Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of palynological method and chromatographic analysis combined with chemometrics to identify botanical origin of propolis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been a growing trend in consumer’s preferences for food supplements containing propolis due to having a wide range of phenolic compounds to promote health. Honeybees’ used main plant source will determine propolis chemical composition thus its biological activity. Thus, determination of the propolis botanical source is highly important for its standardization and prediction of its pharmacological activity. There are two commonly applied methods to seek propolis botanical sources: chromatographic techniques and palynological analysis. In this study, high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometer (LC-MS/MS) applied comparatively with pollen analysis to propolis samples. The results of the chromatographic analyses were evaluated with principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA). Consequently, chromatographic techniques applied in this study were found to be superior to pollen analysis to identify the main plant source of propolis. Besides, HPTLC images revealed not only main botanical sources but also minor sources of propolis. Therefore, HPTLC fingerprinting combined with PCA and HCA resulted in grouping propolis samples according to geographical regions. This study may lead to pharmaceutical industries for the quality assurance of propolis while preparing standardized propolis formulations in the market with desired pharmacological properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All datas are included in the current article.

References

  1. Kuropatnicki AK, Szliszka E, Krol W (2013) Historical aspects of propolis research in modern times. Evid.-based Complement. Altern Med 2013:964149

  2. Bogdanov S, Bankova V (2017) Propolis: Origin, production, composition, The Propolis Book, Chapter 1, Bee Product Science.

  3. Popravko SA, Gurevich AI, Kolosov MN (1969) Flavonoid components of propolis. Chem Nat Compd 5(6):397–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bankova V, Popova M, Trusheva B (2006) Plant sources of propolis: an update from a chemist’s point of view. Nat Prod Commun 1(11):1023–1028

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) (2010) Scientific opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to propolis (ID 1242, 1245, 1246, 1247, 1248, 3184) and flavonoids in propolis (ID 1244, 1644, 1645, 3526, 3527, 3798, 3799) pursuant to Article 13 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. EFSA 8(10):1810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guzelmeric E, Yuksel PI, Yaman BK, Sipahi H, Celik C, Kırmızıbekmez H, Aydın A, Yesilada E (2021) Comparison of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity profiles of various chemically characterized Turkish propolis sub-types: Which propolis type is a promising source for pharmaceutical product development? J Pharm Biomed Anal 203:114196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sforcin JM, Bankova V (2011) Propolis: Is there a potential for the development of new drugs? J Ethnopharmacol 133(2):253–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fedotova VV, Konovalov DA (2019) Propolis research in Russia. Indian J Pharm Educ Res 53:500–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumazawa S, Yoneda M, Shibata I, Kanaeda J, Hamasaka T, Nakayama T (2003) Direct evidence for the plant origin of Brazilian propolis by the observation of honeybee behavior and phytochemical analysis. Chem Pharm Bull 51(6):740–742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Silva BB, Rosalen PL, Cury JA, Ikegaki M, Souza VC, Esteves A, Alencar SM (2008) Chemical composition and botanical origin of red propolis, a new type of Brazilian propolis. Evid Based Complement Altern Med 5(3):313–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumazawa S, Nakamura J, Murase M, Miyagawa M, Ahn MR, Fukumoto S (2008) Plant origin of Okinawan propolis: honeybee behavior observation and phytochemical analysis. Naturwissenschaften 95(8):781–786

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cuesta-Rubio O, Frontana-Uribe BA, Ramírez-Apan T, Cárdenas J (2002) Polyisoprenylated benzophenones in Cuban propolis; biological activity of nemorosone. Z Naturforsch C J Biosci 57(3–4):372–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tomás-Barberán FA, García-Viguera C, Vit-Olivier P, Ferreres F, Tomás-Lorente F (1993) Phytochemical evidence for the botanical origin of tropical propolis from Venezuela. Phytochem 34(1):191–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Barth OM (1998) Pollen analysis of Brazilian Propolis. Grana 37:97–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barth OM, Luz CFPD (2003) Palynological analysis of Brazilian geopropolis sediments. Grana 42(2):121–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Louveaux J, Maurizio A, Vorwohl G (1978) Methods of melissopalynology. Bee World 51(3):139–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Reich E, Schibli A (2007) High performance thin layer chromatography for the analysis of medicinal plants. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Guzelmeric E, Sipahi H, Özhan Y, Hamitoğlu M, Helvacıoğlu S, Düz G, Akyıldız IE, Kadıoğlu Yaman B, Hazar M, Dilsiz Aydın S, Aydın A, Yesilada E (2023) Comprehensive estrogenic/anti-estrogenic, anticancer, mutagenic/anti-mutagenic, and genotoxic/anti-genotoxic activity studies on chemically characterized black poplar and Eurasian aspen propolis types. J Pharm Biomed Anal 226:115241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Guzelmeric E, Özdemir D, Sen NB, Celik C, Yesilada E (2023) Quantitative determination of phenolic compounds in propolis samples from the Black Sea Region (Türkiye) based on HPTLC images using partial least squares and genetic inverse least squares methods. J Pharm Biomed Anal 229:115338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Isidorov VA, Szczepaniak L, Bakier S (2014) Rapid GC/MS determination of botanical precursors of Eurasian propolis. Food Chem 142:101–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Okińczyc P, Szumny A, Szperlik J, Kulma A, Franiczek R, Żbikowska B, Krzyżanowska B, Sroka Z (2018) Profile of polyphenolic and essential oil composition of Polish propolis, black poplar and aspens buds. Molecules 23(6):1262

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chasset T, Häbe TT, Ristivojevic P, Morlock GE (2016) Profiling and classification of French propolis by combined multivariate data analysis of planar chromatograms and scanning direct analysis in real time mass spectra. J Chromatogr A 1465:197–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Devkota HP (2022) An overview of medicinal plants of the Asteraceae family and their role in human health. In: Devkota HP, Aftab T (eds) Medicinal plants of the asteraceae family: traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacological activities. Springer, Singapore

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Kolaylı S, Birinci C, Kara Y, Ozkok A, Samancı AET, Sahin H, Yildiz O (2023) A melissopalynological and chemical characterization of Anatolian propolis and an assessment of its antioxidant potential. Eur Food Res Technol 249(5):1213–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ristivojević P, Andrić FL, Trifković JĐ, Vovk I, Stanisavljević LŽ, Tešić ŽL, Milojković-Opsenica DM (2014) Pattern recognition methods and multivariate image analysis in HPTLC fingerprinting of propolis extracts. J Chemom 28:301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pilario KE, Tielemans A, Mojica ERE (2022) Geographical discrimination of propolis using dynamic time warping kernel principal components analysis. Expert Syst Appl 187:115938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Altuntaş Ü, Güzel İ, Özçelik B (2023) Phenolic constituents, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity and clustering analysis of propolis samples based on PCA from different regions of Anatolia. Molecules 28(3):1121

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Etil Guzelmeric thanks to Özen Altıparmak (Altıparmak Food Industry and Trade Inc.) for providing laboratory facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacognosy, Yeditepe University, Kayisdagi Cad., Atasehir, 34755, Istanbul, Türkiye

    Etil Guzelmeric, Nisa Beril Sen & Erdem Yesilada

  2. Balparmak R&D Center, Altıparmak Food Industry and Trade Inc., Cavusbasi Cad., Cekmekoy, 34782, Istanbul, Türkiye

    Tuğçe Daştan & Özge Erdem

  3. Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry, İzmir Institute of Technology, 35430, İzmir, Türkiye

    Durmuş Özdemir

Authors
  1. Etil Guzelmeric
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tuğçe Daştan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nisa Beril Sen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Özge Erdem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Durmuş Özdemir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Erdem Yesilada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Etil Guzelmeric.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Compliance with ethics requirements

There is no use of human participants or animal subjects.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guzelmeric, E., Daştan, T., Sen, N.B. et al. Comparison of palynological method and chromatographic analysis combined with chemometrics to identify botanical origin of propolis. Eur Food Res Technol 250, 727–743 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-023-04420-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-023-04420-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation