Skip to main content

History and Current Importance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Beta maritima

Abstract

The ancestors of Beta maritima were known from prehistory. After domestication, beet became more important not only for food and drug source, but also as sugar (sucrose) producer. The cultivation for leaves and root to be used as vegetable or cattle feed retains its economic value. Beta maritima was described by several authors, becoming in the last century crucial as source of traits disappeared in the beet crops after domestication. The research has led to important results, especially in the field of resistance to severe diseases. An increasing numbers of publications are dedicated to Beta maritima because it fits well into studies concerning breeding in general, population genetics, natural selection, colonization, speciation, gene flow, transgenes pollution, and so on. The discovery of new useful qualities in the wild germplasm is expected by the application of molecular biology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Beta maritima, now classified Beta vulgaris L. subsp. maritima (L.) Arcang, is called for the sake of brevity “Beta maritima” or “sea beet”.

  2. 2.

    Feral beets originate by a “dedomestication” of the crop. The process starts with the early flowering (bolting) of some cultivated beets before harvest.

  3. 3.

    The graffiti refers to the vulgar origin of the man, likely “nouveau riche”, alluding to the digestive consequences of consuming the mentioned vegetables Funari (1998).

  4. 4.

    The correct Latin adjective first used by Pliny is “silvestris“, and not “sylvestris” as was written by later authors.

  5. 5.

    The books describing the medicinal applications of plants are named “herbaria” or “dynamidia” whether they include or not drawings of the plants (Piccoli 2000). The use of dynamidia seems to date back to the Chinese, Assyrian-Babylonian, and Egyptian medicine. The “Pents’ao” was written in China around sixteenth century BC (Pezzella 1993). The “Papyrus of Luxor” dated 1550 BC was essentially a list of medical properties of plants (Pezzella 2007). Further examples are given by the Herbaria attributed to Crateuas and Apuleius: at least one copy of the latter was employed in the abbeys. In the Middle Age, the herbaria become banal reproductions of ancient manuscripts (Lazzarini et al. 2004). Many transcriptions made by copyists not involved in botany lead to a considerable increase of mistakes in texts and illustrations (Weitzmann 1979). The drawings became very formal and simple, sometimes with complete bilateral symmetry and often included only for embellish the manuscript (Arber 1912). Therefore, the identification of the represented or described plants became quite impossible. The language was a mixture of Latin, vulgar, common, and foreign terms frequently difficult to translate, as the names given to the plants. In the manuscripts, the name of the author was often omitted as the references regarding the hand written book (Gasparrini-Leporace et al. 1952). Only toward the end of the thirteenth century, when it was necessary to print the most important manuscripts, they began to check the names and the correspondence with the reality of descriptions and illustrations. The first printed herbaria were also named “Book of Nature” from the “Půch der Natur” written likely by Konrad von Megenberg (1348?) and published around 1470.

  6. 6.

    Simplices” were called medical substances extracted from various sources and used without any further processing. Those mixed or treated were called “compositae”. The first category of drugs is currently called “Galenic” as well; the second “Hippocratic” in agreement on the respective authors. A very useful list of the simplices at the time available in the pharmacies of Ferrara, Italy, is given by Musa Brassavola (1537). The medical substances are divided into herbs (including Beta nigra and alba), seeds, fruits, roots, barks, gums, metals, soils, salts, oils from flowers, oils from mine, and so on. The last ones are named “petroleum et asphaltum” as well. At the end of the treatise, as for the modern drugs, are written the applications and the warnings which can be paid before using. The “Hortus simpliciorum” or “Hortus sanitatis”, and so on (Garden of simple drugs or Garden of health) were the ancestors of the current “Hortus botanicus” (Botanical garden), where a number of plants are grown and studied. According to Schulters (1817), the first Hortus arose in Padua, Italy (1533)

  7. 7.

    The manuscripts are books written by hand on different substrates (papyrus, animal skin, parchment, handmade paper, etc.). Given the reproduction system and the very high costs, the spread was limited to the libraries of monasteries, universities, royal courts, etc. Incunabula are called the books produced by the invention of printing (1455) until around the middle fourteenth century. These printed books distinguished by preserving the setting of the old manuscripts, which were often loose-pages, with any title, page number, index, and with any indication about the author or subsequently of the printer. Thanks to the increased share and the lowering costs, the printed books took gradually a set-up similar to the modern publications. The first incunabulum was the Latin version of the Holy Bible printed around 1455 by Gutenberg. The Pliny’s “Historia Naturalis” was printed in 1478, whereas the Dioscorides “Materia medica” was the first printed book regarding medicine and botany (Gray 1821). Tacuina sanitatis were illustrated books containing popular therapeutic remedies, taken in part from the Arabic literature, at the time considered most effective and innovative than the traditional Greek-Roman medicine. The term “tacuinum” derives from the Arabic “Taqwin al sihha” (Tables of health). Reworked and translated into Latin around 1200, these booklets began to spread in Tuscany and Lombardy, Italy. Because this sort of manuals was intended mainly to the aristocracy, the manuscripts were embellished with precious decorations and miniatures. In addition to plant drawings, scenes from daily life were illustrated with great richness of details. Unlike herbaria, descriptions of the plants were summarized in few lines each illustration (Fig. 5.2).

  8. 8.

    In Fig. 1.19, it is still possible to see salt crystals on every part of the plant.

References

  • Achard FC (1803) Anleitung zum Anbau der zur Zuckerfabrication anwendbaren Runkelrüben und zur vortheilhaften Gewinnung des Zuckers aus denselben. Reprinted in: Ostwald’s Klassiker der exacten Wissenschaft (1907) Engelmann, Lipsia, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Allard RW (1960) Principles of plant breeding. Wiley, Hoboken NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson FJ (1977) An illustrated history of the herbals. Columbia Univ. Press, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonimous (1852) Book for the sea-side. Religion Treet Society, London UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Arber AR (1912) Herbals, their origin and evolution. History of botany. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 1470–1670

    Google Scholar 

  • Auer CA (2003) Tracking genes from seed to supermarket. Trends Plant Sci 8:531–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Avagyan A (2008) Crop wild relatives in Armenia: diversity, legislation, and conservation issues. In: Maxed M, Ford-Lloyd BV, Kell SP, Iriondo JM, Dulloo ME, Turok J (eds) Crop wild relative conservation and use. CAB International, Cambridge MA, USA, pp 58–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbaro H (1494) Castigationes Plinianae. Pomponius Melam, Venice, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch D, Brand U (1998) Saline soil condition decreases rhizomania infection of Beta vulgaris. J Plant Pathol 80:219–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch D, Cuguen J, Biancardi E, Sweet J (2003) Environmental implications of gene flow from sugar beet to wild beet–current status and future research needs. Environ Biosafety Res 2:105–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch D, Lehnen M, Clegg J, Pohl-Orf M, Schuphan I, Ellstrand NC (1999) Impact of gene flow from cultivated beet on genetic diversity of wild sea beet populations. Mol Ecol 8:1733–1741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson W (1902) Mendel’s principles of heredity. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bauhin G (1623) Pinax theatri botanici … etc. Basel, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauhin H (1731) Kräuter Buch. Jacobus Theodorus, Basel, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter W (1837) British phaenerogamous botany. Parker, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker-Dillingen J (1928) Die Wurzelfrüchte (Rüben). In: Parey P (ed) Handbuch des Hackfruchtbaues und Handelapflanzbaues. Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Berti-Pichat C (1866) Corso teorico e pratico di agricoltura. Unione Tipografico-Editrice, Torino, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Biancardi E, Campbell LG, Skaracis GN, de Biaggi M (eds) (2005) Genetics and breeding of sugar beet. Science Publishers, Enfield NH, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Biancardi E, de Biaggi M (1979) Beta martima L. in the Po Delta. In: ISCI (ed) Proc Convegno Tecnico Internazionale in Commemorazione di Ottavio Munerati. Rovigo, Italy, pp 183–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Biancardi E, Lewellen RT, de Biaggi M, Erichsen AW, Stevanato P (2002) The origin of rhizomania resistance in sugar beet. Euphytica 127:383–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biancardi E, McGrath JM, Panella LW, Lewellen RT, Stevanato P (2010) Sugar Beet. In: Bradshaw JE (ed) Root and tuber crops. Springer Science+Bussiness Media, LLC, New York, pp 173–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell E (1765) Sammlung der Gewachse. de Launoy, Nürnberg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock H (1552) De stirpium maxime earum quae in Germania … etc. Manuscript

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock H (1560) Kreuter Buch. Gedrucht zu Strassburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Bois D (1927) Les plantes alimentaires chez tous les peuples et a travers les ages. France, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottema S (2010) Pollen profile of sediment core Agköl Adabag, Turkey and Lake Urmia (Iran). European Pollen Database. https://doi.org/10.1594/pangaea.738949-doi:10.1594/pangaea.739926

  • Brotero FA (1804) Flora Lusitanica. Ex Typographia Regia, Lisbona, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhnfels O (1534) In hoc volumine contenitur insignium medicorum etc. Strasbourg, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschan G (1895) Vorgeschichtliche Botanik der Cultur-und Nutzpflanzen der alten Welt auf Grund prähistorischer Funde. Kern, Breslau, Germany

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell GKG, Russell GE (1964) Breeding in sugar beet. Ann Rept Plant Breed Inst Cambridge 1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AWF (1967) Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Am J Hum Genet 19:233–257

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chabray D (1666) Stirpium sciatigraphia et icones ex musaeo Dominici Chabraei. Colonia, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciarallo C (2004) Flora pompeiana. Erma di Bretschneider, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng D, Yoshida Yu, Kitazaki K, Negoro S, Takahashi H, Xu D, Mikkami T, Kubo T (2011) Mitocondrial genome diversity in Beta vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris (Leaf and Garden Beet Groups) and its implications concerning the dissemination of the crop. Genet Resour Crop Evol 58:553–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coakley L (1787) An account of the culture and use of the mangel wurzel or root scarcity. 4th edn. Charles Dilly, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles W (1657) Adam in Eden or natures paradise. Printed by F Streater, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins M (2000) Medioeval herbals, the illustrative traditon. British Library and Univ Toronto Press, London, UK and Toronto, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Coons GH (1954) The wild species of Beta. Ibidem 8:142–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalby A (2003) Food in the ancient world from A to Z. Routledge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalechamps J (1587) Historia generalis plantarum. Lyon, France

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bock (1986) The genus Beta: domestication, taxonomy, and interspecific hybridization for plant breeding. Acta Hort 182:333–343

    Google Scholar 

  • de Candolle A (1884) Der Ursprung der Culturpflazen. Brockhaus, Lipsia, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • de Candolle A (1885) Origin of cultivated plants. Appleton and Company, New York, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Candolle A (1904) The origin of cultivated plants, 2nd edn. Paul Kegan and Co, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • de Crescenzi P (1605) Trattato dell’agricoltura. Florence, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • de Divitiis E, Cappabianca P, de Divitiis O (2004) The Scola medica salernitana”: the forerunner of the modern university medical schools. Neurosurgery 55:722–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Lobel M (1576) Plantarum seu stirpium historia … etc. Ex Officina Christophori Plantinii Anterwep, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lobel M (1591) Icones stirpium seu plantarum tam exoticarum quam indigenarum … etc., Anterwep, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • de Toni E (1925) Il libro dei semplici di Benedetto Rinio. Memorie Pontificia Romana Accademia Nuovi Lincei 8:123–264

    Google Scholar 

  • de Tournefort JP (1700) Institutiones rei herbariae. Thypographia Regia, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vilmorin JL (1923) L’ hérédité de la betterave cultivée. Gauthier-Villars, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vilmorin L (1850) Note sur un projet d’experence ayant pur but d’ augmenter la richesse saccarine de la betterave. Sociètè Imperiale Centrale d’ Agricolture 6:169

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vilmorin L (1856) Note sur la création d’une nouvelle race de betteraves à sucre. - Considérations sur l’hérédité dans les végétaux. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences 43:113

    Google Scholar 

  • Diderot M, D’Alambert M (1751) Encyclopèdie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des metiérs. Briasson, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodoens R (1553) Stirpium historia etc. Ex Officina Iohannis Loci, Anterwep, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorsten T (1540) Botanicon, continens herbarum aliorumque simlicium. Frankfurth, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Durante C (1635) Herbario nuovo. Jacomo Bericchi et Jacomo Ternierij, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • East E (1912) The Mendelian notation as a description of physiological facts. Amer Nat 46:633–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • East EM, Jones DF (1919) Inbreeding and outbreeding: their genetic and sociological significance. J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia PA, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fahmy AG (1997) Evaluation of the weed flora of Egypt from Predynastic time to Graeco-Romans time. Veget Hist Archaeobot 6:241–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feemster-Jashemsky W, Meyer FG (2002) The natural history of Pompeii. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr WR (1987) Principles of cultivar development, 1st edn. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellner S (1879) Compendium der Naturwissenschaften an der Schule zu Fulda … etc. T. Grieben, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Benzon R (1894) Alteutsche Gardenflora, Untersuchungen über die Nutzpflanzen des deutschen Mittelater. Verlag Lipsius & Tischer, Lipsia, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford-Lloyd BV, Hawkes JG (1986) Weed beets, their origin and classification. Acta Horticult 82:399–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford-Lloyd BV, Williams ALS, Williams JT (1975) A revision of Beta section Vulgares (Chenopodiaceae), with new light on the origin of cultivated beets. Bot J Linn Soc 71:89–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francisco-Ortega J, Santos-Guerra A, Seung-Chul K, Crawford DJ (2000) Plant genetic diversity in the Canarian Islands: a conservation perspective. Am J Bot 87:909–919

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs L (1551) De historia stirpium commentarii insignes. Arnolletum, Lyon, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Funari PP (1998) Le rire populaire a Pompeii. Colloquie Int. “Le rire chez les anciennes”. Grenoble, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparrini-Leporace T, Paolucci G, Maffei SL (1952) Un inedito erbario farmaceutico medioevale. Leo S Olschki Editore, Florence, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerard P, Poggi G (1636) The herbal, or general history of plants. Ex Officina Harnoldi Hatfield. London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Geschwind L, Sellier E (1902) La Betterave. Association des Chemistes de Sucrèrie, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray SF (1821) A natural arrangement of British plants. vol 2. Printed for Baldwin, Kradook, and Joy. London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene EL (1909a) Carolus Linnaeus. Chrstopher Sower Company, Philadelphia PA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene EL (1909b) Linnaeus as an evolutionist. Proc Washington Academy of Science 9:17–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardwicke HJ (1887) Evolution and creation. A monthly record of science. Published by the author, Chicago MI, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlan JR (1992) Crops and man. American Society of Agronomy, Madison WI, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris JA (1917) Biometric studies on the somatic and genetic physiology of the sugar beet. Amer Nat 51:857–865

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill J (1775) The vegetable system etc. Trueman, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann S, Kadereit JW, Kadereit G (2006) Understanding Mediterranean-Californian disjunctions: molecular evidence from Chenopodiaceae-Betoideae. Taxon 55:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooker WJ (1835) The British flora. George Walker Arnott, Glasgow, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson BD (1881) Guide to the literature of botany; being classified selection of botanical works. Longmans & Green, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger W (1952) Diokles von Karystos und Aristoxenos von Tarent über die Prinzipien. Winter, Heidelberg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson T (1636) The Herbal or general history of plants by J. Gerard (Revised and enlarged by Thomas Johnson). Dover Publications, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajanus R (1910) Uber die Vererbungsweise gewisser Merkmale der Beta und Brassica Ruben. Z. fiir Pflanzenzuchtung 1:125–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy DJ (1913) Albertus Magnus catholic encyclopedia. Robert Appleton Co, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby WF (1906) British flowering plants. Sidney Appleton, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kircher A (1643) Lingua aegiptiaca restituta: opus tripartitum quo linguae coptae sive idiomatis illius primaevi Aegiptiorum Pharaonici plena instauratio continetur … Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner M, Hacker M (2010) Grüne Genetechnik. Wiley-VCH Verlag, Weinheim, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch DG (1858) Synopsis florae Germanicae et Helveticae. Gebhardt & Reisland, Lipsia, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Körber-Grohne U (1987) Nutzpflanzen in Deutschland. Thesis Stuttgart, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasochkin VT (1959) Review of the species of the genus Beta. Trudy Po Prikladnoi Botanike. Genetik i Selektsii 32:3–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasochkin VT (1960) Beet. Gos. Izdat. S.H. Lit. Moskow-Leningrad, Russia

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubiak-Martens L (1999) The plant food component of the diet at the late Mesolithic (Ertebolle) settlement at Tybrind Vig, Denmark. Veg Hist Archaeobot 8:117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubiak-Martens L (2002) New evidence for the use of root foods in pre-agrarian subsistence recovered from the late Mesolithic site at Halsskov, Denmark. Veget Hist Archaeobot 11:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamarck K (1810) Encyclopedie methodique botanique etc. France, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarini E, Di Vito M, Segre RV (2004) Historia Plantarum transcription. Panini ed., Modena, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Schulz B, Stich B (2010) Population structure and genetic diversity in elite sugar beet germplasm investigated with SSR markers. Euphytica 175:35–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linnaeus (1735) Systema Naturae. Thipis Joh. T. Trattnern, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabberley DJ (1997) The plant book. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnol P (1636) Botanicum Montspelliense. Ex Officina Danielis Pech, Montpellier, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpighi M (1675) Anatome plantarum. Regia Societate ad Scientiam Naturalem Promovendam. London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpighi M (1688) Opera omnia. Apud Ventrum Vander, Lyon, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Margraaf AS (1907) Chemischen Versuche einen wahren Zucker aus verschiedenen Pflanzen die in unseren Ländern wachsen zu ziehen. Reprinted in: Ostwald’s Klassiker der exacten Wissenschaft (1599) Engelmann, Lipsia, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattioli PA (1557) I discorsi di Pietro Andrea Mattioli, medico senese. Venice, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattioli PA (1565) Commentarij in sex libros Pedacij Dioscoridis Anazarbei, De medica materia. Ex Oficina Valgrisiana, Venice, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattioli PA (1586) De plantis epitome utilissima. Frankfurt, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath JM, Panella L, Frese L (2011) Beta. In: Cole C (ed) Wild crop relatives: genomic and breeding resources. Industrial crops. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner B (1926) Könige Babyloniens und Assyriens; Charakterbilder aus der altorientalischen Geschichte. Quelle & Meyer, Lipsia, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendel G (1865) Versuche über Plflanzenhybriden. Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines in Brünn, Bd. IV für das Jahr 1865. pp 3–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer EHF (1849) Die Insel Tenerife. Lipsia, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Michiel PA (1510) I cinque libri di piante. Reprinted by Reale Isituto di Lettere, Scienze ed Arti (1940). Venice, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller P (1768) Gardener’s Dictionary. Francis Rivington et al, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro F, Frese L, Castro S, Duarte MC, S. Paulo O, Loureiro J, Romeiras MM (2018) Genetic and genomic tools to assist sugar beet improvement: The value of wild crop relatives. Frontiers Plant Sci 9 Art. 74

    Google Scholar 

  • Munerati O, Mezzadroli C, Zapparoli TV (1913) Osservazioni sulla Beta maritima L. nel triennio 1910–1912. Staz Sper Ag Ital 46:415–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Munerati O, Zapparoli TV (1915) di alcune anomalie della Beta vulgaris L. Atti Regia Accademia dei Lincei 25:1239

    Google Scholar 

  • Musa Brassavola A (1537) Examen omnium simplicium medicamentorum, quorum in officinis usus est. Jean & François Frellon, Lyon, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Naccari FL (1826) Flora veneta. Bonvecchiato Editore, Venezia, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwhof A (2006) Changing landscape and grazing: macroremains from the terp Peins-east, province of Friesland, the Netherlands. Veget Hist Archaeobot 15:125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ober ES, Luterbacher MC (2002) Genotypic variation for drought tolerance in Beta vulgaris. Ann Bot 89:917–924

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pabst G (1887) Kohler’s medizinal Pflanzen Atlas. Kohler’s Verlag, Gera-Huntermhaus, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Pals JP (1984) Plant remains from Aartswoud, a neolithic settlement in the coastal area. In: van Zeist W, Casparie WA (eds) Plants and an cient man: studies in palaeoethnobotany. Proceedings of the sixth symposium of the International Work Group for Palaeoethnobotany, A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 313–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson J (1629) Paradisi in sole paradisus terrestris, or a garden of all sorts of pleasant flowers. Printed by Humfrey Lownes and Robert Young, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson J (1655) Matthiae de L’Obel Stirpium Illustrationes. Warren, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Pena P, de Lobel M (1576) Stirpium adversaria nova … etc. Ex Officina Christophori Plantinii Anterwep, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry D (1999) Vegetative tissues from Mesolithic sites in the northern Netherlands. Curr Anthropol 40:231–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pezzella F (2007) Un erbario indedito veneto (sec. XV) svela i segreti delle piante medicinali. Perugia, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzella S (1993) Gli erbari: i primi libri di medicina. Grifo, Perugia, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccoli F (2000) Storia ed evoluzione degli erbari. Gli erbari ferraresi. In: Chendi A (ed) Erbe ed erbari a Ferrara dal ‘400 ai giorni nostri. TLA Editrice, Ferrara, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitacco P (2002) Un prestito mai refuso: la vicenda del Liber de Simplicibus di Benedetto Rini. In: Borean L, Mason S (eds) Figure di collezionistia Venezia tra Cinquecento e Seicento. Forum, Udine, Italy, pp 11–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitard J, Proust L (1909) Les Iles Canaries, flore de I’archipel. France, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Poehlman JM (1987) Breeding field crops. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Poiret JLM (1827) Historie des plantes de l’ Europe. Ladrange et Verdierère, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray J (1693) Historia plantarum generalis. Smith & Walford, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray J (1703) Methodus plantarum emendata et aucta. Smith & Walford, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray J (1724) Synopsis methodica stirpium Britannicarum etc., 3rd edn. Innis, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach L, Reichenbach HG (1909) Icones florae Germanicae et Helveticae. Sumptibus Federici de Zezschwitz, Lipisia, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimpau W (1891) Kreuzungproducte landwirtschaftlicher Kulturpflanzen. Landwirtschaft Jahrbuch, vol 20, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Riva E (2010) The XV Century Venetian illuminated herbaria. http://www.cfs-cls.cz/Files/nastenka/page_3024/Version1/The%20XV%20Century%20Venetian%20Illuminated%20Herbaria.pdf

  • Rivera D, Obón C, Heinrich M, Inocencio C, Verde A, Farajado J (2006) Gathered Mediterranean food plants—In: Ethanobotanical investigators and historical development. In: Heinrich M, Müller WE, Galli C (eds) Local Mediterranean food plants and nutraceuticals. Forum Nutr, Karger, pp 18–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson DE, Harild JA (2002) The archeobotany of an early Hertebolle (late mesolithic) site at Hallskow, Denmark. In: Mason SUR, Hather JA (eds) Hunter - gatherer archeobotany. Institute of Archeology, London, UK, pp 50–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Roccabonella N (1457) Liber simplicibus. Manuscript SS. Giovanni e Paolo, Venice, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Santoni S, Bervillè A (1992) Two different satellite DNAs in Beta vulgaris L: Evolution, quantification and distribution in the genus. Theor Appl Genet 84:1009–1016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santoni S, Bervillè A (1995) Characterization of the nuclear ribosomal DNA units and phylogeny of Beta L. wild forms and cultivated beets. Theor Appl Genet 83:533–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider JG (1794) Scriptorum rei rusticae veterum latinorum. Fritsch, Lipsia, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultes JA (1817) Gründniss einer Geschichte and Literatur der Botanik. Schaumburg, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw B, Thomas TH, Cooke DT (2002) Response of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) to drought and nutrient deficiency stress. Plant Growth Regul 37:77–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shun ZF, Chu SY, Frese L (2000) Study on the relationship between Chinese and East Mediterranean Beta vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris (leaf beet group) accessions. In: Maggioni L, Frese L, Germeier CU, Lipman E (eds) Report of a Working Group on Beta. First meeting, 9–10 Sept 1999, Broom’s Barn, Higham, Bury St. Edmunds, UK. IPGRI, Rome, Italy, pp 65–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvatico M (1523) Opus pandectarum medicinae. Venice, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds NW (1976) Evolution of crop plants. Longman, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JE (1803) English botany. Taylor Printer, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Soldano A (2003) l’erbario di Ulisse Aldrovandi. Istituto Veneto di Lettere Scienze ed Arti, Venice, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontheimer G (1845) Heilmittel der Araber. Frieburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Squalermo L (1561) Liber de simplicibus … etc. Valgrisi, Venice, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes J (1812) Botanical materia medica, vol 2. Johnson & Co. London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant J (1919) Notes on edible plants. JB Lyon and Co, Albany NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanara V (1674) Economia del cittadino in villa. Curti Stefano, Venice, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Teza E (1898) “De Simplicibus” di Benedetto Rinio nel Codice marciano. Atti Regio Istituto Veneto Lettere Scienze Arti 9:18–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton RJ (1812) Elements of Botany. J. Whiting, London, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Throop P (1998) Physica by Hildegard von Bingen. Reprinted and translated by P. Throop. Healing Arts Press, Rochester VE, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschermak-Seysenegg E (1951) The rediscovery of the Gregor Mendel’s work. J Heredity 42:163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner N (1995) Food plants of coastal first people. Royal British Columbia Museum handbook. UBC Press, Vancouver, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulbrich E (1934) Chenopodiaceae. In: Engler A, Harms H (eds) Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany, pp 375–584

    Google Scholar 

  • van Raamsdonk LWD (1993) Wild and cultivated plants: the parallelism between evolution and domestication. Evol Trend Plants 7:73–84

    Google Scholar 

  • van Zeist W, de Roller GJ (1993) Plant remains from Maadi, a predynastic site in Lower Egypt. Veget Hist Archaeobot 2:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventura J (1998) Il”De materia medica” nel Medioevo: madiazione araba e ricezione occidentale. In: Speer A, Wagener L (eds) Wissen über Grenzen. De Gruyter, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Veyssiere de la Croze C (1755) Lexicon aegiptiaco-latinum. Typographus Clarendonianus Oxonii, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt R, Grüger E, Beier J, Meischner D (2008) Seasonal variability of Holocene climate: a paleolimnological study on varved sedimens in Lake Jues (Harz Mountains, Germany). J Paleolimnol 40:1021–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Boguslawski E (1984) Zur Geschichte der Beta-Rübe als Kulturpflanze bis zum Beginn des 19 Jahrhundert. Institut für Zuckerrübenforschung, Göttingen, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • von Lippmann EO (1925) Geschichte der Rübe (Beta) als Kulturpflanze. Verlag Julius Springer, Berlin, Germany

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • von Lippmann EO (1929) Geschichte des Zuckers, 2nd edit. Verlag Julius Springer, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • von Proskowetz E (1910) Über das Vorkommen der Wildformen der Zuckerrüben am Quarnero. Österreiche-Ungarische Zeitschrift für Zuckerindustrie und Landwirtschaft 47:631–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinmann JG (1737) Phytanthoza iconographia, sive conspecus. Hieronimum Lentium, Ratisbona, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzmann K (1979) Illustrations in rolls and codex. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner C (1993) History of the crop. In: Cooke DA, Scott RK (eds) The sugar beet crop: science into practice. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Woenig F (1866) Die Pflanzen in alten Aegypten. Verlag von Wilhelm Friedrich, Lipsia, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Ximenez F (1615) De la naturaleza, y virutes de las plantas. Diego Lopez, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanichelli G (1735) Storia delle piante che nascono ne’lidi attorno a Venezia. Venice, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohary D (2004) Unconscious selection and the evolution of domesticated plants. Econ Bot 58:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohary D, Hopf M (1973) Domestication of pulses in the Old World. Science 182:887–894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zohary D, Hopf M (2000) Domestication of plants in the old world: The origin and spread of cultivated plants in West Asia. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford, UK, Europe and the Nile Valley

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrico Biancardi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Biancardi, E., Lewellen, R.T. (2020). History and Current Importance. In: Biancardi, E., Panella, L., McGrath, J. (eds) Beta maritima. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28748-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics