Skip to main content
Log in

Unexpected species diversity and contrasting evolutionary hypotheses in Hebeloma (Agaricales) sections Sinapizantia and Velutipes in Europe

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mycological Progress Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hebeloma velutipes is one of the most common and abundant members of the ectomycorrhizal basidiomycete genus and H. sinapizans is one of its oldest and most commonly recorded species. Using large sample sizes, several loci and the analysis of types, we explored the taxonomy, species limits, distribution and the infrageneric classification of these two species and their relatives. By relying almost exclusively on sequenced material, we were able to attain a marked refinement of species descriptions. Phylogenetic results are congruent with respect to the delimitation of species, but suggest conflicting evolutionary histories of the species phylogeny. Using multi-species coalescent analysis, phylogenetic support for H. sects. Velutipes and Sinapizantia was assessed, finding clear support for H. sect. Sinapizantia but ambiguous results for H. sect. Velutipes. One species, H. subconcolor, previously accommodated in H. sect. Denudata, is placed in H. sect. Velutipes. Hebeloma bulbiferum, so far not considered in systematic treatments, is shown to belong to H. sect. Sinapizantia. Unexpectedly, H. velutipes turned out to be distinct from H. leucosarx. Hebeloma erebium comb. nov., H. celatum sp. nov. and H. quercetorum, formerly treated as a single species (H. quercetorum), are demonstrated to be three taxa that are clearly distinct in molecular terms, even though, morphologically, they can be deceptively similar; H. erebium and H. quercetorum are, moreover, geographically distinct. The morphological characters used to distinguish the ten recognised European species are outlined. Finally, a lectotype and an epitype are designated for H. sinapizans and a lectotype for H. quercetorum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aanen DK, Kuyper TW (1999) Intercompatibility tests in the Hebeloma crustuliniforme complex in northwestern Europe. Mycologia 91:783–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aanen DK, Kuyper TW (2004) A comparison of the application of a biological and phenetic species concept in the Hebeloma crustuliniforme complex within a phylogenetic framework. Persoonia 18:285–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Aanen DK, Kuyper TW, Boekhout T, Hoekstra RF (2000) Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Hebeloma based on ITS1 and 2 sequences, with special emphasis on the Hebeloma crustuliniforme complex. Mycologia 92:269–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aanen DK, Kuyper TW, Hoekstra RF (2001) A widely distributed ITS polymorphism within a biological species of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Hebeloma velutipes. Mycol Res 105:284–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boekhout T (1982) De sekties Denudata (Fr.) Sacc. en Anthracophila Boekhout nom. prov. van het geslacht Hebeloma (Fr.) Kummer in Nederland en aangrenzende gebieden. Dissertation, Rijksherbarium, Leiden

  • Bon M (1986) Novitates. Validations et taxons nouveaux. Doc Mycol 17:51–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchsenius F (2009) FastGap version 1.2. Department of Biosciences, Aarhus University, Denmark. Home page at: http://www.aubot.dk/FastGap_home.htm

  • Bouckaert RR, Heled J (2014) DensiTree 2: seeing trees through the forest. doi:10.1101/012401

  • Bouckaert R, Heled J, Kühnert D, Vaughan T, Wu C-H, Xie D, Suchard MA, Rambaut A, Drummond AJ (2014) BEAST 2: a software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput Biol 10(4), e1003537. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003537

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle H, Zimdars B, Renker C, Buscot F (2006) A molecular phylogeny of Hebeloma species from Europe. Mycol Res 110:369–380. doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2005.11.015

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruchet G (1970) Contribution à l’étude du genre Hebeloma (Fr.) Kumm. Bull Mens Soc Linn Lyon 6:1–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt U (2012) Methods for DNA barcoding of fungi. Methods Mol Biol 858:183–205. doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-591-6_9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt U, Beker HJ, Vesterholt J, Dukik K, Walther G, Vila J, Fernández Brime S (2013) European species of Hebeloma section Theobromina. Fungal Divers 58:103–126. doi:10.1007/s13225-012-0188-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt U, Beker HJ, Vesterholt J (2015a) Decrypting the Hebeloma crustuliniforme complex: European species of Hebeloma section Denudata subsection Denudata (Agaricales). Persoonia 35:101–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt U, Ronikier A, Schütz N, Beker HJ (2015b) The genus Hebeloma in the alpine belt of the Carpathians including two new species. Mycologia, preliminary version published online: September 9th. doi:10.3852/15-097

  • Favre J (1960) Catalogue descriptif des champignons supérieurs de la zone subalpine du Parc National Suisse. Soc Helv Sci Nat 6:323–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Flot J-F (2010) SeqPHASE: a web tool for interconverting PHASE input/output files and FASTA sequence alignments. Mol Ecol Resour 10:162–166. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02732.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flot J-F, Tillier A, Samadi S, Tillier S (2006) Phase determination from direct sequencing of length-variable DNA regions. Mol Ecol Notes 6:627–630. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01355.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fries EM (1838) Epicrisis Systematis Mycologici seu Synopsis Hymenomycetum. Typographia Academica, Uppsala, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez P, Labarère J (1998) Sequence and secondary structure of the mitochondrial small-subunit rRNA V4, V6, and V9 domains reveal highly species-specific variations within the genus Agrocybe. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:4149–4160

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Grilli E (2004) Type studies in Hebeloma. On Hebeloma bulbiferum and H. colossus. Micol Veg Medit 12:83–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Grilli E (2005) Studies on the genus Hebeloma, Hebeloma megacarpum A.H. Smith ex Grilli sp. nov. Beitr Kenntn Pilze Mitteleurop 14:81–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Grilli E (2007) Type studies in Hebeloma. Unravelling a taxonomic-nomenclatural tangle: what is Hebeloma leucosarx? Micol Veg Medit 22:133–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Grilli E (2008) Type studies in Hebeloma. On some little known North American species described by F.S. Earle and W.A. Murrill. Micol Veg Medit 23:83–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Grilli E (2009a) Revisione del genere Hebeloma. In: Maire J-C, Moreau P-A, Robich G (eds) Compléments à la Flore des champignons supérieurs du Maroc de G. Malençon et R. Bertault. Confédération Européenne de Mycologie Méditerranéenne (CEMM), Nice, pp. 299–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Grilli E (2009b) Type studies in Hebeloma. On Hebeloma longicaudum and H. claviceps, two highly critical taxa. Micol Veg Medit 24:137–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Grilli E, Parra LA, Beker HJ, Eberhardt U (2015) Some nomenclatural and taxonomic considerations on Agaricus subtestaceus Batsch 1789 and A. testaceus Fr. 1838. Boll Assoc Micol Ecol Romana 94:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Gröger F (1987) Wurzelnde Hebeloma-Arten. Z Mykol 53:49–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann P (1983) Clé de détermination de Micropsalliota (Agaricaceae) et description de deux espèces nouvelles. Bull du Jardin Bot Nat de Belgique 53:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heled J, Drummond AJ (2010) Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol Biol Evol 27:570–580. doi:10.1093/molbev/msp274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hesler LR (1977) New species of Hebeloma. Kew Bull 31:471–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huijsman HSC (1977) A new species of Naucoria. Kew Bull 31:585–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamoni PG (1993) Funghi ad alta quota in Valsesia (8° contributo). Funghi Amb 62–63:61–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30:772–780. doi:10.1093/molbev/mst010

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T (2005) MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res 33:511–518. doi:10.1093/nar/gki198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kauff F, Lutzoni F (2002) Phylogeny of the Gyalectales and Ostropales (Ascomycota, Fungi): among and within order relationships based on nuclear ribosomal RNA small and large subunits. Mol Phylogenet Evol 25:138–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kühner R, Lamoure D (1986) Catalogue des Agaricales de la zone alpine du Parc National de la Vanoise et des régions limitrophes. Trav Sci Parc Natl Vanoise 15:103–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühner R, Romagnesi H (1953) Flore analytique des champignons supérieurs. Masson et Cie, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SYW, Guindon S (2012) PartitionFinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol Biol Evol 29:1695–1701. doi:10.1093/molbev/mss020

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen GA, Ammirati JF (1982) The FISAM in retrospect. In: Laursen GA, Ammirati JF (eds) Arctic and alpine mycology. University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, pp 532–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmeisse R, Gryta H, Jargeat P, Fraisinet-Tachet L, Gay G, Debaud JC (1999) Hebeloma. In: Cairney JWG, Chambers SM (eds) Ectomycorrhizal fungi: key genera in profile. Springer, Berlin, pp 89–127

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Matheny PB, Curtis JM, Hofstetter V, Aime MC, Moncalvo JM, Ge ZW, Yang ZL, Slot JC, Ammirati JF, Baroni TJ, Bougher NL, Hughes KW, Lodge DJ, Kerrigan RW, Seidl MT, Aanen DK, DeNitis M, Daniele GM, Desjardin DE, Kropp BE, Norvell LL, Parker A, Vellinga EC, Vilaglys R, Hibbett DS (2006) Major clades of Agaricales: a multilocus phylogenetic overview. Mycologia 98:982–995. doi:10.3852/mycologia.98.6.982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill J, Barrie FR, Buck WR, Demoulin V, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, Herendeen PS, Knapp S, Marhold K, Prado J, Prud’homme van Reine WF, Smith GF, Wiersema JH, Turland NJ (2012) International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code): adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011. Regnum Vegetabile 154. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein. Available online at: http://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/main.php

  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. in: Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), New Orleans, LA, pp 1–8

  • Moncalvo J-M, Vilgalys R, Redhead SA, Johnson JE, James TY, Aime MC, Hofstetter V, Verduin SJW, Larsson E, Baroni TJ, Thorn RG, Jacobsson S, Clémençon H, Miller OK Jr (2002) One hundred and seventeen clades of euagarics. Mol Phylogenet Evol 23:357–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moreau P-A (2005) A nomenclatural revision of the genus Alnicola (Cortinariaceae). Fungal Divers 20:121–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Parra LA, Beker H, Grilli E, Eberhardt U, Hawksworth DL (2015) (16–18) Proposals to add the unpaginated index of Traité des Champignons and two editions of Tabula plantarum fungosarum by J.-J. Paulet to the list of “Suppressed Works” (ICN App. VI). Taxon 64:644–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulet J-J (1793) Traité des champignons, ouvrage dans lequel, on trouve après l’histoire analytique & chronologique des découvertes & des travaux sur ces plantes, vol 2. Biodiversity Heritage library. Available online at: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/5417#/summary

  • Paulet J-J (1808–1835) Iconographie des champignons. J.B. Baillière, Paris

  • Quadraccia L (1984) Novitates—combinaisons et taxons nouveaux. Doc Mycol 14:27–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Quadraccia L (1988) Ricerche su Hebeloma (Agaricales, Cortinariaceae). II. Validazione di Hebeloma remyi ed H. stenocystis e due nuove combinazioni. Mycol Helv 3:191–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Quadraccia L (1993) Research on Hebeloma (Agaricales, Cortinariaceae). III: three new species from the Italian middle Tyrrhenian slope. Mycotaxon 49:279–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambaut A (2012) FigTree. Tree figure drawing tool version 1.4.0. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh. Home page at: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/

  • Romagnesi H (1983) Études sur le genre Hebeloma. II. Sydowia 36:255–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Roux P (2006) Mille et un champignons. Édition Roux, Sainte-Sigolène

    Google Scholar 

  • Saccardo PA (1887) Sylloge fungorum V. Friedlander & Sohn, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons MP, Ochoterena H (2000) Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst Biol 49:369–381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singer R (1962) The Agaricales in modern taxonomy, 2nd edn. J. Cramer, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer R (1975) The Agaricales in modern taxonomy, 3rd edn. J. Cramer, Vaduz

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer R (1986) The Agaricales in modern taxonomy, 4th edn. Sven Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AH (1984) Studies of species of Hebeloma (Fr.) Kummer from the great lakes region of North America I. Sydowia 37:271–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamatakis A (2014) RAxML Version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312–1313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Suchard MA, Rambaut A (2009) Many-core algorithms for statistical phylogenetics. Bioinformatics 25:1370–1376. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL (2002) PAUP* 4.0: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts

  • Vaidya G, Lohman DJ, Meier R (2011) SequenceMatrix: concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics 27:171–180. doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00329.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesterholt J (2004) The identity of Hebeloma fastibile, the type species of Hebeloma. Ann Micol AGMT 1(53–63):125–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesterholt J (2005) The genus Hebeloma, vol 3. Fungi of Northern Europe. Svampetryk, Tilst

  • Vesterholt J (2008) Hebeloma (Fr.) P. Kumm. In: Knudsen H, Vesterholt J (eds) Funga Nordica. Nordsvamp, Copenhagen, pp 804–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesterholt J, Eberhardt U, Beker HJ (2014) Epitypification of Hebeloma crustuliniforme. Mycol Prog 13:553–562. doi:10.1007/s11557-013-0938-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are very much obliged to A. Bogaerts from the herbarium in Meise (BR) and G. Lalli (AQUI) for handling loans. Our grateful thanks also go to Th.W. Kuyper for kindly making available to us material used by D.K. Aanen from WBS now L, as well as the curators of the herbaria BR, C, E, G, K, IB, L, LIP, LY, MCVE, MICH, MPU, PC, RO, SOMF, TUR, WU and ZT for the loan of collections for study and sequencing. Furthermore, we very much appreciated the help of A. Andrews, P. Ardron, B. Assyov, I. Assyova, L. Ballester, E. Bizio, J. Borovička, A. Bracke, B. Brand, E. Campo, A. Cappelli, M. Carbone, G. Corriol, P. Cullington, L. Davies, D. Deschuyteneer, E. Egli, F. Draye, A. Gennari, M. Ghyselinck, A. Hausknecht, J. Heilmann-Clausen, A. Henrici, P. Hilb, C. Hobart, S. Huhtinen, L. Jalink, I. Kałucka, M.Karadelev, D. Karansinski, S. Kelly, G. Kibby, D. Laber, C. Lecuru, M. Lenne, B. Levesen, M. Lozides, J.P. Marice, M. Meusers, G. Mir, P.-A. Moreau, S. Poumarat, I. Salcedo, J.C. Schou, S. Pizzardo, S. Skeates, A. Szczepkouski, M. Tassi, A. Taylor, M. Theiss, T. Tokov, M. Tortelli, J. Vauras, J. Volders, R. Watling and J. Weir for supplying us with interesting Hebeloma collections. G. Pacioni of the Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Italy, is thanked for the use of sequencing facilities. Numerous people have helped in the lab to generate Hebeloma sequence data that were used directly or indirectly in this study. We would like to thank K. Dukik (CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre Utrecht), U. Fürst, S. Garnica and J. Schade (Universität Tübingen), and R. Gadjieva, M. Jonsson, C. Lundström, J. Petterson and D. Öncü (SLU Uppsala), as well as the Uppsala University Genome Center, the Hubrecht Institute sequence facility and LGC. Special thanks go to P.-A. Moreau for suggesting that Naucoria erebia might be a Hebeloma. Finally, we are indebted to Luis Parra Sanchez and David Hawksworth for their invaluable help in solving several knotty nomenclatural problems posed by some of the taxa treated in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ursula Eberhardt.

Additional information

Section Editor: Zhu-Liang Yang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grilli, E., Beker, H.J., Eberhardt, U. et al. Unexpected species diversity and contrasting evolutionary hypotheses in Hebeloma (Agaricales) sections Sinapizantia and Velutipes in Europe. Mycol Progress 15, 5 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-015-1148-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-015-1148-6

Keywords

Navigation