Skip to main content
Log in

The Lucilia group (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae): phylogenetic and taxonomic considerations based on molecular and morphological evidence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Lucilia group sensu Anderberg and Freire comprises nine South American genera: Belloa, Berroa, Chevreulia, Cuatrecasasiella, Facelis, Gamochaetopsis, Jalcophila, Lucilia and Luciliocline. The aims of this contribution were, using DNA sequences from plastid (rpl32-trnL, trnL-F) and nuclear (ITS and ETS) markers, together with morphological characters, to test the monophyly of the Lucilia group and provide new insight into generic circumscriptions. Our studies, including a broad taxon sampling of Gnaphalieae species, suggest that the Lucilia group is paraphyletic, since Antennaria, Chionolaena, Gamochaeta, Loricaria, Micropsis, Mniodes and Stuckertiella are all nested within the Lucilia group. Morphology and molecular analyses combined showed that the traditional generic circumscription of most of the genera (e.g., Berroa, Chevreulia, Chionolaena, Cuatrecasasiella, Facelis, Jalcophila and Micropsis) correlates with the inferred phylogenetic relationships. Conversely, Lucilia and Luciliocline are non-monophyletic. Lucilia is nested in a clade with Berroa, Facelis and Micropsis. Luciliocline is strongly embedded within the clade Belloa pp + Mniodes. Our results are consistent with Dillon’s study that considered Belloa as a montotypic genus (B. chilensis). Luciliocline and the remaining species of Belloa are accommodated in the genus Mniodes, and the necessary combinations are proposed for the expanded Mniodes. All the analyses showed that the monotypic genera Stuckertiella and Gamochaetopsis are in a well-supported clade nested within Gamochaeta, which implies that taxonomic changes are required also for these genera. Internal relationships in the group and the key morphological characters used in the taxonomy of the group, as well as incongruences found between morphological and molecular analyses, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderberg AA (1991) Taxonomy and phytogeny of the tribe Gnaphalieae (Asteraceae). Opera Bot 104:1–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderberg AA, Freire SE (1990a) Luciliopsis perpusilla Wedd. is a species of Chaetanthera Ruiz and Pavon (Asteraceae). Taxon 39:430–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderberg AA, Freire SE (1990b) Jalcophila boliviensis, a new species of South American Asteraceae (Gnaphalieae). Brittonia 42:138–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderberg AA, Freire SE (1991) A cladistic and biogeographic analysis of the Lucilia group (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae). Bot J Linn Soc 106:173–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin BG, Markos S (1998) Phylogenetic utility of the external transcribed spacer (ETS) of 18S–26S rDNA: congruence of ETS and ITS trees of Calycadenia (Compositae). Molec Phylogen Evol 10:449–463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer RJ, Puttock CF, Kelchner SA (2000) Phylogeny of South African Gnaphalieae (Asteraceae) based on two noncoding chloroplast sequences. Amer J Bot 87:259–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer RJ, Greber DG, Bagnall NH (2002) Phylogeny of Australian Gnaphalieae (Asteraceae) based on four sequences, four sequences, the trnL intron, trnL/trnF intergenic spacer, matK, and ETS. Syst Bot 27:801–814

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauverd G (1913a) Contribution à l’étude des Composées 8(2). Le genre Berroa extrait des Lucilia. Bull Soc Bot Genéve 2(5):210–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauverd G (1913b) Contribution à l’étude des Composées 8(3). Le genre Facelis Cassini (emend. Beauverd). Bull Soc Bot Genève 2(5):212–220

  • Beauverd G (1913c) Contribution à l’étude des Composées 8(4). Le genre Micropsis DC. (emend. Beauverd). Bull Soc Bot Genève 2(5):221–228

  • Beauverd G (1913d) Contribution à l’étude des Composées 8(1). Le genre Stuckertiella Beauverd. Bull Soc Bot Genève 2(5):205–209

  • Bergh NG, Linder HP (2009) Cape diversification and repeated out of-southern-Africa dispersal in paper daisies (Asteraceae-Gnaphalieae). Molec Phylogen Evol 51:5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera AL (1958) El género Belloa Rémy. Bol Soc Argent Bot 7:79–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Chouksanova NA, Sveshnikova LI, Alexandrova TV (1968) Data on karyology of the family Compositae Giseke. Citologija 10:198–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuatrecasas J (1954a) Synopsis der Gattung Loricaria Wedd. Feddes Repert Spec Nov Regni Veg 56:149–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuatrecasas J (1954b) El género Mniodes. Folia Biol Andina 1:17

    Google Scholar 

  • Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2012) jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods 9:772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong DCD, Longpre EK (1963) Chromosome studies in Mexican Compositae. Rhodora 65:225–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon MO (2000) Clasification and phylogeny of the South American Gnaphalieae (Asteraceae). In: Andean Botanical Information System. http://www.sacha.org/Gnaphalieae/Gnaphalieae.htm. Accessed September 2013

  • Dillon MO (2003) New combinations in Luciliocline with notes on South American Gnaphalieae. Arnaldoa 10:45–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon MO, Sagástegui-Alva A (1985) New species and combinations in Belloa (Inuleae-Asteraceae). Phytologia 58:392–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon MO, Sagástegui-Alva A (1986) Jalcophila, a new genus of Andean Inuleae (Asteraceae). Brittonia 38:162–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon MO, Sagástegui-Alva A (1991) Tribe Inuleae. In: Macbride JF et al. (eds) Flora of Peru, Family Asteraceae: Part V. Fieldiana Bot n.s. 26:1–70

  • Dillon MO, Sagástegui-Alva A (1992) Sinopsis de los géneros de Gnaphaliinae (Asteraceae-Inuleae) de Sudamérica. Arnaldoa 1:5–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Dickson EE (1987) Preservation of plant samples for DNA restriction endonuclease analysis. Taxon 36:715–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris JS, Albert VA, Källersjö M, Lipscomb D, Kluge AG (1996) Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12:99–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández Casas J, Fernández Piqueras J (1981) Estudio cariológico de algunas plantas bolivianas. Anales Jard Bot Madrid 38:149–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire SE (1986a) Novenia: Nuevo género de Inuleae (Compositae). Bol Soc Argent Bot 24:295–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire SE (1986b) Revisión del género Lucilia (Compositae, Inuleae). Darwiniana 27:431–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire SE (1986c) Números cromosómicos en el género Lucilia (Compositae, Inuleae). Bol Soc Argent Bot 24:411–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire SE (1987) Nuevos sinónimos y una nueva combinación en el género Lucilia (Compositae, Inuleae). Darwiniana 28:409–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire SE (1989) Oligandra Less. is Lucilia Cass. (Compositae, Inuleae). Taxon 38:298–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire SE (1993) A revision of Chionolaena (Compositae, Gnaphalieae). Ann Missouri Bot Gard 80:397–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire SE, Iharlegui L (1997) Sinopsis preliminar del género Gamochaeta (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae). Bol Soc Argent Bot 33:23–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbany-Casals M, Andres-Sanchez S, Garcia-Jacas N, Susanna A, Rico E, Martinez-Ortega MM (2010) How many of Cassini anagrams should there be? Molecular systematics and phylogenetic relationships in the Filago group (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae), with special focus on the genus Filago. Taxon 59:671–1689

    Google Scholar 

  • Goloboff PA, Farris JS, Källersjö M, Oxelman B, Ramírez MI, Szumik CA (2003) Improvements to resampling measures of group support. Cladistics 19:324–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goloboff PA, Farris JS, Nixon K (2008) TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24:774–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52:696–704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hind DJN (2011) An annotated preliminary checklist of the Compositae of Bolivia, version 2. http://www.kew.org/science/tropamerica/boliviacompositae and http://www.kew.org/science/tropamerica/boliviacompositae/checklist.pdf. Accessed 7 March 2014

  • Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jörgensen CA, Sørensen TH, Westergaard M (1958) The flowering plants of Greenland. A taxonomical and cytological survey. Biol Skr Vidensk Selskab 9(4):1–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Juel HO (1900) Vergleichende Untersuchungen uber typische und parthenogenetische Fort-pflanzung bei der Gattung Antennaria. Kg Svenska Vet Ak Handl 33(5):1–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K-I, Miyata T (2002) MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30:3059–3066

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis PO (2001) A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst Biol 50:913–925

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loeuille B, Deble L, Nakajima JN (2011) Four new species of Chionolaena (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae) from south-eastern Brazil. Kew Bull 66:263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löve A, Löve D (1982a) IOPB chromosome number reports 75. Taxon 31:344–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Löve A, Löve D (1982b) IOPB chromosome number reports 77. Taxon 31:766–768

    Google Scholar 

  • Merxmüller H, Leins P, Roessler H (1977) Inuleae-systematic review. In: Heywood VH, Harborne JB, Turner BL (eds) The biology and chemistry of the Compositae. Academic Press, London, pp 577–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore DM (1981) Chromosome numbers of Fuegian angiosperms. Bol Soc Brot 53:995–1012

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom GL (1990a) Taxonomic status of Gamochaeta (Asteraceae: Inuleae) and the species of the United States. Phytologia 68:186–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom GL (1990b) An additional species of Gnaphaliothamnus (Asteraceae: Inuleae) and further evidence for the integrity of the genus. Phytologia 69(1):1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom GL (1990c) Taxonomy of Gnaphaliothamnus (Asteraceae: Inuleae). Phytologia 68(5):366–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesom GL (2001) New combinations in Chionolaena (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae). Sida 19:849–852

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon KC, Carpenter JM (1996) On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12:221–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packer JG, McPherson GD (1974) Chromosome numbers in some vascular plants from northern Alaska. Can J Bot 52:1095–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rémy EJ (1847) Compuestas, Belloa. In: Gay C (ed) Historia física y política de Chile, Botánica 3(3). En casa del autor, Paris, pp 336–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson H (1985) In honor of the botanical career of José Cuatrecasas. In: Flora Neotropica, 2 Supplement. Brunelliaceae. pp 13–16

  • Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw J, Lickey EB, Schilling EE, Small RL (2007) Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare III. Amer J Bot 94:275–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smissen RD, Galbany-Casals M, Breitwieser I (2011) Ancient allopolyploidy in the everlasting daisies (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae): complex relationships among extant clades. Taxon 60:649–662

    Google Scholar 

  • Spooner DM, De Jong DCD, Sun BY, Stuessy TF, Gengler KM, Nesom GL, Berry PE (1995) Chromosome counts of Compositae from Ecuador and Venezuela. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 82:596–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J (1991) Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Pl Molec Biol 17:105–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL, Powell AM, Cuatrecasas J (1967) Chromosome numbers in Compositae. XI Peruvian species. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 54:172–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbanska-Worytkiewicz K (1967) Cytological Investigations in Antennaria Gaertn. from North Scandinavia. Acta Boreal, A 22:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward J, Bayer RJ, Breitwieser I, Smissen R, Galbany-Casals M, Unwin M (2009) Gnaphalieae. In: Funk VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Bayer RJ (eds) Systematics, Evolution, and Biogeography of Compositae. International Association for Plant Taxonomy, Vienna, pp 539–588

    Google Scholar 

  • White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Shinsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 315–322

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilgenbusch JC, Warren DL, Swofford DL (2004) AWTY: a system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetic inference. http://ceb.csit.fsu.edu/awty. Accessed 2 November 2013

Download references

Acknowledgments

We give special thanks to reviewers for critical reading of the manuscript. The authors are grateful to Cecilia Ezcurra (BCRU), Néstor Bayón (LPAG), Andreas Tribsch (SZU), and Juan C. Ospina (SI) for providing us materials of Belloa chilensis, Gamochaetopsis alpina, Gnaphalium uliginosum, and Loricaria colombiana, respectively. We also appreciate the help of the curator of the herbaria BCRU, BHCB, CONC, LP, LPAG, LPB, SZU, MO, SI, SPF for permitting access to their collections. Thanks are due to Jorge A. Hurst for some DNA extractions. Also thanks to Fernando O. Zuloaga, Mauricio Bonifacino, Marcelo Baeza, Juan C. Ospina, and Néstor Bayón, for permission to use their photographs included in Figs. 4 and 5. The research and fieldwork to NW Argentina and Northern Bolivia were supported by the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina (PIP 112-200801-02196).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susana E. Freire.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 57 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOC 29 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Freire, S.E., Chemisquy, M.A., Anderberg, A.A. et al. The Lucilia group (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae): phylogenetic and taxonomic considerations based on molecular and morphological evidence. Plant Syst Evol 301, 1227–1248 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-014-1147-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-014-1147-0

Keywords

Navigation