Skip the header
Open access
Technical Factsheet
Basic
4 October 2022

Phytophthora lateralis (Port-Orford-cedar root disease)

Identity

Preferred Scientific Name
Phytophthora lateralis Tucker & Milbrath 1942
Preferred Common Name
Port-Orford-cedar root disease
International Common Names
English
Lawson's cypress root disease
Local Common Names
Germany
Wurzelfaeule: Scheinzypresse
EPPO code
PHYTLA (Phytophthora lateralis)

Pictures

Phytophthora lateralis (Port-Orford-cedar root disease); Pointing out discolored inner bark caused by Phytophthora lateralis root disease. Bandon, Oregon, USA. August 1965.
Symptoms
Phytophthora lateralis (Port-Orford-cedar root disease); Pointing out discolored inner bark caused by Phytophthora lateralis root disease. Bandon, Oregon, USA. August 1965.
Public Domain - Released by USDA Forest Service, Region 6, State and Private Forestry, Forest Health Protection/via Flickr - CC0
Phytophthora lateralis (Port-Orford-cedar root disease); Lesion on Port Orford cedar infected with Phytophthora lateralis root disease. Page Mountain, Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest, Oregon, USA. Photo by Richard Sniezko. August 2003.
Symptoms
Phytophthora lateralis (Port-Orford-cedar root disease); Lesion on Port Orford cedar infected with Phytophthora lateralis root disease. Page Mountain, Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest, Oregon, USA. Photo by Richard Sniezko. August 2003.
Public Domain - Released by USDA Forest Service, Region 6, Umpqua National Forest, Dorena Genetic Resource Center/via Flickr - CC0
Phytophthora lateralis (Port-Orford-cedar root disease); Young Port Orford cedars killed by Phytophthora lateralis root disease. Camas Valley planting site, BLM Roseburg District, Oregon, USA. Photo by Richard Sniezko. August 2005.
Symptoms
Phytophthora lateralis (Port-Orford-cedar root disease); Young Port Orford cedars killed by Phytophthora lateralis root disease. Camas Valley planting site, BLM Roseburg District, Oregon, USA. Photo by Richard Sniezko. August 2005.
Public Domain - Released by USDA Forest Service, Region 6, Umpqua National Forest, Dorena Genetic Resource Center/via Flickr - CC0
Phytophthora lateralis (Port-Orford-cedar root disease); Port Orford cedar killed by Phytophthora lateralis root disease. Photo by Richard Sniezko. 2004.
Symptoms
Phytophthora lateralis (Port-Orford-cedar root disease); Port Orford cedar killed by Phytophthora lateralis root disease. Photo by Richard Sniezko. 2004.
Public Domain - Released by USDA Forest Service, Region 6, Umpqua National Forest, Dorena Genetic Resource Center/via Flickr - CC0
Phytophthora lateralis (Port-Orford-cedar root disease); Port Orford cedar killed by Phytophthora lateralis root disease. Powers Ranger District, Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest, Oregon, USA. Photo by Richard Sniezko. June 2003.
Symptoms
Phytophthora lateralis (Port-Orford-cedar root disease); Port Orford cedar killed by Phytophthora lateralis root disease. Powers Ranger District, Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest, Oregon, USA. Photo by Richard Sniezko. June 2003.
Public Domain - Released by USDA Forest Service, Region 6, Umpqua National Forest, Dorena Genetic Resource Center/via Flickr - CC0
Phytophthora lateralis (Port-Orford-cedar root disease); Port Orford cedar killed by Phytophthora lateralis root disease. Page Mountain area. Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest. Photo by Richard Sniezko. June 2004.
Symptoms
Phytophthora lateralis (Port-Orford-cedar root disease); Port Orford cedar killed by Phytophthora lateralis root disease. Page Mountain area. Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest. Photo by Richard Sniezko. June 2004.
Public Domain - Released by USDA Forest Service, Region 6, Umpqua National Forest, Dorena Genetic Resource Center/via Flickr - CC0
Phytophthora lateralis (Port-Orford-cedar root disease); Dead outer branch of Port Orford cedar infected with Phytophthora lateralis. Photo by Richard Sniezko. June 2003.
Symptoms
Phytophthora lateralis (Port-Orford-cedar root disease); Dead outer branch of Port Orford cedar infected with Phytophthora lateralis. Photo by Richard Sniezko. June 2003.
Public Domain - Released by USDA Forest Service, Region 6, Umpqua National Forest, Dorena Genetic Resource Center/via Flickr - CC0
Phytophthora lateralis (Port-Orford-cedar root disease); Port Orford cedar stump killed by Phytophthora lateralis root disease. Hickerson farm, Oregon, USA. Photo by Richard Sniezko. June 2003.
Control
Phytophthora lateralis (Port-Orford-cedar root disease); Port Orford cedar stump killed by Phytophthora lateralis root disease. Hickerson farm, Oregon, USA. Photo by Richard Sniezko. June 2003.
Public Domain - Released by USDA Forest Service, Region 6, Umpqua National Forest, Dorena Genetic Resource Center/via Flickr - CC0
Donald Owen, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, bugwood.org
Phytophthora lateralis
Donald Owen, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Donald Owen, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, bugwood.org
Phytophthora lateralis
Donald Owen, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html

Distribution

This content is currently unavailable.

Host Plants and Other Plants Affected

Symptoms

The crown colour of trees dying from root infection changes uniformly from healthy green to red and brown in one or two years (Trione, 1959). P. lateralis colonizes and kills the inner bark (phloem) tissues of roots and stems of infected trees. Healthy inner bark of C. lawsoniana is white whereas necrotic tissues are red-brown, and there is usually a distinct demarcation between healthy and diseased tissues (Betlejewski et al., 2011; Hansen, 2011). Outer bark is red-brown on both healthy and diseased trees, and wood remains white regardless of infection. On some seedlings and saplings healthy outer bark may still be green, and diseased outer bark may turn red-brown. Necrotic inner bark is not a specific symptom for P. lateralis, however, and P. cinnamomi and P. cambivora cause similar symptoms in Port Orford cedar (C. lawsoniana).

List of Symptoms/Signs

Symptom or signLife stagesSign or diagnosis
Plants/Leaves/abnormal colours  
Plants/Leaves/necrotic areas  
Plants/Leaves/yellowed or dead  
Plants/Roots/cortex with lesions  
Plants/Roots/reduced root system  
Plants/Stems/discoloration of bark  
Plants/Stems/necrosis  
Plants/Whole plant/discoloration  
Plants/Whole plant/early senescence  
Plants/Whole plant/plant dead; dieback  
Plants/Whole plant/seedling blight  
Plants/Whole plant/wilt  

Prevention and Control

Prevention

As with most invasive pathogens, the key to disease control is to prevent establishment in the first place (Greenup, 1998; Hansen, 2008). For soil/root borne Phytophthoras, this means identifying sources of inoculum and blocking the transport of potentially infested materials from those sources. With P. lateralis in landscape situations, this requires inspection and regulation of nursery stock before sale and transport. This tree is readily propagated locally from vegetative material or seeds and so there is no need for its international trade, which risks further introductions of P. lateralis.
In regions where the disease is already locally established, efforts must be concentrated on containment of the pathogen, blocking transport, via soil or on contaminated equipment, to uninfested areas. Early detection of new infestations is important for containment success. Once established, there is little chance for eradication; eradication efforts also risk aggravating the situation by moving infested soil. With time in host-free conditions (about ten years), the pathogen will die out (Hansen and Hamm, 1996).
In vulnerable areas of forests in western United States where P. lateralis is already broadly established, management of Port Orford cedar (POC) root disease is focussed on stopping further spread and providing special protection for the remaining uninfested stands of POC. This has led to permanent or seasonal closure of many roads which might provide pathways for vehicular transport of the pathogen, as well as systematic efforts to reduce the population of P. lateralis in infested areas as a means to lower the probability of its further transport (USDA, 2004). Young cedars which have naturally regenerated next to roads are at great risk. Their systematic removal, locally termed ‘sanitation’, reduces the risk of further disease increase should the pathogen be introduced to the area (Goheen et al., 2012). P. lateralis is a poor saprophytic competitor and dies quickly in the surface soil in the absence of host roots.
In addition to road closures and roadside sanitation, equipment washing requirements are invoked as appropriate to protect healthy areas. High pressure hoses effectively remove mud from vehicles. Water alone is sufficient so long as soil is removed; steam cleaning or the use of biocides is not necessary. Care must be taken to insure that contaminated wash water flows off the road and back into already diseased areas or into host-free areas (Goheen et al., 2012).

Physical Control

When disease is established in an area, the challenge is then to protect nearby cedars from further spread of the pathogen. The main strategy is to identify trees that can be saved and prevent the transport of P. lateralis to them via either soil or water. Trees growing with roots intertwined with an infected tree, or growing downslope along a waterway, may already be infected and probably cannot be saved. Cutting the most vulnerable cedars to create a gap between infected trees and those to be saved may be effective if care is taken to prevent soil disturbance. P. lateralis is a poor saprophytic competitor and will not spread through a dead root system. Mulching cut trees and using the chips in landscaping risks spreading POC root disease; unless the chips are properly composted at elevated temperatures, P. lateralis will survive in contaminated mulch and spread.
In windy areas where wind spread and foliar infection by P. lateralis are evident, the challenge is still greater. In some situations it may be possible to cut trees with foliar infection, removing the above ground source of aerial inoculum. Pruning low hanging branches may prevent initial foliar infection from soil splash.

Chemical Control

Due to the variable regulations around (de-)registration of pesticides, we are for the moment not including any specific chemical control recommendations. For further information, we recommend you visit the following resources:
PAN pesticide database (www.pesticideinfo.org)
Your national pesticide guide

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 4 October 2022

Language

English

Authors

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

VIEW ALL METRICS

SCITE_

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

EXPORT CITATIONS

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login Options

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Related Articles

Skip the navigation