Skip the header
Open access
Technical Factsheet
Basic
25 February 2023

Didymella lycopersici (canker of tomato)

Identity

Preferred Scientific Name
Didymella lycopersici Kleb.
Preferred Common Name
canker of tomato
Other Scientific Names
Ascochyta lycopersici (Plowr.) Brunaud
Diplodina lycopersici Hollós
Phoma lycopersici (Plowr.) Jaczewski, 1898
Phoma lycopersici Cooke
Sphaeronaema lycopersici Plowr.
International Common Names
English
ascochyta blight
fruit rot of tomato
leaf spot of tomato
stem canker of tomato
stem rot of tomato
Spanish
pie negro criptogamico del tomate
pudricion del tallo del tomate
French
herpes de la tomate
pied noir de la tige de la tomate
Local Common Names
Germany
Krebs: Tomate
Stengelfäule
EPPO code
DIDYLY (Didymella lycopersici)

Pictures

Dark brown lesion girdling tomato stem just above soil level.
Lesion
Dark brown lesion girdling tomato stem just above soil level.
©AgrEvo
Secondary cankers further up tomato stem.
Secondary cankers
Secondary cankers further up tomato stem.
©AgrEvo
Conidiomata within lesion
©AgrEvo

Distribution

This content is currently unavailable.

Host Plants and Other Plants Affected

Symptoms

The initial symptom is usually a dark-brown, sunken lesion which eventually may girdle the stem just above soil level (Jones, 1991). Secondary cankers may develop later, higher up the stem. The soft, outer diseased tissue contains numerous conidiomata and, in damp conditions, conidia are extruded in slimy pink masses (Holliday and Punithalingam, 1970).

List of Symptoms/Signs

Symptom or signLife stagesSign or diagnosis
Plants/Fruit/lesions: black or brown  
Plants/Fruit/mummification  
Plants/Leaves/yellowed or dead  
Plants/Stems/discoloration of bark  
Plants/Stems/mycelium present  
Plants/Whole plant/plant dead; dieback  

Prevention and Control

Cultural Practices

Avoid wounds and high rates of watering. Remove diseased plants. Debris from the previous season's crop should also be removed and destroyed. In glasshouses the humidity should be kept below 90% RH and the temperature above 15°C (Verhoeff, 1962; Fagg and Fletcher, 1987; van Steekelenburg, 1988). Solarization of soil and of the reed canes (Arundo donax) or Eucalyptus stakes used to support tomatoes reduces disease incidence (Besri, 1983; Cartia, 1989; Besri, 1991).

Host-Plant Resistance

Resistance to D. lycopersici on F3- and Bc1-lines from interspecific crosses of L. esculentum with L. hirsutum and with L. hirsutum f. glabratum is not monogenic and is inherited in a dominant fashion (Boukema, 1982). Tomato grafting on the hybrid KNVF has shown resistance to D. lycopersici (Ginoux et al., 1978) but there is no tomato cultivar with complete resistance to the disease (Fagg and Fletcher, 1987).

Chemical Control

Preventive measures include spraying or drenching with iprodione, procymidone, dichlofluanid, maneb, folpet, captan, nabam and benomyl (Knight and Keyworth, 1960; Phillips, 1961; Channon, 1972; Cheah and Soteros, 1983; 1987; van Steekelenburg, 1988; Cheah et al., 1992). Following infection, satisfactory control can be achieved by painting isolated lesions with a mixture of benomyl or iprodione and a mineral oil (Fletcher and Sharpe, 1978; van Steekelenburg, 1988). In systems using the nutrient film technique, a combination of etridiazole or ethyl phosphonate and carbendazim or benomyl placed in the nutrient solution controls the disease (Staunton and Cormican, 1980).

Biological Control

Trichoderma harzianum strain VKM F-2477D gives good control of D. lycopersici and results in yield increases (Grin'ko, 1997). Favaron et al. (1993) demonstrated inhibition of D. lycopersici polygalacturonase by Allium cepa and A. porrum extracts.

Impact

D. lycopersici occurs sporadically in Europe and New Zealand. Modern techniques used in tomato production (culture in nutrient solutions and rockwool) have eliminated soil as a source of inoculum and have, therefore, reduced disease incidence. Despite this, localized outbreaks do occur: in one glasshouse in West Sussex, UK, 105 basal lesions (affecting 12% of the tomato plants) were recorded in June 1985, 6 months after the plants were established on rockwool (Fagg and Fletcher, 1987).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 25 February 2023

Language

English

Authors

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

VIEW ALL METRICS

SCITE_

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

EXPORT CITATIONS

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login Options

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Related Articles

Skip the navigation