Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Background

Sonneratia apetala Francis Buchanan-Hamilton (Sonneratiaceae, Myrtales), is a woody species with high adaptability and seed production capacity. S. apetala is widely cultivated worldwide as the main species for mangrove construction. However, the study of diseases affecting S. apetala is limitted, with only a few fungal pathogens being recorded. Cryphonectriaceae (Diaporthales) species are the main pathogens of plants. They can cause canker diseases to several trees and thereby seriously threaten the health of the hosts. These pathogens include Cryphonectria parasitica (Cryphonectriaceae) causing chestnut blight on Castanea (Rigling and Prospero 2017) and Cytospora chrysosperma (Cytosporaceae) causing polar and willow canker to Populus and Salix (Wang et al. 2015) . Therefore, the timely detection of of Cryphonectriaceae canker pathogens on S. apetala is extremely important for protecting the mangrove forests.

New information

Two diaporthalean fungi, Celoporthe guangdongensis and Cytospora rhizophorae have been reported for the first time to cause canker on the branches of S. apetala. C. guangdongensis is significantly pathogenic and C. rhizophorae is saprophytic on S. apetala.

Free full text 


Logo of biodivdatajPensoft PublishersAboutEditorial TeamAuthor GuidelinesSubmissionBiodiversity Data Journal
Biodivers Data J. 2020; 8: e55251.
Published online 2020 Nov 3. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e55251
PMCID: PMC7655784
PMID: 33223911

New records of Celoporthe guangdongensis and Cytospora rhizophorae on mangrove apple in China

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Abstract

Background

Sonneratia apetala Francis Buchanan-Hamilton (Sonneratiaceae, Myrtales), is a woody species with high adaptability and seed production capacity. S. apetala is widely cultivated worldwide as the main species for mangrove construction. However, the study of diseases affecting S. apetala is limitted, with only a few fungal pathogens being recorded. Cryphonectriaceae (Diaporthales) species are the main pathogens of plants. They can cause canker diseases to several trees and thereby seriously threaten the health of the hosts. These pathogens include Cryphonectria parasitica (Cryphonectriaceae) causing chestnut blight on Castanea (Rigling and Prospero 2017) and Cytospora chrysosperma (Cytosporaceae) causing polar and willow canker to Populus and Salix (Wang et al. 2015) . Therefore, the timely detection of of Cryphonectriaceae canker pathogens on S. apetala is extremely important for protecting the mangrove forests.

New information

Two diaporthalean fungi, Celoporthe guangdongensis and Cytospora rhizophorae have been reported for the first time to cause canker on the branches of S. apetala. C. guangdongensis is significantly pathogenic and C. rhizophorae is saprophytic on S. apetala.

Keywords: canker, Diaporthales , pathogen, taxonomy

Introduction

Mangrove apple (Sonneratia apetala Francis Buch.-Ham., Sonneratiaceae, Myrtales), which is the main species of mangrove forests, was introduced to China for restoration purposes in 1985 and its plantation has greatly improved the soil fertility with multitudes of useful features as a pioneer restoration species (Jayatissa et al. 2002, Ren et al. 2009). S. apetala has thereby become an important woody species with great economic and ecological importance in China (Ren et al. 2009). However, studies on fungal diseases of S. apetala are limited, with only 4 fungal species having been reported as pathogens of this plant so far (namely Helicascus kanaloanus, Lulworthia grandispora, Neofusicoccum mangiferae and Phomopsis sonneratiae), which had severely hindered any developmental measures toward the protection of mangrove forests (Farr and Rossman 2019, Qiu et al. 2018).

Species of Cryphonectriaceae Gryzenh. & M.J. Wingf. (Diaporthales), as a group of important pathogens, have been reported to infect bark beetles and wood (Gryzenhout et al. 2004). Cryphonectria species, which are the main members of Cryphonectriaceae, can cause serious canker diseases on chestnut, eucalyptus and oak trees (Rigling and Prospero 2017, Jiang et al. 2019, Jiang et al. 2018b). For example, Cryphonectria parasitica, Cryphonectria neoparasitica and Cryphonectria japonica cause chestnut blight on Castanea (Jiang et al. 2019); Cryphonectria cubensis causes severe stem cankers on Eucalyptus (Sharma et al. 2010); Cryphonectria quercicola and Cryphonectria quercus cause stem canker on Quercus (Jiang et al. 2018b). In addition, Celoporthe (Cryphonectriaceae, Diaporthales) is a notorious pathogenic genus that infects the barks of Myrtales plants (Ali et al. 2018, Wang et al. 2018). Surveys in southern China for pathogens of trees belonging to the family Myrtaceae identified several Celoporthe species (Zhou et al. 2008). Cytospora (Cytosporaceae, Diaporthales) is a genus that causes serious dieback and stem canker diseases that commonly affects woody plants (Fan et al. 2015, Wang et al. 2014). These pathogens includes Cytospora chrysosperma (Cytosporaceae), which causes polar and willow canker on Populus and Salix (Fan et al. 2019, Wang et al. 2015). In summary, fungal species of Diaporthales can seriously threaten the healthy growth of several woody plants.

Overall, fungal species of the Diaporthales can seriously threaten the healthy growth of mangrove forest when found to infect woody species such as Mangrove apple. During our disease surveys on Mangrove apple trees in Guangdong province, necrosis and canker on the trunks, branches or twigs of S. apetala were observed and orange-to-red cankers were photographed (Fig. (Fig.1).1). Two diaporthalean fungi were recognized based on the morphological characteristics of conidiomata and conidia from cankered tissues. These findings can provide significant information toward the protection of Mangrove apple trees, including resistance breeding.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is bdj-08-e55251-g001.jpg
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/417594

Disease symptoms. A and B. cankered branches; C. Conidiomata of Celoporthe guangdongensis on branches; D. Conidiomata of Cytospora rhizophorae on branches.

Materials and methods

Samples and isolates

The branches of 3 S. apetala trees with canker lesions with conidiomata were collected and isolations were conducted in the laboratory for 2 types of infections. For cankered lesions on the bark, the branches were cleaned with tap water and small pieces of bark (sized approximately 2 mm × 2 mm) were cut from the junction of the diseased and healthy portions. These small pieces were disinfected in 75% ethanol for 5 s and transferred to a 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) solution for 2 min. Then, the samples were washed thrice with sterile water and inoculated on the surface of potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates. For branches with conidiomata, single conidial isolates were obtained by removing the spore masses into axenic water in order to obtain the suspension and spread the suspension on to the surface of PDA plates for isolation (Jiang et al. 2018b).

Morphological studies

The morphological features of the pathogenic fungi were observed on diseased plant tissues following Fan et al. (2018). Species identification was performed based on the morphological characters of the sporocarp produced on the diseased spots. First, cross-sections were made using a double-edge blade. Then, the morphological characters of sporocarp were recorded. For example, the size of conidiomata and locules were measured by using a dissecting stereomicroscope, while the shape and size of conidiophores and conidia were determined using a Leica compound microscope (LM, DM 2500). Finally, sporocarps were sectioned using a hand-operated blade and more than 50 spores were selected randomly and measured under the Leica compound microscope.

DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing

Aerial mycelium of fungi grown on PDA (for 7 days at 25ºC) was used to extract the genomic DNA. The DNA extraction was performed by the modified CTAB method (Doyle and Doyle 1990). The internal transcribed spacer of rDNA (ITS) was amplified with the primers ITS1 and ITS4 (White et al. 1990). The translation elongation factor-1 alpha (TEF) was amplified with the primers EF1-688F and EF1-1251R (Alves et al. 2008). Two regions within the β-tubulin (BT1/BT2) gene were amplified with the primers Bt1a/Bt1b and Bt2a/Bt2b (Glass and Donaldson 1995). PCR amplification and sequencing were performed following the protocol of Wang et al. (2018). The PCR amplification products were estimated visually by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gel at 60 V for 90 min. DNA sequencing was performed using an ABI PRISM® 3730XL DNA Analyzer with the BigDye® Terminater Kit v.3.1 (Invitrogen) at the Shanghai Invitrogen Biological Technology Company Limited (Beijing, China). Two isolates were detected for each species.

DNA sequence analysis

The 10 new sequences generated in this study and the reference sequences of Celoporthe and Cytospora isolates selected from recent studies, were included in the phylogenetic analyses (TW). These sequences were aligned with MAFFT v.7 (Katoh and Toh 2010) and manually adjusted. For Celoporthe, phylogenetic analyses were performed, based on the combined ITS-BT1-BT2-TEF sequences by PAUP v. 4.0b10 (Swofford and Sullivan 2003) for Maximum Parsimony (MP), PhyML v.3.0 (Guindon et al. 2010) for Maximum Likelihood (ML) and MrBayes v.3.1.2 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003) for Bayesian Inference (BI), respectively. For Cytospora, ITS sequences were used to conduct phylogenetic analyses using the same software. Information on the isolates, the genes sequenced and GenBank accessions used in this study are all included in Suppl. material 1.

Pathogenicity analysis

For pathogenicity trials, the 2 isolates TLY1-15 (Celoporthe guangdongensis) and TLY2-42 (Cytospora rhizophorae) were randomly selected for the inoculation studies. The inoculations were performed on the branches of healthy S. apetala trees as per the the methods described by Chen et al. (2011). Briefly, the detached branches (aged: 1–2-years-old, approximately 1.0-cm diameter) from healthy S. apetala trees were selected and cut into 20-cm-long pieces. A total of 90 fresh branches were used for the pathogenicity tests and 45 branches were cut and inoculated with each of the two isolates or sterile PDA, respectively. The other branches were scalded and inoculated with the same 2 isolates or sterile PDA. The inoculated branches were sealed in Petri dishes with a gauze immersed in sterile water and maintained in a greenhouse at 25°C.

After 2 weeks, some symptoms were detected on the surface of the inoculated branches. The lesion sizes in the cambium were measured from all experimental and control groups. Re-isolations were performed on PDA and the re-isolation cultures were identified by DNA testing.

Differences in the lesion sizes between the isolates and negative controls were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by least significant difference (LSD) tests. Statistical analysis was performed by using the R v.3.4.3 software and considered to be significant at P < 0.05.

Taxon treatments

Celoporthe guangdongensis

S. F. Chen, Gryzenhout, J. Roux, Y. J. Xie, M.j. Wingfield, & X.D. Zhou (2011)

6F829486-13BC-5D5D-A931-C1F71AB16B0D

Materials

  1. Type status: Other material. Occurrence: catalogNumber: TLY1-15; TLY1-18; recordedBy: C.S. Qin & L.Y. Tian; Taxon: scientificName: Celoporthe guangdongensis; kingdom: Fungi; order: Diaporthales; family: Cytosporaceae; genus: Celoporthe; Location: country: China; stateProvince: Guangdong; locality: Zhongshan City, Hengmen village, 113.5810°N, 22.4820°E; verbatimLocality: 2.546 m; Identification: identifiedBy: L.Y. Tian; identificationReferences: (Kohlmeyer and Kohlmeyer 1971); Event: year: 2018; month: September; day: 26; habitat: on branches of Sonneratia apetala Buch.-Ham.; Record Level: language: en

Description

Conidiomata eustromatic, superficial to slightly immersed, pulvinate to conical without necks, occasionally with a neck, orange when young, black when mature, conidiomatal bases above the bark surface 300–500 µm high, 200–1000 µm diam. Conidiomatal locules with even to convoluted inner surfaces, occasionally multilocular, locules 100–650 µm diam. Stromatic tissue pseudoparenchymatous. Conidiomatal locules multilocular, seldom unilocular, locules 30–500 mm. Conidiophores hyaline, branched irregularly at the base or above, with or without separating septa, (5–)8.5–13.5(–16) × 1.5–2.5 µm. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, determinate, apical or lateral on branches beneath a septum, cylindrical with or without attenuated apices, (1.5–)2–3 µm wide, collarette and periclinal thickening inconspicuous. Conidia hyaline, non-septate, oblong to cylindrical to ovoid, occasionally allantoid, (2.3–)3.1–3.5(–4.6) × (1–)1.5(–2) µm, exuded as bright luteous tendrils or droplets (Fig. (Fig.22).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is bdj-08-e55251-g002.jpg
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/417597

