Phytophthora colocasiae (taro leaf blight)
Identity
- Preferred Scientific Name
- Phytophthora colocasiae Racib.
- Preferred Common Name
- taro leaf blight
- International Common Names
- Englishblight of dasheenleaf blight of Colocasia spp.leaf blight of gabiPhytophthora leaf blight
- Frenchflétrissure des feuilles de taro
- Chineseyu yi ping
- EPPO Code
- PHYTOO
Pictures
Distribution
Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
Host | Host status | References |
---|---|---|
Alocasia macrorrhizos (giant taro) | Other | Singh et al. (2012) |
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius | Other | Singh et al. (2012) |
Araceae | Main | |
Bougainvillea spectabilis (great bougainvillea) | Wild host | |
Catharanthus roseus (Madagascar periwinkle) | Other | Singh et al. (2012) |
Colocasia esculenta (taro) | Main | Martin and Tooley (2004), Lin and Ko (2008), Zeng et al. (2009), Bandyopadhyay et al. (2011), Omane et al. (2012), Nath et al. (2013), Baysal-Gurel and Cinar (2015), Hassan et al. (2021) |
Dracontium polyphyllum | Other | Singh et al. (2012) |
Hevea brasiliensis (rubber) | Other | Singh et al. (2012) |
Panax quinquefolius (American ginseng) | Other | Singh et al. (2012) |
Piper betle (betel pepper) | Other | Singh et al. (2012) |
Piper nigrum (black pepper) | Other | Singh et al. (2012) |
Ricinus communis (castor bean) | Other | Singh et al. (2012) |
Xanthosoma (cocoyam) | Other |
Symptoms
Upper leaves are first affected, showing small brown to olive-green flecks or as spots surrounded by light green or yellow tissue around lesions which enlarge rapidly and turn purplish brown with yellowish margins. The lesions frequently form concentric zones and exude drops of yellowish/reddish-brown liquid which develop into dark brown, hard pellets as they dry; these pellets can contain spores. Some of the diseased tissues may be covered with a powdery white ring consisting of sporangia. The lesions (mostly along the leaf margin) continue to expand and frequently coalesce, as the disease progresses. Holes of irregular size and shape occur on the affected leaves, as the diseased tissues disintegrate and infected leaves collapse within 20 days of unfurling. With severe disease incidence the normal 6-7 leaves per plant are reduced to 3-4 leaves per plant. During dry weather and on some taro cultivars, a yellow halo can surround the lesions; dry weather also slows down lesion expansion (Carmichael et al., 2008; Nelson et al., 2011; Singh et al., 2012).
Petiole infection can occur in susceptible taro cultivars and is evident by the presence of lesions which expand and may produce a reddish-orange exudate. Generally petioles collapse as the leaf blade is destroyed. Corms can also be infected, commonly in very susceptible cultivars. In the early stages of the disease, corm tissue is light brown and soft/rubbery, but in the advanced stages of rot the affected tissue turns brown to purplish (Carmichael et al., 2008; Nelson et al., 2011; Singh et al., 2012).
List of Symptoms/Signs
Symptom or sign | Life stages | Sign or diagnosis |
---|---|---|
Plants/Leaves/abnormal colours | ||
Plants/Leaves/fungal growth | ||
Plants/Leaves/necrotic areas | ||
Plants/Stems/mould growth on lesion | ||
Plants/Vegetative organs/soft rot | ||
Plants/Vegetative organs/surface lesions or discoloration |
Prevention and Control
Prevention
SPS measures
The spread of P. colocasiae between countries can be controlled through quarantine and biosecurity (SPS) measures (see Detection and Inspection). Quarantine measures were used to control the spread of P. colocasiae between the two islands of Samoa (Hunter et al., 1998).
Public awareness
In Samoa, a public awareness campaign (radio, television, videos and print media) was conducted to coincide with the spraying and quarantine measures. Information on disease symptoms, epidemiology including disease spread, disease control and effects on taro production were provided. However, there was no assessment as to the impact of this awareness campaign (Hunter et al.,1998). A study carried out in Nsukka, Nigeria recommended that extension agents should focus on an awareness amongst farmers of TLB disease (Ayogu et al., 2015).
Control
Host-Plant Resistance
Resistance has been identified in germplasm collections of several countries where TLB has been present for a long time, including the Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and India (Ivancic and Lebot, 2000). Screening of germplasm from Palau revealed over 20 taro varieties with resistance to TLB (Singh et al., 2012). Several countries have embarked on breeding programmes which basically involve crossing resistant varieties with superior (high yielding and tasting) local taro varieties. In Samoa, farmers selected clones derived from crosses between initially local (Samoan) cultivars and those from Palau and the Federated States of Micronesia. Further improvement of resistance was achieved by introducing Asian varieties into the programme (Iosefa et al., 2012). This programme enabled the restoration of the Samoan taro export market which had been destroyed by taro leaf blight in the early 1990s.
Four varieties of taro, with the desirable qualities of some traditional Hawaiian landraces, were identified as high yielding and disease-resistant in Hawaii after multi-year, multi-location field trials. DNA fingerprints of the new genotypes distinguish them from the traditional landraces (Paudel et al., 2023). In Vanuatu, genotypes from the two major gene pools (Asia and Pacific) were combined to generate a wide genetic base (Lebot et al., 2003). Fourteen countries from America, Africa, Asia and the Pacific evaluated a selection of 50 indexed genotypes in vitro representing significant genetic diversity. On-station trials led to the distribution of best genotypes to farmers. Introduced genotypes were successfully crossed (controlled crossing) with local cultivars and new hybrids were produced. Seeds of these hybrids were shared internationally providing significant allelic diversity in different countries (Lebot et al., 2018).
Fiji is still free of taro leaf blight but remains vulnerable to the disease due to its location, climatic conditions, increasing trade, sea and air travel to other Pacific Island countries. Taro is one of the major export commodities and is vital for food security and livelihoods. Taro varieties, resistant to the disease, have been developed in an effort to prepare farmers should the disease appear in Fiji.
Cultural Control
Cultural practices, such as removal of infected leaves during the early stages of disease development, tend to be more effective in small plantings, such as subsistence taro gardens (Putter, 1976). Other cultural practices include wide spacing of plants to reduce spread of disease, using sites surrounded by forest as a barrier to disease spread, isolation of new crops from those that are diseased, and the use of planting material free from disease. Intercropping of taro with other crops may help in reducing disease. Taro intercropped with sorghum and pearl millet as a single row or double rows was shown to be more effective than intercropping with okra and maize in managing the disease (Sugha and Gurung, 2006). Disease severity was found to be consistently higher in taro mono-cropping than in a taro/maize intercropping system (Amosa and Wati, 1997). Knowledge of P. colocasiae and the conditions that favour its proliferation can assist in managing the disease, for example, some professional taro growers in Thailand avoid serious TLB infections by planting during the dry season (Singh et al., 2012).
Biological Control
Biological control agents can have some impact on the disease. The fungus Trichoderma has shown promise as a biocontrol agent during in vitro and in vivo studies, with the most potent strain being Trichoderma harzianum (Moïse et al., 2018). Rhizobacteria strains have also been shown to be effective, significantly suppressing the growth of P. colocasiae in greenhouse trials (Kelbessa et al., 2022). Essential oils, for example, cinnamon oil, inhibited mycelial growth, zoospore germination and sporulation of the fungus and also leaf necrosis under laboratory conditions (Hong et al., 2021). Citrus aurantiifolia essential oil has also been shown to have an inhibitory effect on mycelial growth, sporangium production and leaf necrosis under laboratory conditions (Tchameni et al., 2018).
Chemical Control
Due to the variable regulations around (de-)registration of pesticides, we are for the moment not including any specific chemical control recommendations. For further information, we recommend you visit the following resources:
•
EU pesticides database (http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/eu-pesticides-database/)
•
PAN pesticide database (www.pesticideinfo.org)
•
Your national pesticide guide
Impact
This disease can lead to a 30-40% crop loss in heavily infected taro fields (Jackson et al., 1975). The fungus is widespread in South-East Asia and parts of Oceania, where it causes severe leaf damage and considerable loss of corm yield. For example, in the British Solomon Islands, it has been reported to be a limiting factor on taro production (Barrau, 1958; Plucknett et al., 1970). In the Philippines, yield reductions ranged from 24.4% in resistant to 36.5% in susceptible cultivars (Vasguez, 1990). The fungus is capable of infecting undamaged corm tissues under conditions of high humidity resulting in severe corm decay in the storage stage.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © CABI. CABI is a registered EU trademark. This article is published under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
History
Published online: 28 December 2023
Language
English
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
SCITE_
Citations
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
EXPORT CITATIONSExport Citation
View Options
View options
Get Access
Login Options
Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.