Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Chloridium is a little-studied group of soil- and wood-inhabiting dematiaceous hyphomycetes that share a rare mode of phialidic conidiogenesis on multiple loci. The genus has historically been divided into three morphological sections, i.e. Chloridium, Gongromeriza, and Psilobotrys. Sexual morphs have been placed in the widely perceived genus Chaetosphaeria, but unlike their asexual counterparts, they show little or no morphological variation. Recent molecular studies have expanded the generic concept to include species defined by a new set of morphological characters, such as the collar-like hyphae, setae, discrete phialides, and penicillately branched conidiophores. The study is based on the consilience of molecular species delimitation methods, phylogenetic analyses, ancestral state reconstruction, morphological hypotheses, and global biogeographic analyses. The multilocus phylogeny demonstrated that the classic concept of Chloridium is polyphyletic, and the original sections are not congeneric. Therefore, we abolish the existing classification and propose to restore the generic status of Gongromeriza and Psilobotrys. We present a new generic concept and define Chloridium as a monophyletic, polythetic genus comprising 37 species distributed in eight sections. In addition, of the taxa earlier referred to Gongromeriza, two have been redisposed to the new genus Gongromerizella. Analysis of published metabarcoding data showed that Chloridium is a common soil fungus representing a significant (0.3 %) proportion of sequence reads in environmental samples deposited in the GlobalFungi database. The analysis also showed that they are typically associated with forest habitats, and their distribution is strongly influenced by climate, which is confirmed by our data on their ability to grow at different temperatures. We demonstrated that Chloridium forms species-specific ranges of distribution, which is rarely documented for microscopic soil fungi. Our study shows the feasibility of using the GlobalFungi database to study the biogeography and ecology of fungi. Taxonomic novelties: New genus: Gongromerizella Réblová; New sections: Chloridium section Cryptogonytrichum Réblová, Hern.-Restr., M. Kolařík & F. Sklenar, Chloridium section Gonytrichopsis Réblová, Hern.-Restr., M. Kolařík & F. Sklenar, Chloridium section Metachloridium Réblová, Hern.-Restr., M. Kolařík & F. Sklenar, Chloridium section Volubilia Réblová, Hern.-Restr., M. Kolařík & F. Sklenar; New species: Chloridium bellum Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium biforme Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium detriticola Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium gamsii Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium guttiferum Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium moratum Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium peruense Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium novae-zelandiae Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium elongatum Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium volubile Réblová & Hern.-Restr.; New varieties: Chloridium bellum var. luteum Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium detriticola var. effusum Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium chloridioides var. convolutum Réblová & Hern.-Restr.; New combinations: Chloridium section Gonytrichum (Nees & T. Nees) Réblová, Hern.-Restr., M. Kolařík & F. Sklenar, Chloridium section Mesobotrys (Sacc.) Réblová, Hern.-Restr., M. Kolařík & F. Sklenar, Chloridium section Pseudophialocephala (M.S. Calabon et al.) Réblová, Hern.-Restr., M. Kolařík & F. Sklenar, Chloridium simile (W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.) Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium chloridioides (W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.) Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium subglobosum (W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.) Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium fuscum (Corda) Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium ypsilosporum (Hol.-Jech.) Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium costaricense (G. Weber et al.) Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium cuneatum (N.G. Liu et al.) Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Fusichloridium cylindrosporum (W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.) Réblová, Gongromeriza myriocarpa (Fr.) Réblová, Gongromeriza pygmaea (P. Karst.) Réblová, Gongromerizella lignicola (F. Mangenot) Réblová, Gongromerizella pachytrachela (W. Gams & Hol.-Jech) Réblová, Gongromerizella pini (Crous & Akulov) Réblová; New name: Chloridium pellucidum Réblová & Hern.-Restr.; Epitypifications (basionyms): Chaetopsis fusca Corda, Gonytrichum caesium var. subglobosum W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.; Lectotypification (basionym): Gonytrichum caesium Nees & T. Nees. Citation: Réblová M, Hernández-Restrepo M, Sklenář F, Nekvindová J, Réblová K, Kolařík M (2022). Consolidation of Chloridium: new classification into eight sections with 37 species and reinstatement of the genera Gongromeriza and Psilobotrys. Studies in Mycology 103: 87-212. doi: 10.3114/sim.2022.103.04.

Free full text 


Logo of simycolStudies in MycologyAbout the JournalInstructions to AuthorsEditorial BoardWebshopSubscribe
Stud Mycol. 2022 Sep; 103: 87–212.
Published online 2022 Dec 14. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2022.103.04
PMCID: PMC10277272
PMID: 37342155

Consolidation of Chloridium: new classification into eight sections with 37 species and reinstatement of the genera Gongromeriza and Psilobotrys

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Abstract

Chloridium is a little-studied group of soil- and wood-inhabiting dematiaceous hyphomycetes that share a rare mode of phialidic conidiogenesis on multiple loci. The genus has historically been divided into three morphological sections, i.e. Chloridium, Gongromeriza, and Psilobotrys. Sexual morphs have been placed in the widely perceived genus Chaetosphaeria, but unlike their asexual counterparts, they show little or no morphological variation. Recent molecular studies have expanded the generic concept to include species defined by a new set of morphological characters, such as the collar-like hyphae, setae, discrete phialides, and penicillately branched conidiophores. The study is based on the consilience of molecular species delimitation methods, phylogenetic analyses, ancestral state reconstruction, morphological hypotheses, and global biogeographic analyses. The multilocus phylogeny demonstrated that the classic concept of Chloridium is polyphyletic, and the original sections are not congeneric. Therefore, we abolish the existing classification and propose to restore the generic status of Gongromeriza and Psilobotrys. We present a new generic concept and define Chloridium as a monophyletic, polythetic genus comprising 37 species distributed in eight sections. In addition, of the taxa earlier referred to Gongromeriza, two have been redisposed to the new genus Gongromerizella. Analysis of published metabarcoding data showed that Chloridium is a common soil fungus representing a significant (0.3 %) proportion of sequence reads in environmental samples deposited in the GlobalFungi database. The analysis also showed that they are typically associated with forest habitats, and their distribution is strongly influenced by climate, which is confirmed by our data on their ability to grow at different temperatures. We demonstrated that Chloridium forms species-specific ranges of distribution, which is rarely documented for microscopic soil fungi. Our study shows the feasibility of using the GlobalFungi database to study the biogeography and ecology of fungi.

Taxonomic novelties: New genus: Gongromerizella Réblová; New sections: Chloridium section Cryptogonytrichum Réblová, Hern.-Restr., M. Kolařík & F. Sklenar, Chloridium section Gonytrichopsis Réblová, Hern.-Restr., M. Kolařík & F. Sklenar, Chloridium section Metachloridium Réblová, Hern.-Restr., M. Kolařík & F. Sklenar, Chloridium section Volubilia Réblová, Hern.-Restr., M. Kolařík & F. Sklenar; New species: Chloridium bellum Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium biforme Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium detriticola Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium gamsii Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium guttiferum Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium moratum Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium peruense Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium novae-zelandiae Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium elongatum Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium volubile Réblová & Hern.-Restr.; New varieties: Chloridium bellum var. luteum Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium detriticola var. effusum Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium chloridioides var. convolutum Réblová & Hern.-Restr.; New combinations: Chloridium section Gonytrichum (Nees & T. Nees) Réblová, Hern.-Restr., M. Kolařík & F. Sklenar, Chloridium section Mesobotrys (Sacc.) Réblová, Hern.-Restr., M. Kolařík & F. Sklenar, Chloridium section Pseudophialocephala (M.S. Calabon et al.) Réblová, Hern.-Restr., M. Kolařík & F. Sklenar, Chloridium simile (W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.) Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium chloridioides (W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.) Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium subglobosum (W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.) Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium fuscum (Corda) Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium ypsilosporum (Hol.-Jech.) Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium costaricense (G. Weber et al.) Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Chloridium cuneatum (N.G. Liu et al.) Réblová & Hern.-Restr., Fusichloridium cylindrosporum (W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.) Réblová, Gongromeriza myriocarpa (Fr.) Réblová, Gongromeriza pygmaea (P. Karst.) Réblová, Gongromerizella lignicola (F. Mangenot) Réblová, Gongromerizella pachytrachela (W. Gams & Hol.-Jech) Réblová, Gongromerizella pini (Crous & Akulov) Réblová; New name: Chloridium pellucidum Réblová & Hern.-Restr.; Epitypifications (basionyms): Chaetopsis fusca Corda, Gonytrichum caesium var. subglobosum W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.; Lectotypification (basionym): Gonytrichum caesium Nees & T. Nees.

Citation: Réblová M, Hernández-Restrepo M, Sklenář F, Nekvindová J, Réblová K, Kolařík M (2022). Consolidation of Chloridium: new classification into eight sections with 37 species and reinstatement of the genera Gongromeriza and Psilobotrys. Studies in Mycology 103: 87–212. 10.3114/sim.2022.103.04

Keywords: Chaetosphaeriaceae, molecular systematics, phialidic conidiogenesis, soil fungi, species delimitation methods, wood-inhabiting fungi, 35 new taxa

INTRODUCTION

Chloridium (Link 1809) is one of the largest genera of the family Chaetosphaeriaceae, comprising 88 species and varieties (MycoBank, www.mycobank.org). It is a cosmopolitan genus of saprotrophic fungi that thrive on decaying plant tissues in terrestrial and freshwater habitats, especially wood buried in moist soil or leaf litter. Many strains have also been isolated from soil. In nature, many species go unnoticed, but colonies of some species are conspicuous due to the conidia that accumulate in coloured heads or cirrhi (Fig. 1). Attempts to classify species of the genus Chloridium have relied on either morphological hypothesis and division into three sections (Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976), or the use of molecular data (Réblová et al. 2016, Wu & Diao 2022). However, the relationships of most species remain unknown and unverified with molecular data.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g001.jpg

Diversity of colonies in the genus Chloridium spp. A, M. Chl. caesium CBS 145483. B. Chl. caudigerum CBS 138691. C. Chl. virescens CBS 138683. D. Chl. bellum CBS 709.73A. E. Chl. guttiferum CBS 126073. F. Chl. detriticola var. effusum ICMP 15144. G. Chl. elongatum. H, J. Chl. chloridioides PRM 796685. I. Chl. chloroconium CBS 149055. K. Chl. volubile CBS 144661. L. Chl. fuscum CBS 145346. N. Chl. humicola CBS 420.73. A–C, H, J–M. From nature. D–G, I, N. In culture. Scale bars: A–F, H–N = 500 μm; G = 20 μm.

Chloridium was introduced for the single species, Chl. viride (Link 1809), to accommodate a wood-inhabiting hyphomycete characterised by pigmented, unbranched, erect, caespitose conidiophores with aseptate, hyaline, globose conidia adhering in a green mass at the tip. The nomenclature and use of the epithet “virescens” for the type species based on Dematium virescens Pers. 1794, which takes precedence over Chl. viride Link 1809, and which have been revealed as conspecific, was designed by Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) and confirmed by Morgan-Jones & Goos (1992). In 1886, Saccardo compiled a list of 17 Chloridium species, including unrelated taxa with hyaline or lightly pigmented conidia and different types of conidiogenesis using Link’s simple generic diagnosis. Shortly after that, von Höhnel (1903) published the genus Cirrhomyces, typified by C. caudiger, for fungi with effuse colonies, dematiaceous fasciculate conidiophores, and hyaline, oblong conidia adhering in white cirrhi. Von Höhnel (1903) noted its similarity to Chloridium and distinguished his new genus by forming multiple conidia. This mode of conidiogenesis has not yet been described in the literature. Von Höhnel eventually transferred Chl. virescens to Cirrhomyces (Lindau 1907). The peculiar phialidic conidiogenesis on multiple loci was first illustrated by van Beyma (1940) in an unknown soil fungus. The characteristic formation of a pair of conidia at the tip of the phialide gave the name to the new genus and species, Bisporomyces chlamydosporum.

In the following years, the taxonomic treatment of Chl. virescens was one of the most debated in Chloridium. Opinions have revolved mainly around whether Chl. virescens and similar C. caudiger and B. chlamydosporum are congeneric, represent separate species of different genera, synonyms, or should rather be considered intraspecific taxa (Mangenot 1952, Meyer 1959). Hughes (1958) studied the type material of Chl. viride and linked phialidic conidiogenesis with the genus Chloridium. In addition, Hughes synonymised Cirrhomyces and Bisporomyces with Chloridium and accepted five species, namely Chl. botryoideum, Chl. caudigerum, Chl. chlamydosporum, Chl. minutum and Chl. virescens. This treatment was followed by other authors (e.g. Tubaki 1963, Barron 1968, Ellis 1971, Matsushima 1975, Sivasithamparam 1975). Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) revised Chloridium, which led to its classification into three sections based on morphology and the re-introduction of two old generic names as infrageneric taxa, i.e. Chloridium, Gongromeriza, and Psilobotrys. These sections were discriminated by characters of the conidiogenous locus (single locus vs multiple loci), the extension of the phialidic conidiogenous cell (percurrent vs sympodial), the presence or absence of chlamydospores, and the variability of sexual characters. The life cycle of several Chloridium spp. was verified in culture, and the associated sexual morphs were assigned to the widely perceived genus Chaetosphaeria (e.g. Booth 1957, Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976, Constantinescu et al. 1995, Réblová & Gams 1999, 2000).

It was only at the beginning of the 21st century that some species of the genus Chloridium were first investigated using molecular data. The hypothesis that the three sections are congeneric was rejected based on sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of the nuclear rRNA cistron and the nuclear large subunit LSU rDNA gene (LSU) of a limited data set (Réblová & Winka 2000). Following studies demonstrated the polyphyletic nature of Chloridium (e.g. Fernández & Huhndorf 2005, Fehrer et al. 2018, Luo et al. 2019, Crous et al. 2020, Hyde et al. 2020, Réblová et al. 2021a, Wu & Diao 2022). Our study focused on Chloridium sensu stricto (s. str.) and related taxa that share the same mode of phialidic conidiogenesis. Historically, the Chloridium section included Chl. virescens and its three varieties as the sole representatives (Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976).

The unique conidiogenesis attracted the attention of mycologists and was studied using Chl. virescens var. chlamydosporum as an example (Tubaki 1963, Barron 1968, Matsushima 1975). The mechanism of conidium formation was clarified by Hammill (1972) using transmission electron microscopy. It was revealed that conidia are formed successively from multiple growing points at the tip of the phialide. They adhere in heads or cylindrical clusters composed of tightly arranged imbricate chains (cirrhi) in some species, which usually form through the head stage. Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) specified the type of conidium formation of Chloridium as intermediate between phialidic and “sympoduloconidiogenous”. This mode of conidiogenesis is unusual among hyphomycetes and occurs predominantly in members of Chaetosphaeriaceae. Swart (1959) observed identical conidiogenesis in Gonytrichum (Nees & Nees 1818), Goos (1969) and Sutton (1973) found a similar mode in Cacumisporium capitulatum (Hughes 1958), and Hughes & Kendrick (1968) reported it in Codinaea septata. This modification is also typical of chloridium-like asexual morphs of Chaetosphaeria acutata and Ch. crustacea (Réblová & Gams 1999). However, the conidiogenous locus in Cacumisporium and Ch. acutata extends percurrently beyond the collarette, forming minute annellations. Conidiogenesis on multiple loci also occurs in several Phialocephala (Kendrick 1961) species unrelated to the core of this genus (Sivasithamparam 1975, Onofri et al. 1994).

The entangled relationship between Chloridium and Gonytrichum was reported by Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) and Barron & Bhatt (1967). The Chloridium conidiophores grow in small clumps or solitary at the edge or within the colonies of G. caesium and G. chlamydosporium. In culture, the repeated transfers lead to the suppression of the gonytrichum-type conidiophores, and only simple chloridium-type conidiophores form. Seifert et al. (2011) listed Chloridium as a synasexual morph of Gonytrichum sensu Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976). Species assigned to Gonytrichum are dematiaceous hyphomycetes with cushion-shaped to effuse colonies composed of conidiophores bearing whorls of discrete phialides in the nodes and aseptate, usually ellipsoidal-oblong to subglobose, hyaline or pale olivaceous conidia adhering in cirrhi and heads. The genus was revised by Hughes (1951), who studied the development of conidiophores and phialides and coined the term “collar-like” hypha. He regarded the conidiophores of Gonytrichum as essentially unbranched with fertile nodes from which grow collar-like hyphae, encircling the main stalk as a collar. Only from them grow phialides in false verticils and lateral setae of several levels. Hughes (1951) proposed Mesobotrys (Saccardo 1877) as a synonym of Gonytrichum, based mainly on the presence of the collar-like hyphae. The conidiophores of Gonytrichum have an arborescent appearance, while those of Mesobotrys point upwards in one direction. However, the difference in the anatomy of conidiophores was not considered significant at the generic level (Hughes 1951). The genus Gonytrichum comprises 17 species and varieties (MycoBank), most of which were studied by Hughes (1951), Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976), Holubová-Jechová (1982) and Sharma & Munjal (1979) resulting in the acceptance of six species and five varieties.

The sexual morphs of Chloridium and Gonytrichum are indistinguishable; they are characterised by fragmenting 1-septate ascospores and were treated as members of genera Chaetosphaeria and Melanopsammella. Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) established Chaetosphaeria vermicularioides as the sexual morph of Chl. virescens by cultivation studies. The sexual morph of G. caesium is Melanopsammella inaequalis (von Höhnel 1919). Although both morphs occurred in the holotype of Eriosphaeria inaequalis (Grove 1886), their relationship was first acknowledged by von Höhnel (1919) and later by Hughes (1951), who published a verified association of both morphs in culture. Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) did not accept Melanopsammella as a separate genus but instead proposed a section in Chaetosphaeria. Réblová et al. (1999) reinstated Melanopsammella to its former generic status and considered it a sexual morph of Chloridium s. str., Gonytrichum, and Chloridium preussii. This concept was followed by other authors (e.g. Réblová & Winka 2000, Fernández & Huhndorf 2005, Fernández et al. 2006, Crous et al. 2012).

Several phylogenetic studies have consistently shown the genera Chloridium and Gonytrichum to be closely related within a well-supported monophyletic clade (e.g. Réblová & Winka 2000, Fernández et al. 2006, Wei et al. 2018, Lin et al. 2019). Réblová et al. (2016) proposed an amalgamation of Gonytrichum, Melanopsammella, and Chloridium. Wu & Diao (2022) significantly narrowed the concept of Chloridium based on ITS and LSU rDNA sequences. Based on their phylogenetic analysis, Chloridium was considered paraphyletic due to a nested clade containing the genera Adautomilanezia and Sporoschisma.

A new conidiophore morphotype has been “silently smuggled” into Chloridium when Chl. terricola (Wang et al. 2017) and Chl. aquaticum (Wei et al. 2018) with penicillately branched conidiophores were assigned to the genus. Consequently, a new soil species, Chl. paucisetosum (Wei et al. 2022), with a condensed branching system, was also proposed in Chloridium. Based on the BLAST searches of ITS and LSU sequences, Wei et al. (2022) found that Chl. paucisetosum is related to Phialocephala humicola (Jong & Davis 1972) and transferred the latter species to Chloridium.

Fungi with a compact conidiogenous apparatus and phialidic conidiogenesis on multiple loci are rare among dematiaceous hyphomycetes. Four species isolated from soil or plant roots, remarkably similar to the three Chloridium species above, have been placed in the genus Leptographium as L. costaricense (Weber et al. 1996) and Phialocephala as P. gabalongii (Sivasithamparam 1975), P. humicola and P. xalapensis (Maggi & Persiani 1984). Kendrick (1961) described the genus Phialocephala for a group of dematiaceous phialidic hyphomycetes originally placed in Leptographium and distinguished based on the mode of conidiogenesis. While in Phialocephala, the conidiogenous locus thickens gradually, conidia form successively, and the phialides may percurrently extend, in Leptographium, the conidiogenous locus extends percurrently after each conidium and develops minute annellations (Wingfield et al. 1987). The two genera also differ in their habitat and tolerance to the antibiotic cycloheximide (e.g. Kendrick 1963, Jong & Davis 1972, Wang & Wilcox 1985, Harrington 1988, Currah et al. 1993, Jacobs & Wingfield 2001, Tanney et al. 2016).

Particular interest was paid to the conidiogenous loci of L. costaricense and three species of the genus Phialocephala. Sivasithamparam (1975) reported a remarkably similar conidiogenesis in P. gabalongii and Chl. virescens var. caudigerum. The conidiogenesis of P. humicola was studied by Onofri et al. (1994) using scanning electron and interference contrast microscopy. They found that the same pattern that Hammill (1972) discovered in Chl. virescens var. chlamydosporum also occurs in this Phialocephala species. The formation of conidia on multiple loci, where conidia remain attached around the apex of the phialide, has been termed the “conidial crown” (Onofri et al. 1994), and is an aspect that is regularly observed in Chloridium s. str. Weber et al. (1996) examined the conidiogenesis of L. costaricense using scanning electron microscopy. They concluded that the conidial production is both annellidic and sympodial, and the conidiogenous locus extends beyond the collarette.

In the early stages of this study in 2003, preliminary phylogenetic analysis of ITS and LSU rDNA loci revealed that the ex-type and non-type strains of L. costaricense (CBS 409.94), P. humicola (CBS 420.73, DAOM 226654) and P. xalapensis (CBS 218.86) are closely related and form a monophyletic clade with Chl. virescens (Réblová & Seifert, unpubl.). Grünig et al. (2002) and Jacobs et al. (2003) showed that P. humicola CBS 420.73 and P. xalapensis CBS 218.86 are nested in Sordariomycetes and distantly related to the core of Phialocephala in Leotiomycetes. Based on ITS BLAST search, Tanney et al. (2016) suggested that P. humicola is a member of Chaetosphaeriaceae. Manawasinghe et al. (2022) introduced the genus Pseudophialocephala for a group of Chloridium species with penicillately branched conidiophores and transferred P. humicola and P. xalapensis to it. Pseudophialocephala comprises six species with identical or nearly identical ITS and LSU rDNA sequences and minor differences in morphology.

This study aims to expand our knowledge and conceptual understanding of Chloridium and allied taxa using a polyphasic approach. We based our analysis on a large set of 119 ex-type and non-type strains of known species of Chloridium, Gonytrichum, Pseudophialocephala, and their synonyms and other related but unidentified isolates. We focused on the characterisation of the generic concept of Chloridium, infrageneric classification, and inter- and intraspecific variability based on the consilience of molecular methods, morphological hypotheses, and global biogeographic analysis. To this end, we sequenced four DNA loci: nuc rDNA ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 (ITS barcode), D1−D3 domains of nucLSU rDNA (approximately 5′ 1 800 base pairs), the intermediate section of the coding region of translation elongation factor 1-α (tef1-α) and β-tubulin (tub2) genes, and performed partitioned Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian inference phylogenetic analyses. We conducted molecular species delimitation methods and barcode gap to reveal species boundaries and interspecific variability. Based on the comparative morphological studies on the natural substrate and in culture and performance evaluation of sequenced loci, we recommend morphological traits and primary and secondary DNA barcode markers to identify species of Chloridium. We conducted an in-depth analysis of the RNA structural data of the ITS1 and ITS2 regions to predict their 2D models and visualise base changes in the canonical pairs of recovered duplexes. These changes can be used as an additional set of diagnostic features and have been shown to help delimit biological species (Coleman 2009, Coleman & Vacquier 2002, Müller et al. 2007). We also performed reconstruction of ancestral climate zones and ancestral states of morphological characters to shed light on the infrageneric classification of Chloridium. The ITS data were analysed using the GlobalFungi database (Větrovský et al. 2020), which provided baseline geographic data for estimating the global distribution of Chloridium and related fungi at the species level.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sampling and fungal strains

Field collections of colonies and ascomata on decomposing plant material and soil samples were made in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres in the temperate broadleaf and mixed forests of several Palearctic ecoregions: European Atlantic mixed forests, Western European broadleaf forests and Pyrenees conifer and mixed forests (Czech Republic, France, and the Netherlands), and Westland and Fiordland temperate forests (New Zealand).

Fungarium specimens were accessioned into the Fungarium of the Institute of Botany CAS in Průhonice, Czech Republic (PRA) and New Zealand Fungarium in Auckland, New Zealand (PDD). Cultures were deposited in Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute in Utrecht, the Netherlands (CBS), Facultat de Medicina de Reus in Tarragona, Spain (FMR), International Collection of Microorganisms from Plants in Auckland, New Zealand (ICMP) and CABI-IMI Culture Collection in Egham, UK (IMI). Other fungarium materials and cultures were obtained from CBS, Canadian National Mycological Fungarium in Ottawa, Canada (DAOM), Farlow Fungarium in Cambridge, USA (FH), ICMP, IMI, Illinois Natural History Survey Fungarium in Champaign, Illinois, USA (ILLS), Royal Botanical Gardens in Kew, UK (K), BCCM/MUCL Agro-food & Environmental Fungal Collection in Louvain, Belgium (MUCL), Fungarium of the National Museum in Prague, Czech Republic (PRM) and Texas Therapeutics Institute in Houston, Texas, USA (TTI). Studied strains, their sources, and GenBank accession numbers of sequences generated in this study are listed in Table 1. Fungal novelties were registered in MycoBank.

Table 1.

Taxa, isolate information and new sequences of Chloridium and related taxa determined for this study (in bold) and additional sequences retrieved from GenBank.

Taxon Strain1,2 Country Host Substrate GenBank accession numbers3
ITS LSU tef1-α tub2
Chaetosphaeria innumera CBS 145639Czech Republic Acer pseudoplatanus decaying wood OP455358 OP455464 OP465036
M.R. 3736Czech Republic Fagus sylvatica decaying wood OP455359 OP455465 OP465037
Chloridium bellum var. bellumCBS 709.73A TGermanywheat fieldsoil OP455360 OP455466 OP464934 OP465038
CBS 709.73BGermanywheat fieldsoil OP455361 OP455467 OP464935 OP465039
CBS 127310USAn/asoilMH864519a OP455468 OP464933 OP465040
Chloridium bellum var. luteumCBS 141.54 TDemocratic Republic of the Congon/asoil OP455362 OP455469 OP464936 OP465041
Chloridium biforme ICMP 23429 TNew ZealandNothofagus sp.decaying wood OP455363 OP455470 OP464937 OP465042
Chloridium caesium CBS 230.74Netherlands Acer pseudoplatanus decaying wood OP455364 OP455471 OP464938 OP465043
CBS 102339Austria Salix cinerea decaying wood OP455365 OP455472 OP464939 OP465044
CBS 145483Czech Republic Quercus robur decaying wood OP455366 OP455473 OP464940 OP465045
CBS 145633Czech Republic Tilia cordata decaying wood OP455367 OP455474 OP464941 OP465046
Chloridium caudigerum CBS 248.75France Cedrus atlantica decaying wood OP455368 OP455475 OP464942 OP465047
CBS 263.76BNetherlandsunidentifieddecaying wood OP455369 OP455476 OP464943 OP465048
CBS 421.76Czech Republic Populus nigra decaying wood OP455370 OP455477 OP465049
CBS 601.75ABelgiumunidentifieddecaying wood OP455371 OP455478 OP464944 OP465050
CBS 621.75Belgiumunidentifieddecaying wood OP455372 OP455479 OP464945 OP465051
CBS 675.74France Carya alba decaying wood OP455373 OP455480 OP464946 OP465052
CBS 138691Czech Republic Fagus sylvatica decaying wood OP455374 OP455481 OP464947 OP465053
CBS 145430Czech Republic Carpinus betulus decaying wood OP455375 OP455482 OP464948 OP465054
CBS 145432Czech Republic Quercus cerris decaying wood OP455376 OP455483 OP464949 OP465055
CBS 145433Czech Republic Quercus cerris decaying wood OP455377 OP455484 OP464950 OP465056
CBS 145488Czech Republic Acer pseudoplatanus decaying wood OP455378 OP455485 OP464951 OP465057
CBS 145489Czech Republic Acer pseudoplatanus decaying wood OP455379 OP455486 OP464952 OP465058
CBS 145490Czech Republic Fagus sylvatica decaying wood OP455380 OP455487 OP464953 OP465059
CBS 146196Czech Republic Quercus cerris decaying wood OP455381 OP455488 OP464954 OP465060
FMR 11338Spainunidentifieddecaying wood OP455382 OP455489 OP464955 OP465061
FMR 12411Spainn/asoil OP455383 OP455490 OP464956 OP465062
ICMP 22547New ZealandNothofagus sp.decaying wood OP455384 OP455491 OP464957 OP465063
Chloridium chlamydosporum CBS 114.41 TNetherlandsn/asoil OP455385 OP455492 OP464958 OP465064
CBS 239.75CFrancen/aforest soil OP455386 OP455493 OP464959 OP465065
CBS 423.76Czech Republic Betula pendula decaying wood OP455387 OP455494 OP464960 OP465066
CBS 916.73Chilen/avolcanic ash soil OP455388 OP455495 OP464961 OP465067
CBS 149052Netherlandsn/asoil OP455389 OP455496 OP464962 OP465068
CBS 149053Netherlandsn/asoil OP455390 OP455497 OP464963 OP465069
CBS 149054Netherlandsn/asoil OP455391 OP455498 OP464964 OP465070
ICMP 15193New Zealandunidentifieddecaying wood OP455392 OP455499 OP464965 OP465071
Chloridium chloridioides var. chloridioidesCBS 129.72Netherlandsn/ahumus layer of forest soil OP455393 OP455500 OP464966 OP465072
CBS 239.75AUnited Kingdom Pteridium aquilinum decomposing petiole on slate soil OP455394 OP455501 OP464967 OP465073
CBS 132488Spainunidentifieddecaying stemKY853435bKY853495b OP464968 OP465074
Chloridium chloridioides var. convolutumCBS 145504 TCzech Republic Picea abies decaying wood OP455395 OP455502 OP464969 OP465075
CBS 145636Czech Republic Fagus sylvatica decaying wood OP455396 OP455503 OP464970 OP465076
CBS 145638Czech Republic Acer pseudoplatanus decaying wood OP455397 OP455504 OP464971 OP465077
Chloridium chloroconium CBS 149055Netherlandsn/asoil OP455398 OP455505 OP464972 OP465078
Chloridium costaricense CBS 409.94 TCosta Rica Magnolia sambuensis soil, rhizosphere OP455399 OP455506 OP464973 OP465079
Chloridium detriticola var. detriticolaCBS 345.67 TGermanyunidentifieddecaying woodMH858992aMH870689a OP464974 OP465080
CBS 581.73Swedenunidentifiedunknown OP455400 OP455507 OP464975 OP465081
M.R. 3774Czech Republic Fagus sylvatica decaying wood OP455401 OP455508 OP464976
Chloridium detriticola var. effusumICMP 15144 TNew Zealandunidentifieddecaying wood OP455402 OP455509 OP464977 OP465082
Chloridium elongatum CBS 147816 TNetherlandsn/asoil OP455403 OP455510 OP464978 OP465083
Chloridium fuscum CBS 169.27 TaUSAn/asoil OP455404 OP455511 OP464979 OP465084
CBS 195.60South Africaunidentifiedunknown OP455405 OP455512 OP464980 OP465085
CBS 201.55Canadan/asoil OP455406 OP455513 OP464981 OP465086
CBS 875.68Germanyn/awheat field soil OP455407 OP455514 OP464982 OP465087
CBS 145346 ETCzech RepublicQuercus sp.decaying wood OP455408 OP455515 OP464983 OP465088
CBS 148324Puerto Ricounidentifieddecaying wood OP455409 OP455516 OP464984 OP465089
CBS 148531USAunidentifieddecaying wood OP455410 OP455517 OP464985 OP465090
IMI 188377United Kingdomunidentifiedunknown OP455411 OP455518 OP464986 OP465091
IMI 338329AustraliaEucalyptus sp.composted bark OP455412 OP455519 OP464987 OP465092
MUCL 4158Canadaunidentifieddecaying wood OP455413 OP455520 OP464988 OP465093
TTI-0889USAn/asoil OP455414 OP455521 OP464989 OP465094
Chloridium gamsii CBS 667.75 TBelgiumunidentifieddecaying wood OP455415 OP455522 OP464990 OP465095
Chloridium guttiferum CBS 126073 TPerun/asoilMH864068aMH875524a OP464991 OP465096
Chloridium humicola CBS 218.86Indiaunidentifieddecaying wood OP455416 OP455523 OP464992 OP465097
CBS 420.73 TUSAn/asoil OP455417 OP455524 OP464993 OP465098
CBS 113449Canada Glycine max stem below soil line OP455418 OP455525
Chloridium mirabile CBS 408.76 TCzech Republic Fraxinus excelsior decaying wood OP455420 OP455526 OP464994 OP465099
CBS 149309Netherlandsn/asoil OP455419 OP455527 OP464995 OP465100
Chloridium moratum CBS 127627 TUSAn/asoil OP455421 OP455528 OP464996 OP465101
FMR 11343Spainunidentifieddecaying wood OP455422 OP455529 OP464997 OP465102
Chloridium novae-zelandiae ICMP 22736 TNew Zealandunidentifieddecaying bark OP455423 OP455530 OP464998 OP465103
Chloridium peruense CBS 126074 TPerun/asoil OP455424 OP455531 OP464999 OP465104
Chloridium subglobosum CBS 134152Italyunidentifieddecaying wood OP455425 OP455532 OP465000 OP465105
CBS 696.74 ETCzech Republic Carpinus betulus decaying wood OP455426 OP455533 OP465001 OP465106
Chloridium setosum CBS 263.76ASri Lankaunidentifieddecaying wood OP455427 OP455534 OP465002 OP465107
Chloridium virescens CBS 424.76Belgium Quercus robur decaying wood OP455428 OP455535 OP465003 OP465108
CBS 601.75BBelgiumunidentifieddecaying wood OP455429 OP455536 OP465004 OP465109
CBS 676.74Netherlandsangiospermdecaying wood OP455430 OP455537 OP465005 OP465110
CBS 102341Czech Republicunidentifieddecaying woodAF178542c OP455538 OP465006 OP465111
CBS 138683Franceunidentifieddecaying wood OP455431 OP455539
CBS 144660Czech RepublicAcer sp.decaying wood OP455432 OP455540 OP465007 OP465112
CBS 144663Czech Republicunidentifieddecaying wood OP455433 OP455541 OP465008 OP465113
CBS 145345Czech RepublicQuercus sp.decaying wood OP455434 OP455542 OP465009 OP465114
CBS 145347Czech Republic Alnus incana decaying wood OP455435 OP455543 OP465010 OP465115
CBS 145348Czech RepublicQuercus sp.decaying wood OP455436 OP455544 OP465011 OP465116
CBS 145479Czech RepublicQuercus sp.decaying wood OP455437 OP455545 OP465012 OP465117
CBS 145480Czech RepublicQuercus sp.decaying wood OP455438 OP455546 OP465013 OP465118
CBS 145481Czech RepublicQuercus sp.decaying wood OP455439 OP455547 OP465014 OP465119
CBS 145482Czech Republic Alnus incana decaying wood OP455440 OP455548 OP465015 OP465120
CBS 145487Czech Republic Fagus sylvatica decaying wood OP455441 OP455549 OP465016 OP465121
CBS 149051Netherlandsn/asoil OP455442 OP455550 OP465017 OP465122
M.R. 3588Czech RepublicQuercus sp.decaying wood OP455443 OP455551
M.R. 3599Czech RepublicQuercus sp.decaying wood OP455444 OP455552
M.R. 3803Franceunidentifieddecaying wood OP455445 OP455553
Chloridium volubile CBS 144661 TCzech Republic Picea abies decaying wood OP455446 OP455554 OP465018 OP465123
ICMP 22553New ZealandNothofagus sp.decaying bark OP455447 OP455555 OP465019 OP465124
ICMP 22554New Zealandunidentifieddecaying wood OP455448 OP455556 OP465020 OP465125
ICMP 22555New Zealandunidentifieddecaying wood OP455449 OP455557 OP465021 OP465126
ICMP 22556New ZealandNothofagus sp.decaying wood OP455450 OP455558 OP465022 OP465127
ICMP 22557New ZealandNothofagus sp.decaying wood OP455451 OP455559 OP465023 OP465128
Chloridium ypsilosporum CBS 121859Panamaunidentifiedleaf litter OP455452 OP455560 OP465024 OP465129
Chloridium sp.CBS 148972Netherlandsn/asoil OP455453 OP455561 OP465025 OP465130
CBS 148973Netherlandsn/asoil OP455454 OP455562 OP465026 OP465131
CBS 149050Netherlandsn/asoil OP455455 OP455563 OP465027 OP465132
Gongromeriza myriocarpa CBS 141.53 TbFrance Fagus sylvatica decaying wood OP455456 OP455564 OP465029
CBS 264.76 NTNetherlandsunidentifieddecaying wood OP455457 OP455565 OP465028
Gongromeriza pygmaea CBS 144786Czech Republic Fagus sylvatica decaying wood OP455458 OP455566 OP465030
CBS 699.74 TcNetherlands Fraxinus excelsior decaying wood OP455459 OP455567 OP465031
Gongromerizella lignicola CBS 143.54 TFrance Fagus sylvatica decaying wood OP455460 OP455568 OP465032
Gongromerizella pachytrachela CBS 645.75 TBelgiumunidentifieddecaying wood OP455461 OP455569 OP465033
Psilobotrys minutus CBS 223.74Netherlands Acer pseudoplatanus decaying wood OP455462 OP455570 OP465034
CBS 247.75Germany Fraxinus excelsior decaying wood OP455463 OP455571 OP465035

1 T, ET, IT, NT denote ex-type, ex-epitype, ex-isotype and ex-neotype strains.

2 a ex-type of Mesobotrys simplex; b ex-type of Catenularia heimii; c ex-type of Phialophora phaeophora.

Cultures derived from ascospores were prepared by cutting the ascomata with a sterile razor blade, using a drop of sterile water, which allowed the centre containing the asci and ascospores to swell. The gelatinous centre was transferred onto the agar with the tip of a sterile needle. Cultures derived from conidia were made by moving conidial clusters onto the agar surface with the tip of a needle. Ascospores and conidia were transferred to a 10 cm Petri dish containing water agar (WA) (distilled water 1 L, agar 10 g, Oxoid Limited, Hampshire, United Kingdom) or Modified Leonian’s agar (MLA) (Malloch 1981) and incubated for 2–5 d. Single and multiple ascospores and conidia were obtained with a single-spore isolator (Meopta, Přerov, Czech Republic); germinating spores were transferred to a new 6 cm Petri dish containing MLA. Cultures were incubated in the dark at 20–25 °C and observed periodically for sporulation.

Soil isolates were analysed as described in Groenewald et al. (2018). The soil was taken from the top 15 cm, avoiding stones and organic materials as much as possible, and collected into sterile 20 mL plastic tubes. The soil samples were kept at 4 °C until further analyses. From each soil sample, 1 g of soil was subjected to serial dilutions as described in Domsch et al. (2007). Dilutions were plated onto solid 2 % (w/v) malt extract agar (MEA) (Oxoid, Landsmeer, the Netherlands), supplemented with 50 ppm penicillin-G (Sigma-Aldrich, Zwijndrecht, the Netherlands) and streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, Zwijndrecht, the Netherlands) and incubated at room temperature (19–21 °C) in the dark for 3–7 d. Single colonies were isolated on MEA and transferred to 10 % water-glycerol solution in cryotubes for temporary preservation before storage (temperatures ranging from −20 °C to −80 °C) in the CBS collection.

Morphological studies

Morphological observations were made on herbarium specimens and living cultures. Colonies and ascomata were examined with an Olympus SZX12 dissecting microscope (Olympus America, Inc., Melville, NY, USA) and rehydrated with tap water. Microscopic preparations were mounted in 90 % lactic acid, tap water, or Melzer’s reagent; measurements were made from material mounted in Melzer’s reagent, and means ± standard deviation (SD) based on a minimum of 20–25 measurements were calculated for sizes of asci, ascospores, and conidia. Observations were made using an Olympus BX51 light microscope. Microphotographs were captured using an Olympus DP70 camera with Imaging Software Cell^D (Olympus). Colony macrophotographs were documented with a Canon EOS 77D digital camera with Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM objective (Canon Europe Ltd., Middlesex, UK) with daylight spectrum 5500K 16W LED lights. Images were processed with Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA).

We used slide cultures to observe the ontogeny of chlamydospores, arrangement of conidiophores, conidiogenesis, and early conidial cluster formation. Each strain was inoculated on several small blocks of potato-carrot agar (PCA) (Crous et al. 2019), a nutrient-deficient agar medium, covered with a coverslip, incubated in the dark at 20–23 °C and checked daily for two weeks. Fungi were cultured on several different nutrient media to obtain colony characters and information on diffusible pigments and growth: cornmeal dextrose agar (CMD) (Oxoid Limited; 2 % dextrose), MLA, oatmeal agar (OA) and PCA. Characteristics of colonies were based on 4-wk-old cultures incubated in the dark at 20–23 °C. Strains were also inoculated on cornmeal agar (CMA) with sterile stems of Urtica dioica and synthetic nutrient agar (SNA) with pine (Pinus sylvestris) needles and banana (Musa sp.) leaves (Crous et al. 2019) to induce sporulation.

The effect of temperature on mycelial growth was studied on 31 strains that represent 22 accepted species and six varieties. The strains were pre-grown on malt extract agar (MEA, malt extract 20 g, peptone 1 g, glucose 20 g, agar 20 g, distilled water 1 L, pH 6) for 14 d at 24 °C. An agar disk (5 mm diam) was then excised from the growing front of the fungus and used as an inoculum. Growth rates were measured in triplicate at seven different temperatures ranging from 5–37 °C after 14 d of cultivation at 24 °C in the dark.

Gene markers, DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing

We analysed sequences of four gene markers. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) (ITS) of the nuclear rRNA cistron is the primary barcode for fungi (Schoch et al. 2012). The nuclear large subunit LSU rDNA gene (LSU) (D1−D3 domains, approximately 5′ 1 800 base pairs) is the most commonly used marker in Chaetosphaeriaceae. It has also been used to explore relationships in the Ascomycota, providing good phylogenetic resolution at the generic and higher taxonomic levels in fungi (e.g. Zhang et al. 2007, Schoch et al. 2009). Two coding markers, i.e. the intermediate section of the coding region of the translation elongation factor 1-α (tef1-α) and β-tubulin (tub2) marked by exons 2−6, were selected. They are known for their ability to distinguish between interspecific relationships (Robert et al. 2011, Stielow et al. 2015, Meyer et al. 2019) and were successfully applied as dual barcodes in Chaetosphaeriaceae in genera Codinaea, Dictyochaeta, and Zanclospora (Réblová et al. 2021ac). Accession numbers of sequences retrieved from GenBank and published in other studies (Réblová & Winka 2000, Huhdorf & Fernández 2005, Fernández et al. 2006, Somrithipol et al. 2008, Prabhugaonkar & Bhat 2009, Magyar et al. 2011, Crous et al. 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2020, Hashimoto et al. 2015, Ma et al. 2016, Hernández-Restrepo et al. 2017, Wang et al. 2017, Wei et al. 2018, 2022 Yang et al. 2018, Lin et al. 2019, Luo et al. 2019, Vu et al. 2019, Li et al. 2021, Réblová et al. 2021ae, Manawasinghe et al. 2022, Wu & Diao 2022) are listed in Table 2.

Table 2.

Taxa, isolate information and sequences retrieved from GenBank.

Taxon Strain1,2 Country Host Substrate GenBank accession numbers
ITS LSU tef1-α
Adautomilanezia caesalpiniae CC-LAMIC 102/12 TBrazil Caesalpina echinata woodKX821777KU170671
Achrochaeta talbotii ICMP 15161New Zealandunknowndecaying woodMT454480MT454495OL653988
Anacacumisporium appendiculatum HMAS 245593 TChinabroad-leaved treedead stemsKP347129KT001553
Arcuatospora novae-zelandiae CBS 109474VenezuelaNectandra sp.decaying leafMW984569MW984552OL653989
Arcuatospora seorsa CBS 147510 TThailandbroad leaf treedecaying leafMW984572MW984555OL653990
Brunneodinemasporium brasiliense CBS 112007 TBrazilunidentifieddecaying leafJQ889272JQ889288
Brunneodinemasporium jonesii GZCC 16-0050 TChinaunidentifieddecaying woodKY026058KY026055
Cacumisporium capitulatum FMR 11339Spainunidentifieddecaying woodHF677176HF677190
Calvolachnella guaviyunis CBS 134695 TUruguay Myrcianthes pungens barkKJ834524KJ834525
Catenularia catenulata DLUCC 0891 TChinaunidentifiedsubmerged woodMK828637MK835838
Catenularia minor PRM 900544 TaThailandunidentifiedbamboo culmMW987827MW987822OL653993
Chaetosphaeria hebetiseta CBS 102340 TUkraine Fagus sylvatica decaying woodAF178549AF178549OL653994
Chaetosphaeria lignomollis S.M.H. 3015 TPuerto Ricounidentifieddecaying woodEU037896AF466073
Chalarodes obpyramidata PDD 119364New ZealandNothofagus sp.decaying woodMW987828MW987823OL653995
Chloridium aquaticum MFLUCC 11-0212 TThailandunidentifiedsubmerged woodMH476570MH476567
Chloridium chloroconium MFLUCC 16-1344 TbChinaunidentifiedsubmerged woodMN860551MN860556
Chloridium costaricense CGMCC3-19620 TcChinan/asoilMK372070MK372068
HGUP4509Chinan/asoilKT893301KM434143
HGUP4519 TdChinan/asoilKT893302KM434144
HGUP4521Chinan/asoilKT893303KM434145
HGUP4536Chinan/asoilKT893304KM434146
NBRC 100578Japanunidentifieddecaying woodAB671503AB671470
Chloridium crousii CGMCC 3.20701 TChinaunidentifieddead branchOL627543OL655003
Chloridium culmicola CGMCC 3.20639 TChinabamboodecaying culmOL627650OL655054
Chloridium cuneatum GZCC 20-0005 TThailandunidentifieddecaying woodMN999924MN901120
Chloridium cylindrosporellum CGMCC 3.20719 TChinabamboorotten leafOL627899
Chloridium fuscum DLUCC 0574Chinaunidentifiedsubmerged woodMK828620MK835820MN194073
MFLUCC 11-0216 TeThailandunidentifiedsubmerged woodMH476571MH476568
MFLUCC 16-1095Chinaunidentifiedsubmerged woodMK828622MK835822MN194075
MFLUCC 16-1111Chinaunidentifiedsubmerged woodMK828621MK835821MN194074
Chloridium humicola CBS 601.66Germanyn/aself-heating hayMH858896MH870560
MFLUCC 21-0219ThailandSpartina sp.submerged leafOL504778OL477391
NBRC 31686Japann/asoilAB671502AB671469
Chloridium jilinense CGMCC 3.20640 TChinaunidentifieddecaying woodOL627659OL655058
Chloridium kirkii CGMCC 3.20703 TChinaunidentifieddecaying woodOL627588OL655020
Chloridium proliferatum CGMCC 3.20766 TChina Entada phaseoloides decaying fruitOL628678
Chloridium setosum CGMCC 3.20741 TChinaPinus sp.rotten coneOL628345
Chloridium shangsiense CGMCC 3.20632 TChinaunidentifieddead branchOL627574OL655016
Chloridium sinense CGMCC 3.20743 TChina Leguminosae rotten seedOL628375
Chloridium tropicale CGMCC 3.20725 TChinaunidentifiedleaf litterOL628018OL655153
Chloridium xishuangbannaense CGMCC 3.20723 TChinaunidentifiedleaf litterOL628006OL655149
Chloridium virescens CBS 152.53FranceAcer sp.unknownMH857142MH868678
M.R. 1148Czech Republic Carpinus betulus decaying woodAF178550AF178550
Codinaea assamica CBS 139907 TfMalaysia Acacia mangium leaf spotOL654077OL654134OL653997
Codinaea fertilis IMI 233824New ZealandBetula sp.rootOL654080OL654137OL654000
Codinaea paniculata CBS 145098 TFrancedeciduous treesubmerged woodMT118230MT118201OL654002
Codinaeella lambertiae CBS 143419 TAustralia Lambertia formosa leavesOL654084OL654141OL654009
Codinaeella minuta CBS 298.61 TJapan Lithocarpus edulis dead leavesOL654090OL654147OL654016
Codinaeella parvilobata CBS 144536 TCzech Republic Fagus sylvatica decaying cupuleOL654100OL654157OL654027
Conicomyces pseudotransvaalensis HHUF 29956 TJapan Machilus japonica dead twigLC001710LC001708
Cryptophiale udagawae GZCC 18-0047Chinaunidentifieddecaying woodMN104608MN104619
Cryptophialoidea fasciculata MFLU 18-1499Thailandunknownsubmerged woodMH758195MH758208
Dendrophoma cytisporoides CBS 144107Germany Buxus sempervivens decaying barkMT118234MT118205OL654032
Dictyochaeta fuegiana ICMP 15153 TNew Zealandunidentifieddecaying woodMT454487EF063574MT454677
Dictyochaeta querna CBS 145503Czech Republic Quercus cerris acornMT454489MT454503MT454679
Dinemasporium cruciferum HHUF 30001Japan Arundo donax unknownAB900895AB934039AB934089
Dinemasporium pseudoindicum CBS 127402 TUSAtallgrass prairiesoilJQ889277JQ889293
Ellisembia aurea CBS 144403 TFrance Sambucus nigra decaying woodMH836375MH836376
Ellisembia folliculata CBS 147152Czech Republic Carpinus betulus decaying woodOL654105OL654162OL654033
Eucalyptostroma eucalypti CBS 142074 TMalaysia Eucalyptus pellita leaf spotsKY173408KY173500
Exserticlava vasiformis TAMA 450Japanunidentifiedplant debrisAB753846
Flectospora laminata CBS 112964 TThailandunidentifieddecaying woodMW984576MW984558OL654034
Fuscocatenula submersa MFLUCC 18-1342 TChinaunidentifiedsubmerged woodMK828634MK835835MN194085
Fusichloridium cylindrosporum CBS 101429Czech Republic Abies alba decaying barkAF178554AF178554
Gongromerizella pini CBS 146011 TUkraine Pinus sylvestris decaying woodMT223787MT223882
Infundibulomyces cupulatus BCC 11929 TThailandLagerstroemia sp.dead leafEF113976EF113979
Infundibulomyces oblongisporus BCC 13400 TThailandunidentified angiospermleaf litterEF113977EF113980
Kionochaeta microspora GZCC 18-0036 TChinaunidentifieddecaying woodMN104607MN104618
Kionochaeta ramifera MUCL 39164Cubaunidentifieddecaying leafMW144421MW144404OL654036
Menispora caesia CBS 145022Czech Republic Carpinus betulus decaying woodOL654107OL654164OL654039
Menispora ciliata c CBS 122131 TCzech Republic Acer campestre decaying woodEU488736OL654165OL654040
Menispora tortuosa CBS 117553CanadaAcer sp.decaying barkOL654111OL654169OL654044
Menisporopsis pirozynskii MUCL 47217Democratic Republic of the Congounidentifieddecaying leafMW984579MW984561OL654047
Menisporopsis theobromae MUCL 41079Venezuelaunidentifieddecaying leafMW984580MW984562OL654048
Multiguttulispora dimorpha CBS 140002MalaysiaEucalyptus sp.twigMW984582MW984564OL654049
Multiguttulispora triseptata IMI 353690CubaunidentifiedleafMW984584MW984566OL654050
Nawawia filiformis MFLUCC 17-2394Thailandunidentifieddecaying woodMH758196MH758209
Neopseudolachnella acutispora MAFF 244358 TJapan Pleioblastus chino dead twigsAB934065AB934041AB934091
Neopseudolachnella magnispora MAFF 244359 TJapan Sasa kurilensis dead twigsAB934066AB934042AB934092
Nimesporella capillacea IMI 358908 TCote d’Ivoireunidentifiedleaf litterOL654114OL654171OL654051
Paliphora intermedia CBS 896.97 ITAustraliaunidentifiedleaf litterMH862682EF204501
Paragaeumannomyces panamensis S.M.H. 3596 TPanamaunidentifieddecaying woodAY906948MT118218
Paragaeumannomyces rubicundus S.M.H. 3221 TCosta Ricaunidentifieddecaying woodMT118242MT118224
Phaeostalagmus cyclosporus CBS 663.70The NetherlandsQuercus sp.decaying barkMH859892MH871680
Phialogeniculata guadalcanalensis MFLUCC 18-0260 TThailandunidentifieddecaying woodMK828625MK835825MN194078
Phialosporostilbe scutiformis MFLUCC 17-0227 TChinaunidentifiedsubmerged woodMH758194MH758207
Phialoturbella calva ICMP 23826 TNew Zealandunidentifieddecaying barkMW984585MW984567OL654052
Phialoturbella lunata MFLUCC 18-0642 TChinaunidentifiedsubmerged woodMK828624MK835824MN194077
Polynema podocarpi CBS 144415 TNew Zealand Podocarpus totara unknownMH327797MH327833
Pseudodinemasporium fabiforme CBS 140010Malaysia Acacia mangium leaf spotsKR611889KR611906
Pseudolachnea fraxini CBS 113701 TSweden Fraxinus excelsior unknownJQ889287JQ889301AB934096
Pseudolachnea hispidula MAFF 244365Japan Morus bombycis dead twigAB934072AB934048AB934098
Pseudolachnella asymmetrica MAFF 244366 TJapanPhyllostachys nigra var. henonisdead twigAB934073AB934049AB934099
Pseudolachnella scolecospora MAFF 244379JapanSasa sp.dead twigsAB934086AB934062AB934112
Pyrigemmula aurantiaca CBS 126743 THungary Vitis vinifera barkHM241692HM241692
Rattania setulifera GUFCC 15501 TIndia Calamus thwaitesii leavesGU191794HM171322
Sporoschisma hemipsilum MUCL 56487MartiniqueunidentifiedwoodMW987829MW987824
Sporoschisma mirabile CBS 144794France Alnus glutinosa submerged woodMW987830MW987825
Stilbochaeta malaysiana IMI 312436 TMalaysiaunidentifieddecaying leafOL654121OL654178OL654059
Stilbochaeta novae-guineensis CBS 147515Puerto Ricounidentifieddecaying woodOL654122OL654179OL654060
Stilbochaeta ramulosetula IMI 313452 ETMalaysiaunidentifiedsubmerged leafOL654124OL654181OL654062
Striatosphaeria castanea CBS 145352 TFrench Guineawoody lianadecaying peridermMT118244MT118229
Striatosphaeria codinaeophora M.R. 1230Puerto Rico Dacryodes excelsa decaying woodAF178546AF178546
Tainosphaeria cecropiae CBS 101687 TPuerto RicoCecropia sp.decaying petioleMW984586MW984568OL654064
Tainosphaeria crassiparies S.M.H. 1934 TPuerto RicoHymenaea sp.seed podAF466089
Tainosphaeriella aquatica MFLUCC 17-2370 TThailandunidentifiedsubmerged woodMZ161197MZ161195MZ170694
Tainosphaeriella thailandense MFLUCC 18-1282 TThailandunidentifiedsubmerged woodMZ161196MZ161198MZ170695
Thozetella cristata CBS 101112Venezuelaunidentifiedleaf litterOL654126OL654183OL654065
Thozetella tocklaiensis CBS 378.58 TIndia Camellia sinensis decaying flowerOL654128OL654185OL654067
Tracylla aristata CBS 141404 EAustralia Eucalyptus regnans leavesOL654129OL654186OL654068
Tracylla eucalypti CBS 144429 TColombia Eucalyptus urophylla leavesOL654130OL654187OL654069
Verhulstia trisororum CBS 143234 TNetherlandsn/asoilMG022160MG022181
Zanclospora novae-zelandiae ICMP 15781 ETNew ZealandFuscospora cliffortioidesdecaying woodMW144429MW144411MW147330
Zanclospora ramifera ICMP 22738 TNew Zealandunidentifieddecaying woodMW144433MW144415MW147334

1 T, ET, IT denote ex-type, ex-epitype and ex-isotype strains.

2 a holotype of Chaetosphaeria trianguloconidia; b ex-type of Chloridium submersum; c ex-type of Chloridium paucisetosum; d ex-type of Chloridium terricola; e ex-type of Chloridium aseptatum; f ex-type of Codinaea acaciae.

Total genomic DNA was extracted from 3–4-wk-old cultures grown on MLA using the DNeasy® UltraClean® Microbial Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol for filamentous fungi. PCR amplifications were carried out in 25 μL volume reactions using a Q5 High Fidelity DNA polymerase kit (New England Biolabs Inc., Hitchin, UK) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

The ITS and LSU markers were amplified with the V9G/LR8 primer pair (de Hoog & Gerrits van den Ende 1998, Vilgalys unpubl.). The tef1-α region was amplified with the EF1-983F/EF1-2218R primers (Rehner & Buckley 2005) and tub2 with the T1/Bt2b primer pair (O’Donnell & Cigelnik 1997, Glass & Donaldson 1995). PCR of ITS, LSU, and tef1-α was carried out as described in Réblová et al. (2020). PCR of tub2 was carried out in a BioRad C1000 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) as follows: 98 °C for 1 min; 3 cycles of touchdown PCR denaturation (98 °C for 10 s), annealing (from 62 °C to 58 °C (temperature reduced every cycle for 2 °C) and elongation 72 °C for 90 s; 34 cycles of denaturation (98 °C for 10 s), annealing (57 °C for 30 s) and elongation (72 °C for 90 s) and a final extension step at 72 °C for 5 min.

Amplicons were sequenced in both directions using the PCR and nested primers ITS5, ITS4, JS1, JS7, JS8, and LR7 (Vilgalys & Hester 1990, White et al. 1990, Landvik 1996). Automated sequencing was carried out by Eurofins GATC Biotech Sequencing Service (Cologne, Germany), Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (Utrecht, the Netherlands), and Ottawa Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada). Analysis of raw sequence data and construction of sequence contigs were performed using Sequencher v. 5.4.6 (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, MI, USA).

For ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 markers, histograms of intraspecific and interspecies distances of Chloridium spp. were generated to illustrate the degree of overlap (i.e. barcoding gap). Species from which only rDNA markers were available were not included in the analysis. The matrix of pairwise distances was computed with MEGA v. 11.0.13 using the Kimura two parameters (K2P) model (Tamura et al. 2021). The histogram was plotted in GraphPrism software v. 7.03 (Graphpad Software Inc., LaJolla, CA, USA) using a bin size of 0.002 (ITS), 0.005 (tub2) and 0.0005 (tef1-α, LSU). The estimates of evolutionary divergence are provided in the Supplementary Table S1.

Phylogenetic analyses and species delimitation

The gene sequences, newly generated in this study and those obtained from GenBank, were aligned in MAFFT v. 7.487 (Katoh & Standley 2013) implemented in the CIPRES Science Gateway v. 3.3 (Miller et al. 2010) and manually corrected in BioEdit v. 7.1.8 (Hall 1999), if necessary. Consensus secondary structure (2D) models acquired for the ITS1 and ITS2 of Chloridium spp., and also Codinaea and related taxa (Réblová et al. 2021b), were used to improve the alignment by comparing nucleotides at homologous positions (in helices and loops). The LSU alignment was enhanced using a predicted 2D model of this gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Gutell et al. 1993). The single gene data sets were concatenated and subjected to several phylogenetic analyses. The multilocus sequence alignment was deposited in TreeBASE (29771). The relationships of 11 species of Chloridium described by Wu & Diao (2022) that contained only ITS and several LSU rDNA sequences were included in separate reduced analyses.

We performed species delimitation analyses to provide hypotheses about the species boundaries in the genus Chloridium. They comprised one multilocus method, STACEY (Jones 2017), and three single-locus methods, each based on a different approach, namely, GMYC (Bayesian Inference) (Fujisawa & Barraclough 2013), PTP (Maximum Likelihood) (Zhang et al. 2013) and ABGD (pairwise phylogenetic distance) (Puillandre et al. 2012).

The data set was reduced to strains with unique sequences using the haplotype function from R v. 4.2.1 (R. Core Team 2015) package PEGAS (Paradis 2010). STACEY analysis was performed on a data set of four loci: ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2. In the case of the single-locus methods, LSU alignment was omitted due to a low number of informative sites. The best-fitting model of DNA evolution for each locus was determined using Bayesian information criterion (BIC) in jModelTest v. 2.1.7 (Posada 2008) with the following results: a selected model for ITS was TrNef+I+G, for LSU TrN+I+G, for tef1-α TrN+I+G, and for tub2 TrN+G.

STACEY analysis was calculated in BEAST v. 2.6.7 (Bouckaert et al. 2019) using the add-on STACEY v. 1.2.5 with the following parameters: four separate runs (later combined using LogCombiner software from BEAST package) with chain length of 1 × 108 generations; species tree prior set to Yule model; growth rate prior set to lognormal distribution (M = 5, S = 2); PopPriorScale prior set to lognormal distribution (M = -7, S = 2); relativeDeathRate prior set to beta distribution (α = 1, β = 1 000). The convergence of mcmc was checked in Tracer v. 1.7.1 (Rambaut et al. 2018). The output was processed with Species Delimitation Analyzer (Jones et al. 2015) with the varying value of the collapseheight parameter (0.001–0.02). Out of these values, we chose to present two (0.0067 and 0.102), which resulted in highly supported scenarios.

The GMYC method was performed in R v. 4.2.1 using the package SPLITS (Fujisawa & Barraclough 2013) with input trees calculated in BEAST v. 2.6.7. The PTP method was performed in Python v. 3 (van Rossum & Drake 2019) package PTP (Zhang et al. 2013) with 100 standard bootstrap trees calculated in IQ-TREE v. 2.1.2 (Minh et al. 2020) used as an input. The ABGD (Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery) (Puillandre et al. 2012) method was performed on the ABGD web server (wwwabi.snv.jussieu.fr/public/abgd/abgdweb.html). For results interpretation, we followed the recommendation of Puillandre et al. (2012) and Kekkonen & Herbert (2014), so we present the results of the initial partition closest to P = 0.01. The graphical representation of the species delimitation results was created in iTOL (Interactive Tree Of Life) (Letunic & Bork 2016).

To further inspect the boundaries between species, we classified the strains from our data set into hypothetical populations and performed the species tree inference by starBEAST v. 2.0 (Drummond et al. 2012) implemented in BEAST v. 2.6.7. The hypothetical populations consisted of smallest possible and highly supported clades or individual strains. The species tree was calculated in four separate runs with chain length of 1 × 109 generations, strict molecular clock and coalescent constant population model.

Additional phylogenetic reconstructions of members of Chaetosphaeriaceae and Chloridium s. str. were based on partitioned analyses of three- (ITS, LSU, and tef1-α) and four (ITS, LSU, tef1-α and tub2) loci, respectively. They were calculated using Bayesian Inference (BI) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) analyses through the CIPRES Science Gateway v. 3.3. The best-fit models of nucleotide evolution for each partition (ITS, LSU, tef1-α and tub2) were selected in jModelTest v. 2.1.7. as specified above. The ML analysis was performed with RAxML-HPC v. 8.2.12 (Stamatakis (2014) with a GTRCAT approximation. Statistical support for the nodes was determined by non-parametric bootstrapping (BS) with 1 000 replicates. The BI analysis was performed with MrBayes v. 3.2.7 (Ronquist et al. 2012). Two Bayesian searches were conducted using default parameters. The B-MCMCMC (Bayesian-Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo) analyses lasted until the average standard deviation of split frequencies was below 0.01, with trees saved every 1 000 generations with burn-in 25 %. The BI and ML phylogenetic trees were compared visually in terms of topological conflicts between the supported clades.

To assess the relationships of representatives of Chloridium, Gonytrichum, and Pseudophialocephala with other members of Chaetosphaeriaceae, we performed a phylogenetic analysis based on ITS-LSU-tef1-α concatenated data set. The alignment consisted of 118 strains representing 114 species; it has 3 469 characters including gaps and 1 572 unique character sites (RAxML). The first 90 nucleotides (nt) at the 5′-end of LSU were excluded because most sequences retrieved from GenBank were incomplete. Tracylla aristata and T. eucalypti (Tracyllales) were selected as the outgroup (Réblová et al. 2021ae, Wu & Diao 2022).

Phylogenetic analysis investigating inter- and intraspecific relationships of Chloridium was performed using ITS-LSU-tef1-α-tub2 sequence data set. The sequences of the tub2 gene were added to improve the node resolution and help explore interspecific relationships. The four-gene analysis was based on the alignment of 124 strains, of which 119 were ingroup taxa representing 29 species and varieties of the genus Chloridium; it has 3 690 characters, including gaps and 587 unique character sites (RAxML). The non-coding regions of tub2 were excluded from the analysis. Codinaeella minuta, Codinaea gonytrichodes, Menispora caesia, M. ciliata, and M. tortuosa were selected to root the tree (these species were selected from close relatives of Chloridium with available genes based on the results of previous analysis).

Relationships of 11 species of Chloridium sensu Wu & Diao (2022), for which only rDNA sequences were available, were investigated separately. The original three- and four-gene data sets of Chaetosphaeriaceae and Chloridium were reduced to the two-gene data sets and combined with 11 Chloridium sensu Wu & Diao (2022). Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Chloridium was based on a reduced ITS-LSU sequence data set, including 53 Chloridium strains representing 37 species and varieties. The alignment had 2 384 characters, including gaps and 492 unique character sites (RAxML). The same outgroup as in the previous analysis was selected. Because some of the sequences of new Chloridium species (Wu & Diao 2022) were difficult to align using 2D structures, we applied Gblocks (Castresana 2000) using default options to delimit and remove putative ambiguous regions. We performed three following phylogenetic analyses. The phylogenetic analysis of Chloridium based on ITS-LSU data set initially had 2 384 characters, and 1 264 characters after applying Gblocks, i.e. 53 % of the characters were preserved. To test the phylogenetic hypothesis proposed by Wu & Diao (2022), showing Chloridium divided into two clades by a nested Adautomilanezia-Sporoschisma clade, we performed two ITS-LSU analyses. The Chaetosphaeriaceae data set initially had 2 487 characters, 1 143 characters after applying Gblocks, i.e. 46 % of the characters were preserved. The third reduced ITS-LSU data set comprised only Chloridium and Adautomilanezia-Sporoschisma clades, it had 2 422 characters, and 1 237 characters after application of Gblocks, i.e. 51 % of the characters were preserved.

Relationships among members of the Chl. chlamydosporum species complex were investigated in the phylogenetic analysis of ITS-LSU-tef1-α-tub2 loci. The alignment consisted of 14 sequences representing three species and two varieties. It had 4 142 characters including gaps and 304 unique character sites (RAxML); both coding and non-coding regions of tub2 were included. For this small data set, no outgroup was selected.

Ancestral state reconstruction

We analysed ancestral states of five morphological features, which are used as taxonomic characters, and the ancestral areas of distribution. The data set involving morphological characters, the areas of distribution (gathered from the published distribution of each species from the GlobalFungi database (Větrovský et al. 2020)) and the DNA sequence data spanned across the entire Chloridium genus.

The alignment comprised representative sequences of each species (ex-type strains when possible) from four loci (ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2) with the best-fit models of nucleotide evolution selected in jModelTest v. 2.1.7. The phylogenetic tree for the reconstruction was calculated in MrBayes v. 3.2.7 using partitioned analysis of the four loci.

The reconstruction of the ancestral states and areas was performed in the software package RASP v. 4.2 (Yu et al. 2020) using Bayesian Binary MCMC (Markov chain Monte Carlo) (BBM) method with the following settings: number of cycles 1 000 000; number of chains 10; frequency of samples 100; discard samples 100; temperature: 0.1; state frequencies: estimated (F81).

We split the morphological characters into the following states: I. Conidiophores: (a) unbranched, apex fertile, no collar-like hyphae; (b) unbranched, apex sterile or fertile, with collar-like hyphae; (c) unbranched, apex always sterile, setiform, with collar-like hyphae; (d) branched penicillately, apex fertile, no collar-like hyphae. II. Phialides: (a) terminal, discrete phialides absent; (b) discrete in whorls along the entire conidiophore length, sometimes terminal; (c) discrete in whorls or solitary in the lower part of the conidiophore. III. Conidial colour (a) hyaline; (b) hyaline may become pale brown upon aging; (c) subhyaline to olivaceous or pale brown. IV. Conidial shape: (a) ellipsoidal to obovate, oblong, subglobose; (b) obovate to cuneiform; (c) T- or U-shaped. V. Chlamydospores: (a) absent; (b) present, solitary; (c) present, solitary and in chains; (d) present, in clusters.

The areas of distribution were split into four climate types: (a) all climates; (b) all climates except boreal; (c) all climates except tropics; (d) temperate, subtropics and xeric.

Prediction and identification of base-pair changes in 2D structures of ITS of Chloridium

We used PPfold (Sükösd et al. 2012) and UNAfold (Markham & Zuker 2008) programs to improve multiple sequence alignment of studied sequences of members of Chloridium. The PPfold program uses an explicit evolutionary model and a probabilistic model of structures and provides consensus 2D structures of ITS1 or ITS2 for input multiple sequence alignment. Obtained 2D structure was then refined with the UNAfold web server (www.unafold.org, accessed on 1 July 2022), which employs the Mfold program (Zuker 2003). Final models were visualised with VARNA: Visualisation Applet for RNA program (Darty et al. 2009). In addition, we employed the CBC analyser program (Wolf et al. 2005) to capture CBC (Compensatory Base Change) changes for input sequences. These changes represent the replacement of one standard WC (Watson-Crick) base pair (A-T or G=C) for another WC base pair, thus preserving the RNA secondary structure. In addition to CBC, we can identify two other types of substitutions in helices: hemi-compensatory base change (hCBC), where standard WC base pair is replaced with near-isosteric “wobble pairs” (G/U or A+/C) and non-compensatory base change (non-CBC), where standard base pair is replaced with any non-canonical base pair.

Biogeography assessment using published environmental sequences

The biogeography of species with available ITS sequence data was studied following the workflow of Réblová et al. (2021b). We used the GlobalFungi database, release 4, which contains 57 184 samples from 515 studies, 791 513 743 unique ITS1, and 2 147 483 647 unique ITS2 sequences. Because the GlobalFungi database contains separate ITS1 and ITS2 sequences, these two regions were analysed separately. First, we determined the interspecies genetic distances for each ITS spacer. In the case of species from the section Pseudophialocephala, ITS spacers are not distinctive for individual species; therefore, we evaluated the whole complex together. In some other species, only one of the ITS spacers is distinctive, and only the total sequence identity threshold should be used to link them to the metabarcoding data unambiguously. Preliminary evaluation of the variability of ITS1 and ITS2 sequences prompted the adjustment of their processing and extraction. In particular, we subjected all unique ITS1 and ITS2 haplotypes from our study (Supplementary Table S2) to an exact hit similarity search in the GlobalFungi, which searches for sequences identical in both length and sequence. This adaptation is based on the following findings. Both varieties of Chl. chloridioides have identical ITS1 sequence and can be distinguished using ITS2 spacer only. One haplotype of Chl. fuscum (TTI-0889) is identical with available ITS2 sequences of the two Chl. mirabile strains, but they can be separated using ITS1 spacer. In general, ITS1 spacer was more variable (four haplotypes in Chl. chlamydosporum, three in Chl. caudigerum, Chl. fuscum, Chl. subglobosum, and Chl. virescens) than ITS2 spacer (three in Chl. fuscum and Chl. setosum, two in Chl. chlamydosporum and Chl. chloridioides). We found that ITS spacers stored in GlobalFungi, originally extracted using ITSx extractor (Bengtsson-Palme et al. 2013), do not always represent full-length sequences (usually 1–2 bp at the 5′ end of ITS2 are missing). Therefore, we used ITSx extractor to extract the spacers from our data using the SEED2 platform (Větrovský et al. 2018).

Sampling sites were plotted on a map using Tableau Desktop v. 2021.3 (Tableau Software, Seattle, WA, USA). Primary incidence data and respective metadata, e.g. location, substrate, biome, pH and climatic data such as the mean annual precipitation (MAP) and mean annual temperature (MAT) were obtained for each taxon from the GlobalFungi database (Supplementary Table S3). Detailed information about the biome was obtained from Ecoregions 2017 © Resolve database (available online: ecoregions.appspot.com).

RESULTS

Phylogenetic analyses and species delimitation

Phylogenetic analyses of ITS-LSU-tef1-α sequences assessed the relationships of Chloridium with members of Chaetosphaeriaceae. The phylogenetic trees generated by BI and ML analyses were largely congruent; the nodes with support values of ≥ 75 % ML BS and ≥ 0.95 BI PP were considered well-supported. The ML tree is shown in Fig. 2. In the family Chaetosphaeriaceae, 58 well-supported lineages representing genera and natural species groups have been resolved. Three original sections of Chloridium were shown as unrelated lineages. Chloridium, centred on Chl. virescens, was resolved as a well-supported monophyletic clade (80 % ML BS/1.0 BI PP). The core of the genus included ex-type and non-type strains of the type species of genera Bisporomyces, Chloridium, Cirrhomyces, Gonytrichum, Mesobotrys, and Pseudophialocephala, and other unidentified strains of Chloridium described as new to science in this study. Four species referred to the section Gongromeriza grouped as two unrelated lineages. The Gongromeriza (100/1.0) clade comprised G. myriocarpa and G. pygmaea. The ex-type strains of Chl. lignicola CBS 143.54 and Chl. pachytrachelum CBS 645.75, earlier attributed to Gongromeriza section, and the ex-type strain of Chl. pini CBS 146011 formed an undescribed, strongly supported monophyletic lineage (100/1.0) proposed as the new genus Gongromerizella. The section Psilobotrys, originally represented by Chl. botryoideum var. botryoideum (CBS 145639, M.R. 3567), Chl. botryoideum var. minutum (CBS 223.74, CBS 247.75) and Chl. cylindrosporum (CBS 101429), split into three lineages, such as Chaetosphaeria, Fusichloridium, and Psilobotrys.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g002a.jpg
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g002b.jpg

Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree of selected members of the family Chaetosphaeriaceae based on analysis of a concatenated data set (ITS, LSU and tef1-α). Species names given in bold are taxonomic novelties. T, ET and IT denote ex-type, ex-epitype and ex-isotype strains. Thickened branches indicate branch support with ML BS = 100 % and PP values = 1.0. Branch support of nodes ≥ 75 % ML and ≥ 0.95 PP is indicated above or below branches.

The species delimitation analysis of Chloridium s. str. resulted in general agreement across different methods, as illustrated in Fig. 3. STACEY with a lower collapseheight value (0.0067) resulted in the delimitation of 22 species corresponding to the final taxonomic conclusion of this paper except for the section Pseudophialocephala, which was delimited as a single species. The other supported scenario with a collapseheight value of 0.0102 delimited 19 species by collapsing Chl. setosum with Chl. virescens, Chl. bellum with Chl. guttiferum and Chl. chlamydosporum with Chl. peruense.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g003.jpg

Schematic representation of species delimitation results in the genus Chloridium based on four DNA sequence loci (ITS, LSU, tef1-α and tub2). Only unique sequences (n = 111) were retained for the delimitation. The analysis consisted of a multilocus method STACEY performed with two different values of collapseheight parameter (0.0067 and 0.102) and three single-locus species delimitation methods (GMYC, PTP and ABGD). The results of each method are depicted by coloured bars with different colours representing tentative delimited species. Blank spaces in coloured bars represent missing data.

The results of single-locus methods based on the ITS were similar to the results of STACEY. GMYC generated identical results to STACEY with a lower collapseheight value. PTP yielded the same results with one exception as Chl. setosum formed a species together with Chl. virescens. ABGD results were similar, with one excessively lumped clade joining Chl. bellum, Chl. biforme, Chl. guttiferum, Chl. moratum, Chl. virescens, and Chl. setosum into one species. ABGD also delimited Chl. peruense as part of Chl. chlamydosporum, similarly to STACEY, with a higher collapseheight value.

Single-locus methods based on tef1-α also gained similar results to STACEY, with most differences accumulated in the clade including Chl. chlamydosporum, Chl. detriticola and Chl. peruense. GMYC lumped Chl. peruense together with Chl. guttiferum and split Chl. chloridioides into two species. This split was present in five of nine single-locus methods and is reflected in the description of two varieties of Chl. chloridioides (var. chloridioides and var. convolutum). PTP based on tef1-α was the method that split the data set into the largest number of hypothetical species. Chloridium chlamydosporum was overly split into four species (no other method split this clade into more than one species), Chl. detriticola was split into two species (although no other method supported this split, Chl. detriticola was divided into two varieties because of important differences in the secondary structure of ITS), Chl. bellum was split into two species (this split was supported by three out of nine single-locus methods and is reflected by the description of two varieties, var. bellum and var. luteum), and section Pseudophialocephala was split into two hypothetical species. In contrast to PTP, ABGD based on the tef1-α locus, delimited fewer species than STACEY. Chloridium guttiferum was lumped together with Chl. chlamydosporum, Chl. moratum and Chl. peruense, and Chl. chloridioides was split into two species. The delimitations based on tub2 locus also differed in the clade of Chl. chlamydosporum and related species. Chloridium chlamydosporum was lumped together with Chl. detriticola and Chl. peruense by all three single-locus methods. All three methods also lumped Chl. gamsii and Chl. biforme. PTP and ABGD also split Chl. bellum into two species (var. bellum and var. luteum), Chl. chloridioides into two species (var. chloridioides and var. convolutum) and section Pseudophialocephala into two (ABGD) and five (PTP) species.

The results of the species tree inference by starBEAST (Fig. 4) were in general agreement with other phylogenetic and species delimitation analyses, therefore supporting our taxonomic decisions with few exceptions. There was very low support throughout the Pseudophialocephala section, suggesting ongoing recombination within the whole clade with the possible interpretation of the whole section being only one species. Similar pattern of ongoing recombination can be found within species with high number of strains like Chl. virescens, Chl. chlamydosporum or Chl. fuscum. In those cases, we decided for the broad concept of species. There is also lowered support within the clade of Chl. bellum and Chl. guttiferum, but more strains or sequence data from these species would be necessary to get some idea about the relationships in this complex. There were also several differences between the species tree inference and ML analysis based on concatenated dataset in the topology of the deeper nodes which are not directly affecting the taxonomic decisions including the sectional classification. There are differences in the topological positions of Chl. caudigerum, Chl. moratum, Chl. elongatum, Chl. volubile, and Chl. chloroconium, see Figs. 4, ,5.5. Some of the deeper nodes also gain low support in contrast with the analysis of the concatenated dataset, e.g. Chl. novae-zelandiae.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g004.jpg

Species tree of 111 unique strains classified into 43 hypothetical populations calculated in starBEAST using DNA sequences of four loci (ITS, LSU, tef1-α and tub2).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g005a.jpg
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g005b.jpg

Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree of the genus Chloridium based on analysis of a concatenated data set (ITS, LSU, tef1-α and tub2). The genus is distinguished into eight sections. Species names given in bold are taxonomic novelties. T and ET denote ex-type and ex-epitype strains. Thickened branches indicate branch support with ML BS = 100 % and PP values = 1.0. Branch support of nodes ≥ 75 % ML and ≥ 0.95 PP is indicated above or below branches. The conidiophore types and presence/absence of chlamydospores for individual sections are indicated by icons.

The final phylogenetic hypothesis of Chloridium was based on STACEY analysis and ML/BI analyses of concatenated data set (ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2) of 119 Chloridium strains. The fully resolved ML tree is shown in Fig. 5. Tree topologies between ML and BI analyses did not differ, and both analyses supported the division of Chloridium into eight well-supported clades introduced as sections in this study. Species with chloridium-type conidiophores were resolved as three lineages, i.e. Chloridium, Cryptogonytrichum, and Metachloridium. The genus Gonytrichum was shown as paraphyletic and divided into four clades, i.e. Gonytrichum, Mesobotrys, Gonytrichopsis, and Volubilia. The topology of sections is illustrated in detail in the radial ML tree in Fig. 6. Results of ML/BI analyses were congruent with STACEY; they differed in the topology of the sect. Cryptogonytrichum (Chl. novae-zelandiae) which was resolved basal to all species, and sect. Mesobotrys which was resolved as a sister to the sect. Pseudophialocephala in STACEY. Among the strains analysed, there were also 21 strains of Chl. virescens var. caudigerum and var. chlamydosporum listed in Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976). They were revealed to belong to seven species; the earlier varieties of Chl. virescens were confirmed as separate species, i.e. Chl. caudigerum and Chl. chlamydosporum. Additional strains of undescribed fungi represented 13 new species and varieties and are described below. Members of the genus Pseudophialocephala and morphologically similar fungi formed a monophyletic strongly supported clade (100/1.0) divided into five lineages without statistical support except for three Dutch soil isolates (CBS 148973 and two others) that formed a strongly supported subclade in the ML analysis (100/0.77). The ex-type strain of L. costaricense CBS 409.94 clustered in a subclade with ex-types of Chl. paucisetosum CGMCC 3.19620 and Chl. terricola HGUP4519. Chloridium humicola CBS 420.73 formed another subclade, and the ex-type strains of Chl. aquaticum MFLUCC 11-0212 and Ps. cuneata GZCC 20-0005 are grouped as individual lineages. The ML/BI and STACEY analyses differed in the position of L. costaricense, which clustered only with Chl. paucisetosum in STACEY and the position of Chl. aquaticum that formed a subclade with the Dutch isolates in STACEY. In the BI analysis, relationships among members of the Pseudophialocephala sections remained unresolved.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g006.jpg

Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree of the genus Chloridium based on analysis of concatenated data set (ITS, LSU, tef1-α and tub2) presented in radial format.

Because only rDNA sequences (ITS and a few LSU) were available for 11 species of Chloridium described by Wu & Diao (2022), they were subjected to four separate phylogenetic analyses. The first ML analysis was based on the reduced ITS-LSU sequence data set comprising representative strains of Chloridium from the previous phylogeny combined with species from Wu & Diao (2022). The ML phylogenetic tree is illustrated in Fig. 7; it shows relationships of all species accepted in Chloridium, except for Chl. proliferatum CGMCC 3.20766. Because it was challenging to align the ITS sequence of the latter species (GenBank accession OL628678, Wu & Diao 2022), it had to be excluded. In the preliminary analysis, Chl. proliferatum nested in the Chl. fuscum clade on a long branch, although the latter species is otherwise morphologically and genetically homogeneous (results not shown). Therefore, the alignment was treated with Gblocks. The position of Chl. proliferatum was resolved as a single lineage close to Chl. crousii, Chl. tropicale and Chl. xishuangbannaense (Supplementary Fig. S1). Chloridium culmicula grouped on a separate long branch basal to all species. The following two phylogenetic analyses were conducted to test the hypothesis of Wu & Diao (2022), in particular, to address the monophyly of Chloridium, which has been questioned, and its relationship to the Adautomilanezia-Sporoschisma clade. The addition of 11 Chloridium strains from Wu & Diao (2022) to the current ITS-LSU data set of Chaetosphaeriaceae led to the use of Gblocks again with default settings. One analysis was performed on a data set including all members of Chaetosphaeriaceae, while the other comprised only Chloridium and Adautomilanezia-Sporoschisma clades. Two ML trees are shown in the Supplementary Figs S2, S3. In both analyses, we confirmed the monophyly of the Chloridium and Adautomilanezia-Sporoschisma clades. Interestingly, the ex-type strain of Chl. culmicola CGMCC 3.20639 was shown outside Chloridium as a sister to Cacumisporium capitulatum (Supplementary Fig. S2).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g007.jpg

Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree of the genus Chloridium based on analysis of a concatenated data set (ITS, LSU). The genus is distinguished into eight sections. Species names given in bold and marked in blue colour are Chloridium species described by Wu & Diao (2022). Thickened branches indicate branch support with ML BS = 100 % and PP values = 1.0. Branch support of nodes ≥ 75 % ML and ≥ 0.95 PP is indicated above or below branches.

In the final analysis, we assessed the relationships of the Chl. chlamydosporum species complex. We analysed the ITS-LSU-tef1-α-tub2 sequence data set comprising the ex-type strain of Chl. chlamydosporum CBS 114.41 and 13 morphologically highly similar strains initially identified as Chl. virescens var. chlamydosporum. The ML tree is illustrated in Fig. 8. The ML and BI trees were largely congruent. These isolates were divided into three major groups representing Chl. chlamydosporum (100/1.0) and two new species, Chl. detriticola (100/1.0) with two varieties and Chl. peruense as a single lineage.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g008.jpg

Analysis of Chloridium chlamydosporum species complex. A. Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree based on analysis of concatenated data set (ITS, LSU, tef1-α and tub2), accompanied by images of conidia and their measurements. Species names given in bold are taxonomic novelties. T denotes ex-type strains. Thickened branches indicate branch support with ML BS = 100 % and PP values = 1.0. Branch support of nodes ≥ 75 % ML and ≥ 0.95 PP is indicated above or below branches. B. ITS1 secondary structure: helix H1 be divided into three zones, which are highlighted by colour, i.e. green (zone 1), turquoise (zone 2), dark blue (zone 3).

Barcode analyses

In all markers, species of the Pseudophialocephala section recognised in our study differed little or not at all. This divergence falls within the range of intraspecific variation observed in the other species in this study (Fig. 9). Therefore, we do not consider species of that section in the barcoding gap analysis. Other genetically very closely related species, Chl. bellum and Chl. guttiferum, Chl. gamsii and Chl. biforme, were responsible for the overlapping intraspecific and interspecific variability and the absence of a clear barcoding gap in all markers. For the ITS marker, the similarity between some Chl. fuscum strains and between Chl. bellum and Chl. guttiferum species was the same (0.011). In other species, similarities of 0.000–0.011 were intraspecific, values of 0.011–0.015 represented the barcoding gap, and higher similarities represented interspecific variability. Similarly, in the case of tef1-α, no barcoding gap was observed. Still, we could trace a zone starting at the distance of 0.013, where intraspecific variation transitions into the variation observed between related species (e.g. distance 0.014, Chl. guttiferum vs Chl. peruense) or varieties of the same species. Distances above 0.015 (Chl. luteum var. luteum vs var. bellum) represented exclusively interspecific variability. No clear barcoding gap was found for the marker tub2, and values around 0.04 represented both intraspecific (Chl. chlamydosporum) and interspecific (Chl. gamsii vs Chl. biforme) variation. Values higher than 0.05 belonged exclusively to interspecific variability. In the case of LSU, the pure intraspecific distance was observed only at values of 0.0–0.0027. Between the values 0.0027 and 0.004, there is a mixture of intraspecific and interspecific variability; higher values belong to pure interspecific variability.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g009.jpg

Barcoding gap. The frequency distribution graphs of the Kimura 2-parameter distances of ITS, LSU, tef1-α and tub2 DNA sequences (i.e. barcoding gaps). The intraspecific distances are shown as blue bars and interspecific distances as grey bars. The asterisk (*) indicates values where intra and interspecies variability overlap.

Ancestral state reconstruction

The reconstruction of ancestral states and climatic regions is shown in Fig. 10. The ancestral state of the conidiophore type was an unbranched conidiophore with a fertile apex and without collar-like hyphae. The unbranched setiform conidiophores with a sterile apex and collar-like hyphae are derived and evolved independently in at least two lineages. Unbranched conidiophores, with a sterile or fertile apex and collar-like hyphae, evolved in one lineage only. Penicillately branched conidiophores without collar-like hyphae are highly derived and evolved only in one lineage. The conidiophore types correlate with the arrangement of phialides. Terminal integrated phialide is the ancestral state that occurs in all major lineages. The presence of a discrete phialide formed in whorls along the entire length of the conidiophore is a derived character that evolved in only one lineage. Discrete phialide formed in whorls or solitary in the lower part of the conidiophore is also derived and originated at least two times independently. The ancestral and most prevalent shape of conidia was ellipsoidal, oblong, and subglobose, whereas other types were rare, derived, and evolved independently twice.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g010.jpg

Reconstruction of ancestral states and areas using Bayesian Binary MCMC (BBM) method in Rasp v. 4.2 using phylogenetic trees calculated in MrBayes v. 3.2.7. A–E. Reconstruction of ancestral states of morphological characters. F. Ancestral areas reconstruction of species distribution.

Similarly, the dominant and ancestral conidial colour was hyaline, and darker shades were derived and evolved in five independent lineages. The chlamydospore types are randomly distributed across the phylogenetic tree. In the common ancestors of Chloridium, Gonytrichum, and Volubilia sections, the presence of chlamydospores is an ancestral state. The presence of chlamydospores in chains or clusters was derived and evolved independently twice in Chl. chloroconium (sect. Gonytrichopsis) and Chl. elongatum (sect. Metachloridium). Ancestral reconstruction of the geographical distribution showed that the occurrence in temperate, subtropical or xeric climatic regions together with all climates except boreal and tundra, is ancestral. Interestingly, the ability to colonise colder areas (i.e. all climates, all climates accept boreal and tundra, and all climates except tropics) is derived.

Consensus 2D structure of ITS1 and ITS2

2D models of the ITS1 and ITS2 consensus structures for the genus Chloridium mapped to Chl. virescens were generated. For ITS1, we identified only two helices (not shown). The H1 helix has a variable length of 28–71 nt and represents a region of high variability. In Chl. virescens, the H1 helix is 61 nt long; it contains two nt bulge (TT), a bulge loop with five nt (GCTAA), one non-WC pair C/C and four nt hairpin loop. The second helix consists of only three WC base pairs and four nt hairpin loops and is highly conserved in all species.

The H1 helix of ITS1 was exploited in the classification of members of the Chl. chlamydosporum species complex, where it represented the main variability of the whole ITS region. In particular, the H1 helix exhibited changes in its second part, which can be divided into three zones (Fig. 8). In Chl. chlamydosporum, this upper part is the longest. It consists of 18 bp, including two non-canonical G/A and G/G bp and 2–3 G/U wobble bp, and contains all three zones. Other species, such as Chl. peruense, Chl. detricola var. detricola and var. effusum, have this part reduced to 12, 13 and 7 bp. In comparison, two zones are present in Chl. detriticola var. detriticola and Chl. peruense, only one zone is typical of Chl. detriticola var. effusum. There is also a reduction in the number of non-WC and wobble pairs. In the case of Chl. peruense, the duplex contains only one non-WC U/C pair and one wobble pair. Chloridium detriticola var. detriticola has only two wobble pairs, while Chl. detriticola var. effusum consists of only standard WC pairs.

The consensus ITS2 structure of members of Chloridium consisted of three helices (H1–H3). Helix H4 was not detected due to large sequence variability. In the ITS2 molecule, we identified all existing substitutions among species of Chloridium, which were mapped onto the predicted 2D structure model of ITS2 of Chl. virescens (Fig. 11). In Chl. virescens, H1 is the shortest helix consisting of five WC base pairs with three nt hairpin loops. H2 helix contains nine WC base pairs, one bulge base (A) in the middle of the helix, and four nt hairpin loops. The H3 is the longest duplex (69 nt). It contains five-bulge bases, one non-WC C/U base pair, a short internal loop with three base pairs (A/C, A-U, A/G), and a four nt hairpin loop.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g011.jpg

ITS2 secondary structure of Chloridium virescens (GenBank accession no. OP455441) and 5.8S-28S rRNA gene hybridisation (proximal stem region). ITS2 helices are numbered I–III. All substitutions recorded among members of Chloridium are mapped on the 2D model. Identified substitutions are colour coded: CBC (green), hCBC (blue) and non-CBC (red). Hairpin loops, junction regions and an area of the putative IV helix are highlighted with grey colour to represent regions with a variable number of nucleotides or sequence variation.

Helix H3 of ITS2 is a site of high interspecific variability. In Chl. virescens, the H3 helix consists of 26 base pairs. Among them, there are two tandem wobble pairs G/U. The first one changes into canonical G=C pair in Chl. crousii and Chl. xishuangbannaense (sect. Chloridium), Chl. cylindrosporellum and Chl. elongatum (Metachloridium), Chl. subglobosum (Gonytrichum) and in all species of section Pseudophialocephala, while the second G/U pair is substituted by entirely different non-WC pairs G/G for the sect. Pseudophialocephala and U/U for Chl. crousii and Chl. xishuangbannaense (Chloridium). The H3 duplex shows only one CBC change A-U → G=C in the central part, which is seen in the Chl. chlamydosporum species complex and several other species of its sister clade. Interestingly, in several species of the section Chloridium, the standard A-U changes to wobble pair G/U (Chl. caudigerum, Chl. jilinense) or non-canonical C/C (Chl. crousii and Chl. xishuangbannaense), while in Chl. caesium (sect. Gonytrichum), it is replaced by A/G. In the upper part of the H3 helix occur three near-isosteric substitutions between standard and wobble pairs (G=C → G/U), two exclusively exhibit Chl. chloridioides (Gonytrichum), and the third one is shared by all members of the Mesobotrys section and selected species of the sections Chloridium and Cryptogonytrichum. The fourth near-isosteric substitution between standard and wobble pair (A-U → A/C) occurs in Chl. chloroconium, Chl. tropicale, and Chl. chloridioides representing three different sections. The last pair adjacent to the hairpin loop is highly variable; we observed that this position tolerates standard, wobble, or non-WC pairs.

Biogeography, ecology, and diversity analysis of Chloridium in environmental samples

Data mining in the GlobalFungi database, based on the Exact hit similarity rule, resulted in 8 806 021 reads that matched the ITS1 or ITS2 sequences of the studied taxa. This means that reads assigned to Chloridium account for 0.3 % of all reads in the database. Chloridium tropicale is the only species in the genus that was not found in metabarcoding data. On average, each species was found in 1 485 samples (minimum: 1–2 samples for Chl. xishuangbannaense and Chl. novae-zelandiae, maximum: 7 903 samples for Chl. detriticola var. detriticola). Most samples came from bulk, top or rhizosphere soil (87 %), while other substrates such as roots (6 %), litter (3 %), and deadwood (3 %) were less frequent. Each species shows a preference for soil type, especially for bulk soil, i.e. soil outside the rhizosphere where nutrients are scarce (e.g. Chl. caudigerum, Chl. guttiferum, Chl. gamsii, Chl. mirabile) over the topsoil. In contrast, the topsoil, the upper layer of soil where organic nutrients are abundant, is strongly preferred by other species (e.g. Chl. cylindrosporellum, Chl. fuscum, Chl. moratum, Chl. volubile). Several species are relatively more common on organic residues, such as litter (Chl. caudigerum, Chl. chloridioides, Chl. chloroconium, Chl. subglobosum) and deadwood (Chl. caudigerum, Chl. jilinense, Chl. subglobosum).

Most of the samples were taken in the forest (94 %), followed by grasslands (2 %), croplands (1 %), and other biomes. In addition to the general abundance in forests, several species are fairly common in arable land (Chl. bellum, Chl. elongatum, Chl. fuscum, Chl. mirabile, Chl. humicola species complex, Chl. proliferatum) or grasslands (Chl. bellum, Chl. caesium, Chl. chlamydosporum, Chl. chloroconium, Chl. fuscum, Chl. gamsii, Chl. guttiferum, Chl. humicola complex, Chl. setosum). The most abundant species were Chl. detriticola var. detriticola (7 903 samples, 132 studies), Chl. fuscum (7 246 samples, 186 studies), Chl. moratum (4 405 samples, 57 studies), Chl. volubile (3 559 samples, 81 studies), Chl. shangsiense (3 314 samples, 71 studies), Chl. humicola species complex (3 287 samples, 174 studies), Chl. bellum var. bellum (2 549 samples, 97 studies) and Chl. cylindrosporellum (2 529 samples, 47 studies). Given the density of sampling in different regions, we can draw some well-founded conclusions (Fig. 12, Supplementary Fig. S4, Suplemmentary Tables S2, S3). Most species are widely distributed and only some species have a more or less restricted geographical distribution, i.e. China or Vietnam: Chl. crousii, Chl. proliferatum, Chl. xishuangbannaense; Australasia: Chl. biforme, Chl. novae-zelandiae; Northern Hemisphere: Chl. chloridioides, Chl. jilinense, Chl. kirkii, Chl. subglobosum.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g012.jpg

Biogeography of Chloridium inferred from the GlobalFungi database data. The distribution types are demonstrated on example species. A. Global distribution across all climatic zones (Chl. detriticola var. detriticola). B. Global distribution across multiple climatic zones, but not in boreal (Chl. bellum var. bellum). C. As in the previous case, but with a high preference for warmer and humid areas and South America. D. Distributed in temperate and colder climatic zones (Chl. caudigerum). E. Global distribution in temperate, subtropical and xeric sites (Chl. caesium). F. Australasian distribution on temperate and xeric sites (Chl. biforme in green, Chl. novae-zelandiae in red).

In general, the distribution of species is primarily governed by climatic zones and secondarily by geography. The species can be divided into six types based on climatic conditions and geography preferences. Group 1: Species distributed globally (i.e. with exceptions of little sampled Africa and Antarctica, in some species) in all climatic zones (Chl. chloroconium, Chl. culmicola, Chl. detriticola var. detriticola, Chl. detriticola var. effusum, Chl. shangsiense, Chl. volubile). The average Mean Annual Temperature (MAT) was 8.4–13.4 °C, and the Mean Annual Precipitation (MAP) was 974–1 349 mm. Group 2: Distributed in temperate, continental humid, subtropical, tropical, and drier climates but with absence or rare occurrence in the colder zones (boreal, tundra), either globally (Chl. bellum var. bellum, Chl. chlamydosporum, Chl. cylindrosporellum, Chl. fuscum, Chl. guttiferum, Chl. humicola species complex, Chl. mirabile, Chl. moratum, Chl. peruense, Chl. setosum, Chl. ypsilosporum) or with geographically limited distribution (Chl. gamsii, Europe, N. America, Australasia) (MAT 7.8–20 °C, MAP 860–1 801 mm). Group 3: Distributed in subtropical, temperate, continental humid, tundra, or boreal climatic zone in Northern Hemisphere (Chl. chloridioides var. chloridioides) or also in Australasia (Chl. caudigerum) (MAT 6.9–7.5 °C, 657–743 mm). Group 4: Occurring in temperate and subtropical climatic regions, and sometimes also on xeric sites either globally (Chl. caesium), almost globally (Chl. virescens mainly in Europe, absent in Northern America), limited to Northern Hemisphere (Chl. chloridioides var. convolutum, Chl. culmicola, Chl. elongatum, Chl. jilinense, Chl. kirkiii, Chl. subglobosum), Australasia (Chl. biforme, Chl. novae-zelandiae) or China (Chl. crousii) (MAT 7.6–19.75 °C, MAP 645–1 550 mm). Group 5: Species such as Chl. proliferatum and Chl. xishuangbannaense, both very rare and known from subtropical/tropical regions in China and Vietnam.

Using GlobalFungi database, we identified several diversity hotspots. As the temperate and relatively humid climate suits all studied species, 23 species (except Chl. culmicola, Chl. crousii, Chl. mirabile, Chl. biforme, Chl. novae-zelandiae, Chl. xishuangbannaense, Chl. proliferatum) are found in the forests of Central Europe. Another hotspot was a humid subtropical forest on the South China-Laos border, where species preferring temperate, subtropical, and tropical climate meet (Chl. bellum, Chl. caudigerum, Chl. chlamydosporum, Chl. chloridioides var. convolutum, Chl. chloroconium, Chl. culmicola, Chl. cylindrosporellum, Chl. detriticola var. detriticola and var. effusum, Chl. elongatum, Chl. mirabile, Chl. fuscum, Chl. humicola species complex, Chl. kirkii, Chl. moratum, Chl. peruense, Chl. shangsiense, Chl. sinense, Chl. volubile, Chl. ypsilosporum). This is also due to the large sampling depth of the study of Sun et al. (2021) focusing on this area.

Taxonomy

Chloridium Link, Mag. Gesell. naturf. Freunde, Berlin 3: 13. 1809. Emend. Réblová & Hern.-Restr.

Synonyms: Gonytrichum Nees & T. Nees, Nova Acta Phys.-Med. Acad. Caes. Leop.-Carol. Nat. Cur. 9: 244. 1818.

Mesobotrys Sacc., Michelia 2: 27. 1880.

Cirrhomyces Höhn., Ann. Mycol. 1: 529. 1903.

Melanopsammella Höhn., Ann. Mycol. 17: 121. 1920.

Bisporomyces van Beyma, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 6: 276. 1940.

Pseudophialocephala M.S. Calabon et al., Mycosphere 13: 502. 2022.

Monostachys Arnaud, Bull. Trimestriel Soc. Mycol. France 69: 278. 1953. (Nom. inval. Art. 36).

Sphaeromycetella Arnaud, Bull. Trimestriel Soc. Mycol. France 69: 279. 1953. (Nom. inval. Art. 36.)

? Piminella Arnaud, Bull. Trimestriel Soc. Mycol. France 69: 281. 1953. (Nom. inval. Art. 36.)

Type species: Chloridium virescens (Pers.) W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.

Emended description: Colonies effuse, hairy or finely bristle-like, or pulvinate, brown, becoming whitish, white grey, yellow, yellow-green, green, beige, olivaceous brown, olivaceous grey or amber when sporulating; composed of conidiophores and ascomata. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores absent or present; they are formed in one layer (all conidiophores of the same average length) or two layers (as shorter and longer setiform but always fertile conidiophores), solitary, scattered, crowded or caespitose, unbranched, sometimes branched (in culture), often with percurrent proliferations, brown, cylindrical or subulate. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, terminal, integrated, extending percurrently, occasionally sympodially (in culture), conidiogenous locus with multiple loci, sometimes protruding above the collarette, with annellations; collarettes flaring, shortly funnel-shaped, often inconspicuous. Conidia ellipsoidal, ellipsoidal to oblong, subglobose, suballantoid, obovate, sometimes cuneiform, hyaline, occasionally turn pale brown (in aged material), or pale brown at maturity, aseptate, smooth, adhering in heads or cirrhi. Chlamydospores absent or present; lateral, terminal, intercalary, sessile or on a stipe, solitary, or in chains, aseptate, brown, thick-walled, smooth. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores absent or present; solitary, scattered, crowded or caespitose, the main stalk is unbranched, brown, cylindrical or subulate, apex setiform, sterile, straight, flexuous, uncinate or circinate, sometimes terminating into a phialide. In the nodes grow collar-like hyphae from which arise phialides and setae. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, discrete, borne on a collar-like hypha in whorls or directly on the conidiophore, or integrated terminal, conidiogenous locus with multiple loci, sometimes protruding above the collarette; collarettes flaring, inconspicuous. Conidia ellipsoidal, ellipsoidal-oblong, subglobose, occasionally T- or U-shaped to almost deltoid, mostly hyaline, sometimes subhyaline to pale olivaceous, aseptate, adhering in heads or cirrhi. Chlamydospores absent or present; lateral, terminal, intercalary, sessile or on a stipe, solitary, in short chains or clusters, aseptate, brown, thick-walled, smooth. The phialocephala-type conidiophores absent or present; macronematous, mononematous, solitary or fasciculate, erect, composed of a penicillately branched head and a stipe that is cylindrical to subulate, stout, straight or slightly flexuous, brown, proliferating, base slightly inflated, bulbous or composed of a true foot cell. Conidiogenous apparatus compact, with dense penicillate branching, consisting of several levels of hyaline or pale brown branches and conidiogenous cells arising in groups from the tip of metulae. Conidiogenous cells monophialidic, cylindrical to lageniform, integrated, terminal, hyaline to subhyaline, extending percurrently, conidiogenous locus with multiple loci sometimes protruding above the collarette, with annellations; collarettes short, flaring or inconspicuous. Conidia ellipsoidal to obovate, cuneate to rhomboid, subhyaline, becoming pale brown after detachment, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in slimy glossy heads. Chlamydospores absent. The pseudogliomastix-type conidiophores absent or present; semimacronematous or micronematous with a loosely penicillately branched head or reduced to scattered single phialides on undifferentiated hyphae, solitary, erect or slightly decumbent, subhyaline, later elongated and pigmented. Conidiogenous cells monophialidic, cylindrical, integrated, terminal, hyaline or subhyaline, conidiogenous locus with multiple loci; collarettes short, flaring or indistinct. Conidia mostly obovate, sometimes with a basal scar, hyaline to subhyaline becoming olivaceous brown, smooth, accumulating in heads or irregularly shaped slime. Chlamydospores absent. Sexual morph. Ascomata perithecial, non-stromatic, superficial, glabrous or setose, setae always sterile, acute. Ostiole periphysate. Paraphyses present, disintegrating with age. Asci unitunicate, stipitate, arising from croziers, with a non-amyloid, refractive apical annulus. Ascospores fragmenting within the ascus into part spores, fusiform, hyaline, 1-septate, finely verrucose, or smooth.

Habitat and geographical distribution: Members of Chloridium are saprobes on decaying plant material in terrestrial and freshwater habitats, especially on wood in advanced stages of decay, buried in soil or leaf litter; many species are soil dwellers. Members of Chloridium occur worldwide, mostly in temperate, subtropical, or tropical regions. In contrast, only a few species inhabit the boreal and tundra biomes. Typical habitats are moist temperate, and subtropical forests.

Notes: The present phylogenetic analyses confirmed that the genera Chloridium, Gonytrichum, and Pseudophialocephala are closely related and form a monophyletic, well-supported clade with eight subclades that share some morphological characteristics. These subclades are introduced as sections: Chloridium, Cryptogonytrichum, Gonytrichopsis, Gonytrichum, Mesobotrys, Metachloridium, Pseudophialocephala, and Volubilia (Figs 5, ,6).6). The generic concept has been emended. Chloridium is presented as a polythetic taxon with a new infrageneric classification. The disposition of species of genera Bisporomyces, Cirrhomyces, Gonytrichum, Mesobotrys, and Pseudophialocephala, accepted as synonyms of the genus Chloridium, is given in Table 3.

Table 3.

Disposition of species of Bisporomyces, Cirrhomyces, Gonytrichum, Mesobotrys and Pseudophialocephala, accepted as synonyms of Chloridium.

Name in Index of Fungi Current name Current ordinal position Reference
Bisporomyces chlamydosporus Chloridium chlamydosporum Chaetosphaeriales Hughes (1951), this study
Bisporomyces lignicola Gongromerizella lignicola Chaetosphaeriales This study
Cirrhomyces caudiger Chloridium caudigerum Chaetosphaeriales Hughes (1951), this study
Cirrhomyces flavovirens Chloridium virescens Chaetosphaeriales Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976)
Cirrhomyces viridis Chloridium virescens Chaetosphaeriales Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976)
Gonytrichum caesium var. caesium Chloridium caesium Chaetosphaeriales Réblová et al. (2016)
Gonytrichum caesium var. chloridioides Chloridium chloridioides Chaetosphaeriales This study
Gonytrichum caesium var. subglobosum Chloridium subglobosum Chaetosphaeriales This study
Gonytrichum chlamydosporium var. chlamydosporium Chloridium chloroconium Chaetosphaeriales Réblová et al. (2016)
Gonytrichum chlamydosporium var. simile Chloridium simile Chaetosphaeriales This study
Gonytrichum erectum Chloridium caesium Chaetosphaeriales Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976)
Gonytrichum fulvum Gonytrichum fulvum Incertae sedis This study
Gonytrichum fuscum Chloridium caesium Chaetosphaeriales Réblová et al. (2016)
Gonytrichum gilvum Gonytrichum gilvum Incertae sedis Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976), this study
Gonytrichum indicum Chloridium pellucidum Chaetosphaeriales This study
Gonytrichum indicum Nom. inval., Arts 40.1, 40.3, Udaiyan (1991)
Gonytrichum luteo-viride Oidiodendron sp. Helotiales Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976)
Gonytrichum macrocladum var. macrocladum Chloridium fuscum Chaetosphaeriales Hughes (1951), this study
Gonytrichum macrocladum var. terricola Chloridium fuscum Chaetosphaeriales Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976)
Gonytrichum mirabile Chloridium mirabile Chaetosphaeriales Wu et al. (2022)
Gonytrichum rubrum Gonytrichum rubrum Incertae sedis Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976), this study
Gonytrichum ypsilosporum Chloridium ypsilosporum Chaetosphaeriales This study
Melanopsammella chloroconia Chloridium chloroconium Chaetosphaeriales Réblová et al. (2016)
Melanopsammella gonytrichii Chloridium fuscum Chaetosphaeriales Hughes (1951), this study
Melanopsammella inaequalis Chloridium caesium Chaetosphaeriales Réblová et al. (2016)
Melanopsammella preussii Melanopsammella preussii Incertae sedis Réblová et al. (1999)
Melanopsammella vermicularioides Chloridium virescens Chaetosphaeriales Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976)
Mesobotrys brachycladus Mesobotrys brachycladus Nom. inval., Art. 36.1a, c, Saccardo (1886)
Mesobotrys flavovirens Chloridium virescens Chaetosphaeriales Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976)
Mesobotrys fuscus var. brachycladusMesobotrys fuscus var. brachycladus Incertae sedis Saccardo (1886), this study
Mesobotrys fuscus var. fuscus Chloridium fuscum Chaetosphaeriales Hughes (1951), this study
Mesobotrys graminicola Lacellina graminicola Incertae sedis Hughes (1951)
Mesobotrys macrocladus Chloridium fuscum Chaetosphaeriales Hughes (1951), this study
Mesobotrys simplex Chloridium fuscum Chaetosphaeriales Hughes (1951), this study
Pseudophialocephala aquatica Chloridium aquaticum Chaetosphaeriales Wei et al. (2018), this study
Pseudophialocephala cuneata Chloridium cuneatum Chaetosphaeriales This study
Pseudophialocephala humicola Chloridium humicola Chaetosphaeriales Wei et al. (2022)
Pseudophialocephala salinicola cf. Cylindrotrichum Glomerellales This study
Pseudophialocephala terricola Chloridium costaricense Chaetosphaeriales This study
Pseudophialocephala xalapensis Chloridium humicola Chaetosphaeriales This study

Epitypification was considered for all known species which lack the type strain. In the end, only strains of Chl. fuscum and Chl. subglobosum were suitable for epitype selection. Strains of other species come from different countries and even continents than the holotypes and cannot be considered suitable candidates.

A specific mode of phialidic conidiogenesis occurs in all members of the genus Chloridium. The formation of conidia on multiple loci within the collarette represents a modification of phialidic conidiogenesis (Hammill 1972, Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976, Onofri et al. 1994). Two, usually unequally sized, successively formed conidia are often seen at the tip of the conidiogenous locus (Fig. 13A–D). The phialides extend percurrently, which is more pronounced in older cultures, giving the conidiophores a slightly geniculate appearance. The conidiogenous locus often protrudes beyond the collarette, even to several micrometres, and may also extend percurrently after each conidium bearing several minute annellations. The annellations are scarcely visible with a light microscope, preferably using phase contrast, as “closely-spaced progressive series of ring-like scars encircling the cell” (Seifert et al. 2011). The meristem remains active, and as the phialide repeatedly percurrently extends, clusters of conidia remain attached in place at the site of the original collarette and conidiogenous locus (Fig. 13E, M). The phialides are either terminal at the tip of the conidiophore or arise from metulae, or are discrete in whorls or solitary, lateral, producing conidia in heads or cirrhi (Fig. 13).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g013.jpg

Conidiogenesis, phialides and conidial formations in the genus Chloridium. A–D. Phialides with conidia borne on multiple conidiogenous loci. E. Conidiophores with conidial heads attached after each percurrent elongation of the phialide. F. Conidiophores with conidial heads and cirrhi. G, H. Phialides arranged in whorls, growing from collar-like hyphae. I. Phialides solitary or in pairs, with and without collar-like hyphae. J. Phialides growing from metulae at the tip of a penicillately branched conidiophore. K, L. Conidia adhering in cirrhi. M–O. Conidia adhering in heads. Scale bars: A–D = 5 μm; E = 100 μm; F = 200 μm; G–N = 10 μm; O = 50 μm.

Sections of Chloridium are characterised by a particular conidiophore morphotype (Fig. 14) that corresponds to the morphology of four hyphomycetous genera and includes simple and more complex forms named the chloridium-, gonytrichum-, phialocephala- and pseudogliomastix-types. Sometimes pairs of the conidiophore types occur together and form identical or nearly identical conidia. In each pair, a simple form (chloridium- or pseudogliomastix-type) of its more complex counterpart (gonytrichum- and phialocephala-type) is present. Because of their ontogeny, co-occurrence in nature, loss of the ability to form complex conidiophores in favour of simple ones, and identical conidia borne on these morphotypes (explained below, also see Discussion), we do not consider them synasexual morphs and prefer to use the term “conidiophore type”.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g014.jpg

Conidiophore types distinguished in the genus Chloridium. A, B. Chloridium-type. C–I. Gonytrichum-type. J. Phialocephala-type. K. Pseudogliomastix-type. Scale bars: A = 25 μm; B, J, K = 20 μm; C–I = 50 μm.

The chloridium-type conidiophores occur in all sections except Pseudophialocephala. Members of sections Chloridium, Cryptogonytrichum, and Metachloridium produce only this type of conidiophore. Whether the conidiophores form in one or two layers is considered a species-specific trait that can be observed especially on natural substrate. Conidiophores of the chloridium-type occur together with the gonytrichum-type in some species. In the section Mesobotrys, the chloridium-type conidiophores occur in culture as an early developmental stage, and soon, first collar-like hyphae are formed in the nodes. Similar in vitro observations were made in Chl. chloroconium (section Gonytrichopsis). Such ontogeny is challenging to observe on the natural material; we usually see solitary or caespitose chloridium-type conidiophores at the margin of the colony. After repeated in vitro transfers, the ability to form collar-like hyphae decreases and may even be absent, but it varies among species. The loss of this ability and formation of the chloridium-type conidiophores instead of the gonytrichum-type occurs in both varieties of Chl. chloridioides and was regularly observed in Chl. volubile and Chl. chloroconium (see also Barron & Bhatt 1967).

Species of the Gonytrichopsis, Gonytrichum, Mesobotrys, and Volubilia sections produce gonytrichum-type conidiophores. The collar-like (encircling) hyphae are borne below the septa of the central stalk and setae. At first, they appear as a hyaline to subhyaline outgrowth that enlarges, grows forward, and closely encircles the conidiophore as a collar. The septa develop later, and the collar-like hypha becomes pigmented. The phialides and setae are borne on the collar-like hyphae and not directly on the conidiophore. Thus, the conidiophore and setae are essentially unbranched. This concept was introduced by Hughes (1951) on the example of Chl. caesium, and is accepted in this study. However, there are a few exceptions. Chloridium mirabile is unique in that it lacks collar-like hyphae, or they occur infrequently. The discrete phialides and lateral setae are borne directly on the conidiophore; they have a broadly lobate base that encircles the conidiophore in the same way as a collar-like hypha. The conidiophores of the section Gonytrichum are one of the most complex structures in the genus Chloridium. Conidiophores and lateral setae are geniculate in the nodes; they grow in all directions, the collar-like hyphae form along their entire length, and the conidiophores assume an arborescent appearance (Fig. 14C–E). In other sections with the gonytrichum-type conidiophores, the geniculation at the nodes is absent or less pronounced, collar-like hyphae and setae form in the lower fertile part of the conidiophore, and the conidiophores are subulately tapering and point upwards in one direction (Fig. 14F–I).

Chlamydospores (Fig. 15) are found only in culture and can be used as a diagnostic marker to distinguish between sections and, to some extent, at the species level. They are solitary, in chains or irregular clusters on vegetative mycelium, and consistently present or absent in individual species.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g015.jpg

Chlamydospores in the genus Chloridium. A–C. Lateral, on stipe or sessile, sometimes intercalary. D. Intercalary in long chains. E, F. Intercalary, solitary or in short chains. G. Intercalary, in series or clusters. Scale bars: A–F = 10 μm; G = 5 μm.

Regarding growth at different temperatures, cardinal temperature values vary from species to species and represent a good tool for distinguishing the taxa of the genus Chloridium. The ability to distinguish all varieties within a species is remarkable. Optimum growth is between 20–30 °C, with frequent ability to grow also at 5 °C. Only two species show good growth at 37 °C (Chl. guttiferum and some isolates of Chl. bellum). Eight species were unable to grow at 30 °C. In general, Chloridium is mesophilic, with a good ability to tolerate lower temperatures (5 °C, 10 °C) and is less able to grow at temperatures above 37 °C. (Fig. 16, Table S4).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g016.jpg

Growth of Chloridium spp. at different temperatures (5–37 °C) on MEA after 14 d and their phylogenetic relationships.

Key to the sections

1a. Conidiophores unbranched ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2

1b. Conidiophores with a condensed branching system ............................................................................................................................................................... Pseudophialocephala

2a. Conidiophores lacking collar-like hyphae; phialides integrated, terminal ................................................................................................ 3

2b. Conidiophores with collar-like hyphae; phialides integrated, terminal and discrete, lateral ............................................................................................................................................................... 5

3a. Chlamydospores absent ............................................................................................................................................................... Cryptogonytrichum

3b. Chlamydospores present ............................................................................................................................................................... 4

4a. Conidia hyaline, sometimes pale brown in old material; conidiophores cylindrical; chlamydospores solitary, intercalary, lateral, terminal, rarely in short chains ............................................................................................................................................................... Chloridium

4b. Conidia pale brown; conidiophores subulately tapering; chlamydospores solitary, intercalary, sometimes lateral, with age arranged in long chains or clusters ............................................................................................................................................................... Metachloridium

5a. Collar-like hyphae formed along the entire length of the conidiophore and setae, which become geniculate; conidiophores cylindrical, assuming an arborescent appearance; chlamydospores absent ............................................................................................................................................................... Gonytrichum

5b. Collar-like hyphae formed in the lower fertile part of the conidiophore; conidiophores are subulately tapering and point upwards in one direction ............................................................................................................................................................... 6

6a. Chlamydospores absent ............................................................................................................................................................... Mesobotrys

6b. Chlamydospores present ............................................................................................................................................................... 7

7a. Chlamydospores abundant, in conspicuous series and clusters ............................................................................................................................................................... Gonytrichopsis

7b. Chlamydospores rare, solitary ............................................................................................................................................................... Volubilia

Chloridium section Chloridium Link

Type species: Chloridium virescens (Pers.) W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.

Description: Colonies effuse, hairy, brown, becoming whitish, green to yellow-green, yellow, beige, olivaceous grey or amber when sporulating; composed of conidiophores and ascomata. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores produced in one or two layers, solitary, scattered, crowded or caespitose, unbranched, but sometimes branched in culture, often with percurrent proliferations, brown, cylindrical, slightly tapering apically. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, terminal, integrated, extending percurrently, occasionally sympodially in culture, paler than the conidiophore; collarettes flaring, shortly funnel-shaped, inconspicuous. Conidia ellipsoidal, ellipsoidal-oblong, subglobose, obovate, suballantoid, hyaline, occasionally turn pale brown in older cultures, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in heads or cirrhi. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores absent. Chlamydospores present, they are lateral, terminal or intercalary, aseptate, brown, thick-walled, smooth. Sexual morph. Ascomata perithecial, non-stromatic, superficial, glabrous or setose; setae always sterile, acute. Ostiole periphysate. Paraphyses present, disintegrating with age. Asci unitunicate, stipitate, with a non-amyloid apical annulus. Ascospores fragmenting within the ascus, fusiform, hyaline, 1-septate, finely verrucose.

Notes: The section Chloridium comprises 19 species and varieties. Because of their extensive morphological homoplasy, especially in culture, and lack of data from nature, a synoptic table with salient features of each species is provided (Table 4).

Table 4.

A synopsis table of Chloridium section Chloridium.

Taxon Growth1 Ascomata, asci, part spores Size2 Conidiophores SizePhialides SizeConidia Size Shape Colour Colour in aged material Formation3 Colour in mass Chlamydospores4 Position on vegetative hyphae Ref. 5
Chloridium bellum var. bellumCunknown67–278(–330) × 2.5–3.512–29 × 2.5–33.5–5 × 2–3ellipsoidal to slightly obovatehyalinehyalineH / CwhitishI / L / T1
Chloridium bellum var. luteumCunknown60–182 × 2.5–4.515–30(–37) × 2.5–33.5–5 × (2–)2.5–3ellipsoidal to obovatehyalinepale brownH / Cwhitish (CMD, MLA, PCA), yellow to dark yellow (OA)L / T / I1
Chloridium biforme NSascomata glabrous, asci 74.5–88.5 × (4.5–)5.5–6.5, part spores 4–5.5 × 2.5–3.5, verrucose67–134 × 2.5–510.5–20(–24) × 2.5–3.5(–4)4.5–5.5 × 2.5–3.5ellipsoidalhyalinehyalineH / CwhitishL / T1
Cnot observed43–141(–260) × 3–4.520.5–26.5 × 2.5–3.5(3–)3.5–4.5 × 2–2.5broadly ellipsoidal, suballantoidhyalinehyalineHwhitish to white-yellowL / T1
Chloridium caudigerum NSascomata setose, asci (70–)74.5–84.5 × (5–)5.5–6.5, part spores 4–5.5 × 2.5–3.5, verrucose(60–)108–170(–235) × 3.5–4.518–28 × 3–43.5–4.5(–5) × 2.5–3ellipsoidal to oblonghyalinepale brownH / Cwhitish to white-yellow headsL / I / T1
Cnot observed118–384(–430) × 3–3.520–26.5 × 2.5–33.5–4.5(–5) × 2.5–3ellipsoidal to oblong, occasionally truncate at basehyalinehyalineHwhitish (CMD, PCA), yellowish to olivaceous yellow (MLA, OA)T / L / I1
Chloridium chlamydosporum Cunknown43–164(–245) × 2.5–3.5(–4.5)(6.5–)10–34 × 2.5–3.53.5–5 × 2–3obovate to ellipsoidal-obovatehyalinepale brownHwhitishL / T / I1
Chloridium crousii NSunknown40–65 × 2–320–25 × 2–2.52.8–3.2 × 2.5–2.8oblong to ellipsoidalhyalinehyalineCn/aabsent2
Chloridium detriticola var. detriticolaCunknown72–162 × 3–417.5–38 × 2.5–3.5(4–)4.5–5.5 × (2.5–)3–3.5obovate to ellipsoidal-obovatehyalinepale brownHwhitishL / T / I1
Chloridium detriticola var. effusumNSunknown114–218 × 3.5–4.510–29 × 2.5–3.54–5 × 2.5–3.5obovate to oblong-obovatehyalinepale brownHwhitishabsent1
Cunknown58–115 × 3–4.516–39 × 3–3.5(4–)4.5–5.5 × 2.5–3obovate to ellipsoidal-obovatehyalinehyalineHL / T / I1
Chloridium gamsii Cunknown34–140 × 2.5–3.516–25 × 2–33.5–4.5 × 2.5–3subglobose to ellipsoidal, to somewhat obovatehyalinehyalineH / Cwhitish to white-yellowL / T / I1
Chloridium guttiferum Cunknown80–314(–377) × 2.5–3.515.5–27 × 2.5–3(3–)3.5–4.5 × (2–)2.5–3ellipsoidal to obovatehyalinehyalineHolivaceous to olivaceous greyI / L1
Chloridium jilinense NSn/a110–150 × 2.3–2.620–26 × 3–3.54–5 × 2.5–3ellipsoidal, irregularly shapedhyalinehyalineHn/aT / L / I2
Chloridium kirkii NSn/a22–65 × 2–2.520–25 × 2–2.33–3.5 × 2–2.5oblong to ellipsoidalhyalinehyalineHn/aL / I2
Chloridium moratum Cn/a30–120 × 2.5–416–35 × 2.5–4(3.5–)4–5 × 2.5–3.5irregularly ellipsoidal to subglobose to slightly obovate with a truncate basehyalinepale brownH / CwhitishI chains / T / L1
Chloridium peruense Cunknown74–175 × 2.5–318–25 × 2.5–33–4 × 2–2.5obovate to ellipsoidal-obovatehyalinehyalineHwhitishL / T / I1
Chloridium proliferatum NSunknown35–115 × 1.5–315–30 × 1.5–2.52.5–3.5 × 1.5–2ellipsoidal, base truncatepale brownpale brownCn/aabsent2
Chloridium setosum NSunknown50–137 × 2–3.713–16 × 2.5–33–3.8 × 2–2.5ellipsoidal, subglobosehyalinehyalineCyellowabsent2
Cunknown50–206 × 2–310–25 × 2.5–3.53–4.5 × 2–3ellipsoidal to subglobosehyalinehyalineH / Cyellow-white to olivaceous (PCA), whitish (MLA, OA)T / L / I1
Chloridium tropicale NSunknown70–110 × 2.5–3.530–40 × 3–43.5–5 × 1.8–2oblong to ellipsoidal, straight or slightly curvedhyalinehyalineH / Cn/an/a2
Chloridium virescens NSascomata glabrous, asci 70–81.5(–86) × 5.5–6.5(–7), part spores 4–5(–5.5) × 2.5–3, verrucose48–180 × 2–412–14(–23) × 2.5–32.5–3.5 × 2–2.5subglobose, occasionally ellipsoidalhyalinehyalineH / Cwhitish, yellow-green or grass-greenn/a1
Cnot observed80–253 × 3–411–24.5 × 2.5–3.52.5–4(–4.5) × 2–2.5(–3)subglobose to ellipsoidal, occasionally ellipsoidal-oblonghyalinehyalineH / Cwhitish to white-greenI chains / L / T1
Chloridium xishuangbannaense NSunknown35–50(–70) × 3.5–325–27 × 2.5–33.8–5 × 2.2–2.4ellipsoidal, oblonghyalinehyalineHn/an/a2

1 Growth: (NS) on natural substrate, (C) in culture.

2 Size is given in μm.

3 Formation H/C: (H) head, (C) cirrhi.

4 Position: (I) intercalary, (L) lateral, (T) terminal. The order of letters indicates the frequency of the position; the most frequent position is given in bold.

5 References: (1) This study, (2) Wu & Diao (2022).

(n/a) character not available.

Chloridium bellum var. bellum Réblová & Hern.-Restr., sp. nov. MycoBank MB 846081. Fig. 17, ,1818.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g017.jpg

Chloridium bellum var. bellum. A–C. Colonies. D–G. Conidiophores. H. Conidia. I. Chlamydospores. A–I. On CMA with Urtica stems. Images: A, C, D, E. CBS 127310; B, F–I. CBS 709.73A. Scale bars: A = 500 μm; B, C = 250 μm; D, E, I = 20 μm; F–H = 10 μm.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g018.jpg

Diversity of colony morphology in Chl. bellum on CMD, MLA, OA, PCA after 4 wk. A–C. Chl. bellum var. bellum (A. CBS 709.73A; B. CBS 709.73B; C. CBS 127310). D. Chl. bellum var. luteum CBS 141.54. Scale bar = 1 cm.

Etymology: Bellus (Latin) beautiful, pretty, referring to the lovely long conidial cirrhi.

Typus: Germany, Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel-Kitzeberg, isolated from wheat-field soil, date unknown, W. Gams No. C 339 (holotype CBS H-25016, culture ex-type CBS 709.73A).

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 62–64 mm diam, circular, flat, entire, velvety becoming mucoid, cobwebby at the margin, beige-brown, darker at the margin, with white zones of aerial mycelium, reverse of the same colour. On MLA: colonies 75–77 mm diam, circular, slightly raised centrally, flat margin, margin entire, velvety to cobwebby, locally mucoid, deeply furrowed, zonate, grey to beige grey centrally, olivaceous brown at the mucoid spots, cinnamon-brown towards the margin, reverse olivaceous grey to brown. On OA: colonies 84–85 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, cobwebby, sometimes with irregular mucoid zones, dark grey brown with white grey conidial masses, olivaceous grey to brown at the margin, reverse black. On PCA: colonies 77–80 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, velvety, cobwebby to mucoid towards the margin, olivaceous black, locally whitish beige due to conidial masses, reverse of the same colour. Sporulation was absent on CMD, abundant on MLA, OA and PCA. Growth at 5–37 °C with an optimum at 30 °C.

Description in culture: On MLA, vegetative hyphae 1.5–3.5 μm diam, branched, septate, hyaline and smooth, becoming pale brown and encrusted. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores 67–278(–330) × 2.5–3.5 μm, macronematous, solitary, erect, unbranched, commonly with 3–6 percurrent proliferations, and with up to 15 proliferations in older cultures (>8 wk) assuming a conspicuously geniculate appearance, cylindrical, straight or flexuous, brown. Conidiogenous cells 12–29 × 2.5–3 μm, tapering to 1.5–2 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, subcylindrical to lageniform, integrated, terminal, pale brown to subhyaline, paler towards the apex, extending percurrently, collarettes 2.5–4 μm wide, 1.5–2 μm deep, flaring, pale brown to subhyaline. Conidia 3.5–5 × 2–3 μm (mean ± SD = 4.3 ± 0.4 × 2.4 ± 0.2 μm), ellipsoidal to slightly obovate, hyaline, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in slimy whitish heads and cirrhi. Chlamydospores 4.5–7.5 × 3.5–4.5 μm, intercalary or lateral, sessile or on a short stalk, sometimes terminal, subglobose, ellipsoidal or pyriform, truncate at the base, brown, thick-walled, smooth, with age becoming verrucose. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Additional specimens examined: Germany, Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel-Kitzeberg, isolated from wheat-field soil, date unknown, W. Gams No. C 773 (CBS 709.73B). USA, Kansas, isolated from soil, date unknown, collector unknown (CBS 127310).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe in soil, known from Germany and USA. According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 2 549 samples from 97 studies, collected primarily in forest soil (topsoil, bulk soil, and rhizosphere soil), croplands and grasslands on all continents. The species is typical of temperate, subtropical, or tropical climatic regions but is almost absent in the boreal and tundra regions of Europe and North America (MAT 13.1 °C, MAP 1 114 mm).

Notes: The Chl. bellum clade (79/1.0) comprises four strains; three strains isolated from soil and identified initially as Chl. virescens var. caudigerum (CBS 141.54, CBS 709.73A, CBS 709.73B) (Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976), and Chl. virescens var. virescens (CBS 127310). Chloridium bellum has two incarnations, var. bellum and var. luteum, whose identity inside the single species, Chl. bellum, was demonstrated by STACEY analysis. The subclade containing three isolates (CBS 709.73A, CBS 709.73B, CBS 127310) that originate from the northern temperate zone (Germany, USA) represents the type variety. The conidia of var. bellum adhere predominantly in heads, occasionally in cirrhi that form only in older cultures (>8 wk). Conidial clusters are whitish to white grey in mass on all four media and have longer conidiophores that are typically geniculate due to frequent percurrent elongation of the phialides. The chlamydospores are slightly narrower. The lineage represented by the strain CBS 141.54 from Central Africa (Democratic Republic of the Congo) is described as var. luteum. It differs from var. bellum in shorter conidiophores and conidia that are dark yellow in the mass on OA and change to amber in older cultures (>12 wk) and produce a pale yellow soluble pigment on MLA.

Although the two groups of strains have similar colony morphology and may be difficult to distinguish in culture, traits such as the cardinal temperatures and growth optima, the colour of the conidia in the mass and their preferred mode of clustering, the conspicuous elongation of the conidiophores in vitro and genetic divergence in the two coding loci justify their distinction as varieties.

Chloridium bellum is characterised by simple conidiophores with ellipsoidal to slightly obovate conidia adhering in heads or cirrhi and mostly lateral or terminal chlamydospores. Chloridium setosum is similar to Chl. bellum but differs in shorter, ellipsoidal to subglobose conidia, branched conidiophores (in culture), and colony characteristics with mostly dark cinnamon or chestnut brown tones.

Chloridium bellum var. luteum Réblová & Hern.-Restr., var. nov. MycoBank MB 846706. Fig. 18, ,1919.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g019.jpg

Chloridium bellum var. luteum (CBS 141.54). A, B. Colonies. C–H. Conidiophores. I–K. Conidia arranged in cirrhus (I). L–N. Chlamydospores. A, B. On MLA. C–N. On PCA. Scale bars: A = 250 μm; B = 100 μm; C, L–N = 20 μm; D–K = 10 μm.

Etymology: Luteus (Latin) yellow, referring to the yellow pigment diffusing in the agar and the yellow colour of the conidia in the mass.

Typus: Democratic Republic of the Congo, Yangambi, isolated from soil, date unknown, J.A. Meyer No. 4747 (holotype CBS H-10170, culture ex-type CBS 141.54 = MUCL 15746).

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 56–64 mm diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, smooth, mucoid, locally cobwebby, colony centre yellowish-beige, pale brown towards the margin, reverse pale brown. On MLA: colonies 76–77 mm diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, mucoid centrally, cobwebby to velvety-lanose towards the periphery, beige grey, yellowish grey at the centre, cinnamon brown to grey-brown towards the margin, pale yellow pigment diffusing into the surrounding agar, reverse olivaceous brown. On OA: colonies 84–86 mm diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, cobwebby, farinose when sporulating, olivaceous yellow due to conidial masses, dark grey to almost black at the margin, reverse dark grey. On PCA: colonies 80–82 mm diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, farinose when sporulating, beige due to conidial masses, dark brown towards the periphery, reverse dark chocolate brown. Sporulation was abundant on all media, delayed after 12 wk on CMD. Growth at 10–30 °C with an optimum at 25 °C.

Description in culture: On PCA, vegetative hyphae 1.5–3.5 μm diam, branched, septate, often adhering in aerial strands, hyaline, smooth, later pale brown and encrusted. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores 60–182 × 2.5–4.5 μm, macronematous, solitary, erect, unbranched, commonly with 1–4 percurrent proliferations, cylindrical to somewhat subulately tapering upwards, straight or flexuous, brown, darker near the base, gradually paler towards the apex. Conidiogenous cells 15–30(–37) × 2.5–3 μm, tapering to 1.5–2 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, subcylindrical to lageniform, integrated, terminal, pale brown to subhyaline, paler towards the apex, extending percurrently; collarettes 2–3 μm wide, ca. 1.5 μm deep, subhyaline, flaring, shortly funnel-shaped. Conidia 3.5–5 × (2–)2.5–3 μm (mean ± SD = 4.3 ± 0.4 × 2.5 ± 0.2 μm), ellipsoidal to obovate, hyaline becoming pale brown upon ageing, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in slimy heads and cirrhi, conidia in mass whitish to white grey (CMD, MLA, and PCA), becoming olivaceous grey (MLA), or yellow to dark yellow turning to amber (OA), especially in older cultures (>12 wk). Chlamydospores 5–8 × 4–5 μm, lateral, sessile or on a stalk, or terminal, seldom intercalary, ellipsoidal, subglobose or pyriform, truncate at the base, brown, thick-walled, smooth becoming verrucose with age. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe in soil from the Democratic Republic of the Congo. According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 842 samples from 33 studies, collected mainly in forest soil (topsoil, bulk soil, and rhizosphere soil), croplands and grasslands on all continents except Antarctica. It typically occurs in temperate, subtropical, or tropical climatic regions but is almost absent in the boreal and tundra regions of Europe and North America (MAT 16.5 °C, MAP 1 161). Its distribution overlaps with Chl. bellum var. bellum.

Notes: Chloridium bellum var. luteum produces conidia accumulating mainly in the cirrhi in vitro. A distinctive feature is yellow to the dark yellow colour of conidia in the mass on OA. For comparison with the var. bellum, see notes in the latter taxon. Among other taxa, Chl. bellum var. luteum, together with Chl. guttiferum, is unique in its ability to grow at 37 °C.

Chloridium biforme Réblová & Hern.-Restr., sp. nov. MycoBank MB 846707. Fig 20.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g020.jpg

Chloridium biforme (ICMP 23429). A. Ascomata with conidiophores. B. Colony. C, D. Asci. E. Ascospores. F, G, N. Conidiophores. H–K. Conidia. L. Tip of the phialide. M. Chlamydospores. O. Colonies on CMD, MLA, OA, PCA (from left to right) after 4 wk. A–E, G. From nature. F, H–J, L. On MLA. K. On CMA with Urtica stems. M, N. On PCA. Scale bars: A, B = 250 μm; C–E, H–K = 10 μm; F, G, M, N = 20 μm; L = 5 μm; O = 1 cm.

Etymology: Bifôrmis (Latin) having two forms, referring to the conidiophores and ascomata that occur together on a natural substrate.

Typus: New Zealand, Southland Region, Fiordland National Park, Lake Monowai 40 km S of Manapouri, Borland Nature Walk, on decaying wood of Nothofagus sp., 9 Mar. 2005, M. Réblová M.R. 3173/ NZ 422 (holotype PDD 120397, culture ex-type ICMP 23429).

Description on the natural substrate: Colonies effuse, hairy, dark brown, white grey when sporulating; composed of conidiophores and ascomata. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores 67–134 × 2.5–5 μm, macronematous, solitary, growing on ascomata or nearby wood, erect, straight, unbranched, with 1–3 percurrent proliferations, cylindrical, slightly tapering upwards, septate, brown, paler towards the apex. Conidiogenous cells 10.5–20(–24) × 2.5–3.5(–4) μm, tapering to 2–2.5 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, integrated, terminal, extending percurrently, subcylindrical to lageniform, subhyaline, pale brown at the base; collarettes 3.5–4 μm wide and 1.5–2 μm deep, hyaline, flaring, shortly funnel-shaped. Conidia 4.5–5.5 × 2.5–3.5 μm (mean ± SD = 4.9 ± 0.5 × 3.0 ± 0.2 μm), ellipsoidal, hyaline, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in whitish heads and cirrhi. Sexual morph. Ascomata 186–220 μm diam, 200–250 μm high, non-stromatic, superficial, solitary or aggregated, subglobose to conical, papillate, dark brown to black, glabrous, glossy. Ostiole periphysate. Ascomatal wall 29–36 μm thick, fragile, carbonaceous, two-layered. An outer layer consisting of brown, more or less polyhedral cells with opaque walls. An inner layer composed of several rows of elongated, thin-walled, hyaline cells. Paraphyses 2.5–4 μm, septate, branched, longer than the asci, disintegrating with age. Asci 74.5–88.5 × (4.5–)5.5–6.5 μm (mean ± SD = 80.7 ± 5 × 66.9 ± 4.3 μm), cylindrical-clavate, stipitate, ascal apex obtuse to broadly rounded with a non-amyloid apical annulus ca. 2 μm wide, 1.5 μm high. Ascospores easily fragmenting within the ascus, part spores 4–5.5 × 2.5–3.5 μm (mean ± SD = 4.7 ± 0.4 × 2.8 ± 0.2 μm), fusiform, slightly asymmetrical, the upper half is slightly shorter and wider, hyaline, 1-septate, finely verrucose, obliquely uniseriate or 1–2-seriate in the ascus.

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 46–48 mm diam, circular, slightly raised, margin fimbriate, cobwebby, floccose, somewhat zonate, creamy, with grey-brown centre and irregular pigmented zones due to chlamydospore production, reverse beige. On MLA: colonies 36–40 mm diam, circular, raised, margin entire to weakly fimbriate, velvety-lanose, deeply furrowed, brown grey, whitish at the margin with a beige-ochre outer zone of submerged growth, reverse olivaceous beige. On OA: colonies 48–55 mm diam, flat, margin entire, cobwebby to mucoid, zonate, grey-isabelline, centre brown, with circular olivaceous zones, with colourless droplets of the exudate, reverse olivaceous grey. On PCA: colonies 52–53 mm diam, circular, slightly convex, margin lobate, lanose, cobwebby at the margin, cinnamon brown, olivaceous brown at the margin, with an outer milky zone of submerged growth, reverse brown. Sporulation was abundant on all media. Growth at 5–25 °C with an optimum at 25 °C.

Description in culture: On MLA, vegetative hyphae 1.5–2.5 μm diam, branched, septate, hyaline to subhyaline, smooth, later pale brown and encrusted. Asexual morph. Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, and conidia are similar to those from nature. The chloridium-type conidiophores 43–141(–260) × 3–4.5 μm, with up to eight percurrent proliferations. Conidiogenous cells 20.5–26.5 × 2.5–3.5 μm, tapering to 1.5–2 μm below the collarette, conidiogenous locus protruding 3–4.5 μm above the collarette; collarettes 3–3.5 μm wide and 1–1.5 μm deep, subhyaline, inconspicuous. Conidia (3–)3.5–4.5 × 2–2.5 μm (mean ± SD = 3.9 ± 0.3 × 2.3 ± 0.1 μm), broadly ellipsoidal to suballantoid, hyaline, accumulating in whitish or white-yellow slimy heads that turn olivaceous grey in older cultures (>12 wk). Chlamydospores 4–6 × 3.5–5 μm, usually lateral on stipe or terminal, subglobose, ellipsoidal, brown, smooth, thick-walled. Sexual morph. Not observed.

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe on decaying wood of Nothofagus sp., known from New Zealand. According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 58 samples from three studies, originating from soil and roots from forest, cropland, shrubland, and grassland biomes in Australasia. It occurs in locations of temperate or xeric climate (MAT 11.6 °C, MAP 1 051 mm). Chloridium biforme is one of the few species with a limited distribution range.

Notes: The shape of conidia in culture can vary from broadly ellipsoidal to suballantoidal; suballantoidal shapes predominating on CMA. Chloridium biforme is similar to Chl. virescens in characters of ascomata, asci, and ascospores, but is well distinguished by a single layer of conidiophores and conidia arranged in short whitish cirrhi and sometimes heads.

Chloridium caudigerum (Höhn.) S. Hughes, Canad. J. Bot. 36: 748. 1958. Fig. 21, ,2222.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g021.jpg

Chloridium caudigerum. A, B. Colonies composed of ascomata and conidiophores. C. Asci. D. Ascospores. E. Seta. F, G. Conidia. H–J, P. Conidiophores. K, L. Upper parts of conidiophores with percurrently elongating phialides (arrows indicate elongated parts of phialides with active meristem and visible annellations). M–O. Chlamydospores. A–F, H, I. From nature. G, J–L, P. On MLA. M–O. On CMD. Images: A, C–E, J–O. ICMP 22547; B, F. CBS 138691. G, P. CBS 248.75; H, I. CBS 145490. Scale bars: A, B = 250 μm; C–G, M–O = 10 μm; H–L, P = 20 μm.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g022.jpg

Diversity of colony morphology in Chl. caudigerum on CMD, MLA, OA, PCA after 4 wk. A. CBS 248.75. B. CBS 675.74. C. CBS 146196. D. CBS 145489. E. ICMP 22547. Scale bar = 1 cm.

Basionym: Cirrhomyces caudiger Höhn. [as ‘caudigerus’], Ann. Mycol. 1: 529. 1903.

Synonyms: Chloridium virescens var. caudigerum (Höhn.) W. Gams & Hol.-Jech., Stud. Mycol. 13: 19. 1976.

Botryonipha capillamentosa (Preuss) Kuntze, Revis. Gen. Pl. 2: 845. 1891.

Stilbella capillamentosa (Preuss) Lindau, Rabenh. Krypt.-Fl. 1(9): 292. 1908.

? Stilbum capillamentosum Preuss, Linnaea 24: 132. 1851.

Sphaeromycetella leucocephala Arnaud, Bull. Trimestriel Soc. Mycol. France 69: 274. 1953. (Nom. inval. Art. 36).

Synonymy was adopted after Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976).

Description on the natural substrate: Colonies effuse, brown to black, white grey when sporulating; composed of conidiophores and ascomata. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores (60–)108–170(–235) × 3.5–4.5 μm, macronematous, solitary, crowded or in groups, erect, straight, occasionally slightly bent, septate, unbranched, with 1–3 percurrent proliferations, cylindrical, base bulbous, brown, paler towards the apex. Conidiogenous cells 18–28 × 3–4 μm, tapering to 2–2.5 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, integrated, terminal, extending percurrently, subcylindrical to lageniform, pale brown to subhyaline; collarettes 3.5–4 μm wide and 1.5(–2) μm deep, subhyaline, flaring, short funnel-shaped. Conidia 3.5–4.5(–5) × 2.5–3 μm (mean ± SD = 4.0 ± 0.4 × 2.3 ± 0.1 μm), ellipsoidal to oblong, hyaline, ageing conidia turn pale brown, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in slimy whitish to white-yellow heads or cirrhi. Sexual morph. Ascomata 150–190 μm diam, 165–200 μm high, non-stromatic, superficial, subglobose, papillate, dark brown, setose, often covered with conidiophores; setae 24–66 × 2–2.5 μm, brown, septate, acute, always sterile. Ostiole periphysate. Ascomatal wall 25–30 μm thick, fragile, carbonaceous, two-layered. An outer layer consisting of brown, more or less polyhedral cells with opaque walls. An inner layer composed of several rows of elongated, thin-walled, hyaline cells. Paraphyses 1.5–3.5 μm wide, septate, branched, longer than the asci, disintegrating with age. Asci (70–)74.5–84.5 × (5–)5.5–6.5 μm (mean ± SD = 77.3 ± 4.8 × 5.9 ± 0.5 μm), cylindrical-clavate, short-stipitate, ascal apex obtuse to broadly rounded with a non-amyloid apical annulus ca. 1.5–2 μm wide, 1–1.5 μm high. Ascospores fragmenting within the ascus (but somewhat less easily than in other Chloridium species), part spores 4–5.5 × 2.5–3.5 μm (mean ± SD = 4.7 ± 0.4 × 3.1 ± 0.2 μm), fusiform, slightly asymmetrical with the upper part slightly shorter or almost symmetrical, hyaline, 1-septate, finely verrucose, obliquely uniseriate in the ascus.

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 48–50 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire to weakly fimbriate, velvety to cobwebby, mucoid towards the margin, brown, beige centrally, sometimes with whitish outer zone, reverse brown. On MLA: colonies 36–38 mm diam, circular, convex centrally, flat margin, margin entire, velvety-lanose, somewhat floccose, furrowed, cobwebby to mucoid at the margin, ash grey to beige-brown at the centre, brown towards the periphery, olivaceous brown at the margin, reverse olivaceous brown. On OA: colonies 65–70 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire to undulate, cobwebby to sparsely velvety with irregular smooth and mucoid spots, beige, colony centre olivaceous yellow when sporulating, becoming brown, dark brown to dark grey towards the periphery, reverse brown. On PCA: colonies 52–66 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire to fimbriate, velvety, seldom smooth and mucoid towards the periphery, beige-brown, dark brown towards the margin, with a beige outer zone of submerged growth, reverse brown. Sporulation was absent on CMD, abundant on MLA, OA, and PCA. Growth at 5–30 °C with an optimum at 25 °C.

Description in culture: On MLA, vegetative hyphae 1.5–3 μm diam, branched, septate, hyaline, smooth, becoming pale brown, encrusted. Asexual morph. Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia are similar to those from nature. The chloridium-type conidiophores 118–384(–430) × 3–3.5 μm, with up to 10 percurrent proliferations. Conidiogenous cells 20–26.5 × 2.5–3 μm, tapering to 1.5–2 μm below the collarette, conidiogenous locus protruding 1.5–2.5 μm above the collarette, in places where the meristem remains active after regeneration of the phialide additional minute annellations are formed intercalary; collarettes 3.5–4 μm wide and 1–1.5 μm deep, subhyaline to pale brown, flaring, inconspicuous. Conidia 3.5–4.5(–5) × 2.5–3 μm (mean ± SD = 4.2 ± 0.4 × 2.3 ± 0.2 μm), ellipsoidal to oblong, occasionally some conidia slightly truncate at the base, hyaline, smooth, accumulating in slimy heads, whitish in mass (PCA, CMD) or becoming yellowish to olivaceous yellow (MLA, OA), especially in older cultures (>12 wk). Chlamydospores 5–6.5 × 4–4.5(–5) μm, terminal, lateral and intercalary, globose, subglobose or ellipsoidal, brown, thick-walled, smooth-walled, solitary, rarely in a chain of two or three. Sexual morph. Not observed.

Specimens examined: Austria, Wiener Wald, Gelber Berg, on decaying wood of Quercus sp., 29 May 1904, F. von Höhnel (neotype of Cirrhomyces caudiger FH 1552). Belgium, Ardennes, Le Roptai near Ave-et-Auffe, on decaying wood, Sep. 1975, W. Gams (CBS 601.75A); Ardennes, Grande Tinémont near Han-sur-Lesse, on decaying wood, Sep. 1975, W. Gams (CBS 621.75). Czech Republic, Central Bohemian Region, Úpor Forest near Mělník, on decaying wood of Populus nigra, 24 Jun. 1976, V. Holubová-Jechová (CBS 421.76); Pardubice Region, Železné hory Mts. Protected Landscape Area, Horní Bradlo, Malá Střítež settlement, Polom National Nature Reserve, alt. 600 m, on decaying wood of Acer pseudoplatanus, 10 Nov. 2018, M. Réblová M.R. 4069 (PRA-21331, CBS 145488); ibid., M.R. 4074 (PRA-21332, CBS 145489); ibid., on decaying wood of Fagus sylvatica, M.R. 4077 (PRA-21333, CBS 145490); South Moravian Region, Lanžhot, Ranšpurk National Nature Reserve, on decaying wood of Carpinus betulus, 26 Oct. 2018, M. Réblová M.R. 4010 (PRA-21334, CBS 145430); South Moravian Region, Valtice, Rendez-vous National Nature Monument, on decaying wood of Quercus cerris, 28 Oct. 2018, M. Réblová M.R. 4029 (PRA-21335, CBS 145432); ibid., M.R. 4035 (PRA-21336, CBS 145433); ibid., M.R. 4040A (CBS 146196); South Bohemian Region, Novohradské hory Mts., Dobrá voda, Hojná voda National Nature Reserve, on decaying wood of Fagus sylvatica, 13 Oct. 2003, M. Réblová M.R. 3819 (PRA-21337, CBS 138691). France, Plateau du Lubéron, on decaying wood of Cedrus atlantica, Oct. 1975, W. Gams (CBS 248.75); Arboretum Champenoux-Nancy, on decaying wood of Carya alba, Sep. 1974, W. Gams (CBS 675.74). New Zealand, Canterbury Region, Rangitata Orari Bridge Highway 79, Peel Forest ca. 23 km N of Geraldine, on decaying wood of Nothofagus sp., 6 Mar. 2005, M. Réblová M.R. 3165/NZ 412 (PDD 120398, ICMP 22547). Spain, Cantabria, San Pedro de Romeral, Collados de Ason Natural Park, on twig, 27 Sep. 2010, M. Hernández-Restrepo, J. Mena Portales & J. Guarro (FMR 11338 = IMI 500655); Castilla y Leon, Cerro de la Dehesa, isolated from soil, 9 Nov. 2010, M. Hernández-Restrepo & J. Gené (FMR 12411). The Netherlands, Utrecht Province, Baarn, Pijnenburg Forest, on decaying wood, Aug. 1972, W. Gams (CBS 263.76B).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe on decaying wood of Acer pseudoplatanus, Carpinus betulus, Carya alba, Cedrus atlantica, Fagus sylvatica, Nothofagus sp., Populus nigra, Quercus cerris, Quercus sp. and other unknown hosts. Chloridium caudigerum is a common species, it is known from Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, New Zealand, Spain, and the Netherlands (von Höhnel 1903, Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976, this study). According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 2 164 samples from 107 studies, collected mainly in soil (topsoil, bulk soil, and rhizosphere soil) but also commonly in the litter, deadwood, and roots. It is frequently found in forests, but unlike other species, also in cropland, shrubland, grassland, and wet habitats (wetland, freshwater, and marine habitats) in subtropical, temperate, cold humid, and boreal zones in Asia, Australasia, Europe and North America (Canada, USA) (MAT 6.9 °C, MAP 743 mm). It is absent in Central and South America and tropical parts of Asia.

Notes: Von Höhnel (1903) introduced Cirrhomyces caudiger as a fungus with effuse colonies and pigmented conidiophores in tufts bearing oblong conidia 3–4 × 1.5–2 μm in whitish cirrhi. Von Höhnel stated that the fungus is very common and may have already been described in the genera Acrotheca or Chloridium. Still, the short published diagnoses do not allow a closer comparison. Hughes (1958) noticed its resemblance to Chloridium and transferred C. caudiger to this genus. Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) revised the type material of C. caudiger, designated a neotype, and proposed a new combination Chl. virescens var. caudigerum for von Höhnel’s species, separating it from the type variety and var. chlamydosporum by whitish cirrhi and ellipsoidal, somewhat shorter conidia.

Our phylogenetic and morphological analyses of 10 of the 13 strains identified by Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) as Chl. virescens var. caudigerum showed a rich complex of several species; only one isolate represents Chl. caudigerum, while the others belong to five species and two varieties (Table 5). Revision of the neotype of C. caudiger FH 1552 revealed a fungus with conidiophores solitary or in groups 110–150 × 3–3.5 μm forming a single layer and ellipsoidal to oblong conidia accumulating in whitish heads, 3.5–4.5 × 2.5 μm, slightly larger than those given in the protologue (von Höhnel 1903).

Table 5.

Disposition of strains of Chloridium virescens var. caudigerum and var. chlamydosporum sensu Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) and their current classification.

Strain Name in Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) Current name
CBS 141.54Chloridium virescens var. caudigerumChloridium bellum var. luteum
CBS 152.53 Chloridium virescens
CBS 239.75C Chloridium chlamydosporum
CBS 263.76 Chloridium setosum
CBS 421.76 Chloridium caudigerum
CBS 424.76 Chloridium virescens
CBS 601.75B Chloridium virescens
CBS 667.75* Chloridium gamsii
CBS 709.73AChloridium bellum var. bellum
CBS 709.73BChloridium bellum var. bellum
CBS 114.41Chloridium virescens var. chlamydosporum Chloridium chlamydosporum
CBS 248.75 Chloridium caudigerum
CBS 345.67Chloridium detriticola var. detriticola
CBS 423.76 Chloridium chlamydosporum
CBS 581.73Chloridium detriticola var. detriticola
CBS 601.75A Chloridium caudigerum
CBS 601.75B Chloridium virescens
CBS 621.75 Chloridium caudigerum
CBS 675.74* Chloridium caudigerum
CBS 676.74* Chloridium virescens
CBS 916.73 Chloridium chlamydosporum

Note: Asterisk (*) indicates strains derived from ascospores of Chaetosphaeria vermicularioides sensu Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976).

Eighteen isolates that matched the description of C. caudiger formed a strongly supported monophyletic clade unrelated to Chl. virescens. Therefore, we propose to reinstate the species status of Chl. caudigerum (Hughes 1958). Chloridium caudigerum is characterised by simple, solitary, or caespitose conidiophores in a single layer and ellipsoidal to oblong conidia in slimy whitish to white-yellow heads or cirrhi on the natural substrate. In culture, conidia in mass on MLA and OA become yellowish to olivaceous yellow with age. Conidiophores contain many percurrent proliferations, making them much longer than on the natural substrate. The meristematic tip of the phialide remains active after the percurrent extension of the original phialide; the meristem becomes intercalary, and several minute annellations are formed (Fig. 21J–L). Our observations of fresh material revealed that conidial cirrhi are common only in some parts of the colony, while in other parts, conidia arranged in heads predominate. Similar observations were made in Chl. virescens; cirrhi formation is age-dependent and preceded by conidial heads (Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976, this study).

Chloridium caudigerum closely resembles Chl. chlamydosporum and Chl. virescens. Chloridium chlamydosporum differs in having obovate conidia, pale brown mycelium, and mostly lateral chlamydospores. Chloridium virescens differs from Chl. caudigerum in slightly shorter ellipsoidal to subglobose conidia that accumulate in grass-green to yellow-green cirrhi at maturity and conidiophores that form two distinct layers on the natural substrate, glabrous ascomata, and mostly intercalary chlamydospores and hyaline mycelium in culture.

The life cycle of Chl. caudigerum was experimentally verified in vitro in this study; the isolates derived from ascospores (CBS 138691, ICMP 22547) yielded conidiophores with conidia identical to those on the natural substrate. All collections of Chl. caudigerum are well comparable on the natural substrate. In culture, the isolates differed slightly in colony appearance, particularly in the intensity of the chlamydospore production (Fig. 22). Abundant aerial mycelium formed only on MLA; on other media, the aerial mycelium was often reduced, and colonies appeared sparsely velvety to cobwebby.

Chloridium chlamydosporum (J.F.H. Beyma) S. Hughes, Canad. J. Bot. 36: 748. 1958. Figs 2325.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g023.jpg

Chloridium chlamydosporum. A–C. Colonies. D–I. Conidiophores. J, K. Tip of the phialide. L–Q. Chlamydospores. R–U. Conidia. A, F–M, R–T. On PCA. B, C, U. On CMA with Urtica stems. D, E, N–Q. On MLA. Images: A, L, M. CBS 149052; B, C, U. CBS 149053; D, E, N–Q. ICMP 16193; F, G, J, T. CBS 149054; H, I, K. CBS 916.73; R. CBS 114.41; S. CBS 239.75C. Scale bars: A–C = 250 μm; D–I, L–S = 10 μm; J, K, T, U = 5 μm.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g025.jpg

Diversity of colony morphology in Chl. chlamydosporum on CMD, MLA, OA, PCA after 4 wk. A. CBS 423.76. B. CBS 916.73. C. CBS 239.75C. D. CBS 15193. Scale bar = 1 cm.

Basionym: Bisporomyces chlamydosporus J.F.H. Beyma [as ‘chlamydosporis’], Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 6: 277. 1940 [1939–40].

Synonym: Chloridium virescens var. chlamydosporum (J.F.H. Beyma) W. Gams & Hol.-Jech., Stud. Mycol. 13: 21. 1976.

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 55–56 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin entire, cobwebby to mucoid, whitish beige, pale brown towards the periphery, reverse brown. Rarely are colonies mucoid, smooth, and milky with reverse of the same colour. On MLA: colonies 82–83 mm in diam, circular, slightly raised, margin entire to fimbriate, velvety-lanose, floccose, funiculose, furrowed, zonate, pale olivaceous grey centrally, cinnamon brown to dark chocolate brown towards the periphery, sometimes pale yellow to pale ochre pigment diffusing into agar, reverse brown. On OA: colonies 69–70 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin entire, velvety to cobwebby, olivaceous grey, cinnamon to dark brown towards the margin, rarely ochre pigment diffusing into the agar, reverse brown. On PCA: colonies 64–67 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, velvety, cobwebby at the margin, white grey, cinnamon to dark brown towards the periphery, beige at the margin, reverse brown. Sporulation was abundant on all media. Growth at 5–30 °C with an optimum at 25–30 °C.

Description in culture: On PCA, vegetative hyphae 1.5–3 μm diam, branched, septate, hyaline to pale brown, smooth. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores 43–164(–245) × 2.5–3.5(–4.5) μm, macronematous, solitary, straight, unbranched, with none or 1–6 percurrent proliferations, septate, cylindrical or slightly tapering upwards, base somewhat bulbous, brown, paler towards the apex. Conidiogenous cells (6.5–)10–34 × 2.5–3.5 μm, tapering to 1.5–2.5 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, integrated, terminal, extending percurrently, cylindrical to subcylindrical, pale brown to subhyaline, conidiogenous locus protruding 2–6(–8) μm above the collarette; collarettes 2.5–3.5 μm wide and 1–2 μm deep, subhyaline to pale brown, flaring, funnel-shaped. Conidia 3.5–5 × 2–3 μm (mean ± SD = 4.1 ± 0.3 × 2.5 ± 0.2 μm), obovate to ellipsoidal-obovate, hyaline, pale brown upon ageing, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in slimy whitish heads, becoming beige to pale olivaceous in mass, especially in older cultures (>8 wk). Chlamydospores 4–6(–7) × 4–5 μm, mostly lateral, sessile or on a short stalk, sometimes terminal, seldom intercalary, solitary or in short chains of two cells, globose, subglobose, pyriform or ellipsoidal, brown, thick-walled, smooth. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Specimens examined: Chile, locality unknown, volcanic ash soil, date unknown, J. Grinbergs No. 526/73 (CBS 916.73). Czech Republic, Central Bohemian Region, Lánská obora near Rakovník, on the wood of Quercus petraea, 12 Jun. 1976, V. Holubová-Jechová (CBS 423.76). France, Forêt Senart, isolated from forest soil, date unknown, O. Reisinger (CBS 239.75C). New Zealand, Bay of Plenty Region, Waihi Beach, on dead wood in the broadleaved forest, 9 May 2003, J.A. Cooper JAC8645 (PDD 79986, ICMP 15193). The Netherlands, Utrecht Province, Baarn, isolated from soil, date unknown, J.F.H. van Beyma (holotype of Bisporomyces chlamydosporus CBS H-6914, culture ex-type CBS 114.41 = MUCL 10050); Gelderland Province, Meeuwenkampje, isolated from soil, 9 Jun. 2021, F. ten Hoove (CBS 149054 = SPC122.7); ibid., (CBS 149053 = SPC122.24A); ibid., (CBS 149052 = SPC122.18).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Chloridium chlamydosporum dwells mainly in the soil, but it can also inhabit decaying wood of Quercus petraea and other unidentified hosts or needles of Abies firma. It is known from Chile, Czech Republic, Japan, France, New Zealand, and the Netherlands (van Beyma 1940, Matsushima 1975, Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976, Iwamoto & Tokumasu 2001, this study). According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 1 666 samples from 72 studies, collected primarily in bulk and topsoil but also commonly in deadwood, litter, shoots, and roots. Most samples came from forest, woodland, cropland, shrubland, grassland, desert, and anthropogenic habitats. It is common across the globe (except Antarctica) but absent in some well-sampled areas (Spain, Scandinavia, and Western USA) and is relatively rare in South America. Interestingly, this species was also absent in France, which is well-sampled, although one of the collections examined by us came from that country. It was usually found in temperate, continental humid, tropical, and drier climates but was absent in the boreal zone (MAT 12.6 °C, MAP 1 241 mm).

Notes: Thirteen morphologically similar strains, some of which were initially identified as Chl. virescens var. chlamydosporum (Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976) formed a strongly supported monophylum distantly related to Chl. virescens. Based on these results, the species status of Chl. chlamydosporum is reinstated. The variability of the species complex centred on the ex-type strain of Chl. chlamydosporum CBS 114.41 was assessed by STACEY analysis, ML/BI phylogeny of four markers, analysis of the secondary structure of ITS (Figs 3, ,8,8, ,11),11), and comparative morphology. Chloridium chlamydosporum species complex was divided into three lineages, whose representatives differ mainly in conidial features and the number of nucleotides and WC base pairs in the first helix of the ITS1 molecule. These lineages are proposed here as three species and two varieties, i.e. Chl. chlamydosporum (conidia 3.5–5 × 2–3 μm; 175–176 nt in ITS1), Chl. detriticola var. detriticola (conidia (4–)4.5–5.5 × (2.5–)3–3.5 μm; 165 nt in ITS1), Chl. detriticola var. effusum (conidia (4–)4.5–5.5 × 2.5–3 μm; 152 nt in ITS1), and Chl. peruense (3–4 × 2–2.5 μm; 164 nt in ITS1). All lineages can also be distinguished by cardinal growth temperatures (Fig. 16, Table S4) and particularly by biogeography. Chloridium detriticola var. detriticola and var. effusum are outstanding by their occurrence in the boreal climatic zone, Chl. peruense by its common distribution in the tropics of Central and South America.

Chloridium chlamydosporum is characterised by solitary, brown, unbranched conidiophores that form a single layer, obovate to ellipsoidal-obovate conidia accumulating in slimy whitish heads and mostly lateral, sessile, globose chlamydospores. The subclade of Chl. chlamydosporum was separated into three lineages A, B, C (Fig. 8). Their representatives are difficult to distinguish based on morphological characters. Thus, more strains are needed to resolve the intraspecific variation of Chl. chlamydosporum. The pale yellow to pale ochre diffusible pigment was observed on MLA in strains CBS 239.75C and CBS 149054.

The ex-type strain of Chl. chlamydosporum, obtained from both CBS (CBS 114.41) and MUCL (MUCL 10050) culture collections, formed mostly smooth, mucoid-waxy colonies with aerial mycelium absent or significantly reduced and sporulation was delayed (>6 months), possibly due to long storage for over 80 years. However, the freshly collected strain CBS 149054 (also isolated from the soil) with identical sequences produced abundant aerial mycelium in vitro and sporulated soon. The appearance of colonies of other studied strains is well-comparable, and the sporulation appeared within a week (Figs 24, ,2525).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g024.jpg

Diversity of colony morphology in Chl. chlamydosporum on CMD, MLA, OA, PCA after 4 wk. A. CBS 114.41. B. CBS 149054. C. CBS 149052. D. CBS 149053. Scale bar = 1 cm.

Phylogenetic analyses and comparative morphology of 10 of 12 strains of Chl. virescens var. chlamydosporum sensu Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) revealed a complex comprising four species (Table 5). Chloridium caudigerum closely resembles Chl. chlamydosporum but differs in ellipsoidal conidia accumulating in whitish heads and cirrhi and terminal, lateral and intercalary chlamydospores.

Chloridium crousii W.P. Wu & Y.Z. Diao, Fungal Diversity 116: 235. 2022.

For a description and illustration, see Wu & Diao (2022).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe on decaying wood from China (Wu & Diao 2022). According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in five samples from two studies collected in forest soils in subtropical and temperate climatic regions in Asia (China) (MAT 19.7 °C, MAP 1 452 mm).

Notes: Chloridium crousii forms conidiophores in a single layer and ellipsoidal-oblong, hyaline conidia 2.8–3.2 × 2.5–2.8 μm aggregated in slimy heads (Wu & Diao 2022). It is closely related to morphologically similar Chl. tropicale and Chl. xishuangbannaense.

Chloridium detriticola var. detriticola Réblová & Hern.-Restr., sp. nov. MycoBank MB 846708. Fig 26.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g026.jpg

Chloridium detriticola var. detriticola. A, B. Conidiophores. C, D. Chlamydospores. E, F. Tip of the phialide with conidia. G–J. Conidia. K, L. Colonies on CMD, MLA, OA, PCA (from left to right) after 4 wk. A–J. On MLA. Images: A–F, H–K. CBS 345.67; G, L. CBS 581.73. Scale bars: A, B = 20 μm; C–J = 10 μm; K, L = 1 cm.

Etymology: Detritus (Latin) means plant debris and incolo (Latin) to inhabit, referring to the habitat of the fungus growing on decaying plant material.

Typus: Germany, Bavaria, Bayrischer Wald, Höllbachgspreng, on decaying wood, Jul. 1967, W. Gams (holotype CBS H-10187, culture ex-type CBS 345.67).

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 56–59 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, mucoid, smooth, pale brown, beige grey centrally, reverse grey-brown. On MLA: colonies 70–72 mm diam, circular, convex, flat margin, margin fimbriate, velvety, furrowed, cobwebby to mucoid at the margin, dark chocolate brown, whitish grey due to heavily sporulating conidiophores, beige at the margin, reverse dark brown grey. On OA: colonies 83–84 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, cobwebby to mucoid, smooth, dark brown to dark grey, interrupted by paler rings of sparse growth, whitish centrally due sporulating conidiophores, reverse dark grey. On PCA: colonies 76–77 mm diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, velvety to cobwebby, zonate, farinose when sporulating, at the centre, dark brown to cinnamon brown, whitish grey centrally, with an outer beige zone of submerged growth, reverse of the same colour. Sporulation was abundant on MLA and OA, moderate on PCA, absent on CMD. Growth at 5–25 °C with an optimum at 5 °C.

Description in culture: On MLA, vegetative hyphae 1.5–3.5 μm diam, branched, septate, subhyaline to pale brown. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores 72–162 × 3–4 μm, macronematous, solitary, straight, unbranched, with none or 1–4 percurrent proliferations, septate, cylindrical, brown, darker at the base, paler towards the apex. Conidiogenous cells 17.5–38 × 2.5–3.5 μm, tapering to 2–2.5 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, integrated, terminal, extending percurrently, cylindrical to subcylindrical, usually pale brown, conidiogenous locus protruding 2–6.5 μm above the collarette; collarettes 2.5–3 μm wide and ca. 1.5 μm deep, subhyaline to pale brown, flaring, shortly funnel-shaped. Conidia (4–)4.5–5.5 × (2.5–)3–3.5 μm (mean ± SD = 4.6 ± 0.3 × 3.0 ± 0.2 μm), obovate to ellipsoidal-obovate, somewhat truncate at the base, hyaline, aseptate, smooth, ageing conidia turn pale brown (>5 wk), accumulating in slimy whitish heads. Chlamydospores 4.5–6 × 4.5–5 μm, mainly lateral, sessile or on a short stalk, sometimes terminal, rarely intercalary, solitary or in short chains of two cells, globose, subglobose or pyriform, brown, thick-walled, smooth. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Additional specimens examined: Czech Republic, South Bohemian Region, Novohradské hory Mts., Pohoří na Šumavě, Myslivna Mt., on decaying wood of Fagus sylvatica, 6 Oct. 2012, M. Réblová M.R. 3774. Sweden, Stockholm, host unknown, date unknown, J.E. Nylund strain 26 (CBS 581.73).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Chloridium detriticola is a saprobe on decaying wood known from the Czech Republic, Germany, and Sweden. According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 7 903 samples from 132 studies, making it the most frequently found taxon. Samples were collected mainly from the soil, less regularly from deadwood and litter in forests across the globe (except Africa) in all climatic zones, with a preference for temperate and boreal climates. Of all the taxa studied, it was the most abundant; it is typically found in the boreal zone of the Northern Hemisphere (Alaska, Canada, and all of Scandinavia), where most other species were absent (MAT 8.4 °C, MAP 1 115 mm). The growth capabilities support the observed preference for colder climates. Of all the taxa studied, together with Chl. detriticola var. effusum, it has the fastest growth at 5 °C and 10 °C, low optimum at 20 °C and was not able to grow at 30 °C.

Notes: Chloridium detriticola forms a strongly supported subclade (100/1.0) in the Chl. chlamydosporum species complex, divided into two lineages introduced as two varieties (Fig. 8). The three isolates of var. detriticola from Europe (CBS 345.67, CBS 581.73, M.R. 3774) can be distinguished from the var. effusum ICMP 15144 from New Zealand, by their broader conidia (3–3.5 μm vs 2.5–3 μm) and significantly longer ITS1 region (165 nt vs 152 nt). The decreased number of nucleotides in ICMP 15144 corresponds to a shorter H1 helix of the ITS1 caused by the absence of several canonical pairs (Fig. 8).

Chloridium detriticola var. detriticola overlaps with the less common Chl. detriticola var. effusum in cardinal growth temperatures and biogeography.

Chloridium detriticola var. effusum Réblová & Hern.-Restr., var. nov. MycoBank MB 846709. Fig 27.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g027.jpg

Chloridium detriticola var. effusum (ICMP 15144). A, B. Colonies. C–H. Conidiophores. I, J. Tip of the phialide. K–N. Conidia. O. Chlamydospores. P. Colonies on CMD, MLA, OA, PCA (from left to right) after 4 wk. A, C, D, K–M. From nature. B, E–G, I, J, N, O. On PCA. H. On MLA. Scale bars: A, B = 250 μm; C = 25 μm; D–H, O = 20 μm; I–N = 5 μm; P = 1 cm.

Etymology: Effūsus (Latin) vast, sprawling, referring to the effuse colonies.

Typus: New Zealand, West Coast Region, Westland District, Jackson River valley, Lake Ellery track SW of Haast, on decaying wood, 11 Mar. 2003, M. Réblová M.R. 2785/NZ 295 (holotype PDD 120399, culture ex-type ICMP 15144).

Description on the natural substrate: Colonies effuse, dark brown, whitish when sporulating; composed of conidiophores. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores 114–218 × 3.5–4.5 μm, macronematous, solitary or in groups, erect, straight or slightly flexuous, unbranched, usually with one percurrent proliferation, cylindrical to somewhat subulate, base bulbous, septate, dark brown, paler towards the apex. Conidiogenous cells 10–29 × 2.5–3.5 μm, tapering to 2–2.5 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, integrated, terminal, extending percurrently, subcylindrical, pale brown; collarettes 3–3.5 μm wide and 1.5–2 μm deep, pale brown to subhyaline, flaring, inconspicuous. Conidia 4–5 × 2.5–3.5 μm (mean ± SD = 4.5 ± 0.3 × 3.0 ± 0.3 μm), obovate to oblong-obovate, hyaline, ageing conidia turn pale brown, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in slimy whitish heads. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 53–54 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, lanose, floccose centrally, cobwebby to mucoid at the margin, pale brown, whitish centrally, reverse brown. On MLA: colonies 70–72 mm diam, circular, convex, flat margin, margin entire, velvety-lanose, cobwebby at the margin, furrowed, dark chocolate brown, whitish grey centrally and star-shaped extending, with an isabelline outer zone of submerged growth, reverse brown. On OA: colonies 74–75 mm diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, mucoid, smooth, cobwebby, and somewhat farinose due to sporulating conidiophores at the centre, dark brown, whitish grey centrally, reverse brown. On PCA: colonies 70–73 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, lanose, floccose, cobwebby at the margin, dark brown, whitish grey at the centre, with an outer beige zone of submerged growth, reverse dark brown. Sporulation was abundant on all media. Growth at 5–25 °C with an optimum at 20 °C.

Description in culture: On MLA, vegetative hyphae 1.5–3.5 μm diam, branched, septate, subhyaline to pale brown. Asexual morph. Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, and conidia are similar to those from nature. The chloridium-type conidiophores 58–115 × 3–4.5 μm, with none or 1–3 percurrent proliferations. Conidiogenous cells 16–39 × 3–3.5 μm, tapering to 2–2.5 μm below the collarette, conidiogenous locus protruding 2–4 μm above the collarette; collarettes 2.5–3.5 μm wide and ca. 1.5 μm deep. Conidia (4–)4.5–5.5 × 2.5–3 μm (mean ± SD = 4.5 ± 0.3 × 2.7 ± 0.2 μm), obovate to oblong-obovate, hyaline, in slimy whitish heads. Chlamydospores 4–6.5(–7) × 4–6 μm, mainly lateral, sessile or on a short stalk, sometimes terminal and intercalary, solitary or in short chains, globose, subglobose, ellipsoidal or pyriform, brown, thick-walled, smooth. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe on decaying wood, known from New Zealand. According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 524 samples from 32 studies, collected mainly in soil and often in roots, deadwood, and litter in forests, grasslands, shrublands, and woodlands worldwide (except Africa) in all climatic zones. It also occurred in the boreal and tundra zones (Alaska, Canada, Scandinavia), where most other species did not occur (MAT 9.6 °C, MAP 1 318 mm). Its observed preference for colder climates is supported by its growth capabilities, similarly to Chl. detriticola var. detriticola.

Note: Chloridium detriticola var. effusum resembles var. detriticola but differs in having longer conidia, and the H1 helix of the ITS1 region is shorter by 10 canonical pairs (Fig. 8).

Chloridium gamsii Réblová & Hern.-Restr., sp. nov. MycoBank MB 846710. Fig. 28.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g028.jpg

Chloridium gamsii (CBS 667.75). A, B. Colonies. C–F. Conidiophores. G. Conidia. H. Tip of the phialide. I, J. Chlamydospores. K. Colonies on CMD, MLA, OA, PCA (from left to right) after 4 wk. A, B, F, G. On CMA with Urtica stems. C–E, H–J. On MLA. Scale bars: A, K = 1 cm; B = 250 μm; C–J = 10 μm.

Etymology: Named after Walter Gams to honour his contribution to mycology and outstanding expertise in the taxonomy and systematics of hyphomycetes and particularly Chloridium.

Typus: Belgium, Ardennes, Le Roptai near Ave-et-Auffe, on decaying wood, Sep. 1975, W. Gams (holotype CBS H-25019, culture ex-type CBS 667.75)

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 28–29 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, mucoid, smooth, dark brown, paler towards the margin, reverse of the same colour. On MLA: colonies 29–30 mm diam, circular, convex, margin entire, velvety, deeply furrowed, developing mucoid cracks at the top of the ridges at the centre of the colony, zonate, dark grey to black at the centre, with white-beige and brown rings, reverse dark brown. On OA: colonies 63–65 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, mucoid, smooth, cobwebby centrally, zonate, pale brown, beige towards the periphery, reverse of the same colour. On PCA: colonies 46–48 mm diam, circular, slightly raised, margin entire, velvety-lanose, zonate, olivaceous-beige, farinose, grey towards the margin, with a pale cinnamon outer zone of submerged growth, reverse dark brown. Sporulation was absent on CMD, sparse on MLA and OA, abundant on PCA. Growth at 5–25 °C with an optimum at 20 °C.

Description in culture: On MLA, vegetative hyphae 1.5–3.5 μm diam, branched, septate, hyaline, subhyaline or pale brown, smooth. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores 34–140 × 2.5–3.5 μm, macronematous, solitary, erect, straight or flexuous, unbranched, with none or 1–3 percurrent proliferations, septate, cylindrical, brown, paler towards the apex. Conidiogenous cells 16–25 × 2–3 μm, tapering to 1.5–2 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, integrated, terminal, extending percurrently, subcylindrical to lageniform, pale brown to subhyaline; collarettes 2.5–3.5 μm wide, 1.5–2 μm deep, subhyaline, flaring, short funnel-shaped. Conidia 3.5–4.5× 2.5–3 μm (mean ± SD = 3.7 ± 0.2 × 2.6 ± 0.2 μm), subglobose to ellipsoidal, to somewhat obovate, hyaline, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in whitish to white-yellow slimy heads and cirrhi. Chlamydospores 5–7.5 × 4.5–6 μm globose, subglobose or clavate, mostly lateral, sessile or on a stipe or in a chain of 2–3 cells, sometimes terminal or intercalary, brown, thick-walled, smooth. Sexual morph. Not observed.

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe on decaying wood, known from Belgium. According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 753 samples from 48 studies, collected mainly in soil but also commonly in litter, deadwood, and roots. Most samples came from forest, cropland, shrubland, grassland, desert, and anthropogenic habitats. The species is widespread in Europe (but rare in Scandinavia) and Australasia, with a few records in Canada and the USA. It was found in all climate types, mainly in temperate zones, more rarely in colder (Sweden), drier or tropical habitats (Australia) (MAT 8.7 °C, MAP 846 mm).

Notes: The strain CBS 667.75 was derived from ascospores of a fungus identified as Ch. vermicularioides with a conidial state Chl. virescens var. caudigerum (Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976). The authentic collection on the natural substrate was not available for study. Conidiophores associated with ascomata had conidia 3 × 2 μm arranged in whitish cirrhi. They are slightly smaller than conidia formed in culture 3.5–4.5× 2.5–3 μm (this study).

Based on the analysis of DNA sequences of four markers, we confirm that the strain CBS 667.75 is unrelated to Chl. virescens or Chl. caudigerum and forms a separate lineage. Therefore, a new species Chl. gamsii is proposed for it. Its closest relative is Chl. biforme from New Zealand, also derived from the ascospores. Chloridium biforme differs from Chl. gamsii in ellipsoidal to suballantoid, somewhat narrower conidia ((3–)3.5–4.5 × 2–2.5 μm in vitro) that turn olivaceous grey in mass in older cultures.

Chloridium guttiferum Réblová & Hern.-Restr., sp. nov. MycoBank MB 846711. Fig. 29.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g029.jpg

Chloridium guttiferum (CBS 126073). A, B. Colonies. C–G. Conidiophores. H. Chlamydospores. I, J. Conidia. K. Colonies on CMD, MLA, OA, PCA (from left to right) after 4 wk. A–C. On CMA with Urtica stems. D–G. On MLA. H–J. On PCA. Scale bars: A, B = 250 μm; C = 25 μm; D–G = 20 μm; H–J = 10 μm; K = 1 cm.

Etymology: Gutta (Latin) drop, fero (Latin) to bear or carry, referring to the heads of conidia resembling drops attached to the conidiogenous loci.

Typus: Peru, Amazon Center for Environmental Education and Research (ACEER) near Iquitos, Medicinal plants trail, primary rainforest, isolated from soil (horizon A1), Jan. 2001, collector unknown (holotype CBS H-25020, culture ex-type CBS 126073 = RMF 47.01).

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 25–30 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, cobwebby to mucoid, zonate, white-beige, colony centre dark brown, with a milky glistening margin surrounded by a beige outer zone of submerged growth, reverse brown. On MLA: colonies 53–56 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, velvety, floccose, furrowed centrally, colony centre olivaceous grey, dark olivaceous brown at the margin with a beige zone of submerged growth, reverse dark brown. On OA: colonies 72–73 mm diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, cobwebby, partly mucoid, smooth, beige with a dark brown irregular zone, reverse olivaceous brown. On PCA: colonies 50–53 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, cobwebby, mucoid and smooth towards the periphery, beige-brown, dark brown at the margin, reverse of the same colour. Sporulation was absent on CMD, abundant on MLA, and sparse on OA and PCA. Growth at 10–37 °C with an optimum at 30 °C.

Description in culture: On CMA with U. dioica stems, vegetative hyphae 1.5–2.5 μm diam, branched, septate, smooth, hyaline, subhyaline to pale brown, sometimes finely encrusted. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores 80–314(–377) × 2.5–3.5 μm, macronematous, solitary or in tufts, erect, unbranched or sparsely branched, commonly with 1–5 percurrent proliferations, with up to 15 proliferations in older cultures (>8 wk), cylindrical, straight or slightly bent, septate, brown, paler towards the apex; branches 52–228(–260) μm, primary branches arise below the septa, curved upwards, occasionally secondary branches are formed, always fertile, terminating into a phialide. Conidiogenous cells 15.5–27 × 2.5–3 μm, tapering to 1.5–2 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, subcylindrical to lageniform, integrated, terminal, pale brown, subhyaline towards the apex, extending percurrently, rarely sympodially; collarettes 2–3 μm wide, ca. 1.5 μm deep, subhyaline, flaring, inconspicuous. Conidia (3–)3.5–4.5 × (2–)2.5–3 μm (mean ± SD = 3.9 ± 0.3 × 2.5 ± 0.2 μm), ellipsoidal to obovate, hyaline, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in olivaceous to olivaceous grey slimy heads. Chlamydospores 4.5–7 × 4.5–5.5 μm, intercalary and lateral, sessile or on a stipe, globose, subglobose or pyriform, brown, thick-walled, smooth. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Habitat and geographical distribution: This species has been isolated from the soil and is known from Peru. According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 237 samples from 36 studies, collected primarily in bulk soil or roots and litter, less often in topsoil or rhizosphere soil, sediment, and water in forest, grassland, cropland, water, wetland, desert and anthropogenic habitats across the globe (except Antarctica). It occurs in temperate, continental humid, tropical, subtropical, and drier zones but not in the boreal zone. It prefers tropical climates and is one of the few species commonly found in South America (MAT 17.9 °C, MAP 1 801 mm). Its preference for warmer climates is consistent with its high growth optimum (30 °C) and temperature tolerance of 37 °C.

Notes: Chloridium guttiferum was resolved as a sister to Chl. bellum in the multigene phylogeny. Strains of both species occur in soil and form ellipsoidal to obovate conidia of nearly identical size. Chloridium guttiferum differs in the caespitose conidiophores, which often branch in older cultures, and the conidia accumulate in olivaceous to olivaceous grey heads on Urtica stems on CMA. Conidiophores of Chl. bellum are solitary, unbranched, and conidia adhere in whitish cirrhi or heads on Urtica stems on CMA. Of all the species, it shares with the phylogenetically related Chl. bellum var. bellum the ability to grow at 37 °C, from which it differs in the absence of growth at 5 °C.

Chloridium jilinense W.P. Wu & Y.Z. Diao, Fungal Diversity 116: 241. 2022.

For a description and illustration, see Wu & Diao (2022).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe on decaying wood from China (Wu & Diao 2022). According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 30 samples from 10 studies, collected mainly in bulk soil but quite often also on deadwood and litter in forest biomes. It occurs in Northern Hemisphere only in Northern America (East part only), Central Europe, and Asia (China), exclusively in temperate climatic regions (MAT 7.7 °C, MAP 880 mm).

Notes: In the ITS-LSU phylogeny (Fig. 7), Chl. jilinense is shown as the closest relative to Chl. caudigerum. These species have similar conidiophores formed in a single layer, solitary or in small groups, and ellipsoidal-oblong conidia adhering in slimy heads. Chloridium jilinense has slightly longer conidia, 4–5 × 2.5–3 μm. In culture, conidia are mostly subglobose to slightly obovate (size was not given); chlamydospores were abundant, terminal and lateral, occasionally intercalary (Wu & Diao 2022).

Chloridium kirkii W.P. Wu & Y.Z. Diao, Fungal Diversity 116: 243. 2022.

For a description and illustration, see Wu & Diao (2022).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe on decaying wood from China (Wu & Diao 2022). According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 351 samples from 29 studies, collected mainly in bulk or topsoil, less often in deadwood, and predominantly in forest biomes in Asia, Europe, and the western part of Northern America. Locations are usually in the humid temperate climatic region, with a few records in tropical and subtropical areas (Southern China) and the Mediterranean (Southern Europe) (MAT 11.5 °C, MAP 1 550 mm).

Notes: This species is characterised by conidiophores that are solitary or in small groups, somewhat short 22–65 × 2–2.5 μm, the shortest likely reduced to single conidiogenous cells, ellipsoidal-oblong conidia 3–3.5 × 2–2.5 μm in slimy heads and lateral or intercalary chlamydospores, which are sometimes arranged in chains. In the ITS-LSU phylogeny (Fig. 7), Chl. kirkii is shown as sister to a strongly supported clade containing other three species, Chl. crousii, Chl. tropicale and Chl. xishuangbannaense.

Chloridium moratum Réblová & Hern.-Restr., sp. nov. MycoBank MB 846712. Fig. 30.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g030.jpg

Chloridium moratum. A. Colony. B, C. Conidiophores. D–F. Conidia. G, H. Maturing pale brown conidia. I. Chlamydospores. J, K. Colonies on CMD, MLA, OA, PCA (from left to right) after 4 wk. A, C–E, H–J. On CMA with Urtica stems. B. On PCA. F, G, K. On MLA. Images: A, F, G, K. FMR 11343; B–E, H–J. CBS 127627. Scale bars: A = 250 μm; B–I = 10 μm; J, K = 1 cm.

Etymology: Morātus (Latin) delayed, referring to the pigmented conidia in aged cultures.

Typus: USA, North Carolina, Coweeta Long-term Ecological Research site near Otto, 40-year-old eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) plantation, conifer forest, isolated from soil (horizon A1), 1988, collector unknown (holotype CBS H-25083, culture ex-type CBS 127627 = RMF 8889 = RMF 8849)

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 46–47 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire to fimbriate, mucoid, glistening, somewhat funiculose at the centre, milky, with pale olivaceous brown ring, centre sometimes brown due to chlamydospore production, reverse beige. On MLA: colonies 84–86 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire to fimbriate, mucoid to cobwebby, somewhat funiculose, whitish creamy, cinnamon centrally or with a cinnamon middle ring, with a pale ochre outer zone of submerged growth, golden-ochre pigment diffusing into the agar, reverse dark orange to amber. On OA: colonies 83–85 mm diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, mucoid, locally cobwebby, milky, brown centrally with irregular whitish patches of aerial mycelium, with a prominent submerged growth, reverse olivaceous brown. On PCA: colonies 80–81 mm diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, mucoid, cobwebby centrally, white-beige, brown at the centre, sometimes pale olivaceous brown at the margin, reverse beige. Sporulation was absent on CMD, sparse on MLA, OA and PCA, though delayed (>6–8 wk). Growth at 5–25 °C with an optimum at 20 °C.

Description in culture: On CMA with U. dioica stems, vegetative hyphae 1.5–3.5 μm diam, branched, septate hyaline, subhyaline to pale brown hyphae, smooth, finely encrusted with age. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores 30–120 × 2.5–4 μm, macronematous, solitary, erect, unbranched, with 1–3 percurrent proliferations, straight or slightly bent, brown, paler towards the apex, base bulbous or slightly inflated. Conidiogenous cells 16–35 × 2.5–4 μm tapering to (1.5–)2–2.5 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, subcylindrical, integrated, terminal, pale brown to subhyaline, paler towards the apex, seldom extending percurrently; collarettes 2.5–3.5 μm wide, 1.5–2 μm deep, subhyaline, flaring, inconspicuous. Conidia (3.5–)4–5 × 2.5–3.5 μm (mean ± SD = 4.3 ± 0.2 × 2.9 ± 0.2 μm), irregularly ellipsoidal to subglobose to slightly obovate with a truncate base, hyaline, smooth, some conidia turn brown and become finely verrucose upon ageing, aseptate, accumulating in slimy whitish heads and cirrhi. Chlamydospores 4.5–6.5 × 4–5.5 μm, mostly globose, but also subglobose, ellipsoidal or clavate, solitary or in short chains, often intercalary, sometimes terminal, seldom lateral. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Other specimen examined: Spain, Asturias, La Molina, Picos de Europa National Park, on decaying wood of a twig, 22 Oct. 2010, M. Hernández-Restrepo, J. Mena Portales & J. Guarro (FMR 11343 = MUCL 53625).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe in soil and decaying wood, known from Spain and the USA. According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 4 405 samples from 57 studies, collected primarily in topsoil in forests across the globe (except Africa and Antarctica). It typically occurs in temperate, subtropical, or tropical climatic zones, but it is almost absent in the boreal region of Europe (MAT 10.8 °C, MAP 1 355 mm).

Notes: Chloridium moratum has hyaline conidia that vary in shape from ellipsoidal to subglobose to obovate with a basal scar and produces soluble golden-ochre pigment on MLA. Some conidia on PCA and CMA in ageing cultures turned brown and slightly verrucose. The conidiophores are straight or slightly bent with seldom percurrent proliferation. Chloridium gamsii is similar to Chl. moratum but differs in smaller conidia, mostly lateral or terminal chlamydospores, and lacks diffusible pigments.

Chloridium peruense Réblová & Hern.-Restr., sp. nov. MycoBank MB 846713. Fig. 31.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g031.jpg

Chloridium peruense (CBS 126074). A, B. Colonies. C–F. Conidiophores. G–I. Chlamydospores. J. Conidia. K. Colonies on CMD, MLA, OA, PCA (from left to right) after 4 wk. A–D. On CMA with Urtica stems. E, F. On MLA. Scale bars: A, B = 250 μm; C–E = 20 μm; F–J = 10 μm; K = 1 cm.

Etymology: Indicating the origin of this species from Peru.

Typus: Peru, Amazon Center for Environmental Education and Research (ACEER) near Iquitos, Medicinal Plants Trail, primary rainforest, isolated from soil (horizon A1), Jan. 2001, collector unknown (holotype CBS H-25017, culture ex-type CBS 126074).

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 82–83 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire to fimbriate, velvety-lanose, floccose, cobwebby towards the margin, pale brown, whitish beige centrally, reverse brown. On MLA: colonies 76–77 mm diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, furrowed, velvety-lanose, locally floccose, cobwebby to mucoid towards the periphery, whitish grey, olivaceous brown towards the margin, reverse brown. On OA: colonies 78–79 mm diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, velvety, farinose and beige grey due to sporulating conidiophores, olivaceous brown at the margin, reverse olivaceous brown. On PCA: colonies 86–88 mm diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, sparsely lanose, beige-pink to dark brown, reverse dark brown. Sporulation was abundant on MLA, OA and PCA, sparse on CMD. Growth at 10–30 °C with an optimum at 30 °C.

Description in culture: On MLA, vegetative hyphae 1–4 μm diam, branched, septate, subhyaline to pale brown, smooth. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores 74–175 × 2.5–3 μm, solitary, in groups or crowded, straight or slightly flexuous, unbranched, with none or 1–2 percurrent proliferations, septate, cylindrical, brown, paler towards the apex. Conidiogenous cells 18–25 × 2.5–3 μm, tapering to (1.5–)2 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, integrated, terminal, extending percurrently, cylindrical to somewhat lageniform, pale brown; collarettes 2.5–3 μm wide and ca. 1 μm deep, subhyaline to pale brown, flaring, shortly funnel-shaped. Conidia 3–4 × 2–2.5 μm (mean ± SD = 3.5 ± 0.3 × 2.2 ± 0.2 μm), obovate to ellipsoidal-obovate, hyaline, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in slimy whitish heads. Chlamydospores 4.5–6 × 4–5.5 μm, mostly lateral, sessile or on a short stalk, sometimes terminal or intercalary, solitary, globose, subglobose or pyriform, brown, thick-walled, smooth. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Habitat and geographical distribution: Chloridium peruense was isolated from soil in Peru. According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 697 samples from 33 studies, collected mainly in topsoil and soil, less often in rhizosphere soil, roots, deadwood, litter, and shoots in forest, woodland, shrubland, wetland, or aquatic habitats worldwide (except Antarctica) in temperate, continental humid, tropical and drier climates but not in the boreal zone. Unlike most other species, it is found in South America and prefers warm and humid climates (MAT 20 °C, MAP 1 685 mm). The affinity to the warmer regions corresponds to its relatively high growth optimum (30 °C) and inability to grow at 5 °C.

Note: Chloridium peruense is well distinguishable among other species of the Chl. chlamydosporum complex, for it has the smallest conidia.

Chloridium proliferatum W.P. Wu & Y.Z. Diao, Fungal Diversity 116: 249. 2022.

For a description and illustration, see Wu & Diao (2022).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe on decaying wood from China (Wu & Diao 2022). According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in nine samples from two studies, collected in bulk and rhizosphere soil in forest and grassland biomes. It occurs in Asia (China) in the tropical or subtropical climatic regions (MAT 23.6 °C, MAP 1 848 mm).

Notes: Chloridium proliferatum is characteristic of having ellipsoidal conidia with a conspicuous basal scar adhering in cirrhi and conidiophores in a single layer on the natural substrate. The production of chlamydospores in cultures was omitted from the protologue (Wu & Diao 2022). It was difficult to align the ITS sequences of this species. Analysis that included the ITS sequence generated from the ex-type strain CGMCC 3.20766 (GenBank accession OL628678) resulted in a position in the centre of the Chl. fuscum clade, which is otherwise morphologically and genetically homogeneous. Therefore, only after applying GBlocks and creating a reduced ITS-LSU data set, the position of Chl. proliferatum could be resolved as a separate lineage close to Chl. crousii, Chl. tropical and Chl. xishuangbannaense (Supplementary Fig. S1).

Chloridium setosum W.P. Wu & Y.Z. Diao, Fungal Diversity 116: 251. 2022. Fig. 32.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g032.jpg

Chloridium setosum (CBS 263.76A). A, B. Colonies. C–G. Conidiophores. H, I. Conidia. J, K. Chlamydospores. L. Colonies on CMD, MLA, OA, PCA (from left to right) after 4 wk. A–D, G, H. On CMA with Urtica stems. E, J. On PCA. F, I, K. On MLA. Scale bars: A, L = 1 cm; B = 250 μm; C, D = 25 μm; E–G = 20 μm; H–K = 10 μm.

For a description on the natural substrate, see Wu & Diao (2022).

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 50–51 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, mucoid, smooth, beige, milky at the margin, reverse of the same colour. On MLA: colonies 70–72 mm diam, circular, convex, flat margin, margin entire, velvety-lanose, sparsely funiculose, somewhat mucoid centrally, zonate, mouse grey, brown at the margin, reverse dark brown. On OA: colonies 49–92 mm diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, cobwebby to mucoid, chestnut brown, dark chocolate brown centrally and at the margin, with sparse whitish aerial mycelium at the centre, reverse dark brown. On PCA: colonies 88–90 mm diam, circular, slightly raised, margin fimbriate, velvety, farinose, olivaceous beige to olivaceous yellow due to conidial masses, brown at the margin, reverse dark brown. Sporulation was absent on CMD, abundant on MLA, OA and PCA. Growth at 5–30 °C with an optimum at 25 °C.

Description in culture: On CMA with U. dioica stems, vegetative hyphae 1–3.5 μm, sparsely branched, septate, hyaline to subhyaline, smooth. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores 50–206 × 2–3 μm, macronematous, solitary or in bundles, erect, straight or flexuous, unbranched or branched, with 1–10 percurrent proliferation, septate, cylindrical, pale brown, paler near the apex; primary lateral branches 35–105 × 2–3 μm, arise above the septa or between them, directed upwards at a wide (nearly 90 °) or narrower angle, usually with a bulbous base, with several percurrent proliferations, always terminating in a phialide. Conidiogenous cells 10–25 × 2.5–3.5 μm, tapering to 1.5–2 μm, monophialidic, integrated, terminal, extending percurrently, subcylindrical to lageniform, pale brown to subhyaline; collarettes 2–2.5 μm wide, ca. 1.5 μm deep, subhyaline, flaring, inconspicuous. Conidia 3–4.5 × 2–3 μm (mean ± SD = 3.6 ± 0.4 × 2.4 ± 0.2 μm), ellipsoidal to subglobose, hyaline, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in yellow-white to pale olivaceous slimy heads or cirrhi, whitish (MLA, OA) or pale olivaceous to olivaceous yellow (PCA). Chlamydospores 4.5–7 × 3.5–4.5 μm sparse, primarily terminal, or lateral on a stipe, subglobose or clavate, thick-walled, smooth. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Specimen examined: Sri Lanka, Central province, Mt. Pidurutalagala, alt. 2 000 m, on decaying wood, Jan. 1973, W. Gams (CBS H-25022, CBS 263.76A).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe on decaying wood, pine cones, plant litter, and dead leaves of bamboo, known from China and Sri Lanka (Wu & Diao 2022, this study). According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 515 samples from 42 studies, collected mainly in various soil types, roots, deadwood, and sediment in forest, grassland, woodland, cropland, shrubland, anthropogenic or aquatic habitats across the globe (except Antarctica) in temperate, continental humid, tropical, subtropical and drier climates, but is absent in the boreal zone (MAT 13.4 °C, MAP 1 420 mm).

Notes: The species was described from a dead cone of Pinus sp. from China (Wu & Diao 2022). On the natural substrate, conidiophores formed two distinct layers of taller setiform, fertile, dark brown conidiophores in fascicles with shorter and paler conidiophores. The conidia from nature are comparable to those in culture (this study); they are ellipsoidal, subglobose, adhering in yellowish cirrhi but somewhat shorter (3–3.8 × 2–2.5 μm) (Wu & Diao 2022). In culture (this study), the morphology of conidiophores varied; however, they always formed a single layer. The conidiophores were solitary and unbranched, with one to several percurrent proliferations on MLA, OA, and PCA. When grown on U. dioica stems on CMA, the conidiophores were solitary or fasciculate, with several primary lateral branches, which were always fertile, terminating into a phialide. The conidia accumulated in cirrhi and heads. Branched conidiophores were rarely observed in other Chloridium species and always in culture, e.g. Chl. guttiferum, Chl. novae-zelandiae and Chl. virescens.

In the phylogenetic tree, Chl. setosum is the closest relative to Chl. virescens. Both species are morphologically highly similar and share similar size and shape of conidia in culture. Chloridium virescens can be distinguished in conidia adhering in yellow-green or green, sometimes whitish cirrhi or heads and the presence of chlamydospores, which are abundant, primarily intercalary, lateral, sometimes aggregated in short chains. In contrast, in Chl. setosum, conidia adhere in yellow white cirrhi, and chlamydospores are rare and usually in a terminal or lateral position. Both species also differ in colony characteristics.

Chloridium tropicale W.P. Wu & Y.Z. Diao, Fungal Diversity 116: 256. 2022.

For a description and illustration, see Wu & Diao (2022).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe on dead leaves of an unidentified tree from China (Wu & Diao 2022). The species was not found in the GlobalFungi database and seems to be rare.

Notes: Chloridium tropicale is characterised by simple conidiophores and oblong to ellipsoidal, straight or slightly curved conidia adhering in heads or cirrhi (Wu & Diao 2022). It is closely related to Chl. crousii and Chl. xishuangbannaense.

Chloridium virescens (Pers.) W. Gams & Hol.-Jech., Stud. Mycol. 13: 17. 1976. Figs 3335.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g033.jpg

Chloridium virescens. A, B. Colonies composed of conidiophores and ascomata. C. Asci. D. Ascogenous hyphae with croziers. E, F. Fragmenting ascospores. G, H. Conidiophores. I, J. Conidia arranged in cirrhi. K. Phialide. A–K. From nature. Images: A, C–G. CBS 145487; B, I–K. CBS 138683; H. CBS 145480. Scale bars: A, B = 250 μm; C, D, J, K = 10 μm; G, H = 20 μm; E, F, I = 5 μm.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g035.jpg

Diversity of colony morphology in Chl. virescens on CMD, MLA, OA, PCA after 4 wk. A. CBS 676.74. B. CBS 145481. C. CBS 102341. D. CBS 144663. E. CBS 601.75B. Scale bar = 1 cm.

Basionym: Dematium virescens Pers., Neues Mag. Bot. 1: 121. 1794.

Synonyms: Sporotrichum virescens (Pers.) Link, Mag. Gesell. naturf. Freunde, Berlin 3: 13. 1809.

Helicosporium virescens (Pers.) Sivan., Bitunicate Ascomycetes and their Asexual morphs, p. 591. 1984.

Chloridium viride Link, Mag. Gesell. naturf. Freunde, Berlin 3: 13. 1809.

Corticium viride (Link) Bres., Oesterr. Bot. Z. 54: 428. 1904.

Cirrhomyces viridis (Link) Höhn., Rabenh. Krypt.-Fl. 1(9): 793. 1910.

Haplaria viride (Link) Rabenh., Klotzschii Herb. Viv. Mycol., Edn Nov, Ser. Sec., Cent. 8: no. 770. 1858.

Dematium asserculorum Pers., Mycol. Europ. 1: 15. 1822.

Chloridium dispersum Nees, Syst. Pilze Schwämme, p. 66. 1816 [1816–17].

Doratomyces viridis Corda, Weitenweber’s Beitr. ges. Nat.-Heilwiss. 1, p. 83. 1837; Icon. Fungorum 1: 19, tab. 5: 262B. 1837.

Haplaria chlorina Ellis & Everh., Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 10: 97. 1883.

Eriosphaeria vermicularioides Sacc. & Roum., Revue Mycol. 5: 235. 1883.

Chaetosphaeria vermicularioides (Sacc. & Roum.) W. Gams & Hol.-Jech., Stud. Mycol. 13: 15. 1976.

Melanopsammella vermicularioides (Sacc. & Roum.) Réblová et al., Sydowia 51: 65. 1999.

Mesobotrys flavovirens Höhn., Sber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-naturw. Kl., Abt. 1, 111: 1048. 1902.

Cirrhomyces flavovirens (Höhn.) Höhn., Rabenh. Krypt.-Fl. 1(8): 760. 1907.

Synonymy was partially adopted after Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976).

Description on the natural substrate: Colonies effuse, hairy, brown, green to yellow-green when sporulating; composed of conidiophores and ascomata. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores macronematous, solitary, crowded, in tufts or loose groups, erect, straight, unbranched, with one to several percurrent proliferations, cylindrical, septate, dark brown, paler towards the apex, forming two layers; conidiophores of the upper layer 106–180 × 2.5–4 μm, setiform but always fertile, conidiophores of the lower layer 48–73 × 2–3.5 μm. Conidiogenous cells 12–14(–23) × 2.5–3 μm, tapering to ca. 1.5–2 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, extending percurrently, subcylindrical to lageniform, pale brown to subhyaline; collarettes 2.5–3 μm wide, ca. 1.5 μm deep, hyaline to subhyaline, flaring, shortly funnel-shaped to inconspicuous. Conidia 2.5–3.5 × 2–2.5 μm (mean ± SD = 3.1 ± 0.2 × 2.1 ± 0.2 μm), subglobose, occasionally somewhat ellipsoidal, hyaline, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in slimy whitish, yellow-green or grass-green cirrhi, sometimes heads. Sexual morph. Ascomata 150–180(–200) μm diam, 160–200 μm high, non-stromatic, superficial, solitary or aggregated, subglobose, papillate, dark brown to black, glabrous, glossy. Ostiole periphysate. Ascomatal wall 22–33 μm thick, fragile, carbonaceous, two-layered. An outer layer consisting of brown, more or less polyhedral cells with opaque walls. An inner layer consisting of several rows of elongated, thin-walled, hyaline cells. Paraphyses 2–4.5 μm, septate, branched, longer than the asci, disintegrating with age. Asci 70–81.5(–86) × 5.5–6.5(–7) μm (mean ± SD = 73.6 ± 3.1 × 64.5 ± 3.7 μm), cylindrical-clavate, stipitate, ascal apex broadly rounded with a non-amyloid apical annulus ca. 2.5 μm wide, 1.5 μm high. Ascospores easily fragmenting within the ascus, part spores 4–5(–5.5) × 2.5–3 μm (mean ± SD = 4.5 ± 0.4 × 2.8 ± 0.2 μm), of almost equal size and shape, fusiform, hyaline, 1-septate, finely verrucose, obliquely 1(–2)-seriate in the ascus.

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 56–60 mm diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate to rhizoidal, velvety, whitish to whitish beige, with an ochre outer zone of submerged growth, pale gold pigment diffusing into the agar, reverse brown. On MLA: colonies 56–58 mm diam, circular, slightly raised, margin fimbriate to lobate, velvety-lanose, somewhat floccose, furrowed, whitish to pale ochre with a prominent ochre zone of submerged growth or brown at the margin due to chlamydospore production, pale gold pigment diffusing into the agar, reverse ochre. On OA: colonies 70–73 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, cobwebby to mucoid, colony centre gold-beige to cinnamon, sometimes dark olivaceous grey due to production of chlamydospores, sometimes zonate with zones of rich and sparse growth and chlamydospore production, sometimes pale yellow pigment diffusing into the agar, reverse beige to pale olivaceous brown. On PCA: colonies 61–63 mm diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate to lobate, whitish with a conspicuous yellow to ochre outer zone of submerged growth, or beige centrally becoming brown to dark brown towards the periphery due to production of chlamydospores, pale yellow to ochre pigment occasionally diffusing into the agar, reverse ochre-beige. Sporulation was abundant on all media, delayed after 6–8 wk. Growth at 5–30 °C with an optimum at 25 °C.

Description in culture: On MLA, vegetative hyphae 1–3 μm diam, branched, septate, hyaline, smooth. Asexual morph. Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia are similar to those from nature. The chloridium-type conidiophores 80–253 × 3–4 μm, sometimes with short rhizoids at the base, growing in a single layer, with up to 11 percurrent proliferations, unbranched or occasionally branched with 1(–2) primary lateral branches. Conidiogenous cells 11–24.5 × 2.5–3.5 μm, tapering to 1.5–2.5 μm below the collarette; collarettes 3–3.5 wide, ca. 1.5 μm deep. Conidia 2.5–4(–4.5) × 2–2.5(–3) μm (mean ± SD = 3.5 ± 0.4 × 2.4 ± 0.2 μm), subglobose to ellipsoidal, occasionally ellipsoidal-oblong, hyaline, accumulating in slimy whitish to white-green heads or cirrhi. Chlamydospores abundant, 4.5–6.5 × 4–5 μm, mostly intercalary, solitary or in short chains, lateral, sessile or on a stipe, or terminal, globose, subglobose, ellipsoidal or pyriform, brown, thick-walled, smooth. Sexual morph. Not observed.

Specimens examined: Belgium, Ardennes, near Neupont, on decaying wood, Sep. 1975, W. Gams (CBS 601.75B); Héverlée, Parc d’Arenberg, on decaying wood of Quercus robur, date unknown, G.L. Hennebert (MUCL 7830-A = CBS 424.76); Malmedy, Fungi Gall. exs. 2693, (isotype of Eriosphaeria vermicularioides L 90.236-665). Czech Republic, Liberec Region, Liberec (Reichenberg), on decaying leaves, twigs and wood, A.C.J. Corda (holotype of Doratomyces viridis PRM 155471, not seen; microscopic slide ex holotype DAOM 40986); South Bohemian Region, Novohradské hory Mts., Èerné údolí, Žofín, the road to National Natural Reserve Žofín, on decaying wood of Acer sp., 6 Oct. 2017, M. Réblová M.R. 3930 (PRA-21338, CBS 144660); South Bohemian Region, Novohradské hory Mts., Horní Stropnice, Bedřichovský potok Natural Monument, on decaying wood of Quercus sp., 5 Oct. 2018, M. Réblová M.R. 3977 (PRA-21339, CBS 145345); ibid., M.R. 3986A (PRA-21340, CBS 145479); ibid., M.R. 3986B (CBS 145480); ibid., M.R. 3987A (PRA-21341, CBS 145481); ibid., M.R. 3987B (CBS 145348); ibid., on decaying wood of Alnus glutinosa, M.R. 3979 (PRA-21342, CBS 145347); ibid., M.R. 3989 (PRA-21343, CBS 145482).; Pardubice Region, Železné hory Mts. Protected Landscape Area, Horní Bradlo, Malá Střítež settlement, Polom National Nature Reserve, alt. 600 m, on decaying wood of Fagus sylvatica, 10 Nov. 2018, M. Réblová M.R. 4062 (PRA-21344, CBS 145487); South Moravian Region, Lanžhot, Ranšpurk National Nature Reserve, on decaying wood, 15 Oct. 1997, M. Réblová M.R. 1148 (PRA-21345); South Moravian Region, Milovice, Milovický les Nature Reserve, on decaying wood of Quercus sp., 18 Nov. 2010, M. Réblová M.R. 3588 (PRA-21346); ibid., M.R. 3599 (PRA-21347); South Moravian Region, Pohansko near Lanžhot, on decaying wood, 16 Oct. 1997, M. Réblová M.R. 1119 (PRA-21348, CBS 102341); South Moravian Region, Skařiny Nature Reserve near Mikulèice, on decaying deciduous wood, 24 Oct. 2004, M. Réblová M.R. 2898 (PRA-21349, CBS 144663). Germany, Rostock, on wood, very probably of Fagus, date unknown, J.H.F. Link (neotype of Chloridium viride B, not seen; microscopic slide ex neotype DAOM 40815). France, Ariège, Pyrénées Mts., Rimont, road D18 ca. 1.5 km from the village, banks of the Le Baup brook, on decaying wood, 3 Oct. 2013, M. Réblová & J. Fournier M.R. 3803 (PRA-21350); Ariège, Pyrénées Mts., Montsegur, road D9 ca. 1 km from the village, banks of the Le Lesset brook, on decaying wood, 1 Oct. 2013, M. Réblová & J. Fournier M.R. 3727 (PRA-21351, CBS 138683); locality unknown, Acer sp., date unknown, F. Mangenot (CBS 152.53). The Netherlands, South Holland Province, Schaesberg near Valkenburg, on decaying angiosperm wood, Jul. 1974, W. Gams (CBS 676.74); South Holland Province, Leiden, Leidse Hout urban park, isolated from soil, 25 Jun. 2021, V. Merckx, M. Stech & S. van Melis (CBS 149051 = SPC87.37). USA, New Jersey, Newfield, on rotten wood of Magnolia, Jul. 1883, J.B. Ellis (holotype of Haplaria chlorina NY, not seen; microscopic slide ex holotype DAOM 35346).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Chloridium virescens is a saprobe on decaying wood of Abies alba, Acer sp., Alnus glutinosa, Fagus sylvatica, Fraxinus excelsior, Quercus petraea, Quercus robur, Quercus sp. and other unidentified hosts and was also isolated from the soil. It is known from Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Ivory Coast, the Netherlands, and the USA (Link 1809, Corda 1837, Ellis & Everhart 1883, Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976, Maggi et al. 1990, this study). It has also been reported as an endophyte of Catharanthus roseus (Kharwar et al. 2008) and Terminalia arjuna and Azadirachta indica (Kharwar et al., unpublished) from India. According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 619 samples from 39 studies, collected mainly in bulk soil, litter and roots in forest and grassland, less often in woodland or anthropogenic habitats. It is abundant in Europe, rare in other regions (Asia, Australasia, South America), and absent in Northern America. All locations are temperate, subtropical, or Mediterranean climates (MAT 9 °C, MAP 743 mm).

Notes: Chloridium virescens is characterised by unbranched conidiophores growing in two distinct layers on the natural substrate, usually in tufts or loose groups, with conidia accumulating into grass-green to yellow-green cirrhi and producing hyaline mycelium and mostly intercalary chlamydospores in culture. Because of its striking appearance, this species has been described under several names listed in the synonymy above.

The remarkable similarity of Chl. virescens with Cirrhomyces caudigerus (von Höhnel 1903) and Bisporomyces chlamydosporus (van Beyma 1940) was reported by Mangenot (1952), Meyer (1959) and Ellis (1971). They attempted to distinguish them by characters of conidia such as size, formation of cirrhi or heads, the colour of conidia in mass, and morphology of chlamydospores. Although Meyer (1959) regarded B. chlamydosporus, C. caudigerus, and Sphaeromycetella leucocephala conspecific, Hughes (1958) considered the first two species separate and transferred them to the genus Chloridium. Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) adopted Meyer’s treatment and regarded Chl. caudigerum and Chl. chlamydosporum as synonyms of Chl. virescens for which they proposed varieties. The three taxa were resolved as separate species lineages in the present phylogeny.

Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) experimentally verified that Ch. vermicularioides is the sexual morph of Chl. virescens. They supported their treatment of Chl. virescens by claiming that sexual morphs of the three varieties are identical. However, an examination of several sexual morphs of different species of Chloridium (this study) confirmed that they are very similar and practically indistinguishable. We examined three strains of Ch. vermicularioides derived from the ascospores and listed in Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976), whose conidial states were initially identified as Chl. virescens var. caudigerum (CBS 667.75) and var. chlamydosporum (CBS 675.74, CBS 676.74). Analysis of their DNA sequences indicated that only the isolate CBS 676.74 represents Chl. virescens, while the two others belong to Chl. gamsii (CBS 667.75) and Chl. caudigerum (CBS 675.74).

The cultural characteristics of Chl. virescens are based on the strain CBS 145481. The appearance of colonies may vary among individual strains on different media, as may the production of chlamydospores. Although chlamydospores formed on all media, only in the strain CBS 102341 and CBS 144663 were abundant and darkened the agar medium. In addition, some of the strains examined in this study released gold, yellow to yellow-ochre diffusible pigments in vitro.

Chloridium xishuangbannaense W.P. Wu & Y.Z. Diao, Fungal Diversity 116: 258. 2022.

For a description and illustration, see Wu & Diao (2022).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe on dead leaves of an unidentified tree from China (Wu & Diao 2022). According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in one sample in a study by Sawada et al. (2021) collected from roots in the tropical and subtropical dry broadleaf forest in Asia (Vietnam) (MAT 22 °C, MAP 1 944 mm).

Notes: Based on ITS and LSU sequence data, Chl. xishuangbannaense is the closest relative to Chl. crousii and Chl. tropicale. This species is characterised by relatively short conidiophores that form a single layer and ellipsoidal to oblong conidia 3.8–5 × 2.2–2.4 μm accumulating in slimy heads. The colour of the conidial masses was not given in the protologue. The absence of conidial cirrhi is also typical for Chl. crousii and Chl. tropicale.

Chloridium section Cryptogonytrichum Réblová, Hern.-Restr., M. Kolařík & F. Sklenar, sect. nov. MycoBank MB 846699.

Etymology: Crypto- (Greek) hidden and Gonytrichum, with reference to the unknown asexual morphology in vivo and the position of the lineage in the ML/BI analyses among former species of the genus Gonytrichum.

Type species: Chloridium novae-zelandiae Réblová & Hern.-Restr.

Description: Colonies effuse, hairy, brown, whitish when sporulating; composed of conidiophores and ascomata. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores (observed only in culture) solitary or loosely caespitose, unbranched or branched, with percurrent proliferations, dark brown. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, terminal, integrated, extending percurrently or sympodially, collarettes flaring. Conidia ellipsoidal to obovate, hyaline, may become brown upon ageing, smooth, accumulating in slimy heads. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores not observed. Chlamydospores absent. Sexual morph. Ascomata perithecial, non-stromatic, superficial, glabrous, with a periphysate ostiole. Paraphyses present, disintegrating with age. Asci unitunicate, stipitate, with a non-amyloid apical annulus. Ascospores fragmenting within the ascus, fusiform, hyaline, 1-septate, smooth or verrucose.

Chloridium novae-zelandiae Réblová & Hern.-Restr., sp. nov. MycoBank MB 846715. Fig. 36.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g036.jpg

Chloridium novae-zelandiae (ICMP 22736). A. Ascomata. B. Asci. C, D. Ascospores. E. Conidia. F, I, J. Conidiophores. G, H. Conidiogenous cells, percurrently and sympodially extending (G: arrow indicates a lateral phialidic aperture). K. Colonies on CMD, MLA, OA, PCA (from left to right) after 4 wk. A–D. From nature. E–J. On PCA. Scale bars: A = 200 μm; B–E, G = 10 μm; F, H, I, J = 20 μm; K = 1 cm.

Etymology: Indicating the origin of the species from New Zealand.

Typus: New Zealand, West Coast Region, Westland District, Mount Aspiring National Park, Cameron Creek Walk, on decaying bark of a trunk of an unidentified tree, 31 Mar. 2005, M. Réblová M.R. 3425/NZ 705 (holotype PDD 120400, culture ex-type ICMP 22736)

Description on the natural substrate: Asexual morph. Not observed. Sexual morph. Ascomata 180–245 μm diam, 200–260 μm high, perithecial, non-stromatic, superficial, base immersed, globose to subglobose, solitary becoming aggregated in a crust, papillate, dark brown, glabrous, glossy. Ostiole periphysate. Ascomatal wall fragile, carbonaceous, 23–28 μm thick, two-layered. The outer layer of consisting of brown, more or less polyhedral cells with opaque walls. An inner layer consisting of several rows of elongated, thin-walled, hyaline cells. Paraphyses 2.5–4 μm wide, slightly tapering upwards, septate, branched, longer than the asci, soon disintegrating. Asci 61–85 × 5.5–6.5(–7) μm, cylindrical-clavate, short-stipitate, ascal apex obtuse with a non-amyloid apical annulus ca. 2 μm wide, 1 μm high. Ascospores fragmenting within the ascus (but less easily than in other Chloridium species), part spores (4–)4.5–5(–5.5) × 2.5–3.5 μm (mean ± SD = 4.6 ± 0.3 × 3.1 ± 0.3 μm), fusiform, the upper part somewhat shorter, hyaline, 1-septate, constricted at the septum, smooth becoming finely verrucose, obliquely 1–2-seriate in the ascus.

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 63–64 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, cobwebby, mucoid at the margin, dark brown, paler at the margin, colony centre beige, with a milky outer zone of submerged growth, reverse dark brown. On MLA: colonies 68–69 mm diam, circular, flat, convex centrally, margin entire, velvety, cobwebby towards the margin, funiculose at the inoculation block, finely furrowed, dark brown, colony centre whitish grey, ochre to cinnamon brown at the margin, reverse dark brown. On OA: colonies 60–62 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, mucoid to cobwebby, zonate, colony centre dark brown, olivaceous brown towards the periphery with paler zones of reduced growth, reverse brown. On PCA: colonies 64–66 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, velvety to cobwebby, mucoid at the margin, cinnamon brown, whitish grey centrally, with a beige outer zone of submerged growth, reverse brown. Sporulation was absent on all media, conidiophores formed only on PCA after prolonged incubation (>8 wk). Growth at 5–25 °C with an optimum at 25 °C.

Description in culture: On PCA, vegetative hyphae 1.5–3.5 μm diam, branched, septate, subhyaline to pale brown, smooth, later encrusted. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores 150–335 × 3–3.5 μm, solitary or in loose fascicles, cylindrical, erect, straight or flexuous, unbranched or occasionally branched, 2–8 percurrent proliferations, septate, dark brown, paler towards the apex; primary branches 48–108 × 2.5–3 μm, turned upwards, terminating into a phialide. Conidiogenous cells 18.5–25(–45) × 3–3.5 μm, tapering to 1.5–2.5 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, sometimes polyphialidic with 1(–4) lateral apertures, integrated, terminal, extending percurrently or sympodially, subcylindrical to lageniform, pale brown to subhyaline, hyaline at the apex; collarettes 2.5–3.5 μm wide, 1.5–2.5 μm deep, flaring. Conidia 4.5–5.5 × 2.5–3.5 μm (mean ± SD = 4.8 ± 0.3 × 3.1 ± 0.3 μm), ellipsoidal, slightly tapering towards both ends, occasionally obovate, hyaline becoming brown in older cultures (>12 wk), smooth, accumulating in slimy whitish heads. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores are absent. Chlamydospores absent. Sexual morph. Not observed.

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe on decaying wood, known from New Zealand. According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in two samples (two reads in total) from a single study. It was found in forest soil in the temperate zone of Australia. The revealed distribution suggests that this is a rare species (MAT 14.8 °C, MAP 1 117 mm).

Notes: The axenic culture of this species was derived from ascospores. Although we used different media, only chloridium-type conidiophores, occasionally branched in older cultures, formed. Because only ascomata occurred on the natural substrate, we do not know the wild type of the conidial state. Chlamydospores were absent, although they are abundant in species with chloridium-type conidiophores and represent one of the diagnostic traits. The sexual morph of Chl. novae-zelandiae is well-comparable with those of other Chloridium species. However, ascospores fragmented less easily than in other species and were often seen still whole and bicellular. The size of ascospores and asci overlap with those of other species.

In the present phylogenies, Chl. novae-zelandiae always clustered outside the sections Chloridium and Metachloridium. In the ML/BI analysis based on the four-gene concatenated data set (Fig. 5), Chl. novae-zelandiae nested among species that form gonytrichum-type conidiophores, while STACEY analysis (Fig. 3) placed this species in the basal position of all other species. In the individual data sets (results not shown), the position of this species varied. In the ITS tree, it was established as a sister to the sect. Chloridium, in the LSU tree, it grouped as a sister to the sect. Gonytrichum and in the tef1-α and tub2 phylogenies, it formed a sister lineage to all other members of Chloridium.

Chloridium section Gonytrichopsis Réblová, Hern.-Restr., M. Kolařík & F. Sklenar, sect. nov. MycoBank MB 846700.

Etymology: Gonytrichum and -opsis (Greek) appearance, referring to the similarity of Gonytrichum.

Type species: Chloridium chloroconium (W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.) Réblová & Seifert

Description: Colonies effuse, hairy, brown, whitish, or yellow green to pale green when sporulating; composed of conidiophores and ascomata. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores solitary or caespitose, unbranched. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, terminal, integrated. Conidia ellipsoidal to oblong, hyaline, accumulating in heads. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores solitary or crowded, setiform, the main stalk is unbranched, brown, subulate, with a sterile setiform extension, occasionally terminating into a monophialide. The collar-like hyphae grow in the nodes and give rise to phialides and lateral subulately tapering setae with sterile apices (fertile in culture); setae absent or present. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, discrete, borne on a collar-like hypha in whorls in the two lower thirds of the conidiophore, paler than the conidiophore, with a flaring collarette. Conidia ellipsoidal to oblong or irregularly ellipsoidal, hyaline to slightly pigmented, accumulating in cirrhi. Chlamydospores isodiametric or irregular in shape, composed of individual cells arranged intercalary in series or irregular clusters. Sexual morph. Ascomata perithecial, non-stromatic, superficial, glabrous, with a periphysate ostiole. Paraphyses present, disintegrating with age. Asci unitunicate, stipitate, with a non-amyloid apical annulus. Ascospores fragmenting within the ascus, fusiform, hyaline, 1-septate, smooth or verrucose.

Key to accepted species

1a. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores present ............................................................................................................................................................... 2

1b. The chloridium-type conidiophores present ............................................................................................................................................................... 3

2a. Conidia oblong to ellipsoidal-oblong, 3–4 × 1.5–2.5 μm, adhere in yellow, yellow green to pale green cirrhi ................ Chl. chloroconium

2b. Conidia ellipsoidal, slightly asymmetrical, (3–)4–5 × 2–2.5 μm, adhere in whitish cirrhi ........................................................... Chl. simile

3a. Conidia 3.5–4 × 1.5–2.5 μm, oblong to ellipsoidal-oblong ............................................................................................................................................................... Chl. chloroconium

3b. Conidia slightly wider, 2–2.5 μm wide ............................................................................................................................................................... 4

4a. Conidia cylindrical, ellipsoidal, 3.4–3.8 × 2–2.5 μm ............................................................................................................................................................... Chl. sinense

4b. Conidia ellipsoidal to oblong, 3.5–5 × (2–)2.5 μm ............................................................................................................................................................... Chl. simile

Chloridium chloroconium (W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.) Réblová & Seifert, IMA Fungus 7: 134. 2016. Fig. 37, ,3838.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g037.jpg

Chloridium chloroconium. A. Colony composed of ascomata and chloridium-type conidiophores. B. Colony composed of gonytrichum-type conidiophores. C–E, L–N. Conidiophores. F, G, Q. Conidia. H. Asci. I. Ascospores. J, K. Chloridium-type conidiophores. O, P, S, T. Collar-like hyphae with phialides and conidia in cirrhi. R. Chlamydospores. U. Conidiophores and chlamydospores. A–K, O. From nature. L–N, P–U. On CMA with Urtica stems. Images: A–K, O. PRM 796736; L–N, P–U. CBS 149055. Scale bars: A, B = 250 μm; C–E, H, J–N, U = 20 μm; F, G, O–T = 10 μm.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g038.jpg

Chloridium chloroconium (CBS 149055). A, B. Colonies. C. Gonytrichum-type conidiophores. D, E. Colonies, front and reverse. F. Colonies on CMD, MLA, OA, PCA (from left to right) after 4 wk. A, C. On OA with Urtica stems. B. On SNA. D. On MLA. E. On OA. Scale bars: A = 500 μm; B, C = 100 μm; D–F = 1 cm.

Basionym: Chaetosphaeria chloroconia W. Gams & Hol.-Jech., Stud. Mycol. 13: 86. 1976.

Synonyms: Melanopsammella chloroconia (W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.) Réblová et al., Sydowia 51: 65. 1999.

Gonytrichum chlamydosporium G.L. Barron & G.C. Bhatt, Mycopathol. Mycol. Appl. 32: 126. 1967.

Chloridium submersum Z.L. Luo, et al., Mycosphere 11: 502. 2020.

Description on the natural substrate: Colonies effuse, hairy, dark brown, yellow green to pale green when sporulating; composed of conidiophores and ascomata. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores 82–153 × 3–4 μm, macronematous, solitary, crowded or caespitose, erect, straight or slightly flexuous, unbranched, septate, dark brown, paler towards the apex. Conidiogenous cells 11–25.5 × 2.5–3 μm, tapering to ca. 1.5–2 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, integrated, terminal, extending percurrently, subcylindrical, pale brown, subhyaline towards the apex; collarettes ca. 2.5–3 μm wide, 1–1.5 μm deep, hyaline to subhyaline, flaring, inconspicuous. Conidia 3.5–4 × 1.5–2.5 μm (mean ± SD = 3.6 ± 0.2 × 2.1 ± 0.2 μm), oblong to ellipsoidal-oblong, hyaline, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in slimy whitish heads. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores 210–270 × 4–5 μm, base bulbous or broadly lobate, macronematous, solitary or crowded, erect, straight, septate, the main stalk is unbranched, subulate, dark brown, with a sterile setiform extension, apex pale brown, acute. The collar-like hyphae grow in the nodes and give rise to phialides or lateral setae. Setae 45–60 × 3–3.5 μm, similar to the main stalk, 1(–2) primary setae grow from the collar-like hyphae, directed upwards, subulately tapering; apex hyaline, sterile, acute. Conidiogenous cells 7.5–13 × 2.5–3.5 μm, tapering to 1.5–2 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, subulate to lageniform, in 6–8 whorls located in the lower half or two lower thirds of the conidiophore in the nodes at intervals (the same as for internodes) of 13–18 μm below the septa, in groups of 2–4, discrete, sessile or on a supporting cell, pale brown, subhyaline towards the apex; collarettes ca. 2 μm wide, 1 μm deep, inconspicuous, flaring. Conidia 3–4 × 1.5–2.5 μm (mean ± SD = 3.5 ± 0.2 × 2.0 ± 0.3 μm), ellipsoidal to oblong, hyaline, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in slimy, yellow, yellow green to pale green cirrhi. Sexual morph. Ascomata 120–200(–250) μm diam, 150–200 μm high, non-stromatic, superficial, solitary or in groups, globose to subglobose, broadly attached to the substratum, papillate, dark brown to black, glabrous. Ostiole periphysate. Ascomatal wall 8–15 μm thick, fragile, carbonaceous, 2(–3)-layered. An outer layer consisting of brown, more or less polyhedral cells with opaque walls and 1–3 superficial rows of hyaline cells. An inner layer consisting of several rows of elongated, thin-walled, hyaline cells. Paraphyses 1.5–3 μm wide, slightly tapering upwards, septate, longer than the asci, disintegrating with age. Asci 50–74 × 3.5–4(–4.5) μm (mean ± SD = 64.4 ± 6.8 × 4.1 ± 0.3 μm), cylindrical, short-stipitate, ascal apex broadly rounded with a non-amyloid apical annulus ca. 1.5 μm wide, 0.5–1 μm high. Ascospores fragmenting within the ascus (but somewhat less easily than in other Chloridium species), part spores 3.5–4.5 × 2–2.5 μm (mean ± SD = 3.9 ± 0.3 × 2.3 ± 0.1 μm), fusiform, some ascospores are slightly asymmetrical, the upper part is slightly shorter, hyaline, 1-septate, smooth, obliquely uniseriate in the ascus.

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 75–76 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin entire, cobwebby, somewhat floccose, mucoid towards the margin, whitish with concentric dark brown grey zones due to production of chlamydospores, milky grey at the margin, with a prominent submerged growth, reverse dark grey. On MLA: colonies 82–84 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin entire, velvety, floccose, zonate, furrowed, olivaceous, dark grey towards the margin, pale yellow pigment diffusing into the agar at the margin and beneath the colony, reverse olivaceous yellow. On OA: colonies 63–65 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, cobwebby, dark grey to black, yellowish at the margin, yellow green to green pigment diffusing into the agar at the margin and beneath the colony, reverse grass green to petroleum. On PCA: colonies 66–67 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin entire, velvety, cobwebby at the margin, zonate, whitish grey centrally, dark grey towards the periphery, cinnamon-brown at the margin, pale yellow pigment diffusing into the agar beneath the colony, reverse yellow centrally, brown grey towards the margin. Sporulation was abundant on OA, absent on CMD, MLA and PCA. Growth at 5–30 °C with an optimum at 25 °C.

Description in culture: On OA, vegetative hyphae 1–3 μm diam, branched, septate, hyaline to pale brown, brown in older cultures, smooth. Asexual morph. Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia are similar to those from nature. The chloridium-type conidiophores 47–100 × 3–4 μm. Conidiogenous cells 17–49 × 2.5–3 μm, tapering to 1–2.3 μm below the collarette. Conidia 4–4.5(–5.5) × 2–2.5 μm (mean ± SD = 4.3 ± 0.5 × 2.2 ± 0.2 μm), ellipsoidal-oblong, hyaline, accumulating in slimy whitish heads. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores 94.5–263 × 3–5 μm, solitary, in groups or tufts, apex sterile or fertile. Setae 45–123 × 2–2.5 μm, apex fertile. Conidiogenous cells 8–15 × 2–3.5 μm, tapering to 1.5–2 μm below the collarette, lageniform or subcylindrical, in 5–8 whorls located in the lower half or two lower thirds of the conidiophore in the nodes at intervals (the same as for internodes) of (8–)10–20 μm, in groups of 2−6, discrete or terminal; collarettes 1–2 μm wide, ca. 0.5–1.5 μm deep. Conidia 3–4 × 1.5–2 μm (mean ± SD = 3.5 ± 0.2 × 1.8 ± 0.1 μm), oblong to ellipsoidal-oblong, hyaline, sometimes attached in a short chain of two cells at the conidiogenous locus, accumulating in slimy yellow heads or cirrhi. Chlamydospores 6–10 μm long, 7–12 μm wide, isodiametric or irregular in shape, initially pale brown, becoming dark brown with age, thick-walled, composed of individual cells in series or irregular clusters 20–220 μm diam, which may be erumpent above the agar surface and form stromatic bodies. Sexual morph. Not observed.

Specimens examined: Czech Republic, South Bohemian Region, in the valley of the river Lužnice, Kášovický revír forest near Opařany, on decaying wood of a branch of Corylus avelana, 2 Jun. 1965, V. Holubová-Jechová (PRM 796731); Central Bohemian Region, forest Úpor near Mělník, on decaying wood of a branch of Populus nigra, 24 Jun. 1976, V. Holubová-Jechová (PRM 796732). Slovak Republic, Nitra Region, forest NW from Tekovský Hrádok (S from the river Hron) SW from Levice, on decaying wood of a branch, 5 Aug. 1975, V. Holubová-Jechová (holotype of Melanopsammella chloroconia PRM 796736). The Netherlands, Gelderland Province, Doornenburg, isolated from soil, 8 Jun. 2021, F. ten Hoove (CBS 149055 = SPC116.25).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe in terrestrial and freshwater habitats, occurring in soil and decaying wood of Corylus avelana, Populus nigra, and other unknown hosts. The species is known from Canada, China, the Czech and Slovak Republics, and the Netherlands (Barron & Bhatt 1967, Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976, Hyde et al. 2020; this study). According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 1 848 samples from 82 studies, collected mainly in soil but also frequently in the litter, deadwood, and roots. Most specimens come from forests, but it also occurs in cropland, shrubland, grassland, wetland, and anthropogenic habitats on all continents except Antarctica. In Europe, it almost avoids Scandinavia. It was found in all climatic zones, mostly in temperate, cold humid, and boreal climates but also in the subtropics and tropics (sites on the border of China and Laos) (MAT 9.9 °C, MAP 974 mm).

Notes: This species was originally isolated from soil in Canada and described as G. chlamydosporium (Barron & Bhatt 1967) due to conspicuous clusters of chlamydospores formed in vitro. Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) reported this species from decaying wood of deciduous trees and introduced Chaetosphaeria chloroconia as its sexual morph. Based on preliminary phylogenetic analysis, Réblová et al. (2016) transferred the species to the genus Chloridium using the name of the sexual morph as a basionym, the following older epithet, because the name Chl. chlamydosporum (Hughes 1958) already exists and represents a different taxon.

Hyde et al. (2020) described Chl. submersum from submerged decaying wood in China but only with chloridium-type conidiophores. Comparison of Chl. chloroconium with Chl. submersum using DNA sequence data and available morphology showed that they are conspecific. Therefore, Chl. submersum was reduced to the synonymy of Chl. chloroconium.

Chloridium chloroconium and the closely related Chl. sinense (Wu & Diao 2022) represent the section Gonytrichopsis in our phylogeny. Chloridium chloroconium is strikingly similar to Chl. simile, which differs in having larger, ellipsoidal conidia that are slightly asymmetrically curved and adhere in whitish cirrhi, and ascospores are verrucose. The colour of conidial cirrhi of Chl. chloroconium is reminiscent of those of Chl. virescens. Both species share glabrous ascomata without subiculum, and their size of asci and ascospores overlap. Chloridium virescens differs in solitary chlamydospores, occasionally arranged in short chains. In addition, the gonytrichum-type conidiophores do not develop, and the chloridium-type conidiophores form two layers on the natural substrate. Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) reported 1–3 superficial layers of hyaline cells on the surface of the ascomatal wall of the sexual morph. We have not seen this character in the examined specimens; however, the thin layer may disintegrate with age.

Chloridium simile (W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.) Réblová & Hern.-Restr., comb. nov. MycoBank MB 846720. Fig. 39.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g039.jpg

Chloridium simile. A. Colony composed of gonytrichum-type conidiophores. B, G, H. Collar-like hyphae, phialides and conidia. C–E. Gonytrichum-type conidiophores. F. Chloridium-type conidiophores. I. Conidia. A–I. From nature. Images: A, B, D, E, G–I. PRM 796730; C, F. from PRA-21362. Scale bars: A = 250 μm; B, G–I = 10 μm; C–F = 20 μm.

Basionym: Gonytrichum chlamydosporium var. simile W. Gams & Hol.-Jech., Stud. Mycol. 13: 88. 1976.

For a description on the natural substrate, see Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976).

Specimens examined: Czech Republic, Olomouc Region, Hrubý Jeseník Mts., forest Buèina on slopes above the hunting house Františkova myslivna near Kouty nad Desnou, on decaying wood of a trunk of Fagus sylvatica, 4 Aug. 1971, V. Holubová-Jechová (holotype of Gonytrichum chlamydosporium var. simile PRM 796730); ibid., on decaying wood of a branch of F. sylvatica (PRM 796738); South Bohemian Region, Šumava Mts., Prášily, slopes of Mt. Ždanidla, alt. 1250 m, on decaying wood of Fagus sylvatica, 24 Aug. 2000, M. Réblová M.R. 1724 (PRA-21362); South Bohemian Region, Šumava Mts., slopes of Mt. Spáleniště near Stožec, alt. 900 m, on the bark of Acer pseudoplatanus, 28 Aug. 2000, M. Réblová M.R. 2223 (PRA-21363).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe on decaying wood of Fagus sylvatica and Acer pseudoplatanus, known from the Czech Republic in the mountainous regions (Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976, this study).

Notes: Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) distinguished two varieties of Chl. chloroconium (as G. chlamydosporium), var. chlamydosporium and var. simile, based on differences in the size and shape of conidia, the colour of conidial masses, and the ornamentation of ascospore wall of the associated sexual morphs. These differences are considered sufficient to recognise them as separate species. Therefore, a new species-level combination is proposed for var. simile in Chloridium. This approach is consistent with the latest treatment of Chl. caesium (this study).

Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) provided a detailed description of both morphs. We revised the holotype and another specimen, both from the same beech tree, and two other more recent collections of Chl. simile. All these specimens come from mountainous areas with an altitude of 900–1 250 m. Our observations agree with the protologue and the species is illustrated in Fig. 39. Chloridium simile is characterised by unbranched, setiform gonytrichum-type conidiophores with a sterile, acute, rarely fertile apex terminating into a monophialide, whorls of pale brown phialides formed in the nodes in the lower part of the conidiophore, sometimes accompanied by sterile, acute setae pointing upwards. Setae may be absent or present. The conidia are (3–)4–5 × 2–2.5 μm (mean ± SD = 4.2 ± 0.2 × 2.3 ± 0.1 μm), hyaline, ellipsoidal, slightly asymmetrically curved on one side and somewhat flattened on the other side, adhering in whitish cirrhi. The chloridium-type conidiophores frequently occur at the margin of the colony and produce conidia 3.5–5 × (2–)2.5 μm (mean ± SD = 4.6 ± 0.4 × 2.4 ± 0.1 μm), hyaline, ellipsoidal to oblong, in whitish heads. The accompanying sexual morph forms glabrous ascomata and verrucose, fragmenting ascospores. Unfortunately, no living culture of Chl. simile was available for study. Therefore, the new classification in Chl. simile needs to be verified with DNA sequence data.

For comparison with similar Chl. sinense, see the notes to the latter species.

Chloridium sinense W.P. Wu & Y.Z. Diao, Fungal Diversity 116: 253. 2022.

For a description and illustration, see Wu & Diao (2022).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe on rotten seed pods of unidentified Leguminosae from China (Wu & Diao 2022). According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 1 050 samples from 16 studies, mainly collected in topsoil and less frequently in bulk or rhizosphere soil, mainly in forest or woodland biomes. It occurs in Asia and Australasia, typically in temperate, less often in the tropical or subtropical climatic regions (MAT 14.6 °C, MAP 1 384 mm).

Notes: Chloridium sinense was resolved as sister to Chl. chloroconium. It was described with the chloridium-type conidiophores only; the description in culture, including the presence/absence of chlamydospores, was omitted. Based on the protologue, chloridium-type conidiophores formed short cylindrical, ellipsoidal, subglobose conidia 3.4–3.8 × 2–2.5 μm. However, the illustrations based do the holotype show only short cylindrical conidia (Wu & Diao 2022). The proximity of Chl. sinense and Chl. chloroconium in the phylogenetic tree suggests that they may be morphologically similar. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores were not observed in Chl. sinense, however, may be discovered in culture or the newly collected material. Chloridium sinense should be compared with Chl. simile. Both species are remarkably similar in their chloridium-type conidiophores and conidia. The comparative morphology of both species and cultural studies should be used to reveal whether they are conspecific or represent closely related species.

Chloridium section Gonytrichum (Nees & T. Nees) Réblová, Hern.-Restr., M. Kolařík & F. Sklenar, comb. nov. MycoBank MB 846703.

Basionym: Gonytrichum Nees & T. Nees, Nova Acta Phys.-Med. Acad. Caes. Leop.-Carol. Nat. Cur. 9: 244. 1818.

Type species: Chloridium caesium (Nees & T. Nees) Réblová & Seifert

Description: Colonies pulvinate, becoming effuse, brown, whitish to white grey, and powdery when sporulating; composed of conidiophores and ascomata. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores solitary, unbranched, although later collar-like hyphae may develop. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, terminal, integrated. Conidia ellipsoidal or ellipsoidal-oblong, hyaline, accumulating in heads. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores solitary, scattered, crowded or caespitose, of arborescent appearance, the main stalk is unbranched, geniculate in the nodes, brown, cylindrical, apex sterile, narrowly rounded or fertile, setae similar to the main stalk, geniculate. In the nodes, collar-like hyphae grow along the entire length of the conidiophore, from which arise phialides and setae. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, discrete, borne on a collar-like hypha in whorls, or integrated, terminal, paler than the conidiophore; collarettes flaring, inconspicuous. Conidia ellipsoidal-oblong or subglobose, hyaline, aseptate, accumulating in heads or cirrhi. Chlamydospores absent. Sexual morph. Ascomata perithecial, non-stromatic, superficial, glabrous or setose, with a periphysate ostiole. Paraphyses present, disintegrating with age. Asci unitunicate, stipitate, with a non-amyloid apical annulus. Ascospores fusiform, hyaline, 1-septate, fragmenting within the ascus into part spores, finely verrucose.

Key to accepted species

(Data are given for gonytrichum-type conidiophores on the natural substrate)

1a. Two types of conidia (subglobose and ellipsoidal to oblong) form on a conidiophore ..................................................... Chl. subglobosum

1b. Only one type of conidia (ellipsoidal to oblong) forms on a conidiophore ............................................................................................................................................................... 2

2a. Conidiogenous cells 7.5–10.5 × 2–3.5 μm, conidia adhere in cirrhi, intervals between whorls 23–51 μm ............................. Chl. caesium

2b. Conidiogenous cells longer than 10.5 μm, conidia adhere in heads, intervals between whorls usually longer than 51 μm ...................... 3

3a. Conidia 3.5–4.5(–5) × 1.5−2 μm, intervals between whorls 47–70(–80) μm ....................................... Chl. chloridioides var. chloridioides

3b. Conidia 2.5–4 × 1.5–2 μm, intervals between whorls 70–90(–99) μm ....................................... Chl. chloridioides var. convolutum

Chloridium caesium (Nees & T. Nees) Réblová & Seifert, IMA Fungus 7: 134. 2016. Figs 4042.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g040.jpg

Chloridium caesium. A. Ascomata. B, I. Colonies composed of gonytrichum-type conidiophores. C. Ascomatal setae. D. Ascospores fragmenting in the ascus. E. Asci. F. Conidia (a large vacuole is visible in almost all conidia under the phase constrast). G, K, L, N, O. Collar-like hyphae with phialides and setae. H, M. Gonytrichum-type conidiophores. J. Chloridium-type conidiophores. A–E, G, H, J. From nature. F. On OA. I, K–O. On MLA. Images: A–F, I, K–O. CBS 145483; G. CBS 145633; H. PRA-21356; J. PRA-21357. Scale bars: A, B, I = 250 μm; C, G, H, K, M, N = 20 μm; D = 5 μm; E, F, J, L, O = 10 μm.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g042.jpg

Diversity of colony morphology in Chloridium spp. on CMD, MLA, OA, PCA after 4 wk. A–C. Chl. caesium. D, E. Chl. subglobosum. Images: A. CBS 230.74; B. CBS 145483; C. CBS 145633; D. CBS 696.74; E. CBS 134152. Scale bar = 1 cm.

Basionym: Gonytrichum caesium Nees & T. Nees, Nova Acta Phys.-Med. Acad. Caes. Leop.-Carol. Nat. Cur. 9: 244. 1818.

Synonyms: Myxotrichum caesium (Nees & T. Nees) Fr., Syst. Mycol. 3(2): 348. 1832.

Sporotrichum verticillatum Spreng., Syst. Veg., Edn 16, 4(1): 548. 1827.

Conoplea cinerea Pers., Mycol. eur. 1: 12. 1822.

Dematium cinereum (Pers.) Sacc., Syll. Fung. 10: 590. 1892.

Gonytrichum fuscum Corda, Icon. Fungorum 1: 11. 1837.

Gonytrichum erectum Preuss, Fung. Hoyersw., no. 33. 1851. Linnaea 24: 110. 1851.

Eriosphaeria inaequalis Grove, J. Bot. 24: 132. 1886.

Lasiosphaeria inaequalis (Grove) Massee, Grevillea 16: 37. 1887.

Melanopsammella inaequalis (Grove) Höhn., Ann. Mycol. 17: 121. 1920.

Trichosphaerella inaequalis (Grove) E. Müll., Beitr. Kryptfl. Schweiz 11: 575. 1962.

Chaetosphaeria inaequalis (Grove) W. Gams & Hol.-Jech., Stud. Mycol. 13: 79. 1976.

Botrytis glauca Ellis & Everh., Bull. Torrey bot. Club 25: 512. 1898. (Nom. illegit., Art. 53.1.)

Synonymy was adopted after Hughes (1951, 1958) and Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976).

Typus: Germany, on decaying wood and woody fruits of Quercus sp., C.G.D Nees von Esenbeck & T.F.T. Nees von Esenbeck (holotype of Gonytrichum caesium). (Illustration) Nees von Esenbeck C.G.D & Nees von Esenbeck T.F.T., Nova Acta Physico-Medica Academiae Caesareae Leopoldino-Carolinae Naturae Curiosorum 9(1), tab. V, fig. 14. 1818 (lectotype designated here MBT816825, Fig. 41).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g041.jpg

Lectotype illustration of Chloridium caesium (Nees & T. Nees, Nova Acta Phys.-Med. Acad. Caes. Leop.-Carol. Nat. Cur. 9(1): tab. V, fig. 14. 1818).

Description on the natural substrate: Colonies pulvinate, usually as variously sized cushions that often merge and become effuse, dark brown, whitish to grey, and powdery when sporulating; composed of conidiophores and ascomata. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores occur at the margin of the colony or on ascomata, 53–125 μm × 3–3.5 μm, macronematous, erect, unbranched, dark brown. Conidiogenous cells 15–30 μm × 3–4 μm, tapering to 1.5–2 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, subhyaline, terminal, integrated; collarettes 2.5–3 μm wide, ca. 1 μm deep, hyaline, flaring, inconspicuous, meristematic tip slightly protruding beyond the collarette. Conidia identical to nearly identical to those formed on the gonytrichum-type conidiophores, 2.5–3.5 × 1.5(–2) μm (mean ± SD = 3.0 ± 0.3 × 1.7 ± 0.1 μm), ellipsoidal to oblong, hyaline, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in slimy whitish heads. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores 275–520 × 2.5–3 μm, macronematous, solitary, crowded or caespitose, erect, septate, arborescent, the main stalk is unbranched, geniculate in the nodes, cylindrical, slightly tapering towards the apex, dark brown, pale brown to subhyaline towards the apex, apical cell sterile, narrowly rounded to obtuse, occasionally developing into a phialide. The collar-like hyphae grow in the nodes and give rise to phialides and lateral setae. Setae 40–195(–230) × 2–2.5(–3) μm, similar to the main stalk, geniculate, 1−3 primary setae arise from each collar-like hypha, directed upwards, secondary, tertiary, rarely quaternary setae are also formed; setae of the last level are sterile, intricately interwoven, sometimes anastomosing, creating a dense network causing the individual conidiophores difficult to separate. Conidiogenous cells 7.5–10.5 × 2–3.5 μm, tapering to ca. 1 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, ampulliform to somewhat subulate with a slender neck, in many whorls located along the entire length of the conidiophore and setae in the nodes at intervals (the same as for internodes) of 23–51 μm, usually below the septa, in groups of 6–13, discrete, sessile or on nodose, compact, shortly branched hyphae that arise from a collar-like hypha, or integrated, terminal at the tip of the conidiophore, pale brown, subhyaline to hyaline towards the apex; collarettes 1.5–2.5 μm wide, ca. 1 μm deep, subhyaline, flaring, inconspicuous. Conidia 2.5–3 × (1–)1.5 μm (mean ± SD = 2.7 ± 0.2 × 1.4 ± 0.1 μm), ellipsoidal to oblong, hyaline, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in slimy whitish heads or cirrhi. Sexual morph. Ascomata 175–210 μm diam, 185–220 μm high, non-stromatic, superficial, globose to subglobose, papillate, dark brown, setose, becoming glabrous with age; setae (22–)44–80(–115) × 2–2.5 μm, brown, septate, acute, always sterile. Ostiole periphysate. Ascomatal wall 22–26 μm thick, fragile, carbonaceous, two-layered. An outer layer consisting of brown, more or less polyhedral cells with opaque walls. Inner layer consisting of several rows of elongated, thin-walled, hyaline cells. Paraphyses 3–4 μm wide, slightly tapering upwards, septate, branched, longer than the asci, disintegrating with age. Asci 58.5–72(–78) × 4–5 μm (mean ± SD = 68.1 ± 4.7 × 4.8 ± 0.3 μm), cylindrical-clavate, short-stipitate, ascal apex obtuse to broadly rounded with a non-amyloid apical annulus ca. 1.5 μm wide, 0.5–1 μm high. Ascospores easily fragmenting within the ascus, part spores 3.5–5 × 2–3 μm (mean ± SD = 3.9 ± 0.4 × 2.4 ± 0.2 μm), fusiform, slightly asymmetrical, the upper part is slightly shorter, hyaline, 1-septate, finely verrucose, obliquely uniseriate in the ascus.

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 28–32 mm in diam, circular, flat to slightly raised, margin entire, sparsely lanose, floccose, zonate, ivory or white-beige to beige, reverse ivory to pale olivaceous brown. On MLA: colonies 25–31 mm in diam, circular to irregular, slightly raised, margin entire, lanose, mucoid to cobwebby at the margin, furrowed, white to creamy, grey brown at the margin, reverse beige to olivaceous-brown. On OA: colonies 101–104 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate to rhizoidal, submerged, sparsely lanose to cobwebby, floccose, faintly furrowed, creamy to beige, sometimes dark olivaceous grey at the margin, colony centre whitish grey due to sporulating conidiophores, reverse creamy or olivaceous grey. On PCA: colonies 70–72 mm in diam, circular to irregular, flat, margin entire to lobate, submerged, sparsely lanose centrally, floccose, mucoid at the margin, with tiny colourless droplets of the exudate, beige-brown, colony centre white to pale grey, reverse creamy to olivaceous brown. Sporulation was abundant on OA and PCA, sparse to moderate on CMD and MLA. Growth at 10–30 °C with an optimum at 25 °C.

Description in culture: On MLA, vegetative hyphae 1–2.5 μm diam, branched, septate, hyaline, smooth. Asexual morph. Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, and conidia are similar to those from nature. The chloridium-type conidiophores 50–146 × 2.5–3 μm sometimes reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 6.5–13 × 2.5–3.5 μm, tapering to ca. 1.5 μm below the collarette; collarettes 2.5–3 μm wide, 1 μm deep. Conidia nearly identical to those formed on the gonytrichum-type conidiophores, 2.5–3.5 × 1.5–2 μm (mean ± SD = 3.0 ± 0.2 × 1.8 ± 0.1 μm), ellipsoidal to ellipsoidal-oblong, hyaline, accumulating in slimy whitish heads or cirrhi. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores 357–485 × 3(–3.5) μm, apical cell rounded, sterile or rarely terminating into a phialide, with 1–2(–3) primary lateral setae arising from the collar-like hyphae, secondary, tertiary, rarely quaternary setae are also formed; setae of the last level sterile. Conidiogenous cells 8–11 × 2.5–3.5 μm, tapering to 0.5–1 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, in many whorls in the nodes at intervals (the same as for internodes) of (22–)35–63(–73) μm, in groups of 10–14(–17), discrete or terminal at the tip of the conidiophore; collarettes 1.5–2.5 μm wide, ca. 1 μm deep. Conidia 2.5–3(–3.5) × 1.5(–2) μm (mean ± SD = 2.7 ± 0.1 × 1.4 ± 0.1 μm), ellipsoidal to oblong, sometimes slightly apiculate at the basal end, hyaline, accumulating in slimy whitish heads or cirrhi. Chlamydospores absent. Sexual morph. Not observed.

Specimens examined: Austria, Lower Austria, Hollabrunn District, Maissau, the valley of Schleinitz brook, on decaying wood of Salix cinerea, 26 Sep. 1998, W. Jaklitsch W.J. 1209 (PRA-21352, CBS 102339). Czech Republic, Central Bohemian Region, Křivoklátsko Protected Landscape Area, Týřovické skály National Nature Reserve, alt. 325 m, on decaying wood of Carpinus betulus, 13 Oct. 1985, M. Réblová M.R. 1161 (PRA-21355); South Moravian Region, Lanžhot, Ranšpurk National Nature Reserve, alt. 150 m, on decaying wood of Quercus robur, 26 Oct. 2018, M. Réblová M.R. 4005 (PRA-21353, CBS 145483); ibid., on decaying wood of Tilia cordata, M.R. 4012 (PRA-21354, CBS 145633). Germany, Hoyerswerda, on decaying branches of Rubus idaeus, date unknown, Preuss (holotype of Gonytrichum erectum, Herb. Preuss No. 364, B). Sweden, Öland County, Öland Island, Gardby Parish, Tornrör 5 km SW of Gardby, on decaying wood of Corylus avellana, 4 Jun. 2001, M. Réblová M.R. 1883 (PRA-21356); ibid., M.R. 1886 (PRA-21357). The Netherlands, Friesland Province, Ameland Island, decoy near Buren, on a decaying twig of Acer pseudoplatanus, 27 Oct. 1973, W. Gams (CBS 230.74). UK, England, Warwickshire County, Burnt Green Reservoir, on dead sticks, 29 Aug. 1885, W.B. Grove (holotype of Eriosphaeria inaequalis K(M)56449).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Chloridium caesium is common on decaying wood and woody fruits of many hosts, particularly deciduous trees and shrubs, including Abies alba, Acer pseudoplatanus, Alnus glutinosa, bamboo, Betula pendula, Betula sp., Buxus sempervivens, Carpinus betulus, Corylus avellana, Euonymus sp., Fagus sylvatica, Fraxinus excelsior, Larix decidua, Pinus sylvestris, Populus nigra, Frangula alnus, Quercus cerris, Q. petraea, Q. robur, Rhododendron sp., Ribes grossularia, Robinia pseudoacacia, Salix cinerea, Salix sp., Sambucus nigra, Taxus baccata, Tilia cordata, Ulex europaeus and Ulmus sp. It is known from Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom (Hughes 1951, Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976, this study). Chloridium caesium occurs mainly in warmer lowland river-side forests or hilly areas (Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976), which agrees with our data. According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 146 samples from 27 studies, collected mainly in bulk and rhizosphere soil or deadwood, rarely elsewhere (roots, shoots, air, sediment) in different types of habitats (forest, anthropogenic, grassland, woodland, cropland, aquatic and others) in Europe, Asia, Austrasia, and Antarctica. This species does not occur in the Americas, except for a single record in the Western USA. In Europe, it avoids colder (Scandinavia) and less humid regions (e.g. Spain, Italy, France). It is restricted to sites with temperate or subtropical climates (MAT 7.6 °C, MAP 645 mm).

Notes: Chloridium caesium was described from decaying wood and woody fruits of Quercus sp. from Germany (Nees & Nees 1818). As we have not been able to trace the holotype or authenticated material of this species, we lectotypify the name G. caesium with an original illustration of this species (Nees & Nees 1818: tab. V, fig. 14) (Fig. 41). The drawing confirms its identity. The unique morphology of the dark, geniculate conidiophores with regular whorls of phialides and densely interwoven lateral setae has led to repeated descriptions of this species under different names, including Conoplea cinerea (Persoon 1822), Gonytrichum erectum (Preuss 1851), and G. fuscum (Corda 1837). Their types were studied by Hughes (1951, 1958) and Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976), and the proposed synonymy is adopted in this study.

The sexual morph was introduced by Grove (1886) as Eriosphaeria inaequalis. Consequently, it was transferred to genera such as Lasiosphaeria, Melanopsammela, Trichosphaerella, and Chaetosphaeria (Massee 1887, von Höhnel 1919, Müller & von Arx 1962, Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976). Although Grove (1886) stated that G. caesium grows on the same substrate as the sexual morph, he never formally accepted both species as part of the life cycle of a single organism. This relationship was proposed later by von Höhnel (1919) and established experimentally by E.W. Mason using a specimen IMI 441 collected on oak in the United Kingdom and containing only ascomata (Hughes 1951). Hughes (1951) was the first to treat this species using the holomorphic name Melanopsammela inaequalis. Our observations of ascospore-derived cultures (CBS 102339, CBS 145483) confirm the relationship between sexual and asexual morphs. Although ascomata often accompany conidiophores on the natural substrate, both morphs also occur independently.

Chloridium caesium is well distinguishable from other species of the section Gonytrichum by conidiophores with the shortest intervals between collar-like hyphae, compact whorls of the shortest phialides often borne on supporting cells, and nodose hyphae. It has the smallest ellipsoidal-oblong conidia, although in the strain CBS 230.74, conidia were slightly apiculate at the base. Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) listed two cultures of Chl. caesium, CBS 230.74, and CBS 696.74. Based on morphological data and phylogenetic evidence, we confirm that the strain CBS 230.74 is Chl. caesium, however, CBS 696.74 was identified as Chl. subglobosum.

Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) recognised three varieties of Chl. caesium, the type var. caesium, var. chloridioides, and var. subglobosum. Based on the STACEY analysis, the varieties of Chl. caesium were resolved as three strongly supported lineages corresponding to three species, of which Chl. chloridioides has two varieties. The new combinations are proposed in this study. They are distinguished by the size and shape of conidia, the colour of phialides, their size and number in whorls, conidiophore morphology, and the intervals between whorls of phialides and their overall compactness and appearance. The sexual morph is known only for Chl. caesium (Hughes 1951, this study) and Chl. chloridioides var. chloridioides (Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976, this study).

Chloridium chloridioides var. chloridioides (W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.) Réblová & Hern.-Restr., comb. nov. MycoBank MB 846721. Fig. 43, ,4444.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g043.jpg

Chloridium chloridioides var. chloridioides. A. Ascomata associated with chloridium-type conidiophores. B. Colony composed of chloridium- and gonytrichum-type conidiophores. C. Asci. D. Fragmenting ascospores. E–G. Gonytrichum-type conidiophores. H. Chloridium-type conidiophores. I–K. Phialides and setae arising from collar-like hyphae. L. Conidia. A–F, H. From nature. G, I–L. On PCA. Images: A–F, H. PRM 796685; G, I–L. CBS 129.72. Scale bars: A, B = 250 μm; C, D, L = 10 μm; E, G = 50 μm; F = 25 μm; H–K = 20 μm.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g044.jpg

Diversity of colony morphology in Chloridium chloridioides on CMD, MLA, OA, PCA after 4 wk. A, B. Chl. chloridioides var. chloridioides. C. Chloridium chloridioides var. convolutum. Images: A. CBS 239.75A; B. CBS 129.72; C. CBS 145638. Scale bar = 1 cm.

Basionym: Gonytrichum caesium var. chloridioides W. Gams & Hol.-Jech., Stud. Mycol. 13: 83. 1976.

Description on the natural substrate: Colonies pulvinate, visible as low cushions that merge and become effuse, brown, whitish grey and powdery when sporulating; composed of conidiophores and ascomata. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores occur frequently around the ascomata, 97–220 × 2.5–3.5 μm, macronematous, solitary or crowded, sometimes caespitose, erect, straight, septate, unbranched, dark brown, paler towards the apex. Conidiogenous cells 20–26 × 2.5–3 μm, tapering to ca. 1.5 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, integrated, terminal, pale brown to subhyaline; collarettes 2–3 μm wide, ca. 2 μm deep, subhyaline, flaring, inconspicuous. Conidia 3.5–4 × 1.5–2(–2.5) μm (mean ± SD = 3.7 ± 0.5 × 1.9 ± 0.4 μm), ellipsoidal to oblong, hyaline, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in slimy whitish heads. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores 244–450 × 2.5–3.5 μm, macronematous, solitary or crowded, sometimes caespitose, erect, septate, the main stalk is unbranched, geniculate in the nodes, cylindrical, slightly tapering towards the apex, brown, pale brown to subhyaline towards the apex, apical cell sterile, rounded, or terminating into a phialide. The collar-like hyphae grow in the nodes and give rise to phialides and lateral setae. Setae 58–200(–234) × 2–2.5 μm, resembling the main stalk, (1–)2–4 primary setae arise from each collar-like hypha, directed upwards, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary setae are also formed and create a network, the last level of setae with mostly sterile, subhyaline apices, occasionally terminating into a phialide. Conidiogenous cells 11–24 × 2.5–3.5 μm, tapering to ca. 1.5 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, somewhat subulate to subcylindrical, in many whorls located along the entire length of the conidiophore and setae in the nodes at intervals (the same as for internodes) of 47–70(–80) μm, usually below the septa, in groups of 3−7, discrete, usually on 1–2 supporting brown cells or short stalks, or integrated, terminal at the tip of the conidiophore or setae, pale brown towards the base, subhyaline at the tip; collarettes 1.5–2.5 μm wide, ca. 0.5 μm deep, subhyaline, flaring, inconspicuous, meristematic tip slightly protruding above the collarette 1–1.5 μm. Conidia 3.5–4.5(–5) × 1.5−2 μm (mean ± SD = 4.3 ± 0.2 × 1.8 ± 0.2 μm), ellipsoidal to oblong, hyaline, non-septate, smooth, accumulating in slimy whitish heads, occasionally in cirrhi. Sexual morph. Ascomata 150–250 μm diam, 170–270 μm high, non-stromatic, superficial, globose to subglobose, papillate, dark brown, glabrous, glossy, sometimes clothed with the chloridium-type conidiophores. Ostiole periphysate. Ascomatal wall fragile, carbonaceous, 23–30 μm thick, two-layered. An outer layer consisting of brown, more or less polyhedral cells with opaque walls. An inner layer consisting of several rows of elongated, thin-walled, hyaline cells. Paraphyses 2.5–3.5 μm wide, slightly tapering upwards, septate, branched, longer than the asci. Asci 65–89 × 4–5 μm (mean ± SD = 71.6 ± 6.9 × 4.5 ± 0.4 μm), cylindrical-clavate, short-stipitate, ascal apex broadly rounded with a non-amyloid apical annulus ca. 1.5 μm wide, 0.5–1 μm high. Ascospores easily fragmenting within the ascus, part spores 3.5–5 × 2–2.5 μm (mean ± SD = 4.1 ± 0.5 × 2.4 ± 0.2 μm), the upper part is slightly shorter, fusiform, hyaline, 1-septate, finely verrucose, obliquely uniseriate in the ascus.

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 60–62 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin entire, velvety-lanose, floccose, mucoid at the margin, zonate, whitish beige with pale brown zones, reverse of the same colour. On MLA: colonies 58–63 mm in diam, flat, raised at the centre, margin entire, velvety-lanose, locally floccose, zonate, whitish grey centrally due to sporulating conidiophores, beige to pale brown towards the margin, sometimes dark grey to olivaceous brown towards the margin due to heavily pigmented submerged mycelium, reverse olivaceous brown. On OA: colonies 53–68 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin weakly fimbriate to undulate, velvety-lanose, cobwebby towards the margin, sometimes with colourless droplets of the exudate, grey centrally with a beige intermediate zone, olivaceous grey towards the periphery, sometimes whitish to creamy without pigmented hyphae, reverse beige to brown. On PCA: colonies 38–56 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin weakly undulate to fimbriate, sparsely lanose to cobwebby, beige to creamy or cinnamon, grey to olivaceous-brown at the margin, reverse beige. Sporulation was abundant on all media. Growth at 5–25 °C with an optimum at 25 °C.

Description in culture: On PCA, vegetative hyphae 1.5–2.5 μm diam, branched, septate, smooth, subhyaline to pale brown, becoming dark brown. Asexual morph. Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, and conidia are similar to those from nature. The chloridium-type conidiophores 24–115 × 2.5–3 μm, solitary, sometimes reduced to single conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 23–32 × 2.5–3 μm, tapering to 1.5–2 μm below the collarette; collarettes 2–2.5(–3) μm wide, ca. 1.5–2 μm deep, meristematic tip protruding 1.5–2 μm above the collarette. Conidia 3.5–4.5(–5) × 1.5–2(–2.5) μm (mean ± SD = 4.2 ± 0.4 × 1.9 ± 0.2 μm), ellipsoidal to oblong, hyaline, in slimy whitish heads. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores 290–470 × 3–3.5 μm, apex sometimes sterile but usually developing into a phialide, 1–3 primary lateral setae arise from collar-like hyphae in the nodes, secondary and tertiary setae also formed; setae of the last level terminate into a phialide, sometimes sterile. Conidiogenous cells 11–16.5(–18) × 2.5–4(–4.5) μm, tapering to ca. 1.5 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, narrowly lageniform, in many whorls in the nodes at intervals (the same as for internodes) of (30–)40–85 μm, in groups of 3−7, discrete or terminal; collarettes 1.5–2(–2.5) μm wide, ca. 1 μm deep, meristematic tip protruding 1–3 μm above the collarette. Conidia 3.5–4.5(–5) × 1.5−2 μm (mean ± SD = 4.1 ± 0.3 × 1.8 ± 0.1 μm), ellipsoidal to oblong, hyaline, in slimy whitish heads. Chlamydospores absent. Sexual morph. Not observed.

Specimens examined: Czech Republic, South Moravian Region, forest near Brno between Holasice and Veverská Bítýška, on decaying branch of Quercus petraea, 20 Aug. 1974, V. Holubová-Jechová (holotype of Gonytrichum caesium var. chloridioides PRM 796720). Slovak Republic, Bánská Bystrica Region, Dúbrava Reservation, on the southern slope of the valley near village Ponická Huta, on decaying wood of Abies alba, 20 Oct. 1971, V. Holubová-Jechová (PRM 796685). Spain, Castilla y León, Burgos province, Sierra de la Demanda, on a twig, 10 Nov. 2010, M. Hernández-Restrepo & J. Gené (CBS 132488 = FMR 11940). The Netherlands, Gelderland Province, Meerdinkbos near Winterswijk, isolated from humus layer of forest soil, Nov. 1971, B. Söderström (CBS 129.72). UK, Cumbria County, Roudsea Wood, and Mosses National Nature Reserve, on decomposing petiole of Pteridium aquilinum under Quercus-Corylus coppice on slate soil, date unknown, J.C. Frankland no. SD 330820 (CBS 239.75A).

Habitat and geographical distribution: The var. chloridioides is a saprobe; it has been isolated from forest soil and is common on decaying plant tissues, especially on the wood of deciduous trees and decaying plant stems of hosts such as Carpinus betulus, Betula pendula, Fagus sylvatica, Pteridium aquilinum, Quercus petraea, Q. robur, and Tilia cordata. It is known from the Czech Republic, Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom (Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976, this study). Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) indicated that Chl. chloridioides prefers higher altitude sites in mountains and areas of temperature inversion in stream valleys, which separates it ecologically from the similar Chl. caesium. According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 587 samples from 38 studies, collected mainly in bulk soil but also commonly in the litter, deadwood, and roots. Most samples came from forests, but it also occurs in shrubland, grassland, desert, and anthropogenic habitats in Northern America (Canada, USA) and Europe, with a single record in Asia (East Siberia). It is restricted to temperate, cold humid, or boreal climates (MAT 7.5 °C, MAP 657 mm).

Notes: Chloridium chloridioides differs from Chl. caesium by longer conidia adhering in heads, longer phialides arranged in loose whorls, paler conidiophores with longer intervals between the whorls, and the tips of the conidiophores and lateral setae, which regularly develop into a phialide. The chloridium- and gonytrichum-type conidiophores frequently occur together on the natural substrate and in culture. Although the size of conidia in culture is well comparable with those on the natural substrate (holotype PRM 796720), conidia were somewhat shorter, 2.5–3.5 × 1.5−2 μm (mean ± SD = 3.2 ± 0.2 × 1.8 ± 0.2 μm), in the herbarium specimen PRM 796685 (Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976).

Based on morphological data and phylogenetic analyses of four loci, Chl. chloridioides is separated into two varieties; the var. convolutum is introduced below. For their comparison, see the notes to the new variety.

Chloridium chloridioides var. convolutum Réblová & Hern.-Restr., var. nov. MycoBank MB846722. Fig. 44, ,4545.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g045.jpg

Chloridium chloridioides var. convolutum. A. Colony composed of gonytrichum-type conidiophores. B, K, L. Chloridium-type conidiophore. C–F. Gonytrichum-type conidiophores. G–J. Collar-like hyphae with phialides, setae and conidia (I: arrow indicates percurrently extending phialide). M, N. Conidia. A–E, G–J. From nature. F, M, N. On CMD. K, L. On PCA. Images: A–C, M, N. CBS 145504; D, E–J. CBS 145636; K, L. CBS 145638. Scale bars: A = 250 μm; B–L = 20 μm; M, N = 10 μm.

Etymology: Convolûtus (Latin) interwoven, referring to the densely interwoven conidiophores, whose branches create a network.

Typus: Czech Republic, Pardubice Region, Železné hory Mts. Protected Landscape Area, Horní Bradlo, Malá Střítež settlement, Polom National Nature Reserve, alt. 600 m, on decaying wood of Picea abies, 10 Nov. 2018, M. Réblová M.R. 4073 (holotype PRA-21358, culture ex-type CBS 145504).

Description on the natural substrate: Colonies pulvinate, visible as low cushions that merge and colonies become effuse, brown, grey to whitish grey, and powdery when sporulating; composed of conidiophores. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores 90–110 × 3–3.5 μm, macronematous, solitary, erect, septate, unbranched, cylindrical, brown, gradually paler towards the apex. Conidiogenous cells 7–28 × 2–3.5 μm, tapering to 1.5–2 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, subcylindrical, extending percurrently; collarettes ca. 2.5 μm wide, 1 μm deep, subhyaline to hyaline, flaring, inconspicuous, meristematic tip protruding 1.5–4.5 μm above the collarette. Conidia identical to those formed on the gonytrichum-type conidiophores, 3–3.5 × 1.5–2 μm (mean ± SD = 3.3 ± 0.3 × 1.9 ± 0.2 μm), ellipsoidal to oblong, hyaline, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in slimy whitish heads. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores 386–500 × 2.5–3.5 μm, macronematous, solitary or crowded, sometimes caespitose, erect, septate, the main stalk is unbranched, geniculate in the nodes, cylindrical, slightly tapering towards the apex, dark brown, paler towards the apex, apical cell sterile, subhyaline to hyaline, narrowly rounded, occasionally developing into a phialide. The collar-like hyphae grow in the nodes and give rise to phialides and lateral setae. Setae 46–295 × 1.5–2.5 μm, similar to the main stalk, 2−5 primary setae arise from each collar-like hypha, directed upwards, secondary, tertiary and quaternary setae are also formed and create a dense network; setae of the last level are usually sterile. Conidiogenous cells 11–20 × 2–3 μm, tapering to 1–1.5 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, extending percurrently, subulate, subcylindrical to lageniform, in many whorls located along the entire length of the conidiophore and setae in the nodes at intervals (the same as for internodes) of 70–90(–99) μm, usually below the septa, in groups of 3−10, discrete, sometimes on a supporting cell or short stalk, or integrated, terminal at the tip of the conidiophore or setae, pale brown to subhyaline, hyaline at the tip; collarettes 1.5–2 μm wide, ca. 0.5–1 μm deep, subhyaline to hyaline, flaring, inconspicuous, meristematic tip protruding 1–1.5 μm above the collarette. Conidia 2.5–4 × 1.5–2 μm (mean ± SD = 3.4 ± 0.4 × 1.8 ± 0.3 μm), ellipsoidal to oblong, hyaline, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in slimy whitish heads. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 60–61 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, mucoid to cobwebby, whitish centrally, ivory to pale brown towards the margin with a grey-brown zones of sporulating conidiophores, reverse ivory. On MLA: colonies 40–48 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, sparsely lanose to cobwebby, mucoid towards the margin, whitish centrally, camel to pale peach-brown towards the periphery, pale ochre pigment diffusing to the surrounding agar; reverse brown. On OA: colonies 56–58 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate to rhizoidal, sparsely lanose at the centre, mucoid towards the margin, dark olivaceous brown centrally due to conidiophores, isabelline towards the margin, reverse of the same colour. On PCA: colonies 54–60 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, sparsely lanose at the centre, mucoid towards the periphery, olivaceous grey centrally due to aggregated conidiophores, white to isabelline towards the periphery, reverse isabelline. Sporulation was sparse on CMD, OA and PCA, absent on MLA. Growth at 5–30 °C with an optimum at 25 °C.

Description in culture: On PCA, vegetative hyphae 1.5–2.5 μm diam, branched, septate, hyaline to subhyaline, smooth, pale brown in older cultures. Asexual morph. Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia are similar to those from nature. The chloridium-type conidiophores occur frequently in early stages of colony development, 53–94(–135) × 2–2.5 μm, pale brown, gradually paler towards the apex, sometimes reduced to single conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 18.5–27 × 2.5–3.5 μm, tapering to 1.5–2 μm below the collarette; collarettes 3–3.5 μm wide, ca. 1 μm deep, meristematic tip protruding 2–4.5 μm above the collarette. Conidia nearly identical to those formed on the gonytrichum-type conidiophores, 3.5–4.5 × 1.5–2.5 μm (mean ± SD = 3.9 ± 0.3 × 1.9 ± 0.2 μm), ellipsoidal to oblong, hyaline, accumulating in slimy whitish heads. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores 288–500 × 2.5–3 μm, 1−3 primary lateral setae arise from the collar-like hyphae in the nodes, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary setae are also formed; setae of the last level are sterile or terminate into a phialide. Conidiogenous cells 13–22(–31.5) × 2–3.5 μm, tapering to 1.5–2 μm just below the collarette, in many whorls in the nodes at intervals (the same as for internodes) of 45–88(–94) μm, in groups of 3−6, discrete or terminal; collarettes 2–3 μm wide, ca. 0.5–1 μm deep, meristematic tip protruding 2–7 μm above the collarette. Conidia 3–4 × 1.5–2 μm (mean ± SD = 3.6 ± 0.2 × 1.6 ± 0.2 μm), ellipsoidal to oblong, hyaline, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in slimy whitish heads. Chlamydospores absent. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Additional specimens examined: Czech Republic, Pardubice Region, Železné hory Mts. Protected Landscape Area, Horní Bradlo, Malá Střítež settlement, Polom National Nature Reserve, alt. 600 m, on decaying wood of Fagus sylvatica, 10 Nov. 2018, M. Réblová M.R. 4055 (PRA-21359, CBS 145636); ibid., on decaying wood of Acer pseudoplatanus, M. Réblová M.R. 4066 (PRA-21360, CBS 145638).

Habitat and geographical distribution: The var. convolutum occurs on dead wood of deciduous and coniferous trees, such as Acer pseudoplatanus, Fagus sylvatica, and Picea abies, and is known from the Czech Republic. According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 1 107 samples from 13 studies, collected mainly in soil (topsoil, bulk soil, and rhizosphere soil), litter and roots. Most samples came from forests in Europe and Asia (China, South Korea, and Japan). It prefers temperate climates with tolerance to subtropical and tropical climates (samples from the China-Laos border) and is absent in colder and drier regions (MAT 10.3 °C, MAP 1 343 mm). It differs from similar Chl. chloridioides var. chloridioides, which is restricted to Europe and North America and prefers colder climate.

Notes: Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) suggested the existence of intermediate forms between Chl. caesium and Chl. chloridioides (initially treated as varieties of Gonytrichum caesium) occurring mainly in hilly areas. However, these forms have never been formally described. Based on molecular and morphological data, Chl. chloridioides was separated into two strongly supported subclades, described as two varieties. The newly proposed var. convolutum is morphologically intermediate between Chl. caesium and Chl. chloridioides and was found in a hilly area at 600 m a. s. l. It is reminiscent of var. chloridioides in ellipsoidal to oblong conidia, relatively long intervals between the whorls of phialides, and a meristematic tip of the conidiogenous cell protruding above the collarette. Still, it differs in slightly narrower phialides, shorter conidia in their lower range, and sparsely formed lateral setae. The two varieties also differ in their growth maxima (25 °C for var. chloridiodes, 30 °C for var. convolutum) and in their different geographical distribution as assessed by metabarcoding data (see above).

Chloridium subglobosum (W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.) Réblová & Hern.-Restr., comb. nov. MycoBank MB 846723. Fig. 42, ,4646.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g046.jpg

Chloridium subglobosum. A, B. Colonies composed of gonytrichum-type conidiophores. C, E. Gonytrichum-type conidiophores. D. Subglobose conidia. F, G, J, K. Collar-like hyphae with whorls of phialides and setae. H. Last level of setae terminating into phialides with conidia in heads. I. Ellipsoidal conidia. L. Phialide with a protruding conidiogenous locus. A–D, F. From nature. E, G–L. On PCA. Images: A–D, F. PRM 796727; E, G–L. CBS 134152. Scale bars: A = 500 μm; B = 250 μm; C, E, F = 50 μm; D, G–L = 10 μm.

Basionym: Gonytrichum caesium var. subglobosum W. Gams & Hol.-Jech., Stud. Mycol. 13: 81. 1976.

Typus: Czech Republic, Ústí nad Labem Region, in a public garden near the village Krásný Dvůr near Podbořany, on decaying wood of Tilia cordata, 3 Jul. 1972, V. Holubová-Jechová (holotype of Gonytrichum caesium var. subglobosum PRM 796727); Central Bohemian Region, forest near Týřovice, rocky slope Týřovické skály, on decaying wood of a trunk of Carpinus betulus, Apr. 1966, V. Holubová-Jechová no. 28 (epitype designated here MBT10010531, CBS H-25193, culture ex-epitype CBS 696.74).

Description on the natural substrate: Colonies pulvinate, becoming effuse, brown, whitish grey and powdery when sporulating; composed of conidiophores. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores grow sparsely at the margin of the colony, 90–200 × 2.5–3.5 μm, macronematous, solitary, erect, straight, septate, unbranched, brown, paler towards the apex. Conidiogenous cells 15–22 × 2.5–3 μm, tapering to ca. 1.5 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, integrated, terminal, pale brown to subhyaline; collarettes 2–2.5 μm wide, ca. 2 μm deep, subhyaline, flaring, inconspicuous. Conidia not seen. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores 370−593 × 2.5−3.5 μm, macronematous, solitary, crowded, sometimes caespitose, erect, septate, the main stalk is unbranched, geniculate in the nodes, cylindrical, slightly tapering towards the apex, dark brown, pale brown to subhyaline at the apex, apical cell developing into a phialide. The collar-like hyphae grow in the nodes and give rise to phialides and lateral setae. Setae 80–254 × 2–3 μm, similar to the main stalk, 1−4 primary setae arise from each collar-like hypha, directed upwards, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary setae are also formed; setae of the last level terminate into a phialide. Conidiophores and setae are interwoven, creating a dense network. Conidiogenous cells 12.5–19.5 × 2.5–4 μm, tapering to 1.5–2.5 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, extending percurrently, lageniform to somewhat subulate or subcylindrical, in many whorls located along the entire length of the conidiophore and setae in the nodes at intervals (the same as for internodes) of 51–77.5 μm, usually below the septa, in groups of 6–10, discrete, sessile or 1–2 supporting cells or a stalk, or terminal; collarettes 2−2.5 μm wide, ca. 1 μm deep, subhyaline, flaring, inconspicuous. Conidia hyaline, aseptate, smooth, of two types: subglobose usually formed on discrete phialides in whorls, 3–4 × 2–2.5(–3) μm (mean ± SD = 3.2 ± 0.3 × 2.4 ± 0.2 μm), hyaline, accumulating in slimy whitish cirrhi, sometimes in heads; ellipsoidal to oblong usually formed on terminal phialides on setae, 3−4 × 1.5−2 μm (mean ± SD = 3.5 ± 0.3 × 1.8 ± 0.2 μm), accumulating in whitish heads. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 28–31 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire to fimbriate, velvety-lanose, cobwebby to mucoid towards the margin, zonate, isabelline to dark brown, reverse creamy or olivaceous brown. On MLA: colonies 18–20 mm diam, circular, slightly raised, margin entire to weakly lobate, velvety, furrowed, white grey to beige with a creamy outer zone, pale peach pigment diffusing into the agar, reverse grey. On OA: colonies 65–66 mm diam, sparsely lanose, farinose when sporulating, cobwebby to mucoid at the margin, whitish grey with pigmented hyphae reduced at the margin or the entire colony dark grey, reverse dark grey. On PCA: colonies 37–38 mm diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, velvety to cobwebby, locally farinose, mucoid at the margin, zonate, beige to pale brown with dark brown circular zones, reverse beige to olivaceous brown. Sporulation was absent on CMD, abundant on PCA, sparse on MLA and OA. Growth at 10–30 °C with an optimum at 30 °C.

Description in culture: On PCA, vegetative hyphae 1–3.5 μm diam, branched, septate, hyaline, smooth, becoming brown and encrusted in aged cultures. Asexual morph. Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, and conidia are similar to those from nature. The chloridium-type conidiophores absent. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores 365–470(−570) × 2.5−3 μm, the apical cell usually developing into a phialide, 1−2(–3) primary lateral setae arise from the collar-like hyphae, secondary, tertiary and quaternary setae are also formed; setae of the last level are sterile, broadly rounded, occasionally terminating into a phialide. Conidiogenous cells 7.5−12(−23.5) × 2.5−4 μm, tapering to 1−1.5 μm just below the collarette, in many whorls in the nodes at intervals (the same as for internodes) of (25−)32−58(−73) μm, in groups of 3−9(−11), discrete or terminal at the tip of the conidiophore or setae; collarettes 1.5−2 μm wide, ca. 1 μm deep. Conidia hyaline, of two types: subglobose, 2.5−3.5 × 2−2.5 μm (mean ± SD = 3.1 ± 0.2 × 2.1 ± 0.1 μm), accumulating in slimy whitish cirrhi or heads; ellipsoidal-oblong 3−4 × 1.5−2 μm (mean ± SD = 3.4 ± 0.2 × 1.7 ± 0.3 μm), accumulating in whitish heads. Chlamydospores absent. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Additional specimen examined: Italy, Viterbo Province, Corviano, on decaying wood, 24 Oct. 2012, W. Jaklitsch, H. Voglmayr & W. Gams (CBS 134152).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe on decaying wood of Carpinus betulus, Tilia cordata, and other unidentified host, and dead leaves of Mangifera indica, known from the Czech Republic, India, and Italy (Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976, Reddy & Reddy 1980, this study). According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 499 samples from 35 studies, collected mainly in different soil types and litter, deadwood, and roots. Most samples originated from forests. It is common in temperate zones across the Northern Hemisphere. It does not occur in Southern Hemisphere (MAT 8.3 °C, MAP 638 mm).

Notes: Although Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) described this species with subglobose conidia only, revision of the holotype PRM 796727 revealed two types of conidia, subglobose and ellipsoidal-oblong, both types formed on a single conidiophore. The holotype consists of three envelopes labelled a) the holotype, b) Chl. caesium, and c) Melanopsammella vermicularioides with verrucose ascospores. All three specimens originate from the same piece of wood of Tilia cordata. In the envelope containing the holotype, the conidia that formed on gonytrichum-type conidiophores on phialides arranged in whorls in the nodes were always subglobose. In contrast, ellipsoidal-oblong conidia formed on the terminal, slender phialides on the conidiophore, and the last level of lateral setae. We examined colonies in different parts of the wood, but they all consistently showed the same conidial pattern. Subglobose conidia usually accumulate in cirrhi, while ellipsoidal conidia are always in heads. Two types of conidia also formed in culture. We confirm that the second envelope contains Chl. subglobosum, while the fungus in the third was identified as Chl. caesium containing conidiophores and ascomata. The isolate CBS 696.74 was selected as the epitype strain of Chl. subglobosum; it originates from the Czech Republic as well as the holotype.

Chloridium subglobosum is most similar to Chl. caesium in producing dark brown gonytrichum-type conidiophores and compact whorls of phialides but differs in longer intervals between the whorls of phialides, darker and longer phialides, and two types of conidia.

Chloridium section Mesobotrys (Sacc.) Réblová, Hern.-Restr., M. Kolařík & F. Sklenar, comb. nov. MycoBank MB 846704.

Basionym: Mesobotrys Sacc., Michelia 2: 27. 1880.

Type species: Chloridium fuscum (Corda) Réblová & Hern.-Restr.

Description: Colonies effuse, hairy or pulvinate, brown, whitish or olivaceous brown to olivaceous grey and powdery when sporulating; composed of conidiophores. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores are absent, although they may occur in culture as an early ontogenetic state of the gonytrichum-type conidiophores because soon the collar-like hyphae are developed. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores solitary, scattered or crowded, the main stalk is unbranched, brown, subulate, with a setiform extension, apex usually sterile, straight, flexuous, uncinate, sometimes circinate, occasionally terminating into a phialide. In the nodes grow collar-like hyphae from which arise phialides and setae. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, discrete, borne on a collar-like hypha in whorls in the lower part of the conidiophore or borne directly on the conidiophore, sessile or on supporting cells, or integrated, terminal, sometimes extending percurrently, rarely sympodially (only in culture), paler than the conidiophore; collarettes flaring, inconspicuous. Conidia ellipsoidal or T- or U-shaped to almost deltoid, hyaline or subhyaline, sometimes becoming pale olivaceous, accumulating in heads or cirrhi. Chlamydospores absent. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Key to accepted species

(Data are given for gonytrichum-type conidiophores on the natural substrate)

1a. Conidia T- or U-shaped to almost deltoid ............................................................................................................................................................... Chl. ypsilosporum

1b. Conidia ellipsoidal or ellipsoidal-oblong ............................................................................................................................................................... 2

2a. Conidia hyaline at maturity, phialides often solitary without collar-like hyphae ............................................................................................................................................................... 3

2b. Conidia subhyaline becoming pale olivaceous at maturity, always in whorls ............................................................................................................................................................... Ch. fuscum

3a. Conidia 3–4(–4.5) × 1.5–2 μm ............................................................................................................................................................... Chl. mirabile

3b. Conidia 2–3 × 1.5–2 μm ............................................................................................................................................................... Chl. pellucidum

Chloridium fuscum (Corda) Réblová & Hern.-Restr., comb. nov. MycoBank MB 846724. Figs 4750.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g047.jpg

Chloridium fuscum (CBS 145346). A, H. Colonies composed of gonytrichum-type conidiophores. B, J, L, N. Phialides in whorls on collar-like hyphae (J: arrow indicates percurrently elongating phialide, L: arrow indicates sympodially elongating phialide). C, D. Conidia. E–G, I, K, M. Gonytrichum-type conidiophores (I: arrows indicate lateral phialidic apertures after sympodial elongation). A, B, E–G, N. From nature. C, D, I. On CMD. H, L. On PCA. J, K, M. On OA. Scale bars: A, H = 250 μm; B, E–G, I–N = 20 μm; C, D = 10 μm.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g050.jpg

Diversity of colony morphology in Chloridium spp. on CMD, MLA, OA, PCA after 4 wk. A–C. Chloridium fuscum. D. Chloridium mirabile. E. Chloridium ypsilosporum. Images: A. IMI 188377; B. IMI 338329; C. CBS 145346; D. CBS 408.76; E. CBS 121859. Scale bar = 1 cm.

Basionym: Chaetopsis fusca Corda, Icon. Fungorum 1: 18, t. 4: 243. 1837.

Synonyms: Mesobotrys fuscus (Corda) Sacc., [as ‘fusca’] Michelia 2: 27. 1880.

Chaetopsis macroclada Sacc., Michelia 1: 79. 1877.

Mesobotrys macrocladus (Sacc.) Sacc. [as ‘macroclada’], Michelia 2: 27. 1880.

Chloridium macrocladum (Sacc.) Karun., Maharachch., C.H. Kuo & K.D. Hyde, Fungal Diversity 104: 74. 2020 (Nom. inval. Art. 41.5).

Gonytrichum macrocladum var. terricola Gambogi, Giorn. Bot. Ital. 103: 46. 1969 (Nom. inval. Art. 39.1).

Mesobotrys simplex J.C. Gilman & E.V. Abbott, J. Iowa State College, Sci. 1: 319. 1927.

Chloridium gonytrichii (F.A. Fernández & Huhndorf) Réblová & Seifert, IMA Fungus 7: 134. 2016.

Melanopsammella gonytrichii F.A. Fernández & Huhndorf, Fungal Diversity 18: 42. 2005.

Chloridium aseptatum M.J. Wei & H. Zhang, Phytotaxa 362: 191. 2018.

Typus: Czech Republic, Liberec Region, site near Liberec (Reichenberg), on decaying pine wood, date unknown, A.C.I. Corda (holotype of Chaetopsis fusca PRM 515142); South Bohemian Region, Novohradské hory Mts., Horní Stropnice, Bedřichovský potok Natural Monument, on decaying wood of Quercus sp., 5 Oct. 2018, M. Réblová M.R. 3978 (epitype designated here MBT10010532, PRA-21361, culture ex-epitype CBS 145346)

Description on the natural substrate: Colonies effuse to somewhat pulvinate, hairy, dark brown, olivaceous brown to olivaceous grey when sporulating; composed of conidiophores. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores absent. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores 260–342 × 5.5–6.5 μm, macronematous, solitary or crowded, erect, straight, septate, the main stalk is unbranched, subulate, dark brown, pale brown to subhyaline towards the apex, apex straight, sterile, occasionally terminating into a phialide. The collar-like hyphae grow in the nodes and give rise to phialides and lateral setae. Setae absent or present, 39–99(–150) × 2.5 μm, usually restricted to the upper part of the conidiophore, 1–4 primary setae arise from collar-like hyphae, directed upwards, unbranched, without whorls of phialides and secondary setae, tapering subulately, apex hyaline, sterile, straight or uncinate. Upper parts of conidiophores and setae are often intricately interwoven, making the individual conidiophores hardly separable. Conidiogenous cells (9–)12–17 × 2.5–4 μm, tapering to 1.5–2 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, sometimes extending percurrently, subulate, pale brown to subhyaline, hyaline towards the apex, in 5–8 whorls located in the two lower thirds of the conidiophore in the nodes at intervals (the same as for internodes) of 18–26 μm at the septa, discrete, in groups of 3–7, sessile or on a supporting cell, or integrated, terminal; collarettes 2–2.5 μm wide, ca. 1 μm deep, hyaline to subhyaline, flaring, shortly funnel-shaped. Conidia 3.5–4.5 × 2–2.5 μm (mean ± SD = 4.2 ± 0.4 × 2.4 ± 0.2 μm), ellipsoidal, sometimes slightly truncate at the base to somewhat apiculate, subhyaline becoming pale olivaceous, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in slimy, olivaceous heads or short cirrhi. Chlamydospores absent. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Characteristics in culture: On CMD: colonies 67–68 mm in diam, circular, flat, slightly convex at the centre, margin entire, lanose, zonate in the translucent light, dark olivaceous brown, reverse of the same colour. On MLA: 66–68 mm in diam, circular, flat, slightly convex, margin fimbriate, velvety-lanose, somewhat funiculose at the centre, zonate, dark olivaceous with a darker middle zone, reverse dark olivaceous brown. On OA: colonies 65–66 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate to rhizoidal, velvety-lanose, zonate especially in translucent light, dark zones separated by rings of sparse growth, dark olivaceous to dull green, reverse olivaceous black. On PCA: colonies 49–50 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, velvety-lanose, somewhat floccose at the centre, zonate, dark olivaceous brown, darker zones separated by rings of sparse growth, reverse olivaceous black. Sporulation was abundant on all media. Growth at 5–30 °C with an optimum at 30 °C.

Description in culture: On PCA, vegetative hyphae 1.5–3 μm diam, branched, septate, subhyaline to pale brown, smooth. Asexual morph. Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, and conidia are similar to those from nature. The chloridium-type conidiophores occur only in early stages of colony development; 60–150 × 4–4.5 μm, unbranched, pale brown, with a terminal phialide 25–30 × 2.5–3 μm tapering to 1.5–2 μm below the collarette, ca. 2.5 μm wide and 1.5 μm deep, but soon the first collar-like hypha with a whorl of phialides is formed. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores 96–170 × 4–5 μm, brown, paler towards the apex, apical cell subhyaline to hyaline, terminating into a phialide. Setae absent or present, 18.5–94(–190) × 3–4 μm, 1–4 setae are borne on a collar-like hypha, simple without whorls of phialides or secondary setae, apical cell hyaline, primarily sterile, occasionally terminating into a phialide. Conidiogenous cells 14–23.5 × 3–4 μm, tapering to 1.5–2.5 μm below the collarette, monophialidic or polyphialidic, extending percurrently or sympodially with numerous lateral apertures, in 3–8 whorls located in the two lower thirds of the conidiophore in the nodes at intervals (the same as for internodes) of 19–31.5 μm, discrete, in groups of 3–7, or terminal; collarettes 2–2.5 μm wide, 1.5–2 μm deep, flaring. Conidia 3.5–4.5 × 2.5–3 μm (mean ± SD = 4.1 ± 0.2 × 2.8 ± 0.2 μm), ellipsoidal, hyaline to subhyaline when young, subhyaline to olivaceous at maturity, accumulating in slimy olivaceous heads. Chlamydospores absent. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Additional specimens examined: Australia, Western Australia, on composted bark of Eucalyptus sp., 1990, K. Sivasithamparam (IMI 338329). Canada, Ontario, Ancaster, isolated from soil, date unknown, R.G. Atkinson (CBS 201.55); Québec, Chelsea, Gatineau Park, on decaying wood, 1961, G.L. Hennebert (MUCL 4158). Germany, Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel-Kitzeberg, isolated from wheat field soil, date unknown, W. Gams No. C 788 (CBS 875.68 = ATCC 16306). Puerto Rico, El Yunque National Park, on a twig, 19 Jul. 2018, M. Hernández-Restrepo M.H.R. 18015b (CBS 148324). South Africa, Johannesburg, substrate unknown, Mar. 1954, H.J. Swart (CBS 195.60). UK, locality and substrate unknown, 1974, T.G. Mitchell (IMI 188377). USA, Louisiana, isolated from soil, date unknown, E.V. Abbott (culture ex-type of Mesobotrys simplex CBS 169.27 = IMI 045002 = MUCL 920); Louisiana, Baton Rouge, Burden Plantation, on decaying wood, 11 Feb. 2002, K.A. Seifert K.A.S. 1483 (CBS 148531); Texas, Huntsville, Walker Co., Center Biological Field Studies, isolated from pine litter by dilution to extinction method (sorbose medium), date unknown, G. Bills (TTI-0889).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Chloridium fuscum is a saprobe inhabiting terrestrial and freshwater biotopes. It has been frequently isolated from soil and commonly occurs on plant remnants, especially decaying wood and bark buried in the damp soil of Cenchrus purpureus, Pinus sp., Platanus occidentalis, Quercus sp., Sambucus sp., bamboo, and other unidentified hosts. It is common in Australia, Canada, China, Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, Korea, Puerto Rico, South Africa, Thailand, the United Kingdom, and the USA (Corda 1837, Saccardo 1880, Gilman & Abbott 1927, Goidànich 1933, Hughes 1951, Domsch et al. 2007, Lee & Go 2000, Fernández & Huhndorf 2005, Luo et al. 2019, Yuan et al. 2020, Yasanthika et al. 2022, Wu & Diao 2022, this study). According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 7 246 samples from 186 studies, collected mainly in the soil in forests, croplands and grasslands worldwide. It is the second most abundant species, apparently occurring in temperate, continental humid, subtropical, tropical, and drier habitats, but is absent (with a few exceptions) in the boreal climatic zone and the northern limit of its distribution is southern Sweden, Wales (UK), and the US-Canada border (MAT 13 °C, MAP 207 mm).

Notes: This species was initially described by Corda (1837) as Chaetopsis (Cha.) fusca from pine wood from the Czech Republic. Saccardo (1880) proposed the genus Mesobotrys, typified by M. fuscus, and listed M. macrocladus, based on Cha. macroclada (Saccardo 1877), as the second accepted species. Hughes (1951) studied the holotype of Cha. fusca and non-type specimens of M. macrocladus from natural material (on bamboo culm from the United Kingdom) and dried cultures of several strains of this species isolated from soil from North America. He concluded that the two species are conspecific and reduced Mesobotrys to synonymy with Gonytrichum. Since Corda’s epithet ‘fusca’ 1837 was unavailable in Gonytrichum at that time as another species G. fuscum (= Chl. caesium) (Corda 1837), was published, Hughes (1951) chose the epithet ‘macrocladum’ for this species. Based on our phylogenetic analyses, G. macrocladum is a member of the genus Chloridium. Since the epithet ‘fusca’ is available in Chloridium, a new combination in this genus is proposed based on Cha. fusca as a basionym. The Czech collection PRA-21361 and the culture CBS 145346 are designated as the epitype and ex-epitype strain of Chl. fuscum in this study.

The ex-type strains of Mesobotrys simplex CBS 169.27 (Gilman & Abbott 1927) and Chloridium aseptatum MFLUCC 11-0216 (Wei et al. 2018) clustered in the clade with the ex-epitype strain of Chl. fuscum. Based on morphology, ML/BI, and STACEY analyses, they are considered conspecific with Chl. fuscum and are accepted as its synonyms. Based on preliminary study, holotype of Chl. gonytrichii S.M.H. 3785 (as Melanopsammella gonytrichii, Fernández & Huhndorf 2005) is conspecific with Chl. fuscum (results now shown) and is transferred to its synonymy. The available LSU sequence of Chl. gonytrichii is only a short fragment and was not included in the multigene analyses.

Chloridium fuscum is characterised by subhyaline conidia that become olivaceous at maturity and typical conidiophore anatomy. In the upper part of the conidiophore, the collar-like hyphae give rise to upward-pointing setae with sterile, straight, or uncinate apices. However, sporulating conidiophores without setae are regularly found in the same colony. With increasing age, setae usually appear on conidiophores, and conidia turn olivaceous. This variability was depicted in the original illustrations of Cha. fusca (Corda 1837) (conidiophores without setae, hyaline conidia) (Fig. 48A) and Cha. macroclada (Saccardo 1877) (conidiophores with setae, conidia olivaceous) (Fig. 48B) and agrees with Hughes (1951) and our observations of the epitype.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g048.jpg

Original illustrations of Chloridium fuscum. A. Chaetopsis fusca (Corda 1837: Tab. IV, fig. 243). B. Chaetopsis macroclada (Saccardo 1877: Tab. 25).

The colony characteristics are based on the ex-epitype strain CBS 145346 (Fig. 49). The species was grown on four media but only on MLA, OA and PCA the colonies were olivaceous to dull green or dark olivaceous brown due to pigmented conidia, whereas colonies on CMD appeared brown. The growth on CMA (not shown) also resulted in olivaceous to dull green sporulating colonies. Specific variability in colony appearance was observed among the strains studied, which may be partly due to the overall length of the preservation period. The oldest strains, such as CBS 169.27, CBS 201.55, CBS 195.60, and CBS 875.68, which were preserved for 54–95 years, often lost the ability to induce pigment in conidia or hyphae in vitro on media such as CMD, MLA, and PCA. Interestingly, the closest relative to the ex-type strain of M. simplex CBS 129.27 is the strain CBS 148531; both were isolated from soil in Louisiana, USA, and are separated by 75 years. The “younger” strain, CBS 148531, produces pigmented conidia and abundant aerial mycelium compared to CBS 129.27, whose growth and mycelium production are reduced.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g049.jpg

Diversity of colony morphology in Chloridium fuscum on CMD, MLA, OA, PCA after 4 wk. A. CBS 169.27. B. CBS 195.60. C. CBS 201.55.D. CBS 875.68. E. CBS 148531. Scale bar = 1 cm.

Despite variability in the colony colour and reduction of aerial mycelium in some strains, no significant differences in morphology could be found. The presence or absence of setae in the upper part of the conidiophore is variable, and sometimes setae appear after prolonged incubation. They may not be restricted to the upper part. We also observed variability in the elongation of the conidiogenous cell; sympodially elongating phialides appeared on CMD in older cultures (>8 wk) (Fig. 47I).

Chloridium fuscum is remarkably similar to Chl. volubile in characters of setiform conidiophores, lateral setae with uncinate apices, and ellipsoidal conidia. For a distinction of the two species, see notes to Chl. volubile.

Chloridium pellucidum Réblová & Hern.-Restr., nom. nov. MycoBank MB 846725.

Basionym: Gonytrichum indicum A.D. Sharma & Munjal, Indian Phytopath. 31: 321. 1979 [1978].

Etymology: Pellûcidus (Latin), transparent, pellucid (allowing passage of light), referring to hyaline conidia.

For description and illustration, see Sharma & Munjal (1979).

Habitat and geographical distribution: It is a saprobe on decaying wood and bark from Brazil and India (Sharma & Munjal 1979, Cruz & Gusmão 2009).

Notes: Chloridium pellucidum is based on Gonytrichum indicum (Sharma & Munjal 1979) but the epithet ‘indicum’ is unavailable for this species because of the validly published Chloridium indicum (Subramanian 1955), which was transferred to the genus Globoramichloridium by Marin-Felix et al. (2019).

The species was described on a dead buried twig from India by Sharma & Munjal (1979). It is remarkably similar to Chl. mirabile in having the conidiophores with a sterile setiform extension, absence of collar-like hyphae, discrete solitary phialides, setae with a swollen base, and hyaline conidia 2–3 × 1.5–2 μm. Unfortunately, no living culture or DNA sequence data are available for study. Chloridium pellucidum is accepted in the section Mesobotrys, but the new treatment should be verified with molecular data.

Based on the morphological comparison, a Brazilian record of Chl. mirabile with conidia 2–3 × 1–2 μm (Cruz & Gusmão 2009) represents Chl. pellucidum.

Chloridium mirabile (Hol.-Jech.) W.P. Wu & Y.Z. Diao, Fungal Diversity 116: 245. 2022. Fig. 50, ,5151.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g051.jpg

Chloridium mirabile. A–C, G, H. Colonies composed of gonytrichum-type conidiophores. D–F. Conidiophores. I–K. Conidiophores with phialides and setae (I: arrow indicates percurrently elongating phialide). L. Conidia. M–P. Phialides (arrow indicates collar-like hyphae). A, B. From nature. C. On SNA with pine needles. G, H. On SNA with banana leaves. D. On OA. F, I–L. On CMA. Images: A, B. PRM 795928; C, G, H, M–P. CBS 149309; D–F, I–L. CBS 408.76. Scale bars: A–C, G, H = 100 μm; D–F = 50 μm; I–P = 10 μm.

Basionym: Gonytrichum mirabile Hol.-Jech., Stud. Mycol. 13: 84. 1976.

For description on the natural substrate, see Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) and Wu & Diao (2022).

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 68–70 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin entire, sparsely lanose, floccose, zonate, colony centre pale brown, creamy towards the margin, later with an outer grey zone of sporulating conidiophores, reverse ivory. On MLA: colonies 51–53 mm in diam, circular, slightly raised, margin entire, lanose, floccose, locally mucoid, furrowed, beige grey, whitish grey towards the margin, farinose when sporulating, reverse dark grey. On OA: colonies 67–79 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin entire to finely fimbriate, sparsely velvety, farinose, mucoid at the centre, pale olivaceous white, brown grey towards the margin, reverse brown. On PCA: colonies 39–41 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin entire, mucoid to cobwebby, floccose, locally funiculose, beige brown, dark brown centrally, mucoid spots creamy, reverse creamy. Sporulation was sparse on CMD, abundant on MLA, OA, and PCA. Growth at 10–30 °C with an optimum at 25 °C.

Description in culture: On CMA with Urtica stems, vegetative hyphae 1.5–3.5 μm diam, branched, septate, hyaline, smooth. Asexual morph. Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, and conidia are similar to those from nature (see Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976). The chloridium-type conidiophores occur only in the early stages of colony development, 70–98 × 2–2.5 μm, unbranched, subhyaline to pale brown with a terminal phialide 16.5–24 × 2.5–3.5 μm, tapering to ca. 1.5 μm below the collarette, soon the first discrete phialides and setae are formed; collarette ca. 2 μm wide and 1.5 μm deep, hyaline, flaring, inconspicuous. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores 220–390 × 3–3.5 μm, macronematous, solitary or crowded, erect, straight, septate, the main stalk is unbranched, subcylindrical to subulately tapering, pale brown, apex sterile, bluntly to narrowly rounded, occasionally terminating into a phialide. The collar-like hyphae are mostly absent. Setae 54–236 × 2.5–3.5 μm, similar to the main stalk, usually in a group of (1–)2(–3), pointing horizontally or upwards, apex sterile, subhyaline, bluntly rounded, the base is often inflated and curved around the conidiophore, sometimes secondary setae are formed, setae of the last level are sterile. Conidiogenous cells 7–9.5 × (4.5–)5–6.5 μm, tapering to ca. 1.5 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, extending percurrently, occasionally sympodially with 1(–2) lateral apertures, ampulliform, subhyaline to hyaline, in 5–8 whorls located in the lower half of the conidiophore at intervals of 7.5–18 μm (internodes (10–)15–28 μm), discrete, mostly solitary, rarely in groups of 2(–3) arising at the septa or irregularly from the conidiophore or setae between the septa, sessile, the base is inflated, somewhat lobed and curved around the conidiophore or setae, rarely borne on a collar-like hypha; collarettes 1.5–2 μm wide, 1–1.5 μm deep, hyaline, flaring to slightly tubular. Conidia 3–4(–4.5) × 1.5–2 μm (mean ± SD = 3.6 ± 0.4 × 1.9 ± 0.2 μm), ellipsoidal to oblong, hyaline, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in slimy whitish heads and cirrhi; creamy to whitish yellow on SNA with pine needles. Chlamydospores absent. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Specimens examined: Czech Republic, Central Bohemian Region, Úpor near Mělník, on decaying wood of a branch of Fraxinus excelsior, 24 Jun. 1976, V. Holubová-Jechová (holotype PRM 795928, culture ex-type CBS 408.76). The Netherlands, Gelderland province, Kapel Avezaath, isolated from soil, 2017, A. Panneman (CBS H-25021, CBS 149309 = JW79019).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Only a few records are available for Chl. mirabile, suggesting it is a rare species. It occurred on the decaying bark and wood of Fraxinus excelsior and other unknown hosts and was also isolated from the soil. It is known from China, Czech Republic, and the Netherlands (Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976, Wu & Diao 2022, this study). According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 417 samples from 21 studies, collected mainly in soil and litter and roots in forest and cropland habitats. It is globally distributed on all continents in temperate, continental humid, subtropical, tropical, and drier climates but not in the boreal zone. It has a strong preference for tropical climate. This species is rare in Europe and Northern America (single record) (MAT 12.3 °C, MAP 1 099 mm).

Notes: Chloridium mirabile is unique among other Chloridium species because collar-like hyphae are usually absent, and phialides grow either in the nodes or anywhere on the conidiophore or setae. Phialides have an inflated base divided into two lobes surrounding conidiophores or setae. A similar shift in the morphology of phialides was also found in setae, which often arise in pairs on the conidiophore in the nodes and have the exact ‘anchoring’ mechanism. Chl. mirabile is remarkably similar to Chl. pellucidum, but differs in the size of conidia; for comparison, see notes to the later species.

In the phylogenetic tree, Ch. mirabile clustered in a subclade with Chl. fuscum and Chl. ypsilosporum. They differ in the conidial morphology; Chl. fuscum has ellipsoidal, olivaceous brown conidia at maturity, while Chl. ypsilosporum has conidia hyaline but T- or Y-shaped to somewhat deltoid.

Chloridium ypsilosporum (Hol.-Jech.) Réblová & Hern.-Restr., comb. nov. MycoBank MB 846726. Fig. 50, ,5252.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g052.jpg

Chloridium ypsilosporum. A. Colony composed of gonytrichum-type conidiophores. B, C, H. Conidiophores. D–G. Collar-like hyphae, setae and phialides. I, J. Conidia. A. From nature. B–G. On OA. I, J. On PCA. Images: A. PRM 825348; B–J. CBS 121859. Scale bars: A = 250 μm; B, C, H = 50 μm; D–G, I, J = 10 μm.

Basionym: Gonytrichum ypsilosporum Hol.-Jech., Mycotaxon 15: 288. 1982.

For description on the natural substrate, see Holubová-Jechová (1982).

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 25–27 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, sparsely lanose, mucoid towards the margin, isabelline, colony centre beige-brown, reverse beige. On MLA: colonies 24–29 mm diam, circular, raised, margin fimbriate to rhizoidal, velvety, finely furrowed with narrow cracks in the folds, dark grey with irregular, outer ochre zone of submerged growth, reverse dark grey. On OA: colonies 53–60 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, lanose, farinose, mucoid at the centre and margin, whitish grey to very pale olivaceous, with a creamy outer zone of submerged growth, reverse beige grey. On PCA: colonies 34–38 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, lanose, mucoid at the margin, grey-brown centrally due to aggregated conidiophores, pink-beige towards the margin, reverse beige. Sporulation was abundant on CMD, OA and PCA, absent on MLA. Growth at 15–30 °C with an optimum at 30 °C.

Description in culture: On OA, vegetative hyphae 2–3.5 μm diam, branched, septate, hyaline to subhyaline, smooth. Asexual morph. Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, and conidia are similar to those from nature. The chloridium-type conidiophores absent. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores (138–)283–380 × 2.5–3.5 μm, macronematous, solitary or crowded, erect, straight, septate, the main stalk is unbranched, subcylindrical, pale brown, subhyaline towards the apex, apex straight or flexuous, obtusely rounded, sterile. The collar-like hyphae grow in the nodes and give rise to phialides and lateral setae. Setae 77–222(–291) × 2–3 μm, 2(–3) primary setae grow from the collar-like hyphae near the base of the conidiophore, pointing horizontally or upwards, base bulbous to widely inflated, occasionally secondary and tertiary setae are formed; setae of the last level sterile, apex subhyaline, broadly rounded. Conidiogenous cells 6–9.5(–10.5) × 2.5–3.5(–4) μm, tapering to 1–1.5 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, lageniform to subulate, in 5–8 whorls in the lower half of the conidiophore in the nodes at intervals (the same as for internodes) of 14.5–23.5 μm, usually below the septa, discrete, in groups of 2–6(–10) on collar-like hyphae, sessile or on a supporting cell or short compact branches, sometimes with a broadly inflated base, pale brown to subhyaline; collarettes ca. 1.5 μm wide, 0.5–1 μm deep, subhyaline, flaring, shortly funnel-shaped, inconspicuous. Conidia 2–3 μm long (mean ± SD = 2.6 ± 0.3 μm), T- or U-shaped to almost deltoid, hyaline, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in slimy whitish heads. Chlamydospores absent. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Specimens examined: Cuba, Habana, Jardín Botanico de la Habana, on the dead branch of a deciduous tree, 26 Feb. 1981, V. Holubová-Jechová (holotype PRM 825348). Panama, Cienaga de La Macana, Santa Maria, leaf litter, date unknown, G. Bills (CBS 121859).

Habitat and geographical distribution: This species is a saprobe on decaying wood or leaf litter, known from Cuba and Panama (Holubová-Jechová 1982, this study). According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 305 samples from 23 studies, collected mainly in top or bulk soil in forest, cropland, woodland, shrubland, and grassland habitats. It occurs on all continents except Antarctica, frequently in South America and rarely in Europe in temperate, continental humid, subtropical, tropical, and drier climates but is absent in the boreal zone. This species prefers warm and humid climates (MAT 16.5 °C, MAP 1 313 mm).

Notes: Chloridium ypsilosporum is well distinguishable from other members of the genus in the shape of its conidia, which are T- or U-shaped to almost deltoid compared to the usually ellipsoidal, oblong, or obovate conidia. The setae arise in the nodes in the lower half of the conidiophore and remain sterile at the tip. The chloridium-type conidiophores were absent on the natural substrate and in the culture. In the phylogenetic tree, it grouped with Chl. mirabile and Chl. fuscum in a well-supported subclade.

Chloridium section Metachloridium Réblová, Hern.-Restr., M. Kolařík & F. Sklenar, sect. nov. MycoBank MB 846701.

Etymology: Meta- (Greek) meaning near to, towards, and Chloridium, referring to the adjacent position of the lineage to Chloridium in the phylogenetic tree.

Type species: Chloridium elongatum Réblová & Hern.-Restr.

Description: Colonies effuse, hairy or finely bristle-like, brown, with brown or white conidial masses; composed of conidiophores. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores unbranched, with percurrent proliferations, solitary or caespitose, brown, cylindrical or subcylindrical becoming subulate and stout. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, terminal, integrated, extending percurrently, paler than the conidiophore, collarettes flaring, inconspicuous. Conidia cuneiform, pale brown to pale olivaceous brown, or hyaline, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in slimy heads. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores absent. Chlamydospores intercalary, seldom lateral, solitary but mostly adhering in long chains or clusters, brown, smooth, thick-walled. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Key to accepted species

1a. Conidia hyaline, cylindrical, longer than 10 μm ............................................................................................................................................................... Chl. cylindrosporellum

1b. Conidia pale brown, cuneiform to obovate, shorter than 10 μm ............................................................................................................................................................... Chl. elongatum

Chloridium cylindrosporellum W.P. Wu & Y.Z. Diao, Fungal Diversity 116: 238. 2022.

For a description and illustration, see Wu & Diao (2022).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe on a dead bamboo culm, known from China (Wu & Diao 2022). According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 2 529 samples from 47 studies, collected mainly in topsoil, less frequently in bulk soil, with a few records from deadwood, litter, or roots in forests but also in many other biomes (woodland, shrubland, grassland, desert, mangrove, anthropogenic). It occurs on all continents except Antarctica in temperate, subtropical, and tropical climatic regions. It avoids colder climates (boreal, continental humid, tundra). In Northern America, the distribution is limited to the Eastern part (MAT 7.8 °C, MAP 1 256 mm).

Notes: Wu & Diao (2022) described Chl. cylindrosporellum with conidia formed on a single conidiogenous locus, a morphology that does not fit the definition of Chloridium based on Chl. virescens. The available ITS sequences of the ex-type strain CGMCC 3.20719 (GenBank OL627899) and several non-type strains (unpublished) positioned this species in the Metachloridium section as a sister to Chl. elongatum. While conidia of Chl. elongatum are pale brown to pale olivaceous brown and cuneiform to obovate with a broadly rounded base, conidia of Chl. cylindrosporellum are hyaline, cylindrical, tapering towards both ends, and slightly constricted in the middle with a conspicuous basal scar. Conidia are 11–13 × 3–3.8 μm (Wu & Diao 2022) and significantly exceed the conidial size of members of Chloridium, which have conidia typically 1.5–4.5(–6) × (1.5–)2–2.5 μm being mostly ellipsoidal, oblong to obclavate.

Chloridium cylindrosporellum is remarkably similar to Fusichloridium cylindrosporum (as Chl. cylindrosporum, Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976) (Wu & Diao 2022, this study). The latter species forms similar conidia on setiform conidiophores, terminating into a monophialide with a single conidiogenous locus, accompanied by shorter, less conspicuous, paler conidiophores with several phialidic apertures. The size and shape of conidia of both species are nearly identical; the conidia of F. cylindrosporum are 8.5–11.5(–13) × 2.2–3 μm from nature (Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976), 10.5–13.5 × 3.5–5 μm from nature and, 11.5–13.5(–17) × 4–5 μm in culture (Réblová & Gams 1999). Fusichloridium cylindrosporum is a rare, highly host-specific species that occurs exclusively on decayed wood and bark of coniferous trees and is known from Europe.

The placement of Chl. cylindrosporellum in Chloridium, based on ITS sequence, is unexpected and should be clarified with morphological studies based on more material and living cultures to verify the anatomy of the conidiogenous locus and new DNA sequences of primary and secondary sequence barcodes.

Chloridium elongatum Réblová & Hern.-Restr., sp. nov. MycoBank MB 846714. Fig. 53.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g053.jpg

Chloridium elongatum (CBS 147816). A–C, E, F. Conidiophores. D, I, J. Chlamydospores. G. Base of conidiophores. H. Conidiogenous cells. K. Conidia. L. Colonies on CMD, MLA, OA, PCA (from left to right) after 4 wk. A–C. On OA. D, H–J. On MLA. E–G, K. On SNA with pine needles. Scale bars: A, G = 50 μm; B, C, F, E = 25 μm; D, H, K = 10 μm; I, J = 20 μm; L = 1 cm.

Etymology: Elongatus (Latin) prolonged, protracted, referring to the long conidiophores, which are the longest among Chloridium species.

Typus: The Netherlands, Utrecht Province, Zeist, isolated from soil, 2017, J.A. van Bezooijen (holotype CBS H-25018, culture ex-type CBS 147816 = JW178015).

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 50–51 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, mucoid, smooth, cobwebby at the centre, white-beige, reverse of the same colour. On MLA: colonies 43–45 mm diam, circular, raised, margin undulate to fimbriate, mucoid-waxy, glossy, cobwebby at the margin, deeply furrowed, pink-beige, colony centre brown, dark grey at the margin, gold ochre pigment diffusing into the surrounding agar; reverse dark amber. On OA: colonies 61–64 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, mucoid, smooth, finely zonate, white-beige, olivaceous brown at the margin, reverse creamy. On PCA: colonies 52–53 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, mucoid, smooth, creamy with a prominent pale milky zone of submerged growth at the margin of the colony, reverse creamy. Sporulation was absent on CMD, sparse on MLA, OA and PCA, restricted to the inoculation block. Growth at 5–25 °C with an optimum at 20 °C.

Description in culture: On MLA, vegetative hyphae 1–3.5 μm diam, branched, septate, hyaline to subhyaline, smooth, pale brown, and finely encrusted with age. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores 228–700(–910) × 4–6 μm, base sometimes with robust rhizoids (on SNA), macronematous, solitary, erect, straight, flexuous or somewhat bent, cylindrical to subulate and stout, unbranched, commonly with 5–7 percurrent proliferations, septate, dark brown, paler towards the apex. Conidiogenous cell (17–)30–40 × 2.5–4 μm, tapering to 2–3 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, terminal, integrated, cylindrical to slightly lageniform, pale brown, extending percurrently, conidiogenous locus sometimes inflated, protruding 1.5–3.5 μm above the collarette; collarettes 4–4.5 μm wide, 1.5–2 μm deep, pale brown, flaring, inconspicuous. Conidia 4–5.5(–6) × 2.5–3(–4) μm (mean ± SD = 4.9 ± 0.5 × 2.9 ± 0.2 μm), cuneiform to obovate with a broadly rounded base, pale brown to pale olivaceous brown, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in brown slimy, glossy heads. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores absent. Chlamydospores 6–9(–11) × 5.5–6.5 μm, globose, subglobose or obovate, mostly intercalary, sometimes lateral, sessile, or on a short stipe, with age in long chains or clusters, brown, thick-walled, smooth. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe from the soil, known only from the Netherlands. According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 886 samples from 43 studies, collected mainly in different types of soil, deadwood, and roots in forest, cropland, and grassland habitats. It occurs primarily in Europe (but absent in Scandinavia, France, and Spain) and Asia, seldom in Northern America and Africa. All but one site (Africa, St. Helena) are in the Northern Hemisphere. It is typical of temperate and subtropical climates and is absent in the tropics and boreal regions (MAT 10.5 °C, MAP 1 181 mm).

Notes: Chloridium elongatum was isolated from soil, and its wild type remains unknown. In culture, aerial mycelium is reduced or absent, and colonies appear mucoid. The soluble gold-ochre pigment was observed on the MLA. It is characterised by stout, bristle-like, subulately tapering chloridium-type conidiophores, longer phialides with an inflated conidiogenous locus protruding above the collarette, pale brown cuneiform conidia, and chlamydospores arranged in conspicuous chains.

Chloridium section Pseudophialocephala (M.S. Calabon et al.) Réblová, Hern.-Restr., M. Kolařík & F. Sklenar, comb. nov. MycoBank MB 846705.

Basionym: Pseudophialocephala M.S. Calabon et al., Mycosphere 13: 502. 2022.

Type species: Chloridium cuneatum (N.G. Liu et al.) Réblová & Hern.-Restr.

Description: Colonies effuse, hairy or finely bristle-like, dark brown to black, with olivaceous brown to brown conidial masses; composed of conidiophores. Asexual morph. The phialocephala-type conidiophores absent or present, macronematous, mononematous, solitary or fasciculate, erect, straight or slightly flexuous, composed of a penicillately branched head and a stipe that is cylindrical to subulate, stout, basal cell slightly inflated or a thick-walled true foot cell, brown, sometimes proliferating and with a lateral branch. Conidiogenous apparatus is compact, with dense penicillate branching, consisting of several levels of branches, metulae, and conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, terminal, integrated, paler than the conidiophore, conidiogenous locus sometimes protruding beyond the collarette, rarely with minute annellations; collarettes short, flaring, usually inconspicuous. Conidia, obovate to ellipsoidal, rarely cuneiform, subhyaline becoming pale brown after detachment, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in heads. The pseudogliomastix-type conidiophores absent or present, semimacronematous or micronematous with a loosely penicillately branched head or reduced to scattered phialides on undifferentiated hyphae, solitary, erect or slightly decumbent. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, terminal, integrated, hyaline to subhyaline; collarettes short, flaring, often inconspicuous. Conidia ellipsoidal, sometimes with a basal scar, hyaline to subhyaline, becoming olivaceous brown, accumulating in heads or irregularly shaped creamy to white grey slime. Chlamydospores absent. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Notes: The analysed species formed a strongly supported clade with five subclades in ML/BI analyses but without statistical support; only the subclade containing three Dutch soil isolates was supported in the ML analysis. The STACEY analysis indicated that the analysed strains form a single species. Because the available molecular data, mostly ITS and LSU sequences, cannot resolve interspecific variation in this section, the individual subclades are retained as the current species pending future research. The three unnamed soil isolates are introduced as Chloridium sp. The synopsis key with salient phenotypic characters is presented below (Table 6).

Table 6.

A synopsis table of Chloridium section Pseudophialocephala.

Taxon Growth1 Conidiophores Size2 Basal cell Phialides Size CG locus Conidia Size Colour Shape Soluble pigment Ref.3
Chloridium humicola C300–800 × 4–6.5lobed or with a true foot cell9–13 × 1–22.5–3.5 × 2–2.5hyaline/subhyaline becoming pale brownobovate to ellipsoidalnone1
NS150–260 × 5–8n/a6–9 × 1–1.52–4 × 2pale brownobovate to ellipsoidal2
Chloridium costaricense C210–800(–1100) × 4.5–6slightly inflated to bulbous7–11 × 2–2.5protruding with annellations3–3.5(–4) × 2–2.5subhyaline becoming pale brownobovate to ellipsoidalnone1
Chloridium cuneatum NSup to 300 × 5–7inflated at the basen/a2.5–4 × 2–3.5hyalinecuneate, rhomboid or shield-shapedn/a3
Chloridium aquaticum NS316–415 × 2.8–10.6inflated at the basen/a3.4–5.5 × 1.1–2.7hyalineobvoidn/a4
Chloridium sp.C58–480 × 3–7.5slightly inflated to bulbousn/a6.5–13.5 × 2–2.5subhyaline becoming pale brownobovoid to ellipsoidalpink-brown1

1 Growth: (NS) on natural substrate, (C) in culture.

2 Size is given in μm.

3 References: (1) This study, (2) Rao & de Hoog (1986), (3) Manawasinghe et al. (2022), (4) Wei et al. (2020).

(n/a) character not available.

Chloridium aquaticum M.J. Wei & H. Zhang, Phytotaxa 362: 192. 2018.

Synonym: Pseudophialocephala aquatica (M.J. Wei & H. Zhang) M.S. Calabon et al., Mycosphere 13: 508. 2022.

For a description and illustration, see Wei et al. (2018).

Habitat and geographical distribution: This species was described on submerged unidentified wood and is known from Thailand. For distribution according to GlobalFungi, see notes for Chl. humicola.

Notes: Chloridium aquaticum was described with ellipsoidal to cylindrical conidia 3.4–5.5 × 1.1–2.7 μm; however, the illustration accompanying the protologue shows obovate conidia somewhat truncate at the base (Wet et al. 2018, fig. 3). In the multilocus phylogeny, it formed a separate lineage (ML/BI), or it was inferred as a member of a clade including three unknown strains of Chloridium sp. (STACEY). Although we accept this species, morphological study of additional strains and DNA sequences of coding loci are required to distinguish it from other species.

Chloridium costaricense (G. Weber et al.) Réblová & Hern.-Restr., comb. nov. MycoBank MB 846727. Fig. 54, ,5555.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g054.jpg

Chloridium costaricense. A, B. Colonies composed of phialocephala-type conidiophores. C, D. Phialocephala-type conidiophores. E–G. Conidiogenous apparatus (arrows indicate conidiogenous locus with minute annellations protruding above the collarette). H, I. Basal cells of the conidiophore. J, K. Conidia. A–K. On OA. Scale bars: A, B = 250 μm; C = 50 μm; D, H, I = 20 μm; E–G, J, K = 10 μm.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g055.jpg

Diversity of colony morphology in Chloridium spp. on CMD, MLA, OA, PCA after 4 wk. A, B. Chl. humicola. C. Chl. costaricense. D–F. Chloridium sp. Images: A. CBS 420.73; B. CBS 218.86; C. CBS 409.94; D. CBS 149050; E. CBS 148972. F. CBS 148973. Scale bar = 1 cm.

Basionym: Leptographium costaricense G. Weber et al., Mycol. Res. 100: 733. 1996.

Synonyms: Chloridium terricola Yong Wang bis et al., Mycotaxon 132: 80. 2017 [2016].

Pseudophialocephala terricola (Yong Wang bis et al.) M.S. Calabon et al., Mycosphere 13: 509. 2022.

Chloridium paucisetosum K.Y. Wang et al., Phytotaxa 549: 71. 2022.

For a description and further illustrations, see Weber et al. (1996).

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 58–63 mm diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, velvety, cobwebby at the margin, camel to pale ochre-brown, reverse pale brown. On MLA: colonies 75–78 mm diam, circular, slightly raised, lanose, floccose, somewhat funiculose centrally, white-beige, cinnamon brown to brown towards the periphery, reverse brown. On OA: colonies 85–90 mm diam, circular, flat, margin indistinct, mucoid, smooth, aerial mycelium reduced or absent, milky, with individual heavily sporulating conidiophores with dark brown glossy heads that soon turn into slime on the surface of the agar, reverse of the same colour. On PCA: colonies 57–60 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, mucoid, smooth, locally cobwebby, with individual sporulating conidiophores with dark brown glossy heads that soon turn into slime on the surface of the agar, beige centrally, pale brown towards the margin, reverse pale brown. Sporulation was moderate on OA and PCA, absent on CMD and MLA.

Specimen examined: Costa Rica, Sarapiqui, Biological Station of “La Selva”, isolated from roots of Magnolia sambuensis, Mar. 1992, G. Weber (culture ex-type of L. costaricense CBS 409.94 = MAFF 237157 = GW-CR-243).

Habitat and geographical distribution: The species was isolated from the soil and also the roots of Magnolia sambuensis. It is known from China and Costa Rica (Weber et al. 1996, Wang et al. 2017, Wei et al. 2022). For distribution according to GlobalFungi, see notes for Chl. humicola.

Notes: Chloridium costaricense is characterised by hyaline conidiogenous apparatus that become partially pigmented in older cultures and a conidiogenous locus extending beyond the collarette, developing minute annellations after each conidium. The ML/BI analyses confirmed that the ex-type strains of Chl. paucisetosum (Wei et al. 2022) and Chl. terricola (Wang et al. 2017) clustered in a subclade with Chl. costaricense (Weber et al. 1996). Both former species are transferred to Chl. costaricense as facultative synonyms. Although Wei et al. (2022, fig. 3) did not describe the conidiogenous locus of Chl. paucisetosum, the photograph of phialides accompanying the protologue clearly shows conidiogenous locus protruding above the collarette with delicate annellations.

Chloridium cuneatum (N.G. Liu et al.) Réblová & Hern.-Restr., comb. nov. MycoBank MB 846728.

Basionym: Pseudophialocephala cuneata N.G. Liu et al., Mycosphere 13: 504, 2022.

For a description and illustration, see Manawasinghe et al. (2022).

Habitat and geographical distribution: It was collected on decaying wood and is known from Thailand. For distribution according to GlobalFungi, see notes for Chl. humicola.

Notes: Chloridium cuneatum differs from other species in the section Pseudophialocephala by cuneate, rhomboid, or shield-shaped conidia (Manawasinghe et al. 2022). The hyaline colour may be associated with the early stage of colony development. For distribution according to GlobalFungi, see notes for Chl. humicola.

Chloridium humicola (S.C. Jong & E.E. Davis) K.Y. Wang et al., Phytotaxa 549: 72. 2022. Fig. 54, ,5656.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g056.jpg

Chloridium humicola. A–D. Colonies composed of phialocephala-type conidiophores. E. Colony composed of pseudogliomastix-type conidiophores. F–I. Phialocephala-type conidiophores. J, K. Basal cells of the conidiophore. L. Conidia (phialocephala-type). M. Conidia (pseudogliomastix-type). N. Pseudogliomastix-type conidiophores. A, D, F, L–N. On MLA. B, G–I. On CMD. C, E, J, K. On OA. Images: A, D, F, J–L. CBS 218.86; B, C, E, G–I, M, N. CBS 420.73. Scale bars: A–E = 250 μm; F–I = 50 μm; J, K, N = 20 μm; L, M = 10 μm.

Basionym: Phialocephala humicola S.C. Jong & E.E. Davis, Mycologia 64: 1352. 1973 [1972].

Synonyms: Pseudophialocephala humicola (S.C. Jong & E.E. Davis) M.S. Calabon et al., Mycosphere 13: 507. 2022.

Phialocephala gabalongii Sivasith., Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 64: 335. 1975.

Phialocephala xalapensis Persiani & Maggi, Mycotaxon 20: 253. 1984.

Pseudophialocephala xalapensis (Persiani & Maggi) M.S. Calabon et al., Mycosphere 13: 510. 2022.

For descriptions and illustrations, see Jong & Davis (1972), Maggi & Persiani (1984), Rao & de Hoog (1986).

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 68–70 mm diam after 28 d, circular, flat to slightly raised, margin entire, submerged, mucoid, smooth, colony centre, with abundant dark olivaceous brown slime containing conidia produced on bristle-like conidiophores, milky to isabelline towards the margin, reverse of the same colour. On MLA: colonies 76–77 mm diam after 28 d, circular, flat margin entire to weakly undulate, submerged, colonies velvety, mucoid and partly funiculose centrally, sometimes zonate, whitish beige centrally, dark brown towards the margin with abundant dark olivaceous brown slime containing conidia, beige at the margin, sometimes ochre-brown towards the margin, reverse dark brown with a beige margin. On OA: colonies 68–70 mm diam after 28 d, circular, flat, margin entire, mucoid to cobwebby, colony centre pale pink-brown to ivory, dark brown at the margin, with abundant olivaceous brown slime containing conidia, reverse pale brown, dark brown at the margin. On PCA: colonies 58–60 mm diam after 28 d, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, sparsely velvety, mucoid at the margin, pale beige grey, colony centre dark brown, with abundant dark olivaceous brown slime containing conidia, reverse of the same colour. Sporulation was abundant on all media. Growth at 10–30 °C with an optimum at 25 °C.

Additional specimens examined: Canada, Ontario, Ottawa-Carleton, Ottawa, CEF, stem of Glycine max below the soil line, plant killed by herbicides, 29 Jul. 1998, K.A. Seifert K.A.S. 516 (CBS 113449 = DAOM 226654). India, Karnataka, Jog Falls, on a rotten twig, Oct. 1985, V. Rao (CBS-H 3860, CBS 218.86). USA, New Jersey, Cape May, isolated from soil, summer 1971, collector unknown (culture ex-type of P. humicola CBS 420.73 = ATCC 22801).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Chloridium humicola is a predominantly soil species, although it also occurs on decaying bark and wood or submerged leaf blades of Spartina sp. It is widespread throughout the world. Published records come from Australia, Canada, China, Germany, India, Japan, Mexico, Thailand, and the USA (Jong & Davis 1972, Sivasithamparam 1975, Maggi & Persiani 1984, Rao & de Hoog 1986, Kiyuna et al. 2012, Manawasinghe et al. 2022, Wu & Diao 2022, this study). According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences representing Chl. humicola, but also all other species of the section Pseudophialocephala, were found in 3 287 samples from 174 studies, collected mainly in soil (topsoil, bulk soil, and rhizosphere soil) and sediment, but also in the litter, deadwood, and roots. It is common in forests, but compared to other species, it is also often found in cropland, grassland, and wet habitats (wetland, freshwater, and marine habitats). It appears widespread in all climatic zones and is typical of temperate, subtropical, or tropical climates. However, it is almost absent in the boreal regions of Europe and Northern America (MAT 13.1 °C, MAP 1 151 mm).

Notes: Although the ex-type strain of Chl. humicola CBS 420.73 was described with ellipsoidal, hyaline conidia (Jong & Davis 1972), its examination revealed that conidia are obovate to ellipsoidal, hyaline to subhyaline becoming pale brown after detachment, and the base of the conidiophore contains a true foot cell. This is consistent with observations of the other strains of Chl. humicola examined in this study (see also Maggi & Persiani 1984). Jong & Davis (1975) reduced P. gabalongii to the synonymy of P. humicola.

Rao & de Hoog (1986) were the first to observe pseudogliomastix-type conidiophores in OA culture of the strain CBS 218.86, identified as P. xalapensis (Maggi & Persiani 1984). These hyaline to subhyaline, semimacronematous, or micronematous conidiophores represent a somewhat simplified form compared to the main phialocephala-type conidiophores. The pseudogliomastix-type conidiophores formed abundantly on MLA and OA and were later accompanied by the bristle-like phialocephala-type conidiophores.

Chloridium sp. CBS 149050, CBS 148972, CBS 148973. Fig. 54, ,5757.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g057.jpg

Chloridium sp. A–C. Colonies composed of phialocephala-type conidiophores. D, E. Colony composed of pseudogliomastix-type conidiophores. F–H. Phialocephala-type conidiophores. I. Conidia (pseudogliomastix-type). J. Conidia (phialocephala-type). K–N. Pseudogliomastix-type conidiophores. A–C, F, G. On PCA. D, E, I, L–N. On MLA. H, J, K. On OA. Scale bars: A–E = 250 μm; F, G, N = 20 μm; H, M = 50 μm; I–L = 10 μm.

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 75–77 mm diam, circular, flat, margin entire, mucoid, smooth, locally cobwebby, milky, with a brown ring of aggregated, heavily sporulating conidiophores producing conidia in glossy brown slime at the margin, reverse beige. On MLA: colonies 70–72 mm diam, circular, raised, margin entire to fimbriate, furrowed, velvety-lanose, floccose, sometimes whitish centrally, olivaceous brown, dark cinnamon brown at the margin, ochre to rusty pigment diffusing into the agar, reverse dark brown to amber. On OA: colonies 74–76 mm diam, circular, flat, margin fimbriate, mucoid with small white patches of aerial mycelium, zonate, milky to beige, dark brown at the margin, pale ochre to peach pigment diffusing into agar, reverse of the same colour. On PCA: colonies 69–75 mm diam, circular, slightly raised, margin fimbriate, lanose, floccose, whitish to yellow-white centrally, brown to olivaceous brow with a cinnamon brown outer zone, sometimes mucoid and creamy with a conspicuous isabelline submerged margin, pink-brown pigment diffusing into agar or pigment absent, reverse beige to brown. Sporulation was abundant on CMD, OA and PCA.

Description in culture: On PCA, vegetative hyphae 1–3 μm wide, branched, septate, hyaline to subhyaline, smooth, with funiculate projections consisting of brown, aerial hyphae ca. 1.5 μm wide, septate, tightly attached to each other in bundles. Asexual morph. The phialocephala-type conidiophores typically 58–176 × 3–4.5 μm, longer conidiophores 238–480 × 5–7.5 μm appear after prolonged incubation (>8 wk), arising from immersed hyphae, macronematous, mononematous, solitary or fasciculate, erect, straight or slightly flexuous, composed of a penicillately branched head and a stipe that is cylindrical to subulate, stout, base slightly inflated, brown, sometimes proliferating. Conidiogenous apparatus compact, with dense penicillate branching, consisting of 1–3 irregular levels of pale brown branches, conidiogenous cells arising in groups of 3–5 from the tip of metulae. Sometimes a lateral branch is formed bearing additional branches with phialides. Conidiogenous cells 6.5–13.5 × 2–2.5 μm tapering to 1–1.5 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, cylindrical, integrated, terminal, subhyaline, extending percurrently; collarettes short, inconspicuous. Conidia 3–4(–4.5) × 2–2.5 μm (mean ± SD = 3.4 ± 0.3 × 2.3 ± 0.2 μm), ellipsoidal to obovate, subhyaline becoming pale brown, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in brown, slimy glossy heads. The pseudogliomastix-type conidiophores 21–38 × 2–3 μm, arising from aerial hyphae, semimacronematous or micronematous, solitary, mostly composed of a short hyaline to subhyaline stipe and metulae with 1–3 groups of phialides, subhyaline, later elongated, pigmented. Conidiogenous cells 9–14 × 2–3 μm tapering to 1–2 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, cylindrical, integrated, terminal, hyaline or subhyaline; collarettes 2.5–3.5 μm wide, ca. 0.5 μm deep, hyaline, flaring, visible as two small flaps. Conidia 3.5–4.5 × 2–2.5(–3) μm (mean ± SD = 3.7 ± 0.3 × 2.4 ± 0.2 μm), mostly obovate, sometimes with a basal scar, subhyaline, smooth, accumulating in brown, slimy, glossy heads or irregularly shaped creamy to white grey slime. Chlamydospores absent. Sexual morph. unknown.

Specimens examined: The Netherlands, Gelderland Province, Zoelen, isolated from soil, 2017, S. & M. Flipsen (CBS 149050 = JW43010); South Holland Province, Katwijk en Zee, Lentevreugd (Grassland), isolated from soil, 12 Jul. 2021, V. Merkx, E. Duijm, M. Ventayol, M. Hernández-Restrepo & S. van Melis (CBS 148973 = SPC96.1); South Holland Province, Katwijk en Zee, Berkheide (Dunes), isolated from soil, 3. Aug. 2021, V. Merkx, J. Nuytinck & S. van Melis (CBS 148972 =SPC106.16).

Habitat and geographical distribution: A soil species known from the Netherlands. For distribution according to GlobalFungi, see notes for Chl. humicola.

Notes: Chloridium sp. is represented by three strains in our analysis; all were isolated from soil collected at different locations in the Netherlands. In culture, conidiophores are shorter (58–176 μm) compared to those of other species in this section. However, after prolonged incubation, we observed taller (238–480 μm) conidiophores, solitary or arising in fascicles among the shorter ones. The base of conidiophores is slightly inflated; the true foot cell observed in Chl. humicola is absent. It is the only species of the Pseudophialocephala sections that produces soluble pigments.

The pseudogliomastix-type conidiophores known so far in Chl. humicola were observed on MLA; they grew abundantly in the absence of the phialocephala-type conidiophores. However, after prolonged incubation, they also appeared on OA, growing from small white patches of aerial hyphae. These patches grew among aging phialocephala-type conidiophores that arise from the submerged hyphae. The hyaline to subhyaline stipe of the pseudogliomastix-type conidiophores becomes pigmented, septate, bearing more branches, and conidia adhere in a pale brown slimy mass.

Chloridium section Volubilia Réblová, Hern.-Restr., M. Kolařík & F. Sklenar, sect. nov. MycoBank MB 846702.

Etymology: Volûbilis (Latin) turns around, referring to the coiled apices of setae and conidiophores.

Type species: Chloridium volubile Réblová & Hern.-Restr.

Description: Colonies effuse, hairy, brown, whitish grey, and powdery when sporulating; composed of conidiophores. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores solitary or caespitose, unbranched. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, terminal, integrated. Conidia obovate to ellipsoidal, accumulating in heads. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores solitary or crowded, the main stalk is unbranched, brown, subulate, with a sterile setiform extension, apex straight, flexuous, uncinate or circinate. In the nodes grow collar-like hyphae from which arise phialides and setae. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, discrete, borne on a collar-like hypha in whorls in the lower part of the conidiophore, occasionally extending percurrently, sometimes sympodially (in culture), paler than the conidiophore; collarettes flaring, inconspicuous. Conidia ellipsoidal, hyaline, accumulating in heads or cirrhi. Chlamydospores absent. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Key to accepted species

1a. Conidia on the chloridium-type conidiophores 3.5–4.2 × 2.5–3.5 μm ............................................................................................................................................................... Chl. shangsiense

1b. Conidia on the chloridium-type conidiophores (4–)4.5–5 × 2–2.5 μm ............................................................................................................................................................... Chl. volubile

Chloridium shangsiense W.P. Wu & Y.Z. Diao, Fungal Diversity 116: 251. 2022.

For a description and illustration, see Wu & Diao (2022).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe on decaying wood from China (Wu & Diao 2022). According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 3 314 samples from 71 studies, collected mainly in topsoil, less frequently in bulk soil, deadwood, litter, roots, sediments, shoots, or water, typically in forests but also in many other biomes (woodland, shrubland, grassland, wetland, aquatic or anthropogenic). It occurs worldwide except Antarctica, in all climatic regions except the xeric areas. It is one of the few species common in colder regions such as boreal and tundra (MAT 10.3 °C, MAP 1 344 mm).

Notes: Chloridium shangsiense is the closest relative to Chl. volubile. It was described with the chloridium-type conidiophores only (Wu & Diao 2022), although the gonytrichum-type conidiophores are common in this section and were present in all specimens of Chl. volubile in culture and on the natural substrate. Therefore, both species can be compared by only a limited number of characters; Chl. shangsiense differs from Chl. volubile in somewhat broader conidia (3.5–4.2 × 2.5–3.5 μm, Wu & Diao 2022) formed on the chloridium-type conidiophores. Similar to Chl. volubile, the chlamydospores of Chl. shangsiense form in short chains of two cells.

Chloridium volubile Réblová & Hern.-Restr., sp. nov. MycoBank MB 846716. Fig. 58, ,5959.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g058.jpg

Chloridium volubile. A, B. Colonies composed of chloridium- and gonytrichum-type conidiophores. C, J. Chloridium-type conidiophores. D. Conidia (chloridium-type). E, F, I, N, P. Gonytrichum-type conidiophores. G, K, L. Conidia (gonytrichum-type). H, M. Collar-like hyphae with phialides and setae. O. Chlamydospores. A–I. From nature. J. On CMD. K–O. On MLA. P. On CMA with Urtica stems. Images: A–I. PRA-21364; J–N, O. CBS 144661; P. ICMP 22557. Scale bars: A, B = 250 μm; C, E, F, I, N, P = 50 μm; D, G, K, L, O = 10 μm; J, M, H = 20 μm.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g059.jpg

Diversity of colony morphology in Chloridium volubile on CMD, MLA, OA, PCA after 4 wk. A. CBS 144661. B. ICMP 22553. C. ICMP 22554. D. ICMP 22555. E. ICMP 22557. Scale bar = 1 cm.

Etymology: Volûbilis (Latin) turns around, derived from volvo (I turn around, I roll), referring to the coiled (circinate) apices of setae and conidiophores.

Typus: Czech Republic, South Bohemian Region, Novohradské hory Mts., Dobrá voda, Hojná voda National Nature Monument, alt. 850 m, on decaying wood of Picea abies, 29 Sep. 2017, M. Réblová M.R. 3910 (holotype PRA-21364, culture ex-type CBS 144661 = IMI 506816).

Description on the natural substrate: Colonies effuse, hairy, brown, whitish grey and powdery when sporulating; composed of conidiophores. Asexual morph. The chloridium-type conidiophores 158–279 × 3–4(–4.5) μm, macronematous, solitary or caespitose, erect, straight or flexuous, unbranched, septate, dark brown, paler towards the apex. Conidiogenous cells 37–40 × 2.5–3.5 μm, tapering to ca. 2 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, integrated, terminal, extending percurrently, subcylindrical, pale brown, subhyaline towards the apex; collarettes ca. 4 μm wide, 1.5 μm deep, flaring. Conidia (4–)4.5–5 × 2–2.5 μm (mean ± SD = 4.6 ± 0.3 × 2.4 ± 0.2 μm), obovate to ellipsoidal, hyaline, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in slimy whitish heads. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores 325–455 × 4.5–6(–7) μm, macronematous, solitary or crowded, erect, straight, septate, the main stalk is unbranched, cylindrical to slightly subulate, dark brown, pale brown to subhyaline towards the apex, apex sterile, flexuous, uncinate or circinate. The collar-like hyphae grow in every other node and give rise to phialides and lateral setae. Setae 62–262 × 3–3.5(–4) μm, similar to the main stalk, 1−3 primary setae grow from the collar-like hyphae, directed upwards, sometimes secondary and tertiary setae are formed, tapering subulately; setae of the last level are sterile, apex hyaline, straight, flexuous or uncinate. Apices of the conidiophores and setae are intricately intertwined, adhere to each other and are difficult to separate. Conidiogenous cells 7–13.5 × 3–4.5 μm, tapering to 1–2 μm below the collarette, monophialidic, subulate, in 4–7 whorls located in the lower half of the conidiophore at intervals of 23–41 μm below the septa (internodes are 11–20 μm), in groups of 3–7, discrete, sessile or on a supporting cell or short stalk, pale brown, subhyaline towards the apex; collarettes ca. 2 μm wide, 1 μm deep, flaring. Conidia 3.5–4.5 × 2–2.5 μm (mean ± SD = 3.8 ± 0.3 × 2.3 ± 0.2 μm), ellipsoidal, slightly tapering towards ends, hyaline, aseptate, smooth, accumulating in slimy whitish cirrhi or heads. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Culture characteristics: On CMD: colonies 34–36 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin entire, cobwebby to lanose, locally mucoid, creamy, brown-beige at the centre, reverse of the same colour. On MLA: colonies 49–56 mm in diam, circular, flat or slightly convex, margin entire, velvety-lanose, somewhat floccose, mucoid at the margin, whitish beige, mouse grey centrally, olivaceous beige at the margin; reverse of the same colour. On OA: colonies 52–54 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin entire, mucoid, partially cobwebby, whitish to isabelline, sometimes dark grey centrally due to aggregated conidiophores, reverse grey. On PCA: colonies 49–56 mm in diam, circular, flat, margin entire, sparsely lanose becoming mucoid, creamy-beige, cocoa brown centrally due to aggregated conidiophores, reverse creamy with grey spots. Sporulation was abundant on all media. Growth at 5–30 °C with an optimum at 25 °C.

Description in culture: On OA, vegetative hyphae 2–3.5 μm diam, branched, septate, subhyaline, smooth. Asexual morph. Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia are similar to those on the natural substrate. The chloridium-type conidiophores 110–198 × 3–4 μm. Conidiogenous cells 36–42 × 2.5–3 μm, tapering to 2–2.5 μm below the collarette, the meristematic tip is protruding beyond the collarette up to 10 μm; collarettes ca. 3.5 μm wide, 1.5 μm deep, flaring. Conidia (3.5–)4–5 × 2–2.5 μm (mean ± SD = 4.3 ± 0.3 × 2.3 ± 0.2 μm), ellipsoidal to obovate, hyaline, smooth, accumulating in white heads. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores 263–430 × 3–3.5 μm, septate, apex sterile, straight or circinate, occasionally developing into a phialide. Setae 132–263(–378) × 2–2.5 μm, 1–3 primary setae arise from collar-like hyphae, secondary and tertiary setae are also formed; setae of the last level are sterile, mostly straight. Conidiogenous cells 10–15(–17) × 3–4 μm, tapering to 1–2 μm below the collarette, extending percurrently, in 4–6 whorls located in every other node at intervals 22–35 μm below the septa (internodes are 9–20 μm), in group of 3–6(–7), discrete; collarettes ca. 2 μm wide, 1 μm deep. Conidia 3.5–4.5(–5) × 2–3 μm (mean ± SD = 4.3 ± 0.3 × 2.5 ± 0.2 μm), ellipsoidal, slightly tapering towards the ends, accumulating in slimy whitish heads or cirrhi. Chlamydospores 4.5–6(–6.5) × 4.5–6.5 μm, subglobose or ellipsoidal, mostly intercalary, sometimes terminal or lateral, brown, usually in a chain of 2–several cells, smooth, thick-walled. Sexual morph. Unknown.

Additional specimens examined: New Zealand, West Coast Region, Westland District, Mount Aspiring National Park, Rouring Billy track, 26 km E of Haast, on decaying bark and wood of Nothofagus sp., 22 Mar. 2005, M. Réblová M.R. 3315/NZ 586 (PDD 120401, ICMP 22553); ibid., on decaying wood, M. Réblová M.R. 3316/NZ 587 (PDD 120402, ICMP 22554); ibid., on decaying wood, M. Réblová M.R. 3317/NZ 588 (ICMP 22555); West Coast Region, Westland District, Mount Aspiring National Park, Mt. Shrimpton track, 1km N of National Park Headquarters in Makarora, on decaying wood of Nothofagus sp., 24 Mar. 2005, M. Réblová M.R. 3330/NZ 602 (PDD 120403, ICMP 22556); ibid., M. Réblová M.R. 3337/NZ 609 (PDD 120404, ICMP 22557).

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe on decaying bark and wood of Nothofagus sp., Picea abies, and other unknown hosts, known from the Czech Republic and New Zealand. According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 3 559 samples from 91 studies, collected mainly in different types of soil, deadwood and roots in forests worldwide (except Africa and Antarctica). It occurs in all climatic zones, including colder areas (MAT 10.1 °C, MAP 1 348 mm).

Notes: The conidia produced on chloridium- and gonytrichum- types conidiophores slightly varied. The predominant shape of conidia formed on the chloridium-type conidiophores in culture was obovate, whereas conidia were mostly ellipsoidal to somewhat obovate from nature. On the other hand, conidia formed on the gonytrichum-type conidiophores were always ellipsoidal. We observed a slight difference in the size of gonytrichum-type conidiophores in vitro. On MLA, conidiophores (94–237 μm long) and setae (82–175 μm long) were significantly shorter than those observed on OA (see above), which had almost the same length as on the natural substrate.

When young, Chl. volubile could be confused with Chl. fuscum. Although the two species are not shown to be closely related in the phylogenetic tree, they are very similar to each other. When young, they share hyaline ellipsoidal conidia. Their conidiophores are subulately tapering with upright-directed setae, with coiled or uncinate apices. Chloridium volubile, however, differs from the Chl. fuscum by conidia that remain hyaline at maturity, whorls of phialides that arise on every other node, and morphology of setae. Setae are not restricted to the upper nodes but grow from the first whorl of phialides near the base of the conidiophore; they are similar to the central stalk and bear whorls of phialides in their lower parts. In Chl. fuscum, the apex of the conidiophore is straight and sterile, sometimes fertile, lateral setae remain sterile without collar-like hyphae, and their apices are uncinate or circinate. In Chl. volubile, the apex of the main stalk is circinate, and the setae are more or less circinate, but bear collar-like hyphae.

Other Chloridium species

Two earlier sections of the genus Chloridium, i.e. Gongromeriza, and Psilobotrys, have been confirmed to be distantly related to Chl. virescens and to each other (Fig. 2). Therefore, we propose reinstating their former generic status. Species originally referred to these two sections are now placed in the genera Chaetosphaeria, Fusichloridium, Gongromeriza, Gongromerizella, and Psilobotrys. The newly acquired strains, DNA sequence data, and comparative morphology of species belonging to these genera are beyond the scope of the current research. They will be published in a separate study (Réblová et al., in prep.).

Fusichloridium W.P. Wu & Y.Z Diao, Fungal Diversity 116: 282. 2022.

Type species: Fusichloridium cylindrosporum (W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.) Réblová

Fusichloridium cylindrosporum (W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.) Réblová, comb. nov. MycoBank MB 846729.

Basionym: Chloridium cylindrosporum W. Gams & Hol.-Jech., Stud. Mycol. 13: 46. 1976.

Synonyms: Chaetopsis cylindrospora (W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.) DiCosmo et al., Mycologia 75: 962. 1983.

Chaetosphaeria fusispora W. Gams & Hol.-Jech., Stud. Mycol. 13: 45. 1976. (Nom. illeg. Art. 53.1.) [non Chaetosphaeria fusispora (Kawamura) Hino, Bull. Miyazaki Coll. Agr. For. 4: 191. 1932, nec Chaetosphaeria fusispora P. Larsen, Dansk Bot. Ark. 14: 7. 1952.]

Chaetosphaeria fusiformis W. Gams & Hol.-Jech., Mycotaxon 13: 257. 1981.

Fusichloridium fusiforme W.P. Wu & Y.Z Diao, Fungal Diversity 116: 282. 2022.

Specimens examined: Czech Republic, Olomouc Region, Hrubý Jeseník Mts., on slopes of Mt. Mraveneèník near Louèná nad Desnou, on a decayed branch of Abies alba, 3 Aug. 1971, V. Holubová-Jechová (holotype of Chaetosphaeria fusispora = Ch. fusiforme PRM 794008); South Bohemia Region, Šumava Mts. National Park, Železná Ruda, glacial cirque of the lake Èerné jezero, on the inner surface of the bark of Abies alba, 27 Aug. 1997, M. Réblová M.R. 1048 (CBS 101429); ibid., M.R. 1049 (CBS 101430). Ukraine, Eastern Carpathian Mts., Kvasi near Rachiv, on the left bank of the Tisa River, on the inner side of bark on a stump of Abies alba, 26 Jun. 1997, M. Réblová M.R. 949.

Notes: The species was initially assigned to the Psilobotrys section. Wu & Diao (2022) proposed the monotypic genus Fusichloridium for Chaetosphaeria fusiformis and its Chl. cylindrosporum asexual morph. However, the new species combination was erroneously based on Ch. fusiformis (Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1981), but the oldest available epithet at the species rank is “cylindrosporum” based on Chl. cylindrosporum (Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976). A new combination with the correct basionym is proposed in this study.

Gongromeriza Preuss, Linnaea 24: 106. 1851.

Synonym: Ejnerjensenia W.P. Wu & Y.Z. Diao, Fungal Diversity 116: 276. 2022.

Type species: Gongromeriza myriocarpa (Fr.) Réblová

Description: Colonies effuse, hairy, dark brown, whitish when sporulating; composed of conidiophores and ascomata. Asexual morph. Conidiophores solitary, scattered or crowded, unbranched, macronematous, several-septate with percurrent proliferations which give the conidiophore a characteristic geniculate appearance, or semimacronematous, consisting of simple phialides. Conidiogenous cells monophialidic with a single conidiogenous locus, terminal, integrated, extending percurrently, collarettes flaring, cup-, vase- or funnel-shaped. Conidia short-cuneate or dacryoid with a truncate base, hyaline or slightly pigmented, aseptate, in slimy heads or chains. Chlamydospores absent. Sexual morph. Ascomata perithecial, non-stromatic, dark brown, superficial, glabrous. Ostiole periphysate. Paraphyses present. Asci unitunicate, stipitate, with a non-amyloid apical annulus. Ascospores fusiform, hyaline, 1-septate.

Notes: The Gongromeriza section included nine highly variable species (Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976). Three of them (Chl. clavaeforme, Chl. lignicola, and Chl. pachytrachelum) and a similar species Chl. phaeophorum (Réblová & Gams 2011), were resolved as two separate monophyletic lineages remotely related to Chloridium. They represent Gongromeriza, whose generic status is restored, and the newly proposed genus Gongromerizella (see below). Gongromeriza is distinguished from Chloridium by cuneate to dacryoid conidia formed on a single conidiogenous locus, often adhering in the chain, terminal phialides with a conspicuous flaring, cup-, vase- or funnel-shaped collarette and fusiform, 1-septate, non-fragmenting ascospores.

Gongromeriza (Preuss 1851) was described as a monotypic genus based on G. clavaeformis, which was later transferred to Chloridium (Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976). Chloridium clavaeforme was experimentally verified as the asexual morph of Chaetosphaeria myriocarpa (Booth 1957). The correct epithet of the type species of Gongromeriza is ‘myriocarpa’ based on Sphaeria myriocarpa Fries 1823, the earliest available epithet at the species rank, while Chl. clavaeforme is reduced to synonymy. The second accepted species is G. pygmaea with Chl. phaeophorum as its asexual morph (Constantinescu et al. 1995). Wu & Diao (2022) described the genus Ejnerjensenia for Ch. myriocarpa, creating a synonym of Gongromeriza.

Gongromeriza myriocarpa (Fr.) Réblová, comb. nov. MycoBank MB 846730.

Basionym: Sphaeria myriocarpa Fr., Syst. Mycol. 2(2): 459. 1823.

Synonyms: Chaetosphaeria myriocarpa (Fr.) C. Booth, Mycol. Pap. 68: 5. 1957.

Rosellinia minima Fuckel & Nitschke, Jb. nassau. Ver. Naturk. 23–24: 149. 1870 [1869–70].

Trichosphaeria minima Bref., Bot. Unters. 10: tab. 6, figs 3–4. 1891.

Sphaeria ostioloidea Cooke, Grevillea 4(31): 113. 1876.

Zignoëlla ostioloidea (Cooke) Sacc., Syll. Fung. 2: 220. 1883.

Sphaeria stevensonii Berk. & Broome, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 5, 1: 30. 1878.

Melanomma stevensonii (Berk. & Broome) Sacc., Syll. Fung. 2: 104. 1883.

Gongromeriza clavaeformis Preuss, Linnaea 24: 106. 1851.

Chloridium clavaeforme (Preuss) W. Gams & Hol.-Jech. Stud. Mycol. 13: 31. 1976.

Catenularia heimii F. Mangenot, Rev. Gén. Bot. 59: 445. 1952. (Rech. méth. Champ. Bois Décomp. p. 25. 1952.)

Ejnerjensenia myriocarpa (Fr.) W.P. Wu & Y.Z Diao, Fungal Diversity 116: 278. 2022.

For full synonymy, see Booth (1957).

Specimens examined: France, locality unknown, on dead wood of Fagus sylvatica, date unknown, F. Mangenot (an authentic strain of Catenularia heimii CBS 141.53 = IMI 061296 = UPSC 3464). The Netherlands, Pijnenburg, on decaying wood, 19 Aug. 1972, W. Gams No. Pij 4 (culture ex-neotype of Chaetosphaeria myriocarpa CBS 264.76 = UPSC 3465).

Gongromeriza pygmaea (P. Karst.) Réblová, comb. nov. MycoBank MB 846731.

Basionym: Sphaeria pygmaea P. Karst., Fungi Fenniae Exsiccati, Fasc. 9: no. 875. 1869.

Synonyms: Zignoëlla pygmaea (P. Karst.) Sacc., Michelia 1: 346. 1878.

Psilosphaeria pygmaea (P. Karst.) Cooke, Grevillea 16(78): 50. 1887.

Chaetosphaeria pygmaea (P. Karst.) Constant. et al., Mycol. Res. 99: 590. 1995.

Phialophora phaeophora W. Gams, Stud. Mycol. 13: 65. 1976.

Chloridium phaeophorum (W. Gams) Réblová & W. Gams, Fungal Diversity 46: 83. 2011.

Ejnerjensenia pygmaea (P. Karst.) W.P. Wu & Y.Z. Diao, Fungal Diversity 116: 278. 2022.

Specimens examined: Czech Republic, South Bohemian Region, Novohradské hory Mts., Žofín National Nature Reserve, on decaying wood of Fagus sylvatica, 6 Aug. 1997, M. Réblová M.R. 967 (CBS 144786). The Netherlands, Berenkuil near Utrecht, on decaying twig of Fraxinus excelsior, May 1974, W. Gams (culture ex-type of Phialophora phaeophora CBS 699.74 = UPSC 3466).

Gongromerizella Réblová, gen. nov. MycoBank MB 846071.

Etymology: Gongromeriza and -ella (Latin) diminutive, referring to the similarity with the genus Gongromeriza.

Type species: Gongromerizella lignicola (F. Mangenot) Réblová

Description: Colonies effuse, hairy, dark brown, whitish when sporulating; composed of conidiophores and ascomata. Asexual morph. Conidiophores solitary, scattered or crowded, unbranched, macronematous, with percurrent proliferations. Conidiogenous cells monophialidic with a single conidiogenous locus and pronounced wall thickening, terminal, integrated, extending percurrently, collarettes flaring, funnel-shaped. Conidia ellipsoidal, hyaline, aseptate, in slimy heads. Chlamydospores absent. Sexual morph. Ascomata perithecial, non-stromatic, dark brown, superficial, glabrous. Ostiole periphysate. Paraphyses present. Asci unitunicate, stipitate, with a non-amyloid apical annulus. Ascospores fusiform, hyaline, 1-septate.

Notes: The genus Gongromerizella comprises three earlier Chloridium species. Their ex-type strains formed a strongly supported monophylum (100/1.0), unrelated to Chloridium and Gongromeriza (Fig. 2). Gongromerizella resembles Gongromeriza, but differs in having ellipsoidal conidia in slimy heads, phialides with a pronounced thickening around the collarette and robust, thick-walled conidiophores.

Gongromerizella lignicola (F. Mangenot) Réblová, comb. nov. MycoBank MB 846732.

Basionym: Bisporomyces lignicola F. Mangenot, Revue Mycol. 18(2): 136. 1953.

Synonym: Chloridium lignicola (F. Mangenot) W. Gams & Hol.-Jech., Stud. Mycol. 13: 37.1976.

Specimen examined: France, Argonne, Vallée Grand Rû, on the rotten trunk of Fagus sylvatica, 1953, F. Mangenot (culture ex-type of Bisporomyces lignicola CBS 143.54 = LCP 88.3536 = MUCL 1149).

Gongromerizella pachytrachela (W. Gams & Hol.-Jech) Réblová, comb. nov. MycoBank MB 846733.

Basionym: Chloridium pachytrachelum W. Gams & Hol.-Jech., Stud. Mycol. 13: 26. 1976.

Synonyms: Chaetosphaeria lentomita W. Gams & Hol.-Jech., Stud. Mycol. 13: 24. 1976.

Chaetosphaeria innumera Tul. & C. Tul. sensu C. Booth, Mycol. Pap. 68: 2. 1957. [non Ch. innumera Berk. & Br. ex Tul. & C. Tul. 1863.]

Specimen examined: Belgium, Ardennes, near Neupont, on decaying wood of Fagus sylvatica, Sep. 1975, W. Gams (culture ex-type of Chaetosphaeria lentomita and Chloridium pachytrachelum CBS 645.75).

Notes: The ex-type strain CBS 645.75 was derived from the ascospores of Chaetosphaeria lentomita and in culture yielded the asexual morph, Chl. pachytrachelum. Names of both morphs were proposed simultaneously based on this strain. Since both names are of equal priority at the species rank, Chl. pachytrachelum is selected as the basionym for the proposed combination in the genus Gongromerizella (Art. F.8.1, note 3 and Art. 11.5). Chaetosphaeria lentomita is transferred to its synonymy.

Gongromerizella pini (Crous & Akulov) Réblová, comb. nov. MycoBank MB 846734.

Basionym: Chloridium pini Crous & Akulov, Fungal Syst. Evol. 6: 182. 2020.

Psilobotrys (Sacc.) Sacc., Michelia 1: 538. 1879.

Synonym: Rhinotrichum Corda section Psilobotrys Sacc., Michelia 1: 87. 1877.

Type species: Psilobotrys minutus (Sacc.) Sacc. [as ‘minuta’], Michelia 1: 538. 1879.

Description: Colonies effuse, hairy, dark brown, white grey when sporulating; composed of conidiophores and ascomata. Asexual morph. Conidiophores solitary or caespitose, crowded, forming two layers, unbranched, macronematous. Conidiogenous cells mono- and polyphialidic with a single conidiogenous locus, extending percurrently and sympodially, collarettes flaring, shortly funnel-shaped. Conidia ellipsoidal to subglobose, hyaline, aseptate, in slimy heads or imbricate chains. Chlamydospores absent. Sexual morph. Ascomata perithecial, non-stromatic, superficial, glabrous. Ostiole periphysate. Paraphyses present. Asci unitunicate, stipitate, with a non-amyloid apical annulus. Ascospores fusiform, hyaline, transversely septate.

Notes: The Chloridium section Psilobotrys (Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976) was based on the genus Psilobotrys (Saccardo 1879), typified with P. minutus. It was proposed to accommodate two species, Chl. botryoideum and Chl. cylindrosporum. They differ from Chloridum s. str. in mono- and polyphialides with a single conidiogenous locus, oblong to cylindrical or ellipsoidal, hyaline, aseptate conidia adhering in imbricate chains or star-like heads, and absence of chlamydospores. Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) distinguished two varieties of Chl. botryoideum, which differed in shape and size of conidia; var. botryoideum with more or cylindrical conidia and var. minutum with subglobose to ellipsoidal conidia. According to Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976), both varieties should have an identical sexual morph, Chaetosphaeria innumera, the type of Chaetosphaeria.

A study of the holotypes of Fusidium botryoideum (Corda 1837) (DAOM 40962) and Rhinotrichum minutum (Saccardo 1877) (DAOM 41259) and phylogenetic analyses of several of their strains indicates that they are not congeneric. We analysed the ITS, LSU, and tef1-α loci of our two strains of Chl. botryoideum var. botryoideum (CBS 145639, M.R. 3736) and four strains of Chl. botryoideum var. minutum (CBS 223.74, CBS 247.75, CBS 600.75B, CBS 877.73) that were identified by Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976). In the preliminary analysis (results now shown), all isolates of var. minutum formed a strongly supported monophyletic lineage unrelated to the clade of Chaetosphaeria innumera/Chl. botryoideum var. botryoideum. This study included two strains of var. minutum (CBS 223.74 and CBS 247.75) and both isolates of var. botryoideum (Fig. 2).

Based on these results, we accept Psilobotrys as a separate genus, with P. minutus as the only representative. Chloridium botryoideum var. botryoideum is transferred to the synonymy of its sexual morph, Ch. innumera (Tulasne & Tulasne 1863). Chloridium cylindrosporum was transferred to the genus Fusichloridium (Wu & Diao 2022, this study).

Psilobotrys minutus (Sacc.) Sacc. [as ‘minuta’], Michelia 1: 538. 1879.

Basionym: Rhinotrichum minutum Sacc., Michelia 1: 87. 1877. Fungi ital. autogr. del. Tab. 62. 1877.

Synonyms: Chloridium minutum (Sacc.) Sacc., Syll. Fung. 4: 321. 1886.

Chloridium botryoideum var. minutum (Sacc.) W. Gams & Hol.-Jech., Stud. Mycol. 13: 43. 1976.

Specimens examined: Germany, Lower Saxony, Wolfenbüttel Districts, Elm near Schöppenstedt, on decaying twig of Fraxinus excelsior, Jan. 1975, W. Gams & K.H. Domsch (CBS 247.75). Italy, Province of Treviso, Veneto Region, forests of Montello Mt., on decaying wood of Quercus sp., Sep. 1874, P.A. Saccardo (holotype of Rhinotrichum minutum PAD, not seen; microscopic slide ex holotype DAOM 41259). The Netherlands, Buren, Isle of Ameland, on a dead twig of Acer pseudoplatanus, 28 Oct. 1973, W. Gams (CBS 223.74).

Excluded species or species of uncertain status

Chloridium culmicola W.P. Wu & Y.Z., Diao, Fungal Diversity 116: 236. 2022.

Habitat and geographical distribution: Saprobe on dead bamboo culm, known only from China (Wu & Diao 2022). According to GlobalFungi, identical sequences were found in 178 samples from 6 studies, collected mainly in topsoil, with a few records from bulk soil or roots, predominantly in forest biomes in Asia (China) and with a single record from Europe (Spain). Locations are usually in the humid temperate climatic region, with a few records in tropical and subtropical areas (Southern China) and Mediterranean (Southern Europe) (MAT 15.5 °C, MAP 1 363 mm).

Notes: For a description and illustration, see Wu & Diao (2022). Chloridium culmicola is characterised by solitary or fasciculate, unbranched conidiophores without collar-like hyphae, terminal phialides with a single aperture, and oblong-ellipsoidal conidia 4–5.6 × 2.2–2.5 μm accumulating in short or long chains (Wu & Diao 2022). The protologue did not give the observations in culture and further details on chlamydospore morphology. The species was illustrated based on observations from culture only; the conidial chains were not depicted.

Its placement in phylogenetic analyses varied. It appeared to be either basal to all species of Chloridium (Fig. 7) or not congeneric with Chl. virescens and clustered in a distantly related clade as a sister to Cacumisporium capitulatum (Supplementary Fig. S2). Given the ambiguous relationships, Chl. culmicola is a candidate for detailed scrutiny. Despite its questionable status, it was included in the Chloridium biogeographic analysis, and these data may be helpful for future taxonomic studies.

Chloridium virescens var. allantosporum Morgan-Jones et al., Mycotaxon 41: 462. 1991.

Notes: This variety was described from a single specimen collected on decaying wood in South Africa (Morgan-Jones et al. 1991). It was distinguished from Chl. virescens var. virescens by allantoid conidia and absence of chlamydospores. However, the presence/absence of chlamydospores is of taxonomic value in the genus Chloridium. All members of the Chloridium section form chlamydospores in vitro; therefore, their absence in the var. allantosporum may indicate affinity with another section. The systematic placement of Chl. virescens var. allantosporum is unknown, and its relationships need to be verified with molecular data. Unfortunately, no living strain was available for study.

Chloridium salinicola Dayar. & E.B.G. Jones, Mycosphere 11: 122. 2020.

Notes: Chloridium salinicola was collected on unidentified wood submerged in marine habitats in the United Kingdom (Dayarathne et al. 2020). The species has ellipsoidal to cylindrical, hyaline, 1-septate conidia borne on monophialidic conidiogenous cells on unbranched conidiophores. According to the accompanying illustration, the fungus also has polyblastic conidiogenous cells with visible apertures but without collarettes that likely disintegrated. Because of its very close resemblance to Cylindrotrichum, it is excluded from Chloridium.

Based on molecular data, it was placed in Chloridium (Dayarathne et al. 2020) as a sister to Chl. aquaticum. It is probable that the strain of Chl. salinicola was contaminated, or the culture was mislabelled. For more information, see Discussion.

Gonytrichum rubrum Pat., Bull. Soc. Mycol. France 7: 181. 1891.

Notes: The identity of this species remains disputed. Gonytrichum rubrum was collected on rotten roots of Anemone coronaria in Ecuador with intensely red conidiophores and yellow ovoid conidia (Patouillard & Lagerheim 1891). The authors stated that it resembles Chl. caesium. Hughes (1951) could not locate the type material of this species in the FH or PC herbaria. Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) included G. rubrum in the synonymy of G. caesium with a question mark. Still, the colour of the conidia and conidiophores does not match that of the latter species. The proposed synonymy is not accepted in this study.

Gonytrichum fulvum Ellis, N. Amer. Fung., Ser. 1: no. 657. 1881.

Specimen examined: USA, New Jersey, Newfield, on decaying leaves and culms of Antropogon, Sep., J.B. Ellis, North American Fungi Exsiccati, Ser. 1: no. 657 (ILLS).

Notes: Study of the herbarium material did not reveal the identity of this species. The presumed colony occurs in fragments on several parts of the dead leaf; it is superficial, creamy, and consists of star- and club-shaped sterile structures; conidia were not present.

Gonytrichum gilvum Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1: 105. 1844.

Notes: The species was collected on fallen branches of a fruit tree in Italy (Rabenhorst 1844). Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) reported that no material was preserved at the B herbarium. The species was described with globose yellowish conidia, which may indicate Chl. subglobosum or Chl. simile.

Gonytrichum luteoviride Torrend, Brotéria, Sér. Bot. 12(1): 68. 1914.

Note: Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) revised the type material and suggested that the species belong to the genus Oidiodendron.

Melanopsammella preussii (W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.) Réblová et al., Sydowia 51: 65. 1999.

Basionym: Chaetosphaeria preussii W. Gams & Hol.-Jech., Stud. Mycol. 13: 34. 1976.

Synonym: Chloridium preussii W. Gams & Hol.-Jech., Stud. Mycol. 13: 35. 1976.

Notes: Melanopsammella preussii superficially resembles other members of the genus in sexual characters (Melanopsammella = Chloridium), but it is distinguished by its asexual morph, which produces conidia on single conidiogenous loci. Preliminary phylogenetic analysis (Réblová et al., in prep.) indicates that M. preussii and Chl. virescens are not congeneric. The species is not accepted in Chloridium.

Mesobotrys fuscus var. brachycladus Sacc. [as “brachyclada”], Syll. Fung. 4: 324. 1886. Fungi ital. 26. 1877.

Notes: Saccardo (1886) described this variety from decorticated oak wood, with setiform, apically sterile conidiophores 300 × 2 μm and hyaline, ovoid conidia 2–2.5 × 1 μm. The illustration (Saccardo 1877) shows phialides arranged in verticils or solitary on the conidiophore. Based on these features, this taxon does not fit any species accepted in the Chloridium in this study. The type material was not available for study.

DISCUSSION

Generic boundaries and new infrageneric classification of Chloridium

The phylogenetic analysis of ITS, LSU, and tef1-α loci (Fig. 2) demonstrated that Chloridium is polyphyletic in Chaetosphaeriaceae and the original division into three morphological sections is not correlated with genetic relationships. From studies of the type species of Gongromeriza and Psilobotrys and the results of phylogenetic analyses, we conclude that there is no justification for maintaining the original concept of Chloridium. Therefore, we abolish the existing classification into three sections sensu Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976), and propose to restore the generic status of Gongromeriza and Psilobotrys. Polyphyly of Chloridium has been suggested in previous studies (e.g. Fernández & Huhndorf 2005, Fehrer et al. 2018, Luo et al. 2019, Crous et al. 2020, Hyde et al. 2020, Wu & Diao 2022). Although several species were redisposed to different genera in Chaetosphaeriales (Curvichaeta, Fusichloridium, Gongromerizella, Kylindrochaeta, and Phialogeniculata), Glomerellales (Phaeochloridium), Helotiales (Hyaloscypha) and Rhamphoriales (Xylolentia) (Fehrer et al. 2018, Wu & Diao 2022, this study), the placement of many other Chloridium spp. remains unknown due to the absence of living cultures and molecular data.

The genus Chloridium has emerged as a species-rich, monophyletic group comprising type species of the genera Bisporomyces, Cirrhomyces, Gonytrichum, Mesobotrys, and Pseudophialocephala (Fig. 5). While some of these synonymies have been proposed earlier, mainly as morphological hypotheses (Meyer 1959, Hughes 1951, 1958, Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976, Réblová et al. 2016), many of them are now supported by molecular data for the first time. Chloridium is presented as a monophyletic, polythetic genus with a revised concept.

Although the sexual characters are uniform, members of Chloridium manifest a significant variability in asexual features. To account for such variability and shared characters, we proposed eight sections, well supported by molecular and phenotypic data, instead of distinguishing individual monophyletic lineages into small closely related genera that share some morphological traits. Species of Chloridium have in common a rare mode of phialidic conidiogenesis on multiple loci, percurrently extending phialides with a flaring collarette and relatively small, aseptate conidia accumulating in slimy heads or cirrhi. The main differences between the sections are reflected in the combination of four conidiophore morphotypes, the shape and the colour of conidia, and the absence or presence of the chlamydospores and their position on vegetative hyphae. The ontogenetic system of conidial development was proposed by Hughes (1953) and subsequently refined by Tubaki (1958) and Barron (1968) and summarised in a formal concept (Kendrick 1971) that allowed an accurate description of conidial ontogeny and classification of conidial fungi. Based on these principles, conidial ontogeny was recognised as an important criterion in generic delimitation. Therefore, it is not surprising that genera such as Chloridium, Gonytrichum, and Pseudophialocephala, which have the same mode of rare conidiogenesis and similar conidial morphology, and have identical sexual morphs (if known), are closely related.

Based on the reconstruction of the ancestral state, we have a better idea of the evolution of morphological characters in the genus Chloridium. The ancestral type was a simple conidiophore (unbranched without collar-like hyphae), forming hyaline and ellipsoidal to oblong conidia on the terminal integrated phialides. All complex structures, such as branching of the conidiophore, collar-like hyphae, discrete phialides in the whorls, and pigmented conidia of different shapes, developed subsequently and independently in many lineages. The presence of chlamydospores seems to be always present in Metachloridium, Chloridium, Volubilia, Gonytrichum and Gonytrichopsis, but never in Cryptogonytrichum, Mesobotrys, and Pseudophialocephala. This shows that chlamydospores are phylogenetically stable, making them an important taxonomic marker.

Morphogenesis plays an essential role in the characteristics of conidiophores and conidia. It is the process by which a young conidiophore or conidium gradually acquires its final form. For example, the gonytrichum-type conidiophores (Fig. 14C–I) can imitate the chloridium-type (Fig. 14A, B). They begin growth as a simple unbranched structure with a terminal phialide but later develop the first collar-like hyphae in the nodes with discrete phialides producing more conidia and sometimes setae. After repeated transfers in vitro, the ability to form conidiophores of the Gonytrichum-type may be lost, and only chloridium-type conidiophores are present. In addition, the chloridium-type conidiophores, without further modification, co-exist with those of the gonytrichum-type, in culture or on the host, and are a part of the life cycle of species classified in the Gonytrichum, Gonytrichopsis and Volubilia sections. A similar case involving two conidiophore types in one life cycle that mimic each other is represented by the phialocephala- (Fig. 14J) and pseudogliomastix-types (Fig. 14K). They are characterised by a condensed branching system. The phialocephala-type conidiophores are stout, pigmented, and have a conspicuous, fertile head, referred to as a conidiogenous apparatus. The pseudogliomastix-type conidiophores have only loosely penicillately branched heads on a subhyaline supporting cell or a short stalk. They occur together in culture, or only one type is present. Also, conidia undergo specific changes during their ontogeny; especially, we observed a shift in colour at maturity (Pseudophialocephala) and during ageing (Chloridium) (see below).

Contrary to expectations, species forming chloridium-type conidiophores turned out to be paraphyletic. They were divided into three lineages corresponding to sections Chloridium, Cryptogonytrichum, and Metachloridium. The Chloridium section was represented by a single species Chl. virescens for almost 40 years (Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976); however, it was expanded to 17 species with molecular data (Fig. 7, Supplementary Fig. S1).

The generic concept of Gonytrichum, as circumscribed by Hughes (1951) and Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976), proved untenable. The amalgamation of Chloridium and Gonytrichum, two well-known genera that had existed separately for over a century, might have seemed somewhat radical (Réblová et al. 2016). However, molecular data support this hypothesis. Although species initially assigned to Gonytrichum are morphologically similar and demonstrably closely related, they formed four phylogenetically separated clusters, i.e. sections Gonytrichopsis, Gonytrichum, Mesobotrys, and Volubilia. They are defined phylogenetically and by the morphology of the gonytrichum-type conidiophores, the position of phialides, and the presence/absence and morphology of chlamydospores. The gonytrichum-type conidiophores include two modified patterns. In the section Gonytrichum, the conidiophores have an arborescent appearance, a hallmark of this group. They form a complex system of the geniculate main stalk and lateral setae, anastomosing and intertwining, forming a densely woven network with phialides formed along the whole length of the stalk and setae. In the Gonytrichopsis, Mesobotrys, and Volubilia sections, the gonytrichum-type conidiophores are upward-facing, with phialides forming in the lower fertile part. They remotely resemble conidiophores of Chaetopsina, Phaeostalagmus, or Zanclospora (e.g. Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976, Rossman et al. 1999, Réblová et al. 2021c). Their sterile, setiform extensions anastomose, adhere, and intertwine, causing the conidiophores to be hardly separable.

Section Pseudophialocephala was resolved as a separate strongly supported lineage in the Chloridium clade. This is unexpected, because penicillate conidiophores are unusual in Chaetosphaeriaceae, and similar structures have never been associated with Chloridium. The Pseudophialocephala clade comprises seven ex-type strains of Chl. aquaticum, Chl. paucisetosum, Chl. salinicola, Chl. terricola, Leptographium costaricense, P. humicola, and Pseudophialocephala cuneata, several other non-type strains of P. humicola and P. xalapensis, and three unnamed isolates from the Netherlands. The number of ex-type strains is remarkable and reflects an attempt to describe any slight difference in morphology rather than search for characters shared by individual strains. These species are primarily soil isolates, rarely inhabit decaying wood in terrestrial and freshwater environments, and lack sexual morphs. Interestingly, their high morphological similitude in vitro corresponds with none or low divergence in the ITS region, recognised as the official DNA barcode of fungi (Schoch et al. 2012), which calls into question their validity as separate species. When Manawasinghe et al. (2020) proposed Pseudophialocephala based on Ps. cuneata, they transferred five of the above species into the genus. From the study of available strains, we conclude that shared morphological features in vitro and evidence in the ITS and LSU loci do not allow accurate identification and differentiation of taxa at the species level. The analysis of species delimitations methods indicated that members of the Pseudophialocephala section should be considered as a single species (Fig. 3). Similar results were suggested in ML/BI analyses; species were divided into five clusters without statistical support, except for a subclade comprising the strain CBS 148973 and two others. Due to taxonomic stability and new findings in morphology combined with divergence in DNA sequences of the coding loci in several species, we proposed to maintain the species status of the five subclades of section Pseudophialocephala inferred by ML/BI analyses until further research. We accept the following species: Chl. aquaticum, Chl. costaricense, Chl. cuneatum, Chl. humicola, and Chloridium sp. Chloridium salinicola was excluded from the genus.

We disagree with the results of Wu & Diao (2022) suggesting the placement of Adautomilanezia-Sporoschisma clade within the Chloridium genus, which makes Chloridium paraphyletic. Our results with the ITS-LSU dataset cured by Gblocks, containing newly described Chloridium species by Wu & Diao (2022), resulted in separate monophyletic clades of Chloridium and Adautomilanezia-Sporoschisma (Supplementary Figs S2, S3).

Species delimitation and morphological variability of Chloridium

The new treatment of species of Chloridium represents a transition to a unified species concept. It is based on a consilience of different approaches that improved the delimitation of taxa at a specific level and helped to determine generic and infrageneric boundaries.

We used a unified approach for species delimitation using modern methods based on the multispecies coalescent model as a starting point for the taxonomy of the studied group combined with morphological and physiological data. The phylogenetic species delimitation methods are becoming frequent in taxonomic studies, even concerning fungi (Maharachchikumbura et al. 2021, Glässnerová et al. 2022, Sklenář et al. 2022). Our analyses combined four molecular species delimitation methods based on different approaches (Bayesian inference: GMYC, STACEY; Maximum Likelihood: PTP; phylogenetic distance: ABGD) and all yielded largely congruent results. This suggests a strong phylogenetic signal with no method or locus providing widely incongruent results, despite the presence of a high number of singleton species. Of the three single-locus methods, GMYC provided the most consistent results across all loci, while PTP tended to oversplit the data set into more species (mainly in the clade containing Chl. chlamydosporum and related species, and in the section Pseudophialocephala). In comparison, ABGD generally delimited fewer species, most notably with the ITS data set, which divided the section Chloridium into five species only. Although the accepted approach (Carstens et al. 2013) to using these methods is to perform multiple of them and compare the results (as we did), we still consider the multilocus STACEY method to be somewhat superior to the single-locus methods because it usually provides conservative results that agree with the consensus of other methods (Hubka et al. 2018, Sklenář et al. 2021). Therefore, we used the STACEY results as the default starting point for taxonomic decisions and opted for the use of varieties in cases where we uncovered phenotypic differences within the clades delimited by STACEY and other methods as single species. Whether the varieties represent biologically distinct entities, as suggested by differences in temperature growth rates and biogeography (in some cases), may be revealed by further study using more strains and molecular data. The exceptions to this approach are species inside the section Pseudophialocephala, where a small number of data limited appropriate decisions.

The multigene phylogenetic tree showed the distribution of new species and varieties in all sections (Fig. 5). While we confirmed known species with gonytrichum-type conidiophores, an integrative taxonomy approach revealed hidden diversity among species with exclusively chloridium-type conidiophores. Therefore, most new species were recruited from the Chloridium section and one from Cryptogonytrichum and Metachloridium sections. However, only one new variety and species were described in the Gonytrichum and Volubilia sections. It is mainly because members of the Chloridium section exhibit extensive morphological homoplasy, especially in culture, and are difficult to identify based on morphology alone. To this end, we prepared primary (ITS) and secondary (tef1-α, tub2) sequence barcodes for each species to improve the identification of Chloridium spp. and provide the necessary resolution at specific and intraspecific levels. An exception is the 11 species described by Wu & Diao (2022), for which only the ITS fungal barcode is available.

In morphological studies, we focused on the observation of macro- and microscopic asexual diagnostic features: characteristics of the colony (shape and texture, colour of conidial masses, soluble pigments, and colony reverse), conidiophores (branching pattern, pigmentation, presence/absence of collar-like hyphae, basal cell), phialides (position on the conidiophore, their number in the whorl, pigmentation, shape, extension of the conidiogenous locus), conidia (colour, shape and the way they cluster) and position of chlamydospores on vegetative hyphae. Sexual characters serve primarily as supplementary. Sexual states, most of which have been historically referred to as Chaetosphaeria, are distributed in many lineages of Chaetosphaeriaceae (e.g. Liu et al. 2019, Luo et al. 2019, Réblová et al. 2021a,c,e, Wu & Diao 2022). It is not uncommon for representatives of different hyphomycetous genera with chaetosphaeria-like sexual morphs to have similar characteristics of ascomata, asci and ascospores. This is one of the things that is important for understanding the taxonomy of Chaetosphaeriaceae, that while the characters of the sexual morphs are uniform, the main diversity lies in the asexual characters. This also highlights the importance not only of studying asexual states in situ, but also of cultivating these fungi, which, for example, has traditionally been neglected in many discomycetes, and therefore asexual morphs have been little known (e.g. Tanney & Seifert 2020).

Relying primarily on morphological features, identifying species of sections Chloridium and Pseudophialocephala can be challenging. Determination of Chloridium spp. is easier on natural material, as the generally low morphological variability in vitro can cause frequent identification errors. It is, therefore, valuable to compare morphological diagnostic traits on the natural substrate, if available, with those in culture. Without characters from nature, it has been beneficial to grow mycelium on sterilised Urtica stems, pine needles, or banana leaves, which provide semi-natural conditions in vitro. Structures comparable to those from nature (e.g. elaborated gonytrichum-type conidiophores) can grow on them. On the contrary, members of other sections (Gonytrichopsis, Gonytrichum, Mesobotrys, and Volubilia) are morphologically well distinguishable, and combined morphological characters work reliably in vitro and in vivo.

Distinguishing members of section Pseudophialocephala requires further study. Unfortunately, their relationships have not been reliably resolved, possibly due to the lack of protein-coding sequence data for most of its members, or due to their real conspecificity. Although they are morphologically highly similar, we observed several unique morphological features. The presence of a “true foot cell” at the base of conidiophores was present only in members of Chl. humicola subclade, while in other species, the basal cell is only slightly inflated or bulbous. Interestingly, this character was omitted from the protologue of Chl. humicola (Jong & Davis 1972), but was described by Maggi & Persiani (1984) for P. xalapensis (= Chl. humicola). Chloridium sp. CBS 148973 produces the shortest phialocephala-type conidiophores of all species in this section, although the taller conidiophores appear in older cultures (>8 wk). It is also the only species to produce soluble pigments in vitro. The conidiogenous apparatus is hyaline in Chl. costaricense, although it may become pigmented in older cultures, it is regularly subhyaline to pale brown in other species. The conidiogenous locus of Chl. costaricense protrudes beyond the collarette and contains several minute annellations.

For all species of the genus Chloridium analysed in this study and listed in Table 1, we confirm that their conidiogenesis represents a unique mode of phialidic conidiogenesis on multiple loci. However, Wu & Diao (2022) introduced several species, e.g. Chl. crousii, Chl. cylindrosporellum and Chl. xishuangbannaense, with conidia formed on a single locus based on observations from nature. We believe the ontogenetic study of the conidiogenous locus should reveal its true nature.

The conidia of section Chloridium are primarily hyaline at maturity but may turn pale brown when ageing in some species. Especially members of the Chl. chlamydosporum species complex exhibit this trait. Lightly pigmented conidia at maturity were reported only in Chl. proliferatum (Wu & Diao 2022), but it is unclear whether they represent the aged form or not. Conidia are usually ellipsoidal to oblong or obovate, occasionally subglobose or suballantoid, and are of comparable size in culture, mostly 3.5–5.5 × 2.5–3.5 μm. The exception is Chl. virescens, which has slightly shorter and narrower conidia in the lower range, 2.5–4(–4.5) × 2–2.5(–3) μm. Thus, identifying species by conidial size in vitro is almost impossible. In addition, the shape and size of conidia may differ when compared in vitro and on material from nature. For example, in Chl. virescens conidia are subglobose on the natural substrate, but some isolates yielded ellipsoidal to oblong and somewhat longer conidia in culture. In other species with a known wild type, such as Chl. biforme and Chl. detriticola var. effusum, conidia formed in culture were shorter than those from nature. In comparison, Chl. caudigerum formed identical conidia in vitro and in vivo. It is desirable that, in the future, material for each species is available both in culture and on the natural substrate so that we can determine whether the occurrence of shorter conidia in culture is a common trend. Formation of conidial cirrhi is age-dependent and consistently through the head stage; sometimes cirrhi may form only in a part of the colony and could be overlooked. The conidium formation can also be studied in culture. Although cirrhi may appear in the early stages of colony development, in some species, they seem to depend more on age and form only in older cultures (> 4 wk). Conidial heads or cirrhi may have a characteristic colouration that is species specific. The colour can range from yellow to yellow-green to grass-green, deep yellow, or beige and may change with time. For example, Chl. virescens is characterised by yellow-green to grass-green cirrhi. However, the cirrhi may be white in different parts of the colony, and white conidial heads can be abundantly present. Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) noted that typical green cirrhi of Chl. virescens are very rare in the material from the UK and the Netherlands and very common in Belgium and the Czech Republic.

The soil isolate, described here as Chl. elongatum has cuneate, pale brown conidia and represents the section Metachloridium, a sister to the Chloridium lineage. Chloridium cylindrosporellum (Wu & Diao 2022) was also resolved as a member of Metachloridium; however, characters of hyaline cylindrical conidia borne on a single conidiogenous locus makes its inclusion questionable (see notes to the species). Cryptogonytrichum is another lineage with chloridium-type conidiophores. It includes Chl. novae-zelandiae with hyaline ellipsoidal conidia that lacks chlamydospores. The conidia of Gonytrichopsis, Gonytrichum, Mesobotrys, and Volubilia sections are hyaline and ellipsoidal to oblong, sometimes subglobose and somewhat smaller, 2.5–4.5(–5) × 1.5−2(–2.5) μm, than those of the Chloridium section with two exceptions. Chloridium ypsilosporum has the smallest, 1.5–2.5 × 1.5–2.5, T- or U-shaped to almost deltoid conidia and Chl. fuscum produces pale olivaceous brown conidia at maturity.

Morphological analysis revealed that most species of the section Pseudophialocephala have obovate to somewhat ellipsoidal conidia, rarely cuneate in Chl. cuneatum, and undergo protracted maturation associated with the colour change from (sub)hyaline to pale brown. However, the conidia turn brown only after separation from the conidiogenous locus and adhere in conspicuous brown glossy heads, which later turn into a formless slime covering the surface of the substrate. This conidial ontogeny is best observed in culture. Although Chl. humicola was introduced with hyaline ellipsoidal conidia, some conidia were illustrated with thicker walls and pigmentation (Jong & Davis 1972). Our study of the ex-type strain CBS 420.73 of Chl. humicola demonstrated that conidia become pale brown at maturity and are obovate to ellipsoidal. Chloridium aquaticum and Chl. cuneatum were described from submerged wood, both species with hyaline conidia; the later pigmented stage has not been observed (Wei et al. 2020, Manawasinghe et al. 2022).

The morphology of chlamydospores and their position on vegetative hyphae is best observed in slide culture. However, their abundance can vary even among strains of a single species. Chlamydospores are unicellular, dark, thick-walled structures, usually solitary or in pairs (Chloridium, Volubilia), rarely in long chains (Metachloridium) or multicellular clusters (Gonytrichopsis). In members of the Chloridium section, lateral, terminal, and intercalary chlamydospores often occur together in one species. Although this trait is highly variable, it can be exploited at a species level because a particular position may dominate in some species. For example, members of the Chl. chlamydosporum species complex (Chl. chlamydosporum, Chl. detriticola, Chl. peruense) form predominantly lateral, sessile, mainly globose to subglobose chlamydospores. In Chl. virescens, chlamydospores are mostly intercalary or in short chains of 2–3 cells. In Chl. chloroconium, chlamydospores adhere in series and irregular multicellular clusters. On MLA, these clusters project above the surface of the colony and form stromatic bodies visible under the stereomicroscope. On the other hand, chlamydospores were absent in representatives of Cryptogonytrichum, Gonytrichum, Mesobotrys, and Pseudophialocephala.

Soluble colour pigments are rare in Chloridium, and their production varies among the representatives of each section. Interestingly, they were mainly produced on the MLA medium. Pigments are absent in members of the sections Cryptogonytrichum, Mesobotrys, and Volubilia. They rarely occur in Chl. chloridioides and Chl. subglobosum of the Gonytrichum section and have pale peach or ochre colour on MLA. In the section Chloridium, the deep gold-ochre pigment was observed in both strains of Chl. moratum (MLA). Pale yellow (CMD, MLA) and pale gold (OA, PCA) pigments occurred in several strains of Chl. virescens and Chl. bellum var. luteum (MLA). Two isolates of Chl. chlamydosporum produced pale yellow to pale ochre pigment on MLA. Chloridium elongatum produced deep gold-ochre pigment (MLA). A peculiar colouration was observed in Chl. chloroconium; pale yellow pigment (MLA, PCA) and yellow-green to green to petroleum pigment (OA) diffused into the agar at the margin and beneath the colony.

The pigmentation of vegetative hyphae varies from species to species and also depends on the age of the colony. The hyphae may be hyaline in one strain, but later parts of the mycelium become subhyaline to pale brown, especially hyphae from which conidiophores arise. The projection of the tip of the phialides above the collarette occurs in many species of Chloridium and can reach several micrometres. Occasionally, the conidiogenous locus percurrently elongates to form minute annellations after each conidium, e.g. Chl. caudigerum (Chloridium), Chl. costaricense (Pseudophialocephala).

A character that proved helpful in recognizing species with the gonytrichum-type conidiophore at the specific level was the interval between the collar-like hyphae bearing whorls of phialides. These intervals are sometimes not identical to the internodes, e.g. in Chl. mirabile and Chl. volubile. In these species, the collar-like hyphae or solitary phialides grow irregularly or from every other node. Other diagnostic characters were the number of phialides in whorls, their pigmentation and shape, and the number of setae.

Only nine species of Chloridium are holomorphic. Although the sexual morphs are almost indistinguishable, ascospores disarticulate into slightly longer and broader part spores (4–5.5 × 2.5–3.5 μm) in species with the chloridium-type conidiophores than in species with the gonytrichum-type conidiophores (3.5–5 × 2–2.5 μm).

Challenges in identifying species of Chloridium

The taxonomy of Chloridium, until recently based solely on morphology, can be complicated. Furthermore, the traditionally used barcode genes showed poor resolution power in some species such as Chl. bellum and Chl. guttiferum. As a result, we did not observe a clear barcoding gap which was found in other related fungi (Réblová et al. 2021a, b). This suggests that although the barcodes studied worked for most species, a combination of barcodes must be used for others.

We focused on elucidating relationships in the species complex of Chl. virescens. This study revealed how subtle and phenoplastic the characters are. Following Mangenot (1952), Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) stated that it is difficult to distinguish between the three varieties of Chl. virescens because some characters, such as conidia, chlamydospores, and vegetative mycelium, do not allow a clear distinction between these taxa. Most strains (21 isolates) identified as Chloridium virescens var. caudigerum and var. chlamydosporum by Gams & Holubová-Jechová (1976) were analysed in this study; surprisingly, they represent seven species and two varieties (Table 5). As a result, varieties caudigerum and chlamydosporum were reinstated to their original species status. Chloridium caudigerum and Chl. virescens are among the most abundant species in our data set.

Chloridium chlamydosporum proved to be an understudied species complex divided into three species and two varieties, that are distinguished by the size and shape of conidia and a variable number of nucleotides in the H1 helix of the ITS1 corresponding to changes in the canonical pairs (Fig. 8). The clade of Chl. chlamydosporum contains eight strains grouped into three lineages A, B and C. The A and B are sister lineages and comprise four strains, including the ex-type strain CBS 114.41; all are exclusively soil isolates from the Netherlands. Curiously, strains of these two lineages coexisted in one soil sample, assuming they have similar ecological requirements. Members of the lineage C originate from decaying wood or soil from countries such as Chile, Czech Republic, France and New Zealand.

The following three cases document the dangers of attempts to catalogue living organisms based on insufficient knowledge or a single collection that is damaged or immature or in the absence of culture studies that would allow the ontogeny of specific traits to be monitored. Chloridium aseptatum (= Chl. fuscum) was described from submerged wood with unbranched conidiophores, terminal phialides, and hyaline, obovate conidia (Wei et al. 2018). The illustration accompanying the protologue is of poor quality. It shows several broken conidiophores on wood, including one young conidiophore with a collar-like hypha and a discrete phialide. In culture, the fungus formed chloridium-type conidiophores with hyaline conidia. However, conidiophores would soon develop collar-like hyphae in the nodes, and conidia would turn pale olivaceous brown. The colony characteristics are based on a 5-d-old culture, which is inadequate because the culture cannot develop the typical olivaceous or dark green conidial masses in such a short time. The 3- or 4-wk-old cultures of Chloridium should be a standard to record observations. Chloridium fuscum is a common species, often isolated from soil, and one of the most recognizable species of Chloridium.

Chloridium submersum (= Chl. chloroconium) is a superfluous name proposed by Hyde et al. (2020) for a part of the life cycle of an already validly described species, previously known as Gonytrichum chlamydosporium (Barron & Bhatt 1967). The protologue contains only a description of chloridium-type conidiophores. Although the ex-type strain was obtained in the axenic culture, there were no accompanying culture studies. It is typical for Chl. chloroconium that chloridium-type conidiophores are a part of the colony on the natural substrate. They may also represent the early stages of colony development, especially if the material is placed in a moist chamber and growth is terminated prematurely.

Chloridium salinicola is a marine lignicolous species. It is characterised by ellipsoidal to cylindrical, hyaline, 1-septate conidia, monophialidic conidiogenous cells, and unbranched conidiophores (Dayarathne et al. 2020). However, such morphology matches the characteristics of Cylindrotrichum (Réblová et al. 2011) and indicates that the species should be excluded from Chloridium. In the phylogenetic analysis based on ITS and LSU sequences, the holotype MFLU 19-1238 and ex-type strain MFLUCC 15-0382 of Chl. salinicola were grouped as a sister clade to Chl. aquaticum (Dayarathne et al. 2020), an implausible relationship indicating a mislabelled or contaminated culture or mixed-up sequences. Manawasinghe et al. (2022) introduced the genus Pseudophialocephala and proposed a new combination for Chl. salinicola. These authors probably did not check the species diagnosis, which would otherwise lead to a different generic concept.

Although we concur with Seifert (2017) that the description of new species based on a single culture or collection is debatable and should be avoided, we introduced several new species or varieties based on one specimen. For each of them, we performed in-depth morphological studies on material from nature (if available) and five agar media to cover various nutrient requirements and prolonged incubation (1–6 mo). This allowed us to observe any irregularities and ontogeny of critical traits, such as the conidiophore branching pattern, chlamydospores, conidia formation, and change of colour in time. In most cases, the new species represent separate lineages that do not fit into the intraspecific morphological variation of neighbouring lineages, and they can also be well distinguished by DNA sequences of the ITS, tef1-α, and tub2 barcodes and are supported by biogeography data.

Global biogeography and ecology of Chloridium

Chloridium is traditionally considered a fungus growing on wood in the later stages of decay or on other plant debris (Gams & Holubová-Jechová 1976). Later culture studies have shown that some species are also common in soil (Domsch et al. 2007). Our study, based on datamining, showed that more than 87 % of all samples originated from various soil types (bulk, top, and rhizosphere soil). Considering that 55.4 % of all samples in GlobalFungi come from these types of soil, we can consider Chloridium a soilborne fungus. We hypothesise that it is possible that thick-walled and melanised fungal structures (e.g. chlamydospores, conidiophores, and setae) may be passively deposited from litter/wood into the surrounding soil and therefore predominate in the upper soil layers. However, the number of reads/records suggests that it also grows saprobically in soil. Chloridium was commonly found in litter, but also more frequently in the upper soil layer (humus) horizon, in spruce and beech forests in Europe, but it was very rare in the deeper soil mineral horizon at that time (Asplund et al. 2019). Other studies list Chloridium (including Phialocephala humicola) among the abundant taxa in nutrient-rich soils (e.g. Curlevski et al. 2014, Zhou et al. 2016, Benucci et al. 2019, Liu et al. 2020, Trentini et al. 2020, Yang et al. 2021, Balami et al. 2021, Jörgensen et al. 2021). Interestingly, Chloridium has been identified as a potential factor regulating soil nitrification in acidic soil (Zhang et al. 2020, Novinscak et al. 2016). We conclude that Chloridium has affinity to nutrient rich substrates such as litter and upper soil horizons, and considering its abundance, its role in nitrogen cycling should be studied in detail.

In addition, Chloridium shows preference to various soil types (bulk vs topsoil). This corresponds to the fact that fungal communities in the soil are vertically stratified and carbon-rich topsoil differs fundamentally from the carbon-poor bulk soil in its community composition (Odriozola et al. 2021, Mundra et al. 2021). We showed that there are differences between Chloridium species in their ecological requirements for soil conditions. Considering the proportion of sampling in GlobalFungi, Chloridium is also common in roots, deadwood and litter but certainly does not live as endophyte in healthy plant tissues (0.1 % samples in our study vs 13 % samples in GlobalFungi). In terms of habitat, it is clearly a forest fungus, as 94 % of its samples come from forests, whereas only 58 % of the samples in GlobalFungi are forest fungi.

Furthermore, Chloridium can be considered an important component of the global mycobiota, as about 0.3 % of all sequence reads in GlobalFungi can be assigned to this genus. The unexpectedly high abundance of these fungi can be demonstrated on Chloridium detriticola var. detriticola. Based on the GlobalFungi with the Exact hit search, this fungus was found in 7 903 samples with an abundance of 3.3 × 106 reads. This species corresponds in the UNITE database to Species hypothesis SH1517985.08FU named Chaetosphaeriaceae sp. Since Species hypothesis is a group of sequences with 98.5 % similarity, it is also more abundant according to GlobalFungi (8 096 samples, 4.3 × 106 sequence reads). This is a higher abundance than, for example, common soil fungi such as Aspergillus fumigatus, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Penicillium brevicompactum, P. commune or Trichoderma viride, and is comparable to the number of species that are most abundant in the GlobalFungi database (e.g. Humicola olivacea, Mortierella alpina) (Table 7). The question is why common fungi have remained neglected for so long. One might expect this to be due to slow growth and poor sporulation, but the opposite is true. Their growth rate is rather moderate and they sporulate easily in culture, especially when freshly isolated, and form conidiophore structures, which are essential for identification. However, unless they form conidia in coloured clusters, these microfungi are easily missed on a natural substrate and are not visible to the untrained eye. Our findings also show the importance of taxonomic revisions and species naming. Based on the sequences deposited in the NCBI GenBank (e.g. JF519556, JF519323, MK131604, HQ207069, HQ022162, FJ554106, DQ233873, HQ611333, KP889881, JN889834, KF617811), the species Chl. detriticola has been identified in several studies but got different classifications (e.g. Chaetosphaeriaceae sp.). Thus, not assigning a taxon to a single name hindered communication between studies. This will now become feasible and lead to the recognition of Chloridium as an important representative of the global soil component.

Table 7.

Summary of abundance, biogeography and substrate affinity of the most common species of the genus Chloridium and several soil fungi that are generally considered hyperabundant. Soil fungal taxa are ‘Species hypotheses’ (SHs) defined by the UNITE database and represent clusters with 98.5 % sequence similarity. Species hypothesis SH1517985.08FU classified by UNITE as Chaetosphaeriaceae sp. contains the ITS sequence of Chloridium detriticola var. detriticola. For taxa without a Species hypothesis (i.e. data from this study), the analysis was performed using the full similarity rule (Exact hit option in Sequence Search in GlobalFungi). For taxa with Species hypothesis the taxon search using the particular SH was performed in GlobalFungi database. The primary data are in Table S2.

Species hypothesis Species1 Classification Abundance Geographical origin (% of samples) Substrate (% of samples)

Samples Studies Total reads North America South America Europe Africa Asia Australia Antarctica bulk soil rhizosphere soil litter deadwood lichen shoot root air root & rhizosphere soil sediment topsoil water dust
Chloridium bellum var. bellum Chaetosphaeriales 2.54997235.31616.30.47.81.372.71.40.139.34.50.00.20.00.11.10.00.40.154.40.00.0
Chloridium caudigerum Chaetosphaeriales 2.16410727.7067.70.073.50.018.70.10.072.61.010.06.70.00.24.30.10.10.05.00.10.0
Chloridium chlamydosporum Chaetosphaeriales 1.6667252.03822.30.714.20.261.80.80.047.03.12.08.50.10.21.10.00.00.038.00.00.0
Chloridium chloroconium Chaetosphaeriales 1.8488291.6805.70.945.70.246.80.70.050.24.27.22.30.00.11.80.00.40.133.60.00.0
Chloridium cylindrosporellum Chaetosphaeriales 2.52947162.7060.91.86.30.089.21.70.019.10.80.90.00.00.00.20.00.00.079.00.00.0
Chloridium detriticola var. detriticola Chaetosphaeriales 7.9031323.344.5603.70.733.70.058.93.00.037.90.43.42.90.00.22.40.00.00.052.90.00.0
Chloridium fuscum Chaetosphaeriales 7.2461861.891.02513.81.64.01.472.46.20.240.23.70.30.30.00.12.40.10.30.452.20.00.0
Chloridium humicola Chaetosphaeriales 3.287174162.06911.32.422.10.957.55.30.161.14.92.92.00.00.33.00.10.30.924.40.20.0
Chloridium moratum Chaetosphaeriales 4.405571.568.9212.10.58.00.089.30.10.013.30.31.20.30.00.00.90.00.00.084.00.00.0
Chloridium shangsiense Chaetosphaeriales 3.31471348.0002.50.79.00.187.00.60.016.40.11.13.30.00.10.40.00.00.178.50.10.0
Chloridium sinense Chaetosphaeriales 1.05016146.2210.00.00.00.099.30.70.06.76.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.087.20.00.0
Chloridium volubile Chaetosphaeriales 3.55981355.2572.70.610.50.185.00.90.020.60.11.03.10.00.12.00.00.00.272.80.00.0
SH1530040.08FU Aspergillus fumigatus Eurotiales 1.938751.986.08123.61.12.01.067.00.31.021.24.90.04.90.025.42.60.40.21.322.321.50.0
SH1517985.08FUChaetosphaeriaceae sp.* Chaetosphaeriales 8.6541584.318.1043.90.833.30.059.12.70.037.00.53.64.40.00.42.60.00.00.051.60.00.0
SH1567485.08FU Cladosporium cladosporioides Capnodiales 8.096278935.68611.82.53.31.374.95.00.339.26.61.00.60.05.64.72.50.11.835.25.20.1
SH1615600.08FU Humicola olivacea Sordariales 8.5391956.675.1297.50.99.22.377.52.30.036.23.30.71.40.00.83.00.00.50.353.70.00.0
SH1650283.08FU Mortierella alpina Mortierellales 10.6691198.402.76914.50.814.11.362.46.30.245.18.30.20.00.01.14.90.20.00.839.20.10.0
SH1529991.08FU Penicillium bialowiezense Eurotiales 9.2292481.498.6777.10.734.40.255.41.70.134.04.74.01.40.05.63.82.00.50.443.20.50.0
SH1536636.08FU Penicillium brevicompactum Eurotiales 5.138141837.0805.60.312.91.176.83.30.125.52.22.40.20.00.41.70.00.10.166.70.00.0
SH2189919.08FU Penicillium commune Eurotiales 1.226161166.41619.71.820.23.041.48.22.040.67.40.60.60.010.46.06.90.25.120.71.40.0
SH1738438.08FU Trichoderma viride Hypocreales 7.3491331.933.0805.70.936.30.054.82.20.038.91.02.53.60.30.72.40.10.00.250.40.10.0

Global fungi (all data in the database)57.1845152 938 997 39021.592.6931.470.7334.155.012.1041.542.742.403.300.5113.218.671.570.672.0611.231.880.06

1 Asterisk (*) indicates that the phylogenetic hypothesis labeled “Chaetosphaeriaceae sp.” is Chloridium detriticola var. detriticola.

For species of microscopic conidial fungi, we have only anecdotal knowledge of their biogeography (Klich 2002). This is mainly due to the unreliability of identifications from the pre-molecular era. Therefore, only now, when we are more confident of the actual species boundaries, we can start to think about the biogeographical patterns of common soil fungi (e.g. Réblová et al. 2021c, Torres-Garcia et al. 2022). In this respect, our study is pioneering because it is the first to be conducted on a large set of relatively common fungi using published metabarcoding data. For greater precision, we chose a complete sequence similarity rule, which may limit the observed distribution in the case of more genetically variable species. On the other hand, it reduces the risk of merging two biologically distinct species into a single taxon.

The validity of our results is evidenced by the fact that in all cases, we have verified distributions known from reliable records. In addition, for many species, we have significantly extended the knowledge. The most notable case is Chl. detriticola var. detriticola, which is known from only three collections. However, according to metabarcoding data, it is the most common species in the genus, with a cosmopolitan distribution.

The distribution of species of the genus Chloridium is primarily determined by climatic conditions. Thus, we see species with a wide valence (all climates), or restricted to non-boreal zones, or conversely to non-tropical zones. As a consequence, we see that fungi that do not tolerate colder climates are not distributed north of the border that is in southern England, southern Sweden, and the US-Canada border, although these northern territories are very well covered in GlobalFungi (Supplementary Tables S2, S3). Surprisingly, not many species cross this boundary. The ability to live in cold regions is a derived trait, as indicated in the analysis of ancestral areas (Fig. 10). The effect of climate and separation of the species to cold-tolerant and non-tolerant is the same pattern we observed in our previous study on the genus Codinaea and related genera (Réblová et al. 2021b). Climate is an important driver of different aspects of fungal biogeography, including the global distribution of common fungi and the composition and diversity of fungal communities (Větrovský et al. 2019, Tedersoo et al. 2014). Our study of cardinal growth values suggests that temperature optima are related to distribution patterns. Chloridium detriticola grows well at 5–15 °C, with an optimum at 20 °C and an inability to grow above 25 °C. This species is the most common Chloridium in the boreal region. Species that have an optimum at 30 °C (Chl. bellum, Chl. fuscum, Chl. guttiferum, Chl. peruense) are relatively common in the tropics and subtropics and do not extend into the boreal region. In addition to climate, species distribution is limited by other factors. Some species maintain relatively small ranges (e.g. Ch. biforme, Chl. novae-zelandiae) or do not inhabit certain continents, although they are common on others (e.g. Chl. caesium, Chl. virescens). Reconstruction of the ancestral areas showed that the ancestral climatic zone is subtropical or temperate, with an absence of cold areas. These areas are also where the greatest diversity is found and, conversely, few species are found in the boreal conifer forests. Thus, temperate or subtropical forests are a good target when looking for other Chloridium species.

In conclusion, our study confirmed the important role of climate on fungal biogeography by studying it at the level of individual species, for which we focused on the correct delineation of species boundaries. We now have the opportunity to study large sets of metabarcoding data using the GlobalFungi database, and it is therefore possible to extend the study of geography to other fungi that are relatively difficult to isolate and phenotype and for which a similar study of geography was previously impossible.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sim-2022-103-4-g034.jpg

Chloridium virescens. A–D. Conidia. E–J. Conidiophores. K–N. Chlamydospores. A, B, D. On MLA. C, I, J, K, M, N. On MLA. E–H, L. On CMD. Images: A. CBS 145487; B, E–J, L–N. CBS 102341; C. CBS 144660; D. CBS 145481; K. CBS 144663. Scale bars: A–D, K–N = 10 μm; E–J = 20 μm.

Acknowledgments

M.R. would like to dedicate this study to Keith A. Seifert and the late Walter Gams, her mentors, friends, and colleagues who were at the origin of this study 20 years ago. Walter Gams co-authored several papers on Chloridium and taught M.R. how to notice details in conidiogenesis. For many years, Keith A. Seifert patiently revealed the world of hyphomycetes to M.R, and his laboratory performed the first sequencing of Chloridium species and related taxa in 2002 and 2003 during M.R.’s internship.

This study was supported by the project of the Czech Science Foundation (GAÈR 20-14840S), and as long-term research development projects of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany (RVO 67985939) (K.R., M.R., F.S.), project National Institute for Cancer Research (Programme EXCELES, ID Project No. LX22NPO5102) funded by the European Union - Next Generation EU (K.R.), and the University Hospital Hradec Králové MH CZ – DRO (UHHK, 00179906) (J.N.). The field work of M.R. in New Zealand was partly supported by Manaaki Whenua Fellowship, Landcare Research Auckland (2005). Peter Johnston is thanked for his assistance to M.R. in obtaining the Manaaki Whenua Fellowship and collecting permits for New Zealand. We thank Pedro W. Crous for allowing us to study several strains of Chloridium from the CBS collection during the preparation of this study. We thank Gerald Bills and Keith A. Seifert for various strains of Chloridium. Konstanze Bensch is acknowledged for the grammatical review of new names. Curators and collection managers Shannon Asencio and Jennifer Wilkinson (DAOM), Angela Bond and Shaheenara Chowdhury Lida (Kew), Cony Decock (MUCL), Jan Holec (PRM), Anthony Kermode and Helen Stewart (CABI-IMI), Dana Lanèová (PRA), Trix Merkx (CBS), Andrew M. Miller (ILLS), Donald Pfister and Genevieve Tocci (FH), Megan Peterson (ICMP) and Adrienne Stanton (PDD), are acknowledged for assistance with obtaining living cultures and herbarium loans and depositing new herbarium specimens and strains. We acknowledge the French Ministry of Environment for assistance in getting the collecting permit for France. We thank Jacques Fournier for accompanying and guiding M.R. on the field trips in France and for pointing out interesting sites. M.H.R. thanks all the children and parents who participated in the Citizen Science project by the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, collected soil samples in their gardens, and provided them to the Westerdijk Institute for further research. M.K. thanks to Milada Fejková and Tomáš Větrovský for technical assistance with growth measurements and GlobalFungi data analyses.

DECLARATION ON CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material: https://studiesinmycology.org/

Fig. S1.

Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree of the genus Chloridium based on analysis of a concatenated data set (ITS, LSU) treated with Gblocks. Species names given in bold and marked in blue colour are Chloridium species described by Wu & Diao (2022). Branch support of nodes ≥ 75 % ML is indicated above or below branches.

Fig. S2.

Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree of the family Chaetosphaeriaceae based on analysis of a concatenated data set (ITS, LSU) treated with Gblocks. Species names given in bold and marked in blue colour are Chloridium species described by Wu & Diao (2022). Branch support of nodes ≥ 75 % ML is indicated above or below branches.

Fig. S3.

Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree of genera Adautomilanezia, Chloridium and Sporoschisma based on analysis of a concatenated data set (ITS, LSU) treated with Gblocks. Species names given in bold and marked in blue colour are Chloridium species described by Wu & Diao (2022). Branch support of nodes ≥ 75 % ML is indicated above or below branches.

Fig. S4.

Geographical distribution of Chloridium spp. based on data from the GlobalFungi database.

Table S1.

Estimates of evolutionary divergence between ITS rDNA sequences. The number of base differences per site from between sequences are shown. Analyses were conducted using the Kimura 2-parameter model [1]. This analysis involved 116 nucleotide sequences. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). There were a total of 562 positions in the final data set. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA11 [2].

Table S2.

Biogeography, substrate and habitat affinity of Chloridium inferred from the GlobalFungi database. The overview of all samples in the database (Sheet 1), summary across all Chloridium species (Table S3), and detailed metadata and primary data for all Chloridium species are presented.

Table S3.

Summary of biogeography, substrate and habitat affinity of Chloridium inferred from the GlobalFungi database.

Table S4.

Growth on different temperatures (5–37 °C) after 14 d. The average of three measurements is presented. The values of average Mean Annual Temperature (MAT), average Mean Annual Precipitation (MAP) for each species are presented. MAT and MAP were obtained from GlobalFungi database and the primary data are presented in Table S2.

REFERENCES

  • Asplund J, Kauserud H, Ohlson M, et al. (2019). Spruce and beech as local determinants of forest fungal community structure in litter, humus and mineral soil. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 95: fiy232. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Balami S, Vašutová M, Košnar J, et al. (2021). Soil fungal communities in abandoned agricultural land has not yet moved towards the seminatural forest. Forest Ecology and Management 491: 119181. [Google Scholar]
  • Barron GL. (1968). The Genera of Hyphomycetes from Soil. Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Barron GL, Bhatt GC. (1967). A new species of Gonytrichum from soil. Mycopathologia et Mycologia Applicata 32: 126–128. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Bengtsson-Palme J, Ryberg M, Hartmann M, et al. (2013) Improved software detection and extraction of ITS1 and ITS2 from ribosomal ITS sequences of fungi and other eukaryotes for analysis of environmental sequencing data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4: 914–919. [Google Scholar]
  • Benucci GMN, Bonito V, Bonito G. (2019). Fungal, bacterial, and archaeal diversity in soils beneath native and introduced plants in Fiji, South Pacific. Microbial Ecology 78: 136–146. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Booth C. (1957). Studies of Pyrenomycetes: I. Four species of Chaetosphaeria, two with Catenularia conidia. II. Melanopsamma pomiformis and its Stachybotrys conidia. Mycological Papers 68: 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  • Bouckaert R, Vaughan TG, Barido-Sottani J, et al. (2019). BEAST 2.5: An advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Computational Biology 15: e1006650. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Carstens BC, Pelletier TA, Reid NM, et al. (2013). How to fail at species delimitation. Molecular Ecology 22: 4369–4383. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Castresana J. (2000). Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17: 540–552. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Coleman AW. (2009). Is there a molecular key to the level of “biological species” in eukaryotes? A DNA guide. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 50: 197–203. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Coleman AW, Vacquier VD. (2002). Exploring the phylogenetic utility of ITS sequences for animals: a test case for abalone (Haliotis). Journal of Molecular Evolution 54: 246–257. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Constantinescu O, Holm K, Holm L. (1995). Teleomorph-anamorph connections in Ascomycetes: the anamorphs of three species of Chaetosphaeria. Mycological Research 99: 585–592. [Google Scholar]
  • Corda ACJ. (1837). Icones fungorum hucusque cognitorum I. J.G. Calve, Prague, Czech Republic. [Google Scholar]
  • Crous PW, Shivas RG, Quaedvlieg W, et al. (2014). Fungal Planet description sheets: 214–280. Persoonia 32: 184–306. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Crous PW, Schumacher RK, Wingfield MJ, et al. (2015). Fungal systematics and evolution: FUSE 1. Sydowia 67: 81–118. [Google Scholar]
  • Crous PW, Verkley GJM, Christensen M, et al. (2012). How important are conidial appendages? Persoonia 28: 126–137. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Crous PW, Verkley GJM, Groenewald JZ, et al. (2019). Fungal Biodiversity. Westerdijk Laboratory Manual Series 1. Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  • Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Guarro J, et al. (2013). Fungal Planet description sheets: 154–213. Persoonia 31: 188–296. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Schumacher RK, et al. (2020). New and Interesting Fungi. 3. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 6: 157–231. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Cruz ACR da, Gusmão LFP. (2009). Fungos conidiais na Caatinga: espécies lignícolas. Acta Botanica Brasilica 23: 1133–1144. [Google Scholar]
  • Curlevski NJA, Drigo B, Cairney JW, et al. (2014). Influence of elevated atmospheric CO2 and water availability on soil fungal communities under Eucalyptus saligna. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 70: 263–271. [Google Scholar]
  • Currah RS, Tsuneda A, Murakami S. (1993). Morphology and ecology of Phialocephala fortinii in roots of Rhododendron brachycarpum. Canadian Journal of Botany 71: 1639–1644. [Google Scholar]
  • Darty K, Denise A, Ponty Y. (2009). VARNA: Interactive drawing and editing of the RNA secondary structure. Bioinformatics 25: 1974–1975 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Dayarathne MC, Jones EBG, Maharachchikumbura SSN, et al. (2020). Morpho-molecular characterization of microfungi associated with marine based habitats. Mycosphere 11: 1–188. [Google Scholar]
  • Domsch KH, Gams W, Anderson TH. (2007). Compendium of Soil Fungi. IHW-Verlag Eching, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • Drummond AJ, Xie W, Heled J. (2012). Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data using *BEAST. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 1969–1973. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Ellis MB. (1971). Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew, Surrey, England. [Google Scholar]
  • Ellis JB, Everhart BM. (1883). New species of fungi. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 10(9): 97–98. [Google Scholar]
  • Fehrer J, Réblová M, Bambasová V, et al. (2019). The root-symbiotic Rhizoscyphus ericae aggregate and Hyaloscypha (Leotiomycetes) are congeneric: Phylogenetic and experimental evidence. Studies in Mycology 92: 195–225. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Fernández FA, Huhndorf SM. (2005). New species of Chaetosphaeria, Melanopsammella and Tainosphaeria gen. nov. from the Americas. Fungal Diversity 18: 15–57. [Google Scholar]
  • Fernández FA, Miller AN, Huhndorf SM, et al. (2006) Systematics of the genus Chaetosphaeria and its allied genera: morphological and phylogenetic diversity in north temperate and neotropical taxa. Mycologia 98: 121–130. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Fries EM. (1823). Systema Mycologicum 2(2): 276–620. [Google Scholar]
  • Fujisawa T, Barraclough TG. (2013). Delimiting species using single-locus data and the Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent (GMYC) approach: a revised method and evaluation on simulated datasets. Systematic Biology 62: 707–724. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Gams W, Holubová-Jechová V. (1976). Chloridium and some other dematiaceous hyphomycetes growing on decaying wood. Studies in Mycology 13: 1–99. [Google Scholar]
  • Gams W, Holubová-Jechová V. (1981). Chloridium and some other dematiaceous hyphomycetes growing on decaying wood. Corrections and additions. Mycotaxon 13: 257–258. [Google Scholar]
  • Gilman JC, Abbott EV. (1927). A summary of the soil fungi. Iowa State College Journal of Science 1: 225–343. [Google Scholar]
  • Glass NL, Donaldson GC. (1995). Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61: 1323–1330. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Glässnerová K, Sklenář F, Jurjeviæ Ž, et al. (2022) A monograph of Aspergillus section Candidi. Studies in Mycology 102: 1–51. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Goidànich G. (1933). Inforno ad alcuni micromiceti nuovi o rari. Annales Mycologici 31: 134–143. [Google Scholar]
  • Goos RD. (1969). Conidium ontogeny in Cacumisporium capitulatum. Mycologia 61: 52–56. [Google Scholar]
  • Groenewald M, Lombard L, de Vries M, et al. (2018). Diversity of yeast species from Dutch garden soil and the description of six novel Ascomycetes. FEMS Yeast Research 18: foy076. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Grove WB. (1886). New or noteworthy fungi: Part III. Journal of Botany, British and Foreign. 24: 129–137. [Google Scholar]
  • Gutell RR, Gray MW, Schnare MN. (1993). A compilation of large subunit (23S and 23 S-like) ribosomal RNA structures. Nucleic Acids Research 21: 3055–3074. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Grünig CR, Sieber TN, Rogers SO, et al. (2002). Genetic variability among strains of Phialocephala fortinii and phylogenetic analysis of the genus Phialocephala based on rDNA ITS sequence comparisons. Canadian Journal of Botany 80: 1239–1249. [Google Scholar]
  • Hall TA. (1999). BioEdit 5.0.9: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  • Hammill T. M (1972). Electron microscopy of conidiogenesis of Chloridium chlamydosporis. Mycologia 64: 1054–1065. [Google Scholar]
  • Harrington TC. (1988). Leptographium species, their distributions, hosts and insect vectors. In: Leptographium root diseases on conifers (Harrington TC, Cobb FW, jr, eds). American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, Minnesota: 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  • Hashimoto A, Sato G, Matsuda T, et al. (2015). Taxonomic revision of Pseudolachnea and Pseudolachnella, and establishment of Neopseudolachnella and Pseudodinemasporium genera nova. Mycologia 107: 383–408. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Hernández-Restrepo M, Gené J, Castañeda-Ruiz RF, et al. (2017). Phylogeny of saprobic microfungi from Southern Europe. Studies in Mycology 86: 53–97. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Holubová-Jechová V. (1982). New or interesting phialidic hyphomycetes from Cuba. Mycotaxon 15: 277–292. [Google Scholar]
  • Hoog de GS, Gerrits van den Ende AH. (1998). Molecular diagnostics of clinical strains of filamentous Basidiomycetes. Mycoses 41: 183–189. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Hubka V, Barrs V, Dudová Z, et al. (2018). Unravelling species boundaries in the Aspergillus viridinutans complex (section Fumigati): opportunistic human and animal pathogens capable of interspecific hybridization. Persoonia 41: 142–174. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Hughes SJ. (1951). Stachylidium, Gonytrichum, Mesobotrys, Chaetopsis and Chaetopsella. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 34: 551–576. [Google Scholar]
  • Hughes SJ. (1953). Conidiophores, conidia and classification. Canadian Journal of Botany 31: 577–659. [Google Scholar]
  • Hughes SJ. (1958). Revisiones Hyphomycetum aliquot cum appendice de nominibus rejiciendis. Canadian Journal of Botany 36: 727–836. [Google Scholar]
  • Hughes SJ, Kendrick WB. (1968). New Zealand Fungi 12. Menispora, Codinaea, Menisporopsis. New Zealand Journal of Botany 6: 323–375. [Google Scholar]
  • Huhndorf SM, Fernández FA. (2005). Teleomorph-anamorph connections: Chaetosphaeria raciborskii and related species, and their Craspedodidymum-like anamorphs. Fungal Diversity 19: 23–49. [Google Scholar]
  • Hyde KD, Norphanphoun C, Maharachchikumbura SSN, et al. (2020). Refined families of Sordariomycetes. Mycosphere 11: 305–1059. [Google Scholar]
  • Iwamoto S, Tokumasu S. (2001). Dematiaceous hyphomycetes inhabiting decaying blackish needles of Abies firma and their distribution in the Kanto district, Japan. Mycoscience 42: 273–279. [Google Scholar]
  • Jacobs A, Coetzee MPA, Wingfield BD, et al. (2003). Phylogenetic relationships among Phialocephala species and other Ascomycetes. Mycologia 95: 637–645. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Jacobs K, Wingfield MJ. (2001). Leptographium species: tree pathogens, insect associates and agents of blue-stain. American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, Minnesota: 1–224. [Google Scholar]
  • Jones G. (2017). Algorithmic improvements to species delimitation and phylogeny estimation under the multispecies coalescent. Journal of Mathematical Biology 74: 447–467. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Jones G, Aydin Z, Oxelman B. (2015). DISSECT: an assignment-free Bayesian discovery method for species delimitation under the multispecies coalescent. Bioinformatics 31: 991–998. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Jong SC, Davis EE. (1972). Phialocephala humicola, a new hyphomycete. Mycologia 64: 1351–1356 [Google Scholar]
  • Jong SC, Davis EE. (1975). Phialocephala gabalongii as a synonym of Phialocephala humicola. Mycotaxon 3: 126–128. [Google Scholar]
  • Jörgensen K, Granath G, Strengbom J, et al. (2022). Links between boreal forest management, soil fungal communities and below-ground carbon sequestration. Functional Ecology 36: 392–405. [Google Scholar]
  • Katoh K, Standley DM. (2013). MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–780. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Kharwar RN, Verma VC, Strobel G, et al. (2008). The endophytic fungal complex of Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don. Current Science 95: 228–233. [Google Scholar]
  • Kekkonen M, Hebert PD. (2014). DNA barcode-based delineation of putative species: efficient start for taxonomic workflows. Molecular Ecology Resources 14: 706–715. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Kendrick WB. (1961). The Leptographium complex. Phialocephala gen. nov. Canadian Journal of Botany 39: 1079–1085. [Google Scholar]
  • Kendrick WB. (1963). The Leptographium complex. Two new species of Phialocephala. Canadian Journal of Botany 41: 1015–1023. [Google Scholar]
  • Kendrick WB. (ed) (1971). Taxonomy of Fungi Imperfecti. Proceedings of the First International Specialists’ Workshop Conference on Criteria and Terminology in the Classification of Fungi Imperfecti, Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada. University of Toronto Press, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  • Klich MA. (2002). Biogeography of Aspergillus species in soil and litter. Mycologia 94: 21–27. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Kiyuna T, An K-D, Kigawa R, et al. (2012). Bristle-like fungal colonizers on the stone walls of the Kitora and Takamatsuzuka Tumuli are identified as Kendrickiella phycomyces. Mycoscience 53: 446–459. [Google Scholar]
  • Landvik S. (1996). Neolecta, a fruit-body-producing genus of the basal ascomycetes, as shown by SSU and LSU DNA sequences. Mycological Research 100: 199–202. [Google Scholar]
  • Lee S, Go S-J. (2000). A polyphialidic hyphomycete Gonytrichum macrocladum new to Korea from the arable soil in Jinju-shi. Mycobiology 28: 127–129. [Google Scholar]
  • Letunic I, Bork P. (2016). Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Research 44: W242–W245. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Li C-X, Yu X-D, Dong W, et al. (2021). Freshwater hyphomycetes in Sordariomycetes: two new species of Tainosphaeria (Chaetosphaeriaceae, Chaetosphaeriales) from Thailand. Phytotaxa 509: 56–68. [Google Scholar]
  • Liu H, Pan F-J, Han X-Z, et al. (2020). A comprehensive analysis of the response of the fungal community structure to long-term continuous cropping in three typical upland crops. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 19: 866–880. [Google Scholar]
  • Lin CG, McKenzie EHC, Liu JK, et al. (2019). Hyaline-spored chaetosphaeriaceous hyphomycetes from Thailand and China, with a review of the family Chaetosphaeriaceae. Mycosphere 10: 655–700. [Google Scholar]
  • Lindau G. (1907). Fungi Imperfecti: Hyphomycetes (erste Hälfte), Mucedinaceae, Dematiaceae (Phaeosporae und Phaeodidymae). In: Dr. Rabenhorst’s Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Oesterreich und der Schweiz. 1. Pilze. 2nd ed. Verlag von Eruard Kummer, Leipzig, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • Link HF. (1809). Observationes in ordines plantarum naturales. Dissertatio I. Magazin der Gesellschaft Naturforschenden Freunde Berlin 3: 3–42. [Google Scholar]
  • Luo ZL, Hyde KD, Liu JK, et al. (2019). Freshwater Sordariomycetes. Fungal Diversity 99: 451–660. [Google Scholar]
  • Ma Y-R, Xia J-W, Gao J-M, et al. (2016). Anacacumisporium, a new genus based on morphology and molecular analyses from Hainan, China. Cryptogamie Mycologie 37: 45–59. [Google Scholar]
  • Magyar D, Shoemaker RA, Bobvos J, Crous PW, et al. (2011). Pyrigemmula, a novel hyphomycete genus on grapevine and tree bark from Hungary. Mycological Progress 10: 307–314. [Google Scholar]
  • Maharachchikumbura SSN, Chen Y, Ariyawansa HA, et al. (2021). Integrative approaches for species delimitation in Ascomycota. Fungal Diversity 109: 155–179. [Google Scholar]
  • Maggi O, Persiani AM. (1984). Codinaea coffeae and Phialocephala xalapensis, two new hyphomycetes from Mexico. Mycotaxon 20: 251–258. [Google Scholar]
  • Maggi O, Persiani AM, Casado MA, et al. (1990). Esdaphic mycoflora recovery in tropical forests after shifting cultivations. Acta Ecologica 11: 337–350. [Google Scholar]
  • Malloch D. (1981). Moulds: Their isolation, cultivation and identification. University of Toronto Press, Ontario, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  • Manawasinghe IS, Calabon MS, Jones EBG, et al. (2022). Mycosphere notes 345–386. Mycosphere 13: 454–557. [Google Scholar]
  • Mangenot F. (1952). Recherches méthodiques sur les champignons de certains bois en décomposition. Thesis, Paris, France. [Google Scholar]
  • Marin-Felix Y, Hernández-Restrepo M, Iturrieta-González I, et al. (2019). Genera of phytopathogenic fungi: GOPHY 3. Studies in Mycology 94: 1–124. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Markham NR, Zuker M. (2008). UNAFold: Software for Nucleic Acid Folding and Hybridization. Methods in Molecular Biology 453: 3–31. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Massee GE. (1887). British Pyrenomycetes. Grevillea 16(78): 34–39. [Google Scholar]
  • Matsushima T. (1975). Icones Microfungorum a Matsushima lectorum. Kobe, Japan. [Google Scholar]
  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. (2010). Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 Nov. 2010, New Orleans, LA: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Morgan-Jones G, Goos RD. (1992). Chloridium virescens and Helicosporium virescens, binominals for different fungi based on the same basionym Dematium virescens. Mycologia 84: 921–923. [Google Scholar]
  • Morgan-Jones G, Sinclair RC, Eicker A. (1991). Notes on Hyphomycetes. LXII: Concerning Chloridium virescens var. allantosporum, a new taxon, C. virescens var. caudigerum, and Chloridium phaeosporum, from southern Africa. Mycotaxon 41: 459–468. [Google Scholar]
  • Meyer J. (1959). Moisissures du sol et des litières de la region de Yangambi (Congo Belge). Publications de l’Institut national pour l’étude agronomique du Congo Belge 75: 1–211. [Google Scholar]
  • Meyer W, Irinyi L, Hoang MTV, et al. (2019). Database establishment for the secondary fungal DNA barcode translational elongation factor 1α (TEF1α). Genome 62: 160–169. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, et al. (2020). IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Molecular Biology and Evolution 37: 1530–1534. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Müller T, Philippi N, Dandekar T, et al. (2007). Distinguishing species. RNA 13: 1469–1472. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Müller E, von Arx JA. (1962). Die Gattungen der didymosporen Pyrenomyceten. Beiträge zur Kryptogamenflora der Schweiz 11(2): 1–922. [Google Scholar]
  • Mundra S, Kjønaas OJ, Morgado LN, et al. (2021). Soil depth matters: shift in composition and inter-kingdom co-occurrence patterns of microorganisms in forest soils. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 97: fiab022. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Nees von Esenbeck CGD, Nees von Esenbeck TFL. (1818). De plantis nonnullis e mycetoidearum regno tum nuper detectis, tum minus cognitis commentatio prior doctoris Nees ab Esenbeck et Friderici Nees fratrum. Nova Acta Physico-Medica Academiae Caesareae Leopoldino-Carolinae Naturae Curiosorum 9: 226–262. [Google Scholar]
  • Novinscak A, Goyer C, Zebarth BJ, et al. (2016). Novel P450nor gene detection assay used to characterize the prevalence and diversity of soil fungal denitrifiers. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 82: 4560–4569. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • O’Donnell K, Cigelnik E. (1997). Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 7: 103–116. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Odriozola I, Navrátilová D, Tláskalová P, et al. (2021). Predictors of soil fungal biomass and community composition in temperate mountainous forests in Central Europe. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 161: 108366. [Google Scholar]
  • Onofri S, Pagano S, Zucconi L. (1994). Conidiogenesis in Phialocephala humicola. Mycological Research 98: 745–748. [Google Scholar]
  • Paradis E. (2010). Pegas: an R package for population genetics with an integrated-modular approach. Bioinformatics 26: 419–420. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Patouillard NT, Lagerheim G. de (1891). Champignons de l’Equateur (Pugillus I). Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France 7: 158–184. [Google Scholar]
  • Persoon CH. (1794). Neuer Versuch einer systematischen Eintheilung der Schwämme. Neues Magazin für die Botanik 1: 63–80. [Google Scholar]
  • Persoon CH. (1822). Mycologia Europaea 1: 1–356. [Google Scholar]
  • Posada D. (2008). jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 1253–1256. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Prabhugaonkar A, Bhat DJ. (2009). Rattania setulifera, an undescribed endophytic hyphomycete on rattans from Western Ghats, India. Mycotaxon 108: 217–222. [Google Scholar]
  • Preuss CGT. (1851). Übersicht untersuchter pilze, besonders aus der umgegend von Hoyerswerda. Linnaea 24: 99–153. [Google Scholar]
  • Puillandre N, Lambert A, Brouillet S, et al. (2012). ABGD, Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery for primary species delimitation. Molecular Ecology 21: 1864–1877. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • R. Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  • Rabenhorst GL. (1844). Deutschlands Kryptogamenflora. 1. Pilze. Verlag Eduard Sommer, Leipzig, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, et al. 2018. Posterior summarisation in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67: 901–904. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Rao V, de Hoog GS. (1986). New or critical hyphomycetes from India. Studies in Mycology 28: 1–84. [Google Scholar]
  • Réblová M, Barr ME, Samuels GJ. (1999). Chaetosphaeriaceae, a new family for Chaetosphaeria and its relatives. Sydowia 51: 49–70. [Google Scholar]
  • Réblová M, Gams W. (1999) Teleomorph-anamorph connections in Ascomycetes. 1. Cylindrotrichum and Cacumisporium anamorphs of Chaetosphaeria. Czech Mycology 51: 1–40. [Google Scholar]
  • Réblová M, Gams W. (2000). Life-history of Ascomycetes: Two new species of Chaetosphaeria with Chloridium- and Chloridium-Dictyochaeta anamorphs. Mycoscience 41: 129–138. [Google Scholar]
  • Réblová M, Hernández-Restrepo M, Fournier J, et al. (2020). New insights into the systematics of Bactrodesmium and its allies and introducing new genera, species and morphological patterns in the Pleurotheciales and Savoryellales (Sordariomycetes). Studies in Mycology 95: 415–466. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Réblová M, Kolařík M, Nekvindová J, et al. (2021c). Phylogeny, global biogeography and pleomorphism of Zanclospora. Microorganisms 9: 706. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Réblová M, Kolařík M, Nekvindová J, et al. (2021b). Phylogenetic reassessment, taxonomy and biogeography of Codinaea and similar fungi. Journal of Fungi 7: 1097. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Réblová M, Miller AN, Rossman AY, et al. (2016) Recommendations for competing sexual-asexually typified generic names in Sordariomycetes (except Diaporthales, Hypocreales, and Magnaporthales). IMA Fungus 7: 131–153. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Réblová M, Nekvindová J, Hernández-Restrepo M. (2021d). Reflections on Menisporopsis, Multiguttulispora and Tainosphaeria using molecular and morphological data. Journal of Fungi 7: 438. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Réblová M, Nekvindová J, Kolařík M, et al. (2021a). Delimitation and phylogeny of Dictyochaeta, and introduction of Achrochaeta and Tubulicolla, genera nova. Mycologia 113: 390–433. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Réblová M, Nekvindová J, Miller AN. (2021e). Phylogeny and taxonomy of Catenularia and similar fungi with catenate conidia. MycoKeys 81: 1–44. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Réblová M, Winka K. (2000). Phylogeny of Chaetosphaeria and its anamorphs based on morphological and molecular data. Mycologia 92: 939–934. [Google Scholar]
  • Reddy SR, Reddy SS. (1980). Gonytrichum state of Melanopsammella inaequalis: a new record to Indian mycoflora. Current Science 49: 29–30. [Google Scholar]
  • Rehner S, Buckley E. (2005). A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-alpha sequences: evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia 97: 84–98. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Robert V, Szöke S, Eberhardt U, et al. (2011). The quest for a general and reliable fungal DNA barcode. The Open and Applied Informatics Journal 5: 45–61. [Google Scholar]
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, et al. (2012). MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Rossman AY, Samuels GJ, Rogerson CT, et al. (1999). Genera of Bionectriaceae, Hypocreaceae and Nectriaceae (Hypocreales, Ascomycetes). Studies in Mycology 42: 1–248. [Google Scholar]
  • Rossum van G, Drake FL. (2019). Python language reference, version 3. Python Software Foundation. [Google Scholar]
  • Saccardo PA. (1877). Fungi Italici Autographice Delineati. Fascs 1–4: tabs 1–160. Patavii, Italy. [Google Scholar]
  • Saccardo PA. (1879). Fungi Gallici lecti a cl. viris P. Brunaud, C.C. Gillet et Abb. Letendre. Michelia 1(5): 500–538. [Google Scholar]
  • Saccardo PA. (1880). Conspectus generum fungorum Italiae inferiorum nempe ad Sphaeropsideas, Melanconieas et Hyphomyceteas pertinentium systemate sporologico dispositorum. Michelia 2(6): 1–38. [Google Scholar]
  • Saccardo PA. (1886). Sylloge Hyphomycetum. Sylloge Fungorum 4: 1–807. [Google Scholar]
  • Sawada K, Watanabe S, Nguyen HL, et al. (2021). Comparison of the structure and diversity of root-associated and soil microbial communities between Acacia plantations and native tropical mountain forests. Frontiers in Microbiology 12: 735121. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Schoch CL, Seifert KA, Huhndorf SM, et al. (2012). Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for fungi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 6241–6246. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Schoch C, Sung GH, López-Giráldez F, et al. (2009). The Ascomycota tree of life: a phylum-wide phylogeny clarifies the origin and evolution of fundamental reproductive and ecological traits. Systematic Biology 58: 224–239. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Seifert KA. (2017). When should we describe species? IMA Fungus 8: A37–A39. [Google Scholar]
  • Seifert K, Morgan-Jones G, Gams W, et al. (2011). The Genera of Hyphomycetes. CBS Biodiversity Series no. 9: 1–997. CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, Netherlands [Google Scholar]
  • Sharma AD, Munjal RL. (1978). The genera Ceratocladium and Gonytrichum in India. Indian Phytopathology 31: 319–322. [Google Scholar]
  • Sklenář F, Jurjeviæ Ž, Houbraken J, et al. (2021). Re-examination of species limits in Aspergillus section Flavipedes using advanced species delimitation methods and description of four new species. Studies in Mycology 99: 100–120. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Sklenář F, Glässnerová K, Jurjeviæ Ž, et al. (2022). Taxonomy of Aspergillus series Versicolores: species reduction and lesson learned about intraspecific variability. Studies in Mycology 102: 53–93. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Sivasithamparam K. (1975). Two dematiaceous hyphomycetes with a similar mode of conidiogenesis. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 64: 335–338. [Google Scholar]
  • Somrithipol S, Sakayaroj J, Rungjindamai N, et al. (2008). Phylogenetic relationship of the coelomycete genus Infundibulomyces based on nuclear rDNA data. Mycologia 100: 735–741. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Stamatakis A. (2014). RAxML Version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30: 1312–1313. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Stielow JB, Lévesque CA, Seifert KA, et al. (2015). One fungus, which genes? Development and assessment of universal primers for potential secondary fungal DNA barcodes. Persoonia 35: 242–263. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Subramanian CV. (1955). Fungi imperfecti from Madras - VII. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences Section B 42(6): 283–292. [Google Scholar]
  • Sükösd Z, Knudsen B, Kjems J, et al. (2012). PPfold 3.0: Fast RNA secondary structure prediction using phylogeny and auxiliary data. Bioinformatics 28: 2691–2692. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Sun X, Hu Y-H, Wang J, et al. (2021). Efficient and stable metabarcoding sequencing data using a DNBSEQ-G400 sequencer validated by comprehensive community analyses. Gigabyte 2021. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Sutton BC. (1973). Hyphomycetes from Manitoba and Saskatchewan, Canada. Mycological Papers 132: 1–143. [Google Scholar]
  • Swart HJ. (1959). A comparative study of the genera Gonytrichum and Bisporomyces. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 25: 439–444. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. (2021). MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 11. Molecular Biology and Evolution 38: 3022–3027. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Tanney JB, Douglas B, Seifert KA. (2016) Sexual and asexual states of some endophytic Phialocephala species of Picea. Mycologia 108: 255–280. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Tanney JB, Seifert KA. (2020). Mollisiaceae: An overlooked lineage of diverse endophytes. Studies in Mycology 95: 293–380. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Põlme S, et al. (2014). Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science 346: 6213. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Torres-Garcia D, García D, Cano-Lira JF, et al. (2022). Two novel genera, Neostemphylium and Scleromyces (Pleosporaceae) from freshwater sediments and their global biogeography. Journal of Fungi 8: 868. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Trentini CP, Campanello PI, Villagra M, et al. (2020). Thinning partially mitigates the impact of Atlantic forest replacement by pine monocultures on the soil microbiome. Frontiers in Microbiology 11: 1491. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Tubaki K. (1963). Notes on the Japanese Hyphomycetes. I. Transactions of the Mycological Society of Japan 4: 83–90. [Google Scholar]
  • Tulasne LR, Tulasne C. (1863). Selecta Fungorum Carpologia, Tomus Secundus. Xylariei - Valsei - Sphaeriei. In imperiali typographeo excudebatur, Paris, France. [Google Scholar]
  • Udaiyan K. (1991). Some interesting hyphomycetes from the industrial water cooling towers of Madras. Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany 15: 627–647. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Beyma Thoe Kingma FH. (1940). Beschreibung einiger neuer Pilzarten aus dem Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Baarn (Nederland), VI. Mitteilung. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 6: 263–290. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Větrovský T, Baldrian P, Morais D. (2018). SEED 2: a user-friendly platform for amplicon high-throughput sequencing data analyses. Bioinformatics 34: 2292–2294. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Větrovský T, Kohout P, Kopecký M, et al. (2019). A meta-analysis of global fungal distribution reveals climate-driven patterns. Nature Communications 10: 5142. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Větrovský T, Morais D, Kohout P, et al. (2020). GlobalFungi, a global database of fungal occurrences from high-throughput-sequencing metabarcoding studies. Scientific Data 7: 228. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Vilgalys Mycology Lab – Duke University. Conserved primer sequences for PCR amplification of fungal rDNA. (available online: https://sites.duke.edu/vilgalyslab/rdna_primers_for_fungi). [Google Scholar]
  • Vilgalys R, Hester M. (1990). Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 4238–4246. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • von Höhnel FXR. (1903). Mycologische Fragmente (Fortsetzung). Annales Mycologici 1: 522–534. [Google Scholar]
  • von Höhnel FXR. (1919). Mykologische Fragmente. Annales Mycologici 17: 114–133. [Google Scholar]
  • Vu D, Groenewald M, de Vries M, et al. (2019). Large-scale generation and analysis of filamentous fungal DNA barcodes boosts coverage for kingdom fungi and reveals thresholds for fungal species and higher taxon delimitation. Studies in Mycology 92: 135–154. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang Y, Jie CY, Hyde KD, et al. (2017). Chloridium terricola sp. nov. from China. Mycotaxon 132: 79–86. [Google Scholar]
  • Wang CJK, Wilcox HE. (1985). New species of ectendomycorrhizal and pseudomycorrhizal fungi: Phialophora finlandica, Chloridium paucisporum, and Phialocephala fortinii. Mycologia 77: 951–958. [Google Scholar]
  • Weber G, Spaaij F, Wingfield MJ. (1996). Leptographium costaricense sp. nov., a new species from roots of Talauma sambuensis from Costa Rica. Mycological Research 100: 732–736. [Google Scholar]
  • Wei TP, Wang KY, Zhang H, et al. (2022). A new species and a new combination of Chloridium from southwest China. Phytotaxa 549: 67–76. [Google Scholar]
  • Wei MJ, Zhang H, Dong W, et al. (2018). Introducing Dictyochaeta aquatica sp. nov. and two new species of Chloridium (Chaetosphaeriaceae, Sordariomycetes) from aquatic habitats. Phytotaxa 362: 187–199. [Google Scholar]
  • White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, et al. (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications (Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, et al., eds), Academic Press, San Diego, California: 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  • Wingfield M, Van Wyk PS, Wingfield BD. (1987). Reclassification of Phialocephala based on conidial development. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 89: 509–520. [Google Scholar]
  • Wolf M, Friedrich, Dandekar T, et al. (2005). CBC Analyzer: inferring phylogenies based on compensatory base changes in RNA secondary structures. In Silico Biology 5: 0027. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Wu WP, Diao YZ. (2022). Anamorphic chaetosphaeriaceous fungi from China. Fungal Diversity 116: 1–546 [Google Scholar]
  • Yang W, Li C, Wang S, et al. (2021). Influence of biochar and biochar-based fertilizer on yield, quality of tea and microbial community in an acid tea orchard soil. Applied Soil Ecology 166: 104005. [Google Scholar]
  • Yang J, Liu NG, Liu JK, et al. (2018). Phylogenetic placement of Cryptophiale, Cryptophialoidea, Nawawia, Neonawawia gen. nov. and Phialosporostilbe. Mycosphere 9: 1132–1150. [Google Scholar]
  • Yasanthika E, Tennakoon DS, Farias ARG, et al. (2022). New soil-inhabiting Chaetosphaeriaceous records from Thailand. Asian Journal of Mycology 5: 16–30. [Google Scholar]
  • Yu Y, Blair C, He XJ. (2020). RASP (Reconstruct Ancestral State in Phylogenies): A tool for historical biogeography. Molecular Biology and Evolution 37: 604–606. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Yuan HS, Lu X, Dai YC, et al. (2020). Fungal diversity notes 1277–1386: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 104: 1–266. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang N, Castlebury LA, Miller AN, et al. (2007). An overview of the systematics of the Sordariomycetes based on a four-gene phylogeny. Mycologia 98: 1076–1087. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang Y, Dai S, Huang X, et al. (2020). pH-induced changes in fungal abundance and composition affects soil heterotrophic nitrification after 30 days of artificial pH manipulation. Geoderma 366: 114255. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang J, Kapli P, Pavlidis P, et al. (2013). A general species delimitation method with applications to phylogenetic placements. Bioinformatics 29: 2869–2876. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhou J, Jiang X, Zhou B, et al. (2016). Thirty-four years of nitrogen fertilization decreases fungal diversity and alters fungal community composition in black soil in northeast China. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 95: 135–143. [Google Scholar]
  • Zuker M. (2003). Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 31: 3406–3415. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Studies in Mycology are provided here courtesy of Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/140153072
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/140153072

Article citations

Data 


Data behind the article

This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.