Morphology of Celoporthe guangdongensis from Sonneratia apetala. A. Conidiomata; B. Transverse sections through conidiomata; C–D. Conidiophores; E–G. Conidia. Scale bars: B = 100 μm; C–G = 10 μm.

Notes

Celoporthe guangdongensis was initially reported on Eucalyptus in Guangdong Province of China as a canker pathogen (Chen et al. 2011). Two isolates from the present study cluster in a clade closely related to CMW 12750 (Fig. (Fig.3)3) and conidial dimensions measured in the present study fit exactly with those in Chen et al. (2011).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is bdj-08-e55251-g003.jpg
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/450200

Phylogram of Celoporthe from a Maximum Likelihood analysis, based on combined ITS, BT1, BT2 and TEF genes. MP, ML and BI bootstrap support values are shown in order. The tree is rooted with Aurifilum marmelostroma and Holocryphia capensis. Strains in the current study are in blue.

Cytospora rhizophorae

Kohlm. & E. Kohlm (1971)

80E71A52-74B4-5FD5-A5AE-AE1E3A00CC3E

Materials

  1. Type status: Other material. Occurrence: catalogNumber: TLY1-13; TLY2-42; recordedBy: C.S. Qin & L.Y. Tian; Taxon: scientificName: Cytospora rhizophorae; kingdom: Fungi; order: Diaporthales; family: Cytosporaceae; genus: Cytospora; Location: country: China; stateProvince: Guangdong; locality: Zhongshan City, Hengmen village, 113.5810°N, 22.4820°E; verbatimElevation: 2.546 m; Identification: identifiedBy: L.Y. Tian; identificationReferences: (Kohlmeyer and Kohlmeyer 1971); Event: year: 2018; month: September; day: 26; habitat: on the twig of Sonneratia apetala Buch.-Ham.; Record Level: language: en

Description

Pycnidial stromata ostiolated, immersed in bark, scattered, erumpent through the surface of bark, discoid, with favaginous multiple locules. Ectostromatic disc black, circular to ovoid, (300–)400–850(–950) µm in diam. Locule numerous, arranged irregularly with common walls, (100–)200–250(–350) µm in diam. Conidiophores hyaline, branched at base or not branched, thin walled, filamentous, (4.5–)6–14(–16) × 1–2 µm. Conidiogenous cells enteroblastic polyphialidic, (1.3–)2–4.5(–5.5) × 1–2.5 µm. Conidia hyaline, allantoid, smooth, aseptate, thin-walled, (3–)3.5–5(–6.1) × 1–1.5 μm (Fig. (Fig.44).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is bdj-08-e55251-g004.jpg
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/417598

Morphology of Cytospora rhizophorae from Sonneratia apetala. A–B. Conidiomata; C–D. Transverse sections through conidiomata; E–F. Conidiophores; G–H. Conidia. Scale bars: A–B = 200 μm; C = 100 μm; D = 50 μm; E–G = 10 μm; H = 5 μm.

Notes

Cytospora rhizophorae was initially introduced as mangrove fungi on Rhizophora species (Kohlmeyer and Kohlmeyer 1971). Two isolates from the present study, together with MUCC302 and CBS 116861, formed a distinct clade (Fig. (Fig.5).5). Additionally, the morphology observed in this study fit exactly with the primary description (Kohlmeyer and Kohlmeyer 1971).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is bdj-08-e55251-g005.jpg
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/450201

Phylogram of Cytospora from a Maximum Likelihood analysis, based on ITS sequences. MP, ML and BI bootstrap support values are shown in order. The tree is rooted with Diaporthe vaccinii. Strains in the current study are in blue.

