Skip the header
Open access
Technical Factsheet
Basic
16 November 2021

Uromyces appendiculatus (bean rust)

Identity

Preferred Scientific Name
Uromyces appendiculatus (Pers.) Unger (1816)
Preferred Common Name
bean rust
Other Scientific Names
Aecidium phaseolorum (DC.) Wallr. (1833)
Caoma appendiculatum Schltdl. (1824)
Caoma phaseoli (Pers.) Nees (1816)
Coeomurus phaseolorum (R. Hedw. ex DC.) Gray (1821)
Erysibe appendiculata (Pers.) Wallr. (1833)
Puccinia phaseoli Rabenh.
Puccinia phaseoli-trilobi Schwein. (1834)
Puccinia phaseolorum R. Hedw. ex DC. (1805)
Uredo appendiculata Pers. (1796)
Uredo appendiculata var. phaseoli Pers. (1801)
Uredo dolichi Berk. & Broome (1875)
Uredo phaseoli (Pers.) F. Strauss (1811)
Uredo phaseolorum DC. (1808)
Uromyces aberrans Dietel (1901)
Uromyces fatouae Henn. (1902)
Uromyces obscurus Dietel & Holw. (1897)
Uromyces phaseoli (Pers.) G. Winter
Uromyces phaseolorum (DC.) de Bary
Uromyces vignae-luteolae Henn. (1907)
International Common Names
English
brown bean rust
rust of beans
rust: bean
Spanish
chahuixtle del frijol
roya de la judia
roya del frijol
French
rouille brune du haricot
rouille de l'haricot
rouille du haricot
Local Common Names
Germany
Rost: Bohne
EPPO code
UROMAP (Uromyces appendiculatus)

Pictures

Uromyces appendiculatus; Symptoms on bean leaf.
Symptoms
Uromyces appendiculatus; Symptoms on bean leaf.
©AgrEvo
Uromyces appendiculatus rust spots on Phaseolus bean leaves.
Symptoms
Uromyces appendiculatus rust spots on Phaseolus bean leaves.
©J.M. Waller/CABI BioScience
Bean rust
Uromyces appendiculatus
Bean rust
Edinah Chemboi
Rust on pole bean leaves
Uromyces appendiculatus
Rust on pole bean leaves
"K.P. Somachandra, Regional Agricultural Research and Development Centre, Sri Lanka"
Bean rust
Uromyces appendiculatus
Bean rust
"Nilanka Herath, Department of Agriculture, Sri Lanka"

Distribution

This content is currently unavailable.

Host Plants and Other Plants Affected

Symptoms

Initial signs of bean rust on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) include fungal sori, seen as small white specks under the leaf epidermis, and rust coloured pustules. These pustules are found mainly on the underside of the leaf and can become surrounded by a circle of chlorosis. Dark lesions ranging from 0.3 to 3.0 mm in diameter may be visible on the leaves. Elongated pustules may appear on pods, stems and petioles. These can become black when teliospores form, usually on older leaves (Liebenberg and Pretorius, 2010). Premature leaf chlorosis, senescence and defoliation have also been reported (Duniway and Durbin, 1971).

List of Symptoms/Signs

Symptom or signLife stagesSign or diagnosis
Plants/Leaves/abnormal colours  
Plants/Leaves/abnormal leaf fall  
Plants/Leaves/fungal growth  
Plants/Leaves/yellowed or dead  

Prevention and Control

Chemical Control

Kale and Anahosur (1996) reported that triadimefon and mancozeb sprays were effective in controlling U. appendiculatus on cowpeas grown at Dharwad, India; diclobutrazol reduced disease spread after one spray application. Gonzalez and Garcia (1996) found that the best results against U. appendiculatus on Phaseolus vulgaris were obtained with bitertanol, hexaconazole and oxycarboxin sprays. No significant differences were found among the treatments, which statistically excelled sulfur and raised yield significantly compared with sulfur. Becerra Leor et al. (1994) reported that in Mexico fungicide treatment applied to susceptible varieties such as Jamapa increased seed yield by >200 kg/ha. Fungicides that gave the best results were hexaconazole, maneb and tebuconazole applied before flowering.

Cultural Control

Grafton et al. (1997) reported that bean cultivar Maverick is homozygous dominant for the resistance gene Ur3, which confers resistance to prevalent races of U. appendiculatus in North Dakota, USA.Rosas et al. (1997) reported that cultivar Tio Canela-75 was resistant to U. appendiculatus and is recommended for low and intermediate altitude <1200 m) bean production regions of Central America.Pedroza et al. (1994) reported that in experiments to determine the effect of five Phaseolus vulgaris cultivars, crop densities, two nitrogen levels and two nitrogen sources on root rot and foliage diseases it was concluded that Amarillo Zaragoza or Bayo Zaragoza at a medium density of 71,000 plants/ha and with low rates of inorganic nitrogen would be the best option when root rot, bacterial blight and rust are the most important diseases.Panse et al. (1997) reported that in tests using a mixture of rust resistant and susceptible plants of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) rust inoculated mixtures containing resistant, intermediate and susceptible genotypes, yield increased by 3.3% compared with the control. In mixtures of P. vulgaris a higher proportion of resistant lines was required, compared with cereals, for comparable reductions in the spread of disease, due to lower plant density and correspondingly higher autodeposition rate of urediospores.Cherian et al. (1996) investigated 18 genotypes of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) which were evaluated for slow rusting (a resistance mechanism) using the genotype C152 (highly susceptible to rust) as a control. Observations for leaf area covered and pustule density were recorded at 2-8 day intervals, starting from the first appearance of rust. Based on logistic and Gompertz growth rates and AUDPC values, several genotypes including V38, APC813, APC83 and V17 were identified as possessing favourable slow rusting behaviour. Fininsa (1996) reported the results of a study on the effect of intercropping P. vulgaris with maize on rust caused by U. appendiculatus under three cropping systems: mixed intercropping, row intercropping and sole cropping of P. vulgaris using five cultivars in a randomized complete block design. Mixed intercropping reduced rust incidence levels on average by 51 and 25% compared with sole cropping and row intercropping, respectively.Kale and Anahosur (1993) found that in a field experiment early sowing dates resulted in a lower disease index and higher yield. Weather conditions were more conducive to disease spread later in the growing season and caused heavy infection at earlier stages of the crop when sowing was delayed. Kelly et al. (1995) reported that P. vulgaris cv. Newport (PI586656) carries the Ur3 gene which conditions resistance to U. appendiculatus race 53 and all indigenous races prevalent in Michigan, USA.

Biological Control

Centurion and Kimati (1994) reported that Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus sp. and Arthrobacter sp. controlled U. appendiculatus on Phaseolus vulgaris by >95% when used as concentrated cell suspensions in aqueous Tween 20 solutions. Low concentration suspensions decreased rust pustule number by >80% using B. subtilis and Bacillus sp. and by 70% using Arthrobacter sp. The B. subtilis and Bacillus sp. isolates as concentrated suspensions partially reduced spore viability of U. appendiculatus. B. subtilis and Arthrobacter sp. reduced rust pustules more in the greenhouse than Bacillus sp. Centurion et al. (1994) studied the antagonists Bacillus sp. isolate B206, B. subtilis AP401 and Arthrobacter sp. B138. In liquid culture the Bacillus isolates reduced the number of bean rust pustules by >95%. Arthrobacter sp. was less efficient, giving a reduction of 65%. The B. subtilis isolate released thermostable substances antagonistic to U. appendiculatus into the culture media; the liquid culture as well as the filtrate and autoclaved culture reduced pustule number by >95%. Isolate B206 was also found to act through thermostable substances released into the medium, but the greatest efficiency was noted when living cells of the antagonist were applied to the plant. Production of antagonistic substances by isolate B206 was affected by NaCl concentration in the medium. Arthrobacter did not act through antibiosis. Mizubuti et al. (1995) found isolates of B. subtilis which, by means of broth culture supernatants, were able to reduce the number of rust pustules; isolates FF-1, FF-5 and FF-6 were selected as potential biocontrol agents.Romero and Carrion (1995) evaluated the pathogenicity of V. lecanii on U. appendiculatus var. appendiculatus, the cause of Phaseolus vulgaris rust disease, and the best time for its application as a biological control agent of rust under greenhouse conditions. The rust infection on P. vulgaris was reduced by between 39 and 52% compared with controls. Pohrenezny et al. (1987) recommended the use of mancozeb + sulfur followed by chlorothalonil for control of rust on beans in Florida, USA.

Impact

If the disease infects at early stages of plant growth the plant may be killed.Gonzalez and Garcia (1996) reported that bean rust in the Velasco zone, the Holguin province, Cuba can cause yield losses reaching 28-54, 8-33 and 13-29% on cultivars ICA-Pijao, Velasco Largo and Bonita 11, respectively, and result in a decrease in the number of pods per plant and the weight of seed. Becerra et al. (1994) reported that in Mexico fungicide treatment applied to susceptible varieties such as Jamapa increased seed yield by >200 kg/ha. Fungicides that gave the best results were hexaconazole, maneb and tebuconazole applied twice before flowering. Lindgren et al. (1995) used a weighted analysis of covariance to estimate yield loss due to rust on Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Pinto UI114 in west-central Nebraska, USA, in a 9 year fungicide efficacy trial. The resulting model fitted the data well (R2=0.94), and the slope over all years had a 19 kg/ha decrease in yield for each 1% increase in severity of rust. A yield response within years occurred only through a reduction in the incidence of rust for most fungicidal treatments.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 16 November 2021

Language

English

Authors

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

VIEW ALL METRICS

SCITE_

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

EXPORT CITATIONS

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login Options

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Related Articles

Skip the navigation