Next Article in Journal
Endolichenic Fungi: A Promising Medicinal Microbial Resource to Discover Bioactive Natural Molecules—An Update
Previous Article in Journal
Biodegradable Mulch Films and Bioformulations Based on Trichoderma sp. and Seaweed Extract Differentially Affect the Metabolome of Industrial Tomato Plants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Six New Species of Agaricus (Agaricaceae, Agaricales) from Northeast China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Contribution to the Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Hydnum (Cantharellales, Basidiomycota) from China

1
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Microbial Culture Collection and Application, State Key Laboratory of Applied Microbiology Southern China, Institute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510070, China
2
Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture Forestry and Grassland Science Research Institute, Chuxiong 675000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Fungi 2024, 10(2), 98; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10020098
Submission received: 13 December 2023 / Revised: 21 January 2024 / Accepted: 22 January 2024 / Published: 25 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Molecular Systematics)

Abstract

:
Hydnum is a well-characterized genus in the family Hydnaceae of Cantharellales and is characterized by spinose hymenophores. In this study, an ITS phylogenetic overview and a multilocus (ITS-nrLSU-tef1) phylogenetic tree of Hydnum were carried out. On the basis of morphological characteristics and phylogenetic results, seven species from China were confirmed, described, illustrated, and compared with similar species, including three new species, i.e., H. longipes, H. microcarpum, and H. sinorepandum, and four known species, i.e., H. cremeoalbum, H. melitosarxm, H. orientalbidum, and H. pinicola were recorded for the first time in China. A key to the species of Hydnum in China was provided.

1. Introduction

Hydnum L., typified by H. repandum L., belongs to Basidiomycota, Basidiomycetes, Cantharellales, Hydnaceae [1,2]. Morphologically, Hydnum species are notable for having spinose hymenophores; in addition, they have pileate and stipitate basidiocarps, stichic basidia, and smooth basidiospores. Phylogenetically, Hydnum is the sister group of Sistotrema, and they are closely related to the genera Cantharellus and Craterellus [2]. Economically, some Hydnum species (named “hedgehogs”, “sweet tooth”, or “tooth fungus”) are collected and consumed as edible mushrooms. For example, H. jussii Niskanen, Liimat. & Kytöv, “H. repandum complex”, H. vesterholtii Olariaga, Grebenc, Salcedo & M.P. Martín are important wild edible mushrooms in southwestern China [3,4]. Ecologically, as a cosmopolitan genus, Hydnum plays an important role in forest ecology and can form ectomycorrhizal associations with many trees, e.g., Betulaceae, Fagales, and Pinaceae [2,5,6].
Phylogenetic studies proved that Hydnum is a monophyletic group [1,2,7], and five subgenera, i.e., subg. Alba, subg. Brevispina, subg. Hydnum, subg. Pallida, and subg. Rufescentia have been recognized within the genus [2,6]. Apart from subg. Alba, the other four subgenera are monophyletic groups. Of the five subgenera, subg. Rufescentia contains the most known species.
Studies on the species diversity of Hydnum in China have accelerated in recent years. Previously, only three species (H. repandum, H. repandum var. album, and H. rufescens) were recorded in China before 2016 [5,8,9]. Feng et al. [5] conducted a molecular phylogenetic study on Hydnum in China, and the results showed that Hydnum species are very diverse in China. Cao et al. [2] reported twelve species of Hydnum in China, including ten new species. Until now, about 18 species have been reported from China [2,3,4,5,8,9,10]. In recent years, we have carried out investigations on the species diversity of Hydnaceae in southern China and found 11 new species of Cantharellus [11,12]. In this study, three new species of Hydnum are described and discussed, and four species are described in China for the first time.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Morphological Studies

Photographs and field notes of the fresh basidiomata were taken in the field or laboratory. Specimens were dried and deposited in the Fungarium of Guangdong Institute of Microbiology (GDGM). Descriptions of macro-morphological characteristics and habitats were obtained from field notes and photographs. Color codes followed Kornerup and Wanscher [13]. Micro-morphological observations were carried out on tissues stained with 5% KOH and 1% aqueous Congo red under a light microscope (Olympus BX51, Tokyo, Japan). For basidiospore size descriptions, the notation (a–)b–c(–d) is used, where the range b–c represented 90% or more of the measured values and ‘a’ and ‘d’ represented the extreme values; ‘av.’ represents the mean range of basidiospore length or width; Q referred to the length/width ratio of an individual basidiospore; and Qm referred to the average Q value of all basidiospores ± sample standard deviation. All line drawings of microstructures were made based on rehydrated materials.

2.2. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification and Sequencing

Total genomic DNA of the voucher specimens was extracted using the Sangon Fungus Genomic DNA Extraction kit (Sangon Biotech Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Primer pairs ITS5/ITS4 [14], LR0R/LR5 [15], and tef1F/tef1R [16] were used for amplifying and sequencing these sequences: ITS, nrLSU, and tef1, respectively. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reactions were performed in a total volume of 25 μL containing 0.5 μL template DNA, 11 μL distilled water, 0.5 μL of each primer, and 12.5 μL 2 × PCR mix (DreamTaqtm Green PCR Master Mix, Fermentas, MA, USA). PCR amplification reactions were performed in a Professional Standard Thermocycler (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany) as follows: denaturation at 95 °C for 4 min; 35 cycles (denaturation at 94 °C for 60 s, annealing at 53 °C (ITS and LSU)/50 °C (tef1) for 60 s, and extension at 72 °C for 60 s); and a final extension at 72 °C for 8 min. The PCR products were electrophoresed on 1% agarose gels and sequencing was performed on an ABI Prism® 3730 Genetic Analyzer (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA) at the Beijing Genomic Institute (BGI). The raw sequences were assembled and edited using SeqMan implemented in Lasergene v7.1 (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI, USA) and deposited in GenBank.

2.3. Phylogenetic Analyses

Sequences generated in this study and those downloaded from GenBank were combined and used for phylogenetic reconstruction. The sequence matrix of ITS, nrLSU, and tef1 were separately aligned with MAFFT v7 software using the E-INS-i strategy [17] and manually adjusted in MEGA 6 [18]. Phylogenetic analyses were performed in PhyloSuite [19]. Maximum likelihood phylogenies were inferred using IQ-TREE [20]. Best models for ITS datasets were searched via ModelFinder [21], and the ITS-LSU-tef1 combined datasets were searched via PartitionFinder 2 [22]. The phylogenetic trees were visualized using FigTree v1.4.23.

3. Results

3.1. Molecular Phylogeny

In the ITS dataset, 410 sequences were included for phylogenetic analysis. The alignment had 843 characters including gaps, and K80 + G4 was selected as the best model for maximum likelihood phylogenies. Sistotrema muscicola (Pers.) S. Lundell was selected as an outgroup based on recent studies [2,6]. The ITS phylogenetic tree is shown in Figure 1. In the concatenated (ITS + LSU + tef1) dataset, the alignment has 274 samples with 3348 columns, 1224 distinct patterns, 764 parsimony-informative, 160 singleton sites, and 2424 constant sites. The best-fit models HKY + F + R3 and TIM3 + F + R2 were selected for the ITS + tef1 and LSU regions, respectively. The multilocus (ITS + LSU + tef1) phylogenetic tree is shown in Figure 2. In total, 51 sequences were newly generated and deposited in GenBank in present study.
Phylogenetic analyses show that the maximum likelihood topologies obtained from the ITS and the concatenated (ITS + LSU + tef1) datasets in our study are similar to the phylogram in previous studies [2,23]. The newly generated sequences were classified into seven species-level clades, all with high support values (BS = 100%). Among these, GDGM87902 and GDGM87902-1 formed a distinct lineage in the subg. Brevispina; GDGM82458, together with an unnamed sequence (Hydnum sp. HKAS57385), formed a monophyletic lineage which nested into the subg. Rufescentia; GDGM82445, GDGM82416, GDGM82382, and GDGM90134, together with five sequences named as Hydnum sp. 8, formed a distinct lineage in subg. Hydnum; GDGM93020 and GDGM83047 nested into the H. pinicola clade; GDGM93011 and GDGM87013 nested into the H. cremeoalbum clade; and GDGM93480, GDGM93019, and GDGM91301 nested into the H. orientalbidum clade.

3.2. Taxonomy

Below, three new species and four known species of Hydnum from China are described, illustrated, and discussed. The descriptions are arranged alphabetically.
Hydnum cremeoalbum Liimat. & Niskanen; Figure 3a and Figure 4.
Basidiocarps medium to large sized, solitary to scattered. Pileus 30–100 mm broad, convex to subapplanate, usually depressed in the center, margin thin, even, decurved at first; surface dry, glabrous, white to cream white, unchanging when bruised. Context 3–8 mm thick, white, unchanging when exposed. Hymenophore spinose, adnate, not decurrent; spines conical to aciculate, crowded, subulate, 2–5 mm long, shortest near the pileus margin, yellowish-white, orange-white to pale orange (3A2–5A2, 4A3–5A3). Stipes central to slightly eccentric, 20–40 mm long, 10–20 mm wide, subcylindrical, slightly tapering downward, solid; surface dry, glabrous, white, unchanging when bruised; basal mycelium white. Odor indistinctive. Taste none.
Basidiospores 4–5.5 × 3.5–4.5 μm, av. 4.73 ± 0.38 × 3.88 ± 0.35, Q = 1.1–1.42, Qm = 1.22 ± 0.09, broadly elliptical to subglobose, smooth, thin-walled, hyaline, some with granular contents. Basidia 30–40 × 4–7 μm, subclavate to clavate, 2- to 6-spored, sterigmata 3–5 μm long. Basidioles numerous, subcylindrical or subclavate, sometimes covered with a yellowish granular substance at the apex. Cystidia absent. Hyphae of spine apex cylindrical, thin-walled, yellowish to hyaline in KOH, 3–6 μm wide. Pileipellis a mixocutis, composed of cylindrical, thin-walled, branched hyphae, 2–5 μm wide. Stipitipellis composed of parallel, thin-walled hyphae, 2–6 μm wide. Clamp connections present.
Habitat and distribution: solitary or gregarious in broad-leaved or mixed forests mainly dominated by Fagaceae trees (such as Castanopsis eyrei, C. fissa, C. lamontii, and Cyclobalanopis chungii). Known from southern China and Japan.
Specimens examined: CHINA. Guangdong Province, Meizhou City, Fengshun Town, 15 February 2022, Wangqiu Deng and Ting Li (GDGM87013); Hubei Province, Yichang City, Changyang County, Langping Town, 28 October 2023, Qinfang Luo (GDGM93011).
Notes—Hydnum cremeoalbum, recently described from Japan [6], is firstly recorded in China in this study. The morphological description is short in Niskanen et al. [6]. Sugawara et al. [24] gave a detailed description of H. cremeoalbum after re-studying the type specimen and examining a large number of specimens collected from Japan. Morphologically, H. cremeoalbum is mainly characterized by the cream-white pileus which first changes to pale ocher when bruised and finally staining greenish to bluish green, the pale cream to pale orange spines, and the broadly ellipsoid basidiospores measuring 5–6.5 × 4–5.5 µm [24]. It is worth noting that the discoloration of basidiocarps from greenish to bluish green is rare in Hydnum species [24].
Phylogenetic analyses (Figure 1 and Figure 2) shows that two specimens from China are nested into the H. cremeoalbum clade with well-supported evidence. Morphological comparisons also showed that most features of our specimens are consistent with the description of H. cremeoalbum, except that the discoloration was not observed in the present study.
Hydnum longipes Ming Zhang & C.Q. Wang sp. nov.; Figure 3b and Figure 5.
Fungal Name: FN571736
Etymology—Refers to the species with a long stipe.
Type—CHINA. Yunnan Province, Shangrila, Bitahai National Natural Reserve, 27°49′ N, 99°57′ E, elev. 3560 m, on soil under Quercus aquifolioides Rehd. et Wils. and Pinus densata Mast. dominated forests, 2 September 2020, Ming Zhang (GDGM82458).
Diagnosis—Hydnum longipes can be distinguished from the other Hydnum species by the combination of orange-to-reddish orange pileus, orange-white spines, a longer stipe, and subglobose basidiospores measuring 8–10 × 7–8.5 μm.
Basidiocarps small sized, solitary to scattered. Pileus 20–30 mm broad, convex to subapplanate, usually depressed in the center, margin thin, even, decurved at first; surface dry, glabrous, irregularly bumpy or mottled, orange, light orange, pastel red to reddish-orange (5A7–8A7, 5A5–8A5), changing to orange-white when bruised. Context 1–2 mm thick, orange-white (5A2). Hymenophore spinose, adnate, not decurrent; spines conical to aciculate, crowded, subulate, orange-white to pale orange (4A2–5A2, 4A3–5A3), 1–3 mm long, shorter near the pileus margin. Stipe central to slightly eccentric, 50–80 mm long, 3–6 mm wide, subcylindrical, slightly enlarged downward, hollow; surface dry, glabrous, orange-white to pale orange (4A2–5A2, 4A3–5A3), slightly changing to orange-white when bruised; basal mycelium white. Odor indistinctive. Taste none.
Basidiospores (7.5)8–10(10.5) × (6) 7–8.5(9) μm, av. 9.32 ± 0.77 × 7.63 ± 0.87, Q = 1.05–1.43, Qm = 1.23 ± 0.11, broadly elliptical to subglobose, smooth, thin-walled, hyaline, some with granular contents. Basidia 45–55 × 7–12 μm, subclavate to clavate, 2- to 6-spored, sterigmata 4–8 μm long, 1–2 μm wide at base, slightly curving. Basidioles numerous, subcylindrical or subclavate, usually covered with a yellowish granular substance at the apex. Cystidia absent. Hyphae of spine apex are cylindrical, thin-walled, yellowish to hyaline in KOH, 3–6 μm wide. Pileipellis a cutis composed of cylindrical, thin-walled, subparallel, rarely branched hyphae, 5–16 μm wide; terminal cells 70–135 × 5–16 μm. Stipitipellis composed of parallel, thin-walled hyphae, 3–8 μm wide. Clamp connections present.
Habitat and distribution—Growing solitarily or gregariously in subalpine mixed forests mainly dominated by Quercus aquifolioides and Pinus densata. So far known from southwestern China.
Notes—Phylogentic analysis showed that H. longipes formed a distinct lineage in subg. Rufescentia, and is closely related to H. canadense, H. mulsicolor, and H. submulsicolor. Based on the morphological characteristics given above and the phylogentic results, H. longipes should be a member within subsect. Mulsicoloria.
Morphologically, H. canadense differs from H. longipes by its cream-colored spines, shorter and white-to-cream stipe, globose-to-subglobose basidiospores (7–9 × 7–9 μm, Q = 1–1.11), smaller basidia; in addition, H. canadense is only known in high-elevation conifer forests in North America [25]. Hydnum mulsicolor, originally reported from Slovenia, differs in having larger basidiocarps (pileus 30–45 mm broad), bright orange-to-tan pileus usually distinctly umbilicate at center, strongly decurrent pinkish-cream spines, a shorter stipe with distinct rhizomorphs at the base, and smaller basidiospores (6.5–8.5 × 6–8.5 μm) [6,25]. Hydnum submulsicolor, originally described form Canada, differs by its relatively larger basidiocarps (pileus 30–50 mm broad), orange ochraceous to more brownish ochraceous pileus, and the whitish-to-pale ochraceous brown spines [6].
Hydnum melitosarx Ruots., Huhtinen, Olariaga, Niskanen, Liimat. & Ammirati; Figure 3c and Figure 6.
Basidiocarps small sized, solitary, scattered to gregarious. Pileus 20–40 mm broad, convex to subapplanate, margin thin, even, decurved at first; surface dry, glabrous, irregularly bumpy or mottled, reddish-yellow, light yellow, light orange to orange, pale yellow to pale orange (4A5–5A5, 4A6–5A6). Context 2–4 mm thick, white, unchanging or slightly changing pale orange when exposed. Hymenophore spinose, adnate; spines conical to aciculate, crowded, subulate, white, yellowish white to pale orange (3A2–5A2, 3A3–5A3), 2–5 mm long, shortest near the pileus margin. Stipes central to slightly eccentric, 20–40 mm long, 4–8 mm wide, subcylindrical, solid; surface dry, glabrous, white, to orange-white (5A2), unchanging or changing pale orange when handled; basal mycelium white. Odor indistinctive. Taste none.
Basidiospores 8–11 × 7–10 μm, av. 9.37 ± 0.65 × 8.71 ± 0.30, Q = 1.0–1.28, Qm = 1.07 ± 0.06, broadly ellipsoid to ovia, smooth, thin-walled, hyaline, some with granular contents. Basidia 40–70 × 10–15 μm, subclavate to clavate, 2- to 6-spored, sterigmata 3–6 μm long, 1–1.5 μm wide at base. Basidioles numerous, subcylindrical or subclavate. Cystidia absent. Hyphae of spine apex cylindrical, thin-walled, yellowish to hyaline in KOH, 2–7 μm wide. Pileipellis composed of cylindrical hyphae, thin-walled, subparallel, rarely branched, 2–13 μm wide. Stipitipellis composed of parallel hyphae, thin-walled, 3–12 μm wide. Clamp connections present.
Habitat and distribution—Growing in solitary or gregarious conditions under broad-leaved forests mainly dominated by Fagaceae trees (such as Quercus aquifolioides and Q. pannosa) or in mixed forests dominated by Picea trees mixed with a small number of Betula, Alnus, Salix, and Populus. Known from Asia, Europe, and North America.
Specimens examined—CHINA. Sichuan Province, Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture, Jiuzhaigou County, 20 September 2020, elev. 2600 m, Ming Zhang (GDGM84518); Sichuan Province, Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture, Lixian County, Miaro Scenic Area, 4 August 2020, elev. 2600 m, Chaoqun Wang (GDGM81873, GDGM81826).
Notes—As Niskanen et al. [6] mentioned, the Chinese H. melitosarx is also characterized by its pale orange-brown ochraceous to orange-brown ochraceous pileus, whitish spines, relatively longer stipe. However, the Chinese specimens have larger basidiospores (8–11 × 7–10 μm and av. = 9.37 × 8.71 μm vs. 7.0–8.6 × 6.4–7.8 μm and av. = 7.9 × 7.2 μm) [6].
In the present study (Figure 1 and Figure 2), two specimens (GDGM81873 and GDGM84518), together with several sequences labelled as “Hydnum rufescens” from China, are well nested into the H. melitosarx clade. Although the distribution of this species in China was found by previous analysis [6], no detailed morphology studies have been conducted. This study is the first to describe this species in detail based on Chinese materials. It is worth mentioning that H. melitosarx is a pan-Arctic distributed species, so far known from Andorra, China, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Solenia, Sweden, and the USA [6].
Hydnum microcarpum Ming Zhang sp. nov. Figure 3f and Figure 7.
Fungal Name: FN571762
Etymology—‘microcarpum’ refers to the species with a smaller basidiocarp.
Type—CHINA. Guangdong Province, Huizhou City, Luofushan Scenic Spot, 23°15′ N, 114°00′ E, elev. 600 m, on soil under mixed forests dominated by Fagaceae trees (such as Castanopsis cuspidata, C. eyrei, C. fabri, C. fissa, and Lithocarpus spp.) mixed with Pinus massoniana Lamb., 1 March 2022, Guorui Zhong (GDGM87902).
Diagnosis—This species is characterized by its small basidiocarps, yellowish white to orange-white pileus changing from brownish orange to brownish red when bruised, yellowish white spines, and relatively small basidiospores.
Basidiocarps small sized, solitary to scattered. Pileus 10–20 mm broad, convex to subapplanate, margin thin, even, decurved at first; surface dry, glabrous, white, yellowish white to orange-white (3A2–5A2), changing from brownish orange to brownish red when bruised or dry (5C5–8C5). Context 1–2 mm thick, yellowish white (4A2). Hymenophore spinose, adnate to subdecurrent, spines crowded, subulate, acute, straight, solitary, evenly distributed, white to yellowish white (3A2–5A2) when fresh, grayish yellow to grayish orange (4B5–6B5) when dry; 0.5–1.5 mm long, shorter toward pileus margin. Stipes central to slightly eccentric, 15–25 mm long, 4–6 mm wide, subcylindrical, surface dry, glabrous or glandular, white, staining orange-white (4A2–5A2) when bruised; basal mycelium white, usually forming rhizomorphs at base. Odor indistinctive. Taste unrecorded.
Basidiospores 5–6(–6.5) × 5–5.5(–6) μm, av. 5.78 ± 0.31 × 5.26 ± 0.36, Q = 1–1.2, Qm = 1.10 ± 0.08, broadly elliptical to subglobose, smooth, thin-walled, hyaline, some with granular contents. Basidia 27–40 × 7–10 μm, subclavate to clavate, 4- or 6-spored, sterigmata 4–6 μm long, 1 μm wide at base. Basidioles numerous, subcylindrical or subclavate, usually covered with yellowish granular substance at apex. Cystidia absent. Hyphae of spine apex cylindrical, thin-walled, yellowish to hyaline in KOH, 2–6 μm wide. Pileipellis composed of cylindrical hyphae, thin-walled, subparallel, rarely branched; terminal elements rounded at apex, cells 80–135 × 7–12 μm. Stipitipellis composed of parallel hyphae, thin-walled, 2–7 μm wide. Clamp connections present.
Habitat and distribution—Growing in solitary or gregarious conditions under mixed forests in the subtropical region of southern China, which is mainly dominated by Castanopsis trees and Lithocarpus trees mixed with a small number of Pinus massoniana. So far only known from southern China.
Notes—In both the ITS and multilocus phylogenetic analyses (Figure 1 and Figure 2), the new species H. microcarpum formed an independent lineage, close to H. alboluteum R. Sugaw. & N. Endo, H. brevispinum T. Cao & H.S. Yuan, and H. tenuistipitum T. Cao & H.S. Yuan. Based on the morphological features given above and the phylogenetic evidence, the new species H. microcarpum is a member of subg. Brevispina, which has been recently established in Cao et al. [2].
Morphologically, H. alboluteum differs by its larger basidiocarps (pileus 20–55 mm broad), longer spines up to 6 mm long, and larger basidiospores (6.5–8 × 5.5–7.5 µm) [24]. Hydnum brevispinum differs by its more broadly elliptical basidiospores (5–5.8 × 3.8–4.8 μm) with large Q values (Q = 1.27–1.31) [2], and the difference in ITS sequence, with a similarity ratio of only 94.35% with H. microcarpum in the Blast search. Hydnum tenuistipitum can be easily distinguished by its larger basidiospores (6.8–7.2 × 5.5–6.5 μm) and basidia (45–63 × 3–12 μm) [2]. In addition, H. minum Yanaga & N. Maek., recently reported from Japan, also resemble H. microcarpum with small basidiocarps, but differ in having whitish to cream-yellow spines, and smaller basidiospores (4.5–5.5 × 3–4.5 mm) with a larger Q value (av. Q = 1.3) [26].
Hydnum orientalbidum R. Sugaw. & N. Endo; Figure 3d and Figure 8.
Basidiocarps small to medium sized, solitary, scattered to gregarious. Pileus 30–60 mm broad, convex to subapplanate, margin thin, even, decurved at first; surface dry, glabrous, white. Context 3–4 mm thick, white, unchanging when exposed. Hymenophore spinose, adnate; spines conical to aciculate, crowded, subulate, white, 2–3 mm long, shortest near the pileus margin. Stipes central to slightly eccentric, 30–50 mm long, 8–15 mm wide, subcylindrical, solid; surface dry, glabrous, white; basal mycelium white. Odor indistinctive. Taste none.
Basidiospores 4–5 × 3.5–4.5 μm, av. 4.65 ± 0.41 × 3.96 ± 0.37, Q = 1.1–1.28, Qm = 1.17 ± 0.06, broadly ellipsoid to ovia, smooth, thin-walled, hyaline, some with granular contents. Basidia 20–40 × 5–7 μm, subclavate to clavate, 2- to 6-spored, sterigmata 3–6 μm long, 1–1.5 μm wide at base. Basidioles numerous, subcylindrical or subclavate. Cystidia absent. Hyphae of spine apex cylindrical, thin-walled, yellowish to hyaline in KOH, 2–6 μm wide. Pileipellis composed of cylindrical hyphae, thin-walled, subparallel, rarely branched, 5–13 μm wide. Stipitipellis composed of parallel hyphae, thin-walled, 2–5 μm wide, containing brownish cytoplasmic pigment. Clamp connections present.
Habitat and distribution—Growing in solitary or gregarious conditions under broad-leaved forests mainly dominated by Castanopsis and Quercus trees. Known from China and Japan.
Specimen examined—CHINA. Sichuan Province, Bazhong City, Guangwushan National Geopark, 21 October 2023, elev. 2500 m, Yi Yang (GDGM93019). Chongqing City, Wushan Town, 14 November 2023, Jiaxi Pan (GDGM93480); Zhejiang Provice, Hangzhou City, Hangzhou Botanical Garden, 6 April 2023, elve. 80 m, Qingqing Huang (GDGM91301).
Notes—The Chinese specimens share consistent characteristics with previous descriptions of H. orientalbidum [24], but the color change is not observed in the present study. Phylogenetic analyses on the basis of ITS and multilocus datasets show that three specimens from China are well nested into the H. orientalbidum clade, which is located at the basal branch.
Hydnum pinicola R. Sugaw. & N. Endo; Figure 3e and Figure 9.
Basidiocarps small to medium sized, solitary, scattered to gregarious. Pileus 25–60 mm broad, convex to subapplanate, margin thin, even, decurved at first; surface dry, glabrous, irregularly bumpy or mottled, white, yellowish white, pale yellow to pale orange (4A2, 4A3–5A3). Context 5–10 mm thick, white, unchanging when exposed. Hymenophore spinose, adnate; spines conical to aciculate, crowded, subulate, orange-white pale orange (5A2–5A3) when fresh, pinkish white to pale red (7A2–8A2) when dry or old; 1.5–3 mm long, shortest near the pileus margin. Stipes central to slightly eccentric, 20–30 mm long, 8–25 mm wide, subcylindrical, solid; surface dry, glabrous, white, unchanging when handled; basal mycelium white. Odor indistinctive. Taste bitter.
Basidiospores 4–6 × 3.5–5 μm, av. 4.72 ± 0.53 × 4.02 ± 0.31, Q = 1.0–1.25, Qm = 1.17 ± 0.08, broadly ellipsoid to ovia, smooth, thin-walled, hyaline, some with granular contents. Basidia 23–43 × 6–8 μm, subclavate to clavate, four- to eight-spored, sterigmata 2–6 μm long, 1–1.5 μm wide at base. Basidioles numerous, subcylindrical or subclavate, sometimes covered with a yellowish granular substance at the apex. Cystidia absent. Hyphae of spine apex cylindrical, thin-walled, yellowish to hyaline in KOH, 3–7 μm wide. Pileipellis composed of cylindrical hyphae, thin-walled, subparallel, rarely branched, 2–17 μm wide. Stipitipellis composed of parallel hyphae, thin-walled, 2–12 μm wide. Clamp connections present.
Habitat and distribution—Growing in solitary or gregarious conditions under mixed forests mainly dominated by Fagaceae trees and mixed with Pinus trees. Currently known from China and Japan.
Specimen examined—CHINA. Hubei Province, Huanggang City, Luotian County, Shengli Town, 22 October 2023, elev. 800, Xiaomei Peng (GDGM93020). Yunnan Province, Lijiang City, Yulong County, Jiuhe Village, 1 September 2020, elev. 2400 m, Ming Zhang (GDGM83047).
Notes—Hydnum pinicola, originally described from Japan, is characterized by its whitish to cream basidiocarps, pale yellow or pale orange spines, and relatively smaller basidiospores (4.5–5.5 × 4–5 µm) [24]. Our specimens generally matched the original description of H. pinicola in morphology and existed in similar habitats. In both the ITS and multilocus phylogenetic analyses (Figure 1 and Figure 2), the new Chinese samples fell into the H. pinicola clade with strong support (BS = 100%). In short, the specimens from southern China are identified as H. pinicola, which was first recorded in China.
Hydnum sinorepandum Ming Zhang & C.Q. Wang sp. nov. Figure 3g,h and Figure 10.
Fungal Name: FN571763
Etymology: Refers to the species reported from China, similar to H. repandum.
Type—CHINA. Yunnan Province, Shangrila, Bitahai National Natural Reserve, 27°49′ N, 99°57′ E, elev. 3560 m, on soil under broad-leaved and mixed forests, 2 September 2020, Ming Zhang (GDGM82445).
Diagnosis—This species is characterized by its relatively large basidiocarps, yellowish white to light orange pileus, bitter context changing to orange-white when bruised, yellowish white spines up to 7 mm long, robust stipe, broadly ellipsoid basidiospores, and sub-alpine distribution.
Basidiocarps medium to large sized, solitary to scattered. Pileus 40–120 mm broad, convex at first, subapplanate when mature, usually depressed in the center or of an irregular shape, margin thin, decurved at first; surface dry, glabrous, irregularly bumpy or mottled, yellowish white, pale yellow, light yellow to light orange (4A1–4A2, 4A4–6A4). Context 3–8 mm thick, white, unchanging or slightly changing from orange-white to pale orange (5A2–5A3) when exposed. Hymenophore spinose, adnate; spines conical to aciculate, crowded, subulate, white, yellowish white, pale yellow to pale orange (4A2, 4A3–5A3), 3–7 mm long, shorter toward the pileus margin. Stipes central to slightly eccentric, 50–100 mm long, 7–20 mm wide, subcylindrical, solid; surface dry, glabrous, white to yellowish white (4A2); basal mycelium white. Odor indistinctive. Taste mild or a little bitter.
Basidiospores (7.5)8–9(10) × 6.5–7.5 μm, av. 8.16 ± 0.53 × 7.12 ± 0.42, Q = 1.0–1.38, Qm = 1.15 ± 0.09, broadly ellipsoid, smooth, thin-walled, hyaline, some with granular contents. Basidia 40–60 × 8–15 μm, subclavate to clavate, 4- to 8-spored, sterigmata 2–7 μm long, 1–3 μm wide at base, slightly curving. Basidioles numerous, subcylindrical or subclavate, usually covered with a yellowish granular substance at the apex. Cystidia absent. Hyphae of spine apex cylindrical, thin-walled, yellowish to hyaline in KOH, 4–7 μm wide. Pileipellis composed of cylindrical hyphae, thin-walled, subparallel, rarely branched; terminal cells up to 150 μm long, 4–12 μm wide. Stipitipellis composed of subparallel to slightly interwoven hyphae, thin-walled, 4–10 μm wide; terminal cell cylindrical, subclavate or irregular shape. Clamp connections present.
Habitat and distribution—Growing in solitary or gregarious conditions under broad-leaved forests of Quercus aquifolioides, Betula albosinensis, Populus tremula, and Rhododendron spp.; and in mixed forests of Quercus, Betula, Rhododendron and Abies georgei in subalpine regions. Currently only known from southwestern China.
Additional specimens examined—CHINA. Yunnan Province, Shangrila, Bitahai National Natural Reserve, 27°49′ N, 99°57′ E, elev. 3560 m, 2 September 2020, Ming Zhang (GDGM82416, GDGM82382); Same location, 4 August 2022, Ming Zhang (GDGM90134).
Notes—Morphologically, H. sinorepandum can be easily misidentified as H. repandum; however, the latter differs by decurrent spines, smaller basidiospores (7.0–8.5 × 6.2–7.5 μm), smaller basidia (35–45 × 6–8 μm), and so far is only known to exist in Europe according to Niskanen et al. [6]. Hydnum boreorepandum and H. repando-orientale also resemble H. sinorepandum. However, H. boreorepandum, reported from Europe, differs by its white to pale cream pileus, tinged pale ochraceous brown to pale brownish orange when bruised, white to cream spines, a slender stipe with rhizomorphs at the base, and relatively smaller basidiospores (7.0–8.5 × 6.2–7.5 μm) [6,24]. Hydnum repando-orientale, reported from Japan, differs by its whitish to cream-white pileus and spines, and smaller basidiospores (7–9 × 5.5–8 μm) [6,24,27].
Both the ITS and multilocus phylogenetic analyses showed that the four Chinese specimens of H. sinorepandum in this study clustered together with several sequences labelled as “Hydnum sp. 8”, and that they formed a distinct lineage close to H. sphaericum within the subg. Hydnum. Hydnum sphaericum, also originally described from China, can be easily distinguished from H. sinorepandum by its smaller basidiocarps (pileus 20–35 mm broad in diam.) with subglobose pileus when young, shorter spines, and the distribution in subtropical regions of central China [2].

4. Discussion

In this study, seven Hydnum species, including three new species (i.e., H. longipes, H. microcarpum, and H. sionrepandum), were confirmed and described on the basis of morphological and molecular analyses in China. Up to now, 25 Hydnum species have been recorded in China, including 15 species originally reported from China [2]. A morphological comparison of Hydnum species in China is given in Table 1, including the main morphological characteristics and ecological information.
Compared with previous morphological results, the number of Hydnum species now recorded in China has increased dramatically. This is mainly due to the overlapping morphological characteristics between Hydnum species (such as the size, shape, and color of the cap, tooth, and stipe); thus, recognition of Hydnum species based solely upon morphology is very difficult or impossible.
In some species, it is noticeable that some morphology characteristics have intraspecific variations after observing and studying more specimens. For instance, the spore size of H. melitosarx from the northern and subtropical alpine areas of China is larger than that from southern China. The reason for this may be that there is more pressure to survive in the southern regions, and the fungi need to mature as quickly as possible to release more spores to maintain the population. In addition, discoloration (context changing from pale yellowish green to bluish green when bruised) was observed in some Japanese H. cremeoalbum samples [24] but not observed in Chinese specimens in the present study. Many Hydnum species will undergo color changes after injury or handling, but this is not a stable characteristic and it is not a wise choice to distinguish Hydnum species based on color change.
Recently, molecular sequences appeared to be very effective in distinguishing species of this genus, and some cryptic species have been discovered. For example, “Hydnum repandum” had been widely reported in China [8,9,10,30]; however, recent phylogenetic studies proved that the Chinese “H. repandum” is a species complex, containing at least four species, such as, H. berkeleyanum, H. melitosarx, H. orientalbidum, and H. sinorepandum. In addition, H. repandum is so far only known from Europe.
In the multilocus phylogenetic tree (Figure 2), the genus Hydnum is an independent monophyletic group, in which four subgenera (subg. Pallidi, subg. Hydnum, subg. Parvispina, and subg. Rufescentes) are highly supported, and the subg. Alba is not monophyletic, which is similar to the results of previous studies [2,23,24]. However, no stable morphological characteristics have been found to distinguish each subgenus. For example, traditionally, subg. Alba is characterized by whitish to cream-colored pileus, a whitish stipe which stains yellowish when handled, and the features also seen in some species of subg. Hydnum, subg. Pallidi and subg. Rufescentes. In addition, the presence of relatively small basidiospores (usually less than 7 mm long) is another characteristic to distinguish subg. Alba from others, while these characteristics are also present in subg. Parvispina.
Most species of Hydnum have restricted distribution areas according to previous studies [5,24,27] and this study. For example, H. subalpinum and H. sinorepandum are only distributed in sub-alpine regions of Asia; H. repandum is only known in Europe [6]; and H. alboaurantiacum, H. cuspidatum, H. ferruginescens, and H. subtilior appeared endemic to North America [25]. Currently, only H. melitosarx has been confirmed with a holarctic distribution, so far known from Andorra, China, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Solenia, Sweden, and the USA. It is worth mentioning that Hydnum species can be found in temperate to subtropical regions in China, but it is very rare in tropical regions.
In recent years, a large number of Hydnum species have been found in Asia, making Asia the continent with the highest species diversity of Hydnum species [2,23,24,26,27], and most known Hydnum species are endemic to Asia. China, as one of the mega-biodiverse countries, has numerous plants that can symbiosis with Hydnum, and it can be predicted that with the deepening of investigations and research, many more Hydnum species will be discovered and reported from this country.
Key to species of Hydnum in China
1. Pileus white, cream white, or pale yellow2
1.Pileus orange, reddish orange, or reddish brown11
2.Basidiocarps medium to large; pileus > 60 mm broad3
2.Basidiocarps small; pileus ≤ 60 mm broad4
3.Distributed in sub-alpine regionsH. sinorepandum
3.Distributed in subtropical regions, elevation < 1000 mH. cremeoalbum
4.Pileus ≤ 25 mm broad5
4.Pileus usually > 25 mm broad7
5.Basidiospores > 5 μm long on average6
5.Basidiospores < 5 μm long on average H. minum
6.Spines 0.5–1.5 mm long, white to yellowish white when fresh, grayish yellow to grayish orange when dryH. microcarpum
6.Spines 0.2–0.8 mm long, pure white when fresh, yellowish white when dryH. brevispinum
7.Basidiospores > 7.5 μm long on average8
7.Basidiospores < 7.5 μm long on average9
8.Distributed in northeastern China; basidiospores av. 9.07 × 7.04 μmH. flabellatum
8.Distributed in southwestern China; basidiospores av. 7.75 × 6.01 μmH. flavidocanum
9.Spines white; basidiospores av. 4.65 × 3.96 μmH. orientalbidum
9.Spines orange-white when fresh10
10.In mixed forests; basidiospores av. 4.72 × 4.02 μmH. pinicola
10.In broad-leaved forests; basidiospores av. 7.08 × 6.09 μmH. tenuistipitum
11.Basidiocarps small; pileus < 20 mm broad, orange-white to greyish orange; basidiospores av. 9.81 × 9.03 μmH. longibasidium
11.Basidiocarps medium to large; pileus ≥ 20 mm broad12
12.Basidiospores > 9 μm long on average13
12.Basidiospores < 9 μm long on average15
13.Holarctic distribution; pileus reddish yellow, light orange to orangeH. melitosarx
13.Only distributed in Asia14
14.Distributed in subalpine regions of southwestern China; pileus orange to reddish orange, changing orange-white when bruised; spines adnate, orange-white to pale orangeH. longipes
14.Distributed in coniferous forests of northwestern China; pileus orange-white to pale orange; spines light yellow when freshH. pallidocroceum
15.Pileus can up to 80 mm broad, pale orange to light orange; spines up to 9 mm long; distributed in temperate regions of AsiaH. berkeleyanum
15.Pileus less than 80 mm broad16
16.Spines decurrent17
16.Spines non-decurrent to subdecurrent18
17.Pileus very pale to medium orange ocher; basidiospores av. 7.5 × 7 μm; distributed in coniferous forestsH. jussii
17.Pileus orange-white to pale orange; basidiospores av. 8.75 × 6.99 μm; distributed in broad-leaved forestsH. pallidomarginatum
18.Distributed in broad-leaved forests in central China19
18.Distributed in mixed forests20
19.Spines white, 0.5–3 mm long; pileus orange-whiteH. sphaericum
19.Spines orange-white, 2–6 mm long; pileus light orange to brownish orangeH. tangerinum
20.Pileus orange to brown; spines orange-white when fresh, up to 5 mm long; basidiospores av. 8.64 × 8.17 μm with Q value = 1.05–1.09H. ventricosum
20.Pileus ocher to light ocher; spines pale ocher, 1–1.7 mm long; basidiospores av. 8.2–8.7 × 6.4–6.8 μm with Q value = 1.27–1.3H. vesterholtii

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Z.; methodology, M.Z.; performing the experiment, M.Z.; formal analysis, M.Z. and C.W.; validation, M.Z., C.W., H.B. and W.D.; resources, M.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Z.; writing—review and editing, M.Z. and C.W.; visualization, M.Z.; supervision, M.Z.; project administration, M.Z.; funding acquisition, M.Z. and W.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program (Grant No. 2022FY100500), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 32070020, 32170010, 32170009), and the 2023 Edible fungi industry Science and Technology mission project in Nanhua County, Yunnan Province.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://nmdc.cn/fungalnames/, and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ (accessed on 8 December 2023).

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to Guorui Zhong, Xiaoqing Huang and Liqiang Wu for their help during field collections. Thanks are given to Qingqing Huang, Qinfang Luo, Yi Yang, Jiaxi Pan and Xiaomei Peng for their providing specimens.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hibbett, D.S.; Bauer, R.; Binder, M.; Giachini, A.J.; Hosaka, K.; Justo, A.; Larsson, E.; Larsson, K.H.; Lawrey, J.D.; Miettinen, O.; et al. Agaricomycetes. In The Mycota Systematics and Evolution, 2nd ed.; VII Part A; McLaughlin, D.J., Spatafora, J.W., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 373–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cao, T.; Hu, Y.P.; Yu, J.R.; Wei, T.Z.; Yuan, H.S. A phylogenetic overview of the Hydnaceae (Cantharellales, Basidiomycota) with new taxa from China. Stud. Mycol. 2021, 99, 100121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. He, X.L.; Peng, W.H.; Wang, D. An Illustration of Important Wild Edible Fungi in Sichuan; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2021; pp. 1–206. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yang, Z.L.; Wang, X.H.; Wu, G. Mushrooms of Yunnan; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2022; pp. 1–378. [Google Scholar]
  5. Feng, B.; Wang, X.H.; Ratkowsky, D.; Gates, G.; Lee, S.S.; Grebenc, T.; Yang, Z.L. Multilocus phylogenetic analyses reveal unexpected abundant diversity and significant disjunct distribution pattern of the hedgehog mushrooms (Hydnum L.). Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Niskanen, T.; Liimatainen, K.; Nuytinck, J.; Kirk, P.; Olariaga, I.; Roberto Garibay-Orijel, I.; Norvell, L.; Huhtinen, S.; Kytövuori, I.; Ruotsalainen, J.; et al. Identifying and naming the currently known diversity of the genus Hydnum, with an emphasis on European and North American taxa. Mycologia 2018, 110, 890–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Moncalvo, J.M.; Nilsson, R.H.; Koster, B.; Dunham, S.M.; Bernauer, T.; Matheny, P.B.; Porter, T.M.; Margaritescu, S.; Weiß, M.; Garnica, S.; et al. The cantharelloid clade: Dealing with incongruent gene trees and phylogenetic reconstruction methods. Mycologia 2006, 98, 937–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ying, J.Z.; Zang, M. Economic Macrofungi from Southwestern China; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1994; pp. 1–398. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zang, M.; Li, B.; Xi, J.; Zhang, D. Fungi of Hengduan Mountains; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  10. Li, Y.; Li, T.H.; Yang, Z.L.; Bau, T.; Dai, Y.C. Atlas of Chinese Macrofungal Resources; Central China Farmer’s Publishing House: Zhengzhou, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, M.; Wang, C.Q.; Buyck, B.; Deng, W.Q.; Li, T.H. Multigene Phylogeny and Morphology Reveal Unexpectedly High Number of New Species of Cantharellus Subgenus Parvocantharellus (Hydnaceae, Cantharellales) in China. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, M.; Wang, C.Q.; Gan, M.S.; Li, Y.; Shao, S.C.; Qin, W.Q.; Deng, W.Q.; Li, T.H. Diversity of Cantharellus (Cantharellales, Basidiomycota) in China with Description of Some New Species and New Records. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kornerup, A.; Wanscher, J.H. Methuen Handbook of Colour; Eyre Methuen: London, UK, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  14. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.D.; Lee, S.B.; Taylor, J.W. Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vilgalys, R.; Hester, M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 4238–4246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Buyck, B.; Kauff, F.; Eyssartier, G.; Couloux, A.; Hofstetter, V. A multilocus phylogeny for worldwide Cantharellus (Cantharellales, Agaricomycetidae). Fungal Divers. 2014, 64, 101–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Katoh, K.; Kuma, K.I.; Toh, H.; Miyata, T. MAFFT version 5: Improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tamura, K.; Peterson, D.; Peterson, N.; Stecher, G.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 2731–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, D.; Gao, F.L.; Li, W.X.; Jakovlić, I.; Zou, H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, G.T. PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2020, 20, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nguyen, L.T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kalyaanamoorthy, S.; Minh, B.Q.; Wong, T.K.F.; von Haeseler, A.; Jermiin, L.S. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 587–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lanfear, R.; Frandsen, P.B.; Wright, A.M.; Senfeld, T.; Calcott, B. PartitionFinder 2: New methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 772–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, J.S.; Lee, W.; Kim, C.; Park, H.; Kim, C.S.; Lim, Y.W. Unveiling the Diversity of Hydnum in the Republic of Korea with One New Species, Hydnum paucispinum. Mycobiology 2023, 51, 300–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sugawara, R.; Maekawa, N.; Sotome, K.; Nakagiri, A.; Endo, N. Systematic revision of Hydnum species in Japan. Mycologia 2022, 114, 413–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Swenie, R.A.; Baroni, T.J.; Matheny, P.B. Six new species and reports of Hydnum (Cantharellales) from eastern North America. MycoKeys 2018, 72, 35–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yanaga, K.; Sotome, K.; Ushijima, S.; Maekawa, N. Hydnum species producing whitish basidiomata in Japan. Mycoscience 2015, 56, 434–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sugawara, R.; Aoki, W.; Yamada, A.; Nakagiri, A.; Endo, N. Ecological speciation of Japanese hedgehog mushroom: Hydnum subalpinum sp. nov. is distinguished from its sister species H. repando-orientale by means of integrative taxonomy. Mycol Progress 2022, 21, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, X.H.; Das, K.; Horman, J.; Antonin, V.; Baghela, A.; Chakraborty, D.; Hembrom, M.E.; Nakasone, K.; Ortiz-Santana, B.; Vizzini, A.; et al. Fungal Biodiversity Profiles 51–60. Cryptogam. Mycol. 2018, 39, 211–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Olariaga, I.; Grebenc, T.; Salcedo, I.; Martín, M.P. Two new species of Hydnum with ovoid basidiospores: H. ovoideisporum and H. vesterholtii. Mycologia 2012, 104, 1443–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mao, X.L. The Macrofungi in China; Henan Science and Technology Press: Zhengzhou, China, 2000; pp. 1–719. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Hydnum inferred from the ITS dataset. Bootstrap values (>70%) are shown above or below supported branches. Specimens from the present study are indicated in bold.
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Hydnum inferred from the ITS dataset. Bootstrap values (>70%) are shown above or below supported branches. Specimens from the present study are indicated in bold.
Jof 10 00098 g001aJof 10 00098 g001b
Figure 2. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Hydnum inferred from the ITS-LSU-tef1 dataset. Bootstrap values (>70%) are shown above or below supported branches. Specimens from this study are indicated in bold.
Figure 2. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Hydnum inferred from the ITS-LSU-tef1 dataset. Bootstrap values (>70%) are shown above or below supported branches. Specimens from this study are indicated in bold.
Jof 10 00098 g002aJof 10 00098 g002bJof 10 00098 g002c
Figure 3. Fresh basidiocarps of Hydnum species. (a) H. cremeoalbum (GDGM87013). (b) H. longipes (GDGM82458, Type). (c) H. melitosarxm (GDGM81866). (d) H. orientalbidum (GDGM93019). (e) H. pinicola (GDGM83047). (f) H. microcarpum (GDGM87902, Type). (g,h) H. sinorepandum (g). GDGM82445, Type; (h). GDGM82382). Bars: (ah) = 50 mm.
Figure 3. Fresh basidiocarps of Hydnum species. (a) H. cremeoalbum (GDGM87013). (b) H. longipes (GDGM82458, Type). (c) H. melitosarxm (GDGM81866). (d) H. orientalbidum (GDGM93019). (e) H. pinicola (GDGM83047). (f) H. microcarpum (GDGM87902, Type). (g,h) H. sinorepandum (g). GDGM82445, Type; (h). GDGM82382). Bars: (ah) = 50 mm.
Jof 10 00098 g003
Figure 4. Microscopic features of Hydnum cremeoalbum (GDGM87013). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia and basidioles. (c) Pileipellis terminal hyphae with clamp connections. Bars: (ac) = 10 μm.
Figure 4. Microscopic features of Hydnum cremeoalbum (GDGM87013). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia and basidioles. (c) Pileipellis terminal hyphae with clamp connections. Bars: (ac) = 10 μm.
Jof 10 00098 g004
Figure 5. Microscopic features of Hydnum longipes (GDGM82458, Holotype). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia and basidioles usually covered with a yellowish granular substance. (c) Pileipellis terminal hyphae with clamp connections. Bars: (ac) = 10 μm.
Figure 5. Microscopic features of Hydnum longipes (GDGM82458, Holotype). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia and basidioles usually covered with a yellowish granular substance. (c) Pileipellis terminal hyphae with clamp connections. Bars: (ac) = 10 μm.
Jof 10 00098 g005
Figure 6. Microscopic features of Hydnum melitosarx (GDGM84518). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia and basidioles. (c) Pileipellis terminal hyphae with clamp connections. Bars: (ac) = 10 μm.
Figure 6. Microscopic features of Hydnum melitosarx (GDGM84518). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia and basidioles. (c) Pileipellis terminal hyphae with clamp connections. Bars: (ac) = 10 μm.
Jof 10 00098 g006
Figure 7. Microscopic features of Hydnum microcarpum (GDGM87902). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia and basidioles usually covered with a yellowish granular substance. (c) Pileipellis terminal hyphae with clamp connections. Bars: (ac) = 10 μm.
Figure 7. Microscopic features of Hydnum microcarpum (GDGM87902). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia and basidioles usually covered with a yellowish granular substance. (c) Pileipellis terminal hyphae with clamp connections. Bars: (ac) = 10 μm.
Jof 10 00098 g007
Figure 8. Microscopic features of Hydnum orientalbidum (GDGM93019). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia and basidioles. (c) Pileipellis terminal hyphae with clamp connections. Bars: (ac) = 10 μm.
Figure 8. Microscopic features of Hydnum orientalbidum (GDGM93019). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia and basidioles. (c) Pileipellis terminal hyphae with clamp connections. Bars: (ac) = 10 μm.
Jof 10 00098 g008
Figure 9. Microscopic features of Hydnum pinicola (GDGM93020). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia and basidioles sometimes covered with a yellowish granular substance. (c) Pileipellis terminal hyphae with clamp connections. Bars: (ac) = 10 μm.
Figure 9. Microscopic features of Hydnum pinicola (GDGM93020). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia and basidioles sometimes covered with a yellowish granular substance. (c) Pileipellis terminal hyphae with clamp connections. Bars: (ac) = 10 μm.
Jof 10 00098 g009
Figure 10. Microscopic features of Hydnum sinorepandum (GDGM82445). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia and basidioles usually covered with a yellowish granular substance. (c) Pileipellis terminal hyphae with clamp connections. (d) Stipitipellis. Bars: (ad) = 10 μm.
Figure 10. Microscopic features of Hydnum sinorepandum (GDGM82445). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia and basidioles usually covered with a yellowish granular substance. (c) Pileipellis terminal hyphae with clamp connections. (d) Stipitipellis. Bars: (ad) = 10 μm.
Jof 10 00098 g010
Table 1. A morphological comparison of Hydnum species in China.
Table 1. A morphological comparison of Hydnum species in China.
SpeciesPileusSpinesSpores SizeHabit and DistributionReferences
H. berkeleyanum25–80 mm wide; pale orange to light orange with a brown center, pale orange to light orange toward margin.Spines adnexed to subdecurrent; initially white (A1), becoming orange-white to pale orange at maturity; 2–9 mm long.7.5–8.4–8.5–9.5 × 6.9–7.9–8–8.8 µm; Q = 1.01–1.17In temperate mixed forest; Known from India and China[4,28]
H. brevispinum10–15 mm wide; pure white to yellowish white, yellowish white to greyish orange when dry.Spines non-decurrent to subdecurrent; pure white when fresh, yellowish white when dry; 0.2–0.8 mm long.(4.5)5–5.8(6) × (3.5)3.8–4.8(5) μm, av. 5.28 × 4.16 μm, Q = 1.27–1.31In angiosperm forests; distributed in Hunan Province.[2]
H. cremeoalbum30–100 mm wide; white to cream white.Spines adnate, non-decurrent; yellowish white, orange-white to pale orange; 2–5 mm long.4–5.5 × 3.5–4.5 μm, av. 4.73 × 3.88 μm, Q = 1.1–1.42.In broad-leaved or mixed forests; known from southern China and Japan.[27]
Present study
H. flabellatum30–45 mm wide; yellowish white, pale yellow to greyish yellow, often with brownish orange scales. Spines non-decurrent or subdecurrent; orange-white when fresh, greyish orange when dry; 0.6–2 mm long.(7.8)8.5–9.5(10) × (6)6.5–7.8(8) μm, av. 9.07 × 7.04 μm, Q = 1.26–1.29In mixed forests; distributed in Liaoning Province.[2]
H. flavidocanum20–30 mm wide; yellowish white or yellowish gray at center, whitish towards margin.Spines non-decurrent or subdecurrent; orange-white when fresh, greyish orange when dry; 0.5–2 mm long,(7)7.2–8.8(8.9) × (5.2) 5.5–6.5(6.8) μm, av. 7.75 × 6.01 μm, Q = 1.29–1.31In mixed forests; distributed in Yunnan Province.[2]
H. jussii35–60 mm wide; very pale to medium orange ocher.Spines somewhat decurrent; whitish to very pale ochraceous, later pale brownish ochraceous. 7.2–8 × 6.6–7.5 μm, av. 7.5 × 7 μm, Q = 1.03–1.18In coniferous forests. Known from Finland and China. [3,6]
H. longibasidium10–15 mm wide; orange-white to greyish orange when fresh, greyish orange to brownish yellow when dry.Spines non-decurrent or subdecurrent; orange-white to pale orange when fresh, greyish orange to brownish yellow when dry; 1–4 mm long.(8)8.5–11(11.5) × (7.5)7.8–9.8(10) μm, av. 9.81 × 9.03 μm, Q = 1.09–1.13In angiosperm forests; distributed in Hunan Province.[2]
H. longipes20–30 mm wide; orange, light orange, pastel red to reddish orange, changing to orange-white when bruised.Spines adnate, non-decurrent; orange-white to pale orange; 1–3 mm long.(7.5)8–10(10.5) × (6)7–8.5(9) μm, av. 9.32 × 7.63 μm, Q = 1.05–1.43In Quercus aquifolioides and Pinus densata dominated forests; distributed in Yunnan ProvincePresent study
H. melitosarx20–40 mm wide, reddish yellow, light yellow, light orange to orange.Spines adnate; white, yellowish white to pale orange; 2–5 mm long.8–11× 7–10 μm, av. 9.37 × 8.71 μm, Q = 1–1.28In broad-leaved or mixed forests. Known from Asia, Europe, and North America.[6]
Present study
H. microcarpum10–20 mm wide; white, yellowish white to orange-white, changing from brownish orange to brownish red when bruised.Spines adnate to subdecurrent; white to yellowish white when fresh, grayish yellow to grayish orange when dry; 0.5–1.5 mm long.5–6(6.5) × 5–5.5(6) μm, av. 5.78 × 5.26 μm, Q = 1–1.2In mixed forests dominated; distributed in Guangdong ProvincePresent study
H. minum10–25 mm wide; whitish, cream yellow to pale buff, changing reddish brown when bruised.Spines adnate, non-decurrent; whitish, cream yellow to pale buff;
0.5–1.7 mm long.
4.5–5.5 × 3–4.5 μm, av. 4.8 × 3.8 μm, Q = 1.1–1.5In mixed forest; Known from Japan and China.[2,26]
H. orientalbidum30–60 mm wide; white.Spines adnate; white; 2–3 mm long.4–5 × 3.5–4.5 μm, av. 4.65 × 3.96 μm, Q = 1.1–1.28In broad-leaved forests. Known from China and Japan.Present study
H. pallidocroceum25–40 mm wide; orange-white to pale orange. Spines non-decurrent; light yellow when fresh, orange-white to pale orange when dry; 1–5 mm long,(7.5) 7.8–9.5(10) × (5.5)6–7.5(8) μm, av. 9.09 × 6.72 μm, Q = 1.32–1.35In Pinus sp. and Picea sp. forests; distributed in Xinjiang Province.[2]
H. pallidomarginatum20–35 mm wide; orange-white to pale orange, with a light color zone towards center.Spines decurrent; orange-white to pale orange when fresh, brownish orange when dry; 0.5–2 mm long,(8) 8.2–9.8(10) × (6)6.5–7.8(8.2) μm, av. 8.75 × 6.99 μm, Q = 1.25–1.28 In angiosperm forests; distributed in Yunnan Province.[2]
H. pinicola25–60 mm wide; yellowish white, pale yellow to pale orange.Spines adnate; orange-white, pale orange when fresh, pinkish white to pale red when dry; 1.5–3 mm long.4–6 × 3.5–5 μm, av. 4.72 × 4.02 μm, Q = 1–1.25In mixed forests; known from China and Japan. [24]
Present study
H. sinorepandum40–120 mm wide; yellowish white, pale yellow, light yellow to light orange.Spines adnate; white, yellowish white, pale yellow to pale orange; 3–7 mm long.(7.5)8–9(10) × 6.5–7.5 μm, av. 8.16 × 7.12 μm, Q = 1–1.38In broad-leaved and mixed forests; distributed in Yunnan Province.Present study
H. sphaericum20–35 mm wide; orange-white when moist, greyish orange to brownish orange when dry. Spines non-decurrent to subdecurrent; white when fresh, brownish orange when dry; 0.5–3 mm long,(7.5)8–8.8(9) × (6)6.5–7.5(8) μm, av. 8.36 × 6.94 μm, Q = 1.2–1.23In angiosperm forest; distributed in Hunan Province.[2]
H. tangerinum10–50 mm wide; pale orange, light orange, orange to brownish orange when moist, greyish orange when dry.Spines non-decurrent; orange-white when fresh, greyish orange when dry; 2–6 mm long.(7)7.2–8.8(9) × (5.5)
5.8–7(7.5) μm, av. 8.11 × 6.19 μm, Q = 1.23–1.31
In angiosperm forest; distributed in Hunan Province[2]
H. tenuistipitum10–30 mm wide; yellow white to orange-white when moist, pale orange to greyish orange when dry.Spines non-decurrent to subdecurrent; orange-white when fresh, light brown when dry; 1–3 mm long.(6.5)6.8–7.2(7.5) × (5.2)5.5–6.5(6.8) μm, av. 7.08 × 6.09 μm, Q = 1.07–1.16In angiosperm forest; distributed in Hunan Province.[2]
H. ventricosum28–35 mm wide; orange to brown.Spines non-decurrent; orange-white when fresh, brownish orange when dry; 1–5 mm long.(7.5)8.2–9(9.5) × (7)7.5–8.5(9) μm, av. 8.64 × 8.17 μm, Q = 1.05–1.09In mixed forests; distributed in Liaoning Province.[2]
H. vesterholtii10–30(–50) mm wide, ocher to light ocher.Spines non-decurrent to slightly decurrent; pale ocher; 1–1.7 mm long.(7)8–9(9.5) × 6–7.5(8) μm, av. 8.2–8.7 × 6.4–6.8 μm; Q = 1.27–1.3;In Abies alba and Fagus sylvatica forest.
Known from China and France.
[3,29]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, M.; Wang, C.; Bai, H.; Deng, W. A Contribution to the Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Hydnum (Cantharellales, Basidiomycota) from China. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10020098

AMA Style

Zhang M, Wang C, Bai H, Deng W. A Contribution to the Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Hydnum (Cantharellales, Basidiomycota) from China. Journal of Fungi. 2024; 10(2):98. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10020098

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Ming, Chaoqun Wang, Hongfen Bai, and Wangqiu Deng. 2024. "A Contribution to the Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Hydnum (Cantharellales, Basidiomycota) from China" Journal of Fungi 10, no. 2: 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10020098

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop