Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of seed-borne fungi in summer (Cucurbita pepo) and winter (Cucurbita moschata) pumpkins of Turkey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study used seeds from five different summer pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) cultivars (Çağlayan, Mert Bey, Sena Hanım, TG22, and TG38) and seeds collected from fruits in ten different provinces in Turkey where winter pumpkins (Cucurbita moschata Duch.) were cultivated. The seed coat and embryo were cultured and the seed-borne fungi were identified. Allophoma labilis and Didymella americana were detected in seeds (seed coat and embryo) of the cvs. Çağlayan and Mert Bey only, respectively. The seeds of both summer and winter pumpkins were contaminated with Alternaria alternata, Fusarium equiseti and Fusarium proliferatum, though their incidence varied depending on cultivar, province and seed parts. All species caused root and crown rot in seedlings in pathogenicity tests. Disease severities were caused by A. labilis, A. alternata, D. americana, F. equiseti and F. proliferatum at rates of 37.14–49.64%, 31.78%-42.50%, 31.29%, 14.17–50.00% and 25.14–51.07%, respectively. Colonial growth on different media, morphological and molecular characterization of the most pathogenic isolates from each species were defined. This is the first report in Turkey of A. labilis and D. americana in seeds of C. pepo, and Alternaria alternata, F. equiseti and F. proliferatum in seeds of both C. pepo and C. moschata, as well as the first pathogenicity record for these species by seed inoculation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Trakya Agricultural Research Institute (Edirne/Turkey) and AYFA Tarım Limited Company (Bursa/Turkey) for kindly providing the cultivars. They are also grateful to Martha Rowe (University of Nebraska-Lincoln) and anonymous reviewers of our manuscript for improving the language and for useful remarks.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The article was prepared from the Master’s degree thesis of ED who designed the study, carried out the experiments and wrote the original draft. NO analysed the data statistically and helped in reviewing of the final draft. HB performed molecular characterization of fungal species. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuray Özer.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 623 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demir, E., Özer, N. & Bayraktar, H. Identification of seed-borne fungi in summer (Cucurbita pepo) and winter (Cucurbita moschata) pumpkins of Turkey. J Plant Pathol 105, 1087–1101 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-023-01451-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-023-01451-9

Keywords

Navigation