14-05-2024 21:43
Thierry BlondelleBonjour,A côté de Hystérographium fraxini, ces
14-05-2024 09:19
Hans-Otto BaralHi, I want to announce for next Sunday 17.00 middl
14-05-2024 19:48
B Shelbourne• Hymenoscyphus: Habitat, macro, spores, paraphy
13-05-2024 12:48
Eduard OsieckAfter eight years (*) I found the same apiosporous
11-05-2024 18:08
B Shelbourne• Mollisia on tree leaves: On dead Quercus leave
12-05-2024 11:48
Michel HairaudBonjour , Voici une récolte d'une Rhytismataceae
10-05-2024 17:40
Anna KlosGood afternoon, Thursday during an inventory we f
11-05-2024 00:33
Ethan CrensonI'm not entirely sure that Encoelia-like is the ri
Pseudombrophila dentata?
Christiane Baethcke,
01-02-2012 12:44
I have watched this forum quite some time. Today is the first time that I place a topic. Therefore I first want to introduce myself. I am 58 years old, born in Germany and live about 30 years in the Netherlands. I am busy on an amateuristic but intensiv manner with fungi and specially ascomyceets since a few years. The coprophile fungi have at this moment my special interest. I am growing them in wet boxes near the window.
I found on rabbit dung a Pseudombrophila. I think that it could be P. dentata. There is no exact description in Doveri about it. I am not sure, it might be P. bulbifera as well. My measured spores are in average a bit greater than measured by the one shown on this site. Is there anyone who can confirm my determination or has literature about that Pseudombrophilia dentata? Pseudombrophilia with round spores are not found in the Netherlands before, it would be a new soort for the Netherlands.
Kind regards
Christiane
Ron Bronckers,
01-02-2012 13:50
Re : Pseudombrophilia dentata?
Hello Christiane,
According to van Brummelen (1995) in his World-Monograph Pseudombrophila dentata has ascospores less than 10 µm in diameter.
P. bulbifera on the other hand has ascospores more than 10 µm in diameter, it also has small sclerotia (especially in cultures) and a well developed subiculum.
This last feature is not always as well developed as it could be.
You most likely found P. bulbifera.
This probably is the first record in the Netherlands so safe some material.
Kind regards - Met vriendelijke groet,
Ron
According to van Brummelen (1995) in his World-Monograph Pseudombrophila dentata has ascospores less than 10 µm in diameter.
P. bulbifera on the other hand has ascospores more than 10 µm in diameter, it also has small sclerotia (especially in cultures) and a well developed subiculum.
This last feature is not always as well developed as it could be.
You most likely found P. bulbifera.
This probably is the first record in the Netherlands so safe some material.
Kind regards - Met vriendelijke groet,
Ron
Michel Delpont,
01-02-2012 14:17
Re : Pseudombrophilia dentata?
Hello Christiane
Agree with Ron P.dentata, this one also has smaller apothecia that P.bulbifera. Congratulations on this find.
Regards.
Michel.
Agree with Ron P.dentata, this one also has smaller apothecia that P.bulbifera. Congratulations on this find.
Regards.
Michel.
René Dougoud,
01-02-2012 14:39
Re : Pseudombrophilia dentata?
Chère Christiane,
OK également pour Pseudombrophila bulbifera (Durand) Brummelen. Oui, les ascospores de cette espèce sont sphériques ou presque et mesurent, selon Brummelen, (9,5-)10-12,5(13) x (9,5-)10-12.3(12,5) ou 9,5-12,5(13) µm de diamètre et elles possèdent un contenu jaune dans le protoplasme, qu'on peut voir sur vos photos.
Très intéressante espèce !
Cordialement
René
OK également pour Pseudombrophila bulbifera (Durand) Brummelen. Oui, les ascospores de cette espèce sont sphériques ou presque et mesurent, selon Brummelen, (9,5-)10-12,5(13) x (9,5-)10-12.3(12,5) ou 9,5-12,5(13) µm de diamètre et elles possèdent un contenu jaune dans le protoplasme, qu'on peut voir sur vos photos.
Très intéressante espèce !
Cordialement
René
Neven Matocec,
01-02-2012 14:43
Re : Pseudombrophilia dentata?
Hi Christiane,
I surely agree with Ron, Michel and Rene! Also, would like to add even though I have never met any of these two sphaerosporic species that P. dentata should have (according not only to Brummelen 1995) more developed membranaceous margin often resulting in denticulate pattern (species name!) when apothecia are expanded. Your P. bulbifera has more scurfy structured margin, nicely documented by your excellent macrophotograph!
This collection surely deserves to be saved as an exsiccatum! What is also rather interesting in your obsevation is that you detected hair amiloidity! I can only encourage you to use lugol (by adding a drop on the cover slide edge) on every freshly prepared material you make in tap water medium!
Best wishes and good luck with your future work!
Neven
I surely agree with Ron, Michel and Rene! Also, would like to add even though I have never met any of these two sphaerosporic species that P. dentata should have (according not only to Brummelen 1995) more developed membranaceous margin often resulting in denticulate pattern (species name!) when apothecia are expanded. Your P. bulbifera has more scurfy structured margin, nicely documented by your excellent macrophotograph!
This collection surely deserves to be saved as an exsiccatum! What is also rather interesting in your obsevation is that you detected hair amiloidity! I can only encourage you to use lugol (by adding a drop on the cover slide edge) on every freshly prepared material you make in tap water medium!
Best wishes and good luck with your future work!
Neven
Christiane Baethcke,
02-02-2012 11:14
Re : Pseudombrophila dentata?
Thank you all for your determination help and encouragement
Kind regards - Met vriendelijke groet
Christiane
Kind regards - Met vriendelijke groet
Christiane
Raúl Tena Lahoz,
15-04-2012 19:30
Re : Pseudombrophilia dentata?
Hi all!
Today I have been studying Pseudombrophila bulbifera. Searching for info about it I stopped here. I tested with Lugol and I have not found hair amiloidity in my species. So I think that Christiane´s species can be an inmature Ascobolus brassicae, and what is seen stained in blue in her micro images can be the asci.
Cheers,
Raúl
Today I have been studying Pseudombrophila bulbifera. Searching for info about it I stopped here. I tested with Lugol and I have not found hair amiloidity in my species. So I think that Christiane´s species can be an inmature Ascobolus brassicae, and what is seen stained in blue in her micro images can be the asci.
Cheers,
Raúl
Neven Matocec,
16-04-2012 07:26
Re : Pseudombrophila dentata?
Hi Raul! Hi Christiane!
Your distant-made-revision sounds very interesting! Good thinking! The spores fit nicely to the mature ones of A. brassicae too! And really, what is blue in Christiane's pic might be immature asci instead of hairs but what is trouble here is:
(1) ascospores still without ornamentation in A. brassicae should be smaller (at least concerning to those (four) collections that I've studied so far
(2) those ascospores (in lugol) looking completed to me as they are refractive and not vacuolate, also with rather completed wall thickness.
What might got happened here is that we had deviation I experienced with A. albidus for several times. In this species in some cases the ascospores may complete their development remaining hyaline without production of dark stripped ornamentation. I was so misguided by this that I thought I got an undescribed genus when I first saw this! Such spores were even capable to be normally ejected from living mature asci but did not have any germinated!
So, Christiane, can you try to get back to it: Do you remember or perhaps noted if ascospores were launched readily from asci or at least did you observed such refractive spores freely floating around the section without application of any squash (pressure) on the cover slip?
Cheers,
Neven
Your distant-made-revision sounds very interesting! Good thinking! The spores fit nicely to the mature ones of A. brassicae too! And really, what is blue in Christiane's pic might be immature asci instead of hairs but what is trouble here is:
(1) ascospores still without ornamentation in A. brassicae should be smaller (at least concerning to those (four) collections that I've studied so far
(2) those ascospores (in lugol) looking completed to me as they are refractive and not vacuolate, also with rather completed wall thickness.
What might got happened here is that we had deviation I experienced with A. albidus for several times. In this species in some cases the ascospores may complete their development remaining hyaline without production of dark stripped ornamentation. I was so misguided by this that I thought I got an undescribed genus when I first saw this! Such spores were even capable to be normally ejected from living mature asci but did not have any germinated!
So, Christiane, can you try to get back to it: Do you remember or perhaps noted if ascospores were launched readily from asci or at least did you observed such refractive spores freely floating around the section without application of any squash (pressure) on the cover slip?
Cheers,
Neven
Christiane Baethcke,
16-04-2012 10:21
Re : Pseudombrophila dentata?
Hallo everybody,
Thank you all for looking once more at this topic and reconsidering the species. I can understand the doubt about the collection, because the similarities with A. brassicae are obvious. I too had and still have some doubts about it. The size of the spores resemble those of A. brassicae very well.
What did me think about not being A.brassicae was the missing ornamentation in the far developed state of the spores. Further I had never seen before such light brown colored hairs at the margin by A. brassica, a species I find here very often on rabbit dung. Another point was the difference in spore size in the asci of that collection. Some of them were (not always) much bigger in than others one ascus. I don´t have the world monograph of the genus Pseudombrophila of van Brummelen here, but I think that he wrote something about it, that often not all of the spores from P.bulbifera get fully matured. Indeed I found only few free ascispores in my preparations, but I did found some asci with open operculum.
Cheers
Christiane
Thank you all for looking once more at this topic and reconsidering the species. I can understand the doubt about the collection, because the similarities with A. brassicae are obvious. I too had and still have some doubts about it. The size of the spores resemble those of A. brassicae very well.
What did me think about not being A.brassicae was the missing ornamentation in the far developed state of the spores. Further I had never seen before such light brown colored hairs at the margin by A. brassica, a species I find here very often on rabbit dung. Another point was the difference in spore size in the asci of that collection. Some of them were (not always) much bigger in than others one ascus. I don´t have the world monograph of the genus Pseudombrophila of van Brummelen here, but I think that he wrote something about it, that often not all of the spores from P.bulbifera get fully matured. Indeed I found only few free ascispores in my preparations, but I did found some asci with open operculum.
Cheers
Christiane
Neven Matocec,
16-04-2012 11:16
Re : Pseudombrophila dentata?
Hi Christiane!
Your newly posted pics clearly demonstrate the lensiform operculum that is typical for Ascobolaceae! That do bring additional light on this problem! It is more and more likely to be the aberrant form of A. brassicae I have never seen so far or something new, at least to me (regarding the hairs!). This remains very interesting collection though!
Should you still have this material at your hand, it would be worth to try stain the unsqashed mature asci (with original periascal mucus intact) with lugol (living or dead). It is best to try make as thin apothecial vertical median section by hand as possible. In that way squash will not be necessary to see all cell types individually.
Cheers,
Neven
Your newly posted pics clearly demonstrate the lensiform operculum that is typical for Ascobolaceae! That do bring additional light on this problem! It is more and more likely to be the aberrant form of A. brassicae I have never seen so far or something new, at least to me (regarding the hairs!). This remains very interesting collection though!
Should you still have this material at your hand, it would be worth to try stain the unsqashed mature asci (with original periascal mucus intact) with lugol (living or dead). It is best to try make as thin apothecial vertical median section by hand as possible. In that way squash will not be necessary to see all cell types individually.
Cheers,
Neven