Skip to main content
Log in

Anthropogenic pressure on structure and composition of a shola forest in Kerala, India

  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The montane closed evergreen forests found at altitudes above 1,800 m in the Western Ghats of India possess a distinct vegetation type and are called shola forests. Despite the fact that these forests are located in relatively inaccessible areas, they are still under anthropogenic pressure leading to continued habitat degradation and loss of biomass and biodiversity. A case study was conducted in Mananvan shola, the largest shola forest in Kerala of Western Ghats, to recognize the impact of disturbance on vegetation structure, composition and regeneration pattern, to identify the socio-economic reasons for disturbance and to evolve strategies for its management. In the disturbed part of the forest, dominance of light demanding species in tree, shrub and herb communities has been recorded. Here even the dominance of exotic species in tree seedling, shrub and herb communities is prominent. Skewed girth class distribution of tree community with poor representation by the individuals of girth class 30.1 to 90.0 cm, is also an indication of the collection of small wood and poles from the forest. The RISQ (Ramakrishnan Index of Stand Quality) in the disturbed area of the forest is above 2.0 as against near to 1.0 in relatively undisturbed forest stands suggesting that the disturbance is intensive and thus natural recovery process would be slow. Socioeconomic analysis in villages located near the shola forest revealed the fact that the people depended heavily on this forest for their livelihood. Thus, the crux and the success of future management and conservation strategy depend on how one can reduce the dependency of people on the shola vegetation. Enrichment planting in disturbed parts of shola, enhancement of firewood by raising energy plantations, as well as development of lemongrass and firewood based agroforestry systems and reduction of grazing pressure by developing silvopastoral systems are the major strategies for the conservation of these shola forests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blasco F. 1970. Aspects of the Flora and Ecology of Savannas of the South Indian Hills. Journal of Bombay Natural Historical Society 67:522–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • BURTT-DAVY J. 1938. The Classification of Tropical Woody Vegetation Types. Imperial Forest Institute Paper No. 13. Manager of Publications, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHAMPION H.G. 1936. Preliminary Survey of the Forest Types of India and Burma. Indian Forest Record. Vol.1. Manager of Publications, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHAMPION H. G. and SETH S. K. 1968. A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. Manager of Publications, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekharan C. 1960. Forest Types of Kerala State. Special paper submitted for Diploma in Forestry. New Forest, Dehra Dun, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrashekara U. M. 1998. Ramakrishnan Index of Stand Quality (RISQ): An Indicator for the Level of Forest Disturbance. In: Damodaran, A.D. (ed.), Proceedings of the Tenth Kerala Science Congress. State Committee on Science, Technology and Environment, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. Pp. 398–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrashekara, U.M. 2000. Forest and agricultural ecosystem analysis to assess ecosystem health and to identify rehabilitation strategies. In: Ramakrishnan, P.S. et al. (eds.), Mountain Biodiversity, Land use Dynamics and Traditional Ecological Knowledge. UNESCO. Oxford & IBH Publ. New Delhi. Pp. 177–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrashekara U. M. and Ramakrishnan P. S. 1994. Vegetation and Gap Dynamics of a Tropical Wet Evergreen Forest in the Western Ghats of Kerala, India. Journal of Tropical Ecology 10: 337–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrashekara U. M. and Sankar S. 1998. Ecology and Management of Sacred Groves in Kerala, India. Forest Ecology and Management 112: 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CURTIS J. T. 1959. The Vegetation of Wisconsion: an Ordination of Plant Communities. University of Wiscosin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denslow J.S. 1980. Patterns of Plant Species Diversity during Succession under Different Disturbance Regimes. Oecologia 46: 18–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doumenge C., Giolmour, D., Perz, M.R. and Blockhus J. 1995. Tropical Montane Cloud Forests: Conservation Status and Management Issues. In: Hamilotn, L.S. et al. (eds.), Tropical Montane Cloud Forests. Springer-Verlag, New York. Pp. 24–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • GAMBLE J. S. 1928. Flora of the Presidency of Madras, 3 volumes. Adlered & Son Limited, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry A.H. 1992. Tropical forest biodiversity: distributional patterns and their conservational significance. Oikos 63: 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose S., Sreepathy, A., Kumar, B. M. and Venugopal, V. K. 1994. Structural, Floristic and Edaphic Attributes of the Grassland-Shola Forests of Eravikulam in Penisular India. Forest Ecology and Management 65: 279–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoop W.T. and Walker, B.H. 1985. Interactions of Woody and Herbaceous Vegetation in Southern African Savanna, Journal of Ecology 73:235–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunhinkrishnan E. 2001. The Sholas and Grasslands in the Western Ghats. Science India 4:29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAL J.B. 1989. India’s Forests; Myth and Reality. Nataraj Publisher, Dehra Dun, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • MISHRA K.C. 1989. Manual of Plant Ecology. Oxford and IBH Publishing Company. New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAIR S. C. 1991. The Southern Western Ghats: A Biodiversity Conservation Plan. INTACH, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • PASCAL J. P. 1988. Wet Evergreen Forests of the Western Ghats of India: Ecology, Structure, Floristic Composition and Succession. Institut Francais de Pondicherry, Pondicherry, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrings C. and Walker B.H. 1997. Biodiversity, Resilience and the Control of Ecological Economic System: The Cases of Fire Driven Rangelands. Ecological Economics 22:73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrings C. 1989. An Optimal Path to Extinction? Poverty and resource degradation in the Open Agrarian Economy. Journal of Development Economics 30: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PHILLIPS E. A. 1959. Methods of Vegetation Study. Henry Hold & Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAI S. N. 1979. Gap Generation in Wet Evergreen Forest of Karnataka. Karnataka Forest Department Research Paper, KFD-2. Karnataka Forest Department, Bangalore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranganathan C. R. 1938. Studies on the Ecology of the Grassland Vegetation of the Nilagiri Plateau. Indian Forester 64: 523–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangarajan A. 1997. Shredding the Nilgiris. Sanctuary Asia 17: 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roba A.W. 2000. Costs and Benefits of Protected Areas: Marsabit Forest Reserve, Northern Kenya. In: Perrings, C. (ed.), The Economics of Biodiversity Conservation in Sub-Shaharan Africa. Edward Elgar, U.K. Pp. 115–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHIMPER A.F.W. 1903. Plant Geography upon a Physiological Basis. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • THOMAS, A. 2000. Cost of Cultivation of One Hectare of Lemon Grass. Kerala Agricultural University, Aromatic and Medicinal Plants Research Station, Odakkali, Kerala, India.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chandrashekara, U.M., Muraleedharan, P.K. & Sibichan, V. Anthropogenic pressure on structure and composition of a shola forest in Kerala, India. J. Mt. Sci. 3, 58–70 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-006-0058-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-006-0058-0

Key words

Navigation