Phaeomoniella chlamydospora (Petri disease)
Identity
- Preferred Scientific Name
- Phaeomoniella chlamydospora (W. Gams, Crous, M.J. Wingf. & Mugnai) Crous & W. Gams
- Preferred Common Name
- Petri disease
- Other Scientific Names
- Phaeoacremonium chlamydosporum W. Gams, Crous, M.J. Wingf. & Mugnai
- International Common Names
- Englishesca disease complexPetri declineyoung grapevine decline
- Local Common Names
- USAblack goo
Pictures
Distribution
Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
Host | Host status | References |
---|---|---|
Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit) | Unknown | Marco et al. (2000a) |
Olea europaea subsp. europaea (European olive) | Unknown | |
Vitis (grape) | Unknown | Stewart et al. (2003), Auger et al. (2004), Fourie and Halleen (2004), Choueiri et al. (2006), Luque et al. (2009) |
Vitis labrusca (fox grape) | Unknown | Stewart et al. (2003) |
Vitis vinifera (grapevine) | Main | Díaz and Latorre (2014), Baloyi et al. (2016), Fischer et al. (2016), Maharachchikumbura et al. (2016), Pintos et al. (2016) Gaínza-Cortés et al. (2020) |
Symptoms
Vitis vinifera is known to host 29 fungal diseases (Wilcox et al., 2015), including the so-called grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) affecting the vascular system and, in consequence, the wood, leaves and berries of the host plant. Esca, as one of the most destructive diseases within GTDs, is a complex disease whose symptoms may develop from the concomitant action of several factors (Mugnai et al., 1999; Graniti et al., 1999; 2000; Chiarappa, 2000; Fontaine et al., 2016; Mondello et al., 2018; Fischer and Peighami-Ashnaei, 2019). Petri disease (Surico, 2001), a well-known disease of young grapevine worldwide, is now generally accepted as a major component of the esca disease complex. The consistent isolation of fungi from discoloured or decayed wood of affected grapevines indicates a close relationship between particular stages of wood deterioration and individual species of fungi (Larignon and Dubos, 1997; Scheck et al., 1998; Mugnai et al., 1999; Bertsch et al., 2013). Petri disease, thought to be caused by fungi such as P. chlamydospora (only the anamorph is known) and/or Phaeoacremonium minimum (Togninia minima as teleomorph), is distinct from esca proper which, in addition to wood discolouration, is characterized by a more or less intensive white rot evident inside the trunk and main branches (Graniti et al., 2000; Fischer, 2006).
The development of esca complex-related symptoms is evident in the wood, on the berries and on the leaves. External symptoms can be of two types, chronic or acute. In the wood, symptoms attributed to P. chlamydospora (and/or P. minimum, and/or other species, for instance belonging to the genus Cadophora) comprise small, dark spots in cross sections of the wood, which appear as deep brown or black streaks in longitudinal section (Mugnai et al., 1999; Mondello et al., 2018). In cross section, these spots are sparsely distributed or arranged in groups around an annual growth ring or close to the pith (Mugnai et al., 1999). Symptoms on the leaves consist of light-green or chlorotic spots between the veins, which spread out over time to the distal part of the shoots, become increasingly necrotic and resulting finally in a 'tiger-stripe' pattern. Wilt symptoms are also evident in the crown. Symptoms on the berries comprise minute, dark-brown or purple spots on the skin, which are scattered or distributed in bands. In the later stages of the disease, cracks may form.
In kiwifruit orchards, foliage becomes chlorotic, with spots increasing in size over the year. Leaves wilt and fall prematurely. Fruits are smaller than usual and/or do not reach full maturity. Wood symptoms include wood discolouration and decay (Marco et al., 2000a). In olive trees, branch canker and twig dieback have been described by Úrbez-Torres et al. (2013).
Differentiation between esca proper and Petri disease is only possible on the basis of wood symptoms. In summary, the following syndromes associated with wood discolouration are thought to be caused by P. chlamydospora (and/or P. minimum, and/or other species): brown wood-streaking, wood discolouration of rooted cuttings, slow dieback, black goo and decline of young grapevines (Mugnai et al., 1999; Mondello et al., 2018).
List of Symptoms/Signs
Symptom or sign | Life stages | Sign or diagnosis |
---|---|---|
Plants/Fruit/discoloration | ||
Plants/Fruit/lesions: black or brown | ||
Plants/Fruit/lesions: scab or pitting | ||
Plants/Fruit/mummification | ||
Plants/Fruit/premature drop | ||
Plants/Growing point/dwarfing; stunting | ||
Plants/Leaves/abnormal colours | ||
Plants/Leaves/abnormal leaf fall | ||
Plants/Leaves/necrotic areas | ||
Plants/Leaves/wilting | ||
Plants/Leaves/yellowed or dead | ||
Plants/Stems/discoloration | ||
Plants/Stems/gummosis or resinosis | ||
Plants/Stems/internal discoloration | ||
Plants/Whole plant/discoloration | ||
Plants/Whole plant/plant dead; dieback | ||
Plants/Whole plant/wilt |
Prevention and Control
Prevention
Pathogen free plant material is considered as an essential prevention step incorporated in possible control measures. With somewhat inconclusive results, hot-water treatment (standard approach 50°C for 30 min.) has been tested in the past (Gramaje et al., 2009; Waite et al., 2013).
Control
Research continues on the development of control strategies against esca and Petri diseases. Any development of an effective control strategy for P. chlamydospora (and Phaeoacremonium spp., including P. minimum), depends on significant progress in understanding the biology and epidemiology of these species (Marco et al., 2000b; Gramaje et al., 2018). The effectiveness of control strategies against Petri and esca diseases is hampered by: i) the mostly endophytic character of the causal agents; ii) the time required for foliar symptoms to appear (latent occurrence of pathogens); iii) the uncertain correlation between foliar symptoms and wood deterioration; and iv) the erratic nature of the disease with regard to outer symptoms. No effective curative control measures are known, so proactive measures must be taken and have been intensively discussed over the past few years.
Presently there are two main categories of control used for the disease, each based on pruning wound protection both in young and mature vines: i) chemical treatment with a combination of boscalid / pyraclostrobin as part of a polymer suspension; ii) organic treatment using applications of Trichoderma spp. (Fourie et al., 2001; Halleen and Fourie, 2016; Gramaje et al., 2018). For both types of treatment, application is recommended as being timely with the winter pruning measures in the field. It needs to be noted that winter pruning wounds are susceptible for several weeks under field conditions (Eskalen et al., 2007; Elena and Luque, 2016).
In addition, cultural practices such as minimum pruning, which are thought to reduce losses to the disease and inhibit its spread, have been studied in extended field trials (Kraus et al., 2019). With regard to plant material, proactive measures such as hot-water treatment of plant material (usually 50°C for 30 min) have been conducted in different countries (Crous et al., 2001; Fourie et al., 2001; Rooney and Gubler, 2001; Edwards et al., 2003); however, results remain inconclusive (Whiting et al., 2001; Armengol et al., 2007). A comprehensive overview on the possible control strategies is provided in Gramaje et al. (2018).
In summary, control ideas all are directed to delay the recolonization of grapevine tissues by the causative fungal pathogens, including P. chlamydospora.
Monitoring and Surveillance (incl. remote sensing)
Vineyards under study are annually monitored for external symptoms.
Impact
For a number of centuries, esca and related diseases such as Petri disease have accompanied the history of the vine (Mugnai et al., 1999; Surico, 2000). In recent years, these diseases have reappeared in vineyards all over the world in a more destructive manner than ever before. As a consequence, vineyards have experienced a dramatic shortening of their productive life and increased management costs.
No accurate data is available on the economic impact of esca and Petri diseases. In most European wine-growing countries, these diseases are estimated to have reached incidences of more than 10%. In southern Europe, these diseases are found in all wine-growing regions, affecting 90-100% of vineyards and increasing annually by approximately 5% (Mugnai et al., 1999). Symptoms of Petri disease, assignable to Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and/or Phaeoacremonium aleophilum [P. minimum], are now frequently reported on vines younger than 8-10 years. With the restructuring of vineyards in Europe and elsewhere, an increasing number of young vines have been found to be affected by the disease, often resulting in time-consuming and costly replantation. This has led to the suggestion that the problem is caused, at least partly, by introducing the pathogens to vineyards in pre-infected plant material (Ridgway et al., 2003; Whiteman et al., 2003). Additional measures may, therefore, be necessary to reduce the possible sources of inoculum during grapevine propagation.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © CABI. CABI is a registered EU trademark. This article is published under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
History
Published online: 9 October 2023
Language
English
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
SCITE_
Citations
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
EXPORT CITATIONSExport Citation
View Options
View options
Get Access
Login Options
Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.