Skip to main content

Apiaceae

Apiaceae Lindl., Intr. Nat. Syst. Bot., ed. 2: 21 (1836), nom. cons. et nom. alt.

Umbelliferae Juss., Gen. Pl.: 218 (1789), nom. cons. et nom. alt.

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Flowering Plants. Eudicots

Abstract

Annual, biennial or perennial, monocarpic or polycarpic, caulescent or acaulescent, glabrous or pubescent or glandular-pubescent herbs, rarely suffrutescent or woody subshrubs, shrubs or trees, evergreen or deciduous; with taproots, rhizomes, or unbranched to branched rootstocks, sometimes swollen and tuberiform; with schizogenous secretory canals throughout the plant. Stems erect, ascending, decumbent, prostrate or rarely creeping; branched or unbranched; with multilacunar (or rarely trilacunar) nodes, internodes sometimes fistulose. Leaves alternate, rarely opposite or verticillate; petioles usually present and typically sheathing at base, often inflated, without (or rarely with) stipules; blades ternately or pinnately compound, or pinnately, ternately, or palmately lobed, or simple and entire to toothed, to deeply divided, rarely sessile or perfoliate; venation pinnate or less commonly palmate or parallel. Plants andromonoecious or hermaphroditic, rarely gynodioecious to dioecious. Inflorescences compound-umbellate (less commonly simple-umbellate, capitulate or cymose), arranged in cymose or racemose synflorescences; umbels typically subtended by an involucre of one to many bracts at the base of the rays (secondary axes), bracts entire or dissected, or lacking; umbellules typically subtended by involucel of one to many bracteoles at the base of the pedicels, bracteoles entire or dissected, or lacking. Flowers perfect or staminate (rarely functionally pistillate), epigynous, actinomorphic (or outer flowers of the umbel or umbellule zygomorphic). Perianth and androecium 5-merous (rarely 5–6-merous). Calyx lobes linear to lanceolate, triangular, or ovate, sometimes spiny or pinnatisect, or small to obscure. Petals valvate, usually basally clawed and having a narrowed, inflexed apex (less commonly with broad insertion and/or lacking the inflexed apex), sometimes lobed (or shortly notched to deeply bifid), dorsally glabrous or puberulent; sometimes with one to several secretory ducts. Stamens alternate with the petals; anthers dorsifixed or basifixed, tetrasporangiate, dehiscing by longitudinal slits; filaments filiform, inflexed in bud. Ovary syncarpous of 2 carpels (rarely 1 or 2–4), each carpel unilocular with apical to axile placentation; stigmas on stylodia; stylodia distinct, rarely connate, frequently reflexed in fruit, usually swollen at the base to form a nectariferous disc or stylopodium. Ovules anatropous, pendulous, two per locule (but one always abortive), unitegmic, tenuinucellate or pseudocrassinucellate. Fruits dry (rarely fleshy), usually schizocarpic with two mericarps attached by a commissural face, usually with a bifurcated or entire carpophore (becoming free from or remaining fused to the mericarps at maturity); fruits with filiform, keeled, corky, winged, dentate, spiny or obscure ribs formed over the vascular bundles (primary ribs), and sometimes formed in the furrows or valleculae (secondary ribs); one or more secretory canals found in association with the vascular strands (rib oil ducts, sometimes obscure) and/or in the valleculae and commissural face (vittae, sometimes arranged cyclically); endocarp parenchymatous (soft to lignified) or sclerified. Seeds straight, endosperm at commissural face plane to deeply concave or sulcate, copious and oily; embryo minute but often well differentiated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Selected Bibliography

  • Banasiak, Ł., Wojewódzka, A., Baczyński, J., Reduron, J.-P., Piwczyński, M., Kurzyna-Młynik, R., Gutaker, R., Czarnocka-Cieciura, A., Kosmala-Grzechnik, S., Spalik, K. 2016. Phylogeny of Apiaceae subtribe Daucinae and the taxonomic delineation of its genera. Taxon 65: 563–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthlott, W., Neinhuis, C., Cutler, D., Ditsch, F., Meusel, I., Theisen, I., Wilhelmi, H. 1998. Classification and terminology of plant epicuticular waxes. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 126: 237–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann-Bodenheim, M.G. 1955. Ableitung und Bau bicarpellat-monospermer und pseudomonocarpellater Araliaceen- und Umbelliferen-Früchte. Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges. 65: 481–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behnke, H.-D. 1971. Sieve-tube plastids of Magnoliidae and Ranunculidae in relation to systematics. Taxon 20: 723–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C.R. 1971. Breeding systems and floral biology of the Umbelliferae, or evidence for specialization in unspecialized flowers. In: Heywood, V.H. (ed.) The Biology and Chemistry of the Umbelliferae, Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 64, Suppl. 1. London & New York: Academic Press, pp. 93–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C.R., Lindsey, A.H. 1982. The umbel as a reproductive unit in the Apiaceae. In: Cauwet, A.M., Carbonnier, J. (eds.) Contributions Pluridisciplinaires à la Systématique; actes du 2ème Symposium International sur les Ombellifères, Centre Universitaire de Perpignan. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden, pp. 739–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M.D., Leitch, I.J. 2005. Plant DNA C-values Database (release 4.0). http://www.rbgkew.org.uk/cval/database1.html

  • Bentham, G. 1867. Umbelliferae. In: Bentham, G., Hooker, J.D. (eds.) Genera Plantarum 1. London: Reeve & Co., pp. 859–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenbaum, M.R. 1990. Evolution of specialization in insect-umbellifer associations. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 35: 319–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borg-Karlson, A.-K., Valterova, I., Nilsson, L.A. 1994. Volatile compounds from flowers of six species in the family Apiaceae: bouquets for different pollinators? Phytochemistry 35: 111–119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Calviño, C.I., Downie, S.R. 2007. Circumscription and phylogeny of Apiaceae subfamily Saniculoideae based on chloroplast DNA sequences. Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 44: 175–191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cerceau-Larrival, M.-T. 1962. Plantules et pollens d’ombellifères. Leur intérêt systématique et phylogénique. Mém. Mus. Natl Hist. Nat., sér. B, Bot. 14: 1–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerceau-Larrival, M.-T. 1971. Morphologie pollinique et corrélations phylogénétiques chez les Ombellifères. In: Heywood, V.H. (ed.) The Biology and Chemistry of the Umbelliferae, Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 64, Suppl. 1. London & New York: Academic Press, pp. 109–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, E.J.H. 1976. The seeds of dicotyledons, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courchet, L. 1884. Étude anatomique sur les Ombellifères et sur les principales anomalies de structure que présentent leurs organes végétatifs. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot., sér. 6, 17: 107–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowden, R.K., Harbourne, J.B., Heywood, V.H. 1969. Chemosystematics of the Umbelliferae – a general survey. Phytochemistry 8: 1963–1984.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G.L. 1966. Systematic embryology of the angiosperms. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, J.W. 1971. Relationships of the New Zealand Umbelliferae. In: Heywood, V.H. (ed.) The Biology and Chemistry of the Umbelliferae, Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 64, Suppl. 1. London & New York: Academic Press, pp. 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deschamps, R. 1982. Un cas intéressant d’évolution entre une espèce fossile arborescente d’Afrique et son correspondant actuel Steganotaenia araliacea (Ombellifères). In: Cauwet-Marc, A.-M., Carbonnier, J. (eds.) Les Ombellifères: Contributions Pluridisciplinaires à la Systématique: actes du 2ème Symposium International sur les Ombellifères, Centre Universitaire de Perpignan. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden, pp. 207–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degtjareva, G.V., Kljuykov, E.V., Samigullin, T.H., Valiejo-Roman, C.M., Pimenov, M.G. 2013. ITS phylogeny of Middle Asian geophilic Umbelliferae-Apioideae genera with comments on their morphology and utility of psbA-trnH sequences. Pl. Syst. Evol. 299: 985–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degtjareva, G.V., Pimenov, M.G., Samigullin, T.H. 2018. Molecular data allow to elucidate the taxonomic placement of some Umbelliferae from Middle Asia and Afghanistan (Pinacantha, Ladyginia, Peucedanum mogoltavicum). Phytotaxa, 350: 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desjardins, S.D., Leslie, A.C., Stace, C.A., Schwarzacher, T., Bailey, J.P. 2015. Intergeneric hybridization between Berula erecta and Helosciadium nodiflorum (Apiaceae). Taxon 64(4): 784–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diniz, F. 1969. Ombellifères pliocènes de Rio Major (Portugal). Naturalia Monspeliensia sér. Bot. Fasc. 20: 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downie, S.R., Katz-Downie, D.S., Spalik, K. 2000. A phylogeny of Apiaceae tribe Scandiceae: evidence from nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 87(1): 76–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Downie, S.R., Plunkett, G.M., Watson, M.F., Spalik, K., Katz-Downie, D.S., Valiejo-Roman, C.M., Terentieva, E.I., Troitsky, A.V., Lee, B.-Y., Lahham, J., El-Oqlah, A. 2001. Tribes and clades within Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae: the contribution of molecular data. Edinb. J. Bot. 58: 301–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downie, S.R., Spalik, K., Katz-Downie, D.S., Reduron, J.-P. 2010. Major clades within Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae as inferred by phylogenetic analysis of nrDNA ITS sequences. Pl. Divers. Evol. 128: 111–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drude, C.G.O. 1898. Umbelliferae. In: Engler, A., Prantl, K. (eds.) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien ed. 1, 3(8). Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann, pp. 63–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrieu, G. 1982. Les Champignons parasites et leur apport à la systématique des Ombellifères. In: Cauwet, A.-M., Carbonnier, J. (eds.) Contributions Pluridisciplinaires à la Systématique; actes du 2ème Symposium International sur les Ombellifères, Centre Universitaire de Perpignan. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden, pp. 549–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erbar, C., Leins, P. 1996. Distribution of the character states “early” and “late sympetaly” within the “Sympetalae Tetracyclicae” and presumably related groups. Bot. Acta 109: 427–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erbar, C., Leins, P. 1997. Different patterns of floral development in whorled flowers, exemplified by Apiaceae and Brassicaceae. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 158: S49–S64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erbar, C., Leins, P. 2004. Sympetaly in Apiales (Apiaceae, Araliaceae, Pittosporaceae). S. Afr. J. Bot. 70: 458–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erbar, C., Leins, P. 2010. Nectaries in Apiales and related groups. Pl. Divers. Evol. 128: 269–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esau, K. 1940. Developmental anatomy of the fleshy storage organ of Daucus carota. Hilgardia 13: 175–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Prieto, J.A., Cires, E. 2014. Phylogenetic placement of Dethawia, Meum, and Rivasmartinezia (Apioideae, Apiaceae): evidence from nuclear and plastid DNA sequences. Pl. Biosyst. 148(5): 975–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, D.H. 1971. Ethnobotany of the Umbelliferae. In: Heywood, V.H. (ed.) The Biology and Chemistry of the Umbelliferae, Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 64, Suppl. 1. London, New York: Academic Press, pp. 385–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossheim, A.A. 1967. Flora Kavkaza (Flora of Caucasus), ed. 2, vol 7. Leningrad: Nauk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruas-Cavagnetto, C., Cerceau-Larrival, M.T. 1982. Présence de pollens d’Ombellifères fossiles dans le Paléogène du bassin Anglo-Parisien: premiers résultats. In: Cauwet, A.-M., Carbonnier, J. (eds.) Contributions Pluridisciplinaires à la Systématique; actes du 2ème Symposium International sur les Ombellifères, Centre Universitaire de Perpignan. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden, pp. 255–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyot, M. 1966. Les stomates des Ombellifères. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 113: 244–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyot, M. 1971. Phylogenetic and systematic value of stomata in the Umbelliferae – Caucalideae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 64: 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyot, M. 1978. Intérêt des études de phytodermologie dans la famille des Ombellifères. In: Cauwet, A.M., Carbonnier, J. (eds.) Contributions Pluridisciplinaires à la Systématique; actes du 2ème Symposium International sur les Ombellifères, Centre Universitaire de Perpignan. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden, Louis., pp.133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havis, L. 1939. Anatomy of the hypocotyl and roots of Daucus carota. J. Agric. Res. 58: 557–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedge, I.C., Lamond, J.M. 1972. Microsciadium. In: Davis, P.H. (ed.) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol. 4, pp. 420–421. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegnauer, R. 1971. Chemical patterns and relationships of Umbelliferae. In: Heywood, V.H. (ed.) The Biology and Chemistry of the Umbelliferae, Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 64, Suppl. 1. London, New York: Academic Press, pp. 267–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegnauer, R. 1973. Umbelliferae. In: Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen, Vol. VI. Basel: Birkhäuser, pp. 554–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegnauer, R. 1989. Umbelliferae. In: Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen, Vol. IX. Basel: Birkhäuser, pp. 663–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D.M. 1973. The rust fungus genus Nyssopsora and its host relations. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinb. 32: 217–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoar, C.S. 1915. A comparison of the stem anatomy of the cohort Umbelliflorae. Ann. Bot. 29: 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holub, M., Toma, J., Herout, V. 1987. The phylogenetic relationships of the Asteraceae and Apiaceae based on phytochemical characters. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 15: 321–326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, C.E., Reduron, J.-P., Spencer, M.A., Cafferty, S. 2006. Typification of Linnaean plant names in Apiaceae. Taxon 55(1): 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jay, M. 1969. Chemotaxonomic researches on vascular plants. XIX. Flavonoid distribution in the Pittosporaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 62: 423–429.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Mejías, P., Vargas, P. 2015. Taxonomy of the tribe Apieae (Apiaceae) revisited as revealed by molecular phylogenies and morphological characters. Phytotaxa 212: 57–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jongejans, E., Telenius, A. 2001. Field experiments on seed dispersal by wind in ten umbelliferous species (Apiaceae). Pl. Ecol. 152: 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurica, H.S. 1922. A morphological study of the Umbelliferae. Bot. Gaz. 74: 292–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D.R. 1970. Comparative development and morphological interpretation of “rachis-leaves” in Umbelliferae. In: Robson, N.K.B., Cutler, D.F., Gregory, M. (eds.) New Research in Plant Anatomy, Suppl. 1, Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 63. London & New York: Academic Press, pp. 101–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz-Downie, D.S., Valiejo-Roman, C.M., Terentieva, E.I., Troitsky, A.V., Pimenov, M.G., Lee, B.-Y., Downie, S.R. 1999. Towards a molecular phylogeny of Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae: additional information from nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS sequences. Pl. Syst. Evol. 216: 167–195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kljuykov, E.V., Zakharova, E.A., Petrova, S.E., Tilney, P.M. 2014. On the unusual structure of the monocotyledonous embryo and seedling of Acronema commutatum H. Wolff (Apiaceae) and related species. Pl. Divers. Evol. 131: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, W.D.J. 1824. Generum tribuumque plantarum Umbelliferarum nova dispositio. Nova Acta Acad. Caes. Leop.-Carol. German. Nat. Cur. 12: 55–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koso-Poljansky, B. 1916. Sciadophytorum systematis lineamenta. Bull. Soc. Imp. Naturalistes Moscou 29: 93–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koul, P., Sharma, N., Koul, A.K. 1993. Pollination biology of Apiaceae. Curr. Sci. 65: 219–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzyna-Młynik, R., Oskolski, A.A., Downie, S.R., Kopacz, R., Wojewódzka, A., Spalik, K. 2008. Phylogenetic position of the genus Ferula (Apiaceae) and its placement in tribe Scandiceae as inferred from nrDNA ITS sequence variation. Pl. Syst. Evol. 274: 47–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B.-Y., Levin, G.A., Downie, S.R. 2001. Relationships within the spiny-fruited umbellifers (Scandiceae subtribes Daucinae and Torilidinae) as assessed by phylogenetic analysis of morphological characters. Syst. Bot. 26: 622–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leins, P., Erbar, C. 2004. Floral organ sequences in Apiales (Apiaceae, Araliaceae, Pittosporaceae). S. Afr. J. Bot. 70: 468–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, A.H. 1982. Floral phenology patterns and breeding systems in Thaspium and Zizia (Apiaceae). Syst. Bot. 7: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logacheva, M.D., Valiejo-Roman, C.M., Pimenov, M.G. 2008. ITS phylogeny of West Asian Heracleum species and related taxa of Umbelliferae–Tordylieae W.D.J. Koch, with notes on evolution of their psbA-trnH sequences. Pl. Syst. Evol. 270: 139–157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lubbock, J. 1892. A contribution to our knowledge of seedlings, Vol. II. New York: D. Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyskov, D.F., Samigullin, T.H., Pimenov, M.G. 2017. Molecular and morphological data support the transfer of the monotypic Iranian genus Alococarpum to Prangos (Apiaceae). Phytotaxa 299: 223–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacPhail, M.K., Alley, N.F., Truswell, E.M., Sluiter, I.R.K. 1994. Early Tertiary vegetation: evidence from spores and pollen. In: Hill, R.S. (ed.) History of the Australian vegetation: Cretaceous to Recent. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 189–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee, A.R., Calviño, C.I., Liu, M., Downie, S.R., Tilney, P.M., Van Wyk, B.-E. 2010. New tribal delimitations for the early diverging lineages of Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae. Taxon 59: 567–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathias, M.E. 1965. Distribution patterns of certain Umbelliferae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 52: 387–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathias, M.E., Constance, L. 1962. A revision of Asteriscium and some related Hydrocotyloid Umbelliferae. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 33: 99–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathias, M.E., Constance, L. 1965. A revision of the genus Bowlesia Ruiz & Pav. (Umbelliferae-Hydrocotyloideae) and its relatives. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 38: 1–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, C.R., Chalk, L. 1950. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, C.R., Chalk, L. 1983. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, S.P. 1961. Studies in the Umbellales. II. The vegetative anatomy. J. Indian Bot. Soc. 40: 424–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D.M. 1971. Chromosome studies in the Umbelliferae. In: Heywood, V.H. (ed.) The Biology and Chemistry of the Umbelliferae, Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 64, Suppl. 1. London & New York: Academic Press, pp. 233–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, J. 1981. Fossil pollen record of extant angiosperms. Bot. Rev. 47: 1–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolas, A.N., Plunkett, G.M. 2009. The demise of subfamily Hydrocotyloideae (Apiaceae) and the re-alignment of its genera across the entire order Apiales. Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 53: 134–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolas, A.N., Plunkett, G.M. 2012. Untangling Azorella, Laretia, and Mulinum (Apiaceae, Azorelloideae): insights from phylogenetics and biogeography. Taxon 61: 826–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolas, A.N., Plunkett, G.M. 2014. Diversification times and biogeographic patterns in Apiales. Bot. Rev. 80: 30–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostroumova, T.A. 1987. The types of stomata in representatives of the Apiaceae family. Bot. Zhurn. 72: 1479–1488. (in Russ.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostroumova, T.A. 1990. Stomatal types in the Umbelliferae in relation to taxonomy: tribes Corinadreae and Scandiceae. Feddes Repert. 101: 409–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostroumova, T.A., Kljuykov, E.V. 1991. Stomatal types as a taxonomic character in the Umbelliferae: tribe Apieae, subtribe Apiinae. Feddes Repert. 102: 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostroumova, T.A., Kljuykov, E.V. 2007. Stomatal types in Chinese and Himalayan Umbelliferae. Feddes Repert. 118: 84–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panahi, M., Banasiak, Ł., Piwczyński, M., Puchałka, R., Oskolski, A.A., Spalik, K. 2015. Phylogenetic relationships among Dorema, Ferula and Leutea (Apiaceae, Scandiceae, Ferulinae) inferred from nrDNA ITS and cpDNA noncoding sequences. Taxon 64: 770–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philipson, W.R. 1979. Araliaceae. Flora Malesiana, ser. 1, 9(1): 1–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimenov, M.G., Leonov, M.V. 1993. The Genera of Umbelliferae: a Nomenclator. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimenov, M.G., Pogorelova, O.V. 1974. Taxonomic position of the genera Ammi L. and Visnaga Mill. Rastit. Resur 10: 216–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimenov, M.G., Sdobnina, L.I. 1984. Nodal anatomy as a taxonomic character in the family Umbelliferae. Bot. Zhurn. 69: 283–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimenov, M.G., Ostroumova, T.A., Tomkovich, L.P. 1982. Petiole structure of the Caucasian Umbelliferae. Byull. Moskovsk. Obshch. Isp. Prir., Otd. Biol. 87: 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimenov, M.G., Ostroumova, T.A., Tomkovich, L.P., Kljuykov, E.V. 1986. La structure anatomique du petiole d’Ombellifères d’Asie Moyenne. Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. IV (8) B, Adansonia 1: 77–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimenov, M.G., Vasil’eva, M.G., Leonov, M.V., Daushkevich, J.V. 2003. Karyotaxonomical analysis in the Umbelliferae. Enfield, New Hampshire: Science Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimenov, M.G., Degtjareva, G.V., Ostroumova, T.A., Samigullin, T.H., Averyanov, L.V. 2016. Xyloselinum laoticum (Umbelliferae), a new species from Laos, and taxonomic placement of the genus in the light of nrDNA ITS sequence analysis. Phytotaxa 244: 248–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plunkett, G.M. 2001. Relationship of the order Apiales to subclass Asteridae: a re-evaluation of morphological characters based on insights from molecular data. Edinb. J. Bot. 58: 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plunkett, G.M., Nicolas, A.N. 2016. Assessing Azorella (Apiaceae) and its allies: phylogenetics and a new classification. Brittonia 69: 31–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plunkett, G.M., Chandler, G.T., Lowry II, P.P., Pinney, S.M., Sprenkle, T.S. 2004. Recent advances in understanding Apiales with a revised classification. S. Afr. J. Bot. 70: 371–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punt, W. 1984. Umbelliferae. In: Punt, W., Clarke, G.C.S. The Northwest European Pollen Flora 37. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 155–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reduron, J.-P., Muckensturm, B. 2007–2008. Ombellifères de France. Monographie des Ombellifères (Apiaceae) et plantes alliées, indigènes, naturalisées, subspontanées, adventices ou cultivées de la flore française, vol. 1–5. Jarnac: Soc. bot. Centre-Ouest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, R.L. 1971. The relationships of the Umbellales. In: Heywood, V.H. (ed.) The Biology and Chemistry of the Umbelliferae, Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 64, Suppl. 1. London & New York: Academic Press, pp. 63–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, I. 1977. Fruits of angiosperms. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlessman, M.A., Graceffa, L.M. 2002. Protogyny, pollination, and sex expression of andromonoecious Pseudocymopterus montanus (Apiaceae, Apioideae). Int. J. Pl. Sci. 163: 409–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solereder, H. 1908. Systematic anatomy of the dicotyledons, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalik, K. 1997. Revision of Anthriscus (Apiaceae). Polish Bot. Stud. 13(1): 1–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalik, K., Downie, S.R. 2001. The utility of morphological characters for inferring phylogeny in Scandiceae subtribe Scandicinae (Apiaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 88: 270–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spalik, K., Downie, S.R. 2007. Intercontinental disjunctions in Cryptotaenia (Apiaceae, Oenantheae): an appraisal using molecular data. J. Biogeogr. 34: 2039–2054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spalik, K., Wojewódzka, A., Downie, S.R. 2001. Delimitation of genera in Apiaceae with examples from Scandiceae subtribe Scandicinae. 58: 331–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalik, K., Reduron, J.-P., Downie, S.R. 2004. The phylogenetic position of Peucedanum sensu lato and allied genera and their placement in tribe Selineae (Apiaceae, subfamily Apioideae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 243: 189–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spalik, K., Downie, S.R., Watson, M.F. 2009. Generic delimitations within the Sium alliance (Apiaceae tribe Oenantheae) inferred from cpDNA rps16-5’trnK (UUU) and nrDNA ITS sequences. Taxon 58: 735–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spalik, K., Banasiak, Ł., Feist, M.A.E., Downie, S.R. 2014. Recurrent short-distance dispersal explains wide distributions of hydrophytic umbellifers (Apiaceae tribe Oenantheae). J. Biogeogr. 41: 1559–1571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuhlfauth, T., Fock, H., Huber, H., Klug, K. 1985. The distribution of fatty acids including petroselinic and tariric acids in the fruit and seed oils of the Pittosporaceae, Araliaceae, Umbelliferae, Simarubaceae, and Rutaceae. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 13: 447–453.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, F.-J., Downie, S.R. 2010. Phylogenetic relationships among the perennial, endemic Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae of western North America: additional data from the cpDNA trnF-trnL-trnT region continue to support a highly polyphyletic Cymopterus. Pl. Divers. Evol. 128: 151–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terentieva, E.I., Valiejo-Roman, C.M., Samigullin, T.H., Pimenov, M.G., Tilney, P.M. 2015. Molecular phylogenetic and morphological analyses of the traditional tribe Coriandreae (Umbelliferae-Apioideae). Phytotaxa 195(4): 251–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, C.C. 1967. Anatomical studies of flowers and fruits in the Hydrocotyloideae (Umbelliferae). Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 42: 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valiejo-Roman, C.M., Terentieva, E.I., Samigullin, T.H., Pimenov, M.G., Ghahremani-Nejad, F., Mozaffarian, V. 2006. Molecular data (nrITS-sequencing) reveal relationships among Iranian endemic taxa of the Umbelliferae. Feddes Repert. 117: 367–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Tieghem, P. 1872. Sur les canaux oléo-résineaux des Ombellifères et des Araliacées. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 19: 113–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Tieghem, P. 1884. Sur la structure et les affinités des Pittosporées. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 31: 384–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wyk, B.-E., Tilney, P.M., Magee, A.R. 2013. African Apiaceae: a synopsis of the Apiaceae/Umbelliferae of sub-Saharan Africa and Madagascar. Pretoria: Briza Academic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenitz, G. 1992. The Asteridae: evolution of a concept and its present status. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 209–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warning, W.C. 1934. Anatomy of the vegetative organs of the parsnip. Bot. Gaz. 96: 44–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, L., Dallwitz, M.J. 1992 onwards. The families of flowering plants: descriptions, illustrations, identification, and information retrieval. Version: 9th September 2008. http://delta-intkey.com/angio/index.htm

  • Webb, C.J. 1981. Andromonoecism, protandry, and sexual selection in Umbelliferae. New Zealand J. Bot. 19: 335–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzel, C., Rønsted, N., Spalik, K., Simonsen, H.T. 2014. Resurrecting deadly carrots: towards a revision of Thapsia (Apiaceae) based on phylogenetic analysis of nrITS sequences and chemical profiles. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 174: 620–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. M. Plunkett .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Plunkett, G.M. et al. (2018). Apiaceae. In: Kadereit, J., Bittrich, V. (eds) Flowering Plants. Eudicots. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93605-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics