Skip the header
Open access
Technical Factsheet
Basic
18 December 2021

Puccinia purpurea (rust (of grasses, sorghum))

Identity

Preferred Scientific Name
Puccinia purpurea Cooke
Preferred Common Name
rust (of grasses, sorghum)
Other Scientific Names
Dicaeoma purpureum (Cooke) Kuntze
Puccinia prunicolor Syd. & E.J. Butler
Puccinia sanguinea Dietel
Puccinia sorghi-halepensis Pat.
Uredo andropogonis-hirti Maire
Uredo sorghi Pass.
International Common Names
Spanish
roya del sorgo
French
rouille du sorgho
Local Common Names
Germany
Rost: Sorghumhirse
EPPO code
PUCCPU (Puccinia purpurea)

Pictures

Maize leaves are covered with pigmented flecks and rust pustules.
Symptoms on maize
Maize leaves are covered with pigmented flecks and rust pustules.
K.H. Anahosur
Rust pustules are parallel to the leaf veins.
Infected maize leaf
Rust pustules are parallel to the leaf veins.
K.H. Anahosur
Pustules are 2-3 mm long.
Infected maize leaf (detail)
Pustules are 2-3 mm long.
K.H. Anahosur
Puccinia purpurea on Sorghum
CABI
Sorghum leaf rust
Puccinia purpurea
Sorghum leaf rust
Scot Nelson
A mass of spores are exposed when the pustule ruptures.
Ruptured rust pustule (detail)
A mass of spores are exposed when the pustule ruptures.
K.H. Anahosur
Urediniospores are 30-42 x 20-30 µm.
Uredinium and urediniospores
Urediniospores are 30-42 x 20-30 µm.
K.H. Anahosur
Teliospores are two-celled and measure 40-60 x 25-32 µm.
Telium and teliospores
Teliospores are two-celled and measure 40-60 x 25-32 µm.
K.H. Anahosur

Distribution

This content is currently unavailable.

Host Plants and Other Plants Affected

Symptoms

The characteristic symptoms are seen on leaves and peduncles. The first symptoms, which are seen on plants aged 1-1.5 months, are purple, red or tan flecks or spots on the leaves. Scattered purple, red or tan flecks appear on both leaf surfaces. The colour depends on the plant pigmentation. The uredinia develop as small, raised, amphigenous pustules at first covered by the brownish epidermal layer that ruptures to expose the reddish to dark chestnut-brown, powdery mass of urediniospores, which are blown away by air currents. Uredinia are elliptical, blister-like or erumpent, up to 2 mm long, and lie parallel to and between the leaf veins. They occur in groups or are scattered. Under favourable disease conditions, when the foliage is completely covered with rust pustules, the entire plant and field look brown. As the disease progresses, some uredinia are converted into telia and teliospores develop. New telia are also produced independently and occur on both leaf surfaces, especially on the lower surface. Telia are blackish, and are elliptical-oblong to linear, up to 3 mm long. When they rupture, a chocolate-brown powdery mass of teliospores is exposed. At this stage, premature drying of foliage is seen. Poor head development and shrivelled grains are also observed. On the peduncle and rachis, reddish-brown to blackish-brown uredinia and telia are seen as long streaks or stripes or narrowly elongated lesions (Ramakrishnan, 1962).

List of Symptoms/Signs

Symptom or signLife stagesSign or diagnosis
Plants/Inflorescence/lesions; flecking; streaks (not Poaceae)  
Plants/Inflorescence/twisting and distortion  
Plants/Leaves/abnormal colours  
Plants/Leaves/fungal growth  
Plants/Seeds/shrivelled  

Prevention and Control

Introduction

P. purpurea needs to be controlled to protect grain and fodder sorghums grown in the cool humid tropical regions of the world. Rust severity may be assessed on a scale from 1 to 5: a severity of 3 or more has been found to be economically important and should be considered as the point to start control measures (Anahosur et al., 1981). Rust control is achieved primarily by cultivating resistant varieties and also by cultivating the slow-rusting sorghum varieties in different countries, including: Southern Africa (Malawi, Swaziland, Zambia and Zimbabwe), East and West Africa, South and Central America and Caribbean basin, Mexico, North America, and Asia (e.g. India, Philippines and Thailand).

Cultural Control and Sanitary Measures

Cultural practices which help the crop to escape the disease (e.g. early sowing) are used in India (Anahosur et al., 1982) and elsewhere (Frederiksen, 1980). Earlier planted sorghum crops essentially escaped the disease, whereas those planted later were devastated (Frederiksen, 1980; Anahosur et al., 1982). Infected residues from both crop and weed hosts should be destroyed, for example, by collecting and burning 'rusted' leaves (Tarr, 1962). Healthy seed should be used for planting: seeds may be treated to prevent seedborne infection from urediniospores present on the surface of seeds. However, the role of seedborne urediniospores in disease transmission is questionable.

Host-Plant Resistance

In regions where rust is an economically important disease, growing less-susceptible or resistant cultivars provides practical control of P. purpurea. Genotypes with generalized or polygenic resistance are widely cultivated. In North America, rust is a naturally stabilized disease (Frederiksen and Rosenow, 1972). The generalized resistance has proven very stable. Slow-rusting lines such as TAM-428 have performed well in North America. In India, screening procedures using urediniospores and evaluation of disease severity with a scale from 1 to 5 have been standardized. Several germplasm lines, varieties, hybrids and R lines have been tested over the years: several are resistant to the disease (Sharma, 1980; Anahosur, 1992; Miller and Prihoda, 1996; Miller et al., 1996; Sotomayor Rios et al., 1996; Palakshappa and Padaganur, 2002; Peterson et al., 2007). Testing several germplasm lines has revealed that the frequency of resistance was greater in 'tan type' sorghums than 'purple types' (Anahosur et al., 1981). Some of the most prominent resistant sources include IS-12610C, 2816C, 12539C, 12564C, 12666C, 3758, 3547, 3443 and 1257. Naik et al. (1981) and Naik and Anahosur (1988) reported that the biochemical basis of disease resistance in sorghum (e.g. TAM 428 and SPV 193) may be attributed to a high quantity of phenols and amino acids and a low level of sugars. Berquist (1971) showed that resistance to rust was inherited as a dominant trait. In India, Patil-Kulkarni et al. (1972) and Rana et al. (1976) argued that susceptibility was the dominant character among the parents they had used. Anahosur (1992) studied various crosses that indicated that resistance is dominant and may be governed by one or two genes. Rana et al. (1982) reported that resistances to leaf rust, downy mildew (Peronosclerospora sorghi) and charcoal rot (Macrophomina phaseolina) are inherited independently. It is possible to combine these traits through selection by choosing rust-resistant plants from segregating F3 progenies which have less than 1% downy mildew susceptibility and 10% charcoal rot susceptibility: a line with multiple resistance is thus selected. Shivanna et al. (1994) reported that inheritance of resistance to zonate leaf spot (Gloeocercospora sorghi), rust and downy mildew was governed by dominant genes and inherited independently. By accepting lines where 90% of plants are resistant to zonate leaf spot and downy mildew, the limit for rust can be fixed (at 80% of plants resistant) to select lines with a high degree of multiple disease resistance. The inherited pattern of disease resistance depended on the combinations of parents studied. Berquist (1974) described two races of P. purpurea. Sorghum variety IS-2814-TSC separated the population into two races whereas Rio (SC-599) was resistant to both the races.

Chemical Control

Due to the variable regulations around (de-)registration of pesticides, we are for the moment not including any specific chemical control recommendations. For further information, we recommend you visit the following resources:
PAN pesticide database (www.pesticideinfo.org)
Your national pesticide guide

Impact

Rust caused by P. purpurea is found in all the sorghum-growing areas of the world. Rust epidemics occur almost yearly in some cool humid regions of Central and South America, South-East Asia and Southern India and reduce forage quality and grain yield. Under favourable conditions for disease, poor panicle exsertion and shrivelled grain caused by rust infection may be responsible for grain yield losses of 65% (Frederiksen, 1986). Rust severity may be assessed on a scale from 1 (no visible symptoms) to 5 (>51% of leaf area covered by rust pustules) (Ravindranath, 1980; Anahosur, 1992).In India, 50% losses in sorghum variety 1188 due to rust have been reported (Sharma and Jain, 1975; Sharma, 1980). In India, in susceptible sorghums, premature death of foliage caused by rust infection under cool, humid conditions affects the grain yield quality (Sharma, 1980; Anahosur, 1981, 1992). Yield losses of 30% have been reported from the Philippines, where control measures were necessary (Tangonan and Dalmacio, 1992). In Thailand, rust prevalence reached moderate severity: grade 2 (Boon-Long, 1992). De Milliano (1992) reported severe epiphytotics in Malawi, Swaziland, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe: control measures were necessary. In east and west Africa, rust appears in severe form in certain years and affects the foliage and grain.In 1977, rust was reported in several humid areas of Mexico such as Tampico, Rio, Bravo, Tamulipas, Nayarit, Veracluz and Jalisco (Vallego, 1980). Berquist (1974) indicated that rust could be a major disease on ratooned sorghum in Hawaii and other places. In the USA the incidence reached severity grade 5 (Frederiksen, 1977). Frederiksen (1980) reported that rust in Argentina, Brazil, and Puerto Rico causes death of the foliage and reduces the grain size. In addition, it predisposes the plants to attack by Fusarium moniliforme [Gibberella fujikuroi] and Macrophomina phaseolina. The severity grade was 4 in South America, 3 in Venezuela and 3 in Colombia: control was required (Teyssandier, 1992). Wall and Meckenstock (1992) reported that in Central America and the Caribbean Basin, rust appears every year and is severe during the dry season. They recorded 5-25% infection and 4% yield loss.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 18 December 2021

Language

English

Authors

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

VIEW ALL METRICS

SCITE_

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

EXPORT CITATIONS

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login Options

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Related Articles

Skip the navigation