Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants ((FAMILIES GENERA,volume 3))

Abstract

Mostly bulbous plants, rarely (Schoenolirion and Chlorogalum) rhizomatic. Bulbs subterraneous or epigeal, formed by thickened cataphylls and/or foliage leaf bases, sometimes with intercalated nonstoring cataphylls. Scales in adult bulbs basally vaginate, imbricate, or more or less connate. Foliage leaves 1-many, rarely (Bowiea, Schizo-basis) lacking in the adult bulb, spirally or more rarely distichously arranged, all forming part of the bulb, filiform to elliptic or circular, very rarely (Ledebouria petiolata, L. rupestris, Drimiopsis) petiolate, grooved or more rarely flat or terete. Leaf blades shed after 2–8 months at a preformed area at the apex of the bulb. Raphide cells and mucilage in all tissues copiously present. Feeding roots functioning for 8–12 months, the thicker ones often branched; contractile roots often present and thicker than the feeding roots; storage roots rarely present (Ledebouria). Inflorescence scapose, an (open) simple raceme or rarely a spike, rarely a compound raceme, very rarely more strongly branched (Bowiea, Schizobasis),varying in length, bearing 1-hundreds of flowers. Bracts of varying shape and size, sometimes lacking. Prophylls present or lacking. Flowers not articulated from the pedicel (except Chlorogaleae), hermaphrodite, hypogynous, trimerous, actinomorphic or rarely zygomorphic; the (pseudo-) terminal flowers often sterile and sometimes of different shape and coloration. Tepals 3 + 3, free or more or less connate, white, blue, red, yellow, brownish or greenish, inner and outer usually ± equal in shape, position, and color. Stamens 3 + 3, with sometimes 1 sterile whorl, of various shape, sometimes appendaged, the filaments sometimes connate at the base, or rarely forming a para-corolla. Anthers introrse, epipeltate, dehiscing longitudinally. Ovary superior to rarely (Bowiea) hemi-inferior. Pistil syncarpous, tricarpellate, ± trilocular, with innerseptal nectaries (Autonoë excepted). Style with a simple stigma, sometimes thickened, the stigma Wet or Dry; ovules anatropous, bitegmic, crassinucellar, in each locule 2 ovules superjacent, or 1 or 2 side by side, or several to numerous in 1 or 2 rows or disordered. Capsule ± wide loculicidally opening, with the locules separating ventrally as well, dry or fleshy. Seeds spherical, ellipsoidic, drop-shaped, rounded or flattened and angular, sometimes alate, yellow, brown or black, rarely pink.

Translation by H.-H. Poppendieck

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Bibliography

  • Baker, J.G. 1870. Monograph of Scilla: Ledebouria and Drimiopsis. Saunder’s Ref. Bot. 3, Appendix: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J.G. 1871. A revision of the genera and species of herbaceous capsular gamophyllous Liliaceae. J. Linn. Soc. ( London ) 11: 349–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J.G. 1873. Revision of the genera and species of Scilleae and Chlorogaleae. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 13: 209–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batsch, A.I.G.C. 1786. Dispositio generum plantarum ienensium secundum Linnaeum et familias naturales. Ienae: Heller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, L. 1932. Monocotylous seedlings. Morphological studies in the post-seminal development of the embryo. Trans. Proc. Bot. Soc. Edinburgh 31: 5–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresinsky, A. 1963. Bau, Entwicklungsgeschichte und Inhaltsstoffe der Elaiosomen (Studien zur myrmekochoren Verbreitung von Samen und Früchten). Bibl. Bot. Heft 126. 54 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchner, L. 1948. Vergleichende embryologische Studien an Scilloideae. Osterr. Bot. Z. 95: 428–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cave, M.S. 1970. Chromosomes of the California Liliaceae. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 57: 1–48, t. I-VIII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chouard, P. 1931. Types de développement de l’appareil végétatif chez les Scillées. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. X, 13: 131–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cupov, V.S., Kutjavina, N.G. 1981. Serologiceskie issledovanija v porjadke Liliales I. II. Bot. Zhurn. 66: 75–81, 408–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cupov, V.S. 1994. Filogenija i sistema porjadkov Liliales i Asparagales. Bot. Zhurn. 79 (3): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cupov, V.S. 1995. Kompensirujuscij vozvrat priznakov v primitivnoe sostojanie. Bot. Zhurn. 80 (4): 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daumann, E. 1970. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaunay, L.N. 1915. Étude comparée caryologique de quelques espèces du genre Muscari Mill. Mem. Soc. Nat. Kiew 25: 33–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaunay, L.N. 1922. Vergleichende Untersuchungen einiger Muscari Mill. und Bellevalia Lapeyr. Arten. Vestn. Tiflis Bot. Sada II, 1: 24–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaunay, L.N. 1926. Phylogenetische Chromosomenverkürzung. Z. Zellf. Mikrosk. Anat. 4: 338–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, I. 1993. Systematische Karyologie und Embryologie von Prospero Salisb. und Barnardia Lindl. (Hyacinthaceae). Diss. Univ. Wien, 525 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, M.F., Chase, M.W. 1996. Resurrection of Themidaceae for the Brodiaea alliance, and recircumscription of Alliaceae, Amaryllidaceae and Agapanthoideae. Taxon 45: 441–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, A., Davina, J.R. 1991. Heterochromatin and genome size in Fortunatia and Camassia ( Hyacinthaceae ). Kew Bull. 46: 307–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, B., Nagl, W. 1979. Patterns of endopolyploidy and 2 C nuclear DNA content (Feulgen) in Scilla bifolia (Liliaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 131: 261–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frölich, D., Barthlott, W. 1988. See general references. Fuchsig, H. 1911. Vergleichende Anatomie der Vegetationssorgane der Lilioideen. Sitzungsber. Kais. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-Naturw. Kl., 120: 1–43, I-III.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbari, F., Greuter, W. 1970. On the taxonomy and typification of Muscari Miller ( Liliaceae) and allied genera, and on the typification of generic names. Taxon 19: 329–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greilhuber, J. 1982. Trends in der Chromosomenevolution von Scilla ( Liliaceae ). Stapfia 10: 11–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greilhuber, J., Deumling, B., Speta, F. 1981. Evolutionary aspects of chromosome banding, heterochromatin, satellite DNA, and genome size in Scilla (Liliaceae). Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 94: 249–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbritter, H., Hesse, M. 1993. Sulcus morphology in some monocot families. Grana 32: 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansgirg, A. 1904. Pflanzenbiologische Untersuchungen nebst algologischen Schlußbemerkungen. Wien: A. Hölder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasitschka-Jenschke, G. 1962. Notizen über endopolyploide Kerne im Bereich der Samenanlage von Angiospermen. Osterr. Bot. Z. 109: 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heel, W.A. van 1988. On the development of some gynoecia with septal nectaries. Blumea 33: 477–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, W., Tamm, Ch. 1981. Homoisoflavanones and biogenetically related compounds. Progr. Chem. Org. Nat. Prod. 40: 105–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzer, K. 1952. Untersuchungen zur karyologischen Anatomie der Wurzel. Osterr. Bot. Z. 99: 118–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, H. 1969. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J. 1934. The families of flowering plants. I I. Monocotyledons. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jernstedt, J.A. 1980. Anthesis and floral senescence in Chlorogalum pomeridianum (Liliaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 67: 824–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, J.P. 1975. Studies in the bulbous Liliaceae in South Africa: 5. Seed surface characters and generic groupings. J. South Afr. Bot. 41: 67–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krenn, L. 1994. Urginea. In: Hagers Handbuch der pharmazeutischen Praxis, Hsg. F. v. Bruchhausen, 5. Aufl., Bd. 6: 1030–1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubo, S., Mimaki, Y., Terao, M., Sashida, Y., Nikaido, T., Ohmoto, T. 1992. Acylated cholestane glycosides from the bulbs of Ornithogalum saundersiae. Phytochemistry 31: 3969–3973.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kubo, S., Mimaki, Y., Sashida, Y., Nikaido, T., Ohmoto, T. 1992. New cholestane bisdesmosides from the bulbs of Ornithogalum thyrsoides. Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan 65: 1120–1124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunth, C.S. 1843. Enumeratio plantarum, vol. IV. Stuttgardiae et Tubingae: J. G. Cottae.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunth, C.S. 1844. Über die natürliche Gruppe der Liliaceen im weitesten Sinne des Worts. Physik. Abn. König. Akad. Wiss. Berlin 1842: 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauber, H. 1947. Untersuchungen über das Wachstum der Früchte einiger Angiospermen unter endomitotischer Polyploidisierung. Österr. Bot. Z. 94: 30–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenski, I. 1958. Über die Brutzwiebelbildung auf den Blättern von Drimiopsis kirkii Bak. Planta 50: 579–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonay, H. 1902. Recherches anatomiques sur les feuilles de l’Ornithogalum caudatum AIT. Mém. Soc. Roy. Sci. Liège III, 4, (9) 1–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Medicus, F.K. 1791. Ueber Linnés Hyacinthen Gattung. Ann. Bot. ( Usteri ) 2: 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mimaki, Y., Sashida, Y., Kawashima, K. 1992. New steroidal constituents of the bulbs of Camassia cusickii Wats. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 40: 148–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Doblies, U., Müller-Doblies, D. 1996. Revisionula incompleta Ornithogalorum Austro-Africanorum. Feddes Repert. 107: 361–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obermeyer, A.A. 1978. Ornithogalum: a revision of the southern African species. Bothalia 12: 323–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obermeyer, A.A. 1980. The genus Sypharissa ( Liliaceae ). Bothalia 13: 111–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascher, A. 1959. Zur Blütenbiologie einer aasblumigen Liliacee und zur Verbreitungsbiologie abfallender geflügelter Kapseln. Flora 148: 153–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radulescu, D. 1973. Recherches morpho-palynologiques sur la famille Liliaceae. Acta Bot. Hort. Bucurestensis 1972 /73: 133–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafinesque, C.S. 1837. Flora telluriana. Philadelphia: H. Probasco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, R.A. 1866. The genera of plants. A fragment containing part of Liriogamae. London: J. v. Voorst.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, R. 1973. Organogenesis of flowers. Toronto Buffalo: Univ. of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savile, D.B.O. 1962. Taxonomic disposition of Allium. Science 196: 792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sernander, R. 1906. Entwurf einer Monographie der europäischen Myrmekochoren. K. Svenska Vet. Akad. Handl. 41 /7: 1–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnarf, K. 1929. Die Embryologie der Liliaceae und ihre systematische Bedeutung. Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-Naturwiss. Kl. 138, Abt. I: 69–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, W. 1980. Beiträge zur Taxonomie der Liliifloren. VI. Der Umfang der Liliaceae. Wiss. Z. Friedrich-Schiller-Univ. Jena, Math.-Naturwiss. Reihe 29: 607–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrzypczak, L. 1977. Zwiazki flawonoidowe w chemicznej taksonomii rodziny Liliaceae. Herba Polon. 22: 336–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speta, F. 1971. Beitrag zur Systematik von Scilla L. subgen. Scilla (inklusive Chionodoxa Boiss.). Österr. Bot. Z. 119: 6–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speta, F. 1972. Entwicklungsgeschichte und Karyologie von Elaiosomen an Samen und Früchten. Naturk. Jahrb. Stadt Linz: 9–65, t. I-X.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speta, F. 1979. Karyological investigations in Scilla in regard to their importance for taxonomy. Webbia 34: 419–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speta, F. 1980. Karyosystematik, Kultur und Verwendung der Meerzwiebel (Urginea Steinh., Liliaceae s.l.). Linzer Biol. Beitr. 12: 193–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speta, F. 1982. Über die Abgrenzung und Gliederung der Gattung Muscari und über ihre Beziehungen zu anderen Vertretern der Hyacinthaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 103: 247–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speta, F. 1984. Zwiebeln - versteckte Vielfalt in einfacher Form. Linzer Biol. Beitr. 16: 3–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speta, F. 1985. Nomenklatorische, morphologische und karyologische Bemerkungen über Lindneria clavata (Masters) Speta (Hyacianthaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 106: 123–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speta, F. 1986. Über die herbstblühenden Scillen des Mittelmeerraumes. Linzer Biol. Beitr. 18: 399–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speta, F. 1987. Die verwandtschaftlichen Beziehungen von Brimeura Salisb.: ein Vergleich mit den Gattungen Oncosterna Rafin., Hyacinthoides Medic. und Camassia Lindl. ( Hyacinthaceae ). Phyton (Austria) 26: 247–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speta, F. 1998. Systematische Analyse der Gattung Scilla ( Hyacinthaceae ). Phyton (Austria) 37: 120–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockhouse, R.E., Wells, H. 1978. Pollination ecology of Chlorogalum pomeridianum (DC.) Kunth (Liliaceae). Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 77: 124–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svoma, E. 1981. Zur systematischem Embryologie der Gattung Scilla L. (Liliaceae). Stapfia 9: 124 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svoma, E., Greilhuber, J. 1988. Studies on systematic embryology in Scilla (Hyacinthaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 161: 169–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svoma, E., Greilhuber J. 1989. Systematic embryology of the Scilla siberica alliance (Hyacinthaceae). Nord. J. Bot. 8: 585–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirton, C.H. 1976. Thuranthos: notes on generic status, morphology, phenology and pollination biology. Bothalia 12: 161–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillich, H.-J. 1992. Bauprinzipien und Evolutionslinien bei monocotylen Keimpflanzen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 114: 91–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillich, H.-J. 1995. Seedlings and systematics in Monocotyledons. In: Rudall, P.J., Cribb, P.J., Cutler, D.F., Humphries, C.J. (eds.) Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution: 303–352. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilton, V.R., Homer, H.T. 1983. Carpel development, anatomy, and function in the reproductive process in Ornithogalum caudatum ( Liliaceae ). Flora 173: 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, St. 1954. Blütenbiologische Typen als Elemente der Sippengliederung dargestellt anhand der Flora Südafrikas. Bot. Stud. 1. 338 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, R. 1936. Vergleichende Untersuchungen von Pollenkörnern einiger Liliaceen und Amaryllidaceen. Österr. Bot. Z. 85: 30–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, R. 1937. Zur vergleichenden Embryologie der Liliaceae-Scilloideae. Flora 132: 48–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahariadi, C. 1962. Caractères morphologiques, anatomiques et biologiques dans la taxonomie du genre Ornithogalum. Rev. Biol. 7: 5–41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Speta, F. (1998). Hyacinthaceae. In: Kubitzki, K. (eds) Flowering Plants · Monocotyledons. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03533-7_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03533-7_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08377-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03533-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics