Next Article in Journal
Sporothrix brasiliensis Infection Modulates Antimicrobial Peptides and Stress Management Gene Expression in the Invertebrate Biomodel Galleria mellonella
Next Article in Special Issue
Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Updates on Apiospora: Introducing Four New Species from Wurfbainia villosa and Grasses in China
Previous Article in Journal
Dendritic Cells: Multifunctional Roles in Host Defenses to Cryptococcus Infections
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spectrometric Characterization of Clinical and Environmental Isolates of Aspergillus Series Versicolores
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morpho-Phylogenetic Evidence Reveals Novel Species and New Records of Botryosphaeriaceae in China and Thailand

1
School of Life Science and Technology, Center for Informational Biology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
2
Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand
3
School of Pharmacy, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang 550025, China
4
Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(11), 1051; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9111051
Submission received: 29 August 2023 / Revised: 23 October 2023 / Accepted: 24 October 2023 / Published: 26 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Taxonomy, Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi)

Abstract

:
Species in the Botryosphaeriaceae are common plant pathogens, endophytes, and saprobes found on a variety of mainly woody hosts. Botryosphaeriaceae is a high-profile fungal family whose genera have been subjected to continuous revisions in recent years. Surveys conducted during 2019 and 2020 on several decaying woody hosts (from dead arial twigs, branches, stems, bark, and seed pods) in China and Thailand revealed a high diversity of Botryosphaeriaceae fungi. Identification of 16 Botryosphaeriaceae isolates was carried out based on both morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analyses of combined ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 sequence data. Four novel species (Dothiorella ovata, Do. rosacearum, Do. septata, and Lasiodiplodia delonicis) and seven previously known species (Botryosphaeria fujianensis, Diplodia mutila, Di. seriata, L. crassispora, L. mahajangana, Macrophomina euphorbiicola and Sphaeropsis eucalypticola) were identified while new hosts and geographical records were reported. This study indicates that the fungal family Botryosphaeriaceae seems to be common and widespread on a broad range of hosts in China and Thailand.

1. Introduction

The order Botryosphaeriales (Dothideomycetes) was established by Schoch et al. [1], including a single family Botryosphaeriaceae. A recent comprehensive study by Phillips et al. [2] accepted six families, viz. Aplosporellaceae, Botryosphaeriaceae, Melanopsaceae, Phyllostictaceae, Planistromellaceae, and Saccharataceae are in this order based on morphological and phylogenetic analysis. Members of Botryosphaeriales have worldwide distribution on many different host plants [3,4,5,6,7,8] and occur as endophytes, pathogens, and saprobes. As opportunistic pathogens, they are of considerable importance to agriculture, horticulture, and forestry [9,10] while causing severe diseases of economically important crops and plants, leading to huge economic losses [11,12].
The family Botryosphaeriaceae was established by Theissen and Sydow [13] to accommodate three genera, Botryosphaeria, Dibotryon, and Phaeobotryon, with Botryosphaeria as the type genus [1]. Subsequently, Kirk et al. [14] estimated 26 genera within the family Botryosphaeriaceae, while Liu et al. [4] reevaluated the family and recognized 29 genera. Up to date, 22 genera with more than 200 species are accepted within the family, based on morphology and molecular evidence [2,15,16,17,18].
During an investigation of Botryosphaeriaceae diversity in China and Thailand, a collection of 16 Botryosphaeriaceae-like isolates was obtained from several arial parts of the decaying woody hosts. A multi-gene phylogeny based on combined ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2, coupled with morphological comparisons, was carried out to confirm the taxonomic placement. Additionally, this study extended the taxonomic framework of Botryosphaeriaceae by discovering new species, new host records, and new geographical records in China and Thailand.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Specimen Collection, Examination, and Single Spore Isolation

Samples of decaying woody plants were collected from Chiang Rai and Chiang Mai Provinces in Thailand and from Sichuan Province in China between June 2019 and November 2020. Samples were brought to the laboratory by placing them in brown craft paper bags, and the sampling information (date, host, place, GPS, etc.) was recorded.
Morphological observations of fungal structures were made using a LEICA EZ4 dissecting microscope following the method described in Chomnunti et al. [19]. The fungal structures were transferred to a small drop of double distilled water on a clean slide and covered with a glass coverslip. Photomicrographs of the fungal specimens were captured using a Nikon ECLIPSE Ni compound microscope fitted with a Nikon DS-Ri2 digital camera. Macro-morphological structures were photographed with a Discovery V.8 stereo microscope fitted with a CARL ZEISS Axio Cam ERc5S microscope camera. All measurements were made with the Tarosoft (R) Image Frame Work (IFW) program [20], and the images were processed with Adobe Photoshop CC extended version 21.1.2.
Single spore isolations were carried out as described by Chomnunti et al. [19], and fruiting body contents were transferred to a drop of sterile water on a sterilized spot plate. This spore suspension was spread over the Petri dishes containing potato dextrose agar (PDA) and incubated at 25 °C for 12 to 24 h. Germinated spores were transferred onto fresh PDA media plates. These culture plates were incubated at 25 °C in incubators, and colony characteristics were observed and recorded after one week following the method described in Rayner [21]. A total of 56 isolates have been obtained, among which 16 isolates belong to Botryosphaeriaceae. In this study, we focus only on the fungal taxa of Botryosphaeriaceae. To induce sporulation, cultures were transferred onto fresh PDA media plates using sterile toothpicks or pine needles. The induction results were observed after incubating under near-ultraviolet light for 14–30 d at 25 °C.
Herbarium specimens were deposited in the herbarium of Mae Fah Luang University (MFLU), Chiang Rai, Thailand, and Guizhou Academic of Agriculture Sciences (GZAAS), China. Axenic cultures were deposited in Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection (MFLUCC) and Guizhou Culture Collection (GZCC). In deciding whether we have new species, we followed the papers of Chethana et al. [22] and Pem et al. [23]. The descriptions are added to the GMS database [24].

2.2. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification and Sequencing

In a sterile environment, fungal mycelium (about 50–100 mg) was scraped using a sterilized toothpick from the colonies grown on PDA media at 25 °C for 2 weeks and then transferred to sterilized 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes and maintained at −20 °C for long term storage. Ezup Column Fungi Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) was used to extract DNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The amplifications were performed in a 25 μL reaction volume containing 8.5 μL ddH2O, 12.5 μL 2 × PCR Master Mix (Green) (TsingKe Co., Beijing, China), 2 μL of DNA template, and 1 μL of each primer. The genes, primers, and amplification conditions used in this study are listed in Table 1. The PCR products were analyzed by 1.2% agarose gels containing the Safeview DNA stain and sent to Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China) for sequencing.

2.3. Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analysis

Sequences generated in this study were checked and assembled using BioEdit v.7.0.9 [29] to assure the sequence quality. The closest taxa to the strains obtained in this study were determined with standard nucleotide BLAST searches in NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 20 July 2022). According to the BLAST results and previous literature, appropriate sequences were determined and downloaded from GenBank to construct phylogenetic analysis. Two phylogenetic trees were constructed, one for the whole family Botryosphaeriaceae (Figure 1) and the other for the genus Dothiorella (Figure 2). Details of the isolates used in this study are listed in Table 2, where two strains of Pseudofusicoccum adansoniae (CBS 122055, CBS 122056) and Neofusicoccum parvum (CBS 110301, CMW 9081) were selected as the outgroup taxa for Botryosphaeriaceae analyses and Dothiorella analysis respectively. The sequences were aligned using MAFFT v.7 online (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/, accessed on 1 August 2023) and AliView [30], and the results were checked using BioEdit [29] and manually edited where necessary. The concatenation of different genes was conducted using SequenceMatrix 1.8 [31]. The NEXUS and Phylip files for phylogenetic analyses were obtained using AliView [30]. Phylogenetic analyses of the combined sequence data were performed using maximum likelihood (ML), maximum parsimony (MP), and Bayesian inference (BI) methods, as detailed in Dissanayake et al. [32]. The best model of evolution was determined using MrModeltest v2 [33]. The ML analysis was accomplished using RAxML GUI v. 1.3.1 [34], the MP analysis was performed using PAUP v.4.0b10 [35], and the BI analysis was conducted in MrBayes v 3.2.6 [36]. Phylogenetic trees were visualized with FigTree v.1.4.0 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/, accessed on 11 August 2023) and further edited in Adobe Illustrator 2020 (Adobe Systems Inc., Lehi, UT, USA). The final alignment was submitted to Figshare (https://figshare.com, at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24187500, accessed on 22 September 2023).

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenetic Analysis

The combined ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 sequence dataset of Botryosphaeriaceae analysis comprises 89 taxa, including two outgroup taxa. The aligned dataset comprised 2241 characters (ITS: 1–540; LSU: 541–1394; tef1-α: 1395–1793; tub2: 1794–2241) including gaps. The maximum parsimonious dataset consisted of 2241 variable characters, of which 1470 were constant, 655 were parsimony-informative, and 115 were parsimony-uninformative. The MP analysis resulted in a tree length of 2775 steps [consistency index (CI) = 0.444, retention index (RI) = 0.843, relative consistency index (RC) = 0.374, homoplasy index (HI) = 0.556]. The RAxML analysis of the combined data set yielded a best-scoring tree (Figure 1) with a final ML optimization likelihood value of −17,381.405163. The matrix had 1017 distinct alignment patterns, with 25.04% of undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were: A = 0.218861, C = 0.278646, G = 0.277782, T = 0.224710; substitution rates AC = 1.166395, AG = 2.628375, AT = 1.104924, CG = 1.478465, CT = 4.949967, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter (alpha) = 0.207919. The maximum likelihood (ML), maximum parsimony (MP), and Bayesian methods (BI) for phylogenetic analyses resulted in trees with similar topologies. According to the results of phylogenetic analysis, 16 isolates obtained in this study were grouped into 11 clades and located in the genera Botryosphaeria, Diplodia, Dothiorella, Lasiodiplodia, Macrophomina and Sphaeropsis (Figure 1).
The phylogenetic analysis for the genus Dothiorella was carried out, and a phylogenetic tree combining ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 sequence data was also constructed (Figure 2). This dataset included 53 ingroup taxa and two outgroup taxa. The aligned dataset comprised 2062 characters (ITS: 1–514; LSU: 515–1331; tef1-α: 1332–1630; tub2: 1631–2062) including gaps. The maximum parsimonious dataset consisted of 2066 variable characters, of which 1637 were constant, 328 were parsimony-informative, and 101 were parsimony-uninformative. The MP analysis resulted in a tree length of 1223 steps [consistency index (CI) = 0.517, retention index (RI) = 0.760, relative consistency index (RC) = 0.393, homoplasy index (HI) = 0.483]. In the ML analyses, the best-scoring RAxML tree with a final likelihood value of −9705.573604 is presented. The matrix had 606 distinct alignment patterns, with 25.62% of undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were: A = 0.215885, C = 0.284638, G = 0.269261, T = 0.230216; substitution rates AC = 1.152119, AG = 2.141304, AT = 1.169569, CG = 1.149449, CT = 5.009593, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter (alpha) = 0.143638. The maximum likelihood (ML), maximum parsimony (MP), and Bayesian methods (BI) for phylogenetic analyses resulted in trees with similar topologies, and the result of ML analysis is shown in Figure 2. Phylogenetic results showed that the isolates obtained in this study were nested within the genus Dothiorella and grouped into three clades as distinct species.

3.2. Taxonomy

Botryosphaeria fujianensis Z.P. Dou, W. He & Y. Zhang, Mycosystema 40: 482 [37] Figure 3.
Index Fungorum number: IF826938.
Saprobic on twigs of Tectona grandis L.F. Sexual morph: Ascomata 140–216 × 178–278 μm ( x ¯ = 182 × 211 μm, n = 20), well-developed, bursting through the bark, generally emerged from the host surface, scattered or gregarious, black, subglobose to obpyriform. Peridium 16–56 μm wide, composed of five strata; an outer stratum has black, thick-walled cells, and the middle and inner layers have black, thin-walled cells. Hamathecium comprising up to 3–5 μm wide, dense, cellular pseudoparaphyses, anastomosing above and between the asci. Asci 76–125 × 20–33 μm (n = 20), bitunicate, eight-spored, broadly clavate, apically rounded and with a visible ocular chamber. Ascospores 20–27 × 7–11 μm ( x ¯ = 24 × 10 μm, n = 50), initially rhomboid, hyaline, aseptate, elliptical to ovoid, thick-walled, smooth at maturity, apiculus at either end. Asexual morph: Not observed.
Culture characteristics: Ascospores germinating on PDA within 12 h. Colonies are fast growing on PDA, reaching 60 mm diam. after 7 d at 20–25 °C. Circular, white in first few days, becoming pale grey from the center after two weeks, and finally black after three weeks, felt-like, flattened, surface smooth.
Material examined: Thailand, Chiang Mai Province, Amphoe Mae Taeng, Tambon Pa Pae, 19°06′32.6″ N, 98°44′21.1″ E, on dead twigs of Tectona grandis (Lamiaceae), 8 August 2019, Na Wu, YW246 (MFLU 23-0012), living culture MFLUCC 23-0041.
Notes: The phylogenetic results (Figure 1) showed that our newly obtained isolate clustered together with Botryosphaeria fujianensis, and we identified it as B. fujianensis. There was only the asexual morph provided when Chu et al. [37] described this species, and we illustrate the sexual morph of B. fujianensis and reported it as the new record from Thailand in this study.
Diplodia mutila Fries in Montagne, Ann. Sci. nat., sér. 21: 302 [38] Figure 4.
Index Fungorum number: IF201741; Facesoffungi number: FoF00147.
Saprobic on dead twigs of Prunus persica L. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: Conidiomata 213–306 × 247–313 μm ( x ¯ = 266 × 282 μm, n = 20), semi-immersed or immersed in the substrate, dark brown to black, solitary, globose to ovoid, centrally ostiolate. Ostiole 28–45 μm diam., centrally located, short papillate. Peridium up to 53–78 μm wide, 5–7 layers, consisting of brown and small-celled textura angularis. Conidiophores are reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 8–14 × 3–7 μm ( x ¯ = 9 × 4 μm, n = 20), hyaline, cylindrical, discrete, smooth-walled, slightly swollen at the base, forming a single conidium at the tip. Conidia 23–29 × 12–15 μm ( x ¯ = 27 × 14 μm, n = 50), hyaline, aseptate, externally smooth, internally verruculose, thick-walled, oblong to ovoid, straight, both ends broadly rounded.
Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 24 h. Colonies are fast growing at 20–25 °C, becoming ash-grey on the surface after 7 days and finally black after two weeks, felt-like, dense, convex with the papillate surface, aerial.
Material examined: China, Sichuan Province, Chengdu City, High Tech West Zone, Xi Yuan Avenue, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China campus, 30°45’9″ N, 103°55’31″ E, on dead twigs of Prunus persica L., 22 November 2020, H.Z. Du, YW290 (GZAAS 23-0582), living culture GZCC 23-0578.
Notes: We identified our isolate as Diplodia mutila based on morphology and phylogeny. This is the first record of Di. mutila found on Prunus persica in China.
Diplodia seriata De Not., Mém. R. Accad. Sci. Torino, Ser. 27: 26 [39] Figure 5.
Index Fungorum number: IF180468.
Saprobic on dead twigs of Wisteria sinensis L. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: Conidiomata 138–245 × 206–240 μm ( x ¯ = 175 × 228 μm, n = 20), semi-immersed or immersed in the substrate, dark brown to black, solitary, pyriform, initially intraepidermal, visible as black dots on the host when mature, thick-walled, glabrous, centrally ostiolate. Ostiole 16–30 μm diam., centrally located, short papillate. Peridium up to 12–30 μm wide, 3–5 layers, consisting of brown and small-celled textura angularis, becoming hyaline towards the inner region. Conidiophores are reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 6–13 × 3–5 μm ( x ¯ = 8 × 4 μm, n = 20), hyaline, cylindrical, discrete, smooth-walled, slightly swollen at the base, forming a single conidium at the tip. Conidia 18–27 × 9–13 μm ( x ¯ = 22 × 11 μm, n = 50), brown, aseptate, externally smooth, internally verruculose, subcylindrical to ellipsoid, moderately thick-walled, ends rounded, often with a truncate base.
Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 24 h. Colonies are fast growing at 20–25 °C, becoming ash-grey on the surface after 7 days, and finally black after two weeks, velvety and floccose, dense, convex with papillate surface, aerial.
Material examined: China, Sichuan Province, Chengdu City, High Tech West Zone, Xi Yuan Avenue, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China campus, 30°45’9″ N, 103°55’31″ E, on dead twigs of Wisteria sinensis L., 22 November 2020, H.Z. Du, YW297 (GZAAS 23-0583), living culture GZCC 23-0579.
Notes: The sexual morph of Diplodia seriata is linked to Botryosphaeria obtusa Shoemaker [40]. We identified our isolate as Di. seriata based on morphology and phylogeny. This is the first record of Di. seriata found on Wisteria sinensis in China.
Dothiorella ovata N. Wu, A.J. Dissanayake & Jian K. Liu sp. nov. Figure 6.
Index Fungorum number: IF900578; Facesoffungi number: FoF14258.
Etymology: In reference to the ovoid conidia.
Holotype: MFLU 23-0009.
Saprobic on a dead wood. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: Conidiomata 119–173 × 160–273 μm ( x ¯ = 141 × 204 μm, n = 20), semi-immersed or immersed in the substrate, emerging through the epidermis when mature, globose to subglobose, pyriform, dark brown, unilocular, solitary, glabrous, ostiolate. Ostiole 22–26 μm diam., single, circular, papillate, centrally located. Peridium up to 16–38 μm wide, comprising host and fungal tissues, thick-walled, dark brown to hyaline cells of textura angularis. Paraphyses absent. Conidiophores are reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 4–11 × 3–4 μm ( x ¯ = 7 × 4 μm, n = 20), hyaline, phialidic, cylindrical, straight or curved, smooth-walled. Conidia 20–26 × 9–11 μm ( x ¯ = 22 × 10 μm, n = 50), hyaline, aseptate, ovoid, rounded at both ends or sometimes with truncate bases, becoming pigmented brown and one septate at maturation, constricted in the middle, smooth-walled, without longitudinal striations or mucilaginous sheath.
Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 12 h. Colonies are fast growing on PDA, reaching 90 mm diam. after 5–6 days at 20–23 °C. Sparse, aerial, filamentous, white in first few days, after 2 weeks, becoming black.
Material examined: Thailand, Chiang Mai Province, Amphoe Mae Taeng, Tambon Cho Lae, 19°08’01.3″ N, 99°00’29.4″ E, on an unidentified dead wood, 6 August 2019, Na Wu, YW177 (MFLU 23-0009, holotype); ex-type living culture MFLUCC 23-0035; ibid., 7 August 2019, Na Wu, YW231 (MFLU 23-0010, paratype), living culture MFLUCC 23-0036.
Notes: Dothiorella ovata is nested in between Do. albiziae, Do. septata and Do. thailandica but can be recognized as a distinct lineage (Figure 2). Morphologically, Do. ovata is similar to Do. septata and Do. albiziae, which in having oblong to ovoid, hyaline conidia becoming brown and one septate at maturation. However, Do. ovata differs from Do. septata and Do. albiziae by its slightly constricted septum and the larger conidia. In addition, a comparison of tef1-α sequences data of Do. ovata and Do. albiziae showed that there are 14 bp (base pair) differences (of 252 bp including the gaps), while Do. ovata and Do. thailandica showed 18 bp differences (of 302 bp including the gaps). Therefore, we introduce Do. ovata as a new species.
Dothiorella rosacearum N. Wu, A.J. Dissanayake & Jian K. Liu, sp. nov. Figure 7.
Index Fungorum number: IF900579; Facesoffungi number: FoF14259.
Etymology: Referring to the host family Rosaceae on which the type specimen was collected.
Holotype: MFLU 23-0014.
Saprobic on dead twigs of Amygdalus sp. (Rosaceae). Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: Conidiomata 153–234 × 222–336 μm ( x ¯ = 187 × 270 μm, n = 20), immersed, scattered, dark brown to black, globose or subglobose, solitary, initially intraepidermal, visible as black dots on the host when mature, thick-walled, glabrous. Ostiole 30–32 μm diam., single, straight, sometimes bent, centrally located. Peridium up to 31–45 μm wide, comprising host and fungal tissues, dark brown to black, 5–10 cell layers of textura angularis, becoming thin-walled and hyaline towards the inner region. Paraphyses absent. Conidiophores are reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 4–9 × 3–5 μm ( x ¯ = 7 × 4 μm, n = 20), hyaline, aseptate, contents granular, cylindrical to ellipsoidal, smooth-walled, unbranched or occasionally branched, with swollen bases. Conidia 17–21 × 7–10 μm ( x ¯ = 18 × 8 μm, n = 50), hyaline, aseptate, contents granular, smooth, thin-walled, oval, straight, rounded at the apex, or sometimes with truncate bases, becoming brown and septate when aged, without longitudinal striations or mucilaginous sheath.
Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 12 h. Colonies are fast growing on PDA, reaching 90 mm diam. after 5–6 days at 20–23 °C. Sparse, aerial, filamentous, becoming dark brown to black after 2 weeks.
Material examined: Thailand, Chiang Mai Province, Amphoe Mae Taeng, Tambon Pa Pae, 19°06’32.6″ N, 98°44’21.1″ E, on dead twigs of Amygdalus sp. (Rosaceae), 8 August 2019, Na Wu, YW255 (MFLU 23-0014, holotype); ex-type living culture MFLUCC 23-0038; ibid., on an unidentified decaying wood, 7 August 2019, Na Wu, YW253 (MFLU 23-0013, paratype), living culture MFLUCC 23-0037.
Notes: The phylogenetic result (Figure 2) showed that two isolates of Dothiorella rosacearum constitute a distinct lineage but claded closer to Do. brevicollis, Do. diospyricola, Do. lampangensis, Do. longicollis, Do. obovata and Do. tectonae. A comparison of ITS sequences data between Do. rosacearum and Do. tectonae showed that there are 19 bp of 539 base pairs differences (including the gaps). In addition, the shortly raised irregular striations can be found on the conidia of Do. tectonae, while no striations were observed in Do. rosacearum. Therefore, Do. rosacearum is a morphologically and phylogenetically distinct species and herein introduced as a new species.
Dothiorella septata N. Wu, A.J. Dissanayake & Jian K. Liu, sp. nov. Figure 8.
Index Fungorum number: IF900580; Facesoffungi number: FoF14260.
Etymology: The epithet “septata” refers to the septum observed in mature conidia.
Holotype: MFLU 23-0007.
Saprobic on an unidentified dead wood. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: Conidiomata 114–139 × 150–198 μm ( x ¯ = 126 × 172 μm, n = 20), pyriform or subglobose, immersing through the host epidermis, unilocular, glabrous, thick-walled, ostiolate. Ostiole 19–25 μm diam., single, straight, centrally located. Peridium up to 16–303 μm wide, with outer 3–5 layers of brown cells of textura angularis and inner 1–2 layers of hyaline cells of textura angularis. Paraphyses absent. Conidiophores are reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 5–10 × 2–5 μm ( x ¯ = 7 × 3 μm, n = 20), hyaline, phialidic, subcylindrical, smooth-walled. Conidia 19–21 × 8–10 μm ( x ¯ = 21 × 9 μm, n = 50), oblong to ovoid with a broadly rounded apex, initially hyaline to yellowish and aseptate, becoming brown to dark brown and one septate at maturation, slightly constricted at the septum, smooth-walled, without a mucilaginous sheath.
Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 12 h. Colonies are fast growing on PDA, reaching 90 mm diam. after 5–6 days at 20–23 °C. Sparse, aerial, filamentous, smooth with a crenate edge, white in first few days, becoming grey after one week, and after 2 weeks, becoming black.
Material examined: Thailand, Chiang Mai Province, Amphoe Mae Taeng, Tambon Sop Poeng, 19°07’52.3″ N, 98°45’35.7″ E, on an unidentified dead wood, 9 August 2019, Na Wu, YW173 (MFLU 23-0007, holotype); ex-type living culture MFLUCC 23-0039; ibid., on a decaying wood in a mountain, 7 August 2019, Na Wu, YW217 (GZAAS 23-0587, paratype), living culture GZCC 23-0583; ibid., YW228 (GZAAS 23-0588, paratype), living culture GZCC 23-0584.
Notes: The phylogenetic results (Figure 2) showed that our isolates clustered with Do. ovata and formed a sister group. A comparison of ITS and tef1-α nucleotides shows that Do. septata is significantly different from its sister species, Do. ovata by 7/569 bp (1.2%) in ITS and 13/303 bp (4.3%) in tef1-α. In the phylogenetic analysis, these two species formed two distinct clades in Dothiorella. Morphologically, there are several differences in conidial morphology between these two species. Considering the morpho-molecular data, we introduced Do. septata as a new species.
Lasiodiplodia crassispora T.I. Burgess & P.A.Barber, Mycologia 98: 425 [41] Figure 9.
Index Fungorum number: IF500235.
Saprobic on an unidentified dead wood. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: Conidiomata 151–191 × 178–202 μm ( x ¯ = 171 × 188 μm, n = 20), semi-immersed or immersed in the substrate, solitary, gregarious or confluent, globose to subglobose, centrally ostiolate. Ostiole 21–33 μm diam., centrally located, papillate. Peridium up to 19–46 μm wide, consisting of black and small-celled textura angularis. Paraphyses 2–3 μm wide, hyaline, cylindrical, aseptate, not branched, rounded at apex. Conidiophores are reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 7–12 ×4–7 μm ( x ¯ = 9 × 5 μm, n = 20), hyaline, cylindrical. Conidia 27–33 × 14–17 μm ( x ¯ = 30 × 16 μm, n = 50), hyaline, aseptate, ellipsoid to ovoid, thick-walled, without longitudinal striations or mucilaginous sheath.
Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 24 h. Colonies are fast growing on PDA at 20–25 °C, becoming ash-grey on the surface after 7 days, the reverse is pale grey to grey, and finally black after two weeks, felt-like, sparse, aerial, surface smooth with a crenate edge, filamentous.
Material examined: Thailand, Chiang Mai, Amphoe Mae Taeng, Tambon Cho Lae, 19°08’01.3″ N, 99°00’29.4″ E, on an unidentified dead wood, 6 August 2019, Na Wu, YW191 (MFLU 23-0011), living culture MFLUCC 23-0060.
Notes: The morphology of our collection obtained from decaying woody is similar to the original description of Lasiodiplodia crassispora [41]. In the multi-gene phylogenetic analysis, our new collection clustered with the ex-type strain of L. crassispora (CBS 118741) with strong bootstrap support, and we identified it as L. crassispora.
Lasiodiplodia delonicis N. Wu, A.J. Dissanayake & Jian K. Liu, sp. nov. Figure 10.
Index Fungorum number: IF900581; Facesoffungi number: FoF14261.
Etymology: Referring to the host genus on which the fungus was collected, Delonix regia (Fabaceae).
Holotype: MFLU 23-0005.
Saprobic on a fallen pod of Delonix regia L. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: Conidiomata 110–180 × 124–171 μm ( x ¯ = 139 × 151 μm, n = 20), pyriform, immersed to semi-immersed, solitary, black, ostiolate. Ostiole 20–31 μm diam., central, cylindrical to subcylindrical. Peridium up to 18–35 μm wide, with outer 3–4 layers of brown cells of textura angularis and inner 1–2 layers of hyaline cells of textura angularis. Paraphyses 2–3 μm wide, hyaline, cylindrical, aseptate, not branched. Conidiophores are reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 4–16 × 4–6 μm ( x ¯ = 8 × 5 μm, n = 20), hyaline, cylindrical, sometimes slightly curved. Conidia 26–38 × 13–29 μm ( x ¯ = 32 × 17 μm, n = 50), ellipsoid to ovoid, hyaline, aseptate, thick-walled with granular content, occasionally truncate at base, without longitudinal striations or mucilaginous sheath.
Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 24 h. Colonies are fast growing on PDA, reaching 90 mm diam. after 5 days at 20–25 °C, becoming ash-grey on the surface after one week, with the reverse side of the colonies pale grey to grey, and finally black after two weeks, felt-like, sparse, aerial, surface smooth with crenate edge, filamentous.
Material examined: Thailand, Chiang Rai Province, Amphoe Mueang, Tambon Nang Lae, 20°02’22.7″ N, 99°53’38.1″ E, on a fallen pod of Delonix regia, 17 July 2019, Na Wu, YW111 (MFLU 23-0005, holotype); ex-type living culture MFLUCC 23-0058.
Notes: The phylogenetic tree based on ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 sequence data showed that the new species Lasiodiplodia delonicis (Figure 1) is supported by an absolute bootstrap support (ML/MP/BI = 100/100/1.0). Morphologically, L. delonicis is distinct from other Lasiodiplodia species by its thicker conidial wall and larger conidia. Additionally, conidia of L. delonicis are hyaline throughout the life cycle.
Lasiodiplodia mahajangana Begoude, Jol. Roux & Slippers, Mycol. Progr. 9: 110 [42] Figure 11.
Index Fungorum number: IF514012.
Saprobic on dead seeds of Dipterocarpus retusus L. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: Conidiomata 127–164 × 133–192 μm ( x ¯ = 148 × 160 μm, n = 20), solitary or compound, superficial or immersed, unilocular or multilocular, globose to subglobose, thick-walled, glabrous, ostiolate. Ostiole 26–33 μm diam., single, long, cylindrical to subcylindrical, eccentric. Peridium up to 14–23 μm wide, consisting of brown and small-celled textura angularis. Paraphyses 2–4 μm wide, hyaline, cylindrical, aseptate, not branched, rounded at apex. Conidiophores are reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 6–13 × 4–5 μm ( x ¯ = 8 × 5 μm, n = 20), hyaline, cylindrical, proliferating percurrently to form a periclinal thickening. Conidia 24–31 × 14–18 μm ( x ¯ = 27 × 16 μm, n = 50), initially aseptate, hyaline, ellipsoid to ovoid, thick-walled with granular content, rounded at apex, occasionally truncate at the base, one septate at maturation, without longitudinal striations or mucilaginous sheath.
Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 24 h. Colonies are fast growing on PDA at 20–25 °C, becoming ash-grey on the surface after 7 days, with the reverse side of the colonies pale grey to grey, and finally black after two weeks, felt-like, sparse, aerial, surface smooth with crenate edge, filamentous.
Material examined: Thailand, Chiang Mai Province, Amphoe Mae Taeng, Tambon Cho Lae, 19°08’01.3″ N, 99°00’29.4″ E, on dead seeds of Dipterocarpus retusus L., 10 August 2019, Na Wu, YW151 (MFLU 23-0006), living culture MFLUCC 23-0059.
Notes: In the phylogenetic tree, an isolate obtained in this study (MFLUCC 23-0059) grouped with Lasiodiplodia mahajangana (Figure 1) (ML/MP/BI = 94/95/1.0). Our sample is morphologically similar to L. mahajangana as of the report by Begoude et al. [42], having hyaline, aseptate, ellipsoid to ovoid, thick-walled conidia, which becomes one septate after maturation. We identified our collection as L. mahajangana based on morphology and phylogeny.
Macrophomina euphorbiicola A.R. Machado, D.J. Soares & O.L. Pereira, Eur. J. Pl. Path. 153: 96 [43] Figure 12.
Index Fungorum number: IF815562.
Saprobic on dead seeds of Plukenetia volubilis L. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: Conidiomata 116–172 × 130–161 μm ( x ¯ = 137 × 149 μm, n = 20), circular, dark brown to black, solitary or gregarious, immersed through the epidermis, visible as black dots or papilla on the host, glabrous. Peridium up to 11–24 μm wide, composed of dark brown to black thick-walled textura angularis, becoming thin-walled and hyaline towards the inner region. Ostiole 12–32 μm diam., cylindrical, short, straight, centrally or laterally located. Paraphyses absent. Conidiophores subcylindrical to ampulliform, reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 6–14 × 2–5 μm ( x ¯ = 9 × 3 μm, n = 20), terminal, hyaline, cylindrical to ellipsoidal, smooth-walled. Conidia 22–26 × 8–11 μm ( x ¯ = 23 × 9 μm, n = 50), hyaline, oblong to cylindrical, with rounded apex, and narrow, straight, frequently constricted in the middle, aseptate, contents granular, thick- and smooth-walled, bearing octagonal beard-shaped appendages, or widely flared or irregular, undulate, mucoid apical appendage, basal appendages absent.
Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 12 h with germ tubes produced from the middle or each end. Colonies are fast growing on PDA, reaching 90 mm diam. after 5–6 days at 20–23 °C. Sparse, aerial, filamentous, after 2 weeks, becoming dark brown to black.
Material examined: Thailand, Chiang Rai Province, Thoeng, Tambon Nang Lae, Rai Ruen Rom Organic Farm, 19°39’30.2″ N, 100°09’26.4″ E, on dead seeds of Plukenetia volubilis L., 11 June 2019, Na Wu, YW62 (MFLU 23-0004), living culture MFLUCC 23-0057.
Notes: Macrophomina euphorbiicola was introduced by Machado et al. [43]. Due to the previous cultures failing to sporulate, comparison with the type species was not possible. The phylogenetic analysis showed that our isolate was nested within M. euphorbiicola and claded closer to M. pseudophaseolina (Figure 1). We, thus, identify the new collection as M. euphorbiicola.
Sphaeropsis eucalypticola A.J.L. Phillips, Stud. Mycol. 76: 158 [44] Figure 13.
Index Fungorum number: IF805464; Facesoffungi number: FoF00169.
Saprobic on dead twigs of Tectona grandis. Sexual morph: Ascomata 186–257 × 345–466 μm ( x ¯ = 233 × 373 μm, n = 20), well-developed, bursting through the bark, generally strongly emerged from the host surface, scattered or gregarious, black, subglobose to obpyriform, ostiolate. Ostiole central, subconical to flattened and the region between the perithecial necks were occupied by black pseudoparenchymatous tissue. Peridium 31–59 μm wide, composed of three strata; an outer stratum is black, thick-walled cells, middle layer and inner layer, black thin-walled cells. Hamathecium comprising up to 2–5 μm wide, dense, cellular pseudoparaphyses, anastomosing above and between the asci. Asci 86–134 × 22–36 μm ( x ¯ = 113 × 30 μm, n = 20), bitunicate, eight-spored, broadly clavate, apically rounded with a visible ocular chamber. Ascospores 29–34 × 15–19 μm ( x ¯ = 32 × 17 μm, n = 50), initially rhomboid, hyaline, aseptate, becoming pigmented, brown to dark brown, elliptical to ovoid, thick-walled, smooth at maturity, with an apiculus at either end. Asexual morph: Not observed.
Culture characteristics: Ascospores germinating on PDA within 24 h. Colonies are fast growing on PDA, reaching 60 mm diam. after 5 d at 20–25 °C. Circular, white in first few days, becoming pale grey from the center after one week, and finally black after two weeks, felt-like, sparse, aerial, surface smooth with a crenate edge, filamentous.
Material examined: Thailand, Chiang Mai Province, Amphoe Mae Taeng, Tambon Cho Lae, 19°08’01.3″ N, 99°00’29.4″ E, on dead twigs of Tectona grandis (Lamiaceae), 6 August 2019, Na Wu, YW174 (MFLU 23-0008), living culture MFLUCC 23-0040; ibid., 7 August 2019, Na Wu, YW213 (GZAAS 23-0589), living culture GZCC 23-0589.
Notes: The phylogenetic results (Figure 1) showed that our newly obtained isolate clustered together with Sphaeropsis eucalypticola, and we identified it as S. eucalypticola. This is the first record of S. eucalypticola found on Tectona grandis in Thailand.

4. Discussion

Studies on Botryosphaeriaceae, dealing with the phylogenetic traits and morphology of isolates associated with various hosts, have increased in recent years, enabling the worldwide identification of taxa at the species level [2,5,18,45,46,47,48,49]. In this study, 16 Botryosphaeriaceae isolates were obtained from several decaying woody hosts (dead arial twigs, branches, stems, bark, and seed pods) in southwestern China and northern Thailand, and they were identified as 11 species based on a polyphasic approach of morphological features and molecular phylogeny. These species included Botryosphaeria fujianensis, Diplodia mutila, Di. seriata, Dothiorella ovata, Do. rosacearum, Do. septata, Lasiodiplodia crassispora, L. delonicis, L. mahajangana, Macrophomina euphorbiicola and Sphaeropsis eucalypticola. Of these, Do. ovata, Do. rosacearum, Do. septata and L. delonicis are introduced as novel species, and the remaining seven species were identified as new hosts or new geographical records. All species collected in this study are saprophytic on the host. It should be noted that even though sporulation was induced on sterile toothpicks or pine needles on PDA, the respective asexual morph or sexual morph was not observed. Thus, the fungal identification and classification in this study are based on their morphological characteristics of either asexual or sexual morphs and the phylogenetic analysis results.
Macrophomina and Sphaeropsis are two of the least common genera in the family Botryosphaeriaceae. Five species are validly known in Macrophomina, among which M. phaseolina and M. euphorbiicola were introduced as pathogens [43,50,51,52]. In this study, the asexual morph of M. euphorbiicola was collected from Plukenetia volubilis in northern Thailand. Due to the previous cultures failing to sporulate, the morphology of M. euphorbiicola has not been described [43]. Hence, we provide the first detailed description and illustration of M. euphorbiicola for the first time and also report it as a new record from Plukenetia volubilis in Thailand. Sphaeropsis was typified with S. visci by Saccardo [53] with 632 records in Index Fungorum (Accessed July 2023), and only eight species are recognized with accessible cultures so far [16,44]. In this study, one previously known species, S. eucalypticola, was collected from Tectona grandis in Thailand and reported as a new host record. Sphaeropsis eucalypticola has also been reported on Bauhinia purpurea and Eucalyptus sp. in Thailand [4,54]. Mapook et al. [55] identified S. chromolaenicola from Chromolaena odorata in Thailand. However, the remaining members of the genus have not been found on any host in Thailand.
This study revealed two previously known Diplodia species, Di. mutila and Di. seriata from Sichuan province. It is worth noting that similarly to our collection of Di. mutila (from Prunus persica) and Di. seriata (from Wisteria sinensis), Li et al. [49] also found these two species from dead branches of Camellia oleifera, and another two Diplodia species (Di. acerigena and Di. pistaciicola) in Sichuan province. Diplodia species mainly occur on woody hosts, causing rots, cankers, shoot and tip blight [11,56,57,58,59]. Thus, the discovery and in-depth research of this genus are conducive to the protection of woody plants and the maintenance of greater economic benefits.
Dothiorella was the most frequently isolated genus in this study, as seven Dothiorella isolates were obtained from decaying woody hosts in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. Dothiorella was introduced by Saccardo [53] with Do. pyrenophora as the type species, and presently, only 38 species are accepted in this genus based on phylogenetic analyses [16,18,49]. Zhang et al. [48] made a systematic revision of Dothiorella by synonymizing 15 known species, which reduced the number of Dothiorella members and established a more stable systematic relationship. Most of the members of the genus Dothiorella were rarely collected in Thailand in the past; however, there have been many reports of Dothiorella species being collected in Thailand in recent years [60,61,62,63]. We speculate that this may be due to random sampling. In this study, three new species Do. ovata, Do. rosacearum and Do. septata are introduced based on morphological features (asexual morphs) and phylogenetic evidence.
Lasiodiplodia was formally established by Clendenin [64] with L. tubericola Ellis and Everhart (=L. theobromae) [4] as the type species. So far, 37 ex-type/isotype/neotype species entries have been accepted and uploaded to the Botryosphaeriales website [16,65,66]. It is worth noting that most of the species were introduced as asexual morphs of Lasiodiplodia, and only a few species of sexual morph have been found in nature, such as L. gonubiensis, L. lignicola and L. theobromae [44,67,68]. The three Lasiodiplodia species collected in this study were all asexual morphs and collected from woody plants. Among them, L. crassispora and L. mahajangana were previously known species, and L. delonicis was introduced as a new species. Lasiodiplodia crassispora was first introduced by Burgess et al. [41] based on distinctive morphological characters and phylogenetic analyses. Zhang et al. [48] synonymized L. pyri under L. crassispora. In this study, L. crassispora was collected from decaying wood. Though the species has been found in several countries, such as Australia, Brazil, Namibia, Senegal, and Venezuela [41,48], this is the first time L. crassispora has been reported in Thailand. We collected L. mahajangana from Dipterocarpus retusus in this study. Zhang et al. [48] synonymized L. caatinguensis, L. curvata, L. exigua, L. irregularis, L. macroconidia, and L. pandanicola under L. mahajangana, thus expanding the host range and geographical distribution of this species. Interestingly, the conidia of L. mahajangana are straight or curved, and its conidia morphology is more special compared with other species of Lasiodiplodia [42,48]. At the same time, this study also collected a new species, L. delonicis, from a fallen pod of Delonix regia. In addition, mature conidia with longitudinal striations of Lasiodiplodia is one of its distinguishing features from Diplodia [44]. However, it has been observed that if the asexual stage is produced on culture, the conidia often have obvious longitudinal striations, while the asexual stage produced in nature has less distinct or absent longitudinal striations [61,68,69,70]. This inference can be found in previous reports and this study. The reason for this phenomenon might be due to the variations in the environment in which the fungi grow. Thus, it is important to collect more fresh specimens to verify this observation.
Botryosphaeria fujianensis was introduced as a pathogen-causing stem canker of blueberry in Fujian province, China [37], whereas our species was isolated from dead twigs of Tectona grandis (Lamiaceae) in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. As this is the first record of B. fujianensis isolated from Thailand, we suspect that it might be found on more hosts in the future.
With the increased number of studies of Botryosphaeriaceae based on morphology, ecology, and DNA-based phylogeny, more new species and records are constantly being discovered [7,71,72,73,74]. However, there are still many aspects needed to clarify this fungal family, such as specifying species from environmental samples, resolving the opportunistic pathogenic nature, and defining species boundaries. The results of this study indicate that there is still much potential for Botryosphaeriaceae members to be discovered in China and Thailand. As members of the Botryosphaeriaceae family represent a growing threat to agricultural crops and urban and natural forest ecosystems [75,76,77,78], this finding raises questions about the origin, introduction, and pathway of these fungi as well as underlining the need to develop suitable actions to limit their further spread.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.-K.L., N.W. and A.J.D.; methodology, N.W. and H.-Z.D.; formal analysis, N.W. and A.J.D.; resources, N.W.; data curation, N.W.; writing—original draft preparation, N.W., A.J.D. and H.-Z.D.; writing—review and editing, N.W., A.J.D., H.-Z.D. and J.-K.L.; supervision, J.-K.L.; project administration, J.-K.L.; funding acquisition, J.-K.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP) Program (2019QZKK0503) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 31600032).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study can be found in the NCBI database.

Acknowledgments

Na Wu is grateful to Shaun Pennycook for correcting the Latin names of the novel taxa; Ningguo Liu and Chuangen Lin are thanked for their valuable suggestions. Na Wu also would like to thank the Mae Fah Luang University for its financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schoch, C.L.; Shoemaker, R.A.; Seifert, K.A.; Hambleton, S.; Spatafora, J.W.; Crous, P.W. A multigene phylogeny of the Dothideomycetes using four nuclear loci. Mycologia 2006, 98, 1041–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Phillips, A.J.L.; Hyde, K.D.; Alves, A.; Liu, J.K. Families in Botryosphaeriales: A phylogenetic, morphological and evolutionary perspective. Fungal Divers. 2019, 94, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wulandari, N.F.; To-anun, C.; Hyde, K.D.; Duong, L.M.; de Gruyter, J.; Meffert, J.P.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Crous, P.W. Phyllosticta citriasiana sp. nov., the cause of Citrus tan spot of Citrus maxima in Asia. Fungal Divers. 2009, 34, 23–39. [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu, J.K.; Phookamsak, R.; Doilom, M.; Wikee, S.; Li, Y.M.; Ariyawansha, H.; Boonmee, S.; Chomnunti, P.; Dai, D.Q.; Bhat, J.D.; et al. Towards a natural classification of Botryosphaeriales. Fungal Divers. 2012, 57, 149–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dissanayake, A.J.; Phillips, A.J.L.; Hyde, K.D.; Li, X.H. Botryosphaeriaceae: Current status of genera and species. Mycosphere 2016, 7, 1001–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, Y.; Lin, S.; Zhao, L.; Sun, X.; He, W.; Zhang, Y.; Dai, Y.C. Lasiodiplodia spp. associated with Aquilaria crassna in Laos. Mycol. Prog. 2019, 18, 683–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Senwanna, C.; Mapook, A.; Samarakoon, M.C.; Karunarathna, A.; Wang, Y.; Tang, A.M.C.; Haituk, S.; Suwannarach, N.; Hyde, K.D.; Cheewangkoon, R. Ascomycetes on Para rubber (Hevea brasiliensis). Mycosphere 2021, 12, 1334–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. De Silva, N.I.; Hyde, K.D.; Lumyong, S.; Phillips, A.J.L.; Bhat, D.J.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Thambugala, K.M.; Tennakoon, D.S.; Suwannarach, N.; Karunarathna, S.C. Morphology, phylogeny, host association and geography of fungi associated with plants of Annonaceae, Apocynaceae and Magnoliaceae. Mycosphere 2022, 13, 955–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chethana, K.W.T.; Li, X.; Zhang, W.; Hyde, K.D.; Yan, J. Trail of decryption of molecular research on Botryosphaeriaceae in woody plants. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2016, 55, 147–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Manawasinghe, I.S.; Phillips, A.J.L.; Hyde, K.D.; Chethana, K.W.T.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, W.S.; Yan, J.Y.; Li, X.H. Mycosphere Essays 14: Assessing the aggressiveness of plant pathogenic Botryosphaeriaceae. Mycosphere 2016, 7, 883–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Slippers, B.; Wingfield, M.J. Botryosphaeriaceae as endophytes and latent pathogens of woody plants: Diversity, ecology and impact. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2007, 21, 90–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mehl, J.W.; Slippers, B.; Roux, J.; Wingfield, M.J. Overlap of latent pathogens in the Botryosphaeriaceae on a native and agricultural host. Fungal Biol. 2017, 121, 405–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Theissen, F.; Sydow, H. Vorentwürfe zu den Pseudosphaeriales. Ann. Mycol. 1918, 16, 1–34. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kirk, P.; Cannon, P.; Minter, D.; Stalpers, J. Ainsworth and Bisby’s Dictionary of the Fungi, 10th ed.; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2008; ISBN 978-0-85199-826-8. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hongsanan, S.; Hyde, K.D.; Phookamsak, R.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Sarma, V.V.; Boonmee, S.; Luecking, R.; Bhat, D.J.; Liu, N.G.; et al. Refined families of Dothideomycetes: Orders and families incertae sedis in Dothideomycetes. Fungal Divers. 2020, 105, 17–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, N.; Dissanayake, A.J.; Manawasinghe, I.S.; Rathnayaka, A.R.; Liu, J.K.; Phillips, A.J.L.; Promputtha, I.; Hyde, K.D. https://botryosphaeriales.org/, an up-to-date classification and account of taxa of Botryosphaeriales. Database 2021, 2021, baab061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wijayawardene, N.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Dai, D.Q.; Sánchez-García, M.; Goto, B.T.; Saxena, R.K.; Erdoðdu, M.; Selçuk, F.; Rajeshkumar, K.C.; Aptroot, A.; et al. Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa—2021. Mycosphere 2022, 13, 53–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, L.; Bai, Y.K.; Pan, M.; Tian, C.M.; Fan, X.L. Morphology and molecular analyses reveal three new species of Botryosphaeriales isolated from diseased plant branches in China. MycoKeys 2023, 97, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chomnunti, P.; Hongsanan, S.; Aguirre-Hudson, B.; Tian, Q.; Peršoh, D.; Dhami, M.K.; Alias, A.S.; Xu, J.C.; Liu, X.Z.; Stadler, M.; et al. The sooty moulds. Fungal Divers. 2014, 66, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, J.K.; Chomnunti, P.; Cai, L.; Phookamsak, R.; Chukeatirote, E.; Jones, E.B.G.; Moslem, M.; Hyde, K.D. Phylogeny and morphology of Neodeightonia palmicola sp. nov. from palms. Sydowia 2010, 62, 261–276. [Google Scholar]
  21. Rayner, R.W. A Mycological Colour Chart; Commonwealth Mycological Institute & British Mycological Society: Kew, UK, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chethana, K.W.T.; Manawasinghe, I.S.; Hurdeal, V.G.; Bhunjun, C.S.; Appadoo, M.A.; Gentekaki, E.; Raspé, O.; Promputtha, I.; Hyde, K.D. What are fungal species and how to delineate them? Fungal Divers. 2021, 109, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pem, D.; Jeewon, R.; Chethana, K.W.T.; Hongsanan, S.; Doilom, M.; Suwannarach, N.; Hyde, K.D. Species concepts of Dothideomycetes: Classifcation, phylogenetic inconsistencies and taxonomic standardization. Fungal Divers. 2021, 109, 283–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chaiwan, N.; Gomdola, D.; Wang, S.; Monkai, J.; Tibpromma, S.; Doilom, M.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Mortimer, P.E.; Lumyong, S.; Hyde, K.D. https://gmsmicrofungi.org: An online database providing updated information of microfungi in the Greater Mekong Subregion. Mycosphere 2021, 12, 1513–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  26. Vilgalys, R.; Hester, M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 4239–4246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Carbone, I.; Kohn, L.M. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous Ascomycetes. Mycologia 1999, 91, 553–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Glass, N.L.; Donaldson, G.C. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 1323–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. In Nucleic Acids Symposium Series; Information Retrieval Ltd.: London, UK, 1999; Volume 41, pp. 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  30. Larsson, A. AliView: A fast and lightweight alignment viewer and editor for large datasets. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 3276–3278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vaidya, G.; Lohman, D.J.; Meier, R. SequenceMatrix: Concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics 2011, 27, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dissanayake, A.J.; Bhunjun, C.S.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Liu, J.K. Applied aspects of methods to infer phylogenetic relationships amongst fungi. Mycosphere 2020, 11, 2653–2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nylander, J. MrModeltest (Version 2.2); Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University: Uppsala, Sweden, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  34. Silvestro, D.; Michalak, I. raxmlGUI: A graphical front-end for RAxML. Org. Divers. Evol. 2012, 12, 335–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Swofford, D.L. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods); Version 4.0 b10; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; van der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chu, R.T.; Dou, Z.P.; He, W.; Zhang, Y. Two novel species of Botryosphaeria causing stem canker of blueberries from China. Mycosystema 2021, 40, 473–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Montagne, J.F.C. Notice sur les plantes cryptogames récemment découvertes en France contenant aussi l’indication précis des localités de quelques espèces les plus rares de la flore française. Ann. Des Sci. Nat. Bot. 1834, 2, 295–307. [Google Scholar]
  39. De Notaris, G. Micromycetes Italici novi vel minus cogniti, Decas 4. Mem. Reale Accad. Sci. Torino 1845, 2, 17–30. [Google Scholar]
  40. Shoemaker, R.A. Conidial states of some Botryosphaeria species on Vitis and Quercus. Can. J. Biochem. 1964, 42, 1297–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Burgess, T.I.; Barber, P.A.; Mohali, S.; Pegg, G.; De Beer, W.; Wingfield, M.J. Three new Lasiodiplodia spp. from the tropics, recognized based on DNA sequence comparisons and morphology. Mycologia 2006, 98, 423–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Begoude, B.A.D.; Slippers, B.; Wingfield, M.J.; Roux, J. Botryosphaeriaceae associated with Terminalia catappa in Cameroon, South Africa and Madagascar. Mycol. Prog. 2010, 9, 101–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Machado, A.R.; Pinho, D.B.; Soares, D.J.; Gomes, A.A.M.; Pereira, O.L. Bayesian analyses of five gene regions reveal a new phylogenetic species of Macrophomina associated with charcoal rot on oilseed crops in Brazil. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2018, 153, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Phillips, A.J.L.; Alves, A.; Abdollahzadeh, J.; Slippers, B.; Wingfield, M.J.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Crous, P.W. The Botryosphaeriaceae: Genera and species known from culture. Stud. Mycol. 2013, 76, 51–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dissanayake, A.J.; Chen, Y.Y.; Cheewangkoon, R.; Liu, J.K. Occurrence and Morpho-Molecular Identification of Botryosphaeriales Species from Guizhou Province, China. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Garcia, J.F.; Lawrence, D.P.; Morales-Cruz, A.; Travadon, R.; Minio, A.; Hernandez-Martinez, R.; Rolshausen, P.E.; Baumgartner, k.; Cantu, D. Phylogenomics of Plant-Associated Botryosphaeriaceae species. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 652802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xiao, X.E.; Wang, W.; Crous, P.W.; Wang, H.K.; Jiao, C.; Huang, F.; Pu, Z.X.; Zhu, Z.R.; Li, H.Y. Species of Botryosphaeriaceae associated with citrus branch diseases in China. Persoonia 2021, 47, 106–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhang, W.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Lombard, L.; Schumacher, R.K.; Phillips, A.J.L.; Crous, P.W. Evaluating species in Botryosphaeriales. Persoonia 2021, 46, 63–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Li, W.L.; Liang, R.R.; Dissanayake, A.J.; Liu, J.K. Botryosphaerialean fungi associated with woody oil plants cultivated in Sichuan Province, China. MycoKeys 2023, 97, 71–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Su, G.; Suh, S.O.; Schneider, R.W.; Russin, J.S. Host specialization in the charcoal rot fungus, Macrophomina phaseolina. Phytopathology 2001, 91, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Babu, B.K.; Saxena, A.K.; Srivastava, A.K.; Arora, D.K. Identification and detection of Macrophomina phaseolina by using species-specific oligonucleotide primers and probe. Mycologia 2007, 99, 797–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sarr, M.P.; Ndiaye, M.B.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Crous, P.W. Genetic diversity in Macrophomina phaseolina, the causal agent of charcoal rot. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2014, 53, 250–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Saccardo, P.A. Conspectus genera fungorum Italiae inferiorum. Michelia 1880, 2, 1–38. [Google Scholar]
  54. Phookamsak, R.; Hyde, K.D.; Jeewon, R.; Bhat, D.J.; Jones, E.B.G.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Raspé, O.; Karunarathna, S.C.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Hongsanan, S.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 929–1035: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungi. Fungal Divers. 2019, 95, 1–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mapook, A.; Hyde, K.D.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Jones, E.B.G.; Bhat, D.J.; Jeewon, R.; Stadler, M.; Samarakoon, M.C.; Malaithong, M.; Tanunchai, B.; et al. Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungi associated with the invasive weed Chromolaena odorata (Siam weed). Fungal Divers. 2020, 101, 1–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Crous, P.W.; Slippers, B.; Wingfield, M.J.; Rheeder, J.; Marasas, W.F.O.; Philips, A.J.L.; Alves, A.; Burgess, T.; Barber, P.; Groenewald, J.Z. Phylogenetic lineages in the Botryosphaeriaceae. Stud. Mycol. 2006, 55, 235–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Phillips, A.J.L.; Lopes, J.; Abdollahzadeh, J.; Bobev, S.; Alves, A. Resolving the Diplodia complex on apple and other Rosaceae hosts. Persoonia—Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi 2012, 29, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Linaldeddu, B.T.; Scanu, B.; Maddau, L.; Franceschini, A. Diplodia corticola and Phytophthora cinnamomi: The main pathogens involved in holm oak decline on Caprera island (Italy). For. Pathol. 2014, 44, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Giambra, S.; Piazza, G.; Alves, A.; Mondello, V.; Berbegal, M.; Armengol Fortí, J.; Burruano, S. Botryosphaeriaceae species associated with diseased loquat trees in Italy and description of Diplodia rosacearum sp. nov. Mycosphere 2016, 7, 978–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Doilom, M.; Shuttleworth, L.A.; Roux, J.; Chukeatirote, E.; Hyde, K.D. Botryosphaeriaceae associated with Tectona grandis (teak) in Northern Thailand. Phytotaxa 2015, 233, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jayasiri, S.C.; Hyde, K.D.; Jones, E.B.G.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Jeewon, R.; Phillips, A.J.L.; Bhat, D.J.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Liu, J.K.; Lu, Y.Z.; et al. Diversity, morphology and molecular phylogeny of Dothideomycetes on decaying wild seed pods and fruits. Mycosphere 2019, 10, 1–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Rathnayaka, A.R.; Chethana, K.W.T.; Phillips, A.J.L.; Jones, E.B.G. Two new species of Botryosphaeriaceae (Botryosphaeriales) and new host/geographical records. Phytotaxa 2022, 564, 8–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rathnayaka, A.R.; Chethana, K.W.T.; Pasouvang, P.; Phillips, A.J.L. Morphology and muti-gene phylogenetic analysis reveals Dothiorella chiangmaiensis sp. nov. (Botryosphaeriaceae, Botryosphaeriales) from Thailand. Curr. Res. Environ. Appl. Mycol. (J. Fungal Biol.) 2022, 12, 322–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Clendenin, I. Lasiodiplodia Ellis. and Everh. n. gen. Bot. Gaz. 1896, 21, 92–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. El-Ganainy, S.M.; Ismail, A.M.; Iqbal, Z.; Elshewy, E.S.; Alhudaib, K.A.; Almaghasla, M.I.; Magistà, D. Diversity among Lasiodiplodia Species Causing Dieback, Root Rot and Leaf Spot on Fruit Trees in Egypt, and a Description of Lasiodiplodia newvalleyensis sp. nov. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jami, F.; Marincowitz, S.; Durán, A.; Slippers, B.; Abad, J.I.; Chen, S.; Wingfield, M.J. Botryosphaeriaceae diversity on Eucalyptus clones in different climate zones of Indonesia. For. Pathol. 2022, 52, e12737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Trakunyingcharoen, T.; Lombard, L.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Cheewangkoon, R.; To-Anun, C.; Crous, P.W. Caulicolous Botryosphaeriales from Thailand. Persoonia–Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi 2015, 34, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Dou, Z.P.; He, W.; Zhang, Y. Lasiodiplodia chinensis, a new holomorphic species from China. Mycosphere 2017, 8, 521–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tibpromma, S.; Hyde, K.D.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Bhat, D.J.; Phillips, A.J.L.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Samarakoon, M.C.; Jayawardena, R.S.; Dissanayake, A.J.; Tennakoon, D.S.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 840–928: Micro-fungi associated with Pandanaceae. Fungal Divers. 2018, 93, 1–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Xia, G.Y.; Manawasinghe, I.S.; Phillips, A.J.L.; You, C.P.; Jayawardena, R.S.; Luo, M.; Hyde, K.D. Lasiodiplodia fici sp. nov., Causing Leaf Spot on Ficus altissima in China. Pathogens 2022, 11, 840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Hyde, K.D.; de Silva, N.I.; Jeewon, R.; Bhat, D.J.; Phookamsak, R.; Doilom, M.; Boonmee, S.; Jayawardena, R.S.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Senanayake, I.C.; et al. AJOM new records and collections of fungi: 1–100. Asian J. Mycol. 2020, 3, 22–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Manawasinghe, I.S.; Jayawardena, R.S.; Li, H.L.; Zhou, Y.Y.; Zhang, W.; Phillips, A.J.L.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Dissanayake, A.J.; Li, X.H.; Li, Y.H.; et al. Microfungi associated with Camellia sinensis: A case study of leaf and shoot necrosis on Tea in Fujian, China. Mycosphere 2021, 12, 430–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Manawasinghe, I.S.; Calabon, M.S.; Jones, E.B.G.; Zhang, Y.X.; Liao, C.F.; Xiong, Y.; Chaiwan, N.; Kularathnage, N.D.; Liu, N.G.; Tang, S.M.; et al. Mycosphere notes 345–386. Mycosphere 2022, 13, 454–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sun, J.E.; Meng, C.R.; Phillips, A.J.L.; Wang, Y. Two new Botryosphaeria (Botryosphaeriales, Botryosphaeriaceae) species in China. MycoKeys 2022, 94, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Karani, S.; Njuguna, J.; Runo, S.; Muchugi, A.; Machua, J.; Mwaniki, P. Molecular and morphological identification of fungi causing canker and dieback diseases on Vangueria infausta (Burch) subsp. rotundata (Robyns) and Berchemia discolor (Klotzsch) Hemsl in lower Eastern Kenya. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2022, 21, 6–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wijesinghe, S.N.; Zucconi, L.; Camporesi, E.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Boonmee, S.; Samarakoon, M.C.; Chethana, K.W.T.; Puwakpitiya Gedara, C.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Yong, W.; et al. An updated account of Fagales-inhabiting Italian Ascomycota and mycogeography, with additions to Pezizomycotina. Asian J. Mycol. 2022, 5, 79–186. [Google Scholar]
  77. Si, Y.Z.; Sun, J.W.; Wan, Y.; Chen, Y.N.; He, J.; Li, W.Z.; Li, D.W.; Zhu, L.H. Neofusicoccum cryptomeriae sp. nov. and N. parvum Cause Stem Basal Canker of Cryptomeria japonica in China. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Wonglom, P.; Pornsuriya, C.; Sunpapao, A. A New Species of Neoscytalidium hylocereum sp. nov. Causing Canker on Red-Fleshed Dragon Fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus) in Southern Thailand. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree generated from maximum likelihood (ML) analysis based on combined ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 sequence data for selected closely related genera within the family Botryosphaeriaceae. Bootstrap values for maximum likelihood (ML) and maximum parsimony (MP) equal to or greater than 75% are given near the nodes. Bayesian posterior probabilities (BYPP) equal to or greater than 0.95 are denoted in thickened branches. The strain numbers are given after the species names, and ex-type strains are indicated in bold. The newly generated isolates of this study are in red. The tree is rooted with two isolates of Pseudofusicoccum adansoniae (CBS 122055, CBS 122056).
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree generated from maximum likelihood (ML) analysis based on combined ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 sequence data for selected closely related genera within the family Botryosphaeriaceae. Bootstrap values for maximum likelihood (ML) and maximum parsimony (MP) equal to or greater than 75% are given near the nodes. Bayesian posterior probabilities (BYPP) equal to or greater than 0.95 are denoted in thickened branches. The strain numbers are given after the species names, and ex-type strains are indicated in bold. The newly generated isolates of this study are in red. The tree is rooted with two isolates of Pseudofusicoccum adansoniae (CBS 122055, CBS 122056).
Jof 09 01051 g001aJof 09 01051 g001b
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree generated from the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis based on combined ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 sequence data of Dothiorella. Bootstrap values for maximum likelihood (ML) and maximum parsimony (MP) equal to or greater than 75% are given near the nodes. Branches with Bayesian posterior probabilities (BYPP) equal to or greater than 0.95 are thickened. The new isolates obtained in this study are indicated in red, and ex-type strains are in bold. The tree is rooted to Neofusicoccum parvum (CBS 110301, CMW 9081).
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree generated from the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis based on combined ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 sequence data of Dothiorella. Bootstrap values for maximum likelihood (ML) and maximum parsimony (MP) equal to or greater than 75% are given near the nodes. Branches with Bayesian posterior probabilities (BYPP) equal to or greater than 0.95 are thickened. The new isolates obtained in this study are indicated in red, and ex-type strains are in bold. The tree is rooted to Neofusicoccum parvum (CBS 110301, CMW 9081).
Jof 09 01051 g002
Figure 3. Botryosphaeria fujianensis (MFLU 23-0012). (ac) Ascomata on host substrate. (d) Vertical section of ascomata. (e) Structure of the peridium. (f) Pseudoparaphyses. (g,h) Asci. (i,j) Ascospores. (k) Germinated ascospore. (ln) Colonies on PDA, above (l,n) and below (m). Scale bars: (d) = 50 μm, (e) = 5 μm, (fj) = 10 μm, (k) = 50 μm.
Figure 3. Botryosphaeria fujianensis (MFLU 23-0012). (ac) Ascomata on host substrate. (d) Vertical section of ascomata. (e) Structure of the peridium. (f) Pseudoparaphyses. (g,h) Asci. (i,j) Ascospores. (k) Germinated ascospore. (ln) Colonies on PDA, above (l,n) and below (m). Scale bars: (d) = 50 μm, (e) = 5 μm, (fj) = 10 μm, (k) = 50 μm.
Jof 09 01051 g003
Figure 4. Diplodia mutila (GZAAS 23-0582). (ac) Conidiomata on host substrate. (d,e) Vertical section of conidiomata. (f) Section of peridium. (gi) Conidiogenous cells and developing conidia. (jm) Conidia. (n,o) Colonies on PDA, above (n) and below (o). Scale bars: (df) = 20 μm, (gm) = 10 μm.
Figure 4. Diplodia mutila (GZAAS 23-0582). (ac) Conidiomata on host substrate. (d,e) Vertical section of conidiomata. (f) Section of peridium. (gi) Conidiogenous cells and developing conidia. (jm) Conidia. (n,o) Colonies on PDA, above (n) and below (o). Scale bars: (df) = 20 μm, (gm) = 10 μm.
Jof 09 01051 g004
Figure 5. Diplodia seriata (GZAAS 23-0583). (ac) Conidiomata on host substrate. (d,e) Vertical section of conidiomata. (f) Section of peridium. (gi) Conidiogenous cells and developing conidia. (jm) Conidia. Scale bars: (df) = 20 μm, (gm) = 10 μm.
Figure 5. Diplodia seriata (GZAAS 23-0583). (ac) Conidiomata on host substrate. (d,e) Vertical section of conidiomata. (f) Section of peridium. (gi) Conidiogenous cells and developing conidia. (jm) Conidia. Scale bars: (df) = 20 μm, (gm) = 10 μm.
Jof 09 01051 g005
Figure 6. Dothiorella ovata (MFLU 23-0009, holotype). (ac) Conidiomata on host substrate. (d) Vertical section of conidiomata. (e) Section of peridium. (f) Ostiolar region with periphyses. (gj) Conidiogenous cells and developing conidia. (ko) Conidia. (p) Germinated conidium. (q,r) Colonies on PDA, above (q) and below (r). Scale bars: (b,c) = 50 μm, (d,e) = 20 μm, (f) = 10 μm, (g,h) = 5 μm, (ip) = 10 μm.
Figure 6. Dothiorella ovata (MFLU 23-0009, holotype). (ac) Conidiomata on host substrate. (d) Vertical section of conidiomata. (e) Section of peridium. (f) Ostiolar region with periphyses. (gj) Conidiogenous cells and developing conidia. (ko) Conidia. (p) Germinated conidium. (q,r) Colonies on PDA, above (q) and below (r). Scale bars: (b,c) = 50 μm, (d,e) = 20 μm, (f) = 10 μm, (g,h) = 5 μm, (ip) = 10 μm.
Jof 09 01051 g006
Figure 7. Dothiorella rosacearum (MFLU 23-0014, holotype). (ac) Conidiomata on host substrate. (d) Vertical section of conidiomata. (e) Section of peridium. (fi) Conidiogenous cells and developing conidia. (jm) Conidia. (n) Germinated conidium. (o,p) Colonies on PDA, above (o) and below (p). Scale bars: (d,e) = 50 μm, (fn) = 10 μm.
Figure 7. Dothiorella rosacearum (MFLU 23-0014, holotype). (ac) Conidiomata on host substrate. (d) Vertical section of conidiomata. (e) Section of peridium. (fi) Conidiogenous cells and developing conidia. (jm) Conidia. (n) Germinated conidium. (o,p) Colonies on PDA, above (o) and below (p). Scale bars: (d,e) = 50 μm, (fn) = 10 μm.
Jof 09 01051 g007
Figure 8. Dothiorella septata (MFLU 23-0007, holotype). (ac) Conidiomata on host substrate. (d) Vertical section of conidiomata. (e) Section of peridium. (f) Ostiolar region with periphyses. (gk) Conidiogenous cells and developing conidia. (lo) Conidia. (p) Germinated conidium. (qs) Colonies on PDA, above (q,r) and below (s). Scale bars: (b) = 50 μm, (c,d) = 20 μm, (ep) = 10 μm.
Figure 8. Dothiorella septata (MFLU 23-0007, holotype). (ac) Conidiomata on host substrate. (d) Vertical section of conidiomata. (e) Section of peridium. (f) Ostiolar region with periphyses. (gk) Conidiogenous cells and developing conidia. (lo) Conidia. (p) Germinated conidium. (qs) Colonies on PDA, above (q,r) and below (s). Scale bars: (b) = 50 μm, (c,d) = 20 μm, (ep) = 10 μm.
Jof 09 01051 g008
Figure 9. Lasiodiplodia crassispora (MFLU 23-0011). (ac) Conidiomata on host substrate. (d) Vertical section of conidiomata. (e) Section of peridium. (f) Paraphyses. (gi) Conidiogenous cells and developing conidia. (jm) Conidia. (n) Germinated conidium. (o,p) Colonies on PDA, above (o) and below (p). Scale bars: (b) = 500 μm, (c) = 200 μm, (d,e) = 50 μm, (fi) = 10 μm, (jn) = 20 μm.
Figure 9. Lasiodiplodia crassispora (MFLU 23-0011). (ac) Conidiomata on host substrate. (d) Vertical section of conidiomata. (e) Section of peridium. (f) Paraphyses. (gi) Conidiogenous cells and developing conidia. (jm) Conidia. (n) Germinated conidium. (o,p) Colonies on PDA, above (o) and below (p). Scale bars: (b) = 500 μm, (c) = 200 μm, (d,e) = 50 μm, (fi) = 10 μm, (jn) = 20 μm.
Jof 09 01051 g009
Figure 10. Lasiodiplodia delonicis (MFLU 23-0005, holotype). (a) Specimen. (b,c) Conidiomata on host substrate. (d) Vertical section of conidiomata. (e) Section of peridium. (f) Paraphyses. (gi) Conidiogenous cells and developing conidia. (jl) Conidia. (m) Germinated conidium. (n,o) Colonies on PDA, above (n) and below (o). Scale bars: (b) = 50 μm, (c) = 20 μm, (d,e) = 50 μm, (fm) = 20 μm.
Figure 10. Lasiodiplodia delonicis (MFLU 23-0005, holotype). (a) Specimen. (b,c) Conidiomata on host substrate. (d) Vertical section of conidiomata. (e) Section of peridium. (f) Paraphyses. (gi) Conidiogenous cells and developing conidia. (jl) Conidia. (m) Germinated conidium. (n,o) Colonies on PDA, above (n) and below (o). Scale bars: (b) = 50 μm, (c) = 20 μm, (d,e) = 50 μm, (fm) = 20 μm.
Jof 09 01051 g010
Figure 11. Lasiodiplodia mahajangana (MFLU 23-0006). (ac) Conidiomata on host substrate. (d) Vertical section of conidiomata. (e) Section of peridium. (f) Paraphyses. (gj) Conidiogenous cells and developing conidia. (kn) Conidia. (o) Germinated conidium. (pr) Colonies on PDA, above (p,r) and below (q). Scale bars: (b) = 100 μm, (c) = 20 μm, (d) = 50 μm, (e) = 20 μm, (fo) = 10 μm.
Figure 11. Lasiodiplodia mahajangana (MFLU 23-0006). (ac) Conidiomata on host substrate. (d) Vertical section of conidiomata. (e) Section of peridium. (f) Paraphyses. (gj) Conidiogenous cells and developing conidia. (kn) Conidia. (o) Germinated conidium. (pr) Colonies on PDA, above (p,r) and below (q). Scale bars: (b) = 100 μm, (c) = 20 μm, (d) = 50 μm, (e) = 20 μm, (fo) = 10 μm.
Jof 09 01051 g011
Figure 12. Macrophomina euphorbiicola (MFLU 23-0004). (a) Specimen. (b,c) Conidiomata on host substrate. (d) Vertical section of conidiomata. (e) Section of peridium. (f) Ostiole. (g,h) Conidiogenous cells and developing conidia. (il) Conidia bearing apical appendages (arrows). (m) Germinated conidium. (n,o) Colonies on PDA, above (n) and below (o). Scale bars: (b) = 50 μm, (ce) = 20 μm, (fm) = 10 μm.
Figure 12. Macrophomina euphorbiicola (MFLU 23-0004). (a) Specimen. (b,c) Conidiomata on host substrate. (d) Vertical section of conidiomata. (e) Section of peridium. (f) Ostiole. (g,h) Conidiogenous cells and developing conidia. (il) Conidia bearing apical appendages (arrows). (m) Germinated conidium. (n,o) Colonies on PDA, above (n) and below (o). Scale bars: (b) = 50 μm, (ce) = 20 μm, (fm) = 10 μm.
Jof 09 01051 g012
Figure 13. Sphaeropsis eucalypticola (MFLU 23-0008). (ac) Ascomata on host substrate. (d) Vertical section of ascoma. (e) Structure of peridium. (f) Ostiole. (g) Pseudoparaphyses. (hj) Asci. (ko) Ascospores. (p) Germinated ascospore. (q,r) Colonies on PDA, above (q) and below (r). Scale bars: (b) = 50 μm, (c) = 20 μm, (df) = 50 μm, (g) = 10 μm, (hj) = 20 μm, (kp) = 10 μm.
Figure 13. Sphaeropsis eucalypticola (MFLU 23-0008). (ac) Ascomata on host substrate. (d) Vertical section of ascoma. (e) Structure of peridium. (f) Ostiole. (g) Pseudoparaphyses. (hj) Asci. (ko) Ascospores. (p) Germinated ascospore. (q,r) Colonies on PDA, above (q) and below (r). Scale bars: (b) = 50 μm, (c) = 20 μm, (df) = 50 μm, (g) = 10 μm, (hj) = 20 μm, (kp) = 10 μm.
Jof 09 01051 g013
Table 1. Primers and PCR protocols used in this study.
Table 1. Primers and PCR protocols used in this study.
LocusPrimersOptimized PCR ProtocolsReference
ITSITS594 °C 3 min; 35 cycles of 94 °C 30 s, 55 °C 50 s, 72 °C 1 min; 72 °C 10 min; 4 °C on hold[25]
ITS4
LSULR0R94 °C 3 min; 35 cycles of 94 °C 30 s, 55 °C 50 s, 72 °C 1 min; 72 °C 10 min; 4 °C on hold[26]
LR5
tef1-αEF1-728F94 °C 3 min; 35 cycles of 94 °C 30 s, 55 °C 50 s, 72 °C 1 min; 72 °C 10 min; 4 °C on hold[27]
EF1-986R
tub2Bt2a94 °C 3 min; 35 cycles of 94 °C 30 s, 55 °C 50 s, 72 °C 1 min; 72 °C 10 min; 4 °C on hold[28]
Bt2b
Table 2. Taxa Names, Strain or Specimen numbers, and corresponding GenBank accession numbers of the taxa used for the phylogenetic studies. The newly generated sequences are indicated in red, and ex-type strains are indicated in bold.
Table 2. Taxa Names, Strain or Specimen numbers, and corresponding GenBank accession numbers of the taxa used for the phylogenetic studies. The newly generated sequences are indicated in red, and ex-type strains are indicated in bold.
Taxa NamesStrain/Specimen NumbersGenBank Accession Numbers
ITS LSUtef1-αtub2
Alanphillipsia aloeicolaCBS 138896KP004444KP004472MT592027
Alanphillipsia aloeticaCBS 136409KF777139KF777195MT592028
Barriopsis archontophoenicisMFLUCC 14-1164KX235306KX235307KX235305
Barriopsis stevensianaCBS 174.26EU673330DQ377857EU673296
Botryobambusa fusicoccumMFLUCC 11-0143JX646792JX646809JX646857
Botryobambusa guizhouensisCGMCC 3.20348MZ781425MZ781492MZ852498
Botryosphaeria dothideaCBS 115476AY236949AY928047AY236898AY236927
Botryosphaeria dolichospermatiiCGMCC 3.19096MH491970MH562323MH491974MH562327
Botryosphaeria fabicercianaCBS 127193HQ332197MF410028HQ332213KF779068
Botryosphaeria fabicercianaCBS 127194HQ332198MF410029HQ332214KF779069
Botryosphaeria fujianensisCGMCC 3.19099MH491973MH562326MH491977MH562330
Botryosphaeria fujianensisBJFUCC 180226-3MW251380MW251381MW251388MW251379
Botryosphaeria fujianensisMFLUCC 23-0041OR052056OR052040OR030453OR030471
Botryosphaeria qingyuanensisCGMCC 3.18742KX278000MF410042KX278105KX278209
Botryosphaeria tenuisporaMUCC 237LC585278LC585150LC585174
Cophinforma eucalyptiMFLUCC 11-0425JX646800JX646817JX646865JX646848
Cophinforma eucalyptiMFLUCC 11-0655JX646801JX646818JX646866JX646849
Cophinforma mamaneCBS 117444KF531822DQ377855KF531801KF531802
Diplodia mutilaCBS 112553AY259093AY928049AY573219DQ458850
Diplodia mutilaCBS 112875AY343484AY343370MT592509
Diplodia mutilaGZCC 23-0578OR052057OR020607OR030454OR030472
Diplodia neojuniperiCBS 138652KM006431KM006462MT592516
Diplodia sapineaCBS 393.84DQ458895DQ377893DQ458880DQ458863
Diplodia scrobiculataCBS 118110AY253292KF766326AY624253AY624258
Diplodia seriataCBS 112555AY259094AY928050AY573220DQ458856
Diplodia seriataCBS 112661MT587378MT592084MT592541
Diplodia seriataGZCC 23-0579OR052058OR052041OR030455OR030473
Diplodia subglobosaCBS 124133GQ923856GQ923824MT592576
Dothiorella acacicolaCBS 141295KX228269KX228320KX228376
Dothiorella acericolaKUMCC 18-0137MK359449MK361182
Dothiorella albiziaeMFLUCC 22-0057ON751762ON751764ON799588ON799590
Dothiorella alpinaCGMCC 3.18001KX499645KX499651
Dothiorella baihuashanensisCFCC 58549OQ692933OQ692927
Dothiorella baihuashanensisCFCC 58788OQ692934OQ692928
Dothiorella brevicollisCBS 130411JQ239403JQ239416JQ239390JQ239371
Dothiorella camelliaeCGMCC 3.24158OQ190531OQ241464OQ275064
Dothiorella capri-amissiCBS 121763EU101323KX464301EU101368KX464850
Dothiorella casuarinaeCBS 120688DQ846773MH874647DQ875331DQ875340
Dothiorella citricolaCBS 124728EU673322EU673289KX464852
Dothiorella citrimurcotticolaCGMCC 3.20394MW880661MW884164MW884193
Dothiorella citrimurcotticolaCGMCC 3.20395MW880662MW884165MW884194
Dothiorella diospyricolaCBS 145972MT587398MT592110MT592581
Dothiorella dulcispinaeCBS 130413JQ239400JQ239413JQ239387JQ239373
Dothiorella dulcispinaeCMW 36462JQ239402JQ239415JQ239389JQ239375
Dothiorella eriobotryaeCBS 140852KT240287KT240262MT592582
Dothiorella heterophyllaeCMW46458MN103794MH548348MH548324
Dothiorella iranicaCBS 124722KC898231KC898214KX464856
Dothiorella koaeCMW 48017MH447652MH548338MH548327
Dothiorella lampangensisMFLUCC 18-0232MK347758MK340869MK412874
Dothiorella longicollisCBS 122068EU144054MH874718EU144069KF766130
Dothiorella magnoliaeCFCC 51563KY111247KY213686
Dothiorella mangifericolaIRAN 1584CMT587407MT592119
Dothiorella monetiMUCC 505EF591920EF591937EF591971EF591954
Dothiorella obovataMFLUCC 22-0058ON751763ON751765ON799589ON799591
Dothiorella ovataMFLUCC 23-0035OR052059OR020691OR030456OR030474
Dothiorella ovataMFLUCC 23-0036OR052060OR052042OR030457OR030475
Dothiorella plurivoraCBS 124724KC898225KC898208KX464874
Dothiorella pretoriensisCBS 130404JQ239405JQ239418JQ239392JQ239376
Dothiorella prunicolaCBS 124723EU673313EU673232EU673280EU673100
Dothiorella rosacearumMFLUCC 23-0038OR052061OR052043OR030458OR030476
Dothiorella rosacearumMFLUCC 23-0037OR052062OR052044OR030459OR030477
Dothiorella santaliWAC 13155EF591924EF591941EF591975EF591958
Dothiorella sarmentorumCBS 115038AY573206DQ377860AY573223EU673101
Dothiorella sarmentorumIMI 63581bAY573212AY928052AY573235
Dothiorella septataMFLUCC 23-0039OR020942OR020695OR030462OR030480
Dothiorella septataGZCC 23-0583OR019776OR052047OR030463OR030481
Dothiorella septataGZCC 23-0584OR019803OR052048OR030464OR030482
Dothiorella striataCBS 124731EU673321EU673288EU673143
Dothiorella striataCBS 124730EU673320EU673240EU673287EU673142
Dothiorella tectonaeMFLUCC 18-0382KM396899KM409637KM510357
Dothiorella thailandicaMFLUCC 11-0438JX646796JX646813JX646861JX646844
Dothiorella thripsitaCBS 125445FJ824738KJ573639KJ577550
Dothiorella ulmaceaCBS 138855KR611881KR611899KR611910KR611909
Dothiorella ulmaceaCBS 140005KR611882KR857697MT592607
Dothiorella uruguayensisCBS 124908EU080923MH874932EU863180KX464886
Dothiorella vinea-gemmaeDAR 81012KJ573644KJ573641KJ577552
Dothiorella viticolaCBS 117009AY905554MH874565AY905559EU673104
Dothiorella yunnanaCGMCC 3.18000KX499644KX499650
Dothiorella zanthoxyliCGMCC 3.24159OQ190536OQ241468OQ275069
Endomelanconiopsis endophyticaCBS 120397EU683656EU683629EU683637KF766131
Endomelanconiopsis freycinetiaeMFLUCC 17-0547MG646955MG646948MG646983MG646924
Eutiarosporella africanaCMW 38423KC769956KC769990KC769852
Eutiarosporella dactylidisMFLUCC 13-0276KM978944KM978949KP031694
Eutiarosporella urbis-rosarumCMW 36477JQ239407JQ239420JQ239394JQ239381
Lasiodiplodia crassisporaCBS 118741DQ103550DQ377901DQ103557KU887506
Lasiodiplodia crassisporaCMW 13488DQ103552DQ103559KU887507
Lasiodiplodia crassisporaMFLUCC 23-0060OR052065OR020699OR030465OR030483
Lasiodiplodia delonicisMFLUCC 23-0058OR052066OR052049OR030466OR030484
Lasiodiplodia mahajanganaCBS 124925FJ900595FJ900641FJ900630
Lasiodiplodia mahajanganaCBS 124926FJ900596FJ900642FJ900631
Lasiodiplodia mahajanganaMFLUCC 23-0059OR052067OR052050OR030467OR030485
Lasiodiplodia rubropurpureaWAC 12535DQ103553DQ377903DQ103571EU673136
Lasiodiplodia rubropurpureaWAC 12536DQ103554DQ103572KU887530
Lasiodiplodia thailandicaCBS 138760KJ193637KJ193681
Lasiodiplodia thailandicaCBS 138653KM006433KM006464
Lasiodiplodia theobromaeCBS 164.96AY640255EU673253AY640258KU887532
Lasiodiplodia theobromaeCBS 111530EF622074EF622054KU887531
Lasiodiplodia venezuelensisWAC 12539DQ103547DQ377904DQ103568KU887533
Lasiodiplodia venezuelensisWAC 12540DQ103548DQ103569KU887534
Lasiodiplodia viticolaCBS 128313HQ288227KX098286HQ288269HQ288306
Lasiodiplodia viticolaCBS 128314HQ288228HQ288270HQ288307
Macrophomina euphorbiicolaCMM 4134KU058936KU058906MF457658
Macrophomina euphorbiicolaCMM 4045KU058928KU058898MF457657
Macrophomina euphorbiicolaMFLUCC 23-0057OR052068OR052051OR030468OR030486
Macrophomina phaseolinaCBS 205.47KF951622KF951997MW592323
Macrophomina pseudophaseolinaCBS 137165KF951791KF952153KF952233
Macrophomina tectaBRIP 70781MW591684MW592271MW592300
Marasasiomyces karooCBS 118718KF531828DQ377939KF531807KF531808
Mucoharknessia cortaderiaeCPC 19974KM108374KM108401
Mucoharknessia anthoxanthiiMFLUCC 15-0904KU246377KU246379
Neodeightonia subglobosaCBS 448.91EU673337DQ377866EU673306EU673137
Neodeightonia phoenicumCBS 122528EU673340EU673261EU673309EU673116
Neodeightonia phoenicumCBS 123168EU673339EU673260EU673308EU673115
Neoscytalidium dimidiatumCBS 145.78KF531816DQ377922KF531795KF531796
Neoscytalidium dimidiatumCBS 251.49KF531819DQ377923KF531797KF531799
Oblongocollomyces variabilisCBS 121774EU101312KX464536EU101357
Oblongocollomyces variabilisCBS 121775EU101314MT587319EU101359
Phaeobotryon mamaneCBS 122980EU673332EU673248EU673298
Phaeobotryon cupressiCBS 124700FJ919672KX464538FJ919661
Sakireeta madreeyaCBS 532.76KC769960DQ377940KM108427KX465084
Sardiniella celtidisMFLUCC 17-981MF443249MF443248
Sardiniella urbanaCBS 141580KX379674KX379676KX379675
Sardiniella urbanaBL180KX379677KX379679KX379678
Sphaeropsis citrigenaICMP 16812EU673328EU673246EU673294EU673140
Sphaeropsis eucalypticolaMFLUCC 11-0579JX646802JX646819JX646867JX646850
Sphaeropsis eucalypticolaMFLUCC 11-0654JX646803JX646820JX646868JX646851
Sphaeropsis eucalypticolaMFLUCC 23-0040OR052069OR052052OR030469OR030488
Sphaeropsis eucalypticolaGZCC 23-0589OR052070OR052053OR030470OR030487
Sphaeropsis porosaCBS 110496AY343379DQ377894AY343340EU673130
Sphaeropsis visciCBS 100163EU673324EU754215EU673292EU673127
Sphaeropsis guizhouensisCGMCC 3.20352MZ781433MZ781500MZ852506
Tiarosporella palludosaCPC 22701KM108378KM108404KM108471
Tiarosporella palludosaCPC 22702KM108379KM108405KM108472
Neofusicoccum mangiferaeCBS 118531AY615185DQ377921DQ093221AY615172
Neofusicoccum parvumCMW 9081AY236943AY928045AY236888AY236917
Neofusicoccum parvumCBS 110301AY259098AY928046AY573221EU673095
Pseudofusicoccum adansoniaeCBS 122055EF585523EF585571MT592771
Pseudofusicoccum adansoniaeCBS 122056EF585524MT592279MT592772
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, N.; Dissanayake, A.J.; Du, H.-Z.; Liu, J.-K. Morpho-Phylogenetic Evidence Reveals Novel Species and New Records of Botryosphaeriaceae in China and Thailand. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9111051

AMA Style

Wu N, Dissanayake AJ, Du H-Z, Liu J-K. Morpho-Phylogenetic Evidence Reveals Novel Species and New Records of Botryosphaeriaceae in China and Thailand. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(11):1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9111051

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Na, Asha J. Dissanayake, Hong-Zhi Du, and Jian-Kui Liu. 2023. "Morpho-Phylogenetic Evidence Reveals Novel Species and New Records of Botryosphaeriaceae in China and Thailand" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 11: 1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9111051

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop