Next Article in Journal
Genotypic Differences in the Effect of P Fertilization on Phytic Acid Content in Rice Grain
Next Article in Special Issue
Extracts of Common Pesticidal Plants Increase Plant Growth and Yield in Common Bean Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Phenolic Profile, Toxicity, Enzyme Inhibition, In Silico Studies, and Antioxidant Properties of Cakile maritima Scop. (Brassicaceae) from Southern Portugal
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fumigant Toxicity in Myzus persicae Sulzer (Hemiptera: Aphididae): Controlled Release of (E)-anethole from Microspheres
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Phytochemical Composition of Melia volkensii and Its Potential for Insect Pest Management

1
Department of Plants and Crops, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
2
SynBioC, Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
3
Kenya Forestry Research Institute, P.O Box 20412-00200 Nairobi, Kenya
4
Better Globe Forestry, P.O Box 823-00606 Nairobi, Kenya
5
Department of Plant Science and Crop Protection, University of Nairobi, P.O Box 30197-0010 Nairobi, Kenya
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2020, 9(2), 143; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9020143
Submission received: 31 December 2019 / Revised: 18 January 2020 / Accepted: 20 January 2020 / Published: 22 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pesticidal Plants: From Smallholder Use to Commercialisation)

Abstract

:
Due to potential health and environmental risks of synthetic pesticides, coupled with their non-selectivity and pest resistance, there has been increasing demand for safer and biodegradable alternatives for insect pest management. Botanical pesticides have emerged as a promising alternative due to their non-persistence, high selectivity, and low mammalian toxicity. Six Meliaceae plant species, Azadirachta indica, Azadirachta excelsa, Azadirachta siamens, Melia azedarach, Melia toosendan, and Melia volkensii, have been subject to botanical pesticide evaluation. This review focuses on Melia volkensii, which has not been intensively studied. M. volkensii, a dryland tree species native to East Africa, has shown activity towards a broad range of insect orders, including dipterans, lepidopterans and coleopterans. Its extracts have been reported to have growth inhibiting and antifeedant properties against Schistocerca gregaria, Trichoplusia ni, Pseudaletia unipuncta, Epilachna varivestis, Nezara viridula, several Spodoptera species and other insect pests. Mortality in mosquitoes has also been reported. Several limonoids with a wide range of biological activities have been isolated from the plant, including volkensin, salannin, toosendanin, trichilin-class limonoids, volkendousin, kulactone among others. This paper presents a concise review of published information on the phytochemical composition and potential of M. volkensii for application in insect pest management.

1. Introduction

The continuous and indiscriminate use of synthetic pesticides in crop protection has led to an increase in pest resistance, health and environmental concerns [1]. This has led to a renewed interest in natural products as alternative sources for insect pest control [1]. One of the most promising options is the use of secondary metabolites produced by plants, many of which are toxic to a wide spectrum of insect pests [2]. Plant extracts can offer a solution to insect pest control because they are environmentally friendly, easily biodegradable, and are target-specific [3].
The Meliaceae plant family has been reported to produce a wide range of compounds, including flavonoids, chromones, coumarins, benzofurans, mono-, sesqui-, di-, and triterpenoids, but tetranortriterpenoids with a β-substituted furanyl ring at C17α are the best known for the production of limonoids [4]. Limonoids are known for a range of biological activities, including insect antifeedant and growth-regulating properties and antibacterial properties [4]. Alkaloids are rarely isolated from Meliaceae [4]. Reviews on the Meliaceae plant family have been reported in the literature. The use of Meliaceae plant extracts as potential mosquitocides have been reviewed, and Azadirachta indica A. Juss (Indian neem tree) is reported as a potential plant for the control of vector mosquitoes [5]. Reviews on the chemical constituents of the genus Melia reported the isolation of terpenoids, steroids, alkaloids, flavonoids, anthraquinones with a wide range of biological activities including antiviral, pesticidal, inhibition of iNOS, antitumor, antibacterial and antifungal activities [6,7]. A phytopharmacological review of Melia azedarach Linnaeus (chinaberry) has been reported outlining its use in folk medicine having antifertility, antiviral, cytotoxic, antibacterial, immunomodulatory, repellent, antifeedant, antilithic and anthelmintic activity from various parts of the plant [8,9]. A review on A. indica has reported its use in agriculture for application as manure, fertilizer, soil conditioner, fumigant, and as botanical pesticide [10]. Melia volkensii (Gurke) has also been identified as one of the pesticidal plants in Africa [11]. Another review has explored the phytochemical and antimicrobial activities of the Meliaceae family [12]. Detailed information on commercially available neem products developed for agricultural pest control has also been reviewed [13].
Several plant species of the Meliaceae have shown promising bioactivity against a variety of insects [3]. Their insect growth regulatory and antifeedant properties against many insect pests have made them emerge as a potent source of insect control products [14]. Six species have been subjected to botanical pesticide evaluation; these include A. indica (Indian neem tree), Azadirachta excelsa Jack (Philippine neem tree), Azadirachta siamens Valeton (Siamese neem tree), M. azedarach (chinaberry), Melia toosendan Siebold and Zucc., and M. volkensii [13]. However, research has concentrated mostly on A. indica (neem tree) and M. azedarach (chinaberry) [15]. Azadirachtin, a commercial biopesticide, and other limonoids isolated from A. indica, have been effective growth regulators and feeding deterrents for a wide range of insect species [16]. Azadirachtin targets the corpus cardiacum in insects, which in turn affects neuroendocrine activity and turnover of neurosecretion [17]. Extracts from M. azedarach have also shown antifeedant activity against the juvenile and adult Xanthogaleruca luteola Muller (elm leaf beetles) and mortality against its larvae [16]. Fruit extracts from M. azedarach are also effective against Napomyza lateralis Fallen (agromyzid leafminers) and Trialeurodes vaporariorum Westwood (whiteflies) [16]. Toosendanin, a limonoid constituent of M. azedarach which has been commercialized in China, is an effective growth inhibitor against Ostrinia nubilalis Hübner (European corn borer), effective repellent against Pieris brassicae Linnaeus (cabbage moth) and an oviposition deterrent against Trichoplusia ni Hübner (cabbage looper) [16]. Toosendanin is reported to be mainly active against lepidopteran pests and is less active than azadirachtin [18].
M. volkensii, a dryland tree species native to East Africa has, however, not been intensively studied [16]. It is a tall tree (15–25 m), shown in Figure 1, which grows in semi-arid areas of Kenya, Tanzania, Ethiopia, and Somalia at altitudes of between 350 to 1700 m above sea level [19]. The tree, like other meliaceous plants, is fast growing and produces fruits after 4–5 years [19]. It remains green for most of the year and is prized by farmers for its termite-resistant timber. It is intercropped with food crops, used for shade, firewood, and livestock fodder [19]. Several chemical compounds occur only in M. volkensii. These include: 1-O-cinnamoyltrichilin, meliavolkinin, 1,3-diacetylvilasinin, meliavolkin, volkensin, volkensinin, 12β- and 6β-hydroxykulactone, meliavolkenin, meliavolin, meliavolen, melianinone, meliavolkensin A and B, melianin C, (E)- and (Z)-volkendousin, meliavosin, 2-9-epoxymeliavosin [6]. M. volkensii seed kernel extracts have more insect growth inhibitory and acute lethal toxicity than azadirachtin-containing fractions from neem seed kernel extracts [20]. It has been reported that when M. volkensii dried fruit powder and residual fruit cake obtained after extraction with ethanol are used as goat feed, their growth and performance are not negatively affected, indicating that both fruit powder and its cake could be used as safe ruminant feed supplement [21]. Its use as a fodder crop underscores its safety in mammals [20], and traditionally, it is used for the treatment of diarrhea, pain, skin rashes, and eczema [22]. Aqueous extracts of M. volkensii have also traditionally been used to control ticks and fleas in goats [19]. M. volkensii offers a key indigenous tree species that can be used to mitigate against desertification in arid and semi-arid lands [23], while also offering a high economic potential for the rural community in these regions [24]. This paper presents a concise review of published information on the phytochemical composition and potential application of M. volkensii in insect pest management.

2. Biological Activity of Melia volkensii Extracts Against Insects

Crude fruit extracts from M. volkensii have been reported to pose activity towards a broad range of insect orders including Diptera, Lepidoptera, Coleoptera among others [19] as shown in Table A1 (Appendix A). The methanolic fruit extracts were first reported to have antifeedant effects against Schistocerca gregaria Forsk. (desert locusts) [25]. Repellency effect, decreased mobility, retarded development and reduced fecundity were observed against S. gregaria when seed extract was applied to their preferred host plants mainly Schouwia thebaica Webb, Fagonia olivieri DC (fagonbush plant) and Hyoscyamus muticus Linnaeus (Egyptian henbane) in a field trial experiment [26]. Although the mode of action of the extracts is still unknown, it is postulated that the active compounds in M. volkensii extracts could affect hormone levels in S. gregaria larvae [27]. In fifth-instar nymphs of S. gregaria, 80% mortality was recorded 48 hours after injection with crude ethanolic and methanolic extracts at a concentration of 30 μg/g of the insect [19]. When sprayed on third- to fifth-instar S. gregaria, M. volkensii and neem oil have been reported to cause mortality of up to 91% and 92%, respectively, after 14 days in a comparative study [26]. In contrast to synthetic pesticides, these botanicals do not have a knock-down effect, but their slow response is similar to inhibitors of chitin synthesis [26].
Antifeedant and larval growth inhibitory effects of fruit extracts have been observed in Trichoplusia ni Hübner (cabbage looper) and Pseudaletia unipuncta Haworth (true armyworm) [25,28]. Crude seed extracts are also an effective growth inhibitor against T. ni (dietary EC50 = 7.6 ppm) and feeding deterrent (DC50 = 0.9 μg/cm2) [29]. Prolonged exposure to M. volkensii extracts has been observed to lead to a decrease in antifeedant response when tested against T. ni implying that the insect could develop tolerance to the extracts [30]. However, when tested against Plutella xylostella Linnaeus (diamondback moth) and P. unipuncta, there was no significant decrease in feeding deterrent response to the extracts following continuous exposure [31]. It has been postulated that triterpenoids from seed kernels of M. volkensii are responsible for the insecticidal activity in T. ni [11]. Comparative efficacy has been observed with M. volkensii extracts, other Meliaceae plant extracts (A. indica, A. excelsa, M. azedarach, and Trichilia americana Sessé & Mocino) and commercial botanical insecticides (ryania, pyrethrum, rotenone and essential oils of rosemary and clove leaf) when tested against T. ni and P. unipuncta [32].
M. volkensii fruit extracts when tested at concentrations ranging from 1 to 50 μg/μL showed feeding deterrence, growth disruption and mortality against Nezara viridula Linnaeus (stink bug), a polyphagous pest which attacks a variety of crops, including nuts, corn, cotton, grains and tomatoes [16]. The disruption of the molting process led to eventual mortality in N. viridula [16]. Furthermore, deformities and malfunctions like shortened or missing antennae, legs failing to detach from the exuvium, absent or shortened hemelytra, notching, and lack of symmetry have been observed in N. viridula when exposed to fruit extracts, with 10 μg/μL causing malformation in up to 85.70% of surviving adults [16]. A delay of the imaginal molt was observed in immature Coranus arenaceus Walker even though there were no deformities in resultant adults after topical application of the M. volkensii extracts at 1, 5, and 10 μg/μL [16].
When applied to cabbage leaf disks in a choice bioassay, M. volkensii fruit extract showed potent antifeedant properties against Epilachna varivestis Mulsant (Mexican bean beetle) [16]. Growth inhibition has also been observed in P. unipuncta (dietary EC50 = 12.5 ppm) with refined seed extracts to the leaf discs in a choice bioassay [29]. The seed extracts also showed feeding deterrent effects on third-instar larvae of P. unipuncta and P. xylostella, and adults of E. varivestis (DC50 = 10.5, 20.7 and 2.3 μg/cm2, respectively) [29]. In fact, M. volkensii seed extracts have been recorded to have stronger antifeedant activity compared to pure allelochemicals: digitoxin, cymarin, xanthotoxin, toosendanin, thymol and trans-anethole against P. unipuncta, P. xylostella and E. varivestis [29]. When applied to Spodoptera litura Fabricius, neem, rotenone, M. volkensii extract, toosendanin, Annona squamosal L. extract and pyrethrum at 1% concentration recorded larval growth (% relative to control) of 4.1, 97.5, 26.2, 48.3, 61.4, and 56.6%, respectively after 96 h in a comparative study [1].
Dried M. volkensii fruit extracts have shown growth-inhibiting activity against Aedes aegypti Linnaeus (yellow fever mosquito) larvae at 2 μg/mL in water, whilst recording high mortality during the molting and melanization process with LC50 of 50 μg/mL in 48 h [13]. At a high dose (100 μg/mL), the extracts caused acute toxicity, while at a low dose, the lethal effect took a long time, indicating the presence of compounds with an acute toxic effect at a high concentration and a growth-inhibiting effect at a low concentration [20]. Growth inhibiting and disrupting effects in A. aegypti could be a result of synergistic effects of a plethora of limonoid compounds or a single active compound exerting these effects [20].
A column chromatography-purified fraction of M. volkensii fruit kernel extract showed growth-inhibiting activity against Anopheles arabiensis Giles with an LC50 of 5.4 μg/mL in 48 h [13]. Mortality (LC50 of 34.72 μg/mL in 48 h) and oviposition deterrence was observed in second-instar larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Southern house mosquito) when treated with refined methanolic fruit extracts [33]. The granular formulation of M. volkensii fruit acetone extract showed S- and U-shaped postures and frequent stretching in C. quinquefasciatus; such postures and stretching are a characteristic of mosquito larvae reared in M. volkensii fruit extract [34]. The test granules also caused 86% mortality in third- and fourth-instar larvae of C. quinquefasciatus within 36 h [34]. Acetone extracts from M. volkensii seeds have recorded growth inhibitory effects and equal toxicity (LD50 of 30 μg/mL) for larvae and pupae of C. pipiens f. molestus Forskål (London underground mosquito) [17]. M. azedarach seed extracts recorded lower toxicity (LD50 of 40 μg/mL) while pure azadirachtin A recorded higher toxicity (LD50 of 1–5 μg/mL) against C. pipiens when compared with M. volkensii extracts [17]. The water solubility of the acetone seed extract from M. volkensii may indicate the presence of saponins as toxic principles thus making it an interesting candidate for application against aquatic insects such as mosquitoes and other vectors of diseases [17].

3. Phytochemistry and Insect Bioactivity of Melia volkensii

Insect antifeedants have been found in major classes of secondary metabolites—alkaloids, phenolics, and terpenoids [35]. However, it is in the terpenoids that the greatest number and diversity of antifeedants, and the most potent, have been found. Most well-documented antifeedants are triterpenoids [35]. Effective insect antifeedants have been isolated from various parts of M. volkensii, as shown in Figure 2 and Table A2 (Appendix B), although azadirachtin, the major ingredient in neem seeds, does not occur in M. volkensii. This indicates that insect control bioactivity is, therefore, based on other compounds than azadirachtin [25]. It is postulated that the major active compound in M. volkensii fruit is more lipophilic than azadirachtin [20]. Botanical antifeedants are easily degraded after application thereby causing little environmental impact [36].
The insect antifeedants volkensin (1) and salannin (2) have been isolated from seed extracts of M. volkensii [37]. Additionally, volkensin (1) and salannin (2) were isolated from the whole fruits of M. volkensii [37]. Volkensin (1) has shown antifeedant activity against Spodoptera frugiperda Smith (fall armyworms) larvae with an ED50 of 3.5 μg/cm2 [19]. Salannin (2) has also shown antifeedant activity against insect pests such as Acalymma vittata Fabricius (striped cucumber beetle), Musca domestica Linnaeus (housefly), Epilachna varivestis Mulsant (Mexican bean beetle), Heliothis virescens Fabricius (tobacco budworm), S. frugiperda and Spodoptera littoralis Boisduval (cotton leafworm) [38]. Salannin (2) has also been reported to cause feeding suppression against larvae of Earias insulana Boisduval (Egyptian stemborer), weight reduction (59%–89%) in Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee (rice leafroller) and reduction in activities of acid phosphatases (ACP), alkaline phosphatases (ALP) and adenosine triphosphatases (ATPase), implying that gut enzyme activities were affected. 2’,3’-Dihydrosalannin (3), 1-detigloyl-1-isobutylsalannin (4) and 1α,3α-diacetylvilasinin (5) have also been isolated from the plant [7].
M. volkensii seed extracts, extracted in cold water, have been reported to contain unsaturated fatty acids (oleic acid (6), linoleic acid (7) and gadoleic acid (8)) and saturated fatty acids (palmitic acid (9), stearic acid (10) and arachidic acid (11)) as shown in Figure 3 [39]. Fatty acids with at least 18 carbon atoms have been found to synergistically enhance insecticidal activity of insecticides [40]. Oleic acid (6), linoleic acid (7), linolenic acid, and ricinoleic acid have enhanced insecticidal activity of organophosphates and carbamates when applied against sucking insects and defoliating insects [40].
Other chemical compounds that have been isolated from various parts of M. volkensii are shown in Figure 4. Toosendanin (12), which has been isolated from the root bark of M. volkensii [22], has been reported to be an effective growth inhibitor against O. nubilalis, an effective repellent against P. brassicae and an oviposition deterrent against T. ni [16]. 1-Cinnamoyltrichilinin (13) has shown antifeedant activity towards S. littoralis having minimum antifeedant concentration (MAC) value of 1000 mg/L and a significant antibacterial activity against Porphyromonas gingivalis ATCC 33277 with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of 15.6 μg/mL [7]. Nimbolin B (14) has been reported to have antifeedant activity against several Spodoptera species (S. exigua, S. eridania and S. littoralis) [7]. There was a clear-cut structure-activity relationship when trichilin-class limonoids (1-cinnamoyltrichilinin 13, 1-acetyltrichilinin 15, 1-tigloyltrichilinin 16) were tested against Spodoptera eridania Stoll (Southern armyworm) where the 12α-OH function was the most potent, followed by 12β-OH, 12-desoxy, and 12α-acetoxy groups in order of decreasing potency [7]. The 12-OH functionality could be necessary for maximum bioactivity in trichilin-class limonoids (13, 15, 16) [7]. 2,19-oxymeliavosin 17, which has weak activity with marginally significant selectivity for breast cancer cell line (MCF-7), has also been isolated from the root bark of M. volkensii [41]. Ohchinin-3-acetate (18), isolated from methanolic extract of M. volkensii fruits [42], and meliantriol (19), both insect antifeedants have also been reported [15]. Meliantriol has exhibited moderate cytotoxicity against human epidermoid carcinoma of the nasopharynx (KB), multidrug-resistant (KB-C2), and breast cancer cell line (MCF-7) [43].

4. Further Phytochemical Composition and Biological Activity of Melia volkensii

Other compounds have also been isolated from M. volkensii with different biological activities. These include volkensinin, as isolated from ethanolic extracts of M. volkensii root bark [44], which showed weak bioactivity in the brine shrimp lethality test BST (LC50 = 57 μg/mL) and weak cytotoxicity against six human tumor cell lines with ED50 values of 27.90, 28.35, 33.56, 29.55, 8.43, and 28.51 μg/mL in A-498 (human kidney carcinoma), PC-3 (prostate adenocarcinoma), PACA-2 (pancreatic carcinoma), A-549 (human lung carcinoma), MCF-7 (human breast carcinoma), and HT-29 (human colon adenocarcinoma), respectively [44]. Toosendanin has activity against Escherichia coli Migula and Aspergillus niger Tiegh. with respective minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 12.5 and 6.25 μg/mL [22]. Melianin B, isolated from the root bark of M. volkensii, showed cytotoxicity against six human solid tumor cell lines: A-549, MCF-7, HT-29, A-498, PACA-2, and PC-3 [45]. Bioactivity-guided fractionation of M. volkensii root bark led to the isolation of meliavolkenin which showed moderate cytotoxicity against three human tumor cell lines with a respective ED50 value of 10.33 μg/mL, 4.30 μg/mL, and 0.67 μg/mL in A-549, MCF-7, and HT-29 cells [46]. The bioactive apotirucallane triterpenes meliavolkensin A and meliavolkensin B, both isolated from the root bark of M. volkensii [47], have shown cytotoxicity against human colon tumor cell lines H-29 (human colon adeno-carcinoma) with ED50 values of 0.49 μg/mL and 0.25 μg/mL, respectively [47]. (E)-volkendousin, isolated from M. volkensii root bark, also showed activity against six human tumor cell lines (A-549, MCF-7, HT-29, A-498, PACA-2 and PC-3) [48]. Meliavolin, marginally cytotoxic against human tumor cell lines with an ED50 of 11.25 μg/mL, 0.57 μg/mL and 6.65 μg/mL in A-549, MCF-7 and HT-29 cells, respectively [49], has been isolated from M. volkensii root bark following activity-directed fractionation with brine shrimp test [49]. Kulactone was isolated from root bark of M. volkensii and exhibited significant activity against E. coli and A. niger with a respective minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of 12.5 and 6.25 μg/mL [22]. Bioactivity-guided antimycobacterial investigations against Mycobacterium tuberculosis Zopf resulted in the isolation of 12β-hydroxykulactone, 6β-hydroxykulactone and kulonate from M. volkensii seeds with MIC values of 16 μg/mL, 4 μg/mL, and 16 μg/mL, respectively [50]. Meliavolkin has shown anticancer activity against three human tumor cell lines: A-549 (ED50 = 0.57 μg/mL), MCF-7 (ED50 = 0.26 μg/mL), and HT-29 (ED50 = 0.12 μg/mL) [7]. Other limonoids isolated from M. volkensii include 3-episapelin, meliavolen, melianinone [4], and nimbolin B [51] and all have shown selectivity for the colon cell line HT-29 [51]. Other compounds, which have been isolated from M. volkensii include scopoletin [22], melianin C and meliavolkinin [7], methyl kulonate and 2,19-epoxymeliavosin [6], nimbolidins C-E [12]. However, their activity against insects has not been reported in literature.

5. Conclusions

Extracts and pure compounds isolated from M. volkensii have proved to be effective insect antifeedants and growth inhibitors. Extensive research has been done on mosquito control using M. volkensii; however, more research needs to be done on insect pests of agricultural importance. M. volkensii has no reported adverse effect on the environment or mammals, making it a potential botanical pesticide for the biosafe application in integrated pest management. The availability of renewable resources from the tree, such as fruits, stem bark, and leaves makes this plant a potential candidate for insect control with minimal interference on the plant. In this regard, M. volkensii could be further exploited as a source of natural insecticide.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization—G.S., S.P.O.W., J.M., T.M., F.O. and J.V.d.A.; investigation—V.J., S.B., C.N.T.T., G.S., S.M., S.P.O.W., F.O.; resources—S.P.O.W. and G.S.; writing—original draft preparation—V.J.; writing—review and editing—G.S., S.P.O.W., S.M., C.N.T.T., S.B., J.M., T.M., F.O. and J.V.d.A.; supervision—G.S., S.M., S.P.O.W., F.O., C.N.T.T.; project administration—S.P.O.W., F.O., T.M.; funding acquisition—G.S., S.P.O.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by VLIR-UOS. Grant number KE2018TEA465A103.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank VLIR-UOS for the financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

Table A1. Melia volkensii as a botanical pesticide for insect pest control.
Table A1. Melia volkensii as a botanical pesticide for insect pest control.
Target Insect *OrderBiological ActivityPlant Part UsedReference
Desert locust, Schistocerca gregariaOrthopteraAntifeedant, repellency, growth inhibition, mortalityFruit[19,25,26]
Cabbage looper, Trichoplusia niLepidopteraAntifeedant, growth inhibition, mortalityFruit, seed[25,28,29,30]
True armyworm, Pseudaletia unipunctaLepidopteraAntifeedant, growth inhibitionFruit, seed[11,25,28,29,31]
Diamondback moth, Plutella xylostellaLepidopteraAntifeedantFruits[29,31]
Stink bug, Nezara viridulaHemipteraAntifeedant, growth disruption, mortalityFruit[16]
Coranus arenaceusHemipteraGrowth inhibitionFruit[16]
Mexican bean beetle, Epilachna varivestisColeopteraAntifeedant, growth inhibitionSeed[16,29]
Yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegyptiDipteraGrowth inhibition, mortalityFruit[13,20]
Anopheles arabiensisDipteraGrowth inhibitionFruit kernel[13]
Southern house mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatusDipteraOviposition deterrence, mortalityFruit[13,33,34]
London underground mosquito, Culex pipiens molestusDipteraGrowth inhibition, mortalitySeed[17]
* Non exhaustive list of potential target insect pests.

Appendix B

Table A2. Phytochemical investigation of Melia volkensii.
Table A2. Phytochemical investigation of Melia volkensii.
Compound *Plant Part Isolated FromBiological ActivityReference
VolkensinSeed, fruitAntifeedant against fall armyworms, Spodoptera frugiperda[19,37]
SalanninSeed, fruitAntifeedant and weight reduction against Acalymma vittata, Musca domestica, Epilachna varivestis, Heliothis virescens, Spodoptera frugiperda, Earias insulana, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis and Spodoptera littoralis[7,37,38]
ToosendaninRoot barkGrowth inhibitor and oviposition deterrent against Ostrinia nubilalis, Pieris brassicae, Trichoplusia ni[16,22]
MeliantriolNot reportedAntifeedant[15]
Unsaturated fatty acids (oleic acid, linoleic acid and gadoleic acid); saturated fatty acids (palmitic acid, stearic acid and arachidic acid)SeedSynergistic enhancement of insecticidal activity[39,40]
1-cinnamoyltrichilininNot reportedAntifeedant against Spodoptera littoralis[7]
1-tigloyltrichilininNot reportedAntifeedant against Spodoptera eridania[7]
1-acetyltrichilininNot reportedAntifeedant against Spodoptera eridania[7]
Nimbolin BNot reportedAntifeedant against Spodoptera species. (exigua, eridania and littoralis)[7,51]
Ohchinin-3-acetateFruitAntifeedant[42]
* Non exhaustive list of compounds present in M. volkensii.

References

  1. Bhuiyan, K.R.; Hassan, E.; Isman, M.B. Growth inhibitory and lethal effects of some botanical insecticides and potential synergy by dillapiol in Spodoptera litura (Fab.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2001, 108, 82–88. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rai, M.; Carpinella, M.C. Naturally Occurring Bioactive Compounds, 3rd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  3. Agbo, B.E.; Nta, A.I.; Ajaba, M.O. Bio-pesticidal properties of Neem (Azadirachta indica). Adv. Trends Agric. Sci. 2019, 1, 17–26. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mulholland, D.A.; Parel, B.; Coombes, P.H. The chemistry of the Meliaceae and Ptaeroxylaceae of Southern and Eastern Africa and Madagascar. Curr. Org. Chem. 2000, 4, 1011–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Baskar, K.; Mohankumar, S.; Sudha, V.; Mahetswaran, R.; Vijayal.akshmi, S.; Jayakumar, M. Meliaceae plant extracts as potential mosquitocides—A review. Entomol. Ornithol. Herpetol. 2016, 5, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, L.; Huo, C.-H.; Shen, L.-R.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Shi, Q.-W. Chemical constituents of plants from the Genus Melia. Chem. Biodivers. 2010, 7, 839–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tan, Q.-G.; Luo, X.-D. Meliaceous limonoids: Chemistry and biological activities. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 7437–7522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rana, A. Melia azedarach: A phytopharmacological review. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2008, 2, 173–179. [Google Scholar]
  9. Al-Rubae, A.Y. The potential uses of Melia azedarach L. as pesticidal and medicinal plant, review. Am. Eurasian J. Sustain. Agric. 2009, 3, 185–194. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jagannathan, R.; Ramesh, R.V.; Kalyanakumar, V. A review of neem derivatives and their agricultural applications. Int. J. Pharm. Technol. 2015, 6, 3010–3016. [Google Scholar]
  11. Stevenson, P.C.; Isman, M.B.; Belmain, S.R. Pesticidal plants in Africa: A global vision of new biological control products from local uses. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 110, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Paritala, V.; Chiruvella, K.K.; Thammineni, C.; Ghanta, R.G.; Mohammed, A. Phytochemicals and antimicrobial potentials of mahogany family. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2015, 25, 61–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Su, M.; Mulla, M.S. Activity and biological effects of neem products against arthropods of medical and veterinary importance. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 1999, 15, 133–152. [Google Scholar]
  14. Nathan, S.S.; Savitha, G.; George, D.K.; Narmadha, A.; Suganya, L.; Chung, P.G. Efficacy of Melia azedarach L. extract on the malarial vector Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera: Culicidae). Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 1316–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mwangi, R.W. Locust antifeedant activity in fruits of Melia volkensii. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1982, 32, 277–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mitchell, P.L.; Thielen, J.B.; Stell, F.M.; Fescemyer, H.W. Activity of Melia volkensii (Meliaceae) extract against Southern green stink bug (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). J. Agric. Urban Entomol. 2004, 21, 131–141. [Google Scholar]
  17. Al-Sharook, Z.; Balan, K.; Jiang, Y.; Rembold, H. Insect growth inhibitors from two tropical Meliaceae: Effect of crude seed extracts on mosquito larvae. J. Appl. Entomol. 1991, 111, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Koul, O.; Jain, M.P.; Sharma, V.K. Growth inhibitory and antifeedant activity of extracts from Melia dubia to Spodoptera litura and Helicoverpa armigera larvae. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2000, 38, 63–68. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sombatsiri, K.; Ermel, K.; Schmutterer, H. Other Meliaceous Plants Containing Ingredients for Integrated Pest Management and Further Purposes. In The Neem Tree; VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1995; pp. 642–666. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mwangi, R.W.; Mukiama, T.K. Studies of insecticidal and growth-regulating activity in extracts of Melia volkensii (Gurke), an indigenous tree in Kenya. East Afr. Agric. For. J. 1989, 54, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wycliffe, W. Toxicological studies of fruit powder and extracted cake of Melia volkensii Guerke (Family: Meliaceae) on Maasai goats in Kenya. Int. J. Pharm. Chem. 2017, 3, 82–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kamau, R.W.; Juma, B.F.; Baraza, L.D. Antimicrobial compounds from root, stem bark and seeds of Melia volkensii. Nat. Prod. Res. 2016, 30, 1984–1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kenya Forest Service. Guidelines to On-Farm Melia volkensii Growing in the Dryland Areas of Kenya; CADEP-SFM: Nairobi, Kenya, 2018.
  24. Wekesa, L.; Muturi, G.; Mulatya, J.; Esilaba, A.; Keya, G.; Ihure, S. Economic viability of Melia volkensii (Gurkii) production on smallholdings in drylands of Kenya. Int. Res. J. Agric. Sci. Soil Sci. 2012, 2, 364–369. [Google Scholar]
  25. Isman, M.B. Tropical forests as sources of natural insecticides. In Chemical Ecology and Phytochemistry of Forest Ecosystems; University of British Columbia: Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2009; pp. 145–160. [Google Scholar]
  26. Diop, B.; Wilps, H. Field trials with neem oil and Melia volkensii extracts on Schistocerca gregaria. In New Strategies in Locust Control; Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland, 1997; pp. 201–207. [Google Scholar]
  27. Nasseh, O.; Wilps, H.; Rembold, H.; Krall, S. Biologically active compounds in Melia volkensii: Larval growth and phase modulator against the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria (Forskal) Orth., Cyrtacanthacrinae. J. Appl. Entomol. 1993, 116, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gokce, A.; Stelinski, L.L.; Whalon, M.E.; Gut, L.J. Toxicity and antifeedant activity of selected plant extracts against larval obliquebanded leafroller, Christoneura rosaceana (Harris). Open Entomol. J. 2010, 4, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Akhtar, Y.; Isman, M.B. Comparative growth inhibitory and antifeedant effects of plant extracts and pure allelochemicals on four phytophagous insect species. J. Appl. Entomol. 2004, 128, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Akhtar, Y.; Rankin, C.H.; Isman, M.B. Decreased response to feeding deterrents following prolonged exposure in the larvae of a generalist herbivore, Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctidae). J. Insect Behav. 2003, 16, 811–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Akhtar, Y.; Isman, M.B. Feeding responses of specialist herbivores to plant extracts and pure allellochemicals: Effect of prolonged exposure. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2004, 111, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Akhtar, Y.; Yeoung, Y.R.; Isman, M.B. Comparative bioactivity of selected extracts from Meliaceae and some commercial botanical insecticides against two noctuid caterpillars, Trichoplusia ni and Pseudaletia unipuncta. Phytochem. Rev. 2008, 7, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Irungu, L.W.; Mwangi, R.W. Effects of a biologically active fraction from Melia volkensii on Culex quinquefasciatus. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 1995, 16, 159–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Awala, P.; Mwangi, R.W.; Irungu, L.W. Larvicidal activity of a granular formulation of a Melia volkensii (Gurke) acetone extract against Aedes aegypti L. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 1998, 18, 225–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Isman, M. Insect antifeedants. Pestic. Outlook 2002, 13, 152–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pan, L.; Ren, L.; Chen, F.; Feng, Y.; Luo, Y. Antifeedant activity of Ginkgo biloba secondary metabolites against Hyphantria cunea larvae: Mechanisms and application. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0155682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Rajab, M.S.; Bentley, M.D.; Alford, A.R.; Mendel, M.J. A new limonoid insect antifeedant from the fruits of Melia volkensii. J. Nat. Prod. 1988, 511, 168–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Champagne, D.E.; Koul, O.; Isman, M.B.; Scudder, G.G.; Towers, G.N. Biological activity of limonoids from the rutales. Phytochemistry 1992, 31, 377–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Milimo, P.B. Chemical composition of Melia volkensii Gurke: An unrealised browse potential of semi-arid agroforestry systems. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1994, 64, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Puritch, G.S.; Condrashoff, S.F. Insecticide Mixtures Containing Fatty Acids. U.S. Patent 4,861,762, 29 August 1989. [Google Scholar]
  41. Rogers, L.L.; Zeng, L.; McLaughlin, J.L. New bioactive steroids from Melia volkensii. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 3781–3785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rajab, M.S.; Bentley, M.D. Tetranotriterpenes from Melia volkensii. J. Nat. Prod. 1988, 51, 840–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kurimoto, S.I.; Takaishi, Y.; Ahmed, F.A.; Kashiwada, Y. Triterpenoids from fruits of Azadirachta indica (Meliaceae). Fitoterapia 2014, 92, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rogers, L.L.; Zeng, L.; McLaughlin, J.L. Volkensinin: A new limonoid from Melia volkensii. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 4623–4626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rogers, L.L.; Zeng, L.; Kozlowski, J.F.; Shimada, H.; Alali, F.Q.; Johnson, H.A.; McLaughlin, J.L. New bioactive triterpenoids from Melia volkensii. J. Nat. Prod. 1998, 61, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zeng, L.; Gu, Z.M.; Chang, C.J.; Wood, K.V.; McLaughlin, J.L. Meliavolkenin, a new bioactive triterpenoid from Melia volkensii (Meliacae). Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1995, 3, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zeng, L.; Gu, Z.M.; Chang, C.J.; Smith, D.L.; McLaughlin, J.L. A pair of new apotirucallane trirerpenes, meliavolkensins A and B, from Melia volkensii (Meliaceae). Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 1995, 5, 181–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Di Filippo, M.; Fezza, F.; Izzo, I.; De Riccardis, F.; Sodano, G. Novel syntheses of (E)- and (Z)-Volkendousin, cytotoxic steroid from the plant Melia volkensii. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 18, 3247–3252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zeng, L.; Gu, Z.M.; Fang, X.P.; Fanwick, P.E.; Chang, C.J.; Smith, D.L.; McLaughlin, J.L. Two new bioactive triterpenoids from Melia volkensii (Meliaceae). Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 2477–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cantrell, C.L.; Franzblau, S.G.; Fischer, N.H. Antimycobacterial plant terpenoids. Plant Med. 2001, 67, 685–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Romeo, J.T. Phytochemicals in Human Health Protection, Nutrition, and Plant Defense; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Melia volkensii and its various parts: (a) 10-year old M. volkensii plantation, (b) leaves, (c) seeds, (d) fruits and (e) nuts [23].
Figure 1. Melia volkensii and its various parts: (a) 10-year old M. volkensii plantation, (b) leaves, (c) seeds, (d) fruits and (e) nuts [23].
Plants 09 00143 g001
Figure 2. Chemical structures of compounds isolated from Melia volkensii with antifeedant and growth-inhibition activity against insects.
Figure 2. Chemical structures of compounds isolated from Melia volkensii with antifeedant and growth-inhibition activity against insects.
Plants 09 00143 g002
Figure 3. Chemical structures of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids isolated from Melia volkensii.
Figure 3. Chemical structures of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids isolated from Melia volkensii.
Plants 09 00143 g003
Figure 4. Further chemical structures of compounds isolated from Melia volkensii with antifeedant and growth-inhibition activity against insects.
Figure 4. Further chemical structures of compounds isolated from Melia volkensii with antifeedant and growth-inhibition activity against insects.
Plants 09 00143 g004

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jaoko, V.; Nji Tizi Taning, C.; Backx, S.; Mulatya, J.; Van den Abeele, J.; Magomere, T.; Olubayo, F.; Mangelinckx, S.; Werbrouck, S.P.O.; Smagghe, G. The Phytochemical Composition of Melia volkensii and Its Potential for Insect Pest Management. Plants 2020, 9, 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9020143

AMA Style

Jaoko V, Nji Tizi Taning C, Backx S, Mulatya J, Van den Abeele J, Magomere T, Olubayo F, Mangelinckx S, Werbrouck SPO, Smagghe G. The Phytochemical Composition of Melia volkensii and Its Potential for Insect Pest Management. Plants. 2020; 9(2):143. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9020143

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jaoko, Victor, Clauvis Nji Tizi Taning, Simon Backx, Jackson Mulatya, Jan Van den Abeele, Titus Magomere, Florence Olubayo, Sven Mangelinckx, Stefaan P.O. Werbrouck, and Guy Smagghe. 2020. "The Phytochemical Composition of Melia volkensii and Its Potential for Insect Pest Management" Plants 9, no. 2: 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9020143

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop