Linalool produces anti-nociception in two experimental<br />
models <strong>of</strong> pain. Eur. J. Pharmacol., 460(1): 37–41.<br />
Peana, A.T., P.S. D´Aquila, F. Panin, G. Serra, P. Pippia, <strong>and</strong> M.D.L. Moretti, 2002. Anti-inflammatory activity<br />
<strong>of</strong> linalool <strong>and</strong> linalyl acetate constituents <strong>of</strong> essential oils. Phytomedicine, 9(8): 721–726.
278 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Peana, A.T., S. Marzocco, A. Popolo, <strong>and</strong> A. Pinto, 2006b. (−)-Linalool inhibits in vitro NO formation: Probable<br />
involvement in the antinociceptive activity <strong>of</strong> this Monoterpene compound. Life Sci., 78(7): 719–723.<br />
Peana, A.T., P. Rubatto, G.G. Piga, et al., 2006a. Involvement <strong>of</strong> adenosine A1 <strong>and</strong> A2 receptors in (−)-linaloolinduced<br />
antinociception. Life Sci., 78(21): 2471–2474.<br />
Pearson, D.A., E.N. Frankel, R. Aeschenbach, <strong>and</strong> J.B. German, 1997. Inhibition <strong>of</strong> endothelial cell-mediated oxidation<br />
<strong>of</strong> low-density lipoprotein by Rosemary <strong>and</strong> plant phenolics. J. Agric. Food Chem., 45: 578–582.<br />
Pharmacon (05.03.2007) Available at http://www.pharmacon.net/schmerzmedizin/f.htm<br />
Phillips, L.R., L. Malspeis, <strong>and</strong> J.G. Supko, 1995. Pharmacokinetics <strong>of</strong> active drug metabolites after oral<br />
administration <strong>of</strong> perillyl alcohol, an investigational antineoplastic agent, to the dog. Drug Metab.<br />
Dispos., 23: 676–680.<br />
Phutdhawong, W., A. Donchai, J. Korth, et al., 2004. The components <strong>and</strong> anti-cancer activity <strong>of</strong> the volatile oil<br />
from Streblus asper. Flavour Frag. J., 19(5): 445–447.<br />
Politeo, O., M. Jukić, <strong>and</strong> M. Miloš, 2006. Chemical composition <strong>and</strong> antioxidant activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>of</strong><br />
twelve spice plants. Croat. Chem. Acta., 79(4): 545–552.<br />
Primo, V., M. Rovera, S. Zanon, et al., 2001. Determination <strong>of</strong> the antibacterial <strong>and</strong> antiviral activity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
essential oil from Minthostachys verticillata (Griseb.) Epling. Rev. Argent. Microbiol., 33(2):<br />
113–117.<br />
R<strong>and</strong>onic, A. <strong>and</strong> M. Milos, 2003. Chemical composition <strong>and</strong> antioxidant test <strong>of</strong> free <strong>and</strong> glycosidically bound<br />
volatile compounds <strong>of</strong> Savory (Satureja montana L. susp. montana) from Croatia. Nahrung/Food, 47(4):<br />
236–237.<br />
Ramos, M.F.S., A.C. Siani, M.C. Souza, E.C. Rosas, <strong>and</strong> M.G.M.O. Henriques, 2006. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the antiinflammatory<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils from five Myrtaceae species. Revista Fitos, 2(2): 58–66.<br />
Ravizza, R., M.B. Gariboldi, R. Molteni, <strong>and</strong> E. Monti, 2008. Linalool, a plant-derived monoterpene alcohol,<br />
reverses doxorubicin resistance in human breast adenocarcinoma cells. Oncol. Rep., 20(3): 625–630.<br />
Reddy, B.S., C.X. Wang, H. Samaha, et al., 1997. Chemoprevention <strong>of</strong> colon carcinogenesis by dietary perillyl<br />
alcohol. Cancer Res., 57: 420–425.<br />
Reichling, J., C. Koch, E. Stahl-Biskup, C. Sojka, <strong>and</strong> P. Schnitzler, 2005. Virucidal activity <strong>of</strong> a beta-triketonerich<br />
essential oil <strong>of</strong> Leptospermum scoparium (Manuka oil) against HSV-1 <strong>and</strong> HSV-2 in cell culture.<br />
Planta Med., 71(12): 1123–1127.<br />
Reichling, J., U. L<strong>and</strong>vatter, H. Wagner, K.H. Kostka, <strong>and</strong> U.F. Schaefer, 2006. In vitro studies on release <strong>and</strong><br />
human skin permeation <strong>of</strong> Australian tea tree oil (TTO) from tropical formulations. Eur. J. Pharm.<br />
Biopharm., 64(2): 222–228.<br />
Ricci, D., D. Fraternale, L. Giamperi, et al., 2005. Chemical composition untimicrobiol <strong>and</strong> antioxidant acitivity<br />
<strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Teucrium marum (Lamiaceae). J. Ethnopharmacol., 98: 195–200.<br />
Ruberto, G., N.M.T. Baratta, S.G. Deans, <strong>and</strong> H.J.D. Dorman, 2000. Antioxidant <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial Foeniculum<br />
vulgare <strong>and</strong> Crithmum maritimum essential oils. Planta Med., 66: 687–693.<br />
Ryabchenko, B., L. Jirovetz, G. Buchbauer, W. Jäger, <strong>and</strong> E. Schmidt, 2007. In vitro antiviral <strong>and</strong> anticancer<br />
properties <strong>of</strong> selected aroma samples. Paper presented at the Proc. 38th Int. Symp. on <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>,<br />
Graz, Austria. Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts, p. 36, September 7–12.<br />
Ryabchenko, B., E. Tupova, E. Schmidt, K. Wlcek, G. Buchbauer, <strong>and</strong> L. Jirovetz, 2008. Investigation <strong>of</strong> anticancer<br />
<strong>and</strong> antiviral properties <strong>of</strong> selected aroma samples. Nat. Prod. Commun., 3(7): 1085–1088.<br />
Sacchetti, G., A. Medici, S. Maietti, et al., 2004. Composition <strong>and</strong> functional properties <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong><br />
Amazonian Basil, Ocimum micranthum Wild., Labiatae in comparison with commercial essential oils.<br />
J. Agric. Food Chem., 52: 3486–3491.<br />
Sacchetti, G., S. Maietti, M. Muzzoli, et al., 2005. Comperative evaluation <strong>of</strong> 11 essential oils <strong>of</strong> different origin<br />
as functional antioxidants, antiradicals <strong>and</strong> antimicrobials in foods. Food Chem., 91: 621–632.<br />
Sahouo, G.B., Z.F. Tonzibo, B. Boti, C. Chopard, J.P. Mahy, <strong>and</strong> Y.T. N´guessan, 2003. Anti-inflammatory <strong>and</strong><br />
analgesic activities, chemical constituents <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>of</strong> Ocimum gratissimum, Eucalyptus citriodora,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Cymbopogon giganteus inhibites lipoxygenase L-1 <strong>and</strong> cyclooxygenase <strong>of</strong> PGHS. Bull. Chem. Soc.<br />
Ethiop., 17(2): 191–197.<br />
Salasia, S.I.O., Rochmadiyanto <strong>and</strong> O.F. Dan Wiwit Setyawati, 2002. Antiinflammatory effects <strong>of</strong> cinnamyl<br />
tiglate contained in volatile oil <strong>of</strong> kunyit (Curcuma domestica Val.). Majalah Farmasi Indonesia, 13(3):<br />
162–168.<br />
Salehi, P., A. Sonboli, F. Eftekhar, S. Nejad-Ebrahimi, <strong>and</strong> M. Yousefzadi, 2005. <strong>Essential</strong> oil composition<br />
antibacterial <strong>and</strong> antioxidant activity <strong>of</strong> the oil <strong>and</strong> various extracts <strong>of</strong> Ziziphora clinopodioides subsp.<br />
rigida (Boiss.) Rech. f. from Iran, Biol. Pharm. Bull., 28 (10): 1892–1896.<br />
Salles-Trevisan, M.T., M.G.V. Silva, B. Pfundstein, B. Spiegelhalder, <strong>and</strong> R. Wyn Oven, 2006. Characterisation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the volatile pattern <strong>and</strong> antioxidant capacity <strong>of</strong> essential oils from different species <strong>of</strong> the genus<br />
Ocimum. J. Agric. Food Chem., 54: 4378–4382.
Biological Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 279<br />
Santos, F.A. <strong>and</strong> V.S.N. Rao, 2000. Antiinflammatory <strong>and</strong> antinociceptive effects <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole, a terpenoid<br />
oxide present in many plant essential oils. Phytother. Res., 14(4): 240–244.<br />
Santos, F.A., F.A. Jeferson, C.C. Santos, E.R. Silveira, <strong>and</strong> V.S.N. Rao, 2005. Antinociceptive effect <strong>of</strong> leaf<br />
essential oil from Croton sonderianus in mice. Life Sci., 77(23): 2953–2963.<br />
Sayyah, M., G. Saroukhani, A. Peirovi, <strong>and</strong> M. Kamalinejad, 2003. Analgesic <strong>and</strong> anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong><br />
the leaf essential oil <strong>of</strong> Laurus nobilis Linn. Phytother. Res., 17(7): 733–736.<br />
Schehl, U. <strong>and</strong> R. Schroth, 2004. Freie Radikale—Freunde oder Feinde. Österr. Apoth.-Ztg., 58(6): 256–259.<br />
Scheurecker, M. 2007. Antioxidative activities <strong>of</strong> essential oils. Master Thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna.<br />
Schmidt, E., L. Jirovetz, G. Buchbauer, et al. 2006. Composition <strong>and</strong> antioxidant activities <strong>of</strong> the essential oil<br />
<strong>of</strong> cinnamon (Cinnamonum zeylanicum Blume) leaves <strong>of</strong> Sri Lanka. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants, 9(2):<br />
170–182.<br />
Schmidt, E., St. Bail, G. Buchbauer, et al., 2008. Chemical composition, olfactory evaluation <strong>and</strong> antioxidant<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Origanum majorana L. from Albania. Natural Product Communications,<br />
3(7): 1051–1056.<br />
Schnitzler, P., K. Schön, <strong>and</strong> J. Reichling, 2001. Anticiral activity <strong>of</strong> Australian tea tree oil <strong>and</strong> eucalyptus oil<br />
against Herpes simplex virus in cell culture. Pharmazie, 56(4): 343–347.<br />
Schnitzler, P., A. Schuhmacher, A. Astani, <strong>and</strong> J. Reichling, 2008. Melissa <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis oil affects infectivity <strong>of</strong><br />
enveloped herpes viruses. Phytomedicine, 15(9): 734–740.<br />
Schuhmacher, A., J. Reichling, <strong>and</strong> P. Schnitzler, 2003. Virucidal effect <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil on the enveloped<br />
viruses Herpes simplex virus type 1 <strong>and</strong> type 2 in vitro. Phytomedicine, 10(6–7): 504–510.<br />
Shen, Q., J. Hu, <strong>and</strong> L. Xu, 2001. Effect <strong>of</strong> cinnamom oil <strong>and</strong> other colatile oils on percutaneous absorption <strong>of</strong><br />
benzoic acid. Zhongguo Yiyuan Yaoxue Zazhi, 21(4): 197–199.<br />
Shen, Q., W. Li, <strong>and</strong> W. Li, 2007. The effect <strong>of</strong> clove oil on the transdermal delivery <strong>of</strong> ibupr<strong>of</strong>en in the rabbit<br />
by in vitro <strong>and</strong> in vivo methods. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 33(12): 1369–1374.<br />
Shinde, U.A., A.S. Phadke, A.M. Nair, A.A. Mungantiwar, V.J. Dikshit, <strong>and</strong> M.N. Saraf, 1999. Studies on the<br />
anti-inflammatory <strong>and</strong> analgesic activity <strong>of</strong> Cedrus deodara (Roxb.) Loud. wood oil. J. Ethnopharmacol.,<br />
65(1): 21–27.<br />
Sh<strong>of</strong>f, S.M., M. Grummer, M.B. Yatvin, <strong>and</strong> C.E. Elson, 1991. Concentration dependent increase <strong>of</strong> murine<br />
P388 <strong>and</strong> B16 population doubling time by the acyclic monoterpene geraniol. Cancer Res., 51: 37–42.<br />
Siani, A.C., M.F.S. de Ramos, O. Menezes-de-Lima, et al., 1999. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> anti-inflammatory-related activity<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils from the leaves <strong>of</strong> species <strong>of</strong> Protium. J. Ethnopharmacol., 66(1): 57–69.<br />
Silva, J., W. Abebe, S.M. Sousa, V.G. Duarte, M.I.L. Machado, <strong>and</strong> F.J.A. Matos, 2003. Analgesic <strong>and</strong> antiinflammatory<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus. J. Ethnopharmacol., 89(2–3): 277–283.<br />
Simionatto, E., V.F.L. Bonani, A.F. Morel, et al., 2007 Chemical composition <strong>and</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> antibacterial<br />
<strong>and</strong> antioxidant activities <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Croton urucurana Baillon (Euphorbiaceae) stem bark.<br />
J. Braz. Chem. Soc., 18(5): 879–885.<br />
Singh, G., M. Sumitra, C. Catalan, <strong>and</strong> M.P. De Lampasona, 2004. Chemical constituents, antifungal <strong>and</strong> antioxidative<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> ajwain essential oil <strong>and</strong> its acetone extract. J. Agric. Food Chem., 52: 3292–3296.<br />
Singh, G., P. Marimuthu, C.S. De Heluani, <strong>and</strong> C.A.N. Catalan, 2006. Antioxidant <strong>and</strong> biocidal activities <strong>of</strong> Carum<br />
nigrum (seed) essential oil oleo resin, <strong>and</strong> their selected components. J. Agric. Food Chem., 54: 174–181.<br />
Sinico, C., A. De Logu, F. Lai, et al., 2005. Liposomal incorporation <strong>of</strong> Artemisia arborescens L. essential oil<br />
<strong>and</strong> in vitro antiviral activity. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 59(1): 61–168.<br />
Sökmen, M., J. Serkedjieva, D. Daferera, et al., 2004a. In vitro antioxidant, antimicrobial, <strong>and</strong> antiviral activities<br />
<strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>and</strong> various ectracts from herbal parts <strong>and</strong> callus cultures <strong>of</strong> Origanum acutidens.<br />
J. Agric. Food Chem., 52(11): 3309–3312.<br />
Sökmen A., M. Sökmen, D. Daferera, et al., 2004b. The in vitro antioxidant <strong>and</strong> antimicrobail activities <strong>of</strong> the<br />
essential oil <strong>and</strong> methanol extracts <strong>of</strong> Achillea biebersteini Afan (Asteraceae). Phytother. Res., 18: 451–456.<br />
Song, H.S., H. Ukeda, <strong>and</strong> M. Sawamura, 2001. Antioxidative activities <strong>of</strong> citrus peel essential oils <strong>and</strong> their<br />
components against linoleic acid oxidation. Food Sci. Technol. Res., 7(1): 50–56.<br />
Souza, M.C., A.C. Siani, M.F.S. Ramos, O. Menezes-de-Lima, Jr., <strong>and</strong> M.G.M.O. Henriques, 2003. Evaluation<br />
<strong>of</strong> anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils from two Asteraceae species. Pharmazie, 58(8): 582–586.<br />
Souza, O.V., M.S. Silvério, G. Del Vechio Vieria, F.C. Matheus, C.H. Yamamoto, <strong>and</strong> M.S. Alves, 2008.<br />
Antinociceptive <strong>and</strong> anti-inflammatory effects <strong>of</strong> the essential oil from Eremanthus erythropappus leaves.<br />
J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 60(6): 771–777.<br />
Stark, M.J., Y.D. Burke, J.H. McKinzie, A.S. Ayoubi, <strong>and</strong> P.L. Crowell, 1995. Chemotherapy <strong>of</strong> pancreatic<br />
cancer with the monoterpene perillyl alcohol. Cancer Lett., 4: 15–21.<br />
Stayrock, K.R., J.H. McKinzie, Y.D. Burke, Y.A. Burke, <strong>and</strong> P.L. Crowell, 1997. Induction <strong>of</strong> the apoptosispromoting<br />
protein Bak by perillyl alcohol in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma relative to untransformed<br />
ductal epithelial cells. Carcinogenesis, 18: 1655–1658.
280 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Sylvestre, M., J. Legault, D. Dufour, <strong>and</strong> A. Pichette, 2005. Chemical composition <strong>and</strong> anticancer activity <strong>of</strong><br />
leaf essential oil <strong>of</strong> Myrica galae L. Phytomedicine, 12(4): 299–304.<br />
Sylvestre, M., A. Pichette, A. Longtin, F. Nagau, <strong>and</strong> J. Legault, 2006. <strong>Essential</strong> oil analysis <strong>and</strong> anticancer activity<br />
<strong>of</strong> leaf essential oil <strong>of</strong> Croton flavens L. from Guadeloupe. J. Ethnopharmacol., 103(1): 99–102.<br />
Takahashi, Y., N. Inaba, S. Kuwahara, <strong>and</strong> W. Kuki, 2003. Antioxidative effect <strong>of</strong> citrus essential oil components<br />
on human low-density lipoprotein in vitro. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochm., 67(1): 195–197.<br />
Tekeoglu, I., A. Dogan, <strong>and</strong> L. Demiralp, 2006. Effects <strong>of</strong> thymochinone (volatile oil <strong>of</strong> lack cumin) on rheumatoid<br />
arthritis in rat models. Phytother. Res., 20(10): 869–871.<br />
Tepe, B., D. Daferera, M. Sökmen, M. Polissiou, <strong>and</strong> A. Sökmen, 2004. In vitro antimicrobial <strong>and</strong> antioxidant<br />
activities <strong>of</strong> the essential oils <strong>and</strong> various extracts <strong>of</strong> Thymus eigii M. Zohary et P.H. Davis. J. Agric. Food<br />
Chem., 52: 1132–1137.<br />
Tuberoso, C.I.G., A. Kovalczyk, V. Coroneo, M.T. Russo, S. Dessi, <strong>and</strong> P. Cabras, 2005. Chemical composition<br />
<strong>and</strong> antioxidant, antimicrobial <strong>and</strong> antifungal activities <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Achillea ligustica all.<br />
J. Agric. Food Chem., 53: 10148–10153.<br />
Vaddi, H.K., P.C. Ho, <strong>and</strong> S.Y. Chan, 2002a. Terpenes in propylene glycol as skin penetration enhancers:<br />
Permeation <strong>and</strong> partition <strong>of</strong> haloperidol, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy <strong>and</strong> differential scanning<br />
calorimetry. J. Pharm. Sci., 91: 1639–1651.<br />
Vaddi, H.K., P.C. Ho, Y.W. Chan, <strong>and</strong> S.Y. Chan, 2002b. Terpenes in ethanol: Haloperidol permeation <strong>and</strong> partition<br />
through human skin <strong>and</strong> stratum corneum changes. J. Controlled Release, 81: 121–133.<br />
Vardar-Ünlü, G., F. C<strong>and</strong>an, A. Sökmen, et al., 2003. Antimicrobial <strong>and</strong> antioxidant activity <strong>of</strong> the essential oil<br />
<strong>and</strong> methanol extracts <strong>of</strong> Thymus pectinatus Fish. et Mey. var. pectinatus (Lamiaceae). J. Agric. Food<br />
Chem., 51: 63–67.<br />
Viana, G.S., T.G. Vale, R.S. Pinho, <strong>and</strong> F.J. Matos, 2000. Antinociceptive effect <strong>of</strong> the essential oil from<br />
Cymbopogon citratus in mice. J. Ethnopharmacol., 70(3): 323–327.<br />
Viljoen, A.M., A. Moolla, S.F. Van Vuuren, et al., 2006. The biological activity <strong>and</strong> essential oil composition <strong>of</strong><br />
17 Agathosma (Rutaceae) species. J. Essent. Oil Res., 18(Spec. ed.): 2–16.<br />
Viljoen, A.M., E.W. Njenga, S.F. Van Vuuren, C. Bicchi, P. Rubiolo, <strong>and</strong> B. Sgorbini, 2006. <strong>Essential</strong> oil composition<br />
<strong>and</strong> in vitro biological activities <strong>of</strong> seven Namibian species <strong>of</strong> Eriocephalus L. (Asteraceae).<br />
J. Essent. Oil Res., 18(Spec. ed.): 124–128.<br />
Wang, C.Y, S.Y. Wang, <strong>and</strong> C. Chen, 2008. Increasing antioxidant activity <strong>and</strong> reducing decay <strong>of</strong> blueberries<br />
by essential oils. J. Agric. Food Chem., 56(10): 3587–3592.<br />
Wang, G. <strong>and</strong> L. Zhu, 2006. Anti-inflammatory effects <strong>of</strong> ginger oil. Zhongyao Yaoli Yu Linchuang, 22(5):<br />
26–28.<br />
Wang, L.H., C.C. Wang, <strong>and</strong> S.C. Kuo, 2008. Vehicle <strong>and</strong> enhancer effects on human skin penetration <strong>of</strong> aminophylline<br />
from cream formulation: Evaluation in vivo. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci., 30(4): 310.<br />
Wattenberg, I.W., 1991. Inhibition <strong>of</strong> azoxymethane-induced neoplasia <strong>of</strong> the large bowel by 3-hydroxy-3,7,<br />
11-trimethyl-1,6,10-dodecatriene (nerolidol). Carcinogenesis, 12: 151–152.<br />
Yadegarinia, D., L. Gachkar M.B. Rezaei, M. Taghizadeh, S.A. Astaneh, <strong>and</strong> I. Rasooli, 2006. Biochemical<br />
activities <strong>of</strong> Iranian Mentha piperita L. <strong>and</strong> Myrtus communis L. essential oils. Phytochemistiy, 67:<br />
1249–1255.<br />
Yan, R, Y. Yang, Y. Zeng, <strong>and</strong> G. Zou, 2009. Cytotoxicity <strong>and</strong> antibacterial activity <strong>of</strong> Linderia strychnifolia<br />
essential oil <strong>and</strong> extracts. J. Ethnopharmacol., 121(3): 451–455.<br />
Yan, Y, X. Chen, X. Yang, et al., 2002. Inhibition by Mosla chinensis volatile oil (MCVO) on influenza virus<br />
A3. Weishengwuxue Zazhi, 22(1): 32–33.<br />
Yang, Z.-C., B.-C. Wang, X.-S. Yang, <strong>and</strong> Q. Wang, 2005. Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the volatile oil from<br />
Cynanchum stauntonii <strong>and</strong> its activities <strong>of</strong> anti-influenza virus. Biointerfaces, 43(3–4): 198–202.<br />
Yano, S., Y. Suzuki, M. Yuzurihara, et al., 2006. Antinociceptive effect <strong>of</strong> methyl-eugenol on formalin-induced<br />
hyperalgesia in mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol., 553(1–3): 99–103.<br />
Yoo, C.B., K.T. Han, K.S. Cho, et al., 2005. Eugenol isolated from the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Eugenia caryophyllata<br />
induces a reactive oxygen species-mediated apoptosis in HL-60 human promyelotic leukemia cells.<br />
Cancer Lett., 225(1): 41–52.<br />
Yu, J.Q., Z.X. Liao, X.Q. Cai, J.C. Lei, <strong>and</strong> G.L. Zou, 2007. Composition, antimicrobial activity <strong>and</strong> cytotoxicity<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils from Aristolochia mollissima. Environ. Toxcol. Pharmacol., 23(2): 162–167.<br />
Yu, S.G., L.A. Hildebr<strong>and</strong>t, <strong>and</strong> Ch. E. Elson, 1995. Geraniol, an inhibitor <strong>of</strong> mevalonate biosynthesis,<br />
suppresses the growth <strong>of</strong> hepatomas <strong>and</strong> melanomas transplanted to rats <strong>and</strong> mice. J. Nutr., 125(11):<br />
2763–2767.<br />
Zeytinoglu, H., Z. Incesu, <strong>and</strong> K.H.C. Baser, 2003. Inhibition <strong>of</strong> DNA synthesis by carvacrol in mouse myoblast<br />
cells bearing a human N-RAS oncogene. Phytomedicine, 10(4): 292–299.
10<br />
Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in the<br />
Central Nervous System<br />
CONTENTS<br />
10.1 Central Nervous System Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in Humans ....................................... 281<br />
Eva Heuberger<br />
10.1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 281<br />
10.1.2 Activation <strong>and</strong> Arousal: Definition <strong>and</strong> Neuroanatomical Considerations ....... 284<br />
10.1.3 Influence <strong>of</strong> EOs <strong>and</strong> Fragrances on Brain Potentials Indicative <strong>of</strong> Arousal .... 285<br />
10.1.3.1 Spontaneous Electroencephalogram Activity ................................... 285<br />
10.1.3.2 Contingent Negative Variation .......................................................... 289<br />
10.1.4 Effects <strong>of</strong> EOs <strong>and</strong> Fragrances on Selected Basic<br />
<strong>and</strong> Higher Cognitive Functions ........................................................................ 290<br />
10.1.4.1 Alertness <strong>and</strong> Attention ..................................................................... 290<br />
10.1.4.2 Learning <strong>and</strong> Memory ....................................................................... 293<br />
10.1.4.3 Other Cognitive Tasks ....................................................................... 295<br />
10.1.5 Conclusions ........................................................................................................ 296<br />
10.2 Psychopharmacology <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> ........................................................................... 297<br />
Domingos Sávio Nunes, Viviane de Moura Linck, Adriana Lourenço da Silva,<br />
Micheli Figueiró, <strong>and</strong> Elaine Elisabetsky<br />
10.2.1 Aromatic Plants Used in Traditional Medical Systems<br />
as Sedatives or Stimulants ................................................................................. 297<br />
10.2.2 Effects <strong>of</strong> EOs in Animal Models ...................................................................... 299<br />
10.2.2.1 Effects <strong>of</strong> Individual Components ..................................................... 301<br />
10.2.2.2 Effects <strong>of</strong> Inhaled EOs ...................................................................... 301<br />
10.2.3 Mechanism <strong>of</strong> Action Underlying Psychopharmacological Effects <strong>of</strong> EOs ...... 302<br />
References .................................................................................................................................. 306<br />
10.1 CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM EFFECTS OF ESSENTIAL OILS IN HUMANS<br />
Eva Heuberger<br />
10.1.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> attempts have been made to unravel the effects <strong>of</strong> natural essential oils (EOs) <strong>and</strong><br />
fragrances on the human central nervous system (CNS). Among these attempts two major lines <strong>of</strong><br />
research have been followed to identify psychoactive, particularly stimulating <strong>and</strong> sedative, effects<br />
<strong>of</strong> fragrances. On the one h<strong>and</strong>, researchers have investigated the influence <strong>of</strong> EOs <strong>and</strong> fragrances<br />
on brain potentials, which are indicative <strong>of</strong> the arousal state <strong>of</strong> the human organism by means <strong>of</strong><br />
281
282 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
neurophysiological methods. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, behavioral studies have elucidated the effects <strong>of</strong><br />
EOs <strong>and</strong> fragrances on basic <strong>and</strong> higher cognitive functions, such as alertness <strong>and</strong> attention, learning<br />
<strong>and</strong> memory, or problem solving. The scope <strong>of</strong> the following section, although not claiming to<br />
be complete, is to give an overview about the current knowledge in these fields. Much <strong>of</strong> the research<br />
reviewed has been carried out in healthy populations <strong>and</strong> only recently investigators have started to<br />
focus on clinical aspects <strong>of</strong> the administration <strong>of</strong> fragrances <strong>and</strong> EOs. However, since this topic is<br />
covered in another chapter <strong>of</strong> this volume, it is omitted here in the interest <strong>of</strong> space.<br />
Olfaction differs from other senses in several ways. First, in humans <strong>and</strong> many other mammals,<br />
the information received by peripheral olfactory receptor cells is mainly processed in brain areas<br />
located ipsilaterally to the stimulated side <strong>of</strong> the body, whereas in the other sensory systems, it is<br />
transferred to the contralateral hemisphere. Second, in contrast to the other sensory systems, olfactory<br />
information reaches a number <strong>of</strong> cortical areas without being relayed in the thalamus (K<strong>and</strong>el<br />
et al., 1991; Zilles <strong>and</strong> Rehkämpfer, 1998; Wiesmann et al., 2001) (Figure 10.1). Owing to this missing<br />
thalamic control as well as to the fact that the olfactory system presents anatomical connections<br />
<strong>and</strong> overlaps with brain areas involved in emotional processing, such as the amygdala, hippocampus,<br />
<strong>and</strong> prefrontal cortex <strong>of</strong> the limbic system (Reiman et al., 1997; Davidson <strong>and</strong> Irwin, 1999;<br />
Phan et al., 2002; Bermpohl et al., 2006), the effects <strong>of</strong> odorants on the organisms are supposedly<br />
exerted not only via pharmacological but also via psychological mechanisms. In humans <strong>and</strong> probably<br />
also in other mammals, psychological factors may be based on certain stimulus features, such<br />
los<br />
mos<br />
olf<br />
OB<br />
tos<br />
OT<br />
AON<br />
Tu<br />
L<br />
OpT<br />
PIR-FR<br />
PIR-TP<br />
AM<br />
EA<br />
G<br />
MB<br />
CP<br />
FIGURE 10.1 Macroscopic view <strong>of</strong> the human ventral forebrain <strong>and</strong> medial temporal lobes, depicting the<br />
olfactory tract, its primary projections, <strong>and</strong> surrounding nonolfactory structures. The right medial temporal<br />
lobe has been resected horizontally through the mid-portion <strong>of</strong> the amygdala (AM) to expose the olfactory cortex.<br />
AON, anterior olfactory nucleus; CP, cerebral peduncle; EA, entorhinal area; G, gyrus ambiens; L, limen<br />
insula; los, lateral olfactory sulcus; MB, mammillary body; mos, medial olfactory sulcus; olf, olfactory sulcus;<br />
PIR-FR, frontal piriform cortex; OB, olfactory bulb; OpT, optic tract; OT, olfactory tract; tos, transverse<br />
olfactory sulcus; Tu, olfactory tubercle; PIR-TP, temporal piriform cortex. Figure prepared with the help <strong>of</strong><br />
Dr. Eileen H. Bigio, Department <strong>of</strong> Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Chicago,<br />
Illinois. (From Gottfried, J.A. <strong>and</strong> D.A. Zald, 2005. Brain Res. Rev., 50: 287–304. With permission.)
Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in the Central Nervous System 283<br />
as odor valence (Baron <strong>and</strong> Thomley, 1994), on semantic cues, for example, memories <strong>and</strong> experiences<br />
associated with a particular odor, as well as on placebo effects related to the expectation <strong>of</strong><br />
certain effects (Jellinek, 1997). None <strong>of</strong> the latter mechanisms is substance, that is, odorant, specific<br />
but their effectiveness depends on cognitive mediation <strong>and</strong> control.<br />
Many odorants stimulate not only the olfactory system via the first cranial nerve (N. olfactorius)<br />
but also the trigeminal system via the fifth cranial nerve (N. trigeminus), which enervates the nasal<br />
mucosa. The trigeminal system is part <strong>of</strong> the body’s somatosensory system <strong>and</strong> mediates mechanical<br />
<strong>and</strong> temperature-related sensations, such as itching <strong>and</strong> burning or warmth <strong>and</strong> cooling sensations.<br />
Trigeminal information reaches the brain via the trigeminal ganglion <strong>and</strong> the ventral posterior<br />
nucleus <strong>of</strong> the thalamus. The primary cortical projection area <strong>of</strong> the somatosensory system is the<br />
contralateral postcentral gyrus <strong>of</strong> the parietal lobe (Zilles <strong>and</strong> Rehkämpfer, 1998). The reticular<br />
formation in the brain stem, which is part <strong>of</strong> the reticular activating system (RAS) (Figure 10.2),<br />
receives collaterals from the trigeminal system. Thus, trigeminal stimuli have direct effects on<br />
arousal. Utilizing this direct connection, highly potent trigeminal stimulants, such as ammonia <strong>and</strong><br />
menthol, have been used in the past in smelling salts to awaken people who fainted.<br />
It has been shown in experimental animals that, due to their lipophilic properties, fragrances<br />
not only penetrate the skin (Hotchkiss, 1998) but also the blood–brain barrier (Buchbauer et al.,<br />
1993). Also, odorants have been found to bind to several types <strong>of</strong> brain receptors (Aoshima<br />
<strong>and</strong> Hamamoto, 1999; Elisabetsky et al., 1999; Okugawa et al., 2000), <strong>and</strong> it has been suggested<br />
Hypothalamus<br />
Basal<br />
ganglia<br />
Cortex<br />
Thalamus<br />
Midbrain<br />
Raphé Nuclei<br />
Amygdala<br />
Pons<br />
Medulla<br />
Cerebellum<br />
Locus ceruleus<br />
Cell<br />
bodies<br />
Axon<br />
terminals<br />
Noradrenergic neurons<br />
Serotonergic neurons<br />
FIGURE 10.2 Schematic <strong>of</strong> the RAS with noradrenergic <strong>and</strong> serotonergic connections. (From Grilly, D.M.,<br />
2002. Drugs & Human Behavior. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. With permission.)
284 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
that these odorant–receptor interactions are responsible for psychoactive effects <strong>of</strong> fragrances in<br />
experimental animals. With regard to these findings, it is important to note that Heuberger et al.<br />
(2001) have observed differential effects <strong>of</strong> fragrances as a function <strong>of</strong> chirality. It seems likely that<br />
such differences in effectiveness are related to enantiomeric selectivity <strong>of</strong> receptor proteins. However,<br />
the question whether effects <strong>of</strong> fragrances on human arousal <strong>and</strong> cognition rely on a similar psychopharmacological<br />
mechanism remains to be answered.<br />
10.1.2 ACTIVATION AND AROUSAL: DEFINITION AND NEUROANATOMICAL CONSIDERATIONS<br />
Activation, or arousal, refers to the ability <strong>of</strong> an organism to adapt to internal <strong>and</strong> external challenges<br />
(Sch<strong>and</strong>ry, 1989). Activation is an elementary process that serves in the preparation for overt<br />
activity. Nevertheless, it does not necessarily result in overt behavior (Duffy, 1972). Activation varies<br />
in degree <strong>and</strong> can be described along a continuum from deep sleep to overexcitement. Early<br />
theoretical accounts <strong>of</strong> activation have emphasized physiological responses as the sole measurable<br />
correlate <strong>of</strong> arousal. Current models, however, consider physiological, cognitive, <strong>and</strong> emotional<br />
activity as observable consequences <strong>of</strong> activation processes. It has been shown that arousal processes<br />
within each <strong>of</strong> these three systems, that is, physiological, cognitive, <strong>and</strong> emotional, can occur<br />
to varying degrees so that the response <strong>of</strong> one system need not be correlated linearly to that <strong>of</strong> the<br />
other systems (Baltissen <strong>and</strong> Heimann, 1995).<br />
It has long been established that the RAS, which comprises the reticular formation with its sensory<br />
afferents <strong>and</strong> widespread hypothalamic, thalamic, <strong>and</strong> cortical projections, plays a crucial role<br />
in the control <strong>of</strong> both phasic <strong>and</strong> tonic activation processes (Becker-Carus, 1981; Sch<strong>and</strong>ry, 1989).<br />
Pribram <strong>and</strong> McGuinness (1975) distinguish three separate but interacting neural networks in the<br />
control <strong>of</strong> activation (Figure 10.3). The arousal network involves amygdalar <strong>and</strong> related frontal<br />
cortical structures <strong>and</strong> regulates phasic physiological responses to novel incoming information. The<br />
activation network centers on the basal ganglia <strong>of</strong> the forebrain <strong>and</strong> controls the tonic physiological<br />
readiness to respond. Finally, the effort network, which comprises hippocampal circuits, coordinates<br />
the arousal <strong>and</strong> activation networks. Noradrenergic projections from the locus ceruleus, which<br />
is located within the dorsal wall <strong>of</strong> the rostral pons, are particularly important in the regulation <strong>of</strong><br />
OFC<br />
HI<br />
CC<br />
SMP<br />
AM<br />
S<br />
CS<br />
MDT<br />
ADT<br />
LDT<br />
AH<br />
PH<br />
SR<br />
RF<br />
T<br />
SC<br />
SC<br />
FIGURE 10.3 Control <strong>of</strong> activation processes. OFC, orbit<strong>of</strong>rontal cortex; AM, amygdala; MDT, medial<br />
dorsal thalamus; AH, anterior hypothalamus; RF, reticular formation; SC, spinal cord; HI, hippocampus; CC,<br />
cingulate cortex; S, septum; ADT, anterior dorsal thalamus; PH, posterior hypothalamus; SMP, sensory-motor<br />
projections; CS, corpus striatum; LDT, lateral dorsal thalamus; SR, subthalamic regions; T, tectum. Left,<br />
structures <strong>of</strong> the arousal network; middle, structures <strong>of</strong> the effort network; right, structures <strong>of</strong> the activation<br />
network. (Adapted from Pribram, K. H. <strong>and</strong> D. McGuinness, 1975. Psychol. Rev., 82(2): 116–149.)
Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in the Central Nervous System 285<br />
circadian alertness, the sleep–wake rhythm, <strong>and</strong> the sustenance <strong>of</strong> alertness (alerting) (Pedersen<br />
et al., 1998; Aston-Jones et al., 2001). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, tonic alertness seems to be dependent on<br />
cholinergic (Baxter <strong>and</strong> Chiba, 1999; Gill et al., 2000) frontal <strong>and</strong> inferior parietal thalamic structures<br />
<strong>of</strong> the right hemisphere (Sturm et al., 1999). Other networks that are involved in the control <strong>of</strong><br />
arousal <strong>and</strong> attentional functions are found in posterior parts <strong>of</strong> the brain, for example, the parietal<br />
cortex, superior colliculi, <strong>and</strong> posterior-lateral thalamus, as well as in anterior regions, for example,<br />
the cingular <strong>and</strong> prefrontal cortices (Posner <strong>and</strong> Petersen, 1990; Paus, 2001).<br />
10.1.3 INFLUENCE OF EOS AND FRAGRANCES ON BRAIN POTENTIALS INDICATIVE OF AROUSAL<br />
10.1.3.1 Spontaneous Electroencephalogram Activity<br />
Recordings <strong>of</strong> spontaneous electroencephalogram (EEG) activity during the administration <strong>of</strong> EOs<br />
<strong>and</strong> fragrances have widely been used to assess stimulant <strong>and</strong> sedative effects <strong>of</strong> these substances.<br />
Particular attention has been paid to changes within the a <strong>and</strong> b b<strong>and</strong>s, sometimes also the q b<strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> the EEG in response to olfactory stimulation since these b<strong>and</strong>s are thought to be most indicative<br />
<strong>of</strong> central arousal processes. Alpha waves are slow brain waves within a frequency range <strong>of</strong> 8–13 Hz<br />
<strong>and</strong> amplitudes between 5 <strong>and</strong> 100 mV, which typically occur over posterior areas <strong>of</strong> the brain in an<br />
awake but relaxed state, especially with closed eyes. The a rhythm disappears immediately when<br />
subjects open their eyes <strong>and</strong> when cognitive activity is required, for example, when external stimuli<br />
are processed or tasks are solved. This phenomenon is <strong>of</strong>ten referred to as a block or desynchronization.<br />
Simultaneously with the a block, faster brain waves occur, such as b waves with smaller<br />
amplitudes (2–20 mV) <strong>and</strong> frequencies between 14 <strong>and</strong> 30 Hz. The b rhythm, which is most evident<br />
frontally, is characteristic <strong>of</strong> alertness, attention, <strong>and</strong> arousal. In contrast, q waves are very slow<br />
brain waves occurring in fronto-temporal areas with amplitudes between 5 <strong>and</strong> 100 mV in the frequency<br />
range between 4 <strong>and</strong> 7 Hz. Although the q rhythm is most commonly associated with<br />
drowsiness <strong>and</strong> light sleep, some researchers found q activity to correlate with memory processes<br />
(Grunwald et al., 1999; Hoedlmoser et al., 2007) <strong>and</strong> creativity (Razumnikova, 2007). Other authors<br />
found correlations between q activity <strong>and</strong> ratings <strong>of</strong> anxiety <strong>and</strong> tension (Lorig <strong>and</strong> Schwartz, 1988).<br />
With regard to animal olfaction, it has been proposed that the q rhythm generated by the hippocampus<br />
is concomitant to sniffing <strong>and</strong> allows for encoding <strong>and</strong> integration <strong>of</strong> olfactory information with<br />
other cognitive <strong>and</strong> motor processes (Kepecs et al., 2006).<br />
A large number <strong>of</strong> measures can be derived from recordings <strong>of</strong> the spontaneous EEG. Time (index)<br />
or voltage (power)-based rates <strong>of</strong> typical frequency b<strong>and</strong>s, as well as ratios between certain frequency<br />
b<strong>and</strong>s (e.g., between the a <strong>and</strong> b b<strong>and</strong> or the q <strong>and</strong> b b<strong>and</strong>) within a selected time interval are most<br />
commonly used to quantify EEG patterns. Period analysis quantifies the number <strong>of</strong> waves that occur<br />
in the various frequency b<strong>and</strong>s within a distinct time interval <strong>of</strong> the EEG record <strong>and</strong> is supposed to be<br />
more sensitive to task-related changes than spectral analysis (Lorig, 1989). Other parameters that<br />
describe the covariation <strong>of</strong> a given signal at different electrodes are coherence <strong>and</strong> neural synchrony.<br />
These measures inform on the functional link between brain areas (Oken et al., 2006).<br />
Generally speaking, the pattern <strong>of</strong> the spontaneous EEG varies with the arousal level <strong>of</strong> the CNS.<br />
Thus, different states <strong>of</strong> consciousness, such as sleep, wakefulness, or meditation, can be distinguished<br />
by their characteristic EEG patterns. For instance, an increase in central activation is typically<br />
characterized by a decrease in a <strong>and</strong> an increase in b activity (Sch<strong>and</strong>ry, 1989). More precisely,<br />
a decline <strong>of</strong> a <strong>and</strong> b power together with a decrease <strong>of</strong> a index <strong>and</strong> an increase <strong>of</strong> b <strong>and</strong> q activity<br />
have been observed under arousing conditions, that is, in a mental calculation <strong>and</strong> a psychosocial<br />
stress paradigm (Walschburger, 1976). Also when subjects are maximally attentive, frequencies in<br />
the a b<strong>and</strong> are attenuated <strong>and</strong> activity in the b <strong>and</strong> even higher frequency b<strong>and</strong>s can be observed.<br />
Fatigue <strong>and</strong> performance decrements in situations requiring high levels <strong>of</strong> attention are <strong>of</strong>ten associated<br />
with increases in q <strong>and</strong> decreases in b activity (Oken et al., 2006). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, drowsiness<br />
<strong>and</strong> the onset <strong>of</strong> sleep are characterized by an increase in slow <strong>and</strong> a decrease in fast EEG<br />
waves. However, high activity in the a b<strong>and</strong>, particularly in the range between 7 <strong>and</strong> 10 Hz, is not
286 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
indicative <strong>of</strong> low arousal states <strong>of</strong> the brain, such as relaxation, drowsiness, <strong>and</strong> the onset <strong>of</strong> sleep,<br />
but rather seems to be a component <strong>of</strong> selective neural inhibition processes that are necessary for a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> cognitive processes, such as perception, attention, <strong>and</strong> memory (Miller <strong>and</strong> O’Callaghan,<br />
2006; Palva <strong>and</strong> Palva, 2007).<br />
Because changes <strong>of</strong> spontaneous EEG activity accompany a wide range <strong>of</strong> cognitive as well as<br />
emotional brain processes <strong>and</strong> “EEG measurements […] do not tell investigators what the brain is<br />
doing” (Lorig 1989, p. 93), it is somewhat naïve to interpret changes that are induced by the application<br />
<strong>of</strong> an odorant as a result <strong>of</strong> a single <strong>and</strong> specific process, particularly when no other correlates<br />
<strong>of</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> interest are assessed. Nevertheless, this is exactly the approach that has been<br />
taken by many researchers to identify stimulant or relaxing effects <strong>of</strong> odors. The simplest, but in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> interpretation <strong>of</strong> the results probably most problematic setup for such experiments is the<br />
comparison <strong>of</strong> spontaneous EEG activity in response to odorants with a no-odor baseline. Using<br />
this design, Sugano (1992) observed increased EEG a activity after inhalation <strong>of</strong> a-pinene (1),<br />
1,8-cineole (2), lavender, s<strong>and</strong>alwood, musk, <strong>and</strong> eucalyptus odors. Considering that traditional<br />
aromatherapy discriminates these fragrances by their psychoactive effects, for example, lavender<br />
is assigned relaxing properties while eucalyptus is supposedly stimulant (Valnet, 1990); these findings<br />
are at least rather curious. Also Ishikawa et al. (2002) recorded the spontaneous EEG in<br />
13 Japanese subjects while drinking either lemon juice with a supplement <strong>of</strong> lemon odor or lemon<br />
juice without it. It was shown that a power was enhanced by supplementation with lemon odor, an<br />
indicative <strong>of</strong> increased relaxation. Again, with regard to aromatherapeutical accounts <strong>of</strong> the lemon<br />
EO this result is somewhat counterintuitive, even more so as in the same study the juice supplemented<br />
with lemon odor increased spontaneous locomotion in experimental animals. Haneyama<br />
<strong>and</strong> Kagatani (2007) tested a fragrant spray made from extracts <strong>of</strong> Chinese spikenard roots<br />
[Nardostachys chinensis Batalin (Valerianaceae)] in butylene glycol <strong>and</strong> found increased a activity<br />
in subjects under stress. This finding was interpreted by the authors as demonstrating a sedative<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> the extract. However, it is unknown how stress was induced in the subjects <strong>and</strong> how it was<br />
measured. Similarly, Ishiyama (2000) concluded from measurements <strong>of</strong> the frequency fluctuation<br />
patterns <strong>of</strong> the a b<strong>and</strong> that smelling a blend <strong>of</strong> terpene compounds, typically found in forests,<br />
induced feelings <strong>of</strong> refreshment <strong>and</strong> relaxation in human subjects without proper description <strong>of</strong><br />
how these feelings were assessed.<br />
Inconclusive findings as those described above are not unexpected with such simple experimental<br />
designs as there are several problems associated with this kind <strong>of</strong> experiments. First, a no-odor<br />
baseline is <strong>of</strong>ten inappropriate as it does not control for cognitive activity <strong>of</strong> the subject. For instance,<br />
subjects might be puzzled by the fact that they do not smell anything eventually focusing attention<br />
to the search for an odor. This may lead to quite high arousal levels rather than the intended resting<br />
brain state. This was the case with Lorig <strong>and</strong> Schwarzt (1988), who tested changes <strong>of</strong> spontaneous<br />
EEG in response to spiced apple, eucalyptus, <strong>and</strong> lavender fragrances diluted in an odorless base:<br />
contrary to the authors’ expectations it was found that a activity in the no-odor condition was less<br />
than that during odor presentation.<br />
Considering the various mechanisms outlined by Jellinek (1997) by which fragrances influence<br />
human arousal <strong>and</strong> behavior, another inherent problem <strong>of</strong> such simple designs is that little is<br />
known about how subjects process stimulus-related information, for example, the pleasantness or<br />
intensity <strong>of</strong> an odorant, <strong>and</strong> whether or not higher cognitive processes related to the odorant are<br />
initiated by the stimulation. For instance, subjects might be able to identify <strong>and</strong> label some odors<br />
but might fail to do so with others; similarly, some odors might trigger the recall <strong>of</strong> associated<br />
memories while others might not. In order to assess psychoactive effects <strong>of</strong> EOs <strong>and</strong> fragrances, it<br />
seems necessary to control for these factors, for instance by assessing additional variables that<br />
inform on the subject’s perception <strong>of</strong> primary <strong>and</strong> secondary stimulus features <strong>and</strong> that correlate<br />
to the subject’s cognitive or emotional arousal state. In the above-mentioned study, Lorig <strong>and</strong><br />
Schwarzt (1988) collected ratings <strong>of</strong> intensity <strong>and</strong> pleasantness <strong>of</strong> the tested fragrances as well as<br />
subjective ratings <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> affective states in addition to the EEG recordings. Analysis <strong>of</strong> the
Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in the Central Nervous System 287<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> EEG q activity revealed that the spiced apple odor produced more relaxation than<br />
lavender <strong>and</strong> eucalyptus; the analysis <strong>of</strong> the secondary variables suggested that this relaxing effect<br />
was correlated with subjective estimates <strong>of</strong> anxiety <strong>and</strong> tension. As to the EEG patterns, similar<br />
results were observed when subjects imagined food odors <strong>and</strong> practiced relaxation techniques.<br />
Thus, the authors conclude that the relaxing effect <strong>of</strong> spiced apple was probably related to its association<br />
with food. These cognitive influences also seem to be a plausible explanation for the<br />
increase in a power by lemon odor in the Ishikawa et al. (2002) study. Other studies related to food<br />
odors were conducted by Kaneda et al. (2005, 2006). These authors investigated the influence <strong>of</strong><br />
smelling beer flavors on the frequency fluctuation <strong>of</strong> a waves in frontal areas <strong>of</strong> the brain. The<br />
results showed relaxing effects <strong>of</strong> the aroma <strong>of</strong> hop extracts as well as <strong>of</strong> linalool (3). In addition,<br />
in the right hemisphere these fluctuations were correlated with subjective estimates <strong>of</strong> arousal <strong>and</strong><br />
with the intensity <strong>of</strong> the hop aroma. Lee et al. (1994) also found evidence for differential EEG patterns<br />
as a function <strong>of</strong> odor intensity for citrus, lavender, <strong>and</strong> a floral odor. A 10-min exposure to<br />
the weaker intensity <strong>of</strong> the citrus fragrance in comparison to lavender odor increased the rate <strong>of</strong><br />
occipital a. Moreover, there was a general trend for citrus to be rated as more comfortable than<br />
other fragrances. In contrast, the higher intensity <strong>of</strong> the floral fragrance increased the rate <strong>of</strong><br />
occipital b more than the lavender odor.<br />
Several authors have shown influences <strong>of</strong> odor pleasantness <strong>and</strong> familiarity on changes <strong>of</strong> the<br />
spontaneous EEG. For instance, Kaetsu et al. (1994) reported that pleasant odors increased the a<br />
activity, while unpleasant ones decreased it. In a study on the effects <strong>of</strong> lavender <strong>and</strong> jasmine odor<br />
on electrical brain activity (Yagyu, 1994), it was shown that changes in the a, b, <strong>and</strong> q b<strong>and</strong>s in<br />
response to these fragrances were similar when subjects rated them as pleasant, while lavender <strong>and</strong><br />
jasmine odor led to distinct patterns when they were rated as unpleasant. Increases <strong>of</strong> a activity in<br />
response to pleasant odors might be explained by altered breathing patterns since it has been demonstrated<br />
that pleasant odors induce deeper inhalations <strong>and</strong> exhalations than unpleasant odors, <strong>and</strong><br />
that this form <strong>of</strong> breathing by itself increases the activity in the a b<strong>and</strong> (Lorig, 2000). Masago et al.<br />
(2000) tested the effects <strong>of</strong> lavender, chamomile, s<strong>and</strong>alwood, <strong>and</strong> eugenol (4) fragrances on ongoing<br />
EEG activity <strong>and</strong> self-ratings <strong>of</strong> comfort <strong>and</strong> found a significant positive correlation between the<br />
degree <strong>of</strong> comfort <strong>and</strong> the odorants’ potency to decrease the a activity in parietal <strong>and</strong> posterior<br />
temporal regions. In relation to the previously described investigations, this finding is rather difficult<br />
to explain, although it differs from the other studies in that it differentiated between electrode<br />
sites rather than reporting merely global changes in electrical brain activity. Therefore, this result<br />
suggests that topographical differences in electrical brain activity induced by fragrances may be<br />
important <strong>and</strong> need further investigation. In fact, differences in hemispheric localization <strong>of</strong> spontaneous<br />
EEG activity in response to pleasant <strong>and</strong> unpleasant fragrances seem to be quite consistent.<br />
While pleasant odors induced higher activation in left frontal brain regions, unpleasant ones led to<br />
bilateral <strong>and</strong> widespread activation (Kim <strong>and</strong> Watanuki, 2003) or no differences were observed<br />
when an unpleasant odor (valerian) was compared to a no-odor control condition (Kline et al.,<br />
2000). Another interesting finding in the study <strong>of</strong> Kim <strong>and</strong> Watanuki (2003) was that EEG activity<br />
in response to the tested fragrances was observed when subjects were at rest but vanished after<br />
performing a mental task. The importance <strong>of</strong> distinguishing EEG activity arising from different<br />
areas <strong>of</strong> the brain is highlighted by an investigation by Van Toller et al. (1993). These authors<br />
recorded a wave activity at 28 sites <strong>of</strong> the scalp immediately after the exposure to a number <strong>of</strong> fragrances<br />
covering a range <strong>of</strong> different odor types <strong>and</strong> hedonic tones at iso-intense concentrations; the<br />
odorants had to be rated in terms <strong>of</strong> pleasantness, familiarity, <strong>and</strong> intensity. It was shown that in<br />
posterior regions <strong>of</strong> the brain changes in a activity in response to these odors compared to an odorless<br />
blank were organized in distinct topographical maps. Moreover, a activity in a set <strong>of</strong> electrodes<br />
at frontal <strong>and</strong> temporal sites correlated with the psychometric ratings <strong>of</strong> the fragrances.<br />
As to influences <strong>of</strong> the familiarity <strong>of</strong> or experience with fragrances, Kawano (2001) reported<br />
that the odors <strong>of</strong> lemon, lavender, patchouli, marjoram, rosemary, <strong>and</strong> s<strong>and</strong>alwood increased a<br />
activity over occipital electrode sites in subjects to whom these fragrances were well known. On the
288 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
one h<strong>and</strong>, lag times between frontal <strong>and</strong> occipital a phase were shorter in subjects less experienced<br />
with the fragrances, indicating that these subjects were concentrating more on smelling—<strong>and</strong> probably<br />
identifying—the odorants. These findings were confirmed in an investigation comparing pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
perfume researchers, perfume salespersons, <strong>and</strong> general workers (Min et al., 2003). This<br />
study showed that measures <strong>of</strong> cortico-cortical connectivity, that is, the averaged cross mutual<br />
information content, in odor processing were more pronounced in frontal areas with perfume<br />
researchers, whereas with perfume salespersons <strong>and</strong> general workers a larger network <strong>of</strong> posterior<br />
temporal, parietal, <strong>and</strong> frontal regions was activated. These results could result from a greater<br />
involvement <strong>of</strong> orbit<strong>of</strong>rontal cortex neurons in perfume researchers, who exhibit high sophistication<br />
in discriminating <strong>and</strong> identifying odors. Moreover, it was shown that the value <strong>of</strong> the averaged cross<br />
mutual information content was inversely related to preference in perfume researchers <strong>and</strong> perfume<br />
salespersons, but not in general workers.<br />
As pointed out above, the administration <strong>of</strong> EO <strong>and</strong> fragrances to naïve subjects can lead to<br />
cognitive processes that are unknown to the investigator, <strong>and</strong> sometimes even the subject, but that<br />
nevertheless affect spontaneous EEG activity. Some researchers have sought to solve this problem<br />
by engaging subjects in a secondary task while the influence <strong>of</strong> the odorant <strong>of</strong> interest is assessed.<br />
This procedure does not only draw the subject’s attention away from the odor stimulus, but also<br />
provides the desired information about his/her arousal state. Another benefit <strong>of</strong> such experimental<br />
designs is that the task may control for the subject’s arousal state if a certain amount <strong>of</strong> attention is<br />
required to perform it. Measurement <strong>of</strong> changes <strong>of</strong> a <strong>and</strong> q activity in the presence or absence <strong>of</strong><br />
1,8-cineole (2), methyl jasmonate (5), <strong>and</strong> trans-jasmin lactone (6) in subjects who performed a<br />
simple visual task showed that the increase in slow wave activity was attenuated by 1,8-cineole (2)<br />
<strong>and</strong> methyl jasmonate (5), while augmented by trans-jasmin lactone (6) (Nakagawa et al. 1992).<br />
At least in the case <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole (2) these findings are supported by results from experimental<br />
animals <strong>and</strong> humans, indicating activating effects <strong>of</strong> this odorant (Kovar et al., 1987; Nasel et al.,<br />
1994; Bensafi et al., 2002). An investigation <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> lemon odor EEG a, b, <strong>and</strong> q activity<br />
during the administration <strong>of</strong> lemon odor showed that the odor reduced power in the lower a range<br />
while it increased power in the higher a, lower b, <strong>and</strong> lower q b<strong>and</strong>s (Krizhanovs’kii et al., 2004).<br />
These findings <strong>of</strong> increased arousal were in agreement with better performance in a cognitive task.<br />
In addition, it was shown that inhalation <strong>of</strong> the lemon fragrance was most effective during rest <strong>and</strong><br />
in the first minutes <strong>of</strong> the cognitive task, but wore <strong>of</strong>f after less than 10 min. In several experiments,<br />
the group <strong>of</strong> Sugawara demonstrated complex interactions between electrical brain activity induced<br />
by the exposure to fragrances, sensory pr<strong>of</strong>iling, <strong>and</strong> various types <strong>of</strong> tasks (Sugawara et al., 2000;<br />
Satoh <strong>and</strong> Sugawara, 2003). In one study they showed that the odor <strong>of</strong> peppermint, in contrast to<br />
basil, was rated less favorable on a number <strong>of</strong> descriptors <strong>and</strong> reduced the magnitude <strong>of</strong> b waves<br />
after as compared to before performance <strong>of</strong> a cognitive task. In a similar investigation, it was shown<br />
that the sensory evaluation as well as changes in spontaneous EEG activity in response to the odors<br />
<strong>of</strong> the linalool enantiomers differed as a function <strong>of</strong> the molecular structure <strong>and</strong> the kind <strong>of</strong> task.<br />
For instance, R-(-)-linalool (7) was rated more favorable <strong>and</strong> led to larger decreases <strong>of</strong> b activity<br />
after listening to natural sounds than before. In contrast, after as compared to before cognitive effort<br />
R-(-)-linalool (7) was rated as less favorable <strong>and</strong> tended to increase b power. A similar pattern was<br />
found for RS-(±)-linalool (3), whereas for S-(+)-linalool (8) the pattern was different, particularly<br />
with regard to EEG activity.<br />
In the study <strong>of</strong> Yagyu (1994), the effects <strong>of</strong> lavender <strong>and</strong> jasmine fragrances on the performance<br />
in a critical flicker fusion <strong>and</strong> an auditory reaction time task were assessed in addition to<br />
changes <strong>of</strong> the ongoing EEG. It was demonstrated that in contrast to the EEG findings, lavender<br />
decreased performance in both tasks independent <strong>of</strong> its hedonic evaluation. Jasmine, however,<br />
had no effect on task performance. The EEG changes in response to these odorants might well<br />
explain their effects on performance: lavender induced decreases <strong>of</strong> activity in the b b<strong>and</strong>, which<br />
is associated with states <strong>of</strong> low attention regardless <strong>of</strong> being rated as pleasant or unpleasant;<br />
jasmine, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, increased EEG b activity when it was judged unpleasant but lowered
Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in the Central Nervous System 289<br />
b activity when judged pleasant, so that overall its effect on performance levelled out. The effects<br />
<strong>of</strong> lavender <strong>and</strong> rosemary fragrances on electrical brain activity, mood states, <strong>and</strong> math computations<br />
were investigated by Diego, Field, <strong>and</strong> co-workers (Diego et al., 1998; Field et al., 2005).<br />
These investigations showed that the exposure to lavender increased b power, elevated feelings<br />
<strong>of</strong> relaxation, reduced feelings <strong>of</strong> depression, <strong>and</strong> improved both speed <strong>and</strong> accuracy in the cognitive<br />
task. In contrast, rosemary odor decreased frontal a <strong>and</strong> b power, decreased feelings <strong>of</strong><br />
anxiety, increased feelings <strong>of</strong> relaxation <strong>and</strong> alertness, <strong>and</strong> increased speed in the math computations.<br />
The EEG results were interpreted as indicating increased drowsiness in the lavender group<br />
<strong>and</strong> increased alertness in the rosemary group; however, the behavioral data showed performance<br />
improvement <strong>and</strong> similar mood ratings in both groups. These findings suggest that different<br />
electrophysiological arousal patterns may still be associated with similar behavioral arousal patterns<br />
emphasizing the importance <strong>of</strong> collecting additional endpoints to evaluate psychoactive<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> EO <strong>and</strong> fragrances.<br />
10.1.3.2 Contingent Negative Variation<br />
The contingent negative variation (CNV) is a slow, negative event-related brain potential, which is<br />
generated when an imperative stimulus is preceded by a warning stimulus <strong>and</strong> reflects expectancy<br />
<strong>and</strong> preparation (Walter et al., 1964). The amplitude <strong>of</strong> the CNV is correlated to attention <strong>and</strong><br />
arousal (Tecce, 1972). Since changes <strong>of</strong> the magnitude <strong>and</strong> latency <strong>of</strong> CNV components have long<br />
been associated with the effects <strong>of</strong> psychoactive drugs (Kopell et al., 1974; Ashton et al., 1977),<br />
measurement <strong>of</strong> the CNV has also been used to evaluate psychostimulant <strong>and</strong> sedating effects <strong>of</strong><br />
EOs <strong>and</strong> fragrances. In a pioneering investigation, Torii et al. (1988) measured CNV magnitude<br />
changes evoked by a variety <strong>of</strong> EOs, such as jasmine, lavender, <strong>and</strong> rose oil, in male subjects. CNV<br />
was recorded at the frontal, central, <strong>and</strong> parietal sites after the presentation <strong>of</strong> an odorous or blank<br />
stimulus in the context <strong>of</strong> a cued reaction time paradigm. In addition, physiological markers <strong>of</strong><br />
arousal, that is, skin potential level <strong>and</strong> heart rate, were simultaneously measured. Results showed<br />
that at frontal sites the amplitude <strong>of</strong> the early negative shift <strong>of</strong> the CNV was significantly altered<br />
after the presentation <strong>of</strong> odor stimuli, <strong>and</strong> that these changes were mostly congruent with stimulating<br />
<strong>and</strong> sedative properties reported for the tested oils in the traditional aromatherapy literature. In<br />
contrast to other psychoactive substances, such as caffeine or benzodiazepines, presentation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
EOs neither affected physiological parameters nor reaction times. The authors concluded that the<br />
EOs tested influenced brain waves “almost exclusively” while having no effects on other indicators<br />
<strong>of</strong> arousal.<br />
Subsequently, CNV recordings have been used by a number <strong>of</strong> researchers on a variety <strong>of</strong> EOs<br />
<strong>and</strong> fragrances to establish effects <strong>of</strong> odors on the human brain along the activation–relaxation<br />
continuum. For instance, Sugano (1992) in the aforementioned study demonstrated that a-pinene<br />
(1), s<strong>and</strong>alwood, <strong>and</strong> lavender odor increased the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the CNV in healthy young adults,<br />
whereas eucalyptus reduced it. It is interesting to note, however, that all <strong>of</strong> these odors—despite<br />
their differential influence on the CNV—increased spontaneous a activity in the same experiment.<br />
An increase <strong>of</strong> CNV magnitude was also observed with the EO from pine needles (Manley, 1993),<br />
which was interpreted as having a stimulating effect. Aoki (1996) investigated the influence <strong>of</strong><br />
odors from several coniferous woods, that is, hinoki [Chamaecyparis obtusa (Siebold & Zucc.)<br />
Endl. (Cupressaceae)], sugi [Cryptomeria japonica D.Don (Cupressaceae)], akamatsu [Pinus densifl<br />
ora Siebold & Zucc. (Pinaceae)], hiba [Thujopsis dolabrata var. hondai Siebold & Zucc.<br />
(Cupressaceae)], Alaska cedar [Chamaecyparis nootkatensis (D.Don) Spach (Cupressaceae)],<br />
Douglas fir [Pseudotsuga manziesii (Mirbel) Franco (Pinaceae)], <strong>and</strong> Western red cedar [Thuja<br />
plicata Donn (Cupressaceae)], on the CNV <strong>and</strong> found conflicting effects: the amplitude <strong>of</strong> the early<br />
CNV component at central sites was decreased by these wood odors, <strong>and</strong> the a/b-wave ratio <strong>of</strong> the<br />
EEG increased. Moreover, the decrease <strong>of</strong> CNV magnitude was correlated with the amount <strong>of</strong><br />
a-pinene (1) in the tested wood odors. Also Sawada et al. (2000) measured changes <strong>of</strong> the early<br />
component <strong>of</strong> the CNV in response to stimulation with terpenes found in the EO <strong>of</strong> woods <strong>and</strong>
290 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
leaves. These authors noticed a reduction <strong>of</strong> the CNV magnitude after the administration <strong>of</strong><br />
a-pinene (1), D-3-carene (9), <strong>and</strong> bornyl acetate (10). However, a more recent investigation (Hiruma<br />
et al., 2002) showed that hiba [Thujopsis dolabrata Siebold & Zucc. (Cupressaceae)] odor increased<br />
the CNV magnitude at frontal <strong>and</strong> central sites <strong>and</strong> shortened reaction times to the imperative<br />
stimulus in female subjects. These authors thus concluded that the odor <strong>of</strong> hiba heightened the<br />
arousal level <strong>of</strong> the CNS.<br />
Although the CNV is believed to be largely independent <strong>of</strong> individual differences, such as age,<br />
sex, or race (Manley, 1997), there seem to be cognitive influences that must not be neglected when<br />
interpreting the effects <strong>of</strong> odor stimuli on the CNV. Lorig <strong>and</strong> Roberts (1990) repeated the study by<br />
Torii et al., (1988) <strong>and</strong> investigated cognitive factors by introducing a manipulation <strong>of</strong> their subjects<br />
as an additional variable into the paradigm. In this experiment subjects were exposed to the original<br />
two odors, that is, lavender <strong>and</strong> jasmine, referred to as odor A <strong>and</strong> odor B, respectively, as well as to<br />
a mixture <strong>of</strong> the two fragrances. However, in half <strong>of</strong> the trials in which the mixture was administered<br />
subjects were led to believe that they received a low concentration <strong>of</strong> odor A, whereas in the<br />
other half <strong>of</strong> trials they thought that they would be exposed to a low concentration <strong>of</strong> odor B. In none<br />
<strong>of</strong> the four conditions were the subjects given the correct odor names. As in the Torii et al. study,<br />
lavender reduced the amplitude <strong>of</strong> the CNV whereas jasmine increased it. When the mixture was<br />
administered, however, the CNV magnitude decreased when subjects believed to receive a low<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> lavender, but increased when they thought they were inhaling a low concentration<br />
<strong>of</strong> jasmine. This means that the alteration <strong>of</strong> the CNV amplitude was not solely related to the substance<br />
that had been administered but also related to the expectation <strong>of</strong> the subjects. Another point<br />
made by Lorig <strong>and</strong> Roberts (1990) is that in their study self-report data indicated that lavender was<br />
actually rated as more arousing than jasmine. Since low CNV amplitudes are not only associated<br />
with low arousal but also with high arousal in the context <strong>of</strong> distraction (Travis <strong>and</strong> Tecce, 1998),<br />
the lavender odor might in fact have led to higher arousal levels than jasmine even though the CNV<br />
magnitude was smaller with lavender. Other authors have noted that CNV changes might not only<br />
reflect effects <strong>of</strong> odor stimuli but also the anticipation, expectancy, <strong>and</strong> the emotional state <strong>of</strong> the<br />
subjects who are exposed to these odorants (Hiruma et al., 2005). The involvement <strong>of</strong> these <strong>and</strong><br />
other cognitive factors might well explain why the findings <strong>of</strong> CNV changes in response to odorants<br />
are rather inconsistent.<br />
10.1.4 EFFECTS OF EOS AND FRAGRANCES ON SELECTED BASIC<br />
AND HIGHER COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS<br />
Psychoactive effects <strong>of</strong> odorants at the cognitive level have been explored in humans using a large<br />
number <strong>of</strong> methods. A variety <strong>of</strong> testing procedures ranging from simple alertness or mathematical<br />
tasks to tests that assess higher cognitive functions, such as memory or creativity, have been<br />
employed to study stimulant or relaxing/sedating effects <strong>of</strong> EOs <strong>and</strong> fragrances. Nevertheless, the<br />
efficiency <strong>of</strong> odorants is commonly defined by changes in performance in such tasks as a function<br />
<strong>of</strong> the exposure to fragrances.<br />
10.1.4.1 Alertness <strong>and</strong> Attention<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> studies are available on the influence <strong>of</strong> fragrances on attentional functions. The integrity<br />
<strong>and</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> the processing efficiency <strong>of</strong> the attentional systems is a fundamental prerequisite<br />
<strong>of</strong> all higher cognitive functions. Attentional functions can be divided into four categories: alertness,<br />
selective <strong>and</strong> divided attention, <strong>and</strong> vigilance (Posner <strong>and</strong> Rafal, 1987; Keller <strong>and</strong> Groemminger,<br />
1993; Sturm, 1997). Alertness is the most basic form <strong>of</strong> attention <strong>and</strong> is intrinsically dependent on<br />
the general level <strong>of</strong> arousal. Selective attention describes the ability to focus on relevant stimulus<br />
information while nonrelevant features are neglected; divided attention describes the ability to concomitantly<br />
process several stimuli from different sensory modalities. Vigilance refers to the sustenance<br />
<strong>of</strong> attention over longer periods <strong>of</strong> time. Since the critical stimuli typically occur only rarely
Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in the Central Nervous System 291<br />
in time, vigilance can be seen as a counterforce against increasing fatigue in boring situations, which<br />
is crucial in everyday life, in situations such as long-distance driving (particularly at night), working<br />
in assembly lines, or monitoring a radar screen (e.g., in air traffic control).<br />
In a pioneering study, Warm et al. (1991) investigated the influence <strong>of</strong> peppermint <strong>and</strong> muguet<br />
odors on human visual vigilance. Peppermint, which was rated as stimulant, was expected to<br />
increase the task performance, whereas muguet, rated as relaxant, was expected to impair it. After<br />
intermittent inhalation, none <strong>of</strong> these fragrances increased processing speed in the task, but subjects<br />
in both odorant conditions detected more targets than a control group receiving unscented air.<br />
On the other h<strong>and</strong>, neither fragrance influenced subjective mood or judgments <strong>of</strong> workload. Gould<br />
<strong>and</strong> Martin (2001) studied the effects <strong>of</strong> bergamot <strong>and</strong> peppermint EOs on human sustained attention,<br />
where again peppermint was expected to improve performance, whereas bergamot, characterized<br />
as relaxing by an independent sample <strong>of</strong> subjects, was expected to have a deteriorating<br />
effect on vigilance performance. However, only bergamot had a significant influence in the anticipated<br />
direction, that is, subjects in this condition detected fewer targets than subjects in the peppermint<br />
or a no-odor control condition, which was probably related to subjects’ expectation <strong>of</strong> a<br />
relaxing effect.<br />
The influence <strong>of</strong> the inhalation <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> EOs, which were expected to have activating<br />
effects on performance in an alertness task, was assessed by Ilmberger et al. (2001). Contrary to the<br />
authors’ hypotheses, the results suggested that these EOs, when compared to an odorless control did<br />
not increase the speed <strong>of</strong> information processing. Even more unexpected, motor learning was<br />
impaired in the groups that received EOs; this effect is likely a consequence <strong>of</strong> distraction induced<br />
by the strong odor stimuli, an explanation that was supported by the reaction times that tended to be<br />
higher in the EO-treated groups than in the corresponding control groups. Alternatively, these<br />
authors argued that a ceiling effect might be responsible for the observed effects. Given that healthy<br />
subjects with intact attentional systems already perform at optimal levels <strong>of</strong> information processing<br />
in such basic tasks, it seems likely that activating EOs cannot enhance performance any further.<br />
Similarly, performance <strong>of</strong> healthy subjects may be too robust to be influenced by deactivating fragrances.<br />
This hypothesis has been supported by investigations on the EO <strong>of</strong> peppermint (Ho <strong>and</strong><br />
Spence, 2005), lavender, <strong>and</strong> rosemary (Moss et al., 2003). These fragrances rather affected performance<br />
in difficult tasks or in tasks testing higher cognitive functions than in simple ones testing<br />
basic functions. Another interesting finding <strong>of</strong> the study <strong>of</strong> Ilmberger et al. was that changes in<br />
performance were correlated with subjective ratings <strong>of</strong> characteristic odor properties, particularly<br />
with pleasantness <strong>and</strong> efficiency. Similar results were obtained in another study for the EO <strong>of</strong> peppermint<br />
(Sullivan et al., 1998), which showed that in a vigilance task subjects benefited most from<br />
the effects <strong>of</strong> this fragrance when they experienced the task as quite difficult <strong>and</strong> thought that the<br />
EO had a stimulant effect. In addition, the study <strong>of</strong> Ilmberger <strong>and</strong> co-workers clearly demonstrated<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> expectation, that is, a placebo effect, as correlations between individual task performance<br />
<strong>and</strong> odor ratings were not only revealed in the EO groups but also in the no-odor control groups. The<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> a pleasant <strong>and</strong> an unpleasant blend <strong>of</strong> fragrances on selective attention was studied by<br />
Gilbert et al. (1997). No influence <strong>of</strong> either fragrance blend was found on attentional performance,<br />
but the authors observed a sex-specific effect <strong>of</strong> suggesting the presence <strong>of</strong> ambient odors. In the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> a pleasant or no odor in the testing room, male subjects performed better when they<br />
were led to believe that no odor was present. Female subjects, however, performed better when they<br />
thought that they were exposed to an odorant under the same conditions. No such interaction was<br />
found in the unpleasant fragrance condition. These data again emphasize that, in addition to hedonic<br />
preferences, expectation <strong>of</strong> an effect may crucially influence the effects <strong>of</strong> odorants on human<br />
performance <strong>and</strong> that these factors may affect women <strong>and</strong> men differently.<br />
Millot et al. (2002) evaluated the influence <strong>of</strong> pleasant (lavender oil) <strong>and</strong> unpleasant (pyridine,<br />
11) ambient odors on performance in a visual or auditory alertness task, <strong>and</strong> in a divided attention<br />
task. The results showed that in the alertness task, irrespective <strong>of</strong> the tested modality, both fragrances<br />
independent <strong>of</strong> their hedonic valence improved performance by shortening reaction times compared
292 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
to an unscented control condition. However, none <strong>of</strong> the odorants exerted any influence on performance<br />
in the selective attention task in which subjects had to attend to auditory stimuli while neglecting<br />
visual ones. The authors conclude that pleasant odors enhance task performance by decreasing<br />
subjective feelings <strong>of</strong> stress, that is, by reducing overarousal, while unpleasant fragrances increase<br />
activation from suboptimal to optimal levels, thus having the same beneficial effects on cognitive<br />
performance. With this explanation the authors, however, presume that subjects in their experimental<br />
groups started from dissimilar arousal levels which seems rather unlikely given that subjects were<br />
assigned to these groups at r<strong>and</strong>om. Moreover, cognitive performance should be affected by alterations<br />
<strong>of</strong> the arousal level more readily with increasing task difficulty. Thus, the interpretation given<br />
by the authors does not thoroughly explain why reaction times were influenced by the odorants in<br />
the simple alertness task but not in the more sophisticated selective attention task.<br />
Degel <strong>and</strong> Köster (1999) exposed healthy subjects to either lavender, jasmine, or no fragrance<br />
with subjects being unaware <strong>of</strong> the odorants. Subjects had to perform a mathematical test, a letter<br />
counting (i.e., selective attention) task, <strong>and</strong> a creativity test. The authors expected a negative effect<br />
on performance <strong>of</strong> lavender <strong>and</strong> a positive effect <strong>of</strong> jasmine. The results, however, showed that lavender<br />
decreased the error rate in the selective attention task, whereas jasmine increased the number<br />
<strong>of</strong> errors in the mathematical test. Ratings <strong>of</strong> odor valence collected after testing demonstrated that<br />
lavender was judged more pleasant than jasmine, independent <strong>of</strong> which odor had been presented<br />
during the testing. Although subjects did not know that a fragrance had been administered, implicit<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> odor pleasantness has probably influenced their performance. This relation is supported<br />
by the fact that subjects who were not able to correctly identify the odors preferentially<br />
associated pictures <strong>of</strong> the room they had been tested in with the odor that had been present during<br />
the testing. Improvement <strong>of</strong> performance as a result <strong>of</strong> the inhalation <strong>of</strong> lavender EO has also been<br />
reported in another investigation (Sakamoto et al., 2005). In this study, subjects were exposed to<br />
lavender, jasmine or no aroma during phases <strong>of</strong> rest in-between sessions in which they completed a<br />
visual vigilance task involving tracking <strong>of</strong> a moving target. In the penultimate <strong>of</strong> five sessions, when<br />
fatigue was highest <strong>and</strong> arousal lowest as estimated from the decrement in performance between<br />
sessions <strong>of</strong> the control group, tracking speed increased <strong>and</strong> tracking error decreased in the lavender<br />
group when compared to the no-aroma group. Jasmine had no effect on task performance. The<br />
authors argued that lavender aroma may have decreased arousal during the resting period <strong>and</strong> hence<br />
helped to achieve optimal levels for the following task period. Since no secondary variables indicative<br />
<strong>of</strong> arousal or <strong>of</strong> subjective evaluation <strong>of</strong> aroma quality were assessed in this investigation, no<br />
inferences can be made on the mechanisms underlying the observed effects. Diego et al. (1998) in<br />
the aforementioned investigation studied the influence <strong>of</strong> lavender <strong>and</strong> rosemary EOs after a 3-min<br />
inhalation period on a mathematical task. In contrast to the authors’ expectations, both odorants<br />
positively affected performance by increasing calculation speed, although only lavender improved<br />
calculation accuracy. In addition, subjects in both fragrance groups reported to be more relaxed.<br />
Those in the lavender group had less depressed mood, whereas those in the rosemary group felt<br />
more alert <strong>and</strong> had lower state anxiety scores. These findings were interpreted as indicating overarousal<br />
caused by rosemary EO, which led to an increase <strong>of</strong> calculation speed at the cost <strong>of</strong> accuracy.<br />
In contrast, lavender EO seemed to have reduced the subjects’ arousal level <strong>and</strong> thus led to<br />
better performance than rosemary EO. However, since subjects in both fragrance groups felt more<br />
relaxed—but obviously only the lavender group benefited from this increase in relaxation—this is<br />
a somewhat unsatisfying explanation for the observed results.<br />
Evidence for the influence <strong>of</strong> physico-chemical odorant properties on visual information processing<br />
was supplied by Michael et al. (2005). These authors found that the exposure to both allyl<br />
isothiocyanate (AIC, 12), a mixed olfactory/trigeminal stimulus, <strong>and</strong> 2-phenyl ethyl alcohol<br />
(2-PEA, 13), a pure olfactory stimulant, impaired performance in a highly dem<strong>and</strong>ing visual attention<br />
task involving reaction to a target stimulus when a distractor appeared at different intervals<br />
after presentation <strong>of</strong> the target, although different mechanisms were responsible for these effects. In<br />
trials without a distractor, only 2-PEA (13) significantly increased the reaction times <strong>of</strong> healthy
Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in the Central Nervous System 293<br />
subjects; in trials with a distractor, subjects reacted more slowly in both odor conditions as compared<br />
to the no-odor control condition. However, AIC impaired performance, independent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
interval between distractor <strong>and</strong> target, whereas 2-PEA (13) only had a negative effect when the<br />
interval between target <strong>and</strong> distractor was short. While 2-PEA (13) seemed to have led to performance<br />
decrements by decreasing subjects’ arousal level, AIC as a strong trigeminal irritant seemed<br />
to have affected the shift <strong>of</strong> attention toward the distractor stimuli, so that they were considered<br />
more important than in the other conditions.<br />
Differences in effectiveness <strong>of</strong> fragrances as a function <strong>of</strong> the route <strong>of</strong> administration were<br />
explored by Heuberger et al. (2008). In several experiments, these authors investigated the influence<br />
<strong>of</strong> two monoterpenes, that is, 1,8-cineole (2) <strong>and</strong> (±)-linalool (3), on performance in a visual sustained<br />
attention task after 20 min inhalation <strong>and</strong> dermal application, respectively. 1,8-cineole (2)<br />
was expected to induce activation <strong>and</strong> improve task performance whereas (±)-linalool (3) was considered<br />
sedating/relaxing thus impairing performance. Since one <strong>of</strong> the aims <strong>of</strong> the study was to<br />
assess fragrance effects that were not mediated by stimulation <strong>of</strong> the olfactory system, inhalation <strong>of</strong><br />
the odorants was prevented in the dermal application conditions. In each condition, subjects rated<br />
their mood <strong>and</strong> well-being. In addition, ratings <strong>of</strong> odor pleasantness, intensity, <strong>and</strong> effectiveness<br />
were assessed in the inhalation conditions. In regard to performance on the vigilance task, the results<br />
showed no difference between the fragrance groups compared to a control group, which had received<br />
odorless air. However, 1,8-cineole (2) increased feelings <strong>of</strong> relaxation <strong>and</strong> calmness whereas<br />
(±)- linalool (3) led to increased vigor <strong>and</strong> mood. In addition, individual performance was correlated<br />
to the pleasantness <strong>of</strong> the odor <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> expectations <strong>of</strong> its effect. In contrast, in the dermal application<br />
conditions, subjects having received 1,8-cineole (2) performed faster than those having received<br />
(±)-linalool (3). These findings were interpreted as indicating the involvement <strong>of</strong> different mechanisms<br />
after inhalation <strong>and</strong> nonolfactory administration <strong>of</strong> fragrances. It seems that psychological<br />
effects are predominant when fragrances are applied by means <strong>of</strong> inhalation, that is, when the sense<br />
<strong>of</strong> smell is stimulated. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, pharmacological effects <strong>of</strong> odorants that might be overridden<br />
when fragrances are inhaled are evident when processing <strong>of</strong> odor information is prevented.<br />
10.1.4.2 Learning <strong>and</strong> Memory<br />
Effects <strong>of</strong> EOs <strong>and</strong> fragrances on memory functions <strong>and</strong> learning have less frequently been explored<br />
than influences on more basic cognitive functions. While learning can briefly be defined as “a process<br />
through which experience produces a lasting change in behavior or mental processes” (Zimbardo<br />
et al., 2003, p. 206), memory is a cognitive system composed <strong>of</strong> three separate subsystems or stages<br />
that cooperate closely to encode, store, <strong>and</strong> retrieve information. Sensory memory constitutes the<br />
first <strong>of</strong> the three memory stages <strong>and</strong> is responsible for briefly retaining sensory information. The<br />
second stage, working memory, transitorily preserves recent events <strong>and</strong> experiences. Long-term<br />
memory, the third subsystem, has the highest capacity <strong>of</strong> all stages <strong>and</strong> stores information based on<br />
meaning associated with the information (Zimbardo et al., 2003). A basic form <strong>of</strong> learning, which<br />
has been identified as a potent mediator <strong>of</strong> fragrance effects in humans (Jellinek, 1997), is conditioning,<br />
that is, the (conscious or unconscious) association <strong>of</strong> a stimulus with a specific response or<br />
behavior. For instance, Epple <strong>and</strong> Herz (1999) demonstrated that children who were exposed to an<br />
odorant during the performance <strong>of</strong> an insolvable task performed worse on other, solvable tasks<br />
when the same odorant was presented again. In contrast, no such impairment was observed when no<br />
odor or a different odor was presented. These results were interpreted as demonstrating negative<br />
olfactory conditioning. Along the same lines, Chu (2008) was able to show positive olfactory conditioning.<br />
In his study, children successfully performed a cognitive task, which they believed was<br />
insolvable in the presence <strong>of</strong> an ambient odor. When they were re-exposed to the same odorant,<br />
performance on other tasks improved significantly in comparison to another group <strong>of</strong> children who<br />
received a different odor. Since the children in Chu’s investigation were described in school reports<br />
as underachieving <strong>and</strong> lacking self-confidence, one might speculate that only children with these<br />
specific attributes benefit the influence <strong>of</strong> fragrances. This seems to be confirmed by the study <strong>of</strong>
294 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Kerl (1997), who found that, in general, ambient odors <strong>of</strong> lavender <strong>and</strong> jasmine did not improve<br />
memory functions in school children. However, lavender tended to increase performance in the<br />
memory task in children with high anxiety levels, which may have been consequent to the stressrelieving<br />
properties <strong>of</strong> lavender. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, jasmine impaired performance in lethargic<br />
children <strong>and</strong> this impairment in performance was negatively correlated with the children’s rating <strong>of</strong><br />
the odor. This result might indicate that lethargic children were distracted by the presence <strong>of</strong> an<br />
odorant they liked.<br />
Several studies examined the influence <strong>of</strong> EOs on a number <strong>of</strong> memory-related variables in<br />
adults (Moss et al., 2003, 2008; Tildesley et al., 2005). These authors reported that lavender reduced<br />
the quality <strong>of</strong> memory <strong>and</strong> rosemary increased it, while both EOs reduced the speed <strong>of</strong> memory<br />
when compared to a no-odor control condition. At the same time, rosemary increased alertness in<br />
comparison to both the control <strong>and</strong> the lavender group, but exposure to the odorants led to higher<br />
contentedness than no scent. Similarly, peppermint enhanced memory quality while ylang-ylang<br />
impaired it <strong>and</strong> reduced processing speed. Ratings <strong>of</strong> mood showed that peppermint increased alertness<br />
while ylang-ylang decreased it <strong>and</strong> increased subjective calmness. In a third experiment, oral<br />
administration <strong>of</strong> Spanish sage [Salvia lav<strong>and</strong>ulifolia Vahl (Lamiaceae)] improved both quality <strong>and</strong><br />
speed <strong>of</strong> memory, <strong>and</strong> increased subjective ratings <strong>of</strong> alertness, calmness, <strong>and</strong> contentedness. The<br />
beneficial influence <strong>of</strong> an odorant being present in the learning phase on successive retrieval <strong>of</strong><br />
information was shown by Morgan (1996). In this study, subjects were exposed or not exposed to a<br />
fragrance during the encoding <strong>of</strong> words unrelated to odor. Recall <strong>of</strong> the learned material was tested<br />
in three unannounced sessions 15 min apart, as well as 5 days after the learning phase. The results<br />
showed that performance in those groups that had not been exposed to an odorant in the learning<br />
phase declined continuously over time whereas it remained stable in those groups that had learned<br />
with ambient odor present. In addition, subjects who had learned under odor exposure performed<br />
significantly better when the odor was present during recall than those who had not received an<br />
odorant during the learning phase. These findings show that odorants in the encoding phase may<br />
serve as cues for later recall <strong>of</strong> the stored information. Recently, similar results have been reported<br />
in subjects who were presented with odorants while asleep (Rasch et al., 2007) demonstrating that<br />
fragrances may prompt memory consolidation during sleep. According to a study by Walla et al.<br />
(2002), it seems to be crucial whether an odorant in the encoding phase <strong>of</strong> a mnemonic task is consciously<br />
perceived <strong>and</strong> processed. These authors found differences in brain activation in a word<br />
recognition task as a function <strong>of</strong> conscious versus unconscious olfactory processing in the encoding<br />
phase. In other words, when odorants were presented during the learning phase <strong>and</strong> consciously<br />
perceived word recognition was more likely negatively affected than when the odor was not consciously<br />
processed. In addition, the same group <strong>of</strong> researchers demonstrated that word recognition<br />
performance was significantly poorer when the odorants were presented simultaneously with the<br />
words as opposed to continuously during the encoding phase, <strong>and</strong> when semantic (deep) as opposed<br />
to nonsemantic (shallow) encoding was required. These effects can be explained by a competition<br />
<strong>of</strong> processing resources in brain areas engaged in both language <strong>and</strong> odor processing (Walla et al.,<br />
2003). Similar results were also observed in an experiment involving the encoding <strong>of</strong> faces with <strong>and</strong><br />
without odorants present in the learning phase (Walla et al. 2003). Again, recognition accuracy was<br />
impaired when an odor was simultaneously presented during encoding.<br />
As discussed above, subjective experience <strong>of</strong> valence seems to modulate the influence <strong>of</strong><br />
fragrances on cognition. For instance, Danuser et al. (2003) found no effects <strong>of</strong> pleasant olfactory<br />
stimuli on short-term memory whereas unpleasant odorants reduced the performance <strong>of</strong> healthy<br />
subjects, probably by distracting them. Habel et al. (2007) studied the effect <strong>of</strong> neutral <strong>and</strong> unpleasant<br />
olfactory stimulation on the performance <strong>of</strong> a working memory task <strong>and</strong> found that malodors<br />
significantly deteriorated working memory in only about half <strong>of</strong> the subjects. It was also shown that<br />
subjects in the affected group differed significantly in brain activation patterns from those in the<br />
unaffected group, that is, the latter showing stronger activation in fronto-parieto-cerebellar networks<br />
associated with working memory. In contrast, subjects whose performance was impaired by
Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in the Central Nervous System 295<br />
the unpleasant odor showed greater activation in areas associated with emotional processing, such<br />
as the temporal <strong>and</strong> medial frontal cortex. The authors concluded that individual differences exist<br />
for the influence <strong>of</strong> fragrances on working memory <strong>and</strong> that unaffected subjects were better able to<br />
counteract the detrimental effect <strong>of</strong> unpleasant odor stimuli.<br />
Leppanen <strong>and</strong> Hietanen (2003) tested the recognition speed <strong>of</strong> happy <strong>and</strong> disgusted facial expressions<br />
when pleasant or unpleasant odorants were presented during the recognition task. This study<br />
showed that pleasant olfactory stimuli had no particular influence on the speed <strong>of</strong> recognition <strong>of</strong><br />
emotional facial expressions, that is, happy faces were recognized faster than disgusted faces. This<br />
result was also observed when no odorant was administered. In the unpleasant condition, however,<br />
the advantage for recognizing happy faces disappeared. These findings were interpreted as evidence<br />
for the modulation <strong>of</strong> emotion-related brain structures that form the perceptual representation <strong>of</strong><br />
facial expressions by unpleasant odorants. Walla et al. (2005) supplied evidence that performance<br />
in a face recognition task was only affected when conscious odor processing took place In this<br />
study, two olfactory stimuli, that is, 2-PEA (13) <strong>and</strong> dihydrogen sulfide (H 2 S), a trigeminal stimulus,<br />
that is, carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), <strong>and</strong> no odor were presented briefly <strong>and</strong> simultaneously to the presentation<br />
<strong>of</strong> faces. The results showed that the pure odorants irrespective <strong>of</strong> their valence improved<br />
recognition performance whereas CO 2 decreased it, <strong>and</strong> only CO 2 , which is associated with painful<br />
sensations, was processed consciously by the participants <strong>of</strong> this investigation.<br />
With regard to the content <strong>of</strong> memory, some researchers have claimed a special relationship<br />
between autobiographical, that is, personally meaningful episodic, memories <strong>and</strong> fragrances. As a<br />
result <strong>of</strong> this special link, it has been observed that memories evoked by olfactory cues are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
older, more vivid, more detailed, <strong>and</strong> more affectively toned than those cued by other sensory<br />
stimuli (Chu <strong>and</strong> Downes, 2002; Goddard et al., 2005; Will<strong>and</strong>er <strong>and</strong> Larsson, 2007). This phenomenon<br />
has been explained by the peculiar neuroanatomical connection <strong>of</strong> the memory systems with<br />
the emotional systems. Evidence for this hypothesis has for instance been supplied by the group <strong>of</strong><br />
Herz (Herz <strong>and</strong> Cupchik, 1995; Herz, 2004; Herz et al., 2004), who demonstrated that presentation<br />
<strong>of</strong> odorants resulted in more emotional memories than presentation <strong>of</strong> the same cue in auditory or<br />
visual form. The authors also showed that if the odor cue was hedonically congruent with the item<br />
that had to be remembered, memory for associated emotional experience improved. Moreover,<br />
personally salient fragrance cues were associated with higher functional activity in emotion-related<br />
brain regions, such as the amygdala <strong>and</strong> the hippocampus.<br />
10.1.4.3 Other Cognitive Tasks<br />
The study <strong>of</strong> Degel <strong>and</strong> Köster (1999) described earlier showed that under certain conditions odorants<br />
may influence attentional performance even without subjects being aware <strong>of</strong> their presence.<br />
According to an investigation by Holl<strong>and</strong> et al. (2005) the unnoticed presence <strong>of</strong> odorants may also<br />
affect everyday behavior <strong>and</strong> higher cognitive functions. The authors reported that subliminal concentrations<br />
<strong>of</strong> a citrus-scented cleaning product increased identification <strong>of</strong> cleaning-related words in<br />
a lexical decision task. Moreover, subjects exposed to the subliminal odor listed cleaning-related<br />
activities more frequently when asked to describe planned activities during the day <strong>and</strong> kept their<br />
environment tidier during an eating task.<br />
The effects <strong>of</strong> pleasant suprathreshold fragrances on other higher cognitive functions were, for<br />
instance, investigated by Baron (1990). In this study, subjects were exposed to pleasant or neutral<br />
ambient odors while solving a clerical coding task <strong>and</strong> negotiating about monetary issues with a<br />
fellow participant. Before performing these tasks subjects indicated self-set goals <strong>and</strong> self-efficacy.<br />
Following the tasks subjects rated the experimental rooms in terms <strong>of</strong> pleasantness <strong>and</strong> comfort,<br />
as well as their mood. In addition, they were asked which conflict management strategies they<br />
would adopt in the future. Although neither fragrance had a direct effect on performance in the<br />
clerical task, subjects in the pleasant odor condition set higher goals <strong>and</strong> adopted a more efficient<br />
strategy in the task than those in the neutral odor condition. In addition, male subjects in the<br />
pleasant odor condition rated themselves as more efficient than those in the neutral odor condition.
296 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
In the negotiation task, subjects in the pleasant odor condition set higher monetary goals <strong>and</strong> made<br />
more concessions than those in the neutral odor condition. Moreover, subjects in the pleasant odor<br />
condition were in better mood <strong>and</strong> reported planning to h<strong>and</strong>le future conflicts less <strong>of</strong>ten through<br />
confrontation <strong>and</strong> avoidance. Thus, this study showed that pleasant ambient fragrances <strong>of</strong>fer a<br />
potential to create a more comfortable work environment <strong>and</strong> diminish aggressive behavior in<br />
situations involving competition. Gilbert et al. (1997) examined the effect <strong>of</strong> a pleasant <strong>and</strong> an<br />
unpleasant blend <strong>of</strong> fragrances on the same clerical coding task but were not able to show any<br />
influence <strong>of</strong> either fragrance on task performance. However, subjects exposed to unpleasant odorants<br />
believed that these odorants had negative effects on their performance in simple <strong>and</strong> difficult<br />
mathematical <strong>and</strong> verbal tasks (Knasko, 1993).<br />
Finally, Ludvigson <strong>and</strong> Rottman (1989), studying the influence <strong>of</strong> lavender <strong>and</strong> clove EOs in<br />
ambient air in comparison to a no-odor control condition, found that lavender impaired performance<br />
in a mathematical reasoning task, while clove was devoid <strong>of</strong> effects. However, the lavender<br />
effect was only observed in the first <strong>of</strong> two sessions held one week apart. Also, subjects in the<br />
lavender condition rated the experimental conditions more favorably, while clove odor decreased<br />
subjects’ willingness to return to the second session. Moreover, subjects who were exposed to an<br />
odor in one <strong>of</strong> the two sessions were generally less willing to return <strong>and</strong> had worse mood than subjects<br />
who never received an odor. To further complicate things, these odorant by session interactions<br />
were related to personality factors in a highly complex manner.<br />
10.1.5 CONCLUSIONS<br />
The presented review <strong>of</strong> the literature on the effects <strong>of</strong> EOs <strong>and</strong> fragrances on human arousal <strong>and</strong><br />
cognition demonstrates that coherent findings are quite scarce <strong>and</strong> that we are still far from painting<br />
a detailed picture <strong>of</strong> which effects can be achieved by administering a particular EO <strong>and</strong> how these<br />
effects are precisely exerted. One reason for the inconsistency in results may be that in most studies<br />
in humans clear associations between constituents <strong>of</strong> EOs <strong>and</strong> observed effects are missing. While<br />
exact specifications about the origin, composition, <strong>and</strong> concentration <strong>of</strong> the tested oils would be<br />
necessary to establish clear pharmacological pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>and</strong> dose response curves for specific oils, in<br />
many investigations no such details are given. This renders attempts to compare the results from<br />
different studies <strong>and</strong> to generalize findings rather difficult.<br />
Another aspect that clearly contributes to inconclusive findings is the involvement <strong>of</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong><br />
mechanisms <strong>of</strong> action in the effects <strong>of</strong> EOs on human arousal <strong>and</strong> cognition. In a very valuable<br />
review on the assessment <strong>of</strong> olfactory processes with electrophysiological techniques, Lorig (2000)<br />
points out that EEG changes induced by odorants have to be interpreted with great care, since other<br />
direct odor effects may be responsible for changes, particularly when relaxing effects reflected by<br />
the induction <strong>of</strong> slow-wave activity are concerned. Physiological processes, such as altered breathing<br />
patterns in response to pleasant versus unpleasant odors, cognitive factors, for example, as a consequence<br />
<strong>of</strong> expectancy or the processing <strong>of</strong> secondary stimulus features, or an inappropriate baseline<br />
condition can lead to changes <strong>of</strong> the EEG pattern, which are quite unrelated to any psychoactive<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> the tested odorant. Well-designed paradigms are thus necessary to control for cognitive<br />
influences that might mask substance-specific effects <strong>of</strong> fragrances. Also, while EEG <strong>and</strong> other<br />
electrophysiological techniques are highly efficient to elucidate fragrance effects on the CNS in the<br />
time domain, we know only little about spatial aspects <strong>of</strong> such effects. Brain imaging techniques,<br />
such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), will prove valuable to address this issue.<br />
Using fMRI, preliminary results from the author’s group (Friedl et al., 2007) have shown that, after<br />
prolonged exposure, fragrances alter neuronal activity in distinct regions <strong>of</strong> the brain in a timedependent<br />
manner <strong>and</strong> that this influence is sex specific.<br />
When evaluating psychoactive effects <strong>of</strong> EOs <strong>and</strong> fragrances on human cognitive functions, the<br />
results should be interpreted just as cautiously as those <strong>of</strong> electrophysiological studies as similar<br />
confounding factors, ranging from influences <strong>of</strong> stimulus-related features, for example, pleasantness,
Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in the Central Nervous System 297<br />
to expectation <strong>of</strong> fragrance effects <strong>and</strong> even personality traits, may be influencing the observed<br />
outcome. In regard to higher cognitive functioning, such as language or emotional processing, conscious<br />
as opposed to sub- or unconscious processing <strong>of</strong> odor information seems to differentially<br />
affect performance due to differences in the utilization <strong>of</strong> shared neuronal resources. Again, it<br />
seems worthwhile to measure additional parameters that are indicative <strong>of</strong> (subjective) stimulus<br />
information processing <strong>and</strong> emotional arousal if hypotheses are being built on direct (pharmacological)<br />
<strong>and</strong> cognitively mediated (psychological) odor effects on human behavior. Moreover, comparisons<br />
<strong>of</strong> different forms <strong>of</strong> application that involve or exclude stimulation <strong>of</strong> the olfactory system,<br />
such as inhalative versus noninhalative, dermal administration, have proven useful in the distinction<br />
<strong>of</strong> pharmacological from psychological mechanisms <strong>and</strong> will serve to enlarge our underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong><br />
psychoactive effects <strong>of</strong> EO <strong>and</strong> fragrances in humans.<br />
10.2 PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY OF ESSENTIAL OILS<br />
Domingos Sávio Nunes, Viviane de Moura Linck, Adriana Lourenço da Silva,<br />
Micheli Figueiró, <strong>and</strong> Elaine Elisabetsky<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> aromas goes back to ancient times, as implied by the nearly 200 references in the Bible<br />
relating the use <strong>of</strong> aromas for “mental, spiritual, <strong>and</strong> physical healing” (Perry <strong>and</strong> Perry, 2006). It is<br />
currently accepted that aromas <strong>and</strong> some <strong>of</strong> its individual components may in fact possess pharmacological<br />
<strong>and</strong>/or psychological properties, <strong>and</strong> in many instances the overall effect is likely to result<br />
from a combination <strong>of</strong> both. The following sections review the psychopharmacology <strong>of</strong> EOs <strong>and</strong>/or<br />
its individual components, as well as its mechanisms <strong>of</strong> action.<br />
10.2.1 AROMATIC PLANTS USED IN TRADITIONAL MEDICAL SYSTEMS<br />
AS SEDATIVES OR STIMULANTS<br />
EOs are generally products <strong>of</strong> rather complex compositions used contemporaneously in aromatherapy,<br />
<strong>and</strong> for centuries as aromatic medicinal plant species in traditional systems <strong>of</strong> medicine.<br />
Aromatic formulas are used for the treatment <strong>of</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> illnesses, including those that affect the<br />
CNS (Almeida et al., 2004). Volatile compounds presenting sedative or stimulatory properties have<br />
been <strong>and</strong> continue to be identified in EOs from aromatic medicinal species spread across different<br />
families <strong>and</strong> genera. The majority <strong>of</strong> these substances have small structures with less than 12 carbons<br />
<strong>and</strong> present low polarity chemical functions, being therefore quite volatile. Since most natural<br />
EOs are formed by complex mixtures, their bioactivity(ies) are obviously dependent on the contribution<br />
<strong>of</strong> their various components. Therefore, studies failing to characterize at least the main components<br />
<strong>of</strong> the EO studied are not discussed in this chapter.<br />
Several Citrus EOs contain high proportions <strong>of</strong> limonene (14) as its major component. Orange<br />
peels are used as sedative in several countries, <strong>and</strong> EOs obtained from Citrus aurantium L. (Rutaceae)<br />
fruit peels can contain as much as 97.8% <strong>of</strong> limonene (14). The anxiolytic <strong>and</strong> sedative properties <strong>of</strong><br />
Citrus EO suggested by traditional uses have been assessed in mice (Carvalho-Freitas <strong>and</strong> Costa,<br />
2002; Pultrini et al., 2006) <strong>and</strong> also shown in a clinical setting (Lehrner et al., 2000). The relaxant<br />
effects observed in female patients in a dental <strong>of</strong>fice were produced with a Citrus sinensis (L.)<br />
Osbeck (Rutaceae) EO composed <strong>of</strong> 88.1% limonene (14) <strong>and</strong> 3.77% myrcene (15).<br />
The common <strong>and</strong> large variability in the composition <strong>of</strong> natural EOs poses difficulties for the<br />
evaluation <strong>and</strong> the safe <strong>and</strong> effective use <strong>of</strong> aromatic medicinal plants. Genetic variations led to the<br />
occurrence <strong>of</strong> chemotypes, as in the case <strong>of</strong> Lippia alba (P. Mill.) N.E. Br. ex Britt. & Wilson<br />
(Verbenaceae). Analyses revealed three monoterpenic chemotypes characterized by the prevalence<br />
<strong>of</strong> myrcene (15) <strong>and</strong> citral (16) in chemotype I, limonene (14) <strong>and</strong> citral (16) in chemotype II, <strong>and</strong><br />
limonene (14) <strong>and</strong> carvone (17) in chemotype III (Matos, 1996). This species is known in Brazil as<br />
“cidreira”; the aromatic tea from its leaves is traditionally used as a tranquilizer being one <strong>of</strong> the
298 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
most widely known home-made remedies. Pharmacological assays showed anxiolytic (Vale et al.,<br />
1999) <strong>and</strong> anticonvulsant (Viana et al., 2000) effects <strong>of</strong> EO samples from all three chemotypes.<br />
Anticonvulsive <strong>and</strong> sedative effects in mice were also demonstrated for the three isolated principal<br />
constituents <strong>of</strong> Lippia alba oils: limonene (14), myrcene (15), <strong>and</strong> citral (16) (Vale et al., 2002).<br />
Various Ocimum species are used traditionally for sedative <strong>and</strong> anticonvulsive purposes, <strong>and</strong> its<br />
EOs seem to play an important role for these properties. However, besides the normal variability in<br />
the composition <strong>of</strong> the EOs, the occurrence <strong>of</strong> chemotypes seems to be generalized in this genus<br />
(Grayer et al., 1996; Vieira et al., 2001). The comparison <strong>of</strong> EO samples from different accessions<br />
<strong>of</strong> Ocimum basilicum L. (Lamiaceae) pointed to the occurrence <strong>of</strong> linalool (3) <strong>and</strong> methylchavicol<br />
(18) types, <strong>and</strong> it has been suggested that such data should be taken into account for an intraspecific<br />
classification <strong>of</strong> the taxon (Grayer et al., 1996). An EO <strong>of</strong> O. basilicum L. <strong>of</strong> the linalool-type containing<br />
44.18% linalool (3), 13.65% 1,8-cineole (2), <strong>and</strong> 8.59% eugenol (4) as main constituents<br />
presented anticonvulsant <strong>and</strong> hypnotic activities (Ismail, 2006). There are two varieties <strong>of</strong> Ocimum<br />
gratissimum L. (Lamiaceae) (O. gratissimum L. var. gratissimum <strong>and</strong> O. gratissimum var. macrophyllum<br />
Briq.) that form a polymorphic complex very difficult to differentiate by morphological<br />
traits (Vieira et al., 2001). It was clearly demonstrated that the genetic variations <strong>of</strong> O. gratissimum<br />
led to three different chemotypes (Vieira et al., 2001): eugenol (4), thymol (19), <strong>and</strong> geraniol (20).<br />
EOs obtained from O. gratissimum <strong>of</strong> the eugenol-type collected during the 4 year seasons contained<br />
eugenol (4) (44.89–56.10%) <strong>and</strong> 1,8-cineole (2) (16.83–33.67%) as main components, <strong>and</strong><br />
presented sedative <strong>and</strong> anticonvulsant activities slightly altered by the composition <strong>of</strong> each sample<br />
(Freire et al., 2006). A dose-dependent sedative effect was observed in mice <strong>and</strong> rats (Orafidiya et<br />
al., 2004) treated with O. gratissimum thymol-type EO containing 47.0% thymol (19), 16.2% p-cymene<br />
(21), <strong>and</strong> 6.2% a-terpinene (22) as major constituents.<br />
Among Amazonian traditional communities, a widespread recipe that includes Cissus sicyoides<br />
L. (Vitaceae), Aeolanthus suaveolens Mart. ex Spreng. (Lamiaceae), Ruta graveolens L. (Rutaceae),<br />
<strong>and</strong> Sesamum indicum L. (Pedaliaceae) was identified as the most frequently indicated for the management<br />
<strong>of</strong> epilepsy-like symptoms. The results <strong>of</strong> pharmacological studies on the traditional preparations<br />
<strong>and</strong> the EO obtained from Aeolanthus suaveolens <strong>and</strong> its principal components led to the<br />
suggestion that the volatile lactones could be interesting target compounds in the search for new<br />
anticonvulsant agents (de Souza et al., 1997). Linalool (3) was identified as one <strong>of</strong> the principal<br />
active components <strong>of</strong> the Aeolanthus suaveolens EO (Elisabetsky et al., 1995b), <strong>and</strong> proved to play<br />
a key role in the central activities <strong>of</strong> the traditional preparation (Elisabetsky et al., 1995b, 1999;<br />
Brum et al., 2001a, b). (R)-(–)-Linalool (7) is recognized today as the sedative <strong>and</strong> calming component<br />
<strong>of</strong> numerous traditional <strong>and</strong> commercial preparations or their isolated natural EOs (Sugawara<br />
et al., 1998; Heuberger et al., 2004; Kuroda et al., 2005; Shaw et al., 2007). Epinepetalactone (23) is<br />
a volatile apolar compound <strong>and</strong> major component in the EO from Nepeta sibthorpii Benth.<br />
(Lamiaceae) responsible for the EO anticonvulsant activity (Galati et al., 2004).<br />
Nature continues to reveal its inventiveness in combining different monoterpenes <strong>and</strong> arylpropenoids<br />
to achieve special nuances regarding central activities. An EO obtained from Artemisia<br />
dracunculus L. (Asteraceae) containing 21.1% trans-anethole (24), 20.6% a-trans-ocimene (25),<br />
12.4% limonene (14), 5.1% a-pinene (1), 4.8% allo-ocimene (26), <strong>and</strong> 2.2% methyleugenol (27)<br />
shows anticonvulsant activity likely to be assigned to a combination <strong>of</strong> these various monoterpenes<br />
(Sayyah et al., 2004). b-Asarone (28) <strong>and</strong> its isomers are recognized as important sedative <strong>and</strong><br />
anticonvulsive active components as in, for example, drugs based on Acorus species in which the<br />
total proportion <strong>of</strong> isomers can reach 90% (Koo et al., 2003; Mukherjee et al., 2007). In the EO<br />
from Acorus tatarinowii Schott (Acoraceae) rhizome, traditionally used for epilepsy, the combination<br />
<strong>of</strong> monoterpenes <strong>and</strong> arylpropenoids was found to be ~25% 1,8-cineole (2), ~12% linalool (3)<br />
<strong>and</strong> ~10% b-asarone (28), <strong>and</strong> isomers (Ye et al., 2006).<br />
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is known to use especially complex preparations, more<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten than not composed <strong>of</strong> several plant materials including therefore a number <strong>of</strong> active principles<br />
pertaining to different chemical classes. The TCM prescription SuHeXiang Wan combines different
Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in the Central Nervous System 299<br />
proportions <strong>of</strong> as much as 15 crude drugs <strong>and</strong> is used orally for the treatment <strong>of</strong> seizure, infantile<br />
convulsion, <strong>and</strong> other conditions affecting the CNS (Koo et al., 2004). The EO obtained by hexane<br />
extraction at room temperature from a SuHeXiang Wan composed <strong>of</strong> nine crude drugs proved to<br />
have a relatively simple composition: 21.4% borneol (29), 33.3% isoborneol (30), 5.9% eugenol (4),<br />
<strong>and</strong> other minor components (Koo et al., 2004). The inhalation <strong>of</strong> this volatile mixture delayed the<br />
appearance <strong>of</strong> pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced convulsions suggesting GABAergic modulation<br />
(Koo et al., 2004).<br />
Other monoterpenoid or arylpropenoid derivatives identified as the active components <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />
sedatives include: methyleugenol (27) (Norte et al., 2005), isopulegol (31) (Silva et al., 2007),<br />
<strong>and</strong> a-terpineol (32) (de Sousa et al., 2007). It is worth mentioning that the monoterpene thujone<br />
(33), the dangerous principle <strong>of</strong> the ancient Absinthii herba, Artemisia absinthium L. (Asteraceae),<br />
induces marked central stimulatory effects, especially when used in the form <strong>of</strong> liqueur. Frequent<br />
<strong>and</strong> excessive use <strong>of</strong> this drug can cause intoxicated states accompanied by clonic convulsions<br />
among other serious consequences (Bielenberg, 2007).<br />
Only a few volatile sesquiterpenes presenting important central activities are currently known.<br />
b-Eudesmol (34) was found to be one <strong>of</strong> the volatile active principles <strong>of</strong> the Chinese medicinal herb<br />
Atractylodes lancea DC. (Asteraceae) with alleged antagonist properties useful in intoxication by<br />
anticholinesterase agents <strong>of</strong> the organophosphorous type (Chiou et al., 1997). Experimental data<br />
show that b-eudesmol (34) prevents convulsions <strong>and</strong> lethality induced by electroshock but not those<br />
induced by PTZ or picrotoxin (Chiou et al., 1995). With a very similar chemical structure, a- eudesmol<br />
(35) protects the development <strong>of</strong> postischemic brain injury in rats by blocking v-Aga-IVA-sensitive<br />
Ca 2+ channels (Asakura et al., 2000).<br />
The sesquiterpenes caryophyllene oxide (36) <strong>and</strong> b-selinene (=b-eudesmene) (37) isolated from<br />
the hexane extract from leaves <strong>of</strong> Psidium guajava var. minor Mattos (Myrtaceae) potentiated<br />
pentobarbital sleep <strong>and</strong> increased the latency for PTZ-induced convulsions in mice; blockade <strong>of</strong><br />
extracellular Ca 2+ was observed in isolated guinea-pig ileum with the hexane extract <strong>and</strong> its fractions<br />
containing both sesquiterpenes (Meckes et al., 1997). The similarity between the chemical structures<br />
<strong>of</strong> the sesquiterpenes (34), (35), <strong>and</strong> (37) is noteworthy <strong>and</strong> could indicate relevant characteristic<br />
patterns required for central activity.<br />
10.2.2 EFFECTS OF EOS IN ANIMAL MODELS<br />
Pure compounds isolated from aromas <strong>and</strong> complex EOs have been proved to induce a variety <strong>of</strong><br />
effects on human <strong>and</strong> other mammalian species. Biological properties such as antispasmodic<br />
(Carvalho-Freitas et al., 2002) or other autonomic nervous system-related activities (Haze et al.,<br />
2002; Sadraei et al., 2003) are outside the scope <strong>of</strong> this chapter. Central effects have been extensively<br />
documented, <strong>and</strong> fall more <strong>of</strong>ten than not into the sedative (Buchbauer et al., 1991, 1993; Elisabetsky<br />
et al., 1995a; Lehrner et al., 2000), anxiolytic (Diego et al., 1998; Cooke <strong>and</strong> Ernst, 2000; Lehrner<br />
et al., 2000; Carvalho-Freitas et al., 2002), antidepressant (Komori et al., 1995a,b), <strong>and</strong> hypnotic<br />
(Diego et al., 1998) categories. As earlier stated, it is likely that the overall effects <strong>of</strong> EOs in humans<br />
results from a combination <strong>of</strong> physiological (in this case psychopharmacological) <strong>and</strong> psychological<br />
effects. Even when accepting the limitations <strong>of</strong> the validity <strong>of</strong> animal models in regard to assessing<br />
the effects <strong>of</strong> drugs on complex human emotional states, in the case <strong>of</strong> EOs the usefulness <strong>of</strong> experiments<br />
with rodent models is largely limited to clarify the physiological part <strong>of</strong> the potential effects in<br />
humans. Again, the reproducibility <strong>of</strong> the data compiled in this section would be highly dependent<br />
on the composition <strong>of</strong> EOs, unfortunately not always adequately reported.<br />
Relevant to the data that follows, it has been shown that individual components <strong>of</strong> EOs administered<br />
orally, by means <strong>of</strong> intraperitoneal or subcutaneous injections, dermally, or by inhalation do<br />
reach <strong>and</strong> adequately cross the blood brain barrier (Kovar et al., 1987; Jirovetz et al., 1990; Buchbauer<br />
et al., 1993; Fujiwara et al., 1998; Moreira et al., 2001; Perry et al., 2002). The question <strong>of</strong> whether<br />
psychopharmacological effects in animals are dependent on olfactory functions is surprisingly not
300 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
yet entirely clarified. Cedrol (from pine EO) was shown to be sedative in normal rats <strong>and</strong> rats made<br />
anosmic with zinc sulfate (Kagawa et al., 2003). In contrast, a mix <strong>of</strong> chamomile <strong>and</strong> lavender oils<br />
reduced pentobarbital-induced sleeping time in normal but not anosmic rats <strong>and</strong> mice (Kagawa<br />
et al., 2003).<br />
Rose <strong>and</strong> lavender oil, administrated intraperitoneally (i.p.) to mice, showed anticonflict effects<br />
(Umezu, 1999; Umezu et al., 2002), suggesting anxiolytic properties. Unequivocal anxiolytic properties<br />
were also demonstrated for lavender EO (i.p., gerbils) with the elevated plus maze test (Bradley<br />
et al., 2007a). Chen et al. (2004) reported that Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels (Apiaceae) EO (orally<br />
administrated, mice) also has anxiolytic effect in the elevated plus maze, the light/dark model, <strong>and</strong><br />
the stress-induced hyperthermia paradigms.<br />
The dry rhizomes <strong>of</strong> Acorus gramineus Sol<strong>and</strong> (Acoraceae) are <strong>of</strong>ficially listed in the Korean<br />
pharmacopoeia for sedative, digestive, analgesic, diuretic, <strong>and</strong> antifungal effects (Koo et al., 2003).<br />
Various CNS effects have been characterized for Acorus gramineus EO, including antagonism <strong>of</strong><br />
PTZ-induced convulsion, potentiation <strong>of</strong> pentobarbital-induced sleeping time, sedation, <strong>and</strong><br />
decreased spontaneous locomotion with the water <strong>and</strong> methanol extracts (mice, i.p.) (Vohora et al.,<br />
1990; Liao et al., 1998). Unexpectedly, given that sedative drugs usually impair cognition in animals,<br />
the oral administration <strong>of</strong> Acorus gramineus rhizoma EO, with eugenol (4) as the principal<br />
component, improved cognitive function in aged rats <strong>and</strong> mice; based on brain amine analyses, the<br />
authors suggest that such effects may be related to increased norepinephrine, dopamine, <strong>and</strong> serotonin<br />
relative levels, <strong>and</strong> to decreased activity <strong>of</strong> brain acetylcholinesterase (Zhang et al., 2007).<br />
Cymbopogon winterianus Jowitt (Poaceae), popularly known as “citronella” <strong>and</strong> “java grass,” is<br />
an important EO yielding aromatic grass, mostly cultivated in India <strong>and</strong> Brazil. Cymbopogon winterianus<br />
EO is rich in citronellal (38), geraniol (39), <strong>and</strong> citronellol (40) (Cassel <strong>and</strong> Vargas 2006),<br />
<strong>and</strong> has demonstrated anticonvulsant effects (i.p., mice) (Quintans-Júnior et al., 2007). Pharmacological<br />
studies with Cymbopogon citratus Stapf EO [presenting high percentage <strong>of</strong> citral (16) in<br />
its composition] revealed anxiolytic, hypnotic, <strong>and</strong> anticonvulsant properties when orally administrated<br />
to mice (Blanco et al., 2007).<br />
The EO <strong>of</strong> Eugenia caryophyllata Thunb (Myrtaceae), used in Iranian traditional medicine,<br />
exhibits anticonvulsant activity against tonic seizures induced by maximal electroshock (MES) (i.p.,<br />
mice) (Pourgholami et al., 1999a). The leaf EO <strong>of</strong> Laurus nobilis L. (Lauraceae), which has been<br />
used as an antiepileptic remedy in Iranian traditional medicine, demonstrated more anti convulsant<br />
activity against experimental seizures induced by PTZ (i.p., in mice) than MES-induced seizures.<br />
Components responsible for this effect may include methyleugenol, eugenol, <strong>and</strong> pinene present in<br />
the EO (Sayyah et al., 2002). In the same manner, EO obtained from fruits <strong>of</strong> Pimpinella anisum S.G.<br />
Gmel. (Umbelliferae) demonstrated anticonvulsant activity against seizures induced by PTZ or MES<br />
in mice (i.p.) (Pourgholami et al., 1999b). As mentioned earlier, since no chemical analysis is reported<br />
for the studied EOs one can only speculate on the components that may be responsible for the activities<br />
observed with E. caryophyllata, Laurus nobilis, <strong>and</strong> Pimpinella anisum.<br />
Various Thymus species <strong>of</strong> the Lamiaceae family (including Thymus fallax Fisch. & Mey.,<br />
Thymus kotschyanus Boiss. & Hohen., Thymus pubescens Boiss. & Kotschy ex Celak, Thymus<br />
vulgaris M. Bieb.), which are widely distributed as aromatic <strong>and</strong> medicinal plants in many regions<br />
<strong>of</strong> Iran, have shown CNS effects (Duke et al., 2002). Pharmacological studies in mice (i.p.) with<br />
Thymus fallax, Thymus kotschyanus, <strong>and</strong> Thymus pubescens containing, respectively, 30.2% <strong>of</strong><br />
carvacrol (41), 18.7% <strong>of</strong> pulegone (42), <strong>and</strong> 32.1% <strong>of</strong> carvacrol (41), demonstrated that the Thymus<br />
fallax EO has more antidepressant activity than Thymus kotschyanus <strong>and</strong> Thymus pubescens during<br />
the forced swimming test (Morteza-Semnani et al., 2007). These results illustrate that minor<br />
components <strong>of</strong> EOs can modify the activity <strong>of</strong> main components, reaffirming the importance <strong>of</strong><br />
chemically characterizing EOs in order to underst<strong>and</strong> its overall bioactivity.<br />
An EO fraction obtained from powdered seeds <strong>of</strong> Licaria puchury-major (Mart.) Kosterm.<br />
(Lauraceae) containing 51.3% <strong>of</strong> safrol (43), 3.3% <strong>of</strong> eugenol (4), <strong>and</strong> 2.9% <strong>of</strong> methyleugenol (27)<br />
reduced locomotion <strong>and</strong> anesthetized mice, as well as affording protection against electroshockinduced<br />
convulsions (Carlini et al., 1983).
Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in the Central Nervous System 301<br />
10.2.2.1 Effects <strong>of</strong> Individual Components<br />
Section 10.2 listed the effects <strong>of</strong> several EO components found in traditionally used species, including<br />
a-pinene (1), eugenol (4), limonene (14), myrcene (15), citral (16), epi-nepetalactone (23), transanethole<br />
(24), a-trans-ocimene (25), allo-ocimene (26), methyleugenol (27), borneol (29), isoborneol<br />
(30), citronellal (38), geraniol (39), <strong>and</strong> citronellol (40); anticonvulsive, muscle relaxants, anxiolityc<br />
<strong>and</strong>/or hypnotic properties were observed with these compounds when given i.p. to mice (Vale et al.,<br />
1999, 2002; Galati et al., 2004; Koo et al., 2004; Sayyah et al., 2004; Cassel <strong>and</strong> Vargas, 2006;<br />
Blanco et al., 2007; Quintans-Júnior et al., 2007).<br />
Linalool (3) is a monoterpene commonly found as a major volatile component <strong>of</strong> EOs in several<br />
aromatic plant species, such as Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia Mill (Lamiaceae), Rosa damascena Mill.<br />
(Rosaceae), Citrus bergamia Risso (Rutaceae), Melissa <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L. (Lamiaceae), Rosmarinus<br />
<strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L. (Lamiaceae), Cymbopogon citratus DC ex Nees (Poaceae), <strong>and</strong> Mentha piperita L.<br />
(Lamiaceae). Interestingly, many linalool-producing species are traditionally used as sedative, analgesic,<br />
hypnotic, or anxiolytic remedies in traditional medicine <strong>and</strong> some as well in aromatherapy<br />
(Elisabetsky et al., 1995a).<br />
As mentioned above, Aeolanthus suaveolens Mar. ex Spreng. (Lamiaceae) is used as an anticonvulsant<br />
through the Brazilian Amazon. The EO obtained from Aeolanthus suaveolens <strong>and</strong> its main<br />
component linalool (3) proved to be anticonvulsant against several types <strong>of</strong> experimental convulsions,<br />
including those induced by PTZ <strong>and</strong> transcorneal electroshock (Elisabetsky et al., 1995a),<br />
intracerebraly injected quinolinic acid, <strong>and</strong> i.p. NMDA (Elisabetsky et al., 1999). Moreover, psychopharmacological<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> linalool (3) showed dose-dependent marked sedative effects,<br />
including hypnotic, hypothermic, increased sleeping time, <strong>and</strong> decreased spontaneous locomotion<br />
in mice (i.p.) (Elisabetsky et al., 1995a; Linck et al., 2008). Decreased motor activity was also<br />
reported in mice by Buchbauer’s group (Buchbauer et al., 1991). Indicating anxiolityc properties<br />
linalool (3) was reported to have anticonflict effects (mice, i.p.) in the Geller <strong>and</strong> Vogel tests, <strong>and</strong><br />
similar findings were reported for lavender oil (Umezu, 2006). Analgesic properties were observed<br />
against chemical (rats, p.o.; Barocelli et al., 2004) (mice, s.c.; Peana et al., 2004a, 2004b) <strong>and</strong> thermal<br />
(mice, s.c., Peana et al., 2003) nociceptive stimuli. Since anti-inflammatory activity (rats, s.c.;<br />
Peana et al., 2002) has also been reported, it is not clear if linalool-induced analgesia is <strong>of</strong> central<br />
origin. Nevertheless, these experimental data are relevant to clinical studies indicating that aromatherapy<br />
with lavender can reduce the dem<strong>and</strong> for opioids during the immediate postoperative<br />
period (Kim et al., 2007), <strong>and</strong> deserve further investigation. Linalool local anesthetic effects were<br />
observed in vivo by the conjunctival reflex test, <strong>and</strong> in vitro by phrenic nerve-hemidiaphragm preparation<br />
(Ghelardini et al., 1999).<br />
10.2.2.2 Effects <strong>of</strong> Inhaled EOs<br />
Despite the wide <strong>and</strong> growing use <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy in the treatment <strong>of</strong> a diversity <strong>of</strong> ailments, including<br />
those <strong>of</strong> central origin (Perry <strong>and</strong> Perry, 2006), <strong>and</strong> the alleged effects <strong>of</strong> incenses <strong>and</strong> other means<br />
<strong>of</strong> ambient aromas, experimental data on psychopharmacological properties <strong>of</strong> inhaled EOs is surprisingly<br />
scarce. Moreover, few <strong>of</strong> the studies control for inhalation flow <strong>and</strong> it is difficult to estimate<br />
the actual concentration <strong>of</strong> whatever is being inhaled. However, evidences that EOs <strong>and</strong> its components<br />
are absorbed by inhalation are available. After mice were exposed to a cage loaded with 27 mg<br />
<strong>of</strong> linalool (3) for 30, 60, or 90 min, plasma linalool concentrations <strong>of</strong>, respectively, 1.0, 2.7, <strong>and</strong><br />
3.0 ng/mL were found (Buchbauer et al., 1991); these exposure schedules resulted in an exposuredependent<br />
decrease in locomotion. Moreover, detectable plasma concentrations at the nanogram level<br />
were reported for as many as 40 different aromatic compounds after 60 min <strong>of</strong> inhalation (Buchbauer<br />
et al., 1993). Therefore, despite the lack <strong>of</strong> precise measures <strong>of</strong> inhaled <strong>and</strong>/or absorbed quantities, it<br />
is arguable that animal studies with inhaled aromas are nevertheless informative.<br />
Inhalation <strong>of</strong> citrus-based aromas [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck (Rutaceae)] or fragrances were<br />
found to restore stress-induced immunosuppression (Shibata et al., 1990) <strong>and</strong> antidepressant-like<br />
effects in rats (2 mL/min EO in the air flux) (Komori et al., 1995a). A clinical study with depressed
302 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
patients revealed that it was possible to reduce the needed antidepressants’ doses by inhaling a<br />
mixture <strong>of</strong> citrus oils; moreover, inhalation <strong>of</strong> the oil by itself was antidepressive <strong>and</strong> normalized<br />
neuroendocrine hormone levels (cortisol <strong>and</strong> dopamine) in depressive patients (Komori et al., 1995b).<br />
Relevant to these findings, inhaled lemon oil [Citrus limonum Risso (Rutaceae)] has been shown to<br />
increase the turnover <strong>of</strong> dopamine <strong>and</strong> serotonin after inhalation in mice (Komiya et al., 2006).<br />
Anxiolytic proprieties were observed in rats with the plus maze model after 7 min rose oil inhalation;<br />
this is the only report <strong>of</strong> inhaled effects in animals after a short period <strong>of</strong> inhalation, although<br />
the procedure <strong>of</strong> leaving four cotton balls embedded with 2 mL <strong>of</strong> EO lacks st<strong>and</strong>ardization (Almeida<br />
et al., 2004). As mentioned above, inhaled cedrol was shown to be sedative in rats (Kagawa et al.,<br />
2003), <strong>and</strong> the inhalation <strong>of</strong> a volatile mixture from the TCM SuHeXiang Wan composed <strong>of</strong> 21.4%<br />
borneol (29), 33.3% isoborneol (30), 5.9% eugenol (4), <strong>and</strong> other minor components delayed the<br />
appearance <strong>of</strong> PTZ-induced convulsions suggesting GABAergic modulation (Koo et al., 2004).<br />
Inhaled lavender oil [0–1–2 mL, 25% <strong>of</strong> linalool (3) <strong>and</strong> 46% <strong>of</strong> linalyl acetate (44)] demonstrated<br />
anxiolytic effects in rats, as shown by decreased peripheral movement <strong>and</strong> defecation in an open<br />
field, after at least 30 min <strong>of</strong> inhalation (Shaw et al., 2007). Similar effects were observed with<br />
inhaled lavender containing 38.47% <strong>of</strong> linalool (3) <strong>and</strong> 43.98% <strong>of</strong> linalyl acetate (44) in gerbils,<br />
showing increased exploratory behavior in the elevated plus maze test after 1 or 14 days inhalation<br />
(Bradley et al., 2007a). In agreement with studies with inhaled lavender EO, anxiolytic activity was<br />
observed in mice after inhaling (±)-linalool (3) at 1% or 3% inhaled for 60 min using the light/dark<br />
<strong>and</strong> an immobilization-induced stress paradigms; moreover, after the same inhalation procedure<br />
isolated mice exhibited decreased aggression toward an intruder, <strong>and</strong> increased social interaction<br />
was also observed (da Silva et al., 2008).<br />
Finally, antinociceptive (mice) <strong>and</strong> gastroprotective effects (rats) <strong>of</strong> orally given or inhaled<br />
(60 min in a camera saturated with 2.4 μL/L) Lav<strong>and</strong>ula hybrida Rev. (Lamiaceae) EO <strong>and</strong> its<br />
principal constituents linalool (3) <strong>and</strong> linalyl acetate (44) have also been reported (Barocelli et al.,<br />
2004).<br />
10.2.3 MECHANISM OF ACTION UNDERLYING PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF EOS<br />
The mechanisms <strong>of</strong> action underlying the effects <strong>of</strong> fragrances as complex mixtures as found in<br />
natura, or even for isolated components are far from been clarified, but seem to differ among<br />
different fragrances (Komiya et al., 2006). If the overall pharmacological effects <strong>of</strong> an EO depend<br />
on the contribution <strong>of</strong> its various components, the mechanism <strong>of</strong> action <strong>of</strong> a complex mixture is<br />
far more complex than a simple sum <strong>of</strong> each component’s physiological consequence. Interaction<br />
among the various substances present in EOs can modify each other’s pharmacodynamic <strong>and</strong><br />
pharmacokinetic properties; nevertheless, studying the pharmacodynamic basis <strong>of</strong> isolated components<br />
is helpful for a comprehensive underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the basis <strong>of</strong> the physiological <strong>and</strong> psychopharmacological<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> EOs.<br />
Rats treated (i.p.) with the isolated components <strong>of</strong> lemon EO, such as R-(+)-limonene (14),<br />
S-(−)-limonene (45), <strong>and</strong> citral, did not show the cold stress-induced elevation in norepinephrine<br />
<strong>and</strong> dopamine (Fukumoto et al., 2008); the authors suggested that these effects are related to<br />
changes in monoamine release in rat brain slices induced by these compounds (Fukumoto et al.,<br />
2003). Complementary to these findings, inhaled lemon oil (cage with a cotton ball with 1 mL,<br />
90 min) has also been reported to increase the turnover <strong>of</strong> dopamine <strong>and</strong> serotonin in mice (Komiya<br />
et al., 2006).<br />
Inhalation (2 g <strong>of</strong> fragrance/day, 2 × 3 h/day, for 7, 14, or 30 days at home cages) <strong>of</strong> Acorus<br />
gramineus Sol<strong>and</strong>er (Acoraceae) EO inhibited the activity <strong>of</strong> g-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transaminase<br />
(an enzyme critical for metabolizing GABA at synapses), thereby significantly increasing<br />
GABA levels; a decrease in glutamate levels was also reported in this study (Koo et al., 2003). Both<br />
<strong>of</strong> these alterations in the inhibitory <strong>and</strong> excitatory neurotransmitter systems are compatible with<br />
<strong>and</strong> relevant to the sedative <strong>and</strong> anticonvulsant effects mentioned earlier. Neuroprotective effects on
Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in the Central Nervous System 303<br />
cultured neurons were also reported for Acorus gramineus EO, apparently attained through the<br />
blockade <strong>of</strong> NMDA receptors given that this oil inhibits [ 3 H]-MK801 binding (Cho et al., 2001).<br />
Other examples <strong>of</strong> EO actions on amino acid neurotransmitters are available. Morrone et al.<br />
(2007) using in vivo microdialysis showed that bergamot EO (i.p.) increased the levels <strong>of</strong> aspartate,<br />
glycine, taurine, GABA, <strong>and</strong> glutamate in a Ca 2+ -dependent manner in rat hippocampus; the authors<br />
suggested that these same effects may be relevant for other monoterpenes affecting the CNS.<br />
Inhibition <strong>of</strong> glutamatemediated neurotransmission is in part responsible for the mechanisms <strong>of</strong><br />
action underlying the above-mentioned anticonvulsant effects <strong>of</strong> linalool (3). Neurochemical assays<br />
reveal that (±)-linalool (3) acts as a competitive antagonist <strong>of</strong> l-[ 3 H]-glutamate binding (Elisabetsky<br />
et al., 1999), <strong>and</strong> also shows a dose-dependent noncompetitive inhibition <strong>of</strong> [ 3 H]-MK801 binding<br />
(IC 50 =2.97 mM) indicating antagonism <strong>of</strong> NMDA glutamate receptors (Brum et al., 2001a).<br />
(±)-Linalool (3) also decreases the potassium-stimulated glutamate release <strong>and</strong> uptake in mice cortical<br />
synaptosomes, without affecting basal glutamate release (Brum et al., 2001b). This neurochemical<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ile explains, for instance, the linalool-induced delay in NMDA-induced convulsions<br />
<strong>and</strong> blockade <strong>of</strong> quinolinic acid-induced convulsions (Elisabetsky et al., 1999). Eugenol (4) was also<br />
found to inhibit excitotoxic neuronal effects induced by NMDA, apparently involving modulation<br />
<strong>of</strong> NMDA glutamate receptor, <strong>and</strong> inhibition <strong>of</strong> Ca 2+ uptake (Wie et al., 1997; Won et al., 1998).<br />
Because (±)-linalool (3) is also able to protect against PTZ- <strong>and</strong> picrotoxin-induced convulsions<br />
(Elisabetsky et al., 1999), a GABAergic modulation could also be in place. Nevertheless, (±)-linalool<br />
(3) did not alter [ 3 H]-muscinol binding (Brum, 2001a) suggesting that, if existing at all, linalool<br />
modulation <strong>of</strong> the GABAergic system is not mediated by GABA A receptors.<br />
Potentially relevant to the pharmacology pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> linalool (3), patch-clamp techniques demonstrated<br />
that the monoterpene (no isomer specified) suppressed the Ca 2+ current in rat sensory neurons<br />
<strong>and</strong> in rat cerebellar Purkinje cells (Narusuye et al., 2005). Based on their study with lavender EO,<br />
Aoshima <strong>and</strong> Hamamoto (1999) suggested that the GABAergic transmission may be <strong>of</strong> relevance for<br />
the mechanism <strong>of</strong> action <strong>of</strong> other monoterpenes, such as a-pinene (1), eugenol (4), citronellal (38), citronellol<br />
(40), <strong>and</strong> hinokitiol (46) (Aoshima <strong>and</strong> Hamamoto, 1999). Additionally, the antinociceptive<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> R-(−)-linalool (7) seems to involve several receptors, including opioids, cholinergic M 2 , dopamine<br />
D 2, adenosine A 1 <strong>and</strong> A 2A , as well as changes in K + channels (Peana et al., 2003, 2004a, 2006).<br />
Relevant to studies on cognition, Salvia lav<strong>and</strong>ulifolia Vahl (Lamiaceae) EO <strong>and</strong> isolated<br />
monoterpene constituents were shown to inhibit brain acetylcholinesterase <strong>and</strong> to present antioxidant<br />
properties (Perry et al., 2001, 2002).<br />
Overall, its seems reasonable to argue that the modulation <strong>of</strong> glutamate <strong>and</strong> GABA neurotransmitter<br />
systems are likely to be the critical mechanisms responsible for the sedative, anxiolytic, <strong>and</strong><br />
anticonvulsant proprieties <strong>of</strong> linalool <strong>and</strong> EOs containing linalool (3) in significant proportions.<br />
CHEMICAL STRUCTURES OF MENTIONED CNS ACTIVE COMPOUNDS<br />
O<br />
a-Pinene (1)<br />
1,8-Cineole (2)<br />
HO<br />
MeO<br />
Linalool (3)<br />
HO<br />
Eugenol (4)
304 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
Methyl jasmonate (5)<br />
trans-Jasminlactone (6)<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
H 3 C<br />
(R)-(-)-linalool (7) (S)-(+)-linalool (8)<br />
H 3 C<br />
D-3-Carene (9)<br />
O<br />
Bornyl acetate (10)<br />
O<br />
NCS<br />
N<br />
Pyridine (11)<br />
Allyl isothiocyanate (12)<br />
OH<br />
2-Phenyl ethyl alcohol (13) Limonene (14)<br />
O<br />
Myrcene (15)<br />
Citral (16)<br />
O<br />
MeO<br />
Methylchavicol (18)<br />
Carvone (17)<br />
OH<br />
Geraniol (20)<br />
OH<br />
Thymol (19)
Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in the Central Nervous System 305<br />
p-Cymene (21) a-Terpinene (22)<br />
O<br />
O<br />
MeO<br />
trans-Anethole (24)<br />
Epi-nepetalactone (23)<br />
trans-Ocimene (25) allo-Ocimene (26)<br />
MeO<br />
MeO<br />
MeO<br />
MeO<br />
Methyl eugenol (27)<br />
b-Asarone (28)<br />
OMe<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
Borneol (29)<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
Isoborneol (30)<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
a-Terpineol (32)<br />
Isopulegol (31)<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
Thujone (33)<br />
b-Eudesmol (34)
306 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
O<br />
a-Eudesmol (35)<br />
Caryophyllene oxide (36)<br />
Citronellal (38)<br />
O<br />
b-Eudesmene (37)<br />
Geraniol (39)<br />
OH<br />
Citronellol (40)<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
Carvacrol (41)<br />
O<br />
Pulegone (42)<br />
CH 3 COO<br />
O<br />
Linalyl acetate (44)<br />
Safrol (43)<br />
O<br />
S-(-)-limonene (45)<br />
HO<br />
Hinokitiol (46)<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Almeida, R.N., S.C. Motta, C.B. Faturi, B. Cattallini, <strong>and</strong> J.R. Leite, 2004. Anxiolytic-like effects <strong>of</strong> rose oil<br />
inhalation on the elevated plus-maze test in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 77: 361–364.<br />
Adman A, Y. Fathollahi, M. Sayyah, M. Kamalinejad, <strong>and</strong> A. Omrani, 2006. Eugenol depresses synaptic transmission<br />
but does not prevent the induction <strong>of</strong> long-term potentiation in CA1 region <strong>of</strong> rat hippocampal<br />
slice. Phytomedicine, 13: 146–151.<br />
Aoki, H., 1996. Effect <strong>of</strong> odors from coniferous woods on contingent negative variation (CNV). Zairyo, 45(4):<br />
397–402.
Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in the Central Nervous System 307<br />
Aoshima, H. <strong>and</strong> K. Hamamoto, 1999. Potentiation <strong>of</strong> GABAA receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes by<br />
perfume <strong>and</strong> phytoncid. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 63(4): 743–748.<br />
Asakura, K., Y. Matsuo, T. Oshima, et al., 2000. v-Agatoxin IVA-sensitive Ca 2+ channel blocker, a-eudesmol,<br />
protects against brain injury after focal ischemia in rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol., 394: 57–65.<br />
Ashton, H., J.E. Millman, R. Telford, <strong>and</strong> J.W. Thompson, 1977. The use <strong>of</strong> event-related slow potentials <strong>of</strong> the<br />
human brain as an objective method to study the effects <strong>of</strong> centrally acting drugs [proceedings].<br />
Neuropharmacology, 16(7–8): 531–532.<br />
Aston-Jones, G., S. Chen, Y. Zhu, <strong>and</strong> M.L. Oshinsky, 2001. A neural circuit for circadian regulation <strong>of</strong> arousal.<br />
Nat. Neurosci., (4): 732–738.<br />
Baltissen, R. <strong>and</strong> H. Heimann, 1995. Aktivierung, Orientierung und Habituation bei Gesunden und psychisch<br />
Kranken. In: Biopsychologie von Streß und emotionalen Reaktionen—Ansätze interdisziplinärer<br />
Forschung, F. Debus, G. Erdmann <strong>and</strong> K.W. Dallus, eds. Göttingen: Hogrefe-Verlag für Psychologie.<br />
Barocelli, E., F. Calcina, M. Chiavarini, et al., 2004. Antinociceptive <strong>and</strong> gastroprotective effects <strong>of</strong> inhaled <strong>and</strong><br />
orally administered Lav<strong>and</strong>ula hybrida Reverchon “Grosso” essential oil. Life Sci., 76(2): 213–223.<br />
Baron, R.A., 1990. Environmentally induced positive affect: Its impact on self-efficacy, task performance,<br />
negotiation, <strong>and</strong> conflict. J. Appl. Social Psychol., 20(5, Part 2): 368–384.<br />
Baron, R.A. <strong>and</strong> J. Thomley, 1994. A whiff <strong>of</strong> reality: Positive affect as a potential mediator <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong><br />
pleasant fragrances on task performance <strong>and</strong> helping. Environ. Behav., 26(6): 766–784.<br />
Baxter, M.G. <strong>and</strong> A.A. Chiba, 1999. Cognitive functions <strong>of</strong> the basal forebrain. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 9(2):<br />
178–183.<br />
Becker-Carus, C. 1981. Grundriß der Physiologischen Psychologie. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.<br />
Bensafi, M., C. Rouby, V. Farget, et al., 2002. Autonomic nervous system responses to odours: The role <strong>of</strong><br />
pleasantness <strong>and</strong> arousal. Chem. Senses, 27(8): 703–709.<br />
Bermpohl, F., A. Pascual-Leone, A. Amedi, et al., 2006. Dissociable networks for the expectancy <strong>and</strong> perception<br />
<strong>of</strong> emotional stimuli in the human brain. Neuroimage, 30(2): 588–600.<br />
Bielenberg, J., 2007. Zentralnervöse Effekte durch Thujon. Medizinische Monatsschrift für Pharmazeuten,<br />
30(9): 322–326.<br />
Blanco, M.M., C.A.R.A. Costa, A.O. Freire, J.G. Santos Jr., <strong>and</strong> M. Costa, 2009. Neurobehavioral effect <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oil <strong>of</strong> Cymbopogon citratus in mice. Phytomedicine, 16(2–3): 265–270.<br />
Bradley, B.F., N.J. Starkey, S.L. Brown, <strong>and</strong> R.W. Lea, 2007a. Anxiolytic effects <strong>of</strong> Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia<br />
odour on the Mongolian gerbil elevated plus maze. J. Ethnopharmacol., 111(3): 517–525.<br />
Bradley, B.F., N.J. Starkey, S.L. Brown, <strong>and</strong> R.W. Lea, 2007b. The effects <strong>of</strong> prolonged rose odor inhalation in<br />
two animal models <strong>of</strong> anxiety. Physiol. Behav., 92:931–938.<br />
Brum, L.F.S., E. Elisabetsky, <strong>and</strong> D. Souza, 2001a. Effects <strong>of</strong> linalool on [ 3 H] MK801 <strong>and</strong> [ 3 H] muscimol binding<br />
in mouse cortical membranes. Phytother. Res., 15(5): 422–425.<br />
Brum, L.F.S., T. Emanuelli, D. Souza, <strong>and</strong> E. Elisabetsky, 2001b. Effects <strong>of</strong> linalool on glutamate release <strong>and</strong><br />
uptake in mouse cortical synaptosomes. Neurochem. Res., 25(3): 191–194.<br />
Buchbauer, G., L. Jirovetz, W. Jäger, H. Dietrich, <strong>and</strong> C. Plank, 1991. Aromatherapy: Evidence for sedative<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> lavender after inhalation. J. Biosci., 46: 1067–1072.<br />
Buchbauer, G., L. Jirovetz, M. Czejka, C. Nasel, <strong>and</strong> H. Dietrich, 1993. New results in aromatherapy research.<br />
Paper read at Proc. 24th Int. Symp. on <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>. TU Berlin, Germany, July 21–24.<br />
Buchbauer, G., L. Jirovetz, W. Jäger, C. Plank, <strong>and</strong> H. Dietrich, 1993. Fragrance compounds <strong>and</strong> essential oil<br />
with sedative effects upon inhalation. J. Pharmacol. Sci., 82: 660–664.<br />
Carlini, E.A., A.B. de Oliveira, <strong>and</strong> G.C. de Oliveira, 1983. Psychopharmacological effects <strong>of</strong> the essential oil<br />
fraction <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the hydrolate obtained from the seeds <strong>of</strong> Licaria puchury-major. J. Ethnopharmacol.,<br />
8(2): 225–236.<br />
Carvalho-Freitas, M.I.R. <strong>and</strong> M. Costa, 2002. Anxiolytic <strong>and</strong> sedative effetcs <strong>of</strong> extracts <strong>and</strong> essential oils from<br />
Citrus aurantium L. Biol. Pharm. Bull., 25(12): 1629–1633.<br />
Cassel, E. <strong>and</strong> R.M.F. Vargas, 2006. Experiments <strong>and</strong> modeling <strong>of</strong> the Cymbopogon winterianus essential oil<br />
extraction by steam distillation. J. Mexican Chem. Soc., 50(3): 126–129.<br />
Chen, S.W., L. Min, W.J. Li, et al., 2004. The effects <strong>of</strong> angelica essential oil in three murine tests <strong>of</strong> anxiety.<br />
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 79: 377–382.<br />
Chiou, L.C., J.Y. Ling, <strong>and</strong> C.C. Chang, 1995. b-Eudesmol as an antidote for intoxication from organophosphorus<br />
anticholinesterase agents. Eur. J. Pharmacol., 292: 151–156.<br />
Chiou, L.-C., J.-Y. Ling, <strong>and</strong> C.-C. Chang, 1997. Chinese herb constituent b-eudesmol alleviated the electroshock<br />
seizures in mice <strong>and</strong> electrographic seizures in rat hippocampal slices. Neurosci. Lett., 231: 171–174.<br />
Cho, J., J.Y. Kong, D.Y. Jeong, et al., 2001. NMDA receptor-mediated neuroprotection by essential oils from<br />
the rhizomes <strong>of</strong> Acorus gramineus. Life Sci., 68: 1567–1573.
308 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Chu, S., 2008. Olfactory conditioning <strong>of</strong> positive performance in humans. Chem. Senses, 33(1): 65–71.<br />
Chu, S. <strong>and</strong> J.J. Downes, 2002. Proust nose best: Odors are better cues <strong>of</strong> autobiographical memory. Memory<br />
Cognit., 30(4): 511–518.<br />
Cooke, B. <strong>and</strong> E. Ernst, 2000. Aromatherapy: A systematic review. Br. J. General Pract., 50: 493–496.<br />
da Silva, A.L., V.M. Linck, M. Figueiró, et al., 2008. Inhaled linalool reduces stress <strong>and</strong> aggressivity in mice.<br />
Planta Med., submitted.<br />
Danuser, B., D. Moser, T. Vitale-Sethre, R. Hirsig, <strong>and</strong> H. Krueger, 2003. Performance in a complex task <strong>and</strong><br />
breathing under odor exposure. Human Factors, 45(4): 549–562.<br />
Davidson, R.J. <strong>and</strong> W. Irwin, 1999. The functional neuroanatomy <strong>of</strong> emotion <strong>and</strong> affective style. Trends<br />
Cognitive Sci., 3(1): 11–21.<br />
de Sousa, D.P., L. Quintans, <strong>and</strong> R.N. de Almeida, 2007. Evolution <strong>of</strong> the anticonvulsant activity <strong>of</strong> a-terpineol.<br />
Pharm. Biol., 45(1): 69–70.<br />
de Souza, G.P.C., E. Elisabetsky, D.S.Nunes, S.K.L. Rabelo, <strong>and</strong> M.N. da Silva, 1997. Anticonvulsant properties<br />
<strong>of</strong> g-decanolactone in mice. J. Ethnopharmacol., 58(3): 175–81.<br />
Degel, J. <strong>and</strong> E.P. Köster, 1999. Odors: Implicit memory <strong>and</strong> performance effects. Chem. Senses, 24(3):<br />
317–325.<br />
Diego, M.A., N.A. Jones, T. Field, et al., 1998. Aromatherapy positively affects mood, EEG patterns <strong>of</strong> alertness<br />
<strong>and</strong> math computations. Int. J. Neurosci., 96 (3–4):217–224.<br />
Duffy, E., 1972. Activation. In: <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> Psychophysiology, N.S. Greenfield <strong>and</strong> R.A. Sternbach, eds.<br />
New York: Holt, Rinehart <strong>and</strong> Winston Inc.<br />
Duke, J.A., M.J. D. Bogenschutz-Godwin, J. Cellier, <strong>and</strong> P.A.K. Duke, 2002. <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> Medicinal Herbs,<br />
2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press.<br />
Elisabetsky, E., G.P.C. de Souza, M.A.C. Santos, et al., 1995a. Sedative properties <strong>of</strong> linalool. Fitoterapia, 66:<br />
407–414.<br />
Elisabetsky, E., J. Marschner, <strong>and</strong> D.O. Souza, 1995b. Effects <strong>of</strong> linalool on glutamatergic system in the rat<br />
cerebral-cortex. Neurochem. Res., 20(4): 461–465.<br />
Elisabetsky, E., L.F. Brum, <strong>and</strong> D.O. Souza, 1999. Anticonvulsant properties <strong>of</strong> linalool in glutamate-related<br />
seizure models. Phytomedicine, 6(2): 107–113.<br />
Epple, G. <strong>and</strong> R.S. Herz, 1999. Ambient odors associated to failure influence cognitive performance in children.<br />
Dev. Psychobiol., 35(2): 103–7.<br />
Field, T., M. Diego, M. Hern<strong>and</strong>ez-Reif, et al., 2005. Lavender fragrance cleansing gel effects on relaxation.<br />
Int. J. Neurosci., 115(2):207–222.<br />
Freire, C.M., M.O.M. Marques, <strong>and</strong> M. Costa, 2006. Effects <strong>of</strong> seasonal variation on the central nervous system<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> Ocimum gratissimum L. essential oil. J. Ethnopharmacol., 105: 161–166.<br />
Friedl, S., E. Laistler, C. Windischberger, E. Moser, <strong>and</strong> E. Heuberger, 2007. Are odorants pharmaceuticals?—<br />
Pharmacodynamic aspects <strong>of</strong> fragrance effects on human attention. Paper read at 38th Int. Symp. on<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, 9 September 2007–12 September 2007, at Graz, Austria.<br />
Fujiwara, R., T. Komori, Y. Noda, et al., 1998. Effects <strong>of</strong> a long-term inhalation <strong>of</strong> fragrances on the stress-induced<br />
immunosuppression in mice. Neuroimmunomodulation, 5(6): 318–322.<br />
Fukumoto, S., E. Sawasaki, S. Okuyama, Y. Miyake, <strong>and</strong> H. Yokogoshi, 2003. Flavor components <strong>of</strong> monoterpenes<br />
in citrus essential oils enhance the release <strong>of</strong> monoamines from rat brain slices. Nutr. Neurosci.,<br />
9(1–2): 73–80.<br />
Fukumoto, S., A. Morishita, K. Furutachi, et al., 2008. Effect <strong>of</strong> flavors components in lemon essential oil on<br />
physical or psychological stress. Stress Health, 24: 3–12.<br />
Galati, E.M., N. Miceli, M. Galluzzo, M.F. Taviano, <strong>and</strong> O. Tzakou, 2004. Neuropharmacological effects <strong>of</strong><br />
epinepetalactone from Nepeta sibthorpii behavioral <strong>and</strong> anticonvulsant activity. Pharm. Biol., 42(6):<br />
391–395.<br />
Ghelardini, C., N. Galeotti, G. Salvatore, <strong>and</strong> G. Mazzanti, 1999. Local anesthetic activity <strong>of</strong> the essential oil<br />
<strong>of</strong> Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia. Planta Med., 65(8): 700–703.<br />
Gilbert, A.N., S.C. Knasko, <strong>and</strong> J. Sabini, 1997. Sex differences in task performance associated with attention<br />
to ambient odor. Arch. Environ. Health, 52(3): 195–199.<br />
Gill, T.M., M. Sarter, <strong>and</strong> B. Givens, 2000. Sustained visual attention performance-associated prefrontal neuronal<br />
activity: Evidence for cholinergic modulation. J. Neurosci., 20(12): 4745–4757.<br />
Goddard, L., L. Pring, <strong>and</strong> N. Felmingham, 2005. The effects <strong>of</strong> cue modality on the quality <strong>of</strong> personal memories<br />
retrieved. Memory, 13(1): 79–86.<br />
Gottfried, J.A. <strong>and</strong> D.A. Zald, 2005. Brain Res. Rev., 50: 287–304.<br />
Gould, A. <strong>and</strong> G.N. Martin, 2001. ‘A good odour to breathe?’ The effect <strong>of</strong> pleasant ambient odour on human<br />
visual vigilance. Appl. Cognitive Psychol., 15: 225–232.
Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in the Central Nervous System 309<br />
Grayer, R.J., G.C. Kite, F.J. Goldstone, et al., 1996. Intraspecific taxonomy <strong>and</strong> essential oil chemotypes in<br />
sweet basil, Ocimum basilicum. Phytochemistry, 43(5): 1033–1039.<br />
Grilly, D.M., 2002. Drugs & Human Behavior. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.<br />
Grunwald, M., T. Weiss, W. Krause, et al., 1999. Power <strong>of</strong> theta waves in the EEG <strong>of</strong> human subjects increases<br />
during recall <strong>of</strong> haptic information. Neurosci. Lett., 260(3): 189–192.<br />
Habel, U., K. Koch, K. Pauly, et al., 2007. The influence <strong>of</strong> olfactory-induced negative emotion on verbal working<br />
memory: Individual differences in neurobehavioral findings. Brain Res., 1152: 158–170.<br />
Haneyama, H. <strong>and</strong> M. Kagatani, 2007. Sedatives containing Nardostachys chinensis extracts. CAN, 147: 197–215.<br />
Haze, S., K. Sakai, <strong>and</strong> Y. Gozu, 2002. Effects <strong>of</strong> fragrance inhalation on sympathetic activity in normal adults.<br />
Jpn. J. Pharmacol., 90: 247–253.<br />
Herz, R.S., 2004. A naturalistic analysis <strong>of</strong> autobiographical memories triggered by olfactory visual <strong>and</strong> auditory<br />
stimuli. Chem. Senses, 29(3): 217–24.<br />
Herz, R.S. <strong>and</strong> G.C. Cupchik, 1995. The emotional distinctiveness <strong>of</strong> odor-evoked memories. Chem. Senses,<br />
20(5): 517–528.<br />
Herz, R.S., J. Eliassen, S. Bel<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> T. Souza, 2004. Neuroimaging evidence for the emotional potency <strong>of</strong><br />
odor-evoked memory. Neuropsychologia, 42(3): 371–378.<br />
Heuberger, E., T. Hongratanaworakit, C. Böhm, R. Weber, <strong>and</strong> G. Buchbauer, 2001. Effects <strong>of</strong> chiral fragrances<br />
on human autonomic nervous system parameters <strong>and</strong> self-evaluation. Chem. Senses, 26(3): 281–292.<br />
Heuberger, E., S. Redhammer, <strong>and</strong> G. Buchbauer, 2004. Transdermal absorption <strong>of</strong> (-)-linalool induces autonomic<br />
deactivation but has no impact on ratings <strong>of</strong> well-being in humans. Neuropsychopharmacology,<br />
29: 1925–1932.<br />
Heuberger, E., J. Ilmberger, E. Hartter, <strong>and</strong> G. Buchbauer, 2008. Physiological <strong>and</strong> behavioral effects <strong>of</strong><br />
1,8-cineol <strong>and</strong> (±)-linalool: A comparison <strong>of</strong> inhalation <strong>and</strong> massage aromatherapy. Nat. Prod. Commun.,<br />
3(7): 1103–1110.<br />
Hiruma, T., T. Matuoka, R. Asai, et al., 2005. Psychophysiological basis <strong>of</strong> smells. Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi,<br />
107(8): 790–801.<br />
Hiruma, T., H. Yabe, Y. Sato, T. Sutoh, <strong>and</strong> S. Kaneko, 2002. Differential effects <strong>of</strong> the hiba odor on CNV <strong>and</strong><br />
MMN. Biol. Psychol., 61(3): 321–331.<br />
Ho, C. <strong>and</strong> C. Spence, 2005. Olfactory facilitation <strong>of</strong> dual-task performance. Neurosci. Lett., 389(1): 35–40.<br />
Hoedlmoser, K., M. Schabus, W. Stadler, et al., 2007. EEG Theta-Aktivität während deklarativem Lernen und<br />
anschließendem REM-Schlaf im Zusammenhang mit allgemeiner Gedächtnisleistung. Klinische<br />
Neurophysiol., 38:DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-976432.<br />
Holl<strong>and</strong>, R.W., M. Hendriks, <strong>and</strong> H. Aarts, 2005. Smells like clean spirit. Nonconscious effects <strong>of</strong> scent on<br />
cognition <strong>and</strong> behavior. Psychol. Sci., 16(9): 689–693.<br />
Hongratanaworakit, T. <strong>and</strong> G. Buchbauer, 2006. Relaxing effects <strong>of</strong> ylang ylang oil on humans after transdermal<br />
absortion. Phytother. Res., 20(9): 758–763.<br />
Hotchkiss, S.A.M., 1998. Absorption <strong>of</strong> fragrance ingredients using in vitro models with human skin.<br />
In: Fragrances: Benefi cial <strong>and</strong> Adverse Effects, P.J. Frosch, J.D. Johansen, <strong>and</strong> I.R. White, eds. Berlin,<br />
Heidelberg: Springer.<br />
Ilmberger, J., E. Heuberger, C. Mahrh<strong>of</strong>er, et al., 2001. The influence <strong>of</strong> essential oils on human attention.<br />
I: Alertness. Chem. Senses, 26(3): 239–245.<br />
Ishikawa, S., Y. Miyake, <strong>and</strong> H. Yokogoshi, 2002. Effect <strong>of</strong> lemon odor on brain neurotransmitters in rat <strong>and</strong><br />
electroncephalogram in human subject. Aroma Res., 3(2): 126–130.<br />
Ishiyama, S., 2000. Aromachological effects <strong>of</strong> volatile compounds in forest. Aroma Res., 1(4): 15–21.<br />
Ismail, M. 2006. Central properties <strong>and</strong> chemical composition <strong>of</strong> Ocimum basilicum essential oil. Pharmaceut.<br />
Biol., 44(8): 619–626.<br />
Jellinek, J.S., 1997. Psychodynamic odor effects <strong>and</strong> their mechanisms. Cosmet. Toiletries, 112(9): 61–71.<br />
Jirovetz, L., G. Buchbauer, W. Jäger, et al., 1990. Determination <strong>of</strong> lavender oil fragrance compounds in blood<br />
samples. Fresenius’ J. Anal. Chem., 338: 922–923.<br />
Kaetsu, I., T. Tonoike, K. Uchida, et al., 1994. Effect <strong>of</strong> controlled release <strong>of</strong> odorants on electroencephalogram<br />
during mental activity. Proc. Int. Symp. on Controlled Release <strong>of</strong> Bioactive Materials 21ST: 589–590.<br />
Kagawa, D., H. Jokura, R. Ochiai, I. Tokimitsu, <strong>and</strong> H. Tsubone, 2003. The sedative effects <strong>and</strong> mechanism<br />
<strong>of</strong> action <strong>of</strong> cedrol inhalation with behavioral pharmacological evaluation. Planta Med., 69(7):<br />
637–641.<br />
K<strong>and</strong>el, E.R., J.H. Schwartz, <strong>and</strong> T.M. Jessel, 1991. Principles <strong>of</strong> Neural <strong>Science</strong>, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs,<br />
NJ: Prentice-Hall International Inc.<br />
Kaneda, H., H. Kojima, M. Takashio, <strong>and</strong> T. Yoshida, 2005. Relaxing effect <strong>of</strong> hop aromas on human. Aroma<br />
Res., 6(2): 164–170.
310 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Kaneda, H., H. Kojima, <strong>and</strong> J. Watari, 2006. Effect <strong>of</strong> beer flavors on changes in human feelings. Aroma Res.,<br />
7(4): 342–347.<br />
Kawano, K., 2001. Meditation-like effects <strong>of</strong> aroma observed in EEGs with consideration <strong>of</strong> each experience.<br />
Aroma Res., 2(1): 30–46.<br />
Keller, I. <strong>and</strong> O. Groemminger, 1993. Aufmerksamkeit. In: Neuropsychologische Diagnostik, D.Y. von Cramon,<br />
N. Mai <strong>and</strong> W. Ziegler, eds. Weinheim: VCH.<br />
Kepecs, A., N. Uchida, <strong>and</strong> Z.F. Mainen, 2006. The sniff as a unit <strong>of</strong> Olfactory processing. Chem. Senses,<br />
31 (2): 167–179.<br />
Kerl, S., 1997. Zur olfaktorischen Beeinflussbarkeit von Lernprozessen. Dragoco Rep., 44: 45–59.<br />
Kim, J.T., C.J. Ren, G.A. Fielding, et al., 2007. Treatment with lavender aromatherapy in post-anesthesia care<br />
unit reduces opioid requirements <strong>of</strong> morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic adjustable gastric<br />
b<strong>and</strong>ing. Obes. Surg., 17(7): 920–925.<br />
Kim, Y.-K. <strong>and</strong> S. Watanuki, 2003. Characteristics <strong>of</strong> electroencephalographic responses induced by a pleasant<br />
<strong>and</strong> an unpleasant odor. J. Physiol. Anthropol. Appl. Human Sci., 22(6): 285–91.<br />
Kline, J.P., G.C. Blackhart, K.M. Woodward, S.R. Williams, <strong>and</strong> G.E. Schwartz, 2000. Anterior electroencephalographic<br />
asymmetry changes in elderly women in response to a pleasant <strong>and</strong> an unpleasant odor.<br />
Biol. Psychol., 52(3): 241–250.<br />
Knasko, S.C., 1993. Performance, mood, <strong>and</strong> health during exposure to intermittent odors. Arch. Environ.<br />
Health, 48(5): 305–308.<br />
Komiya, M., T. Takeuchi, <strong>and</strong> E. Harada, 2006. Lemon oil vapor causes an anti-stress effect via modulating the<br />
5-HT <strong>and</strong> DA activities in mice. Behavioural Brain Res., 172: 240–249.<br />
Komori, T., R. Fujiwara, M. Tanida, <strong>and</strong> J. Nomura, 1995a. Potential antidepressant effects <strong>of</strong> lemon odor in<br />
rats. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol., 5(4): 477–480.<br />
Komori, T., R. Fujiwara, M. Tanida, J. Nomura, <strong>and</strong> M.M. Yokoyama, 1995b. Effects <strong>of</strong> citrus fragrance on<br />
immune function <strong>and</strong> depressive states. Neuroimmunomodulation, (2): 174–180.<br />
Koo, B.-S., K.-S. Park, J.-H. Ha, et al., 2003. Inhibitory effects <strong>of</strong> the fragrance inhalation <strong>of</strong> essential oil from<br />
Acorus gramineus on central nervous system. Bio. Pharm. Bull., 26 (7):978–82.<br />
Koo, B.-S., S.-I. Lee, J.-H. Ha, <strong>and</strong> D.U. Lee, 2004. Inhibitory effects <strong>of</strong> the essential oil from SuHeXiang Wa<br />
non the central nervous system after inhalation. Biol., Pharm. Bull., 27(4): 515–519.<br />
Kopell, B.S., W.K. Wittner, D.T. Lunde, L.J. Wolcott, <strong>and</strong> J.R. Tinklenberg, 1974. The effects <strong>of</strong> methamphetamine<br />
<strong>and</strong> secobarbital on the contingent negative variation amplitude. Psychopharmacology, 34(1):<br />
55–62.<br />
Kovar, K.A., B. Gropper, D. Friess, <strong>and</strong> H.P. Ammon, 1987. Blood levels <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole <strong>and</strong> locomotor activity<br />
<strong>of</strong> mice after inhalation <strong>and</strong> oral administration <strong>of</strong> rosemary oil. Planta Med., 53(4): 315–318.<br />
Krizhanovs’kii, S.A., I.H. Zima, M.Y. Makarchuk, N.H. Piskors’ka, <strong>and</strong> A.O. Chernins’kii, 2004. Effect <strong>of</strong><br />
citrus essential oil on the attention level <strong>and</strong> electrophysical parameters <strong>of</strong> human brain. Phys. Alive,<br />
12(1): 111–120.<br />
Kuroda, K., N. Inoue, Y. Ito, et al., 2005. Sedative effects <strong>of</strong> the jasmine tea odor <strong>and</strong> (R)-(−)-linalool, one <strong>of</strong><br />
its major odor components, on autonomic nerve activity <strong>and</strong> mood states. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.,<br />
95:107–114.<br />
Lehrner, J., C. Eckersberger, P. Walla, G. Postsch, <strong>and</strong> L. Deecke, 2000. Ambient odor <strong>of</strong> orange in a dental<br />
<strong>of</strong>fice reduces anxiety <strong>and</strong> improves mood in female patients. Physiol. Behav., 71: 83–86.<br />
Lee, C.F., T. Katsuura, S. Shibata, et al., 1994. Responses <strong>of</strong> electroencephalogram to different odors. Ann.<br />
Physiol. Anthropol., 13 (5):281–291.<br />
Leppanen, J.M., <strong>and</strong> J.K. Hietanen, 2003. Affect <strong>and</strong> face perception: Odors modulate the recognition advantage<br />
<strong>of</strong> happy faces. Emotion, 3(4): 315–326.<br />
Liao, J.F., S.Y. Huang, Y.M. Jan, L.L. Yu, <strong>and</strong> C.F. Chen, 1998. Central inhibitory effects <strong>of</strong> water extract <strong>of</strong><br />
Acori graminei rhizoma in mice. J. Ethnopharmacol., 61: 185–193.<br />
Linck,V.M., A.L. da Silva, M. Figueiró, et al., 2008. Sedative effects <strong>of</strong> inhaled linalool. Phytomedicine,<br />
submitted.<br />
Lorig, T.S., 1989. Human EEG <strong>and</strong> odor response. Progr. Neurobiol., 33(5-6): 387–398.<br />
Lorig, T.S., 2000. The application <strong>of</strong> electroencephalographic techniques to the study <strong>of</strong> human olfaction:<br />
A review <strong>and</strong> tutorial. Int. J. Psychophysiol., 36(2): 91–104.<br />
Lorig, T.S. <strong>and</strong> M. Roberts, 1990. Odor <strong>and</strong> cognitive alteration <strong>of</strong> the contingent negative variation. Chem.<br />
Senses, 15(5): 537–545.<br />
Lorig, T.S. <strong>and</strong> G.E. Schwartz, 1988. Brain <strong>and</strong> odor: I. Alteration <strong>of</strong> human EEG by odor administration.<br />
Psychobiology, 16(3): 281–284.
Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in the Central Nervous System 311<br />
Ludvigson, H.W. <strong>and</strong> T.R. Rottman, 1989. Effects <strong>of</strong> ambient odors <strong>of</strong> lavender <strong>and</strong> cloves on cognition, memory,<br />
affect <strong>and</strong> mood. Chem. Senses, 14(4): 525–536.<br />
Manley, C.H., 1993. Psychophysiological effect <strong>of</strong> odor. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 33(1): 57–62.<br />
Manley, C.H., 1997. Psychophysiology <strong>of</strong> odor. Rivista Italiana EPPOS (Spec. Num., 15th Journees<br />
Internationales Huiles Essentielles, 1996): pp. 375–386.<br />
Masago, R., T. Matsuda, Y. Kikuchi, et al., 2000. Effects <strong>of</strong> inhalation <strong>of</strong> essential oils on EEG activity <strong>and</strong><br />
sensory evaluation. J. Physiol. Anthropol. Appl. Human Sci., 19(1): 35–42.<br />
Matos, F.J.A., 1996. As ervas cidreiras do Nordeste do Brasil: estudo de três quimiotipos de Lippia alba (Mill.)<br />
N.E.Brown (Verbenaceae). Parte II—Farmacoquímica. Rev. Brasileira Farmácia, 77: 137–141.<br />
Meckes, M., F. Calzada, J. Tortoriello, J.L. González, <strong>and</strong> M. Martinez, 1997. Terpenoids isolated from<br />
Psidium guajava hexane extract with depressant activity on central nervous system. Phytother. Res.,<br />
10(7): 600–603.<br />
Michael, G.A., L. Jacquot, J.L. Millot, <strong>and</strong> G. Br<strong>and</strong>, 2005. Ambient odors influence the amplitude <strong>and</strong> time<br />
course <strong>of</strong> visual distraction. Behav. Neurosci., 119(3): 708–715.<br />
Miller, D.B. <strong>and</strong> J.P. O’Callaghan, 2006. The pharmacology <strong>of</strong> wakefulness. Metabolism, 55(Suppl. 2): S13–S19.<br />
Millot, J.L., G. Br<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> N. Mor<strong>and</strong>, 2002. Effects <strong>of</strong> ambient odors on reaction time in humans. Neurosci.<br />
Lett., 322(2): 79–82.<br />
Min, B.-C., S.-H. Jin, I.-H. Kang, et al., 2003. Analysis <strong>of</strong> mutual information content for EEG responses to<br />
odor stimulation for subjects classified by occupation. Chem. Senses, 28(9): 741–749.<br />
Moreira, M.R., G.M. Cruz, M.S. Lopes, et al., 2001. Effects <strong>of</strong> terpineol on the compound action potential <strong>of</strong><br />
the rat sciatic nerve. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res., 34: 1337–1340.<br />
Morgan, C.L., 1996. Odors as cues for the recall <strong>of</strong> words unrelated to odor. Perceptual Motor Skills, 83(3 Part 2):<br />
1227–1234.<br />
Morrone, L.A., L. Romboià, C. Pelle, et al., 2007. The essential oil <strong>of</strong> bergamot enhances the levels <strong>of</strong> amino<br />
acid neurotransmitters in the hippocampus <strong>of</strong> rat: Implication <strong>of</strong> monoterpene hydrocarbons. Pharmacol.<br />
Res., 55(4): 255–262.<br />
Morteza-Semnani, K; M. Mahmoudi, <strong>and</strong> G. Riahi, 2007. Effects <strong>of</strong> essential oil <strong>and</strong> extracts from certain<br />
Thymus species on swimming performance in mice. Pharm. Biol., 45(6): 464–467.<br />
Moss, M., J. Cook, K. Wesnes, <strong>and</strong> P. Duckett, 2003. Aromas <strong>of</strong> rosemary <strong>and</strong> lavender essential oils differentially<br />
affect cognition <strong>and</strong> mood in healthy adults. Int. J. Neurosci., 113(1): 15–38.<br />
Moss, M., S. Hewitt, L. Moss, <strong>and</strong> K. Wesnes, 2008. Modulation <strong>of</strong> cognitive performance <strong>and</strong> mood by aromas<br />
<strong>of</strong> peppermint <strong>and</strong> ylang–ylang. Int. J. Neurosci., 118(1):5 9–77.<br />
Mukherjee, P.K., V. Kumar, M. Mal, <strong>and</strong> P.J. Houghton, 2007. Acorus calamus: Scientific validation <strong>of</strong><br />
Ayurvedic tradition from natural resources. Pharm. Biol., 45(8): 651–666.<br />
Nakagawa, M., H. Nagai, <strong>and</strong> T. Inui, 1992. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> drowsiness by EEGs. Odors controlling drowsiness.<br />
Flav. Fragr J., 20(10): 68–72.<br />
Narusuye, K., F. Kawai, K. Mtsuzaki, <strong>and</strong> E. Miyachi, 2005. Linalool suppresses voltage-gated currents in<br />
sensory neurons <strong>and</strong> cerebellar Purkinje cells. J. Neural Transmission, 112: 193–203.<br />
Nasel, C., B. Nasel, P. Samec, E. Schindler, <strong>and</strong> G. Buchbauer, 1994. Functional imaging <strong>of</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> fragrances<br />
on the human brain after prolonged inhalation. Chem. Senses, 19(4): 359–364.<br />
Norte, M.C., R.M. Cosentino, <strong>and</strong> C.A. Lazarini, 2005. Effects <strong>of</strong> methyleugenol administration on behavior<br />
models related to depression <strong>and</strong> anxiety in rats. Phytomedicine, 12(4): 294–298.<br />
Oken, B.S., M.C. Salinsky, <strong>and</strong> S.M. Elsas, 2006. Vigilance, alertness, or sustained attention: Physiological<br />
basis <strong>and</strong> measurement. Clin. Neurophysiol., 117(9): 1885–1901.<br />
Okugawa, H., R. Ueda, K. Matsumoto, K. Kawanishi, <strong>and</strong> K. Kato, 2000. Effects <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenoids from<br />
“oriental incenses” on acetic acid-induced writhing <strong>and</strong> D 2 <strong>and</strong> 5-HT 2A receptors in rat brain.<br />
Phytomedicine, 7(5): 417–422.<br />
Orafidiya, L.O., E.O. Agbani, E.O. Iwalewa, K.A. Adelusola, <strong>and</strong> O.O. Oyedapo, 2004. Studies on the acute<br />
<strong>and</strong> sub-chronic toxicity <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Ocimum gratissimum L. leaf. Phytomedicine, 11: 71–76.<br />
Palva, S. <strong>and</strong> J.M. Palva, 2007. New vistas for [alpha]-frequency b<strong>and</strong> oscillations. Trends Neurosci., 30(4):<br />
150–158.<br />
Paus, T., 2001. Primate anterior cingulate cortex: Where motor control, drive <strong>and</strong> cognition interface. Nat. Rev.<br />
Neurosci., 2(6): 417–424.<br />
Peana, A.T., P.S. D’Aquila, F. Panin, et al., 2002. Anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> linalool <strong>and</strong> linalyl acetate<br />
constituents <strong>of</strong> essential oils. Phytomedicine, 9(8): 721–726.<br />
Peana, A.T., P.S. D’Aquila, M.L. Chessa, et al., 2003. (-)-Linalool produces antinociception in two experimental<br />
models <strong>of</strong> pain. Eur. J. Pharmacol., 460: 37–41.
312 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Peana, A.T., M.G. De Montis, E. Nieddu, et al., 2004a. Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> spinal <strong>and</strong> supra-spinal antinociception <strong>of</strong><br />
(-)-linalool. Eur. J. Pharmacol., 485:165–174.<br />
Peana, A.T., M.G. De Montis, S. Sechi, et al., 2004b. Effects <strong>of</strong> (−)-linalool in the acute hyperalgesia induced<br />
by carrageenan, l-glutamate <strong>and</strong> prostagl<strong>and</strong>in E2. Eur. J. Pharmacol., 497(3): 279–284.<br />
Peana, A.T., P. Rubattu, G.G. Piga, et al., 2006. Involvement <strong>of</strong> adenosine A1 <strong>and</strong> A2A receptors in (-)-linalool-<br />
induced antinociception. Life Sci., 78: 2471–2474.<br />
Perry, N. <strong>and</strong> E. Perry, 2006. Aromatherapy in the management <strong>of</strong> psychiatric disorders: Clinical <strong>and</strong> neuropharmacological<br />
perspectives. CNS Drugs, 20(4): 257–280.<br />
Pedersen, C.A., B.N. Gaynes, R.N. Golden, D.L. Evans, <strong>and</strong> J.J.J. Haggerty, 1998. Neurobiological aspects <strong>of</strong><br />
behavior. In: Human Behavior: An Introduction for Medical Students, A. Stoudemire, ed. Philadelphia,<br />
New York: Lippincott-Raven Publishers.<br />
Perry, N.S., P.J. Hougthon, J. Sampson, et al., 2001. In-vitro activity <strong>of</strong> S. lav<strong>and</strong>ulaefolia (Spanish sage) relevant<br />
to treatment <strong>of</strong> Alzheimer’s disease. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 53(10): 1347–1356.<br />
Perry, N.S., P.J. Hougthon, P. Jenner, A. Keith, <strong>and</strong> E.K. Perry, 2002. Salvia lav<strong>and</strong>ulaefolia essential oil inhibits<br />
cholinesterase in vivo. Phytomedicine, 9(1): 48–51.<br />
Phan, K.L., T. Wager, S.F. Taylor, <strong>and</strong> I. Liberzon, 2002. Functional neuroanatomy <strong>of</strong> emotion: A meta-analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> emotion activation studies in PET <strong>and</strong> fMRI. Neuroimage, 16(2): 331–348.<br />
Pourgholami, M.H., M. Kamalinejad, M. Javadi, S. Majzoob, <strong>and</strong> M. Sayyah, 1999a. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the anticonvulsant<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Eugenia caryophyllata in male mice. J. Ethnopharmacol., 64:<br />
167–171.<br />
Pourgholami, M.H., S. Majzoob, M. Javadi, et al., 1999b. The fruit essential oil <strong>of</strong> Pimpinella anisum exerts<br />
anticonvulsant effects in mice. J. Ethnopharmacol., 66(2): 211–215.<br />
Posner, M.I. <strong>and</strong> S.E. Petersen, 1990. The attention system <strong>of</strong> the human brain. Ann. Rev. Neurosci., 13: 25–42.<br />
Posner, M.I. <strong>and</strong> R.D. Rafal, 1987. Cognitive theories <strong>of</strong> attention <strong>and</strong> the rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> attentional deficits.<br />
In: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, M.J. Meier, A.L. Benton, <strong>and</strong> L. Diller, eds. London: Churchill-<br />
Livingston.<br />
Pribram, K.H. <strong>and</strong> D. McGuinness, 1975. Arousal, activation, <strong>and</strong> effort in the control <strong>of</strong> attention. Psychol.<br />
Rev., 82(2): 116–149.<br />
Pultrini, A.M., L.A. Galindo, <strong>and</strong> M. Costa, 2006. Effects <strong>of</strong> essential oil from Citrus aurantium L. in experimental<br />
anxiety models in mice. Life Sci., 78:1720–1725.<br />
Quintans-Júnior, L.J., T.T. Souza, B.S. Leite, et al., 2008. Phythochemical screening <strong>and</strong> anticonvulsant activity<br />
<strong>of</strong> Cymbopogon winterianus Jowitt (Poaceae) leaf essential oil in rodents. Phytomedicine, 15(8):<br />
619–624.<br />
Rasch, B., C. Buchel, S. Gais, <strong>and</strong> J. Born, 2007. Odor cues during slow-wave sleep prompt declarative memory<br />
consolidation. <strong>Science</strong>, 315(5817): 1426–1429.<br />
Razumnikova, O.M., 2007. Creativity related cortex activity in the remote associates task. Brain Res. Bull.,<br />
73(1–3): 96–102.<br />
Reiman, E.M., R.D. Lane, G.L. Ahern, et al., 1997. Neuroanatomical correlates <strong>of</strong> externally <strong>and</strong> internally<br />
generated human emotion. Am. J. Psychiatry, 154(7): 918–925.<br />
Sadraei, H., A. Ghannadi, <strong>and</strong> K. Malekshahi, 2003. Relaxant effect <strong>of</strong> essential oil <strong>of</strong> Melissa <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis <strong>and</strong><br />
citral on rat ileum contractions. Fitoterapia, 74: 445–452.<br />
Sakamoto, R., K. Minoura, A. Usui, Y. Ishizuka, <strong>and</strong> S. Kanba, 2005. Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> aroma on work efficiency:<br />
Lavender aroma during recesses prevents deterioration <strong>of</strong> work performance. Chem. Senses,<br />
30(8): 683–691.<br />
Satoh, T. <strong>and</strong> Y. Sugawara, 2003. Effects on humans elicited by inhaling the fragrance <strong>of</strong> essential oils: Sensory<br />
test, multi-channel thermometric study <strong>and</strong> forehead surface potential wave measurement on basil <strong>and</strong><br />
peppermint. Anal. Sci., 19(1): 139–146.<br />
Sawada, K., R. Komaki, Y. Yamashita, <strong>and</strong> Y. Suzuki, 2000. Odor in forest <strong>and</strong> its physiological effects. Aroma<br />
Res., 1(3): 67–71.<br />
Sayyah, M., J. Valizadehl, <strong>and</strong> M. Kamalinejad, 2002. Anticonvulsant activity <strong>of</strong> the leaf essential oil <strong>of</strong> Laurus<br />
nobilis against pentylenetetrazole- <strong>and</strong> maximal electroshock-induced seizures. Phytomedicine, 9:<br />
212–216.<br />
Sayyah, M., L. Nadjafnia, <strong>and</strong> M. Kamalinejad, 2004. Anticonvulsant activity <strong>and</strong> chemical composition <strong>of</strong><br />
Artemisia dracunculus L. essential oil. J. Etnopharmacol., 94: 283–287.<br />
Sch<strong>and</strong>ry, R., 1989. Lehrbuch der Psychophysiologie. 2. Auflage. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.<br />
Shaw, D., J.M. Annett, B. Doherty, <strong>and</strong> J.C. Leslle, 2007. Anxiolytic effects <strong>of</strong> lavender oil inhalation on openfield<br />
behaviour in rats. Phytomedicine, 14(9): 613–620.
Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in the Central Nervous System 313<br />
Shibata, H., R. Fujiwara, M. Iwamoto, H. Matsuoka, <strong>and</strong> M.M. Yokoyama, 1990. Recovery <strong>of</strong> PFC in mice<br />
exposed to high pressure stress by olfactory stimulation with fragrance. Int. J. Neurosci., 51: 245–247.<br />
Silva, M.I., M.R. Aquino Neto, P.F. Teixeira Neto, et al., 2007. Central nervous system activity <strong>of</strong> acute administration<br />
<strong>of</strong> isopulegol in mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 88: 141–147.<br />
Sturm, W., 1997. Aufmerksamkeitsstoerungen. In: Klinische Neuropsychologie, W. Hartje <strong>and</strong> K. Poeck, eds.<br />
Stuttgart: Thieme.<br />
Sturm, W., A. de Simone, B.J. Krause, et al., 1999. Functional anatomy <strong>of</strong> intrinsic alertness: Evidence for<br />
a fronto-parietal-thalamic-brainstem network in the right hemisphere. Neuropsychologia, 37(7):<br />
797–805.<br />
Sugano, H., 1992. Psychophysiological studies <strong>of</strong> fragrance. In Fragrance: The Psychology <strong>and</strong> Biology <strong>of</strong><br />
Perfume, S. Van Toller <strong>and</strong> G.H. Dodd, eds. Barking: Elsevier <strong>Science</strong> Publishers Ltd.<br />
Sugawara, Y., C. Hara, K. Tamura, et al., 1998. Sedative effect on humans <strong>of</strong> inhalation <strong>of</strong> linalool: Sensory<br />
evaluation <strong>and</strong> physiological measurements using optically active linalools. Anal. Chim. Acta, 365:<br />
293–299.<br />
Sugawara, Y., C. Hara, T. Aoki, N. Sugimoto, <strong>and</strong> T. Masujima, 2000. Odor distinctiveness between enantiomers<br />
<strong>of</strong> linalool: Difference in perception <strong>and</strong> responses elicited by sensory test <strong>and</strong> forehead surface potential<br />
wave measurement. Chem. Senses, 25(1): 77–84.<br />
Sullivan, T.E., J.S. Warm, B.K. Schefft, et al., 1998. Effects <strong>of</strong> olfactory stimulation on the vigilance performance<br />
<strong>of</strong> individuals with brain injury. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol., 20(2): 227–236.<br />
Tecce, J.J., 1972. Contingent negative variation (CNV) <strong>and</strong> psychological processes in man. Psychol. Bull.,<br />
77(2): 73–108.<br />
Tildesley, N.T. J., D.O. Kennedy, E.K. Perry, et al., 2005. Positive modulation <strong>of</strong> mood <strong>and</strong> cognitive performance<br />
following administration <strong>of</strong> acute doses <strong>of</strong> Salvia lav<strong>and</strong>ulaefolia essential oil to healthy young<br />
volunteers. Physiol. Behav., 83(5): 699–709.<br />
Torii, S., H. Fukada, H. Kanemoto, et al., 1988. Contingent negative variation (CNV) <strong>and</strong> the psychological<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> odour. In: Perfumery—The Psychology <strong>and</strong> Biology <strong>of</strong> Fragrance, S. Van Toller <strong>and</strong> G.H. Dodd,<br />
eds. London New York: Chapman & Hall.<br />
Travis, F. <strong>and</strong> J.J. Tecce, 1998. Effects <strong>of</strong> distracting stimuli on CNV amplitude <strong>and</strong> reaction time. Int.<br />
J. Psychophysiol., 31(1): 45–50.<br />
Umezu, T., Anticonflict effects <strong>of</strong> plant-derived essential oils. 1999. Pharmacol., Biochem. Behav., 64: 35–40.<br />
Umezu, T., H. Ito, K. Nagano, et al., 2002. Anticonflict effects <strong>of</strong> rose oil <strong>and</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> its active constituents.<br />
Life Sci., 72: 91–102.<br />
Umezu, T., K. Nagano, H. Ito, et al., 2006. Anticonflict effects <strong>of</strong> lavender oil <strong>and</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> its active<br />
constituents. Pharmacol. Biochem/ Behav., 85(4): 713–721.<br />
Vale, T.G., F.J.A. Matos, T.C. Lima, <strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> G.S.B. Viana, 1999. Behavioral effects <strong>of</strong> essential oils from<br />
Lippia alba (Mill.) N.E. Brown chemotypes. J. Ethnopharmacol., 67: 127–33.<br />
Vale, T.G., E.C. Furtado, J.G. Santos Jr., <strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> G.S.B. Viana, 2002. Central effects <strong>of</strong> citral, myrcene <strong>and</strong><br />
limonene, constituents <strong>of</strong> essential oil chemotypes from Lippia alba (Mill.) N.E. Brown. Phytomedicine,<br />
9: 709–14.<br />
Valnet, J., 1990. The Practice <strong>of</strong> Aromatherapy. Rochester: Inner Traditions.<br />
Van Toller, S., J. Behan, P. Howells, M. Kendal-Reed, <strong>and</strong> A. Richardson, 1993. An analysis <strong>of</strong> spontaneous<br />
human cortical EEG activity to odors. Chem. Senses, 18(1): 1–16.<br />
Vieira, R.F., R.J. Grayer, A. Paton, <strong>and</strong> J.E. Simon, 2001. Genetic diversity <strong>of</strong> Ocimum gratissimum L. based<br />
on volatile oil constituents, flavonoids <strong>and</strong> RAPD markers. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 29: 287–304.<br />
Viana, G.S.B., T.G. Vale, <strong>and</strong> F.J.A. Matos, 2000. Anticonvulsant activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> active principles<br />
from chemotypes <strong>of</strong> Lippia alba (Mill.) N.E. Brown. Biol. Pharm. Bull., 23: 1314–1317.<br />
Vohora, S.B., S.A. Shah, <strong>and</strong> P.C. D<strong>and</strong>iya, 1990. Central nervous system studies on an ethanol extract <strong>of</strong><br />
Acorus calamus rhizomes. J. Ethnopharmacol., 28: 53–62.<br />
Walla, P., B. Hufnagl, J. Lehrner, et al., 2002. Evidence <strong>of</strong> conscious <strong>and</strong> subconscious olfactory information<br />
processing during word encoding: A magnetoencephalographic (MEG) study. Brain Res. Cognitive Brain<br />
Res., 14(3): 309–316.<br />
Walla, P., B. Hufnagl, J. Lehrner, et al., 2003a. Olfaction <strong>and</strong> depth <strong>of</strong> word processing: A magnetoencephalographic<br />
study. Neuroimage, 18(1): 104–116.<br />
Walla, P., B. Hufnagl, J. Lehrner, et al., 2003b. Olfaction <strong>and</strong> face encoding in humans: A magnetoencephalographic<br />
study. Brain Res. Cognitive Brain Res., 15(2): 105–115.<br />
Walla, P., D. Mayer, L. Deecke, <strong>and</strong> W. Lang, 2005. How chemical information processing interferes with face<br />
processing: A magnetoencephalographic study. Neuroimage, 24(1): 111–117.
314 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Walschburger, P., 1976. Zur Beschreibung von Aktivierungsprozessen: Eine Methodenstudie zur psychophysiologischen<br />
Diagnostik. Dissertation, Philosophische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg<br />
(Breisgau).<br />
Walter, W.G., R. Cooper, V.J. Aldridge, W.C. McCallum, <strong>and</strong> A.L. Winter, 1964. Contingent negative variation:<br />
An electric sign <strong>of</strong> sensorimotor association <strong>and</strong> expectancy in the human brain. Nature, 203: 380–384.<br />
Warm, J.S., W.N. Dember, <strong>and</strong> R. Parasuraman, 1991. Effects <strong>of</strong> olfactory stimulation on performance <strong>and</strong><br />
stress in a visual sustained attention task. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem., 42: 199–210.<br />
Wie, M.B., M.H. Won, K.H. Lee, et al., 1997. Eugenol protects neuronal cells form excitotoxic <strong>and</strong> oxidative<br />
injury in primary cortical cultures. Neurosci. Lett., 225: 93–96.<br />
Wiesmann, M., I. Yousry, E. Heuberger, et al., 2001. Functional magnetic resonance imaging <strong>of</strong> human olfaction.<br />
Neuroimaging Clin. North Am., 11(2): 237–250.<br />
Will<strong>and</strong>er, J. <strong>and</strong> M. Larsson, 2007. Olfaction <strong>and</strong> emotion: The case <strong>of</strong> autobiographical memory. Memory<br />
Cognit., 35(7): 1659–1663.<br />
Won, M.H., K.H. Lee, Y.H. Kim, et al., 1998. Postischemic hypothermia induced by eugenol protects hippocampal<br />
neurons form global ischemia in gerbils. Neurosci. Lett., 254: 101–104.<br />
Yagyu, T., 1994. Neurophysiological findings on the effects <strong>of</strong> fragrance: Lavender <strong>and</strong> jasmine. Integrative<br />
Psychiatry, 10: 62–67.<br />
Ye, H., J. Ji, C. Deng, et al., 2006. Rapid analysis <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Acorus tatarinowii Schott by microwave<br />
distillation, SPME, <strong>and</strong> GC-MS. Chromatographia, 63: 591–594.<br />
Zhang, H., T. Han, C.H. Yu, et al., 2007. Ameliorating effects <strong>of</strong> essential oil from Acori graminei rhizoma on<br />
learning <strong>and</strong> memory in aged rats <strong>and</strong> mice. J. Pharmacy Pharmacol., 59(2): 301–309.<br />
Zilles, K. <strong>and</strong> G. Rehkämpfer, 1998. Funktionelle Neuroanatomie. 3. Auflage. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York:<br />
Springer.<br />
Zimbardo, P.G., A.L. Weber, <strong>and</strong> R.L. Hohnson, 2003. Psychology—Core Concepts, 4th ed. Boston: Allyn <strong>and</strong><br />
Bacon.
11<br />
Phytotherapeutic Uses <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Bob Harris<br />
CONTENTS<br />
11.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 316<br />
11.2 Acaricidal activity ........................................................................................................... 316<br />
11.3 Anticarcinogenic ............................................................................................................. 317<br />
11.4 Antimicrobial .................................................................................................................. 317<br />
11.4.1 Antibacterial .................................................................................................... 317<br />
11.4.1.1 Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ............................... 318<br />
11.4.2 Antifungal ........................................................................................................ 318<br />
11.4.3 Antiviral .......................................................................................................... 319<br />
11.4.4 Microbes <strong>of</strong> the Oral Cavity ............................................................................ 320<br />
11.4.4.1 Activity <strong>of</strong> Listerine against Plaque <strong>and</strong>/or Gingivitis ................... 321<br />
11.4.4.2 Antiviral Listerine ........................................................................... 321<br />
11.4.4.3 Activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> ................................................................ 321<br />
11.4.5 Controlling Micr<strong>of</strong>lora in Atopic Dermatitis .................................................. 323<br />
11.4.6 Odor Management for Fungating Wounds ...................................................... 323<br />
11.5 Dissolution <strong>of</strong> Hepatic <strong>and</strong> Renal Stones ........................................................................ 323<br />
11.5.1 Gall <strong>and</strong> Biliary Tract Stones .......................................................................... 323<br />
11.5.2 Renal Stones .................................................................................................... 325<br />
11.6 Functional Dyspepsia ...................................................................................................... 325<br />
11.7 Gastroesophageal reflux .................................................................................................. 326<br />
11.8 Hyperlipoproteinemia ..................................................................................................... 326<br />
11.9 Irritable Bowel Syndrome ............................................................................................... 327<br />
11.10 Medical Examinations .................................................................................................... 328<br />
11.11 Nausea ............................................................................................................................. 329<br />
11.12 Pain Relief ....................................................................................................................... 329<br />
11.12.1 Dysmenorrhea .................................................................................................. 330<br />
11.12.2 Headache ......................................................................................................... 330<br />
11.12.3 Infantile Colic .................................................................................................. 331<br />
11.12.4 Joint Physiotherapy .......................................................................................... 331<br />
11.12.5 Nipple Pain ...................................................................................................... 331<br />
11.12.6 Osteoarthritis ................................................................................................... 331<br />
11.12.7 Postherpetic Neuralgia .................................................................................... 331<br />
11.12.8 Postoperative Pain ........................................................................................... 332<br />
11.12.9 Prostatitis ......................................................................................................... 332<br />
11.12.10 Pruritis ............................................................................................................. 332<br />
11.13 Pediculicidal Activity ...................................................................................................... 332<br />
11.14 Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis ....................................................................................... 333<br />
315
316 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
11.15 Respiratory Tract ............................................................................................................. 333<br />
11.15.1 Menthol ............................................................................................................ 333<br />
11.15.1.1 Antitussive ....................................................................................... 334<br />
11.15.1.2 Nasal Decongestant ......................................................................... 334<br />
11.15.1.3 Inhibition <strong>of</strong> Respiratory Drive<br />
<strong>and</strong> Respiratory Comfort ................................................................ 335<br />
11.15.1.4 Bronchodilation <strong>and</strong> Airway Hyperresponsiveness ........................ 335<br />
11.15.1.5 Summary ......................................................................................... 336<br />
11.15.2 1,8-Cineole ...................................................................................................... 336<br />
11.15.2.1 Antimicrobial .................................................................................. 336<br />
11.15.2.2 Antitussive ....................................................................................... 337<br />
11.15.2.3 Bronchodilation ............................................................................... 337<br />
11.15.2.4 Mucolytic <strong>and</strong> Mucociliary Effects ................................................ 337<br />
11.15.2.5 Anti-Inflammatory Activity ............................................................ 338<br />
11.15.2.6 Pulmonary Function ........................................................................ 339<br />
11.15.2.7 Summary ......................................................................................... 341<br />
11.15.3 Treatment with Blends Containing both Menthol <strong>and</strong> 1,8-Cineole ................ 341<br />
11.16 Allergic Rhinitis .............................................................................................................. 342<br />
11.17 Snoring ............................................................................................................................ 342<br />
11.18 Swallowing Dysfunction ................................................................................................. 342<br />
11.19 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 343<br />
References .................................................................................................................................. 343<br />
11.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
For many, the term “aromatherapy” originally became associated with the concept <strong>of</strong> the holistic<br />
use <strong>of</strong> essential oils to promote health <strong>and</strong> well-being. As time has progressed <strong>and</strong> the psychophysiological<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> essential oils have been explored further, their uses to reduce anxiety <strong>and</strong> aid<br />
sedation have also become associated with the term. This is especially so since the therapy has<br />
moved into the field <strong>of</strong> nursing, where such activities are <strong>of</strong> obvious benefit to patients in a hospital<br />
environment. More importantly, the practice <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy (in English-speaking countries) is<br />
firmly linked to the inhalation <strong>of</strong> small doses <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> their application to the skin in<br />
high dilution as part <strong>of</strong> an aromatherapy massage.<br />
This chapter is concerned with the medical use <strong>of</strong> essential oils, given to the patient by all routes<br />
<strong>of</strong> administration to treat specific conditions <strong>and</strong> in comparably concentrated amounts. Studies that<br />
use essential oils in an aromatherapy-like manner, for example, to treat anxiety by essential oil massage,<br />
are therefore excluded here.<br />
Of the literature published in peer-reviewed journals over the last 30 years, only a small percentage<br />
concerns the administration <strong>of</strong> essential oils or their components to humans in order to treat<br />
disease processes. These reports are listed below in alphabetical order <strong>of</strong> their activity. The exception<br />
is the section on the respiratory tract, where the many activities <strong>of</strong> the two principal components<br />
(menthol <strong>and</strong> 1,8-cineole) are discussed <strong>and</strong> related to respiratory pathologies.<br />
All <strong>of</strong> the references cited are from peer-reviewed publications; a minority is open to debate<br />
regarding methodology <strong>and</strong>/or interpretation <strong>of</strong> results, but this is not the purpose <strong>of</strong> this compilation.<br />
Reports <strong>of</strong> individual case studies have been omitted.<br />
11.2 ACARICIDAL ACTIVITY<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> essential oils have been found to have effective acaricidal activity against infections in<br />
the animal world. Recent examples include Origanum onites against cattle ticks (Coskun et al.,
Phytotherapeutic Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 317<br />
2008) <strong>and</strong> Cinnamomum zeylanicum against rabbit mange mites (Fichi et al., 2007). In comparison<br />
to veterinary research, there have been few investigations into human acaricidal infections.<br />
The scabies mite, Sarcoptes scabiei var. hominis, is becoming increasingly resistant to existing<br />
acaricidal compounds such as lindane, benzyl benzoate, permethrin, <strong>and</strong> oral ivermectin. The<br />
potential use <strong>of</strong> a 5% Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil solution to treat scabies infections was<br />
investigated in vitro. It was found to be highly effective at reducing mite survival times <strong>and</strong> the main<br />
active component was terpinen-4-ol. However, the in vivo effectiveness was only tested on one<br />
individual, in combination with benzyl benzoate <strong>and</strong> ivermectin (Walton et al., 2004).<br />
A double-blind, r<strong>and</strong>omized, parallel group study was used to compare the effects <strong>of</strong> 25% w/w<br />
benzyl benzoate emulsion with 20% w/w Lippia multifl ora essential oil emulsion in the treatment<br />
<strong>of</strong> scabies infection in 105 patients. Applied daily, the cure rates for the oil emulsion were 50%,<br />
80%, <strong>and</strong> 80% for 3, 5, <strong>and</strong> 7 days, respectively, compared to 30%, 60%, <strong>and</strong> 70% for the benzyl<br />
benzoate emulsion. There were also less adverse reactions to the oil emulsion, leading it to be<br />
considered as an additional formulation for the treatment <strong>of</strong> scabies (Oladimeji et al., 2005).<br />
Although not an infection, the lethal activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils toward the house dust mite<br />
(Dermatophagoides farina <strong>and</strong> Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) is important as these mites are a<br />
major cause <strong>of</strong> respiratory allergies <strong>and</strong> an etiologic agent in the sensitization <strong>and</strong> triggering <strong>of</strong><br />
asthma in children. Numerous studies have been conducted, including the successful inclusion <strong>of</strong><br />
Eucalyptus globulus in blanket washing solutions (Tovey <strong>and</strong> McDonald, 1997), the high acaricidal<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> clove, rosemary, eucalyptus, <strong>and</strong> caraway (El-Zemity et al., 2006), <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> tea tree <strong>and</strong><br />
lavender (Williamson et al., 2007).<br />
11.3 ANTICARCINOGENIC<br />
Despite the popularity <strong>of</strong> in vitro experimentation concerning the cellular mechanisms <strong>of</strong> carcinogenic<br />
prevention by essential oil components (mainly by inducing apoptosis), there is no evidence<br />
that the direct administration <strong>of</strong> essential oils can cure cancer. There is evidence to suggest that the<br />
mevalonate pathway <strong>of</strong> cancer cells is sensitive to the inhibitory actions <strong>of</strong> dietary plant isoprenoids<br />
(e.g., Elson <strong>and</strong> Yu, 1994; Duncan et al., 2005). Animal testing has shown that some components<br />
can cause a significant reduction in the incidence <strong>of</strong> chemically induced cancers when administered<br />
before <strong>and</strong> during induction (e.g., Reddy et al., 1997; Uedo et al., 1999).<br />
Phase II clinical trials have all involved perillyl alcohol. Results demonstrated that despite<br />
preclinical evidence, there appeared to be no anticarcinogenic activity in cases <strong>of</strong> advanced ovarian<br />
cancer (Bailey et al., 2002), metastatic colorectal cancer (Meadows et al., 2002), <strong>and</strong> metastatic<br />
breast cancer (Bailey et al., 2008). Only one trial has demonstrated antitumor activity as evidenced<br />
by a reduction <strong>of</strong> tumor size in patients with recurrent malignant gliomas (Orl<strong>and</strong>o da<br />
Fonseca et al., 2008).<br />
11.4 ANTIMICROBIAL<br />
Considering that the majority <strong>of</strong> essential oil research is directed toward antimicrobial activity,<br />
there is a surprising lack <strong>of</strong> corresponding in vivo human trials. This is disappointing since the topical<br />
<strong>and</strong> systemic application <strong>of</strong> essential oils to treat infection is a widespread practice among therapists<br />
with (apparently) good results.<br />
11.4.1 ANTIBACTERIAL<br />
Antibiotics that affect Propionibacterium acnes are a st<strong>and</strong>ard treatment for acne but antibiotic<br />
resistance is becoming prevalent. A preliminary study <strong>of</strong> 126 patients showed that topical 2% essential<br />
oil <strong>of</strong> Ocimum gratissimum (thymol chemotype) in a hydrophilic cream base was more effective<br />
than 10% benzyl peroxide lotion at reducing the number <strong>of</strong> lesions when applied twice daily for<br />
4 weeks (Orafidiya et al., 2002).
318 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
In a r<strong>and</strong>omized, single-blind, parallel-group-controlled trial, the same group examined the<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> the addition <strong>of</strong> aloe vera gel at varying concentrations to the Ocimum gratissimum cream<br />
<strong>and</strong> compared its activity with 1% clindamycin phosphate. In the 84 patients with significant acne,<br />
it was found that increasing the aloe gel content improved efficacy; the essential oil preparations<br />
formulated with undiluted or 50% aloe gels were more effective at reducing lesions than the reference<br />
product. The aloe vera gels alone had minimal activity (Orafidiya et al., 2004).<br />
A later report judged the efficacy <strong>of</strong> a 5% Melaleuca alternifolia gel in the amelioration <strong>of</strong> mild<br />
to moderate acne, since a previous study (Raman et al., 1995) had demonstrated the effectiveness<br />
<strong>of</strong> tea tree oil components against Propionibacterium acnes. The r<strong>and</strong>omized, double-blind,<br />
placebo-controlled trial used 60 patients who were given the tea tree oil gel or the gel alone twice<br />
daily for 45 days. The total acne lesion count was significantly reduced by 43.64% <strong>and</strong> the acne<br />
severity index was significantly reduced by 40.49% after the tea tree oil treatment, as compared to<br />
the placebo scores <strong>of</strong> 12.03% <strong>and</strong> 7.04%, respectively (Enshaieh et al., 2007).<br />
11.4.1.1 Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> papers have demonstrated the in vitro effects <strong>of</strong> various essential oils against methicillinresistant<br />
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA); for example, Lippia origanoides (Dos Santos et al., 2004),<br />
Backhousia citriodora (Hayes <strong>and</strong> Markovic, 2002), Mentha piperita, Mentha arvensis, <strong>and</strong> Mentha<br />
spicata (Imai et al., 2001), <strong>and</strong> Melaleuca alternifolia (Carson et al., 1995). There have been no trials<br />
involving the use <strong>of</strong> essential oils to combat active MRSA infections, although there have been two<br />
studies involving the use <strong>of</strong> tea tree oil as a topical decolonization agent for MRSA carriers.<br />
A pilot study compared the use <strong>of</strong> 2% mupirocin nasal ointment <strong>and</strong> triclosan body wash (routine<br />
care) with 4% Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil nasal ointment <strong>and</strong> 5% tea tree oil body wash in<br />
30 MRSA patients. The interventions lasted for a minimum <strong>of</strong> 3 days <strong>and</strong> screening for MRSA was<br />
undertaken at 48 <strong>and</strong> 96 h post-treatment from sites previously colonized by the bacteria. There was<br />
no correlation between length <strong>of</strong> treatment <strong>and</strong> outcome in either group. Of the tea tree oil group,<br />
33% were initially cleared <strong>of</strong> MRSA carriage while 20% remained chronically infected at the end<br />
<strong>of</strong> the treatment; this was in comparison with routine care group <strong>of</strong> 13% <strong>and</strong> 53%, respectively. The<br />
trial was too small to provide significant results (Caelli et al., 2000).<br />
A r<strong>and</strong>omized, controlled trial compared the use <strong>of</strong> a st<strong>and</strong>ard regime for MRSA decolonization<br />
with Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil. The 5-day study involved 236 patients. The st<strong>and</strong>ard treatment<br />
group was given 2% mupirocin nasal ointment thrice daily, 4% chlorhexidine gluconate soap<br />
as a body wash once daily, <strong>and</strong> 1% silver sulfadiazine cream for skin lesions, wounds, <strong>and</strong> leg ulcers<br />
once daily. The tea tree oil group received 10% essential oil cream thrice daily to the nostrils <strong>and</strong> to<br />
specific skin sites <strong>and</strong> 5% essential oil body wash at least once daily. In the tea tree oil group, 41%<br />
were cleared <strong>of</strong> MRSA as compared to 49% using the st<strong>and</strong>ard regime; this was not a significant<br />
difference. Tea tree oil cream was significantly less effective at clearing nasal carriage than mupirocin<br />
(47% compared to 78%), but was more effective at clearing superficial sites than chlorhexidine<br />
or silver sulfadiazine (Dryden et al., 2004).<br />
11.4.2 ANTIFUNGAL<br />
The essential oil <strong>of</strong> Citrus aurantium var. amara was used to treat 60 patients with tinea corporis,<br />
cruris, or pedis. One group received a 25% bitter orange (BO) oil emulsion thrice daily, a second<br />
group was treated with 20% bitter orange oil in alcohol (BOa) thrice daily, <strong>and</strong> a third group used<br />
undiluted BO oil once daily. The trial lasted for 4 weeks <strong>and</strong> clinical <strong>and</strong> mycological examinations<br />
were performed every week until cure, which was defined as an elimination <strong>of</strong> signs <strong>and</strong> symptoms.<br />
In the BO group, 80% <strong>of</strong> patients were cured in 1–2 weeks <strong>and</strong> the rest within 2–3 weeks. By using<br />
BOa, 50% <strong>of</strong> patients were cured in 1–2 weeks, 30% in 2–3 weeks, <strong>and</strong> 20% in 3–4 weeks. With the<br />
undiluted essential oil, 25% <strong>of</strong> patients did not continue treatment, 33.3% were cured in 1 week,<br />
60% in 1–2 weeks, <strong>and</strong> 6.7% in 2–3 weeks (Ramadan et al., 1996).
Phytotherapeutic Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 319<br />
A double-blind, r<strong>and</strong>omized, placebo-controlled trial investigated the efficacy <strong>of</strong> 2% butenafine<br />
hydrochloride cream with added 5% Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil in 60 patients with<br />
toenail onychomycosis. After 16 weeks, 80% <strong>of</strong> patients in the treatment group were cured, as<br />
opposed to none in the control group (Syed et al., 1999). However, butenafine hydrochloride is<br />
a potent antimycotic in itself <strong>and</strong> the results were not compared with this product when<br />
used alone.<br />
After an initial in vitro study, which showed that the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus paucifl ora had a<br />
strong fungicidal activity against Epidermophyton fl occosum, Microsporum canis, Microsporum<br />
nanum, Microsporum gypseum, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton<br />
tonsurans, <strong>and</strong> Trichophyton violaceum, an in vivo trial was commenced. Fifty patients with confirmed<br />
dermatophytosis were treated with 1% v/v essential oil twice daily for 3 weeks. At the end <strong>of</strong><br />
the treatment, a cure was demonstrated in 60% <strong>of</strong> patients with the remaining 40% showing significant<br />
improvement (Shahi et al., 2000).<br />
On the surmise that infection with Pityrosporum ovale is a major contributing factor to d<strong>and</strong>ruff<br />
<strong>and</strong> that anti-Pityrosporum drugs such as nystatin were proven effective treatments, the use <strong>of</strong> 5%<br />
Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil was investigated. In this r<strong>and</strong>omized, single-blind, parallel-group<br />
study tea tree oil shampoo or placebo shampoo was used daily for 4 weeks by 126 patients with mild<br />
to moderate d<strong>and</strong>ruff. In the treatment group, the d<strong>and</strong>ruff severity score showed an improvement <strong>of</strong><br />
41%, as compared to 11% in the placebo group. The area involvement <strong>and</strong> total severity scores also<br />
demonstrated a statistically significant improvement, as did itchiness <strong>and</strong> greasiness. Scaliness was<br />
not greatly affected. The condition resolved for one patient in each group <strong>and</strong> so ongoing application<br />
<strong>of</strong> tea tree oil shampoo was recommended for d<strong>and</strong>ruff control (Satchell et al., 2002a).<br />
For inclusion in a r<strong>and</strong>omized, double-blind, controlled trial, 158 patients with the clinical features<br />
<strong>of</strong> intertriginous tinea pedis <strong>and</strong> confirmed dermatophyte infection were recruited. They were<br />
administered 25% or 50% Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil (in an ethanol <strong>and</strong> polyethylene glycol<br />
vehicle) or the vehicle alone, twice daily for 4 weeks. There was an improvement in the clinical<br />
severity score, falling by 68% <strong>and</strong> 66% in the 25% <strong>and</strong> 50% tea tree oil groups, in comparison with<br />
41% for the placebo. There was an effective cure in the 25% <strong>and</strong> 50% tea tree oil <strong>and</strong> placebo groups<br />
<strong>of</strong> 48%, 50%, <strong>and</strong> 13%, respectively. The essential oil was less effective than st<strong>and</strong>ard topical treatments<br />
(Satchell et al., 2002b).<br />
The antic<strong>and</strong>ida properties <strong>of</strong> Zataria multifl ora essential oil <strong>and</strong> its active components (thymol,<br />
carvacrol, <strong>and</strong> eugenol) were demonstrated in vitro by Mahmoudabadi et al. (2006). A r<strong>and</strong>omized,<br />
clinical trial was conducted using 86 patients with acute vaginal c<strong>and</strong>idiasis. They were treated with<br />
a cream containing 0.1% Zataria multifl ora essential oil or 1% clotrimazole once daily for 7 days.<br />
Statistically significant decreases in vulvar pruritis (80.9%), vaginal pruritis (65.5%), vaginal<br />
burning (73.95), urinary burning (100%), <strong>and</strong> vaginal secretions (90%) were obtained by the essential<br />
oil treatment as compared to the clotrimazole treatment <strong>of</strong> 73.91%, 56.7%, 82.1%, 100%, <strong>and</strong><br />
70%, respectively. In addition, the Zataria multifl ora cream reduced erythema <strong>and</strong> satellite vulvar<br />
lesions in 100% <strong>of</strong> patients, vaginal edema in 100%, vaginal edema in 83.3%, <strong>and</strong> vulvo-vaginal<br />
excoriation <strong>and</strong> fissures in 92%. The corresponding results for clotrimazole were 100%, 100%, 76%,<br />
<strong>and</strong> 88%. In terms <strong>of</strong> overall efficacy, the rates <strong>of</strong> improvement were 90% <strong>and</strong> 74.8% for the Zataria<br />
multifl ora <strong>and</strong> clotrimazole groups, respectively. Use <strong>of</strong> the cream alone provided no significant<br />
changes (Khosravi et al., 2008).<br />
11.4.3 ANTIVIRAL<br />
The in vitro studies that have been conducted so far indicate that many essential oils possess antiviral<br />
properties, but they affect only enveloped viruses <strong>and</strong> only when they are in the free state, that is,<br />
before the virus is attached to, or has entered the host cell (e.g., Schnitzler et al., 2008). This is in<br />
contrast to the majority <strong>of</strong> synthetic antiviral agents, which either bar the complete penetration <strong>of</strong><br />
viral particles into the host cell or interfere with viral replication once the virus is inside the cell.
320 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
A r<strong>and</strong>omized, investigator-blinded, placebo-controlled trial used 6% Melaleuca alternifolia<br />
essential oil gel to treat recurrent herpes labialis. It was applied five times daily <strong>and</strong> continued until<br />
re-epithelialization occurred <strong>and</strong> the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Herpes simplex virus<br />
was negative for two consecutive days. The median time to re-epithelialization after treatment with<br />
tea tree oil was 9 days as compared to 12.5 days with the placebo, which is similar to reductions<br />
caused by other topical therapies. The median duration <strong>of</strong> PCR positivity was the same for both<br />
groups (6 days) although the viral titers appeared slightly lower in the oil group on days 3 <strong>and</strong> 4.<br />
None <strong>of</strong> the differences reached statistical significance, probably due to the small group size<br />
(Carson et al., 2001).<br />
Children below 5 years were enrolled in a r<strong>and</strong>omized trial to test a 10% v/v solution <strong>of</strong> the<br />
essential oil <strong>of</strong> Backhousia citriodora against molluscum contagiosum (caused by Molluscipoxvirus).<br />
Of the 31 patients, 16 were assigned to the treatment group <strong>and</strong> the rest to the control <strong>of</strong><br />
olive oil. The solutions were applied directly to the papules once daily at bedtime for 21 days or<br />
until the lesions had resolved. In the essential oil group, five children had a total resolution <strong>of</strong><br />
lesions <strong>and</strong> four had reductions <strong>of</strong> greater than 90% at the end <strong>of</strong> 21 days. In contrast, none <strong>of</strong> the<br />
control group had any resolution or reduction <strong>of</strong> lesions by the end <strong>of</strong> the study period (Burke<br />
et al., 2004).<br />
A study was conducted on 60 patients who were chronic carriers <strong>of</strong> hepatitis B or C. The essential<br />
oils <strong>of</strong> Cinnamomum camphora ct 1,8-cineole, Daucus carota, Ledum groel<strong>and</strong>icum, Laurus<br />
nobilis, Helichrysum italicum, Thymus vulgaris ct thujanol, <strong>and</strong> Melaleuca quinquenervia were<br />
used orally in various combinations. They were used as a monotherapy or as a complement to allopathic<br />
treatment. The objectives <strong>of</strong> treatment were normalization <strong>of</strong> transaminase levels, reduction<br />
<strong>of</strong> viral load, <strong>and</strong> stabilization or regression <strong>of</strong> fibrosis. There was an improvement <strong>of</strong> 100%, when<br />
patients with hepatitis C were given bitherapy with essential oils. With essential oil monotherapy,<br />
improvements were noted in 64% <strong>of</strong> patients with hepatitis C <strong>and</strong> there were two cures <strong>of</strong> hepatitis B<br />
(Giraud-Robert, 2005).<br />
11.4.4 MICROBES OF THE ORAL CAVITY<br />
The activities <strong>of</strong> essential oils against disease-producing microbes in the oral cavity have been<br />
documented separately because there are numerous reports <strong>of</strong> relevance. The easy administration <strong>of</strong><br />
essential oils in mouthrinses, gargles, <strong>and</strong> toothpastes, <strong>and</strong> the success <strong>of</strong> such commercial preparations,<br />
has no doubt led to the popularity <strong>of</strong> this research.<br />
The in vitro activities <strong>of</strong> essential oils against the oral micr<strong>of</strong>lora are well documented <strong>and</strong> these<br />
include effects on cariogenic <strong>and</strong> periodontopathic bacteria. One example is the in vitro activity <strong>of</strong><br />
Leptospermum scoparium, Melaleuca alternifolia, Eucalyptus radiata, Lav<strong>and</strong>ula <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis, <strong>and</strong><br />
Rosmarinus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans,<br />
Fusobacterium nucleatum, <strong>and</strong> Streptococcus mutans. The essential oils inhibited all <strong>of</strong> the test<br />
bacteria, acting bactericidally except for Lav<strong>and</strong>ula <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis. In addition, significant adhesioninhibiting<br />
activity was shown against Streptococcus mutans by all essential oils <strong>and</strong> against<br />
Porphyromonas gingivalis by tea tree <strong>and</strong> manuka (Takarada et al., 2004).<br />
There have been at least six in vivo studies concerning the activity <strong>of</strong> individual essential oils<br />
against the micr<strong>of</strong>lora <strong>of</strong> the oral cavity. In addition, a review <strong>of</strong> the literature fi nds a surprising<br />
number <strong>of</strong> in vivo papers that detail the activities <strong>of</strong> “an essential oil mouthrinse.” Closer examination<br />
reveals that the essential oil mouthrinse is the commercial product, Listerine.<br />
Although Listerine contains 21% or 26% alcohol (depending on the exact product), a 6-month<br />
study has shown that it contributes nothing to the efficaciousness <strong>of</strong> the mouthrinse (Lamster<br />
et al., 1983). The active ingredients are 1,8-cineole (0.092%), menthol (0.042%), methyl salicylate<br />
(0.06%), <strong>and</strong> thymol (0.64%). For this reason, a small r<strong>and</strong>om selection <strong>of</strong> such papers is<br />
included below.
Phytotherapeutic Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 321<br />
11.4.4.1 Activity <strong>of</strong> Listerine against Plaque <strong>and</strong>/or Gingivitis<br />
An observer-blind, 4-day plaque regrowth, crossover study compared the use <strong>of</strong> Listerine ® with a<br />
triclosan mouthrinse <strong>and</strong> two placebo controls in 32 volunteers. All normal hygiene procedures were<br />
suspended except for the rinses. The triclosan product produced a 45% reduction in plaque area <strong>and</strong><br />
a 12% reduction in plaque index against its placebo, in comparison with 52% <strong>and</strong> 17%, respectively,<br />
for the essential oil rinse. The latter was thus deemed more effective (Moran et al., 1997).<br />
A similar protocol was used to compare the effects <strong>of</strong> Listerine against an amine fluoride/stannous<br />
fluoride-containing mouthrinse (Meridol ® ) <strong>and</strong> a 0.1% chlorhexidine mouthrinse (Chlorhexamed ® )<br />
in inhibiting the development <strong>of</strong> supragingival plaque. On day 5 <strong>of</strong> each treatment, the results from<br />
23 volunteers were evaluated. In comparison with their placebos, the median plaque reductions<br />
were 12.2%, 23%, <strong>and</strong> 38.2% for the fluoride, essential oil, <strong>and</strong> chlorhexidine rinses, respectively.<br />
The latter two results were statistically significant (Riep et al., 1999).<br />
After the assessment for the presence <strong>of</strong> gingivitis <strong>and</strong> target pathogens (Porphyromonas<br />
gingivalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, <strong>and</strong> Veillonella sp.) <strong>and</strong> total anaerobes, 37 patients undertook<br />
a twice daily mouthrinse with Listerine for 14 days. After a washout period, the study was<br />
conducted again using a flavored hydroalcoholic placebo. The results <strong>of</strong> this r<strong>and</strong>omized, doubleblind,<br />
crossover study showed that the essential oil rinse significantly lowered the number <strong>of</strong> all<br />
target pathogens by 66.3–79.2%, as compared to the control (Fine et al., 2007).<br />
The effect <strong>of</strong> adding Listerine mouthrinse to a st<strong>and</strong>ard oral hygiene regime in 50 orthodontic<br />
patients was examined. The control group brushed <strong>and</strong> flossed twice daily, whereas the test group<br />
also used the mouthrinse twice daily. Measurements <strong>of</strong> bleeding, gingival, <strong>and</strong> plaque indices were<br />
conducted at 3 <strong>and</strong> 6 months. All three indices were significantly lowered in the test group as compared<br />
to the control at both time intervals (Tufekci et al., 2008).<br />
The same fixed combination <strong>of</strong> essential oils that is found in Listerine mouthrinse has been incorporated<br />
into a dentifrice. Such a dentifrice was used in a 6-month double-blind study to determine its<br />
effect on the microbial composition <strong>of</strong> dental plaque as compared to an identical dentifrice without<br />
essential oils. Supragingival plaque <strong>and</strong> saliva samples were collected at baseline <strong>and</strong> their microbial<br />
content characterized, after which the study was conducted for 6 months. The essential oil dentifrice did<br />
not significantly alter the microbial flora <strong>and</strong> opportunistic pathogens did not emerge, nor was there any<br />
sign <strong>of</strong> developing resistance to the essential oils in tested bacterial species (Charles et al., 2000).<br />
The same dentifrice was examined for antiplaque <strong>and</strong> antigingivitis properties in a blinded, r<strong>and</strong>omized,<br />
controlled trial. Before treatment, 200 patients were assessed using a plaque index, a<br />
modified gingival index (GI), <strong>and</strong> a bleeding index. The dentifrice was used for 6 months, after<br />
which another assessment was made. It was found that the essential oil dentifrice had a statistically<br />
significant lower whole-mouth <strong>and</strong> interproximal plaque index (18.3% <strong>and</strong> 18.1%), mean GI (16.2%<br />
<strong>and</strong> 15.5%), <strong>and</strong> mean bleeding index (40.5% <strong>and</strong> 46.9%), as compared to the control. It was therefore<br />
proven to be an effective antiplaque <strong>and</strong> antigingivitis agent (Coelho et al., 2000).<br />
11.4.4.2 Antiviral Listerine<br />
A trial was conducted to examine whether a mouthrinse could decrease the risk <strong>of</strong> viral crosscontamination<br />
from oral fluids during dental procedures. Forty patients with a perioral outbreak <strong>of</strong><br />
recurrent herpes labialis were given a 30-s mouthrinse with either water or Listerine. Salivary<br />
samples were taken at baseline, immediately following the rinse <strong>and</strong> 30 min after the rinse <strong>and</strong><br />
evaluated for the viral titer. Infectious virions were reduced immediately to zero postrinse <strong>and</strong> there<br />
was a continued significant reduction 30 min postrinse. The reduction by the control was not significant<br />
(Meiller et al., 2005).<br />
11.4.4.3 Activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
The antibacterial activity <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Lippia multifl ora was first examined in vitro for<br />
antimicrobial activity against ATCC strains <strong>and</strong> clinical isolates <strong>of</strong> the buccal flora. A significant
322 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
activity was found, with an MBC <strong>of</strong> 1/1400 for streptococci <strong>and</strong> staphylococci, 1/800 for enterobacteria<br />
<strong>and</strong> neisseria, <strong>and</strong> 1/600 for c<strong>and</strong>ida. A mouthwash was prepared with the essential oil at a<br />
1/500 dilution <strong>and</strong> this was used in two clinical trials.<br />
The buccodental conditions <strong>of</strong> 26 French children were documented by measuring the percentage<br />
<strong>of</strong> dental surface free <strong>of</strong> plaque, gum inflammation, <strong>and</strong> the papillary bleeding index (PBI).<br />
After 7 days <strong>of</strong> rinsing with the mouthwash for 2 min, the test group was found to have a reduction<br />
<strong>of</strong> dental plaque in 69% <strong>of</strong> cases <strong>and</strong> a drop in PBI with a clear improvement <strong>of</strong> gum inflammation<br />
in all cases. The second trial was conducted in the Cote d’Ivoire with 60 adult patients with a variety<br />
<strong>of</strong> conditions. After using the mouthwash after every meal for 5 days, it was found that c<strong>and</strong>idiasis<br />
had disappeared in most cases, gingivitis was resolved in all patients, <strong>and</strong> 77% <strong>of</strong> dental abscesses<br />
had resorbed (Pélissier et al., 1994).<br />
Fluconazole-refractory oropharyngeal c<strong>and</strong>idiasis is a common condition in HIV patients. Twelve<br />
such patients were treated with 15 mL <strong>of</strong> a Melaleuca alternifolia oral solution (Breath-Away) four<br />
times daily for 2 weeks, in a single center, open-label clinical trial. The solution was swished in the<br />
mouth for 30–60 s <strong>and</strong> then expelled, with no rinsing for at least 30 min. Clinical assessment was<br />
carried out on days 7 <strong>and</strong> 14 <strong>and</strong> also on days 28 <strong>and</strong> 42 <strong>of</strong> the follow-up. Two patients were clinically<br />
cured <strong>and</strong> six were improved after the therapy; four remained unchanged <strong>and</strong> one deteriorated.<br />
The overall clinical response rate was thus 67% <strong>and</strong> was considered as a possible alternative antifungal<br />
treatment in such cases (J<strong>and</strong>ourek et al., 1998).<br />
A clinical pilot study compared the effect <strong>of</strong> 0.34% Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil<br />
solution with 0.1% chlorhexidine on supragingival plaque formation <strong>and</strong> vitality. Eight subjects<br />
participated, with a 10-day washout period between each treatment regime <strong>of</strong> 1 week. The plaque<br />
area was calculated using a stain <strong>and</strong> plaque vitality was estimated using a fluorescence<br />
technique. Neither <strong>of</strong> these parameters was reduced by the tea tree oil treatment (Arweiler et al.,<br />
2000).<br />
A gel containing 2.5% Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil was used in a double-blind,<br />
longitudinal noncrossover trial <strong>and</strong> compared with a chlorhexidine gel positive control <strong>and</strong> a placebo<br />
gel in the treatment <strong>of</strong> plaque <strong>and</strong> chronic gingivitis. The gels were applied as a dentifrice<br />
twice daily by 49 subjects for 8 weeks <strong>and</strong> the treatment was assessed using a gingival index (GI),<br />
a PBI, <strong>and</strong> a plaque staining score. The tea tree group showed a significant reduction in PBI <strong>and</strong><br />
GI scores, although plaque scores were not reduced. It was apparent that the tea tree gel decreased<br />
the level <strong>of</strong> gingival inflammation more than the positive or negative controls (Soukoulis <strong>and</strong><br />
Hirsch, 2004).<br />
A mouthcare solution consisting <strong>of</strong> an essential oil mixture <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca alternifolia, Mentha<br />
piperita, <strong>and</strong> Citrus limon in a 2:1:2 ratio diluted in water to a 0.125% solution was used to treat oral<br />
malodor in 32 intensive care unit patients, 13 <strong>of</strong> whom were ventilated. The solution was used to<br />
clean the teeth, tongue, <strong>and</strong> oral cavity twice daily. The level <strong>of</strong> malodor was assessed by a nurse<br />
using a visual analogue scale, <strong>and</strong> volatile sulfur compounds (VSC) were measured via a probe in<br />
the mouth, before, 5 <strong>and</strong> 60 min after treatment. On the second day, the procedure was repeated<br />
using benzydamine hydrochloride (BH), which is normally used for oral hygiene, instead <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oil solution. The perception <strong>of</strong> oral malodor was significantly lowered after the essential oil<br />
treatment but not after the BH treatment. There was a decrease in VSC levels at 60 min for both<br />
treatment groups, but not after 5 min for the oil mixture. The results suggested that just one session<br />
with the essential oil mixture could improve oral malodor <strong>and</strong> VSC in intensive care patients (Hur<br />
et al., 2007).<br />
The essential oil <strong>of</strong> Lippia sidoides (rich in thymol <strong>and</strong> carvacrol) was used in a double-blind,<br />
r<strong>and</strong>omized, parallel-armed study against gingival inflammation <strong>and</strong> bacterial plaque. Fifty-five<br />
patients used a 1% essential oil solution as a mouthrinse twice daily for 7 days <strong>and</strong> the results were<br />
compared with a positive control, 0.12% chlorhexidine. Clinical assessment demonstrated decreased<br />
plaque index <strong>and</strong> gingival bleeding scores as compared to the baseline, with no significant difference<br />
between test <strong>and</strong> control. The essential oil <strong>of</strong> Lippia sidoides was considered a safe <strong>and</strong> effective<br />
treatment (Botelho et al., 2007).
Phytotherapeutic Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 323<br />
11.4.5 CONTROLLING MICROFLORA IN ATOPIC DERMATITIS<br />
Rarely found on healthy skin, Staphylococcus aureus is usually present in dry skin <strong>and</strong> is one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
factors that can worsen atopic dermatitis. Toxins <strong>and</strong> enzymes deriving from this bacteria cause<br />
skin damage <strong>and</strong> form a bi<strong>of</strong>ilm from fibrin <strong>and</strong> glycocalyx, which aids adhesion to the skin <strong>and</strong><br />
resistance to antibiotics. An initial in vitro study found that a mixture <strong>of</strong> xylitol (a sugar alcohol) <strong>and</strong><br />
farnesol was an effective agent against Staphylococcus aureus; xylitol inhibited the formation<br />
<strong>of</strong> glycocalyx whereas farnesol dissolved fibrin <strong>and</strong> suppressed Staphylococcus aureus growth<br />
without affecting Staphylococcus epidermidis (Masako et al., 2005a).<br />
The same mixture <strong>of</strong> xylitol <strong>and</strong> farnesol was used in a double-blind, r<strong>and</strong>omized, placebocontrolled<br />
study <strong>of</strong> 17 patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis on their arms. A skin-care<br />
cream containing 0.02% farnesol <strong>and</strong> 5% xylitol or the cream alone was applied to either the left or<br />
the right arms for 7 days. The ratio <strong>of</strong> Staphylococcus aureus to other aerobic skin micr<strong>of</strong>lora was<br />
significantly decreased in the test group compared to placebo, from 74% to 41%, while the numbers<br />
<strong>of</strong> coagulase-negative staphylococci increased. In addition, skin conductance (indicating hydration<br />
<strong>of</strong> skin surface) significantly increased at the test cream sites compared to before application <strong>and</strong> to<br />
the placebo (Masako et al., 2005b).<br />
11.4.6 ODOR MANAGEMENT FOR FUNGATING WOUNDS<br />
Fungating wounds may be caused by primary skin carcinomas, underlying tumors or via spread<br />
from other tissues. The malodor associated with such necrosis is caused by the presence <strong>of</strong> aerobic<br />
<strong>and</strong> anaerobic bacteria. The wounds rarely heal <strong>and</strong> require constant palliative treatment, leading to<br />
social isolation <strong>of</strong> the patients <strong>and</strong> poor quality <strong>of</strong> life.<br />
Smell reduction with essential oils was first reported by Warnke et al. (2004) in 25 malodorous<br />
patients with inoperable squamous cell carcinoma <strong>of</strong> the head <strong>and</strong> neck. A commercial product<br />
containing eucalyptus, grapefruit, <strong>and</strong> tea tree essential oils (Megabac ® ) was applied topically to the<br />
wounds twice daily. Normal medication apart from Betadine disinfection was continued. The smell<br />
disappeared completely within 2–3 days <strong>and</strong> signs <strong>of</strong> superinfection <strong>and</strong> pus secretion were reduced<br />
in the necrotic areas.<br />
Megabac has also been used in a small pilot study (10 patients) to treat gangrenous areas, being<br />
applied via spray thrice daily until granulation tissue formed. The treatment was then continued<br />
onto newly formed split skin grafts. All wounds healed within 8 weeks <strong>and</strong> no concurrent antibiotics<br />
were used (Sherry et al., 2003).<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> essential oils to reduce the smell <strong>of</strong> fungating wounds in 13 palliative care patients was<br />
detailed by another group the following year. Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia, Melaleuca alternifolia, <strong>and</strong><br />
Pogostemon cablin essential oils were used alone or in combinations at 2.5–5% concentrations in a<br />
cream base. The treatments were effective (Mercier <strong>and</strong> Knevitt, 2005).<br />
A further study was conducted with 30 patients suffering incurable head <strong>and</strong> neck cancers with<br />
malodorous necrotic ulcers. A custom-made product (Klonemax ® ) containing eucalyptus, tea tree,<br />
lemongrass, lemon, clove, <strong>and</strong> thyme essential oils was applied topically (5 mL) twice daily. All<br />
patients had a complete resolution <strong>of</strong> the malodor; in addition to the antibacterial activity, an<br />
anti-inflammatory effect was also noted (Warnke et al., 2006).<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> essential oils to treat malodorous wounds in cancer patients is becoming widespread<br />
in many palliative care units although no formal clinical trials have been conducted as yet.<br />
11.5 DISSOLUTION OF HEPATIC AND RENAL STONES<br />
11.5.1 GALL AND BILIARY TRACT STONES<br />
Rowachol <strong>and</strong> Rowatinex are two commercial products that have been marketed for many years <strong>and</strong><br />
are based on essential oil components. They are sometimes thought <strong>of</strong> as being the same product but
324 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 11.1<br />
Composition <strong>of</strong> Rowachol <strong>and</strong> Rowatinex<br />
Declared by the Manufacturers<br />
Component Rowachol Rowatinex<br />
a-pinene 20.0 37.0<br />
b-pinene 5.0 9.0<br />
Camphene 8.0 22.0<br />
1,8-cineole 3.0 4.0<br />
Fenchone — 6.0<br />
Menthone 9.0 —<br />
Borneol 8.0 15.0<br />
Menthol 48.0 —<br />
anethole — 6.0<br />
Source: Sybilska, D. <strong>and</strong> M. Asztemborska, 2002. J. Biochem.<br />
Biophys. Methods., 54: 187–195.<br />
in fact they are different. The compositions have changed slightly over the years <strong>and</strong> the most<br />
recently disclosed are shown in Table 11.1.<br />
Rowachol has been in use for over 50 years for the dissolution <strong>of</strong> gallstones <strong>and</strong> biliary tract stones.<br />
There have been many published works on its effects <strong>and</strong> at least one double-blind trial (Lamy, 1967).<br />
It has been stated that although the dissolution rate <strong>of</strong> Rowachol is not impressive, it is still much<br />
greater than Rowatinex <strong>and</strong> could occur spontaneously (Doran <strong>and</strong> Bell, 1979). It has been employed<br />
alone as a useful therapy for common duct stones (Ellis <strong>and</strong> Bell, 1981) although improved results were<br />
demonstrated when Rowachol was used in conjunction with bile acid therapy (Ellis et al., 1981).<br />
Rowachol has been shown to inhibit hepatic cholesterol synthesis mediated by a decreased<br />
hepatic S-3-hydroxy-3-methylgutaryl-CoA reductase activity (Middleton <strong>and</strong> Hui, 1982); the<br />
components mostly responsible for this activity were menthol <strong>and</strong> 1,8-cineole, with pinene <strong>and</strong><br />
camphene having no significant effect (Clegg et al., 1980). A reduction in cholesterol crystal formation<br />
in the bile <strong>of</strong> gallstone patients has been demonstrated in a small trial using Rowachol<br />
(von Bergmann, 1987).<br />
Two early uncontrolled trials reported that Rowachol significantly increased plasma high-density<br />
lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol when administered to patients with low HDL cholesterol; a tw<strong>of</strong>old<br />
increase was found in 10 subjects after 6 weeks <strong>of</strong> treatment (Hordinsky <strong>and</strong> Hordinsky, 1979),<br />
while a progressive increase in HDL <strong>of</strong> 14 subjects was noted, >100% after 6 months (Bell<br />
et al., 1980). This was interesting as low plasma concentrations <strong>of</strong> HDLs are associated with an<br />
elevated risk <strong>of</strong> coronary heart disease. However, a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that<br />
administered six capsules <strong>of</strong> Rowachol daily for 24 weeks to 19 men found that there were no significant<br />
HDL-elevating effects <strong>of</strong> the treatment (Cooke et al., 1998). It is currently thought that<br />
monoterpenes have no HDL-elevating potential that is useful for disease prevention.<br />
In vitro, a solution <strong>of</strong> 97% d-limonene was found to be 100-fold better at solubilizing cholesterol<br />
than sodium cholate. A small trial followed with 15 patients, whereby 20 ml <strong>of</strong> the d-limonene<br />
preparation was introduced into the gallbladder via a catheter on alternate days for up to 48 days.<br />
The treatment was successful in 13 patients with gallstone dissolution sometimes occurring after<br />
three infusions. Side effects included vomiting <strong>and</strong> diarrhea (Igimi et al., 1976).<br />
A further study was conducted by Igimi et al. (1991) using the same technique with 200 patients.<br />
Treatments lasted from 3 weeks to 4 months. Complete or partial dissolution <strong>of</strong> gallstones was achieved<br />
in 141 patients, with complete disappearance <strong>of</strong> stones in 48% <strong>of</strong> cases. Epigastric pain was experienced<br />
by 168 patients <strong>and</strong> 121 suffered nausea <strong>and</strong> vomiting. Further trials have not been conducted.
Phytotherapeutic Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 325<br />
11.5.2 RENAL STONES<br />
While Rowachol is used as a measure against gallstones <strong>and</strong> biliary tract stones, Rowatinex is<br />
used in the treatment <strong>of</strong> renal stones. The first double-blind, r<strong>and</strong>omized trial was conducted by<br />
Mukamel et al. (1987) on 40 patients with acute renal colic. In the Rowatinex group, there was a<br />
significantly higher expulsion rate <strong>of</strong> stones ≥3 mm in diameter in comparison with the placebo<br />
(61% <strong>and</strong> 28%, respectively). There was also a higher overall success rate in terms <strong>of</strong> spontaneous<br />
stone expulsion <strong>and</strong>/or disappearance <strong>of</strong> ureteral dilatation in the treatment group compared to<br />
placebo (78–52%), but the difference was not statistically significant.<br />
A second double-blind, r<strong>and</strong>omized trial was conducted on 87 patients with ureterolithiasis.<br />
Four Rowatinex capsules were prescribed four times a day, the average treatment time being<br />
two weeks. The overall stone expulsion rate was significantly higher in the Rowatinex group as<br />
compared to placebo; 81% <strong>and</strong> 51%, respectively. Mild to moderate gastrointestinal disturbances<br />
were noted in seven patients. It was concluded that the early treatment <strong>of</strong> ureteral stones<br />
with Rowatinex was preferable before more aggressive measures were considered (Engelstein<br />
et al., 1992).<br />
Rowatinex has also been used with success in the removal <strong>of</strong> residual stone fragments after extracorporeal<br />
shock wave lithotriptsy, a situation that occurs in up to 72% <strong>of</strong> patients when given this<br />
therapy. With 50 patients, it was found that Rowatinex decreased the number <strong>of</strong> calculi debris,<br />
reducing the number <strong>of</strong> late complications <strong>and</strong> further interventions. By day 28, 82% <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
were free <strong>of</strong> calculi whereas this situation is normally reached after 3 months without Rowatinex<br />
treatment (Siller et al., 1998).<br />
A minor study examined the use <strong>of</strong> Rowatinex in the management <strong>of</strong> childhood urolithiasis. Six<br />
children aged from 4 months to 5 years were administered varying doses <strong>of</strong> the preparation from<br />
10 days to 12 weeks. All patients became stone-free with no side effects, although a definite conclusion<br />
as to the efficacy <strong>of</strong> treatment could not be established due to the small patient number involved<br />
(Al-Mosawi, 2005).<br />
A comparison <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> an a-blocker (tamsulosin) <strong>and</strong> Rowatinex for the spontaneous<br />
expulsion <strong>of</strong> ureter stones <strong>and</strong> pain control was undertaken using 192 patients. They were divided<br />
into three groups: analgesics only, Rowatinex with analgesics, <strong>and</strong> tamsulosin with analgesics. For<br />
ureter stones less than 4 mm in diameter, their excretion was accelerated by both Rowatinex <strong>and</strong><br />
tamsulosin. The use <strong>of</strong> these two treatments also decreased the amount <strong>of</strong> analgesics required <strong>and</strong><br />
it was concluded that they should be considered as adjuvant regimes (Bak et al., 2007).<br />
11.6 FUNCTIONAL DYSPEPSIA<br />
Several essential oils have been used in the treatment <strong>of</strong> functional (nonulcer) dyspepsia. All <strong>of</strong> the<br />
published trials have concerned the commercial preparation known as Enteroplant ® , an entericcoated<br />
capsule containing 90 mg <strong>of</strong> Mentha ¥ piperita, <strong>and</strong> 50 mg <strong>of</strong> Carum carvi essential oils.<br />
The combination <strong>of</strong> peppermint <strong>and</strong> caraway essential oils has been shown to act locally in the<br />
gut as an antispasmodic (Micklefield et al., 2000, 2003) <strong>and</strong> to have a relaxing effect on the gallbladder<br />
(Goerg <strong>and</strong> Spilker, 2003). The antispasmodic effect <strong>of</strong> peppermint is well documented <strong>and</strong><br />
that <strong>of</strong> caraway essential oil has also been demonstrated (Reiter <strong>and</strong> Br<strong>and</strong>t, 1985). The latter alone<br />
has also been shown to inhibit gallbladder contractions in healthy volunteers, increasing gallbladder<br />
volume by 90% (Goerg <strong>and</strong> Spilker, 1996).<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the first studies involved 45 patients in a double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial<br />
with the administration <strong>of</strong> Enteroplant thrice daily for 4 weeks. It was found to be superior to placebo<br />
with regard to pain frequency, severity, efficacy, <strong>and</strong> medical prognosis. Clinical Global Impressions<br />
were improved for 94.5% <strong>of</strong> patients using the essential oil combination (May et al., 1996).<br />
The activity <strong>of</strong> Enteroplant (twice daily) was compared with that <strong>of</strong> cisapride (30 mg daily), a<br />
serotonin 5-HT 4 agonist that stimulates upper gastrointestinal tract motility, over a 4-week period.
326 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
This double-blind, r<strong>and</strong>omized trial found that both products had comparable efficacy in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
pain severity <strong>and</strong> frequency, Dyspeptic Discomfort Score, <strong>and</strong> Clinical Global Impressions (Madisch<br />
et al., 1999).<br />
Another double-blind, r<strong>and</strong>omized trial administered either Enteroplant or placebo twice daily<br />
for 28 days. Pain intensity <strong>and</strong> pressure, heaviness, <strong>and</strong> fullness were reduced in the test group by<br />
40% <strong>and</strong> 43% as compared to 22% for both in the placebo group, respectively. In addition, Clinical<br />
Global Impressions were improved by 67% for the peppermint/caraway combination whereas the<br />
placebo scored 21% (May et al., 2000).<br />
Holtmann et al. (2001) were the first to investigate the effect <strong>of</strong> Enteroplant (twice daily) on disease-specific<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> life as measured by the Nepean Dyspepsia Index. All scores were significantly<br />
improved compared to the placebo. In 2002, the same team also demonstrated that patients<br />
suffering with severe pain or severe discomfort both responded significantly better in comparison<br />
with the placebo.<br />
Approximately 50% <strong>of</strong> patients suffering from functional dyspepsia are infected with Helicobacter<br />
pylori (Freidman, 1998). The Helicobacter status <strong>of</strong> 96 patients <strong>and</strong> the efficacy <strong>of</strong> Enteroplant were<br />
compared by May et al. (2003). They found that patients with Helicobacter pylori infection demonstrated<br />
a substantially better treatment response than those who were not infected. However, a previous<br />
study found no efficacy differences between infected <strong>and</strong> noninfected functional dyspepsia<br />
patients (Madisch et al., 2000) <strong>and</strong> so the effect <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> the bacterium on Enteroplant<br />
treatment has yet to be elucidated.<br />
A short review <strong>of</strong> the literature concluded that treatment with the fixed peppermint/caraway<br />
essential oil combination had demonstrated significant efficacy in placebo-controlled trials, had<br />
good tolerability <strong>and</strong> safety, <strong>and</strong> could thus be considered for the long-term management <strong>of</strong> functional<br />
dyspepsia patients (Holtmann et al.,2003).<br />
11.7 GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX<br />
d-Limonene has been found to be effective in the treatment <strong>of</strong> gastroesophageal reflux disorder.<br />
Nineteen patients took one capsule <strong>of</strong> 1000 mg d-limonene every day <strong>and</strong> rated their symptoms<br />
using a severity/frequency index. After 2 days, 32% <strong>of</strong> patients had significant relief <strong>and</strong> by day 14,<br />
89% <strong>of</strong> patients had complete relief <strong>of</strong> symptoms (Wilkins, 2002).<br />
A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted with 13 patients who were administered<br />
one 1000 mg capsule <strong>of</strong> d-limonene daily or on alternate days. By day 14, 86% <strong>of</strong> patients were<br />
asymptomatic compared to 29% in the placebo group (Wilkins, 2002).<br />
The mechanism <strong>of</strong> action <strong>of</strong> d-limonene has not been fully elucidated in this regard but it is<br />
thought that it may coat the mucosal lining <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>fer protection against gastric acid <strong>and</strong>/or promote<br />
healthy peristalsis.<br />
11.8 HYPERLIPOPROTEINEMIA<br />
Girosital is a Bulgarian encapsulated product consisting <strong>of</strong> rose essential oil (68 mg) <strong>and</strong> vitamin A<br />
in sunflower vegetable oil. Initial animal studies found that rose oil administered at 0.01<br />
<strong>and</strong> 0.05 mL/ kg had a hepatoprotective effect against ethanol. Dystrophy <strong>and</strong> lipid infiltration were<br />
lowered <strong>and</strong> glycogen tended to complete recovery, suggesting a beneficial effect <strong>of</strong> rose oil on lipid<br />
metabolism (Kirov et al., 1988a).<br />
Girosital was administered to 33 men with long-st<strong>and</strong>ing alcohol abuse, twice daily for 3 months.<br />
It significantly reduced serum triglycerides <strong>and</strong> low-density lipoprotein <strong>and</strong> increased the level <strong>of</strong><br />
HDL-cholesterin; it was particularly effective for the treatment <strong>of</strong> hyperlipoproteinemia types IIb<br />
<strong>and</strong> IV. Liver lesions relating to alcohol intoxication improved <strong>and</strong> subjective complaints such as<br />
dyspeptic symptoms <strong>and</strong> pain were reduced (Konstantinova et al., 1988).
Phytotherapeutic Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 327<br />
The hypolipidemic effect <strong>of</strong> Girosital was again studied by giving a capsule once daily for<br />
20 days in 35 patients with hyperlipoproteinemia. In type IIa hyperlipoproteinemia cases, the total<br />
lipids were reduced by 23.91% <strong>and</strong> the total cholesterol by 10.64%. For type IIb patients, the total<br />
lipid reduction was 15.93%, triglycerides fell by 25.45%, <strong>and</strong> cholesterol by 14.06%; in type IV cases<br />
the reductions were 33.83%, 25.33%, <strong>and</strong> 36%, respectively. Girosital was more effective in comparison<br />
with the treatment with bezalipe <strong>and</strong> cl<strong>of</strong>ibrate (Stankusheva, 1988).<br />
Thirty-two patients with hyperlipoproteinemia <strong>and</strong> arterial hypertension were administered one<br />
Girosital capsule twice daily for 110 days. A marked reduction in hyperlipoproteinemia was demonstrated<br />
in all patients. The hypocholesterolemic effect manifested first in type IIa patients after<br />
20 days, <strong>and</strong> later in type IIb cases. Reduction <strong>of</strong> serum triglycerides in type IIb began 50 days after<br />
the commencement <strong>of</strong> treatment (Kirov et al., 1988b).<br />
A further study (Mechkov et al., 1988) examined the effect <strong>of</strong> Girosital capsules twice daily for<br />
110 days in 30 patients with cholelithiasis, liver steatosis, <strong>and</strong> hyperlipoproteinemia. Total cholesterol<br />
decreased after 20 days <strong>of</strong> treatment although it tended to rise slightly later in the test period.<br />
The triglycerides were most affected in hyperlipoproteinemia types IIb <strong>and</strong> IV. The b-lipoprotein<br />
values were not altered by the treatment.<br />
11.9 IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME<br />
The essential oil <strong>of</strong> Mentha ¥ piperita has been used for many years as a natural carminative <strong>of</strong> the<br />
gastrointestinal tract. This effect is principally due to the antispasmodic activity <strong>of</strong> menthol, which<br />
acts as a calcium channel antagonist <strong>of</strong> the intestinal smooth muscle (Taylor et al., 1984, 1985).<br />
Secondary effects include a reduction <strong>of</strong> gastrointestinal foam by peppermint oil (Harries et al.,<br />
1978) <strong>and</strong> a choleretic activity that is attributed to menthol (Rangelov et al., 1988). The reduction <strong>of</strong><br />
intestinal hydrogen production caused by bacterial overgrowth has also been demonstrated in<br />
patients by enteric-coated peppermint oil (Logan <strong>and</strong> Beaulne, 2002).<br />
The first clinical trial <strong>of</strong> peppermint for the treatment <strong>of</strong> irritable bowel syndrome was conducted<br />
by Rees et al. (1979). They prescribed 0.2 mL <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil in enteric-coated capsules (1–2<br />
capsules depending on symptom severity) thrice daily. Patient assessment considered the oil to<br />
be superior to the placebo in relieving abdominal symptoms.<br />
Since then, a further 15 double-blind <strong>and</strong> two open trials have been conducted; examples <strong>of</strong> these<br />
can be seen in Table 11.2.<br />
Eight studies used the commercial preparation known as Colpermin ® <strong>and</strong> two used Mintoil ® , the<br />
capsules <strong>of</strong> which contain 187 <strong>and</strong> 225 mg <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil, respectively. The other studies used<br />
enteric-coated capsules usually containing 0.2 mL <strong>of</strong> the essential oil.<br />
The latest trial (Cappello et al., 2007) used a r<strong>and</strong>omized, double-blind, placebo-controlled<br />
design to test the efficacy <strong>of</strong> two capsules <strong>of</strong> Mintoil twice daily for 4 weeks. The symptoms evaluated<br />
before the treatment <strong>and</strong> at 4 <strong>and</strong> 8 weeks post-treatment were abdominal bloating, pain or<br />
discomfort, diarrhea, constipation, incomplete or urgency <strong>of</strong> defecation, <strong>and</strong> the passage <strong>of</strong> gas or<br />
mucus. The frequency <strong>and</strong> intensity <strong>of</strong> these symptoms was used to calculate the total irritable<br />
bowel syndrome symptoms score. At 4 weeks, 75% <strong>of</strong> patients in the peppermint oil group demonstrated<br />
a >50% reduction <strong>of</strong> the symptoms score as compared to 38% in the placebo group. At 4 <strong>and</strong><br />
8 weeks in the peppermint oil group compared to that before the treatment, there was a statistically<br />
significant reduction <strong>of</strong> the total irritable bowel syndrome symptoms score whereas there was no<br />
change with the placebo.<br />
A critical review <strong>and</strong> meta-analysis <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil for irritable bowel syndrome was<br />
published by Pittler <strong>and</strong> Ernst (1998). They examined five double-blind, placebo-controlled trials;<br />
there was a significant difference between peppermint oil <strong>and</strong> placebo in three cases <strong>and</strong> no significant<br />
difference in two cases. It was concluded that although a beneficial effect <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil was<br />
demonstrated, its role in treatment was not established.
328 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 11.2<br />
Examples <strong>of</strong> Clinical Trials <strong>of</strong> Peppermint Oil in the Treatment <strong>of</strong> Irritable<br />
Bowel Syndrome<br />
Patients Treatment Outcome Reference<br />
18 0.2–0.4 mL thrice daily<br />
for 3 weeks<br />
29 0.2–0.4 mL thrice daily<br />
for 2 weeks<br />
25 0.2 mL thrice daily<br />
for 2 weeks<br />
35 One Colpermin thrice daily<br />
for 24 weeks<br />
110 One Colpermin 3–4 times<br />
daily for 2 weeks<br />
42 1–2 Colpermin thrice daily<br />
for 2 weeks<br />
178 Two Mintoil thrice daily<br />
for 3 months<br />
57 Two Mintoil twice daily<br />
for 4 weeks<br />
Superior to placebo in relieving Rees et al. (1979)<br />
abdominal symptoms<br />
Superior to placebo in relieving Dew et al. (1984)<br />
abdominal symptoms<br />
No significant change in symptoms Lawson et al. (1988)<br />
as compared to placebo<br />
Effective in relieving symptoms Shaw et al. (1991)<br />
Significant improvement in<br />
symptoms as compared to placebo<br />
75% <strong>of</strong> children had reduced pain<br />
severity<br />
Significant improvement in<br />
gastroenteric symptoms as<br />
compared to placebo (97%<br />
versus 33%, respectively)<br />
Significant reduction in overall<br />
symptom score<br />
Liu et al. (1997)<br />
Kline et al. (2001)<br />
Capanni et al. (2005)<br />
Cappello et al. (2007)<br />
A review <strong>of</strong> 16 trials was conducted by Grigoleit <strong>and</strong> Grigoleit (2005). They concluded that there<br />
was reasonable evidence that the administration <strong>of</strong> enteric-coated peppermint oil (180–200 mg)<br />
thrice daily was an effective treatment for irritable bowel syndrome when compared to placebo or<br />
the antispasmodic drugs investigated (mebeverine, hyoscyamine, <strong>and</strong> alverine citrate).<br />
A comparison between two commercial delayed release peppermint oil preparations found that<br />
there were differences in the pharmacokinetics in relation to bioavailability times <strong>and</strong> release site.<br />
A capsule that is more effective in delivering the peppermint oil to the distal small intestine <strong>and</strong><br />
ascending colon would be more beneficial in the treatment <strong>of</strong> irritable bowel syndrome (White<br />
et al., 1987). It has also been suggested that the conflicting results in some trials may be due to<br />
the inclusion <strong>of</strong> patients suffering from lactose intolerance, syndrome <strong>of</strong> small intestinal bacterial<br />
overgrowth, <strong>and</strong> celiac disease, all <strong>of</strong> which have symptoms similar to irritable bowel disease<br />
(Cappello et al., 2007).<br />
11.10 MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS<br />
Although not employed in a treatment context, the antispasmodic activity <strong>of</strong> peppermint essential<br />
oil has been used to facilitate examinations <strong>of</strong> the upper <strong>and</strong> lower gastrointestinal tract. A few<br />
examples are highlighted below.<br />
Peppermint oil has also been used during double-contrast barium enemas. The study comprised<br />
383 patients in four groups, two being no-treatment <strong>and</strong> Buscopan groups. The preparation, consisting<br />
<strong>of</strong> 8 mL <strong>of</strong> essential oil, 0.2 mL <strong>of</strong> Tween 80 in 100 mL water, was administered in 30 mL<br />
quantities via the enema tube or mixed in with the barium meal. Peppermint oil had the same spasmolytic<br />
effect as systemic Buscopan in the transverse <strong>and</strong> descending colon <strong>and</strong> a stronger effect in<br />
the cecum <strong>and</strong> ascending colon. Both methods <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil administration were equally effective<br />
(Asao et al., 2003).
Phytotherapeutic Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 329<br />
Orally administered peppermint oil was used in a r<strong>and</strong>omized trial in 430 patients undergoing a<br />
double-contrast barium meal examination, without other antispasmodics. A reduction in spasms <strong>of</strong><br />
the esophagus, lower stomach, <strong>and</strong> duodenal bulb was found, along with an inhibition <strong>of</strong> barium<br />
flow to the distal duodenum <strong>and</strong> an improvement <strong>of</strong> diagnostic quality (Shigeaki et al., 2006).<br />
During endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Buscopan or glucagon is used to<br />
inhibit duodenal motility but produce adverse effects. Various concentrations <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil<br />
were introduced into the upper gastrointestinal tract <strong>of</strong> 40 patients undergoing the procedure.<br />
Duodenal relaxation was obtained with 20 mL <strong>of</strong> 1.6% peppermint oil solution <strong>and</strong> the procedure<br />
was performed successfully in 91.4% <strong>of</strong> patients. The inhibitory effect <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil appeared<br />
to be identical to that <strong>of</strong> glucagon, but without side effects (Yamamoto et al., 2006).<br />
11.11 NAUSEA<br />
A small study examined a variety <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy treatments to 25 patients suffering from nausea<br />
in a hospice <strong>and</strong> palliative care facility. Patients were <strong>of</strong>fered the essential oils <strong>of</strong> Foeniculum vulgare<br />
var. dulce, Chaemomelum nobile, <strong>and</strong> Mentha ¥ piperita, either singly or in blends, depending<br />
on individual preferences. Delivery methods included abdominal compress or massage, personal air<br />
spritzer or scentball diffuser. Only 32% <strong>of</strong> patients reported no response to the treatments <strong>and</strong> they<br />
had all just finished heavy courses <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy. Using a visual-numeric analogue scale, the<br />
remainder <strong>of</strong> patients experienced an improvement in their nausea symptoms when using the aromatherapy<br />
interventions. All patients were also taking antiemetic drugs <strong>and</strong> so the essential oils<br />
were regarded as successful complements to st<strong>and</strong>ard medications (Gilligan, 2005).<br />
A 6-month trial investigated the effect <strong>of</strong> inhaled 5% Zingiber <strong>of</strong>fi cinale essential oil in the prevention<br />
<strong>of</strong> postoperative nausea <strong>and</strong> vomiting (PONV). All patients were at a high risk for PONV <strong>and</strong><br />
all used similar combinations <strong>of</strong> prophylactic intravenous antiemetics. The test group had the essential<br />
oil applied to the volar aspects <strong>of</strong> both wrists via a rollerball immediately prior to surgery. In the<br />
recovery room, patients were questioned as to their feelings <strong>of</strong> nausea. Any patient who felt that they<br />
required further medication was considered a “failure.” Prevention <strong>of</strong> PONV by ginger essential oil<br />
was effective in 80% <strong>of</strong> cases, as measured by no complaint <strong>of</strong> nausea during the recovery period. In<br />
those patients who did not receive the essential oil, 50% experienced nausea (Geiger, 2005).<br />
Another experiment used essential oils to prevent PONV, but they were applied after surgery if<br />
the patient complained <strong>of</strong> nausea. An undiluted mixture <strong>of</strong> Zingiber <strong>of</strong>fi cinale, Elettaria cardamomum,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Artemisia dracunculus essential oils in equal parts was applied with light friction to<br />
the sternocleidomastoid area <strong>and</strong> carotid-jugular axis <strong>of</strong> the neck. Of the 73 cases treated, 50 had<br />
a positive response, that is, a complete block <strong>of</strong> nausea <strong>and</strong> vomiting within 30 min. It was found<br />
that the best response (75%) was with patients who had received a single analgesic/anesthetic<br />
(de Pradier, 2006).<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> essential oils to alleviate motion sickness has also been investigated. A blend <strong>of</strong><br />
Zingiber <strong>of</strong>fi cinale, Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia, Mentha spicata, <strong>and</strong> Mentha ¥ piperita essential oils<br />
in an inhalation dispenser (QueaseEase) was given to 55 ocean boat passengers with a history <strong>of</strong><br />
motion sickness. The oil blend was inhaled as needed during the trip <strong>and</strong> queasiness was assessed<br />
using a linear analogue scale. The product was more effective than the placebo in lowering sensations<br />
<strong>of</strong> nausea when the seas were roughest, but was not significant at other times (Post-White <strong>and</strong><br />
Nichols, 2007).<br />
11.12 PAIN RELIEF<br />
There follows a number <strong>of</strong> differing conditions that have been treated with essential oils with varying<br />
biological activities, such as antispasmodic, anti-inflammatory, <strong>and</strong> so on. They all share a<br />
common effect, that <strong>of</strong> pain relief.
330 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
11.12.1 DYSMENORRHEA<br />
The seeds <strong>of</strong> Foeniculum vulgare have been used in traditional remedies for the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
dysmenorrhea, an action attributed to the antispasmodic effect <strong>of</strong> the essential oil. An in vitro experiment<br />
demonstrated that fennel essential oil inhibited oxytocin- <strong>and</strong> prostagl<strong>and</strong>in E 2 (PGE 2 )-<br />
induced contractions <strong>of</strong> isolated uterus; the former was considered to have a similar activity to<br />
dicl<strong>of</strong>enac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. The overall mechanism <strong>of</strong> action is still unknown<br />
(Ostad et al., 2001).<br />
A r<strong>and</strong>omized, double-blind crossover study examined the effect <strong>of</strong> oral fennel essential oil at<br />
1% or 2% concentration as compared to placebo for the treatment <strong>of</strong> 60 women with mild to moderate<br />
dysmenorrhea. Up to 1 mL <strong>of</strong> the solution was taken as required for the pain at intervals <strong>of</strong> not<br />
less than 4 h. In the treatment groups, the severity <strong>of</strong> the pain was significantly decreased; the<br />
efficacy <strong>of</strong> the 2% fennel oil was 67.4%, which was comparable to the efficacy <strong>of</strong> nonsteroidal antiinflammatory<br />
drugs (Khorshidi et al., 2003).<br />
Thirty patients with moderate to severe dysmenorrhea took part in a study to compare the activity<br />
<strong>of</strong> mefenamic acid with the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Foeniculum vulgare var. dulce. The evaluation was<br />
carried out during the first 5 days <strong>of</strong> three consecutive menstrual cycles. In the first cycle, no intervention<br />
was given (control); during the second cycle, 250 mg <strong>of</strong> mefenamic acid 6 hourly was<br />
prescribed; <strong>and</strong> in the third, 25 drops <strong>of</strong> a 2% solution <strong>of</strong> fennel essential oil were given 4 hourly.<br />
A self-scoring linear analogue technique was used to determine effect <strong>and</strong> potency. Both interventions<br />
effectively relieved menstrual pain as compared to the control. Mefenamic acid was more<br />
potent on the second <strong>and</strong> third days, but the result was not statistically significant. It was concluded<br />
that fennel essential oil was a safe <strong>and</strong> effective remedy but was probably less effective than<br />
mefenamic acid at the dosage used (Jahromi et al., 2003).<br />
A third study used aromatherapy massage for the relief <strong>of</strong> the symptoms <strong>of</strong> dysmenorrhea in<br />
67 students. The essential oils <strong>of</strong> Lav<strong>and</strong>ula <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis, Salvia sclarea, <strong>and</strong> Rosa centifolia (2:1:1 ratio)<br />
were diluted to 3% in 5 mL <strong>of</strong> almond oil <strong>and</strong> applied in a 15-min abdominal massage daily, 1 week<br />
before the start <strong>of</strong> menstruation, <strong>and</strong> stopping on the first day <strong>of</strong> menstruation. The control group<br />
received no treatment <strong>and</strong> the placebo group received massage with almond oil only. The results<br />
showed a significant improvement <strong>of</strong> dysmenorrhea as assessed by a verbal multidimensional scoring<br />
system for the essential oil group compared to the other two groups (Han et al., 2006).<br />
11.12.2 HEADACHE<br />
The effect <strong>of</strong> peppermint <strong>and</strong> eucalyptus essential oils on the neurophysiological, psychological,<br />
<strong>and</strong> experimental algesimetric parameters <strong>of</strong> headache mechanisms were investigated using a<br />
double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 32 healthy subjects. Measurements included sensitivity<br />
to mechanical, thermal, <strong>and</strong> ischemically induced pain. Four preparations consisting <strong>of</strong> varying<br />
amounts <strong>of</strong> peppermint <strong>and</strong>/or eucalyptus oils in ethanol were applied to the forehead <strong>and</strong> temples.<br />
Eucalyptus alone had no effect on the parameters studied. A combination <strong>of</strong> both oils (10% peppermint<br />
<strong>and</strong> 5% eucalyptus) increased cognitive performance <strong>and</strong> had a muscle-relaxing <strong>and</strong><br />
mentally relaxing effect, but did not influence pain sensitivity. Peppermint alone (10%) had a significant<br />
analgesic effect with reduction in sensitivity to headache. It was shown to exert significant<br />
effects on the pathophysiological mechanisms <strong>of</strong> clinical headache syndromes (Göbel et al.,<br />
1995a).<br />
A second study used the same essential oils when investigating the skin perfusion <strong>of</strong> the head in<br />
healthy subjects <strong>and</strong> migraine patients. In the former, capillary flow was increased by 225%<br />
in comparison with baseline by peppermint oil, while eucalyptus decreased the flow by 16%. In<br />
migraine patients, neither essential oil had any effect. It was suggested that the absence <strong>of</strong> capillary<br />
vasodilation (normally caused by menthol) was due to impaired calcium channel function in<br />
migraine patients (Göbel et al., 1995b).
Phytotherapeutic Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 331<br />
11.12.3 INFANTILE COLIC<br />
Since animal studies had demonstrated that the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Foeniculum vulgare reduced intestinal<br />
spasm <strong>and</strong> increased the motility <strong>of</strong> the small intestine, it was used in a double-blind, r<strong>and</strong>omized,<br />
placebo-controlled trial in the treatment <strong>of</strong> infantile colic. The 125 infants were all 2–12 weeks<br />
<strong>of</strong> age <strong>and</strong> those in the treatment group received a water emulsion <strong>of</strong> 0.1% fennel essential oil<br />
<strong>and</strong> 0.4% polysorbate (5–20 mL) up to four times a day. The dose was estimated to provide about<br />
12 mg/kg/day <strong>of</strong> fennel essential oil. The control group received the polysorbate only. The treatment<br />
provided a significant improvement <strong>of</strong> colic, eliminating symptoms in 65% <strong>of</strong> infants as compared<br />
to 23.7% for the control. No side effects were noted (Alex<strong>and</strong>rovich et al., 2003).<br />
11.12.4 JOINT PHYSIOTHERAPY<br />
Six sports physiotherapists treated 30 patients suffering from knee or ankle pathologies <strong>of</strong> traumatic<br />
or surgical origin. Two commercial products were used simultaneously, Dermasport ® <strong>and</strong> Solution<br />
Cryo ® . The former was a gel consisting <strong>of</strong> the essential oils <strong>of</strong> Betula alba, Melaleuca leucadendron,<br />
Cinnamomum camphora, Syzygium aromaticum, Eucalyptus globulus, <strong>and</strong> Gaultheria<br />
procumbens. Solution Cryo contained the same essential oils minus Gaultheria procumbens but<br />
with the addition <strong>of</strong> Chamaemelum nobile, Citrus limon, <strong>and</strong> Cupressus sempervirens. Both products<br />
were at an overall concentration <strong>of</strong> 6%. Thirty minutes after application a net reduction in<br />
movement pain <strong>and</strong> joint circumference was demonstrated, along with an increase in articular flexion<br />
<strong>and</strong> extension <strong>of</strong> both joints in all patients (Le Faou et al., 2005).<br />
11.12.5 NIPPLE PAIN<br />
Nipple cracks <strong>and</strong> pain are a common cause <strong>of</strong> breastfeeding cessation. In a r<strong>and</strong>omized trial 196<br />
primiparous women were studied during the first 2 weeks postpartum. The test group applied peppermint<br />
water (essential oil in water, concentration not given) to the nipple <strong>and</strong> areola after each<br />
breastfeed while the control group applied expressed breast milk. The overall nipple crack rate at<br />
the end <strong>of</strong> the period in the peppermint group was 7% as compared to 23% for the control. Only 2%<br />
<strong>of</strong> peppermint group experienced severe nipple pain in contrast to 23% <strong>of</strong> the control, with 93% <strong>and</strong><br />
71% experiencing no pain, respectively (Melli et al., 2007).<br />
11.12.6 OSTEOARTHRITIS<br />
A blend <strong>of</strong> Zingiber <strong>of</strong>fi cinale (1%) <strong>and</strong> Citrus sinensis (0.5%) essential oils was used in an experimental<br />
double-blind study using 59 patients with moderate to severe knee pain caused by osteoarthritis.<br />
The treatment group received six massage sessions over a 3-week period; the placebo<br />
received the same massage sessions but without the essential oils <strong>and</strong> the control had no intervention.<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> pain intensity, stiffness, <strong>and</strong> physical functioning was carried out at baseline<br />
<strong>and</strong> at post 1 <strong>and</strong> 4 weeks. There were improvements in pain <strong>and</strong> function for the intervention group<br />
in comparison with the placebo <strong>and</strong> control at post 1 week but this was not sustained to week 4. The<br />
treatment was suggested for the relief <strong>of</strong> short-term knee pain (Yip et al., 2008).<br />
11.12.7 POSTHERPETIC NEURALGIA<br />
A double-blind crossover study examined the effect <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Pelargonium spp. on moderate<br />
to severe postherpetic pain in 30 subjects. They were assigned to groups receiving 100, 50, or<br />
10% geranium essential oil (in mineral oil), mineral oil placebo, or capsaicin control. Pain relief was<br />
measured using a visual analogue scale from 0 to 60 min after treatment. Mean values for the time<br />
integral <strong>of</strong> spontaneous pain reduction was 21.3, 12.7, <strong>and</strong> 8.0 for the 100%, 50%, <strong>and</strong> 10% geranium
332 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
oils <strong>and</strong> evoked pain-reduction values were 15.8, 7.7, <strong>and</strong> 5.9, respectively. Both evoked <strong>and</strong> spontaneous<br />
pains were thus significantly reduced in a dose-dependent manner (Greenway et al., 2003).<br />
The result is interesting because topical capsaicin cream (one <strong>of</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ard treatments for this<br />
condition) relieves pain gradually over 2 weeks, while the essential oil acted within minutes.<br />
Geranium essential oil applied cutaneously in animal studies has suppressed cellular inflammation<br />
<strong>and</strong> neutrophil accumulation in inflammatory sites (Maruyama et al., 2006) but postherpetic<br />
neuralgia normally occurs after the inflammation has subsided. One <strong>of</strong> the main components <strong>of</strong> the<br />
essential oil, geraniol, <strong>and</strong> the minor components <strong>of</strong> geranial, nerol, <strong>and</strong> neral, have been shown to<br />
interact with the transient receptor potential channel, TRPV1, as does capsaicin (Stotz et al., 2008).<br />
This sensory inhibition may explain the efficacy <strong>of</strong> topical geranium oil.<br />
11.12.8 POSTOPERATIVE PAIN<br />
A r<strong>and</strong>omized, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted to determine whether the inhalation<br />
<strong>of</strong> lavender essential oil could reduce opioid requirements after laparoscopic adjustable gastric<br />
b<strong>and</strong>ing. In the postanesthesia care unit, 54 patients were given either lavender (two drops <strong>of</strong> a 2%<br />
dilution) or nonscented oil in a face mask. It was found that patients in the lavender group required<br />
significantly less morphine postoperatively than the placebo group (2.38 <strong>and</strong> 4.26 mg, respectively).<br />
Moreover, significantly more patients in the placebo group required analgesics in comparison with<br />
the lavender group; 82% compared to 46% (Kim et al., 2007).<br />
A similar study in the previous year with 50 patients who had undergone breast biopsy surgery<br />
had found that lavender essential oil had no significant effect on postoperative pain or analgesic<br />
requirements. However, a significantly higher satisfaction with pain control was noted by patients in<br />
the lavender group (Kim et al., 2006).<br />
11.12.9 PROSTATITIS<br />
One study has evaluated the use <strong>of</strong> Rowatinex for the treatment <strong>of</strong> chronic prostatitis/chronic<br />
pelvic pain syndrome, the rationale being based on the known anti-inflammatory properties <strong>of</strong> the<br />
product. A 6-week, r<strong>and</strong>omized single-blind trial compared the use <strong>of</strong> Rowatinex 200 mg thrice<br />
daily with ibupr<strong>of</strong>en 600 mg thrice daily in 50 patients. Efficacy was measured by the National<br />
Institutes <strong>of</strong> Health (NIH)-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) that was completed by<br />
the patients on four occasions. The decrease in the NIH-CPSI was significant in both groups at the<br />
end <strong>of</strong> treatment <strong>and</strong> a 25% improvement in the total score was superior in the Rowatinex group<br />
(68%) compared to the ibupr<strong>of</strong>en group (40%). Although the symptomatic response was significant,<br />
no patients became asymptomatic (Lee et al., 2006).<br />
11.12.10 PRURITIS<br />
Pruritis is one <strong>of</strong> the most common complications <strong>of</strong> patients undergoing hemodialysis. Thirteen such<br />
patients were given an arm massage with lavender <strong>and</strong> tea tree essential oils (5% dilution in sweet<br />
almond <strong>and</strong> jojoba oil) thrice a week for 4 weeks. A control group received no intervention. Pruritis<br />
score, pruritis-related biochemical markers, skin pH, <strong>and</strong> skin hydration were measured before <strong>and</strong><br />
after the study. There was a significant decrease in the pruritis score <strong>and</strong> blood urea nitrogen level for<br />
the test group. The control group showed a decreased skin hydration between pre- <strong>and</strong> post-test whereas<br />
for the essential oil group it was significantly increased (Ro et al., 2002). The lack <strong>of</strong> a massage only<br />
group in the study meant that the effects could not be definitely associated with the essential oils.<br />
11.13 PEDICULICIDAL ACTIVITY<br />
The activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils against the human head louse, Pediculus humanus capitis, has<br />
been investigated in a number <strong>of</strong> reports. Numerous essential oils have been found to exhibit
Phytotherapeutic Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 333<br />
pediculicidal activity in vitro, with common oils such as Eucalyptus globulus, Origanum marjorana,<br />
Rosmarinus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis, <strong>and</strong> Elettaria cardamomum being comparable to, or more effective<br />
than d-phenothrin <strong>and</strong> pyrethrum (Yang et al., 2004). Melaleuca alternifolia <strong>and</strong> Lav<strong>and</strong>ula<br />
angustifolia have also been found to be highly effective pediculicidal agents (Willimason<br />
et al., 2007).<br />
Despite the availability <strong>of</strong> positive in vitro results, only one trial involving application to humans<br />
has been documented; a mixture <strong>of</strong> anise <strong>and</strong> ylang ylang essential oils in coconut extract (Paranix ® )<br />
was applied once to five children. Viable lice were not found after 7 days (Scanni <strong>and</strong> Bonifazi,<br />
2006).<br />
11.14 RECURRENT APHTHOUS STOMATITIS<br />
Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS), also known as canker sores, are the most common oral<br />
mucosal lesions <strong>and</strong> although the process is sometimes self-limiting, the ulcer activity is mostly<br />
continuous <strong>and</strong> some forms may last for 20 years. Predisposing agents include bacteria <strong>and</strong> fungi,<br />
stress, mouth trauma, certain medications, <strong>and</strong> food allergies. Two essential oils both endemic to<br />
Iran have been investigated for treatment <strong>of</strong> this condition: Zataria multifl ora, a thyme-like plant<br />
containing thymol, carvacrol, <strong>and</strong> linalool as major components, <strong>and</strong> Satureja khuzistanica containing<br />
predominantly carvacrol.<br />
In a double-blind, r<strong>and</strong>omized study, 60 patients with RAS received either 30 mL <strong>of</strong> an<br />
oral mouthwash composed <strong>of</strong> 60 mg <strong>of</strong> Zataria multifl ora essential oil in an aqueous-alcoholic solution<br />
or placebo thrice daily for 4 weeks. In the treatment group, 83% <strong>of</strong> patients responded well<br />
while 17% reported a deterioration <strong>of</strong> their condition. This was compared with 13% <strong>and</strong> 87% for the<br />
placebo group, respectively. A significant clinical improvement with regard to less pain <strong>and</strong> shorter<br />
duration <strong>of</strong> the condition was found in the essential oil group (Mansoori et al., 2002).<br />
Satureja khuzistanica essential oil 0.2% v/v was prepared in a hydroalcoholic solution <strong>and</strong> used<br />
in double-blind, r<strong>and</strong>omized trial with 60 RAS patients. Its activity was compared with a 25%<br />
hydroalcoholic extract <strong>of</strong> the same plant <strong>and</strong> a hydroalcoholic placebo. A cotton pad was impregnated<br />
with 5 drops <strong>of</strong> preparation <strong>and</strong> placed on the ulcers for 1 min (fasting for 30 min afterwards)<br />
four times a day. The results <strong>of</strong> the extract <strong>and</strong> the essential oil groups were similar, with a significantly<br />
lower time for both pain elimination <strong>and</strong> complete healing <strong>of</strong> the ulcers in comparison with<br />
the placebo (Amanlou et al., 2007). The reported antibacterial, analgesic, antioxidant, <strong>and</strong> antiinflammatory<br />
activities <strong>of</strong> this essential oil (Abdollahi et al., 2003; Amanlou et al., 2004, 2005)<br />
were thought responsible for the result.<br />
11.15 RESPIRATORY TRACT<br />
Given the volatile nature <strong>of</strong> essential oils, it should come as no surprise that their ability to directly<br />
reach the site <strong>of</strong> intended activity via inhalation therapy has led to their use in the treatment <strong>of</strong> a<br />
range <strong>of</strong> respiratory conditions. Moreover, a number <strong>of</strong> components are effective when taken internally,<br />
since they are bioactive at the level <strong>of</strong> bronchial secretions during their excretion. With the<br />
exception <strong>of</strong> one report, all <strong>of</strong> the research has used the individual components <strong>of</strong> either 1,8-cineole<br />
or menthol, or has employed them in combination with several other isolated essential oil components<br />
within commercial preparations.<br />
11.15.1 MENTHOL<br />
Menthol-containing essential oils have been used in the therapy <strong>of</strong> respiratory conditions for many<br />
years <strong>and</strong> the individual component is present in a wide range <strong>of</strong> over-the-counter medications. Of<br />
the eight optical isomers <strong>of</strong> menthol, l-(-)-menthol is the most abundant in nature <strong>and</strong> imparts a<br />
cooling sensation to the skin <strong>and</strong> mucous membranes.
334 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Menthol is known to react with a temperature-sensitive (8–28°C range) transient receptor potential<br />
channel, leading to an increase in intracellular calcium, depolarization <strong>and</strong> initiation <strong>of</strong> an<br />
action potential (Jordt et al., 2003). This channel, known as TRPM8, is expressed in distinct populations<br />
<strong>of</strong> afferent neurons; primarily thinly myelinated Ad cool fibers <strong>and</strong> to a lesser extent, unmyelinated<br />
C-fiber nociceptors (Thut et al., 2003). It is the interaction with the TRPM8 thermoreceptor<br />
that is responsible for the cooling effect <strong>of</strong> menthol when it is applied to the skin. This activity is not<br />
confined to the dermis, since the presence <strong>of</strong> TRPM8 has been demonstrated by animal<br />
experimentation in the squamous epithelium <strong>of</strong> the nasal vestibule (Clarke et al., 1992), the larynx<br />
(Sant’Ambrogio et al., 1991), <strong>and</strong> lung tissue (Wright et al., 1998). Thus the activation <strong>of</strong> cold receptors<br />
via inhaled menthol leads to a number <strong>of</strong> beneficial effects.<br />
11.15.1.1 Antitussive<br />
Despite being used as a component in cough remedies since the introduction <strong>of</strong> a “vaporub” in 1890,<br />
there are few human trials <strong>of</strong> menthol used alone as being effective. In a citric acid-induced cough<br />
model in healthy subjects, Packman <strong>and</strong> London (1980) found that menthol was effective, although<br />
1,8-cineole was more efficacious. The use <strong>of</strong> an aromatic unction rather than direct inhalation may<br />
have affected the results, since the inhalation <strong>of</strong> menthol has been shown in animal models to be<br />
significantly more effective at cough frequency reduction (28% <strong>and</strong> 56% at 10 <strong>and</strong> 30 g/l, respectively)<br />
compared to 1,8-cineole (Laude et al., 1994).<br />
A single-blind pseudor<strong>and</strong>omized crossover trial in 42 healthy children was used to compare the<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> an inhalation <strong>of</strong> either menthol or placebo on citric acid-induced cough. It was found that<br />
cough frequency was reduced in comparison with the baseline but not to that <strong>of</strong> the placebo (Kenia<br />
et al., 2008). However, the placebo chosen was eucalyptus oil, whose main component is 1,8-cineole<br />
<strong>and</strong> known to have similar antitussive properties to menthol.<br />
Along with other ion channel modulators, menthol is recognized as a potential “novel therapy”<br />
for the treatment <strong>of</strong> chronic cough (Morice et al., 2004, p. 489). It is not clear whether the antitussive<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> menthol is due solely to its stimulation <strong>of</strong> airway cold receptors; it may also involve pulmonary<br />
C-fibers (a percentage <strong>of</strong> which also express TRPM8) or there may be a specific interaction<br />
with the neuronal cough reflex.<br />
11.15.1.2 Nasal Decongestant<br />
Menthol is <strong>of</strong>ten thought <strong>of</strong> as a decongestant, but this effect is a sensory illusion. Burrow et al.<br />
(1983) <strong>and</strong> Eccles et al. (1988) showed that there was no change in nasal resistance to airflow during<br />
inhalation <strong>of</strong> menthol, although the sensation <strong>of</strong> nasal airflow was enhanced. In the former experiment,<br />
1,8-cineole <strong>and</strong> camphor were also shown to enhance the sensation <strong>of</strong> airflow, but to a lesser<br />
extent than menthol.<br />
In a double-blind, r<strong>and</strong>omized trial subjects suffering from the common cold were given lozenges<br />
containing 11 mg <strong>of</strong> menthol. Posterior rhinomanometry could detect no change in nasal<br />
resistance to airflow after 10 min; however, there were significant changes in the nasal sensation <strong>of</strong><br />
airflow (Eccles et al., 1990).<br />
A single-blind pseudor<strong>and</strong>omized crossover trial compared the effect <strong>of</strong> an inhalation <strong>of</strong><br />
either menthol or placebo. The main outcome measures were nasal expiratory <strong>and</strong> inspiratory flows<br />
<strong>and</strong> volumes, as measured by a spirometer <strong>and</strong> the perception <strong>of</strong> nasal patency, assessed with a<br />
visual analogue scale. It was found that there was no effect <strong>of</strong> menthol on any <strong>of</strong> the spirometric<br />
measurements although there was a significant increase in the perception <strong>of</strong> nasal patency (Kenia<br />
et al., 2008).<br />
Thus it has been demonstrated that menthol is not a nasal decongestant. However, it is useful in<br />
therapy since stimulation <strong>of</strong> the cold receptors causes a subjective sensation <strong>of</strong> nasal decongestion<br />
<strong>and</strong> so relieves the feeling <strong>of</strong> a blocked nose. In commercial preparations that include menthol, a<br />
true decongestant such as oxymetazoline hydrochloride is <strong>of</strong>ten present.
Phytotherapeutic Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 335<br />
11.15.1.3 Inhibition <strong>of</strong> Respiratory Drive <strong>and</strong> Respiratory Comfort<br />
When cold air was circulated through the nose in human breath-hold experiments, subjects were<br />
able to hold their breath longer (McBride <strong>and</strong> Whitelaw, 1981) <strong>and</strong> inhaling cold air was shown to<br />
inhibit normal breathing patterns (Burgess <strong>and</strong> Whitelaw, 1988). This indicated that cold receptors<br />
could be one source <strong>of</strong> monitoring inspiratory flow rate <strong>and</strong> volume. Several animal experiments<br />
demonstrated that the inhalation <strong>of</strong> cold air, warm air, plus menthol, or menthol alone (390 ng/mL)<br />
significantly enhanced ventilator inhibition (Orani et al., 1991; Sant’Ambrogio et al., 1992).<br />
Sloan et al. (1993) conducted breath-hold experiments with 20 healthy volunteers. The ingestion<br />
<strong>of</strong> a lozenge containing 11 mg <strong>of</strong> menthol significantly increased the hold time, indicating a<br />
depression <strong>of</strong> the ventilatory drive. It was later postulated by Eccles (2000) that in addition to<br />
chemoreceptors detecting oxygen <strong>and</strong> carbon dioxide in the blood, cold receptors in the respiratory<br />
tract may also modulate the drive to breathe.<br />
Eleven healthy subjects breathed through a device that had either an elastic load or a flowresistive<br />
load. Sensations <strong>of</strong> respiratory discomfort were compared using a visual analogue scale<br />
before, during, <strong>and</strong> after inhalation <strong>of</strong> menthol. It was found that the discomfort associated with<br />
loaded breathing was significantly reduced <strong>and</strong> was more effective during flow-resistive loading<br />
than elastic loading. Inhalation <strong>of</strong> another fragrance had no effect <strong>and</strong> so the result was attributed to<br />
a direct stimulation <strong>of</strong> cold receptors by menthol, a reduction in respiratory drive being perhaps<br />
responsible (Nishino et al., 1997).<br />
During an investigation <strong>of</strong> dyspnea, the effect <strong>of</strong> menthol inhalation on respiratory discomfort<br />
during loaded breathing was found to be inconsistent. Further tests found that the effect <strong>of</strong> menthol<br />
was most important during the first few minutes <strong>of</strong> inhalation <strong>and</strong> in the presence <strong>of</strong> high loads<br />
(Peiffer et al., 2001). The therapeutic application <strong>of</strong> menthol in the alleviation <strong>of</strong> dyspnea has yet to<br />
be described.<br />
11.15.1.4 Bronchodilation <strong>and</strong> Airway Hyperresponsiveness<br />
The spasmolytic activity <strong>of</strong> menthol on airway smooth muscle has been demonstrated in vitro<br />
(Taddei et al., 1988). To examine the bronchodilatory effects <strong>of</strong> menthol, a small trial was conducted<br />
on six patients with mild to moderate asthma. A poultice-containing menthol was applied daily for<br />
4 weeks <strong>and</strong> it was found that bronchoconstriction was decreased <strong>and</strong> airway hyperresponsiveness<br />
improved (Chiyotani et al., 1994b).<br />
A r<strong>and</strong>omized, placebo-controlled trial examined the effects <strong>of</strong> menthol (10 mg nebulized twice<br />
daily for 4 weeks) on airway hyperresponsiveness in 23 patients with mild to moderate asthma. The<br />
diurnal variation in the peak expiratory flow rate (a value reflecting airway hyperexcitability) was<br />
decreased but the forced expiratory volume was not significantly altered. This indicated an improvement<br />
<strong>of</strong> airway hyperresponsiveness without affecting airflow limitation (Tamaoki et al., 1995).<br />
Later in vivo research examined the effect <strong>of</strong> menthol on airway resistance caused by capsaicin- <strong>and</strong><br />
neurokinin-induced bronchoconstriction; there was a significant decrease in both cases by inhalation<br />
<strong>of</strong> menthol at 7.5 μg/L air concentration. The in vitro effect <strong>of</strong> menthol on bronchial rings was<br />
also studied. It was concluded that menthol attenuated bronchoconstriction by a direct action on<br />
bronchial smooth muscle (Wright et al., 1997).<br />
In cases <strong>of</strong> asthma, the beneficial effects <strong>of</strong> menthol seem to be mainly due to its bronchodilatory<br />
activity on smooth muscle; interaction with cold receptors <strong>and</strong> the respiratory drive may also play<br />
an important role.<br />
Recent in vitro studies have shown that a subpopulation <strong>of</strong> airway vagal afferent nerves expresses<br />
TRPM8 receptors <strong>and</strong> that activation <strong>of</strong> these receptors by cold <strong>and</strong> menthol excite these airway<br />
autonomic nerves. Thus, activation <strong>of</strong> TRPM8 receptors may provoke an autonomic nerve reflex to<br />
increase airway resistance. It was postulated that this autonomic response could provoke mentholor<br />
cold-induced exacerbation <strong>of</strong> asthma <strong>and</strong> other pulmonary disorders (Xing et al., 2008). Direct
336 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
cold stimulation or inhalation <strong>of</strong> menthol can cause immediate airway constriction <strong>and</strong> asthma in<br />
some people; perhaps the TRPM8 receptor expression is upregulated in these subjects. The situation<br />
is far from clear.<br />
11.15.1.5 Summary<br />
The respiratory effects <strong>of</strong> menthol that have been demonstrated are as follows:<br />
1. Antitussive at low concentration.<br />
2. Increases the sensation <strong>of</strong> nasal airflow giving the impression <strong>of</strong> decongestion.<br />
3. No physical decongestant activity.<br />
4. Depresses ventilation <strong>and</strong> the respiratory drive at comparatively higher concentration.<br />
5. Reduces respiratory discomfort <strong>and</strong> sensations <strong>of</strong> dyspnea.<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> in vitro <strong>and</strong> animal experiments have demonstrated the bronchomucotropic activity<br />
<strong>of</strong> menthol (Boyd <strong>and</strong> Sheppard, 1969; Welsh et al., 1980; Chiyotani et al., 1994a), whereas there<br />
have been conflicting reports as to whether menthol is a mucociliary stimulant (Das et al., 1970) or<br />
is ciliotoxic (Su et al., 1993). Apart from the inclusion <strong>of</strong> relatively small quantities <strong>of</strong> menthol in<br />
commercial preparations that have known beneficial mucociliary effects, there are no documented<br />
human trials to support the presence <strong>of</strong> these activities.<br />
11.15.2 1,8-CINEOLE<br />
This oxide has a number <strong>of</strong> biological activities that make it particularly useful in the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
the respiratory tract. 1,8-Cineole has been registered as a licensed medication in Germany for over<br />
20 years <strong>and</strong> is available as enteric-coated capsules (Soledum ® ). It is therefore not surprising that<br />
the majority <strong>of</strong> the trials originate from this country <strong>and</strong> use oral dosing <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole instead <strong>of</strong><br />
inhalation. Rather than discuss specific pathologies, the individual activities will be examined <strong>and</strong><br />
their relevance (alone or in combination) in treatment regimes should become apparent.<br />
11.15.2.1 Antimicrobial<br />
The anti-infectious properties <strong>of</strong> essential oils high in 1,8-cineole content may warrant their inclusion<br />
into a treatment regime but other components are more effective in this regard. 1,8-Cineole is<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten considered to have marginal or no antibacterial activity (Kotan et al., 2007), although it is very<br />
effective at causing leakage <strong>of</strong> bacterial cell membranes (Carson et al., 2002). It may thus allow<br />
more active components to enter the bacteria by permeabilizing their membranes.<br />
1,8-Cineole does possess noted antiviral properties compared to the common essential oil components<br />
<strong>of</strong> borneol, citral, geraniol, limonene, linalool, menthol, <strong>and</strong> thymol; only that <strong>of</strong> eugenol<br />
was greater (Bourne et al., 1999). However, in comparison with the potent thujone, the antiviral<br />
potential <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole was considered relatively low (Sivropoulou et al., 1997).<br />
A placebo-controlled, double-blind, r<strong>and</strong>omized parallel-group trial examined the long-term treatment<br />
<strong>of</strong> 246 chronic bronchitics during winter with myrtol st<strong>and</strong>ardized Gelomyrtol ® forte. This<br />
established German preparation consists mainly <strong>of</strong> 15% a-pinene, 35% limonene, <strong>and</strong> 47% 1,8-cineole<br />
<strong>and</strong> was administered thrice daily in 300 mg capsules. It was found to reduce the requirement for<br />
antibiotics during acute exacerbations; 51.6% compared to 61.2% under placebo. Of those patients<br />
needing antibiotics, 62.5% in the test group required them for £7 days whereas 76.7% <strong>of</strong> patients in the<br />
placebo group needed antibiotics for more than 7 days. Moreover, 72% <strong>of</strong> patients remained without<br />
acute exacerbations in the test group compared to 53% in the placebo group (Meister et al., 1999).<br />
Although emphasis was given to antibiotic reduction, a significant antimicrobial effect by the<br />
preparation is unlikely to have paid an important contribution. Indeed, Meister et al. refer to reduced<br />
health impairment due to sputum expectoration <strong>and</strong> cough, <strong>and</strong> note other beneficial properties <strong>of</strong><br />
1,8-cineole that will be discussed in Sections 11.15.2.2 through 11.15.2.6.
Phytotherapeutic Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 337<br />
11.15.2.2 Antitussive<br />
The antitussive effects <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole were first proven by Packman <strong>and</strong> London in 1980, who<br />
induced coughing in 32 healthy human subjects via the use <strong>of</strong> an aerosol spray containing citric<br />
acid. This single-blind crossover study examined the effect <strong>of</strong> a commercially available chest rub<br />
containing, among others, eucalyptus essential oil. The rub was applied to the chest in a 7.5 mg dose<br />
<strong>and</strong> massaged for 10–15 s after which the frequency <strong>of</strong> the induced coughing was noted. It was<br />
found that the chest rub produced a significant decrease in the induced cough counts <strong>and</strong> that<br />
eucalyptus oil was the most active component <strong>of</strong> the rub.<br />
1,8-Cineole interacts with TRPM8, the cool-sensitive thermoreceptor that is primarily affected by<br />
menthol. In comparison with menthol, the effect <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole on TRPM8 (as measured by Ca 2+ influx<br />
kinetics) is much slower <strong>and</strong> declines more rapidly (Behrendt et al., 2004). In a similar manner to menthol,<br />
the antitussive activity <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole may be due in part to its stimulation <strong>of</strong> airway cold receptors.<br />
11.15.2.3 Bronchodilation<br />
In vitro tests using guinea pig trachea determined that the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus tereticornis<br />
had a myorelaxant, dose-dependent effect (10–1000 mg/mL) on airway smooth muscle, reducing<br />
tracheal basal tone <strong>and</strong> K + -induced contractions, as well as attenuating acetylcholine-induced<br />
contractions at higher concentrations (Coelho-de-Souza et al., 2005). This activity was found to<br />
be mainly due to 1,8-cineole, although the overall effect was thought due to a synergistic relationship<br />
between the oxide <strong>and</strong> a- <strong>and</strong> b-pinene. Similar results were obtained using the essential oil<br />
<strong>of</strong> Croton nepetaefolius, whose major component was also 1,8-cineole (Magalhães et al., 2003).<br />
A double-blind, r<strong>and</strong>omized clinical trial over 7 days compared oral pure 1,8-cineole (3 ¥ 200 mg/<br />
day) to Ambroxol (3 ¥ 30 mg/day) in 29 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).<br />
Vital capacity, airway resistance, <strong>and</strong> specific airway conductance improved significantly for both<br />
drugs, whereas the intrathoracic gas volume was reduced by 1,8-cineole but not by Ambroxol. All<br />
parameters <strong>of</strong> lung function, peak flow, <strong>and</strong> symptoms <strong>of</strong> dyspnea were improved by 1,8-cineole<br />
therapy, but were not statistically significant in comparison with Ambroxol due to the small number<br />
<strong>of</strong> patients. In addition to other properties, it was noted that the oxide seemed to have bronchodilatory<br />
effects (Wittman et al., 1998).<br />
11.15.2.4 Mucolytic <strong>and</strong> Mucociliary Effects<br />
Mucolytics break down or dissolve mucus <strong>and</strong> thus facilitate the easier removal <strong>of</strong> these secretions<br />
from the respiratory tract by the ciliated epithelium, a process known as mucociliary clearance.<br />
Some mucolytics also have a direct action on the mucociliary apparatus itself.<br />
Administered via steam inhalation to rabbits, 1,8-cineole in concentrations that produced a barely<br />
detectable scent (1–9 mg/kg) augmented the volume output <strong>of</strong> respiratory tract fluid from 9.5% to<br />
45.3% (Boyd <strong>and</strong> Sheppard, 1971), an effect that they described as “mucotropic.” Interestingly, in the<br />
same experiment fenchone at 9 mg/kg increased the output by 186.2%, thus confirming the strong<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> some ketones in this regard. Also using rabbits, Zanker (1983) found that oxygenated monoterpenoids<br />
reduced mucus deposition <strong>and</strong> partially recovered the activity <strong>of</strong> ciliated epithelium.<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> these early animal experiments, the beneficial effects <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole on mucociliary<br />
clearance have been clearly demonstrated in a number <strong>of</strong> human trials. Dorow et al. (1987) examined<br />
the effects <strong>of</strong> a 7-day course <strong>of</strong> either Gelomyrtol forte (4 ¥ 300 mg/day) or Ambroxol<br />
(3 ¥ 30 mg/day) in 20 patients with chronic obstructive bronchitis. Improved mucociliary clearance<br />
was observed in both groups, although improvement in lung function was not detected.<br />
Twelve patients with chronic obstructive bronchitis were given a 4-day treatment with 1,8- cineole<br />
(4 ¥ 200 mg/day). By measuring the reduction in percentage radioactivity <strong>of</strong> an applied radioaerosol,<br />
significant improvements in mucociliary clearance were demonstrated at the 60 <strong>and</strong> 120 min after<br />
each administration (Dorow, 1989).<br />
In a small double-blind study, the expectorant effect <strong>of</strong> Gelomyrtol forte (1 ¥ 300 mg/day,<br />
14 days) was examined in 20 patients with chronic obstructive bronchitis. The ability to expectorate,
338 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
frequency <strong>of</strong> coughing attacks, <strong>and</strong> shortness <strong>of</strong> breath were all improved by the therapy, as was<br />
sputum volume <strong>and</strong> color. Both patients <strong>and</strong> physicians rated the effects <strong>of</strong> Gelomyrtol forte as<br />
better than the placebo, but due to the small group size statistically significant differences could not<br />
be demonstrated (Ulmer <strong>and</strong> Schött, 1991).<br />
A r<strong>and</strong>omized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was used to investigate the use <strong>of</strong> mucolytics<br />
to alleviate acute bronchitis (Mattys et al., 2000). They compared Gelomyrtol forte (4 ¥ 300 mg,<br />
days 1–14), with Ambroxol (3 ¥ 30 mg, days 1–3; 2 ¥ 30 mg, days 4–14) <strong>and</strong> Cefuroxime (2 ¥ 250 mg,<br />
days 1–6) in 676 patients. By monitoring cough frequency data, regression <strong>of</strong> the frequency <strong>of</strong><br />
abnormal auscultation, hoarseness, headache, joint pain, <strong>and</strong> fatigue, it was shown that Gelomyrtol<br />
forte was very efficacious <strong>and</strong> comparable to the other active treatments. Overall, it scored slightly<br />
more than Ambroxol <strong>and</strong> Cefuroxime <strong>and</strong> was therefore considered to be a well-evidenced alternative<br />
to antibiotics for acute bronchitis.<br />
Several studies have demonstrated a direct effect <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole on the ciliated epithelium itself.<br />
Kaspar et al. (1994) conducted a r<strong>and</strong>omized, double-blind three-way crossover 4-day study <strong>of</strong> the<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole (3 ¥ 200 mg/day) or Ambroxol (3 ¥ 30 mg/day) on mucociliary clearance in<br />
30 patients with COPD. Treatment with the oxide resulted in a statistically significant increase in the<br />
ciliary beat frequency <strong>of</strong> nasal cilia, a phenomenon that did not occur with the use <strong>of</strong> Ambroxol (an<br />
increase <strong>of</strong> 8.2% <strong>and</strong> 1.1%, respectively). A decrease <strong>of</strong> “saccharine-time” was clinically relevant<br />
<strong>and</strong> significant after 1,8-cineole therapy (241 s) but not after Ambroxol (48 s). Lung function parameters<br />
were significantly improved equally by both drugs.<br />
After the ingestion <strong>of</strong> Gelomyrtol forte (3 ¥ 1 capsule/day for 4 days) by four healthy persons <strong>and</strong><br />
one person after sinus surgery, there was a strong increase in mucociliary transport velocity, as<br />
detected by movement <strong>of</strong> a radiolabeled component (Behrbohm et al., 1995).<br />
In sinusitis, the ciliated beat frequency is reduced <strong>and</strong> 30% <strong>of</strong> ciliated cells convert to mucussecreting<br />
goblet cells. The impaired mucociliary transport, excessive secretion <strong>of</strong> mucus, <strong>and</strong> edema<br />
block drainage sites leading to congestion, pain, <strong>and</strong> pressure.<br />
To demonstrate the importance <strong>of</strong> drainage <strong>and</strong> ventilation <strong>of</strong> sinuses as a therapeutic concept,<br />
Federspil et al. (1997) conducted a double-blind, r<strong>and</strong>omized, placebo-controlled trial using<br />
331 patients with acute sinusitis. The secretolytic effects <strong>of</strong> Gelomyrtol forte (300 mg) over a 6-day<br />
period proved to be significantly better than the placebo.<br />
Kehrl et al. (2004) used the known stimulatory effects <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole on ciliated epithelium <strong>and</strong> its<br />
mucolytic effect as a rationale for treating 152 acute rhinosinusitis patients in a r<strong>and</strong>omized, doubleblind,<br />
placebo-controlled study. The treatment group received 3 ¥ 200 mg 1,8-cineole daily for 7<br />
days. There was a clinically relevant <strong>and</strong> significant improvement in frontal headache, headache on<br />
bending, pressure point sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the trigeminal nerve, nasal obstruction, <strong>and</strong> rhinological secretions<br />
in the test group, as compared to the control group. It was concluded that 1,8-cineole was a safe<br />
<strong>and</strong> effective treatment for acute nonpurulent rhinosinusitis before antibiotics are indicated.<br />
11.15.2.5 Anti-Inflammatory Activity<br />
The effects <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole on stimulated human monocyte mediator production were studied in vitro<br />
<strong>and</strong> compared with that <strong>of</strong> budesonide, a corticosteroid agent with anti-inflammatory <strong>and</strong> immunosuppresive<br />
effects (Juergens et al., 1998a). At therapeutic levels, both substances demonstrated a<br />
similar inhibition <strong>of</strong> the inflammatory mediators leukotriene B 4 (LTB 4 ), PGE 2 , <strong>and</strong> interleukin-1b<br />
(IL-1b). This was the first evidence <strong>of</strong> a steroid-like inhibition <strong>of</strong> arachidonic acid metabolism <strong>and</strong><br />
IL-1b production by 1,8-cineole.<br />
Later that year, the same team (Juergens et al., 1998b) reported a dose-dependent <strong>and</strong> highly<br />
significant inhibition <strong>of</strong> tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a), IL-1b, thromboxane B 2 , <strong>and</strong> LTB 4 production<br />
by 1,8-cineole from stimulated human monocytes in vitro.<br />
A third experiment combined ex vivo <strong>and</strong> in vivo testing; 10 patients with bronchial asthma were<br />
given 3 ¥ 200 mg <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole daily for 3 days. Lung function was measured before the first dose, at<br />
the end <strong>of</strong> the third dose <strong>and</strong> 4 days after discontinuation <strong>of</strong> the therapy. At the same time, blood
Phytotherapeutic Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 339<br />
samples were taken from which monocytes were collected <strong>and</strong> stimulated ex vivo for LTB 4 <strong>and</strong> PGE 2<br />
production. Twelve healthy volunteers also underwent the treatment <strong>and</strong> their blood was taken for testing.<br />
It was found that by the end <strong>of</strong> the treatment <strong>and</strong> 4 days after, the production <strong>of</strong> LTB 4 <strong>and</strong> PGE 2<br />
from the monocytes <strong>of</strong> both asthmatics <strong>and</strong> healthy individuals was significantly inhibited. Lung<br />
function parameters <strong>of</strong> asthmatic patients were significantly improved (Juergens et al., 1998c).<br />
These three reports suggested a strong anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole via both the<br />
cyclooxygenase <strong>and</strong> 5-lipooxygenase pathways, <strong>and</strong> the possibility <strong>of</strong> a new, well-tolerated treatment<br />
<strong>of</strong> airway inflammation in obstructive airway disease.<br />
Juergens et al. (2003) conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial involving<br />
32 patients with steroid-dependent severe bronchial asthma. The subjects were r<strong>and</strong>omly assigned<br />
to receive either a placebo or a 3 ¥ 200 mg 1,8-cineole daily for 12 weeks. Oral glucocorticosteroids<br />
were reduced by 2.5 mg increments every 3 weeks with the aim <strong>of</strong> establishing the glucocorticosteroid-sparing<br />
capacity <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole. The majority <strong>of</strong> asthma patients receiving oral<br />
1,8-cineole remained clinically stable despite a mean reduction <strong>of</strong> oral prednisolone dosage <strong>of</strong> 36%,<br />
equivalent to 3.8 mg/day. In the placebo group, where only four patients could tolerate a steroid<br />
decrease, the mean reduction was 7%, equivalent to 0.9 mg/day. Compared with the placebo group,<br />
1,8-cineole recipients maintained their lung function four times longer despite receiving lower<br />
doses <strong>of</strong> prednisolone.<br />
Increased mucus secretion <strong>of</strong>ten appears as an initial symptom in exacerbated COPD <strong>and</strong> asthma,<br />
where stimulated mediator cells migrate to the lungs to produce cytokines; <strong>of</strong> particular importance<br />
are TNF-a, IL-1b, IL-6, <strong>and</strong> IL-8 <strong>and</strong> those known to induce immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody<br />
synthesis <strong>and</strong> maintain allergic eosinophilic inflammation (IL-4 <strong>and</strong> IL-5). Therefore, a study was<br />
conducted to investigate the role <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole in inhibiting cytokine production in stimulated<br />
human monocytes <strong>and</strong> lymphocytes in vitro (Juergens et al., 2004). It was shown that 1,8-cineole is<br />
a strong inhibitor <strong>of</strong> TNF-a <strong>and</strong> IL-1b in both cell types. At known therapeutic blood levels, it also<br />
had an inhibitory effect on the production <strong>of</strong> the chemotactic cytokines IL-8 <strong>and</strong> IL-5 <strong>and</strong> may<br />
possess additional antiallergic activity by blocking IL-4 production.<br />
A clinically relevant anti-inflammatory activity <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole has thus been proven for therapeutic<br />
use in airway diseases.<br />
11.15.2.6 Pulmonary Function<br />
An inhaler was used to apply 1,8-cineole (Soledum Balm) to 24 patients with asthma or chronic<br />
bronchitis in an 8-day-controlled trial. In all but one patient, an objective rise in expiratory peak<br />
flow values was demonstrated. The subjective experience <strong>of</strong> their illness was significantly improved<br />
for all subjects (Grimm, 1987).<br />
In an open trial <strong>of</strong> 100 chronic bronchitics using both inhaled (4 ¥ 200 mg) <strong>and</strong> oral (3 ¥ 200 mg)<br />
1,8-cineole over 7 days, the clinical parameters <strong>of</strong> forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume,<br />
peak expiratory flow, <strong>and</strong> residual volume were all significantly improved when compared to initial<br />
values before treatment (Mahlo, 1990).<br />
In a r<strong>and</strong>omized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study <strong>of</strong> 51 patients with COPD, 1,8-cineole<br />
(3 ¥ 200 mg/day) was given for 8 weeks. For the objective lung functions <strong>of</strong> “airway resistance” <strong>and</strong><br />
“specific airway resistance,” there was a clinically significant reduction <strong>of</strong> 21% <strong>and</strong> 26%, respectively.<br />
The improvement was attributed to a positive influence on disturbed breathing patterns,<br />
mucociliary clearance, <strong>and</strong> anti-inflammatory effects (Habich <strong>and</strong> Repges, 1994).<br />
The majority <strong>of</strong> the in vivo trials involving 1,8-cineole report good, if not significant, changes in<br />
lung function parameters, whether the investigation concerns the common cold or COPD. This is<br />
not a convenient, accidental side effect <strong>of</strong> treatment but is a direct result <strong>of</strong> one or more <strong>of</strong> the factors<br />
already discussed that have direct effects on the pathophysiology <strong>of</strong> the airways. The ability to<br />
breathe more effectively <strong>and</strong> easily is an important consequence <strong>of</strong> the therapy that is sometimes<br />
minimized when dealing with the specific complexities <strong>of</strong> infection, inflammation, <strong>and</strong> so on.<br />
A compilation <strong>of</strong> human trials with 1,8-cineole is given in Table 11.3.
340 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Table 11.3<br />
Summary <strong>of</strong> Human Trials Demonstrating the Beneficial Effects <strong>of</strong> 1,8-Cineole in Various<br />
Respiratory Conditions<br />
Patients Treatment Outcome Reference<br />
11 Cineole inhalation,<br />
8 days<br />
10 Cineole 3 ¥ 200 mg<br />
daily, 3 days<br />
32 Cineole 3 ¥ 200 mg<br />
daily, 12 weeks<br />
Asthma<br />
Objective rise in expiratory peak flow found. Subjective<br />
experiences <strong>of</strong> illness significantly improved<br />
LTB 4 <strong>and</strong> PGE 2 production by monocytes was<br />
significantly inhibited. Lung functions were<br />
significantly improved<br />
Twelve <strong>of</strong> 16 patients in cineole group remained<br />
stable despite a 36% reduction in oral steroid dosage<br />
Acute bronchitis<br />
60 Vaporub 3 min Decreased breathing frequency, suggesting “easier<br />
breathing”<br />
676 Gelomyrtol<br />
4 ¥ 300 mg daily,<br />
14 days<br />
9 Cineole inhalation,<br />
8 days<br />
100 Cineole 3 ¥ 200 mg<br />
daily, 7 days<br />
246 Gelomyrtol<br />
3 ¥ 300 mg daily,<br />
6 months<br />
20 Gelomyrtol 4 ¥ 0.3 g<br />
daily, 7 days<br />
20 Gelomyrtol 1 ¥ 0.3 g<br />
daily, 14 days<br />
12 Cineole 4 ¥ 200 mg,<br />
4 days<br />
51 including<br />
16 asthmatics<br />
Cineole 3 ¥ 200 mg<br />
daily, 8 weeks<br />
30 Cineole 1 ¥ 200 mg<br />
daily, 4 days<br />
29 Cineole 3 ¥ 200 mg<br />
daily, 7 days<br />
24 Eucalyptus oil (9%<br />
<strong>of</strong> a mixture)<br />
331 Gelomyrtol 300 mg,<br />
6 days<br />
152 Cineole 3 ¥ 200 mg<br />
daily, 7 days<br />
Coughing, sputum consistency, well-being, bronchial<br />
hyperreactivity, <strong>and</strong> associated symptoms all improved<br />
similarly by Gelomyrtol, Ambroxol, <strong>and</strong> Cefuroxime<br />
Chronic bronchitis<br />
Objective rise in expiratory peak flow found. Subjective<br />
experiences <strong>of</strong> illness significantly improved<br />
Grimm (1987)<br />
Juergens et al.<br />
(1998c)<br />
Juergens et al.<br />
(2003)<br />
Berger et al.<br />
(1978a)<br />
Mattys et al.<br />
(2000)<br />
Grimm (1987)<br />
All lung function parameters significantly improved Mahlo (1990)<br />
Reduced acute exacerbations, reduced requirement<br />
for antibiotics, reduced treatment times when<br />
antibiotics taken. Well-being significantly improved<br />
COPD<br />
Improved mucociliary clearance<br />
All parameters relating to coughing improved.<br />
Sputum volume increased<br />
Meister et al.<br />
(1999)<br />
Dorow et al.<br />
(1987)<br />
Ulmer <strong>and</strong><br />
Schött (1991)<br />
Significant improvement <strong>of</strong> mucociliary clearance Dorow (1989)<br />
Significant improvement in airway resistance (21%),<br />
positive effects on sputum output <strong>and</strong> dyspnea<br />
Significant improvements in lung functions <strong>of</strong><br />
FVC <strong>and</strong> FEV 1 (Ambroxol <strong>and</strong> cineole equieffective),<br />
significant increase in ciliary beat frequency<br />
All lung function parameters, peak flow <strong>and</strong><br />
dyspnea improved from day 1 onward<br />
Common cold<br />
Reversed lung function abnormalities in small<br />
<strong>and</strong> large airways<br />
Sinusitis<br />
Effective treatment instead <strong>of</strong> antibiotics<br />
Effective reduction <strong>of</strong> symptoms without<br />
the need for antibiotics<br />
Habich <strong>and</strong><br />
Repges<br />
(1994)<br />
Kaspar et al.<br />
(1994)<br />
Wittmann<br />
et al. (1998)<br />
Cohen <strong>and</strong><br />
Dressler<br />
(1982)<br />
Federspil et al.<br />
(1997)<br />
Kehrl et al.<br />
(2004)
Phytotherapeutic Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 341<br />
11.15.2.7 Summary<br />
Although discussed separately, the multifaceted activities <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole perform together in harmony<br />
to provide an effective intervention that can inherently adapt to the needs <strong>of</strong> the individual<br />
patient. As already described, 1,8-cineole is known to possess the following properties:<br />
1. Antimicrobial<br />
2. Antitussive<br />
3. Bronchodilatory<br />
4. Mucolytic<br />
5. Ciliary transport promotion<br />
6. Anti-inflammatory<br />
7. Lung function improvement.<br />
Therefore, it may be seen that a diverse range <strong>of</strong> respiratory conditions <strong>of</strong> varying complexities<br />
will benefit from the use <strong>of</strong> pure 1,8-cineole or from essential oils containing this oxide as a major<br />
component.<br />
11.15.3 TREATMENT WITH BLENDS CONTAINING BOTH MENTHOL AND 1,8-CINEOLE<br />
A study measured transthoracic impedance pneumographs <strong>of</strong> 60 young children (2–40 months)<br />
with acute bronchitis before <strong>and</strong> after a 3-min application <strong>of</strong> Vaporub ® to the back <strong>and</strong> chest. The<br />
data showed an early increase in amplitude up to 33%, which slowly descended during the 70-min<br />
post-treatment period to slightly above the control. Breathing frequency progressively decreased<br />
during the same period by 19.4%. Clinical observations combined with these results suggested a<br />
condition <strong>of</strong> “easier breathing” (Berger et al., 1978a). Currently, the active ingredients <strong>of</strong> Vaporub<br />
are camphor 4.8%, 1,8-cineole 1.2%, <strong>and</strong> menthol 2.6, but these components <strong>and</strong> percentages may<br />
have changed over the years.<br />
The same team employed a similar experiment but used the pneumographic data to examine the<br />
quiet periods, that is, parts <strong>of</strong> the pneumogram where changes in the baseline were at least half <strong>of</strong> the<br />
average amplitude in more than five consecutive breathing excursions. It was found that the application<br />
<strong>of</strong> Vaporub increased quiet periods by up to 213.8%, whereas the controls (petroleum jelly application<br />
or rubbing only) never exceeded 62.4%. Thus the breathing restlessness <strong>of</strong> children with<br />
bronchitis was diminished <strong>and</strong> this was confirmed by clinical observations (Berger et al., 1978b).<br />
By the measurement <strong>of</strong> lung <strong>and</strong> forced expiratory volumes, nasal, lower, <strong>and</strong> total airway resistances,<br />
closing volume data, the phase III slope <strong>of</strong> the alveolar plateau, <strong>and</strong> the maximum expiratory<br />
flow volume, peripheral airway dysfunction was confirmed in 24 adults with common colds. In a<br />
r<strong>and</strong>omized, controlled trial, an aromatic mixture <strong>of</strong> menthol, eucalyptus oil, <strong>and</strong> camphor (56%,<br />
9%, <strong>and</strong> 35% w/w, respectively) were vaporized in a room where the subjects were seated. Respiratory<br />
function measurements were made at baseline, 20 <strong>and</strong> 60 min after exposure. After the last measurement,<br />
phenylephrine was sprayed into the nostrils <strong>and</strong> the measurements taken again 5–10 min later<br />
to determine potential airway responsiveness. The control consisted <strong>of</strong> tap water. The results showed<br />
significant changes in forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume, closing capacity, <strong>and</strong> the phase<br />
III slope after aromatic therapy as compared to the control. It was concluded that the aromatic inhalation<br />
favorably modified the peripheral airway dysfunction (Cohen <strong>and</strong> Dressler, 1982).<br />
In a r<strong>and</strong>omized, placebo-controlled trial <strong>of</strong> citric acid-induced cough in 20 healthy subjects, the<br />
inhalation <strong>of</strong> a combination <strong>of</strong> menthol <strong>and</strong> eucalyptus oil (75% <strong>and</strong> 25%, respectively) significantly<br />
decreased the cough frequency (Morice et al., 1994).<br />
The effect <strong>of</strong> an aromatic inunction (Vaporub) was studied by the inhalation <strong>of</strong> a radioaerosol in<br />
a r<strong>and</strong>omized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover trial with 12 chronic bronchitics. It was<br />
found that after the application <strong>of</strong> 7.5 g <strong>of</strong> the product to the chest, removal <strong>of</strong> the tracheobronchial
342 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
deposit was significantly enhanced at 30 <strong>and</strong> 60 min postinhalation, although further effects could<br />
not be demonstrated during the following 5 h, despite further application <strong>of</strong> the rub. During the first<br />
hour, mucociliary clearance was correlated with the concentration level <strong>of</strong> the aromatics (Hasani<br />
et al., 2003).<br />
Another commercial preparation Pinimenthol ® , a mixture <strong>of</strong> eucalyptus <strong>and</strong> pine needle oils plus<br />
menthol, reduced bronchospasm <strong>and</strong> demonstrated significant secretolytic effects when insufflated<br />
through the respiratory tract <strong>and</strong> when applied to the epilated skin <strong>of</strong> animals (Schäfer <strong>and</strong> Schäfer,<br />
1981). In addition to the known effects <strong>of</strong> menthol <strong>and</strong> 1,8-cineole, pine needle oil is considered to<br />
be weakly antiseptic <strong>and</strong> secretolytic (Approved Herbs, 1998).<br />
In a r<strong>and</strong>omized, double-blind 14-day trial, 100 patients with chronic obstructive bronchitis<br />
received a combination <strong>of</strong> theophylline with b-adrenergica 2–3 times daily. The test group also<br />
received Pinimenthol. The parameters were investigated were objective (measurement <strong>of</strong> lung function<br />
<strong>and</strong> sputum) <strong>and</strong> subjective (cough, respiratory insufficiency, <strong>and</strong> pulmonary murmur). All<br />
differences in the subjective evaluations were statistically significant <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> clinical importance;<br />
secretolysis was clearly shown. The addition <strong>of</strong> Pinimenthol showed a clear superiority to the basic<br />
combination therapy alone (Linsenmann <strong>and</strong> Swoboda, 1986).<br />
A postmarketing survey was conducted <strong>of</strong> 3060 patients prescribed Pinimenthol suffering from<br />
cold, acute or chronic bronchitis, bronchial catarrh, or hoarseness. The product was given by inunction<br />
(29.6%), inhalation (17.3%), or inunction <strong>and</strong> inhalation (53.1%). Only 22 patients reported<br />
adverse effects <strong>and</strong> the efficacy <strong>of</strong> the product was judged as excellent or good by 88.3% <strong>of</strong> physicians<br />
<strong>and</strong> 88.1% <strong>of</strong> patients (Kamin <strong>and</strong> Kieser, 2007).<br />
11.16 ALLERGIC RHINITIS<br />
In a pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> concept study, a nasal spray was made from the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Artemisia abrotanum<br />
L. (4 mg/mL) <strong>and</strong> flavonoid extracts (2.5 μg/mL) from the same plant. The essential oil consisted<br />
primarily <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole <strong>and</strong> davanone at approximately 40% <strong>and</strong> 50%, respectively. Apart<br />
from a spasmolytic activity (Perfumi et al., 1995), little is known about the biological activity <strong>of</strong><br />
davanone. The flavonoids present were thought to inhibit histamine release <strong>and</strong> interfere with<br />
arachidonic acid metabolism. The nasal spray was self-administered by 12 patients with allergic<br />
rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis, <strong>and</strong>/or bronchial obstructive disease. They were instructed to use<br />
1–2 puffs in each nostril at the first sign <strong>of</strong> symptoms, to a maximum <strong>of</strong> six treatments per day. All<br />
patients experienced rapid <strong>and</strong> significant relief <strong>of</strong> nasal symptoms <strong>and</strong> for those with allergic<br />
conjunctivitis, a significant relief <strong>of</strong> subjective eye symptoms was also experienced. Three <strong>of</strong> six<br />
patients with bronchial obstructive disease experienced rapid <strong>and</strong> clinically significant bronchial<br />
relief (Remberg et al., 2004).<br />
11.17 SNORING<br />
A blend <strong>of</strong> 15 essential oils was developed into a commercial product called “Helps stop snoring”<br />
<strong>and</strong> 140 adult snorers were recruited into a r<strong>and</strong>omized trial using the product as a spray or gargle.<br />
Visual analogue scales were completed by the snorers’ partners relating to sleep disturbance each<br />
night. The treatment lasted for 14 days <strong>and</strong> results were compared to a pretrial period <strong>of</strong> the same<br />
length. The partners <strong>of</strong> 82% <strong>of</strong> the patients using the spray <strong>and</strong> 71% <strong>of</strong> patients using the gargle<br />
reported a reduction in snoring. This was compared to 44% <strong>of</strong> placebo users. The mode <strong>of</strong> action<br />
was postulated as being antispasmodic to the s<strong>of</strong>t palate <strong>and</strong> pharynx (Pritchard, 2004).<br />
11.18 SWALLOWING DYSFUNCTION<br />
A delayed triggering <strong>of</strong> the swallowing reflex, mainly in elderly people, predisposes to aspiration<br />
pneumonia. To improve dysphagia, two different approaches using essential oils have been tried<br />
with success.
Phytotherapeutic Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 343<br />
As black pepper is a strong appetite stimulant, it was postulated that nasal inhalation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
essential oil may stimulate cerebral blood flow in the insular cortex, the dysfunction <strong>of</strong> which has<br />
been reported to play a role in dysphagia. A r<strong>and</strong>omized, controlled study <strong>of</strong> 105 elderly patients<br />
found that the inhalation <strong>of</strong> black pepper oil for 1 min significantly shortened the delayed swallowing<br />
time <strong>and</strong> increased the number <strong>of</strong> swallowing movements. Emission computed tomography<br />
demonstrated activation <strong>of</strong> the anterior cingulate cortex by the treatment. The inhalation <strong>of</strong> lavender<br />
essential oil or water had no effects (Ebihara et al., 2006a).<br />
A second study used the established stimulating effects <strong>of</strong> menthol on cold receptors, since<br />
cold stimulation was known to restore sensitivity to trigger the swallowing reflex in dysphagic patients.<br />
Menthol was introduced into the pharynx <strong>of</strong> patients with mild to moderate dysphagia via a nasal<br />
catheter. The latent time <strong>of</strong> swallowing reflex was reduced significantly by menthol in a concentrationdependent<br />
manner; 10 -2 menthol reduced the time to 9.4 s as compared to 13.8 s for distilled water.<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> a menthol lozenge before meals was thought appropriate (Ebihara et al., 2006b).<br />
11.19 CONCLUSION<br />
It is apparent from the diverse range <strong>of</strong> conditions that have benefitted from the administration <strong>of</strong><br />
essential oils that their therapeutic potential is vast <strong>and</strong> yet underdeveloped. Moreover, since they<br />
are not composed <strong>of</strong> a single “magic bullet” with one target, they <strong>of</strong>ten have multiple effects that<br />
have additive or synergistic properties within a treatment regime.<br />
A great many research papers investigating the bioactivity <strong>of</strong> essential oils conclude that the<br />
results are very encouraging <strong>and</strong> that clinical trials are the next step. For the majority, this step is<br />
never taken. The expense is one limiting factor <strong>and</strong> it is not surprising that clinical trials are mostly<br />
conducted once the essential oils have been formulated into a commercial product that has financial<br />
backing. It is evident that many <strong>of</strong> the claims made for essential oils in therapeutic applications have<br />
not been substantiated <strong>and</strong> an evidence base is clearly lacking. However, there is similarly a lack <strong>of</strong><br />
research to demonstrate that essential oils are not effective interventions.<br />
With the continuing search for new medicaments from natural sources, especially in the realm<br />
<strong>of</strong> antimicrobial therapy, it is hoped that future research into the efficacy <strong>of</strong> essential oils will be<br />
both stimulated <strong>and</strong> funded.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Abdollahi, M., A. Salehnia, S.H. Mortazavi, et al., 2003. Antioxidant, antidiabetic, antihyperlipidaemic, reproduction<br />
stimulatory properties <strong>and</strong> safety <strong>of</strong> essential oil <strong>of</strong> Satureja khuzestanica in rat in vivo: A toxicopharmacological<br />
study. Med. Sci. Mon., 9: BR331–BR335.<br />
Alex<strong>and</strong>rovich, I., O. Rakovitskaya, E. Kolmo, E. Sidorova, <strong>and</strong> S. Shushunov, 2003. The effect <strong>of</strong> fennel<br />
(Foeniculum vulgare) seed oil emulsion in infantile colic: A r<strong>and</strong>omised, placebo-controlled study.<br />
Altern. Ther., 9: 58–61.<br />
Al-Mosawi, A.J., 2005. A possible role <strong>of</strong> essential oil terpenes in the management <strong>of</strong> childhood urolithiasis.<br />
Therapy, 2: 243–247.<br />
Amanlou, M., N. Babaee, M. Saheb-Jamee, et al., 2007. Efficacy <strong>of</strong> Satureja khuzistanica extract <strong>and</strong> essential<br />
oil preparations in the management <strong>of</strong> recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Daru., 15: 231–234.<br />
Amanlou, M., F. Dadkhah, A. Salehnia, H. Farsam, <strong>and</strong> A.R. Dehpour, 2005. An anti-inflammatory <strong>and</strong> antinociceptive<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> hydroalcoholic extract <strong>of</strong> Satureja khuzistanica Jamzad extract. J. Pharm.<br />
Pharmacol. Sci., 8: 102–106.<br />
Amanlou, M., M.R. Fazeli, A. Arvin, H.G. Amin, <strong>and</strong> H. Farsam, 2004. Antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> crude methanolic<br />
extract <strong>of</strong> Satureja khuzistanica. Fitoterapia., 75: 768–770.<br />
Approved Herbs, 1998. In: E. Blumenthal, W.R. Busse, A. Goldberg, J. Gruenwald, T. Hall, C.W. Riggins, <strong>and</strong><br />
R.S. Rister, eds, The Complete German Commission E Monographs, Therapeutic Guide to Herbal<br />
Medicines, Boston, USA: American Botanical Council.<br />
Arweiler, N.B., N. Donos, L. Netuschil, E. Reich, <strong>and</strong> A. Sculean, 2000. Clinical <strong>and</strong> antibacterial effect <strong>of</strong> tea<br />
tree oil—a pilot study. Clin. Oral Invest., 4: 70–73.<br />
Asao, T., H. Kuwano, M. Ide, et al., 2003. Spasmolytic effect <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil in barium during doublecontrast<br />
barium enema compared with buscopan. Clin. Radiol., 58: 301–305.
344 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Bailey, H.H., S. Attia, R. R. Love, et al., 2008. Phase II trial <strong>of</strong> daily oral perillyl alcohol (NSC 641066) in<br />
treatment-refractory metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 62: 149–157.<br />
Bailey, H.H., D. Levy, L.S. Harris, et al., 2002. A phase II trial <strong>of</strong> daily perillyl alcohol in patients with advanced<br />
ovarian cancer: Eastern cooperative oncology group study E2E96. Gynecol. Oncol., 85: 464–468.<br />
Bak, C.W., S.J. Yoon, <strong>and</strong> H. Chung, 2007. Effects <strong>of</strong> an a-blocker <strong>and</strong> terpene mixture for pain control <strong>and</strong><br />
spontaneous expulsion <strong>of</strong> ureter stone. Korean J. Urol., 48: 517–521.<br />
Behrbohm, H., O. Kaschke, <strong>and</strong> K. Sydnow, 1995. Der Einfluß des pflanzlichen Sekretolytikums Gelomyrtol ®<br />
forte auf die mukozililiäre Clearance der Kieferhöhle. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol., 74: 733–737.<br />
Behrendt, H-J., T. Germann, C. Gillen, H. Hatt, <strong>and</strong> R. Jostock, 2004. Characterisation <strong>of</strong> the mouse coldmenthol<br />
receptor TRPM8 <strong>and</strong> vanilloid receptor type-1 VR1 using a fluorometric imaging plate reader<br />
(FLIPR) assay. Br. J. Pharmacol., 141: 737–745.<br />
Bell, G.D., J.P. Bradshaw, A. Burgess, et al., 1980. Elevation <strong>of</strong> serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol by<br />
Rowachol, a proprietary mixture <strong>of</strong> six pure monoterpenes. Atherosclerosis, 36: 47–54.<br />
Berger, H., E. Jarosch, <strong>and</strong> H. Madreiter, 1978a. Effect <strong>of</strong> vaporub <strong>and</strong> petroleum on frequency <strong>and</strong> amplitude<br />
<strong>of</strong> breathing in children with acute bronchitis. J. Int. Med. Res., 6: 483–486.<br />
Berger, H., E. Jarosch, <strong>and</strong> H. Madreiter, 1978b. Effect <strong>of</strong> vaporub on the restlessness <strong>of</strong> children with acute<br />
bronchitis. J. Int. Med. Res., 6: 491–493.<br />
Botelho, M.A., J.G. Bezerra Filho, L.L. Correa, et al., 2007. Effect <strong>of</strong> a novel essential oil mouthrinse without<br />
alcohol on gingivitis: A double-blinded r<strong>and</strong>omised controlled trial. J. Appl. Oral Sci., 15: 175–180.<br />
Bourne, K.Z., N. Bourne, S.F. Reising, <strong>and</strong> L.R. Stanberry, 1999. Plant products as topical microbicide c<strong>and</strong>idates:<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> in vitro <strong>and</strong> in vivo activity against Herpes simplex virus type 2. Antiviral Res., 42:<br />
219–226.<br />
Boyd, E.M. <strong>and</strong> E.P. Sheppard, 1969. A bronchomucotropic action in rabbits from inhaled menthol <strong>and</strong> thymol.<br />
Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn., 182: 206–213.<br />
Boyd, E.M. <strong>and</strong> E.P. Sheppard, 1971. An autumn-enhanced mucotropic action <strong>of</strong> inhaled terpenes <strong>and</strong> related<br />
volatile agents. Pharmacology, 6: 65–80.<br />
Burgess, K.R. <strong>and</strong> W.A. Whitelaw, 1988. Effects <strong>of</strong> nasal cold receptors on patterns <strong>of</strong> breathing. J. Appl.<br />
Physiol., 64: 371–376.<br />
Burke, B.E., J.-E. Baillie, <strong>and</strong> R.D. Olson, 2004. <strong>Essential</strong> oil <strong>of</strong> Australian lemon myrtle (Backhousia citriodora)<br />
in the treatment <strong>of</strong> molluscum contagiosum in children. Biomed. Pharmacother., 58: 245–247.<br />
Burrow, A., R. Eccles, <strong>and</strong> A.S. Jones, 1983. The effects <strong>of</strong> camphor, eucalyptus <strong>and</strong> menthol vapours on nasal<br />
resistance to airflow <strong>and</strong> nasal sensation. Acta Otolaryngol., 96: 157–161.<br />
Caelli, M., J. Porteous, C.F. Carson, R. Heller, <strong>and</strong> T.V. Riley, 2000. Tea tree oils an alternative topical decolonization<br />
agent for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Hospital Infect., 46: 236–237.<br />
Capanni, M., E. Surrenti, M.R. Biagini, S. Milani, C. Surrenh, <strong>and</strong> A. Galli, 2005. Efficacy <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil in<br />
the treatment <strong>of</strong> irritable bowel syndrome: A r<strong>and</strong>omized, controlled trial. Gazzetta Med. Ital. Arch. Sci.<br />
Med., 164: 119–126.<br />
Cappello, G., M. Spezzaferro, L. Grossi, L. Manzoli, <strong>and</strong> L. Marzio, 2007. Peppermint oil (Mintol ® ) in the<br />
treatment <strong>of</strong> irritable bowel syndrome: A prospective double blind placebo-controlled r<strong>and</strong>omized trial.<br />
Dig. Liver Dis., 39: 530–536.<br />
Carson, C.F., L. Ashton, L. Dry, D.W. Smith, <strong>and</strong> T.V. Riley, 2001. Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil gel (6%)<br />
for the treatment <strong>of</strong> recurrent herpes labialis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 48: 445–446.<br />
Carson, C.F., B.J. Mee, <strong>and</strong> T.V. Rilet, 2002. Mechanism <strong>of</strong> action <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca alternifoila (tea tree) oil on<br />
Staphylococcus aureus determined by time-kill, lysis, leakage <strong>and</strong> salt tolerance assays <strong>and</strong> electron<br />
microscopy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 48: 1914–1920.<br />
Carson, C.F., B.D. Cookson, H.D. Farrelly, <strong>and</strong> T.V. Riley, 1995. Susceptibility <strong>of</strong> methicillin-resistant<br />
Staphylococcus aureus to the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca alternifolia. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 35:<br />
421–424.<br />
Charles, C.H., J.W. Vincent, L. Borycheski, et al., 2000. Effect <strong>of</strong> an essential oil-containing dentifrice on dental<br />
plaque microbial composition. Am. J. Dent., 13: 26C–30C.<br />
Chiyotani, A., J. Tamaoki, <strong>and</strong> N. Sakai, 1994b. Effect <strong>of</strong> menthol on peak expiratory flow in patients with<br />
bronchial asthma. Jap. J. Chest Dis., 53: 949–953.<br />
Chiyotani, A., J. Tamaoki, S. Takeuchi, M. Kondo, K. Isono, <strong>and</strong> K. Konno, 1994a. Stimulation by menthol <strong>of</strong><br />
Cl secretion via a Ca 2+ -dependent mechanism in canine airway epithelium. Br. J. Pharmacol., 112:<br />
571–575.<br />
Clarke, R.W., A.S. Jones, P. Charters, <strong>and</strong> I. Sherman, 1992. The role <strong>of</strong> mucosal receptors in the nasal sensation<br />
<strong>of</strong> airflow. Clin. Otolaryngol, 17: 383–387.
Phytotherapeutic Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 345<br />
Clegg, R.J., B. Middleton, G.D. Bell, <strong>and</strong> D.A. White, 1980. Inhibition <strong>of</strong> hepatic cholesterol synthesis <strong>and</strong><br />
S-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase by mono <strong>and</strong> bicyclic monoterpenes administered in vivo.<br />
Biochem. Pharmacol., 29: 2125–2127.<br />
Coelho, J., B.E. Kohut, S. Mankodi, R. Parikh, <strong>and</strong> M.-M. Wu, 2000. <strong>Essential</strong> oils in an antiplaque <strong>and</strong> antigingivitis<br />
dentifrice: A 6-month study. Am. J. Dent., 13: 5C–10C.<br />
Coelho-de-Souza., L.N., J.H. Leal-Cardoso, F.J. de Abreu Matos, S. Lahlou, <strong>and</strong> P.J.C. Magalhães, 2005.<br />
Relaxant effects <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus tereticornis <strong>and</strong> its main constituent 1,8-cineole on<br />
guinea-pig tracheal smooth muscle. Planta Med., 71: 1173–1175.<br />
Cohen, B.M. <strong>and</strong> W.E. Dressler, 1982. Acute aromatics inhalation modifies the airways. Effects <strong>of</strong> the common<br />
cold. Respiration., 43: 285–293.<br />
Cooke, C.J., M.N. Nanjee, P. Dewey, J.A. Cooper, G.J. Miller, <strong>and</strong> N.E. Miller, 1998. Plant monoterpenes do<br />
not raise plasma high-density-lipoprotein concentrations in humans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 68: 1042–1045.<br />
Coskun, S., O.K Girisgin, M. Kürkcüoglu, et al., 2008. Acaricidal efficacy <strong>of</strong> Origanum onites L. essential oil<br />
against Rhipicephalus turanicus (Ixodidae). Parasitology Res., 103: 259–261.<br />
Das, P.K., R.S. Rathor, <strong>and</strong> A.K. San Yal, 1970. Effect on ciliary movements <strong>of</strong> some agents which come into<br />
contact with the respiratory tract. Ind. J. Physiol. Pharmacol., 14: 297–303.<br />
de Pradier, E., 2006. A trial <strong>of</strong> a mixture <strong>of</strong> three essential oils in the treatment <strong>of</strong> postoperative nausea <strong>and</strong><br />
vomiting. Int. J. Aromather., 16: 15–20.<br />
Dew, M.J., B.K. Evans, J. Rhodes, 1984. Peppermint oil for the irritable bowel syndrome: A multicentre trial.<br />
Br. J. Clin. Pract., 38: 394, 398.<br />
Duncan, R.E., A. El-Sohemy, M.C. Archer, et al., 2005. Dietary factors <strong>and</strong> the regulation <strong>of</strong> 3-hydroxy-3-<br />
methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase: Implications for breast cancer development. Mol. Nutr. Food Res.,<br />
49: 93–100.<br />
Doran, J. <strong>and</strong> G.D. Bell, 1979. Gallstone dissolution in man using an essential oil preparation. Br. Med. J., 1: 24.<br />
Dorow, P., 1989. Welchen Einfluß hat Cineol auf die mukoziliare Clearance? Therapiewoche, 39: 2652–2654.<br />
Dorow, P., Th. Weiss, R. Felix, <strong>and</strong> H. Schmutzler, 1987. Einfluß eines Sekretolytikums und einer Kombination<br />
von Pinen, Limonen und Cineol auf die mukoziliäre Clearance bei Patienten mit chronisch obstrucktiver<br />
Atemwegserkrankung. Arzneim.-Forsch., 37: 1378–1381.<br />
Dos Santos, F.J.B., J.A.D. Lopes, A.M.G.L. Cito, E.H. De Oliveira, S.G. De Lima, <strong>and</strong> F.D.A.M. Reis, 2004.<br />
Composition <strong>and</strong> biological activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils from Lippia origanoides H.B.K. J. Essent. Oil Res.,<br />
16:504–506.<br />
Dryden, M.S., S. Dailly, <strong>and</strong> M. Crouch, 2004. A r<strong>and</strong>omised, controlled trial <strong>of</strong> tea tree topical preparations<br />
versus a st<strong>and</strong>ard topical regimen for the clearance <strong>of</strong> MRSA colonization. J. Hospital Infect., 56:<br />
283–286.<br />
Ebihara, T., S. Ebihara, M. Maruyama, et al., 2006a. A r<strong>and</strong>omised trial <strong>of</strong> olfactory stimulation using black<br />
pepper oil in older people with swallowing dysfunction. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc., 54: 1401–1406.<br />
Ebihara, T., S. Ebihara, A. Wat<strong>and</strong>o, et al., 2006b. Effects <strong>of</strong> menthol on the triggering <strong>of</strong> the swallowing reflex<br />
in elderly patients with dysphagia. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 62:3 69–371.<br />
Eccles, R., 2000. Role <strong>of</strong> cold receptors <strong>and</strong> menthol in thirst, the drive to breathe <strong>and</strong> arousal. Appetite., 34:<br />
29–35.<br />
Eccles, R., D.H. Griffiths, C.G. Newton, <strong>and</strong> N.S. Tolley, 1988. The effects <strong>of</strong> menthol isomers on nasal sensation<br />
<strong>of</strong> airflow. Clin. Otolaryngol., 13: 25–29.<br />
Eccles, R., M.S. Jawad, <strong>and</strong> S. Morris, 1990. The effects <strong>of</strong> oral administration <strong>of</strong> (-)-menthol on nasal resistance<br />
to airflow <strong>and</strong> nasal sensation <strong>of</strong> airflow in subjects suffering from nasal congestion associated with<br />
the common cold. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 42: 652–654.<br />
El-Zemity, S., H. Rezk, S. Farok, <strong>and</strong> A. Zaitoon, 2006. Acaricidal activities <strong>of</strong> some essential oils <strong>and</strong><br />
their monoterpenoidal constituents against house dust mite, dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Acari:<br />
Pyroglyphidae). J. Zhejiang Uni. Sci B., 7: 957–962.<br />
Ellis, W.R. <strong>and</strong> G.D. Bell, 1981. Treatment <strong>of</strong> biliary duct stones with a terpene preparation. Br. Med. J., 282:<br />
611.<br />
Ellis, W.R., G.D. Bell, B. Middleton, <strong>and</strong> D.A. White, 1981. An adjunct to bile acid therapy for gallstone dissolution—combination<br />
<strong>of</strong> low dose chenodeoxycholic acid with a terpene preparation. Br. Med. J.,<br />
1: 611–612.<br />
Elson, C.E. <strong>and</strong> S.G. Yu, 1994. The chemoprevention <strong>of</strong> cancer by mevalonate-derived constituents <strong>of</strong> fruits <strong>and</strong><br />
vegetables. J. Nutr., 124: 607–614.<br />
Engelstein, D., E. Kahan, <strong>and</strong> C. Servadio, 1992. Rowatinex for the treatment <strong>of</strong> ureterolithiasis. J. d’Urologie,<br />
98: 98–100.
346 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Enshaieh, S., A. Jooya, A.H. Siadat, <strong>and</strong> F. Iraji, 2007. The efficacy <strong>of</strong> 5% topical tea tree oil gel in mild to<br />
moderate acne vulgaris: A r<strong>and</strong>omised, double-blind-placebo-controlled study. Indian J. Dermatol.<br />
Venereol. Leprol., 73: 22–25.<br />
Federspil, P., R. Wulkow, <strong>and</strong> Th. Zimmermann, 1997. Wirkung von Myrtol st<strong>and</strong>ardisiert bei der Therapie der<br />
akuten Sinusitis—Ergebnisse einer doppelblinden, r<strong>and</strong>omisierten Multicenterstudie gegen Plazebo.<br />
Laryngo-Rhino-Otol., 76: 23–27.<br />
Fichi, G., G. Flamini, L.J.. Zaralli, <strong>and</strong> S. Perrucci, 2007. Efficacy <strong>of</strong> an essential oil <strong>of</strong> Cinnamomum zeylanicum<br />
against Psoroptes cuniculi. Phytomedicine, 14: 227–231.<br />
Fine, D.H., K. Markowitz, D. Furgang, et al., 2007. Effect <strong>of</strong> rinsing with an essential oil-containing mouthrinse<br />
on subgingival periodontopathogens. J. Periodontol., 78: 1935–1942.<br />
Freidman, L.S., 1998. Helicobacter pylori <strong>and</strong> nonulcer dyspepsia. N. Engl. J. Med., 339: 1928–1930.<br />
Geiger, J.L., 2005. The essential oil <strong>of</strong> ginger, Zingiber <strong>of</strong>ficinale, <strong>and</strong> anaesthesia. Int. J. Aromather., 15: 7–14.<br />
Gilligan, N.P., 2005. The palliation <strong>of</strong> nausea in hospice <strong>and</strong> palliative care patients with essential oils <strong>of</strong><br />
Pimpinella anisum (aniseed), Foeniculum vulgare var. dulce (sweet fennel), Anthemis nobilis (Roman<br />
chamomile) <strong>and</strong> Mentha ¥ piperita (peppermint). Int. J. Aromather., 15: 163–167.<br />
Giraud-Robert, A.M., 2005. The role <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy in the treatment <strong>of</strong> viral hepatitis Int. J. Aromather., 15:<br />
183–192.<br />
Göbel, H., M. Dworschak, A. Ardabili, H. Stolze, <strong>and</strong> D. Soyka, 1995b. Effect <strong>of</strong> volatile oils on the flow <strong>of</strong><br />
skin-capillaries <strong>of</strong> the head in healthy people <strong>and</strong> migraine patients. Cephalalgia., 15: 93.<br />
Göbel, H., G. Schmidt, M. Dworschak, H. Stolze, <strong>and</strong> D. Heuss, 1995a. <strong>Essential</strong> plant oils <strong>and</strong> headache<br />
mechanisms. Phytomedicine, 2(2): 93–102.<br />
Goerg, K.J. <strong>and</strong> T. Spilker, 1996. Simultane sonographische Messung der Magen-und Gallenblasenentleerung<br />
mit gleichzeitiger Bestimmung der orozökalen Transitzeit mittels H 2 -Atemtest. In: Phytopharmaka II, D.<br />
Low <strong>and</strong> N. Rietbrock, eds. Forschung und klinische Anwendung. Damstadt: Steinkopff.<br />
Goerg, K.J. <strong>and</strong> Th. Spilker, 2003. Effect <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil <strong>and</strong> caraway oil on gastrointestinal motility in<br />
healthy volunteers: A pharmacodynamic study using simultaneous determination <strong>of</strong> gastric <strong>and</strong> gallbladder<br />
emptying <strong>and</strong> orocaecal transit time. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther., 17: 445–451.<br />
Greenway, F.L., B.M. Frome, T.M. Engels, <strong>and</strong> A. McLellan, 2003. Temporary relief <strong>of</strong> postherpetic neuralgia<br />
pain with topical geranium oil [letter]. Am. J. Med., 115: 586–587.<br />
Grigoleit, H.-G. <strong>and</strong> P. Grigoleit, 2005. Peppermint oil in irritable bowel syndrome. Phytomed., 12: 601–606.<br />
Grimm, H., 1987. Antiobstruktive Wirksamkeit von Cineol bei Atemwegserkrankungen. Th. Erapiewoche, 37:<br />
4306–4311.<br />
Habich, G. <strong>and</strong> R. Repges, 1994. Chronisch obstruktive Atemwegserkrankungen. Cineol als Medikation sinnvoll<br />
und bewährt! Therapiewoche, 44: 356–365.<br />
Han, S.-H., M.-H. Hur, J. Buckle, J. Choi, <strong>and</strong> M.S. Lee, 2006. Effect <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy on symptoms <strong>of</strong> dysmenorrhea<br />
in college students: A r<strong>and</strong>omised placebo-controlled clinical trial. J. Altern. Comp. Med., 12:<br />
535–541.<br />
Harries, N., K.C. James, <strong>and</strong> W.K. Pugh, 1978. Antifoaming <strong>and</strong> carminative actions <strong>of</strong> volatile oils. J. Clin.<br />
Pharmacy., 2: 171–177.<br />
Hasani, A., P. Demetri, N. Toms, P. Dilworth, J.E. Agnew, 2003. Effect <strong>of</strong> aromatics on lung mucociliary clearance<br />
in patients with chronic airways obstruction. J. Altern. Comp. Med., 9: 243–249.<br />
Hayes A.J. <strong>and</strong> B. Markovic, 2002. Toxicity <strong>of</strong> Australian essential oil Backhousia citriodora (Lemon myrtle).<br />
Part 1. Antimicrobial activity <strong>and</strong> in vitro cytotoxicity. Food Chem. Toxicol., 40: 535–543.<br />
Holtmann, G., S. Haag, B. Adam, P. Funk, V. Wiel<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> C.-J. Heydenreich, 2003. Effects <strong>of</strong> a fixed combination<br />
<strong>of</strong> peppermint oil <strong>and</strong> caraway oil on symptoms <strong>and</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> life in patients suffering from functional<br />
dyspepsia. Phytomedicine, 10: 56–57.<br />
Holtmann, G., J. Gschossmann, L. Buenger, V. Wiel<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> C-J. Heydenreich, 2001. Effects <strong>of</strong> a fixed peppermint<br />
oil/caraway oil combination (PCC) on symptoms <strong>and</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> life in functional dyspepsia. A multicentre,<br />
placebo-controlled, double-blind, r<strong>and</strong>omised trial. Gastroenterology, 120 (Suppl. 1): A-237.<br />
Holtmann, G., J. Gschossmann, L. Buenger, V. Wiel<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> C-J. Heydenreich, 2002. Effects <strong>of</strong> a fixed peppermint<br />
oil/caraway oil combination (FPCO) on symptoms <strong>of</strong> functional dyspepsia accentuated by pain<br />
or discomfort. Gastroenterology, 122 (Suppl. 1): A-471.<br />
Hordinsky B.Z. <strong>and</strong> W. Hordinsky, 1979. Rowachol—its use in hyperlipidemia. Arch. Arzneither., 1: 45–51.<br />
Hur, M-H., J. Park, W. Maddock-Jennings, D.O. Kim, <strong>and</strong> M.S. Lee, 2007. Reduction <strong>of</strong> mouth malodour <strong>and</strong><br />
volatile sulphur compounds in intensive care patients using an essential oil mouthwash. Phytother. Res.,<br />
21: 641–643.<br />
Igimi, H., T. Histasugo, <strong>and</strong> M. Nishimura, 1976. The use <strong>of</strong> d-limonene preparation as a dissolving agent <strong>of</strong><br />
gallstones. Am. J. Dig. Dis., 21: 926–939.
Phytotherapeutic Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 347<br />
Igimi, H., R. Tamura, K. Toraishi, et al., 1991. Medical dissolution <strong>of</strong> gallstones. Clinical experience <strong>of</strong> d-limonene<br />
as a simple, safe <strong>and</strong> effective solvent. Dig. Dis. Sci., 36: 329–332.<br />
Imai, H., K. Osawa, H. Yasuda, H. Hamashima, T. Arai, <strong>and</strong> M. Sasatsu, 2001. Inhibition by the essential oils<br />
<strong>of</strong> peppermint <strong>and</strong> spearmint <strong>of</strong> the growth <strong>of</strong> pathogenic bacteria. Microbios, 106: 31–39.<br />
Jahromi, B.N., A. Tartifizadeh, <strong>and</strong> S. Khabnadideh, 2003. Comparison <strong>of</strong> fennel <strong>and</strong> mefenamic acid for the<br />
treatment <strong>of</strong> primary dysmenorrhea. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet., 80: 153–157.<br />
J<strong>and</strong>ourek, A., J.K. Viashampayan, <strong>and</strong> J.A. Vazquez, 1998. Efficacy <strong>of</strong> melaleuca oral solution for the treatment<br />
<strong>of</strong> fluconazole refractory oral c<strong>and</strong>idiasis in AIDS patients. Aids, 12: 1033–1037.<br />
Jordt, S-E., D.D. McKemmy, <strong>and</strong> D. Julius, 2003. Lessons from peppers <strong>and</strong> peppermint: The molecular lopgic<br />
<strong>of</strong> thermosensation. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 13: 73–77.<br />
Juergens, U.R., U. Dethlefsen, G. Steinkamp, A. Gillissen, R. Repges, <strong>and</strong> H. Vetter, 2003. Anti-inflammatory<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineol (eucalyptol) in bronchial asthma: A double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Resp.<br />
Med., 97: 250–256.<br />
Juergens, U.R., T. Engelen, K. Racké, M. Stöber, A. S. Gillissen, <strong>and</strong> H. Vetter, 2004. Inhibitory activity <strong>of</strong> 1,8-<br />
cineole (eucalyptol) on cytokine production in cultured human lymphocytes <strong>and</strong> monocytes. Pulmon.<br />
Pharmacol. Therapeut., 17: 281–287.<br />
Juergens, U.R., M. Stöber, L. Schmidt-Schilling, T. Kleuver, <strong>and</strong> H. Vetter, 1998c. Antiinflammatory effects <strong>of</strong><br />
eucalyptol (1,8-cineole) in bronchial asthma: Inhibition <strong>of</strong> arachidonic acid metabolism in human blood<br />
monocytes ex vivo. Eur. J Med. Res., 3: 407–412.<br />
Juergens, U.R., M. Stöber, <strong>and</strong> H. Vetter, 1998a. Steroidartige Hemmung des monozytären Arachidonsäureme<br />
tabolismus und der IL-1b-Produktion durch 1,8-Cineol. Atemwegs-Lungenkrank., 24(1): 3–11.<br />
Juergens, U.R., M. Stöber, <strong>and</strong> H. Vetter, 1998b. Inhibition <strong>of</strong> cytokine production <strong>and</strong> arachidonic acid metabolism<br />
by eucalyptol (1,8-cineole) in human blood monocytes in vitro. Eur. J. Med. Res., 3: 508–510.<br />
Kamin, W. <strong>and</strong> M. Kieser, 2007. Pinimenthol ® ointment in patients suffering from upper respiratory tract infections—a<br />
post-marketing observational study. Phytomedicine, 14: 787–791.<br />
Kaspar, P., R. Repges, U. Dethlefsen, <strong>and</strong> W. Petro, 1994. Sekretolytika im Vergleich. Änderung der<br />
Ziliarfrequenz und Lungenfunktion nach Therapie mit Cineol und Ambroxol. Atemw.-Lungenkrank., 20:<br />
605–614.<br />
Kehrl, W., U. Sonnemann, <strong>and</strong> U. Dethlefson, 2004. Therapy for acute nonpurulent rhinosinusitis with cineole:<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> a double-blind, r<strong>and</strong>omised, placebo-controlled trial. Laryngoscope, 114: 738–742.<br />
Kenia, P., T. Houghton, <strong>and</strong> C. Beardsmore, 2008. Does inhaling menthol affect nasal patency or cough?<br />
Pediatr. Pulmonol., 43: 532–537.<br />
Khorshidi, N., S.N. Ostad, M. Mopsaddegh, <strong>and</strong> M. Soodi, 2003. Clinical effects <strong>of</strong> fennel essential oil on<br />
primary dysmenorrhea. Iranian J. Pharm. Res., 2: 89–93.<br />
Khosravi, A.R., A.R. Eslami, H. Shokri, <strong>and</strong> M. Kashanian, 2008. Zataria multiflora cream for the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
acute vaginal c<strong>and</strong>idiasis. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet., 101: 201–202.<br />
Kim, H.-K., Y.-K. Yun, <strong>and</strong> Y.-J. Ahn, 2008. Fumigant toxicity <strong>of</strong> cassia bark <strong>and</strong> cassia <strong>and</strong> cinnamon oil compounds<br />
to Dermatophagoides farinae <strong>and</strong> Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Acari: Pyroglyphidae).<br />
Exp. Appl. Acarol., 44: 1–9.<br />
Kim, J.T., C.J. Ren, G.A. Fielding, et al., 2007. Treatment with lavender aromatherapy in the post-anaesthesia<br />
care unit reduces opioid requirements <strong>of</strong> morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic adjustable<br />
gastric b<strong>and</strong>ing. Obes. Surg., 17: 920–925.<br />
Kim, J.T., M. Wadja, G. Cuff, et al., 2006. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy in treating postoperative pain: Pilot<br />
study. Pain Practice, 6: 273–277.<br />
Kirov, M., T. Burkova, V. Kapurdov, <strong>and</strong> M. Spasovski, 1988a. Rose oil. Lipotropic effect in modelled fatty<br />
dystrophy <strong>of</strong> the liver. Medico Biologic Info., 3: 18–22.<br />
Kirov, M., P. Koev, I. Popiliev, I. Apostolov, <strong>and</strong> V. Marinova, 1988b. Girositol. Clinical trial in primary hyperlipoproteinemia.<br />
Medico Biologic Info., 3: 30–34.<br />
Kline, R.M., J.J. Kline, J. Di Palma, <strong>and</strong> G.J. Barbaro, 2001. Enteric-coated, pH-dependent peppermint oil<br />
capsules for the treatment <strong>of</strong> irritable bowel syndrome in children. J. Pediatr., 138: 125–128.<br />
Konstantinova, L., M. Kirov, M. Petrova, M. Ortova, <strong>and</strong> V. Marinova, 1988. Girosital. Continuous administration<br />
in hyperlipoproteinemia <strong>and</strong> chronic alcoholic lesions. Medico Biologic Info., 3: 35–38.<br />
Kotan, R., S. Kordali, <strong>and</strong> A. Cakir, 2007. Screening <strong>of</strong> antibacterial activities <strong>of</strong> twenty-one oxygenated<br />
monoterpenes. Zeit. Naturforsch. C, 62: 507–513.<br />
Lamster, I.B., M.C. Alfano, M.C. Seiger, <strong>and</strong> J.M. Gordon, 1983. The effect <strong>of</strong> Listerine antiseptic on reduction<br />
<strong>of</strong> existing plaque <strong>and</strong> gingivitis. Clin. Prev. Dent., 5: 12–16.<br />
Lamy, J., 1967. Essais cliniques de dérivés terpeniques en therapeutique hépato-biliare. L’Information<br />
Therapeutique., 5: 39–45.
348 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Laude, E.A., A.H. Morice, <strong>and</strong> T.J. Grattan, 1994. The antitussive effects <strong>of</strong> menthol, camphor <strong>and</strong> cineole in<br />
conscious guinea pigs. Pulmon. Pharmacol., 7: 179–184.<br />
Lawson, M.J., R.E. Knight, T.G. Walker, <strong>and</strong> I.C. Roberts-Thomson, 1988. Failure <strong>of</strong> enteric-coated peppermint<br />
oil in the irritable bowel syndrome: A r<strong>and</strong>omised, double-blind crossover study. J. Gastroenterol.<br />
Hepatol., 3: 235–238.<br />
Le Faou, M., T. Beghe, E. Bourguignon, et al., 2005. The effects <strong>of</strong> the application <strong>of</strong> Dermasport ® plus Solution<br />
Cryo ® in physiotherapy. Int. J. Aromather., 15: 123–128.<br />
Lee, C.B., U-S. Ha, S.J. Lee, S.W. Kim, <strong>and</strong> Y.-H. Cho, 2006. Preliminary experience with a terpene mixture<br />
versus ibupr<strong>of</strong>en for treatment <strong>of</strong> category III chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. World J.<br />
Urol., 24: 55–60.<br />
Linsenmann, P. <strong>and</strong> M. Swoboda, 1986. Therapeutic efficacy <strong>of</strong> volatile oils in chronic obstructive bronchitis.<br />
Therapiewoche., 36: 1162–1166.<br />
Liu, J.-H., G.-H. Chen, H.-Z. Yeh, C.-K. Huang, <strong>and</strong> S.-K. Poon, 1997. Enteric-coated peppermint-oil capsules<br />
in the treatment <strong>of</strong> irritable bowel syndrome: A prospective, r<strong>and</strong>omised trial. J. Gastroenterol., 32:<br />
765–768.<br />
Logan, A.C. <strong>and</strong> T.M. Beaulne, 2002. The treatment <strong>of</strong> small intestinal bacterial overgrowth with enteric-coated<br />
peppermint oil: A case report. Altern. Med. Rev., 7: 410–417.<br />
Madisch, A., C.-J. Heydenreich, V. Wiel<strong>and</strong>, R. Hufnagel, <strong>and</strong> J. Hotz, 1999. Treatment <strong>of</strong> functional dyspepsia<br />
with a fixed peppermint oil <strong>and</strong> caraway oil combination preparation as compared to cisapride. Arzneim.-<br />
Forsch., 49: 925–932.<br />
Madisch, A., C.-J. Heydenreich, V. Wiel<strong>and</strong>, R. Hufnagel, <strong>and</strong> J. Hotz, 2000. Equivalence <strong>of</strong> a fixed herbal<br />
combination preparation as compared with cisapride in functional dyspepsia—influence <strong>of</strong> H. pylori<br />
status [Abstract]. Gut, 47 (Suppl. 1): A111.<br />
Magalhães, P.J., S. Lahlou, M.A. Vasconcelos dos Santos, T.L. Pradines, <strong>and</strong> J.H. Leal-Cardoso, 2003.<br />
Myorelaxant effects <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Croton nepetaefolius on the contractile activity <strong>of</strong> the guinea<br />
pig tracheal smooth muscle. Planta Med., 69: 74–77.<br />
Mahlo, D.-H., 1990. Obstruktive Atemwegserkrankungen. Mit Cineol die Lungen-funktionsparameter<br />
verbessern. Therapiewoche, 40: 3157–3162.<br />
Mahmoudabadi, A.Z., M.A. Dabbagh, <strong>and</strong> Z. Fouladi, 2006. In vitro anti-c<strong>and</strong>ida activity <strong>of</strong> Zataria multifl ora<br />
Boiss. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat Med., 4: 351–353.<br />
Mansoori, P., A. Hadjiakhondi, R. Ghavami, <strong>and</strong> A. Shafiee, 2002. Clinical evaluation <strong>of</strong> Zataria multifl ora<br />
essential oil mouthwash in the management <strong>of</strong> recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Daru., 10: 74–77.<br />
March<strong>and</strong>, S. <strong>and</strong> P. Arsenault, 2002. Odors modulate pain perception. A gender-specific effect. Physiol.<br />
Behav., 76: 251–256.<br />
Maruyama, N., H. Hiroko Ishibashi, <strong>and</strong> W. Weimin Hu, et al., 2006. Suppression <strong>of</strong> carrageenan- <strong>and</strong> collagen<br />
II-induced inflammation in mice by geranium oil. Mediat. Infl amm., Article ID 62537, Pages 1–7. DOI<br />
10.1155/MI/2006/62537.<br />
Masako, K., I. Hideyki, O. Shigeyuk, <strong>and</strong> I. Zenro, 2005a. A novel method to control the balance <strong>of</strong> skin micr<strong>of</strong>lora.<br />
Part 1. Attack on bi<strong>of</strong>ilm <strong>of</strong> Staphylococcus aureus without antibiotics. J. Dermatol. Sci., 38: 197–205.<br />
Masako, K., K. Yusuke, I Hideyuki, et al., 2005b. A novel method to control the balance <strong>of</strong> skin micr<strong>of</strong>lora.<br />
Part 2. A study to assess the effect <strong>of</strong> a cream containing farnesol <strong>and</strong> xylitol on atopic dry skin.<br />
J. Dermatol. Sci., 38: 207–213.<br />
Mattys, H., C. de Mey, C. Carls, A. Ryś, A. Geib, <strong>and</strong> T. Wittig, 2000. Efficacy <strong>and</strong> tolerability <strong>of</strong> myrtol st<strong>and</strong>ardised<br />
in acute bronchitis. A multi-centre, r<strong>and</strong>omised, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group<br />
clinical trialversus. cefuroxime <strong>and</strong> ambroxol. Arzneim.-Forsch., 50(8): 700–711.<br />
May, B., P. Funk, <strong>and</strong> B. Schneider, 2003. Peppermint <strong>and</strong> caraway oil in functional dyspepsia—Efficacy unaffected<br />
by H. pylori [letter]. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther., 17: 975–976.<br />
May, B., S. Köhler, <strong>and</strong> B. Schneider, 2000. Efficacy <strong>and</strong> tolerability <strong>of</strong> a fixed combination <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil<br />
<strong>and</strong> caraway oil in patients suffering from functional dyspepsia. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther., 14:<br />
1671–1677.<br />
May, B., H.-D. Kuntz, M. Kieser, <strong>and</strong> S. KÖhler, 1996. Efficacy <strong>of</strong> a fixed peppermint oil/caraway oil combination<br />
in non-ulcer dyspepsia. Arzneim.-Forsch., 46: 1149–1153.<br />
McBride, B. <strong>and</strong> W.A. Whitelaw, 1981. Physiological stimulus to upper airway receptors in humans. J. Appl.<br />
Physiol., 57: 1189–1197.<br />
Meadows, S.M., D. Mulkerin, J. Berlin, et al., 2002. Phase II trial <strong>of</strong> perillyl alcohol in patients with metastatic<br />
colorectal cancer. Int. J. Gastrointest. Cancer, 32: 125–128.<br />
Mechkov, G., M. Kirov, B. Yankov, P. Georgiev, V. Marinova, <strong>and</strong> T. Doncheva, 1988. Girosital. Hypolipidemic<br />
effect in cholelithiasis <strong>and</strong> liver steatosis. Medico Biologic Info., 3: 26–29.
Phytotherapeutic Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 349<br />
Meiller, T.F., A. Silva, S.M. Ferreira, M.A. Jabra-Rizk, J.I. Kelley, <strong>and</strong> L.G. DePaola, 2005. Efficacy <strong>of</strong><br />
Listerine ® antiseptic in reducing viral contamination <strong>of</strong> saliva. J. Clin. Periodontol., 32: 341–46.<br />
Meister, R., T. Wittig, N. Beuscher, <strong>and</strong> C. de Mey, 1999. Efficacy <strong>and</strong> tolerability <strong>of</strong> myrtol st<strong>and</strong>ardized in<br />
long-term treatment <strong>of</strong> chronic bronchitis. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arzneim.-Forsch.,<br />
49: 351–358.<br />
Melli, M.S., M.R. Rashidi, <strong>and</strong> A. Delazar, et al., 2007. Effect <strong>of</strong> peppermint water on prevention <strong>of</strong> nipple<br />
cracks in lactating primiparous women: A r<strong>and</strong>omised controlled trial. Int. Breastfeeding J. 2: 7. http://<br />
internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/2/1/7.<br />
Mercier, D. <strong>and</strong> A. Knevitt, 2005. Using topical aromatherapy for the management <strong>of</strong> fungating wounds in a<br />
palliative care unit. J. Wound Care, 14: 497–501.<br />
Mickelfield, G., I, Greving, <strong>and</strong> B. May, 2000. Effects <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil <strong>and</strong> caraway oil on gastroduodenal<br />
motility. Phytother. Res., 14: 20–23.<br />
Micklefield, G., O. Jung, I. Greving, <strong>and</strong> B. May, 2003. Effects <strong>of</strong> intraduodenal application <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil<br />
(WS ® 1340) <strong>and</strong> caraway oil (WS ® 1520) on gastrointestinal motility in healthy volunteers. Phytother.<br />
Res., 17: 135–140.<br />
Middleton, B. <strong>and</strong> K.-P. Hui, 1982. Inhibition <strong>of</strong> hepatic S-3-hydrox-3-methylglutaryl-CoA redsuctase <strong>and</strong> in vivo<br />
rates <strong>of</strong> lipogenesis by a mixture <strong>of</strong> pure cyclic monoterpenes. Biochem. Pharmacol., 31: 2897–2901.<br />
Mizuno, S., M. Kimitoshi, K.Ono, O. Yoshiki; et al., 2006. Oral peppermint oil is a useful antispasmodic for<br />
double-contrast barium meal examination. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 21: 1297–1301.<br />
Moran, J., M. Addy, <strong>and</strong> R. Newcombe, 1997. A 4-day plaque regrowth study comparing an essential oil<br />
mouthrinse with a triclosan mouthrinse. J. Clin. Periodontol., 24: 636–639.<br />
Morice, A.H., G.A. Fontana, A.R. Sovijarvi, et al. 2004. The diagnosis <strong>and</strong> management <strong>of</strong> chronic cough. Eur.<br />
Resp., J. 24: 481–492.<br />
Morice, A.H., A.E. Marshall, K.S. Higgins, <strong>and</strong> T.J. Grattan, 1994. Effect <strong>of</strong> menthol on citric acid induced<br />
cough in normal subjects. Thorax, 49: 1024–1026.<br />
Mukamel, E., D. Engelstein, D. Simon, <strong>and</strong> C. Servadio, 1987. The value <strong>of</strong> Rowatinex in the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
ureterolithiasis. J. Urol., 93: 31–33.<br />
Nishino, T, Y. Tagaito, <strong>and</strong> Y. Sakurai, 1997. Nasal inhalation <strong>of</strong> l-menthol reduces respiratory discomfort associated<br />
with loaded breathing. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Med., 155: 309–313.<br />
Oladimeji, F.A., L.O. Orafidiya, T.A.B. Ogunniyi, T.A. Adewunmi, <strong>and</strong> O. Onayemi, 2005. A comparative<br />
study <strong>of</strong> the scabicidal activities <strong>of</strong> formulations <strong>of</strong> essential oil <strong>of</strong> Lippia multifl ora Moldenke <strong>and</strong> benzyl<br />
benzoate emulsion BP. Int. J. Aromather., 15: 87–93.<br />
Orl<strong>and</strong>o da Fonseca, C., G. Schwartsmann, J. Fischer, et al., 2008. Preliminary results from a phase I/II study<br />
<strong>of</strong> perillyl alcohol intranasal administration in adults with recurrent malignant gliomas. Surg. Neurol., 70:<br />
259–267.<br />
Orafidiya, L.O., E.O. Agbani, A.O. Oyedele, O.O. Babalola, <strong>and</strong> O. Onayemi, 2002. Preliminary clinical tests<br />
on topical preparations <strong>of</strong> Ocimum gratissimum Linn. leaf essential oil for the treatment <strong>of</strong> acne vulgaris.<br />
Clin. Drug Invest., 22(5): 313–319.<br />
Orafidiya, L.O., E.O. Agbani, A.O. Oyedele, O.O. Babalola, O. Onayemi, <strong>and</strong> F.F. Aiyedun, 2004. The effect<br />
<strong>of</strong> aloe vera gel on the anti-acne properties <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Ocimum gratissimum Linn.—a preliminary<br />
clinical investigation. Int. J. Aromather., 14: 15–21.<br />
Orani, G.P., J.W. Anderson, G. Sant’Ambrogio, <strong>and</strong> F.B. Sant’Ambrogio, 1991. Upper airway cooling <strong>and</strong><br />
l-menthol reduce ventilation in the guinea pig. J. Appl. Physiol., 70: 2080–2086.<br />
Ostad, S.N., M. Soodi, M. Sharifzadeh, <strong>and</strong> N. Khorsidi, 2001. The effect <strong>of</strong> fennel essential oil on uterine<br />
contraction as a model for dysmenorrhoea, pharmacology <strong>and</strong> toxicology study. J. Ethnopharmacol., 76:<br />
299–304.<br />
Packman, E.W. <strong>and</strong> S.J. London, 1980. The utility <strong>of</strong> artificially induced cough as a clinical model for evaluating<br />
the antitussive effects <strong>of</strong> aromatics delivered by inunction. Eur. J. Resp. Dis., 61(Suppl 10): 101–109.<br />
Peiffer, C., J-B. Pline, L. Thivard, M. Aubier, <strong>and</strong> Y. Samson, 2001. Neural substrates for the perception <strong>of</strong><br />
acutely induced dyspnea. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care, 163: 951–957.<br />
Pélissier, Y., C. Marion, J. Casadebaig, et al., 1994. A chemical bacteriological, toxicological <strong>and</strong> clinical study<br />
<strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Lippia multifl ora Mold. (Verbenaceae). J. Essent. Oil Res., 6: 623–630.<br />
Perfumi, M., F. Paparelli, <strong>and</strong> M.L. Cingolani, 1995. Spasmolytic activity <strong>of</strong> essential oil <strong>of</strong> Artemisia thuscula<br />
Cav. from the Canary Isl<strong>and</strong>s. J. Essent. Oil Res., 7: 387–392.<br />
Pittler, M.H. <strong>and</strong> E. Ernst, 1998. Peppermint oil for irritable bowel syndrome: A critical review <strong>and</strong> metaanalysis.<br />
Am. J. Gastroenterol., 93: 1131–1135.<br />
Post-White, J. <strong>and</strong> W. Nichols, 2007. R<strong>and</strong>omised rrial testing <strong>of</strong> QueaseEase essential oil for motion sickness.<br />
Int. J. Essent. Oil Ther., 1: 143–152.
350 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Pritchard, A.J.N., 2004. The use <strong>of</strong> essential oils to treat snoring. Phytother. Res. 18: 696–699;<br />
Psychoneuroendocrinology, 33: 328–339.<br />
Ramadan, W., B. Mourad, S. Ibrahim, <strong>and</strong> F. Sonbol, 1996. Oil <strong>of</strong> bitter orange: New topical antifungal agent.<br />
Int. J. Dermatol., 35: 448–449.<br />
Raman, A., U. Weir, <strong>and</strong> S.F. Bloomfield, 1995. Antimicrobial effects <strong>of</strong> tea tree oil <strong>and</strong> its major components<br />
on Staphylococcus aureus, Staph. epidermidis <strong>and</strong> Propionibacterium acnes. Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 21:<br />
242–245.<br />
Rangelov, A.M., D. Toreva <strong>and</strong> R. Kosev, 1988. Experimental study <strong>of</strong> the cholagogic <strong>and</strong> choleretic action <strong>of</strong><br />
some <strong>of</strong> the basic ingredients <strong>of</strong> essential oils on laboratory animals. Folia Medica (Plovdiv), 30: 30–38.<br />
Reddy, B.S., C.-X. Wang, H. Samaha, et al., 1997. Chemoprevention <strong>of</strong> colon carcinogenesis by dietary perillyl<br />
alcohol. Cancer Res., 57: 420–425.<br />
Rees, W.D.W., B.K. Evans, <strong>and</strong> J. Rhodes, 1979. Treating irritable bowel syndrome with peppermint oil. Br.<br />
Med. J., 2: 835–836.<br />
Reiter, M. <strong>and</strong> W. Br<strong>and</strong>t, 1985. Relaxant effects on tracheal <strong>and</strong> ileal smooth muscles <strong>of</strong> the guinea pig.<br />
Arzneim.-Forsch., 35: 408–414.<br />
Remberg, P., L. Björk, T. Hedner, <strong>and</strong> O. Sterner, 2004. Characteristics, clinical effect pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>and</strong> tolerability<br />
<strong>of</strong> a nasal spray preparation <strong>of</strong> Artemisia abrotanum L. for allergic rhinitis. Phytomedicine, 11: 36–42.<br />
Riep, B.G., J.-P. Bernimoulin, <strong>and</strong> M.L. Barnett, 1999. Comparative antiplaque effectiveness <strong>of</strong> an essential oil<br />
<strong>and</strong> an amione fluoride/stannous fluoride mouthrinse. J. Clin. Periodontol., 26: 164–168.<br />
Ro, Y.-J., H.-C. Ha, C.-G. Kim, <strong>and</strong> H.-A. Yeom, 2002. The effects <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy on pruritis in patients<br />
undergoing hemodialysis. Dermatol. Nurs., 14:231–238.<br />
Sant’Ambrogio, F.B., J.W. Anderson, <strong>and</strong> G. Sant’Ambrogio, 1991. Effect <strong>of</strong> l-menthol on laryngeal receptors.<br />
J. Appl. Physiol., 70: 788–793.<br />
Sant’Ambrogio, F.B., J.W. Anderson, <strong>and</strong> G. Sant’Ambrogio, 1992. Menthol in upper airway depresses ventilation<br />
in newborne dogs. Resp. Physiol., 89: 299–307.<br />
Satchell, A.C., A. Saurajen, C. Bell, <strong>and</strong> R. StC. Barnetson, 2002a. Treatment <strong>of</strong> d<strong>and</strong>ruff with 5% tea tree oil<br />
shampoo. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 47: 852–855.<br />
Satchell, A.C., A. Saurajen, C. Bell, <strong>and</strong> R. StC. Barnetson, 2002b. Treatment <strong>of</strong> interdigital tinea pedis with<br />
25% <strong>and</strong> 50% tea tree oil solution: A r<strong>and</strong>omised, placebo-controlled, blinded study. Aust. J. Dermatol.,<br />
45: 175–178.<br />
Scanni, G. <strong>and</strong> E. Bonifazi, 2006. Efficacy <strong>of</strong> a single application <strong>of</strong> a new natural lice removal product.<br />
Preliminary data. Eur. J. Pediatr. Dermatol., 16: 231–234.<br />
Schäfer, D. <strong>and</strong> W. Schäfer, 1981. Pharmakologische Untersuchungen zur broncholytischen und sekretolytischexpektorierenden<br />
Wirksamkeit einer Salbe auf der Basis von Menthol, Camphor und ätherischen Ölen.<br />
Arzneim.-Forsch., 31(1): 82–86.<br />
Schnitzler, P., A. Schumacher, A. Astani, <strong>and</strong> J. Reichling, 2008. Melissa <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis oil affects infectivity <strong>of</strong><br />
enveloped herpesviruses. Phytomedicine, 15: 734–740.<br />
Shahi, S.K., A.C. Shukla, A.K. Bajaj, et al., 2000. Broad spectrum herbal therapy against superficial fungal<br />
infections. Skin Pharmacol. Appl. Skin Physiol., 13: 60–64.<br />
Shaw, G., E.D. Srivastava, M. Sadlier, P. Swann, J.Y. James, <strong>and</strong> J. Rhodes, 1991. Stress management for irritable<br />
bowel syndrome: A controlled trial. Digestion, 50: 36–42.<br />
Sherry, E., S. Sivananthan, P. Warnke, <strong>and</strong> G.D. Eslick, 2003. Topical phytochemicals used to salvage the gangrenous<br />
lower limbs <strong>of</strong> type I diabetic patients [letter]. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract., 62: 65–66.<br />
Siller, G., S. Kottasz, <strong>and</strong> Z. Palfi, 1998. Effect <strong>of</strong> Rowatinex on expulsion <strong>of</strong> post ESWL residual calculi.<br />
Magyar Urologia., 10: 139–146.<br />
Sivropoulou, A., C. Nikolaou, E. Papanikolaou, S. Kokkini, T. Lanaras, <strong>and</strong> M. Arsenakis, 1997. Antimicrobial,<br />
cytotoxic <strong>and</strong> antiviral activities <strong>of</strong> Salvia fruticosa essential oil. J. Agric. Food Chem., 45: 3197–3201.<br />
Sloan, A., S.C. De Cort, <strong>and</strong> R. Eccles, 1993. Prolongation <strong>of</strong> breath-hold time following treatment with an<br />
l-menthol lozenge in healthy man. J. Physiol., 473: 53.<br />
Soukoulis, S. <strong>and</strong> R. Hirsch, 2004. The effects <strong>of</strong> a tea tree oil-containing gel on plaque <strong>and</strong> chronic gingivitis.<br />
Aust. Dent. J., 49: 78–83.<br />
Stankusheva, T., L. Balabanski, <strong>and</strong> R. Girosital, 1988. Hypolipidemic effect. Medico Biologic Info., 3: 23–25.<br />
Stotz, S.C., J. Vtiens, D. Martyn, J. Clardy, <strong>and</strong> D.E. Clapham, 2008. Citral sensing by transient receptor potential<br />
channels in dorsal root ganglions. PLoS ONE, 3:e2082. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002082.<br />
Su, XC. Y., A. Wan Po, <strong>and</strong> J.S. Millership, 1993. Ciliotoxicity <strong>of</strong> intranasal formulations: Menthol enantiomers.<br />
Chirality, 5: 58–60.<br />
Sybilska, D. <strong>and</strong> M. Asztemborska, 2002. Chiral recognition <strong>of</strong> terpenoids in some pharmaceuticals derived<br />
from natural sources. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods., 54: 187–195.
Phytotherapeutic Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 351<br />
Syed, T.A., Z.A. Qureshi, S.M. Ali, S. Ahmed, <strong>and</strong> S.A. Ahmed, 1999. Treatment <strong>of</strong> toenail onychomycosis<br />
with 2% butenafine <strong>and</strong> 5% Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil in cream. Trop. Med. Int. Health,<br />
4: 284–487.<br />
Taddei, I., D. Giachetti, E. Taddei, P. Mantovani, 1988. Spasmolytic activity <strong>of</strong> peppermint, sage <strong>and</strong> rosemary<br />
essences <strong>and</strong> their major constituents. Fitoterapia, 59: 463–468.<br />
Takarada, K., R. Kimizuka, N. Takahashi, K. Honma, K. Okuda, <strong>and</strong> T. Kato, 2004 A comparison <strong>of</strong> the antibacterial<br />
efficacies <strong>of</strong> essential oils against oral pathogens. Oral Microbiol. Immunol., 19: 61–64.<br />
Tamaoki, J., A. Chiyotani, A. Sakai, H. Takemura, <strong>and</strong> K. Konno, 1995. Effect <strong>of</strong> menthol vapour on airway<br />
hyperresponsiveness in patients with mild asthma. Resp. Med., 89: 503–504.<br />
Taylor, B.A., H.L. Duthie, <strong>and</strong> D.K. Luscombe, 1985. Calcium antagonist activity <strong>of</strong> menthol on gastrointestinal<br />
smooth muscle. Br. J. Clin. Pharm., 20: 293–294.<br />
Taylor, B.A., D.K. Luscombe, <strong>and</strong> H.L. Duthie, 1984. Inhibitory effects <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil <strong>and</strong> menthol on<br />
human isolated coli. Gut, 25: A1168–A1169.<br />
Thut, P.D., D. Wrigley, <strong>and</strong> M.S. Gold, 2003. Cold transduction in rat trigeminal ganglia neurons in vitro.<br />
Neuroscience, 119: 1071–1083.<br />
Tovey, E.R. <strong>and</strong> L.G. McDonald, 1997. A simple washing procedure with eucalyptus oil for controlling house<br />
dust mites <strong>and</strong> their allergens in clothing <strong>and</strong> bedding. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 100: 464–466.<br />
Tufekci, E., Z.A. Casagr<strong>and</strong>e, S.J. Lindauer, C.E. Fowler, <strong>and</strong> K.T. Williams, 2008. Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> an essential<br />
oil mouthrinse in improving oral health in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthodonist, 78: 294–98.<br />
Uedo, N., M. Tatsuta, H. Iishi, et al., 1999. Inhibition by d-limonene <strong>of</strong> gastric carcinogenesis induced by<br />
N-methyl-N’-nitro-N-nitroguanidine in Wistar rats. Cancer Lett., 137: 131–136.<br />
von Bergmann, K., A. Beck, C. Engel, <strong>and</strong> O. Leiß, 1987. Administration <strong>of</strong> a terpene mixture inhibits cholesterol<br />
nucleation in bile from patients with cholesterol gallstones. J. Mol. Med., 65: 1432–1440.<br />
Ulmer, W.T. <strong>and</strong> D. Schött, 1991. Chronisch-obstruktive Bronchitis. Wirkung von Gelomyrtol forte in einer<br />
plazebokontrollierten Doppelblindstudie. Fortschr. Med., 109: 547–550.<br />
Walton, S.F., M. McKinnon, S. Pizzutto, A. Dougall, E. Williams, <strong>and</strong> B.J. Currie, 2004. Acaricidal activity <strong>of</strong><br />
Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil: In vitro sensitivity <strong>of</strong> Sarcoptes scabiei var hominis to terpinen-4-ol.<br />
Arch. Dermatol., 140: 563–566.<br />
Warnke, P., E. Sherry, P.A.J. Russo, et al., 2006. Antibacterial essential oils in malodorous cancer patients:<br />
Clinical observations in 30 patients. Phytomedicine, 13: 463–467.<br />
Warnke, P., H. Terheyden, Y. Açil, <strong>and</strong> I.N. Springer, 2004. Tumor smell reduction with antibacterial essential<br />
oils [letter]. Cancer, 100: 879–880.<br />
Welsh, M.J., J.H. Widdiscombe, <strong>and</strong> J.A. Nadel, 1980. Fluid transport across canine tracheal epithelium.<br />
J. Appl. Physiol., 49: 905–909.<br />
White, D.A., S.P. Thompson, C.G. Wilson, <strong>and</strong> G.D. Bell, 1987. A pharmacokinetic comparison <strong>of</strong> two delayedrelease<br />
peppermint oil preparations, Colpermin <strong>and</strong> Mintec, for treatment <strong>of</strong> the irritable bowel syndrome.<br />
Int. J. Pharm., 40: 151–155.<br />
Wilkins, J., 2002. Method for treating gastrointestinal disorder. U.S. Patent 642045.<br />
Williamson, E.M., C.M. Priestley, <strong>and</strong> I.F. Burgess, 2007. An investigation <strong>and</strong> comparison <strong>of</strong> the bioactivity<br />
<strong>of</strong> selected essential oil on human lice <strong>and</strong> house dust mites. Fitoterapia, 78: 521–525.<br />
Wittmann, M., W. Petro, P. Kaspar, R. Repges, <strong>and</strong> U. Dethlefsen, 1998. Zur therapie chronisch obstruktiver<br />
atemwegserkrankungen mit sekretolytika. Atemw.-Lungenkrank., 24: 67–74.<br />
Wright, C.E., W.P. Bowen, T.J. Grattan, <strong>and</strong> A.H. Morice, 1998. Identification <strong>of</strong> the l-menthol binding site in<br />
guinea pig lung membranes. Br. J. Pharmacol., 123: 481–486.<br />
Wright, C.E., E.A. Laude, T.J. Grattan, <strong>and</strong> A.H. Morice, 1997. Capsaicin <strong>and</strong> neurokinin A-induced bronchoconstriction<br />
in the anaesthetised guinea pig: Evidence for a direct action <strong>of</strong> menthol on isolated bronchial<br />
smooth muscle. Br. J. Pharmacol., 121: 1645–1650.<br />
Xing, H., J.X. Ling, M. Chen, et al., 2008. TRPM8 mechanism <strong>of</strong> autonomic nerve response to cold in respiratory<br />
airway. Mol. Pain, 4: 22. http://www.molecularpain.com/content/4/1/22<br />
Yamamoto, N., Y. Nakai, N. Sasahira, et al., 2006. Efficacy <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil as an antispasmodic during<br />
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 21: 1394–1398.<br />
Yang, Y.C., H.S. Lee, J.M. Clark, <strong>and</strong> Y.J. Ahn, 2004. Insecticidal activity <strong>of</strong> plant essential oils against Pediculus<br />
humanus capitis (Anoplura: Pediculidae). J. Med. Entomol., 41: 699–704.<br />
Yip, Y.B. <strong>and</strong> A.C.Y. Tam, 2008. An experimental study on the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> massage with aromatic ginger<br />
<strong>and</strong> orange essential oil for moderate-to-severe knee pain among the elderly in Hong Kong. Compl. Ther.<br />
Med., 16: 131–138.<br />
Zanker, K.S. <strong>and</strong> G. Blumel, 1983. Terpene-induced lowering <strong>of</strong> surface tension in vitro: A rationale for surfactant<br />
substitution. Res. Exper. Med., 182(1): 33–38.
12<br />
In Vitro Antimicrobial<br />
Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Monographed in the European<br />
Pharmacopoeia 6th Edition<br />
Alex<strong>and</strong>er Pauli <strong>and</strong> Heinz Schilcher<br />
CONTENTS<br />
12.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 353<br />
12.1.1 Agar Diffusion Test (ADT) ................................................................................ 354<br />
12.1.2 Dilution Test (DIL) ............................................................................................. 354<br />
12.1.3 Vapor Phase Test (VP) ....................................................................................... 355<br />
12.2 Results ............................................................................................................................. 534<br />
12.3 Discussion ....................................................................................................................... 537<br />
References .................................................................................................................................. 540<br />
12.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the first systematic in vitro examinations <strong>of</strong> the antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils dates<br />
back to the late nineteenth century when Buchholtz studied the growth inhibitory properties <strong>of</strong> caraway<br />
oil, thyme oil, phenol, <strong>and</strong> thymol on bacteria having been cultivated in a tabac decoction. In<br />
this examination, thymol turned out to be 10-fold stronger than phenol (Buchholtz, 1875), which<br />
was in use as surgical antiseptic at that time (Ashhurst, 1927). The German pharmacopoeia<br />
“Deutsches Arzneibuch 6” (DAB 6) issued in 1926 <strong>and</strong> later supplements (1947, 1959) listed together<br />
26 essential oils, <strong>and</strong> by this it has become obvious that essential oils have a long history in pharmaceutical<br />
practice due to their pharmacological activities. The European Pharmacopoeia 6th edition<br />
issued in 2007 lists 28 essential oils. Among them are 20 oils already present in DAB 6 (anise, bitter<br />
fennel, caraway, cassia, cinnamon bark, citronella, clove, cori<strong>and</strong>er, eucalyptus, juniper, lavender,<br />
lemon, matricaria, neroli, peppermint, pine needle, pumilio pine, rosemary, thyme, <strong>and</strong> turpentine),<br />
three oils have been previously listed in the British Pharmacopoeia in the year 1993 (dementholized<br />
mint, nutmeg, <strong>and</strong> sweet orange), one in the French Pharmacopoeia X (star anise), <strong>and</strong> five oils were<br />
added later (cinnamon leaf, clary sage, m<strong>and</strong>arin, star anise, <strong>and</strong> tea tree).<br />
Since essential oils are subject for pharmacological studies, tests on their antimicrobial activities<br />
have been done frequently. In consequence, a comprehensive data material exists, which, however,<br />
has never been compiled together for important essential oils, like such listed actually in the<br />
European Pharmacopoeia. Therefore, an attempt was done to collect <strong>and</strong> examine such information<br />
353
354 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
from scientific literature to obtain an insight into the variability <strong>of</strong> test parameters, data variation,<br />
<strong>and</strong> the significance <strong>of</strong> such factors in the interpretation <strong>of</strong> results.<br />
Among the testing methods used to characterize in vitro antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils,<br />
the three main methods turned out to be agar diffusion test, serial broth or agar dilution test, <strong>and</strong> the<br />
vapor phase test. Further tests comprise various kill-time studies, for example, the activity <strong>of</strong> a<br />
compound relative to phenol after 15 min (phenol coefficient) (Rideal et al., 1903), killing time<br />
determination after contact to a test compounds using contaminated silk threads (Koch, 1881),<br />
recording <strong>of</strong> growth curves <strong>and</strong> determination <strong>of</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> a compound being effective to<br />
inhibit growth <strong>of</strong> 50% <strong>of</strong> test organisms (Friedman et al., 2004), poisoned food techniques in which<br />
the delay <strong>of</strong> microbial growth is determined in presence <strong>of</strong> growth inhibitors (Kurita et al., 1983;<br />
Reiss, 1982), spore germination, <strong>and</strong> short contact time studies in fungi (Smyth et al., 1932; Mikhlin<br />
et al., 1983). Other studies monitor presence or absence <strong>of</strong> growth by measuring metabolic CO 2 in<br />
yeast (Belletti et al., 2004) or visualize growth by indicators, such as sulfur salts from sulfursupplemented<br />
cow milk as growth medium (Geinitz, 1912), 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride<br />
(Canillac et al., 1996), or p-iodonitrophenyltetrazolium violet (Al-Bayati, 2008; Weseler et al.,<br />
2005). The bioautographic assay on thin-layer chromatography plates has been developed for identification<br />
<strong>of</strong> active compounds in plant extracts (Rahalison et al., 1994), but was later also taken for<br />
the examination <strong>of</strong> essential oils (Iscan et al., 2002).<br />
12.1.1 AGAR DIFFUSION TEST (ADT)<br />
In the agar diffusion test, the essential oil to be tested is placed on top <strong>of</strong> an agar surface. Two<br />
techniques exist: In the first one, the essential oil is placed onto a paper disk; in the second, a hole<br />
is made into the agar surface <strong>and</strong> the essential oil is put into the hole. In the following, the essential<br />
oil diffuses from its reservoir through the agar medium, which is seeded with microorganism.<br />
Antimicrobially active oils cause an inhibition zone around the reservoir after incubation, respectively,<br />
<strong>and</strong> normally the size <strong>of</strong> inhibition zone is regarded as measure for the antimicrobial<br />
potency <strong>of</strong> an essential oil. However, lipophilic compounds such as farnesol cause only small<br />
inhibition zones against Bacillus subtilis in the agar diffusion test (Weis, 1986), although the<br />
compound resulted in a strong inhibition in the serial dilution test (MIC = 12.5 μg/ml) (Kubo<br />
et al., 1983). Thus, strong inhibitors having low water solubility gave a poor or even negative<br />
result in the agar diffusion test. It is therefore wrong to conclude that an essential oil without<br />
resulting in an inhibition zone in the agar diffusion test is without any antimicrobially active<br />
constituents; or in other words, antimicrobially active compounds are easily overlooked by this<br />
method. Another problem is the interpretation <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> inhibition zones, which depend on<br />
both, the diffusion coefficient plus antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> every compound present in an essential<br />
oil. Beside generally unknown diffusion coefficients <strong>of</strong> essential oil constituents, the size <strong>of</strong><br />
inhibition zones is influenced by several other factors: volatilization <strong>of</strong> essential oil, disk or hole<br />
sizes, amount <strong>of</strong> compound given to disk or into hole, adsorption by the disk, agar type, agar–agar<br />
content, pH, volume <strong>of</strong> agar, microbial strains tested (Janssen et al., 1987). Taken together, this<br />
test method can be used as a pretest, but the results should not be over-rated. In the following data<br />
schedule the experimental conditions are briefly given (culture medium, incubation temperature,<br />
incubation time, disk or hole size, amount <strong>of</strong> essential oil on disk or hole). The amount <strong>of</strong> compound<br />
in microgram added to a reservoir (disk or hole) is recalculated from microliter with a<br />
density <strong>of</strong> 1 for all essential oils.<br />
12.1.2 DILUTION TEST (DIL)<br />
In the dilution test, the essential oil to be tested is incorporated in a semisolid agar medium or liquid<br />
broth in several defined amounts. Absence <strong>of</strong> growth in agar plates or test tubes is determined with
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 355<br />
the naked eye after incubation. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is the concentration<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oil present in the ungrown agar plate or test tube with the highest amount <strong>of</strong> test material.<br />
When essential oils are tested, the main difficulty is caused by their low water solubility. The addition<br />
<strong>of</strong> solvents (e.g., dimethylsulfoxide <strong>and</strong> ethanol) or detergents (e.g., Tween 20) to the growth<br />
medium are unavoidable, which however influences the MIC (Hili et al., 1997; Hammer et al., 1999;<br />
Remmal et al., 1993). Another problem is the volatilization <strong>of</strong> essential oils during incubation.<br />
Working in a chamber with saturated moistened atmosphere (Pauli, 2006) or high water activity<br />
levels (Guynot et al., 2005) improved the situation. The MIC is additionally influenced by the selection<br />
<strong>of</strong> growth media, for example, in RPMI 1640, the MIC toward yeast is about 15 times lower<br />
than in Sabouraud medium (Jirovetz et al., 2007; McCarthy et al., 1992). Further MIC-influencing<br />
test parameters are size <strong>of</strong> inoculum, pH <strong>of</strong> growth medium, <strong>and</strong> incubation time. Nevertheless, the<br />
serial dilution test in liquid broth was recommended for natural substances (Boesel, 1991; Hadacek<br />
et al., 2000; Pauli, 2007) <strong>and</strong> is st<strong>and</strong>ardized for the testing <strong>of</strong> antibacterial <strong>and</strong> antifungal drugs in<br />
liquid broth <strong>and</strong> agar plates (Clinical & Laboratory St<strong>and</strong>ards Institute, 2008). Its use enables a link<br />
to data <strong>of</strong> pharmaceutical drugs <strong>and</strong> an easier interpretation <strong>of</strong> test results. In the data section, all<br />
concentrations are recalculated in μg/ml. To distinguish between the agar dilution test <strong>and</strong> the serial<br />
dilution test, the growth medium is abbreviated either as agar (A) or broth (B). Test parameters—<br />
exceptionally citations—are systematically given <strong>and</strong> comprise growth medium, incubation time,<br />
incubation temperature, <strong>and</strong> MIC in μg/ml or ppm.<br />
12.1.3 VAPOR PHASE TEST (VP)<br />
In the vapor phase, a st<strong>and</strong>ardized method does not exist among tests to study antimicrobial activity<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils. In most <strong>of</strong> the examinations, a reservoir (paper disk, cup, <strong>and</strong> glass) contains the<br />
sample <strong>of</strong> essential oil, <strong>and</strong> a seeded agar plate was inverted <strong>and</strong> covered the reservoir. After inoculation,<br />
an inhibition zone is formed, which is the measure <strong>of</strong> activity. Most <strong>of</strong> the data listed in the<br />
following tables have been worked out by such methods. Because these methods allow only the<br />
creation <strong>of</strong> relative values, a few examiners defined the MIC in atmosphere (MIC air ) by using airtight<br />
boxes (Inouye et al., 2001; Nakahara et al., 2003), which contained a seeded agar plate <strong>and</strong> the<br />
essential oil on the glass or paper. Otherwise, the results were estimated with +++ = normal growth,<br />
++ = reduced growth, + = visible growth, <strong>and</strong> NG = no growth. The test parameters given in the<br />
following tables are growth medium, incubation time, incubation temperature, <strong>and</strong> activity evaluation<br />
or MIC air in μg/ml or ppm.<br />
To give detailed information, the following abbreviations are used in Tables 12.1 through 12.80:<br />
(h), essential oil was given into a hole; BA, Bacto agar; BHA, brain–heart infusion agar; BlA, blood<br />
agar; CA, Czapek’s agar; CAB, Campylobacter agar base; CDA, Czapek Dox agar; DMSO, dimethylsulfoxide;<br />
EtOH, ethanol; EYA, Emerson’s Ybss agar; germ., germination; HIB, heart infusion<br />
broth; HS, horse serum; inh., inhibition; ISA, Iso-sensitest agar; KBA, King’s medium B agar; LA,<br />
Laury agar; LSA, Listeria selective agar; MA, malt agar; MAA, medium A agar; MBA, mycobiotic<br />
agar; MCA, MacConkey agar; MEB, malt extract broth; MHA, Mueller–Hinton agar; MHA,<br />
Mueller–Hinton broth; MIA, minimum inhibitory amount in μg per disk; MIC, minimum inhibitory<br />
concentration in μg/ml or ppm; MIC air , minimal inhibitory concentration in μg/ml or ppm in<br />
the vapor phase; MYA, malt extract–yeast extract–peptone–glucose agar; MYB, malt extract–yeast<br />
extract–glucose–peptone broth; NA, nutrient agar; NB, nutrient broth; OA, oat agar; PB, Pennassay<br />
broth; Ref., reference number; SA, Sabouraud agar; SB, Sabouraud broth; sd, saturated disk; SDA,<br />
Sabouraud dextrose agar; SGB, Sabouraud glucose broth; SMA, Sabouraud maltose agar; sol., solution;<br />
TYA, tryptone–glucose–yeast extract agar; THB, Todd–Hewitt broth; TSA, trypticase soy<br />
agar; TSB, trypticase soy broth; TYB, tryptone–glucose–yeast extract broth; VC, various conditions:<br />
not given in detail; WA, sucrose–peptone agar; WFA, wheat flour agar; YPB, <strong>and</strong> yeast<br />
extract–peptone–dextrose broth.
356 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.1<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Anise Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters<br />
Disk Size (mm),<br />
Quantity (µg)<br />
Inhibition<br />
Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Aeromonas hydrophila Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Alcaligenes faecalis Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Beneckea natriegens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- TSA, 24 h, 42°C 4 (h), 25,000 4.5 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Citrobacter freundii Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterococcus faecalis Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5000 on agar 0 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Erwinia carotovora Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 0 Narasimha Rao <strong>and</strong> Nigam (1970)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited 15, 2500 1 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 4.5 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 11 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Flavobacterium suaveolens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 0 Narasimha Rao <strong>and</strong> Nigam (1970)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Moraxella sp. Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Neisseria perfl ava Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 1 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 1 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 1.5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 357<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 0 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 6.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Pseudomonas sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5000 on agar 0 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 4.5 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Salmonella pullorum Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Salmonella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 16 Narasimha Rao <strong>and</strong> Nigam (1970)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 1 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Serratia sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 1 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Shigella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 1 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Vibrio cholerae Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 17 Narasimha Rao <strong>and</strong> Nigam (1970)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus mesentericus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus sp. Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 1 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 8 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 12.5 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Brevibacterium linens Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Brochotrix thermosphacta Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5000 on agar 0 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Brochotrix thermosphacta Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 5.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Clostridium sporogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheriae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 0 Narasimha Rao <strong>and</strong> Nigam (1970)<br />
Lactobacillus delbrueckii Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5000 on agar 0 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5000 on agar 0 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Lactococcus garvieae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5000 on agar 0 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5000 on agar 0 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Leuconostoc cremoris Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
continued
358 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.1 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters<br />
Disk Size (mm),<br />
Quantity (µg)<br />
Inhibition<br />
Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5000 on agar 0 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 4 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 18 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 0 Narasimha Rao <strong>and</strong> Nigam (1970)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5000 on agar 0 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 1 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 4 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 8.3 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 14.5 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 4 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 12 Narasimha Rao <strong>and</strong> Nigam (1970)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Streptococcus sp. Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 16 Narasimha Rao <strong>and</strong> Nigam (1970)<br />
Streptococcus viridans Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Streptomyces venezuelae Bac+ SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Alternaria porri Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 35 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Alternaria solani Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 9 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi Cited —, pure 28 Gangrade et al. (1991)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 9 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, 48 h, 28°C 5, 5000 0 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 13 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi Cited —, pure 27 Gangrade et al. (1991)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 359<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 60 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum Fungi Cited —, pure 32 Gangrade et al. (1991)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cicer Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 15 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Geotrichum sp. Fungi SDA, 2–7 d, 20°C 5 (h), 60,000 17 Kosalec et al. (2005)<br />
Helminthosporium sativum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 10 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Microsporum canis Fungi SDA, 2–7 d, 20°C 5 (h), 60,000 27 Kosalec et al. (2005)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi SDA, 2–7 d, 20°C 5 (h), 60,000 21 Kosalec et al. (2005)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 12 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Nigrospora panici Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 12 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 60 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 15 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 13 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi SDA, 2–7 d, 20°C 5 (h), 60,000 23 Kosalec et al. (2005)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi SDA, 2–7 d, 20°C 5 (h), 60,000 25 Kosalec et al. (2005)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 12 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 18 h, 30°C 6 (h), pure 15 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 2–7 d, 20°C 5 (h), 60,000 29 Kosalec et al. (2005)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida glabrata Yeast SDA, 2–7 d, 20°C 5 (h), 60,000 21 Kosalec et al. (2005)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast SDA, 2–7 d, 20°C 5 (h), 60,000<br />
a<br />
Kosalec et al. (2005)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida parapsilosis Yeast SDA, 2–7 d, 20°C 5 (h), 60,000 30 Kosalec et al. (2005)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida pseudotropicalis Yeast SDA, 2–7 d, 20°C 5 (h), 60,000<br />
a<br />
Kosalec et al. (2005)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast SDA, 2–7 d, 20°C 5 (h), 60,000<br />
a<br />
Kosalec et al. (2005)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 9 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus rhodobenhani Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
a<br />
Fungicidal.
360 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.2<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Anise Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters MIC (µg/mL) Ref.<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- TSB, 24 h, 42°C >10,000 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSB, 24 h, 35°C >10,000 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSB, 24 h, 37°C >10,000 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C >500 Al-Bayati (2008)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Helicobacter pylori Bac- Cited, 20 h, 37°C 294.7–589.4 Weseler et al. (2005)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- MHB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C >500 Al-Bayati (2008)<br />
Proteus mirabilis Bac- MHB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C 125 Al-Bayati (2008)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- MHB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C 62.5 Al-Bayati (2008)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C >500 Al-Bayati (2008)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C >50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- TSB, 24 h, 35°C >10,000 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- MHB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C 500 Al-Bayati (2008)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- TSB, 24 h, 37°C >10,000 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- MHB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C 250 Al-Bayati (2008)<br />
Bacillus cereus Bac+ MHB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C 62.5 Al-Bayati (2008)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 1600 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Brochotrix thermosphacta Bac+ M17, 24 h, 20°C >10,000 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSB, 24 h, 35°C >10,000 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TSB, 24 h, 35°C >10,000 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C 125 Al-Bayati (2008)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 25,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Alternaria alternata Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Alternaria tenuissima Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 361<br />
Aspergillus awamorii Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 7–14 d, 28°C 500 Soliman <strong>and</strong> Badeaa (2002)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 6–8 h 20°C, spore germ. inh. 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 1600 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi YES broth, 10 d 83% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi PDA, 7–14 d, 28°C 500 Soliman <strong>and</strong> Badeaa (2002)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi YES broth, 10 d 82% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus oryzae Fungi Cited 250 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 7–14 d, 28°C 500 Soliman <strong>and</strong> Badeaa (2002)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 6–8 h 20°C, spore germ. inh. 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
Aspergillus sydowi Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Aspergillus tamari Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Aspergillus terreus Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Botryodiplodia theobromae Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Cephalosporium sacchari Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C 20,000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Ceratocystis paradoxa Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C 1000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Cladosporium herbarum Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Colletotrichum capsici Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Curvularia lunata Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Curvularia lunata Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C 4000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Curvularia pallescens Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Epicoccum nigrum Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Epidermophyton fl occosum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C
362 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.2 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters MIC (µg/mL) Ref.<br />
Fusarium accuminatum Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Fusarium culmorum Fungi YES broth, 10 d 69% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Fusarium equisiti Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Fusarium moniliforme Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Fusarium moniliforme Fungi PDA, 7–14 d, 28°C 500 Soliman <strong>and</strong> Badeaa (2002)<br />
Fusarium moniliforme Fungi PDA, 7 d, 23.5°C 52% inh. 10,000 Mueller-Ribeau et al. (1995)<br />
Fusarium moniliforme var. subglutinans Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C 2000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Fusarium semitectum Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Fusarium udum Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Geotrichum sp. Fungi SGB, 3–7 d, 25°C 15,600 Kosalec et al. (2005)<br />
Helminthosporium sacchari Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C 4000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Macrophomina phaesoli Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Microsporum canis Fungi SGB, 3–7 d, 25°C 1000 Kosalec et al. (2005)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi SGB, 3–7 d, 25°C 2000 Kosalec et al. (2005)<br />
Mucor hiemalis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor racemosus Fungi Cited 250 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Mucor racemosus f. racemosus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Nigrospora oryzae Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 1600 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi Cited 250 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Penicillium citrinum Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Physalospora tucumanensis Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C 2000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Phytophthora capsici Fungi PDA, 7 d, 23.5°C 36% inh. 10,000 Mueller-Ribeau et al. (1995)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 363<br />
Rhizoctonia solani Fungi PDA, 7 d, 23.5°C 100% inh. 10,000 Mueller-Ribeau et al. (1995)<br />
Rhizopus 66-81-2 Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus arrhizus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus chinensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus circinans Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus japonicus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus kazanensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi Cited 100% inh. 600 Shukla <strong>and</strong> Tripathi (1987)<br />
Rhizopus oryzae Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus pymacus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Rhizopus stolonifer Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus tritici Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Sclerotina sclerotiorum Fungi PDA, 7 d, 23.5°C 100% inh. 10,000 Mueller-Ribeau et al. (1995)<br />
Sclerotium rolfsii Fungi OA, EtOH, 6 d, 20°C 2000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C 300–625 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi SGB, 3–7 d, 25°C 7800 Kosalec et al. (2005)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C
364 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.3<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Anise Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters Quantity (µg) Activity Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 +++ Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Neisseria sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 ++ Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 ++ Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Bacillus subtilis var. aterrimus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheriae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Mycobacterium avium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 +++ Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 ++ Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium amstelodami Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium herbarum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium repens Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium rubrum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Penicillium corylophilum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 + Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 365<br />
TABLE 12.4<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Bitter Fennel Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters<br />
Disk Size (mm),<br />
Quantity (µg)<br />
Inhibition<br />
Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Aeromonas hydrophila Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Agrobacterium tumefaciens Bac- WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 2880 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Alcaligenes faecalis Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Beneckea natriegens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Burkholderia gladioli pv. agaricicola Bac- WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 7680 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Citrobacter freundii Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- MHA, 48 h, 27°C 6, 15,000 10 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Erwinia carotovora Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica Bac- WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 7680 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora Bac- WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 7680 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 0 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 5 (h), -30,000 14 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHA, 48 h, 27°C 6, 15,000 25 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA >7680 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Flavobacterium suaveolens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Moraxella sp. Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 0 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHA, 48 h, 27°C 6, 15,000 18 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Pseudomonas agarici Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA >7680 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas chichorii Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA >7680 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
continued
366 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.4 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters<br />
Disk Size (mm),<br />
Quantity (µg)<br />
Inhibition<br />
Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Pseudomonas corrugate Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA >7680 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas reactans Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA >7680 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas syringae pv. apata Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA >7680 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas syringae pv. apii Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA >7680 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas syringae pv. atr<strong>of</strong>aciens Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 3840 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas syringae pv. Glycinea Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 960 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA >7680 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA >7680 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA >7680 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA >7680 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA >7680 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA >7680 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas tolaasii Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 7680 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas viridifl ava Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA >7680 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Salmonella pullorum Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- MHA, 48 h, 27°C 6, 15,000 8 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris Bac- WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 5760 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaesoli var. fuscans Bac- WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 720 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaesoli var. phaesoli Bac- WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 480 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Xanthomonas campestris pv. Vesicatoria Bac- WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 1440 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA >7680 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 18 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Brevibacterium linens Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Brochotrix thermosphacta Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. Michiganensis Bac+ WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 7680 Cantore et al. (2004)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 367<br />
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus Bac+ WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 960 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Clostridium sporogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Curtobacterium fl accunfaciens pv. betae Bac+ WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA >7680 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Curtobacterium fl accunfaciens pv. fl accunfaciens Bac+ WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA >7680 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Leuconostoc cremoris Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 20 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Rhodococcus fascians Bac+ WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 1920 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHA, 48 h, 27°C 6, 15,000 16 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 17 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ MHA, 48 h, 27°C 6, 15,000 12 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 5 (h), -30,000 15 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Streptomyces venezuelae Bac+ SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 10 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Absidia cormybifera Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 0 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Alternaria solani Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Alternaria sp. Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 12 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Aspergillus c<strong>and</strong>idus Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 0 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 7 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 0 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 12 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus nidulans Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 9 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 12 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi MHA, 48 h, 27°C 6, 15,000 12 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 31 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Cladosporium herbarum Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 12.5 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Cunninghamella echinulata Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 21 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 0 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Helminthosporium sacchari Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 16 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
continued
368 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.4 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters<br />
Disk Size (mm),<br />
Quantity (µg)<br />
Inhibition<br />
Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Helminthosporium sativum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Humicola grisea var. thermoidea Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 0 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 14.5 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 12 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 20 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Nigrospora panici Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Penicillium aculeatum Fungi CA, 48 h, 27°C 5, sd 0 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi CA, 48 h, 27°C 5, sd 15 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 60 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 7 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Penicillium javanicum Fungi CA, 48 h, 27°C 5, sd 25 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Penicillium jensenii Fungi CA, 48 h, 27°C 5, sd 10 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Penicillium lividum Fungi CA, 48 h, 27°C 5, sd 0 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Penicillium notatum Fungi CA, 48 h, 27°C 5, sd 0 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Penicillium obscurum Fungi CA, 48 h, 27°C 5, sd 15 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Penicillium sp. I Fungi CA, 48 h, 27°C 5, sd 15 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Penicillium sp. II Fungi CA, 48 h, 27°C 5, sd 10 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Penicillium sp. III Fungi CA, 48 h, 27°C 5, sd 0 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 7 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 20 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Sporotrichum thermophile Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 25 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Thermoascus aurantiacis Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 10 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 369<br />
Thermomyces lanuginosa Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 15 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Thielava minor Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 0 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 8 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Trichothecium roseum Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 9 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Brettanomyces anomalus Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast MHA, 48 h, 27°C 6, 15,000 12 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 18 h, 30°C 6 (h), pure 24 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida lipolytica Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 15 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus rhodobenhani Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 20 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Debaryomyces hansenii Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Geotrichum c<strong>and</strong>idum Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Hansenula anomala Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kloeckera apiculata Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 10 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kluyveromyces fragilis Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Lodderomyces elongisporus Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Metchnikowia pulcherrima Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Pichia membranaefaciens Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Rhodotorula rubra Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 7 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast NA, 24 h, 20°C 5 (h), -30,000 11 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Torula glabrata Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 7 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Torula thermophila Yeast EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 20 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)
370 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.5<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Bitter Fennel Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters<br />
MIC<br />
(µg/mL)<br />
Ref.<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- MHB, 24 h, 37°C 4880 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHB, 24 h, 37°C 1220 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TYB, 18 h, 37°C 3000 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 12,500 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHB, 24 h, 37°C 9760 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 25,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- MHB, 24 h, 37°C 19,560 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 800 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHB, 24 h, 37°C 4880 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 12,500 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ TYB, 18 h, 37°C 3000 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ MHB, 24 h, 37°C 9760 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Alternaria alternata Fungi MEB, 72 h, 28°C 1500 Mimica-Dukic et al. (2003)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi MEB, 72 h, 28°C 1800–2700 Mimica-Dukic et al. (2003)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi MEB, 72 h, 28°C 1700–2200 Mimica-Dukic et al. (2003)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi MHB, 24 h, 37°C 9760 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi MEB, 72 h, 28°C 1800–2000 Mimica-Dukic et al. (2003)<br />
Aspergillus oryzae Fungi Cited 250 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Aspergillus terreus Fungi MEB, 72 h, 28°C 1800–2200 Mimica-Dukic et al. (2003)<br />
Aspergillus versicolor Fungi MEB, 72 h, 28°C 2000–2200 Mimica-Dukic et al. (2003)<br />
Cladosporium cladosporoides Fungi MEB, 72 h, 28°C 1200–1500 Mimica-Dukic et al. (2003)<br />
Epidermophyton fl occosum Fungi MEB, 72 h, 28°C 1200–1300 Mimica-Dukic et al. (2003)<br />
Fusarium tricinctum Fungi MEB, 72 h, 28°C 800–1500 Mimica-Dukic et al. (2003)<br />
Microsporum canis Fungi MEB, 72 h, 28°C 1000–1200 Mimica-Dukic et al. (2003)<br />
Mucor racemosus Fungi Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Penicillium funiculosum Fungi MEB, 72 h, 28°C 2800–3000 Mimica-Dukic et al. (2003)<br />
Penicillium ochroyloron Fungi MEB, 72 h, 28°C 2500–2800 Mimica-Dukic et al. (2003)<br />
Phomopsis helianthi Fungi MEB, 72 h, 28°C 800–1300 Mimica-Dukic et al. (2003)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 12,500 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Trichoderma viride Fungi MEB, 72 h, 28°C 2700–3200 Mimica-Dukic et al. (2003)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi MEB, 72 h, 28°C 1000–1200 Mimica-Dukic et al. (2003)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 800 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast MHB, 24 h, 37°C 4880 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast YPB, 24 h, 20°C 800 Schelz et al. (2006)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 371<br />
TABLE 12.6<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Bitter Fennel Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters Quantity (µg) Activity Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 ++ Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Neisseria sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Bacillus subtilis var. aterrimus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheriae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Mycobacterium avium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)
372 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.7<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Caraway Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters<br />
Disk Size (mm),<br />
Quantity (µg) Inhibition Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 30 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Aeromonas hydrophila Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Alcaligenes faecalis Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Beneckea natriegens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Citrobacter freundii Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 10.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterococcus faecalis Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5000 on agar 0 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Erwinia carotovora Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TYA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 4, — 4 El-Gengaihi <strong>and</strong> Zaki (1982)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 10.3 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 18 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Flavobacterium suaveolens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 5.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Moraxella sp. Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 14.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Neisseria perfl ava Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 0 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 7.3 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Pseudomonas fl uorescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 4, — 4 El-Gengaihi <strong>and</strong> Zaki (1982)<br />
Salmonella pullorum Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Salmonella sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 4, — 10 El-Gengaihi <strong>and</strong> Zaki (1982)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 373<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 13 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Actinomyces sp. Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 4, — 10 El-Gengaihi <strong>and</strong> Zaki (1982)<br />
Bacillus mesentericus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 4, — 4 El-Gengaihi <strong>and</strong> Zaki (1982)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 9 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 8.3 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 20 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Brevibacterium linens Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Brochotrix thermosphacta Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Clostridium butyricum Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 4, — 0 El-Gengaihi <strong>and</strong> Zaki (1982)<br />
Clostridium sporogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TYA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Lactobacillus delbrueckii Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5000 on agar 0 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5000 on agar 0 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Lactococcus garvieae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5000 on agar 0 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5000 on agar 0 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Leuconostoc cremoris Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5000 on agar 0 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Micrococcus sp. Bac+ NA, 48 h, 37°C 4, — 4 El-Gengaihi <strong>and</strong> Zaki (1982)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 4, — 10 El-Gengaihi <strong>and</strong> Zaki (1982)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 28 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ NA, 48 h, 37°C 4, — 4 El-Gengaihi <strong>and</strong> Zaki (1982)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TYA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 4, — 4 El-Gengaihi <strong>and</strong> Zaki (1982)<br />
continued
374 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.7 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters<br />
Disk Size (mm),<br />
Quantity (µg) Inhibition Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 7.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 17 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Streptomyces venezuelae Bac+ SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Absidia corMYBifera Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 0 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Alternaria porri Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 7.4 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Alternaria solani Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 15 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Alternaria sp. Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 0 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Aspergillus c<strong>and</strong>idus Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 13.5 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 0 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 10 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 12 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Aspergillus nidulans Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 8 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 0 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, 48 h, 28°C 5, 5000 7 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 13 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 42 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Cladosporium herbarum Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 0 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Cunninghamella echinulata Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 21 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 6 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cicer Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 11 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Helminthosporium sacchari Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 6.5 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Helminthosporium sativum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 12 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Humicola grisea var. thermoidea Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 0 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 11 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 9 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 15 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 28 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Nigrospora panici Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 15 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 375<br />
Penicillium aculeatum Fungi CA, 48 h, 27°C 5, sd 0 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi CA, 48 h, 27°C 5, sd 0 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 60 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 78 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Penicillium javanicum Fungi CA, 48 h, 27°C 5, sd 10 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Penicillium jensenii Fungi CA, 48 h, 27°C 5, sd 15 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Penicillium lividum Fungi CA, 48 h, 27°C 5, sd 0 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Penicillium notatum Fungi CA, 48 h, 27°C 5, sd 15 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Penicillium obscurum Fungi CA, 48 h, 27°C 5, sd 20 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Penicillium sp. I Fungi CA, 48 h, 27°C 5, sd 10 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Penicillium sp. II Fungi CA, 48 h, 27°C 5, sd 15 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Penicillium sp. III Fungi CA, 48 h, 27°C 5, sd 0 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 0 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 0 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Sporotrichum thermophile Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 10 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Thermoascus aurantiacis Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 10 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Thermomyces lanuginosa Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 10 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Thielava minor Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 0 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 7 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Trichothecium roseum Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 20 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Brettanomyces anomalus Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast TYA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C 4, — 0 El-Gengaihi <strong>and</strong> Zaki (1982)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 9.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 18 h, 30°C 6 (h), pure 30 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida lipolytica Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida utilis Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C 4, — 0 El-Gengaihi <strong>and</strong> Zaki (1982)<br />
Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 14 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
continued
376 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.7 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters<br />
Disk Size (mm),<br />
Quantity (µg) Inhibition Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Cryptococcus rhodobenhani Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Debaryomyces hansenii Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Geotrichum c<strong>and</strong>idum Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Hansenula anomala Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kloeckera apiculata Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kluyveromyces fragilis Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Lodderomyces elongisporus Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Metchnikowia pulcherrima Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Pichia membranaefaciens Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Rhodotorula rubra Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C 4, — 0 El-Gengaihi <strong>and</strong> Zaki (1982)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Torula glabrata Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Torula thermophila Yeast EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 10 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 377<br />
TABLE 12.8<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Caraway Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters MIC (µg/ml) Ref.<br />
Bacteria Bac 5% Glucose, 9 d, 37°C 2000 Buchholtz (1875)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TYB, 18–24 h, 37°C >1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSB, 24 h, 37°C >10,000 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 2000 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 6400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Helicobacter pylori Bac- Cited, 20 h, 37°C 273.1 Weseler et al. (2005)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C >50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas fl uorescens Bac- NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 2000 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Pseudomonas sp. Bac- TSB, 24 h, 37°C 6000 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- TSB, 24 h, 37°C >10,000 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 2500 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 1000 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Brochotrix thermosphacta Bac+ M17, 24 h, 20°C 10,000 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TYB, 18–24 h, 37°C 500 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Micrococcus sp. Bac+ NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 1000 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 750 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Sarcina sp. Bac+ NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 1250 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TSB, 24 h, 37°C 10,000 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 1250 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TYB, 18–24 h, 37°C 500 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 6400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Alternaria citri Fungi PDA, 8 d, 22°C >1000 Arras <strong>and</strong> Usai (2001)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 7–14 d, 28°C 2000 Soliman <strong>and</strong> Badeaa (2002)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 6–8 h 20°C, spore germ. inh. 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi CA, 7 d, 28°C 84–96% inh. 500 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
continued
378 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.8 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters MIC (µg/ml) Ref.<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi PDA, 7–14 d, 28°C 3000 Soliman <strong>and</strong> Badeaa (2002)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 7–14 d, 28°C 2000 Soliman <strong>and</strong> Badeaa (2002)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 6–8 h 20°C, spore germ. inh. 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
Botrytis cinera Fungi PDA, 8 d, 22°C >1000 Arras <strong>and</strong> Usai (2001)<br />
Epidermophyton fl occosum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C 300–625 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
Fusarium moniliforme Fungi PDA, 7–14 d, 28°C 3000 Soliman <strong>and</strong> Badeaa (2002)<br />
Mucor hiemalis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor racemosus f. racemosus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 800 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 1600 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi PDA, 8 d, 22°C >1000 Arras <strong>and</strong> Usai (2001)<br />
Penicillium italicum Fungi PDA, 8 d, 22°C >1000 Arras <strong>and</strong> Usai (2001)<br />
Rhizopus 66-81-2 Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus arrhizus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus chinensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus circinans Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus japonicus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus kazanensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus oryzae Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus pymacus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Rhizopus stolonifer Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus tritici Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 379<br />
TABLE 12.9<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Caraway Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters Quantity (µg) Activity Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Neisseria sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Bacillus subtilis var. aterrimus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheriae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Mycobacterium avium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)
380 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.10<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Cassia Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters<br />
Disk Size (mm),<br />
Quantity (µg)<br />
Inhibition Zone<br />
(mm) Ref.<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- MHA, 24 h, 30°C 6, 15,000 18 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- BA, 24–48 h, 37°C 12.7, sd 14 Goutham <strong>and</strong> Purohit (1974)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHA, 24 h, 30°C 6, 15,000 21 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- BA, 24–48 h, 37°C 12.7, sd 17.5 Goutham <strong>and</strong> Purohit (1974)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- BA, 24–48 h, 37°C 12.7, sd 18 Goutham <strong>and</strong> Purohit (1974)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHA, 24 h, 30°C 6, 15,000 19 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Salmonella pullorum Bac- BA, 24–48 h, 37°C 12.7, sd 13.5 Goutham <strong>and</strong> Purohit (1974)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ BA, 24–48 h, 37°C 12.7, sd 13.5 Goutham <strong>and</strong> Purohit (1974)<br />
Corynebacterium pyogenes Bac+ BA, 24–48 h, 37°C 12.7, sd 13.5 Goutham <strong>and</strong> Purohit (1974)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 20 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Pasteurella multocida Bac+ BlA, 24–48 h, 37°C 12.7, sd 19 Goutham <strong>and</strong> Purohit (1974)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ BA, 24–48 h, 37°C 12.7, sd 0 Goutham <strong>and</strong> Purohit (1974)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHA, 24 h, 37°C 6, 15,000 30 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Alternaria porri Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 45 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, 48 h, 28°C 5, 5000 40 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2006)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cicer Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 37 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 381<br />
TABLE 12.11<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Cassia Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters MIC (µg/mL) Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, cited 75–600 Ooi et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli O157:H7 Bac- BHI, 48 h, 35°C 500 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, cited 75–600 Ooi et al. (2006)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- NA, cited 75–600 Ooi et al. (2006)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- BHI, 48 h, 35°C 250 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Vibrio cholerae Bac- NA, cited 75–600 Ooi et al. (2006)<br />
Vibrio parahaemolyticus Bac- NA, cited 75–600 Ooi et al. (2006)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 24 h, 37°C 300 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ BHI, 48 h, 35°C 300 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, cited 75–600 Ooi et al. (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ BHI, 48 h, 35°C 250 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Alternaria alternata Fungi PDA, 7 d, 28°C 100% inh. 300 Feng <strong>and</strong> Zheng (2007)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi YES broth, 10 d 87% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi YES broth, 10 d 89% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus oryzae Fungi Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Aspergillus sp. Fungi NA, cited 75–150 Ooi et al. (2006)<br />
Fusarium culmorum Fungi YES broth, 10 d 54% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Fusarium sp. Fungi NA, cited 75–150 Ooi et al. (2006)<br />
Microsporum gypseum. Fungi NA, cited 18.8–37.5 Ooi et al. (2006)<br />
Mucor racemosus Fungi Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi NA, cited 18.8–37.5 Ooi et al. (2006)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi NA, cited 18.8–37.5 Ooi et al. (2006)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, cited 100–450 Ooi et al. (2006)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida glabrata Yeast NA, cited 100–450 Ooi et al. (2006)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast NA, cited 100–450 Ooi et al. (2006)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast NA, cited 100–450 Ooi et al. (2006)
382 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.12<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Cassia Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters Quantity (µg) Activity Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Neisseria sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd ++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd ++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Bacillus subtilis var. aterrimus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd ++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Bacillus subtilis var. aterrimus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd ++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheriae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Mycobacterium avium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd NG Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mycobacterium avium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd + Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd ++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd ++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd + Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd + Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 383<br />
TABLE 12.13<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Ceylon Cinnamon Bark Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters<br />
Disk Size (mm),<br />
Quantity (µg)<br />
Inhibition Zone<br />
(mm) Ref.<br />
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 16.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Aeromonas hydrophila Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 15 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Alcaligenes faecalis Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 18 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Beneckea natriegens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 27 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- TSA, 24 h, 42°C 4 (h), 25,000 8.9 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Citrobacter freundii Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 12 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 13 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Erwinia carotovora Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 16 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 10.1 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited 15, 2500 13 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 13 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 15.5 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 14.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 2000 35 Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 45 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Flavobacterium suaveolens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 22 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 18 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 11 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Moraxella sp. Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Neisseria perfl ava Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 17 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 12 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 15.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited 15, 2500 2 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
continued
384 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.13 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters<br />
Disk Size (mm),<br />
Quantity (µg)<br />
Inhibition Zone<br />
(mm) Ref.<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 13 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 7.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 17.5 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 25 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 2000 60 Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 10.9 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Salmonella pullorum Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 21.2 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Salmonella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 12 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 2000 41 Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 12 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Serratia sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 12 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Shigella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 13 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 20 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus cereus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 2000 27 Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Bacillus mesentericus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 16 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus sp. Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 25 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 16 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 21 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 25 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 23.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 2000 56 Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Brevibacterium linens Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 35 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Brochotrix thermosphacta Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Clostridium sporogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 19 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Leuconostoc cremoris Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 6.8 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 18 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 385<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 40 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 10 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 10 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 7.5 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 25 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 27.3 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 45 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 2000 57 Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 20 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Streptococcus viridans Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 8 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Streptomyces venezuelae Bac+ SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 15 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Alternaria porri Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 50 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Alternaria solani Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 12 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi SDA, 3 d, 28°C 6, sd 18 Saksena <strong>and</strong> Saksena (1984)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 19 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 16 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, 48 h, 28°C 5, 5000 43 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 60 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cicer Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 40 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Helminthosporium sativum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 15 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Keratinomyces afelloi Fungi SDA, 3 d, 28°C 6, sd 18 Saksena <strong>and</strong> Saksena (1984)<br />
Keratinophyton terreum Fungi SDA, 3 d, 28°C 6, sd 12 Saksena <strong>and</strong> Saksena (1984)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi SDA, 3 d, 28°C 6, sd 21 Saksena <strong>and</strong> Saksena (1984)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 12 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 40 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Nigrospora panici Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 15 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 60 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 17 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 19 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
continued
386 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.13 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters<br />
Disk Size (mm),<br />
Quantity (µg)<br />
Inhibition Zone<br />
(mm) Ref.<br />
Trichophyton equinum Fungi SDA, 3 d, 28°C 6, sd 28 Saksena <strong>and</strong> Saksena (1984)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi SDA, 3 d, 28°C 6, sd 28 Saksena <strong>and</strong> Saksena (1984)<br />
Brettanomyces anomalus Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 18 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 3 d, 28°C 6, sd 14 Saksena <strong>and</strong> Saksena (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 15 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 27 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 39 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 18 h, 30°C 6 (h), pure 48 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida lipolytica Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 21 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 8 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast SDA, 3 d, 28°C 6, sd 21 Saksena <strong>and</strong> Saksena (1984)<br />
Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 18 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus rhodobenhani Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 13 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Debaryomyces hansenii Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 29 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Geotrichum c<strong>and</strong>idum Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 18 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Hansenula anomala Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 16 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kloeckera apiculata Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 15 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kluyveromyces fragilis Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 8 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Lodderomyces elongisporus Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 17 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Metchnikowia pulcherrima Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 28 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Pichia membranaefaciens Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 11 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Rhodotorula rubra Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 17 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C 6.35, sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 22 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 53 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Schizosaccharomyces pombe Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 43 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Torula glabrata Yeast MYA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 20 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Torula utilis Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 42 Hili et al. (1997)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 387<br />
TABLE 12.14<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Ceylon Cinnamon Bark Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters MIC (µg/mL) Ref.<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- TSB, 24 h, 42°C 500 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, 16 h, 37°C 200 Lens-Lisbonne et al. (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSB, 24 h, 35°C 500 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MYB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 67% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Escherichia coli O157:H7 Bac- BHI, 48 h, 35°C 250 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, 16 h, 37°C 300 Lens-Lisbonne et al. (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MYB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 85% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- TSB, 24 h, 35°C 500 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- BHI, 48 h, 35°C 500 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSB, 24 h, 35°C 300 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSB, 10 d, 4°C 300 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ BHI, 48 h, 35°C 500 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 320 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ BHI, 48 h, 35°C 250 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, 16 h, 37°C 350 Lens-Lisbonne et al. (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 390 Bastide et al. (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TSB, 24 h, 35°C 400 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MYB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 70% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NB, 16 h, 37°C 200 Lens-Lisbonne et al. (1987)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 6–8 h 20°C, spore germ. inh. 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 7–14 d, 28°C 1000 Soliman <strong>and</strong> Badeaa (2002)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 100 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi PDA, 7–14 d, 28°C 1000 Soliman <strong>and</strong> Badeaa (2002)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 6–8 h 20°C, spore germ. inh. 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
continued
388 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.14 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters MIC (µg/mL) Ref.<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 7–14 d, 28°C 1000 Soliman <strong>and</strong> Badeaa (2002)<br />
Botrytis cinera Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 7 d, 24°C 25% inh. 1000 Bouchra et al. (2003)<br />
Colletotrichum musae Fungi SMKY, EtOH, 7 d, 28°C 300 Ranasinghe et al. (2002)<br />
Epidermophyton fl occosum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C 300–625 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
Fusarium moniliforme Fungi PDA, 7–14 d, 28°C 1000 Soliman <strong>and</strong> Badeaa (2002)<br />
Fusarium proliferatum Fungi SMKY, EtOH, 7 d, 28°C 500 Ranasinghe et al. (2002)<br />
Geotrichum citri-aurantii Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 7 d, 24°C 30% inh. 1000 Bouchra et al. (2003)<br />
Lasiodiplodia theobromae Fungi SMKY, EtOH, 7 d, 28°C 350 Ranasinghe et al. (2002)<br />
Mucor hiemalis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor racemosus f. racemosus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 100 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 100 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 7 d, 24°C 32% inh. 1000 Bouchra et al. (2003)<br />
Phytophthora citrophthora Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 7 d, 24°C 38% inh. 1000 Bouchra et al. (2003)<br />
Rhizopus 66-81-2 Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus arrhizus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus chinensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus circinans Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus japonicus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus kazanensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus oryzae Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus pymacus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Rhizopus stolonifer Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus tritici Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 389<br />
TABLE 12.15<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Ceylon Cinnamon Bark Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters Quantity (µg) Activity Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- BlA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 12.5 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Haemophilus infl uenzae Bac- MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 3.13 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Neisseria sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd ++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Bacillus subtilis var. aterrimus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd ++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheriae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Mycobacterium avium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd + Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd ++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 6.25 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6.35, sd + Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Streptococcus pneumoniae Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 1.56–3.13 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 6.25 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 +++ Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 + Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 ++ Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Aspergillus terreus Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 NG Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Fusarium graminearum Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 NG Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Fusarium moniliforme Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 NG Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Penicillium citrinum Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 NG Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Penicillium viridicatum Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 NG Singh et al. (2007)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)
390 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.16<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Ceylon Cinnamon Leaf Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters<br />
Disk Size (mm),<br />
Quantity (µg)<br />
Inhibition Zone<br />
(mm) Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TYA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 17 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 2000 25 Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 2000 90 Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 2000 17 Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Bacillus cereus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 2000 32 Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 2000 90 Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TYA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 12 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 20 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TYA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 18 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 2000 48 Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Alternaria porri Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 50 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, 48 h, 28°C 5, 5000 30 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2006)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cicer Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 35 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast TYA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 14 Morris et al. (1979)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 391<br />
TABLE 12.17<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Ceylon Cinnamon Leaf Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters MIC (µg/mL) Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TYB, 18–24 h, 37°C 1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli O157:H7 Bac- BHI, 48 h, 35°C 1000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- BHI, 48 h, 35°C 1000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TYB, 18–24 h, 37°C 500 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ BHI, 48 h, 35°C 2000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TYB, 18–24 h, 37°C 500 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ BHI, 48 h, 35°C 500 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 6–8 h 20°C, spore germ. inh. 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi YES broth, 10 d 95% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi YES broth, 10 d 94% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 6–8 h 20°C, spore germ. inh. 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Colletotrichum musae Fungi SMKY, EtOH, 7 d, 28°C 500 Ranasinghe et al. (2002)<br />
Fusarium culmorum Fungi YES broth, 10 d 73% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Fusarium proliferatum Fungi SMKY, EtOH, 7 d, 28°C 500 Ranasinghe et al. (2002)<br />
Lasiodiplodia theobromae Fungi SMKY, EtOH, 7 d, 28°C 600 Ranasinghe et al. (2002)<br />
Mucor hiemalis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor racemosus f. racemosus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus 66-81-2 Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus arrhizus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus chinensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 100 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus circinans Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus japonicus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus kazanensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus oryzae Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus pymacus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus stolonifer Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus tritici Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast TYB, 18–24 h, 37°C 500 Morris et al. (1979)
392 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.18<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Ceylon Cinnamon Leaf Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Test Parameters Quantity (µg) Activity Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Neisseria sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheriae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 NG Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi Bread, 14 d, 25°C 30,000 +++ Suhr <strong>and</strong> Nielsen (2003)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 NG Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 NG Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 NG Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 + Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Aspergillus terreus Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 + Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Endomyces fi lbuliger Fungi Bread, 14 d, 25°C 30,000 +++ Suhr <strong>and</strong> Nielsen (2003)<br />
Eurotium amstelodami Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 NG Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium herbarum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 NG Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium repens Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 NG Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium repens Fungi Bread, 14 d, 25°C 30,000 +++ Suhr <strong>and</strong> Nielsen (2003)<br />
Eurotium rubrum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 NG Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Fusarium graminearum Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 NG Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Fusarium moniliforme Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 NG Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Penicillium citrinum Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 NG Singh et al. (2007)<br />
Penicillium corylophilum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 NG Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Penicillium corylophilum Fungi Bread, 14 d, 25°C 30,000 +++ Suhr <strong>and</strong> Nielsen (2003)<br />
Penicillium roqueforti Fungi Bread, 14 d, 25°C 30,000 +++ Suhr <strong>and</strong> Nielsen (2003)<br />
Penicillium viridicatum Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 NG Singh et al. (2007)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 393<br />
TABLE 12.19<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Citronella Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Inhibition Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 a Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 0 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Brucella abortus Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 40 a Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 a Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 0–1 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 10.5 a Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited 20,000 0 Lemos et al. (1992)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 0 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Agar, 24 h, 37°C 6, 6000 7 Jirovetz et al. (2006)<br />
Klebsiella pneumonia Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Klebsiella pneumonia subsp. oceanae Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- Agar, 24 h, 37°C 6, 6000 0 Jirovetz et al. (2006)<br />
Neisseria perfl ava Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 a Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus OX19 Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 a Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 0 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- Agar, 24 h, 37°C 6, 6000 10 Jirovetz et al. (2006)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 a Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 0 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 0 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Agar, 24 h, 37°C 6, 6000 0 Jirovetz et al. (2006)<br />
Pseudomonas fl uorescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 0–1 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Pseudomonas mangiferae indicae Bac- NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 11 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 12.8 a Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 6–10 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
continued
394 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.19 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Inhibition Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Salmonella paratyphi Bac- NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 14 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Salmonella paratyphi B Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 1 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Salmonella sp. Bac- Agar, 24 h, 37°C 6, 6000 0 Jirovetz et al. (2006)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 18 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 21 a Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 0 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Vibrio albicans Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 6–10 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Vibrio cholera Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 6–10 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Vibrio cholera Bac- NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 0 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Bacillus anthracis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 1 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Bacillus cereus Bac+ Cited 20,000 20 Lemos et al. (1992)<br />
Bacillus mesentericus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 3 a Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus mycoides Bac+ NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 12 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Bacillus pumilus Bac+ NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 12 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 1 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 8 a Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 12 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 15.5 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Clostridium perfringens Bac+ Cited 6, 15,000 39.5 a Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheria Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 6–10 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Enterococcus faecalis Bac+ Agar, 24 h, 37°C 6, 6000 10 Jirovetz et al. (2006)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 1 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 16 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Sarcina alba Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 6–10 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Sarcina beige Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 16–23 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Sarcina citrea Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 0 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 a Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 395<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 0 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Sarcina rosa Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 11–15 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Sporococcus sarc. Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 26–33 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Staphylococcus albus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 6–10 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 a Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited 20,000 0 a Lemos et al. (1992)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Agar, 24 h, 37°C 6, 6000 10 Jirovetz et al. (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 11 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 12 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 12.6 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ Cited 20,000 12 a Lemos et al. (1992)<br />
Streptococcus haemolyticus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 6–10 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Streptococcus viridians Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 1 a Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Streptomyces venezuelae Bac+ SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Alternaria solani Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 15 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDA, 7–10 d, 28°C 5, 5000 8 Saikia et al. (2001)<br />
Helminthosporium sativum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Microsporon gypseum Fungi SDA, 7–10 d, 28°C 5, 5000 34 Saikia et al. (2001)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 18 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Nigrospora panici Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 40 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 1 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 12 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Sporothrix schenkii Fungi SDA, 7–10 d, 28°C 5, 5000 12 Saikia et al. (2001)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 1 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Cited 20,000 17 Lemos et al. (1992)<br />
continued
396 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.19 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Inhibition Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 18 h, 30°C 6 (h), pure 17 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Agar, 24 h, 37°C 6, 6000 28 Jirovetz et al. (2006)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 7–10 d, 28°C 5, 5000 7 Saikia et al. (2001)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast Cited 20,000 0 Lemos et al. (1992)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus rhodobenhani Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
a<br />
Citronella oil obtained from Cymbopogon nardus (Ceylon-type).
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 397<br />
TABLE 12.20<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Citronella Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHB, 24 h, 36°C 2000–8000 Duarte et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Escherichia coli O157:H7 Bac- BHI, 48 h, 35°C >8000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C >500 a Koba et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas cepacia Bac- NA, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C >500 a Koba et al. (2004)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- BHI, 48 h, 35°C 4000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ BHI, 48 h, 35°C 4000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 1250 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ BHI, 48 h, 35°C 500 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 6400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus intermedius Bac+ NA, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C >500 a Koba et al. (2004)<br />
Aspergillus c<strong>and</strong>idus Fungi Cited >250 a Nakahara et al. (2003)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi Cited >250 a Nakahara et al. (2003)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 28 d, 21°C 4000–10,000 Thanaboripat et al. (2004)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi NA, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 200 a Koba et al. (2004)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDB, 7–10 d, 28°C 2500 Saikia et al. (2001)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 6400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Aspergillus oryzae Fungi Cited 250 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Aspergillus versicolor Fungi Cited >250 a Nakahara et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium amstelodami Fungi Cited >250 a Nakahara et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium chevalieri Fungi Cited >250 a Nakahara et al. (2003)<br />
continued
398 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.20 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Microsporon canis Fungi NA, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 200 a Koba et al. (2004)<br />
Microsporon gypseum Fungi NA, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 500 a Koba et al. (2004)<br />
Microsporon gypseum Fungi SDB, 7–10 d, 28°C 625 Saikia et al. (2001)<br />
Mucor racemosus Fungi Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 6400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium adametzii Fungi Cited >250 a Nakahara et al. (2003)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 12,500 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi Cited 250 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Penicillium citrinum Fungi Cited >250 a Nakahara et al. (2003)<br />
Penicillium grise<strong>of</strong>ulvum Fungi Cited >250 a Nakahara et al. (2003)<br />
Penicillium islansicum Fungi Cited >250 a Nakahara et al. (2003)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 12,500 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Sporothrix schenkii Fungi SDB, 7–10 d, 28°C 1250 Saikia et al. (2001)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi NA, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 150 a Koba et al. (2004)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C >500 a Koba et al. (2004)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDB, 7–10 d, 28°C 1250 Saikia et al. (2001)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 6400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans Yeast NA, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 500 a Koba et al. (2004)<br />
Malassezia pachydermis Yeast NA, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 150 a Koba et al. (2004)<br />
a<br />
Citronella oil obtained from Cymbopogon nardus (Ceylon-type).
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 399<br />
TABLE 12.21<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Citronella Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Activity Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Neisseria sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ a Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Bacillus subtilis var. aterrimus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd + a Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheriae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Mycobacterium avium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd NG a Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ a Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ a Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Aspergillus c<strong>and</strong>idus Fungi PDA, 3–5 d, 27°C 250 mg/L air NG b Nakahara et al. (2003)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 3–5 d, 27°C 250 mg/L air NG b Nakahara et al. (2003)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 10 d, 25°C 50 ++ Sarbhoy et al. (1978)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi PDA, 10 d, 25°C 50 NG Sarbhoy et al. (1978)<br />
Aspergillus sulphureus Fungi PDA, 10 d, 25°C 50 NG Sarbhoy et al. (1978)<br />
Aspergillus versicolor Fungi PDA, 3–5 d, 27°C 250 mg/L air NG b Nakahara et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium amstelodami Fungi PDA, 3–5 d, 27°C 250 mg/L air NG b Nakahara et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium chevalieri Fungi PDA, 3–5 d, 27°C 250 mg/L air NG b Nakahara et al. (2003)<br />
Mucor fragilis Fungi PDA, 10 d, 25°C 50 NG Sarbhoy et al. (1978)<br />
Penicillium adametzii Fungi PDA, 3–5 d, 27°C 250 mg/L air NG b Nakahara et al. (2003)<br />
Penicillium citrinum Fungi PDA, 3–5 d, 27°C 250 mg/L air NG b Nakahara et al. (2003)<br />
Penicillium grise<strong>of</strong>ulvum Fungi PDA, 3–5 d, 27°C 250 mg/L air NG b Nakahara et al. (2003)<br />
Penicillium islansicum Fungi PDA, 3–5 d, 27°C 250 mg/L air NG b Nakahara et al. (2003)<br />
Rhizopus stolonifer Fungi PDA, 10 d, 25°C 50 ++ Sarbhoy et al. (1978)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
a<br />
Formosan citronella oil.<br />
b<br />
Citronella oil obtained from Cymbopogon nardus (Ceylon-type).
400 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.22<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Clary Sage Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Inhibition Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHA, 24 h, 37°C 6, 10,000 14 Yousefzadi et al. (2007)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- MHA, 24 h, 37°C 6, 10,000 10 Yousefzadi et al. (2007)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHA, 24 h, 37°C 6, 10,000 0 Yousefzadi et al. (2007)<br />
Bacillus pumilus Bac+ MHA, 24 h, 37°C 6, 10,000 16 Yousefzadi et al. (2007)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ MHA, 24 h, 37°C 6, 10,000 17 Yousefzadi et al. (2007)<br />
Enterococcus faecalis Bac+ MHA, 24 h, 37°C 6, 10,000 9 Yousefzadi et al. (2007)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9–15 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHA, 24 h, 37°C 6, 10,000 15 Yousefzadi et al. (2007)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ MHA, 24 h, 37°C 6, 10,000 15 Yousefzadi et al. (2007)<br />
Alternaria porri Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 0 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi MHA, 48 h, 30°C 6, 10,000 0 Yousefzadi et al. (2007)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, 48 h, 28°C 5, 5000 0 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2006)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cicer Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 9 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast MHA, 48 h, 30°C 6, 10,000 0 Yousefzadi et al. (2007)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast MHA, 48 h, 30°C 6, 10,000 0 Yousefzadi et al. (2007)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 401<br />
TABLE 12.23<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Clary Sage Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Acinetobacter baumannii Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Aeromonas sobria Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Erwinia carotovora Bac- NA, 48 h, 22°C >2000 Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 48 h, 37°C >2000 Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 15,000 Yousefzadi et al. (2007)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited 1500–2000 Peana et al. (1999)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C >15,000 Yousefzadi et al. (2007)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- NA, 48 h, 37°C >2000 Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 48 h, 37°C >2000 Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Bacillus cereus Bac+ NA, 48 h, 37°C 250 Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Bacillus circulans Bac+ NA, 48 h, 37°C 100 Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ NA, 48 h, 37°C 250 Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Bacillus pumilus Bac+ MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 7500 Yousefzadi et al. (2007)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 7500 Yousefzadi et al. (2007)<br />
Bacillus subtilis var. aterrimus Bac+ NA, 48 h, 37°C 100 Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Enterococcus faecalis Bac+ MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C >15,000 Yousefzadi et al. (2007)<br />
Enterococcus faecalis Bac+ MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 48 h, 37°C >2000 Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited 1500–2000 Peana et al. (1999)<br />
continued
402 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.23 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 7500 Yousefzadi et al. (2007)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ Cited 1500–2000 Peana et al. (1999)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 7500 Yousefzadi et al. (2007)<br />
Alternaria alternata Fungi SDA, 6–8 h, 20°C 500, 62% inh. Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi SDA, 6–8 h, 20°C 500, 52% inh. Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi YES broth, 10 d - 92% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi YES broth, 10 d - >10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Fusarium culmorum Fungi YES broth, 10 d - 69% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. dianthi Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 4 d, 23°C 72% inh. 2000 Pitarokili et al. (2002)<br />
Geotrichum c<strong>and</strong>idum Fungi NA, 5 d, 22°C >2000 Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Gibberella fugikuroi Fungi NA, 5 d, 22°C >2000 Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Helminthosporium truicicum Fungi NA, 5 d, 22°C >2000 Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi SDA, 7 d, 30°C 400, 56% inh. Dikshit <strong>and</strong> Husain (1984)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi SDA, 6–8 h, 20°C 500, 56% inh. Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Penicillium italicum Fungi SDA, 6–8 h, 20°C 500, 59% inh. Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Phoma betae Fungi NA, 5 d, 22°C >2000 Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Pityrosporum ovale Fungi NA, 5 d, 22°C >2000 Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Sclerotina cepivorum Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 4 d, 23°C 94% inh. 1000 Pitarokili et al. (2002)<br />
Sclerotina sclerotiorum Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 4 d, 23°C 1000 Pitarokili et al. (2002)<br />
Trichophyton equinum Fungi SDA, 7 d, 30°C 400, 30% inh. Dikshit <strong>and</strong> Husain (1984)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi SDA, 6–8 h, 20°C 500, 40% inh. Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi SDA, 7 d, 30°C 400, 43% inh. Dikshit <strong>and</strong> Husain (1984)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi SDA, 6–8 h, 20°C 500, 43% inh. Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 48 h, 37°C >2000 Maruzzella (1963)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Cited 1500–2000 Peana et al. (1999)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 403<br />
TABLE 12.24<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Clary Sage Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Activity Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 48 h, 37°C 500 μL in cover +++ Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- NA, 48 h, 37°C 500 μL in cover NG Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Bacillus subtilis var. aterrimus Bac+ NA, 48 h, 37°C 500 μL in cover + Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Bacillus subtilis var. aterrimus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Mycobacterium avium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd NG Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 48 h, 37°C 500 μL in cover NG Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Botrytis cinera Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Colletotrichum gleosporoides Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Geotrichum c<strong>and</strong>idum Fungi NA, 5 d, 22°C 500 μL in cover +++ Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Gibberella fugikuroi Fungi NA, 5 d, 22°C 500 μL in cover +++ Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Helminthosporium truicicum Fungi NA, 5 d, 22°C 500 μL in cover +++ Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Phoma betae Fungi NA, 5 d, 22°C 500 μL in cover +++ Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Pityrosporum ovale Fungi NA, 5 d, 22°C 500 μL in cover +++ Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Pythium ultimum Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Rhizoctonia solani Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 48 h, 37°C 500 μL in cover +++ Maruzzella (1963)<br />
Annotation: Clary sage absolute tested (Maruzzella, 1963).
404 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.25<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Clove Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition Zone<br />
(mm) Ref.<br />
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 16 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Aeromonas hydrophila Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 16.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Alcaligenes faecalis Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 1 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Beneckea natriegens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 13 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- TSA, 24 h, 42°C 4 (h), 25,000 9 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 22.5 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Citrobacter freundii Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Citrobacter sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 11, sd 0 Prasad et al. (1986)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 11, sd 16 Prasad et al. (1986)<br />
Erwinia carotovora Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 14.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 11, sd 0 Prasad et al. (1986)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited 15, 2500 6 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 16 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 9.7 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 19 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 13.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 16.5 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 38 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Flavobacterium suaveolens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 15 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 3 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Moraxella sp. Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Neisseria perfl ava Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 4 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 405<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 0 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited 15, 2500 1 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 9 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 11 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 23 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Pseudomonas sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 11, sd 0 Prasad et al. (1986)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 11.1 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 14.3 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Salmonella pullorum Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 16 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Salmonella saintpaul Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 11, sd 22 Prasad et al. (1986)<br />
Salmonella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 7 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Salmonella sp. B Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 11, sd 26 Prasad et al. (1986)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 19.5 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Salmonella weltevreden Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 11, sd 22 Prasad et al. (1986)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 25 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Serratia sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 2 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Shigella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 6 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus anthracis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 11, sd 25 Prasad et al. (1986)<br />
Bacillus mesentericus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus saccharolyticus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 11, sd 20 Prasad et al. (1986)<br />
Bacillus sp. Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 9 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Bacillus stearothermophilus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 11, sd 20 Prasad et al. (1986)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
continued
406 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.25 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition Zone<br />
(mm) Ref.<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 16 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 12.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 11, sd 22 Prasad et al. (1986)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 22.5 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Bacillus thurengiensis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 11, sd 19 Prasad et al. (1986)<br />
Brevibacterium linens Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 14 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Brochotrix thermosphacta Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 5.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Clostridium perfringens Bac+ Cited 6, 15,000 20.5 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Clostridium sporogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 15 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Lactobacillus casei Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 11, sd 22 Prasad et al. (1986)<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 11 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 11, sd 50 Prasad et al. (1986)<br />
Leuconostoc cremoris Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 13 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 8.4 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 20 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Micrococcus glutamicus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 11, sd 44 Prasad et al. (1986)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 20 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 11, sd 32 Prasad et al. (1986)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 5 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 8 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 11 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 14 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 14.3 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 407<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 21 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 11, sd 30 Prasad et al. (1986)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 10 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Staphylococcus sp. Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 11, sd 26 Prasad et al. (1986)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Streptococcus viridans Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 1 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Streptomyces venezuelae Bac+ SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 9 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Alternaria porri Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 40.5 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Alternaria solani Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 9 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 10 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 10 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, 48 h, 28°C 5, 5000 28 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 34 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cicer Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 12 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Helminthosporium sativum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 20 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Nigrospora panici Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 8 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 47 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 9 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 20 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Brettanomyces anomalus Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 18 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 19 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 18 h, 30°C 6 (h), pure 20 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 28.3 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 40 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida lipolytica Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 27 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 8 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
continued
408 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.25 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition Zone<br />
(mm) Ref.<br />
Cryptococcus rhodobenhani Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 13 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Debaryomyces hansenii Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 26 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Geotrichum c<strong>and</strong>idum Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 19 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Hansenula anomala Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 19 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kloeckera apiculata Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 21 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kluyveromyces fragilis Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 14 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Lodderomyces elongisporus Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 15 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Metchnikowia pulcherrima Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 29 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Pichia membranaefaciens Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 13 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Rhodotorula rubra Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 18 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 19 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 50 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Schizosaccharomyces pombe Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 34 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Torula glabrata Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 15 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Torula utilis Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 39 Hili et al. (1997)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 409<br />
TABLE 12.26<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Clove Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Acinetobacter baumannii Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 2500 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Brucella abortus Bac- Cited 250 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1952)<br />
Brucella melitensis Bac- Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1952)<br />
Brucella suis Bac- Cited 15 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1952)<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- TSB, 24 h, 42°C 500 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- LA, 18 h, 37°C 500–1000 Remmal et al. (1993)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSB, 24 h, 35°C 400 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1952)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 74% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C 1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 1250 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 2500 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Escherichia coli O157:H7 Bac- BHI, 48 h, 35°C 1000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- Cited >500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1952)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 2500 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- Cited 250 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1952)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited >500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1952)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 75% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas fl uorescens Bac- NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 1500 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- TSB, 24 h, 35°C 400 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Salmonella haddar Bac- LA, 18 h, 37°C 500 Remmal et al. (1993)<br />
Salmonella paratyphi A Bac- Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1952)<br />
Salmonella paratyphi B Bac- Cited >500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1952)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- BHI, 48 h, 35°C 1000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 1500 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
continued
410 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.26 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 2500 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Shigella dysenteriae I Bac- Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1952)<br />
Shigella dysenteriae II Bac- Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1952)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ LA, 18 h, 37°C 500–1000 Remmal et al. (1993)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 500 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C 500 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Enterococcus faecalis Bac+ MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 5000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSB, 10 d, 4°C 200 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSB, 24 h, 35°C 300 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ BHI, 48 h, 35°C 2000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Micrococcus sp. Bac+ NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 250 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 500 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 1600 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Mycobacterium tuberculosis Bac+ Cited 125 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1952)<br />
Sarcina sp. Bac+ NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 500 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TSB, 24 h, 35°C 400 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1952)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C 500 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ BHI, 48 h, 35°C 500 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 83% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 750 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ LA, 18 h, 37°C 1000 Remmal et al. (1993)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 2500 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 6400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus citreus Bac+ Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1952)<br />
Achorion gypseum Fungi Cited, 15 d 125 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1952)<br />
Alternaria alternata Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 156–312 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Alternaria citri Fungi PDA, 8 d, 22°C 500 Arras <strong>and</strong> Usai (2001)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 8 h, 20°C, spore germ. inh. 50–100 Thompson (1986)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 411<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 100 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 2500 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus var. columnaris Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 1250 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 5000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 2500 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi YES broth, 10 d 95% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi YES broth, 10 d 94% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus oryzae Fungi Cited 250 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 8 h, 20°C, spore germ. inh. 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 100 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Botrytis cinera Fungi PDA, 8 d, 22°C 500 Arras <strong>and</strong> Usai (2001)<br />
Cladosporium cladosporoides Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 78–156 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Colletotrichum musae Fungi SMKY, EtOH, 7 d, 28°C 400 Ranasinghe et al. (2002)<br />
Epidermophyton fl occosum Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 125 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Epidermophyton fl occosum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C 10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi Cited 250 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 1600 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi PDA, 8 d, 22°C 500 Arras <strong>and</strong> Usai (2001)<br />
Penicillium frequentans Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 1250 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Penicillium italicum Fungi PDA, 8 d, 22°C 500 Arras <strong>and</strong> Usai (2001)<br />
continued
412 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.26 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Penicillium lanosum Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 5000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Rhizopus 66-81-2 Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 100 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus arrhizus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 100 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus chinensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 100 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus circinans Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 100 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus japonicus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 100 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus kazanensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 100 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus oryzae Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 100 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus pymacus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 100 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C >10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Rhizopus stolonifer Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 100 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus tritici Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 100 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Scopulariopsis brevicaulis Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Trichophyton asteroides Fungi Cited, 15 d 125 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1952)<br />
Trichophyton interdigitale Fungi Cited, 15 d 125 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1952)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 250–500 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 413<br />
TABLE 12.27<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Clove Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism<br />
MO<br />
Class Conditions Activity Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Neisseria sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C sd ++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella<br />
(1960)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Bacillus subtilis var.<br />
aterrimus<br />
Corynebacterium<br />
diphtheriae<br />
Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella<br />
(1960)<br />
Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Mycobacterium avium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd + Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella<br />
(1960)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella<br />
(1960)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella<br />
(1960)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Alternaria alternata Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 312–625 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 NG Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 625–1250 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 625–1250 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 NG Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 625–1250 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Cladosporium<br />
Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 78–156 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
cladosporoides<br />
Eurotium amstelodami Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 NG Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium herbarum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 NG Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium repens Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 NG Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium rubrum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 NG Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 312 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Microsporum canis Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 312–1250 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 156–312 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 625 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Penicillium corylophilum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 NG Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Penicillium frequentans Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air >10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Penicillium lanosum Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air >10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 125 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Scopulariopsis<br />
Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 312–1250 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
brevicaulis<br />
Trichophyton<br />
Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 78–156 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
mentagrophytes<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)
414 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.28<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Cori<strong>and</strong>er Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition<br />
Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Aeromonas hydrophila Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Agrobacterium tumefaciens Bac- WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 435 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Alcaligenes faecalis Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Beneckea natriegens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Burkholderia gladioli pv. agaricicola Bac- WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 3480 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Citrobacter freundii Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- MHA, 48 h, 27°C 6, 15,000 12 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Erwinia carotovora Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica Bac- WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 435 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora Bac- WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 435 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 10 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7.6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 13 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 10.5 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHA, 48 h, 27°C 6, 15,000 20 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 870 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Flavobacterium suaveolens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 13 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Moraxella sp. Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Neisseria perfl ava Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 0 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 415<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 6 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 9 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHA, 48 h, 27°C 6, 15,000 12 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Pseudomonas agarici Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 3480 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas chichorii Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 6960 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas corrugate Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 3480 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas reactans Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA >6960 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas syringae pv. apata Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 3480 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas syringae pv. atr<strong>of</strong>aciens Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 6960 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas syringae pv. glycinea Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 870 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA >6960 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 870 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 2610 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 2610 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 3480 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 3480 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas tolaasii Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA >6960 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas viridifl ava Bac- KBA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA >6960 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Salmonella pullorum Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 11 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- MHA, 48 h, 27°C 6, 15,000 7 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris Bac- WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 217 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaesoli<br />
var. fuscans<br />
Bac- WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 217 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaesoli<br />
Bac- WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 217 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
var. phaesoli<br />
Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria Bac- WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 217 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
continued
416 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.28 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition<br />
Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 435 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Bacillus mesentericus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 7.3 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 11 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 27 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Brevibacterium linens Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Brochotrix thermosphacta Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 14 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp.<br />
michiganensis<br />
Bac+ WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 374 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp.<br />
Bac+ WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 435 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
sepedonicus<br />
Clostridium sporogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Curtobacterium fl accunfaciens pv. betae Bac+ WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 632 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Curtobacterium fl accunfaciens pv.<br />
fl accunfaciens<br />
Bac+ WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 435 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Leuconostoc cremoris Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 19 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Rhodococcus fascians Bac+ WA, 48 h, 25°C 6, 8000 MIA 435 Cantore et al. (2004)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 12 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 14 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 11.3 Janssen et al. (1986)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 417<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHA, 48 h, 27°C 6, 15,000 18 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ MHA, 48 h, 27°C 6, 15,000 10 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Streptomyces venezuelae Bac+ SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 11 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Alternaria porri Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 12 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Alternaria solani Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 18 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Alternaria sp. Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 9.5 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Aspergillus c<strong>and</strong>idus Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 0 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 0 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 12 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 21 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus nidulans Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 0 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, 48 h, 28°C 5, 5000 0 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi MHA, 48 h, 27°C 6, 15,000 0 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 16 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 21 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 60 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Cladosporium herbarum Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 21.5 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Cunninghamella echinulata Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 20 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 0 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cicer Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 11.5 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Helminthosporium sacchari Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 13 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Helminthosporium sativum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 11 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 8 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 12 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 25 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 21 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Nigrospora panici Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 28 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°°C 6 (h), pure 60 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 12 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 14 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 11 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 13 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
continued
418 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.28 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition<br />
Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 19 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 10 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Trichothecium roseum Fungi PDA, 18 h, 37°C 6, sd 8 Sharma <strong>and</strong> Singh (1979)<br />
Brettanomyces anomalus Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast MHA, 48 h, 27°C 6, 15,000 10 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 11 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 18 h, 30°C 6 (h), pure 28 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 29 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida lipolytica Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 9 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus rhodobenhani Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 20 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Debaryomyces hansenii Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Geotrichum c<strong>and</strong>idum Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Hansenula anomala Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 12 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kloeckera apiculata Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 8 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kluyveromyces fragilis Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Lodderomyces elongisporus Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Metchnikowia pulcherrima Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Pichia membranaefaciens Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Rhodotorula rubra Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 32 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Schizosaccharomyces pombe Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 33 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Torula glabrata Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 7 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Torula utilis Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 37 Hili et al. (1997)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 419<br />
TABLE 12.29<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Cori<strong>and</strong>er Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism<br />
MO<br />
Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- MHB, 24 h, 37°C 4315 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C >500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C >1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHB, 24 h, 37°C 2150 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Escherichia coli O157:H7 Bac- BHI, 48 h, 35°C 2000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 74% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHB, 24 h, 37°C 4350 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 12,500 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- BHI, 48 h, 35°C 2000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- MHB, 24 h, 37°C 17,260 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 800 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C 500 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ BHI, 48 h, 35°C >8000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 44% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C 1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHB, 24 h, 37°C 1070 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ BHI, 48 h, 35°C 2000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 3120 Bastide et al. (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus<br />
Bac+ MHB, 24 h, 37°C 8630 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
epidermidis<br />
Aspergillus flavus Fungi PDA, 8 h, 20°C, spore germ. 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
inh.<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi CDA, cited 3000 Dubey et al. (1990)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi MHB, 24 h, 37°C >20,000 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 8 h, 20°C, spore germ. 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
inh.<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Epidermophyton<br />
Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C 1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor racemosus f. Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
racemosus<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 800 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 800 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Rhizopus 66-81-2 Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus arrhizus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus chinensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus circinans Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
continued
420 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.29 (continued)<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Cori<strong>and</strong>er Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism<br />
MO<br />
Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Rhizopus japonicus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus kazanensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus oryzae Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus pymacus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 1600 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Rhizopus stolonifer Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus tritici Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Trichophyton<br />
Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C 300,625 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
mentagrophytes<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C 1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast MHB, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 2500 Hammer et al. (1998)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast MHB, 24 h, 37°C 4310 Ertürk et al. (2006)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 68% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Schizosaccharomyces Yeast MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 18% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
pombe<br />
Torula utilis Yeast MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 87% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
TABLE 12.30<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Cori<strong>and</strong>er Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Activity Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- BLA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 250 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Haemophilus infl uenzae Bac- MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 12.5 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Neisseria sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C sd ++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Bacillus subtilis var. aterrimus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheriae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Mycobacterium avium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd NG Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 50 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Streptococcus pneumoniae Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 25 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 25 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 421<br />
TABLE 12.31<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Dwarf Pine Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism<br />
MO<br />
Class<br />
Conditions<br />
Inhibition<br />
Zone<br />
(mm)<br />
Ref.<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 11 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Neisseria perfl ava Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 8.3 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus mesentericus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 16.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 8.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Streptomyces venezuelae Bac+ SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Alternaria solani Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Helminthosporium<br />
Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
sativum<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Nigrospora panici Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 32.3 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus<br />
Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
ne<strong>of</strong>ormans<br />
Cryptococcus<br />
Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
rhodobenhani<br />
Saccharomyces<br />
cerevisiae<br />
Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
TABLE 12.32<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Dwarf Pine Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Epidermophyton fl occosum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C >1250 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C >1250 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C >1250 Janssen et al. (1988)
422 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.33<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Dwarf Pine Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Activity Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 +++ Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Neisseria sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 +++ Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheriae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 ++ Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 423<br />
TABLE 12.34<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition<br />
Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Aeromonas hydrophila Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Alcaligenes faecalis Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Beneckea natriegens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- TSA, 24 h, 42°C 4 (h), 25,000 8.3 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Citrobacter freundii Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- MHA, 24 h, 30°C 6, 15,000 7 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Erwinia carotovora Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHA, 24 h, 30°C 6, 15,000 6 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 8 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 10.3 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited 15, 2500 16 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 20 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 5 (h), -30,000 22 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Flavobacterium suaveolens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 10 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 1 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Moraxella sp. Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Neisseria perfl ava Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 10 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 17 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
continued
424 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.34 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition<br />
Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHA, 24 h, 30°C 6, 15,000 6 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 13 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 9.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 7.5 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Salmonella pullorum Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Salmonella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 10 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 5.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Serratia sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 2 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Shigella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 13 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus mesentericus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 10 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus sp. Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 4 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 8.3 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 23.5 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 34 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Brevibacterium linens Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 4.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Brochotrix thermosphacta Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Clostridium sporogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Leuconostoc cremoris Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6–20 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 5.4 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 29 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 425<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 5 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 8 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 8.5 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHA, 24 h, 37°C 6, 15,000 16 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 30 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 15 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 5 (h), -30,000 15 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Streptococcus viridans Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Streptomyces venezuelae Bac+ SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 13 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Alternaria solani Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 10 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 13 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 10 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Helminthosporium sativum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 9 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 9 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 10 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Nigrospora panici Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 10 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 13 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 0 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 11.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 18 h, 30°C 6 (h), pure 31 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 8 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus rhodobenhani Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast NA, 24 h, 20°C 5 (h), -30,000 16–21 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 8 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)
426 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.35<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- TSB, 24 h, 42°C >10,000 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Citrobacter freundii Bac- ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 10,000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 20,000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C >1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSB, 24 h, 35°C >10,000 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C >40,000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGB, 18 h, 37°C 2800 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 6400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 5000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Proteus mirabilis Bac- ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 20,000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C >40,000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 12,500 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Salmonella choleraesuis Bac- ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 20,000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- TSB, 24 h, 35°C >10,000 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Shigella fl exneri Bac- ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 2500 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 10,000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriae Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 20,000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C >1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Enterococcus durans Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 20,000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Enterococcus faecalis Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 20,000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Enterococcus faecium Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 20,000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 2500 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSB, 24 h, 35°C 750 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C >1000 Morris et al. (1979)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 427<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TSB, 24 h, 35°C 1000 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 20,000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 6400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ TGB, 18 h, 37°C 2800 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 5000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Staphylococcus saprophyticus Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 5000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Staphylococcus xylosus Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 5000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Alternaria alternata Fungi PDA, 7 d, 28°C 0% inh. 500 Feng <strong>and</strong> Zheng (2007)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi YES broth, 10 d - 87% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi YES broth, 10 d - 61% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus oryzae Fungi Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Botrytis cinera Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 7 d, 24°C 2% inh. 1000 Bouchra et al. (2003)<br />
Epidermophyton fl occosum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C 625–1250 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
Fusarium culmorum Fungi YES broth, 10 d - 78% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Geotrichum citri-aurantii Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 7 d, 24°C 0% inh. 1000 Bouchra et al. (2003)<br />
Mucor racemosus Fungi Cited >500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 12,500 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 25,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 7 d, 24°C 2% inh. 1000 Bouchra et al. (2003)<br />
Phytophthora citrophthora Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 7 d, 24°C 38% inh. 1000 Bouchra et al. (2003)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 6400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C >1250 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C 625–1250 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C 1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 1600 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast YPB, 24 h, 20°C 700 Schelz et al. (2006)
428 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.36<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Activity Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Neisseria sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Bacillus subtilis var. aterrimus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheriae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Mycobacterium avium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd NG Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd ++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Botrytis cinera Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Colletotrichum gleosporoides Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Pythium ultimum Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Rhizoctonia solani Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 429<br />
TABLE 12.37<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Juniper Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition Zone<br />
(mm) Ref.<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- MHA, 24 h, 30°C 6, 15,000 8 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 0 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 5 (h), -30,000 0 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 1 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHA, 24 h, 30°C 6, 15,000 11 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Neisseria perfl ava Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 10 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHA, 24 h, 30°C 6, 15,000 6 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 8 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus mesentericus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 7.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 9 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHA, 24 h, 37°C 6, 15,000 17 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 5 (h), -30,000 0 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Streptomyces venezuelae Bac+ SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Alternaria porri Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 11 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Alternaria solani Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi SDA, 72 h, 26°C 8, 25,000 0 Shin (2003)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 13 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDA, 72 h, 26°C 8, 25,000 0 Shin (2003)<br />
continued
430 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.37 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition Zone<br />
(mm) Ref.<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, 48 h, 28°C 5, 5000 5 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Botrytis cinera Fungi PDA, few days, 24°C 12.7, sd 0 Angioni et al. (2003)<br />
Cercospora beticola Fungi PDA, few days, 24°C 12.7, sd 0 Angioni et al. (2003)<br />
Fusarium graminearum Fungi PDA, few days, 24°C 12.7, sd 0 Angioni et al. (2003)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cicer Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 7.5 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum lycopersici Fungi PDA, few days, 24°C 12.7, sd 0 Angioni et al. (2003)<br />
Helminthosporium oryzae Fungi PDA, few days, 24°C 12.7, sd 0 Angioni et al. (2003)<br />
Helminthosporium sativum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Nigrospora panici Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Phytophthora capsici Fungi PDA, few days, 24°C 12.7, sd 0 Angioni et al. (2003)<br />
Pyricularia oryzae Fungi PDA, few days, 24°C 12.7, sd 0 Angioni et al. (2003)<br />
Pythium ultimum Fungi PDA, few days, 24°C 12.7, sd 0 Angioni et al. (2003)<br />
Rhizoctonia solani Fungi PDA, few days, 24°C 12.7, sd 0 Angioni et al. (2003)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Sclerotium rolfsii Fungi PDA, few days, 24°C 12.7, sd 0 Angioni et al. (2003)<br />
Septoria tritici Fungi PDA, few days, 24°C 12.7, sd 0 Angioni et al. (2003)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 15 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 11 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus rhodobenhani Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast NA, 24 h, 20°C 5 (h), -30,000 15–17 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 431<br />
TABLE 12.38<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Juniper Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C >900 Angioni et al. (2003)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, 24 h, 37°C >900 Cosentino et al. (2003)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGB, 18 h, 37°C 5400 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli O157:H7 Bac- NB, 24 h, 37°C >900 Cosentino et al. (2003)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C >900 Angioni et al. (2003)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, 24 h, 37°C >900 Cosentino et al. (2003)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- NB, 24 h, 37°C >900 Cosentino et al. (2003)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- NB, 24 h, 37°C >900 Cosentino et al. (2003)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 24 h, 37°C 2500 Rossi et al. (2007) a<br />
Bacillus cereus Bac+ NB, 24 h, 37°C >900 Cosentino et al. (2003)<br />
Enterococcus faecalis Bac+ NB, 24 h, 37°C >900 Cosentino et al. (2003)<br />
Enterococcus faecium VRE Bac+ HIB, Tween 80, 18 h, 37°C >20,000 Nelson (1997)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ NB, 24 h, 37°C >900 Cosentino et al. (2003)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C >900 Angioni et al. (2003)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, 24 h, 37°C >900 Cosentino et al. (2003)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus MRSA Bac+ HIB, Tween 80, 18 h, 37°C >20,000 Nelson (1997)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ TGB, 18 h, 37°C >11,300 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Alternaria alternate Fungi SDA, 6–8 h, 20°C 500, 13% inh. Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi MYB, 72 h, 26°C >25,000 Shin (2003)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi RPMI, 24 h, 37°C >900 Cosentino et al. (2003)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi RPMI, DMSO, 72 h, 37°C 20,000 Cavaleiro et al. (2006) a<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi SDA, 6–8 h, 20°C 500, 11% inh. Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi RPMI, DMSO, 72 h, 37°C 10,000 Cavaleiro et al. (2006) a<br />
continued
432 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.38 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi MYB, 72 h, 26°C >25,000 Shin (2003)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi RPMI, DMSO, 72 h, 37°C 10,000–20,000 Cavaleiro et al. (2006) a<br />
Epidermophyton fl occosum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C >1250 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
Epidermophyton fl occosum Fungi RPMI, DMSO, 72 h, 37°C 1250 Cavaleiro et al. (2006) a<br />
Microsporum canis Fungi RPMI, DMSO, 72 h, 37°C 1250 Cavaleiro et al. (2006) a<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi RPMI, DMSO, 72 h, 37°C 2500 Cavaleiro et al. (2006) a<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi SDA, 6–8 h, 20°C 500, 48% inh. Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Penicillium italicum Fungi SDA, 6–8 h, 20°C 500, 20% inh. Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C >1250 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi RPMI, DMSO, 72 h, 37°C 1250 Cavaleiro et al. (2006) a<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi SDA, 6–8 h, 20°C 500, 48% inh. Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C >1250 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi RPMI, DMSO, 72 h, 37°C 1250 Cavaleiro et al. (2006) a<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi SDA, 6–8 h, 20°C 500, 53% inh. Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NB, DMSO, 24 h, 30°C >900 Angioni et al. (2003)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast RPMI, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C 1250–10,000 Cavaleiro et al. (2006) a<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida glabrata Yeast RPMI, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C 5000 Cavaleiro et al. (2006) a<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast RPMI, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C 5000 Cavaleiro et al. (2006) a<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida parapsilosis Yeast RPMI, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C 5000 Cavaleiro et al. (2006) a<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast RPMI, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C 20,000 Cavaleiro et al. (2006) a<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast SB, 24 h, 37°C >900 Cosentino et al. (2003)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast YPB, 24 h, 20°C 2700 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
a<br />
Juniper communis ssp. alpine.
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 433<br />
TABLE 12.39<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Juniper Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Activity Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 ++ Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Neisseria sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheriae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Botrytis cinera Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Colletotrichum gleosporoides Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Pythium ultimum Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Rhizoctonia solani Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)
434 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.40<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Lavender Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition<br />
Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 10 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Aeromonas hydrophila Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Alcaligenes faecalis Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Beneckea natriegens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Citrobacter freundii Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterococcus faecalis Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5000 on agar 0 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Erwinia carotovora Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 0 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited, 24 h, 37°C —
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 435<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Shigella fl exneri Bac- Cited, 24 h, 37°C —
436 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.40 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition<br />
Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 12.3 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 14.3 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ MHA, cited 9, 20,000 14 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Streptococcus D Bac+ MHA, cited 9, 20,000 0–29 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 14 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Streptococcus micros Bac+ MHA, cited 9, 20,000 26 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Streptomyces venezuelae Bac+ SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 15 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Alternaria porri Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 13.3 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Alternaria solani Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi SDA, 72 h, 26°C 8, 25,000 4 Shin (2003)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDA, 72 h, 26°C 8, 25,000 2 Shin (2003)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 8 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, 48 h, 28°C 5, 5000 10 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 32 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cicer Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 9.8 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Helminthosporium sativum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 10 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 21 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Nigrospora panici Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 16 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 8 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 14 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 18 h, 30°C 6 (h), pure 11.5 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 14.3 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus rhodobenhani Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 437<br />
TABLE 12.41<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Lavender Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Bordetella bronchiseptica Bac- Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited 500 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C >1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSB, 24 h, 37°C >10,000 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Haemophilus infl uenza Bac- Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- Cited 1000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Moraxella glucidolytica Bac- Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Neisseria catarrhalis Bac- Cited 250 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Neisseria fl ava Bac- Cited 500 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C >50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- TSB, 24 h, 37°C 10,000 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ Cited 1000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriae Bac+ Cited 1000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C 1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Enterococcus faecium VRE Bac+ HIB, Tween 80, 18 h, 37°C 5000–10,000 Nelson (1997)<br />
Lactobacillus sp. Bac+ MRS, cited 5 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Micrococcus fl avus Bac+ Cited 1000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ MHB, cited 1.25–2.5 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Micrococcus ureae Bac+ MHB, cited 2.5 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 100 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Sarcina ureae Bac+ MHB, cited 0.31–0.62 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C >1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
continued
438 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.41 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TSB, 3% EtOH, 24 h, 37°C 10,000 Rota et al. (2004)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 12,500 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 12,500 Bastide et al. (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus MRSA Bac+ HIB, Tween 80, 18 h, 37°C 5000 Nelson (1997)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ MHB, cited 5 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Streptococcus D Bac+ MHB, cited 0.62–5 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Streptococcus micros Bac+ MHB, cited >5 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Alternaria alternata Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 5000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi CA, 7 d, 28 5–8% inh. 500 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi MYB, 72 h, 26°C 3120 Shin (2003)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus var. columnaris Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C >10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi Cited 1000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi MYB, 72 h, 26°C 3120 Shin (2003)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi YES broth, 10 d - 93% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 25,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi YES broth, 10 d - 90% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Cladosporium cladosporoides Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 2500–10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Epidermophyton fl occosum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 439<br />
Fusarium oxysporum Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 156 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Microsporum canis Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 2500–5000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Microsporum canis Fungi MBA, Tween 80, 10 d, 30°C 75– >300 Perrucci et al. (1994)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 5000–10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi MBA, Tween 80, 10 d, 30°C 50– >300 Perrucci et al. (1994)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi SDA, 7 d, 30°C 400, 24% inh. Dikshit <strong>and</strong> Husain (1984)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C >10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 12,500 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium frequentans Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 5000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Penicillium lanosum Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C >10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 12,500 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Scopulariopsis brevicaulis Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Trichophyton equinum Fungi SDA, 7 d, 30°C 400, 10% inh. Dikshit <strong>and</strong> Husain (1984)<br />
Trichophyton interdigitale Fungi Cited 1000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 5000–10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C 300–625 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C
440 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.42<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Lavender Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Activity Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- BLA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air >1600 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Haemophilus infl uenzae Bac- MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 25 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Neisseria sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Bacillus subtilis var. aterrimus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheriae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Lactobacillus sp. Bac+ MRS, cited Disk, 20,000? +++ Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ MHB, cited Disk, 20,000? +++ Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Micrococcus ureae Bac+ MHB, cited Disk, 20,000? ++ Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Mycobacterium avium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd NG Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Sarcina ureae Bac+ MHB, cited Disk, 20,000? + Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 100 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ MHB, cited Disk, 20,000? ++ Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Streptococcus D Bac+ MHB, cited Disk, 20,000? +++ Pellecuer et al. (1980)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 441<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Streptococcus micros Bac+ MHB, cited Disk, 20,000? +++ Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Streptococcus pneumoniae Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 50 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 50 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Alternaria alternata Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 625–2500 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 2500 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 1250–2500 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 1250 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Cladosporium cladosporoides Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 156–312 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 5000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Microsporum canis Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 312–1250 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 312 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 1250 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Penicillium frequentans Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 625 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Penicillium lanosum Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 625 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 2500 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Scopulariopsis brevicaulis Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 125 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 312–625 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)
442 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.43<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Lemon Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition Zone<br />
(mm) Ref.<br />
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 1–10 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Aeromonas hydrophila Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Alcaligenes faecalis Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Beneckea natriegens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Brucella abortus Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- TSA, 24 h, 42°C 4 (h), 25,000 4.6 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- CAB, 24 h, 42°C Disk, 10,000 41 Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Citrobacter freundii Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Erwinia carotovora Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 0–10 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 0 Narasimha Rao <strong>and</strong> Nigam (1970)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 4 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C Disk, 10,000 21 Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 18.5 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Flavobacterium suaveolens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 13.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 0 Narasimha Rao <strong>and</strong> Nigam (1970)<br />
Klebsiella pneumonia Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 6–10 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Klebsiella pneumonia subsp. oceanae Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 443<br />
Moraxella sp. Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Neisseria perfl ava Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus OX19 Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Proteus sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 0 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 1 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Pseudomonas fl uorescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 1 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Pseudomonas mangiferae indicae Bac- NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 14 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 6–10 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 4 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Salmonella paratyphi Bac- NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 16 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Salmonella paratyphi B Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 6–10 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Salmonella pullorum Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Salmonella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 10,0000 0 Narasimha Rao <strong>and</strong> Nigam (1970)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 28 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 1 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Serratia sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Shigella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Vibrio albicans Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 11–13 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Vibrio cholera Bac- NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 12 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Vibrio cholerae Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 6–10 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
continued
444 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.43 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition Zone<br />
(mm) Ref.<br />
Vibrio cholerae Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 10,0000 22 Narasimha Rao <strong>and</strong> Nigam (1970)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus anthracis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 6–10 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Bacillus cereus Bac+ BHA, 24 h, 30°C Disk, 10,000 19 Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Bacillus mesentericus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus mycoides Bac+ NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 12 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Bacillus pumilus Bac+ NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 16 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Bacillus sp. Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 1 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 16 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 19.5 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Brevibacterium linens Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Brochotrix thermosphacta Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Clostridium sporogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheria Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 1 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheria Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 10,0000 0 Narasimha Rao <strong>and</strong> Nigam (1970)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Leuconostoc cremoris Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 3 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 5.3 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ LSA, 24 h, 37°C Disk, 10,000 41 Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 24 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Sarcina alba Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Sarcina beige Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 6–10 Möse et al. (1957)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 445<br />
Sarcina citrea Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 17 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Sarcina rosa Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 6–10 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Sporococcus sarc. Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 6–10 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Staphylococcus albus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 6–10 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 11–15 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 0 Narasimha Rao <strong>and</strong> Nigam (1970)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 6 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 14 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ BHA, 24 h, 37°C Disk, 10,000 14 Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 22 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 18 Narasimha Rao <strong>and</strong> Nigam (1970)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Streptococcus haemolyticus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 6–10 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Streptococcus sp. Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 0 Narasimha Rao <strong>and</strong> Nigam (1970)<br />
Streptococcus viridans Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Streptococcus viridians Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 1 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Streptomyces venezuelae Bac+ SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 11 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Alternaria porri Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 7.3 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Alternaria solani Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 9 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, 48 h, 28°C 5, 5000 7 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 9 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 18 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cicer Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 13.2 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Helminthosporium sativum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 16 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
continued
446 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.43 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition Zone<br />
(mm) Ref.<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 11 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 14 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Nigrospora panici Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 10 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 17 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 11 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 0 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Brettanomyces anomalus Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 18 h, 30°C 6 (h), pure 33.5 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida lipolytica Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 1 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus rhodobenhani Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Debaryomyces hansenii Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Geotrichum c<strong>and</strong>idum Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Hansenula anomala Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kloeckera apiculata Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kluyveromyces fragilis Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Lodderomyces elongisporus Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Metchnikowia pulcherrima Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Pichia membranaefaciens Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Rhodotorula rubra Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Torula glabrata Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 447<br />
TABLE 12.44<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Lemon Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, pH 7 >2000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- CAB, 24 h, 42°C >40,000 Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C >1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10,000 Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 25,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, 24–72 h, 37°C 98% inh. 10,000 Dabbah et al. (1970)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, 24–72 h, 37°C 90% inh. 10,000 Dabbah et al. (1970)<br />
Salmonella schottmuelleri Bac- NA, pH 7 >2000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Salmonella senftenberg Bac- NB, 24–72 h, 37°C 98% inh. 10,000 Dabbah et al. (1970)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, pH 7 >2000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Bacillus cereus Bac+ BHA, 24 h, 30°C 10,000 Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, pH 7 2000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C >1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Bac+ NA, pH 7 1000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ LSA, 24 h, 37°C 2500 Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Micrococcus sp. Bac+ NA, pH 7 2000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 800 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ BHA, 24 h, 37°C >40,000 Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, 24–72 h, 37°C 10,000 Dabbah et al. (1970)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C 500 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 6400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
continued
448 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.44 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, pH 7 1000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Aspergillus awamorii Fungi PDA, pH 4.5 >2000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, pH 4.5 >2000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 8 h, 20°C, spore germ. inh. 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, pH 4.5 >2000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi YES broth, 10 d 4% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 800 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi YES broth, 10 d 22% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus oryzae Fungi Cited >500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 8 h, 20°C, spore germ. inh. 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
Botrytis cinera Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 7 d, 24°C 4% inh. 1000 Bouchra et al. (2003)<br />
Fusarium culmorum Fungi YES broth, 10 d 0% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Geotrichum citri-aurantii Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 7 d, 24°C 0% inh. 1000 Bouchra et al. (2003)<br />
Mucor hiemalis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor racemosus Fungi Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Mucor racemosus f. racemosus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 25,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 1600 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 449<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 7 d, 24°C 0% inh. 1000 Bouchra et al. (2003)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi SDB, 5 d, 20°C, MIC = ED50 500–1000 Caccioni et al. (1998)<br />
Penicillium italicum Fungi SDB, 5 d, 20°C, MIC = ED50 1000–2500 Caccioni et al. (1998)<br />
Phytophthora citrophthora Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 7 d, 24°C 20% inh. 1000 Bouchra et al. (2003)<br />
Rhizopus 66-81-2 Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus arrhizus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus chinensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus circinans Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus japonicus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus kazanensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus oryzae Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus pymacus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 12,500 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Rhizopus stolonifer Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus tritici Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast MHB, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 20,000 Hammer et al. (1998)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C 500 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 6400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast PDA, pH 4.5 500 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Torula utilis Yeast PDA, pH 4.5 1000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Zygosaccharomyces mellis Yeast PDA, pH 4.5 >2000 Subba et al. (1967)
450 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.45<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Lemon Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Activity Ref.<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- CAB, 24 h, 42°C Disk, 10,000 +++ Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 ++ Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C Disk, 10,000 +++ Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- BLA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air >1600 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Haemophilus infl uenzae Bac- MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 200 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Neisseria sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Bacillus cereus Bac+ BHA, 24 h, 30°C Disk, 10,000 +++ Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheriae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ LSA, 24 h, 37°C Disk, 10,000 +++ Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ BHA, 24 h, 37°C Disk, 10,000 +++ Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 800 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus pneumoniae Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 400 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 200 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Botrytis cinera Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Colletotrichum gleosporoides Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Eurotium amstelodami Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium herbarum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium repens Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium rubrum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Penicillium corylophilum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 ++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Pythium ultimum Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Rhizoctonia solani Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 451<br />
TABLE 12.46<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> M<strong>and</strong>arin Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition Zone<br />
(mm) Ref.<br />
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 1 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Aeromonas hydrophila Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Alcaligenes faecalis Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Beneckea natriegens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- TSA, 24 h, 42°C 4 (h), 25,000 4 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 11 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Citrobacter freundii Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- MHA, 24 h, 30°C 6, 15,000 7 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Erwinia carotovora Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 0 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 4 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHA, 24 h, 30°C 6, 15,000 8 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Flavobacterium suaveolens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Moraxella sp. Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Neisseria perfl ava Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
continued
452 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.46 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition Zone<br />
(mm) Ref.<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 9 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHA, 24 h, 30°C 6, 15,000 6 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 0 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 4 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Salmonella pullorum Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 9 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus mesentericus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Brevibacterium linens Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Brochotrix thermosphacta Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Clostridium perfringens Bac+ Cited 6, 15,000 35 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Clostridium sporogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Leuconostoc cremoris Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 453<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 4.2 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 15 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 4.1 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHA, 24 h, 37°C 6, 15,000 17 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Streptomyces venezuelae Bac+ SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Alternaria solani Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 11 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 12 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Helminthosporium sativum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 22 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Nigrospora panici Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 10 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus rhodobenhani Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)
454 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.47<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> M<strong>and</strong>arin Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C >1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, 24–72 h, 37°C 98% inh. 10,000 Dabbah et al. (1970)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, 24–72 h, 37°C 87% inh. 10,000 Dabbah et al. (1970)<br />
Salmonella senftenberg Bac- NB, 24–72 h, 37°C >10,000 Dabbah et al. (1970)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 24 h, 37°C 2500 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C >1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C >1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, 24–72 h, 37°C 10,000 Dabbah et al. (1970)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C 1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Annotation: Terpeneless m<strong>and</strong>arin oil tested Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958).<br />
TABLE 12.48<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> M<strong>and</strong>arin Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Activity Ref.<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium amstelodami Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium herbarum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium repens Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium rubrum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Penicillium corylophilum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 + Guynot et al. (2003)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 455<br />
TABLE 12.49<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Matricaria Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition<br />
Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 0 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Aeromonas hydrophila Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Alcaligenes faecalis Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Beneckea natriegens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Brucella abortus Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 0 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Citrobacter freundii Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Erwinia carotovora Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 0 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 0 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Flavobacterium suaveolens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella pneumonia Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Klebsiella pneumonia subsp. Oceanae Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Moraxella sp. Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Proteus OX19 Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 0 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 0 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 0 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 0 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas fl uorescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 0 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
continued
456 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.49 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition<br />
Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Salmonella paratyphi B Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 0 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Salmonella pullorum Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 0 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Vibrio albicans Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 1 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Vibrio cholerae Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus anthracis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 0 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 13.5 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Brevibacterium linens Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Brochotrix thermosphacta Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Clostridium sporogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheria Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 1 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Leuconostoc cremoris Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0–11 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 457<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 15.5 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Sarcina alba Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 0 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Sarcina beige Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 6–10 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Sarcina citrea Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 0 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Sarcina rosa Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 6–10 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Sporococcus sarc. Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 6–10 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Staphylococcus albus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 11.5 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Streptococcus haemolyticus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Streptococcus viridians Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 5 × 20, 1000 2–5 Möse et al. (1957)<br />
Alternaria porri Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 9.7 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 10 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, 48 h, 28°C 5, 5000 0 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2006)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cicer Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 9 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 10 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 11 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 0 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 18 h, 30°C 6 (h), pure 9.5 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)
458 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.50<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Matricaria Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C >1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C >8000 Aggag <strong>and</strong> Yousef (1972)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Agar, cited 10,000 Kedzia et al. (1991)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C >50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Helicobacter pylori Bac- Cited, 20 h, 37°C 35.7–70.4 Weseler et al. (2005)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- Agar, cited 10,000 Kedzia et al. (1991)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Agar, cited 7500 Kedzia et al. (1991)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C >50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 6000 Aggag <strong>and</strong> Yousef (1972)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C >1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 1600 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac+ NB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C >8000 Aggag <strong>and</strong> Yousef (1972)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C 1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Agar, cited 2500 Kedzia et al. (1991)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 7000 Aggag <strong>and</strong> Yousef (1972)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 25,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ Agar, cited 2500 Kedzia et al. (1991)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 459<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 7–14 d, 28°C >3000 Soliman <strong>and</strong> Badeaa (2002)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi YES broth, 10 d -63% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi PDA, 7–14 d, 28°C >3000 Soliman <strong>and</strong> Badeaa (2002)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi YES broth, 10 d -56% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 7–14 d, 28°C >3000 Soliman <strong>and</strong> Badeaa (2002)<br />
Botrytis cinera Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 7 d, 24°C 0% inh. 1000 Bouchra et al. (2003)<br />
Fusarium culmorum Fungi YES broth, 10 d -75% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Fusarium moniliforme Fungi PDA, 7–14 d, 28°C >3000 Soliman <strong>and</strong> Badeaa (2002)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi Agar, cited 1000 Kedzia et al. (1991)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Phytophthora citrophthora Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 7 d, 24°C 2% inh. 1000 Bouchra et al. (2003)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi SDA, 21 d, 20°C 1000 Szalontai et al. (1977)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi SDA, 21 d, 20°C 1000 Szalontai et al. (1977)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C 500 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 7 d, 37°C 1000 Szalontai et al. (1977)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Agar, cited 5000 Kedzia et al. (1991)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 7000 Aggag <strong>and</strong> Yousef (1972)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)
460 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.51<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Matricaria Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Activity Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 +++ Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Neisseria sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 +++ Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 +++ Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 ++ Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheriae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 ++ Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Botrytis cinera Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Colletotrichum gleosporoides Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Pythium ultimum Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Rhizoctonia solani Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 +++ Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 461<br />
TABLE 12.52<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Mint Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition<br />
Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Aeromonas hydrophila Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Alcaligenes faecalis Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Beneckea natriegens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 90 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Citrobacter freundii Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Erwinia carotovora Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited 15, 2500 1 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 14.5 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Escherichia coli O157 Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 13.5 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Flavobacterium suaveolens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 2 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Moraxella sp. Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Proteus sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 2 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Salmonella agona Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 12 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Salmonella braenderup Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 13 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Salmonella derby Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 10 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 13.5 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Salmonella gallinarum Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 52.5 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
continued
462 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.52 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition<br />
Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Salmonella hadar Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 13.5 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Salmonella mb<strong>and</strong>aka Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 11.5 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Salmonella montevideo Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 12 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Salmonella pullorum Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Salmonella saintpaul Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 12 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Salmonella schwarzergrund Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 11.5 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Salmonella senftenberg Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 12 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Salmonella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 4 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- Cited 6, 15,000 47.5 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 4.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Serratia sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 6 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Shigella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 2 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus sp. Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 10 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 14.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Brevibacterium linens Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Brochotrix thermosphacta Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Clostridium perfringens Bac+ Cited 6, 15,000 90 Wannissorn et al. (2005)<br />
Clostridium sporogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 463<br />
Leuconostoc cremoris Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 2 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 12 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 2 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 14 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Streptococcus viridans Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 1 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Absidia corMYBifera Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 10 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 10 d, 25°C 50 NG Sarbhoy et al. (1978)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi PDA, 10 d, 25°C 50 NG Sarbhoy et al. (1978)<br />
Aspergillus sulphureus Fungi PDA, 10 d, 25°C 50 NG Sarbhoy et al. (1978)<br />
Humicola grisea var. thermoidea Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 15 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Mucor fragilis Fungi PDA, 10 d, 25°C 50 NG Sarbhoy et al. (1978)<br />
Rhizopus stolonifer Fungi PDA, 10 d, 25°C 50 NG Sarbhoy et al. (1978)<br />
Sporotrichum thermophile Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 20 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Thermoascus aurantiacis Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 10 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Thermomyces lanuginosa Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 0 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Thielava minor Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 0 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Torula thermophila Yeast EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 10 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)
464 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.53<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Mint Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited, 24 h 400 Imai et al. (2001)<br />
Helicobacter pylori Bac- Cited, 48 h 100 Imai et al. (2001)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- Cited, 24 h 800 Imai et al. (2001)<br />
Enterococcus faecium VRE Bac+ HIB, Tween 80, 18 h, 37°C 5000–10,000 Nelson (1997)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus MRSA Bac+ Cited, 24 h 400 Imai et al. (2001)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus MRSA Bac+ HIB, Tween 80, 18 h, 37°C 5000 Nelson (1997)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus MSSA Bac+ Cited, 24 h 400 Imai et al. (2001)<br />
Alternaria alternate Fungi SDA, 6–8 h, 20°C 63% inh. 500 Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi CA, 7 d, 28°C 500 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi Cited 1000 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi SDA, 6–8 h, 20°C 65% inh. 500 Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi CA, 7 d, 28°C 81% inh. 500 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Botryodiplodia theobromae Fungi CA, 7 d, 28°C 87% inh. 500 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Cladosporium cladosporoides Fungi CA, 7 d, 28°C >500 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum Fungi CA, 7 d, 28°C 83% inh. 500 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Helminthosporium oryzae Fungi CA, 7 d, 28°C 500 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Helminthosporium oryzae Fungi MA, cited a 2000 Dikshit et al. (1979)<br />
Helminthosporium oryzae Fungi MA, pH 5.0, 6 d, 28°C a,b 2000 Dikshit et al. (1982)<br />
Helminthosporium oryzae Fungi MA, pH 4.0, 6 d, 28°C a,b 500 Dikshit et al. (1982)<br />
Macrophomina phaesoli Fungi CA, 7 d, 28°C 94% inh. 500 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi SDA, 6–8 h, 20°C 64% inh. 500 Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Penicillium italicum Fungi SDA, 6–8 h, 20°C 65% inh. 500 Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Sclerotium rolfsii Fungi CA, 7 d, 28°C 500 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi SDA, 6–8 h, 20°C 69% inh. 500 Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi SDA, 6–8 h, 20°C 36% inh. 500 Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Cited, 48 h, 36°C a 1100 Duarte et al. (2005)<br />
a<br />
Mentha arvensis var. piperascens.<br />
b<br />
Dementholized oil.
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 465<br />
TABLE 12.54<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Neroli Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition Zone<br />
(mm) Ref.<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Imai et al. (2001)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Imai et al. (2001)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 2 Imai et al. (2001)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 14 Nelson (1997)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 22 Imai et al. (2001)<br />
Klebsiella aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 0 Nelson (1997)<br />
Klebsiella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Imai et al. (2001)<br />
Neisseria perfl ava Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 2 Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Proteus sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 2 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 12 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Salmonella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 19 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Serratia sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Dikshit et al. (1979)<br />
Shigella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 1 Dikshit et al. (1982)<br />
Vibrio cholerae Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 0 Dikshit et al. (1982)<br />
Bacillus mesentericus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 7 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Bacillus sp. Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 1 Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 19 Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 22 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheriae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 18 Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 11–19 Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
continued
466 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.54 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition Zone<br />
(mm) Ref.<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 20 Duarte et al. (2005)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Imai et al. (2001)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 0 Imai et al. (2001)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Imai et al. (2001)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 2 Nelson (1997)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 13.6 Imai et al. (2001)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 1 Nelson (1997)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 22 Imai et al. (2001)<br />
Streptococcus sp. Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 0 Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Streptococcus viridans Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 0 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Streptomyces venezuelae Bac+ SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 9 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Alternaria solani Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 9 Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 5 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 9 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 26 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Helminthosporium sativum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 9 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 9 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 22 Dikshit et al. (1979)<br />
Nigrospora panici Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 5 Dikshit et al. (1982)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 56 Dikshit et al. (1982)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 9 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 21 Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 8 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 18 h, 30°C 6 (h), pure 30 Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Dikshit et al. (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Duarte et al. (2005)<br />
Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Imai et al. (2001)<br />
Cryptococcus rhodobenhani Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Imai et al. (2001)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 4 Imai et al. (2001)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 467<br />
TABLE 12.55<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Neroli Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 25,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 25,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 6400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi YES broth, 10 d -86% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi YES broth, 10 d -90% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus oryzae Fungi Cited 250 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Cephalosporium sacchari Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C 20,000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Ceratocystis paradoxa Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C 20,000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Curvularia lunata Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C 4000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Fusarium culmorum Fungi YES broth, 10 d -71% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Fusarium moniliforme var. subglutinans Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C 2000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Helminthosporium sacchari Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C 2000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Mucor racemosus Fungi Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi Cited 250 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 6400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Physalospora tucumanensis Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C 20,000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 1600 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Sclerotium rolfsii Fungi OA, EtOH, 6 d, 20°C 20,000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)
468 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.56<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Neroli Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Activity Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 +++ Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Neisseria sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 +++ Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Bacillus subtilis var. aterrimus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheriae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Mycobacterium avium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd NG Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 469<br />
TABLE 12.57<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Nutmeg Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition Zone<br />
(mm) Ref.<br />
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 10.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Aeromonas hydrophila Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 11.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Alcaligenes faecalis Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Beneckea natriegens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- TSA, 24 h, 42°C 4 (h), 25,000 5.5 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Citrobacter freundii Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 13.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 10.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Erwinia carotovora Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited 15, 2500 3 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 8 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 10.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 6.9 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 18 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Flavobacterium suaveolens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 13 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 2 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Moraxella sp. Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Proteus sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 5 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 0 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 0 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 7.6 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Salmonella pullorum Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 17 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
continued
470 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.57 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions<br />
Inhibition Zone<br />
(mm) Ref.<br />
Salmonella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 2 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 18 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Serratia sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 3 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Shigella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 2 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 10.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus sp. Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 5 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 8.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 34 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Brevibacterium linens Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Brochotrix thermosphacta Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 5.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Clostridium sporogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Leuconostoc cremoris Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0–12 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 7.7 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 27 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 3 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 6.5 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 8.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 15.5 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 1 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 471<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Streptococcus viridans Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Alternaria porri Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 8.3 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, 48 h, 28°C 5, 5000 5 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 40 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cicer Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 0 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 28 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 60 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 19 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Brettanomyces anomalus Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 13 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 18 h, 30°C 6 (h), pure 24 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida lipolytica Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Debaryomyces hansenii Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Geotrichum c<strong>and</strong>idum Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Hansenula anomala Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kloeckera apiculata Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kluyveromyces fragilis Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Lodderomyces elongisporus Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Metchnikowia pulcherrima Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Pichia membranaefaciens Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Rhodotorula rubra Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Torula glabrata Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)
472 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.58<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Nutmeg Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- TSB, 24 h, 42°C >10,000 Smith-Palmer et al.<br />
(1998)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 800 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
37°C<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C >1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSB, 24 h, 35°C >10,000 Smith-Palmer et al.<br />
(1998)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, >50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
37°C<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- TSB, 24 h, 35°C >10,000 Smith-Palmer et al.<br />
(1998)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 6400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
37°C<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C 1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSB, 24 h, 35°C 10,000 Smith-Palmer et al.<br />
(1998)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 25,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
37°C<br />
Alternaria alternata Fungi PDA, 7 d, 28°C 0% inh. 500 Feng <strong>and</strong> Zheng (2007)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 8 h, 20°C, spore 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
germ. inh.<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon<br />
(1986)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 1600 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi YES broth, 10 d -88% inh. Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
10,000<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi YES broth, 10 d -86% inh. Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
10,000<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 8 h, 20°C, spore 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
germ. inh.<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon<br />
(1986)<br />
Epidermophyton<br />
fl occosum<br />
Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d,<br />
20°C<br />
300–625 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
Fusarium culmorum Fungi YES broth, 10 d ->10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Mucor hiemalis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon<br />
(1986)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon<br />
(1986)<br />
continued
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 473<br />
TABLE 12.58 (continued)<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Nutmeg Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Mucor racemosus f.<br />
racemosus<br />
Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon<br />
(1986)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Rhizopus 66-81-2 Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon<br />
(1986)<br />
Rhizopus arrhizus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon<br />
(1986)<br />
Rhizopus chinensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon<br />
(1986)<br />
Rhizopus circinans Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon<br />
(1986)<br />
Rhizopus japonicus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon<br />
(1986)<br />
Rhizopus kazanensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon<br />
(1986)<br />
Rhizopus oryzae Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon<br />
(1986)<br />
Rhizopus pymacus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon<br />
(1986)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Rhizopus stolonifer Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon<br />
(1986)<br />
Rhizopus tritici Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon<br />
(1986)<br />
Trichophyton<br />
mentagrophytes<br />
Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d,<br />
20°C<br />
625–1250 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 300–625 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
20°C<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C 500 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NB, Tween 20, 18 h,<br />
37°C<br />
3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
TABLE 12.59<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Nutmeg Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Activity Ref.<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Bacillus subtilis var. aterrimus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Mycobacterium avium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd ++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)
474 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.60<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Peppermint Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Inhibition Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 14.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Aeromonas hydrophila Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 13 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Alcaligenes faecalis Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Beneckea natriegens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 16.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- TSA, 24 h, 42°C 4 (h), 25,000 7.1 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Citrobacter freundii Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Erwinia carotovora Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 11 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 0 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited 15, 2500 5 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 5 (h), -30,000 23 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 9.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 6.8 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Flavobacterium suaveolens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 12 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 11 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Moraxella sp. Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Neisseria perfl ava Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 10 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 0 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 0 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 6.3 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 475<br />
Salmonella paratyphi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 6, sd 18 Dube <strong>and</strong> Rao (1984)<br />
Salmonella pullorum Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 15 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Salmonella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 1 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 20 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Serratia sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 3 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Shigella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 3 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Vibrio cholera Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 6, sd 16 Dube <strong>and</strong> Rao (1984)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 13 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus anthracis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6, sd 17 Dube <strong>and</strong> Rao (1984)<br />
Bacillus mesentericus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus pumilus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6, sd 13 Dube <strong>and</strong> Rao (1984)<br />
Bacillus sp. Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 10 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 8 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 10 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 21.5 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 14.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Brevibacterium linens Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 12 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Brochotrix thermosphacta Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Clostridium sporogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 11 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Leuconostoc cremoris Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 10 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 13–20 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 5.3 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 16 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 8 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 12 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
continued
476 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.60 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Inhibition Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 6, sd 13 Dube <strong>and</strong> Rao (1984)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 19 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 6.4 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 10 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 5 (h), -30,000 15 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Streptococcus viridans Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Streptomyces venezuelae Bac+ SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Absidia cormybifera Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 0 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Alternaria porri Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 10.6 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Alternaria solani Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 10 d, 25°C 10 – Sarbhoy et al. (1978)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi PDA, 10 d, 25°C 10 – Sarbhoy et al. (1978)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi SDA, 3 d, 28°C 6, sd 10 Saksena <strong>and</strong> Saksena (1984)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, 48 h, 28°C 5, 5000 0 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 60 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Aspergillus sulphureus Fungi PDA, 10 d, 25°C 10 – Sarbhoy et al. (1978)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cicer Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 10 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Helminthosporium sativum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Humicola grisea var. thermoidea Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 30 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Keratinomyces afelloi Fungi SDA, 3 d, 28°C 6, sd 18 Saksena <strong>and</strong> Saksena (1984)<br />
Keratinophyton terreum Fungi SDA, 3 d, 28°C 6, sd 0 Saksena <strong>and</strong> Saksena (1984)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi SDA, 3 d, 28°C 6, sd 10 Saksena <strong>and</strong> Saksena (1984)<br />
Mucor fragilis Fungi PDA, 10 d, 25°C 10 – Sarbhoy et al. (1978)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 8 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 23 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Nigrospora panici Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 8 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 60 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 8 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 477<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 22 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Rhizopus stolonifer Fungi PDA, 10 d, 25°C 10 – Sarbhoy et al. (1978)<br />
Sporotrichum thermophile Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 0 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Thermoascus aurantiacis Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 0 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Thermomyces lanuginosa Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 0 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Thielava minor Fungi EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 15 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)<br />
Trichophyton equinum Fungi SDA, 3 d, 28°C 6, sd 14 Saksena <strong>and</strong> Saksena (1984)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi SDA, 3 d, 28°C 6, sd 16 Saksena <strong>and</strong> Saksena (1984)<br />
Brettanomyces anomalus Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 10 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 18 h, 30°C 6 (h), pure 16 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 3 d, 28°C 6, sd 18 Saksena <strong>and</strong> Saksena (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 1 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida lipolytica Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast SDA, 3 d, 28°C 6, sd 23 Saksena <strong>and</strong> Saksena (1984)<br />
Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus rhodobenhani Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Debaryomyces hansenii Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Geotrichum c<strong>and</strong>idum Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 7 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Hansenula anomala Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kloeckera apiculata Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kluyveromyces fragilis Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Lodderomyces elongisporus Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Metchnikowia pulcherrima Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 9 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Pichia membranaefaciens Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Rhodotorula rubra Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 7 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast NA, 24 h, 20°C 5 (h), -30,000 12–15 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Torula glabrata Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 8 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Torula thermophila Yeast EYA, 48 h, 45°C 5, sd 0 Nigam <strong>and</strong> Rao (1979)
478 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.61<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Peppermint Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Treponema denticola Bac HS, 72 h, 37°C 1000 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Treponema vincentii Bac HS, 72 h, 37°C 2000 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Actinobacillus<br />
Bac- HS, 72 h, 37°C 3000 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
actinomycetemcomitans<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- TSB, 24 h, 42°C 1000 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Capnocytophaga sp. Bac- HS, 72 h, 37°C 3000 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Eikenella corrodens Bac- HS, 72 h, 37°C 2000 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited, 24 h 800 Imai et al. (2001)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C >1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 1600 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGB, 18 h, 37°C 5700 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHB, 24 h, 36°C >10,000 Duarte et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSB, 24 h, 35°C >10,000 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Fusobacterium nucleatum Bac- HS, 72 h, 37°C 2000 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Helicobacter pylori Bac- Cited, 48 h 100 Imai et al. (2001)<br />
Helicobacter pylori Bac- Cited, 20 h, 37°C 135.6 Weseler et al. (2005)<br />
Porphyromonas gingivalis Bac- HS, 72 h, 37°C 2000 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Prevotella buccae Bac- HS, 72 h, 37°C 2000 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Prevotella intermedia Bac- HS, 72 h, 37°C 3000 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Prevotella nigrescens Bac- HS, 72 h, 37°C 2000 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C >50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- Cited, 24 h 400 Imai et al. (2001)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- TSB, 24 h, 35°C >10,000 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Selenomonas artemidis Bac- HS, 72 h, 37°C 1000 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Actinomyces viscosus Bac+ HS, 16–24, 37°C 5000 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 1600 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C >1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSB, 24 h, 35°C 300 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 479<br />
Peptostreptococcus anaerobius Bac+ HS, 72 h, 37°C 2000 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TSB, 24 h, 35°C 400 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C 1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 6400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus MRSA Bac+ Cited, 24 h 200 Imai et al. (2001)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus MSSA Bac+ Cited, 24 h 200 Imai et al. (2001)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ TGB, 18 h, 37°C 5700 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Streptococcus sanguinis Bac+ HS, 16–24, 37°C 6000 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Streptococcus sobrinus Bac+ HS, 16–24, 37°C 3000 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 8 h, 20°C, spore germ. inh. 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 800 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi YES broth, 10 d - 98% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi YES broth, 10 d - 93% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus oryzae Fungi Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 8 h, 20°C, spore germ. inh. 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Botrytis cinera Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 7 d, 24°C 0% inh. 1000 Bouchra et al. (2003)<br />
Epidermophyton fl occosum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C 300–625 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
Fusarium culmorum Fungi YES broth, 10 d - >10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Geotrichum citri-aurantii Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 7 d, 24°C 0% inh. 1000 Bouchra et al. (2003)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi SDA, 7 d, 30°C 400, 37% inh. Dikshit <strong>and</strong> Husain (1984)<br />
Mucor hiemalis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor racemosus Fungi Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Mucor racemosus f. racemosus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 1600 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 7 d, 24°C 0% inh. 1000 Bouchra et al. (2003)<br />
Phytophthora citrophthora Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 7 d, 24°C 14% inh. 1000 Bouchra et al. (2003)<br />
Rhizopus 66-81-2 Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
continued
480 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.61 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Rhizopus arrhizus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus chinensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus circinans Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus japonicus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus kazanensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus oryzae Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus pymacus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 6400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Rhizopus stolonifer Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus tritici Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Trichophyton equinum Fungi SDA, 7 d, 30°C 400, 51% inh. Dikshit <strong>and</strong> Husain (1984)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C 625–1250 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi SDA, 7 d, 30°C 400, 61% inh. Dikshit <strong>and</strong> Husain (1984)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C 300–625 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 800 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C >1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast MHB, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 5000 Hammer et al. (1998)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast YPB, 24 h, 20°C 400 Schelz et al. (2006)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 481<br />
TABLE 12.62<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Peppermint Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Activity Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 ++ Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- BLA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air >1600 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Haemophilus infl uenzae Bac- MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 12.5 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Neisseria sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Bacillus subtilis var. aterrimus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd ++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheriae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Mycobacterium avium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd NG Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd ++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 25 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Streptococcus pneumoniae Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 25 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 25 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Botrytis cinera Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Colletotrichum gleosporoides Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Eurotium amstelodami Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 ++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium herbarum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium repens Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 ++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium rubrum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Penicillium corylophilum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 + Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Pythium ultimum Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Rhizoctonia solani Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)
482 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.63<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Pinus sylvestris Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Inhibition Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bordetella bronchiseptica Bac- MHA, 18 h, 37°C 6, 17,500 0 Schales et al. (1993)<br />
Citrobacter freundii Bac- MHA, 18 h, 37°C 6, 17,500 0 Schales et al. (1993)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 1 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 11.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Escherichia coli 1 Bac- MHA, 18 h, 37°C 6, 17,500 8 Schales et al. (1993)<br />
Escherichia coli 2 Bac- MHA, 18 h, 37°C 6, 17,500 0 Schales et al. (1993)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- MHA, 18 h, 37°C 6, 17,500 0 Schales et al. (1993)<br />
Neisseria perfl ava Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus mirabilis Bac- MHA, 18 h, 37°C 6, 17,500 0 Schales et al. (1993)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHA, 18 h, 37°C 6, 17,500 0 Schales et al. (1993)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 0 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus mesentericus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus sp. Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C 6, 17,500 11 Schales et al. (1993)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 8.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Clostridium perfringens Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C 6, 17,500 23 Schales et al. (1993)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 483<br />
Enterococcus sp. Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C 6, 17,500 15 Schales et al. (1993)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 7.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Staphylococcus sp. Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C 6, 17,500 6 Schales et al. (1993)<br />
Streptomyces venezuelae Bac+ SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Alternaria solani Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 8 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 9 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 12 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Helminthosporium sativum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 12 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 15 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Nigrospora panici Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 12 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 10 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 16.3 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 10 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus rhodobenhani Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 14 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 18 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)
484 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.64<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Pinus sylvestris Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Acinetobacter baumannii Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Aeromonas sobria Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C >29,000 Chalchat et al. (1989)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 64,300 Bastide et al. (1987)<br />
Klebsiella pneumonia Bac- MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 3500 Chalchat et al. (1989)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Proteus mirabilis Bac- MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C >29,000 Chalchat et al. (1989)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C >29,000 Chalchat et al. (1989)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Bacillus sp. Bac+ CA, 7 d, 25°C 5000 Motiejunaite <strong>and</strong> Peciulyte (2004)<br />
Enterococcus faecalis Bac+ MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Rhodococcus sp. Bac+ CA, 7 d, 25°C 5000 Motiejunaite <strong>and</strong> Peciulyte (2004)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 3500 Chalchat et al. (1989)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 4000 Bastide et al. (1987)<br />
Alternaria alternata Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 5000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus var. columnaris Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 1250 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 5000–10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 5000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi CA, 7 d, 25°C 7500–15,000 Motiejunaite <strong>and</strong> Peciulyte (2004)<br />
Aspergillus versicolor Fungi CA, 7 d, 25°C 7500–15,000 Motiejunaite <strong>and</strong> Peciulyte (2004)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 485<br />
Aureobasidum pullulans Fungi CA, 7 d, 25°C 5000–7500 Motiejunaite <strong>and</strong> Peciulyte (2004)<br />
Chaetomium globosum Fungi CA, 7 d, 25°C 5000 Motiejunaite <strong>and</strong> Peciulyte (2004)<br />
Cladosporium cladosporoides Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 1250–2500 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Cladosporium cladosporoides Fungi CA, 7 d, 25°C 5000 Motiejunaite <strong>and</strong> Peciulyte (2004)<br />
Epidermophyton fl occosum Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 1250 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 312 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Microsporum canis Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 1250–5000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 2500–5000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Paecilomyces variotii Fungi CA, 7 d, 25°C >10,000 Thanaboripat et al. (2004)<br />
Motiejunaite <strong>and</strong> Peciulyte (2004)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi CA, 7 d, 25°C 10,000–25,000 Motiejunaite <strong>and</strong> Peciulyte (2004)<br />
Penicillium frequentans Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 1250 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Penicillium lanosum Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Phoma glomerata Fungi CA, 7 d, 25°C 10,000–25,000 Motiejunaite <strong>and</strong> Peciulyte (2004)<br />
Phoma sp. Fungi CA, 7 d, 25°C 7500 Motiejunaite <strong>and</strong> Peciulyte (2004)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C >10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Rhizopus stolonifer Fungi CA, 7 d, 25°C 5000–7500 Motiejunaite <strong>and</strong> Peciulyte (2004)<br />
Scopulariopsis brevicaulis Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Stachybotrys chartarum Fungi CA, 7 d, 25°C 10,000–15,000 Motiejunaite <strong>and</strong> Peciulyte (2004)<br />
Trichoderma viride Fungi CA, 7 d, 25°C 5500 Motiejunaite <strong>and</strong> Peciulyte (2004)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 2500–5000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 14,000 Chalchat et al. (1989)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida lipolytica Yeast CA, 7 d, 25°C 5000 Motiejunaite <strong>and</strong> Peciulyte (2004)<br />
Geotrichum c<strong>and</strong>ida Yeast CA, 7 d, 25°C 3500–5000 Motiejunaite <strong>and</strong> Peciulyte (2004)
486 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Table 12.65<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Pinus sylvestris Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Activity Ref.<br />
Botrytis cinera Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Colletotrichum gleosporoides Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Pythium ultimum Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Rhizoctonia solani Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 487<br />
TABLE 12.66<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Rosemary Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Inhibition Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 15 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Aerobacter tumefaciens Bac- Cited (h) 20,000 — Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Aeromonas hydrophila Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Alcaligenes faecalis Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Beneckea natriegens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- TSA, 24 h, 42°C 4 (h), 25,000 9.3 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Citrobacter freundii Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- MHA, 24 h, 30°C 6, 15,000 7 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Erwinia carotovora Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited (h) 20,000 - to +++ Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited 15, 2500 1 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 1 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 12 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited, 24 h, 37°C —
488 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.66 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Inhibition Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Flavobacterium suaveolens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Haemophilus infl uenza Bac- Cited (h) 20,000 — Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Klebsiella aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 10,0000 20 Narasimha Rao <strong>and</strong> Nigam (1970)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Moraxella sp. Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Neisseria perfl ava Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Peptobacterium carotovorum Bac- Cited (h) 20,000 +++ Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Proteus sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- Cited w 20,000 +++ Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited (h) 20,000 +++ Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 0 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHA, 24 h, 30°C 6, 15,000 6 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 11 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 11 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Pseudomonas pisi Bac- Cited (h) 20,000 ++ Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Pseudomonas tabaci Bac- Cited (h) 20,000 +++ Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 9.3 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 489<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- Cited, 24 h, 37°C —
490 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.66 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Inhibition Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Lactobacillus sp. Bac+ MRS, cited 9, 20,000 16.5 – >90 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Leuconostoc cremoris Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 7.1 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 16 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ MHA, cited 9, 20,000 18–26 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Micrococcus ureae Bac+ MHA, cited 9, 20,000 21 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 23 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pneumococcus sp. Bac+ Cited (h) 20,000 ++ Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Sarcina ureae Bac+ MHA, cited 9, 20,000 >90 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited (h) 20,000 — Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 10,0000 0 Narasimha Rao <strong>and</strong> Nigam (1970)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 0 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 10 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 12 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 5.9 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHA, 24 h, 37°C 6, 15,000 16 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 10.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 17.9 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 5 (h), -30,000 0 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ MHA, cited 9, 20,000 12 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 22 Narasimha Rao <strong>and</strong> Nigam (1970)<br />
Streptococcus aegui Bac+ Cited (h) 20,000 + Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Streptococcus D Bac+ MHA, cited 9, 20,000 0–30 Pellecuer et al. (1980)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 491<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ Cited (h) 20,000 ++ Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 15 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Streptococcus haemolyticus Bac+ Cited (h) 20,000 + Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Streptococcus micros Bac+ MHA, cited 9, 20,000 18 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Streptococcus sp. Bac+ Cited (h) 20,000 + Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Streptococcus sp. Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 100,000 30 Narasimha Rao <strong>and</strong> Nigam (1970)<br />
Streptococcus viridans Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Streptomyces venezuelae Bac+ SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 10 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Alternaria porri Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 21 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Alternaria solani Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi SDA, 72 h, 26°C 8, 25,000 2 Shin (2003)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDA, 72 h, 26°C 8, 25,000 0 Shin (2003)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, 48 h, 28°C 5, 5000 7 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 10 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Fusarium moniliforme Fungi Cited (h) 20,000 — Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cicer Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 11 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Fusarium solani Fungi Cited (h) 20,000 — Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Helminthosporium sativum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 9 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 18 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Nigrospora panici Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Ophiobolus graminis Fungi Cited (h) 20,000 — Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 20 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 0 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Brettanomyces anomalus Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
continued
492 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.66 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Inhibition Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Cited (h) 20,000 — Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 7 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 13 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 18 h, 30°C 6 (h), pure 24 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 1 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida lipolytica Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus rhodobenhani Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Debaryomyces hansenii Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Geotrichum c<strong>and</strong>idum Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Hansenula anomala Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kloeckera apiculata Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kluyveromyces fragilis Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Lodderomyces elongisporus Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Metchnikowia pulcherrima Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Pichia membranaefaciens Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Rhodotorula rubra Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 8 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast Cited (h) 20,000 — Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast NA, 24 h, 20°C 5 (h), -30,000 10 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 12 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Schizosaccharomyces pombe Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 16 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Torula glabrata Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Torula utilis Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 10 Hili et al. (1997)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 493<br />
TABLE 12.67<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Rosemary Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Acinetobacter baumannii Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 10,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Aeromonas sobria Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 5000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Bordetella bronchiseptica Bac- Cited 2500 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- TSB, 24 h, 42°C 500 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSB, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 40 Panizzi et al. (1993)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 25% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C >900 Angioni et al. (2004)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited 2500 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 3500 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSB, 24 h, 35°C >10,000 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 10,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 25,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Haemophilus infl uenza Bac- Cited 2500 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Helicobacter pylori Bac- Cited, 20 h, 37°C 137 Weseler et al. (2005)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- Cited 2500 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Moraxella glucidolytica Bac- Cited 2500 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Neisseria catarrhalis Bac- Cited 1250 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Neisseria fl ava Bac- Cited 1250 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- TSB, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C >40 Panizzi et al. (1993)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 54% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C >900 Angioni et al. (2004)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas fl uorescens Bac- NA, 1–3 d, 30°C Thanaboripat et al. (2004)<br />
Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- TSB, 24 h, 35°C >10,000 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
continued
494 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.67 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- TSB, 3% EtOH, 24 h, 37°C 10,000–13,000 Rota et al. (2004)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 11,000 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Shigella fl exneri Bac- TSB, 3% EtOH, 24 h, 37°C 20,000 Rota et al. (2004)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- TSB, 3% EtOH, 24 h, 29°C 10,000–15,000 Rota et al. (2004)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 24 h, 37°C 1250 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Actinomyces viscosus Bac+ HS, 16–24, 37°C >6000 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ TSB, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 10 Panizzi et al. (1993)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 750 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 800 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ Cited 1250 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriae Bac+ Cited 1250 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Enterococcus faecalis Bac+ MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Lactobacillus sp. Bac+ MRS, cited 5 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSB, 3% EtOH, 24 h, 37°C 7000–10,000 Rota et al. (2004)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSB, 24 h, 35°C 200 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Micrococcus fl avus Bac+ Cited 1250 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ MHB, cited 2.5–5 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Micrococcus sp. Bac+ NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 1500 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Micrococcus ureae Bac+ MHB, cited 5 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 1250 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ Cited 1250 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Sarcina sp. Bac+ NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 2000 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Sarcina ureae Bac+ MHB, cited 2.5 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TSB, 3% EtOH, 24 h, 37°C 30,000–50,000 Rota et al. (2004)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TSB, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 20 Panizzi et al. (1993)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TSB, 24 h, 35°C 400 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 1% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 495<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C >900 Angioni et al. (2004)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 1000 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited 1250 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 10,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 12,500 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ MHB, cited 5 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ NB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C >900 Angioni et al. (2004)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ Cited 1250 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Streptococcus D Bac+ MHB, cited 2.5–5 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Streptococcus micros Bac+ MHB, cited 5 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ Cited 625 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Streptococcus sanguinis Bac+ HS, 16–24, 37°C >6000 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Streptococcus sobrinus Bac+ HS, 16–24, 37°C >6000 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Absidia glauca Fungi Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Aspergillus chevalieri Fungi Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Aspergillus clavatus Fungi Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 8 h, 20°C, spore germ. inh. 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi MYB, 72 h, 26°C 12,500 Shin (2003)<br />
Aspergillus giganteus Fungi Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi YES broth, 10 d 12% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi MYB, 72 h, 26°C 12,500 Shin (2003)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi YES broth, 10 d 14% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus oryzae Fungi Cited 250 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Aspergillus oryzae Fungi Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 8 h, 20°C, spore germ. inh. 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Aspergillus repens Fungi Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Cephalosporium sacchari Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C 20,000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
continued
496 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.67 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Ceratocystis paradoxa Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C 4000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Cladosporium herbarum Fungi Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Curvularia lunata Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C 20,000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Epidermophyton fl occosum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C 625–1250 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
Epidermophyton fl occosum Fungi Cited >4000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Fusarium culmorum Fungi YES broth, 10 d 0% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Fusarium moniliforme var. subglutinans Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C 20,000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Helminthosporium sacchari Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C 20,000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Microsporum canis Fungi MBA, Tween 80, 10 d, 30°C 300– >300 Perrucci et al. (1994)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi MBA, Tween 80, 10 d, 30°C >300 Perrucci et al. (1994)<br />
Mucor hiemalis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi Cited 1000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor racemosus Fungi Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Mucor racemosus f. racemosus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 6400 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 12,500 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium liliacinum Fungi Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Penicillium rubrum Fungi Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Physalospora tucumanensis Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C 20,000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Rhizopus 66-81-2 Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus arrhizus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus chinensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus circinans Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus japonicus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus kazanensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Rhizopus oryzae Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 497<br />
Rhizopus pymacus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 25,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Rhizopus stolonifer Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus tritici Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Sclerotium rolfsii Fungi OA, EtOH, 6 d, 20°C 4000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Scopulariopsis brevicaulis Fungi Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Syncephalastrum racemosum Fungi Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Trichophyton interdigitale Fungi Cited >4000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C 300–625 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C 900 Angioni et al. (2004)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Cited 1000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 10,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida mycoderma Yeast Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida paraspilosis Yeast Cited 1000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida pelliculosa Yeast Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Geotrichum asteroides Yeast Cited 4000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Geotrichum c<strong>and</strong>idum Yeast Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Hansenula sp. Yeast Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Saccharomyces carlsbergensis Yeast Cited 4000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast SDB, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 5 Panizzi et al. (1993)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 88% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 2000 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Schizosaccharomyces pombe Yeast MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 86% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Torula utilis Yeast MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 2% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGB, 18 h, 37°C 11,300 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ TGB, 18 h, 37°C 11,300 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast YPB, 24 h, 20°C 2800 Schelz et al. (2006)
498 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.68<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Rosemary Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Activity Ref.<br />
Aerobacter tumefaciens Bac- Cited Disk, 20,000 NG Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 ++ Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited Disk, 20,000 NG to +++ Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Haemophilus infl uenza Bac- Cited Disk, 20,000 NG Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Neisseria sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Peptobacterium carotovorum Bac- Cited Disk, 20,000 +++ Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- Cited Disk, 20,000 +++ Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited Disk, 20,000 +++ Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Pseudomonas pisi Bac- Cited Disk, 20,000 +++ Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Pseudomonas tabaci Bac- Cited Disk, 20,000 +++ Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Shigella sonnei Bac- Cited Disk, 20,000 +++ Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Xanthomonas versicolor Bac- Cited Disk, 20,000 +++ Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ Cited Disk, 20,000 NG Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Bacillus subtilis var. aterrimus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheriae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Corynebacterium fascians Bac+ Cited Disk, 20,000 +++ Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Lactobacillus sp. Bac+ MRS, cited Disk, 20,000? ++ Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ MHB, cited Disk, 20,000? ++ Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Micrococcus ureae Bac+ MHB, cited Disk, 20,000? +++ Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Mycobacterium avium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd ++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Pneumococcus sp. Bac+ Cited Disk, 20,000 NG Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Sarcina ureae Bac+ MHB, cited Disk, 20,000? ++ Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited Disk, 20,000 NG Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ MHB, cited Disk, 20,000? +++ Pellecuer et al. (1980)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 499<br />
Streptococcus aegui Bac+ Cited Disk, 20,000 NG Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Streptococcus D Bac+ MHB, cited Disk, 20,000? ++ Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ Cited Disk, 20,000 NG Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Streptococcus haemolyticus Bac+ Cited Disk, 20,000 NG Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus sp. Bac+ Cited Disk, 20,000 NG Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi Bread, 14 d, 25°C 30,000 +++ Suhr <strong>and</strong> Nielsen (2003)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Botrytis cinera Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Colletotrichum gleosporoides Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Endomyces fi lbuliger Fungi Bread, 14 d, 25°C 30,000 +++ Suhr <strong>and</strong> Nielsen (2003)<br />
Eurotium amstelodami Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium herbarum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium repens Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium repens Fungi Bread, 14 d, 25°C 30,000 +++ Suhr <strong>and</strong> Nielsen (2003)<br />
Eurotium rubrum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Fusarium moniliforme Fungi Cited Disk, 20,000 NG Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Fusarium solani Fungi Cited Disk, 20,000 NG Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Ophiobolus graminis Fungi Cited Disk, 20,000 NG Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Penicillium corylophilum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 ++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Penicillium corylophilum Fungi Bread, 14 d, 25°C 30,000 +++ Suhr <strong>and</strong> Nielsen (2003)<br />
Penicillium roqueforti Fungi Bread, 14 d, 25°C 30,000 +++ Suhr <strong>and</strong> Nielsen (2003)<br />
Pythium ultimum Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Rhizoctonia solani Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Cited Disk, 20,000 NG Hethenyi et al. (1989)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast Cited Disk, 20,000 NG Hethenyi et al. (1989)
500 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.69<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Star Anise Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Inhibition Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Aeromonas hydrophila Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Alcaligenes faecalis Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Beneckea natriegens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Citrobacter freundii Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Erwinia carotovora Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 2000 18.5 Singh et al. (2006)<br />
Flavobacterium suaveolens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Moraxella sp. Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 6.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 2000 20.3 Singh et al. (2006)<br />
Salmonella pullorum Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 2000 30.1 Singh et al. (2006)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 5.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 9 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus cereus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 2000 0 Singh et al. (2006)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 501<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 6.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 2000 26.2 Singh et al. (2006)<br />
Brevibacterium linens Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Brochotrix thermosphacta Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Clostridium sporogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Leuconostoc cremoris Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 10 (h), 2000 0 Singh et al. (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 9 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Brettanomyces anomalus Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 8.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida lipolytica Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 7 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Debaryomyces hansenii Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Geotrichum c<strong>and</strong>idum Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Hansenula anomala Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kloeckera apiculata Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 8 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kluyveromyces fragilis Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Lodderomyces elongisporus Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Metchnikowia pulcherrima Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Pichia membranaefaciens Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Rhodotorula rubra Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Torula glabrata Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)
502 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.70<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Star Anise Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Epidermophyton fl occosum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C 300–625 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C 300–625 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C 300–625 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
TABLE 12.71<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Star Anise Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Activity Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Neisseria sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheriae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 + Singh et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 ++ Singh et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 +++ Singh et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus terreus Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 +++ Singh et al. (2006)<br />
Fusarium graminearum Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 +++ Singh et al. (2006)<br />
Fusarium moniliforme Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 NG Singh et al. (2006)<br />
Penicillium citrinum Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 + Singh et al. (2006)<br />
Penicillium viridicatum Fungi CDA, 6 d 12, 6000 ++ Singh et al. (2006)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 503<br />
TABLE 12.72<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Sweet Orange Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Inhibition Zone in mm Ref.<br />
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Aeromonas hydrophila Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Alcaligenes faecalis Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Beneckea natriegens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- CAB, 24 h, 42°C Disk, 10,000 0 Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- TSA, 24 h, 42°C 4 (h), 25,000 4 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Citrobacter freundii Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- MHA, 24 h, 30°C 6, 15,000 6 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Erwinia carotovora Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 5 (h), -30,000 0 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 4 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHA, 24 h, 30°C 6, 15,000 8 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited 15, 2500 16 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C Disk, 10,000 18 Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 19.5 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 20 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Flavobacterium suaveolens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 10 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 2 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Moraxella sp. Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Neisseria perfl ava Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 3 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
continued
504 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.72 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Inhibition Zone in mm Ref.<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 0 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 0 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited 15, 2500 2 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHA, 24 h, 30°C 6, 15,000 6 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Pseudomonas mangiferae indicae Bac- NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 0 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas mangiferae indicae Bac- NA, 24 h, 28°C 6, sd 9 Kindra <strong>and</strong> Satyanarayana (1978)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 4 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Salmonella paratyphi Bac- NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 14 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Salmonella paratyphi Bac- NA, 24 h, 28°C 6, sd 19 Kindra <strong>and</strong> Satyanarayana (1978)<br />
Salmonella pullorum Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Salmonella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 15 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 24 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Serratia sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 2 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Shigella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 13 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Vibrio cholera Bac- NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 13 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Vibrio cholera Bac- NA, 24 h, 28°C 6, sd 13 Kindra <strong>and</strong> Satyanarayana (1978)<br />
Xanthomonas campestris Bac- NA, 24 h, 28°C 6, sd 20.5 Kindra <strong>and</strong> Satyanarayana (1978)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus anthracis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 28°C 6, sd 23 Kindra <strong>and</strong> Satyanarayana (1978)<br />
Bacillus cereus Bac+ BHA, 24 h, 30°C Disk, 10,000 36 Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Bacillus mesentericus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 2 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus mycoides Bac+ NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 0 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Bacillus mycoides Bac+ NA, 24 h, 28°C 6, sd 17 Kindra <strong>and</strong> Satyanarayana (1978)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 505<br />
Bacillus pumilus Bac+ NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 0 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Bacillus pumilus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 28°C 6, sd 16 Kindra <strong>and</strong> Satyanarayana (1978)<br />
Bacillus sp. Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 7 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 10 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 10.3 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 14 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 19 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 28°C 6, sd 21.5 Kindra <strong>and</strong> Satyanarayana (1978)<br />
Brevibacterium linens Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Brochotrix thermosphacta Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 8 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Clostridium sporogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 22 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Leuconostoc cremoris Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 7.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 4 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 10 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ LSA, 24 h, 37°C Disk, 10,000 >90 Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 23.5 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 0 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 36–48 h, 37°C 6, sd 0 Garg <strong>and</strong> Garg (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 4 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 6 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHA, 24 h, 37°C 6, 15,000 17 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 6 (h), pure 20.6 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
continued
506 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.72 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Inhibition Zone in mm Ref.<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ BHA, 24 h, 37°C Disk, 10,000 46 Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 5 (h), –30,000 0 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 12 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Streptococcus viridans Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Streptomyces venezuelae Bac+ SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Alternaria porri Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 10 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Alternaria solani Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 13 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 8 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, 48 h, 28°C 5, 5000 6 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 28 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cicer Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 10 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Helminthosporium sativum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 18 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Nigrospora panici Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 25 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 7 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi SDA, 8 d, 30°C 6 (h), pure 0 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 507<br />
Brettanomyces anomalus Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 0 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 13 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 18 h, 30°C 6 (h), pure 22.5 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 5 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida lipolytica Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 7 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 6 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus rhodobenhani Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Debaryomyces hansenii Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Geotrichum c<strong>and</strong>idum Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Hansenula anomala Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kloeckera apiculata Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kluyveromyces fragilis Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Lodderomyces elongisporus Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Metchnikowia pulcherrima Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Pichia membranaefaciens Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Rhodotorula rubra Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast NA, 24 h, 20°C 5 (h), -30,000 7–8 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 0 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 18 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Torula glabrata Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 10 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)
508 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.73<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Sweet Orange Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, pH 7 2000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C >1000 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 10,000 Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, 24–72 h, 37°C 93% inh. 10,000 Dabbah et al. (1970)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGB, 18 h, 37°C >11,300 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Helicobacter pylori Bac- Cited, 20 h, 37°C 65.1 Weseler et al. (2005)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C >50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, 24–72 h, 37°C 87% inh. 10,000 Dabbah et al. (1970)<br />
Salmonella heidelberg Bac- NB, 1–2 d, 35–37°C 90% inh., 1000 Dabbah et al. (1970)<br />
Salmonella montevideo Bac- NB, 1–2 d, 35–37°C 90% inh., 1000 Dabbah et al. (1970)<br />
Salmonella oranienburg Bac- NB, 1–2 d, 35–37°C 90% inh., 1000 Dabbah et al. (1970)<br />
Salmonella schottmuelleri Bac- NA, pH 7 1000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Salmonella senftenberg Bac- NB, 24–72 h, 37°C 93% inh. 10,000 Dabbah et al. (1970)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- NB, 1–2 d, 35–37°C 90% inh., 1000 Dabbah et al. (1970)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, pH 7 >2000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 24 h, 37°C 1250 Rossi et al. (2007)<br />
Bacillus cereus Bac+ BHA, 24 h, 30°C >40,000 Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, pH 7 2000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C 500 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Bac+ NA, pH 7 1000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ LSA, 24 h, 37°C 2500 Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Micrococcus sp. Bac+ NA, pH 7 1000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 800 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 12,500 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C 500 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NB, 24–72 h, 37°C 10,000 Dabbah et al. (1970)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 509<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ TGB, 18 h, 37°C >11,300 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, pH 7 1000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Aspergillus awamorii Fungi PDA, pH 4.5 2000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, pH 4.5 2000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 8 h, 20°C, spore germ. inh. 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, pH 4.5 2000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 50,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi YES broth, 10 d 0% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi YES broth, 10 d 34% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus oryzae Fungi Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 8 h, 20°C, spore germ. inh. 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Botrytis cinera Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 7 d, 24°C 4% inh. 1000 Bouchra et al. (2003)<br />
Cephalosporium sacchari Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C >20,000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Ceratocystis paradoxa Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C 20,000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Curvularia lunata Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C 20,000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Epidermophyton fl occosum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C >1250 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
Fusarium culmorum Fungi YES broth, 10 d 84% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Fusarium moniliforme var. subglutinans Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C >20,000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Geotrichum citri-aurantii Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 7 d, 24°C 7% inh. 1000 Bouchra et al. (2003)<br />
Helminthosporium sacchari Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C 20,000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Mucor hiemalis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor racemosus Fungi Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Mucor racemosus f. racemosus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 12,500 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi Cited 500 Okazaki <strong>and</strong> Oshima (1953)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 25,000 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi SDB, 5 d, 20°C, MIC = ED50 1000–2400 Caccioni et al. (1998)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 7 d, 24°C 32% inh. 1000 Bouchra et al. (2003)<br />
Penicillium italicum Fungi SDB, 5 d, 20°C, MIC = ED50 3000–5500 Caccioni et al. (1998)<br />
continued
510 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.73 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Physalospora tucumanensis Fungi OA, EtOH, 3 d, 20°C 4000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Phytophthora citrophthora Fungi PDA, Tween 20, 7 d, 24°C 13% inh. 1000 Bouchra et al. (2003)<br />
Rhizopus 66-81-2 Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus arrhizus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus chinensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus circinans Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus japonicus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus kazanensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus oryzae Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus pymacus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi NB, Tween 20, 8 d, 30°C 3200 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
Rhizopus stolonifer Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus tritici Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C >1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Sclerotium rolfsii Fungi OA, EtOH, 6 d, 20°C 20,000 Narasimba Rao et al. (1971)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C >1250 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C >1250 Janssen et al. (1988)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NB, Tween 20, 18 h, 37°C 1600 Yousef <strong>and</strong> Tawil (1980)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C 500 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast PDA, pH 4.5 1000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast YPB, 24 h, 20°C 2800 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Torula utilis Yeast PDA, pH 4.5 1000 Subba et al. (1967)<br />
Zygosaccharomyces mellis Yeast PDA, pH 4.5 1000 Subba et al. (1967)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 511<br />
TABLE 12.74<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Sweet Orange Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Activity Ref.<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- CAB, 24 h, 42°C Disk, 10,000 +++ Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 + Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C Disk, 10,000 +++ Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Neisseria sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Bacillus cereus Bac+ BHA, 24 h, 30°C Disk, 10,000 +++ Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheriae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ LSA, 24 h, 37°C Disk, 10,000 +++ Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ BHA, 24 h, 37°C Disk, 10,000 +++ Fisher <strong>and</strong> Phillips (2006)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi Bread, 14 d, 25°C 30,000 NG Suhr <strong>and</strong> Nielsen (2003)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Botrytis cinera Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Colletotrichum gleosporoides Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Endomyces fi lbuliger Fungi Bread, 14 d, 25°C 30,000 +++ Suhr <strong>and</strong> Nielsen (2003)<br />
Eurotium amstelodami Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium herbarum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium repens Fungi Bread, 14 d, 25°C 30,000 + Suhr <strong>and</strong> Nielsen (2003)<br />
Eurotium repens Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium rubrum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 +++ Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Penicillium corylophilum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 + Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Penicillium corylophilum Fungi Bread, 14 d, 25°C 30,000 +++ Suhr <strong>and</strong> Nielsen (2003)<br />
Penicillium roqueforti Fungi Bread, 14 d, 25°C 30,000 +++ Suhr <strong>and</strong> Nielsen (2003)<br />
Pythium ultimum Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Rhizoctonia solani Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)
512 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.75<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Tea Tree Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Inhibition Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 14 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 5 (h), -30,000 17 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 5 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 20 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 7 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus MRSA Bac+ MHA, 24 h, 37°C 12.7, 30,000 21–33 Carson et al. (1995)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 5 (h), -30,000 14 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Alternaria porri Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 15.3 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi SDA, 72 h, 26°C 8, 25,000 9 Shin (2003)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, 48 h, 28°C 5, 5000 7 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDA, 72 h, 26°C 8, 25,000 8 Shin (2003)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cicer Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 10.5 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 11 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast NA, 24 h, 20°C 5 (h), -30,000 19–21 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 13 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Schizosaccharomyces pombe Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 20 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Torula utilis Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 47 Hili et al. (1997)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 513<br />
TABLE 12.76<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Tea Tree Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Mycoplasma fermentans Bac Cited 100–600 Furneri et al. (2006)<br />
Mycoplasma hominis Bac Cited 600–1200 Furneri et al. (2006)<br />
Mycoplasma pneumoniae Bac Cited 100 Furneri et al. (2006)<br />
Acinetobacter baumannii Bac- HIB, Tween 80, 24 h, 35°C 600–10,000 Hammer et al. (1996)<br />
Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans Bac- HS, 72 h, 37°C 1100 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Aeromonas sobria Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 2500 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Bacteroides sp. Bac- VC, Tween 80 300–5000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Citrobacter freundii Bac- ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 5000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Coliform bacilli Bac- MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 10,000–20,000 Banes-Marshall et al. (2001)<br />
Coliform bacilli Bac- BA, 24 h, 37°C 5000 Banes-Marshall et al. (2001)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 2500 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Enterococcus faecalis Bac- ISB, Tween 20, 24 h, 37°C 5000–7500 Griffin et al. (2000)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- ISB, Tween 20, 24 h, 37°C 2000 Griffin et al. (2000)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 2500 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- ISB, Tween 80, 16–20 h, 37°C 2500 Gustafson et al. (1998)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 2500 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 28% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGB, 18 h, 37°C 5600 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Fusobacterium nucleatum Bac- HS, 72 h, 37°C >6000 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Fusobacterium sp. Bac- VC, Tween 80 600–2500 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Gardnerella vaginalis Bac- VC, Tween 80 600 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- HIB, Tween 80, 24 h, 35°C 1200–50,000 Hammer et al. (1996)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 2500 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- ISB, Tween 20, 24 h, 37°C 3000 Griffin et al. (2000)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 5000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Porphyromonas gingivalis Bac- HS, 72 h, 37°C 1100 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Prevotella sp. Bac- VC, Tween 80 300–2500 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
continued
514 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.76 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Proteus mirabilis Bac- ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 2500 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- ISB, Tween 20, 24 h, 37°C 3000 Griffin et al. (2000)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MCA, 24 h, 37 >20,000 Banes-Marshall et al. (2001)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C >40,000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- ISB, Tween 20, 24 h, 37°C 10,000– >20,000 Griffin et al. (2000)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 10,000–80,000 Banes-Marshall et al. (2001)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- HIB, Tween 80, 24 h, 35°C 20,000–50,000 Hammer et al. (1996)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHB, 18–24 h, 37°C 40,000 Papadopoulos et al. (2006)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 5000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 75% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Pseudomonas fl uorescens Bac- MHB, 18–24 h, 37°C 40,000 Papadopoulos et al. (2006)<br />
Pseudomonas putida Bac- ISB, Tween 20, 24 h, 37°C >20,000 Griffin et al. (2000)<br />
Pseudomonas putida Bac- MHB, 18–24 h, 37°C 10,000 Papadopoulos et al. (2006)<br />
Salmonella choleraesuis Bac- ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 2500 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 5000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- ISB, Tween 20, 24 h, 37°C 1000–3000 Griffin et al. (2000)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- HIB, Tween 80, 24 h, 35°C 2500–50,000 Hammer et al. (1996)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 5000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Shigella fl exneri Bac- ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 2500 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Actinomyces viscosus Bac+ HS, 16–24, 37°C 6000 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Anaerobic cocci Bac+ VC, Tween 80 600–2500 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Bacillus cereus Bac+ ISB, Tween 20, 24 h, 37°C 3000 Griffin et al. (2000)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 2500 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ ISB, Tween 20, 24 h, 37°C 3000 Griffin et al. (2000)<br />
Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriae Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 5000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ ISB, Tween 20, 24 h, 37°C 2000–3000 Griffin et al. (2000)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ HIB, Tween 80, 24 h, 35°C 600–20,000 Hammer et al. (1996)<br />
Enterococcus durans Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 1000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Enterococcus faecalis Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 1000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 515<br />
Enterococcus faecalis Bac+ MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 10,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Enterococcus faecalis Bac+ MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 80,000 Banes-Marshall et al. (2001)<br />
Enterococcus faecium Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 1000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Enterococcus faecium VRE Bac+ HIB, Tween 80, 18 h, 37°C 5000–10,000 Nelson (1997)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 2500 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ ISB, Tween 20, 24 h, 37°C 2000–3000 Griffin et al. (2000)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ HIB, Tween 80, 24 h, 35°C 600–5000 Hammer et al. (1996)<br />
Micrococcus sp. Bac+ HIB, Tween 80, 24 h, 35°C 600–5000 Hammer et al. (1996)<br />
Micrococcus varians Bac+ HIB, Tween 80, 24 h, 35°C 5000–10,000 Hammer et al. (1996)<br />
Mobiluncus sp. Bac+ VC, Tween 80 300–600 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Peptostreptococcus anaerobius Bac+ HS, 72 h, 37°C 2000 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Peptostreptococcus anaerobius Bac+ VC, Tween 80 600–2500 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Propionibacterium acnes Bac+ Agar, 24 h, 37°C 3100–6300 Raman et al. (1995)<br />
Propionibacterium acnes Bac+ ISB, Tween 20, 24 h, 37°C 5000 Griffin et al. (2000)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ BA, 24 h, 37°C 10,000 Banes-Marshall et al. (2001)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ HIB, Tween 80, 24 h, 35°C 1200–5000 Hammer et al. (1996)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ ISB, Tween 20, 24 h, 37°C 2000 Griffin et al. (2000)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 20,000 Banes-Marshall et al. (2001)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 2500 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 43% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 5000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 5000 Banes-Marshall et al. (2001)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Agar, 24 h, 37°C 6300–12,500 Raman et al. (1995)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus MRSA Bac+ BA, 24 h, 37°C 10,000 Banes-Marshall et al. (2001)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus MRSA Bac+ MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 20,000–40,000 Banes-Marshall et al. (2001)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus MRSA Bac+ ISB, Tween 20, 24 h, 37°C 2000–3000 Griffin et al. (2000)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus MRSA Bac+ HIB, Tween 80, 18 h, 37°C 2500 Nelson (1997)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus MRSA Bac+ Cited 2500 Carson <strong>and</strong> Messager (2005)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus MRSA Bac+ HIB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°c 2500–5000 Carson et al. (1995)<br />
Staphylococcus capitis Bac+ HIB, Tween 80, 24 h, 35°C 10,000–10,0000 Hammer et al. (1996)<br />
Staphylococcus capitis Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 1200–2500 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
continued
516 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.76 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ HIB, Tween 80, 24 h, 35°C 1200–40,000 Hammer et al. (1996)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 2500 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ ISB, Tween 20, 24 h, 37°C 5000 Griffin et al. (2000)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ TGB, 18 h, 37°C 5600 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ Agar, 24 h, 37°C 6300–12,500 Raman et al. (1995)<br />
Staphylococcus haemolyticus Bac+ HIB, Tween 80, 24 h, 35°C 10,000–40,000 Hammer et al. (1996)<br />
Staphylococcus haemolyticus Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 2500–5000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Staphylococcus hominis Bac+ HIB, Tween 80, 24 h, 35°C 10,000–40,000 Hammer et al. (1996)<br />
Staphylococcus hominis Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 1200 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Staphylococcus saprophyticus Bac+ HIB, Tween 80, 24 h, 35°C 20,000–30,000 Hammer et al. (1996)<br />
Staphylococcus saprophyticus Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 2500–5000 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Staphylococcus warneri Bac+ HIB, Tween 80, 24 h, 35°C 20,000–80,000 Hammer et al. (1996)<br />
Staphylococcus xylosus Bac+ HIB, Tween 80, 24 h, 35°C 10,000–30,000 Hammer et al. (1996)<br />
Staphylococcus xylosus Bac+ ISB, Tween 80, 20–24 h, 37°C 2500 Harkenthal et al. (1999)<br />
Streptococci beta-haemolytic Bac+ BA, 24 h, 37°C 1200–5000 Banes-Marshall et al. (2001)<br />
Streptococci beta-haemolytic Bac+ MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 80,000 Banes-Marshall et al. (2001)<br />
Streptococci beta-haemolytic Gp.D Bac+ MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 5000–20,000 Banes-Marshall et al. (2001)<br />
Streptococci, faecal Bac+ MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C >80,000 Banes-Marshall et al. (2001)<br />
Streptococci, faecal Bac+ BA, 24 h, 37°C 10,000 Banes-Marshall et al. (2001)<br />
Streptococcus equi Bac+ THB, Tween 80, 24 h, 35°C 1200 Carson et al. (1996)<br />
Streptococcus equisimilis Bac+ THB, Tween 80, 24 h, 35°C 1200 Carson et al. (1996)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ THB, Tween 80, 24 h, 35°C 1200 Carson et al. (1996)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 20,000 Banes-Marshall et al. (2001)<br />
Streptococcus sobrinus Bac+ HS, 16–24, 37°C 6000 Shapiro et al. (1994)<br />
Streptococcus sp. group G Bac+ THB, Tween 80, 24 h, 35°C 1200 Carson et al. (1996)<br />
Streptococcus zooepidemicus Bac+ THB, Tween 80, 24 h, 35°C 600 Carson et al. (1996)<br />
Alternaria alternata Fungi PDA, 7 d, 28°C 62% inh. 500 Feng <strong>and</strong> Zheng (2007)<br />
Alternaria sp. Fungi Cited data 160–1200 Carson et al. (2006)<br />
Alternaria sp. Fungi RPMI, Tween 80, 48 h, 30°C 160–1200 Carson <strong>and</strong> Riley (2002)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi Cited data 3100–7000 Carson et al. (2006)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 517<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi MYB, 72 h, 26°C 3120 Shin (2003)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi MA, Tween 20, 24 h, 30°C 4000–5000 Griffin et al. (2000)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi MA, Tween 20, 24 h, 30°C 5000–7000 Griffin et al. (2000)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi RPMI, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 600–1200 Carson <strong>and</strong> Riley (2002)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi RPMI, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 600–1200 Carson <strong>and</strong> Riley (2002)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi Cited data 160–4000 Carson et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi MA, Tween 20, 24 h, 30°C 3000–4000 Griffin et al. (2000)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi MYB, 72 h, 26°C 3120 Shin (2003)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi RPMI, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 600–1200 Carson <strong>and</strong> Riley (2002)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi YES broth, 10 d >10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi YES broth, 10 d 91% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Blastoschizomyces capitatus Fungi Cited data 2500 Carson et al. (2006)<br />
Cladosporium sp. Fungi RPMI, Tween 80, 72 h, 30°C 160–1200 Carson <strong>and</strong> Riley (2002)<br />
Cladosporium sp. Fungi Cited data 80–1200 Carson et al. (2006)<br />
Epidermophyton fl occosum Fungi RPMI, Tween 80, 96 h, 30°C 80–300 Carson <strong>and</strong> Riley (2002)<br />
Epidermophyton fl occosum Fungi Cited data 80–7000 Carson et al. (2006)<br />
Fusarium culmorum Fungi YES broth, 10 d 76% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Fusarium sp. Fungi Cited data 80–2500 Carson et al. (2006)<br />
Fusarium sp. Fungi RPMI, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 80–2500 Carson <strong>and</strong> Riley (2002)<br />
Malassezia sympodialis Fungi Cited data 160–1200 Carson et al. (2006)<br />
Microsporum canis Fungi Cited data 300–5000 Carson et al. (2006)<br />
Microsporum canis Fungi RPMI, Tween 80, 96 h, 30°C 40–300 Carson <strong>and</strong> Riley (2002)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi RPMI, Tween 80, 96 h, 30°C 160–300 Carson <strong>and</strong> Riley (2002)<br />
Penicillium sp. Fungi Cited data 300–600 Carson et al. (2006)<br />
Penicillium sp. Fungi RPMI, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 300–600 Carson <strong>and</strong> Riley (2002)<br />
Pleurotus ferulae Fungi SDA, 7 d, 25°C 72–82% inh. 1000 Angelini et al. (2008)<br />
Pleurotus nebrodensis Fungi SDA, 7 d, 25°C 64–88% inh. 1000 Angelini et al. (2008)<br />
Pleurotus nebrodensis Fungi SDA, 7 d, 25°C 83–88% inh. 1000 Angelini et al. (2008)<br />
Trichophyton interdigitale Fungi RPMI, Tween 80, 96 h, 30°C 80–300 Carson <strong>and</strong> Riley (2002)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi Cited data 1100–4400 Carson et al. (2006)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi MA, Tween 20, 24 h, 30°C 3000–4000 Griffin et al. (2000)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi RPMI, Tween 80, 96 h, 30°C 80–600 Carson <strong>and</strong> Riley (2002)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi MA, Tween 20, 24 h, 30°C 10,000 Banes-Marshall et al. (2001)<br />
continued
518 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.76 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi Cited data 300–6000 Carson et al. (2006)<br />
Trichophyton rubrum Fungi RPMI, Tween 80, 96 h, 30°C 80–300 Carson <strong>and</strong> Riley (2002)<br />
Trichophyton tonsurans Fungi Cited data 40–160 Carson et al. (2006)<br />
Trichophyton tonsurans Fungi RPMI, Tween 80, 96 h, 30°C 40–160 Carson <strong>and</strong> Riley (2002)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast RPMI, Tween 80, 48 h, 30°C 1250 Oliva et al. (2003)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast MEB, Tween 20, 24 h, 37 2000 Griffin et al. (2000)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast RPMI, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 2500 Mondello et al. (2006)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast MHB, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 2500–5000 Hammer et al. (1998)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 37% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 5000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 24 h, 37°C 5000–10,000 Banes-Marshall et al. (2001)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida capitatus Yeast RPMI, Tween 80, 48 h, 30°C 1250–2500 Oliva et al. (2003)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida famata Yeast SDA, 24 h, 37°C 2500 Banes-Marshall et al. (2001)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida glabrata Yeast MHB, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 1200–5000 Hammer et al. (1998)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida glabrata Yeast SDA, 24 h, 37°C 2500–5000 Banes-Marshall et al. (2001)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida glabrata Yeast RPMI, Tween 80, 48 h, 30°C 300–1250 Oliva et al. (2003)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida glabrata Yeast Cited data 300–8000 Carson et al. (2006)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida glabrata Yeast RPMI, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 600 Mondello et al. (2006)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida guilliermondii Yeast RPMI, Tween 80, 48 h, 30°C 125ß Oliva et al. (2003)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida incospigua Yeast RPMI, Tween 80, 48 h, 30°C 300 Oliva et al. (2003)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast RPMI, Tween 80, 48 h, 30°C 1250 Oliva et al. (2003)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast RPMI, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 2500 Mondello et al. (2006)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast SDA, 24 h, 37°C 5000 Banes-Marshall et al. (2001)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida lipolytica Yeast RPMI, Tween 80, 48 h, 30°C 600–1250 Oliva et al. (2003)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 519<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida lusitaniae Yeast RPMI, Tween 80, 48 h, 30°C 1250 Oliva et al. (2003)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida parapsilosis Yeast RPMI, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 1250 Mondello et al. (2006)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida parapsilosis Yeast MHB, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 2500–5000 Hammer et al. (1998)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida parapsilosis Yeast Cited data 300–5000 Carson et al. (2006)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida parapsilosis Yeast RPMI, Tween 80, 48 h, 30°C 600–1250 Oliva et al. (2003)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida sp. Yeast MHB, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 1200–5000 Hammer et al. (1998)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida sp. Yeast MHB, Tween 80, 24 h, 37°C 5000 Banes-Marshall et al. (2001)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast Cited data 1200–20,000 Carson et al. (2006)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast RPMI, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 600 Mondello et al. (2006)<br />
Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans Yeast Cited data 150–600 Carson et al. (2006)<br />
Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans Yeast RPMI, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 300 Mondello et al. (2006)<br />
Malassezia furfur Yeast MMA, Tween 20, 7 d 1200–2500 Hammer et al. (2000)<br />
Malassezia furfur Yeast Cited data 300–1200 Carson et al. (2006)<br />
Malassezia globosa Yeast MMA, Tween 20, 7 d 300–1200 Hammer et al. (2000)<br />
Malassezia obtusa Yeast MMA, Tween 20, 7 d 1200 Hammer et al. (2000)<br />
Malassezia slo<strong>of</strong>fi ae Yeast MMA, Tween 20, 7 d 1200–2500 Hammer et al. (2000)<br />
Malassezia sympodialis Yeast MMA, Tween 20, 7 d 160–2500 Hammer et al. (2000)<br />
Rhodotorula rubra Yeast Cited data 600 Carson et al. (2006)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast MEB, Tween 20, 24 h, 37°C 2000 Griffin et al. (2000)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast Cited data 2500 Carson et al. (2006)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast YPB, 24 h, 20°C 2800 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 69% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Schizosaccharomyces pombe Yeast MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 74% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Torula utilis Yeast MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 33% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Trichophyton tonsurans Yeast Cited data 1200–2200 Carson et al. (2006)
520 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.77<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Tea Tree Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Activity Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- BLA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 50 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Haemophilus infl uenzae Bac- MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 25 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Bacillus subtilis var. aterrimus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Mycobacterium avium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd NG Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 50 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd +++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Streptococcus pneumoniae Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 50 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 50 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Botrytis cinera Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Colletotrichum gleosporoides Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Pythium ultimum Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Rhizoctonia solani Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 521<br />
TABLE 12.78<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Thyme Oil Obtained in the Agar Diffusion Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Inhibition Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 19 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Aerobacter aerogenes Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Aeromonas hydrophila Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 22.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Alcaligenes faecalis Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 20 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Beneckea natriegens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 20 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- TSA, 24 h, 42°C 4 (h), 25,000 10.4 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Citrobacter freundii Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 21.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 25.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Erwinia carotovora Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 21.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 8.3 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 8 (h), pure 16 Fawzi (1991)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited 15, 2500 21 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 19.3 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 18 h, 37°C 5 (h), -30,000 26 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 27 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 22.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 41 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Flavobacterium suaveolens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 38 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 19 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Klebsiella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 12 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Moraxella sp. Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 24 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Neisseria perfl ava Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 3 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 16 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 20 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited 15, 2500 0 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
continued
522 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.78 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Inhibition Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C 8 (h), pure 8 Fawzi (1991)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 14 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 8.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 22.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 11.1 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Salmonella pullorum Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 26 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Salmonella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 10 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 4 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 20.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Serratia sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 5 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Shigella sp. Bac- Cited 15, 2500 8 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 23 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus cereus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 8 (h), pure 21 Fawzi (1991)<br />
Bacillus mesentericus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus sp. Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 26 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 12.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 25 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 33.2 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Brevibacterium linens Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 24.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Brochotrix thermosphacta Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 16 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Clostridium sporogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 16 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 18 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Lactobacillus sp. Bac+ MRS, cited 9, 20,000 25– >90 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Leuconostoc cremoris Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 0 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 6–20 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 10 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 32 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ MHA, cited 9, 20,000 40 Pellecuer et al. (1980)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 523<br />
Micrococcus ureae Bac+ MHA, cited 9, 20,000 40 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Sarcina ureae Bac+ MHA, cited 9, 20,000 >90 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C —, sd 0 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Lichtenstein (1956)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TSA, 24 h, 35°C 4 (h), 25,000 8.5 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 14 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C 8 (h), pure 19 Fawzi (1991)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 18 h, 37°C 5 (h), -30,000 24 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 25 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 29 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 33.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 51 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 16 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ MHA, cited 9, 20,000 40 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Streptococcus D Bac+ MHA, cited 9, 20,000 17– >90 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ ISA, 48 h, 25°C 4 (h), 10,000 19.5 Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie (1987)<br />
Streptococcus micros Bac+ MHA, cited 9, 20,000 >90 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Streptococcus viridans Bac+ Cited 15, 2500 3 Pizsolitto et al. (1975)<br />
Streptomyces venezuelae Bac+ SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 21 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Alternaria porri Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 26.6 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Alternaria solani Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 22 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 21 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi PDA, 48 h, 28°C 5, 5000 12 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 22 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SDA, 3 d, 30 8 (h), pure 35 Fawzi (1991)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cicer Fungi PDA, 72 h, 28°C 5, 5000 10.5 Pawar <strong>and</strong> Thaker (2007)<br />
Helminthosporium sativum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 20 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 22 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Nigrospora panici Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 16 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 17 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 14 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
continued
524 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.78 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Inhibition Zone (mm) Ref.<br />
Brettanomyces anomalus Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 31 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 14 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast TGA, 18–24 h, 37°C 9.5, 2000 14 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast SDA, 24 h, 37°C 8 (h), pure 37 Fawzi (1991)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast Cited, 18 h, 37°C 6, 2500 40.7 Janssen et al. (1986)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 61 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida krusei Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 13 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida lipolytica Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 18 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 12 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 25 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Cryptococcus rhodobenhani Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 14 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Debaryomyces hansenii Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 15 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Geotrichum c<strong>and</strong>idum Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 34 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Hansenula anomala Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 18 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kloeckera apiculata Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 19 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Kluyveromyces fragilis Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 17 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Lodderomyces elongisporus Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 16 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Metchnikowia pulcherrima Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 38 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Pichia membranaefaciens Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 34 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Rhodotorula rubra Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 21 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast NA, 24 h, 20°C 5 (h), -30,000 23–25 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast SMA, 2–7 d, 20°C sd 16 Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Liguori (1958)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 25 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 80 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Schizosaccharomyces pombe Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 69 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Torula glabrata Yeast MPA, 4 d, 30°C 5, 10% sol. sd 15 Conner <strong>and</strong> Beuchat (1984)<br />
Torula utilis Yeast NA, 24 h, 30°C Drop, 5000 67 Hili et al. (1997)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 525<br />
TABLE 12.79<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Thyme Oil Obtained in the Dilution Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Bacteria Bac 5% Glucose, 9 d, 37 500–1000 Buchholtz (1875)<br />
Acinetobacter baumannii Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 1200 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Aeromonas sobria Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 1200 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Bordetella bronchiseptica Bac- Cited 250 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Campylobacter jejuni Bac- TSB, 24 h, 42°C 400 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Enterococcus faecalis Bac- M17, 24 h, 20°C >10,000 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 1200 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGB, 18 h, 37°C 1500 Schelz et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSB, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 2 Panizzi et al. (1993)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, 16 h, 37°C 200 Lens-Lisbonne et al. (1987)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSB, 3% EtOH, 24 h, 37°C 3000–8000 Rota et al. (2004)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- LA, 18 h, 37°C 375–500 Remmal et al. (1993)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NB, 24 h, Tween 20, 37 400 Fawzi (1991)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C 500 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- Cited 500 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSB, 24 h, 35°C 500 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C 62.5 Al-Bayati (2008)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- TSB, 24 h, 37°C 700 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 75% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 750 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- MHB, 24 h, 36°C >10,000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli O157:H7 Bac- BHI, 48 h, 35°C >8000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli O157:H7 Bac- BHI, 48 h, 35°C 500 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli O157:H7 Bac- BHI, 48 h, 35°C 500 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Escherichia coli O157:H7 Bac- BHI, 48 h, 35°C 8000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Haemophilus infl uenza Bac- Cited 1000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Helicobacter pylori Bac- Cited, 20 h, 37°C 275.2 Weseler et al. (2005)<br />
continued
526 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.79 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 2500 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- MHB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C 500 Al-Bayati (2008)<br />
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bac- Cited 5000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Moraxella glucidolytica Bac- Cited 1000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Neisseria catarrhalis Bac- Cited 125 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Neisseria fl ava Bac- Cited 500 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Proteus mirabilis Bac- MHB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C 62.5 Al-Bayati (2008)<br />
Proteus vulgaris Bac- MHB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C 31.2 Al-Bayati (2008)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- TSB, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C >40 Panizzi et al. (1993)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MHB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C >500 Al-Bayati (2008)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, 24 h, Tween 20, 37°C >50,000 Fawzi (1991)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- MPB, DMSO, 40 h, 30°C 77% inh. 500 Hili et al. (1997)<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bac- NB, 16 h, 37°C 800 Lens-Lisbonne et al. (1987)<br />
Pseudomonas fl uorescens Bac- NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 1000 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Pseudomonas sp. Bac- TSB, 24 h, 37°C 1500 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- TSB, 24 h, 35°C 400 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Salmonella enteritidis Bac- TSB, 3% EtOH, 24 h, 37°C 4000–8000 Rota et al. (2004)<br />
Salmonella haddar Bac- LA, 18 h, 37°C 500 Remmal et al. (1993)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- MHB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C 250 Al-Bayati (2008)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C >20,000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- BHI, 48 h, 35°C 1000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- MHB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C 125 Al-Bayati (2008)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- BHI, 48 h, 35°C 2000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- TSB, 24 h, 37°C 300 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- BHI, 48 h, 35°C 4000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- BHI, 48 h, 35°C 500 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Salmonella typhimurium Bac- TSB, 3% EtOH, 24 h, 37°C 5000 Rota et al. (2004)<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 1250 Farag et al. (1989)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 527<br />
Serratia marcescens Bac- MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 2500 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Shigella fl exneri Bac- TSB, 3% EtOH, 24 h, 37°C 3000–8000 Rota et al. (2004)<br />
Yersinia enterocolitica Bac- TSB, 3% EtOH, 24 h, 29°C 3000–5000 Rota et al. (2004)<br />
Bacillus cereus Bac+ NB, 24 h, Tween 20, 37°C >50,000 Fawzi (1991)<br />
Bacillus cereus Bac+ MHB, DMSO, 24 h, 37°C 15.6 Al-Bayati (2008)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ LA, 18 h, 37°C 375–500 Remmal et al. (1993)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ TSB, Tween 80, 48 h, 35°C 2 Panizzi et al. (1993)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 250 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Bacillus subtilis Bac+ Cited 500 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Brochotrix thermosphacta Bac+ M17, 24 h, 20°C 2500 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriae Bac+ Cited 125 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Corynebacterium sp. Bac+ TGB, 18–24 h, 37°C 500 Morris et al. (1979)<br />
Enterococcus faecalis Bac+ MHA, Tween 20, 48 h, 35°C 5000 Hammer et al. (1999)<br />
Enterococcus faecium VRE Bac+ HIB, Tween 80, 18 h, 37°C 500–10,000 Nelson (1997)<br />
Lactobacillus delbrueckii Bac+ MRS, 24 h, 37°C >10,000 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Lactobacillus plantarum Bac+ MRS, 24 h, 30°C >10,000 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Lactobacillus sp. Bac+ MRS, cited 310–620 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Lactococcus garvieae Bac+ M17, 24 h, 20°C >10,000 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis Bac+ M17, 24 h, 20°C >10,000 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSB, 3% EtOH, 24 h, 37°C 8000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ BHI, 48 h, 35°C >8000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSB, 24 h, 37°C 1000 Di Pasqua et al. (2005)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ BHI, 48 h, 35°C 1000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSB, 24 h, 35°C 200 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ TSB, 10 d, 4°C 200 Smith-Palmer et al. (1998)<br />
Listeria monocytogenes Bac+ BHI, 48 h, 35°C 2000 Oussalah et al. (2006)<br />
Micrococcus fl avus Bac+ Cited 500 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ MHB, cited 150 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Micrococcus sp. Bac+ NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 250 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Micrococcus ureae Bac+ MHB, cited 150 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
continued
528 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.79 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Mycobacterium phlei Bac+ NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 125 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Sarcina lutea Bac+ Cited 250 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Sarcina sp. Bac+ NA, 1–3 d, 30°C 125 Farag et al. (1989)<br />
Sarcina ureae Bac+ MHB, cited 78 Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ TSB, 3% EtOH, 24 h, 37°C
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 529<br />
Alternaria alternata Fungi PDA, 7 d, 28°C 62% inh. 500 Feng <strong>and</strong> Zheng (2007)<br />
Alternaria citri Fungi PDA, 8 d, 22°C 500 Arras <strong>and</strong> Usai (2001)<br />
Aspergillus chevalieri Fungi Cited 250 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Aspergillus clavatus Fungi Cited 1000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi Cited 1000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 7–14 d, 28°C 250 Soliman <strong>and</strong> Badeaa (2002)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 2500 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi PDA, 8 h, 20°C, spore germ. inh. 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi CA, 7 d, 28°C 74–76% inh. 500 Kumar et al. (2007)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus var. columnaris Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 2500 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 2500 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus giganteus Fungi Cited 1000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi Cited 1000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi SB, 72 h, Tween 20, 37°C 200 Fawzi (1991)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 2500–5000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi YES broth, 10 d -96% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi PDA, 7–14 d, 28°C 500 Soliman <strong>and</strong> Badeaa (2002)<br />
Aspergillus ochraceus Fungi YES broth, 10 d -92% inh. 10,000 Lis-Balchin et al. (1998)<br />
Aspergillus oryzae Fungi Cited 2000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 7–14 d, 28°C 500 Soliman <strong>and</strong> Badeaa (2002)<br />
Aspergillus parasiticus Fungi PDA, 8 h, 20°C, spore germ. inh. 50–100 Thompson (1986)<br />
Aspergillus repens Fungi Cited 250 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Botrytis cinera Fungi PDA, 8 d, 22°C 500 Arras <strong>and</strong> Usai (2001)<br />
Cladosporium cladosporoides Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 1250–2500 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Cladosporium herbarum Fungi Cited 1000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Epidermophyton fl occosum Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C
530 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.79 (continued)<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions MIC Ref.<br />
Microsporum canis Fungi MBA, Tween 80, 10 d, 30°C 12.5– >300 Perrucci et al. (1994)<br />
Microsporum canis Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 1250–2500 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 1250–2500 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi MBA, Tween 80, 10 d, 30°C 25– >300 Perrucci et al. (1994)<br />
Mucor hiemalis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 100 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor mucedo Fungi Cited 1000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Mucor racemosus f. racemosus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C >10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum Fungi Cited 1000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Penicillium digitatum Fungi PDA, 8 d, 22°C 1000 Arras <strong>and</strong> Usai (2001)<br />
Penicillium frequentans Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 2500 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Penicillium italicum Fungi PDA, 8 d, 22°C 1000 Arras <strong>and</strong> Usai (2001)<br />
Penicillium lanosum Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 2500 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Penicillium liliacinum Fungi Cited 500 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Penicillium rubrum Fungi Cited 1000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Rhizopus 66-81-2 Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus arrhizus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus chinensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus circinans Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus japonicus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus kazanensis Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 1000 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus nigricans Fungi Cited 500 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Rhizopus oryzae Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus pymacus Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C >10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Rhizopus stolonifer Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Rhizopus tritici Fungi PDA, 5 d, 27°C 500 Thompson <strong>and</strong> Cannon (1986)<br />
Scopulariopsis brevicaulis Fungi Cited 1000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Scopulariopsis brevicaulis Fungi RPMI, 1.5% EtOH, 7 d, 30°C 10,000 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Syncephalastrum racemosum Fungi Cited 500 Pellecuer et al. (1976)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 531<br />
Trichophyton interdigitale Fungi Cited 1000 Pellecuer et al. (1976)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi SA, Tween 80, 21 d, 20°C
532 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.80<br />
Inhibitory Data <strong>of</strong> Thyme Oil Obtained in the Vapor Phase Test<br />
Microorganism MO Class Conditions Activity Ref.<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Escherichia coli Bac- BLA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 12.5 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Haemophilus infl uenzae Bac- MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 3.13 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Neisseria sp. Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Salmonella typhi Bac- NA, 24 h, 37°C sd ++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Bacillus megaterium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Bacillus subtilis var. aterrimus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd ++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Corynebacterium diphtheriae Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Lactobacillus sp. Bac+ MRS, cited Disk, 20,000 ? ++ Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Micrococcus luteus Bac+ MHB, cited Disk, 20,000 ? ++ Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Micrococcus ureae Bac+ MHB, cited Disk, 20,000 ? ++ Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Mycobacterium avium Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd + Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Sarcina ureae Bac+ MHB, cited Disk, 20,000 ? + Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd ++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 6.25–12.5 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis Bac+ MHB, cited Disk, 20,000 ? ++ Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Streptococcus D Bac+ MHB, cited Disk, 20,000 ? ++ Pellecuer et al. (1980)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus faecalis Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C sd ++ Maruzzella <strong>and</strong> Sicurella (1960)<br />
Streptococcus pneumoniae Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 3.13–6.25 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)<br />
Streptococcus pyogenes Bac+ MHA, 18 h, 37°C MIC air 3.13–6.25 Inouye et al. (2001)<br />
Alternaria alternata Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 78 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 NG Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi Bread, 14 d, 25°C 30,000 +++ Suhr <strong>and</strong> Nielsen (2003)<br />
Aspergillus fl avus Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 156–312 Tullio et al. (2006)
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 533<br />
Aspergillus fumigatus Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 78–312 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 NG Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Aspergillus niger Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 78–156 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Botrytis cinera Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Cladosporium cladosporoides Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 78 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Colletotrichum gleosporoides Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 + Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Endomyces fi lbuliger Fungi Bread, 14 d, 25°C 30,000 +++ Suhr <strong>and</strong> Nielsen (2003)<br />
Eurotium amstelodami Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 NG Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium herbarum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 NG Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium repens Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 NG Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Eurotium repens Fungi Bread, 14 d, 25°C 30,000 NG Suhr <strong>and</strong> Nielsen (2003)<br />
Eurotium rubrum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 NG Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 + Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Fusarium oxysporum Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 156 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Microsporum canis Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 78–156 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Microsporum gypseum Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 78 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Mucor sp. Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 156 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Penicillium corylophilum Fungi WFA, 42 d, 25°C Disk, 50,000 NG Guynot et al. (2003)<br />
Penicillium corylophilum Fungi Bread, 14 d, 25°C 30,000 +++ Suhr <strong>and</strong> Nielsen (2003)<br />
Penicillium frequentans Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 156 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Penicillium lanosum Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 312 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Penicillium roqueforti Fungi Bread, 14 d, 25°C 30,000 +++ Suhr <strong>and</strong> Nielsen (2003)<br />
Pythium ultimum Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 +++ Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Rhizoctonia solani Fungi PDA, 3 d, 25°C 1000 + Lee et al. (2007)<br />
Rhizopus sp. Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 312 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Scopulariopsis brevicaulis Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 78 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes Fungi RPMI, 7 d, 30°C MIC air 39–78 Tullio et al. (2006)<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans Yeast NA, 24 h, 37°C ~20,000 NG Kellner <strong>and</strong> Kober (1954)
534 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
12.2 RESULTS<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> antimicrobial testing <strong>of</strong> the 28 essential oils listed in the European Pharmacopoeia<br />
6th edition are shown in Tables 12.1 through 12.80. Although literature is not fully covered, the<br />
quantity <strong>of</strong> available information was in part unexpected.<br />
ANISE OIL, ANISI AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: <strong>Essential</strong> oil obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the dry ripe fruits <strong>of</strong> Pimpinella<br />
anisum L.<br />
BITTER-FENNEL FRUIT OIL, FOENICULI AMARI FRUCTUS AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: <strong>Essential</strong> oil obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the ripe fruits <strong>of</strong> Foeniculum vulgare<br />
Miller, ssp. vulgare var. vulgare.<br />
Content: fenchone: 12–25%, trans-anethole: 55–75%.<br />
CARAWAY OIL, CARVI AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: <strong>Essential</strong> oil obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the dry fruits <strong>of</strong> Carum carvi L.<br />
CASSIA OIL, CINNAMOMI CASSIA AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: Cassia oil is obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the leaves <strong>and</strong> young branches <strong>of</strong><br />
Cinnamomum cassia Blume (Cinnamomum aromaticum Nees).<br />
CEYLON CINNAMON BARK OIL, CINNAMOMI ZEYLANICII CORTICIS AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: Ceylon cinnamon bark oil is obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the bark <strong>of</strong> the shoots <strong>of</strong><br />
Cinnamomum zeylanicum Nees (Cinnamomum verum J.S. Presl.).<br />
CEYLON CINNAMON LEAF OIL, CINNAMOMI ZEYLANICI FOLII AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: <strong>Essential</strong> oil obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the leaves <strong>of</strong> Cinnamomum verum J.S.<br />
Presl.<br />
CITRONELLA OIL, CITRONELLAE AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: <strong>Essential</strong> oil obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the fresh or partially dried aerial parts <strong>of</strong><br />
Cymbopogon winterianus Jowitt.<br />
CLARY SAGE OIL, SALVIAE SCLAERAE AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: <strong>Essential</strong> oil obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the fresh or dried flowering stems <strong>of</strong><br />
Salvia sclarea L.<br />
CLOVE OIL, CARYOPHYLLI FLORIS AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: Clove oil is obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the dried flower buds <strong>of</strong> Syzygium aromaticum<br />
(L.) Merill et L. M. Perry (Eugenia caryophyllus C. Spreng. Bull. et Harr.).
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 535<br />
CORIANDER OIL, CORIANDRI AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: <strong>Essential</strong> oil obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the fruits <strong>of</strong> Cori<strong>and</strong>rum sativum L.<br />
DWARF-PINE OIL, PINI PUMILIONIS AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: <strong>Essential</strong> oil obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the fresh needles, twigs, <strong>and</strong> branches <strong>of</strong><br />
Pinus mugo ssp. mugo ZENARI <strong>and</strong>/or Pinus mugo ssp. pumilio (HAENKE) FRANCO.<br />
Pinus mugo Turra [Pinus mugo var. pumilio (Haenke) Zenari], plant part: leaves <strong>and</strong> twigs.<br />
EUCALYPTUS OIL, EUCALYPTI AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: Eucalyptus oil is obtained by steam distillation <strong>and</strong> rectification <strong>of</strong> the fresh leaves or the<br />
fresh terminal branchlets <strong>of</strong> various species <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus rich in 1,8-cineole. The species mainly<br />
used are Eucalyptus globulus Labill., Eucalyptus polybractea R.T. Baker, <strong>and</strong> Eucalyptus smithii<br />
R.T. Baker.<br />
JUNIPER OIL, JUNIPERI AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: <strong>Essential</strong> oil obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the ripe, nonfermented berry cones <strong>of</strong><br />
Juniperus communis L.<br />
LAVENDER OIL, LAVANDULAE AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: <strong>Essential</strong> oil obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the flowering tops <strong>of</strong> Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia<br />
Miller (Lav<strong>and</strong>ula <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis Chaix).<br />
LEMON OIL, LIMONIS AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: <strong>Essential</strong> oil obtained by suitable mechanical means, without the aid <strong>of</strong> heat, from the<br />
fresh peel <strong>of</strong> Citrus limon (L.) Burman fil.<br />
MANDARIN OIL, CITRI RETICULATAE AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: <strong>Essential</strong> oil obtained without heating, by suitable mechanical treatment <strong>of</strong> the fresh<br />
peel <strong>of</strong> the fruit <strong>of</strong> Citrus reticulata Blanco var. m<strong>and</strong>arin.<br />
MATRICARIA OIL, MATRICARIAE AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: Blue essential oil obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the fresh or dried flower heads or<br />
flowering tops <strong>of</strong> Matricaria recutita L. (Chamomilla recutita L. Rauschert). There are two<br />
types <strong>of</strong> matricaria oils, which are characterized as rich in bisabolol oxides or rich in<br />
(-)-a-bisabolol.<br />
MINT OIL, MENTHAE ARVENSIS AETHEROLEUM PARTIM MENTHOL PRIVUM<br />
Definition: <strong>Essential</strong> oil obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the fresh, flowering aerial parts,<br />
recently gathered from Mentha canadensis L. [syn. Mentha arvensis L. var. glabrata (Benth) Fern.,<br />
Mentha arvensis var. piperascens Malinv. ex Holmes], followed by partial separation <strong>of</strong> menthol by<br />
crystallization.
536 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
NEROLI OIL, NEROLI AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: Neroli oil is obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the fresh flowers <strong>of</strong> Citrus aurantium L.<br />
subsp. aurantium L. (Citrus aurantium L. subsp. amara Engl.).<br />
NUTMEG OIL, MYRISTICAE FRAGRANTIS AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: Nutmeg oil is obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the dried <strong>and</strong> crushed kernels <strong>of</strong> Myristica<br />
fragrans Houtt.<br />
PEPPERMINT OIL, MENTHAE PIPERITAE AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: <strong>Essential</strong> oil obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the fresh aerial parts <strong>of</strong> the flowering plant<br />
<strong>of</strong> Mentha piperita L.<br />
PINUS SYLVESTRIS OIL, PINI SYLVESTRIS AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: <strong>Essential</strong> oil obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the fresh needles, twigs, <strong>and</strong> branches <strong>of</strong><br />
Pinus sylvestris L.<br />
TURPENTINE OIL, PINUS PINASTER TYPE, TEREBINTHI AETHEROLEUM AB PINUM PINASTRUM<br />
Definition: <strong>Essential</strong> oil obtained by steam distillation, followed by rectification at a temperature<br />
below 180°C, from the oleoresin obtained by tapping Pinus pinaster Aiton.<br />
ROSEMARY OIL, ROSMARINUM AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: <strong>Essential</strong> oil obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the flowering aerial parts <strong>of</strong> Rosmarinus<br />
<strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L.<br />
STAR ANISE OIL, ANISI STELLATI AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: <strong>Essential</strong> oil obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the dry ripe fruits <strong>of</strong> Illicium verum<br />
Hook. fil.<br />
SWEET ORANGE OIL, AURANTII DULCIS AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: <strong>Essential</strong> oil obtained without heating, by suitable mechanical treatment <strong>of</strong> the fresh<br />
peel <strong>of</strong> the fruit <strong>of</strong> Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck (Citrus aurantium L. var. dulcis L.).<br />
TEA TREE OIL, MELALEUCAE AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: <strong>Essential</strong> oil obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the foliage <strong>and</strong> terminal branchlets <strong>of</strong><br />
Melaleuca alternifolia (Maiden <strong>and</strong> Betch) Cheel, Melaleuca linariifolia Smith, Melaleuca dissitifl<br />
ora F. Mueller, <strong>and</strong>/or other species <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca.<br />
THYME OIL, THYMI AETHEROLEUM<br />
Definition: <strong>Essential</strong> oil obtained by steam distillation <strong>of</strong> the fresh flowering aerial parts <strong>of</strong> Thymus<br />
vulgaris L., T. zygis Loefl. ex L. or a mixture <strong>of</strong> both species.
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 537<br />
12.3 DISCUSSION<br />
The in vitro most antimicrobially active essential oils regularly (or normally) contain substances as<br />
main components, which are themselves known to exhibit pronounced antimicrobial properties.<br />
These are cinnamic aldehyde (cinnamon bark <strong>and</strong> cassia oil) <strong>and</strong> the phenolic compounds eugenol<br />
(clove <strong>and</strong> cinnamon leaf oil) <strong>and</strong> thymol (thyme oil) (Pauli, 2001). All these essential oils reveal a<br />
broadb<strong>and</strong> spectrum <strong>of</strong> activity in various in vitro test systems (agar diffusion, dilution, <strong>and</strong> vapor<br />
phase) due to their considerable water solubility <strong>and</strong> volatility. The evaluated antimicrobial inhibitory<br />
data <strong>of</strong> the essential oils obtained in agar dilution tests (ADT), serial dilution tests (DIL), <strong>and</strong><br />
vapor phase (VP) tests are summarized in Table 12.81.<br />
A few essential oils exhibit limited activities <strong>and</strong> act against a class <strong>of</strong> microorganism, for example,<br />
anise <strong>and</strong> bitter fennel oil specifically inhibit the growth <strong>of</strong> filamentous fungi (Table 12.81), or<br />
act well against microbial species belonging to an identical genus, for example, caraway oil inhibits<br />
Trichophyton species. Some essential oils are active only in a specific test system against a defined<br />
group <strong>of</strong> microorganism, for example, dwarf-pine oil <strong>and</strong> juniper oil preferably inhibit gram-positive<br />
bacteria in the vapor phase, but both were <strong>of</strong> low activity in the agar diffusion or dilution tests.<br />
Similarly, citronella oil was not inhibitory toward nine different fungal species in the agar dilution<br />
test, but inhibited all <strong>of</strong> them in the vapor phase test (Nakahara et al., 2003). Yeasts turned out to be<br />
susceptible toward essential oil vapors, which is in agreement to observations made with volatile<br />
esters <strong>and</strong> monoterpenes. Possibly, in yeast, the biosynthesis <strong>of</strong> chitin is inhibited by voilatile compounds<br />
emitted from plants (Pauli, 2006).<br />
The inhibitory data itself differ considerably from each other when results <strong>of</strong> different examiners<br />
are compared as it can be seen, for example, by the activities <strong>of</strong> lemon oil toward Escherichia coli<br />
(5 tests inactive <strong>and</strong> 4 tests active) in the agar diffusion test (Table 12.43) or by the MIC values<br />
<strong>of</strong> rosemary oil against Staphylococcus aureus (Table 12.67), which cover a range from 20 to<br />
50,000 μg/mL in nine examinations. Even if the unit <strong>of</strong> the low value <strong>of</strong> 20 was confused—this<br />
might had happened in references Panizzi et al. (1993) <strong>and</strong> Pellecuer et al. (1980)—the activity<br />
range <strong>of</strong> rosemary oil is 400–50,000 μg/mL. Taken together, exceptionally the above-mentioned<br />
relatively strong-acting essential oils, the results are not coordinated <strong>and</strong> cover frequently the complete<br />
activity spectrum from inactive to strong active (evaluation from 0 to 3 in Table 12.81). In part,<br />
the results are contradictory <strong>and</strong> no general rules can be raised from the data shown in Tables 12.1<br />
through 12.80.<br />
Several reasons can be made responsible for this undesirable, but at least normal situation:<br />
• Natural variability in the composition <strong>of</strong> essential oils.<br />
• Natural variability in the susceptibility <strong>of</strong> microorganism.<br />
• Different parameters in microbiological testing methods.<br />
• Unknown history <strong>of</strong> the tested essential oils: production, storage, <strong>and</strong> age.<br />
• Unsufficient knowledge about exact phytochemical composition.<br />
The composition <strong>of</strong> essential oils depends on several factors: plant part used, place <strong>of</strong> growth, climate,<br />
natural variation (varieties, subspecies, <strong>and</strong> chemotypes), harvesting time, production, storage<br />
conditions, <strong>and</strong> analysis parameters in compound identification. Because some <strong>of</strong> these influencing<br />
factors differ from year to year, no constant composition <strong>of</strong> an essential can be expected, even when<br />
it is grown <strong>and</strong> produced at the same place. Chemotypes possess in part a completely different composition,<br />
for example, the MICs <strong>of</strong> four thyme oil chemotypes (linalool-, thuyanol-, carvacrol, <strong>and</strong><br />
thymol-type) toward S. aureus (Table 12.79) differ from 250 to 4000 μg/mL <strong>and</strong> low MIC values<br />
depended on the presence <strong>of</strong> thymol (Oussalah et al., 2006). In some literature works, the botanical<br />
description <strong>of</strong> investigated plant material is not defined exactly. The characterization <strong>of</strong> “fennel oil”<br />
is not sufficient to decide between sweet or bitter fennel. The same is true for orange oil, where<br />
sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) <strong>and</strong> bitter orange (Citrus aurantium) refer to two different botanical
538 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.81<br />
Summary <strong>of</strong> Results <strong>of</strong> Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> Listed in the European<br />
Pharmacopoeia 6th Edition<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> Oil Bac- Bac+ Fungi Yeast<br />
Test Method ADT DIL VP ADT DIL VP ADT DIL VP ADT DIL VP<br />
Anise 0–1 0–3 0–2 0–1 0–3 0–2 2–3 0–3 0–2 0–1 1–2 0<br />
Bitter fennel 0–2 1–2 0–3 0–2 1–3 0–2 0–2 2–3 ND 0–2 2 3<br />
Caraway 0–1 0–3 0–3 0–1 1–3 0–3 1–3 0–3 ND 0–1 2 3<br />
Cassia 2 2–3 1–3 2 3 1–3 3 1–3 ND ND 3 3<br />
Cinnamon bark 1–2 3 1–3 1–3 3 1–3 2–3 2–3 0–3 2–3 2–3 3<br />
Cinnamon leaf 2–3 2 3 2–3 2 3 3 1–3 0–3 2 2 3<br />
Citronella 0–1 1–2 0–3 0–1 2–3 0–3 1–3 1–3 3 1–2 1–3 3<br />
Clary sage 0–1 0–1 0–3 1–2 0–3 0–3 0–1 0–2 0 0 0–2 0<br />
Clove 0–2 0–3 1–3 1–3 0–3 0–3 1–3 0–3 3 1–3 0–2 3<br />
Cori<strong>and</strong>er 0–2 0–2 3 0–2 1–3 0–3 0–2 0–3 ND 0–2 2 3<br />
Dwarf pine 0–1 ND 0–3 0–1 ND 2–3 0 ND ND 0–1 0 1<br />
Eucalyptus 0–1 0–1 0–3 0–1 1 0–3 0–1 0–2 0 1 2 3<br />
Juniper 0–1 0–2 1–3 0–1 0 2–3 0–1 0–2 0 0–1 2 3<br />
Lavender 0–1 0–3 0–3 0–3 1–3 0–3 0–2 0–3 3 0–1 2 3<br />
Lemon 0–1 0–1 0–3 0–1 0–2 0–3 0–1 0–3 0–1 0–1 2 3<br />
M<strong>and</strong>arin 0–1 0–2 ND 0–1 0–1 ND 1 ND 0–2 0–1 2 ND<br />
Matricaria 0–1 0–3 0 0–1 0–3 1–2 0–1 0–2 0 0–1 0–2 0<br />
Mint 0–3 2–3 ND 0–1 2–3 ND 0–3 2 ND 1 2 ND<br />
Neroli 0–1 0 0–3 0–1 1–2 0–3 1–2 1–3 ND 0–1 2 3<br />
Nutmeg 0–1 0–2 0 0–1 0–3 0–1 0–3 0–3 ND 0–1 2 ND<br />
Peppermint 0–1 0–3 0–3 0–1 1–3 2–3 0–3 0–3 1–3 0–1 2–3 2<br />
Pinus sylvestris 0–1 0–1 ND 1 0–2 ND 1 0–2 0 1 1–2 ND<br />
Pinus pinaster 0–1 0–2 1–3 0–1 2 1–3 0–1 2 ND 0–1 0–3 2<br />
Rosemary 0–1 0–3 0–3 0–2 0–3 0–3 0–2 0–2 0–3 0–1 0–2 3<br />
Star anise 0–1 ND 2–3 0–1 ND 2–3 ND ND 0–3 0–1 2–3 3<br />
Sweet orange 0–2 0–3 0–3 0–2 0–2 0–3 0–2 0–3 0–3 0–1 2 3<br />
Tea tree 1 0–3 0–3 1–2 0–3 0–3 1 1–3 0 1–3 1–3 ND<br />
Thyme 1–2 1–3 2–3 0–3 0–3 1–3 1–3 1–3 0–3 1–3 2–3 3<br />
Evaluation: Agar diffusion test (ADT): 0 = inactive, 1 = weak (most <strong>of</strong> the inhibition zones up to ~15 mm), 2 = moderate<br />
(most <strong>of</strong> the inhibition zones between 16 <strong>and</strong> 30 mm), 3 = strong inhibitory (most <strong>of</strong> the inhibition<br />
zones >30 mm); dilution test (DIL): 0 = MIC > 20,000 μg/mL, 1 = >5000–20,000 μg/mL, 2 = 500–5000 μg/<br />
mL, 3 =
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 539<br />
Questions concerning disinfectant activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils, for example, the minimum time<br />
needed to kill a given microbial species or the determination <strong>of</strong> microbial survivors after short time<br />
contact, are not answered by agar diffusion or dilution tests. In older literature, the killing concentration<br />
relative to phenol was determined after 15 or 30 min exposure <strong>of</strong> the respective microbials<br />
species to the compound to be tested. The so-called carboxylic acid coefficient or phenol coefficient<br />
was introduced in 1903 (Rideal et al., 1903) <strong>and</strong> was also taken for the characterization <strong>of</strong> the<br />
killing activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils toward microorganism (Martindale, 1910).<br />
Differences in the susceptibility exist between organisms <strong>of</strong> the identical species as it was shown<br />
in experiments with three Escherichia coli strains. One <strong>of</strong> them was inhibited by eugenol methyl<br />
ether at a low concentration (MIC = 550 μg/mL), while two other strains tolerated still 8000 μg/mL<br />
without any visible growth reduction. Remarkably the MIC <strong>of</strong> eugenol toward all three strains was<br />
almost equal (550–600 μg/mL) (Pauli, 1994). Because these Escherichia coli strains never had had<br />
the opportunity to develop a specific resistance against eugenol methyl ether before, it is evident that<br />
a natural variation <strong>of</strong> susceptibility toward natural antimicrobials exists.<br />
To improve the data situation <strong>of</strong> in vitro antimicrobial data <strong>of</strong> essential oils, all aforementioned<br />
biological <strong>and</strong> experimental parameters should be controlled as best as possible. An appropriate<br />
microbiological test system should be taken, which allows comparison <strong>of</strong> inhibitory data with drugs<br />
used in the therapy <strong>of</strong> human infectious diseases. Such worked out <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ardized serial dilution<br />
tests (Clinical & Laboratory St<strong>and</strong>ards Institute 2008) are already utilized in the examination <strong>of</strong><br />
natural substances, for example Hostettmann et al. (1999) <strong>and</strong> Jirovetz et al. (2007). To avoid<br />
complications by strains with unknown susceptibilities toward antimicrobials <strong>and</strong> to make the<br />
results from different laboratories comparable to each other, available st<strong>and</strong>ard strains from collections<br />
(e.g., American Type Culture Collection, ATCC; Deutsche Sammlung für Mikroorganismen<br />
und Zellkulturen, DSMZ; <strong>and</strong> Institute for Fermentation Osaka, IFO) should be taken in the routine<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> antimicrobial activities <strong>of</strong> natural compounds <strong>and</strong> essential oils. Antimicrobials tests<br />
should include a greater number <strong>of</strong> different organisms belonging to the groups: gram-positive,<br />
gram-negative bacteria, filamentous fungi, <strong>and</strong> yeasts.<br />
Two principal reasons for performing the in vitro tests are as follows:<br />
1. Identification <strong>of</strong> antimicrobially active compounds.<br />
2. Control <strong>of</strong> microbial susceptibilities toward approved antibiotics <strong>and</strong> antimycotics.<br />
The procedure from identification <strong>of</strong> antimicrobially active compounds to their use in humans to<br />
treat infectious diseases is a multistep pathway, which includes pharmacological (concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
the active compound at the site <strong>of</strong> action, half-life time, serum levels, dose–response relationship,<br />
etc.) <strong>and</strong> toxicological (e.g., toxicity, allergic responses, <strong>and</strong> interactions) aspects.<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils consist frequently <strong>of</strong> over 100 individual compounds, which themselves plus their<br />
metabolic transformation products cannot be followed up in the living body. This fact may explain<br />
why pharmacological studies with entire essential oils never have been in the focus <strong>of</strong> pharmaceutical<br />
research.<br />
In animal experiments, it was demonstrated by Imura over 80 years ago that the in vivo protection<br />
against tuberculosis was not parallel with results in vitro (Table 12.82).<br />
The superior protection <strong>of</strong> tuberculosis-infected guinea pigs by anethole <strong>and</strong> lemon oil is<br />
contradictory to their weak in vitro antitubercular activity. By means <strong>of</strong> these results obtained<br />
parallelly in vivo <strong>and</strong> in vitro it is obvious that in vitro inhibitory data alone cannot be used as<br />
an information basis for the treatment <strong>of</strong> infectious diseases in humans (Table 12.81). Therefore,<br />
the recording <strong>of</strong> so-called aromatograms with patient isolates <strong>and</strong> a greater number <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oils—as it is common in “aromatherapy”—is critical (Anonymus, 2008; DHZ-Spektrum, 2007).<br />
The selection <strong>of</strong> the most active essential oil by using in vitro testing methods for the therapy <strong>of</strong><br />
infectious diseases may have success, but at least there is no rational relationship between in vitro<br />
testing <strong>and</strong> in vivo success (Table 12.81). Besides that, many factors influence the results obtained
540 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 12.82<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> In Vitro Growth Inhibition <strong>of</strong> Human Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Mycobacterium tuberculosis with the In Vivo Protection <strong>of</strong><br />
Tuberculosis-Infected Guinea Pigs by <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
Components There<strong>of</strong><br />
Test Materials<br />
Lymphnodes<br />
In Vivo a<br />
Viscera<br />
In Vitro b<br />
Anethole 33 50 2500<br />
Lemon oil 49 55 1250<br />
Terpineol 59 57 625<br />
Nutmeg oil, expressed 61 73 312<br />
Geraniol 96 71 625<br />
Eugenol 89 84 1250<br />
Source: Imura, K., 1935. J. Shanghai Sci. Institute/Section, 4, 1: 235–270.<br />
a<br />
Grade <strong>of</strong> tuberculous change in percent was observed after 10 weeks in lymphnodes <strong>and</strong><br />
viscera in groups <strong>of</strong> five infected guinea pigs fed with ~250 mg/kg (recalculated from<br />
experimental section) test material per day for 1 week, respectively.<br />
b<br />
Growth reduction (dry weight tubercle bacilli 5 mg) by a given concentration in μg/mL<br />
determined in glycerin-bouillon after 3 weeks incubation at 37°C.<br />
in the agar diffusion test <strong>and</strong> may lead to wrong interpretation <strong>of</strong> the results concerning the<br />
antimicrobial strength <strong>of</strong> an essential oil.<br />
It seems to be suitable to discuss a special status <strong>of</strong> essential oils in concern <strong>of</strong> their pharmacological<br />
activities, since essential oils cannot be followed up by classical pharmacological methods<br />
due to their complex nature. Recently, successes <strong>of</strong> wound treatment with essential oils have<br />
been demonstrated under clinical conditions, which cannot be realized with pharmaceuticals<br />
(Warnke et al., 2005). In another case, a deep infection <strong>of</strong> a hip arthoplasty was successfully<br />
treated with a pure compound occurring in matricaria oil: (-)-a-bisabolol (Pauli et al., 2007,<br />
2009). Due to its lipophilic nature (-)-a-bisabolol is thought to be taken up by the skin <strong>and</strong> it<br />
enters the blood circulatory system, which should be measureable with pharmacological methods.<br />
Interestingly, the toxicity <strong>of</strong> essential oils toward mammalians decreases significantly with<br />
increase <strong>of</strong> average lipophilicity <strong>of</strong> their components (Pauli, 2008), while simultaneously the toxicity<br />
toward bacteria <strong>and</strong> fungi increases significantly with increasing lipophilicity (Pauli, 2007),<br />
which points to the extraordinary role <strong>of</strong> essential oils among natural compounds, especially <strong>of</strong><br />
their highly lipophilic constituents.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Aggag, M.E. <strong>and</strong> R.T. Yousef, 1972. Study <strong>of</strong> antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> chamomile oil. Planta Med., 22:<br />
140–144.<br />
Al-Bayati, F., 2008. Synergistic antibacterial activity between Thymus vulgaris <strong>and</strong> Pimpinella anisum essential<br />
oils <strong>and</strong> methanol extracts. J. Ethnopharmacol., 116: 403–406.<br />
Angelini, P., R. Pagiotti, <strong>and</strong> B. Granetti, 2008. Effect <strong>of</strong> antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca alternifolia essential<br />
oil on antagonistic potential <strong>of</strong> Pleurotus species against Trichoderma harzianum in dual culture.<br />
World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 24: 197–202.<br />
Angioni, A., A. Barra, W. Cereti, et al., 2004. Chemical composition, plant genetic differences, antimicrobial<br />
<strong>and</strong> antifungal activity investigation <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Rosmarinus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L. J. Agric. Food Chem.,<br />
52: 3530–3535.
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 541<br />
Angioni, A., A. Barra, M.T. Russo, et al., 2003. Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the essential oils <strong>of</strong> Juniperus<br />
from ripe <strong>and</strong> unripe berries <strong>and</strong> leaves <strong>and</strong> their antimicrobial activity. J. Agric. Food Chem., 51:<br />
3073–3078.<br />
Arras, G. <strong>and</strong> M. Usai, 2001. Fungitoxic activity <strong>of</strong> 12 essential oils against four postharvest citrus pathogens:<br />
Chemical analysis <strong>of</strong> Thymus capitatus oil <strong>and</strong> its effect in subatmospheric pressure conditions, J. Food<br />
Prot., 64: 1025–1029.<br />
Ashhurst, A.P., 1927. The centenary <strong>of</strong> Lister (1827–1927). A tale <strong>of</strong> sepsis <strong>and</strong> anti-sepsis. Ann. Med. History,<br />
9: 205–211.<br />
Banes-Marshall, L., P. Cawley, <strong>and</strong> C.A. Phillips, 2001. In vitro activity <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil<br />
against bacterial <strong>and</strong> C<strong>and</strong>ida spp. isolates from clinical specimens. Br. J. Biomed. Sci., 58: 139–145.<br />
Bastide, P., R. Malhuret, J.C. Chalchat, et al., 1987. Correlation <strong>of</strong> chemical composition <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial<br />
activity. II. Activity <strong>of</strong> three resinous essential oils on two bacterial strains. Plantes Medicinales et<br />
Phytotherapie, 21: 209–217.<br />
Belletti, N., M. Ndagijimana, C. Sisto, et al., 2004. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> citrus essences<br />
on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Agric. Food Chem., 52: 6932–6938.<br />
Boesel, R. 1991. Pharmakognostische, phytochemische und mikrobiologische Untersuchung von<br />
Queckenwurzelstock Rhizoma graminis (Erg.-B. 6) (Agropyron repens (L.) PALISOT DE BEAUVOIS,<br />
Poaceae), Dissertation, FU Berlin, Germany.<br />
Bouchra, C., A. Mohamed, I.H. Mina, et al., 2003. Antifungal activity <strong>of</strong> essential oil from several medicinal<br />
plants against four postharvest citrus pathogens. Phytopathol. Mediterranea, 42: 251–256.<br />
Buchholtz, L., 1875. Antiseptika und Bakterien. Archiv experim. Pathologie Pharmakologie., 4: 1–82.<br />
Caccioni, D.R., M. Guizzardi, D.M. Biondi, et al., 1998. Relationship between volatile components <strong>of</strong> citrus<br />
fruit essential oils <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial action on Penicillium digitatum <strong>and</strong> Penicillium italicum. Int. J. Food<br />
Microbiol., 43: 73–79.<br />
Canillac, N. <strong>and</strong> A. Mourey, 1996. Compartement de Listeria en presence d’huiles essentielles de sapin et de<br />
pin. <strong>Science</strong>s des Aliments, 16: 403–411.<br />
Cantore, P.L., N.S. Iacobellis, A. DeMarco, et al., 2004. Antibacterial activity <strong>of</strong> Cori<strong>and</strong>rum sativum L. <strong>and</strong><br />
Foeniculum vulgare Miller var. vulgare (Miller) essential oils. J. Agric. Food Chem., 52: 7862–7866.<br />
Carson C.F. <strong>and</strong> S. Messager, 2005. Tea tree oil: A potential alternative for the management <strong>of</strong> methicillinresistant<br />
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Aust. Infect. Control., 10: 32–34.<br />
Carson, C.F., B.D. Cookson, H.D. Farrelly, et al., 1995. Susceptibility <strong>of</strong> methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus<br />
aureus to the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca alternifolia. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 35: 421–424.<br />
Carson, C.F., K.A. Hammer, <strong>and</strong> T.V. Riley, 1996. In-vitro activity <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca alternifolia<br />
against Streptococcus spp. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 37: 1177–1178.<br />
Carson, C.F., K.A. Hammer, <strong>and</strong> T.V. Riley, 2006. Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil: A review <strong>of</strong> antimicrobial<br />
<strong>and</strong> other medicinal properties. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 19: 50–62.<br />
Cavaleiro, C., E. Pinto, M.J. Goncalves, et al., 2006. Antifungal activity <strong>of</strong> Juniperus essential oils against<br />
dermatophyte, Aspergillus <strong>and</strong> C<strong>and</strong>ida strains. J. Appl. Microbiol., 100: 1333–1338.<br />
Chalchat, J.C., R.P. Garry, A. Michet et al., 1989. Chemical composition/antimicrobial activity correlation: IV.<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> the activity <strong>of</strong> natural <strong>and</strong> oxygenated essential oils against six strains. Plantes Medicinales<br />
et Phytotherapie, 23: 305–314.<br />
Clinical <strong>and</strong> Laboratory St<strong>and</strong>ards Institute, 2008. CAP Laboratory Accreditation Program Inspection<br />
Checklist. MIC–Microbiology. http://www.clsi.org/Content/NavigationMenu/St<strong>and</strong>ardsActivities/CLSI<br />
DocumentsonCAPChecklists/mic.htm<br />
Conner, D.E. <strong>and</strong> L.R. Beuchat, 1984. Effect <strong>of</strong> essential oils from plants on growth <strong>of</strong> food spoilage yeasts.<br />
J. Food Sci., 49: 429–434.<br />
Cosentino, S., A. Barra, B. Pisano, et al., 2003. Composition <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial properties <strong>of</strong> Sardinian<br />
Juniperus essential oils against foodborne pathogens <strong>and</strong> spoilage microorganisms. J. Food Prot., 66:<br />
1288–1291.<br />
Dabbah, R., V.M. Edwards, <strong>and</strong> W.A. Moats,1970. Antimicrobial action <strong>of</strong> some citrus fruit oils on selected<br />
food-borne bacteria. Appl. Microbiol., 19: 27–31.<br />
Deans, S.G. <strong>and</strong> G. Ritchie, 1987. Antibacterial properties <strong>of</strong> plant essential oils. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 5:<br />
165–180.<br />
DHZ-Spektrum, 2007. Aromatogramm als Schlüssel zur “antibiotischen Aromatherapie”. Dtsch. Heilpraktiker-<br />
Zeitschr. 2: 22–25.<br />
Di Pasqua, R., V. De Feo, F. Villani, et al., 2005. In vitro antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils from<br />
Mediterranean Apiaceae, Verbenaceae <strong>and</strong> Lamiaceae against foodborne pathogens <strong>and</strong> spoilage bacteria.<br />
Ann. Microbiol., 55: 139–145.
542 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Dikshit, A. <strong>and</strong> A. Husain, 1984. Antifungal action <strong>of</strong> some essential oils against animal pathogens. Fitoterapia,<br />
55: 171–176.<br />
Dikshit, A., A.A. Naqvi, <strong>and</strong> A. Husain, 1986. Schinus molle: A new source <strong>of</strong> natural fungitoxicant. Appl.<br />
Environ. Microbiol., 51: 1085–1088.<br />
Dikshit, A., A.K. Singh, <strong>and</strong> S.N. Dixit, 1982. Effect <strong>of</strong> pH on fungitoxic activity <strong>of</strong> some essential oils. Bokin<br />
Bobai, 10: 9–10.<br />
Dikshit, A., A.K. Singh, R.D. Tripathi, et al., 1979. Fungitoxic <strong>and</strong> phytotoxic studies <strong>of</strong> some essential oils.<br />
Biolog. Bull. India, 1: 45–51.<br />
Duarte, M.C., G.M. Figueira, A. Sartoratto, et al., 2005. Anti-C<strong>and</strong>ida activity <strong>of</strong> Brazilian medicinal plants.<br />
J. Ethnopharmacol., 97: 305–311.<br />
Duarte, M.C.T., C. Leme-Delarmelina, G.M. Figueira, et al., 2006. Effects <strong>of</strong> essential oils from medicinal<br />
plants used in Brazil against epec <strong>and</strong> etec Escherichia coli. Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais,<br />
8: 129–143.<br />
Dube, K.G. <strong>and</strong> T.S.S. Rao, 1984. Antibacterial efficacy <strong>of</strong> some Indian essential oils. Chemicals Petro-<br />
Chemicals J., 15: 13–14.<br />
Dubey, P., S. Dube, <strong>and</strong> S.C. Tripathi, 1990. Fungitoxic properties <strong>of</strong> essential oil <strong>of</strong> Anethum graveolens L.<br />
Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad.—Part B: Biol. Sci., 60: 179–184.<br />
El-Gengaihi, S. <strong>and</strong> D. Zaki, 1982. Biological investigation <strong>of</strong> some essential oils isolated from Egyptian<br />
plants. Herba Hungarica, 21: 107–111.<br />
Ertürk, Ö., T.B. Özbucak, <strong>and</strong> A. Bayrak, 2006. Antimicrobial activities <strong>of</strong> some medicinal essential oils. Herba<br />
Polonica, 52: 58–66.<br />
Farag, R.S., Z.Y. Daw, F.M. Hewedi, et al., 1989. Antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> some Egyptian spice essential oils.<br />
J. Food Prot., 52: 665–667.<br />
Fawzi, M.A., 1991. Studies on the antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> the volatile oil <strong>of</strong> Thymus vulgaris. Alex<strong>and</strong>ria<br />
J. Pharm. Sci., 5: 113–115.<br />
Feng, W. <strong>and</strong> X. Zheng, 2007. <strong>Essential</strong> oils to control Alternaria alternata in vitro <strong>and</strong> in vivo. Food Control,<br />
18: 1126–1130.<br />
Fisher, K. <strong>and</strong> C.A. Phillips, 2006. The effect <strong>of</strong> lemon, orange <strong>and</strong> bergamot essential oils <strong>and</strong> their components<br />
on the survival <strong>of</strong> Campylobacter jejuni, Escherichia coli O157, Listeria monocytogenes, Bacillus<br />
cereus <strong>and</strong> Staphylococcus aureus in vitro <strong>and</strong> in food systems. J. Appl. Microbiol., 101: 1232–1240.<br />
Friedman, M., P.R. Henika, C.E. Levin, et al., 2004. Antibacterial activities <strong>of</strong> plant essential oils <strong>and</strong> their<br />
components against Escherichia coli O157:H7 <strong>and</strong> Salmonella enterica in apple juice. J. Agric. Food<br />
Chem., 52: 6042–6048.<br />
Furneri, P.M., D. Paolino, A. Saija, et al., 2006. In vitro antimycoplasmal activity <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca alternifolia<br />
essential oil. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 58: 706–707.<br />
Gangrade, S.K., S.K. Shrivastave, O.P. Sharma, et al., 1991. In vitro antifungal effect <strong>of</strong> the essential oils.<br />
Indian Perf., 35: 46–48.<br />
Garg, S.C. <strong>and</strong> D.C. Garg, 1980. Antibakterielle Wirksamkeit in vitro einiger etherischer Öle. Teil 1. Parfuem.<br />
Kosmet., 61: 219–220.<br />
Garg, S.C. <strong>and</strong> D.C. Garg, 1980. Antibakterielle Wirksamkeit in vitro einiger etherischer Öle. Teil 2. Parfuem.<br />
Kosmet., 61: 255–256.<br />
Geinitz, R., 1912. Vergleichende Versuche über die narkotischen und desinfizierenden Wirkungen der gangbarsten<br />
ätherischen Öle und deren wirksamen Best<strong>and</strong>teile. Sitzungsberichte und Abh<strong>and</strong>lungen der<br />
naturforschenden Gesellschaft zu Rostock. Neue Folge. IV: 33–98.<br />
Goutham, M.P. <strong>and</strong> R.M. Purohit, 1974. Überprüfung einiger ätherischer Öle auf ihre antibakteriellen<br />
Eigenschaften. Riechst<strong>of</strong>fe, Aromen, Körperpfl egemittel, 3: 70–71.<br />
Griffin, S.G., J.L. Markham, <strong>and</strong> D.N. Leach, 2000. An agar dilution method for the determination <strong>of</strong> the minimum<br />
inhibitory concentration <strong>of</strong> essential oils. J. Essent. Oil Res., 12: 249–255.<br />
Gustafson, J.E., Y.C. Liew, S. Chew, et al., 1998. Effects <strong>of</strong> tea tree oil on Escherichia coli. Lett. Appl. Microbiol.,<br />
26: 194–198.<br />
Guynot, M.E., S. Marin, L. Seto, et al. 2005. Screening for antifungal activity <strong>of</strong> some essential oils against<br />
common spoilage fungi <strong>of</strong> bakery products. Food Sci. Technol. Int., 11: 25–32.<br />
Guynot, M.E., A.J. Ramos, L. Seto, et al., 2003. Antifungal activity <strong>of</strong> volatile compounds generated by<br />
essential oils against fungi commonly causing deterioration <strong>of</strong> bakery products. J. Appl. Microbiol., 94:<br />
893–899.<br />
Hadacek, F. <strong>and</strong> H. Greger. 2000. Testing <strong>of</strong> antifungal natural products: Methodologies, comparability <strong>of</strong><br />
results <strong>and</strong> assay <strong>of</strong> choice. Phytochem. Anal., 11: 137–147.
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 543<br />
Hammer, K.A., C.F. Carson, <strong>and</strong> T.V. Riley, 1999. Antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> other plant<br />
extracts. J. Appl. Microbiol., 86: 985–990.<br />
Hammer, K.A., C.F. Carson, <strong>and</strong> T.V. Riley, 1999. In vitro susceptibilities <strong>of</strong> lactobacilli <strong>and</strong> organisms associated<br />
with bacterial vaginosis to Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 43:<br />
196.<br />
Hammer, K.A., C.F. Carson, <strong>and</strong> T.V. Riley, 1996. Susceptibility <strong>of</strong> transient <strong>and</strong> commensal skin flora to the<br />
essential oil <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree oil). Am. J. Infect. Control, 24: 186–189.<br />
Hammer, K.A., C.F. Carson, <strong>and</strong> T.V. Riley, 1998. In-vitro activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils in particular Melaleuca<br />
alternifolia (tea tree) oil <strong>and</strong> tea tree oil products, against C<strong>and</strong>ida spp. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 42:<br />
591–595.<br />
Hammer, K.A., C.F. Carson, <strong>and</strong> T.V. Riley, 1999. Influence <strong>of</strong> organic matter, cations <strong>and</strong> surfactants on the<br />
antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil in vitro. J. Appl. Microbiol., 86: 446–452.<br />
Hammer, K.A., C.F. Carson, <strong>and</strong> T.V. Riley, 2000. In vitro activities <strong>of</strong> ketoconazole, econazole, miconazole,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil against Malassezia species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 44:<br />
467–469.<br />
Hammer, K.A., C.F. Carson, <strong>and</strong> T.V. Riley, 2002. In vitro activity <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil<br />
against dermatophytes <strong>and</strong> other filamentous fungi. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 50: 195–199.<br />
Harkenthal, M., J. Reichling, H.K. Geiss, et al., 1999. Comparative study on the in vitro antibacterial activity<br />
<strong>of</strong> Australian tea tree oil, cajuput oil, niaouli oil, manuka oil, kanuka oil, <strong>and</strong> eucalyptus oil. Pharmazie,<br />
54: 460–463.<br />
Hethenyi, E., I. Koczka, <strong>and</strong> P. Tetenyi, 1989. Phytochemical <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils. Herba<br />
Hungarica, 28: 99–115.<br />
Hili, P., C.S. Evans, <strong>and</strong> R.G. Veness, 1997. Antimicrobial action <strong>of</strong> essential oils: The effect <strong>of</strong> dimethylsulphoxide<br />
on the activity <strong>of</strong> cinnamon oil. Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 24: 269–275.<br />
Hostettmann, K. <strong>and</strong> F. Schaller, 1999. Antimicrobial diterpenes. U.S. Patent 5,929,124.<br />
Imai, H., K. Osawa, H. Yasuda, et al., 2001. Inhibition by the essential oils <strong>of</strong> peppermint <strong>and</strong> spearmint <strong>of</strong> the<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> pathogenic bacteria. Microbios., 106(Suppl. 1): 31–39.<br />
Imura, K., 1935. On the influence <strong>of</strong> the ethereal oils upon the culture <strong>of</strong> tubercle bacilli <strong>and</strong> upon development<br />
<strong>of</strong> experimental tuberculosis in animals. J. Shanghai Sci. Institute/Section, 4, 1: 235–270.<br />
Inouye, S., T. Takizawa, <strong>and</strong> H. Yamaguchi, 2001. Antibacterial activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> their major constituents<br />
against respiratory tract pathogens by gaseous contact. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 47:<br />
565–573.<br />
Iscan, G., N. Kirimer, M. Kurkcuoglu, et al., 2002. Antimicrobial screening <strong>of</strong> Mentha piperita essential oils.<br />
J. Agric. Food Chem., 50: 3943–3946.<br />
Janssen, A.M., N.L.J. Chin, J.J.C. Scheffer, et al., 1986. Screening for antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> some essential<br />
oils by the agar overlay technique. Pharmacy World Sci., 8: 289–292.<br />
Janssen, A.M., J.J.C. Scheffer, <strong>and</strong> A. Baerheim-Svendsen, 1987. Antimicrobial activities <strong>of</strong> essential oils. A<br />
1976–1986 literature review on possible applications. Pharm. Weekblad Sci. Ed., 9: 193–197.<br />
Janssen, A.M., J.J.C. Scheffer, A.W. Parhan-van Atten, et al., 1988. Screening <strong>of</strong> some essential oils on their<br />
activities on dermatophytes. Pharm. Weekblad Sci. Ed., 10: 277–280.<br />
Jirovetz, L., G. Eller, G. Buchbauer, et al., 2006. Chemical composition <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial activities <strong>and</strong> odor<br />
description <strong>of</strong> some essential oils with characteristic flory-rosy scent <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> their principal aroma compounds.<br />
Recent Res. Dev. Agron. Hort., 2: 1–12.<br />
Jirovetz, L., K. Wlcek, G. Buchbauer, et al., 2007. Antifungal activity <strong>of</strong> various Lamiaceae essential oils rich<br />
in thymol <strong>and</strong> carvacrol against clinical isolates <strong>of</strong> pathogenic fungi. Int.. J. Essent. Oil Therap., 1:<br />
153–157.<br />
Kedzia, B., 1991. Antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> chamomile oil <strong>and</strong> its components. Herba Polonica, 37: 29–38.<br />
Kellner, W. <strong>and</strong> W. Kober, 1954. Möglichkeiten der Verwendung ätherischer Öle zur Raumdesinfektion. 1.<br />
Mitteilung. Die Wirkung gebräuchlicher ätherischer Öle auf Testkeime. Arzneim.-Forsch., 4: 319–325.<br />
Kindra, K.J. <strong>and</strong> T. Satyanarayana, 1978. Inhibitory activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>of</strong> some plants against pathogenic<br />
bacteria. Indian Drugs, 16: 15–17.<br />
Koba, K., K. S<strong>and</strong>a, C. Raynaud, et al., 2004. Activites antimicrobiennes d’huiles essentielles de trois<br />
CMYBopogon sp. africains vis-avis de germes pathogenes d’animaux de compagnie. Annales de medecine<br />
veterinaire, 148: 202–206.<br />
Koch, R., 1881. Über Desinfektion. Mittheilungen aus dem Kaiserlichen Gesundheitsamte, 1: 234–282.<br />
Kosalec, I., S. Pepeljnjak, <strong>and</strong> D. Kustrak, 2005. Antifungal activity <strong>of</strong> fluid extract <strong>and</strong> essential oil from anise<br />
fruits (Pimpinella anisum L., Apiaceae). Acta Pharm. (Zagreb)., 55: 377–385.
544 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Kubo, I., H. Muroi, <strong>and</strong> A. Kubo, 1993. Antibacterial activity <strong>of</strong> long chain alcohols against Streptococcus<br />
mutans. J. Agric. Food Chem., 41: 2447–2450.<br />
Kumar, R., N.K. Dubey, O.P. Tiwari, et al., 2007. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> some essential oils as botanical fungitoxicants<br />
for the protection <strong>of</strong> stored food commodities from fungal infestation. J. Sci. Food Agric., 87: 1737–1742.<br />
Kurita, N. <strong>and</strong> S. Koike, 1983. Synergistic antimicrobial effect <strong>of</strong> ethanol, sodium chloride, acetic acid <strong>and</strong><br />
essential oil components. J. Agric. Biol. Chem., 47: 67–75.<br />
Lee, S.O., G.J. Choi, K.S. Jang, et al., 2007. Antifungal activity <strong>of</strong> five plant essential oils as fumigant against<br />
postharvest <strong>and</strong> soilborne plant pathogenic fungi. Plant Pathol. J., 23: 97–102.<br />
Lemos, T.L.G., F.J.Q. Monte, F.J.A. Matos, et al., 1992. Chemical composition <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong><br />
essential oils from Brazilian plants. Fitoterapia, 63: 266–268.<br />
Lens-Lisbonne, C., A. Cremieux, C. Maillard et al., 1987. Methods d’evaluation de l’activite antibacterienne<br />
des huiles essentieles. Application aux essences de thym et de canelle. J. Pharmacie Belg., 42:<br />
297–302.<br />
Lis-Balchin, M., S.G. Deans, <strong>and</strong> E. Eaglesham, 1998. Relationship between bioactivity <strong>and</strong> chemical composition<br />
<strong>of</strong> commercial essential oils. Flav. Fragr. J., 13: 98–104.<br />
Martindale, W.H., 1910. <strong>Essential</strong> oils in relation to their antiseptic powers as determined by their carbolic acid<br />
coefficients. Perf. Essent. Oil Rec., 1: 266.<br />
Maruzzella, J.C., 1963. An investigation <strong>of</strong> the antimicrobial properties <strong>of</strong> absolutes. Am. Perfum. Cosmet., 78:<br />
19–20.<br />
Maruzzella, J.C. <strong>and</strong> L. Liguori, 1958. The in vitro antifungal activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc.<br />
Sci. Ed., 47: 250–255.<br />
Maruzzella, J.C. <strong>and</strong> M.B. Lichtenstein, 1956. The in vitro antibacterial activity <strong>of</strong> oils. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc.<br />
Sci. Ed., 45: 378–381.<br />
Maruzzella, J.C. <strong>and</strong> N.A. Sicurella. 1960. Antibacterial activity <strong>of</strong> essential oil vapores. J. Am. Pharm.. Assoc.,<br />
Sci. Ed., 49: 692–694.<br />
McCarthy, P.J., T.P. Pitts, G.P. Gunawardana, et al., 1992. Antifungal activity <strong>of</strong> meridine, a natural product<br />
from the marine sponge Corticium sp. J. Nat. Prod., 55: 1664–1668.<br />
Mikhlin, E.D., V.P. Radina, A.A. Dmitrovskii, et al., 1983. Antifungal <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> beta-ionone<br />
<strong>and</strong> vitamin A derivatives. Prikladnaja biochimija i mikrobiologija., 19: 795–803.<br />
Mimica-Dukic, N., S. Kujundzic, M. Sokovic, et al., 2003. <strong>Essential</strong> oils composition <strong>and</strong> antifungal activity <strong>of</strong><br />
Foeniculum vulgare Mill. obtained by different distillation conditions. Phytother. Res., 17: 368–371.<br />
Mondello, F., F. De Bernardis, A. Girolamo, et al., 2006. In vivo activity <strong>of</strong> terpinen-4-ol, the main bioactive<br />
component <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca alternifolia Cheel (tea tree) oil against azole-susceptible <strong>and</strong> -resistant human<br />
pathogenic C<strong>and</strong>ida species. BMC Infect. Dis., 6: 91.<br />
Morris, J.A., A. Khettry, <strong>and</strong> E.W. Seitz, 1979. Antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> aroma chemicals <strong>and</strong> essential oils.<br />
J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 56: 595–603.<br />
Möse, J.R. <strong>and</strong> G. Lukas, 1957. Zur Wirksamkeit einiger ätherischer Öle und deren Inhaltsst<strong>of</strong>fe auf Bakterien.<br />
Arzneim.-Forsch., 7: 687–692.<br />
Motiejunaite, O. <strong>and</strong> D. Peciulyte, 2004. Fungicidal properties <strong>of</strong> Pinus sylvestris L. for improvement <strong>of</strong> air<br />
quality. Medicina (Kaunas), 40: 787–794.<br />
Mueller-Ribeau, F., B. Berger, <strong>and</strong> O. Yegen, 1995. Chemical composition <strong>and</strong> fungitoxic properties to phytopathogenic<br />
fungi <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>of</strong> selected aromatic plants growing wild in Turkey. J. Agric. Food<br />
Chem., 43: 2262–2266.<br />
Nakahara, K., N.S. Alzoreky, T. Yoshihashi, et al., 2003. Chemical composition <strong>and</strong> antifungal activity <strong>of</strong><br />
essential oils from CMYBopogon nardus (citronella grass). Jpn. Agric. Res. Quart., 37: 249–252.<br />
Narasimba Rao, B.G.V. <strong>and</strong> P.L. Joseph, 1971. Die Wirksamkeit einiger ätherischer Öle gegenüber phytopathogenen<br />
Fungi. Riechst<strong>of</strong>fe, Aromen, Körperpfl egemittel, 21: 405–410.<br />
Narasimha Rao, B.G.V. <strong>and</strong> S.S. Nigam, 1970. The in vitro antimicrobial efficiency <strong>of</strong> some essential oils. Flav.<br />
Ind., 1: 725–729.<br />
Nelson, R.R., 1997. In-vitro activities <strong>of</strong> five plant essential oils against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus<br />
aureus <strong>and</strong> vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 40: 305–306.<br />
Nigam, S.S. <strong>and</strong> J.T. Rao, 1979. Efficacy <strong>of</strong> some Indian essential oils against thermophilic fungi <strong>and</strong> Penicillium<br />
species. 7th Int. Congr. Essent. <strong>Oils</strong>, 1977 (pub. 1979). 7: 485–487.<br />
Okazaki, K. <strong>and</strong> S. Oshima, 1952. Antibacterial activity <strong>of</strong> higher plants. XX. Antimicrobial effect <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oils. 1). Clove oil <strong>and</strong> eugenol. Yakugaku Zasshi, 72: 558–560.<br />
Okazaki, K. <strong>and</strong> S. Oshima, 1952. Antibacterial activity <strong>of</strong> higher plants. XXII. Antimicrobial effect <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oils. 1. Fungistatic effect <strong>of</strong> clove oil <strong>and</strong> eugenol. Yakugaku Zasshi, 72: 664–667.
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 545<br />
Okazaki, K. <strong>and</strong> S. Oshima, 1953. Studies on the fungicides for drug preparation. Yakugaku Zasshi, 73:<br />
692–696.<br />
Oliva, B., E. Piccirilli, T. Ceddia, et al., 2003. Antimycotic activity <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil <strong>and</strong><br />
its major components. Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 37: 185–187.<br />
Ooi, L.S., Y. Li, S.L. Kam, et al., 2006. Antimicrobial activities <strong>of</strong> cinnamon oil <strong>and</strong> cinnamaldehyde from the<br />
Chinese medicinal herb Cinnamon cassia Blume. Am. J. Chin. Med., 34: 511–522.<br />
Oussalah, M., S. Caillet, L. Saucier, et al., 2006. Inhibitory effects <strong>of</strong> selected plant essential oils on the growth<br />
<strong>of</strong> four pathogenic bacteria: Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella typhimurium, Staphylococcus aureus<br />
<strong>and</strong> Listeria monocytogenes. Meat <strong>Science</strong>, 73: 236–244.<br />
Panizzi, L., G. Flamini, P.L. Cioni, et al., 1993. Composition <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial properties <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>of</strong><br />
four mediterannean Lamiaceae. J. Ethnopharmacol., 39: 167–170.<br />
Papadopoulos, C.J., C.F. Carson, K.A. Hammer, et al., 2006. Susceptibility <strong>of</strong> pseudomonads to Melaleuca<br />
alternifolia (tea tree) oil <strong>and</strong> components. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 58: 449–451.<br />
Pauli, A., 1994. Chemische, physikalische und antimikrobielle Eigenschaften von in ätherischen Ölen vorkommenden<br />
Phenylpropanen. Dissertation, University Würzburg, Germany.<br />
Pauli, A., 2001. Antimicrobial properties <strong>of</strong> essential oil constituents. Int. J. Aromather., 11: 126–133.<br />
Pauli, A., 2006. Antic<strong>and</strong>idal low molecular compounds from higher plants with special reference to compounds<br />
from essential oils. Med. Res. Rev., 26: 223–268.<br />
Pauli, A., 2007. Identification strategy <strong>of</strong> mechanism-based lipophilic antimicrobials. In New Biocides<br />
Development: The Combined Approach <strong>of</strong> Chemistry <strong>and</strong> Microbiology (ACS Symposium Series), P.<br />
Zhu, ed. pp. 213–268. Corby: Oxford University Press.<br />
Pauli, A., 2007. Kritische Anmerkungen zur keimhemmenden Wirkung ätherischer Öle und deren Best<strong>and</strong>teile.<br />
Kompl. Integr. Med., 48: 20–23.<br />
Pauli, A., 2008. Relationship between lipophilicity <strong>and</strong> toxicity <strong>of</strong> essential oils. Int. J. Essent. Oil Ther., 2: (in<br />
press).<br />
Pauli, A. <strong>and</strong> K.-H. Kubeczka, 1996. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> inhibitory data <strong>of</strong> essential oil constituents obtained with<br />
different microbiological testing methods. In <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>: Basic <strong>and</strong> Applied Research. Proc. 27th Int.<br />
Symp. on <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, C. Franz, A. Mathe, <strong>and</strong> G. Buchbauer, eds, pp. 33–36. Carol Stream: Allured<br />
Publishing Corporation.<br />
Pauli, A., R. Wölfel, <strong>and</strong> H. Schilcher, 2007. Fallbeispiel mit (-)-alpha-Bisabolol zur Beh<strong>and</strong>lung einer infizierten<br />
Hüft-Endoprothese. Kompl. Integr. Med., 48: 35–38.<br />
Pauli, A. <strong>and</strong> H. Schilcher, 2009. Anwendungsbeobachtungen mit dem Kamilleninhaltsst<strong>of</strong>f (-)-a-Bisabolol.<br />
Infektionen, Entzündungen, Wunden: 18 Fallbeispiele zu (-)-alpha-Bisabolol. Kompl. Integr. Med., 50:<br />
27–31.<br />
Pawar, V.C. <strong>and</strong> V.S. Thaker, 2006. In vitro efficacy <strong>of</strong> 75 essential oils against Aspergillus niger. Mycoses, 49:<br />
316–323.<br />
Pawar, V.C. <strong>and</strong> V.S. Thaker, 2007. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the anti-Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicer <strong>and</strong> anti-Alternaria<br />
porri effects <strong>of</strong> some essential oils. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 23: 1099–1106.<br />
Peana A., Moretti M., <strong>and</strong> C. Julidano, 1999. Chemical composition <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial action <strong>of</strong> the essential<br />
oils <strong>of</strong> Salvia desoleana <strong>and</strong> S. sclarea. Planta Med., 65: 751–754.<br />
Pellecuer, J., J. Allegrini, <strong>and</strong> M.S. DeBuochberg, 1976. Bactericidal <strong>and</strong> fungicidal essential oils. Revue de<br />
l’Institut Pasteur de Lyon, 9: 135–159.<br />
Pellecuer, J., M. Jacob, S.M. DeBuochberg, et al., 1980. Tests on the use <strong>of</strong> the essential oils <strong>of</strong> Mediterranean<br />
aromatic plants in conservative odontology. Plantes medicinales et phytotherapie, 14: 83–98.<br />
Perrucci, S., F. Mancianti, P.-L. Cioni, et al., 1994. In vitro antifungal activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils against some<br />
isolates <strong>of</strong> Mycrosporum canis <strong>and</strong> Microsporum gypseum. Planta Med., 60: 184–186.<br />
Pitarokili, D. <strong>and</strong> M. Couladis, N. Petsikos-Panayotarou, et al., 2002. Composition <strong>and</strong> antifungal activity<br />
on soil-borne pathogens <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Salvia sclarea from Greece. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50:<br />
6688–6691.<br />
Pizsolitto, A.C., B. Mancini, S.E. Longo Fracalanzza, et al., 1975. Determination <strong>of</strong> antibacterial activity <strong>of</strong><br />
essential oils <strong>of</strong>ficialized by the Brazilian pharmacopeia, 2nd Edition. Revista da Faculdade de Farmacia<br />
e Odontologia de Araraquara., 9: 55–61.<br />
Prasad, G., A. Kumar, A.K. Singh, et al., 1986. Antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>of</strong> some Ocimum species<br />
<strong>and</strong> clove oil. Fitoterapia, 57: 429–432.<br />
Rahalison, L., M. Hamburger, M. Monod, et al., 1994. Antifungal tests in phytochemical investigations:<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> bioautographic methods using phytopathogenic <strong>and</strong> human pathogenic fungi. Planta<br />
Med., 60: 41–44.
546 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Raman, A., U. Weir, <strong>and</strong> S.F. Bloomfield, 1995. Antimicrobial effects <strong>of</strong> tea-tree oil <strong>and</strong> its major components<br />
on Staphylococcus aureus, Staph. epidermidis <strong>and</strong> Propionibacterium acnes. Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 21:<br />
242–245.<br />
Ranasinghe, L., B. Jayawardena, <strong>and</strong> K. Abeywickrama,. 2002. Fungicidal activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>of</strong><br />
Cinnamomum zeylanicum (L.) <strong>and</strong> Syzygium aromaticum (L.) Merr et L.M. Perry against crown rot <strong>and</strong><br />
anthracnose pathogens isolated from banana. Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 35: 208–211.<br />
Reiss, J., 1982. Einfluss von Zimtrinde auf Wachstum und Toxinbildung von Schimmelpilzen auf Brot und auf<br />
die Bildung von Mykotoxinen. Getreide, Mehl, Brot, 36: 50–53.<br />
Remmal, A., T. Bouchikhi, K. Rhayour, et al., 1993. Improved method for the determination <strong>of</strong> antimicrobial<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils in agar medium. J. Essent. Oil Res., 5: 179–184.<br />
Rideal, S. <strong>and</strong> J.T.A. Walker, 1903. St<strong>and</strong>ardisation <strong>of</strong> disinfectants. J. Roy. Sanitary Soc., 24: 424–441.<br />
Rossi, P.-G., L. Berti, J. Panighi, et al., 2007. Antibacterial action <strong>of</strong> essential oils from Corsica. J. Essent. Oil<br />
Res., 19: 176–182.<br />
Rota, C., J.J. Carraminana, J. Burillo, et al., 2004. In vitro antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils from aromatic<br />
plants against selected foodborne pathogens. J. Food Prot., 67: 1252–1256.<br />
Saikia, D., S.P.S. Khanuja, A.P. Kahol, et al. 2001. Comparative antifungal activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> constituents<br />
from three distinct genotypes <strong>of</strong> CMYBopogon sp. Current <strong>Science</strong>, 80: 1264–1266.<br />
Saksena, N.K. <strong>and</strong> S. Saksena, 1984. Enhancement in the antifungal activity <strong>of</strong> some essential oils in combination<br />
against some dermatophytes. Indian Perf., 28: 42–45.<br />
Sarbhoy, A.K., J.L. Varshney, M.L. Maheshwari, et al., 1978. Effect <strong>of</strong> some essential oils <strong>and</strong> their constituents<br />
on few ubiquitous moulds. Zentralbl. Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde Infektionskrankheiten, 133:<br />
732–734.<br />
Schales, C., H. Gerlach, <strong>and</strong> Kosters, J., 1993. Investigations on the antibacterial effect <strong>of</strong> conifer needle oils<br />
on bacteria isolated from the feces <strong>of</strong> captive Capercaillies (Tetrao urogallus L., 1758). J. Veter. Med. Ser.<br />
B, 40: 381–390.<br />
Schelz, Z., J. Molnar, <strong>and</strong> J. Hohmann. 2006. Antimicrobial <strong>and</strong> antiplasmid activities <strong>of</strong> essential oils.<br />
Fitoterapia, 77: 279–285.<br />
Shapiro, S., A. Meier, <strong>and</strong> B. Guggenheim, 1994. The antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> essential oil<br />
components towards oral bacteria. Oral Microbiol. Immunol., 9: 202–208.<br />
Sharma, S.K. <strong>and</strong> V.P. Singh, 1979. The antifungal activity <strong>of</strong> some essential oils. Indian Drugs Pharm. Ind.,<br />
14: 3–6.<br />
Shin, S., 2003. Anti-Aspergillus activities <strong>of</strong> plant essential oils <strong>and</strong> their combination effects with ketoconazole<br />
or amphotericin B. Arch. Pharmacol. Res., 26: 389–393.<br />
Shukla, H.S. <strong>and</strong> S.C. Tripathi, 1987. Antifungal substance in the essential oil <strong>of</strong> anise (Pimpinella anisum L.).<br />
Agric. Biol. Chem., 51: 1991–1993.<br />
Singh, G., S. Maurya, M.P. deLampasona, et al., 2006. Chemical constituents, antimicrobial investigations <strong>and</strong><br />
antioxidative potential <strong>of</strong> volatile oil <strong>and</strong> acetone extract <strong>of</strong> star anise fruits. J. Sci. Food Agric., 86:<br />
111–121.<br />
Singh, G., S. Maurya, M.P. DeLampasona, et al., 2007. A comparison <strong>of</strong> chemical, antioxidant <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial<br />
studies <strong>of</strong> cinnamon leaf <strong>and</strong> bark volatile oils, oleoresins <strong>and</strong> their constituents. Food Chem. Toxicol.,<br />
45: 1650–1661.<br />
Smith-Palmer, A., J. Stewart, <strong>and</strong> L. Fyfe, 1998. Antimicrobial properties <strong>of</strong> plant essential oils <strong>and</strong> essences<br />
against five important food-borne pathogens. Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 26: 118–122.<br />
Smyth, H.F. <strong>and</strong> H.F. Jr. Smyth, 1932. Action <strong>of</strong> pine oil on some fungi <strong>of</strong> the skin. Arch. Dermat. Syphiol., 26:<br />
1079–1085.<br />
Soliman, K.M. <strong>and</strong> R.I. Badeaa, 2002. Effect <strong>of</strong> oil extracted from some medicinal plants on different mycotoxigenic<br />
fungi. Food Chem. Toxicol., 40: 1669–1675.<br />
Subba, M.S., T.C. Soumithri, <strong>and</strong> R. Suryanarayana Rao, 1967. Antimicrobial action <strong>of</strong> citrus oils. J. Food Sci.,<br />
32: 225–227.<br />
Suhr, K.I. <strong>and</strong> P.V. Nielsen, 2003. Antifungal activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils evaluated by two different application<br />
techniques against rye bread spoilage fungi. J. Appl. Microbiol., 94: 665–674.<br />
Szalontai, M., G. Verzar-Petri, <strong>and</strong> E. Florian, 1977. Beitrag zur Untersuchung der antimykotischen Wirkung<br />
biologisch aktiver Komponenten der Matricaria chamomilla. Parfum. Kosmet., 58: 121–127.<br />
Thanaboripat, D., N. Mongkontanawut, Y. Suvathi, et al., 2004. Inhibition <strong>of</strong> aflatoxin production <strong>and</strong> growth<br />
<strong>of</strong> Aspergillus fl avus by citronella oil. KMITL Sci. Technol., 4: 1–8.<br />
Thompson, D.P., 1986. Effect <strong>of</strong> some essential oils on spore germination <strong>of</strong> Rhizopus, Mucor <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus<br />
species. Mycologia, 78: 482.
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 547<br />
Thompson, D.P. <strong>and</strong> C. Cannon, 1986. Toxicity <strong>of</strong> essential oils on toxigenic <strong>and</strong> nontoxigenic fungi. Bull.<br />
Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 36: 527–532.<br />
Tullio, V., A. Nostro, N. M<strong>and</strong>ras, et al., 2006. Antifungal activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils against filamentous fungi<br />
determined by broth microdilution <strong>and</strong> vapour contact methods. J. Appl. Microbiol., 102: 1544–1550.<br />
Wannissorn, B., S. Jarikasem, T. Siriwangchai, et al., 2005. Antibacterial properties <strong>of</strong> essential oils from Thai<br />
medicinal plants. Fitoterapia, 76: 233–236.<br />
Warnke, P.H., E. Sherry, P.A.J. Russo, et al., 2005. Antibacterial essential oils reduce tumor smell <strong>and</strong> inflammation<br />
in cancer patients. J. Clinic. Oncol., 23: 1588–1589.<br />
Weis, N., 1986. Zur Wirkweise von Terpenoiden auf den Energiest<strong>of</strong>fwechsel von Bakterien: Wirkung auf<br />
respiratorischen Elektronentransport und oxidative Phoshorylierung. Dissertation. Erlangen: Friedrich-<br />
Alex<strong>and</strong>er Universität.<br />
Weseler, A., H.K. Geiss, R. Saller, et al., 2005. A novel colorimetric broth microdilution method to determine<br />
the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) <strong>of</strong> antibiotics <strong>and</strong> essential oils against Helicobacter pylori.<br />
Pharmazie, 60: 498–502.<br />
Yousef, R.T. <strong>and</strong> G.G. Tawil, 1980. Antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> volatile oils. Pharmazie, 35: 698–701.<br />
Yousefzadi, M., A. Sonboli, F. Karimic, et al., 2007. Antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> some Salvia species essential oils<br />
from Iran. Zeitschr. Naturforsch. C., 62: 514–518.
13<br />
Aromatherapy with<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Maria Lis-Balchin<br />
CONTENTS<br />
13.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 550<br />
13.1.1 Aromatherapy Practice in the United Kingdom <strong>and</strong> the United States ............. 550<br />
13.2 Definitions <strong>of</strong> Aromatherapy .......................................................................................... 550<br />
13.3 Introduction to Aromatherapy Concepts ......................................................................... 551<br />
13.3.1 Aromatherapy, Aromatology, <strong>and</strong> Aromachology ............................................. 551<br />
13.3.2 Scientifically Accepted Benefits <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> versus the<br />
Lack <strong>of</strong> Evidence for Aromatherapy .................................................................. 551<br />
13.4 Historical Background to Aromatherapy ........................................................................ 553<br />
13.4.1 Scented Plants used as Incense in Ancient Egypt ............................................. 554<br />
13.5 Perfume <strong>and</strong> Cosmetics: Precursors <strong>of</strong> Cosmetological Aromatherapy ......................... 554<br />
13.5.1 Three Methods <strong>of</strong> Producing Perfumed <strong>Oils</strong> by the Egyptians ........................ 555<br />
13.6 Medicinal Uses: Precursors <strong>of</strong> Aromatology or “Clinical” Aromatherapy .................... 555<br />
13.6.1 Middle Ages: Use <strong>of</strong> Aromatics <strong>and</strong> Quacks ..................................................... 556<br />
13.7 Modern Perfumery .......................................................................................................... 557<br />
13.8 Aromatherapy Practice ................................................................................................... 557<br />
13.8.1 Methods <strong>of</strong> Application <strong>of</strong> Aromatherapy Treatment ........................................ 558<br />
13.9 Massage using <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> .......................................................................................... 559<br />
13.9.1 Massage Techniques .......................................................................................... 559<br />
13.10 Aromatherapy: Blending <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> ..................................................................... 561<br />
13.10.1 Fixed <strong>Oils</strong> ........................................................................................................... 561<br />
13.11 Internal Usage <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> by Aromatherapists ..................................................... 561<br />
13.12 Use <strong>of</strong> Pure or Synthetic Components ............................................................................ 562<br />
13.13 Therapeutic Claims for the Application <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> .............................................. 562<br />
13.13.1 False Claims Challenged in Court ..................................................................... 563<br />
13.14 Physiological <strong>and</strong> Psychological Responses to <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> <strong>and</strong> Psychophysiology .... 563<br />
13.15 Placebo Effect <strong>of</strong> Aromatherapy ..................................................................................... 564<br />
13.16 Safety Issue in Aromatherapy ......................................................................................... 565<br />
13.17 Toxicity in Humans ......................................................................................................... 566<br />
13.17.1 Increase in Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Recent Years .................................. 566<br />
13.17.2 Photosensitizers .................................................................................................. 567<br />
13.17.3 Commonest Allergenic <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> <strong>and</strong> Components ................................... 567<br />
13.17.4 Toxicity in Young Children: A Special Case ..................................................... 568<br />
13.17.5 Selected Toxicities <strong>of</strong> Common <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> <strong>and</strong> Their Components ............ 568<br />
13.18 Clinical Studies <strong>of</strong> Aromatherapy .................................................................................. 569<br />
13.19 Recent Clinical Studies ................................................................................................... 570<br />
13.19.1 Aromatherapy in Dementia ................................................................................ 570<br />
549
550 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
13.20 Past Clinical Studies ....................................................................................................... 571<br />
13.20.1 Critique <strong>of</strong> Selected Clinical Trials ................................................................... 572<br />
13.21 Use <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> Mainly as Chemical Agents <strong>and</strong> Not for Their Odor ................... 575<br />
13.21.1 Single-Case Studies .......................................................................................... 576<br />
13.22 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 576<br />
References .................................................................................................................................. 577<br />
13.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
13.1.1 AROMATHERAPY PRACTICE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE UNITED STATES<br />
Aromatherapy has become more <strong>of</strong> an art than a science. This is mostly due to the health <strong>and</strong> beauty<br />
industries, which have taken over the original concept as a money-spinner in the United Kingdom,<br />
United States, <strong>and</strong> almost all other parts <strong>of</strong> the world. There are virtually thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> “aromatherapy”<br />
products in pharmacies, high street shops, supermarkets, hair salons, <strong>and</strong> beauty salons.<br />
The products are supposedly made with “essential oils” (which are usually perfumes) <strong>and</strong> include<br />
skin creams, hair shampoos, shower gels, moisturizers, bath salts, lotions, c<strong>and</strong>les, as well as essential<br />
oils themselves.<br />
Many aromatherapy products, such as perfumes, are also linked with sexual attractiveness. There<br />
are numerous “health <strong>and</strong> beauty” salons or clinics that <strong>of</strong>fer aromatherapy as part <strong>of</strong> their “treatments”<br />
together with waxing, electrolysis, massage (<strong>of</strong> various types, including “no-h<strong>and</strong>s massage”),<br />
facial treatments including botox, manicures <strong>and</strong> pedicures, eyes <strong>and</strong> eyebrow shaping, ear-piercing,<br />
tanning, <strong>and</strong> makeup application. Often hundreds <strong>of</strong> these “therapies” are <strong>of</strong>fered in one small shop,<br />
with aromatherapy thrown in. Most people, especially men, consider aromatherapy to be a sensual<br />
massage with some perfumes given all over the body by a young lady. This is <strong>of</strong>ten the case, although<br />
aromatherapy massage is <strong>of</strong>ten provided just on the back or even just on the face <strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong>s for busy<br />
people. The use <strong>of</strong> pure essential oils both in such beauty massage <strong>and</strong> all the aromatherapy products<br />
on sale everywhere is very doubtful (because <strong>of</strong> the cost) but the purchaser believes the advertisements<br />
assuring pure oil usage. Beauty consultants/therapists use massage skills <strong>and</strong> a nice odor<br />
simply for relaxation; they sometimes include beautifying treatments using specific essential oils as<br />
initiated by Marguerite Maury (1989). Aromatherapy has thus become an art.<br />
However, aromatherapists (who have studied the “science” for 3 h, a week, a year, or even did a<br />
3-year degree) are keen to bring science into this alternative “treatment.” The multitude <strong>of</strong> books<br />
written on the subject, aromatherapy journals, <strong>and</strong> the web sites all consider that there has been<br />
enough pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the scientific merit <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy. They quote studies that have shown no positive<br />
or statistically significant effects as pro<strong>of</strong> that aromatherapy works. The actual validity <strong>of</strong> these<br />
claims will be discussed later <strong>and</strong> several publications criticized this on scientific grounds.<br />
Aromatherapy is <strong>of</strong>ten combined with “counseling” by a “qualified” therapist, with no counseling<br />
qualifications. Massaging is carried out using very diluted plant essential oils (2–5 drops per 10 mL<br />
<strong>of</strong> carrier oil, such as almond oil) on the skin—that is, in almost homeopathic dilutions! But they<br />
believe that the essential oils are absorbed <strong>and</strong> go straight to the target organ where they exert the<br />
healing effect. Many aromatherapists combine their practice with cosmology, crystals, colors, music,<br />
<strong>and</strong> so on. These may also be associated with a commercial sideline in selling “own trademark”<br />
essential oils <strong>and</strong> associated items, including diffusers, scented c<strong>and</strong>les, <strong>and</strong> scented jewelry.<br />
13.2 DEFINITIONS OF AROMATHERAPY<br />
Aromatherapy is defined as “the use <strong>of</strong> aromatic plant extracts <strong>and</strong> essential oils in massage <strong>and</strong> other<br />
treatment” (Concise Oxford Dictionary, 1995). However, there is no mention <strong>of</strong> massage or the<br />
absorption <strong>of</strong> essential oils through the skin <strong>and</strong> their effect on the target organ (which is the mainframe
Aromatherapy with <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 551<br />
<strong>of</strong> aromatherapy in the United Kingdom <strong>and</strong> the United States) in Aromatherapie (Gattefossé, 1937/1993).<br />
This was where the term “aromatherapy” was coined after all, by the “father <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy”—but<br />
was actually based on the odor <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> perfumes <strong>and</strong> their antimicrobial, physiological, <strong>and</strong><br />
cosmetological properties (Gattefossé, 1928, 1952, 1937/1993). “Pure” essential oils were <strong>of</strong> no concern<br />
to Gattefossé. Recently, definitions have begun to encompass the effects <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy on the mind<br />
as well as on the body (Lawless, 1994; Worwood, 1996, 1998; Hirsch, 1998).<br />
13.3 INTRODUCTION TO AROMATHERAPY CONCEPTS<br />
The original concept <strong>of</strong> modern aromatherapy was based on the assumption that the volatile, fatsoluble<br />
essential oil was equivalent in bioactivity to that <strong>of</strong> the whole plant when inhaled or massaged<br />
onto the skin. Information about the medicinal <strong>and</strong> other properties <strong>of</strong> the plants was taken<br />
from old English herbals (e.g., Culpeper, 1653), combined with some more esoteric nuances involving<br />
the planets <strong>and</strong> astrology (Tisser<strong>and</strong>, 1977).<br />
This notion is clearly flawed. As an example, a whole orange differs from just the essential oil<br />
(extracted from the rind alone) as the water-soluble vitamins (thiamine, rib<strong>of</strong>lavin, nicotinic acid, <strong>and</strong><br />
vitamins C <strong>and</strong> A) are excluded, as are calcium, iron, proteins, carbohydrates, <strong>and</strong> water. Substantial<br />
differences in bioactivity are found in different fractions <strong>of</strong> plants, for example, the essential oils <strong>of</strong><br />
Pelargonium species produced a consistent relaxation <strong>of</strong> the smooth muscle <strong>of</strong> the guinea pig in vitro,<br />
whereas the water-soluble extracts did not (Lis-Balchin, 2002b). Botanical misinterpretations are<br />
also common in many aromatherapy books, for example, “geranium oil” bioactivity is based on Herb<br />
Robert, a hardy Geranium species found widely in European hedgerows, whereas geranium oil is<br />
distilled from species <strong>of</strong> the South African genus Pelargonium (Lis-Balchin, 2002a).<br />
13.3.1 AROMATHERAPY, AROMATOLOGY, AND AROMACHOLOGY<br />
Aromatherapy can now be divided into three “sciences”: aromatherapy, aromatology, <strong>and</strong><br />
aromachology.<br />
Aromachology [coined by the Sense <strong>of</strong> Smell Institute (SSI), USA, 1982] is based on the interrelationship<br />
<strong>of</strong> psychology <strong>and</strong> odor, that is, its effect on specific feelings (e.g., relaxation, exhilaration,<br />
sensuality, happiness, <strong>and</strong> achievement) by its direct effect on the brain.<br />
Aromatherapy is defined by the SSI as “the therapeutic effects <strong>of</strong> aromas on physical conditions<br />
(such as menstrual disorders, digestive problems, etc.) as well as psychological conditions (such as<br />
chronic depression).” The odor being composed <strong>of</strong> a mixture <strong>of</strong> fat-soluble chemicals may thus have<br />
an effect on the brain via inhalation, skin absorption, or even directly via the nose.<br />
Aromatology is concerned with the internal use <strong>of</strong> oils (SSI). This is similar to the use <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy<br />
in most <strong>of</strong> Europe, excluding the United Kingdom; it includes the effect <strong>of</strong> the chemicals<br />
in the essential oils via oral intake, or via the anus, vagina, or any other possible opening by medically<br />
qualified doctors or at least herbalists, using essential oils as internal medicines.<br />
There is a vast difference between aromatherapy in the United Kingdom <strong>and</strong> that in continental<br />
Europe (aromatology): the former is “alternative” while the latter is “conventional.” The “alternative”<br />
aromatherapy is largely based on “healing,” which is largely based on belief (Millenson, 1995;<br />
Benson <strong>and</strong> Stark, 1996; Lis-Balchin, 1997). This is credited with a substantial placebo influence.<br />
However, the placebo effect can be responsible for results in both procedures.<br />
13.3.2 SCIENTIFICALLY ACCEPTED BENEFITS OF ESSENTIAL OILS VERSUS THE LACK OF EVIDENCE<br />
FOR AROMATHERAPY<br />
There is virtually no scientific evidence, as yet, regarding the direct action <strong>of</strong> essential oils, applied<br />
through massage on the skin, on specific internal organs—rather than through the odor pathway<br />
leading into the mid-brain’s “limbic system” <strong>and</strong> then through the normal sympathetic <strong>and</strong>
552 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
parasympathetic pathways. This is despite some evidence that certain components <strong>of</strong> essential oils<br />
can be absorbed either through the skin or lungs (Buchbauer et al., 1992; Jager et al., 1992; Fuchs<br />
et al., 1997).<br />
Many fragrances have been shown to have an effect on mood <strong>and</strong>, in general, pleasant odors<br />
generate happy memories, more positive feelings, <strong>and</strong> a general sense <strong>of</strong> well-being (Knasko et al.,<br />
1990; Knasko, 1992; Warren <strong>and</strong> Warrenburg, 1993) just like perfumes. Many essential oil vapors<br />
have been shown to depress contingent negative variation (CNV) brain waves in human volunteers<br />
<strong>and</strong> these are considered to be sedative (Torii et al., 1988). Others increase CNV <strong>and</strong> are considered<br />
stimulants (Kubota et al., 1992). An individual with anosmia showed changes in cerebral blood flow<br />
on inhaling certain essential oils, just as in people able to smell (Buchbauer et al., 1993c), showing<br />
that the oil had a positive brain effect despite the patient’s inability to smell it. There is some evidence<br />
that certain essential oils (e.g., nutmeg) can lower high blood pressure (Warren <strong>and</strong> Warrenburg,<br />
1993). Externally applied essential oils (e.g., tea tree) can reduce/eliminate acne (Bassett et al.,<br />
1990) <strong>and</strong> athlete’s foot (Tong et al., 1992). This happens, however, using conventional chemical<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> essential oils rather than aromatherapy.<br />
Most clients seeking out aromatherapy are suffering from some stress-related conditions, <strong>and</strong><br />
improvement is largely achieved through relaxation. An alleviation <strong>of</strong> suffering <strong>and</strong> possibly pain,<br />
due to gentle massage <strong>and</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> someone who cares <strong>and</strong> listens to the patient, could be<br />
beneficial in such cases as in cases <strong>of</strong> terminal cancer; the longer the time spent by the therapist with<br />
the patient, the stronger the belief imparted by the therapist <strong>and</strong> the greater the willingness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
patient to believe in the therapy, the greater the effect achieved (Benson <strong>and</strong> Stark, 1996). There is<br />
a need for this kind <strong>of</strong> healing contact, <strong>and</strong> aromatherapy with its added power <strong>of</strong> odor fits this<br />
niche, as the main action <strong>of</strong> essential oils is probably on the primitive, unconscious, limbic system<br />
<strong>of</strong> the brain (Lis-Balchin, 1997), which is not under the control <strong>of</strong> the cerebrum or higher centers<br />
<strong>and</strong> has a considerable subconscious effect on the person. However, as mood <strong>and</strong> behavior can be<br />
influenced by odors, <strong>and</strong> memories <strong>of</strong> past odor associations could also be dominant, aromatherapy<br />
should not be used by aromatherapists, unqualified in psychology, <strong>and</strong> so on in the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
Alzheimer’s or other diseases <strong>of</strong> aging (Lis-Balchin, 2006).<br />
Proven uses <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> their components are found in industry, for example, foods,<br />
cosmetic products, household products, <strong>and</strong> so on. They impart the required odor or flavor to food,<br />
cosmetics <strong>and</strong> perfumery, tobacco, <strong>and</strong> textiles. <strong>Essential</strong> oils are also used in the paint industry,<br />
which capitalizes on the exceptional “cleaning” properties <strong>of</strong> certain oils. This, together with their<br />
embalming properties, suggests that essential oils are very potent <strong>and</strong> dangerous chemicals—not<br />
the sort <strong>of</strong> natural products to massage into the skin!<br />
Why, therefore, should essential oils be <strong>of</strong> great medicinal value? They are, after all, just<br />
chemicals. However, essential oils have many functions in everyday life ranging from their use<br />
in dentistry (e.g., cinnamon <strong>and</strong> clove oils), as decongestants (e.g., Eucalyptus globulus, camphor,<br />
peppermint, <strong>and</strong> cajuput) to their use as mouthwashes (e.g., thyme), also external usage as<br />
hyperemics (e.g., rosemary, turpentine, <strong>and</strong> camphor) <strong>and</strong> anti-inflammatories (e.g., German<br />
chamomile <strong>and</strong> yarrow). Some essential oils are used internally as stimulants <strong>of</strong> digestion (e.g.,<br />
anise, peppermint, <strong>and</strong> cinnamon) <strong>and</strong> as diuretics (e.g., buchu <strong>and</strong> juniper oils) (Lis-Balchin,<br />
2006).<br />
Many plant essential oils are extremely potent antimicrobials in vitro (Deans <strong>and</strong> Ritchie, 1987;<br />
Bassett et al., 1990; Lis-Balchin, 1995; Lis-Balchin et al., 1996; Deans, 2002). Many are also strong<br />
antioxidant agents <strong>and</strong> have recently been shown to stop some <strong>of</strong> the symptoms <strong>of</strong> aging in animals<br />
(Dorman et al., 1995a, 1995b). The use <strong>of</strong> camphor, turpentine oils, <strong>and</strong> their components as rubefacients,<br />
causing increased blood flow to a site <strong>of</strong> pain or swelling when applied to the skin, is well<br />
known <strong>and</strong> is the basis <strong>of</strong> many well-known medicaments such as Vicks VapoRub <strong>and</strong> Tiger Balm.<br />
Some essential oils are already used as orthodox medicines: peppermint oil is used for treating<br />
irritable bowel syndrome <strong>and</strong> some components <strong>of</strong> essential oils, such as pinene, limonene, camphene,<br />
<strong>and</strong> borneol, given orally have been found to be effective against certain internal ailments,
Aromatherapy with <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 553<br />
such as gallstones (Somerville et al., 1985) <strong>and</strong> ureteric stones (Engelstein et al., 1992). Many essential<br />
oils have been shown to be active on many different animal tissues in vitro (Lis-Balchin et al.,<br />
1997b). There are many examples <strong>of</strong> the benefits <strong>of</strong> using essential oils by topical application for<br />
acne, Alopecia areata, <strong>and</strong> Athlete’s foot (discussed later in Section 13.21), but this is a treatment<br />
using chemicals rather than aromatherapy treatment.<br />
Future scientific studies, such as those on Alzheimer’s syndrome (Perry et al., 1998, 1999), may<br />
reveal the individual benefits <strong>of</strong> different essential oils for different ailments, but in practice this<br />
may not be <strong>of</strong> utmost importance as aromatherapy massage for relief from stress. Aromatherapy has<br />
had very little scientific evaluation to date. As with so many alternative therapies, the placebo effect<br />
may provide the largest percentage benefit to the patient (Benson <strong>and</strong> Stark, 1996). Many aromatherapists<br />
have not been greatly interested in scientific research <strong>and</strong> some have even been antagonistic<br />
to any such research (Vickers, 1996; Lis-Balchin, 1997). Animal experiments, whether maze<br />
studies using mice or pharmacology using isolated tissues, are considered unacceptable <strong>and</strong> only<br />
essential oils that are “untested on animals” are acceptable, despite all essential oils having been<br />
already tested on animals (denied by assurances <strong>of</strong> essential oil suppliers) because this is required<br />
by law before they can be used in foods.<br />
The actual mode <strong>of</strong> action <strong>of</strong> essential oils in vivo is still far from clear, <strong>and</strong> clinical studies to<br />
date have been scarce <strong>and</strong> mostly rather negative (Stevenson, 1994; Dunn et al., 1995; Brooker et al.,<br />
1997; Anderson et al., 2000). The advent <strong>of</strong> scientific input into the clinical studies, rather than<br />
aromatherapist-led studies, has recently yielded some more positive <strong>and</strong> scientifically acceptable<br />
data (Smallwood et al., 2001; Ballard et al., 2002; Burns et al., 2000; Holmes et al., 2002; Kennedy<br />
et al., 2002). The main difficulty in clinical studies is that it is virtually impossible to do r<strong>and</strong>omized<br />
double-blind studies involving different odors as it is almost impossible to provide an adequate<br />
control as this would have to be either odorless or else <strong>of</strong> a different odor, neither <strong>of</strong> which is satisfactory.<br />
In aromatherapy, as practiced, there is a variation in the treatment for each client, based on<br />
“holistic” principles, <strong>and</strong> each person can be treated by an aromatherapist with one to five or more<br />
different essential oil mixtures on subsequent visits, involving one to four or more different essential<br />
oils in each mixture. This makes scientific evaluation almost useless, as seen by studies during<br />
childbirth (Burns <strong>and</strong> Blaney, 1994; see also Section 13.19). There is also the belief among alternative<br />
medicine practitioners that if the procedure “works” in one patient, there is no need to study<br />
it using scientific double-blind procedures. There is therefore a great bias when clinical studies in<br />
aromatherapy are conducted largely by aromatherapists.<br />
Recent European regulations (the seventh Amendment to the European Cosmetic Directive<br />
76/768/EEC, 2002; see Appendices 27 <strong>and</strong> 28) have listed 26 sensitizers found in most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
common essential oils used: this could be a problem for aromatherapists as well as clients, both in<br />
possibly causing sensitization <strong>and</strong> also resulting in legal action regarding such an eventuality in the<br />
case <strong>of</strong> the client. Care must be taken regarding the sensitization potential <strong>of</strong> the essential oils, especially<br />
when massaging patients with cancer or otherwise sensitive skin. It should also be borne in<br />
mind when considering the use <strong>of</strong> essential oils during childbirth <strong>and</strong> in other clinical studies (Burns<br />
<strong>and</strong> Blaney, 1994; Burns et al., 2000) that studies in animals have indicated that some oils cause a<br />
decrease in uterine contractions (Lis-Balchin <strong>and</strong> Hart, 1997).<br />
13.4 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND TO AROMATHERAPY<br />
The advent <strong>of</strong> “aromatherapy” has been attributed to both the Ancient Egyptians <strong>and</strong> Chinese over<br />
4500 years ago, as scented plants <strong>and</strong> their products were used in religious practices, as medicines,<br />
perfumes, <strong>and</strong> embalming agents (Manniche, 1989, 1999), <strong>and</strong> to bring out greater sexuality (Schumann<br />
Antelme <strong>and</strong> Rossini, 2001). But essential oils as such were unlikely to have been used. In Ancient<br />
Egypt, crude plant extracts <strong>of</strong> frankincense, myrrh, or galbanum, <strong>and</strong> so on were used in an oily<br />
vegetable or animal fat that was massaged onto the bodies <strong>of</strong> workers building the pyramids or the<br />
rich proletariat after their baths (Manniche, 1999). These contained essential oils, water-soluble
554 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
extractives, <strong>and</strong> pigments. Incense smoke from resinous plant material provided a more sacrosanct<br />
atmosphere for making sacrifices, both animal <strong>and</strong> human, to the gods. The incense was <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
mixed with narcotics like cannabis to anesthetize the sacrificial animals, especially with humans<br />
(Devereux, 1997). The frankincense extract in oils (citrusy odor) was entirely different to that burnt<br />
(church-like) in chemical composition (Arct<strong>and</strong>er, 1960), <strong>and</strong> therefore would have entirely different<br />
functions.<br />
13.4.1 SCENTED PLANTS USED AS INCENSE IN ANCIENT EGYPT<br />
Frankincense (Boswellia carterii; Boswellia thurifera) (Burseraceae), Myrrh (Commiphora myrrha;<br />
Balsamodendron myrrha; Balsamodendron opobalsamum) (Burseraceae), Labdanum (Cistus<br />
ladaniferus), Galbanum (Ferula galbaniflua), Styrax (Styrax <strong>of</strong>ficinalis), or Liquidambar orientalis,<br />
Balm <strong>of</strong> Gilhead (Commiphora opobalsamum), S<strong>and</strong>alwood (Santalum album), <strong>and</strong> Opoponax<br />
(Opoponax chironium).<br />
Uses included various concoctions <strong>of</strong> kyphi, burnt three times a day to the sun god Ra: morning,<br />
noon, <strong>and</strong> sunset, in order for him to come back. The ingredients included raisins, juniper, cinnamon,<br />
honey, wine, frankincense, myrrh, burnt resins, cyperus, sweet rust, sweet flag, <strong>and</strong> aspalanthus<br />
in a certain secret proportion (Loret, 1887; Manniche, 1989; Forbes, 1955), as shown on the<br />
walls <strong>of</strong> the laboratory in the temples <strong>of</strong> Horus at Edfu <strong>and</strong> Philae. Embalming involved odorous<br />
plants such as juniper, cassia, cinnamon, cedarwood, <strong>and</strong> myrrh, together with natron to preserve<br />
the body <strong>and</strong> ensure safe passage to the afterlife. The b<strong>and</strong>ages in which the mummy was wrapped<br />
were drenched in stacte (oil <strong>of</strong> myrrh) <strong>and</strong> sprinkled with other spices (for further descriptions <strong>and</strong><br />
uses, see Lis-Balchin, 2006).<br />
The Chinese also used an incense, hsiang, meaning “aromatic,” made from a variety <strong>of</strong> plants,<br />
with s<strong>and</strong>alwood being particularly favored by Buddhists. In India, fragrant flowers including jasmine<br />
<strong>and</strong> the root <strong>of</strong> spikenard giving a sweet scent were used. The Hindus obtained cassia from<br />
China <strong>and</strong> were the first to organize trading routes to Arabia where frankincense was exclusively<br />
found. The Hebrews traditionally used incense for purification ceremonies. The use <strong>of</strong> incense probably<br />
spread to Greece from Egypt around the eighth century bc. The Indians <strong>of</strong> Mesoamerica used<br />
copal, a hard, lustrous resin, obtained from pine trees <strong>and</strong> various other tropical trees by slicing the<br />
bark (Olibanum americanum). Copal pellets bound to corn-husk tubes would be burnt in hollows on<br />
the summits <strong>of</strong> holy hills <strong>and</strong> mountains, <strong>and</strong> these places, blackened by centuries <strong>of</strong> such usage, are<br />
still resorted to by today’s Maya in Guatemala (Janson, 1997) <strong>and</strong> used medicinally to treat diseases<br />
<strong>of</strong> the respiratory system <strong>and</strong> the skin.<br />
Anointing also involves incense (Unterman, 1991). Queen Elizabeth II underwent the ritual in<br />
1953 at her coronation, with a composition <strong>of</strong> oils originated by Charles I: essential oils <strong>of</strong> roses,<br />
orange blossom, jasmine petals, sesame seeds, <strong>and</strong> cinnamon combined with gum benzoin, musk,<br />
civet, <strong>and</strong> ambergris were used (Ellis, 1960). Similarly, musk, s<strong>and</strong>alwood, <strong>and</strong> other fragrances<br />
were used by the Hindus to wash the effigies <strong>of</strong> their gods, <strong>and</strong> this custom was continued by the<br />
early Christians. This probably accounts for the divine odor frequently reported when the tombs <strong>of</strong><br />
early Christians were opened (Atchley <strong>and</strong> Cuthbert, 1909). The Christian Church was slow to<br />
adopt the use <strong>of</strong> incense until medieval times, when it was used for funerals (Genders, 1972). The<br />
reformation reversed the process as it was considered to be <strong>of</strong> pagan origin but it still survives in the<br />
Roman Catholic Church. Aromatic substances were also widely used in magic (Pinch, 1994).<br />
13.5 PERFUME AND COSMETICS: PRECURSORS OF COSMETOLOGICAL<br />
AROMATHERAPY<br />
The word “perfume” is derived from the Latin per fumare: “by smoke.” The preparation <strong>of</strong> perfumes<br />
in Ancient Egypt was done by the priests, who passed on their knowledge to new priests<br />
(Manniche, 1989, 1999). Both high-class people like Nefertiti <strong>and</strong> Cleopatra used huge amounts <strong>of</strong>
Aromatherapy with <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 555<br />
fragranced materials as unguents, powders, <strong>and</strong> perfumes <strong>and</strong> the workers building the great pyramids,<br />
who even went on strike when they were denied their allocation <strong>of</strong> “aromatherapy massage<br />
oil” (Manniche, 1999).<br />
13.5.1 THREE METHODS OF PRODUCING PERFUMED OILS BY THE EGYPTIANS<br />
Enfleurage involved steeping the flowers or aromatics in oils or animal fats (usually goat) until the<br />
scent from the materials was imparted to the fat. The impregnated fat was <strong>of</strong>ten molded into cosmetic<br />
cones <strong>and</strong> used for perfuming hair wigs, worn on festive occasions, which could last for 3<br />
days; the fat would s<strong>of</strong>ten <strong>and</strong> start melting, spreading the scented grease not only over the wig, but<br />
also over the clothes <strong>and</strong> body—more pleasing than the stench <strong>of</strong> stale wine, food, <strong>and</strong> excrement<br />
(Manniche, 1999).<br />
Maceration was used principally for skin creams <strong>and</strong> perfumes: flowers, herbs, spices, or resins<br />
were chopped up <strong>and</strong> immersed in hot oils. The oil was strained <strong>and</strong> poured into alabaster (calcite)<br />
containers <strong>and</strong> sealed with wax. These scented fatty extracts were also massaged onto the skin<br />
(Manniche, 1999).<br />
Expression involved putting flowers or herbs into bags or presses, which extracted the aromatic<br />
oils. Expression is now only used for citrus fruit oils (Lis-Balchin, 1995). Wine was <strong>of</strong>ten included<br />
in the process <strong>and</strong> the resulting potent liquid was stored in jars. These methods are still used<br />
today.<br />
Megaleion, an Ancient Greek perfume described by Theophrastus who believed it to be good for<br />
wounds, was made <strong>of</strong> burnt resins <strong>and</strong> balanos oil, <strong>and</strong> boiled for 10 days before adding cassia, cinnamon,<br />
<strong>and</strong> myrrh (Groom, 1992). Rose, marjoram, sage, lotus flower, <strong>and</strong> galbanum perfumes<br />
were also made. Apart from these, aromatic oils from basil, celery, chamomile, cumin, dill, fenugreek,<br />
fir, henna, iris, juniper, lily, lotus, m<strong>and</strong>rake, marjoram, myrtle, pine, rose, rue, <strong>and</strong> sage<br />
were sometimes used in perfumes or as medicines taken internally <strong>and</strong> externally.<br />
Dioscorides, in his De Materia Medica, discussed the components <strong>of</strong> perfumes <strong>and</strong> their medicinal<br />
properties, providing detailed perfume formulae. Alex<strong>and</strong>rian chemists were divided into three<br />
schools, one <strong>of</strong> which was the school <strong>of</strong> Maria the Jewess, which produced pieces <strong>of</strong> apparatus for<br />
distillation <strong>and</strong> sublimation, such as the bain Marie, useful for extracting the aromatic oils from<br />
plant material. Perfumes became more commonly known in medieval Europe as knights returning<br />
from the Crusades brought back musk, floral waters, <strong>and</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> spices.<br />
13.6 MEDICINAL USES: PRECURSORS OF AROMATOLOGY OR “CLINICAL”<br />
AROMATHERAPY<br />
The ancient use <strong>of</strong> plants, not essential oils, can be found in fragments <strong>of</strong> Egyptian herbals. The<br />
names <strong>of</strong> various plants, their habitats, characteristics, <strong>and</strong> the purposes for which they were used<br />
are included in the following: Veterinary papyrus (ca. 2000 b.c.), Gynaecological papyrus (ca.<br />
2000 b.c.), Papyrus Edwin Smith (an army surgeon’s manual, ca. 1600 b.c.), Papyrus Ebers<br />
(includes remedies for health, beauty, <strong>and</strong> the home, ca. 1600 b.c.), Papyrus Hearst (with prescriptions<br />
<strong>and</strong> spells, ca. 1400 b.c.), <strong>and</strong> Demotic medical papyri (second century b.c. to first<br />
century a.d.).<br />
Magic was <strong>of</strong>ten used as part <strong>of</strong> the treatment <strong>and</strong> gave the patient the expectation <strong>of</strong> a cure <strong>and</strong><br />
thus provided a placebo effect (Pinch, 1994). The term “placing the h<strong>and</strong>” appears frequently in a<br />
large number <strong>of</strong> medical papyri; this probably alludes to the manual examination in order to reach<br />
a diagnosis but could also imply cure by the “laying on <strong>of</strong> h<strong>and</strong>s,” or even both (Nunn, 1997). This<br />
could be the basis <strong>of</strong> modern massage (with or without aromatherapy). It is certainly the basis <strong>of</strong><br />
many alternative medicine practices at present (Lis-Balchin, 1997).<br />
Plants were used in numerous ways. Onions were made into a paste with wine <strong>and</strong> inserted into<br />
the vagina to stop a woman menstruating. Garlic ointment was used to keep away serpents <strong>and</strong>
556 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
snakes, heal dog-bites, <strong>and</strong> bruises; raw garlic was given to asthmatics; fresh garlic <strong>and</strong> cori<strong>and</strong>er in<br />
wine was a purgative <strong>and</strong> an aphrodisiac! Juniper mixed with honey <strong>and</strong> beer was used orally to<br />
encourage defecation; <strong>and</strong> origanum was boiled with hyssop for a sick ear (Manniche, 1989).<br />
Egyptians also practiced inhalation by using a double-pot arrangement whereby a heated<br />
stone was placed in one <strong>of</strong> the pots <strong>and</strong> a liquid herbal remedy poured over it. The second pot,<br />
with a hole in the bottom through which a straw was inserted, was placed on top <strong>of</strong> the first pot,<br />
allowing the patient to breathe in the steaming remedy (Manniche, 1989), that is, aromatherapy<br />
by inhalation.<br />
13.6.1 MIDDLE AGES: USE OF AROMATICS AND QUACKS<br />
In the twelfth century, the Benedictine Abbess Hildegard <strong>of</strong> Bingen (1098–1179) was authorized by<br />
the Church to publish her visions on medicine (Causae et Curae), dealing with the causes <strong>and</strong> remedies<br />
for illness (Brunn <strong>and</strong> Epiney-Burgard, 1989). The foul smell <strong>of</strong> refuse in European towns in<br />
the seventeenth century was thought to be the major cause <strong>of</strong> disease, including the plague (Classen<br />
et al., 1994), <strong>and</strong> aromatics were used for both preventing <strong>and</strong> in some cases curing diseases; herbs<br />
such as rosemary were in great dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> sold for exorbitant prices as a prophylactic against the<br />
plague (Wilson, 1925). People forced to live near victims <strong>of</strong> the plague would carry a pom<strong>and</strong>er,<br />
which contained a mixture <strong>of</strong> aromatic plant extracts. Medical practitioners carried a small cassolette<br />
or “perfume box” on the top <strong>of</strong> their walking sticks, when visiting contagious patients, which<br />
was filled with aromatics (Rimmel, 1865). Some physicians wore a device filled with herbs <strong>and</strong><br />
spices over their nose when they examined plague patients (Wilson, 1925). These became known as<br />
“beaks” <strong>and</strong> it is from this that the term “quack” developed.<br />
Apothecaries were originally wholesale merchants <strong>and</strong> spice importers, <strong>and</strong> in 1617 the<br />
Worshipful Society <strong>of</strong> Apothecaries was formed, under the control <strong>of</strong> the London Royal College <strong>of</strong><br />
Physicians, which produced an “<strong>of</strong>ficial” pharmacopoeia specifying the drugs the apothecaries<br />
were allowed to dispense. The term “perfumer” occurs in some places instead <strong>of</strong> “apothecary”<br />
(Rimmel, 1865).<br />
John Gerard (1545–1612) <strong>and</strong> Nicholas Culpeper (1616–1654) were two <strong>of</strong> the better-known<br />
apothecaries <strong>of</strong> their time. Nicholas Culpeper combined healing herbs with astrology as he believed<br />
that each plant, like each part <strong>of</strong> the body, <strong>and</strong> each disease, was governed or under the influence <strong>of</strong><br />
one <strong>of</strong> the planets: rosemary was believed to be ruled by the Sun, lavender by Mercury, <strong>and</strong> spearmint<br />
by Venus. Culpeper also adhered to the Doctrine <strong>of</strong> Signatures, introduced by Paracelsus in the<br />
sixteenth century, <strong>and</strong> mythology played a role in many <strong>of</strong> the descriptive virtues in Culpeper’s<br />
herbal. This astrological tradition is carried through by many aromatherapists today, together with<br />
other innovations such as ying <strong>and</strong> yang, crystals, <strong>and</strong> colors.<br />
Culpeper’s simple or distilled waters <strong>and</strong> oils (equivalent to the present hydrosols) were prepared<br />
by the distillation <strong>of</strong> herbs in water in a pewter still, <strong>and</strong> then fractionating them to separate out the<br />
essential or “chymical” oil from the scented plants. The plant waters were the weakest <strong>of</strong> the herbal<br />
preparations <strong>and</strong> were not regarded as being beneficial. Individual plants such as rose or elderflower<br />
were used to make the corresponding waters, or else mixtures <strong>of</strong> herbs were used to make compound<br />
waters (Culpeper, 1826/1981; Tobyn, 1997). <strong>Essential</strong> oils <strong>of</strong> single herbs were regarded by<br />
Culpeper as too strong to be taken alone, due to their vehement heat <strong>and</strong> burning, but had to be<br />
mixed with other medicinal preparations. Two or three drops were used in this way at a time.<br />
Culpeper mentioned the oils <strong>of</strong> wormwood, hyssop, marjoram, the mints, oregano, pennyroyal,<br />
rosemary, rue, sage, thyme, chamomile, lavender, orange, <strong>and</strong> lemon. Spike lavender, not Lav<strong>and</strong>ula<br />
angustifolia, is used in aromatherapy nowadays. Herbs such as dried wormwood <strong>and</strong> rosemary were<br />
also steeped in wine <strong>and</strong> set in the sun for 30–40 days to make a “physical wine.” The “herbal<br />
extracts” mentioned in the herbals were mostly water soluble <strong>and</strong> at best, alcoholic extracts, none <strong>of</strong><br />
which are equivalent to essential oils, which contain many potent chemical components are not<br />
found in essential oils.
Aromatherapy with <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 557<br />
13.7 MODERN PERFUMERY<br />
In the fourteenth century, alcohol was used for the extraction <strong>and</strong> preservation <strong>of</strong> plants, <strong>and</strong> oleum<br />
mirable, an alcoholic extract <strong>of</strong> rosemary <strong>and</strong> resins, was later popularized as “Hungary water,”<br />
without the resins (Müller et al., 1984).<br />
In the sixteenth century, perfumes were made using animal extracts, which were the base notes<br />
or fixatives, <strong>and</strong> made the scent last longer (Piesse, 1855). Among these ingredients were ambergris,<br />
musk, <strong>and</strong> civet.<br />
Perfumes came into general use in Engl<strong>and</strong> during the reign <strong>of</strong> Queen Elizabeth (1558–1603).<br />
Many perfumes, such as rose water, benzoin, <strong>and</strong> storax, were used for sweetening the heavy ornate<br />
robes <strong>of</strong> the time, which were impossible to wash. Urinals were treated with orris powder, damask<br />
rose powder, <strong>and</strong> rose water. Bags <strong>of</strong> herbs, musk, <strong>and</strong> civet were used to perfume bath water.<br />
Elizabeth I carried a pom<strong>and</strong>er filled with ambergris, benzoin, civet, damask rose, <strong>and</strong> other<br />
perfumes (Rimmel, 1865) <strong>and</strong> used a multitude <strong>of</strong> perfumed products in later life. Pom<strong>and</strong>ers, from<br />
the French pomme d’amber (“ball <strong>of</strong> ambergris”), were originally hung in silver perforated balls<br />
from the ceiling to perfume the room. The ingredients such as benzoin, amber, labdanum, storax,<br />
musk, civet, <strong>and</strong> rose buds could be boiled with gum tragacanth <strong>and</strong> kneaded into balls; the small<br />
ones were made into necklaces.<br />
Various recipes were used for preparing aromatic waters, oils, <strong>and</strong> perfumes. Some <strong>of</strong> these were<br />
for perfumes <strong>and</strong> some undoubtedly for alcoholic beverages, as one <strong>of</strong> the major ingredients for many<br />
concoctions was a bottle or two <strong>of</strong> wine, which when distilled produced a very alcoholic brew.<br />
Ambergris, musk, <strong>and</strong> civet went out <strong>of</strong> fashion, as the excremental odors could not be reconciled<br />
with modesty (Corbin, 1986). The delicate floral perfumes became part <strong>of</strong> the ritual <strong>of</strong> bodily<br />
hygiene, gave greater variety, <strong>and</strong> allowed Louis XV a different perfume every day. Today the sentiment<br />
“odours are carried in bottles, for fear <strong>of</strong> annoying those who do not like them” (Dejeans,<br />
1764) is reemerging as more <strong>and</strong> more people are becoming sensitive to odors, giving them headaches,<br />
asthma, <strong>and</strong> migraines.<br />
The Victorians liked simple perfumes made <strong>of</strong> individual plant extracts. Particular favorites<br />
were rose, lavender, <strong>and</strong> violet. These would be steam distilled or extracted with solvents. The<br />
simple essential oils produced would <strong>of</strong>ten be blended together to produce perfumes like eau de<br />
Cologne (1834).<br />
The first commercial scent production was produced in the United Kingdom, in Mitcham, Surrey,<br />
in the seventeenth century, using lavender (Festing, 1989). In 1865, cinnamaldehyde, the first<br />
synthetic, was made. Adulteration <strong>and</strong> substitution by the essential oil or component <strong>of</strong> another<br />
plant species became rampant. Aroma chemicals synthesized from coal, petroleum by-products,<br />
<strong>and</strong> terpenes are much cheaper than the equivalent plant products, so perfumes became cheap.<br />
The way was now open for the use <strong>of</strong> scent in the modern era. It seems therefore a retrograde step<br />
to use pure essential oils in “aromatherapy,” especially as the “father <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy,” René-<br />
Maurice Gattefossé, used scents or deterpenated essential oils.<br />
13.8 AROMATHERAPY PRACTICE<br />
Aromatherapists usually treat their clients (patients) after an initial full consultation, which usually<br />
involves taking down a full medical case history. The aromatherapist then decides what treatment<br />
to give, which usually involves massage with three essential oils, <strong>of</strong>ten one each chosen from those<br />
with top, middle, <strong>and</strong> base perfumery notes, which balances the mixture. Sometimes only “specific”<br />
essential oils for the “disease” are used. Most aromatherapists arrange to see the client 3–5 times<br />
<strong>and</strong> the mixture will <strong>of</strong>ten be changed on the next visit, if not on each visit, in order to treat all<br />
the possible symptoms presented by the client (holistically), or simply as a substitute when no<br />
improvement was initially obtained. Treatment may involve other alternative medicine procedures,<br />
including chakras.
558 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Many aromatherapists <strong>of</strong>fer to treat any illness, as they are convinced that essential oils have<br />
great powers. They embark on the treatment <strong>of</strong> endometriosis, infertility, asthma, diabetes, <strong>and</strong><br />
arthritis, even cancer, as they are convinced <strong>of</strong> the therapeutic nature <strong>of</strong> essential oils, but are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
without the necessary scientific <strong>and</strong> medical knowledge. “Psychoneuroimmunology” treatment is<br />
the current buzzword.<br />
Although aromatherapists consider themselves pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, there is no Hippocratic oath<br />
involved. The aromatherapist, being nonmedically qualified, may not even be acquainted with most<br />
<strong>of</strong> the illnesses or symptoms, so there could be a very serious mistake made as potentially serious<br />
illnesses could be adversely affected by being “treated” by a layperson. Some, but not all, aromatherapists<br />
ask the patients to tell their doctor <strong>of</strong> the aromatherapy treatment. Counseling is greatly<br />
recommended by aromatherapy schools. Aromatherapists are not necessarily, however, trained in<br />
counseling, <strong>and</strong> with few exceptions could do more damage than good, especially when dealing<br />
with psychiatric illness, cases <strong>of</strong> physical or drug abuse, people with learning difficulties, <strong>and</strong> so on,<br />
where their “treatment” should only be complementary <strong>and</strong> under a doctor’s control (Lis-Balchin,<br />
2006).<br />
13.8.1 METHODS OF APPLICATION OF AROMATHERAPY TREATMENT<br />
Various methods are used to apply the treatment in aromatherapy. The most usual methods are the<br />
following:<br />
• A diffuser, usually powered by electricity, giving out a fine mist <strong>of</strong> the essential oil.<br />
• A burner, with water added to the fragrance to prevent burning <strong>of</strong> the essential oil. About<br />
1–4 drops <strong>of</strong> essential oil are added to about 10 mL water. The burner can be warmed by<br />
c<strong>and</strong>les or electricity. The latter would be safer in a hospital or a children’s room or even a<br />
bedroom.<br />
• Ceramic or metal rings, placed on an electric light bulb with a drop or two <strong>of</strong> essential oil.<br />
This results in a rapid burnout <strong>of</strong> the oil <strong>and</strong> lasts for a very short time due to the rapid volatilization<br />
<strong>of</strong> the essential oil in the heat.<br />
• A warm bath with drops <strong>of</strong> essential oil added. This results in the slow volatilization <strong>of</strong> the<br />
essential oil, <strong>and</strong> the odor is inhaled via the mouth <strong>and</strong> nose. Any effect is not likely to be<br />
through the absorption <strong>of</strong> the essential oil through the skin as stated in aromatherapy<br />
books, as the essential oil does not mix with water. Droplets either form on the surface <strong>of</strong><br />
the water, <strong>of</strong>ten coalescing, or else the essential oil sticks to the side <strong>of</strong> the bath. Pouring in<br />
an essential oil mixed with milk serves no useful purpose as the essential oil still does not<br />
mix with water, <strong>and</strong> the premixing <strong>of</strong> the essential oil in a carrier oil, as for massage, just<br />
results in a nasty oily scum around the bath.<br />
• A bowl <strong>of</strong> hot water with drops <strong>of</strong> essential oil, <strong>of</strong>ten used for soaking feet or used as a<br />
bidet. Again the essential oil does not mix with the water. This is, however, a useful method<br />
for inhaling essential oils in respiratory conditions <strong>and</strong> colds; the essential oil can be<br />
breathed in when the head is placed over the container <strong>and</strong> a towel placed over the head <strong>and</strong><br />
container. This is an established method <strong>of</strong> treatment <strong>and</strong> has been used successfully with<br />
Vicks VapoRub, obas oil, <strong>and</strong> Eucalyptus oils for many years, so it is not surprising that it<br />
works with aromatherapy essential oils!<br />
• Compresses using essential oil drops on a wet cloth, either hot or cold, to relieve<br />
inflammation, treat wounds, <strong>and</strong> so on. Again, the essential oil is not able to mix with the<br />
water <strong>and</strong> can be concentrated in one or two areas, making it a possible health hazard.<br />
• Massage <strong>of</strong> h<strong>and</strong>s, feet, back, or all over the body using 2–4 drops <strong>of</strong> essential oil (single<br />
essential oil or mixture) diluted in 10 mL carrier oil (fixed, oily), for example, almond oil<br />
or jojoba oil, grapeseed, wheat-germ oils, <strong>and</strong> so on. The massage applied is usually by<br />
gentle effleurage with some petrissage (kneading), with <strong>and</strong> without some shiatsu, lymph
Aromatherapy with <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 559<br />
drainage in some cases, <strong>and</strong> is more or less vigorous, according to the aromatherapist’s<br />
skills <strong>and</strong> beliefs.<br />
• Oral intake is more like conventional than “alternative” usage <strong>of</strong> essential oils. Although it<br />
is practiced by a number <strong>of</strong> aromatherapists, this is not to be condoned unless the aromatherapist<br />
is medically qualified. <strong>Essential</strong> oil drops are “mixed” in a tumbler <strong>of</strong> hot water<br />
or presented on a sugar cube or “mixed” with a teaspoonful <strong>of</strong> honey <strong>and</strong> taken internally.<br />
The inability <strong>of</strong> the essential oil to mix with aqueous solutions presents a health hazard, as<br />
do the other methods, as such strong concentrations <strong>of</strong> essential oils are involved.<br />
13.9 MASSAGE USING ESSENTIAL OILS<br />
The most popular method <strong>of</strong> using aromatherapy is through massage. The first written records referring<br />
to massage date back to its practice in China more than 4000 years <strong>and</strong> in Egypt. Hippocrates,<br />
the father <strong>of</strong> modern medicine, wrote, “the physician must be experienced in many things, but most<br />
assuredly in rubbing.”<br />
Massage has been used for centuries in Ayurvedic medicine in India as well as in China <strong>and</strong><br />
shiatsu, acupressure, reflexology, <strong>and</strong> many other contemporary techniques have their roots in these<br />
sources. Massage was used for conventional therapeutic purposes in hospitals before World War II<br />
<strong>and</strong> is still used by physiotherapists for various conditions including sports injuries.<br />
René-Maurice Gattefossé, credited as being the founding father <strong>of</strong> modern aromatherapy, never<br />
made a connection between essential oils <strong>and</strong> massage. It was Marguerite Maury who advocated the<br />
external use <strong>of</strong> essential oils combined with carrier oils (Maury, 1989). She used carefully selected<br />
essential oils for cleansing the skin, including that in acne, using a unique blend <strong>of</strong> oils for each client<br />
created specifically for the person’s temperament <strong>and</strong> health situation. Maury’s main focus was<br />
on rejuvenation; she was convinced that aromas could be used to slow down the aging process if the<br />
correct oils were chosen. In recent experiments on animals, it has been shown that the oral intake <strong>of</strong><br />
some antioxidant essential oils can appear to defer aging, as indicated by the composition <strong>of</strong> membranes<br />
in various tissues (Youdim <strong>and</strong> Deans, 2000).<br />
Massage per se can be a relaxing experience <strong>and</strong> can help to alleviate the stresses <strong>and</strong> strains <strong>of</strong><br />
daily life. In a review <strong>of</strong> the literature on massage, Vickers (1996) found that in most studies massage<br />
had no psychological effect, in a few studies there was arousal, <strong>and</strong> in an even smaller number<br />
<strong>of</strong> studies there was sedation; some massage has both local <strong>and</strong> systemic effects on blood flow <strong>and</strong><br />
possibly on lymph flow <strong>and</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong> muscle tension.<br />
It may be that these variable responses are directly related to the variability <strong>of</strong> massage techniques,<br />
<strong>of</strong> which there are over 200. Massage can be given over the whole body or limited to the<br />
face, neck, or just h<strong>and</strong>s, feet, legs—depending on the patient <strong>and</strong> his or her condition or illness, for<br />
example, patients with learning disabilities <strong>and</strong> many psychiatric patients are <strong>of</strong>ten only able to have<br />
limited body contact for a short time.<br />
13.9.1 MASSAGE TECHNIQUES<br />
Massage is customarily defined as the manual manipulation <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>of</strong>t tissues <strong>of</strong> the body for therapeutic<br />
purposes, using strokes that include gliding, kneading, pressing, tapping, <strong>and</strong>/or vibrating<br />
(Tisser<strong>and</strong>, 1977; Price <strong>and</strong> Price, 1999). Massage therapists may also cause movement within the<br />
joints, apply heat or cold, use holding techniques, <strong>and</strong>/or advise clients on exercises to improve<br />
muscle tone <strong>and</strong> range <strong>of</strong> motion. Some common massage techniques include Swedish massage,<br />
acupressure, craniosacral therapy, deep tissue massage, infant massage, lymph system massage,<br />
polarity therapy, reflexology, reiki, rolfing, shiatsu, <strong>and</strong> therapeutic touch.<br />
Massage usually involves the use <strong>of</strong> a lubricating oil to help the practitioner’s h<strong>and</strong>s glide more<br />
evenly over the body. The addition <strong>of</strong> perfumed essential oils further adds to its potential to relax.
560 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
In most English-speaking countries, massage is nowadays seen as an alternative or complementary<br />
treatment. However, before World War II, it was regarded as a conventional treatment (Goldstone,<br />
1999, 2000), as it is now in continental Europe. In Austria, for example, most patients with back pain<br />
receive (<strong>and</strong> are usually reimbursed for) massage treatment (Ernst, 2003a).<br />
Not all massage treatments are free <strong>of</strong> risk. Too much force can cause fractures <strong>of</strong> osteoporotic<br />
bones, <strong>and</strong> even rupture <strong>of</strong> the liver <strong>and</strong> damage to nerves have been associated with massage<br />
(Ernst, 2003b). These events are rarities, however, <strong>and</strong> massage is relatively safe, provided that welltrained<br />
therapists observe the contraindications: phlebitis, deep vein thrombosis, burns, skin infections,<br />
eczema, open wounds, bone fractures, <strong>and</strong> advanced osteoporosis (Ernst et al., 2001).<br />
It is not known exactly how massage works, although many theories abound (Vickers, 1996;<br />
Ernst et al., 2001). The mechanical action <strong>of</strong> the h<strong>and</strong>s on cutaneous <strong>and</strong> subcutaneous structures<br />
enhances circulation <strong>of</strong> blood <strong>and</strong> lymph, resulting in increased supply <strong>of</strong> oxygen <strong>and</strong> removal <strong>of</strong><br />
waste products or mediators <strong>of</strong> pain (Goats, 1994). Certain massage techniques have been shown to<br />
increase the threshold for pain (Dhondt et al., 1999). Also, most importantly from the st<strong>and</strong>point <strong>of</strong><br />
aromatherapy, a massage can relax the mind <strong>and</strong> reduce anxiety, which could positively affect the<br />
perception <strong>of</strong> pain (Vickers, 1996; Ernst, 2003a). Many studies have been carried out, most <strong>of</strong> which<br />
are unsatisfactory. It appears that placebo-controlled, double-blind trials may not be possible, yet<br />
few r<strong>and</strong>omized clinical trials have been forthcoming.<br />
Different client groups require proper recognition before aromatherapy trials are started or aromatherapy<br />
massage is given. For example, for cancer patients, guidelines must be observed<br />
(Wilkinson et al., 1999): special care must be taken for certain conditions such as autoimmune disease<br />
(where there are tiny bruises present); low blood cell count, which makes the patient lethargic<br />
<strong>and</strong> needing nothing more than very gentle treatment; <strong>and</strong> lymphoedema, which should not be<br />
treated unless the therapist has special knowledge <strong>and</strong> where enfleurage toward the lymph nodes<br />
should not be used.<br />
Recent individual studies to investigate the benefit <strong>of</strong> massage for certain complaints have<br />
given variable results. Many are positive, although the st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>of</strong> the studies has, in general,<br />
been poor (Vickers, 1996). The most successful applications <strong>of</strong> massage or aromatherapy massage<br />
have been in cancer care, <strong>and</strong> about a third <strong>of</strong> patients with cancer use complementary/<br />
alternative medicine during their illness (Ernst <strong>and</strong> Cassileth, 1998). Massage is commonly provided<br />
within UK cancer services (Kohn, 1999), <strong>and</strong> although only anecdotal <strong>and</strong> qualitative evidence<br />
is available, it is considered by patients to be beneficial. Only a few small-scale studies<br />
among patients with cancer have identified short-term benefits from a course <strong>of</strong> massage, mainly<br />
in terms <strong>of</strong> reduced anxiety (Corner et al., 1995; Kite et al., 1998; Wilkinson et al., 1999). These<br />
studies have been criticized by scientists; however, as they were either nonr<strong>and</strong>omized, had inadequate<br />
control groups or were observational in design (Cooke <strong>and</strong> Ernst, 2000). Complementary<br />
therapy practitioners have criticized medical research for not being sufficiently holistic in<br />
approach, focusing on efficacy <strong>of</strong> treatments in terms <strong>of</strong> tumor response <strong>and</strong> survival, rather than<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> life (Wilkinson, 2003).<br />
A general study <strong>of</strong> the clinical effectiveness <strong>of</strong> massage by Ernst (1994) used numerous trials,<br />
with <strong>and</strong> without control groups. A variety <strong>of</strong> control interventions were used in the controlled studies<br />
including placebo, analgesics, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), <strong>and</strong> so on.<br />
There were some positive effects <strong>of</strong> vibrational or manual massage, assessed as improvements in<br />
mobility, Doppler flow, expiratory volume, <strong>and</strong> reduced lymphoedema in controlled studies.<br />
Improvements in musculoskeletal <strong>and</strong> phantom limb pain, but not cancer pain, were recorded in<br />
controlled studies. Uncontrolled studies were invariably positive. Adverse effects included thrombophlebitis<br />
<strong>and</strong> local inflammation or ulceration <strong>of</strong> the skin.<br />
Different megastudies included massage for delayed-onset muscle soreness—seven trials were<br />
included with 132 patients in total (Ernst, 1998); effleurage backrub for relaxation—nine trials were<br />
included with a total <strong>of</strong> 250 patients (Labyak <strong>and</strong> Metzger, 1997), <strong>and</strong> massage for low back pain<br />
(Ernst, 1999a, 1999b). All gave positive <strong>and</strong> negative outcomes.
Aromatherapy with <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 561<br />
13.10 AROMATHERAPY: BLENDING OF ESSENTIAL OILS<br />
There are numerous suggestions for the use <strong>of</strong> particular essential oils for treating specific illnesses<br />
in books on aromatherapy. However, when collated, each essential oil can treat each illness (Vickers,<br />
1996; compare also individual essential oil monographs in Lis-Balchin, 2006).<br />
A few drops <strong>of</strong> the essential oil or oils chosen are always mixed with a carrier oil before being<br />
applied to the skin for an aromatherapy massage. The exact dilution <strong>of</strong> the essential oils in the<br />
carrier oil is <strong>of</strong>ten controversial <strong>and</strong> can be anything from 0.5% to 20% <strong>and</strong> more. Either 5, 10, or<br />
20 mL <strong>of</strong> carrier oil is first poured into a (usually brown) bottle with a stoppered dropper. The essential<br />
oil is then added dropwise into the carrier oil, either as a single essential oil or as a mixture <strong>of</strong><br />
2–3 different essential oils, <strong>and</strong> then stoppered.<br />
Volumes <strong>of</strong> essential oils used for dilutions vary widely in different aromatherapies <strong>and</strong> the fact<br />
that even the size <strong>of</strong> a “dropper” varies raised the question <strong>of</strong> possible safety problems (Lis-Balchin,<br />
2006), <strong>and</strong> a recent article in a nursing journal makes a request for st<strong>and</strong>ardization <strong>of</strong> the measurement<br />
<strong>of</strong> the dropper size (Ollevant et al., 1999).<br />
13.10.1 FIXED OILS<br />
Many fixed oils are used for dilution <strong>and</strong> all provide a lubricant; many have a high vitamin E <strong>and</strong> A<br />
content. By moistening the skin, they can assist in a variety <strong>of</strong> mild skin conditions especially where<br />
the skin is rough, cracked, or dry (Healey <strong>and</strong> Aslam, 1996).<br />
Almond (Prunus amygdalus var. dulcis)—sweet, cheapest, <strong>and</strong> most commonly used. Others<br />
include apricot kernel (Prunus armeniaca), borage seed (Borago <strong>of</strong>ficinalis), calendula (Calendula<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficinalis), coconut oil (Cocos nucifera), evening primrose (Oenothera biennis), grapeseed (Vitis<br />
vinifera), macadamia nut (Macadamia integrifolia), olive (Olea europaea), rose hip seed (Rosa<br />
mosqueta, etc.), soya bean (Glycine soya), sunflower (Helianthus annuus), wheatgerm (Triticum<br />
vulgare), <strong>and</strong> jojoba (Simmondsia californica). The latest oil in vogue is emu oil (Dromiceius<br />
novaehol-l<strong>and</strong>iae), which comes from a thick pad <strong>of</strong> fat on the bird’s back. For centuries, the aborigines<br />
<strong>of</strong> Australia have been applying emu oil to their wounds with excellent results. It is now found<br />
in muscle pain relievers, skin care products, <strong>and</strong> natural soaps.<br />
The exact method <strong>of</strong> mixing is controversial, but most aromatherapists are taught not to shake<br />
the bottle containing the essential oil(s) <strong>and</strong> the diluent fixed oils, but to gently mix the contents by<br />
turning the bottle in the h<strong>and</strong>. Differences in the actual odor <strong>and</strong> thereby presumable benefits <strong>of</strong><br />
the diluted oils made by different aromatherapists can just be due to the different droppers (Lis-<br />
Balchin, 2006).<br />
13.11 INTERNAL USAGE OF ESSENTIAL OILS BY AROMATHERAPISTS<br />
Oral intake <strong>of</strong> essential oils is not true “aromatherapy” as the odor has virtually no effect past the<br />
mouth <strong>and</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> the chemical components takes over as odors cannot influence the internal<br />
organs (Lis-Balchin, 1998a). Therapy with essential oils is dealt with in another chapter. Most aromatherapists<br />
consider that essential oils should only be prescribed by primary care practitioners<br />
such as medical doctors or medical herbalists who have intimate knowledge <strong>of</strong> essential oil toxicology<br />
(Tisser<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Balacs, 1995). In the United Kingdom, such “clinical aromatherapy” is rare,<br />
unlike on the continent. Maladies treated include arthritis, bronchitis, rheumatism, chilblains,<br />
eczema, high blood pressure, <strong>and</strong> venereal diseases. In clinical aromatherapy, there is a real risk <strong>of</strong><br />
overdosage due to variable droppers on bottles, which can differ by as much as 200% (Lis-Balchin,<br />
2006); this may be the cause <strong>of</strong> asphyxiation <strong>of</strong> a baby, as already shown by peppermint oil (Bunyan,<br />
1998). It is possible that aromatherapists would not be covered by their insurance if there were<br />
adverse effects. However, most <strong>of</strong> us ingest small amounts <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> their components<br />
daily in almost all processed foods <strong>and</strong> drinks, but it does not make us all healthy.
562 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Conventional drugs involving essential oils <strong>and</strong> their components have been used internally for a<br />
long time, for example, decongestants containing menthol, camphor <strong>and</strong> pine, <strong>and</strong> various throat drops<br />
containing components from essential oils such as lemon, thyme, peppermint, sage, <strong>and</strong> hyssop.<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils in processed foods are used in very minute amounts <strong>of</strong> 10 ppm, but can be 1000 ppm<br />
in mint confectionery or chewing gum (Fenaroli, 1997). This contrasts greatly with the use <strong>of</strong> drops<br />
<strong>of</strong> undiluted essential oils on sugar lumps for oral application, or on suppositories in anal or vaginal<br />
application. Damage to mucous membranes could result due to the high concentration <strong>of</strong> the essential<br />
oils in certain areas <strong>of</strong> the applicator.<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils <strong>and</strong> their components are incorporated into enterically coated capsules to prevent<br />
damage <strong>and</strong> used for treating irritable bowel syndrome (peppermint in Colpermin), a mixture <strong>of</strong><br />
monoterpenes for treating gallstones (Rowatol) <strong>and</strong> ureteric stones (Rowatinex); these are under<br />
product licenses as medicines (Somerville et al., 1984, 1985; Engelstein et al., 1992).<br />
Some aromatherapists support the use <strong>of</strong> essential oils in various venereal conditions. However,<br />
aromatherapists are either qualified to treat venereal disease conditions, nor can make an accurate<br />
diagnosis in the first place, unless they are also medically qualified. Tea tree oil (2–3 drops undiluted)<br />
was used on a tampon for c<strong>and</strong>idiasis with apparently very encouraging results (Zarno, 1994).<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida treatments also include chamomile, lavender, bergamot, <strong>and</strong> thyme (Schnaubelt, 1999).<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils used in this way, sometimes for months, <strong>of</strong>ten produced extremely painful reactions<br />
<strong>and</strong> putrid discharges due to damage to delicate mucosal membranes.<br />
13.12 USE OF PURE OR SYNTHETIC COMPONENTS<br />
Does it really matter whether the essential oil is pure or a synthetic mixture as long as the odor is<br />
the same? The perfumers certainly do not see any difference, <strong>and</strong> even prefer the synthetics as they<br />
remain constant. Many <strong>of</strong> the so-called pure essential oils used today are, however, adulterated<br />
(Which Report, 2001; Lis-Balchin et al., 1996, 1998). There is <strong>of</strong>ten a difference in the proportion<br />
<strong>of</strong> different enantiomers <strong>of</strong> individual components that <strong>of</strong>ten have different odors <strong>and</strong> different biological<br />
properties (Lis-Balchin, 2002a, 2002b). This was not, however, appreciated by Gattefosse<br />
(1937/1993), who worked with perfumes <strong>and</strong> not with the “pure plant essential oils” (Formulaires<br />
de Parfumerie Gattefossé, 1906). He studied the antimicrobial <strong>and</strong> wound-healing properties <strong>of</strong><br />
essential oils on soldiers during World War I (Arnould-Taylor, 1981). He later worked in hospitals on<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> perfumes <strong>and</strong> essential oils as antiseptics <strong>and</strong> other (unstated) applications, <strong>and</strong> also in<br />
dermatology, which led to advances in the development <strong>of</strong> beauty products <strong>and</strong> treatments <strong>and</strong> the<br />
publication <strong>of</strong> Physiological Aesthetics <strong>and</strong> Beauty Products in 1936 (Gattefosse, 1992).<br />
Gattefossé promoted the deterpenization <strong>of</strong> essential oils because, being a perfumer, he was<br />
aware that his products must be stable, have a long shelf-life, <strong>and</strong> not go cloudy when diluted in<br />
alcohol. Terpenes also oxidize rapidly, <strong>of</strong>ten giving rise to toxic oxidation products (e.g., limonene<br />
<strong>of</strong> citrus essential oils). But this goes against the use <strong>of</strong> pure essential oils, as their wholeness or<br />
natural synergy is apparently destroyed (Price, 1993). Bergamot <strong>and</strong> other citrus essential oils<br />
obtained by expression are therefore recommended, despite their phototoxicity (Price <strong>and</strong> Price,<br />
1999). There is no reason why a toxic essential oil should be preferentially used if the nontoxic<br />
furanocoumarin-free (FCF) alternative is available. If adverse effects resulted, it is possible that<br />
there could be legal implications for the therapist.<br />
13.13 THERAPEUTIC CLAIMS FOR THE APPLICATION OF ESSENTIAL OILS<br />
There are a wide range <strong>of</strong> properties ascribed to each essential oil in aromatherapy books, without<br />
any scientific pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> effectiveness (Vickers, 1996; Lis-Balchin, 2006). The following are a few<br />
examples.<br />
Diabetes can be treated by eucalyptus, geranium, <strong>and</strong> juniper (Tisser<strong>and</strong>, 1977); clary sage,<br />
eucalyptus, geranium, juniper, lemon, pine, red thyme, sweet thyme, vetiver, <strong>and</strong> ylang ylang (Price,
Aromatherapy with <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 563<br />
1993); eucalyptus, geranium, juniper, <strong>and</strong> onion (Valnet, 1982); <strong>and</strong> eucalyptus, geranium, cypress,<br />
lavender, hyssop, <strong>and</strong> ginger (Worwood, 1991).<br />
Allergies can be treated by immortelle, chamomile, balm, <strong>and</strong> rose (Fischer-Rizzi, 1990); lemon<br />
balm, chamomile (German <strong>and</strong> Roman), helichrysum, true lavender, <strong>and</strong> spikenard (Lawless, 1992);<br />
<strong>and</strong> chamomile, jasmine, neroli, <strong>and</strong> rose (Price, 1983).<br />
No botanical names are, however, given in the lists, even when there are several possible species.<br />
No indication is provided as to why these particular essential oils are used <strong>and</strong> how they are supposed<br />
to affect the condition. Taking the case <strong>of</strong> diabetes, where there is a lack <strong>of</strong> the hormone<br />
insulin, it is impossible to say how massage with any given essential oil could cure the condition,<br />
without giving the hormone itself in juvenile-type diabetes or some blood glucose-decreasing<br />
drugs in late-onset diabetes. Unfortunately, constant repetition <strong>of</strong> a given statement <strong>of</strong>ten lends it<br />
credence—at least to the layperson, who does not require scientific evidence <strong>of</strong> its validity.<br />
13.13.1 FALSE CLAIMS CHALLENGED IN COURT<br />
The false promotion <strong>of</strong> products for treating not only medical conditions but also well-being generally<br />
is now being challenged in the law courts. For example, in 1997, Los Angeles attorney Morsé<br />
Mehrban charged that Lafabre <strong>and</strong> Aroma Vera had violated the California Business <strong>and</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essions<br />
Code by advertising that their products could promote health <strong>and</strong> well-being, relax the body, relax<br />
the mind, enhance mood, purify the air, are antidotes to air pollution, relieve fatigue, tone the body,<br />
nourish the skin, promote circulation, alleviate feminine cramps, <strong>and</strong> do about 50 other things<br />
(Barrett, 2000). In September 2000, the case was settled out <strong>of</strong> court with a $5700 payment to<br />
Mehrban <strong>and</strong> a court-approved stipulation prohibiting the defendants from making 57 <strong>of</strong> the disputed<br />
claims in advertising within California (Horowitz, 2000).<br />
13.14 PHYSIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL RESPONSES TO ESSENTIAL<br />
OILS AND PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY<br />
Many examples <strong>of</strong> essential oil effects abound in animal studies, for example, the sedative action <strong>of</strong><br />
lavender on the overall activity <strong>of</strong> mice decreased when exposed to lavender vapor (Lav<strong>and</strong>ula<br />
angustifolia P. Miller); its components linalool <strong>and</strong> linalyl acetate showed a similar effect (Buchbauer<br />
et al., 1992). A possible explanation for the observed sedative effects was shown by Linalool, which<br />
produced a dose-dependent inhibition <strong>of</strong> the binding <strong>of</strong> glutamate (an excitatory neurotransmitter in<br />
the brain) to its receptors on membranes <strong>of</strong> the rat cerebral cortex (Elisabetsky et al., 1995). More<br />
recently, this action was related to an anticonvulsant activity <strong>of</strong> linalool in rats (Elisabetsky et al.,<br />
1999). Other oils with sedative activity were found to be neroli <strong>and</strong> s<strong>and</strong>alwood; active components<br />
included citronellal, phenylethyl acetate, linalool, linalyl acetate, benzaldehyde, -terpineol, <strong>and</strong><br />
isoeugenol (in order <strong>of</strong> decreasing activity).<br />
Stimulant oils included jasmine, patchouli, ylang ylang, basil, <strong>and</strong> rosemary; active components<br />
included fenchone, 1,8-cineole, isoborneol, <strong>and</strong> orange terpenes (Lis-Balchin, 2006). There was<br />
considerable similarity in the sedative <strong>and</strong> stimulant effects <strong>of</strong> some essential oils studied physiologically<br />
(e.g., their effect on smooth muscle <strong>of</strong> the guinea pig in vitro) <strong>and</strong> in various psychological<br />
assessments, mostly on humans (Lis-Balchin, 2006).<br />
1,8-Cineole when inhaled, showed a decreased blood flow through the brain (measured using<br />
computerized tomography) although no changes were found with lavender oil or linalyl acetate<br />
(Buchbauer et al., 1993c). Changing electrical activity, picked up by scalp electrodes, in response to<br />
lavender odors was considered a measure <strong>of</strong> brain activity (EEG) (Van Toller et al., 1993). The most<br />
consistent responses to odors were in the theta b<strong>and</strong> (Klemm et al., 1992). Many essential oil vapors<br />
have been shown to depress CNV brain waves (an upward shift in EEG waves that occurs when<br />
people are expecting something to happen) in human volunteers <strong>and</strong> these are considered to be<br />
sedatives; others increase CNV <strong>and</strong> are considered stimulants: lavender was found to have a sedative
564 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
effect on humans (Torii et al., 1988; Kubota et al., 1992; Manley, 1993) <strong>and</strong> had a “positive” effect<br />
on mood, EEG patterns, <strong>and</strong> maths computations (Diego et al., 1998). It also caused reduced motility<br />
in mice (Kovar et al., 1987; Ammon, 1989; Buchbauer et al., 1992, 1993a, 1993b, 1993c; Jaeger<br />
et al., 1992). However, Karamat et al. (1992) found that lavender had a stimulant effect on decision<br />
times in human experiments.<br />
A large workplace in Japan with odorized air via the whole building showed that citrus smells<br />
refreshed the workers first thing in the morning <strong>and</strong> after the lunch break, <strong>and</strong> floral smells improved<br />
their concentration in between. In the lunch break <strong>and</strong> during late afternoon, woodl<strong>and</strong> scents were<br />
circulated to relax the workers <strong>and</strong> this increased productivity (Van Toller <strong>and</strong> Dodd, 1991). It is<br />
also possible that the use <strong>of</strong> a general regime <strong>of</strong> odorants could have very negative effects on some<br />
members <strong>of</strong> the workforce or on patients in hospital wards, where the use <strong>of</strong> pleasant odors could<br />
mask the usual unpleasant odors providing the smell <strong>of</strong> fear. Ambient odors have an effect on creativity,<br />
mood, <strong>and</strong> perceived health (Knasco, 1992, 1993) <strong>and</strong> so does feigned odor (Knasco et al.,<br />
1990).<br />
It is very difficult to make simple generalizations concerning the effects <strong>of</strong> any fragrance on<br />
psychological responses, which are based on the immediate perceptual effects, rather than the longer<br />
term pharmacological effects because the pharmacological effect is likely to affect people similarly,<br />
but the additional psychological mechanisms will create complex effects at the individual level.<br />
Odors are perceptible even during sleep, as shown in another experiment; college students were<br />
tested with fragrances during the night <strong>and</strong> the day (Badia, 1991).<br />
Various nonscientific studies have been published in perfumery journals on the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
psychiatric patients by psychoaromatherapy in the 1920s (Gatti <strong>and</strong> Cajola, 1923a, 1923b, 1929;<br />
Tisser<strong>and</strong>, 1997) but there was virtually no information on their exact illnesses. Sedative essential<br />
oils or essences were identified as chamomile, melissa, neroli, petitgrain, opoponax, asafoetida, <strong>and</strong><br />
valerian. Stimulants were angelica, cardamom, lemon, fennel, cinnamon, clove, <strong>and</strong> ylang ylang.<br />
Many aromatherapists have also written books on the effect <strong>of</strong> essential oils on the mind, giving<br />
directives for the use <strong>of</strong> specific plant oils for treating various conditions, without any scientific<br />
pro<strong>of</strong> (Lawless, 1994; Worwood, 1996, 1998; Hirsch, 1998).<br />
13.15 PLACEBO EFFECT OF AROMATHERAPY<br />
The placebo effect is an example <strong>of</strong> a real manifestation <strong>of</strong> mind over matter. It does not confine<br />
itself to alternative therapies, but there is a greater likelihood <strong>of</strong> the placebo effect accounting for<br />
over 90% <strong>of</strong> the effect in the latter (Millenson, 1995). Reasons for the potency <strong>of</strong> the placebo effect<br />
are either the patient’s belief in the method; the practitioner’s belief in the method; or the patient <strong>and</strong><br />
practitioner’s belief in each other, that is, the strength <strong>of</strong> their relationship (Weil, 1983).<br />
Placebo effects have been shown to relieve postoperative pain, induce sleep or mental awareness,<br />
bring about drastic remission in both symptoms <strong>and</strong> objective signs <strong>of</strong> chronic diseases, initiate the<br />
rejection <strong>of</strong> warts, <strong>and</strong> other abnormal growths, <strong>and</strong> so on (Weil, 1983). Placebo affects headaches,<br />
seasickness, <strong>and</strong> coughs, as well as have beneficial effects on pathological conditions such as rheumatoid<br />
<strong>and</strong> degenerative arthritis, blood cell count, respiratory rates, vasomotor function, peptic<br />
ulcers, hay fever, <strong>and</strong> hypertension (Cousins, 1979). There can also be undesirable side effects, such<br />
as nausea, headaches, skin rashes, allergic reactions, <strong>and</strong> even addiction, that is, a nocebo effect.<br />
This is almost akin to voodoo death threats or when patients are mistakenly told that their illness is<br />
hopeless—both are said to cause death soon after.<br />
Rats were found to have increased levels <strong>of</strong> opioids in their brains after inhaling certain essential<br />
oils. Opioids are a factor in pain relief (Lis-Balchin, 1998b) <strong>and</strong> can be increased in the body by<br />
autosuggestion, relaxation, belief, <strong>and</strong> so on.<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy for pain relief is best achieved through massage, personal concern <strong>and</strong><br />
touch <strong>of</strong> the patient, <strong>and</strong> also listening to their problems. The extra benefit <strong>of</strong> real “healers” found<br />
among aromatherapists is an added advantage.
Aromatherapy with <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 565<br />
13.16 SAFETY ISSUE IN AROMATHERAPY<br />
Many aromatherapists <strong>and</strong> laymen consider natural essential oils to be completely safe. This is<br />
based on the misconception that all herbs are safe—because they are “natural,” which is a fallacy.<br />
The toxicity <strong>of</strong> essential oils can also be entirely different to that <strong>of</strong> the herb, not only because <strong>of</strong><br />
their high concentration, but also because <strong>of</strong> their ability to pass across membranes very efficiently<br />
due to their lipophilicity.<br />
Some aromatherapists erroneously believe that aromatherapy is self-correcting, unlike conventional<br />
therapy with medicines, <strong>and</strong> if errors are made in aromatherapy, they may be resolved through<br />
discontinuation <strong>of</strong> the wrongful application <strong>of</strong> the oil (e.g., Schnaubelt, 1999).<br />
Many essential oils are inherently toxic at very low concentrations due to very toxic components;<br />
these are not normally used in aromatherapy. Many essential oils that are considered to be nontoxic<br />
can have a toxic effect on some people; this can be influenced by previous sensitization to a given<br />
essential oil, a group <strong>of</strong> essential oils containing similar components, or some adulterant in the essential<br />
oil. It can also be influenced by the age <strong>of</strong> the person; babies <strong>and</strong> young children are especially<br />
vulnerable <strong>and</strong> so are very old people. The influence <strong>of</strong> other medicaments, both conventional <strong>and</strong><br />
herbal, is still in the preliminary stages <strong>of</strong> being studied. It is possible that these medicaments, <strong>and</strong><br />
also probably household products, including perfumes <strong>and</strong> cosmetics, can influence the adverse reactions<br />
to essential oils.<br />
Aromatherapists themselves have also been affected by sensitization (Crawford et al., 2004); in<br />
a 12-month period under study, prevalence <strong>of</strong> h<strong>and</strong> dermatitis in a sample <strong>of</strong> massage therapists was<br />
15% by self-reported criteria <strong>and</strong> 23% by a symptom-based method <strong>and</strong> included the use <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy<br />
products in massage oils, lotions, or creams. In contrast, the suggestion that aromatherapists<br />
have any adverse effects to long-term usage <strong>of</strong> essential oils was apparently disproved by a<br />
nonscientific survey (Price <strong>and</strong> Price, 1999).<br />
As most essential oils were tested over 30 years ago, the toxicity data may now be meaningless,<br />
as different essential oils are now used, some <strong>of</strong> which contain different quantities <strong>of</strong> many different<br />
synthetic components (Lis-Balchin, 2006).<br />
The major drawbacks <strong>of</strong> trying to extrapolate toxicity studies in animals to humans concern<br />
feelings—from headaches to splitting migraines; feeling sick, vertigo, pr<strong>of</strong>ound nausea; tinnitus;<br />
sadness, melancholia, suicidal thoughts; feelings <strong>of</strong> hate—which are clearly impossible to measure<br />
in animals (Lis-Balchin, 2006). The toxicity <strong>of</strong> an individual essential oil/component is also<br />
tested in isolation in animals <strong>and</strong> disregards the possibility <strong>of</strong> modification by other substances,<br />
including food components <strong>and</strong> food additive chemicals, the surrounding atmosphere with gaseous<br />
<strong>and</strong> other components, fragrances used in perfumes, domestic products, in the car, in public transport<br />
(including the people), workplace, <strong>and</strong> so on. These could cause modification <strong>of</strong> the essential<br />
oil/component, its bioavailability, <strong>and</strong> possibly the enhancement or loss <strong>of</strong> its function. The<br />
detoxification processes in the body are all directed to the production <strong>of</strong> a more polar product(s),<br />
which can be excreted mainly by the kidneys regardless <strong>of</strong> whether this/these are more toxic or less<br />
toxic than the initial substance <strong>and</strong> differ in different animals.<br />
Most essential oils have GRAS (generally recognized as safe) status granted by the Flavor <strong>and</strong><br />
Extract Manufacturers Association (FEMA) <strong>and</strong> approved by the US Food <strong>and</strong> Drug Administration<br />
(FDA) for food use, <strong>and</strong> many appear in the food chemical codex. This was reviewed in 1996 after<br />
evaluation by the expert panel <strong>of</strong> the FEMA. The assessment was based on data <strong>of</strong> exposure, <strong>and</strong> as<br />
most flavor ingredients are used at less than 100 ppm, predictions regarding their safety can be assessed<br />
from data on their structurally related group(s) (Munro et al., 1996). The no-observed-adverse-effect<br />
levels (NOELs) are more than 100,000 times their exposure levels from use as flavor ingredients<br />
(Adams et al., 1996). Critical to GRAS assessment are data <strong>of</strong> metabolic fate <strong>and</strong> chronic studies rather<br />
than acute toxicity. Most essential oils <strong>and</strong> components have an LD50 <strong>of</strong> 1–20 g/kg body weight or<br />
roughly 1–20 mL/kg, with a few exceptions as follows: Boldo leaf oil 0.1/0.9 (oral/dermal); Calamus<br />
0.8–9/5; Chenopodium 0.2/0.4; Pennyroyal 0.4/4; <strong>and</strong> Thuja 0.8/4.
566 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Research Institute for Fragrance Materials (RIFM) testing is generally limited to acute oral <strong>and</strong><br />
dermal toxicity, irritation <strong>and</strong> dermal sensitization, <strong>and</strong> phototoxicity <strong>of</strong> individual materials, <strong>and</strong><br />
there is little effort to address synergistic <strong>and</strong> modifying effects <strong>of</strong> materials in combination<br />
(Johansen et al., 1998).<br />
Many materials that were widely used for decades in the past had severe neurotoxic properties<br />
<strong>and</strong> accumulated in body tissues (Spencer et al., 1979; Furuhashi et al., 1994) but most fragrance<br />
materials have never been tested for neurological effects, despite the fact that olfactory pathways<br />
provide a direct route to the brain (Hastings et al., 1991).<br />
13.17 TOXICITY IN HUMANS<br />
The most recent clinical review <strong>of</strong> the adverse reactions to fragrances (de Groot <strong>and</strong> Frosch, 1997)<br />
showed many examples <strong>of</strong> cutaneous reactions to essential oils reported elsewhere (Guin, 1982,<br />
1995). In the United States, about 6 million people have a skin allergy to fragrance <strong>and</strong> this has a<br />
major impact on their quality <strong>of</strong> life. Symptoms include headaches, dizziness, nausea, fatigue, shortness<br />
<strong>of</strong> breath, <strong>and</strong> difficulty in concentrating. Fragrance materials are readily absorbed into the<br />
body via the respiratory system <strong>and</strong> once absorbed they cause systemic effects.<br />
Migraine headaches are frequently triggered by fragrances that can act on the same receptors in<br />
the brain as alcohol <strong>and</strong> tobacco, altering mood <strong>and</strong> function [Institute <strong>of</strong> Medicine USA, sponsored<br />
by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)]. Perfumes <strong>and</strong> fragrances are recognized as triggers<br />
for asthma by the American Lung Association. The vast majority <strong>of</strong> materials used in fragrances<br />
are respiratory irritants <strong>and</strong> there are a few that are known to be respiratory sensitizers.<br />
Most have not been evaluated for their effects on the lungs <strong>and</strong> the respiratory system.<br />
Respiratory irritants are known to make the airways more susceptible to injury <strong>and</strong> allergens, as<br />
well as to trigger <strong>and</strong> exacerbate conditions such as asthma, allergies, sinus problems, <strong>and</strong> other<br />
respiratory disorders. In addition, there is a subset <strong>of</strong> asthmatics that is specifically triggered by<br />
fragrances (Shim <strong>and</strong> Williams, 1986; Bell et al., 1993; Baldwin et al., 1999), which suggests that<br />
fragrances not only trigger asthma, they may also cause it in some cases (Millqvist <strong>and</strong> Lowhagen,<br />
1996). Placebo-controlled studies using perfumes to challenge people with asthma-like symptoms<br />
showed that asthma could be elicited with perfumes without the presence <strong>of</strong> bronchial obstruction<br />
<strong>and</strong> these were not transmitted by the olfactory nerve as the patients were unaware <strong>of</strong> the smell<br />
(Millqvist <strong>and</strong> Lowhagen, 1996).<br />
Adverse reactions to fragrances are difficult or even impossible to link to a particular chemical—<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten due to secrecy rules <strong>of</strong> the cosmetic/perfumery companies <strong>and</strong> the enormous range <strong>of</strong> synthetic<br />
components, constituting about 90% <strong>of</strong> flavor <strong>and</strong> fragrance ingredients (Larsen, 1998). The<br />
same chemicals are used in foods <strong>and</strong> cosmetics—there is, therefore, a greater impact due to the<br />
three different modes <strong>of</strong> entry: oral, inhalation, <strong>and</strong> skin.<br />
13.17.1 INCREASE IN ALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS IN RECENT YEARS<br />
A study <strong>of</strong> 1600 adults in 1987 showed that 12% reacted adversely to cosmetics <strong>and</strong> toiletries,<br />
4.3% <strong>of</strong> which were used for their odor (i.e., they contained high levels <strong>of</strong> fragrances). Respiratory<br />
problems worsened with prolonged fragrance exposure (e.g., at cosmetic/perfumery counters) <strong>and</strong><br />
even in churches. In another study, 32% <strong>of</strong> the women tested had adverse reactions <strong>and</strong> 80% <strong>of</strong><br />
these had positive skin tests for fragrances (deGroot <strong>and</strong> Frosch, 1987). Problems with essential<br />
oils have also been increasing. For example, contact dermatitis <strong>and</strong> allergic contact dermatitis<br />
(ACD) caused by tea tree oil has been reported, which was previously considered to be safe (Carson<br />
<strong>and</strong> Riley, 1995). It is unclear whether eucalyptol was responsible for the allergenic response<br />
(Southwell, 1997); out <strong>of</strong> seven patients sensitized to tea tree oil, six reacted to limonene, five to<br />
a-terpinene <strong>and</strong> aromadendrene, two to terpinen-4-ol, <strong>and</strong> one to p-cymene <strong>and</strong> a-phell<strong>and</strong>rene<br />
(Knight <strong>and</strong> Hausen, 1994).
Aromatherapy with <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 567<br />
Many studies on ACD have been done in different parts <strong>of</strong> the world (deGroot <strong>and</strong> Frosch, 1987)<br />
<strong>and</strong> recently more studies have appeared:<br />
• Japan (Sugiura et al., 2000): The patch test with lavender oil was found to be positive in<br />
increased numbers <strong>and</strong> above that <strong>of</strong> other essential oils in 10 years.<br />
• Denmark (Johansen et al., 2000): There was an 11% increase in the patch test in the last<br />
year <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> 1537 patients, 29% were allergic to scents.<br />
• Hungary (Katona <strong>and</strong> Egyud, 2001): Increased sensitivity to balsams <strong>and</strong> fragrances was<br />
noted.<br />
• Switzerl<strong>and</strong> (Kohl et al., 2002): ACD incidence has increased over the years <strong>and</strong> recently<br />
36% <strong>of</strong> 819 patch tests were positive to cosmetics.<br />
• Belgium (Kohl et al., 2002): Increased incidence <strong>of</strong> ACD has been noted.<br />
Occupational increases have also been observed. Two aromatherapists developed ACD: one to<br />
citrus, neroli, lavender, frankincense, <strong>and</strong> rosewood <strong>and</strong> the other to geraniol, ylang ylang, <strong>and</strong><br />
angelica (Keane et al., 2000). Allergic airborne contact dermatitis from the essential oils used in<br />
aromatherapy was also reported (Schaller <strong>and</strong> Korting, 1995). ACD occurred in an aromatherapist<br />
due to French marigold essential oil, Tagetes (Bilsl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Strong, 1990). A physiotherapist developed<br />
ACD to eugenol, cloves, <strong>and</strong> cinnamon (Sanchez-Perez <strong>and</strong> Garcia Diez, 1999).<br />
There is also the growing problem that patients with eczema are frequently treated by aromatherapists<br />
using massage with essential oils. A possible allergic response to a variety <strong>of</strong> essential oils<br />
was found in children with atopic eczema, who were massaged with or without the oils. At first, both<br />
massages proved beneficial, though not significantly different; but on reapplying the essential oil<br />
massage after a month’s break, there was a notable adverse effect on the eczema, which could suggest<br />
sensitization (Anderson et al., 2000).<br />
13.17.2 PHOTOSENSITIZERS<br />
Berlocque dermatitis is frequently caused by bergamot or other citrus oil applications on the skin<br />
(<strong>of</strong>ten due to their inclusion in eau de Cologne) followed by exposure to UV light. This effect is caused<br />
by psolarens or furanocoumarins (Klarmann, 1958). Citrus essential oils labeled FCF have no phototoxic<br />
effect, but are suspected carcinogens (Young et al., 1990). Other phototoxic essential oils include<br />
yarrow <strong>and</strong> angelica, neroli, petitgrain, cedarwood, rosemary, cassia, calamus, cade, eucalyptus (species<br />
not stated), orange, anise, bay, bitter almond, ylang ylang, carrot seed, <strong>and</strong> linaloe (the latter probably<br />
due to linalool, which, like citronellol, has a sensitizing methylene group exposed) (Guin, 1995).<br />
Photosensitizer oils include cumin, rue, dill, s<strong>and</strong>alwood, lemon (oil <strong>and</strong> expressed), lime (oil <strong>and</strong><br />
expressed), opoponax, <strong>and</strong> verbena (the latter being frequently adulterated) (Klarmann, 1958). Even<br />
celery soup eaten before UV irradiation has been known to cause severe sunburn (B<strong>of</strong>fa et al., 1996).<br />
Many <strong>of</strong> these photosensitizers are now banned or restricted. New International Fragrance<br />
Research Association (IFRA) proposals for some phototoxic essential oils include rue oil to be<br />
0.15% maximum in consumer products, marigold oil <strong>and</strong> absolute to be 0.01%, <strong>and</strong> petitgrain<br />
m<strong>and</strong>arin oil to be 0.165%.<br />
13.17.3 COMMONEST ALLERGENIC ESSENTIAL OILS AND COMPONENTS<br />
The most common fragrance components causing allergy are cinnamic alcohol, hydroxycitronellal,<br />
musk ambrette, isoeugenol, <strong>and</strong> geraniol (Scheinman, 1996). These are included in the eight<br />
commonest markers used to check for ACD, usually as a 2% mix. Other components considered<br />
allergenic are benzyl salicylate, s<strong>and</strong>alwood oil, anisyl alcohol, benzyl alcohol, <strong>and</strong> coumarin.<br />
IFRA <strong>and</strong> RIFM have forbidden the use <strong>of</strong> several essential oils <strong>and</strong> components, including<br />
costus root oil, dihydrocoumarin, musk ambrette, <strong>and</strong> balsam <strong>of</strong> Peru (Ford, 1991); a concentration
568 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
limit is imposed on the use <strong>of</strong> isoeugenol, cold-pressed lemon oil, bergamot oil, angelica root oil,<br />
cassia oil, cinnamic alcohol, hydroxycitronellal, <strong>and</strong> oakmoss absolute. Cinnamic aldehyde, citral,<br />
<strong>and</strong> carvone oxide can only be used with a quenching agent.<br />
Photosensitivity <strong>and</strong> phototoxicity occurs with some allergens such as musk ambrette <strong>and</strong><br />
6-methyl coumarin that are now removed from skin care products. Children were <strong>of</strong>ten found to be<br />
sensitive to Peru balsam, probably due to the use <strong>of</strong> baby-care products containing this (e.g., talcum<br />
powder used on nappy rash).<br />
Fragrance materials have been found to interact with food flavorings, for example, a “balsam <strong>of</strong><br />
Peru-free diet” has been devised in cases where cross reactions are known to occur (Veien et al.,<br />
1985). “Newer” sensitizers include ylang ylang (Romaguera <strong>and</strong> Vilplana, 2000), s<strong>and</strong>alwood oil<br />
(Sharma et al., 1994) but much <strong>of</strong> this essential oil is adulterated or completely synthetic, lyral<br />
(Frosch et al., 1999; Hendriks et al., 1999), <strong>and</strong> eucalyptol (Vilaplana <strong>and</strong> Romaguera, 2000).<br />
Some sensitizers have been shown to interact with other molecules. For example, cinnamaldehyde<br />
interacts with proteins (Weibel et al., 1989), indicating how the immunogenicity occurs.<br />
There have been very few published reports on neurotoxic aromachemicals such as musk ambrette<br />
(Spencer et al., 1984), although many synthetic musks took over as perfume ingredients when public<br />
opinion turned against the exploitation <strong>of</strong> animal products. Musk ambrette was found to have neurotoxic<br />
properties in orally fed mice in 1967 <strong>and</strong> was readily absorbed through the skin. A similar story<br />
occurred with acetylethyltetramethyltetralin (AETT), another synthetic musk, also known as versalide,<br />
patented in the early 1950s. During routine tests for irritancy in 1975, it was noted that with<br />
repeated applications, the skin <strong>of</strong> the mice turned bluish <strong>and</strong> they exhibited signs <strong>of</strong> neurotoxicity. The<br />
myelin sheath was damaged irreversibly in a manner similar to that which occurs with multiple sclerosis.<br />
Musk xylene, one <strong>of</strong> the commonest fragrance materials, is found in blood samples from the<br />
general population (Kafferlein et al., 1998) <strong>and</strong> bound to human hemoglobin (Riedel et al., 1999).<br />
These musk products have been found to have an effect on the life stages <strong>of</strong> experimental animals such<br />
as the frog, Xenopus laevis, the zebra fish, Danio rerio (Chou <strong>and</strong> Dietrich, 1999), <strong>and</strong> the rat (Christian<br />
et al., 1999). The hepatotoxic effect <strong>of</strong> musks is under constant study (Steinberg et al., 1999).<br />
13.17.4 TOXICITY IN YOUNG CHILDREN: A SPECIAL CASE<br />
Many aromatherapy books give dangerous advice on the treatment <strong>of</strong> babies <strong>and</strong> children, for example,<br />
5–10 drops <strong>of</strong> “chamomile oil” three times a day in a little warmed milk given to their babies to<br />
treat colic with no indication as to which <strong>of</strong> the three commercially available chamomile oils is to<br />
be used <strong>and</strong> because, depending on the dropper size, the dose could easily approach the oral LD50<br />
for the English <strong>and</strong> German chamomile oils, this could result in a fatality. Peppermint, <strong>of</strong>ten mentioned,<br />
could possibly be given by mothers in the form <strong>of</strong> oil, <strong>and</strong> has been known to kill a 1-weekold<br />
baby (Evening St<strong>and</strong>ard, 1998). Dosages given in terms <strong>of</strong> drops can vary widely according to<br />
the size <strong>of</strong> the dropper in an essential oil.<br />
Many “cosmetics” designed for use by children contain fragrance allergens (Rastogi et al., 1999).<br />
In Denmark, samples <strong>of</strong> children’s cosmetics were found to contain geraniol, hydroxycitronellol,<br />
isoeugenol, <strong>and</strong> cinnamic alcohol (Rastogi et al., 1999). Children are more susceptible than adults<br />
to any chemical, so the increase in childhood asthma reported in recent years could be caused by<br />
fragrance components also found in fast foods. Aromatherapy therefore could be dangerous.<br />
13.17.5 SELECTED TOXICITIES OF COMMON ESSENTIAL OILS AND THEIR COMPONENTS<br />
Limonene <strong>and</strong> Linalool are found in a multitude <strong>of</strong> the commonest aromatherapy oils.<br />
Limonene is a common industrial cleaner <strong>and</strong> is also the main citrus oil component, which<br />
causes ACD, particularly when aged (Chang et al., 1997; Karlberg <strong>and</strong> Dooms-Goossens, 1997).<br />
The major volatile component <strong>of</strong> lactating mothers’ milk in the USA was found to contain d-limonene<br />
<strong>and</strong> the component is used as a potential skin penetration promoter for drugs such as indometacin,
Aromatherapy with <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 569<br />
especially when mixed with ethanol (Falk-Filipsson et al., 1993). Lastly, cats <strong>and</strong> dogs are very<br />
susceptible to insecticides <strong>and</strong> baths containing d-limonene, giving rise to neurological symptoms<br />
including ataxia, stiffness, apparent severe CNS depression, tremors, <strong>and</strong> coma (von Burg, 1995; see<br />
also Beasley, 1999).<br />
Linalool, when oxidized for just 10 weeks, the linalool content fell to 80% <strong>and</strong> the remaining<br />
20% consisted <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> breakdown chemicals including linalool hydroperoxide, which was<br />
confirmed as a sensitizing agent. The fresh linalool was not a sensitizer; therefore, the EC regulations<br />
that are warnings about sensitization potential are looking for potential harm even on storage<br />
(Skoeld et al., 2002a, 2002b).<br />
Most cosmetics <strong>and</strong> perfumes are tested on human “guinea pigs” using similar tests to those<br />
described for animals. These are dem<strong>and</strong>ed by the RIFM as a final test before marketing a product.<br />
Further data are accumulated from notifications from disgruntled consumers who report dermatitis,<br />
itching, or skin discoloration after use. These notifications can result in legal claims, although most<br />
cases are probably settled out <strong>of</strong> court <strong>and</strong> not reported to the general public.<br />
The internet has made it possible for a trusting, although <strong>of</strong>ten ill-informed, public to purchase a<br />
wide range <strong>of</strong> dubious plant extracts <strong>and</strong> essential oils. Even illegal essential oils can now be<br />
obtained. Furthermore, unqualified people can <strong>of</strong>fer potentially dangerous advice, such as internal<br />
usage or the use <strong>of</strong> undiluted essential oils on the skin for “mummification,” or in order to rid the<br />
body <strong>of</strong> toxic waste. The latter can result in excruciating pain from the burns produced <strong>and</strong> the<br />
subsequent loss <strong>of</strong> layers <strong>of</strong> skin.<br />
There is a recipe for suntan oil, including bergamot, carrot seed, <strong>and</strong> lemon essential oils (all<br />
phototoxic) in an aromatherapy book (Fischer-Rizzi, 1990). The author then advises that bergamot<br />
oil is added to suntan lotion to get the bonus <strong>of</strong> the substance called “furocumarin,” which lessens<br />
the skin’s sensitivity to the sun while it helps one to tan quickly. This could cause severe burns.<br />
Elsewhere, sassafras (Ocotea pretiosa) was said to be only toxic for rats, due to its metabolism <strong>and</strong><br />
not dangerous to humans (Pénoel, 1991a, 1991b) <strong>and</strong> a 10% solution in oil was suggested for treating<br />
muscular <strong>and</strong> joint pain <strong>and</strong> sports injuries. Safrole (<strong>and</strong> sassafras oil) is, however, controlled under<br />
the Controlled Drugs Regulations (1993) <strong>and</strong> listed as a Category 1 substance, as it is a precursor to<br />
the illicit manufacture <strong>of</strong> hallucinogenic, narcotic, <strong>and</strong> psychotropic drugs like ecstasy.<br />
French practitioners <strong>and</strong> other therapists have apparently become “familiar” with untested oils<br />
(Guba, 2000). The use <strong>of</strong> toxicologically untested Nepalese essential oils <strong>and</strong> the like includes<br />
lichen resinoids, sug<strong>and</strong>ha kokila oil, jatamansi oil, <strong>and</strong> Nepalese lemongrass (Cymbopogon<br />
flexuosa), also Tagetes oil (Basnyet, 1999). Melaleuca rosalina (Melaleuca ericifolia), 1,8-cineole<br />
18–26%, is apparently especially useful for the respiratory system (Pénoel, 1998), but it is untested<br />
<strong>and</strong> could be a sensitizer.<br />
The Medicines <strong>and</strong> Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency in the United Kingdom may bring<br />
about changes in aromatherapy practice similar to their threat on herbal remedies. Aromatherapists<br />
are now using some potentially harmful products in their therapy. This immediately places them at<br />
serious risk if there is any untoward reaction to their specific treatment. It virtually means that<br />
bottles <strong>and</strong> containers <strong>of</strong> essential oils now rank with domestic bleach for labeling purposes <strong>and</strong><br />
companies are now obliged to self-classify their essential oils on their labels <strong>and</strong> place them in suitable<br />
containers; this applies both to large distributing companies as well as individual aromatherapists<br />
reselling essential oils under their own name. Finally, new legislation has gone to the Council<br />
<strong>of</strong> Ministers <strong>and</strong> may imply that only qualified people will be able to use essential oils, <strong>and</strong> retail<br />
outlets for oils will be pharmacies. Their definition <strong>of</strong> “qualified” is limited to academic<br />
qualifications—doctors or pharmacists.<br />
13.18 CLINICAL STUDIES OF AROMATHERAPY<br />
Very few scientific clinical studies on the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy have been published to<br />
date. Perhaps the main reason is that until recently scientists were not involved <strong>and</strong> people engaging
570 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
in aromatherapy clinical studies had accepted the aromatherapy doctrine in its entirety, precluding<br />
any possibility <strong>of</strong> a nonbiased study. This has been evident in the design <strong>and</strong> execution <strong>of</strong> the studies;<br />
the main criterion has usually been the use <strong>of</strong> massage with essential oils <strong>and</strong> not the effect <strong>of</strong><br />
the odorant itself. The latter is considered by most aromatherapists as irrelevant to clinical aromatherapy,<br />
which implies that it is simply the systemic action <strong>of</strong> essential oils absorbed through the<br />
skin that exerts an effect on specific organs or tissues. Odorant action is considered to be just “aromachology,”<br />
despite its enormous psychological <strong>and</strong> physiological impact (Lis-Balchin, 2006). In<br />
some studies, attempts are even made to bypass the odorant effect entirely by making the subjects<br />
wear oxygen masks throughout (Dunn et al., 1995).<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> particular essential oils for certain medical conditions is also adhered to, despite the<br />
wide assortment <strong>of</strong> supposed functions for each essential oil claimed by different aromatherapy<br />
source materials. In many studies, it is even unclear exactly which essential oil was used; as <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
the correct nomenclature, chemical composition, <strong>and</strong> exact purity are not given.<br />
Many aromatherapists feel that they know that aromatherapy works as they have enormous numbers<br />
<strong>of</strong> case studies to prove it. But the production <strong>of</strong> lists <strong>of</strong> “positive” results on diverse clients,<br />
with diverse ailments, using diverse essential oils in the treatments, <strong>and</strong> diverse methods <strong>of</strong> application<br />
(which also frequently change from visit to visit for the same client) does not satisfy scientific<br />
criteria.<br />
Negative results must surely be among the positive ones, due to the change in essential oils during<br />
the course <strong>of</strong> the treatment, which suggests that they did not work, but these are never stated.<br />
There are also no controls in case studies <strong>and</strong> no attempt to control the bias <strong>of</strong> the individual aromatherapist<br />
<strong>and</strong> clients.<br />
Double-blind studies are not possible in individual case studies. Physiological or psychological<br />
changes due to the treatment are not properly defined <strong>and</strong> loose phrases such as “the client felt<br />
better” or “happier” are inappropriate for a scientific study.<br />
These faults in the design <strong>and</strong> interpretation <strong>of</strong> results <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy research have been<br />
pointed out many times, for example, in Vickers (1996) Kirk-Smith (1996a), Nelson (1997), <strong>and</strong><br />
Lis-Balchin (2002b). However, the lack <strong>of</strong> statistically significant results does not prevent many<br />
aromatherapists from accepting vaguely positive clinical research results <strong>and</strong> numerous poor-grade<br />
clinical studies are now quoted as factual confirmations that aromatherapy works.<br />
It is almost impossible to do a double-blind study using odorants, as the patient <strong>and</strong> treatment<br />
provider would experience the odor differences <strong>and</strong> would inevitably react knowingly or unknowingly<br />
to that factor alone. The psychological effect(s) could be very diverse, as recall <strong>of</strong> odors can<br />
bring about very acute reactions in different people, depending on the individual’s past experiences<br />
<strong>and</strong> on the like (Lis-Balchin, 2006). Lastly, there is potential bias as patients receiving aromatherapy<br />
treatment could be grateful for the attention given to them <strong>and</strong>, not wanting to upset the givers<br />
<strong>of</strong> such attention, would state that they were better <strong>and</strong> happier than before.<br />
13.19 RECENT CLINICAL STUDIES<br />
13.19.1 AROMATHERAPY IN DEMENTIA<br />
A meticulously conducted double-blind study involved 72 dementia patients with clinically<br />
significant agitation treated with melissa oil (Ballard et al., 2002). Agitation included anxiety <strong>and</strong><br />
irritability, motor restlessness, <strong>and</strong> abnormal vocalization—symptoms that <strong>of</strong>ten lead to disturbed<br />
behaviors such as pacing, w<strong>and</strong>ering, aggression, shouting, <strong>and</strong> night-time disturbance, all<br />
characterized by appropriate inventories.<br />
Ten percent (by weight) melissa oil (active) or sunflower oil (placebo), combined with a base<br />
lotion (Prunus dulcis oil, glycerine, stearic acid, cetearyl alcohol, <strong>and</strong> tocopheryl acetate), was dispensed<br />
in metered doses <strong>and</strong> applied to the face <strong>and</strong> both arms twice daily for 4 weeks by a care
Aromatherapy with <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 571<br />
assistant, the process taking 1–2 min. The patients also received neuroleptic treatment <strong>and</strong> other<br />
conventional treatments when necessary; this was therefore a study <strong>of</strong> complementary aromatherapy<br />
treatment—not an alternative treatment.<br />
The “melissa group” showed a higher significant improvement in reducing aggression than the<br />
control group by week 4; the total Cohen–Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) scores had<br />
decreased significantly in both groups, from a mean <strong>of</strong> 68 to 45 (35%; P < .0001) in the treatment<br />
group <strong>and</strong> from 61 to 53 (11%; P < .005) in the placebo group. Clinically significant reduction in<br />
agitation occurred in 60% <strong>of</strong> the melissa group compared with 14% <strong>of</strong> placebo responders (P < .0001).<br />
Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) scores also declined with melissa treatment, <strong>and</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> life<br />
was improved, with less social isolation <strong>and</strong> more involvement in activities. The latter was in contrast<br />
to the usual neuroleptic treatment effects.<br />
The authors concluded that the melissa treatment was successful, but pointed out that there was<br />
also a significant, but lower, improvement in the control group <strong>and</strong> suggested that a stronger odor<br />
should have been used.<br />
The effect <strong>of</strong> the melissa oil was probably on cholinergic receptors as shown by previous in vitro<br />
studies (Perry et al., 1999; Wake et al., 2000). The authors also concluded that as most people with<br />
severe dementia have lost any meaningful sense <strong>of</strong> smell, a direct placebo effect due to a pleasantsmelling<br />
fragrance, although possible, is an unlikely explanation for the positive effects <strong>of</strong> melissa<br />
in this study but others may disagree with this conclusion as it has been shown that subliminal odors<br />
can have an effect. The fragrance may have had some impact upon the care staff, <strong>and</strong> influenced<br />
ratings to some degree on the informant schedules.<br />
A further recent study found no support for the use <strong>of</strong> a purely olfactory form <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy to<br />
decrease agitation in severely demented patients using lavender <strong>and</strong> thyme oil (Snow et al., 2004).<br />
Other research (Burns et al., 2002) suggested that aromatherapy <strong>and</strong> light therapy were more<br />
effective <strong>and</strong> gentler alternatives to the use <strong>of</strong> neuroleptics in patients with dementia. Three studies<br />
were analyzed in each category; in the aromatherapy section, it included the study above, plus the<br />
use <strong>of</strong> 2% lavender oil via inhalation in a double-blind study for 10 days (Holmes et al., 2002) <strong>and</strong> a<br />
2-week single-blind study using either aromatherapy plus massage, aromatherapy plus conversation<br />
or massage alone (Smallwood et al., 2001). All <strong>of</strong> the interventions in the aromatherapy groups<br />
proved significantly beneficial. However, so did the light treatment, where patients sat in front <strong>of</strong> a<br />
light box that beamed out 10,000 lux <strong>of</strong> artificial light, which adjusts the body’s melatonin levels,<br />
affects the body clock, <strong>and</strong> is used in the treatment <strong>of</strong> SAD (seasonal affective disorder).<br />
13.20 PAST CLINICAL STUDIES<br />
In contrast to more recent studies, past clinical trials were <strong>of</strong>ten very defective in design <strong>and</strong> also<br />
outcomes. In a recent review, Cooke <strong>and</strong> Ernst (2000) included only those aromatherapy trials that<br />
were r<strong>and</strong>omized <strong>and</strong> included human patients; they excluded those with no control group or if only<br />
local effects (e.g., antiseptic effects <strong>of</strong> tea tree oil) or preclinical studies on healthy volunteers<br />
occurred. The six trials included massage with or without aromatherapy (Buckle, 1993; Stevenson,<br />
1994; Corner et al., 1995; Dunn et al., 1995; Wilkinson, 1995; Wilkinson et al., 1999) <strong>and</strong> were based<br />
on their relaxation outcomes. The authors concluded that the effects <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy were probably<br />
not strong enough for it to be considered for the treatment <strong>of</strong> anxiety or for any other indication.<br />
A further study included trials with no replicates, <strong>and</strong> contained six studies. It showed that in five<br />
out <strong>of</strong> six cases the main outcomes were positive; however, these were limited to very specific criteria,<br />
such as small airways resistance for common colds (Cohen <strong>and</strong> Dressler, 1982), prophylaxis<br />
<strong>of</strong> bronchi for bronchitis (Ferley et al., 1989), lessening smoking withdrawal symptoms (Rose <strong>and</strong><br />
Behm, 1993, 1994), relief <strong>of</strong> anxiety (Morris et al., 1995), <strong>and</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong> alopecia areata (Hay<br />
et al., 1998). The alleviation <strong>of</strong> perineal discomfort (Dale <strong>and</strong> Cornwell, 1994) was not significant.<br />
Psychological effects, which include inhalation <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> behavioral changes, were<br />
already discussed.
572 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
13.20.1 CRITIQUE OF SELECTED CLINICAL TRIALS<br />
The following clinical studies attempted to show that aromatherapy was more efficient than massage<br />
alone but they showed mainly negative results; however, in some cases, the authors clearly<br />
emphasized some very small positive results <strong>and</strong> this was then accepted <strong>and</strong> the report was welcomed<br />
in aromatherapy journals as a positive trial that supported aromatherapy.<br />
Massage, aromatherapy massage, or a period <strong>of</strong> rest in 122 patients in an intensive care unit<br />
(ICU) (Dunn et al., 1995) showed no difference between massage with or without lavender oil <strong>and</strong><br />
no treatment in the physiological parameters <strong>and</strong> all psychological parameters showed no effects<br />
throughout, bar a significantly greater improvement in mood <strong>and</strong> in anxiety levels between the rest<br />
group <strong>and</strong> essential oil massage group after the first session. The trial had a large number <strong>of</strong> changeable<br />
parameters: it involved patients in the ICU for about 5 days (age range 2–92 years), who received<br />
1–3 therapy sessions in 24 h given by six different nurses. Massage was performed on the back or<br />
outside <strong>of</strong> limbs or scalp for 15–30 min with lavender (Lav<strong>and</strong>ula vera at 1% in grapeseed oil, which<br />
was the only constant parameter). The patients wore oxygen masks, for some <strong>of</strong> the time. It seems<br />
unlikely that confused patients in ICU could remember the massage or its effects <strong>and</strong> a child <strong>of</strong><br />
2 years could not be expected to answer any pertinent questions.<br />
Massage with <strong>and</strong> without Roman chamomile in 51 palliative care patients (Wilkinson, 1995)<br />
showed that both groups experienced the same decrease in symptoms <strong>and</strong> severity after three full<br />
body massages in 3 weeks. There was, however, a statistically significant difference between the<br />
two groups after the first aromatherapy massage <strong>and</strong> also an improvement in the “quality <strong>of</strong> life”<br />
from pre- to postmassage. German chamomile was likely to have been used, not Roman chamomile<br />
as stated, according to the chemical composition <strong>and</strong> potential bioactivity given.<br />
Aromatherapy with <strong>and</strong> without massage, <strong>and</strong> massage alone on disturbed behavior in four<br />
patients with severe dementia (Brooker et al., 1997), was an unusual single-case study evaluating<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> “true” aromatherapy (using inhaled lavender oil) for 10 treatments <strong>of</strong> each, r<strong>and</strong>omly<br />
given to each patient over a 3-month period <strong>and</strong> assessed against 10 no-treatment periods. Two<br />
patients became more agitated following their treatment sessions <strong>and</strong> only one patient seemed to<br />
have benefited. According to the staff providing the treatment, however, the use <strong>of</strong> all the treatments<br />
seemed to have been beneficial to the patients, suggesting pronounced bias.<br />
An investigation <strong>of</strong> the psychophysiological effects <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy massage following cardiac<br />
surgery (Stevenson, 1994) showed experimenter bias due to the statement that “neroli is also especially<br />
valuable in the relief <strong>of</strong> anxiety, it calms palpitations, has an antispasmodic effect <strong>and</strong> an<br />
anti-inflammatory effect … it is useful in the treatment <strong>of</strong> hysteria, as an antidepressant <strong>and</strong> a gentle<br />
sedative.” None <strong>of</strong> this has been scientifically proven, but as this was not a double-blind study <strong>and</strong><br />
presumably the author did the massaging, communicating, <strong>and</strong> collating information alone, bias is<br />
probable. Statistical significances were not shown, nor the age ranges <strong>of</strong> the 100 patients, <strong>and</strong> no<br />
differences between the aromatherapy-only <strong>and</strong> massage-only groups were shown, except for an<br />
immediate increase in respiratory rate when the two control groups (20 min chat or rest) were compared<br />
with the aromatherapy massage <strong>and</strong> massage-only groups.<br />
Atopic eczema in 32 children treated by massage with <strong>and</strong> without essential oils (Anderson et al.,<br />
2000) in a single-case experimental design across subjects showed that this complementary therapy<br />
provided no statistically significant differences between the two groups after 8 weeks <strong>of</strong> treatment.<br />
This indicated that massage <strong>and</strong> thereby regular parental contact <strong>and</strong> attention showed positive<br />
results, which was expected in these children. However, a continuation <strong>of</strong> the study, following a<br />
3-month period <strong>of</strong> rest, using only the essential oil massage group showed a possible sensitization<br />
effect, as the symptoms worsened.<br />
Massage using two different types <strong>of</strong> lavender oil on postcardiotomy patients (Buckle, 1993) was<br />
proclaimed to be a “double-blind” study but had no controls <strong>and</strong> the results by the author did not<br />
appear to be assessed correctly (Vickers, 1996). The author attempted to show that the “real” lavender<br />
showed significant benefits in the state <strong>of</strong> the patients compared with the other oil. However,
Aromatherapy with <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 573<br />
outcome measures were not described <strong>and</strong> the chemical composition <strong>and</strong> botanical names <strong>of</strong> the<br />
“real” <strong>and</strong> “not real” lavender remains a mystery, as three lavenders were stated in the text. Although<br />
the results were insignificant, this paper is quoted widely as pro<strong>of</strong> that only “real” essential oils<br />
work through aromatherapy massage.<br />
Aromatherapy trails in childbirth have been <strong>of</strong> dubious design <strong>and</strong> low scientific merit <strong>and</strong>, not<br />
surprisingly, have yielded confusing results (Burns <strong>and</strong> Blaney, 1994), mainly due to the numerous<br />
parameters incorporated. In the study by Burns <strong>and</strong> Blaney (1994), many different essential<br />
oils were used in various uncontrolled ways during childbirth <strong>and</strong> assessed using possibly biased<br />
criteria as to their possible benefits to the mother <strong>and</strong> midwife. The first pilot study used 585<br />
women in a delivery suite over a 6-month period using lavender, clary sage, peppermint, eucalyptus,<br />
chamomile, frankincense, jasmine, lemon, <strong>and</strong> m<strong>and</strong>arin. These oils were either used singly<br />
or as part <strong>of</strong> a mixture where they could be used as the first, second, third, or fourth essential oil.<br />
The essential oils were applied in many different ways <strong>and</strong> at different times during parturition,<br />
for example, sprayed in a “solution” in water onto a face flannel, pillow, or bean bag; in a bath;<br />
foot bath; an absorbent card for inhalation; or in almond oil for massage. Peppermint oil was<br />
applied as an undiluted drop on the forehead <strong>and</strong> frankincense onto the palm.<br />
Midwives <strong>and</strong> mothers filled in a form as to the effects <strong>of</strong> the essential oils including their relaxant<br />
value, effect on nausea <strong>and</strong> vomiting, analgesic action, mood enhancer action, accelerator, or not<br />
<strong>of</strong> labor. The results were inconclusive <strong>and</strong> there was a bias toward the use <strong>of</strong> a few oils, for example,<br />
lavender was stated to be “oestrogenic <strong>and</strong> used to calm down uterine tightenings if a woman was<br />
exhausted <strong>and</strong> needed sleep” <strong>and</strong> clary sage was given to “encourage the establishment <strong>of</strong> labor.”<br />
This shows complete bias <strong>and</strong> a belief in unproven clinical attributes by the authors <strong>and</strong> presumably<br />
those carrying out the study. Which <strong>of</strong> the lavender, peppermint, eucalyptus, chamomile, or frankincense<br />
species were used remains a mystery.<br />
The continuation <strong>of</strong> this study (Burns et al., 2000) on 8058 mothers during childbirth was<br />
intended to show that aromatherapy would “relieve anxiety, pain, nausea <strong>and</strong>/or vomiting, or<br />
strengthen contractions.” Data from the unit audit were compared with those <strong>of</strong> 15,799 mothers not<br />
given aromatherapy treatment. The results showed that 50% <strong>of</strong> the aromatherapy group mothers<br />
found the intervention “helpful” <strong>and</strong> only 14% “unhelpful.” The use <strong>of</strong> pethidine over the year<br />
declined from 6% to 0.2% by women in the aromatherapy group. The study also (apparently) showed<br />
that aromatherapy may have the potential to augment labor contractions for women in dysfunctional<br />
labor, in contrast to scientific data showing that the uterine contractions decrease due to administration<br />
<strong>of</strong> any common essential oils (Lis-Balchin <strong>and</strong> Hart, 1997).<br />
It is doubtful whether a woman would in her first labor, or in subsequent ones, be able to judge<br />
whether the contractions were strengthened or the labor shortened due to aromatherapy. It seems<br />
likely that there was some placebo effect (itself a very powerful effector) due to the bias <strong>of</strong> the<br />
experimenters <strong>and</strong> the “suggestions” made to the aromatherapy group regarding efficacy <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oils, which were obviously absent in the case <strong>of</strong> the control group.<br />
Lavender oil (volatilized from a burner during the night in their hospital room) has been successful<br />
in replacing medication to induce sleep in three out <strong>of</strong> four geriatrics (Hardy et al., 1995). There<br />
was a general deterioration in the sleep patterns when the medication was withdrawn, but lavender<br />
oil seemed to be as good as the original medication. However, the deterioration in the sleep patterns<br />
(due to “rebound insomnia”?) may simply have been due to recovery <strong>of</strong> normal sleep patterns when<br />
lavender was given (Vickers, 1996).<br />
The efficacy <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil was studied on postoperative nausea in 18 women after gynecological<br />
operations (Tate, 1997) using peppermint oil or a control, peppermint essence (obviously <strong>of</strong><br />
similar odor). A statistically significant difference was found between the controls <strong>and</strong> the test group.<br />
The test group required less antiemetics <strong>and</strong> received less opioid analgesia. However, the use <strong>of</strong> a<br />
peppermint essence as a control seems rather like having two test groups as inhalation was used.<br />
A group <strong>of</strong> 313 patients undergoing radiotherapy were r<strong>and</strong>omly assigned to receive either<br />
carrier oil with fractionated oils, carrier oil only, or pure essential oils <strong>of</strong> lavender, bergamot, <strong>and</strong>
574 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
cedarwood administered by inhalation concurrently with radiation treatment. There were no<br />
significant differences in Hospital Anxiety <strong>and</strong> Depression Score (HADS) <strong>and</strong> other scores between<br />
the r<strong>and</strong>omly assigned groups. Aromatherapy, as administered in this study, was not found to be<br />
beneficial (Graham et al., 2003).<br />
Heliotropin, a sweet, vanilla-like scent, reduced anxiety during magnetic resonance imaging<br />
(Redd <strong>and</strong> Manne, 1991), which causes distress to many patients as they are enclosed in a “c<strong>of</strong>fin”-like<br />
apparatus. Patients experienced approximately 63% less overall anxiety than a control group <strong>of</strong><br />
patients.<br />
A double-blind r<strong>and</strong>omized trial was conducted on 66 women undergoing abortions (Wiebe,<br />
2000). Ten minutes were spent sniffing a numbered container with either a mixture <strong>of</strong> the essential<br />
oils (vetivert, bergamot, <strong>and</strong> geranium) or a hair conditioner (placebo). Aromatherapy involving<br />
essential oils was no more effective than having patients sniff other pleasant odors in reducing preoperative<br />
anxiety.<br />
An audit into the effects <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy in palliative care (Evans, 1995) showed that the most<br />
frequently used oils were lavender, marjoram, <strong>and</strong> chamomile. These were applied over a period <strong>of</strong><br />
6 months by a therapist available for 4 h on a weekly basis in the ward. Relaxing music was played<br />
throughout, each session to allay fears <strong>of</strong> the h<strong>and</strong>s-on massage. The results revealed that 81% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
patients stated that they either felt “better” or “very relaxed” after the treatment; most appreciated<br />
the music greatly. The researchers themselves confessed that it is uncertain whether the benefits<br />
were the result <strong>of</strong> the patient being given individual attention, talking with the therapist, the effects<br />
<strong>of</strong> touch <strong>and</strong> massage, the effects <strong>of</strong> the aromatherapy essential oils, or the effects <strong>of</strong> the relaxation<br />
music.<br />
Aromatherapy massage studied in eight cancer patients did not show any psychological benefit.<br />
However, there was a statistically significant reduction in all <strong>of</strong> the four physical parameters, which<br />
suggests that aromatherapy massage affects the autonomic nervous system, inducing relaxation.<br />
This finding was supported by the patients themselves, all <strong>of</strong> whom stated during interview that they<br />
felt “relaxed” after aromatherapy massage (Hadfield, 2001).<br />
Forty-two cancer patients were r<strong>and</strong>omly allocated to receive weekly massages with lavender<br />
essential oil in carrier oil (aromatherapy group), carrier oil only (massage group), or no intervention<br />
for 4 weeks (Soden et al., 2004). Outcome measures included a visual analogue scale (VAS) <strong>of</strong> pain<br />
intensity, the Verran <strong>and</strong> Snyder–Halpern Sleep Scale (VSH), the Hospital Anxiety <strong>and</strong> Depression<br />
Scale (HADS), <strong>and</strong> the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL). No significant long-term benefits <strong>of</strong><br />
aromatherapy or massage in terms <strong>of</strong> improving pain control, anxiety, or quality <strong>of</strong> life were shown.<br />
However, sleep scores improved significantly in both the massage <strong>and</strong> the combined massage (aromatherapy<br />
<strong>and</strong> massage) groups. There were also statistically significant reductions in depression<br />
scores in the massage group. In this study <strong>of</strong> patients with advanced cancer, the addition <strong>of</strong> lavender<br />
essential oil did not appear to increase the beneficial effects <strong>of</strong> massage.<br />
A r<strong>and</strong>omized controlled pilot study was carried out to examine the effects <strong>of</strong> adjunctive aromatherapy<br />
massage on mood, quality <strong>of</strong> life, <strong>and</strong> physical symptoms in patients with cancer attending<br />
a specialist unit (Wilcock et al., 2004). Patients were r<strong>and</strong>omized to conventional day care<br />
alone, or day care plus weekly aromatherapy massage using a st<strong>and</strong>ardized blend <strong>of</strong> oils for 4 weeks.<br />
At baseline <strong>and</strong> at weekly intervals, patients rated their mood, quality <strong>of</strong> life, <strong>and</strong> the intensity <strong>and</strong><br />
bother <strong>of</strong> two symptoms most important to them. However, although 46 patients were recruited to<br />
the study, only 11 <strong>of</strong> 23 (48%) patients in the aromatherapy group <strong>and</strong> 18 <strong>of</strong> 23 (78%) in the control<br />
group completed all 4 weeks. Mood, physical symptoms, <strong>and</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> life improved in both groups<br />
but there was no statistically significant difference between groups, but all patients were satisfied<br />
with the aromatherapy <strong>and</strong> wished to continue it.<br />
Aromatherapy sessions in deaf <strong>and</strong> deaf–blind people became an accepted, enjoyable, <strong>and</strong> therapeutic<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the residents’ lifestyle in an uncontrolled series <strong>of</strong> case studies. It appeared that this<br />
gentle, noninvasive therapy could benefit deaf <strong>and</strong> deaf–blind people, especially as their intact<br />
senses can be heightened (Armstrong <strong>and</strong> Heidingsfeld, 2000).
Aromatherapy with <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 575<br />
A scientifically unacceptable study <strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy on endometriosis, reported only<br />
at an aromatherapy conference (Worwood, 1996), involved 22 aromatherapists who treated a total<br />
<strong>of</strong> 17 women in two groups over 24 weeks. One group was initially given massage with essential oils<br />
<strong>and</strong> then not “touched” for the second period, while the second group had the two treatments<br />
reversed. Among the many parameters measured were constipation, vaginal discharge, fluid retention,<br />
abdominal <strong>and</strong> pelvic pain, degree <strong>of</strong> feeling well, renewed vigor, depression, <strong>and</strong> tiredness.<br />
The data were presented as means (or averages, possibly, as this was not stated) but without st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
errors <strong>of</strong> mean (SEM) <strong>and</strong> lacked any statistical analyses. Unfortunately, the study has been accepted<br />
by many aromatherapists as being a conclusive pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the value in treating endometriosis using<br />
aromatherapy.<br />
In all the trials above, there was a more positive outcome for aromatherapy if there were no stringent<br />
scientific double-blind <strong>and</strong> r<strong>and</strong>omized control measures, suggesting that in the latter case, bias<br />
is removed.<br />
13.21 USE OF ESSENTIAL OILS MAINLY AS CHEMICAL AGENTS<br />
AND NOT FOR THEIR ODOR<br />
The efficacy <strong>and</strong> safety <strong>of</strong> capsules containing peppermint oil (90 mg) <strong>and</strong> caraway oil (50 mg),<br />
when studied in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia<br />
was shown by May et al. (1996). Intensity <strong>of</strong> pain was significantly improved for the experimental<br />
group compared with the placebo group after 4 weeks.<br />
Six drops <strong>of</strong> pure lavender oil included in the bath water for 10 days following childbirth was<br />
assessed against “synthetic” lavender oil <strong>and</strong> a placebo (distilled water containing an unknown GRAS<br />
additive) for perineal discomfort (Cornwell <strong>and</strong> Dale, 1995). No significant differences between<br />
groups were found for discomfort, but lower scores in discomfort means for days 3 <strong>and</strong> 5 for the<br />
lavender group were seen. This was very unsatisfactory as a scientific study, mainly because essential<br />
oils do not mix with water <strong>and</strong> there was no pro<strong>of</strong> whether the lavender oil itself was pure.<br />
Alopecia areata was treated in a r<strong>and</strong>omized trial using “aromatherapy” carried out over 7<br />
months. The test group massaged a mixture <strong>of</strong> 2 drops <strong>of</strong> Thymus vulgaris, 3 drops Lav<strong>and</strong>ula<br />
angustifolia, 3 drops <strong>of</strong> Rosmarinus <strong>of</strong>ficinalis, <strong>and</strong> 2 drops <strong>of</strong> Cedrus atlantica in 3 mL <strong>of</strong> jojoba<br />
<strong>and</strong> 20 mL grapeseed oil into the scalp for 2 min minimum every night. The control group massaged<br />
the carrier oils alone (Hay et al., 1998). There was a significant improvement in the test group<br />
(44%) compared with the control group (15%). The smell <strong>of</strong> the essential oils (psychological/physiological)<br />
<strong>and</strong>/or their chemical nature on the scalp may have achieved these long-term results. On<br />
the other h<strong>and</strong>, the scalp may have healed naturally anyway after 7 months.<br />
Ureterolithiasis was treated with Rowatinex, a mixture <strong>of</strong> terpenes smelling like Vicks VapoRub<br />
in 43 patients against a control group treated with a placebo. The overall expulsion rate <strong>of</strong> the ureteric<br />
stones was greater in the Rowatinex group (Engelstein et al., 1992). Similar mixes have shown<br />
both positive <strong>and</strong> negative results on gallstones over the years.<br />
In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, r<strong>and</strong>omized crossover study involving 332 healthy subjects,<br />
four different preparations were used to treat headaches (Gobel et al., 1994). Peppermint oil,<br />
eucalyptus oil (species not stated), <strong>and</strong> ethanol were applied to large areas <strong>of</strong> the forehead <strong>and</strong><br />
temples. A combination <strong>of</strong> the three increased cognitive performance, muscle relaxation, <strong>and</strong> mental<br />
relaxation, but had no influence on pain. Peppermint oil <strong>and</strong> ethanol decreased the headache. The<br />
reason for the success could have been the intense coldness caused by the application <strong>of</strong> the latter<br />
mixture, which was followed by a warming up as the peppermint oil caused counterirritation on the<br />
skin; the essential oils were also inhaled.<br />
A clinical trial on 124 patients with acne, r<strong>and</strong>omly distributed to a group treated with 5% tea<br />
tree oil gel or a 5% benzoyl peroxide lotion group (Bassett et al., 1990), showed improvement in both<br />
groups <strong>and</strong> fewer side effects in the tea tree oil group. The use <strong>of</strong> tea tree oil has, however, had<br />
detrimental effects in some people (Lis-Balchin, 2006, Chapter 7).
576 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
A 10% tea tree oil was used on 104 patients with athlete’s foot Tinea pedis) in a r<strong>and</strong>omized<br />
double-blind study against 1% tolnaflate <strong>and</strong> placebo creams. The tolnaflate group showed a better<br />
effect; tea tree oil was as effective in improving the condition, but was no better than the placebo at<br />
curing it (Tong et al., 1992). Surprisingly, tea tree oil is sold as a cure for athlete’s foot.<br />
13.21.1 SINGLE-CASE STUDIES<br />
In the past few years, the theme <strong>of</strong> the case studies (reported mainly in aromatherapy journals) has<br />
started to change <strong>and</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the aromatherapists are no longer announcing that they are “curing”<br />
cancer <strong>and</strong> other serious diseases. Emphasis has swung toward real complementary treatment, <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
in the area <strong>of</strong> palliative care. However, the so-called clinical aromatherapists persist in attempting<br />
to cure various medical conditions using high doses <strong>of</strong> oils mainly by mouth, vagina, anus, or on the<br />
skin. Many believe that healing wounds using essential oils is also classed as aromatherapy (Guba,<br />
2000) despite the evidence that odor does not kill germs <strong>and</strong> any effect is due to the chemical activity<br />
alone.<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> scientific evidence in many studies, we could assume that aromatherapy is<br />
mainly based on faith; it works because the aromatherapist believes in the treatment <strong>and</strong> because the<br />
patient believes in the supposed action <strong>of</strong> essential oils, that is, the placebo effect.<br />
Decreased smoking withdrawal symptoms in 48 cigarette smokers were achieved by black pepper<br />
oil puffed out <strong>of</strong> a special instrument for 3 h after an overnight cigarette deprivation against<br />
mint/menthol or nothing (Rose <strong>and</strong> Behm, 1994).<br />
Chronic respiratory infection was successfully treated when the patient was massaged with tea<br />
tree, rosemary, <strong>and</strong> bergamot oils while on her second course <strong>of</strong> antibiotics <strong>and</strong> taking a proprietary<br />
cough medicine. She also used lavender <strong>and</strong> rosemary oils in her bath, a drop <strong>of</strong> eucalyptus oil <strong>and</strong><br />
lavender oil on her tissue near the pillow at night, 3 drops <strong>of</strong> eucalyptus <strong>and</strong> ginger for inhalations<br />
daily, <strong>and</strong> reduced her dairy products <strong>and</strong> starches. In a week, her cough was better <strong>and</strong> by 3 weeks,<br />
it had gone (Laffan, 1992). It is unclear which treatment actually helped the patient, <strong>and</strong> as it took a<br />
long time, the infection may well have gone away by then, or sooner, without any medicinal aid.<br />
After just one treatment <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy massage using rose oil, bergamot, <strong>and</strong> lavender at 2.5%<br />
in almond oil, a 36-year-old woman managed to get pregnant after being told she was possibly infertile<br />
following the removal <strong>of</strong> her right fallopian tube (Rippon, 1993)!<br />
Aromatherapy can apparently help patients with multiple sclerosis, especially for relaxation, in<br />
association with many other changes in the diet <strong>and</strong> also use <strong>of</strong> conventional medicines (Barker,<br />
1994). French basil, black pepper, <strong>and</strong> true lavender in evening primrose oil with borage oil was<br />
used to counteract stiffness <strong>and</strong> also to stimulate; this mixture was later changed to include relaxing<br />
<strong>and</strong> sedative oils such as Roman chamomile, ylang ylang, <strong>and</strong> melissa.<br />
Specific improvements in clients given aromatherapy treatment in dementia include increased<br />
alertness, self-hygiene, contentment, initiation <strong>of</strong> toileting, sleeping at night, <strong>and</strong> reduced levels <strong>of</strong><br />
agitation, withdrawal, <strong>and</strong> w<strong>and</strong>ering. Family carers reported less distress, improved sleeping patterns,<br />
<strong>and</strong> calmness (Kilst<strong>of</strong>f <strong>and</strong> Chenoweth, 1998). Other patients with dementia were monitored<br />
over a period <strong>of</strong> 2 months, <strong>and</strong> then for a further 2 months during which they received aromatherapy<br />
treatments in a clinical trial; they showed a significant improvement in motivational behavior during<br />
the period <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy treatment (MacMahon <strong>and</strong> Kermode, 1998).<br />
13.22 CONCLUSION<br />
Aromatherapy, using essential oils as an odorant by inhalation or massage onto the skin, has not<br />
been shown to work better than massage alone or a control. No failures have, however, been reported,<br />
although treatment is invariably changed on each visit. Many patients feel better, even if their disease<br />
is getting worse, due to their belief in an alternative therapist <strong>and</strong> this is a good example <strong>of</strong><br />
“mind over matter,” that is, the placebo effect. This effect has been recommended by some members
Aromatherapy with <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 577<br />
<strong>of</strong> the House <strong>of</strong> Lords Select Committee on <strong>Science</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong>, Sixth Report (2000), as a good<br />
basis for retaining complementary <strong>and</strong> alternative medicine, but other members argued that scientific<br />
pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> effects is necessary.<br />
It is hoped that aromatherapists do not try to convince their patients <strong>of</strong> a cure, especially in the<br />
case <strong>of</strong> serious ailments such as cancer, which <strong>of</strong>ten recede naturally for a time on their own.<br />
Conventional treatment should always be advised in the first instance <strong>and</strong> retained during aromatherapy<br />
treatment with the consent <strong>of</strong> the patient’s primary healthcare physician or consultant.<br />
Aromatherapy can provide a useful complementary medical service both in healthcare settings <strong>and</strong><br />
in private practice, <strong>and</strong> should not be allowed to become listed as a bogus cure in alternative<br />
medicine.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Adams, T.B., et al., 1996. The FEMA GRAS assessment <strong>of</strong> alicyclic substances used as flavour ingredients.<br />
Food Chem. Toxicol., 34: 763–828.<br />
Ammon, H.P.T., 1989. Phytotherapeutika in der Kneipp-therapie. Therapiewoche, 39: 117–127.<br />
Anderson, C., et al., 2000. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> massage with essential oils on childhood atopic eczema. Phytother.<br />
Res., 14: 452–456.<br />
Arct<strong>and</strong>er, S., 1960. Perfume <strong>and</strong> Flavor Materials <strong>of</strong> Natural Origin. Elizabeth, NJ: S Arct<strong>and</strong>er.<br />
Armstrong, F. <strong>and</strong> V. Heidingsfeld, 2000. Aromatherapy for deaf <strong>and</strong> deafblind people living in residential<br />
accommodation. Compl. Ther. Nurs. Midwifery, 6: 180–188.<br />
Arnould-Taylor, W.E., 1981. A Textbook <strong>of</strong> Holistic Aromatherapy. London: Stanley Thornes.<br />
Atchley, E.G. <strong>and</strong> F. Cuthbert, 1909. A History <strong>of</strong> the Use <strong>of</strong> Incense in Divine Worship. London: Longmans,<br />
Green <strong>and</strong> Co.<br />
Badia, P., 1991. Olfactory sensitivity in sleep: The effects <strong>of</strong> fragrances on the quality <strong>of</strong> sleep: A summary <strong>of</strong><br />
research conducted for the fragrance research fund. Perf. Flav., 16: 33–34.<br />
Baldwin, C.M., et al., 1999. Odor sensitivity <strong>and</strong> respiratory complaint pr<strong>of</strong>iles in a community-based sample<br />
with asthma, hay fever, <strong>and</strong> chemical intolerance. Toxicol. Ind. Health., 15: 403–409.<br />
Ballard, C., et al., 2002. Aromatherapy as a safe <strong>and</strong> effective treatment for the management <strong>of</strong> agitation in severe<br />
dementia: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with Melissa. J. Clin. Psychiatry, 63: 553–558.<br />
Barker, A., 1994. Aromatherapy <strong>and</strong> multiple sclerosis. Aromather. Q, 4–6.<br />
Barrett, S., 2000. Aromatherapy company sued for false advertising. Quackwatch, September 25, http://www.<br />
quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/aroma.html, accessed 8 August 2009.<br />
Basnyet, J., 1999. Tibetan essential oils. IFA J., 43: 12–13.<br />
Bassett, I.B., et al., 1990. A comparative study <strong>of</strong> tea tree oil versus benzoylperoxide in the treatment <strong>of</strong> acne.<br />
Med. J. Aust., 153: 455–458.<br />
Beasley, V., ed., 1999. Toxicants that cause central nervous system depression. Veterinary Toxicology. Ithaca,<br />
NY: International Veterinary Information Service (www.ivis.org), A2608.0899.<br />
Bell, I.R., et al., 1993. Self-reported illness from chemical odors in young adults without clinical syndromes<br />
or occupational exposures. Arch. Environ. Health, 48: 6–13.<br />
Benson, H. <strong>and</strong> M. Stark, 1996. Timeless Healing. The Power <strong>and</strong> Biology <strong>of</strong> Belief. London: Simon <strong>and</strong><br />
Schuster.<br />
Bilsl<strong>and</strong>, D. <strong>and</strong> A. Strong, 1990. Allergic contact dermatitis from the essential oil <strong>of</strong> French Marigold (Tagetes<br />
patula) in an aromatherapist. Cont. Dermat., 23: 55–56.<br />
B<strong>of</strong>fa, M.J., et al., 1996. Celery soup causes severe phototoxicity during PUVA therapy. Br. J. Dermatol., 135:<br />
334.<br />
Brooker, D.J.R., et al., 1997. Single case evaluation <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy <strong>and</strong> massage on disturbed<br />
behaviour in severe dementia. Br. J. Clin. Psychol., 36: 287–296.<br />
Brunn, E.Z. <strong>and</strong> G. Epiney-Burgard, 1989. Women Mystics in Medieval Europe. New York: Paragon House.<br />
Buchbauer, G., et al., 1992. Passiflora <strong>and</strong> limeblossom: Motility effects after inhalation <strong>of</strong> the essential oils<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the main constituents in animal experiments. Arch. Pharm. (Weinheim), 325: 247–248.<br />
Buchbauer, G., et al., 1993a. Fragrance compounds <strong>and</strong> essential oils with sedative effects upon inhalation.<br />
J. Pharm. Sci., 82: 660–664.<br />
Buchbauer, G., et al., 1993b. Therapeutic properties <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> fragrances. In: Bioactive Volatile<br />
Compounds from Plants, R. Teranishi, et al., eds, pp. 159–165. Washington, DC: American Chemical<br />
Society.
578 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Buchbauer, G., et al., 1993c. New results in aromatherapy research. Paper presented at the 24th Int. Symp. on<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, Berlin.<br />
Buckle, J., 1993. Does it matter which lavender oil is used? Nurs. Times, 89: 32–35.<br />
Bunyan, N., 1998. Baby died after taking mint water for wind. Daily Telegraph, May 21.<br />
Burns, E. <strong>and</strong> C. Blaney, 1994. Using aromatherapy in childbirth. Nurs. Times, 90: 54–58.<br />
Burns, E., et al., 2000. An investigation into the use <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy in intrapartum midwifery practice. J. Alt.<br />
Compl. Med., 6: 141–147.<br />
Carson, C.F. <strong>and</strong> T.V. Riley, 1995. Toxicity <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca alternifolia or tea tree oil. J. Toxicol.<br />
Clin. Toxicol., 33: 193–194.<br />
Chang Y.-C., et al., 1997. Allergic contact dermatitis from oxidised d-limonene. Cont. Dermat., 37: 308–309.<br />
Chou, Y.J. <strong>and</strong> D.R. Dietrich, 1999. Toxicity <strong>of</strong> nitromusks in early life-stages <strong>of</strong> South African clawed frog,<br />
Xenopus laevis <strong>and</strong> zebra-fish, Danio rerio. Toxicol. Lett., 111: 17–25.<br />
Christian, M.S., et al., 1999. Developmental toxicity studies <strong>of</strong> four fragrances in rats. Toxicol. Lett., 111:<br />
169–174.<br />
Classen, C., et al., 1994. Aroma. London: Routledge.<br />
Cohen, B.M. <strong>and</strong> W.E. Dressler, 1982. Acute aromatics inhalation modifies the airways. Effects <strong>of</strong> the common<br />
cold. Respiration, 43: 285–293.<br />
Concise Oxford Dictionary, 1995. 9th Edition, Della Thompson, Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford.<br />
Cooke, B. <strong>and</strong> E. Ernst, 2000. Aromatherapy: A systematic review. Br. J. Gen. Pract., 50: 493–496.<br />
Corbin, A., 1986. The Foul <strong>and</strong> the Fragrant. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.<br />
Corner, J., et al., 1995. An evaluation <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> massage <strong>and</strong> essential oils on the well-being <strong>of</strong> cancer<br />
patients. Int. J. Palliat. Nurs., 1: 67–73.<br />
Cornwell, S. <strong>and</strong> A. Dale, 1995. Lavender oil <strong>and</strong> perineal repair. Mod. Midwifery, 5: 31–33.<br />
Cousins, N., 1979. Anatomy <strong>of</strong> an Illness. New York: WW Norton.<br />
Crawford, G.H., et al., 2004. Use <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy products <strong>and</strong> increased risk <strong>of</strong> h<strong>and</strong> dermatitis in massage<br />
therapists. Arch. Dermatol., 140: 991–996.<br />
Culpeper, N., 1653/1995. Culpeper’s Complete Herbal <strong>and</strong> The English Physician <strong>and</strong> Family Dispensatory.<br />
Facsimile: Wordsworth editions, 1995.<br />
Culpeper, N., 1826/1981. Culpeper’s Complete Herbal <strong>and</strong> English Physician. Facsimile: Pitman Press Ltd.,<br />
Bath, 1981.<br />
Dale, A. <strong>and</strong> S. Cornwell, 1994. The role <strong>of</strong> lavender oil in relieving perineal discomfort following childbirth:<br />
A blind r<strong>and</strong>omized clinical trial. J. Adv. Nurs., 19: 89–96.<br />
De Groot, A.C. <strong>and</strong> P.J. Frosch, 1997. Adverse reactions to fragrances. A clinical review. Cont. Dermat., 36:<br />
57–86.<br />
Deans, S.G., 2002. Antimicrobial properties <strong>of</strong> lavender volatile oil. In: Genus Lav<strong>and</strong>ula, Aromatic <strong>and</strong><br />
Medicinal Plants—Industrial Pr<strong>of</strong>iles, M. Lis-Balchin, ed. London: Taylor & Francis.<br />
Deans, S.G. <strong>and</strong> G. Ritchie, 1987. Antibacterial properties <strong>of</strong> plant essential oils. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 5:<br />
165–180.<br />
Dejeans, M. (Antoine de Hornot), 1764. TraitŽ des Odeurs. Paris: Nyon/Guillyn/Saugrain.<br />
Devereux, P., 1997. The Long Trip. New York: Penguin.<br />
Dhondt, W., et al., 1999. Pain threshold in patients with rheumatoid arthritis <strong>and</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> manual oscillations.<br />
Sc<strong>and</strong>. J. Rheumatol., 28: 88–93.<br />
Diego, M.A., et al., 1998. Aromatherapy positively affects mood, EEG patterns <strong>of</strong> alertness <strong>and</strong> math computations.<br />
Int. J. Neurosci., 96: 217–224.<br />
Dorman, H.J.D., et al., 1995a. Antioxidant-rich plant volatile oils: In vitro assessment <strong>of</strong> activity. Paper presented<br />
at the 26th Int. Symp. on <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, Hamburg, Germany, 10–13 September.<br />
Dorman, H.J.D., et al., 1995b. Evaluation in vitro <strong>of</strong> plant essential oils as natural antioxidants. J. Essent. Oil<br />
Res., 7: 645–651.<br />
Dunn, C., et al., 1995. Sensing an improvement: An experimental study to evaluate the use <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy,<br />
massage <strong>and</strong> periods <strong>of</strong> rest in an intensive care unit. J. Adv. Nurs., 21: 34–40.<br />
Elisabetsky, E., et al., 1995. Effects <strong>of</strong> linalool on glutamatergic system in the rat cerebral cortex. Neurochem.<br />
Res., 20: 461–465.<br />
Elisabetsky, E., et al., 1999. Anticonvulsant properties <strong>of</strong> linalool in glutamate-related seizure models.<br />
Phytomedicine, 6: 107–113.<br />
Ellis, A., 1960. The Essence <strong>of</strong> Beauty. London: Secker <strong>and</strong> Warburg.<br />
Engelstein, E., et al., 1992. Rowatinex for the treatment <strong>of</strong> ureterolithiasis. J. Urol., 98: 98–100.<br />
Ernst, E., 1994. Clinical effectiveness <strong>of</strong> massage—a critical review. Forsch Komplementärmed, 1: 226–232.
Aromatherapy with <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 579<br />
Ernst, E., 1998. Does post-exercise massage treatment reduce delayed onset muscle soreness? Br. J. Sports<br />
Med., 32: 212–214.<br />
Ernst, E., 1999a. Abdominal massage for chronic constipation: A systematic review <strong>of</strong> controlled clinical trials.<br />
Forsch Komplementärmed, 6: 149–151.<br />
Ernst, E., 1999b. Massage therapy for low back pain: A systematic review. J. Pain. Sympt. Manage., 17:<br />
56–69.<br />
Ernst, E., 2003a. Massage treatment for back pain. BMJ, 326: 562–563.<br />
Ernst, E., 2003b. The safety <strong>of</strong> massage therapy. Rheumatology, 42: 1101–1106.<br />
Ernst, E. <strong>and</strong> B.R. Cassileth, 1998. The prevalence <strong>of</strong> complementary/alternative medicine in cancer: A systematic<br />
review. Cancer, 83: 777–782.<br />
Ernst, E., et al., 2001. The Desktop Guide to Complementary <strong>and</strong> Alternative Medicine. Edinburgh: Mosby.<br />
Evans, B., 1995. An audit into the effects <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy massage <strong>and</strong> the cancer patient in palliative <strong>and</strong><br />
terminal care. Compl. Ther. Med., 3: 239–241.<br />
Falk-Filipsson, A., et al., 1993. d-Limonene exposure to humans by inhalation: Uptake, distribution, elimination,<br />
<strong>and</strong> effects on the pulmonary function. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, 38: 77–88.<br />
Fenaroli, G., 1997. <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> Flavour Ingredients, 3rd ed., Vol. 1. London: CRC Press.<br />
Ferley, J.P., et al., 1989. Prophylactic aromatherapy for supervening infections in patients with chronic bronchitis.<br />
Statistical evaluation conducted in clinics against a placebo. Phytother. Res., 3: 97–100.<br />
Festing, S., 1989. The Story <strong>of</strong> Lavender. Surrey: Heritage in Sutton Leisure.<br />
Fischer-Rizzi, S., 1990. Complete Aromatherapy <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong>. New York: Sterling Publishing.<br />
Forbes, R.J., Ed. 1955. Cosmetics <strong>and</strong> perfumes in antiquity. In: Studies in Ancient <strong>Technology</strong>, Vol. III. Leiden: EJ<br />
Brill.<br />
Ford, R.A., 1991. The toxicology <strong>and</strong> safety <strong>of</strong> fragrances. In: Perfumes, Art, <strong>Science</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technology</strong>, P.M.<br />
Muller <strong>and</strong> D. Lamparsky, eds, pp. 442–463. New York: Elsevier.<br />
Frosch, P.J., et al., 1999. Lyral¨ is an important sensitizer in patients sensitive to fragrances. Br. J. Dermatol.,<br />
141: 1076–1083.<br />
Fuchs, N., et al., 1997. Systemic absorption <strong>of</strong> topically applied carvone: Influence <strong>of</strong> massage technique.<br />
J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem., 48: 277–282.<br />
Furuhashi, A., et al., 1994. Effects <strong>of</strong> AETT-induced neuronal ceroid lip<strong>of</strong>uscinosis on learning ability in rats.<br />
Jpn. J. Psychiatry Neurol., 48: 645–653.<br />
Gattefossé, M., 1992. Rene-Maurice Gattefossé, The father <strong>of</strong> modern aromatherapy. Int. J. Aromather., 4: 18–20.<br />
Gattefossé, R.M., 1928. Formulaire du chimiste-Parfumeur et du Savonnier [Formulary <strong>of</strong> cosmetics]. Paris:<br />
Librairie des <strong>Science</strong>s.<br />
Gattefossé, R.M., 1937/1993. Gattefossé’s Aromatherapy, R. Tisser<strong>and</strong>, ed. Saffron Walden: CW Daniel Co.<br />
Gattefossé, R.M., 1952. Formulary <strong>of</strong> Perfumery <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cosmetology. London: Leonard Hill.<br />
Gatti, G. <strong>and</strong> R. Cajola, 1923a. L’Azione delle essenze sul systema nervoso. Riv Ital Della Essenze e Pr<strong>of</strong>umi,<br />
5: 133–135.<br />
Gatti, G. <strong>and</strong> R. Cajola, 1923b. L’Azione terapeutica degli olii essenziali. Riv Ital Della Essenze e Pr<strong>of</strong>umi, 5:<br />
30–33.<br />
Gatti, G. <strong>and</strong> R. Cajola, 1929. L’essenza di valeriana nella cura delle malattie nervose. Riv Ital Della Essenze<br />
e Pr<strong>of</strong>umi, 2: 260–262.<br />
Genders, R., 1972. A History <strong>of</strong> Scent. London: Hamish Hamilton.<br />
Goats, G.C., 1994. Massage—the scientific basis <strong>of</strong> an ancient art: Parts 1 <strong>and</strong> 2. Br. J. Sports Med. (UK), 28:<br />
149–152, 153–156.<br />
Gobel, H., et al., 1994. Effect <strong>of</strong> peppermint <strong>and</strong> eucalyptus oil preparations on neurophysiological <strong>and</strong> experimental<br />
algesimetric headache parameters. Cephalagia, 14: 228–234.<br />
Goldstone, L., 1999. From orthodox to complementary: The fall <strong>and</strong> rise <strong>of</strong> massage, with specific reference to<br />
orthopaedic <strong>and</strong> rheumatology nursing. J. Orthop. Nurs., 3: 152–159.<br />
Goldstone, L., 2000. Massage as an orthodox medical treatment, past <strong>and</strong> future. Compl. Ther. Nurs. Midwifery,<br />
6: 169–175.<br />
Graham, P.H., et al., 2003. Inhalation aromatherapy during radiotherapy: Results <strong>of</strong> a placebo-controlled<br />
double-blind r<strong>and</strong>omized trial. J. Clin. Oncol., 15: 2372–2376.<br />
Groom, N., 1992. The Perfume <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong>, 2nd ed. London: Chapman & Hall.<br />
Guba, R., 2000. Toxicity myths: The actual risks <strong>of</strong> essential oil use. Perf. Flav., 25: 10–28.<br />
Guin, J.D., 1982. History, manufacture <strong>and</strong> cutaneous reaction to perfumes. In: Principles <strong>of</strong> Cosmetics for the<br />
Dermatologist, P. Frost <strong>and</strong> S.W. Horwitz, eds. St. Louis: The CV Mosby Co.<br />
Guin, J.D., 1995. Practical Contact Dermatitis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
580 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Hadfield, N., 2001. The role <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy massage in reducing anxiety in patients with malignant brain<br />
tumours. Int. J. Palliat. Nurs., 7: 279–285.<br />
Hardy, M., et al., 1995. Replacement <strong>of</strong> drug treatment for insomnia by ambient odour. Lancet, 346: 701.<br />
Hastings, L., et al., 1991. Olfactory primary neurons as a route <strong>of</strong> entry for toxic agents into the CNS.<br />
Neurotoxicology, 12: 707–714.<br />
Hay, I.C., et al., 1998. R<strong>and</strong>omized trial <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy. Successful treatment for Alopecia areata. Arch.<br />
Dermatol., 134: 1349–1352.<br />
Healey, M.A. <strong>and</strong> M. Aslam, 1996. Aromatherapy. In: Trease & Evans’ Pharmacognosy, W.C. Evans, ed., 14th<br />
ed. London: WB Saunders.<br />
Hendriks, S.A., et al., 1999. Allergic contact dermatitis from the fragrance ingredient Lyral¨ in underarm<br />
deodorant. Cont. Dermat., 41: 119.<br />
Hirsch, A., 1998. Sensational Sex: The Secret to Using Aroma for Arousal. Boston, MA: Element.<br />
Holmes, C., et al., 2002. Lavender oil as a treatment for agitated behaviour in severe dementia: A placebo controlled<br />
study. Int J. Geriatr. Psychiatry, 17: 305–308.<br />
Horowitz, D.A., 2000. Judgement (pursuant to stipulation). National Council against Health Fraud, Inc,<br />
v. Aroma Vera, Inc, et al. Superior Court No. BC183903, October 11.<br />
Jager, W., et al., 1992. Percutaneous absorption <strong>of</strong> lavender oil from a massage oil. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem., 43:<br />
49–54.<br />
Jager, W., et al., 1996. Pharmokinetic studies <strong>of</strong> the fragrance compound 1,8-cineole in humans during inhalation.<br />
Chem. Senses, 21: 477–480.<br />
Janson, T., 1997. Mundo Maya. Guatemala: Editorial Artemis Edinter.<br />
Johansen, J.D., et al., 1998. Allergens in combination have a synergistic effect on the elicitation response:<br />
A study <strong>of</strong> fragrance-sensitized individuals. Br. J. Dermatol., 139: 264–270.<br />
Johansen, J.D., et al., 2000. Rash related to use <strong>of</strong> scented products. A questionnaire study in the Danish population.<br />
Is the problem increasing? Cont. Dermat., 42: 222–226.<br />
Kafferlein, H.U., et al., 1998. Musk xylene: Analysis, occurrence, kinetics <strong>and</strong> toxicology. Crit. Rev. Toxicol,<br />
28: 431–476.<br />
Karamat, R., et al., 1992. Excitatory <strong>and</strong> sedative effects <strong>of</strong> essential oils on human reaction time performance.<br />
Chem. Senses, 17: 847.<br />
Karlberg, A.-T. <strong>and</strong> A. Dooms-Goossens, 1997. Contact allergy to oxidised d-limonene among dermatitis<br />
patients. Cont. Dermat., 36: 201–206.<br />
Katona, M. <strong>and</strong> K. Egyud, 2001. [Increased sensitivity to balsams <strong>and</strong> fragrances among our patients.] Orv.<br />
Hetil., 142: 465–466.<br />
Keane, F.M., et al., 2000. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis in two aromatherapists. Cont. Dermat., 43:<br />
49–51.<br />
Kennedy, D.O., et al., 2002. Modulation <strong>of</strong> mood <strong>and</strong> cognitive performance following acute administration <strong>of</strong><br />
Melissa <strong>of</strong>ficinalis (lemon balm. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 72: 953–964.<br />
Kilst<strong>of</strong>f, K. <strong>and</strong> L. Chenoweth, 1998. New approaches to health <strong>and</strong> well-being for dementia day-care clients,<br />
family carers <strong>and</strong> day-care staff. Int. J. Nurs. Pract., 4: 70–83.<br />
Kirk-Smith, M., 1996a. Clinical evaluation: Deciding what questions to ask. Nurs. Times, 92: 34–35.<br />
Kite, S.M., et al., 1998. Development <strong>of</strong> an aromatherapy service at a Cancer Centre. Palliat. Med., 12:<br />
171–180.<br />
Klarmann, E.G., 1958. Perfume dermatitis. Ann. Allergy, 16: 425–434.<br />
Klemm, W.R., et al., 1992. Topographical EEG maps <strong>of</strong> human responses to odors. Chem. Senses, 17:<br />
347–361.<br />
Knasko, S.C., 1992. Ambient odours effect on creativity, mood <strong>and</strong> perceived health. Chem. Senses, 17:<br />
27–35.<br />
Knasko, S.C., 1993. Performance, mood <strong>and</strong> health during exposure to intermittent odours. Arch. Environ.<br />
Health, 48: 3058.<br />
Knasko, S.C., et al., 1990. Emotional state, physical well-being <strong>and</strong> performance in the presence <strong>of</strong> feigned<br />
ambient odour. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 20: 1345–1347.<br />
Knight, T.E. <strong>and</strong> B.M. Hausen 1994. Melaleuca oil (tea tree oil) dermatitis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 30:<br />
423–427.<br />
Kohl, L., et al., 2002. Allergic contact dermatitis from cosmetics: Retrospective analysis <strong>of</strong> 819 patch-tested<br />
patients. Dermatology, 204: 334–337.<br />
Kohn, M., 1999. Complementary therapies in cancer care. Macmillan Cancer Relief Report.<br />
Kovar, K.A., et al., 1987. Blood levels <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole <strong>and</strong> locomotor activity <strong>of</strong> mice after inhalation <strong>and</strong> oral<br />
administration <strong>of</strong> rosemary oil. Planta Med., 3: 315–318.
Aromatherapy with <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 581<br />
Kubota, M., et al., 1992. Odor <strong>and</strong> emotion-effects <strong>of</strong> essential oils on contingent negative variation. In: Proc.<br />
12th Int. Congr. on Flavours, Fragrances <strong>and</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, pp. 456–461. Vienna, Austria, October<br />
4–8.<br />
Labyak, S.E. <strong>and</strong> B.L. Metzger, 1997. The effects <strong>of</strong> effleurage backrub on the physiological components <strong>of</strong><br />
relaxation: A meta-analysis. Nurs. Res., 46: 59–62.<br />
Laffan, G., 1992. Chronic respiratory infection. Int. J. Aromather., 4: 17.<br />
Larsen, W., 1998. A study <strong>of</strong> new fragrance mixtures. Am. J. Contact Dermat., 9: 202–206.<br />
Lawless, J., 1992. The Encyclopedia <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>. Shaftesbury: Element Books.<br />
Lawless, J., 1994. Aromatherapy <strong>and</strong> the Mind. London: Thorsons.<br />
Lis-Balchin, M. 1995. Aroma <strong>Science</strong>: The Chemistry <strong>and</strong> Bioactivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, Surrey: Amberwood<br />
Publishing Ltd.<br />
Lis-Balchin, M., 1997. <strong>Essential</strong> oils <strong>and</strong> ‘aromatherapy’: Their modern role in healing. J. R. Soc. Health, 117:<br />
324–329.<br />
Lis-Balchin, M., 1998a. Aromatherapy versus the internal intake <strong>of</strong> odours. NORA Newsletter, 3: 17.<br />
Lis-Balchin, M., 1998b. Aromatherapy for pain relief. Pain Concern Summer, 12–15. (Now available as a pamphlet<br />
from the organisation.)<br />
Lis-Balchin, M., 2006. Aromatherapy <strong>Science</strong>. London: Pharmaceutical Press.<br />
Lis-Balchin, M., ed., 2002a. Geranium <strong>and</strong> Pelargonium Genera Geranium <strong>and</strong> Pelargonium: Medicinal <strong>and</strong><br />
Aromatic Plants—Industrial Pr<strong>of</strong>iles. London: Taylor & Francis.<br />
Lis-Balchin, M., ed., 2002b. Genus Lav<strong>and</strong>ula: Medicinal <strong>and</strong> Aromatic Plants—Industrial Pr<strong>of</strong>iles. London:<br />
Taylor & Francis.<br />
Lis-Balchin, M., S. Hart, S.G. Deans, <strong>and</strong> E. Eaglesham, 1996. Comparison <strong>of</strong> the pharmacological <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial<br />
action <strong>of</strong> commercial plant essential oils. Journal <strong>of</strong> Herbs, Spices <strong>and</strong> Medicinal Plants, 4:<br />
69–86.<br />
Lis-Balchin, M., et al., 1996. Bioactivity <strong>of</strong> commercial geranium oil from different sources. J. Essent. Oil Res.,<br />
8: 281–290.<br />
Lis-Balchin, M., et al., 1998. Relationship between the bioactivity <strong>and</strong> chemical composition <strong>of</strong> commercial<br />
plant essential oils. Flav. Fragr. J., 13: 98–104.<br />
Lis-Balchin, M. <strong>and</strong> S. Hart, 1997. The effect <strong>of</strong> essential oils on the uterus compared to that on other muscles.<br />
In: Proc. 27th Int. Symp. <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, Ch, Franz A. Mathé, <strong>and</strong> G. Buchbauer, eds. Vienna, Austria,<br />
pp. 29–32, September 8–11, 1996. Carol Stream, IL: Allured Publishing.<br />
Lis-Balchin, M. <strong>and</strong> S. Hart, 1997c. A preliminary study <strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> essential oils on skeletal <strong>and</strong> smooth<br />
muscles in vitro. J. Ethnopharmacol., 58: 183–187.<br />
Loret, V., 1887. Le kyphi, parfum sacre des anciens egyptiens. J. Asiatique, 10: 76–132.<br />
MacMahon, S. <strong>and</strong> S. Kermode 1998. A clinical trial <strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy on motivational behaviour<br />
in a dementia care setting using a single subject design. Aust. J. Holist. Nurs., 5: 47–49.<br />
Manley, C.H., 1993. Psychophysiological effect <strong>of</strong> odor. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 33: 57–62.<br />
Manniche, L., 1989. An Ancient Egyptian Herbal. London: British Museum Publications.<br />
Manniche, L., 1999. Sacred Luxuries. Fragrance, Aromatherapy <strong>and</strong> Cosmetics in Ancient Egypt. London:<br />
Opus Publishing.<br />
Maury, M., 1989. Marquerite Maury’s Guide to Aromatherapy. Saffron Walden: CW Daniel Co.<br />
May, B., et al., 1996. Efficacy <strong>of</strong> a fixed peppermint oil/caraway combination in non-ulcer dyspepsia.<br />
Arzneimettelforsch, 146: 1149–1153.<br />
Millenson, J.R., 1995. Mind Matters: Psychological Medicine in Holistic Practice. Seattle, WA: Eastl<strong>and</strong><br />
Press.<br />
Millqvist, E. <strong>and</strong> O. Lowhagen 1996. Placebo-controlled challenges with perfume in patients with asthma-like<br />
symptoms. Allergy, 51: 434–439.<br />
Morris, N., et al., 1995. Anxiety reduction by aromatherapy: Anxiolytic effects <strong>of</strong> inhalation <strong>of</strong> geranium <strong>and</strong><br />
rosemary. Int. J. Aromather., 7: 33–39.<br />
Munro, I.C., et al., 1996. Correlation <strong>of</strong> structural class with no-observed-effect levels: A proposal for establishing<br />
a threshold <strong>of</strong> concern. Food Cosmet. Toxicol., 34: 829–867.<br />
Müller, J., et al., 1984. The H&R Book <strong>of</strong> Perfume. London: Johnson Publications.<br />
Nelson, N.J., 1997. Scents or nonsense: Aromatherapy’s benefits still subject to debate. J. Natl. Cancer Inst.,<br />
89: 1334–1336.<br />
Nunn, J.F., 1997. Ancient Egyptian Medicine. London: British Museum Press.<br />
Ollevant, N.A., et al., 1999. How big is a drop? A volumetric assay <strong>of</strong> essential oils. J. Clin. Nurs., 8:<br />
299–304.<br />
Perry, E.K., et al., 1998. Medicinal plants <strong>and</strong> Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alt. Compl. Med., 4: 419–428.
582 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Perry, E.K., et al., 1999. Medicinal plants <strong>and</strong> Alzheimer’s disease: From ethnobotany to phytotherapy.<br />
J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 51: 527–534.<br />
Piesse, S.G.W., 1855. The Art <strong>of</strong> Perfumery. London: Longman, Brown, Green.<br />
Pinch, G., 1994. Magic in Ancient Egypt. London: British Museum Press.<br />
Price, S., 1983. Practical Aromatherapy. Welling-borough: Thorsons.<br />
Price, S., 1993. Aromatherapy Workbook. London: Thorsons.<br />
Price, S. <strong>and</strong> L. Price, 1999. Aromatherapy for Health Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, 2nd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone.<br />
Pénoel, D., 1991a. Médecine Aromatique, Médecine Planétaire. Limoges: Roger Jollois.<br />
Pénoel, D., 1991b. Cf. les travaux de J.-A. Giralt-Gonzalez. Limoges: Roger Jollois.<br />
Pénoel, D., 1998. A Natural Home Health Care using <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>. Hurricane, UT: <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Science</strong><br />
Publishing.<br />
Rastogi, S.C., et al., 1999. Contents <strong>of</strong> fragrance allergens in children’s cosmetics <strong>and</strong> cosmetic-toys. Cont.<br />
Dermat., 41: 84–88.<br />
Redd, W. <strong>and</strong> S. Manne, 1991. Fragrance reduces patient anxiety during stressful medical procedures. Focus on<br />
Fragrance Summer, 1: 1.<br />
Riedel, J., et al., 1999. Haemoglobin binding <strong>of</strong> a musk xylene metabolite in man. Xenobiotica, 29: 573–582.<br />
Rimmel, E., 1865. The Book <strong>of</strong> Perfumes. London: Chapman & Hall.<br />
Rippon M<strong>and</strong>y, 1993. Infertility <strong>and</strong> stress. Int. J. Aromather., 5: 33.<br />
Romaguera, C. <strong>and</strong> J. Vilplana, 2000. Occupational contact dermatitis from ylang-ylang oil. Cont. Dermat., 43: 251.<br />
Rose, J.E. <strong>and</strong> F.M. Behm, 1994. Inhalation <strong>of</strong> vapour from black pepper extract reduces smoking withdrawal<br />
symptoms. Drug Alcohol Depend., 34: 225–229.<br />
Sanchez-Perez, J. <strong>and</strong> A. Garcia-Diez, 1999. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from eugenol, oil <strong>of</strong><br />
cinnamon <strong>and</strong> oil <strong>of</strong> cloves in a physiotherapist. Cont. Dermat., 41: 346–347.<br />
Schaller, M. <strong>and</strong> H.C. Korting, 1995. Allergic airborne contact dermatitis from essential oils used in aromatherapy.<br />
Clin. Exp. Dermatol., 20: 143–145.<br />
Scheinman, P.L., 1996. Allergic contact dermatitis to fragrance. Am. J. Cont. Dermatol., 7: 65–76.<br />
Schnaubelt, K., 1999. Medical Aromatherapy—Healing with <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>. Berkeley, CA: Frog Ltd.<br />
Schumann Antelme, R. <strong>and</strong> S. Rossini, 2001. Sacred Sexuality in Ancient Egypt. Vermont: Inner Traditions<br />
International.<br />
Sharma, J.N., et al., 1994. Suppressive effects <strong>of</strong> eugenol <strong>and</strong> ginger oil on arthritic rats. Pharmacology, 49:<br />
314–318.<br />
Shim, C. <strong>and</strong> M.H. Williams Jr., 1986. Effect <strong>of</strong> odors in asthma. Am. J. Med., 80: 18–22.<br />
Skoeld, M., et al., 2002a. Sensitization studies on the fragrance chemical linalool, with respect to autooxidation.<br />
Abstract. Cont. Dermat., 46(Suppl 4): 20.<br />
Skoeld, M., et al., 2002b. Studies on the auto-oxidation <strong>and</strong> sensitizing capacity <strong>of</strong> the fragrance chemical<br />
linalool, identifying a linalool hydroperoxide. Cont. Dermat., 46: 267–272.<br />
Smallwood, J., et al., 2001. Aromatherapy <strong>and</strong> behaviour disturbances in dementia: A r<strong>and</strong>omized controlled<br />
trial. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry, 16: 1010–1013.<br />
Snow, A.L., et al., 2004. A controlled trial <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy for agitation in nursing home patients with dementia.<br />
J. Alt. Compl. Med., 10: 431–437.<br />
Soden, K., et al., 2004. A r<strong>and</strong>omized controlled trial <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy massage in a hospice setting. Palliat.<br />
Med., 18: 87–92.<br />
Somerville, K.W., et al., 1984. Delayed release peppermint oil capsules (Colpermin) for the spastic colon<br />
syndrome—a pharmaco-kinetic study. Br. J. Clin. Pharm., 18: 638–640.<br />
Somerville, K.W., et al., 1985. Stones in the common bile duct: Experience with medical dissolution therapy.<br />
Postgrad. Med. J., 61: 313–316.<br />
Southwell, I.A., 1997. Skin irritancy <strong>of</strong> tea tree oil. J. Essent. Oil Res., 9: 47–52.<br />
Spencer, P.S., et al., 1979. Neurotoxic fragrance produces ceroid <strong>and</strong> myelin disease. <strong>Science</strong>, 204: 633–635.<br />
Spencer, P.S., et al., 1984. Neurotoxic properties <strong>of</strong> musk ambrette. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 75: 571–575.<br />
Steinberg, P., et al., 1999. Acute hepatotoxicity <strong>of</strong> the polycyclic musk 7-acetyl-1,1,3,4,4,6-hexamethyl1,2,3,4-<br />
tetrahydronaphthaline (AHTN. Toxicol. Lett., 111: 151–160.<br />
Stevenson, C., 1994. The psychophysiological effects <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy massage following cardiac surgery.<br />
Comp. Ther. Med., 2: 27–35.<br />
Sugiura, M., et al., 2000. Results <strong>of</strong> patch testing with lavender oil in Japan. Cont. Dermat., 43: 157–160.<br />
Tate, S, 1997. Peppermint oil: A treatment for postoperative nausea. J. Adv. Nurs., 26: 543–549.<br />
Tisser<strong>and</strong>, R., 1977. The Art <strong>of</strong> Aromatherapy. Saffron Walden: CW Daniel Co.<br />
Tisser<strong>and</strong>, R. <strong>and</strong> T. Balacs 1995. <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Safety—A Guide for Health Care Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals. Edinburgh:<br />
Churchill Livingstone.
Aromatherapy with <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 583<br />
Tobyn, G., 1997. Culpeper’s Medicine: A Practice <strong>of</strong> Holistic Medicine. Shaftesbury: Element Books.<br />
Tong, M.M., et al., 1992. Tea tree oil in the treatment <strong>of</strong> tinea pedis. Aust. J. Dermatol., 33: 145–149.<br />
Torii, S., et al., 1988. Contingent negative variation <strong>and</strong> the psychological effects <strong>of</strong> odor. In: Perfumery: The<br />
Psychology <strong>and</strong> Biology <strong>of</strong> Fragrance, S. Toller <strong>and</strong> G.H. Dodd, eds. New York: Chapman & Hall.<br />
Unterman, A., 1991. Dictionary <strong>of</strong> Jewish Lore & Legend. London: Thames <strong>and</strong> Hudson.<br />
Valnet, J., 1982. The Practice <strong>of</strong> Aromatherapy. Saffron Walden: CW Daniel Co.<br />
Van Toller, S. <strong>and</strong> G.H. Dodd 1991. Perfumery: The Psychology <strong>and</strong> Biology <strong>of</strong> Fragrance. New York: Chapman<br />
& Hall.<br />
Van Toller, S. et al., 1993. An analysis <strong>of</strong> spontaneous human cortical EEG activity to odours. Chem. Senses,<br />
18: 1–16.<br />
Veien, N.K., et al., 1985. Reduction <strong>of</strong> intake <strong>of</strong> balsams in patients sensitive to balsam <strong>of</strong> Peru. Cont. Dermat.,<br />
12: 270–273.<br />
Vickers, A., 1996. Massage <strong>and</strong> Aromatherapy. London: Chapman & Hall.<br />
Vilaplana, J. <strong>and</strong> C. Romaguera 2002. Contact dermatitis from the essential oil <strong>of</strong> tangerine in fragrance. Cont.<br />
Dermat., 46: 108.<br />
von Burg, R., 1995. Toxicology update. J. Appl. Toxicol., 15: 495–499.<br />
Wake, G., et al., 2000. CNS acetylcholine receptor activity in European medicinal plants traditionally used to<br />
improve failing memory. J. Ethnopharmacology, 69: 105–114.<br />
Warren, C. <strong>and</strong> S. Warrenburg, 1993. Mood benefits <strong>of</strong> fragrance. Perf. Flav., 18: 9–16.<br />
Weibel, H. et al., 1989. Cross-sensitization patterns in guinea pigs between cinnamaldehyde, cinnamyl alcohol<br />
<strong>and</strong> cinnamic acid. Acta Dermatol. Venereol., 69: 302–307.<br />
Weil, A., 1983. Health <strong>and</strong> Healing. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.<br />
Which?, 2001. <strong>Essential</strong> oils. Health Which? February, 17–19.<br />
Wiebe, E., 2000. A r<strong>and</strong>omized trial <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy to reduce anxiety before abortion. Eff. Clin. Pract., 3:<br />
166–169.<br />
Wilcock, A., et al., 2004. Does aromatherapy massage benefit patients with cancer attending a specialist palliative<br />
care day centre? Palliat. Med., 18: 287–290.<br />
Wilkinson, S., 1995. Aromatherapy <strong>and</strong> massage in palliative care. Int. J. Palliat. Care, 1: 21–30.<br />
Wilkinson, S., et al., 1999. An evaluation <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy massage in palliative care. Palliat. Med., 13:<br />
409–417.<br />
Wilkinson, S.M., 2003. Evaluating the efficacy <strong>of</strong> massage in cancer care. BMJ, 326: 562–563.<br />
Wilson, F.P., 1925. The Plague Pamphlets <strong>of</strong> Thomas Dekker. Oxford: Clarendon Press.<br />
Worwood, V., 1991. The Fragrant Pharmacy. London: Bantam Books.<br />
Worwood, V., 1996. The Fragrant Mind. London: Doubleday.<br />
Worwood, V., 1998. The Fragrant Heavens. The Spiritual Dimension <strong>of</strong> Fragrance <strong>and</strong> Aromatherapy. Novato,<br />
CA: New World Library.<br />
Youdim, K.A. <strong>and</strong> S.G. Deans, 2000. Effect <strong>of</strong> thyme oil <strong>and</strong> thymol dietary supplementation on the antioxidant<br />
status <strong>and</strong> fatty acid composition <strong>of</strong> the ageing rat brain. Br. J. Nutr., 83: 87–93.<br />
Young, A.R., et al., 1990. Phototumorigenesis studies <strong>of</strong> 5-methoxypsoralen in bergamot oil: Evaluation <strong>and</strong><br />
modification <strong>of</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> human use in an albino mouse skin model. J. Phytochem. Photobiol., 7:<br />
231–250.<br />
Zarno, V., 1994. C<strong>and</strong>idiasis: A holistic view. Int. J. Aromather., 6(2): 20–23.
14<br />
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong><br />
Monoterpenoids by<br />
Microorganisms, Insects,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Mammals<br />
Yoshiaki Noma <strong>and</strong> Yoshinori Asakawa<br />
CONTENTS<br />
14.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 586<br />
14.2 Metabolic Pathways <strong>of</strong> Acyclic Monoterpenoids ............................................................ 587<br />
14.2.1 Acyclic Monoterpene Hydrocarbons ................................................................. 587<br />
14.2.1.1 Myrcene ............................................................................................ 587<br />
14.2.1.2 Citronellene ....................................................................................... 588<br />
14.2.2 Acyclic Monoterpene Alcohols <strong>and</strong> Aldehydes ................................................. 588<br />
14.2.2.1 Geraniol, Nerol, (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-Citronellol, Citral, <strong>and</strong><br />
(+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-Citronellal ..................................................................... 588<br />
14.2.2.2 Linalool <strong>and</strong> Linalyl Acetate ............................................................ 596<br />
14.2.2.3 Dihydromycenol ................................................................................ 602<br />
14.3 Metabolic Pathways <strong>of</strong> Cyclic Monoterpenoids ............................................................. 603<br />
14.3.1 Monocyclic Monoterpene Hydrocarbon ............................................................ 603<br />
14.3.1.1 Limonene .......................................................................................... 603<br />
14.3.1.2 Isolimonene ...................................................................................... 614<br />
14.3.1.3 p-Menthane ....................................................................................... 614<br />
14.3.1.4 1-p-Menthene .................................................................................... 614<br />
14.3.1.5 3-p-Menthene .................................................................................... 615<br />
14.3.1.6 α-Terpinene ....................................................................................... 616<br />
14.3.1.7 γ-Terpinene ........................................................................................ 616<br />
14.3.1.8 Terpinolene ....................................................................................... 616<br />
14.3.1.9 α-Phell<strong>and</strong>rene ................................................................................ 616<br />
14.3.1.10 p-Cymene ......................................................................................... 616<br />
14.3.2 Monocyclic Monoterpene Aldehyde .................................................................. 619<br />
14.3.2.1 Perillaldehyde ................................................................................... 619<br />
14.3.2.2 Phell<strong>and</strong>ral <strong>and</strong> 1,2-Dihydrophell<strong>and</strong>ral .......................................... 620<br />
14.3.2.3 Cuminaldehyde ................................................................................ 621<br />
14.3.3 Monocyclic Monoterpene Alcohol .................................................................... 621<br />
14.3.3.1 Menthol ............................................................................................. 621<br />
14.3.3.2 Neomenthol ...................................................................................... 627<br />
14.3.3.3 (+)-Isomenthol .................................................................................. 627<br />
14.3.3.4 Isopulegol ......................................................................................... 627<br />
585
586 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
14.3.3.5 α-Terpineol ....................................................................................... 629<br />
14.3.3.6 (-)-Terpinen-4-ol .............................................................................. 631<br />
14.3.3.7 Thymol <strong>and</strong> Thymol Methyl Ether ................................................... 631<br />
14.3.3.8 Carvacrol <strong>and</strong> Carvacrol Methyl Ether ............................................ 633<br />
14.3.3.9 Carveol ............................................................................................. 634<br />
14.3.3.10 Dihydrocarveol ................................................................................ 639<br />
14.3.3.11 Piperitenol ........................................................................................ 643<br />
14.3.3.12 Isopiperitenol ................................................................................... 643<br />
14.3.3.13 Perillyl Alcohol ................................................................................. 645<br />
14.3.3.14 Carvomenthol ................................................................................... 646<br />
14.3.4 Monocyclic Monoterpene Ketone ...................................................................... 648<br />
14.3.4.1 a, b-Unsaturated Ketone .................................................................. 648<br />
14.3.4.2 Saturated Ketone ............................................................................... 667<br />
14.3.4.3 Cyclic Monoterpene Epoxide ........................................................... 670<br />
14.4 Metabolic Pathways <strong>of</strong> Bicyclic Monoterpenoids ........................................................... 677<br />
14.4.1 Bicyclic Monoterpene ........................................................................................ 677<br />
14.4.1.1 a-Pinene ........................................................................................... 677<br />
14.4.1.2 b-Pinene ............................................................................................ 680<br />
14.4.1.3 (±)-Camphene .................................................................................. 686<br />
14.4.1.4 3-Carene <strong>and</strong> Carane ........................................................................ 688<br />
14.4.2 Bicyclic Monoterpene Aldehyde ........................................................................ 689<br />
14.4.2.1 Myrtenal <strong>and</strong> Myrtanal ..................................................................... 689<br />
14.4.3 Bicyclic Monoterpene Alcohol .......................................................................... 690<br />
14.4.3.1 Myrtenol ........................................................................................... 690<br />
14.4.3.2 Myrtanol ........................................................................................... 691<br />
14.4.3.3 Pinocarveol ....................................................................................... 691<br />
14.4.3.4 Pinane-2,3-diol ................................................................................. 692<br />
14.4.3.5 Isopinocampheol (3-Pinanol) ............................................................ 693<br />
14.4.3.6 Borneol <strong>and</strong> Isoborneol ................................................................... 696<br />
14.4.3.7 Fenchol <strong>and</strong> Fenchyl Acetate ............................................................ 697<br />
14.4.3.8 Verbenol ............................................................................................ 699<br />
14.4.3.9 Nopol <strong>and</strong> Nopol Benzyl Ether ......................................................... 699<br />
14.4.4 Bicyclic Monoterpene Ketones .......................................................................... 700<br />
14.4.4.1 a-, b-Unsaturated Ketone ................................................................ 700<br />
14.4.4.2 Saturated Ketone ............................................................................... 701<br />
14.5 Summary ......................................................................................................................... 709<br />
14.5.1 Metabolic Pathways <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms ........................... 709<br />
14.5.2 Microbial Transformation <strong>of</strong> Terpenoids as Unit Reaction ............................... 720<br />
References .................................................................................................................................. 726<br />
14.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
A large number <strong>of</strong> monoterpenoids have been detected in or isolated from essential oils <strong>and</strong> solvent<br />
extracts <strong>of</strong> fungi, algae, liverworts, <strong>and</strong> higher plants, but the presence <strong>of</strong> monoterpenoids in fern is<br />
negligible. Vegetables, fruits, <strong>and</strong> spices contain monoterpenoids; however, their fate in human <strong>and</strong><br />
other animal bodies has not yet been fully investigated systematically. The recent development <strong>of</strong><br />
analytical instruments makes it easy to analyze the chemical structures <strong>of</strong> very minor components,<br />
<strong>and</strong> the essential oil chemistry field has dramatically developed.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 587<br />
Since monoterpenoids, in general, show characteristic odor <strong>and</strong> taste, they have been used as<br />
cosmetic materials; food additives; <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten for insecticides, insect repellents, <strong>and</strong> attractant drugs.<br />
In order to obtain much more functionalized substances from monoterpenoids, various chemical<br />
reactions <strong>and</strong> microbial transformations <strong>of</strong> commercially available <strong>and</strong> cheap synthetic monoterpenoids<br />
have been carried out. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, insect larva <strong>and</strong> mammals have been used for direct<br />
biotransformations <strong>of</strong> monoterpenoids to study their fate <strong>and</strong> safety or toxicity in their bodies.<br />
The biotransformation <strong>of</strong> a-pinene (4) by using the black fungus Aspergillus niger was reported<br />
by Bhattacharyya et al. (1960) half a century ago. During that period, many scientists studied the<br />
biotransformation <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> monoterpenoids by using various kinds <strong>of</strong> bacteria, fungi, insects,<br />
mammals, <strong>and</strong> cultured cells <strong>of</strong> higher plants. In this chapter, the microbial transformation <strong>of</strong><br />
monoterpenoids using bacteria <strong>and</strong> fungi is discussed. Furthermore, the biotransformation by using<br />
insect larva, mammals, microalgae, as well as suspended culture cells <strong>of</strong> higher plants is also summarized.<br />
In addition, several biological activities <strong>of</strong> biotransformed products are also represented.<br />
At the end <strong>of</strong> this chapter, the metabolite pathways <strong>of</strong> representative monoterpenoids for further<br />
development on biological transformation <strong>of</strong> monoterpenoids are demonstrated.<br />
14.2 METABOLIC PATHWAYS OF ACYCLIC MONOTERPENOIDS<br />
14.2.1 ACYCLIC MONOTERPENE HYDROCARBONS<br />
14.2.1.1 Myrcene<br />
The microbial biotransformation <strong>of</strong> myrcene (302) was described with Diplodia gossypina ATCC<br />
10936 (Abraham et al., 1985). The main reactions were hydroxylation, as shown in Figure 14.1. On<br />
oxidation, myrcene (302) gave the diol (303) (yield up to 60%) <strong>and</strong> also a side-product (304) that<br />
possesses one carbon atom less than the parent compound, in yields <strong>of</strong> 1–2%.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the publications dealing with the bioconversion <strong>of</strong> myrcene (Busmann <strong>and</strong> Berger,<br />
1994) described its transformation to a variety <strong>of</strong> oxygenated metabolites, with Ganoderma<br />
applanatum, Pleurotus fl abellatus, <strong>and</strong> Pleurotus sajor-caju possessing the highest transformation<br />
activities. One <strong>of</strong> the main metabolites was myrcenol (305) (2-methyl-6-methylene-7-octen-<br />
2-ol), which gives a fresh, flowery impression <strong>and</strong> dominates the sensory impact <strong>of</strong> the mixture<br />
(see Figure 14.1).<br />
D. gosssypina<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
G. applanatum<br />
Pleurotus sp.<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
303 304<br />
302<br />
OH<br />
305<br />
FIGURE 14.1 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> myrcene (302) by Diplodia gossypina (Abraham et al., 1985), Ganoderma<br />
applanatum, <strong>and</strong> Pleurotus sp. (Modified from Busmann, D. <strong>and</strong> R.G. Berger, 1994. J. Biotechol., 37: 39–43.)
588 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
302 307 308<br />
FIGURE 14.2 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> myrcene (302) by Spodoptera litura. (Modified from Miyazawa, M.<br />
et al., 1998. Proc. 42nd TEAC, pp. 123–125.)<br />
b-Myrcene (302) was converted by common cutworm larvae, Spodoptera litura, to give<br />
myrcene-3,(10)-glycol (308) via myrcene-3,(10)-epoxide (307) (Figure 14.2) (Miyazawa et al.,<br />
1998).<br />
14.2.1.2 Citronellene<br />
(-)-Citronellene (309) <strong>and</strong> (+)-citronellene (309¢) were biotransformed by the cutworm Spodoptera<br />
litura to give (3R)-3,7-dimethyl-6-octene-1,2-diol (310) <strong>and</strong> (3S)-3,7-dimethyl-6-octene-1,2-diol<br />
(310¢), respectively (Takeuchi <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 2005) (Figure 14.3).<br />
14.2.2 ACYCLIC MONOTERPENE ALCOHOLS AND ALDEHYDES<br />
14.2.2.1 Geraniol, Nerol, (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-Citronellol, Citral, <strong>and</strong> (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-Citronellal<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CHO<br />
CHO<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
258 (R)- (+) 258' (S)- (–) 261 (R)- (+) 261' (S)- (–) 262 (R)- (+) 262' (S)- (–)<br />
Citronellol<br />
Citronellal<br />
Citronellic acid<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CHO<br />
COOH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CHO<br />
COOH<br />
271<br />
Geraniol<br />
272<br />
Nerol<br />
276<br />
Geranial<br />
275<br />
Neral<br />
278<br />
Geranic acid<br />
277<br />
Neric acid<br />
275 & 276<br />
Citral<br />
The microbial degradation <strong>of</strong> the acyclic monoterpene alcohols citronellol (258), nerol (272), geraniol<br />
(271), citronellal (261), <strong>and</strong> citral (equal mixture <strong>of</strong> 275 <strong>and</strong> 276) was reported in the early part<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1960 (Seubert <strong>and</strong> Remberger, 1963; Seubert et al., 1963; Seubert <strong>and</strong> Fass, 1964a, 1964b).<br />
Pseudomonas citronellolis metabolized citronellol (258), citronellal (261), geraniol (271), <strong>and</strong><br />
geranic acid (278). The metabolism <strong>of</strong> these acyclic monoterpenes is initiated by the oxidation <strong>of</strong> the
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 589<br />
S. litura<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
309<br />
310<br />
S. litura<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
309'<br />
310'<br />
FIGURE 14.3 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-citronellene (309) <strong>and</strong> (+)-citronellene (309¢) by Spodoptera litura.<br />
(Modified from Takeuchi, H. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2005. Proc. 49th TEAC, pp. 426–427.)<br />
primary alcohols group to the carboxyl group, followed by the carboxylation <strong>of</strong> the C-10 methyl<br />
group (b-methyl) by a biotin-dependent carboxylase (Seubert <strong>and</strong> Remberger, 1963). The carboxymethyl<br />
group is eliminated at a later stage as acetic acid. Further degradation follows the b-oxidation<br />
pattern. The details <strong>of</strong> the pathway are shown in Figure 14.4 (Seubert <strong>and</strong> Fass, 1964a).<br />
CH 2<br />
OH<br />
CHO<br />
COOH<br />
258<br />
261<br />
262<br />
CH 2<br />
COOH<br />
CH 2<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
CH 2<br />
OH<br />
CHO<br />
COOH<br />
CO 2<br />
COOH<br />
H 2<br />
O<br />
COOH<br />
272<br />
275<br />
277 281<br />
282<br />
CH 2<br />
OH<br />
CHO<br />
COOH<br />
CH 3<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
β-Oxidation<br />
COOH<br />
271<br />
276<br />
278<br />
FIGURE 14.4 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> citronellol (258), nerol (272), <strong>and</strong> geraniol (271) by Pseudomonas<br />
citronellolis. [Modified from Madyastha, K.M. 1984. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Chem. Sci.), 93: 677–686.]<br />
283
590 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
The microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> citronellal (261) <strong>and</strong> citral (275 <strong>and</strong> 276) was reported by way<br />
<strong>of</strong> Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Joglekar <strong>and</strong> Dhavlikar, 1969). This bacterium, capable <strong>of</strong> utilizing<br />
citronellal (261) or citral (275 <strong>and</strong> 276) as the sole carbon <strong>and</strong> energy source, has been isolated<br />
from soil by the enrichment culture technique. It metabolized citronellal (261) to citronellic acid<br />
(262) (65%), citronellol (258) (0.6%), dihydrocitronellol (259) (0.6%), 3,7-dimethyl-1,7-octanediol<br />
(260) (1.7%), <strong>and</strong> menthol (137) (0.75%) (Figure 14.5). The metabolites <strong>of</strong> citral (275 <strong>and</strong> 276) were<br />
geranic acid (278) (62%), 1-hydroxy-3,7-dimethyl-6-octen-2-one (279) (0.75%), 6-methyl-5-<br />
heptenoic acid (280) (0.5%), <strong>and</strong> 3-methyl-2-butenoic acid (286) (1%) (Figure 14.5). In a similar<br />
way, Pseudomonas convexa converted citral (275 <strong>and</strong> 276) to geranic acid (278) (Hayashi et al.,<br />
1967). The biotransformation <strong>of</strong> citronellol (258) <strong>and</strong> geraniol (271) by Pseudomonas aeruginosa,<br />
Pseudomonas citronellolis, <strong>and</strong> Pseudomonas mendocina was also reported by another group<br />
(Cantwell et al., 1978).<br />
A research group in Czechoslovakia patented the cyclization <strong>of</strong> citronellal (261) with subsequent<br />
hydrogenation to menthol by Penicillium digitatum in 1952. Unfortunately the optical purities <strong>of</strong> the<br />
intermediates pulegol <strong>and</strong> isopulegol were not determined <strong>and</strong> presumably the resulting menthol<br />
was a mixture <strong>of</strong> enantiomers. Therefore, it cannot be excluded that this extremely interesting cyclization<br />
is the result <strong>of</strong> a reaction primarily catalyzed by the acidic fermentation conditions <strong>and</strong> only<br />
partially dependent on enzymatic reactions (Babcka et al., 1956) (Figure 14.6).<br />
Based on previous data (Madyastha et al., 1977; Rama <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya, 1977a), two pathways<br />
for the degradation <strong>of</strong> geraniol (271) were proposed by Madyastha (1984) (Figure 14.7). Pathway A<br />
involves an oxidative attack on the 2,3-double bond, resulting in the formation <strong>of</strong> an epoxide.<br />
Opening <strong>of</strong> the epoxide yields the 2,3-dihydroxygeraniol (292), which upon oxidation forms 2-oxo,<br />
3-hydroxygeraniol (293). The ketodiol (293) is then decomposed to 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one (294)<br />
by an oxidative process. Pathway B is initiated by the oxidation <strong>of</strong> the primary alcoholic group<br />
to geranic acid (278) <strong>and</strong> further metabolism follows the mechanism as proposed earlier for<br />
Pseudomonas citronellolis (Seubert <strong>and</strong> Remberger, 1963; Seubert et al., 1963). In the case <strong>of</strong> nerol<br />
(272), the Z-isomer <strong>of</strong> geraniol (271), degradative pathways analogous to pathways A <strong>and</strong> B as in<br />
geraniol (271) are observed. It was also noticed that Pseudomonas incognita metabolizes acetates<br />
<strong>of</strong> geraniol (271), nerol (272), <strong>and</strong> citronellol (258) much faster than their respective alcohols<br />
(Madyastha <strong>and</strong> Renganathan, 1983).<br />
CHO<br />
P. aeruginosa<br />
COOH CH 2<br />
OH CH 2<br />
OH CH 2<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
261 262<br />
258<br />
259<br />
260<br />
137<br />
COOH<br />
CHO<br />
CHO<br />
P. aeruginosa<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
CH 2<br />
OH<br />
HOOC<br />
275 276<br />
278<br />
279<br />
280<br />
286<br />
FIGURE 14.5 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> citronellal (261) <strong>and</strong> citral (275 <strong>and</strong> 276) by Pseudomonas aeruginosa.<br />
(Modified from Joglekar, S.S. <strong>and</strong> R.S. Dhavlikar, 1969. Appl. Microbiol., 18: 1084–1087.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 591<br />
OH<br />
CHO<br />
P. digitatum 263<br />
OH<br />
261<br />
OH<br />
137<br />
267<br />
FIGURE 14.6 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> citronellal to menthol by Penicillium digitatum. (Modified from<br />
Babcka, J. et al., 1956. Patent 56-9686b.)<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
CH 2<br />
OH CH 2<br />
OH CH 2<br />
OH<br />
A<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
271 292<br />
293<br />
B<br />
294<br />
CH 2<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
CO 2<br />
H 2<br />
O<br />
CH 2<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
CHO<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
CO 2<br />
β-Oxidation<br />
COOH<br />
H 2<br />
O<br />
COOH<br />
276 278 277<br />
281<br />
282<br />
CH 3<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
COOH<br />
FIGURE 14.7 Metabolism <strong>of</strong> geraniol (271) by Pseudomonas incognita. [Modified from Madyastha, K.M.<br />
1984. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Chem. Sci.), 93: 677–686.]<br />
Euglena gracilis Z converted citral (275 <strong>and</strong> 276, 56:44, peak area in GC) to geraniol (271) <strong>and</strong><br />
nerol (272), respectively, <strong>of</strong> which geraniol (271) was further transformed to (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-citronellol<br />
(258 <strong>and</strong> 258¢). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, when either geraniol (271) or nerol (272) was added, both compounds<br />
were isomerized to each other <strong>and</strong>, then, geraniol (271) was transformed to citronellol.<br />
These results showed that Euglena could distinguish between the stereoisomers geraniol (271) <strong>and</strong><br />
nerol (272) <strong>and</strong> hydrogenated geraniol (271) selectively. (+)-, (-)-, <strong>and</strong> (±)-Citronellal (261, 261¢, <strong>and</strong><br />
283
592 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
278<br />
262<br />
142a<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
CHO<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CHO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
276<br />
271<br />
258<br />
261<br />
142b<br />
CHO<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CHO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
275<br />
272<br />
258'<br />
261'<br />
142b'<br />
277<br />
COOH<br />
262'<br />
COOH<br />
FIGURE 14.8 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> citral (275 <strong>and</strong> 276) <strong>and</strong> its metabolites by Euglena gracilis Z.<br />
(Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1991a. Phytochem., 30: 1147–1151.)<br />
142a'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
261 <strong>and</strong> 261¢) were also transformed to the corresponding (+)-, (-)-, <strong>and</strong> (±)-citronellol (258, 258¢,<br />
<strong>and</strong> 258 <strong>and</strong> 258¢) as the major products <strong>and</strong> (+)-, (-)-, <strong>and</strong> (±)-citronellic acids (262, 262¢, <strong>and</strong> 262<br />
<strong>and</strong> 262¢) as the minor products, respectively (Noma et al., 1991a) (Figure 14.8).<br />
Dunaliella tertiolecta also reduced citral (geranial (276) <strong>and</strong> neral (275) = 56:44), (+)-, (-)-,<br />
<strong>and</strong> (±)-citronellal (261, 261¢, <strong>and</strong> 261 <strong>and</strong> 261¢) to the corresponding alcohols, namely, geraniol<br />
(271), nerol (272), (+)-, (-)-, <strong>and</strong> (±)-citronellol (258, 258¢, <strong>and</strong> 258 <strong>and</strong> 258¢) (Noma et al., 1991b,<br />
1992a).<br />
Citral (a mixture <strong>of</strong> geranial (276) <strong>and</strong> neral (275), 56:44 peak area in GC) is easily transformed<br />
to geraniol (271) <strong>and</strong> nerol (272), respectively, <strong>of</strong> which geraniol (32) is further hydrogenated to<br />
(+)-citronellol (258) <strong>and</strong> (-)-citronellol (258¢). Geranic acid (278) <strong>and</strong> neric acid (277) as the minor<br />
products are also formed from 276 <strong>and</strong> 275, respectively. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, when either 271 or<br />
272 is used as a substrate, both compounds are isomerized to each other, <strong>and</strong> then 271 is transformed<br />
to citronellol (258 or 258¢). These results showed the Euglena could distinguish between
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 593<br />
the stereoisomers, 271 <strong>and</strong> 272 <strong>and</strong> hydrogenated selectively 271 to citronellol (258 or 258¢). (+)-,<br />
(-)-, <strong>and</strong> (±)-Citronellal (261, 261¢, <strong>and</strong> equal mixture <strong>of</strong> 261 <strong>and</strong> 261¢) are also transformed to the<br />
corresponding citronellol <strong>and</strong> p-menthane-trans- <strong>and</strong> cis-3,8-diols (142a, b, a¢ <strong>and</strong> b¢) as the major<br />
products, which are well known as mosquito repellents <strong>and</strong> plant growth regulators (Nishimura<br />
et al., 1982; Nishimura <strong>and</strong> Noma, 1996), <strong>and</strong> (+)-, (-)-, <strong>and</strong> (±)-citronellic acids (262, 262¢, <strong>and</strong><br />
equal mixture <strong>of</strong> 262 <strong>and</strong> 262¢) as the minor products, respectively.<br />
Streptomyces ikutamanensis, Ya-2–1, also reduced citral (geranial (276) <strong>and</strong> neral (275) = 56:44),<br />
(+)-, (-)-, <strong>and</strong> (±)-citronellal (261, 261¢, <strong>and</strong> 261 <strong>and</strong> 261¢) to the corresponding alcohols, namely,<br />
geraniol (271), nerol (272), (+)-, (-)-, <strong>and</strong> (±)-citronellol (258, 258¢, 258 <strong>and</strong> 258¢). Compounds 271<br />
<strong>and</strong> 272 were isomerized to each other. Furthermore, terpene alcohols (258¢, 272, <strong>and</strong> 271) were<br />
epoxidized to give 6,7-epoxygeraniol (274), 6,7-epoxynerol (273), <strong>and</strong> 2,3-epoxycitronellol (268).<br />
On the other h<strong>and</strong>, (+)- <strong>and</strong> (±)-citronellol (258 <strong>and</strong> 258 <strong>and</strong> 258¢) were not converted at all (Noma<br />
et al., 1986) (Figure 14.9).<br />
CHO<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
276<br />
271<br />
274<br />
O<br />
CHO<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
O<br />
275<br />
272<br />
273<br />
CHO<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
261'<br />
258'<br />
268<br />
O<br />
CHO<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
261<br />
258<br />
CHO<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
261 & 261'<br />
258 & 258'<br />
FIGURE 14.9 Reduction <strong>of</strong> terpene aldehydes <strong>and</strong> epoxidation <strong>of</strong> terpene alcohols by Streptomyces<br />
ikutamanensis, Ya-2-1. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1986. Proc. 30th TEAC, pp. 204–206.)
594 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
A strain <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus niger, isolated from garden soil, was able to transform geraniol (271),<br />
citronellol (258 <strong>and</strong> 258¢), <strong>and</strong> linalool (206) to their respective 8-hydroxy derivatives. This reaction<br />
was called “w-hydroxylation” (Madyastha <strong>and</strong> Krishna Murthy, 1988a, 1988b).<br />
Fermentation <strong>of</strong> citronellyl acetate with Aspergillus niger resulted in the formation <strong>of</strong> a major<br />
metabolite, 8-hydroxycitronellol, accounting for approximately 60% <strong>of</strong> the total transformation products,<br />
accompanied by 38% citronellol. Fermentation <strong>of</strong> geranyl acetate with Aspergillus niger gave<br />
geraniol <strong>and</strong> 8-hydroxygeraniol (50% <strong>and</strong> 40%, respectively, <strong>of</strong> the total transformation products).<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the most important examples <strong>of</strong> fungal bioconversion <strong>of</strong> monoterpene alcohols is the<br />
biotransformation <strong>of</strong> citral by Botrytis cinerea. Botrytis cinerea is a fungus <strong>of</strong> high interest in winemaking<br />
(Rapp <strong>and</strong> M<strong>and</strong>ery, 1988). In an unripe state <strong>of</strong> maturation the infection <strong>of</strong> grapes by<br />
Botrytis cinerea is very much feared, as the grapes become mouldy (“gray rot”). With fully ripe<br />
grapes, however, the growth <strong>of</strong> Botrytis cinerea is desirable; the fungus is then called “noble rot”<br />
<strong>and</strong> the infected grapes deliver famous sweet wines, such as, for example, Sauternes <strong>of</strong> France or<br />
Tokay Aszu <strong>of</strong> Hungary (Brunerie et al., 1988).<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the first reports in this area dealt with the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> citronellol (258) by Botrytis<br />
cinerea (Brunerie et al., 1987a, 1988). The substrate was mainly metabolized by w-hydroxylation.<br />
The same group also investigated the bioconversion <strong>of</strong> citral (275 <strong>and</strong> 276) (Brunerie et al., 1987b). A<br />
comparison was made between grape must <strong>and</strong> a synthetic medium. When using grape must, no volatile<br />
bioconversion products were found. With a synthetic medium, biotransformation <strong>of</strong> citral (275 <strong>and</strong> 276)<br />
was observed yielding predominantly nerol (272) <strong>and</strong> geraniol (271) as reduction products <strong>and</strong> some<br />
w-hydroxylation products as minor compounds. Finally, the bioconversion <strong>of</strong> geraniol (271) <strong>and</strong> nerol<br />
(272) was described by the same group (Bock et al., 1988). When using grape must, a complete bioconversion<br />
<strong>of</strong> geraniol (271) was observed mainly yielding w-hydroxylation products.<br />
The most important metabolites from geraniol (271), nerol (272), <strong>and</strong> citronellol (258) are summarized<br />
in Figure 14.9. In the same year the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> these monoterpenes by Botrytis<br />
cinerea in model solutions was described by another group (Rapp <strong>and</strong> M<strong>and</strong>ery, 1988). Although<br />
the major metabolites found were w-hydroxylation compounds, it is important to note that some<br />
new compounds that were not described by the previous group were detected (Figure 14.9). Geraniol<br />
(271) was mainly transformed to (2E,5E)-3,7-dimethyl-2,5-octadiene-1,7-diol (318), (E)-3,7-<br />
dimethyl-2,7-octadiene-1,6-diol (319), <strong>and</strong> (2E,6E)-2,6-dimethyl-2,6-octadiene-1,8-diol (300); nerol<br />
(272) to (2Z,5E)-3,7-dimethyl-2,5-octadiene-1,7-diol (314), (Z)-3,7-dimethyl-2,7-octadiene-1,6-diol<br />
(315), <strong>and</strong> (2E,6Z)-2,6-dimethyl-2,6-octadiene-1,8-diol (316). Furthermore, a cyclization product<br />
(318) that was not previously described was formed. Finally, citronellol (258) was converted to<br />
trans- (312) <strong>and</strong> cis-rose oxide (313) (a cyclization product not identified by the other group), (E)-3,7-<br />
dimethyl-5-octene-1,7-diol (311), 3,7-dimethyl-7-octene-1,6-diol (260), <strong>and</strong> (E)-2,6-dimethyl-2-<br />
octene-1,8-diol (265) (Miyazawa et al., 1996a) (Figure 14.10).<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the latest reports in this area described the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> citronellol by the plant<br />
pathogenic fungus Glomerella cingulata to 3,7-dimethyl-1,6,7-octanetriol (Miyazawa et al., 1996a).<br />
The ability <strong>of</strong> fungal spores <strong>of</strong> Penicillium digitatum to biotransform monoterpene alcohols,<br />
such as geraniol (271) <strong>and</strong> nerol (272) <strong>and</strong> a mixture <strong>of</strong> the aldehydes, that is, citral (276 <strong>and</strong> 275),<br />
has only been discovered very recently by Demyttenaera <strong>and</strong> coworkers (Demyttenaera et al., 1996,<br />
2000; Demyttenaera <strong>and</strong> De Pooter, 1996, 1998). Spores <strong>of</strong> Penicillium digitatum were inoculated<br />
on solid media. After a short incubation period, the spores germinated <strong>and</strong> a mycelial mat was<br />
formed. After 2 weeks, the culture had completely sporulated <strong>and</strong> bioconversion reactions were<br />
started. Geraniol (271), nerol (272), or citral (276 <strong>and</strong> 275) were sprayed onto the sporulated surface<br />
culture. After 1 or 2 days, the period during which transformation took place, the cultures were<br />
extracted. Geraniol <strong>and</strong> nerol were transformed into 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one by sporulated surface<br />
cultures <strong>of</strong> Pencillium digitatum. The spores retained their activity for at least 2 months. An overall<br />
yield <strong>of</strong> up to 99% could be achieved.<br />
The bioconversion <strong>of</strong> geraniol (271) <strong>and</strong> nerol (272) was also performed with sporulated surface<br />
cultures <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus niger. Geraniol (271) was converted to linalool (206), a-terpineol (34), <strong>and</strong>
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 595<br />
H<br />
H<br />
258<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
311<br />
5 6 7<br />
CH 2 OH CH 2 OH 4 CH 2 OH<br />
3<br />
OH<br />
260<br />
OH<br />
2<br />
265<br />
1<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
312<br />
O<br />
313<br />
272<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
314<br />
CH 2 OH CH 2 OH CH 2 OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
315<br />
316<br />
8<br />
1<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
317<br />
271<br />
CH 2 OH CH 2 OH CH 2 OH 3<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
4 2<br />
OH<br />
5<br />
6<br />
318<br />
OH<br />
319<br />
300<br />
7<br />
8<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 14.10 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> geraniol (271), nerol (272), <strong>and</strong> citronellol (258) by Botrytis cinerea.<br />
(Modified from Miyazawa, M. et al., 1996a. Nat. Prod. Lett., 8: 303–305.)<br />
limonene (68), <strong>and</strong> nerol (272) was converted mainly to linalool (206) <strong>and</strong> a-terpineol (34)<br />
(Demyttenaera et al., 2000).<br />
The biotransformation <strong>of</strong> geraniol (271) <strong>and</strong> nerol (272) by Catharanthus roseus suspension<br />
cells was carried out. It was found that the allylic positions <strong>of</strong> geraniol (271) <strong>and</strong> nerol (272) were<br />
hydroxylated <strong>and</strong> reduced to double bond <strong>and</strong> ketones (Figure 14.11). Geraniol (271) <strong>and</strong> nerol (272)<br />
were isomerized to each other. Geraniol (271) <strong>and</strong> nerol (272) were hydroxylated at C10 to<br />
CH 2 OH CH 2 OH CH 2 OH CH 2 OH<br />
258 271<br />
300 CH 2 OH<br />
265<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
272<br />
320 CH 2 OH<br />
FIGURE 14.11 The biotransformation <strong>of</strong> geraniol (271) <strong>and</strong> nerol (272) by Catharanthus roseus. (Modified<br />
from Hamada, H. <strong>and</strong> H. Yasumune, 1995. Proc. 39th TEAC, pp. 375–377.)
596 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
8-hydroxygeraniol (300) <strong>and</strong> 8-hydroxynerol (320), respectively. 8-Hydroxygeraniol (300) was<br />
hydrogenated to 10-hydroxycitronellol (265). Geraniol (271) was hydrogenated to citronellol (258)<br />
(Hamada <strong>and</strong> Yasumune, 1995).<br />
Cyanobacterium converted geraniol (271) to geranic acid (278) via geranial (276), followed by<br />
hydrogenation to give citronellic acid (262) via citronellal (261). Furthermore, the substrate 271 was<br />
isomerized to nerol (272), followed by oxidation, reduction, <strong>and</strong> further oxidation to afford neral<br />
(275), citronellal (261), citronellic acid (262), <strong>and</strong> nerolic acid (277) (Kaji et al., 2002; Hamada<br />
et al., 2004) (Figure 14.12).<br />
Plant suspension cells <strong>of</strong> Catharanthus roseus converted geraniol (271) to 8-hydroxygeraniol<br />
(300). The same cells converted citronellol (258) to 8- (265) <strong>and</strong> 10-hydroxycitronellol (264)<br />
(Hamada et al., 2004) (Figure 14.13).<br />
Nerol (272) was converted by the insect lavae Spodoptera litura to give 8-hydroxynerol (320),<br />
10-hydroxynerol (321), 1-hydroxy-3,7-dimethyl-(2E,6E)-octadienal (322), <strong>and</strong> 1-hydroxy-3,7-<br />
dimethyl-(2E,6E)-octadienoic acid (323) (Takeuchi <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 2004) (Figure 14.14).<br />
14.2.2.2 Linalool <strong>and</strong> Linalyl Acetate<br />
(+)-Linalool (206) [(S)-3,7-dimethyl-1,6-octadiene-3-ol] <strong>and</strong> its enantiomer (206¢) ((R)-3,7-dimethyl-<br />
1,6-octadiene-3-ol) occur in many essential oils, where they are <strong>of</strong>ten the main component. (S)-(+)-<br />
Linalool (206) makes up 60–70% <strong>of</strong> cori<strong>and</strong>er oil. (R)-(-)-linalool (206¢), for example, occurs at a<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> 80–85% in Ho oils from Cinnamomum camphora; rosewood oil contains ca. 80%<br />
(Bauer et al., 1990).<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CHO<br />
COOH<br />
271 276 278<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CHO<br />
COOH<br />
258<br />
261 262<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CHO<br />
COOH<br />
272 275 277<br />
OH<br />
206<br />
FIGURE 14.12 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> geraniol (271) <strong>and</strong> citronellol (258) by Cyanobacterium.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 597<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
Catharanthus<br />
roseus<br />
271 300<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
Catharanthus<br />
roseus<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
+<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
258 265<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
HOH 2 C<br />
264<br />
FIGURE 14.13 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> geraniol (271), citronellol (258), <strong>and</strong> linalool (206) by plant suspension<br />
cells <strong>of</strong> Catharanthus roseus. (Modified from Hamada, H. et al., 2004. Proc. 48th TEAC, pp. 393–395.)<br />
CH 2 OH CH 2 OH CH 2 OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CHO<br />
320 322 323<br />
COOH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
272<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
HOH 2 C<br />
321<br />
FIGURE 14.14 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> nerol (272) by Spodoptera litura. (Modified from Takeuchi, H. <strong>and</strong><br />
M. Miyazawa, 2004. Proc. 48th TEAC, pp. 399–400.)<br />
Catharanthus roseus converted (+)-linalool (206) to 8-hydroxylinalool (219) (Hamada et al.,<br />
2004) (Figure 14.15).<br />
The biodegradation <strong>of</strong> (+)-linalool (206) by Pseudomonas pseudomallei (strain A), which grows<br />
on linalool as the sole carbon source, was described in 1973 (Murakami et al., 1973) (Figure 14.16).<br />
Madyastha et al. (1977) isolated a soil Pseudomonad, Pseudomonas incognita, by the enrichment<br />
culture technique with linalool as the sole carbon source. This microorganism, the “linalool strain”<br />
as it was called, was also capable <strong>of</strong> utilizing limonene (68), citronellol (258), <strong>and</strong> geraniol (271) but<br />
failed to grow on citral (275 <strong>and</strong> 276), citronellal (261), <strong>and</strong> 1,8-cineole (122). Fermentation was<br />
carried out with shake cultures containing 1% linalool (206) as the sole carbon source. It was suggested<br />
by the authors that linalool (206) was metabolized by at least three different pathways <strong>of</strong><br />
biodegradation (Figure 14.19). One <strong>of</strong> the pathways appeared to be initiated by the specific oxygenation<br />
<strong>of</strong> C-8 methyl group <strong>of</strong> linalool (206), leading to 8-hydroxylinalool (219), which was further<br />
oxidized to linalool-8-carboxylic acid (220). The presence <strong>of</strong> furanoid linalool oxide (215) <strong>and</strong><br />
2-methyl-2-vinyltetrahydr<strong>of</strong>uran-5-one (216) as the unsaturated lactone in the fermentation medium
598 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
206 (S)-<br />
(+)-linalool<br />
206' (R)-<br />
(–)-linalool<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
Catharanthus<br />
roseus<br />
206<br />
219<br />
CH 2<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 14.15 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> linalool (206) by plant suspension cells <strong>of</strong> Catharanthus roseus.<br />
(Modified from Hamada, H. et al., 2004. Proc. 48th TEAC, pp. 393–395.)<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
COOHC OOH COOH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
206 219<br />
220 221 222 223 224<br />
FIGURE 14.16 Degradative metabolic pathway <strong>of</strong> (+)-linalool (206) by Pseudomonas pseudomallei.<br />
(Modified from Murakami, T. et al., 1973. Nippon Nogei Kagaku Kaishi, 47: 699–703.)<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
3 6<br />
O<br />
215a<br />
trans<br />
3R, 6R<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
O<br />
215b<br />
cis<br />
3S, 6R<br />
H<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
215a'<br />
trans<br />
3S, 6S<br />
FIGURE 14.17 Four stereoisomers <strong>of</strong> furanoid linalool oxides. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., Proc. 30th<br />
TEAC, pp. 204–206.)<br />
suggested another mode <strong>of</strong> utilization <strong>of</strong> linalool (206). The formation <strong>of</strong> these compounds was<br />
believed to proceed through the epoxidation <strong>of</strong> the 6,7-double bond giving rise to 6,7-epoxylinalool<br />
(214), which upon further oxidation yielded furanoid linalool oxide (215) <strong>and</strong> 2-methyl-2-vinyltetrahydr<strong>of</strong>uran-5-one<br />
(216) (Figure 14.19).<br />
The presence <strong>of</strong> oleuropeic acid (204) in the fermentation broth suggested a third pathway. Two<br />
possibilities were proposed: (3a) water elimination giving rise to a monocyclic cation (33), yielding<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
215b'<br />
cis<br />
3R, 6S
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 599<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
3<br />
6<br />
O<br />
217a<br />
trans<br />
3 S, 6 R<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
217b'<br />
cis<br />
3 R, 6 R<br />
O<br />
O<br />
217b<br />
cis<br />
3 S, 6 S<br />
217a'<br />
trans<br />
3 R, 6 S<br />
FIGURE 14.18 Four stereoisomers <strong>of</strong> pyranoid linalool oxides.<br />
a-terpineol (34), which upon oxidation gave oleuropeic acid (204); (3b) oxidation <strong>of</strong> the C-10 methyl<br />
group <strong>of</strong> linalool (206) before cyclization, giving rise to oleuropeic acid (204). This last pathway<br />
was also called the “prototropic cyclization” (Madyastha, 1984).<br />
Racemic linalool (206 <strong>and</strong> 206¢) is cyclized into cis- <strong>and</strong> trans-linalool oxides by various microorganisms<br />
such as Streptomyces albus NRRL B1865, Streptomyces hygroscopicus NRRL B3444,<br />
Streptomyces cinnamonnensis ATCC 15413, Streptomyces griseus ATCC 10137, <strong>and</strong> Beauveria<br />
sulfurescens ATACC 7159 (David <strong>and</strong> Veschambre, 1984) (Figure 14.19).<br />
Aspergillus niger isolated from garden soil biotransformed linalool <strong>and</strong> its acetates to give linalool<br />
(206), 2,6-dimethyl-2,7-octadiene-1,6-diol (8-hydroxylinalool (219a), a-terpineol (34), geraniol (271),<br />
<strong>and</strong> some unidentified products in trace amounts (Madyastha <strong>and</strong> Krishna Murthy, 1988a, 1988b).<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
see<br />
Fig.15<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
215<br />
O<br />
O<br />
216<br />
COOH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
220 219 214<br />
2<br />
1<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
3b<br />
+<br />
3a<br />
206<br />
211<br />
+<br />
213<br />
+<br />
COOH<br />
+<br />
+<br />
OH<br />
207 208 33 34<br />
204<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 14.19 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> linalool (206) by Pseudomonas incognita (Madyastha et al., 1977) <strong>and</strong><br />
Streptomyces albus NRRL B1865. (Modified from David, L. <strong>and</strong> H. Veschambre, 1984. Tetrahadron Lett.,<br />
25: 543–546.)
600 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
219a<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
219b<br />
324<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
215a<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
215b<br />
O<br />
O<br />
216<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
217a 217b 217a-Ac 217b-Ac<br />
FIGURE 14.20 Biotransformation products <strong>of</strong> linalool (206) by Botrytis cinerea. (Modified from Bock, G.<br />
et al., 1986. J. Food Sci., 51: 659–662.)<br />
The biotransformation <strong>of</strong> linalool (206) by Botrytis cinerea was carried out <strong>and</strong> identified transformation<br />
products such as (E)-(219a) <strong>and</strong> (Z)-2,6-dimethyl-2,7-octadiene-1,6-diol (219b), trans-<br />
(215a) <strong>and</strong> cis-furanoid linalool oxide (215b), trans- (217a) <strong>and</strong> cis-pyranoid linalool oxide (217b)<br />
(Figure 14.18) <strong>and</strong> their acetates (217a-Ac, 217b-Ac), 3,9-epoxy-p-menth-1-ene (324) <strong>and</strong> 2-methyl-<br />
2-vinyl-tetrahydr<strong>of</strong>uran-5-one (216) (unsaturated lactone) (Bock et al., 1986) (Figure 14.20).<br />
Quantitative analysis, however, showed that linalool (206) was predominantly (90%) metabolized to<br />
(E)-2,6-dimethyl-2,7-octadiene-1,6-diol (219a) by Botrytis cinerea. The other compounds were<br />
only found as by-products in minor concentrations.<br />
The bioconversion <strong>of</strong> (S)-(+)-linalool (206) <strong>and</strong> (R)-(-)-linalool (206¢) was investigated with<br />
Diplodia gossypina ATCC 10936 (Abraham et al., 1990). The biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (±)-linalool (206<br />
<strong>and</strong> 206¢) by Aspergillus niger ATCC 9142 with submerged shaking culture yielded a mixture <strong>of</strong><br />
cis- (215b) <strong>and</strong> trans-furanoid linalool oxide (215a) (yield 15–24%) <strong>and</strong> cis- (217b) <strong>and</strong> transpyranoid<br />
linalool oxide (217a) (yield 5–9%) (Demyttenaere <strong>and</strong> Willemen, 1998). The biotransformation<br />
<strong>of</strong> (R)-(-)-linalool (206a) with Aspergillus niger ATCC 9142 yielded almost pure<br />
trans-furanoid linalool oxide (215a) <strong>and</strong> trans-pyranoid linalool oxide (217a) (ee > 95) (Figure<br />
14.21). These conversions were purely biocatalytic, since in acidified water (pH < 3.5) almost 50%<br />
linalool (206) was recovered unchanged, the rest was evaporated. The biotransformation was also<br />
carried out with growing surface cultures.<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
A. niger ATCC 9142<br />
O<br />
H<br />
+<br />
HO O O<br />
215a<br />
217a<br />
206' 214'<br />
FIGURE 14.21 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (R)-(-)-linalool (206¢) by Aspergillus niger ATCC 9142. (Modified<br />
from Demyttenaere, J.C.R. <strong>and</strong> H.M. Willemen, 1998. Phytochemistry, 47: 1029–1036.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 601<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
S. ikutamanensis,<br />
Ya-2-1<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
3 6<br />
O<br />
215a<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
O<br />
215b<br />
206a<br />
214a<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
H<br />
S. ikutamanensis,<br />
Ya-2-1<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
215a'<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
215b'<br />
206b<br />
214b<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
215a<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
215b<br />
S. ikutamanensis,<br />
Ya-2-1<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
206ab<br />
214ab<br />
215a'<br />
215b'<br />
FIGURE 14.22 Metabolic pathway <strong>of</strong> (+)- (206), (-)- (206¢), <strong>and</strong> racemic linalool (206 <strong>and</strong> 206¢) by<br />
Streptomyces ikutamanensis, Ya-2-1. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1986. Proc. 30th TEAC, pp. 204–206.)<br />
H<br />
H<br />
Streptomyces ikutamanensis, Ya-2-1 also converted (+)- (206), (-)- (206¢), <strong>and</strong> racemic linalool<br />
(206 <strong>and</strong> 206¢) via corresponding 2,3-epoxides (214 <strong>and</strong> 214¢) to trans- <strong>and</strong> cis-furanoid linalool<br />
oxides (215a, b, a¢ <strong>and</strong> b¢) (Noma et al., 1986) (Figure 14.22). The absolute configuration at C-3 <strong>and</strong><br />
C-6 <strong>of</strong> trans- <strong>and</strong> cis-linalool oxides are shown in Figure 14.17.<br />
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> racemic trans-pyranoid linalool oxide (217a <strong>and</strong> a¢) <strong>and</strong> racemic cislinalool-pyranoid<br />
(217b <strong>and</strong> b¢) has been carried out using fungus Glomerella cingulata<br />
(Miyazawa et al., 1994a). trans <strong>and</strong> cis-Pyranoid linalool oxide (217a <strong>and</strong> 217b) were transformed<br />
to trans- (217a¢-1) <strong>and</strong> cis-linalool oxide-3-malonate (217b¢-1), respectively. In the<br />
biotransformation <strong>of</strong> racemic cis-linalool oxide-pyranoid, (+)-(3R,6R)-cis-pyranoid linalool oxide<br />
(217a <strong>and</strong> a¢) was converted to (3R,6R)-pyranoid-cis-linalool oxide-3-malonate (217a¢-1). (-)-(3S,<br />
6S)-cis-Pyranoid linalool oxide-pyranoid (217a¢) was not metabolized. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, in the<br />
biotransformation <strong>of</strong> racemic trans-pyranoid linalool oxide (217b <strong>and</strong> b¢), (-)-(3R,6S)-trans-linalool<br />
oxide (217b¢) was transformed to (3R,6S)-trans-linalool oxide-3-malonate (217b¢-1)<br />
(Figure 14.23). (+)-(3S,6S)-trans-Pyranoid-linalool oxide (217b) was not metabolized. These<br />
facts showed that Glomerella cingulata recognized absolute configuration <strong>of</strong> the secondary<br />
hydroxyl group at C-3. On the basis <strong>of</strong> this result, it has become apparent the optical resolution <strong>of</strong><br />
racemic pyranoid linalool oxide proceeded in the biotransformation with Glomerella cingulata<br />
(Miyazawa et al., 1994a).<br />
Linalool (206) <strong>and</strong> tetrahydrolinalool (325) were converted by suspension cells <strong>of</strong> Catharanthus<br />
roseus to give 1-hydroxylinalool (219) from linalool (206) <strong>and</strong> 3,7-dimethyloctane-3,5-diol (326),<br />
3,7-dimethyloctane-3,7-diol (327), <strong>and</strong> 3,7-dimethyloctane-3,8-diol (328) from tetrahydrolinalool<br />
(325) (Hamada <strong>and</strong> Furuya, 2000; Hamada et al., 2004) (Figure 14.24).
602 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
HO<br />
3<br />
8<br />
O<br />
217a&a'<br />
217a: (3S, 6R)<br />
217a': (3R, 6S)<br />
G. cingulata<br />
RO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
+<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
217a'<br />
217a<br />
(3R, 6S)<br />
217a: (3S, 6R)<br />
217a'-1: R-H<br />
217a'-2: R=CH 3<br />
HO<br />
3<br />
8<br />
O<br />
217b&b'<br />
217b: (3S, 6S)<br />
217b': (3R, 6R)<br />
G. cingulata<br />
RO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
217b'<br />
(3S, 6R)<br />
217b'-1: R-H<br />
217b'-2: R=CH 3<br />
+<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
217b<br />
217a': (3S, 6S)<br />
FIGURE 14.23 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> racemic trans-linalool oxide-pyranoid (217a <strong>and</strong> a¢) <strong>and</strong> racemic<br />
cis-linalool-pyranoid (217b <strong>and</strong> b¢) by Glomerella cingulata. (Modified from Miyazawa, M. et al., 1994a.<br />
Proc. 38th TEAC, pp. 101–102.)<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
C. roseus<br />
206<br />
219<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
C. roseus<br />
+ +<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
325<br />
326 327 328<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
FIGURE 14.24 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> linalool (206) <strong>and</strong> tetrahydrolinalool (325) by Catharanthus roseus.<br />
(Modified from Hamada, H. <strong>and</strong> T. Furuya, 2000. Proc. 44th TEAC, pp. 167–168; Hamada, H. et al., 2004.<br />
Proc. 48th TEAC, pp. 393–395.)<br />
(±)-Linalyl acetate (206-Ac) was hydrolyzed to (+)-(S)-linalool (206) <strong>and</strong> (±)-linallyl acetate<br />
(206-Ac) by Bacillus subtilis, Trichoderma S, Absidia glauca, <strong>and</strong> Gibberella fujikuroi as shown in<br />
Figure 14.25. But, (±)-dihydrolinallyl acetate (469-Ac) was not hydrolyzed by the above microorganisms<br />
(Oritani <strong>and</strong> Yamashita, 1973a).<br />
14.2.2.3 Dihydromycenol<br />
Dihydromyrcenol (329) was fed by Spodptera litura to give 1,2-epoxydihydro-myrcenol (330) as a<br />
main products <strong>and</strong> 3b-hydroxydidyromyrcerol (331) as a minor product. Dihydromyrcenyl acetate<br />
(332) was converted to 1,2-dihydroxydihydromyrcenyl acetate (333) (Murata <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 1999)<br />
(Figure 14.26).
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 603<br />
OAc<br />
OH<br />
OAc<br />
B. subtilis<br />
+<br />
206-Ac<br />
OAc<br />
206<br />
(+)-(S)<br />
206-Ac<br />
(+ –)<br />
469-Ac<br />
FIGURE 14.25 Hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> (±)-linalyl acetate (206-Ac) by microorganisms. (Modified from Oritani, T.<br />
<strong>and</strong> K. Yamashita, 1973a. Agric. Biol. Chem., 37: 1923–1928.)<br />
OH<br />
329<br />
OH<br />
330<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
+<br />
331<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OAc<br />
OH<br />
OAc<br />
FIGURE 14.26 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> dihydromyrcenol (329) <strong>and</strong> dihydromyrcenyl acetate (332) by<br />
Spodptera litura. (Modified from Murata, T. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 1999. Proc. 43rd TEAC, pp. 393–394.)<br />
14.3 METABOLIC PATHWAYS OF CYCLIC MONOTERPENOIDS<br />
14.3.1 MONOCYCLIC MONOTERPENE HYDROCARBON<br />
14.3.1.1 Limonene<br />
332 333<br />
68<br />
(R)-limonene<br />
68'<br />
(S)-limonene<br />
Limonene is the most widely distributed terpene in nature after a-pinene (4) (Krasnobajew, 1984).<br />
(4R)-(+)-Limonene (68) is present in Citrus peel oils at a concentration <strong>of</strong> over 90%; a low concentration<br />
<strong>of</strong> the (4S)-(-)-limonene (68¢) is found in oils from the Mentha species <strong>and</strong> conifers
604 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
(Bauer et al., 1990). The first microbial biotransformation on limonene was carried out by using a soil<br />
Pseudomonad. The microorganism was isolated by the enrichment culture technique on limonene as<br />
the sole source <strong>of</strong> carbon (Dhavalikar <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya, 1966). The microorganism was also capable<br />
<strong>of</strong> growing on a-pinene (4), b-pinene (1), 1-p-menthene (62), <strong>and</strong> p-cymene (178). The optimal level<br />
<strong>of</strong> limonene for growth was 0.3–0.6% (v/v) although no toxicity was observed at 2% levels.<br />
Fermentation <strong>of</strong> limonene (68) by this bacterium in a mineral-salts medium resulted in the formation<br />
<strong>of</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong> neutral <strong>and</strong> acidic products such as dihydrocarvone (64), carvone (61), carveol<br />
(60), 8-p-menthene-1,2-cis-diol (65b), 8-p-menthen-1-ol-2-one (66), 8-p-menthene-1,2-trans-diol<br />
(65a), <strong>and</strong> 1-p-menthene-6,9-diol (62). Perillic acid (69), b-isopropenyl pimeric acid (72), 2-hydroxy-<br />
8-p-menthen-7-oic acid (70), <strong>and</strong> 4,9-dihydroxy-1-p-menthen-7-oic acid (73) were isolated <strong>and</strong><br />
identified as acidic compounds. Based on these data three distinct pathways for the catabolism <strong>of</strong><br />
limonene (68) by the soil Pseudomonad were proposed by Dhavalikar et al. (1966), involving allylic<br />
oxygenation (pathway1), oxygenation <strong>of</strong> the 1,2-double bond (pathway 2), <strong>and</strong> progressive oxidation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 7-methyl group to perillic acid (82) (pathway 3) (Figure 14.27) (Krasnobajew, 1984). Pathway<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
93<br />
OH<br />
Pathway 1<br />
108<br />
90<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
Pathway 2<br />
68<br />
69 101<br />
HO<br />
Pathway 3<br />
(main pathway)<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
HOOC<br />
COOH<br />
HO<br />
71<br />
OH<br />
72 83<br />
86<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CHO<br />
COOH COOH COOH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
74 78 82 84 85<br />
FIGURE 14.27 Pathways for the degradation <strong>of</strong> limonene (68) by a soil Pseudomonad sp. strain (L). (Modified<br />
from Krasnobajew, V., 1984. In: Biotechnology, K. Kieslich, ed., Vol. 6a, pp. 97–125. Weinheim: Verlag Chemie.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 605<br />
2 yields (+)-dihydrocarvone (101) via intermediate limonene epoxide (69) <strong>and</strong> 8-p-menthen-1-ol-2-<br />
one (72) as oxidation product <strong>of</strong> limonene-1,2-diol (71). The third <strong>and</strong> main pathway leads to perillyl<br />
alcohol (74), perillaldehyde (78), perillic acid (82), constituents <strong>of</strong> various essential oils <strong>and</strong> used in<br />
the flavour <strong>and</strong> fragrance industry (Fenaroli, 1975), 2-oxo-8-p-menthen-7-oic acid (85), b-isopropenyl<br />
pimeric acid (86), <strong>and</strong> 4,9-dihydroxy-1-p-menthene-7-oic acid (83).<br />
(+)-Limonene (68) was biotransformed via limonene-1,2-epoxide (69) to 8-p-menthene 1,2-<br />
trans-diol (71b). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, (+)-carvone (93) was biotransformed via (-)-isodihydrocarvone<br />
(101b) <strong>and</strong> 1a-hydroxydihydrocarvone (72) to (+)-8-p-menthene-1,2-trans-diol (71a) (Noma et al.,<br />
1985a, 1985b) (Figure 14.28). A soil Pseudomonad formed 1-hydroxydihydrocarvone (72),<br />
8-p- menthene-1,2-trans-diol (71b) from (+)-limonene (68). Dhavalikar <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya (1966)<br />
considered that the formation <strong>of</strong> 1-hydroxy-dihydrocarvone (66) is from dihydrocarvone (64).<br />
Pseudomonas gladioli was isolated by an enrichment culture technique from pine bark <strong>and</strong> sap<br />
using a mineral salts broth with limonene as the sole carbon source (Cadwall<strong>and</strong>er et al., 1989;<br />
Cadwall<strong>and</strong>er <strong>and</strong> Braddock, 1992). Fermentation was performed during 4–10 days in shake flasks<br />
at 25∞C using a pH 6.5 mineral salts medium <strong>and</strong> 1.0% (+)-limonene (68). Major products were<br />
identified as (+)-a-terpineol (34) <strong>and</strong> (+)-perillic acid (82). This was the first report <strong>of</strong> the microbial<br />
conversion <strong>of</strong> limonene to (+)-a-terpineol (34).<br />
The first data on fungal bioconversion <strong>of</strong> limonene (68) date back to the late 1960s (Kraidman<br />
et al., 1969; Noma, 2007). Three soil microorganisms were isolated on <strong>and</strong> grew rapidly in mineral<br />
salts media containing appropriate terpene substrates as sole carbon sources. The microorganisms<br />
belonged to the class Fungi Imperfecti, <strong>and</strong> they had been tentatively identified as Cladosporium<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
96<br />
O<br />
97<br />
O<br />
103<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
98<br />
O<br />
O<br />
102<br />
105<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
94<br />
OH<br />
93<br />
OH<br />
101<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
92<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
81<br />
O<br />
62<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
72<br />
OH<br />
71<br />
OH<br />
68<br />
69<br />
71<br />
334<br />
FIGURE 14.28 Formation <strong>of</strong> (+)-8-p-menthene-1,2-trans-diol (71b) in the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-limonene<br />
(68) <strong>and</strong> (+)-carvone (93) by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1985a. Annual Meeting<br />
<strong>of</strong> Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Biological Chemistry, Sapporo, p. 68; Noma, Y. et al., Proc. 29th TEAC, pp. 235–237.)
606 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
species. One <strong>of</strong> these strains, designated as Cladosporium sp. T 7 was isolated on (+)-limonene<br />
(68a). The growth medium <strong>of</strong> this strain contained 1.5 g/L <strong>of</strong> trans-limonene-1,2-diol (71a). Minor<br />
quantities <strong>of</strong> the corresponding cis-1,2-diol (71b) were also isolated. The same group isolated a<br />
fourth microorganism from a terpene-soaked soil on mineral salts media containing (+)-limonene<br />
as the sole carbon source (Kraidman et al., 1969). The strain, Cladosporium, designated T 12 , was<br />
capable <strong>of</strong> converting (+)-limonene (68a) into an optically active isomer <strong>of</strong> a-terpineol (34) in yields<br />
<strong>of</strong> approximately 1.0 g/L.<br />
a-Terpineol (34) was obtained from (+)-limonene (68) by fungi such as Penicillium digitatum,<br />
Pencillium italicum, <strong>and</strong> Cladosporium <strong>and</strong> several bacteria (Figure 14.29). (+)-cis-Carveol (81b),<br />
(+)-carvone (93) [an important constituent <strong>of</strong> caraway seed <strong>and</strong> dill-seed oils (Fenaroli, 1975;<br />
Bouwmester et al., 1995), <strong>and</strong> 1-p-menthene-6,9-diol (90) were also obtained by Pencillium digitatum<br />
<strong>and</strong> Pencillium italicum. (+)-(S)-Carvone (93) is a natural potato sprout inhibiting, fungistatic,<br />
<strong>and</strong> bacteriostatic compound (Oosterhaven et al., 1995a, 1995b). It is important to note that<br />
(-)-carvone (93¢, the “spearmint flavour”] was not yet described in microbial transformation<br />
(Krasnobajew, 1984). However, the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> limonene to (-)-carvone (93¢) was patented<br />
by a Japanese group (Takagi et al., 1972). Corynebacterium species grown on limonene was able to<br />
produce about 10 mg/L <strong>of</strong> 99% pure (-)-carvone (93¢) in 24–48 h.<br />
Mattison et al. (1971) isolated Penicillium sp. cultures from rotting orange rind that utilized limonene<br />
(68) <strong>and</strong> converted it rapidly to a-terpineol (34). Bowen (1975) isolated two common Citrus moulds,<br />
Penicillium italicum <strong>and</strong> Penicillium digitatum, responsible for the postharvest diseases <strong>of</strong> Citrus fruits.<br />
Fermentation <strong>of</strong> Penicillium italicum on limonene (68) yielded cis- (81b) <strong>and</strong> trans-carveol (81a) (26%)<br />
as the main products, together with cis- <strong>and</strong> trans-p-mentha-2,8-dien-1-ol (73) (18%), (+)-carvone (93¢)<br />
(6%), p-mentha-1,8-dien-4-ol (80) (4%), perillyl alcohol (74) (3%), <strong>and</strong> 8-p-menthene-1,2-diol (71) (3%).<br />
Conversion <strong>of</strong> 68 by Penicillium digitatum yielded the same products in lower yields (Figure 14.29).<br />
The biotransformation <strong>of</strong> limonene (68) by Aspergillus niger is a very important example <strong>of</strong> fungal<br />
bioconversion. Screening for fungi capable <strong>of</strong> metabolizing the bicyclic hydrocarbon terpene a-pinene<br />
(4) yielded a strain <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus niger NCIM 612 that was also able to transform limonene (68) (Rama<br />
Devi <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya, 1978). This fungus was able to carry out three types <strong>of</strong> oxygenative rearrangements<br />
a-terpineol (34), carveol (81), <strong>and</strong> p-mentha-2,8-dien-1-ol (73) (Rama Devi <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya,<br />
1978) (Figure 14.30). In 1985, Abraham et al. (1985) investigated the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (R)-(+)-<br />
limonene (68a) by the fungus Penicillium digitatum. A complete transformation for the substrate to<br />
a-terpineol (34) by Penicillium digitatum DSM 62840 was obtained with 46% yield <strong>of</strong> pure product.<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
+ + + + +<br />
OH<br />
68 73<br />
80<br />
81<br />
93<br />
74<br />
71<br />
FIGURE 14.29 Biotransformation products <strong>of</strong> limonene (68) by Penicillium digitatum <strong>and</strong> Penicillium<br />
italicum. (Modified from Bowen, E.R., 1975. Proc. Fla. State Hortic. Soc., 88: 304–308.)<br />
A. niger<br />
OH<br />
+ +<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
68 34<br />
81<br />
73<br />
FIGURE 14.30 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> limonene (68) by Aspergillus niger NCIM 612. (Modified from Rama<br />
Devi, J. <strong>and</strong> P.K. Bhattacharyya, 1978. J. Indian Chem. Soc., 55: 1131–1137.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 607<br />
The production <strong>of</strong> glycols from limonene (68) <strong>and</strong> other terpenes with a 1-menthene skeleton was<br />
reported by Corynespora cassiicola DSM 62475 <strong>and</strong> Diplodia gossypina ATCC 10936 (Abraham<br />
et al., 1984). Accumulation <strong>of</strong> glycols during fermentation was observed. An extensive overview on<br />
the microbial transformations <strong>of</strong> terpenoids with a 1-p-menthene skeleton was published by Abraham<br />
et al. (1986).<br />
The biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-limonene (68) was carried out by using Aspergillus cellulosae M-77<br />
(Noma et al., 1992b) (Figure 14.32). It is important to note that (+)-limonene (68a) was mainly<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
68<br />
81a<br />
81b<br />
O<br />
93<br />
O<br />
74<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
111<br />
71a<br />
1S,2S,4R<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
334<br />
OH<br />
34<br />
OH<br />
101a<br />
OH<br />
101b<br />
OH<br />
71b<br />
1S,2R,4R<br />
71 c II-P<br />
1S,2S,4S<br />
102a<br />
OH<br />
102b<br />
OH<br />
102c<br />
OH<br />
102d<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
102a'<br />
102b'<br />
102c'<br />
102d'<br />
71b '<br />
1R,2S,4S<br />
71c '<br />
1R,2R,4R<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
68'<br />
81a'<br />
81b'<br />
93'<br />
74'<br />
111'<br />
71a '<br />
1R,2R,4S<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH OH<br />
34'<br />
334'<br />
101b'<br />
101a'<br />
FIGURE 14.31 (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-limonenes (68 <strong>and</strong> 68¢) <strong>and</strong> related compounds.
608 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
A. cellulosae<br />
O<br />
+<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
+<br />
OH<br />
+<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
68<br />
111 74<br />
FIGURE 14.32 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-limonene (68) by Aspergillus cellulosae IFO4040. (Modified from<br />
Noma, Y. et al., 1992b. Phytochemistry, 31: 2725–2727.)<br />
converted to (+)-isopiperitenone (111) (19%) as new metabolite, (1S,2S,4R)-(+)-limonene-1,2-transdiol<br />
(71a) (21%), (+)-cis-carveol (81b) (5%), <strong>and</strong> (+)-perillyl alcohol (74) (12%) (Figure 14.32).<br />
(+)-Limonene (68) was biotransformed by a kind <strong>of</strong> Citrus pathogenic fungi, Penicillium digitatum<br />
(Pers.; Fr.) Sacc. KCPYN. to isopiperitenone (111, 7% GC ratio), 2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (125b, 7%),<br />
(+)-limonene-1,2-trans-diol (71a, 6%), <strong>and</strong> (+)-p-menthane-1b,2a,8-triol (334, 45%) as main products<br />
<strong>and</strong> (+)-trans-sobrerol (95a, 2%), (+)-trans-carveol (81a), (+)-carvone (93), (-)-isodihydrocarvone<br />
(101b), <strong>and</strong> (+)-trans-isopiperitenol (110a) as minor products (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 2006a, 2007a)<br />
(Figure 14.33). The metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (+)-limonene by Penicillium digitatum is shown in<br />
Figure 14.34.<br />
On the other h<strong>and</strong>, (-)-limonene (68¢) was also biotransformed by a kind <strong>of</strong> Citrus pathogenic fungi,<br />
Penicillium digitatum (Pers.; Fr.) Sacc. KCPYN. to give isopiperitenone (111¢), 2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole<br />
(125b¢), (-)-limonene-1,2-trans-diol (71¢), <strong>and</strong> p-menthane-1,2,8-triol (334¢) as main products together<br />
with (+)-trans-sobrerol (80¢), (+)-trans-carveol (81a¢), (-)-carvone (93¢), (-)-dihydrocarvone<br />
(101a¢), <strong>and</strong> (+)-isopiperitenol (110a¢) as minor products (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 2007b) (Figure 14.35.)<br />
Newly isolated unidentified red yeast, Rhodotorula sp., converted (+)-limonene (68) mainly to<br />
(+)-limonene-1,2-trans-diol (71a), (+)-trans-carveol (81a), (+)-cis-carveol (81b), <strong>and</strong> (+)-carvone<br />
(93¢) together with (+)-limonene-1,2-cis-diol (71b) as minor product (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 2007b)<br />
(Figure 14.36).<br />
Cladosporium sp. T 7 was cultivated with (+)-limonene (68) as the sole carbon source; it converted<br />
68 to trans-p-menthane-1,2-diol (71a) (Figure 14.36) (Mukherjee et al., 1973).<br />
On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the same red yeast converted (-)-limonene (68¢) mainly to (-)-limonene-1,2-<br />
trans-diol (71a¢), (-)-trans-carveol (81a¢), (-)-cis-carveol (81b¢), <strong>and</strong> (-)-carvone (93¢) together with<br />
(-)-limonene-1,2-cis-diol (71b¢) as minor product (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 2007b) (Figure 14.37).<br />
The biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-limonene (68 <strong>and</strong> 68¢), (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-a-terpineol (34 <strong>and</strong><br />
34¢), (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-limonene-1,2-epoxide (69 <strong>and</strong> 69¢), <strong>and</strong> caraway oil was carried out by Citrus<br />
81<br />
71a<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
68<br />
111<br />
125b<br />
71a<br />
334<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
95a 81a 93 101a 110a<br />
FIGURE 14.33 Metabolites <strong>of</strong> (+)-limonene (68) by a kind <strong>of</strong> Citrus pathogenic fungi, Penicillium digitatum<br />
(Pers.; Fr.) Sacc. KCPYN. (Modified from Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2006a. Proc. 50th TEAC, pp. 431–433;<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2007a. Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 38th ISEO, p. 7.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 609<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
71a<br />
HO<br />
69<br />
81a 93 101b<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
334<br />
34<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
68 110a 111<br />
O<br />
125b<br />
FIGURE 14.34 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-limonene (68) by Citrus pathogenic fungi, Penicillium digitatum<br />
(Pers.; Fr.) Sacc. KCPYN. (Modified from Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2006a. Proc. 50th TEAC, pp. 431–433;<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2007a. Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 38th ISEO, p. 7.)<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO HO<br />
71a'<br />
69'<br />
81a' 93' 101a'<br />
OH<br />
334'<br />
OH<br />
34'<br />
OH<br />
68'<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
110a'<br />
O<br />
111'<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
125b'<br />
95a'<br />
FIGURE 14.35 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-limonene (68¢) by Citrus pathogenic fungi, Penicillium digitatum<br />
(Pers.; Fr.) Sacc. KCPYN. (Modified from Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2007b. Proc. 51st TEAC, pp. 299–301.)<br />
pathogenic fungi Penicillium (Pers.; Fr.) Sacc. KCPYN <strong>and</strong> newly isolated red yeast, a kind <strong>of</strong><br />
Rhodotorula sp. Penicillium digitatum KCPYN converted limonenes (68 <strong>and</strong> 68¢) to the corresponding<br />
isopiperitone (111 <strong>and</strong> 111¢), 1a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (125b <strong>and</strong> 125b¢), limonene-1,2-<br />
trans-diol (71a <strong>and</strong> 71a¢), p-menthane-1,2,8-triol (334 <strong>and</strong> 334¢), <strong>and</strong> trans-sobrerol as main<br />
products. (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-a-Terpineol (34 <strong>and</strong> 34¢) were the precursors <strong>of</strong> 2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole<br />
(125b <strong>and</strong> b¢) <strong>and</strong> p-menthane-1,2,8-triol (334). (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-Limonene-1,2-epoxide (69 <strong>and</strong> 69¢)<br />
were also the precursor <strong>of</strong> limonene-1,2-trans-diol (71a). Rhodotorula sp. also biotransformed (+)-<br />
<strong>and</strong> (-)-limonene (68 <strong>and</strong> 68¢) to the corresponding trans- <strong>and</strong> cis-carveols (81a <strong>and</strong> b) as main<br />
products. This microbe also converted caraway oil, equal mixture <strong>of</strong> (+)-limonene (68) <strong>and</strong> (+)-carvone<br />
(93). (+)-Limonene (68) disappeared <strong>and</strong> (+)-carvone (93) was produced <strong>and</strong> accumulated in<br />
the cultured broth (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 2007b).
610 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
71a<br />
81a<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
68<br />
OH<br />
93<br />
71b<br />
FIGURE 14.36 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-limonene (68) by red yeast, Rhodotorula sp. <strong>and</strong> Cladosporium sp.<br />
T 7 . (Modified from Mukherjee, B.B. et al., 1973. Appl. Microbiol., 25: 447–453; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa,<br />
2007b. Proc. 51st TEAC, pp. 299–301.)<br />
81b<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
71a'<br />
81a'<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
68'<br />
OH<br />
93'<br />
71b'<br />
FIGURE 14.37 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-limonene (68¢) by a kind <strong>of</strong> Rhodotorula sp. (Modified from<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2007b. Proc. 51st TEAC, pp. 299–301.)<br />
(4S)-(-)- (68¢) <strong>and</strong> (4R)-(+)-Limonene (68) <strong>and</strong> their epoxides (69 <strong>and</strong> 69¢) were incubated by<br />
Cyanobacterium. It was found that the transformation was enantio- <strong>and</strong> regioselective. Cyanobacterium<br />
biotransformed only (4S)-limonene (68¢) to (-)-cis- (81b¢, 11.1%) <strong>and</strong> (-)-trans-carveol (81a¢, 5%) in<br />
low yield. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, (4R)-limonene oxide (69) was converted to limonene-1,2-trans-diol<br />
(71a¢) <strong>and</strong> 1-hydroxy-(+)-dihydrocarvone (72a¢). However, (4R)-(+)-limonene (68) <strong>and</strong> (4S)-limonene<br />
oxide (69¢) were not converted at all (Figure 14.38) (Hamada et al., 2003).<br />
(+)-Limonene (68) was fed by Spodptera litura to give (+)-limonene-7-oic acid (82), (+)-limonene-<br />
9-oic acid (70), <strong>and</strong> (+)-limonene-8,9-diol (79); (-)-limonene (68¢) was converted to (-)-linonene-7-<br />
oic acid (82¢), (-)-limonene-9-oic acid (70¢), <strong>and</strong> (-)-limonene-8,9-diol (79¢) (Figure 14.39)<br />
(Miyazawa et al., 1995a).<br />
Kieslich et al. (1985) found a nearly complete microbial resolution <strong>of</strong> a racemate in the biotransformation<br />
<strong>of</strong> (±)-limonene by Penicillium digitatum (DSM 62840). The (R)-(+)-limonene (68) is converted<br />
to the optically active (+)-a-terpineol, [a] D = +99∞, while the (S)-(-)-limonene (68¢) is presumably<br />
adsorbed onto the mycelium or degraded via unknown pathways (Kieslich et al., 1985) (Figure 14.40).<br />
(4S)- <strong>and</strong> (4R)-Limonene epoxides (69a¢ <strong>and</strong> a) were biotransformed by Cyanobacterium to give<br />
8-p-menthene-1a,2b-ol (71a, 68.4%) <strong>and</strong> 1a-hydroxy-8-p-menthen-2-one (72, 31.6%) (Hamada<br />
et al., 2003) (Figure 14.41).<br />
81b'
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 611<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
68<br />
69'<br />
71a'<br />
72a'<br />
OH<br />
+<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
68' 81a' 81b'<br />
69<br />
FIGURE 14.38 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-limonene (68 <strong>and</strong> 68¢) <strong>and</strong> limonene epoxide (69 <strong>and</strong> 69¢)<br />
by Cyanobacterium. (Modified from Hamada, H. et al., 2003. Proc. 47th TEAC, pp. 162–163.)<br />
COOH<br />
S. litura<br />
+ +<br />
68<br />
82<br />
70<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
79<br />
COOH<br />
S. litura<br />
+ +<br />
68'<br />
82'<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
79'<br />
FIGURE 14.39 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-limonene (68) <strong>and</strong> (-)-limonene (68¢) by Spodptera litura.<br />
(Modified from Miyazawa, M. et al., 1995a. Proc. 39th TEAC, pp. 362–363.)<br />
70'<br />
P. digitatum<br />
OH<br />
68<br />
34<br />
68'<br />
FIGURE 14.40 Microbial resolution <strong>of</strong> racemic limonene (68 <strong>and</strong> 68¢) <strong>and</strong> the formation <strong>of</strong> optically active<br />
a-terpineol by Penicillium digitatum. (Modified from Kieslich, K. et al., 1985. In: Topics in fl avor research,<br />
R.G. Berger, S. Nitz, <strong>and</strong> P. Schreier, eds, pp. 405–427. Marzling Hangenham: Eichborn.)
612 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
Cyanobacterium<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
+<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
69a<br />
71a 72<br />
O<br />
69a'<br />
FIGURE 14.41 Enantioselective biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (4S)- (69a¢) <strong>and</strong> (4R)-limonene epoxides (69a) by<br />
Cyanobacterium. (Modified from Hamada, H. et al., 2003. Proc. 47th TEAC, pp. 162–163.)<br />
O<br />
2 R<br />
1<br />
S<br />
O<br />
2 S<br />
1<br />
R<br />
O<br />
2 S<br />
1<br />
R<br />
O<br />
2 R<br />
1<br />
S<br />
R<br />
4<br />
R<br />
4<br />
S<br />
S<br />
4 4<br />
(1S,2R,4R)-(+)-trans<br />
(1R,2S,4R)-(+)-cis<br />
(1R,2S,4S)-(–)-trans<br />
(1S,2R,4S)-(–)-cis<br />
The mixture <strong>of</strong> (+)-trans- (69a) <strong>and</strong> cis- (69b), <strong>and</strong> the mixture <strong>of</strong> (-)-trans- (69a¢) <strong>and</strong> cislimonene-1,2-epoxide<br />
(69b¢) were biotransformed by Citrus pathogenic fungi, Penicillium digitatum<br />
(Pers.; Fr.) Sacc. KCPYN to give (1R,2R,4R)- (-)-trans-(71a) <strong>and</strong> (1S,2S,4S)-(+)-8-p-menthene-1,2-<br />
trans-diol (71a¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-p-menthane-1,2,8-triols (334a <strong>and</strong> 334a¢) (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 2007b)<br />
(Figure 14.42).<br />
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole (122) by Aspergillus niger gave racemic 2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole<br />
(125b <strong>and</strong> b¢) (Nishimura et al., 1982). When racemic 2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (125b <strong>and</strong> b¢)<br />
was biotransformed by Glomerella cingulata, only (-)-2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (125b¢) was selectively<br />
esterifized with malonic acid to give its malonate (125b¢-Mal). The malonate was hydrolyzed<br />
to give optical pure 125b¢ (Miyazawa et al., 1995b). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, Citrus pathogenic fungi,<br />
Penicillium digitatum, biotransformed limonene (68) to give optical pure 125b (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa,<br />
2007b) (Figure 14.43).<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
R<br />
R<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
R<br />
R<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
S<br />
S<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
S<br />
S<br />
R<br />
R<br />
S<br />
S<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
71a<br />
(1R,2R,4R)-(–)-trans<br />
334a<br />
(1R,2R,4R)-(–)-trans<br />
71a'<br />
(1S,2S,4S)-(+)-trans<br />
334a'<br />
(1S,2S,4S)-(+)-trans<br />
FIGURE 14.42 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-trans- (69a) <strong>and</strong> cis- (69b), <strong>and</strong> (-)-trans- (69a¢) <strong>and</strong> cis-limonene-<br />
1,2-epoxide (69b¢) by Citrus pathogenic fungi, Penicillium digitatum (Pers.; Fr.) Sacc. KCPYN <strong>and</strong> their<br />
metabolites. (Modified from Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2007b. Proc. 51st TEAC, pp. 299–301.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 613<br />
O<br />
122<br />
A. niger<br />
68<br />
P. digitatum<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
125b<br />
O<br />
125b'<br />
OH<br />
G. cingulata<br />
HO<br />
FIGURE 14.43 Formation <strong>of</strong> optical pure (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (125b <strong>and</strong> b¢) from the<br />
biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole (122) <strong>and</strong> (+)-limonene (68) by Citrus pathogenic fungi, Penicillium<br />
digitatum (Pers.; Fr.) Sacc. KCPYN <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2. (Modified from Nishimura, H. et al.,<br />
1982. Agric. Biol. Chem., 46: 2601–2604; Miyazawa, M. et al., 1995b. Proc. 39th TEAC, pp. 352–353; Noma,<br />
Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2007b. Proc. 51st TEAC, pp. 299–301.)<br />
When monoterpenes, such as limonene (68), a-pinene (4), <strong>and</strong> 3-carene (336), were administered<br />
to the cultured cells <strong>of</strong> Nicotiana tabacum, they were converted to the corresponding epoxides<br />
enantio- <strong>and</strong> stereoselectively. The enzyme (p38) concerning with the epoxidation reaction was purified<br />
from the cultured cells by cation exchanged chromatography. The enzyme had not only epoxidation<br />
activity but also peroxidase activity. Amino acid sequence <strong>of</strong> p38 showed 89% homology in their<br />
9 amino acid overlap with horseradish peroxidase (Yawata et al., 1998) (Figure 14.44). It was found<br />
that limonene <strong>and</strong> carene were converted to the corresponding epoxides in the presence <strong>of</strong> hydrogen<br />
O<br />
(1S, 2S, 4R)-125b<br />
[α] D +29.6<br />
+<br />
O<br />
O<br />
125b'-Mal<br />
Hydrolysis<br />
125b'<br />
OH<br />
H 2 O 2<br />
H2 O<br />
OH<br />
Peroxidase<br />
OH O 2<br />
O<br />
O<br />
. .<br />
O<br />
O<br />
68<br />
Polymerization<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
.<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
69<br />
FIGURE 14.44 Proposed mechanism for the epoxidation <strong>of</strong> (+)-limonene (68) with p38 from the cultured<br />
cells <strong>of</strong> Nicotiana tabacum. (Modified from Yawata, T. et al., 1998. Proc. 42nd TEAC, pp. 142–144.)<br />
.<br />
O
614 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
p38<br />
O O<br />
O<br />
p38<br />
+ +<br />
O<br />
68<br />
69a'<br />
10.7%<br />
69b'<br />
14.2%<br />
68'<br />
69b<br />
9.4%<br />
69a<br />
8.0%<br />
p38<br />
O<br />
p38<br />
O<br />
p38<br />
O<br />
4<br />
33<br />
trace<br />
4'<br />
335'<br />
trace<br />
337<br />
12.8%<br />
FIGURE 14.45 Epoxidation <strong>of</strong> limonene (68), a-pinene (4) <strong>and</strong> 3-carene (336) with p38 from the cultured<br />
cells <strong>of</strong> Nicotiana tabacum. (Modified from Yawata, T. et al., 1998. Proc. 42nd TEAC, pp. 142–144.)<br />
336<br />
peroxide <strong>and</strong> p-cresol by a radical mechanism with the peroxidase. (R)-limonene (68), (S)-limonene<br />
(68¢), (1S,5R)-a-pinene (4), (1R,5R)-a-pinene (4), <strong>and</strong> (1R,6R)-3-carene (336) were oxidized by<br />
cultured cells <strong>of</strong> Nicotiana tabacum to give corresponding epoxides enantio- <strong>and</strong> stereoselectively<br />
(Yawata et al., 1998) (Figure 14.45).<br />
14.3.1.2 Isolimonene<br />
Spodptera litura converted (1R)-trans-isolimonene (338) to (1R,4R)-p-menth-2-ene-8,9-diol (339)<br />
(Miyazawa et al., 1996b) (Figure 14.46).<br />
14.3.1.3 p-Menthane<br />
Hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> trans- <strong>and</strong> cis-p-menthane (252a <strong>and</strong> b) by microorganisms is also very interesting<br />
from the viewpoint <strong>of</strong> the formation <strong>of</strong> the important perfumes such as (-)-menthol (137b¢),<br />
(-)-carvomenthol (49b¢), etc., plant growth regulators, <strong>and</strong> mosquito repellents such as p-menthanetrans-3,8-diol<br />
(142a), p-menthane-cis-3,8-diol (142b) (Nishimura <strong>and</strong> Noma, 1996), <strong>and</strong> p-<br />
menthane-2,8-diol (93) (Noma, 2007). Pseudomonas mendocina strain SF biotransformed<br />
252b stereoselectively to p-cis-menthan-1-ol (253) (Tsukamoto et al., 1975) (Figure 14.47).<br />
On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> the mixture <strong>of</strong> p-trans- (252a) <strong>and</strong> cis-menthane (252b)<br />
(45:55, peak area in GC) by Aspergillus niger gave p-cis-menthane-1,9-diol (254) via p-cis-menthan-<br />
1-ol (253). No metabolite was obtained from 252a at all (Noma et al., 1990) (Figure 14.47).<br />
14.3.1.4 1-p-Menthene<br />
Concentrated cell suspension <strong>of</strong> Pseudomonas sp. strain (PL) was inoculated to the medium containing<br />
1-p-menthene (62) as the sole carbon source. It was degraded to give b-isopropyl pimelic<br />
acid (248) <strong>and</strong> methylisopropyl ketone (251) (Hungund et al., 1970) (Figure 14.48).<br />
S. litura<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
338<br />
339<br />
FIGURE 14.46 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (1R)-trans-isolimonene (338) by Spodoptera litura. (Modified from<br />
Miyazawa, M. et al., 1996b. Proc. 40th TEAC, pp. 80–81.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 615<br />
252a<br />
P. mendocina<br />
A. niger<br />
OH<br />
A. niger<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
25b2<br />
253<br />
254<br />
FIGURE 14.47 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> the mixture <strong>of</strong> trans- (252a) <strong>and</strong> cis-p-menthane (252b) by<br />
Pseudomonas mendocina SF <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2. (Modified from Tsukamoto, Y. et al., 1974.<br />
Proc. 18th TEAC, pp. 24–26; Tsukamoto, Y. et al., 1975. Agric. Biol. Chem., 39: 617–620; Noma, Y., 2007.<br />
Aromatic Plants from Asia their Chemistry <strong>and</strong> Application in Food <strong>and</strong> Therapy, L. Jiarovetz, N.X. Dung,<br />
<strong>and</strong> V.K. Varshney, pp. 169–186. Dehradun: Har Krishan Bhalla & Sons.)<br />
COOH<br />
Pseudomonas<br />
sp. strain (PL)<br />
COOH<br />
+<br />
O<br />
62 248<br />
251<br />
FIGURE 14.48 Biodegradation <strong>of</strong> (4R)-1-p-menthene (62) by Pseudomonas sp. strain (PL). (Modified from<br />
Hungund, B.L. et al., 1970. Indian J. Biochem., 7: 80–81.)<br />
S. litura<br />
COOH<br />
Cladosporiuum<br />
sp. T 1<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
62 65<br />
62' 54<br />
FIGURE 14.49 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (4R)-p-menth-1-ene (62) by Spodoptera litura <strong>and</strong> Cladosporium sp.<br />
T 1 . (Modified from Miyazawa, M. et al., 1996b. Proc. 40th TEAC, pp. 80–81; Mukherjee, B.B. et al., 1973.<br />
Appl. Microbiol., 25: 447–453.)<br />
As shown in Figure 14.49, Spodoptera litura converted (4R)-p-menth-1-ene (62) at C-7 position<br />
to (4R)-phell<strong>and</strong>ric acid (65) (Miyazawa et al., 1996b). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, when Cladosporium sp.<br />
T 1 was cultivated with (+)-limonene (68) as the sole carbon source, it converted 62¢ to transp-menthane-1,2-diol<br />
(54) (Mukherjee et al., 1973).<br />
14.3.1.5 3-p-Menthene<br />
When Cladosporium sp. T 8 was cultivated with 3-p-menthene (147) as the sole carbon source, it was<br />
converted to trans-p-menthane-3,4-diol (141) as shown in Figure 14.50 (Mukherjee et al., 1973).
616 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Cladosporiuum<br />
sp. T 8<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
147 141<br />
FIGURE 14.50 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> p-Menth-3-ene (147) by Cladosporium sp. T 8 . (Modified from<br />
Mukherjee, B.B. et al., 1973. Appl. Microbiol., 25: 447–453.)<br />
14.3.1.6 α-Terpinene<br />
a-Terpinene (340) was converted by Spodoptera litura to give a-terpinene-7-oic acid (341) <strong>and</strong><br />
p-cymene-7-oic acid (194, cuminic acid) (Miyazawa et al., 1995a) (Figure 14.51).<br />
A soil Pseudomonad has been found to grow with p-mentha-1,3-dien-7-al (463) as the sole carbon<br />
source <strong>and</strong> to produce a-terpinene-7-oic acid (341) in a mineral salt medium (Kayahara et al., 1973)<br />
(Figure 14.51).<br />
14.3.1.7 γ-Terpinene<br />
g-Terpinene (344) was converted by Spodoptera litura to give g-terpinene-7-oic acid (345) <strong>and</strong><br />
p-cymene-7-oic acid (194, cuminic acid) (Miyazawa et al., 1995a) (Figure 14.52).<br />
14.3.1.8 Terpinolene<br />
Terpinolene (346) was converted by Aspergillus niger to give (1R)-8-hydroxy-3-p-menthen-2-one<br />
(347), (1R)-1,8-dihydroxy-3-p-menthen-2-one (348), <strong>and</strong> 5b-hydroxyfenchol (350b¢). In case <strong>of</strong><br />
Corynespora cassiicola it was converted to terpinolene-1,2-trans-diol (351) <strong>and</strong> terpinolene-4,8-diol<br />
(352). Furthermore, in case <strong>of</strong> rabbit terpinolene-9-ol (353) <strong>and</strong> terpinolene-10-ol (354) were formed<br />
from 346 (Asakawa et al., 1983). Spodoptera litura also converted 346 to give 1-p-menthene-4,8-diol<br />
(352), cuminic acid (194, 29% main product), <strong>and</strong> terpinolene-7-oic acid (357) (Figure 14.53).<br />
14.3.1.9 α-Phell<strong>and</strong>rene<br />
a-Phell<strong>and</strong>rene (355) was converted by Spodoptera litura to give a-phell<strong>and</strong>rene-7-oic acid (356)<br />
<strong>and</strong> p-cymene-7-oic acid (194, cuminic acid) (Miyazawa et al., 1995a) (Figure 14.54).<br />
14.3.1.10 p-Cymene<br />
Pseudomonas sp. strain (PL) was cultivated with p-cymene (178) as the sole carbon source to give<br />
cumyl alcohol (192), cumic acid (194), 3-hydroxycumic acid (196), 2,3-dihydroxycumic acid (197),<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
S. litura<br />
+<br />
340 341 194<br />
CHO<br />
Pseudomonad<br />
463<br />
FIGURE 14.51 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> a-terpinene (340) by Spodoptera litura <strong>and</strong> p-mentha-1,3-dien-7-al<br />
(463) by a soil Pseudomonad. (Modified from Kayahara, H. et al., 1973. J. Ferment. Technol., 51: 254–259;<br />
Miyazawa, M. et al., 1995a. Proc. 39th TEAC, pp. 362–363.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 617<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
S. litura<br />
+<br />
344 345 194<br />
FIGURE 14.52 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> g-terpinene (344) by Spodoptera litura. (Modified from Miyazawa,<br />
M. et al., 1995a. Proc. 39th TEAC, pp. 362–363.)<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
352<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
A.n.<br />
O<br />
A.n.<br />
C. cassiicola<br />
S. litura<br />
351<br />
C. cassiicola<br />
348<br />
OH<br />
347<br />
OH<br />
Rabbit<br />
+<br />
OH<br />
A.n.<br />
346<br />
S. litura<br />
HO<br />
353 354<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
350b'<br />
357<br />
194<br />
FIGURE 14.53 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> terpinolene (346) by Aspergillus niger (Asakawa et al., 1991),<br />
Corynespora cassiicola (Abraham et al., 1985), rabbit (Asakawa et al., 1983), <strong>and</strong> Spodoptera litura. (Modified<br />
from Miyazawa, M. et al., 1995a. Proc. 39th TEAC, pp. 362–363.)<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
S. litura<br />
+<br />
355<br />
356 194<br />
FIGURE 14.54 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> a-phell<strong>and</strong>rene (355) by Spodoptera litura. (Modified from<br />
Miyazawa, M. et al., 1995a. Proc. 39th TEAC, pp. 362–363.)
618 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
2-oxo-4-methylpentanoic acid (201), 9-hydroxy-p-cymene (189), <strong>and</strong> p-cymene-9-oic acid (190) as<br />
shown in Figure 14.55 (Madyastha <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya, 1968). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, p-cymene (178)<br />
was converted regiospecifically to cumic acid (194) by Pseudomonas sp., Pseudomonas desmolytica,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Nocardia salmonicolor (Madyastha <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya, 1968) (Figure 14.56).<br />
p-Cymene (178) is converted to thymoquinone (358) <strong>and</strong> analogues, 179 <strong>and</strong> 180, by various<br />
kinds <strong>of</strong> microorganisms (Demirci et al., 2007) (Figure 14.57).<br />
CH 2<br />
OH CHO<br />
COOH COOH COOH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
178 192 193<br />
194<br />
196<br />
197<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
CH 2<br />
OH<br />
189 190 COOH<br />
FIGURE 14.55 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> p-cymene (178) by Pseudomonas sp. strain (PL). (Modified from<br />
Madyastha, K.M. <strong>and</strong> P.K. Bhattacharyya, 1968. Indian J. Biochem., 5: 161–167.)<br />
201<br />
COOH<br />
178 194<br />
FIGURE 14.56 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> p-cymene (178) to cumic acid (194) by Pseudomonas sp., Pseudomonas<br />
desmolytica <strong>and</strong> Nocardia salmonicolor. (Modified from Yamada, K. et al., 1965. Agric. Biol. Chem., 29:<br />
943–948; Madyastha, K.M. <strong>and</strong> P.K. Bhattacharyya, 1968. Indian J. Biochem., 5: 161–167; Noma, Y., 2000.<br />
unpublished data.)<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
178 179 180 358<br />
FIGURE 14.57 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> p-cymene (178) to thymoquinone (358) <strong>and</strong> analogues by microorganisms.<br />
(Modified from Demirci, F. et al., 2007. Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 38th ISEO, SL-1, p. 6.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 619<br />
14.3.2 MONOCYCLIC MONOTERPENE ALDEHYDE<br />
COOH<br />
CHO<br />
CH 2 OH CH 2 OH CH 2 OH<br />
CHO<br />
COOH<br />
HO<br />
360a<br />
1,2-dihydro<br />
perillic acid<br />
359a<br />
1,2-dihydroperillaldehde<br />
361a<br />
8-OH-s<br />
hisool<br />
75a<br />
1RS,4RS<br />
shisool<br />
74'<br />
(+)-4R<br />
perillyl<br />
alcohol<br />
78' (+)-4R<br />
perillaldehyde<br />
82'<br />
(+)-4R<br />
perillic<br />
acid<br />
COOH<br />
CHO<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CHO<br />
COOH<br />
HO<br />
360b<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
359b<br />
361b<br />
75b<br />
74 (–)-4S<br />
perillyl<br />
alcohol<br />
78 (–)-4S<br />
perillalde<br />
hyde<br />
82 (–)-4S<br />
perillic<br />
acid<br />
O<br />
77<br />
(–)-8,9-epoxy<br />
perillyl<br />
alcohol<br />
14.3.2.1 Perillaldehyde<br />
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-perillaldehyde (78), (+)-perillaldehyde (78¢), (-)-perillyl alcohol (74),<br />
trans-1,2-dihydroperillaldehyde (359a) <strong>and</strong> cis-1,2-dihydroperillaldehyde (359b), <strong>and</strong> trans-shisoic<br />
acid (360a) <strong>and</strong> cis-shisoic acid (360b) was carried out by Euglena gracilis Z. (Noma et al., 1991a),<br />
Dunaliella tertiolecta (Noma et al., 1991b, 1992a), Chlorella ellipsoidea IAMC-27 (Noma et al.,<br />
1997), Streptomyces ikutamanensis Ya-2-1 (Noma et al., 1984, 1986), <strong>and</strong> other microorganisms<br />
(Kayahara et al., 1973) (Figure 14.58).<br />
(-)-Perillaldehyde (78) is easily transformed to give (-)-perillyl alcohol (74) <strong>and</strong> trans-shisool<br />
(75a), which is well known as a fragrance, as the major product, <strong>and</strong> (-)-perillic acid (82) as the<br />
minor product. (-)-Perillyl alcohol (74) is also transformed to trans-shisool (75a) as the major product<br />
with cis-shisool (75b) <strong>and</strong> 8-hydroxy-cis-shisool (361b). Furthermore, trans-shisool (75a) <strong>and</strong><br />
cis-shisool (75b) are hydroxylated to 8-hydroxy-trans-shisool (361a) <strong>and</strong> 8-hydroxy-cis-shisool<br />
(361b), respectively. trans-1,2-Dihydroperillaldehyde (359a) <strong>and</strong> cis-1,2-dihydroperillaldehyde<br />
(359b) are also transformed to 75a <strong>and</strong> 75b as the major products <strong>and</strong> trans-shisoic acid (360a) <strong>and</strong><br />
cis-shisoic acid (360b) as the minor products, respectively. Compound 360a was also formed from<br />
75a. In the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (±)-perillaldehyde (74 <strong>and</strong> 74¢), the same results were obtained as<br />
described in the case <strong>of</strong> 74. In the case <strong>of</strong> Streptomyces ikutamanensis Ya-2-1, (-)-perillaldehyde<br />
(78) was converted to (-)-perillic acid (82), (-)-perillyl alcohol (74), <strong>and</strong> (-)-perillyl alcohol-8,9-<br />
epoxide (77) which was the major product.
620 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
COOH<br />
CHO<br />
360a<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
E.g.<br />
D.t.<br />
C.e.<br />
359a<br />
E.g. D.t. C.e.<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CHO<br />
COOH<br />
HO<br />
E.g.<br />
D.t.<br />
C.e.<br />
E.g.<br />
D.t.<br />
C.e.<br />
E.g.<br />
D.t.<br />
C.e.<br />
361a<br />
75a<br />
74' 78' 82'<br />
CH 2 OH CH 2 OH CH 2 OH<br />
CHO<br />
COOH<br />
HO<br />
E.g.<br />
D.t.<br />
C.e.<br />
E.g.<br />
D.t.<br />
C.e.<br />
E.g.<br />
D.t.<br />
C.e.<br />
361b<br />
COOH<br />
75b<br />
E.g.<br />
D.t. C.e.<br />
CHO<br />
74 78 82<br />
S.i. Ya21<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
O<br />
360b<br />
359b<br />
77<br />
FIGURE 14.58 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> perillaldehyde (78 <strong>and</strong> 78¢) by Euglena gracilis Z (Noma et al.,<br />
1991a), Dunaliella tertiolecta (Noma et al., 1991b; 1992a), Chlorella ellipsoidea IAMC-27 (Noma et al., 1997),<br />
Streptomyces ikutamanensis Ya-2-1 (Noma et al., 1984, 1986), a soil Pseudomonad (Kayahara et al., 1973), <strong>and</strong><br />
rabbit (Ishida et al., 1981a).<br />
A soil Pseudomonad has been found to grow with (-)-perillaldehyde (78) as the sole carbon<br />
source <strong>and</strong> to produce (-)-perillic acid (82) in a mineral salt medium (Kayahara et al., 1973).<br />
On the other h<strong>and</strong>, rabbit metabolized (-)-perillaldehyde (78) to (-)-perillic acid (82) along with<br />
minor shisool (75a) (Ishida et al., 1981a).<br />
14.3.2.2 Phell<strong>and</strong>ral <strong>and</strong> 1,2-Dihydrophell<strong>and</strong>ral<br />
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-phell<strong>and</strong>ral (64), trans-tetrahydroperillaldehyde (362a), <strong>and</strong> cis-tetrahydroperillaldehyde<br />
(362b) was carried out by microorganisms (Noma et al., 1986, 1991a, 1991b,<br />
1997). (-)-Phell<strong>and</strong>ral (64) was metabolized mainly via (-)-phell<strong>and</strong>rol (63) to trans-tetrahydroperillyl<br />
alcohol (66a). trans-Tetrahydroperillaldehyde (362a) <strong>and</strong> cis-tetrahydroperillaldehyde (362b) were<br />
also transformed to trans-tetrahydroperillyl alcohol (66a) <strong>and</strong> cis-tetrahydroperillyl alcohol (66b)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 621<br />
COOH<br />
CHO<br />
CH 2<br />
OH<br />
363a<br />
COOH<br />
362a<br />
CHO<br />
E.g.<br />
D.t.<br />
C.e.<br />
66a<br />
CH 2<br />
OH<br />
E.g.<br />
D.t.<br />
C.e.<br />
CH 2<br />
OH<br />
E.g.<br />
D.t.<br />
C.e.<br />
CHO<br />
63 64 65<br />
COOH<br />
E.g.<br />
D.t.<br />
C.e.<br />
363b<br />
362b<br />
66b<br />
FIGURE 14.59 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (-)-phell<strong>and</strong>ral (64) by microorganisms. (Modified from Noma, Y.<br />
et al., 1986. Proc. 30th TEAC, pp. 204–206; Noma, Y. et al., 1991a. Phytochem., 30: 1147–1151; Noma, Y.<br />
et al., 1991b. Proc. 35th TEAC, pp. 112–114; Noma, Y. et al., 1997. Proc. 41st TEAC, pp. 227–229.)<br />
as the major products <strong>and</strong> trans-tetrahydroperillic acid (363a) <strong>and</strong> cis-tetrahydro perillic acid (363b)<br />
as the minor products, respectively (Figure 14.59).<br />
14.3.2.3 Cuminaldehyde<br />
Cumin aldehyde (193) is transformed by Euglena (Noma et al., 1991a), Dunaliella (Noma et al.,<br />
1991b), <strong>and</strong> Streptomyces ikutamanensis (Noma et al., 1986) to give cumin alcohol (192) as the<br />
major product <strong>and</strong> cuminic acid (194) as the minor product (Figure 14.60).<br />
14.3.3 MONOCYCLIC MONOTERPENE ALCOHOL<br />
14.3.3.1 Menthol<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
137a<br />
(1R,3S,4S)<br />
(+)-Neomenthol<br />
137b<br />
(1R,3R,4S)<br />
(–)-Menthol<br />
137c<br />
(1S,3R,4S)<br />
(–)-Isomenthol<br />
137d<br />
(1S,3S,4S)<br />
(–)-Neoisomenthol<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
137a'<br />
(1S,3R,4R)<br />
(–)-Neomenthol<br />
137b'<br />
(1S,3S,4R)<br />
(+)-Menthol<br />
137c'<br />
(1R,3S,4R)<br />
(+)-Isomenthol<br />
137d'<br />
(1R,3R,4R)<br />
(+)-Neoisomenthol
622 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
CH 2 OH CHO COOH<br />
192 193 194<br />
FIGURE 14.60 Metabolic pathway <strong>of</strong> cumin aldehyde (193) by microorganism. (Modified from Noma, Y.<br />
et al., 1986. Proc. 30th TEAC, pp. 204–206; Noma, Y. et al., 1991a. Phytochem., 30: 1147–1151; Noma, Y.<br />
et al., 1991b. Proc. 35th TEAC, pp. 112–114.)<br />
Menthol (137) is one <strong>of</strong> the rare naturally occurring monocyclic monoterpene alcohols that have not<br />
only various physiological properties, such as sedative, anesthetic, antiseptic, gastric, <strong>and</strong> antipruritic,<br />
but also characteristic fragrance (Bauer et al., 1990). There are in fact eight isomers with a<br />
menthol (p-menthan-3-ol) skeleton; (-)-menthol (137b) is the most important one, because <strong>of</strong> its<br />
cooling <strong>and</strong> refreshing effect. It is the main component <strong>of</strong> peppermint <strong>and</strong> cornmint oils obtained<br />
from the Mentha piperita <strong>and</strong> Mentha arvensis species. Many attempts have been made to produce<br />
(-)-menthol (137b) from inexpensive terpenoid sources, but these sources also unavoidably yielded<br />
the (±)-isomers (137b <strong>and</strong> 137b¢): isomenthol (137c), neomenthol (137a), <strong>and</strong> neoisomenthol (137d)<br />
(Krasnobajew, 1984). Japanese researchers have been active in this field, maybe because <strong>of</strong> the large<br />
dem<strong>and</strong> for (-)-menthol (137b) in Japan itself, namely 500 t/year (Janssens et al., 1992). Indeed,<br />
most literature deals with the enantiomeric hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> (±)-menthol (137b <strong>and</strong> 137b¢) esters to<br />
optically pure l-menthol (137b). The asymmetric hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> (±)-menthyl chloroacetate by an<br />
esterase <strong>of</strong> Arginomonas non-fermentans FERM-P-1924 has been patented by the Japanese Nippon<br />
Terpene Chemical Co. (Watanabe <strong>and</strong> Inagaki, 1977a, 1977b). Investigators from the Takasago<br />
Perfumery Co. Ltd. claim that certain selected species <strong>of</strong> Absidia, Penicillium, Rhizopus,<br />
Trichoderma, Bacillus, Pseudomonas, <strong>and</strong> others asymmetrically hydrolyze esters <strong>of</strong> (±)-menthol<br />
isomers such as formates, acetates, propanoates, caproates, <strong>and</strong> esters <strong>of</strong> higher fatty acids (Moroe<br />
et al., 1971; Yamaguchi et al., 1977) (Figure 14.61).<br />
Numerous investigations into the resolution <strong>of</strong> the enantiomers by selective hydrolysis with microorganisms<br />
or enzymes were carried out. Good results were described by Yamaguchi et al. (1977) with<br />
the asymmetric hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> (±)-methyl acetate by a mutant <strong>of</strong> Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, yielding<br />
44 g <strong>of</strong> (-)-menthol (137b) form a 30% (±)-menthyl acetate mixture per liter <strong>of</strong> cultured medium for<br />
24 h. The latest development is the use <strong>of</strong> immobilized cells <strong>of</strong> Rhodotorula minuta in aqueous saturated<br />
organic solvents (Omata et al., 1981) (Figure 14.62).<br />
Besides the hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> menthyl esters, the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> menthol <strong>and</strong> its enantiomers has<br />
also been published (Shukla et al., 1987; Asakawa et al., 1991). The fungal biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-<br />
(137b) <strong>and</strong> (+)-menthols (137b¢) by Aspergillus niger <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus cellulosae was described<br />
microorgansims<br />
O-Ac<br />
O-Ac<br />
OH<br />
O-Ac<br />
137b-Ac<br />
137b'-Ac<br />
137b<br />
137b'-Ac<br />
FIGURE 14.61 Asymmetric hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> racemic menthyl acetate (137b-Ac <strong>and</strong> 137b¢-Ac) to obtain pure<br />
(-)-menthol (137b). (Modified from Watanabe, Y. <strong>and</strong> T. Inagaki, 1977a. Japanese Patent 77.12.989. No. 187696x;<br />
Watanabe, Y. <strong>and</strong> T. Inagaki, 1977b. Japanese Patent 77.122.690. No. 87656g; Moroe, T. et al., 1971. Japanese<br />
Patent, 2.036. 875. no. 98195t; Oritani, T. <strong>and</strong> Yamashita, K. 1973b. Agric. Biol. Chem., 37: 1695–1700.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 623<br />
137b-succinate<br />
O-COCH 2 CH 2 COOH<br />
Rodotrula<br />
minuta<br />
137b<br />
OH<br />
O-COCH 2 CH 2 COOH<br />
137b'-succinate<br />
FIGURE 14.62 Asymmetric hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> racemic menthyl succinate (137b- <strong>and</strong> 137b¢-succinates) to obtain<br />
pure (-)-menthol (137b). (Modified from Yamaguchi, Y. et al., 1977. J. Agric. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 51: 411–416,)<br />
(Asakawa et al., 1991). Aspergillus niger converted (-)-menthol (137b) to 1- (138b), 2- (140b), 6- (139b),<br />
7- (143b), 9-hydroxymenthols (144b), <strong>and</strong> the mosquito repellent-active 8-hydroxymenthol (142b),<br />
whereas (+)-menthol (137b¢) was smoothly biotransformed by the same microorganism to 7-hydroxymenthol<br />
(143b). The bioconversion <strong>of</strong> (+)- (137a¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-neomenthol (137a) <strong>and</strong> (+)-isomenthol<br />
(137c¢) by Aspergillus niger was studied later by Takahashi et al. (1994), mainly giving hydroxylated<br />
products. Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa (1995) reviewed the schematic menthol hydroxylation in detail.<br />
Incubation <strong>of</strong> (-)-menthol (137b) with Cephalosporium aphidicola for 12 days yielded 10-<br />
acetoxymenthol (144bb-Ac), 1a-hydroxymenthol (138b), 6a-hydroxy- menthol (139bb), 7-hydroxymenthol<br />
(143b), 9-hydroxymenthol (144ba), <strong>and</strong> 10-hydroxymenthol (144bb) (Atta-ur-Rahman<br />
et al., 1998) (Figure 14.63).<br />
Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 converted (-)-menthol (137b) to 1a- (138b), 2a- (140b), 4b- (141b),<br />
6a- (139bb), 7- (143b)-, 9-hydroxymenthols (144ba), <strong>and</strong> the mosquito repellent-active 8-hydroxymenthol<br />
(142b) (Figure 14.64). Aspergillus cellulosae M-77 biotransformed (-)-menthol (137b)<br />
to 4b-hydroxymenthol (141b) predominantly. The formation <strong>of</strong> 141b is also observed in<br />
Aspergillus cellulosae IFO 4040 <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus terreus IFO 6123, but its yield is much less than<br />
that obtained from 137b by Aspergillus cellulosae M-77 (Asakawa et al., 1991) (Table 14.1).<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
+ +<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
C. aphidicola<br />
O-COCH 3<br />
144bb-Ac 143b 139bb<br />
OH<br />
137b<br />
OH<br />
+ +<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
144bb<br />
OH<br />
138b<br />
HO<br />
144ba<br />
FIGURE 14.63 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-menthol (137b) by Cephalosporium aphidicola. (Modified from<br />
Atta-ur-Rahman, M. et al., 1998. J. Nat. Prod., 61: 1340–1342.)
624 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
138b<br />
OH<br />
143b<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
142b<br />
7<br />
6<br />
1 2<br />
5 4<br />
3<br />
OH<br />
8<br />
9<br />
137b<br />
10<br />
140bb<br />
HO<br />
139bb<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
142b<br />
OH<br />
144ba<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 14.64 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (-)-menthol (137b) by Aspergillus niger. (Modified from Asakawa, Y.<br />
et al., 1991. Phytochemistry, 30: 3981–3987.)<br />
On the other h<strong>and</strong>, (+)-menthol (137b¢) was smoothly biotransformed by Aspergillus niger to<br />
give 1b-hydroxymenthol (138b¢), 6b-hydroxymenthol (139ba¢), 2b-hydroxymenthol (140ba¢),<br />
4a-hydroxymenthol (141b¢), 7-hydroxymenthol (143b¢), 8-hydroxymenthol (142b¢), <strong>and</strong> 9-hydroxymenthol<br />
(144ba¢) (Figure 14.65) (Table 14.2).<br />
Spodoptera litura converted (-)- <strong>and</strong> (+)-menthols (137b <strong>and</strong> 137b¢) gave the corresponding<br />
10-hydroxy products (143b <strong>and</strong> 143b¢) (Miyazawa et al., 1997a) (Figure 14.66).<br />
TABLE 14.1<br />
Metabolites <strong>of</strong> (−)-Menthol (137b) by Various Aspergillus spp. (Static Culture)<br />
Microorganisms 138b 142b 139bb 143b 139bb 144ba 141b<br />
A. awamori IFO 4033 + a ++ − + ++ +++ −<br />
A. fumigatus IFO 4400 − + − + + + −<br />
A. sojae IFO 4389 ++ + + − − ++++ −<br />
A. usami IFO 4338 − − − + − +++ −<br />
A. cellulosae M-77 + − − + − ++ ++++<br />
A. cellulosae IFO 4040 − + − − − ++ ++<br />
A. terreus IFO 6123 + + + − + + −<br />
A. niger IFO 4049 − + − + − +++ −<br />
A. niger IFO 4040 − + − +++ − +++ −<br />
A. niger TBUYN-2 + ++ + + ++ ++ −<br />
a<br />
Symbols +, ++, +++, etc. are relative concentrations estimated by GC-MS.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 625<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
138b'<br />
OH<br />
143b'<br />
7<br />
140ba'<br />
6<br />
1<br />
2<br />
HO<br />
141b'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
5 4<br />
3<br />
OH<br />
8<br />
9<br />
137b'<br />
10<br />
139ba'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
142b'<br />
144ba'<br />
FIGURE 14.65 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (+)-menthol (137b¢) by Aspergillus niger. (Modified from Noma, Y.<br />
et al., 1989. Proc. 33rd TEAC, pp. 124–126; Asakawa, Y. et al., 1991. Phytochemistry, 30: 3981–3987.)<br />
(-)-Menthol (137b) was glycosylated by Eucalyptus perriniana suspension cells to (-)-menthol<br />
diglucoside (364, 26.6%) <strong>and</strong> another menthol glycoside. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, (+)-menthol (137b¢)<br />
was glycosylated by Eucalyptus perriniana suspension cells to (+)-menthol di- (364¢, 44.0%) <strong>and</strong><br />
triglucosides (365, 6.8%) (Hamada et al., 2002) (Figure 14.67).<br />
TABLE 14.2<br />
Metabolites <strong>of</strong> (+)-Menthol (137b¢) by Various Aspergillus spp. (Static Culture)<br />
Microorganisms 138b¢ 142b¢ 140ba¢ 143b¢ 139ba¢ 144ba¢ 141b¢<br />
A. awamori IFO 4033 + a ++ – +++ – +++ –<br />
A. fumigatus IFO 4400 + ++ – + – ++ –<br />
A. sojae IFO 4389 + ++ – – – +++ –<br />
A. usami IFO 4338 + – – + – +++ –<br />
A. cellulosae M-77 – + – – – ++ ++++<br />
A. cellulosae IFO 4040 + + – – ++ + +<br />
A. terreus IFO 6123 + +++ + + + ++ –<br />
A. niger IFO 4049 + – – – + +++ –<br />
A. niger IFO 4040 + ++ – + – ++ –<br />
A. niger TBUYN-2 ++ + – +++++ + + –<br />
a<br />
Symbols +, ++, +++, etc. are relative concentrations estimated by GC-MS.
626 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
S. litura<br />
S. litura<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
137b<br />
143b<br />
FIGURE 14.66 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)- (137b) <strong>and</strong> (+)-menthol (137b¢) by Spodoptera litura. (Modified<br />
from Miyazawa, M. et al., 1997a. Proc. 41st TEAC, pp. 391–392.)<br />
137b'<br />
143b'<br />
OH<br />
E. perriniana<br />
+<br />
O- 1' Glc 6' - 1'' Glc<br />
Another menthol glycoside<br />
137b 364<br />
OH<br />
E. perriniana<br />
+<br />
O- 1' Glc 6' - 1'' Glc<br />
O- 1' 2' Glc6' - 1'' Glc<br />
1''' Glc<br />
137b'<br />
364' 365<br />
FIGURE 14.67 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)- (137b) <strong>and</strong> (+)-menthol (137b¢) by Eucalyptus perriniana suspension<br />
cells. (Modified from Hamada, H. et al., 2002. Proc. 46th TEAC, pp. 321–322.)<br />
Human CYP2A6<br />
Human CYP2A6<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
137b<br />
142b<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 14.68 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-menthol (137b) <strong>and</strong> its enantiomer (137b¢) by human CYP 2A6.<br />
(Modified from Nakanishi, K. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2005. Proc. 49th TEAC, pp. 423–425.)<br />
137b'<br />
142b'<br />
OH<br />
(-)-Menthol (137b) <strong>and</strong> its enantiomer (137b¢) were converted to their corresponding 8-hydroxy<br />
derivatives (142b <strong>and</strong> 142b¢) by human CYP 2A6 (Nakanishi <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 2005) (Figure 14.68).<br />
By various assays, cytochrome P450 molecular species responsible for the metabolism <strong>of</strong> (-)- (137b)<br />
<strong>and</strong> (+)-menthol (137b¢) was determined to be CYP 2A6 <strong>and</strong> CYP2B1 in human <strong>and</strong> rat, respectively.<br />
Also, kinetic analysis showed that K, <strong>and</strong> V max values for the oxidation <strong>of</strong> (-)- (137b) <strong>and</strong> (+)-menthol<br />
(137b¢) recombinant CYP2A6 <strong>and</strong> CYP2B1 were determined to be 28 mM <strong>and</strong> 10.33 nmol/min/nmol<br />
P450 <strong>and</strong> 27 mM, 5.29 nmol/min/nmol P450, 28 mM <strong>and</strong> 3.58 nmol/min/nmol P450, <strong>and</strong> 33 mM <strong>and</strong><br />
5.3 nmol/min/nmol P450, respectively (Nakanishi <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 2005) (Figure 14.68).
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 627<br />
14.3.3.2 Neomenthol<br />
(+)-Neomenthol (137a) is biotransformed by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 to give five kinds <strong>of</strong> diols<br />
(138a, 143a, 144aa, 144ab, <strong>and</strong> 142a) <strong>and</strong> two kinds <strong>of</strong> triols (145a <strong>and</strong> 146a) as shown in<br />
Figure 14.69 (Takahashi et al., 1994).<br />
(-)-Neomenthol (137a¢) is biotransformed by Aspergillus niger to give six kinds <strong>of</strong> diols (140a¢,<br />
139a¢, 143a¢, 144aa¢, 144ab¢, <strong>and</strong> 142a¢) <strong>and</strong> a triol (146a¢) as shown in Figure 14.70 (Takahashi<br />
et al., 1994).<br />
14.3.3.3 (+)-Isomenthol<br />
(+)-Isomenthol (137c) is biotransformed to give two kinds <strong>of</strong> diols such as 1b-hydroxy- (138c) <strong>and</strong><br />
6b-hydroxyisomenthol (139c) by Aspergillus niger (Takahashi et al., 1994) (Figure 14.71).<br />
(±)-Isomenthyl acetate (137c-Ac <strong>and</strong> 137c¢-Ac) was asymmetrically hydrolyzed to (-)-iso menthol<br />
(137c) with (+)-isomenthol acetate (137c¢-Ac) by many microorganisms <strong>and</strong> esterases (Oritani <strong>and</strong><br />
Yamashita, 1973b) (Figure 14.72).<br />
14.3.3.4 Isopulegol<br />
(-)-Isopulegol (366) was biotransformed by Spodoptera litura larvae to give 7-hydroxy-(-)-isopulegol<br />
(367), 9-hydroxy-(-)-menthol (144ba) <strong>and</strong> 10-hydroxy-(-)-isopulegol (368). On the other<br />
h<strong>and</strong>, (+)-isopulegol (366¢) was biotransformed by the same larvae in the same manner to give<br />
7-hydroxy-(+)-isopulegol (367¢), 9-hydroxy-(+)-menthol (144ba¢), <strong>and</strong> 10-hydroxy-(+)-isopulegol<br />
(368¢) (Ohsawa <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 2001) (Figure 14.73).<br />
Microbial resolution <strong>of</strong> (±)-isopulegyl acetate (366-Ac <strong>and</strong> 366¢-Ac) was studied by microorganisms.<br />
(±)-Isopulegyl acetate (366-Ac <strong>and</strong> 366¢-Ac) was hydrolyzed asymmetrically to give a mixture<br />
<strong>of</strong> (-)-isopulegol (366) <strong>and</strong> (+)-isopulegyl acetate (366¢-Ac) (Oritani <strong>and</strong> Yamashita, 1973c)<br />
(Figure 14.74).<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
146a<br />
OH<br />
138a<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
145a<br />
142a<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
7<br />
6 1<br />
2<br />
5<br />
3<br />
4<br />
OH<br />
8<br />
9<br />
137a<br />
10<br />
HO<br />
144aa<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
143a<br />
144ab<br />
FIGURE 14.69 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (+)-neomenthol (137a) by Aspergillus niger. (Modified from<br />
Takahashi, H. et al., 1994. Phytochemistry, 35: 1465–1467.)
628 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
146a'<br />
138a'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
143a'<br />
6<br />
7<br />
1 2<br />
5 4<br />
3<br />
OH<br />
8<br />
9<br />
137a'<br />
10<br />
140a'<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
139a'<br />
OH<br />
142a'<br />
HO<br />
144ab'<br />
144aa'<br />
FIGURE 14.70 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (-)-neomenthol (137a¢) by Aspergillus niger. (Modified from<br />
Takahashi, H. et al., 1994. Phytochemistry, 35: 1465–1467.)<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
139c<br />
137c<br />
138c<br />
FIGURE 14.71 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (+)-isomenthol (137c) by Aspergillus niger. (Modified from<br />
Takahashi, H. et al., 1994. Phytochemistry, 35: 1465–1467.)<br />
Microorgansims<br />
O-Ac<br />
O-Ac<br />
OH<br />
O-Ac<br />
137c-Ac<br />
137c'-Ac<br />
137c<br />
137c'-Ac<br />
FIGURE 14.72 Microbial resolution <strong>of</strong> (±)-isomenthyl acetate (137c-Ac <strong>and</strong> 137c¢-Ac) by microbial esterase.<br />
(Modified from Oritani, T. <strong>and</strong> Yamashita, K. 1973b. Agric. Biol. Chem., 37: 1695–1700.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 629<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
S. litura<br />
OH<br />
+ +<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
366<br />
367<br />
OH<br />
144ba<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
368<br />
OH<br />
S. litura<br />
OH<br />
+ +<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
366'<br />
367'<br />
144ba'<br />
FIGURE 14.73 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)- (366) <strong>and</strong> (+)-isopulegol (366¢) by Spodoptera litura. (Modified<br />
from Ohsawa, M. <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, M. 2001. Proc. 45th TEAC, pp. 375–376.)<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
368'<br />
OAc<br />
OAc<br />
OH<br />
OAc<br />
366-Ac<br />
366'-Ac<br />
FIGURE 14.74 Microbial resolution <strong>of</strong> (±)-isopulegyl acetate (366-Ac <strong>and</strong> 366¢-Ac) by microorganisms.<br />
(Modified from Oritani, T. <strong>and</strong> K. Yamashita, 1973c. Agric. Biol. Chem., 37: 1687–1689.)<br />
366<br />
366'-Ac<br />
14.3.3.5 α-Terpineol<br />
Pseudomonas pseudomonalli strain T was cultivated with a-terpineol (34) as the sole carbon source<br />
to give 8,9-epoxy-p-menthan-1-ol (58) via epoxide (369) <strong>and</strong> diepoxide (57) as intermediates<br />
(Hayashi et al., 1972) (Figure 14.75).<br />
(+)-a-Terpineol (34) was formed from (+)-limonene (34) by Citrus pathogenic Pencillium digitatum<br />
(Pers.; Fr.) Sacc. KCPYN, which was further biotransformed to p-menthane-1b,2a,8-triol<br />
(334), 2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (125b), <strong>and</strong> (+)-trans-sobrerol (95a) (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa 2006a,<br />
2007a) (Figure 14.76). Penicillium sp. YuzuYN also biotransformed 34 to 334. Furthermore,<br />
Aspergillus niger Tiegh, CBAYN <strong>and</strong> Catharanthus roseus biotransformed 34 to give 95a <strong>and</strong><br />
(+)-oleuropeyl alcohol (204), respectively (Hamada et al., 2001; Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa 2006a, 2007a)<br />
(Figure 14.76).<br />
Gibberella cyanea DSM 62719 biotransformed (-)-a-terpineol (34¢) to give p-menthane-1-<br />
b,2a,8-triol (334¢), 2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (125b¢), 1,2-epoxy-a-terpineol (369¢), (-)-oleuropeyl<br />
alcohol (204¢), (-)-trans-sobrerol (95a¢), <strong>and</strong> cis-sobrerol (95b¢) (Abraham et al., 1986) (Figure<br />
14.76). In cases <strong>of</strong> Pencillium digitatum (Pers. Fr.) Sacc. KCPYN, Penicillium sp. YuzuYN,<br />
Aspergillus niger Tiegh, CBAYN 34¢ was biotransformed to give 369¢, 95a¢, <strong>and</strong> 334¢, respectively<br />
(Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa 2006a, 2007a) (Figure 14.77). Catharanthus roseus biotransformed 34¢ to give<br />
95a¢ <strong>and</strong> 204¢ (Hamada et al., 2001) (Figure 14.77).
630 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
34,<br />
4R-(+)<br />
34',<br />
4S-(–)<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
P. pseudomonalli<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
34<br />
369<br />
57 58<br />
FIGURE 14.75 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-a-terpineol (34) to 8,9-epoxy-p-menthan-1-ol (58) by Pseudomonas<br />
pseudomonalli strain T. (Modified from Hayashi, T. et al., 1972. Biol. Chem., 36: 690–691.)<br />
P. digitatum<br />
P. digitatum HO<br />
Yuzu Penicillium<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
68<br />
OH<br />
A. niger Tiegh<br />
C. roses<br />
34<br />
A. niger Tiegh<br />
P. digitatum<br />
C. roses<br />
P. digitatum<br />
HO<br />
334<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
204<br />
95a<br />
OH<br />
125b<br />
FIGURE 14.76 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-a-terpineol (34) by Citrus pathogenic fungi, Pencillium digitatum<br />
(Pers.; Fr.) Sacc. KCPYN, Penicillium sp. YuzuYN, Aspergillus niger Tiegh, CBAYN. (Modified from<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2006a. Proc. 50th TEAC, pp. 431–433; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2007a. Book <strong>of</strong><br />
Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 38th ISEO, p. 7.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 631<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
G. cyanea<br />
P. digitatum<br />
G. cyanea<br />
125b'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
369'<br />
OH<br />
Yuzu Penicillium<br />
G. cyanea<br />
OH<br />
G. cyanea<br />
C. roses<br />
OH<br />
34'<br />
A. niger Tiegh<br />
G. cyanea G. cyanea<br />
C. roses<br />
334'<br />
OH<br />
204'<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
95b'<br />
OH<br />
95a'<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 14.77 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-a-terpineol (34¢) by Gibberella cyanea DSM 62719, Pencillium<br />
digitatum (Pers. Fr.) Sacc. KCPYN, Penicillium sp. Yuzu YN, Aspergillus niger Tiegh, CBAYN. (Modified<br />
from Abraham, W.-R. et al., 1986. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 24: 24–30; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2006a.<br />
Proc. 50th TEAC, pp. 431–433; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2007a. Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 38th ISEO, p. 7.)<br />
14.3.3.6 (-)-Terpinen-4-ol<br />
342,<br />
4S-(+)<br />
OH<br />
342',<br />
4R-(–)<br />
OH<br />
Gibberella cyanea DSM 62719 biotransformed (S)-(-)-terpinen-4-ol (342) (1-p-menthen-4-ol) to<br />
give 2a-hydroxy-1,4-cineole (132b), 1-p-menthene-4a,6-diol (372), <strong>and</strong> p-menthane-1b,2a,4atriol<br />
(371) (Abraham et al., 1986). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 also biotransformed<br />
(-)-terpinen-4-ol (342) to give 2a-hydroxy-1,4-cineole (132b) <strong>and</strong> (+)-p-menthane-1b,2a,4a-triol<br />
(371) (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa 2007b) (Figure 14.78). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, Spodoptera litura biotransformed<br />
(R)-terpinen-4-ol (342¢) to (4R)-p-menth-1-en-4,7-diol (373¢) (Kumagae <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 1999)<br />
(Figure 14.78).<br />
14.3.3.7 Thymol <strong>and</strong> Thymol Methyl Ether<br />
Thymol (179) was converted at the concentration <strong>of</strong> 14% by Streptomyces humidus, Tu-1 to give<br />
(1R,2S)- (181a) <strong>and</strong> (1R,2R)-2-hydroxy-3-p-menthen-5-one (181b) as the major products (Noma<br />
et al., 1988a) (Figure 14.79). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, in a Pseudomonas, thymol (179) was biotransformed<br />
to 6-hydroxy- (180), 7-hydroxy- (479), 9-hydroxy- (480), 7,9-dihydroxythymol (482), thymol-7-oic<br />
acid (481), <strong>and</strong> thymol-9-oic acid (483) (Chamberlain <strong>and</strong> Dagley, 1968) (Figure 14.79).
632 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
G. cyanea<br />
A. niger<br />
+ +<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
342 371 372<br />
132b<br />
OH<br />
S. litura<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
342'<br />
373'<br />
FIGURE 14.78 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-terpinen-4-ol (342) by Gibberella cyanea DSM 62719, Aspergillus<br />
niger TBUYN-2, <strong>and</strong> Spodoptera litura. (Modified from Abraham, W.-R. et al., 1986. Appl. Microbiol.<br />
Biotechnol., 24: 24–30; Kumagae, S. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 1999. Proc. 43rd TEAC, pp. 389–390; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong><br />
Y. Asakawa, 2007b. Proc. 51st TEAC, pp. 299–301.)<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
S. humidus,<br />
Tu-1<br />
O<br />
+<br />
O<br />
180<br />
179 181a 181b<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
481 479 480 483<br />
482<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
OMe<br />
fungus<br />
+<br />
OMe<br />
OMe<br />
459<br />
460<br />
461<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 14.79 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> thymol (179) <strong>and</strong> thymol methyl ether (459) by actinomycetes Streptomyces<br />
humidus, Tu-1 <strong>and</strong> fungi Aspergillus niger, Mucor ramannianus, Rhizopus arrhizus, <strong>and</strong> Trichothecium<br />
roseum. (Modified from Chamberlain, E.M. <strong>and</strong> S. Dagley, 1968. Biochem. J., 110: 755–763; Noma, Y. et al.,<br />
1988a. Proc. 28th TEAC, pp. 177–179; Demirci, F. et al., 2001. XII Biotechnology Congr., Book <strong>of</strong> abstracts, p. 47.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 633<br />
Thymol methyl ether (459) was converted by fungi, Aspergillus niger, Mucor ramannianus,<br />
Rhizopus arrhizus, <strong>and</strong> Trichothecium roseum to give 7-hydroxy- (460) <strong>and</strong> 9-hydroxythymol<br />
methyl ether (461) (Demirci et al., 2001) (Figure 14.79).<br />
14.3.3.8 Carvacrol <strong>and</strong> Carvacrol Methyl Ether<br />
When cultivated in a liquid medium with carvacrol (191), as a sole carbon source, the bacterial<br />
isolated from savory <strong>and</strong> pine consumed the carvacrol in the range <strong>of</strong> 19–22% within 5 days <strong>of</strong><br />
cultivation. The fungal isolates grew much slower <strong>and</strong> after 13 days <strong>of</strong> cultivation consumed<br />
7.1–11.4% carvacrol (191). Pure strains belonging to the bacterial genera <strong>of</strong> Bacterium, Bacillus<br />
<strong>and</strong> Pseudomonas as well as fungal strain from Aspergillus, Botrytis, <strong>and</strong> Geotrichum genera,<br />
were also tested for their ability to grow in medium containing carvacrol (191). Among them,<br />
only in Bacterium sp. <strong>and</strong> Pseudomonas sp. Carvacrol (191) uptake was monitored. Both<br />
Pseudomonas sp. 104 <strong>and</strong> 107 consumed the substrate in the amount <strong>of</strong> 19%. These two strains<br />
also exhibited the highest cell mass yield <strong>and</strong> the highest productivity (1.1 <strong>and</strong> 1.2 g/L per day)<br />
(Schwammle et al., 2001).<br />
Carvacrol (191) was biotransformed to 3-hydroxy- (470), 9-hydroxy (471), 7-hydroxy- (475), <strong>and</strong><br />
8-hydroxycarvacrol (474), 8,9-dehydrocarvacrol (473), carvacrol-9-oic acid (472), carvacrol-7-oic<br />
acid (476), <strong>and</strong> 8,9-dihydroxycarvacrol (477) by rats (Ausgulen et al., 1987) <strong>and</strong> microorganisms<br />
(Demirci, 2000) including Trichothecium roseum <strong>and</strong> Cladosporium sp. (Figure 14.80). Furthermore,<br />
carvacrol methyl ether (191-Me) was converted by the same fungi to give 7-hydroxy- (475-Ac) <strong>and</strong><br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
Cladosporium sp.<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
470 191 471 472<br />
T. roseum<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
473<br />
474<br />
476 475<br />
477<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OMe<br />
OMe<br />
OMe<br />
OMe<br />
+ +<br />
191-Me<br />
OH<br />
475-Me 471-Me<br />
478<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 14.80 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> carvacrol (191) <strong>and</strong> carvacrol methyl ether (191-Me) by rats (Modified<br />
from Ausgulen, L.T. et al., 1987. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 61: 98–102) <strong>and</strong> microorganisms (Modified from<br />
Demirci, F., 2000. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> bioactive monoterpenes. Ph.D. thesis, pp. 1–137. Anadolu<br />
University, Eskisehir, Turkey).
634 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
9-hydroxycarvacrol methyl ether (471-Me) <strong>and</strong> 7,9-dihydroxycarvacrol methyl ether (478) (Demirci,<br />
2000) (Figure 14.80).<br />
14.3.3.9 Carveol<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
81a<br />
81b<br />
81a'<br />
81b'<br />
At first, soil Pseudomonad biotransformed (+)-limonene (68) to (+)-carvone (93) <strong>and</strong> (+)-1-pmenthene-6,9-diol<br />
(90) via (+)-cis-carveol (81b) as shown in Figure 14.81 (Dhavalikar <strong>and</strong><br />
Bhattacharyya, 1966; Dhavalikar et al., 1966).<br />
Secondary, Pseudomonas ovalis, strain 6-1 (Noma, 1977) biotransformed the mixture <strong>of</strong> (-)-ciscarveol<br />
(81b¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-trans-carveol (81a¢) (94:6, GC ratio) to (-)-carvone (93’) (Noma, 1977),<br />
which was further metabolized reductively to give (+)-dihydrocarvone (101a¢), (+)-isodihydrocarvone<br />
(101b¢), (+)-neodihydrocarveol (102a), <strong>and</strong> (-)-dihydrocarveol (102b) (Noma et al., 1984).<br />
Hydrogenation at C1, 2-position did not occur, but the dehydrogenation at C6-position occured to<br />
give (-)-carvone (93) (Figure 14.82).<br />
On the other h<strong>and</strong>, in Streptomyces, A-5-1 <strong>and</strong> Nocardia, 1-3-11, which were isolated from<br />
soil, (-)-carvone (93¢) was reduced to give mainly (-)-trans-carveol (81a¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-cis-carveol<br />
(81b¢), respectively. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, (-)-trans-carveol (81a¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-cis-carveol (81b¢) were<br />
dehydrogenated to give 93¢ by strain 1-3-11 <strong>and</strong> other microorganisms (Noma et al., 1986). The<br />
reaction between trans- <strong>and</strong> cis-carveols (81a¢ <strong>and</strong> 81b¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-carvone (93¢) is reversible<br />
(Noma, 1980) (Figure 14.82).<br />
Thirdly, the investigation for the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> the mixture <strong>of</strong> (-)-trans- (81a¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-ciscarveol<br />
(81b¢) (60:40 in GC ratio) was carried out by using 81 strains <strong>of</strong> soil actinomycetes. All<br />
actinomycetes produced (-)-carvone (93¢) from the mixture <strong>of</strong> (-)-trans- (81a¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-cis-carveol<br />
(81b¢) (60:40 in GC ratio). However, 41 strains <strong>of</strong> actinomycetes converted (-)-cis-carveol (81b¢) to<br />
give (4R,6R)-(+)-6,8-oxidomenth-1-en-9-ol (92a¢), which is named as bottrospicatol after the name<br />
<strong>of</strong> the microorganism, Streptomyces bottropensis ÈBottro˚, <strong>and</strong> (-)-cis-carveol (81b¢) containing<br />
Mentha spicata Èspicat˚ <strong>and</strong> alcohol Èol˚ (Nishimura et al., 1983a) (Figure 14.83).<br />
(+)-Bottrospicatol (92a¢) was prepared by epoxidation <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvone (93¢) with mCPBA to<br />
(-)-carvone-8,9-epoxide (96¢), followed by stereoselective reduction with NaBH 4 to alcohol, which<br />
was immediately cyclized with 0.1 N H 2 SO 4 to give diastereo mixture <strong>of</strong> bottrospicatol (92a¢ <strong>and</strong> b¢)<br />
(Nishimura et al., 1983a) (Figure 14.84).<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
93<br />
68<br />
81b<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
90<br />
FIGURE 14.81 Proposed metabolic pathway <strong>of</strong> (+)-limonene (68) <strong>and</strong> (+)-cis-carveol (81b) by soil<br />
Pseudomonad. (Modified from Dhavalikar, R.S. <strong>and</strong> P.K. Bhattacharyya, 1966. Indian J. Biochem., 3: 144–157;<br />
Dhavalikar, R.S. et al., 1966. Indian J. Biochem., 3: 158–164.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 635<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
P. ovalis P. ovalis<br />
OH<br />
81a'<br />
93' 81b'<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
Streptomyces<br />
Nocardia<br />
81a'<br />
93' 81b'<br />
FIGURE 14.82 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-trans- (81a¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-cis-carveol (81b¢) (6:94, GC ratio) by<br />
Pseudomonas ovalis, strain 6-1, Streptomyces , A-5-1, <strong>and</strong> Nocardia, 1-3-11. (Modified from Noma, Y., 1977.<br />
Nippon Nogeikagaku Kaishi, 51: 463–470; Noma, Y., 1980. Agric. Biol. Chem., 44: 807–812.)<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
81a' & b'<br />
93'<br />
OH<br />
81a' & b'<br />
92a'<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 14.83 The Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> cis-carveol (81b¢) by Pseudomonas ovalis, strain 6-1 (Modified<br />
from Noma, Y., 1977. Nippon Nogeikagaku Kaishi, 51: 463–470) <strong>and</strong> Streptomyces bottropensis SY-2-1 <strong>and</strong><br />
other microorganisms (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1982. Agric. Biol. Chem., 46: 2871–2872; Nishimura, H.<br />
et al., 1983a. Proc. 27th TEAC, pp. 107–109).<br />
O<br />
mCPBA<br />
O<br />
NaBH 4<br />
OH<br />
H +<br />
92a'<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
93'<br />
96'<br />
91b'<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
92b'<br />
FIGURE 14.84 Preparation <strong>of</strong> (+)-bottrospicatol (92a¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)-isobottrospicatol (92b¢) from (-)-carvone (93¢)<br />
with mCPBA. (Modified from Nishimura, H. <strong>and</strong> Y. Noma, 1996. Biotechnology for Improved Foods <strong>and</strong> Flavors,<br />
G.R. Takeoka, et al., ACS Symp. Ser. 637, pp. 173–187. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.)
636 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
100aa'<br />
98a'<br />
93'<br />
81a'<br />
HO<br />
92b'<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
96'<br />
HO<br />
94ba'<br />
FIGURE 14.85 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-trans- (81a¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-cis-carveol (81b¢) by Streptomyces bottropensis<br />
SY-2-1 <strong>and</strong> Streptomyces ikutamanensis Ya-2-1. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1982. Agric. Biol.<br />
Chem., 46: 2871–2872; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> H. Nishimura, 1984. Proc. 28th TEAC, pp. 171–173; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> H.<br />
Nishimura, 1987. Agric. Biol. Chem., 51: 1845–1849.)<br />
Further investigation showed Streptomyces bottropensis SY-2-1 (Noma <strong>and</strong> Iwami, 1994) has<br />
different metabolic pathways for (-)-trans-carveol (81a¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-cis-carveol (81b¢). Namely,<br />
Streptomyces bottropensis SY-2-1 converted (-)-trans-carveol (81a¢) to (-)-carvone (93¢), (-)-carvone-8,9-epoxide<br />
(96¢), (-)-5b-hydroxycarvone (98a¢), <strong>and</strong> (+)-5b-hydroxyneodihydrocarveol<br />
(100aa¢) (Figure 14.85). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, Streptomyces bottropensis SY-2-1 converted (-)-ciscarveol<br />
(81b¢) to give (+)-bottrospicatol (92a¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-5b-hydroxy-cis-carveol (94ba¢) as main<br />
products together with (+)-isobottrospicatol (92b¢) as the minor product as shown in Figure 14.85.<br />
In the metabolism <strong>of</strong> cis-carveol by microorganisms there are four pathways (pathways 1–4)<br />
as shown in Figure 14.86. At first, cis-carveol (81) is metabolized to carvone (93) by C2 dehydrogenation<br />
(Noma, 1977, 1980) (pathway 1). Secondly, cis-carveol (81b) is metabolized via epoxide<br />
as intermediate to bottrospicatol (92) by rearrangement at C2 <strong>and</strong> C8 (Noma et al., 1982; Nishimura<br />
et al., 1983a, 1983b; Noma <strong>and</strong> Nishimura, 1987) (pathway 2). Thirdly, cis-carveol (81b) is hydroxylated<br />
at C5 position to give 5-hydroxy-cis-carveol (94) (Noma <strong>and</strong> Nishimura, 1984) (pathway 3).<br />
81b'<br />
92a'<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
94<br />
93<br />
90<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
81b<br />
FIGURE 14.86 General metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> carveol (81) by microorganisms. (Modified from Noma, Y.<br />
et al., 1982. Agric. Biol. Chem., 46: 2871–2872; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> H. Nishimura, 1984. Proc. 28th TEAC, pp.<br />
171–173; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> H. Nishimura, 1987. Agric. Biol. Chem., 51: 1845–1849; Nishimura, H. <strong>and</strong> Y. Noma,<br />
1996. Biotechnology for Improved Foods <strong>and</strong> Flavors, G.R. Takeoka, et al., ACS Symp. Ser. 637, pp.173–187.<br />
American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.)<br />
O<br />
91<br />
OH<br />
92<br />
O<br />
OH
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 637<br />
TABLE 14.3<br />
Effects <strong>of</strong> (−)-cis- (81b¢) <strong>and</strong> (−)-trans-Carveol (81a¢) Conversion Products<br />
by Streptomyces bottropensis SY-2-1 on the Germination <strong>of</strong> Lettuce Seeds<br />
Germination Rate (%)<br />
Compounds 24 h 48 h<br />
(-)-Carvone (93¢) 47 89<br />
(+)-Bottrospicatol (92¢) 3 48<br />
(-)-Carvone-8,9-epoxide (96¢) 2 77<br />
5b-Hydroxyneodihydrocarveol (102aa¢) 86 96<br />
5b-Hydroxycarvone (98a¢) 91 96<br />
Control 95 96<br />
Note: Concentration <strong>of</strong> each compound was adjusted at 200 ppm.<br />
Finally, cis-carveol (81b) is metabolized to 1-p-menthene-2,9-diol (90) by hydroxylation at C9<br />
position (Dhavalikar <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya, 1966; Dhavalikar et al., 1966) (pathway 4).<br />
Effects <strong>of</strong> (-)-cis- (81b¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-trans-carveol (81a¢) conversion products by Streptomyces<br />
bottropensis SY-2-1 on the germination <strong>of</strong> lettuce seeds was examined <strong>and</strong> the result is shown in<br />
Table 14.3. (+)-Bottrospicatol (92¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-carvone-8,9-epoxide (96¢) showed strong inhibitory<br />
activity for the germination <strong>of</strong> lettuce seeds.<br />
Streptomyces bottropensis SY-2-1 has also different metabolic pathways for (+)-trans-carveol<br />
(81a) <strong>and</strong> (+)-cis-carveol (81b) (Noma <strong>and</strong> Iwami, 1994). Namely, Streptomyces bottropensis SY-2-1<br />
converted (+)-trans-carveol (81a) to (+)-carvone (93), (+)-carvone-8,9-epoxide (96), <strong>and</strong> (+)-5ahydroxycarvone<br />
(98a) (Noma <strong>and</strong> Nishimura, 1982, 1984) (Figure 14.87). On the other h<strong>and</strong>,<br />
Streptomyces bottropensis SY-2-1 converted (+)-cis-carveol (81b) to give (-)-isobottrospicatol (92b)<br />
<strong>and</strong> (+)-5-hydroxy-cis-carveol (94b) as the main products <strong>and</strong> (-)-bottrospicatol (92a) as the minor<br />
product as shown in Figure 14.88 (Noma et al., 1980, Noma <strong>and</strong> Nishimura, 1987; Nishimura <strong>and</strong><br />
Noma, 1996).<br />
Biological activities <strong>of</strong> (+)-bottrospicatol (92a¢) <strong>and</strong> related compounds for plant’s seed germination<br />
<strong>and</strong> root elongation were examined towards barnyard grass, wheat, garden cress, radish, green<br />
foxtail, <strong>and</strong> lettuce (Nishimura <strong>and</strong> Noma, 1996).<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
98a<br />
93<br />
81a<br />
HO<br />
92b<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
96<br />
HO<br />
94ba<br />
81b<br />
92a<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 14.87 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (+)-trans- (81a) <strong>and</strong> (+)-cis-carveol (81b) by Streptomyces bottropensis<br />
SY-2-1. (Modified from Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> H. Nishimura, 1987. Agric. Biol. Chem., 51: 1845–1849; Nishimura,<br />
H. <strong>and</strong> Y. Noma, 1996. Biotechnology for Improved Foods <strong>and</strong> Flavors, G.R. Takeoka, et al., ACS Symp. Ser.<br />
637, pp.173–187. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.)
638 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
91b<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
92b<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
94ba<br />
81b<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
92a<br />
91a<br />
FIGURE 14.88 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (+)-cis-carveol (81b) by Streptomyces bottropensis SY-2-1 <strong>and</strong><br />
Streptomyces ikutamanensis, Ya-2-1. (Modified from Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> H. Nishimura, 1987. Agric. Biol. Chem.,<br />
51: 1845–1849; Nishimura, H. <strong>and</strong> Y. Noma, 1996. Biotechnology for Improved Foods <strong>and</strong> Flavors, G.R.<br />
Takeoka, et al., ACS Symp. Ser. 637, pp.173–187. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.)<br />
Isomers <strong>and</strong> derivatives <strong>of</strong> bottrospicatol were prepared by the procedure shown in Figure 14.89.<br />
The chemical structure <strong>of</strong> each compound was confirmed by the interpretation <strong>of</strong> spectral data. The<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> all isomers <strong>and</strong> derivatives on the germination <strong>of</strong> lettuce seeds were compared. The germination<br />
inhibitory activity <strong>of</strong> (+)-bottrospicatol (92a¢) was the highest <strong>of</strong> isomers. Interestingly, (-)-isobottrospicatol<br />
(92b) was not effective even in a concentration <strong>of</strong> 500 ppm. (+)-Bottrospicatol methyl<br />
ether (92a¢-methyl ether) <strong>and</strong> esters [92a¢-methyl (ethyl <strong>and</strong> n-propyl) ester] exhibited weak inhibitory<br />
activities. The inhibitory activity <strong>of</strong> (-)-isodihydrobottrospicatol (105c¢) was as high as that <strong>of</strong><br />
(+)-bottrospicatol (92a¢). Furthermore, an oxidized compound, (+)-bottrospicatal (374a¢), exhibited<br />
higher activity than (+)-bottrospicatol (92a¢). So, the germination inhibitory activity <strong>of</strong> (+)-bottrospicatal<br />
(374a¢) against several plant seeds, lettuce, green foxtail, radish, garden cress, wheat, <strong>and</strong><br />
92a'<br />
methyl<br />
ether<br />
O<br />
OCH 3<br />
MeI,NaH<br />
O<br />
1stmH 2<br />
.PtO 2<br />
AcOH<br />
105c'<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OCOR<br />
(RCO) 2<br />
Oor<br />
RCOCl/Py<br />
92a'<br />
92a' methyl (ethyl, n-propyl) ester<br />
OH<br />
CrO 3<br />
/Py<br />
374a'<br />
O<br />
CHO<br />
R=CH 3 ,C 2 H 5 ,n-C 3 H 7<br />
FIGURE 14.89 Preparation <strong>of</strong> (+)-bottrospicatol (92a¢) derivatives. (Modified from Nishimura, H. <strong>and</strong> Y.<br />
Noma, 1996. Biotechnology for Improved Foods <strong>and</strong> Flavors, G.R. Takeoka, et al., ACS Symp. Ser. 637,<br />
pp. 173–187. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 639<br />
barnyard grass was examined. The result indicates that (+)-bottrospicatal (374a¢) is a selective germination<br />
inhibitor as follows: lettuce > green foxtail > radish > garden cress > wheat > barnyard grass.<br />
Enantio- <strong>and</strong> diastereoselective biotransformation <strong>of</strong> trans- (81a <strong>and</strong> 81a¢) <strong>and</strong> cis-carveols by<br />
Euglena gracilis Z. (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa 1992) <strong>and</strong> Chlorella pyrenoidosa IAM C-28 was studied<br />
(Noma et al., 1997).<br />
In the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> racemic trans-carveol (81a <strong>and</strong> 81a¢), Chlorella pyrenoidosa IAM<br />
C-28 showed high enantioselectivity for (-)-trans-carveol (81a¢) to give (-)-carvone (93¢), while<br />
(+)-trans-carveol (81a) was not converted at all. The same Chlorella pyrenoidosa IAM C-28<br />
showed high enantioselectivity for (+)-cis-carveol (81b) to give (+)-carvone (93) in the biotransformation<br />
<strong>of</strong> racemic cis-carveol (81b <strong>and</strong> 81b¢). (-)-cis-Carveol (81b¢) was not converted at all. The<br />
same phenomenon was observed in the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> mixture <strong>of</strong> (-)-trans- <strong>and</strong> (-)-ciscarveol<br />
(81a¢ <strong>and</strong> 81b¢) <strong>and</strong> the mixture <strong>of</strong> (+)-trans- <strong>and</strong> (+)-cis-carveol (81a <strong>and</strong> 81b) as shown<br />
in Figure 14.90. The high enantioselectivity <strong>and</strong> the high diastereoselectivity for the dehydrogenation<br />
<strong>of</strong> (-)-trans- <strong>and</strong> (+)-cis-carveols (81a <strong>and</strong> 81b¢) were shown in Euglena gracilis Z. (Noma<br />
<strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 1992), Chlorella pyrenoidosa IAM C-28 (Noma et al., 1997), Nicotiana tabacum,<br />
<strong>and</strong> other Chlorella spp.<br />
On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the high enantioselecivity for 81a¢ was observed in the biotransformation <strong>of</strong><br />
racemic (+)-trans-carveol (81a) <strong>and</strong> (-)-trans-carveol (81a¢) by Chlorella sorokiniana SAG to give<br />
(-)-carvone (93¢).<br />
It was considered that the formation <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvone (93¢) from (-)-trans-carveol (81a¢) by<br />
diastereo- <strong>and</strong> enantioselective dehydrogenation is a very interesting phenomenon in order to<br />
produce mosquito repellent (+)-p-menthane-2,8-diol (50a¢) (Noma, 2007).<br />
(4R)-trans-Carveol (81a¢ ) was converted by Spodptera litura to give 1-p-menthene-6,8,9-triol<br />
(375) (Miyazawa et al., 1996b) (Figure 14.91).<br />
14.3.3.10 Dihydrocarveol<br />
(+)-Neodihydrocarveol (102a¢) was converted to p-menthane-2,8-diol (50a¢), 8-p-menthene-2,<br />
8-diol (107a¢), <strong>and</strong> p-menthane-2,8,9-triols (104a¢ <strong>and</strong> b¢) by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 (Noma<br />
et al., 1985a, 1985b; Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 1995) (Figures 14.92 <strong>and</strong> 14.93). In case <strong>of</strong> Euglena<br />
gracilis Z. mosquito repellent (+)-p-menthane-2,8-diol (50a¢) was formed stereospecifically from<br />
(-)-carvone (93¢) via (+)-dihydrocarvone (101a¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)-neodihydrocarveol (102a¢) (Noma et al.,<br />
1993; Noma, 2007). (-)-Neodihydrocarveol (102a) was also easily <strong>and</strong> stereospecifically converted<br />
by Euglena gracilis Z. to give (-)-p-menthane-2,8-diol (50a) (Noma et al., 1993).<br />
On the other h<strong>and</strong>, Absidia glauca converted (-)-carvone (93¢) stereospecifically to give (+)-8-pmenthene-2,8-diol<br />
(107a¢) via (+)-dihydrocarvone (101a¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)-neodihydrocarveol (102a¢)<br />
(Demirci et al., 2004) (Figure 14.93).<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
81b<br />
O<br />
81a'<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
93<br />
OH<br />
93'<br />
OH<br />
50'<br />
81a<br />
81b'<br />
FIGURE 14.90 Enantio- <strong>and</strong> diastereoselective biotransformation <strong>of</strong> trans- (81a <strong>and</strong> a¢) <strong>and</strong> cis-carveols<br />
(81b <strong>and</strong> b¢) by Euglena gracilis Z <strong>and</strong> Chlorella pyrenoidosa IAM C-28. (Modified from Noma, Y., <strong>and</strong><br />
Y. Asakawa, 1992. Phytochem., 31: 2009–2011; Noma, Y. et al., 1997. Proc. 41st TEAC, pp. 227–229.)
640 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
S. litura<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
81a' 375'<br />
FIGURE 14.91 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (4R)-trans-carveol (81a¢) by Spodptera litura. (Modified from<br />
Miyazawa, M. et al., 1996b. Proc. 40th TEAC, pp. 80–81.)<br />
(+)- (102b) <strong>and</strong> (-)-Dihydrocarveol (102b¢) were converted by 10 kinds <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus spp. to<br />
give mainly (+)- (107b¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-10-hydroxydihydrocarveol (107b, 8-p-menthene-2,10-diol) <strong>and</strong><br />
(+)- (50b¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-8-hydroxydihydrocarveol (50b, p-menthane-2,8-diol), respectively (Figure 14.94).<br />
The metabolic pattern <strong>of</strong> dihydrocarveols is shown in Table 14.4.<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Streptomyces bottropensis, SY-2-1 (+)-dihydrocarveol<br />
(102b) was converted to (+)-dihydrobottrospicatol (105aa) <strong>and</strong> (+)-dihydroisobottrospicatol<br />
(105ab), whereas (-)-dihydrocarveol (102b¢) was metabolized to (-)-dihydrobottrospicatol<br />
(105aa¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-dihydroisobottrospicatol (105ab¢). (+)-Dihydroisobottrospicatol (105ab) <strong>and</strong><br />
(-)-dihydrobottrospicatol (105aa¢) are the major products (Noma, 1984) (Figure 14.95).<br />
Euglena gracilis Z. converted (-)-iso- (102c) <strong>and</strong> (+)-isodihydrocarveol (102c¢) to give the<br />
corresponding 8-hydroxyisodihydrocarveols (50c <strong>and</strong> 50c¢), respectively (Noma et al., 1993)<br />
(Figure 14.96).<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Streptomyces bottropensis, SY-2-1 (-)-neoisodihydrocarveol<br />
(102d) was converted to (+)-isodihydrobottrospicatol (105ba) <strong>and</strong> (+)-isodihydroisobottrospicatol<br />
(105bb), whereas (+)-neoisodihydro-carveol (102d¢) was metabolized to (-)-isodihydrobottrospicatol<br />
(105ba¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-isodihydroisobottrospicatol (105bb¢). (+)-Isodihydroisobottrospicatol (105bb)<br />
<strong>and</strong> (-)-isodihydrobottrospicatol (105ba¢) are the major products (Noma, 1984) (Figure 14.97).<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
102a<br />
(1S,2R,4R)<br />
(–)-Neo<br />
102b<br />
(1S,2S,4R)<br />
(+)-Dihydrocarveol<br />
102c<br />
(1R,2S,4R)<br />
(+)-Iso<br />
102d<br />
(1R,2R,4R)<br />
(+)-Neoiso<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
102a'<br />
(1R,2S,4S)<br />
(+)-Neo<br />
102b'<br />
(1R,2R,4S)<br />
(–)-Dihydrocarveol<br />
102c'<br />
(1S,2R,4S)<br />
(–)-Iso<br />
102d'<br />
(1S,2S,4S)<br />
(–)-Neoiso<br />
FIGURE 14.92 Chemical structure <strong>of</strong> eight kinds <strong>of</strong> dihydrocarveols.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 641<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
102a<br />
50a<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
+ +<br />
+<br />
102a'<br />
50a'<br />
OH<br />
107a'<br />
FIGURE 14.93 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)- <strong>and</strong> (+)-neodihydrocarveol (102a <strong>and</strong> a¢) by Euglena gracilis Z,<br />
Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2, <strong>and</strong> Absidia glauca. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1985a. Annual Meeting<br />
<strong>of</strong> Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Biological Chemistry, Sapporo, p. 68; Noma, Y. et al., 1985b. Proc. 29th TEAC, pp.<br />
235–237; Noma, Y. et al., 1993. Proc. 37th TEAC, pp. 23–25; Noma, Y., 2007. Aromatic Plants from Asia their<br />
Chemistry <strong>and</strong> Application in Food <strong>and</strong> Therapy, L. Jiarovetz, N.X. Dung, <strong>and</strong> V.K. Varshney, pp. 169–186.<br />
Dehradun: Har Krishan Bhalla & Sons; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1995. Biotechnology in Agriculture <strong>and</strong><br />
Forestry, Vol. 33. Medicinal <strong>and</strong> Aromatic Plants VIII, Y.P.S. Bajaj, ed., pp. 62–96. Berlin: Springer; Demirci,<br />
F. et al., 2004. Naturforsch., 59c: 389–392.)<br />
OH<br />
104a'<br />
OH<br />
OH HO<br />
104b'<br />
OH<br />
Euglena gracilis Z. converted (-)- (102d) <strong>and</strong> (+)-neoisodihydrocarveol (102d¢) to give the<br />
corresponding 8-hydroxyneoisodihydrocarveols (50d <strong>and</strong> 50d¢), respectively (Noma et al., 1993)<br />
(Figure 14.98).<br />
Eight kinds <strong>of</strong> 8-hydroxydihydrocarveols (50a–d <strong>and</strong> 50a¢–d¢; 8-p-menthane-2,8-diols) were<br />
obtained from carvone (93 <strong>and</strong> 93¢), dihydrocarvones (101a–b <strong>and</strong> 101a¢–b¢), <strong>and</strong> dihydrocarveols<br />
(102a–d, 102a¢–d¢) by Euglena gracilis Z as shown in Figure 14.99 (Noma et al., 1993).<br />
OH<br />
Aspergillus sp.<br />
E.g<br />
OH<br />
Aspergillus sp.<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
50b 102b 107b<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
Aspergillus sp.<br />
E.g<br />
Aspergillus sp.<br />
OH<br />
50b' 102b' 107b'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 14.94 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)- (102b) <strong>and</strong> (-)-dihydrocarveol (102b¢) by 10 kinds <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus<br />
spp. (Modified from Noma, Y., 1988. The Meeting <strong>of</strong> Kansai Division <strong>of</strong> The Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Chemical<br />
Society <strong>of</strong> Japan, Kagawa, p. 28) <strong>and</strong> Euglena gracilis Z (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1993. Proc. 37th<br />
TEAC, pp. 23–25).
642 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 14.4<br />
Metabolic Pattern <strong>of</strong> Dihydrocarveols (102b <strong>and</strong> 102b¢) by 10 Kinds <strong>of</strong><br />
Aspergillus spp.<br />
Compounds<br />
Microorganisms 107b¢ 50b¢ C.r. (%) 107b 50b C.r. (%)<br />
A. awamori, IFO 4033 0 98 99 3 81 94<br />
A. fumigatus, IFO 4400 0 14 34 + 6 14<br />
A. sojae, IFO 4389 0 47 59 1 50 85<br />
A. usami, IFO 4338 0 32 52 + 5 7<br />
A. cellulosae, M-77 0 27 52 + 7 14<br />
A. cellulosae, IFO 4040 0 30 55 1 5 8<br />
A. terreus, IFO 6123 0 79 92 + 18 46<br />
A. niger, IFO 4034 0 29 49 + 8 12<br />
A. niger, IFO 4049 4 50 67 9 34 59<br />
A. niger, TBUYN-2 29 68 100 30 53 100<br />
C.r.—conversion ratio.<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
105aa<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
102b<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
105ab<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
105aa'<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
102b'<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
105ab'<br />
FIGURE 14.95 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)- (102b) <strong>and</strong> (-)-dihydrocarveol (102b¢) by Streptomyces bottropensis,<br />
SY-2-1. (Modified from Noma, Y., 1984. Kagaku to Seibutsu, 22: 742–746.)<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
E. graclis<br />
E. graclis<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
102c<br />
50c<br />
102c'<br />
50c'<br />
FIGURE 14.96 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-iso- (102c) <strong>and</strong> (-)-dihydrocarveol (102c¢) by Euglena gracilis Z.<br />
(Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1993. Proc. 37th TEAC, pp. 23–25.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 643<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
105ba<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
102d<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
105bb<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
105ba'<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
102d'<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
105bb'<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 14.97 Formation <strong>of</strong> dihydroisobottrospicatols (105) from neoisodihydrocarveol (102d <strong>and</strong> d¢) by<br />
Streptomyces bottropensis, SY-2-1. (Modified from Noma, Y., 1984. Kagaku to Seibutsu, 22: 742–746.)<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
E. graclis<br />
E. graclis<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
102d<br />
50d<br />
102d'<br />
50d'<br />
FIGURE 14.98 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)- (102c) <strong>and</strong> (-)-neoisodihydrocarveol (102c¢) by Euglena gracilis<br />
Z. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1993. Proc. 37th TEAC, pp. 23–25.)<br />
14.3.3.11 Piperitenol<br />
HO<br />
Incubation <strong>of</strong> piperitenol (458) with Aspergillus niger gave a complex metabolites whose structures<br />
have not yet been determined (Noma, 2000).<br />
14.3.3.12 Isopiperitenol<br />
458<br />
HO<br />
110
644 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
102a<br />
50a<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
101a<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
102b<br />
50b<br />
93<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
102c<br />
50c<br />
OH<br />
101b'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
102d<br />
50d<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
102a'<br />
50a'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
101a'<br />
O<br />
102b'<br />
50b'<br />
OH<br />
93'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
102c'<br />
50c'<br />
OH<br />
101b<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
102d'<br />
50d'<br />
FIGURE 14.99 Formation <strong>of</strong> eight kinds <strong>of</strong> 8-hydroxydihydrocarveols (50a–50d, 50a¢–50d¢), dihydrocarvones<br />
(101a–101b <strong>and</strong> 101a¢–101b¢), <strong>and</strong> dihydrocarveols (102a–102d <strong>and</strong> 102a¢–102d¢) from (+)- (93) <strong>and</strong><br />
(-)-carvone (93¢) by Euglena gracilis Z. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1993. Proc. 37th TEAC, pp. 23–25.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 645<br />
Piperitenol (458) was metabolized by Aspergillus niger to give a complex alcohol mixtures whose<br />
structures have not yet been determined (Noma, 2000).<br />
14.3.3.13 Perillyl Alcohol<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
74<br />
R-(+)-<br />
74'<br />
S-(–)-<br />
(-)-Perillyl alcohol (74¢) was epoxidized by Streptomyces ikutamanensis Ya-2-1 to give 8,9-epoxy-<br />
(-)-perillyl alcohol (77¢) (Noma et al., 1986) (Figure 14.100).<br />
(-)-Perillyl alcohol (74¢) was glycosylated by Eucalyptus perriniana suspension cells to<br />
(-)-perillyl alcohol monoglucoside (376¢) <strong>and</strong> diglucoside (377¢) (Hamada et al., 2002; Yonemoto<br />
et al., 2005) (Figure 14.101).<br />
Furthermore, 1-perillly-b-glucopyranoside (376) was converted into the corresponding oligosaccharides<br />
(377–381) using a cyclodextrin glucanotransferase (Yonemoto et al., 2005)<br />
(Figure 14.102).<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
S. ikutamanensis<br />
O<br />
74' 77'<br />
FIGURE 14.100 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-perillyl alcohol (74¢) by Streptomyces ikutamanensis, Ya-2-1.<br />
(Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1986. Proc. 30th TEAC, pp. 204–206.)<br />
OH O-Glc O-Glc-Glc<br />
E. perriniana<br />
+<br />
74' 376' 377'<br />
FIGURE 14.101 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-perillyl alcohol (74¢) by Eucalyptus perriniana suspension cell.<br />
(Modified from Hamada, H. et al., 2002. Proc. 46th TEAC, pp. 321–322; Yonemoto, N. et al., 2005. Proc. 49th<br />
TEAC, pp. 108–110.)
646 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O-Glc<br />
O-Glc-(Glc) n<br />
CGTase<br />
n=1–5<br />
55°C, pH 5.5<br />
376<br />
377–381<br />
FIGURE 14.102 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-perillyl alcohol monoglucoside (376) by CGTase. (Modified from<br />
Yonemoto, N. et al., 2005. Proc. 49th TEAC, pp. 108–110.)<br />
14.3.3.14 Carvomenthol<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
49a<br />
(1S,2R,4R)<br />
(–)-Neo<br />
49b<br />
(1S,2S,4R)<br />
(+)-Carvomenthol<br />
49c<br />
(1R,2S,4R)<br />
(–)-Iso<br />
49d<br />
(1R,2R,4R)<br />
(–)-Neoiso<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
49a'<br />
(1R,2S,4S)<br />
(+)-Neo<br />
49b'<br />
(1R,2R,4S)<br />
(–)-Carvomenthol<br />
49c'<br />
(1S,2R,4S)<br />
(+)-Iso<br />
49d'<br />
(1S,2S,4S)<br />
(+)-Neoiso<br />
(+)-Iso- (49c) <strong>and</strong> (+)-neoisocarvomenthol (49d) were formed from (+)-carvotanacetone (47) via<br />
(-)-isocarvomenthone (48b) by Pseudomonas ovalis, strain 6-1, whereas (+)-neocarvomenthol<br />
(49a¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-carvomenthol (49b¢) were formed from (-)-carvotanacetone (47¢) via (+)-carvomenthone<br />
(48a¢) by the same bacteria; <strong>of</strong> which 48b, 48a¢, <strong>and</strong> 49d were the major products (Noma et al.,<br />
1974a) (Figure 14.103).<br />
Microbial resolution <strong>of</strong> carvomenthols was carried out by selected microorganisms such as<br />
Trichoderma S <strong>and</strong> Bacillus subtilis var. niger (Oritani <strong>and</strong> Yamashita, 1973d). Racemic carvomenthyl<br />
acetate, racemic isocarvomenthyl acetate, <strong>and</strong> racemic neoisocarvomenthyl acetate<br />
were asymmetrically hydrolyzed to (-)-carvomenthol (49b¢) with (+)-carvomenthyl acetate,<br />
(-)-isocarvomenthol (49c) with (+)-isocarvomenthyl acetate, <strong>and</strong> (+)-neoisocarvomenthol (49d¢)<br />
with (-)-neoisocarvomenthyl acetate, respectively; racemic neocarvomenthyl acetate was not<br />
hydrolyzed (Oritani <strong>and</strong> Yamashita, 1973d) (Figure 14.104).
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 647<br />
O<br />
P. ovalis 6-1<br />
OH<br />
+<br />
OH<br />
47<br />
49c<br />
49d<br />
O<br />
P. ovalis 6-1<br />
OH<br />
+<br />
OH<br />
47'<br />
49a'<br />
49b'<br />
FIGURE 14.103 Formation <strong>of</strong> (-)-iso- (49c), (-)-neoiso- (49d), (+)-neo- (49a¢), <strong>and</strong> (-)-carvomenthol (49b¢)<br />
from (+)- (47) <strong>and</strong> (-)-carvotanacetone (47¢) by Pseudomonas ovalis, strain 6-1. (Modified from Noma, Y.<br />
et al., 1974a. Agric. Biol. Chem., 38: 1637–1642.)<br />
OAc<br />
OAc<br />
Trichoderma S<br />
B. subtilis<br />
Not hydroliyzed<br />
49a'<br />
49a'<br />
OAc<br />
OAc<br />
OAc<br />
OH<br />
Trichoderma S<br />
B. subtilis<br />
49b'<br />
49b'<br />
49b<br />
49b'<br />
OAc<br />
OAc<br />
OH<br />
OAc<br />
Trichoderma S<br />
B. subtilis<br />
49c<br />
OAc<br />
49c<br />
OAc<br />
49c<br />
OAc<br />
49c<br />
'<br />
OH<br />
Trichoderma S<br />
B. subtilis<br />
49d<br />
49d<br />
Racemic acetates<br />
FIGURE 14.104 Microbial resolution <strong>of</strong> carvomenthols by Trichoderma S <strong>and</strong> Bacillus. subtilis var. niger.<br />
(Modified from Oritani, T. <strong>and</strong> K. Yamashita, 1973d. Agric. Biol. Chem., 37: 1691–1694.)<br />
49d<br />
49d'
648 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
14.3.4 MONOCYCLIC MONOTERPENE KETONE<br />
14.3.4.1 α, β-Unsaturated Ketone<br />
14.3.4.1.1 Carvone<br />
O<br />
O<br />
S<br />
R<br />
4<br />
93<br />
(4S)-(+)-form<br />
93'<br />
(4R)-(–)-form<br />
Carvone occurs as (+)-carvone (93), (-)-carvone (93¢), or racemic carvone. (S)-(+)-Carvone (93) is<br />
the main component <strong>of</strong> caraway oil (ca. 60%) <strong>and</strong> dill oil <strong>and</strong> has a herbaceous odour reminiscent<br />
<strong>of</strong> caraway <strong>and</strong> dill seeds. (R)-(-)-Carvone (93¢) occurs in spearmint oil at a concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
70–80% <strong>and</strong> has a herbaceous odour similar to spearmint (Bauer et al., 1990).<br />
The distribution <strong>of</strong> carvone convertible microorganisms is summarized in Table 14.5. When<br />
ethanol was used as a carbon source, 40% <strong>of</strong> bacteria converted (+)- (93) <strong>and</strong> (-)-carvone (93’). On<br />
the other h<strong>and</strong>, when glucose was used, 65% <strong>of</strong> bacteria converted carvone. In case <strong>of</strong> yeasts, 75%<br />
converted (+)- (93) <strong>and</strong> (-)-carvone (93¢). Of fungi, 90% <strong>and</strong> 85% <strong>of</strong> fungi converted 93 <strong>and</strong> 93¢,<br />
respectively. In actinomycetes, 56% <strong>and</strong> 90% converted 93 <strong>and</strong> 93¢, respectively.<br />
Many microorganisms except for some strains <strong>of</strong> actinomycetes were capable <strong>of</strong> hydrogenating the<br />
C=C double bond at C-1, 2 position <strong>of</strong> (+)- (93) <strong>and</strong> (-)-carvone (93¢) to give mainly (-)-isodihydrocarvone<br />
(101b) <strong>and</strong> (+)-dihydrocarvone (101a¢), respectively (Noma <strong>and</strong> Tatsumi, 1973; Noma et al.,<br />
1974b; Noma <strong>and</strong> Nonomura, 1974; Noma, 1976, 1977) (Figure 14.105) (Tables 14.6 <strong>and</strong> 14.7).<br />
Furthermore, it was found that (-)-carvone (93¢) was converted via (+)-isodihydrocarvone (101b¢)<br />
to (+)-isodihydrocarveol (102c¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)-neoisodihydrocarveol (102d¢) by some strains <strong>of</strong> actinomycetes<br />
(Noma, 1979a, 1979b). (-)-Isodihydro- carvone (101b) was epimerized to (-)-dihydrocarvone<br />
(101a) after the formation <strong>of</strong> (-)-isodihydrocarvone (101b) from (+)-carvone (93) by the growing cells,<br />
the resting cells, <strong>and</strong> the cell-free extracts <strong>of</strong> Pseudomonas fragi, IFO 3458 (Noma et al., 1975).<br />
TABLE 14.5<br />
The Distribution <strong>of</strong> (+)- (93) <strong>and</strong> (-)-Carvone (93¢) Convertible<br />
Microorganisms<br />
Microorganisms<br />
Number <strong>of</strong><br />
Microorganisms<br />
Used<br />
Numbers <strong>of</strong> Carvone<br />
Convertible<br />
Microorganisms Ratio (%)<br />
Bacteria 40 16 (Ethanol, 93) 40<br />
16 (Ethanol, 93¢) 40<br />
26 (Glucose, 93) 65<br />
26 (Glucose, 93¢) 65<br />
Yeasts 68 51 (93) 75<br />
51 (93¢) 75<br />
Fungi 40 34 (93) 85<br />
36 (93¢) 90<br />
Actinomycetes 48 27 (93) 56<br />
43 (93¢) 90<br />
Source: Noma, Y. et al., 1993. Part VIII. Proc. 37th TEAC, pp. 23–25.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 649<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
102a'<br />
102a<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
101a'<br />
101a<br />
O<br />
O<br />
102b'<br />
102b<br />
93'<br />
OH<br />
93<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
102c'<br />
O<br />
102c<br />
101b'<br />
OH<br />
101b<br />
OH<br />
102d'<br />
102d<br />
FIGURE 14.105 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)- (93) <strong>and</strong> (-)-carvone (93¢) by various kinds <strong>of</strong> microorganisms.<br />
(Modified from Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> C. Tatsumi, 1973. Nippon Nogeikagaku Kaishi, 47: 705–711; Noma, Y. et al.,<br />
1974b. Agric. Biol. Chem., 38: 735–740; Noma, Y. et al., 1974c. Proc. 18th TEAC, pp. 20–23; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> S.<br />
Nonomura, 1974. Agric. Biol. Chem., 38: 741–744; Noma, Y., 1976. Ann. Res. Stud. Osaka Joshigakuen Junior<br />
College, 20: 33–47; Noma, Y., 1977. Nippon Nogeikagaku Kaishi, 51: 463–470.)<br />
Consequently, the metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> carvone by microorganisms were summarized as the<br />
following eight groups (Figure 14.105).<br />
Group 1. (-)-Carvone (93¢)- (+)-dihydrocarvone (101a¢)-(+)-neodihydrocarveol (102a¢)<br />
Group 2. 93¢–101a¢-(-)-Dihydrocarveol (102b¢)<br />
TABLE 14.6<br />
Ratio <strong>of</strong> Microorganisms that Carried Out the Hydrogenation<br />
<strong>of</strong> C=C Double Bond <strong>of</strong> Carvone by Si Plane Attack toward<br />
Microorganisms that Converted Carvone<br />
Microorganisms Ratio (%)<br />
Bacteria<br />
100 a<br />
96 b<br />
Yeasts 74<br />
Fungi 80<br />
Actinomycetes 39<br />
a<br />
When ethanol was used.<br />
b<br />
When glucose was used.
650 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Group 3. 93¢–101a¢-102a¢ <strong>and</strong> 102b¢<br />
Group 4. 93¢-(+)-Isodihydrocarvone (101b¢)–102c¢ <strong>and</strong> 102d’<br />
Group 5. (+)-Carvone (93)-(-)-isodihydrocarvone (101b)-(-)-neoisodihydrocarveol (102d)<br />
Group 6. 93–101b–102c<br />
Group 7. 93–101b–102c <strong>and</strong> 102d<br />
Group 8. 93–101b–101a<br />
The result <strong>of</strong> the mode action <strong>of</strong> both the hydrogenation <strong>of</strong> carvone <strong>and</strong> the reduction for dihydrocarvone<br />
by microorganism is as follows. In bacteria, only two strains were able to convert<br />
(-)-carvone (93¢) via (+)-dihydrocarvone (101a¢) to (-)-dihydrocarveol (102b¢) as the major product<br />
(Group 3, when ethanol was used as a carbon source, 12.5% <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvone (93¢) convertible<br />
microorganisms belonged to this group <strong>and</strong> when glucose was used, 8% belonged to this group)<br />
(Noma <strong>and</strong> Tatsumi 1973; Noma et al., 1975), whereas when (+)-carvone (93) was converted, one<br />
strain converted it to a mixture <strong>of</strong> (-)-isodihydrocarveol (102c) <strong>and</strong> (-)-neoisodihydrocarveol<br />
(102d) (Group 7, 6% <strong>and</strong> 4% <strong>of</strong> 93 convertible bacteria belonged to this group, when ethanol <strong>and</strong><br />
glucose were used, respectively.) <strong>and</strong> four strains converted it via (-)-isodihydrocarvone (101b) to<br />
(-)-dihydrocarvone (101a) (Group 8, 6% <strong>and</strong> 15% <strong>of</strong> (+)-carvone (93¢) convertible bacteria<br />
belonged to this group, when ethanol <strong>and</strong> glucose were used, respectively.) (Noma et al., 1975). In<br />
yeasts, 43% <strong>of</strong> carvone convertible yeasts belong to group 1, 14% to group 2, <strong>and</strong> 33% to group 3<br />
(<strong>of</strong> this group, three strains are close to group 1) <strong>and</strong> 12% to group 5, 4% to group 6, <strong>and</strong> 27% to<br />
group 7 (<strong>of</strong> this group, three strains are close to group 5 <strong>and</strong> one strain is close to group 6). In<br />
fungi, 51% <strong>of</strong> fungi metabolizing (-)-carvone (93¢) by way <strong>of</strong> group 1 <strong>and</strong> 3% via group 3, but<br />
there was no strain capable <strong>of</strong> metabolizing (-)-carvone (93¢) via group 2, whereas 20% <strong>of</strong> fungi<br />
metabolized (+)-carvone (93) via group 5 <strong>and</strong> 29% via group 7, but there was no strain capable <strong>of</strong><br />
metabolizeing (+)-carvone (93) via group 6. In actinomycetes, (-)-carvone (93¢) was converted to<br />
dihydrocarveols via group 1 (49%), group 2 (0%), group 3 (9%), <strong>and</strong> group 4 (28%), whereas<br />
(+)-carvone (93) was converted to dihydrocarveols via group 5 (7%), group 6 (0%), group 7 (19%),<br />
<strong>and</strong> group 8 (0%).<br />
Furthermore, (+)-neodihydrocarveol (102a¢) stereospecifically formed from (-)-carvone (93¢) by<br />
Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 was further biotransformed to mosquito repellent (1R,2S,4R)-(+)-pmenthane-2,8-diol<br />
(50a¢), (1R,2S,4R)-(+)-8-p-menthene-2,10-diol (107a¢), <strong>and</strong> the mixture <strong>of</strong><br />
(1R,2S,4R,8S/R)-(+)-p-menthane-2,8,9-triols (104aa¢ <strong>and</strong> 104ab¢), while Absidia glauca ATCC<br />
22752 gave 107a¢ stereoselectively from 102a¢ (Demirci et al., 2001) (Figure 14.106).<br />
On the other h<strong>and</strong>, (-)-carvone (93¢) was biotransformed stereoselectively to (+)-neodihydrocarveol<br />
(102a¢) via (+)-dihydrocarvone (101a¢) by a strain <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus niger (Noma <strong>and</strong> Nonomura<br />
1974), Euglena gracilis Z. (Noma et al., 1993), <strong>and</strong> Chlorella miniata (Gondai et al., 1999).<br />
Furthermore, in Euglena gracilis Z., mosquito repellent (1R,2S,4R)-(+)-p-menthane-2,8-diol (50a¢)<br />
was obtained stereospecifically from (-)-carvone (93¢) via 101a¢ <strong>and</strong> 102a¢ (Figure 14.107).<br />
As the microbial method for the formation <strong>of</strong> mosquito repellentl 50a¢ was established, the production<br />
<strong>of</strong> (+)-dihydrocarvone (101a¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)-neodihydrocarveol (102a¢) as the precursor <strong>of</strong> mosquito<br />
repellent 50a¢ was investigated by using 40 strains <strong>of</strong> bacteria belonging to Escherichia,<br />
Aerobacter, Serratia, Proteus, Alcaligenes, Bacillus, Agrobacterium, Micrococcus, Staphylococcus,<br />
Corynebacterium, Sarcina, Arthrobacter, Brevibacterium, Pseudomonas, <strong>and</strong> Xanthomonas spp.,<br />
68 strains <strong>of</strong> yeasts belonged to Schzosaccharomyces, Endomycopsis, Saccharomyces,<br />
Schwanniomyces, Debaryomyces, Pichia, Hansenula, Lipomyces, Torulopsis, Saccharomycodes,<br />
Cryptococcus, Kloeckera, Trigonopsis, Rhodotorula, C<strong>and</strong>ida, <strong>and</strong> Trichosporon spp., 40 strains <strong>of</strong><br />
fungi belonging to Mucor, Absidia, Penicillium, Rhizopus, Aspergillus, Monascus, Fusarium,<br />
Pullularia, Keratinomyces, Oospora, Neurospora, Ustilago, Sporotrium, Trichoderma, Gliocladium,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Phytophythora spp., <strong>and</strong> 48 strains <strong>of</strong> actinomycetes belonging to Streptomyces, Actinoplanes,<br />
Nocardia, Micromonospora, Microbispora, Micropolyspora, Amorphosporangium, Thermopolyspora,<br />
Planomonospora, <strong>and</strong> Streptosporangium spp.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 651<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
+<br />
93'<br />
101a'<br />
102a'<br />
S OH<br />
OH<br />
104aa'<br />
HO<br />
R<br />
104ab'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
107a'<br />
50a'<br />
FIGURE 14.106 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvone (93¢) by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 <strong>and</strong> Absidia glauca<br />
ATCC 22752. (Modified from Demirci, F. et al., 2001. XII Biotechnology Congr., Book <strong>of</strong> abstracts, p. 47.)<br />
O<br />
A.n.<br />
E.g.<br />
C.p.<br />
O<br />
A.n.<br />
E.g.<br />
C.p.<br />
OH<br />
E.g.<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
93' 101a' 102a'<br />
50a'<br />
FIGURE 14.107 Metabolic pathway <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvone (93¢) by Aspergillus niger, Euglena gracilis Z, <strong>and</strong><br />
Chlorella miniata. (Modified from Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> S. Nonomura, 1974. Agric. Biol. Chem., 38: 741–744;<br />
Noma, Y. et al., 1993. Proc. 37th TEAC, pp. 23–25; Gondai, T. et al., 1999. Proc. 43rd TEAC, pp. 217–219.)<br />
As a result, 65% <strong>of</strong> bacteria, 75% <strong>of</strong> yeasts, 90% <strong>of</strong> fungi, <strong>and</strong> 90% <strong>of</strong> actinomycetes converted<br />
(-)-carvone (93¢) to (+)-dihydrocarvone (101a¢) or (+)-neodihydrocarveol (102a¢) (Figure 14.105).<br />
Many microorganisms are capable <strong>of</strong> converting (-)-carvone (93¢) to (+)-neodihydrocarveol (102a¢)<br />
stereospecifically. Some <strong>of</strong> the useful microorganisms are listed in Tables 14.7 <strong>and</strong> 14.8. There is no<br />
good chemical method to obtain (+)-neodihydrocarveol (102a¢) in large quantity. It was considered<br />
that the method utilizing microorganisms is a very useful means <strong>and</strong> better than the chemical<br />
synthesis for the production <strong>of</strong> mosquito repellent precursor (+)-neodihydrocarveol (102a¢).<br />
(-)-Carvone (93) was biotransformed by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 to give mainly (+)-8-hydroxyneodihydrocarveol<br />
(50a¢), (+)-8,9-epoxyneodihydrocarveol (103a¢), <strong>and</strong> (+)-10-hydroxyneodihydrocarveol<br />
(107a¢) via (+)-dihydrocarvone (101a¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)-neodihydrocarveol (102a¢). Aspergillus<br />
niger TBUYN-2 dehydrogenated (+)-cis-carveol (81b) to give (+)-carvone (93), which was further<br />
converted to (-)-isodihydrocarvone (101b). Compound 101b was further metabolized by four pathways<br />
to give 10-hydroxy- (-)-isodihydrocarvone (106b), (1S,2S,4S)-p-menthane-1,2-diol (71d) via<br />
1a-hydroxy- (-)-isodihydrocarvone (72b) as intermediate, (-)-isodihydrocarveol (102c), <strong>and</strong><br />
(-)-neoisodihydrocarveol (102d). Compound 102d was further converted to isodihydroisobottrospicatol<br />
(105bb) via 8,9-epoxy-(-)-neoisodihydrocarveol (103d); Compound 105¢ was a major<br />
product (Noma et al., 1985a) (Figure 14.109).<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> the plant pathogenic fungus Absidia glauca (-)-carvone (93¢) was metabolized to give<br />
the diol, 10-hydroxy-(+)-neodihydrocarveol (107a¢) (Nishimura et al., 1983b).<br />
(+)-Carvone (93) was converted by five bacteria <strong>and</strong> one fungus (Verstegen-Haaksma et al., 1995) to<br />
give (-)-dihydrocarvone (101a), (-)-isodihydrocarvone (101b), <strong>and</strong> (-)-neoisodihydrocarveol (102d).
652 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
O<br />
102d<br />
OH<br />
101b<br />
O<br />
102c<br />
93<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
102b<br />
OH<br />
101a<br />
102a<br />
FIGURE 14.108 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (+)-carvone (93) by Pseudomonas ovalis, strain 6-1 <strong>and</strong> other many<br />
microorganisms. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1974b. Agric. Biol. Chem., 38: 735–740.)<br />
TABLE 14.7<br />
Summary <strong>of</strong> Microbial <strong>and</strong> Chemical<br />
Hydrogenation <strong>of</strong> (−)-Carvone (93¢) for the<br />
Formation <strong>of</strong> (+)-Dihdyrocarvone (101a¢) <strong>and</strong><br />
(+)-Isodihydrocarvone (101b¢)<br />
Compounds<br />
Microorganisms 101a¢ 101b¢<br />
Amorphosporangium auranticolor 100 0<br />
Microbiospora rosea IFO 3559 86 0<br />
Bacillus subtilis var. niger 85 13<br />
Bacillus subtilis IFO 3007 67 11<br />
Pseudomonas polycolor IFO 3918 75 15<br />
Pseudomonas graveolens IFO 3460 74 17<br />
Arthrobacter pascens IFO 121139 73 12<br />
Picha membranaefaciens IFO 0128 70 16<br />
Saccharomyces ludwigii IFO 1043 69 18<br />
Alcalygenes faecalis IAM B-141-1 70 13<br />
Zn-25% KOH–EtOH 73 27<br />
Raney-10% NaOH 71 19<br />
Source: Noma, Y., 1976. Ann. Res. Stud. Osaka Joshigakuen<br />
Junior College, 20: 33–47.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 653<br />
TABLE 14.8<br />
Summary <strong>of</strong> Microbial <strong>and</strong> Chemical Reduction <strong>of</strong> (-)-Carvone (93¢) for the<br />
Formation <strong>of</strong> (+)-Neodihydrocarveol (102a¢)<br />
Compounds<br />
Microorganisms 101a¢ 101b¢ 102a¢ 102b¢ 102c¢ 102d¢<br />
Torulopsis xylinus IFO 454 0 0 100 0 0 0<br />
Monascus anka var. rubellus IFO 5965 0 0 100 0 0 0<br />
Fusarium anguioides Sherbak<strong>of</strong>f IFO 4467 0 0 100 0 0 0<br />
Phytophthora infestans IFO4872 0 0 100 0 0 0<br />
Kloeckera magna IFO 0868 0 0 98 2 0 0<br />
Kloeckera antillarum IFO 0669 19 4 72 0 0 0<br />
Streptomyces rimosus + 0 98 0 0 0<br />
Penicillium notatum Westling IFO 464 6 2 92 0 0 0<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida pseudotropicalis IFO 0882 17 4 79 0 0 0<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida parapsilosis IFO 0585 16 4 80 0 0 0<br />
LiAlH 4 0 0 17 67 2 13<br />
Meerwein–Ponndorf–Verley reduction 0 0 29 55 9 5<br />
Source: Noma, Y., 1976. Ann. Res. Stud. Osaka Joshigakuen Junior College, 20: 33–47.<br />
Sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the microorganism to (+)-carvone (93) <strong>and</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the products prevented yields exceeding<br />
0.35 g/L in batch cultures. The fungus Trychoderma pseudokoningii gave the highest yield <strong>of</strong><br />
(-)-neoisodihydrocarveol (102d) (Figure 14.110). (+)-Carvone (93) is known to inhibit fungal growth <strong>of</strong><br />
Fusarium sulphureum when it was administered via the gas phase (Oosterhaven et al., 1995a, 1995b).<br />
Under the same conditions, the related fungus, Fusarium solani var. coeruleum was not inhibited.<br />
In liquid medium, both fungi were found to convert (+)-carvone (93), with the same rate, mainly to<br />
(-)-isodihydrocarvone (101b), (-)-isodihydrocarveol (102c), <strong>and</strong> (-)-neoisodihydrocarveol (102d).<br />
14.3.4.1.1.1 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Carvone to Carveols by Actinomycetes The distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
actinomycetes capable <strong>of</strong> reducing carbonyl group <strong>of</strong> carvone containing a, b-unsaturated ketone to<br />
(-)-trans- (81a¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-cis-carveol (81b¢) was investigated. Of 93 strains <strong>of</strong> actinomycetes, 63<br />
strains were capable <strong>of</strong> converting (-)-carvone (93¢) to carveols. The percentage <strong>of</strong> microorganisms<br />
that produced carveols from (-)-carvone (93¢) to total microorganisms was about 71%. Microorganisms<br />
that produced carveols were classified into three groups according to the formation <strong>of</strong> (-)-transcarveol<br />
(81a¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-cis-carveol (81b¢): group 1, (-)-carvone-81b¢ only; group 2, (-)-carvone-81a¢<br />
only; <strong>and</strong> group 3, (-)-carvone-mixture <strong>of</strong> 81a¢ <strong>and</strong> 81b¢. Three strains belonged to group 1 (4.5%),<br />
34 strains belonged to group 2 (51.1%), <strong>and</strong> 29 strains belonged to group 3 (44%; <strong>of</strong> this group two<br />
strains were close to group 1 <strong>and</strong> 14 strains were close to group 2).<br />
Streptomyces, A-5-1 isolated from soil converted (-)-carvone (93¢) to 101a¢–102d¢ <strong>and</strong> (-)-transcarveol<br />
(81a¢), whereas Nocardia, 1-3-11 converted (-)-carvone (93¢) to (-)-cis-carveol (81b¢) together<br />
with 101a¢–81a¢ (Noma, 1980). In case <strong>of</strong> Nocardia, the reaction between 93¢ <strong>and</strong> 81a¢ was reversible<br />
<strong>and</strong> the direction from 81a¢ to 93¢ is predominantly (Noma, 1979a, 1979b; 1980) (Figure 14.111).<br />
(-)-Carvone (93¢) was metabolized by actinomycetes to give (-)-trans- (81a¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-cis-carveol<br />
(81b¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)-dihydrocarvone (101a¢) as reduced metabolites. Compound 81b¢ was further<br />
metabolized to (+)-bottrospicatol (92a¢). Furthermore, 93¢ was hydroxylated at C-5 position <strong>and</strong><br />
C-8, 9 position to give 5b-hydroxy-(-)-carvone (98a¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-carvone-8,9-epoxide (96¢), respectively.<br />
Compound 98a¢ was further metabolized to 5b-hydroxyneodihydrocarveol (100aa¢) via<br />
5b-hydroxy-dihydrocarvone (99a¢) (Noma, 1979a, 1979b; 1980) (Figure 14.111).<br />
Metabolic pattern <strong>of</strong> (+)-carvone (93) is similar to that <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvone (93¢) in Streptomyces bottropensis.<br />
(+)-Carvone (93) was converted by Streptomyces bottropensis to give (+)-carvone-8,9-epoxide
654 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
93'<br />
101a'<br />
102a'<br />
O<br />
103a'<br />
OH<br />
50a'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
107a'<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
104a'<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
71d<br />
106b<br />
72b<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
102c<br />
81b<br />
93<br />
101b<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
102d<br />
O<br />
103d<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
105bb<br />
FIGURE 14.109 Possible main metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvone (93¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)-carvone (93) by Aspergillus<br />
niger TBUYN-2. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1985a. Annual Meeting <strong>of</strong> Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Biological<br />
Chemistry, Sapporo, p. 68.)<br />
(96) <strong>and</strong> (+)-5a-hydroxycarvone (98a) (Figure 14.112). (+)-Carvone-8,9-epoxide (96) has light<br />
sweet aroma <strong>and</strong> has strong inhibitory activity for the germination <strong>of</strong> lettuce seeds (Noma <strong>and</strong><br />
Nishimura, 1982).<br />
The investigation <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvone (93¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)-carvone (93) conversion pattern was carried out by<br />
using rare actinomycetes. The conversion pattern was classified as follows (Figure 14.113):<br />
Group 1. Carvone (93)–dihydrocarvones (101)–dihydrocarveol (102)–dihydrocarveol-8,9-<br />
epoxide (103)–dihydrobottrospicatols (105)–5-hydroxydihydrocarveols (100)<br />
Group 2. Carvone (93)–carveols (89)–bottrospicatols (92)–5-hydroxy-cis-carveols (12)<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
93<br />
101b<br />
102d<br />
FIGURE 14.110 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-carvone (93) by Trychoderma pseudokoningii. (Modified from<br />
Verstegen-Haaksma, A.A. et al., 1995. Ind. Crops Prod., 4: 15–21.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 655<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
81a'<br />
O<br />
O<br />
92a'<br />
OH<br />
81b'<br />
O<br />
101a'<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
93'<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
100aa'<br />
99a'<br />
FIGURE 14.111 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvone (93¢) by Streptomyces bottropensis SY-2-1, Streptomyces<br />
ikutamanensis Ya-2-1, Streptomyces, A-5-1, <strong>and</strong> Nocardia, 1-3-11. (Modified from Noma, Y., 1979a. Nippon<br />
Nogeikagaku Kaishi, 53: 35–39; Noma, Y., 1979b. Ann. Res. Stud. Osaka Joshigakuen Junior College, 23:<br />
27–31; Noma, Y., 1980. Agric. Biol. Chem., 44: 807–812; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> H. Nishimura, 1983a. Annual Meeting<br />
<strong>of</strong> Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Biological Chemical Society, Book <strong>of</strong> abstracts, p. 390; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> H. Nishimura,<br />
1983b. Proc. 27th TEAC, pp. 302–305.)<br />
98a'<br />
96'<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
92b<br />
81b<br />
O<br />
101b<br />
O<br />
93<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
98a<br />
FIGURE 14.112 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (+)-carvone (93¢) by Streptomyces bottropensis SY-2-1 <strong>and</strong><br />
Streptomyces ikutamanensis Ya-2-1. (Modified from Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> H. Nishimura, 1982. Proc. 26th TEAC,<br />
pp. 156–159l; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> H. Nishimura, 1983a. Annual Meeting <strong>of</strong> Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Biological Chemical<br />
Society, Book <strong>of</strong> abstracts, p. 390; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> H. Nishimura, 1983b. Proc. 27th TEAC, pp. 302–305;<br />
Noma, Y., 1984. Kagaku to Seibutsu, 22: 742–746.)<br />
96
656 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
102a<br />
O<br />
103a<br />
OH<br />
101a<br />
O<br />
102b<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
105aa<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
105ab<br />
93<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
102c<br />
103c<br />
101b<br />
102d<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
105ba<br />
HO<br />
105bb<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
102a'<br />
103a'<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
101a'<br />
102b'<br />
105aa'<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
105ab'<br />
93'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
102c'<br />
O<br />
103c'<br />
101b'<br />
102d'<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
105ba'<br />
HO<br />
105bb'<br />
FIGURE 14.113 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (+)- (93) <strong>and</strong> (-)-carvone (93¢) <strong>and</strong> dihydrocarveols (102a-d <strong>and</strong><br />
102a¢-d¢) by Streptomyces bottropensis, SY-2-1 <strong>and</strong> Streptomyces ikutamanesis, Ya-2-1. (Modified from<br />
Noma, Y., 1984. Kagaku to Seibutsu, 22: 742–746.)<br />
O
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 657<br />
Group 3. Carvone (93)–5-hydroxycarvone (98)–5-hydroxyneodihydrocarveols (15)<br />
Group 4. Carvone (93)–carvone-8,9-epoxides (96).<br />
Of 50 rare actinomycets, 22 strains (44%) were capable <strong>of</strong> converting (-)-carvone (93¢) to give<br />
(-)-carvone-8,9-epoxide (96¢) via pathway 4 <strong>and</strong> (+)-5b-hydroxycarvone (98a¢), (+)-5a-hydroxycarvone<br />
(98b¢), <strong>and</strong> (+)-5b-hydroxyneodihydrocarveol (100aa¢) via pathway 3 (Noma <strong>and</strong> Sakai, 1984).<br />
On the other h<strong>and</strong>, in case <strong>of</strong> (+)-carvone (93) conversion, 44% <strong>of</strong> rare actinomycetes were<br />
capable <strong>of</strong> converting (+)-carvone (93) to give (+)-carvone-8,9-epoxide (96) via pathway 4 <strong>and</strong><br />
(-)-5a-hydroxycarvone (98a), (-)-5b-hydroxycarvone (98b), <strong>and</strong> (-)-5a-hydroxyneodihydrocarveol<br />
(100aa) via pathway 3 (Noma <strong>and</strong> Sakai, 1984).<br />
14.3.4.1.1.2 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Carvone by Citrus Pathogenic Fungi, Aspergillus niger Tiegh<br />
TBUYN Citrus pathogenic Aspergillus niger Tiegh (CBAYN) <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2<br />
hydrogenated C=C double bond at C-1, 2 position <strong>of</strong> (+)-carvone (93) to give (-)-isodihydrocarvone<br />
(101b) as the major product together with a small amount <strong>of</strong> (-)-dihydrocarvone (101a), <strong>of</strong> which<br />
101b was further metabolized through two kinds <strong>of</strong> pathways as follows; namely one is the pathway<br />
to give (+)-1a-hydroxyneoisodihydrocarveol (71) via (+)-1a-hydroxyisodihydrocarvone (72) <strong>and</strong><br />
the other one is the pathway to give (+)-4a-hydroxy-isodihydrocarvone (378) (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa,<br />
2008) (Figure 14.114).<br />
The biotransformation <strong>of</strong> enones such as (-)-carvone (93¢) by the cultured cells <strong>of</strong> Chlorella<br />
miniata was examined. It was found that the cells reduced stereoselectively the enones from si-face<br />
at a-position <strong>of</strong> the carbonyl group <strong>and</strong> then the carbonyl group from re-face (Figure 14.115).<br />
Stereospecific hydrogenation occurs independent <strong>of</strong> the configuration <strong>and</strong> the kinds <strong>of</strong> the substituent<br />
at C-4 position, so that the methyl group at C-1 position is fixed mainly at R configuration.<br />
[2- 2 H]- (-)-Carvone ([2- 2 H]-93¢) was synthesized in order to clear up the hydrogenation mechanism<br />
at C-2 by microorganisms. (Compound [2- 2 H]-93 was also easily biotransformed to [2- 2 H]-8-<br />
hydroxy-(+)-neodihydro-carveol (50a¢) via [2- 2 H]-(+)-neodihydrocarveol (102a¢). On the basis <strong>of</strong><br />
1<br />
H-NMR spectral data <strong>of</strong> compounds 102a¢ <strong>and</strong> 50a¢, the hydrogen addition <strong>of</strong> the carbon–carbon<br />
double bond at the C 1 <strong>and</strong> C 2 position by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2, Euglena gracilis Z., <strong>and</strong><br />
Dunaliella tertiolecta occurs from the si face <strong>and</strong> re face, respectively, namely, anti addition (Noma<br />
et al., 1995) (Figure 14.115) (Table 14.9).<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O O O<br />
OH<br />
93<br />
101b<br />
72<br />
71<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
101a<br />
378<br />
FIGURE 14.114 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (+)-carvone (93) by Citrus pathogenic fungi, Aspergillus niger<br />
Tiegh CBAYN <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2. (Modified from Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2008. Proc.<br />
52nd TEAC, pp. 206–208.)
658 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
H from si face<br />
2 H<br />
re re si<br />
O<br />
2 H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
2 H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
2 H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
from re face<br />
OH<br />
93' 101a' 102a' 50a'<br />
FIGURE 14.115 The stereospecific hydrogenation <strong>of</strong> the C=C double bond <strong>of</strong> a, b-unsaturated ketones, the<br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> saturated ketone, <strong>and</strong> the hydroxylation by Euglena gracilis Z. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1995.<br />
Proc. 39th TEAC, pp. 367–368; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1998. Biotechnology in Agriculture <strong>and</strong> Forestry,<br />
Vol. 41. Medicinal <strong>and</strong> Aromatic Plants X, Y.P.S. Bajaj, ed., pp. 194–237. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.)<br />
14.3.4.1.1.3 Hydrogenation Mechanisms <strong>of</strong> C=C Double Bond <strong>and</strong> Carbonyl Group In<br />
order to underst<strong>and</strong> the mechanism <strong>of</strong> the hydrogenation <strong>of</strong> a-, b-unsaturated ketone <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvone<br />
(93¢) <strong>and</strong> the reduction <strong>of</strong> carbonyl group <strong>of</strong> dihydrocarvone (101a¢) (-)-carvone (93¢),<br />
(+)-dihydrocarvone (101a¢) <strong>and</strong> the analogues <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvone (93¢) were chosen <strong>and</strong> the conversion<br />
<strong>of</strong> the analogues was carried out by using Pseudomonas ovalis, strain 6-1. As the analogues <strong>of</strong><br />
carvone (93 <strong>and</strong> 93¢), (-)- (47¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)-carvotanacetone (47), 2-methyl-2-cyclohexenone (379), the<br />
mixture <strong>of</strong> (-)-cis- (81b¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-trans-carveol (81a¢), 2-cyclohexenone, racemic menthenone<br />
(148), (-)-piperitone (156), (+)-pulegone (119), <strong>and</strong> 3-methyl-2-cyclohexenone (381) were chosen.<br />
Of these analogues, (-)- (47¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)-carvotanacetone (47) were reduced to give (+)-carvomenthone<br />
(48a¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-isocarvomenthone (48b¢), respectively. 2-Methyl-2-cyclohexenone (379) was<br />
mainly reduced to (-)-2-methylcyclohexanone. But other compounds were not reduced.<br />
The efficient formation <strong>of</strong> (+)-dihydrocarvone (101a), (-)-isodihydrocarvone (101b¢), (+)-carvomenthone<br />
(48a), (-)-isocarvomenthone (48b¢), <strong>and</strong> (-)-2-methylcyclohexanone from (-)-carvone<br />
(93), (+)-carvone (93¢), (-)-carvotanacetone (47), (+)-carvotanacetone (47¢), <strong>and</strong> 2-methyl-2-cyclohexenone<br />
(379) suggested at least that C=C double bond conjugated with carbonyl group may be<br />
hydrogenated from behind (si plane) (Noma, 1977; Noma et al., 1974b) (Figure 14.116).<br />
14.3.4.1.1.4 What is Hydrogen Honor in the Hydrogenation <strong>of</strong> Carvone to Dihydrocarvone?<br />
What is Hydrogen Donor in Carvone Reductase? Carvone reductase prepared from<br />
Euglena gracilis Z, which catalyzes the NADH-dependent reduction <strong>of</strong> the C=C bond adjacent to the<br />
carbonyl group, was characterized with regard to the stereochemistry <strong>of</strong> the hydrogen transfer into<br />
the substrate. The reductase was isolated from Euglena gracilis Z <strong>and</strong> was found to reduce stereospecifically<br />
the C=C double bond <strong>of</strong> carvone by anti-addition <strong>of</strong> hydrogen from the si face at a-position<br />
to the carbonyl group <strong>and</strong> the re face at b-position (Table 14.9). The hydrogen atoms participating in<br />
the enzymatic reduction at a- <strong>and</strong> b-position to the carbonyl group originate from the medium <strong>and</strong><br />
the pro-4R hydrogen <strong>of</strong> NADH, respectively (Shimoda et al., 1998) (Figure 14.117).<br />
TABLE 14.9<br />
The Summary for the Stereospecificity <strong>of</strong> the Reduction <strong>of</strong> the C=C Double<br />
Bond <strong>of</strong> [2- 2 H]-(-)-Carvone ([2- 2 H]-93) by Various Kinds <strong>of</strong> Microorganisms<br />
Stereochemistry at C-2H <strong>of</strong> Compounds<br />
Microorganisms 102a 50a<br />
Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2<br />
b<br />
Euglena gracilis Z b b<br />
Dunaliella tertiolecta<br />
b<br />
The cultured cells <strong>of</strong> Nicotiana tabacum (Suga et al., 1986) b
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 659<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
93'<br />
93<br />
47'<br />
47<br />
O<br />
96'<br />
O<br />
96<br />
44'<br />
OH<br />
44<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
98a'<br />
379<br />
380<br />
148<br />
148<br />
381<br />
119<br />
FIGURE 14.116 Substrates used for the hydrogenation <strong>of</strong> C=C double bond with Pseudomonas ovalis, strain<br />
6-1, Streptomyces bottropensis SY-2-1, Streptomyces ikutamanensis Ya-2-1, <strong>and</strong> Euglena gracilis Z.<br />
TABLE 14.10<br />
Purification <strong>of</strong> the Reductase from Euglena gracilis Z.<br />
Total<br />
Protein (mg)<br />
Total Activity<br />
Unit ¥ 10 4<br />
Sp. Act Units per<br />
Gram Protein<br />
Crude extract 125 2.2 1.7 1<br />
DEAE Toyopearl 7 1.5 21 12<br />
AF-Blue Toyopearl 0.1 0.03 30 18<br />
Fold<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> biotransformation by using Cyanobacterium (+)- (93) <strong>and</strong> (-)-carvone (93¢) were<br />
converted with a different type <strong>of</strong> pattern to give (+)-isodihydrocarvone (101b¢, 76.6%) <strong>and</strong><br />
(-)- dihydrocarvone (101a, 62.2%), respectively (Kaji et al., 2002) (Figure 14.118). On the other h<strong>and</strong>,<br />
Catarantus rosea cultured cell biotransformed (-)-carvone (93¢) to give 5b-hydroxy- (+)-neodihydrocarveol<br />
(100aa¢, 57.5%), 5a-hydroxy-(+)-neodihydrocarveol (100ab¢, 18.4%), 5a-hydroxy-(-)-<br />
carvone (98b¢), 4b-hydroxy-(-)-carvone (384¢, 6.3%), 10-hydroxycarvone (390¢), 5b-hydroxycarvone<br />
(98¢), 5a-hydroxyneodihydrocarveol (100ab¢), 5b-hydroxyneodihydrocarveol (100aa¢), <strong>and</strong> 5ahydroxydihydrocarvone<br />
(99b¢) as the metabolites as shown in Figure 14.119, whereas (+)-carvone<br />
(93) gave 5a-hydroxy-(+)-carvone (98a, 65.4%) <strong>and</strong> 4a-hydroxy-(+)-carvone (384, 34.6%) (Hamada<br />
<strong>and</strong> Yasumune, 1995; Hamada et al., 1996; Kaji et al., 2002) (Figure 14.119) (Table 14.11).<br />
(-)-Carvone (93¢) was incubated with Cyanobacterium, enone reductase (43 kDa) isolated from the<br />
bacterium <strong>and</strong> microsomal enzyme to afford (+)-isodihydrocarvone (101b¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)-dihydro carvone<br />
Hs<br />
NADH<br />
H R<br />
CONH 2<br />
N-R<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
si<br />
re<br />
93'<br />
anti-addition<br />
FIGURE 14.117 Stereochemistry in the reduction <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvone (93¢) by the reductase from Euglena<br />
gracilis Z. (Modified from Shimoda, K. et al., 1998. Phytochem., 49: 49–53.)<br />
O<br />
101a'
660 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
Cyanobacterium<br />
Cyanobacterium<br />
93<br />
101a<br />
93' 101b'<br />
FIGURE 14.118 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)- <strong>and</strong> (+)-carvone (93 <strong>and</strong> 93¢) by Cyanobacterium. (Modified<br />
from Kaji, M. et al., 2002. Proc. 46th TEAC, pp. 323–325.)<br />
O<br />
Catharanthus<br />
roseus<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
+<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
+ +<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
93' 384'<br />
98b'<br />
100aa'<br />
100ab'<br />
O<br />
+<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
+<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
390'<br />
OH<br />
98a'<br />
99ab'<br />
O O O<br />
Catharanthus<br />
roseus<br />
OH<br />
+<br />
HO<br />
93 384<br />
98a<br />
FIGURE 14.119 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-carvone (93 <strong>and</strong> 93¢) by Cataranthus roseus. (Modified<br />
from Hamada, H. <strong>and</strong> H. Yasumune, 1995. Proc. 39th TEAC, pp. 375–377; Hamada, H. et al., 1996. Proc. 40th<br />
TEAC, pp. 111–112; Kaji, M. et al., 2002. Proc. 46th TEAC, pp. 323–325.)<br />
(101a¢). Cyclohexenone derivatives (379 are 385) were treated in the same enone reductase with<br />
microsomal enzyme to give the dihydro derivative (382a, 386a) with R-configuration in excellent ee<br />
(over 99%) <strong>and</strong> the metabolites (382b, 386b) with S-configuration in relatively high ee (85% <strong>and</strong> 80%)<br />
(Shimoda et al., 2003) (Figure 14.120).<br />
TABLE 14.11<br />
Enantioselectivity in the Reduction <strong>of</strong> Enones (379 <strong>and</strong> 385) by<br />
Enone Reductase<br />
Microsomal Enzyme Substrate Product ee Configuration a<br />
– 379 382a >99 R<br />
– 385 386a >99 R<br />
+ 379 382b 85 S<br />
+ 385 386b 80 S<br />
a<br />
Preferred configuration at a-position to the carbonyl group <strong>of</strong> the products.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 661<br />
O<br />
Enone<br />
reductase<br />
O<br />
Enone<br />
reductase<br />
O<br />
Microsomal<br />
enzyme<br />
101b'<br />
93'<br />
101a'<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
382b<br />
379<br />
382a<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
386b<br />
385 386a<br />
FIGURE 14.120 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 2-methyl-2-cyclohexenone (379) <strong>and</strong> 2-ethyl-2-cyclohexenone (385)<br />
by enone reductase.<br />
In contrast, almost all the yeasts tested showed reduction <strong>of</strong> carvone, although the enzyme<br />
activity varied. The reduction <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvone (93¢) was <strong>of</strong>ten much faster than the reduction <strong>of</strong><br />
(+)-carvone (93). Some yeasts only reduced the carbon–carbon double bond to yield the dihydrocarvone<br />
isomers (101a¢ <strong>and</strong> b¢ <strong>and</strong> 101a <strong>and</strong> b) with the stereochemistry at C-1 with R configuration,<br />
while others also reduced the ketone to give the dihydrocarveols with the stereochemistry at C-2<br />
always with S for (-)-carvone (93¢), but sometimes S <strong>and</strong> sometimes R for (+)-carvone (93). In the<br />
case <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvone (93¢) yields increased up to 90% within 2 h (van Dyk et al., 1998).<br />
14.3.4.1.2 Carvotanacetone<br />
O<br />
O<br />
47<br />
S-(+)-<br />
47'<br />
R-(–)<br />
In the conversion <strong>of</strong> (+)- (47) <strong>and</strong> (-)-carvotanacetone (47¢) by Pseudomonas ovalis, strain 6-1,<br />
(-)-carvotanacetone (47¢) is converted stereospecifically to (+)-carvomenthone (48a¢) an the latter<br />
compound is further converted to (+)-neocarvomenthol (49a¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-carvomenthol (49b¢) in small<br />
amounts, whereas (+)-carvotanacetone (47) is converted mainly to (-)-isocarvomenthone (48b) <strong>and</strong><br />
(-)-neoisocarvomenthol (49d), forming (-)-carvomenthone (48a) <strong>and</strong> (-)-isocarvomenthol (49c) in<br />
small amounts as shown in Figure 14.121 (Noma et al., 1974a).<br />
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvotanacetone (47) <strong>and</strong> (+)-carvotanacetone (47¢) by Streptomyces<br />
bottropensis, SY-2-1 was carried out (Noma et al., 1985c).<br />
As shown in Figure 14.122, (+)-carvotanacetone (47) was converted by Streptomyces bottr opensis,<br />
SY-2-1 to give 5b-hydroxy-(+)-neoisocarvomenthol (139db), 5a-hydroxy-(+)-carvotanacetone<br />
(51a), 5b-hydroxy- (-)-carvomenthone (52ab), 8-hydroxy-(+)-carvotanacetone (44), <strong>and</strong> 8-hydroxy-<br />
(-)-carvomenthone (45a), whereas (-)-carvotanacetone (47¢) was converted to give 5b-hydroxy-<br />
(-)-carvotanacetone (51a¢) <strong>and</strong> 8-hydroxy-(-)-carvotanacetone (44¢).<br />
Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 converted (-)-carvotanacetone (47¢) to (+)-carvomenthone (48a¢),<br />
(+)-carvomenthone (49a¢), diastereoisomeric p-menthane-2,9-diols [55aa¢ (8R) <strong>and</strong> 55ab¢ (8S) in the
662 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
47' 49a'<br />
47<br />
48a'<br />
48b<br />
49d<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
49b'<br />
48a<br />
49c<br />
FIGURE 14.121 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvotanacetone (47¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)-carvotanacetone (47) by<br />
Pseudomonas ovalis, strain 6-1. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1974a. Agric. Biol. Chem., 38: 1637–1642.)<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
51b<br />
HO<br />
52bb<br />
HO<br />
139db<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
51a'<br />
47<br />
HO<br />
51a<br />
HO<br />
52ab<br />
47'<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
44'<br />
44<br />
OH<br />
45a<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 14.122 Proposed the metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (+)-carvotanacetone (47) <strong>and</strong> (-)-carvotanacetone<br />
(47¢) by Streptomyces bottropensis, SY-2-1. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1985c. Proc. 29th TEAC,<br />
pp. 238–240.)<br />
ratio <strong>of</strong> 3:1], <strong>and</strong> 8-hydroxy-(+)-neocarvomenthol (102a¢). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the same fungus converted<br />
(+)-carvotanacetone (47) to (-)-isocarvomenthone (48b), 1a-hydroxy-(+)- neoisocarvo menthol<br />
(54) via 1a-hydroxy-(+)-isocarvomenthone (53) <strong>and</strong> 8-hydroxy-(-)-isocarvomenthone (45b) as shown<br />
in Figure 14.123 (Noma et al., 1988b).<br />
14.3.4.1.3 Piperitone<br />
O<br />
O<br />
156<br />
R-(–)<br />
156'<br />
S-(+)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 663<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
3<br />
OH<br />
47'<br />
48a'<br />
49a'<br />
1<br />
H R<br />
55aa'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
102a'<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
S H<br />
OH<br />
55ab'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
47<br />
48b<br />
53<br />
54<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 14.123 Proposed metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvotanacetone (47) <strong>and</strong> (+)-carvotanacetone (47¢)<br />
by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1988b. Proc. 32nd TEAC, pp. 146–148.)<br />
45b<br />
OH<br />
A large number <strong>of</strong> yeasts were screened for the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-piperitone (156). A relatively<br />
small number <strong>of</strong> yeasts gave hydroxylation products <strong>of</strong> (-)-piperitone (156). Products obtained<br />
from (-)-piperitone (156) were 7-hydroxypiperitone (161), cis-6-hydroxypiperitone (158b), trans-6-<br />
hydroxypiperitone (158a), <strong>and</strong> 2-isopropyl-5-methylhydroquinone (180). Yields for the hydroxylation<br />
reactions varied between 8% <strong>and</strong> 60%, corresponding to the product concentrations <strong>of</strong><br />
0.04–0.3 g/L. Not one <strong>of</strong> the yeasts tested reduced (-)-piperitone (156) (van Dyk et al., 1998).<br />
During the initial screen with (-)-piperitone (156) only hydroxylation products were obtained. The<br />
hydroxylation products (161, 158a, <strong>and</strong> 158b) obtained with nonconventional yeasts from the genera<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
+<br />
O O OH<br />
156<br />
161 158a 180<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
158b<br />
FIGURE 14.124 Hydroxylation products <strong>of</strong> (R)-(-)-piperitone (156) by yeast. (Modified from van Dyk, M.S.<br />
et al., 1998. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 5: 149–154.)
664 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Arxula, C<strong>and</strong>ida, Yarrowia, <strong>and</strong> Trichosporon have recently been described (van Dyk et al., 1998)<br />
(Figure 14.124).<br />
14.3.4.1.4 Pulegone<br />
(R)-(+)-Pulegone (119), with a mint-like odour monoterpene ketone, is the main component (up to<br />
80–90%) <strong>of</strong> Mentha pulegium essential oil (Pennyroyal oil), which is sometimes used in beverages<br />
<strong>and</strong> food additive for human consumption <strong>and</strong> occasionally in herbal medicine as an abortifacient<br />
drug. The biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-pulegone (119) by fungi was investigated (Ismaili-Alaoui et al.,<br />
1992). Most fungal strains grown in a usual liquid culture medium were able to metabolize (+)-pulegone<br />
(119) to some extent in a concentration range <strong>of</strong> 0.1–0.5 g/L; higher concentrations were generally<br />
toxic, except for a strain <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus sp. isolated from mint leaves infusion, which was able<br />
to survive to concentrations <strong>of</strong> up to 1.5 g/L. The predominant product was generally l-hydroxy-(+)-<br />
pulegone (384) (20–30% yield). Other metabolites were present in lower amounts (5% or less) (see<br />
Figure 14.125). The formation <strong>of</strong> 1-hydroxy-(+)-pulegone (387) was explained by hydroxylation at a<br />
tertiary position. Its dehydration to piperitenone (112), even under the incubation conditions, during<br />
isolation or derivative reactions precluded any tentative determination <strong>of</strong> its optical purity <strong>and</strong> absolute<br />
configuration.<br />
Botrytis allii converted (+)-pulegone (119) to (-)-(1R)-8-hydroxy-4-p-menthen-3-one (121) <strong>and</strong><br />
piperitenone (112) (Miyazawa et al., 1991a, 1991b). Hormonema isolate (UOFS Y-0067) quantitatively<br />
reduced (+)-pulegone (119) <strong>and</strong> (-)-menthone (149a) to (+)-neomenthol (137a) (van Dyk et al.,<br />
1998) (Figure 14.125).<br />
Biotrasformation by the recombinant reductase <strong>and</strong> the transformed Escherichia coli cells were<br />
examined with pulegone, carvone, <strong>and</strong> verbenone as substrates (Figure 14.126). The recombinant<br />
reductase catalyzed the hydrogenation <strong>of</strong> the exocylic C=C double bond <strong>of</strong> pulegone (119) to give<br />
menthone derivatives (Watanabe et al., 2007) (Tables 14.12 <strong>and</strong> 14.13).<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
149a<br />
OH<br />
H +<br />
137a<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
119<br />
387 112<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH –<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
388 121<br />
389<br />
FIGURE 14.125 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-pulegone (119) by Aspergillus sp., Botrytis allii, <strong>and</strong> H. isolate<br />
(UOFS Y-0067). (Modified from Miyazawa, M. et al., 1991a. Chem. Express, 6: 479–482; Miyazawa, M.<br />
et al., 1991b. Chem. Express, 6: 873; Ismaili-Alaoui, M. et al., 1992. Tetrahedron Lett., 33: 2349–2352; van<br />
Dyk, M.S. et al., 1998. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 5: 149–154.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 665<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
24 24'<br />
119 119' 93' 93<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
149a<br />
149b<br />
149a'<br />
149b'<br />
FIGURE 14.126 Chemical structures <strong>of</strong> substrate reduced by the recombinant pulegone reductase <strong>and</strong> the<br />
transformed Esherichia coli cells.<br />
14.3.4.1.5 Piperitenone <strong>and</strong> Isopiperitenone<br />
Piperitenone (112) is metabolized to 5-hydroxypiperitenone (117), 7-hydroxypiperitenone (118), <strong>and</strong> 7,8-<br />
dihydroxypiperitone (157). Isopiperitenol (110) is reduced to give isopiperitenone (111), which is further<br />
metabolized to piperitenone (112), 7-hydroxy- (113), 10-hydroxy- (115), 4-hydroxy- (114), <strong>and</strong> 5-hydroxyisopiperitenone<br />
(116). Compounds 111 <strong>and</strong> 112 are isomerized to each other. Pulegone (119) was metabolized<br />
to 112, 8,9-dehydromenthenone (120) <strong>and</strong> 8-hydroxymenthenone (121) as shown in the<br />
biotransformation <strong>of</strong> the same substrate using Botrytis allii (Miyazawa et al., 1991b) (Figure 14.127).<br />
H. isolate (UOFS Y-0067) reduced (4S)-isopiperitenone (111) to (3R,4S)-isopiperitenol (110), a<br />
precursor <strong>of</strong> (-)-menthol (137b) (van Dyk et al., 1998) (Figure 14.128).<br />
TABLE 14.12<br />
Substrate Specificity in the Reduction <strong>of</strong> Eenones with the Recombinant<br />
Pulegone Reductase<br />
Entry No. (Reaction Time) Substrates Products Conversions (%)<br />
1 (3 h) (R)-(+)-Pulegone (119) (1R, 4R)-Isomenthone (149b) 4.4<br />
2 (12 h) (R)-Pulegone (119) (1S, 4R)-Menthone (149a) 6.8<br />
3 (3 h) (S)-(-)-Pulegone (119¢) (1R, 4R)-Isomenthone (149b) 14.3<br />
4 (12 h) (S)-Pulegone (119¢) (1S, 4R)-Menthone (149a) 15.7<br />
5 (12 h) (R)-(-)-Carvone (93¢) (1S, 4S)-Isomenthone (149b¢) 0.3<br />
6 (12 h) (S)-(+)-Carvone (93) (1R, 4S)-Menthone (149a¢) 0.5<br />
7 (12 h) (1S, 5S)-Verbenone (24) (1S, 4S)-Isomenthone (149b¢) 1.6<br />
8 (12 h) (1R, 5R)-Verbenone (24¢) (1R, 4S)-Menthone (149a¢) 2.1<br />
N.d.—denotes not detected.<br />
N.d.<br />
— N.d.<br />
— N.d.<br />
— N.d.<br />
—
666 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 14.13<br />
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Pulegone (119 <strong>and</strong> 119¢) with the<br />
Transformed Escherichia coli cells a<br />
Substrates Products Conversion (%)<br />
(R)-(+)-Pulegone (119) (1R, 4R)-Isomenthone (149b) 26.8<br />
(S)-(-)-Pulegone (119¢) (1S, 4R)-Menthone (149a) 30.0<br />
(1S, 4S)-Isomenthone (149b¢) 32.3<br />
(1R, 4S)-Menthone (149a¢) 7.1<br />
a<br />
Reaction times <strong>of</strong> the transformation reaction are 12 h.<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
113<br />
157<br />
OH<br />
117<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
110<br />
111<br />
112<br />
118<br />
120<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
116<br />
114<br />
115<br />
OH<br />
119<br />
121<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 14.127 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> isopiperitenone (111) <strong>and</strong> piperitenone (112) by Aspergillus niger<br />
TBUYN-2. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1992c. Proc. 37th TEAC, pp. 26–28.)<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
111<br />
110a<br />
137b<br />
FIGURE 14.128 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> isopiperitenone (111) by H. isolate (UOFS Y-0067). (Modified from<br />
van Dyk, M.S. et al., 1998. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 5: 149–154.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 667<br />
14.3.4.2 Saturated Ketone<br />
14.3.4.2.1 Dihydrocarvone<br />
O O O<br />
O<br />
101a'<br />
(1R,4S)<br />
(+)<br />
101b'<br />
(1S,4S)<br />
(+)-Iso<br />
101a<br />
(1S,4R)<br />
(–)<br />
101b<br />
(1R,4R)<br />
(–)-Iso<br />
In the reduction <strong>of</strong> saturated carbonyl group <strong>of</strong> dihydrocarvone by microorganism, (+)- dihydrocarvone<br />
(101a¢) is converted stereospecifically to either (+)-neodihydrocarveol (102a¢) or (-)-dihydrocarveol<br />
(102b¢) or nonstereospecifically to the mixture <strong>of</strong> 102a¢ <strong>and</strong> 102b¢, whereas (-)-isodihydrocarvone<br />
(101b) is converted stereospecifically to either (-)-neoisodihydrocarveol (102d) or (-)- isodihydro carveol<br />
(102c) or nonstereospecifically to the mixture <strong>of</strong> 102c <strong>and</strong> 102d by various microorganisms (Noma<br />
<strong>and</strong> Tatsumi, 1973; Noma et al., 1974c; Noma <strong>and</strong> Nonomura 1974; Noma, 1976, 1977).<br />
(+)-Dihydrocarvone (101a¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)-isodihydrocarvone (101b¢) are easily isomerized chemically<br />
to each other. In the microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvone (93¢), the formation <strong>of</strong> (+)- dihydrocarvone<br />
(101a¢) is predominant. (+)-Dihydrocarvone (101a¢) was reduced to both/either (+)- neodihydrocarveol<br />
(102a¢) <strong>and</strong>/or (-)-dihydrocarveol (102b), whereas in the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-carvone (93),<br />
(+)-isodihydrocarvone (101b) was formed predominantly. (+)-Isodihydrocarvone (101b) was reduced<br />
to both (+)-isodihydrocarveol (102c) <strong>and</strong> (+)-neoisodihydrocarveol (102d) (Figure 14.129).<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
102d<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
101b<br />
epimerization<br />
102c<br />
93<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
102b<br />
OH<br />
101a<br />
102a<br />
FIGURE 14.129 Proposed metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (+)-carvone (93) <strong>and</strong> (-)-isodihydrocarvone (101b) by<br />
Pseudomonas fragi, IFO 3458. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1975. Agric. Biol. Chem., 39: 437–441.)
668 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
However, Pseudomonas fragi, IFO 3458, Pseudomonas fl uorescens, IFO 3081, <strong>and</strong> Aerobacter<br />
aerogemes, IFO 3319 <strong>and</strong> IFO 12059, formed (-)-dihydrocarvone (101a) predominantly from<br />
(+)-carvone (93). In the time course study <strong>of</strong> the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-carvone (93), it appeared<br />
that predominant formation <strong>of</strong> (-)-dihydrocarvone is due to the epimerization <strong>of</strong> (-)- isodihydrocarvone<br />
(101b¢) by epimerase <strong>of</strong> Pseudomonas fragi IFO 3458 (Noma et al., 1975).<br />
14.3.4.2.2 Isodihydrocarvone Epimerase<br />
14.3.4.2.2.1 Preparation <strong>of</strong> Isodihydrocarvone Epimerase The cells <strong>of</strong> Pseudomonas fragi<br />
IFO 3458 were harvested by centrifugation <strong>and</strong> washed five times with 1/100 M KH 2 PO 4 –Na 2 HPO 4<br />
buffer (pH 7.2). Bacterial extracts were prepared from the washed cells (20 g from 3-L medium) by<br />
sonic lysis (Kaijo Denki Co., Ltd., 20Kc., 15 min, at 5–7∞C) in 100 mL <strong>of</strong> the same buffer. Sonic<br />
extracts were centrifuged at 25, 500 g for 30 min at -2∞C. The opalescent yellow supernatant fluid<br />
had the ability to convert (-)-isodihydrocarvone (101b) to (-)-dihydrocarvone (101a). On the other<br />
h<strong>and</strong>, the broken cell preparation was incapable <strong>of</strong> converting (-)-isodihydrocarvone (101b) to<br />
(-)-dihydrocarvone (101a). The enzyme was partially purified from this supernatant fluid about<br />
56-fold with heat treatment (95–97∞C for 10 min), ammonium sulfate precipitation (0.4–0.7 saturation),<br />
<strong>and</strong> DEAE-Sephadex A-50 column chromatography.<br />
The reaction mixture consisted <strong>of</strong> a mixture <strong>of</strong> (-)-isodihydrocarvone (101b) <strong>and</strong> (-)-dihydrocarvone<br />
(101a) (60:40 or 90:10), 1/30 M KH 2 PO 4 –Na 2 HPO 4 buffer (pH 7.2), <strong>and</strong> the crude or partially<br />
purified enzyme solution. The reaction was started by the addition <strong>of</strong> the enzyme solution <strong>and</strong> stopped<br />
by the addition <strong>of</strong> ether. The ether extract was applied to analytical GLC (Shimadzu Gas Chromatograph<br />
GC-4A 10% PEG-20M, 3 m ¥ 3 mm, temperature 140–170∞C at the rate <strong>of</strong> 1∞C a min, N 2 35 mL/<br />
min), <strong>and</strong> epimerization was assayed by measuring the peak areas <strong>of</strong> (-)-isodihydro carvone (101b)<br />
<strong>and</strong> (-)-dihydrocarvone (101a) in gas liquid chromatography (GLC) before <strong>and</strong> after the reaction.<br />
The crude extract <strong>and</strong> the partially purified preparation were found to be very stable to heat treatment;<br />
66% <strong>and</strong> 36% <strong>of</strong> the epimerase activity remained after treatment at 97∞C for 60 <strong>and</strong> 120 min,<br />
respectively (Noma et al., 1975).<br />
A strain <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 hydroxylated at C-1 position <strong>of</strong> (-)-isodihydrocarvone<br />
(101b) to give 1a-hydroxyisodihydrocarvone (72b), which was easily <strong>and</strong> smoothly reduced to<br />
(1S, 2S, 4S)-(-)-8-p-menthene-1,2-trans-diol (71d), which was also obtained from the biotransformation<br />
<strong>of</strong> (-)-cis-limonene-1,2-epoxide (69) by microorganisms <strong>and</strong> decomposition by 20% HCl<br />
(Figure 14.127) (Noma et al., 1985a, 1985b). Furthermore, Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 <strong>and</strong><br />
Aspergillus niger Tiegh (CBAYN) biotransformed (-)-isodihydrocarvone (101b) to give (-)-4ahydroxyisodihydrocarvone<br />
(378b) <strong>and</strong> (-)-8-p-menthene-1,2-trans-diol (71d) as the major products<br />
together with a small amount <strong>of</strong> 1a-hydroxyisodihydrocarvone (72b) (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 2008)<br />
(Figure 14.130).<br />
14.3.4.2.3 Menthone <strong>and</strong> Isomenthone<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
149a<br />
(1R,4S)<br />
(–)-Menthone<br />
149b<br />
(1S,4S)<br />
(–)-Isomenthone<br />
149a'<br />
(1S,4R)<br />
(+)-Menthone<br />
149b'<br />
(1R,4R)<br />
(+)-Isomenthone<br />
The growing cells <strong>of</strong> Pseudomonas fragi IFO 3458 epimerized 17% <strong>of</strong> racemic isomenthone<br />
(149b <strong>and</strong> b¢) to menthone (149a <strong>and</strong> a¢) (Noma et al., 1975). (-)-Menthone (149a) was converted
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 669<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
378b<br />
101b<br />
72b<br />
71d<br />
69b<br />
FIGURE 14.130 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-carvone (93), (-)-isodihydrocarvone (101b), <strong>and</strong> (-)-cis-limonene-<br />
1,2-epoxide (69b) by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus niger Tiegh (CBAYN). (Modified from<br />
Noma, Y. et al., 1985a. Annual Meeting <strong>of</strong> Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Biological Chemistry, Sapporo, p. 68; Noma, Y.<br />
<strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2008. Proc. 52nd TEAC, pp. 206–208.)<br />
by Pseudomonas fl uorescens M-2 to (-)-3-oxo-4-isopropyl-1-cyclohexanecarboxylic acid (164a),<br />
(+)-3-oxo-4-isopropyl-1-cyclohexanecarboxylic acid (164b), <strong>and</strong> (+)-3-hydroxy-4-isopropyl-1-cyclohexanecarboxylic<br />
acid (165ab). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, (+)-menthone (149a¢) was converted to give<br />
(+)-3-oxo-4-isopropyl-1-cyclohexane carboxylic acid (164a¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-3-oxo-4-isopropyl-1-<br />
cyclohexane carboxylic acid (164b¢). Racemic isomenthone (149b <strong>and</strong> b¢) was converted to give<br />
racemic 1-hydroxy-1-methyl-4-isopropylcyclohexane-3-one (150), racemic piperitone (156), racemic<br />
3-oxo-4-isopropyl-1-cyclohexene-1-carboxylic acid (162), 3-oxo-4-isopropyl-1-cyclohexane<br />
carboxylic acid (164b), 3-oxo-4-isopropyl-1-cyclohexane carbxylic acid (164a), <strong>and</strong> (+)-3-hydroxy-<br />
4-isopropyl-1-cyclohexane carboxylic acid (165ab) (Figure 14.131).<br />
Soil plant pathogenic fungi, Rhizoctonia solani 189 converted (-)-menthone (149a) to 4b-hydroxy-<br />
(-)-menthone (392, 29%) <strong>and</strong> 1 a, 4 b-dihydroxy-(-)-menthone (393, 71%) (Nonoyama et al., 1999)<br />
(Figure 14.131). (-)-Menthone (149a) was transformed by Spodoptera litura to give 7- hydroxymenthone<br />
(151a), 7-hydroxyneomenthol (165c), <strong>and</strong> 7-hydroxy-9-carboxymenthone (394a) (Hagiwara et al.,<br />
2006) (Figure 14.132). (-)-Menthone (149a) gave 7-hydroxymenthone (151a) <strong>and</strong> (+)-neomenthol<br />
(137c) by human liver microsome (CYP2B6). Of 11 recombinant human P450 enzymes (express in<br />
Trichoplusia ni cells) tested, CYP2B6 catalyzed oxidation <strong>of</strong> (-)-menthone (149a) to 7-hydroxymenthone<br />
(151a) (Nakanishi <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 2004) (Figure 14.132).<br />
14.3.4.2.4 Thujone<br />
O<br />
O<br />
4 5<br />
O<br />
4 5<br />
1<br />
1<br />
28a'<br />
28b<br />
28b'<br />
O<br />
4 5<br />
O<br />
4 5<br />
O<br />
O<br />
1<br />
1<br />
28a<br />
1S,4S,5R<br />
(+)-3-<br />
28a'<br />
1R,4R,5S<br />
(–)-3-<br />
28b<br />
1S,4R,5R<br />
(–)-3-iso<br />
28b'<br />
1R,4S,5S<br />
(+)-3-iso<br />
b-Pinene (1) is metabolized to 3-thujone (28) via a-pinene (4) (Gibbon <strong>and</strong> Pirt, 1971). a-Pinene (4)<br />
is metabolized to give thujone (28). Thujone (28) was biotransformed to thujoyl alcohol (29) by<br />
Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 (Noma, 2000). Furthermore, (-)-3-isothujone (28b) prepared from<br />
Armois oil was biotransformed by plant pathogenic fungus, Botrytis allii IFO 9430 to give<br />
4- hydroxythujone (30) <strong>and</strong> 4,6-dihydroxythujone (31) (Miyazawa et al., 1992a) (Figure 14.133).
670 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
165ab<br />
COOH<br />
149a<br />
164a<br />
O<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
164b<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
149a'<br />
151 164a'<br />
164b'<br />
HO<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
150<br />
156<br />
162<br />
149a & a'<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
164b<br />
164a<br />
165<br />
FIGURE 14.131 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)- (149a) <strong>and</strong> (+)-menthone (149a¢) <strong>and</strong> racemic isomenthone (149b<br />
<strong>and</strong> 149b¢) by Pseudomonas fl uorescens M-2. (Modified from Sawamura, Y. et al., 1974. Proc. 18th TEAC,<br />
pp. 27–29.)<br />
14.3.4.3 Cyclic Monoterpene Epoxide<br />
14.3.4.3.1 1,8-Cineole<br />
1,8-Cineole (122) is a main component <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus adiata var. australiana leaves,<br />
comprising ca. 75% in the oil, which corresponds to 31 mg/g fr.wt. leaves (Nishimura et al., 1980).<br />
The most effective utilization <strong>of</strong> 122 is very important in terms <strong>of</strong> renewable biomass production.<br />
It would be <strong>of</strong> interest, for example, to produce more valuable substances, such as plant growth regulators,<br />
by the microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> 122. The first reported utilization <strong>of</strong> 122 was presented by<br />
MacRae et al. (1979), who showed that it was a carbon source for Pseudomonas fl ava growing on<br />
Eucalyptus leaves. Growth <strong>of</strong> the bacterium in a mineral salt medium containing 122 resulted in the<br />
oxidation at the C-2 position <strong>of</strong> 122 to give the metabolites (1S,4R,6S)-(+)-2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole<br />
(225a), (1S,4R,6R)-(-)-2b-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (125a), (1S,4R)-(+)-2-oxo-1,8-cineole (126), <strong>and</strong><br />
(-)-(R)-5,5-dimethyl-4-(3¢-oxobutyl)-4,5-dihydr<strong>of</strong>uran-2(3H)-one (128) (Figure 14.134).
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 671<br />
OH<br />
R. solani<br />
+<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
392 393<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
S. litura<br />
O<br />
+ +<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
149a<br />
151a 165c<br />
394a COOH<br />
OH<br />
CYP2B6<br />
O<br />
+<br />
OH<br />
151a<br />
FIGURE 14.132 Metabolic pathway <strong>of</strong> (-)-menthone (149a) by Rhizoctonia solani 189, Spodptera litura <strong>and</strong><br />
human liver microsome (CYP2B6). (Modified from Nonoyama, H. et al., 1999. Proc. 43rd TEAC, pp. 387–<br />
388; Nakanishi, K. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2004. Proc. 48th TEAC, pp. 401–402; Hagiwara, Y. et al., 2006. Proc.<br />
50th TEAC, pp. 279–280.)<br />
137c<br />
O<br />
A.n.<br />
OH<br />
28<br />
O<br />
B. allii<br />
29<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
+<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
28b<br />
30b<br />
FIGURE 14.133 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-3-isothujone (28b) by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 <strong>and</strong> plant<br />
pathogenic fungus, Botrytis allii IFO 9430. (Modified from Gibbon, G.H. <strong>and</strong> S.J. Pirt, 1971. FEBS Lett., 18:<br />
103–105; Miyazawa, M. et al., 1992a. Proc. 36th TEAC, pp. 197–198.)<br />
31b<br />
P. flava<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
+<br />
+<br />
O<br />
+<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
122 125a 125b<br />
126<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
128<br />
H<br />
FIGURE 14.134 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole (84) by Pseudomonas fl ava. (Modified from MacRae, I.C.<br />
et al., 1979. Aust. J. Chem., 32: 917–922.)
672 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
HO<br />
S. bottropensis<br />
O<br />
+<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
125b Major<br />
123b Minor<br />
122<br />
O<br />
S. ikutamanensis<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
+<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
123b<br />
46%<br />
123a<br />
29%<br />
FIGURE 14.135 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole (122) by Streptomyces bottropensis SY-2-1 <strong>and</strong><br />
Streptomyces ikutamanensis Ya-2-1. (Modified from Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> H. Nishimura, 1980. Annual Meeting <strong>of</strong><br />
Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Biological Chemical Society, Book <strong>of</strong> abstracts, p. 28; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> H. Nishimura, 1981.<br />
Annual Meeting <strong>of</strong> Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Biological Chemical Society, Book <strong>of</strong> abstracts, p. 196.)<br />
Streptomyces bottropensis, SY-2-1 biotransformed 1,8-cineole (122) stereochemically to<br />
(+)-2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (125b) as the major product <strong>and</strong> (+)-3a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (123b) as<br />
the minor product. Recovery ratio <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole metabolites as ether extract was ca. 30% in<br />
Streptomyces bottropensis, SY-2-1 (Noma <strong>and</strong> Nishimura, 1980, 1981) (Figure 14.135).<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> Streptomyces ikutamanensis, Ya-2-1 1,8-cineole (122) was biotransformed regioselectively<br />
to give (+)-3a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (123b, 46%) <strong>and</strong> (+)-3b-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (123b, 29%)<br />
as the major product. Recovery ratio as ether extract was ca. 8.5% in Streptomyces ikutamanensis,<br />
Ya-2-1 (Noma <strong>and</strong> Nishimura, 1980, 1981) (Figure 14.135).<br />
When (+)-3a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (123b) was used as substrate in the cultured medium <strong>of</strong><br />
Streptomyces ikutamanensis, Ya-2-1, (+)-3b-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (123a, 32%) was formed as the major<br />
product together with a small amount <strong>of</strong> (+)-3-oxo-1,8-cineole (126a, 1.6%). When (+)-3b-hydroxy-1,8-<br />
cineole (123a) was used, (+)-3-oxo-1,8-cineole (126a, 9.6%) <strong>and</strong> (+)-3a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (123b,<br />
2%) were formed. When (+)-3-oxo-1,8-cineole (126a) was used, (+)-3a-hydroxy- (123b, 19%) <strong>and</strong><br />
(+)-3b-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (123a, 16%) were formed.<br />
Based on the above results, it is obvious that (+)-3b-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (123b) is formed mainly<br />
in the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole (122), (+)-3a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (123b), <strong>and</strong> (+)-3-oxo-1,8-<br />
cineole (126a) by Streptomyces ikutamanensis, Ya-2-1. The production <strong>of</strong> (+)-3b-hydroxy-1,8-cineole<br />
(123b) is interesting, because it is a precursor <strong>of</strong> mosquito repellent, p-menthane-3,8-diol<br />
(142aa¢) (Noma <strong>and</strong> Nishimura, 1981) (Figure 14.136).<br />
When Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 was cultured in the presence <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole (122) for 7 days,<br />
it was transformed to three alcohols [racemic 2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineoles (125b <strong>and</strong> b¢), racemic<br />
3a-hydroxy- (123b <strong>and</strong> b¢), <strong>and</strong> racemic 3b-hydroxy-1,8-cineoles (123a <strong>and</strong> 123a¢)] <strong>and</strong> two ketones<br />
[racemic 2-oxo- (126 <strong>and</strong> 126¢) <strong>and</strong> racemic 3-oxo-1,8-cineoles (124 <strong>and</strong> 124¢)] (Figure 14.135). The<br />
formation <strong>of</strong> 3a-hydroxy- (123b <strong>and</strong> b¢) <strong>and</strong> 3b-hydroxy-1,8-cineoles (123a <strong>and</strong> 123a¢) is <strong>of</strong> great<br />
interest not only due to the possibility <strong>of</strong> the formation <strong>of</strong> p-menthane-3,8-diol (142 <strong>and</strong> 142¢), the<br />
mosquito repellents <strong>and</strong> plant growth regulators that are synthesized chemically from 3a-hydroxy-<br />
(123b <strong>and</strong> b¢) <strong>and</strong> 3b-hydroxy-1,8-cineoles (123a <strong>and</strong> 123a¢), respectively, but also from the viewpoint<br />
<strong>of</strong> the utilization <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus adiata var. australiana leaves oil as biomass. An Et 2 O extract<br />
<strong>of</strong> the culture broth (products <strong>and</strong> 122 as substrate) was recovered in 57% <strong>of</strong> substrate (w/w)<br />
(Nishimura et al., 1982; Noma et al., 1996) (Figure 14.137).
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 673<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
122<br />
O<br />
46%<br />
29%<br />
123b<br />
O<br />
126a<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
123a<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
142aa'<br />
FIGURE 14.136 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole (122), (+)-3a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (123b), (+)-3b-hydroxy-<br />
1,8-cineole(123a), <strong>and</strong> (+)-3-oxo-1,8-cineole (126a) by Streptomyces ikutamanensis, Ya-2-1. (Modified from<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> H. Nishimura, 1981. Annual Meeting <strong>of</strong> Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Biological Chemical Society, Book<br />
<strong>of</strong> abstracts, p. 196.)<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
126<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
125a<br />
125a'<br />
OH<br />
126'<br />
O<br />
O<br />
125b<br />
122<br />
O<br />
125b'<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
123a<br />
123a'<br />
O<br />
O<br />
124<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
124'<br />
123b<br />
123b'<br />
FIGURE 14.137 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole (122) by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2. (Modified from<br />
Nishimura, H. et al., 1982. Agric. Biol. Chem., 46: 2601–2604; Noma, Y. et al., 1996. Proc. 40th TEAC,<br />
pp. 89–91.)
674 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
HO<br />
B. dothidea<br />
O<br />
+<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
+<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
125b<br />
123b'<br />
123b<br />
OH<br />
122<br />
O<br />
S. litura<br />
HO<br />
S. typhimurium<br />
HO<br />
125b<br />
123a<br />
O<br />
O<br />
+<br />
+<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
125a<br />
O<br />
O<br />
+ + +<br />
HO<br />
O O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
123b 395 127b<br />
FIGURE 14.138 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole (122) by Botryosphaeria dothidea, Spodptera litura, <strong>and</strong><br />
Salmonella typhimurium. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1996. Proc. 40th TEAC, pp. 89–91; Saito, H. <strong>and</strong><br />
M. Miyazawa, 2006. Proc. 50th TEAC, pp. 275–276; Hagiwara, Y. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2007. Proc. 51st TEAC,<br />
pp. 304–305.)<br />
125a<br />
Plant pathogenic fungus Botryosphaeria dothidea converted 1,8-cineole (122) to optical pure<br />
(+)-2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (125b) <strong>and</strong> racemic 3a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (123b <strong>and</strong> b¢), which were<br />
oxidized to optically active 2-oxo- (126) (100% ee) <strong>and</strong> racemic 3-oxo-1,8-cineole (124 <strong>and</strong> 124¢),<br />
respectively (Table 14.14). Cytochrome P-450 inhibitor, 1-aminobenzotriazole, inhibited the hydroxylation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the substrate (Noma et al., 1996) (Figure 14.138). Spodptera litura also converted 1,8-<br />
cineole (122) to give three secondary alcohols (123b, 125a, <strong>and</strong> b) <strong>and</strong> two primary alcohols (395<br />
<strong>and</strong> 127) (Hagihara <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 2007). Salmonella typhimurium OY1001/3A4 <strong>and</strong> NADPH-<br />
P450 reductase hydroxylated 1,8-cineole (122) to 2b-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (125a, [a] D + 9.3, 65.3%<br />
ee) <strong>and</strong> 3b-hydroxy-1, 8-cineole (123a, [a] D -27.8, 24.7% ee) (Saito <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 2006).<br />
Extraction <strong>of</strong> the urinary metabolites from brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) maintained<br />
on a diet <strong>of</strong> fruit impregnated with 1,8-cineole (122) yielded p-cresol (129) <strong>and</strong> the novel C-9<br />
oxidated products 9-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (127a) <strong>and</strong> 1,8-cineole-9-oic acid (462a) (Flynn <strong>and</strong><br />
Southwell, 1979; Southwell <strong>and</strong> Flynn, 1980) (Figure 14.139).<br />
1,8-Cineole (122) gave 2b-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (125a) by CYP-450 human <strong>and</strong> rat liver<br />
microsome. Cytochrome P450 molecular species responsible for metabolism <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole (122)<br />
was determined to be CYP3A4 <strong>and</strong> CYP3A1/2 in human <strong>and</strong> rat, respectively. Kinetic analysis<br />
showed that K m <strong>and</strong> V max values for the oxidation <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole (122) by human <strong>and</strong> rat treated with<br />
T. vulpecula<br />
+ +<br />
O<br />
122 127a<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
COOH<br />
462a<br />
OH<br />
129<br />
FIGURE 14.139 Metabolism <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole in Trichosurus vulpecula. (Modified from Southwell, I.A. <strong>and</strong><br />
T.M. Flynn, 1980. Xenobiotica, 10: 17–23.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 675<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
122<br />
68<br />
68<br />
A. niger<br />
A. niger<br />
B. dothidea<br />
P. flava<br />
G. cyanea<br />
P. digitatum<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
G. cingulata<br />
HO<br />
+<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
hydrolysis<br />
125b<br />
125b'<br />
125b<br />
130b'<br />
125b'<br />
(1S, 2S, 4R)<br />
[α] D + 29.6<br />
FIGURE 14.140 Formation <strong>of</strong> 2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineoles (125b <strong>and</strong> b¢) from 1,8-cineole (122) <strong>and</strong> optical<br />
resolution by Glomerella cingulata <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 <strong>and</strong> 125b¢ from (+)-limonene (68)<br />
by Pencillium digitatum. (Modified from Nishimura, H. et al., 1982. Agric. Biol. Chem., 46: 2601–2604;<br />
Abraham, W.-R. et al., 1986. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 24: 24–30; Miyazawa, M. et al., 1995b. Proc. 39th<br />
TEAC, pp. 352–353; Noma, Y. et al., 1986. Proc. 30th TEAC, pp. 204–206; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2007a.<br />
Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 38th ISEO, p. 7.)<br />
pregnenolone-16a-carbonitrile (PCN), recombinant CYP3A4 were determined to be 50 mM <strong>and</strong><br />
90.9 nmol/min/nmol P450, 20 mM <strong>and</strong> 11.5 nmol/min/nmol P450, <strong>and</strong> 90 mM <strong>and</strong> 47.6 nmol/min/<br />
nmol P450, respectively (Shindo et al., 2000).<br />
Microbial resolution <strong>of</strong> racemic 2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineoles (125b <strong>and</strong> b¢) was carried out by using<br />
Glomerella cingulata. The mixture <strong>of</strong> 125b <strong>and</strong> b¢ was added to a culture <strong>of</strong> Glomerella cingulata<br />
<strong>and</strong> esterified to give after 24 h (1R,2R,4S)-2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole-2-yl-malonate (130b¢) in 45%<br />
yield (ee 100%). The recovered alcohol showed 100% ee <strong>of</strong> the (1S,2S,4R)-enantiomer (125b)<br />
(Miyazawa et al., 1995b). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, optically active (+)-2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (125b) was<br />
also formed from (+)-limonene (68) by a strain <strong>of</strong> Citrus pathogenic fungus Penicillium digitatum<br />
(Saito <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa 2006, Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa 2007a) (Figure 14.140).<br />
Esters <strong>of</strong> racemic 2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (125b <strong>and</strong> b¢) were prepared by a convenient method<br />
(Figure 14.141). Their odours were characteristic. Then products were tested against antimicrobial<br />
activity <strong>and</strong> their microbial resolution was studied (Hashimoto <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 2001) (Table 14.15).<br />
1,8-Cineole (122) was glucosylated by Eucalyptus perriniana suspension cells to 2a-hydroxy-1,8-<br />
cineole monoglucoside (404, 16.0% <strong>and</strong> 404¢, 16.0%) <strong>and</strong> diglucosides (405, 1.4%) (Hamada et al.,<br />
2002) (Figure 14.142).<br />
14.3.4.3.2 1,4-Cineole<br />
Regarding the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1,4-cineole (131), Streptomyces griseus transformed it to<br />
8-hydroxy-1,4-cineole (134), whereas Bacillus cereus transformed 1,4-cineole (131) to 2a-hydroxy-1,4-<br />
cineole (132b, 3.8%) <strong>and</strong> 2b-hydroxy-1,4-cineoles (132a, 21.3%) (Liu et al., 1988) (Figure 14.144). On<br />
the other h<strong>and</strong>, a strain <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus niger biotransformed 1,4-cineole (131) regiospecifically to<br />
2a-hydroxy-1,4-cineole (132b) (Miyazawa et al., 1991c) <strong>and</strong> (+)-3a-hydroxy-1,4-cineole (133b)<br />
(Miyazawa et al., 1992b) along with the formation <strong>of</strong> 8-hydroxy-1,4-cineole (134) <strong>and</strong> 9-hydroxy-1,4-<br />
cineole (135) (Miyazawa et al., 1992c) (Figure 14.144).
676 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
MCPBA in dichloromethane<br />
O<br />
O<br />
Acid chloride, Pyridine<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
34a<br />
34a'<br />
125b'<br />
125b<br />
O<br />
O<br />
R O<br />
O R R=CH 3 (396)<br />
O<br />
125b's Ester<br />
O<br />
125b Ester<br />
C 2 H 5 (397)<br />
C 3 H 7 (398)<br />
C 4 H 9 (399)<br />
CH(CH 3 )2(400)<br />
C(CH 3 ) 3 (401)<br />
CH 2 CH(CH 3 ) 2 (402)<br />
CH 2 C(CH 3 ) 3 (403)<br />
FIGURE 14.141 Chemical synthesis <strong>of</strong> esters <strong>of</strong> racemic 2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (125b <strong>and</strong> b¢). (Modified<br />
from Hashimoto Y. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2001. Proc. 45th TEAC, pp. 363–365.)<br />
Microbial optical resolution <strong>of</strong> racemic 2a-hydroxy-1,4-cineoles (132b <strong>and</strong> b¢) was carried out<br />
by using Glomerella cingulata (Liu et al., 1988). The mixture <strong>of</strong> 2a-hydroxy-1,4-cineoles (132b <strong>and</strong><br />
b¢) was added to a culture <strong>of</strong> Glomerella cingulata <strong>and</strong> esterified to give after 24 h (1R,2R,4S)-2ahydroxy-1,4-cineole-2-yl<br />
malonate (136¢) in 45% yield (ee 100%). The recovered alcohol showed<br />
an ee <strong>of</strong> 100% <strong>of</strong> the (1S,2S,4R)-enantiomer (132b). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, optically active (+)-2ahydroxy-1,4-cineole<br />
(132b) was also formed from (-)-terpinen-4-ol (342) by Gibberella cyanea<br />
DSM (Abraham et al., 1986) <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 2007b)<br />
(Figure 14.145).<br />
TABLE 14.14<br />
Stereoselectivity in the Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1,8-Cineole (122) by Aspergillus<br />
niger, Botryosphaeria dothidea, <strong>and</strong> Pseudomonas flava<br />
Products<br />
Microorganisms 125a <strong>and</strong> a′, 125b <strong>and</strong> b′, 123b <strong>and</strong> b′, 123a <strong>and</strong> a′<br />
Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 2:43:49:6<br />
50:50 41:59<br />
Botryosphaeria dothidea 4:59:34:3<br />
100:0 53:47<br />
Pseudomonas fl ava 29:71:0:0<br />
100:0<br />
Source: Noma, Y. et al., 1996. Proc. 40th TEAC, pp. 89–91.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 677<br />
TABLE 14.15<br />
Yield <strong>and</strong> Enantiomer Excess <strong>of</strong> Esters <strong>of</strong> Racemic 2α-Hydroxy-<br />
1,8-Cineole (125b <strong>and</strong> b¢) on the Microbial Resolution by<br />
Glomerella cingulata<br />
0 h 24 h 48 h<br />
Compounds %ee %ee Yield (%) %ee Yield (%)<br />
396 (−)36.3 (+)85.0 24.0 (+)100 14.1<br />
397 (−)36.9 (+)73.8 18.6 (+)100 8.6<br />
398 (−)35.6 (+)33.2 13.7 (+)75.4 3.5<br />
399 (−)36.8 (+)45.4 14.4 (+)100 2.3<br />
400 (−)35.4 (−)21.4 25.2 (+)20.6 8.0<br />
401 (−)36.7 (−)37.8 31.5 (−)40.6 15.2<br />
402 (−)36.1 (−)29.8 46.8 (−)15.0 24.0<br />
403 (−)36.3 (−)37.6 72.2 (−)39.0 36.9<br />
Source: Hashimoto Y. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2001. Proc. 45th TEAC, pp. 363–365.<br />
14.4 METABOLIC PATHWAYS OF BICYCLIC MONOTERPENOIDS<br />
14.4.1 BICYCLIC MONOTERPENE<br />
14.4.1.1 α-Pinene<br />
4 4'<br />
(+)-α-Pinene (–)-α-Pinene<br />
a-Pinene (4 <strong>and</strong> 4¢) is the most abundant terpene in nature <strong>and</strong> obtained industrially by fractional<br />
distillation <strong>of</strong> turpentine (Krasnobajew, 1984). (+)-a-Pinene (4) occurs in oil <strong>of</strong> Pinus palustris<br />
Mill. at concentrations <strong>of</strong> up to 65%, <strong>and</strong> in oil <strong>of</strong> Pinus caribaea at concentrations <strong>of</strong> 70% (Bauer<br />
et al., 1990). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, Pinus caribaea contains (-)-a-pinene (4¢) at the concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
70–80% (Bauer et al., 1990).<br />
The biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-a-pinene (4) was investigated by Aspergillus niger NCIM 612<br />
(Bhattacharyya et al., 1960, Prema <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya, 1962). A 24 h shake culture <strong>of</strong> this strain<br />
metabolized 0.5% (+)-a-pinene (4) in 4–8 h. After the fermentation <strong>of</strong> the culture broth contained<br />
(+)-verbenone (24) (2–3%), (+)-cis-verbenol (23b) (20–25%), (+)-trans-sobrerol (43a) (2–3%), <strong>and</strong><br />
Glu-Glu-O<br />
Glu-O<br />
O-Glc<br />
+<br />
E. perriniana E. perriniana<br />
O<br />
O O O<br />
405 404<br />
122<br />
404'<br />
FIGURE 14.142 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole (122) by Eucalyptus perriniana suspension cell. (Modified<br />
from Hamada, H. et al., 2002. Proc. 46th TEAC, pp. 321–322.)
678 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
132a<br />
(1S, 2R, 4R)<br />
O<br />
132a'<br />
(1R, 2S, 4S)<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
132b<br />
[α] D +19.6 (1S, 2S, 4R)<br />
O<br />
132b'<br />
(1R, 2R, 4S) [α] D –19.6<br />
131<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
133a<br />
(1S, 3S, 4R)<br />
133a'<br />
(1R, 3R, 4S)<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
133b<br />
(1S, 3R, 4R)<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
133b'<br />
(1R, 3S, 4S)<br />
FIGURE 14.143 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> 1,4-cineole (131) by microorganisms<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
B. cereus<br />
O<br />
+<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
406<br />
A.n.<br />
131<br />
O<br />
S. griseus<br />
A.n.<br />
A.n.<br />
B. cereus<br />
HO<br />
132a<br />
O<br />
132b<br />
+<br />
132a'<br />
O<br />
132b'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
134<br />
O<br />
A.n.<br />
O<br />
O<br />
135<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
133b<br />
+<br />
133b'<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 14.144 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> 1,4-cineole (131) by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2, Bacillus cereus,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Streptomyces griseus. (Modified from Liu, W. et al., 1988. J. Org. Chem., 53: 5700–5704; Miyazawa, M.<br />
et al., 1991c. Chem. Express, 6: 771–774; Miyazawa, M. et al., 1992b. Chem. Express, 7: 305–308; Miyazawa,<br />
M. et al., 1992c. Chem. Express, 7: 125–128; Miyazawa, M. et al., 1995b. Proc. 39th TEAC, pp. 352–353.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 679<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
131<br />
342<br />
HO<br />
A. niger<br />
O<br />
O<br />
A. niger<br />
OH<br />
G. cingulata<br />
HO<br />
A. niger<br />
G. cyanea<br />
O<br />
+<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
132b 132b'<br />
rac-132b & b'<br />
[α] D +0.13<br />
132b'<br />
132b<br />
136'<br />
(1R, 2R, 4S)<br />
(1S, 2S, 4R)<br />
[α] D –19.6<br />
[α] D +19.6<br />
FIGURE 14.145 Formation <strong>of</strong> optically active 2a-hydroxycineole from 1,4-cineole (131) <strong>and</strong> terpinene-<br />
4-ol (342) by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2, Gibberella cyanea, <strong>and</strong> Glomerella cingulata. (Modified from<br />
Abraham, W.-R. et al., 1986. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 24: 24–30; Miyazawa, M. et al., 1991c. Chem.<br />
Express, 6: 771–774; Miyazawa, M. et al., 1995b. Proc. 39th TEAC, pp. 352–353; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa,<br />
2007b. Proc. 51st TEAC, pp. 299–301.)<br />
(+)-8-hydroxycarvotanacetone (44) (Bhattacharyya et al., 1960; Prema <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya 1962<br />
(Figure 14.146).<br />
The degradation <strong>of</strong> (+)-a-pinene (4) by a soil Pseudomonas sp. (PL strain) was investigated by<br />
Hungund et al. (1970). A terminal oxidation pattern was proposed, leading to the formation <strong>of</strong><br />
organic acids through ring cleavage. (+)-a-Pinene (4) was fermented in shake cultures by a soil<br />
Pseudomonas sp. (PL strain) that is able to grow on (+)-a-pinene (4) as the sole carbon source, <strong>and</strong><br />
borneol (36), myrtenol (5), myrtenic acid (84), <strong>and</strong> a-phell<strong>and</strong>ric acid (65) (Shukla <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya,<br />
1968) (Figure 14.147) were obtained.<br />
The degradation <strong>of</strong> (+)-a-pinene (4) by Pseudomonas fl uorescens NCIMB11671 was studied <strong>and</strong><br />
a pathway for the microbial breakdown <strong>of</strong> (+)-a-pinene (4) was proposed as shown in Figure 14.148<br />
(Best et al., 1987; Best <strong>and</strong> Davis, 1988). The attack <strong>of</strong> oxygen is initiated by enzymatic oxygenation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 1,2-double bond to form a-pinene epoxide (38), which then undergoes rapid rearrangement<br />
to produce a unsaturated aldehyde, occurring as two isomeric forms. The primary product <strong>of</strong> the<br />
reaction (Z)-2-methyl-5-isopropylhexa-2,5-dien-1-al (39, isonovalal) can undergo chemical isomerization<br />
to the E-form (novalal, 40). Isonovalal (39), the native form <strong>of</strong> the aldehyde, possesses<br />
citrus, woody, spicy notes, whereas novallal (40) has woody, aldehydic, <strong>and</strong> cyclone notes. The same<br />
biotransformation was also carried out by Nocardia sp. strain P18.3 (Griffiths et al., 1987a, b).<br />
Pseudomonas PL strain <strong>and</strong> PIN 18 degradated a-pinene (4) by the pathway proposed in<br />
Figure 14.149 to give two hydrocarbon, limonene (68) <strong>and</strong> terpinolene (346), <strong>and</strong> neutral metabolite,<br />
+ + +<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
4 23b 24<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 14.146 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-a-pinene (4) by Aspergillus niger NCIM 612. (Modified from<br />
Bhattacharyya, P.K. et al., 1960. Nature, 187: 689–690; Prema, B.R. <strong>and</strong> P.K. Bhattachayya, 1962. Appl.<br />
Microbiol., 10: 524–528.)<br />
OH<br />
43a 44<br />
OH<br />
O
680 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
OH COOH COOH<br />
+ + +<br />
4 36 5 7<br />
FIGURE 14.147 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-a-pinene (4) by Pseudomonas sp. (PL strain). (Modified from<br />
Shukla, O.P., <strong>and</strong> P.K. Bhattacharyya, 1968. Indian J. Biochem., 5: 92–101.)<br />
65<br />
CHO<br />
O<br />
CHO<br />
FIGURE 14.148 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-a-pinene (4) by Pseudomonas fl uorescens NCIMB 11671.<br />
(Modified from Best, D.J. et al., 1987. Biotransform., 1: 147–159.)<br />
borneol (36). A probable pathway has been proposed for the terminal oxidation <strong>of</strong> b-isopropylpimelic<br />
acid (248) in the PL strain <strong>and</strong> PIN 18 (Shukala <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya, 1968).<br />
Pseudomonas PX 1 biotransformed (+)-a-pinene (4) to give (+)-cis-thujone (29) <strong>and</strong> (+)-transcarveol<br />
(81a) as major compounds. Compounds 81a, 171, 173, <strong>and</strong> 178 have been identified as<br />
fermentation products (Gibbon <strong>and</strong> Pirt, 1971; Gibbon et al., 1972) (Figure 14.150).<br />
Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 biotransformed (-)-a-pinene (4¢) to give (-)-a-terpineol (34¢) <strong>and</strong><br />
(-)-trans-sobrerol (43a¢) (Noma et al., 2001). The mosquitocidal (+)-(1R,2S,4R)-1-p-menthane-2,8-<br />
diol (50a¢) was also obtained as a crystal in the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-a-pinene (4¢) by Aspergillus<br />
niger TBUYN-2 (Noma et al., 2001; Noma, 2007) (Figure 14.151).<br />
(1R)-(+)-a-Pinene (4) <strong>and</strong> its enantiomer (4¢) were fed to Spodptera litura to give the corresponding<br />
(+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-verbenones (24 <strong>and</strong> 24¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-myrtenols (5 <strong>and</strong> 5¢) (Miyazawa<br />
et al., 1996c) (Figure 14.152).<br />
(-)-a-Pinene (4¢) was treated in human liver microsomes CYP 2B6 to afford (-)-trans-verbenol<br />
(23¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-myrtenol (5¢) (Sugie <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 2003) (Figure 14.153).<br />
In rabbit, (+)-a-pinene (4) was metabolized to (-)-trans-verbenols (23) as the main metabolites<br />
together with myrtenol (5) <strong>and</strong> myrtenic acid (7). The purities <strong>of</strong> (-)-verbenol (23) from (-)- (4¢),<br />
(+)- (4), <strong>and</strong> (+/-)-a-pinene (4 <strong>and</strong> 4¢) was 99%, 67%, <strong>and</strong> 68%, respectively. This means that the<br />
biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-4¢ in rabbit is remarkably efficient in the preparation <strong>of</strong> (-)-trans-verbenol<br />
(23a) (Ishida et al., 1981b) (Figure 14.154).<br />
(-)-a-Pinene (4¢) was biotransformed by the plant pathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea to afford<br />
3a-hydroxy-(-)-b-pinene (2a¢, 10%), 8-hydroxy-(-)-a-pinene (434¢, 12%), 4b-hydroxy-(-)-pinene-<br />
6-one (468¢, 16%), <strong>and</strong> (-)-verbenone (24¢) (Farooq et al., 2002) (Figure 14.155).<br />
14.4.1.2 β-Pinene<br />
4 38 39 40<br />
1<br />
(+)-β-Pinene<br />
1'<br />
(–)-β-Pinene
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 681<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
4<br />
5<br />
7<br />
+<br />
+<br />
HO<br />
COOH<br />
1 32<br />
COOH<br />
35<br />
36<br />
(–)-from 1<br />
(+)-from 4<br />
COOH<br />
(–)-from 1<br />
(+)-from 4<br />
86<br />
68<br />
+<br />
33<br />
61<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
?<br />
OH<br />
+<br />
H –<br />
346<br />
83<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
464<br />
463<br />
59<br />
COOH<br />
62 65 248<br />
(–)-from 1 <strong>and</strong> 4<br />
FIGURE 14.149 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> degradation <strong>of</strong> a- <strong>and</strong> b-pinene by a soil Pseudomonad (PL strain)<br />
<strong>and</strong> Pseudomonas PIN 18. (Modified from Shukla, O.P., <strong>and</strong> P.K. Bhattacharyya, 1968. Indian J. Biochem.,<br />
5: 92–101.)<br />
(+)-b-Pinene (1) is found in many essential oils. Optically active <strong>and</strong> racemic b-pinene are present<br />
in turpentine oils, although in smaller quantities than (+)-a-pinene (4) (Bauer et al., 1990).<br />
Shukla et al. (1968) obtained a similarly complex mixture <strong>of</strong> transformation products from<br />
(-)-b-pinene (1¢) through degradation by a Pseudomonas sp/(PL strain). On the other h<strong>and</strong>,<br />
Bhattacharyya <strong>and</strong> Ganapathy (1965) indicated that Aspergillus niger NCIM 612 acts differently<br />
<strong>and</strong> more specifically on the pinenes by preferably oxidizing (-)-b-pinene (1¢) in the allylic position<br />
to form the interesting products pinocarveol (2¢) <strong>and</strong> pinocarvone (3¢), besides myrtenol (5¢)<br />
(see Figure 14.156). Furthermore, the conversion <strong>of</strong> (-)-b-pinene (1¢) by Pseudomonas putidaarvilla<br />
(PL strain) gave borneol (36¢) (Rama Devi <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya, 1978) (Figure 14.156).<br />
Pseudomonas pseudomallai isolated from local sewage sludge by the enrichment culture technique<br />
utilized caryophyllene as the sole carbon source (Dhavlikar et al., 1974). Fermentation <strong>of</strong><br />
(-)-b-pinene (1¢) by Pseudomonas pseudomallai in a mineral salt medium (Seubert’s medium) at
682 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
4<br />
29<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
81a<br />
+<br />
42 46a<br />
47<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
173<br />
172<br />
171<br />
56<br />
COOH<br />
HO<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
174 175 176<br />
178<br />
FIGURE 14.150 Proposed metabolic pathways for (+)-a-pinene (4) degradation by Pseudomonas PX 1.<br />
(Modified from Gibbon, G.H. <strong>and</strong> S.J. Pirt, 1971. FEBS Lett., 18: 103–105; Gibbon, G.H. et al., 1972. Proc. IV<br />
IFS, Ferment. Technol. Today, pp. 609–612.)<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
A. niger A. niger A. niger<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
4'<br />
34'<br />
43a'<br />
50a'<br />
FIGURE 14.151 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-a-pinene (4) by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2. (Modified from<br />
Noma, Y. et al., 2001. Proc. 45th TEAC, pp. 88–90.)<br />
30 ∞ C with agitation <strong>and</strong> aeration for 4 days yielded camphor (37¢), borneol (36a¢), isoborneol (36b¢),<br />
a-terpineol (34¢), <strong>and</strong> b-isopropyl pimelic acid (248¢) (see Figure 14.154). Using modified Czapek-<br />
Dox medium <strong>and</strong> keeping the other conditions the same, the pattern <strong>of</strong> the metabolic products was<br />
dramatically changed. The metabolites were trans-pinocarveol (2¢), myrtenol (5¢), a-fenchol (11¢),<br />
a-terpineol (34¢), myrtenic acid (7¢), <strong>and</strong> two unidentified products (see Figure 14.157).<br />
(-)-b-Pinene (1¢) was converted by plant pathogenic fungi, Botrytis cinerea, to give four new compounds<br />
such as (-)-pinane-2a,3a-diol (408¢), (-)-6b-hydroxypinene (409¢), (-)-4a,5-dihydroxypinene<br />
(410¢), <strong>and</strong> (-)-4a-hydroxypinen-6-one (411¢) (Figure 14.158).<br />
This study progressed further biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-pinane-2a,3a-diol (408¢) <strong>and</strong> related<br />
compounds by microorganisms as shown in Figure 14.158.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 683<br />
OH<br />
S. litura<br />
O<br />
4 24 5<br />
+<br />
OH<br />
4'<br />
S. litura<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 14.152 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)- (4) <strong>and</strong> (-)-a-pinene (4¢) by Spodptera litura. (Modified from<br />
Miyazawa, M. et al., 1996c. Proc. 40th TEAC, pp. 84–85.)<br />
24'<br />
+<br />
5'<br />
OH<br />
4'<br />
P450 2B6<br />
HO<br />
FIGURE 14.153 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-a-pinene (4¢) by human liver microsomes CYP 2B6. (Modified<br />
from Sugie, A. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2003. Proc. 47th TEAC, pp. 159–161.)<br />
23'<br />
+<br />
5'<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
Rabbit<br />
OH<br />
4 23a 5<br />
+<br />
+<br />
7<br />
Rabbit<br />
4'<br />
HO<br />
23a'<br />
FIGURE 14.154 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> a-pinene by rabbit. (Modified from Ishida, T. et al., 1981b. J. Pharm.<br />
Sci., 70: 406–415.)<br />
B. cinerea<br />
HO<br />
+<br />
+<br />
O<br />
4'<br />
24'<br />
2a'<br />
OH<br />
434'<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
468'<br />
FIGURE 14.155 Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-a-pinene (4¢) by Botrytis cinerea. (Modified from Farooq,<br />
A. et al., 2002. Z. Naturforsch., 57c: 686–690.)<br />
+
684 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
A. niger<br />
NCIM<br />
612<br />
O<br />
+ +<br />
2' 3' 5'<br />
1'<br />
P. pudidaarvilla<br />
PL strain<br />
OH<br />
36'<br />
FIGURE 14.156 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-b-pinene (1¢) by Aspergillus niger NCIM 612 <strong>and</strong> Pseudomonas<br />
putida-arvilla (PL strain). (Modified from Bhattacharyya, P.K. <strong>and</strong> K. Ganapathy, 1965. Indian J. Biochem.,<br />
2: 137–145; Rama Devi, J. <strong>and</strong> P.K. Bhattacharyya, 1978. J. Indian Chem. Soc., 55: 1131–1137.)<br />
COOH<br />
P.p.<br />
Seubert<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
+ +<br />
O<br />
+<br />
OH<br />
+<br />
COOH<br />
36b' 36a' 37'<br />
34'<br />
248'<br />
1'<br />
P.p.<br />
HO<br />
Czapek-dox<br />
2'<br />
+<br />
5'<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
+ +<br />
FIGURE 14.157 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-b-pinene (1¢) by Pseudomonas pseudomallai. (Modified from<br />
Dhavalikar, R.S. et al., 1974. Dragoco Rep., 3: 47–49.)<br />
7'<br />
HO<br />
11b'<br />
+<br />
34'<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
1'<br />
B.c.<br />
+ + +<br />
OH HO<br />
HO<br />
408' 409' 410' OH<br />
411'<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 14.158 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-b-pinene (1¢) by Botrytis cinerea. (Modified from Farooq, A.<br />
et al., 2002. Z. Naturforsch., 57c: 686–690.)<br />
As shown in Figure 14.159, (+)- (1) <strong>and</strong> (-)-b-pinenes (1¢) were biotransformed by Aspergillus<br />
niger TBUYN-2 to give (+)-a-terpineol (34) <strong>and</strong> (+)-oleuropeyl alcohol (204) <strong>and</strong> their antipodes<br />
(34¢ <strong>and</strong> 204¢), respectively. The hydroxylation process <strong>of</strong> a-terpineol (34) to oleuropeyl alcohol<br />
(204) was completely inhibited by 1-aminotriazole as cyt.P-450 inhibitor.<br />
(-)-b-Pinene (1¢) was at first biotransformed by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 to give (+)-transpinocarveol<br />
(2a¢) (274). (+)-trans-Pinocarveol (2a¢) was further transformed by three pathways:<br />
firstly, (+)-trans-pinocarveol (2a¢) was metabolized to (+)-pinocarvone (3¢), (-)-3-isopinanone<br />
(413¢), (+)-2a-hydroxy-3-pinanone (414¢), <strong>and</strong> (+)-2a,5-dihydroxy-3-pinanone (415¢). Secondly,<br />
(+)-trans-pinocarveol (2a¢) was metabolized to (+)-6b-hydroxyfenchol (349ba¢) <strong>and</strong> thirdly<br />
(+)-trans-pinocarveol (2a¢) was metabolized to (-)-6b,7-dihydroxyfenchol (412ba¢) via epoxide<br />
<strong>and</strong> diol as intermediates (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 2005a) (Figure 14.160).
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 685<br />
OH<br />
A.n.<br />
A.n.<br />
1<br />
OH<br />
34 204<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
A.n.<br />
A.n.<br />
1'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
34'<br />
204'<br />
FIGURE 14.159 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)- (1) <strong>and</strong> (-)-b-pinene (1¢) by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2.<br />
(Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 2001. Proc. 45th TEAC, pp. 88–90.)<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
1'<br />
HO<br />
2a'<br />
OH<br />
H+<br />
3'<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
413'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
414'<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
415'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
349ba'<br />
412ba'<br />
FIGURE 14.160 The metabolism <strong>of</strong> (-)-b-pinene (1¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)-trans-pinocarveol (2a¢) by Aspergillus niger<br />
TBUYN-2. (Modified from Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2005a. Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 36th ISEO, p. 32.)<br />
(-)-b-Pinene (1¢) was metabolized by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 with three pathways as shown<br />
in Figure 14.154 to give (-)-a-pinene (4¢), (-)-a-terpineol (34’), <strong>and</strong> (+)-trans-pinocarveol (2a¢).<br />
(-)-a-Pinene (4¢) is further metabolized by three pathways. At first (-)-a-pinene (4¢) was metabolized<br />
via (-)-a-pinene epoxide (38¢), trans-sobrerol (43a¢), (-)-8-hydroxycarvotanacetone (44¢),<br />
(+)-8-hydroxycarvomenthone (45a) to (+)-p-menthane-2,8-diol (50a¢), which was also metabolized<br />
in (-)-carvone (93¢) metabolism. Secondly, (-)-a-pinene (4¢) is metabolized to myretenol (83¢),<br />
which is metabolized by rearrangement reaction to give (-)-oleuropeyl alcohol (204¢). (-)-a-Terpineol<br />
(34¢), which is formed from b-pinene (1¢), was also metabolized to (-)-oleuropeyl alcohol<br />
(204¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)-trans-pinocarveol (2a¢), formed from (-)-b-pinene (1¢), was metabolized to pinocarvone<br />
(3¢), 3-pinanone (413¢), 2a-hydroxy-3-pinanone (414¢), 2a,5-dihydroxy-3-pinanone (415¢), <strong>and</strong><br />
2a,9-dihydroxy-3-pinanone (416¢). Furthermore, (+)-trans-pinocarveol (2a¢) was metabolized by<br />
rearrangemet reaction to give 6b-hydroxyfenchol (349ba¢) <strong>and</strong> 6b,7-dihydroxyfenchol (412ba¢)<br />
(Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 2005a) (Figure 14.161).<br />
(-)-b-Pinene (1¢) was metabolized by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 to give (+)-trans-pinocarveol<br />
(2a¢), which was further metabolized to 6b-hydroxyfenchol (349ba¢) <strong>and</strong> 6b, 7-dihydroxyfenchol
686 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
o<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
83'<br />
OH<br />
38'<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
43a'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
44'<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
45a' 50a' 102a'<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
204'<br />
OH<br />
4'<br />
412ba'<br />
417'<br />
418'<br />
93' 101a'<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
34'<br />
OH<br />
1'<br />
2b'<br />
3'<br />
413'<br />
414'<br />
OH<br />
419'<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
11b'<br />
349ba'<br />
416'<br />
OH<br />
415'<br />
FIGURE 14.161 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-b-pinene (1¢), (-)-a-pinene (4¢), <strong>and</strong> related compounds by<br />
Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2. (Modified from Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2005a. Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 36th<br />
ISEO, p. 32.)<br />
(412ba¢) by rearrangement reaction (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 2005a) (Figure 14.162). 6b-Hydroxyfenchol<br />
(349ba¢) was also obtained from (-)-fenchol (11b¢). (-)-Fenchone was hydroxylated by the<br />
same fungus to give 6b- (13a¢) <strong>and</strong> 6a-hydroxy-(-)-fenchone (13b¢). There is a close relationship<br />
between the metabolism <strong>of</strong> (-)-b-pinene (1¢) <strong>and</strong> those <strong>of</strong> (-)-fenchol (11¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-fenchone (12¢).<br />
(-)-b-Pinene (1¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-a-pinene (4¢) were isomerized to each other. Both are metabovlized<br />
via (-)-a-terpineol (34’) to (-)-oleuropeyl alcohol (204¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-oleuropeic acid (61¢). (-)-Myrtenol<br />
(5¢) formed from (-)-a-pinene (1¢) was further metabolized via cation to (-)-oleuropeyl alcohol<br />
(204¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-oleuropeic acid (61¢). (-)-a-Pinene (4¢) is further metabolized by Aspergillus niger<br />
TBUYN-2 via (-)-a-pinene epoxide (38¢) to trans-sobrerol (43a¢), (-)-8-hydroxycarvotanacetone<br />
(44¢), (+)-8-hydroxycarvomenthone (45a), <strong>and</strong> mosquitocidal (+)-p-menthane-2,8-diol (50a¢)<br />
(Battacharyya et al., 1960; Noma et al., 2001, 2002, 2003) (Figure 14.163).<br />
The major metabolites <strong>of</strong> (-)-b-pinene (1¢) were trans-10-pinanol (myrtanol) (8ba¢) (39%) <strong>and</strong><br />
(-)-1-p-menthene-7,8-diol (oleuropeyl alcohol) (204¢) (30%). In addition, (+)-trans-pinocarveol<br />
(2a¢) (11%) <strong>and</strong> (-)-a-terpineol (34¢) (5%), verbenol (23a <strong>and</strong> 23b) <strong>and</strong> pinocarveol (2a¢) were<br />
oxidation products <strong>of</strong> a- (4) <strong>and</strong> b-pinene (1), respectively, in bark beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis.<br />
(-)-Cis- (23b¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)-trans-verbenols (23a¢) have pheromonal activity in Ips paraconfussus <strong>and</strong><br />
Dendroctonus brevicomis, respectively (Ishida et al., 1981b) (Figure 14.164).<br />
14.4.1.3 (±)-Camphene<br />
Racemate camphene (437 <strong>and</strong> 437¢) is a bicyclic monoterpene hydrocarbon found in Liquidamar<br />
species, Chrysanthemum, Zingiber <strong>of</strong>fi cinale, Rosmarinus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis, <strong>and</strong> among other plants. It
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 687<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
1' 2b'<br />
412ba'<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
11b'<br />
349ba'<br />
13b'<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
13a'<br />
12'<br />
FIGURE 14.162 Relationship <strong>of</strong> the metabolism <strong>of</strong> (-)-b-pinene (1¢), (+)-fenchol (11¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-fenchone<br />
(12¢) by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2. (Modified from Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2005a. Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 36th ISEO, p. 32.)<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
+<br />
OH<br />
OH –<br />
OH<br />
+<br />
+<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
HOH<br />
OH +<br />
OH<br />
H +<br />
OH<br />
CHO<br />
50a'<br />
OH<br />
43a'<br />
OH<br />
4'<br />
5'<br />
OH<br />
204' 205'<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
1' 34'<br />
45a'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
44'<br />
61'<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 14.163 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (-)-b-pinene (1¢) <strong>and</strong> related compounds by Aspergillus niger<br />
TBUYN-2 . (Modified from Bhattacharyya, P.K. et al., 1960. Nature, 187: 689–690; Noma, Y. et al., 2001.<br />
Proc. 45th TEAC, pp. 88–90; Noma, Y. et al., 2002. Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 33rd ISEO, p. 142; Noma, Y.<br />
et al., 2003. Proc. 47th TEAC, pp. 91–93.)<br />
was administered into rabbits. Six metabolites, camphene-2,10-glycols (438a, 438b), which were<br />
the major metabolites, together with 10-hydroxytricyclene (438c), 7-hydroxycamphene (438d),<br />
6-exo-hydroxycamphene (438e), <strong>and</strong> 3-hydroxytricyclene (438f) were obtained (Ishida et al., 1979).<br />
On the basis <strong>of</strong> the production <strong>of</strong> the glycols (438a <strong>and</strong> 438b) in good yield, these alcohols might be<br />
formed through their epoxides as shown in Figure 14.165. The homoallyl camphene oxidation<br />
products (438c–f) apparently were formed through the non-classical cation as the intermediate.
688 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
HO<br />
1'<br />
8ba'<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
23b'<br />
HO<br />
4'<br />
2a'<br />
34'<br />
OH<br />
204'<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
23a'<br />
FIGURE 14.164 Metabolism <strong>of</strong> b-pinene (1) by bark beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis. (Modified from Ishida,<br />
T. et al., 1981b. J. Pharm. Sci., 70: 406–415.)<br />
437 & 437'<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
438c<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
438a<br />
OH<br />
438b<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
438d<br />
438e<br />
438f<br />
FIGURE 14.165 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (±)-camphene (437 <strong>and</strong> 437¢) by rabbits. (Modified from Ishida, T.<br />
et al., 1979. J. Pharm. Sci., 68: 928–930.)<br />
14.4.1.4 3-Carene <strong>and</strong> Carane<br />
1<br />
6<br />
6<br />
1<br />
439 1S,6R<br />
(+)-3-carene<br />
439' 1R,6S<br />
(–)-3-carene<br />
1<br />
6<br />
1<br />
6<br />
6<br />
1<br />
6<br />
1<br />
439b 1S,3S,6R<br />
(–)-cis-carane<br />
439a 1S,3S,6R<br />
(+)-trans-carane<br />
439a' 1R,3R,6S<br />
(–)-trans-carane<br />
439b' 1R,3R,6S<br />
(+)-cis-carane
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 689<br />
6<br />
4<br />
1<br />
OH<br />
440 OH 441<br />
1<br />
6<br />
439<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
6<br />
6<br />
6<br />
6<br />
HO<br />
HOOC<br />
OH<br />
9<br />
COOH<br />
9<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
9<br />
442<br />
9<br />
443 444 445<br />
FIGURE 14.166 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (+)-3-carene (439) by rabbit (Modified from Ishida, T. et al., 1981b.<br />
J. Pharm. Sci., 70: 406–415). 3-(+)-Carene (439) was converted by Aspergillus niger NC 1M612 to give either<br />
hydroxylated compounds <strong>of</strong> 3-carene-2-one or 3-carene-5-one, which was not fully identified. (Modified from<br />
Noma, Y. et al., 2002. Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 33rd ISEO, p. 142) (Figure 14.167).<br />
(+)-3-Carene (439) was biotransformed by rabbits to give m-mentha-4,6-dien-8-ol (440) (71.6%) as<br />
the main metabolite together with its aromatized m-cymen-8-ol (441). The position <strong>of</strong> C-5 in the<br />
substrate is thought to be more easily hydroxylated than C-2 by enzymatic systems in the rabbit<br />
liver. In addition to ring opening compound, 3-carene-9-ol (442), 3-carene-9-carboxylic acid (443),<br />
3-carene-9,10-dicarboxilic acid (445), chamic acid, <strong>and</strong> 3-caren-10-ol-9-carboxylic acid (444) were<br />
formed. The formation <strong>of</strong> such compounds is explained by stereoselective hydroxylation <strong>and</strong><br />
carboxylation <strong>of</strong> gem-dimethyl group (Ishida et al., 1981b) (Figure 14.166). In case <strong>of</strong> (-)-cis-carane<br />
(446), two C-9 <strong>and</strong> C-10 methyl groups were oxidized to give dicarboxylic acid (447) (Ishida et al.,<br />
1981b) (Figure 14.166).<br />
3-(+)-Carene (439) was converted by Aspergillus niger NC 1M612 to give either hydroxylated<br />
compounds <strong>of</strong> 3-carene-2-one or 3-carene-5-one, which was not fully identified (Noma et al., 2002)<br />
(Figure 14.167).<br />
14.4.2 BICYCLIC MONOTERPENE ALDEHYDE<br />
14.4.2.1 Myrtenal <strong>and</strong> Myrtanal<br />
CHO CHO CHO CHO<br />
COH<br />
CHO<br />
6<br />
(+)-<br />
Myrtenal<br />
6 '<br />
(–)-<br />
435b<br />
(+)-cis-<br />
Binihiol<br />
435a<br />
(–)-trans-<br />
Myrtanal<br />
435b'<br />
(–)-cis-<br />
435a'<br />
(+)-trans-<br />
Euglena gracilis Z biotransformed (-)-myrtenal (6¢) to give (-)-myrtenol (5¢) as the major product<br />
<strong>and</strong> (-)-myetenoic acid (7¢) as the minor product. However, further hydrogenation <strong>of</strong> (-)-myrtenol<br />
(5¢) to trans- <strong>and</strong> cis-myrtanol (8a <strong>and</strong> 8b) did not occur even at a concentration less than ca. 50 mg/L.<br />
(S)-Trans <strong>and</strong> (R)-cis-myrtanal (435a¢ <strong>and</strong> 435b¢) were also transformed to trans- <strong>and</strong> cis-myrtanol<br />
(8a¢ <strong>and</strong> 8b¢) as the major products <strong>and</strong> (S)-trans- <strong>and</strong> (R)-cis-myrtanoic acid (436a¢ <strong>and</strong> 436b¢) as<br />
the minor products, respectively (Noma et al., 1991a) (Figure 14.168).
690 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
1<br />
6<br />
O<br />
1<br />
6<br />
OH<br />
or<br />
HO<br />
1<br />
6<br />
O<br />
439<br />
FIGURE 14.167 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (+)-3-Carene (439) by Aspergillus niger NC 1M612. (Modified from<br />
Noma, Y. et al., 2002. Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 33rd ISEO, p. 142.)<br />
OH<br />
CHO<br />
COOH<br />
COOH CHO OH<br />
7'<br />
6'<br />
5'<br />
8b'<br />
OH<br />
435b'<br />
CHO<br />
436b'<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
8a'<br />
435a'<br />
436a'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
25'<br />
34'<br />
204'<br />
FIGURE 14.168 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-myrtenal (6¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)-trans- (435a¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-cis-myrtanal (435b¢)<br />
by microorganisms. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1991a. Phytochem., 30: 1147–1151; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong><br />
Y. Asakawa, 2005b. Proc. 49th TEAC, pp. 78–80; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2006b. Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
37th ISEO, p. 144.)<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2, Aspergillus sojae, <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus usami, (-)-myrtenol<br />
(5¢) was further metabolized to 7-hydroxyverbenone (25¢) as a minor product together with (-)-oleuropeyl<br />
alcohol (204¢) as a major product (279, 280). (-)-Oleuropeyl alcohol (204¢) is also formed<br />
from (-)-a-terpineol (34) by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 (Noma et al., 2001) (Figure 14.168).<br />
Rabbits metabolized myrtenal (6¢) to myrtenic acid (7¢) as the major metabolite <strong>and</strong> myrtanol<br />
(8a¢ or 8b¢) as the minor metabolite (Ishida et al., 1981b) (Figure 14.168).<br />
14.4.3 BICYCLIC MONOTERPENE ALCOHOL<br />
14.4.3.1 Myrtenol<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
5<br />
5'
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 691<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
25'<br />
5'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
204'<br />
34'<br />
FIGURE 14.169 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-myrtenol (5¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-a-terpineol (34¢) by Aspergillus niger<br />
TBUYN-2. (Modified from Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2005b. Proc. 49th TEAC, pp. 78–80.)<br />
(-)-Myrtenol (5¢) was biotransformed mainly to (-)-oleuropeyl alcohol (204¢), which was formed<br />
from (-)-a-terpineol (34¢) as a major product by Aspergillus niger, TBUYN-2. In case <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus<br />
sojae IFO 4389 <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus usami IFO 4338, (-)-myrtenol (5¢) was metabolized to 7-hydroxyverbenone<br />
(25¢) as a minor product together with (-)-oleuropeyl alcohol (204¢) as a major product<br />
(Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 2005b) (Figure 14.169).<br />
14.4.3.2 Myrtanol<br />
Spodoptera litura converted (-)-trans-myrtanol (8a) <strong>and</strong> its enantiomer (8a¢) to give the corresponding<br />
myrtanic acid (436 <strong>and</strong> 436¢) (Miyazawa et al., 1997b) (Figure 14.170).<br />
14.4.3.3 Pinocarveol<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
2a<br />
1S,3R,5S<br />
(–)-trans<br />
2b<br />
1S,3S,5S<br />
(+)-cis<br />
2a'<br />
1R,3S,5R<br />
(+)-trans<br />
2b'<br />
1R,3R,5R<br />
(–)-cis<br />
Pinocarveol<br />
(+)-trans-Pinocarveol (2a¢) was biotransformed by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 to the following<br />
two pathways. Namely, (+)-trans-pinocarveol (2a¢) was metabolized via (+)-pinocarvone (3¢),<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
S. litura<br />
8a<br />
OH<br />
436<br />
COOH<br />
S. litura<br />
8a'<br />
FIGURE 14.170 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-trans-myrtanol (8a) <strong>and</strong> its enantiomer (8a¢) by Spodptera litura.<br />
(Modified from Miyazawa, M. et al., 1997b. Proc. 41st TEAC, pp. 389–390.)<br />
436'
692 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
(-)-3-isopinanone (413¢), <strong>and</strong> (+)-2a-hydroxy-3-pinanone (414¢) to (+)-2a,5-dihydroxy-3-pinanone<br />
(415¢) (pathway 1). Furthermore, (+)-trans-pinocarveol (2a¢) was metabolized to epoxide followed<br />
by rearrangement reaction to give 6b-hydroxyfenchol (349ba¢) <strong>and</strong> 6b,7-dihydroxyfenchol (412ba¢)<br />
(Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 2005a) (Figure 14.171). Spodoptera litura converted (+)-trans-pinocarveol<br />
(2a¢) to (+)-pinocarvone (3¢) as a major product (Miyazawa et al., 1995c) (Figure 14.171).<br />
14.4.3.4 Pinane-2,3-diol<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
418aa<br />
418ab<br />
418ab'<br />
418aa'<br />
()-Pinane-2,3-diol<br />
1S,2S,3S,5S<br />
(+)-Pinane-2,3-diol<br />
1S,2S,3R,5S<br />
(–)-Pinane-2,3-diol<br />
1R,2R,3S,5R<br />
()-Pinane-2,3-diol<br />
1R,2R,3R,5R<br />
This results led us to study the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-pinane-2,3-diol (418ab¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)-pinane-2,3-<br />
diol (418ab) by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2. (-)-Pinane-2,3-diol (418ab¢) was easily biotransformed<br />
to give (-)-pinane-2,3,5-triol (419ab¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)-2,5-dihydroxy-3-pinanone (415a¢) as the<br />
major products <strong>and</strong> (+)-2-hydroxy-3-pinanone (414a¢) as the minor product.<br />
On the other h<strong>and</strong>, (+)-pinane-2,3-diol (418ab) was also biotransformed easily to give (+)-pinane-<br />
2,3,5-triol (419ab) <strong>and</strong> (-)-2,5-dihydroxy-3-pinanone (415a) as the major products <strong>and</strong><br />
(-)-2-hydroxy-3-pinanone (414a) as the minor product (Noma et al., 2003) (Figure 14.172). Glomerella<br />
cingulata transformed (-)-pinane-2,3-diol (418ab¢) to a small amount <strong>of</strong> (+)-2a-hydroxy-3-pinanone<br />
(414ab¢, 5%) (Kamino <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 2005), whereas (+)-pinane-2,3-diol (418ab) was transformed<br />
to a small amount <strong>of</strong> (-)-2a-hydroxy-3-pinanone (414ab, 10%) <strong>and</strong> (-)-3-acetoxy-2a-pinanol<br />
(433ab-Ac, 30%) (Kamino et al., 2004) (Figure 14.172).<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
A.n.<br />
S. litula.<br />
A.n. A.n. A. n.<br />
2a'<br />
3'<br />
412'<br />
413'<br />
OH<br />
414'<br />
H+<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
A.n.<br />
A.n.<br />
349ba'<br />
412ba'<br />
FIGURE 14.171 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-trans-pinocarveol (2a¢) by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 <strong>and</strong><br />
Spodptera litura. (Modified from Miyazawa, M. et al., 1995c. Proc. 39th TEAC, pp. 360–361; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong><br />
Y. Asakawa, 2005a. Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 36th ISEO, p. 32.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 693<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OAc<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
A.n.<br />
OH<br />
G.c.<br />
A.n.<br />
419ab<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
418ab'-Ac<br />
418ab<br />
G.c.<br />
O<br />
A.n.<br />
O<br />
414a<br />
OH<br />
415a<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
A.n. A.n. A.n.<br />
G.c.<br />
OH<br />
419ab'<br />
418ab'<br />
414a'<br />
OH<br />
415a'<br />
FIGURE 14.172 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-pinane-2,3-diol (418ab¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-pinane-2,3-diol (418ab¢) by<br />
Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2(276)] <strong>and</strong> Glomerella cingulata. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 2003. Proc.<br />
47th TEAC, pp. 91–93; Kamino, F. et al., 2004. Proc. 48th TEAC, pp. 383–384; Kamino, F. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa,<br />
2005. Proc. 49th TEAC, pp. 395–396.)<br />
14.4.3.5 Isopinocampheol (3-Pinanol)<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
420 ba<br />
(–)-isopino<br />
1R,2R,3R,5S<br />
420bb<br />
(+)-neoiso<br />
1R,2R,3S,5S<br />
420aa<br />
(–)-neo<br />
1R,2S,3R,5S<br />
420ab<br />
(+)-pinocampherol<br />
1R,2S,3S,5S<br />
HO HO HO HO<br />
420ba' (+)-<br />
1S,2S,3S,5R<br />
420bb' (–)-<br />
1S,2S,3R,5R<br />
420aa' (+)-neo<br />
1S,2R,3S,5R<br />
420ab'<br />
1S,2R,3R,5R<br />
14.4.3.5.1 Chemical Structure <strong>of</strong> (-)-Isopinocampheol (420ba) <strong>and</strong> (+)-Isopinocampheol<br />
(420ba¢)<br />
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> isopinocampheol (3-pinanol) with 100 bacterial <strong>and</strong> fungal strains yielded<br />
1-, 2-, 4-, 5-, 7-, 8-, <strong>and</strong> 9-hydroxyisopinocampheol besides three rearranged monoterpenes, one
694 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> them bearing the novel isocarene skeleton. A pronounced enantioselectivity between (-)-<br />
(420ba) <strong>and</strong> (+)-isopinocampheol (420ba¢) was observed. The phylogenetic position <strong>of</strong> the individual<br />
strains could be seen in their ability to form the products from (+)-isopinocampheol<br />
(420ba¢). The formation <strong>of</strong> 1,3-dihydroxypinane (421ba¢) is a domain <strong>of</strong> bacteria, while 3,5-<br />
(415ba¢) or 3,6-dihydroxypinane (428baa¢) was mainly formed by fungi, especially those <strong>of</strong> the<br />
phylum Zygomycotina. The activity <strong>of</strong> Basidiomycotina towards oxidation <strong>of</strong> isopinocampheol<br />
was rather low. Such informations can be used in a more effective selection <strong>of</strong> strains for screening<br />
(Wolf-Rainer, 1994) (Figure 14.173).<br />
(+)-Isopinocampheol (420ba¢) was metabolized to 4b-hydroxy-(+)-isopino-campheol (424¢),<br />
2b-hydroxy-(+)-isopinocampherol acetate (425ba¢-Ac), <strong>and</strong> 2a-methyl,3-(2-methyl-2-hydroxypropyl)-cyclopenta-1b-ol<br />
(432¢) (Wolf-Rainer, 1994) (Figure 14.174).<br />
RO<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
427ba',R:H<br />
427ba'-Ac,R:Ac<br />
426ba'<br />
418ab'<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
429'<br />
421ba'<br />
420ba'<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
RO<br />
O<br />
430'<br />
OH<br />
428baa'<br />
OH<br />
415ba',R:H<br />
415ba'-Ac,R:Ac<br />
OH<br />
431b'<br />
FIGURE 14.173 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (+)-isopinocampheol (420ba¢) by microorganisms. (Modified from<br />
Wolf-Rainer, A., 1994. Naturforsch., 49c: 553–560.)<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
AcO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
432'<br />
420ba'<br />
425ba'-Ac<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
424'<br />
FIGURE 14.174 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (+)-isopinocampheol (420ba¢) by microorganisms. (Modified from<br />
Wolf-Rainer, A., 1994. Naturforsch., 49c: 553–560.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 695<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
S. litura<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
S. litura<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
423ba<br />
OH<br />
S. litura<br />
420ba<br />
420ba'<br />
423ba'<br />
418ab<br />
FIGURE 14.175 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)- (420ba) <strong>and</strong> (+)-isopinocampheol (420ba¢) by Spodptera litura.<br />
(Modified from Miyazawa, M. et al., 1997c. Phytochemistry, 45: 945–950.)<br />
(-)-Isopinocampheol (420ba) was converted by Spodoptera litura to give (1R,2S,3R,5S)-pinane-<br />
2,3-diol (418ba) <strong>and</strong> (-)-pinane-3,9-diol (423ba), whereas (+)-isopinocampheol (420ba¢) was converted<br />
to (+)-pinane-3,9-diol (423ba¢) (Miyazawa et al., 1997c) (Figure 14.175).<br />
(-)-Isopinocampheol (420ba) was biotransformed by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 to give<br />
(+)-(1S,2S,3S,5R)-pinane-3,5-diol (422ba, 6.6%), (-)-(1R,2R,3R,5S)-pinane-1,3-diol (421ba, 11.8%),<br />
<strong>and</strong> pinane-2,3-diol (418ba, 6.6%), whereas (+)-isopinocampheol (420ba¢) was biotransformed by<br />
Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 to give (+)-(1S,2S,3S,5R)-pinane-3,5-diol (422ba¢, 6.3%) <strong>and</strong><br />
(-)-(1R,2R,3R,5S)-pinane-1,3,-diol (421ba¢, 8.6%) (Noma et al., 2009) (Figure 14.176). On the other<br />
h<strong>and</strong>, Glomerella cingulata converted (-)- (420ba) <strong>and</strong> (+)-isopinocampheol (420ba¢) mainly to<br />
(1R,2R,3S,4S,5R)-3,4-pinanediol (484ba) <strong>and</strong> (1S,2S,3S,5R,6R)-3,6-pinanediol (485ba¢), respectively,<br />
together with (418ba), (422ba), (422ba¢), <strong>and</strong> (486ba¢) as minor products (Miyazawa et al., 1997c)<br />
(Figure 14.176). Some similarities exist between the main metabolites with Glomerella cingulata <strong>and</strong><br />
Rhizoctonia solani (Miyazawa et al., 1997c) (Figure 14.176).<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
422ba<br />
G.c.<br />
A.n.<br />
418ba<br />
A.n.<br />
G.c.<br />
485ba'<br />
G.c.<br />
OH<br />
A.n.<br />
G.c.<br />
OH<br />
422ba'<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
A.n.<br />
OH<br />
HO HO OH<br />
A.n.<br />
421ba<br />
G.c.<br />
420ba<br />
420ba'<br />
G.c.<br />
421ba'<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
484ba<br />
OH<br />
486ba'<br />
FIGURE 14.176 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)- (420ba) <strong>and</strong> (+)-isopinocampheol (420ba¢) by Aspergillus niger<br />
TBUYN-2 <strong>and</strong> Glomerella cingulata. (Modified from Miyazawa, M. et al., 1997c. Phytochemistry, 45: 945–<br />
950; Noma, Y. et al., 2009. unpublished data.)<br />
OH
E. gracilis<br />
696 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
14.4.3.6 Borneol <strong>and</strong> Isoborneol<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
36a<br />
(1R,2S)-(+)-<br />
borneol<br />
(36a)<br />
36b'<br />
(1R,2R)-(–)-<br />
isoborneol<br />
(36b')<br />
36b'<br />
(1S,2R)-(–)-<br />
borneol<br />
(36a')<br />
36b<br />
(1S,2S)-(+)-<br />
isoborneol<br />
(36b)<br />
(-)-Borneol (36a¢) was biotransformed by Pseudomonas pseudomonallei strain H to give (-)-camphor<br />
(37¢), 6-hydroxycamphor (228¢), <strong>and</strong> 2,6-diketocamphor (229¢) (Hayashi et al., 1969) (Figure 14.177).<br />
Euglena gracilis Z. showed enantio- <strong>and</strong> diastereoselectivity in the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-<br />
(36a), (-)- (36a¢), <strong>and</strong> (±)-racemic borneols (equal mixture <strong>of</strong> 36a <strong>and</strong> 36a¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)- (36b),<br />
(-)- (36b¢), <strong>and</strong> (±)-isoborneols (equal mixture <strong>of</strong> 36b <strong>and</strong> 36b¢). The enantio- <strong>and</strong> diastereoselective<br />
dehydrogenation for (-)-borneol (36a¢) was carried out to give (-)-camphor (37¢) at ca. 50%<br />
yield (Noma et al., 1992d; Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 1998). The conversion ratio was always ca. 50%<br />
even at different kinds <strong>of</strong> concentration <strong>of</strong> (-)-borneol (36a¢). When (-)-camphor (37¢) was used as<br />
a substrate, it was also converted to (-)-borneol (36a¢) in 22% yield for 14 days. Furthermore,<br />
(+)-camphor (37) was also reduced to (+)-borneol (36a) in 4% <strong>and</strong> 18% yield for 7 <strong>and</strong> 14 days,<br />
respectively (Noma et al., 1992d, Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 1998) (Figure 14.178).<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
37'<br />
P. pseudomonari<br />
O<br />
O<br />
36b'<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
229'<br />
228'<br />
FIGURE 14.177 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-borneol (36a¢) by Pseudomonas pseudomonallei strain. (Modified<br />
from Hayashi, T. et al., 1969. J. Agric. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 43: 583–587.)<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
36b'<br />
O<br />
O<br />
E. gracilis<br />
36b<br />
HO<br />
E. gracilis<br />
37 (+)<br />
37'<br />
(–)<br />
E. gracilis<br />
OH<br />
36a<br />
36a'<br />
FIGURE 14.178 Enantio- <strong>and</strong> diastereoselectivity in the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)- (36a) <strong>and</strong> (-)- borneols<br />
(36a¢) by Euglena gracilis Z. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 1992d. Proc. 36th TEAC, pp. 199–201; Noma, Y.<br />
<strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1998. Biotechnology in Agriculture <strong>and</strong> Forestry, Vol. 41. Medicinal <strong>and</strong> Aromatic Plants X,<br />
Y.P.S. Bajaj, ed., pp. 194–237. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 697<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
S. litura S. litura<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
36a<br />
370<br />
36a'<br />
370'<br />
FIGURE 14.179 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)- (36a) <strong>and</strong> (-)-borneols (36a¢) by Spodptera litura. (Modified<br />
from Miyamoto, Y. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2001. Proc. 45th TEAC, pp. 377–378.)<br />
(+)- (36a) <strong>and</strong> (-)-Borneols (36a¢) were biotransformed by Spodoptera litura to (+)- (370a) <strong>and</strong><br />
(-)-bornane-2,8-diols (370a¢), respectively (Miyamoto <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 2001) (Figure 14.179).<br />
14.4.3.7 Fenchol <strong>and</strong> Fenchyl Acetate<br />
10<br />
HO 1<br />
2<br />
6<br />
8 3<br />
7<br />
5<br />
9 4<br />
(1R,2R,4S)<br />
(+)-endo<br />
(+)-α-fenchol<br />
11a<br />
HO<br />
(1R,2S,4S)<br />
(+)-exo<br />
(+)-β-fenchol<br />
11b<br />
OH<br />
(1S,2S,4R)<br />
(–)-endo<br />
(–)-α-fenchol<br />
11a'<br />
OH<br />
(1S,2R,4R)<br />
(–)-exo<br />
(–)-β-fenchol<br />
11b'<br />
(1R,2R,4S)-(+)-Fenchol (11a) was converted by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus<br />
cellulosae IFO 4040 to give (-)-fenchone (12), (+)-6b-hydroxyfenchol (349ab), (+)-5b-hydroxyfenchol<br />
(350ab) <strong>and</strong> 5a-hydroxyfenchol (350aa) (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 2005a) (Figure 14.180).<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
467a<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
465a<br />
HO<br />
12<br />
S. litura<br />
349ab<br />
A.n. 10<br />
A.n.<br />
HO<br />
1<br />
S. litura<br />
HO<br />
S. litura<br />
6<br />
2<br />
A.n.<br />
8<br />
7<br />
3<br />
5<br />
9 4<br />
11a<br />
A.n.<br />
350ab<br />
S. litura<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
466a<br />
350aa<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 14.180 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-fenchol (11a) by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2, Aspergillus<br />
cellulosae IFO 4040, <strong>and</strong> the larvae <strong>of</strong> common cutworm, Spodptera litura. (Modified from Miyazawa, M.<br />
<strong>and</strong> Y. Miyamoto, 2004. Tetrahadron, 60: 3091–3096; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2005a. Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 36th ISEO, p. 32.)
698 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
The larvae <strong>of</strong> common cutworm, Spodoptera litura, converted (+)-fenchol (11a) to (+)-10-hydroxyfenchol<br />
(467a), (+)-8-hydroxyfenchol (465a), (+)-6b-hydroxyfenchol (349ab), <strong>and</strong> (-)-9-hydroxyfenchol<br />
(466a) (Miyazawa <strong>and</strong> Miyamoto, 2004) (Figure 14.180).<br />
(+)-trans-Pinocarveol (2), which was formed from (-)-b-pinene (1), was metabolized by Aspergillus<br />
niger TBUYN-2 to 6b-hydroxy- (+)-fenchol (349ab) <strong>and</strong> 6b,7-dihydroxy-(+)-fenchol (412ba¢).<br />
(-)-Fenchone (12) was also metabolized to 6a-hydroxy- (13b) <strong>and</strong> 6b-hydroxy- (-)-fenchone (13a).<br />
(+)-Fenchol (11) was metabolized to 6b-hydroxy-(+)-fenchol (349ab) by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2.<br />
Relationship <strong>of</strong> the metabolisms <strong>of</strong> (+)-trans-pinocarveol (2), (-)-fenchone (12), <strong>and</strong> (+)-fenchol (11)<br />
by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 is shown in Figure 14.181 (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa 2005a).<br />
(+)-a-Fencyl acetate (11a-Ac) was metabolized by Glomerella cingulata to give (+)-5-b-hydroxya-fencyl<br />
acetate (350a-Ac, 50%) as the major metabolite <strong>and</strong> (+)-fenchol (11a, 20%) as the minor<br />
metabolite (Miyazato <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa 1999). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, (-)-a-fencyl acetate (11a¢-Ac) was<br />
metabolized to (-)-5-b-hydroxy-a-fencyl acetate (350a¢-Ac, 70%) <strong>and</strong> (-)-fenchol (11a¢, 10%) as<br />
the minor metabolite by Glomerella cingulata (Miyazato <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 1999) (Figure 14.182).<br />
HO<br />
1 2a<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
11a<br />
349ab<br />
412ba'<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
13a<br />
12<br />
13b<br />
FIGURE 14.181 Metabolism <strong>of</strong> (+)-trans-pinocarveol (2), (-)-fenchone (12), <strong>and</strong> (+)-fenchol (11) by Aspergillus<br />
niger TBUYN-2. (Modified from Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2005a. Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 36th ISEO, p. 32.)<br />
HO<br />
11a<br />
20%<br />
AcO<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
1<br />
2<br />
6<br />
3<br />
7<br />
5<br />
4<br />
11a-Ac<br />
AcO<br />
OH<br />
350a-Ac<br />
50%<br />
11a'<br />
10%<br />
OH<br />
11a'-Ac<br />
FIGURE 14.182 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)- (11a-Ac) <strong>and</strong> (-)-a-fencyl acetate (11a¢-Ac) by Glomerella<br />
cingulata. (Modified from Miyazato, Y. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 1999. Proc. 43rd TEAC, pp. 213–214.)<br />
OAc<br />
HO<br />
5<br />
2<br />
350a'-Ac<br />
70%<br />
OAc
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 699<br />
14.4.3.8 Verbenol<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
23a'<br />
(–)-transverbenol<br />
23b'<br />
(–+)-cisverbenol<br />
23a<br />
(+)-transverbenol<br />
23b<br />
(–)-cisverbenol<br />
(-)-trans-Verbenol (23a¢) was biotransformed by Spodoptera litura to give 10-hydroxyverbenol<br />
(451a¢). Furthermore, (-)-verbenone (24¢) was also biotransformed in the same manner to give<br />
10-hydroxyverbenone (25¢) (Yamanaka <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 1999) (Figure 14.183).<br />
14.4.3.9 Nopol <strong>and</strong> Nopol Benzyl Ether<br />
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-nopol (452¢) was carried out at 30∞C for 7 days at the concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
100 mg/200 mL medium by Aspergillusniger TBUYN-2, Aspergillus sojae IFO 4389, <strong>and</strong><br />
Aspergillus usami IFO 4338. (-)-Nopol (452¢) was incubated with Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 to<br />
give 7-hydroxymethyl-1-p-menthen-8-ol (453¢). In cases <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus sojae IFO 4389 <strong>and</strong><br />
Aspergillus usami IFO 4338, (-)-nopol (452¢) was metabolized to 3-oxonopol (454¢) as a minor<br />
product together with 7-hydroxymethyl-1-p-menthen-8-ol (453¢) as a major product (Noma <strong>and</strong><br />
Asakawa, 2005b; 2006c) (Figure 14.184).<br />
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-nopol benzyl ether (455¢) was carried out at 30∞C for 8–13 days at the<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> 277 mg/200 mL medium by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2, Aspergillus sojae IFO<br />
4389, <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus usami IFO 4338. (-)-Nopol benzyl ether (455¢) was biotransformed by<br />
Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 to give 4-oxonopl-2¢, 4¢-dihydroxy benzyl ether (456¢), <strong>and</strong> (-)-oxonopol<br />
(454¢). 7-Hydroxymethyl-1-p-menthen-8-ol benzyl ether (457¢) was not formed at all (Figure 14.185).<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
S. litura<br />
S. litura<br />
HO<br />
23a'<br />
(–)-transverbenol<br />
HO<br />
451a'<br />
24'<br />
(–)-verbenone<br />
FIGURE 14.183 Metabolism <strong>of</strong> (-)-trans-verbenol (23a¢) <strong>and</strong> (-)-verbenone (24¢) by Spodptera litura.<br />
(Modified from Yamanaka, T. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 1999. Proc. 43rd TEAC, pp. 391–392.)<br />
O<br />
O<br />
25'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
454'<br />
452'<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 14.184 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-nopol (452¢) by Aspergillus niger, TBUYN-2, Aspergillus sojae<br />
IFO 4389 <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus usami IFO 4338. (Modified from Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2005b. Proc. 49th<br />
TEAC, pp. 78–80; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2006c. Proc. 50th TEAC, pp. 434–436.)<br />
453'
700 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
+<br />
O<br />
455'<br />
456'<br />
454'<br />
FIGURE 14.185 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-Nopol benzyl ether (455¢) by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2.<br />
(Modified from Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2006b. Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 37th ISEO, p. 144; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong><br />
Y. Asakawa, 2006c. Proc. 50th TEAC, pp. 434–436.)<br />
2'<br />
O<br />
O<br />
4'<br />
4<br />
455'<br />
OH<br />
457<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
456'<br />
O<br />
454'<br />
FIGURE 14.186 Proposed metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (-)-nopol benzyl ether (455¢) by microorganisms.<br />
(Modified from Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2006b. Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 37th ISEO, p. 144; Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong><br />
Y. Asakawa, 2006c. Proc. 50th TEAC, pp. 434–436.)<br />
4-Oxonopol-2’,4’-dihydroxybenzyl ether (456¢) shows strong antioxidative activity (IC 50 30.23 mM).<br />
Antioxidative activity <strong>of</strong> 4-oxonopol-2’,4’-dihydroxybenzyl ether (456¢) is the same as that <strong>of</strong> butyl<br />
hydroxyl anisol (BHA) (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 2006b,c).<br />
Citrus pathogenic fungi, Aspergillus niger Tiegh (CBAYN) also transformed (-)-nopol (452¢) to<br />
(-)-oxonopol (454¢) <strong>and</strong> 4-oxonopol-2’,4’-dihydroxybenzyl ether (456¢) (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa,<br />
2006b,c) (Figure 14.186).<br />
14.4.4 BICYCLIC MONOTERPENE KETONES<br />
14.4.4.1 α-, β-Unsaturated Ketone<br />
14.4.4.1.1 Verbenone<br />
O<br />
24<br />
(+)-verbenone<br />
O<br />
24'<br />
(–)-verbenone
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 701<br />
O<br />
N. tabacum<br />
verbenone<br />
reductase O<br />
24'<br />
458b'<br />
FIGURE 14.187 Hydrogenation <strong>of</strong> (-)-verbenone (24¢) to (-)-isoverbanone (458b¢) by verbenone reductase <strong>of</strong><br />
Nicotiana tabacum. (Modified from Suga, T. <strong>and</strong> T. Hirata, 1990. Phytochemistry, 29: 2393–2406; Shimoda, K.<br />
et al., 1996. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 355–358; Shimoda, K. et al., 1998. Phytochem., 49: 49–53; Shimoda, K.<br />
et al., 2002. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 75: 813–816; Hirata, T. et al., 2000. Chem. Lett., 29: 850–851.)<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
3' 413b' 414b'<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
415b'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 14.188 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-pinocarvone (3¢) by Aspergillusniger TBUYN-2. (Modified from<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2005a. Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 36th ISEO, p. 32.)<br />
(-)-Verbenone (24¢) was hydrogenated by reductase <strong>of</strong> Nicotiana tabacum to give (-)-isoverbanone<br />
(458b¢) (Suga <strong>and</strong> Hirata, 1990; Shimoda et al., 1996, 1998, 2002; Hirata et al., 2000) (Figure 14.187).<br />
14.4.4.1.2 Pinocarvone<br />
416b'<br />
O<br />
O<br />
3<br />
(–)-Pinocarvone<br />
3'<br />
(+)-Pinocarvone<br />
Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 transformed (+)-pinocarvone (3¢) to give (-)-isopinocamphone (413b¢),<br />
2a-hydroxy-3-pinanone (414b¢), 2a, 5-dihydroxy-3-pinanone (415b¢) together with small amounts<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2a, 10-dihydroxy-3-pinanone (416b¢) (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 2005a) (Figure 14.188).<br />
14.4.4.2 Saturated Ketone<br />
14.4.4.2.1 Camphor<br />
O<br />
O<br />
37<br />
(1R)-(+)-camphor<br />
(37)<br />
37'<br />
(1S)-(–)-camphor<br />
(37')
702 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
(+)- (37) <strong>and</strong> (-)-Camphor (37¢) are found widely in nature, <strong>of</strong> which (+)-camphor (37) is more<br />
abundant. It is the main component <strong>of</strong> oils obtained from the camphor tree Cinnamomum camphora<br />
(Bauer et al., 1990). The hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> (+)-camphor (37) by Pseudomonas putida C 1 was described<br />
(Abraham et al., 1988). The substrate was hydroxylated exclusively in its 5-exo- (235b) <strong>and</strong><br />
6-exo- (228b) positions.<br />
Although only limited success was achieved in underst<strong>and</strong>ing the catabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (+)-camphor<br />
(37), key roles for methylene group hydroxylation <strong>and</strong> biological Baeyer–Villiger monooxygenases<br />
in ring cleavage strategies were established (Trudgill, 1990). A degradation pathway <strong>of</strong><br />
(+)-camphor (37) by Pseudomonas putida ATCC 17453 <strong>and</strong> Mycobacaterium rhodochorus T 1 was<br />
proposed (Trudgill, 1990).<br />
The metabolic pathway <strong>of</strong> (+)-camphor (37) by microorganisms is shown in Figure 14.189.<br />
(+)-Camphor (37) is metabolized to 3-hydroxy- (243), 5-hydroxy- (235), 6-hydroxy- (228), <strong>and</strong><br />
9- hydroxycamphor (225) <strong>and</strong> 1,2- campholide (237). 6-Hydroxycamphor (228) is degradatively<br />
metabolized to 6-oxocamphor (229) <strong>and</strong> 4-carboxymethyl-2,3,3-trimethylcyclopentanone (230),<br />
4-carboxymethyl-3,5,5-trimethyltetrahydro-2-pyrone (231), isohydroxy-camphoric acid (232),<br />
isoketocamphoric acid (233), <strong>and</strong> 3,4,4-trimethyl-5-oxo-trans-2-hexenoic acid (234), whereas 1,2-<br />
campholide (237) is also degradatively metabolized to 6-hydroxy-1,2-campholide (238), 6-oxo-1,<br />
2-campholide (239), <strong>and</strong> 5-carboxymethyl-3,4,4-trimethyl-2-cyclopentenone (240), 6-carboxymethyl-<br />
4,5,5-trimethyl-5,6-dihydro-2-pyrone (241) <strong>and</strong> 5-carboxymethyl-3,4,4-trimethyl-2-heptene-1,7-dioic<br />
acid (242). 5-Hydroxycamphor (235) is metabolized to 6-hydroxy-1,2-campholide (238), 5-oxocamphor<br />
(236), <strong>and</strong> 6-oxo-1,2-campholide (239). 3-Hydroxycamphor (243) is also metabolized to<br />
camphorquinone (244) <strong>and</strong> 2-hydroxyepicamphor (245) (Bradshaw et al., 1959; Conrad et al., 1961,<br />
1965a, 1965b; Gunsalus et al., 1965; Chapman et al., 1966; Hartline <strong>and</strong> Gunsalus, 1971; Oritani <strong>and</strong><br />
Yamashita, 1974) (Figure 14.189).<br />
Human CYP 2A6 converted (+)-camphor (37) <strong>and</strong> (-)-camphor (37¢) to 6-endo-hydroxycamphor<br />
(228a) <strong>and</strong> 5-exo-hydroxycamphor (235b), while rat CYP 2B1 did 5-endo- (235a), 5-exo- (235b)<br />
<strong>and</strong> 6-endo-hydroxycamphor (228a) <strong>and</strong> 8-hydroxycamphor (225) (Gyoubu <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa 2006)<br />
(Figure 14.190).<br />
(+)-Camphor (37) was glycosylated by Eucalyptus perriniana suspension cells to (+)-camphor<br />
monoglycoside (3 new, 11.7%) (Hamada et al., 2002) (Figure 14.191).<br />
14.4.4.2.2 Fenchone<br />
O<br />
O<br />
12 (+)-<br />
12' (–)-<br />
(+)-Fenchone (12) was incubated with Corynebacterium sp. (Chapman et al., 1965) <strong>and</strong> Absidia<br />
orchidis (Pfrunder <strong>and</strong> Tamm, 1969a) give 6b-hydroxy- (13a) <strong>and</strong> 5b-hydroxyfenchones (14a)<br />
(Figure 14.191). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, Aspergillus niger biotransformed (+)-fenchone (12) to (+)-6a-<br />
(13b) <strong>and</strong> (+)-5a-hydroxyfenchones (14b) (Miyazawa et al., 1990a, 1990b) <strong>and</strong> 5-ox<strong>of</strong>enchone (15),<br />
9-formylfenchone (17b), <strong>and</strong> 9-carboxyfenchone (18b) (Miyazawa et al., 1990a, 1990b)<br />
(Figure 14.192).<br />
Furthermore, Aspergillus niger biotransformed (-)-fenchone (12¢) to 5a-hydroxy- (14b¢) <strong>and</strong><br />
6a-hydroxyfenchones (13b¢) (Yamamoto et al., 1984) (Figure 14.193).<br />
(+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-Fenchone (12 <strong>and</strong> 12¢) were converted to 6b-hydroxy- (13a, 13a¢), 6a-hydroxyfenchone<br />
(13b, 13b¢), <strong>and</strong> 10 hydroxyfenchone (4, 4¢) by P-450. Of the 11 recombinant human P450<br />
enzymes tested, CYP2A6, CYP2B6 catalyzed oxidation <strong>of</strong> (+)- (12) <strong>and</strong> (-)-fenchone (12¢) (Gyoubu<br />
<strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 2005) (Figure 14.194).
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 703<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
AcO<br />
225a<br />
36a&b<br />
226a&b<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
225b<br />
37<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
243 244 245<br />
O<br />
O<br />
o<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
235<br />
OH<br />
237<br />
228<br />
391<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
o<br />
O<br />
O<br />
236<br />
O<br />
238<br />
OH<br />
229<br />
O<br />
o<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
239<br />
O<br />
230<br />
COOH<br />
231<br />
COOH<br />
HO<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
240<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
241<br />
O<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
COOH<br />
232<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
242<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
COOH<br />
233<br />
234<br />
H<br />
COOH<br />
FIGURE 14.189 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (+)-camphor (37) by Pseudomonas putida <strong>and</strong> Corynebacterium diphtheroides.<br />
(Modified from Bradshaw, W.H. et al., 1959. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 81: 5507; Conrad, H.E. et al., 1961.<br />
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 6: 293–297; Conrad, H.E. et al., 1965a. J. Biol. Chem., 240: 495–503; Conrad,<br />
H.E. et al., 1965b. J. Biol. Chem., 240: 4029–4037; Gunsalus, I.C. et al., 1965. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.,<br />
18: 924–931; Chapman, P.J. et al., 1966. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 88: 618–619; Hartline, R.A. <strong>and</strong> I.C. Gunsalus, 1971.<br />
J. Bacteriol., 106: 468–478; Oritani, T. <strong>and</strong> K. Yamashita, 1974. Agric. Biol. Chem., 38: 1961–1964.)
704 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O O O O OH O<br />
rat CYP2B1<br />
+ + +<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
37 235a 235b 228b 225<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
human CYP2A6<br />
OH<br />
37 228b 37'<br />
O<br />
human CYP2A6<br />
FIGURE 14.190 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-camphor (37) by rat P450 enzyme (above) <strong>and</strong> (+)- (37) <strong>and</strong><br />
(-)-camphor (37¢) by human P450 enzymes.<br />
HO<br />
235a'<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
E. perriniana<br />
OH<br />
E. perriniana<br />
O<br />
O-Glc<br />
+<br />
Another camphor glycoside<br />
37<br />
228 3new<br />
FIGURE 14.191 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-camphor (37) by Eucalyptus perriniana suspension cell.<br />
HO<br />
6<br />
13b<br />
O<br />
A.n<br />
HO<br />
A.n<br />
5<br />
14b<br />
O<br />
A.n<br />
O<br />
5<br />
15<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
6<br />
13a<br />
O<br />
A. orchidis<br />
Corynebacterium sp.<br />
12<br />
O<br />
Corynebacterium sp.<br />
A. orchidis<br />
HO<br />
5<br />
14a<br />
O<br />
A.n<br />
O<br />
O<br />
CHO<br />
A.n<br />
COOH<br />
17b<br />
FIGURE 14.192 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (+)-fenchone (12) by Corynebacterium sp., A. orchidis <strong>and</strong><br />
Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2. (Modified from Chapman, P.J. et al., 1965. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.,<br />
20: 104–108; Pfrunder, B. <strong>and</strong> Ch. Tamm, 1969a. Helv. Chim. Acta., 52: 1643–1654; Miyazawa, M. et al.,<br />
1990a. Chem. Express, 5: 237–240; Miyazawa, M. et al., 1990b. Chem. Express, 5: 407–410.)<br />
18b
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 705<br />
O<br />
14b'<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
8<br />
9<br />
2<br />
3<br />
10<br />
1<br />
4<br />
12'<br />
FIGURE 14.193 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (-)-fenchone (12¢) by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2. (Modified from<br />
Yamamoto, K. et al., 1984. Proc. 28th TEAC, pp. 168–170.)<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
O<br />
13b'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
P450<br />
HO<br />
6<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
6<br />
O<br />
+ +<br />
O<br />
12<br />
13a 13b 4<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
P450<br />
O<br />
OH O<br />
OH<br />
+ +<br />
12'<br />
13a' 13b' 4'<br />
FIGURE 14.194 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-fenchone (12) <strong>and</strong> (-)-fenchone (12¢) by P-450 enzymes. (Modified<br />
from Gyoubu, K. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2005. Proc. 49th TEAC, pp. 420–422.)<br />
14.4.4.2.3 3-Pinanone (Pinocamphone <strong>and</strong> Isopinocamphone)<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
413a 1R2S5S<br />
(+)-pinocamphone<br />
413b 1R,2R,5S<br />
(+)-isopinocamphone<br />
413a' 1S2R5R<br />
(–)-pinocamphone<br />
413b' 1S2S5R<br />
(–)-isopinocamphone<br />
(+)- (413) <strong>and</strong> (-)-Isopinocamphone (413¢) were biotransformed by Aspergillus niger to give (-)-<br />
(414) <strong>and</strong> (+)-2-hydroxy-3-pinanone (414¢) as the main products, respectively, which inhibit strongly<br />
germination <strong>of</strong> lettuce seeds, <strong>and</strong> (-)- (415) <strong>and</strong> (+)-2,5-dihydroxy-3-pinanone (415¢) as the minor<br />
components, respectively (Noma et al., 2003, 2004) (Figure 14.195).<br />
14.4.4.2.4 2-Hydroxy-3-Pinanone<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
(1S,2R,5S)<br />
(–)-2-OH-3-<br />
pinanone<br />
414a<br />
(1S,2R,5S)<br />
(+)-2-OH-3-<br />
pinanone<br />
414b<br />
(1R,2R,5R)<br />
(+)-2-OH-3-<br />
pinanone<br />
414a'<br />
(1R,2S,5R)<br />
(+)-2-OH-3<br />
-pinanone<br />
414b'
706 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
413 414<br />
OH<br />
415<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
413'<br />
414'<br />
FIGURE 14.195 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-isopinocamphone (413b) <strong>and</strong> (-)-isopinocamphone (413b¢) by<br />
Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 2003. Proc. 47th TEAC, pp. 91–93; Noma, Y.<br />
et al., 2004. Proc. 48th TEAC, pp. 390–392.)<br />
(-)-2a-Hydroxy-3-pinanone (414) was incubated with Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 to give (-)-2a,<br />
5-dihydroxy-3-pinanone (415) predominantly, whereas the fungus converted (+)-2a-hydroxy-3-<br />
pinanone (414¢) mainly to 2a, 5-dihydroxy-3-pinanone (415¢), 2a,9-dihydroxy-3-pinanone (416¢),<br />
<strong>and</strong> (-)-pinane-2a,3a,5-triol (419ba¢) (Noma et al., 2003, 2004) (Figure 14.196).<br />
Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 metabolized b-pinene (1), isopinocamphone (414b), 2a-hydroxy-3-<br />
pinanone (414a), <strong>and</strong> pinane-2,3-diol (419ab) as shown in Figure 14.197. On the other h<strong>and</strong>,<br />
Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 <strong>and</strong> Botrytis cinerea metabolized b-pinene (1¢), isopinocamphone<br />
(414b¢), 2a-hydroxy-3-pinanone (414a¢), <strong>and</strong> pinane-2,3-diol (419ab¢) as shown in Figure 14.198.<br />
Relationship <strong>of</strong> the metabolism <strong>of</strong> b-pinene (1, 1¢), isopinocamphone (414b, 414b¢), 2a-hydroxy-3-<br />
pinanone (414a, 414a¢), <strong>and</strong> pinane-2,3-diol (419ab, 419ab¢) in Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 <strong>and</strong><br />
Botrytis cinerea is shown in Figures 14.197 <strong>and</strong> 14.198.<br />
OH<br />
415'<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
A. niger<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
414<br />
OH<br />
415<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
A. niger<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
A. niger<br />
A. niger<br />
OH<br />
415'<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
419'<br />
414'<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
416'<br />
FIGURE 14.196 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)- (414) <strong>and</strong> (+)-2-hydroxy-3-pinanone (414¢) by Aspergillus niger<br />
TBUYN-2. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 2003. Proc. 47th TEAC, pp. 91–93; Noma, Y. et al., 2004. Proc.<br />
48th TEAC, pp. 390–392.)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 707<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
A.n.<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
1<br />
OH<br />
A.n.<br />
418ab<br />
O<br />
A.n.<br />
A.n.<br />
OH<br />
415ab<br />
A.n.<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
A.n.<br />
OH<br />
415<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
420ba<br />
414b<br />
414a<br />
HO<br />
416b<br />
FIGURE 14.197 Relationship <strong>of</strong> the metabolism <strong>of</strong> b-pinene (1), isopinocamphone (414b), 2a-hydroxy-3-<br />
pinanone (414a), <strong>and</strong> pinane-2,3-diol (419ab) in Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2. (Modified from Noma, Y. et al.,<br />
2003. Proc. 47th TEAC, pp. 91–93; Noma, Y. et al., 2004. Proc. 48th TEAC, pp. 390–392.)<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
A.n.<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
B.c.<br />
A.n.<br />
1'<br />
A.n.<br />
418ab'<br />
A.n.<br />
OH<br />
419ab'<br />
A.n.<br />
OH<br />
415a'<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
A.n.<br />
OH<br />
A.n.<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
414a'<br />
416b'<br />
420ba'<br />
414b'<br />
FIGURE 14.198 Relationship <strong>of</strong> the metabolism <strong>of</strong> b-pinene (1¢), isopinocamphone (414b¢), 2a-hydroxy-<br />
3-pinanone (414a¢), <strong>and</strong> pinane-2,3-diol (419ab¢) in Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 <strong>and</strong> Botrytis cinerea.<br />
(Modified from Noma, Y. et al., 2003. Proc. 47th TEAC, pp. 91–93; Noma, Y. et al., 2004. Proc. 48th TEAC,<br />
pp. 390–392.)<br />
14.4.4.2.4.1 Mosquitocidal <strong>and</strong> Knock-Down Activity Knock-down <strong>and</strong> mortality activity<br />
toward mosquito, Culex quinequefasciatus, was carried out for the metabolites <strong>of</strong> (+)- (418ab) <strong>and</strong><br />
(-)-pinane-2,3-diols (418ab¢) <strong>and</strong> (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-2-hydroxy-3-pinanones (414 <strong>and</strong> 414¢) by Dr. Radhika<br />
Samarasekera, Industrial <strong>Technology</strong> Institute, Sri Lanka. (-)-2-Hydroxy-3-pinanone (414¢) showed<br />
the mosquito knock-down activity <strong>and</strong> the mosqutocidal activity at the concentration <strong>of</strong> 1% <strong>and</strong> 2%<br />
(Table 14.16).<br />
14.4.4.2.4.2 Antimicrobial Activity The microorganisms were refreshed in Mueller Hilton<br />
Broth (Merck) at 35–37∞C, <strong>and</strong> inoculated on Mueller Hinton Agar (Mast Diagnostics, Merseyside,<br />
UK) media for preparation <strong>of</strong> inoculum. Escherichia coli (NRRL B-3008), Pseudomonas aeruginosa<br />
(ATCC 27853), Enterobacter aerogenes (NRRL 3567), Salmonella typhimurium (NRRL<br />
B-4420), Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 12228), Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus<br />
(MRSA, Clinical isolate, Osmangazi University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Eskisehir, Turkey), <strong>and</strong><br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans (Clinical Isolate, Osmangazi University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Eskisehir, Turkey)
708 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 14.16<br />
Knock-down <strong>and</strong> Mortality Activity Toward Mosquito a<br />
Compounds Knock-Down (%) Mortality (%)<br />
(+)-2,5-Dihydroxy-3-pinanone (415, 2%) 27 20<br />
(-)-2,5-Dihydroxy-3-pinanone (415¢, 2%) NT 7<br />
(+)-2-Hydroxy-3-pinanone (414, 2%) 40 33<br />
(-)-2-Hydroxy-3-pinanone (414¢, 2%) 100 40<br />
(-)-2-Hydroxy-3-pinanone (414¢, 1%) 53 7<br />
(+)-Pinane-2,3,5-triol (419, 2%) NT NT<br />
(-)-Pinane-2,3,5-triol (419, 2%) 13 NT<br />
(+)-Pinane-2,3-diol (418, 2%) NT NT<br />
(-)-Pinane-2,3-diol (418¢, 2%) NT NT<br />
a<br />
The results are against Culex quinequefasciatus.<br />
were used as pathogen test microorganisms. Microdilution broth susceptibility assay (R1, R2) was<br />
used for the antimicrobial evaluation <strong>of</strong> the samples. Stock solutions were prepared in DMSO<br />
(Carlo-Erba). Dilution series were prepared from 2 mg/mL in sterile distilled water in micro-test<br />
tubes from where they were transferred to 96-well micro-titer plates. Overnight grown bacterial <strong>and</strong><br />
c<strong>and</strong>ial suspensions in double strength Mueller–Hilton broth (Merck) was st<strong>and</strong>ardized to approximately<br />
10 8 CFU/mL using McFarl<strong>and</strong> No:0.5 (10 6 CFU/mL for C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans). A volume <strong>of</strong><br />
100 mL <strong>of</strong> each bacterial suspension was then added to each well. The last row containing only the<br />
serial dilutions <strong>of</strong> samples without microorganism was used as negative control. Sterile distilled<br />
water, medium, <strong>and</strong> microorganisms served as a positive growth control. After incubation at 37∞C<br />
for a 24 h the first well without turbidity was determined as the minimal inhibition concentration<br />
(MIC), chloramphenicol (Sigma), ampicillin (sigma), <strong>and</strong> ketoconazole (Sigma) were used as st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
antimicrobial agents (Koneman et al., 1997; Amsterdam, 1997) (Table 14.17).<br />
TABLE 14.17<br />
Biological Activity <strong>of</strong> Pinane-2,3,5-Triol (419 <strong>and</strong> 419¢), 2,5-Dihydroxy-3-Pinanone<br />
(415 <strong>and</strong> 415¢), <strong>and</strong> 7-Hydroxymethyl-1-p-menthene-8-ol (453¢) Toward MRSA<br />
MIC (mg/mL)<br />
Compounds<br />
Control<br />
Microorganisms 419 415¢ 415 419¢ 453¢ ST1 ST2 ST3<br />
Escherichia coli 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.007 0.0039 Nt<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 0.5 0.125 0.125 0.25 0.25 0.002 0.0078 Nt<br />
Enterobacter aerogenes 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.5 1.00 0.007 0.0019 Nt<br />
Salmonella typhimurium 0.25 0.125 0.125 0.25 0.25 0.01 0.0019 Nt<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans 0.5 0.125 0.125 0.25 1.00 Nt Nt 0.0625<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.5 1.00 0.002 0.0009 Nt<br />
MRSA 0.25 0.125 0.125 0.25 0.125 0.5 0.031 Nt<br />
Source: Iscan (2005, unpublished data).<br />
MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Nt, not tested; ST1, ampicillin-Na (Sigma); ST2, chloramphenicol<br />
(Sigma); ST3, ketoconazole (sigma).
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 709<br />
14.5 SUMMARY<br />
14.5.1 METABOLIC PATHWAYS OF MONOTERPENOIDS BY MICROORGANISMS<br />
About 50 years are over since the hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> a-pinene (4) was reported by Aspergillus niger<br />
in 1960 (Bhattacharyya et al., 1960). During these years many investigators have studied the biotransformation<br />
<strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> monoterpenoids by using various kinds <strong>of</strong> microorganisms. Now we<br />
summarize the microbiological transformation <strong>of</strong> monoterpenoids according to the literatures listed<br />
in the references including the metabolic pathways (Figures 14.199 through 14.206) for the further<br />
development <strong>of</strong> the investigation on microbiological transformation <strong>of</strong> terpenoids.<br />
Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> b-pinene (1), a-pinene (4), fenchol (11), fenchone (12), thujone (28),<br />
carvotanacetone (47), <strong>and</strong> sobrerol (43) are summarized in Figure 14.199. In general, b-pinene (1)<br />
is metabolized by six pathways. At first, b-pinene (1) is metabolized via a-pinene (4) to many<br />
metabolites such as myrtenol (5) (Shukla et al., 1968; Shukla <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya, 1968), verbenol<br />
(23) (Bhattacharyya et al., 1960; Prema <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya, 1962), <strong>and</strong> thujone (28) (Gibbon <strong>and</strong><br />
Pirt, 1971). Myrtenol (5) is further metabolized to myrtenal (6) <strong>and</strong> myrtenic acid (7). Verbenol<br />
(23) is further metabolized to verbenone (24), 7-hydroxyverbenone (25), 7-hydroxyverbanone<br />
(26), <strong>and</strong> 7-formyl verbanone (27). Thujone (28) is further metabolized to thujoyl alcohol (29),<br />
1-hydroxythujone (30), <strong>and</strong> 1,3-dihydroxythujone (31). Secondly, b-pinene (1) is metabolized to<br />
pinocarveol (2) <strong>and</strong> pinocarvone (3) (Ganapathy <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya, unpublished data).<br />
Pinocarvone (3) is further metabolized to isopinocamphone (413), which is further hydroxylated<br />
to give 2-hydroxy-3-pinanone (414). Compound 414 is further metabolized to give pinane-2,3-<br />
diol (419), 2,5- dihydroxy- (415), <strong>and</strong> 2,9-dihydroxy-3-pinanone (416). Thirdly, b-pinene (1) is<br />
metabolized to a-fenchol (11) <strong>and</strong> fenchone (12) (Dhavlikar et al., 1974), which are further<br />
metabolized to 6-hydroxy- (13) <strong>and</strong> 5-hydroxyfenchone (14), 5-ox<strong>of</strong>enchone (15), fenchone-9-al<br />
(17), fenchone-9-oic acid (18) via 9-hydroxyfenchone (16), 2,3-fencholide (21), <strong>and</strong> 1,2-fencholide<br />
(22) (Pfrunder <strong>and</strong> Tamm, 1969a, 1969b; Yamamoto, et al., 1984; Christensen <strong>and</strong> Tuthill, 1985;<br />
Miyazawa et al., 1990a, 1969b). Fenchol (12) is also metabolized to 9-hydroxyfenchol (466) <strong>and</strong><br />
7-hydroxyfenchol (467), 6-hydroxyfenchol (349), <strong>and</strong> 6,7-dihydroxyfenchol (412). Fourthly,<br />
b-pinene (1) is metabolized via fenchoquinone (19) to 2-hydroxyfenchone (20) (Pfrunder <strong>and</strong><br />
Tamm 1969b; Gibbon et al., 1972). Fifthly, b-pinene (1) is metabolized to a-terpineol (34) via<br />
pinyl cation (32) <strong>and</strong> 1-p-menthene-8-cation (33) (Hosler, 1969; Hayashi et al., 1972; Saeki <strong>and</strong><br />
Hashimoto, 1968, 1971). a-Terpineol (34) is metabolized to 8,9-epoxy-1-p-menthanol (58) via<br />
diepoxide (57), terpine hydrate (60), <strong>and</strong> oleuropeic acid (204) (Shukla et al., 1968; Shukla <strong>and</strong><br />
Bhattacharyya, 1968; Hosler 1969; Hungund et al., 1970; Hayashi et al., 1972; Saeki <strong>and</strong><br />
Hashimoto, 1968, 1971). As shown in Figure 14.202, oleuropeic acid (204) is formed from linalool<br />
(206) <strong>and</strong> a-terpineol (34) via 204, 205, <strong>and</strong> 213 as intermediates (Shukla et al., 1968; Shukla<br />
<strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya, 1968; Hungund et al., 1970) <strong>and</strong> degradatively metabolized to perillic acid<br />
(82), 2-hydroxy-8-p-menthen-7-oic acid (84), 2-oxo-8-p-menthen-7-oic acid (84), 2-oxo-8-p-menthen-1-oic<br />
acid (85), <strong>and</strong> b-isopropyl pimelic acid (86) (Shukla et al., 1968; Shukla <strong>and</strong><br />
Bhattacharyya, 1968; Hungund et al., 1970). Oleuropeic acid (204) is also formed from b-pinene<br />
(1) via a-terpineol (34) as the intermediate (Noma et al., 2001). Oleuropeic acid (204) is also<br />
formed from myrtenol (5) by rearrangement reaction by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 (Noma <strong>and</strong><br />
Asakawa 2005b). Finally, b-pinene (1) is metabolized to borneol (36) <strong>and</strong> camphor (37) via two<br />
cations (32 <strong>and</strong> 35) <strong>and</strong> to 1-p-menthene (62) via two cations (33 <strong>and</strong> 59) (Shukla <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya,<br />
1968). 1-p-Menthene (62) is metabolized to phell<strong>and</strong>ric acid (65) via phell<strong>and</strong>rol (63) <strong>and</strong><br />
phell<strong>and</strong>ral (64), which is further degradatively metabolized through 246–251 <strong>and</strong> 89 to water<br />
<strong>and</strong> carbon dioxide as shown in Figure 14.204 (Shukla et al., 1968). Phell<strong>and</strong>ral (64) is easily<br />
reduced to give phell<strong>and</strong>rol (63) by Euglena sp. <strong>and</strong> Dunaliella sp. (Noma et al., 1984, 1986,<br />
1991a, 1991b; 1992d). Furthermore, 1-p-menthene (62) is metabolized to 1-p-menthen-2-ol (46)<br />
<strong>and</strong> p-menthane-1,2-diol (54) as shown in Figure 14.204. Perillic acid (82) is easily formed from<br />
perill<strong>and</strong>ehyde (78) <strong>and</strong> perillyl alcohol (74) (Figure 14.19) (Swamy et al., 1965; Dhavalikar <strong>and</strong>
710 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
CHO<br />
OH<br />
419<br />
O<br />
418<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
416<br />
OH<br />
414<br />
OH<br />
415<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
+<br />
413<br />
3<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
7<br />
CHO<br />
6<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
204<br />
O<br />
24<br />
O<br />
26 27<br />
25<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
37<br />
36<br />
35<br />
+<br />
2<br />
5<br />
23<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
30<br />
OH<br />
31<br />
453<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
34<br />
13<br />
412<br />
OH<br />
466<br />
349<br />
14<br />
15<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
+<br />
33<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
11<br />
12<br />
17<br />
CHO<br />
18<br />
COOH<br />
32<br />
OH<br />
476<br />
16<br />
O<br />
O<br />
o<br />
o<br />
1<br />
11<br />
12<br />
19<br />
20<br />
22<br />
21<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
4<br />
67 COOH<br />
+<br />
32<br />
+<br />
33<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
45<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
28<br />
O<br />
Fig. 201<br />
COOH<br />
177<br />
38<br />
46<br />
81<br />
HO<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
CHO<br />
COOH<br />
CHO<br />
39 40<br />
176<br />
175<br />
174<br />
FIGURE 14.199 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> b-pinene (1), a-pinene (4), fenchone (9), thujone (28), <strong>and</strong> carvotanacetone<br />
(44) by microorganisms.<br />
34<br />
Fig. 201<br />
& 203<br />
50<br />
OH<br />
42 +<br />
43<br />
44<br />
OH<br />
93<br />
29<br />
47<br />
68<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
334<br />
Fig. 205<br />
& 202<br />
171<br />
56<br />
172<br />
173<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
COOH
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 711<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
121<br />
120<br />
OH<br />
OH OH CHO COOH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
119<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
114<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
116<br />
OH O<br />
HO<br />
54<br />
115<br />
OH<br />
+<br />
33<br />
62<br />
O<br />
63 64 65<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
66<br />
378<br />
68<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
118<br />
112<br />
OH<br />
111<br />
OH<br />
110<br />
69<br />
71 72<br />
OH<br />
101<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH O<br />
117<br />
OH O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
157<br />
113<br />
68<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
68<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
91<br />
OH<br />
92<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
100<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
58 57<br />
COOH OH<br />
61<br />
Fig.205<br />
OH<br />
204<br />
122<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
334<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
34<br />
125<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
76<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
77<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
90<br />
75<br />
OH<br />
74<br />
CHO<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
81<br />
81<br />
96<br />
97<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
94<br />
93<br />
105<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
98 99<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
378<br />
101<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
106<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
102<br />
OH<br />
81<br />
OH OH<br />
Fig.205<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
44<br />
O<br />
70 COOH OAc<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
85<br />
86 87<br />
84<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
82<br />
88 89<br />
COOH<br />
78<br />
COOH<br />
83<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
109<br />
O OH OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
103 104 50<br />
45<br />
FIGURE 14.200 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> limonene (68), perillyl alcohol (74), carvone (93), isopiperitenone<br />
(111), <strong>and</strong> piperitenone (112) by microorganisms.
712 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
HO<br />
COOH<br />
162<br />
O<br />
COOH<br />
89<br />
199<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
COOH<br />
198<br />
COOH<br />
197<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
201<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
158 159 157 155<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
200<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
COOH<br />
196<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
161<br />
169<br />
OH<br />
CHO<br />
O<br />
170<br />
160<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
COOH<br />
185<br />
COOH<br />
195<br />
O<br />
168<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
COOH<br />
194<br />
477<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
156<br />
O<br />
167<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
CHO<br />
166<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
151<br />
164 163<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
193<br />
475<br />
358<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
150<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
CHO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
192<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
191<br />
O<br />
HOOC<br />
154<br />
OH<br />
149<br />
148<br />
181<br />
180<br />
179<br />
178<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
471<br />
146<br />
O<br />
144<br />
143<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
145<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
137<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
188<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
138<br />
142<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
182 184<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
Fig. 200<br />
183 185<br />
189<br />
OH<br />
47<br />
139<br />
140<br />
141<br />
137-Ac<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
OH OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OAc<br />
OMe<br />
51<br />
52<br />
147<br />
COOH<br />
186<br />
O<br />
COOH<br />
89<br />
CH 3 COOH<br />
187<br />
346 351<br />
352<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OMe<br />
470<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
474<br />
OH<br />
477<br />
OH<br />
472<br />
COOH<br />
190<br />
COOH<br />
475-Me<br />
OH<br />
202<br />
OMe<br />
OMe<br />
473<br />
478<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
471=Me<br />
FIGURE 14.201 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> menthol (137), menthone (149), p-cymene (178), thymol (179),<br />
carvacrol methyl ether (201), <strong>and</strong> carvotanacetone (47) by microorganisms <strong>and</strong> rabbit.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 713<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
CHO<br />
86<br />
85<br />
OH<br />
84<br />
CHO<br />
82<br />
HOOC<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
61<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
205<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
+<br />
216<br />
215<br />
74<br />
78<br />
212 213<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O O O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
218<br />
217<br />
214 209 210 211<br />
HO HO HO<br />
+<br />
HOOC<br />
HOOC<br />
HOOC HOOC<br />
+<br />
224 223<br />
222<br />
221<br />
COOH OH<br />
220 219 206 207 208<br />
204<br />
34<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
125<br />
43<br />
Fig.200<br />
&2003<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O HO<br />
O<br />
OAc<br />
234 COOH HOOC COOH HOOC COOH<br />
233<br />
232<br />
COOH<br />
231<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
239<br />
COOH COOH<br />
COOH<br />
242 241<br />
240<br />
O<br />
O<br />
236<br />
HO<br />
COOH<br />
230<br />
O<br />
O<br />
238<br />
O<br />
235<br />
229<br />
O<br />
237<br />
O<br />
228<br />
37<br />
243<br />
227<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
36<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
34<br />
226<br />
+<br />
35<br />
+<br />
33<br />
+<br />
33<br />
+<br />
32<br />
1<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
245<br />
O<br />
244<br />
O<br />
OH . H 2 O<br />
+<br />
60<br />
59<br />
COOH<br />
CO 2 89 COOH<br />
+ +<br />
H 2 O O O<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
COOH<br />
CHO<br />
OH<br />
46<br />
251<br />
250<br />
249<br />
248<br />
247<br />
246<br />
65<br />
64<br />
63<br />
62<br />
HO<br />
COOH<br />
HO<br />
CHO HO<br />
OH HO<br />
OH HO<br />
HO<br />
257<br />
256<br />
255<br />
253<br />
252<br />
66<br />
54<br />
HO<br />
FIGURE 14.202 Metabolic pathway <strong>of</strong> borneol (36), camphor (37), phell<strong>and</strong>ral (64), linalool (206), <strong>and</strong><br />
p-menthane (252) by microorganisms.<br />
254<br />
OH
714 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
CH 2 OH<br />
Fig. 202<br />
263<br />
OH<br />
137<br />
OAc<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
269<br />
CH 2 OAc<br />
OH<br />
260<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
O<br />
259 268<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
OH<br />
266<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
OH<br />
265<br />
294<br />
267<br />
OAc<br />
OH<br />
68<br />
Fig. 200<br />
& 201<br />
294<br />
137<br />
262<br />
273<br />
COOH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
O<br />
206<br />
OH<br />
CH 2 COOH<br />
CO 2<br />
261<br />
CHO<br />
272<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CHO<br />
258<br />
COOH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
271<br />
275 276<br />
264<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CHO<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
277<br />
281<br />
278<br />
H 2 O<br />
O<br />
CH 2 COOH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
279<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
282<br />
283<br />
284<br />
280<br />
HOOC<br />
COOH<br />
CO 2<br />
+<br />
H 2 O<br />
286<br />
285<br />
CH 2 OAc<br />
O<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
270<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
299 274<br />
OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
OH<br />
292<br />
OH<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
O<br />
293<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
298<br />
294<br />
O<br />
287<br />
291<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
OH<br />
300<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
CH O<br />
OH<br />
266<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
288<br />
COOH<br />
COOH<br />
289<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
295<br />
O<br />
O<br />
290<br />
296<br />
FIGURE 14.203 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> citronellal (258), geraniol (271), nerol (272), <strong>and</strong> citral (275 <strong>and</strong><br />
276) by microorganisms.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 715<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
373<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
371<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
372<br />
OAc<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
342<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
49-Ac<br />
50<br />
OH<br />
136<br />
132 133<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
55<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
49<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
45<br />
O<br />
102<br />
O<br />
101 93<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
134<br />
131<br />
O<br />
135<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
54<br />
53<br />
HO<br />
48<br />
O<br />
44<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
130<br />
OH<br />
34<br />
68<br />
1 4<br />
+<br />
HO<br />
51<br />
O<br />
47<br />
OH<br />
126<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
125<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
123<br />
O<br />
O<br />
124<br />
32<br />
+<br />
33<br />
COOH<br />
52<br />
+<br />
59<br />
CHO<br />
46<br />
62 54<br />
OH<br />
43<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
122<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
127<br />
OH<br />
129<br />
OH<br />
Fig.203<br />
128<br />
65<br />
64<br />
63<br />
66<br />
FIGURE 14.204 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole (122), 1,4-cineole (131), phell<strong>and</strong>rene (62), <strong>and</strong><br />
carvotanacetone (47) by microorganisms.
716 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
307 308<br />
OH<br />
303<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
305<br />
302<br />
OH<br />
304<br />
OH<br />
306<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
309<br />
FIGURE 14.205 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> myrcene (302) <strong>and</strong> citronellene (309) by rat <strong>and</strong> microorganisms.<br />
310<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
454<br />
O<br />
452<br />
OH<br />
453<br />
456<br />
O<br />
455<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
5<br />
OH<br />
204<br />
FIGURE 14.206 Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> nopol (452) <strong>and</strong> nopol benzyl ether (455) by microorganisms.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 717<br />
Bhattacharyya, 1966; Dhavalikar et al., 1966; Ballal et al., 1967; Kayahara et al., 1973; Shima et al.,<br />
1972). a-Terpineol (34) is also formed from linalool (206). a-Pinene (4) is metabolized by five<br />
pathways as follows: firstly, a-pinene (4) is metabolized to myrtenol (5), myrtenal (6), <strong>and</strong><br />
myratenoic acid (7) (Shukla et al., 1968; Shukla <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya, 1968; Hungund et al., 1970;<br />
Ganapathy <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya, unpublished results). Myrtenal (6) is easily reduced to myrtenol<br />
(5) by Euglena <strong>and</strong> Dunaliella spp., (Noma et al., 1991a, 1991b; 1992d). Myrtanol (8) is metabolized<br />
to 3-hydroxy- (9) <strong>and</strong> 4-hydroxymyrtanol (10) (Miyazawa et al., 1994b). Secondly, a-pinene<br />
(4) is metabolized to verbenol (23), verbenone (24), 7-hydroxyverbenone (25), <strong>and</strong> verbanone-7-al<br />
(27) (Bhattacharyya et al., 1960; Prema <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya, 1962; Miyazawa et al., 1991d).<br />
Thirdly, a-pinene (4) is metabolized to thujone (28), thujoyl alcohol (29), 1-hydroxy- (30), <strong>and</strong><br />
1,3-dihydroxythujone (31) (Gibbon <strong>and</strong> Pirt, 1971; Miyazawa et al., 1992a; Noma, 2000). Fourthly,<br />
a-pinene (4) is metabolized to sobrerol (43) <strong>and</strong> carvotanacetol (46, 1-p-menthen-2-ol) via<br />
a-pinene epoxide (38) <strong>and</strong> two cations (41 <strong>and</strong> 42). Sobrerol (43) is further metabolized to<br />
8-hydroxycarvotanacetone (44, carvonhydrate), 8-hydrocarvomenthone (45), <strong>and</strong> p-menthane-2,8-<br />
diol (50) (Prema <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya, 1962; Noma, 2007). In the metabolism <strong>of</strong> sobrerol (43),<br />
8-hydroxycarvotanacetone (44), <strong>and</strong> 8-hydroxycarvomenthone (45) by Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2,<br />
the formation <strong>of</strong> p-menthane-2,8-diol (50) is very high enantio- <strong>and</strong> diastereoselective in the<br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> 8-hydroxycarvomenthone (Noma, 2007). 8-Hydroxycarvotanacetone (44) is a common<br />
metabolite from sobrerol (43) <strong>and</strong> carvotanacetone (47). Namely, carvotanacetone (47) is<br />
metabolized to carvomenthone (48), carvomenthol (49), 8-hydroxycarvomenthol (50), 5-hydroxycarvotanacetone<br />
(51), 8-hydroxycarvotanacetone (44), 5-hydroxycarvomenthone (52), <strong>and</strong> 2,3-<br />
lactone (56) (Gibbon <strong>and</strong> Pirt, 1971; Gibbon et al., 1972, Noma et al., 1974a; 1985c; 1988b).<br />
Carvomenthone (48) is metabolized to 45, 8-hydroxycarvomenthol (50), 1-hydroxycarvomenthone<br />
(53), <strong>and</strong> p-menthane-1,2-diol (54) (Noma et al., 1985b, 1988b). Compound 52 is metabolized to<br />
6-hydroxymenthol (139), which is the common metabolite <strong>of</strong> menthol (137) (see Figure 14.201).<br />
Carvomenthol (49) is metabolized to 8-hydroxycarvomenthol (50) <strong>and</strong> p-menthane-2,<br />
9-diol (55). Finally, a-pinene (4) to borneol (36) <strong>and</strong> camphor (37) via 32 <strong>and</strong> 35 <strong>and</strong> to phell<strong>and</strong>rene<br />
(62) via 32 <strong>and</strong> two cations (33 <strong>and</strong> 59) as mentioned in the metabolism <strong>of</strong> b-pinene (1).<br />
Carvotanacetone (47) is also metabolized degradatively to 3,4-dimethylvaleric acid (177) via 56<br />
<strong>and</strong> 158-163 as shown in Figure 201 (Gibbon <strong>and</strong> Pirt, 1971; Gibbon et al., 1972). a-Pinene (4) is<br />
also metabolized to 2-(4-methyl-3-cyclohexenylidene)-propionic acid (67) (Figure 14.199).<br />
Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> limonene (68), perillyl alcohol (74), carvone (93), isopiperitenone (111),<br />
<strong>and</strong> piperitenone (112) are summarized in Figure 14.199. Limonene (68) is metabolized by eight<br />
pathways. Namely, limonene (68) is converted into a-terpineol (34) (Savithiry et al., 1997), limonene-<br />
1,2-epoxide (69), 1-p-menthene-9-oic acid (70), perillyl alcohol (74), 1-p-menthene-8,9-diol (79),<br />
isopiperitenol (110), p-mentha-1,8-diene-4-ol (80, 4-terpineol), <strong>and</strong> carveol (81) (Dhavalikar <strong>and</strong><br />
Bhattacharyya, 1966; Dhavalikar et al., 1966; Bowen, 1975; Miyazawa et al., 1983; Van der Werf<br />
et al., 1997; Savithrry et al., 1997; Van der Werf <strong>and</strong> de Bont, 1998a, 1998b; Noma et al., 1982,<br />
1992d). Dihdyrocarvone (101), limonene-1,2-diol (71), 1-hydroxy-8-p-menthene-2-one (72), <strong>and</strong><br />
p-mentha-2,8-diene-1-ol (73) are formed from limonene (68) via limonene epoxide (69) as intermediate.<br />
Limonene (68) is also metabolized via carveol (78), limonene-1,2-diol (71), carvone (93),<br />
1-p-menthene-6,9-diol (95), 8,9-dihydroxy-1-p-menthene (90), a-terpineol (34), 2a-hydroxy-1,8-<br />
cineole (125), <strong>and</strong> p-menthane-1,2,8-triol (334). Bottrospicatol (92) <strong>and</strong> 5-hydroxycarveol (94) are<br />
formed from cis-carveol by Streptomyces bottropensis SY-2-1 (Noma et al., 1982; Nishimura et al.,<br />
1983a; Noma <strong>and</strong> Nishimura, 1992; Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 1992). Carveyl acetate <strong>and</strong> carveyl<br />
propionate (both are shown as 106) are hydrolyzed enantio- <strong>and</strong> diastereoselectively to carveol (78)<br />
(Oritani <strong>and</strong> Yamashita, 1980; Noma, 2000). Carvone (93) is metabolized through four pathways as<br />
follows: firstly, carvone (93) is reduced to carveol (81) (Noma, 1980). Secondly, it is epoxidized to<br />
carvone-8,9-epoxide (96), which is further metabolized to dihydrocarvone-8,9-epoxide (97), dihydrocarveol-8,9-epoxide<br />
(103), <strong>and</strong> menthane-2,8,9-triol (104) (Noma, 2000; Noma et al., 1980; Noma<br />
<strong>and</strong> Nishimura, 1982). Thirdly, 93 is hydroxylated to 5-hydroxycarvone (98), 5-hydroxydihydrocarvone
718 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
(99), <strong>and</strong> 5-hydroxydihydrocarveol (100) (Noma <strong>and</strong> Nishimura, 1982). Dihydrocarvone (101) is<br />
metabolized to 8-p-menthene-1,2-diol (71) via l-hydroxydihydrocarvone (72), 10-hydroxydihydrocarvone<br />
(106), <strong>and</strong> dihydrocarveol (102), which is metabolized to 10-hydroxydihydrocarveol (107),<br />
p-menthane-2,8-diol (50), dihydrocarveol-8,9-epoxide (100), p-menthane-2,8,9-triol (104), <strong>and</strong><br />
dihydrobottrospicatol (105) (Noma et al., 1985a, 1985b). In the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-carvone by<br />
plant pathogenic fungi, Aspergillus niger Tiegh, isodihydrocarvone (101) was metabolized to<br />
4-hydroxyisodihydrocarvone (378) <strong>and</strong> 1-hydroxyisodihydrocarvone (72) (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa,<br />
2008). 8,9-Epoxydihydrocarveyl acetate (109) is hydrolyzed to 8,9-epoxydihydrocarveol (103).<br />
Perillyl alcohol (74) is metabolized through three pathways to shisool (75), shisool-8,9-epoxide<br />
(76), perillyl alcohol-8,9-epoxide (77), perilladehyde (78), perillic acid (82), <strong>and</strong> 4,9-dihydroxy-1-pmenthen-7-oic<br />
acid (83). Perillic acid (82) is metabolized degradatively to 84–89 as shown in<br />
Figure 14.200 (Swamy et al., 1965; Dhavalikar <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya, 1966; Dhavalikar et al., 1966;<br />
Ballal et al., 1967; Shukla et al., 1968; Shukala <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya, 1968; Hungund et al., 1977;<br />
Kayahara et al., 1973; Shima et al., 1972). Isopiperitenol (110) is reduced to isopiperitenone (111),<br />
which is metabolized to 3-hydroxy- (115), 4-hydroxy- (116), 7-hydroxy- (113) <strong>and</strong> 10-hydroxyisopiperitenone<br />
(114), <strong>and</strong> piperitenone (112). Compounds isopiperitenone (111) <strong>and</strong> piperitenone<br />
(112) are isomerized to each other (Noma et al., 1992c). Furthermore, piperitenone (112) is metabolized<br />
to 8-hydroxypiperitone (157), 5-hydroxy- (117) <strong>and</strong> 7-hydroxypiperitenone (118). Pulegone<br />
(119) is metabolized to 112, 8-hydroxymenthenone (121), <strong>and</strong> 8,9-dehydromenthenone (120).<br />
Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> menthol (137), menthone (149), thymol (179), <strong>and</strong> carvacryol methyl ether<br />
(202) are summarized in Figure 14.201. Menthol (137) is generally hydroxylated to give 1-hydroxy-<br />
(138), 2-hydroxy- (140), 4-hydroxy- (141), 6-hydroxy- (139), 7-hydroxy- (143), 8-hydroxy- (142), <strong>and</strong><br />
9-hydroxymenthol (144) <strong>and</strong> 1,8-dihydroxy- (146) <strong>and</strong> 7,8-dihydroxymenthol (148) (Asakawa et al.,<br />
1991; Takahashi et al., 1994; Van der Werf et al., 1997). Racemic menthyl acetate <strong>and</strong> menthylchloroacetate<br />
are hydrolyzed asymmetrically by an esterase <strong>of</strong> microorganisms (Brit Patent, 1970; Moroe<br />
et al., 1971; Watanabe <strong>and</strong> Inagaki, 1977a, 1977b). Menthone (149) is reductively metabolized to 137<br />
<strong>and</strong> oxidatively metabolized to 3,7-dimethyl-6-hydroxyoctanoic acid (152), 3,7-dimethyl-6-<br />
oxooctanoic acid (153), 2-methyl-2,5-oxidoheptenoic acid (154), 1-hydroxymenthone (150), piperitone<br />
(156), 7-hydroxymenthone (151), menthone-7-al (163), menthone-7-oic acid (164), <strong>and</strong><br />
7-carboxylmenthol (165) (Sawamura et al., 1974). Compound 156 is metabolized to menthone-1,2-<br />
diol (155) (Miyazawa et al., 1991e, 1992d,e). Compound 148 is metabolized to 6-hydroxy- (158),<br />
8-hydroxy- (157), <strong>and</strong> 9-hydroxypiperitone (159), piperitone-7-al (160), 7-hydroxypiperitone (161),<br />
<strong>and</strong> piperitone-7-oic acid (162) (Lassak et al., 1973). Compound 149 is also formed from menthenone<br />
(148) by hydrogenation (Mukherjee et al., 1973), which is metabolized to 6-hydroxymenthenone<br />
(181, 6-hydroxy-4-p-menthen-3-one). 6-hydroxymenthenone (181) is also formed from thymol<br />
(179) via 6-hydroxythymol (180). 6-Hydroxythymol (180) is degradatively metabolized through<br />
182–185 to 186, 187, <strong>and</strong> 89 (Mukherjee et al., 1974). Piperitone oxide (166) is metabolized to<br />
1-hydroxymenthone (150) <strong>and</strong> 4-hydroxypiperitone (167) (Lassak et al., 1973; Miyazawa et al.,<br />
1991e). Piperitenone oxide (168) is metabolized to 1-hydroxymenthone (150), 1-hydroxypulegone<br />
(169), <strong>and</strong> 2,3-seco-p-menthalacetone-3-en-1-ol (170) (Lassak et al., 1973; Miyazawa et al., 1991e).<br />
p-Cymene (178) is metabolized to 8-hydroxy- (188) <strong>and</strong> 9-hydroxy-p-cymene (189), 2- (4-methylphenyl)-propanic<br />
acid (190), thymol (179), <strong>and</strong> cumin alcohol (192), which is further converted<br />
degradatively to p-cumin aldehyde (193), cumic acid (194), cis-2,3-dihydroxy-2,3-dihydro-p-cumic<br />
acid (195), 2,3-dihydroxy-p-cumic acid (197), 198–200, <strong>and</strong> 89 as shown in Figure 14.3 (Chamberlain<br />
<strong>and</strong> Dagley, 1968; DeFrank <strong>and</strong> Ribbons, 1977a, 1977b; Hudlicky et al., 1999; Noma, 2000).<br />
Compound 197 is also metabolized to 4-methyl-2-oxopentanoic acid (201) (DeFrank <strong>and</strong><br />
Ribbons, 1977a). Compound 193 is easily metabolized to 192 <strong>and</strong> 194 (Noma et al., 1991a, 1992).<br />
Carvacrol methyl ether (202) is easily metabolized to 7-hydroxycarvacrol methyl ether (203)<br />
(Noma, 2000).<br />
Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> borneol (36), camphor (37), phell<strong>and</strong>ral (64), linalool (206), <strong>and</strong> p-menthane<br />
(252) are summarized in Figure 14.202. Borneol (36) is formed from b-pinene (1), a-pinene
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 719<br />
(4), 34, bornyl acetate (226), <strong>and</strong> camphene (229) <strong>and</strong> it is metabolized to 36, 3-hydroxy- (243),<br />
5-hydroxy- (235), 6-hydroxy- (228), <strong>and</strong> 9-hydroxycamphor (225), <strong>and</strong> 1,2-campholide (23).<br />
Compound 228 is degradatively metabolized to 6-oxocamphor (229) <strong>and</strong> 230–234, whereas 237 is<br />
also degradatively metabolized to 6-hydroxy-1,2-campholide (238), 6-oxo-1,2-campholide (239),<br />
<strong>and</strong> 240–242. 5-Hydroxycamphor (235) is metabolized to 238, 5-oxocamphor (236), <strong>and</strong> 6-oxo-1,2-<br />
campholide (239). Compound 243 is also metabolized to camphorquinone (244) <strong>and</strong> 2-hydroxyepicamphor<br />
(245) (Bradshaw et al., 1959; Conrad et al., 1961, 1965a, 1965b; Gunsalus et al., 1965;<br />
Chapman et al., 1966; Hartline <strong>and</strong> Gunsalus, 1971; Oritani <strong>and</strong> Yamashita, 1974). 1-p-Menthene<br />
(62) is formed 1 <strong>and</strong> 4 via three cations (32, 33, <strong>and</strong> 59) <strong>and</strong> metabolized to phell<strong>and</strong>rol (63) (Noma<br />
et al., 1991a) <strong>and</strong> p-menthane-1,2-diol (54). Compound 63 is metabolized to phell<strong>and</strong>ral (64) <strong>and</strong><br />
7-hydroxy-p-menthane (66). Compound 64 is furthermore metabolized degradatively to CO 2 <strong>and</strong><br />
water via phell<strong>and</strong>ric acid (65), 246–251, <strong>and</strong> 89 (Dhavalikar <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya, 1966; Dhavalikar<br />
et al., 1966; Bahhal et al., 1967; Shukla et al., 1968; Shukla <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya, 1968; Hungund<br />
et al., 1970). Compound 64 is also easily reduced to phell<strong>and</strong>rol (63) (Noma et al., 1991a, 1992a).<br />
p-Menthane (252) is metabolized via 1-hydroxy-p-menthane (253) to p-menthane-1,9-diol (254) <strong>and</strong><br />
p-menthane-1,7-diol (255) (Tukamoto et al., 1974, 1975; Noma et al., 1990). Compound 255 is degradatively<br />
metabolized via 256–248 to CO 2 <strong>and</strong> water through the degradation pathway <strong>of</strong> phell<strong>and</strong>ric<br />
acid (65, 246–251, <strong>and</strong> 89) as mentioned above. Linalool (206) is metabolized to a-terpineol<br />
(34), camphor (37), oleuropeic acid (61), 2-methyl-6-hydroxy-6-carboxy-2,7-octadiene (211),<br />
2-methyl-6-hydroxy-6-carboxy-7-octene (199), 5-methyl-5-vinyltetrahydro-2-furanol (215), 5-methyl-<br />
5-vinyltetrahydro-2-furanone (216), <strong>and</strong> malonyl ester (218). 1-Hydroxylinalool (219) is metabolized<br />
degradatively to 2,6-dimethyl-6-hydroxy-trans-2,7-octadienoic acid (220), 4-methyl-trans-3,<br />
5-hexadienoic acid (221), 4-methyl-trans-3,5-hexadienoic acid (222), 4-methyl-trans-2-hexenoic<br />
acid (223), <strong>and</strong> isobutyric acid (224). Compound 206 is furthermore metabolized via 213 to 61, 82,<br />
<strong>and</strong> 84–86 as shown in Figure 14.2 (Mizutani et al., 1971; Murakami et al., 1973; Rama Devi <strong>and</strong><br />
Bhattacharyya, 1977a, 1977b; Rama Devi et al., 1977; Madyastha et al., 1977; David <strong>and</strong> Veschambre,<br />
1985; Miyazawa et al., 1994a, 1994b).<br />
Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> citronellol (258), citronellal (261), geraniol (271), nerol (272), citral [neral<br />
(275) <strong>and</strong> geranial (276)], <strong>and</strong> myrcene (302) are summarized in Figure 14.203 (Seubert <strong>and</strong> Fass,<br />
1964; Hayashi et al., 1968; Rama Devi <strong>and</strong> Bhattacharyya, 1977a, 1977b). Geraniol (271) is formed<br />
from citronellol (258), nerol (272), linalool (206), <strong>and</strong> geranyl acetate (270) <strong>and</strong> metabolized through<br />
10 pathways. Namely, compound 271 is hydrogenated to give citronellol (258), which is metabolized<br />
to 2,8-dihydroxy-2,6-dimethyl octane (260) via 6,7-epoxycitronellol (268), isopulegol (267),<br />
limonene (68), 3,7-dimethyloctane-1,8-diol (266) via 3,7-dimethyl-6-octene-1,8-diol (265), 267, citronellal<br />
(261), dihydrocitronellol (259), <strong>and</strong> nerol (272). Citronellyl acetate (269) <strong>and</strong> isopulegyl<br />
acetate (301) are hydrolyzed to citronellol (258) <strong>and</strong> isopulegol (267), respectively. Compound 261<br />
is metabolized via pulegol (263) <strong>and</strong> isopulegol (267) to menthol (137). Compound 271 <strong>and</strong> 272 are<br />
isomerized to each other. Compound 272 is metabolized to 271, 258, citronellic acid (262), nerol-6-<br />
,7-epoxide (273), <strong>and</strong> neral (275). Compound 272 is metabolized to neric acid (277). Compounds<br />
275 <strong>and</strong> 276 are isomerized to each other. Compound 276 is completely decomposed to CO 2 <strong>and</strong><br />
water via geranic acid (278), 2,6-dimethyl-8-hydroxy-7-oxo-2-octene (279), 6-methyl-5-heptenoic<br />
acid (280), 7-methyl-3-oxo-6-octenoic acid (283), 6-methyl-5-heptenoic acid (284), 4-methyl-3-heptenoic<br />
acid (284), 4-methyl-3-pentenoic acid (285), <strong>and</strong> 3-methyl-2-butenoic acid (286). Furthermore,<br />
compound 271 is metabolized via 3-hydroxymethyl-2,6-octadiene-1-ol (287), 3-formyl-2,6-octadiene-1-ol<br />
(288), <strong>and</strong> 3-carboxy-2,6-octadiene-1-ol (289) to 3- (4-methyl-3-pentenyl)-3-butenolide<br />
(290). Geraniol (271) is also metabolized to 3,7-dimethyl-2,3-dihydroxy-6-octen-1-ol (292), 3,7-<br />
dimethyl-2-oxo-3-hydroxy-6-octen-1-ol (293), 2-methyl-6-oxo-2-heptene (294), 6-methyl-5-hepten-<br />
2-ol (298), 2-methyl-2-heptene-6-one-1-ol (295), <strong>and</strong> 2-methyl-g-butyrolactone (296). Furthermore,<br />
271 is metabolized to 7-methyl-3-oxo-6-octanoic acid (299), 7-hydroxymethyl-3-methyl-2,6-octadien-1-ol<br />
(291), 6,7-epoxygeraniol (274), 3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadiene-1,8-diol (300), <strong>and</strong> 3,7-<br />
dimethyloctane-1,8-diol (266).
720 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole (122), 1,4-cineole (131), phell<strong>and</strong>rene (62), carvotanacetone<br />
(47), <strong>and</strong> carvone (93) by micororganisms are summarized in Figure 14.204.<br />
1,8-Cineole (112) is biotransformed to 2-hydroxy- (125), 3-hydroxy- (123), <strong>and</strong> 9-hydroxy-1,8-<br />
cineole (127), 2-oxo- (126) <strong>and</strong> 3-oxo-1,8-cineole (124), lactone [128, (R)-5,5-dimethyl-4-(3¢oxobutyl)-4,5-dihydr<strong>of</strong>uran-2-(3H)-one]<br />
<strong>and</strong> p-hydroxytoluene (129) (MacRae et al., 1979,<br />
Nishimura et al., 1982; Noma <strong>and</strong> Sakai, 1984). 2-Hydroxy-1,8-cineole (125) is further converted<br />
into 2-oxo-1,8-cineole (126), 1,8-cineole-2-malonyl ester (130), sobrerol (43), <strong>and</strong> 8-hydroxycarvotanacetone<br />
(44) (Miyazawa et al., 1995b). 2-Hydroxy-1,8-cineole (125) <strong>and</strong> 2-oxo-1,8-cineole<br />
(126) are also biodegradated to sobrerol (43) <strong>and</strong> 8-hydroxycarvotanacetone (44), respectively.<br />
2-Hydroxy-1,8-cineole (125) was esterified to give malonyl ester (130). 2-Hydroxy-1,8-cineole (125)<br />
was formed from limonene (68) by Citrus pathogenic fungi, Penicillium digitatum (Noma <strong>and</strong><br />
Asakawa 2007b). 1,4-Cineole (131) is metabolized to 2-hydroxy- (132), 3-hydroxy- (133), 8-hydroxy-<br />
(134), <strong>and</strong> 9-hydroxy-1,4-cineole (135). Compound 132 is also eaterified to malonyl ester<br />
(136) as well as 125 (Miyazawa et al., 1995b). Terpinen-4-ol (342) is metabolized to 2-hydroxy-1,4-<br />
cineole (132), 2-hydroxy- (372) <strong>and</strong> 7-hydroxyterpinene-4-ol (342), <strong>and</strong> p-mentane-1,2,4-triol (371)<br />
(Abraham et al., 1986; Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 2007a; Kumagae <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 1999). Phell<strong>and</strong>rene<br />
(62) is metabolized to carvotanacetol (46) <strong>and</strong> phell<strong>and</strong>rol (63). Carvotanacetol (46) is further<br />
metabolized through the metabolism <strong>of</strong> carvotanacetone (47). Phel<strong>and</strong>rol (63) is also metabolized<br />
to give phell<strong>and</strong>ral (64), phell<strong>and</strong>ric acid (65), <strong>and</strong> 7-hydroxy-p-menthane (66). Phell<strong>and</strong>ric acid<br />
(65) is completely degradated to carbon dioxide <strong>and</strong> water as shown in Figure 14.202.<br />
Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> myrcene (302) <strong>and</strong> citronellene (309) by microorganisms <strong>and</strong> insects are<br />
summarized in Figure 14.205. b-Myrcene (302) was metabolized with Diplodia gossypina ATCC<br />
10936 (Abragam et al., 1985) to the diol (303) <strong>and</strong> a side-product (304). b-Myrcene (302) was<br />
metabolized with Ganoderma applanatum, Pleurotus fl abellatus, <strong>and</strong> Pleurotus sajor-caju to<br />
myrcenol (305) (2-methyl-6-methylene-7-octen-2-ol) <strong>and</strong> 306 (Busmann <strong>and</strong> Berger, 1994).<br />
b-Myrcene (302) was converted by common cutworm larvae, Spodoptera litura, to give<br />
myrcene-3, (10)-glycol (308) via myrcene-3,(10)-epoxide (307) (Miyazawa et al., 1998). Citronellene<br />
(309) was metabolized by cutworm Spodoptera litura to give 3,7-dimethyl-6-octene-1,2-diol (310)<br />
(Takechi <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 2005). Myrcene (302) is metabolized to two kinds <strong>of</strong> diols (303 <strong>and</strong> 304),<br />
myrcenol (305), <strong>and</strong> ocimene (306) (Seubert <strong>and</strong> Fass, 1964; Abraham et al., 1985). Citronellene<br />
(309) was metabolized to (310) by Spodoptera litura (Takeuchi <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 2005).<br />
Metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> nopol (452) <strong>and</strong> nopol benzyl ether (455) by microorganisms are summarized<br />
in Figure 14.206. Nopol (452) is metabolized mainly to 7-hydroxyethyl-a-terpineol (453)<br />
by rearrangement reaction <strong>and</strong> 3-oxoverbenone (454) as minor metabolite by Aspergillus spp.<br />
including Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 2006b,c). Myrtenol (5) is also metabolized<br />
to oleoropeic alcohol (204) by rearrangement reaction. However, nopol benzyl ether (455) was<br />
easily metabolized to 3-oxoverbenone (454) <strong>and</strong> 3-oxonopol-2¢,4¢-dihydroxybenzylether (456) as<br />
main metabolites without rearrangement reaction (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa 2006c).<br />
14.5.2 MICROBIAL TRANSFORMATION OF TERPENOIDS AS UNIT REACTION<br />
Microbiological oxidation <strong>and</strong> reduction patterns <strong>of</strong> terpenoids <strong>and</strong> related compounds by fungi<br />
belonging to Aspergillus spp. containing Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2 <strong>and</strong> Euglena gracilis Z are<br />
summarized in Tables 14.18 <strong>and</strong> 14.19, respectively. Dehydrogenation <strong>of</strong> secondary alcohols to<br />
ketones, hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> both nonallylic <strong>and</strong> allylic carbons, oxidation <strong>of</strong> olefins to form diols <strong>and</strong><br />
triols via epoxides, reduction <strong>of</strong> both saturated <strong>and</strong> a,b-unsaturated ketones <strong>and</strong> hydrogenation <strong>of</strong><br />
olefin conjugated with the carbonyl group were the characteristic features in the biotransformation<br />
<strong>of</strong> terpenoids <strong>and</strong> related compounds by Aspergillus spp.<br />
Compound names: 1, b-pinene; 2, pinocarveol; 3, pinocarvone; 4, a-pinene; 5, myrtenol; 6,<br />
myrtenal; 7, myrtenoic acid; 8, myrtanol; 9, 3-hydroxymyrtenol; 10, 4-hydroxymyrtanol; 11,<br />
a-fenchol; 12, fenchone; 13, 6-hydroxyfenchone; 14, 5-hydroxyfenchone; 15, 5-ox<strong>of</strong>enchone; 16,
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 721<br />
TABLE 14.18<br />
Microbiological Oxidation <strong>and</strong> Reduction Patterns <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by<br />
Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2<br />
Microbiological Oxidation<br />
Oxidation <strong>of</strong> alcohols<br />
Oxidation <strong>of</strong> primary alcohols to<br />
aldehydes <strong>and</strong> acids<br />
Oxidation <strong>of</strong> secondary alcohols to<br />
ketones<br />
(-)-trans-Carveol (81a¢), (+)-transcarveol<br />
(81a),<br />
(-)-cis-carveol (81b¢),<br />
(+)-cis-carveol (81b), 2a-hydroxy-1,8-<br />
cineole (125b), 3a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole<br />
(123b), 3b-hydroxy-1,8-cineole (123a)<br />
Oxidation <strong>of</strong> aldehydes to acids<br />
Hydroxylation Hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> nonallylic carbon (-)-Isodihydrocarvone (101c¢),<br />
(-)-carvotanacetone (47¢),<br />
(+)-carvotanacetone (47), cis-pmenthane<br />
(252), 1a-hydroxy-pmenthane<br />
(253), 1,8-cineole (122),<br />
1,4-cineole (131), (+)-fenchone (12),<br />
(-)-fenchone (12¢), (-)-menthol (137b¢),<br />
(+)-Menthol (137b), (-)-neomenthol<br />
(137a), (+)-neomenthol (137a),<br />
(+)-isomenthol (137c)<br />
Hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> allylic carbon (-)-Isodihydrocarvone (101b),<br />
(+)-neodihydrocarveol (102a¢),<br />
(-)-dihydrocarveol (102b¢),<br />
(+)-dihydrocarveol (102b), (+)-limonene<br />
(68), (-)-limonene (68¢)<br />
Oxidation <strong>of</strong> olefins<br />
Formation <strong>of</strong> epoxides <strong>and</strong> oxides<br />
Formation <strong>of</strong> diols<br />
(+)-Neodihydrocarveol (102a¢),<br />
(+)-dihydrocarveol (102b),<br />
(-)-dihydrocarveol (102b¢),<br />
(+)-limonene (68), (-)-limonene (68¢)<br />
Lactonization<br />
Formation <strong>of</strong> triols<br />
Microbiological Reduction<br />
(+)-Neodihydrocarveol (102a¢)<br />
Reduction <strong>of</strong> aldehydes to alcohols<br />
Reduction <strong>of</strong> ketones to alcohols Reduction <strong>of</strong> saturated ketones (+)-Dihydrocarvone (101a¢),<br />
(-)-isodihydrocarvone (101b),<br />
(+)-carvomenthone (48a¢),<br />
(-)-isocarvomenthone (48b)<br />
Hydrogenation <strong>of</strong> olefins<br />
Reduction <strong>of</strong> a,b-unsaturated ketones<br />
Hydrogenation <strong>of</strong> olefin conjugated with<br />
carbonyl group<br />
Hydrogenation <strong>of</strong> olefin not conjugated<br />
with a carbonyl group<br />
(-)-Carvone (93¢), (+)-carvone (93),<br />
(-)-carvotanacetone (47¢),<br />
(+)-carvotanacetone (47)
722 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 14.19<br />
Microbiological Oxidation, Reduction, <strong>and</strong> Another Reaction Patterns <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids<br />
by Euglena gracilis Z<br />
Oxidation <strong>of</strong> alcohols<br />
Oxidation <strong>of</strong> aldehydes to<br />
acids<br />
Hydroxylation<br />
Oxidation <strong>of</strong> primary alcohols to<br />
aldehydes <strong>and</strong> acids<br />
Oxidation <strong>of</strong> secondary alcohols<br />
to ketones<br />
Microbiological Oxidation<br />
(-)-trans-Carveol (81a¢), (+)-cis-carveol (81b),<br />
(+)-isoborneol (36b)<br />
*Diastereo- <strong>and</strong> enantioselective dehydrogenation is<br />
observed in carveol, borneol, <strong>and</strong> isoborneol<br />
Myrtenal (6), myrtanal, (-)-perillaldehyde (78),<br />
trans- <strong>and</strong> cis-1,2-dihydroperillaldehydes (261a <strong>and</strong><br />
261b), (-)-phell<strong>and</strong>ral (64), trans- <strong>and</strong> cistetrahydroperillaldehydes,<br />
cuminaldehyde (193),<br />
(+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-citronellal (261 <strong>and</strong> 261¢)<br />
*Acids were obtained as minor products<br />
Hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> nonallylic carbon<br />
Hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> allylic carbon (+)-Limonene (68), (-)-limonene (68¢)<br />
Oxidation <strong>of</strong> olefins<br />
Lactonization<br />
Formation <strong>of</strong> epoxides <strong>and</strong> oxides<br />
Formation <strong>of</strong> diols<br />
Formation <strong>of</strong> triols<br />
(+)-<strong>and</strong> (-)-Neodihydrocarveol (102a¢ <strong>and</strong> a), (-)- <strong>and</strong><br />
(+)-dihydrocarveol (102b¢ <strong>and</strong> b), (+)- <strong>and</strong><br />
(-)-isodihydrocarveol (102c¢ <strong>and</strong> c), (+)- <strong>and</strong><br />
(-)-neoisodihydrocarveol (102d¢ <strong>and</strong> d)<br />
Microbiological Reduction<br />
Reduction <strong>of</strong> aldehydes<br />
to alcohols<br />
Reduction <strong>of</strong> ketones to<br />
alcohols<br />
Hydrogenation <strong>of</strong> olefins<br />
Reduction <strong>of</strong> terpene aldehydes to<br />
terpene alcohols<br />
Reduction <strong>of</strong> aromatic <strong>and</strong> related<br />
aldehydes to alcohols<br />
Reduction <strong>of</strong> aliphatic aldehydes<br />
to alcohols<br />
Reduction <strong>of</strong> saturated ketones<br />
Reduction <strong>of</strong> a,b-unsaturated ketones<br />
Hydrogenation <strong>of</strong> olefin conjugated<br />
with carbonyl group<br />
Hydrogenation <strong>of</strong> olefin not<br />
conjugated with a carbonyl group<br />
Myrtenal (6), myrtanal, (-)-perillaldehyde (78),<br />
trans- <strong>and</strong> cis-1,2-dihydroperillaldehydes (261a <strong>and</strong><br />
261b), phell<strong>and</strong>ral (64), trans- <strong>and</strong> cis-1,2-<br />
dihydroperillaldehydes (261a <strong>and</strong> 261b), trans- <strong>and</strong><br />
cis-tetrahydroperillaldehydes, cuminaldehyde (193),<br />
citral (275 <strong>and</strong> 276), (+)- (261) <strong>and</strong> (-)-citronellal (261¢)<br />
(+)-Dihydrocarvone (101a¢), (-)-isodihydrocarvone<br />
(101b), (+)-carvomenthone (48a¢),<br />
(-)-isocarvomenthone (48b), (+)-dihydrocarvone-8,9-<br />
epoxides (97a¢), (+)-isodihydrocarvone-8,9-epoxides<br />
(97b¢), (-)-dihydrocarvone-8,9-epoxides (97a)<br />
(-)-Carvone (93¢), (+)-carvone (93), (-)-carvotanacetone<br />
(47¢), (+)-carvotanacetone (47), (-)-carvone-8,9-<br />
epoxides (96¢), (+)-carvone-8,9-epoxides (96)<br />
continued
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 723<br />
TABLE 14.19 (continued)<br />
Microbiological Oxidation, Reduction, <strong>and</strong> Another Reaction Patterns <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids<br />
by Euglena gracilis Z<br />
Hydrolysis<br />
Hydrolysis Hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> ester (+)-trans- <strong>and</strong> cis-Carveyl acetates (108a <strong>and</strong> b),<br />
(-)-cis-carveyl acetate (108b¢), (-)-cis-carveyl<br />
propionate, geranyl acetate (270)<br />
Hydration<br />
Hydration <strong>of</strong> C=C bond in<br />
isopropenyl group to tertiary<br />
alcohol<br />
Hydration<br />
(+)-Neodihydrocarveol (102a¢), (-)-dihydrocarveol<br />
(102b¢), (+)-isodihydrocarveol (102c¢),<br />
(+)-neoisodihydrocarveol (102d¢)<br />
(-)-neodihydrocarveol (102a), (+)-dihydrocarveol<br />
(102b), (-)-isodihydrocarveol (102c),<br />
(-)-neoisodihydrocarveol (102d), trans- <strong>and</strong><br />
cis-shisools (75a <strong>and</strong> 75b)<br />
Isomerization<br />
Isomerization Geraniol (271), nerol (272)<br />
9-hydroxyfenchone; 17, fenchone-9-al; 18, fenchone-9-oic acid; 19, fenchoquinone; 20, 2-hydroxyfenchone;<br />
21, 2,3-fencholide; 22, 1,2-fencholide; 23, verbenol; 24, verbenone; 25, 7-hydroxyverbenone;<br />
26, 7-hydroxyverbenone; 27, verbanone-4-al; 28, thujone; 29, thujoyl alcohol; 30,<br />
1-hydroxythujone; 31, 1,3-dihydroxythujone; 32, pinyl cation; 33, 1-p-menthene-8-cation; 34, a-terpineol;<br />
35, bornyl cation; 36, borneol; 37, camphor; 38, a-pinene epoxide; 39, isonovalal; 40, novalal;<br />
41, 2-hydroxypinyl cation; 42, 6-hydroxy-1-p-menthene-8-cation; 43, trans-sobrerol; 44,<br />
8-hydroxycarvotanacetone; (carvonehydrate); 45, 8-hydraocarvomenthone; 46, 1-p-menthen-2-ol;<br />
47, carvotanacetone; 48, carvomenthone; 49, carvomenthol; 50, 8-hydroxycarvomenthol; 51, 5-hydroxycarvotanacetone;<br />
52, 5-hydroxycarvomenthone; 53, 1-hydroxycarvomenthone; 54, p-menthane-1,2-diol;<br />
55, p-menthane-2,9-diol; 56, 2,3-lactone; 57, diepoxide; 58, 8,9-epoxy-1-p-menthanol;<br />
59, 1-p-menthene-4-cation; 60, terpine hydrate; 61, oleuropeic acid (8-hydroxyperillic acid); 62,<br />
1-p-menthene; 63, phell<strong>and</strong>rol; 64, phell<strong>and</strong>ral; 65, phell<strong>and</strong>ric acid; 66, 7-hydroxy-p-menthane; 67,<br />
2-(4-methyl-3-cyclohexenylidene)-propionic acid; 68, limonene; 69, limonene-1,2-epoxide; 70, 1-pmenthene-9-oic<br />
acid; 71, limonene-1,2-diol; 72, 1-hydroxy-8-p-menthene-2-one; 73, 1-hydroxy-pmenth-2,8-diene;<br />
74, perillyl alcohol; 75, shisool; 76, shisool-8,9-epoxide; 77, perillyl<br />
alcohol-8,9-epoxide; 78, perill<strong>and</strong>ehyde; 79, 1-p-menthene-8,9-diol; 80, 4-hydroxy-p-menth-1,8-<br />
diene (4-terpineol); 81, carveol; 82, perillic acid; 83, 4,9-dihydroxy-1-p-menthene-7-oic acid; 84,<br />
2-hydroxy-8-p-menthen-7-oic acid; 85, 2-oxo-8-p-menthen-7-oic acid; 86, b-isopropyl pimelic acid;<br />
87, isopropenylglutaric acid; 88, isobutenoic acid; 89, isobutyric acid; 90, 1-p-menthene-8,9-diol;<br />
91, carveol-8,9-epoxide; 92, bottrospicatol; 93, carvone; 94, 5-hydroxycarveol; 95, 1-p-menthene-<br />
6,9-diol; 96, carvone-8,9-epoxide; 97, dihydrocarvone-8,9-epoxide; 98, 5-hydroxycarvone; 99,<br />
5-hydroxydihydrocarvone; 100, 5-hydroxydihydrocarveol; 101, dihydrocarvone; 102, dihydrocarveol;<br />
103, dihydrocarveol-8,9-epoxide; 104, p-menthane-2,8,9-triol; 105, dihydrobottrospicatol;<br />
106, 10-hydroxydihydrocarvone; 107, 10-hydroxydihydrocarveol; 108, carveyl acetate <strong>and</strong> carveyl<br />
propionate; 109, 8,9-epoxydihydrocarveyl acetate; 110, isopiperitenol; 111, isopiperitenone; 112,<br />
piperitenone; 113, 7-hydroxyisopiperitenone; 114, 10-hydroxyisopiperitenone; 115, 4-hydroxyisopiperitenone;<br />
116, 5-hydroxyisopiperitenone; 117, 5-hydroxypiperitenone; 118, 7-hydroxypiperitenone;<br />
119, pulegone; 120, 8,9-dehydromenthenone; 121, 8-hydroxymenthenone; 122, 1,8-cineole; 123,<br />
3-hydroxy1,8-cineole; 124, 3-oxo-1,8-cineole; 125, 2-hydroxy-1,8-cineole; 126, 2-oxo-1,8-cineole;
724 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
127, 9-hydroxy-1,8-cineole; 128, lactone (R)-5,5-dimethyl-4-(3¢-oxobutyl)-4,5-dihydr<strong>of</strong>uran-<br />
2-(3H)-one; 129, p-hydroxytoluene; 130, 1,8-cineole-2-malonyl ester; 131, 1,4-cineole; 132,<br />
2-hydroxy-1,4-cineole; 133, 3-hydroxy-1,4-cineole; 134, 8-hydroxy-1,4-cineole; 135, 9-hydroxy-1,<br />
4-cineole; 136, 1,4-cineole-2-malonyl ester; 137, menthol; 138, 1-hydroxymenthol; 139, 6-hydroxymenthol;<br />
140, 2-hydroxymenthol; 141, 4-hydroxymenthol; 142, 8-hydroxymenthol; 143, 7-hydroxymenthol;<br />
144, 9-hydroxymenthol; 145, 7,8-dihydroxymenthol; 146, 1,8-dihydroxymenthol; 147,<br />
3-p-menthene; 148, menthenone; 149, menthone; 150, 1-hydroxymenthone; 151, 7-hydroxymenthone;<br />
152, 3,7-dimethyl-6-hydroxyoctanoic acid; 153, 3,7-dimethyl-6-oxoactanoic acid; 154,<br />
2-methyl-2,5-oxidoheptenoic acid; 155, menthone-1,2-diol; 156, piperitone; 157, 8-hydroxypiperitone;<br />
158, 6-hydroxypiperitone; 159, 9-hydroxypiperitone; 160, piperitone-7-al; 161, 7-hydroxypiperitone;<br />
162, piperitone-7-oic acid; 163, menthone-7-al; 164, menthone-7-oic acid; 165,<br />
7-carboxylmenthol; 166, piperitone oxide; 167, 4-hydroxypiperitone; 168, piperitenone oxide; 169,<br />
1-hydroxypulegone; 170, 2,3-seco-p-menthylacetone-3-en-1-ol; 171, 2-methyl-5-isopropyl-2,5-<br />
hexadienoic acid; 172, 2,5,6-trimethyl-2,4-heptadienoic acid; 173, 2,5,6-trimethyl-3-heptenoic acid;<br />
174, 2,5,6-trimethyl-2-heptenoic acid; 175, 3-hydroxy-2,5,6-trimethyl-3-heptanoic acid; 176, 3-oxo-<br />
2,5,6-trimethyl-3-heptanoic acid; 177, 3,4-dimethylvaleric acid; 178, p-cymene; 179, thymol;<br />
180, 6-hydroxythymol 181, 6-hydroxymenthenone, 6-hydroxy-4-p-menthen-3-one; 182, 3-hydroxythymo1,4-quinol;<br />
183, 2-hydroxythymoquionone; 184, 2,4-dimethyl-6-oxo-3,7-dimethyl-2,4-octadienoic<br />
acid; 185, 2,4,6-trioxo-3,7-dimethyl octanoic acid; 186, 2-oxobutanoic acid; 187, acetic acid;<br />
188, 8-hydroxy-p-cymene; 189, 9-hydroxy-p-cymene; 190, 2-(4-methylphenyl)-propanoic acid; 191,<br />
carvacrol; 192, cumin alcohol; 193, p-cumin aldehyde; 194, cumic acid; 195, cis-2,3-dihydroxy-2,<br />
3-dihydro-p-cumic acid; 196, 3-hydroxycumic acid; 197, 2,3-dihydroxy-p-cumic acid; 198,<br />
2-hydroxy-6-oxo-7-methyl-2,4-octadien-1,3-dioic acid; 199, 2-methyl-6-hydroxy-6-carboxy-7-<br />
octene; 201, 4-methyl-2-oxopentanoic acid; 202, carvacrol methyl ether; 203, 7-hydroxycarvacrol<br />
methyl ether; 204, 8-hydroxyperillyl alcohol; 205, 8-hydroxyperillaldehyde; 206, linalool; 207,<br />
linalyl-6-cation; 208, linalyl-8-cation; 209, 6-hydroxymethyl linalool; 210, linalool-6-al; 211,<br />
2-methyl-6-hydroxy-6-carboxy-2,7-octadiene; 212, 2-methyl-6-hydroxy-7-octen-6-oic acid; 213,<br />
phell<strong>and</strong>ric acid-8-cation; 214, 2,3-epoxylinalool; 215, 5-methyl-5-vinyltetrahydro-2-furanol; 216,<br />
5-methyl-5-vinyltetrahydro-2-furanone; 217, 2,2,6-trimethyl-3-hydroxy-6-vinyltetrahydropyrane;<br />
218, malonyl ester; 219, 1-hydroxylinalool (3,7-dimethyl-1,6-octadiene-8-ol); 220, 2,6-dimethyl-<br />
6-hydroxy-trans-2,7-octadienoic acid; 221, 4-methyl-trans-3,5-hexadienoic acid; 222, 4-methyltrans-3,5-hexadienoic<br />
acid; 223, 4-methyl-trans-2-hexenoic acid; 224, isobutyric acid; 225,<br />
9-hydroxycamphor; 226, bornyl acetate; 228, 6-hydroxycamphor; 229, 6-oxocamphor; 230,<br />
4-carboxymethyl-2,3,3-trimethylcyclopentanone; 231, 4-carboxymethyl-3,5,5-trimethyltetrahydro-<br />
2-pyrone; 232, isohydroxycamphoric acid; 233, isoketocamphoric acid; 234, 3,4,4-trimethyl-5-oxotrans-2-hexenoic<br />
acid; 235, 5-hydroxycamphor; 236, 5-oxocamphor; 237, 238, 6-hydroxy-1, 2-campholide;<br />
239, 6-oxo-1,2-campholide; 240, 5-carboxymethyl-3,4,4-trimethyl-2-cyclopentenone; 241, 6-carboxymethyl-4,5,5-trimethyl-5,6-dihydro-2-pyrone;<br />
242, 5-hydroxy-3,4,4-trimethyl-2-heptene-1,7-<br />
dioic acid; 243, 3-hydroxycamphor; 244, camphorquinone; 245, 2-hydroxyepicamphor; 246,<br />
2-hydroxy-p-menthan-7-oic acid; 247, 2-oxo-p-menthan-7-oic acid; 248, 3-isopropylheptane-1,7-<br />
dioic acid; 249, 3-isopropylpentane-1,5-dioic acid; 250, 4-methyl-3-oxopentanoic acid; 251, methylisopropyl<br />
ketone; 252, p-menthane; 253, 1-hydroxy-p-menthane; 254, p-menthane-1,9-diol; 255,<br />
p-menthane-1,7-diol; 256, 1-hydroxy-p-menthene-7-al; 257, 1-hydroxy-p-menthene-7-oic acid; 258,<br />
citronellol; 259, dihydrocitronellol; 260, 2,8-dihydroxy-2,6-dimethyl octane; 261, citronellal; 262,<br />
citronellic acid; 263, pulegol; 264, 7-hydroyxmethyl-6-octene-3-ol; 265, 3,7-dimethyl-6-octane-1,8-<br />
diol; 266, 3,7-dimethyloctane-1,8-diol; 267, isopulegol; 268, 6,7-epoxycitronellol; 269, citronellyl<br />
acetate; 270, geranyl acetate; 271, geraniol; 272, nerol 273, nerol-6,7-epoxide; 274, 6,7-epoxygeraniol;<br />
275, neral; 276, geranial; 277, neric acid; 278, geranic acid; 279, 2,6-dimethyl-8-hydroxy-7-oxo-<br />
2-octene; 280, 6-methyl-5-heptenoic acid; 281, 7-methyl-3-carboxymethyl-2,6-octadiene-1-oic acid;<br />
282, 7-methyl-3-hydroxy-3-carboxymethyl-6-octen-1-oic acid; 283, 7-methyl-3-oxo-6-octenoic<br />
acid; 284, 6-methyl-5-heptenoic acid; 284, 4-methyl-3-heptenoic acid; 285, 4-methyl-3-pentenoic<br />
acid; 286, 3-methyl-2-butenoic acid; 287, 3-hydroxymethyl-2,6-octadiene-1-ol; 288, 3-formyl-2,6-
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 725<br />
octadiene-1-ol; 289, 3-carboxy-2,6-octadiene-1-ol; 290, 3-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)-3-butenolide; 291,<br />
7-hydroxymethyl-3-methyl-2,6-octadien-1-ol; 292, 3,7-dimethyl-2,3-dihydroxy-6-octen-1-ol; 293,<br />
3,7-dimethyl-2-oxo-6-octene-1,3-diol; 294, 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one; 295, 6-methyl-7-hydroxy-5-<br />
heptene-2-one; 296, 2-methyl-g-butyrolactone; 297, 6-methyl-5-heptenoic acid; 298, 6-methyl-5-<br />
hepten-2-ol; 299, 7-methyl-3-oxo-6-octanoic acid; 300, 3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadiene-1,8-diol; 301,<br />
isopulegyl acetate; 302, myrcene; 303, 2-methyl-6-methylene-7-octene-2,3-diol; 304, 6-methylene-<br />
7-octene-2,3-diol; 305, myrcenol; 306, ocimene; 307, myrcene-3,(10)-epoxide; 308, myrcene-3,(10)-<br />
glycol; 309, (-)-citronellene; 309¢, (+)-citronellene; 310, (3R)-3,7-dimethyl-6-octene-1,2-diol; 310¢,<br />
(3S)-3,7-dimethyl-6-octene-1,2-diol; 311, (E)-3,7-dimethyl-5-octene-1,7-diol; 312, trans-rose oxide;<br />
313, cis-rose oxide; 314, (2Z,5E)-3,7-dimethyl-2,5-octadiene-1,7-diol; 315, (Z)-3,7-dimethyl-2,7-<br />
octadiene-1,6-diol; 316, (2E,6Z)-2,6-dimethyl-2,6-octadiene-1,8-diol; 317, a cyclization product; 318,<br />
(2E,5E)-3,7-dimethyl-2,5-octadiene-1,7-diol; 319, (E)-3,7-dimethyl-2,7-octadiene-1,6-diol; 320,<br />
8-hydroxynerol; 321, 10-hydroxynerol; 322, 1-hydroxy-3,7-dimethyl-2E,6E-octadienal; 323, 1-hydroxy-<br />
3,7-dimethyl-2E,6E-octadienoic acid; 324, 3,9-epoxy-p-menth-1-ene; 325, tetrahydrolinalool; 326,<br />
3,7-dimethyloctane-3,5-diol; 327, 3,7-dimethyloctane-3,7-diol; 328, 3,7-dimethyl-octane-3,8-diol;<br />
329, dihydromyrcenol; 330, 1,2-epoxydihydromyrcenol; 331, 3b-hydroxydihydromyrcerol; 332,<br />
dihydromyrcenyl acetate; 333, 1,2-dihydroxydihydromyrcenyl acetate; 334, (+)-p-menthane-1-<br />
b,2a,8-triol; 335, a-pinene-1,2-epoxide; 336, 3-carene; 337, 3-carene-1,2-epoxide; 338, (1R)-<br />
trans-isolimonene; 338, (1R,4R)-p-menth-2-ene-8,9-diol; 339, (1R,4R)-p-menth-2-ene-8,9-diol;<br />
340, a-Terpinene; 341, a-terpinene-7-oic acid; 342, (-)-terpinen-4-ol; 343, p-menthane-1,2,4-triol;<br />
344, g-terpinene; 345, g-terpinene-7-oic acid; 346, terpinolene; 347, (1R)-8-hydroxy-3-p-menthen-<br />
2-one; 348, (1R)-1,8-dihydroxy-3-p-menthen-2-one; 349, 6b-hydroxyfenchol; 350, 5b-hydroxyfenchol<br />
(a,5b,b,5a); 351, terpinolene-1,2-trans-diol; 352, terpinolene-4,8-diol; 353, terpinolene-9-ol;<br />
354, terpinolene-10-ol; 355, a-phell<strong>and</strong>rene; 356, a-phell<strong>and</strong>rene-7-oic acid; 357, terpinolene-7-oic<br />
acid; 358, thymoquinone; 359, 1,2-dihydroperillaldehyde; 360, 1,2-dihydroperillic acid; 361, 8-hydroxy-1,2-dihydroperillyl<br />
alcohol; 362, tetrahydroperillaldehyde (a trans, b cis); 363, tetrahydroperillic<br />
acid (a trans, b cis); 364, (-)-menthol monoglucoside; 365, (+)-menthol diglucoside; 366,<br />
(+)-isopulegol; 367, 7-hydroxy-(+)-isopulegol; 368, 10-hydroxy-(+)-isopulegol; 369, 1,2-epoxy-aterpineol;<br />
370, bornane-2,8-diol; 371, p-menthane-1a,2b,4b-triol; 372, 1-p-menthene-4b,6-diol;<br />
373, 1-p-menthene-4a,7-diol; 374, (+)-bottrospicatal; 375, 1-p-menthene-2b,8,9-triol; 376, (-)-perillyl<br />
alcohol monoglucoside; 377, (-)-perillyl alcohol diglucoside; 378, 4a-hydroxy-(-)-isodihydrocarvone;<br />
379, 2-methyl-2-cyclohexenone; 380, 2-cyclohexenone; 381, 3-methyl-2-cyclohexenone;<br />
382, 2-methylcyclohexanone; 383, 2-methylcyclohexanol (a, trans b, cis); 384, 4-hydroxycarvone;<br />
385, 2-ethyl-2-cyclohexenone; 386, 2-ethylcyclohexenone (a1R) (b1S); 387, 1-hydroxypulegone;<br />
388, 5-hydroxypulegone; 389, 8-hydroxymenthone; 390, 10-hydroxy-(-)-carvone; 391, 1,5,5-trimethylcyclopentane-1,4-dicarboxylic<br />
acid; 392, 4b-hydroxy-(-)-menthone; 393, 1a,4b-dihydroxy-(-)-<br />
menthone; 394, 7-hydroxy-9-carboxymenthone; 395, 7-hydroxy-1,8-cineole; 396, methyl ester<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole; 397, ethyl ester <strong>of</strong> 2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole; 398, n-propyl ester <strong>of</strong> 2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole;<br />
399, n-butyl ester <strong>of</strong> 2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole; 400, isopropyl ester <strong>of</strong> 2a-hydroxy-<br />
1,8-cineole; 401, tertiary butyl ester <strong>of</strong> 2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole; 402, methylisopropyl ester <strong>of</strong><br />
2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole; 403, methyl tertiary butyl ester <strong>of</strong> 2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole; 404, 2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole<br />
monoglucoside (404 <strong>and</strong> 404’); 405, 2a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole diglucoside; 406,<br />
p-menthane-1,4-diol; 407, 1-p-menthene-4b,6-diol; 408, (-)-pinane-2a,3a-diol; 409, (-)-6b-hydroxypinene;<br />
410, (-)-4a,5-dihydroxypinene; 411, (-)-4a-hydroxypinen-6-one; 412, 6b,7-dihydroxyfenchol;<br />
413, 3-oxo-pinane; 414, 2a-hydroxy-3-pinanone; 415, 2a, 5-dihydroxy-3-pinanone;<br />
416, 2a,10-dihydroxy-3-pinanone; 417, trans-3-pinanol; 418, pinane-2a,3a-diol; 419, pinane-2a,<br />
3a, 5-triol; 420, isopinocampheol (3-pinanol); 421, pinane-1,3a-diol; 422, pinane-3a,5-diol; 423,<br />
pinane-3b,9-diol; 424, pinane-3b,4b,-diol; 425, 426, pinane-3a,4b-diol; 427, pinane-3a,9-diol;<br />
428, pinane-3a,6-diol; 429, p-menthane-2a,9-diol; 430, 2-methyl-3a-hydroxy-1-hydroxyisopropyl<br />
cyclohexane propane; 431, 5-hydroxy-3-pinanone; 432, 2a-methyl,3-(2-methyl-2-hydroxypropyl)-<br />
cyclopenta-1b-ol; 433, 3-acetoxy-2a-pinanol; 434, 8-hydroxy-a-pinene;435, 436, myrtanoic acid;<br />
437, camphene; 438, camphene gylcol; 439, (+)-3-carene; 440, m-mentha-4,6-dien-8-ol; 441,
726 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
m-cymen-8-ol; 442, 3-carene-9-ol; 443, 3-carene-9-carboxylic acid; 444, 3-caren-10-ol-9-carboxylic<br />
acid; 445, 3-carene-9,10-dicarboxylic acid; 446, (-)-cis-carane; 447, dicarboxylic acid <strong>of</strong> (-)-ciscarane;<br />
448, (-)-6b-hydroxypinene; 449, (-)-4a,5-dihydroxypinene; 450, (-)-4a-hydroxypinen-6-<br />
one; 451, 10-hydroxyverbenol; 452, (-)-nopol; 453, 7-hydroxymethyl-1-p-menthen-8-ol; 454,<br />
3-oxo nopol; 455, nopol benzyl ether; 456, 4-oxonopl-2¢,4¢-dihydroxybenzyl ether; 457, 7-hydroxymethyl-1-p-menthen-8-ol<br />
benzyl ether; 458, piperitenol; 459, thymol methyl ether; 460, 7-hydroxythymol<br />
methyl ether; 461, 9-hydroxythymol methyl ether; 462, 1,8-cineol-9-oic acid; 463,<br />
4-hydroxyphell<strong>and</strong>ric acid; 464, 4-hydroxydihydrophell<strong>and</strong>ric acid; 465, (+)-8-hydroxyfenchol; 466,<br />
(-)-9-hydroxyfenchol; 467, (+)-10-hydroxyfenchol, 468, 4a-hydroxy-6-oxo-a-pinene; 469, dihydrolinalyl<br />
acetate; 470, 3-hydroxycarvacrol; 471, 9-hydroxycarvacrol; 472, carvacrol-9-oic acid; 473,<br />
8,9-dehydrocarvacrol; 474, 8-hydroxycarvacrol; 475, 7-hydroxycarvacrol; 476, carvacrol-7-oic acid;<br />
477, 8,9-dihydroxycarvacrol; 478, 7,9-dihydroxycarvacrol methyl ether; 479, 7-hydroxythymol; 480,<br />
9-hydroxythymol; 481, thymol-7-oic acid; 482, 7,9-dihydroxythymol; 483, thymol-9-oic acid; 484,<br />
(1R,2R,3S,4S,5R)-3,4-pinanediol.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Abraham, W.-R., H.-A. Arfmann, B. Stumpf, P. Washausen, <strong>and</strong> K. Kieslich, 1988. Microbial transformations<br />
<strong>of</strong> some terpenoids <strong>and</strong> natural compounds. In: Bi<strong>of</strong>l avour’87. Analysis—Biochemistry—Biotechnology,<br />
P. Schreier, ed., pp. 399–414. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter <strong>and</strong> Co.<br />
Abraham, W.-R., H.M.R. H<strong>of</strong>fmann, K. Kieslich, G. Reng, <strong>and</strong> B. Stumpf, 1985. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong><br />
some monoterpenes <strong>and</strong> sesquiterpenoids. In: Enzymes in Organic Synthesis, R. Porter <strong>and</strong> S. Clark, Ciba<br />
Foundation Symposium 111, pp. 146–160. London: Pitman Press.<br />
Abraham, W.-R., K. Kieslich, H. Reng, <strong>and</strong> B. Stumpf, 1984. Formation <strong>and</strong> production <strong>of</strong> 1,2-trans-glycols<br />
from various monoterpenes with 1-menthene skeleton by microbial transformations with Diplodia<br />
gossypina. In: 3rd European Congr. on Biotechnology, Vol. 1, pp. 245–248. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim.<br />
Abraham, W.-R., B. Stumpf, <strong>and</strong> H.-A. Arfmann, 1990. Chiral intermediates by microbial epoxidations.<br />
J. Essent. Oil Res., 2: 251–257.<br />
Abraham, W.-R., B. Stumpf, <strong>and</strong> K. Kieslich, 1986. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> terpenoids with 1-p-menthene<br />
skeleton. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 24: 24–30.<br />
Amsterdam, D. 1997. Susceptibility Testing <strong>of</strong> Antimicrobials in Liquid Media. In: Antibiotics in Laboratory<br />
Medicine, V. Lorian, ed., 4th ed. Maryl<strong>and</strong>, USA: Williams & Wilkins, Maple Press.<br />
Asakawa, Y., H. Takahashi, M. Toyota, Y. <strong>and</strong> Noma, 1991. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> monoterpenoids, (-)- <strong>and</strong><br />
(+)-menthols, terpionolene <strong>and</strong> carvotanacetone by Aspergillus species. Phytochemistry, 30: 3981–3987.<br />
Asakawa, Y., M. Toyota, T. Ishida, T. Takemoto, 1983. Metabolites in rabbit urine after terpenoid administration.<br />
Proc. 27th TEAC, pp. 254–256.<br />
Atta-ur-Rahman, M. Yaqoob, A. Farooq, S. Anjum, F. Asif, <strong>and</strong> M.I. Choudhary, 1998. Fungal transformation<br />
<strong>of</strong> (1R,2S,5R)-(−)-menthol by Cephalosporium aphidicola. J. Nat. Prod., 61: 1340–1342.<br />
Ausgulen, L.T., E. Solheim, <strong>and</strong> R.R. Scheline, 1987. Metabolism in rats <strong>of</strong> p-cymene derivatives: Carvacrol<br />
<strong>and</strong> thymol. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 61: 98–102.<br />
Babcka, J., J. Volf, J. Czchec, <strong>and</strong> P. Lebeda, 1956. Patent 56-9686b.<br />
Ballal, N.R., P.K. Bhattacharyya, <strong>and</strong> P.N. Rangachari, 1967. Microbiological transformation <strong>of</strong> terpenes. Part<br />
XIV. Purification <strong>and</strong> properties <strong>of</strong> perillyl alcohol dehydrogenase. Indian J. Biochem., 5:1–6.<br />
Bauer, K., D. Garbe, <strong>and</strong> H. Surburg (eds.), 1990. Common Fragrance <strong>and</strong> Flavor Materials: Preparation,<br />
Properties <strong>and</strong> Uses. 2nd revised ed., 218pp. New York: VCH Publishers.Best, D.J. <strong>and</strong> K.J. Davis, 1988.<br />
Soap, perfumery <strong>and</strong> Cosmetics 4: 47.<br />
Best, D.J., N.C. Floyd, A. Magalhaes, A. Burfield, <strong>and</strong> P.M. Rhodes, 1987. Initial enzymatic steps in the degradation<br />
<strong>of</strong> alpha-pinene by Pseudomonas fluorescens Ncimb 11671. Biocatal. Biotransform., 1: 147–159.<br />
Bhattacharyya, P.K. <strong>and</strong> K. Ganapathy, 1965. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> terpenes. VI. Studies on the mechanism<br />
<strong>of</strong> some fungal hydroxylation reactions with the aid <strong>of</strong> model systems. Indian J. Biochem., 2:<br />
137–145.<br />
Bhattacharyya, P.K., B.R. Prema, B.D. Kulkarni, <strong>and</strong> S.K. Pradhan, 1960. Microbiological transformation <strong>of</strong><br />
terpenes: Hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> a-pinene. Nature, 187: 689–690.<br />
Bock, G., I. Benda, <strong>and</strong> P. Schreier, 1986. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> linalool by Botrytis cinerea. J. Food Sci., 51:<br />
659–662.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 727<br />
Bock, G., I. Benda, <strong>and</strong> P. Schreier, 1988. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> geraniol <strong>and</strong> nerol by Botrytis cinerea.<br />
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 27: 351–357.<br />
Bouwmester, H.J., J.A.R. Davies, <strong>and</strong> H. Toxopeus, 1995. Enantiomeric composition <strong>of</strong> carvone, limonene, <strong>and</strong><br />
carveols in seeds <strong>of</strong> dill <strong>and</strong> annual <strong>and</strong> biennial caraway varieties. J. Agric. Food Chem., 43:<br />
3057–3064.<br />
Bowen, E.R., 1975. Potential by-products from microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> d-limonene, Proc. Fla. State<br />
Hortic. Soc., 88: 304–308.<br />
Bradshaw, W.H., H.E. Conrad, E.J. Corey, I.C. Gunsalus, <strong>and</strong> D. Lednicer, 1959. Microbiological degradation<br />
<strong>of</strong> (+)-camphor. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 81: 5507.<br />
Brit Patent, 1970, No. 1,187,320.<br />
Brunerie, P., I. Benda, G. Bock, <strong>and</strong> P. Schreier, 1987a. Bioconversion <strong>of</strong> citronellol by Botrytis cinerea. Appl.<br />
Microbiol. Biotechnol., 27: 6–10.<br />
Brunerie, P., I. Benda, G. Bock, <strong>and</strong> P. Schreier, 1987b. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> citral by Botrytis cinerea.<br />
Z. Naturforsch., 42C: 1097–1100.<br />
Brunerie, P., I. Benda, G. Bock, <strong>and</strong> P. Schreier, 1988. Bioconversion <strong>of</strong> monoterpene alcohols <strong>and</strong> citral by<br />
Botrytis cinerea. In: Bi<strong>of</strong>lavour’87. Analysis—Biochemistry—Biotechnology, P. Schreier, ed., pp. 435–444.<br />
Berlin: Walter de Gruyter <strong>and</strong> Co.<br />
Busmann, D. <strong>and</strong> R.G. Berger, 1994. Conversion <strong>of</strong> myrcene by submerged cultured basidiomycetes.<br />
J. Biotechol., 37: 39–43.<br />
Cadwall<strong>and</strong>er, K.R., R.J. Braddock, M.E. Parish, <strong>and</strong> D.P. Higgins, 1989. Bioconversion <strong>of</strong> (+)-limonene by<br />
Pseudomonas gladioli. J. Food Sci., 54: 1241–1245.<br />
Cadwallader, K.R. <strong>and</strong> R.J. Braddock, 1992. Enzymatic hydration <strong>of</strong> (4R)-(+)-limonene to (4R)-(+)-alphaterpineol.<br />
Dev. Food Sci., 29: 571–584.<br />
Cantwell, S.G., E.P. Lau, D.S. Watt, <strong>and</strong> R.R. Fall, 1978. Biodegradation <strong>of</strong> acyclic isoprenoids by Pseudomonas<br />
species. J. Bacteriol., 135: 324–333.<br />
Chamberlain, E.M. <strong>and</strong> S. Dagley, 1968. The metabolism <strong>of</strong> thymol by a Pseudomonas. Biochem. J., 110:<br />
755–763.<br />
Chapman, P.J., G. Meerman, <strong>and</strong> I.C. Gunsalus, 1965. The microbiological transformation <strong>of</strong> fenchone.<br />
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 20: 104–108.<br />
Chapman, P.J., G. Meerman, I.C. Gunsalus, R. Srinivasan, <strong>and</strong> K.L. Rinehart Jr., 1966. A new acyclic acid<br />
metabolite in camphor oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 88: 618–619.<br />
Christensen, M. <strong>and</strong> D.E. Tuthill, 1985. Aspergillus: An overview. In: Advances in Penicillium <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus<br />
Systematics, R.A. Samson <strong>and</strong> J.I. Pitt, eds, pp. 195–209. New York: Plenum Press.<br />
Conrad, H.E., R. DuBus, <strong>and</strong> I.C. Gunsalus, 1961. An enzyme system for cyclic ketone lactonization, Biochem.<br />
Biophys. Res. Commun., 6: 293–297.<br />
Conrad, H.E., R. DuBus, M.J. Mamtredt, <strong>and</strong> I.C. Gunsalus, 1965a. Mixed function oxidation II. Separation<br />
<strong>and</strong> properties <strong>of</strong> the enxymes catalyzing camphor ketolactonization. J. Biol. Chem., 240: 495–503.<br />
Conrad, H.E., K. Lieb, <strong>and</strong> I.C. Gunsalus, 1965b. Mixed function oxidation III. An electron transport complex<br />
in camphor ketolactonization. J. Biol. Chem., 240: 4029–4037.<br />
David, L. <strong>and</strong> H. Veschambre, 1984. Preparation d’oxydes de linalol par bioconversion. Tetrahadron Lett., 25:<br />
543–546.<br />
David, L. <strong>and</strong> H. Veschambre, 1985. Oxidative cyclization <strong>of</strong> linalol by various microorganisms. Agric. Biol.<br />
Chem., 49: 1487–1489.<br />
DeFrank, J.J. <strong>and</strong> D.W. Ribbons, 1977a. p-Cymene pathway in Pseudomonas putida: Initial reactions.<br />
J. Bacteriol., 129: 1356–1364.<br />
DeFrank, J.J. <strong>and</strong> D.W. Ribbons, 1977b. p-Cymene pathway in Pseudomonas putida: Ring cleavage <strong>of</strong> 2,3-dihydroxy-p-cumate<br />
<strong>and</strong> subsequent reactions. J. Bacteriol., 129: 1365–1374.<br />
Demirci, F., 2000. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> bioactive monoterpenes. Ph.D. thesis, pp. 1–137. Anadolu<br />
University, Eskisehir, Turkey.<br />
Demirci, F., H. Berber, <strong>and</strong> K.H.C. Baser, 2007. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> p-cymene to thymoquinone. Book <strong>of</strong><br />
Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 38th ISEO, SL-1, p. 6.<br />
Demirci, F., N. Kirimer, B. Demirci, Y. Noma, <strong>and</strong> K.H.C. Baser, 2001. The biotransformation <strong>of</strong> thymol<br />
methyl ether by different fungi. XII Biotechnology Congr., Book <strong>of</strong> abstracts, p. 47.<br />
Demirci, F., Y. Noma, N. Kirimer, <strong>and</strong> K.H.C. Baser, 2004. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> (–)-carvone.<br />
Z. Naturforsch., 59c: 389–392.<br />
Demyttenaere, J.C.R. <strong>and</strong> H.L. De Pooter, 1996. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> geraniol <strong>and</strong> nerol by spores <strong>of</strong><br />
Penicillium italicum. Phytochemistry, 41: 1079–1082.
728 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Demyttenaere, J.C.R. <strong>and</strong> H.L. De Pooter, 1998. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> citral <strong>and</strong> nerol by spores <strong>of</strong> Penicillium<br />
digitatum. Flav. Fragr. J., 13: 173–176.<br />
Demyttenaere, J.C.R., M. del Carmen Herrera, <strong>and</strong> N. De Kimpe, 2000. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> geraniol, nerol <strong>and</strong><br />
citral by sporulated surface cultures <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus niger <strong>and</strong> Penicillium sp. Phytochemistry, 55: 363–373.<br />
Demyttenaere, J.C.R., I.E.I. Koninckx, <strong>and</strong> A. Meersman, 1996. Microbial production <strong>of</strong> bi<strong>of</strong>lavours by fungal<br />
spores. In: Flavour <strong>Science</strong>. Recent Developments, A.J. Taylor <strong>and</strong> D.S. Mottram, eds, pp. 105–110.<br />
Cambridge, UK: The Royal Society <strong>of</strong> Chemistry.<br />
Demyttenaere, J.C.R. <strong>and</strong> H.M. Willemen, 1998. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> linalool to furanoid <strong>and</strong> pyranoid linalool<br />
oxides by Aspergillus niger. Phytochemistry, 47: 1029–1036.<br />
Dhavalikar, R.S. <strong>and</strong> P.K. Bhattacharyya, 1966. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> terpenes. Part VIII. Fermentation<br />
<strong>of</strong> limonene by a soil Pseudomonad. Indian J. Biochem., 3: 144–157.<br />
Dhavalikar, R.S., A. Ehbrecht, <strong>and</strong> G. Albroscheit, 1974. Microbial transformations <strong>of</strong> terpenoids: b-pinene.<br />
Dragoco Rep., 3: 47–49.<br />
Dhavalikar, R.S., P.N. Rangachari, <strong>and</strong> P.K. Bhattacharyya, 1966. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> terpenes. Part<br />
IX. Pathways <strong>of</strong> degradation <strong>of</strong> limonene in a soil Pseudomonad. Indian J. Biochem., 3: 158–164.<br />
Farooq, A., M.I. Choudhary, S. Tahara, T.-U. Rahman, K.H.C. Baser, <strong>and</strong> F. Demirci, 2002. The microbial<br />
oxidation <strong>of</strong> (-)-b-pinene by Botrytis cinerea. Z. Naturforsch., 57c: 686–690.<br />
Fenaroli, G., 1975. Synthetic flavors. In: Fenaroli’s <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> Flavor Ingredients, eds. T.E. Furia <strong>and</strong><br />
N. Bellanca eds, Vol. 2, pp. 6–563. Clevel<strong>and</strong>, OH: CRC Press.<br />
Flynn, T.M. <strong>and</strong> I.A. Southwell, 1979. 1,3-Dimethyl-2-oxabicyclo [2,2,2]-octane-3-methanol <strong>and</strong> 1,3-dimethyl-<br />
2-oxabicyclo[2,2,2]-octane- 3-carboxylic acid, urinary metabolites <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole. Aus. J. Chem., 32:<br />
2093–2095.<br />
Ganapathy, K. <strong>and</strong> P.K. Bhattacharyya, unpublished data.<br />
Gibbon, G.H., N.F. Millis, <strong>and</strong> S.J. Pirt, 1972. Degradation <strong>of</strong> a-pinene by bacteria. Proc. IV IFS, Ferment.<br />
Technol. Today, pp. 609–612.<br />
Gibbon, G.H. <strong>and</strong> S.J. Pirt, 1971. The degradation <strong>of</strong> a-pinene by Pseudomonas PX 1. FEBS Lett., 18: 103–105.<br />
Gondai, T., M. Shimoda, <strong>and</strong> T. Hirata, 1999. Asymmetric reduction <strong>of</strong> enone compounds by Chlorella miniata.<br />
Proc. 43rd TEAC, pp. 217–219.<br />
Griffiths, E.T., S.M. Bociek, P.C. Harries, R. Jeffcoat, D.J. Sissons, <strong>and</strong> P.W. Trudgill, 1987b. Bacterial metabolism<br />
<strong>of</strong> alpha-pinene: Pathway from alpha-pinene oxide to acyclic metabolites in Nocardia sp. strain<br />
P18.3. J. Bacteriol., 169: 4972–4979.<br />
Griffiths, E.T., P.C. Harries, R. Jeffcoat, <strong>and</strong> P.W. Trudgill, 1987a. Purification <strong>and</strong> properties <strong>of</strong> alpha-pinene<br />
oxide lyase from Nocardia sp. strain P18.3. J. Bacteriol., 169: 4980–4983.<br />
Gunsalus, I.C., P.J. Chapman, <strong>and</strong> J.-F. Kuo, 1965. Control <strong>of</strong> catabolic specificity <strong>and</strong> metabolism. Biochem.<br />
Biophys. Res. Commun., 18: 924–931.<br />
Gyoubu, K. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2005. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-fenchone by liver microsomes. Proc.<br />
49th TEAC, pp. 420–422.<br />
Gyoubu, K. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2006. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-camphor by liver microsome. Proc.<br />
50th TEAC, pp. 253–255.<br />
Hagiwara, Y. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2007. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> cineole by the larvae <strong>of</strong> common cutworm<br />
(Spodoptera litura) as a biocatalyst. Proc. 51st TEAC, pp. 304–305.<br />
Hagiwara, Y., H. Takeuchi, <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2006. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-<strong>and</strong> (-)-menthone by the larvae<br />
<strong>of</strong> common cutworm (Spodoptera litura) as a biocatalyst. Proc. 50th TEAC, pp. 279–280.<br />
Hamada, H. <strong>and</strong> T. Furuya, 2000. Hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> monoterpenes by plant suspension cells. Proc. 44th TEAC,<br />
pp. 167–168.<br />
Hamada, H., T. Furuya, <strong>and</strong> N. Nakajima, 1996. The hydroxylation <strong>and</strong> glycosylation by plant catalysts. Proc.<br />
40th TEAC, pp. 111–112.<br />
Hamada, H., T. Harada, <strong>and</strong> T. Furuya, 2001. Hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> monoterpenes by algae <strong>and</strong> plant suspension<br />
cells. Proc. 45th TEAC, pp. 366–368.<br />
Hamada, H., M. Kaji, T. Hirata, T. Furuya, 2003. Enantioselective biotransformation <strong>of</strong> monoterpenes by<br />
Cyanobacterium. Proc. 47th TEAC, pp. 162–163.<br />
Hamada, H., Y. Kondo, M. Kaji, <strong>and</strong> T. Furuta, 2002. Glycosylation <strong>of</strong> monoterpenes by plant suspension cells.<br />
Proc. 46th TEAC, pp. 321–322.<br />
Hamada, H., A. Matsumoto, <strong>and</strong> J. Takimura, 2004. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> acyclic monoterpenes by biocatalysts<br />
<strong>of</strong> plant cultured cells <strong>and</strong> Cyanobacterium. Proc. 48th TEAC, pp. 393–395.<br />
Hamada, H. <strong>and</strong> H. Yasumune, 1995. The hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> monoterpenoids by plant cell biotransformation.<br />
Proc. 39th TEAC, pp. 375–377.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 729<br />
Hartline, R.A. <strong>and</strong> I.C. Gunsalus, 1971. Induction specificity <strong>and</strong> catabolite repression <strong>of</strong> the early enzymes in<br />
camphor degradation by Pseudomonas putida. J. Bacteriol., 106: 468–478.<br />
Hashimoto Y. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2001. Microbial resolution <strong>of</strong> esters <strong>of</strong> racemic 2-endo-hydroxy-1,8-cineole<br />
by Glomerella cingulata. Proc. 45th TEAC, pp. 363–365.<br />
Hayashi, T., T. Kakimoto, H. Ueda, <strong>and</strong> C. Tatsumi, 1969. Microbiological conversion <strong>of</strong> terpenes. Part VI.<br />
Conversion <strong>of</strong> borneol. J. Agric. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 43: 583–587.<br />
Hayashi, T., H. Takashiba, S. Ogura, H. Ueda, <strong>and</strong> C. Tsutsumi, 1968. Nippon Nogei-Kagaku Kaishi, 42:<br />
190–196.<br />
Hayashi, T., H. Takashiba, H. Ueda, <strong>and</strong> C. Tsutsumi, 1967. Nippon Nogei Kagaku Kaishi, 41.254. no. 79878g.<br />
Hayashi, T., S. Uedono, <strong>and</strong> C. Tatsumi, 1972. Conversion <strong>of</strong> a-terpineol to 8,9-epoxy-p-menthan-1-ol. Agric.<br />
Biol. Chem., 36: 690–691.<br />
Hirata, T., K. Shimoda, <strong>and</strong> T. Gondai, 2000. Asymmetric hydrogenation <strong>of</strong> the C–C double bond <strong>of</strong> enones<br />
with the reductases from Nicotiana tabacum. Chem. Lett., 29: 850–851.<br />
Hosler, P., 1969. U.S. Patent 3,458,399.<br />
Hudlicky, T., D. Gonzales, <strong>and</strong> D.T. Gibson, 1999. Enzymatic dihydroxylation <strong>of</strong> aromatics in enantioselective<br />
synthesis: Exp<strong>and</strong>ing asymmetric methodology. Aldrichim. Acta, 32: 35–61.<br />
Hungund, B.L., P.K. Bhattachayya, <strong>and</strong> P.N. Rangachari, 1970. Methylisopropyl ketone from a terpene fermentation<br />
by the soil Pseudomonad, PL-strain. Indian J. Biochem., 7: 80–81.<br />
Ishida, T., Y. Asakawa, <strong>and</strong> T. Takemoto, T. Aratani, 1979. Terpenoid biotransformation in mammals. II.<br />
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> dl-camphene. J. Pharm. Sci., 68: 928–930.<br />
Ishida, T., Y. Asakawa, <strong>and</strong> T. Takemoto, 1981a. Metabolism <strong>of</strong> myrtenal, pellillaldehyde <strong>and</strong> dehydroabietic<br />
acid in rabbits. Res. Bull. Hiroshima Inst. Technol., 15: 79–91.<br />
Ishida, T., Y. Asakawa, T. Takemoto, <strong>and</strong> T. Aratani, 1981b. Terpenoids biotransformation in mammals. III.<br />
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> a-pinene, b-pinene, pinane, 3-carene, carane, myrcene, <strong>and</strong> p-cymene in rabbits.<br />
J. Pharm. Sci., 70: 406–415.<br />
Iscan, G., 2005. Unpublished data.<br />
Ismaili-Alaoui, M., B. Benjulali, D. Buisson, <strong>and</strong> R. Azerad, 1992. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> terpenic compounds<br />
by fungi I. Metabolism <strong>of</strong> R-(+)-pulegone. Tetrahedron Lett., 33: 2349–2352.<br />
Janssens, L., H.L. De Pooter, N.M. Schamp, <strong>and</strong> E.J. V<strong>and</strong>amme, 1992. Production <strong>of</strong> flavours by microorganisms.<br />
Process Biochem., 27: 195–215.<br />
Joglekar, S.S. <strong>and</strong> R.S. Dhavlikar, 1969. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> terpenoids. I. Identification <strong>of</strong> metabolites<br />
produced by a Pseudomonad from citronellal <strong>and</strong> citral. Appl. Microbiol., 18: 1084–1087.<br />
Kaji, M., H. Hamada, <strong>and</strong> T. Furuya, 2002. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> monoterpenes by Cyanobacterium <strong>and</strong> plant<br />
suspension cells. Proc. 46th TEAC, pp. 323–325.<br />
Kamino, F. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2005. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-<strong>and</strong> (-)-pinane-2,3-diol using plant pathogenic<br />
fungus, Glomerella cingulata as a biocatalyst. Proc. 49th TEAC, pp. 395–396.<br />
Kamino, F., Y. Noma, Y. Asakawa, <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2004. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (1S,2S,3R,5S)-(+)-pinane-2,3-<br />
diol using plant pathogenic fungus, Glomerella cingulata as a biocatalyst. Proc. 48th TEAC, pp. 383–384.<br />
Kayahara, H., T. Hayashi, C. <strong>and</strong> Tatsumi, 1973. Microbiological conversion <strong>of</strong> (-)-perillaldehyde <strong>and</strong> p-mentha-<br />
1,3-dien-7-al. J. Ferment. Technol., 51: 254–259.<br />
Kieslich, K., W.-R. Abraham, <strong>and</strong> P. Washausen, 1985. Microbial transformations <strong>of</strong> terpenoids. In: Topics in<br />
fl avor research, R.G. Berger, S. Nitz, <strong>and</strong> P. Schreier, eds, pp. 405–427. Marzling Hangenham:<br />
Eichborn.<br />
Koneman, E.W., S.D. Allen, W.M. J<strong>and</strong>a, P.C. Schreckenberger, <strong>and</strong> W.C. Winn, 1997. Color Atlas <strong>and</strong> Textbook<br />
<strong>of</strong> Diagnostic Microbiology, Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers.<br />
Kraidman, G., B.B. Mukherjee, <strong>and</strong> I.D. Hill, 1969. Conversion <strong>of</strong> limonene into an optically active isomer <strong>of</strong><br />
a-terpineol by a Cladosporium species. Bacteriological Proc., p. 63.<br />
Krasnobajew, V., 1984. Terpenoids. In: Biotechnology, K. Kieslich, ed., Vol. 6a, pp. 97–125. Weinheim: Verlag<br />
Chemie.<br />
Kumagae, S. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 1999. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> p-menthanes using common cutworm larvae,<br />
Spodoptera litura as a biocatalyst. Proc. 43rd TEAC, pp. 389–390.<br />
Lassak, E.V., J.T. Pinkey, B.J. Ralph, T. Sheldon, <strong>and</strong> J.J.H. Simes, 1973. Extractives <strong>of</strong> fungi. V. Microbial<br />
transformation products <strong>of</strong> piperitone. Aust. J. Chem., 26: 845–854.<br />
Liu, W., A. Goswami, R.P. Steffek, R.L. Chemman, F.S. Sariaslani, J.J. Steffens, <strong>and</strong> J.P.N. Rosazza, 1988.<br />
Stereochemistry <strong>of</strong> microbiological hydroxylations <strong>of</strong> 1,4-cineole. J. Org. Chem., 53: 5700–5704.<br />
MacRae, I.C., V. Alberts, R.M. Carman, <strong>and</strong> I.M. Shaw, 1979. Products <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole oxidation by a<br />
Pseudomonad. Aust. J. Chem., 32: 917–922.
730 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Madyastha, K.M. 1984. Microbial transformations <strong>of</strong> acyclic monoterpenes. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Chem.<br />
Sci.), 93: 677–686.<br />
Madyastha, K.M. <strong>and</strong> P.K. Bhattacharyya, 1968. Microbiological transformation <strong>of</strong> terpenes. Part XIII. Pathways<br />
for degradation <strong>of</strong> p-cymene in a soil pseudomonad (PL-strain). Indian J. Biochem., 5: 161–167.<br />
Madyastha, K.M. <strong>and</strong> V. Renganathan, 1983. Bio-degradation <strong>of</strong> acetates <strong>of</strong> geraniol, nerol <strong>and</strong> citronellol by<br />
P. incognita: Isolation <strong>and</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> metabolites. Indian J. Biochem. Biophys., 20: 136–140.<br />
Madyastha, K.M. <strong>and</strong> N.S.R. Krishna Murthy, 1988a. Regiospecific hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> acyclic monoterpene<br />
alcohols by Aspergillus niger. Tetrahedron Lett. 29: 579–580.<br />
Madyastha, K.M. <strong>and</strong> N.S.R. Krishna Murthy, 1988b. Transformations <strong>of</strong> acetates <strong>of</strong> citronellol, geraniol, <strong>and</strong><br />
linalool by Aspergillus niger: Regiospecific hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> citronellol by a cell-free system. Appl.<br />
Microbiol. Biotechnol., 28, 324–329.<br />
Madyastha, K.M., P.K. Bhattacharyya, <strong>and</strong> C.S. Vaidyanathan, 1977. Metabolism <strong>of</strong> a monoterpene alcohol,<br />
linalool, by a soil pseudomonad. Can. J. Microbiol., 23: 230–239.<br />
Mattison, J.E., L.L. McDowell, <strong>and</strong> R.H. Baum, 1971. Cometabolism <strong>of</strong> selected monoterpenoids by fungi<br />
associated with monoterpenoid-containing plants. Bacteriological Proc., p. 141.<br />
Miyamoto, Y. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2001. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-borneol by the larvae <strong>of</strong> common<br />
cutworm (Spodoptera litura) as a biocatalyst. Proc. 45th TEAC, pp. 377–378.<br />
Miyazato, Y. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 1999. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-a-fenchyl acetated using plant parasitic<br />
fungus, Glomerella cingulata as a biocatalyst. Proc. 43rd TEAC, pp. 213–214.<br />
Miyazawa, M., H. Furuno, K. Nankai, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1991d. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> verbenone by plant<br />
pathogenic microorganism, Rhizoctonia solani. Proc. 35th TEAC, pp. 274–275.<br />
Miyazawa, M., H. Furuno, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1992a. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> thujone by plant pathogenic microorganism,<br />
Botrytis allii IFO 9430. Proc. 36th TEAC, pp. 197–198.<br />
Miyazawa, M., H. Huruno, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1991a. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-pulegone to (-)-1R-8-hydroxy-<br />
4-p-menthen-3-one by Botrytis allii. Chem. Express, 6: 479–482.<br />
Miyazawa, M., H. Huruno, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1991b. Chem. Express, 6: 873.<br />
Miyazawa, M., H. Kakita, M. Hyakumachi, K. Umemoto, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1991e. Microbiological conversion<br />
<strong>of</strong> piperitone oxide by plant pathogenic fungi Rhizoctonia solani. Proc. 35th TEAC, pp. 276–277.<br />
Miyazawa, M., H. Kakita, M. Hyakumachi, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1992d. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> monoterpenoids<br />
having p-menthan-3-one skeleton by Rhizoctonis solani. Proc. 36th TEAC, pp. 191–192.<br />
Miyazawa, M., H. Kakita, M. Hyakumachi, K. Umemoto, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1992e. Microbiological conversion<br />
<strong>of</strong> monoterpenoids containing p-menthan-3-one skeleton by plant pathogenic fungi Rhizoctonia solani.<br />
Proc. 36th TEAC, pp. 193–194.<br />
Miyazawa, M., S. Kumagae, H. Kameoka, 1997a. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-menthol <strong>and</strong> (+)-menthol by common<br />
cutworm Larvae, Spodoptera litura as a biocatalyst. Proc. 41st TEAC, pp. 391–392.<br />
Miyazawa, M., S. Kumagae, H. Kameoka, 1997b. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-trans-myrtanol <strong>and</strong> (-)-trans-myrtanol<br />
by common cutworm Larvae, Spodoptera litura as a biocatalyst. Proc. 41st TEAC, pp. 389–390.<br />
Miyazawa, M. <strong>and</strong> Y. Miyamoto, 2004. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-(1R, 2S)-fenchol by the larvae <strong>of</strong> common<br />
cutworm (Spodoptera litura). Tetrahadron, 60: 3091–3096.<br />
Miyazawa, M., T. Murata, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1998. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> b-myrcene by common cutworm larvae,<br />
Spodoptera litura as a biocatalyst. Proc. 42nd TEAC, pp. 123–125.<br />
Miyazawa, M., H. Nankai, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1996a. Microbial oxidation <strong>of</strong> citronellol by Glomerella cingulata.<br />
Nat. Prod. Lett., 8: 303–305.<br />
Miyazawa, M., Y. Noma, K. Yamamoto, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1983. Microbiological conversion <strong>of</strong> d- <strong>and</strong><br />
l-limonene, Proc. 27th TEAC, pp. 147–149.<br />
Miyazawa, M., Y. Noma, K. Yamamoto, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1991c. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1,4-cineole to 2-endohydroxy-1,4-cineole<br />
by Aspergillus niger. Chem. Express, 6: 771–774.<br />
Miyazawa, M., Y. Noma, K. Yamamoto, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1992b. Biohydroxylation <strong>of</strong> 1,4-cineole to 9-hydroxy-1,4-cineole<br />
by Aspergillus niger. Chem. Express, 7: 305–308.<br />
Miyazawa, M., Y. Noma, K. Yamamoto, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1992c. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1,4-cineole to 3-endohydroxy-1,4-cineole<br />
by Aspergillus niger. Chem. Express, 7: 125–128.<br />
Miyazawa, M., Y. Suzuki, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1994b. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> myrtanol by plant pathogenic microorganism,<br />
Glomerella cingulata, Proc. 38th TEAC, pp. 96–97.<br />
Miyazawa, M., Y. Suzuki, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1997c. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)- <strong>and</strong> (+)-isopinocamphenol by<br />
three fungi. Phytochemistry, 45: 945–950.<br />
Miyazawa, M., T. Wada, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1995a. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> terpinene, limonene <strong>and</strong> a-phell<strong>and</strong>rene<br />
in common cutworm larvae, Spodoptera litura Fabricius, Proc. 39th TEAC, pp. 362–363.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 731<br />
Miyazawa, M., T. Wada, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1996b. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> p-menthanes using common cutworm<br />
larvae, Spodoptera litura as a biocatalyst. Proc. 40th TEAC, pp. 80–81.<br />
Miyazawa, M., K. Yamamoto, Y. Noma, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1990a. Bioconversion <strong>of</strong> (+)-fenchone to (+)-6-endohydroxyfenchone<br />
by Aspergillus niger. Chem. Express, 5: 237–240.<br />
Miyazawa, M., K. Yamamoto, Y. Noma, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1990b. Bioconversion <strong>of</strong> (+)-fenchone to 5-endohydroxyfenchone<br />
by Aspergillus niger. Chem. Express, 5: 407–410.<br />
Miyazawa, M., H. Yanahara, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1995c. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> trans-pinocarveol by plant pathogenic<br />
microorganism, Glomerella cingulata, <strong>and</strong> by the larvae <strong>of</strong> common cutworm, Spodoptera litura<br />
Fabricius. Proc. 39th TEAC, pp. 360–361.<br />
Miyazawa, M., H. Yanagihara, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1996c. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> pinanes by common cutworm<br />
larvae, Spodoptera litura as a biocatalyst. Proc. 40th TEAC, pp. 84–85.<br />
Miyazawa, M., K. Yokote, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1994a. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> linalool oxide by plant pathogenic<br />
microorganisms, Glomerella cingulata. Proc. 38th TEAC, pp. 101–102.<br />
Miyazawa, M., K. Yokote, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1995b. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 2-endo-hydroxy-1,4-cineole by plant<br />
pathogenic microorganism, Glomerella cingulata. Proc. 39th TEAC, pp. 352–353.<br />
Mizutani, S., T. Hayashi, H. Ueda, <strong>and</strong> C. Tstsumom, 1971. Microbiological conversion <strong>of</strong> terpenes. Part IX.<br />
Conversion <strong>of</strong> linalool. Nippon Nogei Kagaku Kaishi, 45: 368–373.<br />
Moroe, T., S. Hattori, A. Komatsu, <strong>and</strong> Y. Yamaguchi, 1971. Japanese Patent, 2.036. 875. no. 98195t.<br />
Mukherjee, B.B., G. Kraidman, <strong>and</strong> I.D. Hill, 1973. Synthesis <strong>of</strong> glycols by microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> some<br />
monocyclic terpenes. Appl. Microbiol., 25: 447–453.<br />
Mukherjee, B.B., G. Kraidman, I.D. Hill, 1974. Transformation <strong>of</strong> 1-menthene by a Cladosporium: Accumulation<br />
<strong>of</strong> b-isopropyl glutaric acid in the growth medium. Appl. Microbiol., 27: 1070–1074.<br />
Murakami, T., I. Ichimoto, <strong>and</strong> C. Tstsumom, 1973. Microbiological conversion <strong>of</strong> linalool. Nippon Nogei<br />
Kagaku Kaishi, 47: 699–703.<br />
Murata, T. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 1999. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> dihydromyrcenol by common cutworm larvae,<br />
Spodoptera litura as a biocatalyst. Proc. 43rd TEAC, pp. 393–394.<br />
Nakanishi, K. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2004. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-menthone by human liver microsomes. Proc.<br />
48th TEAC, pp. 401–402.<br />
Nakanishi, K. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2005. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)- menthol by liver microsomal humans<br />
<strong>and</strong> rats. Proc. 49th TEAC, pp. 423–425.<br />
Nishimura, H., S. Hiramoto, <strong>and</strong> J. Mizutani, 1983a. Biological activity <strong>of</strong> bottrospicatol <strong>and</strong> related compounds<br />
produced by microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-cis-carveol towards plants. Proc. 27th TEAC, pp. 107–109.<br />
Nishimura, H., S. Hiramoto, J. Mizutani, Y. Noma, A. Furusaki, <strong>and</strong> T. Matsumoto, 1983b. Structure <strong>and</strong> biological<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> bottrospicatol, a novel monoterpene produced by microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-ciscarveol.<br />
Agric. Biol. Chem., 47: 2697–2699.<br />
Nishimura, H. <strong>and</strong> Y. Noma, 1996. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> monoterpenes: flavor <strong>and</strong> biological activity. In:<br />
Biotechnology for Improved Foods <strong>and</strong> Flavors, G.R. Takeoka, R. Teranishi, P.J. Williams, <strong>and</strong><br />
A. Kobayashi, A., ACS Symp. Ser. 637, pp.173–187. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.<br />
Nishimura, H., Y. Noma, <strong>and</strong> J. Mizutani, 1982. Eucalyptus as biomass. Novel compounds from microbial<br />
conversion <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole. Agric. Biol. Chem., 46: 2601–2604.<br />
Nishimura, H., D.M. Paton, <strong>and</strong> M. Calvin, 1980. Eucalyptus radiata oil as a renewable biomass. Agric. Biol.<br />
Chem., 44: 2495–2496.<br />
Noma, Y., 1976. Microbiological conversion <strong>of</strong> carvone. Biochemical reduction <strong>of</strong> terpenes, part VI. Ann. Res.<br />
Stud. Osaka Joshigakuen Junior College, 20: 33–47.<br />
Noma, Y., 1977. Conversion <strong>of</strong> the analogues <strong>of</strong> carvone <strong>and</strong> dihydrocarvone by Pseudomonas ovalis, strain<br />
6-1, Biochemical reduction <strong>of</strong> terpenes, part VII. Nippon Nogeikagaku Kaishi, 51: 463–470.<br />
Noma, Y., 1979a. Conversion <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvone by Nocardia lurida A-0141 <strong>and</strong> Streptosporangium roseum<br />
IFO3776. Biochemical reduction <strong>of</strong> terpenes, part VIII. Nippon Nogeikagaku Kaishi, 53: 35–39.<br />
Noma, Y., 1979b. On the pattern <strong>of</strong> reaction mechanism <strong>of</strong> (+)-carvone conversion by actinomycetes.<br />
Biochemical reduction <strong>of</strong> terpenes, part X, Ann. Res. Stud. Osaka Joshigakuen Junior College, 23:<br />
27–31.<br />
Noma, Y., 1980. Conversion <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvone by strains <strong>of</strong> Streptomyces, A-5–1 <strong>and</strong> Nocaradia, 1–3–11. Agric.<br />
Biol. Chem., 44: 807–812.<br />
Noma, Y., 1984. Microbiological conversion <strong>of</strong> carvone, Kagaku to Seibutsu, 22: 742–746.<br />
Noma, Y., 1988. Formation <strong>of</strong> p-menthane-2,8-diols from (-)-dihydrocarveol <strong>and</strong> (+)-dihydrocarveol by<br />
Aspergillus spp., The Meeting <strong>of</strong> Kansai Division <strong>of</strong> The Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Chemical Society <strong>of</strong> Japan,<br />
Kagawa, p. 28.
732 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Noma, Y., 2000. unpublished data.<br />
Noma, Y., 2007. Microbial production <strong>of</strong> mosquitocidal (1R,2S,4R)-(+)-menthane- 2,8-diol. In: Aromatic<br />
Plants from Asia their Chemistry <strong>and</strong> Application in Food <strong>and</strong> Therapy, L. Jiarovetz, N.X. Dung, <strong>and</strong><br />
V.K. Varshney, pp. 169–186. Dehradun: Har Krishan Bhalla & Sons.<br />
Noma, Y., <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1992. Enantio- <strong>and</strong> diastereoselectivity in the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> carveols by<br />
Euglena gracilis Z. Phytochem., 31: 2009–2011.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1995. Aspergillus spp.: Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Terpenoids <strong>and</strong> Related Compounds.<br />
In: Biotechnology in Agriculture <strong>and</strong> Forestry, Vol. 33. Medicinal <strong>and</strong> Aromatic Plants VIII, Y.P.S. Bajaj,<br />
ed., pp. 62–96. Berlin: Springer.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1998. Euglena gracilis Z: Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> terpenoids <strong>and</strong> related compounds.<br />
In: Biotechnology in Agriculture <strong>and</strong> Forestry, Vol. 41. Medicinal <strong>and</strong> Aromatic Plants X, Y.P.S. Bajaj,<br />
ed., pp. 194–237. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2005a. New metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> b-pinene <strong>and</strong> related compounds by Aspergillus<br />
niger. Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 36th ISEO, p. 32.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2005b. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-myrtenol <strong>and</strong> (-)-nopol. Proc. 49th TEAC,<br />
pp. 78–80.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2006a. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-limonene <strong>and</strong> related compounds by Citrus pathogenic<br />
fungi. Proc. 50th TEAC, pp. 431–433.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2006b. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> b-pinene, myrtenol, nopol <strong>and</strong> nopol benzyl ether by<br />
Aspergillus niger TBUYN-2. Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 37th ISEO, p. 144.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2006c. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-nopol benzyl ether. Proc. 50th TEAC,<br />
pp. 434–436.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2007a. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> limonene <strong>and</strong> related compounds by newly isolated low<br />
temperature grown citrus pathogenic fungi <strong>and</strong> red yeast. Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 38th ISEO, p. 7.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2007b. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> limonene <strong>and</strong> related compounds. Proc. 51st<br />
TEAC, pp. 299–301.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2008. New metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> (+)-carvone by Citrus pathogenic Aspergillus<br />
niger Tiegh CBAYN <strong>and</strong> A. niger TBUYN-2, Proc. 52nd TEAC, pp. 206–208.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> M. Iwami, 1994. Separation <strong>and</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> terpene convertible actinomycetes: S. bottropensis<br />
SY-2-1, S. ikutamanensis Ya-2-1 <strong>and</strong> S. humidus Tu-1. Bull. Tokushima Bunri Univ., 47: 99–110.<br />
Noma, Y., M. Miyazawa, K. Yamamoto, H. Kameoka, T. Inagaki, <strong>and</strong> H. Sakai, 1984. Microbiological conversion<br />
<strong>of</strong> perillaldehyde. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> l- <strong>and</strong> dl-perillaldehyde by Streptomyces ikutamanensis,<br />
Ya-2-1, Proc. 28th TEAC, pp. 174–176.<br />
Noma, Y., H. Nishimura, <strong>and</strong> C. Tatsumi, 1980. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> carveol by Actinomycetes.<br />
1. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-cis-carveol <strong>and</strong> (-)-trans-carveol by Streptomyces bottropensis, SY-2-1,<br />
Proc. 24th TEAC, pp. 67–70.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> H. Nishimura, 1980. Microbiological transformation <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole. Oxidative products from<br />
1,8-cineole by S. bottropensis, SY-2-1. Annual Meeting <strong>of</strong> Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Biological Chemical Society,<br />
Book <strong>of</strong> abstracts, p. 28.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> H. Nishimura, 1981. Microbiological transformation <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole. Production <strong>of</strong> 3b-hydroxy-<br />
1,8-cineole from 1,8-cineole by S. ikutamanensis, Ya-2-1. Annual Meeting <strong>of</strong> Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Biological<br />
Chemical Society, Book <strong>of</strong> abstracts, p. 196.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> H. Nishimura, 1982. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> carvone. 4. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-carvone by<br />
Streptomyces bottropensis, SY-2-1. Proc. 26th TEAC, pp. 156–159.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> H. Nishimura, 1983a. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvone <strong>and</strong> (+)-carvone by S. ikutamanensis<br />
Ya-2-1. Annual Meeting <strong>of</strong> Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Biological Chemical Society, Book <strong>of</strong> abstracts, p. 390.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> H. Nishimura, 1983b. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> carvone. 5. Microbiological transformation <strong>of</strong> dihydrocarvones<br />
<strong>and</strong> dihydrocarveols, Proc. 27th TEAC, pp. 302–305.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> H. Nishimura, 1984. Microbiological conversion <strong>of</strong> carveol. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-cis-carveol<br />
<strong>and</strong> (+)-cis-carveol by S. bottropensis, Sy-2-1. Proc. 28th TEAC, pp. 171–173.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> H. Nishimura, 1987. Bottrospicatols, novel monoterpenes produced on conversion <strong>of</strong> (-)- <strong>and</strong><br />
(+)-cis-carveol by Streptomyces. Agric. Biol. Chem., 51: 1845–1849.<br />
Noma, Y., H. Nishimura, S. Hiramoto, M. Iwami, <strong>and</strong> C. Tstsumi, 1982. A new comound, (4R, 6R)-(+)-6,8-<br />
oxidomenth-1-en-9-ol produced by microbial conversion <strong>of</strong> (-)-cis-carveol. Agric. Biol. Chem., 46:<br />
2871–2872.<br />
Noma, Y., S. Nonomura, <strong>and</strong> H. Sakai, 1974a. Conversion <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvotanacetone <strong>and</strong> (+)-carvotanacetone by<br />
Pseudomonas ovalis, strain 6-1, Agric. Biol. Chem., 38: 1637–1642.
Noma, Y., S. Nonomura, H. Ueda, <strong>and</strong> C. Tatsumi, 1974b. Conversion <strong>of</strong> (+)-carvone by Pseudomonas ovalis,<br />
strain 6-1(1). Agric. Biol. Chem., 38: 735–740.<br />
Noma, Y., S. Nonomura, H. Ueda, H. Sakai, <strong>and</strong> C. Tstusmi, 1974c. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> carvone. Proc.<br />
18th TEAC, pp. 20–23.<br />
Noma, Y., S. Nonomura, <strong>and</strong> H. Sakai, 1975. Epimerization <strong>of</strong> (-)-isodihydrocarvone to (-)-dihydrocarvone by<br />
Pseudomonas fragi IFO 3458. Agric. Biol. Chem., 39: 437–441.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> S. Nonomura, 1974. Conversion <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvone <strong>and</strong> (+)-carvone by a strain <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus niger.<br />
Agric. Biol. Chem., 38: 741–744.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> H. Sakai, 1984. Investigation <strong>of</strong> the conversion <strong>of</strong> (-)-perillyl alcohol, 1,8-cineole, (+)-carvone<br />
<strong>and</strong> (-)-carvone by rare actinomycetes. Ann. Res. Stud. Osaka Joshigakuen Junior College, 28: 7–18.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> C. Tatsumi, 1973. Conversion <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvone by Pseudomonas ovalis, strain 6-1(1), Microbial<br />
conversion <strong>of</strong> terpenes part XIII. Nippon Nogeikagaku Kaishi, 47: 705–711.<br />
Noma, Y., M. Toyota, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1985a. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvone <strong>and</strong> (+)-carvone by Aspergillus<br />
spp. Annual Meeting <strong>of</strong> Agricultural <strong>and</strong> Biological Chemistry, Sapporo, p. 68.<br />
Noma, Y., M. Toyota, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1985b. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> carvone. 6. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvone<br />
<strong>and</strong> (+)-carvone by a strain <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus niger. Proc. 29th TEAC, pp. 235–237.<br />
Noma, Y., M. Toyota, Y. <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 1985c. Microbiological conversion <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvotanacetone <strong>and</strong> (+)-carvotanacetone<br />
by S. bottropensis SY-2-1. Proc. 29th TEAC, pp. 238–240.<br />
Noma, Y., M. Toyota, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1986. Reduction <strong>of</strong> terpene aldehydes <strong>and</strong> epoxidation <strong>of</strong> terpene alcohols<br />
by S. ikutamanensis, Ya-2-1. Proc. 30th TEAC, pp. 204–206.<br />
Noma, Y., M. Toyota, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1988a. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> thymol formation <strong>of</strong> 2-hydroxy-3-<br />
p-menthen-5-one by Streptomyces humidus, Tu-1. Proc. 28th TEAC, pp. 177–179.<br />
Noma, Y., H. Takahashi, M. Toyota, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1988b. Microbiological conversion <strong>of</strong> (-)-carvotanacetone<br />
<strong>and</strong> (+)-carvotanacetone by a strain <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus niger. Proc. 32nd TEAC, pp. 146–148.<br />
Noma, Y., H. Takahashi, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1989. Microbiological conversion <strong>of</strong> menthol. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong><br />
(+)-menthol by a strain <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus niger. Proc. 33rd TEAC, pp. 124–126.<br />
Noma, Y., H. Takahashi, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1990. Microbiological conversion <strong>of</strong> p-menthane 1. Formation<br />
<strong>of</strong> p-menthane-1,9-diol from p-menthane by a strain <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus niger. Proc. 34th TEAC,<br />
pp. 253–255.<br />
Noma, Y., H. Takahashi, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1991a. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> terpene aldehyde by Euglena gracilis<br />
Z. Phytochem., 30: 1147–1151.<br />
Noma, Y., N. Miki, E. Akehi, E. Manabe, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1991b. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> monoterpenes by photosynthetic<br />
marine algae, Dunaliella tertiolecta, Proc. 35th TEAC, pp. 112–114.<br />
Noma, Y., E. Akehi, N. Miki, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1992a. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> terpene aldehyde, aromatic aldehydes<br />
<strong>and</strong> related compounds by Dunaliella tertiolecta. Phytochemistry, 31: 515–517.<br />
Noma, Y., S. Yamasaki, <strong>and</strong> Asakawa Y. 1992b. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> limonene <strong>and</strong> related compounds by<br />
Aspergillus cellulosae. Phytochemistry, 31: 2725–2727.<br />
Noma, Y., H. Takahashi, T. Hashimoto, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1992c. Biotransforamation <strong>of</strong> isopiperitenone, 6-gingerol,<br />
6-shogaol <strong>and</strong> neomenthol by a strain <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus niger. Proc. 37th TEAC, pp. 26–28.<br />
Noma, Y., A. Sogo, S. Miki, N. Fujii, T. Hashimoto, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakwawa, 1992d. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> terpenoids<br />
<strong>and</strong> related compounds. Proc. 36th TEAC, pp. 199–201.<br />
Noma, Y., H. Takahashi, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1993. Formation <strong>of</strong> 8 kinds <strong>of</strong> p-menthane-2,8-diols from carvone<br />
<strong>and</strong> related compounds by Euglena gracilis Z. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> monoterpenes by photosynthetic<br />
microorganisms. Part VIII. Proc. 37th TEAC, pp. 23–25.<br />
Noma, Y., T. Higata, T. Hirata, Y. Tanaka, T. Hashimoto, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1995. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> [6- 2 H]-(-<br />
)-carvone by Aspergillus niger, Euglena gracilis Z <strong>and</strong> Dunaliella tertiolecta, Proc. 39th TEAC,<br />
pp. 367–368.<br />
Noma, Y., K. Hirata, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1996. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole. Why do the biotransformed 2a<strong>and</strong><br />
3a-hydroxy-1,8-cineole by Aspergillus niger have no optical activity? Proc. 40th TEAC, pp. 89–91.<br />
Noma, Y., K. Matsueda, I. Maruyama, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1997. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> terpenoids <strong>and</strong> related<br />
compounds by Chlorella species. Proc. 41st TEAC, pp. 227–229.<br />
Noma, Y., J. Watanabe, T. Hashimoto, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2001. Microbiological transformation <strong>of</strong> b-pinene.<br />
Proc. 45th TEAC, pp. 88–90.<br />
Noma, Y., M. Furusawa, T. Hashimoto, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2002. Stereoselective formation <strong>of</strong> (1R, 2S, 4R)-(+)-pmenthane-2,8-diol<br />
from a-pinene. Book <strong>of</strong> Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 33rd ISEO, p. 142.<br />
Noma, Y., F. Kamino, T. Hashimoto, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2003. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-pinane-2,3-diol<br />
<strong>and</strong> related compounds by Aspergillus niger. Proc. 47th TEAC, pp. 91–93.<br />
733
734 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Noma, Y., M. Furusawa, T. Hashimoto, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2004. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-3-pinanone by<br />
Aspergillus niger. Proc. 48th TEAC, pp. 390–392.<br />
Noma, Y., T. Hashimoto, S. Uehara, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2009. unpublished data.<br />
Nonoyama, H., H. Matsui, M. Hyakumachi, <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 1999. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-menthone using<br />
plant parasitic fungi, Rhizoctonia solani as a biocatalyst. Proc. 43rd TEAC, pp. 387–388.<br />
Ohsawa, M. <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, M. 2001. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-isopulegol by the larvae <strong>of</strong> common<br />
cutworm (Spodoptera litura) as a biocatalyst. Proc. 45th TEAC, pp. 375–376.<br />
Omata, T. Iwam N. oto, T. Kimura, A. Tanaka, S. Fukui, 1981. Stereoselective hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> dl-menthyl succinate<br />
by gel-entrapped Rhodotorula minuta var. texensis cells in organic solvent. Appl. Microbiol.<br />
Biotechnol., 11: 119–204.<br />
Oosterhaven, K., K.J. Hartmans, <strong>and</strong> J.J.C. Scheffer, 1995a. Inhibition <strong>of</strong> potato sprouts growth by carvone<br />
enantiomers <strong>and</strong> their bioconversion in sprouts. Potato Res., 38: 219–230.<br />
Oosterhaven, K., B. Poolman, <strong>and</strong> E.J. Smid, 1995b. S-Carvone as a natural potato sprouts inhibiting, fungistatic<br />
<strong>and</strong> bacteriostatic compound. Ind. Crops Prod., 4: 23–31.<br />
Oritani, T. <strong>and</strong> K. Yamashita, 1973a. Microbial dl-acyclic alcohols, Agric. Biol. Chem., 37: 1923–1928.<br />
Oritani, T. <strong>and</strong> Yamashita, K. 1973b. Microbial resolution <strong>of</strong> racemic 2- <strong>and</strong> 3-alkylcyclohexanols. Agric. Biol.<br />
Chem., 37: 1695–1700.<br />
Oritani, T. <strong>and</strong> K. Yamashita, 1973c. Microbial resolution <strong>of</strong> dl-isopulegol. Agric. Biol. Chem., 37: 1687–1689.<br />
Oritani, T. <strong>and</strong> K. Yamashita, 1973d. Microbial resolution <strong>of</strong> racemic carvomenthols. Agric. Biol. Chem.,<br />
37: 1691–1694.<br />
Oritani, T. <strong>and</strong> K. Yamashita, 1974. Microbial resolution <strong>of</strong> (±)-borneols. Agric. Biol. Chem., 38: 1961–1964.<br />
Oritani, T. <strong>and</strong> Yamashita, K. 1980. Optical resolution <strong>of</strong> dl-b, g-unsaturated terpene alcohols by biocatalyst <strong>of</strong><br />
microorganism. Proc. 24th TEAC, pp. 166–169.<br />
Pfrunder, B. <strong>and</strong> Ch. Tamm, 1969a. Mikrobiologische Umw<strong>and</strong>lung von bicyclischen monoterpenen durch<br />
Absidia orchidis (Vuill.) Hagem. 2. Teil: Hydroxylierung von Fenchon und Is<strong>of</strong>enchon. Helv. Chim.<br />
Acta., 52: 1643–1654.<br />
Pfrunder, B. <strong>and</strong> Ch. Tamm, 1969b. Mikrobiologische Umw<strong>and</strong>lung von bicyclischen monoterpenen durch<br />
Absidia orchidis (Vuill.) Hagem. 1. Teil: Reduktion von Campherchinon und Is<strong>of</strong>enchonchinon. Helv.<br />
Chim. Acta., 52: 1630–1642.<br />
Prema, B.R. <strong>and</strong> P.K. Bhattachayya, 1962. Microbiological transformation <strong>of</strong> terpenes. II. Transformation <strong>of</strong><br />
a-pinene. Appl. Microbiol., 10: 524–528.<br />
Rama Devi, J. <strong>and</strong> P.K. Bhattacharyya, 1977a. Microbiological transformations <strong>of</strong> terpenes. Part XXIV.<br />
Pathways <strong>of</strong> degradation <strong>of</strong> linalool, geraniol, nerol <strong>and</strong> limonene by Pseudomonas incognita, linalool<br />
strain. Indian J. Biochem. Biophys., 14: 359–363.<br />
Rama Devi, J. <strong>and</strong> P.K. Bhattacharyya, 1977b. Microbiological transformation <strong>of</strong> terpenes. Part XXIII.<br />
Fermentation <strong>of</strong> geraniol, nerol <strong>and</strong> limonene by soil Pseudomonad, Pseudomonas incognita (linalool<br />
strain). Indian J. Biochem. Biophys., 14: 288–291.<br />
Rama Devi, J., S.G. Bhat, <strong>and</strong> P.K. Bhattacharyya, 1977. Microbiological transformations <strong>of</strong> terpenes. Part<br />
XXV. Enzymes involved in the degradation <strong>of</strong> linalool in the Pseudomonas incognita, linalool strain.<br />
Indian J. Biochem. Biophys., 15: 323–327.<br />
Rama Devi, J. <strong>and</strong> P.K. Bhattacharyya, 1978. Molecular rearrangements in the microbiological transformations<br />
<strong>of</strong> terpenes <strong>and</strong> the chemical logic <strong>of</strong> microbial processes. J. Indian Chem. Soc., 55: 1131–1137.<br />
Rapp. A. <strong>and</strong> H. M<strong>and</strong>ery, 1988. Influence <strong>of</strong> Botrytis cinerea on the monoterpene fraction wine aroma. In:<br />
Bi<strong>of</strong>l avour’87. Analysis – Biochemistry – Biotechnology, ed. Schreier P., Walter de Gruyter <strong>and</strong> Co.,<br />
Berlin, pp. 445–452.<br />
Saeki M. <strong>and</strong> N. Hashimoto, 1968. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> terpene hydrocarbons. Part I. Oxidation products<br />
<strong>of</strong> d-limonene <strong>and</strong> d-pentene. Proc. 12th TEAC, pp. 102–104.<br />
Saeki, M. <strong>and</strong> N. Hashimoto, 1971. Microorganism biotransformation <strong>of</strong> terpenoids. Part II. Production <strong>of</strong> cisterpin<br />
hydrate <strong>and</strong> terpineol from d-limonene. Proc. 15th TEAC, pp. 54–56.<br />
Saito, H. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2006. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole by Salmonella typhimurium OY1001/3A4.<br />
Proc. 50th TEAC, pp. 275–276.<br />
Savithiry, N., T.K. Cheong, <strong>and</strong> P. Oriel, 1997. Production <strong>of</strong> alpha-terpineol from Escherichia coli cells<br />
expressing thermostable limonene hydratase. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 63–65: 213–220.<br />
Sawamura, Y., S. Shima, H. Sakai, <strong>and</strong> C. Tatsumi, 1974. Microbiological conversion <strong>of</strong> menthone. Proc. 18th<br />
TEAC, pp. 27–29.<br />
Schwammle, B., E. Winkelhausen, S. Kuzmanova, <strong>and</strong> W. Steiner, 2001. Isolation <strong>of</strong> carvacrol assimilating<br />
microorganisms. Food Technol. Biotechnol., 39: 341–345.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Monoterpenoids by Microorganisms, Insects, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 735<br />
Seubert, W. <strong>and</strong> E. Fass, 1964a. Studies on the bacterial degradation <strong>of</strong> isoprenoids. V. The mechanism <strong>of</strong> isoprenoid<br />
degradation. Biochem. Z., 341: 35–44.<br />
Seubert, W. <strong>and</strong> E. Fass, 1964b. Studies on the bacterial degradation <strong>of</strong> isoprenoids. IV. The purification <strong>and</strong><br />
properties <strong>of</strong> beta-isohexenylglutaconyl-COA-hydratase <strong>and</strong> beta-hydroxy-beta-isohexenylglutaryl-<br />
COA-lyase. Biochem. Z., 341: 23–34.<br />
Seubert, W. <strong>and</strong> U. Remberger, 1963. Studies on the bacterial degradation <strong>of</strong> isoprenoid compounds. II. The<br />
role <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide. Biochem. Z., 338: 245–246.<br />
Seubert, W., E. Fass, <strong>and</strong> U. Remberger, 1963. Studies on the bacterial degradation <strong>of</strong> isoprenoid compounds.<br />
III. Purification <strong>and</strong> properties <strong>of</strong> geranyl carboxylase. Biochem. Z., 338: 265–275.<br />
Shima, S., Y. Yoshida, Y. Sawamura, <strong>and</strong> C. Tstsumi, 1972. Microbiological conversion <strong>of</strong> perillyl alcohol.<br />
Proc. 16th TEAC, pp. 82–84.<br />
Shimoda, K., D.I. Ito, S. Izumi, <strong>and</strong> T. Hirata, 1996. Novel reductase participation in the syn-addition <strong>of</strong> hydrogen<br />
to the C=C bond <strong>of</strong> enones in the cultured cells <strong>of</strong> Nicotiana tabacum. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.<br />
1, 355–358.<br />
Shimoda, K., T. Hirata, <strong>and</strong> Y. Noma, 1998. Stereochemistry in the reduction <strong>of</strong> enones by the reductase from<br />
Euglena gracilis. Z. Phytochem., 49: 49–53.<br />
Shimoda, K., S. Izumi, <strong>and</strong> T. Hirata, 2002. A novel reductase participating in the hydrogenation <strong>of</strong> an exocyclic<br />
C–C double bond <strong>of</strong> enones from Nicotiana tabacum. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 75: 813–816.<br />
Shimoda, K., N. Kubota, H. Hamada, <strong>and</strong> M. Kaji, 2003. Cyanobacterium catalyzed asymmetric reduction <strong>of</strong><br />
enones. Proc. 47th TEAC, pp. 164–166.<br />
Shindo, M., T. Shimada, <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2000. Metabolism <strong>of</strong> 1,8-cineole by cytochrome P450 enzymes in<br />
human <strong>and</strong> rat liver microsomes. Proc. 44th TEAC, pp. 141–143.<br />
Shukla, O.P., <strong>and</strong> P.K. Bhattacharyya, 1968. Microbiological transformations <strong>of</strong> terpenes: Part XI—Pathways<br />
<strong>of</strong> degradation <strong>of</strong> a- & b-pinenes in a soil Pseudomonad (PL-strain). Indian J. Biochem., 5: 92–101.<br />
Shukla, O.P., M.N. Moholay, <strong>and</strong> P.K. Bhattacharyya, 1968. Microbiological transformation <strong>of</strong> terpenes: Part<br />
X—Fermantation <strong>of</strong> a- & b-pinenes by a soil Pseudomonad (PL-strain). Indian J. Biochem., 5: 79–91.<br />
Shukla, O.P., R.C. Bartholomeus, <strong>and</strong> I.C. Gunsalus, 1987. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> menthol <strong>and</strong> menthane-<br />
3,4-diol. Can. J. Microbiol., 33: 489–497.<br />
Southwell, I.A. <strong>and</strong> T.M. Flynn, 1980. Metabolism <strong>of</strong> a- <strong>and</strong> b-pinene, p-cymemene <strong>and</strong> 1,8-cineole in the<br />
brush tail possum. Xenobiotica, 10: 17–23.<br />
Suga, T. <strong>and</strong> T. Hirata, 1990. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> exogenous substrates by plant cell cultures. Phytochemistry,<br />
29: 2393–2406.<br />
Suga, T., T. Hirata, <strong>and</strong> H. Hamada, 1986. The stereochemistry <strong>of</strong> the reduction <strong>of</strong> carbon–carbon double bond<br />
with the cultured cells <strong>of</strong> Nicotiana tabacum. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 59: 2865–2867.<br />
Sugie, A. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2003. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-a-pinene by human liver microsomes. Proc. 47th<br />
TEAC, pp. 159–161.<br />
Swamy, G.K., K.L. Khanch<strong>and</strong>ani, <strong>and</strong> P.K. Bhattacharyya, 1965. Symposium on recent advances in the chemistry<br />
<strong>of</strong> terpenoids, Natural Institute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s <strong>of</strong> India, New Dehli, p. 10.<br />
Takagi, K., Y. Mikami, Y. Minato, I. Yajima, <strong>and</strong> K. Hayashi, 1972. Manufacturing metho <strong>of</strong> carvone by microorganisms,<br />
Japanese Patent 72-38998.<br />
Takahashi, H., Y. Noma, M. Toyota, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1994. The biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)- <strong>and</strong> (+)-neomenthols<br />
<strong>and</strong> isomenthols by Aspergillus niger. Phytochemistry, 35: 1465–1467.<br />
Takeuchi, H. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2004. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> nerol by the larvae <strong>of</strong> common cutworm (Spodoptera<br />
litura) as a biocatalyst. Proc. 48th TEAC, pp. 399–400.<br />
Takeuchi, H. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2005. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)- <strong>and</strong> (+)-citronellene by the larvae <strong>of</strong> common<br />
cutworm (Spodoptera litura) as biocatalyst. Proc. 49th TEAC, pp. 426–427.<br />
Trudgill, P.W., 1990. Microbial metabolism <strong>of</strong> terpenes—recent developments. Biodegradation 1: 93–105.<br />
Tsukamoto, Y., S. Nonomura, H. Sakai, <strong>and</strong> C. Tatsumi, 1974. Microbiological oxidation <strong>of</strong> p-menthane<br />
1. Formation <strong>of</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> p-cis-menthan-1-ol. Proc. 18th TEAC, pp. 24–26.<br />
Tsukamoto, Y., S. Nonomura, <strong>and</strong> H. Sakai, 1975. Formation <strong>of</strong> p-cis-menthan-1-ol from p-menthane by<br />
Pseudomonas mendociana SF. Agric. Biol. Chem., 39: 617–620.<br />
Van der Werf, M.J., J.A.M. de Bont, <strong>and</strong> D.J. Leak, 1997. Opportunities in microbial biotransformation <strong>of</strong><br />
monoterpenes. Adv. Biochem. Eng./Biotechnol., 55: 147–177.<br />
Van der Werf, M.J. <strong>and</strong> J.A.M. de Bont, 1998a. Screening for microorganisms converting limonene into carvone.<br />
In: New frontiers in screening for microbial biocatalysts, Proc. Int. Symp., Ede, The Netherl<strong>and</strong>s,<br />
K. Kieslich, C.P. Beek, J.A.M. van der Bont, <strong>and</strong> W.J.J. van den Tweel, eds, Vol. 53, pp. 231–234. Studies<br />
in Organic Chemistry.
736 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Van der Werf, M.J., K.M. Overkamp, <strong>and</strong> J.A.M. de Bont, 1998b. Limonene-1,2-epoxide hydrolase from<br />
Rhodococcus erythropolis DCL14 belongs to a novel class <strong>of</strong> epoxide hydrolases. J. Bacteriol., 180:<br />
5052–5057.<br />
van Dyk, M.S., E. van Rensburg, I.P.B. Rensburg, <strong>and</strong> N. Moleleki, 1998. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> monoterpenoid<br />
ketones by yeasts <strong>and</strong> yeast-like fungi, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 5: 149–154.<br />
Verstegen-Haaksma, A.A., H.J. Swarts, B.J.M. Jansen, A. de Groot, N. Bottema-MacGillavry, <strong>and</strong> B. Witholt,<br />
1995. Application <strong>of</strong> S-(+)-carvone in the synthesis <strong>of</strong> biologically active natural products using chemical<br />
transformations <strong>and</strong> bioconversions. Ind. Crops Prod., 4: 15–21.<br />
Watanabe, T., H. Nomura, T. Iwasaki, A. Matsushima, <strong>and</strong> T. Hirata, 2007. Cloning <strong>of</strong> pulegone reductase <strong>and</strong><br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> enones with the recombinant reductase. Proc. 51st TEAC, pp. 323–325.<br />
Watanabe, Y. <strong>and</strong> T. Inagaki, 1977a. Japanese Patent 77.12.989. No. 187696x.<br />
Watanabe, Y. <strong>and</strong> T. Inagaki, 1977b. Japanese Patent 77.122.690. No. 87656g.<br />
Wolf-Rainer, A., 1994. Phylogeny <strong>and</strong> biotransformation. Part 5. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> isopinocampheol.<br />
Z. Naturforsch., 49c: 553–560.<br />
Yamada, K., S. Horiguchi, <strong>and</strong> J. Tatahashi, 1965. Studies on the utilization <strong>of</strong> hydrocarbons by microorganisms.<br />
Part VI. Screening <strong>of</strong> aromatic hydrocarbon-assimilating microorganisms <strong>and</strong> cumic acid formation<br />
from p-cymene. Agric. Biol. Chem., 29: 943–948.<br />
Yamaguchi, Y., A. Komatsu, <strong>and</strong> T. Moroe, 1977. Asymmetric hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> dl-menthyl acetate by Rhodotorula<br />
mucilaginosa. J. Agric. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 51: 411–416.<br />
Yamamoto, K., M. Miyazawa, H. Kameoka, <strong>and</strong> Y. Noma, 1984. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> d- <strong>and</strong> l-fenchone by a<br />
strain <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus niger. Proc. 28th TEAC, pp. 168–170.<br />
Yamanaka, T. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 1999. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-trans-verbenol by common cutworm larvae,<br />
Spodoptera litura as a biocatalyst. Proc. 43rd TEAC, pp. 391–392.<br />
Yawata, T., M, Ogura, K. Shimoda, S. Izumi, <strong>and</strong> T. Hirata, 1998. Epoxidation <strong>of</strong> monoterpenes by the peroxidase<br />
from the cultured cells <strong>of</strong> Nicotiana tabacum, Proc. 42nd TEAC, pp. 142–144.<br />
Yonemoto, N., S. Sakamoto, T. Furuya, <strong>and</strong> H. Hamada, 2005. Preparation <strong>of</strong> (-)-perillyl alcohol oligosaccharides.<br />
Proc. 49th TEAC, pp. 108–110.
15<br />
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong><br />
Sesquiterpenoids, Ionones,<br />
Damascones, Adamantanes,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Aromatic Compounds by<br />
Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong><br />
Mammals<br />
Yoshinori Asakawa <strong>and</strong> Yoshiaki Noma<br />
CONTENTS<br />
15.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 737<br />
15.2 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Sesquiterpenoids by Microorganisms .......................................... 738<br />
15.2.1 Highly Efficient Production <strong>of</strong> Nootkatone (2) from Valencene (1) .................. 738<br />
15.2.2 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Valencene (1) by Aspergillus niger<br />
<strong>and</strong> Aspergillus wentii ........................................................................................ 741<br />
15.2.3 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Nootkatone (2) by Aspergillus niger ............................... 743<br />
15.2.4 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Nootkatone (2) by Fusarium culmorum<br />
<strong>and</strong> Botryosphaeria dothidea ............................................................................ 745<br />
15.2.5 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-1(10)-Aristolene (36) from the Crude Drug<br />
Nardostachys chinensis by Chlorella fusca, Mucor species,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Aspergillus niger ......................................................................................... 749<br />
15.2.6 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Various Sesquiterpenoids by Microorganisms ................ 754<br />
15.3 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Sesquiterpenoids by Mammals, Insects,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Cytochrome P-450 ................................................................................................... 819<br />
15.3.1 Animals (Rabbits) <strong>and</strong> Dosing ........................................................................... 819<br />
15.3.2 Sesquiterpenoids ................................................................................................ 820<br />
15.4 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Ionones, Damascones, <strong>and</strong> Adamantanes ..................................... 823<br />
15.5 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Aromatic Compounds ................................................................... 828<br />
References .................................................................................................................................. 835<br />
15.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
Recently, environment-friendly green or clean chemistry is emphasized in the field <strong>of</strong> organic <strong>and</strong><br />
natural product chemistry. Noyori’s high-efficient production <strong>of</strong> (-)-menthol using (S)-BINAP-Rh<br />
737
738 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
catalyst is one <strong>of</strong> the most important green chemistries (Tani et al., 1982; Otsuka <strong>and</strong> Tani, 1991)<br />
<strong>and</strong> 1000 ton <strong>of</strong> (-)-menthol has been produced by this method in 1 year. On the other h<strong>and</strong>,<br />
enzymes <strong>of</strong> microorganisms <strong>and</strong> mammals are able to transform a huge variety <strong>of</strong> organic compounds,<br />
such as mono- sesqui-, <strong>and</strong> diterpenoids, alkaloids, steroids, antibiotics, <strong>and</strong> amino acids<br />
from crude drugs <strong>and</strong> spore-forming green plants to produce pharmacologically <strong>and</strong> medicinally<br />
valuable substances.<br />
Since Meyer <strong>and</strong> Neuberg (1915) studied the microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> citronellal, there are a<br />
great number <strong>of</strong> reports concerning biotrasformation <strong>of</strong> essential oils, terpenoids, steroids, alkaloids,<br />
<strong>and</strong> acetogenins using bacteria, fungi, <strong>and</strong> mammals. In 1988 Mikami (Mikami, 1988)<br />
reported the review article <strong>of</strong> biotransformation <strong>of</strong> terpenoids entitled “Microbial Conversion <strong>of</strong><br />
Terpenoids.” Lamare <strong>and</strong> Furstoss (1990) reviewed biotransformation <strong>of</strong> more than 25 sesquiterpenoids<br />
by microorganisms. In this chapter, the recent advances in the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> natural<br />
<strong>and</strong> synthetic compounds; sesquiterpenoids, ionones, a-damascone, <strong>and</strong> adamantanes, <strong>and</strong> aromatic<br />
compounds, using microorganisms including algae <strong>and</strong> mammals are described.<br />
15.2 BIOTRANSFORMATION OF SESQUITERPENOIDS BY MICROORGANISMS<br />
15.2.1 HIGHLY EFFICIENT PRODUCTION OF NOOTKATONE (2) FROM VALENCENE (1)<br />
The most important <strong>and</strong> expensive grapefruit aroma, nootkatone (2), decreases the somatic fat ratio<br />
(Haze et al., 2002), <strong>and</strong> therefore its highly efficient production has been requested by the cosmetic<br />
<strong>and</strong> fiber industrial sectors. Previously, valencene (1) from the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Valencia orange was<br />
converted into nootkatone (2) by biotransformation using Enterobacter species only in 12% yield<br />
(Dhavlikar <strong>and</strong> Albroscheit, 1973), Rodococcus KSM-5706 in 0.5% yield with a complex mixture<br />
(Okuda et al., 1994), <strong>and</strong> using Cytochrome P450 (CYP450) in 20% yield with other complex<br />
products (Sowden et al., 2005). Nootkatone (2) was chemically synthesized from valencene (1) with<br />
AcOOCMe 3 in three steps <strong>and</strong> chromic acid in low yield (Wilson <strong>and</strong> Saw, 1978) <strong>and</strong> using surfacefunctionalized<br />
silica supported by metal catalysts such as Co 2+ , Mn 2+ , <strong>and</strong> so on with tert-butyl<br />
hydroperoxide in 75% yield (Salvador <strong>and</strong> Clark, 2002). However, these synthetic methods are not<br />
safe because they involve toxic heavy metals. An environment-friendly method for the synthesis <strong>of</strong><br />
nootkatone that does not use any heavy metals such as chromium <strong>and</strong> manganese must be designed.<br />
The commercially available <strong>and</strong> cheap sesquiterpene hydrocarbon (+)-valencene (1) ([a] D + 84.6°,<br />
c = 1.0) obtained from Valencia orange oil was very efficiently converted into nootkatone (2) by<br />
biotransformations using Chlorella (Hashimoto et al., 2003a), Mucor species (Hashimoto et al.,<br />
2003), Botryosphaeria dothidea, <strong>and</strong> Botryodiplodia theobromae (Furusawa et al., 2005, 2005a;<br />
Noma et al., 2001a).<br />
Chlorella fusca var. vacuolata IAMC-28 (Figure 15.1) was inoculated <strong>and</strong> cultivated while stationary<br />
under illumination in Noro medium MgCl 2 ◊6H 2 O (1.5 g), MgSO 4 ◊7H 2 O (0.5 g), KCl (0.2 g),<br />
CaCl 2 ◊2H 2 O (0.2 g), KNO 3 (1.0 g), NaHCO 3 (0.43 g), TRIS (2.45 g), K 2 HPO 4 (0.045 g), Fe-EDTA<br />
(3.64 mg), EDTA-2Na (1.89 mg), ZnSO 4 ◊7H 2 O (1.5 g), H 3 BO 2 (0.61 mg), CoCl 2 ◊6H 2 O (0.015 mg),<br />
CuSO 4 ◊5H 2 O (0.06 mg), MnCl 2 ◊4H 2 O (0.23 mg), <strong>and</strong> (NH 4 ) 6 Mo 7 O 24 ◊4H 2 O (0.38 mg), in distilled<br />
H 2 O 1 L (pH 8.0). Czapek-peptone medium [1.5% sucrose, 1.5% glucose, 0.5% polypeptone, 0.1%<br />
K 2 HPO 4 , 0.05% MgSO 4 ◊7H 2 O, 0.05% KCl, <strong>and</strong> 0.001% FeSO 4 ◊7H 2 O, in distilled water (pH 7.0)] was<br />
used for the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> substrate by microorganism. Aspergillus niger was isolated in our<br />
laboratories from soil in Osaka prefecture, <strong>and</strong> was identified according to its physiological <strong>and</strong><br />
morphological characters.<br />
(+)-Valencene (1) (20 mg/50 mL) isolated from the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Valencia orange was added to the<br />
medium <strong>and</strong> biotransformed by Chlorella fusca for a further 18 days to afford nootkatone (2) [gas<br />
chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) peak area: 89%; isolated yield: 63%] (Figure 15.2)<br />
(Furusawa et al., 2005, 2005a; Noma et al., 2001a). The reduction <strong>of</strong> 2 with NaBH 4 <strong>and</strong> CeCl 3 gave
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 739<br />
FIGURE 15.1 Chlorella fusca var. vacuolata.<br />
2a-hydroxyvalencene (3) in 87% yield, followed by Mitsunobu reaction with p-nitrobenzoic acid,<br />
triphenylphosphine, <strong>and</strong> diethyl azodicarboxylate to give nootkatol (2b-hydroxyvalencene) (4),<br />
possessing calcium-antagonistic activity isolated from Alpinia oxyphylla (Shoji et al., 1984) in 42%<br />
yield. Compounds 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 thus obtained were easily biotransformed by Chlorella fusca <strong>and</strong><br />
Chlorella pyrenoidosa for only 1 day to give nootkatone (2) in good yield (80–90%), respectively.<br />
900,000<br />
26.58<br />
O<br />
800,000<br />
700,000<br />
Nootkatone (2)<br />
Abundance<br />
600,000<br />
500,000<br />
400,000<br />
300,000<br />
200,000<br />
100,000<br />
0<br />
Valencene (1)<br />
22.70 25.33<br />
25.88 29.89<br />
19.39<br />
5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00<br />
Time<br />
FIGURE 15.2 Total ion chromatogram <strong>of</strong> metabolites <strong>of</strong> valencene (1) by Chlorella fusca var. vacuolata.
740 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 15.1<br />
Conversion <strong>of</strong> Valencene (1) to Nootkatone (2) by Chlorella sp. for 14 Days<br />
Metabolites (% <strong>of</strong> the Total in GC-MS)<br />
Conversion<br />
Chlorella sp. Valencene (1) 2a-Nootkatol (3) 2b-Nootkatol (4) Nootkatone (2) Ratio (%)<br />
C. fusca 11 0 0 89 89<br />
C. pyrenoidosa 7 0 0 93 93<br />
C. vulgaris 0 0 0 100 100<br />
The biotransformation <strong>of</strong> compound 1 was further carried out by Chlorella pyrenoidosa <strong>and</strong><br />
Chlorella vulgaris (Furusawa et al., 2005, 2005a) <strong>and</strong> soil bacteria (Noma et al., 2001) to give nootkatone<br />
in good yield (Table 15.1).<br />
In the time course <strong>of</strong> the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1 by Chlorella pyrenoidosa, the yield <strong>of</strong> nootkatone<br />
(2) <strong>and</strong> nootkatol (4) without 2a-hydroxyvalencene (3) increased with the decrease in that<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1, <strong>and</strong> subsequently the yield <strong>of</strong> 2 increased with decrease in that <strong>of</strong> 3. In the metabolic pathway<br />
<strong>of</strong> valencene (1), 1 was slowly converted into nootkatol (4), <strong>and</strong> subsequently 4 was rapidly converted<br />
into 2, as shown in Figure 15.3.<br />
A fungus strain from the soil adhering to the thalloid liverwort Pallavicinia subciliata, Mucor<br />
species, which was inoculated <strong>and</strong> cultivated statically in Czapek-peptone medium (pH 7.0) at 30°C<br />
for 7 days. Compound 1 (20 mg/50 mL) was added to the medium <strong>and</strong> incubated for a further 7 days.<br />
2 1<br />
4<br />
10<br />
5 7<br />
Valencene (1)<br />
12<br />
11<br />
13<br />
Chlorella sp.<br />
slow<br />
Chlorella sp.<br />
slow<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
3 4<br />
Fast<br />
Fast<br />
O<br />
Nootkatone (2)<br />
FIGURE 15.3 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> valencene (1) by Chlorella species.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 741<br />
Nootkatone (2) was then obtained in very high yield (82%) (Furusawa et al., 2005; Noma et al.,<br />
2001a).<br />
The biotransformation from 1 to 2 was also examined using the plant pathogenic fungi<br />
Botryosphaeria dothidea <strong>and</strong> Botryodiplodia theobromae (a total <strong>of</strong> 31 strains) separated from<br />
fungi infecting various types <strong>of</strong> fruit, <strong>and</strong> so on. Botryosphaeria dothidea <strong>and</strong> Botryodiplodia theobromae<br />
were both inoculated <strong>and</strong> cultivated while stationary in Czapek-peptone medium (pH 7.0)<br />
at 30°C for 7 days. The same size <strong>of</strong> the substrate 1 was added to each medium <strong>and</strong> incubated for a<br />
further 7 days to obtain nootkatone (42–84%) (Furusawa et al., 2005).<br />
The expensive grapefruit aromatic, nootkatone (2) used by cosmetic <strong>and</strong> fiber manufacturers was<br />
obtained in high yield by biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-valencene (1), which can be cheaply obtained<br />
from Valencia orange, by Chlorella species, fungi such as Mucor species, Botryosphaeria dothidea,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Botryodiplodia theobromae. This is a very inexpensive <strong>and</strong> clean oxidation reaction, which<br />
does not use any heavy metals, <strong>and</strong> thus this method is expected to find applications in the industrial<br />
production <strong>of</strong> nootkatone.<br />
15.2.2 BIOTRANSFORMATION OF VALENCENE (1) BY ASPERGILLUS NIGER<br />
AND ASPERGILLUS WENTII<br />
Valencene (1) from Valencia orange oil was cultivated by Aspergillus niger in Czapek-peptone<br />
medium, for 5 days to afford six metabolites 5 (1.0%), 6 <strong>and</strong> 7 (13.5%), 8 (1.1%), 9 (1.5%), 10 (2.0%),<br />
<strong>and</strong> 11 (0.7%), respectively. Ratio <strong>of</strong> compounds 6 (11S) <strong>and</strong> 7 (11R) was determined as 1:3 by HPLC<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> their thiocarbonates (12 <strong>and</strong> 13) (Noma et al., 2001a) (Figure 15.4).<br />
2 1<br />
4<br />
10<br />
5 7<br />
1<br />
12<br />
11<br />
13<br />
A. niger<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
5 (1.0%)<br />
OH<br />
S<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
6 1:3<br />
7<br />
R<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
(13.3%)<br />
8 (1.1%)<br />
OH O<br />
OH<br />
9 (1.5%)<br />
R<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
10 (1.6%)<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
11 (0.7%)<br />
FIGURE 15.4 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> valencene (1) by Aspergillus niger.
742 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Compounds 8–11 could be biosynthesized by elimination <strong>of</strong> a hydroxy group <strong>of</strong> 2-hydroxyvalencenes<br />
(3, 4). Compound 3 was biotransformed for 5 days by Aspergillus niger to give three metabolites<br />
6 <strong>and</strong> 7 (6.4%), 8 (34.6%), <strong>and</strong> 9 (5.5%), respectively. Compound 4 was biotransformed for 5 days by<br />
Aspergillus niger to give three metabolites: 6 <strong>and</strong> 7 (21.8%), 9 (5.5%), <strong>and</strong> 10 (10.4%), respectively<br />
(Figure 15.5).<br />
HO<br />
1 2<br />
4<br />
10<br />
5 7<br />
3<br />
12<br />
11<br />
13<br />
A. niger<br />
O<br />
O<br />
S<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
6 7 8 (34.6%)<br />
1:3<br />
R<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
(6.4%)<br />
O<br />
9 (5.5%)<br />
R<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
2 1<br />
4<br />
10<br />
5 7<br />
4<br />
11<br />
13<br />
A. niger<br />
12<br />
O<br />
O<br />
S<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
6<br />
1:3<br />
7 9 (5.5%)<br />
R<br />
O<br />
R<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
(21.8%)<br />
HO<br />
R<br />
10 (10.4%)<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 15.5 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 2a-hydroxyvalencene (3) <strong>and</strong> 2b-hydroxyvalencene (4) by Aspergillus<br />
niger.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 743<br />
1<br />
[O]<br />
H + H<br />
H +<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
4H<br />
3<br />
–H 2 O<br />
[O]<br />
[O]<br />
[O]<br />
O<br />
9<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 15.6 Possible pathway <strong>of</strong> biotransformation <strong>of</strong> valencene (1) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
10<br />
8<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
Both ratios <strong>of</strong> 6 (11S) <strong>and</strong> 7 (11R) obtained from 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 were 1:3, respectively. From the above<br />
results, plausible metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> valencene (1) <strong>and</strong> 2-hydroxyvalencene (3, 4) by Aspergillus<br />
niger are shown in Figure 15.6 (Noma et al., 2001a).<br />
Aspergillus wentii <strong>and</strong> Eurotrium purpurasens converted valencene (1) to 11,12-epoxide (14a)<br />
<strong>and</strong> the same diol (6, 7) (Takahashi <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 2005) as well as nootkatone (2) <strong>and</strong> 2a-hydroxyvalencene<br />
(3) (Takahashi <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 2006).<br />
Kaspera et al. (2005) reported that valencene (1) was incubated in submerged cultures <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ascomycete Chaetomium globosum, to give nootkatone (2), 2a-hydroxyvalencene (3), <strong>and</strong> valencene<br />
11,12-epoxide (14a), together with a valencene ketodiol, valencenediols, a valencene ketodiol,<br />
a valencene triol, or valencene epoxydiol that were detected by liquid chromatography-mass spectrocopy<br />
(LC-MS) spectra <strong>and</strong> GC-MS <strong>of</strong> trimethyl silyl derivatives. These metabolites are accumulated<br />
preferably inside the fungal cells (Figure 15.7).<br />
The metabolites <strong>of</strong> valencene, nootkatone (2), (3), <strong>and</strong> (14a), indicated grapefruit with sour <strong>and</strong><br />
citrus with bitter odor, respectively. Nootkatone 11,12-epoxide (14) showed no volatile fragrant<br />
properties.<br />
15.2.3 BIOTRANSFORMATION OF NOOTKATONE (2) BY ASPERGILLUS NIGER<br />
Aspergillus niger was inoculated <strong>and</strong> cultivated rotatory (100 rpm) in Czapek-peptone medium at<br />
30°C for 7 days. (+)-Nootkatone (2), ([a] D + 193.5°, c = 1.0), (80 mg/200 mL), which was isolated
744 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
c<br />
HO<br />
3<br />
c<br />
HO<br />
1<br />
4<br />
a,c<br />
a,b,c<br />
14a<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
2<br />
b<br />
5<br />
OH<br />
6,7<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
b,c<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
14<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 15.7 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> valencene (1) <strong>and</strong> nootkatone (2) by Aspergillus wentii, Epicoccum<br />
purpurascens, <strong>and</strong> Chaetomium globosum.<br />
15a<br />
a: Aspergillus wentii<br />
b: Epicoccum purpurasens<br />
c: Chaetomium globosum<br />
15b<br />
from the essential oil <strong>of</strong> grapefruit, was added to the medium <strong>and</strong> further cultivated for 7 days to<br />
obtain two metabolites, 12-hydroxy-11,12-dihydronootkatone (5) (10.6%) <strong>and</strong> C11 stereo-mixtures<br />
(51.5%) <strong>of</strong> nootkatone-11S,12-diol (6) <strong>and</strong> its 11R isomer (7) (11R:11S = 1:1) (Hashimoto et al.,<br />
2000a; Noma et al., 2001a; Furusawa et al., 2003) (Figure 15.8).<br />
11,12-epoxide (14) obtained by epoxidation <strong>of</strong> nootkatone (2) with mCPBA was biotransformed<br />
by Aspergillus niger for 1 day to afford 6 <strong>and</strong> 7 (11R:11S = 1:1) in good yield (81.4%). 1-aminobenzotriazole,<br />
an inhibitor <strong>of</strong> CYP450, inhibited the oxidation process <strong>of</strong> 1 into compounds 5–7 (Noma<br />
et al., 2001a). From the above results, possible metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> nootkatone (2) by Aspergillus<br />
niger might be considered as shown in Figure 15.9.<br />
The same substrate was incubated with Aspergillus wentii to produce diol (6, 7) <strong>and</strong> 11,12- -<br />
epoxide (14) (Takahashi <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 2005).
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 745<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
7 (47.2%)<br />
R<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
15a (14.9%)<br />
O<br />
2 1<br />
4<br />
10<br />
5 7<br />
2<br />
Fusarium culmorum (7 days)<br />
12<br />
11<br />
13<br />
Aspergillus niger (5 days)<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
5 (10.6%)<br />
OH<br />
S<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
6 7<br />
R<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
(51.5%)<br />
O<br />
2 1<br />
4<br />
10<br />
5 7 12<br />
11<br />
2 13<br />
Botryosphaeria dothidea (14 days)<br />
O<br />
S<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
6<br />
3:2<br />
7<br />
R<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
16(20.9%)<br />
OH<br />
(54.2%)<br />
FIGURE 15.8 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> nootkatone (2) by Fusarium culmorum, Aspergillus niger, <strong>and</strong><br />
Botryosphaeria dothidea.<br />
15.2.4 BIOTRANSFORMATION OF NOOTKATONE (2) BY FUSARIUM CULMORUM<br />
AND BOTRYOSPHAERIA DOTHIDEA<br />
(+)-Nootkatone (2) was added to the same medium as mentioned above including Fusarium culmorum<br />
to afford nootkatone-11R,12-diol (7) (47.2%) <strong>and</strong> 9b-hydroxynootkatone (15) (14.9%) (Noma<br />
et al., 2001a).
746 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
11<br />
12<br />
2<br />
Cytochrome P-450<br />
O<br />
O<br />
15b<br />
OH<br />
14<br />
O<br />
[H]<br />
[H]<br />
[H 2 O]<br />
O<br />
5<br />
12<br />
11 OH<br />
O<br />
6: 11S<br />
7: 11R<br />
11 12<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 15.9 Possible pathway <strong>of</strong> biotransformation <strong>of</strong> valencene (1) by Cytochrome P-450.<br />
Compound 7 was stereospecifically obtained at C11 by biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1. Purity <strong>of</strong> compound<br />
7 was determined as ca. 95% by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> the thiocarbonate (13).<br />
The biotransformation <strong>of</strong> nootkatone (2) was examined by the plant pathogenic fungus,<br />
Botryosphaeria dothidea separated from the fungus that infected the peach. (+)-Nootkatone (2) was<br />
cultivated with Botryosphaeria dothidea (Peach PP8402) for 14 days to afford nootkatone diols<br />
(6 <strong>and</strong> 7) (54.2%) <strong>and</strong> 7a-hydroxynootkatone (16) (20.9%). Ratio <strong>of</strong> compounds 6 <strong>and</strong> 7 was determined<br />
as 3:2 by HPLC analysis <strong>of</strong> the thiocarbonates (12, 13) (Noma et al., 2001a). Nootkatone<br />
(2) was administered into rabbits to give the same diols (6, 7) (Asakawa et al., 1986; Ishida, 2005).<br />
Epicoccum purpurascens also biotransformed nootkatone (2) to 5–7, 14, <strong>and</strong> 15a (Takahashi <strong>and</strong><br />
Miyazawa, 2006).<br />
The biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 2 by Aspergillus niger <strong>and</strong> Botryosphaeria dothidea resembled to that<br />
<strong>of</strong> the oral administration to rabbit since the ratio <strong>of</strong> the major metabolites 11S- (6) <strong>and</strong> 11R-nootkatone-<br />
11,12-diol (7) was similar. It is noteworthy that the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 2 by Fusarium culmorum<br />
affords stereospecifically nootkatone-11R, 12-diol (7) (Noma et al., 2001a) (Figure 15.10).<br />
Metabolites 3–5, 12, <strong>and</strong> 13 from (+)-nootkatone (2) <strong>and</strong> 14–17 from (+)-valencene (1) did not<br />
show an effective odor.<br />
Dihydronootkatone (17), which shows that citrus odor possesses antitermite activity, was also<br />
treated in Aspergillus niger to obtain 11S-mono- (18) <strong>and</strong> 11R-dihydroxylated products (19) (the ratio<br />
11S <strong>and</strong> 11R = 3:2). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, Aspergillus cellulosae reduced ketone group at C2 <strong>of</strong> 17 to<br />
give 2a- (20) (75.7%) <strong>and</strong> 2b-hydroxynootkatone (21) (0.7%) (Furusawa et al., 2003) (Figure 15.11).<br />
Tetrahydronootkatone (22) also shows antitermite <strong>and</strong> mosquito-repellant activity. It was incubated<br />
with Aspergillus niger to give two similar hydroxylated compounds (23, 13.6% <strong>and</strong> 24, 9.9%)<br />
to those obtained from 17 (Furusawa, 2006) (Figure 15.12).<br />
8,9-Dehydronootkatone (25) was incubated with Aspergillus niger to give four metabolites, a<br />
unique acetonide (26, 15.6%), monohydroxylated (27, 0.2%), dihydroxylated (28, 69%), <strong>and</strong> a<br />
carboxyl derivative (29, 0.8%) (Figure 15.13).
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 747<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
5<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
6 7<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
8<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
9<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
10<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
11<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
12<br />
11<br />
S<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O 13<br />
11<br />
R<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
11 12<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
14<br />
O<br />
15<br />
16<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
14a<br />
15a<br />
15b OH<br />
FIGURE 15.10 Metabolites (5–11, 14–15b) from valencene (1) <strong>and</strong> nootkatone (2) by various microorganisms.<br />
When the same substrate was treated in Aspergillus sojae IFO 4389, compound 25 was converted<br />
to the different monohydroxylated product (30, 15.8%) from that mentioned above. Aspergillus<br />
cellulosae is an interesting fungus since it did not give any same products as mentioned above;<br />
in place, it produced trinorsesquitepene ketone (31, 6%) <strong>and</strong> nitrogen-containing aromatic compound<br />
(32) (Furusawa et al., 2003) (Figure 15.14).<br />
Mucor species also oxidized compound 25 to give three metabolites, 13-hydroxy-8,9-dehydronootkatone<br />
(33, 13.2%), an epoxide (34, 5.1%), <strong>and</strong> a diol (35, 19.9%) (Furusawa et al., 2003). The<br />
same substrate was investigated with cultured suspension cells <strong>of</strong> the liverwort, Marchantia<br />
polymorpha to afford 33 (Hegazy et al., 2005) (Figure 15.15).<br />
Although Mucor species could give nootkatone (21) from valencene (1), this fungus biotransformed<br />
the same substrate (25) to the same alcohol (30, 13.2%) obtained from the same starting<br />
compound (25) in Aspergillus sojae, a new epoxide (34, 5.1%) <strong>and</strong> a diol (35, 9.9%).<br />
The metabolites (3, 4, 20, 21) inhibited the growth <strong>of</strong> lettuce stem, <strong>and</strong> 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 inhibited germination<br />
<strong>of</strong> the same plant (Hashimoto <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 2007).<br />
Valerianol (35a), from Valeriana <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis whose dried rhizome is traditionally used for its<br />
carminative <strong>and</strong> sedative properties, was biotransformed by Mucor plumbeus, to produce three<br />
metabolites, a bridged ether (35b), <strong>and</strong> a triol (35c), which might be formed via C1–C10 epoxide,<br />
<strong>and</strong> 35d arises from double dehydration (Arantes et al., 1999). In this case, allylic oxidative compounds<br />
have not been found (Figure 15.16).
748 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
A. niger<br />
11<br />
R H<br />
18 (4%)<br />
OH<br />
17<br />
O<br />
19 (62%)<br />
11S:11 R = 2:3<br />
11<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
2<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
A. cellulosae 20 (75.7%)<br />
17<br />
HO<br />
2<br />
H<br />
21 (0.7%)<br />
FIGURE 15.11 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> dihydronootkatone (17) by Aspergillus niger <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus cellulosae.<br />
O<br />
H<br />
11<br />
O<br />
H<br />
A. niger<br />
23 (13.6%)<br />
OH<br />
22<br />
24 (9.9%)<br />
FIGURE 15.12 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> tetrahydronootkatone (22) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
O<br />
H<br />
11<br />
12<br />
OH<br />
OH
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 749<br />
O<br />
A. niger<br />
O<br />
11 12<br />
O<br />
R<br />
O<br />
26 (15.6%)<br />
O<br />
27 (0.2%)<br />
11<br />
OH<br />
25<br />
O<br />
O<br />
11<br />
12 11<br />
12<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
29 (0.8%)<br />
28 (69.7%)<br />
C-11 mixtures (3:2)<br />
O<br />
A. sojae<br />
8 days<br />
O<br />
12<br />
13<br />
25<br />
OH<br />
30 (15.8%)<br />
FIGURE 15.13 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 8,9-dehydronootkatone (25) by Aspergillus sojae.<br />
15.2.5 BIOTRANSFORMATION OF (+)-1(10)-ARISTOLENE (36) FROM THE CRUDE DRUG<br />
NARDOSTACHYS CHINENSIS BY CHLORELLA FUSCA, MUCOR SPECIES, AND ASPERGILLUS NIGER<br />
The structure <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenoid, (+)-1(10)-aristolene (= calarene) (36) from the crude drug<br />
Nardostachys chinensis was similar to that <strong>of</strong> nootkatone. 2-Oxo-1(10)-aristolene (38) shows<br />
antimelanin inducing activity <strong>and</strong> excellent citrus fragrance. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the enantiomer<br />
(37) <strong>of</strong> 36 <strong>and</strong> (+)-aristolone (41) were also found in the liverworts as the natural products. In order<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
A. cellulosae<br />
31 (6.0%)<br />
25<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
NH<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
OCH 3<br />
32<br />
FIGURE 15.14 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 8,9-dehydronootkatone (25) by Aspergillus cellulosae.
750 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
Marchantia polymorpha cells<br />
25<br />
Mucor sp.<br />
O<br />
13<br />
33 (13.2%)<br />
12<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
34 (5.1%)<br />
FIGURE 15.15 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 8,9-dehydronootkatone (25) by Marchantia polymorpha <strong>and</strong> Mucor<br />
species.<br />
O<br />
11<br />
12<br />
11<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
13<br />
35 (19.9%)<br />
to obtain compound 38 <strong>and</strong> its analogues, compound 36 was incubated with Chlorella fusca var.<br />
vacuolata IAMC-28, Mucor species, <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus niger (Furusawa et al., 2006a) (Figure 15.17).<br />
Chlorella fusca was inoculated <strong>and</strong> cultivated stationary in Noro medium (pH 8.0) at 25°C for<br />
7 days <strong>and</strong> (+)-1(10)-aristolene (36) (20 mg/50 mL) was added to the medium <strong>and</strong> further incubated<br />
for 10–14 days <strong>and</strong> cultivated stationary under illumination (pH 8.0) at 25°C for 7 days to afford<br />
1(10)-aristolen-2-one (38, 18.7%), (-)-aristolone (39, 7.1%), <strong>and</strong> 9-hydroxy-1(10)-aristolen-2-one<br />
(40). Compounds 38 <strong>and</strong> 40 were found in Aristolochia species (Figure 15.18).<br />
Mucor species was inoculated <strong>and</strong> cultivated rotatory (100 rpm) in Czapek-peptone medium<br />
(pH 7.0) at 30°C for 7 days. (+)-1(10)-Aristolene (36) (100 mg/200 mL) was added to the medium <strong>and</strong><br />
further for 7 days. The crude metabolites contained 38 (0.9%) <strong>and</strong> 39 (0.7%) as very minor products<br />
(Figure 15.19).<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
+H 2 O<br />
–H 2 O<br />
OH<br />
M. plumbeus<br />
35c<br />
OH<br />
–H 2 O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
35a<br />
35b<br />
FIGURE 15.16 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> valerianol (35a) by Mucor plumbeus.<br />
35d<br />
OH
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 751<br />
1<br />
O<br />
2<br />
9<br />
10 8<br />
3 4<br />
5 6<br />
7<br />
13<br />
11<br />
14 15<br />
36 12<br />
37 38<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
39<br />
FIGURE 15.17 Naturally occurring aristolane sesquiterpenoids.<br />
40<br />
41<br />
Although Mucor species produced a large amount <strong>of</strong> nootkatone (2) from valencene (1), however,<br />
only poor yield <strong>of</strong> similar products as those from valencene (1) was seen in the biotransformation <strong>of</strong><br />
tricyclic substrate (36). Possible biogenetic pathway <strong>of</strong> (+)-1(10)-aristolene (36) is shown in<br />
Figure 15.20.<br />
Aspergillus niger was inoculated <strong>and</strong> cultivated rotatory (100 rpm) in Czapek-peptone medium<br />
(pH 7.0) at 30°C for 3 days. (+)-1(10)-Aristolene (36) (100 mg/200 mL) was added to the medium <strong>and</strong><br />
further for 7 days. From the crude metabolites four new metabolic products (42, 1.3%), (43, 3.2%),<br />
(44, 0.98%), <strong>and</strong> (45, 2.8%) were obtained in very poor yields (Figure 15.21). Possible metabolic<br />
pathways <strong>of</strong> 36 by Aspergillus niger are shown in Figure 15.22.<br />
Commercially available (+)-1(10)-aristolene (36) was treated with Diplodia gossypina <strong>and</strong><br />
Bacillus megaterium. Both microorganisms converted 36 to four (46–49; 0.8%, 1.1, 0.16%, 0.38%)<br />
<strong>and</strong> six metabolites, (40, 50–55; 0.75%, 1.0%, 1.0%, 2.0%, 1.1%, 0.5%, 0.87%), together with 40<br />
(0.75%) respectively (Abraham et al., 1992) (Figure 15.23).<br />
1(10)-Aristolene (36)<br />
C. fusca<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
38<br />
(18.7%)<br />
39<br />
(7.1%)<br />
FIGURE 15.18 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1(10)-aristolene (36) by Chlorella fusca.<br />
40<br />
(7.0%)
752 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Mucor sp.<br />
O<br />
O<br />
36 38 (0.9%)<br />
39 (0.7%)<br />
FIGURE 15.19 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1(10)-aristolene (36) by Mucor species.<br />
C. fusca<br />
HO<br />
C. fusca<br />
O<br />
36<br />
Route c<br />
C. fusca<br />
Mucor sp.<br />
Mucor sp.<br />
Route a<br />
Route b<br />
C. fusca<br />
Mucor sp.<br />
Mucor sp.<br />
[O]<br />
38<br />
C. fusca<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
40<br />
C. fusca<br />
Mucor sp.<br />
[O]<br />
C. fusca<br />
Mucor sp.<br />
C. fusca<br />
O<br />
39<br />
FIGURE 15.20<br />
species.<br />
Possible pathway <strong>of</strong> biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1(10)-aristolene (36) by Chlorella fusca <strong>and</strong> Mucor<br />
O<br />
CO OH<br />
HO<br />
CO OH<br />
36<br />
A. niger<br />
6 days<br />
42 (1.3%)<br />
HO<br />
43 (2.7%)<br />
O<br />
CO OH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
44 (0.8%)<br />
FIGURE 15.21 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1(10)-aristolene (36) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
45 (2.1%)<br />
O
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 753<br />
H +<br />
HO<br />
A. niger<br />
[O]<br />
H<br />
36<br />
Route a<br />
Route b<br />
[O]<br />
[O]<br />
route c<br />
[O]<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
COOH<br />
HO<br />
COOH<br />
38 43<br />
O<br />
H +<br />
O<br />
H<br />
42<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
44<br />
COOH<br />
HO<br />
COOH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
+<br />
O –<br />
HO<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H +<br />
45<br />
FIGURE 15.22 Possible pathway <strong>of</strong> biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1(10)-aristolene (36) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
O<br />
D. gossypina<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
R<br />
36 46<br />
OH<br />
R<br />
B. megaterium<br />
O<br />
47: R=CH 2 OH<br />
48: R=COOH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
49<br />
R<br />
HO<br />
R 2<br />
36 50: R=α-OH<br />
51: R=β-OH<br />
40<br />
52: R=H<br />
53: R=OH<br />
R 1<br />
54: R 1 =OH,R 2 =H<br />
55: R 1 =H,R 2 =OH<br />
FIGURE 15.23 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1(10)-aristolene (36) by Diplodia gossypina <strong>and</strong> Bacillus megaterium.
754 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
It is noteworthy that Chlorella <strong>and</strong> Mucor species introduce hydroxyl group at C2 <strong>of</strong> the substrate<br />
(36) as seen in the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> valencene (1) while Diplodia gossypina <strong>and</strong> Bacillus megaterium<br />
oxidizes C2, C8, C9, <strong>and</strong>/or 1,1-dimethyl group on a cyclopropane ring. Aspergillus niger<br />
oxidizes not only C2 but also stereoselectively oxidized one <strong>of</strong> the gem-dimethyl groups on cyclopropane<br />
ring. Stereoselective oxidation <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> gem-dimethyl <strong>of</strong> cyclopropane <strong>and</strong> cyclobutane<br />
derivatives is observed in biotransformation using mammals (see later).<br />
15.2.6 BIOTRANSFORMATION OF VARIOUS SESQUITERPENOIDS BY MICROORGANISMS<br />
Aromadendrane-type sesquiterpenoids have been found not only in higher plants but also in liverworts<br />
<strong>and</strong> marine sources. Three aromadendrenes (56, 57, 58) were biotransformed by Diplodia<br />
gossypina, Bacillus megaterium, <strong>and</strong> Mycobacterium smegmatis (Abraham et al., 1992).<br />
Aromadendrene (56) (800 mg) was converted by Bacillus megaterium to afford a diol (59) <strong>and</strong> a<br />
triol (60) <strong>of</strong> which 59 (7 mg) was the major product. The triol (60) was also obtained from the<br />
metabolite <strong>of</strong> (+)-(1R)-aromadendrene (56) by the plant pathogen Glomerella cingulata (Miyazawa<br />
et al., 1995a). allo-Aromadendrene (57) (1.2 g) was also treated in Mycobacterium smegmatis to<br />
afford 61 (10 mg) (Abraham et al., 1992) (Figure 15.24).<br />
The same substrate was also incubated with Glomerella cingulata to afford C10 epimeric triol<br />
(62) (Miyazawa et al., 1995a). Globulol (58) (400 mg) was treated in Mycobacterium smegmatis to<br />
give only a carboxylic acid (63) (210 mg). The same substrate (58) (1 g) was treated in Diplodia<br />
gossypina <strong>and</strong> Bacillus megaterium to give two diols, 64 (182 mg), 65 <strong>and</strong> a triol (66) from the<br />
former <strong>and</strong> 67–69 from the latter organism among which 64 (60 mg) was predominant (Abraham<br />
et al., 1992). Glomerella cingulata <strong>and</strong> Botrytis cinerea also bioconverted globulol (58) to diol (64)<br />
regio- <strong>and</strong> stereoselectively (Miyazawa et al., 1994) (Figures 15.25 <strong>and</strong> 15.26).<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
B. megaterium<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
56 59<br />
60<br />
H<br />
H<br />
M. smegmatis<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
57 61<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
M. smegmatis<br />
H<br />
58<br />
63<br />
FIGURE 15.24 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> aromadendrene (56), alloaromadendrene (57), <strong>and</strong> globulol (58) by<br />
Bacillus megaterium <strong>and</strong> Mycobacterium smegmatis.<br />
H<br />
COOH
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 755<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
G. cingulata<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
56<br />
60<br />
H<br />
G. cingulata<br />
H<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
57<br />
FIGURE 15.25 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> aromadendrene (56) <strong>and</strong> alloaromadendrene (57) by Glomerella<br />
cingulata.<br />
62<br />
Globulol (58) (1.5 g) <strong>and</strong> 10-epiglobulol (70) (1.2 mL) were separately incubated with<br />
Cephalosporium aphidicola in shake culture for 6 days to give the same diol 64 (780 mg) as obtained<br />
from the same substrate by Bacillus megaterium mentioned above <strong>and</strong> 71 (720 mg), (Hanson<br />
et al., 1994). Aspergillus niger also converted globulol (58) <strong>and</strong> epiglobulol (70) to a diol (64) <strong>and</strong><br />
OH<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
H H<br />
OH OH<br />
D. gossypina<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
B. megaterium<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
H H<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
64<br />
65 66<br />
H<br />
58<br />
B. megaterium<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
H H H<br />
OH<br />
67 68<br />
69<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
A. niger<br />
G. cingulata<br />
Cephalosporium aphidicola<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
58<br />
FIGURE 15.26 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> globulol (58) by various microorganisms.<br />
64
756 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
three 13-hydroxylated globulol (71, 72, 74) <strong>and</strong> 4a-hydroxylated product (73). The epimerization at<br />
C4 is very rare example (Hayashi et al., 1998).<br />
Ledol (75), an epimer at C1 <strong>of</strong> globulol was incubated with Glomerella cingulata to afford C13<br />
carboxylic acid (76) (Miyazawa et al., 1994) (Figure 15.27).<br />
Squamulosone (77), aromadendr-1(10)-en-9-one isolated from Hyptis verticillata (Labiatae), was<br />
reduced chemically to give 78–82, which were incubated with the fungus Curvularia lunata in two<br />
different growth media (Figure 15.28).<br />
From 78, two metabolites 80 <strong>and</strong> 83 were obtained. Compound 79 <strong>and</strong> 80 were metabolized to<br />
give ketone 81 as the sole product <strong>and</strong> 78 <strong>and</strong> 83, respectively. From compound 81, two metabolites,<br />
79 <strong>and</strong> 84 were obtained (Figure 15.29). From the metabolite <strong>of</strong> the substrate (82), five products<br />
(84–88) were isolated (Collins, Reynold, <strong>and</strong> Reese, 2002) (Figure 15.30).<br />
Squamulosone (77) was treated in the fungus Mucor plumbeus ATCC 4740 to give not only<br />
cyclopentanol derivatives (89, 90) but also C12 hydroxylated products (91–93) (Collins, Ruddock,<br />
et al., 2002) (Figure 15.31).<br />
Spathulenol (94), which is found in many essential oils, was fed by Aspergillus niger to give a<br />
diol (95) (Higuchi et al., 2001). Ent-10b-hydroxycyclocolorenone (96) <strong>and</strong> myli-4(15)-en-9-one<br />
(96a) isolated from the liverwort Mylia taylorii were incubated with Aspergillus niger IFO 4407 to<br />
give C10 epimeric product (97) (Hayashi et al., 1999) <strong>and</strong> 12-hydroxylated product (96b), respectively<br />
(Nozaki et al., 1996) (Figures 15.32 <strong>and</strong> 15.33).<br />
H HO<br />
C. aphidicola<br />
H HO<br />
A. niger<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
70<br />
71<br />
A. niger<br />
H HO<br />
H HO<br />
H HO<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
72 73 74<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
G. cingulata<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
H<br />
75<br />
H<br />
FIGURE 15.27 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 10-epi-glubulol (70) <strong>and</strong> ledol (75) by Cephalosporium aphidicola,<br />
Aspergillus niger, <strong>and</strong> Glomerella cingulata.<br />
CHO<br />
H<br />
76<br />
COOH
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 757<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
77<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
78<br />
H<br />
80<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
C. lunata in growth medium 1<br />
C. lunata in growth medium 2<br />
H<br />
83<br />
FIGURE 15.28 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> aromadendra-9-one (80) by Curvularia lunata.<br />
(+)-ent-Cyclocolorenone (98) [a] D - 405° (c = 8.8, EtOH), one <strong>of</strong> the major compounds isolated<br />
from the liverwort Plagiochila sciophila (Asakawa, 1982, 1995), was treated by Aspergillus niger to<br />
afford three metabolites, 9-hydroxycyclocolorenone (99, 15.9%) 12-hydroxy-(+)-cyclocolorenone<br />
(100, 8.9%) <strong>and</strong> a unique cyclopropane-cleaved metabolite, 6b-hydroxy-4,11-guaiadien-3-one<br />
(101, 35.9%), <strong>and</strong> 6b,7b-dihydroxy-4,11-guaiadien-3-one (102, trace), <strong>of</strong> which 101 was the major<br />
component. The enantiomer (103) [a] D + 402° (c = 8.8, EtOH) <strong>of</strong> 98 isolated from Solidago altissima<br />
was biotransformed by the same organism to give 13-hydroxycycolorenone (103a, 65.5%), the<br />
enantiomer <strong>of</strong> 100, 1b,13-dihydroxycyclocolorenone (103b, 5.0%), <strong>and</strong> its C11-epimer (103c)<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
79<br />
H<br />
81<br />
H<br />
O<br />
C. lunata in growth medium 1<br />
C. lunata in growth medium 2<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
84<br />
FIGURE 15.29 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 10-epi-aromadendra-9-one (81) by Curvularia lunata.
758 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH OH<br />
HO HO<br />
OH OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
H H H<br />
C. lunata<br />
85<br />
86<br />
87<br />
82<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
88<br />
89<br />
FIGURE 15.30 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> aromadendr-1(10),9-diene (82) by Curvularia lunata.<br />
(Furusawa et al., 2005b, 2006a). It is noteworthy that no cyclopropane-cleaved compounds from 103<br />
have been detected in the crude metabolites even in GC-MS analysis (Figure 15.34).<br />
Plagiochiline A (104) that shows potent insect antifeedant, cytotoxicity, <strong>and</strong> piscidal activity are<br />
very pungent 2,3-secoaromadendrane sesquiterpenoids having 1,1-dimethyl cyclopropane ring,<br />
isolated from the liverwort Plagiochila fruticosa. Plagiochilide (105) is the major component <strong>of</strong> this<br />
liverwort. In order to get more pungent component, the lactone (105, 101 mg) was incubated with<br />
O<br />
H<br />
M. plumbeus<br />
77<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
89<br />
90<br />
91<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
92<br />
93<br />
FIGURE 15.31 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> squamulosone (77) by Mucor plumbeus.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 759<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
A. niger<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
94 95<br />
FIGURE 15.32 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> spathulenol (94) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
Aspergillus niger to give two metabolites 106 (32.5%) <strong>and</strong> 107 (9.7%). Compound 105 was incubated<br />
in Aspergillus niger including 1-aminobenzotriazole, the inhibitor <strong>of</strong> CYP450, to produce<br />
only 106, since this enzyme plays an important role in the formation <strong>of</strong> carboxylic acid (107) from<br />
primary alcohol (106). Unfortunately, two metabolites show nothing hot taste (Hashimoto et al.,<br />
2003c; Furusawa et al., 2006) (Figure 15.35).<br />
Partheniol, 8a-hydroxybicyclogermacrene (108) isolated from Parthenium argentatum ×<br />
Parthe nium Tometosa, was cultured in the media <strong>of</strong> Mucor circinelloides ATCC 15242 to afford<br />
six metabolites, a humulane (109), three maaliane- (110, 112, 113), an aromadendrane- (111), <strong>and</strong> a<br />
tricylohumulane triol (114), the isomer <strong>of</strong> compound (111). Compounds 110, 111, <strong>and</strong> 114 were<br />
isolated as their acetates (Figure 15.36).<br />
Compounds 110 might originate from the substrate by acidic transannular cyclization since the<br />
broth was pH 6.4 just before extraction (Maatooq, 2002).<br />
H<br />
A. niger<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
94 95<br />
O<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
A. niger<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
96 97<br />
H<br />
O<br />
A. niger<br />
H<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
96a<br />
96b<br />
FIGURE 15.33 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> spathulenol (94), ent-10b-hydroxycyclocolorenone (96) <strong>and</strong> myli-4-<br />
(15)-en-9-one (96a) by Aspergillus niger.
760 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
H<br />
9<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
H<br />
9<br />
6 7<br />
A. niger<br />
99 (15.9%)<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
(+)-Cyclocolorenone (98)<br />
from Plagiochila sciophila<br />
O<br />
6 7<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
100<br />
6 7<br />
HO<br />
101 (35.9%)<br />
O<br />
6 7<br />
HO<br />
102<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
O<br />
A. niger<br />
O<br />
O<br />
1<br />
O<br />
(–)-Cyclocolorenone (103)<br />
from Solidago altissima<br />
103a (65.5%)<br />
OH<br />
103b (5.0%)<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
103c<br />
FIGURE 15.34 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-cyclocolorenone (98) <strong>and</strong> (-)-cyclocolorenone (103) by Aspergillus<br />
niger.<br />
Ac O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
Ac O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
104<br />
A. niger<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
A. niger<br />
1-aminobenzotriazole<br />
H<br />
105<br />
106<br />
OH<br />
Cyp-450<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
Cyp-450<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
HOOC<br />
OHC<br />
107<br />
FIGURE 15.35 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> plagiochiline C (104) by Aspergillus niger.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 761<br />
OAc<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
M. circinelloides<br />
HO<br />
109 110<br />
HO<br />
111<br />
108<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
112<br />
113<br />
114<br />
FIGURE 15.36 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 8a-hydroxybicyclogermacrene (108) by Mucor circinelloides.<br />
The same substrate (108) was incubated with the fungus Calonectria decora to afford six new<br />
metabolites (108a–108f). In these reactions, hydroxylation, epoxidation, <strong>and</strong> trans-annular cyclization<br />
were evidenced (Maatooq, 2002b) (Figure 15.37).<br />
ent-Maaliane-type sesquiterpene alcohol, 1a-hydroxymaaliene (115), isolated from the liverwort<br />
Mylia taylorii, was treated in Aspergillus niger to afford two primary alcohols (116, 117)<br />
(Morikawa et al., 2000). Such an oxidation pattern <strong>of</strong> 1,1-dimethyl group on the cyclopropane ring<br />
has been found in aromadendrane series as described above, <strong>and</strong> mammalian biotransformation <strong>of</strong><br />
a monoterpene hydrocarbon, D 3 -carene (Ishida et al., 1981) (Figure 15.38).<br />
9(15)-Africanene (117a), a tricyclic sesquiterpene hydrocarbon isolated from marine s<strong>of</strong>t corals<br />
<strong>of</strong> Simularia species, was biotransformed by Aspergillus niger <strong>and</strong> Rhizopus oryzae for 8 days<br />
to give 10a-hydroxy- (117b) <strong>and</strong> 9a,15-epoxy derivative (117c) (Venkateswarlu et al., 1999)<br />
(Figure 15.39).<br />
Germacrone (118), (+)-germacrone-4,5-epoxide (119), <strong>and</strong> curdione (120) isolated from Curcuma<br />
aromatica, which has been used as crude drug, was incubated with Aspergillus niger. From compound<br />
119 (700 mg), two naturally occurring metabolites, zedoarondiol (121) <strong>and</strong> isozedoarondiol<br />
(122), were obtained (Takahashi, 1994). Compound (119) was cultured in callus <strong>of</strong> Curcuma zedoaria<br />
<strong>and</strong> Curcuma aromatica to give the same secondary metabolites 121, 122, <strong>and</strong> 124 (Sakui<br />
et al., 1988) (Figures 15.40 <strong>and</strong> 15.41).<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
108<br />
OH<br />
Calonectria decora<br />
108a 108b 108c<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
108d 108e 108f<br />
FIGURE 15.37 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 8a-hydroxybicyclogermacrene (108) by Calonectria decora.
762 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH OH O<br />
A. niger<br />
H H H<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
115 116 117<br />
FIGURE 15.38 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1a-hydroxymaaliene (115) Aspergillus niger.<br />
H<br />
A. niger<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
R. oryzae<br />
H<br />
H<br />
117a<br />
117b<br />
117c<br />
FIGURE 15.39 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 9(15)-africanene (117a) by Aspergillus niger <strong>and</strong> Rhizopus oryzae.<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
A. niger<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
121<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
118<br />
119<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
122<br />
HO<br />
123<br />
FIGURE 15.40 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> germacrone (118) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
O<br />
Curcumazedoaria <strong>and</strong><br />
C. aromatica cells<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
118<br />
119<br />
122<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
FIGURE 15.41 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> germacrone (118) by Curcuma zedoaria <strong>and</strong> Curcuma aromatica cells.<br />
123
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 763<br />
O<br />
C. blakesleeana<br />
O<br />
p-TsOH<br />
O<br />
118<br />
O<br />
119<br />
C. zedoaria<br />
OH<br />
124<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
121<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
H<br />
122<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
129<br />
O<br />
C. zedoaria<br />
O<br />
C. zedoaria<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
118<br />
O<br />
125<br />
FIGURE 15.42 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> germacrone (118) by Cunninghamella blakeseeana <strong>and</strong> Curcuma<br />
zedoaria cells.<br />
126<br />
Aspergillus niger biotransformed germacrone (118, 3g) to very unstable 3b-hydroxygermacrone<br />
(123), <strong>and</strong> 4,5-epoxygermacrone (119) which was further converted to two guaiane sesquiterpenoids<br />
(121) <strong>and</strong> (122) through trans-annular-type reaction (Takahashi, 1994). The same substrate was<br />
incubated in the microorganism, Cunninghamella blakeseeana to afford germacrone-4,5-epoxide<br />
(119) (Hikino et al., 1971) while the treatment <strong>of</strong> 118 in the callus <strong>of</strong> Curcuma zedoaria gave four<br />
metabolites 121, 122, 125, <strong>and</strong> 126 (Sakamoto et al., 1994) (Figure 15.42).<br />
The same substrate (118) was treated in plant cell cultures <strong>of</strong> Solidago altissima (Asteraceae) for<br />
10 days to give various hydroxylated products (121, 127, 125, 128–132) (Sakamoto et al., 1994).<br />
Guaiane (121) underwent further rearrangement C4–C5, cleavage <strong>and</strong> C5–C10 trans-annular cyclization<br />
to the bicyclic hydroxyketone (128) <strong>and</strong> diketone (129) (Sakamoto et al., 1994) (Figure 15.43).<br />
Curdione (120) was also treated in Aspergillus niger to afford two allylic alcohols (133, 134) <strong>and</strong><br />
a spirolactone (135). Curcuma aromatica <strong>and</strong> Curcuma wenyujin produced spirolactone (135)<br />
which might be formed from curdione via trans-annular reaction in vivo was biotransformed to<br />
spirolactone diol (135) (Asakawa et al., 1991; Sakui et al., 1992) (Figure 15.44).<br />
Aspergillus niger also converted shiromodiol diacetate (136) isolated from Neolitsea sericea to<br />
2b-hydroxy derivative (137) (Nozaki et al., 1996) (Figure 15.45).<br />
Twenty strains <strong>of</strong> filamentous fungi <strong>and</strong> four species <strong>of</strong> bacteria were screened initially by thin<br />
layer chromatography (TLC) for their biotransformation capacity <strong>of</strong> curdione (120). Mucor spinosus,<br />
Mucor polymorphosporus, Cunninghamella elegans, <strong>and</strong> Penicillium janthinellum were found to<br />
be able to biotransform curdione (120) to more polar metabolites. Incubation <strong>of</strong> curdione with<br />
Mucor spinosus, which was most potent strain to produce metabolites, for 4 days using potato<br />
medium gave five metabolites (134, 134a–134d) among which compounds 134c <strong>and</strong> 134d are new<br />
products (Ma et al., 2006) (Figure 15.46).<br />
Many eudesmane-type sesquiterpenoids have been biotransformed by several fungi <strong>and</strong> various<br />
oxygenated metabolites obtained.<br />
b-Selinene (138) is ubiquitous sesquiterpene hydrocarbon <strong>of</strong> seed oil from many species <strong>of</strong><br />
Apiaceae family; for example, Cryptotenia canadensis var. japonica, which is widely used as<br />
vegetable for Japanese soup. b-Selinene was biotransformed by plant pathogenic fungus Glomerella
764 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
118<br />
Cell culture<br />
(Solidago altissima)<br />
OH –<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H + 127<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
121<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
R<br />
130<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H + OH – 131<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H 2 O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
128: R=OH<br />
129: R=O<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
132<br />
126<br />
FIGURE 15.43 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> germacrone (118) by Solidago altissima cells.<br />
cingulata to give an epimeric mixtures (1:1) <strong>of</strong> 1b,11,12-trihydroxy product (139) (Miyazawa<br />
et al., 1997a). The same substrate was treated in Aspergillus wentii to give 2a,11,12-trihydroxy<br />
derivative (140) (Takahashi et al., 2007).<br />
Eudesm-11(13)-en-4,12-diol (141) was biotransformed by Aspergillus niger to give 3b-hydroxy<br />
derivative (142) (Hayashi et al., 1999).<br />
a-Cyperone (143) was fed by Collectotrichum phomoides (Lamare <strong>and</strong> Furstoss, 1990) to afford<br />
11,12-diol (144) <strong>and</strong> 12-manool (145) (Higuchi et al., 2001) (Figure 15.47).<br />
The filamentous fungi Gliocladium roseum <strong>and</strong> Exserohilum halodes were used as the bioreactors<br />
for 4b-hydroxyeudesmane-1,6-dione (146) isolated from Sideritis varoi subsp. cuatrecasasii. The<br />
former fungus transformed 146 to 7a-hydroxyl- (147), 11-hydroxy- (148), 7a,11-dihydroxy- (149),<br />
1a,11-dihydroxy- (150), <strong>and</strong> 1a,8a-dihydroxy derivatives (151) while Exserohilum halodes gave<br />
only 1a-hydoxy product (152) (Garcia-Granados et al., 2001) (Figure 15.48).<br />
O<br />
A. niger<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
120<br />
O<br />
133<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
134<br />
H<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
–H + O O<br />
H 2<br />
O O O<br />
135<br />
FIGURE 15.44 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> curdione (120) by Aspergillus niger.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 765<br />
O<br />
OAc<br />
OAc<br />
A. niger<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
OAc<br />
OAc<br />
136 137<br />
FIGURE 15.45 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> shiromodiol diacetate (136) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
Orabi (2000) reported that Beauvaria bassiana is the most efficient microorganism to metabolize<br />
plectanthone (152a) among 20 microorganisms, such as Absidia glauca, Aspergillus fl avipes,<br />
Beauvaria bassiana, Cladosporium resinae, Penicillium frequentans, <strong>and</strong> so on. The substrate<br />
(152a) was incubated with Beauvaria bassiana to give metabolites 152b (2.1%), 152c (21.2%), 152d<br />
(2.5%), 152e (no data), <strong>and</strong> 152f (1%) (Figure 15.49).<br />
(-)-a-Eudesmol (153) isolated from the liverwort Porella stephaniana was treated by Aspergillus<br />
cellulosae <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus niger to give 2-hydroxy (154) <strong>and</strong> 2-oxo derivatives (155), among which<br />
the latter product was predominantly obtained. This bioconversion was completely blocked by 1-aminobenzotriazole,<br />
CYP450 inhibitor. Compound 155 has been known as natural product, isolated from<br />
Pterocarpus santalinus (Noma et al., 1996). Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> a-eudesmol (153) isolated from the<br />
dried Atractylodes lancea was reinvestigated by Aspergillus niger to give 2-oxo-11,12-dihydro-aeudesmol<br />
(156) together with 2-hydroxy- (154), <strong>and</strong> 2-oxo-a-eudesmol (155). b-Eudesmol (157) was<br />
treated in Aspergillus niger, with the same culture medium to afford 2a- (158) <strong>and</strong> 2b-hydroxy-aeudesmol<br />
(159) <strong>and</strong> 2a,11,12-trihydroxy-b-eudesmol (160) <strong>and</strong> 2-oxo derivative (161), which was<br />
further isomerized to compound 162 (Noma et al., 1996, 1997) (Figure 15.50).<br />
Three new hydroxylated metabolites (157b–157d) along with a known 158 <strong>and</strong> (157e–157g)<br />
were isolated from the biotransformation reaction <strong>of</strong> a mixture <strong>of</strong> b- (157) <strong>and</strong> g-eudesmols (157a)<br />
by Gibberella suabinetii. The metabolites proved a super activity <strong>of</strong> the hydroxylase, dehydrogenase,<br />
<strong>and</strong> isomerase enzymes. The hydroxylation is a common feature; on the contrary, cyclopropyl<br />
ring formation like compound (158d) is very rare (Maatooq, 2002a) (Figure 15.51).<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
134a<br />
134b<br />
O<br />
M. spinosus<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
120<br />
134 134c<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
134d<br />
FIGURE 15.46 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> curdione (120) by Mucor spinosus.
766 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
138<br />
G. cingulata<br />
H H O<br />
H<br />
139<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
A. wentii<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
H<br />
138 140<br />
A. niger<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
141<br />
142<br />
C. phomoides<br />
O O O<br />
OH<br />
143 144<br />
OH<br />
145<br />
FIGURE 15.47 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> eudesmenes (138, 141, 143) by Aspergillus wentii, Glomerella cingulata,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Collectotrium phomoides.<br />
A furanosesquiterpene, atractylon (163) obtained from Atractylodis rhizoma was treated with<br />
the same fungus to yield atractylenolide III (164) possessing inhibition <strong>of</strong> increased vascular permeability<br />
in mice induced by acetic acid (Hashimoto et al., 2001).<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
R 1<br />
HO<br />
Gliocladium roseum<br />
O<br />
146<br />
Exserohilum halodes<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
R 4<br />
R 2<br />
R 3<br />
147: R 1<br />
=O, R 2<br />
=OH, R 3<br />
=R 4<br />
=H<br />
148: R 1<br />
=O, R 2<br />
=R 4<br />
=H, R 3<br />
=OH<br />
149: R 1<br />
=O, R 2<br />
=R 3<br />
=OH, R 4<br />
=H<br />
150: R 1<br />
=αOH, βH,R 2<br />
=R 4<br />
=H, R 3<br />
=OH<br />
151: R 1<br />
=αOH, βH,R 2<br />
=R 3<br />
=H, R 4<br />
=OH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
152<br />
FIGURE 15.48 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 4b-hydroxy-eudesmane-1,6-dione (146) by Gliocladium roseum <strong>and</strong><br />
Exserohilum halodes.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 767<br />
OAc<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
OAc<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
OAc<br />
152b<br />
152c<br />
O<br />
OAc<br />
B. bassiana<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OAc<br />
H<br />
OAc<br />
H<br />
OAc<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
152a<br />
152d<br />
152e<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
H<br />
OAc<br />
HO<br />
152f<br />
FIGURE 15.49 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> eudesmenone (152a) by Beauvaria bassiana.<br />
The biotransformation <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpene lactones have been carried out by using different<br />
microorganisms.<br />
Costunolide (165), a very unstable sesquiterpene g-lactone, from Saussurea radix, was treated in<br />
Aspergillus niger to produce three dihydrocostunolides (166–168) (Clark <strong>and</strong> Hufford, 1979).<br />
Costunolide is easily converted into eudesmanolides (169–172) in diluted acid, thus 166–168 might<br />
be biotransformed after being cyclized in the medium including the microorganisms. If the crude<br />
A. niger HO<br />
A. cellulosae<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
H OH<br />
H<br />
153 154 155<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
H<br />
156<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
A. niger<br />
HO HO<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
H OH<br />
H<br />
OH H<br />
157 159 158 160<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H OH<br />
H<br />
161 162<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
156<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 15.50 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> a-eudesmol (153) <strong>and</strong> b-eudesmol (157) by Aspergillus niger <strong>and</strong><br />
Aspergillus cellulosae.
768 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
G. suabinetii<br />
H<br />
157b<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
157c<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
157<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
157d<br />
158<br />
G. suabinetii<br />
HO<br />
157e<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
157f<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
157a<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 15.51 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> b-eudesmol (157) <strong>and</strong> g-eudesmol (157a) by Gibberella suabinetii.<br />
157g<br />
drug including costunolide (165) is orally administered, 165 will be easily converted into 169–172<br />
by stomach juice (Figure 15.52).<br />
(+)-Costunolide (165), (+)-cnicin (172a), <strong>and</strong> (+)-salonitgenolide (172b) were incubated with<br />
Cunninghamella echinulata <strong>and</strong> Rhizopus oryzae.<br />
The former fungus converted compound 165, to four metabolites, (+)-11b,13-dihydrocostunolide<br />
(165a), 1b-hydroxyeudesmanolide, (+)-santamarine (166a), (+)-reynosin (166b), <strong>and</strong> (+)-1b-hydroxyarbusculin<br />
A (168a), which might be formed from 1b,10a-epoxide (166c). Treatment <strong>of</strong> 172a with<br />
Cunninghamella echinulata gave (+)-salonitenolide (172b) (Barrero et al., 1999) (Figure 15.53).<br />
a-Cyclocostunolide (169), b-cyclocostunolide (170), <strong>and</strong> g-cyclocostunolide (171) prepared from<br />
costunolide were cultivated in Aspergillus niger, respectively. From the metabolite <strong>of</strong> 169, four<br />
dihydro lactones (173–176) were obtained, among which sulfur-containing compound (176) was<br />
predominant (Figure 15.54).<br />
The same substrate (169) was cultivated for 3 days by Aspergillus cellulosae to afford a sole<br />
metabolite, 11b,13-dihydro-a-cyclocostunolide (177). Possible metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong> 169 by both<br />
microorganisms were shown in Figure 15.55.<br />
A double bond at C11–C13 <strong>of</strong> 169 was firstly reduced stereoselectively to afford 177, followed by<br />
oxidation at C2 to give 173, <strong>and</strong> then further oxidation occurred to furnish two hydroxyl derivatives<br />
(174, 175) in Aspergillus niger. The sulfide compound (176) might be formed from 175 or by Michel<br />
condensation <strong>of</strong> ethyl 2-hydroxy-3-mercaptopropanate, which might originate from Czapek-peptone<br />
medium into exomethylene group <strong>of</strong> a-cyclocostunolide (Hashimoto et al., 1999a, 2001).
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 769<br />
O<br />
A. niger<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
163 164<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
A. niger<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
165 166 167 168<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
169<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
170 171 172<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 15.52 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> atractylon (163) <strong>and</strong> costunolide (165) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
Aspergillus niger converted b-cyclocostunolide (170) to 2-oxygenated metabolites (173, 174,<br />
178–181) <strong>of</strong> which 173 was predominant. It is suggested that compound 173 <strong>and</strong> 174 might be formed<br />
during biotransformation period since metabolite media after 7 days was acidic (pH 2.7). Surprisingly,<br />
Aspergillus cellulose gave a sole 11b,13-dihydro-b-cyclocostunolide (182), which was abnormally<br />
folded in the mycelium <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus cellulosae as a crystal form after biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 170. On<br />
the other h<strong>and</strong>, the metabolites were normally liberated in medium outside <strong>of</strong> the mycelium <strong>of</strong><br />
Aspergillus niger <strong>and</strong> Botryosphaeria dothidea (Hashimoto et al., 1999a, 2001) (Figure 15.56).<br />
Botryosphaeria dothidea has no stereoselectivity to reduce C11–C13 double bond <strong>of</strong> b-cyclocostunolide<br />
(170) since this organism gave two dihydro derivatives 182 (16.7%) <strong>and</strong> 183 (37.8%), respectively,<br />
as shown in Figure 15.57.<br />
It is noteworthy that both a- <strong>and</strong> b-cyclocostunolides were biotransformed by Aspergillus niger<br />
to give the sulfur-containing metabolites (176, 181). Possible biogenetic pathway <strong>of</strong> 170 is shown in<br />
Figure 15.58.<br />
When g-cyclocostunolide (171) was cultivated in Aspergillus niger to give dihydro-a-santonin<br />
(187, 25%) <strong>and</strong> its related C11,C13 dihydro derivatives (184–186, 188, 189) were obtained as a small<br />
amount. Compound 186 was recultivated for 2 days by the same organism as mentioned above to<br />
afford 187 (25%) <strong>and</strong> 5b-hydroxy-a-cyclocostunolide (189, 54%). Recultivation <strong>of</strong> 185 for 2 days by<br />
Aspergillus niger afforded compound 187 as a sole metabolite. During the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 171,<br />
no sulfur-containing product was obtained. Both Aspergillus cellulosae <strong>and</strong> Botryosphaeria<br />
dothidea produced only dihydro-g-cyclocostunolide (184) from the substrate (171) (Hashimoto<br />
et al., 1999a, 2001) (Figure 15.59).<br />
Santonin (190) has been used as vermicide against round warm. Cunninghamella blakesleeana<br />
<strong>and</strong> Aspergillus niger converted 190–187 (Atta-ur Rahman et al., 1998). When 187 was fed by<br />
Aspergillus niger for one week to give 2b-hydroxy-1,2-dihydro-a-santonin (188, 39%) as well as<br />
1b-hydroxy-1,2-dihydro-a-santonin (195, 6.5%), 9b-hydroxy-1,2-dihydro-a-santonin (196, 6.9%),<br />
<strong>and</strong> a-santonin (190, 5.4%), which might be obtained from dehyroxylation <strong>of</strong> 188, as a minor
770 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
Cunninghamella<br />
echinulata<br />
165a<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
166a<br />
O<br />
165<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
O<br />
166b<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
168a<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
166c<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
C. echinulata<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
172a<br />
O<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 15.53 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> costunolide (165) <strong>and</strong> its derivative (172a) by Cunninghamella<br />
vechinulata <strong>and</strong> Rhizopus oryzae.<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
172b<br />
O<br />
component (Hashimoto et al., 2001). Compound 188 was isolated from the crude metabolite <strong>of</strong><br />
g-cyclocostunolide (171) by Aspergillus niger as mentioned above (Figure 15.60).<br />
It was treated with Aspergillus niger for 7 days to give 191 (18.3%), 192 (2.3%), 193 (19.3%), <strong>and</strong><br />
194 (3.5%) <strong>of</strong> which 193 was the major metabolite. Compound 191 was isolated from dog’s urine<br />
after the oral administration <strong>of</strong> 190. The structure <strong>of</strong> compound 194 was established as lumisantonin<br />
obtained by the photoreaction <strong>of</strong> 190. a-Santonin 190 was not converted into 1,2-dihydro<br />
derivative by Aspergillus niger, whereas the other strain <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus niger gave a single product,<br />
1,2-dihydro-a-santonin (187) (Hashimoto et al., 2001) (Figure 15.61).<br />
Ata <strong>and</strong> Nachtigall (2004) reported that a-santonin (190) was incubated with Rhizopus stolonifer<br />
to give (187a), <strong>and</strong> (183b), while with Cunninghamella bainieri, Cunninghamella echinulata, <strong>and</strong><br />
Mucor plumbeus to afford the known 1,2-dihydro-a-santonin (187) (Figure 15.62).<br />
a-Santonin (190) <strong>and</strong> 6-epi-a-santonin (198) were cultivated in Absidia coerulea for 2 days to<br />
give 11b-hydroxy- (191, 71.4%) <strong>and</strong> 8a-hydroxysantonin (197, 2.0%), while 6-epi-santonin (198)<br />
afforded four major products (199–201, 206) <strong>and</strong> four minor analogues (202, 203–205). Asparagus<br />
<strong>of</strong>fi cinalis also biotransformed a-santonin (190) into three eudesmanolides (187, 207, 208) <strong>and</strong> a<br />
guaianolide (209) in a small amount. 6-Epi-santonin (198) was also treated in the same bioreactor
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 771<br />
1<br />
2<br />
A. cellulosae<br />
H<br />
13 3 days<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
169 O<br />
177<br />
O<br />
A. niger<br />
3 days<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
O<br />
173<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
174<br />
O<br />
O<br />
2<br />
H<br />
O<br />
175<br />
O<br />
O<br />
13<br />
OH<br />
2<br />
H<br />
O<br />
176<br />
O<br />
COOEt<br />
13<br />
CH 2 -S-CH 2 -CH<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 15.54 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> a-cyclocostunolide (169) by Aspergillus niger <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus<br />
cellulosae.<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
2 1<br />
H<br />
O<br />
174<br />
O<br />
2<br />
13<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
169 O<br />
177<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
173<br />
O<br />
HS-CH 2 -CH-COOEt<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
2<br />
H<br />
O<br />
176<br />
O<br />
13<br />
CH 2 -S-CH 2 -CH-COOEt<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
A. niger<br />
A. cellulosae<br />
2<br />
H<br />
175<br />
O<br />
O<br />
13<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 15.55 Possible pathway <strong>of</strong> biotransformation <strong>of</strong> a-cyclocostunolide (169) by Aspergillus niger <strong>and</strong><br />
Aspergillus cellulosae.
772 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
2 1 13<br />
H<br />
O<br />
170<br />
O<br />
A. niger (7 days)<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
2<br />
O<br />
1<br />
HO<br />
2<br />
H<br />
173<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
174<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
178<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
2<br />
H O<br />
O<br />
179<br />
H<br />
180<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
2<br />
H<br />
181<br />
O<br />
O<br />
13<br />
CH 2 -S-CH 2 -CH-COOEt<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 15.56 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> b-cyclocostunolide (170) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
NOE<br />
FIGURE 15.57<br />
dothidea.<br />
6<br />
7<br />
H 11 13<br />
O<br />
170 O<br />
H 7 H<br />
H<br />
6<br />
H 11<br />
O<br />
13<br />
182 O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
183<br />
B. dothidea (16.7%)<br />
A. cellulosae (78.0%)<br />
NaBH 4 /EtOAc (76.8%)<br />
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> b-cyclocostunolide (170) by Aspergillus cellulosae <strong>and</strong> Botryosphaeria<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
NOE<br />
B.dothidea (37.8%)<br />
A.cellulosae (0.0%)<br />
NaBH 4 /EtOAc (1.2%)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 773<br />
2 1 4<br />
H<br />
11 13<br />
O<br />
170 O<br />
HO<br />
2<br />
H<br />
O<br />
181<br />
O<br />
13<br />
CH 2 -S-CH 2 -CH-COOEt<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
2<br />
H<br />
O<br />
180<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
2<br />
HO<br />
2 1 OH<br />
H<br />
11<br />
O<br />
182 O<br />
13<br />
H<br />
O<br />
178<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
179<br />
O<br />
A. niger<br />
A. cellulosae<br />
O<br />
4<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
2<br />
4<br />
H<br />
O<br />
173<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
1<br />
H<br />
O<br />
174<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 15.58 Possible pathway <strong>of</strong> biotransformation <strong>of</strong> b-cyclocostunolide (170) by Aspergillus niger <strong>and</strong><br />
Aspergillus cellulosae.<br />
HO<br />
3<br />
5<br />
185<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
2<br />
O<br />
O 188<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
171 O<br />
184<br />
O<br />
11<br />
O<br />
13<br />
O<br />
3<br />
O<br />
187<br />
O<br />
A. niger<br />
A. cellulosae<br />
B. dothidea<br />
HO<br />
3<br />
186<br />
O<br />
O<br />
5<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
189<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 15.59 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> g-cyclocostunolide (171) by Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus cellulosae,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Botryosphaeria dothidea.
774 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
A. niger<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
187<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O 188<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O 195<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
196 O<br />
FIGURE 15.60 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> dihydro-a-santonin (187) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
as mentioned above to give 199 <strong>and</strong> 206, the latter <strong>of</strong> which was obtained as a major metabolite<br />
(44.7%) (Yang et al., 2003) (Figure 15.63).<br />
a-Santonin (190) was incubated in the cultured cells <strong>of</strong> Nicotiana tabacum <strong>and</strong> the liverwort<br />
Marchantia polymorpha. Nicotiana tabacum cells gave 1,2-dihydro-a-santonin (187) (50%) for<br />
6 days. The latter cells also converted a-santonin to 1,2-dihydro-a-santonin, but conversion ratio<br />
was only 28% (Matsushima et al., 2004) (Figure 15.64).<br />
6-Epi-a-santonin (198) <strong>and</strong> its tetrahydro analogue (210) were also incubated with fungus<br />
Rhizopus nigricans to give 2a-hydroxydihydro-a-santonin (211) (Amate et al., 1991), the epimer <strong>of</strong><br />
188 obtained from the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> dihydro-a-santonin (187) by Aspergillus niger<br />
(Hashimoto et al., 2001). The product 211 might be formed via 1,2-epoxide <strong>of</strong> 198. Compound 210<br />
was converted through carbonyl reduction to furnish 212 <strong>and</strong> 213 under epimerization at C4 (Amate<br />
et al., 1991) (Figure 15.65).<br />
OH –<br />
10<br />
9<br />
OH<br />
10 9 11<br />
O<br />
4<br />
O<br />
190<br />
O<br />
13<br />
H + O<br />
HO 4<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
193<br />
O<br />
O<br />
191<br />
O<br />
11<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
A. niger<br />
Dog<br />
O<br />
192<br />
FIGURE 15.61 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> a-santonin (190) by Aspergillus niger <strong>and</strong> dogs.<br />
O<br />
O<br />
13<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
194<br />
O
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 775<br />
b,c,d<br />
O<br />
O<br />
187<br />
O<br />
O<br />
190<br />
O<br />
O<br />
a<br />
O<br />
O<br />
187a<br />
O<br />
a: Rhizopus stolonifera<br />
b: Cunninghamella bainieri<br />
c : Cunninghamella echinulata<br />
d: Mucor plumbeus<br />
FIGURE 15.62 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> a-santonin (190) by Rhizopus stolonifera, Cunninghamella bainieri,<br />
Cunninghamella echinulata, <strong>and</strong> Mucor plumbeus.<br />
1,2,4b,5a-Tetrahydro-a-santonin (214) prepared from a-santonin (190) was treated with<br />
Aspergillus niger to afford six metabolites (215–220) <strong>of</strong> which 219 was the major product (21%).<br />
When the substrate (214) was treated with CYP450 inhibitor, 1-aminobenzotriazole, only 215 was<br />
obtained without its homologues, 216–220, while the C4 epimer (221) <strong>of</strong> 214 was converted by the<br />
same microorganism to afford a single metabolite (222) (73%). Further oxidation <strong>of</strong> 222 did not<br />
occur. This reason might be considered by the steric hindrance <strong>of</strong> b (axial) methyl group at C4<br />
(Hashimoto et al., 2001) (Figure 15.66).<br />
7a-Hydroxyfrullanolide (223) possessing cytotoxicity <strong>and</strong> antitumor activity, isolated from<br />
Sphaeranthus indicus (Asteraceae), was bioconverted by Aspergillus niger to afford 13R-dihydro<br />
OH<br />
a<br />
O<br />
187b<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
198<br />
O<br />
Absidia coerulea<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
199<br />
(13.4%)<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
200<br />
(11.0%)<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
201<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
202<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
205<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
203<br />
O<br />
O<br />
204<br />
O<br />
O<br />
206<br />
CO 2 H<br />
OH<br />
Asparagus <strong>of</strong>ficinalis<br />
O<br />
198<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
199<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
206<br />
(44.7%)<br />
CO 2 H<br />
FIGURE 15.63 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> a-epi-santonin (198) by Absidia coerulea <strong>and</strong> Asparagus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis.
776 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
190<br />
O<br />
O<br />
Absidia coerulea<br />
O<br />
O<br />
191<br />
(71.4%)<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
197<br />
(2.0%)<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
Asparagus <strong>of</strong>ficinalis<br />
O<br />
O<br />
190 O<br />
Marchantia polymorpha cell<br />
Nicotiana tabacum<br />
O<br />
187<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
207<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
187<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
FIGURE 15.64 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 6-epi-a-santonin (190) by Absidia coerulea, Asparagus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis,<br />
Marchantia polymorpha, <strong>and</strong> Nicotiana tabacum.<br />
208<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
209<br />
O<br />
O<br />
derivative (224). The same substrate was also treated in Aspergillus quardilatus (wild type) to give<br />
13-acetyl product (225) (Atta-ur Rahman et al., 1994) (Figure 15.67).<br />
Incubation <strong>of</strong> (-)-frullanolide (226), obtained from the European liverwort, Frullania tamarisci<br />
subsp. tamarisci causes a potent allergenic contact dermatitis, was incubated by Aspergillus niger<br />
to give dihydr<strong>of</strong>rullanolide (227), nonallergenic compound in 31.8% yield. In this case, C11–C13<br />
dihydro derivative was not obtained (Hashimoto et al., 2005).<br />
O<br />
1<br />
2<br />
4<br />
3<br />
198<br />
O<br />
O<br />
R. nigricans<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
2 1 4<br />
O<br />
211<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
R. nigricans<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
H H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
210<br />
O<br />
O<br />
212: (4S)<br />
213: (4R)<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 15.65 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> a-episantonin (198) <strong>and</strong> tetrahydrosantonin (210) by Rhizopus<br />
nigricans.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 777<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
1<br />
2 1<br />
3<br />
4<br />
3<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
O<br />
214<br />
O<br />
216<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
1<br />
3<br />
H<br />
217<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
215<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
2<br />
3<br />
H<br />
218<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
2<br />
3<br />
H<br />
219<br />
O<br />
O<br />
A. niger<br />
A. niger +<br />
Cytochrome<br />
P-450 inhibitor<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
3 2<br />
4<br />
H<br />
220<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
2<br />
3<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 15.66 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 1,2,4b,5a-tetrahydro-a-santonin (214) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
Guaiane-type sesquiterpene hydrocarbon, (+)-g-gurjunene, (228) was treated in plant pathogenic<br />
fungus Glomerella cingulata to give two diols, (1S,4S,7R,10R)-5-guaien-11,13-diol (229), <strong>and</strong><br />
(1S,4S,7R,10S)-5-guaien-10,11,13-triol (230) (Miyazawa et al., 1997, 1998) (Figure 15.68).<br />
Glomerella cingulata converted guaiol (231) <strong>and</strong> bulnesol (232) to 5,10-dihydroxy (233) <strong>and</strong><br />
15-hydroxy derivative (234), respectively (Miyazawa et al., 1996) (Figure 15.69).<br />
When Eurotium rubrum was used as the bioreactor <strong>of</strong> guaiene (235), rotunodone (236) was<br />
obtained (Sugawara <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 2004). Guaiol (231) was also transformed by Aspergillus niger<br />
to give a cylopentane derivative, pancherione (237) <strong>and</strong> two dihydroxy guaiols (238, 239) (Morikawa<br />
et al., 2000), <strong>of</strong> which 237 was obtained from the same substrate using Eurotium rubrum for 10 days<br />
(Sugawara <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 2004; Miyazawa <strong>and</strong> Sugawara, 2006) (Figure 15.70).<br />
Parthenolide (240), a germacrane-type lactone, isolated from the European feverfew (Tanacetum<br />
parthenium) as a major constituent shows cytotoxic, antimicrobial, <strong>and</strong> antifungal, anti-inflammatory,<br />
antirheumatic activity, apoptosis inducing, <strong>and</strong> NF-kB <strong>and</strong> DNA binding inhibitory activity.<br />
This substrate was incubated with Aspergillus niger in Czapek-peptone medium for 2 days to give<br />
six metabolites (241, 12.3%, 242, 11.3%, 243, 13.7%, 244, 5.0%, 245, 9.6%, 246, 5.1%) (Hashimoto<br />
et al., 2005) (Figure 15.71). Compound 244 was a naturally occurring lactone from Michelia champaca<br />
(Jacobsson et al., 1995). The stereostructure <strong>of</strong> compound 243 was established by x-ray crystallographic<br />
analysis.<br />
When parthenolide (240) was treated in Aspergillus cellulosae for 5 days, two new metabolites,<br />
11b,13-dihydro-(247, 43.5%) <strong>and</strong> 11a,13-dihydroparthenolides (248, 1.6%) were obtained together<br />
with the same metabolites (241, 5.3%, 243, 11.2%, 245, 10.4%) as described above (Figure 15.72).<br />
Possible metabolic root <strong>of</strong> 240 has been shown in Figure 15.73 (Hashimoto et al., 2005).<br />
Galal et al. (1999) reported that Streptomyces fulvissimus or Rhizopus nigricans converted<br />
parthenolide (240) into 11a-methylparthenolide (247) in 20–30% yield while metabolite 11bhydroxyparthenolide<br />
(248) was obtained by incubation <strong>of</strong> 240 with Rhizopus nigricans <strong>and</strong>
778 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
3<br />
H<br />
O<br />
221<br />
O<br />
A. niger<br />
3 days HO<br />
3 4<br />
H<br />
O<br />
222<br />
O<br />
4<br />
A. niger<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
223<br />
O<br />
O<br />
224<br />
O<br />
O<br />
A. quardilatus<br />
225<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
A. niger<br />
226<br />
O<br />
O 227<br />
O<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 15.67 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> C4-epimer (221) <strong>of</strong> 214, 7a-hydroxyfrullanolide (223), <strong>and</strong> frullanolide<br />
(226) by Aspergillus niger <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus quardilatus.<br />
Rhodotorula rubra. In addition to the metabolite 247, Streptomyces fulvissimus gave minor polar<br />
metabolite, 9b-hydroxy derivative (248a) in low yield (3%). The same metabolite (248a) was<br />
obtained from 247 by fermentation <strong>of</strong> Streptomyces fulvissimus as a minor constituent. Furthermore,<br />
14-hydroxyparthenolide (248b) was obtained from 240 <strong>and</strong> 247 as a minor component (4%) by<br />
Rhizopus nigricans (Figure 15.74).<br />
Pyrethrosin (248c), a germacranolide, was treated in the fungus Rhizopus nigricans to afford five<br />
metabolites (248d–248h). Pyrethrosin itself <strong>and</strong> metabolite 248e displayed cytotoxic activity<br />
against human malignant melanoma with IC 50 4.20 <strong>and</strong> 7.5 mg/mL, respectively. Metabolite 248h<br />
showed significant in vitro cytotoxic activity against human epidermoid carcinoma (KB cells) <strong>and</strong><br />
against human ovary carcinoma with IC 50 < 1.1 <strong>and</strong> 8.0 mg/mL, respectively. Compounds 248f <strong>and</strong><br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
A. niger<br />
228 229<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
230<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 15.68 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-g-gurjunene (228) by Glomerella cingulata.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 779<br />
G. cingulata<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
231 233<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
G. cingulata<br />
H<br />
232<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
234<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 15.69 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> guaiol (221) <strong>and</strong> bulnesol (232) by Glomerella cingulata.<br />
248i were active against Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans with IC 50 35.0 <strong>and</strong> 25 mg/mL, respectively while<br />
248a <strong>and</strong> 248g showed antifungal activity against C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans with IC 50 30 <strong>and</strong> 10 mg/mL.<br />
Metabolites 248g <strong>and</strong> its acetate (248i), derived from 248g showed antiprotozoal activity against<br />
Plasmodium falciparum with IC 50 0.88 <strong>and</strong> 0.32 mg/mL, respectively without significant toxicity.<br />
Compound 248i also exhibited pronounced activity against the chloroquine-registant strain <strong>of</strong><br />
Plasmodium falciparum with IC 50 0.38 mg/mL (Galal, 2001) (Figure 15.75).<br />
(-)-Dehydrocostuslactone (249), inhibitors <strong>of</strong> nitric oxide synthases <strong>and</strong> TNF-a, isolated from<br />
Saussurea radix, was incubated with Cunninghamella echinulata to afford (+)-11a,13-dihydrodehydrocostuslactone<br />
(250a). The epoxide (251) <strong>and</strong> a C11 reduced compound (250) were obtained<br />
by the above microorganisms (Galal, 2001).<br />
Eurotium rubrum<br />
O<br />
235<br />
236<br />
O<br />
Eurotium rubrum<br />
A. niger<br />
231<br />
OH<br />
A. niger<br />
237<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
238<br />
FIGURE 15.70 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> guaiene (235) by Eurotium rubrum <strong>and</strong> guaiol (231) by Aspergillus<br />
niger <strong>and</strong> Eurotium rubrum.<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
239<br />
OH
780 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
10<br />
5<br />
4<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
Parthenolide (240)<br />
A. niger<br />
3 days<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
241<br />
(12.3%)<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
242<br />
(11.3%)<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
243<br />
(13.7%)<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
244<br />
(5.0%)<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
245<br />
(9.6%)<br />
O<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
246<br />
(5.1%)<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 15.71 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> parthenolide (240) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
Cunninghamella echinulata <strong>and</strong> Rhizopus oryzae bioconverted 249 into C11/C13 dihydrogenated<br />
(250) <strong>and</strong> C10/C14 epoxidated product (251). Treatment <strong>of</strong> 252a in Cunninghamella echinulata<br />
<strong>and</strong> Rhizopus oryzae gave (-)-16-(1-methyl-1-propenyl) eremantholide (252b) (Galal, 2001)<br />
(Figure 15.76).<br />
The same substrate (249) was fed by Aspergillus niger for 7 days to afford four metabolites<br />
costuslactone (250), <strong>and</strong> their derivatives (251–253), <strong>of</strong> which 251 was the major product (28%)<br />
while the same substrate was cultivated with Aspergillus niger for 10 days, two minor metabolites<br />
(254, 255) were newly obtained in addition to 252 <strong>and</strong> 253 <strong>of</strong> which the latter lactone was predominant<br />
(20.7%) (Hashimoto et al., 2001) (Figure 15.77).<br />
When compound (249) was treated with Aspergillus niger in the presence <strong>of</strong> 1-aminobenzotriazole,<br />
249 was completely converted into 11b,13-dihydro derivative (250) for 3 days; however, further<br />
biodegradation did not occur for 10 days (Hashimoto et al., 1999, 2001). The same substrate (249)<br />
was cultivated with Aspergillus cellulosae IFO to furnish 11,13-dihydro- (250) (82%) for only one<br />
day <strong>and</strong> then the product (250) slowly oxidized into 11,13-dihydro-8b-hydroxycostuslactone (256)<br />
(1.6%) from 8 days (Hashimoto et al., 1999, 2001) (Figure 15.78).<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
Parthenolide (240)<br />
A. cellulosae<br />
5 days<br />
H<br />
OH O<br />
241<br />
(5.3%)<br />
FIGURE 15.72 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> parthenolide (240) by Aspergillus cellulosae.<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
247<br />
(43.4%)<br />
O<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
243<br />
(11.2%)<br />
O<br />
O<br />
248<br />
(1.6%)<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
OH O<br />
245 O<br />
(10.4%)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 781<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
[H]<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
–H 2 O<br />
H<br />
H 2 O<br />
10<br />
5<br />
4 O 11 13<br />
O<br />
H +<br />
O<br />
Parthenolide (240)<br />
A. niger<br />
A. niger<br />
H<br />
OH O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
246<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
HO O<br />
O<br />
244<br />
Michampanolide<br />
[H]<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
245<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
10<br />
4 5<br />
H<br />
HO O<br />
243<br />
O<br />
13<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
241<br />
FIGURE 15.73 Possible pathway <strong>of</strong> biotransformation <strong>of</strong> parthenolide (240).<br />
a<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
247 O<br />
248<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
b<br />
O<br />
240<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
247 O<br />
248a<br />
O<br />
c<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
248b<br />
O<br />
a<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
247<br />
O<br />
O<br />
b<br />
O<br />
O<br />
248b<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
a: Rhizopus nigricans<br />
b: Streptomyces fulvissimus<br />
c: Rhodotorula rubra<br />
O<br />
O<br />
248a<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 15.74 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> parthenolide (240) <strong>and</strong> its dihydro derivative (247) by Rhizopus<br />
nigricans, Streptomyces fulvissimus, <strong>and</strong> Rhodotorula rubra.
782 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
R. nigricans<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
OAc<br />
248d<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
248e<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OAc<br />
248c<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
248f<br />
HO<br />
OAc<br />
H<br />
OAc<br />
248g<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OAc<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
OAc<br />
248h<br />
248i<br />
FIGURE 15.75 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> pyrethrosin (248c) by Rhizopus nigricans.<br />
a<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
250a<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
249<br />
O<br />
b<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
a: Cunninghamella echinulata<br />
b: Rhizopus oryzae<br />
H<br />
O<br />
250<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
251<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
a,b<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
252a<br />
a: Cunninghamella echinulata<br />
b: Rhizopus oryzae<br />
252b<br />
FIGURE 15.76 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-dehydrocostuslactone (249) <strong>and</strong> rearranged guaianolide (252a) by<br />
Cunninghamella echinulata <strong>and</strong> Rhizopus oryzae.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 783<br />
3<br />
H<br />
10<br />
14<br />
H<br />
O<br />
11 13<br />
249<br />
O<br />
A. niger<br />
7 days<br />
A. niger<br />
10 days<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
3<br />
H<br />
14 OH<br />
H OH<br />
10<br />
H<br />
O<br />
11 13<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
250<br />
O 252<br />
O 254<br />
O<br />
H<br />
14<br />
O<br />
10<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
14<br />
10<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
3<br />
H<br />
O<br />
10<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
251<br />
O<br />
253<br />
O<br />
255<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 15.77 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-dehydrocostuslactone (249) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
The lactone (249) was biodegraded by the plant pathogen Botryosphaeria dothidea for 4 days to<br />
give the metabolites (250) (37.8%) <strong>and</strong> 257 (8.6%) while Aspergillus niger IFO-04049 (4 days) <strong>and</strong><br />
Aspergillus cellulosae for 1 day gave only 250. Thus Botryosphaeria dothidea demonstrated low<br />
stereoselectivity to reduce C11–C13 double bond (Hashimoto et al., 2001). Furthermore three<br />
Aspergillus species, Aspergillus niger IFO 4034, Aspergillus awamori IFO 4033, <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus<br />
terreus IFO6123 were used as bioreactors for compounds 249. Aspergillus niger IFO 4034 gave<br />
three products (250–252), <strong>of</strong> which 252 was predominant (56% in GC-MS). Aspergillus awamori<br />
IFO 4033 <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus terreus IFO 6123 converted 249 to give 250 (56% from Aspergillus<br />
awamori, 43% from Aspergillus terreus) <strong>and</strong> 252 (43% from Aspergillus awamori, 57% from<br />
Aspergillus terreus), respectively (Hashimoto et al., 2001) (Figure 15.79).<br />
Vernonia arborea (Asteraceae) contains zaluzanin D (258) in high content. Ten microorganisms<br />
were used for the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> compound 258. Botrytis cinerea converted 258 into 259 <strong>and</strong><br />
260 (85:15%) <strong>and</strong> Fusarium equiseti gave 259 <strong>and</strong> 260 (33:66%). Curvularia lunata, Colletotrichum<br />
lindemuthianum, Alternaria alternate, <strong>and</strong> Phyllosticta capsici produced 259 as the sole metabolite<br />
in good yield while Sclerotinia sclerotiorumn <strong>and</strong> Rhizpctonia solani gave deactyl product (261) as<br />
a sole product, <strong>and</strong> 260, 262–264 among which 263 <strong>and</strong> 264 are the major products, respectively.<br />
Reduction <strong>of</strong> C11–C13 exocylic double bond is the common transformation <strong>of</strong> a-methylene g-butyrolactone<br />
(Kumari et al., 2003) (Figure 15.80).
784 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
14<br />
H<br />
10<br />
3<br />
8<br />
4<br />
6 7<br />
H 11 13<br />
O<br />
249<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
3<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
252<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
3<br />
14<br />
H O<br />
10<br />
H<br />
O<br />
255 O<br />
H<br />
14<br />
O<br />
10<br />
14 OH<br />
H OH<br />
10<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
250<br />
11 13<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
14<br />
O<br />
10<br />
254 O<br />
OH<br />
H 14 OH<br />
10<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
8 OH<br />
H<br />
O<br />
251 O<br />
A. niger<br />
A. niger + Cyt.-P450 inhibitor<br />
H<br />
O<br />
253<br />
O<br />
256<br />
O<br />
A. cellulosae<br />
FIGURE 15.78 Possible pathway <strong>of</strong> biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-dehydrocostuslactone (249) by Aspergillus<br />
niger <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus cellulosae.<br />
14<br />
H<br />
H O<br />
10<br />
14<br />
A. niger<br />
H<br />
A. cellulosae<br />
13<br />
H<br />
H<br />
10<br />
A. awamori<br />
A. terreus<br />
O 11<br />
O<br />
Botryosphaeria dothidea<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
250<br />
251<br />
11 13<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
249<br />
HO 3<br />
13<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O 11<br />
O<br />
O<br />
252<br />
257<br />
FIGURE 15.79 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-dehydrocostuslactone (249) by Aspergillus species <strong>and</strong><br />
Botryosphaeria dothidea.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 785<br />
H<br />
H<br />
AcO<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
259<br />
O 260<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
B. cinerea<br />
F. equiseti<br />
C. lunata<br />
C. lindemuthianum<br />
B. theobromae<br />
F. oxysporum<br />
A. alternata<br />
P. capsici<br />
AcO<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
258<br />
O<br />
S. sclerotiorum<br />
H<br />
O<br />
261<br />
O<br />
R. solani<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
262<br />
263<br />
264<br />
FIGURE 15.80 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> zaluzanin D (258) by various fungi.<br />
260<br />
O<br />
Incubation <strong>of</strong> parthenin (264a) with the fungus Beauveria bassiana in modified Richard’s<br />
medium gave C11–C13 reduced product (264b) in 37% yield, while C11 a-hydroxylated product<br />
(264c) was obtained in 32% yield from the broth <strong>of</strong> the fungus Sporotrichum pulverulentum using<br />
the same medium (Bhutani <strong>and</strong> Thakur, 1991) (Figure 15.81).<br />
Cadina-4,10(15)-dien-3-one (265) possessing insecticidal <strong>and</strong> ascaricidal activity, from Jamaican<br />
medicinal plant Hyptis verticillata was metabolized by Curvularia lunata ATCC 12017 in potato<br />
dextrose to give its 12-hydoxy- (266), 3a-hydroxycadina-4,10(15)-dien (267), <strong>and</strong> 3a-hydroxy-4,5-<br />
dihydrocadinenes (268) while 265 was incubated by the same fungus in peptone, yeast, <strong>and</strong> beef<br />
extracts <strong>and</strong> glucose medium, only 267 <strong>and</strong> 268 were obtained. Compound 267 derived synthetically<br />
was treated in the same fungus Curvularia lunata to afford three metabolites (269–271)<br />
(Collins <strong>and</strong> Reese, 2002) (Figure 15.82).<br />
HO HO HO<br />
S. pulverulentum<br />
B. bassiana<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
264c<br />
O<br />
264a<br />
O<br />
264b<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 15.81 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> parthenin (264a) by Sporotrichum pulverulentum <strong>and</strong> Beauveria<br />
bassiana.
786 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
H<br />
C. lunata<br />
O<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
265 266<br />
OH<br />
267 268<br />
C. lunata<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
269<br />
270<br />
271<br />
FIGURE 15.82 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> cadina-4,10(15)-dien-3-one (265) by Curvularia lunata.<br />
The incubation <strong>of</strong> the same substrate (265) in Mucor plumbeus ATCC 4740 in high iron-rich<br />
medium gave 270, which was obtained from Curvularia lunata mentioned above, 268, 272, 273,<br />
277, 278, <strong>and</strong> 279. In low iron medium, this fungus converted the same substrate 265 into three<br />
epoxides (274–276), a tetraol (280) with common metabolites (268, 273, 277, 278), <strong>and</strong> 271, which<br />
was the same metabolite used by Curvularia lunata (Collins, Reynold, <strong>and</strong> Reese, 2002). It is interesting<br />
to note that only epoxides were obtained from the substrate (265) by Mucor fungus in low<br />
iron medium (Figure 15.83).<br />
The same substrate (265) was incubated with the deuteromycete fungus, Beauveria bassiana,<br />
which is responsible for the muscaridine disease in insects, in order to obtain new functionalized<br />
analogues with improved biological activity. From compound 265, nine metabolites were obtained.<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
M. plumbeus<br />
H<br />
R 1 R 2<br />
R 1 R 2<br />
270: R 1 =H, R 2 =OH 272: R 1 =OH, R 2 =OH<br />
271a: R 1 =OH, R 2 =H 273: R 1 =H, R 2 =OH<br />
R 1 R 2<br />
274: R 1 =OH, R 2 =OH<br />
275: R 1 =H, R 2 =OH<br />
H<br />
265<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
276<br />
R 1 R 2<br />
268: R 1 =R 2 =H<br />
277: R 1 =OH, R 2 =H<br />
278: R 1 =H, R 2 =OH<br />
OH<br />
279<br />
FIGURE 15.83 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> cadina-4,10(15)-dien-3-one (265) by Mucor plumbeus.<br />
280<br />
OH
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 787<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
H<br />
B. bassiana<br />
HO<br />
268a 268b<br />
OH<br />
273<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
265<br />
267<br />
268<br />
268c<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
268d<br />
268e<br />
268f<br />
FIGURE 15.84 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> cadina-4,10(15)-dien-3-one (265) by Beauveria bassiana.<br />
The insecticidal potential <strong>of</strong> the metabolites (267, 268, 268a–268f) were evaluated against Cylas<br />
formicarius. The metabolites (273, 268, 268d) showed enhanced activity compared with the substrate<br />
(265). The plant growth regulatory activity <strong>of</strong> the metabolites against radish seeds was tested.<br />
All the compounds showed inhibitory activity; however, their activity was less than colchicine<br />
(Buchanan et al., 2000) (Figure 15.84).<br />
Cadinane-type sesquiterpene alcohol (281) isolated from the liverwort Mylia taylorii gave a<br />
primary alcohol (282) by Aspergillus niger treatment (Morikawa et al., 2000) (Figure 15.85).<br />
Fermentation <strong>of</strong> (-)-a-bisabolol (282a) possessing anti-inflammatory activity with plant pathogenic<br />
fungus Glomerella cingulata for 7 days yielded oxygenated products (282b–282e) <strong>of</strong> which<br />
compound 282e was predominant. 3,4-Dihydroxy products (282b, 282d, 282e) could be formed by<br />
hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> the 3,4-epoxide from 282a <strong>and</strong> 282c (Miyazawa et al., 1995b) (Figure 15.86).<br />
El Sayed et al. (2002) reported microbial <strong>and</strong> chemical transformation <strong>of</strong> (S)-(+)-curcuphenol<br />
(282g) <strong>and</strong> curcudiol (282n), isolated from the marine sponges, Didiscus axeata. Incubation <strong>of</strong><br />
compound 282g with Kluyveromyces marxianus var. lactis resulted in the isolation <strong>of</strong> six metabolites<br />
(3–8, 282h–282j). The same substrate was incubated with Aspergillus alliaceus to give the<br />
metabolites (282p, 282q, 282s) (Figure 15.87).<br />
Compounds 282g <strong>and</strong> 282n were treated in Rhizopus arrhizus <strong>and</strong> Rhodotorula glutinus for<br />
6 <strong>and</strong> 8 days to afford glucosylated metabolites, 1a-d-glucosides (282o) <strong>and</strong> 282r, respectively. The<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
A. niger<br />
OH<br />
281<br />
282<br />
FIGURE 15.85 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> cadinol (281) by Aspergillus niger.
788 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
HO<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
G. cingulata<br />
282b<br />
282c<br />
OH<br />
282a<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
O<br />
282d<br />
OH<br />
282e<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 15.86 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> b-bisabolol (282a) by Glomerella cingulata.<br />
substrate itself showed antimicrobial activity against C<strong>and</strong>ia albicans, Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans,<br />
<strong>and</strong> MRSA-resistant Staphylococcus aureus <strong>and</strong> Staphylococcus aureus with MIC <strong>and</strong> MFC/MBC<br />
ranges <strong>of</strong> 7.5–25 <strong>and</strong> 12.5–50 mg/mL, respectively. Compounds 282g <strong>and</strong> 282h also exhibited in<br />
vitro antimalarial activity against Plasmodium falciparium (D6 clone) <strong>and</strong> Plasmodium falciparium<br />
(W2 clone) <strong>of</strong> 3600 <strong>and</strong> 3800 ng/mL (selective index (S.I.) > 1.3), <strong>and</strong> 1800 (S.I. > 2.6), <strong>and</strong> 2900<br />
(S.I. > 1.6), respectively (El Sayed et al., 2002) (Figure 15.87).<br />
Artemisia annua is one <strong>of</strong> the most important Asteraceae species as antimalarial plant. There are<br />
many reports <strong>of</strong> microbial biotransformation <strong>of</strong> artemisinin (283), which is active antimalarial rearranged<br />
cadinane sesquiterpene endoperoxide, <strong>and</strong> its derivatives to give novel antimalarials with<br />
increased activities or differing pharmacological characteristics.<br />
Lee et al. (1989) reported that deoxoartemisinin (284) <strong>and</strong> its 3a-hydroxy derivative (285) were<br />
obtained from the metabolites <strong>of</strong> artemisinin (283) incubated with Nocardia corallina <strong>and</strong><br />
Penicillium chrysogenum (Figure 15.88).<br />
Zhan et al. (2002) reported that incubation <strong>of</strong> artemisinin (283) with Cunninghamella echinulata<br />
<strong>and</strong> Aspergillus niger for 4 days at 28°C resulted in the isolation <strong>of</strong> two metabolites, 10b-hydroxyartemisinin<br />
(287a) <strong>and</strong> 3a-hydroxydeoxyartemisinin (285), respectively.<br />
Compound 283 was also biotransformed by Aspergillus niger to give four metabolites, deoxyartemisinin<br />
(284, 38%), 3a-hydroxydeoxyartemisinin (285, 15%), <strong>and</strong> two minor products (286, 8%<br />
<strong>and</strong> 287, 5%) (Hashimoto et al., 2003b).<br />
Artemisinin (283) was also bioconverted by Cunninghamella elegans. During this process,<br />
9b-hydroxyartemisinin (287b, 78.6%), 9b-hydroxy-8a-artemisinin (287c, 6.0%), 3a- hydroxydeoxoartemisinin<br />
(285, 5.4%), <strong>and</strong> 10b-hydroxyartemisinin (287d, 6.5%) have been formed. On the basis<br />
<strong>of</strong> quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) <strong>and</strong> molecular modeling investigations, 9bhydoxy<br />
derivatization <strong>of</strong> artemisinin skeleton may yield improvement in antimalarial activity <strong>and</strong><br />
may potentially serve as an efficient means <strong>of</strong> increasing water solubility (Parshikov et al., 2004)<br />
(Figure 15.89).<br />
Albicanal (288) <strong>and</strong> (-)-drimenol (289) are simple drimane sesquiterpenoids isolated from the<br />
liverwort, Diplophyllum serrulatum, <strong>and</strong> many other liverworts <strong>and</strong> higher plants. The latter compound<br />
was incubated with Mucor plumbeus <strong>and</strong> Rhizopus arrhizus. The former microorganism<br />
converted 289 to 6,7a-epoxy- (290), 3b-hydroxy- (291), <strong>and</strong> 6a-drimenol (292) in the yields <strong>of</strong> 2%,<br />
7%, <strong>and</strong> 50%, respectively. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the latter species produced only 3b-hydroxy derivative<br />
(291) in 60% yield (Ar<strong>and</strong>a et al., 1992) (Figure 15.90).<br />
(-)-Polygodial (293) possessing piscicidal, antimicrobial, <strong>and</strong> mosquito-repellant activity is the<br />
major pungent sesquitepene dial isolated from Polygonum hydropiper <strong>and</strong> the liverwort, Porella<br />
vernicosa complex. Polygodial was incubated with Aspergillus niger, however, because <strong>of</strong> its
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 789<br />
OH OH OH<br />
OH<br />
282g<br />
Kluyveromyces marxianus<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH HO<br />
282h 282i 282j<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OGlc<br />
Rhizopus arrhizus<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OHC<br />
HO 2 C<br />
H<br />
H<br />
282k 282l 282m<br />
OH<br />
282o<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
282p<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
Aspergillus alliaceus<br />
O<br />
282n OH<br />
OGlc<br />
Rhodotorula glutinus<br />
OH<br />
282q<br />
OH<br />
282s<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
282r<br />
FIGURE 15.87 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (S)-(+)-curcuphenol (282g) by Kluyveromyces marxianus <strong>and</strong> Rhizopus<br />
arrhizus <strong>and</strong> curcudiol (282n) by Aspergillus alliaceus <strong>and</strong> Rhodotorula glutinus.<br />
antimicrobial activity, nothing metabolite was obtained (Sekita et al., 2005). Polygodiol (295) prepared<br />
from polygodial (293) was also treated in the same manner as described above to afford<br />
3b-hyrdoxy- (297), which was isolated from Marasmius oreades as antimicrobial activity (Ayer <strong>and</strong><br />
Craw, 1989) <strong>and</strong> 6a-hydroxypolygodiol (298) in 66–70% <strong>and</strong> 5–10% yields, respectively (Ar<strong>and</strong>a et<br />
al., 1992). The same metabolite (297) was also obtained from polygodiol (295) as a sole metabolite<br />
from the culture broth <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus niger in Czapek-peptone medium for 3 days in 70.5% yield<br />
(Sekita et al., 2005), while the C9 epimeric product (296) from isopolygodial (294) was incubated<br />
with Mucor plumbeus to afford 3b-hydroxy- (299) <strong>and</strong> 6a-hydroxy derivative (300) in low yields,
790 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
H<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
a,b,c<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
3<br />
4<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
10 9<br />
6<br />
7 8<br />
5<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
284 (38%) 285 (15%)<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O O<br />
O<br />
Artemisinin (283)<br />
a: A.niger<br />
b: Nocardia sp.<br />
c: Penicillium sp.<br />
a<br />
AcO O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
286 (8%)<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
287 (5%)<br />
H<br />
FIGURE 15.88 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> artemisinin (283) by Aspergillus niger, Nocardia corallina, <strong>and</strong><br />
Penicillium chrysogenum.<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
287a<br />
a<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
c<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
283<br />
b<br />
O<br />
287b<br />
O<br />
287c<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
285 a: Cunninghamella echinulata<br />
b: Aspergillusniger<br />
c: Cunningham ellaelegans<br />
285<br />
287d<br />
FIGURE 15.89 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> artemisinin (283) by Cunninghamella echinulata, Cunninghamella<br />
elegans, <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus niger.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 791<br />
CHO<br />
H<br />
288<br />
OH OH OH OH<br />
H<br />
Mucor plumbeus<br />
H<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
289<br />
290<br />
(2%)<br />
Rhizopus arrhizus*<br />
291<br />
(7%)<br />
(60%)*<br />
292<br />
(50%)<br />
FIGURE 15.90 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> drimenol (289) by Mucor plumbeus <strong>and</strong> Rhizopus arrhizus.<br />
7% <strong>and</strong> 13% (Ar<strong>and</strong>a et al., 1992). Drim-9a-hydroxy-11b,12-diacetoxy-7-ene (301) derived from<br />
polygodiol (295) was treated in the same manner as described above to yield its 3b-hydroxy derivative<br />
(302, 42%) (Sekita et al., 2005) (Figures 15.91 <strong>and</strong> 15.92).<br />
Cinnamodial (303) from the Malagasy medicinal plant, Cinnamosma fragrans, was also treated<br />
in the same medium including Aspergillus niger to furnish three metabolites, respectively in very<br />
law yields (304, 2.2%; 305, 0.05%; <strong>and</strong> 306, 0.62%). Compound 305 <strong>and</strong> 306 are naturally occurring<br />
cinnamosmolide, possessing cytotoxicity <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial activity, <strong>and</strong> fragrolide. In this<br />
case, the introduction <strong>of</strong> 3b-hydroxy group was not observed (Sekita et al., 2006) (Figure 15.93).<br />
Naturally occurring rare drimane sesquiterpenoids (307–314) were biosynthesized by the fungus<br />
Cryptoporus volvatus with isocitric acids. Among these compounds, in particular, cryptoporic<br />
acid E (312) possesses antitumor promoter, anticolon cancer, <strong>and</strong> very strong super oxide anion<br />
radical scavenging activities (Asakawa et al., 1992). When the fresh fungus allowed st<strong>and</strong>ing in<br />
moisture condition, olive fungus Paecilomyces varioti grows on the surface <strong>of</strong> the fruit body <strong>of</strong> this<br />
293<br />
CHO<br />
CHO<br />
LiAlH 4<br />
295<br />
OH<br />
M. plumbeus*<br />
OH R. arrhizus*<br />
A. niger**<br />
HO<br />
297<br />
(66–70%)*<br />
(70.5%)**<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
298<br />
(5–10%)*<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
CHO<br />
CHO<br />
OH<br />
OH M. plumbeus<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
294<br />
296<br />
FIGURE 15.91 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> polygodiol (295) by Mucor plumbeus, Rhizopus arrhizus, <strong>and</strong><br />
Aspergillus niger.<br />
HO<br />
299<br />
(7%)<br />
OH<br />
300<br />
(13%)
792 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
OAc<br />
OH<br />
OAc<br />
A. niger<br />
OAc<br />
OH<br />
OAc<br />
3 days<br />
HO<br />
301<br />
302 (47.2%)<br />
FIGURE 15.92 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> drim-9a-hydroxy-11,12-diacetoxy-7-ene (301) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
fungus. 2 kg <strong>of</strong> the fresh fungus was infected by Cryptoporus volvatus for 1 month, followed by the<br />
extraction <strong>of</strong> methanol to give the crude extract, then purification using silica gel <strong>and</strong> Sephadex<br />
LH-20 to give five metabolites (316, 318–321), which were not found in the fresh fungus (Takahashi<br />
et al., 1993a). Compound 318 was also isolated from the liverworts, Bazzania <strong>and</strong> Diplophyllum<br />
species (Asakawa, 1982, 1995) (Figure 15.94).<br />
Liverworts produce a large number <strong>of</strong> enantiomeric mono-, sesqui-, <strong>and</strong> diterpenoids to those<br />
found in higher plants <strong>and</strong> lipophilic aromatic compounds. It is also noteworthy that some liverworts<br />
produce both normal <strong>and</strong> its enantiomers. The more interesting phenomenon in the chemistry<br />
<strong>of</strong> liverworts is that the different species in the same genus, for example, Frullania tamarisci subsp.<br />
tamarisci <strong>and</strong> Frullania dilatata produce totally enantiomeric terpenoids. Various sesqui- <strong>and</strong><br />
diterpenoids, bibenzyls, <strong>and</strong> bisbibenzyls isolated from several liverworts show characteristic<br />
fragrant odor, intensely hot <strong>and</strong> bitter taste, muscle relaxing, antimicrobial, antifungal, allergenic<br />
contact dermatitis, antitumor, insect antifeedant, superoxide anion release inhibitory, piscicidal, <strong>and</strong><br />
neurotrophic activity (Asakawa, 1982, 1990, 1995, 1999, 2007, 2008; Asakawa <strong>and</strong> Ludwiczuk,<br />
2008). In order to obtain the different kind <strong>of</strong> biologically active products <strong>and</strong> to compare the<br />
metabolites <strong>of</strong> both normal <strong>and</strong> enantiomers <strong>of</strong> terpenoids, several secondary metabolites <strong>of</strong> specific<br />
liverworts were biotransformed by Penicillium sclerotiorum, Aspergillus niger, <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus<br />
cellulosae.<br />
(-)-Cuparene (322) <strong>and</strong> (-)-2-hydroxycuparene (323) have been isolated from the liverworts,<br />
Bazzania pompeana <strong>and</strong> Marchantia polymorpha, while its enantiomer (+)-cuparene (324) <strong>and</strong><br />
(+)-2-hydroxycuparene (325) from the higher plant, Biota orientalis <strong>and</strong> the liverwort Jungermannia<br />
rosulans. (R)-(-)-a-Cuparenone (326) <strong>and</strong> grimaldone (327) demonstrate intense flagrance. In<br />
order to obtain such compounds from both cuparene <strong>and</strong> its hydroxy compounds, both enatiomers<br />
mentioned above were cultivated with Aspergillus niger (Hashimoto et al., 2001a) (Figure 15.95).<br />
From (-)-cuparene (322), five metabolites (328–332) all <strong>of</strong> which contained cyclopentanediols or<br />
hydroxycyclopentanones were obtained. An aryl methyl group was also oxidized to give primary<br />
alcohol, which was further oxidized to afford carboxylic acids (329–331) (Hashimoto et al., 2001a)<br />
(Figure 15.96).<br />
From (+)-cuparene, six metabolites (333–338) were obtained. These are structurally very similar<br />
to those found in the metabolites <strong>of</strong> (-)-cuparene, except for the presence <strong>of</strong> an acetonide (336), but<br />
they are not identical. All metabolites possess benzoic acid moiety.<br />
11<br />
CHO<br />
OH<br />
9 CHO<br />
12<br />
6<br />
A. niger<br />
4 days<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
9<br />
6<br />
O<br />
11<br />
12<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
11 O 12<br />
O<br />
9<br />
8<br />
6<br />
OAc<br />
OAc<br />
OAc<br />
O<br />
Cinnamodial (303)<br />
304 (2.2%)<br />
305 (0.05%)<br />
Cinnamosmolide<br />
306 (0.20%)<br />
Fragrolide<br />
FIGURE 15.93 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> cinnamodial (303) by Aspergillus niger.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 793<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
COOMe COOMe COOH<br />
COOMe CO COOH<br />
O<br />
COOMe COOMe COOH<br />
COOMe COOH COOH<br />
H<br />
Cryptoporic acid A<br />
(307)<br />
H<br />
COOH COOR<br />
COOMe<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
Cryptoporic acid B (308)<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
315<br />
O<br />
R=Me Cryptoporic acid C (309)<br />
R=H Cryptoporic acid F (310)<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
COOH COOH COOH<br />
COOH COOH COOH<br />
H 319<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
Albicanol (318)<br />
H<br />
Cryptoporic acid H<br />
(314)<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
316<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
COOMe CO COOH<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
COOH CO COOMe<br />
O<br />
Cryptoporic acid D (311)<br />
H<br />
O<br />
COOH CO COOH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
COOH CO COOH<br />
O<br />
317<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
COOH COOR COOMe<br />
O<br />
COOMe CO COOH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
R=Me Cryptoporic acid E (312)<br />
R=H Cryptoporic acid G (313)<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
COOH<br />
320<br />
OH<br />
H 321<br />
COOH<br />
FIGURE 15.94 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> cryptoporic acids (307–317, 316) by Paecilomyces varioti.<br />
The possible biogenetic pathways <strong>of</strong> (+)-cuparene (324) has been proposed in Figure 15.97.<br />
Unfortunately, none <strong>of</strong> the metabolites show strong mossy odor (Hashimoto et al., 2006). The<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> an acetonide in the metabolites has also been seen in those <strong>of</strong> dehydronootkatone (25)<br />
(Furusawa et al., 2003) (Figure 15.98).<br />
The liverwort Herbertus adancus, Herbertus sakuraii, <strong>and</strong> Mastigophora diclados produce<br />
(-)-herbertene, the C3 methyl isomer <strong>of</strong> cuparene, with its hydroxy derivatives, for example, herbertanediol<br />
(339), which shows NO production inhibitory activity (Harinantenaina et al., 2007) <strong>and</strong><br />
herbertenol (342). Treatment <strong>of</strong> compound (339) in Penicillium sclerotiorum in Czapek-polypeptone<br />
medium gave two dimeric products, mastigophorene A (340) <strong>and</strong> mastigophorene B (341), which<br />
showed neurotrophic activity (Harinantenaina et al., 2005).<br />
When (-)-herbertenol (342) was biotransformed for 1 week by the same fungus, no metabolic<br />
product was obtained; however, five oxygenated metabolites (344–348) were obtained from its<br />
methyl ether (343). The possible metabolic pathway is shown in Figure 15.99. Except for the presence<br />
<strong>of</strong> the ether (348), the metabolites from 342 resemble those found in (-)- <strong>and</strong> (+)-cuparene<br />
(Hashimoto et al., 2006) (Figures 15.100 <strong>and</strong> 15.101).<br />
Maalioxide (349), mp 65–66°, [a] D<br />
21<br />
−34.4°, obtained from the liverwort, Plagiochila sciophila<br />
was inoculated <strong>and</strong> cultivated rotatory (100 rpm) in Czapek-peptone medium (pH 7.0) at 30°C for<br />
2 days. (-)-Maalioxide (349) (100 mg/200 mL) was added to the medium <strong>and</strong> further cultivated for<br />
2 days to afford three metabolites, 1b-hydroxy-(350), 1b,9b-dihydroxy- (351), <strong>and</strong> 1b,12-dihydroxymaalioxides<br />
(352), <strong>of</strong> which 351 was predominant (53.6%). When the same substrate was cultured<br />
with Aspergillus cellulosae in the same medium for 9 days, 7b-hydroxymaalioxide (353) was<br />
obtained as a sole product in 30% yield. The same substrate (349) was also incubated with the<br />
fungus Mucor plumbeus to obtain a new metabolite, 9b-hydroxymaalioxide (354), together with<br />
two known hydroxylated products (350, 353) (Wang et al., 2006).<br />
Maalioxide (349) was oxidized by m-chloroperbenzoic acid to give a very small amount <strong>of</strong><br />
353 (1.2%), together with 2a-hydroxy- (355, 2%) <strong>and</strong> 8a-hydroxymaalioxide (356, 1.5%), which
794 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
(–)-Cuparene (322)<br />
Bazzania pompeana<br />
Marchantia polymorpha<br />
S<br />
(+)-Cuparene (324)<br />
Jungermannia rosulans<br />
Biota orientalis (higher plant)<br />
R<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
(–)–2-Hydroxycuparene (323) (+)–2-Hydroxycuparene (325)<br />
Bazzania pompeana<br />
Marchantia polymorpha<br />
Jungermannia rosulans<br />
Biota orientalis (higher plant)<br />
326<br />
O<br />
O<br />
327<br />
FIGURE 15.95 Naturally occurring cuparene sesquiterpenoids (322–327).<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HOOC<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
328 329<br />
(–)-Cuparene (322)<br />
A. niger<br />
HOOC<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
HOOC<br />
O<br />
330 331<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
332<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 15.96 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-cuparene (322) by Aspergillus niger.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 795<br />
O<br />
HOOC<br />
HOOC<br />
333<br />
334<br />
COOH<br />
O<br />
A. niger<br />
HOOC<br />
O<br />
HOOC<br />
O<br />
(+)-Cuparene (324)<br />
335<br />
OH<br />
336<br />
HO<br />
HOOC<br />
O<br />
HOOC<br />
O<br />
337<br />
338<br />
FIGURE 15.97 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-cuparene (324) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
have not been obtained in the metabolite <strong>of</strong> 349 in Aspergillus niger <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus cellulosae<br />
(Tori et al., 1990) (Figure 15.102).<br />
Plagiochila sciophila is one <strong>of</strong> the most important liverworts, since it produces bicyclohumulenone<br />
(357), which possesses strong mossy note <strong>and</strong> is expected to manufacture compounding<br />
perfume. In order to obtain much more strong scent, 357 was treated in Aspergillus niger for 4 days<br />
to give 4a,10b-dihydroxybicyclohumulenone (358, 27.4%) <strong>and</strong> bicyclohumurenone-12-oic acid<br />
(359). An epoxide (360) prepared by m-chloroperbenzoic acid was further treated in the same<br />
fungus as described above to give 10b-hydoxy derivative (361, 23.4%). Unfortunately, these metabolites<br />
possess only faint mossy odor (Hashimoto et al., 2003c) (Figure 15.103).<br />
The liverwort Reboulia hemisphaerica biosynthesizes cyclomyltaylanoids like 362 <strong>and</strong> also<br />
ent-1a-hydroxy-b-chamigrene (367). Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> cyclomyltaylan-5-ol (362) in the same<br />
15<br />
9<br />
10<br />
[O]<br />
HO<br />
HOOC<br />
O<br />
(+)-Cuparene (324)<br />
[O]<br />
335<br />
–H 2<br />
O<br />
HOOC<br />
O<br />
16<br />
O<br />
HOOC<br />
HOOC<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
336<br />
333<br />
[O]<br />
337<br />
[O]<br />
HOOC<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
[O]<br />
HOOC<br />
[O]<br />
OH<br />
HOOC<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 15.98 Possible pathway <strong>of</strong> biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-cuparene (324) by Aspergillus niger.
796 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
HO OH HO OH<br />
Penicillium sclerotiorum<br />
Mastigophorene A (340)<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
(–)-Herbertenediol (339)<br />
HO OH HO OH<br />
Mastigophorene B (341)<br />
FIGURE 15.99 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-herbertenediol (339) by Penicillium sclerotiorum.<br />
medium including Aspergillus niger gave four metabolites, 9b-hydroxy- (363, 27%), 9b,15-<br />
dihydroxy- (364, 1.7%), 10b-hydroxy- (365, 10.3%), <strong>and</strong> 9b,15-dihydroxy derivative (366, 12.6%).<br />
In this case, the stereospecificity <strong>of</strong> alcohol was observed, but the regiospecificity <strong>of</strong> alcohol moiety<br />
was not seen in this substrate (Furusawa et al., 2005b, 2006b) (Figure 15.104).<br />
The biotransformation <strong>of</strong> spirostructural terpenoids was not carried out. Ent-1a-hydroxy-bchamigrene<br />
(367) was inoculated in the same manner as described above to give three new metabolites<br />
(368–370), <strong>of</strong> which 370 was the major product (46.2% in isolated yield). The hydroxylation <strong>of</strong><br />
vinyl methyl group has been known to be very common in the case <strong>of</strong> microbial <strong>and</strong> mammalian<br />
biotransformation (Furusawa et al., 2005, 2006) (Figure 15.105).<br />
A. niger<br />
No metabolites<br />
OH<br />
(–)–α-Herbertenol (342)<br />
HOOC<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
(Me) 2 SO 4<br />
OMe<br />
O<br />
OMe<br />
OH<br />
HOOC<br />
344(159 mg)<br />
HO<br />
345<br />
A. niger<br />
OMe<br />
(-)-Methoxy-α-herbertene<br />
(343)<br />
1 week<br />
OMe<br />
346<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OMe<br />
347<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
348<br />
FIGURE 15.100 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-methoxy-a-herbertene (343) by Aspergillus niger.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 797<br />
15<br />
OMe<br />
9<br />
13<br />
10<br />
[O]<br />
HO<br />
OMe<br />
[O]<br />
HO<br />
OM e<br />
OH<br />
(-)-Methoxy-α-herbertene<br />
(343)<br />
HO<br />
[O]<br />
347<br />
OH<br />
OMe<br />
345<br />
HOOC<br />
HOOC<br />
[O]<br />
HOOC<br />
HOOC<br />
OH<br />
[O]<br />
O<br />
–CH 3<br />
HOOC<br />
OMe<br />
[O]<br />
10<br />
O<br />
13<br />
OH<br />
[O]<br />
OMe<br />
346<br />
O<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
O<br />
348<br />
OH<br />
OMe<br />
344<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 15.101 Possible pathway <strong>of</strong> biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-methoxy-a-herbertene (343) by Aspergillus<br />
niger.<br />
b-Barbatene (= gymnomitrene) (4), a ubiquitous sesquiterpene hydrocarbon, from liverwort like<br />
Plagiochila sciophila <strong>and</strong> many others. Jungermanniales liverworts was treated in the same manner<br />
using Aspergillus niger for 1 day gave a triol, 4b,9b,10b-trihydoxy-b-barbatene (27, 8%) (Hashimoto<br />
et al., 2003c).<br />
Pinguisane sesquiterpenoids have been isolated from the Jungermanniales, Metzgeriales, <strong>and</strong><br />
Marchantiales. In particular, the Lejeuneaceae <strong>and</strong> Porellaceae are rich sources <strong>of</strong> this unique type<br />
<strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenoids. One <strong>of</strong> the major furanosesquitepene (373) was biodegradated by Aspergillus<br />
niger to afford primary alcohol (375), which might be formed from 374 as shown in Figure 15.106<br />
(Lahlou et al., 2000) (Figure 15.107).<br />
In order to obtain more pharmacologically active compounds, the secondary metabolites from<br />
crude drugs <strong>and</strong> animals, for example, nardosinone (376) isolated from the crude drug, Nardostachys<br />
chinensis, which has been used for headache, stomachache, <strong>and</strong> diuresis possesses antimalarial<br />
activity. Hinesol (384), possessing spasmolytic activity, obtained from Atractylodis lanceae rhizoma,<br />
animal perfume (-)-ambrox (391) from ambergris were biotransformed by Aspergillus niger,<br />
Aspergillus cellulosae, Botryosphaeria dothidea, <strong>and</strong> so on.<br />
Nardosinone (376) was incubated in the same medium including Aspergillus niger as described<br />
above for 1 day to give six metabolites (377, 45%; 378, 3%; 379, 2%; 380, 5%; 381, 6%; <strong>and</strong> 382,<br />
3%). Compounds 380–382 are unique trinorsesquiterpenoids although their yields are very poor.<br />
Compound 380 might be formed by the similar manner to that <strong>of</strong> phenol from cumene (383) (Figure<br />
15.108) (Hashimoto et al., 2003b) (Figure 15.109).
798 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O O O<br />
H<br />
mCPBA<br />
355<br />
(2.0%)<br />
353<br />
(1.2%)<br />
356<br />
(1.5%)<br />
OH OH OH OH<br />
A. niger<br />
H<br />
H H H<br />
O O O O<br />
OH<br />
M. plumbeus<br />
349 350<br />
351 352<br />
(6.2%) (53.6%) (11.0%)<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
A. cellulosae<br />
OH<br />
H H H<br />
O O O<br />
350 353 354<br />
FIGURE 15.102 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> maalioxide (349) by Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus cellulosae, <strong>and</strong><br />
Mucor plumbeus.<br />
From hinesol (384), two allylic alcohols (386, 387) <strong>and</strong> their oxygenated derivative (385), <strong>and</strong><br />
three unique metabolites (388–390) having oxirane ring were obtained. The metabolic pathway is<br />
very similar to that <strong>of</strong> oral administration <strong>of</strong> hinesol since the same metabolites (395–387) were<br />
obtained from the urine <strong>of</strong> rabbits (Hashimoto et al., 1998, 1999b, 2001) (Figure 15.110).<br />
To obtain a large amount <strong>of</strong> ambrox (391), a deterrence, labda-12,14-dien-7a,8-diol obtained<br />
from the liverwort, Porella pettottetiana as a major component, was chemically converted into<br />
O<br />
H<br />
4 2<br />
10<br />
1 12<br />
A. niger<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
H<br />
CO 2 H<br />
357 358<br />
(27.4%)<br />
mCPBA<br />
359<br />
(6.1%)<br />
O<br />
O<br />
360<br />
H<br />
A. niger<br />
FIGURE 15.103 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> bicyclohumulenone (357) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
O<br />
3 2<br />
O<br />
10<br />
361<br />
(23.4%)<br />
H<br />
OH
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 799<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
9<br />
OH<br />
5<br />
9<br />
10<br />
15<br />
A. niger<br />
363 (27.3%)<br />
OH<br />
364 (1.7%)<br />
O<br />
362<br />
5<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
9<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
365 (10.3%)<br />
OH<br />
366 (12.6%)<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 15.104 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> cyclomyltaylan-5-ol (362) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
OH<br />
9<br />
8<br />
1<br />
15<br />
367<br />
A. niger<br />
HO<br />
9<br />
OH<br />
1<br />
8<br />
OH<br />
1<br />
8<br />
OH<br />
1<br />
15<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
368 (4.8%) 369 (25.0%) 370 (46.2%)<br />
FIGURE 15.105 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> ent-1a-hydroxy-b-chamigrene (367) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
H<br />
H<br />
A. niger<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 15.106 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> b-barbatene (371) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
HO<br />
371 372
800 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
–H 2 O +H 2 O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
373<br />
A. niger<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
H +<br />
373a<br />
O<br />
O<br />
373c<br />
H<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
373b<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
OHC<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
374<br />
375<br />
FIGURE 15.107 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> pinguisanol (373) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
(-)-ambrox via six steps in relatively high yield (Hashimoto et al., 1998a). Ambrox was added to<br />
Czapek-peptone medium including Aspergillus niger, for 4 days, followed by chromatography <strong>of</strong> the<br />
crude extract to afford four oxygenated products (392–395), among which the carboxylic acid (393,<br />
52.4%) is the major product (Hashimoto et al., 2001) (Figure 15.111).<br />
O<br />
O<br />
7<br />
OH<br />
6<br />
7<br />
OH<br />
11<br />
OH<br />
11<br />
377 (45%)<br />
378a (3%)<br />
O<br />
6 7<br />
O<br />
O<br />
A. niger<br />
1 day<br />
O<br />
H<br />
10<br />
7<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
6<br />
OH<br />
Nardosinone (376)<br />
379 (2%)<br />
380 (5%)<br />
HO<br />
2<br />
H<br />
O<br />
6 7<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
2<br />
H<br />
O<br />
6 7<br />
O<br />
381<br />
(6%)<br />
FIGURE 15.108 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> nardosinone (376) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
382<br />
(3%)
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 801<br />
O O H OH<br />
H 3 O +<br />
6 7 O 2<br />
O 6<br />
OH –<br />
Cumene (383)<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
11 O<br />
11 O OH<br />
OH<br />
(CH 3 ) 2 CO<br />
Nardosinone (376)<br />
380<br />
FIGURE 15.109 Possible pathway <strong>of</strong> biotransformation <strong>of</strong> nardosinone (376) to trinornardosinone (380) by<br />
Aspergillus niger.<br />
When ambrox (391) was biotransformed by Aspergillus niger for 9 days in the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
1-aminobenzotriazole, an inhibitor <strong>of</strong> CYP450, compounds 396 <strong>and</strong> 397 were obtained instead <strong>of</strong><br />
the metabolites (392–395), which were obtained by incubation <strong>of</strong> ambrox in the absence <strong>of</strong> the<br />
inhibitor. Ambrox was cultivated by Aspergillus cellulosae for 4 days in the same medium to afford<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
Hinesol (384)<br />
A. niger<br />
Rabbit<br />
A. niger<br />
O<br />
O<br />
385<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
388<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
386<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
389<br />
O<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
387<br />
HO<br />
390<br />
FIGURE 15.110 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> hinesol (384) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
O<br />
H<br />
OH
802 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
H<br />
(–)-Ambrox (391)<br />
A. niger<br />
at 30°C for 4 days<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
3<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
392<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
18<br />
COOH<br />
393 (52.4%)<br />
HO<br />
3<br />
H<br />
8<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
394<br />
395<br />
FIGURE 15.111 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-ambrox (391) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
C1 oxygenated products (398 <strong>and</strong> 399), the former <strong>of</strong> which was the major product (41.3%)<br />
(Hashimoto et al., 2001) (Figure 15.112).<br />
The metabolite pathways <strong>of</strong> ambrox are quite different between Aspergillus niger <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus<br />
cellulosae. Oxidation at C1 occurred in Aspergillus cellulosae to afford 398 <strong>and</strong> 399, which was<br />
also afforded by John’s oxidation <strong>of</strong> 398, while oxidation at C3 <strong>and</strong> C18 <strong>and</strong> ether cleavage between<br />
C8 <strong>and</strong> C12 occurred in Aspergillus niger to give 392–395. Ether cleavage seen in Aspergillus niger<br />
is very rare.<br />
Fragrance <strong>of</strong> the metabolites (392–395) <strong>and</strong> 7a-hydroxy-(-)-ambrox (400) <strong>and</strong> 7-oxo-(-)-ambrox<br />
(401) obtained from labdane diterpene diol were estimated. Only 399 demonstrated a similar<br />
odor to ambrox (391) (Hashimoto et al., 2001) (Figure 15.113).<br />
(-)-Ambrox (391) was also microbiotransformed with Fusarium lini to give mono-, di-, <strong>and</strong><br />
trihydroxylated metabolites (401a–401d), while incubation <strong>of</strong> the same substrate with Rhizopus<br />
stolonifera afforded two metabolites (394, 396), which were obtained from 391 by Aspergillus niger<br />
as mentioned above, together with 397 <strong>and</strong> 401e (Choudhary et al., 2004) (Figure 15.114).<br />
The sclareolide (402) which is C12 oxo derivative <strong>of</strong> ambrox was incubated with Mucor plumbeus<br />
to afford three metabolites 3b-hydroxy- (403, 7.9%), 1b-hydroxy- (404, 2.5%), <strong>and</strong> 3-ketosclareolide<br />
(405, 7.9%) (Ar<strong>and</strong>a et al., 1991) (Figure 15.115).<br />
Aspergillus niger in the same medium as mentioned above converted sclareolide (402) into two<br />
new metabolites (406, 407), together with known compounds (403, 405), <strong>of</strong> which 3b-hydroxysclareolide<br />
(403) is preferentially obtained (Hashimoto et al., 2007) (Figure 15.116).<br />
From the metabolites <strong>of</strong> sclareolide (402) incubated with Curvularia lunata <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus<br />
niger, five oxidized compounds, (403, 404, 405, 405a, 405b) were obtained. Fermentation <strong>of</strong> 402<br />
with Gibberella fujikuroii afforded (403, 404, 405, 405a). The metabolites, 403 <strong>and</strong> 405a were
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 803<br />
O<br />
H<br />
(–)-Ambrox<br />
Aspergillus niger<br />
A. niger + 1-Aminobenzotriazole<br />
at 30°C for 4 days<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
396<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
397<br />
392<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
394<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
COOH<br />
393<br />
O<br />
H<br />
395<br />
FIGURE 15.112 Possible pathway <strong>of</strong> biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-ambrox (391) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
formed from the same substrate by the incubation <strong>of</strong> Fusarium lini. No microbial transformation <strong>of</strong><br />
402 was observed with Pleurotus ostreatus (Atta-ur Rahman et al., 1997) (Figure 15.117).<br />
Compound 391 treated in Curvularia lunata gave metabolites 401e <strong>and</strong> 396, while Cunninghamella<br />
elegans yielded compounds 401e <strong>and</strong> 396 <strong>and</strong> (+)-sclareolide (402) (Figure 15.113). The metabolites<br />
(401a–401e, 396) from 391 do not release any effective aroma when compared to 391. Compound<br />
394 showed a strong sweet odor quite different from the amber-like odor (Choudhary et al., 2004).<br />
Sclareolide (402) exhibited phytotoxic <strong>and</strong> cytotoxic activity against several human cancer cell<br />
lines. Cunninghamella elegans gave new oxidized metabolites (403, 404, 405a, 405c, 405d, 405e),<br />
resulting from the enantioselective hydroxylation. Metabolites 403, 404, <strong>and</strong> 405a have been known<br />
as earlier as biotransformed products <strong>of</strong> 402 by many different fungi <strong>and</strong> have shown cytotoxicity<br />
against various human cancer cell lines. The metabolites (403, 404, <strong>and</strong> 405a) indicated significant<br />
phytotoxicity at higher dose against Lemna minior L. (Choudhary et al., 2004) (Figure 15.117).<br />
Ambrox (391) <strong>and</strong> sclareolide (402) were incubated with the fungus Cephalosporium aphidicola for<br />
10 days in shake culture to give 3b-hydroxy- (396), 3b,6b-dihydroxy- (401g), 3b,12-dihydroxy- (401h),
804 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
H<br />
(–)-Ambrox (391)<br />
A. cellulosae<br />
4 days<br />
OH<br />
1<br />
O<br />
CrO 3 - H 2 SO 4<br />
O<br />
1<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
398 (41.3%) 399 (1.6%)<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
O<br />
400<br />
FIGURE 15.113 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-ambrox (391) by Aspergillus cellulosae.<br />
<strong>and</strong> sclareolide 3b,6b-diol (401f), <strong>and</strong> 3b-hydroxy- (403), 3-keto- (405), <strong>and</strong> sclareolide 3b,6b-diol<br />
(401f), respectively (Hanson <strong>and</strong> Truneh, 1996) (Figure 15.118).<br />
Zerumbone (408), which is easily isolated from the wild ginger, Zingiber zerumbet <strong>and</strong> its epoxide<br />
(409) were incubated with Fusarium culmorum <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus niger in Czapek-peptone medium,<br />
respectively. The former fungus gave (1R,2R)-(+)-2,3-dihydrozerumbol (410) stereospecifically via<br />
either 2,3-dihydrozerumbone (408a) or zerumbol (408b) or both <strong>and</strong> accumulated 410 in the mycelium.<br />
The facile production <strong>of</strong> optically active 410 will lead a useful material <strong>of</strong> woody fragrance,<br />
namely 2,3-dihydrozerumbone. Aspergillus niger biotransformed 408 via epoxide (409) to several<br />
metabolites containing zerumbone-6,7-diol as a main product. The same fungus converted the epoxide<br />
(409) into three major metabolites containing (2R,6S,7S,10R,11S)-1-oxo7,9-dihydroxyisodaucane<br />
(413) via dihydro derivatives (411, 412). However, Aspergillus niger biotransformed 409 only into<br />
412 in the presence <strong>of</strong> CYP450 inhibitor, 1-aminobenzotriazole (Noma et al., 2002).<br />
The same substrate was incubated in the Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus orysae, C<strong>and</strong>ia rugosa,<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ia tropicalis, Mucor mucedo, Bacillus subtilis, <strong>and</strong> Schizosaccharomyces pombe; however,<br />
any metabolites have been obtained. All microbes except for the last organism, zerumbone epoxide<br />
(409), prepared by mCPBA, bioconverted into two diastereoisomers, 2R,6S,7S-dihydro- (411) <strong>and</strong><br />
2R,6R,7R-derivative (412), whose ratio was determined by gas chromatography (GC) <strong>and</strong> their<br />
enantio-excess was over 99% (Nishida <strong>and</strong> Kawai, 2007) (Figure 15.119).<br />
Several microorganisms <strong>and</strong> a few mammals (see later) for the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-cedrol<br />
(414) which is widely distributed in the cedar essential oils were used. Plant pathogenic fungus<br />
Glomerella cingulata converted cedrol (414) into three diols (415–417) <strong>and</strong> 2a-hydroxycedrene<br />
(418) (Miyazawa et al., 1995). The same substrate (414) was incubated with Aspergillus niger to give<br />
416 <strong>and</strong> 417 together with a cyclopentanone derivative (419) (Higuchi et al., 2001). Human skin<br />
microbial flora, Staphylococcus epidermidis also converted (+)-cedrol into 2a-hydroxycedrol (415)<br />
(Itsuzaki et al., 2002) (Figure 15.120).<br />
401
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 805<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
a<br />
401a<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
401b<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
391<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
401c<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
401d<br />
c,d<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
O<br />
b<br />
396<br />
394<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
391<br />
O<br />
H<br />
397<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
401e<br />
a: Fusarium lini<br />
b: Rhizopus strolonifera<br />
c: Curvlaria lanata<br />
d: Cunninghamella elegans<br />
c,d<br />
FIGURE 15.114 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-ambrox (391) by Fusarium lini <strong>and</strong> Rhizopus stronifera.<br />
Cephalosporium aphidicola bioconverted cedrol (414) into 417 (Hanson <strong>and</strong> Nasir, 1993). On<br />
the other h<strong>and</strong>, Corynesphora cassiicola produced 419 in addition to 417 (Abraham et al., 1987). It<br />
is noteworthy that Botrytis cinerea that damages many flowers, fruits <strong>and</strong> vegetables biotransformed<br />
cedrol into different metabolites (420–422) from those mentioned above (Aleu et al., 1999).<br />
4a-Hydroxycedrol (424) was obtained from the metabolite <strong>of</strong> cedrol acetate (423) by using<br />
Glomerella cingulata (Matsui et al., 1999) (Figure 15.121).<br />
Patchouli alcohol (425) was treated in Botrytis cinerea to give three metabolites two tertiary<br />
alcohols (426, 427), four secondary alcohols (428, 430, 430a), <strong>and</strong> two primary alcohols (430b,<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
M. plumbeus<br />
O<br />
O<br />
3 H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
18<br />
Sclareolide (402)<br />
403 404 405<br />
FIGURE 15.115 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-sclareolide (402) by Mucor plumbeus.<br />
O<br />
O
806 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
3<br />
18<br />
402<br />
O<br />
A. niger<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
[O]<br />
3 3<br />
O<br />
403<br />
404<br />
O<br />
[O]<br />
[O]<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
3<br />
O<br />
[O]<br />
3<br />
18<br />
O<br />
18<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
406<br />
407<br />
FIGURE 15.116 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-sclareolide (402) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
430c) <strong>of</strong> which compounds 425, 427, <strong>and</strong> 428 are the major metabolites (Aleu et al., 1999) while<br />
plant pathogenic fungus Glomerella cingulata converted the same substrate to 5-hydroxy- (426) <strong>and</strong><br />
5,8-dihydroxy derivative (429) (Figure 15.122).<br />
In order to confirm the formation <strong>of</strong> 429 from 426, the latter product was reincubated in the same<br />
medium including Glomerella cingulata to afford 429 (Miyazawa et al., 1997b) (Figure 15.123).<br />
Patchouli acetate (431) was also treated in the same medium to give 426 <strong>and</strong> 429 (Matsui <strong>and</strong><br />
Miyazawa, 2000). 5-Hydroxy-a-patchoulene (432) was incubated with Glomerella cingulata to<br />
afford 1a-hydroxy derivative (426) (Miyazawa et al., 1998a).<br />
(-)-a-Longipinene (433) was treated with Aspergillus niger to afford 12-hydroxylated product<br />
(434) (Sakata et al., 2007).<br />
Ginsenol (435), which was obtained from the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Panax ginseng, was incubated with<br />
Botrytis cinerea to afford four secondary alcohols (436–439) <strong>and</strong> two cyclohexanone derivatives<br />
(440) from 437 <strong>and</strong> 441 from 438 or 439. Some <strong>of</strong> the oxygenated products were considered as potential<br />
antifungal agents to control Botrytis cinerea (Aleu et al., 1999a) (Figures 15.124 <strong>and</strong> 15.125).<br />
(+)-Isolongifolene-9-one (442), which was isolated from some cedar trees was treated in<br />
Glomerella cingulata for 15 days to afford two primary alcohols (443, 444) <strong>and</strong> a secondary alcohol<br />
(445) (Sakata <strong>and</strong> Miyazawa, 2006) (Figure 15.126).<br />
Choudhary et al. (2005) reported that fermentation <strong>of</strong> (-)-isolongifolol (445a) with Fusarium lini<br />
resulted in the isolation <strong>of</strong> three metabolites, 10-oxo- (445b), 10a-hydroxy- (445c), <strong>and</strong> 9ahydroxyisolngifolol<br />
(445d). Then the same substrate was incubated with Aspergillus niger to yield<br />
the products 445c <strong>and</strong> 445d. Both 445c <strong>and</strong> 445d showed inhibitory activity against<br />
butylcholinesterease enzyme in a concentration-dependent manner with IC 50 13.6 <strong>and</strong> 299.5 mM,<br />
respectively (Figure 15.127).<br />
(+)-Cycloisolongifol-5b-ol (445e) was fermented with Cunninghamella elegans to afford three<br />
oxygenated metabolites: 11-oxo- (445f), 3b-hydroxy- (445g), <strong>and</strong> 3b,11a-dihydroxy derivative<br />
(445h) (Choudhary et al., 2006a). (Figure 15.128).<br />
A daucane-type sesquiterpene derivative, lancerroldiol p-hydroxybenzoate (446) was hydrogenated<br />
with cultured suspension cells <strong>of</strong> the liverwort, Marchantia polymorpha to give 3,4-<br />
dihydrolancerodiol (447) (Hegazy et al., 2005) (Figure 15.129).<br />
Widdrane sesquiterpene alcohol (448) was incubated with Aspergillus niger to give an oxo <strong>and</strong><br />
an oxy derivatives (449, 450) (Hayashi et al., 1999) (Figure 15.130).
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 807<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
405f<br />
O<br />
O<br />
a,b<br />
g<br />
g<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
g<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
d,e,f<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
402 403 404<br />
405<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
a,d,e,f<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
c<br />
405a<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
405b<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
a: Curvularia lunata<br />
b: Mucro plumbeus<br />
c: Cunnighamella elegans<br />
d: Aspergillus niger<br />
e: Gibberella fujikuroii<br />
f: Fusarium lini<br />
(only 403, 405a)<br />
g: Cephalosporium<br />
HO<br />
aphidicola<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
404 405<br />
O<br />
O HO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
405a<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
405c<br />
405d<br />
405e<br />
FIGURE 15.117 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-sclareolide (402) by various fungi.<br />
(-)-b-Caryophyllene (451), one <strong>of</strong> the ubiquitous sesquiterpene hydrocarbons found not only in<br />
higher plants but also in liverworts, was biotransformed by Pseudomonas cruciviae, Diplodia gossypina,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Chaetomium cochlioides (Lamare <strong>and</strong> Furstoss, 1990). Pseudomonas cruciviae gave a<br />
ketoalcohol (452) (Devi, 1979), while the latter two species produced the 14-hydroxy-5,6-epoxide<br />
(454), its carboxylic (455), <strong>and</strong> 3a-hydroxy- (456) <strong>and</strong> norcaryophyllene alcohol (457), all <strong>of</strong> which<br />
might be formed from caryophyllene C5,C6-epoxide (453). Oxidation pattern <strong>of</strong> (-)-b-caryophyllene<br />
by the fungi is very similar to that by mammals (see later) (Figure 15.131).<br />
Fermentation <strong>of</strong> (-)-b-caryophyllene (451) with Diplodia grossypina afforded 14 different<br />
metabolites (453–457j), among which 14-hydroxy-5,6-epoxide (454) <strong>and</strong> the corresponding acid
808 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
a<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
396<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
401g<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
391<br />
a: Cephalosporium aphidocola<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
401h<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
401f<br />
FIGURE 15.118 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-ambrox (391) by Cephalosporium aphidicola.<br />
(455) were the major metabolites. Compound 457j is structurally very rare <strong>and</strong> found in Poronia<br />
punctata. The main reaction path is epoxidation at C5, C6 as mentioned above <strong>and</strong> selective hydroxylation<br />
at C4 (Abraham et al., 1990) (Figure 15.132).<br />
(-)-b-Caryophyllene epoxide (453) was incubated with Cephalosporium aphidicola for 6 days<br />
to afford two metabolites (457l, 457m) while Macrophomina phaseolina biotransformed the same<br />
substrate to 14- (454) <strong>and</strong> 15-hydroxy derivatives (457k). The same substrate was treated in<br />
Aspergillus niger, Gibberella fujikuroii, <strong>and</strong> Rhizopus stolonifera, for 8 days <strong>and</strong> Fusarium lini for<br />
10 days to afford the metabolites 457n, 457o, 457p <strong>and</strong> 457q, <strong>and</strong> 457r, respectively. All metabolites<br />
were estimated for butyrylcholine esterase inhibitory activity <strong>and</strong> compound 457k was found to<br />
show potency similar activity to galanthamine HBr (IC 50 10.9 versus 8.5 mM) (Choudhary<br />
et al., 2006) (Figure 15.133).<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
1 2<br />
10<br />
9<br />
aa<br />
3<br />
7 6<br />
408a<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
410<br />
b<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
H<br />
408<br />
O<br />
mPCBA<br />
408b<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
409<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
411<br />
b + 1-aminobenzotriazole<br />
413<br />
O<br />
409<br />
b-g<br />
O<br />
411<br />
O<br />
412<br />
a: Fusarium culmorum<br />
b: Aspergillus niger<br />
c: Aspergillus orizae<br />
d: C<strong>and</strong>ida rugosa<br />
e: C<strong>and</strong>ida tropicalis<br />
f: Mucor mucedo<br />
g: Bacillus subtilis<br />
FIGURE 15.119 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> zerumbone (408) by various fungi.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 809<br />
a<br />
c<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
a<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
415<br />
H<br />
418<br />
H<br />
414<br />
OH<br />
a<br />
b,f<br />
H<br />
416<br />
OH<br />
a: Glomerella cingulata<br />
b: Aspergillus niger<br />
c: Staphylococcus epidermidis<br />
d: Cephalosporium aphidicola<br />
e: Corynespora cassiicola<br />
f: Botrytis cinerea<br />
a,b<br />
d,e<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
417<br />
e<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
419<br />
FIGURE 15.120 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> cedrol (414) by various fungi.<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
B. cinerea<br />
H<br />
420<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
421<br />
H<br />
414<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
422<br />
OAc G. cingulata<br />
OAc<br />
H<br />
423<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
424<br />
FIGURE 15.121 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> cedrol (414) by Botrytis cinerea <strong>and</strong> Glomerella cingulata.
810 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
426<br />
H<br />
427<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
429<br />
HO<br />
a,b<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
425<br />
H<br />
428<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
430<br />
H<br />
430a<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
a: B. cinerea<br />
b: G. cingulata<br />
FIGURE 15.122 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> patchoulol (425) by Botrytis cinerea.<br />
H<br />
430b<br />
H<br />
430c<br />
OH<br />
RO<br />
HO<br />
G. cingulata G. cingulata<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
425: R=H<br />
431: R=Ac<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
426 429<br />
OH<br />
432<br />
FIGURE 15.123 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> patchoulol (425) by Glomerella cingulata.<br />
OH<br />
A. niger<br />
433 434<br />
FIGURE 15.124 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> a-longipinene (433) by Aspergillus niger.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 811<br />
OH<br />
10<br />
9<br />
6<br />
8<br />
B. cinerea<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
10<br />
OH OH<br />
9<br />
OH HO<br />
8<br />
OH<br />
6<br />
OH<br />
435<br />
436 437 438 439<br />
OH O OH 8<br />
O<br />
9<br />
6<br />
OH<br />
440 441<br />
FIGURE 15.125 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> ginsenol (435) by Botrytis cinerea.<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O O O O<br />
G. cingulata<br />
OH<br />
442<br />
443 444<br />
445<br />
FIGURE 15.126 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-isolongifolene-9-one (442) by Glomerella cingulata.<br />
Fusarium lini<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
445a<br />
OH OH OH OH<br />
445b 445c 445d<br />
Aspergillus niger<br />
FIGURE 15.127 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-isolongifolol (445a) by Aspergillus niger <strong>and</strong> Fusarium lini.<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
C. elegans<br />
OH OH OH OH<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
445e<br />
445f 445g 445h<br />
FIGURE 15.128 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-cycloisolongifol-5b-ol (445e) by Cunninghamella elegans.
812 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
O<br />
Marchantia polymorpha cell<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
446<br />
447<br />
FIGURE 15.129 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> lancerodiol p-hydroxybenzoate (446) by Marchantia polymorpha cells.<br />
OH A. niger<br />
OH OH<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
448 449 450<br />
FIGURE 15.130 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> widdrol (448) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
15<br />
14<br />
H<br />
10 8 7 6<br />
9<br />
1 5<br />
11<br />
2 3 4<br />
H<br />
13<br />
1) Pseudomonus ceuciviae<br />
2) Diplodia gossypina<br />
3) Chaetominum cochlioides<br />
HO<br />
H O<br />
12<br />
451<br />
452<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
453 454<br />
D. gossypina<br />
C. cochlioides<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
HOOC<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
457 455<br />
(5%)<br />
456<br />
(12%)<br />
FIGURE 15.131 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-b-caryophyllene (451) by Pseudomonas ceuciviae, Diplodia<br />
gossypina, <strong>and</strong> Chaetomium cochlioides.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 813<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
HOOC<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
453 454 455<br />
H<br />
OH H<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
15<br />
14<br />
H<br />
5<br />
2<br />
H<br />
11<br />
451<br />
6<br />
Diplodia gossypina<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
457 457a<br />
OH<br />
457b<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
457c O<br />
OH 457d<br />
OH<br />
457e<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
457f OH 457g OH 457h<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OHC<br />
OH<br />
457i<br />
457j<br />
FIGURE 15.132 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-b-caryophyllene (451) by Diplodia gossypina.<br />
The fermentation <strong>of</strong> (-)-b-caryophyllene oxide (453) using Botrytis cinerea <strong>and</strong> the isolation <strong>of</strong><br />
the metabolites were carried out by Duran et al. (1999) Kobuson (457w) was obtained with fourteen<br />
products (457s–457u, 457x). Diepoxides 457t <strong>and</strong> 457u could be the precursors <strong>of</strong> epimeric alcohols<br />
457q <strong>and</strong> 457y obtained through reductive opening <strong>of</strong> the C2,C11-epoxide. The major reaction<br />
paths are stereoselective epoxidation <strong>and</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> hydroxyl group at C3. Compound 457ae<br />
has a caryolane skeleton (Figure 15.134).<br />
When isoprobotryan-9a-ol (458) produced from isocaryophyllene was incubated with Botrytis<br />
cinerea, it was hydroxylated at tertiary methyl groups to give three primary alcohols (459–461)<br />
(Aleu et al., 2002) (Figure 15.135).<br />
Acyclic sesquiterpenoids, racemic cis-nerolidol (462), <strong>and</strong> nerylacetone (463) were treated by the<br />
plant pathogenic fungus, Glomerella cingulata (Miyazawa et al., 1995a). From the former substrate,<br />
a triol (464) was obtained as the major product. The latter was bioconverted to give the two methyl<br />
ketones (465, 467) <strong>and</strong> a triol (468), among which 465 was the predominant. The C10,C11 diols<br />
(464, 465) might be formed from both epoxides <strong>of</strong> the substrates, followed by the hydration although<br />
no C10,C11-epoxides were detected (Figure 15.136).
814 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
a<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
H<br />
15<br />
14<br />
H<br />
H<br />
2<br />
6<br />
5<br />
11<br />
453<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O HO<br />
H<br />
454 457k<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
a: M. phaseolina<br />
b: C. aphidicola<br />
b<br />
H<br />
457l<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
457m<br />
a<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
457n<br />
OH<br />
b<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
15<br />
14<br />
H<br />
H<br />
11<br />
2<br />
6<br />
5<br />
453<br />
O<br />
a: A. niger<br />
b: G. fujikuroii<br />
c: R. stolonifera<br />
d: F. lini<br />
c<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
457o<br />
O<br />
457p<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
H<br />
457q<br />
O<br />
d<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
457r<br />
FIGURE 15.133 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-b-caryophyllene epoxide (453) by various fungi.<br />
Racemic trans-nerolidol (469) was also treated in the same fungus to afford w-2 hydroxylated<br />
product (471) <strong>and</strong> C10,C11 hydroxylated compounds (472) as seen in racemic cis-nerolidol (462)<br />
(Miyazawa et al., 1996a) (Figure 15.137).<br />
12-Hydroxy-trans-nerolidol (472a) is an important precursor in the synthesis <strong>of</strong> interesting flavor<br />
<strong>of</strong> a-sinensal. Hrdlicka et al. (2004) reported the biotransformation <strong>of</strong> trans-(469) <strong>and</strong> cis-nerolidol
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 815<br />
15<br />
14<br />
H<br />
H<br />
5 6 B. cinerea<br />
O<br />
2 3<br />
H<br />
H<br />
11 453 457s<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
H<br />
454<br />
O<br />
B. cinerea<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
457k<br />
O<br />
457t<br />
O<br />
457u<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
O<br />
457v<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
457w<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
457x<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
457y<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
457q<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
CHO<br />
457z<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
457aa<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
457ab<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
457ac<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
457ad<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
457ae<br />
FIGURE 15.134 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-b-caryophyllene epoxide (453) by Botrytis cinerea.<br />
(462) <strong>and</strong> cis-/trans-mixture <strong>of</strong> nerolidol using repeated batch culture <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus niger grown in<br />
computer-controlled bioreactors. Trans-nerolidol (469) gave 472a <strong>and</strong> 472 <strong>and</strong> cis-isomer (462)<br />
afforded 464a <strong>and</strong> 464. From a mixture <strong>of</strong> cis- <strong>and</strong> trans-nerolidol, 12-hydroxy-trans-neroridol<br />
472a (8%) was obtained in postexponential phase at high dissolved oxygen. At low dissolved oxygen<br />
condition, the mixture gave 472a (7%) <strong>and</strong> 464a (6%) (Figure 15.138).<br />
From geranyl acetone (470) incubated with Glomerella cingulata, four products (473–477) were<br />
formed. It is noteworthy that the major compounds from both substrates (469, 470) were w–2
816 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
HO<br />
H<br />
458<br />
B. cinerea<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
459 460 461<br />
FIGURE 15.135 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> isoprobotryan-9a-ol (458) by Botrytis cinerea.<br />
hydroxylated products, but not C10,C11 dihydroxylated products as seen in cis-nerolidol (462) <strong>and</strong><br />
nerylacetone (463) (Miyazawa et al., 1995c) (Figure 15.136).<br />
The same fungus bioconverted (2E,6E)-farnesol (478) to four products, w-2 hydroxylated product<br />
(479), which was further oxidized to give C10,C11 dihydroxylated compound (480) <strong>and</strong> 5-hydroxy<br />
derivative (481), followed by isomerization at C2,C3 double bond to afford a triol (482)<br />
(Miyazawa et al., 1996b) (Figure 15.140).<br />
The same substrate was bioconverted by Aspergillus niger to afford two metabolites, 10,11-<br />
dihydroxy- (480) <strong>and</strong> 5,13-hydroxy derivative (480a) (Madyastha <strong>and</strong> Gururaja, 1993).<br />
The same fungus also converted (2Z,6Z)-farnesol (483) to three hydroxylated products: 10,11-<br />
dihydroxy-(2Z,6Z)- (484), 10,11-dihydroxy (2E,6Z)-farnesol (485), <strong>and</strong> (5Z)-9,10-dihydroxy-6,10-<br />
dimethyl-5-undecen-2-one (486) (Nankai et al., 1996) (Figure 15.140).<br />
12 10 8<br />
11 9<br />
13 462<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
OH G. cingulata<br />
3 1<br />
2<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
464<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
465<br />
463<br />
O<br />
G. cingulata<br />
466<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
468<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
467<br />
FIGURE 15.136 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> cis-nerolidol (462) <strong>and</strong> cis-geranyl acetone (463) by Glomerella<br />
cingulata.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 817<br />
469<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
G. cingulata<br />
OH<br />
471<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
472<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
G. cingulata<br />
HO<br />
473<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
476<br />
OH<br />
470<br />
O<br />
474<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
475<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
477<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 15.137 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> trans-nerolidol (469) <strong>and</strong> trans-geranyl acetone (470) by Glomerella<br />
cingulata.<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
462<br />
A. niger<br />
OH<br />
464a<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
464<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
A. niger<br />
OH<br />
472a<br />
OH<br />
469<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 15.138 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> cis- (462) <strong>and</strong> trans-nerolidol (469) by Aspergillus niger.
818 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
a<br />
HO<br />
479<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
481<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
2E,6E-farnesol (478)<br />
OH<br />
a,b<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
480<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
482<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
a: Cytochrome P-450<br />
b: Aspergillus niger<br />
b<br />
HO<br />
480a<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 15.139 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 2E,6E-farnesol (478) by Cytochrome P-450 <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus niger.<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
12 10<br />
11<br />
13<br />
5<br />
478<br />
1<br />
OH<br />
A. niger<br />
480<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
480a<br />
FIGURE 15.140 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 2E,6E-farnesol (478) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
484<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
A. niger<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
2E,6Z-farnesol (483)<br />
485<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
FIGURE 15.141 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 2Z,6Z-farnesol (478) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
486<br />
O OH<br />
A. niger<br />
O OH<br />
HO<br />
487 488<br />
FIGURE 15.142 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 9-oxo-trans-nerolidol (487) by Aspergillus niger.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 819<br />
OH<br />
a<br />
OH<br />
O OH O OH O OH<br />
488a 488b 488c<br />
b,c<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
488e<br />
a: Aspergillus niger<br />
b: Cephalsporium aphidicola<br />
c: Neurospora crassa<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
488d<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 15.143 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> diisophorone (488a) by Aspergillus niger, Cephalosporium aphidicola,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Neurospora crassa.<br />
A linear sesquiterpene 9-oxonerolidol (487) was treated in Aspergillus niger to give w-1 hydroxylated<br />
product (488) (Higuchi et al., 2001) (Figure 15.142).<br />
Racemic diisophorone (488a) dissolved in ethanol was incubated with the Czapek–Dox medium<br />
<strong>of</strong> Aspergillus niger to afford 8a- (488b), 10b- (488c), <strong>and</strong> 17-hydroxydiisophorone (488d) (Kiran<br />
et al., 2004).<br />
On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the same substrate was fed with Nicotiana crassa <strong>and</strong> Cephalosporium<br />
aphidicola to afford only 8b-hydroxydiisophorone (488e) in 20% <strong>and</strong> 10% yield, respectively<br />
(Kiran et al., 2005) (Figure 15.143).<br />
From the metabolites <strong>of</strong> 5b,6b-dihydroxypresilphiperfolane 2b-angelate (488f) using the fungus<br />
Mucor ramannianus, 2,3-epoxyangeloyloxy derivative (488g) was obtained (Orabi, 2001)<br />
(Figure 15.144).<br />
15.3 BIOTRANSFORMATION OF SESQUITERPENOIDS BY MAMMALS,<br />
INSECTS, AND CYTOCHROME P-450<br />
15.3.1 ANIMALS (RABBITS) AND DOSING<br />
Six male albino rabbits (2–3 kg) were starved for 2 days before experiment. Monoterpene were<br />
suspended in water (100 mL) containing polysorbate 80 (0.1 g) <strong>and</strong> were homogenized well. This<br />
solution (20 mL) was administered to each rabbit through a stomach tube followed by water (20 mL).<br />
This dose <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenoids corresponds to 400–700 mg/kg. Rabbits were housed in stainless<br />
steal metabolism cages <strong>and</strong> were allowed rabbit food <strong>and</strong> water ad libitum. The urine was collected<br />
daily for 3 days after drug administration <strong>and</strong> stored at 0–5∞C until the time <strong>of</strong> analysis. The urine<br />
was centrifuged to remove feces <strong>and</strong> hairs at 0∞C <strong>and</strong> the supernatant was used for the experiments.<br />
O<br />
O<br />
488f<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
M. ramannianus<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
488g<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 15.144 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 5b,6b-dihydroxypresilphiperfolane 2b-angelate (488f) by Mucor<br />
ramannianus.
820 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
The urine was adjusted to pH 4.6 with acetate buffer <strong>and</strong> incubated with b-glucuronidase-arylsufatase<br />
(3 mL/100 mL <strong>of</strong> fresh urine) at 37∞C for 48 h, followed by continuous ether extraction for 48 h.<br />
The ether extracts were washed with 5% NaHCO 3 <strong>and</strong> 5% NaOH to remove the acidic <strong>and</strong> phenolic<br />
components, respectively. The ether extract was dried over MgSO 4 , followed by evaporation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
solvent to give the neutral crude metabolites (Ishida et al., 1981).<br />
15.3.2 SESQUITERPENOIDS<br />
Wild rabbits (hair) <strong>and</strong> deer damage the young leaves <strong>of</strong> Chamaecyparis obtusa, one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
important furniture <strong>and</strong> house-constructing tree in Japan. The essential oil <strong>of</strong> the leaves contains a<br />
large amount <strong>of</strong> (-)-longifolene (489). Longifolene (36 g) was administered to 18 <strong>of</strong> rabbits to obtain<br />
the metabolites (3.7 g) from which an aldehyde (490) (35.5%) was isolated as pure state. In the<br />
metabolism <strong>of</strong> terpenoids having an exomethylene group, glycol formation was <strong>of</strong>ten found, but in<br />
the case <strong>of</strong> longifolene such as a diol was not formed. Introduction <strong>of</strong> an aldehydes group in biotrans<br />
formation is very remarkable. Stereoselective hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> the gem dimethyl group on a sevenmembered<br />
ring is first time (Ishida et al., 1982) (Figure 15.145).<br />
(-)-b-Caryophyllene (451) is one <strong>of</strong> the ubiquitous sesquiterpene hydrocarbons in plant kingdom<br />
<strong>and</strong> the main component <strong>of</strong> beer hops <strong>and</strong> clove oil, <strong>and</strong> is being used as a culinary ingredient <strong>and</strong> as<br />
a cosmetic in soaps <strong>and</strong> fragrances. (-)-b-Caryophyllene also has cytotoxic against breast carcinoma<br />
cells <strong>and</strong> its epoxide is toxic to Planaria worms. It contains unique 1,1-dimethylcyclobutane skeleton.<br />
(-)-b-Caryophyllene (3 g) was treated in the same manner as described above to afford the crude<br />
metabolite (2.27 g) from which (10S)-14-hydroxycaryophyllene-5,6-oxide (491) (80%) <strong>and</strong> a diol (492)<br />
were obtained (Asakawa et al., 1981). Later, compound (491) was isolated from the Polish mushroom,<br />
Lactarius camphorates (Basidiomycetes) as a natural product (Daniewski et al., 1981). 14-Hyroxy-bcallyophyllene<br />
<strong>and</strong> 1-hydroxy-8-keto-b-caryophyllene have been found in Asteraceae <strong>and</strong> Pseudomonas<br />
species, respectively. In order to confirm that caryophyllene epoxide (453) is the intermediate <strong>of</strong> both<br />
metabolites, it was treated in the same manner as described above to give the same metabolites (491)<br />
<strong>and</strong> (492), <strong>of</strong> which 491 was predominant (Asakawa et al., 1981, 1986) (Figure 15.146).<br />
The grapefruit aroma, (+)-nootkatone (2) was administered into rabbits to give 11,12-diol (6, 7).<br />
The same metabolism has been found in that <strong>of</strong> biotransformation <strong>of</strong> nootkatone by microorganisms<br />
as mentioned in the previous paragraph. Compounds (6, 7) were isolated from the urine <strong>of</strong> hypertensive<br />
subjects <strong>and</strong> named urodiolenone. The endogenous production <strong>of</strong> 6, 7 seem to occur interdentally<br />
from the administrative manner <strong>of</strong> nootkatone or grapefruit. Synthetic racemic nootkatone<br />
epoxide (14) was incubated with rabbit-liver microsomes to give 11,12-diol (6, 7) (Ishida, 2005).<br />
Thus, the role <strong>of</strong> the epoxide was clearly confirmed as an intermediate <strong>of</strong> nootkatone (2).<br />
(+)-ent-Cyclocolorenone (98) <strong>and</strong> its enantiomer (103) were biotransformed by Aspergillus<br />
species to give cyclopropane-cleaved metabolites as described in the previous paragraph.<br />
In order to compare the metabolites between mammals <strong>and</strong> microorganisms, the essential oil<br />
(2 g/rabbit) containing (-)-cyclocolorenone (103) obtained from Solidago altissima was administered<br />
in rabbits to obtain two metabolites; 9b-hydroxycyclocolorenone (493) <strong>and</strong> 10-hydroxycyclocolorenone<br />
(494) (Asakawa et al., 1986). 10-Hydroxyaromadendrane-type compounds are well<br />
HO<br />
Rabbit<br />
H H<br />
O<br />
CHO<br />
489<br />
FIGURE 15.145 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> longifolene (489) by rabbit.<br />
490<br />
CHO
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 821<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H<br />
H<br />
O<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
492<br />
15<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
14<br />
H 8 7 13<br />
H<br />
H<br />
6<br />
6<br />
11 9<br />
Rabbit<br />
1 5 O<br />
453<br />
5<br />
10<br />
2 4<br />
H<br />
H<br />
3<br />
OH<br />
12 451 14 H<br />
491<br />
O<br />
H<br />
FIGURE 15.146 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-b-caryophyllene (451) by rabbit.<br />
known as the natural products. No oxygenated compound <strong>of</strong> cyclopropane ring was found in the<br />
metabolites <strong>of</strong> cyclocolorenone in rabbit (Figure 15.147).<br />
From the metabolites <strong>of</strong> elemol (495) possessing the same partial structures <strong>of</strong> monoterpene<br />
hydrocarbon, myrcene, <strong>and</strong> nootkatone, one primary alcohol (496) was obtained from rabbit urine<br />
after the administration <strong>of</strong> 495 (Asakawa et al., 1986) (Figure 15.148).<br />
Components <strong>of</strong> cedar wood such as cedrol (414) <strong>and</strong> cedrene shorten the sleeping time <strong>of</strong> mice.<br />
In order to search for a relationship between scent, olfaction, <strong>and</strong> detoxifying enzyme induction,<br />
(+)-cedrol (414) was administered to rabbits <strong>and</strong> dogs. From the metabolites from rabbits, two<br />
C3 hydroxylated products (418 <strong>and</strong> 497) <strong>and</strong> a diol (415 or 416), which might be formed after the<br />
hydrogenation <strong>of</strong> double bond. Dogs converted cedrol (414) into the different metabolite products,<br />
H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
Rabbit<br />
O<br />
O<br />
103<br />
493<br />
494<br />
FIGURE 15.147 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-ent-cyclocolorenone (101) by rabbit.<br />
Rabbit<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
495<br />
FIGURE 15.148 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> elemol (495) by rabbit.<br />
H<br />
496<br />
OH
822 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
3<br />
2<br />
OH Rabbit<br />
HO<br />
3<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
414<br />
Dog 415 or 417<br />
418<br />
497<br />
HO 15<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
2<br />
H<br />
H<br />
HO H<br />
HO H<br />
415 416<br />
498 499<br />
FIGURE 15.149 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> cedrol (414) by rabbits or dogs.<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
C2 (498) <strong>and</strong> C2/C14 hydroxylated products (499), together with the same C3 (415) <strong>and</strong> C15 hydroxylated<br />
products (416) as those found in the metabolites <strong>of</strong> microorganisms <strong>and</strong> rabbits. The above<br />
species-specific metabolism is very remarkable (Bang <strong>and</strong> Ourisson, 1975).<br />
The microorganisms, Cephalosporium aphidicoda, Corynespora cassicoda, Botrytis cinerea,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Glomerella cingulata also biotransformed cedrol to various C2, C3, C4, C6, <strong>and</strong> C15 hydroxylated<br />
products as shown in the previous paragraph. The microbial metabolism <strong>of</strong> cedrol resembles<br />
that <strong>of</strong> mammals (Figure 15.149).<br />
Patchouli alcohol (425) with fungi static properties is one <strong>of</strong> the important essential oils in perfumery<br />
industry. Rabbits <strong>and</strong> dogs gave two oxidative products (500, 501) <strong>and</strong> one norpatchoulen-<br />
1-one (502) possessing a characteristic odor. Plant pathogen, Botrytis cinerea causes many diseases<br />
for vegetables <strong>and</strong> flowers. This pathogen gave totally different five metabolites (426–430) from<br />
those found in the urine metabolites <strong>of</strong> mammals as described above (Bang et al., 1975)<br />
(Figure 15.150).<br />
S<strong>and</strong>alwood oil contains mainly a-santalol (503) <strong>and</strong> b-santalol. Rabbits converted a-santalol to<br />
three diastereomeric primary alcohols (504–506) <strong>and</strong> dogs did carboxylic acid (507) (Zundel, 1976)<br />
(Figure 15.151).<br />
(2E,6E)-Farnesol (478) was treated in cockroach Cytochrome P-450 (CYP4C7) to form region<strong>and</strong><br />
diastereospecifically w-hydroxylated at the C12 methyl group to the corresponding diol (508)<br />
with 10E-configuratation (Sutherl<strong>and</strong> et al., 1998) (Figure 15.152).<br />
Juvenile hormone III (509) was also treated in cockroach CYP4C7 to the corresponding 12-hydroxylated<br />
product (510) (Sutherl<strong>and</strong> et al., 1998).<br />
The African locust converted the same substrate (509) into a 7-hydroxy product (511) <strong>and</strong> a<br />
13-hydroxylated product (512). It is noteworthy that the African locust <strong>and</strong> cockroach showed clear<br />
species specificity for introduction <strong>of</strong> oxygen function (Darrouzet et al., 1997).<br />
HO<br />
Rabbit<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
or Dog<br />
H<br />
15<br />
H<br />
HOOC H<br />
H<br />
OH<br />
425 500 501 502<br />
FIGURE 15.150 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> patchouli alcohol (425) by rabbits or dogs.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 823<br />
OH<br />
15<br />
504<br />
OH<br />
10<br />
14<br />
15<br />
OH<br />
Rabbit<br />
14<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
503<br />
Dog<br />
505<br />
13<br />
OH<br />
10<br />
COOH<br />
OH<br />
506<br />
507<br />
FIGURE 15.151 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> santalol (503) by rabbits or dogs.<br />
15.4 BIOTRANSFORMATION OF IONONES, DAMASCONES,<br />
AND ADAMANTANES<br />
Racemic a-ionone (513) was converted to 4-hydroxy-a-ionone (514), which was further dehydrogenated<br />
to 4-oxo-a-ionone (515) by Chlorella ellipsoidea IAMC-27 <strong>and</strong> Chlorella vulgaris IAMC-<br />
209. a-Ionone (513) was reduced preferentially to a-ionol (516) by Chlorella sorokiniana <strong>and</strong><br />
Chlorella salina (Noma et al. 1997a).<br />
a-Ionol (516) was oxidized by Chlorella pyrenoidosa to afford 4-hydroxy-a-ionol (524). The<br />
same substrate was fed by the same microorganism <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus niger to furnish a-ionone (513)<br />
(Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 1998) (Figure 15.153).<br />
13<br />
12<br />
11<br />
10<br />
7<br />
2<br />
478<br />
1<br />
OH<br />
CYP450<br />
(CYP4C7)<br />
HO<br />
12<br />
508<br />
2<br />
OH<br />
13<br />
O<br />
12<br />
11<br />
10<br />
7<br />
2<br />
509<br />
O<br />
CYP450<br />
OMe<br />
(CYP4C7)<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
12<br />
R 1<br />
12'<br />
O<br />
R 2<br />
12<br />
510<br />
7<br />
511: R 1 =H, R 2 =OH<br />
512: R 1 =OH, R 2 =H<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OMe<br />
OMe<br />
FIGURE 15.152 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 2E,6E-farnesol (478) by cockroach Cytochrome P-450 <strong>and</strong> 10,11-<br />
epoxyfarnesic acid methyl ester (509) by African locust Cytochrome P-450.
824 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
A. cellulosae<br />
C. pyrenoidosa<br />
O O<br />
C. salina<br />
12<br />
OH<br />
13<br />
C. sorokiniana<br />
7<br />
D. tertiolocta<br />
E. gracilis 5 6 1 H. anomala<br />
8 9 10<br />
A. sojae 4 2<br />
522 3 11 513 A. niger<br />
516<br />
C. pyrenoidosa<br />
A. niger<br />
E. gracilis<br />
C. ellipsoidea<br />
C. pyrenoidosa<br />
C. pyrenoidosa<br />
C. vulgaris<br />
OH O OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
523 HO<br />
514<br />
HO<br />
524<br />
A. niger<br />
B. dothidea<br />
C. ellipsoidea<br />
C. pyrenoidosa<br />
C. pyrenoidosa<br />
C. pyrenoidosa<br />
D. tertiolecta<br />
E. gracilis<br />
O<br />
O<br />
H. anomala<br />
OH<br />
A. niger<br />
Rh. minuta<br />
C. pyrenoidosa<br />
A. cellulosae<br />
A. niger<br />
O<br />
A. sojae<br />
O<br />
520 515<br />
517<br />
A. niger<br />
A. sojae<br />
A. cellulosae, A sojae<br />
B. dothidea, E. gracilis<br />
D. tertiolecta, Rh. minuta<br />
FIGURE 15.153 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> a-ionone (513) by various microorganisms.<br />
O<br />
C. pyrenoidosa<br />
B. dothidea<br />
D. tertiolecta<br />
O<br />
E. gracilis<br />
O<br />
521 O<br />
O<br />
518<br />
519<br />
OH<br />
4-Oxo-a-ionone (515), which is one <strong>of</strong> the major product <strong>of</strong> a-ionone (513) by Aspergillus Niger,<br />
was transformed reductively by Hansenula anomala, Rhodotorula minuta, Dunaliella tertiolecta,<br />
Euglena gracilis, Chlorella pyrenoidosa C28 <strong>and</strong> other eight kinds <strong>of</strong> Chlorella species,<br />
Botryosphaeria dothidea, Aspergillus cellulosae IFO 4040 <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus sojae IFO 4389 to give<br />
4-oxo-a-ionol (517), 4-oxo-7,8-dihydro-a-ionone (518), <strong>and</strong> 4-oxo-7,8-dihydro-a-ionol (519).<br />
Compound 515 was also oxidized by Aspergillus niger <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus sojae to give 1-hydroxy-4-oxoa-ionone<br />
(520) <strong>and</strong> 7,11-oxido-4-oxo-7,8-dihydro-a-ionone (521). C7–C8 Double bond <strong>of</strong> a-ionone<br />
(513), 4-oxo a-ionone (515), <strong>and</strong> 4-oxo-a-ionol (517) were easily reduced to their corresponding<br />
dihydro products (522, 518, 519), respectively, by Euglena, Aspergillus, Botrysphaeria, <strong>and</strong> Chlorella<br />
species. The metabolite (522) was further reduced to 523 by Euglena gracilis (Noma et al., 1998).<br />
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-1R-a-ionone (513a), [a] D +386.5∞; 99% ee <strong>and</strong> (-)-1S-a-ionone (513a¢),<br />
[a] D -361.6∞, 98% ee, which were obtained by optical resolution <strong>of</strong> racemic a-ionone (513), was fed<br />
by Aspergillus niger for 4 days in Czapek-peptone medium. From (513a), 4a-hydroxy-a-ionone<br />
(514a), 4b-hydroxy-a-ionone (514b), <strong>and</strong> 4-oxo-a-ionone (515a) were obtained, while from compound<br />
513a¢, the enantiomers (514a¢, 514b¢, 515a¢) <strong>of</strong> the metabolites from 513a were obtained;<br />
however, the difference <strong>of</strong> their yields were observed. In case <strong>of</strong> 513a, 4a-hydroxy-a-ionone (514a)<br />
was obtained as the major product, while 515a¢ was predominantly obtained from 513a¢. This oxidation<br />
was inhibited by 1-aminobenzotriazole, thus CYP-450 is contributed to this oxidation process<br />
(Hashimoto et al., 2000) (Figure 15.154).<br />
a-Damascone (525) was incubated with Aspergillus niger <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus terreus, in Czapekpeptone<br />
medium to give cis- (525) <strong>and</strong> trans-3-hydroxy-a-damascones (527) <strong>and</strong> 3-oxo-a-damscone
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 825<br />
O O O O<br />
1R<br />
513a<br />
A. niger<br />
HO HO O<br />
514a<br />
(46.2%)<br />
514b<br />
(23.1%)<br />
515a<br />
(15.6%)<br />
O O O O<br />
1S<br />
A. niger<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
513a'<br />
514a'<br />
(17.0%)<br />
514b'<br />
(6.5%)<br />
515a'<br />
(69.2%)<br />
FIGURE 15.154 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (1R)-a-ionone (513a) <strong>and</strong> (1S)-a-ionone (513a¢) by Aspergillus<br />
niger.<br />
(528), while the latter Aspergillus species afforded 3-oxo-8,9-dihydro-a-damascone (529). The<br />
hydroxylation process <strong>of</strong> 525–527 was inhibited by CYP-450 inhibitor. Hansenula anomala reduced<br />
a-damascone (525) to a-damascol (530). Cis- (526) <strong>and</strong> trans-4-hydroxy-a-damascone (527) were<br />
fed by Chlorella pyrenoidosa in Noro medium to give 4-oxodamascone (528) (Noma et al., 2001a)<br />
(Figure 15.155).<br />
b-Damascone (531) was also treated in Aspergillus niger to afford 5-hydroxy-b-damascone<br />
(532), 3-hydroxy-b-damascone (533), 5-oxo- (534), 3-oxo-b-damscone (535), <strong>and</strong> 3-oxo-1, 9-dihydroxy-1,2-dihydro-b-damascone<br />
(536) as the minor components. In case <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus terreus,<br />
3-hydroxy-8,9-dihydro-b-damascone (537) was also obtained (Figure 15.156).<br />
Adamantane derivatives have been used as many medicinal drugs. In order to obtain the drugs,<br />
adamantanes were incubated by many microorganisms, such as Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus<br />
awamori, Aspergillus cellulosae, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus sojae, Aspergillus terreus,<br />
O<br />
A. niger<br />
CYP450 inhibitor<br />
12 13 O<br />
9<br />
5 6 1 7 8<br />
4 2<br />
10 H. anomala<br />
3 11<br />
525<br />
A. niger<br />
CYP450 inhibitor<br />
X<br />
530<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
526<br />
C. pyrenoidosa<br />
O<br />
C. pyrenoidosa<br />
HO<br />
527<br />
O<br />
A. terreus<br />
O<br />
528<br />
O<br />
529<br />
FIGURE 15.155 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> a-damascone (525) by various microorganisms.
826 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
HO<br />
O<br />
A. niger<br />
O<br />
532<br />
531<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
534<br />
A. niger<br />
OH<br />
533<br />
A. terreus<br />
OH<br />
537<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
A. niger<br />
OH<br />
535<br />
O<br />
536<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 15.156 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> b-damascone (531) by Aspergillus niger <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus terreus.<br />
Botryospherica dothidea, Chlorella pyrenoidosa IMCC-28, Chlorella sorokiriana, Fusarium<br />
culmurorum, Euglena glacilis, <strong>and</strong> Hansenula anomala (Figure 15.157).<br />
Adamantane (538) was incubated with Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus Cellulosea, <strong>and</strong><br />
Botryosphaeria dothidea in Czapek-peptone medium. The same substrate was also treated in<br />
Chlorella pyrenoidosa in Noro medium. Compound 538 was converted into both 1-hydroxy- (539)<br />
<strong>and</strong> 9a-hydroxyadamantane (540) by all four microorganisms, followed by oxidation oxidized<br />
to give 1,9a-dihydroxyadamantanol (541) by Aspergillus Niger, which was further oxidized to 1-hydroxyadamantane-9-one<br />
(542), which was reduced to afford 1,9b-hydroxyadamantane (544).<br />
Aspergillus niger gave the metabolite (541) as the major product in 80% yield. Aspergillus cellulosae<br />
converted 538 to 539 <strong>and</strong> 540 in the ratio <strong>of</strong> 81:19. Chlorella pyrenoidosa gave 539, 540 <strong>and</strong><br />
adamantane-9-one (543) in the ratio 74:16:10. 4a-Adamantanol (540) was directly converted by<br />
Chlorella pyrenoidosa, Aspergillus niger, <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus cellulosae to afford 543, which was also<br />
reduced to 9a-adamantanol (540) by Aspergillus niger. The biotransformation <strong>of</strong> adamantane, however,<br />
did not occur by the microorganisms: Hansenula anomala, Chlorella sorokiriana, Dunaliella<br />
tertiolecta, <strong>and</strong> Euglena glacilis (Noma et al., 1999).<br />
OH O OH<br />
a a a<br />
a<br />
HO HO HO HO<br />
539 541 542<br />
544<br />
a-d<br />
a<br />
8 OH<br />
7 9<br />
10<br />
4 3 a-d<br />
a<br />
5<br />
a<br />
6<br />
1 2<br />
538 540 543<br />
O<br />
a: A. niger<br />
b: A. cellulosae<br />
c: B. dothidea<br />
d: C. pyrenoidosa<br />
FIGURE 15.157 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> adamantane (538) by various microorganisms.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 827<br />
Adamantanes (538–543, 542) were also incubated with various fungi including with Fusarium<br />
culmurorum. 1-Hydroxyadamantane-9-one (542) was reduced stereoselectively to 541 by Aspergillus<br />
niger, Aspergillus cellulosae, Botryosphaeria dothidea, <strong>and</strong> Fusarium culmurorum. On the<br />
contrary, Fusarium culmurorum reduced 541–542. Aspergillus cellulosae <strong>and</strong> Botryosphaeria<br />
dothidea bioconverted 542 to 1,9b-hydroxyadamantane (544) stereoselectively. Adamantane-9-one<br />
(543) was treated by Aspergillus niger to give nonsteroselectively 545–547 that were further converted<br />
into diketone (548, 549) <strong>and</strong> a diol (550). It is noteworthy that oxidation <strong>and</strong> reduction reactions<br />
were observed between ketoalcohol (547) <strong>and</strong> diols (551, 552). The same phenomenon was<br />
also seen between 546 <strong>and</strong> 553. The latter diol was also oxidized by Aspergillus niger to furnish<br />
diketone (549) (Noma et al., 2001b, 2003). Direct hydroxylation at C3 <strong>of</strong> 1-hydroxyadamantane-<br />
9-one (542) was seen in the incubation <strong>of</strong> 539 with Aspergillus niger.<br />
4-Adamantanone (543) showed promotion effect <strong>of</strong> cell division <strong>of</strong> the fungus, while 1-adamantanol<br />
(539) <strong>and</strong> adamantane-9-one (543) inhibited germination <strong>of</strong> lettuce seed. 1-Hydroxyadamantane-<br />
9-one (542) inhibited the elongation <strong>of</strong> root <strong>of</strong> lettuce while <strong>and</strong> adamantane-1,4-diol (544) <strong>and</strong><br />
adamantane itself (538) promoted root elongation (Noma et al., 1999, 2001b) (Figure 15.158).<br />
Stereoselective reduction <strong>of</strong> racemic bicycle[3.3.1]nonane-2,6-dione (555a, 555a¢) was carried<br />
out by Aspergillus awamori, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus cellulosae, Aspergillus<br />
sojae, Aspergillus terreus, Aspergillus niger, Botryosphaeria dothidea, <strong>and</strong> Fusarium culmorum<br />
in Czapek-peptone, Hansenula anomala in yeast, Euglena glacilis in Hunter, <strong>and</strong> Dunaliella<br />
tertiolecta in Noro medium, respectively. All microorganisms reduced 555 <strong>and</strong> 555a¢ to give<br />
a-e<br />
a<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
538 HO 539<br />
HO 554<br />
a<br />
a-d<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
a: A. niger<br />
b: A. cellulosae<br />
c: C. pyrenoidosa<br />
d: B. dothidea<br />
e: F. curmurorum<br />
540<br />
543<br />
a<br />
O<br />
a<br />
a<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
e<br />
542<br />
545<br />
546<br />
547<br />
FIGURE 15.158 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> adamantane (538) <strong>and</strong> adamantane-9-one by various microorganisms.<br />
541<br />
a,b,d<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
a<br />
a,b,d<br />
a<br />
a<br />
a<br />
a<br />
HO<br />
a<br />
O<br />
O<br />
a<br />
HO<br />
a<br />
a<br />
544<br />
550<br />
548<br />
a<br />
a<br />
549<br />
a<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
a<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
552<br />
546<br />
553<br />
551<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH
828 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
555<br />
O<br />
Aspergillus sp.<br />
B. dothidea<br />
F. curmurorum<br />
H. anomala<br />
E. gracilis<br />
D. tertiolecta<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
556<br />
OH<br />
557<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
555a 556a 557a<br />
Piridium dichromate<br />
FIGURE 15.159 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> bicyclo[3.3.1]nonane-2,6-dione (555a, 555a¢) by various<br />
microorganisms.<br />
corresponding monoalcohol (556, 556a) <strong>and</strong> optical-active (-)-diol (557a) ([a] D -71.8∞ in the case<br />
<strong>of</strong> Aspergillus terreus), which was formed by enantioselective reduction <strong>of</strong> racemic monool, namely<br />
556 <strong>and</strong> 556a (Noma et al., 2003) (Figure 15.159).<br />
15.5 BIOTRANSFORMATION OF AROMATIC COMPOUNDS<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils contain aromatic compounds, such as p-cymene, carvacrol, thymol, vanillin, cinnamaldehyde,<br />
eugenol, chavicol, safrole, <strong>and</strong> asarone (558), among others.<br />
Takahashi (1994) reported that simple aromatic compounds, propylbenzene, hexylbenene, decylbenzene,<br />
o- <strong>and</strong> p-hydroxypropiophenones, p-methoxypropiophenone, 4-hexylresorcinol, <strong>and</strong> methyl<br />
4-hexylresorcionol were incubated with Aspergillus niger. From hexyl- <strong>and</strong> decylbenzenes, w1-hydroxylated<br />
products were obtained, whereas from propylbenzene, w2 hydroxylated metabolites<br />
were obtained (Takahashi, 1994).<br />
Asarone (558) <strong>and</strong> dihydroeugenol (562) were not biotransformed by Aspergillus niger. However,<br />
dihydroasarone (559) <strong>and</strong> methyldihyroeugenol (563) were biotransformed by the same fungus to<br />
produce a small amount <strong>of</strong> 2-hydroxy (560, 561) <strong>and</strong> 2-oxo derivatives (564, 565), respectively. The<br />
chirality at C2 was determined to be R <strong>and</strong> S mixtures (1:2) by the modified Mosher method<br />
(Takahashi, 1994) (Figure 15.160).<br />
Chlorella species are excellent microalgae as oxidation bioreactors as mentioned earlier.<br />
Treatment <strong>of</strong> monoterpene aldehydes <strong>and</strong> related aldehydes were reduced to the corresponding primary<br />
alcohols, indicating that these green algae possess reductase.<br />
A microalgae, Euglena gracillis Z. also contains reductase. The following aromatic aldehydes<br />
were treated in this organism. Benzaldehyde, 2-cyanobenzaldehyde, o-, m-, <strong>and</strong> p-anisaldehyde,<br />
salicylaldehyde, o-, m-, <strong>and</strong> p-tolualdehyde, o-chlorobenzaldehyde, p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, o-nitro-,<br />
m-, <strong>and</strong> p-nitrobenaldeyde, 3-cyanobenzaldehyde, vanillin, isovanillin, o-vanillin, nicotine<br />
aldehyde, 3-phenylpropionaldehyde, ethyl vanillin. Veratraldehyde, 3-nitrosalicylaldehde, penylacetaldehyde,<br />
<strong>and</strong> 2-phenylproanaldehyde gave their corresponding primary alcohols. 2-Cyanobenzaldehyde<br />
gave its corresponding alcohol with phthalate. m- <strong>and</strong> p-Chlorobenzaldehyde gave its<br />
corresponding alcohols <strong>and</strong> m- <strong>and</strong> p-chlorobenzoic acids. o-Phthaldehyde <strong>and</strong> p-phthalate <strong>and</strong> iso<strong>and</strong><br />
terephthaldehydes gave their corresponding monoalohols <strong>and</strong> dialcohols. When cinnamaldehyde<br />
<strong>and</strong> a-methyl cinnamaldehyde were incubated in Euglena gracilis, cinnamyl alcohol <strong>and</strong><br />
3-phenylpropanol, <strong>and</strong> 2-methylcinnamyl alcohol, <strong>and</strong> 2-methyo-3-phenylpropanol were obtained
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 829<br />
OMe<br />
OMe<br />
MeO<br />
558<br />
OMe<br />
OMe<br />
OMe<br />
OMe<br />
OMe<br />
OMe<br />
A. niger<br />
MeO<br />
MeO<br />
OH<br />
MeO<br />
O<br />
559<br />
560<br />
561<br />
OH<br />
OMe<br />
562<br />
OMe<br />
OMe<br />
OMe<br />
OMe<br />
OMe<br />
OMe<br />
A. niger<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 15.160<br />
niger.<br />
563<br />
564<br />
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> dihydroasarone (559) <strong>and</strong> methyldihydro eugenol (563) by Aspergillus<br />
in good yield. Euglena gracilis could convert acetophenone to 2-phenylethanol; however, its enantioexcess<br />
is very poor (10%) (Takahashi, 1994).<br />
Raspberry ketone (566) <strong>and</strong> zingerone (574) are the major components <strong>of</strong> raspberry (Rubus<br />
idaeus) <strong>and</strong> ginger (Zingeber <strong>of</strong>fi cinale) <strong>and</strong> these are used as food additive <strong>and</strong> spice. Two<br />
substrates were incubated with the Phytolacca americana cultured cells for 3 days to produce<br />
two secondary alcohols (567, 568) as well as five glucosides (569–572) from 566, <strong>and</strong> a secondary<br />
alcohol (576) <strong>and</strong> four glycoside products (575, 577–579) from 574. In the case <strong>of</strong> raspberry<br />
ketone, phenolic hydroxyl group was preferably glycosylated after the reduction <strong>of</strong> carbonyl group<br />
<strong>of</strong> the substrate occurred. It is interesting to note that one more hydroxyl group was introduced<br />
into the benzene ring to give 568, which were further glycosylated one <strong>of</strong> the phenolic hydroxyl<br />
groups <strong>and</strong> no glycocide <strong>of</strong> the secondary alcohol at C2 were obtained (Figure 15.161).<br />
On the other h<strong>and</strong>, zingerone (574) was converted into 576, followed by glycosylation to give<br />
both glucosides (577, 578) <strong>of</strong> phenolic <strong>and</strong> secondary hydroxyl groups <strong>and</strong> a diglucoside (579) <strong>of</strong><br />
both phenolic <strong>and</strong> secondary hydroxyl group in the molecule. It is the first report on the introduction<br />
<strong>of</strong> individual glucose residues onto both phenolic <strong>and</strong> secondary hydroxyl groups by cultured plant<br />
cells (Shimoda et al., 2007) (Figure 15.162).<br />
Thymol (580), carvacrol (583), <strong>and</strong> eugenol (586) were glucosylated by glycosyl transferase <strong>of</strong><br />
cell-cultured Eucalyptus perriniana to each glucoside (581, 3%; 584, 5%; 587, 7%) <strong>and</strong> gentiobioside<br />
565
830 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
HO<br />
GlcO<br />
Raspberry (566)<br />
O<br />
569 O<br />
HO<br />
GlcO<br />
HO<br />
567 OH<br />
570 OH<br />
571 OGlc<br />
HO<br />
GlcO<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
568 OH<br />
HO<br />
572 OH<br />
GlcO<br />
573 OH<br />
FIGURE 15.161 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> raspberry ketone (566) by Phytolacca americana cells.<br />
(582, 87%; 585, 56%; 588, 58%). The yield <strong>of</strong> thymol glycosides was 1.5 times higher than that <strong>of</strong><br />
carvacrol <strong>and</strong> 4 times higher than that <strong>of</strong> eugenol. Such glycosylation is useful to obtain higher<br />
water-soluble products from natural <strong>and</strong> commercially available secondary metabolites for food<br />
additives <strong>and</strong> cosmetic fields (Shimoda et al., 2006) (Figure 15.163).<br />
Hinokitiol (589), which is easily obtained from cell suspension cultures <strong>of</strong> Thujopsis dolabrata<br />
<strong>and</strong> possesses potent antimicrobial activity, was incubated with cultured cells <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus<br />
perriniana for 7 days to give its monoglucosides (590, 591, 32%) <strong>and</strong> gentiobiosides (592, 593)<br />
(Furuya et al., 1997, Hamada et al., 1998) (Figure 15.164).<br />
(-)-Nopol benzyl ether (594) was smoothly biotransformed by Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus<br />
cellulosae, Aspergillus sojae, Aspergillus Usami, <strong>and</strong> Penicillium species in Czapek-peptone<br />
medium to give (-)-4-oxonopol-2¢,4¢-dihydroxybenzyl ether (595, 23% in the case <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus<br />
niger), which demonstrated antioxidant activity (ID 50 30.23 m/M), together with a small amount <strong>of</strong><br />
nopol (6.3% in Aspergillus niger). This is very rare direct introduction <strong>of</strong> oxygen function on the<br />
phenyl ring (Noma <strong>and</strong> Asakawa, 2006) (Figure 15.165).<br />
HO<br />
H 3 CO<br />
Gingerone (574) O<br />
GlcO<br />
H 3 CO<br />
575 O<br />
HO<br />
GlcO<br />
HO<br />
GlcO<br />
H 3 CO H 3 CO H 3 CO<br />
H 3 CO<br />
576 OH<br />
577 OH<br />
578 OGlc<br />
FIGURE 15.162 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> zingerone (574) by Phytolacca americana cells.<br />
579<br />
OGlc
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 831<br />
HO<br />
580<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
581<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
O O<br />
OH<br />
582<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
583<br />
584<br />
585<br />
HO<br />
OCH 3<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OCH 3<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OCH3<br />
586<br />
587<br />
FIGURE 15.163 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> thymol (580), carvacrol (583), <strong>and</strong> eugenol (586) by Eucalyptus<br />
perriniana cells.<br />
588<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
Hinokitiol (589)<br />
E. perriniana<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
(a)<br />
(b)<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
CH<br />
OH<br />
2<br />
HO O<br />
HO O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
FIGURE 15.164 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> hinokitiol (589) by Eucalyptus perriniana cells.<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
590<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
O O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
591<br />
HO<br />
HO<br />
CH 2 OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO CH 2<br />
HO<br />
HO O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
593<br />
592<br />
O<br />
O<br />
A. niger<br />
A. cellulosae<br />
A. sojae<br />
A. usami<br />
Penicillium sp. KCPYN<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
(–)-Nopol benzylether (594)<br />
595 (23%)<br />
FIGURE 15.165 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> nopol benzylether (531) by Aspergillus <strong>and</strong> Penicillium species.
832 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
MeO<br />
HO<br />
N<br />
H<br />
O<br />
597<br />
(60.9%)<br />
8<br />
9<br />
11<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
MeO<br />
A. niger<br />
MeO<br />
N<br />
HO<br />
H<br />
HO<br />
Capsaicin (596)<br />
N<br />
H<br />
O<br />
598<br />
(16.0%)<br />
11<br />
OH<br />
MeO<br />
HO<br />
N<br />
H<br />
O<br />
599<br />
(13.6%)<br />
7<br />
COOH<br />
FIGURE 15.166 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> capsaicin (596) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
Capsicum annuum contains capsaicin (596) <strong>and</strong> its homologues having an alkylvanillylamides<br />
possess various interesting biological activities such as anti-inflammation, antioxidant, saliva, <strong>and</strong><br />
stomach juice inducing activity, analgesic, antigenotoxic, antimutagenic, anticarcinogenic, antirheunatoid<br />
arthritis, diabetic neuropathy, <strong>and</strong> used as food additives. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, because <strong>of</strong><br />
potent pungency <strong>and</strong> irritation on skin <strong>and</strong> mucous membrane, it has not yet been permitted as<br />
medicinal drug. In order to reduce this typical pungency <strong>and</strong> application <strong>of</strong> nonpungent capsaicin<br />
metabolites to the crude drug, capsaicin (596) (600 mg) including 30% <strong>of</strong> dihydrocapsaicin (600)<br />
was incubated in Czapek-peptone medium including Aspergillus niger for 7 days to give three<br />
metabolites, w1-hydroxylated capsaicin (597, 60.9%), 8,9-dihydro-w1-hydroxycapsaicin (598, 16%),<br />
<strong>and</strong> a carboxylic acid (599, 13.6%). All <strong>of</strong> the metabolites do not show pungency (Figure 15.166).<br />
Dihydrocapsaicin (600) was also treated in the same manner as described above to afford<br />
w1-hydroxydihyrocpsaicin (598, 80.9%) in high yield <strong>and</strong> the carboxylic acid (599, 5.0%). Capsaicin<br />
itself showed carbachol-induced contraction <strong>of</strong> 60% in the bronchus at a concentration <strong>of</strong> 1 m mol/L.<br />
11-Hydroxycapsicin (85) retained this activity <strong>of</strong> 60% at a concentration <strong>of</strong> 30 m mol/L.<br />
Dihydrocapsicin (600) showed the same activity <strong>of</strong> contraction in the bronchus, at the same concentration<br />
as that used in capsaicin. However, the activity <strong>of</strong> contraction in the bronchus <strong>of</strong> 11-hydroxy<br />
derivative (598) showed weaker (50% at 30 mmol/L) than that <strong>of</strong> the substrate. Since both<br />
metabolites (597 <strong>and</strong> 598) are tasteless, these products might be valuable for the crude drug<br />
although the contraction in the bronchus is weak. 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radicalscavenging<br />
activity test <strong>of</strong> capsaicin <strong>and</strong> dihydrocapsaicin derivatives was carried out. 11-Hydroxycapsaicin<br />
(597), 11-dihydrocapsaicin (598), <strong>and</strong> capsaicin (596) showed higher activity than<br />
(±)-a-tocopherol <strong>and</strong> 11-dihydroxycapsaicin (598) displayed the strong scavenging activity (IC 50<br />
50 mmol/L) (Hashimoto, Asakawa, unpublished results) (Figure 15.167).<br />
Shimoda et al. (2007a) reported the bioconversion <strong>of</strong> capsaicin (596) <strong>and</strong> 8-nordihydrocapsaicin<br />
(601) by the cultured cell <strong>of</strong> Catharathus roseus to give more water-soluble capsaicin derivatives.<br />
From capsaicin, three glycosides, capsaicin 4-O-b-d-glucopyranoside (602), which was one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
capsaicinoids in the fruit <strong>of</strong> Capsicum <strong>and</strong> showed 1/100 weaker pungency than capsaicin,<br />
4-O-(6- O-b-d-xylopyranosyl)-b-d-glucoside (603) <strong>and</strong> 4-O-(6-O-a-l-arbinosyl)-b-d-glucopyranoside<br />
(604) were obtained. 8-Nor-dihydrocapsaicin (601) was also incubated with the same cultured<br />
cell to afford the similar products (605–607) all <strong>of</strong> which reduced their pungency <strong>and</strong> enhanced<br />
water solubility. Since many synthetic capsaicin glycosides possess remarkable pharmacological<br />
activity, such as decrease <strong>of</strong> liver <strong>and</strong> serum lipids, the present products will be used for valuable<br />
prodrugs (Figure 15.168).
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 833<br />
MeO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
N<br />
H<br />
Dihydrocapsaicin (600)<br />
Aspergillus niger<br />
O<br />
MeO<br />
HO<br />
N<br />
H<br />
598<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
MeO<br />
COOH<br />
N<br />
H 599<br />
HO<br />
FIGURE 15.167 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> dihydrocapsaicin (600) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
HO<br />
H 3 CO<br />
H<br />
N<br />
596 O<br />
OH<br />
HO O O<br />
HO OH<br />
H 3 CO<br />
H<br />
N<br />
602 O<br />
HO O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
OH O<br />
HO O<br />
HO OH<br />
H 3 CO<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO OH O<br />
HO O<br />
HO OH<br />
H 3 CO<br />
H N<br />
603 O<br />
H<br />
N<br />
604 O<br />
HO<br />
H 3 CO<br />
H<br />
N<br />
601 O 605 O<br />
HO O<br />
O<br />
HO OH O<br />
HO OH HO<br />
O<br />
HO OH<br />
O O<br />
H<br />
H 3 CO<br />
HO OH N<br />
H 3 CO<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO OH O<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
HO OH<br />
H 3 CO<br />
FIGURE 15.168 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> capsaicin (596) <strong>and</strong> 8-nor-dihydrocapsaicin (601) by Catharanthus<br />
roseus cells.<br />
H<br />
N<br />
606 O<br />
H<br />
N<br />
607 O
834 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Zingiber <strong>of</strong>fi cinale contains various sesquiterpenoids <strong>and</strong> pungent aromatic compounds such as<br />
6-shogaol (608) <strong>and</strong> 6-gingerol (613) <strong>and</strong> their pungent compounds that possess cardio tonic <strong>and</strong><br />
sedative activity. 6-Shogaol (608) was incubated with Aspergillus niger in Czapek-peptone medium<br />
for 2 days to afford w1-hydroxy-6-shagaol (609, 9.9%), which was further converted to 8-hydroxy<br />
derivative (610, 16.1%), a g-lactone (611, 22.4%), <strong>and</strong> 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (612,<br />
48.5%) (Figure 15.169).<br />
MeO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
6<br />
7<br />
6-Shagol (608)<br />
Aspergillus niger<br />
2 days<br />
MeO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
6<br />
8<br />
7<br />
609 (9.9%)<br />
OH<br />
MeO<br />
HO<br />
COOH<br />
9<br />
612 (48.5%)<br />
MeO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
O 5<br />
8<br />
611 (22.4%)<br />
MeO<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
8<br />
610 (16.1%)<br />
5<br />
OH<br />
FIGURE 15.169 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 6-shogaol (608) by Aspergillus niger.<br />
MeO<br />
HO<br />
O OH<br />
6<br />
6-Gingerol (613)<br />
1<br />
A. niger<br />
A. niger<br />
MeO<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
6<br />
OH<br />
1<br />
MeO<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
6<br />
OH<br />
2<br />
HO<br />
614 (39.8%)<br />
HO<br />
615 (19.9%)<br />
MeO<br />
HO<br />
O OH<br />
6<br />
616 (14.5%)<br />
3<br />
COOH<br />
MeO<br />
HO<br />
O<br />
6<br />
617 (14.5%)<br />
1<br />
OH<br />
MeO<br />
O<br />
O<br />
6<br />
3<br />
O<br />
MeO<br />
OH<br />
8<br />
O<br />
O<br />
HO<br />
618 (16.9%) HO<br />
619 (21.1%)<br />
FIGURE 15.170 Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 6-gingerol (613) by Aspergillus niger.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 835<br />
6-Gingerol (613) (1 g) was treated in the same condition as mentioned above to yield six metabolites,<br />
w1-hydroxy-6-gingerol (614, 39.8%), its carboxylic derivative (616, 14.5%), a g-lactone (618)<br />
(16.9%) that might be formed from (616), its 8-hydoxy-g-lactone (619, 12.1%), w2-hydroxy-6-gingerol<br />
(615, 19.9%), <strong>and</strong> 6-deoxy-gingerol (617, 14.5%) (Takahashi et al., 1993).<br />
The metabolic pathway <strong>of</strong> 6-gingerol (613) resembles that <strong>of</strong> 6-shagaol (608). That <strong>of</strong> 6-shogaol<br />
<strong>and</strong> dihydrocapsaicin (600) is also similar since both substrates gave carboxylic acids as the final<br />
metabolites (Takahashi et al., 1993) (Figure 15.170).<br />
In conclusion, a number <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenoids were biotransformed by various fungi <strong>and</strong> mammals<br />
to afford many metabolites, several <strong>of</strong> which showed antimicrobial <strong>and</strong> antifungal, antiobesity,<br />
cytotoxic, neurotrophic, <strong>and</strong> enzyme inhibitory activity. Microorganisms introduce oxygen atom at<br />
allylic position to give secondary hydroxyl <strong>and</strong> keto groups. Double bond is also oxidized to give<br />
epoxide, followed by hydrolysis to afford a diol. These reactions precede stereo- <strong>and</strong> regiospecifically.<br />
Even at nonactivated carbon atom, oxidation reaction occurs to give primary alcohol. Some<br />
fungi like Aspergillus niger cleave the cyclopropane ring with a 1,1-dimethyl group. It is noteworthy<br />
that Aspergillus niger <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus cellulosae produce the totally different metabolites from the<br />
same substrates. Some fungi occurs reduction <strong>of</strong> carbonyl group, oxidation <strong>of</strong> aryl methyl group,<br />
phenyl coupling, <strong>and</strong> cyclization <strong>of</strong> a 10-membered ring sesquiterpenoids to give C6/C6- <strong>and</strong> C5/<br />
C7-cyclic or spiro compounds. Cytochrome P-450 is responsible for the introduction <strong>of</strong> oxygen<br />
function into the substrates.<br />
The present methods are very useful for the production <strong>of</strong> medicinal <strong>and</strong> agricultural drugs as<br />
well as fragrant components from commercially available cheap, natural, <strong>and</strong> unnatural terpenoids<br />
or a large amount <strong>of</strong> terpenoids from higher medicinal plants <strong>and</strong> spore-forming plants like liverworts<br />
<strong>and</strong> fungi.<br />
The methodology discussed in this chapter is a very simple one-step reaction in water, nonhazard,<br />
<strong>and</strong> very cheap, <strong>and</strong> it gives many valuable metabolites possessing different properties from<br />
those <strong>of</strong> the substrates.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Abraham, W.-R., P. Washausen, <strong>and</strong> K. Kieslich, 1987. Microbial hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> cedrol <strong>and</strong> cedrene.<br />
Z. Naturforsch., 42C: 414–419.<br />
Abraham, W.R., L. Ernst, <strong>and</strong> B. Stumpf, 1990. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> caryophyllene by Diplodia gossypina.<br />
Phytochemisrty, 29: 115–120.<br />
Abraham, W.-R., K. Kieslich, B. Stumpf, <strong>and</strong> L. Ernst, 1992. Microbial oxidation <strong>of</strong> tricyclic sesquiterpenoids<br />
containing a dimethylcyclopropane ring. Phytochemistry, 31: 3749–3755.<br />
Aleu, J., J.R. Hanson, R. Hern<strong>and</strong>ez-Galan, <strong>and</strong> I.G. Collado, 1999. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> the fungistatic<br />
sesquiterpenoid patchoulol by Botrytis cinerea. J. Nat. Prod., 62: 437–440.<br />
Aleu, J., R. Hern<strong>and</strong>ez-Galan, J.R. Hanson, P.B. Hitchcock, <strong>and</strong> I.G. Collado, 1999a. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
fungistatic sesquiterpenoid ginsenol by Botrytis cinerea. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans., 1: 727–730.<br />
Aleu, J., R. Hern<strong>and</strong>ez-Galan, <strong>and</strong> I.G. Collad, 2002. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> the fungistatic sesquiterpenoid<br />
isobotryan-9a-ol by Botrytis cinerea. J. Mol. Catal. B, 16: 249–253.<br />
Amate, A., A. Garcia-Granados, A. Martinez, et al., 1991. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 6a-eudesmanolides functionalized<br />
at C-3 with Curvularia lunata <strong>and</strong> Rhizopus nigricans cultures. Tetrahedron, 47: 5811–5818.<br />
Ar<strong>and</strong>a, G., M.S. Kortbi, J.-Y. Lallem<strong>and</strong>, et al., 1991. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> diterpenes: Hydroxylation<br />
<strong>of</strong> sclareol, manool <strong>and</strong> derivatives by Mucor plumbeus. Tetrahedron, 47: 8339–8350.<br />
Ar<strong>and</strong>a G., I. Facon, J.-Y. Lallem<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> M. Leclaire 1992. Microbiological hydroxylation in the drimane<br />
series. Tetrahedron Lett., 33, 7845–7848.<br />
Arantes, S.F., J.R. Hanson, <strong>and</strong> P.B. Hitchcok, 1999. The hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> the sesquiterpenoid valerianol by<br />
Mucor plumbeus. Phytochemistry, 52: 1063–1067.<br />
Asakawa, Y., 1982. Chemical constituents <strong>of</strong> the Hepaticae. In: Progress in the Chemistry <strong>of</strong> Organic Natural<br />
Products, W. Herz, H. Grisebach, <strong>and</strong> G.W. Kirby, eds, Vol. 42, pp. 1–285. Vienna: Springer.<br />
Asakawa, Y., 1995. Chemical constituents <strong>of</strong> the bryophytes. In: Progress in the Chemistry <strong>of</strong> Organic Natural<br />
Products; W. Herz, G.W. Kirby, R.E. Moore, W. Steglich, <strong>and</strong> Ch. Tamm, eds, Vol. 65, pp. 1–618. Vienna:<br />
Springer.
836 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Asakawa, Y., 1990. Terpenoids <strong>and</strong> aromatic compounds with pharmaceutical activity from bryophytes. In:<br />
Bryophytes: Their Chemistry <strong>and</strong> Chemical Taxonomy, D.H. Zinsmeister <strong>and</strong> R. Mues, eds, pp. 369–410.<br />
Oxford: Clarendon Press.<br />
Asakawa, Y., 1999. Phytochemistry <strong>of</strong> bryophytes. In: Phytochemicals in Human Health Protection, Nutrition,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Plant Defense, J. Romeo, ed., Vol. 33, pp. 319–342. New York: Kluwer Academic, Plenum Publishers.<br />
Asakawa, Y., 2007. Biologically active compounds from bryophytes. Pure Appl. Chem., 75: 557–580.<br />
Asakawa, Y., 2008. Recent advances <strong>of</strong> biologically active substances from the Marchantiophyta. Nat. Prod.<br />
Commun., 3: 77–92.<br />
Asakawa, Y., Z. Taira, T. Takemoto, T. Ishida, M. Kido, <strong>and</strong> Y. Ichikawa, 1981. X-ray crystal structure analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> 14-hydroxycaryophyllene oxide, a new metabolite <strong>of</strong> (-)-caryophyllene in rabbits. J. Pharm. Sci., 70:<br />
710–711.<br />
Asakawa, Y., T. Ishida, M. Toyota, <strong>and</strong> T. Takemoto, 1986. Terpenoid biotransformation in mammals IV.<br />
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-longifolene, (-)-caryophyllene, (-)-caryophyllene oxide, (-)-cyclocolorenone,<br />
(+)-nootkatone, (-)-elemol, (-)-abietic acid <strong>and</strong> (+)-dehydroabietic acid in rabbits. Xenobiotica, 6:<br />
753–767.<br />
Asakawa, Y., H. Takahashi, <strong>and</strong> M. Toyota, 1991. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> germacrane-type sesquiterpenoids by<br />
Aspergillus niger. Phytochemistry, 30: 3993–3997.<br />
Asakawa, Y., T. Hashimoto, Y. Mizuno, M. Tori, <strong>and</strong> Y. Fukuzawa, 1992. Cryptoporic acids A-G, drimane-type<br />
sesquiterpenoid ethers <strong>of</strong> isocitric acid from the fungus Cryptoporus volvatus. Phytochemistry, 31:<br />
579–592.<br />
Asakawa, Y. <strong>and</strong> A. Ludwiczuk, 2008. Bryophytes-Chemical diversity, bioactivity <strong>and</strong> chemosystematics.<br />
Part 1. Chemical diversity <strong>and</strong> bioactivity. Med. Plants Pol<strong>and</strong> World, 14: 33–53.<br />
Ata, A. <strong>and</strong> J.A. Nachtigall, 2004. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> a-santonin. Z. Naturforsch., 59C: 209–214.<br />
Atta-ur Rahman, M.I. Choudhary, A. Ata, et al., 1994. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> 7a-hydroxyfrullanolide.<br />
J. Nat. Prod., 57: 1251–1255.<br />
Atta-ur-Rahman, A. Farooq, <strong>and</strong> M.I. Choudhary, 1997. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> sclareolide. J. Nat. Prod.,<br />
60: 1038–1040.<br />
Atta-ur Rahman, M.I. Choudhary, F. Shaheen, A. Rauf, <strong>and</strong> A. Farooq, 1998. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> some<br />
bioactive natural products. Nat. Prod. Lett., 12: 215–222.<br />
Ayer, W.A. <strong>and</strong> P.A. Craw, 1989. Metabolites <strong>of</strong> fairy ring fungus, Marasmius oreades. Part 2. Norsesquiterpenes,<br />
further sesquiterpenes, <strong>and</strong> argocybin. Can. J. Chem., 67: 1371–1380.<br />
Bang, L. <strong>and</strong> G. Ourisson, 1975. Hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> cedrol by rabbits. Tetrahedron Lett., 16: 1881–1884.<br />
Bang, L., G. Ourisson, <strong>and</strong> P. Teisseire, 1975. Hydroxylation <strong>of</strong> patchoulol by rabbits. Hemisynthesis <strong>of</strong><br />
nor-patchoulenol, the odour carrier <strong>of</strong> patchouli oil. Tetrahedron Lett., 16: 2211–2214.<br />
Barrero, A.F., J.E. Oltra, D.S. Raslan, <strong>and</strong> D.A. Sade, 1999. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpene lactones<br />
by the fungi Cunninghamella echinulata <strong>and</strong> Rhizopus oryzae. J. Nat. Prod., 62: 726–729.<br />
Bhutani, K.K. <strong>and</strong> R.N. Thakur, 1991. The microbiological transformation <strong>of</strong> parthenin by Beauveria bassiana<br />
<strong>and</strong> Sporotrichum pulverulentum. Phytochemistry, 30: 3599–3600.<br />
Buchanan, G.O., L.A.D. Williams, <strong>and</strong> P.B. Reese, 2000. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> cadinane sesquiterpenes by<br />
Beauveria bassiana ATCC 7159. Phytochemistry, 54: 39–45.<br />
Choudhary, M.I., S.G. Musharraf, A. Sami, <strong>and</strong> Atta-ur-Rahman, 2004. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenes,<br />
(-)-ambrox® <strong>and</strong> (+)-sclareolide. Helv. Chim. Acta, 87: 2685–2694.<br />
Choudhary, M.I., S.G. Musharraf, S.A. Nawaz, et al., 2005. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-isolongifolol <strong>and</strong><br />
butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory activity <strong>of</strong> transformed products. Bioorg. Med. Chem., 13: 1939–1944.<br />
Choudhary, M.I., Z.A. Siddiqui, S.A. Nawaz, <strong>and</strong> Atta-ur-Rahman., 2006. Microbial transformation <strong>and</strong><br />
butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory activity <strong>of</strong> (-)-caryophyllene oxide <strong>and</strong> its derivatives. J. Nat. Prod., 69:<br />
1429–1434.<br />
Choudhary, M.I., W. Kausar, Z.A. Siddiqui, <strong>and</strong> Atta-ur-Rahman., 2006a. Microbial Metabolism <strong>of</strong><br />
(+)-Cycloisolongifol-5b-ol. Z. Naturforsch., 61B: 1035–1038.<br />
Clark, A.M. <strong>and</strong> C.D. Hufford, 1979. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> the sesquiterpene lactone costunolide.<br />
J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans., 1: 3022–3028.<br />
Collins, D.O. <strong>and</strong> P.B. Reese, 2002. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> cadina-4,10(15)-dien-3-one <strong>and</strong> 3a-hydroxycadina-<br />
4,10(15)-diene by Curvularia lunata ATCC 12017. Phytochemistry, 59: 489–492.<br />
Collins, D.O., P.L.D. Ruddock, J. Chiverton, C. de Grasse, W.F. Reynolds, <strong>and</strong> P.B. Reese, 2002. Microbial<br />
transformation <strong>of</strong> cadina-4,10(15)-dien-3-one, aromadendr-1(10)-en-9-one <strong>and</strong> methyl ursolate by<br />
Mucor plumbeus ATCC 4740. Phytochemistry, 59: 479–488.<br />
Collins, D.O., W.F. Reynold, <strong>and</strong> P.B. Reese, 2002. Aromadendrane transformations by Curvularia lunata<br />
ATCC 12017. Phytochemistry, 60: 475–481.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 837<br />
Daniewski, W.M., P.A. Grieco, J. Huffman, A. Rymkiewicz, <strong>and</strong> A. Wawrzun, 1981. Isolation <strong>of</strong> 12-hydroxycaryophyllene-4,5-oxide,<br />
a sesquitepene from Lactarius camphorates. Phytochemistry, 20: 2733–2734.<br />
Darrouzet, E., B. Mauchamp, G.D. Prestwich, L. Kerhoas, I. Ujvary, <strong>and</strong> F. Couillaud 1997. Hydroxy juvenile<br />
hormones: new putative juvenile hormones biosynthesized by locust corpora allata in vitro. Biochem.<br />
Biophys. Res. Commun., 240: 752–758.<br />
Devi, J.R., 1979. Microbiological transformation <strong>of</strong> terpenes: Part XXVI. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> caryophyllene.<br />
Ind. J. Biochem. Biophys., 16: 76–79.<br />
Dhavlikar, R.S. <strong>and</strong> G. Albroscheit, 1973. Microbiologische Umsetzung von Terpenen: Valencen. Dragoco<br />
Rep., 12: 250–258.<br />
Duran, R., E. Corrales, R. Hern<strong>and</strong>ez-Galan, <strong>and</strong> G. Collado, 1999. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> caryophyllene oxide<br />
by Botrytis cinerea. J. Nat. Prod., 62: 41–44.<br />
El Sayed, K.A., M. Yousaf, M.T. Hamann, M.A. Avery, M. Kelly, <strong>and</strong> P. Wipf, 2002. Microbial <strong>and</strong> chemical<br />
transformation studies <strong>of</strong> the bioactive marine sesquiterpenes (S)-(+)-curcuphenol <strong>and</strong> -curcudiol isolated<br />
from a deep reef collection <strong>of</strong> the Jamaican sponge Didiscus oxeata. J. Nat. Prod., 65: 1547–1553.<br />
Furusawa, M., Y. Noma, T. Hashimoto, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2003. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Citrus oil nootkatone,<br />
dihydronootkatone <strong>and</strong> dehydronootkatone. Proc. 47th TEAC: 142–144.<br />
Furusawa, M., T. Hashimoto, Y. Noma, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2005. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Citrus aromatics nootkatone<br />
<strong>and</strong> valencene by microorganisms. Chem. Pharm. Bull., 53: 1423–1429.<br />
Furusawa, M., T. Hashimoto, Y. Noma, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa 2005a. Highly efficient production <strong>of</strong> nootkatone, the<br />
grapefruit aroma from valencene, by biotransformation. Chem. Pharm. Bull., 53: 1513–1514.<br />
Furusawa, M., T. Hashimoto, Y. Noma, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2005b. The structure <strong>of</strong> new sesquiterpenoids from the<br />
liverwort Reboulia hemisphaerica <strong>and</strong> their biotransformation. Proc. 49th TEAC: 235–237.<br />
Furusawa, M., 2006. Microbial biotransformation <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenoids from crude drugs <strong>and</strong> liverworts:<br />
Production <strong>of</strong> functional substances. PhD thesis. Tokushima Bunri University, pp. 1–156.<br />
Furusawa, M., T. Hashimoto, Y. Noma, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2006a. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> aristolene- <strong>and</strong> 2,3-secoaromadendrane-type<br />
sesquiterpenoids having a 1,1-dimethylcyclopropane ring by Chlorella fusca var.<br />
vacuolata, Mucor species, <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus niger. Chem. Pharm. Bull., 54: 861–868.<br />
Furusawa, M., T. Hashimoto, Y. Noma, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2006b. Isolation <strong>and</strong> structures <strong>of</strong> new cyclomyltaylane<br />
<strong>and</strong> ent-chamigrane-type sesquiterpenoids from the liverwort Reboulia hemisphaerica. Chem. Pharm.<br />
Bull., 54: 996–1003.<br />
Furuya, T., Y. Asada, Y. Matsuura, S. Mizobata, <strong>and</strong> H. Hamada, 1997. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> b-thujaplicin by<br />
cultured cells <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus perriniana. Phytochemistry, 46: 1355–1358.<br />
Galal, A.M., A.S. Ibrahim, J.S. Mossa, <strong>and</strong> F.S. El-Feraly, 1999. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> parthenolide.<br />
Phytochemistry, 51: 761–765.<br />
Galal, A.M., 2001. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> pyrethrosin. J. Nat. Prod., 64: 1098–1099.<br />
Garcia-Granados, A., M.C. Gutierrez, F. Rivas, <strong>and</strong> J.M. Arias, 2001. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 4b-hydroxyeudesmane-<br />
1,6-dione by Gliocladium roseum <strong>and</strong> Exserohilum halodes. Phytochemistry, 58: 891–895.<br />
Hamada, H., F. Murakami, <strong>and</strong> T. Furuya, 1998. The production <strong>of</strong> hinokitiol glycoside. Proc. 42nd TEAC:<br />
145–147.<br />
Hanson, J.R. <strong>and</strong> H. Nasir, 1993. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> the sesquiterpenoid, cedrol, by Cephalosporium aphidicola.<br />
Phytochemistry, 33: 835–837.<br />
Hanson, J.R. <strong>and</strong> A. Truneh, 1996. The biotransformation <strong>of</strong> ambrox <strong>and</strong> sclareolide by Cephalosporium<br />
aphidicola. Phytochemistry, 42: 1021–1023.<br />
Hanson, R.L., J.M. Wasylyk, V.B. N<strong>and</strong>uri, D.L. Cazzulino, R.N. Patel, <strong>and</strong> L.J. Szarka, 1994. Site-specific<br />
enzymatic hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> tisanes at C-10 <strong>and</strong> C-13. J. Biol. Chem., 269: 22145–22149.<br />
Harinantenaina, L., Y. Noma, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2005. Penicillium sclerotiorum catalyzes the conversion <strong>of</strong> herbertenediol<br />
into its dimers: mastigophorenes A <strong>and</strong> B. Chem. Pharm. Bull., 53: 256–257.<br />
Harinantenaina, L., D.N. Quang, T. Nishizawa, et al., 2007. Bioactive compounds from liverworts: Inhibition<br />
<strong>of</strong> lipopolysaccharide-induced inducible NOS mRNA in RAW 264.7 cells by herbertenoids <strong>and</strong> cuparenoids.<br />
Phytomedicine, 14: 486–491.<br />
Hashimoto, T., S. Kato, M. Tanaka, S. Takaoka, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1998. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenoids<br />
by microorganisms (4): Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> hinesol by Aspergillus niger. Proc. 42nd TEAC:<br />
127–129.<br />
Hashimoto, T., K. Shiki, M. Tanaka, S. Takaoka, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1998a. Chemical conversion <strong>of</strong> labdane-type<br />
diterpenoid isolated from the liverwort Porella perrottetiana into (-)-ambrox. Heterocycles, 49:<br />
315–325.<br />
Hashimoto, T., Y. Noma, Y. Akamatsu, M. Tanaka, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1999. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenoids<br />
by microorganisms. (5): Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> dehydrocostuslactone. Proc. 43rd TEAC: 202–204.
838 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Hashimoto, T., Y. Noma, Y. Matsumoto, Y. Akamatsu, M. Tanaka, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1999a. Biotransformation<br />
<strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenoids by microorganisms. (6): Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> a-, b- <strong>and</strong> g-cyclocostunolides. Proc.<br />
43rd TEAC: 205–207.<br />
Hashimoto, T., Y. Noma, S. Kato, M. Tanaka, S. Takaoka, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1999b. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> hinesol<br />
isolated from the crude drug Atractylodes lancea by Aspergillus niger <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus cellulosae. Chem.<br />
Pharm. Bull., 47: 716–717.<br />
Hashimoto, T., Y. Noma, H. Matsumoto, Y. Tomita, M. Tanaka, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2000. Microbial biotransformation<br />
<strong>of</strong> optically active (+)-a-ionone <strong>and</strong> (-)-a-ionone. Proc. 44th TEAC: 154–156.<br />
Hashimoto, T., Y. Noma, C. Murakami, M. Tanaka, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2000a. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> a-santonin<br />
derivatives <strong>and</strong> nootkatone. Proc. 44th TEAC: 157–159.<br />
Hashimoto, T., Y. Noma, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2001. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> terpenoids from the crude drugs <strong>and</strong><br />
animal origin by microorganisms. Heterocycles, 54: 529–559.<br />
Hashimoto, T., Y. Noma, C. Murakami, N. Nishimatsu, M. Tanaka, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2001a. Biotransformation<br />
<strong>of</strong> valencene <strong>and</strong> aristolene. Proc. 45th TEAC: 345–347.<br />
Hashimoto, T., Y. Asakawa, Y. Noma, et al., 2003. Production method <strong>of</strong> nootkatone. Jpn. Kokai Tokkyo Koho,<br />
250591A.<br />
Hashimoto, T., Y. Asakawa, Y. Noma, et al., 2003a. Production method <strong>of</strong> nootkatone. Jpn. Kokai Tokkyo Koho,<br />
70492A.<br />
Hashimoto, T., Y. Noma, N. Nishimatsu, M. Sekita, M. Tanaka, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2003b. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong><br />
antimalarial sesquiterpenoids by microorganisms. Proc. 47th TEAC: 136–138.<br />
Hashimoto, T., Y. Noma, Y. Goto, S. Takaoka, M. Tanaka, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2003c. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenoids<br />
from the liverwort Plagiochila species. Proc. 47th TEAC: 139–141.<br />
Hashimoto, T., Y. Noma, Y. Goto, M. Tanaka, S. Takaoka, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2004. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-maalioxide<br />
by Aspergillus niger <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus cellulosae. Heterocycles, 62: 655–666.<br />
Hashimoto, T., M. Sekita, M. Furusawa, Y. Noma, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2005. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpene<br />
lactones, (-)-parthenolide <strong>and</strong> (-)-frullanolide by microorganisms. Proc. 49th TEAC: 387–389.<br />
Hashimoto, T., Y. Noma, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2006. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> cuparane- <strong>and</strong> herbertane-type sesquiterpenoids.<br />
Proc. 50th TEAC: 263–265.<br />
Hashimoto, T. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2007. Biological activity <strong>of</strong> fragrant substances from Citrus <strong>and</strong> herbs, <strong>and</strong><br />
production <strong>of</strong> functional substances using microbial biotransformation. In: Development <strong>of</strong> Medicinal<br />
Foods; M. Yoshikawa, ed., pp. 168–184. Tokyo: CMC Publisher.<br />
Hashimoto, T., M. Fujiwara, K. Yoshikawa, A. Umeyama, M. Tanaka, <strong>and</strong> Y. Noma, 2007. Biotransformation<br />
<strong>of</strong> sclareolide <strong>and</strong> sclareol by microorganisms. Proc. 51st TEAC: 316–318.<br />
Hayashi, K., H. Morikawa, H. Nozaki, <strong>and</strong> D. Takaoka, 1998. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> globulol <strong>and</strong> epiglubulol<br />
by Aspergillus niger IFO 4407. Proc. 42nd TEAC: 136–138.<br />
Hayashi, K., H. Morikawa, A. Matsuo, D. Takaoka, <strong>and</strong> H. Nozaki, 1999. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenoids<br />
by Aspergillus niger IFO 4407. Proc. 43rd TEAC: 208–210.<br />
Haze, S., K. Sakai, <strong>and</strong> Y. Gozu, 2002. Effects <strong>of</strong> fragrance inhalation on sympathetic activity in normal adults.<br />
Jpn. J. Pharmacol., 90: 247–253.<br />
Hegazy, M.-E.F., C. Kuwata, Y. Sato, et al., 2005. Research <strong>and</strong> development <strong>of</strong> asymmetric reaction using<br />
biocatalysts-biotransformation <strong>of</strong> enones by cultured cells <strong>of</strong> Marchantia polymorpha. Proc. 49th TEAC:<br />
402–404.<br />
Higuchi, H., R. Tsuji, K. Hayashi, D. Takaoka, A. Matsuo, <strong>and</strong> H. Nozaki, 2001. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenoids<br />
by Aspergillus niger. Proc. 45th TEAC: 354–355.<br />
Hikino, H., T. Konno, T. Nagashima, T. Kohama, <strong>and</strong> T. Takemoto, 1971. Stereoselective epoxidation <strong>of</strong><br />
germacrone by Cunninghamella blakesleeana. Tetrahedron Lett., 12: 337–340.<br />
Hrdlicka, P.J., A.B. Sorensen, B.R. Poulsen, G.J.G. Ruijter, J. Visser, <strong>and</strong> J.J. L. Iversen 2004. Characterization<br />
<strong>of</strong> nerolidol biotransformation based on indirect on-line estimation <strong>of</strong> biomass concentration <strong>and</strong> physiological<br />
state in bath cultures <strong>of</strong> Aspergillus niger. Biotech. Prog., 20: 368–376.<br />
Ishida, T., Y. Asakawa, T. Takemoto, <strong>and</strong> T. Aratani, 1981. Terpenoid biotransformation in mammals.<br />
III. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> a-pinene, b-pinene, pinane, 3-carene, carane, myrcene <strong>and</strong> p-cymene in rabbits.<br />
J. Pharm. Sci., 70: 406–415.<br />
Ishida, T., Y. Asakawa, <strong>and</strong> T. Takemoto, 1982. Hydroxyisolongifolaldehyde: A new metabolite <strong>of</strong> (+)-longifolene<br />
in rabbits. J. Pharm. Sci., 71: 965–966.<br />
Ishida, T., 2005. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> terpenoids by mammals, microorganisms, <strong>and</strong> plant-cultured cells.<br />
Chem. Biodivers., 2: 569–590.<br />
Itsuzaki, Y., K. Ishisaka, <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2002. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-cedrol by using human skin microbial<br />
flora Staphylococcus epidermidis. Proc. 46th TEAC: 101–102.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 839<br />
Jacobsson, U., V. Kumar, <strong>and</strong> S. Saminathan, 1995. Sesquiterpene lactones from Michelia champaca.<br />
Phytochemistry, 39: 839–843.<br />
Kaspera, R., U. Krings, T. Nanzad, <strong>and</strong> R.G. Berger, 2005. Bioconversion <strong>of</strong> (+)-valencene in submerged cultures<br />
<strong>of</strong> the ascomycete Chaetomium globosum. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 67: 477–583.<br />
Kiran, I., H.N. Yildirim, J.R. Hanson, <strong>and</strong> P.B. Hitchcock, 2004. The antifungal activity <strong>and</strong> biotransformation<br />
<strong>of</strong> diisophorone by the fungus Aspergillus niger. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 79: 1366–1370.<br />
Kiran, I., T. Akar, A. Gorgulu, <strong>and</strong> C. Kazaz, 2005. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> racemic diisophorone by<br />
Cephalosporium aphidicola <strong>and</strong> Neurospora crassa. Biotechnol. Lett., 27: 1007–1010.<br />
Kumari, G.N.K., S. Masilamani, R. Ganesh, <strong>and</strong> S. Aravind, 2003. Microbial biotransformation <strong>of</strong> zaluzanin D.<br />
Phytochemistry, 62: 1101–1104.<br />
Lahlou, E.L., Y. Noma, T. Hashimoto, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2000. Microbiotransformation <strong>of</strong> dehydropinguisenol<br />
by Aspergillus sp. Phytochemistry, 54: 455–460.<br />
Lamare, V. <strong>and</strong> R. Furstoss, 1990. Bioconversion <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenes. Tetrahedron, 46: 4109–4132.<br />
Lee, I.-S., H.N. ElSohly, E.M. Coroom, <strong>and</strong> C.D. Hufford, 1989. Microbial metabolism studies <strong>of</strong> the antimalarial<br />
sesquiterpene artemisinin. J. Nat. Prod., 52: 337–341.<br />
Ma, X.C., M. Ye, L.J. Wu, <strong>and</strong> D.A. Guo, 2006. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> curdione by Mucor spinosus.<br />
Enzyme Microb. Technol., 38: 367–371.<br />
Maatooq, G.T., 2002. Microbial metabolism <strong>of</strong> partheniol by Mucor circinelloides. Phytochemistry, 59: 39–44.<br />
Maatooq, G.A., 2002a. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> a b- <strong>and</strong> g-eudesmols mixture. Z. Naturforsch., 57C:<br />
654–659.<br />
Maatooq, G.A., 2002b. Microbial conversion <strong>of</strong> partheniol by Calonectria decora. Z. Naturforsch., 57C:<br />
680–685.<br />
Madyastha, K.M. <strong>and</strong> T.L. Gururaja, 1993. Utility <strong>of</strong> microbes in organic synthesis: Selective transformations<br />
<strong>of</strong> acyclic isoprenoids by Aspergillus niger. Ind. J. Chem., 32B: 609–614.<br />
Matsui, H., Y. Minamino, <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 1999. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-cedryl acetate by Glomerella<br />
cingulata, parasitic fungus. Proc. 43rd TEAC: 215–216.<br />
Matsui, H. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2000. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> pathouli acetate suing parasitic fungus Glomerella<br />
cingulata as a biocatalyst. Proc. 44th TEAC: 149–150.<br />
Matsushima, A., M.-E.F. Hegazy, C. Kuwata, Y. Sato, M. Otsuka, <strong>and</strong> T. Hirata, 2004. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong><br />
enones using plant cultured cells-the reduction <strong>of</strong> a-santonin. Proc. 48th TEAC: 396–398.<br />
Meyer, P. <strong>and</strong> C. Neuberg 1915. Phytochemische reduktionen. XII. Die umw<strong>and</strong>lung von citronellal in citronelol.<br />
Biochem. Z., 71: 174–179.<br />
Mikami, Y., 1988. Microbial conversion <strong>of</strong> terpenoids. Biotechnology <strong>and</strong> Genetic Engineering Reviews, Vol. 6,<br />
pp. 271–320. Wimborne, UK: Intercept Ltd.<br />
Miyazawa, M., T. Uemura, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1994. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenoids, (-)-globulol <strong>and</strong><br />
(+)-ledol by Glomerella cingulata. Phytochemistry, 37: 1027–1030.<br />
Miyazawa, M., H. Nakai, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1995. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-cedrol by plant pathogenic fungus,<br />
Glomerella cingulata. Phytochemistry, 40: 69–72.<br />
Miyazawa, M., T. Uemura, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1995a. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenoids, (+)-aromadendrene<br />
<strong>and</strong> (-)-alloaromadendrene by Glomerella cingulata. Phytochemistry, 40: 793–796.<br />
Miyazawa, M., H. Nankai, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1995b. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-a-bisabolol by plant pathogenic<br />
fungus, Glomerella cingulata. Phytochemistry, 39: 1077–1080.<br />
Miyazawa, M., H. Nakai, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1995c. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> cyclic terpenoids, (±)-cis-nerolidol<br />
<strong>and</strong> nerylacetone, by plant pathogenic fungus, Glomerella cingulata. Phytochemistry, 40: 1133–1137.<br />
Miyazawa, M., Y. Honjo, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1996. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> guaiol <strong>and</strong> bulnesol using plant pathogenic<br />
fungus Glomerella cingulata as a biocatalyst. Proc. 40th TEAC: 82–83.<br />
Miyazawa, M., H. Nakai, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1996a. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> acyclic terpenoid (±)-trans-nerolidol<br />
<strong>and</strong> geranylacetone by Glomerella cingulata. J. Agric. Food Chem., 44: 1543–1547.<br />
Miyazawa, M., H. Nakai, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1996b. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> acyclic terpenoid (2E,6E)-farnesol by<br />
plant pathogenic fungus Glomerella cingulata. Phytochemistry, 43: 105–109.<br />
Miyazawa, M., S. Akazawa, H. Sakai, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1997. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-g-gurjunene using<br />
plant pathogenic fungus, Glomerella cingulata as a biocatalyst. Proc. 41st TEAC: 218–219.<br />
Miyazawa, M., Y. Honjo, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1997a. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> the sesquiterpenoid b-selinene using<br />
the plant pathogenic fungus Glomerella cingulata. Phytochemistry, 44: 433–436.<br />
Miyazawa, M., H. Matsui, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1997b. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> patchouli alcohol using plant parasitic<br />
fungus Glomerella cingulata as a biocatalyst. Proc. 41st TEAC: 220–221.<br />
Miyazawa, M., Y. Honjo, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1998. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> the sesquiterpenoid (+)-g-gurjunene<br />
using a plant pathogenic fungus Glomerella cingulata as a biocatalyst. Phytochemistry, 49: 1283–1285.
840 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Miyazawa, M., H. Matsui, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1998a. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> unsaturated sesquiterpene alcohol<br />
using plant parasitic fungus, Glomerella cingulata as a biocatalyst. Proc. 42nd TEAC: 121–122.<br />
Miyazawa, M. <strong>and</strong> A. Sugawara, 2006. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (2)-guaiol by Euritium rubrum. Nat. Prod. Res.,<br />
20: 731–734.<br />
Morikawa, H., K. Hayashi, K. Wakamatsu et al., 2000. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenoids by Aspergillus<br />
niger IFO 4407. Proc. 44th TEAC: 151–153.<br />
Nankai, H., M. Miyazawa, <strong>and</strong> H. Kameoka, 1996. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (Z,Z)-farnesol using plant pathogenic<br />
fungus, Glomerella cingulata as a biocatalyst. Proc. 40th TEAC: 78–79.<br />
Nishida, E. <strong>and</strong> Y. Kawai, 2007. Bioconversion <strong>of</strong> zerumbone <strong>and</strong> its derivatives. Proc. 51st TEAC: 387–389.<br />
Noma, Y., T. Hashimoto, A. Kikkawa, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1996. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-a-eudesmol by Asp.<br />
niger <strong>and</strong> Asp. cellulosae M-77. Proc. 40th TEAC: 95–97.<br />
Noma, Y., T. Hashimoto, S. Kato, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1997. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-b-eudesmol by Aspergillus<br />
niger. Proc. 41st TEAC: 224–226.<br />
Noma, Y., K. Matsueda, I. Maruyama, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1997a. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> terpenoids <strong>and</strong> related<br />
compounds by Chlorella species. Proc. 41st TEAC: 227–229.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1998. Microbiological transformation <strong>of</strong> 3-oxo-a-ionone. Proc. 44th TEAC:<br />
133–135.<br />
Noma, Y. <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2006. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (-)-nopol benzyl ether. Proc 50th TEAC, 434–436.<br />
Noma, Y., T. Hashimoto, Y. Akamatsu, S. Takaoka, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1999. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> adamantane<br />
(Part 1). Proc. 43rd TEAC: 199–201.<br />
Noma, Y., M. Furusawa, C. Murakami, T. Hashimoto, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2001. Formation <strong>of</strong> nootkatol <strong>and</strong> nootkatone<br />
from valencene by soil microorganisms. Proc. 45th TEAC: 91–92.<br />
Noma, Y., T. Hashimoto, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2001a. Microbiological transformation <strong>of</strong> damascone. Proc. 45th<br />
TEAC: 93–95.<br />
Noma, Y., T. Hashimoto, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2001b. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> adamantane. Proc. 45th TEAC:<br />
96–98.<br />
Noma, Y., T. Hashimoto, S. Sawada, T. Kitayama, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2002. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> zerumbone.<br />
Proc. 46th TEAC: 313–315.<br />
Noma, Y., Y. Takahashi, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2003. Stereoselective reduction <strong>of</strong> racemic bicycle[33.1]nonane-2,6-<br />
dione <strong>and</strong> 5-hydroxy-2-adamantanone by microorganisms. Proc. 46th TEAC: 118–120.<br />
Nozaki, H., K. Asano, K. Hayashi, M. Tanaka, A. Masuo, <strong>and</strong> D. Takaoka, 1996. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> shiromodiol<br />
diacetate <strong>and</strong> myli-4(15)-en-9-one by Aspergillus niger IFO 4407. Proc. 40th TEAC: 108–110.<br />
Okuda, M., K. Sonohara, <strong>and</strong> H. Takikawa, 1994. Production <strong>of</strong> natural flavors by laccase catalysis. Jpn. Kokai<br />
Tokkyo Koho, 303967.<br />
Orabi, K.Y., 2000. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> the eudesmane sesquiterpene plectranthone. J. Nat. Prod., 63:<br />
1709–1711.<br />
Orabi, K.Y., 2001. Microbial epoxidation <strong>of</strong> the tricyclic sesquiterpene presilphiperfolane angelate ester.<br />
Z. Naturforsch., 56C: 223–227.<br />
Otsuka, S. <strong>and</strong> K. Tani, 1991. Catalytic asymmetric hydrogen migration <strong>of</strong> ally amines. Synthesis: 665–680.<br />
Parshikov, I.A., K.M. Muraleedharan, <strong>and</strong> M.A. Avery, 2004. Transformation <strong>of</strong> artemisinin by Cunninghamella<br />
elegans. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 64: 782–786.<br />
Sakamoto, S., N. Tsuchiya, M. Kuroyanagi, <strong>and</strong> A. Ueno, 1994. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> germacrone by suspension<br />
cultured cells. Phytochemistry, 35: 1215–1219.<br />
Sakata, K. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2006. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-isolongifolen-9-one by Glomerella cingulata as<br />
a biocatalyst. Proc. 50th TEAC: 258–260.<br />
Sakata, K., I. Horibe, <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2007. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-a-longipinene by microorganisms as<br />
a biocatalyst. Proc. 51st TEAC: 321–322.<br />
Sakui, N., M. Kuroyanagi, M. Sato, <strong>and</strong> A. Ueno, 1988. Transformation <strong>of</strong> ten-membered sesquiterpenes by<br />
callus <strong>of</strong> Curcuma. Proc. 32nd TEAC: 322–324.<br />
Sakui, N., M. Kuroyamagi, Y. Ishitobi, M. Sato, <strong>and</strong> A. Ueno, 1992. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenes by<br />
cultured cells <strong>of</strong> Curcuma zedoaria. Phytochemistry, 31: 143–147.<br />
Salvador, J.A.R. <strong>and</strong> J.H. Clark, 2002. The allylic oxidation <strong>of</strong> unsaturated steroids by tert-butyl hydroperoxide<br />
using surface functionalized silica supported metal catalysts. Green Chem., 4: 352–356.<br />
Sekita, M., M. Furusawa, T. Hashimoto, Y. Noma, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2005. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> pungent tasting<br />
polygidial from Polygonum hydropiper <strong>and</strong> related compounds by microorganisms. Proc. 49th TEAC:<br />
380–381.<br />
Sekita, M., T. Hashimoto, Y. Noma, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 2006. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> biologically active terpenoids,<br />
sacculatal <strong>and</strong> cinnamodial by microorganisms. Proc. 50th TEAC: 406–408.
Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> Compounds by Green Algae, Fungi, <strong>and</strong> Mammals 841<br />
Shimoda, K., Y. Kondo, T. Nishida, H. Hamada, N. Nakajima, <strong>and</strong> H. Hamada, 2006. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong><br />
thymol, carvacrol, <strong>and</strong> eugenol by cultured cells <strong>of</strong> Eucalyptus perriniana. Phytochemistry, 67:<br />
2256–2261.<br />
Shimoda, K., T. Harada, H. Hamada, N. Nakajima, <strong>and</strong> H. Hamda, 2007. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> raspberry ketone<br />
<strong>and</strong> zingerone by cultured cells <strong>of</strong> Phytolacca americana. Phytochemistry, 68: 487–492.<br />
Shimoda, K., S. Kwon, A. Utsuki, et al., 2007a. Glycosylation <strong>of</strong> capsaicin <strong>and</strong> 8-norhydrocapsaicin by cultured<br />
cells <strong>of</strong> Catharanthus roseus. Phytochemistry, 68: 1391–1396.<br />
Shoji, N., A. Umeyama, Y. Asakawa, T. Takeout, K. Nocoton, <strong>and</strong> Y. Ohizumi, 1984. Structure determination <strong>of</strong><br />
nootkatol, a new sesquiterpene isolated form Alpinia oxyphylla Miquel possessing calcium antagonist<br />
activity. J. Pharm. Sci., 73: 843–844.<br />
Sowden, R.J., S. Yasmin, N.H. Rees, S.G. Bell, <strong>and</strong> L.-L. Wong, 2005. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> the sesquiterpene<br />
(+)-valencene by cytochrome P450 cam <strong>and</strong> P450 BM-3 . Org. Biomol. Chem., 3: 57–64.<br />
Sugawara, A. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2004. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> guaiene using plant pathogenic fungus, Eurotium<br />
rubrum as a biocatalyst. Proc. 48th TEAC: 385–386.<br />
Sutherl<strong>and</strong>, T.D., G.C. Unnithan, J.F. Andersen, et al., 1998. A cytochrome P450 terpenoid hydroxylase linked<br />
to the suppression <strong>of</strong> insect juvenile hormone synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 12884–12889.<br />
Takahashi, H., 1994. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> terpenoids <strong>and</strong> aromatic compounds by some microorganisms. PhD<br />
thesis. Tokushima Bunri University, pp. 1–115.<br />
Takahashi, H., T. Hashimoto, Y. Noma, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1993. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> 6-gingerol, <strong>and</strong> 6-shogaol<br />
by Aspergillus niger. Phytochemistry, 34: 1497–1500.<br />
Takahashi, H., M. Toyota, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1993a. Drimane-type sesquiterpenoids from Cryptoporus volvatus<br />
infected by Paecilomyces varioti. Phytochemistry, 33: 1055–1059.<br />
Takahashi, T. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2005. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> (+)-nootkatone by Aspergillus wentii, as biocatalyst.<br />
Proc. 49th TEAC: 393–394.<br />
Takahashi, T. <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2006. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> sesquiterpenes which possess an eudesmane<br />
skeleton by microorganisms. Proc. 50th TEAC: 256–257.<br />
Takahashi, T., I. Horibe, <strong>and</strong> M. Miyazawa, 2007. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> b-selinene by Aspergillus wentii. Proc.<br />
51st TEAC: 319–320.<br />
Tani, K., T. Yamagata, S. Otsuka, et al., 1982. Cationic rhodium (I) complex-catalyzed asymmetric isomerization<br />
<strong>of</strong> allylamines to optically active enamines. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun.: 600–601.<br />
Tori, M., M. Sono, <strong>and</strong> Y. Asakawa, 1990. The reaction <strong>of</strong> three sesquiterpene ethers with m-chloroperbenzoic<br />
acid. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 63: 1770–1776.<br />
Venkateswarlu, Y., P. Ramesh, P.S. Reddy, <strong>and</strong> K. Jamil, 1999. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> D 9(15) -africane.<br />
Phytochemistry, 52: 1275–1277.<br />
Wang, Y., T.-K. Tan, G.K. Tan, J.D. Connolly, <strong>and</strong> L.J. Harrison, 2006. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> the sesquiterpenoid<br />
(-)-maalioxide by Mucor plumbeus. Phytochemistry, 67: 58–61.<br />
Wilson, C.W. III <strong>and</strong> P. E. Saw, 1978. Quantitative composition <strong>of</strong> cold-pressed grapefruit oil. J. Agric. Food<br />
Chem., 26: 1430–1432.<br />
Yang, L., K. Fujii, J. Dai, J. Sakai, <strong>and</strong> M. Ando, 2003. Biotransformation <strong>of</strong> a-santonin <strong>and</strong> its C-6 epimer by<br />
fungus <strong>and</strong> plant cell cultures. Proc. 47th TEAC: 148–150.<br />
Zhan, J., H. Guo, J. Dai, Y. Zhang, <strong>and</strong> D. Guo, 2002. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> artemisinin by Cunninghamella<br />
echinulata <strong>and</strong> Aspergillus niger. Tetrahedron Lett., 43: 4519–4521.<br />
Zundel, J.-L., 1976. PhD thesis. Universite Louis Pasteur. Strasbourg, France.
16<br />
Industrial Uses <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
W. S. Brud<br />
CONTENTS<br />
16.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 843<br />
16.2 The History ..................................................................................................................... 843<br />
16.3 Fragrances ....................................................................................................................... 844<br />
16.4 Flavors ............................................................................................................................. 845<br />
16.5 Production <strong>and</strong> Consumption .......................................................................................... 846<br />
16.6 Changing Trends ............................................................................................................. 849<br />
16.7 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 853<br />
Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................................... 853<br />
References ................................................................................................................................. 853<br />
Further Reading ......................................................................................................................... 853<br />
Web Sites .................................................................................................................................... 853<br />
16.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
The period when essential oils were used first on an industrial scale is difficult to identify. The nineteenth<br />
century is generally regarded as the commencement <strong>of</strong> the modern phase <strong>of</strong> industrial application<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils. However, the large-scale usage <strong>of</strong> essential oils dates back to ancient Egypt.<br />
In 1480 bc, Queen Hatshepsut <strong>of</strong> Egypt sent an expedition to the country <strong>of</strong> Punt (now Somalia) to<br />
collect fragrant plants, oils, <strong>and</strong> resins as ingredients for perfumes, medicaments, <strong>and</strong> flavors <strong>and</strong><br />
for the mummification <strong>of</strong> bodies. Precious fragrances have been found in many Egyptian archeological<br />
excavations, as a symbol <strong>of</strong> wealth <strong>and</strong> social position.<br />
If significant international trade <strong>of</strong> essential oil-based products is the criterion for industrial use,<br />
“Queen <strong>of</strong> Hungary Water” was the first alcoholic perfume in history. This fragrance, based on rosemary<br />
essential oil distillate, was created in the mid-fourteenth century for the Polish-born Queen<br />
Elisabeth <strong>of</strong> Hungary. Following a special presentation to King Charles V, The Wise <strong>of</strong> France in 1350,<br />
it became popular in all medieval European courts. The beginning <strong>of</strong> the eighteenth century saw the<br />
introduction <strong>of</strong> “Eau de Cologne,” based on bergamot <strong>and</strong> other citrus oils, which remains widely<br />
used to this day. This fresh citrus fragrance was the creation <strong>of</strong> Jean Maria Farina, a descendant <strong>of</strong><br />
Italian perfumers who came to France with Catherine de Medici <strong>and</strong> settled in Grasse in the sixteenth<br />
century. According to the city <strong>of</strong> Cologne archives, Jean Maria Farina <strong>and</strong> Karl Hieronymus Farina, in<br />
1749, established factory (Fabriek) <strong>of</strong> this water, which sounds very “industrial.” The “Kölnisch<br />
Wasser” became the first unisex fragrance rather than one simply for men, known <strong>and</strong> used all over<br />
Europe, <strong>and</strong> it has been repeated subsequently in innumerable countertypes as a fragrance for men.<br />
843
844 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
16.2 THE HISTORY<br />
The history <strong>of</strong> production <strong>of</strong> essential oils dates back to ca. 3500 bc when the oldest known water distillation<br />
equipment for essential oils was employed, <strong>and</strong> may be seen today in the Texila museum in<br />
Pakistan. Ancient India, China, <strong>and</strong> Egypt were the locations where essential oils were produced <strong>and</strong><br />
widely used as medicaments, flavors, <strong>and</strong> fragrances. Perfumes came to Europe most probably from the<br />
East at the time <strong>of</strong> the crusades, <strong>and</strong> perfumery was accorded a pr<strong>of</strong>essional status by the approval <strong>of</strong> a<br />
French guild <strong>of</strong> perfumers in Grasse by King Philippe August in 1190. For centuries, Grasse remained<br />
the center <strong>of</strong> world perfumery <strong>and</strong> was also the home <strong>of</strong> the first ever <strong>of</strong>ficially registered essential oilsproducing<br />
company—Antoine Chiris—in 1768. (It is worth noting that not much later, in 1798, the first<br />
American essential oil company—Dodge <strong>and</strong> Olcott Inc.—was established in New York.)<br />
About 150 years earlier, in 1620, an Englishman, named Yardley, obtained a concession from<br />
King Charles I to manufacture soap for the London area. Details <strong>of</strong> this event are sparse, other than<br />
the high fee paid by Yardley for this privilege. Importantly, however, Yardley’s soap was perfumed<br />
with English lavender, which remains the Yardley trademark today, <strong>and</strong> it was probably the first<br />
case <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> an essential oil as a fragrance in large-scale soap production.<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> essential oils as food ingredients has a history dating back to ancient times. There are<br />
many examples <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> citrus <strong>and</strong> other squeezed (manually or mechanically expressed) oils<br />
for sweets <strong>and</strong> desserts in ancient Egypt, Greece, <strong>and</strong> the Roman Empire. Numerous references<br />
exist to flavored ice creams in the courts <strong>of</strong> the Roman Emperor Nero <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> China. The reintroduction<br />
<strong>of</strong> recipes in Europe is attributed to Marco Polo on his return from traveling to China. In other<br />
stories, Catherine de Medici introduced ice creams in France, whereas Charles I <strong>of</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong> served<br />
the first dessert in the form <strong>of</strong> frozen cream. Ice was used for freezing drinks <strong>and</strong> food in many civilizations<br />
<strong>and</strong> the Eastern practice <strong>of</strong> using spices <strong>and</strong> spice essential oils both as flavoring ingredients<br />
<strong>and</strong> as food conservation agents was adopted centuries ago in Europe.<br />
Whatever may be regarded as the date <strong>of</strong> their industrial production, essential oils, together with<br />
a range <strong>of</strong> related products—pomades, tinctures, resins, absolutes, extracts, distillates, concretes,<br />
<strong>and</strong> so on—were the only ingredients <strong>of</strong> flavor <strong>and</strong> fragrance products until the late nineteenth century.<br />
At this stage, the growth in consumption <strong>of</strong> essential oils as odoriferous <strong>and</strong> flavoring materials<br />
stimulated the emergence <strong>of</strong> a great number <strong>of</strong> manufacturers in France, the United Kingdom,<br />
Germany, Switzerl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> the United States (Table 16.1).<br />
The rapid development <strong>of</strong> the fragrance <strong>and</strong> flavor industry in the nineteenth century was generally<br />
based on essential oils <strong>and</strong> related natural products. In 1876, however, Haarman <strong>and</strong> Reimer<br />
started the first production <strong>of</strong> synthetic aroma chemicals—vanillin, then coumarin, anisaldehyde,<br />
heliotropin, <strong>and</strong> terpineol. Although aroma chemicals made a revolution in fragrances with top<br />
discoveries in the twentieth century, for many decades both flavors <strong>and</strong> fragrances were manufactured<br />
with constituents <strong>of</strong> natural origin, the majority <strong>of</strong> which were essential oils.<br />
16.3 FRAGRANCES<br />
The main reason for the expansion <strong>of</strong> the essential oils industry <strong>and</strong> the growing dem<strong>and</strong> for products<br />
was the development <strong>of</strong> the food, soap, <strong>and</strong> cosmetics industries. Today’s multinational companies,<br />
the main users <strong>of</strong> fragrances <strong>and</strong> flavors, have evolved directly from the developments during<br />
the mid-nineteenth century.<br />
In 1806, William Colgate opened his first store for soaps, c<strong>and</strong>les, <strong>and</strong> laundry starch on Dutch<br />
Street in New York. In 1864, B.J. Johnson in Milwaukee started the production <strong>of</strong> soap, which came<br />
to be known as Palmolive from 1898. In 1866, Colgate launched its first perfumed soaps <strong>and</strong><br />
perfumes. In 1873, Colgate launched toothpaste in a glass jug on the market <strong>and</strong> in the tube first in<br />
1896. In 1926, two soap manufacturers—Palmolive <strong>and</strong> Peet—merged to create Palmolive–Peet,<br />
which 2 years later merged with Colgate to establish the Colgate–Palmolive–Peet company (renamed<br />
as the Colgate–Palmolive Company in 1953).
Industrial Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 845<br />
TABLE 16.1<br />
The First Industrial Manufacturers <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, Flavors,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Fragrances<br />
Company Name Country Established<br />
Antoine Chiris France (Grasse) 1768<br />
Cavallier Freres France (Grasse) 1784<br />
Dodge & Olcott Inc. USA (New York) 1798<br />
Roure Bertr<strong>and</strong> Fils <strong>and</strong> Justin Dupont France (Grasse) 1820<br />
Schimmel & Co. Germany (Leipzig) 1829<br />
J. Mero-Boyveau France (Grasse) 1832<br />
Stafford Allen <strong>and</strong> Sons United Kingdom (London) 1833<br />
Robertet et Cie France (Grasse) 1850<br />
W.J. Bush United Kingdom (London) 1851<br />
Payan-Bertr<strong>and</strong> et Cie France (Grasse) 1854<br />
A. Boake Roberts United Kingdom (London) 1865<br />
Fritsche-Schimmel Co USA (New York) 1871<br />
V. Mane et Fils France (Grasse) 1871<br />
Haarman&Reimer Germany (Holzminden) 1874<br />
R.C. Treatt Co. United Kingdom (Bury) 1886<br />
N.V. Polak und Schwartz Holl<strong>and</strong> (Za<strong>and</strong>am) 1889<br />
Ogawa <strong>and</strong> Co. Japan (Osaka) 1893<br />
Firmenich <strong>and</strong> Cie Switzerl<strong>and</strong> (Geneve) 1895<br />
Givaudan S.A. Switzerl<strong>and</strong> (Geneve) 1895<br />
Maschmeijer Aromatics Holl<strong>and</strong> (Amsterdam) 1900<br />
Note: Companies continuing to operate under their original name are printed in bold.<br />
In October 1837, William Procter <strong>and</strong> James Gamble signed a formal partnership agreement to<br />
develop their production <strong>and</strong> marketing <strong>of</strong> soaps (Gamble) <strong>and</strong> c<strong>and</strong>les (Procter). “Palm oil,” “rosin,”<br />
“toilet,” <strong>and</strong> “shaving” soaps were listed in their advertisements. An “oleine” soap was described as<br />
having a violet odor. Only 22 years later, Procter & Gamble (P&G) sales reached 1 million dollars.<br />
In 1879, a fine but inexpensive “ivory” white toilet soap was <strong>of</strong>fered to the market with all purpose<br />
applications as a toilet <strong>and</strong> laundry product. In 1890, P&G was selling more than 30 different soaps.<br />
The story <strong>of</strong> a third player started in 1890 when William Hesket Lever created his concept <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Sunlight Soap, which revolutionized the idea <strong>of</strong> cleanliness <strong>and</strong> hygiene in Victorian Britain.<br />
The very beginning <strong>of</strong> twentieth century marked the next big event when the young French<br />
chemist Eugene Schueller prepared his first hair color in 1907 <strong>and</strong> established what is now L’Oreal.<br />
These were the flagships in hundreds <strong>of</strong> emerging (<strong>and</strong> disappearing by fusions, takeovers, or bankruptcy)<br />
manufacturers <strong>of</strong> perfumes, cosmetics, toiletries, detergents, household chemicals, <strong>and</strong><br />
related products, the majority <strong>of</strong> which were <strong>and</strong> are perfumed with essential oils.<br />
16.4 FLAVORS<br />
Over the same time period, another group <strong>of</strong> users <strong>of</strong> essential oils entered the markets. In 1790,<br />
the term “soda water” for carbon dioxide saturated water as a new drink appeared for the first time in the<br />
United States <strong>and</strong> in 1810, the first U.S. patent was issued for the manufacture <strong>of</strong> imitations <strong>of</strong> natural<br />
gaseous mineral waters. Only 9 years later the “soda fountain” was patented by Samuel Fahnestock. In<br />
1833, carbonated lemonade flavored with lemon juice <strong>and</strong> citric acid was on sale in Engl<strong>and</strong>. In 1835,<br />
the first bottled soda water appeared in the United States. It is, however, interesting that the first flavored<br />
sparkling drink—Ginger Ale—was created in Irel<strong>and</strong> in 1851. The milestones in flavored s<strong>of</strong>t drinks
846 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
appeared 30 years later: 1881—the first cola-flavored drink in the United States; 1885—Dr Pepper<br />
was invented by Charles Aderton in Waco, Texas; 1886—Coca-Cola by Dr John S. Pemberton in Atlanta,<br />
Georgia; <strong>and</strong> in 1898—Pepsi-Cola, created by Caleb Bradham, known from 1893 as “Brad’s Drink.”<br />
Dr Pepper was advertised as the king <strong>of</strong> beverages, free from caffeine (which was added to it later<br />
on), was flavored with black cherry artificial flavor, <strong>and</strong> was first sold in the Old Corner Drug Store<br />
owned by Wade Morrison. Its market success <strong>and</strong> position as one <strong>of</strong> the most popular U.S. s<strong>of</strong>t drinks<br />
started by a presentation during the St Louis World’s Fair, where some other important flavor-consuming<br />
products—ice cream cones, hot dog rolls, <strong>and</strong> hamburger buns—were also shown. All <strong>of</strong> them remain<br />
major users <strong>of</strong> natural flavors based on essential oils. Hundred years later after the merger with<br />
another famous lemon–lime drink 7UP in 1986, it finally became a part <strong>of</strong> Cadbury.<br />
Dr. John Pemberton was a pharmacist <strong>and</strong> he mixed up a combination <strong>of</strong> lime, cinnamon, coca<br />
leaves, <strong>and</strong> cola to make the flavor for his famous drink, first as a remedy against headache<br />
(Pemberton French Wine Coca) <strong>and</strong> then reformulated according to the prohibition law <strong>and</strong> used it<br />
to add taste to soda water from his “soda fountain.” The unique name <strong>and</strong> logo was created by his<br />
bookkeeper Frank Robinson <strong>and</strong> Coca-Cola was advertised as a delicious, exhilarating, refreshing<br />
<strong>and</strong> invigorating temperance drink. Interestingly, the first year <strong>of</strong> sales resulted in $20 loss, as the<br />
cost <strong>of</strong> the flavor syrup used for the drink was higher than the total sales <strong>of</strong> $50. In 1887, another<br />
pharmacist, Asa C<strong>and</strong>ler, bought the idea <strong>and</strong> with aggressive marketing in 10 years introduced his<br />
drink all over the United States <strong>and</strong> Canada by selling syrup to other companies licensed to manufacture<br />
<strong>and</strong> retail the drink. Until 1905, Coca-Cola was known as a tonic drink <strong>and</strong> contained the<br />
extract <strong>of</strong> cocaine <strong>and</strong> cola nuts <strong>and</strong> with the flavoring <strong>of</strong> lime <strong>and</strong> sugar.<br />
Like Pemberton, Caleb Bradham was a pharmacist <strong>and</strong> in his drugstore, he <strong>of</strong>fered soda water<br />
from his “soda fountain.” To promote sales, he flavored the soda with sugar, vanilla, pepsin, cola,<br />
<strong>and</strong> “rare oils”—obviously the essential oils <strong>of</strong> lemon <strong>and</strong> lime—<strong>and</strong> started selling it as a cure for<br />
dyspepsia, “Brad’s Drink” than Pepsi-Cola.<br />
The development <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>of</strong>t drinks industry is <strong>of</strong> great importance because it is a major consumer<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils, especially those <strong>of</strong> citrus origin. It is enough to say that nowadays, according to their<br />
web pages, only Coca-Cola-produced beverages are consumed worldwide in a quantity exceeding<br />
1 billion drinks per day. If we consider that the average content <strong>of</strong> the appropriate essential oil in the<br />
final drink is about 0.001–0.002%, <strong>and</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ard drink is ca. 0.3 l (300 g), we approach a daily<br />
consumption <strong>of</strong> essential oils by this company alone at the level <strong>of</strong> 3–6 tons per day, which gives an<br />
annual usage well over 2000 tons. Although all other br<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the food industry use substantial<br />
quantities <strong>of</strong> essential oils in ice creams, confectionary, bakery, <strong>and</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> fast foods (where<br />
spice oils are used), these together use less oils than the beverage manufacturers.<br />
There is one special range <strong>of</strong> products that can be situated between the food <strong>and</strong> cosmetic–toiletries<br />
industry sectors <strong>and</strong> it is a big consumer <strong>of</strong> essential oils, especially <strong>of</strong> all kinds <strong>of</strong> mint, eucalyptus,<br />
<strong>and</strong> some other herbal <strong>and</strong> fruity oils. These are oral care products, chewing gums, <strong>and</strong> all<br />
kinds <strong>of</strong> mouth refreshing confectioneries. As mentioned above, toothpastes appeared on the market<br />
in the late nineteenth century in the the United States. Chewing gums or the custom <strong>of</strong> chewing certain<br />
plant secretions were known to the ancient Greeks (e.g., mastic tree resin) <strong>and</strong> to ancient Mayans<br />
(e.g., sapodilla tree gum). Chewing gum, as we know it now, started in America around 1850 when<br />
John B. Curtis introduced flavored chewing gum, which was first patented in 1859 by William<br />
Semple. In 1892, William Wrigley used chewing gum as a free gift with sales <strong>of</strong> baking powder in<br />
his business in Chicago <strong>and</strong> very soon he realized that chewing gum has real potential. In 1893, Juicy<br />
Fruit gum came into market <strong>and</strong> was followed in the same year by Wrigley’s Spearmint; today, both<br />
products are known <strong>and</strong> consumed worldwide <strong>and</strong> their names are global trademarks.<br />
16.5 PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION<br />
This brief <strong>and</strong> certainly incomplete look into the history <strong>of</strong> industrial usage <strong>of</strong> essential oils as<br />
flavor <strong>and</strong> fragrance ingredients shows that the real industrial scale <strong>of</strong> flavor <strong>and</strong> fragrance industry
Industrial Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 847<br />
developed in the second half <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century together with transformation <strong>of</strong> “manufacture”<br />
into “industry.”<br />
There are no reliable data on the scale <strong>of</strong> consumption <strong>of</strong> essential oils in specific products. On<br />
the basis <strong>of</strong> different sources, it can be estimated that the world market for the flavors <strong>and</strong> fragrances<br />
has a value <strong>of</strong> 10–12 billion euro, being equally shared by each group <strong>of</strong> products. It is very difficult<br />
to estimate the usage <strong>of</strong> essential oils in each <strong>of</strong> the groups. More oils are used in flavors than<br />
in fragrances which today are mainly based on aroma chemicals, especially in large volume<br />
compounds used in detergents <strong>and</strong> household products. Table 16.2 presents estimated data on world<br />
consumption <strong>of</strong> major essential oils (each used over 500 tons per annum).<br />
TABLE 16.2<br />
Estimated World Consumption <strong>of</strong> the Major <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Oil Name<br />
Consumption<br />
(tons)<br />
Approximate<br />
Value (€ million) a<br />
Major <strong>Applications</strong> b<br />
Orange 50,000 275 S<strong>of</strong>t drinks, sweets, fragrances<br />
Cornmint<br />
(Mentha arvensis) c 25,000 265 Oral care, chewing gum, confectionery,<br />
fragrances, menthol crystals<br />
Peppermint 4500 120 Oral care, chewing gum, confectionery,<br />
liquors, tobacco, fragrances<br />
Eucalyptus<br />
(Eucalyptus globulus)<br />
4000 22 Oral care, chewing gum, confectionery,<br />
pharmaceuticals, fragrances<br />
Lemon 3500 21 S<strong>of</strong>t drinks, sweets, diary, fragrances,<br />
household chemicals<br />
Citronella 3000 33 Perfumery, toiletries, household chemicals<br />
Eucalyptus<br />
(Eucalyptus citriodora)<br />
2100 10 Confectionery, oral care, chewing gum,<br />
pharmaceuticals, fragrances<br />
Clove leaf 2000 24 Condiments, sweets, pharmaceuticals,<br />
tobacco, toiletries, household chemicals<br />
Spearmint<br />
2000 46 Oral care, chewing gum, confectionery<br />
(Mentha spicata)<br />
Cedarwood (Virginia) 1500 22 Perfumery, toiletries, household chemicals<br />
Lime 1500 66 S<strong>of</strong>t drinks, sweets, diary, fragrances<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>in 1000 15 Perfumery, cosmetics, toiletries<br />
Litsea cubeba 1000 20 Citral for s<strong>of</strong>t drinks, fragrances<br />
Cedarwood (China) 800 11 Perfumery, toiletries, household chemicals<br />
Camphor 700 3 Pharmaceuticals<br />
Cori<strong>and</strong>er 700 40 Condiments, pickles, processed food,<br />
fragrances<br />
Grapefruit 700 9 S<strong>of</strong>t drinks, fragrances<br />
Star anise 700 7 Liquors, sweets, bakery, household<br />
chemicals<br />
Patchouli 600 69 Perfumery, cosmetics, toiletries<br />
Basil 500 12 Condiments, processed food, perfumery,<br />
toiletries<br />
M<strong>and</strong>arine 500 30 S<strong>of</strong>t drinks, sweets, liquors,<br />
perfumery, toiletries<br />
a<br />
Based on average prices <strong>of</strong>fered in 2007.<br />
b<br />
Almost all <strong>of</strong> the major oils are used in alternative medicine.<br />
c<br />
Main source <strong>of</strong> natural menthol.
848 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
The following oils are used in quantities between 100 <strong>and</strong> 500 tons per annum: bergamot, cassia,<br />
cinnamon leaf, clary sage, dill, geranium, lemon petitgrain, lemongrass, petitgrain, pine, rosemary,<br />
tea tree, <strong>and</strong> vetivert. It must be emphasized that most <strong>of</strong> the figures given above on the production<br />
volume are probably underestimates because no reliable data are available on the domestic consumption<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils in major producing countries, such as China, India, <strong>and</strong> Indonesia.<br />
Therefore quantities presented in various sources are sometimes very different. For example, consumption<br />
<strong>of</strong> Mentha arvensis is given as 5000 <strong>and</strong> 25,000 tons per annum. The lower one probably<br />
relates to the direct usage <strong>of</strong> the oil, the higher includes the oil used for the production <strong>of</strong> menthol<br />
crystals. In Table 16.2, the highest available figures are presented. Considering the above <strong>and</strong> general<br />
figures for flavors <strong>and</strong> fragrances, it can be estimated that the total value <strong>of</strong> essential oils used<br />
worldwide is somewhere between 2 <strong>and</strong> 3 billion euro. Price fluctuations (e.g., the patchouli oil price<br />
jump in mid-2007) <strong>and</strong> many other unpredictable changes cause any estimation <strong>of</strong> essential oils<br />
consumption value to be very risky <strong>and</strong> disputable. The figures given in the table are based on average<br />
trade <strong>of</strong>fers. Table 16.2 does not include turpentine, which is sometimes added into essential oils<br />
data. Being used mainly as a chemical solvent or a raw material in the aroma chemicals industry, it<br />
has no practical application as an essential oil, except in some household chemicals.<br />
As noted earlier, the largest world consumer <strong>of</strong> essential oils is the flavor industry, especially for s<strong>of</strong>t<br />
drinks. However, this is limited to a few essential oils, mainly citrus (orange, lemon, grapefruit, m<strong>and</strong>arin,<br />
lime), ginger, cinnamon, clove, <strong>and</strong> peppermint. Similar oils are used in confectionery, bakery,<br />
desserts, <strong>and</strong> dairy products, although the range <strong>of</strong> oils may be wider <strong>and</strong> include some fruity products<br />
<strong>and</strong> spices. The spicy oils are widely used in numerous salted chips, which are commonly consumed<br />
along with beverages <strong>and</strong> long drinks. Also, the alcoholic beverage industry is a substantial user <strong>of</strong><br />
essential oils; for example, anis in numerous specialties <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean region; herbal oils in<br />
liqueurs; ginger in ginger beer; peppermint in mint liquor; <strong>and</strong> in many other flavored alcohols.<br />
Next in importance to beverages in the food sector are the sweet, dairy, confectionery, dessert<br />
(fresh <strong>and</strong> powdered), sweet bakery, <strong>and</strong> cream manufacturing sector, for which the main oils used<br />
are citrus, cinnamon, clove, ginger, <strong>and</strong> anis. Many other oils are used in an enormous range <strong>of</strong> very<br />
different products in this category.<br />
The fast food <strong>and</strong> processed food industries are also substantial users <strong>of</strong> essential oils, although<br />
the main dem<strong>and</strong> is for spicy <strong>and</strong> herbal flavors. Important oils here are cori<strong>and</strong>er (especially popular<br />
in the United States), pepper, pimento, laurel, cardamom, ginger, basil, oregano, dill, <strong>and</strong> fennel,<br />
which are added to the spices with the aim <strong>of</strong> strengthening <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ardizing the flavor.<br />
The major users <strong>of</strong> essential oils are the big compounders—companies that emerged from the<br />
historical manufacturers <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> fragrances <strong>and</strong> flavors <strong>and</strong> new ones established by<br />
various deals between old players in the market or, like International Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances (IFF),<br />
were created by talented managers who left their parent companies <strong>and</strong> started on their own. Today’s<br />
big 10 are listed in Table 16.3.<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> the 20 companies listed in Table 16.1, seven were located in France but by 2007, out <strong>of</strong><br />
10 largest, only two are from France. Also, only four <strong>of</strong> today’s big 10 are over a century old with<br />
two leaders—Givaudan <strong>and</strong> Firmenich—from Switzerl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Mane <strong>and</strong> Robertet from France.<br />
The flavor <strong>and</strong> fragrance industry is the one where the majority <strong>of</strong> oils are introduced into appropriate<br />
flavor <strong>and</strong> fragrance compositions. Created by flavorists <strong>and</strong> perfumers, an elite <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />
in the industry, the compositions, complicated mixtures <strong>of</strong> natural <strong>and</strong> nature identical ingredients<br />
for flavoring, <strong>and</strong> natural <strong>and</strong> synthetic components for fragrances, are <strong>of</strong>fered to end users. The<br />
latter are the manufacturers <strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> very different products from luxurious “haute couture”<br />
perfumes, <strong>and</strong> top-class-flavored liquors <strong>and</strong> chocolate pralines through cosmetics, household<br />
chemicals, sauces, condiments, cleaning products, air fresheners, <strong>and</strong> aroma marketing.<br />
It is important to emphasize that a very wide range <strong>of</strong> essential oils are used in alternative or<br />
“natural” medicine with aromatherapy—treatment <strong>of</strong> many ailments with the use <strong>of</strong> essential oils<br />
as bioactive ingredients—being the leading outlet for the oils <strong>and</strong> products in which they are applied<br />
as major active components. The ideas <strong>of</strong> aromatherapy from a niche area dominated by lovers <strong>of</strong>
Industrial Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 849<br />
TABLE 16.3<br />
Leading Producers <strong>of</strong> Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances<br />
Position Company Name (Headquarters) Sales in Million (€) a<br />
1 Givaudan S.A. (Vernier, Switzerl<strong>and</strong>) 2550<br />
2 Firmenich S.A. (Geneve, Switzerl<strong>and</strong>) 1620<br />
3 International Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances (New York, USA) 1500<br />
4 Symrise AG (Holzminden, Germany) 1160<br />
5 Takasago International Corporation (Tokyo, Japan) 680<br />
6 Sensient Technologies Flavors&Fragrances (Milwaukee, USA) 400<br />
7 T. Hasegawa Co. Ltd (Tokyo, Japan) 280<br />
8 Mane S.A. (Le Bar-sur-Loup, France) 260<br />
9 Frutarom Industries Ltd (Haifa, Israel) 220<br />
10 Robertet S.A. (Grasse, France) 210<br />
a<br />
Estimated data based on web pages <strong>of</strong> the companies, various reports, <strong>and</strong> journals.<br />
nature <strong>and</strong> some kind <strong>of</strong> magic, although based on very old <strong>and</strong> clinically proved experience, came<br />
into mass production appearing as an advertising “hit” in many products including global ranges.<br />
Examples include Colgate–Palmolive liquid soaps, a variety <strong>of</strong> shampoos, body lotions, creams,<br />
<strong>and</strong> so on by many other producers, <strong>and</strong> fabric s<strong>of</strong>teners emphasizing the benefits to users’ mood<br />
<strong>and</strong> condition from the odors <strong>of</strong> essential oils (<strong>and</strong> other fragrant ingredients) remaining on fabrics.<br />
Aromatherapy <strong>and</strong> “natural” products, where essential oils are emphasized as “the natural” ingredients,<br />
are a very fast developing segment <strong>of</strong> the industry <strong>and</strong> this is a return to what was a common<br />
practice in ancient <strong>and</strong> medieval times.<br />
16.6 CHANGING TRENDS<br />
Until the second half <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century, formulas <strong>of</strong> perfumes <strong>and</strong> flavors (although much<br />
less data are available on flavoring products in history) were based on essential oils <strong>and</strong> some other<br />
naturals (musk, civet, amber, resins, pomades, tinctures, extracts, etc.). Now, some 150 years later,<br />
old formulations are being taken out <strong>of</strong> historical books <strong>and</strong> are advertised as the “back to nature”<br />
trend. Perfumery h<strong>and</strong>books published until the early twentieth century listed essential oils, <strong>and</strong><br />
none or only one or two aroma chemicals (or isolates from essential oils). A very good illustration<br />
<strong>of</strong> the changes that affected the formulation <strong>of</strong> perfumes in the twentieth century is a comparison <strong>of</strong><br />
rose fragrance as recorded in perfumery h<strong>and</strong>books. Dr Heinrich Hirzel in his Die Toiletten Chemie<br />
(1892, p. 384) gave the following formula for high-quality white rose perfume:<br />
400 g <strong>of</strong> rose extract<br />
200 g <strong>of</strong> violet extract<br />
150 g <strong>of</strong> acacia extract<br />
100 g <strong>of</strong> jasmine extract<br />
120 g <strong>of</strong> iris infusion<br />
25 g <strong>of</strong> musk tincture<br />
5 g <strong>of</strong> rose oil<br />
10 drops <strong>of</strong> patchouli oil.<br />
Felix Cola’s milestone work Le Livre de Parfumeur (1931, p. 192) recorded a white rose formula<br />
containing only 1% <strong>of</strong> rose oil, 2% <strong>of</strong> rose absolute, 7.5% other oils, <strong>and</strong> aroma chemicals.
850 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Rose Blanche<br />
Rose oil<br />
Rose absolute<br />
Patchouli oil<br />
Bergamot oil<br />
Linalool<br />
Benzyl acetate<br />
Phenylethyl acetate<br />
Citronellol<br />
Geraniol<br />
Phenylethyl alcohol<br />
10 g<br />
20 g<br />
25 g<br />
50 g<br />
60 g<br />
7 g<br />
75 g<br />
185 g<br />
200 g<br />
300 g<br />
In the mid-twentieth century, perfumers were educated to consider chemicals as the most convenient,<br />
stable, <strong>and</strong> useful ingredients for fragrance compositions. Several rose fragrance formulas<br />
with less than 2% rose oil or absolute can be found in F.V. Wells <strong>and</strong> M. Billot’s Perfumery<br />
<strong>Technology</strong>, (1975), <strong>and</strong> rose fragrance without any natural rose product is nothing curious in a<br />
contemporary perfumers’ notebook. However, looking through descriptions <strong>of</strong> new fragrances<br />
launched in the last few years, one can observe a very strong tendency to emphasize the presence<br />
<strong>of</strong> natural ingredients—oils, resinoids, <strong>and</strong> absolutes—in the fragrant mixture. The “back to<br />
nature” trend creates another area for essential oils usage in many products.<br />
A very fast growing group <strong>of</strong> cosmetics <strong>and</strong> related products today are the so-called organic products.<br />
These are based on plant ingredients obtained from wild harvesting or from “organic cultivation”<br />
<strong>and</strong> which are free <strong>of</strong> pesticides, herbicides, synthetic fertilizers, <strong>and</strong> other chemicals widely<br />
used in agriculture. According to different sources, sales <strong>of</strong> “organic” products in 2007 will reach<br />
4–5 billion U.S. dollars. The same “organic raw materials” are becoming more <strong>and</strong> more popular in<br />
the food industry, which in consequence will increase the consumption <strong>of</strong> “organic flavors” based on<br />
“organic essential oils.” “Organic” certificates, available in many countries (in principle for agricultural<br />
products, although they are institutions that also certify cosmetics <strong>and</strong> related products), are<br />
product passports to a higher price level <strong>and</strong> selective shops or departments in supermarkets. The<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> that segment <strong>of</strong> essential oils consumption can be illustrated by comparison <strong>of</strong> the average<br />
prices for st<strong>and</strong>ard essential oils as listed in Table 16.4 <strong>and</strong> the same oils claimed as “organic.”<br />
The consumption <strong>of</strong> essential oils in perfumed products varies according to the product (Table 16.5):<br />
from a very high level in perfumes (due to the high concentration <strong>of</strong> fragrance compounds in perfumes<br />
<strong>and</strong> the high content <strong>of</strong> natural ingredients in perfume fragrances) <strong>and</strong> in a wide range <strong>of</strong><br />
“natural” cosmetics <strong>and</strong> toiletries to relatively low levels in detergents <strong>and</strong> household chemicals, in<br />
which fragrances are based on readily available low-priced aroma chemicals. However, it must be<br />
emphasized that although the concentration <strong>of</strong> essential oils in detergents <strong>and</strong> related products is low,<br />
the large volume sales <strong>of</strong> these consumer products result in substantial consumption <strong>of</strong> the oils.<br />
Average values given for fragrance dosage in products <strong>and</strong> for the content <strong>of</strong> oils in fragrances are<br />
based on literature data <strong>and</strong> private communications from the manufacturers. It should be noted that<br />
in many cases the actual figures for individual products can be significantly different. “Eau Savage”<br />
from Dior is a very good example: analytical data indicate a content <strong>of</strong> essential oils (mainly bergamot)<br />
<strong>of</strong> over 70%. Toothpastes are exceptional in that the content <strong>of</strong> essential oils in the flavor is in<br />
some cases nearly 100% (mainly peppermint, spearmint cooled with natural menthol).<br />
While the average dosage <strong>of</strong> fragrances in the final product can be very high, flavors in food<br />
products are used in very low dosages, well below 1%. The high consumption <strong>of</strong> essential oils by<br />
this sector results from the large volume <strong>of</strong> sales <strong>of</strong> flavored foods. Average dosages <strong>of</strong> flavors <strong>and</strong><br />
the content <strong>of</strong> essential oils in the flavors are given in Table 16.6.<br />
As in the case <strong>of</strong> fragrances, the average figures given in Table 16.6 vary in practice in<br />
individual cases, both in the flavor content in the product <strong>and</strong> much more in the essential oils
Industrial Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 851<br />
TABLE 16.4<br />
Prices <strong>of</strong> Selected St<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>and</strong> “Organic” <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Oil Name St<strong>and</strong>ard Quality (€/kg) a Organic Quality (€/kg) a<br />
Orange 5.50 35<br />
Cornmint (M. arvensis) 10.50 50<br />
Peppermint 27.00 100<br />
Eucalyptus (E. globulus) 5.50 26<br />
Lemon 6.00 30<br />
Citronella 11.00 23<br />
Eucalyptus (E. citriodora) 5.00 34<br />
Clove leaf 12.00 60<br />
Spearmint (M. spicata) 23.00 40<br />
Cedarwood (Virginia) 15.00 58<br />
Lime 44.00 92<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>in 15.00 36<br />
Litsea cubeba 20.00 44<br />
Cedarwood (China) 14.00 53<br />
Camphor 4.50 24<br />
Cori<strong>and</strong>er 57.00 143<br />
Grapefruit 13.00 170<br />
Patchouli 115.00 250<br />
a<br />
Average prices based on commercial <strong>of</strong>fers in 2007.<br />
TABLE 16.5<br />
Average Dosage <strong>of</strong> Fragrances in Consumer Products <strong>and</strong> Content <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
in Fragrance Compounds<br />
Position<br />
Product<br />
Average Dosage <strong>of</strong><br />
Fragrance Compound<br />
in Product (%)<br />
Average Content<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in<br />
Fragrance (%)<br />
1 Perfumes 10.0–25.0 5–30 a<br />
2 Toilet waters 3.0–8.0 5–50 a<br />
3 Skin care cosmetics 0.1–0.6 0 –10<br />
4 Deodorants (inclusive deoparfum) 0.5–5.0 0 –10<br />
5 Shampoos 0.3–2.0 0 –5<br />
6 Body cleansing products (liquid soaps) 0.5–3.0 0 –5<br />
7 Bath preparations 0.5–6.0 0 –10<br />
8 Soaps 0.5–3.0 0 –5<br />
9 Toothpastes 0.5–2.5 10 –50 b<br />
10 Air fresheners 0.5–30.0 0 –20<br />
11 Washing powders <strong>and</strong> liquids 0.1–0.5 0 –5<br />
12 Fabric s<strong>of</strong>teners 0.1–0.5 0 –10<br />
13 Home care chemicals 0.5–5.0 0 –5<br />
14 Technical products 0.1–0.5 0 –5<br />
15 Aromatherapy <strong>and</strong> organic products 0.1–0.5 100<br />
a<br />
b<br />
Traditional perfumery products contained more natural oils than modern ones.<br />
Mainly mint oils.
852 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 16.6<br />
Average Content <strong>of</strong> Flavors in Food Products <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> in Flavors<br />
Position<br />
Food Products<br />
Flavor Dosage in<br />
Food Product (%)<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> Content<br />
in Flavor (%)<br />
1 Alcoholic beverages 0.05–0.15 3–100<br />
2 S<strong>of</strong>t drinks 0.10–0.15 2–5<br />
3 Sweets (confectionery, chocolate, etc.) 0.15–0.25 1–100<br />
4 Bakery (cakes, biscuits, etc.) 0.10–0.25 1–50<br />
5 Ice creams 0.10–0.30 2–100<br />
6 Diary products, desserts 0.05–0.25 1–50<br />
7 Meat <strong>and</strong> fish products (also canned) 0.10–0.25 10–20<br />
8 Sauces, ketchup, condiments 0.10–0.50 2–10<br />
9 Food concentrates 0.10–0.50 1–25<br />
10 Snacks 0.10–0.15 2–20<br />
percentage in the flavor. Again “natural” or “organic” products contain only essential oils, since it<br />
is unacceptable to include any synthetic aroma chemicals or so-called nature identical food flavors.<br />
It should be noted that a substantial number <strong>of</strong> flavorings are oleoresins: products that are a combination<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> other plant-derived ingredients, which are especially common in hot<br />
spices (pepper, chili, pimento, etc.) containing organoleptically important pungent components<br />
that do not distill in steam. This group <strong>of</strong> oleoresin products must be included in the total consumption<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils.<br />
For many years after World War II, aroma chemicals were considered the future for fragrance<br />
chemistry <strong>and</strong> there was strong, if unsuccessful, pressure by the manufacturers to get approval for<br />
the wide introduction <strong>of</strong> synthetics (especially those regarded as “nature identical”) in food flavors.<br />
The very fast development <strong>of</strong> production <strong>and</strong> usage <strong>of</strong> aroma chemicals caused increasing concern<br />
over safety issues for the human health <strong>and</strong> for the environment. One by one certain products were<br />
found harmful either for human health (e.g., nitro musks) or for nature. This resulted in wide research<br />
on the safety <strong>of</strong> the chemicals <strong>and</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> new safe synthetics. Concurrently, the attention<br />
<strong>of</strong> perfumers <strong>and</strong> producers turned in the direction <strong>of</strong> essential oils, which as derived from<br />
natural sources <strong>and</strong> known <strong>and</strong> used for centuries were generally considered safe. According to<br />
recent research, however, this belief is not entirely true <strong>and</strong> some, fortunately very few, oils <strong>and</strong><br />
other fragrance products obtained from plants have been found dangerous, <strong>and</strong> their use has been<br />
banned or restricted. However, these are exceptional cases <strong>and</strong> the majority <strong>of</strong> essential oils are<br />
found safe both for use on the human body as cosmetics <strong>and</strong> related products as well as for consumption<br />
as food ingredients.<br />
It is important to appreciate that the market for “natural,” “organic,” <strong>and</strong> “ecological” products<br />
both in body care <strong>and</strong> food industries has changed from a niche area to a boom in recent years with<br />
the growth exceeding 30% per annum. The estimated value <strong>of</strong> sales for “organic” cosmetics <strong>and</strong><br />
toiletries is 600–800 million euro in Europe, the United States, <strong>and</strong> Japan <strong>and</strong> will grow steadily<br />
together with organic foods. This creates a very sound future for the essential oils industry, which<br />
as such or as isolates derived from the oils will be widely used for fragrance compounds in cosmetic<br />
<strong>and</strong> related products as well as for flavors.<br />
Furthermore, the modernization <strong>of</strong> agricultural techniques <strong>and</strong> the growth <strong>of</strong> plantation areas<br />
result in better economical factors for the production <strong>of</strong> essential oil-bearing plants, creating workplaces<br />
in developing countries <strong>of</strong> Southeast Asia, Africa, <strong>and</strong> South America as well as further<br />
development <strong>of</strong> modern farms in the United States <strong>and</strong> Europe (Mediterranean area, Balkans).<br />
Despite some regulatory restrictions (EU, REACH, FDA, etc.), essential oils are <strong>and</strong> will have an
Industrial Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 853<br />
important <strong>and</strong> growing share in the fragrance <strong>and</strong> flavor industry. The same will be true for the<br />
usage <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> other products <strong>of</strong> medicinal plants in pharmaceutical products. It is well<br />
known that the big pharmaceutical companies invest substantial resources in studies <strong>of</strong> folk <strong>and</strong><br />
traditional medicine as well as in research on biologically active constituents <strong>of</strong> plant origin. Both<br />
<strong>of</strong> these areas cover applications <strong>of</strong> essential oils. The same is observed in cosmetic <strong>and</strong> toiletries<br />
using essential oils as active healing ingredients.<br />
16.7 CONCLUSIONS<br />
It can be concluded that the industrial use <strong>of</strong> essential oils is a very promising area <strong>and</strong> that regular<br />
growth shall be observed in future. Much research work will be undertaken both on the safety <strong>of</strong><br />
existing products <strong>and</strong> on development <strong>of</strong> new oil-bearing plants that are used locally in different<br />
regions <strong>of</strong> the world both as healing agents <strong>and</strong> as food flavorings. Both directions are equally<br />
important. Global exchange <strong>of</strong> tastes <strong>and</strong> customs shall not lead to unification by Coca-Cola or<br />
McDonalds. With all the positive aspects <strong>of</strong> these products, there are many local specialties that can<br />
become world property, like basil-oregano-flavored pizza, curry dishes, spicy kebab, or the universal<br />
<strong>and</strong> always fashionable Eau de Cologne. With the growth <strong>of</strong> the usage <strong>of</strong> the commonly known<br />
essential oils, new ones coming from exotic flowers <strong>of</strong> the Amazon jungle or from Indian Ayurveda<br />
books can add new benefits to the flavor <strong>and</strong> fragrance industry.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />
The author is most grateful to K.D. Protzen <strong>of</strong> Paul Kaders GmbH <strong>and</strong> Dr C. Green for their help<br />
<strong>and</strong> assistance in preparation <strong>of</strong> this chapter.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Cola, F., 1931. Le Livre du Parfumeur. Paris: Casterman.<br />
Hirzel, H., 1892. Die Toiletten Chemie. Leipzig, Germany: J.J. Weber Verlag.<br />
FURTHER READING<br />
Dorl<strong>and</strong>, W.F. <strong>and</strong> J.A. Rogers Jr., 1977. The Fragrance <strong>and</strong> Flavor Industry. New Jersey: V.E. Dorl<strong>and</strong>.<br />
Lawrence, B.M., 2000, <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 1995–2000. Wheaton, IL: Allured Publishing.<br />
Lawrence, B.M., 2004, <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 2001–2004. Wheaton, IL: Allured Publishing.<br />
Lawrence, B.M., 2007, <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 2005–2007. Wheaton, IL: Allured Publishing.<br />
Wells, F.V. <strong>and</strong> M. Billot, 1981. Perfumery <strong>Technology</strong>. London: E. Horwood Ltd.<br />
WEB SITES<br />
American Beverage Association: http://www.ameribev.org<br />
The Coca-Cola Company: http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/heritage/ourheritage.html<br />
Colgate-Palmolive: http://www.colgate.com/app/Colgate/US/Corp/History/1806.cvsp<br />
Pepsi Cola History: http://www.solarnavigator.net/sponsorship/pepsi_cola.htm<br />
Procter & Gamble: http://www.pg.com/company/who_we_are/ourhistory.shtml<br />
Unilever: http://www.unilever.com/aboutus
17<br />
Encapsulation <strong>and</strong> Other<br />
Programmed Release<br />
Techniques for <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> Volatile Terpenes<br />
Jan Karlsen<br />
CONTENTS<br />
17.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 855<br />
17.2 Controlled Release <strong>of</strong> Volatiles ....................................................................................... 856<br />
17.3 Use <strong>of</strong> Hydrophilic Polymers .......................................................................................... 858<br />
17.4 Alginate ........................................................................................................................... 859<br />
17.5 Stabilization <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Constituents ..................................................................... 859<br />
17.6 Controlled Release <strong>of</strong> Volatiles from Nonvolatile Precursors ........................................ 859<br />
17.7 Cyclodextrin Complexation <strong>of</strong> Volatiles ......................................................................... 860<br />
17.8 Concluding Remarks ....................................................................................................... 860<br />
References .................................................................................................................................. 860<br />
17.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
In order to widen the applications <strong>of</strong> volatiles (essential oils), it is necessary to lower the volatility<br />
<strong>of</strong> the compounds to obtain a longer shelf life <strong>of</strong> products made with these compounds. By lowering<br />
the volatility, one can also imagine a possibility to better test the biological effects <strong>of</strong> these compounds.<br />
The encapsulation processes are means by which a liquid essential oil is enclosed in a carrier<br />
matrix to provide a dry, free-flowing powder. However, for the prolonged effect <strong>of</strong> volatile<br />
compounds many other techniques are used, where methods are copied from other fields <strong>of</strong> research<br />
when one wants to control the release <strong>of</strong> active ingredients.<br />
To lower the volatility, one needs to encapsulate the volatiles into a polymer matrix, utilize complex<br />
formation, use the covalent bonding to a matrix—to mention a few techniques. We therefore<br />
need to formulate the volatiles <strong>and</strong> take many <strong>of</strong> these techniques from areas where controlled<br />
release formulations have already been in use for many years. The area with the maximum number<br />
<strong>of</strong> applications <strong>of</strong> controlled release formulations is the field <strong>of</strong> drug delivery. In this area <strong>of</strong> research,<br />
there exists a large number <strong>of</strong> publications as well as a large number <strong>of</strong> patents where one can find<br />
inspiration for the formulation <strong>of</strong> programmed release <strong>of</strong> volatiles (Deasy, 1984).<br />
So far in the area <strong>of</strong> volatile terpenes/essential oils, we have seen a large number <strong>of</strong> investigations<br />
that focused on plant selection, volatiles isolation techniques, separation <strong>of</strong> the volatiles isolated,<br />
identification <strong>of</strong> isolated compounds, <strong>and</strong> the biochemical formation <strong>of</strong> terpenes. The formulation<br />
855
856 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> volatiles into products has been seen as an area <strong>of</strong> industrial research. This has naturally led to a<br />
large number <strong>of</strong> patents but very few scientific publications on the formulation <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong><br />
lower terpenes.<br />
The idea <strong>of</strong> this chapter is to give an introduction to the area <strong>of</strong> making a controlled release<br />
product <strong>of</strong> volatiles <strong>and</strong>, in particular, <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> their constituents.<br />
17.2 CONTROLLED RELEASE OF VOLATILES<br />
The main interest <strong>of</strong> volatiles encapsulation is the possibility to extend the biological effect <strong>of</strong> the<br />
compounds. For essential oils, we want to prolong the activity by lowering the evaporation <strong>of</strong><br />
the volatile compounds. During the last 10 years, there are not many publications on this topic in the<br />
scientific literature but there are quite a number <strong>of</strong> patents that describe the various ways <strong>of</strong> prolonging<br />
the effect <strong>of</strong> volatiles (Porzio, 2008; Sair <strong>and</strong> Sair, 1980a; Sair, 1980b; Zasypkin <strong>and</strong> Porzio,<br />
2004; Fulger <strong>and</strong> Popplewell, 1997, 1998; McIver, 2005). One reason for this fact is that the prolonging<br />
<strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> volatile compounds is regarded as so close to practical applications <strong>and</strong> therefore<br />
the area <strong>of</strong> industrial research where the results will be bonded in patent applications. However,<br />
there are signs that this idea is changing. In order to lower the volatility, thus prolonging the effect<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> terpenes, we have to look into another area <strong>of</strong> scientific research. In the field <strong>of</strong><br />
drug delivery, many techniques have been studied for the controlled delivery <strong>of</strong> active molecules.<br />
The reasons for controlled release (encapsulation <strong>of</strong> volatiles) may be the following:<br />
Changing the impact <strong>of</strong> fragrance <strong>and</strong> flavors<br />
Adding fragrance to textiles<br />
Stabilizing specific compounds<br />
Tailoring the fragrance to the intended use <strong>of</strong> a product<br />
Lowering the volatility <strong>and</strong> thereby prolonging the shelf life <strong>of</strong> a fragrance product.<br />
The slow or controlled release <strong>of</strong> volatiles is achieved by:<br />
Encapsulation<br />
Solution/dispersion in a polymer matrix<br />
Complex formation<br />
Covalent bonding to another molecule or matrix.<br />
For essential oils <strong>and</strong> lower terpenes, the following techniques can be utilized depending on the<br />
volatiles <strong>and</strong> the intended use <strong>of</strong> the final product:<br />
Microcapsule production<br />
Microparticle production<br />
Melt extrusion<br />
Melt injection<br />
Complex formation<br />
Liposomes<br />
Micelles<br />
Covalent bonding to a matrix<br />
Combination <strong>of</strong> nanocapsules into larger microcapsules.<br />
Since the making <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the above-mentioned type <strong>of</strong> products <strong>and</strong> techniques will influence<br />
the activity toward the human biological membranes in one way or the other. Therefore, the relevant<br />
sizes <strong>of</strong> biological units are listed in Table 17.1 <strong>and</strong> the average sizes <strong>of</strong> units produced in consumer<br />
products, where volatile compounds are involved are listed in Table 17.2.
Encapsulation <strong>and</strong> Other Programmed Release Techniques 857<br />
TABLE 17.1<br />
Size Diameters <strong>of</strong> Biological Entities<br />
Human blood cells<br />
Bacteria<br />
Human cell nucleus<br />
Nanoparticles that can cross biomembranes<br />
Virus<br />
Hemoglobin molecule<br />
Nanoparticle that can cross blood–brain barrier<br />
DNA helix<br />
Water molecule<br />
7000–8000 nm<br />
800–2000 nm<br />
1000 nm<br />
60 nm<br />
17–300 nm<br />
3.3 nm<br />
4 nm<br />
3 nm<br />
0.3 nm<br />
TABLE 17.2<br />
Average Size <strong>of</strong> Formulation Units in nm (Sizes<br />
below 150 nm may be Invisible to the Naked Eye)<br />
Solutions 0.1<br />
Micellar solutions 0.5<br />
Macromolecular solutions 0.5<br />
Microemulsions 5–20<br />
Liposomes SUV 20–150<br />
Nanospheres 100–500<br />
Nanocapsules 100–500<br />
Liposomes LUV 200–500<br />
Liposomes MLV 200–1000<br />
Microcapsules 5000–30,000<br />
Simple emulsions 500–5000<br />
Multiple emulsions 10,000–100,000<br />
Abbreviations: SUV is small unilamellar vesicles, LUV is large unilamellar<br />
vesicles, <strong>and</strong> MUV is multilamellar vesicles.<br />
Since the introduction <strong>of</strong> the encapsulation <strong>of</strong> volatiles (essential oils/lower terpenes), the number<br />
<strong>of</strong> applications has multiplied. Encapsulation <strong>of</strong> volatiles gives us a more predictable <strong>and</strong> longlasting<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> the products. The areas <strong>of</strong> applications are large <strong>and</strong> the industry <strong>of</strong> essential oils<br />
<strong>and</strong> terpenes foresee many prospects for microencapsulated products.<br />
Application markets <strong>of</strong> encapsulated essential oils <strong>and</strong> terpenes are:<br />
Medicine<br />
Food, household items, <strong>and</strong> personal care<br />
Biotechnology<br />
Pharmaceuticals<br />
Electronics<br />
Photography<br />
Chemical industry<br />
Textile industry<br />
Cosmetics.
858 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
It is therefore easy to underst<strong>and</strong> that the encapsulation procedures will open up a much larger<br />
market for essential oil/terpene products. Experience from all the areas mentioned above can be<br />
applied to the study <strong>of</strong> volatile compounds in products.<br />
In the area <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> lower terpenes, simple encapsulation procedures from the area <strong>of</strong><br />
drug delivery are applied. The essential oils or single active constituents are mixed with a hydrophilic<br />
polymer <strong>and</strong> spray-dried using a commercial spray-drier. Depending on whether we have an<br />
emulsion or a solution <strong>of</strong> the volatile fraction in the polymer, we obtain monolithic particles or a<br />
normal microcapsule.<br />
The most usual polymers used for encapsulation are:<br />
Oligosaccharides from a-amylase<br />
Modified starches from maize, cassava, rice, <strong>and</strong> potato<br />
Acacia gum<br />
Gum arabic<br />
Alginate<br />
Chitosan.<br />
Many different emulsifiers are used to solubilize the essential oils totally or partly, prior to the<br />
encapsulation procedure. This can result in a monolithic particle or a usual capsule, where the<br />
essential oil is surrounded by a hydrophilic coating. When the mixture <strong>of</strong> an essential oil <strong>and</strong> a<br />
hydrophilic polymer is achieved, the application <strong>of</strong> a spray-drying procedure <strong>of</strong> the resulting mixture<br />
will result in the formation <strong>of</strong> microcapsules. The techniques for achieving an encapsulated<br />
product in high efficiency will depend on many technical parameters <strong>and</strong> can be found in the patent<br />
literature. Normally a mixture <strong>of</strong> essential oil:hydrophilic polymer (4:1) can be used, but this will<br />
also depend on the type <strong>of</strong> equipment used. The reader is advised to refer to the parameters given<br />
for the polymer used in the experiment. To achieve the encapsulated product, a mixture <strong>of</strong> low pressure<br />
<strong>and</strong> temperature is used in the spray-drying equipment <strong>and</strong> a loss <strong>of</strong> essential oil/volatiles is<br />
inevitable. However, a recovery <strong>of</strong> more than 70% can be achieved by carefully monitoring the<br />
production conditions.<br />
17.3 USE OF HYDROPHILIC POLYMERS<br />
In product development, one tends to use cheap derivatives <strong>of</strong> starches or other low-grade quality<br />
polymers. Early studies with protein-based polymers such as gelatine, gelatine derivatives,<br />
soy proteins, <strong>and</strong> milk-derived proteins gave reasonable technical quality <strong>of</strong> the products.<br />
However, even if these materials show stable emulsification properties with essential oils, they<br />
have some unwanted side effects in products. We have seen that a more careful control <strong>of</strong> the<br />
polymer used can result in real high-tech products, where the predictability <strong>of</strong> the release <strong>of</strong> the<br />
volatiles can be assured like a programmed release <strong>of</strong> drug molecules in drug delivery devices.<br />
The polymer quality to be used will, <strong>of</strong> course, depend on the intention <strong>of</strong> the final product. In<br />
the cosmetic industry, where one is looking for an essential oil product, free-flowing <strong>and</strong> dry, to<br />
mix with a semisolid or a solid matrix, the use <strong>of</strong> simple starch derivatives will be very good.<br />
For other applications, where the release <strong>of</strong> the volatiles needs to be controlled or predicted more<br />
accurately, it is recommended that a more thorough selection <strong>of</strong> a well-characterized polymer is<br />
done. One example <strong>of</strong> a very good <strong>and</strong> controllable polymer is alginate. This polymer is available<br />
in many qualities <strong>and</strong> can be tailored to any controlled release product. The chemistry <strong>of</strong><br />
alginate is briefly discussed below as this discussion will allow the reader to decide whether to<br />
opt for an alginate <strong>of</strong> technical quality or, if a high-tech product is the aim, to choose a better<br />
characterized hydrocolloid.
Encapsulation <strong>and</strong> Other Programmed Release Techniques 859<br />
17.4 ALGINATE<br />
Alginates are naturally occurring polycarbohydrates consisting <strong>of</strong> the monomers a-l-glucuronic<br />
acid (G) <strong>and</strong> b-d-mannuronic acid (M). The relative amounts <strong>of</strong> these two building blocks will<br />
influence the total chemistry <strong>of</strong> the polymer. The linear polymer is water soluble due to its polarity.<br />
Today the alginate can be produced by the bacteria that allow us to control the composition <strong>of</strong> the<br />
monomers (G/M ratio). The chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the alginate is dependent on the origin <strong>of</strong> the<br />
raw material. The marine species display seasonal differences in the composition <strong>and</strong> different parts<br />
<strong>of</strong> the plant produce different alginates. Alginates may undergo epimerization to obtain the preferred<br />
chemical composition. This composition (G/M ratio) will determine the diffusion rate through<br />
the swollen alginate gel, which surrounds the encapsulated essential oils (Elias, 1997; Amsden,<br />
1998a, 1998b; Ogston, 1973). An important structure parameter is also the distribution <strong>of</strong> the carboxyl<br />
groups along the polymer chain. The molecular weight <strong>of</strong> the polymer is equally important,<br />
<strong>and</strong> molecular weights between 12,000 <strong>and</strong> 250,000 are readily available in the market. The alginate<br />
polymer can form a swollen gel by hydrophobic interaction or by cross-linking with divalent<br />
ions like calcium. The G/M ratio determines the swelling rate <strong>and</strong> therefore also the release <strong>of</strong><br />
encapsulated compounds. The diffusion <strong>of</strong> different substances has been studied <strong>and</strong> references can<br />
be made to essential oil encapsulation. The size <strong>of</strong> alginate capsules can also vary from 100 μm or<br />
more down to the nanometer range depending on the production procedure chosen (Draget et al.,<br />
1994, 1997; Donati et al., 2005; Tønnesen <strong>and</strong> Karlsen, 2002; Shilpa, 2003).<br />
17.5 STABILIZATION OF ESSENTIAL OIL CONSTITUENTS<br />
The encapsulation <strong>of</strong> essential oils in a hydrophilic polymer may stabilize the constituents <strong>of</strong> the oil<br />
but a better technique for this purpose will <strong>of</strong>ten be to use cyclodextrins in the encapsulation process.<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> cyclodextrins will lead to a complexation <strong>of</strong> the single compounds, which will again<br />
stabilize the complexed molecule. Complex formation with cyclodextrins is <strong>of</strong>ten used in drug<br />
delivery to promote solubility <strong>of</strong> lipophilic compounds; however, in the case <strong>of</strong> volatiles containing<br />
compounds that may oxidize, the complex formation will definitely prolong the shelf life <strong>of</strong> the<br />
finished product. A good review <strong>of</strong> the flavor encapsulation advantages is given by Risch <strong>and</strong><br />
Reineccius (1988). The most important aspect <strong>of</strong> essential oil encapsulation in a hydrophilic polymer<br />
is that the volatility is lowered. Lowering the volatility will result in longer shelf life <strong>of</strong> products<br />
<strong>and</strong> a better stability <strong>of</strong> the finished product in this respect.<br />
17.6 CONTROLLED RELEASE OF VOLATILES FROM<br />
NONVOLATILE PRECURSORS<br />
The limited effect <strong>of</strong> volatiles for olfactive perception has led to the development <strong>of</strong> encapsulated<br />
volatiles <strong>and</strong> also to the development <strong>of</strong> covalent-bonded fragrance molecules to matrices. In this<br />
way, molecules release their fragrance components by the cleavage <strong>of</strong> the covalent bond. Mild reaction<br />
conditions met in practical life initiated by light, pH, hydrolysis, temperature, oxygen, <strong>and</strong><br />
enzymes may release the flavors. The production <strong>of</strong> “pr<strong>of</strong>ragrances” is a very active field for the<br />
industry <strong>and</strong> has led to numerous patents. The plants producing essential oils have invented means<br />
by which the volatiles are produced, stored, <strong>and</strong> released into the atmosphere at predestined times<br />
related to the environmental factors. The making <strong>of</strong> a pr<strong>of</strong>ragrance involves mimicking these natural<br />
procedures into flavor products. However, we are simplifying the process by using only one<br />
parameter in this release process, that is, the splitting <strong>of</strong> a covalent bond. In theory, the making <strong>of</strong> a<br />
long-lasting biological impact <strong>and</strong> the breakdown <strong>of</strong> a constituent are contradictory reactions.<br />
However, in practice the use <strong>of</strong> a covalent bond <strong>and</strong> thereafter the control <strong>of</strong> the splitting <strong>of</strong> this<br />
bond by parameters such as light, humidity, temperature, <strong>and</strong> so on can be built into suitable flavor
860 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> fragrance products. Naturally, this technique using covalent bonding is only applicable to single<br />
essential oil constituents but constitutes a follow-up <strong>of</strong> essential oil encapsulation (Herrmann, 2004,<br />
2007; Powell, 2006).<br />
17.7 CYCLODEXTRIN COMPLEXATION OF VOLATILES<br />
Cyclodextrin molecules are modified carbohydrates that have been used for many years to modify<br />
the solubility properties <strong>of</strong> drug molecules by complexation. The cyclodextrin can also be applied<br />
to volatiles to protect them against the environmental hazards <strong>and</strong> thus prolong the shelf life <strong>of</strong> these<br />
compounds. Cyclodextrin complexation will also modify the volatility <strong>of</strong> the essential oils <strong>and</strong> prolong<br />
the bioactivity. The cyclodextrins will give a molecular encapsulation by the complexation<br />
reaction with volatile molecules. The complexation <strong>of</strong> the volatiles with cyclodextrin may improve<br />
the heat stability, improve the stability toward oxygen, <strong>and</strong> improve the stability against light (Szente,<br />
1988). A significant lowering <strong>of</strong> the volatility has been observed for the complexation with essential<br />
oils (Risch <strong>and</strong> Reineccius, 1988). The complexation <strong>of</strong> essential oils by the use <strong>of</strong> cyclodextrins<br />
will also result in increased heat stability. This is in contrast with the stability <strong>of</strong> volatiles that have<br />
been adsorbed on a polymer matrix. The use <strong>of</strong> cyclodextrins can protect the volatiles against<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> volatiles upon storage <strong>of</strong> a finished product<br />
Light-induced instability<br />
Heat decomposition<br />
Production <strong>of</strong> free-flowing “dry” powders<br />
Oxidation.<br />
17.8 CONCLUDING REMARKS<br />
The encapsulation/complexation <strong>of</strong> essential oils, volatiles, or single oil constituents will result in a<br />
remarkable lowering <strong>of</strong> the volatility, stabilize the constituents, improve the shelf life <strong>of</strong> finished<br />
products, <strong>and</strong> prolong the biological activity. The control <strong>of</strong> these parameters will depend on the<br />
nature <strong>of</strong> the volatiles to be encapsulated. Most <strong>of</strong> the literature on the encapsulation <strong>of</strong> volatiles is<br />
found in the patent literature. Techniques described in the literature allow the user <strong>of</strong> essential oils<br />
to choose the polymer matrix in which to encapsulate an essential oil according to the use <strong>of</strong> the<br />
finished product. The effect <strong>of</strong> controlled delivery <strong>of</strong> flavor <strong>and</strong> fragrance molecules opens up large<br />
areas <strong>of</strong> applications, which previously were limited due to the volatility <strong>of</strong> the essential oils <strong>and</strong><br />
their constituents. The encapsulation or lowering the volatility <strong>of</strong> compounds like essential oil<br />
ingredients will allow for more relevant studies <strong>of</strong> the biological effects <strong>of</strong> volatile compounds.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Amsden, B., 1998a. Solute diffusion within hydrogels. Macromolecules, 31: 8382–8395.<br />
Amsden, B., 1998b. Solute diffusion in hydrogels. Polym. Gels Networks, 6: 13–43.<br />
Deasy, P.B., 1984. Microencapsulation <strong>and</strong> Related Drug Processes. New York: Marcel Dekker.<br />
Donati, I., S. Holtan, Y.A. Morch, M. Borgogna, M. Dentini, <strong>and</strong> G. Skjåk-Bræk, 2005. New hypothesis on the<br />
role <strong>of</strong> alternating sequences in calcium-alginate gels. Biomacromolecules, 6: 1031–1040.<br />
Draget, K.I., G. Skjåk-Bræk, B.E. Christensen, O. Gåserød, <strong>and</strong> O. Smidsrød, 1997. Swelling <strong>and</strong> partial solubization<br />
<strong>of</strong> alginic acid beads in acids. Carbohydr. Polym., 29: 209–215.<br />
Draget, K.I., G. Skjåk-Bræk, <strong>and</strong> O. Smidsrød, 1994. Alginic acid gels; the effect <strong>of</strong> alginate chemical composition<br />
<strong>and</strong> molecular weight. Carbohydr. Polym., 25: 31–38.<br />
Elias, H.-G., 1997. An Introduction to Polymer <strong>Science</strong>. Weinheim, Germany: VCH.<br />
Fulger, C. <strong>and</strong> M. Popplewell, 1997. Flavour encapsulation. U.S. Patent 5.601.845.<br />
Fulger, C. <strong>and</strong> M. Popplewell, 1998. Flavour encapsulation. U.S. Patent 5.792.505.<br />
Herrmann, A., 2004. Photochemical fragrance delivery systems based on the norrish type II reaction—a review.<br />
Spectrum, 17: 10–13 <strong>and</strong> 19.
Encapsulation <strong>and</strong> Other Programmed Release Techniques 861<br />
Herrmann, A., 2007. Controlled release <strong>of</strong> volatiles under mild reaction conditions: From nature to everyday<br />
products. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 46: 5836–5863.<br />
McIver, B., 2005. Encapsulation <strong>of</strong> flavour <strong>and</strong>/or fragrance composition. U.S. Patent 6.932.982.<br />
Ogston, A.G., B.N. Preston, <strong>and</strong> J.D. Wells, 1973. On the transport <strong>of</strong> compact particles through solutions <strong>of</strong><br />
chain polymers. Proc. R. Soc. (London) A, 333: 297–309.<br />
Porzio, M., 2008. Melt extrusion <strong>and</strong> melt injection. Perfumer Flavorist, 33: 48–53.<br />
Powell, K., J. Benkh<strong>of</strong>f, W. Fischer, <strong>and</strong> K. Fritsche, 2006. Secret sensations: Novel functionalities triggered by<br />
light—Part II: Photolatent fragrances. Eur. Coat. J., 9: 40–49.<br />
Risch, S.J. <strong>and</strong> G.A. Reineccius, 1988. Flavor Encapsulation. ACS Symposium Series 370, American Chemical<br />
Society, Washington.<br />
Sair, L., 1980b. Food supplement concentrate in a dense glass house extrudate. U.S. Patent 4.232.047.<br />
Sair, L. <strong>and</strong> R. Sair, 1980a. Encapsulation <strong>of</strong> active agents as microdispersions in homogeneous natural<br />
polymers. U.S. Patent 4.230.687.<br />
Shilpa, A., S.S. Agarwal, <strong>and</strong> A.R. Ray, 2003. Controlled delivery <strong>of</strong> drugs from alginate matrix. Macromol.<br />
Sci. Polym. Rev., C, 43: 187–221.<br />
Szente, L. <strong>and</strong> J. Szejtli, 1988. Stabilization <strong>of</strong> flavors by cyclodextrins. In: Flavor Encapsulation, S.J. Risch<br />
(ed.), pp. 148–157. ACS Symposium Series 370, Washington DC: American Chemical Society.<br />
Tønnesen, H.H. <strong>and</strong> J. Karlsen, 2002. Alginate in drug delivery systems. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 28:<br />
621–630.<br />
Zasypkin, D. <strong>and</strong> M. Porzio, 2004. Glass encapsulation <strong>of</strong> flavours with chemically modified starch blends.<br />
J. Microencapsulation, 21: 385–397.
18<br />
Aroma-Vital Cuisine<br />
Healthy <strong>and</strong> Delightful<br />
Consumption by the<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Maria M. Kettenring <strong>and</strong> Lara-M. Vucemilovic-Geeganage<br />
CONTENTS<br />
18.1 Basic Principles <strong>of</strong> the Aroma-Vital Cuisine .................................................................. 864<br />
18.1.1 The Heart <strong>of</strong> Culinary Arts is Based on Exquisite Ingredients <strong>and</strong><br />
an Accomplished Rounding ............................................................................... 864<br />
18.1.2 Quality Criteria <strong>and</strong> Specifics that have to be Adhered to, while<br />
H<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> for Food Preparation ................................................... 864<br />
18.1.3 Storage ............................................................................................................... 865<br />
18.1.4 Quantity ............................................................................................................. 865<br />
18.1.5 Emulsifiers <strong>and</strong> Forms <strong>of</strong> Administering .......................................................... 865<br />
18.1.6 To Add Spice with Natural Aromas in a Balanced Way .................................... 865<br />
18.1.7 <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> are able to Lift Our Spirits as well ............................................. 866<br />
18.2 A Small Culinary Trip: Aroma-Vital Cuisine Recipes <strong>and</strong> Introduction ....................... 866<br />
Your nourishment ought to be your remedies <strong>and</strong> your medicaments shall be your food.<br />
—Hippocrates<br />
Certainly, the value <strong>of</strong> our nutrition, in terms <strong>of</strong> nutritional physiology, is not only conditioned by its<br />
nutrient <strong>and</strong> calorie contents. Moreover, also health-conscious <strong>and</strong> constitutional eating habits<br />
require an adequate preparation <strong>of</strong> meals as well as an appropriate form <strong>of</strong> presentation. Early<br />
sophisticated civilizations <strong>and</strong> their health doctrines, like that <strong>of</strong> the Traditional Chinese Medicine<br />
(TCM), Ayurveda in Southeast Asia, <strong>and</strong> for instance the medical schools during the ancient Greek<br />
period examined individuals <strong>and</strong> their reaction on life circumstances, habits, nutrition, <strong>and</strong><br />
substances, to contribute to a long-lasting health. To support a person’s balance the aim was to<br />
develop a conscious way <strong>of</strong> using the senses <strong>and</strong> a balanced sensory perception.<br />
Thus fragrances are a kind <strong>of</strong> soul food, as the information <strong>of</strong> scents can be perceived in every section<br />
<strong>of</strong> our self, physical, energetic as well as intellectual, from a holistic point <strong>of</strong> view. Adding spice<br />
with essential oils according to the Aroma-Vital cuisine combines sensuality with sanative potential.<br />
People across continents <strong>and</strong> cultures have experimented with the healing virtues <strong>of</strong> “nature’s<br />
bouquet” or just simply tried to enhance the flavor <strong>and</strong> vitality <strong>of</strong> their meals. The ancient Egyptian<br />
civilization reverted to an elaborated dinner ceremony by using the efficacy <strong>of</strong> essential oils to get<br />
863
864 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
the participants in the mood for the meal. Before the food was served, heated chalices with scented<br />
fats, enriched with a variety <strong>of</strong> herbs <strong>and</strong> spices were provided, not only to spread pleasant smells,<br />
rather as a kind <strong>of</strong> odorous aperitif to activate ones saliva to prepare for digestion. Meals that have<br />
been enriched with essential oils or expressed oils, rebound to a conscious awareness <strong>of</strong> consuming<br />
food, are well-nigh comparable, like going on a culinary expedition. This fare is perceived as a<br />
composition <strong>of</strong> tastes, which is not only tastefully ingenious, but also might be able to raise the<br />
food’s virtue.<br />
In this regard the entropy rather than the potency <strong>of</strong> the condiment is significant. The abundance<br />
<strong>of</strong> nuances, the art <strong>of</strong> adding flavor on the cusp <strong>of</strong> being noticeable, becomes more important than<br />
giving aroma <strong>of</strong>ficiously. The scents hovering above the meals, almost like a slight breeze, compound<br />
the food’s own natural flavor in a subtle manner. “Less is more” is the economic approach<br />
which in this context is indicative.<br />
The sensation <strong>of</strong> satiety is taking place early on. Due to this desire to savor to the fullest, the taste<br />
is excited <strong>and</strong> leads to longer chewing. This in turn activates a-amylase (amylolytic enzyme, already<br />
working in the oral cavity). Conditionally on the high bioavailability, especially <strong>of</strong> the monoterpenes,<br />
which are significant <strong>and</strong> available in the paring <strong>of</strong> citrus fruits <strong>and</strong> some kind <strong>of</strong> herbs, in a<br />
sense the Aroma-Vital cuisine shows aspects <strong>of</strong> the salutary genesis (Salutogenese). The savoriness<br />
<strong>of</strong> the food, pleasant smell, <strong>and</strong> appetizing appearance plays a prominent role here, at last the appetite<br />
regulates between physiological needs <strong>and</strong> pleasure <strong>and</strong> thus variety <strong>and</strong> vitally enhanced meals<br />
are in dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />
18.1 BASIC PRINCIPLES OF THE AROMA-VITAL CUISINE<br />
18.1.1 THE HEART OF CULINARY ARTS IS BASED ON EXQUISITE INGREDIENTS<br />
AND AN ACCOMPLISHED ROUNDING<br />
Natural aromas, from blossoms, herbs, seeds, <strong>and</strong> spices, extracted in artificial pure essential oils,<br />
delicately accompany the elaborate cuisine. They are not supposed to supersede fresh herbs, rather<br />
complementing them. If, however, herbs are not available, natural essences are delightfully suited to<br />
add nuances. They are giving impetus to <strong>and</strong> are flexible assistants for preparing last-minute menus.<br />
One should use this rich source to compile a first-aid assortment <strong>of</strong> condiments or even a mobile<br />
spice rack.<br />
18.1.2 QUALITY CRITERIA AND SPECIFICS THAT HAVE TO BE ADHERED TO,<br />
WHILE HANDLING ESSENTIAL OILS FOR FOOD PREPARATION<br />
The regional legal regulations <strong>of</strong> the food chemical codex or the local food legislation might differ<br />
<strong>and</strong> if one is going to use essential oils pr<strong>of</strong>essionally, one has to be firm with them, but still there<br />
are certain basics that deserve attention <strong>and</strong> lead to a safe <strong>and</strong> healthy way <strong>of</strong> practicing this subtle<br />
culinary art.<br />
For cooking, solely 100% pure essential oils from controlled organic cultivation should be used.<br />
<strong>Oils</strong> that are not available <strong>of</strong> controlled organic origin, particularly those that are cold-pressed,<br />
a residue check should be guaranteed by the manufacturer to ensure that the product does not<br />
contain harmful amounts <strong>of</strong> pesticides. The label should not only contain name, contents, <strong>and</strong><br />
quantity but also<br />
• Latin definition<br />
• Country <strong>of</strong> origin<br />
• Description <strong>of</strong> used plant parts<br />
• Used method <strong>of</strong> extraction
Aroma-Vital Cuisine 865<br />
• Date <strong>of</strong> expiry<br />
• If the oil has been thinned, the exact ratio <strong>of</strong> mixture<br />
• If solvents have been used, they should be mentioned.<br />
For the Aroma-Vital cuisine, the only acceptable solvent would be alcohol. As the oil is used in<br />
very small <strong>and</strong> thinned concentrations it would not be harmful to children. Less qualitative oils<br />
from industrial origin sometimes might even contain other substances. It should be indicated that<br />
natural flavorings used in food production should be pure <strong>and</strong> free <strong>of</strong> animal by-products such as<br />
gelatin or glycerin, which has been obtained by saponification <strong>of</strong> animal fat.<br />
18.1.3 STORAGE<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils are very sensible to the disposure <strong>of</strong> light, air <strong>and</strong> temperature; therefore they should<br />
be stored adequately. In this way, long-lasting essential oils keep their aroma as well as their ingredients<br />
<strong>and</strong> might even develop their bouquet. Foods or processed foods with essential oils may not<br />
be stored in tin boxes. Very important: essential oils should be kept away from children.<br />
18.1.4 QUANTITY<br />
The internal use <strong>of</strong> essential oils has to be practiced carefully. This subtle art is an amazing tool, but<br />
swallowed in too huge amounts, they are bad for one’s health. One should never add the pure<br />
concentrate <strong>of</strong> essential oils to foods; it should not be forgotten that 1 drop is <strong>of</strong>ten comparable to a<br />
huge amount <strong>of</strong> plant material. Therefore, they ought to be always thinned <strong>and</strong> the dilution should<br />
be used teaspoon by teaspoon.<br />
18.1.5 EMULSIFIERS AND FORMS OF ADMINISTERING<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils are not water soluble; therefore, emulsifiers are necessary to spread their aroma, they<br />
are for example<br />
1. Basic oils, special oils, or macerated oils<br />
2. Butter, milk, curd, egg yolk, <strong>and</strong> mayonnaise<br />
3. Alcohol <strong>and</strong> vinegar<br />
4. Syrups, molasses, honeys, treacles, <strong>and</strong> sugars<br />
5. Salt<br />
6. T<strong>of</strong>u, soy sauce <strong>and</strong> tamarind sauce<br />
7. Avocado, lemon juice, <strong>and</strong> coconut<br />
8. Sesame seeds, sunflower seeds, almonds, <strong>and</strong> walnuts.<br />
On the basis <strong>of</strong> these emulsifiers <strong>and</strong> a mixture <strong>of</strong> essential oils, a variety <strong>of</strong> “culinary assistants”<br />
can be conjured up: spiced oils, spiced butter or mayonnaises, spiced alcohols, spiced syrups, spiced<br />
sauces, or even spiced salts. These blends can be prepared in advance <strong>and</strong> stored to use them for<br />
everyday meals. Another nice variation is the use <strong>of</strong> hydrolates (a partial extract <strong>of</strong> plant material<br />
extracted by distillation) such as rose water, for food preparation.<br />
18.1.6 TO ADD SPICE WITH NATURAL AROMAS IN A BALANCED WAY<br />
To know how food <strong>and</strong> essential oils interact is a great help to create a harmonic assembly <strong>of</strong> foods,<br />
which is nourishing us from a holistic point <strong>of</strong> view. In this manner, the sun-pervaded seed oils <strong>of</strong><br />
anise, bay, dill, fennel, or caraway might be able to aerate the earthy corm- <strong>and</strong> root-vegetable.<br />
Salads can be enhanced <strong>and</strong> prepared to be more digestive by adding pure natural essential oils such<br />
as thyme, rosemary, <strong>and</strong> clementine to the marinade, or another rather Asian variation would be to<br />
add ginger, pepper, <strong>and</strong> lemon grass.
866 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
18.1.7 ESSENTIAL OILS ARE ABLE TO LIFT OUR SPIRITS AS WELL<br />
A condiment ensemble <strong>of</strong> orange, vanilla extract, cacao extract, <strong>and</strong> rose for example, is able to support<br />
soul foods such as milk rice, milk shakes, <strong>and</strong> desserts in their attitude to supply security <strong>and</strong><br />
confidence.<br />
18.2 A SMALL CULINARY TRIP: AROMA-VITAL CUISINE<br />
RECIPES AND INTRODUCTION<br />
TABLE 18.1<br />
Basic Spice Rack <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>: How to Prepare <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Mixtures <strong>and</strong> <strong>Essential</strong><br />
Oil Seasonings<br />
Basic <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Mixtures<br />
Emulsifier<br />
Seasonings<br />
EURO ASIA<br />
Recipes Example<br />
Lime (Citrus aurantiifolia) 5 drops 1. Oil 50 mL sesame oil Asian style<br />
2. Dairy prod. 50 mL mayonnaise Eggs<br />
Cori<strong>and</strong>er seed (cori<strong>and</strong>rum sativum) 1 drop 3. Vinegar 50 mL rice vinegar Sushi<br />
4. Sweetener 50 mL agave syrup Chutney<br />
Ginger (Zingiber <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis) 2 drops 5. Salt 50 mg sea-salt Spice<br />
6. T<strong>of</strong>u <strong>and</strong> co 50 mL soy sauce Marinated fried t<strong>of</strong>u<br />
Lemongras (Cymbopogon citratus) 1 drop 7. Vegetables 50 mL coconut milk Rice <strong>and</strong> curry<br />
<strong>and</strong> fruits<br />
8. Nuts <strong>and</strong> seeds 50 mg sesame seeds Spice<br />
Green pepper (Piper nigrum) 1 drop<br />
O SOLE MIO<br />
1. 50 mL olive oil Pasta<br />
Thyme linalool (Thymus vulgaris) 1 drop 2. 50 mL egg yolk Omelette<br />
3. 50 mL balmy vinegar Salad<br />
Rosemary cineole<br />
1/2 drop 4. 50 mL honey Cuisine Provencal<br />
(Rosmarinus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis)<br />
5. 50 mg sea-salt Spice<br />
Clementine (Citrus deliciosa) 5 drops 6. 50 mg t<strong>of</strong>u Grilled t<strong>of</strong>u<br />
7. 50 mg avocado Guacamole<br />
8. Pesto<br />
CAPRI<br />
Orange (Citrus sinensis) 5 drops 1. 50 mL hazelnut oil Desserts<br />
2. 50 mL buttermilk Drink<br />
Lemon (Citrus limon) 3 drops 3. 50 mL cider vinegar Salad<br />
4. 100 mL maple syrup Desserts<br />
5. 50 mg sea-salt Spice<br />
6. 50 mL apple vinegar Fruit salad<br />
7. 50 mg avocado Sauce<br />
8. 50 mg walnuts Cakes<br />
BERGAMOT-GRAND MANIER<br />
Grapefruit (Citrus paradisi) 5 drops 1. 50 mL walnut oil Salad<br />
2. 50 mg butter Cake<br />
continued
Aroma-Vital Cuisine 867<br />
TABLE 18.1 (continued)<br />
Basic Spice Rack <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>: How to Prepare <strong>Essential</strong> Oil Mixtures <strong>and</strong> <strong>Essential</strong><br />
Oil Seasonings<br />
Basic <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Mixtures<br />
Emulsifier<br />
Seasonings<br />
Recipes Example<br />
Orange (Citrus sinensis) 5 drops 3. 1 L white vine Beverage<br />
4. 50 mg raw sugar Sweets<br />
Limon (Citrus limon) 2 drops 5. 50 mg sea-salt Spice<br />
6. 50 mL tamarind sauce Thai cuisine<br />
Bergamot (Citrus bergamia) 2 drops 7. 50 mL lemon juice Drink<br />
8. 50 mg pumpkin seeds Soup<br />
MAGIC ORANGE<br />
Orange (Citrus sinensis) 5 drops 1. 50 mL almond oil Sweets<br />
2. 50 mg goat cheese Oriental<br />
Vanillaextract (Vanilla planifolia) 3 drops 3. 50 mL raspberry vinegar Fruit salad<br />
or balsamic vinegar<br />
4. 100 mL honey/treacle Sweets<br />
Kakaoextract (Theobroma cacao) 3 drops 5. —<br />
6. 50 mL seitan t<strong>of</strong>u Oriental<br />
Rose (Rosa damascena) 1/2 drop 7. 50 mg bananas Desserts<br />
8. 50 mg almonds Spice<br />
CLARY SAGE AND BERGAMOT<br />
Clary sage (Salvia sclarea) 2 drops Spice<br />
Bergamot (Citrus bergamia) 5 drops 5. 50 g sea-salt<br />
Peppermint (Mentha piperita)<br />
Lavender (Lav<strong>and</strong>ula <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis)<br />
PEPPERMINT<br />
Rather less—2 4. 100 mL maple syrup Drink<br />
drops per<br />
100 mL/mg<br />
LAVENDER<br />
Rather less—2 4. 100 mL honey Cuisine Provencal<br />
drops per<br />
100 mL/mg<br />
MENU<br />
BASICS<br />
Crispy Coconut Flakes (Flexible Asian Spice Variation)<br />
Gomasio (Sesame Sea-Salt Spice)<br />
Honey Provencal<br />
BEVERAGES<br />
Aroma Shake with Herbs<br />
Earl Grey at His Best<br />
Lara’s Jamu<br />
Rose-Cider<br />
Syrup Mint-Orange
868 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
ENTREES<br />
a. Soups:<br />
Peppermint Heaven<br />
Perky Pumpkin Soup<br />
b. Salads:<br />
Melon-Plum Purple Radish Salad<br />
Salad with Goat Cheese <strong>and</strong> Ricotta<br />
APPETIZER AND FINGER FOOD<br />
Crudities—Flavored Crispy Raw Vegetables<br />
Maria’s Dip<br />
Tapenade<br />
T<strong>of</strong>u Aromanaise<br />
Vegetable Skewer<br />
MAIN COURSE<br />
Celery—Lemon Grass Patties<br />
Chèvre Chaude-Goat Cheese “Provence” with Pineapple<br />
Crispy Wild Rice-Chapatis<br />
Mango–Dates–Orange Chutney<br />
Prawns Bergamot<br />
DESSERT, CAKES, AND BAKED GOODS<br />
Apple Cake Rose<br />
Chocolate Fruits <strong>and</strong> Leaves<br />
Homemade Fresh Berry Jelly<br />
Rose Semifreddo<br />
Sweet Florentines<br />
(Chocolate should not be heated up more than 40°. <strong>Essential</strong> oils are best at 40° as well.)<br />
AROMA-VITAL CUISINE RECIPES<br />
BASICS<br />
Crispy Coconut Flakes (Flexible Asian Spice Variation)<br />
Nice with Asian flavored dishes or sweet baked goods.<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 50 g dried coconut flakes<br />
– 10 drops EURO ASIA intermixture (spicy variation) or 10 drops MAGIC ORANGE intermixture<br />
(sweet variation)<br />
– 1 preserving jar.<br />
Preparation: Roast the coconut flakes in a frying pan. Lightly scatter the chosen essential oils into<br />
the empty jar. Spread the oil well, then fill in the roasted coconut rasps <strong>and</strong> shake it well.<br />
Gomasio (A Sesame Sea-Salt Spice)<br />
Gomasio is a secret <strong>of</strong> the Middle Eastern cuisine, which completes your spice rack <strong>and</strong> gives a<br />
subtle salty flavor to the dish. Nice to combine with soy sauce, fresh thyme leaves, or cumin.
Aroma-Vital Cuisine 869<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 50 g sesame seeds<br />
– 1 teaspoon EURO ASIA seasoning salt no. 5<br />
– 1 preserving jar.<br />
Preparation: Roast the sesame seeds in a frying pan, then mix the seeds with the salt in a mortar.<br />
Crush them lightly with a pestle to release the flavor. Fill into a preserving jar <strong>and</strong> shake it well. If<br />
necessary add a few more drops <strong>of</strong> EURO ASIA intermixture.<br />
Honey Provencal<br />
A great basic for the cuisine Provencal.<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 100 ml acacia honey<br />
– 5 drops O SOLE MIO intermixture<br />
– 2 drops LAVENDER pure essential oil<br />
– 1 drop EURO ASIA intermixture<br />
– 1 drop CLARY SAGE AND BERGAMOT intermixture.<br />
Preparation: Emulsify the ingredients well. Use the honey to brush grilled vegetables, t<strong>of</strong>u,<br />
goat <strong>and</strong> sheep cheese, or to season gratins, to add a fabulous distinctly French flavor to a<br />
simple dish.<br />
BEVERAGES<br />
Aroma Shake with Herbs<br />
This green fruity flavored cleansing juice certainly is a great rejuvenator.<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 500 mL organic buttermilk<br />
– 100 mL organic soy milk<br />
– 5 tablespoons sprouts (alfalfa, adzuki bean sprouts, <strong>and</strong> cress)<br />
– 100 mL carrot juice<br />
– 3 drops CAPRI intermixture<br />
– 2 drops EURO ASIA intermixture<br />
– 1 tablespoon maple syrup<br />
– 1 tablespoon parsley finely chopped.<br />
Preparation: Pour the buttermilk <strong>and</strong> soy milk in a blender <strong>and</strong> process for a few minutes until<br />
combined. Add the carrot juice, then emulsify the essential oils with the maple syrup <strong>and</strong> stir it<br />
into the mixture. Fill into iced tall glasses <strong>and</strong> serve chilled. A decorative idea is to dive the top<br />
<strong>of</strong> the glasses into lemon juice <strong>and</strong> then into the finely chopped parsley, before filling in the<br />
shake.<br />
Earl Grey at His Best<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 1 preserving jar (100 g capacity)<br />
– 100 g Darjeeling tea “first flush”<br />
– 10 drops BERGAMOT basic essential oil.
870 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Preparation: Lightly scatter the “BERGAMOT” basic essential oil into the empty jar. Add the tea,<br />
close the jar <strong>and</strong> shake it well. Repeat the procedure to shake the jug for the next 5–10 days; then<br />
this incredible sort <strong>of</strong> flavored tea will be ready to serve.<br />
Lara’s Jamu<br />
Jamu is a kind <strong>of</strong> herbal tonic from Southeast Asia. Every country <strong>and</strong> family has their own recipes.<br />
This one is a tasty booster for the immune system.<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– The rind <strong>of</strong> two limes in thin shreds<br />
– Juice <strong>of</strong> two limes<br />
– 2 tablespoons freshly grated ginger<br />
– 1 h<strong>and</strong>ful fresh or dried nettle<br />
– 50 ml maple treacle<br />
– 2 teaspoons curcuma powder<br />
– 500 ml water<br />
– 750 ml <strong>of</strong> sparkling water (optional)<br />
– 5 drops EURO ASIA intermixture<br />
– 2 drops PEPPERMINT basic essential oil<br />
– 3 drops CAPRI intermixture.<br />
Courtesy <strong>of</strong> Subash J. Geeganage.<br />
Preparation: Boil the mixture <strong>of</strong> lime, ginger, <strong>and</strong> nettle with 500 ml water for 10 min; then let it<br />
cool down a bit to be able to sieve it later into decorative chalices. Mix the curcuma powder with<br />
fresh lime juice <strong>and</strong> the EURO ASIA basic essential oil <strong>and</strong> stir it into the herbal mixture. Now the<br />
maple treacle mixed with PEPPERMINT basic essential oil will be stirred in as a sweetener. Serve<br />
hot or chilled with sparkling water, fresh mint sprigs, <strong>and</strong> sliced lime.<br />
Rose-Cider<br />
Refreshing <strong>and</strong> inspiring.<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 1 L cider<br />
– 1/2 drop rose basic essential oil or 1 tablespoon organic rose water.
Aroma-Vital Cuisine 871<br />
Preparation: Stir in the rose oil or rose water. Serve cold.<br />
Syrup Mint-Orange<br />
A refreshing hot summer drink.<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 50 mL PEPPERMINT seasoning syrup no. 4<br />
– 5 drops CAPRI intermixture.<br />
Preparation: Simply mix the ingredients <strong>and</strong> you have a refreshing basic syrup, which can be used<br />
for drinks, baked goods, to pour it into soda water, tea juices, or even into ice cubes. To serve,<br />
garnish the drinks with some fresh peppermint leaves.<br />
ENTREES<br />
Soups<br />
Peppermint Heaven<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 500 mL vegetable stock<br />
– Fresh peppermint leaves for decoration<br />
– 2–3 drops PEPPERMINT basic essential oil<br />
– 1 drop BERGAMOT basic essential oil<br />
– 150 mL cream<br />
– O SOLE MIO salt no. 5 or regular salt to season to taste.<br />
Preparation: Whip the cream; then add the basic essential oils to it. Meanwhile boil the vegetable<br />
stock; then stir in the cream. Ladle into soup bowls to serve <strong>and</strong> garnish each with a little bit<br />
whipped cream <strong>and</strong> fresh mint leaves.<br />
Perky Pumpkin Soup<br />
Warm <strong>and</strong> spicy—the perfect autumn dinner.<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 2 drops CAPRI intermixture<br />
– 1 large onion, finely chopped<br />
– 2 carrots, sliced finely<br />
– 1 tablespoon pumpkin seed-oil or butter<br />
– 500 g peeled pumpkin, finely chopped into cubes<br />
– 200 mL vegetable stock<br />
– 50 mL cream<br />
– 1 teaspoon curry powder<br />
– 1 tablespoon EURO ASIA seasoning oil no. 1<br />
– Fresh cori<strong>and</strong>er to garnish<br />
– 1 tablespoon CAPRI seasoning salt no. 5<br />
– A little bit sherry.<br />
Preparation: Heat the pumpkin seed oil in a saucepan. Add the onion <strong>and</strong> carrots <strong>and</strong> cook over<br />
moderate heat until it s<strong>of</strong>tens. Stir in the pumpkin pieces <strong>and</strong> cook until the pumpkin is s<strong>of</strong>t. Process<br />
the mixture in a blender <strong>and</strong> pour it to the pan. Stir in the vegetable stock <strong>and</strong> cream <strong>and</strong> season with<br />
the essential oils, salt, <strong>and</strong> sherry. Ladle into warm soup bowls <strong>and</strong> garnish each with some fresh<br />
cori<strong>and</strong>er leaves.
872 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Salads<br />
Melon-Plum Purple Radish Salad<br />
A refreshing hot summer party dish.<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 1 mid-size watermelon or 2 Galia melons<br />
– 1 h<strong>and</strong>ful radishes rinsed <strong>and</strong> chopped<br />
– 1 bell pepper rinsed <strong>and</strong> sliced<br />
– 3 pears rinsed <strong>and</strong> chopped<br />
– Juice <strong>of</strong> 1 lemon<br />
– 1 tablespoon CAPRI or O SOLE MIO seasoning oil no. 1<br />
– 250 g sour cream<br />
– 150 g curd<br />
– Salt<br />
– Freshly ground black pepper<br />
– Some fresh summer herbs like thyme, cress or lemon balm.<br />
Courtesy <strong>of</strong> Ulla Mayer-Raichle.<br />
Preparation: Half the melon in a zigzag manner, separate the halves, remove the seeds from the<br />
melon halves, <strong>and</strong> use a melon baller to scoop out even-sized balls. Place the half <strong>of</strong> the melon balls,<br />
radishes, bell pepper, <strong>and</strong> pears in a large salad bowl <strong>and</strong> marinade the salad with lemon juice. Then<br />
store the melon halves <strong>and</strong> the salad in the fridge for at least half an hour. Meanwhile mix the<br />
seasoning oil <strong>of</strong> your choice with sour cream <strong>and</strong> curd <strong>and</strong> season with salt <strong>and</strong> pepper. Stir the<br />
mixture into the salad carefully <strong>and</strong> fill the salad into the melon halves. Garnish them with herbs<br />
<strong>and</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the extra melon balls.<br />
Salad with Goat Cheese <strong>and</strong> Ricotta<br />
A refreshing companion for spicy foods.<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 1 red bell pepper rinsed, sliced<br />
– 1 green bell pepper rinsed, sliced<br />
– 1 scallion, chopped<br />
– 1 head salad greens (Aragula, Sorrel, D<strong>and</strong>elion, etc.), rinsed, dried, <strong>and</strong> chopped.
Aroma-Vital Cuisine 873<br />
For the salad dressing:<br />
– 1 drop O SOLE MIO intermixture<br />
– 3 drops CAPRI intermixture<br />
– 4 tablespoons dark olive oil<br />
– Juice <strong>of</strong> 1 lemon<br />
– Sea-salt<br />
– 100 g goat cheese or ricotta, chopped<br />
– 1/2 h<strong>and</strong>ful fresh eatable spring blossoms (daisies, primroses, etc.), rinsed<br />
– 2 h<strong>and</strong>fuls fresh herbs <strong>of</strong> your choice (cori<strong>and</strong>er, parsley, basil, etc.), rinsed<br />
– Roasted sesame.<br />
Preparation: Emulsify the essential oil intermixtures with the olive oil; add the lemon juice <strong>and</strong> season<br />
with salt. Place the dressing in a large bowl, marinade the cheese, <strong>and</strong> add the salad leaves, bell<br />
peppers, <strong>and</strong> scallion. Mix well <strong>and</strong> garnish with the herbs <strong>and</strong> blossoms <strong>and</strong> the roasted sesame.<br />
APPETIZER AND FINGER FOOD<br />
Crudities—Flavored Crispy Raw Vegetables<br />
Simple <strong>and</strong> delicious.<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 750 g vegetables well rinsed <strong>and</strong> cut into crudities (radishes, scallions, chicory, carrots, etc.)<br />
– Juice <strong>of</strong> 1 lemon<br />
– 5 drops CAPRI intermixture.<br />
Preparation: Emulsify the CAPRI intermixture into the lemon juice, fill it into a spray flacon, <strong>and</strong><br />
spread it on top <strong>of</strong> the sliced vegetables. Serve with dip <strong>and</strong> breadsticks or baguette.<br />
Maria’s Dip<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 3 drops CAPRI intermixture<br />
– 1 tablespoon creme fraiche<br />
– 1/2 teaspoon salt<br />
– 250 g sour cream.<br />
Preparation: Emulsify the CAPRI essential oil intermixture into the creme fraiche. Stir in the salt<br />
<strong>and</strong> sour cream until combined. Ready to serve with bread, toast, <strong>and</strong> for example, the flavored<br />
crudities.<br />
Tapenade<br />
An Italian secret simple to make <strong>and</strong> perfect for dipping or seasoning.<br />
Ingredients:<br />
For the olives:<br />
– 200 g pitted green or black olives, rinsed <strong>and</strong> halved<br />
– 100 mL dark olive oil<br />
– 1 h<strong>and</strong>ful fresh rosemary<br />
– 10 drops O SOLE MIO intermixture.
874 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
For the tapenade:<br />
– 60 g capers<br />
– 1 crushed garlic clove<br />
– Freshly ground black pepper.<br />
Preparation: Marinate the olives in a mixture <strong>of</strong> olive oil, rosemary, <strong>and</strong> O SOLE MIO intermixture<br />
for at least 1 h. Place the olives, capers, <strong>and</strong> garlic in a food processor or blender <strong>and</strong> process<br />
until combined. Gradually add the flavored marinade <strong>and</strong> blend to a coarse paste; season with<br />
pepper. Keep stored in the fridge for up to 1 week.<br />
T<strong>of</strong>u Aromanaise<br />
Served with the veggie skewers—a truly impressive dinner party dish.<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 200 g organic pure t<strong>of</strong>u or smoked t<strong>of</strong>u<br />
– 3 tablespoons sunflower oil<br />
– 2 tablespoons EURO ASIA seasoning oil no. 1<br />
– EURO ASIA seasoning salt no. 5<br />
– A few chives.<br />
Preparation: Put the t<strong>of</strong>u in a blender <strong>and</strong> process it until the t<strong>of</strong>u is smooth. Transfer the creamy<br />
t<strong>of</strong>u to a bowl <strong>and</strong> stir in the sunflower oil very slowly, then add the EURO ASIA seasoning oil, <strong>and</strong><br />
season with EURO ASIA salt. Garnish the top with chopped chives. Serve cold.<br />
Veggie Skewers<br />
A tasty idea for your next barbecue.<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 20 skewers<br />
– 1000 g fresh young vegetables<br />
(tomatoes, fennel, eggplants, carrots, bell peppers, scallions, etc.).<br />
For the marinade:<br />
– 5 tablespoons dark olive oil<br />
– 3 tablespoons either O SOLE MIO or EURO ASIA seasoning oil no. 1<br />
– Freshly grounded pepper<br />
– 1 h<strong>and</strong>ful fresh chopped herbs (basil, thyme, parsley, etc.) or dried herbs.<br />
Courtesy <strong>of</strong> Ulla Mayer-Raichle.
Aroma-Vital Cuisine 875<br />
Preparation: Prepare the vegetables <strong>and</strong> cut them into cubes. Mix all the marinade ingredients in a<br />
shallow dish <strong>and</strong> add the vegetable cubes. Spoon the marinade over the vegetables <strong>and</strong> leave to<br />
marinate in the fridge for at least 1 h. Then thread the cubes onto skewers. Brush with the marinade<br />
<strong>and</strong> broil or grill until golden, turning occasionally. Serve with baguette, t<strong>of</strong>u aromannaise tapenade,<br />
or any other dip.<br />
MAIN COURSE<br />
Celery Lemon Grass Patties<br />
Delicious, little, <strong>and</strong> flexible to combine.<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 1–2 large celery<br />
– 250 mL liquid vegetable stock<br />
– 1 organic free range egg<br />
– 4 lemon slices<br />
– 1 pinch <strong>of</strong> BERGAMOT CLARY SAGE no. 5.<br />
Asian variation:<br />
– 3 tablespoons coconut flakes<br />
– 2 tablespoons EURO ASIA seasoning no. 1<br />
– Coconut oil or roasted sesame oil to fry.<br />
Mediterranean variation:<br />
– 2 tablespoons O SOLE MIO seasoning no. 1<br />
– 3 tablespoons sesame seeds<br />
– Soy oil to fry.<br />
Preparation: Blanche the washed <strong>and</strong> sliced celery roots in the vegetable stock. Choose your<br />
favorite cookie cutter, like heart or star, <strong>and</strong> cut them out <strong>of</strong> the blanched celery. Whisk the egg<br />
<strong>and</strong> stir in the essential oil variation <strong>of</strong> your choice. Marinate the celery stars <strong>and</strong> hearts, then coat<br />
them with coconut flakes or sesame seeds <strong>and</strong> fry them until they have a delicious golden brown<br />
color. To serve, top them with a small amount <strong>of</strong> the essential oil seasoning. They are great to<br />
accompany salads, baked potatoes with sour cream, <strong>and</strong> other vegetarian dishes or if you prefer,<br />
beef creations.<br />
Chévre Chaude-Goat Cheese “Provence” with Pineapple<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 4 slices <strong>of</strong> fresh pineapple<br />
– 1 tablespoon sunflower oil or butter or ghee<br />
– 1 teaspoon “O SOLE MIO honey” no. 4<br />
– 1 tablespoon CAPRI honey no. 4<br />
– 2 tablespoons honey PROVENCAL (basics)<br />
– 2–3 small goat or sheep cheese<br />
– A little bit fresh or dried thyme to garnish<br />
– Sour cream<br />
– Salad or Parma ham (optional).
876 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Courtesy <strong>of</strong> Ulla Mayer-Raichle.<br />
Preparation: Halve the pineapple slices <strong>and</strong> fry them on both sides. Lower the heat <strong>and</strong> top them<br />
with CAPRI honey. Preheat the oven to 180°C. Halve the cheese <strong>and</strong> place them on top <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong><br />
the two pineapple slices. Drop a little bit <strong>of</strong> honey PROVENCAL on each portion <strong>and</strong> bake it shortly<br />
until the cheese starts to caramelize. Serve immediately with the rest <strong>of</strong> the aromatized honeys<br />
dispersed on the surface, fresh herbs above, the sour cream on top, <strong>and</strong> with Parma ham or fresh<br />
salad aside.<br />
Crispy Wild Rice-Chapatis<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 200 g wild rice<br />
– 400–500 mL warm water<br />
– 1 laurel leaf<br />
– 1 small onion or 3 scallions, finely chopped<br />
– 1 teaspoon EURO ASIA seasoning oil no. 1<br />
– 1 tablespoon EURO ASIA seasoning soy sauce no. 6<br />
– 2 organic or free range eggs<br />
– Curry powder<br />
– Lemon juice as you like<br />
– Around 2 tablespoons oil or ghee to fry.<br />
Preparation: Steam the wild rice briefly, then fill it up with the rest <strong>of</strong> the warm water, <strong>and</strong> add the<br />
laurel leave. Cook it for another 15–20 min, then turn the heat down <strong>and</strong> stir in the EURO ASIA<br />
seasoning oil no. 1. Cover it, leave it <strong>and</strong> let it chill until firm. Then stir all ingredients into the wild<br />
rice. Divide the mixture into walnut-sized balls; then flatten them slightly. Heat the oil or ghee in a<br />
pan <strong>and</strong> fry the chapatis until golden brown on each side. Drain on paper towels <strong>and</strong> serve at once.<br />
These crispy wild rice-chapatis taste delicious with steamed vegetables <strong>and</strong> dips or even salads.<br />
They are ideal as a snack or a nice idea for the next picnic.<br />
Mango–Dates–Orange Chutney<br />
A spice dip-trip to Asia.<br />
Ingredients:<br />
For 1000 g you need<br />
– 250 g organic well-scrubbed oranges (e.g., sweet <strong>and</strong> juicy sorts like Valencia)<br />
– 250 g onions
Aroma-Vital Cuisine 877<br />
– 250 g sliced mangoes<br />
– 350 mL acacia honey<br />
– If this is not available choose any other treacle or honeys, which is neutral in taste <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
organic origin<br />
– 50 mL maple syrup<br />
– 2 teaspoons CAPRI essential oil seasoning salt no. 5<br />
– A little bit <strong>of</strong> chile powder or 1 fresh chile pepper<br />
– 350 mL cider vinegar<br />
– 250 mg chopped dates<br />
– 50 mL <strong>of</strong> either EURO ASIA<br />
– or MAGIC ORANGE essential oil seasoning vinegar no. 3<br />
– 2 tablespoons CAPRI essential oil seasoning syrup no. 4<br />
– 5 drops pure EURO ASIA condiment intermixture.<br />
Preparation: Remove long, thin shreds <strong>of</strong> orange rind, using a grater (zester). Scrape it firmly along<br />
the surface <strong>of</strong> the fruit. Remove the white layer <strong>of</strong> the oranges; then slice the oranges <strong>and</strong> remove<br />
the pits. Finely chop the onions. Peel the mangoes <strong>and</strong> cut them into small chunks. Mix honey,<br />
syrup, chile powder, <strong>and</strong> vinegar with 1 teaspoon <strong>of</strong> the CAPRI salt no. 5 <strong>and</strong> boil it in a huge saucepan<br />
until the honey melts, stir it well. Add mangoes, onions, dates, oranges, <strong>and</strong> the half <strong>of</strong> the<br />
shredded orange rind. Then lower the heat <strong>and</strong> let it simmer for 1 h, until the mixture has formed a<br />
thick mass. Stir in the rest <strong>of</strong> the shredded orange rind <strong>and</strong> the chosen essential oil vinegar no. 3.<br />
Then emulsify the pure EURO ASIA condiment intermixture into the CAPRI syrup no. 4 <strong>and</strong> stir<br />
it in the chutney. Use the rest <strong>of</strong> the CAPRI salt no. 5 to add spice. Fill the mixture into sterilized<br />
warm preserving jars, store them cold <strong>and</strong> dark. Nice to serve with the Chévre chaude or the crispy<br />
wild rice-chapatis <strong>and</strong> veggie skewers.<br />
Prawns Bergamot<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 500 g large prawns<br />
Marinade:<br />
– 5 drops pure CAPRI essential oil intermixture<br />
– 1 small onion<br />
– 1/2 crushed garlic clove<br />
– 1 h<strong>and</strong>ful flat leaf parsley<br />
– 3 scallions<br />
– Juice <strong>of</strong> a lemon<br />
– 2 drops pure BERGAMOT essential oil<br />
– 1/2 teaspoon fennel seed<br />
– 6 tablespoons olive oil<br />
– Salt <strong>and</strong> fresh pepper<br />
– 3 tablespoons BERGAMOT–GRAND MANIER vine no. 3.<br />
Preparation: Prepare <strong>and</strong> wash the prawns as usual. Slice the onions <strong>and</strong> garlic, chop the parsley<br />
finely <strong>and</strong> cut the scallions into quarters. Take a teaspoon <strong>of</strong> lemon juice <strong>and</strong> emulsify the essential<br />
oils in it <strong>and</strong> mix in the rest <strong>of</strong> the ingredients. Let the prawns soak in the marinade <strong>and</strong> keep<br />
it in the fridge for 1 h. Then separate the prawns from the marinade; filter the marinade <strong>and</strong> keep<br />
the parts separately. Fry the prawns inside <strong>of</strong> the liquid parts <strong>of</strong> the marinade, then add the rest.
878 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Stir it well for another minute, season with salt, pepper, <strong>and</strong> BERGAMOT vine <strong>and</strong> let it simmer<br />
slowly. Nice to serve with baguette or the crispy wild rice chapatis <strong>and</strong> vegetables like green<br />
asparagus tips.<br />
DESSERT, CAKES, AND BAKED GOODS<br />
Apple Cake Rose<br />
This classic combination is an apples favorite destiny. Suited even for diabetics.<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 250 g spelt flour<br />
– 120 g finely sliced cold butter<br />
– 1 organic or free range egg<br />
– 1 tablespoon CAPRI essential oil seasoning no. 1<br />
– Salt<br />
– 50–100 mL warm water<br />
– 1000 g sweet ripe apples<br />
– Juice <strong>of</strong> a half lemon<br />
– 1 tablespoon organic rose water.<br />
For the topping:<br />
– 250 ml cream<br />
– 1 egg yolk <strong>of</strong> an organic or free range egg<br />
– 5–7 drops MAGIC ORANGE pure seasoning intermixture<br />
– 1 tablespoon organic rose water<br />
– 50 g sliced almonds to garnish the top <strong>of</strong> the cake.<br />
Preparation: Sift the flour, butter, egg, warm water, <strong>and</strong> the CAPRI seasoning no. 1 into a large<br />
mixing bowl. Mix everything together until combined; then store the cake mixture in the fridge for<br />
a half hour. In the meanwhile, peel <strong>and</strong> core the apples, slice them into wedges, <strong>and</strong> slice the<br />
wedges thinly. Combine lemon juice with rose water <strong>and</strong> splash it over the apples. For the topping,<br />
beat the egg yolk with the cream <strong>and</strong> the pure essential oil intermixture MAGIC ORANGE. Then<br />
pour the cake mixture into the prepared pan, smooth the surface, then make a shallow hollow in a<br />
ring around the edge <strong>of</strong> the mixture. Arrange the apple slices on top <strong>of</strong> the cake mixture. Pour the<br />
topping carefully above the apple slices <strong>and</strong> garnish the sliced almonds above. Cover the cake with<br />
aluminum foil. Bake for 30–40 min, until firm <strong>and</strong> the mixture comes away from the side <strong>of</strong> the<br />
pan. Lower the heat, remove the foil, <strong>and</strong> bake it for another 5 min. Serve warm.<br />
Chocolate Fruits <strong>and</strong> Leaves<br />
A delicious way to consume your favorite fruits, dried fruits, nuts, or even leaves like rose leaves.<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 250 g organic chocolate couverture (bitter chocolate)<br />
– 5 drops MAGIC ORANGE or BERGAMOT–GRAND MANIER or CAPRI intermixture –<br />
or 2–3 drops PEPPERMINT, LAVENDER, or GINGER pure basic essential oil, depending<br />
on your taste—spicy, mint, or fruity.
Aroma-Vital Cuisine 879<br />
Courtesy <strong>of</strong> Ulla Mayer-Raichle.<br />
Preparation: Warm up the chocolate couverture until you have a creamy consistency. Stir in<br />
your choice <strong>of</strong> basic essential oils or intermixture. Dive in the fruits, <strong>and</strong> let them dry. Serve<br />
chilled.<br />
Homemade Fresh Berry Jelly<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 500 gm mixed berries<br />
– (blue berries; rasp berries; red, white, <strong>and</strong> black currant; black berries; strawberries, cranberries,<br />
cherries)<br />
– 100 mL water<br />
– 1 tablespoon agar or 2 tablespoons kuzu or sago (binding agent)<br />
– 1–2 tablespoons cold water<br />
– 12 drops MAGIC ORANGE intermixture<br />
– 3 tablespoons maple syrup.<br />
Preparation: Take the clean fruits <strong>and</strong> boil them in the water. Stir the binding agent into the small<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> cold water, then add it to the warm fruits <strong>and</strong> let them boil for another 3–5 min before<br />
you lower the heat, then leave the mixture to cool. Emulsify the essential oils intermixture with the<br />
maple honey; then stir it into the jelly. Serve cool with fresh berries or a spoonful <strong>of</strong> whipped cream<br />
with mint leaves.<br />
Rose Semifreddo<br />
Romantic <strong>and</strong> delicate aromatic dessert.<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 150 g creme fraiche<br />
– 75 g low fat quark<br />
– 100 mL acacia honey<br />
– 1 tablespoon rose water<br />
– Rose leaves from 2 roses (organic farming)<br />
– 2 tablespoons cognac
880 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
– Nonalcoholic alternative—1 drop pure MAGIC ORANGE intermixture in 2 tablespoons<br />
maple syrup<br />
– 150 mL whipped cream<br />
– 1 drop <strong>of</strong> pure MAGIC ORANGE intermixture.<br />
Preparation: Place the creme fraiche <strong>and</strong> the quark in a bowl <strong>and</strong> cream together. Keep some rose<br />
leaves for decoration aside, process the rest <strong>of</strong> the leaves in a food processor until smooth, then<br />
transfer them into the bowl; add the acacia honey <strong>and</strong> stir to mix. Whisk in the rose water <strong>and</strong><br />
either the cognac or the MAGIC ORANGE maple syrup. Fold in the whipped cream <strong>and</strong> the pure<br />
MAGIC ORANGE intermixture gently, being careful not to over mix. Pour the mixture into some<br />
small plastic containers, cover <strong>and</strong> freeze until the ice is firm. Transfer the ice to the refrigerator<br />
about 20 min before serving to allow it to s<strong>of</strong>ten a little. Serve in scoops decorated with rose leaves<br />
<strong>and</strong> berries.<br />
Sweet Florentine<br />
Sweet almond munchies.<br />
Ingredients:<br />
– 500 g butter<br />
– 200 g sugar<br />
– 2 packages organic bourbon vanilla sugar<br />
– 250 mL cream<br />
– 300 g sliced almonds<br />
– 30 g spelt or wheat grain<br />
– 15–20 drops MAGIC ORANGE or CAPRI intermixture emulsified in 1 tablespoon maple<br />
treacle<br />
– 100 g chocolate couverture with 5–8 drops CAPRI or MAGIC ORANGE intermixture.<br />
Preparation: Caramelize the sugar, then stir in the bourbon vanilla, butter until the sugar has been<br />
melted, then stir in almonds <strong>and</strong> flour. Preheat the oven to 180°C, then spoon the mixture on a<br />
baking tray <strong>and</strong> bake for 10 min. Do not worry, it is in their nature to melt. To serve, just cut them<br />
into diamonds after cooling down <strong>and</strong> remove them from the pan. Dive them halfway into the<br />
chocolate couverture only (the lower smooth side) then let them dry. Serve chilled or iced.<br />
RÉSUMÉ<br />
Aroma-vital cuisine is an aspect <strong>of</strong> aroma culture <strong>and</strong> therefore an art <strong>and</strong> cultivation <strong>of</strong> using the<br />
senses especially taste <strong>and</strong> smell.
19<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> Used in<br />
Veterinary Medicine<br />
K. Hüsnü Can Başer <strong>and</strong> Chlodwig Franz<br />
CONTENTS<br />
19.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 881<br />
19.2 <strong>Oils</strong> Attracting Animals .................................................................................................. 883<br />
19.3 <strong>Oils</strong> Repelling Animals .................................................................................................. 883<br />
19.4 <strong>Oils</strong> against Pests ............................................................................................................ 884<br />
19.4.1 Insecticidal, Pest Repellent, <strong>and</strong> Antiparasitic <strong>Oils</strong> .......................................... 884<br />
19.4.2 Fleas <strong>and</strong> Ticks .................................................................................................. 884<br />
19.4.3 Mosquitoes ......................................................................................................... 884<br />
19.4.4 Moths ................................................................................................................. 885<br />
19.4.5 Aphids, Caterpillars, <strong>and</strong> Whiteflies ................................................................. 885<br />
19.4.5.1 Garlic Oil ........................................................................................... 885<br />
19.4.6 Ear Mites ........................................................................................................... 885<br />
19.4.7 Antiparasitic ...................................................................................................... 885<br />
19.5 <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> used in Animal Feed ................................................................................ 886<br />
19.5.1 Ruminants .......................................................................................................... 886<br />
19.5.2 Poultry ............................................................................................................... 887<br />
19.5.2.1 Studies with CRINA Poultry ............................................................. 887<br />
19.5.2.2 Studies with Herbromix ..................................................................... 888<br />
19.5.3 Pigs .................................................................................................................... 889<br />
19.6 <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> used in Treating Diseases in Animals ..................................................... 890<br />
References .................................................................................................................................. 891<br />
19.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils are volatile constituents <strong>of</strong> aromatic plants. These liquid oils are generally complex<br />
mixtures <strong>of</strong> terpenoid <strong>and</strong>/or nonterpenoid compounds. Mono-, sesqui-, <strong>and</strong> sometimes diterpenoids,<br />
phenylpropanoids, fatty acids <strong>and</strong> their fragments, benzenoids, <strong>and</strong> so on may occur in various<br />
essential oils (Baser <strong>and</strong> Demirci, 2007).<br />
Except for citrus oils obtained by cold pressing, all other essential oils are obtained by distillation.<br />
Products obtained by solvent extraction or supercritical fluid extraction are not technically<br />
considered as essential oils (Baser, 1995).<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils are used in perfumery, food flavoring, pharmaceuticals, <strong>and</strong> sources <strong>of</strong><br />
aromachemicals.<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils exhibit a wide range <strong>of</strong> biological activities <strong>and</strong> 31 essential oils have monographs<br />
in the latest edition <strong>of</strong> the European Pharmacopoeia (Table 19.1).<br />
881
882 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 19.1<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> Oil Monographs in the European Pharmacopoeia (6.5 Edition, 2009)<br />
English Name Latin Name Plant Name<br />
Anise oil Anisi aetheroleum Pimpinella anisum L. fruits<br />
Bitter-fennel fruit oil Foeniculi amari fructus aetheroleum Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var.<br />
vulgare<br />
Bitter-fennel herb oil Foeniculi amari herba aetheroleum Foeniculum vulgare Miller subsp. vulgare var.<br />
vulgare<br />
Caraway oil Carvi aetheroleum Carum carvi L.<br />
Cassia oil Cinnamomi cassiae aetheroleum Cinnamomum cassia Blume (Cinnamomum<br />
aromaticum Nees)<br />
Cinnamon bark oil, Ceylon Cinnamomi zeylanici corticis aetheroleum Cinnamomum zeylanicum Nees<br />
Cinnamon leaf oil, Ceylon Cinnamomi zeylanici folium aetheroleum Cinnamomum verum J.S. Presl.<br />
Citronella oil Citronellae aetheroleum Cymbopogon winterianus Jowitt<br />
Clarysage oil Salviae sclareae aetheroleum Salvia sclarea L.<br />
Clove oil Caryophylli aetheroleum Syzigium aromaticum (L.) Merill et L.M.<br />
Perry (Eugenia caryophyllus C.S. Spreng.<br />
Bull. et Harr<br />
Cori<strong>and</strong>er oil Cori<strong>and</strong>ri aetheroleum Cori<strong>and</strong>rum sativum L.<br />
Dwarf pine oil Pini pumilionis aetheroleum Pinus mugo Turra.<br />
Eucalyptus oil Eucalypti aetheroleum Eucalyptus globulus Labill.<br />
Juniper oil Juniperi aetheroleum Juniperus communis L. meyvesi<br />
Lavender oil Lav<strong>and</strong>ulae aetheroleum Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia P. Mill. (Lav<strong>and</strong>ula<br />
<strong>of</strong>fi cinalis Chaix.)<br />
Lemon oil Limonis aetheroleum Citrus limon (L.) Burman fil.<br />
M<strong>and</strong>arin oil Citri reticulatae aetheroleum Citrus reticulata Blanco<br />
Matricaria oil Matricariae aetheroleum Matricaria recutita L. (Chamomilla recutita<br />
(L.) Ranschert)<br />
Mint oil, partly<br />
dementholized<br />
Neroli oil (formerly<br />
bitter-orange flower oil)<br />
Menthae arvensis aetheroleum<br />
partim mentholi privum<br />
Neroli aetheroleum (formerly Aurantii<br />
amari fl oris aetheroleum)<br />
Mentha canadensis L. (Mentha arvensis<br />
L. var. glabrata (Benth.) Fern, Mentha<br />
arvensis L. var. piperascens Malinv. ex<br />
Holmes) Japanese mint<br />
Citrus aurantium L. subsp. aurantium (Citrus<br />
aurantium L. subsp. amara Engl.)<br />
Nutmeg oil Myristicae fragrantis aetheroleum Myristica fragrans Houtt.<br />
Peppermint oil Menthae piperitae aetheroleum Mentha × piperita L.<br />
Pine silvestris oil Pini silvestris aetheroleum Pinus silvestris L.<br />
Rosemary oil Rosmarini aetheroleum Rosmarinus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L.<br />
Spanish sage oil Salviae lav<strong>and</strong>ulifoliae aetheroleum Salvia lav<strong>and</strong>ulifolia Vahl.<br />
Spike lavender oil Spicae aetheroleum Lav<strong>and</strong>ula latifolia Medik.<br />
Star anise oil Anisi stellati aetheroleum Illicium verum Hooker fil.<br />
Sweet orange oil Aurantii dulcis aetheroleum Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck (Citrus aurantium<br />
L. var. dulcis L.)<br />
Tea tree oil Melaleucae aetheroleum Melaleuca alternifolia (Maiden et Betch)<br />
Cheel, Melaleuca linariifolia Smith,<br />
Melaleuca dissitifl ora F. Mueller <strong>and</strong> other<br />
species<br />
Thyme oil Thymi aetheroleum Thymus vulgaris L., T. zygis L.<br />
Turpentine oil, Pinus<br />
pinaster type<br />
Terebinthini aetheroleum ab pinum<br />
pinastrum<br />
Pinus pinaster Aiton.<br />
(Maritime pine)
<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> Used in Veterinary Medicine 883<br />
Antimicrobial activities <strong>of</strong> many essential oils are well documented (Bakkali et al., 2008). Such<br />
oils may be used singly or in combination with one or more oils. For the sake <strong>of</strong> synergism this may<br />
be necessary.<br />
Although many are generally regarded as safe (GRAS), essential oils are generally not recommended<br />
for internal use. However, their much diluted forms (e.g., hydrosols) obtained during oil<br />
distillation as a by-product may be taken orally.<br />
Topical applications <strong>of</strong> some essential oils (e.g., oregano <strong>and</strong> lavender) in wounds <strong>and</strong> burns<br />
bring about fast recovery without leaving any sign <strong>of</strong> cicatrix. By inhalation, several essential oils<br />
act as a mood changer <strong>and</strong> have effect especially on respiratory conditions.<br />
Several essential oils (e.g., citronella oil) have been used as pest repellents or as insecticides <strong>and</strong><br />
such uses are frequently encountered in veterinary applications.<br />
In recent years, especially after the ban on the use <strong>of</strong> antibiotics in animal feed in the European<br />
Union since January 2006, essential oils have emerged as a potential alternative to antibiotics in<br />
animal feed.<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils used in veterinary medicine may be classified as follows:<br />
1. <strong>Oils</strong> attracting animals<br />
2. <strong>Oils</strong> repelling animals<br />
3. Insecticidal, pest repellent, <strong>and</strong> antiparasitic oils<br />
4. <strong>Oils</strong> used in animal feed<br />
5. <strong>Oils</strong> used in treating diseases in animals.<br />
19.2 OILS ATTRACTING ANIMALS<br />
Valeriana oils (<strong>and</strong> valerianic <strong>and</strong> isovalerianic acids) <strong>and</strong> nepeta oils (<strong>and</strong> nepetalactones) are wellknown<br />
feline-attractant oils. Their odor attracts male cats.<br />
Douglas fir oil <strong>and</strong> its monoterpenes have been claimed to attract deer <strong>and</strong> wild boar (Buchbauer<br />
et al., 1994).<br />
Dogs are normally drawn to floral oils <strong>and</strong> usually choose to take these by inhalation only.<br />
Monoter pene-rich oils are usually too strong for dogs, with the exception <strong>of</strong> bergamot, Citrus bergamia.<br />
Cats also usually select only floral oils for inhalation. Cats do not have metabolic mechanism to<br />
break down essential oils due to the lack <strong>of</strong> enzyme glucuronidase. Therefore, they should not be<br />
taken by mouth <strong>and</strong> should not be generally applied topically (http://www.ingraham.co.uk).<br />
19.3 OILS REPELLING ANIMALS<br />
Peppermint oil (Mentha piperita) repels mice. It can be applied under the sink in the kitchen or applied<br />
in staples to prevent mice annoying horses <strong>and</strong> livestock. A few drops <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil in a bucket <strong>of</strong><br />
water used to scrub out a stall <strong>and</strong> sprinkling a few drops around the perimeter <strong>and</strong> directly on straw<br />
or bedding is said to eliminate or severely curtail the habitation <strong>of</strong> mice (Anonymous, 2001).<br />
A patent (United States Patent 4961929) claims that a mixture <strong>of</strong> methyl salicylate, birch oil,<br />
wintergreen oil, eucalyptus oil, pine oil, <strong>and</strong> pine-needle oil repels dogs.<br />
Another patent (United States Patent 4735803) claims the same using lemon oil <strong>and</strong> a-terpinyl<br />
methyl ether.<br />
Another similar formulation (United States Patent 4847292) claims that a mixture <strong>of</strong> citronellyl<br />
nitrile, citronellol, a-terpinyl methyl ether, <strong>and</strong> lemon oil repels dogs.<br />
A mixture <strong>of</strong> black pepper <strong>and</strong> capsicum oils <strong>and</strong> the oleoresin <strong>of</strong> rosemary is claimed to repel<br />
animals (United States Patent 6159474).<br />
Citronella oil repels cats <strong>and</strong> dogs (Moschetti, 2003).<br />
Repellents alleged to repel cats include allyl isothiocyanate (oil <strong>of</strong> mustard), amyl acetate, anethole,<br />
capsaicin, cinnamaldehyde, citral, citronella, citrus oil, eucalyptus oil, geranium oil, lavender
884 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
oil, lemongrass oil, menthol, methyl nonyl ketone, methyl salicylate, naphthalene, nicotine,<br />
paradichlorobenzene, <strong>and</strong> thymol. Oil <strong>of</strong> mustard, cinnamaldehyde, <strong>and</strong> methyl nonyl ketone are<br />
said to be the most potent.<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils comprised <strong>of</strong> 10 g/L solutions <strong>of</strong> cedarwood, cinnamon, sage, juniper berry, lavender,<br />
<strong>and</strong> rosemary, each were potent snake irritants. Brown tree snakes exposed to a 2-s burst <strong>of</strong><br />
aerosol <strong>of</strong> these oils exhibited prolonged, violent undirected locomotory behavior. In contrast, exposure<br />
to a 10 g L -1 concentration <strong>of</strong> ginger oil aerosol caused snakes to locomote, but in a deliberate,<br />
directed manner. The 10 g/L solutions delivered as aerosols <strong>of</strong> m-anisaldehyde, trans-anethole,<br />
1,8- cineole, cinnamaldehyde, citral, ethyl phenylacetate, eugenol, geranyl acetate, or methyl salicylate<br />
acted as potent irritants for brown tree snakes (Boiga irregularis) (Clark <strong>and</strong> Shivik, 2002).<br />
19.4 OILS AGAINST PESTS<br />
19.4.1 INSECTICIDAL, PEST REPELLENT, AND ANTIPARASITIC OILS<br />
The essential oil <strong>of</strong> bergamot (Citrus bergamia), anise (Pimpinella anisum), sage (Salvia <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis),<br />
tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia), geranium (Pelargonium sp.), peppermint (Mentha piperita), thyme<br />
(Thymus vulgaris), hyssop (Hyssopus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis), rosemary (Rosmarinus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis), <strong>and</strong> white clover<br />
(Trifolium repens) can be used to control certain pests on plants. They have been shown to<br />
reduce the number <strong>of</strong> eggs laid <strong>and</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> feeding damage by certain insects, particularly<br />
lepidopteran caterpillars. Sprays made from Tansy (Tanacetum vulgare) have demonstrated a repellent<br />
effect on imported cabbageworm on cabbage, reducing the number <strong>of</strong> eggs laid on the plants.<br />
Teas made from wormwood (Artemisia absinthium) or nasturtiums (Nasturtium spp.) are reputed to<br />
repel aphids from fruit trees, <strong>and</strong> sprays made from ground or blended catnip (Nepeta cataria),<br />
chives (Allium schoenoprasum), feverfew (Tanacetum parthenium), marigolds (Calendula, Tagetes,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Chrysanthemum spp.), or rue (Ruta graveolens) have also been used by gardeners against pests<br />
that feed on leaves (Moschetti, 2003).<br />
19.4.2 FLEAS AND TICKS<br />
Dogs, cats, <strong>and</strong> horses are plagued by fleas <strong>and</strong> ticks. One to two drops <strong>of</strong> citronella or lemongrass<br />
oils added to the shampoo will repel these pests. Alternatively, 4–5 drops <strong>of</strong> cedarwood oil <strong>and</strong> pine<br />
oil is added to a bowl <strong>of</strong> warm water <strong>and</strong> a bristle hair brush is soaked with this solution to brush the<br />
pet down with it. Eggs <strong>and</strong> parasites gathered in the brush are rinsed out. This is repeated several<br />
times. This solution can be used similarly for livestock after adding citronella <strong>and</strong> lemon grass oils<br />
to this mixture.<br />
Flea collar can be prepared by a mixture <strong>of</strong> cedarwood (Juniperus virginiana), lavender<br />
(Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia), citronella (Cymbopogon winterianus (Java)), thyme oils, <strong>and</strong> 4–5 garlic<br />
(Allium sativum) capsules. This mixture is thinned with a teaspoonful <strong>of</strong> ethanol <strong>and</strong> soaked with a<br />
collar or a cotton scarf. This is good for 30 days (Anonymous, 2001).<br />
Ticks can be removed by applying 1 drop <strong>of</strong> cinnamon or peppermint oil on Q-tip by swabbing<br />
on it.<br />
Carvacrol-rich oil (64%) <strong>of</strong> Origanum onites <strong>and</strong> carvacrol was found to be effective against the<br />
tick Rhipicephalus turanicus. Pure carvacrol killed all the ticks following 6 h <strong>of</strong> exposure, while<br />
25% <strong>and</strong> higher concentrations <strong>of</strong> the oil were effective in killing the ticks by the 24-h posttreatment<br />
(Coskun et al., 2008).<br />
19.4.3 MOSQUITOES<br />
Catnip oil (Nepeta cataria) containing nepetalactones can be used effectively as a mosquito repellent.<br />
It is said to be 10 times more effective than DEET (Moschetti, 2003). Juniperus communis berry oil
<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> Used in Veterinary Medicine 885<br />
is a very good mosquito repellent. Ocimum volatile oils including camphor, 1,8-cineole, methyl<br />
eugenol, limonene, myrcene, <strong>and</strong> thymol strongly repelled mosquitoes (Regnault-Roger, 1997).<br />
Citronella oil repels mosquitoes, biting insects, <strong>and</strong> fleas.<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils <strong>of</strong> Zingiber <strong>of</strong>fi cinale <strong>and</strong> Rosmarinus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis were found to be ovicidal <strong>and</strong><br />
repellent, respectively, toward three mosquito species (Prajapati et al., 2005). Root oil <strong>of</strong> Angelica<br />
sinensis <strong>and</strong> ligustilide was found to be mosquito repellent (Wedge et al., 2009).<br />
19.4.4 MOTHS<br />
Cedarwood oil is used in mothpro<strong>of</strong>ing. A large number <strong>of</strong> patents have been assigned to the preservation<br />
<strong>of</strong> cloths from moths <strong>and</strong> beetles: Application <strong>of</strong> a solution containing clove (Syzigum<br />
aromaticum) essential oil on woolen cloth; filter paper containing Juniperus rigida oil, <strong>and</strong> tablets<br />
<strong>of</strong> p-dichlorobenzene mixed with essential oils to be placed in wardrobe.<br />
19.4.5 APHIDS, CATERPILLARS, AND WHITEFLIES<br />
19.4.5.1 Garlic Oil<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils effective in insect pest control (Regnault-Roger, 1997).<br />
19.4.6 EAR MITES<br />
Peppermint oil is applied to a Q-tip <strong>and</strong> swabbed inside <strong>of</strong> the ear.<br />
19.4.7 ANTIPARASITIC<br />
A patent (United States Patent 6800294) on an antiparasitic formulation comprising eucalyptus oil<br />
(Eucalyptus globulus), cajeput oil (Melaleuca cajeputi), lemongrass oil, clove bud oil (Syzigium<br />
aromaticum), peppermint oil (Mentha piperita), piperonyl, <strong>and</strong> piperonyl butoxide. The formulation<br />
can be used for treating an animal body, in the manufacture <strong>of</strong> a medicament for treating ectoparasitic<br />
infestation <strong>of</strong> an animal, or for repelling parasites.<br />
Two essential oils derived from Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia <strong>and</strong> Lav<strong>and</strong>ula ¥ intermedia were investigated<br />
for any antiparasitic activity against the human protozoal pathogens Giardia duodenalis <strong>and</strong><br />
Trichomonas vaginalis <strong>and</strong> the fish pathogen Hexamita infl ata, all <strong>of</strong> which have significant infection<br />
<strong>and</strong> economic impacts. The study has demonstrated that low (£1%) concentrations <strong>of</strong> Lav<strong>and</strong>ula<br />
angustifolia <strong>and</strong> Lav<strong>and</strong>ula × intermedia oil can completely eliminate Trichomonas vaginalis,<br />
Giardia duodenalis, <strong>and</strong> Hexamita infl ata in vitro. At 0.1% concentration, Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia<br />
oil was found to be slightly more effective than Lav<strong>and</strong>ula × intermedia oil against Giardia duodenalis<br />
<strong>and</strong> Hexamita infl ata (Moon et al., 2006).<br />
The antiparasitic properties <strong>of</strong> essential oils from Artemisia absinthium, Artemisia annua, <strong>and</strong><br />
Artemisia scoparia were tested on intestinal parasites, Hymenolepis nana, Lambli intestinalis,<br />
Syphacia obvelata, <strong>and</strong> Trichocephalus muris [Trichuris muris]. Infested white mice were injected<br />
with 0.01 ml/g <strong>of</strong> the essential oils (6%) twice a day for 3 days. The effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the essential oils<br />
was observed in 70–90% <strong>of</strong> the tested animals (Chobanov et al., 2004).<br />
Parasites, such as head lice <strong>and</strong> scabies, as well as internal parasites, are repelled by oregano oil<br />
(86% carvacrol). The oil can be added to soaps, shampoos, <strong>and</strong> diluted in olive oil for topical applications.<br />
By taking a few drops daily under the tongue, one can gain protection from waterborne<br />
parasites, such as Cryptosporidium <strong>and</strong> Giardia. Internal dosages also are effective in killing parasites<br />
in the body (http://curingherbs.com/wild_oregano_oil.htm) (Foster, 2002).<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils from Pinus halepensis, Pinus brutia, Pinus pinaster, Pinus pinea, <strong>and</strong> Cedrus<br />
atlantica were tested for molluscicidal activity against Bulinus truncatus. The oil from Cedrus
886 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
atlantica was found the most active (LC 50 = 0.47 ppm). Among their main constituents, a-pinene,<br />
b-pinene, <strong>and</strong> myrcene exhibited potent molluscicidal activity (LC 50 = 0.49; 0.54, <strong>and</strong> 0.56 ppm,<br />
respectively). These findings have important application <strong>of</strong> natural products in combating schistosomiasis<br />
(Lahlou, 2003).<br />
Origanum essential oils have exhibited differential degrees <strong>of</strong> protection against myxosporean<br />
infections in gilthead <strong>and</strong> sharpsnout sea bream tested in l<strong>and</strong>-based experimental facilities<br />
(Athanassopoulou et al., 2004a, 2004b).<br />
19.5 ESSENTIAL OILS USED IN ANIMAL FEED<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils can be used in feed as appetite stimulant, stimulant <strong>of</strong> saliva production, gastric <strong>and</strong><br />
pancreatic juices production enhancer, <strong>and</strong> antimicrobial <strong>and</strong> antioxidant to improve broiler performance.<br />
Antimicrobial effects <strong>of</strong> essential oils are well documented. <strong>Essential</strong> oils due to their potent<br />
nature should be used as low as possible levels in animal nutrition. Otherwise, they can lead to feed<br />
intake reduction, gastrointestinal (GIT) micr<strong>of</strong>lora disturbance, or accumulation in animal tissues<br />
<strong>and</strong> products. Odor <strong>and</strong> taste <strong>of</strong> essential oils may contribute to feed refusal; however, encapsulation<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils could solve this problem (Gauthier, 2005).<br />
Generally, Gram-positive bacteria are considered more sensitive to essential oils than Gramnegative<br />
bacteria because <strong>of</strong> their less complex membrane structure (Lis-Balchin, 2003).<br />
Carvacrol, the main constituent <strong>of</strong> oregano oils, is a powerful antimicrobial agent (Baser, 2008).<br />
It asserts its effect through the biological membranes <strong>of</strong> bacteria. It acts through inducing a sharp<br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> the intercellular ATP pool through the reduction <strong>of</strong> ATP synthesis <strong>and</strong> increased hydrolysis.<br />
Reduction <strong>of</strong> the membrane potential (transmembrane electrical potential), which is the driving<br />
force <strong>of</strong> ATP synthesis, makes the membrane more permeable to protons. A high level <strong>of</strong><br />
carvacrol (1 mM) decreases the internal pH <strong>of</strong> bacteria from 7.1 to 5.8 related to ion gradients across<br />
the cell membrane. 1 mM <strong>of</strong> carvacrol reduces the internal potassium (K) level <strong>of</strong> bacteria from<br />
12 mmol/mg <strong>of</strong> cell protein to 0.99 mmol/mg in 5 min. K plays a role in the activation <strong>of</strong> cytoplasmic<br />
enzymes <strong>and</strong> in maintaining osmotic pressure <strong>and</strong> in the regulation <strong>of</strong> cytoplasmic pH. K efflux<br />
is a solid indication <strong>of</strong> membrane damage (Ultee et al., 1999).<br />
It has been shown that the mode <strong>of</strong> action <strong>of</strong> oregano oils is related to an impairment <strong>of</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong><br />
enzyme systems, mainly involved in the production <strong>of</strong> energy <strong>and</strong> the synthesis <strong>of</strong> structural components.<br />
Leakage <strong>of</strong> ions, ATP, <strong>and</strong> amino acids also explain the mode <strong>of</strong> action. Potassium <strong>and</strong> phosphate<br />
ion concentrations are affected at levels below the MIC concentration (Lambert et al., 2001).<br />
19.5.1 RUMINANTS<br />
A recent review compiled information on botanicals including essential oils used in ruminant health<br />
<strong>and</strong> productivity (Rochfort et al., 2008). Unfortunately, there are few reports on the effects <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oils <strong>and</strong> natural aromachemicals on ruminants. It was demonstrated that the consumption <strong>of</strong><br />
terpene volatiles such as camphor <strong>and</strong> a-pinene in “tarbush” (Flourencia cernua) effected feed<br />
intake in sheep (Estell et al., 1998). In vitro <strong>and</strong> in vivo antimicrobial activities <strong>of</strong> essential oils have<br />
been demonstrated in ruminants (Cardozo, 2005; Elgayyar et al., 2001; Moreira et al., 2005; Wallace<br />
et al., 2002). Synergistic antinematodal effects <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> lipids were demonstrated<br />
(Ghisalberti, 2002). Other nematocidal volatiles reported are as follows: benzyl isothiocyanate<br />
(goat), ascaridole (goat <strong>and</strong> sheep) (Githiori et al., 2006; Ghisalberti, 2002), geraniol, eugenol<br />
(Githiori et al., 2006; Chitwood, 2002), <strong>and</strong> menthol, 1,8-cineole (Chitwood, 2002).<br />
Methylsalicylate, the main component <strong>of</strong> the essential oil <strong>of</strong> Gaultheria procumbens<br />
(Wintergreen), is topically used as emulsion in cattle, horses, sheep, goats, <strong>and</strong> poultry in the treatment<br />
<strong>of</strong> muscular <strong>and</strong> articular pain. The recommended dose is 600 mg/kg bw twice a day. The<br />
duration <strong>of</strong> treatment is usually less than 1 week (EMEA, 1999). It is included in Annex II <strong>of</strong>
<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> Used in Veterinary Medicine 887<br />
Council Regulation (EEC) N. 2377/90 as a substance that does not need an MRL level. Gaultheria<br />
procumbens should not to be used as flavoring in pet food since salicylates are toxic to dogs <strong>and</strong><br />
cats. As cats metabolize salicylates much more slowly than other species, they are more likely to be<br />
overdosed. Use <strong>of</strong> methylsalicylate in combination with anticoagulants such as warfarin can result<br />
in adverse interactions <strong>and</strong> bleedings (Chow et al., 1989; Ramanathan, 1995; Tam et al., 1995; Yip<br />
et al., 1990).<br />
The essential oil <strong>of</strong> Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia (Lav<strong>and</strong>ulae aetheroleum) is used in veterinary<br />
medicinal products for topical use together with other plant extracts or essential oils for antiseptic<br />
<strong>and</strong> healing purposes. The product is used in horses, cattle, sheep, goats, rabbits, <strong>and</strong> poultry. It is<br />
included in Annex II <strong>of</strong> Council Regulation (EEC) N. 2377/90 as a substance that does not need an<br />
MRL level (EMEA, 1999; Franz et al., 2005).<br />
The outcomes <strong>of</strong> in vitro studies investigating the potential <strong>of</strong> Pimpinella anisum essential oil as<br />
a feed additive to improve nutrient use in ruminants are inconclusive, <strong>and</strong> more <strong>and</strong> larger preferably<br />
in vivo studies are necessary for evaluation <strong>of</strong> efficacy (Franz et al., 2005).<br />
Carvacrol, carvone, cinnamaldehyde, cinnamon oil, clove bud oil, eugenol, <strong>and</strong> oregano oil have<br />
resulted in a 30–50% reduction in ammonia N concentration in diluted ruminal fluid with a 50:50<br />
forage concentrate diet during the 24-h incubation (Busquet et al., 2006).<br />
Carvacrol has been suggested as a potential modulator <strong>of</strong> ruminal fermentation (Garcia et al.,<br />
2007).<br />
19.5.2 POULTRY<br />
19.5.2.1 Studies with CRINA Poultry<br />
Dietary addition <strong>of</strong> essential oils in a commercial blend (CRINA ® Poultry) showed a decreased<br />
Escherichia coli population in ileo-cecal digesta <strong>of</strong> broiler chickens. Furthermore, in high doses, a<br />
significant increase in certain digestive enzyme activities <strong>of</strong> the pancreas <strong>and</strong> intestine was observed<br />
in broiler chickens (Jang et al., 2007).<br />
In another study, CRINA Poultry was shown to control the colonization <strong>of</strong> the intestine <strong>of</strong> broilers<br />
with Clostridium perfringens <strong>and</strong> the stimulation <strong>of</strong> animal growth was put down to this development<br />
(Losa, 2001).<br />
Commercial essential oil blends CRINA Poultry <strong>and</strong> CRINA Alternate were tested in broilers<br />
infected with viable oocysts <strong>of</strong> mixed Eimeria spp. It was concluded that these essential oil blends<br />
may serve as an alternative to antibiotics <strong>and</strong>/or ionophores in mixed Eimeria infections in noncocci-vaccinated<br />
broilers, but no benefit <strong>of</strong> essential oil supplementation was observed for vaccinated<br />
broilers against coccidia (Oviedo-Rondon et al., 2006).<br />
19.5.2.1.1 Other Studies<br />
Supplementation <strong>of</strong> 200 ppm essential oil mixture (EOM) that included oregano, clove, <strong>and</strong> anise<br />
oils (no species name or composition given!) in broiler diets was said to significantly improve the<br />
daily live weight gain <strong>and</strong> feed conversion ratio (FCR) during a growing period <strong>of</strong> 5 weeks (Ertas<br />
et al., 2006). Similar results were obtained with 400 mg/kg anise oil (composition not known!)<br />
(Ciftci et al., 2005).<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 50 <strong>and</strong> 100 mg/kg <strong>of</strong> feed <strong>of</strong> oregano oil * were tested on broilers. No growth- promoting<br />
effect was observed. At 100 mg/kg <strong>of</strong> feed, antioxidant effect was detected on chicken tissues<br />
(Botsoglou et al., 2002a).<br />
Positive results were also reported for oregano oil added in poultry feed (Bassett, 2000).<br />
* Oregano essential oil was in the form <strong>of</strong> a powder called Orego-Stim. This product contains 5% oregano essential oil<br />
(Ecopharm Hellas, SA, Kilkis, Greece) <strong>and</strong> 95% natural feed grade inert carrier. The oil <strong>of</strong> Origanum vulgare subsp.<br />
hirtum used in this product contains 85% carvacrol + thymol.
888 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Antioxidant activities <strong>of</strong> rosemary <strong>and</strong> sage oils on lipid oxidation <strong>of</strong> broiler meat have been<br />
shown. Following dietary administration <strong>of</strong> rosemary <strong>and</strong> sage oils to the live birds, a significant<br />
inhibition <strong>of</strong> lipid peroxidation was reported in chicken meat stored for 9 days (Lopez-Bote<br />
et al., 1998). A dietary supplementation <strong>of</strong> oregano essential oil (300 mg/kg) showed a positive<br />
effect on the performance <strong>of</strong> broiler chickens experimentally infected with Eimeria tenella.<br />
Throughout the experimental period <strong>of</strong> 42 days, oregano essential oil exerted an anticoccidial effect<br />
against Eimeria tenella, which was, however, lower than that exhibited by lasalocid. Supplementation<br />
with dietary oregano oil to Eimeria tenella-infected chickens resulted in body weight gains <strong>and</strong> feed<br />
conversion ratios not differing from the noninfected group, but higher than those <strong>of</strong> the infected<br />
control group <strong>and</strong> lower than those <strong>of</strong> chickens treated with the anticoccidial lasalocid (Giannenas<br />
et al., 2003).<br />
Inclusion <strong>of</strong> oregano oil at 0.005% <strong>and</strong> 0.01% in chicken diets for 38 days resulted in a significant<br />
antioxidant effect in raw <strong>and</strong> cooked breast <strong>and</strong> thigh muscle stored up to 9 days in refrigerator<br />
(Botsoglou et al., 2002b).<br />
Oregano oil (55% carvacrol) exhibited a strong bactericidal effect against lactobacilli <strong>and</strong> following<br />
the oral administration <strong>of</strong> the oil MIC values <strong>of</strong> amicain, apramycin, <strong>and</strong> streptomycin<strong>and</strong><br />
neomyc against Escherichia coli strains increased (Horosova et al., 2006).<br />
An in vitro assay measuring the antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>of</strong> Coridothymus capitatus,<br />
Satureja montana, Thymus mastichina, Thymus zygis, <strong>and</strong> Origanum vulgare was carried out<br />
against poultry origin strains <strong>of</strong> Escherichia coli, Salmonella enteritidis, <strong>and</strong> Salmonella essen, <strong>and</strong><br />
pig origin strains <strong>of</strong> enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), Salmonella choleraesuis, <strong>and</strong><br />
Salmonella typhimurium. Origanum vulgare (MIC £ 1% v/v) oil showed the highest antimicrobial<br />
activity against the four strains <strong>of</strong> Salmonella. It was followed by Thymus zygis oil (MIC £ 2% v/v).<br />
Thymus mastichina oil inhibited all the microorganisms at the highest concentration, 4% (v/v).<br />
Monoterpenic phenols carvacrol <strong>and</strong> thymol showed higher inhibitory capacity than the monoterpenic<br />
alcohol linalool. The results confirmed potential application <strong>of</strong> such oils in the treatment <strong>and</strong><br />
prevention <strong>of</strong> poultry <strong>and</strong> pig diseases caused by salmonella (Penalver et al., 2005).<br />
In another study, groups <strong>of</strong> male, 1-day-old Lohmann broilers were given maize–soya bean meal<br />
diets, with oils extracted from thyme, mace, <strong>and</strong> caraway or cori<strong>and</strong>er, garlic, <strong>and</strong> onion (0, 20, 40,<br />
<strong>and</strong> 80 mg/kg) for 6 weeks. The average daily gain <strong>and</strong> FCR were not different between the broilers<br />
fed with the different oils; meat was not tainted with flavor or smell <strong>of</strong> the oils (Vogt <strong>and</strong> Rauch,<br />
1991).<br />
19.5.2.2 Studies with Herbromix<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils from oregano herb (Origanum onites), laurel leaf (Laurus nobilis), sage leaf (Salvia<br />
fruticosa), fennel fruit (Foeniculum vulgare), myrtle leaf (Myrtus communis), <strong>and</strong> citrus peel (rich<br />
in limonene) were mixed <strong>and</strong> formulated as feed additive after encapsulation. It is marketed in<br />
Turkey as poultry feed under the name Herbromix ® .<br />
The following three in vivo experiments with this product were recently accomplished.<br />
19.5.2.2.1 In Vivo Experiment 1<br />
In this study, 1250 sexed 1-day-old broiler chicks obtained from a commercial hatchery were r<strong>and</strong>omly<br />
divided into five treatment groups <strong>of</strong> 250 birds each (negative control, antibiotic, <strong>and</strong> essential<br />
oil combination (EOC) at three levels). Each treatment group was further subdivided into five<br />
replicates <strong>of</strong> 50 birds (25 males <strong>and</strong> 25 females) per replicate. Commercial EOC at three different<br />
levels (24, 48, <strong>and</strong> 72 mg) <strong>and</strong> antibiotic (10 mg avilamycin) per kg were added to the basal diet.<br />
There were significant effects <strong>of</strong> dietary treatments on body weight, feed intake (except at day 42),<br />
FCR, <strong>and</strong> carcass yield at 21 <strong>and</strong> 42 days. Body weights were significantly different between the<br />
treatments. Birds fed on diet containing 48 mg essential oil/kg being the highest <strong>and</strong> this treatment<br />
was followed by chicks fed on the diet containing 72 mg essential oil/kg, antibiotic, negative control,<br />
<strong>and</strong> 24 mg essential oil/kg at day 42.
<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> Used in Veterinary Medicine 889<br />
Supplementation with 48 mg EOC/kg to the broiler diet significantly improved the body weight<br />
gain, FCR, <strong>and</strong> carcass yield compared to other dietary treatments on 42 days <strong>of</strong> age. EOC may be<br />
considered as a potential growth promoter in the future <strong>of</strong> the new era, which agrees with producer<br />
needs for increased performance <strong>and</strong> today’s consumer dem<strong>and</strong>s for environment-friendly broiler<br />
production. The EOC can be used cost effectively when its cost is compared with antibiotics <strong>and</strong><br />
other commercially available products in the market.<br />
19.5.2.2.2 In Vivo Experiment 2<br />
In this study, 1250 sexed 1-day-old broiler chicks were r<strong>and</strong>omly divided into five treatment groups<br />
<strong>of</strong> 250 birds each (negative control, organic acid, probiotic, <strong>and</strong> EOC at two levels). Each treatment<br />
group was further subdivided into five replicates <strong>of</strong> 50 birds (25 males <strong>and</strong> 25 females) per replicate.<br />
The oils in the EOC were extracted from different herbs growing in Turkey. The organic acid at<br />
2.5 g/kg diet, the probiotic at 1 g/kg diet, <strong>and</strong> the EOC at 36 <strong>and</strong> 48 mg/kg diet were added to the<br />
basal diet.<br />
The results obtained from this study indicated that the inclusion <strong>of</strong> 48 mg EOC/kg broiler diet<br />
significantly improved the body weight gain, FCR, <strong>and</strong> carcass yield <strong>of</strong> broilers compared to organic<br />
acid <strong>and</strong> probiotic treatments after a growing period <strong>of</strong> 42 days. The EOC may be considered as a<br />
potential growth promoter like organic acids <strong>and</strong> probiotics for environment-friendly broiler<br />
production.<br />
19.5.2.2.3 In Vivo Experiment 3<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> the present study was to examine the effect <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>and</strong> breeder age on growth<br />
performance <strong>and</strong> some internal organs weight <strong>of</strong> broilers. A total <strong>of</strong> 1008 unsexed 1-day-old broiler<br />
chicks (Ross-308) originating from young (30 weeks) <strong>and</strong> older (80 weeks) breeder flocks were<br />
r<strong>and</strong>omly divided into three treatment groups <strong>of</strong> 336 birds each, consisting <strong>of</strong> control <strong>and</strong> two<br />
EOMs at a level <strong>of</strong> 24 <strong>and</strong> 48 mg/kg diet. There were no significant effects <strong>of</strong> dietary treatments on<br />
body weight gain <strong>of</strong> broilers at days 21 <strong>and</strong> 42.<br />
On the other h<strong>and</strong>, there were significant differences on the feed intake at days 21 <strong>and</strong> 42. The<br />
addition <strong>of</strong> 24 or 48 mg/kg EOM to the diet reduced significantly the feed intake compared to the<br />
control. The groups fed with the added EOM had significantly better FCR than the control at days<br />
21 <strong>and</strong> 42. Although, there was no significant effect <strong>of</strong> broiler breeder age on body weight gain at<br />
day 21, significant differences were observed on body weight gain at 42 days <strong>of</strong> age. Broilers originating<br />
from young breeder flock had significantly higher body weight gain than those originating<br />
from old breeder flock at 42 days <strong>of</strong> age. No difference was noticed for carcass yield, liver, pancreas,<br />
proventriculus, gizzard, <strong>and</strong> small intestine weight. Supplementation with EOM to the diet in both<br />
levels significantly decreased mortality at days 21 <strong>and</strong> 42.<br />
The results indicated that the Herbromix may be considered as a potential growth promoter.<br />
However, more trials are needed to determine the effect <strong>of</strong> essential oil supplementation to diet on<br />
the performance <strong>of</strong> broilers with regard to variable management conditions including different<br />
stress factors, essential oils <strong>and</strong> their optimal dietary inclusion levels, active substances <strong>of</strong> oils,<br />
dietary ingredients, <strong>and</strong> nutrient density (Cabuk et al., 2006a, 2006b; Alcicek et al., 2003, 2004;<br />
Bozkurt <strong>and</strong> Baser, 2002a, 2002b).<br />
19.5.3 PIGS<br />
CRINA ® Pigs was tested on pigs. The results for the first 21-day period showed that males grew<br />
faster, ate less, <strong>and</strong> exhibited superior FCR compared to females. Although female carcass weight<br />
was higher, males had a significantly lower carcass fat than females (Losa, 2001).<br />
The addition <strong>of</strong> fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) <strong>and</strong> caraway (Carum carvi) oils was not found<br />
beneficial for weaned piglets. In feed choice conditions, fennel oil caused feed aversion (Schoene<br />
et al., 2006).
890 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Oregano oil was found to be beneficial for piglets (Molnar <strong>and</strong> Bilkei, 2005).<br />
In a preliminary investigation, the effects <strong>of</strong> low-level dietary inclusion <strong>of</strong> rosemary, garlic, <strong>and</strong><br />
oregano oils on pig performance <strong>and</strong> pork quality were carried out. Unfortunately, no information<br />
on the species from which the oils were obtained <strong>and</strong> their composition existed in the paper. The<br />
pigs appeared to prefer the garlic-treated diet, <strong>and</strong> the feed intake <strong>and</strong> the average daily gain were<br />
significantly increased although no difference in the feed efficiency was observed. Carcass <strong>and</strong> meat<br />
quality attributes were unchanged, although a slight reduction <strong>of</strong> lipid oxidation was noted in<br />
oregano-fed pork. Since the composition <strong>of</strong> the oils is not clear, it is not possible to evaluate the<br />
results (Janz et al., 2007).<br />
A study revealed that the inclusion <strong>of</strong> essential oil <strong>of</strong> oregano in pigs’ diet significantly<br />
improved the average daily weight gain <strong>and</strong> FCR <strong>of</strong> the pigs. Pigs fed with the essential oils had<br />
higher carcass weight, dressing percentage, <strong>and</strong> carcass length than those fed with the basal <strong>and</strong><br />
antibiotic- supplemented diet. The pigs that received the essential oil supplementation had a significantly<br />
lower fat thickness. Also lean meat <strong>and</strong> ham portions from these pigs were significantly<br />
higher. Therefore, the use <strong>of</strong> Origanum essential oil as feed additive improves the growth <strong>of</strong> pigs<br />
<strong>and</strong> has greater positive effects on carcass composition than antibiotics (Onibala et al., 2001).<br />
Ropadiar ® , an essential oil <strong>of</strong> the oregano plant, was supplemented in the diet <strong>of</strong> weaning pigs<br />
as alternative for antimicrobial growth promoters (AMGPs), observing its efficacy on the performance<br />
<strong>of</strong> the piglets. Ropadiar liquid contains 10% oregano oil <strong>and</strong> has been designed to be added<br />
to water. Compared to the negative control (without AMGP), Ropadiar ® improved performance<br />
only during the first 14 days after weaning. Based on the results <strong>of</strong> this trial, it cannot be argued<br />
about the usefulness <strong>of</strong> Ropadiar ® as an alternative for AMGP in diets <strong>of</strong> weanling pigs. However,<br />
its addition in prestarter diets could improve performance <strong>of</strong> these animals (Krimpen <strong>and</strong><br />
Binnendijk, 2001).<br />
The objective <strong>of</strong> another trial was to ascertain the effect on nutrient digestibilities <strong>and</strong> N-balance,<br />
as well as on parameters <strong>of</strong> microbial activity in the gastrointestinal tract <strong>of</strong> weaned pigs after adding<br />
oregano oil to the feed. The apparent digestibility <strong>of</strong> crude nutrients (except fiber) <strong>and</strong> the<br />
N-balance <strong>of</strong> the weaned piglets in this study were not influenced by feeding piglets restrictively<br />
with this feed additive. By direct microbiological methods, no influence <strong>of</strong> the additive on the gut<br />
flora could be found (Moller, 2001).<br />
The inclusion <strong>of</strong> essential oil <strong>of</strong> spices in the pigs’ diet significantly improved the average daily<br />
weight gain <strong>and</strong> FCR <strong>of</strong> the pigs in Groups 3, 4, <strong>and</strong> 5, as compared to Groups 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 (P < 0.01).<br />
Furthermore, pigs fed with the essential oils had higher carcass weight (P < 0.01), dressing percentage<br />
(P < 0.01), <strong>and</strong> carcass length (P < 0.01) than those fed with the basal <strong>and</strong> antibiotic-supplemented<br />
diet. In Groups 3, 4, <strong>and</strong> 5, backfat thickness was significantly lower than those in Groups 1<br />
<strong>and</strong> 2. Moreover, lean meat <strong>and</strong> ham portions from pigs in Groups 3, 4, <strong>and</strong> 5 were significantly<br />
higher than those from pigs in Groups 1 <strong>and</strong> 2. In conclusion, the use <strong>of</strong> essential oils as feed additives<br />
improves the growth <strong>of</strong> pigs <strong>and</strong> has greater positive effects on carcass composition than antibiotics<br />
(Onibala et al., 2001).<br />
19.6 ESSENTIAL OILS USED IN TREATING DISEASES IN ANIMALS<br />
There is scarce scientific information on the use <strong>of</strong> essential oils in treating diseases in animals.<br />
Generally, the oils used in treating diseases in humans are also recommended for animals.<br />
Internet literature is abound with valid <strong>and</strong>/or suspicious information in this issue. We have tried<br />
to compile relevant information using the reachable resources. The information may not be concise<br />
or comprehensive but should be seen as an effort to combine the available information in a short<br />
period <strong>of</strong> time.<br />
The oil <strong>of</strong> Ocimum basilicum has been reported as an expectorant in animals. The combined oils<br />
<strong>of</strong> Ocimum micranthum <strong>and</strong> Chenopodium ambrosioides is claimed to treat stomach ache <strong>and</strong> colic<br />
in animals (http://www.ansci.cornell.edu/plants/medicinal/basil.html).
<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> Used in Veterinary Medicine 891<br />
Bad breath as a result <strong>of</strong> gum disease <strong>and</strong> bacterial buildup on the teeth <strong>of</strong> pets can be treated by<br />
brushing their teeth with a mixture <strong>of</strong> a couple <strong>of</strong> tablespoons <strong>of</strong> baking soda, 1 drop <strong>of</strong> clove oil <strong>and</strong><br />
1 drop <strong>of</strong> aniseed oil. Lavender, myrrh, <strong>and</strong> clove oils can also be directly applied to their gums.<br />
For wounds, abscesses, <strong>and</strong> burns, lavender <strong>and</strong> tea tree oils are used by topical application. Skin<br />
rashes can be treated with tea tree, lavender, <strong>and</strong> chamomile oils.<br />
Earache <strong>of</strong> pets can be healed by dripping a mixture <strong>of</strong> lavender, chamomile, <strong>and</strong> tea tree oils<br />
(1 drop each) dissolved in a teaspoonful <strong>of</strong> grapeseed or olive oil in the infected ears.<br />
Ho<strong>of</strong> rot in livestock can be treated with a hot compress made up <strong>of</strong> 10 drops <strong>of</strong> chamomile, 15 drops<br />
<strong>of</strong> thyme, <strong>and</strong> 5 drops <strong>of</strong> melissa oils diluted in about 100 ml <strong>of</strong> vegetable oil (e.g., grapeseed oil).<br />
Intestinal worms <strong>of</strong> horses can be expelled by applying 3–4 drops <strong>of</strong> thyme oil <strong>and</strong> tansy leaves<br />
to each feed. Melissa oil can be added to feed to increase milk production <strong>of</strong> both cows <strong>and</strong> goats<br />
(http://scentsnsensibility.com/newsletter/Apr0601.htm).<br />
Aromatic plants such as Pimpinella isaurica, Pimpinella aurea, <strong>and</strong> Pimpinella corymbosa are<br />
used as animal feed to increase milk secretion in Turkey (Tabanca et al., 2003).<br />
To calm horses, chamomile oil is added to their feed. Pneumonia in young elephants caused by<br />
Klebsiella is claimed to be healed by Lippia javanica oil. Rose <strong>and</strong> yarrow oils bring about emotional<br />
release in donkeys by licking them. Wounds in horses are treated with Achillea millefolium<br />
oil; sweet itch is treated with peppermint oil. Matricaria recutita <strong>and</strong> Achillea millefolium oils are<br />
used to heal the skin with inflammatory conditions (Anonymous, 2008).<br />
A study evaluated the effect <strong>of</strong> dietary oregano etheric oils as nonspecific immunostimulating<br />
agents in growth-retarded, low-weight growing-finishing pigs. A group <strong>of</strong> pigs were fed with commercial<br />
fattening diet supplemented with 3000 ppm oregano additive (Oregpig ® , Pecs, Hungary),<br />
composed <strong>of</strong> dried leaf <strong>and</strong> flower <strong>of</strong> Origanum vulgare, enriched with 500 g/kg cold-pressed<br />
essential oils <strong>of</strong> the leaf <strong>and</strong> flower <strong>of</strong> Origanum vulgare, <strong>and</strong> containing 60 g carvacrol <strong>and</strong> 55 g<br />
thymol/kg. Dietary oregano improved growth in growth-retarded growing-finishing pigs <strong>and</strong> had<br />
nonspecific immunostimulatory effects on porcine immune cells (Walter <strong>and</strong> Bilkei, 2004).<br />
Menthol is <strong>of</strong>ten used as a repellent against insects <strong>and</strong> in lotions to cool legs (especially for<br />
horses) (Franz et al., 2005).<br />
Milk cows become restless <strong>and</strong> aggressive each time a group <strong>of</strong> cows are separated <strong>and</strong> regrouped.<br />
This can last a few days putting cows in more stress resulting in a drop in milk production. Two<br />
Auburn University scientists could solve this problem by spraying anise oil (Pimpinella anisum) on<br />
the cows. Treated animals could not distinguish any differences among the cows in new or old<br />
groupings. They were mellower <strong>and</strong> kept their milk production up. Among many other oils tested<br />
but only anise seemed to work (Anonymous, 1990).<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils have been found effective in honeybee diseases (Ozkirim, 2006; Ozkirim et al.,<br />
2007).<br />
In this review, we tried to give you an insight into the use <strong>of</strong> essential oils in animal health <strong>and</strong><br />
nutrition. Due to the paucity <strong>of</strong> research in this important area there is not much to report. Most<br />
information on usage exists in the form <strong>of</strong> not-so-well-qualified reports. We hope that this rather<br />
preliminary report can be <strong>of</strong> use as a starting point for more comprehensive reports.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Alcicek, A., M. Bozkurt, <strong>and</strong> M. Cabuk, 2003. The effect <strong>of</strong> an essential oil combination derived from selected<br />
herbs growing wild in Turkey on broiler performance. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 33(2): 89–94.<br />
Alcicek, A., M. Bozkurt, <strong>and</strong> M. Cabuk, 2004. The effect <strong>of</strong> a mixture <strong>of</strong> herbal essential oils, an organic acid<br />
or a probiotic on broiler performance. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 34(4): 217–222.<br />
Anonymous, 1990. Bovine aromatherapy: Common herb quells cowcophony. HerbalGram, 22: 8.<br />
Anonymous, 2001. Pet care & pest control—using essential oils. Scents Sensibility Newsletter, 2(12): 1 (http://<br />
scentsnsensibility.com/newsletter/Apr0601.htm). Accessed 2008.<br />
Anonymous, 2008. Zoopharmacognosy—working with aromatic medicine (http://www.ingraham.co.uk/).<br />
Accessed 2008.
892 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Anonymous, 2009. Treating livestock with medicinal plants: Beneficial or toxic?—Ocimum basilicum, O.<br />
americanum <strong>and</strong> O. micranthum. (http://www.ansci.cornell.edu/plants/medicinal/basil.html). Accessed<br />
September 2009.<br />
Athanassopoulou, F., E. Karagouni, E. Dotsika, V. Ragias, J. Tavla, <strong>and</strong> P. Christ<strong>of</strong>illoyani, 2004a. Efficacy <strong>and</strong><br />
toxicity <strong>of</strong> orally administrated anticoccidial drugs for innovative treatments <strong>of</strong> Polysporoplasma sparis<br />
infection in Sparus aurata L. J. Appl. Ichthyol., 20: 345–354.<br />
Athanassopoulou, F., E. Karagouni, E. Dotsika, V. Ragias, J. Tavla, P. Christ<strong>of</strong>illoyanis <strong>and</strong> I. Vatsos, 2004b.<br />
Efficacy <strong>and</strong> toxicity <strong>of</strong> orally administrated anticoccidial drugs for innovative treatments <strong>of</strong> Myxobolus<br />
sp. infection in Puntazzo puntazzo. Dis. Aquat. Org., 62: 217–226.<br />
Bakkali, F., S. Averbeck, D. Averbeck, <strong>and</strong> M. Idaomar, 2008. Biological effects <strong>of</strong> essential oils—a review.<br />
Food Chem. Technol., 46: 446–475.<br />
Baser, K.H.C., 1995. Analysis <strong>and</strong> quality assessment <strong>of</strong> essential oils. In: A Manual on the <strong>Essential</strong> Oil<br />
Industry, K.T. De Silva (ed.), pp. 155–177. Vienna: UNIDO.<br />
Baser, K.H.C., 2008. Chemistry <strong>and</strong> biological activities <strong>of</strong> carvacrol <strong>and</strong> carvacrol-bearing essential oils. Curr.<br />
Pharm. Des., 14: 3106–3120.<br />
Baser, K.H.C. <strong>and</strong> F. Demirci, 2007. Chemistry <strong>of</strong> essential oils. In: Flavours <strong>and</strong> Fragrances. Chemistry,<br />
Bioprocessing <strong>and</strong> Sustainability, R.G. Berger (ed.), pp. 43–86. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.<br />
Bassett, R., 2000. Oreganos positive impact on poultry production. World Poultry-Elsevier, 16: 31–34.<br />
Botsoglou, N.A., E. Christaki, D.J. Fletouris, P. Florou-Paneri, <strong>and</strong> A.B. Spais, 2002a. The effect <strong>of</strong> dietary<br />
oregano essential oil on lipid oxidation in raw <strong>and</strong> cooked chicken during refrigerated storage. Meat Sci.,<br />
62: 259–265.<br />
Botsoglou, N.A., P. Floron-Paneri, E. Christaki, D.J. Fletouris, <strong>and</strong> A.B. Spais, 2002b. Effect <strong>of</strong> dietary oregano<br />
essential oil on performance <strong>of</strong> chickens <strong>and</strong> on iron-induced lipid peroxidation <strong>of</strong> breast, thigh <strong>and</strong><br />
abdominal fat tissues. Br. Poult. Sci., 43(2): 223–230.<br />
Bozkurt, M. <strong>and</strong> K.H.C. Baser, 2002a. The effect <strong>of</strong> antibiotic, Mannan oligosaccharide <strong>and</strong> essential oil mixture<br />
on the laying egg performance. 1st European Symp. on Bioactive Secondary Plant Products in<br />
Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria, 4–5 Ekim 2002.<br />
Bozkurt, M. <strong>and</strong> K.H.C. Baser, 2002b. The effect <strong>of</strong> commercial organic acid, probiotic <strong>and</strong> essential oil mixture<br />
at two levels on the performance <strong>of</strong> broilers. 1st European Symp. on Bioactive Secondary Plant<br />
Products in Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria, 4–5 Ekim 2002.<br />
Buchbauer, G., L. Jirovetz, M. Wasicky, <strong>and</strong> A. Nikiforov, 1994. Comparative investigation <strong>of</strong> Douglas fir<br />
headspace samples, essential oils, <strong>and</strong> extracts (needles <strong>and</strong> twigs) using GC-FID <strong>and</strong> GC-FTIR-MS.<br />
J. Agric. Food Chem., 42: 2852–2854.<br />
Busquet, M., S. Calsamiglia, A. Ferret, <strong>and</strong> C. Kamel, 2006. Plant extracts affect in vitro rumen microbial fermentation.<br />
J. Dairy Sci., 89: 761–771.<br />
Cabuk, M., M. Bozkurt, A. Alcicek, A.U. Catli, <strong>and</strong> K.H.C. Baser, 2006a. Effect <strong>of</strong> dietary essential oil mixture<br />
on performance <strong>of</strong> laying hens in summer season, S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 36(4): 215–221.<br />
Cabuk, M., M. Bozkurt, A. Alcicek, Y. Akbas, <strong>and</strong> K. Kucukyilmaz, 2006b. Effect <strong>of</strong> a herbal essential oil<br />
mixture on growth <strong>and</strong> internal organ weight <strong>of</strong> broilers from young <strong>and</strong> old breeder flocks. S. Afr. J.<br />
Anim. Sci., 36(2): 135–141.<br />
Cardozo, P.W., S. Calsamiglia, A. Ferret, <strong>and</strong> C. Kamel, 2005. Screening for the effects <strong>of</strong> natural plant extracts<br />
at different pH on in vitro Rumen microbial fermentation <strong>of</strong> a high-concentrate diet for beef cattle.<br />
J. Anim. Sci., 83: 2572–2579.<br />
Chitwood, D.J., 2002. Phytochemical based strategies for nematode control. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol., 40:<br />
221–249.<br />
Chobanov, R.E., A.N. Aleskerova, S.N. Dzhanahmedova, <strong>and</strong> L.A. Safieva, 2004. Experimental estimation <strong>of</strong><br />
antiparasitic properties <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>of</strong> some Artemisia (Asteraceae) species <strong>of</strong> Azerbaijan flora.<br />
Rastitel’nye Resursy, 40(4): 94–98.<br />
Chow, W.H., K.L. Cheung, H.M. Ling, <strong>and</strong> T. See, 1989. Potentiation <strong>of</strong> warfarin anticoagulation by topical<br />
methylsalicylate ointment. J. R. Soc. Med., 82(8), 501–502.<br />
Ciftci, M., T. Guler, B. Dalkilic, <strong>and</strong> O.N. Ertas, 2005. The effect <strong>of</strong> anise oil (Pimpinella anisum L.) on broiler<br />
performance. Int. J. Poultry Sci., 4(11): 851–855.<br />
Clark, L. <strong>and</strong> J. Shivik, 2002. Aerosolized essential oils <strong>and</strong> individual natural product compounds as brown<br />
tree snake repellents. Pest Manag. Sci., 58(8): 775–783.<br />
Coskun, S., O. Giriskin, M. Kurkcuoglu, H. Malyer, A.O. Giriskin, N. Kirimer, <strong>and</strong> K.H.C. Baser, 2008.<br />
Acaricidal efficacy <strong>of</strong> Origanum onites L. essential oil against Rhipicephalus turanicus (Ixodidae).<br />
Parasitol. Res., 103: 259–261.
<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> Used in Veterinary Medicine 893<br />
Council Regulation (EEC) N. 2377/90 (1990), laying down a Community procedure for the establishment <strong>of</strong><br />
maximum residue limits <strong>of</strong> veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs <strong>of</strong> animal origin (http://www.<br />
bsmi.gov.tw/wSite/public/Attachment/f1224040164375.pdf). Accessed 2008.<br />
Elgayyar, M., F.A. Draughon, D.A. Golden, <strong>and</strong> J.A. Mount, 2001. Antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> essential oils from<br />
plants against selected pathogenic <strong>and</strong> saprophytic microorganisms. J. Food Prot., 64(7): 1019–1024.<br />
EMEA, 1999. Salicylic acid, sodium salicylate, aluminium salicylate <strong>and</strong> methyl salicylate. Committee for<br />
Veterinary Medicinal Products (EMEA/MRL/696/99, 1999) (http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/vet/<br />
mrls/069699en.pdf). Accessed 2008.<br />
Ertas, O.N., T. Guler, M. Ciftci, B. Dalkilic, <strong>and</strong> U.G. Simsek, 2006. The effect <strong>of</strong> an essential oil mixture from<br />
oregano, clove <strong>and</strong> anis on broiler performance. Int. J. Poultry Sci., 4(11): 879–884.<br />
Estell, R.E., E.L. Fredrickson, M.R. Tellez, K.M. Havstad, W.L. Shupe, D.M. Anderson, <strong>and</strong> M.D. Remmenga,<br />
1998. Effects <strong>of</strong> volatile compounds on consumption <strong>of</strong> alfalfa pellets by sheep. J. Anim. Sci., 76: 228–233.<br />
Franz, Ch., R. Bauer, R. Carle, D. Tedesco, A. Tubaro, K. Zitterl-Eglseer, 2005. Study on the assessment <strong>of</strong><br />
plants/herbs, plant/herb extracts <strong>and</strong> their naturally or synthetically produced components as “additives”<br />
for use in animal production. CFT/EFSA/FEEDAP/2005/01 (http://www.agronavigator.cz/UserFiles/<br />
File/Agronavigator/Kvasnickova_2/EFSA_feedap_report_plantsherbs.pdf). Accessed 2008.<br />
Foster, S., 2002. The fighting power <strong>of</strong> Oregano: This versatile herb packs a powerful punch—earth medicine.<br />
Better Nutr., March: 1.<br />
Garcia, V., P. Catala-Gregori, J. Madrid, F. Hern<strong>and</strong>ez, M.D. Megias, H.M. Andrade-Montemayor, 2007.<br />
Potential <strong>of</strong> carvacrol to modify in vitro rumen fermentation as compared with monensin. Animal, 1:<br />
675–680.<br />
Gauthier, R., 2005. Organic acids <strong>and</strong> essential oils, a realistic alternative to antibiotic growth promoters in<br />
poultry, I Forum Internacional de Avicultura. Foz do Iguaçu, PR, Brazil, August 17–19, 2005.<br />
Ghisalberti, E.L., 2002. Secondary metabolites with antinematodal activity. In: Studies in Natural Products<br />
Chemistry, Atta-ur-Rahman (ed.), Vol. 26, pp. 425–506. Amsterdam: Elsevier <strong>Science</strong> BV.<br />
Giannenas, I., P.P. Florou, M. Papazahariadou, E. Christaki, <strong>and</strong> N.A. Botsoglou, A.B. Spais, 2003. Effect <strong>of</strong><br />
dietary supplementation with oregano essential oil on performance <strong>of</strong> broilers after experimental infection<br />
with Eimeria tenella. Arch. Anim. Nutr., 57(2): 99–106.<br />
Githiori, J.B., S. Athanasiadou, <strong>and</strong> S.M. Thamsborg, 2006. Use <strong>of</strong> plants in novel approaches for control <strong>of</strong><br />
gastrointestinal helminthes in livestock with emphasis on small ruminants. Vet. Parasitol., 139: 308–320.<br />
Horosova, K., D. Bujnakova, <strong>and</strong> V. Kmet, 2006. Effect <strong>of</strong> oregano essential oil on chicken lactobacilli <strong>and</strong><br />
E. coli. Folia Microbiol., 51(4): 278–280.<br />
Jang, I.S., Y.H. Ko, S.Y. Kang, <strong>and</strong> C.Y. Lee, 2007. Effect <strong>of</strong> commercial essential oil on growth performance<br />
digestive enzyme activity <strong>and</strong> intestinal micr<strong>of</strong>lora population in broiler chickens. Anim. Feed Sci.<br />
Technol., 134: 304–315.<br />
Janz, J.A.M., P.C.H. Morel, B.H.P. Wilkinson, <strong>and</strong> R.W. Purchas, 2007. Preliminary investigation <strong>of</strong> the effects<br />
<strong>of</strong> low-level dietary inclusion <strong>of</strong> fragrant essential oils <strong>and</strong> oleoresins on pig performance <strong>and</strong> pork quality.<br />
Meat Sci., 75: 350–355.<br />
Krimpen, M.V. <strong>and</strong> G.P. Binnendijk, 2001. Ropadiar® as alternative for anti microbial growth promoter in diets<br />
<strong>of</strong> weanling pigs. Rapport Praktijkonderzoek Veehouderij, May 2001. ISSN 0169–3689.<br />
Lahlou, M., 2003. Composition <strong>and</strong> molluscicidal properties <strong>of</strong> essential oils <strong>of</strong> five Moroccan Pinaceae.<br />
Pharm. Biol., 41(3): 207–210.<br />
Lambert, R.J.W., P.N. Sk<strong>and</strong>amis, P.J. Coote, <strong>and</strong> G.-J.E. Nychas, 2001. A study <strong>of</strong> the minimum inhibitory<br />
concentration <strong>and</strong> mode <strong>of</strong> action <strong>of</strong> oregano essential oil, thymol <strong>and</strong> carvacrol. J. Appl. Microbiol., 91:<br />
453–462.<br />
Lis-Balchin, M., 2003. Feed additives as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters: Botanicals. Proc. 9th Int.<br />
Symp. on Digestive Physiology in Pigs, Vol. 1, pp. 333–352. Banff AB, Canada: University <strong>of</strong> Alberta.<br />
Lopez-Bote, L.J., J.I. Gray, E.A. Gomaa, <strong>and</strong> C.I. Flegal, 1998. Effect <strong>of</strong> dietary administration <strong>of</strong> oil extracts<br />
from rosemary <strong>and</strong> sage on lipid oxidation in broiler meat. Br. Poult. Sci., 39: 235–240.<br />
Losa, R., 2001. The use <strong>of</strong> essential oils in animal nutrition. In: Feed Manufacturing in the Mediterranean<br />
Region. Improving Safety: From Feed to Food, J. Brufau (ed.), pp. 39–44. Zaragoza: CIHEAM-IAMZ,<br />
(Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes; v. 54), 3. Conf. <strong>of</strong> Feed Manufacturers <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean.<br />
2000/03/22–24, Reus (Spain).<br />
Moller, T., 2001., Studies on the effect <strong>of</strong> an oregano-oil-addition to feed towards nutrient digestibilities,<br />
N-balance as well as towards the parameters <strong>of</strong> microbial activity in the alimentary tract <strong>of</strong> weaned<br />
piglets; thesis, http://www.agronavigator.cz/UserFiles/File/Agronavigator/Kvasnickova_2/EFSA_feedap_<br />
report_plantsherbs.pdf, accessed July 2009.
894 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Molnar, C.<strong>and</strong> G. Bilkei, 2005. The influence <strong>of</strong> an oregano feed additive on production parameters <strong>and</strong> mortality<br />
<strong>of</strong> weaned piglets, Tieraerzliche Praxis, Ausgabe Grosstiere. Nutztiere, 33: 42–47.<br />
Moon, T., J. Wilkinson, <strong>and</strong> H. Cavanagh, 2006. Antiparasitic activity <strong>of</strong> two Lav<strong>and</strong>ula essential oils against<br />
Giardia duodenalis, Trichomonas vaginalis <strong>and</strong> Hexamita infl ata.Parasitol. Res., 99(6): 722–728.<br />
Moreira, M.R., A.G. Ponze, C.E. del Valle, <strong>and</strong> S.I. Roura, 2005. Inhibitory parameters <strong>of</strong> essential oils to<br />
reduce a foodborne pathogen. LWT, 38: 565–570.<br />
Moschetti, R., 2003. Pesticides made with botanical oils <strong>and</strong> extracts (http://www.plantoils.in/uses/other/other.<br />
html). Accessed September 2009.<br />
Onibala, J.S.I.T., K.D. Gunther, <strong>and</strong> Ut. Meulen, 2001. Effects <strong>of</strong> essential oil <strong>of</strong> spices as feed additives on the<br />
growth <strong>and</strong> carcass characteristics <strong>of</strong> growing-finishing pigs. Sustainable development in the context <strong>of</strong><br />
globalization <strong>and</strong> locality: Challenges <strong>and</strong> options for networking in Southeast Asia, EFSA.<br />
Oviedo-Rondon, E.O., S. Clemente-Hern<strong>and</strong>ez, F. Salvador, R. Williams, <strong>and</strong> R. Losa, 2006. <strong>Essential</strong> oils on<br />
mixed coccidia vaccination <strong>and</strong> infection in broilers, Int. J. Poultry Sci., 5(8): 723–730.<br />
Ozkirim, A., 2006. The detection <strong>of</strong> antibiotic resistance in the American <strong>and</strong> European Foulbrood diseases <strong>of</strong><br />
honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). PhD thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.<br />
Ozkirim, A., N. Keskin, M. Kurkcuoglu, <strong>and</strong> K.H.C. Baser, 2007. Screening alternative antibiotics-essential<br />
oils from Seseli spp. against Paenibacillus larvae subsp. larvae strains isolated from different regions <strong>of</strong><br />
Turkey, 40th Apimondia Int. Apicultural Congr., Melbourne, Australia, September 9–14, 2007.<br />
Penalver, P., B. Huerta, C. Borge, R. Astorga, R. Romero, <strong>and</strong> A. Perea, 2005. Antimicrobial activity <strong>of</strong> five<br />
essential oils against origin strains <strong>of</strong> the Enterobacteriaceae family. APMIS, 113: 1–6.<br />
Prajapati, V., A.K. Tripathi, K.K. Aggarwal, <strong>and</strong> S.P.S. Khanuja, 2005. Insecticidal, repellent <strong>and</strong> ovipositiondeterrent<br />
activity <strong>of</strong> selected essential oils against Anopheles stephensi, Aedes aegypti <strong>and</strong> Culex quinquefasciatus.<br />
Bioresource Technol., 96(16): 1749–1757.<br />
Ramanathan, M., 1995. Warfarin–topical salicylate interactions: Case reports. Med. J. Malaysia, 50(3): 278–279.<br />
Regnault-Roger, C., 1997. The potential <strong>of</strong> botanical essential oils for insect pest control. Int. Pest Manag. Rev.,<br />
2: 25–34.<br />
Rochfort, S., A.J. Parker, <strong>and</strong> F.R. Dunshea, 2008. Plant bioactives for ruminant health <strong>and</strong> productivity.<br />
Phytochemistry, 69: 299–322.<br />
Schoene, F., A. Vetter, H. Hartung, H. Bergmann, A. Biertuempfel, G. Richter, S. Mueller, <strong>and</strong> G. Breitschuh,<br />
2006. Effects <strong>of</strong> essential oils from fennel (Foeniculi aetheroleum) <strong>and</strong> caraway (Carvi aetheroleum) in<br />
pigs. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 90: 500–510.<br />
Tabanca, N., E Bedir, N. Kirimer, K.H.C. Baser, S.I. Khan, M.R. Jacob, <strong>and</strong> I.A. Khan, 2003. Antimicrobial<br />
compounds from Pimpinella species growing in Turkey. Planta Med., 69: 933.<br />
Tam, L.S., T.Y. Chan, W.K. Leung, <strong>and</strong> J.A. Critchley, 1995. Warfarin interactions with Chinese traditional<br />
medicines: Danshen <strong>and</strong> methyl salicylate medicated oil. Aust. N. Z. J. Med., 25(3): 258.<br />
Ultee, A., E.P.W. Kets, <strong>and</strong> E.J. Smid, 1999. Mechanisms <strong>of</strong> action <strong>of</strong> carvacrol in the food-borne pathogen<br />
Bacillus cereus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65: 4606–4610.<br />
U.S. Patent 4961929. Process <strong>of</strong> repelling dogs <strong>and</strong> dog repellent material (http://www.freepatentsonline.<br />
com/4961929.html). Accessed 2008.<br />
U.S. Patent 4735803. Naturally-odoriferous animal repellent (http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.<br />
cgi?article =1151&context=icwdm_usdanwrc). Accessed 2008.<br />
U.S. Patent 4847292. Repelling animals with compositions comprising citronellyl nitrile, citronellol, alphaterpinyl<br />
methyl ether <strong>and</strong> lemon oil (http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4847292.html). Accessed 2008.<br />
U.S. Patent 6159474. Animal repellant containing oils <strong>of</strong> black pepper <strong>and</strong>/or capsicum (http://www.<br />
freepatentsonline.com/6159474.html). Accessed 2008.<br />
Vogt, H. <strong>and</strong> H.W. Rauch, 1991. The use <strong>of</strong> several essential oils in broiler diets. L<strong>and</strong>bauforschung Volkenrode,<br />
41: 94–97.<br />
Wallace, R.J., N.R. McEwan, F.M. McIntosh, B. Teferedegne, <strong>and</strong> C.J. Newbold, 2002. Natural products as<br />
manipulators <strong>of</strong> rumen fermentation. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 15: 1458–1468.<br />
Walter, B.M. <strong>and</strong> G. Bilkei, 2004. Immunostimulatory effect <strong>of</strong> dietary oregano etheric oils on lymphocytes<br />
from growth-retarded, low-weight growing-finishing pigs <strong>and</strong> productivity. Tijdschrift voor<br />
Diergeneeskunde, 129(6): 178–181.<br />
Wedge, D.E., J.A. Klun, N. Tabanca, B. Demirci, T. Ozek, K.H.C. Baser, Z Liu, S. Zhang, C.L. Cantrell, <strong>and</strong><br />
J. Zhang, 2009. Bioactivity-guided Fractionation <strong>and</strong> GC-MS Fingerprinting <strong>of</strong> Angelica sinensis <strong>and</strong><br />
A. archangelica root components for antifungal <strong>and</strong> mosquito deterrent activity. J. Agric. Food Chem.,<br />
57: 464–470.<br />
Yip, A.S., W.H. Chow, Y.T. Tai, <strong>and</strong> K.L. Cheung, 1990. Adverse effect <strong>of</strong> topical methylsalicylate ointment on<br />
warfarin anticoagulation: An unrecognized potential hazard. Postgrad. Med. J., 66(775): 367–369.
20<br />
Trade <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Hugo Bovill<br />
The essential oil industry is highly complex <strong>and</strong> fragmented. There are at least 100 different producing<br />
countries, as can be seen from the map <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> <strong>of</strong> the World (Figure 20.1). Many <strong>of</strong> these<br />
producing countries have been active in these materials for many decades. They are <strong>of</strong>ten involved<br />
in essential oils due to historical colonization, for example, clove oil from Madagascar has traditionally<br />
been purchased via France, nutmeg from Indonesia through Holl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> West Indian <strong>and</strong><br />
Chinese products through Hong Kong <strong>and</strong> the United Kingdom. The main markets for essential oils<br />
are the United States (New Jersey), Germany, the United Kingdom, Japan, <strong>and</strong> France (Paris <strong>and</strong><br />
Grasse). Within each producing country, there is <strong>of</strong>ten a long supply chain starting with the small<br />
peasant artisanal producer, producing just a few kilos, who then sells it to a collector who visits<br />
different producers <strong>and</strong> purchases the different lots that are then bulked together to form an export<br />
lot, which is then <strong>of</strong>ten exported by a firm based in the main capital or main seaport <strong>of</strong> that country.<br />
This exporter is equipped with the knowledge <strong>of</strong> international shipping regulations, in particular for<br />
hazardous goods, which applies to many essential oils. They also are able to quote in US$ or Euros,<br />
which is <strong>of</strong>ten not possible for small local producers (Figure 20.2).<br />
Producers <strong>of</strong> essential oils can vary from the very large, such as an orange juice factory where<br />
orange oil is a by-product, down to a small geranium distiller (Figures 20.3 <strong>and</strong> 20.4).<br />
The business is commenced by sending type samples that are examples <strong>of</strong> the production from<br />
the supplier <strong>and</strong> should be typical <strong>of</strong> the production that can be made going forward. Lot samples<br />
are normally provided to the purchaser in the foreign country to enable them to chemically analyze<br />
the quality organoleptically both on odor <strong>and</strong> flavor. It is essential that the qualities remain constant<br />
as differing qualities are not acceptable <strong>and</strong> there is normally no such thing as a “better” quality; it<br />
is either the same or it is not good. This is the key to building close relationships between suppliers<br />
in the country <strong>of</strong> origin <strong>and</strong> the purchaser.<br />
Many suppliers try to improve their processes by adapting their equipment <strong>and</strong> modernizing. In<br />
Paraguay, petitgrain distillers replaced wooden stills with stainless steel stills on the advice <strong>of</strong> overseas<br />
aid noncommercial organizations (NCOs). This led to a change in quality <strong>and</strong> the declining<br />
usage <strong>of</strong> petitgrain oil. The quality issues made customers unhappy, <strong>and</strong> in fact the Paraguayan<br />
distillers reverted back to their traditional wooden stills (Figure 20.5).<br />
Market information, as provided by the processor, is essential to developing long-term relationships.<br />
To enable the producer to underst<strong>and</strong> market pricing, he should appreciate that when receiving<br />
more enquiries for an oil, it is likely that the price is moving upward <strong>and</strong> it is by these signs <strong>of</strong><br />
dem<strong>and</strong> that he can establish that there are potential shortages in the market (Figure 20.6).<br />
Producers <strong>and</strong> dealers exporting oil should be prepared to commit to carry inventory to ensure<br />
carryover <strong>and</strong> adequate delivery reliability. It is important to note that with climate change, weather<br />
<strong>and</strong> market conditions are becoming increasingly important, <strong>and</strong> prior to planting, advice should be<br />
sought from the buyer as to their intentions, for short, medium, <strong>and</strong> long term. Long- <strong>and</strong> mediumterm<br />
contracts are unusual <strong>and</strong> it is becoming increasingly common for flavor <strong>and</strong> fragrance companies<br />
not to commit over 1 year but to buy h<strong>and</strong> to mouth <strong>and</strong> purely give estimated volume needs<br />
going forward. This strengthens the role <strong>of</strong> the essential oil dealers, <strong>of</strong> whom there are very few<br />
remaining in the main trading centers <strong>of</strong> the world, such as the United States, France, the United<br />
Kingdom, Germany, <strong>and</strong> Japan.<br />
895
896 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
FIGURE 20.1 (See color fold-out insert at the back <strong>of</strong> the book) World map showing production centers <strong>of</strong> essential oils. Courtesy <strong>of</strong> Treatt PLC.
Trade <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 897<br />
Distillers in country <strong>of</strong><br />
origin<br />
Merchant<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oil factory<br />
Food & beverage<br />
manufacturers<br />
&<br />
health/household<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils<br />
FIGURE 20.2 Flowchart showing the supply chain from distiller to finished product.<br />
FIGURE 20.3 South American orange juice factory. (Photograph by kind permission <strong>of</strong> Sucocitrico<br />
Cutrale Ltd.)<br />
FIGURE 20.4<br />
Copper Still in East Africa.
898 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
FIGURE 20.5 Petitgrain still.<br />
FIGURE 20.6 Market information.
Trade <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 899<br />
To quote from Marketing <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> (n.d.) by W.A. Ennever <strong>of</strong> R.C. Treatt & Co. Ltd, London<br />
in the 1960s, “The dealer serves as a buffer between these two interests (producer <strong>and</strong> essential oil<br />
merchant house) by purchasing <strong>and</strong> carrying stocks <strong>of</strong> oils for his own account <strong>and</strong> risk when the<br />
producer <strong>and</strong>/or merchant house is unable to wait for the user’s dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> hold stocks until the<br />
latter is ready to purchase. The risk <strong>of</strong> market fluctuations to the essential oil dealer or merchant in<br />
this practice, is quite considerable, but naturally, is reduced by his knowledge <strong>and</strong> experience <strong>of</strong> the<br />
trade. He is equipped to h<strong>and</strong>le large or small quantities <strong>and</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> qualities, as a buyer or seller.<br />
Thus through the dealer’s participation, the producer has a larger number <strong>of</strong> outlets for his production<br />
<strong>and</strong> the user can be reasonably certain <strong>of</strong> finding supplies <strong>of</strong> the oils required when he considers<br />
it necessary to purchase.” The dealer is aware <strong>of</strong> world markets <strong>and</strong> potential shortages that other<br />
producers may not be aware <strong>of</strong>, as these are happening in different continents. They can also have<br />
the knowledge <strong>of</strong> increasing dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> movements in consumer tastes.<br />
Some essential oils are produced for their chemical constituents, whereas most are produced for<br />
their aromatic parts, <strong>and</strong> it is important that suppliers underst<strong>and</strong> what is expected <strong>of</strong> them by their<br />
customer, whether it is chemical constituents naturally occurring or whether it is the aroma <strong>and</strong> flavor.<br />
Examples <strong>of</strong> this are turpentine oil, litsea cubeba oil, sassafras oil, clove leaf oil, <strong>and</strong> cori<strong>and</strong>er oil.<br />
There is greater dem<strong>and</strong> for ethical supplies, but it should be borne in mind that these surprisingly<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten do not receive a premium <strong>and</strong> when entering the essential oil industry it is important to<br />
note that it is not always the highest priced oils that give the best return as these are <strong>of</strong>ten those that<br />
are the most popular for new entrants to produce. Before entering into production <strong>of</strong> an essential oil,<br />
it is important to fully verify the market. It may be that there is good supply locally <strong>of</strong> the herb, for<br />
example, but maybe this is for a traditional purpose such as local medicinal use, producing local<br />
foodstuffs, or liqueurs.<br />
Origins are constantly changing <strong>and</strong> moving, as can be seen from the following: peppermint oil<br />
Mitcham production went from Engl<strong>and</strong> to the United States; mint came from China, then went to<br />
Brazil <strong>and</strong> Paraguay, back to China <strong>and</strong> now to India.<br />
Within the essential oil market, there are generally four different types <strong>of</strong> buyers: aromatherapy,<br />
the flavor <strong>and</strong> fragrance industries, <strong>and</strong> dealers. Many <strong>of</strong> these can be contacted through agents who<br />
would not pay for the goods themselves but would take a nominal commission <strong>of</strong>, say, 5%. The end<br />
users range from aromatherapists selling very small volumes <strong>of</strong> high, fine quality, natural essential<br />
oils to flavor <strong>and</strong> fragrance companies, <strong>and</strong> in a few cases, consumer product companies. The main<br />
markets are the essential oils dealers, <strong>of</strong> which there are probably 10 or 20 major companies remaining<br />
in the world, some <strong>of</strong> which are also involved in the manufacture <strong>of</strong> flavors or fragrances. To<br />
avoid conflicts <strong>of</strong> interest, it is perhaps better to work with those who concentrate solely on raw<br />
materials. Several <strong>of</strong> these companies have been established for many years <strong>and</strong> have a good trading<br />
history. Some information about them can be gained from their websites, but without meeting them<br />
in person, it is not easy to establish their credentials.<br />
Conditions <strong>of</strong> trade are normally done on a FOB or a CIF basis, <strong>and</strong> the price should be given<br />
before samples are sent. With each sample, a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS), a Child Labor<br />
Certificate, <strong>and</strong> a Certificate <strong>of</strong> Analysis should be sent. It should be noted that the drums should be<br />
sealed <strong>and</strong> that the sample should be fully topped with nitrogen or be full to ensure that there is no<br />
oxygen present, in order to make sure that oxidation is avoided. The sample bottles should be made<br />
from glass <strong>and</strong> not from plastic to avoid contamination by phthalates. The lots should be bulked<br />
before sampling <strong>and</strong> a flashpoint test should be obtained to guarantee that it is within the law to send<br />
the sample by mail or by air freight with the correct labeling.<br />
Many customers are able to give advice on production, but dealers in particular are best placed<br />
to advise. To enable contact with such dealers, it is worthwhile attending international meetings<br />
such as the International Federation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> <strong>and</strong> Aroma Trades (IFEAT) annual conference<br />
or reading the Perfumer <strong>and</strong> Flavorist magazine, which gives full details <strong>of</strong> brokers, dealers,<br />
<strong>and</strong> essential oil suppliers. There is no reference site that is 100% reliable in pricing for essential
900 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
oils; this information should be gained by working with a variety <strong>of</strong> buyers, <strong>and</strong> from this a knowledge<br />
<strong>of</strong> the market can be acquired.<br />
The essential oil industry is very traditional <strong>and</strong> even though there have been changes in analytical<br />
methods <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong>s, the knowledge required in 1950 by buyers such as Mr Ennever <strong>of</strong> Treatt<br />
(as can be seen from his quotation earlier in this chapter) are not too different from today. There<br />
is greater dem<strong>and</strong> for organically certified, Kosher, Halal, <strong>and</strong> other st<strong>and</strong>ards. The market can<br />
change far quicker now than in the past, thanks to the worldwide web. Producers are <strong>of</strong>ten their<br />
own worst enemies <strong>and</strong> can destroy their own successful markets by communicating with their<br />
neighboring farmers, thereby encouraging them to enter the market. This can depress prices as a<br />
result <strong>of</strong> increased supply, but on the other h<strong>and</strong>, it can sometimes be in the interest <strong>of</strong> a sole<br />
producer to have other producers participating in the supply, to ensure guarantees <strong>of</strong> supply <strong>and</strong> to<br />
lower the costs <strong>of</strong> production, which in turn encourages buyers to use the oil. <strong>Oils</strong> such as patchouli<br />
<strong>and</strong> grapefruit have had significant changes in price, as can be seen in the price graphs in Figures 20.7<br />
through 20.9.<br />
These price movements have reduced dem<strong>and</strong> as major buyers <strong>of</strong> these products have had to look<br />
for alternatives to replace them as they are unable to cope with the massively increased prices from<br />
US$10 to US$100 for grapefruit <strong>and</strong> from US$12.5 to US$70 per kilo for peppermint oil. It can be<br />
seen, therefore, that stable pricing can lead to increased dem<strong>and</strong>. Unstable pricing can lead to the<br />
death <strong>of</strong> essential oils. This is an important reason for holding inventory so that producers can enter<br />
into long-term associations with essential oil buyers to ensure good relationships.<br />
FIGURE 20.7<br />
US$/kg<br />
120.00<br />
100.00<br />
80.00<br />
60.00<br />
40.00<br />
20.00<br />
0.00<br />
Price graph <strong>of</strong> grapefruit oil.<br />
DATE<br />
1-Jun-75<br />
1-Jan-85<br />
1-Jan-90<br />
1-Jan-95<br />
01-Jan-05<br />
01-Apr-05<br />
01-Aug-05<br />
01-Mar-06<br />
Florida grapefruit oil<br />
Average US$30.36<br />
01-Aug-06<br />
01-Dec-06<br />
01-Feb-07<br />
01-Jun-07<br />
01-Nov-07<br />
01-Jan-08<br />
01-Apr-08<br />
01-Nov-08<br />
US$/kg<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
Yearly average price for piperita<br />
peppermint oil<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008<br />
Average US$30.1<br />
FIGURE 20.8<br />
Price graph <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil (piperita).
Trade <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 901<br />
US$/kg<br />
12<br />
Yearly average price for<br />
demontholised peppermint oil<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009<br />
Average US$8.29<br />
FIGURE 20.9<br />
Price graph <strong>of</strong> peppermint oil (arvensis).<br />
In the 1970s, there was considerable fraud <strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> dollars, caused by the shipment <strong>of</strong><br />
essential oils from Indonesia to the major buyers. The oils were in fact water, despite analysis certificates<br />
from Indonesian Government laboratories showing them to be the named essential oil. Payment<br />
had been made by letters <strong>of</strong> credit <strong>and</strong> this fraudulent practice has discouraged buyers from opening<br />
letters <strong>of</strong> credit to suppliers today. Terms <strong>of</strong> trade should normally be cash against shipping documents<br />
or payment after receipt <strong>and</strong> quality control <strong>of</strong> goods.<br />
The United States produces import statistics for essential oils <strong>and</strong> these can <strong>of</strong>ten be useful<br />
sources <strong>of</strong> information, <strong>and</strong> the European Union (EU) also has such statistics. The EU statistics<br />
cover a wide range <strong>of</strong> essential oils in each tariff; therefore the information is very vague <strong>and</strong> should<br />
not be used to make decisions. These statistics give no clues as to the quality <strong>of</strong> the product <strong>and</strong> it is<br />
that which can determine the price. The production <strong>of</strong> essential oils, as can be seen in the quotation<br />
by V.A. Beckley OBE, MC, Senior Agricultural Chemist, Kenya, who said during a meeting in 1931<br />
in Nairobi, is perhaps more chancy than most farming propositions; it most certainly requires more<br />
attention <strong>and</strong> supervision than most, <strong>and</strong>, with certain rare exceptions, does not pay much more<br />
highly is still valid to this day, despite this being said in 1935.<br />
The essential oil industry is a very small, tightly knit circle <strong>of</strong> traders, dealers, producers <strong>and</strong><br />
consumers, <strong>and</strong> apart from some notable exceptions there is a very strong trade ethos. As it is a relatively<br />
small industry in terms <strong>of</strong> global commodities, statistics are not produced <strong>and</strong> it is by relationships<br />
with customers that information becomes available. Much that is on the Internet is misleading<br />
as it is for small quantities or is <strong>of</strong>ten written by consultants, <strong>and</strong> this information can be rapidly<br />
out-<strong>of</strong>-date as prices can move extremely quickly in either direction.
21<br />
Storage <strong>and</strong> Transport<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Klaus-Dieter Protzen<br />
CONTENTS<br />
21.1 Marketing <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>: The Fragrant Gold <strong>of</strong> Nature Postulates Passion,<br />
Experience, <strong>and</strong> Knowledge ............................................................................................ 903<br />
21.2 The Impact <strong>and</strong> Consequences on the Classification <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> as<br />
Natural but Chemical Substances ................................................................................... 905<br />
21.3 Dangerous Substances <strong>and</strong> Dangerous Goods ................................................................ 907<br />
21.4 Packaging <strong>of</strong> Dangerous Goods ...................................................................................... 909<br />
21.5 Labeling .......................................................................................................................... 910<br />
21.6 List <strong>of</strong> Regulations for the Consideration <strong>of</strong> Doing Business in the EU ........................ 913<br />
References .................................................................................................................................. 915<br />
21.1 MARKETING OF ESSENTIAL OILS: THE FRAGRANT GOLD OF NATURE<br />
POSTULATES PASSION, EXPERIENCE, AND KNOWLEDGE<br />
The trade <strong>of</strong> essential oils is affected more <strong>and</strong> more by Legal regulations related to Safety Aspects.<br />
The knowledge <strong>and</strong> the compliance with these superseding regulations have today become a Conditio<br />
Sine Qua Non (precondition) to ensure trouble-free global business relation as far as regulatory requirements<br />
are concerned as these requirements <strong>of</strong>ten may adversely affect usual commercial aspects.<br />
When placing essential oils on the market in the EU for use as flavors <strong>and</strong> fragrances in foods,<br />
animal feed, cosmetic pharmaceuticals, aromatherapy, <strong>and</strong> so on, among others, the following regulations<br />
have to be observed (Dueshop, 2008):<br />
– Council Directive 79/831/EEC—Dangerous Substances (see Section 21.6)<br />
– Dangerous Preparations 99/45/EEC<br />
– EU Flavouring Directive No. 88/388/EEC <strong>and</strong> a new EU flavor regulation in the stage <strong>of</strong><br />
announcement<br />
– Novel Food Directive No. 258/97/EEC<br />
– Labelling Directive 2000/13/EC—food allergens<br />
– EU Food Regulation No. 178/2002/EU<br />
– New Pesticide Provisions—Regulation No. 396/2005/EU<br />
– New EU Cosmetic Regulations Amending Directive No. 76/768/EEC—restrictions <strong>and</strong><br />
bans (see Table 21.2 at the end <strong>of</strong> this chapter)<br />
– Detergent Use Regulation No. 648/2004/EC<br />
– EU Pharmaceutical Legislation—GMP aspects<br />
– Biocide Use Directive No. 98/8/EEC<br />
– Dangerous Substance Directive DSD 67/584/EEC<br />
903
904 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils are agro-based products that are generally manufactured by or collected from<br />
small individual producers. A large-scale production would require capital investment, which is<br />
rarely attracted as investors evidently realize the problems that no quick return <strong>of</strong> money is ensured<br />
because <strong>of</strong> too many factors influencing the market negatively like the dependency on weather conditions<br />
affecting the size <strong>of</strong> a crop over the whole vegetation period, competing crops challenging<br />
the acreage, a keen global competition striving for market shares, <strong>and</strong> narrow margins that do not<br />
compensate the involved risks. These aggravating factors also have an impact on the trade <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oils.<br />
A major part <strong>of</strong> the essential oil industry <strong>and</strong> the trade <strong>of</strong> these articles are dominated by smallscale<br />
<strong>and</strong> medium-sized family enterprises as only entrepreneurs with passion, a personal engagement<br />
<strong>and</strong> a persistent dedication as well as a long-st<strong>and</strong>ing experience nerve themselves to stay<br />
successfully in this business <strong>of</strong> the liquid gold <strong>of</strong> nature.<br />
Success in the field <strong>of</strong> essential oils depends on enthusiasm <strong>and</strong> hard work, on a broad knowledge<br />
<strong>of</strong> the market situation, in spending a lot <strong>of</strong> time <strong>and</strong> cost to investigate new ideas <strong>of</strong> state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art<br />
conditions <strong>of</strong> processing raw materials that affect yield <strong>and</strong> quality <strong>and</strong> the return <strong>of</strong> investment, the<br />
adherence to comply with ever changing administrative regulations.<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils are natural substances mainly obtained from vegetable raw materials either by<br />
distillation with water or steam or by mechanical process (expression) from the epicarp <strong>of</strong> citrus<br />
fruits. They are concentrated fragrance <strong>and</strong> flavor materials <strong>of</strong> complex composition, in general<br />
volatile alcohols, aldehydes, ethers, esters, ketones, hydrocarbons, <strong>and</strong> phenols <strong>of</strong> the group <strong>of</strong><br />
mono- <strong>and</strong> sesquiterpenes or phenylpropanes as well as nonvolatile lactones.<br />
A definition <strong>of</strong> the term essential oils <strong>and</strong> related fragrance/aromatic substances is given in the ISO-<br />
Norm 9235 Aromatic Natural Raw Materials (International St<strong>and</strong>ard Organization, Geneva, 1997).<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> their composition essential oils are classified by regulatory authorities in the EU as<br />
“Natural” but also as “Chemical Substances” (Dueshop, 2007).<br />
The classification <strong>of</strong> chemical Substances is laid down in the Council Directive 67/548 <strong>and</strong> subsequent<br />
amendments but in particular in Council Directive 79/831/EEC <strong>of</strong> 18-09-1979. This 6th<br />
amendment is the basis <strong>of</strong> all existing regulations for dangerous/hazardous chemicals as it earmarked<br />
the beginning <strong>of</strong> a new era.<br />
The topic REACH will not be covered in this chapter because <strong>of</strong> its complexity <strong>and</strong> too many<br />
open questions <strong>and</strong> answers respectively at the time <strong>of</strong> this writing. I hope, however, that in exchange<br />
a brief introduction to the historic development <strong>of</strong> the existing regulatory framework can be <strong>of</strong> help<br />
to underst<strong>and</strong> the Safety Aspects, which are the background <strong>of</strong> the actual regulations as well as the<br />
forthcoming impediments in connection with REACH.<br />
REACH is the abbreviation for Registration, Evaluation, Authorization <strong>of</strong> Chemicals. It is another<br />
impeding Regulation in Europe—the consistent continuation <strong>of</strong> the existing rules to satisfy the EU<br />
administration <strong>of</strong> a perfect system to safeguard absolute security to protect humans <strong>and</strong> the environment<br />
regarding the use <strong>of</strong> chemicals within the EU.<br />
For the trade, that is, the industry as well as importers <strong>and</strong> dealers <strong>of</strong> essential oils, REACH is a<br />
heavy burden dem<strong>and</strong>ing, already in the forefront, an unbelievable amount <strong>of</strong> time to clarify questions<br />
regarding the required product information for an appropriate registration <strong>of</strong> the so-called<br />
natural complex substances (NCS).<br />
Before the publication <strong>of</strong> Directive 79/831/EEC only a few people were aware <strong>of</strong> the aftermath<br />
<strong>of</strong> a centralized European administration. Regulations regarding transport <strong>of</strong> dangerous goods<br />
were adhered—the trade <strong>of</strong> essential oils was well aware <strong>of</strong> the risk <strong>of</strong> flammability <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> the<br />
oils but most people, however, were caught more or less unprepared with regard to the new classification<br />
that natural essential oils have to be considered as “chemicals.” The new Directive with<br />
its detailed regulations came as a surprise. It terminated the familiar view that essential oils<br />
because <strong>of</strong> their natural origin (<strong>and</strong> the fact they were used for centuries in medicines, flavors, <strong>and</strong><br />
fragrances) could continue to exist as a special group <strong>of</strong> natural products like a sleeping beauty in<br />
the reality <strong>of</strong> a hostile world <strong>of</strong> administrative regulations. Now, all <strong>of</strong> a sudden it caused essential
Storage <strong>and</strong> Transport <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 905<br />
oils to be considered as chemical substances <strong>of</strong> which a major part had to be classified as hazardous<br />
“chemical” substances.<br />
21.2 THE IMPACT AND CONSEQUENCES ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF<br />
ESSENTIAL OILS AS NATURAL BUT CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES<br />
The bell for the new era sounded when chemical substances in use within the EC during a reference<br />
period <strong>of</strong> 10 years had to be notified for European Inventory <strong>of</strong> Existing Commercial Chemical<br />
Substances (EINECS).<br />
At that time EINECS enabled the EC administration not only to dispose <strong>of</strong>, for the first time, a<br />
survey <strong>of</strong> all chemical substances that had been in use in the EC between January 1, 1971 <strong>and</strong><br />
September 18, 1981, but also to distinguish between “known substances” <strong>and</strong> “new substances.”<br />
“KNOWN” substances are all chemicals notified for EINECS, whereas all chemical substances<br />
that were not notified (<strong>and</strong> subsequently registered as “known substances” in EINECS) are considered<br />
by the EU administration as “new chemicals.”<br />
EINECS is a “closed list”—“New” chemical substances to be placed on the market in the EU<br />
after the deadline <strong>of</strong> September 18, 1981, therefore have to be notified for the European List <strong>of</strong><br />
Notified Chemical Substances (ELINCS), the list complementing EINECS.<br />
NEW chemical substances can be placed on—<strong>and</strong> used in—the market <strong>of</strong> the EU only after<br />
clearance according to uniform EC st<strong>and</strong>ards by competent (national) authorities. Thus, from the<br />
beginning, all potential risks <strong>of</strong> a (new) chemical substance are ascertained for a proper labeling for<br />
h<strong>and</strong>ling to avoid risks for humans as well as to protect the environment.<br />
“Known” chemical substances (notified for EINECS) enjoyed, in a transitional phase, temporary<br />
exemption from the obligation to furnish the same safety data required for new chemical substances.<br />
Based on the experience gathered during their use, for quite a while it was assumed (Dueshop,<br />
2007) that the temporary continuation <strong>of</strong> their use could be tolerated according to the hitherto used<br />
older st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>of</strong> safety—<strong>and</strong> in view <strong>of</strong> the fact that a short-term clearance <strong>of</strong> approximately<br />
100,000 chemical substances registered in EINECS could not be effected overnight.<br />
Because these products have been notified for EINECS <strong>and</strong> therefore known to the regulative<br />
agencies in the EC, they are screened step by step either depending on their potential risk or according<br />
to the volumes produced or imported respectively to make sure that the known substances also<br />
comply with the new safety st<strong>and</strong>ards according to the following volume b<strong>and</strong>s:<br />
906 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
But ATTENTION—the CAS number is an identification number for a chemical substance allotted<br />
by a private enterprise in the United States <strong>and</strong> must not be confused with the EINECS registration<br />
number.<br />
EINECS <strong>and</strong> ELINCS numbers are registration numbers allocated by the EU administration,<br />
that is, ECB/JRC at ISPRA.<br />
CAS numbers are assigned by the (private) CAS organization in the United States with the<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> (defined) chemical substances. A CAS number is allocated to a new<br />
(defined) chemical substance only after thorough examination <strong>of</strong> the product as per IUPAC Rules<br />
by the CAS organization to make sure that irrespective <strong>of</strong> different chemical descriptions <strong>and</strong>/or<br />
coined names that have been given to a product, a substance can be clearly related by the allocated<br />
CAS number according to the (CAS) principle “one substance—one number.”<br />
Using the CAS number system to register also chemical substances in EINECS that are not<br />
defined chemicals, the problem had to be sorted out how to register, for example, essential oils as<br />
they are products <strong>of</strong> complex composition. It was therefore necessary to extend the CAS system for<br />
this reason to allot a CAS number also to the so-called UVCBs, that is, substances that have been<br />
summed up under this abbreviation as substances <strong>of</strong> “unknown or variable composition, complex<br />
reaction products, <strong>and</strong> biological materials.”<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils are eventually registered as NCS by their botanical origin as for example:<br />
Lavender oil: Lavender—Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia ext.<br />
EINECS registration no. 289-995-2—CAS no. (Einecs) 90063-37-9 extractives <strong>and</strong> their physically<br />
modified derivatives such as tinctures, concretes, absolutes, essential oils, terpenes, terpenefree<br />
fractions, distillates, <strong>and</strong> residues from Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia—Labiatae (Lamiaceae)<br />
Lavender oil: Lavender—Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia ext.<br />
EINECS registration no. 283-994-0—CAS no. (Einecs) 84776-65-8 extractives . . . from<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia angustifolia— Labiatae (Lamiaceae)<br />
Lavender concrete/absolute: Lavender—Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia ext.<br />
EINECS registration no. 289-995-2—CAS no. (Einecs) 90063-37-9 extractives <strong>and</strong> their physically<br />
modified derivatives such as tinctures, concretes, absolutes, essential oils, terpenes, terpenefree<br />
fractions, distillates, <strong>and</strong> residues from Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia—Labiatae (Lamiaceae)<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>in oil: Lav<strong>and</strong>ula hybrida ext.<br />
EINECS registration no. 294-470-6—CAS no. (Einecs) 91722-69-9 extractives <strong>and</strong> their physically<br />
modified derivatives such as tinctures, concretes, absolutes, essential oils, terpenes, terpenefree<br />
fractions, distillates, <strong>and</strong> residues from Lav<strong>and</strong>ula hybrida—Labiatae (Lamiaceae)<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>in oil abrialis: Lav<strong>and</strong>ula hybrida abrial ext.<br />
EINECS registration no. 297-384-7—CAS no. (Einecs) 93455-96-0 extractives <strong>and</strong> . . . from<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>ula hybrida abrial—Labiatae (Lamiaceae)<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>in oil grosso: Lav<strong>and</strong>ula hybrida grosso ext.<br />
EINECS registration no. 297-385-2—CAS no. (Einecs) 93455-97-1 extractives <strong>and</strong> . . . from<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>ula hybrida grosso—Labiatae (Lamiaceae).<br />
Since essential oils are registered as extractives under their botanical origin, concretes/ absolutes<br />
<strong>and</strong> other natural extractives <strong>of</strong> the same botanical origin have the same EINECS <strong>and</strong> CAS numbers<br />
as the essential oil.<br />
When checking an EINECS number it is important to investigate in the <strong>of</strong>ficial original documentation<br />
as in the secondary literature there exist too many inaccuracies.
Storage <strong>and</strong> Transport <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 907<br />
TABLE 21.1<br />
Examples <strong>of</strong> Different CAS-Numbers used in USA <strong>and</strong> EINECS in EU<br />
CAS No. USA CAS No. EINECS EC Registration No.<br />
Eucalyptus oil 8000-48-4 84625-32-1 283-406-2<br />
Eucalyptus globulus Lab.—Myrtaceae<br />
Lavender oil 8000-28-0 90063-37-9 289-995-2<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia—Labiatae<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia angustifolia—Labiatae 84776-65-8 283-994-0<br />
Lemon oil 8008-56-8 8028-48-6 284-515-8<br />
84929-31-7 284-515-8<br />
Citrus limon L.—Rutaceae<br />
Orange oil 8008-52-9 8028-48-6 232-433-8<br />
Citrus sinensis—Rutaceae<br />
Peppermint oil 8006-90-4 98306-02-6 308-770-2<br />
Mentha piperita L.—Lamiaceae<br />
Manuka oil tairawhiti — 223749-44-8 425-630-7<br />
Leptospermum scoparium—Myrtaceae<br />
(ELINCS)<br />
Due to the lack <strong>of</strong> rules for an uniform classification <strong>of</strong> UVCBs (as an example the correct identification<br />
<strong>of</strong> the botanical origin <strong>of</strong> an essential oil), it happened that against the principles <strong>of</strong> the<br />
CAS organization in some cases several CAS numbers had been allocated to essential oils <strong>of</strong> the<br />
same denomination <strong>and</strong> in addition:<br />
– An older CAS number allocated for an (earlier) registration <strong>of</strong> the product in the USA.<br />
– A new CAS number allocated for registration in the EC for EINECS/ELINCS, respectively.<br />
Once again, a CAS number does not mean that the product is registered in the European<br />
EINECS—the CAS number is just an identification number <strong>of</strong> a chemical substance allotted upon<br />
request by the (private) CAS organization.<br />
Table 21.1 is exemplifying the allocation <strong>of</strong> several CAS numbers for the same essential oils but<br />
in connection with EINECS only the CAS number (EINECS) is <strong>of</strong> relevance.<br />
Manuka Oil from New Zeal<strong>and</strong> is the first (<strong>and</strong> only) essential oil that had to be notified for ELINCS<br />
as a new chemical substance after the Council Directive 79/831/EEC became effective on September 18,<br />
1981 (Dueshop, 2007). It is quoted here only for the sake <strong>of</strong> completeness <strong>and</strong> curiosity.<br />
This brief reflection on the background <strong>of</strong> EINECS <strong>and</strong> ELINCS is made as an introduction <strong>of</strong><br />
the actual situation with regard to safety requirements <strong>and</strong> to alert new players in the field <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oils to make sure that before intending to place a fragrance or flavor raw material on the European<br />
market they check whether or not this product is listed in EINECS or ELINCS respectively or is<br />
marketed in compliance with the Regulations <strong>of</strong> REACH for new substances. Placing <strong>of</strong> chemical<br />
substances in the states <strong>of</strong> the EU that are not meeting these requirements is a breach <strong>of</strong> law that can<br />
even be prosecuted as an <strong>of</strong>fense with a penalty or a fine up to euros 100,000.<br />
21.3 DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES AND DANGEROUS GOODS<br />
There is a significant difference between the similar sounding words <strong>and</strong> regulations regarding<br />
DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES <strong>and</strong> DANGEROUS (HAZARDOUS) GOODS.<br />
Both regulations are targeted to protect humans <strong>and</strong> the environment, but the term “Dangerous<br />
Substance” refers to the risks connected with the properties <strong>of</strong> the substance, that is, the potential<br />
risk <strong>of</strong> a direct contact with the product during production, packaging, <strong>and</strong> use.
908 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Dangerous substance<br />
Dangerous good<br />
Production<br />
Packaging<br />
Storage<br />
Use (blending)<br />
Road<br />
Rail<br />
Ship<br />
Air<br />
H<strong>and</strong>ling<br />
Transport<br />
FIGURE 21.1 Interrelationship between dangerous substances <strong>and</strong> dangerous goods. (Friendly permission,<br />
Paul Kaders, Hamburg.)<br />
Dangerous Substances are chemicals that fall into the categories quoted in article 2 <strong>of</strong> the<br />
already mentioned Council Directive 79/831/EEC—the 6th amendment <strong>of</strong> Directive 67/548. They<br />
are categorized as<br />
Explosive<br />
Oxidizing<br />
Flammable (extremely flammable—highly flammable—flammable)<br />
Toxicity (very toxic—toxic—harmful)<br />
Corrosive (corrosive—irritant)<br />
Dangerous for the environment (ecotoxicity)<br />
Carcinogenic—teratogenic—mutagenic (CMR).<br />
To protect humans <strong>and</strong> the environment—but principally the workers using them—articles that<br />
fall in these categories have to be classified as “Dangerous Substances” <strong>and</strong> labeled as per the<br />
subsequent Dangerous Substances Directive.<br />
The term Dangerous Goods refer to dangerous substances properly packed <strong>and</strong> labeled for<br />
storage <strong>and</strong> transport by road, rail, sea, or air (Figure 21.1).<br />
As per the rules <strong>and</strong> recommendations developed by a UN Committee <strong>of</strong> Experts regarding the<br />
transport <strong>of</strong> dangerous goods or substances they are defined as articles or substances that are capable<br />
<strong>of</strong> posing a risk to health, safety, property, or the environment.<br />
Dangerous goods are classified into the following groups (classes <strong>of</strong> relevance for essential oils<br />
have been marked in bold font):<br />
Class 1: Explosives<br />
Class 2: Gases<br />
Class 3: Flammable liquids<br />
Class 4: Flammable solids<br />
Class 5: Oxidizing substances <strong>and</strong> organic peroxides<br />
Class 6: Toxic <strong>and</strong> infectious substances—eventually “poison”<br />
Class 7: Radioactive material<br />
Class 8: Corrosives<br />
Class 9: Miscellaneous dangerous goods.<br />
21.4 PACKAGING OF DANGEROUS GOODS<br />
Dangerous goods must be transported in UN-approved packaging, which has been tested for sufficient<br />
stability <strong>and</strong> graded in the packing groups (PGs) I, II, <strong>and</strong> III.<br />
PG III (low risk)—Suitable for dangerous goods having a low-risk classification only.<br />
PG III corresponds to the UN packing code “Z”
Storage <strong>and</strong> Transport <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 909<br />
PG II (medium risk)—This type <strong>of</strong> packing matches the requirements for most <strong>of</strong> the essential<br />
oils.<br />
PG II corresponds to UN packing code “Y”—PG II includes PG III.<br />
PG I (high risk) corresponds to UN packing code “X”.<br />
PG I includes PG II <strong>and</strong> III—this type <strong>of</strong> packing has the highest stability.<br />
All dangerous goods have to be packed in the so-called UN-approved packing.<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils that are classified as dangerous goods <strong>and</strong> shipped in bulk, that is, drum lots for<br />
example, will only be accepted for transport if they are packed in UN-approved iron drums. These<br />
drums with a bunghole for example bear the following UN code:<br />
UN 1A1/Y/1.4/150/(06)/(NL)/(VL824)<br />
This specification reveals the following details:<br />
1A1<br />
Steel drum—nonremovable head<br />
Y<br />
PG II<br />
1.4 Maximum relative density at which the packing has been tested<br />
150 Test pressure<br />
(0.6) Year <strong>of</strong> manufacture<br />
(NL)<br />
State (country)<br />
(VL 123)<br />
Code number <strong>of</strong> manufacturer<br />
The potential risks <strong>of</strong> dangerous substances or goods respectively have to be declared in the<br />
relevant transport documentation. In addition to this information, also warning labels have to be<br />
used on the packages to alert workers regarding the nature <strong>of</strong> the goods they are h<strong>and</strong>ling.<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> dangerous goods regulations is not only to protect persons occupied with the conveyance<br />
<strong>of</strong> dangerous substances but to also serve, for example, fire brigades, who in case <strong>of</strong> an accident<br />
or fire are called <strong>and</strong> have to be aware <strong>of</strong> the risks.<br />
In this connection, a few words are due on the so-called UN/ID numbers for dangerous goods. These<br />
UN numbers are assigned to dangerous goods according to their hazard classification <strong>and</strong> composition.<br />
These UN (hazard identification) numbers should not be confused with the number <strong>of</strong> UN packaging.<br />
UN numbers are listed in all regulations for transport <strong>of</strong> dangerous goods <strong>and</strong> are identical for<br />
all types <strong>of</strong> transport.<br />
Approximately 170 essential oils have to be classified as dangerous substances/goods. According<br />
to their composition, the following UN numbers have been assigned to these oils:<br />
65 UN no. 1169—extracts, aromatic, <strong>and</strong> liquid<br />
52 UN no. 3082—environmentally hazardous substance, liquid, n.o.s.<br />
14 UN no. 1272—pine oil(s)<br />
6 UN no. 1992—flammable liquid, toxic, n.o.s.<br />
6 UN no. 2810—toxic liquid organic n.o.s.<br />
5 UN no. 2319—terpene hydrocarbons<br />
<strong>and</strong> others are distributed among the UN nos. 2811 (3), 2924 (3), 1545 (2), 1130 (1), 1197 (1), 1201<br />
(1), 1299 (1), 1990 (1), <strong>and</strong> 3077 (1).<br />
Details can be found in EFFA’s Code <strong>of</strong> Practice (CoP, 2008, et seq.), which is described later on.<br />
Consignments <strong>of</strong> dangerous substances (<strong>and</strong> dangerous goods respectively) must be accompanied<br />
by a so-called Material Safety Data Sheet. For this purpose, the International St<strong>and</strong>ard
910 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Organization (ISO) has developed a st<strong>and</strong>ard form that—divided into 16 headings—provides basically<br />
information on<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the supplier<br />
Name <strong>and</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> the substance/preparation<br />
Composition/components <strong>of</strong> the article<br />
Hazard identification<br />
First aid measures<br />
Fire fighting measures<br />
Accidental release measures<br />
Ecological information<br />
Transport information<br />
Regulatory information <strong>and</strong> so on<br />
to inform users <strong>and</strong> forwarders about the risks in connection with the chemical substance.<br />
Not only producers but also suppliers have the responsibility that the MSDS Form (material<br />
safety datasheet) is properly completed.<br />
21.5 LABELING<br />
IFRA <strong>and</strong> IOFI have regularly informed their members as well as stakeholders in the industry <strong>and</strong><br />
trade for more than five decades about potential health risks that have been assessed for natural <strong>and</strong><br />
synthetic raw materials used in flavors <strong>and</strong> fragrances in research <strong>and</strong> tests.<br />
Since a couple <strong>of</strong> years ago, the European Association <strong>of</strong> the Flavour <strong>and</strong> Fragrance Industry in<br />
Europe (EFFA) has been publishing a Code <strong>of</strong> Practice (CoP, 2008) with recommendations regarding<br />
a proper classification <strong>and</strong> labeling <strong>of</strong> aromatic chemicals <strong>and</strong> essential oils.<br />
This “CoP” is complementing the information <strong>of</strong> IFRA <strong>and</strong> IOFI. It is continuously updated by<br />
experts <strong>of</strong> the industry <strong>and</strong> the trade by the Hazard Communication Working Group (HCWG) <strong>and</strong><br />
furnishes for the disposal <strong>of</strong> people all over the world occupied in h<strong>and</strong>ling essential oils <strong>and</strong> aromatic<br />
chemicals; an up-to-date recommendation for a proper classification <strong>and</strong> labeling <strong>of</strong> hazardous<br />
fragrance <strong>and</strong> flavor raw materials (Protzen, 1989).<br />
The actual version <strong>of</strong> this CoP 2009 is available on the internet free <strong>of</strong> charge from the homepage<br />
<strong>of</strong> EFFA: http://www.effa.be/.<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> the compiled state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art expertise, EFFA’s CoP has almost obtained in practice<br />
the quality <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>ficial documentation. Therefore not only the trade but also the port <strong>and</strong> transport<br />
authorities who are in charge <strong>of</strong> controlling the compliance <strong>of</strong> safety regulations for transport <strong>of</strong><br />
dangerous goods are today referring to this guideline (Protzen, 1998).<br />
For approximately. 1200 aromatic chemicals used in the flavor <strong>and</strong> fragrance industry <strong>and</strong> 220<br />
commercially used essential oils as well as information on 60 natural extracts like absolutes <strong>and</strong><br />
resinoids, the CoP contains a guideline detailing information on<br />
EC registration number<br />
CAS number relevant in the EC/EU<br />
CAS number relevant in the USA<br />
Commercial name<br />
Content <strong>of</strong> hydrocarbons (%)<br />
Warning labels<br />
UN Transport Regulations (dangerous goods class, required class <strong>of</strong> packing group class,<br />
appropriate UN number)
Storage <strong>and</strong> Transport <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 911<br />
R (Risk) phrases<br />
S (Safety) phrases.<br />
Before the Council Directive 79/831/EEC was issued, flammability <strong>of</strong> essential oils was considered<br />
the main danger emanating from these articles. Today’s knowledge <strong>of</strong> potential risks <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oils is extended. As a precaution very rigid safety regulations that consider extreme conditions<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten exceeding empirical <strong>and</strong> practical experience require that from the 220 essential oils listed in<br />
the CoP 2008, approximately 70%, that is, 170 essential oils, are classified as dangerous Substances<br />
<strong>and</strong> therefore must be labeled accordingly for storage, use, <strong>and</strong> transport, as for example:<br />
Xn<br />
N<br />
Xi<br />
Gesundheitsschãdlich<br />
Harmful<br />
Umweltgefãhrlich<br />
Dangerous for the<br />
environment<br />
Reizend<br />
Irritant<br />
The following warning labels cover the majority <strong>of</strong> risks:<br />
190 Xn Harmful—a St. Andrew’s Cross (Xn)<br />
174 N Dangerous for the environment<br />
60 Xi Irritant—a St. Andrew’s Cross (Xi)<br />
12 T Toxic—a skull <strong>and</strong> cross-bones (T)<br />
3 C Corrosive—the symbol showing the damaging effect <strong>of</strong> an acid<br />
In addition to this information also R-phases <strong>and</strong> R labels must be used on the packaging. A list<br />
that explains the meaning <strong>of</strong> R + S phrases required for labeling essential oils as per the CoP is<br />
enclosed for further perusal.<br />
A statistical evaluation <strong>of</strong> the R (Risk) labels to be used is shown in the following differentiation<br />
to have a better <strong>and</strong> detailed idea <strong>of</strong> the potential risks:<br />
205 R-43 May cause sensation by skin contact<br />
158 R-65 Harmful—may cause lung damage if swallowed<br />
103 R-51/53 Toxic to aquatic organisms—may cause long-term adverse<br />
effects on the aquatic environment<br />
95 R-38 Harmful if swallowed<br />
88 R-50/53 Very toxic to aquatic organisms—may cause long-term<br />
adverse effects on the aquatic environment<br />
80 R-10 Flammable<br />
40 R-52/53 Harmful to aquatic organisms—may cause long-term adverse<br />
effects on the aquatic environment<br />
38 R-22 Harmful if swallowed.
912 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Flammability as a major risk <strong>of</strong> essential oils is today outnumbered by the potential risks emanating<br />
from these concentrated fragrances <strong>and</strong> flavors causing harm to the skin, to the health risk if<br />
swallowed, <strong>and</strong> their ecotoxicity.<br />
The cumulative frequency <strong>of</strong> occurrence reveals that the majority <strong>of</strong> essential oils have to be<br />
h<strong>and</strong>led with care <strong>and</strong> workers should use a protection particularly when a contact <strong>of</strong> these concentrated<br />
volatile natural fragrance <strong>and</strong> flavor materials with the skin is possible.<br />
Special care <strong>and</strong> attention should be given when h<strong>and</strong>ling essential oils labeled with<br />
R-50/53 Very toxic to aquatic organisms—may cause long-term adverse effects<br />
on the aquatic environment<br />
R-34 Causes burns (oils containing thymol)<br />
R-45 May cause cancer (oils containing safrol)<br />
R-68 Possible risk <strong>of</strong> irreversible effects<br />
Safety starts at the point <strong>of</strong> production but in the chain <strong>of</strong> supply each party involved is directly<br />
responsible for proper h<strong>and</strong>ling, that is, declaration <strong>and</strong> labeling <strong>of</strong> goods. In Europe, a special<br />
transport police is in the ports <strong>and</strong> on the roads intensifying the controls for correct declaration,<br />
packaging <strong>and</strong> labeling <strong>of</strong> dangerous goods <strong>and</strong> heavy fines are imposed:<br />
Risk phrases applicable for storage <strong>and</strong> transport <strong>of</strong> essential oil—data as per EFFA CoP 2008:<br />
R-10 Flammable<br />
R-20 Harmful by inhalation<br />
R-21 Harmful in contact with the skin<br />
R-22 Harmful if swallowed<br />
R-23 Toxic by inhalation<br />
R-24 Toxic in contact with the skin<br />
R-25 Toxic if swallowed<br />
R-26 Very toxic by inhalation<br />
R-27 Very toxic in contact with the skin<br />
R-34 Causes burns<br />
R-36 Irritating to eyes<br />
R-37 Irritating to the respiratory system<br />
R-38 Irritating to the skin<br />
R-41 Risk <strong>of</strong> serious damage to eyes<br />
R-43 May cause sensation by skin contact<br />
R-45 May cause cancer<br />
R-65 Harmful—may cause lung damage if swallowed<br />
R-66 Repeated exposure may cause skin dryness or cracking<br />
R-68 Possible risk <strong>of</strong> irreversible effects<br />
R-21/22 Harmful in contact with skin <strong>and</strong> if swallowed<br />
R-36/38 Irritating to eyes <strong>and</strong> skin<br />
R-50/53 Very toxic to aquatic organisms—may cause long-term adverse effects on the<br />
aquatic environment<br />
R-51/53 Toxic to aquatic organisms—may cause long-term adverse effects on the<br />
aquatic environment<br />
R-52/53 Harmful to aquatic organisms—may cause long-term adverse effects on the<br />
aquatic environment<br />
R-68/22 Harmful—possible risk <strong>of</strong> irreversible effects if swallowed
Storage <strong>and</strong> Transport <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 913<br />
21.6 LIST OF REGULATIONS FOR THE CONSIDERATION<br />
OF DOING BUSINESS IN THE EU<br />
• Council Directive 79/831/EEC <strong>of</strong> 18 September 1979 amending for the sixth time Directive<br />
67/548/EEC on the approximation <strong>of</strong> the laws, regulations <strong>and</strong> administrative provisions<br />
relating to the classification, packaging <strong>and</strong> labelling <strong>of</strong> dangerous substances<br />
OJ L 259, 15.10.1979, p. 10–28 (DA, DE, EN, FR, IT, NL)<br />
• Directive 1999/45/EC <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> 31 May 1999<br />
concerning the approximation <strong>of</strong> the laws, regulations <strong>and</strong> administrative provisions <strong>of</strong><br />
the Member States relating to the classification, packaging <strong>and</strong> labelling <strong>of</strong> dangerous<br />
preparations<br />
OJ L 200, 30.7.1999, p. 1–68 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)<br />
• Council Directive 88/388/EEC <strong>of</strong> 22 June 1988 on the approximation <strong>of</strong> the laws <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Member States relating to flavourings for use in foodstuffs <strong>and</strong> to source materials for their<br />
production<br />
OJ L 184, 15.7.1988, p. 61–66 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT)<br />
• Regulation (EC) No 258/97 <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> 27 January<br />
1997 concerning novel foods <strong>and</strong> novel food ingredients<br />
OJ L 43, 14.2.1997, p. 1–6 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)<br />
• Directive 2000/13/EC <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> 20 March 2000<br />
on the approximation <strong>of</strong> the laws <strong>of</strong> the Member States relating to the labelling, presentation<br />
<strong>and</strong> advertising <strong>of</strong> foodstuffs<br />
OJ L 109, 6.5.2000, p. 29–42 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)<br />
• Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> 28<br />
January 2002 laying down the general principles <strong>and</strong> requirements <strong>of</strong> food law, establishing<br />
the European Food Safety Authority <strong>and</strong> laying down procedures in matters <strong>of</strong><br />
food safety<br />
OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, p. 1–24 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)<br />
• Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong><br />
23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels <strong>of</strong> pesticides in or on food <strong>and</strong> feed <strong>of</strong><br />
plant <strong>and</strong> animal origin <strong>and</strong> amending Council Directive 91/414/EECText with EEA<br />
relevance.<br />
OJ L 70, 16.3.2005, p. 1–16 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL,<br />
PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)<br />
• Regulation (EC) No 648/2004 <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> 31 March<br />
2004 on detergents (Text with EEA relevance)<br />
OJ L 104, 8.4.2004, p. 1–35 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)<br />
• Directive 98/8/EC <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> 16 February 1998<br />
concerning the placing <strong>of</strong> biocidal products on the market<br />
OJ L 123, 24.4.1998, p. 1–63 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)<br />
• Council Directive 67/548/EEC <strong>of</strong> 27 June 1967 on the approximation <strong>of</strong> laws, regulations<br />
<strong>and</strong> administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging <strong>and</strong> labelling <strong>of</strong> dangerous<br />
substances<br />
OJ 196, 16.8.1967, p. 1–98 (DE, FR, IT, NL) English special edition: Series I Chapter 1967<br />
P. 0234<br />
• Council Directive 76/768/EEC <strong>of</strong> 27 July 1976 on the approximation <strong>of</strong> the laws <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Member States relating to cosmetic products<br />
(OJ L 262, 27.9.1976, p. 169)<br />
For amendments see Table 21.2.
914 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 21.2<br />
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE<br />
<strong>of</strong> 27 July 1976<br />
on the approximation <strong>of</strong> the laws <strong>of</strong> the Member States relating to cosmetic products<br />
(76/768/EEC)<br />
(OJ L 262, 27.9.1976, p. 169)<br />
Official Journal<br />
Amended by No Page Date<br />
M1 Council Directive 79/661/EEC <strong>of</strong> 24 July 1979 L 192 35 31.7.1979<br />
M2 Commission Directive 82/147/EEC <strong>of</strong> 11 February 1982 L 63 26 6.3.1982<br />
M3 Council Directive 82/368/EEC <strong>of</strong> 17 May 1982 L 167 1 15.6.1982<br />
M4 Commission Directive 83/191/EEC <strong>of</strong> 30 March 1983 L 109 25 26.4.1983<br />
M5 Commission Directive 83/341/EEC <strong>of</strong> 29 June 1983 L 188 15 13.7.1983<br />
M6 Commission Directive 83/496/EEC <strong>of</strong> 22 September 1983 L 275 20 8.10.1983<br />
M7 Council Directive 83/574/EEC <strong>of</strong> 26 October 1983 L 332 38 28.11.1983<br />
M8 Commission Directive 84/415/EEC <strong>of</strong> 18 July 1984 L 228 31 25.8.1984<br />
M9 Commission Directive 85/391/EEC <strong>of</strong> 16 July 1985 L 224 40 22.8.1985<br />
M10 Commission Directive 86/179/EEC <strong>of</strong> 28 February 1986 L 138 40 24.5.1986<br />
M11 Commission Directive 86/199/EEC <strong>of</strong> 26 March 1986 L 149 38 3.6.1986<br />
M12 Commission Directive 87/137/EEC <strong>of</strong> 2 February 1987 L 56 20 26.2.1987<br />
M13 Commission Directive 88/233/EEC <strong>of</strong> 2 March 1988 L 105 11 26.4.1988<br />
M14 Council Directive 88/667/EEC <strong>of</strong> 21 December 1988 L 382 46 31.12.1988<br />
M15 Commission Directive 89/174/EEC <strong>of</strong> 21 February 1989 L 64 10 8.3.1989<br />
M16 Council Directive 89/679/EEC <strong>of</strong> 21 December 1989 L 398 25 30.12.1989<br />
M17 Commission Directive 90/121/EEC <strong>of</strong> 20 February 1990 L 71 40 17.3.1990<br />
M18 Commission Directive 91/184/EEC <strong>of</strong> 12 March 1991 L 91 59 12.4.1991<br />
M19 Commission Directive 92/8/EEC <strong>of</strong> 18 February 1992 L 70 23 17.3.1992<br />
M20 Commission Directive 92/86/EEC <strong>of</strong> 21 October 1992 L 325 18 11.11.1992<br />
M21 Council Directive 93/35/EEC <strong>of</strong> 14 June 1993 L 151 32 23.6.1993<br />
M22 Commission Directive 93/47/EEC <strong>of</strong> 22 June 1993 L 203 24 13.8.1993<br />
M23 Commission Directive 94/32/EC <strong>of</strong> 29 June 1994 L 181 31 15.7.1994<br />
M24 Commission Directive 95/34/EC <strong>of</strong> 10 July 1995 L 167 19 18.7.1995<br />
M25 Commission Directive 96/41/EC <strong>of</strong> 25 June 1996 L 198 36 8.8.1996<br />
M26 Commission Directive 97/1/EC <strong>of</strong> 10 January 1997 L 16 85 18.1.1997<br />
M27 Commission Directive 97/18/EC <strong>of</strong> 17 April l997 L 114 43 1.5.1997<br />
M28 Commission Directive 97/45/EC <strong>of</strong> 14 July 1997 L 196 77 24.7.1997<br />
M29 Commission Directive 98/16/EC <strong>of</strong> 5 March 1998 L 77 44 14.3.1998<br />
M30 Commission Directive 98/62/EC <strong>of</strong> 3 September 1998 L 253 20 15.9.1998<br />
M31 Commission Directive 2000/6/EC <strong>of</strong> 29 February 2000 L 56 42 1.3.2000<br />
M32 Commission Directive 2000/11/EC <strong>of</strong> 10 March 2000 L 65 22 14.3.2000<br />
M33 Commission Directive 2000/41/EC <strong>of</strong> 19 June 2000 L 145 25 20.6.2000<br />
M34 Commission Directive 2002/34/EC <strong>of</strong> 15 April 2002 L 102 19 18.4.2002<br />
M35 Commission Directive 2003/1/EC <strong>of</strong> 6 January 2003 L 5 14 10.1.2003<br />
M36 Commission Directive 2003/16/EC <strong>of</strong> 19 February 2003 L 46 24 20.2.2003<br />
M37 Directive 2003/15/EC <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Council L 66 26 11.3.2003<br />
<strong>of</strong> 27 February 2003<br />
M38 Commission Directive 2003/80/EC <strong>of</strong> 5 September 2003 L 224 27 6.9.2003<br />
continued
Storage <strong>and</strong> Transport <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> 915<br />
TABLE 21.2 (continued)<br />
Official Journal<br />
Amended by No Page Date<br />
M39 Commission Directive 2003/83/EC <strong>of</strong> 24 September 2003 L 238 23 25.9.2003<br />
M40 Commission Directive 2004/87/EC <strong>of</strong> 7 September 2004 L 287 4 8.9.2004<br />
M41 Commission Directive 2004/88/EC <strong>of</strong> 7 September 2004 L 287 5 8.9.2004<br />
M42 Commission Directive 2004/94/EC <strong>of</strong> 15 September 2004 L 294 28 17.9.2004<br />
M43 Commission Directive 2004/93/EC <strong>of</strong> 21 September 2004 L 300 13 25.9.2004<br />
M44 Commission Directive 2005/9/EC <strong>of</strong> 28 January 2005 L 27 46 29.1.2005<br />
M45 Commission Directive 2005/42/EC <strong>of</strong> 20 June 2005 L 158 17 21.6.2005<br />
M46 Commission Directive 2005/52/EC <strong>of</strong> 9 September 2005 L 234 9 10.9.2005<br />
M47 Commission Directive 2005/80/EC <strong>of</strong> 21 November 2005 L 303 32 22.11.2005<br />
M48 Commission Directive 2006/65/EC <strong>of</strong> 19 July 2006 L 198 11 20.7.2006<br />
M49 Commission Directive 2006/78/EC <strong>of</strong> 29 September 2006 L 271 56 30.9.2006<br />
M50 Commission Directive 2007/1/EC <strong>of</strong> 29 January 2007 L 25 9 1.2.2007<br />
M51 Commission Directive 2007/17/EC <strong>of</strong> 22 March 2007 L 82 27 23.3.2007<br />
M52 Commission Directive 2007/22/EC <strong>of</strong> 17 April 2007 L 101 11 18.4.2007<br />
M53 Commission Directive 2007/53/EC <strong>of</strong> 29 August 2007 L 226 19 30.8.2007<br />
M54 Commission Directive 2007/54/EC <strong>of</strong> 29 August 2007 L 226 21 30.8.2007<br />
M55 Commission Directive 2007/67/EC <strong>of</strong> 22 November 2007 L 305 22 23.11.2007<br />
M56 Commission Directive 2008/14/EC <strong>of</strong> 15 February 2008 L 42 43 16.2.2008<br />
M57 Commission Directive 2008/42/EC <strong>of</strong> 3 April 2008 L 93 13 4.4.2008<br />
M58 Commission Directive 2008/88/EC <strong>of</strong> 23 September 2008 L 256 12 24.9.2008<br />
M59 Commission Directive 2008/123/EC <strong>of</strong> 18 December 2008 L 340 71 19.12.2008<br />
M60 Directive 2008/112/EC <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Council L 345 68 23.12.2008<br />
<strong>of</strong> 16 December 2008<br />
M61 Commission Directive 2009/6/EC <strong>of</strong> 4 February 2009 L 36 15 5.2.2009<br />
Amended by<br />
A1 Act <strong>of</strong> Accession <strong>of</strong> Greece L 291 17 19.11.1979<br />
A2 Act <strong>of</strong> Accession <strong>of</strong> Spain <strong>and</strong> Portugal L 302 23 15.11.1985<br />
Corrected by<br />
C1<br />
C2<br />
C3<br />
C4<br />
C5<br />
C6<br />
C7<br />
C8<br />
C9<br />
C10<br />
Corrigendum, OJ L 255, 25.9.1984, p. 28 (84/415/EEC)<br />
Corrigendum, OJ L 157, 24.6.1988, p. 38 (88/233/EEC)<br />
Corrigendum, OJ L 199, 13.7.1989, p. 23 (89/174/EEC)<br />
Corrigendum, OJ L 273, 25.10.1994, p. 38 (94/32/EC)<br />
Corrigendum, OJ L 341, 17.12.2002, p. 71 (2002/34/EC)<br />
Corrigendum, OJ L 151, 19.6.2003, p. 44 (2002/34/EC)<br />
Corrigendum, OJ L 58, 26.2.2004, p. 28 (2003/83/EC)<br />
Corrigendum, OJ L 97, 15.4.2005, p. 63 (2004/93/EC)<br />
Corrigendum, OJ L 258, 4.10.2007, p. 44 (2007/54/EC)<br />
Corrigendum, OJ L 136, 24.5.2008, p. 52 (2008/42/EC)<br />
REFERENCES<br />
EFFA Code <strong>of</strong> Practice 2008, 2008. The European Flavour & Fragrance Association. Accessed October 2008<br />
from http://www.effa.be/<br />
Dueshop, L., 2007. Personal communications.
916 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Dueshop, L., 2008. Personal communications.<br />
Protzen, K-D., 1989. Guideline for Classifi cation <strong>and</strong> Labelling <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> for Transport <strong>and</strong> H<strong>and</strong>ling<br />
distributed during IFEAT CONFERENCE, London.<br />
Protzen, K-D., 1998. Transportation/Safety Regulations Update, International Conference on <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> Aromas, November 8–12, 1998, London.
22<br />
Recent EU Legislation on<br />
Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances <strong>and</strong><br />
Its Impact on <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Jan C.R. Demyttenaere<br />
CONTENTS<br />
22.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 917<br />
22.2 Cosmetic <strong>and</strong> Detergent Legislation <strong>and</strong> Allergen Labeling ...................................... 918<br />
22.2.1 History <strong>and</strong> Background ................................................................................ 918<br />
22.2.2 Cosmetic Directive <strong>and</strong> its Seventh Amendment ........................................... 920<br />
22.2.3 Impact on Extracts <strong>and</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> <strong>and</strong> Aromatic Natural<br />
Raw Materials ............................................................................................... 921<br />
22.2.4 Recent Data on Sensitization to Fragrances .................................................. 922<br />
22.2.5 First Amendment <strong>of</strong> the Detergent Regulation <strong>and</strong> Allergen Labeling .......... 925<br />
22.3 Current Flavouring Directive <strong>and</strong> Future Flavouring Regulation: Impact on<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> ............................................................................................................ 926<br />
22.3.1 Current Flavouring Directive 88/388/EC ...................................................... 927<br />
22.3.1.1 Maximum Levels <strong>of</strong> “Biologically Active Substances” .................. 927<br />
22.3.1.2 Definition <strong>of</strong> “Natural” ................................................................... 927<br />
22.3.2 Future Flavouring Regulation ....................................................................... 928<br />
22.3.2.1 Maximum Levels <strong>of</strong> “Biologically Active Substances” .................. 929<br />
22.3.2.2 Definition <strong>of</strong> “Natural” ................................................................... 933<br />
22.4 Hazard Classification <strong>and</strong> Labeling <strong>of</strong> Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances ................................ 935<br />
22.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 939<br />
References ......................................................................................................................... 947<br />
22.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
In the last years, several new European Regulations <strong>and</strong> Directives have been adopted or announced<br />
in relation to flavors <strong>and</strong> fragrances. As essential oils <strong>and</strong> extracts are very important ingredients for<br />
flavoring <strong>and</strong> fragrance applications, these new regulations will have a major impact on the trade<br />
<strong>and</strong> use in commerce <strong>of</strong> these essential oils <strong>and</strong> extracts.<br />
This chapter will focus on some pieces <strong>of</strong> legislation that are <strong>of</strong> major importance for the Flavour<br />
<strong>and</strong> Fragrance (F&F) Industry, such as the Cosmetic Directive 76/768/EC <strong>and</strong> especially its Seventh<br />
Amendment (2003/15/EC) <strong>and</strong> the first amendment <strong>of</strong> the Detergent Regulation (June 2006), which<br />
make the labeling <strong>of</strong> 26 specific fragrance ingredients (the so-called 26 “alleged” allergens)<br />
m<strong>and</strong>atory: the presence <strong>of</strong> these materials above the given threshold has to be declared irrespective<br />
<strong>of</strong> the way they are added (as such or as being part <strong>of</strong> “complex ingredients” such as extracts <strong>and</strong><br />
essential oils).<br />
917
918 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Some attention will be paid to the new Flavouring Regulation (part <strong>of</strong> the so-called Food<br />
Improvement Agents Package) that will replace the current Flavouring Directive 88/388/EEC <strong>and</strong><br />
that is currently under discussion at the EU Commission, EU Parliament <strong>and</strong> Council levels.<br />
Also the issue <strong>of</strong> hazard classification <strong>and</strong> labeling <strong>of</strong> dangerous substances <strong>and</strong> preparations,<br />
<strong>and</strong> essential oils containing hazardous components will be addressed <strong>and</strong> some examples will be<br />
given. This relates to the recent publication <strong>of</strong> the Commission Directive 2006/8/EC amending the<br />
Dangerous Preparations Directive 1999/45/EC.<br />
22.2 COSMETIC AND DETERGENT LEGISLATION AND ALLERGEN LABELING<br />
22.2.1 HISTORY AND BACKGROUND<br />
In recent years (the late 1980s <strong>and</strong> 1990s), there has been a scientific debate on the safety <strong>of</strong> fragrance<br />
(perfumery) ingredients. Dermatologists have highlighted the risk <strong>of</strong> contact allergy from<br />
fragrance ingredients (Santussi et al., 1987; Becker et al., 1994), <strong>and</strong> actions to prevent the disease<br />
have been requested (Frosch et al., 1995; Larsen et al., 1996; SCCNFP 0017/98).<br />
As a result <strong>of</strong> this <strong>and</strong> in response to a question from a Member State (MS) <strong>and</strong> members <strong>of</strong> the<br />
European parliament, the Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products <strong>and</strong> Non-Food Products<br />
Intended for Consumers (SCCNFP) has been asked by DG Enterprise (EU Commission) to respond<br />
to the following m<strong>and</strong>ate in relation to the safety <strong>of</strong> fragrance ingredients <strong>and</strong> to answer (among<br />
others) the following questions:<br />
• It is proposed that all known fragrance allergens are labeled on cosmetics if used in the<br />
products. Does the SCCNFP agree to this proposal? If so,<br />
– Which chemicals fall under this classification?<br />
– Is there a maximum concentration <strong>of</strong> each chemical permissible without the requirement<br />
for labeling?<br />
• Restrictions are proposed for the three most common fragrance allergens (cinnamic aldehyde,<br />
isoeugenol, <strong>and</strong> hydroxycitronellal). Does the SCCNFP agree to restriction on the<br />
use <strong>of</strong> common fragrance allergens (Annex III listing)? If so<br />
– Which fragrance materials should be subject to restrictions?<br />
– What are the conditions for restrictions (maximum concentration, fields <strong>of</strong> applications,<br />
etc.)?<br />
Other questions were related to industry-restricted <strong>and</strong> industry-prohibited substances.<br />
In its Interim position on Fragrance allergy SCCNFP/0202/99 adopted at the SCCNFP session<br />
<strong>of</strong> June 23, 1999, the SCCNFP already stated: “Contact allergy to fragrance substances is an important<br />
clinical problem. Up to 10% <strong>of</strong> individuals with eczema are allergic to fragrance substances <strong>and</strong><br />
possibly 1–2% <strong>of</strong> the general population.”<br />
In the same Interim position, SCCNFP considered that the m<strong>and</strong>ate from the European Commission<br />
could be usefully divided into the following two sections:<br />
1. Identification <strong>of</strong> those fragrance ingredients that are <strong>of</strong> concern as allergens for the<br />
consumer. Recommendations on informing the consumer <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> important<br />
allergens to permit the consumer with a known fragrance allergy as a means to avoid contact<br />
with an allergen. An opinion as to whether such an identification can be related to<br />
concentrations present in a product when elicitation levels are known.<br />
2. An opinion on the adoption <strong>of</strong> industry-prohibited substances into Annex 2 <strong>and</strong> adoption<br />
<strong>of</strong> industry-restricted substances into Annex 3. Consideration as to whether the concentration<br />
limits or other restrictions suggested by industry can be supported or need to be<br />
changed if there is such an inclusion in Annex 22.3. Whether there are additional substances<br />
that should be subject to inclusion in an annex.
Recent EU Legislation on Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances 919<br />
Taking into account the importance <strong>and</strong> enormity <strong>of</strong> the m<strong>and</strong>ate, it was concluded that the first<br />
section should be considered initially.<br />
As a result, the SCCNFP published, as a follow-up to the Interim position, its opinion<br />
SCCNFP/0017/98 (adopted by the SCCNFP during the plenary session <strong>of</strong> December 8, 1999)<br />
entitled “Fragrance allergy in consumers—A review <strong>of</strong> the problem: Analysis <strong>of</strong> the need for appropriate<br />
consumer information <strong>and</strong> Identification <strong>of</strong> consumer allergens.”<br />
This opinion relates to the first section mentioned above <strong>and</strong> consists <strong>of</strong><br />
– A critical review <strong>of</strong> the problem <strong>of</strong> fragrance allergy in consumers.<br />
– Identification <strong>of</strong> those fragrance ingredients that are well recognized as consumer<br />
allergens.<br />
– An opinion as to whether such identification can be related to concentrations present in a<br />
product when elicitation levels are known.<br />
Allergy to natural ingredients (such as oakmoss) was not addressed in this opinion but was<br />
analyzed separately (see SCCNFP opinion <strong>of</strong> October 24, 2000).<br />
It was the opinion <strong>of</strong> the SCCNFP that<br />
– Fragrance ingredients have to be considered as an important cause <strong>of</strong> contact allergy.<br />
– Based on criteria restricted to dermatological data reflecting the clinical experience, it was<br />
possible to identify 24 fragrance ingredients, which correspond to the most frequently<br />
recognized allergens. Thirteen <strong>of</strong> these have been reported more frequently; these are<br />
well-recognized contact allergens in consumers <strong>and</strong> are thus <strong>of</strong> most concern; 11 others are<br />
less well documented.<br />
In the opinion (SCCNFP/0017/98), two lists were given: a List A with 13 fragrance chemicals,<br />
which according to existing knowledge, are most frequently reported <strong>and</strong> well-recognized consumer<br />
allergens, <strong>and</strong> a List B with 11 fragrance chemicals, which are less frequently reported <strong>and</strong><br />
thus less documented as consumer allergens.<br />
Tables 22.1 <strong>and</strong> 22.2 review the substances <strong>of</strong> Lists A <strong>and</strong> B.<br />
In addition, the SCCNFP stated in its opinion that information should be provided to consumers<br />
about the known presence in cosmetic products <strong>of</strong> fragrance ingredients with a well-recognized<br />
potential to cause contact allergy: “Information regarding these fragrance chemicals should be<br />
given to consumers if deliberately added to a fragrance formulation either in the form <strong>of</strong> a chemical<br />
or as an identified constituent <strong>of</strong> an ingredient.”<br />
TABLE 22.1<br />
List A (SCCNFP/0017/98)—13 Most Frequently Reported Allergens (CAS No.)<br />
Amyl cinnamal (122-40-7) Amylcinnamyl alcohol (101-85-9)<br />
Benzyl alcohol (100-51-6) Benzyl salicylate (118-58-1)<br />
Cinnamyl alcohol (104-54-1) Cinnamal (104-55-2)<br />
Citral (5392-40-5) Coumarin (91-64-5)<br />
Eugenol (97-53-0) Geraniol (106-24-1)<br />
Hydroxycitronellal (107-75-5) Hydroxymethylpentylcyclohexene-carboxaldehyde (HMPCC) (31906-04-4)<br />
Isoeugenol (97-54-1)<br />
Note: Substances highlighted in bold are naturally occurring fragrance materials <strong>and</strong> the other substances are synthetic<br />
fragrance ingredients that are not known to occur in nature.
920 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 22.2<br />
List B (SCCNFP/0017/98)—11 Less Frequently Reported Allergens (CAS No.)<br />
Anisyl alcohol (105-13-5) Benzyl benzoate (120-51-4)<br />
Benzyl cinnamate (103-41-3) Citronellol (106-22-9)<br />
Farnesol (4602-84-0) Hexyl cinnamaldehyde (101-86-0)<br />
Lilial (80-54-6) d-Limonene (5989-27-5)<br />
Linalool (78-70-6) Methyl heptine carbonate (111-12-6)<br />
3-Methyl-4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1-yl)-3-buten-2-one (=alpha-iso-methylionone) (127-51-5)<br />
Note: Substances highlighted in bold are naturally occurring fragrance materials <strong>and</strong> the other substances are synthetic<br />
fragrance ingredients that are not known to occur in nature.<br />
Additionally, as mentioned above, also two natural ingredients, oakmoss <strong>and</strong> tree moss extracts,<br />
were addressed in a separate SCCNFP opinion (adopted during the 14th plenary meeting <strong>of</strong> October 24,<br />
2000).<br />
These two natural mosses are identified as follows: oakmoss extracts derived from the lichen,<br />
Evernia prunastri (L.) Arch. (Usneaceae), growing primarily on oak trees, <strong>and</strong> tree moss extracts<br />
derived from a mixture <strong>of</strong> lichens, mainly Evernia furfuracea (L.) Arch. (Usneaceae) growing on<br />
Pinus species.<br />
Oakmoss extract has CAS no. 90028-68-5 <strong>and</strong> EINECS no. 289-861-3.<br />
Tree moss extract has CAS no. 90028-67-4 <strong>and</strong> EINECS no. 289-860-8.<br />
The term “labeling” comes from the EU Commission (DG Enterprise) <strong>and</strong> whether a fragrance<br />
ingredient should be labeled or not is a Risk Manager’s decision. In its memor<strong>and</strong>um <strong>of</strong> 2001<br />
(SCCNFP/0450/01), the SCCNFP (being the Risk Assessor) clearly states that “because <strong>of</strong> the lack<br />
<strong>of</strong> dose/elicitation data for these substances, the SCCNFP has been unable to provide recommendations<br />
on levels above which the information to the consumer would be necessary.” Nevertheless,<br />
SCCNFP mentions in its memor<strong>and</strong>um that it is “aware that for practical risk management reasons<br />
there is a need for threshold levels for the provision <strong>of</strong> information.” There is a proposal that for<br />
leave-on products, this threshold level should be 10 ppm in the finished cosmetic product, whereas<br />
for rinse-<strong>of</strong>f products, the SCCNFP would consider a working level 10 times higher than that<br />
recommended for leave-on products to be reasonable, being 100 ppm.<br />
22.2.2 COSMETIC DIRECTIVE AND ITS SEVENTH AMENDMENT<br />
The EU Commission has implemented the above-mentioned SCCNFP opinions in the 7th Amendment<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Cosmetic Directive 76/768/EC (2003/15/EC) by adding the following restrictions [limitations<br />
<strong>and</strong> requirements (for labeling)] to 26 fragrance substances in Annex III, Part 1: “The<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> the substance must be indicated in the list <strong>of</strong> ingredients referred to in Article 6(1)(g)<br />
when its concentration exceeds 0.001% in leave-on products <strong>and</strong> 0.01% in rinse-<strong>of</strong>f products.”<br />
However, no further restrictions (such as maximum authorized concentrations in the finished<br />
cosmetic products), except the labeling requirements were introduced at that time.<br />
This means that the presence <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the 26 alleged allergens (sensitizers) must be indicated<br />
(labeled) in the list <strong>of</strong> ingredients on the packaging <strong>of</strong> the finished cosmetic products when its concentration<br />
exceeds 10 ppm (leave-on products) or 100 ppm (rinse-<strong>of</strong>f products), according to Art. 6.1(g) <strong>of</strong><br />
the Cosmetic Directive, 7th Amendment.<br />
However, it is important to note here that the Fragrance Industry is self-regulating by issuing the<br />
International Fragrance Association Code <strong>of</strong> Practice (IFRA CoP), which is published by the IFRA.<br />
This CoP consists <strong>of</strong> St<strong>and</strong>ards (the so-called IFRA St<strong>and</strong>ards) for the fragrance ingredients with<br />
certain restrictions/limitations <strong>and</strong> in some cases bans to which the International Fragrance Industry<br />
should comply. The last amendment <strong>of</strong> the IFRA CoP is the 44th Amendment. The IFRA CoP <strong>and</strong>
Recent EU Legislation on Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances 921<br />
its 44th Amendment <strong>and</strong> the IFRA St<strong>and</strong>ards can be found on the homepage <strong>of</strong> the International<br />
Fragrance Association: www.ifraorg.org.<br />
22.2.3 IMPACT ON EXTRACTS AND ESSENTIAL OILS AND AROMATIC NATURAL RAW MATERIALS<br />
The m<strong>and</strong>atory labeling requirement for the 26 alleged allergens is irrespective <strong>of</strong> the source <strong>of</strong> the<br />
allergen or the way by which it has been introduced in the final cosmetic product. In other words,<br />
the presence <strong>of</strong> these materials above the given threshold has to be declared irrespective <strong>of</strong> the way<br />
they are added (as such or as being part <strong>of</strong> “complex ingredients” such as extracts <strong>and</strong> essential oils).<br />
This means that the use <strong>of</strong> essential oils containing them in formulations may lead to the presence<br />
<strong>of</strong> such allergens <strong>and</strong> the labeling requirement will apply.<br />
Sixteen <strong>of</strong> the 24 alleged allergenic substances are naturally occurring (see substances indicated<br />
in bold in Tables 22.1 <strong>and</strong> 22.2), the other eight substances are synthetic fragrance ingredients that<br />
do not occur in nature as far as known.<br />
The structures <strong>of</strong> the 16 naturally occurring allergenic substances are depicted in Figures 22.1<br />
<strong>and</strong> 22.2.<br />
The remaining two alleged allergens are aromatic natural raw materials by themselves: oakmoss<br />
(E. prunastri) <strong>and</strong> tree moss (E. furfuracea).<br />
According to the current knowledge <strong>of</strong> the F&F Industry, these 16 allergens occur in about 180<br />
natural raw materials (extracts <strong>and</strong> essential oils) (EFFA CoP, 2007).<br />
A list <strong>of</strong> aromatic natural raw materials containing any <strong>of</strong> the 16 naturally occurring sensitizers<br />
<strong>and</strong> their presence (if >0.1%) or concentration can be found in Annex 22.1 to this chapter—this is<br />
based on earlier internal communication (2004) <strong>of</strong> the F&F industries related to a former version <strong>of</strong><br />
the EFFA CoP.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the key challenges for the Fragrance Industry is the analysis <strong>and</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> the 16<br />
naturally occurring allergens in the natural raw materials (extracts <strong>and</strong> essential oils) <strong>and</strong> fragrance<br />
compounds (mixtures <strong>and</strong> preparations). To address this work, the Fragrance Industry has established<br />
an Analytical Working Group <strong>of</strong> IFRA where methods <strong>of</strong> analysis are developed. A recommended<br />
method <strong>of</strong> analysis for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) quantification <strong>of</strong><br />
suspected allergens in fragrance compounds has been published by this group in 2003 (Chaintreau<br />
et al., 2003). Some further work on the investigation <strong>of</strong> the GC-MS determination <strong>of</strong> allergens<br />
(GC-MS quantification <strong>of</strong> allergens in fragrances <strong>and</strong> data treatment strategies <strong>and</strong> method performances)<br />
was published more recently by the same group (Chaintreau et al., 2007).<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
c/t<br />
O<br />
Benzyl alcohol Cinnamyl alcohol Cinnamaldehyde<br />
Citral (neral + geranial)<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
O<br />
c/t<br />
OH<br />
Eugenol c/t-Isoeugenol Benzyl salicylate Coumarin<br />
FIGURE 22.1 Structures <strong>of</strong> the 16 naturally occurring alleged allergenic substances (part 1).
922 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
O<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
Benzyl cinnamate Geraniol Linalool Anisyl alcohol<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
O<br />
OH<br />
OH<br />
Benzyl benzoate Farnesol Citronellol D-Limonene<br />
FIGURE 22.2 Structures <strong>of</strong> the 16 naturally occurring alleged allergenic substances (part 2).<br />
22.2.4 RECENT DATA ON SENSITIZATION TO FRAGRANCES<br />
Recently a new study on the sensitization to the 26 fragrance ingredients (24 single substances <strong>and</strong><br />
two natural extracts) that have to be labeled according to the European Regulation was published by<br />
the group <strong>of</strong> Schnuch et al. (2007). This study was part <strong>of</strong> the multicenter project Information<br />
Network <strong>of</strong> Departments <strong>of</strong> Dermatology (IVDK) (Schnuch et al., 1997, 2004). The aim was to<br />
study the frequency <strong>of</strong> sensitization to these 26 alleged allergenic fragrances, in particular the actual<br />
frequencies <strong>of</strong> contact allergy to these 26 fragrances. To test this, the fragrance ingredients were<br />
patch tested in consecutive, unselected patients (in total 21,325 patients) by the IVDK network<br />
during a 2-year period, consisting <strong>of</strong> four periods <strong>of</strong> 6 months. The number <strong>of</strong> patients tested with<br />
each <strong>of</strong> the fragrance substances ranged from 1658 to 4238.<br />
The frequency <strong>of</strong> sensitization was expressed by the proportion <strong>of</strong> patients reacting allergic (% pos.),<br />
that is, the number <strong>of</strong> allergic patients compared to the number <strong>of</strong> patients tested (n pos./n tested, %)<br />
<strong>and</strong> the frequency <strong>of</strong> allergic reactions was then st<strong>and</strong>ardized for age <strong>and</strong> sex.<br />
The “allergenic” fragrances were divided into three groups, depending on the frequency <strong>of</strong><br />
sensitization, based on the 95% confidence interval (CI).<br />
The first group <strong>of</strong> ingredients with the upper CI > 1.0% could be regarded as important allergens<br />
<strong>and</strong> was called Group I. This group includes the two natural extracts, oakmoss <strong>and</strong> tree moss, <strong>and</strong><br />
the substances HMPCC, hydroxycitronellal, isoeugenol, cinnamic acid, <strong>and</strong> farnesol.<br />
Another group <strong>of</strong> ingredients with an upper CI between 0.5% <strong>and</strong> 1.0% was found to be clearly<br />
allergenic but less important in terms <strong>of</strong> sensitization frequency (Group II). This group comprises<br />
cinnamic alcohol, citral, citronellol, geraniol, eugenol, coumarin, lilial, amyl-cinnamic alcohol, <strong>and</strong><br />
benzyl cinnamate.<br />
On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the third group (Group III) comprises substances that have turned out to be<br />
(extremely) rare sensitizers in this study, or which in other instances may even be considered as<br />
nonsensitizers, according to the authors. This group with an upper CI <strong>of</strong> less than 0.5% contains<br />
10 materials: benzyl alcohol, linalool, methylheptin carbonate, a-amyl-cinnamic aldehyde, a-hexylcinnamic<br />
aldehyde, limonene, benzyl salicylate, g-methylionone, benzyl benzoate, <strong>and</strong> anisyl alcohol.<br />
It was further concluded that sensitization to allergens <strong>of</strong> the first group is significantly more frequent<br />
than sensitization to allergens <strong>of</strong> the third group.<br />
Regarding Group III it is also worth noting that some molecules are not allergens as such, but<br />
only turn into allergens after substantial oxidation, for example, limonene <strong>and</strong> linalool (Karlberg<br />
<strong>and</strong> Dooms-Goossens, 1992; Karlberg et al., 1992; Hagvall <strong>and</strong> Karlberg, 2006).
Recent EU Legislation on Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances 923<br />
It is interesting to note that there is a difference in the classification <strong>of</strong> the allergens (reported<br />
frequency) according to the opinion <strong>of</strong> the SCCP (SCCP/0017/98) <strong>and</strong> the classification in groups by<br />
Schnuch et al. For example one substance that is an important allergen according to the study <strong>of</strong><br />
Schnuch (Group I), farnesol, is according to SCCP “less frequently reported.” The same applies to<br />
two substances <strong>of</strong> Group II that are according to SCCP “less frequently reported,” namely citronellol<br />
<strong>and</strong> benzyl cinnamate. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, two materials that are according to the study <strong>of</strong><br />
Schnuch (extremely) rare sensitizers (Group III) are according to SCCP “frequently reported,”<br />
namely benzyl alcohol <strong>and</strong> benzyl salicylate. A comparison <strong>of</strong> the classifications is given in<br />
Table 22.3. Differences in classification according to the two sources are highlighted in bold.<br />
It is important to focus in some more depth on the allergenic potential <strong>of</strong> the natural ingredients,<br />
oakmoss <strong>and</strong> tree moss. In contrast to oakmoss, which is known to be a potent sensitizer since a long<br />
time ago, tree moss had not been systematically tested in cosmetic patch test series in the past, <strong>and</strong><br />
the study by Schnuch et al. (2007) is claimed to be the first study in which tree moss was tested in<br />
a larger population. In this study, tree moss was found to be the most frequent allergen. Earlier study<br />
reports had already identified atranol <strong>and</strong> chloroatranol (degradation products <strong>of</strong> atranorin <strong>and</strong> chloroatranorin)<br />
as the most potent allergens (Johansen et al., 2003, 2006). The chemical structures <strong>of</strong><br />
atranol <strong>and</strong> chloroatranol are depicted in Figure 22.3.<br />
TABLE 22.3<br />
Classification <strong>of</strong> Alleged Allergens According to SC Opinion (Frequently or Less<br />
Frequently Reported)<br />
Name<br />
Tree moss extract 1<br />
Oakmoss extract 1<br />
Frequency<br />
(SCCNFP/0017/98)<br />
(Except for the Mosses<br />
(SCCNFP opinion <strong>of</strong> October<br />
24, 2000; SCCP<br />
(SCCP/00847/04)) Group (Schnuch et al., 2007)<br />
SCCNFP/0202/99 <strong>and</strong><br />
SCCP/00847/04: potent<br />
SCCNFP/0202/99 <strong>and</strong><br />
SCCP/00847/04: potent<br />
Frequency <strong>of</strong><br />
Sensitization a<br />
Group I 2.4<br />
Group I 2.0<br />
Isoeugenol Frequently reported Group I 1.1<br />
Cinnamal Frequently reported Group I 1.0<br />
Farnesol Less frequently reported Group I 0.9<br />
Cinnamyl alcohol Frequently reported Group II 0.6<br />
Citral Frequently reported Group II 0.6<br />
Citronellol Less frequently reported Group II 0.5<br />
Eugenol Frequently reported Group II 0.4<br />
Coumarin Frequently reported Group II 0.4<br />
Geraniol Frequently reported Group II 0.4<br />
Benzyl cinnamate Less frequently reported Group II 0.3<br />
Benzyl alcohol Frequently reported Group III 0.3<br />
Linalool Less frequently reported Group III 0.2<br />
Benzyl salicylate Frequently reported Group III 0.1<br />
d-Limonene Less frequently reported Group III 0.1<br />
Anisyl alcohol Less frequently reported Group III 0.0<br />
Benzyl benzoate Less frequently reported Group III 0.0<br />
Source: SCCNFP opinions versus the publication by Schnuch et al., 2007.<br />
a<br />
Frequency <strong>of</strong> sensitization (%) = n test /n pos. (st<strong>and</strong>ardized for age <strong>and</strong> sex).
924 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Cl<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
HO<br />
OH<br />
Atranol<br />
O<br />
O<br />
Chloroatranol<br />
FIGURE 22.3 Structures <strong>of</strong> atranol <strong>and</strong> chloroatranol, most potent allergens in oakmoss <strong>and</strong> tree moss.<br />
This also seems to be in line with the opinion <strong>of</strong> the SCCP (SCCP/00847/04) on atranol <strong>and</strong> chloroatranol<br />
present in natural extracts (e.g., oakmoss <strong>and</strong> tree moss extract) where both constituents<br />
were regarded as very potent allergens. Because chloroatranol was shown to cause elicitation <strong>of</strong> reactions<br />
by repeated open exposure at the ppm level (0.0005%) <strong>and</strong> at the ppb level on patch testing (50%<br />
elicit at 0.000015%), the SCCP concluded that “chloro-atranol <strong>and</strong> atranol should not be present in<br />
cosmetic products.”<br />
As a result, today the Fragrance Industry is producing oakmoss <strong>and</strong> tree moss with reduced levels<br />
<strong>of</strong> atranol <strong>and</strong> chloroatranol (i.e., oakmoss <strong>and</strong> tree moss absolutes treated for the selective<br />
removal <strong>of</strong> atranol <strong>and</strong> chloroatranol).<br />
The authors concluded in their paper that the study again emphasizes the need for a “different<br />
look” on fragrances as contact allergens, which is a confirmation <strong>of</strong> previous findings (Schnuch<br />
et al., 2002). The authors propose a differentiated evaluation <strong>of</strong> ingredients <strong>of</strong> each group for overall<br />
evaluation, considering not only frequency <strong>of</strong> sensitization, but also the amount <strong>of</strong> exposure<br />
or use, as well as allergenic potency—also exposure to (highly) oxidized materials could be taken<br />
into account.<br />
In particular, for Group I substances the authors agree that a regulation in terms <strong>of</strong> restrictions<br />
(or even ban) <strong>and</strong> labeling is needed, whereas for Group II substances labeling alone may be adequate<br />
enough for the purpose <strong>of</strong> prevention. But according to the authors, for some <strong>of</strong> the ingredients<br />
<strong>of</strong> Group III, neither restrictions nor labeling seems justified.<br />
Thus, the authors express their opinion, justified by the findings <strong>of</strong> this study, that the Commission<br />
Decision on the labeling <strong>of</strong> all 26 “alleged allergens” should be revised.<br />
The Fragrance Industry in turn has taken note <strong>of</strong> this study <strong>and</strong> comes to the same conclusion.<br />
Based on this, the Industry would now like to propose a pragmatic <strong>and</strong> different approach for the<br />
three Groups <strong>of</strong> “alleged fragrance ingredients”: for example for Group III materials, Industry<br />
would advocate no labeling requirements <strong>and</strong> only restrictions where needed based on scientifically<br />
justified concern <strong>and</strong> for Group II <strong>and</strong> Group I materials, the Industry would propose appropriate<br />
<strong>and</strong> adequate measures based on scientific data. The Industry would like to avoid overregulation<br />
<strong>and</strong> overlabeling for alleged sensitizers.<br />
Also the Commission took note <strong>of</strong> the publication <strong>of</strong> this study <strong>and</strong> as a consequence DG<br />
Enterprise sent a m<strong>and</strong>ate to the SCCP with a request for an updated scientific opinion on the<br />
fragrance substances hydroxycitronellal (CAS 107-75-5), isoeugenol (CAS 97-54-1), <strong>and</strong> d-limonene<br />
(CAS 5989-27-5).<br />
Currently, the presence <strong>of</strong> hydroxycitronellal <strong>and</strong> isoeugenol needs to be labeled in the final cosmetic<br />
product according to Annex III, Part 1 <strong>of</strong> the Cosmetic Directive (Entries 72 <strong>and</strong> 73, respectively).<br />
However, in the future, restrictions to these fragrance ingredients may be proposed, because the<br />
Commission is considering a maximum concentration <strong>of</strong> 1.0% <strong>of</strong> hydroxycitronellal <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> 0.02%<br />
<strong>of</strong> cis- <strong>and</strong> trans-isoeugenol (or their sum) in finished cosmetic products (except oral care products).<br />
DG Enterprise has asked SCCP its opinion whether they consider these concentrations to be safe for
Recent EU Legislation on Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances 925<br />
consumers when used in cosmetic products taking into account the scientific data provided. In fact<br />
such restrictions would be more in line with the self-regulating policy <strong>and</strong> principles <strong>of</strong> the Fragrance<br />
Industry, as applied through the IFRA CoP <strong>and</strong> its St<strong>and</strong>ards, as explained above.<br />
Regarding limonene, DG Enterprise has asked SCCP to re-evaluate the level <strong>of</strong> peroxides for the<br />
limonenes in cosmetic products. In parallel, the Fragrance Industry through the Research Institute<br />
for Fragrance Materials (RIFM) is conducting some local lymph node assay (LLNA) work on<br />
limonene <strong>and</strong> some other key materials for a better scientific substantiation <strong>of</strong> the maximum peroxide<br />
level. RIFM is planning to test limonene with different (low) levels <strong>of</strong> peroxide to determine the<br />
EC3 value (equivalent to the human NOEL). This is a project with the University <strong>of</strong> Göteburg,<br />
Sweden (Pr<strong>of</strong>essor. A.-T. Karlberg). Some <strong>of</strong> the goals <strong>of</strong> this research are to investigate the fundamental<br />
scientific basis <strong>of</strong> the auto-oxidation <strong>of</strong> four important structurally related fragrance<br />
ingredients (e.g., limonene) <strong>and</strong> one essential oil; to look more closely at the sensitization potential<br />
<strong>of</strong> limonene (<strong>and</strong> hence to challenge the current sensitization hazard classification <strong>of</strong> R43 <strong>of</strong><br />
limonene, which itself is not a sensitizer, <strong>and</strong> essential oils rich in limonene such as orange oil); <strong>and</strong><br />
to challenge the sensitization hazard classification <strong>of</strong> other essential oils, containing another important<br />
fragrance ingredient, labeled as allergen, namely linalool. This is possible if it can be demonstrated<br />
that linalool oxidizes differently in an essential oil as compared to the pure compound.<br />
The impact <strong>of</strong> hazard classification (e.g., R43 Risk Phrase) <strong>of</strong> fragrance ingredients on the classification<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils containing them will be discussed in more detail in the section on Hazard<br />
Classification <strong>and</strong> Labeling.<br />
The impact <strong>of</strong> allergen labeling requirements on essential oils is very important <strong>and</strong> a different<br />
approach <strong>of</strong> the regulators toward labeling based on the new scientific data available could be very<br />
high. If for example no further labeling requirements would apply to Group III materials (which<br />
include the following six naturally occurring substances: benzyl alcohol, linalool, benzyl salicylate,<br />
d-limonene, anisyl alcohol, <strong>and</strong> benzyl benzoate), the number <strong>of</strong> affected natural raw materials<br />
(extract <strong>and</strong> essential oils) would be reduced from about 180 to only 80 extracts/essential oils that<br />
would need to be taken into account for labeling purposes (see Annex 22.2 to this chapter), according<br />
to the EFFA CoP. This would also have a favorable impact on the analytical burden: much less<br />
essential oils would have to be analyzed for the presence <strong>and</strong> concentration <strong>of</strong> the allergens; also the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> target analytes (allergens) would be reduced from 16 to 10 naturally occurring ones.<br />
The issue on allergen labeling can also have detrimental business impact as some customers<br />
(clients) <strong>of</strong> the fragrance industry (being the cosmetic <strong>and</strong> detergent industry) are requesting<br />
fragrances (i.e., perfume mixtures <strong>and</strong> preparations) that are “allergen-free.” This would mean that<br />
the suppliers <strong>of</strong> essential oils would need to produce “allergen-free” essential oils <strong>and</strong> extracts, that<br />
is, natural materials that do not contain any <strong>of</strong> the 16 naturally occurring “alleged allergens.” This<br />
is <strong>of</strong> course practically impossible. Moreover, generally producing extracts <strong>and</strong> essential oils without<br />
or even with reduced levels <strong>of</strong> the 16 naturally occurring “allergens” (which are very important<br />
fragrance constituents by themselves), for example, by selectively removing them, would have a<br />
very high <strong>and</strong> negative impact on the organoleptic <strong>and</strong> sensory properties <strong>of</strong> the essential oils <strong>and</strong><br />
hence on the fine fragrances <strong>and</strong> perfumes containing them. As mentioned above, only in particular<br />
cases (e.g., for oakmoss <strong>and</strong> tree moss extracts, which are <strong>of</strong> high importance to the perfumer<br />
but also very potent allergens) the Industry is successfully producing new qualities with reduced<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> allergens (in casu atranol <strong>and</strong> chlorotranol) to reduce the sensitization potential <strong>of</strong> the<br />
mosses. It is worthwhile to mention here that a considerable number <strong>of</strong> IFRA St<strong>and</strong>ards (IFRA<br />
prohibited materials) are part <strong>of</strong> the Cosmetics Directive (banned materials under Annex II <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Cosmetics Directive).<br />
22.2.5 FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE DETERGENT REGULATION AND ALLERGEN LABELING<br />
In line with the 7th Amendment <strong>of</strong> the Cosmetic Directive 76/768/EEC as just discussed above in<br />
the previous paragraph, the first amendment <strong>of</strong> the Detergent Regulation (from June 2006) makes
926 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
the labeling <strong>of</strong> the 26 alleged “allergenic” materials m<strong>and</strong>atory: the presence <strong>of</strong> these materials<br />
above the given threshold has to be declared irrespective <strong>of</strong> the way they are added (as such or as<br />
being part <strong>of</strong> “complex ingredients” such as essential oils).<br />
This first amendment is the Commission Regulation (EC) No. 907/2006 (20/06/06) amending<br />
Regulation (EC) No. 648/2004 on detergents. The recital (whereas) (4) <strong>of</strong> this regulation states the<br />
following:<br />
(4) There is a requirement to declare allergenic fragrances if they are added in the form <strong>of</strong> pure substances.<br />
However there is no requirement to declare them if they are added as constituents <strong>of</strong> complex<br />
ingredients such as essential oils or perfumes. To ensure better transparency to the consumer, allergenic<br />
fragrances in detergents should be declared irrespective <strong>of</strong> the way they are added to the detergent.<br />
The threshold for labeling is defined as 0.01% by weight (100 ppm), according to the adaptation<br />
<strong>of</strong> Annex VII (for labeling <strong>and</strong> ingredient data sheet) as follows:<br />
If added at concentrations exceeding 0.01% by weight, the allergenic fragrances that appear on the list<br />
<strong>of</strong> substances in Annex III, Part 1 to Directive 76/768/EEC, as a result <strong>of</strong> its amendment by Directive<br />
2003/15/EC <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Council to include the allergenic perfume ingredients<br />
from the list fi rst established by the Scientifi c Committee on Cosmetics <strong>and</strong> Non-food Products<br />
(SCCNFP) in its opinion SCCNFP/0017/98, shall be listed using the nomenclature <strong>of</strong> that Directive, as<br />
shall any other allergenic fragrances that are subsequently added to Annex III, Part 1 to Directive<br />
76/768/EEC by adaptation <strong>of</strong> that Annex to technical progress.<br />
This text for Annex VII is written in such a way to ensure that the presence <strong>of</strong> the 26 alleged<br />
fragrance materials above the given threshold has to be declared irrespective <strong>of</strong> the way they are<br />
added (i.e., as such or as being part <strong>of</strong> “complex ingredients” such as essential oils).<br />
In that way according to the first amendment <strong>of</strong> the Detergent Regulation, the same rules apply<br />
for detergents as for cosmetic end products for the requirements <strong>of</strong> allergen labeling.<br />
22.3 CURRENT FLAVOURING DIRECTIVE AND FUTURE FLAVOURING<br />
REGULATION: IMPACT ON ESSENTIAL OILS<br />
In the European Union for flavorings, the current Flavouring Directive 88/388/EC still applies.<br />
This is the Council Directive <strong>of</strong> June 22, 1988, on the approximation <strong>of</strong> the laws <strong>of</strong> the MS relating<br />
to flavorings for use in foodstuffs <strong>and</strong> to source materials for their production, as published in the<br />
Official Journal on 15/07/88 (OJ L 184, p. 61). It has been amended once by the Commission<br />
Directive 91/71/EEC <strong>of</strong> 16/01/91 (OJ L 42, p. 25, 15/02/91). As this is a Directive, it is up to the EU<br />
MS to take the necessary measures to ensure that flavorings may not be marketed or used if they<br />
do not comply with the rules laid down in this Directive, as stated in Art. 3 <strong>of</strong> this Directive.<br />
However since recent years (around 2002) a Proposal for a new Regulation <strong>of</strong> the European<br />
Parliament <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Council on flavorings <strong>and</strong> certain food ingredients with flavoring properties<br />
for use in <strong>and</strong> on foods is under discussion. The last version <strong>of</strong> the Commission Proposal that was<br />
the basis for further discussions <strong>and</strong> Amendments from EU Parliament was issued in July 2006.<br />
As many essential oils <strong>and</strong> extracts either contain flavoring substances or are regarded as “food<br />
ingredients with flavoring properties,” this new Flavouring Regulation will have an impact on essential<br />
oils <strong>and</strong> their use as flavoring ingredients for food products. Extracts <strong>and</strong> essential oils contain<br />
certain constituents (substances) that according to this regulation “should not be added as such to<br />
food” or to which maximum levels apply. They are <strong>of</strong>ten referred to as “biologically active<br />
substances” or “active principles.” Especially the application <strong>of</strong> maximum levels <strong>of</strong> these substances<br />
will have an impact on how <strong>and</strong> when extracts, essential oils but also herbs <strong>and</strong> spices may or can<br />
be applied to food. Also the definitions for “natural” have drastically changed. The difference
Recent EU Legislation on Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances 927<br />
between the current Directive 88/388/EC <strong>and</strong> the future Flavour Regulation will be outlined in the<br />
next paragraphs.<br />
22.3.1 CURRENT FLAVOURING DIRECTIVE 88/388/EC<br />
22.3.1.1 Maximum Levels <strong>of</strong> “Biologically Active Substances”<br />
In the current Flavouring Directive 88/388/EC, Annex II sets maximum levels (limits) for certain<br />
substances obtained from flavorings <strong>and</strong> other food ingredients with flavoring properties in foodstuffs<br />
as consumed in which flavorings have been used. Art. 4 (c) stipulates that<br />
(c) the use <strong>of</strong> fl avourings <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> other food ingredients with fl avouring properties does not result in the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> substances listed in Annex II in quantities greater than those specifi ed therein.<br />
The limits apply to Foodstuffs <strong>and</strong> Beverages (mg/kg) — exceptions apply: for example, alcoholic<br />
beverages <strong>and</strong> confectionaries. In Table 22.4, the maximum levels (without the exceptions) for<br />
these substances for foodstuffs in general <strong>and</strong> beverages are given. A more detailed table (with all<br />
the exceptions) is given in Annex 22.3 to this chapter.<br />
This means that for essential oils, extracts, complex mixtures containing these “biologically<br />
active substances” (e.g., nutmeg, cinnamon, peppermint, <strong>and</strong> sage oils) <strong>and</strong> when added to food <strong>and</strong><br />
flavorings, maximum levels apply. The same applies to herbs <strong>and</strong> spices containing these “biologically<br />
active substances” as herbs <strong>and</strong> spices are also “food ingredients with flavoring properties.”<br />
22.3.1.2 Definition <strong>of</strong> “Natural”<br />
Also important is how the current Flavouring Directive addresses “naturalness” <strong>of</strong> flavors <strong>and</strong> how<br />
“natural” is defined for the purpose <strong>of</strong> labeling. This is stipulated by Art. 9a.2 (amending the original<br />
Art. 9.2 <strong>of</strong> 88/388/EC by 91/71/EEC):<br />
2. the word ‘natural’, or any other word having substantially the same meaning, may be used only for<br />
fl avourings in which the fl avouring component contains exclusively fl avouring substances as defi ned<br />
in Article 1 (2) (b) (i) <strong>and</strong>/or fl avouring preparations as defi ned in Article 1 (2) (c). If the sales description<br />
<strong>of</strong> the fl avourings contains a reference to a foodstuff or a fl avouring source, the word ‘natural’ or<br />
any other word having substantially the same meaning, may not be used unless the fl avouring component<br />
has been isolated by appropriate physical processes, enzymatic or microbiological processes<br />
or traditional food-preparation processes solely or almost solely from the foodstuff or the fl avouring<br />
source concerned.<br />
TABLE 22.4<br />
Annex II <strong>of</strong> 88/388/EC—Maximum Levels (mg/kg) for Certain<br />
Substances in Foodstuffs <strong>and</strong> Beverages<br />
Substance<br />
Foodstuffs <strong>and</strong><br />
Beverage Substance Foodstuffs Beverages<br />
Agaric acid 20 Aloin 0.1 0.1<br />
b-Asarone 0.1 Berberine 0.1 0.1<br />
Coumarin 2 Hydrocyanic acid 1 1<br />
Hypericine 0.1 Pulegone 25 100<br />
Quassine 5 Safrole <strong>and</strong> isosafrole 1 1<br />
Santonin 0.1 Thujone (a <strong>and</strong> b) 0.5 0.5
928 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
How a “natural flavoring substance” can be obtained is thus defined in Art. 1.2 (b) (i):<br />
(b) ‘fl avouring substance’ means a defi ned chemical substance with fl avouring properties which is<br />
obtained:<br />
(i) by appropriate physical processes (including distillation <strong>and</strong> solvent extraction) or enzymatic or<br />
microbiological processes from material <strong>of</strong> vegetable or animal origin either in the raw state or after<br />
processing for human consumption by traditional food-preparation processes (including drying,<br />
torrefaction <strong>and</strong> fermentation),<br />
How a “flavoring preparation” can be obtained is defined in Art. 1.2 (c):<br />
(c) ‘fl avouring preparation’ means a product, other than the substances defi ned in (b) (i), whether concentrated<br />
or not, with fl avouring properties, which is obtained by appropriate physical processes<br />
(including distillation <strong>and</strong> solvent extraction) or by enzymatic or microbiological processes from material<br />
<strong>of</strong> vegetable or animal origin, either in the raw state or after processing for human consumption<br />
by traditional food-preparation processes (including drying, torrefaction <strong>and</strong> fermentation);<br />
The above means that a “flavoring preparation” is by default always “natural” <strong>and</strong> that extracts<br />
<strong>and</strong> essential oils (obtained by appropriate physical processes such as distillation <strong>and</strong> solvent extraction)<br />
from material <strong>of</strong> vegetable origin (e.g., plant material) can be considered as “flavoring preparation”<br />
<strong>and</strong> thus “natural.”<br />
22.3.2 FUTURE FLAVOURING REGULATION<br />
As mentioned above, a Proposal for a new Flavouring Regulation is under discussion since the last<br />
years at three levels: the EU Commission, the EU Parliament, <strong>and</strong> the Council (MS-level). The full<br />
title <strong>of</strong> this proposal is Proposal for a Regulation <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Council<br />
on fl avourings <strong>and</strong> certain food ingredients with fl avouring properties for use in foods <strong>and</strong> amending<br />
Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1576/89, Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1601/91, Regulation<br />
(EC) No. 2232/96 <strong>and</strong> Directive 2000/13/EC. The last (amended) proposal from the Commission<br />
dates from 24/10/2007 (Commission Directive 91/71/EEC).<br />
With this new Regulation, the former Council Directive 88/388/EEC <strong>of</strong> June 22, 1988, as well as<br />
its amendment Directive 91/71/EEC <strong>and</strong> the Commission Decision 88/389/EEC will be repealed.<br />
This Flavouring Regulation is part <strong>of</strong> a larger package, called the “Food Improvement Agents<br />
Package” (FIAP), comprising the Flavouring, Additives <strong>and</strong> Enzymes Regulation <strong>and</strong> the Common<br />
Authorisation Procedure. The drafting <strong>of</strong> the entire package started at Commission level, has<br />
undergone a tremendous amount <strong>of</strong> amendments, as issued <strong>and</strong> adopted by the European<br />
Parliament, <strong>and</strong> was at the time <strong>of</strong> the preparation <strong>of</strong> the manuscript for this chapter under discussion<br />
with three parties: the EU Commission, the EU Parliament, <strong>and</strong> the Council under Portuguese<br />
Presidency. The last chance for the parties to come to a political agreement <strong>and</strong> to reach a common<br />
position under the first Reading was in December 2007. However, a common position could not be<br />
reached by the end <strong>of</strong> 2007 <strong>and</strong> there was a second Reading (Plenary session) in July 2008: under<br />
Slovenian Presidency.<br />
For a long time (at the time <strong>of</strong> the preparation <strong>of</strong> the manuscript <strong>of</strong> this chapter) there was not one<br />
final document but two major draft versions: the last amended Commission Proposal <strong>of</strong> 24/10/2007<br />
(Commission Directive 91/71/EEC) <strong>and</strong> the last Council Proposal for Political Agreement <strong>of</strong><br />
10/12/2007 (Commission Directive 93/21/EEC), which were the basis for discussion for the Council<br />
meeting (Agriculture <strong>and</strong> Fisheries) on December 17–18, 2007. The major differences between the<br />
two versions (Commission Proposal <strong>and</strong> Council Proposal) available at the end <strong>of</strong> 2007 (at the time<br />
<strong>of</strong> the preparation <strong>of</strong> this manuscript), <strong>and</strong> the impact on essential oils will be outlined below. As a<br />
final Proposal <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament <strong>and</strong> the Council had just come available shortly before<br />
submission <strong>of</strong> this manuscript for publication (Council Proposal, July 15, 2008), also this final
Recent EU Legislation on Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances 929<br />
Council Proposal will be discussed briefly, in order to be as much as possible up-to-date. Meanwhile<br />
at the time <strong>of</strong> the publication <strong>of</strong> this book, the final version <strong>of</strong> the new Flavouring Regulation has<br />
been published in the Official Journal on 31 December 2008 (OJ L 354, 31.12.2008, p. 34): Regulation<br />
(EC) No 1334/2008. In essence this Regulation as published is the same as the final Council Proposal<br />
which was published on July 15, 2008. It has entered into force on January 20, 2009 <strong>and</strong> will apply<br />
as from January 20, 2011. As <strong>of</strong> this application date, the current Flavouring Directive 88/388/EEC<br />
will be repealed.<br />
22.3.2.1 Maximum Levels <strong>of</strong> “Biologically Active Substances”<br />
Apart from the fact that the current Directive 88/388/EC will turn into a Regulation, there are many<br />
changes that will have an impact on how essential oils <strong>and</strong> extracts will be used as source <strong>of</strong> flavors.<br />
The most important issue is how the so-called biologically active substances are addressed.<br />
This is addressed by Art. 5 <strong>of</strong> the Draft Council Proposal (Art. 6 <strong>of</strong> Commission Proposal):<br />
“Presence <strong>of</strong> certain substances,” which refers to Annex III with the same title. Both Council <strong>and</strong><br />
Commission proposals clearly state in the first paragraph that “Substances listed in Part A <strong>of</strong> Annex<br />
III shall not be added as such to food.”<br />
However, when it comes to the levels <strong>of</strong> these substances coming from the use <strong>of</strong> flavorings <strong>and</strong><br />
food ingredients with flavoring properties (such as extracts, essential oils, herbs, <strong>and</strong> spices), the<br />
Commission <strong>and</strong> Council proposals differ slightly.<br />
Art. 6.2 in the Commission Proposal reads as follows:<br />
2. Maximum levels <strong>of</strong> certain substances, naturally present in fl avourings <strong>and</strong> food ingredients with<br />
fl avouring properties, in the compound foods listed in Part B <strong>of</strong> Annex III shall not be exceeded as a<br />
result <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> fl avourings <strong>and</strong> food ingredients with fl avouring properties in <strong>and</strong> on those foods.<br />
The maximum levels shall apply to the compound foods as <strong>of</strong>fered ready for consumption or as<br />
prepared according to the instructions <strong>of</strong> the manufacturer.<br />
Art. 5.2 in the Council Proposal (December 10, 2007) reads as follows:<br />
2. Without prejudice to Council Regulation No. 1576/89 maximum levels <strong>of</strong> certain substances, naturally<br />
present in fl avourings <strong>and</strong>/or food ingredients with fl avouring properties, in the compound foods<br />
listed in Part B <strong>of</strong> Annex III shall not be exceeded as a result <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> fl avourings <strong>and</strong>/or food<br />
ingredients with fl avouring properties in <strong>and</strong> on those foods.<br />
The maximum levels <strong>of</strong> the substances set out in Annex III apply to foods as marketed, unless<br />
otherwise stated. By way <strong>of</strong> derogation from this principle, for dried <strong>and</strong>/or concentrated foods which<br />
need to be reconstituted the maximum levels apply to the food as reconstituted according to the instructions<br />
on the label, taking into account the minimum dilution factor.<br />
The wording in the latest Council Proposal <strong>of</strong> July 15 (Art. 6) is essentially the same as the wording<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Council Proposal <strong>of</strong> December 10 (Art. 5).<br />
This means that maximum levels <strong>of</strong> these substances also apply when the substances come from<br />
any type <strong>of</strong> food ingredients with flavoring properties; the only difference between the Commission<br />
Proposal <strong>and</strong> the Council proposals is that in the Council proposals an exception is given to dried<br />
<strong>and</strong>/or concentrated foods that can have higher levels before they are diluted/reconstituted. Upon<br />
dilution/reconstitution, the normal maximum levels apply again.<br />
The main difference between the current Flavouring Directive 88/388 <strong>and</strong> the future Flavouring<br />
Regulation is that in the Directive 88/388 there is only one list (Annex II) <strong>of</strong> substances to which the<br />
maximum levels apply—all those substances may not be added as such to food. In contrast, in the<br />
future Flavouring Regulation, the Annex III is split into two parts: Part A with “Substances which<br />
may not be added as such to food” <strong>and</strong> Part B establishing “Maximum levels <strong>of</strong> certain substances,<br />
naturally present in flavourings <strong>and</strong> food ingredients with flavouring properties, in certain compound<br />
food as consumed to which flavourings <strong>and</strong>/or food ingredients with flavouring properties<br />
have been added.”
930 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 22.5<br />
Annex III, Part A: Substances that May Not be Added As Such to Food<br />
Agaric Acid Aloin Capsaicin<br />
1,2-Benzopyrone, coumarin Hypericine b-Asarone<br />
1-Allyl-4-methoxybenzene, estragole Hydrocyanic acid Menth<strong>of</strong>uran<br />
4-Allyl-1,2-dimethoxybenzene, methyleugenol Pulegone Quassin<br />
1-Allyl-3,4-methylene dioxy benzene, safrole Teucrin A Thujone (a <strong>and</strong> b)<br />
Note: Substances in bold are those that are in Part A, Annex III <strong>of</strong> both the Council <strong>and</strong> Commission<br />
proposals—aloin <strong>and</strong> coumarin are not included in Annex III, Part A <strong>of</strong> the Commission proposal.<br />
Part A contains 15 substances (according to the Council proposals) or 13 substances (according<br />
to the Commission Proposal—aloin <strong>and</strong> coumarin are not in), whereas Part B contains 11 substances<br />
(according to the Council proposals) or 10 substances (according to the Commission Proposal—<br />
coumarin is not in).<br />
Table 22.5 lists the Substances <strong>of</strong> Part A <strong>of</strong> Annex III “which may not be added as such to food”<br />
<strong>and</strong> Table 22.6 lists the 11 substances <strong>of</strong> Part B with their respectively maximum levels in the various<br />
compound foods according to the Council proposals.<br />
There are some major differences between the Part B <strong>of</strong> Annex III in the Council proposals <strong>and</strong><br />
the list in the Commission Proposal:<br />
– As mentioned above, maximum levels for coumarin are only set in the Council proposals<br />
<strong>and</strong> not in the Commission Proposal.<br />
– For Teucrin A different levels are set in the Council proposals for different compound<br />
foods, whereas in the Commission Proposal only for one category, namely alcoholic<br />
beverages, a maximum level <strong>of</strong> 2 mg/kg applies.<br />
– Regarding the chemical names, in the Commission Proposal no trivial name is given for<br />
1-allyl-4-methoxybenzene (estragol) <strong>and</strong> 4-allyl-1,2-dimethoxy-benzene (methyleugenol)<br />
in contrast to the Council Proposal (synonyms given).<br />
– But the most important <strong>and</strong> major difference is the statement in the Council Proposal <strong>of</strong><br />
December 10 on top <strong>of</strong> the table, which is not in the Commission Proposal, which reads as<br />
follows:<br />
“These maximum levels shall not apply to compound foods which are prepared <strong>and</strong> consumed<br />
on the same site, contain no added flavourings <strong>and</strong> contain only herbs <strong>and</strong> spices as food ingredients<br />
with flavouring properties.”<br />
This statement is to allow the unrestricted use <strong>of</strong> herbs <strong>and</strong> spices to foods that are prepared <strong>and</strong><br />
consumed on the same site, for example, restaurants <strong>and</strong> catering services.<br />
However, in the latest Council Proposal <strong>of</strong> July 15, this statement has disappeared.<br />
Instead another footnote has been introduced applying to three <strong>of</strong> the substances that are marked<br />
with an asterisk (*): estragol, safrole, <strong>and</strong> methyl eugenol. This footnote reads as follows (Council<br />
Proposal, July 15):<br />
*The maximum levels shall not apply where a compound food contains no added fl avourings <strong>and</strong> the<br />
only food ingredients with fl avouring properties which have been added are fresh, dried or frozen<br />
herbs <strong>and</strong> spices. After consultation with the Member States <strong>and</strong> the Authority, based on data made<br />
available by the Member States <strong>and</strong> on the newest scientifi c information, <strong>and</strong> taking into account the
Recent EU Legislation on Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances 931<br />
TABLE 22.6<br />
Maximum Levels <strong>of</strong> Certain Substances, Naturally Present in Flavorings <strong>and</strong> Food<br />
Ingredients with Flavoring Properties, in Certain Compound Foods Consumed to which<br />
Flavorings <strong>and</strong>/or Food Ingredients with Flavoring Properties have been Added<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the Substance<br />
Compound Food in which the Presence <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Substance is Restricted<br />
Maximum Level<br />
(mg/kg)<br />
b-Asarone Alcoholic beverages 1.0<br />
1-Allyl-4-methoxybenzene, Dairy products 50<br />
estragol<br />
Processed fruits, vegetables (including mushrooms, fungi,<br />
50<br />
roots, tubers, pulses, <strong>and</strong> legumes), nuts, <strong>and</strong> seeds<br />
Fish products 50<br />
Nonalcoholic beverages 10<br />
Hydrocyanic acid Nougat, marzipan, or its substitutes or similar products 50<br />
Canned stone fruits 5<br />
Alcoholic beverages 35<br />
Menth<strong>of</strong>uran<br />
Mint/peppermint containing confectionery, except micro breath 500<br />
freshening confectionery<br />
Micro breath freshening confectionery 3000<br />
Chewing gum 1000<br />
Mint/peppermint containing alcoholic beverages 200<br />
4-Allyl-1,2-dimethoxy-benzene, Dairy products 20<br />
methyleugenol<br />
Meat preparations <strong>and</strong> meat products, including poultry<br />
15<br />
<strong>and</strong> game<br />
Fish preparations <strong>and</strong> fish products 10<br />
Soups <strong>and</strong> sauces 60<br />
Ready-to-eat savouries 20<br />
Nonalcoholic beverages 1<br />
Pulegone<br />
Mint/peppermint containing confectionery, except<br />
250<br />
micro breath freshening confectionery<br />
Micro breath freshening confectionery 2000<br />
Chewing gum 350<br />
Mint/peppermint containing nonalcoholic beverages 20<br />
Mint/peppermint containing alcoholic beverages 100<br />
Quassin Nonalcoholic beverages 0.5<br />
Bakery wares 1<br />
Alcoholic beverages 1.5<br />
1-Allyl-3,4-methylene dioxy Meat preparations <strong>and</strong> meat products, including poultry<br />
15<br />
benzene, safrole<br />
<strong>and</strong> game<br />
Fish preparations <strong>and</strong> fish products 15<br />
Soups <strong>and</strong> sauces 25<br />
Nonalcoholic beverages 1<br />
Teucrin A Bitter-tasting spirit drinks or bitter a 5<br />
Liqueurs b with a bitter taste 5<br />
Other alcoholic beverages 2<br />
Thujone (a <strong>and</strong> b)<br />
Alcoholic beverages, except those produced from<br />
10<br />
Artemisia species<br />
Alcoholic beverages produced from Artemisia species 35<br />
Nonalcoholic beverages produced from Artemisia species 0.5<br />
continued
932 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 22.6 (continued)<br />
Maximum Levels <strong>of</strong> Certain Substances, Naturally Present in Flavorings <strong>and</strong> Food<br />
Ingredients with Flavoring Properties, in Certain Compound Foods Consumed to which<br />
Flavorings <strong>and</strong>/or Food Ingredients with Flavoring Properties have been Added<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the Substance<br />
Compound Food in which the Presence <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Substance is Restricted<br />
Maximum Level<br />
(mg/kg)<br />
Coumarin<br />
Traditional <strong>and</strong>/or seasonal bakery ware containing<br />
50<br />
cinnamon in the labeling<br />
“Breakfast cereals” including muesli 20<br />
Fine bakery ware with exception <strong>of</strong> traditional <strong>and</strong>/or<br />
15<br />
seasonal bakery ware containing cinnamon in the labeling<br />
Desserts 5<br />
a<br />
As defined by Article 1.4 (p) <strong>of</strong> EC Regulation 1576/89.<br />
b<br />
As defined by Article 1.4 (r) <strong>of</strong> EC Regulation 1576/89.<br />
use <strong>of</strong> herbs <strong>and</strong> spices <strong>and</strong> natural fl avouring preparations, the Commission, if appropriate, proposes<br />
amendments to this derogation.<br />
This means that the maximum levels do not apply to estragol, safrole, <strong>and</strong> methyl eugenol when<br />
only fresh, dried, or frozen herbs <strong>and</strong> spices are added! However when “food ingredients with flavoring<br />
properties” such as essential oils are added, or when essential oils <strong>and</strong>/or other flavorings are<br />
added in combination with herbs <strong>and</strong> spices, the levels do apply.<br />
It is anticipated that nothing will change anymore in Art. 6 <strong>of</strong> the Council Proposal <strong>of</strong> July 15<br />
until the adoption <strong>of</strong> the final text <strong>and</strong> that also the Annex III will remain as it is now. However, as<br />
stipulated in the footnote under the Annex III (applying to the three substances with an asterisk)<br />
amendments to the current derogations for herbs <strong>and</strong> spices can be expected.<br />
It is also important to note that according to Art. 30 <strong>of</strong> the Flavouring Regulation (Entry into<br />
Force), which will only apply 24 months after its Entry into Force, Art. 22 shall apply from the date<br />
<strong>of</strong> its Entry into Force. Art. 22 concerns the Amendments to Annexes II through V. This means that<br />
if the Flavouring Regulation would be adopted by the end <strong>of</strong> 2008 <strong>and</strong> hence would apply end <strong>of</strong><br />
2010, the Annexes can be amended immediately, if necessary.<br />
Whereas the Art. 6 <strong>of</strong> the Council Proposal <strong>of</strong> July 15 discussed above (i.e., Art. 6 <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Commission Proposal) relates to “certain substances,” Art. 7 <strong>of</strong> the Council Proposal <strong>of</strong> July 15<br />
(i.e., Art. 7 <strong>of</strong> the Commission Proposal) relates to “Use <strong>of</strong> certain source materials,” which is<br />
even more important in relation to herbs, spices, extracts, <strong>and</strong> essential oils. This article refers to<br />
Annex IV <strong>of</strong> the Regulation, which is a new annex that was not in the current Flavouring Directive<br />
88/388/EC entitled “List <strong>of</strong> source materials to which restrictions apply for their use in the production<br />
<strong>of</strong> flavourings <strong>and</strong> food ingredients with flavouring properties.” This Annex IV consists<br />
<strong>of</strong> two parts:<br />
– Part A: Source materials that shall not be used for the production <strong>of</strong> flavorings <strong>and</strong> food<br />
ingredients with flavoring properties.<br />
– Part B: Conditions <strong>of</strong> use for flavorings <strong>and</strong> food ingredients with flavoring properties<br />
produced from certain source materials.<br />
The complete Annex IV according to the current Draft proposals (there is no difference between<br />
the Draft Council <strong>and</strong> Commission proposals regarding the content <strong>of</strong> Annex IV) is given in<br />
Annex 22.4 to this chapter.
Recent EU Legislation on Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances 933<br />
Art. 7 <strong>of</strong> the Council Proposal <strong>of</strong> July 15 (Art. 7 <strong>of</strong> the Commission Proposal) stipulates the<br />
following:<br />
1. Source materials listed in Part A <strong>of</strong> Annex IV shall not be used for the production <strong>of</strong><br />
fl avourings <strong>and</strong>/or food ingredients with fl avouring properties.<br />
2. Flavourings <strong>and</strong>/or food ingredients with fl avouring properties produced from source<br />
materials listed in Part B <strong>of</strong> Annex IV may only be used under the conditions indicated in<br />
that Annex.<br />
With the exception <strong>of</strong> the fact that “<strong>and</strong>/or” in “flavourings <strong>and</strong>/or food ingredients” in both<br />
paragraphs in the Council Proposal is replaced by “<strong>and</strong>” (“flavourings <strong>and</strong> food ingredients”) in the<br />
Commission Proposal, the remainder <strong>of</strong> the article is exactly the same. It is anticipated that nothing<br />
will change anymore on this article <strong>and</strong> the related Annex IV for the final version <strong>of</strong> the Flavouring<br />
Regulation.<br />
22.3.2.2 Definition <strong>of</strong> “Natural”<br />
Regarding “naturalness” <strong>of</strong> flavors <strong>and</strong> how “natural” is defined for the purpose <strong>of</strong> labeling, the situation<br />
has drastically changed since the current Flavouring Directive 88/388/EC.<br />
For example today according to 88/388/EC there are three categories <strong>of</strong> flavoring substances:<br />
natural, nature-identical (NI), <strong>and</strong> artificial. However, with the new Flavouring Regulation there<br />
will be only two categories: natural <strong>and</strong> not natural, meaning that the difference between the former<br />
categories NI <strong>and</strong> artificial will disappear <strong>and</strong> these two will merge in one category <strong>of</strong> “synthetic<br />
flavorings.”<br />
Also the position <strong>of</strong> the Council is clearly different from the position <strong>of</strong> the Commission. In both<br />
proposals, “natural flavoring substance” is defined by Art. 3.2 (c).<br />
This definition according to the Commission proposals (December 10 <strong>and</strong> July 15) reads as<br />
follows:<br />
(c) ‘natural fl avouring substance’ shall mean a fl avouring substance obtained by appropriate physical,<br />
enzymatic or microbiological processes from material <strong>of</strong> vegetable, animal or microbiological origin<br />
either in the raw state or after processing for human consumption by one or more <strong>of</strong> the traditional<br />
food preparation processes listed in Annex II.<br />
This definition according to the Council Proposal reads as follows:<br />
(c)‘natural fl avouring substance’ shall mean a fl avouring substance obtained by appropriate physical,<br />
enzymatic or microbiological processes from material <strong>of</strong> vegetable, animal or microbiological origin<br />
either in the raw state or after processing for human consumption by one or more <strong>of</strong> the traditional<br />
food preparation processes listed in Annex II; Natural fl avouring substances correspond to substances<br />
that are naturally present <strong>and</strong> have been identifi ed in nature;<br />
Important is the additional line, according to the Council proposals, stating that a substance has<br />
to be identified in nature before it can be regarded as “natural,” so it is not only sufficient to produce<br />
it “in a natural way”: it has to be identical to something that is present in nature. This is to avoid the<br />
problem that arises when an enzymatic or microbial process is developed by which a flavoring substance<br />
can be produced “by enzymatic or microbial processes from material <strong>of</strong> vegetable origin” (i.e., natural<br />
source materials) that up to then has never been identified in nature (<strong>and</strong> is not naturally occurring),<br />
such as ethylvanillin, then such a material would be labeled as a “natural flavoring substance.”<br />
More important than the definition <strong>of</strong> “natural” as such (Art. 3.2 (c)), however, is how “appropriate<br />
physical process” is defined.<br />
Annex II to the Flavouring Regulation gives a list <strong>of</strong> “traditional food preparation processes” by<br />
which (natural) flavoring substances <strong>and</strong> natural flavoring preparations are obtained (in the title <strong>of</strong>
934 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
Annex II in the Commission Proposal the wording “natural flavouring preparations” is used, which<br />
is confusing since flavoring preparations are, as per definition, natural, see below). The full list <strong>of</strong><br />
traditional food preparation processes is given in Annex 22.5 to this chapter.<br />
The definition <strong>of</strong> “appropriate physical process” is different between the two proposals <strong>and</strong> is<br />
described in Art. 3.2 (k).<br />
This definition according to the Commission Proposal reads as follows:<br />
(k) ‘appropriate physical process’ shall mean a physical process which does not intentionally modify<br />
the chemical nature <strong>of</strong> the components <strong>of</strong> the fl avouring, without prejudice to the listing <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />
food preparation processes in Annex II, <strong>and</strong> does not involve the use <strong>of</strong> singlet oxygen, ozone, inorganic<br />
catalysts, metal catalysts, organometallic reagents <strong>and</strong>/or UV radiation.<br />
This definition according to the Council Proposal (December 10, 2007) reads as follows:<br />
(k) ‘appropriate physical process’ shall mean a physical process which does not intentionally modify the<br />
chemical nature <strong>of</strong> the components <strong>of</strong> the fl avouring <strong>and</strong> does not involve among others the use <strong>of</strong> singlet<br />
oxygen, ozone, inorganic catalysts, metal catalysts, organometallic reagents <strong>and</strong>/or UV radiation.<br />
It can be noted that the definition according to the Council Proposal does no longer refer to the<br />
processes listed in Annex II. In contrast to the Commission Proposal where all traditional food preparation<br />
processes as listed in Annex II also fall under the definition <strong>of</strong> “appropriate physical processes”<br />
(cf. the wording “without prejudice to the listing <strong>of</strong> º ”), according to the Council Proposal only<br />
processes that do not intentionally modify the chemical nature <strong>of</strong> the components <strong>of</strong> the flavoring are<br />
considered to be “appropriate physical processes” in order to obtain a “natural flavouring substance.”<br />
This means that distillation <strong>and</strong> certain extraction techniques that do modify the chemical nature<br />
<strong>of</strong> the components are not regarded as “appropriate physical processes” for obtaining natural flavoring<br />
substances.<br />
Fortunately thanks to very strong <strong>and</strong> effective, successful lobbying by the European Flavour<br />
Industry, this has been rectified <strong>and</strong> an amendment to this definition (Art. 3.2 (k)) has been accepted<br />
by Council, Commission, <strong>and</strong> European Parliament.<br />
According to the latest Council Proposal (July 15, 2008), this definition reads as follows:<br />
(k) “appropriate physical process” shall mean a physical process which does not intentionally modify<br />
the chemical nature <strong>of</strong> the components <strong>of</strong> the fl avouring, without prejudice to the listing <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />
food preparation processes in Annex II, <strong>and</strong> does not involve, inter alia, the use <strong>of</strong> singlet oxygen,<br />
ozone, inorganic catalysts, metal catalysts, organometallic reagents <strong>and</strong>/or UV radiation.<br />
This definition again refers to the Annex II, which means that all processes listed in Annex II<br />
also fall again under the definition <strong>of</strong> “appropriate physical processes.”<br />
When looking at the situation for “flavouring preparations” (such as essential oils <strong>and</strong> extracts),<br />
the wording <strong>of</strong> the Commission Proposal is slightly different than that <strong>of</strong> the Council Proposal.<br />
According to Art. 16.2 <strong>of</strong> the Council Proposal (July 15) <strong>and</strong> Art. 15.2 <strong>of</strong> the Commission Proposal,<br />
the term “natural” may be used for the description <strong>of</strong> a flavoring if the flavoring component comprises<br />
only flavoring preparations, which means that a “flavoring preparation” can be regarded as<br />
“natural” by definition. In other words, there is no such thing as a “synthetic flavoring preparation.”<br />
The definition for “flavouring preparation” according to the Commission Proposal reads as follows<br />
(Art. 3.2 (d)):<br />
(d) ‘fl avouring preparation’ shall mean a product, other than a fl avouring substance, obtained from:<br />
(i) food by appropriate physical, enzymatic or microbiological processes either in the raw state<br />
<strong>of</strong> the material or after processing for human consumption by one or more <strong>of</strong> the traditional<br />
food preparation processes listed in Annex II <strong>and</strong>/or appropriate physical processes;
Recent EU Legislation on Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances 935<br />
<strong>and</strong>/or<br />
(ii) material <strong>of</strong> vegetable, animal or microbiological origin, other than food, obtained by one or<br />
more <strong>of</strong> the traditional food preparation processes listed in Annex II <strong>and</strong>/or appropriate physical,<br />
enzymatic or microbiological processes;<br />
The definition for “flavouring preparation” according to the Council proposals (versions<br />
December 10 <strong>and</strong> July 15 being identical) reads as follows (Art. 3.2(d)):<br />
(d) ‘fl avouring preparation’ shall mean a product, other than a fl avouring substance, obtained from:<br />
<strong>and</strong>/or<br />
(i) food by appropriate physical, enzymatic or microbiological processes either in the raw state<br />
<strong>of</strong> the material or after processing for human consumption by one or more <strong>of</strong> the traditional<br />
food preparation processes listed in Annex II;<br />
(ii) material <strong>of</strong> vegetable, animal or microbiological origin, other than food, by appropriate<br />
physical, enzymatic or microbiological processes, the material being taken as such or prepared<br />
by one or more <strong>of</strong> the traditional food preparation processes listed in Annex II;<br />
Although the wording <strong>of</strong> Commission <strong>and</strong> Council differ on this definition, it could be concluded<br />
that according to the latter definition (according to Council Proposal) essential oils <strong>and</strong> extracts<br />
obtained from plant material (material <strong>of</strong> vegetable origin) prepared by distillation (which is a traditional<br />
food preparation process listed in Annex II) followed by an appropriate physical process<br />
can be considered as a “flavoring preparation” <strong>and</strong> thus natural as long as the chemical nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />
components is not intentionally modified during the physical process.<br />
However, it can also be argued that if the physical process after the distillation (e.g., extraction,<br />
drying, evaporation, condensation, dilution, etc.) intentionally modifies the chemistry <strong>of</strong> the components<br />
(which is <strong>of</strong>ten the case), then the end product can no longer be regarded as fl a vor i ng prep a ra -<br />
tion <strong>and</strong> thus natural, according to the Council Proposal.<br />
In that respect, the wording <strong>of</strong> the Commission Proposal (part (ii)) is much broader <strong>and</strong> less<br />
ambiguous <strong>and</strong> will not lead to these restrictions. According to the Commission Proposal, an extract,<br />
essential oil, absolute or concrete, … obtained from material <strong>of</strong> vegetable origin (flower, root, fruit,<br />
etc.) by one or more <strong>of</strong> the processes listed in Annex II complies with the definition <strong>of</strong> “flavoring<br />
preparation” <strong>and</strong> can thus be regarded as a “natural.”<br />
However, it is anticipated that the latest version, being the Council Proposal <strong>of</strong> July 15, 2008,<br />
is the blueprint <strong>of</strong> the final Flavouring Regulation, <strong>and</strong> will be the text as it will most probably be<br />
adopted by the end <strong>of</strong> the year <strong>and</strong> published. Entry into force <strong>of</strong> the new EU Flavouring Regulation<br />
will be on the twentieth day following that <strong>of</strong> its publication in the Official Journal <strong>of</strong> the European<br />
Union. It is anticipated that this will be at the earliest by the end <strong>of</strong> 2008 or the beginning <strong>of</strong> 2009.<br />
As stated above, it shall apply 24 months after the entry into force <strong>of</strong> this Regulation.<br />
22.4 HAZARD CLASSIFICATION AND LABELING OF FLAVORS<br />
AND FRAGRANCES<br />
This section describes the rules for hazard classification <strong>and</strong> labeling <strong>of</strong> F&F substances <strong>and</strong> preparations,<br />
including natural raw materials, such as extracts <strong>and</strong> essential oils, containing hazardous<br />
constituents, according to the EU regulations.<br />
For trade <strong>of</strong> F&F (including pure substances <strong>and</strong> mixtures or preparations there<strong>of</strong> <strong>and</strong> natural<br />
raw materials) within the European Union, certain rules apply within the European Industry which<br />
are established by the European Flavour <strong>and</strong> Fragrance Association Code <strong>of</strong> Practice (EFFA CoP).<br />
The following general considerations are taken over from the Introductory note to the EFFA CoP,<br />
which is published yearly on the EFFA website: www.effa.be. It should be noted that the most recent
936 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
version <strong>of</strong> the EFFA CoP (version <strong>of</strong> 2009) for the first time also takes into account the Globally<br />
Harmonized System <strong>of</strong> Classification <strong>and</strong> Labeling <strong>of</strong> Chemicals (UN-GHS). This GHS has now<br />
also been implemented in the EU with the Publication <strong>of</strong> the EU-GHS Regulation (so-called “CLP<br />
Regulation”: Classification, Labelling <strong>and</strong> Packaging <strong>of</strong> substances <strong>and</strong> mixtures) [Regulation (EC)<br />
No. 1336/2008, OJ L 354, 31.12.2008, p. 60]. It has entered into force on 20 January 2009 <strong>and</strong> the<br />
current Directive 67/548/EEC (DSD) <strong>and</strong> Directive 1999/45/EC (DPD) shall be repealed with effect<br />
from 1 June 2015. However, Annex I <strong>of</strong> the DSD has already been repealed <strong>and</strong> transferred into<br />
Annex VI <strong>of</strong> the EU-CLP Regulation, with exception <strong>of</strong> the last two technical adaptations (ATP 30<br />
<strong>and</strong> ATP 31) to the DSD.<br />
However, the following section on classification on labeling is still based on the currently applicable<br />
DSD <strong>and</strong> DPD.<br />
Within the European Union, substances <strong>and</strong> preparations have to be classified <strong>and</strong>, if dangerous<br />
according to criteria laid down in the regulations, have to be labeled according to certain rules. The<br />
classification <strong>and</strong> labeling <strong>of</strong> substances are either prescribed in Annex I to the Dangerous Substances<br />
Directive 67/548/EEC (DSD) or have to be done by the supplier using the criteria <strong>of</strong> Annex VI <strong>of</strong><br />
this Directive. For preparations, like F&F compounds, it is done according to the Dangerous<br />
Preparations Directive 1999/45/EC (DPD).<br />
Several substances <strong>of</strong> interest to the fragrance <strong>and</strong> flavor industry are mentioned in Annex I <strong>of</strong><br />
the DSD. They are included in the respective attachments to the EFFA CoP with their Annex I<br />
number next to their CAS <strong>and</strong> EU numbers. The label mentioned in the attachment has to be used<br />
in the MS <strong>of</strong> the European Union.<br />
Special emphasis is put on Classification <strong>of</strong> aspiration hazard (Xn; R65) <strong>of</strong> both substances that<br />
can easily reach the lungs upon ingestion <strong>and</strong> cause lung damage (substances with low viscosity <strong>and</strong><br />
low surface tension) <strong>and</strong> mixtures/preparations with a high hydrocarbon (HC) content <strong>and</strong> low kinematic<br />
viscosity that will pose the same hazard.<br />
Based on measurement results for a number <strong>of</strong> natural raw materials (e.g., extracts <strong>and</strong> essential<br />
oils) with HC contents between 10% <strong>and</strong> 90+% <strong>and</strong> on similar measurements <strong>of</strong> some F&F<br />
compounds, a dedicated Working Group <strong>of</strong> the F&F Industry has come to the conclusion that in<br />
practice, substances <strong>and</strong> preparations containing more than 10% <strong>of</strong> HC(s) fall within the criteria for<br />
viscosity <strong>and</strong> surface tension.<br />
Therefore, the European F&F Industry through its EFFA CoP recommends<br />
• To determine the HC content <strong>of</strong> substances (supplier information, analysis) <strong>and</strong> preparations<br />
(including extracts <strong>and</strong> essential oils) (calculation) <strong>and</strong> to classify as Xn; R65 if more<br />
than 10% HC is present.<br />
• That nonclassification should only be possible if viscosity <strong>and</strong>/or surface tension measurement<br />
results are available for a specific substance or preparation (including extracts <strong>and</strong><br />
essential oils).<br />
In addition, classification <strong>and</strong> labeling <strong>of</strong> skin sensitizers is addressed in the CoP: the issue on<br />
skin sensitization (<strong>and</strong> labeling <strong>of</strong> the alleged allergens for the purpose <strong>of</strong> the Cosmetic Directive,<br />
7th Amendment) has been in depth discussed in the first section. However, it should be noted here<br />
that classification <strong>of</strong> substances <strong>and</strong> essential oils or extracts as sensitizers (R43) has nothing to do<br />
with the requirement to label the 26 alleged allergens on the final cosmetic products according to<br />
the Cosmetic Directive (7th Amendment).<br />
Following the EFFA CoP, skin sensitizers are labeled Xi, R43. According to the CoP, it is recommended<br />
to use the administrative limit concentration <strong>of</strong> 1% when classifying preparations (including<br />
extracts <strong>and</strong> essential oils) containing them in all cases, unless a different threshold is laid down<br />
in Annex I to the DSD.<br />
In the EFFA CoP, special attention is paid to the hazard classification <strong>and</strong> labeling <strong>of</strong> natural raw<br />
materials, referred to as “natural complex substances” (NCSs) in the CoP. The terminology Natural
Recent EU Legislation on Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances 937<br />
Complex Substance is used because in some cases the natural raw material (the complex) is regarded<br />
as a single substance, rather than a complex mixture.<br />
NCSs (e.g., essential oils, <strong>and</strong> extracts from botanical <strong>and</strong> animal sources) require special procedures<br />
due to the fact that they might have quite different chemical compositions (<strong>and</strong> therefore<br />
hazard classifications) under the same designation. This may occur even when this differentiates<br />
between species, cultivars <strong>and</strong> chemotypes <strong>and</strong> different production procedures (e.g., absolutes,<br />
resinoids, <strong>and</strong> distilled oils).<br />
There are two ways <strong>of</strong> classifying <strong>and</strong> labeling NCSs such as extracts <strong>and</strong> essential oils: either<br />
based on the data known <strong>and</strong> available on the natural raw material as such (NCS is regarded as a<br />
single “substance”) or based on the hazardous constituents they are composed <strong>of</strong> (NCS is regarded<br />
as a complex mixture).<br />
In the first case, an NCS may be classified on the basis <strong>of</strong> the data obtained by testing the NCS.<br />
The test results <strong>of</strong> an NCS, even if containing classified constituents, are evaluated in accordance<br />
with the DSD. The health <strong>and</strong> environmental hazard classifications derived following this approach<br />
are quality dependent, which is also indicated in the EFFA CoP.<br />
In the second case, for grades <strong>of</strong> NCSs <strong>and</strong> for endpoints for which reliable test data are lacking,<br />
the EU’s Labelling Guide (Annex VI to the DSD) incorporates a requirement introduced by<br />
Commission Directive 93/21/EEC, whereby the hazard classification <strong>of</strong> complex substances shall<br />
be evaluated on the basis <strong>of</strong> levels <strong>of</strong> their known chemical constituents. Where knowledge about<br />
constituents exists, for example, on substances limited as per Annex II <strong>of</strong> Directive 88/388/EC<br />
(the so-called biologically active substances—see above) or on substances with sensitizing, toxic,<br />
harmful, corrosive, <strong>and</strong> environmentally hazardous properties, the classification <strong>and</strong> labeling <strong>of</strong><br />
these NCSs according to the requirements <strong>of</strong> the European Union should follow the rules for preparations<br />
(= mixtures) as prescribed by the DPD.<br />
One dedicated section <strong>of</strong> the EFFA CoP also provides a list with the composition <strong>of</strong> the NCSs<br />
(extracts, essential oils, concretes, absolutes, etc.) in terms <strong>of</strong> the presence (content in %) <strong>of</strong> hazardous<br />
constituents <strong>and</strong> HCs in the NCSs that have to be taken into account for the classification <strong>and</strong><br />
labeling <strong>of</strong> the NCSs or a preparation containing these NCSs, based on the DPD.<br />
F&F compounds that are preparations (i.e., compounded mixtures, formulations, or compositions)<br />
should be classified <strong>and</strong> labeled according to the EU’s DPD 1999/45/EC <strong>and</strong> its articles<br />
6 <strong>and</strong> 7.<br />
In practice, test data on the flavor or fragrance compounds (preparations) are not available or<br />
collected. Therefore the classification <strong>of</strong> these preparations should be based on the chemical<br />
composition <strong>and</strong> should include the contributions <strong>of</strong> hazardous substances present as constituents in<br />
the NCSs present in the formulation. This is another reason why the composition <strong>of</strong> the NCSs in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> the hazardous constituents is also part <strong>of</strong> the EFFA CoP.<br />
Examples <strong>of</strong> important constituents to take into account for classifi cation:<br />
– Sensitizers (R43) Æ NCSs (essential oils <strong>and</strong> extracts) to be classified as R43 if the content<br />
(%) <strong>of</strong> the sensitizer (if one) or the content <strong>of</strong> their sum (if more than one) is greater than or<br />
equal to 1%.<br />
– CMRs (carcinogenic, mutagenic, <strong>and</strong> reprotoxic materials: R45; R46; R68) Æ NCSs<br />
to be classified as CMR if the content <strong>of</strong> the CMR substance(s) is greater than or equal<br />
to 0.1%.<br />
The final classification <strong>and</strong> labeling <strong>of</strong> an essential oil can be totally different depending on the<br />
approach used for the classification, either based on data on the essential oil as such (the first case<br />
described above) or based on the hazardous constituents in the essential oil (the second case<br />
described above). This is illustrated below with two examples: orange oil, containing mainly<br />
limonene [which is classified as both a sensitizer (R43) <strong>and</strong> very toxic for the environment (R50/53)],<br />
<strong>and</strong> nutmeg oil, containing safrole which is a CMR (T; R45-22-68).
938 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
TABLE 22.7<br />
Composition <strong>of</strong> Orange Oil with Main Hazardous Constituents<br />
Constituent Concentration (%) Classification<br />
d-Limonene 96.2 R10-38-43-50/53<br />
Linalool 0.5 Not classified<br />
Citral 0.2 R38-43<br />
Orange oil: Table 22.7 below depicts the composition <strong>of</strong> orange oil with the classification <strong>of</strong> the<br />
main constituents.<br />
Resulting classification <strong>of</strong> orange oil:<br />
• Classification <strong>and</strong> labeling “as a single substance” (based on data on the oil as such):<br />
Xn<br />
R10<br />
R65<br />
Harmful<br />
Flammable<br />
Harmful: may cause lung damage if swallowed<br />
• Classification based on its constituents:<br />
R10<br />
Flammable<br />
R38<br />
Irritating to skin<br />
R43<br />
May cause sensitization by skin contact<br />
R50/53 Very toxic to aquatic organisms (environment)<br />
R65<br />
Harmful: may cause lung damage if swallowed<br />
• Labeling (pictograms) based on its constituents:<br />
Xn:<br />
Harmful<br />
N: dangerous for the environment<br />
Nutmeg oil: Table 22.8 below depicts the composition <strong>of</strong> nutmeg oil with the classification <strong>of</strong> the<br />
main constituents.<br />
Resulting classification <strong>of</strong> nutmeg oil:<br />
• Classification <strong>and</strong> labeling “as a single substance” (based on data on the oil as such):<br />
Xn<br />
R10<br />
R65<br />
Harmful<br />
Flammable<br />
Harmful: may cause lung damage if swallowed<br />
TABLE 22.8<br />
Composition <strong>of</strong> Nutmeg Oil with Main Hazardous Constituents<br />
Constituent Concentration (%) Labeling <strong>and</strong> Classification<br />
Pinenes 40 Xi; R43, N; R50/53<br />
Limonene 7 Xi; R38-43, N; R50/53<br />
Safrole 2 T; R45, Xn; R22-68<br />
Isoeugenol 1 Xn; R21/22, Xi; R36/38-43
Recent EU Legislation on Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances 939<br />
• Classification based on its constituents:<br />
R10<br />
Flammable<br />
R43<br />
May cause sensitization by skin contact<br />
R45<br />
May cause cancer<br />
R50/53 Very toxic to aquatic organisms<br />
(environment)<br />
R65<br />
Harmful: may cause lung damage if<br />
swallowed<br />
R68<br />
Possible risk <strong>of</strong> irreversible effects<br />
• Labeling (pictograms) based on its constituents:<br />
T: Toxic (CMR)<br />
N: Dangerous for the environment<br />
So with these examples, it can be demonstrated that the final Classification <strong>and</strong> Labeling (C&L)<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils will change significantly depending on the approach used: based on existing data<br />
(for the various endpoints) on the essential oil as such or based on the hazardous constituents. It<br />
should however be underlined that according to the rules <strong>of</strong> the EFFA CoP, C&L <strong>of</strong> natural raw<br />
materials or NCSs can only be done for the endpoints for which data (on the NCS as such) are available<br />
(e.g., skin irritation, sensitization, environmental toxicity, etc.)—if no data are available, then<br />
the constituents must be taken into account for the classification for these endpoints.<br />
22.5 CONCLUSION<br />
As described <strong>and</strong> outlined above, several new European Regulations <strong>and</strong> Directives have been<br />
adopted during the last years, <strong>and</strong> other regulations are currently under discussion <strong>and</strong> will soon<br />
enter into force in relation to flavors <strong>and</strong> fragrances <strong>and</strong> cosmetics. NCSs or raw materials (such as<br />
essential oils <strong>and</strong> extracts) are very important ingredients for flavoring <strong>and</strong> fragrance applications.<br />
As a result, these new regulations will have a major impact on the trade <strong>and</strong> use in commerce <strong>of</strong><br />
these essential oils <strong>and</strong> extracts, in particular on labeling issues, as has been demonstrated with the<br />
7th Amendment <strong>of</strong> the Cosmetic Directive (labeling <strong>of</strong> alleged allergens) <strong>and</strong> the coming new<br />
Flavouring Regulation (labeling <strong>of</strong> “natural”). The labeling issue is especially important because <strong>of</strong><br />
its impact on consumer behavior: consumers do not want to buy cosmetic end products that are<br />
labeled with potentially allergenic ingredients. Overlabeling should always be avoided. Therefore it<br />
is essential to lobby for a pragmatic approach toward allergen labeling <strong>and</strong> to advocate no labeling<br />
requirements for fragrance ingredients that are proven to be (extremely) rare sensitizers or no sensitizers<br />
at all, especially if these are naturally occurring constituents <strong>of</strong> a wide variety <strong>of</strong> essential oils<br />
<strong>and</strong> extracts. With respect to food, consumers prefer natural flavorings to synthetic ones. Good <strong>and</strong><br />
pragmatic definitions in the Flavouring Regulation that will soon replace the current Flavouring<br />
Directive are essential to ensure that all natural raw materials such as essential oils <strong>and</strong> extracts can<br />
be labeled as natural.
940 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
ANNEX 22.1<br />
Aromatic Natural Raw Materials Containing Any <strong>of</strong> the 16 Naturally Occurring Alleged Aensitizers<br />
Benzyl<br />
Alcohol<br />
Benzyl<br />
Salicylate<br />
Cinnamyl<br />
Alcohol<br />
Cinnamal<br />
Citral<br />
Coumarin<br />
Eugenol<br />
Geraniol<br />
Isoeugenol<br />
Anisyl<br />
Alcohol<br />
Benzyl<br />
Benzoate<br />
Benzyl<br />
Cinnamate<br />
Citronellol<br />
Farnesol<br />
Limonene<br />
Linalool<br />
Total %<br />
Aromatic Natural Raw<br />
Materials Type<br />
Ambrette * * * * * * * * * * * * * 5 * 1 6<br />
Angelica root * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 18 0.3 18.3<br />
Angelica seed * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 0<br />
Star Anise * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 3 1.5 4.5<br />
Anise * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 2 0.1 2.1<br />
Armoise * * * * * * * * * * * * 0.2 * 2 * 2.2<br />
Basil Linalol * * * * * * 15 0.2 * * * * 0.3 * 1 62 78.5<br />
Basil Me-chavicol * * * * * * 0.5 * * * * * * * 1 1.1 2.6<br />
Bay * * * * * * 56 * * * * * * * 4 3 63<br />
Benzoin note 1 * * * * * * * * * * 0.2 0.8 * * * * 1<br />
Bergamot (s) cold press * * * * 0.7 * * * * * * * * * 45 15 60.7<br />
Bergamot bergapten-free * * * * 0.7 * * * * * * * * * 45 15 60.7<br />
Bergamot distilled * * * 0.4 * * * * * * * * * 40 40 80.4<br />
Bitter orange * * * * 0.1 * * * * * * * * * 95 0.2 95.3<br />
Buchu (s) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 30 0.5 30.5<br />
Cabreuva * * * * * * * * * * * * * 3 * * 3<br />
Cajuput * * * * * * * 0.4 * * * * * * 10 3.6 14<br />
Camphor * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 25 0.5 25.5<br />
Cananga * 3 * * * * 0.7 1.5 * * 5 * * 2 * 3 15.2<br />
Caraway * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 45 * 45<br />
Cardamom * * * * 0.6 * * 1.2 * * * * * * 4 4 9.8<br />
Carrot * * * * * * * 2 * * * * * * 3 2 7<br />
Cascarilla * * * * * * 0.3 * * * * * * * 5 5 10.3<br />
Cassia * * 1 90 * 4 0.5 * * * 1 * * * 0.1 * 96.6<br />
Cedarwood (s) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 0<br />
Celery * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 79 0.1 79.1<br />
Chamomile Roman * * * * * * * 0.7 * * * * 0.7 * 5 0.8 7.2
Recent EU Legislation on Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances 941<br />
Chamomile Blue * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 1 0.4 1.4<br />
Cinnamon bark * * 0.2 75 * 0.3 6 * * * 1.5 * * * 1 6 90<br />
Cinnamon leaf * * 1 3 * 0.3 85 * * * 4 * * * * 4 97.3<br />
Cistus (Rockrose) * * * * * * * 1.2 * * * * * * 4 0.5 5.7<br />
Sri Lanka Citronella * * * * 1.1 * * 23 * * * * 8.5 * 12 1 45.6<br />
Java Citronella * * * * 1.3 * 1 25 * * * * 14 1 5 1.5 48.8<br />
Clary Sage (s) * * * * * * * 2.2 * * * * * * 1 24 27.2<br />
Clove (s) * * * * * * 92 * 0.5 * * * * * * * 92.5<br />
Copaiba * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 0<br />
Cori<strong>and</strong>er fruit * * * * * * * 3 * * * * * * 5 78 86<br />
Cori<strong>and</strong>er leaf * * * * * * * 0.4 * * * * * * 1 25 26.4<br />
Corn mint Arvensis * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 7 * 7<br />
Cubeb * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 1 1.2 2.2<br />
Cypress (s) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 14 0.8 14.8<br />
Davana * * * * * * 0.1 * * * * * * * 0.1 1 1.2<br />
Dill (s) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 45 4 49<br />
Elemi * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 72 * 72<br />
Estragon Tarragon * * * * * * 0.2 * * * * * * * 6 * 6.2<br />
Eucalyptus globulus * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 8 * 8<br />
Eucalyptus dives * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 1 1 2<br />
Eucalyptus citriodora * * * * * * * * * * * * 0.7 * 1 0.3 2<br />
Fennel Bitter * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 35 * 35<br />
Fennel Sweet * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 4 * 4<br />
Galbanum * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 3.4 * 3.4<br />
Geranium N. Africa * * * * 1.5 * * 18 * * * * 36 * 1 8.5 65<br />
Geranium Bourbon * * * * 1.5 * * 20 * * * * 26 * 1 11 59.5<br />
Geranium China * * * * 1.2 * * 12 * * * * 43 * 1 4.5 61.7<br />
Ginger (s) * * * * 0.7 * * * * * * * * * 2 0.6 3.3<br />
Grapefruit (s) * * * * 0.15 * * * * * * * * * 95 0.1 95.25<br />
Guaiac wood * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 0<br />
Gurjun * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 0<br />
Hay note 1 * * * * * 8 * * * * * * * * * * 8<br />
Ho (s) * * * * * * * 0.4 * * * * * * 0.2 90 90.6<br />
Hop * * * * * * * 0.2 * * * * * * 1 0.6 1.8<br />
continued
942 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
ANNEX 22.1 (continued)<br />
Benzyl<br />
Alcohol<br />
Benzyl<br />
Salicylate<br />
Cinnamyl<br />
Alcohol<br />
Cinnamal<br />
Citral<br />
Coumarin<br />
Eugenol<br />
Geraniol<br />
Isoeugenol<br />
Anisyl<br />
Alcohol<br />
Benzyl<br />
Benzoate<br />
Benzyl<br />
Cinnamate<br />
Citronellol<br />
Farnesol<br />
Limonene<br />
Linalool<br />
Total %<br />
Aromatic Natural Raw<br />
Materials Type<br />
Hyssop * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 4 * 4<br />
Immortelle * * * * * * * * * * * 0.2 * * 3.8 6 10<br />
Juniper berry * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 20 0.2 20.2<br />
Labdanum * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 4 * 4<br />
Laurel (s) * * * * * * 2 0.3 * * * * * * 5 11 18.3<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>in (s) * * * * * 0.1 * 0.6 * * * * * * 2 38 40.7<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>in absolute * * * * * 5 * 1.5 * * * * * * 1 42 49.5<br />
Lavender absolute * * * * * 8 * 1.5 * * * * * * 0.3 42 51.8<br />
Lavender (s) * * * * * * * 1.1 * * * * * * 1 45 47.1<br />
Spike lavender * * * * * 0.2 0.1 0.2 * * * * 0.3 * 3 50 53.8<br />
Lemon (s) * * * * 3 * * 0.2 * * * * * * 73 0.3 76.5<br />
Lemongrass (s) * * * * 90 * 0.3 7 * * * * 0.8 * 4 2 100<br />
Lime (s) distilled * * * * 3 * * 0.4 * * * * * * 50 0.2 53.6<br />
Lime (s) cold press * * * * 6.5 * * 0.4 * * * * * * 55 0.2 62.1<br />
Litsea cubeba<br />
Mace<br />
* * * * 78 * * 1.5 * * * * 1.5 * 15 3 99<br />
* * * * * * 1.1 * 0.2 * * * * * 4 0.4 5.7<br />
M<strong>and</strong>arin (s) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 75 0.3 75.3<br />
Marjoram sweet * * * * * * * 0.3 * * * * * * 5 25 30.3<br />
Marjoram wild Spanish * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 6 48 54<br />
Mentha citrata (s) * * * * * * * 2 * * * * * * 1 50 53<br />
Myrrh * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 0<br />
Myrtle<br />
Neroli<br />
Niaouli<br />
Nutmeg<br />
* * * * * 0.2 0.7 0.8 * * * * 0.3 * 12 2 16<br />
* * * * 0.3 * * 3.5 * * * * * 4 18 44 69.8<br />
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * 10 0.2 10.2<br />
* * * * * * 0.6 0.4 1 * * * 0.2 * 7 0.4 9.6<br />
Oakmoss note 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 0<br />
Olibanum note 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 18.5 * 18.5<br />
Opoponax note 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 0
Recent EU Legislation on Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances 943<br />
Sweet orange (s) * * * * 0.1 * * * * * * * * * 95 0.4 95.5<br />
Origanum Spanish * * * * 0.5 * 0.3 * 0.3 * * * * * 1 15 17.1<br />
Palmarosa (s) * * * * 1 * * 85 * * * * * 1.2 1 4 92.2<br />
Parsley (s) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 5 * 5<br />
Patchouli (s) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 0<br />
Pepper (s) Black * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 23 1 24<br />
Peppermint Piperita * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 3 0.4 3.4<br />
Peru oil note 1 4.5 * * * * * * * * * 78 9 * * * * 91.5<br />
Bitter orange petitgrain * * * * 0.3 * * 4 * * * * * * 6 30 40.3<br />
Lemon petitgrain * * * * 26 * * 3.5 * * * * * * 42 2.5 74<br />
M<strong>and</strong>arin petitgrain * * * * 0.1 * * * * * * * * * 11 0.7 11.8<br />
Bergamot petitgrain * * * * 1 * * 4 * * * * * * 1.5 30 36.5<br />
Petitgrain Paraguay * * * * 1 * * 4.5 * * * * * * 2 30 37.5<br />
Pimento (s) * * * * * * 85 * 1 * * * * * 2 0.5 88.5<br />
Pine (s) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 6 0.2 6.2<br />
Rose oil Bulgaria * * * * 1 * 1.5 22 * * * * 34 1 * 1.4 60.9<br />
Rose oil Maroc * * * * 1 * 1.5 47 * * * * 20 1 * 1.4 71.9<br />
Rose oil China * * * * 1.5 * 1.5 18.3 * * * * 31 1 * 1.3 54.6<br />
Rose oil (s) Turkey * * * * 2 * 1.5 20 * * * * 49 1 * 1.3 74.8<br />
Rosemary (s) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 6 0.8 6.8<br />
Rosewood<br />
* * * * * * * 2.5 * * 1.6 * * * 1 90 95.1<br />
Sage (s) * * * * * * * 0.4 * * * * * * 5 9 14.4<br />
S<strong>and</strong>alwood * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 0<br />
Schinus molle (s) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 15 0.5 15.5<br />
Spearmint (s) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 24 0.2 24.2<br />
Spikenard * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 0<br />
Styrax resin note 1 0.1 * 3.5 * * * * * * * * 1.5 * * * * 5.1<br />
Styrax oil * * 54 1.1 * * * * * * * * * * * * 55.1<br />
Tagete (s) * * * * * * 0.2 * * * * * 3 * 9 0.5 12.7<br />
Tangerine (s) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 95 0.5 95.5<br />
Tarragon Estragon * * * * * * 0.2 * * * * * * * 6 * 6.2<br />
Tea tree * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 4 * 4<br />
Red thyme Spanish * * * * 0.5 * * 0.5 * * * * * * 1 6.5 8.5<br />
Tolu note 1 0.5 * 0.6 1.7 * * 0.1 * * * 37.5 4.6 * * * * 45<br />
continued
944 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
ANNEX 22.1 (continued)<br />
Benzyl<br />
Alcohol<br />
Benzyl<br />
Salicylate<br />
Cinnamyl<br />
Alcohol<br />
Cinnamal<br />
Citral<br />
Coumarin<br />
Eugenol<br />
Geraniol<br />
Isoeugenol<br />
Anisyl<br />
Alcohol<br />
Benzyl<br />
Benzoate<br />
Benzyl<br />
Cinnamate<br />
Citronellol<br />
Farnesol<br />
Limonene<br />
Linalool<br />
Total %<br />
Aromatic Natural Raw<br />
Materials Type<br />
Tonka * * * * * 65 * * * * * * * * * * 65<br />
Treemoss note1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 0<br />
Turpentine (s) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 7 * 7<br />
Valerian * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 2 * 2<br />
Vetiver (s) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 0<br />
Ylang extra super 0.5 3.5 * * * * 0.5 0.7 0.5 * 6 * * 2 * 13 26.7<br />
Ylang extra (s) 0.5 4 * * * * 0.5 3 0.5 * 8 * * 3 * 24 43.5<br />
Ylang I (s) 0.5 4 * * * * 0.5 2.6 0.5 * 9.2 * * 3 * 19 39.3<br />
Ylang II (s) 0.5 4 * * * * 0.5 2.4 0.5 * 10 * * 4 * 9.5 31.4<br />
Ylang III (s) 0.5 5 * * * * 0.5 0.8 0.5 * 8.5 * * 4 * 40 59.8<br />
Legend * = < 0.1% % = Actual value ISO st<strong>and</strong>ardized essential oils, INCI chemical names used in this list<br />
Source: Internal communication (2004) regarding former version <strong>of</strong> EFFA CoP.
Recent EU Legislation on Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances 945<br />
ANNEX 22.2<br />
Natural Raw Materials (Natural Complex Substances) Containing the 10 Naturally<br />
Occurring Alleged Allergens <strong>of</strong> Groups I <strong>and</strong> II According to Schnuch et al. (2007)<br />
Ambrette Clove stem Linaloe wood Rose absolute<br />
Armoise (A. alba) Cori<strong>and</strong>er leaf/herb Litsea cubebe Rose, Bulg<br />
Armoise (A. vulgar.) Cori<strong>and</strong>er seed Mace Rose, China<br />
Artemisia Deertongue leaf abs Melissa (lem. balm) Rose, Maroc<br />
Basil, linal. type Euc. Citriodora Mentha citrata Rose, Turkey<br />
Bay Flouve Myrtle Rosewood<br />
Cabreuva Geranium, Bourbon Neroli S<strong>and</strong>alwood Aus. (S. spicatum)<br />
Cananga Geranium, Chin. Nutmeg Snakeroot<br />
Cardamon Geranium, N. Afr. Orange flower abs Styrax<br />
Carnation abs Hay abs Osmanthus abs Thyme, wild (T. serpyllum)<br />
Carrot seed Hyacinth absolute Palmarosa Tolu abs<br />
Cassia Labdanum Peru balsam oil Tonka abs<br />
Cassie abs (Acacia) Laurel (Sweet bay) Peru balsam resinoid Tuberose abs<br />
Cinnamon bark Lav<strong>and</strong>in abs Petit grain, bergamot Turmeric<br />
Cinnamon leaf Lavender Petit grain, lemon Verbena abs<br />
Citronella Ceylon Lavender abs Petit grain, orange Verbena oil<br />
Citronella Java Lemon Petit grain, Paraguay Ylang extra sup.<br />
Clary sage Lemongrass Pimento berry Ylang extra, Com. (Mad.)<br />
Clove bud Lime, dist Pimento leaf Ylang, Com., (Mad.)<br />
Clove leaf Lime, expr. Rhodinol<br />
Source: EFFA-CoP.<br />
ANNEX 22.3<br />
Maximum Limits for Certain Substances Obtained from Flavorings <strong>and</strong> other Food<br />
Ingredients with Flavoring Properties Present in Foodstuffs as Consumed in which<br />
Flavorings have been Used (Annex II <strong>of</strong> 88/388/EC)<br />
Substances<br />
Foodstuffs<br />
(mg/kg)<br />
Beverages<br />
(mg/kg)<br />
Exceptions <strong>and</strong>/or Special Restrictions<br />
Agaric acid ( 1 ) 20 20 100 mg/kg in alcoholic beverages <strong>and</strong> foodstuffs<br />
containing mushrooms<br />
Aloin ( 1 ) 0.1 0.1 50 mg/kg in alcoholic beverages<br />
b-Asarone ( 1 ) 0.1 0.1 1 mg/kg in alcoholic beverages <strong>and</strong> seasonings used in snack foods<br />
Berberine ( 1 ) 0.1 0.1 10 mg/kg in alcoholic beverages<br />
Coumarin ( 1 ) 2 2 10 mg/kg in certain types <strong>of</strong> caramel confectionery<br />
50 mg/kg in chewing gum<br />
10 mg/kg in alcoholic beverages<br />
Hydrocyanic acid ( 1 ) 1 1 50 mg/kg in nougat, marzipan or its substitutes or similar products<br />
1 mg/% volume <strong>of</strong> alcohol in alcoholic beverages<br />
5 mg/kg in canned stone fruit<br />
Hypericine ( 1 ) 0.1 0.1 10 mg/kg in alcoholic beverages<br />
1 mg/kg in confectionery<br />
continued
946 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
ANNEX 22.3 (continued)<br />
Maximum Limits for Certain Substances Obtained from Flavorings <strong>and</strong> other Food<br />
Ingredients with Flavoring Properties Present in Foodstuffs as Consumed in which<br />
Flavorings have been Used (Annex II <strong>of</strong> 88/388/EC)<br />
Substances<br />
Foodstuffs<br />
(mg/kg)<br />
Beverages<br />
(mg/kg)<br />
Exceptions <strong>and</strong>/or Special Restrictions<br />
Pulegone ( 1 ) 25 100 250 mg/kg in mint or peppermint-flavored beverages<br />
350 mg/kg in mint confectionery<br />
Quassine ( 1 ) 5 5 10 mg/kg in confectionery in pastille form<br />
50 mg/kg in alcoholic beverages<br />
Safrole <strong>and</strong><br />
isosafrole ( 1 )<br />
1 1 2 mg/kg in alcoholic beverages with not more than 25% volume<br />
<strong>of</strong> alcohol<br />
5 mg/kg in alcoholic beverages with more than 25% volume <strong>of</strong> alcohol<br />
15 mg/kg in foodstuffs containing mace <strong>and</strong> nutmeg<br />
Santonin ( 1 ) 0.1 0.1 1 mg/kg in alcoholic beverages with more than 25% volume <strong>of</strong> alcohol<br />
Thuyone (a <strong>and</strong> b) ( 1 ) 0.5 0.5 5 mg/kg in alcoholic beverages with not more than 25% volume<br />
<strong>of</strong> alcohol<br />
10 mg/kg in alcoholic beverages with more than 25% volume <strong>of</strong> alcohol<br />
25 mg/kg in foodstuffs containing preparations based on sage<br />
35 mg/kg in bitters<br />
( 1 ) May not be added as such to foodstuffs or to flavorings. May be present in a foodstuff either naturally or following the<br />
addition <strong>of</strong> flavorings prepared from natural raw materials<br />
ANNEX 22.4<br />
List <strong>of</strong> Source Materials to which Restrictions Apply for Their Use in the Production <strong>of</strong><br />
Flavorings <strong>and</strong> Food Ingredients with Flavoring Properties (Annex IV <strong>of</strong> Draft Flavouring<br />
Regulation, According to Council Proposal, December 10, 2007)<br />
Part A:<br />
Source materials which shall not be used for the production <strong>of</strong> flavorings <strong>and</strong> food ingredients<br />
with flavoring properties<br />
Source Material<br />
Latin Name<br />
Tetraploid form <strong>of</strong> Acorus calamus<br />
Common Name<br />
Tetraploid form <strong>of</strong> Calamus<br />
Part B: Conditions <strong>of</strong> use for flavorings <strong>and</strong> food ingredients with flavoring properties produced from certain<br />
source materials<br />
Source Material<br />
Latin Name<br />
Quassia amara L. <strong>and</strong><br />
Picrasma excelsa (Sw)<br />
Laricifomes <strong>of</strong>fi cinales<br />
(Vill.: Fr) Kotl. et Pouz or<br />
Fomes <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis<br />
Hypericum perforatum<br />
Teucrium chamaedrys<br />
Common Name<br />
Quassia<br />
White agaric mushroom<br />
St Johns wort<br />
Wall germ<strong>and</strong>er<br />
Conditions <strong>of</strong> Use<br />
Flavorings <strong>and</strong> food ingredients with flavoring properties<br />
produced from the source material may only be used for<br />
the production <strong>of</strong> beverages <strong>and</strong> bakery wares<br />
Flavorings <strong>and</strong> food ingredients with flavoring properties<br />
produced from the source material may only be used for<br />
the production <strong>of</strong> alcoholic beverages
Recent EU Legislation on Flavors <strong>and</strong> Fragrances 947<br />
ANNEX 22.5<br />
List <strong>of</strong> Traditional Food Preparation Processes (Annex II <strong>of</strong> Draft Flavouring<br />
Regulation, According to Council Proposal)<br />
Chopping<br />
Heating, cooking, baking, frying (up to 240°C at<br />
atmospheric pressure) <strong>and</strong> pressure cooking (up to 120°C)<br />
Cutting<br />
Drying<br />
Evaporation<br />
Fermentation<br />
Grinding<br />
Infusion<br />
Microbiological processes<br />
Peeling<br />
Pressing<br />
Roasting /grilling<br />
Steeping<br />
Cooling<br />
Coating<br />
Distillation/rectification<br />
Emulsification<br />
Extraction, including solvent extraction in<br />
accordance with Directive 88/344/EEC<br />
Filtration<br />
Maceration<br />
Mixing<br />
Percolation<br />
Refrigeration/freezing<br />
Squeezing<br />
REFERENCES<br />
7th Amendment <strong>of</strong> the Cosmetic Directive: Directive 2003/15/EC <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Council <strong>of</strong> February 27, 2003 (OJ L 66/26, 11.3.2003).<br />
18th ATP <strong>of</strong> DSD: Commission Directive 93/21/EEC <strong>of</strong> April 27, 1993 adapting to technical progress for the<br />
18th time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the Approximation <strong>of</strong> the laws, regulations <strong>and</strong> administrative<br />
provisions relating to the classification, packaging <strong>and</strong> labelling <strong>of</strong> dangerous substances (OJ L 110,<br />
4.5.1993, p. 20).<br />
88/389/EEC: Council Decision <strong>of</strong> June 22, 1988 on the establishment, by the Commission, <strong>of</strong> an inventory <strong>of</strong><br />
the source materials <strong>and</strong> substances used in the preparation <strong>of</strong> flavourings (OJ L 184, 15.7.1988, p. 67).<br />
Becker, K., E. Temesvari, <strong>and</strong> I. Nemeth, 1994. Patch testing with fragrance mix <strong>and</strong> its constituents in a<br />
Hungarian population. Cont. Dermat., 30: 185–186.<br />
Chaintreau, A. et al., 2003. GC-MS quantification <strong>of</strong> fragrance compounds suspected to cause skin reactions.<br />
1. J. Agric. Food Chem., 51: 6398–6403.<br />
Chaintreau, A. et al., 2007. GC-MS quantification <strong>of</strong> suspected volatile allergens in fragrances. 2. Data treatment<br />
strategies <strong>and</strong> method performances. J. Agric. Food Chem., 55: 25–31.<br />
Commission Directive 2006/8/EC <strong>of</strong> January 23, 2006 (OJ L 19/12, 24.1.2006).<br />
Commission Directive 91/71/EEC <strong>of</strong> January 16, 1991 completing Council Directive 88/388/EEC on the<br />
approximation <strong>of</strong> the laws <strong>of</strong> the Member States relating to flavourings for use in foodstuffs <strong>and</strong> to source<br />
materials for their production (OJ L 42, 15.2.1991, p. 25).<br />
Cosmetic Directive: Council Directive 76/768/EEC <strong>of</strong> July 27, 1976 on the approximation <strong>of</strong> the laws <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Member States relating to cosmetic products (OJ L 262, 27.7.1976, p. 169).<br />
Council Proposal, July 15, 2008. Proposal for a Regulation <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Council on<br />
flavourings <strong>and</strong> certain food ingredients with flavouring properties for use in <strong>and</strong> on foods <strong>and</strong> amending<br />
Council Regulations (EEC) No. 1576/89 <strong>and</strong> (EEC) No. 1601/91, Regulation (EC) No. 2232/96 <strong>and</strong><br />
Directive 2000/13/EC – Outcome <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament’s second reading (Strasbourg, 7 to 10 July<br />
2008), Brussels, 15 July 2008. 11479/08, CODEC 922, DENLEG 86.<br />
Dangerous Preparations Directive: Directive 1999/45/EC <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong><br />
May 31, 1999 concerning the approximation <strong>of</strong> the laws, regulations <strong>and</strong> administrative provisions <strong>of</strong><br />
the Member States relating to the classification, packaging <strong>and</strong> labeling <strong>of</strong> dangerous preparations (OJ<br />
L 200, 30.7.1999, p. 1).<br />
Dangerous Substances Directive: Council Directive 67/548/EEC <strong>of</strong> June 27, 1967 on the approximation <strong>of</strong><br />
laws, regulations <strong>and</strong> administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging <strong>and</strong> labelling<br />
<strong>of</strong> dangerous substances (OJ P 196, 16.8.1967, p. 1).
948 <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong><br />
EFFA Code <strong>of</strong> Practice (EFFA CoP): Home page <strong>of</strong> the European Flavour & Fragrance Association (EFFA):<br />
www.effa.be<br />
First amendment <strong>of</strong> the Detergent Regulation: Commission Regulation (EC) No. 907/2006 <strong>of</strong> June 20, 2006<br />
(OJ L 168/5, 21.6.2006).<br />
Flavouring Regulation <strong>of</strong> December 31, 2008. Regulation (EC) No. 1334/2008 <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> 16 December 2008 on flavourings <strong>and</strong> certain food ingredients with flavouring properties<br />
for use in <strong>and</strong> on foods <strong>and</strong> amending Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1601/91, Regulations (EC) No.<br />
2232/96 <strong>and</strong> (EC) No. 110/2008 <strong>and</strong> Directive 2000/13/EC – OJ L 354, 31.12.2008, p. 34.<br />
Frosch, P.J., B. Pilz, K.E. Andersen, et al., 1995. Patch testing with fragrances : Results <strong>of</strong> a multicenter study<br />
<strong>of</strong> the European Environmental <strong>and</strong> Contact Dermatitis Research Group with 48 frequently used<br />
constituents <strong>of</strong> perfumes. Cont. Dermat., 33: 333–342.<br />
Hagvall, L. <strong>and</strong> A.-T. Karlberg, 2006. Air exposure turns common fragrance terpenes into strong allegens. Book<br />
<strong>of</strong> Abstracts, 37th Int. Symp. on <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> (ISEO 2006), Grasse, September 10–13, PL-2.<br />
IFRA Code <strong>of</strong> Practice (IFRA CoP): Home page <strong>of</strong> the International Fragrance Association (IFRA): www.<br />
ifraorg.org<br />
Johansen, J.D., K.E. Andersen, C. Svedman, et al., 2003. Chloroatranol, an extremely potent allergen hidden in<br />
perfumes: A doseresponse elicitation study. Cont. Dermat., 49: 180–184.<br />
Johansen, J.D., G. Bernard, E. Gimenez-Arnau, J.P. Lepoittevin, M. Bruze, <strong>and</strong> K.E. Andersen, 2006.<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> elicitation potential <strong>of</strong> chloroatranol <strong>and</strong> atranol—2 allergens in oak moss absolute. Cont.<br />
Dermat., 54: 192–195.<br />
Karlberg, A.-T. et al., 1992. Air oxidation <strong>of</strong> d-limonene (the citrus solvent) creates potent allergens. Cont.<br />
Dermat., 26: 332–340.<br />
Karlberg, A.-T. <strong>and</strong> A. Dooms-Goossens, 1992. Contact allergy to oxidized d-limonene among dermatitis<br />
patients. Cont. Dermat., 36: 201–206.<br />
Larsen, W., H. Nakayama, M. Lindberg, et al., 1996. Fragrance contact dermatitis. A worldwide multicentre<br />
investigation (Part I). Am. J. Cont. Dermat., 7: 77–83.<br />
Memor<strong>and</strong>um on the SCCNFP Opinion concerning Fragrance Allergy in Consumers adopted by the SCCNFP<br />
during the 16th Plenary Meeting <strong>of</strong> March 13, 2001.<br />
Proposal for a Regulation <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Council on flavourings <strong>and</strong> certain food ingredients<br />
with flavouring properties for use in <strong>and</strong> on foods (COM(2006) 427 final. DG Sanco, Brussels,<br />
28.7.2006). Current Flavouring Directive: Council Directive 88/388/EC <strong>of</strong> June 22, 1988 on the approximation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the laws <strong>of</strong> the Member States relating to flavourings for use in foodstuffs <strong>and</strong> to source<br />
materials for their production (OJ L 184, 15.7.1988, p. 61).<br />
Regulation (EC) No. 1336/2008 <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> 16 December 2008 amending<br />
Regulation (EC) No. 648/2004 in order to adapt it to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 on classification,<br />
labelling <strong>and</strong> packaging <strong>of</strong> substances <strong>and</strong> mixtures. OJ L 354, 31.12.2008, p. 60.<br />
Regulation (EC) No. 648/2004 <strong>of</strong> the European Parliament <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> March 31, 2004 on detergents<br />
(OJ L 104, 8.4.2004, p. 1).<br />
SCCNFP Opinion concerning Oakmoss/Treemoss Extracts <strong>and</strong> Appropriate Consumer Information adopted by<br />
the SCCNFP during the 14th plenary meeting <strong>of</strong> October 24, 2000.<br />
SCCNFP/0017/98 Final <strong>of</strong> December 1999: SCCNFP opinion concerning: Fragrance allergy in consumers—a<br />
review <strong>of</strong> the problem: Analysis <strong>of</strong> the need for appropriate consumer information <strong>and</strong> identification <strong>of</strong><br />
consumer allergens.<br />
SCCNFP/0202/99: SCCNFP Opinion concerning the interim position on fragrance allergy—adopted by the<br />
Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products <strong>and</strong> Non-food Products intended for Consumers during the<br />
plenary session <strong>of</strong> June 23, 1999.<br />
SCCP/00847/04: SCCP Opinion on atranol <strong>and</strong> chloroatranol present in natural extracts (e.g., oak moss <strong>and</strong><br />
tree moss extract), adopted by the SCCP during the 2nd plenary meeting <strong>of</strong> December 7, 2004.<br />
Santussi, B., A. Cristaudo, C. Cannistraci, <strong>and</strong> M. Picardo, 1987. Contact dermatitis to fragrances. Cont.<br />
Dermat., 16: 93–95.<br />
Schnuch, A., J. Geier, W. Uter, et al., 1997. National rates <strong>and</strong> regional differences in sensitization to allergens<br />
<strong>of</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ard series. Population adjusted frequencies <strong>of</strong> sensitization (PAFS) in 40,000 patients from a<br />
multicenter study (IVDK). Cont. Dermat., 37: 200–209.<br />
Schnuch, A., J. Geier, W. Uter, <strong>and</strong> P.J. Frosch, 2002. Another look at allergies to fragrances: Frequencies <strong>of</strong> sensitization<br />
to the fragrance mix <strong>and</strong> its constituents. Results from the IVDK. Exogenous Dermatol., 1: 231–237.<br />
Schnuch, A., H. Lessmann, J. Geier, P.J. Frosch, <strong>and</strong> W. Uter, 2004. Contact allergy to fragrances: Frequencies<br />
<strong>of</strong> sensitization from 1996 to 2002. Results <strong>of</strong> the IVDK. Cont. Dermat., 50: 65–76.<br />
Schnuch, A., W. Uter, J. Geire, H. Lessmann, <strong>and</strong> P.J. Frosch, 2007. Sensitization to 26 fragrances to be labelled<br />
according to current European regulation. Cont. Dermat., 57: 1–10.
Index<br />
Note: (Alphanumeric/numeric character) indicates figure subset serial number.<br />
A<br />
A-549 (human lung carcinoma cell line), 237, 239<br />
Abiatae, 906<br />
Abies balsamea, 237<br />
Absidia coerulea, 770, 775, 776<br />
Absidia glauca, 765<br />
Absolutes, 844, 937<br />
Acanthus-leaved thistle, 253<br />
Acetic acid-induced writhing test, 240, 242<br />
2,3-di-O-Acetyl-6-O-tert-butyldimethylsilylβ-cyclodextrin,<br />
17<br />
Achillea biebersteinii, 261<br />
Achillea ligustica, 261<br />
Achillea millefolium, 891<br />
Achillea schischkinii, 243<br />
Achillea sp., 48, 494<br />
ACHN, 237<br />
Acorus gramineus Sol<strong>and</strong>er (Acoraceae), 300, 302<br />
Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, 320<br />
Activated charcoal, 9<br />
Acyclic monoterpene<br />
metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong>, 587<br />
alcohols, 588<br />
aldehydes, 588<br />
hydrocarbons, 587<br />
Acyclic monoterpenoids, 587<br />
Adamantanes, biotransformation <strong>of</strong>, 823–828<br />
Addind spice<br />
with natural aromas, in balanced way, 865<br />
Adenosine triphosphate, 122<br />
Aderton, Charles, 846<br />
ADT. See Agar diffusion test (ADT)<br />
Aeolanthus suaveolens, 301<br />
Afan, 261<br />
Aframomum giganteum, 65<br />
African brasil, Lamiaceae, 249<br />
9(15)-Africanene (117a) biotransformation<br />
by Aapergillus niger, 762<br />
by Rhizopus oryzae, 762<br />
African juniper, 264<br />
African pepper, 262<br />
African sage, 264<br />
African wormwood, 261<br />
Agar diffusion test (ADT), 354<br />
anise oil, 356–359<br />
bitter fennel, 365–369<br />
caraway oil, 372–376<br />
cassia oil, 380<br />
Ceylon cinnamon bark oil, 383–386<br />
Ceylon cinnamon leaf oil, 390<br />
citronella oil, 393–396<br />
clary sage oil, 400<br />
clove leaf oil, 404–408<br />
cori<strong>and</strong>er oil, 414–418<br />
dwarf pine oil, 421<br />
eucalyptus oil, 423–425<br />
juniper oil, 429–430<br />
lavender oil, 434–436<br />
lemon oil, 442–446<br />
m<strong>and</strong>arin oil, 451–453<br />
matricaria oil, 455–457<br />
mint oil, 461–463<br />
neroli oil, 465–466<br />
peppermint oil, 474–477<br />
Pinus sylvestris oil, 482–483<br />
rosemary oil, 487–492<br />
star anise oil, 500–501<br />
sweet orange oil, 503–507<br />
tea tree oil, 512<br />
thyme oils, 521–524<br />
Agathosma, 252<br />
Agathosma collina, 252<br />
Agricultural crop establishment, 92–94<br />
Ajowan, 267<br />
Ajwain, 267<br />
Alambique Vial Gattefossé, 88<br />
Aldehydes, 904<br />
formation <strong>of</strong>, 124<br />
Alembic à bain-marie, 88<br />
Alertness <strong>and</strong> attention, fragrances influences<br />
on, 290–293<br />
Alganite, 858, 859<br />
Algerian oregano, 266<br />
Alleged allergens,classification <strong>of</strong>, 923<br />
Allergenic fragrances, 922<br />
Allergen labelling issue, 925<br />
Allergies, 562<br />
Allium sativum, 884<br />
Allium schoenoprasum, 884<br />
Alloaromadendrene (57) bitrasformation<br />
by Bacillus megaterium, 754<br />
by Glomerella cingulata, 755<br />
by Mycobacterium smegmatis, 754<br />
4-Allyl-1,2-dimethoxy-benzene, 930<br />
1-Allyl-4-methoxybenzene, 930<br />
Allyl isothiocyanate, 304, 883<br />
Almond, 561<br />
Almonella enteritidis, 888<br />
Aloin, 930<br />
Alopecia areata, 575<br />
Aloysia gratissima, 245<br />
α-amylase, 864<br />
α-amyl-cinnamic aldehyde, 922<br />
α-<strong>and</strong> β-thujone, 225–226, 228<br />
α-bisabolol, 138, 272<br />
949
950 Index<br />
α block, 285<br />
α-cadinol, 239<br />
α-copaene, 250<br />
α-cyclocostunolide (169), 771<br />
α-damascone (525), 825<br />
α-episantonin (198), 775, 776<br />
α-eudesmol (153), 767<br />
α-eudesmol, 306<br />
α-farnesene, 238<br />
trans,trans-α-farnesene, 238<br />
α-fenchol, 709<br />
α-glucose unit, <strong>of</strong> cyclodextrin, 15<br />
α-hexylcinnamic aldehyde, 922<br />
α-humulene, 239, 250<br />
α-ionone (513), 824<br />
α-keto-γ-methiolbutyric acid, 262<br />
α-longipinene (433), 806, 810<br />
α-longipinene, 253<br />
α-phell<strong>and</strong>rene, 238, 616<br />
α-pinene, 129, 145–146, 237, 253, 254, 259, 261,<br />
262, 264, 265, 303, 587, 677, 709, 717<br />
α rhythm, 285<br />
α-santonin (190), 774, 775<br />
6-epi-α-santonin (190), 776<br />
α-terpinene, 262, 265, 305, 616<br />
α-terpineol, 225, 227, 247, 254, 262, 264, 270, 305, 594,<br />
629, 709, 717<br />
α-terpinolene, 247, 259<br />
α-terpinyl methyl ether, 883<br />
α-tocopherol, 259<br />
α, β-unsaturated ketone, 648, 700<br />
Alpha waves, 285<br />
Alpinia oxyphylla, 739<br />
Alpinia zerumbet (Pers.), 242<br />
Alternaria alternate, 783<br />
Alzheimer’s syndrome, 553<br />
Amber, 849<br />
Ambrox (391), 803<br />
(-)-Ambrox (391), 802, 803, 804<br />
o-Aminobenzoic acid, 127<br />
1-Aminocylopropane-1-carboxylic acid, 262<br />
Amomum, 254<br />
Amyl acetate, 883<br />
Anacetum vulgare, 884<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> essential oils, 151–152<br />
classical analytical techniques, 152–156<br />
general considerations, 177<br />
modern analytical techniques, 156–157<br />
fast GC for essential oil analysis, 159–162<br />
GC <strong>and</strong> linear retention indices, use <strong>of</strong>, 157–158<br />
GC enantiomer characterization, 164–165<br />
GC-mass spectrometry, 158–159<br />
GC-olfactometry for the assessment <strong>of</strong><br />
odor-active components <strong>of</strong> essential<br />
oils, 162–164<br />
LC <strong>and</strong> LC-MS, 165–167<br />
MDGC techniques, 167–174<br />
MDLC techniques, 174–176<br />
on-line LC-GC, 176–177<br />
Analytical Working Group, <strong>of</strong> IFRA, 921<br />
Anethole, 128, 272, 883<br />
trans-Anethole, 884, 305<br />
Angelica sinensis, 885<br />
Animal models, EOs effects in, 299<br />
Anisaldehyde, 128, 844<br />
m-Anisaldehyde, 884<br />
Anise, 884<br />
Anise oil, 534<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 356–359<br />
obtained in dilution test, 360–363<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 364<br />
Anisyl alcohol, 922, 925<br />
Anonaceae, 238, 262<br />
Anthranilic acid, 127<br />
Anti-inflammation, 338–339<br />
Antimicrobial growth promoters, 890<br />
Antinociception, function <strong>of</strong>, 239<br />
Antitussive, 334<br />
Antoine Chiris, 844<br />
Aphids, 885<br />
Apiaceae, 65, 263, 264, 267, 272<br />
Apis mellifera, 253<br />
Apoptotic cell death, 238<br />
Apothecaries, 556<br />
Appetizer <strong>and</strong> finger food recipes<br />
crudities, 873<br />
Maria’s Dip, 873<br />
Tapenade, 873–874<br />
T<strong>of</strong>u Aromanaise, 874<br />
Veggie Skewers, 874–875<br />
Apple Cake Rose, 878<br />
Appropriate physical process, 934<br />
Apricot kernel, 561<br />
Aqueous essence, 114<br />
Aquifoliaceae, 270<br />
Arachidonic acid, 125<br />
Aristolane sesquiterpenoids, 751<br />
(+)-1(10)-Aristolene (36), 749–754<br />
1(10)-Aristolene (36) biotransformation<br />
by Aspergillus niger, 752, 753<br />
by Bacillus megaterium, 753<br />
by Chlorella fusca, 751<br />
by Diplodia gossypina, 753<br />
by Mucor species, 752<br />
Aristolochia mollissima, 239<br />
Aristolochia species, 750<br />
Aristolochiaceae, 239, 243<br />
Aromachology, 551<br />
Aroma shake, with Herbs, 869<br />
Aromadendr-1(10),9-diene (82) biotransformation<br />
by Curvularia lunata, 758<br />
Aromadendra-9-one (80) biotransformation<br />
by Curvularia lunata, 757<br />
10-epi-Aromadendra-9-one (81) by Curvularia<br />
lunata, 757<br />
Aromadendrene (56) biotransformation<br />
by Bacillus megaterium, 754<br />
by Glomerella cingulata, 755<br />
by Mycobacterium smegmatis, 754<br />
Aromatherapy, 551, 549<br />
blending <strong>of</strong>, 561<br />
chemical agents, 575<br />
clinical studies, 569–570<br />
common fragrance components, 567–568<br />
cosmetologic, precursors <strong>of</strong>, 554–555<br />
definition, 550–551<br />
false claims, 563
Index 951<br />
historical background, 553–554<br />
incense, in Ancient Egypt, 554<br />
perfumed oil producing method, 555<br />
internal usage, 561–562<br />
massage, 559–560<br />
medicinal uses, 555<br />
middle ages, 556<br />
modern perfumery, 557<br />
past clinical studies, 571–575<br />
perfume <strong>and</strong> cosmetics, 554–555<br />
placebo effect, 564<br />
practices, 557–558<br />
methods, 558<br />
psychophysiology, 563–564<br />
recent clinical studies, 570<br />
in dementia, 570–571<br />
safety issue in, 565<br />
scientific evidence, 551–553<br />
selected toxicities, 568–569<br />
synthetic components, 562<br />
therapeutic claims, 562–563<br />
toxicity<br />
in humans, 566–567<br />
young children, 568<br />
in UK <strong>and</strong> US, 550<br />
Aromatic compounds, biotransformation <strong>of</strong>, 828–835<br />
Aromatic plants, 85<br />
as sedatives or stimulants, 297–299<br />
Aromatology, 551<br />
Aroma-Vital Cuisine recipies, 868<br />
addind apice<br />
with natural aromas, in balanced way, 865<br />
appetizer <strong>and</strong> finger food<br />
crudities, 873<br />
Maria’s dip, 873<br />
Tapenade, 873–874<br />
T<strong>of</strong>u Aromanaise, 874<br />
Veggie Skewers, 874–875<br />
basics<br />
Crispy Coconut Flakes (Flexible Asian Spice<br />
Variation), 868<br />
Gomasio (A Sesame Sea-Salt Spice), 868–869<br />
Honey Provencal, 869<br />
beverages<br />
Aroma Shake, with Herbs, 869<br />
Earl Grey, at His Best, 869–870<br />
Lara’s Jamu, 870<br />
Rose-Cider, 870–871<br />
Syrup Mint-Orange, 871<br />
culinary arts<br />
on Exquisite Ingredients <strong>and</strong> Accomplished<br />
Rounding, 864<br />
culinary trip, 866<br />
dessert, cakes <strong>and</strong> baked goods<br />
Apple Cake Rose, 878<br />
Chocolate Fruits <strong>and</strong> Leaves, 878–879<br />
Homemade Fresh Berry Jelly, 879<br />
Rose Semifreddo, 879–880<br />
Sweet Florentine, 880<br />
emulsifiers <strong>and</strong> administering forms, 865<br />
entrees<br />
salads, 872–873<br />
soups, 871<br />
essential oils, to lift spirits, 866<br />
main course<br />
Celery Lemon Grass Patties, 875<br />
Chévre Chaude-Goat Cheese “Provence”, with<br />
Pineapple, 875–876<br />
Crispy Wild Rice-Chapatis, 876<br />
Mango–Dates–Orange Chutney, 876–877<br />
Prawns Bergamot, 877–878<br />
quality criteria <strong>and</strong> specifics<br />
while H<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, for Food<br />
Preparation, 864–865<br />
quantity, 865<br />
recipies, 868<br />
résumé, 880<br />
storage, 865<br />
Arousal, 284<br />
Artemisia, 260<br />
Artemisia absinthium, 260, 884, 885<br />
Artemisia abyssinica, 261<br />
Artemisia afra, 261<br />
Artemisia annua, 788, 885<br />
Artemisia arborescens L., 246<br />
Artemisia douglasiana, 245<br />
Artemisia dracunculus, 329<br />
Artemisia molinieri, 261<br />
Artemisia santonicum, 260, 261<br />
Artemisia scoparia, 885<br />
Artemisia spicigera, 260, 261<br />
Artemisia vulgaris, 92<br />
Artemisinin (283), 788, 790<br />
Arvensis, 901<br />
Asarone (558), 828<br />
Ascaridol, 261<br />
Asclepiadaceae, 245<br />
Ascorbic acid, 256<br />
Asiasari radix, 243<br />
Asparagus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis, 770, 775, 776<br />
Aspergillus alliaceus, 787, 789<br />
Aspergillus awamori IFO 4033, 783<br />
Aspergillus cellulosae, 607, 746, 747, 765, 767, 768, 771,<br />
772, 773, 780, 792, 824<br />
Aspergillus fl avipes, 765<br />
Aspergillus niger, 587, 720, 721, 738, 741, 756, 765, 767,<br />
768, 783, 769, 771, 772, 773, 777, 778, 779,<br />
780, 788, 790, 791, 792, 802, 804, 808, 810,<br />
812, 817, 818, 824<br />
Aspergillus orysae, 804<br />
Aspergillus quardilatus, 776, 778<br />
Aspergillus sojae, 690, 747<br />
Aspergillus spp., 720<br />
Aspergillus terreus, 783, 824<br />
Aspergillus usami, 690<br />
Aspergillus wentii, 743, 764, 766<br />
Aspirin®, 243<br />
Asteraceae, 46–52, 237, 243, 245, 246, 253, 260, 261<br />
Asthmaweed, 248<br />
Atractylodes lancea, 765, 797<br />
Atractylodis rhizoma, 766<br />
atractylon (163), 769<br />
Atranol, 123, 923<br />
structures <strong>of</strong>, 924<br />
Attentional functions, fragrances influences on, 290–293<br />
Attenuated reflection IR spectroscopy, 28<br />
Ayurveda, 863<br />
Azoricus thyme, 259
952 Index<br />
B<br />
B16F10 (mouse cell line), 237<br />
Bacilli Chalmette Guerin, 252<br />
Bacillus megaterium, 751, 754, 755<br />
Bacillus subtilis, 804<br />
Backhousia citriodora, 318, 320<br />
Baill, 240<br />
Balm <strong>of</strong> Gilhead, 554<br />
Balsam fir oil, 237, 238<br />
Balsamodendron myrrha, 554<br />
Balsamodendron opobalsamum, 554<br />
Bark oils, 91<br />
Barton, D. H. R., 4<br />
Basic recipes<br />
crispy coconut flakes (flexible asian spice<br />
variation), 868<br />
gomasio (a sesame sea-salt spice),<br />
868–869<br />
honey provencal, 869<br />
Basil, 270, 563<br />
Bazzania species, 792<br />
Bazzania pompeana, 792<br />
Beauvaria bassiana, 765, 767, 785, 786, 787<br />
Beckley, V.A., 901<br />
Bel-7402, 237<br />
Benzene, as a feedstock for shikimates, 143<br />
p-Benzoquinone, 243<br />
Benzydamine hydrochloride, 322<br />
Benzyl alcohol, 922, 923, 925<br />
Benzyl benzoate, 922, 925<br />
Benzyl cinnamate, 923<br />
Benzyl salicylate, 922, 923, 925<br />
Bergamot oil, 17, 291, 848, 884<br />
Bergapten, 128<br />
Berlocque dermatitis, 567<br />
Berthelot, M., 4<br />
β-acoradiene, 250<br />
β-asarone, 298, 305<br />
β-barbatene (371), 799<br />
β-bisabolene, 272<br />
β-bisabolol (282a), 788<br />
β-carotene bleaching test, 257, 259, 264<br />
β-carotene, 256<br />
β-caryophyllene, 238, 239, 250, 253, 265,<br />
268, 269<br />
(-)-β-caryophyllene, 821<br />
(-)-β-caryophyllene (451), 819<br />
(-)-β-caryophyllene epoxide (453), 814<br />
β-citronellol, 236<br />
β-cyclocostunolide (170), 772, 773<br />
β-damascone (531), 825<br />
β-d-mannuronic acid (M), 859<br />
β-elemene, 239<br />
β-eudesmene, 306<br />
β-eudesmol (157), 767, 768<br />
β-eudesmol, 299, 305<br />
β-pinene, 147, 253, 680, 709<br />
β rhythm, 285<br />
β-selinene (138), 763<br />
Betula alba, 331<br />
Beverage recipes<br />
Aroma Shake, with Herbs, 869<br />
Earl Grey, at His Best, 869–870<br />
Lara’s Jamu, 870<br />
Rose-Cider, 870–871<br />
Syrup Mint-Orange, 871<br />
BHA. See Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA)<br />
BHT. See Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT)<br />
Bicuculline, 243<br />
Bicyclic monoterpene, 677<br />
alcohol, 690<br />
aldehyde, 689<br />
ketones, 700<br />
Bicyclogermacrene, 250<br />
Bicyclohumulenone (357), 798<br />
Billot, M., 850<br />
BIOLANDES, 111<br />
Biologically active substances, 926<br />
Bio-oils, 116<br />
Biosynthetic pathways, 121–123<br />
Biota orientalis, 792<br />
Birch oil, 883<br />
(E)-g-Bisabolene, 239<br />
Bitter fennel, 534<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 365–369<br />
obtained in dilution test, 370<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 371<br />
Black cumin, 237, 240, 268<br />
Black cumin seeds, 251<br />
Black sage, 253<br />
Blue gum eucalyptus, 249<br />
Blue mint bush, 260<br />
Blue mountain sage, 264<br />
Blume syn., 270<br />
Bog myrtle, 238<br />
Boiga irregularis, 884<br />
Boiss, 241<br />
Borage seed, 561<br />
Boraginaceae, 253<br />
Borago <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis, 561<br />
Borneol, 305, 696, 713, 717<br />
Bornyl acetate, 304, 719<br />
Boswellia carterii, 554<br />
Boswellia thurifera, 554<br />
Botanical source, <strong>of</strong> the essential oil, 117<br />
Botryodiplodia theobromae, 738, 741<br />
Botryosphaeria dothidea, 738, 741, 746, 769, 772, 773,<br />
783, 784, 824<br />
Botrytis cinerea, 594, 595, 754, 783, 805, 806, 810, 811,<br />
815, 816, 821<br />
Bottrospicatol, 717<br />
Bradham, Caleb, 846<br />
Brain imaging techniques, 296<br />
British Pharmacopoeia, 353<br />
Bronchoalveolar lavage, 251<br />
Bronchodilation <strong>and</strong> airway hyperresponsiveness,<br />
335–336<br />
Brown process, 98<br />
Buddleja cordobensis, 246<br />
Bulinus truncates, 885<br />
Bulnesol (232), 779<br />
Burseraceae, 247, 554<br />
Bush distillation device, 100<br />
Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), 257, 266, 270<br />
Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), 257, 267, 268, 269, 270,<br />
273, 274
Index 953<br />
C<br />
C4-epimer (221), 778<br />
Caco-2, 237<br />
Cadbury, 846<br />
Cadina-4,10(15)-dien-3-one (265), 786, 787<br />
Cadinol (281), 787<br />
Caespititius, 259<br />
Cajeput, 254, 552, 885<br />
Calamenene, 250<br />
Calendula, 561, 884<br />
Calendula <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis, 561<br />
Calonectria decora, 761<br />
Camphene, 210, 237, 259, 719<br />
(±)-Camphene, 686<br />
1,2-Campholide, 719<br />
Camphor thyme, 259<br />
Camphor tree, 250<br />
Camphor, 4, 210–212, 261, 552, 713, 717, 885<br />
Camphorweed, 245<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ia albicans, 788<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ia rugosa, 804<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ia tropicalis, 804<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida albicans, 779<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ida treatments, 562<br />
C<strong>and</strong>ler, Asa, 846<br />
Cape ivy, 237<br />
Capitate trichomes, 40<br />
Capsaicin, 243, 883<br />
Capsaicin (596), 832, 833<br />
Capsicum annuum, 832<br />
Caraway oil, 534, 889<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 372–376<br />
obtained in dilution test, 377–378<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 379<br />
Carbocation, 131<br />
Carbonated lemonade flavoured, with lemon juice, 845<br />
Carbowax 20M, 17<br />
Cardamom, 250, 254<br />
3-Carene, 688<br />
Carlina acanthifolia, 253<br />
Carotenoids, 139, 140<br />
Carrageenin edema test, 240<br />
Carum carvi, 268, 325, 889<br />
Carum nigrum, 268<br />
Carvacrol, 212, 238, 260, 268, 272, 306, 884, 886, 887<br />
Carvacrol (583), 831<br />
Carvacrol methyl ether, 633, 712<br />
Carveol, 236, 634, 717<br />
Carvomenthol, 646, 717<br />
Carvone, 213, 304, 711, 717, 720, 887<br />
Carvone-8,9-epoxide, 717<br />
Carvonhydrate, 717<br />
Carvotanacetol, 717, 720<br />
Carvotanacetone, 709, 712, 715, 717, 720<br />
Caryophyllaceae, 248<br />
Caryophyllene, 227, 229, 238, 250<br />
Caryophyllene oxide, 244, 250, 306<br />
Casaeria sylvestris Sw., 250<br />
CAS number, 906, 907<br />
Caspase-3 activity, 238<br />
Cassia oil, 848<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 380<br />
obtained in dilution test, 381<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 382<br />
Catalase, 256<br />
Caterpillars, 885<br />
Catharanthus roseus, 595, 833<br />
Catherine de Medici, 843, 844<br />
Catnip, 884<br />
Cats, 883<br />
Causae et Curae, 556<br />
CCC. See Countercurrent chromatography (CCC)<br />
Cedar <strong>of</strong> libanon, 246<br />
Cedarwood, 884, 885<br />
Cedrol (414), 809, 821<br />
Cedrus atlantica, 575, 885<br />
Cedrus deodara, 246<br />
Cedrus libani A., 246<br />
Cedus atlantica, 886<br />
Celery Lemon Grass Patties, 875<br />
Celery oil, limonene identification<br />
by 13 C-NMR spectroscopy, 30<br />
Celite, 9<br />
Central nervous system, essential oils effects in, 281<br />
activation <strong>and</strong> arousal, 284<br />
fragrances <strong>and</strong> EOs<br />
on brain potentials indicative <strong>of</strong> arousal, 285–290<br />
on cognitive functions, 290–296<br />
psychopharmacology <strong>of</strong> essential oils, 297<br />
in animal models, 299<br />
aromatic plants, as sedatives or stimulants,<br />
297–299<br />
mechanism <strong>of</strong> action, 302–306<br />
Cephalosporium aphidicoda, 755, 803, 805, 808, 821<br />
Ceylon cinnamon bark oil, 534<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 383–386<br />
obtained in dilution test, 387–388<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 389<br />
Ceylon cinnamon leaf oil, 534<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 390<br />
obtained in dilution test, 391<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 392<br />
Chaemomelum nobile, 329<br />
Chaetomium cochlioides, 807, 812<br />
Chaetomium globosum, 743<br />
Chamaecyparis obtusa, 820<br />
Chamaemelum nobile, 331<br />
Chamomile, 67, 891<br />
Charcoal, activated, 9<br />
Charles, King V, 843<br />
CHARM (combined hedonic aroma response<br />
method), 162<br />
Chemistry <strong>of</strong> essential oils, 121<br />
basic biosynthetic pathways, 121–123<br />
polyketides <strong>and</strong> lipids, 123–126<br />
shikimic acid derivatives, 126–129<br />
synthesis, 140–149<br />
terpenoids, 129–130<br />
hemiterpenoids, 131<br />
monoterpenoids, 131–135<br />
sesquiterpenoids, 135–140<br />
Chemotaxonomy, 41–42<br />
Chemotherapeutic agents, 239
954 Index<br />
Chenopodium ambrosioides, 890<br />
Chévre Chaude-Goat Cheese “Provence”, with Pineapple,<br />
875–876<br />
Chewing gum, 846<br />
Chinese eucalyptus oils, 86<br />
Chiral GC, 13–15<br />
Chives, 884<br />
Chloratranol, 123<br />
Chlorella ellipsoidea, 823<br />
Chlorella fusca, 738, 739, 750<br />
Chlorella pyrenoidosa, 739, 740, 823, 824, 825<br />
Chlorella salina, 823<br />
Chlorella sorokiniana, 823<br />
Chlorella vulgaris, 740, 823<br />
Chlorhexamed®, 321<br />
Chloroatranol, 923<br />
structures <strong>of</strong>, 924<br />
Chocolate Fruits <strong>and</strong> Leaves, 878–879<br />
Chromatographic separation techniques, 11<br />
countercurrent chromatography, 20<br />
droplet countercurrent chromatography, 20<br />
rotation locular countercurrent chromatography,<br />
20–21<br />
gas chromatography, 12<br />
chiral GC, 13–15<br />
comprehensive multidimensional GC, 18<br />
fast <strong>and</strong> ultrafast GC, 13<br />
two-dimensional GC, 15–18<br />
liquid column chromatography, 18<br />
high-performance liquid column<br />
chromatography, 19<br />
preseparation, <strong>of</strong> essential oils, 18–19<br />
supercritical fluid chromatography, 20<br />
thin-layer chromatography, 12<br />
Chrysanthemum boreale, 238<br />
Chrysanthemum sibiricum, 248<br />
Chrysanthemum spp., 884<br />
Cidreira, 297<br />
p-Cimen-8-ol, 247<br />
Cineole, 133–134<br />
1,4-Cineole, 213–214, 261, 715, 720<br />
1,8-Cineole, 214, 216, 244, 247, 250, 254, 260, 261, 262,<br />
293, 298, 303, 563, 715, 720, 884, 885<br />
1,8-Cineole-2-malonyl ester, 720<br />
Cinnamaldehyde, 272, 883, 884, 887<br />
Cinnamic acid, 128, 922<br />
Cinnamodial (303), 792<br />
Cinnamomum camphora, 331<br />
Cinnamomum camphora ct 1,8-cineole, 320<br />
Cinnamomum osmophloeum, 250<br />
Cinnamomum verum, 270<br />
Cinnamomum zeylanicum, 65, 270, 317<br />
Cinnamon, 65, 254, 270, 848, 887<br />
Cinnamon leaf, 848<br />
Cinnamosma fragrans, 791<br />
Cinnamyl tiglate, 248<br />
Circulatory distillation apparatus, 5<br />
Cistus ladaniferus, 554<br />
Citral, 147–148, 216–217, 304, 588, 590, 714, 883, 884<br />
Citronella, 200, 217, 271, 306, 588, 714, 883, 884<br />
Citronella oil, 113<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 393–396<br />
obtained in dilution test, 397–398<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 399<br />
(+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-Citronellal, 588<br />
Citronellene, 588, 717, 720<br />
Citronellic acid, 590<br />
Citronellol, 133, 249, 306, 588, 883, 923<br />
(+)- <strong>and</strong> (-)-Citronellol, 588<br />
Citronellyl acetate<br />
fermentation <strong>of</strong>, 594<br />
Citronellyl formate, 249<br />
Citronellyl nitrile, 883<br />
Citrus aurantium, 263, 318<br />
Citrus bergamia, 883, 884<br />
Citrus EOs, 297<br />
Citrus fruit<br />
oil cells <strong>of</strong>, 96<br />
parts <strong>of</strong>, 96<br />
Citrus limon, 322, 331<br />
Citrus oil, 65, 91, 883<br />
Citrus pathogenic fungi, 608, 720<br />
Citrus peel, 95, 96, 888<br />
Citrus sinensis, 236, 331<br />
Citrus sinesis, 263<br />
Citrus yuko, 263<br />
Citrus-based aromas, 301<br />
Civet, 849<br />
Cladosporium resinae, 765<br />
Cladosporium sp., 608<br />
Clary sage oil, 534, 848<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 400<br />
obtained in dilution test, 401–402<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 403<br />
Classical analytical techniques, 152–156<br />
Climate, 89–90<br />
Clinical aromatherapy, 555<br />
Clobetasol propionate, 254<br />
Cloning, 94–95<br />
Clostridium perfringens, 887<br />
Clove, 250, 848<br />
Clove buds, 89, 885, 887<br />
Clove leaf oil, 534, 899<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 404–408<br />
obtained in dilution test, 409–412<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 413<br />
from Madagascar, 895<br />
CLP Regulation, 936<br />
13<br />
C-NMR spectroscopy, 28–30<br />
CNV. See Contingent negative variation (CNV)<br />
CO25 (N-ras transformed mouse myoblast<br />
cell line), 237<br />
Coca-Cola, 846<br />
Cocos nucifera, 561<br />
Code <strong>of</strong> Practice (CoP), 909, 910<br />
Coenzyme-A, 122<br />
Cold expression, 95<br />
Cold-pressed lemon-peel oil, 27<br />
Cold pressing, 5<br />
Colgate, William, 844<br />
Colgate–Palmolive Company, 844<br />
Colgate–Palmolive liquid soaps, 849<br />
Colgate–Palmolive–Peet company, 844<br />
Collectotrichum phomoides, 764<br />
Collectotrium phomoides, 766
Index 955<br />
Colletotrichum lindemuthianum, 783<br />
Colpermin®, 327<br />
Combined hedonic aroma response method. See CHARM<br />
(combined hedonic aroma response method)<br />
Commercial essential oil extraction methods, 95<br />
expression, 95–99<br />
steam distillation, 99–117<br />
Commiphora myrrha, 554<br />
Commiphora opobalsamum, 554<br />
Commission Directive 93/21/EEC, 928<br />
Commission Proposal, 928, 929, 932, 933<br />
appropriate physical process, 934<br />
flavouring preparation, 934–935<br />
natural flavoring substance, 933<br />
Compositae (Asteraceae), 67<br />
Compounds isopiperitenone, 718<br />
Comprehensive liquid chromatography (LC × LC), 174<br />
Comprehensive multidimensional GC, 18<br />
Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography<br />
(GC × GC), 171, 172–174<br />
Comunelles, 94<br />
Concentrated oil, 114<br />
Concolina, 97<br />
Concretes, 844<br />
Constituent-based evaluation, 187<br />
Contaminations, 70<br />
Contingent negative variation (CNV), 289–290<br />
Conyza bonariensis, 248<br />
Copper still, in East Africa, 897<br />
Cordia verbenacea, 253, 253<br />
Cori<strong>and</strong>er oil, 535, 899<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 414–418<br />
obtained in dilution test, 419–420<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 420<br />
Corido thyme, 260<br />
Coridothymus capitatus, 888<br />
Cornmint oil, 221<br />
safety evaluation <strong>of</strong>, 197, 200–204<br />
Corynesphora cassiicola, 805, 821<br />
Corynespora cassiicola, 607<br />
Cosmetic <strong>and</strong> Detergent Legislation <strong>and</strong> Allergen<br />
Labeling, 918–920<br />
Cosmetic Directive<br />
<strong>and</strong> its Seventh Amendment, 920–921<br />
Extracts <strong>and</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> <strong>and</strong> Aromatic Natural<br />
Raw Materials<br />
impacts on, 921–922<br />
First amendment <strong>of</strong>, 925–926<br />
Sensitization to Fragrances, Data on, 922–925<br />
Cosmetic Directive<br />
<strong>and</strong> its Seventh Amendment, 920–921<br />
Cosmetics, 568<br />
Costunolide (165), 767, 769, 770<br />
Coumarin, 844, 930<br />
Council Directive 79/831/EEC, 911<br />
Council proposal, 928, 929, 932<br />
appropriate physical process, 934<br />
natural flavoring substance, 933<br />
flavouring preparation, 935<br />
Countercurrent chromatography (CCC), 20<br />
droplet countercurrent chromatography (DCCC), 20, 21<br />
rotation locular countercurrent chromatography<br />
(RLCC), 20–21<br />
Countries producing essential oils, 84–85<br />
COX-2. See Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)<br />
CPE. See Cytopathic effect (CPE)<br />
Creeping sage, 264<br />
Creeping thyme, 260<br />
CRINA ® Pigs, 889<br />
CRINA Poultry Study, 887–888<br />
Crispy Coconut Flakes (Flexible Asian Spice Variation), 868<br />
Crispy Wild Rice-Chapatis, 876<br />
Crithmum maritimum, 264<br />
Croton cajucara, 247<br />
Croton fl avens L., 239<br />
Croton nepetaefolius, 240, 337<br />
Croton sonderianus, 243<br />
Croton urucurana, 271, 272<br />
Crudities, 873<br />
Cryogenic trapping, 8<br />
Cryptococcus ne<strong>of</strong>ormans, 779, 788<br />
Cryptoporic acids (307–317, 316), 793<br />
Cryptoporus volvatus, 791, 792<br />
Cryptosporidium, 885<br />
Cryptotaenia japonica, 272<br />
Cryptotenia canadensis, 763<br />
CT-26 (different human cancer cell lines), 237<br />
Culinary arts<br />
on exquisite ingredients <strong>and</strong> accomplished<br />
rounding, 864<br />
Cultivation measures, 69<br />
Cumin, 263<br />
Cuminaldehyde, 621<br />
Cuminum cyminum, 263<br />
Cunninghamella bainieri, 770, 775<br />
Cunninghamella blakeseeana, 763<br />
Cunninghamella blakesleeana, 769<br />
Cunninghamella echinulata, 768, 770, 775, 779, 780, 782,<br />
788, 790<br />
Cunninghamella elegans, 763, 788, 790, 803, 806, 811<br />
Cunninghamella vechinulata, 770<br />
(-)-Cuparene (322), 794<br />
(+)-Cuparene (324), 795<br />
Cupressaceae, 246, 264<br />
Cupressus sempervirens, 331<br />
Curcudiol (282n), 789<br />
(S)-(+)-Curcuphenol (282g), 789<br />
Curcuma aromatica, 761, 763<br />
Curcuma domestica Val., 248<br />
Curcuma longa L., 27, 267<br />
Curcuma wenyujin, 763<br />
Curcuma zedoaria, 761, 763<br />
Curcumin, 261<br />
Curdione (120), 764<br />
Current Flavouring Directive 88/388/EC<br />
“Biologically Active Substances”, Levels <strong>of</strong>, 927<br />
“Natural”, Definition <strong>of</strong>, 927–928<br />
Current Flavouring Directive <strong>and</strong> Future Flavouring<br />
Regulation<br />
Impact, on <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, 926–927<br />
Current Flavouring Directive 88/388/EC<br />
“Biologically Active Substances”, Levels <strong>of</strong>, 927<br />
“Natural”, Definition <strong>of</strong>, 927–928<br />
Future Flavouring Regulation,<br />
“Biologically Active Substances”, Levels <strong>of</strong>,<br />
929–933<br />
“Natural”, Definition <strong>of</strong>, 933–935
956 Index<br />
Curtis, John B., 846<br />
Curvularia lunata, 756, 783, 785, 786, 802, 803<br />
Cyanobacterium, 596, 610<br />
Cyclic monoterpene epoxide, 670<br />
Cyclic monoterpenoids<br />
metabolic pathways <strong>of</strong>, 603<br />
(+)-Cyclocolorenone (98) biotransformation<br />
by Aspergillus niger, 760<br />
(-)-Cyclocolorenone (103) biotransformation<br />
by Aspergillus niger, 760<br />
Cyclodextrin complexation<br />
<strong>of</strong> volatiles, 860<br />
Cyclodextrin derivatives, 14, 16<br />
Cyclodextrin, α-Glucose unit <strong>of</strong>, 15<br />
Cyclodextrins, 859<br />
(+)-Cycloisolongifol-5β-ol (445e) biotransformation<br />
by Cunninghamella elegans, 813, 818<br />
Cyclomyltaylan-5-ol (362), 799<br />
Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), 242<br />
Cylas formicarius, 787<br />
Cymbopogon citratus, 240<br />
Cymbopogon fl exuosa, 569<br />
Cymbopogon giganteus, 249<br />
Cymbopogon winteranus, 218<br />
Cymbopogon winterianus, 884<br />
Cymbopogon winterianus Jowitt (Poaceae), 300<br />
p-Cymene, 132, 247, 251, 253, 261, 262, 265, 268, 272,<br />
305, 712<br />
Cynanchum stauntonii, 245<br />
Cyperaceae, 239<br />
Cyperus rotundus, 239<br />
Cytochrome P-450 biotransformation<br />
by sesquiterpenoids, 819<br />
Cytopathic effect (CPE), 245<br />
D<br />
DAB 6. See “Deutsches Arzneibuch 6” (DAB 6)<br />
Dadai, 263<br />
Damascones, biotransformation <strong>of</strong>, 823–828<br />
Dangerous goods, 908<br />
dangerous substance <strong>and</strong>, 907–908<br />
interrelation between, 908<br />
packing <strong>of</strong>, 908–910<br />
Dangerous substance, 908<br />
consignments <strong>of</strong>, 909<br />
<strong>and</strong> dangerous goods, 907–908<br />
interrelation between, 908<br />
Danio rerio, 568<br />
Dark opal basil, 269<br />
Daucus carota, 320<br />
DB-Wax, 16<br />
DCCC. See Droplet countercurrent chromatography<br />
(DCCC)<br />
De Materia Medica, 555<br />
Deans-type pressure balancing, 17<br />
Decongestants, 552<br />
DEET, 884<br />
Dehydroaromadendrene, 237<br />
8,9-Dehydromenthenone, 718<br />
8,9-Dehydronootkatone (25) biotransformation<br />
by Aspergillus cellulosae, 749<br />
by Aspergillus sojae, 749<br />
by Marchantia polymorpha, 750<br />
(-)-Dehydrocostuslactone (249), 782, 783, 784<br />
Delayed-type hypersensitivity, 253<br />
Δ-3-Carene, 304<br />
Demotic medical papyri, 555<br />
DEN-2, 245, 246<br />
1-Deoxy-d-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase gene, 54<br />
Deoxyribose assay, 258, 265<br />
Deoxyxylulose phosphate reductoisomerase, 54<br />
Dermasport®, 331<br />
Dermatophagoides farina, 317<br />
Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, 317<br />
Dessert, cakes <strong>and</strong> baked good recipes<br />
Apple Cake Rose, 878<br />
Chocolate Fruits <strong>and</strong> Leaves, 878–879<br />
Homemade Fresh Berry Jelly, 879<br />
Rose Semifreddo, 879–880<br />
Sweet Florentine, 880<br />
Desynchronization, 285<br />
Detergent Regulation, First Amendment, 925–926<br />
“Deutsches Arzneibuch 6” (DAB 6), 353<br />
Devil in the bush, 268<br />
Dextran edema test, 240<br />
Diabetes, 562<br />
Dicots, families <strong>of</strong>, 41<br />
Didiscus axeata, 787<br />
Diepoxide, 709<br />
Diethyl nitrosamine, 236<br />
Die Toiletten Chemie, 849<br />
Different human cancer cell lines. See CT-26 (different<br />
human cancer cell lines)<br />
Differential scanning calorimetry, 254<br />
Dihydro-α-santonin (187), 774<br />
Dihdyrocarvone, 717<br />
Dihydroasarone (559), 829<br />
Dihydrobottrospicatol, 718<br />
Dihydrocapsaicin (600), 832, 833<br />
8-nor-Dihydrocapsaicin (601), 833<br />
Dihydrocarveol, 639, 718<br />
Dihydrocarveol-8,9-epoxide, 717, 718<br />
Dihydrocarvone, 718<br />
Dihydrocarvone-8,9-epoxide, 717<br />
Dihydrocitronellol, 590<br />
Dihydr<strong>of</strong>olic acid, 237<br />
Dihydromycenol, 602<br />
Dihydronootkatone (17), 748<br />
Dihydronootkatone (17), biotransformation <strong>of</strong>, 748<br />
1,2-Dihydrophell<strong>and</strong>ral, 620<br />
4,9-Dihydroxy-1-pmenthen-7-oic acid, 718<br />
8,9-Dihydroxy-1-p-menthene, 717<br />
2,9-Dihydroxy-3-pinanone, 709<br />
6,7-Dihydroxyfenchol, 709<br />
2,5-Dihydroxy-pinanone, 709<br />
1,3-Dihydroxythujone, 717<br />
Diisophorone (488a), 819<br />
DIL. See Dilution test (DIL)<br />
Dill, 67, 848<br />
Dillapiol, 247<br />
Dilution test (DIL), 354–355<br />
anise oil, 360–363<br />
bitter fennel, 370<br />
caraway oil, 377–378<br />
cassia oil, 381<br />
Ceylon cinnamon bark oil, 387–388<br />
Ceylon cinnamon leaf oil, 391
Index 957<br />
citronella oil, 397–398<br />
clary sage oil, 401–402<br />
clove leaf oil, 409–412<br />
cori<strong>and</strong>er oil, 419–420<br />
dwarf pine oil, 421<br />
eucalyptus oil, 426–427<br />
juniper oil, 431–432<br />
lavender oil, 437–439<br />
lemon oil, 447–449<br />
m<strong>and</strong>arin oil, 454<br />
matricaria oil, 458–459<br />
neroli oil, 467<br />
nutmeg oil, 469–471<br />
nutmeg oil, 472–473<br />
peppermint oil, 478–480<br />
Pinus sylvestris oil, 484–485<br />
rosemary oil, 493–497<br />
star anise oil, 502<br />
sweet orange oil, 508–510<br />
tea tree oil, 513–519<br />
thyme oils, 525–531<br />
3,7-Dimethyl-1,7-octanediol, 590<br />
3,7-Dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPX), 242<br />
(R)-5,5-Dimethyl-4-(3′-oxobutyl)-4,5-dihydr<strong>of</strong>uran-2-<br />
(3H)-one, 720<br />
3,7-Dimethyl-6-octene-1,2-diol, 720<br />
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 264<br />
3,4-Dimethylvaleric acid, 717<br />
2,4-Dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB), 253<br />
Diol, 720<br />
Dior, 850<br />
Dioscorides, 555<br />
1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl, 251, 257<br />
2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 257, 262, 265,<br />
266, 270, 271<br />
Diplodia gossypina, 587, 607, 720, 751, 754, 807, 813<br />
Diplophyllum species, 792<br />
Diplophyllum serrulatum, 788<br />
1,3-Dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX), 242<br />
Directive 1999/45/EC, 936<br />
Directive 67/548/EEC, 936<br />
Distillates, 844<br />
Distillation, 99, 103, 116<br />
art <strong>of</strong>, 87<br />
extraction apparatus, 7<br />
solvent extraction, 6<br />
Distillation chimie fine aroma process, 110<br />
Distilled oils, 937<br />
Distinctness, uniformity, <strong>and</strong> stability, 64<br />
DLD-1 (human colon adenocarcinoma cell line), 237<br />
DMPX. See 3,7-Dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPX)<br />
DMSO. See Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)<br />
DNA, 52–53<br />
DNA-barcoding, 53<br />
DNCB. See 2,4-Dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB)<br />
Dodge <strong>and</strong> Olcott Inc., 844<br />
Dogs, 883<br />
Domestication <strong>and</strong> systematic cultivation, 59–60<br />
Douglas fir oil, 883<br />
DPCPX. See 1,3-Dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine<br />
(DPCPX)<br />
DPN/DPNH, 122<br />
DPPH. See 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH)<br />
Dr Pepper, 846<br />
Dragon’s blood, 271<br />
drim-9α-Hydroxy-11,12-diacetoxy-7-ene (301), 792<br />
Drimenol (289), 791<br />
Dromiceius novaehol-l<strong>and</strong>iae, 561<br />
Droplet countercurrent chromatography<br />
(DCCC), 20, 21<br />
Dry-column chromatography, 18<br />
Dry distillation, 112<br />
Dumas, M. J., 3<br />
Dunaliella sp., 709<br />
Dunaliella tertiolecta, 592, 824<br />
Dwarf pine oil, 535<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 421<br />
obtained in dilution test, 421<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 422<br />
E<br />
Ear Mites, 885<br />
Earl Grey, at His Best, 869–870<br />
Eau de Cologne, 843<br />
Eau Savage, 850<br />
EC-I, 250<br />
EC-II, 250<br />
EC-III, 250<br />
EC-IV, 250<br />
ECB/JRC (the European Chemical Bureau/Joint Research<br />
Centre <strong>of</strong> the European Commission), 905<br />
EFFA CoP. See European Flavour <strong>and</strong> Fragrance<br />
Association Code <strong>of</strong> Practice (EFFA CoP)<br />
EI-mass spectrum, <strong>of</strong> essential oil, 29<br />
Eimeria, 887<br />
Eimeria tenella, 888<br />
Eimeria furfuracea, 921<br />
Eimeria prunastri, 921<br />
Electroencephalogram, 285<br />
Electron-capture detector, 13<br />
Elemol (495), 821<br />
Elettaria cardamomum, 254, 329, 333<br />
Elionurus elegans, 272<br />
Emulsifiers <strong>and</strong> Administering Forms, 865<br />
Emu oil, 561<br />
Enantioselective GC, 15, 164<br />
Enantioselective multidimensional gas chromatography<br />
(Es-MDGC), 165, 168, 196<br />
Encapsulation, 855<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils<br />
in hydrophilic polymer, 859<br />
procedures, 858<br />
polymer used for, 858<br />
<strong>of</strong> volatiles, 857<br />
Enfleurage, 555<br />
Ennever, W.A., 899<br />
Enterobacter, 738<br />
Enteroplant®, 325<br />
Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, 888<br />
ent-1α-Hydroxy-β-chamigrene (367), 799<br />
Entrée recipes<br />
salads, 872–873<br />
soups, 871<br />
Entry into Force, 932<br />
Enzymatic antioxidants, 256<br />
Epicoccum purpurascens, 746
958 Index<br />
Epidermal carcinoma, 239<br />
Epidermophyton fl occosum, 319<br />
Epi-nepetalactone, 305<br />
Epling, 245<br />
8,9-Epoxy-1-p-menthanol, 709<br />
2,3-Epoxycitronellol, 593<br />
8,9-Epoxydihydrocarveol, 718<br />
8,9-Epoxydihydrocarveyl acetate, 718<br />
6,7-Epoxygeraniol, 593<br />
6,7-Epoxynerol, 593<br />
Eppendorf MicroDistiller®, 8<br />
Eremanthus erythropappus, 243, 253<br />
Eriocephalus dinteri, 253<br />
Eriocephalus ericoides, 253<br />
Eriocephalus klinghardtensis, 253<br />
Eriocephalus luederitzianus, 253<br />
Eriocephalus merxmuelleri, 253<br />
Eriocephalus pinnatus, 253<br />
Eriocephalus scariosus, 253<br />
Escherichia coli, 888<br />
Es-MDGC. See Enantioselective multidimensional gas<br />
chromatography (Es-MDGC)<br />
Essence oil, 114<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oil-bearing plants, 39<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oil combination, 888<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oil mixture, 887<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oil <strong>of</strong> wine yeast, 86<br />
<strong>Essential</strong> oils, phytotherapeutic uses <strong>of</strong>, 315<br />
acaricidal activity, 316–317<br />
allergic rhinitis, 342<br />
anticarcinogenic, 317<br />
antimicrobial<br />
antibacterial, 317–318<br />
antifungal, 318–319<br />
antiviral, 319–320<br />
atopic dermatitis, micr<strong>of</strong>lora controlling<br />
in, 323<br />
fungating wounds, odor management<br />
for, 323<br />
oral cavity, microbes <strong>of</strong>, 320–322<br />
functional dyspepsia, 325–326<br />
gastroesophageal refl ux, 325<br />
hepatic <strong>and</strong> renal stones, dissolution <strong>of</strong><br />
gall <strong>and</strong> biliary tract stones, 323–324<br />
renal stones, 325<br />
hyperlipoproteinemia, 326–327<br />
irritable bowel syndrome, 327–328<br />
nausea, 329<br />
pain relief, 329<br />
dysmenorrhea, 330<br />
headache, 330<br />
infantile colic, 331<br />
joint physiotherapy, 331<br />
nipple pain, 331<br />
osteoarthritis, 331<br />
postherpetic neuralgia, 331–332<br />
postoperative pain, 332<br />
prostatitis, 332<br />
pruritis, 332<br />
pediculicidal activity, 332–333<br />
recurrent aphthous stomatitis, 333<br />
respiratory tract<br />
1,8-cineole, 336–342<br />
menthol, 333–336<br />
snoring, 342<br />
swallowing dysfunction, 342–343<br />
Esters, 904<br />
determination, 155<br />
Estragol, 930, 931<br />
Estragole, 128<br />
Ethers, 904<br />
Ethyl everninate, 123<br />
Ethyl phenylacetate, 884<br />
Ethylalcohol, 250<br />
Etodolac, 250<br />
Eucalyptus camaldulensis, 67<br />
Eucalyptus citriodora, 249<br />
Eucalyptus globules, 331, 333<br />
Eucalyptus globulus, 249, 265, 317, 552, 885<br />
Eucalyptus, 265<br />
Eucalyptus oil, 535, 883<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 423–425<br />
obtained in dilution test, 426–427<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 428<br />
Eucalyptus paucifl ora, 319<br />
Eucalyptus perriniana, 829, 830, 831<br />
Eucalyptus radiate, 320<br />
Eucalyptus tereticornis, 249, 337<br />
EU Commission, 920, 928<br />
Eudesmenes (138, 141, 143), 766<br />
Eudesmenone (152a), 767<br />
Eugenia brasiliensis, 250<br />
Eugenia caryophyllata Thunb (Myrtaceae), 300<br />
Eugenia caryophyllata, 238, 250, 251<br />
Eugenia involucrate, 250<br />
Eugenia jambolana, 250<br />
Eugenol, 238, 250, 269, 298, 303, 884, 887<br />
Eugenol (586), 831<br />
Eugenia oil, 254<br />
Eugenyl acetate, 250<br />
Euglena gracilis, 824, 829<br />
Euglena gracilis Z, 591, 722–723<br />
Euglena sp., 709<br />
EU legislation, on flavors <strong>and</strong> fragrances<br />
cosmetic <strong>and</strong> detergent legislation <strong>and</strong> allergen<br />
labeling, 918–920<br />
aromatic natural raw materials, impacts on,<br />
921–922<br />
cosmetic directive <strong>and</strong> its seventh amendment,<br />
920–921<br />
first amendment <strong>of</strong>, 925–926<br />
sensitization to fragrances, data on, 922–925<br />
current flavouring directive <strong>and</strong> future flavouring<br />
regulation<br />
current flavouring directive 88/388/ec, 927–928<br />
future flavouring regulation, 928–935<br />
impact, on essential oils, 926–927<br />
hazard classification <strong>and</strong> labeling <strong>of</strong>, 935–939<br />
EU Parliament, 928<br />
Eupatorium patens, 245<br />
Euphorbiaceae, 239, 240, 243, 271<br />
European Association <strong>of</strong> the Flavour <strong>and</strong> Fragrance<br />
Industry, 910<br />
European Chemical Bureau/Joint Research Centre <strong>of</strong> the<br />
European Commission. See ECB/JRC<br />
(European Chemical Bureau/Joint Research<br />
Centre <strong>of</strong> the European Commission)
Index 959<br />
European Flavour <strong>and</strong> Fragrance Association Code <strong>of</strong><br />
Practice (EFFA CoP), 909, 925, 935–936<br />
recommendations, 936<br />
European Flavour Industry, 934<br />
European Inventory <strong>of</strong> Existing Commercial Chemical<br />
Substances, 905, 907<br />
used in EU, 907<br />
European List <strong>of</strong> Notified Chemical Substances, 905, 907<br />
European Pharmacopoeia, 353<br />
essential oil monographs in, 882<br />
Eurotium rubrum, 777, 779<br />
Eurotrium purpurasens, 743<br />
Evaporation residue, determination <strong>of</strong>, 154<br />
Expression, 95–99, 555<br />
Exserohilum halodes, 764, 766<br />
Extracts, 844, 849<br />
F<br />
F&F Industry, 921<br />
Fabriek, 843<br />
Fahnestock, Samuel, 845<br />
FairWild, 73<br />
False bottom apparatus, 101<br />
Farina, Jean Maria, 843<br />
Farnesol, 136, 137, 138, 227, 231, 236, 922<br />
2E,6E-Farnesol (478), 823<br />
2Z,6Z-Farnesol (478), 828<br />
trans-Farnesyl acetate, 238<br />
Fast <strong>and</strong> ultrafast GC, 13<br />
Fast GC for essential oil analysis, 159–162<br />
Fe iii tripyridyltriazine, 271<br />
Felix Cola, 849<br />
Fenchol, 697, 709<br />
Fenchone, 217–218, 563, 709<br />
Fenchoquinone, 709<br />
Fenchyl acetate, 697<br />
Fennel oil, 889<br />
Fennel flower, 268<br />
Fennel fruit, 888<br />
Ferric-nitrilo-acetate, 236<br />
Ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), 271<br />
Ferula galbanifl ua, 554<br />
Ferulic acid derivatives, 129<br />
Fetal calf serum, 247<br />
Feverfew, 884<br />
Ficoidaceae, 259<br />
FID. See Flame ionization detector (FID)<br />
Flacourtiaceae, 250<br />
Flame ionization detector (FID), 12<br />
Flammability, 912<br />
Flavine, 256<br />
Flavor <strong>and</strong> Extract Manufacturers Association, 565<br />
Flavoring preparation, 928<br />
Flavors, 845–846<br />
contents, in food products<br />
<strong>and</strong> essential oils, 852<br />
industrial manufactures <strong>of</strong>, 845<br />
Flavors <strong>and</strong> fragrances<br />
leading producers <strong>of</strong>, 849<br />
Flavouring Directive 88/388/EC, 926<br />
Flavoring preparation, 934<br />
Flavoring Regulation, 935<br />
Fleas <strong>and</strong> Ticks, 884<br />
Floral water, 102<br />
Florentine flask, 106<br />
oil <strong>and</strong> muddy water in, 107<br />
Flourencia cernua, 886<br />
Foeniculum vulgare, 329, 330, 331, 888, 889<br />
Folded oil, 114<br />
Food, scope <strong>of</strong> essential oils in, 187<br />
chemical assay requirements <strong>and</strong> chemical<br />
description, 190–193<br />
chemical composition <strong>and</strong> congeneric groups,<br />
188–190<br />
flavor functions, processing for, 188<br />
plant sources, 187–188<br />
Food Improvement Agents Package, 928<br />
Food machinery corporation-in-Line, 98<br />
Foodstuffs <strong>and</strong> beverages<br />
substances in, 927<br />
Forest red gum, 249<br />
Formalin, 243<br />
Formalin test, 240<br />
4β-Hydroxy-eudesmane-1,6-dione (146), 766<br />
by Aspergillus niger, 759<br />
Fourier transform infrared spectrometer, 23<br />
Fragrance <strong>and</strong> flavor industry<br />
development <strong>of</strong>, 844<br />
Fragrance industry, 923<br />
Fragrances, 568, 844–845<br />
adverse reactions to, 566<br />
dosage, in consumer products<br />
<strong>and</strong> essential oil contents, 851<br />
industrial manufactures <strong>of</strong>, 845<br />
Fragrances <strong>and</strong> EOs influence, on brain potentials<br />
indicative <strong>of</strong> arousal, 285<br />
contingent negative variation, 289–290<br />
spontaneous electroencephalogram activity, 285–289<br />
Frankincense, 554<br />
Franz diffusion cells, 254<br />
FRAP. See Ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP)<br />
Free Radical Scavenging Assay, 257<br />
Free radicals, 256<br />
French Pharmacopoeia X, 353<br />
Fruit oils, 91<br />
Frullania dilatata, 792<br />
Frullania tamarisci, 776, 792<br />
Frullanolide (226), 778<br />
Fusarium culmorum, 804<br />
Fusarium equiseti, 783<br />
Fusarium lini, 803, 811<br />
Fusobacterium nucleatum, 320, 321<br />
Future Flavouring Regulation<br />
“Biologically Active Substances”, Levels <strong>of</strong>, 929–933<br />
“Natural”, Definition <strong>of</strong>, 933–935<br />
G<br />
GABA. See γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA)<br />
Galbanum, 554<br />
Galangal oil, 254<br />
γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), 302<br />
type A antagonist, 243<br />
γ-cyclocostunolide (171), 773<br />
γ-eudesmol (157a), 768<br />
(+)-γ-gurjunene (228), 778<br />
γ-interferon, <strong>and</strong> IL-4, 249
960 Index<br />
γ-methylionone, 922<br />
γ-selinene, 272<br />
γ-terpinene, 253, 262, 264, 265, 616<br />
Gamble, James, 845<br />
Ganoderma applanatum, 587, 720<br />
Garlic oil, 885<br />
Gas chromatographic enantiomer characterization,<br />
164–165<br />
Gas chromatography (GC), 12, 157–158<br />
fast <strong>and</strong> ultrafast GC, 13<br />
chiral GC, 13–15<br />
comprehensive multidimensional GC, 18<br />
two-dimensional GC, 15–18<br />
Gas chromatography-atomic emission spectroscopy<br />
(GC-AES), 24<br />
Gas chromatography-combustion IRMS device<br />
(GC-C-IRMS), 24<br />
Gas chromatography-Fourier transform infrared<br />
(GC-FTIR), 13, 24<br />
Gas chromatography-isotope ratio mass spectrometry<br />
(GC-IRMS), 24<br />
Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), 6,<br />
21–23, 158–159, 238, 261, 262, 921<br />
Gas chromatography-olfactometry systems, 162–164<br />
Gas chromatography-pyrolysis-IRMS (GC-P-IRMS), 24<br />
Gas chromatography-ultraviolet spectroscopy (GC-UV),<br />
23, 24<br />
Gaultheria procumbens, 331<br />
Gaultheria procumbens, 886, 887<br />
GC. See Gas chromatography (GC)<br />
GC × GC. See Comprehensive two-dimensional gas<br />
chromatography (GC × GC)<br />
GC-AES. See Gas chromatography-atomic emission<br />
spectroscopy (GC-AES)<br />
GC-C-IRMS. See Gas chromatography-combustion<br />
IRMS device (GC-C-IRMS)<br />
GC-FTIR. See Gas chromatography-Fourier transform<br />
infrared (GC-FTIR)<br />
GC-IRMS. See Gas chromatography-isotope ratio mass<br />
spectrometry (GC-IRMS)<br />
GC-MS. See Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry<br />
(GC-MS)<br />
GC-P-IRMS. See Gas chromatography-pyrolysis-IRMS<br />
(GC-P-IRMS)<br />
GC-UV. See Gas chromatography-ultraviolet<br />
spectroscopy (GC-UV)<br />
Generally regarded as safe, 883<br />
Genetic engineering, 53–54<br />
Genetic variation <strong>and</strong> plant breeding, 61–63<br />
artificially generated new variability, 63<br />
extended variability, 61–63<br />
natural variability exploitation, 61<br />
Geraniaceae, 249<br />
Geranial, 271<br />
Geranic acid, 588<br />
Geraniol, 133, 218, 219, 236, 237, 249, 304, 306,<br />
588, 714<br />
Geranium oil, 848, 883, 884<br />
Geranium species, 551<br />
Geranyl acetate, 249, 884<br />
cis-Geranyl acetone (463) biotransformation<br />
by Glomerella cingulata, 816<br />
trans-Geranyl acetone (470)<br />
by Glomerella cingulata, 817<br />
Germacrene B, 250<br />
Germacrene D, 250, 261, 268<br />
Germacrone, 239<br />
Germacrone (118) biotransformation, 761, 763<br />
by Aspergillus niger, 762<br />
by Curcuma aromatica, 762<br />
by Curcuma zedoaria, 762<br />
by Solidago altissima cells, 764<br />
Giardia duodenalis, 885<br />
Giardia, 885<br />
Gibberella fujikuroii, 802, 808<br />
Gibberella suabinetii, 765, 768<br />
Gil-Av, 14<br />
Ginger, 848<br />
Ginger Ale, 845<br />
6-Gingerol (613), 834<br />
Ginsenol (435), 813<br />
biotransformation by Botrytis cinerea, 811<br />
Glibenclamide, 243<br />
Gliocladium roseum, 764, 766<br />
Global dem<strong>and</strong>, for essential oil, 115<br />
Globally Harmonized System <strong>of</strong> Classification<br />
<strong>and</strong> Labeling <strong>of</strong> Chemicals, 936<br />
Globulol (58) biotransformation, 755<br />
by Bacillus megaterium, 754<br />
by Mycobacterium smegmatis, 754<br />
Globulol, 250<br />
Glomerella cingulata, 594, 612, 754, 755, 763–764, 766,<br />
777, 779, 787, 804, 805, 806, 811, 816, 817, 821<br />
10-epi-Glubulol (70) biotransformation<br />
by Aspergillus niger, 756<br />
by Cephalosporium aphidicola, 756<br />
by Glomerella cingulata, 756<br />
Glutathione, 256<br />
Glutathione peroxidase, 256<br />
Glutathione S-transferase, 237<br />
Glycine soya, 561<br />
Gomasio (A Sesame Sea-Salt Spice), 868–869<br />
Gram-negative bacteria, 886<br />
Gram-positive bacteria, 886<br />
Grapefruit leaf oil, 65<br />
Grapefruit, 848<br />
Grapeseed, 561<br />
Grapeseed oil, 891<br />
Grasse, 844<br />
Grossulariaceae, 272<br />
Group I, 922<br />
Grumichama, 250<br />
Guadeloupe, 239<br />
Guaianolide (252a), 782<br />
Guaiazulene, 138<br />
Guaicwood oil, 138<br />
Guaiene (235), 779<br />
Guaiol (221), 779<br />
Guaiol (231), 779<br />
Guava, 250<br />
Guayava, 265<br />
Gum turpentine, oil <strong>of</strong>, 86<br />
Gynaecological papyrus, 555<br />
H<br />
Haemoglobin, 256<br />
Hairy fingerleaf, 249
Index 961<br />
Halogenated hydrocarbons <strong>and</strong> heavy metals,<br />
determination <strong>of</strong>, 154<br />
Hansenula anomala, 824, 825<br />
Harvest, timing <strong>of</strong>, 91–92<br />
Harvesting, 71<br />
Hassk, 272<br />
Hazard classification <strong>and</strong> labeling, <strong>of</strong> flavors <strong>and</strong><br />
fragrance, 935–939<br />
Hazard Communication Working Group, 910<br />
Headspace sorptive extraction, 10–11<br />
Headspace techniques, 8, 88<br />
dynamic method, 8–10<br />
static method, 8<br />
Heart-cutting technique, 15<br />
Hedeoma pulegoides, 225<br />
Hedychium, 272<br />
Hela, 237, 239<br />
Helianthus annuus, 561<br />
Helichrysum dasyanthum, 249, 261<br />
Helichrysum excisum, 249, 261<br />
Helichrysum felinum, 249<br />
Helichrysum italicum, 320<br />
Helichrysum petiolare, 249, 261<br />
Helicobacter pylori, 253, 254, 326<br />
Heliotropin, 844<br />
Hell<strong>and</strong>rene, 720<br />
Hemagglutination valence-reduction test, 245<br />
hemiterpenoids, 130, 131<br />
Hep G2, 237, 239<br />
Hep-2 (human laryngeal cancer cell line), 237<br />
Hepatic lipid peroxides, 237<br />
Herb oil, 65<br />
(-)-Herbertenediol (339), 796<br />
Herbertus adancus, 793<br />
Herbertus sakuraii, 793<br />
Herbromix Study, 888–889<br />
in vivo experiments, 888–889<br />
Herpes simplex virus, 244<br />
Heterothalamus alienus, 246<br />
Heterotheca latifolia, 245<br />
Hexamita infl ata, 885<br />
High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), 19,<br />
254<br />
separation <strong>of</strong> essential oils, 19<br />
High-performance liquid chromatography-gas<br />
chromatography (HPLC-GC), 24–26<br />
High-pressure valve injector, 26<br />
High-resolution gas chromatography (HRGC), 6<br />
High-resolution gas chromatography-Fourier transform<br />
infrared spectroscopy, 23<br />
High-speed centrifugal countercurrent chromatography,<br />
21<br />
Hinesol (384), 801<br />
Hinokitiol, 306<br />
Hinokitiol (589), 831<br />
Hirzel, Heinrich Dr, 849<br />
Historical origins, <strong>of</strong> essential oil production, 86<br />
History <strong>and</strong> sources, <strong>of</strong> essential oil research, 3<br />
chromatographic separation techniques, 11<br />
countercurrent chromatography, 20–21<br />
gas chromatography, 12–18<br />
liquid column chromatography, 18–19<br />
supercritical fluid chromatography, 20<br />
thin-layer chromatography, 12<br />
first systematic investigations, 3–5<br />
hyphenated techniques, 21<br />
gas chromatography-atomic emission<br />
spectroscopy, 24<br />
gas chromatography-isotope ratio mass<br />
spectrometry, 24<br />
gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, 21–23<br />
gas chromatography-ultraviolet spectroscopy, 23<br />
high-performance liquid chromatography-gas<br />
chromatography, 24–26<br />
high-resolution gas chromatography-Fourier<br />
transform infrared spectroscopy, 23<br />
HPLC-MS, HPLC-NMR spectroscopy, 26<br />
SFC-MS AND SFC-FTIR spectroscopy, couplings<br />
<strong>of</strong>, 27<br />
supercritical fluid chromatography-gas<br />
chromatography, 26–27<br />
supercritical fluid extraction-gas chromatography,<br />
26<br />
multicomponent samples, identification <strong>of</strong>, 27<br />
13<br />
C-NMR spectroscopy, 28–30<br />
IR apectroscopy, 28<br />
mass spectrometry, 28<br />
UV Spectroscopy, 27–28<br />
preparation techniques, 5<br />
industrial processes, 5<br />
laboratory-scale techniques, 5–6<br />
microsampling techniques, 6–11<br />
HL-60 (human promyelocytic leukemia cell line), 237,<br />
238<br />
Holmskiodiopsis, 249<br />
Homemade Fresh Berry Jelly, 879<br />
Honey Provencal, 869<br />
Hops oregano, 266<br />
Hot-plate test, 240, 242<br />
Hot steam, 88–89<br />
HPLC. See High performance liquid chromatography<br />
(HPLC)<br />
HPLC-GC. See High-performance liquid<br />
chromatography-gas chromatography<br />
(HPLC-GC)<br />
HRGC. See High-resolution gas chromatography (HRGC)<br />
Human colon adenocarcinoma cell line. See DLD-1<br />
(human colon adenocarcinoma cell line)<br />
Human lung carcinoma cell line. See A-549 (human lung<br />
carcinoma cell line)<br />
Human melanoma cell line. See M14 WT (human<br />
melanoma cell line)<br />
Human promyelocytic leukemia cell line. See HL-60<br />
(human promyelocytic leukemia cell line)<br />
Humidity, 89<br />
Hybrid breeding, 62<br />
Hydrocarbons, 904<br />
8-Hydrocarvomenthone, 717<br />
Hydrodistillation, 100, 103, 116<br />
Hydroperoxy-octadeca-dienoic acid isomers, 258<br />
Hydrophilic polymers, 858<br />
Hydroquinone, 256<br />
Hydrosols, 883<br />
8α-Hydroxybicyclogermacrene (108) biotransformation<br />
by Calonectria decora, 761<br />
by Mucor circinelloides, 761<br />
6-Hydroxy-1,2-campholide, 719<br />
2-Hydroxy-1,4-cineole, 720
962 Index<br />
9-Hydroxy-1,4-cineole, 720<br />
2-Hydroxy-1,8-cineole, 720<br />
9-Hydroxy-1,8-cineole, 720<br />
6-Hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic<br />
acid, 257<br />
1-Hydroxy-3,7-dimethyl-(2E,6E)-octadienal, 596<br />
1-Hydroxy-3,7-dimethyl-(2E,6E)-octadienoic acid, 596<br />
1-Hydroxy-3,7-dimethyl-6-octen-2-one, 590<br />
1-Hydroxy-8-p-menthene-2-one (72), 717<br />
3-Hydroxy isopiperitenone, 718<br />
o-Hydroxybenzoic acid, 127<br />
3-Hydroxy-camphene, 719<br />
5-Hydroxy-camphene, 719<br />
6-Hydroxy-camphene, 719<br />
5-Hydroxycamphor, 719<br />
9-Hydroxycamphor, 719<br />
5-Hydroxycarveol, 717<br />
8-Hydroxycarvomenthol, 717<br />
5-Hydroxycarvone, 717<br />
8-Hydroxycarvotanacetone, 717, 720<br />
2-Hydroxycineole, 720<br />
3-Hydroxycineole, 720<br />
8-Hydroxycineole, 720<br />
Hydroxycitronellal, 922, 924<br />
5-Hydroxydihydrocarveol, 718<br />
10-Hydroxydihydrocarveol, 718<br />
1-Hydroxydihydrocarvone, 718<br />
5-Hydroxydihydrocarvone, 717<br />
10-Hydroxydihydrocarvone, 718<br />
7-Hydroxyethyl-α-terpineol, 720<br />
6-Hydroxyfenchol, 709<br />
7-Hydroxyfenchol, 709<br />
9-Hydroxyfenchol, 709<br />
4-Hydroxyisopiperitenone, 718<br />
7-Hydroxyisopiperitenone, 718<br />
Hydroxyl radical scavenging, 261<br />
8-Hydroxymenthenone, 718<br />
6-Hydroxymenthol, 717<br />
3-Hydroxymyrtanol, 717<br />
4-Hydroxymyrtanol, 717<br />
10-Hydroxynerol, 596<br />
8-Hydroxynerol, 596<br />
7-Hydroxypiperitenone, 718<br />
5-Hydroxypiperitone, 718<br />
8-Hydroxypiperitone, 718<br />
7-Hydroxy-p-menthane, 720<br />
7-Hydroxyterpinene-4-ol, 720<br />
1-Hydroxythujone, 717<br />
p-Hydroxytoluene, 720<br />
7-Hydroxyverbenone, 717<br />
Hymenolepis nana, 885<br />
Hyphenated techniques, 21<br />
GC-atomic emission spectroscopy, 24<br />
GC-isotope ratio mass spectrometry, 24<br />
GC-mass spectrometry, 21–23<br />
GC-ultraviolet spectroscopy, 23<br />
high-resolution GC-Fourier transform infrared<br />
spectroscopy, 23<br />
HPLC-GC, 24–26<br />
HPLC-MS, HPLC-NMR spectroscopy, 26<br />
SFC-MS AND SFC-FTIR spectroscopy, couplings <strong>of</strong>,<br />
27<br />
SFE-gas chromatography, 26–27<br />
supercritical fluid extraction-gas chromatography, 26<br />
Hyptis verticillata, 756, 785<br />
Hyssop, 884<br />
Hyssopus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis, 884<br />
I<br />
IFRA. See International Fragrance Research Association<br />
(IFRA)<br />
Illegal marketing, in EU<br />
Not Registered with EINECS <strong>and</strong> ELINCS<br />
Nor Compliance with Reach Regulations,<br />
905–907<br />
Illex paraguariensis, 270<br />
Indole, 128<br />
Indomethacin, 250<br />
Industrial uses, <strong>of</strong> essential oils, 843<br />
changing trends, 849–853<br />
flavors, 845–846<br />
fragrances, 844–845<br />
history, 844<br />
production <strong>and</strong> consumptions, 846–849<br />
Inducible nitric oxide synthetase (inos), 242<br />
Industrial manufactures<br />
<strong>of</strong> essential oils, flavors, <strong>and</strong> fragrances, 845<br />
Industrial processes, in essential oil preparation, 5<br />
Information Network <strong>of</strong> Departments <strong>of</strong><br />
Dermatology, 922<br />
Inhalation influence, <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> Eos, 291<br />
Inhibiory effect, 245<br />
Insect stress <strong>and</strong> microorganisms, 90<br />
Insecticidal, Pest Repellent, <strong>and</strong> Antiparasitic <strong>Oils</strong>, 884<br />
Insects biotransformation, sesquiterpenoids, 819<br />
Interleukin, 246<br />
International Federation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong> <strong>and</strong> Aroma<br />
Trades, 899<br />
International Fragrance Association Code <strong>of</strong><br />
Practice, 920<br />
International Fragrance Research Association<br />
(IFRA), 567<br />
international st<strong>and</strong>ard on sustainable wild collection <strong>of</strong><br />
medicinal <strong>and</strong> aromatic plants (ISSC-MAP),<br />
59, 72–73<br />
International St<strong>and</strong>ard Organization (ISO), 910<br />
In vitro antimicrobial activities, <strong>of</strong> essential oils,<br />
353–354, 537–540<br />
agar diffusion test (ADT), 354<br />
anise oil, 356–359<br />
bitter fennel, 365–369<br />
caraway oil, 372–376<br />
cassia oil, 380<br />
Ceylon cinnamon bark oil, 383–386<br />
Ceylon cinnamon leaf oil, 390<br />
citronella oil, 393–396<br />
clary sage oil, 400<br />
clove leaf oil, 404–408<br />
cori<strong>and</strong>er oil, 414–418<br />
dwarf pine oil, 421<br />
eucalyptus oil, 423–425<br />
juniper oil, 429–430<br />
lavender oil, 434–436<br />
lemon oil, 442–446<br />
m<strong>and</strong>arin oil, 451–453<br />
matricaria oil, 455–457<br />
mint oil, 461–463
Index 963<br />
neroli oil, 465–466<br />
peppermint oil, 474–477<br />
Pinus sylvestris oil, 482–483<br />
rosemary oil, 487–492<br />
star anise oil, 500–501<br />
sweet orange oil, 503–507<br />
tea tree oil, 512<br />
thyme oils, 521–524<br />
dilution test (DIL), 354–355<br />
anise oil, 360–363<br />
bitter fennel, 370<br />
caraway oil, 377–378<br />
cassia oil, 381<br />
Ceylon cinnamon bark oil, 387–388<br />
Ceylon cinnamon leaf oil, 391<br />
citronella oil, 397–398<br />
clary sage oil, 401–402<br />
clove leaf oil, 409–412<br />
cori<strong>and</strong>er oil, 419–420<br />
dwarf pine oil, 421<br />
eucalyptus oil, 426–427<br />
juniper oil, 431–432<br />
lavender oil, 437–439<br />
lemon oil, 447–449<br />
m<strong>and</strong>arin oil, 454<br />
matricaria oil, 458–459<br />
neroli oil, 467<br />
nutmeg oil, 469–471<br />
nutmeg oil, 472–473<br />
peppermint oil, 478–480<br />
Pinus sylvestris oil, 484–485<br />
rosemary oil, 493–497<br />
star anise oil, 502<br />
sweet orange oil, 508–510<br />
tea tree oil, 513–519<br />
thyme oils, 525–531<br />
vapor phase test (VPT), 355<br />
anise oil, 364<br />
bitter fennel, 371<br />
caraway oil, 379<br />
cassia oil, 382<br />
Ceylon cinnamon bark oil, 389<br />
Ceylon cinnamon leaf oil, 392<br />
citronella oil, 399<br />
clary sage oil, 403<br />
clove leaf oil, 413<br />
cori<strong>and</strong>er oil, 420<br />
dwarf pine oil, 422<br />
eucalyptus oil, 428<br />
juniper oil, 433<br />
lavender oil, 440–441<br />
lemon oil, 450<br />
m<strong>and</strong>arin oil, 454<br />
matricaria oil, 460<br />
mint oil, 464<br />
neroli oil, 468<br />
nutmeg oil, 473<br />
peppermint oil, 481<br />
Pinus sylvestris oil, 486<br />
rosemary oil, 498–499<br />
star anise oil, 502<br />
sweet orange oil, 511<br />
tea tree oil, 520<br />
thyme oils, 532–533<br />
p-Iodonitrophenyltetrazolium violet, 354<br />
IOFI, 910<br />
Ionones, biotransformation <strong>of</strong>, 823–828<br />
IR spectroscopy, 28<br />
ISO. See International St<strong>and</strong>ard Organization (ISO)<br />
Isoeugenol, 129, 305, 563, 696, 922, 924<br />
Isolimonene, 614<br />
(+)-Isolongifolene-9-one (442), 806<br />
biotransformation by Glomerella cingulata, 811<br />
(-)-Isolongifolol (445a), 818<br />
(+)-Isomenthol, 627<br />
ISO-Norm 9235 Aromatic Natural Raw Materials, 904<br />
Isopinocampheol (3-Pinanol), 693<br />
Isopiperitenol, 643, 717, 718<br />
Isopiperitenone, 711, 717, 718<br />
Isoprobotryan-9 α-ol (458), 813<br />
biotransformation by Botrytis cinerea, 816<br />
Isopulegol, 305, 627<br />
Isovalerianic acids, 883<br />
ISSC-MAP. See International st<strong>and</strong>ard on sustainable<br />
wild collection <strong>of</strong> medicinal <strong>and</strong> aromatic<br />
plants (ISSC-MAP)<br />
J<br />
J774 (mouse monocytic cell line), 237, 247<br />
J774.A1, 242<br />
Jamzad, 252<br />
Jasmine, 563<br />
biosynthesis <strong>of</strong>, 125<br />
Jasmine fragrance, 288, 290, 292, 294<br />
trans-Jasminlactone, 304<br />
Jasminum sambac, 40<br />
Jatamansi oil, 569<br />
Java, 884<br />
Java citronella, 70<br />
Java grass, 300<br />
Johnson, B.J., 844<br />
Jojoba, 561<br />
Juicy Fruit gum, 846<br />
Jungermannia rosulans, 792<br />
Junin virus (JUNV), 244, 245, 246<br />
Juniper oil, 117, 353<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 429–430<br />
obtained in dilution test, 431–432<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 433<br />
Juniperus communis, 884<br />
Juniperus procera, 264<br />
Juniperus rigida, 885<br />
Juniperus virginiana, 884<br />
JUNV. See Junin virus (JUNV)<br />
Jura Chalk <strong>of</strong> the Haute Provence, 90<br />
K<br />
K562 (human erythroleucemic cell line), 237<br />
Kaneh, 250<br />
Kekule terpenes, 4<br />
Keshary–Chien diffusion cells, 254, 255<br />
Ketodiol, 590<br />
Ketones, 904<br />
Klonemax ® , 324<br />
Kluyveromyces marxianus, 787, 789
964 Index<br />
KNOWN, 905<br />
Kölnisch Wasser, 843<br />
Kunyit, 248<br />
L<br />
L1210 leukemia cell, 239<br />
Labdanum, 554<br />
Labeling, 910–912<br />
Laboratory-scale techniques, 5–6<br />
Lactarius camphorates, 820<br />
Lactarius graveolens, 46<br />
Lactone, 720<br />
Lambli intestinalis, 885<br />
Lamiaceae (Labiatae), 40, 42–46, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241,<br />
243, 245, 252, 258, 259, 264, 265, 267, 268,<br />
269, 272, 906<br />
Lancerodiol p-hydroxybenzoate (446) biotransformation<br />
by Marchantia polymorpha cells, 812<br />
Lara’s Jamu, 870<br />
Larvae <strong>of</strong> Cécidomye, 90<br />
Lauraceae, 239, 241, 246, 249, 250, 270<br />
Laurel leaf, 888<br />
Lauric acid, 256<br />
Laurus nobilis, 241, 246, 249, 270, 271, 320, 888<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>in oil, 101, 906<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>in oil grosso, 906<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia, 323, 556, 575, 884, 885, 887<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia angustifolia, 906<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>ula angustifolia ext., 906<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>ula hybrida, 241<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>ula hybrida ext., 906<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>ula hybrida grosso ext., 906<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>ula <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis, 320, 330<br />
Lav<strong>and</strong>ulae aetheroleum, 887<br />
Lavender, 90, 93, 94, 883, 884, 906<br />
Lavender fragrance, 288, 290, 292, 294<br />
Lavender oil, 300, 302, 535, 883, 906<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 434–436<br />
obtained in dilution test, 437–439<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 440–441<br />
LC. See Liquid chromatography (LC)<br />
LC × LC. See Comprehensive liquid chromatography<br />
(LC × LC)<br />
Ldengue virus type 2, 244<br />
Learning <strong>and</strong> memory, fragrances <strong>and</strong> EOs on, 293–295<br />
Least basil, 270<br />
Ledol (75) biotransformation, 756<br />
by Aspergillus niger, 756<br />
by Cephalosporium aphidicola, 756<br />
by Glomerella cingulata, 756<br />
Ledum groel<strong>and</strong>icum, 320<br />
Le Livre de Parfumeur, 849<br />
Lemna minior L., 803<br />
Lemon, 848<br />
Lemon balm, Lamiaceae, 271<br />
Lemon bee balm, 268<br />
Lemon eucalyptus, 249<br />
Lemongrass, 240, 848<br />
Lemongrass oil, 884, 885<br />
Lemon–lime drink 7UP, 846<br />
Lemon oil, 28, 302, 535, 883<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 442–446<br />
obtained in dilution test, 447–449<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 450<br />
Lemon petitgrain, 848<br />
Leptospermum scoparium, 246, 320<br />
Lever, William Hesket, 845<br />
Lichen resinoids, 569<br />
Licorice plant, 249<br />
Ligularia fi scheri var. Spiciformis, 248<br />
Ligularia, 248<br />
Ligurian yarrow, 261<br />
Lilac, 255<br />
Lime oil, conventional <strong>and</strong> fast-GC separation <strong>of</strong>, 14<br />
Limonene, 218–219, 220, 238, 247, 248, 259, 264, 270,<br />
304, 568–569, 595, 603, 711, 717, 720, 885, 922<br />
d-Limonene, 236, 254, 924, 925<br />
S-(–)-Limonene, 306<br />
Limonene epoxide, 717<br />
Limonene-1,2-diol, 717<br />
Limonene-1,2-epoxide, 717<br />
Linalool, 68, 133, 219, 221, 236, 242, 249, 269, 270, 271,<br />
272, 293, 298, 301, 303, 569, 594, 596, 709,<br />
713, 717, 922, 925<br />
(−)-Linalool, 242, 243<br />
(R)-(–)-Linalool, 304<br />
(S)-(+)-Linalool, 304<br />
Linalool <strong>and</strong> linalyl acetate, 248<br />
Linalyl acetate, 221, 306, 596<br />
Linear retention indices in essential oils analysis, 157–158<br />
Linfluenza virus A3, 244<br />
Linoleic acid assay, 258–272<br />
Linoleic acid model system, 271<br />
Lipid peroxidation inhibition, 261<br />
Lipopolysaccharide, 242<br />
5-Lipoxygenase, 251<br />
Lippia alba, 46, 47, 298<br />
Lippia graveolens, 47<br />
Lippia javanica, 891<br />
Lippia junelliana, 245<br />
Lippia multifl ora, 317, 321<br />
Lippia origanoides, 318<br />
Lippia sidoides, 253, 322<br />
Lippia sp., 67<br />
Lippia turbinate, 245<br />
Liquid chromatography (LC), 18, 165–167<br />
high-performance liquid column chromatography, 19<br />
preseparation, <strong>of</strong> essential oils, 18–19<br />
Liquid wax jojoba oil, 255<br />
Liquidambar orientalis, 554<br />
Lisbon lemon, 263<br />
Litsea cubeba oil, 899<br />
Live-T-connection, 17<br />
Ljunin virus, 244<br />
Local lymph node assay, 925<br />
Location, <strong>of</strong> essential oil cells, 91<br />
Locus ceruleus, noradrenergic projections<br />
from, 284<br />
Longifolene, 229, 231<br />
Longifolene (489), 820<br />
Longitudinal modulated cryogenic system, 172<br />
L’Oreal, 845<br />
Lycopine, 256<br />
Lynderia strychnifolia, 239<br />
Lysogenic cavities, 40
Index 965<br />
M<br />
M14 WT (human melanoma cell line), 237<br />
M4BEU, 237<br />
Macadamia integrifolia, 561<br />
Macadamia nut, 561<br />
Maceration, 555<br />
Macrophomina phaseolina, 808<br />
Main course recipes<br />
Celery Lemon Grass Patties, 875<br />
Chévre Chaude-Goat Cheese “Provence”, with<br />
Pineapple, 875–876<br />
Crispy Wild Rice-Chapatis, 876<br />
Mango–Dates–Orange Chutney, 876–877<br />
Prawns Bergamot, 877–878<br />
Majorana hortensis, 8<br />
Malonyl ester, 720<br />
Mammals, sesquiterpenoids by<br />
animals (rabbits) <strong>and</strong> dosing, 819–820<br />
sesquiterpenoids, 820–823<br />
M<strong>and</strong>arin oil, 535, 848<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 451–453<br />
obtained in dilution test, 454<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 454<br />
Mango–Dates–Orange Chutney, 876–877<br />
Manuka oil, 246<br />
Marasmius oreades, 789<br />
Marchantia polymorpha, 747, 774, 776, 792, 806, 812<br />
Marcusson device, 6<br />
Maria’s Dip, 873<br />
Marigolds, 884<br />
Marjoram, 69<br />
Market information, 898<br />
Marketing, <strong>of</strong> essential oils, 905<br />
Mass spectrometry, 28<br />
Massage<br />
pain relief, 564<br />
techniques, 559<br />
Mastic thyme, 259<br />
Mastic tree resin, 846<br />
Mastigophora diclados, 793<br />
Mate, 270<br />
Material Safety Data Sheet, 899, 909<br />
Matricaria oil, 535<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 455–457<br />
obtained in dilution test, 458–459<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 460<br />
Matricaria recutita, 50, 67, 891<br />
Maximal electroshock, 300<br />
MCF-7, 237<br />
MCF7 adrr, 239<br />
MCF7 WT, 239<br />
MDGC. See Multidimensional gas chromatography<br />
(MDGC)<br />
MDGC-C/P-IRMS device, 25<br />
MDLC. See Multidimensional liquid chromatographic<br />
techniques (MDLC)<br />
Medicines <strong>and</strong> Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency,<br />
569<br />
Megabac®, 323<br />
Megaleion, 555<br />
Melaleuca, 244, 262<br />
Melaleuca alternifolia, 238, 247, 262, 317, 318, 320, 322,<br />
323, 884<br />
Melaleuca armillaris, 244, 262<br />
Melaleuca cajeputi, 885<br />
Melaleuca ericifolia, 244, 569<br />
Melaleuca leucadendron, 244, 331<br />
Melaleuca quinquenervia, 320<br />
Melaleuca rosalina, 569<br />
Melaleuca styphelioides, 244<br />
Melaleuca oil <strong>of</strong>, 86<br />
Meleguetta pepper, 262<br />
Melissa, 254<br />
Melissa <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis, 92<br />
Melissa <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis L., 237, 245, 271<br />
Melissa oil, 570–571, 891<br />
melting <strong>and</strong> congealing points, estimation <strong>of</strong>, 154<br />
Memory <strong>and</strong> learning, fragrances <strong>and</strong> EOs on, 293–295<br />
p-Mentane-1,2,4-triol, 720<br />
p-Mentha-1,8-diene-4-ol, 717<br />
p-Mentha-2,8-diene-1-ol, 717<br />
Mentha aquatica, 8, 258<br />
Mentha arvensis, 318, 848<br />
p-Menthane, 614, 713<br />
p-Menthane-1,2,8-triol, 717<br />
p-Menthane-1,2-diol, 709<br />
p-Menthane-2,8,9-triol, 718<br />
p-Menthane-2,8-diol, 717, 718<br />
p-Menthane-2,9-diol, 717<br />
Mentha piperita, 8, 189, 245, 258, 318, 322, 883, 884, 885<br />
Mentha pulegium, 225<br />
Mentha spicata, 318<br />
Mentha X piperita, 329<br />
trans-p-2,8-Menthadien-1-ol, 251<br />
Cis-p-2,8-Menthadien-1-ol, 251<br />
trans-p-1(7),8-Menthadien-2-ol, 251<br />
Cis-p-11:(7),8-Menthadien-2-ol, 251<br />
1-p-Menthen-2-ol, 709, 717<br />
1-p-Menthene, 614<br />
3-p-Menthene, 615<br />
1-p-Menthene, 709<br />
8-p-Menthene-1,2-diol, 718<br />
1-p-Menthene-6,9-diol, 717<br />
1-p-Menthene-8,9-diol, 717<br />
1-p-Menthene-8-cation, 709<br />
1-p-Menthene-9-oic acid, 717<br />
Menthol, 221–222, 236, 333–334, 590, 621, 712, 884, 891<br />
l-Menthol, 148–149<br />
Menthone, 712<br />
Menu<br />
appetizers <strong>and</strong> finger food, 868<br />
basics, 867<br />
beverages, 867<br />
dessert, cakes <strong>and</strong> baked goods, 868<br />
entrees, 868<br />
main course, 868<br />
Meridol®, 321<br />
Mesopotamian art <strong>of</strong> distillation, 87<br />
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 318<br />
Methotrexate, 237<br />
(-)-Methoxy-α-herbertene (343), 796, 797<br />
2,5-di-O-Methylacetophenone, 250<br />
3-Methyl-2-butenoic acid, 590<br />
2-(4-Methyl-3-cyclohexenylidene)-propionic acid, 717<br />
2,6-Methyl-3-pentyl-b-cyclodextrin, 16
966 Index<br />
2,6-Methyl-3-pentyl-β-cyclodextrin, 15<br />
6-Methyl-5-heptenoic acid, 590<br />
2-Methyl-6-methylene-7-octen-2-ol, 720<br />
Methyl 3-methylorsellinate, 123<br />
Methyl anthranilate, synthesis <strong>of</strong>, 145<br />
Methylchavicol, 304<br />
20-Methylcholanthrene, 237<br />
N-Methyl-d-aspartic acid receptors, 242<br />
Methyldihydro eugenol (563), 829<br />
Methyl eugenol, 243, 244, 305, 885, 930, 931<br />
Methylheptin carbonate, 922<br />
Methyl jasmonate, 304<br />
Methyl nonyl ketone, 884<br />
2-Methylpropanal, 272<br />
Methyl salicylate, 883, 884, 886<br />
Mexican oregano, 46<br />
MIC. See Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)<br />
Michelia champaca, 777<br />
Microdistillation, 6–7<br />
Microhydrodistillation device, 8<br />
Microorganisms, sesquiterpenoids by, 738–754<br />
Microorganisms <strong>and</strong> insect stress, 90<br />
Microsampling techniques, 6<br />
direct sampling, from secretory structures, 7–8<br />
headspace techniques, 8<br />
dynamic method, 8–10<br />
static method, 8<br />
microdistillation, 6–7<br />
solid-phase microextraction, 10<br />
stir bar sorptive extraction <strong>and</strong> headspace sorptive<br />
extraction, 10–11<br />
Microsporum canis, 319<br />
Microsporum gypseum, 319<br />
Microsporum nanum, 319<br />
Microwave-assisted hydrodistillation methods, 112<br />
Migraine headaches, 566<br />
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), 355<br />
Minthostachys verticillata, 245<br />
Mint oil, 535<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 461–463<br />
obtained in dilution test, 464<br />
Mintoil®, 327<br />
Mint plant, 272<br />
Mitomycin C, 238<br />
Modern analytical techniques, 156–157<br />
fast GC for essential oil analysis, 159–162<br />
gas chromatographic enantiomer characterization,<br />
164–165<br />
gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, 158–159<br />
gas chromatography-olfactometry for odor-active<br />
components assessment, 162–164<br />
GC <strong>and</strong> linear retention indices, use <strong>of</strong>, 157–158<br />
LC <strong>and</strong> liquid chromatography hyphenated to MS,<br />
165–167<br />
multidimensional gas chromatographic techniques,<br />
167–174<br />
multidimensional liquid chromatographic techniques,<br />
174–176<br />
on-line coupled liquid chromatography-gas<br />
chromatography (LC-GC), 176–177<br />
Modern perfumery, 557<br />
Molecular markers, 53<br />
Monarda citriodora, 268<br />
Monarda didyma L., 268<br />
Monarda fi stulosa, 133<br />
Monocyclic monoterpene alcohol, 621<br />
Monocyclic monoterpene aldehyde, 619<br />
Monocyclic monoterpene hydrocarbon, 603<br />
Monocyclic monoterpene ketone, 648<br />
Monomers α-l-glucuronic acid (G), 859<br />
Monoterpene alcohol linalool, 265<br />
Monoterpene aldehydes, 134<br />
Monoterpene ester, 248<br />
Monoterpenes metabolism<br />
α-<strong>and</strong> β-thujone, 225–226, 228<br />
α-terpineol, 225, 226<br />
camphene, 210<br />
camphor, 210–212<br />
carvacrol, 212<br />
carvone, 213<br />
1,4-cineole, 213–214<br />
1,8-cineole, 214–216<br />
citral, 216–217<br />
citronellal, 217<br />
fenchone, 217–218<br />
geraniol, 218<br />
limonene, 218–219, 220<br />
linalool, 219, 221<br />
linalyl acetate, 221<br />
menthol, 221–222<br />
myrcene, 223<br />
pinene, 223–225<br />
pulegone, 225<br />
thymol, 226<br />
Monoterpenes, 41, 236<br />
Monoterpenic phenol, 238<br />
Monoterpenoid alcohols, 133<br />
Monoterpenoid ketones, 134–135<br />
Monoterpenoids, 130, 131–135<br />
Monoterpenoids, biotransformation <strong>of</strong>, 585<br />
insects, 585, 716<br />
mammals, 585, 712, 716<br />
metabolic pathways<br />
acyclic monoterpenoids, 587<br />
bicyclic monoterpenoids, 677<br />
cyclic monoterpenoids, 603<br />
microbial transformation<br />
by unit reactions, 720–726<br />
microorganisms<br />
alcohols <strong>and</strong> aldehydes, 588–590<br />
hydrocarbons, 587–588<br />
metabolic pathways, 709–720<br />
Monterey Pine, 265<br />
Moraceae, 238<br />
Morpho- <strong>and</strong> ontogenetic variation, 65–69<br />
Morrison, Wade, 846<br />
Mosla chinensis, 245<br />
Mosquitoes, 884<br />
Moths, 884–885<br />
Mouse plasmocytoma. See SP2/0 (mouse plasmocytoma)<br />
MS. See Mass spectrometry (MS)<br />
Mucolytic <strong>and</strong> Mucociliary Effects, 337–338<br />
Mucor, 738<br />
Mucor circinelloides, 759<br />
Mucor mucedo, 804<br />
Mucor plumbeus, 747, 756, 770, 775, 786,<br />
788, 789, 791, 802
Index 967<br />
Mucor polymorphosporus, 763<br />
Mucor ramannianus, 819<br />
Mucor spinosus, 763<br />
Mugwort, 245, 261<br />
Multicomponent samples, identification <strong>of</strong>, 27<br />
13<br />
C-NMR spectroscopy, 28–30<br />
IR spectroscopy, 28<br />
mass spectrometry, 28<br />
UV spectroscopy, 27–28<br />
Multidimensional gas chromatography (MDGC), 18,<br />
167–174<br />
Multidimensional liquid chromatographic techniques<br />
(MDLC), 174–176<br />
Multidrug resistance, 239<br />
Murine leukemia (P388), 239<br />
Musk, 849<br />
Mycobacterium smegmatis, 754, 755<br />
Myli-4-(15)-en-9-one (96a) biotransformation<br />
by Aspergillus niger, 759<br />
Mylia taylorii, 756, 761, 787<br />
Myoporum crassifolium, 138<br />
Myratenoic acid, 717<br />
Myrcene, 223, 238, 304, 587–588, 717, 720, 885<br />
Myrcene-3,(10)-epoxide, 720<br />
Myrcenol, 720<br />
Myrica gale L., 238<br />
Myricaceae, 238<br />
Myristic acid, 256<br />
Myrrh, 554<br />
Myrtaceae, 238, 239, 246, 247, 249, 250, 258, 262, 265<br />
Myrtanal, 689<br />
Myrtanol, 691, 717<br />
Myrte, 254<br />
Myrtenal, 689, 709, 717<br />
Myrtenic acid, 709<br />
Myrtenol, 690, 709, 717, 720<br />
Myrtle, 258<br />
Myrtle leaf, 888<br />
Myrtol, 262<br />
Myrtus communis, 258, 265, 888<br />
N<br />
NADP/NADPH, 122<br />
Naloxone, 242<br />
Naphthalene, 884<br />
Nardosinone (376), 800, 801<br />
Nardostachys chinensis, 749, 797<br />
Nasal decongestant, 334<br />
Nasturtium spp, 884<br />
Nasturtiums, 884<br />
Natural, definition <strong>of</strong>, 927–928, 933–935<br />
Natural aromas, 864<br />
Natural complex substances, 904, 928, 933, 936–937<br />
Naturally occurring alleged allergenic substances<br />
structures <strong>of</strong>, 921–922<br />
Nature-identical, 933<br />
Near infrared (NIR), 12<br />
Negro pepper, 262<br />
Neomenthol, 627<br />
Nepalese lemongrass, 569<br />
Nepeta cataria, 884<br />
Nepetalactones, 883<br />
Nepeta oils, 883<br />
Neral, 271<br />
Nerol, 588, 590, 714<br />
Nerolidol, 236, 237<br />
cis-Nerolidol (462), 813, 814, 816<br />
biotransformation by Glomerella cingulata, 816<br />
trans-Nerolidol (469), 821, 822, 824<br />
Neroli oil, 536<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 465–466<br />
obtained in dilution test, 467<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 468<br />
Neuro-2a (mouse neuroblastoma), 237, 247<br />
Neurospora crassa, 819<br />
Neurotoxic aromachemicals, 568<br />
Niaouli oil, 254<br />
Nicotiana tabacum, 613, 774, 776<br />
Nicotine, 884<br />
Nigella sativa, 237, 240, 268<br />
NIR. See Near infrared (NIR)<br />
NIR-FT-Raman spectroscopy, 28<br />
Nitric oxide, 242<br />
Nitrogen-containing compounds, 13<br />
Nitrogen–phosphorus detector, 13<br />
Nitro musks, 852<br />
Nitro triazolium blue, 258<br />
Nocardia corallina, 788, 790<br />
Noncommercial organizations, 895<br />
Nonenzymatic antioxidants, 256, 257<br />
Nonenzymatic lipid peroxidation, 265<br />
Nonvolatile precursors, volatile controlled release from,<br />
859–860<br />
Nootkatone (2) biotransformation<br />
by Aspergillus niger, 743–745<br />
by Fusarium culmorum <strong>and</strong> botryosphaeria<br />
dothidea, 745–749<br />
Nootkatone (2) production from valencene (1), 738–741<br />
Nopol, 699, 720<br />
Nopol benzylether, 699, 720<br />
Nopol benzylether (531), 831<br />
Nor-sesquiterpene ketone khusimone, 21<br />
Novak, Johannes, 91<br />
N-ras-Oncogene, 238<br />
N-ras transformed mouse myoblast cell line. See CO25<br />
(N-ras transformed mouse myoblast cell line)<br />
Nuclear-factor-κ-B (human mouth epidermal carcinoma<br />
cell line), 237<br />
Nuclear magnetic resonance, 117<br />
Nutmeg, 89<br />
Nutmeg oil, 536<br />
composition, with main hazardous constituents, 938<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 469–471<br />
obtained in dilution test, 472–473<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 473<br />
O<br />
Oakmoss, 921, 922, 923<br />
fragrance industry, 924<br />
Obovata, 249<br />
Ocimene, 259, 720<br />
trans-Ocimene, 305<br />
allo-Ocimene, 305<br />
Ocimum, 46
968 Index<br />
Ocimum basilicum, 219, 239, 269, 270, 298, 890<br />
Ocimum gratissimum, 249, 317, 318<br />
Ocimum micranthum, 243, 270, 890<br />
Ocimum volatile oils, 885<br />
Ocotea b<strong>of</strong>o, 263, 264<br />
Ocotea pretiosa, 569<br />
(Z)-9-Octadecenamide, 272<br />
Odor pleasantness, 287<br />
Odor, sex-specific effect <strong>of</strong>, 281<br />
Odor-active components, assessment <strong>of</strong>, 162–164<br />
Odorants, 283<br />
psychoactive effects, 290<br />
Odorous fatty oils, 88<br />
Oenothera biennis, 561<br />
Oil-laden steam, 111<br />
Oil <strong>of</strong> Geranium ISO/DIS 4730, 86<br />
<strong>Oils</strong> against pests<br />
antiparasitic, 885–886<br />
aphids, caterpillars, <strong>and</strong> whiteflies, 885<br />
ear mites, 885<br />
fleas <strong>and</strong> ticks, 884<br />
insecticidal, pest repellent, <strong>and</strong> antiparasitic oils, 884<br />
mosquitoes, 884<br />
moths, 884–885<br />
<strong>Oils</strong> attracting animals, 883<br />
<strong>Oils</strong> in animal feed<br />
pigs, 889–890<br />
poultry, 887–889<br />
ruminants, 886–887<br />
<strong>Oils</strong> repelling animals, 883–884<br />
<strong>Oils</strong> Treating Diseases, in Animals, 890–891<br />
Old Corner Drug Store, 846<br />
Olea europaea, 561<br />
Oleine, 845<br />
Oleoresins, 852<br />
Oleoropeic alcohol, 720<br />
Oleuropeic acid, 709<br />
Olfaction, 282<br />
Olibanum americanum, 554<br />
Olive, 561<br />
Omum, 267<br />
1α-Hydroxymaaliene (115) biotransformation<br />
by Aspergillus niger, 762<br />
On-line coupled liquid chromatography-gas<br />
chromatography, 176–177<br />
On-site/container distillation, 107<br />
Open mouth loading, 102<br />
Opoponax chironium, 554<br />
Opoponax, 554<br />
Orange, 848<br />
Orange oil, 254<br />
hazardous constituents, 938<br />
Orange peels, 297<br />
Orange terpenes, 563<br />
Oregano, 43, 44–45, 68, 883<br />
Oregano herb, 888<br />
Oregano oil, 45, 887, 888, 890<br />
Origanum, 45, 886<br />
Origanum acutidens, 266<br />
Origanum fl oribundum, 266<br />
Origanum gl<strong>and</strong>ulosum, 266<br />
Origanum majorana, 45, 266<br />
Origanum marjorana, 333<br />
Origanum onites, 45, 238, 316, 884, 888<br />
Origanum syriacum L., 265<br />
Origanum vulgare, 40, 888, 891<br />
Orris distillation, 107<br />
Ovalbumin, 251<br />
Oxidative stress, 256<br />
2-Oxo,3-hydroxygeraniol, 590<br />
6-Oxo-1,2-campholide, 719<br />
2-Oxo-1,8-cineole, 720<br />
3-Oxo-1,8-cineole, 720<br />
5-Oxocamphor, 719<br />
6-Oxocamphor, 719<br />
2-Oxo-cineole, 720<br />
3-Oxonopol-2′,4′-dihydroxybenzylether, 720<br />
9-Oxo-trans-nerolidol (487), 818<br />
3-Oxoverbenone, 720<br />
Oxygen radicals, 256<br />
Oxygen-containing compounds, 13<br />
P<br />
P388 (murine leukemia cell line), 237<br />
Padova System, 110<br />
Paecilomyces varioti, 791, 793<br />
Paeonia moutan, 250<br />
Pallavicinia subciliata, 740<br />
Palmolive, 844<br />
Palmolive–Peet, 844<br />
Panax ginseng, 806<br />
Papyrus Ebers, 555<br />
Papyrus Edwin Smith, 555<br />
Papyrus Hearst, 555<br />
Paranix®, 333<br />
Parasites, 885<br />
Parthe nium Tometosa, 759<br />
Parthenin (264a), 785<br />
Parthenium argentatum, 759<br />
Parthenolide (240), 780, 781<br />
Patchouli, 563, 900<br />
Patchouli alcohol, 230, 232<br />
Patchouli oil, 139<br />
Patchoulol (425) biotransformation<br />
by Botrytis cinerea, 810<br />
PBQ-induced abdominal constriction test, 240<br />
PC-3, 237<br />
PCI X 10 method, 191<br />
Peet, 844<br />
Pelargonium, 331, 551, 884<br />
Pelargonium graveolens, 249<br />
Pellatrici method, 97, 98<br />
Peltate gl<strong>and</strong>s, 40<br />
Pemberton French Wine Coca, 846<br />
Pemberton, John S., 846<br />
Penicillium chrysogenum, 788, 790<br />
Penicillium digitatum, 590, 594, 609, 720<br />
Penicillium frequentans, 765<br />
Penicillium janthinellum, 763<br />
Penicillium sclerotiorum, 792, 793, 796<br />
2,3-Pentyl-6-methyl-β- <strong>and</strong> -γ-cyclodextrin, 15<br />
Pentylenetetrazole-induced convulsions, 299<br />
Peppermint, 53, 54, 68, 69, 258, 291, 294, 552, 848<br />
Peppermint essential oil<br />
medical examinations, 328–329<br />
Peppermint herb oil, 68<br />
Peppermint oil, 221, 255, 536, 883, 885
Index 969<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 474–477<br />
obtained in dilution test, 478–480<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 481<br />
price graph <strong>of</strong>, 900, 901<br />
Pepsi-Cola, 846<br />
Perforated sieve-like plates, 102<br />
Perfume, 554–555<br />
methods <strong>of</strong> producing, 555<br />
Perfumery <strong>Technology</strong>, 850<br />
Perilla frutescens, 46<br />
Perilladehyde, 718<br />
Perillaldehyde, 272, 619, 709<br />
Perillic acid, 709, 718<br />
Perillyl alcohol, 236, 645, 711, 717, 718<br />
Perillyl alcohol-8,9-epoxide, 718<br />
Peritoneal leukocytes (ptls), 248<br />
Perkin Elmer gas chromatograph, 12<br />
Petitgrain still, 898<br />
Petitgrain, 848<br />
Phel<strong>and</strong>rol, 720<br />
Phell<strong>and</strong>ral, 620, 713, 720<br />
Phell<strong>and</strong>rene, 715, 717, 720<br />
Phell<strong>and</strong>ric acid, 720<br />
Phell<strong>and</strong>rol, 720<br />
Phellodendron sp., 65<br />
Phenol, 143, 144<br />
Phenotypic variation, in essential oils, 61<br />
2-Phenylethanol, 128<br />
2-Phenyl ethyl alcohol, 304<br />
Phenylpropanes, 904<br />
Philippe, King, 844<br />
phosphoenolpyruvate, 122<br />
Photosensitivity, 568<br />
Phototoxicity, 568<br />
Phyllosticta capsici, 783<br />
Physiological serum, 250<br />
Phytochemical variation<br />
chemotaxonomy, 41–42<br />
inter- <strong>and</strong> intraspecific variation, 42–52<br />
Phytol, 238<br />
Phytolacca americana, 829, 830<br />
Pigs, 889–890<br />
Pimpinella anisum, 884, 887, 891<br />
Pimpinella aurea, 891<br />
Pimpinella corymbosa, 891<br />
Pimpinella isaurica, 891<br />
Pinaceae, 237, 246, 265<br />
Pinane-2,3-diol, 692, 709<br />
Pine oil, 883<br />
Pine, 848<br />
Pinene, 223–225<br />
Pine-needle oil, 883<br />
Pinguisanol (373), 800<br />
Pinimenthol®, 342<br />
Pinocarveol, 691<br />
Pinocarvone, 65<br />
Pinus brutia, 885<br />
Pinus halepensis, 885<br />
Pinus longifolia, 229<br />
Pinus pinaster, 885<br />
Pinus pinea, 885<br />
Pinus radiate, 265<br />
Pinus sylvestris oil, 536<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 482–483<br />
obtained in dilution test, 484–485<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 486<br />
Pinyl cation, 709<br />
Pipe bundle condenser, 103<br />
Piperaceae, 265<br />
Piper crassinervium, 265<br />
Piperita, 900<br />
Piperitenol, 643<br />
Piperitenone, 711, 717, 718<br />
Piperonyl, 885<br />
Pipe-stem tree, 249<br />
Pityrosporum ovale, 319<br />
Placebo effect, 291<br />
Plagiochila fruticosa, 758<br />
Plagiochila sciophila, 757, 793, 795, 797<br />
Plagiochilide (105), 758<br />
Plagiochiline A (104), 758<br />
plagiochiline C (104) biotransformation<br />
by Aspergillus niger, 760<br />
Plant breeding<br />
<strong>and</strong> genetic variation. See Genetic variation <strong>and</strong><br />
plant breeding<br />
<strong>and</strong> intellectual property rights, 63<br />
plant protection (plant patents), 64–65<br />
plant variety protection, 64<br />
Plant material production, factors influencing, 60–71<br />
cultivation measures, contaminations, <strong>and</strong><br />
harvesting, 69–71<br />
environmental influences, 69<br />
genetic variation <strong>and</strong> plant breeding, 61–63<br />
intraindividual variation, between plant parts, 65–69<br />
plant breeding <strong>and</strong> intellectual property rights, 63–65<br />
Plant nutrition <strong>and</strong> fertilizing, 70<br />
Plants, 89, 90<br />
Plant sources, 187–188<br />
Plaque-reduction assay, 244<br />
Plasmodium falciparium, 788<br />
Plasmodium falciparum, 779<br />
Pleasant odors, 292, 296<br />
Pleurotus fl abellatus, 587, 720<br />
Pleurotus ostreatus, 803<br />
Pleurotus sajor-caju, 587, 720<br />
Poaceae Cymbopogon giganteus, 251<br />
Poaceae, 240, 249<br />
Pogostemon cablin, 323<br />
Polyanthes tuberose, 40<br />
Polydimethylsiloxane, 10<br />
Polygodial, 788<br />
Polygodiol (295), 791<br />
Polygonum hydropiper, 788<br />
Polyketides <strong>and</strong> lipids, 123–126<br />
Pomades, 844, 849<br />
Porella pettottetiana, 798<br />
Porella stephaniana, 765<br />
Porella vernicosa, 788<br />
Poronia punctata, 808<br />
Porophyllum ruderale, 248<br />
Porphyromonas gingivalis, 320, 321<br />
Portuguese Presidency Council, 928<br />
Poultry, 887–889<br />
CRINA Poultry Study, 887–888<br />
Herbromix Study, 888–889
970 Index<br />
Powis castle, 246<br />
Prawns Bergamot, 877–878<br />
Preparation, <strong>of</strong> essential oils, 5, 18–19<br />
industrial processes, 5<br />
laboratory-scale techniques, 5–6<br />
microsampling techniques, 6<br />
direct sampling, from secretory<br />
structures, 7–8<br />
headspace techniques, 8–10<br />
microdistillation, 6–7<br />
solid-phase microextraction, 10<br />
stir bar sorptive extraction <strong>and</strong> headspace sorptive<br />
extraction, 10–11<br />
Primrose, 561<br />
Processing <strong>of</strong> essential oils for flavor functions, 188<br />
Procter, William, 845<br />
Procter & Gamble (P&G), 845<br />
Production, <strong>of</strong> essential oils, 83, 84, 88–89<br />
agricultural crop establishment, 92–94<br />
biomass used, 91<br />
climate, 89–90<br />
commercial essential oil extraction methods, 95<br />
expression, 95–99<br />
harvest, timing <strong>of</strong>, 91–92<br />
insect stress <strong>and</strong> microorganisms, 90<br />
location, <strong>of</strong> oil cells, 91<br />
seed <strong>and</strong> clones, propagation from, 94–95<br />
soil quality <strong>and</strong> preparation, 90<br />
steam distillation, 99–117<br />
water stress <strong>and</strong> drought, 90<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>ragrances, 859<br />
Programmed temperature vaporization injector, 11<br />
Propionibacterium acnes, 317, 318<br />
Prostagl<strong>and</strong>in E2, 242<br />
Prostagl<strong>and</strong>ins, biosynthesis <strong>of</strong>, 125<br />
Protein engineering, 54<br />
Protium, 247<br />
Protium gr<strong>and</strong>ifolium, 247<br />
Protium hebetatum, 247<br />
Protium heptaphyllum, 247<br />
Protium lewellyni, 247<br />
Protium strumosum, 247<br />
Proton NMR spectroscopy, 28<br />
Prunus amygdalus var. dulcis, 561<br />
Prunus armeniaca, 561<br />
Pseudoisoeugenyl esters, 66<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 590<br />
Pseudomonas ceuciviae, 812<br />
Pseudomonas citronellolis, 589, 590<br />
Pseudomonas cruciviae, 807<br />
Pseudomonas incognita, 590, 591<br />
Pseudomonas mendocina, 590<br />
Pseudorabies virus (prv), 244<br />
Psidium guajava, 239, 250, 265<br />
Psidium widgrenianum, 250<br />
Psychopharmacology <strong>of</strong> essential oils, 297<br />
in animal models, 299<br />
aromatic plants, as sedatives or stimulants, 297–299<br />
mechanism <strong>of</strong> action, 302–306<br />
Pterocarpus santalinus, 765<br />
Pulegone, 225, 226, 306, 718<br />
Pulmonary function, 339<br />
Pyrethrosin (248c), 782<br />
Pyridine, 304<br />
Q<br />
Qualitative analysis <strong>of</strong> an essential oil, 29<br />
Quality Criteria <strong>and</strong> Specifics<br />
while H<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Oils</strong>, for Food Preparation,<br />
864–865<br />
Queen Hatshepsut, 843<br />
“Queen <strong>of</strong> Hungary Water”, 843<br />
Quinone transferase, 237<br />
R<br />
R43 Risk Phrase, 925<br />
R<strong>and</strong>om amplification <strong>of</strong> polymorphic DNA, 43<br />
Ranunculaceae, 237, 240, 251, 268<br />
Rapeseed oil, 141<br />
Raschig rings, 113<br />
Raspberry ketone (566), 830<br />
Rastrello, 96<br />
Rattus norvegicus, 248<br />
RAW 264.7 cells, 248<br />
R.C. Treatt & Co. Ltd, 899<br />
REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization <strong>of</strong><br />
Chemicals), 904<br />
Reactive Oxygen Species, 257<br />
Reboulia hemisphaerica, 795<br />
Refractive index, determination <strong>of</strong>, 153<br />
Registered cultivars, <strong>of</strong> essential oil plant, 62<br />
Registration, Evaluation, Authorization <strong>of</strong> Chemicals.<br />
See REACH (Registration, Evaluation,<br />
Authorization <strong>of</strong> Chemicals)<br />
Repair enzymes, 256, 257<br />
Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, 566, 925<br />
Resinoids, 937<br />
Resins, 844, 849<br />
Resources <strong>of</strong> essential oils, 54<br />
domestication <strong>and</strong> systematic cultivation, 59–60<br />
plant material production, factors influencing, 60–71<br />
wild collection <strong>and</strong> sustainability, 58–59<br />
Respiratory drive <strong>and</strong> respiratory comfort, 335<br />
Reticular activating system, 283, 284<br />
Reverchon “Grosso”, 241<br />
Rf values, 156<br />
Rhipicephalus turanicus, 884<br />
Rhizopus arrhizus, 787, 788, 789, 791<br />
Rhizopus nigricans, 774, 776, 777, 778, 781, 782<br />
Rhizopus oryzae, 761, 768, 770, 780, 782<br />
Rhizopus stolonifer, 770, 775<br />
Rhizopus stolonifera, 802, 808<br />
Rhizpctonia solani, 783<br />
Rhodotorula glutinus, 787, 789<br />
Rhodotorula minuta, 824<br />
Rhodotorula rubra, 778, 781<br />
Rhodotorula sp., 608<br />
Ribes nigrum L., 272<br />
RLCC. See Rotation locular countercurrent<br />
chromatography (RLCC)<br />
Robinson, Frank, 846<br />
Rock samphire, 264<br />
Root essential oil, 65–66<br />
Ropadiar ® , 890<br />
Rosa centifolia, 330<br />
Rosa mosqueta, 561<br />
Rosa spp., 40
Index 971<br />
Rose alcohols, 133<br />
Rose-Cider, 870–871<br />
Rose geranium, 249<br />
Rose hip seed, 561<br />
Rosemary, 255, 269, 294, 552, 563, 848, 884<br />
Rosemary oil, 536<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 487–492<br />
obtained in dilution test, 493–497<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 498–499<br />
Rose oil, 10, 300<br />
Rose Semifreddo, 879–880<br />
Rosewood oils, 86<br />
Rosmarinus <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis, 70, 264, 269, 320, 333, 575,<br />
884, 885<br />
Rotation locular countercurrent chromatography<br />
(RLCC), 20–21<br />
Rowachol, 325<br />
Rowatinex, 325<br />
RP-18 HPLC, 19<br />
Rubus idaeus, 829<br />
Rue, 884<br />
Ruminants, 886–887<br />
Rutaceae, 95, 236, 252, 263<br />
Ruta graveolens, 884<br />
S<br />
Sacaca, Euphorbiaceae, 247<br />
Safety evaluation <strong>of</strong> essential oils, 185–187<br />
constituent-based evaluation, 187<br />
constituents, <strong>and</strong> congeneric groups, safety<br />
considerations for, 193–195<br />
food, scope in, 187<br />
chemical assay requirements <strong>and</strong> chemical<br />
description, 190–193<br />
chemical composition <strong>and</strong> congeneric groups,<br />
188–190<br />
flavor functions, processing for, 188<br />
plant sources, 187–188<br />
guide <strong>and</strong> example, 195–204<br />
Safrol, 306<br />
Safrole, 930, 931<br />
Sage, 42, 884<br />
Sage leaf, 888<br />
St Louis World’s Fair, 846<br />
Salads, 872–873<br />
Salicylic acid, 127<br />
Salinity, 70<br />
Salmonella, 888<br />
Salmonella choleraesuis, 888<br />
Salmonella essen, 888<br />
Salmonella typhimurium, 888<br />
Salt stress, 70<br />
Salvia africana-caerulea, 252<br />
Salvia africana-lutea, 252<br />
Salvia chamelaeagnea, 252<br />
Salvia fruticosa, 42, 264, 888<br />
Salvia. fruticosa, 42<br />
Salvia L., 42, 264<br />
Salvia lanceolata, 252<br />
Salvia <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis, 42, 43, 884<br />
Salvia repens, 264<br />
Salvia runcinata, 264<br />
Salvia sclarea, 330<br />
Salvia stenophylla, 264<br />
S<strong>and</strong>alwood, 554<br />
Santalaceae, 244<br />
Santalol (503), 823<br />
Santalum album, 244, 554<br />
Santolina triene, 250<br />
Sapodilla tree gum, 846<br />
Sarcoptes scabiei, 317<br />
Sassafras, 569<br />
Sassafras oil, 899<br />
Saturated ketone, 667, 701<br />
Satureja hortensis, 267<br />
Satureja hortensis, 240, 241<br />
Satureja khuzestanica, 252, 333<br />
Satureja montana L., 267, 268<br />
Satureja thymbra, 241<br />
Saussurea, 779<br />
Saussurea radix, 767<br />
Savory, 267, 268<br />
Scavangers, 256<br />
Schizogenic oil ducts, 40<br />
Schizosaccharomyces pombe, 804<br />
Schueller, Eugene, 845<br />
Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products <strong>and</strong><br />
Non-Food Products Intended for<br />
Consumers, 918–920<br />
Sclareolide (402), 803<br />
(+)-Sclareolide (402), 805, 806<br />
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumn, 783<br />
Scodella method, 97<br />
Scrophulariaceae, 246<br />
Sea purslane, 259<br />
Sea wormwood, 260<br />
Secretory structures, direct sampling from, 7–8<br />
Seed <strong>and</strong> clones, propagation from, 94–95<br />
Selected st<strong>and</strong>ard price, <strong>and</strong> organic essential oils, 851<br />
Selective ion monitoring, 21<br />
Semmler, F. W., 4<br />
Semple, William, 846<br />
Senecio mikanioides O., 237<br />
Sensory memory, 293<br />
Sesquiterpene-less essential oils, 114<br />
Sesquiterpenes, 41, 130, 135–140, 250, 820–823, 904<br />
by cytochrome p-450, 819<br />
by insects, 819<br />
by mammals, 819<br />
by microorganisms, 738<br />
Sesquiterpenes metabolism<br />
caryophyllene, 227, 229<br />
farnesol, 227, 229, 231<br />
longifolene, 229, 231<br />
patchouli alcohol, 230<br />
Sesuvium portulacastrum, 259<br />
7α-Hydroxyfrullanolide (223), 778<br />
Seventh Amendment <strong>of</strong> Cosmetic Directive, 920–921<br />
SFC. See Supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC)<br />
SFC-MS <strong>and</strong> SFC-FTIR spectroscopy, couplings <strong>of</strong>, 27<br />
Sfumatrici methods, 97<br />
Shell ginger, 242<br />
Shikimic acid derivatives, 126–129<br />
Shiromodiol diacetate (136), 765<br />
Shisool, 718<br />
Shisool-8,9-epoxide, 718
972 Index<br />
6-Shogaol (608), 834<br />
Sideritis varoi, 764<br />
Silica gel, 19<br />
Silver pipestem tree, 249<br />
Simmondsia californica, 561<br />
Sister-chromatid-exchange assay, 238<br />
Sluggish wormwood, 260<br />
Sobrerol, 709, 717, 720<br />
Soda water, 845<br />
Sodium lauryl sulphate, 256<br />
Soil quality <strong>and</strong> preparation, 90<br />
Soledum®, 336<br />
Solidago altissima, 757, 763, 820<br />
Solid-phase microextraction, 6, 10, 17<br />
Solubility test, 153–154<br />
Solvent vapor exit, 25<br />
Šorm, F., 4<br />
Soups, 871<br />
Sources, <strong>of</strong> essential oils, 39<br />
genetic <strong>and</strong> protein engineering, 53–54<br />
identification, <strong>of</strong> source materials, 52–53<br />
international st<strong>and</strong>ards, for wild collection <strong>and</strong><br />
cultivation<br />
FairWild, 73<br />
GA(C)P, 72<br />
ISSC-MAP, 72–73<br />
phytochemical variation<br />
chemotaxonomy, 41–42<br />
inter- <strong>and</strong> intraspecific variation, 42–52<br />
resources <strong>of</strong> essential oils, 54<br />
domestication <strong>and</strong> systematic cultivation, 59–60<br />
plant material production, factors influencing,<br />
60–71<br />
wild collection <strong>and</strong> sustainability, 58–59<br />
South American orange juice factory, 897<br />
Soya bean, 561<br />
SP2/0 (mouse plasmocytoma), 237, 247<br />
Span 80, 256<br />
Spathulenol, 250<br />
Spathulenol (94), 756<br />
biotransformation by Aspergillus niger, 759<br />
(−)Spathulenol, 244<br />
Special sfumatrici method, 97<br />
Spectrophotometric assay, 257<br />
Sphaeranthus indicus, 775<br />
Spice rack, <strong>of</strong> essential oils<br />
oil mixture <strong>and</strong> oil seasoning, preparation <strong>of</strong>,<br />
866–867<br />
Spiked thyme, 269<br />
Spike lavender, 556<br />
Spodoptera litura, 596, 720<br />
Spodptera litura, 610<br />
Spontaneous electroencephalogram activity, 285–289<br />
Sporotrichum pulverulentum, 785<br />
Squamulosone (77), 756<br />
biotransformation by Mucor plumbeus, 758<br />
Staphylococcus aureus, 323, 788<br />
Staphylococcus epidermidis, 323, 804<br />
Star anise oil, 536<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 500–501<br />
obtained in dilution test, 502<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 502<br />
Steam distillation, 99–117<br />
Stir bar sorptive extraction, 10–11<br />
Storage <strong>and</strong> transport, <strong>of</strong> essential oils<br />
dangerous substance <strong>and</strong> dangerous goods, 907–908<br />
illegal marketing, in EU, 905–907<br />
labeling, 910–912<br />
marketing, 903–905<br />
packing <strong>of</strong> dangerous goods, 908–910<br />
Strawberry everlasting, 249<br />
Strawflower, 261<br />
Streblus asper Lour., 238<br />
Streptococcus mutans, 320<br />
Streptomyces bottropensis, 717<br />
Streptomyces fulvissimus, 777, 778, 781<br />
Streptomyces ikutamanensis, 593<br />
Styrax, 554<br />
Styrax <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis, 554<br />
Styrene monomer/propylene oxide process, 142<br />
Subambient trapping technique, 23<br />
Substances<br />
in flavorings <strong>and</strong> food ingredients, 931–932<br />
not added, to food, 930<br />
Sug<strong>and</strong>ha kokila oil, 569<br />
Summer savory, 240, 267<br />
Sunflower, 561<br />
Supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC), 20<br />
Supercritical fluid chromatography-gas chromatography,<br />
26–27<br />
Supercritical fluid extraction-gas chromatography, 26<br />
Superficial cells, 91<br />
Superoxide anions, 258<br />
Superoxide dismutase, 256<br />
Superoxide radical, 256<br />
Supply chain flowchart<br />
from distiller to finished products, 897<br />
Suprathreshold fragrances, 295<br />
Sweet basil, 269<br />
Sweet Florentine, 880<br />
Sweet orange oil, 536<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 503–507<br />
obtained in dilution test, 508–510<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 511<br />
Synthesis <strong>of</strong> essential oil components, 140–149<br />
Syphacia obvelata, 885<br />
Syrian oregano, 265<br />
Syrup Mint-Orange, 871<br />
Syzygium aromaticum, 271, 331, 885<br />
T<br />
Tagetes, 46, 48, 567, 884<br />
Tagetes lucida, 48<br />
Tagetes minuta L., 67<br />
Tagetes oil, 569<br />
Tail-fl ick test, 240<br />
Tanacetum parthenium, 777, 884<br />
Tanaka, 263<br />
Tansy, 884<br />
Tapenade, 873–874<br />
Tarbush, 886<br />
Tarocco, 263<br />
Tarocco orange, 263<br />
TAS procedure, 8<br />
TCD. See Thermal conductivity detector (TCD)
Index 973<br />
Tea tree, 238, 244, 262, 536, 848<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 512<br />
obtained in dilution test, 513–519<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 520<br />
Temperature, 89<br />
Terpene alcohols, 593<br />
Terpene und Campher, 4<br />
Terpene-less essential oils, 114<br />
Terpenes, 4, 151<br />
Terpenoids, 129–130<br />
hemiterpenoids, 131<br />
monoterpenoids, 131–135<br />
sesquiterpenoids, 135–140<br />
Terpenoids metabolism, in animal models <strong>and</strong> humans,<br />
209–210<br />
monoterpenes<br />
α- <strong>and</strong> β-thujone, 225–226, 228<br />
α-terpineol, 225, 226<br />
camphene, 210<br />
camphor, 210–212<br />
carvacrol, 212<br />
carvone, 213<br />
1,4-cineole, 213–214<br />
1,8-cineole, 214–216<br />
citral, 216–217<br />
citronellal, 217<br />
fenchone, 217–218<br />
geraniol, 218<br />
limonene, 218–219, 220<br />
linalool, 219, 221<br />
linalyl acetate, 221<br />
menthol, 221–222<br />
myrcene, 223<br />
pinene, 223–225<br />
pulegone, 225<br />
thymol, 226<br />
sesquiterpenes<br />
caryophyllene, 227, 229<br />
longifolene, 229, 231<br />
patchouli alcohol, 230<br />
Terpentine-4-ol, 65<br />
Terpine hydrate, 709<br />
Terpinen-4-ol, 244, 247, 255, 720<br />
(-)-Terpinen-4-ol, 631<br />
Terpineol, 844<br />
4-Terpineol, 717<br />
Terpinolene, 267, 616<br />
Tessaria absinthioides, 245<br />
Tessaria, 245<br />
12-Tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate, 253<br />
1,2,4b,5α-Tetrahydro-α-santonin (214), 777<br />
Tetrahydronootkatone (22) biotransformation<br />
by Aspergillus niger, 748<br />
Tetrahydrosantonin (210), 776<br />
Teucrin A, 930<br />
Teucrium marum, 272<br />
Teucrium polium L., 241<br />
Texarome, 110<br />
Texila museum, 844<br />
Thermal conductivity detector (TCD), 12<br />
Thermal modulator, 171<br />
θ rhythm, 285<br />
Thin-layer chromatography (TLC), 12, 155–156, 257<br />
Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, 258, 266, 269,<br />
270, 272<br />
Thresholds <strong>of</strong> toxicological concern, 198<br />
Thuja orientalis, 246<br />
Thujone, 305, 709, 717<br />
Thujopsene, 250<br />
Thujopsis dolabrata, 830<br />
Thujoyl alcohol, 717<br />
Thymbra spicata, 269<br />
Thyme oils, 259, 536, 884<br />
inhibitory data<br />
obtained in agar diffusion test, 521–524<br />
obtained in dilution test, 525–531<br />
obtained in vapor phase test, 532–533<br />
Thymol, 226, 229, 260, 268, 304, 631, 712, 885<br />
Thymol (580), 831<br />
Thymol methyl ether, 631<br />
Thymoquinone, 237, 240, 252, 268<br />
Thymus, 259<br />
Thymus camphorates, 259<br />
Thymus capitata, 260<br />
Thymus mastichina, 259<br />
Thymus pectinatus, 259, 260<br />
Thymus porlock, 258, 269<br />
Thymus serpyllus, 260<br />
Thymus spathulifolius, 260<br />
Thymus vulgaris, 26, 52, 260, 263, 267, 270, 272, 320,<br />
575, 884<br />
Thymus zygis, 259, 268, 888<br />
Tiger Balm, 552<br />
Tinctures, 844, 849<br />
Tinea pedis, 576<br />
TLC. See Thin-layer chromatography (TLC)<br />
TNF-α. See Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), 246<br />
T<strong>of</strong>u Aromanaise, 874<br />
Toluene, 143, 145<br />
Toluene-ethyl-acetate, 257<br />
Toothpastes, 850<br />
TPN/TPNH, 122<br />
Trachyspermum ammi, 267<br />
Traditional Chinese Medicine, 298, 863<br />
Transgenic or genetically modified organisms, 53<br />
Trazodone hydrochloride, 255<br />
Tree moss, 921, 922, 923, 924<br />
Treibs, W., 4<br />
Trichocephalus muris, 885<br />
Trichomonas vaginalis, 885<br />
Trichophyton mentagrophytes, 319<br />
Trichophyton rubrum, 319<br />
Trichophyton tonsurans, 319<br />
Trichophyton violaceum, 319<br />
Trichuris muris, 885<br />
Trifolium repens, 884<br />
Trigeminal system, 283<br />
Trinornardosinone (380), 801<br />
2,3,5-Triphenyltetrazolium chloride, 354<br />
Triticum vulgare, 561<br />
TRPM8, 334<br />
Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), 246<br />
Turbo distillation, 105<br />
Turmeric, 267<br />
Turpentine, 145, 552<br />
Turpentine oil, 536, 899<br />
Tween 80, 256
974 Index<br />
Twister, 10<br />
2α-Hydroxy-1,8-cineole, 717<br />
2-β-Pinene, 259<br />
2ent-10β-Hydroxycyclocolorenone (96) transformation<br />
Two-dimensional GC, 15–18<br />
U<br />
Ultrafast module-GC, 161<br />
Ultraviolet spectroscopy, 5, 27–28<br />
Umbelliferae, 65<br />
UN-approved packing, 909<br />
UN/ID numbers, 909<br />
United States Patent 4735803, 883<br />
United States Patent 4847292, 883<br />
Unpleasant fragrances, 295<br />
UVCB, 905, 906, 907<br />
V<br />
Valencene (1) biotransformation<br />
by Aspergillus niger, 741–743<br />
by Aspergillus wentii, 741–743<br />
Valeriana <strong>of</strong>fi cinalis, 747<br />
Valeriana oils, 883<br />
Valerianol (35a) biotransforamtion<br />
by Mucor plumbeus, 750<br />
Valia–Chien horizontal diffusion cells, 254<br />
Vanillin, 129, 844<br />
Vapor phase test (VPT), 355<br />
anise oil, 364<br />
bitter fennel, 371<br />
caraway oil, 379<br />
cassia oil, 382<br />
Ceylon cinnamon bark oil, 389<br />
Ceylon cinnamon leaf oil, 392<br />
citronella oil, 399<br />
clary sage oil, 403<br />
clove leaf oil, 413<br />
cori<strong>and</strong>er oil, 420<br />
dwarf pine oil, 422<br />
eucalyptus oil, 428<br />
juniper oil, 433<br />
lavender oil, 440–441<br />
lemon oil, 450<br />
m<strong>and</strong>arin oil, 454<br />
matricaria oil, 460<br />
mint oil, 464<br />
neroli oil, 468<br />
nutmeg oil, 473<br />
peppermint oil, 481<br />
Pinus sylvestris oil, 486<br />
rosemary oil, 498–499<br />
star anise oil, 502<br />
sweet orange oil, 511<br />
tea tree oil, 520<br />
thyme oils, 532–533<br />
Vaporub®, 341<br />
Veggie Skewers, 874–875<br />
Veillonella sp., 321<br />
Verbanone-7-al, 717<br />
Verbenaceae, 42–46, 245, 249<br />
Verbenol, 699, 709, 717<br />
Verbenone, 717<br />
Vermouth, 260<br />
Vernonia arborea, 783<br />
Vero, 244<br />
Veterinary medicine, essential oils use in<br />
in animal feed<br />
pigs, 889–890<br />
poultry, 887–889<br />
ruminants, 886–887<br />
attracting animals, 883<br />
against pests<br />
antiparasitic, 885–886<br />
aphids, caterpillars, <strong>and</strong> whiteflies, 885<br />
ear mites, 885<br />
fleas <strong>and</strong> ticks, 884<br />
insecticidal, pest repellent, <strong>and</strong> antiparasitic oils,<br />
884<br />
mosquitoes, 884<br />
moths, 884–885<br />
repelling animals, 883–884<br />
treating diseases, in animals, 890–891<br />
Veterinary papyrus, 555<br />
Vetiver oil, 21, 139<br />
GC-EIMS-MS <strong>of</strong> khusimone <strong>of</strong>, 22<br />
Vetiveria zizanioides, 40<br />
Vetivert, 848<br />
Vicks VapoRub, 552<br />
Vigilance, 290, 291<br />
Viridiflorene, 239<br />
Virucidal effect, 245<br />
Visual information processing, physico-chemical odorant<br />
properties on, 292<br />
Vitamin C, 256<br />
Vitamin E, 262<br />
Vitex obovata, 249<br />
Vitex pooara, 249<br />
Vitex rehmanni, 249<br />
Vitex zeyheri, 249<br />
Vitis vinifera, 561<br />
Volatile alcohols, 904<br />
Volatile encapsulation, 856<br />
introduction <strong>of</strong>, 857<br />
Volatile oils, 88<br />
Volatiles<br />
alganite, 859<br />
control release <strong>of</strong>, 856–858<br />
from non-volatile precursors, 859–860<br />
cyclodextrin complexation <strong>of</strong>, 860<br />
essential oil constituents, stabilization <strong>of</strong>, 859<br />
hydrophilic polymers, use <strong>of</strong>, 858<br />
Von Baeyer, A., 4<br />
VPT. See Vapor phase test (VPT)<br />
W<br />
Wagner, G., 4<br />
Wagner–Meerwein rearrangement, 4<br />
Wallach, O., 4<br />
Waterberg poora-berry, 249<br />
Water stress <strong>and</strong> drought, 90<br />
Wells, F.V., 850<br />
Wheatgerm, 561<br />
Whitebrush, 245<br />
White clover, 884<br />
Whiteflies, 885
Index 975<br />
Widdrol (448) biotransformation<br />
by Aspergillus niger, 812<br />
Wild c<strong>of</strong>fee, 250<br />
Wild collection <strong>and</strong> cultivation, international<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ards for<br />
FairWild, 73<br />
GA(C)P, 72<br />
ISSC-MAP, 72–73<br />
Wild collection <strong>and</strong> sustainability, 58–59<br />
Wilmsii, 249<br />
Wintergreen, 886<br />
Wintergreen oil, 883<br />
The Wise <strong>of</strong> France, 843<br />
Wood oils, 91<br />
Woodward, R. B., 5<br />
Woodward rules, 5<br />
World consumption, <strong>of</strong> major essential oils, 847<br />
World map, <strong>of</strong> essential oils, 896<br />
Wormwood, 260, 884<br />
Wrigley, William, 846<br />
Wrigley’s Spearmint, 846<br />
Writhings, 240<br />
X<br />
Xanthine, 258<br />
Xanthine–xanthine assay, 258, 262<br />
Xenopus laevis, 568<br />
X-ray diffraction, 254<br />
Xylopia aethiopica, 238<br />
Y<br />
Yardley, 844<br />
Yarrow, 261<br />
Yellow balsam, 239<br />
Yellow rot <strong>of</strong> lav<strong>and</strong>in, 70<br />
Yerba porosa, 248<br />
Ylang complete, 105<br />
Ylang, 255<br />
Ylang-Ylang, 104, 563<br />
Z<br />
Zaluzanin D (258), 785<br />
Zataria, 241<br />
Zataria, Lamiaceae, 269<br />
Zataria multifl ora, 241, 269, 319, 333<br />
Zerumbone (408), 804, 808<br />
Zinc selenide (ZnSe), 23<br />
Zingeber <strong>of</strong>fi cinale, 829, 834<br />
Zingerone (574), 830<br />
Zingiberaceae, 65, 242, 248, 253, 254, 267, 272<br />
Zingiber <strong>of</strong>fi cinale, 253, 329, 331, 885<br />
Zingiber zerumbet, 804<br />
Ziziphora clinopodioides, 260
FIGURE 4.3 Lavender drying on the field.
FIGURE 4.4 Parts <strong>of</strong> a citrus fruit.
FIGURE 4.5 “Pellatrici method.” The spiked Archimedes screw with lemons, washed with water.<br />
FIGURE 4.6 “Brown” process. A battery <strong>of</strong> eight juice squeezers waiting for fruits.
FIGURE 4.7 FMC extractor.<br />
FIGURE 4.18 Oil <strong>and</strong> muddy water in the Florentine flask.