Didymella rabiei (chick pea blight)
Identity
- Preferred Scientific Name
- Didymella rabiei (Kovatsch.) Arx
- Preferred Common Name
- chick pea blight
- Other Scientific Names
- Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Labr.
- Mycosphaerella rabiei Kovatsch.
- Phyllosticta cicerina Prillinger & Delacr. (1893)
- Phyllosticta rabiei (Pass.) Trotter
- Zythia rabiei Pass.
- International Common Names
- Englishblight: chickpeagram blight
- Spanishrabia del garbanzo
- Frenchascochyta du pois chiche
Pictures
Distribution
Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
Host | Host status | References |
---|---|---|
Cicer arietinum (chickpea) | Main | Galloway and MacLeod (2003) |
Medicago sativa (lucerne) | Other | |
Pisum sativum (pea) | Other | |
Trifolium alexandrinum (Berseem clover) | Other | |
Vigna unguiculata (cowpea) | Other |
Symptoms
Symptoms can occur on all aerial parts of the plant and disease in the field is often seen as patches of dead blighted plants (Chen et al., 2011). Circular, initially dark-brown, necrotic lesions appear on leaflets extending to a general blighting of the foliage under cool wet conditions. Older lesions develop a grey centre in which dark pynidia of the pathogen may be seen, often arranged in concentric rings in older lesions. Lesions on petioles and stems are elongated or oval; they frequently girdle the stem causing a wilting and dieback of distal regions of leaves and stems. Basal stem lesions can cause rapid death of the whole plant. Stems often break after girdling by the pathogen. Lesions on pods are circular with a pale centre developing concentric rings of pycnidia and infected seeds show discoloured patches.
List of Symptoms/Signs
Symptom or sign | Life stages | Sign or diagnosis |
---|---|---|
Plants/Fruit/lesions: black or brown | ||
Plants/Leaves/necrotic areas | ||
Plants/Leaves/yellowed or dead | ||
Plants/Seeds/discolorations | ||
Plants/Seeds/lesions on seeds | ||
Plants/Stems/dieback | ||
Plants/Stems/discoloration of bark | ||
Plants/Whole plant/plant dead; dieback | ||
Plants/Whole plant/seedling blight |
Prevention and Control
Current control of the disease is primarily through the use of partially resistant varieties coupled with the use of cultural control techniques such as rotation or deep ploughing to remove crop residues as a source of inoculum (Wise et al., 2009). Seed applied fungicides can be used to eradicate seedborne inoculum. The use of disease resistant cultivars is preferable (Singh et al., 1981; Chen et al., 2004), but resistance is incomplete and the variability of the pathogen makes resistance unreliable in many areas. Combining partial resistance with the application of fungicides such as chlorothalonil and strobilurins has been advocated (Reddy and Singh, 1990a; Banniza et al., 2011). Much effort has been put into screening and breeding chickpea cultivars with adequate resistance. Because of the major influence of environmental conditions on the disease, the standardization of screening methods is particularly important (Haware et al., 1995). The use of blight resistance in the ICARDA chickpea improvement programme has been reviewed by Singh and Reddy (1996). An integrated approach to control combining phytosanitary measures and seed-applied fungicides to reduce inoculum pressure, with partial resistance to the disease is generally recommended (Kaiser and Hannan, 1988; Chen et al., 2011).
Impact
As outlined in Biology and Ecology the disease is endemic in many West Asian and North African countries and under the cool wet conditions which often occur during the main growth period of winter sown Kabuli chickpeas, damaging epidemics occur which can virtually wipe out susceptible varieties. Actual losses incurred at any one time depend on the prevailing weather conditions, the relative susceptibility of the variety grown to the local pathogen population and inoculum pressure; a figure for overall losses across the regions where the diseases is endemic is difficult to estimate (Saxena and Singh, 1984; Reddy and Singh, 1990b).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © CABI. CABI is a registered EU trademark. This article is published under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
History
Published online: 17 November 2021
Language
English
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
SCITE_
Citations
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
EXPORT CITATIONSExport Citation
View Options
View options
Get Access
Login Options
Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.