Skip the header
Open access
Technical Factsheet
Basic
16 November 2021

Uromyces viciae-fabae (rust of broad bean)

Identity

Preferred Scientific Name
Uromyces viciae-fabae (Pers.) J. Schröt. (1875)
Preferred Common Name
rust of broad bean
Other Scientific Names
Puccinia fabae Grev. (1863)
Puccinia globosa Grev.
Uredo viciae-fabae Pers. (1801)
Uromyces fabae (Pers.) de Bary (1863)
Uromyces orobi (Pers.) Fuckel (1869)
Uromyces polymorphus Peck & Clint. (1878)
Uromyces viciae Fuckel, 1869
Uromyces yoshinagai Henn. (1901)
International Common Names
English
rust: bean
rust: lentil
rust: vetch
Spanish
chahuixtle del haba
roya de las habas
French
rouille de la feve
rouille du pois
Local Common Names
Germany
Rost: Ackerbohne
Rost: Bohne
Rost: Leguminosen
Rost: Linse
Rost: Wicke
EPPO code
UROMVF (Uromyces viciae-fabae)

Pictures

Uromyces viciae-fabae (rust of broad bean); Lesions formed by pycnidia on the upper surface of a leaf. Switzerland. September 2020.
Symptoms
Uromyces viciae-fabae (rust of broad bean); Lesions formed by pycnidia on the upper surface of a leaf. Switzerland. September 2020.
©CABI (taken by Dr Philip Taylor)
Uromyces viciae-fabae (rust of broad bean); Lesions formed by pycnidia on the upper surface of a leaf. Switzerland. September 2020.
Symptoms
Uromyces viciae-fabae (rust of broad bean); Lesions formed by pycnidia on the upper surface of a leaf. Switzerland. September 2020.
©CABI (taken by Dr Philip Taylor)
Uromyces viciae-fabae (rust of broad bean); Lesions formed by aecia on the lower surface of a leaf. Switzerland. September 2020.
Symptoms
Uromyces viciae-fabae (rust of broad bean); Lesions formed by aecia on the lower surface of a leaf. Switzerland. September 2020.
©CABI (taken by Dr Philip Taylor)
Uromyces viciae-fabae (rust of broad bean); Lesions formed by aecia viewed under light microscope. Switzerland. September 2020.
Symptoms
Uromyces viciae-fabae (rust of broad bean); Lesions formed by aecia viewed under light microscope. Switzerland. September 2020.
©CABI (taken by Dr Philip Taylor)
Uredia of U. viciae-fabae.
Uredia
Uredia of U. viciae-fabae.
M. Fawaz Azmeh/University of Damascus
Uredia of U. viciae-fabae. Note secondary pustules.
Uredia
Uredia of U. viciae-fabae. Note secondary pustules.
M. Fawaz Azmeh/University of Damascus
Uromyces viciae-fabae (rust of broad bean); Rust pustules on bean leaves
Symptoms
Uromyces viciae-fabae (rust of broad bean); Rust pustules on bean leaves
©AgrEvo
Telia (telial sori) of U. viciae-fabae on stem and petioles of Vicia faba.
Telia
Telia (telial sori) of U. viciae-fabae on stem and petioles of Vicia faba.
M. Fawaz Azmeh/University of Damascus
Uredia and telia of U. viciae-fabae on stem of Vicia faba.
Uredia and telia
Uredia and telia of U. viciae-fabae on stem of Vicia faba.
M. Fawaz Azmeh/University of Damascus
Uromyces viciae-fabae (rust of broad bean); Aeciospores from faba bean. Switzerland. September 2020.
Aeciospores
Uromyces viciae-fabae (rust of broad bean); Aeciospores from faba bean. Switzerland. September 2020.
©CABI (taken by Dr Philip Taylor)
Uromyces viciae-fabae (rust of broad bean); Symptoms on bean leaves
Symptoms
Uromyces viciae-fabae (rust of broad bean); Symptoms on bean leaves
©AgrEvo
Uromyces viciae-fabae (rust of broad bean); Uredospores
Uredospores
Uromyces viciae-fabae (rust of broad bean); Uredospores
M. Fawaz Azmeh/University of Damascus
Uromyces viciae-fabae (rust of broad bean); Teliospores
Teliospores
Uromyces viciae-fabae (rust of broad bean); Teliospores
M. Fawaz Azmeh/University of Damascus

Distribution

This content is currently unavailable.

Host Plants and Other Plants Affected

Symptoms

U. viciae-fabae causes rust on leaves and stems of broad bean, pea, vetch and lentil, causing partial defoliation of susceptible varieties.

List of Symptoms/Signs

Symptom or signLife stagesSign or diagnosis
Plants/Leaves/abnormal leaf fall  
Plants/Leaves/fungal growth  

Prevention and Control

Chemical Control

Singh and Singh (1997) reported results of nine fungicide treatments for the control of pea rust caused by U. viciae-fabae comprising a first spray of fungicides applied just after the appearance of symptoms, followed by two more sprays at 10-day intervals. Flutriafol was the most effective fungicide giving 74.7% disease control and increased the grain yield of pea. From the pooled data from two seasons it was concluded that three sprays of flutriafol, metalaxyl or tridemorph could be recommended for the management of pea rust. Khaled et al. (1995) reported that spraying faba bean with mancozeb was most effective in reducing leaf spots and rust disease severity.Marcellos et al. (1995) found that mancozeb and tebuconazole were effective in reducing the severity of diseases on faba beans.Dobson and Giltrap (1991) reported that chlorothalonil-containing mixtures gave comparable control of rust and yield responses at low to moderate infection pressure to those obtained with fenpropimorph. Under high disease pressure, fenpropimorph was superior to chlorothalonil in terms of rust control and yield in faba beans.Mansour (1980) reported that U. viciae-fabae, which causes serious damage to faba beans in Egypt, was controlled with sprays of oxycarboxin, triforine, chlorothalonil and mancozeb, and yields were increased; mancozeb + 0.05% Triton B 1956 was significantly superior to the other treatments.

Cultural Control

Bhardwaj and Sharma (1996) reported that the percentage disease index of U. viciae-fabae on peas was lowest in 15th October sowing followed by 30th September sowings (compared with early September or late October sowings) in Himachal Pradesh, India. However, Singh et al. (1996) reported that in Madhya Pradesh a mean seed yield of 2.23, 1.80, 1.29 and 0.61 was obtained for sowing on 5 October, 25 October, 14 November and 4 December, respectively. The incidence of rust increased as sowing was delayed.Use of the lentil cultivar Masoor 93, derived from a cross between ILL4400 (Syrian variety) and 18-12 (Indian variety), was recommended because of it's high yield potential (3843 kg/ha), wide adaptability and high resistance to rust.Chauhan and Singh (1994) reported that severity of infection by U. viciae-fabae on pea and pustules/plant increased progressively with an increase in the duration of leaf wetness up to 24 h, but did not increase further significantly. Both were high at 20°C under greenhouse and laboratory conditions. It was suggested that the observed relationship between severity of pea rust and duration of leaf wetness at 20°C may be useful in predicting disease outbreaks if an initial inoculum is present. Rashid and Bernier (1991) found rust yield losses of only 1-2% in the slow-rusting population cultivar 2N43, of 1-11% in slow-rusting populations from cultivar Erfordia and cultivar Diana, and of 6-43% in other slow-rusting populations, indicating that some slow-rusting populations of Vicia faba are more tolerant to rust than others. Conner and Bernier (1982b) suggested that native plant species may have an important role in the epidemiology of rust on Vicia, Lathyrus and Pisum.

Impact

Marcellos et al. (1995) estimated that rust in Vicia faba accounted for yield loss mainly by reducing seed size. Application of mancozeb early and during late flowering provided an effective and economical increase in grain yield.Sache and Zadoks (1995) suggested that the effect of U. viciae-fabae rust on yield components of V. faba could be predicted by a critical point model using disease severity assessed on the middle or bottom canopy layer in the mid-flowering stage. Rust severity >5% during that critical stage would substantially decrease final yield and fungicide spraying against rust would be advised.Lapwood et al. (1984) reported results on the effect of U. viciae-fabae on the yield of spring-sown V. faba in the UK. Fungicide sprays of maneb + mancozeb (protective) or propiconazole (systemic) applied two or three times to control rust (with a no fungicide control) resulted in overall yields of 4.51 and 5.43 t/ha in unsprayed and sprayed treatments, respectively. The difference was accounted for by the weight of individual grains and not by the number of pods/plant or grains/pod.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 16 November 2021

Language

English

Authors

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

VIEW ALL METRICS

SCITE_

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

EXPORT CITATIONS

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login Options

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Related Articles

Skip the navigation