Next Article in Journal
Composition of Essential Oils from Roots and Aerial Parts of Carpesium cernuum and Their Antibacterial and Cytotoxic Activities
Previous Article in Journal
Phenolic Compounds and Bioactive Properties of Ruscus aculeatus L. (Asparagaceae): The Pharmacological Potential of an Underexploited Subshrub
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 7
10.3390/molecules26071884
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Secondary Metabolites of the Genus Amycolatopsis: Structures, Bioactivities and Biosynthesis

by
Zhiqiang Song
,
Tangchang Xu
,
Junfei Wang
,
Yage Hou
,
Chuansheng Liu
,
Sisi Liu
and
Shaohua Wu
*
Yunnan Institute of Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(7), 1884; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26071884
Submission received: 24 February 2021 / Revised: 18 March 2021 / Accepted: 23 March 2021 / Published: 26 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical Biology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Actinomycetes are regarded as important sources for the generation of various bioactive secondary metabolites with rich chemical and bioactive diversities. Amycolatopsis falls under the rare actinomycete genus with the potential to produce antibiotics. In this review, all literatures were searched in the Web of Science, Google Scholar and PubMed up to March 2021. The keywords used in the search strategy were “Amycolatopsis”, “secondary metabolite”, “new or novel compound”, “bioactivity”, “biosynthetic pathway” and “derivatives”. The objective in this review is to summarize the chemical structures and biological activities of secondary metabolites from the genus Amycolatopsis. A total of 159 compounds derived from 8 known and 18 unidentified species are summarized in this paper. These secondary metabolites are mainly categorized into polyphenols, linear polyketides, macrolides, macrolactams, thiazolyl peptides, cyclic peptides, glycopeptides, amide and amino derivatives, glycoside derivatives, enediyne derivatives and sesquiterpenes. Meanwhile, they mainly showed unique antimicrobial, anti-cancer, antioxidant, anti-hyperglycemic, and enzyme inhibition activities. In addition, the biosynthetic pathways of several potent bioactive compounds and derivatives are included and the prospect of the chemical substances obtained from Amycolatopsis is also discussed to provide ideas for their implementation in the field of therapeutics and drug discovery.

1. Introduction

Antibiotics produced by microorganisms have made a significant contribution to human health. Among them, Actinomycetes are the most important sources for drug lead compounds. However, researchers have been turned to rare Actinomycetes to develop novel antibiotics with the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria [1]. In 1986, Lechevalier et al. defined Amycolatopsis as a new genus to accommodate nocardioform Actinomycetes having type IV cell wall composition and lacking mycolic acids [2]. Up to now, by searching in the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature website (http://www.bacterio.net, accessed on 20 September 2020), this genus covered 94 verified species and 4 subspecies, and forms a unique branch in the evolutionary tree of Pseudonocardiaceae. Among 26 species covered in this review, most of them colonize in a wide variety of soil and a few species survival in terrestrial (insect, lichen, island, plant) and marine (sponge, sediment) environment. The various habitats allow Amycolatopsis to produce abundant secondary metabolites.
The genus Amycolatopsis is regarded as an important source of diverse valuable bioactive natural products covering many antibiotics [3]. The most notable antibiotics produced by Amycolatopsis strains include rifamycin [4] and vancomycin [5]. In the early 1950s, vancomycin had been first extracted from Amycolatopsis orientalis that was originally regarded as Streptomyces orientalis [6]. Vancomycin was introduced for clinical use in 1958 and sparsely used during the first 30 years of its introduction, due to its fewer advantages over semisynthetic antibiotics like penicillin, cephalosporin, lincomycin, and fluoroquinolones. Later, the complex chemical structure of vancomycin was ultimately described in 1983 [7]. The genes of OxyB, OxyA and OxyC, encoding three cytochrome P450 enzymes, have been proven to play an important role in three aromatic cross-links of vancomycin in that order [8]. The discovery of X-domain demonstrated the role of OxyA and OxyB, which introduce bisaryl ether linkages with the help of X-domain; however, the mechanism of final crosslink of the biaryl bond installed by OxyC has not been found yet [9]. In 1959, rifamycin was isolated from Amycolatopsis mediterranei, which was the first group of antimicrobials targeting RNA polymerase. The genes of RifZ and RifQ were crucial regulatory factors of rifamycin biosynthesis. RifZ directly regulated transcription of all operons within the rifamycin biosynthesis gene cluster [10]. RifQ inhibited the export of rifamycin B and inactivating it could increase the yield of rifamycin B without affecting the growth of the A. mediterranei [11]. The understanding of metabolite biosynthesis is helpful to the rational operation of biosynthetic pathways, so as to achieve the goal of producing new natural antibiotics. At present, there are few studies on the biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites of Amycolatopsis [12]. We believe that outstanding bioactive compounds from Amycolatopsis deserve to be further researched on the mechanism of action, biosynthesis and regulatory genes. Some Amycolatopsis species have also been demonstrated to possess great potential in degrading plastics, treating heavy metals, and biotransformation. Herein, we describe a detailed summary about the chemical structures and bioactivities of secondary metabolites from Amycolatopsis reported during 1990–2020 by searching in the Web of Science, Google Scholar and PubMed. In addition, the biosynthetic pathways of several potent bioactive compounds and the derivatives of secondary metabolites via chemical synthesis, semi-synthesis and biosynthesis are also described in this paper.

2. Secondary Metabolites from the Genus Amycolatopsis

Secondary metabolites from Amycolatopsis are classified into polyphenols, linear polyketides, macrolides, macrolactams, thiazolyl peptides, cyclic peptides, glycopeptides, amide and amino derivatives, glycoside derivatives, enediyne derivatives and sesquiterpenes, which are all shown in Table 1.

2.1. Polyphenols

Polyphenolic compounds are a large family of natural products and some of them show a series of excellent function in health [56], such as anti-allergenic, anti-inflammatory, anti-microbial, antioxidant, antithrombotic, cardio protective, and vasodilatory effects [57]. The investigation on secondary metabolites of Amycolatopsis sp. ML630-mF1 from the soil sample collected in Toba of Japan led to the isolation of five new compounds named kigamicins A–E (1–5). These compounds showed potent effects to resist methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with the IC50 values ranging in 0.03–0.22 µM. Besides, they inhibited PANC-1 cell survival under a nutrient-starved condition. Typically, kigamicin D was found to suppress diverse mouse cancer cell line growth, and the IC50 value was about 0.95 µM [13]. In the absence of nutrition, kigamicin D exhibited preferential cytotoxicity to cancer cells and could inhibit the PI3K/Akt pathway [58]. A total of 10 novel pentangular polyphenols defined as amexanthomycins A–J (6–15) were obtained from the fermentation products of Amycolatopsis mediterranei S699 ∆rifA (the A. mediterranei S699 mutant strain). These compounds were produced through deleting polyketide synthase genes related to rifamycin biosynthesis. In this study, the effects of the above compounds on suppressing topoisomerases IIα (Topo IIα) were examined. The results showed that compounds 6–8 exhibited moderate inhibitory activity against Topo IIα (500 μM), while compounds 9–15 showed no activities [14].
Anthraquinones are the most abundant among the various natural quinone compounds. Earlier, they were mainly used as dyes. But later, their antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antiviral effects were discovered. A new anthracycline, namely, mutactimycin E (16) with two known compounds mutactimycin A (17) and D (18) were isolated from the EtOAc extract of Amycolatopsis sp. 17,128 collected from the soil sample near Ruby, Arizona. It had moderate effects to resist some Gram-positive bacteria [15]. Investigation of secondary metabolites from Amycolatopsis thermoflava SFMA-103 led to the isolation of the 1-methoxy-3-methyl-8-hydroxy-anthraquinone (19) pigment from the rhizosphere soil of sunflower collected in Medak, Andhra Pradesh, South India. Compound 19 displayed infusive anti-cancer activity in-vitro to resist lymphoblastic leukemia as well as lung cancer cells, with the IC50 values of 16.98 and 10.3 µM, separately. In addition, the DPPH assay showed that this compound had favorable capacity to scavenge free radicals with the EC50 value of 18.2 µg/mL [16]. Furthermore, compound 19 suppressed α-glucosidase and α-amylase with IC50 values of 10.32 and 0.91 µM, respectively. According to the research on the oral dose for Wistar rats, compound 19 remarkably suppressed the elevated glucose level at a dose of 100 mg/kg. Its toxicity was further assayed by the genotoxic analysis in both Chinese Hamster Ovary cells (in-vitro) and Swiss albino mice (in-vivo). The studies indicated that compound 19 had little effect on mouse survival. It was concluded that compound 19 was used at 100 mg/kg to treat hyperglycemia via inhibiting α-glucosidase and α-amylase enzymes without inducing any genotoxic effect [17]. 7-O-Methyl-5-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosylgenestein (20) was a novel isoflavonoid glycoside, while 7-O-α-D-arabinofuranosyl daidzein (21) was firstly extracted from natural sources. These two compounds, along with 5 known isoflavonoids, prunetin (22), kakkatin (23), isoformononetin (24), genistein (25), and formononetin (26) were produced by the lichen-associated Amycolatopsis sp. YIM 130642. Compounds 20 and 21 showed modest bacteriostatic activities against one or more pathogenic strains of Candida albicans, Escherichia coli, MRSA, S. aureus, and Salmonella typhi with their minimal inhibition concentrations (MICs) in the range of 32–256 μg/mL [18]. Sorbicillin (27) was isolated from the lichen-derived actinomycete strain Amycolatopsis sp. YIM 130,687 [19]. Isolation and identification of a new polycyclic antibiotic, pradimicin-IRD (28), was reported from the rare actinobacteria Amycolatopsis sp. IRD-009, which was collected from soil sample of Brazilian rainforest undergoing restoration area. Compound 28 exhibited antimicrobial activity against Streptococcus agalactiae-97, S. aureus-211 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27.859 with MIC values of 3.15 μg/mL. In addition, the cytotoxicity of compound 28 was determined by MTT assay, which inhibited HCT-116 colon carcinoma, MM 200 melanoma, MCF-7 breast carcinoma and RPE non-tumor retinal pigment epithelial cells with IC50 values of 0.8, 2.7, 1.55 and 1.48 μM, respectively [20]. Compound 28 could induce DNA damage (increased γH2AX and p21), cell cycle arrest (reduced Rb phosphorylation) and apoptosis (PARP1 and caspase 3 cleavage). It was capable of impacting on double stranded DNA which might be the novel target for compound 28 [59]. Three new angucyclines, (2R,3R)-2-hydroxy-8-O-methyltetrangomycin (29), (2R,3R)-2-hydroxy-5-O-methyltetrangomycin (30), amycomycin B (31), and a novel angucyclinone derivative, amycomycin A (32), with eight known compounds, tetrangomycin (33), pd116779 (34), tetrangulol (35), X-14881E (36), sakyomicin B (37), tetracyclinone (38), sakyomicin A (39), and sakyomicin C (40), were produced by Amycolatopsis sp. Hca1 [21,22], which was collected from the gut of Oxya chinensis. Compounds 33, 34, 39 and 40 possessed cytotoxic activities against the HeLa cells with the IC50 values of 0.27, 0.11, 0.56 and 0.39 μM, respectively, and compound 40 was also cytotoxic against BGC823, HepG2, A375, KB, and Ghost-R5 × 4 cell lines with the IC50 values of 11.03, 17.36, 17.5 and 14.0 μM, respectively. Amycofuran (41) is a new benzofuran glycoside isolated from Amycolatopsis saalfeldensis collected from a sponge sample [23]. All 41 polyphenols described above are presented in Figure 1.

2.2. Linear Polyketides

Through genomic analysis, the strain Amycolatopsis orientalis ATCC 43,491 was found to be the producer of vancomycin, which possessed genetic loci to produce over 10 secondary metabolites apart from vancomycin. It was estimated that a gene cluster containing the type I polyketide synthase mediated the biosynthesis for a new glycosidic polyketide ECO-0501 (42) [24]. Compound 42 exhibited stronger antibacterial activity than vancomycin against S. aureus ATCC TM 6538P in pH 5.0 and 6.0 with the MIC values of 0.125 and 0.25 μg/mL. This compound had potent effect on resisting Gram-positive bacteria MRSA and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) strains. The mechanistic studies proved that ECO-0501 may impact on either cell wall or membrane biosynthesis [60]. In addition, compound 42 chemical modified analogs, including esterified 43–45, N-acetylated 46, and hydrogenated 47 were reported. Compound 46 showed antibacterial activity against S. aureus ATCC TM 6538P with MIC values of 0.25, 0.5 and 2 μg/mL in pH 5, 6 and 7, respectively. The novel antibiotic vancoresmycin (48) was obtained from the culture broth of Amycolatopsis sp. ST 101170. It showed a potent effect on resisting the Gram-positive strains of E. faecium, S. aureus, S. pneumonia, S. epidermidis, S. pyogenes, together with a variety of drug-resistant microorganisms. The IC50 values were found to be less than 0.05 μM. By a non-pore forming and concentration-dependent depolarization mechanism, compound 48 selectively targeted the cytoplasmic membrane of gram-positive bacteria [61]. No inhibitory effect against gram-negative bacteria or anti-fungal activity was observed [25]. All 7 linear polyketides described above are presented in Figure 2.

2.3. Macrolides

Three novel glycosylated macrolactones, amycolatopsins A–C (49–51), were produced by Amycolatopsis sp. MST-108494 obtained from the soil in southern Australia. Both compounds 49 and 51 prevented M. tuberculosis (H37Rv, IC50 values of 4.4 and 5.7 μM) and M. bovis (BCG; IC50 values of 0.4 and 2.7 μM) from growing within the liquid culture. In addition, compounds 49 and 50 showed significant toxicity to the human lung cancer (NCIH-460; IC50 values of 1.2 and 0.28 μM) and colon carcinoma (SW620; IC50 values of 0.08 and 0.14 μM) cell lines. Whereas, compound 51 showed 5- to 100-fold less cytotoxicity with IC50 values of 5.9 and 10 μM, respectively [26]. Two new apoptolidins, 2′-O-succinyl-apoptolidin A (52) and 3′-O-succinyl-apoptolidin A (53), with five known compounds, apoptolidins A–D (54–57) and isoapoptolidin A (58), were produced by the Indonesian Amycolatopsis sp. ICBB 8242 isolated from the Black Water Ecosystems in Kalimantan. Compound 54 could inhibit the human H292 and HeLa cells with IC50 values of 0.02 and 0.04 μM, respectively. Compounds 52 and 53 could suppress the human H292 cell with IC50 values of 0.09 and 0.08 μM, respectively [27]. All 10 macrolides described above are presented in Figure 2.

2.4. Macrolactams

Macrolactams have been used in clinical trials since 1940 [62], in which penicillin and cephalosporins are the representative antibiotics. For better exploiting the rifamycin diversity, the Amycolatopsis mediterranei S699 strain was cultured on the YMG agar media. Eleven rifamycin congeners, including six new compounds, rifamycinosides A (59) and B (60), 28-desmethyl-28-hydroxyrifamycin W (61), 27,28-epoxy-28-desmethylrifamycin W (62), 30-hydroxyrifamycin W hemiacetal (63) and 20-hydroxyrifamycin S (64), with five known compounds, rifamycin S (65), 16,17-dehydrorifamycin G (66), rifamycins O (67), Z (68) and W (69), were isolated. Compounds 59 and 60 possess the similar skeleton of rifamycin glycosides. The polyketide cores of these two compounds presented the new rifamycin ansa chain cleavage pattern. Compound 64 showed potent inhibitory activity against T3SS, caused G2/M phase arrest, and attracted DNA damage in HCT116 cells [28]. Five unusual macrolactams, rifamorpholines A–E (70–74), were isolated from Amycolatopsis sp. HCa4 collected from the gut of Locusta migratoria. Compounds 71 and 73 possessed antimicrobial activity against MRSA, S. aureus, S. pyogenes, Bacillus subtilis, and Micrococcus luteus with MIC values in the range of 0.5–8.0 Μm [29]. Four new 20-membered glycosylated polyketide macrolactams, macrotermycins A–D (75–78), were produced by Amycolatopsis sp. M39 collected from a Macrotermes natalensis. Compound 75 exhibited antimicrobial activity against B. subtilis ATCC 6051, S. aureus ATCC 25923, Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 9763 and C. albicans ATCC 24,433 with MIC values of 1.0, 1.5, 5.0, 10, respectively. And compound 77 exhibited antimicrobial activity against B. subtilis ATCC 6051, S. aureus ATCC 25923, Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 9763 and C. albicans ATCC 24,433 with MIC values of 15, 10, 20, 25 μg/mL, respectively [30]. A novel compound, ansamycin (79), was produced by Amycolatopsis alba DSM 44262. However, this compound exhibited no antimicrobial activity for S. aureus, B. subtilis, P. aeruginosa and C. albicans [31]. All 21 macrolactams described above are presented in Figure 3.

2.5. Thiazolyl Peptides

After chromatographically fractionating the fermentation broth extract of Amycolatopsis fastidiosa, 4 known nocathiacins I–IV (80–83) along with 2 novel thiazolyl peptides, thiazomycin (84) and thiazomycin A (85) were isolated [32,33,34]. Compounds 84 and 85 showed potent inhibition against Gram-positive bacteria. Continued chemical screening led to the separation of an intermediate product and six new thiazolyl peptide congeners, MJ347-81F4 B (86), thiazomycins B–D (87–89), and E1-E3 (90–92). The new compounds were tested for their antimicrobial activity against gram-positive bacterial strains of S. aureus, E. faecalis, S. pneumonia, and other drug-resistant strains. The results indicated that compounds 87–89 effectively inhibited the growth of the pathogenic bacteria described above, whereas compounds 90–92 showed no obvious antimicrobial activity [35]. Five novel compounds thioamycolamides A–E (93–97) were obtained from the fermentation products of Amycolatopsis sp. 26−4 isolated from Iriomote Island near Okinawa, Japan. They were cycliclipopeptides containing sulfur, thioether rings, thiazoline, along with fatty acid moieties. Compounds 93 and 96 showed moderate cytotoxicity with the IC50 values ranging from 6.53 to 21.22 μM. However, compound 97 had an IC50 value greater than 100 μM [36]. All 18 thiazolyl peptides described above are presented in Figure 4.

2.6. Cyclic Peptides

Cyclic peptides always possess antibacterial, antitumor, hypotoxic, immunosuppressive activities and have a merit of favorable binding affinity and selectivity for certain receptors [63]. The limited conformational freedom conferred by cyclization enables cyclic peptides to span large surfaces while retaining the conformational restriction that yields high selectivity and affinity. Such advantages render them the ideal selection for developing therapeutics [64]. While screening antibiotics against MRSA and VRE, the novel cyclic peptide, PRG-A (98) containing the distinct piperazic acid, was obtained from the fermentation broth of Amycolatopsis sp. ML1-hF4 isolated from a soil sample collected at Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan [37]. During the optimization of the production process of PRG-A, three new derivatives, namely, PRG-B (99), C (100), and D (101), were further isolated from the same strain. This study examined the effects of these new PRGs on resisting a variety of Gram-positive and -negative bacteria, like VRE and MRSA. The results showed that compounds 98 and 100 exhibited potent and broad antibacterial activity against gram-positive bacteria with the IC50 value of about 0.72 μM. The antibacterial activity of compounds 99 and 101 was lower, with the IC50 values ranging from 5.61 to 23.37 μM. However, all compounds failed to show anti-bacterial activity against gram-negative bacteria [38]. Compound 98 disrupted cell membrane function by disruption of membrane potential [65]. Another four new cyclic depsipeptide compounds, named valgamicins A (102), C (103), T (104) and V (105), were isolated from Amycolatopsis sp. ML1-hF4. Compound 105 possessed an excellent cytotoxicity against a series of human tumor cell lines, such as MIA Paca 2 (Pancreatic cancer), HGC-27 (Gastric cancer), GSS (Gastric cancer), 5637 (Bladder cancer), NCI-H1650 (Lung cancer), GI-1 (Glioma), NB16 (Neuroblastoma), ME-180 (Cervical cancer), and HSC-490 (Tongue cancer), with IC50 values from 6.6 to 21.6 μM [39]. All 8 cyclic peptides described above are presented in Figure 4.

2.7. Glycopeptides

Glycopeptide antibiotics are used as a key weapon in against bacteria, especially multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens. The ground-breaking work about glycopeptide antibiotics resistance mechanisms in Gram-positive pathogens were published in the 1990s [66]. Chloroorienticins were similar to vancomycin-type antibiotics. Five new chloroorienticins A–E (106–110), orienticins A (111) and D (112), vancomycin (113) and its aglycone (114) were isolated from the fermentation broth of Amycolatopsis orientalis PA-45052. Some of them showed higher antibacterial activity than vancomycin. Compounds 106–110 showed significant antibacterial activity against S. aureus JC-1 and MRSA with MIC values in the range of 0.2–0.78 μg/mL. Vancomycin (113) was comparatively against these two bacteria with MIC values of 0.78 and 1.58 μg/mL, respectively [40]. MM 47,761 (115) and MM 49,721 (116) were obtained from Amycolatopsis orientalis NCBI 12,608 and displayed a favorable antimicrobial effect on Gram-positive strains. Compounds 115 and 116 could inhibit B. subtilis ATCC6633, Corynebacterium xerosis NCTC9755, M. luteus NCTC8340, S. aureus Oxford, S. aureus Russell, S. aureus V573 MRa, S. saprophyticus FL1, S. epidermidis 60137, S. epidermidis 54815, Streptococcus pyogenes CN10, S. agalactiae Hester, S. sanguis ATCC 10556, S. faecalis I with the MIC values from 0.5 to 8 μg/mL [41]. A new bioactive antibiotic, eremomycin B (117), along with one known antibiotic, eremomycin (118), were isolated from the culture broth of Amycolatopsis orientalis subsp. Eremomycini [42]. All 13 glycopeptides described above are presented in Figure 5.

2.8. Amide Derivatives

Albachelin (119), a novel siderophore, was obtained from the Amycolatopsis alba culture with iron depletion. Then, ESI–MS/MS together with NMR spectroscopy was performed to characterize the gallium (III) complex [43]. Albisporachelin (120), a new siderophore, was obtained from the Amycolatopsis albispora WP1T culture broth with iron depletion using sediments obtained at −2945 m from the Indian Ocean [44]. In the course of bacterial translocase I inhibitor screening, a new compound, A-102395 (121) was isolated from Amycolatopsis sp. SANK 60206. A-102395 (isolated from a soil sample collected in Hokkaido, Japan) showed strong inhibition on the bacterial translocase I with the IC50 value of 0.01 μM. This compound showed no antibacterial effect on the analyzed strains [45]. The indole alkaloids are associated with cyclopiazonic acids, which were previously only detected in fungi. In addition, amycocyclopiazonic acid (122), along with amycolactam (123), was obtained from Amycolatopsis saalfeldensis. Combined with spectroscopic data, the structures of compounds 122 and 123 were identified to be new indole alkaloids related to cyclopiazonic acids. Amycolactam was significantly cytotoxic to gastric cancer SNU638 and colon cancer HCT116 cells, and the IC50 values were 0.8 and 2.0 μM, respectively [23]. The novel derivative of carbamothioic S-acid (124) was obtained from Amycolatopsis alba DSM 44262∆abm9 fermentation extract exposed to 25 mM N-acetyl-D-glucosamine [46]. Amycophthalazinone A (125), the first example of natural occurring new phthalazinone derivative, was discovered from the fermentation products of the lichen-associated Amycolatopsis sp. YIM 130,642 [18]. Compound 125 had potent antibacterial effect on S. typhi, C. albicans, and S. aureus, with IC50 values of 6.92, 13.84, and 6.92 μM, respectively. 2-Pyruvoylaminobenzamide (126), (–)-chrysogine (127), 4-(3-methylbut-2-enyloxy) benzamide (128), acetotryptamide (129), 2-acetamidophenol (130), anthranilic acid (131), phenacetamide (132) and 2-carbamoyl-3-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone (133) were isolated from the cultural of Amycolatopsis sp. YIM 130687. Compounds 128 and 133 were firstly discovered from microorganisms [19].
Two novel echinosporin derivatives, echinosporin (134) and 7-deoxyechinosporin (135), were obtained from the culture broth of Amycolatopsis sp. YIM PH20520 from the Panax notoginseng rhizosphere soil samples collected from Wenshang, Yunnan Province of China. Compound 134 had potent effect on resisting four P. notoginseng root-rot pathogens, including Fusarium solani, Fusarium oxysporum, Phoma herbarum and Alternaria panax, and the MIC values were 64, 64, 64 and 32 μg/mL, respectively. Compound 135 had moderate effect on resisting F. solani, F. oxysporum, P. herbarum and A. panax, with the MIC values of 128, 128, 128 and 64 μg/mL, respectively [47]. Two novel compounds, dipyrimicins A (136) and B (137), were produced by Amycolatopsis sp. K16-0194. Compound 136 exhibited excellent antimicrobial activity against S. cerevisiae ATCC 9763, Kocuria rhizophila ATCC 9341, B. subtilis ATCC 6633, E. coli NIHJ, Xanthomonas campestris pv. oryzae KB 88 with the inhibition zone from 16 to 21 mm in a dose of 30 μg and from 11 to 27 mm in a dose of 100 μg. Compound 136 also displayed strong cytotoxic activity against Hela 3S, HT29, A549, H1299, Panc1, THP-1, Jarkat and HL-60 with the IC50 values of 5.1 ± 0.5, 6.2 ± 0.3, 4.3 ± 0.2, 9.2 ± 0.5, 9.4 ± 3.5, 9.4 ± 3.5, 4.4 ± 0.5 and 3.9 ± 0.7 μM, respectively. Compound 137 only had a moderate inhibition on H1299 cell line with an IC50 value of 6.8 ± 3.3 μM [48]. A new pyridinium, 1-(10-aminodecyl) pyridinium (138), was produced by Amycolatopsis alba var. nov. DVR D4, which was collected from marine sediment of Visakhapatnam coast. With a dose of 1000 μg/mL, compound 138 had a great effect on HeLa, MCF-7 (breast cancer), U87MG (brain cancer) cells with percentage viability (%) and percentage inhibition (%) of 39.54, 60.36, 58.15 and 60.46, 39.64, 41.85, respectively [49]. Three novel siderochelins D–F (140–142), with the known siderochelin A (139) were obtained from Amycolatopsis sp. LZ149, derived from the rhizosphere of Cynodon dactyIon in the Baicheng beach of Xiamen, Fujian, China. Compound 139 exhibited antimicrobial activity against Bacillus pumilus CMCC55051, B. subtilis CMCC63501, E. coli CMCC4103 and S. aureus CMCC2600 with the diameter of inhibition zone from 10 to 15 mm [50]. Epoxyquinomicins A–D (143–146), four new compounds were isolated from the cluture broth of A. sulphurea MK299-95F4 from the soil sample collected at Sendai City, Miyagi Prefecture, Japan. Compounds 143 and 144 exhibited antimicrobial activity against M. luteus IFO3333 and M. luteus PCI1001 with MIC values from 3.12 to 6.25 μg/mL [51]. Compounds 143–146 (1–4 mg/kg) possessed an inhibition ability of type II collagen-induced arthritis [67]. All 28 amide and amino derivatives described above are presented in Figure 6.

2.9. Glycoside Derivatives

HPLC-diode array screening was used to isolate tigloside (147) and 2,2′-di-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-α-D-glucopyranosyl α-D-glucopyranoside (148) from the Amycolatopsis sp. NN0 21,702 mycelium. Chromatographic approaches were used to purify these new compounds, while NMR spectroscopy together with chemical degradation assays was adopted to confirm their structures [52]. Three new tetrasaccharide derivatives, actinotetraoses I–K (149–151), with three known compounds, actinotetraoses A–C (152–154), were isolated from Amycolatopsis sp. HCa1, which was collected from the gut of grasshopper [53]. Another novel tetrasaccharide derivative, actinotetraose L (155), was also obtained from the Amycolatopsis sp. HCa1 [54]. However, these compounds showed no significant bioactivity. The 9 glycoside derivatives described above are presented in Figure 7.

2.10. Enediyne Derivatives

Amycolamycins A (156) and B (157), two new enediyne derivatives, were isolated from Amycolatopsis sp. HCa4, which was collected from locust. Compound 156 could inhibit M231 cell lines by inducing apoptosis through activation of caspase-3 with the IC50 value of 7.9 μM [55]. The two enediyne derivatives described above are presented in Figure 7.

2.11. Sesquiterpenes

Two novel abscisic acid-type sesquiterpenes, (E)-3-methyl-5-(2,6,6-trimethyl-3-oxocyclohex-1-enyl)pent-2-enoic acid (158) and (E)-3-methyl-5-(2,6,6-trimethyl-4-oxocyclohex-2-enyl)pent-2-enoic acid (159), were produced by Amycolatopsis alba DSM 44,262 [31]. However, these two compounds exhibited no antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, B. subtilis, P. aeruginosa and C. albicans. The two sesquiterpenes described above are presented in Figure 7.

3. Biofunction of Amycolatopsis Species

The Amycolatopsis species have potential for biological degradation, bioconversion and biosorption, which might solve the problem of environmental pollution in the future [68].

3.1. Biological Degradation

ZJ0273 was a widely used broad-spectrum herbicide and left in soil in large numbers. Cai et al. found that ZJ0273 could be utilized by Amycolatopsis sp. M3-1 as the sole carbon and energy source with higher degrading activity. At 30 °C and pH 7.0, the efficiency of ZJ0273 degradation by Amycolatopsis sp. M3-1 was 59.3% and 68.5% in 25 and 60 days, respectively [69]. Naproxen was a drug utilized by humans; however, it was detected in surface waters and sanitary effluents in 71 countries, causing toxic effects on biota and further destroying the ecological environment [70]. At the concentration of 50 mg/L, naproxen could be used as the sole carbon and energy source of Amycolatopsis sp. Poz 14 and completely degraded in 18 days, while it will affect the growth of Amycolatopsis when its concentration was more than 50 mg/L [71]. It takes a long time for plastics to degrade in nature and the resulting environmental pollution problems are becoming more and more serious. Some Amycolatopsis strains possessed a polylactic acid (PLA) degradation capability including Amycolatopsis sp. HT-32, Amycolatopsis sp. 3118, Amycolatopsis sp. KT-s-9, A. mediterranei ATCC 27649, Amycolatopsis sp. 41, Amycolatopsis sp. K104-1, A. orientalis ssp. orientalis, Amycolatopsis thailandensis CMU-PLA07T and Amycolatopsis sp. SCM_MK2-4 [72]. Tan et al. proved that A. mediteranei was capable to hydrolyze the aliphatic plastics poly(ε-caprolactone) and poly(1,4-butylene succinate) via a extracellular lipase [73]. In addition, Amycolatopsis sp. ATCC 39,116 could depolymerize high molecular weight lignin species and catabolize a significant portion of the low molecular weight aromatics and may become a mature route for biological lignin valorization in the future [74].

3.2. Bioconversion

The strains of Amycolatopsis sp. HR167 and Amycolatopsis sp. ATCC39116 were able to convert ferulic acid (cell wall component of higher plants) into vanillin (important flavor compound) with concentrations of 11.5 and 13.9 g/L, respectively. The vanillin production of vdh (encoded vanillin dehydrogenase) mutant of Amycolatopsis sp. ATCC39116 was increased 2.3 times due to the enzyme catalyzed the catabolism of vanillin [75]. Wuxistatin, a novel HMG–CoA reductase inhibitor, was transformed from lovastatin by hydroxylase (cytochrome P450) and isomerases of Amycolatopsis sp. CGMCC 1149, showing a four-fold activity, more than lovastatin [76,77].

3.3. Biosorption

Albarracín et al. discovered that A. tucumanensis DSM 45,259 (initially named as Amycolatopsis sp. AB0) possessed copper specific biosorption ability (25 mg/g) [78,79]. In the presence of Cu(II), A. tucumanensis DSM 45,259 enhanced the ability of reducing Cr(VI) [80]. The bioemulsifiers produced by A. tucumanensis DSM 45,259 was able to mediate two times Cr(VI) recovery compared to deionized water from soil and maybe utilized to recover Cr(VI) in the future [81]. Baz et al. collected Amycolatopsis sp. GT6, Amycolatopsis sp. GT15 and Amycolatopsis sp. GT39 from abandoned mining areas, which could tolerate high concentrations of metals (Cu, 0.1; Zn, 0.1; Cr, 0.15; Pb, 0.25 mg/mL) [82].

4. Bioactivities of Secondary Metabolites from Amycolatopsis

The bioactivities of secondary metabolites from Amycolatopsis strains have been also presented in Table 2, including antimicrobial, cytotoxic, antioxidant, topo IIα inhibition, anti-hyperglycemic, enzyme inhibition and DNA damage.
Among the total of 159 secondary metabolites, 41 compounds exhibited potent antimicrobial activities, a majority of which showed inhibition on Gram-positive bacteria growth. Most of them were also found to be active against various multi-drug resistant strains. Kigamicins (1–5), mutactimycin E (16), pradimicin-IRD (28), ECO-0501 (42), vancoresmycin (48), amycolatopsins A (49) and C (51), rifamorpholines B (71) and D (73), macrotermycins A (75) and C (77), thiazomycin (84), thiazomycins A–D (85, 87–89), PRG-A–D (98–101), chloroorienticins A–E (106–110), vancomycin (113), MM 47,761 (115), MM 49,721 (116) and amycophthalazinone A (125) showed significant inhibitory effects against gram-positive bacteria and their drug-resistant types with MIC and IC50 values less than 1 μg/mL and 25 μM, respectively. While epoxyquinomicins A (143) and B (144) displayed moderate activities with MIC values in the range of 3.12–6.25 μg/mL. 7-O-Methyl-5-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosylgenestein (20), 7-O-α-D-arabinofuranosyl daidzein (21), echinosporin (134) and 7-deoxyechinosporin (135) showed modest antibacterial activities with MIC values in the range of 32–256 μg/mL.
Of these reported substances, a total of 18 compounds had strong cytotoxicities to different cancer cell lines. For instance, kigamicin D (4) suppressed mouse cancer cell growth, and the IC50 value was approximately 0.95 μM. 1-Methoxy-3-methyl-8-hydroxy-anthraquinone (19) displayed infusive anti-cancer effect on lymphoblastic leukemia together with lung cancer cells, and the IC50 values were 16.98 and 10.3 µM, respectively. Pradimicin-IRD (28) showed excellent cytotoxicity to HCT-116, MM 200, MCF-7 and RPE with the IC50 values of 0.8, 2.7, 1.55 and 1.48 μM, respectively. Tetrangomycin (33), pd116779 (34), sakyomicins A (39) and C (40) could inhibit the Hela cells with the IC50 values of 0.27, 0.11,0.56 and 0.39 μM, respectively. Amycolatopsins A (49) and B (50) had potent effects on resisting human colon cancer (SW620; IC50 values, 0.08 and 0.14 μM) as well as lung cancer (NCIH-460; IC50 values, 1.2, and 0.28 μM) cell lines. 3′-O-Succinyl-apoptolidin A (52), 2′-O-succinyl-apoptolidin A (53) and apoptolidins A (54) could inhibit the H292 cells with the IC50 values of 91, 82 and 22 μM, respectively. Thioamycolamides A (93) and D (96) showed moderate cytotoxicity to fibrosarcoma HT1080 and cervix adenocarcinoma HeLa with the IC50 values ranging from 6.53 to 21.22 μM. Valgamicins V (105) could inhibit the cancer cells, such as MIA Paca 2, HGC-27, GSS, 5637, NCI-H1650, NB16, ME-180, HSC-490 (IC50, 6.6-21.6 μM). Amycolactam (123) had marked effect on resisting gastric cancer SNU638 cells as well as colon cancer HCT116 cells. The IC50 values were recorded to be 0.8 and 2.0 μM, respectively. Dipyrimicin A (136) exhibited moderate cytotoxicity to a series of cancer cells (Hela 3S, HT29, A549, H1299, Panc1, THP-1, Jarkat, HL-60) with the IC50 from 3.9 to 9.4 μM. However, dipyrimicin B (137) only suppressed the H1299 with the IC50 value of 6.8 ± 3.3 μM. Amycolamycin A (156) showed moderate cytotoxicity to M321 with the IC50 value of 7.9 μM.
A total of 15 compounds showed other bioactivities. Amexanthomycins A–J (6–15) possessed a xanthone-containing pentangular polyphenol core. Compounds 9–15 had no inhibitory effect on DNA topoisomerase IIα (Topo IIα), while compounds 6–8 exhibited moderate inhibitory activity against Topo IIα at 500 μM. These results showed that the different numbers and types of deoxysugars in compounds 6–15 will affect the inhibitory activity of topoisomerase. Compound 19 was used at 100 mg/kg to treat hyperglycemia without inducing any genotoxic effect and also inhibiting α-amylase and α-glucosidase with the IC50 values of 0.91 and 10.32 µM, respectively. Experiments in mice have proven the safety and efficacy of compound 19. Compounds 59–61, 63 and 67 exhibited strong activity for inhibiting Topo I at 50 and 100 μM. Moreover, compounds 59–61, 63, 65, 67 and 68 showed the activity of inhibiting Topo IIα at 50 μM. Compound 64 had strong effect on inhibiting T3SS, resulted in cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase, and led to DNA damage within the HCT116 cells. A-102395 (121) was identified as the strong bacterial translocase I inhibitor, and its IC50 value was 0.011 μM. At the dose of 1–4 mg/kg, epoxyquinomicins C (145) and D (146) could inhibit type II collagen-induced arthritis.

5. Synthesis of Secondary Metabolites from Amycolatopsis and Their Derivatives

5.1. Biosynthetic Pathways of Secondary Metabolites from Amycolatopsis

Research on biosynthetic pathways is essential for the further study on secondary metabolites. For example, finding the regulatory gene could increase or decrease the production of metabolites and also uncover how the concerted efforts of various enzymes to form the compound [83]. In this review, we list the hypothetical biosynthetic pathways for several potent bioactive compounds. Few studies have been conducted and need to arouse the attention of researchers.
The mutant strain A. mediterranei S699ΔrifA, which was deleted for the biosynthesis gene of rifamycins, displayed the ability for producing ten new pentangular polyphenols, amexanthomycins A–J (6–15) [14]. As described in the literature, the production of associated genes included polyketide synthase (PKS), glycosyltransferase, methyltransferase, monooxygenase, dehydrogenase, oxidoreductase, cytochrome P450 and epimerase (Figure 8A). The biosynthetic pathway of amexanthomycins were proposed by Li et al. [14] and exhibited in the Figure 8B. An acetyl-CoA starter unit and 11 malonyl-CoA extender units could produce prediction intermediate, the pentacyclic xanthone core, by min-PKS synthase, cyclase, and oxidoreductase. Then, the predicted oxidase catalyzed the oxidative rearrangement reaction of intermediate. Finally, this aglycone was glycosylated by the glycosyl transferases, completing the biosynthesis of compounds 6–15 (Figure 8B) [14].
The genome of A. orientalis ATCC 43,491 included a type I PKS which encoded by ORF 18-23 and synthesized the polyketide chain [24]. The monooxygenase and acyl-CoA ligase were encoded by ORF 7 and 25 which catalyzed arginine to 4-guanidino butyryl-CoA. D-glucose was catalyzed by oxidoreductase (ORF 13) and turned into D-glucuronic acid. Glycine and succinyl-CoA were transformed into 5-aminolevulinate by acyltransferase (ORF 16), and then turned into 5-aminolevulinate-CoA by acyl-CoA ligase (ORF 17). 5-aminolevulinate-CoA was transformed into aminohydroxycyclopentenone through cyclization reaction by the coenzyme A ester. Three ORFs (14, 15 and 24) provided glycosyltransferase, amide synthetase and acyltransferase to add 4-guanidino butyryl-CoA, D-glucuronic acid and aminohydroxycyclopentenone onto the polyketide chain which formed compound 47 (Figure 9) [24].
The genome of Amycolatopsis sp. HCa4 was analyzed by antiSMASH and 2ndfind, the cluster 19 was highly similar to the biosynthetic gene cluster of rifamycin [29]. A 3-amino-5-hydroxybenzoic acid starter unit and two malonyl CoA and eight methyl malonyl CoA extender units could produce intermediate 1 on a type I polyketide synthase. The release of the polyketide chain and the formation of intramolecular amide were catalyzed by the amide synthase encoded by Rmp F and then generated proansamycin X (intermediate 2). Proansamycin X was then catalyzed by a serious of enzymes encoded by Rmp T, U, 11, 5, etc., and turned into the key intermediate 3, dimethyl-desacetyl-rifamycin S. All the above synthetic processes were the same as the synthesis of rifamycin, but Xiao et al. did not find the rifamycin analogs in this strain and they suspected that maybe an unidentified enzyme catalyzed the keto–enol tautomerization of intermediate 3 to form intermediate 4. The intermediate 4 was formed to the intermediate 5 through a crucial 1,6-cyclization, which was further converted into compound 70 and compounds 71–74 followed by two branch pathways. The formation of compound 70 was catalyzed by 25-O-acetyltransferase (Rmp 20) and C-27-O-methyltransferase (Rmp 14), as well as epimerization of C-21. However, the formation of compounds 71–74 was not speculated (Figure 10) [29].
A-102395 (121) was a capuramycin-type nucleoside antibiotics possessed high specific chemical features, which were isolated from Amycolatopsis sp. SANK 60206. By synthase encoded by Cpr38, chorismate was catalyzed to form 4-amino-4-deoxychorismate (ADC), which subsequently catalyzed elimination of pyruvate by aminotransferase (Cpr12) to form para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA). Catalyzed by actinomycin synthetase (Cpr37), PABA became activated acyl-adenylate and combined with the free-standing carrier protein (Cpr36) to yield the thioester-linked PABA. Under the synergic catalyzation of ketosynthase (Cpr34) and chain length factor (Cpr35), the thioester-linked PABA as a recipient was decarboxylatively condensed with malonyl-S-acyl carrier protein (ACP) to form β-ketothioester. That β-ketothioester was reduced by 3-oxoacyl-ACP reductase Cpr33 and then hydroxylated by luciferase-like monooxygenase Cpr32 to form 3-(4-aminophenyl)-2,3-dihydroxypropanoic acid. The next step was polyamide biosynthesis, in which 3-(4-aminophenyl)-2,3-dihydroxypropanoic acid was catalyzed by a serious of enzymes including a hydrophilic amino acid (Cpr54), two carrier proteins (Cpr48 and 55), a condensation domain protein (Cpr47), and three transglutaminase-like proteins (Cpr49, 50 and 57) to form an A-102395 core. The coupling of the arylamine-containing polyamide to the A-102395 core was catalyzed by carboxyl methyltransferase (Cpr27) and MitI transacylase (Cpr51) [84]. However, the mechanism of Cpr51 has not been proven and needs further research (Figure 11).
The strain Amycolatopsis sp. HCa4 possessed acm gene of amycolamycins A and B, which spanned a ∼76 kb contiguous DNA region. The Acm A2, A3, A4 and A5 provided NDP-glucose dehydrogenase, glucuronic acid decarboxylase, C-methyltransferase and aminotransferase. These enzymes catalyzed the NDP-glucose to NDP activated aminosugar. The 6-methylsalicylic acid synthase, CoA ligase and C-methyltransferase were encoded by Acm B, B2 and B1, which catalyzed three successive steps starting from acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA to 3,6- dimethylsalicylyl CoA. The genes of Acm P1, P2, P3, P9, P6 and P4 encoded the glycosyltransferase, NRPS A-PCP didomain protein, hydroxylase, monooxygenase, O-methyltransferase and halogenase. These enzymes catalyzed six successive steps converting p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate to 2-chloro-3-hydroxy-4,5-dimethoxymandelate moiety. Acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA were catalyzed to form enediyne core by a series of enzymes, which were encoded by E, E2-E11, D2, L, M and N. The next step needed B3 (acetyltransferase) to connect NDP activated aminosugar to 3,6-dimethylsalicylyl CoA. The NDP activated aminosugar and 2-chloro-3-hydroxy-4,5-dimethoxymandelate moiety were then connected to the enediyne core, which needs the Acm A6 (acetyltransferase) and Acm P10 (type II condensation enzyme), respectively. The connection product was transformed into compounds 156 and 157 by bergman cyclization (Figure 12) [55].

5.2. Chemical Synthesis, Semi-Synthesis and Biosynthesis of the Derivatives

5.2.1. Chemical Synthesis of DHM2EQ

DHM2EQ was a derivative of epoxyquinomicin C and possessed greater strong inhibitory activity on type II collagen-induced arthritis than epoxyquinomicin C. The derivative was synthesized from 2,5-dimethoxyaniline in 5 steps via chemical synthesis. In pyridine, 2,5-dimethoxyaniline (a) and acetylsalicyloyl chloride were coupled to give salicylamide (b). In methanol, compound (b) was oxidized into quinone monoketal (c) by iodobenzenediacetate. Under deprotection of the phenolic acetyl group, epoxidation of (c) in aqueous THF with alkaline hydrogen peroxide gave epoxide (d). Compound (d) was reduced by NaBH4 yield (e) and the deprotection of compound (e) with p-TsOH gave DHM2EQ (Figure 13) [85].

5.2.2. Semi-Synthesis of 24-Desmethylrifampicin

24-Desmethylrifampicin (d) was a semi-synthetic derivative of rifamycin B and 24-desmethylrifamycin B (a) was semi-synthetic precursor of (d). Nigam et al. replaced the acyltransferase domain of module 6 of rifamycin polyketide synthase (rifAT6) with that of module 2 of rapamycin polyketide synthase (rapAT2) to gain a mutant A. mediterranei S699 DCO#34, which could produce 24-desmethylrifamycin B (a). 24-Desmethylrifamycin S (b) was the oxidation product of compound (a) using CuCl2 as catalyst. Compound (b) was then treated with paraformaldehyde and 1,3,5-trimethyl-hexahydro-1,3,5-triazine in acetic acid to gain 3-methyl-1,3-oxazino(5,6-c)-24-desmethylrifamycin (c), which was subsequently treated with 1-amino-4-methylpiperazine to give 24-desmethylrifampicin (d) [86]. Nirjara et al. uncovered that the damage of RifP, RifQ, transport cascade was an essential reason of the low yield of only 20 mg/L of compound (a). They thought the production of compound (a) could be increased by blocking RifQ to restore the function of RifP in the future (Figure 14) [87].

5.2.3. Biosynthesis of CDCHD

Chelocardin (CHD) isolated from A. sulphurea was a structurally atypical tetracycline [2]. CHD possessed excellent anti-microbial activity with little toxicity. 2-Carboxamido-2-deacetyl-chelocardin (CDCHD) was a derivative of CDH by introducing oxyD (amidotransferase) and oxyP (thiolase) genes from Streptomyces rimosus otc gene cluster into A. sulphurea. The production of CDCHD was very low when only introduced OxyD into A. sulphurea because OxyP could suppress priming of CDH by removing the competing acetyl units [88]. Then, the CDH gene cluster took over the rest of reaction [89]. These two genes worked together to change the main product from CHD to CDCHD (Figure 15).

6. Conclusions

This review summarizes the various chemical structures and biological activities of 159 compounds isolated from Amycolatopsis species inhabiting soil, insects, lichen, islands, the marine and plants between 1990–2020. A total of 45 compounds possessed bioactivities, of which 32 compounds have glycosides and 31 compounds have cyclic skeletons. Thus, the novel compounds with glycosides and cyclic skeletons should be considered by researchers. For example, compound 51, the homolog of 49 and 50, lacked glycoside and showed 5- to 100-fold less cytotoxicity [26]. The multitudinous secondary metabolites of the genus Amycolatopsis represent great research value and deserve further investigation. On the other hand, the genus of Amycolatosis could metabolize a variety of carbon sources and grow in a wide temperature range, which provides the possibility for them to become important biotechnological tools. It has been proven that this genus has great potential in degrading plastics, treating heavy metals, and biotransformation [68]. More researches are needed to transform these potentials into applications to solve practical problems to benefit mankind.
The study of biosynthetic pathway is a crucial process for excavating bioactive natural products. However, people are more willing to study the biosynthesis and mechanism of action of vancomycin, rifamycin and their derivatives. There are relatively fewer studies on the biosynthesis of other bioactive compounds and more attention is needed to be paid to researchers. In the course of the biosynthetic pathway study, a series of tools, for example, antiSMASH [90] or PRISM [91], have been fully exploited, which could derive a prediction of natural products, including the enzymes, regulatory genes and biosynthetic genes et al. through the genome sequencing results. We could also use these tools to reveal sufficiently more silent biosynthetic gene clusters and uncover more and more new interesting bioactive natural products. The biosynthetic potency of Amycolatopsis species is evidenced to be massive and this genus possesses many silent biosynthetic gene clusters waiting to be found [92]. Recently, Pan et al. obtained two new compounds, amycolapeptins A and B by combined-cultivating two strains of Amycoaltopsis sp. 26-4 and Tsukamurella pulmonis TP-B0596 for the first time, while they could not be discovered in a monoculture of Amycoaltopsis sp. 26-4 [93], which provided a new path for the cultivation of Amycolatopsis.
In conclusion, the research on the genus Amycolatopsis needs to be further considered in-depth. Most of all, the mechanism of action and biosynthetic regulatory genes of potent active compounds deserve to be deeply explored since they could determine the utility value of these compounds. Derivatives sometimes tend to have stronger activity so that more study might be focused on the structural modification of secondary metabolites for providing more analogues to be screened for antibiotics. In addition, compounds with excellent bioactivity that have been discovered should be solved for mass production due to their promising medicinal application. The potential ecological effects of Amycolatopsis species should be also taken seriously. The environmental pollution problem might be solved in some ways by thoroughly excavating the biofunction of the strains. In the future, we firmly believe that the genus Amycolatopsis will show its expansive utilization and serve for pharmaceutical area and environmental protection.

Author Contributions

Z.S. wrote the paper, T.X., J.W., Y.H., C.L. and S.L. checked the paper, S.W. verified the content. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81860634), Applied Basic Research Key Project of Yunnan Province (No. 202001BB050029), Major Science and Technology Projects of Yunnan Province (Digitalization, development and application of biotic resource, 202002AA100007), Project of Innovative Research Team of Yunnan Province (202005AE160005), and Science Research Foundation of Yunnan Province Education Department.

Data Availability Statement

All data in this article is openly available without any restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lazzarini, A.; Cavaletti, L.; Toppo, G.; Marinelli, F. Rare genera of Actinomycetes as potential producers of new antibiotics. Anton. Leeuw. Int. J. Gen. 2000, 78, 399–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lechevalier, M.P.; Prauser, H.; Labeda, D.P.; Ruan, J.S. 2 New genera of nocardioform Actinomycetes-Amycolata gen. nov and Amycolatopsis gen. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1986, 36, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Stackebrandt, E.; Rainey, F.A.; WardRainey, N.L. Proposal for a new hierarchic classification system, actinobacteria classis. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1997, 47, 479–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Sensi, P.; Greco, A.M.; Ballotta, R. Rifomycin. I. Isolation and properties of rifomycin B and rifomycin complex. Antibiot. Annu. 1959, 7, 262–270. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Barna, J.C.; Williams, D.H. The structure and mode of action of glycopeptide antibiotics of the vancomycin group. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1984, 38, 339–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Preobrazhenskaya, M.N.; Olsufyeva, E.N. Patents on glycopeptides of the vancomycin family and their derivatives as antimicrobials: January 1999-June 2003. Expert. Opin. Ther. Pat. 2004, 14, 141–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Harris, C.M.; Kopecka, H.; Harris, T.M. Vancomycin-structure and transformation to Cdp-I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 6915–6922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bischoff, D.; Pelzer, S.; Bister, B.; Nicholson, G.J.; Stockert, S.; Schirle, M.; Wohlleben, W.; Jung, G.; Sussmuth, R.D. The biosynthesis of vancomycin-type glycopeptide antibiotics-The order of the cyclization steps. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2001, 40, 4688–4691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Forneris, C.C.; Seyedsayamdost, M.R. In vitro reconstitution of OxyC activity enables total chemoenzymatic syntheses of vancomycin aglycone variants. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2018, 57, 8048–8052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, C.; Liu, X.Q.; Lei, C.; Yan, H.; Shao, Z.H.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, G.P.; Wang, J.; Ding, X.M. RifZ(AMED_0655) is a pathway-specific regulator for rifamycin biosynthesis in Amycolatopsis mediterranei. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e03201-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lei, C.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhao, G.; Wang, J. A feedback regulatory model for RifQ-mediated repression of rifamycin export in &ITAmycolatopsis mediterranei&IT. Microb. Cell. Fact. 2018, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Chen, S.; Wu, Q.; Shen, Q.; Wang, H. Progress in understanding the genetic information and biosynthetic pathways behind Amycolatopsis antibiotics, with implications for the continued discovery of novel drugs. Chembiochem 2016, 17, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Setsuko, K.; Jie, L.; Hiroyasu, E.; Yohko, Y.; Naoko, K.; Yoshiko, H.; Masa, H.; Michiyo, O.; Masaaki, I.; Tomio, T. Kigamicins, novel antitumor antibiotics-I. Taxonomy, isolation, physico-chemical properties and biological activities. J. Antibiot. 2003, 56, 1004–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Li, X.M.; Wu, X.K.; Zhu, J.; Shen, Y.M. Amexanthomycins A–J, pentangular polyphenols produced by Amycolatopsis mediterranei S699 Delta rifA. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 689–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hopp, D.C.; Rabenstein, J.; Rhea, J.; Smith, C.; Romari, K.; Clarke, M.; Francis, L.; Irigoyen, M.; Milanowski, D.; Luche, M.; et al. Mutactimycin E, a new anthracycline antibiotic with gram-positive activity. J. Antibiot. 2008, 61, 675–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Kumar, C.G.; Mongolla, P.; Chandrasekhar, C.; Poornachandra, Y.; Siva, B.; Babu, K.S.; Ramakrishna, K.V.S. Anti-proliferative and antioxidant activities of 1-methoxy-3-methyl-8-hydroxy-anthraquinone, a hydroxyanthraquinoid extrolite produced by Amycolatopsis thermoflava strain SFMA-103. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett. 2017, 45, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chandrasekhar, C.; Rajpurohit, H.; Javaji, K.; Kuncha, M.; Setti, A.; Ali, A.Z.; Tiwari, A.K.; Misra, S.; Kumar, C.G. Anti-hyperglycemic and genotoxic studies of 1-O-methyl chrysophanol, a new anthraquinone isolated from Amycolatopsis thermoflava strain SFMA-103. Drug. Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 44, 148–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zheng, K.X.; Jiang, Y.; Jiang, J.X.; Huang, R.; He, J.; Wu, S.H. A new phthalazinone derivative and a new isoflavonoid glycoside from lichen-associated Amycolatopsis sp. Fitoterapia 2019, 135, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, C.S.; Jiang, Y.; Huang, R.; Jiang, B.G.; Zheng, K.X.; Wu, S.H. Diverse secondary metabolites from a lichen-derived Amycolatopsis Strain. Curr. Microbiol. 2020, 77, 2104–2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Bauermeister, A.; Calil, F.A.; Pinto, F.d.C.L.; Medeiros, T.C.T.; Almeida, L.C.; Silva, L.J.; de Melo, I.S.; Zucchi, T.D.; Costa-Lotufo, L.V.; Moraes, L.A.B. Pradimicin-IRD from Amycolatopsis sp. IRD-009 and its antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities. Natl. Prod. Res. 2019, 33, 1713–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guo, Z.K.; Wang, T.; Guo, Y.; Song, Y.C.; Tan, R.X.; Ge, H.M. Cytotoxic angucyclines from Amycolatopsis sp. HCa1, a rare actinobacteria derived from Oxya chinensis. Planta Med. 2011, 77, 2057–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Guo, Z.K.; Liu, S.B.; Jiao, R.H.; Wang, T.; Tan, R.X.; Ge, H.M. Angucyclines from an insect-derived actinobacterium Amycolatopsis sp. HCa1 and their cytotoxic activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 7490–7493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kwon, Y.; Kim, S.H.; Shin, Y.; Bae, M.; Kim, B.Y.; Lee, S.K.; Oh, K.B.; Shin, J.; Oh, D.C. A new benzofuran glycoside and indole alkaloids from a sponge-associated rare actinomycete, Amycolatopsis sp. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 2326–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Banskota, A.H.; McAlpine, J.B.; Sorensen, D.; Ibrahim, A.; Aouidate, M.; Piraee, M.; Alarco, A.M.; Farnet, C.M.; Zazopoulos, E. Genomic analyses lead to novel secondary metabolites. J. Antibiot. 2006, 59, 533–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hopmann, C.; Kurz, M.; Bronstrup, M.; Wink, J.; LeBeller, D. Isolation and structure elucidation of vancoresmycin—A new antibiotic from Amycolatopsis sp ST 101170. Tetrahedron. Lett. 2002, 43, 435–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Khalil, Z.G.; Salim, A.A.; Vuong, D.; Crombie, A.; Lacey, E.; Blumenthal, A.; Capon, R.J. Amycolatopsins A–C: Antimycobacterial glycosylated polyketide macrolides from the Australian soil Amycolatopsis sp. MST-108494. J. Antibiot. 2017, 70, 1097–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sheng, Y.; Fotso, S.; Serrill, J.D.; Shahab, S.; Santosa, D.A.; Ishmael, J.E.; Proteau, P.J.; Zabriskie, T.M.; Mahmud, T. Succinylated apoptolidins from Amycolatopsis sp. ICBB 8242. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 2526–2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Shi, Y.R.; Zhang, J.L.; Tian, X.Y.; Wu, X.K.; Li, T.H.; Lu, C.H.; Shen, Y.M. Isolation of 11,12-seco-Rifamycin W derivatives reveals a cleavage pattern of the rifamycin ansa chain. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 900–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Xiao, Y.S.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, M.; Guo, Z.K.; Deng, X.Z.; Shi, J.; Li, W.; Jiao, R.H.; Tan, R.X.; Ge, H.M. Rifamorpholines A–E, potential antibiotics from locust-associated actinobacteria Amycolatopsis sp. Hca4. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 3909–3916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Beemelmanns, C.; Ramadhar, T.R.; Kim, K.H.; Klassen, J.L.; Cao, S.; Wyche, T.P.; Hou, Y.; Poulsen, M.; Bugni, T.S.; Currie, C.R.; et al. Macrotermycins A–D, glycosylated macrolactams from a termite-associated Amycolatopsis sp. M39. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 1000–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, X.M.; Li, X.M.; Lu, C.H. Abscisic acid-type sesquiterpenes and ansamycins from Amycolatopsis alba DSM 44262. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 19, 946–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jayasuriya, H.; Herath, K.; Ondeyka, J.G.; Zhang, C.; Singh, S.B. Isolation and structure elucidation of thiazomycin—A potent thiazolyl peptide antibiotic from Amycolatopsis fastidiosa. J. Antibiot. 2007, 60, 554–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Zhang, C.; Zink, D.L.; Ushio, M.; Burgess, B.; Onishi, R.; Masurekar, P.; Barrett, J.F.; Singh, S.B. Isolation, structure, and antibacterial activity of thiazomycin A, a potent thiazolyl peptide antibiotic from Amycolatopsis fastidiosa. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 8818–8823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Singh, S.B.; Occi, J.; Jayasuriya, H.; Herath, K.; Motyl, M.; Dorso, K.; Gill, C.; Hickey, E.; Overbye, K.M.; Barrett, J.F.; et al. Antibacterial evaluations of thiazomycin-A potent thiazolyl peptide antibiotic from Amycolatopsis fastidiosa. J. Antibiot. 2007, 60, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Zhang, C.W.; Herath, K.; Jayasuriya, H.; Ondeyka, J.G.; Zink, D.L.; Occi, J.; Birdsall, G.; Venugopal, J.; Ushio, M.; Burgess, B.; et al. Thiazomycins, thiazolyl peptide antibiotics from Amycolatopsis fastidiosa. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 841–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pan, C.Q.; Kuranaga, T.; Liu, C.; Lu, S.; Shinzato, N.; Kakeya, H. Thioamycolamides A–E, sulfur-containing cycliclipopeptides produced by the rare Actinomycete Amycolatopsis sp. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 3014–3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Igarashi, M.; Sawa, R.; Kinoshita, N.; Hashizurne, H.; Nakagawa, N.; Homma, Y.; Nishimura, Y.; Akamatsu, Y. Pargamicin a, a novel cyclic peptide antibiotic from Amycolatopsis sp. J. Antibiot. 2008, 61, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hashizume, H.; Sawa, R.; Yamashita, K.; Nishimura, Y.; Igarashi, M. Structure and antibacterial activities of new cyclic peptide antibiotics, pargamicins B, C and D, from Amycolatopsis sp. ML1-hF4. J. Antibiot. 2017, 70, 699–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Hashizume, H.; Iijima, K.; Yamashita, K.; Kimura, T.; Wada, S.I.; Sawa, R.; Igarashi, M. Valgamicin C, a novel cyclic depsipeptide containing the unusual amino acid cleonine, and related valgamicins A, T and V produced by Amycolatopsis sp. ML1-hF4. J. Antibiot. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tsuji, N.; Kamigauchi, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Terui, Y. New glycopeptide antibiotics. 2. The isolation and structures of chloroorienticins. J. Antibiot. 1988, 41, 1506–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Box, S.J.; Elson, A.L.; Gilpin, M.L.; Winstanley, D.J. MM 47761 and MM 49721, glycopeptide antibiotics produced by a new strain of Amycolatopsis-orientalis-Isolation, purification and structure determination. J. Antibiot. 1990, 43, 931–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Berdnikova, T.F.; Shashkov, A.S.; Katrukha, G.S.; Lapchinskaya, O.A.; Yurkevich, N.V.; Grachev, A.A.; Nifant’ev, N.E. The structure of antibiotic eremomycin B. Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2009, 35, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kodani, S.; Komaki, H.; Suzuki, M.; Hemmi, H.; Ohnishi-Kameyama, M. Isolation and structure determination of new siderophore albachelin from Amycolatopsis alba. Biometals 2015, 28, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wu, Q.H.; Deering, R.W.; Zhang, G.Y.; Wang, B.X.; Li, X.; Sun, J.D.; Chen, J.W.; Zhang, H.W.; Rowley, D.C.; Wang, H. Albisporachelin, a new hydroxamate type siderophore from the deep ocean sediment-derived Actinomycete Amycolatopsis albispora WP1(T). Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Murakami, R.; Fujita, Y.; Kizuka, M.; Kagawa, T.; Muramatsu, Y.; Miyakoshi, S.; Takatsu, T.; Inukai, M. A-102395, a new inhibitor of bacterial translocase I, produced by Amycolatopsis sp. SANK 60206. J. Antibiot. 2007, 60, 690–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Li, X.; Li, X.; Zhu, J.; Wang, H.; Lu, C. Carbamothioic S-acid derivative and kigamicins, the activated production of silent metabolites in Amycolatopsis alba DSM 44262 Delta abm9 elicited by N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 34, 3514–3521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xu, X.D.; Han, L.; Zhao, L.X.; Chen, X.; Miao, C.P.; Hu, L.F.; Huang, X.S.; Chen, Y.M.; Li, Y.Q. Echinosporin antibiotics isolated from Amycolatopsis strain and their antifungal activity against root-rot pathogens of the Panax notoginseng. Folia. Microbiol. 2019, 64, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Izuta, S.; Kosaka, S.; Kawai, M.; Miyano, R.; Matsuo, H.; Matsumoto, A.; Nonaka, K.; Takahashi, Y.; Omura, S.; Nakashima, T. Dipyrimicin A and B, microbial compounds isolated from Amycolatopsis sp. K16-0194. J. Antibiot. 2018, 71, 535–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dasari, V.R.; Muthyala, M.K.; Nikku, M.Y.; Donthireddy, S.R. Novel Pyridinium compound from marine actinomycete, Amycolatopsis alba var. nov. DVR D4 showing antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities in vitro. Microbiol. Res. 2012, 167, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Lu, C.H.; Ye, F.W.; Shen, Y.M. Siderochelins with anti-mycobacterial activity from Amycolatopsis sp. LZ149. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2015, 13, 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Matsumoto, N.; Tsuchida, T.; Umekita, M.; Kinoshita, N.; Iinuma, H.; Sawa, T.; Hamada, M.; Takeuchi, T. Epoxyquinomicins A, B, C and D, new antibiotics from Amycolatopsis. 1. Taxonomy, fermentation, isolation and antimicrobial activities. J. Antibiot. 1997, 50, 900–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Breinholt, J.; Kulik, A.; Gurtler, H.; Fiedler, H.P. Tigloside: A new tigloylated tetrasaccharide from Amycolatopsis sp. Acta Chem. Scand. 1998, 52, 1239–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Guo, Z.K.; Jiao, R.H.; Dai, H.F.; Mei, W.L.; Tan, R.X.; Ge, H.M. Actinotetraoses I–K: Tetrasaccharide metabolites produced by an insect-derived Actinobacteria, Amycolatopsis sp. HCa1. Chem. Biodivers. 2013, 10, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Guo, Z.K.; Yan, W.; Tan, R.X.; Ge, H.M. Actinotetraose L, a new tetrasaccharide derivative isolated from the mycelia of Amycolatopsis sp. HCa1. J. Asian. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 17, 1109–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ma, S.Y.; Xiao, Y.S.; Zhang, B.; Shao, F.L.; Guo, Z.K.; Zhang, J.J.; Jiao, R.H.; Sun, Y.; Xu, Q.; Tan, R.X.; et al. Amycolamycins A and B, two enediyne-derived compounds from a locust-associated Actinomycete. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 6208–6211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ajila, C.M.; Brar, S.K.; Verma, M.; Tyagi, R.D.; Godbout, S.; Valero, J.R. Extraction and analysis of polyphenols: Recent trends. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2011, 31, 227–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chung, S.; Champagne, E.T. Using phenolic compounds to reduce the allergenic properties of peanut extracts and peanut butter slurries. J. Allergy. Clin. Immunol. 2008, 121, S249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lu, J.; Kunimoto, S.; Yamazaki, Y.; Kaminishi, M.; Esumi, H. Kigamicin D, a novel anticancer agent based on a new anti-austerity strategy targeting cancer cells’ tolerance to nutrient starvation. Cancer. Sci. 2004, 95, 547–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. De Almeida, L.C.; Bauermeister, A.; Rezende-Teixeira, P.; dos Santos, E.A.; Beraldo de Moraes, L.A.; Machado-Neto, J.A.; Costa-Lotufo, L.V. Pradimicin-IRD exhibits antineoplastic effects by inducing DNA damage in colon cancer cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2019, 168, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Butler, M.S.; Buss, A.D. Natural products-The future scaffolds for novel antibiotics? Biochem. Pharmacol. 2006, 71, 919–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kepplinger, B.; Morton-Laing, S.; Seistrup, K.H.; Marrs, E.C.L.; Hopkins, A.P.; Perry, J.D.; Strahl, H.; Hall, M.J.; Errington, J.; Allenby, N.E.E. Mode of action and heterologous expression of the natural product antibiotic vancoresmycin. ACS Chem. Biol. 2018, 13, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Griffith, R.S.; Peck, F.B., Jr. Comparative clinical laboratory studies of penicillin V and penicillin G. Antibiot. Annu. 1955, 3, 506–509. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Ong, Y.S.; Gao, L.; Kalesh, K.A.; Yu, Z.; Wang, J.; Liu, C.C.; Li, Y.; Sun, H.; Lee, S.S. Recent advances in ynthesis and identification of cyclic peptides for bioapplications. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2017, 17, 2302–2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lennard, K.R.; Tavassoli, A. Peptides come round: Using SICLOPPS Libraries for early stage drug discovery. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 10608–10614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hashizume, H.; Adachi, H.; Igarashi, M.; Nishimura, Y.; Akamatsu, Y. Biological activities of pargamicin A, a novel cyclic peptide antibiotic from Amycolatopsis sp. J. Antibiot. 2010, 63, 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yushchuk, O.; Binda, E.; Marinelli, F. Glycopeptide antibiotic resistance genes: Distribution and function in the producer Actinomycetes. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Matsumoto, N.; Iinuma, H.; Sawa, T.; Takeuchi, T.; Hirano, S.; Yoshioka, T.; Ishizuka, M. Epoxyquinomicins A, B, C and D, new antibiotics from Amycolatopsis. 2. Effect on type II collagen-induced arthritis in mice. J. Antibiot. 1997, 50, 906–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Costa, J.S.D.; Amoroso, M.J. Current biotechnological applications of the genus Amycolatopsis. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 30, 1919–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Cai, Z.Q.; Chen, Q.L.; Wang, H.Y.; He, Y.C.; Wang, W.; Zhao, X.Y.; Ye, Q.F. Degradation of the novel herbicide ZJ0273 by Amycolatopsis sp. M3-1 isolated from soil. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 96, 1371–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Der Beek, T.A.; Weber, F.A.; Bergmann, A.; Hickmann, S.; Ebert, I.; Hein, A.; Kuster, A. Pharmaceuticals in the environment-global occurrences and perspectives. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2016, 35, 823–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Alanis-Sanchez, B.M.; Perez-Tapia, S.M.; Vazquez-Leyva, S.; Mejia-Calvo, I.; Macias-Palacios, Z.; Vallejo-Castillo, L.; Flores-Ortiz, C.M.; Guerrero-Barajas, C.; Cruz-Maya, J.A.; Jan-Roblero, J. Utilization of naproxen by Amycolatopsis sp. Poz 14 and detection of the enzymes involved in the degradation metabolic pathway. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Butbunchu, N.; Pathom-Aree, W. Actinobacteria as promising candidate for polylactic acid type bioplastic degradation. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tan, Y.; Henehan, G.T.; Kinsella, G.K.; Ryan, B.J. An extracellular lipase from Amycolatopsis mediterannei is a cutinase with plastic degrading activity. Comput. Struct. Biotec. 2021, 19, 869–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Salvachua, D.; Karp, E.M.; Nimlos, C.T.; Vardon, D.R.; Beckham, G.T. Towards lignin consolidated bioprocessing: Simultaneous lignin depolymerization and product generation by bacteria. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 4951–4967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Fleige, C.; Hansen, G.; Kroll, J.; Steinbuchel, A. Investigation of the Amycolatopsis sp. Strain ATCC 39116 vanillin dehydrogenase and its impact on the biotechnical production of vanillin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Zong, H.; Zhuge, B.; Lu, X.Y.; Huo, X.Y.; Fang, H.Y.; Song, J.; Sun, J. Characterization of a novel cytochrome P450 from Amycolatopsis sp. CGMCC1149 for hydroxylation of lovastatin. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2015, 62, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zong, H.; Zhuge, B.; Fang, H.Y.; Cao, Y.H.; Mu, L.; Fu, W.L.; Song, J.; Zhuge, J. Advances in the bioconversion mechanism of lovastatin to wuxistatin by Amycolatopsis sp. CGMCC 1149. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 599–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Albarracin, V.H.; Winik, B.; Kothe, E.; Amoroso, M.J.; Abate, C.M. Copper bioaccumulation by the actinobacterium Amycolatopsis sp. ABO. J. Basic Microbiol. 2008, 48, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Albarracin, V.H.; Alonso-Vega, P.; Trujijjo, M.E.; Amoroso, M.J.; Abate, C.M. Amycolatopsis tucumanensis sp. nov., a copper-resistant actinobacterium isolated from polluted sediments. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 397–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Colin, V.L.; Villegas, L.B.; Abate, C.M. Indigenous microorganisms as potential bioremediators for environments contaminated with heavy metals. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2012, 69, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Colin, V.L.; Castro, M.F.; Amoroso, M.J.; Villegas, L.B. Production of bioemulsifiers by Amycolatopsis tucumanensis DSM 45259 and their potential application in remediation technologies for soils contaminated with hexavalent chromium. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 261, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. El Baz, S.; Baz, M.; Barakate, M.; Hassani, L.; El Gharmali, A.; Imziln, B. Resistance to and accumulation of heavy metals by actinobacteria isolated from abandoned mining areas. Sci. World J. 2015, 2015, 761834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Kishimoto, S.; Tsunematsu, Y.; Sato, M.; Watanabe, K. Elucidation of biosynthetic pathways of natural products. Chem. Rec. 2017, 17, 1095–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Cai, W.L.; Goswami, A.; Yang, Z.Y.; Liu, X.D.; Green, K.D.; Barnard-Britson, S.; Baba, S.; Funabashi, M.; Nonaka, K.; Sunkara, M.; et al. The biosynthesis of capuramycin-type antibiotics identification of the A-102395 biosynthetic gene cluster, mechanism of self-resistance, and formation of uridine-5′-carboxamide. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 13710–13724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Matsumoto, N.; Ariga, A.; To-e, S.; Nakamura, H.; Agata, N.; Hirano, S.; Inoue, J.; Umezawa, K. Synthesis of NF-κβ activation inhibitors derived from epoxyquinomicin C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 865–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Nigam, A.; Almabruk, K.H.; Saxena, A.; Yang, J.; Mukherjee, U.; Kaur, H.; Kohli, P.; Kumari, R.; Singh, P.; Zakharov, L.N.; et al. Modification of rifamycin polyketide backbone leads to improved drug activity against rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 21142–21152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Singhvi, N.; Singh, P.; Prakash, O.; Gupta, V.; Lal, S.; Bechthold, A.; Singh, Y.; Singh, R.K.; Lal, R. Differential mass spectrometry-based proteome analyses unveil major regulatory hubs in rifamycin B production in Amycolatopsis mediterranei. J. Proteom. 2021, 104168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Lesnik, U.; Lukezic, T.; Podgorsek, A.; Horvat, J.; Polak, T.; Sala, M.; Jenko, B.; Harmrolfs, K.; Ocampo-Sosa, A.; Martinez-Martinez, L.; et al. Construction of a new class of tetracycline lead structures with potent antibacterial activity through biosynthetic engineering. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2015, 54, 3937–3940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lukezic, T.; Lesnik, U.; Podgorsek, A.; Horvat, J.; Polak, T.; Sala, M.; Jenko, B.; Raspor, P.; Herron, P.R.; Hunter, I.S.; et al. Identification of the chelocardin biosynthetic gene cluster from Amycolatopsis sulphurea: A platform for producing novel tetracycline antibiotics. Microbiology 2013, 159, 2524–2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Blin, K.; Shaw, S.; Steinke, K.; Villebro, R.; Ziemert, N.; Lee, S.Y.; Medema, M.H.; Weber, T. antiSMASH 5.0: Updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W81–W87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Skinnider, M.A.; Merwin, N.J.; Johnston, C.W.; Magarvey, N.A. PRISM 3: Expanded prediction of natural product chemical structures from microbial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, W49–W54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Bergeijk, D.A.V.; Terlouw, B.R.; Medema, M.H.; Wezel, G.P.V. Ecology and genomics of Actinobacteria: New concepts for natural product discovery. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 546–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Pan, C.; Kuranaga, T.; Cao, X.; Suzuki, T.; Dohmae, N.; Shinzato, N.; Onaka, H.; Kakeya, H. Amycolapeptins A and B, cyclic nonadepsipeptides produced by combined-culture of Amycolatopsis sp. and Tsukamurella pulmonis. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 86, 1843–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 26 01884 g001 550
Figure 1. Structures of polyphenols (1–41) from Amycolatopsis.
Figure 1. Structures of polyphenols (1–41) from Amycolatopsis.
Molecules 26 01884 g001
Molecules 26 01884 g002 550
Figure 2. Structures of linear polyketides (42–48) and macrolides (49–58) from Amycolatopsis.
Figure 2. Structures of linear polyketides (42–48) and macrolides (49–58) from Amycolatopsis.
Molecules 26 01884 g002
Molecules 26 01884 g003 550
Figure 3. Structures of macrolactams (59–79) from Amycolatopsis.
Figure 3. Structures of macrolactams (59–79) from Amycolatopsis.
Molecules 26 01884 g003
Molecules 26 01884 g004 550
Figure 4. Structures of thiazolyl peptides (80–97) and cyclic peptides (98–105) from Amycolatopsis.
Figure 4. Structures of thiazolyl peptides (80–97) and cyclic peptides (98–105) from Amycolatopsis.
Molecules 26 01884 g004
Molecules 26 01884 g005 550
Figure 5. Structures of glycopeptides (106–118) from Amycolatopsis.
Figure 5. Structures of glycopeptides (106–118) from Amycolatopsis.
Molecules 26 01884 g005
Molecules 26 01884 g006 550
Figure 6. Structures of amide derivatives (119–146) from Amycolatopsis.
Figure 6. Structures of amide derivatives (119–146) from Amycolatopsis.
Molecules 26 01884 g006
Molecules 26 01884 g007 550
Figure 7. Structures of glycoside derivatives (147–155), enediyne derivatives (156–157) and sesquiterpenes (158–159) from Amycolatopsis.
Figure 7. Structures of glycoside derivatives (147–155), enediyne derivatives (156–157) and sesquiterpenes (158–159) from Amycolatopsis.
Molecules 26 01884 g007
Molecules 26 01884 g008 550
Figure 8. (A) The gene clusters of amexanthomycins A–J. (B) The biosynthetic pathway of amexanthomycins A–J [14].
Figure 8. (A) The gene clusters of amexanthomycins A–J. (B) The biosynthetic pathway of amexanthomycins A–J [14].
Molecules 26 01884 g008
Molecules 26 01884 g009 550
Figure 9. The biosynthetic pathway of ECO-0501 (47) [24].
Figure 9. The biosynthetic pathway of ECO-0501 (47) [24].
Molecules 26 01884 g009
Molecules 26 01884 g010 550
Figure 10. The biosynthetic pathway of rifamorpholines A–E [29].
Figure 10. The biosynthetic pathway of rifamorpholines A–E [29].
Molecules 26 01884 g010
Molecules 26 01884 g011 550
Figure 11. The biosynthetic pathway of A-102395 [84].
Figure 11. The biosynthetic pathway of A-102395 [84].
Molecules 26 01884 g011
Molecules 26 01884 g012 550
Figure 12. The biosynthetic pathway of amycolamycins A and B [55].
Figure 12. The biosynthetic pathway of amycolamycins A and B [55].
Molecules 26 01884 g012
Molecules 26 01884 g013 550
Figure 13. The chemical synthesis pathway of DHM2EQ [85].
Figure 13. The chemical synthesis pathway of DHM2EQ [85].
Molecules 26 01884 g013
Molecules 26 01884 g014 550
Figure 14. The semi-synthesis pathway of 24-desmethylrifampicin [86,87].
Figure 14. The semi-synthesis pathway of 24-desmethylrifampicin [86,87].
Molecules 26 01884 g014
Molecules 26 01884 g015 550
Figure 15. The biosynthesis pathway of CDCHD [88,89].
Figure 15. The biosynthesis pathway of CDCHD [88,89].
Molecules 26 01884 g015
Table
Table 1. Secondary metabolites with sources, CAS registry numbers, and habitats from the genus Amycolatopsis during 1990–2020.
Table 1. Secondary metabolites with sources, CAS registry numbers, and habitats from the genus Amycolatopsis during 1990–2020.
Structure TypesCompoundsSourcesCAS Registry NumbersHabitats
(T/M b)		Refs.
PolyphenolsKigamicin A (1)Amycolatopsis sp. ML630-mF1680571-49-7Soil (T)[13]
Kigamicin B (2)Amycolatopsis sp. ML630-mF1680571-50-0Soil (T)[13]
Kigamicin C (3)Amycolatopsis sp. ML630-mF1680571-51-1Soil (T)[13]
Kigamicin D (4)Amycolatopsis sp. ML630-mF1680571-52-2Soil (T)[13]
Kigamicin E (5)Amycolatopsis sp. ML630-mF1680571-53-3Soil (T)[13]
Amexanthomycin A (6)A. mediterranei S699 ∆rifA/a-c[14]
Amexanthomycin B (7)A.mediterranei S699 ∆rifA/-[14]
Amexanthomycin C (8)A. mediterranei S699 ∆rifA/-[14]
Amexanthomycin D (9)A. mediterranei S699 ∆rifA/-[14]
Amexanthomycin E (10)A. mediterranei S699 ∆rifA/-[14]
Amexanthomycin F (11)A. mediterranei S699 ∆rifA/-[14]
Amexanthomycin G (12)A. mediterranei S699 ∆rifA/-[14]
Amexanthomycin H (13/)A. mediterranei S699 ∆rifA/-[14]
Amexanthomycin I (14)A. mediterranei S699 ∆rifA/-[14]
Amexanthomycin J (15)A. mediterranei S699 ∆rifA/-[14]
Mutactimycin E (16)Amycolatopsis sp. 171281125635-23-5Soil (T)[15]
Mutactimycin A (17)Amycolatopsis sp. 17128131749-16-1Soil (T)[15]
Mutactimycin D (18)Amycolatopsis sp. 17128138689-82-4Soil (T)[15]
1-Methoxy-3-methyl-8-hydroxy-anthraquinone (19)A. thermoflava SFMA-10367116-22-7Soil (T)[16,17]
7-O-Methyl-5-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosylgenestein (20)Amycolatopsis sp. YIM 130642/Squamarina sp. (T)[18]
7-O-α-D-Arabinofuranosyl daidzein (21)Amycolatopsis sp. YIM 130642602329-64-6Squamarina sp. (T)[18]
Prunetin (22)Amycolatopsis sp. YIM 130642552-59-0Squamarina sp. (T)[18]
Kakkatin (23)Amycolatopsis sp. YIM 13064257960-04-0Squamarina sp. (T)[18]
Isoformononetin (24)Amycolatopsis sp. YIM 130642486-63-5Squamarina sp. (T)[18]
Genistein (25)Amycolatopsis sp. YIM 130642446-72-0Squamarina sp. (T)[18]
Formononetin (26)Amycolatopsis sp. YIM 130642485-72-3Squamarina sp. (T)[18]
Sorbicillin (27)Amycolatopsis sp. YIM 13068779950-85-9P. borreri (T)[19]
Pradimicin-IRD (28)Amycolatopsis sp. IRD-0092226037-84-7Soil (T)[20]
(2R,3R)-2-Hydroxy-8-O-methyltetrangomycin (29)Amycolatopsis sp. Hca1 1391860-71-1O. chinensis (T)[21]
(2R,3R)-2-Hydroxy-5-O-methyltetrangomycin (30)Amycolatopsis sp. Hca1 1391860-72-2O. chinensis (T)[21]
Amycomycin A (31)Amycolatopsis sp. Hca1 1415935-15-7O. chinensis (T)[22]
Amycomycin B (32)Amycolatopsis sp. Hca1 1415935-16-8O. chinensis (T)[22]
Tetrangomycin (33)Amycolatopsis sp. Hca1 7351-08-8O. chinensis (T)[21]
Pd116779 (34)Amycolatopsis sp. Hca1 102674-89-5O. chinensis (T)[21]
Tetrangulol (35)Amycolatopsis sp. Hca1 7414-92-8O. chinensis (T)[21]
X-14881e (36)Amycolatopsis sp. Hca1 85178-50-3O. chinensis (T)[21]
Sakyomicin B (37)Amycolatopsis sp. Hca1 86470-27-1O. chinensis (T)[21]
Tetracyclinone (38)Amycolatopsis sp. Hca1 86413-78-7O. chinensis (T)[21]
Sakyomicin A (39)Amycolatopsis sp. Hca1 86413-75-4O. chinensis (T)[21]
Sakyomicin C (40)Amycolatopsis sp. Hca1 86413-76-5O. chinensis (T)[21]
Amycofuran (41)A. saalfeldensis/Sponge (M)[23]
Linear polyketidesECO-0501 (42)A. orientalis ATCC 43,491 848087-04-7-[24]
Modified analogs of ECO-0501 (43–47)A. orientalis ATCC 43,491 848087-07-0, 848087-06-9, 848087-08-1, 848087-09-2, 921224-72-8-[24]
Vancoresmycin (48)Amycolatopsis sp. ST 101170268728-82-1-[25]
MacrolidesAmycolatopsin A (49)Amycolatopsis sp. MST-1084942209112-96-7Soil (T)[26]
Amycolatopsin B (50)Amycolatopsis sp. MST-1084942209112-97-8Soil (T)[26]
Amycolatopsin C (51)Amycolatopsis sp. MST-1084942209112-98-9Soil (T)[26]
2′-O-Succinyl-apoptolidin A (52)Amycolatopsis sp. ICBB 82421778681-11-0Borneo (M)[27]
3′-O-Succinyl-apoptolidin A (53)Amycolatopsis sp. ICBB 82421778681-12-1Borneo (M)[27]
Apoptolidin A (54)Amycolatopsis sp. ICBB 8242194874-06-1Borneo (M)[27]
Apoptolidin B (55)Amycolatopsis sp. ICBB 8242861994-72-1Borneo (M)[27]
Apoptolidin C (56)Amycolatopsis sp. ICBB 8242861994-73-2Borneo (M)[27]
Apoptolidin D (57)Amycolatopsis sp. ICBB 8242929641-83-8Borneo (M)[27]
Isoapoptolidin A (58)Amycolatopsis sp. ICBB 8242476647-30-0Borneo (M)[27]
MacrolactamsRifamycinoside A (59)A. mediterranei S6992329704-84-7-[28]
Rifamycinoside B (60)A. mediterranei S6992329704-85-8-[28]
28-Desmethyl-28-hydroxyrifamycin W (61)A. mediterranei S6992329704-86-9-[28]
27,28-Epoxy-28-desmethylrifamycin W (62)A. mediterranei S6992329704-87-0-[28]
30-Hydroxyrifamycin W hemiacetal (63)A. mediterranei S6992329704-88-1-[28]
20-Hydroxyrifamycin S (64)A. mediterranei S699/-[28]
Rifamycin S (65)A. mediterranei S69913553-79-2-[28]
16,17-Dehydrorifamycin G (66)A. mediterranei S69975922-16-6-[28]
Rifamycin O (67)A. mediterranei S69914487-05-9-[28]
Rifamycin Z (68)A. mediterranei S69979486-49-0-[28]
Rifamycin W (69)A. mediterranei S69953904-81-7-[28]
Rifamorpholine A (70)Amycolatopsis sp. HCa42101982-41-4L. migratoria (T)[29]
Rifamorpholine B (71)Amycolatopsis sp. HCa42101982-45-8L. migratoria (T)[29]
Rifamorpholine C (72)Amycolatopsis sp. HCa42101982-52-7L. migratoria (T)[29]
Rifamorpholine D (73)Amycolatopsis sp. HCa42101982-58-3L. migratoria (T)[29]
Rifamorpholine E (74)Amycolatopsis sp. HCa42101982-62-9L. migratoria (T)[29]
Macrotermycin A (75)Amycolatopsis sp. M39 1311284-73-7M. natalensis (T)[30]
Macrotermycin B (76)Amycolatopsis sp. M39 2095035-09-7M. natalensis (T)[30]
Macrotermycin C (77)Amycolatopsis sp. M39 2095035-10-0M. natalensis (T)[30]
Macrotermycin D (78)Amycolatopsis sp. M39 2095035-11-1M. natalensis (T)[30]
Ansamycin (79)A. alba DSM 442622256052-40-9-[31]
Thiazolyl peptidesNocathiacin I (80)A. fastidiosa214044-52-7-[32,33,34]
Nocathiacin II (81)A. fastidiosa256230-46-3-[32,33]
Nocathiacin III (82)A. fastidiosa256230-47-4-[32,33]
Nocathiacin IV (83)A. fastidiosa400650-12-6-[32,33]
Thiazomycin (84)A. fastidiosa905946-70-5-[32,33,34]
Thiazomycin A (85)A. fastidiosa905978-04-3-[33]
Mj347-81f4 b (86)A. fastidiosa214044-53-8-[35]
Thiazomycin B (87)A. fastidiosa905946-73-8-[35]
Thiazomycin C (88)A. fastidiosa851664-21-6-[35]
Thiazomycin D (89)A. fastidiosa905946-71-6-[35]
Thiazomycin E1 (90)A. fastidiosa905946-72-7-[35]
Thiazomycin E2 (91)A. fastidiosa905946-75-0-[35]
Thiazomycin E3 (92)A. fastidiosa905946-76-1-[35]
Thioamycolamide A (93)Amycolatopsis sp. 26−4/Iriomote Island (T)[36]
Thioamycolamide B (94)Amycolatopsis sp. 26−4/Iriomote Island (T)[36]
Thioamycolamide C (95)Amycolatopsis sp. 26−4/Iriomote Island (T)[36]
Thioamycolamide D (96)Amycolatopsis sp. 26−4/Iriomote Island (T)[36]
Thioamycolamide E (97)Amycolatopsis sp. 26−4/Iriomote Island (T)[36]
Cyclic peptidesPRG-A (98)Amycolatopsis sp. ML1-hF4421547-03-7Soil (T)[37]
PRG-B (99)Amycolatopsis sp. ML1-hF42112795-88-5Soil (T)[38]
PRG-C (100)Amycolatopsis sp. ML1-hF42112795-89-6Soil (T)[38]
PRG-D (101)Amycolatopsis sp. ML1-hF42112795-90-9Soil (T)[38]
Valgamicin A (102)Amycolatopsis sp. ML1-hF42271221-78-2Soil (T)[39]
Valgamicin C (103)Amycolatopsis sp. ML1-hF42271221-79-3Soil (T)[39]
Valgamicin T (104)Amycolatopsis sp. ML1-hF42271221-80-6Soil (T)[39]
Valgamicin V (105)Amycolatopsis sp. ML1-hF42271221-81-7Soil (T)[39]
GlycopeptidesChloroorienticin A (106)A. orientalis PA-45052118395-73-6-[40]
Chloroorienticin B (107)A. orientalis PA-45052118373-81-2-[40]
Chloroorienticin C (108)A. orientalis PA-45052118373-82-3-[40]
Chloroorienticin D (109)A. orientalis PA-45052118373-83-4-[40]
Chloroorienticin E (110)A. orientalis PA-45052118373-84-5-[40]
Orienticin A (111)A. orientalis PA-45052111073-20-2-[40]
Orienticin D (112)A. orientalis PA-45052112848-46-1-[40]
Vancomycin (113)A. orientalis PA-450521404-90-6-[40]
Vancomycin aglycone (114)A. orientalis PA-4505282198-76-3-[40]
MM 47,761 (115)A. orientalis NCBI 12608126985-51-1-[41]
MM 49,721 (116)A. orientalis NCBI 12608126985-52-2-[41]
Eremomycin B (117)A. orientalis subsp. Eremomycini1193347-07-7-[42]
Eremomycin (118)A. orientalis subsp. Eremomycini110865-90-2-[42]
Amide derivativesAlbachelin (119)A. alba2055362-14-4-[43]
Albisporachelin (120)A. albispora WP1T/Sediment (M)[44]
A-102395 (121)Amycolatopsis sp. SANK 602061003904-77-5Soil (T)[45]
Amycocyclopiazonic acid (122)A. saalfeldensis/Sponge (M)[23]
Amycolactam (123)A. saalfeldensis/Sponge (M)[23]
Carbamothioic S-acid (124)A. alba DSM 44262∆abm9/-[46]
Amycophthalazinone A (125)Amycolatopsis sp. YIM 130642/Squamarina sp. (T)[18]
2-Pyruvoylaminobenzamide (126)Amycolatopsis sp. YIM 13068718326-62-0P. borreri (T)[19]
(−)-Chrysogine (127)Amycolatopsis sp. YIM 13068742599-89-3P. borreri (T)[19]
4-(3-Methylbut-2-enyloxy) benzamide (128)Amycolatopsis sp. YIM 130687116208-80-1P. borreri (T)[19]
Acetotryptamide (129)Amycolatopsis sp. YIM 1306871016-47-3P. borreri (T)[19]
2-Acetamidophenol (130)Amycolatopsis sp. YIM 130687614-80-2P. borreri (T)[19]
Anthranilic acid (131)Amycolatopsis sp. YIM 130687118-92-3P. borreri (T)[19]
Phenacetamide (132)Amycolatopsis sp. YIM 130687103-81-1P. borreri (T)[19]
2-Carbamoyl-3-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone (133)Amycolatopsis sp. YIM 130687103646-20-4P. borreri (T)[19]
Echinosporin (134)Amycolatopsis sp. YIM PH2052079127-35-8Soil (T)[47]
7-Deoxyechinosporin (135)Amycolatopsis sp. YIM PH20520431945-10-7Soil (T)[47]
Dipyrimicin A (136) Amycolatopsis sp. K16-01941235020-43-5-[48]
Dipyrimicin B (137)Amycolatopsis sp. K16-01941332747-97-3-[48]
1-(10-Aminodecyl) pyridinium (138)A. alba var. nov. DVR D41421439-67-9Sediment (M)[49]
Siderochelin A (139)Amycolatopsis sp. LZ14977550-87-9Cynodon dactylon (T)[50]
Siderochelin B (140) Amycolatopsis sp. LZ1492252179-56-7Cynodon dactylon (T)[50]
Siderochelin C (141) Amycolatopsis sp. LZ1492252179-55-6Cynodon dactylon (T)[50]
Siderochelin D (142) Amycolatopsis sp. LZ1492249835-41-2Cynodon dactylon (T)[50]
Epoxyquinomicin A (143)A. sulphurea MK299-95F4175448-31-4Soil (T)[51]
Epoxyquinomicin B (144)A. sulphurea MK299-95F4175448-32-5Soil (T)[51]
Epoxyquinomicin C (145)A. sulphurea MK299-95F4200496-85-1Soil (T)[51]
Epoxyquinomicin D (146)A. sulphurea MK299-95F4200496-86-2Soil (T)[51]
Glycoside derivativesTigloside (147)Amycolatopsis sp. NN0 21702216590-44-2-[52]
2,2′-Di-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-α-D- glucopyranosyl α-D- glucopyranoside (148)Amycolatopsis sp. NN0 21702/-[52]
Actinotetraose I (149)Amycolatopsis sp. HCa11427319-31-0O. chinensis (T)[53]
Actinotetraose J (150)Amycolatopsis sp. HCa11427319-40-1O. chinensis (T)[53]
Actinotetraose K (151)Amycolatopsis sp. HCa11427319-41-2O. chinensis (T)[53]
Actinotetraose A (152)Amycolatopsis sp. HCa11421368-85-5O. chinensis (T)[53]
Actinotetraose B (153)Amycolatopsis sp. HCa11421368-86-6O. chinensis (T)[53]
Actinotetraose C (154)Amycolatopsis sp. HCa11421368-87-7O. chinensis (T)[53]
Actinotetraose L (155)Amycolatopsis sp. HCa1216590-44-2O. chinensis (T)[54]
Enediyne derivativesAmycolamycin A (156)Amycolatopsis sp. HCa42243041-65-6L. migratoria (T)[55]
Amycolamycin B (157)Amycolatopsis sp. HCa42243041-66-7L. migratoria (T)[55]
Sesquiterpenes(E)-3-methyl-5-(2,6,6-trimthyl-3-oxocyclohex-1-enyl) pent-2-enoic acid (158)A. alba DSM 442622247139-21-3-[31]
(E)-3-methyl-5-(2,6,6- trimthyl-4-oxocyclohex-2-enyl) pent-2-en-oic acid (159)A. alba DSM 442622256051-20-2-[31]
a The CAS registry number was not found; b T: terrestrial environment; M: marine environment; c The habitat was not mentioned.
Table
Table 2. The antimicrobial, cytotoxic and other bioactivities of secondary metabolites from Amycolatopsis.
Table 2. The antimicrobial, cytotoxic and other bioactivities of secondary metabolites from Amycolatopsis.
Activity TypesCompoundsBioactivities (MIC, μg/mL or IC50, μM)Refs.
Antimicrobial activitiesKigamicins A–E (1–5)MRSA (0.03–0.22 μM)[13]
Mutactimycin E (16)MRSA, S. pneumonia, E. faecium (1–16 μg/mL)[15]
7-O-Methyl-5-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosylgenestein (20) and 7-O-α-D-arabinofuranosyl daidzein (21)C. albicans, E. coli, MRSA, S. aureus, and S. typhi (32–256 μg/mL)[18]
Pradimicin-IRD (28)S. agalactiae, S. aureus and P. aeruginosa (3.15 μg/mL)[20]
ECO-0501 (42)MRSA (0.125–0.25 μg/mL)[24]
Vancoresmycin (48)MRSA, E. faecium, E. faecalis (0.05 μM)[25]
Amycolatopsins A, C (49, 51)M. bovis (0.4 and 2.7 μM)
M. tuberculosis (4.4 and 5.7 μM)		[26]
Rifamorpholine B (71)MRSA, S. aureus, S. pyogenes, B. subtilis, M. luteus (0.5–4.0 μM)[29]
Rifamorpholine D (73)MRSA, S. aureus, S. pyogenes, B. subtilis, M. luteus (1.0–8.0 μM)[29]
Macrotermycin A (75)B. subtilis, S. aureus, S. cerevisiae, C. albicans (1.0–10 μg/mL)[29]
Macrotermycin C (77)B. subtilis, S. aureus, S. cerevisiae, C. albicans (10–25 μg/mL)[29]
Thiazomycin (84) and thiazomycins A–D (85, 87–89)S. aureus, E. faecalis, S. pneumonia and their drug-resistant type (0.002–0.06 μg/mL)[31,32,33,34]
PRG-A, C (98, 100)MRSA, E. faecalis, M. luteus, B. subtilis (0.72 μM)[37,38]
PRG-B, D (99, 101)MRSA, E. faecalis, M. luteus, B. subtilis (5.62–23.37 μM)[38]
Chloroorienticins A–E (106–110)S. aureus JC-1 and MRSA (0.2–0.78 μg/mL)[40]
Vancomycin (113)S. aureus JC-1 (0.78 μg/mL) and MRSA (1.58 μg/mL)[40]
MM 47,761 (115) and MM 49,721 (116)B. subtilis ATCC6633, C. xerosis NCTC9755, M. luteus NCTC8340, S. aureus, S. saprophyticus FL1, S. epidermidis 60137, S. pyogenes CN10, S. agalactiae Hester, S. sanguis ATCC 10556, S. faecalis I (0.5–8 μg/mL)[41]
Amycophthalazinone A (125)S. aureus, S. typhi, C. albicans (6.92–13.84 μM)[18]
Echinosporin (134)F. oxysporum, F. solani, A. panax, and P. herbarum (32–128 μg/mL)[47]
7-deoxyechinosporin (135)F. oxysporum, F. solani, A. panax, and P. herbarum (32–128 μg/mL)[47]
Dipyrimicin A (136) S. cerevisiae, Kocuria rhizophila, B. subtilis, Escherichia coli NIHJ, Xanthomonas campestris pv. oryzae KB 88 (16–21 mm)[48]
Siderochelin A (139)Bacillus pumilus, B. subtilis, E. coli and S. aureus (10–15 mm)[50]
Epoxyquinomicins A (143) and B (144)M. luteus IFO3333, M. luteus PCI1001 (3.12–6.25 μg/mL)[51]
Cytotoxic activityKigamicin D (4)Mouse tumor cell lines
LB32T, L-1210, EL-4, P388D1, B16BL6, FS3, Colon26 (0.95 μM)		[13]
1-methoxy-3-methyl-8-hydroxy-anthraquinone (19)Lung cancer (10.3 µM)
Lymphoblastic leukemia cells (16.98 µM)		[17]
Pradimicin-IRD (28)HCT-116 (0.8 μM), MM 200 (2.7 μM), MCF-7 (1.55 μM), RPE (1.48 μM)[20]
Tetrangomycin (33)HeLa cells (0.27 μM)[21]
Pd116779 (34)HeLa cells (0.11 μM)[21]
Sakyomicin A (39) HeLa cells (0.56 μM)[21]
Sakyomicin C (40)HeLa cells (0.39 μM)[21]
Amycolatopsins A, B (49, 50)SW620 (0.08 and 0.14 μM)
NCIH-460 (1.2 and 0.28 μM)		[26]
3′-O-succinyl-apoptolidin A (52)H292 cells (0.09 μM)[27]
2′-O-succinyl-apoptolidin A (53)H292 cells (0.08 μM)[27]
Apoptolidin A (54)H292 cells (0.02 μM), HeLa cells (0.04 μM)[27]
Thioamycolamides A, D (93, 96)HT1080(11.94 and 21.22 μM)
HeLa S3(6.53 and 9.34 μM)		[27]
Valgamicin V (105)MIA Paca 2, HGC-27, GSS, 5637, NCI-H1650, NB16, ME-180, HSC-490 (6.6–21.6 μM)[39]
Amycolactam (123)SNU638 (0.8 μM)
HCT116 (2.0 μM)		[23]
Dipyrimicin A (136)Hela 3S, HT29, A549, H1299, Panc1, THP-1, Jarkat, HL-60 (3.9–9.4 μM)[48]
Dipyrimicin B (137)H1299 cell (6.8 ± 3.3 μM)[48]
Amycolamycin A (156) M231 (7.9 μM)[55]
Other activitiesAmexanthomycins A–C (6–8)Inhibiting human DNA Topo IIα[14]
1-methoxy-3-methyl-8-hydroxy-anthraquinone (19)Antioxidant
Anti-hyperglycemic		[17]
Rifamycinoside A and B (59–60), 28-Desmethyl-28-hydroxyrifamycin W (61),30-Hydroxyrifamycin W hemiacetal (63), Rifamycin O (67)Inhibiting human DNA Topo I (50 and 100 μM)[28]
Rifamycinoside A and B (59–60),
28-Desmethyl-28-hydroxyrifamycin W (61),30-Hydroxyrifamycin W hemiacetal (63), Rifamycin S, O and Z (65, 67 and 68)		Inhibiting human DNA Topo IIα (50 μM)[28]
20-hydroxyrifamycin S (64)Inducing G2/M phase arrest
Causing DNA damage in HCT116		[28]
A-102395 (121)Inhibiting bacterial translocase I (0.01 μM)[45]
Epoxyquinomicins C (145) and D (146)Inhibiting type II collagen-induced arthritis[51]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Song, Z.; Xu, T.; Wang, J.; Hou, Y.; Liu, C.; Liu, S.; Wu, S. Secondary Metabolites of the Genus Amycolatopsis: Structures, Bioactivities and Biosynthesis. Molecules 2021, 26, 1884. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26071884

AMA Style

Song Z, Xu T, Wang J, Hou Y, Liu C, Liu S, Wu S. Secondary Metabolites of the Genus Amycolatopsis: Structures, Bioactivities and Biosynthesis. Molecules. 2021; 26(7):1884. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26071884

Chicago/Turabian Style

Song, Zhiqiang, Tangchang Xu, Junfei Wang, Yage Hou, Chuansheng Liu, Sisi Liu, and Shaohua Wu. 2021. "Secondary Metabolites of the Genus Amycolatopsis: Structures, Bioactivities and Biosynthesis" Molecules 26, no. 7: 1884. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26071884

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop