A new species and new records of Hymenopellis and Xerula (Agaricales, Physalacriaceae) from China

View article
Microbiology

Introduction

Hymenopellis RH Petersen is a genus of the Xerula/Oudemansiella complex which is characterized by a moist to glutinous pileus surface (Petersen & Hughes, 2010). Numerous species of Hymenopellis have been recorded as edible (Wu et al., 2019). One mushroom known as “Heipijizong” has been identified as Hymenopellis raphanipes and is extensively cultivated in China (Hao et al., 2016; Niego et al., 2021; Sun et al., 2016; Xiao, He & Liu, 2022).

The Xerula/Oudemansiella complex has a historical origin dating back to 1880 when Spegazzini first established the genus Oudemansia Speg. It was later renamed as Oudemansiella in 1881 by Spegazzini (1881). In 1933, Maire established the genus Xerula (Maire, 1933). In the realm of classical taxonomy, the epitaxial and subordinate classification system of Oudemansiella, has been a subject of extensive debate among researchers, especially the relationship between Oudemansiella, Mucidula, Mycenella and Xerula (Boursier, 1924; Clémençon, 1979; Dörfelt, 1979; Lange, 1914; Moser, 1955; Pegler & Young, 1986; Singer, 1964). Moser (1955) proposed the Oudemansiella s.l., and merged Xerula and Mucidula into the genus Oudemansiella. Singer (1964), Singer (1986) accepted this perspective and proposed the concept of the subtribe Oudemansiellinae, which include subg. Oudemansiella and subg. Xerula. Clémençon (1979) proposed a taxonomic system consisting of five subtribes and nine groups. This system was based on acceptance of Xerula as a subgenus of Oudemansiella, and Mycenella as a separate genus. However, Pegler & Young (1986) proceeded with the two subgenera treatments suggested by Singer and proposed a systematic treatment of two subgenera and five groups. Dörfelt (1979) retained Oudemansiella and Xerula as two separate genera, and some researchers also accepted this view (Boekhout & Bas, 1986; Contu, 2000; Dörfelt, 1979; Halling & Mueller, 1999; Petersen, 2008; Petersen & Nagasawa, 2006).

In the 21st century, researchers have demonstrated, based on the finding of morphological and molecular systematics, that Oudemansiella and Xerula are two independent genera. Furthermore, the numerous species that were previously classified under Xerula should now be reclassified under Oudemansiella (Redhead, 1987; Wang et al., 2008). Zhang (2006) showed that the Oudemansiella may be divided into three groups: sect. Oudemansiella, sect. Dactylosporina and sect. Radicatae based on molecular phylogenetic studies constructed from (ITS) and (nrLSU). Wang et al. (2008) redefined the genus Xerula s. str. and providing characterizations of the genus. Yang et al. (2009) excluded the narrowly defined genus Xerula from the genus Oudemansiella and categorized the genus Oudemansiella into four groups: sect. Oudemansiella, sect. Mucidula, sect. Dactylosporina and sect. Radicatae. Petersen & Hughes (2010) revised the taxonomic relationships of the Xerula/Oudemansiella complex based on morphological evidence and molecular phylogenetic results from ITS and nrLSU. They proposed 68 new taxa, including four new genera (Hymenopellis, Paraxerula, Pointiculomyces, Protoxerula), accepting the definition of the genus Xerula from Yang et al. (2009), these results have been widely accepted and cited in subsequent studied (He et al., 2019; Niego et al., 2021; Park et al., 2017).

Hymenopellis species are widely distributed in Europe and North America (Petersen & Hughes, 2010), but they can also be found on other continents, such as Asia and Oceania (Niego et al., 2021; Yang, 1993). So far, there are 43 species records in Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org) of which 12 species have been recorded in China (Petersen & Hughes, 2010; Yang, 1993; Yao et al., 2020).

During a survey of macrofungal resources in the Henan and Jilin Provinces of China, we collected some specimens of Hymenopellis. After conducting a comprehensive study that combins morphological and phylogenetic analysis, we the identification of a new species, a new record from China and two new records from Henan. These findings contribute to the overall species diversity within the taxon and provide valuable molecular data for further research in this field.

Materials and Methods

Sampling and morphological analysis

The specimens were gathered from Biyang County, Henan Province and Shulan City, Jilin Province, China. Voucher specimens were deposited in the Herbarium of Mycology of Jilin Agricultural University (HMJAU). Macroscopic morphological characteristics are derived from field observations of fresh specimens, while microscopic morphology is examined using a light microscope. The primary reagents utilized in the analysis included a 5% solution of potassium hydroxide (KOH), a 1% solution of Congo red solution, and Meler’s reagent solution. The colors of basidiomata were described using the color coding system developed by Kornerup and Wanscher’s (Kornerup & Wanscher, 1978). The size of basidiospores is expressed as (a) b–c (d), where “a” is the minimum and “d” is the maximum, and 95% of the observed range falls between b–c. “Q” is the ratio of the length to width of the basidiospores, and “Q ± av” is the average Q ± standard deviation of all basidiospores (Dong & Bau, 2022; Wang et al., 2022).

DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing

The total DNA was extracted from dried specimens using the NuClean Plant Genomic DNA kit (Kangwei Century Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Primers for amplification of ITS were ITS 4 and ITS 5 (He et al., 2023; Ward & Akrofi, 1994), nrLSU were LROR and LR5 (Kauserud & Schumacher, 2001; Wang & Yang, 2023). The PCR program was as follows: pre-denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; then followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 50 s, annealing at 50 °C (ITS and nrLSU) for 50 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 70 s. Finally, a final elongation at 72 °C for 8 min was included. Then, the PCR products were sent to Biotechnology Co., Ltd. in Shanghai, China for sequencing.

Phylogenetic analysis

The news sequences were uploaded on NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). ITS and nrLSU sequences of related taxa were retrieved from GenBank and related articles (Hao et al., 2016; Lin et al., 2021; Matheny et al., 2006; Niego et al., 2021; Petersen & Hughes, 2010; Qin et al., 2014). The sequences obtained in this study, along with those of related taxa, are listed in Table 1. The ITS and nrLSU datasets include 109 sequences from 33 species of 7 genera within the Physalacriaceae family. Flammulina yunnanensis ZW Ge & Zhu L. Yang and Flammulina velutipes (Curtis) Singer were selected as outgroups for the phylogenetic analysis of the Hymenopellis, Paraxerula americana (Dörfelt) RH Petersen and Paraxerula hongoi (Dörfelt) RH Petersen were selected as outgroups for the phylogenetic analysis of Xerula.

Table 1:
DNA sequence information for constructing phylogenetic trees.
Taxon Voucher Locality GenBank
ITS nrLSU
Flammulina velutipes TENN 56073 London, England AF030877 HM005085
F. yunnanensis HKAS 32774 China DQ486704* DQ457667*
Gloiocephala aquatica CIEFAP 50 Argentina DQ097356* DQ097343*
G. menieri DAOM 170087 Canada DQ097358* DQ097345*
Hymenopellis altitude HMJAU 67050 Henan, China OR035776 OR036095
H. biyangensis HMJAU 67043 Henan, China OR035770 OR036089
H. biyangensis HMJAU 67044 Henan, China OR035771 OR036090
H. biyangensis HMJAU 67045 Henan, China OR035772 OR036091
H. biyangensis HMJAU 67046 Henan, China OR035773 OR036092
H. biyangensis HMJAU 67047 Henan, China OR035774 OR036093
H. biyangensis HMJAU 67048 Henan, China OR035775 OR036094
H. chiangmaiae SFSU DED7661 Malasia HM011506 HM005135
H. colensoi 12902,H2 New Zealand HM005140
H. colensoi 12902,H1 New Zealand HM005139
H. furfuracea TENN 59876 TN, GSMNP, USA GQ913367 HM005126
H. furfuracea AFTOL-ID 538 Massachusetts, USA DQ494703 AY691890
H. gigaspora TENN 50050 NSW, Australia GQ913359
H. gigaspora TENN 50056 NSW, Australia GQ913358
H. hispanica 05110401 (SEST) Spain HM005082
H. incognita TENN 58768 TX, YSA GQ913425 HM005082
H. limonispora TENN 59438 TN, Knox County, USA GQ913406 HM005133
H. limonispora TENN 61379 TN, Knox County, USA GQ913403
H. limonispora TFB 12913 TN, Knox County, USA HM005134
H. megalospora TENN 59556 GQ913416
H. megalospora TENN 59556 GQ913418
H. radicata TENN 62837 Sweden GQ913377 HM005125
H. radicata TENN 60093 Russia GQ913393
H. raphanipes HMJAU 67039 Henan, China OR035766 OR036085
H. raphanipes HMJAU 67051 Henan, China OR035767 OR036086
H. raphanipes HMJAU 67041 Henan, China OR035768 OR036087
H. raphanipes HMJAU 67042 Henan, China OR035769 OR036088
H.raphanipes HKAS 95782 Hunan, China KX688236 KX688263
H. raphanipes HKAS 95783 Shandong, China KX688238 KX688265
H. sinapicolor TENN 56566 Thailand GQ913352 HM005118
H. sinapicolor TENN 56566 Thailand GQ913353 NG059449
Hymenopellis sp AGTN-2022b Thailand OP265165
Hymenopellis sp AGTN-2022b Thailand OP265164
H. trichofera MEL2293664 Australia GQ913354 HM005129
H. vinocontusa TMI7669 Japan GQ913370
Oudemansiella radicata var. australis HKAS47605 Yunnan, China AY961000* AY960992*
O. radicata var. australis HKAS47606 Yunnan, China AY961001* AY960993*
Paraxerula americana CLO4746 New Mexico, USA HM005142 HM005094
P. americana DBG21746 Colorado, USA HM005143 HM005093
P. ellipsospora HKAS 56261 Yulong County, Yunnan, China KF530557 KF530567
P. hongoi HKAS 51985 Hokkaido, Japan KF530561 KF530566
P. hongoi C 60612 Japan HM005144 HM005095
Rhodotus asperior HKAS 56754 Yingjiang County, Yunnan, China KC179737 KC179745
R. palmatus HMJAU 6872 Antu County, Jilin, China KC179742 KC179752
Strobilurus albipilatus TENN52599 Canada GQ892804 HM005089
S. conigenoides TENN61318 North Carolina, USA DQ097370 HM005091
Xerula hispida TENN58745 Costa Rica, San Jose HM005164* HM005098*
X. melanotricha TFB11917 Russia HM005160* HM005099*
X. melanotricha LE10304 Russia HM005159*
X. melanotricha GMMueller7030 AY665191* AY804269*
X. pudens Popa1969 Germany MF063189* MF063124*
X. pudens TFB11432 Austrialia HM005154 HM005097
X. pudens C 63308 Spain HM005155
X. sinopudens Feng266 Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China KF530551 KF530571
X. sinopudens ZRL20151504 LT716059* KY418875*
X. strigosa HMJAU67049 Henan, China OR030918 OR030419
X. strigosa Zhu528 Cheng county, Gansu China KF530556* KF530569*
X. strigosa Zhu513 Cheng county, Gansu, China KF530555 KF530568
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16681/table-1

Notes:

Sequence retrieved from GenBank. The newly generated sequences in this study are indicated in bold.

The sequences from the two datasets were compared and manually modified separately using BIOEDIT (Hall, Biosciences & Carlsbad, 2011; Ye & Bau, 2022). PartitionFinder 2 was used to determine the optimal model scheme for two multi-locus datasets (Lanfear et al., 2017). Maximum parsimony analysis was applied to a combined dataset of two genera, following the approaches described by Li, Zhao & Liu (2022). Phylogenetic analyses of the two genera were performed using the maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) methods, respectively. The maximum likelihood method (ML) was performed using IQTree 1.6.8 (Nguyen et al., 2015), with ultrafast bootstrapping and 5,000 repetitions. The Bayesian inference (BI) was performed using MrBayes 3.2.6 (Deng et al., 2022; Ronquist et al., 2012) in PhyloSuite 1.2.2 (Zhang et al., 2020), running for 2,000,000 generations. The initial 25% of the sampled data was discarded as burn-ins.

Nomenclature

“The electronic version of this article in Portable Document Format (PDF) will represent a published work according to the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, and hence the new names contained in the electronic version are effectively published under that Code from the electronic edition alone. In addition, new names contained in this work have been submitted to MycoBank from where they will be made available to the Global Names Index. The unique MycoBank number can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the MycoBank number contained in this publication to the prefix “http://www.mycobank.org/MycoTaxo.aspx?Link=T&Rec=”. The online version of this work is archived and available from the following digital repositories: PeerJ, PubMed Central SCIE, and CLOCKSS.” (https://peerj.com/about/policies-and-procedures/#new-species).

Results

Molecular phylogeny

The two-locus gene dataset (ITS + LSU) of Hymeopellis contains 51 sequences and 1,770 aligned characters in length. Out of these, 1,242 characters are constant, 439 characters are parsimony-informative, and 89 characters are variable and parsimony-uninformative. For the multi-locus data set of Hymenopellis, the optimal model for ITS was HKY + F + I + G4 (Liao et al., 2022), and the optimal model for nrLSU was K2P + I (Ripplinger & Sullivan, 2008). Because the phylogenetic trees generated from the combined dataset using ML and BI analyses exhibited nearly identical topology, we have chosen to display only the ML tree (Fig. 1). In the phylogenetic tree, H. biyangensis and H. altissima are belonged to the genus Hymenopellis, and each forms a well-supported branch (BP = 99, PP = 1 and BP = 99, PP = 1).

Phylogenetic tree constructed from the combined ITS and nrLSU dataset using ML methods.

Figure 1: Phylogenetic tree constructed from the combined ITS and nrLSU dataset using ML methods.

The two values of the internal node represent Maximum Likelihood bootstrap (MLBP > 70%)/Bayesian posterior probability (BIPP > 90%). Our species sequences are marked in bold.
Phylogenetic tree constructed from the combined ITS and nrLSU dataset using ML methods.

Figure 2: Phylogenetic tree constructed from the combined ITS and nrLSU dataset using ML methods.

The two values of the internal node represent Maximum Likelihood bootstrap (MLBP > 70%) / Bayesian posterior probability (BIPP > 90%). Our species sequences are marked in bold.
Basidiomata of Hymenopellis and Xerula.

Figure 3: Basidiomata of Hymenopellis and Xerula.

(A, B) Hymenopellis biyangensis (A HMJAU67045, B HMJAU67048) (C) Hymenopellis altissima (HMJAU67050) (D, F) Hymenopellis raphanipes (D HMJAU67041, F HMJAU67051) (E) Xerula strigosa (HMJAU67049). Scale bars: 1 cm.
Microscopic features of Hymenopellis biyangensis..

Figure 4: Microscopic features of Hymenopellis biyangensis..

(A) Pileipellis (B) Cheilocystidia (C) Basidiospores (D) Pleurocystidia (E) Hymenium (F) Caulocystidia. Scale bars: 20 µm.

Hymenopellis raphanipes collected from Biyang County, China, is found on the same branch as Hymenopellis raphanipes distributed in two other locations (Fig. 1), and it received strong support (BP = 100, PP = 1).

The two-locus gene dataset (ITS + LSU) of Xerula contains 16 sequences and 1,676 aligned characters in length. Out of these, 1,395 characters are constant, 202 characters are parsimony-informative, and 79 characters are variable and parsimony-uninformative. For the multi-locus data set of Xerula, the optimal model for ITS was HKY + G (Liu et al., 2017), and the optimal model for nrLSU was GTR + I (Posada, 2008). In the phylogenetic tree, Xerula strigosa collected from Biyang County, China was located in the same clade as X. strigosa from Yunnan (Fig. 2), which received high support (BP = 100, PP = 1).

Taxonomy

Hymenopellis biyangensisY.J. Liu, B. Zhang & Xiao Li sp. nov.
MycoBank No: 848957
Figs. 3A3B and 4

Etymology. “biyangensis” refers to its type locality Biyang County.

Holotype. China, Henan Province, Zhumadian City, Biyang County, WanFenSi, 113°36′40″E, 32°51′45″N, 11 July, 2021 (HMJAU67048).

Description. Basidiomata moderate-to-large sized. Pileus 30–105 mm in diam, surface dry to viscid, sticky when wet, subumbonate, convex to plano-concave, darker in center, brownish gray (10E2) or reddish brown (8D5), outward brownish orange (6C3) to light brown (7D4), yellowish grey (3B2), brown (7E4) when young, slightly to strongly radially wrinkled from subumbonate onto margin (at margin occasionally net-like), sometimes with short inconspicuous stripes on margin. Context white (1A1), not discolored when cut. Lamellae adnate with decurrent tooth, white (1A1), sometimes with dark brown (8F8) spots, subdistant, in 3–4 tiers, thick, 2–9 mm deep. Stipe 75–100  × 5–14 mm, hollow, subcylindrical, tapering upward, white (1A1) to brown (7E4) from the pileus to downwards, with ciliate squamulose. Pseudorhiza at least 62 mm long, 10–14 mm broad, tapering downward, brownish orange (6C4, 6C5) to light brown(6D5).

Lamelar trama subregular, composed of 3–30 µm diameter, hyaline hyphae, without clamp connection. Basidia 40–70 × 9–19 µm, clavate, with 2-spored, rarely 4-spored, sterigmata 5–14 µm long, without clamp connection. Basidiospores (13) 14–20 (20.5) × (8.5) 11–15 (17) µm, [Q = (1.07) 1.13–1.52 (1.57), Qm = 1.28 ± 0.12], subglobosus, ellipsoid to broadly ellipsoid, hyaline in 5% KOH, smooth, inamyloid. Pleurocystidia 62–143  × 23–56 µm, pedicellate, broadly clavate, paddle-sha ped to obovoid, hyaline or with yellow intracellular pigment. Cheilocystidia abundant, 48–137  × 10–36 µm, pedicellate, clavate, broadly utriform, hyaline. Stipe trama monomitic, composed of parallel hyphae 5–30 µm wide, hyaline. Stipitipellis 3–12 µm, composed of flavidus parallel hyphae, clamp connection rare. Caulocystidia 36–119  × 7–17 µm, narrowly clavate. Pileipellis a hymeniderm of 100–160 µm thick. Pileipellis over disc and near pileus margin similar, constructed by clavate, broadly clavate to sphaeropedunculate elements, 20–97  × 12–36 µm, hyaline or with brown intracellular pigment. Pileal hairs absent.

Habitat. Solitary or scattered on the soil of Quercus acutissima forest or Quercus acutissima and Castanea mollissima mixed forest.

Distribution. Henan Province, China

Additional specimens examined. China, Henan Province, Zhumadian City, Biyang County, Minzhuan Forest Farm, 32°52′18″N, 113°36′25″E, 10 July 2021. ZhengXiang Qi (HMJAU67043, HMJAU67044), GuiPing Zhao (HMJAU67047); China, Henan Province, Zhumadian City, Biyang County, WanFenSi, 32°51′45″N, 113°36′40″E, 11 July 2021. ZhengXiang Qi (HMJAU67045, HUJAU67046).

Notes. Hymenopellis biyangensis is characterized by its pileipellis lacks pileal hairs, broadly clavate, paddle-shaped to obovoid pleurocystidia and 2-spored basidia. Hymenopellis biyangensis is morphologically similar to H. furfuracea, but H. furfuracea differs in utriniform-pedicellate to narrowly ten pin-shaped (fusiform-subcapitulate) pleurocystidia (Petersen & Hughes, 2010; Yang, 1993). Hymenopellis biyangensis is also similar to H. vinocontusa, but the latter lacks caulocystidia (Petersen & Hughes, 2010).

Hymenopellis biyangensis have 2-spored basidia. According to Petersen & Hughes (2010) description of the 2-spored basidia species, H. biyangensis is similar to H. incognita (basionym: H. incognita f. bispora), but the latter has solid stipe and utriform, commonly submammilate pleurocystidia. Hymenopellis biyangensis is also similar to H. radicata (basionym: H. radicata var. bispora), but H. radicata differs in pileus margin without stripes, broadly fusiform with bluntly rounded apically pleurocystidia and obpyriform pileipellis elements.

Hymenopellis biyangensis have paddle-shaped to obovoid pleurocystidia, which is relatively uncommon in the genus. In this terms, H. biyangensis is similar to H. colensoi, but H. colensoi differs in pileipellis has pileal hairs and globose to subglobose basidiospores (H. colensoi 12–16  × 12.5–13.5 µm vs. H. biyangensis 14–20  × 11–15 µm) (Petersen & Hughes, 2010). Hymenopellis biyangensis is also similar to H. trichofera, but the latter pseudorhiza has white tomentum and the pileipellis has pileal hairs (Petersen & Hughes, 2010).

Hymenopellis altissima(Massee) RH Petersen
Basionym: Collybia altissima Massee, Bull. Misc. Inf., Kew(10): 358 (1914)
=Oudemansiella altissima (Massee) Corner, Gdns’ Bull., Singapore 46 (1): 56 (1994)
Figs. 3C and 5

Description. Basidiomata small sized. Pileus diameter 35 mm, plano-convex, greyish brown (7D3) to reddish brown (8E6), darker in the middle, strongly radially wrinkled from middle onto limb, stripes on margin. Context white (1A1), not discolored when cut. Lamellae white (1A1), adnate, disatant, thick, in 4 tiers. Stipe 63  × 3.8 mm, hollow, subcylindrical, gradually thickening down to the pseudorhiza, white (1A1) to brown (7E4) from the pileus to downwards, with ciliate squamulose. Pseudorhiza at least 77 mm, 5 mm wide, slightly tapered downward, white (1A1) to light brown (7D4).

Microscopic features of Hymenopellis altissima..

Figure 5: Microscopic features of Hymenopellis altissima..

(A) Pileipellis over disc (B) Pileipellis near margin (C) Pleurocystidia (D) Basidiospores (E) Cheilocystidia (F) Hymenium (G) Caulocystidia. Scale bars: 20 µm.

Lamellar trama regular, composed of hyphae 3–23 µm diameter, without clamp connection. Basidiospores (13) 14–17.5 (18) × (12.5) 13–16 (16.5) µm, [Q = (1) 1.03–1.21 (1.29), Qm = 1.10 ± 0.06], globose, subglobose, a few broadly ellipsoid, hyaline, smooth, thin-walled, inamyloid. Basidia 47–63  × 14–17 µm, clavate, 2-spored, sterigmata 5–9 µm long, without clamp connection. Pleurocystidia 90–165  × 22–39 µm, pedicellate, fusiform, obviously capitulates, hyaline or with yellow pigment, without clamp connection. Cheilocystidia abundant, 62–127  × 13–32 µm, pedicellate, clavate, narrowly utriform, hyaline, thin-walled. Stipitipellis composed of vertically arranged, hyaline, slightly thick-walled (≤1 µm), hyphae 3–16 µm broad. Caulocystidia 54–156  × 10–22 µm, clavate to narrowly utriform, thinning at the end, hyaline. Pileipellis an ixohymeniderm of 100–160 µm thick. Pileipellis over disc constructed by clavate to broadly clavate elements, 43–104  × 19–30 µm, hyaline or with brown intracellular pigment; pileipellis near margin constructed by sphaeropedunculate to clavate elements, 39–85  × 21–30 µm, hyaline or with brown intracellular pigment. Pileal hairs absent.

Habitat. Growing on the ground in a mixed forest of Quercus mongolica and Tilia tuan.

Distribution. China, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Russian Federation, Singapore (Petersen & Hughes, 2010).

Specimens examined. China, Jilin Province, Shulan City, Jiulongshan Forest Park. 3 August 2022, Lei Yue (HMJAU67050).

Notes. Hymenopellis altissima is characterized by strongly radially wrinkled from pileus middle onto limb, basidiospores globose, subglobose, pleurocystidia fusiform, obviously capitulated, without clamp connection. Our specimens have longer pseudorhiza (77 mm) differs from those described by other authors, who describe it as up to 16 mm (Petersen & Hughes, 2010) or 160 mm (Corner, 1994). Morphologically, H. altissima is relatively similar to H. vinocontusa, but H. vinocontusa differs in its ellipsoidal, ovate to sublimoniform basidiospores and fusiform-capitulated cheilocystidia (Petersen & Hughes, 2010). In addition, H. vinocontusa has 4-spored basidia, while H. altissima has 2-spored basidia.

Hymenopellis raphanipes(Berk.) R.H. Petersen
Basionym: Agaricus raphanipes Berk., Hooker’s J. Bot. Kew Gard. Misc. 2: 48, 1850
Figs. 3D, 3F and 6

Description. Basidiomata small-to-large sized. Pileus 23–95 mm in diam, initially hemispherical, later nearly expansus, slightly convex or concave, margin or upturned, margin dehiscence, greyish brown (6D2), brownish orange (7C3), light brown (6D4), brown (7E8) to dark brown (7F8), smooth, sometimes with reticulate veins near the margin. Context white (1A1), not discolored when cut. Lamellae adnate to sinuate or slightly decurrent, subdistant, in 3–4 tiers, thick, 6–12 mm deep, white (1A1) to cream (1B1), sometimes with brown(6E5, 7E6) spots. Stipe 64–200  × 4–12 mm, solid, subcylindrical, tapering upward, white (1A1) to grey (10C1, 13D1–16D1), surface densely covered with brown (7E6) felted squamulose but nearly white at apex. Pseudorhiza 35–75  × 8–13 mm, slightly tapered downward, white (1A1) to brown (6D7).

Microscopic features of Hymenopellis raphanipes..

Figure 6: Microscopic features of Hymenopellis raphanipes..

(A) Pileipellis (B) Cheilocystidia (C) Basidiospores (D) Pleurocystidia (E) Hymenium (F) Caulocystidia. Scale bars: 20 µm.

Lamellar trama regular, composed of 3–20 µm diameter, hyaline hyphae, without clamp connection. Basidia 32–75  × 9–19 µm, clavate, 2-spored, rarely 4-spored, sterigmata 5–12 µm long, thin-walled, hyaline. Basidiospores (14) 16–22 (23) × (7) 10–14 (15) µm, [Q = (1.25) 1.36–1.73 (1.75), Qm = 1.52 ± 0.12], ovoid, ellipsoid to broadly ellipsoid, hyaline, inamyloid, smooth. Pleurocystidia 66–150  × 20–48 µm, pedicellate, fusiform with prominent capitate apex, slightly thick-walled, hyaline. Cheilocystidia 52–274  × 14–50 µm, pedicellate, fusiform, narrowly clavate to clavate, thin-walled, hyaline. Stipitipellis consists of hyaline hyphae arranged longitudinally with a diameter of 3–20 µm, without clamp connection. Caulocystidia 35–206  × 7–19 µm, clavate, cylindrical, hyaline. Pileipellis a hymeniderm with some extended pileal hairs. Pileipellis over disc and near pileus margin similar, constructed by clavate, broadly clavate to sphaeropedunculate elements, 22–70  × 8–24 µm, hyaline or with brown intracellular pigment. Pileal hairs 65–181  × 9–22 µm, narrowly utriform to subcylindrical, thin-walled, hyaline.

Habitat. Solitary or scattered on the soil of mixed forests of Quercus robur and Torrey pine.

Distribution. Australia, China, India, Japan, Thailand (Petersen & Hughes, 2010).

Specimens examined. China, Henan Province, Zhumadian City, Biyang County, Tongshan Lake Forest Park, 32° 45′31″N, 113°30′51″E, 9 July 2022, YaJie Liu (HMJAU67039), 13 July 2022, YaJie Liu (HMJAU67040), 23 July 2022, YaJie Liu (HMJAU67051), 27 July 2022, YaJie Liu (HMJAU67042).

Notes. Hymenopellis raphanipes is characterized by small-to-large sized basidiomata, ovoid, ellipsoid to broadly ellipsoid basidiospore and fusiforms with prominent capitate apex pleurocystidia. Hymenopellis raphanipes is morphologically similar to H. radicata, but H. radicata differs in its glabrous stipe and the absent of pileal hairs (Hao et al., 2016; Petersen & Hughes, 2010). Hymenopellis raphanipes is also similar to H. furfuracea, but H. furfuracea differs in its hollow stipe and utriform-pedicellated to ten pin-shaped pleurocystidia (Hao et al., 2016; Petersen & Hughes, 2010).

Xerula strigosaZhu L. Yang, L. Wang & G.M. Muell. 2008
Figs. 3E and 7

Description. Basidiomata small sized. Pileus 15–30 mm in diam, convexus to plano-convexus, yellowish brown (5E5) to dark brown (6F7), dry, surface covered with brown setae, smooth at the margin, without stripes. Context white(1A1). Lamellae free to adnate, subdistant, white (1A1), with lamellulae, in 3 tiers, up to four mm deep. Stipe 100–125  × 2.5–3 mm, solid, cylindrical or slightly tapered upward, reddish brown (8E8) to dark brown (7F4), paler towards the apex, surface covered with setae of the same color as the stipe. Pseudorhiza 36–42 mm long, slightly tapered downward.

Microscopic features of Xerula strigosa..

Figure 7: Microscopic features of Xerula strigosa..

(A) Pileipellis near margin (B) Pileipellis over disc (C) Pleurocystidia (D) Basidiospores (E) Cheilocystidia (F) Hymenium (G) Caulocystidia. Scale bars: 20 µm.

Lamellar trama subregular, composed of 3–33 µm diameter, hyaline. Basidiospores (11) 12–16 (17) × (8) 9–12 (13) µm, [Q = (1.00) 1.09–1.52 (1.63), Qm = 1.30 ± 0.15], subglobosus, boradly ellipsoid to ellipsoid, hyaline. Basidia 27–67  × 13–18 µm, clavate, 4-spored, rarely 2-spored, sterigmata 5–9 µm long, without clamp connection at base. Pleurocystidia 78–135  × 18–33 µm, narrowly utriform, capitate to subcapitate at the top, often with yellowish crystalline deposits, without clamp connection. Lamellar edge fertile, with scattered cheilocystidia. Cheilocystidia 75–106  × 18–27 µm, narrowly utriform, hyaline, thick-walled (wall-2 µm thick), without clamp connection. Stipitipellis composed of vertically arranged, slightly yellow, hyaline, slightly thick-walled (≤1µm), hyphae 3–11 µm broad. Caulocystidia similar to pileosetae, 40–236  × 3–12 µm, lanceolate, thick-walled (≤2µm), yellowish brown. Pileipellis a hymeniderm with pileosetae. Pileipellis over disc constructed by narrowly clavate to clavate elements, 51–105  × 13–20 µm, hyaline or with light brown intracellular pigment; pileipellis at pileus margin constructed by subfusiform, pyriform or sphaeropedunculate elements, 43–63  × 12–18 µm, hyaline or with light brown intracellular pigment. Pileosetae 93–540  × 8–18 µm, lanceolate, thick-walled (wall 1–3 µm thick), yellowish brown.

Habitat. Growing on the ground in mixed broad-leaved forests dominated by Quercus robur.

Distribution. China, Pakistan (Krisai-Greilhuber et al., 2017).

Specimens examined. China, Henan Province, Zhumadian City, Biyang County, Minzhuan Forest Farm, 32°52′18″N, 113°36′25″E, 10 July 2021. ZhengXiang Qi (HMJAU67049).

Notes. Xerula strigosa is characterized by boradly ellipsoid to ellipsoid basidiospores, pleurocystidia narrowly utriform, capitate to subcapitate at the top and lanceolated pileocystidia. Xerula strigosa closely resembles X. pudens (Wang et al., 2008), compared with X. pudens, X. trigosa exhibits longer spores and thin-walled apex of pleurocystidia. Xerula strigosa also strongly resembles the X. hispida, but X. hispida differs in its 2-spored (rarely 4) basidia and pleurocystidia without a capitate apex.

A key to China species of Hymenopellis

1.  Pileipellis with pileal hairs.....................................................................................................2
–  Pileipellis without pileal hairs.................................................................................................8
2.  Context white beneath pileipellis and above lamellae..................................................3
–  Context fuliginous to avellaneous beneath pileipellis and above lamellae...H. colensoi
3.  Basidiospores amygdaliform.....................................................H. amygdaliformis
–  Basidiospores broadly ellipsoid, ovatus to sublimoniform..........................................4
4.  Cheilocystidia narrowly clavate to clavate, fusiform...........................................................5
–  Cheilocystidia fusiform with flagelliform apex............................H. hygrophoroides
5.  Pleurocystidia capitate or capitulate apex...............................................................................6
–  Pleurocystidia without capitate or capitulate apex..................................................................7
6.  Pleurocystidia utriform............................................................................H. furfuracea
–  Pleurocystidia fusiform ............................................................................H. raphanipes
7.  Pileus subumbonate, margin of the pileus with sripes......................H. megalospora
–  Pileus subumbonate, margin of the pileus without stripes............................H. bispora
8.  Stipe with annulate veil................................................................................H. velata
–  Stipe without annulate veil......................................................................................................9
9.  Basidia 2-spored....................................................................................................................10
–  Basidia 4-spored.......................................................................................................................11
10.  Pleurocystidia paddle-shaped, obovoid................................................H. biyangensis
–  Pleurocystidia fusiform, obviously capitulates............................................H. altissima
11.  Caulocystidia absent........................................................................H. vinocontusa
–  Caulocystidia exists................................................................................................................12
12.  Cheilocystidia broadly cylindrical.......................................................................................13
–  Cheilocystidia narawly utriform, fusiform, narrowly clavate to clavate......................14
13.  Stipe longitudinally lined, usually twisted, sometimes reluctantly reddish brown in
spots. or suffused below..................................................................................H. radicata
–  Stipe appearing minutely laccate as though viscid, with darker amorphous patches…….…... ..................................................................................H. orientalis
14.  Basidiospores globose to subglobose………………... ….................... H. japonica
–  Basidiospores subovate to sublimoniform…………………….... H. aureocystidiata

A key to China species of Xerula

1.  Basidia 2-spored, basidiospores globose, subglobose to ovoid …..…..Xerula hispida
–  Basidia 4-spored, basidiospores subglobose to broadly ellipsoid….............................2
2.  Pleurocystidia fusiform, often with crystalline deposited apex…………..…....…....3
–  Pleurocystidia fusiform, without crystalline deposits……….….......…X. sinopudens
3.  Clamp connections common………………………….………..............X. puden
–  Clamp connections absent……………………….………..............……X. strigosa

Discussion

In this study, a new species, Hymenopellis biyangensis, was discovered, along with a new record species of H. altissima for China. Additionally, two new record species, H. raphanipes and X. strigos a were found in Henan province through the use of morphology and molecular phylogeny.

In the phylogenetic analysis, the new species H. biyangensis formed an independent clade and was found to be a sister group with H. altissima, which received high support (BP = 99, PP = 1) (Fig. 1). However, the pileipellis of H. altissima has an ixohymeniderma while H. biyangensis does not. In addition, H. biyangensis and H. altissima can be distinguished by their pleurocystidia and basidiospores. H. biyangensis have paddle-shaped, obovoid pleurocystidia and ellipsoid to broadly ellipsoid basidiospores, while H. altissima has fusiform, obviously capitulates pleurocystidia and globose to subglobose basidiospores.

Pleurocystidia of Hymenopellis species are mostly described as “utriform”, “jar-shaped” and “ten pin-shaped” (Petersen & Hughes, 2010), while H. biyangensis has broadly clavate, paddle-shaped to obovoid pleurocystidia. In addition, both H. biyangensis and H. altissima are relatively rare 2-spore species in the genus Hymenopellis. Among the 2-spored species, the basidiospores of H. altissima are subglobose to globose different from the other species. Hymenopellis biyangensis, H. altissima and H. raphanipes are similar in habitat, growing on the forest dominated by Fagaceae. In the description by Hao (2016), Petersen & Hughes (2010), thirteen species of Hymenopellis that were found to grow in Fagaceae forests, particularly in Fagus and Quercus. This suggests that there may be a relationship between the growth of species in this genus and Fagaceae, which should be further studied.

Hymenopellis is a paraphyletic taxon (Vellinga, 2010) and represents a group of morphologically similar taxa that were previously distributed in several sections of Oudemansiella (Petersen & Hughes, 2010). Therefore, some researchers have also questioned the establishment of Hymenopellis. Hao (2016) proposed a new taxonomic system in which Oudemansiella is recognized as a highly supported monophyletic lineage, and should be treated as a single genus. A new systematic arrangement with three sections, namely, sect. Oudemansiella, sect. Dactylosporina and sect. Radicatae has been proposed; Hymenopellis should be subsumed into the genus Oudemansiella (Hao, 2016). Therefore, more researches on this taxon is still needed in the future.

Four species of XerulaXerula hispida, X. pudens, X. sinopudens and X. strigosa—have been previously reported in China (Mueller et al., 2001; Wang et al., 2008; Yao et al., 2020). Xerula strigosa has previously been reported only in China and Pakistan (Wang et al., 2008; Krisai-Greilhuber et al., 2017). In our phylogenetic analysis, X. strigosa is sister with X. sinopudens (Fig. 2), which is consistent with the results of Qin et al. (2014). Both specimens have small basidiomata and a pileus surface covered with setae. However, X. strigosa can be distinguished from X. sinopudens by its narrowly utriform pleurocystidia, which are capitate to subcapitate at the top and often have yellowish crystalline deposits (Wang et al., 2008; Liu, Zhao & Hyde, 2009).

Supplemental Information

Hymenopellis multigene matrix

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16681/supp-1

Xerula multigene matrix

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16681/supp-2
  Visitors   Views   Downloads