Analysis

Molecular phylogeny

Three isolations (iTLY1-18 inclusive) obtained from the branches of S. apetala with canker lesions and 4 isolations (TLY1-15 inclusive) from branches with conidiomata had the same cultural phenotypes on PDA. Another 4 isolations (TLY1-13 and TLY2-42 inclusive) collected from the branches with similar conidiomata showed the same cultural phenotypes on PDA. Finally, we selected the TLY1-18 and TLY1-15, TLY1-13 and TLY2-42 for molecular phylogeny.

In the genus Celoporthe, the combined ITS, BT1, BT2 and TEF alignment contained 23 sequences (including 2 outgroups) and 1684 characters including alignment gaps; of which 1387 were parsimony informative, 159 were variable and parsimony uninformative, and 138 were constant. The MP analysis revealed 2 equally most-parsimonious trees; the first tree (TL = 367, CI = 0.907, RI = 0.934, RC = 0.848) is shown in Fig. Fig.3.3. The topology of the phylogenetic trees obtained from ML and Bayes were similar to that of the MP tree. The Celoporthe isolates from the present study cluster in a clade were found to be closely related to the ex-type of C. guangdongensis CMW 12750 (Fig. (Fig.33).

In the genus Cytospora, the ITS alignment contained 24 sequences (including one outgroup) and 620 characters including alignment gaps; of which 442 were parsimony informative, 71 were variable and parsimony uninformative and 107 were constant. The MP analysis resulted in 21 equally most-parsimonious trees; the first tree (TL = 251, CI = 0.853, RI = 0.908, RC = 0.774) is shown in Fig. Fig.5.The5.The topology of phylogenetic trees obtained from ML and Bayes were similar to that of the MP tree. The Cytospora isolates from the present study and 2 C. rhizophorae strains were clustered in a supported clade (Fig. (Fig.55).

Pathogenicity trials

The isolates of Celoporthe guangdongensis, TLY1-15 on S. apetala in the greenhouse showed pathogenicity, but no pathogenicity was detected in any of the inoculations with the blank control or Cytospora rhizophorae within 6 weeks. Two weeks after inoculation, bark lesion was shown on the scalded branches inoculated with C. guangdongensis. Subsequently, the lesion was also exhibited on the wound of S. apetala trees branches treated with C. guangdongensis (Fig. (Fig.6).6). The two treatments inoculated with C. guangdongensis on the branches of S. apetala produced significantly longer lesions as compared with that in the control after 4 weeks (P = 0.05) (Fig. (Fig.7).7). Moreover, yellow or orange fruiting structures and cankers were produced on the barks inoculated with C. guangdongensis after 4 weeks (Suppl. material 2). However, all treatments inoculated with C. rhizophorae and the blank control produced no bark lesions. The cultural phenotypes and ITS sequences of re-isolations were the same as the tested strains.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is bdj-08-e55251-g006.jpg
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/417599

Lesions resulting from inoculation of Celoporthe guangdongensis and Cytospora rhizophorae on to Sonneratia apetala branches and wound response on the negative controls; negative control (a), Celoporthe guangdongensis (b), Cytospora rhizophorae (c). Line 1, inoculated on to incised wound; line 2, inoculated on to scald wounds.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is bdj-08-e55251-g007.jpg
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/417601

Histogram showing the average lesion area (mm2) resulting from inoculations of Sonneratia apetala with Celoporthe guangdongensis (TLY1-15) and Cytospora rhizophorae (TLY2-42). Treatment 1 inoculated on to incised wound; Treatment 2 inoculated on to scald wounds. Bars represent 95% confidence limits for each treatment. Different letters above the bars indicate treatments that statistically were significantly different (P = 0.05).

Discussion

As important pathogens inhabiting tree barks on several plant hosts, several fungal species belonging to the Diaporthales order have been reported as important fungal taxa in Sordariomycetes (Fan et al. 2018, Jiang et al. 2018a). In the present study, 2 species in Diaporthales, Celoporthe guangdongensis and Cytospora rhizophorae, were first confirmed on the mangrove plant S. apetala, based on the comparisons of their conidial characteristics and DNA sequences data. As reported previously, Celoporthe and Cytospora are both genera that include several species causing serious economic losses on wood production (Fan et al. 2015, Wang et al. 2018), which suggests that the 2 fungal species reported in this paper mayt severely damage S. apetala.

C. guangdongensis have been confirmed to be an important canker pathogen on Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae, Myrtales), although only 1 isolate has been preserved (Chen et al. 2011). In our study, C. guangdongensis isolates were obtained from S. apetala (Sonneratiaceae, Myrtales), indicating that Eucalyptus trees were not unique host of this species. As S. apetala belongs to Myrtales, the conclusion that Celoporthe species are host-specific to Myrtales species is accurate based on our research (Chen et al. 2011). Moreover, C. guangdongensis arise from both non-native Myrtales species in China, implying that C. guangdongensis might not be native to China. However, data on more number of strains from different places are warranted to confirm the origin of C. guangdongensis. In addition, considering that Celoporthe spp. can infect several plant species (Nakabonge et al. 2006, Wang et al. 2018), it is believe that C. guangdongensis may also possess the ability to infect other tree species. Therefore, more research are warranted be design control measures for related diseases.

C. rhizophorae has been reported as an endophytic and pathogenic fungus that is host-specific to mangrove plants and occurrs in almost mangrove habitats (Kohlmeyer and Kohlmeyer 1971, Wier et al. 2000). Similarly, C. rhizophorae was found on the branches of S. apetala in our study. However, this fungus showed no pathogenicity to S. apetala, because no extensions were detected on the scalded branches in 6 weeks after innoculation with this strain. In fact, several fungi in the Cytospora genus have been reported as necrotrophic pathogens (Zhou et al. 2020, Su et al. 2018). Thus, based on the previous studies by other researchers and the innoculation outcomes in the present study, we can infer that C. rhizophorae is presently saprophytic to S. apetala. However, the possibility that C. rhizophorae can kill the tissues of S. apetala cannot be excluded, because the condition of the inoculation test was different from the natural conditions, moreover, C. rhizophorae has been reported to cause death in some plants, including Rizophora mangle (Perdomo et al. 2018, Wier et al. 2000).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material 1

Isolates used in this study, the genes sequenced and GenBank accessions

Data type

Table

Brief description

Isolates used in this study, the genes sequenced and GenBank accessions

File: oo_450216.doc

Long yan Tian,Chang sheng Qin

Supplementary material 2

Fruiting structures and cankers were produced on the bark inoculated with C. guangdongensis after four weeks.

Data type

image

Brief description

Fruiting structures and cankers were produced on the bark inoculated with C. guangdongensis after four weeks.

File: oo_455046.jpg

Long yan Tian
XML Treatment for Celoporthe guangdongensis:
XML Treatment for Cytospora rhizophorae:

Acknowledgements

This study is financed by the research foundation of key-area research and development programme of Guangdong Province (2020B020214001) and the Guangdong basic and applied basic research of the joint regional foundation (Youth project) (2019A1515110596).

Funding Statement

This study is financed by the Research Foundation of Key-Area research and Development Program of Guangdong Province(2020B020214001) and the National Department (Forestry) of Public Benefit (201304408).

Author contributions

L. Tian, J. Xu, and D. Zhao performed the experiments. L. Tian and C. Qin analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

References

  • Ali Daniel B., Marincowitz Seonju, Wingfield Michael J., Roux Jolanda, Crous Pedro W., McTaggart Alistair R. Novel Cryphonectriaceae from La Réunion and South Africa, and their pathogenicity on Eucalyptus. Mycological Progress. 2018;17(8):953–966. 10.1007/s11557-018-1408-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Alves A., Crous P. W., Correia A., Phillips A. J. Morphological and molecular data reveal cryptic speciation in Lasiodiplodia theobromae. Fungal Diversity. 2008;28:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • Chen ShuaiFei, Gryzenhout Marieka, Roux Jolanda, Xie Y., Wingfield Michael, Zhou Xudong. Novel species of Celoporthe from Eucalyptus and Syzygium trees in China and Indonesia. Mycologia. 2011;103:1384–1410. 10.3852/11-006. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen S. F., Pavlic D., Roux J., Slippers B., Xie Y. J., Wingfield M. J., Zhou X. D. Characterization of Botryosphaeriaceae from plantation-grown Eucalyptus species in South China. Plant Pathology. 2011;60(4):739–751. 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02431.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Doyle J. J., Doyle J. L. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus. 1990;12:13–15. [Google Scholar]
  • Fan Xin-Lei, Tian Cheng-Ming, Yang Qin, Liang Ying-Mei, You Chong-Juan, Zhang Yu-Bo. Cytospora from Salix in northern China. Mycotaxon. 2015;129(2):303–315. 10.5248/129.303. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fan X. L., Bezerra J. D.P., Tian C. M., Crous P. W. Families and genera of diaporthalean fungi associated with canker and dieback of tree hosts. Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of fungi. 2018;40(1):119–134. 10.3767/persoonia.2018.40.05. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fan X. L., Bezerra J. D.P., Tian C. M., Crous P. W. Cytospora (Diaporthales) in China. Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of fungi. 2019;45:1–45. 10.3767/persoonia.2020.45.01. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Farr D,F, Rossman A,Y. Fungal Databases, U.S. National Fungus Collections, ARS, USDA. https://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/ [2019-03-04T00:00:00+02:00];
  • Glass N L, Donaldson G C. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1995;61(4):1323–1330. 10.1128/aem.61.4.1323-1330.1995. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gryzenhout M., Myburg H., Merwe N. A., Wingfield B. D., Wingfield M. J. Chrysoporthe, a new genus to accommodate Cryphonectria cubensis. Studies in Mycology. 2004;50:119–142. [Google Scholar]
  • Guindon Stéphane, Dufayard Jean-François, Lefort Vincent, Anisimova Maria, Hordijk Wim, Gascuel Olivier. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology. 2010;59(3):307–321. 10.1093/sysbio/syq010. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jayatissa LKN, Dahdouh-Guebas F, Koedam N. A review of the floral composition and distribution of mangroves in Sri Lanka. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 2002;138(1):29–43. 10.1046/j.1095-8339.2002.00002.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jiang Ning, Bonthond Guido, Fan Xin-Lei, Tian Cheng-Ming. Neopestalotiopsis rosicola sp. nov. causing stem canker of Rosa chinensis in China. Mycotaxon. 2018;133(2):271–283. 10.5248/133.271. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jiang N, Fan X, Yang Q, Du Z, Tian C. Two novel species of Cryphonectria from Quercus in China. Phytotaxa. 2018;347(3) 10.11646/phytotaxa.347.3.5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jiang N., Fan X. L., Tian C. M. Identification and pathogenicity of Cryphonectriaceae species associated with chestnut canker in China. Plant Pathology. 2019;68(6):1132–1145. 10.1111/ppa.13033. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Katoh Kazutaka, Toh Hiroyuki. Parallelization of the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(15):1899–1900. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq224. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kohlmeyer Jan, Kohlmeyer Erika. Marine fungi from Tropical America and Africa. Mycologia. 1971;63(4):831–861. 10.2307/3758050. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nakabonge Grace, Gryzenhout Marieka, Roux Jolanda, Wingfield Brenda D., Wingfield Michael J. Celoporthe dispersa gen. et sp. nov. from native Myrtales in South Africa. Studies in Mycology. 2006;55:255–267. 10.3114/sim.55.1.255. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Perdomo Omar Paíno, Miniño Virgilio, Rodríguez de Francisco Luis, León Yolanda. Cytospora rhizophorae Kohlm. & E. Kohlm (Valsaceae, Ascomycota) en la República Dominicana. Ciencia, Ambiente y Clima. 2018;1(1):23–31. 10.22206/cac.2018.v1i1.pp23-31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Qiu A. L., Yuan Y., Lin Q., He H., Liu L. L. First report of leaf spot caused by Neofusicoccum mangiferae on Sonneratia apetala in China. Plant Disease. 2018;102(12):2640–2640. 10.1094/pdis-03-18-0459-pdn. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ren Hai, Lu Hongfang, Shen Weijun, Huang Charlie, Guo Qinfeng, Li Zhi’an, Jian Shuguang. Sonneratia apetala Buch.Ham in the mangrove ecosystems of China: An invasive species or restoration species? Ecological Engineering. 2009;35(8):1243–1248. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.05.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rigling Daniel, Prospero Simone. Cryphonectria parasitica, the causal agent of chestnut blight: invasion history, population biology and disease control. Molecular Plant Pathology. 2017;19(1):7–20. 10.1111/mpp.12542. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J. P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(12):1572–1574. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sharma J. K., Mohanan C., Florence E. J. M. Occurrence of Cryphonectria canker disease of Eucalyptus in Kerala, India*. Annals of Applied Biology. 2010;106(2):265–276. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1985.tb03116.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Su Yanyan, Li Hui-Guang, Wang Yonglin, Li Shuang, Wang Hou-Ling, Yu Lu, He Fang, Yang Yanli, Feng Cong-Hua, Shuai Peng, Liu Chao, Yin Weilun, Xia Xinli. Poplar miR472a targeting NBS-LRRs is involved in effective defence against the necrotrophic fungus Cytospora chrysosperma. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2018 10.1093/jxb/ery304. [Abstract] [CrossRef]
  • Swofford David L., Sullivan Jack. Phylogeny inference based on parsimony and other methods using PAUP. The Phylogenetic Handbook. 2003:267–312. 10.1017/cbo9780511819049.010. [CrossRef]
  • Wang Wen, Liu QianLi, Li GuoQing, Liu FeiFei, Chen ShuaiFei. Phylogeny and pathogenicity of Celoporthe Species from Plantation Eucalyptus in Southern China. Plant Disease. 2018;102(10):1915–1927. 10.1094/pdis-12-17-2002-re. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang Xuli, Zang Rui, Yin Zhiyuan, Kang Zhensheng, Huang Lili. Delimiting cryptic pathogen species causing apple Valsa canker with multilocus data. Ecology and Evolution. 2014;4(8):1369–1380. 10.1002/ece3.1030. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang Yan-Li, Lu Quan, Decock Cony, Li Yong-Xia, Zhang Xing-Yao. Cytospora species from Populus and Salix in China with C. davidiana sp. nov. Fungal Biology. 2015;119(5):420–432. 10.1016/j.funbio.2015.01.005. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • White T. J., Bruns T., Lee S., Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocols. 1990:315–322. 10.1016/b978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1. [CrossRef]
  • Wier Andrew M., Tattar Terry A., Klekowski Edward J. Disease of Red Mangrove (Rhizophora mangle) in Southwest Puerto Rico Caused by Cytospora rhizophorae1. BIOTROPICA. 2000;32(2) 10.1646/0006-3606(2000)032[0299:dormrm]2.0.co;2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhou X, Xie Y, Chen S, F, Wingfield M, J. Diseases of eucalypt plantations in China: challenges and opportunities. Fungal Diversity. 2008;32:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhou Xian, Pan Meng, Li Haoyu, Tian Chengming, Fan Xinlei. Dieback of Euonymus alatus (Celastraceae) caused by Cytospora haidianensis sp. nov. in China. Forests. 2020;11(5) 10.3390/f11050524. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biodiversity Data Journal are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

Citations & impact 


This article has not been cited yet.

Impact metrics

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/93704263
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/93704263

Data 


Data behind the article

This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.