Next Article in Journal
LED Technology Applied to Plant Development for Promoting the Accumulation of Bioactive Compounds: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Defense against Herbivory in the Brown Marine Macroalga Padina gymnospora Could Be Attributed to a New Hydrocarbon Compound
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Root Rot of Cinnamomum camphora (Linn) Presl Caused by Phytopythium vexans in China

Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(5), 1072; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12051072
Submission received: 29 January 2023 / Revised: 12 February 2023 / Accepted: 23 February 2023 / Published: 28 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Protection and Biotic Interactions)

Abstract

:
As a famous street tree, camphor (Cinnamomum camphora) is widely planted worldwide. However, in recent years, camphor with root rot was observed in Anhui Province, China. Based on morphological characterization, thirty virulent isolates were identified as Phytopythium species. Phylogenetic analysis of combined ITS, LSU rDNA, β-tubulin, coxI, and coxII sequences assigned the isolates to Phytopythium vexans. Koch’s postulates were fulfilled in the greenhouse, and the pathogenicity of P. vexans was determined by root inoculation tests on 2-year-old camphor seedlings; the symptoms of indoor inoculation were consistent with those in the field. P. vexans can grow at 15–30 °C, with an optimal growth temperature of 25–30 °C. The results of fungicide sensitivity experiments indicated that P. vexans was the most sensitive to metalaxyl hymexazol, which may be a useful idea for the future prevention and control management of P.vexans. This study provided the first step for further research on P. vexans as a pathogen of camphor, and provided a theoretical basis for future control strategies.

1. Introduction

The camphor tree [Cinnamomum camphora (Linn.) Presl] is an important species of subtropical evergreen broad-leaved tree [1] that is widely distributed in Asia [2]. The tree is native to China and is often regarded as both an ornamental tree and a street tree because of its tallness and beauty [3]. Camphor is economically valuable in many ways. As one of the oldest traditional herbal medicines, it has antibacterial, antioxidant and other biological functions [4,5,6]. Camphor is usually used as a raw material for producing camphor pills [4], wood [4], essential oils [7], and perfumes [8]. Medicinal products made from camphor trees can be used to treat inflammation-related diseases such as sprains, bronchitis and rheumatism, and camphor leaves can also be made into camphor balls with different chemical components [7,9]. However, in the nursery land of the city of Xuancheng, Anhui Province, China, a large number of camphor trees were found to have root rot, which resulted in the death of camphor trees across a large area. This phenomenon has placed great pressure on the local environment and caused economic losses.
Oomycetes are a unique group of fungus-like eukaryotic microbes, many of whose genera are potential threats to the healthy growth of plants and animals [10]. As a group, they are best known as plant pathogens. Two of the more notorious genera of oomycetes are Pythium and Phytophthora, which cause economic losses to crops and plants and continue to have a devastating impact on natural ecosystems [11]. It is important to note that Phytophthora cinnamomum is an important root pathogen with a wide host range of more than 900 species of host plants worldwide [12]. Pythium also contains destructive species which cause root rot, seedling wilt, and stem rot in agronomic and vegetable crops [13]. Economic losses caused by oomycetes are estimated to exceed billions of dollars worldwide. In cases in which an oomycete becomes established in nursery soil, it can influence the roots of the plant and spread through various routes [14].
In the past, the use of protective fungicides has not been sufficient to control the development of soilborne oomycetes [15]. At the end of the last century, metalaxyl, dexon and etridizole began to be applied to control Pythium in the field; these fungicides can sterilize seeds and also be sprayed directly in the soil to play a preventive role [16]. Currently, there are several different chemical groups that control oomycetes, such as phenylamides (PAs), dithiocarbamates (e.g., mancozeb), and chlorothalonil [17]. Oxathiapiprolin and fluopicolide have recently been considered to be resistant to some genera of oomycetes, such as Pythium and Phytophthora; they have been shown to have a significant inhibitory effect on the release and activity of zoospores, mycelial growth and the sporulation ability of oomycetes [18,19].
Phytopythium is a recently established genus between Phytophthora and Pythium in terms of age, with similar characteristics. The sporangia of Phytopythium are more similar to those of Phytophthora, and the mode of discharge of zoospores, zoospores being created in the vesicle, is similar to that of Pythium [20,21,22]. The classification of taxa in the genus Pythium was revised on the basis of morphological differences in sporangia and the phylogenetic analysis of the LSU rDNA and coxI mDNA regions, from which four new genera were established: Ovatisporangium, Globisporangium, Elongisporangium, and Pilasporangium [23]. Ovatisporangium is treated with the same name as Phytopythium [24]. Phytopythium vexans has caused crown and root rot in Prunus serrulata Lindl. in Tennessee [25] and widespread leaf blight and root rot of Manihot esculenta in Brazil [26].
This study presents the features of oomycetes associated with root rot of camphor trees in Anhui Province, China, which caused serious damage and placed pressure on the local ecological environment. The objectives of this study were as follows. First, we aimed to identify oomycete pathogens that cause root rot in camphor trees by Koch’s postulates. Second, molecular biology and morphological identification were used to identify the pathogen. Third, fungicides with obvious inhibitory effects on the mycelial growth of the pathogen were screened by a media plate phenotyping experiment.

2. Results

2.1. Field Survey, Oomycete Isolation and Purification

Early in the second half of 2021, sixty camphor trees began to die, with symptoms first appearing in September and developing more rapidly in autumn. By the end of 2021, the incidence of disease in the field was about 88.3% (265 symptomatic trees), and about 27% of the 300 camphor trees surveyed died (81 dead trees). The pathogen can infest seedlings at different times of the year and cause tree death within a relatively short period of time, placing considerable strain on the ecological environment. Under normal growth, camphor is an evergreen tree year-round; however, after infection with the pathogen, the leaves gradually fade to green and yellow (Figure 1A). At a later stage, the leaves crumpled and easily fell off until the whole tree died (Figure 1B,C). The branches and stems become black and necrotic, and eventually, the whole tree dies. The xylem appears brown in longitudinal sections, and the root epidermis rots and falls off (Figure 1D,E).
In this study, one oomycete was consistently isolated from all tissue masses in the 30 root samples investigated.

2.2. Molecular Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis

All sequences obtained in this study were compared with Phytopythium isolates available in GenBank, and the homology of all isolates was verified by BLAST calculation of nucleotide identity. All sequences of 30 isolates were deposited in GenBank, and the accession numbers for the sequences of the 31 reference Phytopythium sp. isolates in the GenBank database are presented in Table 3. To produce the phylogenetic tree, we used a total of 294 sequences from 62 isolates. Phylogenetic analysis was based on sequences from 5 genomic regions: ITS, LSU rDNA, β-tubulin, coxI and coxII. For these loci, fragments of 951 bp, 683 bp, 715 bp, 670 bp and 534 bp were obtained by PCR amplification and bidirectional sequencing.
Two separate tree-building methods were used to sequence and analyze individual gene sequences before building a phylogenetic tree with five sets of gene chains. By comparison, no apparent conflicting contradictions were found in the individual gene phylogenies, so the ITS, coxI, coxII, LSU rDNA and β-tubulin datasets could be combined and concatenated. Cluster analysis was performed using sequences downloaded from the NCBI database. The concatenated matrix contained 3553 bp nucleotides. The tree topology obtained by Bayesian analysis and ML analysis was basically the same, which indicated that the evolutionary relationship of the isolates was statistically supported (Figure 2). Clustering of isolates obtained from camphor samples with the reference strain P. vexans was statistically supported by phylogenetic analysis, with 99% bootstrap proportions and a 1 BPP, resulting in a separate clade within the Phytopythium fraction (Figure 2). The isolates obtained from camphor samples were closely related to P. vexans and clustered with P. vexans isolate 2D111, with statistical support of 100% BP and 1 BPP. Phylogenetic analysis showed that all the isolates obtained in this study were highly similar to the previously reported isolates of P. vexans. Therefore, the pathogen was confirmed to be P. vexans.

2.3. Morphological Identification and Biological Characteristics

The colonies of four representative isolates grew rapidly and the colonies covered the surface of 90 mm V8-agar medium in 3 days at 25 °C. Morphological features were recorded based on visual observation. The isolates showed white colonies on CMA medium with no obvious radiolucent pattern (Figure 3A,F), and grew better on PDA medium, with colonies showing a fluffier and richer mycelium with a radial morphology (Figure 3B,G). Those cultured on V8–agar medium had a velvety blooming colony morphology with no visible sporangium formation on the surface (Figure 3C,H). However, the abundance of aerial hyphae varied among the types of medium. The hyphae on the PDA medium presented a petal-like and radial shape, and the isolates had the densest and most abundant mycelia on the V8–agar and PDA media. After 3 days of culture, the colonies on the PDA medium radiated in the form of rose petals, and the hyphae gradually became dense and velvet-like from the center to the edge; the hyphae were irregularly dispersed on the PCA medium (Figure 3D,I). The growth of the colonies on GPYA medium was weak, but the hyphae were also abundant (Figure 3E,J).
The isolates have distinct papillae (or protrusions) and proliferating free sporangia inside. After 3 days of water incubation, these traits were observed under a microscope. The shape of the sporangia was round to ovoid, with a smooth surface, and a rich matrix could be seen inside the sporangia (Figure 4B,C). It was also possible to observe empty sporangia (Figure 4A). Some of the oospores were surrounded by oogonia or showed short protuberances (Figure 4D–F). The average size of the sporangia was 13.19 × 12.41 μm, and the size of the sporangia ranged from 12.62–16.36 × 8.57–16.45 μm (n = 100). Based on colony morphology, color and sporangia, the isolates were identified as P. vexans.
The isolates grew in the range of 15–30 °C, and 25–30 °C was the optimal temperature for growth (Figure 5). The colony hyphae were most dense and fluffy when the temperature range was 25–30 °C, and the colony did not grow when the temperature reached 35 °C (Figure 6).

2.4. Pathogenicity Tests

Phytopythium vexans (representive isolates ZS01, ZS02, ZS03 and ZS04) caused symptoms of camphor wilt at 14 days after inoculation. Nevertheless, no symptoms occurred in the control group. Fourteen days after inoculation, the plants in the control group grew vigorously, with emerald-green leaves spreading outward (Figure 7A). The inoculated plant leaves began to droop with symptoms of wilting (Figure 7B). Then, 21 days after inoculation, the symptoms gradually worsened, the degree of blight increased each day, and death occurred on day 38 (Figure 7C–E). Compared with that of the control seedlings, the growth vigor of the inoculated camphor seedlings became weaker, while the uninoculated camphor seedlings grew healthy, and the root vigor of the inoculated seedlings was weakened and degraded. No symptoms were found on uninoculated plants (Figure 7F), and the root tissue was robust (Figure 7F). The longitudinal section of the stem of the camphor inoculated with isolates was dark and dull in color (Figure 7H), and the xylem stripes in the longitudinal section of the stem were clear and healthy (Figure 7G). The leaves of camphor seedlings inoculated with isolates turned yellow and withered, and the roots decayed and were fibrous and easily detached. The longitudinal section of the roots was rough and accompanied by darkening symptoms (Figure 7J), and the surface of the longitudinal section of the root of the control group was clear and bright (Figure 7I). The reisolations were recovered from symptomatic root tissue, and the cultures were similar in character and morphology to the isolates. DNA sequences extracted from reisolation obtained from inoculated roots matched the DNA sequences of the isolates used for inoculation, and the symptoms on artificially inoculated seedlings were similar to those in the field, thus satisfying Koch’s postulates.

2.5. Susceptibility of Phytopythium Isolates to Fungicides

The four representative strains showed similar biological responses to the five fungicides (Figure 8). All five fungicides showed significant growth inhibition on the representative isolates on V8-agar media; metalaxyl hymexazol had lower EC50 on mycelial growth than the other four fungicides, and difenoconazole had the highest EC50 on mycelial growth of the representative isolates, and the weakest inhibition effect (Table 1). These results indicated that metalaxyl hymexazol was the most effective fungicide against Phytopythium sp. in this study.

3. Discussion

The pathogen that causes root rot can not only infect camphor, but can also infect other potential host plants in the nursery. It is very necessary to identify the pathogen that causes root rot of camphor in a timely manner. Based on morphological identification and molecular and phylogenetic analysis, Phytopythium vexans was identified as the causal agent of root rot on camphor in China. According to previous studies, there have been no reports about P. vexans causing root rot on camphor in the world.
Pythium is usually classified based on morphological characteristics, such as the shape and size of sporangia and oogonia, and the number and position of antheridia [27,28]. However, these characteristics are very similar among the members of Pythium, and it is difficult to classify and identify Pythium by morphological characteristics alone. Based on previous studies, to date, phylogenetic analysis of Pythium is mainly based on the rDNA large subunit (LSU rDNA), ITS, β-tubulin, and cytochrome oxidase II (coxII) gene sequences [29,30,31,32,33,34]. In this study, phylogenetic analysis of a combination of ITS, LSU rDNA, coxI, coxII, and β-tubulin sequence data indicated that isolates from all collected samples were single species. The phylogenetic tree showed that the P. vexans obtained from the roots of camphor in this study were similar to those reported in other studies (Figure 2).
Phytopythium vexans (formerly known as Pythium vexans) is distributed worldwide and can cause root rot, stem rot, crown rot and leaf ulcers in many woody ornamentals [35]. According to previous academic research in South Africa, the pathogen mainly causes diseases in woody plants and economic crops, such as apples [36] and kiwifruit [37]. The incidence of brown root rot of ramie caused by P. vexans has caused over 40% of production losses in China [38]. In addition to seriously affecting cash crops such as fruit, it can also harm woody ornamentals such as ginkgo and red maples [35]; it has also been isolated from infected Anthurium andraeanum in Korea [39]. To summarize, the ecological loss caused by P. vexans worldwide is huge, so the ecological threat of P. vexans to the environment cannot be underestimated.
Temperature is environmental factor that is generally considered to be the main factor affecting the prevalence of plant diseases [40]. In this study, the optimum growth temperature of the representative isolates ranged from 25 °C to 30 °C; this is consistent with the results of previous studies on the optimum growth temperature for P. vexans [41,42]. Therefore, timely intervention of pathogens should be conducted before the appropriate growth temperature is reached. There were abundant water sources around the nursery site, and the environment was relatively humid, which may explain the prevalence of pathogens in the nursery site. Such pathogens will proliferate in a high-humidity environments, produce sporangia, release highly infectious zoospores when the conditions are suitable, and begin to infect suitable host plants. This finding indicates that future field management measures should include appropriate irrigation methods according to the growth characteristics and needs of crops. At the same time, the health of water sources is also one of the important factors preventing infection by this pathogen. It is well known that water is the main substrate for P. vexans, and a drop of water can spread zoospores within a radius of one meter because the pathogen is prone to encounter suitable environmental conditions in water, thereby releasing infectious zoospores [43]. From the perspective of controlling the development of disease, determining the biological characteristics of pathogens is very important for the prevention and control of plant disease epidemics, which can provide a scientific basis for disease prevention and control. The temperature experiment in this study proved that the time of application of fungicide should be determined before the optimal growth temperature of the pathogen is reached.
Phytopythium vexans is a soil-borne pathogen that has a wide range of transmission pathways in nurseries and spreads rapidly. The presence of the pathogen should be detected as soon as possible to help prevent the occurrence of the disease [44]. Soil-borne diseases can affect the health and appearance of a plant and even its economic value, so timely intervention is essential. There are various management measures for soil-borne diseases, such as improving the environmental conditions of nursery land, introducing relevant laws and regulations, breeding highly resistant varieties, and implementing biological and chemical control [45]. When the pathogen begins to infect plants in the soil of the field, it is very necessary to inhibit the growth of mycelial and sporangium production in a timely manner. In 2020, soybeans grown in Huang-Huai area of China have been infected by Pythium and Phytopythium. In the control of the dominant strains of the isolates, the researchers selected the fungicides containing metalaxyl, and the EC50 values obtained were all less than 1 μg/mL. Based on the experiments of this study, metalaxyl hymexazol had the best growth inhibition effect on P. vexans, and the EC50 value was less than 0.01 μg/mL. In 2022, soybean growing areas in the United States were also affected by some species of Phytophthora, Pythium, and Phytopythium, and researchers used a fungicide mixed with oxathiapiprolin and metalaxyl to control oomycetes more effectively than oxathiapiprolin alone. [46,47]. This indicates that in future field control, appropriate use of fungicides containing metalaxyl can effectively prevent the spread of oomycete pathogens. The next step is to quickly determine the concentration of effective fungicides to maximize the protection of plants from these pathogens, and then test it on the host plant to obtain the optimal application concentration.
As an important roadside and ornamental tree, camphor is widely planted in China. The isolation and identification of the pathogenic species described herein provide new ideas and references for the cultivation and management of camphor trees in China. Regarding camphor root rot, there are many issues that need to be further studied and solved. P. vexans may pose a great threat to the environment in the future, as the pathogen can infect a wider range of hosts. Testing of the soil in and around the sites wherein camphor root rot occurs and rational use of fungicides and fertilizers are both recommended in order to actively maintain appropriate environmental conditions and prevent the occurrence of the disease.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Field Survey, Oomycete Isolation and Purification

In 2021, planted camphor plots in the city of Xuancheng (118°75′, 30°94′), Anhui Province, China, were surveyed for the occurrence of root rot. The 9–10 year old camphor trees in the planting area (300 trees) were investigated, and the external symptoms of tree diseases were recorded. Disease incidence was calculated by counting the number of symptomatic trees, asymptomatic trees, and dead trees. The local area is more loosely managed, with a high level of human activity and low-lying terrain that is prone to waterlogging, which is not conducive to the growth of camphor trees. Thirty symptomatic tissues obtained from the roots of diseased plants were washed first in tap water and then in sterile distilled water and cut into small pieces of 0.5–1 cm2. These small pieces were soaked in 75% ethanol for 45 s for surface disinfection and then drained with sterile filter paper. Pieces were transferred to V8 (vegetable juice)-PARP-agar medium [48] in 90 mm-diameter Petri dishes and incubated at 28 °C in the dark for 4 days. The PARP contained pimaricin (20 mg/L), ampicillin (125 mg/L), rifampin (10 mg/L), and pentachloronitrobenzene (20 mg/L) [49]. Pure cultures were obtained by transferring the mycelial of the margins of the colonies to V8-agar medium [48].

4.2. Molecular Identification and Phylogenetic Tree of Phytopythium sp.

The genomic DNA of isolates’ strains was obtained from mycelial colonies using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide method (CTAB) [50]. In short, a small amount of mycelium was cut into a 2 mL sterile centrifuge tube, the bottom of the tube was filled with 500 mL 2% CTAB and 500 mL chloroform, and the tube was placed in a shaker at 200 r/min at 25 °C for 1.5 h and centrifuged at 13,000 r/min for 15 min after removal. After centrifugation, 300 μL of the supernatant was transferred to another 1.5 mL sterile centrifuge tube containing 600 μL absolute ethanol, and then centrifuged at 13,000 r/min for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded, and 1 mL 75% ethanol was added for elution twice, followed by centrifugation at 13,000 r/min for 5 min. Then, the solution was placed in an oven (at 65 °C) to wait for the ethanol to evaporate, and 30 μL sterile deionized water was added for precipitation to obtain a crude DNA suspension.
The primer pairs used for sequence amplification of the rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS), large subunit (LSU rDNA), β-tubulin and cytochrome c oxidase I and II (coxI and coxII) genes are listed in Table 2. Each 50 μL reaction mixture contained 25 μL of Green PCR Master Mix, 17 μL of sterile deionized water, 4 μL of DNA, and 2 μL each of the upstream and downstream primers. The PCR products were electrophoresed (150 V for 25 min) on 2% agarose gels and sequenced at the Shanghai Sangon Biological Technology Company. All sequences obtained in this study were uploaded in GenBank (Table 3).
The sequences derived from the isolates in this study and the sequences related to the Phytopythium sp. in Genbank were used to construct the phylogenetic tree; Phytophthora nicotianae was used as the outgroup. (Table 3). BioEdit version 7.0.9.0 software was used to align the nucleotide sequences, and the missing bases in these sequences were manually corrected [51]. Phylogenetic trees of combined genes were constructed using two independent optimality search criteria: Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) criteria. The ML analysis was performed using IQ-TREE [52], and the GTR+G+I model was chosen to estimate branch stability by 1000 bootstrap replicates. The BI analysis was performed using PhyloSuite version 1.2.2. [53] under a partition model, and FigTREE version 1.4.4 was used to view the phylogenetic trees.

4.3. Morphological Observations and Biological Characteristics

Four isolates (ZS01, ZS02, ZS03 and ZS04 based on preliminary phylogenetic analyses) were selected for morphological observation and biological characterization.
Isolates were cultured on potato dextrose agar medium (PDA), corn meal agar medium (CMA), potato carrot agar (PCA) medium, V8–agar medium and peptone yeast glucose agar medium (GPYA) in the dark at 25 °C for 3 days, and the morphology and color of the colonies were recorded. The identification of oomycete pathogens was initially based on the observation of morphological characteristics, as well as the characteristics of sporangia. To induce the production of sporangia, five plugs (2 mm × 2 mm) of isolates were transferred to 10% V8 liquid medium and cultivated for 3 days until the mycelial plugs became mycelial mats. Then, the V8 liquid was replaced with sterile water. To stimulate sporangial production, five drops of soil extract solution were added to each medium [48]. This operation was repeated for approximately 3 days, and the hyphae produced many sporangia. The oomycete structures of four isolates (ZS01, ZS02, ZS03 and ZS04) were examined and recorded. To observe more subtle features, the sterile water carrying the sporangia hyphae was fixed on a glass slide, and a Zeiss Axio imager A2m microscope was used to observe and measure the size of the sporangia at a magnification of 40×. Over 50 sporangia were randomly observed per isolate, and the experiment was repeated twice.
To determine the optimal growth temperature of the isolates, mycelial plugs (6 mm diameter) were placed on fresh V8–agar medium (90 mm diameter) and incubated from 15 to 35 °C at 5 °C intervals. Experiments were carried out at five temperatures, with five replicates per isolate. The colony growth diameter was measured and recorded daily. These experiments were conducted twice.

4.4. Pathogenicity Test

Four isolates selected for morphological and biological identification were used in pathogenicity tests. Pathogenicity testing of isolates was carried out on healthy 2-year-old camphor trees. The isolates were incubated on V8–agar medium for 3 days, and some of the mycelial plugs were transferred to 10% V8 liquid for 3–5 days until abundant mycelial mats were produced. To stimulate sporangia production, the V8 liquid was decanted, and then appropriate amounts of sterile water and soil extract solution were added. The operation was repeated three times at 24 h intervals until sporangia were observed under the microscope. The sporangia suspension was inoculated onto the roots of the camphor, and plants treated with sterile V8 liquid disks were used as controls. The inoculated plants were placed in high humidity and a constant temperature of 28 °C for observation. There were five replicates per treatment and control group. The experiments were conducted three times simultaneously.
To fulfil Koch’s postulates, symptomatic tissue sections were excised from the root margins and transferred to a V8-PARP–agar medium for reisolation, and the isolation was confirmed by morphological identification and molecular identification. The primers used for molecular identification were ITS, LSU rDNA, β-tubulin, coxI and coxII (Table 2).

4.5. Susceptibility of Phytopythium Isolates to Fungicides

Metalaxyl mancozeb [68% active ingredient (a.i); Syngenta Investment Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China], metalaxyl hymexazol (30% a.i; Zhongnonglihua Agricultural Chemicals Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China), fluopicolide (68.75% a.i; Bayer Cropscience Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), difenoconazole (10% a.i; Syngenta Crop Protection Co., Ltd., Nantong, China), and oxalite mancozeb (64% a.i; Syngenta Crop Protection Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China) were used in this study. Based on the previous experiment, four representative isolates were selected. The susceptibility of each isolate to fungicides was determined on fresh V8-agar media with fungicide added. Several 5mm-diameter mycelium plugs were removed from the edge of the actively growing culture colony and placed on V8-agar media with or without fungicide (as a control). For metalaxyl mancozeb and fluopicolide, final concentrations of 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 μg/mL were added to the amended media; for metalaxyl hymexazol, final concentrations of 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 10, 20, and 50 μg/mL were added to the amended media; for difenoconazole, final concentrations of 1, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, and 200 μg/mL were added to the amended media; and for oxalite mancozeb, final concentrations of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 μg/mL were added to the amended media. Five replications were carried out for each treatment, and the whole experiment was repeated three times, with mean colony diameters measured 3 days after inoculation. The formula to calculate the inhibition rate is [1 − (colony diameter at fungicide concentration/colony diameter of the control)] × 100%. EC50 values (the concentration inhibiting growth for 50%) were estimated by regression to the log10 probability conversion of percentage inhibition to fungicide concentration.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.C.; methodology, Y.X. and M.L.; software, Y.X.; validation, Y.X.; formal analysis, Y.X.; investigation, F.C.; resources, F.C.; data curation, Y.X.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.X.; writing—review and editing, M.L.; visualization, Y.X. and M.L.; supervision, F.C.; project administration, F.C.; funding acquisition, F.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFD0600104).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable for studies not involving humans or animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank those who provided assistance and advice for this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, J.; Tang, C.; Zhang, R.; Ye, S.; Zhao, Z.; Huang, Y.; Xu, X.; Lan, W.; Yang, D. Metabolomics analysis to evaluate the antibacterial activity of the essential oil from the leaves of Cinnamomum camphora (Linn.) Presl. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 253, 112652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hamidpour, R.; Hamidpour, S.; Hamidpour, M.; Shahlari, M. Camphor (Cinnamomum camphora), a traditional remedy with the history of treating several diseases. Int. J. Case Rep. Images 2013, 4, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Babu, K.N.; Sajina, A.; Minoo, D.; John, C.; Mini, P.; Tushar, K.; Rema, J.; Ravindran, P. Micropropagation of camphor tree (Cinnamomum camphora). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2003, 74, 179–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zuccarini, P. Camphor: Risks and benefits of a widely used natural product. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag. 2009, 13, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Sherkheli, M.A.; Benecke, H.; Doerner, J.F.; Kletke, O.; Vogt-Eisele, A.; Gisselmann, G.; Hatt, H. Monoterpenoids induce agonist-specific desensitization of transient receptor potential vanilloid-3 (TRPV3) ion channels. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2009, 12, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Chelliah, D.A. Biological activity prediction of an ethno medicinal plant Cinnamomum camphora through bio-informatics. Ethnobot. Leafl. 2008, 2008, 22. [Google Scholar]
  7. Frizzo, C.D.; Santos, A.C.; Paroul, N.; Serafini, L.A.; Dellacassa, E.; Lorenzo, D.; Moyna, P. Essential oils of camphor tree (Cinnamomum camphora Nees & Eberm) cultivated in Southern Brazil. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2000, 43, 313–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Huang, L.-C.; Huang, B.-L.; Murashige, T. A micropropagation protocol for Cinnamomum camphora. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 1998, 34, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, H.P.; Yang, K.; You, C.X.; Lei, N.; Sun, R.Q.; Geng, Z.F.; Ma, P.; Cai, Q.; Du, S.S.; Deng, Z.W. Chemical constituents and insecticidal activities of the essential oil of Cinnamomum camphora leaves against Lasioderma serricorne. J. Chem. 2014, 2014, 963729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Judelson, H.S.; Blanco, F.A. The spores of Phytophthora: Weapons of the plant destroyer. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Beakes, G.W.; Glockling, S.L.; Sekimoto, S. The evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete “fungi”. Protoplasma 2012, 249, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Aubrey, Z.G. Phytophthora Cinnamomi and the Diseases it Causes; The American Phytopathological Society (PAS): St. Paul, MN, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kucharek, T.; Mitchell, D. Diseases of Agronomic and Vegetable Crops Caused by Pythium; Plant Pathology Fact Sheet; University of Florida: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2000; p. 53. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang, Y.; Tyler, B.M.; Wang, Y. Defense and counterdefense during plant-pathogenic oomycete infection. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 73, 667–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cohen, Y.; Coffey, M.D. Systemic fungicides and the control of oomycetes. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1986, 24, 311–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ho, H.-H. The genus Pythium in Taiwan, China (1)—A synoptic review. Front. Biol. China 2009, 4, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gisi, U.; Sierotzki, H. Oomycete fungicides: Phenylamides. In Fungicide Resistance in Plant Pathogens; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 145–174. [Google Scholar]
  18. Toquin, V.; Latorse, M.P.; Beffa, R. Fluopicolide: A New Anti-oomycete Fungicide. Mod. Crop Prot. Compd. 2019, 2, 871–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pasteris, R.J.; Hanagan, M.A.; Bisaha, J.J.; Finkelstein, B.L.; Hoffman, L.E.; Gregory, V.; Shepherd, C.P.; Andreassi, J.L.; Sweigard, J.A.; Klyashchitsky, B.A. The discovery of oxathiapiprolin: A new, highly-active oomycete fungicide with a novel site of action. In Discovery and Synthesis of Crop Protection Products; ACS Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2015; pp. 149–161. [Google Scholar]
  20. Villa, N.O.; Kageyama, K.; Asano, T.; Suga, H. Phylogenetic relationships of Pythium and Phytophthora species based on ITS rDNA, cytochrome oxidase II and β-tubulin gene sequences. Mycologia 2006, 98, 410–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bala, K.; Robideau, G.; Désaulniers, N.; De Cock, A.; Lévesque, C. Taxonomy, DNA barcoding and phylogeny of three new species of Pythium from Canada. Pers.-Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi 2010, 25, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Levesque, C.A.; De Cock, A.W. Molecular phylogeny and taxonomy of the genus Pythium. Mycol. Res. 2004, 108, 1363–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Uzuhashi, S.; Kakishima, M.; Tojo, M. Phylogeny of the genus Pythium and description of new genera. Mycoscience 2010, 51, 337–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bala, K.; Robideau, G.; Lévesque, C.; Cock, A.; Abad, Z.; Lodhi, A.; Shahzad, S.; Ghaffar, A.; Coffey, M. Fungal planet 49. Phytopythium sindhum, gen. et sp. nov. Persoon 2010, 24, 136–137. [Google Scholar]
  25. Baysal-Gurel, F.; Liyanapathiranage, P.; Panth, M.; Avin, F.A.; Simmons, T. First report of Phytopythium vexans causing root and crown rot on flowering cherry in Tennessee. Plant Dis. 2021, 105, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Boari, A.d.J.; Cunha, E.; Quadros, A.; Barreto, R.; Fernandes, A. First report of Phytopythium sp. causing storage root rot and foliage blight of cassava in Brazil. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Waterhouse, G.M. Key to the species of Phytophthora de Bary. Commonw. Mycol. Inst. Kew UK Mycol Pap. 1963, 92, 22. [Google Scholar]
  28. Van der Plaats-Niterink, A.J. Monograph of the genus Pythium. Stud. Mycol. 1981, 254–258. [Google Scholar]
  29. Briard, M.; Dutertre, M.; Rouxel, F.; Brygoo, Y. Ribosomal RNA sequence divergence within the Pythiaceae. Mycol. Res. 1995, 99, 1119–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Matsumoto, C.; Kageyama, K.; Suga, H.; Hyakumachi, M. Phylogenetic relationships of Pythium species based on ITS and 5.8 S sequences of the ribosomal DNA. Mycoscience 1999, 40, 321–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. PanabiÈRes, F.; Ponchet, M.; Allasia, V.; Cardin, L.; Ricci, P. Characterization of border species among Pythiaceae: Several Pythium isolates produce elicitins, typical proteins from Phytophthora spp. Mycol. Res. 1997, 101, 1459–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Martin, F.N. Phylogenetic relationships among some Pythium species inferred from sequence analysis of the mitochondrially encoded cytochrome oxidase II gene. Mycologia 2000, 92, 711–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Petersen, A.B.; Rosendahl, S. Phylogeny of the Peronosporomycetes (Oomycota) based on partial sequences of the large ribosomal subunit (LSU rDNA). Mycol. Res. 2000, 104, 1295–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Voglmayr, H. Phylogenetic relationships of Peronospora and related genera based on nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences. Mycol. Res. 2003, 107, 1132–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Panth, M.; Baysal-Gurel, F.; Avin, F.A.; Simmons, T. Identification and chemical and biological management of Phytopythium vexans, the causal agent of Phytopythium root and crown rot of woody ornamentals. Plant Dis. 2021, 105, 1091–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tewoldemedhin, Y.T.; Mazzola, M.; Botha, W.J.; Spies, C.F.; McLeod, A. Characterization of fungi (Fusarium and Rhizoctonia) and oomycetes (Phytophthora and Pythium) associated with apple orchards in South Africa. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2011, 130, 215–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Polat, Z.; Awan, Q.; Hussain, M.; Akgül, D.S. First report of Phytopythium vexans causing root and collar rot of kiwifruit in Turkey. Plant Dis. 2017, 101, 1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yu, Y.-T.; Chen, J.; Gao, C.-S.; Zeng, L.-B.; Li, Z.-M.; Zhu, T.-T.; Sun, K.; Cheng, Y.; Sun, X.-P.; Yan, L. First report of brown root rot caused by Pythium vexans on ramie in Hunan, China. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2016, 38, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Park, M.-J.; Back, C.-G.; Park, J.-H. Occurrence of Phytopythium vexans Causing Stem Rot on Anthurium andraeanum in Korea. Korean J. Mycol. 2019, 47, 443–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bonde, M.; Nester, S.; Berner, D. Effects of daily temperature highs on development of Phakopsora pachyrhizi on soybean. Phytopathology 2012, 102, 761–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Cantrell, H.; Dowler, W. Effects of temperature and pH on growth and composition of Pythium irregulare and Pythium vexans. Mycologia 1971, 63, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zeng, H.; Ho, H.; Zheng, F. Pythium vexans causing patch canker of rubber trees on Hainan Island, China. Mycopathologia 2005, 159, 601–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Delmas, C.E.; Mazet, I.D.; Jolivet, J.; Delière, L.; Delmotte, F. Simultaneous quantification of sporangia and zoospores in a biotrophic oomycete with an automatic particle analyzer: Disentangling dispersal and infection potentials. J. Microbiol. Methods 2014, 107, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Beluzán, F.; Miarnau, X.; Torguet, L.; Armengol, J.; Abad-Campos, P. Survey of Oomycetes Associated with Root and Crown Rot of Almond in Spain and Pathogenicity of Phytophthora niederhauserii and Phytopythium vexans to ‘Garnem’ Rootstock. Agriculture 2022, 12, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Panth, M.; Hassler, S.C.; Baysal-Gurel, F. Methods for management of soilborne diseases in crop production. Agriculture 2020, 10, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Feng, H.; Chen, J.; Yu, Z.; Li, K.; Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Sun, Z.; Wang, Y.; Ye, W.; Zheng, X. Pathogenicity and fungicide sensitivity of Pythium and Phytopythium spp. associated with soybean in the Huang-Huai region of China. Plant Pathol. 2020, 69, 1083–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vargas, A.; Paul, P.A.; Winger, J.; Balk, C.S.; Eyre, M.; Clevinger, B.; Noggle, S.; Dorrance, A.E. Oxathiapiprolin alone or mixed with metalaxyl seed treatment for management of soybean seedling diseases caused by species of Phytophthora, Phytopythium, and Pythium. Plant Dis. 2022, 106, 2127–2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Erwin, D.C.; Ribeiro, O.K. Phytophthora Diseases Worldwide; American Phytopathological Society (APS Press): St. Paul, MN, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  49. Tsao, P.H. Factors affecting isolation and quantitation of Phytophthora from soil. Phytophthora Biol. Taxon. Ecol. Pathol. 1983, 219–236. [Google Scholar]
  50. Möller, E.; Bahnweg, G.; Sandermann, H.; Geiger, H. A simple and efficient protocol for isolation of high molecular weight DNA from filamentous fungi, fruit bodies, and infected plant tissues. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20, 6115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Nguyen, L.-T.; Schmidt, H.A.; Von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; Van Der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Symptoms of dieback and root rot disease on camphor (Cinnamomum camphora (Linn) Presl). (AC). Diseased tree and dead plants in the nursery land of Xuancheng city, Anhui, in 2021. (D). Xylem browning in diseased trees. (E). Root rot of diseased trees.
Figure 1. Symptoms of dieback and root rot disease on camphor (Cinnamomum camphora (Linn) Presl). (AC). Diseased tree and dead plants in the nursery land of Xuancheng city, Anhui, in 2021. (D). Xylem browning in diseased trees. (E). Root rot of diseased trees.
Plants 12 01072 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree obtained from Bayesian analysis of the combined coxI, coxII, ITS, LSU rDNA and β-tubulin sequence alignment of all accepted species of Phytopythium. The bootstrap support values and Bayesian posterior probabilities are given at the nodes (MLBS/BPP). The red font indicates the isolates obtained in this study. ZS01-ZS30 were the isolates in this experiment. Bootstrap values below 70% and posterior probabilities below 0.70 are not shown.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree obtained from Bayesian analysis of the combined coxI, coxII, ITS, LSU rDNA and β-tubulin sequence alignment of all accepted species of Phytopythium. The bootstrap support values and Bayesian posterior probabilities are given at the nodes (MLBS/BPP). The red font indicates the isolates obtained in this study. ZS01-ZS30 were the isolates in this experiment. Bootstrap values below 70% and posterior probabilities below 0.70 are not shown.
Plants 12 01072 g002
Figure 3. Colony formation of strain ZS01 isolated from camphor cultured after 3 days on different media at 25 °C. (A) Top and (F) reverse views of colony morphology on CMA medium. (B) Top and (G) reverse views of colony morphology on PDA medium. (C) Top and (H) reverse views of colony morphology on V8–agar medium. (D) Top and (I) reverse views of colony morphology on PCA medium. (E) Top and (J) reverse views of colony morphology on GPYA medium.
Figure 3. Colony formation of strain ZS01 isolated from camphor cultured after 3 days on different media at 25 °C. (A) Top and (F) reverse views of colony morphology on CMA medium. (B) Top and (G) reverse views of colony morphology on PDA medium. (C) Top and (H) reverse views of colony morphology on V8–agar medium. (D) Top and (I) reverse views of colony morphology on PCA medium. (E) Top and (J) reverse views of colony morphology on GPYA medium.
Plants 12 01072 g003
Figure 4. (A) Empty sporangia. (B,C) Sporangia. (D,F) Sexual structures showing an oogonia and oospore. (E) Sporangia showing short protuberances. Bars = 10 μm.
Figure 4. (A) Empty sporangia. (B,C) Sporangia. (D,F) Sexual structures showing an oogonia and oospore. (E) Sporangia showing short protuberances. Bars = 10 μm.
Plants 12 01072 g004
Figure 5. Effect of temperature on colony diameter growth of isolates ZS01–04 after 3 days of culture on V8-agar media.
Figure 5. Effect of temperature on colony diameter growth of isolates ZS01–04 after 3 days of culture on V8-agar media.
Plants 12 01072 g005
Figure 6. Colony morphology of the isolate ZS01 after 3 days of culture on V8-agar medium at 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 °C.
Figure 6. Colony morphology of the isolate ZS01 after 3 days of culture on V8-agar medium at 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 °C.
Plants 12 01072 g006
Figure 7. Symptoms on 2-year-old camphor after inoculation with isolate ZS01. (A) Control treated with sterile V8 liquid. (BE) Diseased sapling, with symptoms at 14 days, 21 days, 28 days and 35 days post inoculation. (F) Control roots and roots of diseased saplings. (G,H) Control longitudinal section and longitudinal section from the stem of a diseased sapling 40 days after inoculation with ZS01. (I,J) Control longitudinal section and longitudinal section of the root of a diseased sapling 38 days after inoculation with ZS01. Dpi: days post inoculation.
Figure 7. Symptoms on 2-year-old camphor after inoculation with isolate ZS01. (A) Control treated with sterile V8 liquid. (BE) Diseased sapling, with symptoms at 14 days, 21 days, 28 days and 35 days post inoculation. (F) Control roots and roots of diseased saplings. (G,H) Control longitudinal section and longitudinal section from the stem of a diseased sapling 40 days after inoculation with ZS01. (I,J) Control longitudinal section and longitudinal section of the root of a diseased sapling 38 days after inoculation with ZS01. Dpi: days post inoculation.
Plants 12 01072 g007
Figure 8. The effect of suppression on isolate ZS01 on plates by corresponding doses of five different fungicides (metalaxyl mancozeb, fluopicolide, oxalite mancozeb, difenoconazole, and metalaxyl hymexazol) based on fresh V8-agar medium for 3 days.
Figure 8. The effect of suppression on isolate ZS01 on plates by corresponding doses of five different fungicides (metalaxyl mancozeb, fluopicolide, oxalite mancozeb, difenoconazole, and metalaxyl hymexazol) based on fresh V8-agar medium for 3 days.
Plants 12 01072 g008
Table 1. Mean half-maximal effective concentration (EC50 values) of isolates. (Data = mean ± standard error).
Table 1. Mean half-maximal effective concentration (EC50 values) of isolates. (Data = mean ± standard error).
IsolatesEC50 Values (μg/mL)
Metalaxyl MancozebMetalaxyl HymexazolFluopicolideDifenoconazoleOxalite Mancozeb
ZS011.31 ± 0.010.003 ± 0.0022.55 ± 0.1417.38 ± 3.568.32 ± 1.04
ZS021.29 ± 0.010.002 ± 0.0022.35 ± 0.0215.90 ± 2.889.40 ± 1.33
ZS031.30 ± 0.120.011 ± 0.0042.62 ± 0.0117.09 ± 3.2410.23 ± 0.98
ZS041.28 ± 0.070.019 ± 0.0012.50 ± 0.0118.68 ± 3.667.88 ± 1.11
Table 2. Primer sequences used for molecular identification of isolates.
Table 2. Primer sequences used for molecular identification of isolates.
PrimerSequence (5′-3′)PCR Conditions
ITS1
ITS4
TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG
TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC
Denaturation for 3 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles; 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 55 °C, 60 s at 72 °C, and 10 min of a final extension at 70 °C
Coxlevup
Coxlevlo
TCAWCWMGATGGCTTTTTTCAAC
CYTCHGGRTGWCCRAAAAACCAAA
Denaturation for 3 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles; 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 53 °C, 60 s at 72 °C, and 10 min of a final extension at 70 °C
CoxII-F
CoxII-Rc4
GGCAAATGGGTTTTCAAGATCC
TGATTWAYNCCACAAATTTCRCTACATTG
Denaturation for 3 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles; 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 53 °C, 60 s at 72 °C, and 10 min of a final extension at 70 °C
NL1
NL4
GCATATCAATAAGCGGAGGAAAAG
GGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGG
Denaturation for 3 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles; 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 55 °C, 60 s at 72 °C, and 10 min of a final extension at 70 °C
Btub-F1A
Btub-R1A
GCCAAGTTCTGGGARGTSAT
CCTGGTACTGCTGGTAYTCMGA
Denaturation for 5 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles; 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 60 °C, 60 s at 72 °C, and 10 min of a final extension at 70 °C
Table 3. GenBank accession numbers of isolates used for phylogenetic analysis in this study.
Table 3. GenBank accession numbers of isolates used for phylogenetic analysis in this study.
SpeciesIsolatesGenBank Accession Numbers
rDNA ITSLSU rDNAcoxIcoxIIβ-tubulin
P. aichienseCBS 137195AB948197AB948194AB948191AB948192AB948170
P. chamaehyphonCBS 25930AB690609AB690593AB690644AB690674AB948188
P. carbonicumCBS 112544AB725876AB996605AB690648AB690678AB948183
P. citrinumCBS 119171AY197328AB690597AB690649AB690679AB948180
P. cucurbitacearumCBS 7496AB725877AB690598AB690650AB690680AB948189
P. delawarense382BAB725875AB690591AB690642AB690672AB948181
P. helicoidesCBS 28631AB725878AB690594AB690645AB690675AB948187
H5AB690611AB690582AB690633AB690663AB948186
P. iriomotenseGUCC0025AB690622AB690600AB690652AB690682AB948172
GUCC0028AB690623AB690601AB690653AB690683AB948171
GUCC0036AB690624AB690602AB690654AB690684AB948173
CBS 137104AB690629AB690607AB690659AB690689AB948174
P. litoraleNBRC107451AB690612AB690583AB690634AB690664AB948182
CBS 118360HQ643386HQ665082HQ708433KJ595418NA
P. mercurialeCBS 122443AB725882AB690585AB690636AB690666AB948179
P. montanumCBS 111349AB725883AB690586AB690637AB690667AB948184
P. oedochilumCBS 25270AB690618AB690592AB690643AB690673AB948175
CBS 29237AB690619AB690595AB690646AB690676NA
GUCC5091AB920534NAAB920493AB920500NA
P. ostracodesCBS 76873AY598663AB690587AB690638AB690668AB948178
P. megacarpumCBS 112351HQ643388HQ665067HQ708435AB690665NA
P. borealeCBS 55188HQ643372HQ665261HQ708419AB690677NA
P. mirpurenseCBS 124523KJ831613KJ831613KJ831612NANA
P. vexansNBRC107442AB690626AB690604AB690656AB690686NA
NBRC107393AB690630AB690608AB690660AB690690NA
NBRC107380AB690627AB690605AB690657AB690687NA
NBRC107381AB690628AB690606AB690658AB690688NA
NBRC107397AB690610AB690581AB690632AB690662NA
CBS 11980HQ643400HQ665090HQ708447GU133518NA
P133MT740895MT729990MT720669MT720685NA
2D111AB725880AB856796AB856784AB948193AB948169
ZS01OM663739OP159402OM791301OM791302OP185088
ZS02OM663740OP159403OM791303OM791304OP185089
ZS03OM663741OP159404OM791305OM791306OP185090
ZS04OM663742OP159405OM791307OM791308OP185091
ZS05OP941721OP947167OP948802OP948803OP948801
ZS06OP941722OP947168OP948805OP948806OP948804
ZS07OP941723OP947169OP948808OP948809OP948807
ZS08OP941724OP947170OP948811OP948812OP948810
ZS09OP941725OP947171OP948814OP948815OP948813
ZS10OP941726OP947172OP948817OP948818OP948816
ZS11OP941727OP947173OP948820OP948821OP948819
ZS12OP941728OP947174OP948823OP948824OP948822
ZS13OP941729OP947175OP948826OP948827OP948825
ZS14OP941730OP947176OP948829OP948830OP948828
ZS15OP941731OP947177OP948832OP948833OP948831
ZS16OP941732OP947178OP948835OP948836OP948834
ZS17OP941733OP947179OP948838OP948839OP948837
ZS18OP941734OP947180OP948841OP948842OP948840
ZS19OP941735OP947181OP948844OP948845OP948843
ZS20OP941736OP947182OP948847OP948848OP948846
ZS21OP941737OP947183OP948850OP948851OP948849
ZS22OP941738OP947184OP948853OP948854OP948852
ZS23OP941739OP947185OP948856OP948857OP948855
ZS24OP941740OP947186OP948859OP948860OP948858
ZS25OP941741OP947187OP948862OP948863OP948861
ZS26OP941742OP947188OP948865OP948866OP948864
ZS27OP941743OP947189OP948868OP948869OP948867
ZS28OP941744OP947190OP948871OP948872OP948870
ZS29OP941745OP947191OP948874OP948875OP948873
ZS30OP941746OP947192OP948877OP948878OP948876
Phytophthora nicotianaeGF101AB688384AB688538AB688265NAAB948190
NA = Information is not available. Species and isolates obtained in this study are shown in bold.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xiao, Y.; Li, M.; Chen, F. Root Rot of Cinnamomum camphora (Linn) Presl Caused by Phytopythium vexans in China. Plants 2023, 12, 1072. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12051072

AMA Style

Xiao Y, Li M, Chen F. Root Rot of Cinnamomum camphora (Linn) Presl Caused by Phytopythium vexans in China. Plants. 2023; 12(5):1072. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12051072

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xiao, Yatong, Min Li, and Fengmao Chen. 2023. "Root Rot of Cinnamomum camphora (Linn) Presl Caused by Phytopythium vexans in China" Plants 12, no. 5: 1072. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12051072

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop