Skip to main content
Log in

A three-gene phylogeny supports taxonomic rearrangements in the family Didymiaceae (Myxomycetes)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mycological Progress Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Myxomycetes, or plasmodial slime molds, are a monophyletic group of amoeboid protists whose classification is based mainly on morphological features of fruiting bodies. Although published phylogenies based on one or two genetic markers have clarified the boundaries of the main order-level systematic groups, the position and composition of some families and genera of myxomycetes are still a topic for discussion. In this study, we reconstructed the phylogeny of the family Didymiaceae based on three independent genetic markers: the 18S rDNA gene, the translation elongation factor 1-alpha, and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene. Maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference phylogenetic analyses produced congruent topologies and showed that of the five major genera of the family, only species of the genus Diachea form a monophyletic clade, while the other four genera are clearly para- or polyphyletic. Species of the genus Didymium form a monophyletic clade with the only species of the genus Mucilago. The polymorphic species Lepidoderma tigrinum is clearly placed among 13 species of Diderma, including the type species of the genus. All other studied species of Lepidoderma form a separate clade together with Diderma fallax. We thus extend the latest nomenclatural revisions by disbanding the genera Mucilago and Lepidoderma, whereby the single species of Mucilago is transferred to the genus Didymium and L. tigrinum to Diderma. Extended taxon sampling allows the transfer of more nivicolous species of the former genus Lepidoderma to Polyschismium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The DNA sequences generated during the current study are available in NCBI Genbank. The list of material used in the phylogenetic reconstruction, the concatenated alignment, partition file, and phylogenetic tree in the Newick format have been submitted as supplementary material and can also be found in FigShare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21342834).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the use of equipment of the Core Facility Center “Cell and Molecular Technologies in Plant Science” at the Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (BIN RAS, St. Petersburg) and send personal thanks to Lyudmila Kartzeva and Elena Krapivskaya (lead engineers of the Core Facility Center). The authors are grateful to Marianne Meyer, Marja Pennanen and the staff of the Botanic Garden Meise (BR) for providing specimens and to Dr. F. J. Rejos, curator of the University of Alcalá Herbarium (AH), for his assistance with some specimens examined in the current study.

Funding

The molecular lab work of Ilya S. Prikhodko, Oleg. N. Shchepin, Nadezhda A. Bortnikova and Yuri K. Novozhilov was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project No. 22-24-00747).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ilya S. Prikhodko, Yuri K. Novozhilov, and Oleg N. Shchepin contributed to the study conception and design. All authors participated in the collection of herbarium specimens for morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses. Light and scanning electron microscopy was performed by Yuri K. Novozhilov, Vladimir I. Gmoshinskiy, Gabriel Moreno, and Ángela López-Villalba. Ilya S. Prikhodko, Oleg N. Shchepin, and Nadezhda A. Bortnikova were responsible for DNA extraction, PCR analysis, and sequencing. Ilya S. Prikhodko and Oleg N. Shchepin performed phylogenetic analyses. Ilya S. Prikhodko and Vladimir I. Gmoshinskiy prepared illustrations on the phylogeny and morphology of the studied material, respectively. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Ilya S. Prikhodko, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilya S. Prikhodko.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Section Editor: Tanay Bose

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(XLSX 48 kb)

ESM 2

(FA 636 kb)

ESM 3

(TXT 65 bytes)

ESM 4

(NWC 15 kb)

ESM 5

(JPG 10904 kb)

ESM 6

(JPG 14941 kb)

ESM 7

(DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prikhodko, I.S., Shchepin, O.N., Bortnikova, N.A. et al. A three-gene phylogeny supports taxonomic rearrangements in the family Didymiaceae (Myxomycetes). Mycol Progress 22, 11 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-022-01858-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-022-01858-1

Keywords

Navigation