Next Article in Journal
The Response of Paracoccidioides lutzii to the Interaction with Human Neutrophils
Next Article in Special Issue
Additions to Diatrypaceae (Xylariales): Novel Taxa and New Host Associations
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Location, Disinfection, and Building Materials on the Presence and Richness of Culturable Mycobiota through Oligotrophic Drinking Water Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Morpho-Phylogenetic Evidence Reveals Novel Species and New Records of Botryosphaeriaceae in China and Thailand
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Updates on Apiospora: Introducing Four New Species from Wurfbainia villosa and Grasses in China

by
Chunfang Liao
1,2,3,
Indunil Chinthani Senanayake
1,
Wei Dong
1,
Kandawatte Wedaralalage Thilini Chethana
1,2,3,
Khanobporn Tangtrakulwanich
3,
Yunxia Zhang
1 and
Mingkwan Doilom
1,*
1
Innovative Institute for Plant Health, Key Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control on Fruits and Vegetables in South China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China
2
Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand
3
School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(11), 1087; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9111087
Submission received: 19 August 2023 / Revised: 17 October 2023 / Accepted: 1 November 2023 / Published: 6 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Taxonomy, Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi)

Abstract

:
Apiospora, an ascomycetous genus in Apiosporaceae, comprises saprobes, endophytes, and pathogens of humans and plants. They have a cosmopolitan distribution with a wide range of hosts reported from Asia. In the present study, we collected and isolated Apiospora species from Wurfbainia villosa and grasses in Guangdong and Yunnan provinces in China. Multi-locus phylogeny based on the internal transcribed spacer, the large subunit nuclear rDNA, the partial translation elongation factor 1-α, and β-tubulin was performed to clarify the phylogenetic affinities of the Apiospora species. Based on the distinctive morphological characteristics and molecular evidence, Ap. endophytica, Ap. guangdongensis, Ap. wurfbainiae, and Ap. yunnanensis are proposed. Descriptions, illustrations, and notes for the newly discovered species are provided and compared with closely related Apiospora species. An updated phylogeny of Apiospora is presented, along with a discussion on the phylogenetic affinities of ambiguous taxa.

1. Introduction

Recent advances in fungal taxonomy and phylogeny have resulted in taxonomic revisions in numerous genera [1,2,3,4], including Apiospora. Apiospora belongs to Apiosporaceae, Amphisphaeriales, Sordariomycetes, and Ascomycota [5]. It was introduced by Saccardo [6], but the typification was not indicated. Subsequently, Clements and Shear [7] designated Apiospora montagnei Sacc. as the type species. However, Crous and Groenewald [8] synonymized Ap. montagnei under Arthrinium arundinis based on the presence of similar characters in their sexual morphs, including multi-locular perithecial stromata and hyaline ascospores surrounded by a thick gelatinous sheath, and also considering that Arthrinium is an older and more commonly referred to name than Apiospora [8,9,10,11]. Crous and Groenewald [8], therefore, treated the sexual genus Apiospora as a synonym of Arthinium on the basis that Arthinium is earlier proposal and in more frequent usage [10,11]. This taxonomic treatment has been followed by several studies [12,13,14]. Subsequently, Pintos and Alvarado [15] re-evaluated the phylogenetic placements of Apiospora and Arthrinium based on multi-locus phylogeny using the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), large subunit nuclear rDNA (LSU), the partial translation elongation factor 1-α (tef1-α), and β-tubulin (tub2) sequence data. The result showed that several Arthrinium species, including the type species Ar. caricicola, form a well-supported but distant clade compared to other Arthrinium species, indicating them into two independent genera. Therefore, the species within this clade were retained in Arthrinium, while other species were transferred to Apiospora [15]. Apiospora is accepted with conidia that are globose to subglobose in the face view and lenticular in the side view with a pale equatorial slit, whereas Arthrinium possesses conidia of various shapes (angular, curved, fusiform, globose, polygonal, and navicular) [15]. The sexual morphs of Apiospora are characterized by immersed, dark brown to black, lenticular, or dome-shaped ascostromata that are erumpent through a longitudinal split, unitunicate, broadly clavate to cylindric-clavate asci, and hyaline ascospores that are 1-septate near the lower end, with or without a sheath [13]. Based on the recent taxonomic treatment and multi-locus phylogenetic analyses, sixty-eight species of Arthrinium were synonymized under Apiospora [14,15,16]. Up to now, 133 epithets are listed under Apiospora in the Index Fungorum [17].
Species of Apiospora are distributed worldwide, mostly from terrestrial and aquatic habitats in Asia [14,17,18]. They are reported as important plant pathogens causing significant damage to economic plants. For example, Apiospora arundinis (previously known as Arthrinium arundinis) is a causal agent of leaf edge spot disease of peach (Prunus persica) in China, with a 20 to 40% disease incidence in two hectares of a severely infected peach orchard [19]. Apiospora arundinis has been commonly reported as the pathogen of Phyllostachys praecox, causing brown culm streak [20]. Apiospora sacchari is reported to cause Barley kernel blight [21], while Ap. phaeospermum is a pathogen causing damping-off disease in wheat [22]. In addition, Apiospora arundinis and A. montagnei have been reported as animal and human pathogens that cause onychomycosis [23,24]. They are also isolated from air and soil, while some are lichen-associated [12,17]. Many Apiospora species are known as saprobes and endophytes on many host plants, including thorny bamboo (Bambusa bambos), bristlegrass (Setaria viridis), loquat (Eriobotrya japonica), windmill palm (Trachycarpus fortunei), and tea (Camellia sinensis) [12,15,16,24,25,26,27,28,29].
In a survey for fungi associated with monocotyledon plants in China, we collected and isolated Apiospora strains from Wurfbainia villosa and grasses in Guangdong and Yunnan provinces. The identifications of Apiospora strains in this study were performed through the combination of ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 sequence analyses, along with morphological characteristics. A pairwise homoplasy index test was conducted to determine the recombination level within phylogenetically closely related species. The novel Apiospora species were identified, following the guidelines in Jeewon and Hyde [30], Maharachchikumbura et al. [31], and Pem et al. [4].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection, Observation, and Isolation

Saprobic fungi were collected from dead stems of grasses at the Kunming Institute of Botany, Kunming City, Yunnan Province, China. The samples were placed into zip-lock bags and returned to the laboratory for fungal observation and isolation. The specimens were observed after 2–3 days of inoculation at room temperature using SZ650 (Chongqing Auto Optical Instrument Co., Ltd., Chongqing, China) stereo microscope. Fungal structures (e.g., ascomata, hamathecium, asci, and ascospores) were examined using Nikon Eclipse 80i, connected to the industrial Digital Sight DS-Fi1 (Panasonic, Tokyo, Japan) microscope imaging system. Single spore isolation was performed as described by Senanayake et al. [28]. The germinated spores were grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA: potato 200 g/L, dextrose 15 g/L, agar 15 g/L) and incubated at 25 ± 2 °C for two weeks.
Endophytic fungi were isolated from the healthy leaves of Wurfbainia villosa in Yongning town, Yangjiang City, Guangdong Province, China. The isolation procedures of plant materials were performed as described by Senanayake et al. [28]. Briefly, fresh, healthy leaves were gently rinsed with tap water to eliminate any accumulated particulate matter. The leaves were surface sterilized in 2.5% sodium hypochlorite for 1 min, followed by 75% ethanol for 2 min. The samples were subsequently rinsed three times with sterile water for 3 min each time and air-dried using sterile tissue filter paper. The sterilized leaves were then cut into 0.5 × 0.5 cm pieces using sterile scissors and aseptically transferred onto PDA and incubated at 25 °C [28]. The hyphal tips grown from sterilized leaves after three days of incubation were transferred to fresh PDA for three to four times for purification to obtain a pure culture.
All fungal isolates were preserved on PDA slants and stored at 4 °C and in 15% glycerol. The fungal structures were measured using Tarosoft (R) Image Frame Work program v. 0.9.7. and NIS-Elements BR 5.30.03. The living cultures were deposited in the Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering Culture Collection (ZHKUCC), Guangdong, China. Herbarium specimens were deposited in the Mycological Herbarium of Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering (MHZU), Guangzhou, China. The new species were registered in Faces of Fungi (FoF) (http://www.facesoffungi.org; accessed on 17 October 2023) [32] and Index Fungorum (IF) databases (http://www.indexfungorum.org/names/names.asp; accessed on 17 October 2023). The records of Greater Mekong Subregion fungi will be placed in the GMS database [33].

2.2. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Sequencing

Fungal mycelia grown on PDA for 5–7 days were collected for Genomic DNA extraction using the MagPure Plant DNA AS Kit, following the manufacturer’s instructions (Guangzhou Magen Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China). Extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS), large subunit rDNA (LSU), β-tubulin (tub2), and partial translation elongation factor 1–α (tef1-α) were amplified and sequenced using primer ITS1 and ITS4 [34,35], LR5 and LR0R [36], BT2a and BT2b [37], and EF1-728F and EF2 [38,39], respectively.
The 25 µL volume of Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) contains 12.5 µL 2 × Taq Master Mix (buffer, dNTPs, and Taq; Nanjing Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China), 9.5 µL of ddH2O, 1 µL of each primer, and 1 µL of DNA template. The PCR thermal cycle program for ITS and LSU amplification was conducted with an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s; the annealing temperature was 52 °C for 30 s for ITS and LSU; 72 °C for 1 min; and final elongation at 72 °C for 10 min. The annealing temperatures were adjusted to 53.5 °C (30 s) and 55 °C (45 s) for tub2 and tef1-α, respectively. PCR products were purified and sequenced by Tianyi Huiyuan Gene Technology & Services Co. (Guangzhou, China). All sequences generated in this study were submitted to GenBank [40].

2.3. Phylogenetic Analyses

The sequence quality of obtained sequences was assured by checking chromatograms using Bioeidit v. 7.2.3 [41]. Sequences used for phylogenetic analysis were downloaded from GenBank according to the Blastn search of ITS in the GenBank database and following the published literature [16]. A total of 191 sequences were used in the phylogenetic analysis (Table 1). Sporocadus trimorphus strains CFCC 55171 and ROC 113 were used as outgroup taxa. Four loci, ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2, were aligned in MAFFT version v. 7 online program [42] and edited manually where necessary using BioEdit v. 7.2.3 [41]. Alignments were converted to NEXUS format using Alignment Transformation Environment online platform (http://www.sing-group.org/ALTER/; accessed on 17 October 2023).
Maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses were performed in the CIPRES Science Gateway online platform [43] based on the combined ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 sequence data. The ML analysis was carried out with GTR+G+I evolutionary substitution using RAxML-HPC v.8.2.12 on XSEDE (https://www.phylo.org/; accessed on 17 October 2023) [44], with 1000 rapid bootstrap inferences, followed by a thorough ML search. All free model parameters were estimated by RAxML ML of 25 per site rate categories. The likelihood of the final tree was evaluated and optimized under GAMMA. Bayesian Inference (BI) analysis was conducted using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method and performed in MrBayes XSEDE (3.2.7a) [45]. Six simultaneous Markov chains were run for 2,000,000 generations, and the trees were sampled for each 100th generation. Phylogenetic trees were visualized in FigTree v. 1.4.0 [46] and formatted using PowerPoint 2010 (Microsoft Corporation, WA, USA).

2.4. Pairwise Homoplasy Index (PHI)

A pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test [47] was performed using SplitsTree v. 4.15.1 [48] to determine the recombination level within phylogenetically closely related species of the new strains in this study (Apiospora endophytica, A. guangdongensis) with A. arundinis, A. aurea, A. cordylies, and A. hydei. The combined ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 of these phylogenetically closely related species were applied for PHI test and analyses. The PHI results (Φw) > 0.05 indicated no significant recombination in the dataset. The relationships between our strains with closely related taxa were visualized by constructing splits graphs using Log-Det transformation and split decomposition options using SplitsTree v. 4.15.1.

3. Results

3.1. Phylogeny

The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the combined ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 sequence data of 191 strains (including our new strains), with Sporocadus trimorphus strains CFCC 55171 and ROC 113 as outgroup taxa. There are a total of 2936 characters, including gaps (ITS: 1–772, LSU: 773–1621, tef1-α: 1622–2309, tub2: 2310–2936). The topology of the ML analysis was similar to the BI analysis, and the best-scoring RAxML tree with a final ML optimization likelihood value of -36321.892470 is presented (Figure 1). The matrix had 1805 distinct alignment patterns, with 38.08% undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.208057, C = 0.296775, G = 0.242495, T = 0.252673; substitution rates AC = 1.090339, AG = 3.411914, AT = 1.286700, CG = 0.887072, CT = 4.062650, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.777262. Phylogenetic analyses showed that our strains belong to Apiospora. The isolates ZHKUCC 23-0010 and ZHKUCC 23-0011 had a close affinity to Apiospora phyllostachydis (MFLUCC 18-1101) with 100% ML bootstrap support and 1.00 BYPP. The isolates ZHKUCC 23-0004 and ZHKUCC 23-0005 formed a sister to A. arundinis (CBS 449.92 and CBS 133509) with 100% ML bootstrap support and 1.00 BYPP. Two isolates of ZHKUCC 23-0014 and ZHKUCC 23-0015 formed a distinct lineage and sister to A. qinlingensis (CFCC 52303 and CFCC 52304) and A. koreana (KUC21332 and KUC21348) with 96% ML bootstrap support and 0.90 posterior probability in BI analysis. The isolates ZHKUCC 23-0012 and ZHKUCC 23-0013 clustered with A. guizhounese (LC 5318 and LC 5322) with low support in ML and BI analyses (44% ML and 0.72 BYPP). The isolates ZHKUCC 23-0006 and ZHKUCC 23-0007 formed a sister to A. hydei (CBS 114990 and KUMCC 16-0204) with 96% ML bootstrap support and 1.00 BYPP. Two isolates, ZHKUCC 23-0008 and ZHKUCC 23-0009, formed a distinct lineage and sister to Apiospora species with 80% ML and 1.00 BYPP (Figure 1).

3.2. A Pairwise Homoplasy Index

The recombination level within phylogenetically closely related species of generated strains of Apiospora endophytica with A. aurea, A. cordylines, and A. hydei as well as phylogenetically closely related species of A. guangdongensis with A. arundinis were implied in a pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test using combined ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 sequence dataset. The PHI result showed that there was no evidence of significant recombination (Φw = 0.06901) among A. endophytica, A. aurea, A. cordylines, and A. hydei with the combined dataset (Figure 2). The A. guangdongensis and A. arundinis has also no significant evidence of recombination (Φw = 1.00) (Figure 3).

3.3. Taxonomy

Apiospora endophytica C.F. Liao and Doilom, sp. nov. Figure 4.
Index Fungorum number: IF900356; Facesoffungi number: FoF14658.
Etymology: The epithet “endophytica” refers to the endophytic lifestyle of the species.
Endophytic in leaves of Wurfbainia villosa. Sexual morph: undetermined. Asexual morph: sporulating on PDA after one month, spore mass visible as black, scattered on white colonies. Hyphae 2–5 μm wide ( X ¯ = 2.5 μm, n = 30), branched, hyaline to golden brown, septate, smooth-walled. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 4–14 × 2–7 μm ( X ¯ = 7.5 × 5 μm, n = 35), aggregated in clusters or solitary, hyaline to golden brown, erect, unbranched, cylindrical or clavate, ampulliform or obtriangular, and smooth-walled. Conidia 14–19 × 12–18 μm ( X ¯ = 17 × 15 μm, n = 30) in the face view, 11–19 × 9–16 μm ( X ¯ = 15 × 12 μm, n = 20) in the side view, initially hyaline, becoming pale brown to dark brown, globose to subglobose, obovoid to ellipsoidal in the face view, lenticular with a thick equatorial slit in the side view, and smooth-walled. Sterile cells not observed.
Culture characteristics: colonies on PDA reached 2.6 cm in one week at 28 ± 2 °C, fluffy, spreading, with dense, aerial mycelium, composed of small bumps, forming a circle around the center, surface and reverse both golden yellow in the center, and turning white at the edge.
Material examined: China, Guangdong Province, Yangjiang City, Yongning town, 24°40′53″ N 118°41′31″ E, asymptomatic leaves of Wurfbainia villosa (Lour.) Škorničk. and A.D. Poulsen (Zingiberaceae), 1 October 2021, Chunfang Liao, (ZHKU 23-0002, holotype, dried culture); ex-type living culture ZHKUCC 23-0006, ibid., and living culture ZHKUCC 23-0007.
Notes: In the phylogenetic analyses (Figure 1), Ap. endophytica (ZHKUCC 23-0006, ZHKUCC 23-0007) clustered sister to Ap. hydei (CBS 114990 and KUMCC 16-0204) with 96% ML bootstrap support and 1.00 BYPP and formed a distinct lineage separated from Ap. cordylines (GUCC 10026) with 100% ML bootstrap support and 1.00 BYPP) and Ap. aurea (CBS 244.83) by 100% ML bootstrap support and 1.00 BYPP. Morphologically, conidiogenous cells of Ap. endophytica are cylindrical or clavate, ampulliform or obtriangular, while they are subcylindrical to doliiform to lageniform in Ap. hydei. The conidia of Ap. endophytica are dark brown and smooth, while they are brown and roughened in Ap. hydei. In addition, Ap. endophytica has larger conidiogenous cells compared to than those of Ap. hydei (4–14 × 2–7 μm vs. 5–8 × 4–5 μm). Apiospora endophytica differs from Ap. cordylines and Ap. aurea based on the size and shape of conidiogenous cells and conidia (Table 2). The PHI test results indicated no significant recombination between Ap. endophytica and closely related species Ap. aurea (CBS 244.83), Ap. cordylies (GUCC 10026), and Ap. hydei (CBS 114990) (Figure 2). Both morphological and molecular evidence supported Ap. endophytica as a new species.
Apiospora guangdongensis C.F. Liao and Doilom, sp. nov. Figure 5.
Index Fungorum number: IF900357; Facesoffungi number: FoF14659.
Etymology: The epithet “guangdongensis” refers to the locality, Guangdong Province, China where the holotype was collected.
Endophytic in asymptomatic leaves of Wurfbainia villosa. Sexual morph: undetermined. Asexual morph: sporulated on PDA after one month, spore mass visible as black, scattered to aggregated on white colonies. Hyphae 2–3 μm diam. ( X ¯ = 2.5 μm, n = 30), branched, hyaline, septate, smooth, thin-walled, forming hyphal coils. Conidiophores 45–53 × 2–4 μm ( X ¯ = 49 × 2.5 μm, n = 30), micronematous, mononematous, erect, solitary, subcylindrical, unbranched, straight or flexuous, hyaline, smooth-walled, sometimes reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 4–9 × 2–5 μm ( X ¯ = 6 × 3.5 μm, n = 30), arising from hyphae, aggregated in clusters or solitary, terminal or lateral, smooth, straight or slightly curved, cylindrical or ampulliform, and sometimes ovate or obpyriform. Conidia 6–9 × 5–9 μm ( X ¯ = 8 × 7 μm, n = 30) in the face view, 5–8 × 4–6 μm ( X ¯ = 6.5 × 5 μm, n = 30) in the side view, initially hyaline, becoming pale brown to dark brown, globose to ellipsoidal in face view, lenticular with broad equatorial slit in the side view, aseptate, smooth-walled. Sterile cells 9–16 × 3–8 μm ( X ¯ = 12 × 5 μm, n = 30), light brown, elongate. Chlamydospores produced in chain, terminal, globose to subglobose, hyaline, smooth-walled.
Culture characteristics: colonies on PDA reaching 6.6 cm in one week at 28 ± 2 °C, floccose, sparse, concentrically spreading, forming aerial mycelia, edge irregular, surface pale brown in center, white at the edge, with punctate or flaky black spores, reverse white to pale brown with some pale brown spot, no pigment.
Material examined: China, Guangdong Province, Yangjiang City, Yongning town, 24°40′53″ N 118°41′31″ E, asymptomatic leaves of Wurfbainia villosa (Lour.) Škorničk. and A.D. Poulsen (Zingiberaceae), 1 October 2021, Chunfang Liao, (ZHKU 23-0001, holotype, dried culture); ex-type cultures ZHKUCC 23-0004, ibid., living culture ZHKUCC 23-0005.
Notes: The phylogenetic analyses showed that Ap. guangdongensis (ZHKUCC 23-0004 and ZHKUCC 23-0005) formed a sister branch to Ap. arundinis with 100% ML bootstrap support and 1.00 BYPP (Figure 1). The morphology of Ap. guangdongensis differs from Ap. arundinis by having shorter conidiogenous cells (4–9 × 2–5 μm vs. 6–12 × 3–4 μm) and larger conidia (6–9 × 5–9 μm vs. (5–)6–7 μm in the face view, 5–8 × 4–6 μm vs. 3–4 μm) [8]. The conidiogenous cells of Ap. guangdongensis are cylindrical or ampulliform, sometimes ovate or obpyriform, while they are ampulliform in Ap. arundinis. The result of the PHI test showed no significant recombination between our isolates and Ap. arundinis (Figure 3). Based on distinct morphological and molecular evidence, we propose Ap. guangdongensis as a new species.
Apiospora wurfbainiae C.F. Liao and Doilom, sp. nov. Figure 6.
Index Fungorum number: IF900355; Facesoffungi number: FoF14660.
Etymology: The epithet “Wurfbainiae” refers to the host genus Wurfbainia, from which the holotype was collected.
Endophytic in asymptomatic leaves of Wurfbainia villosa. Sexual morph: undetermined. Asexual morph: sporulated on PDA after three months, spore mass visible as black, scattered on colonies. Hyphae 1–3 μm diam. ( X ¯ = 2 μm, n = 30), branched, hyaline, septate, smooth, forming hyphal coils. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells, hyaline, smooth, branched. Conidiogenous cells 7–50 × 2–8 μm ( X ¯ = 22 × 5 μm, n = 60), holoblastic, monoblastic, discrete, hyaline, straight or curved, cylindrical to lageniform, smooth-walled. Conidia 7–9 × 5–9 μm ( X ¯ = 8 × 7 μm, n = 30) in the face view, 6–9 × 3–6 μm ( X ¯ = 7 × 4.5 μm, n = 20) in the side view, obovoid, globose to subglobose in face view, lenticular with pale equatorial slit in the side view, initially hyaline, becoming pale brown to dark brown, multi-guttulate, smooth-walled. Sterile cells 8–31 × 2–12 μm ( X ¯ = 14 × 5 μm, n = 30), light brown, elongated, cylindrical, ovate, triangular-shaped.
Culture characteristics: colonies on PDA reaching 6.8 cm in one week at 28 ± 2 °C, flatted, dense mycelium, edge regular, gray in the center, with some white globular spots from above; pale yellow to gray with some orange spots from below.
Material examined: China, Guangdong Province, Yangjiang City, Yongning town, 24°40′53″ N 118°41′31″ E, asymptomatic leaves of Wurfbainia villosa (Lour.) Škorničk. and A.D. Poulsen (Zingiberaceae), 1 October 2021, Chunfang Liao, (ZHKU 23-0003, holotype, dried culture); ex-type living culture ZHKUCC 23-0008, ibid., living culture ZHKUCC 23-0009.
Notes: Apiospora wurfbainiae shares morphological similarities to Ap. guangdongensis in having globose conidia as well as overlapping conidial size (7–9 × 5–9 μm vs. 6–9 × 5–9 μm in the face view). However, Ap. wurfbainiae has larger conidiogenous cells (7–50 × 2–8 μm vs. 4–9 × 2–5 μm) than Ap. guangdongensis. The sterile cells of Ap. wurfbainiae are elongated, cylindrical, ovate, triangular-shaped while only elongated cells were observed in Ap. guangdongensis.
In the phylogenetic analysis (Figure 1), Ap. wurfbainiae (ZHKUCC 23-0008, ZHKUCC 23-0009) form a distinct subclade which is basal to Apiospora clade with 80% ML and 1.00% BYPP. Further, this subclade is closely related to another subclade consisting of Ap. tropica, Ap. subglobosa, and Ap. neosubglobosa. Morphologically, Ap. tropica, Ap. subglobosa, and Ap. neosubglobosa were described based on their sexual morph but Ap. wurfbainiae was identified solely by its asexual morph, thus their morphological characteristics could not be compared. However, molecular evidence clearly separates Ap. wurfbainiae from other known Apiospora species. Hence, we introduce Ap. wurfbainiae as a novel species.
Apiospora yunnanensis C.F. Liao and Doilom, sp. nov. Figure 7.
Index Fungorum number: IF900358; Facesoffungi number: FoF14661.
Etymology: The epithet “yunnanensis” refers to the location, Yunnan Province, China where the holotype was collected.
Saprobic on dead stem of grass. Sexual morph: Ascostromata 750–3600 × 230–420 μm
( X ¯ = 1590 × 290 μm, n = 20), solitary to gregarious, scattered, immersed to erumpent, with the long axis broken at the top, black, ostiolate. Ascomata 75–155 × 125–245 μm ( X ¯ = 125 × 200 μm, n = 20), perithecial, immersed, pale brown to black, ampulliform to subglobose with a flattened base in cross-section, 1–2-loculate. Ostiole 35–80 μm wide ( X ¯ = 54 μm, n = 20), periphysate, central. Peridium 8–26 μm wide (( X ¯ = 17 μm, n = 50), 2–5-layered, outer layer composed of brown to dark brown, intermixed with host tissue, thick-walled, inner layer composed of hyaline, thin-walled cells of textura angularis. Hamathecium 5–13 μm wide ( X ¯ = 9 μm, n = 25), composed of hyaline, septate, unbranched paraphyses, embedded in a gelatinous matrix. Asci 70–93 × 15–23 μm ( X ¯ = 81 × 18 μm, n = 30), 8-spored, unitunicate, broadly cylindrical to clavate, apically rounded, with a pedicel. Ascospores 21–30 × 6–10 μm ( X ¯ = 23 × 8 μm, n = 50), overlapping 1–2-seriate, clavate to fusiform, 1-septate, composed of a large upper cell and small lower cell, straight to slightly curved near the lower cell, guttulate, hyaline, smooth-walled, and surrounded by a gelatinous sheath. Asexual morph: undetermined.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA reaching 6.0 cm in one week at 28 ± 2 °C, cottony in the center, dense, flat, edge mycelium spars, surface white in center, reverse white to pale brown.
Material examined: China, Yunnan Province, Kunming Institute of botanical garden, 25°02′11″ N 102°42′31″ E, dead stem of grass (Poaceae), 20 July 2019, Chunfang Liao, (ZHKU 23-0004, holotype, dried culture); ex-type living culture ZHKUCC 23-00014, ibid., living culture ZHKUCC 23-00015.
Notes: In the phylogenetic analysis, Ap. yunnanensis (ZHKUCC 23-00014, ZHKUCC 23-00015) formed a distinct branch with Ap. koreana and Ap. qinlingensis with ML = 96%, and BYPP = 0.90% (Figure 1). In comparison between ITS, tef1-α, and tub2 sequence data between our isolate (ZHKUCC 23-00014; ex-type) and Ap. koreana (KUC21332; ex-type), there were differences in 9.44% (51/540 bp), 6.85% (32/467 bp), and 9.31% (38/408 bp), respectively, while the comparison with Ap. qinlingensis (CFCC 52303; ex-type) showed differences in 13.61% (78/573 bp), 21.9% (97/442 bp), and 10.3% (52/505 bp), respectively. The LSU sequence data are currently unavailable for Ap. koreana and Ap. qinlingensis. The morphological characteristics of Ap. yunnanensis cannot be compared with those of its phylogenetically closely related species, as Ap. koreana and Ap. qinlingensis were described based on their asexual morph. While Ap. yunnanensis is currently known only from its sexual morph, attempts to sporulate its conidia on media with pine needles have been unsuccessful.
Morphologically, Ap. yunnanensis is similar to Ap. montagnei in having immersed to erumpent ascostromata, with the long axis broken at the top, broadly cylindrical to clavate asci and clavate to fusiform ascospores. However, Ap. yunnanensis is distinguished from Ap. montagnei by its shorter and wider asci (70–93 × 15–23 μm vs. 72–115 × 14–18 µm) and larger ascospores (20–30 × 6–10 μm vs. 21–25 × 6–8 µm) [15]. The comparison of LSU sequence data from our isolate Ap. yunnanensis (ZHKUCC 23-00014) with the sequences identified as Ap. montagnei ICMP 6967 and AFTOL-ID 951 in NCBI databases revealed differences of 2.24% (18/804 bp) and 2.28% (18/788 bp), respectively. We hereby propose Ap. yunnanensis as a novel species.

4. Discussion

The species diversity of Apiospora has been X ¯ expanding steadily, especially in China. To date, 40 Apiospora species have been introduced in China, including four novel species in this study [14,16,28,29,51] (Table 1). These four new species, Ap. endophytica, Ap. guangdongensis, Ap. wurfbainiae, and Ap. yunnanensis, are introduced based on morphological characteristics and multi-locus phylogenetic analyses. Based on the host diversity of Apiospora species reported by Monkai et al. [52], it was found that most Apiospora species are associated with Poaceae (63%), including bamboo (31%), non-bamboo (32%), and other plant families (27%). Our study reveals another Apiospora species, Ap. yunnanensis, which was isolated from grass (Poaceae). Furthermore, the additional three species, Ap. endophytica, Ap. guangdongensis, and Ap. wurfbainiae, have been found on W. villosa belonging to the plant family Zingiberaceae. It is likely that W. villosa harbors high Apiospora species diversity. In addition, several Apiospora species have been reported from various monocotyledon plants, including bamboos, Cordyline fruticose, grasses, and Phragmites australis [8,13,49] (this study). It suggested that monocotyledon plants may harbor a high species diversity of Apiospora species.
Our study presents an updated phylogeny for Apiospora species, which is the additional contribution of this study to the previous works. By integrating the recent literature from Pintos et al. [8], Tian et al. [16], and Phukhamsakda et al. [53] with our new collections, we recognize 93 species including four newly discovered species based on multi-locus phylogenetic analyses and morphology. However, the phylogenetic analyses of combined ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 revealed a close phylogenetic relationship between Ap. hispanica and Ap. mediterranea (Figure 1), which is consistent with the previous studies in Tian et al. [16], Monkai et al. [52], and Phukhamsakda et al. [53]. The comparison of LSU, ITS, and tub2 sequence data showed that Ap. hispanica is identical to Ap. Mediterranea; however, their tef1-α sequence data are currently unavailable in GenBank. Morphologically, Ap. hispanica is similar to Ap. mediterranea by having basauxic, macronematous, and mononematous conidiophores, but it has smaller conidia than Ap. mediterranea (7.5–8.5 × 6.2–7.6 μm vs. 9–9.5 × 7.5–9 μm) [54]. Our phylogenetic result supports the suggestion of Monkai et al. [52] that the morphological reexamination of the type specimens of Ap. hispanica and Ap. mediterranea, including their molecular data from additional genes such as tef1-α, should be investigated to confirm a putative synonymy.
In addition, Ap. marina shares a close phylogenetic affinity with Ap. paraphaeosperma and Ap. rasikravindrae, and these three species clustered sister to Ap. acutiapica and Ap. pseudorasikravindrae with 100% ML and 1.00 BYPP support (Figure 1), which is consistent with the phylogenetic result in Monkai et al. [52]. Morphologically, Ap. marina is similar to Ap. paraphaeosperma and Ap. rasikravindrae by having brown, smooth, globose to elongate conidia, but Ap. marina has smaller conidia than Ap. paraphaeosperma (9.5–)10–12 (−13) × (7.5–)8.0–10 μm vs. 10–19 μm diam.), and Ap. rasikravindrae (9.5–)10–12 (−13) × (7.5–)8.0–10 vs. 10−15 × 6.0−10.5 μm) (Supplementary Table S1). Regarding the aforementioned factors, we suggest that the species boundaries of these ambiguous species should be re-evaluated to confirm the taxonomic status and to facilitate the identification of species grouped in this clade, and that tef1-α and tub2 sequence data from the ex-type of Ap. rasikravindrae (NFCCI 2144) are required. Additionally, there are 41 morphospecies (species without molecular data) listed under Apiospora (Supplementary Table S2). Pintos and Alvarado [15] examined the lectotype for Sphaeria apiospora (=Ap. montagnei, type species of Apiospora) specimens preserved at the PC fungarium, which were collected from Poaceae in lowland Mediterranean habitats. The taxonomic status of the remaining taxa, lacking sequence information and comprehensive morphological descriptions, remains uncertain and requires further investigation.
In this study, we compiled the available information on the sexual/ asexual morph of Apiospora species, including their known lifestyle from the relevant literature (Table 1). According to these data, 12 species have only been reported in their sexual morphs, while 63 species are known solely by their asexual morphs. Additionally, 19 species have been described in both sexual and asexual morphs. The prevalence of Apiospora species is likely to be associated with their asexual morph occurring as saprobic and endophytic lifestyles. On the other hand, the sexual morph is commonly observed from saprobic isolates thus far. Moreover, some Apiospora species have been reported in several lifestyles. For example, Ap. arundinis, Ap. hydei, Ap. thailandica, and Ap. yunnana have been reported in both saprobes and endophytes [8,25,55]. In addition, Ap. arundinis has been known as a saprobe, endophyte and pathogen [56]. The investigation into the potential transition of endophytic or saprobic of Apiospora to alternative lifestyles, such as becoming pathogens, is crucial for understanding their ecological role.
In view of the biological applications, many species of Apiospora produce an interesting bioactive secondary metabolite which could be a promising source of pharmacological and medicinal applications. For instance, a saprobic isolate of Ap. chromolaenae showed antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli [57]. Apiospora saccharicola and Ap. sacchari isolated from Miscanthus sp. are known to produce industrially important enzymes [58]. Apiospora arundinis and Ap. saccharicola isolated from a brown alga Sargassum sp. produce antimicrobial substances that can inhibit some plant pathogenic fungi [59]. The endophytic Ap. rasikravindrae was isolated from the stem of Coleus amboinicus, which produces a compound with strong antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities [60]. Eijk [61] reported that Ap. sphaerosperma produced a tetrahydroxy anthraquinone pigment and other metabolites, such as ergosterol, succinic acid, and phenolic compounds C18O5. Li et al. [62] conducted whole-genome sequencing of Ap. sphaerosperma and revealed the potential of Ap. sphaerosperma AP-Z13 to synthesize various secondary metabolites based on transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics analyses. However, many novel Apiospora species, including new species in this study, are untapped natural resources and only Ap. sphaerosperma has been the subject of whole-gene sequencing and omics research [62]. The future necessitates further metabolomics analyses to investigate the biological applications of both known and newly discovered Apiospora species, in order to comprehensively explore their biological properties.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof9111087/s1, Supplementary Table S1. Synopsis of morphological characteristics of Ap. marina and its closely related species. Supplementary Table S2. Morphospecies of Apiospora. All data availability was mentioned in the manuscript. The novel taxa were registered in Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp, accessed on 26 June 2023) including Index Fungorum numbers IF900357, IF900356, IF900355, IF900358. Final alignment and phylogenetic tree were deposited in TreeBase (https://www.treebase. org/, accessed on 16 October 2023) with submission ID: 30849) and the newly generated sequences were deposited in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/submit/, accessed on 26 June 2023) followed as ITS: OQ587994, OQ587995, OQ587996, OQ587997, OQ587998, OQ587999, OQ588000, OQ588001, OQ588002, OQ588003, OQ588004, OQ588005; LSU: OQ587982, OQ587983, OQ587984, OQ587985, OQ587986, OQ587987, OQ587988, OQ587989, OQ587990, OQ587991, OQ587992, OQ587993; tub2: OQ586060, OQ586061, OQ586062, OQ586063, OQ586064, OQ586065, OQ586066, OQ586067, OQ586068, OQ586069, OQ586070, OQ586071; tef1-α: OQ586073, OQ586074, OQ586075, OQ586076, OQ586077, OQ586078, OQ586079, OQ586080, OQ586081, OQ586082, OQ586083, OQ586084.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.L. and M.D.; methodology, C.L.; software, C.L., M.D., I.C.S., K.T. and M.D.; formal analysis, C.L.; investigation, I.C.S.; resources, M.D.; data curation, C.L.; writing—original draft preparation, C.L.; writing—review and editing, C.L., M.D., I.C.S., K.T., W.D., Y.Z. and M.D.; visualization, M.D.; supervision, W.D.; project administration, K.W.T.C.; funding acquisition, M.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Science and Technology Bureau of Guangzhou City (grant numbers 2023A04J1425 and 2023A04J1426), Guangdong University Key Laboratory for Sustainable Control of Fruit and Vegetable Diseases and Pests (grant number KA21031C502), the High-level Talents in Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering (grant number J2201080102), the Starting Research Fund from Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (grant number KA22016B746), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 32200015), and the Innovative team program of the Department of Education of Guangdong Province (grant numbers 2022KCXTD015 and 2022ZDJS020).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to Shaun Pennycook (Landcare Research, New Zealand) for his critical nomenclatural review. We would also like to thank Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering and Mae Fah Luang University for providing research facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Phookamsak, R.; Liu, J.K.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Manamgoda, D.S.; Ariyawansa, H.; Thambugala, K.M.; Dai, D.Q.; Camporesi, E.; Chukeatirote, E.; Wijayawardene, N.N.; et al. Revision of Phaeosphaeriaceae. Fungal Divers. 2014, 68, 159–238. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hongsanan, S.; Li, Y.M.; Liu, J.K.; Hofmann, T.; Piepenbring, M.; Bhat, D.J.; Boonmee, S.; Doilom, M.; Singtripop, C.; Tian, Q.; et al. Revision of genera in Asterinales. Fungal Divers. 2014, 68, 1–68. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tanaka, K.; Hirayama, K.; Yonezawa, H.; Sato, G.; Toriyabe, A.; Kudo, H.; Hashimoto, A.; Matsumura, M.; Harada, Y.; Kurihara, Y.; et al. Revision of the Massarineae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes). Stud. Mycol. 2015, 82, 75–136. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Pem, D.; Jeewon, R.; Chethana, K.W.T.; Hongsanan, S.; Doilom, M.; Suwannarach, N.; Hyde, K.D. Species concepts of Dothideomycetes: Classification, phylogenetic inconsistencies and taxonomic standardization. Fungal Divers. 2021, 109, 283–319. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wijayawardene, N.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Dai, D.Q.; Sánchez-García, M.; Goto, B.T.; Saxena, R.K.; Erdoğdu, M.; Selçuk, F.; Rajeshkumar, K.C.; Aptroot, A.; et al. Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa–2021. Mycosphere 2022, 13, 53–453. [Google Scholar]
  6. Saccardo, P. Conspectus generum pyrenomycetum italicorum additis speciebus fungorum Venetorum novisvel criticis, systemate carpologico dispositorum. Atti della Societa Veneziana-Trentina-Istrianadi. Scienze Naturali 1875, 4, 77–100. [Google Scholar]
  7. Clements, F.E.; Shear, C.L. The genera of Fungi; H.W. Wilson Company publishing: New York, USA, 1931; pp. 1–496. [Google Scholar]
  8. Crous, P.W.; Groenewald, J.Z. A phylogenetic reevaluation of Arthrinium. IMA Fungus 2013, 4, 133–154. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pintos, Á.; Alvarado, P.; Planas, J.; Jarling, R. Six new species of Arthrinium from Europe and notes about A. caricicola and other species found in Carex spp. hosts. MycoKeys 2019, 49, 15–48. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hawksworth, D.L.; Crous, P.W.; Redhead, S.A.; Reynolds, D.R.; Samson, R.A.; Seifert, K.A.; Zhang, N. The Amsterdam declaration on fungal nomenclature. IMA Fungus 2011, 2, 105–112. [Google Scholar]
  11. Réblová, M.; Miller, A.N.; Rossman, A.Y.; Seifert, K.A.; Crous, P.W.; Hawksworth, D.L.; Abdel-Wahab, M.A.; Cannon, P.F.; Daranagama, D.A.; De Beer, Z.W.; et al. Recommendations for competing sexual-asexually typified generic names in Sordariomycetes (except Diaporthales, Hypocreales, and Magnaporthales). IMA Fungus 2016, 7, 131–153. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, M.; Tan, X.M.; Liu, F.; Cai, L. Eight new Arthrinium species from China. MycoKeys 2018, 34, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jiang, N.; Liang, Y.M.; Tian, C.M. A novel bambusicolous fungus from China, Arthrinium chinense (Xylariales). Sydowia 2020, 72, 77–83. [Google Scholar]
  14. Feng, Y.; Liu, J.K.; Lin, C.G.; Chen, Y.Y.; Xiang, M.M.; Liu, Z.Y. Additions to the genus Arthrinium (Apiosporaceae) from bamboos in China. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 7, 661281. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pintos, Á.; Alvarado, P. Phylogenetic delimitation of Apiospora and Arthrinium. Fungal Syst. Evol. 2021, 7, 197–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tian, X.G.; Karunarathna, S.C.; Mapook, A.; Promputtha, I.; Xu, J.; Bao, D.; Tibpromma, S. One new species and two new host records of Apiospora from bamboo and maize in northern Thailand with thirteen new combinations. Life 2021, 11, 1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Index Fungorum. Available online: http://www.indexfungorum.org (accessed on 17 October 2023).
  18. Kwon, S.L.; Cho, M.; Lee, Y.M.; Kim, C.; Lee, S.M.; Ahn, B.J.; Lee, H.; Kim, J.J. Two unrecorded Apiospora species isolated from marine substrates in Korea with eight new combinations (A. piptatheri and A. rasikravindrae). Mycobiology 2022, 50, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ji, Z.L.; Zhang, S.W.; Zhu, F.; Wan, B.X.; Liang, R.Z. First report of Arthrinium arundinis causing leaf edge spot of peach in China. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 3077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, K.; Wu, X.Q.; Huang, M.X.; Han, Y.Y. First report of brown culm streak of Phyllostachys praecox caused by Arthrinium arundinis in Nanjing, China. Plant Dis. 2014, 98, 1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mavragani, D.C.; Abdellatif, L.; McConkey, B.; Hamel, C.; Vujanovic, V. First report of damping-off of durum wheat caused by Arthrinium sacchari in the semi-arid Saskatchewan fields. Plant Dis. 2007, 91, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, B.J.; Liu, P.Q.; Jiang, Y.; Weng, Q.Y.; Chen, Q.H. First report of culm rot caused by Arthrinium phaeospermum on Phyllostachys viridis in China. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dyląg, M.; Hryncewicz-Gwóźdź, A.; Jagielski, T. Onychomycosis due to Arthrinium arundinis: A case report. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2017, 97, 860–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ma, X.; Chomnunti, P.; Doilom, M.; Daranagama, D.A.; Kang, J. Multigene phylogeny reveals endophytic Xylariales novelties from Dendrobium species from Southwestern China and Northern Thailand. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dai, D.Q.; Phookamsak, R.; Wijayawardene, N.N.; Li, W.J.; Bhat, D.J.; Xu, J.C.; Taylor, J.E.; Hyde, K.D.; Chukeatirote, E. Bambusicolous fungi. Fungal Divers. 2017, 82, 1–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, H.; Umeokoli, B.O.; Eze, P.; Heering, C.; Janiak, C.; Müller, W.E.; Orfali, R.S.; Hartmann, R.; Dai, H.; Lin, W.; et al. Secondary metabolites of the lichen-associated fungus Apiospora montagnei. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017, 58, 1702–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hyde, K.D.; Norphanphoun, C.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Bhat, D.J.; Jones, E.B.G.; Bundhun, D.; Chen, Y.J.; Bao, D.F.; Boonmee, S.; Calabon, M.S.; et al. Refined families of Sordariomycetes. Mycosphere 2020, 11, 305–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Senanayake, I.C.; Rathnayaka, A.R.; Marasinghe, D.S.; Calabon, M.S.; Gentekaki, E.; Lee, H.B.; Hurdeal, V.G.; Pem, D.; Dissanayake, L.S.; Wijesinghe, S.N.; et al. Morphological approaches in studying fungi: Collection, examination, isolation, sporulation and preservation. Mycosphere 2020, 11, 2678–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jiang, N.; Tian, C.M. The holomorph of Arthrinium setariae sp. nov. (Apiosporaceae, Xylariales) from China. Phytotaxa 2021, 483, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jeewon, R.; Hyde, K.D. Establishing species boundaries and new taxa among fungi: Recommendations to resolve taxonomic ambiguities. Mycosphere 2016, 7, 1669–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Chen, Y.; Ariyawansa, H.A.; Hyde, K.D.; Haelewaters, D.; Perera, R.H.; Samarakoon, M.C.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Bustamante, D.E.; Liu, J.K.; et al. Integrative approaches for species delimitation in Ascomycota. Fungal Divers. 2021, 109, 155–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jayasiri, S.C.; Hyde, K.D.; Ariyawansa, H.A.; Bhat, D.J.; Buyck, B.; Cai, L.; Dai, Y.C.; Abd-Elsalam, K.A.; Ertz, D.; Hidayat, I.; et al. The faces of fungi database: Fungal names linked with morphology, phylogeny and human impacts. Fungal Divers. 2015, 74, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chaiwan, N.; Gomdola, D.; Wang, S.; Monkai, J.; Tibpromma, S.; Doilom, M.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Mortimer, P.E.; Lumyong, S.; Hyde, K.D. https://gmsmicrofungi.org: An online database providing updated information of microfungi in the Greater Mekong Subregion. Mycosphere 2021, 12, 1513–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990; Volume 18, p. 7. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gardes, M.; Bruns, T.D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes-application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol. 1993, 2, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Vilgalys, R.; Hester, M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 4238–4246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Glass, N.L.; Donaldson, G.C. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 1323–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. O’Donnell, K.; Kistler, H.C.; Cigelnik, E.; Ploetz, R.C. Multiple evolutionary origins of the fungus causing Panama disease of banana: Concordant evidence from nuclear and mitochondrial gene genealogies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 2044–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Carbone, I.; Kohn, L.M. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 1999, 91, 553–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. GenBank. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/ (accessed on 17 October 2023).
  41. Hall, T. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. In Proceedings of the Nucleic Acids Symposium Series, London, UK, 8–12 October 1999; pp. 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  42. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Miller, M.; Pfeiffer, W.; Schwartz, T. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop, New Orleans, LA, USA, 21 November 2010; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  44. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Huelsenbeck, J.P.; Ronquist, F. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 2001, 17, 754–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rambaut, A. FigTree v1.4: Tree Figure Drawing Tool. Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (accessed on 17 October 2023).
  47. Philippe, H.; Bryant, D. A simple and robust statistical test for detecting the presence of recombination. Genetics 2006, 172, 2665–2681. [Google Scholar]
  48. Huson, D.H.; Bryant, D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 23, 254–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Chen, T.Z.; Zhang, Y.; Ming, X.B.; Zhang, Q.; Long, H.; Hyde, K.D.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y. Morphological and phylogenetic resolution of Arthrinium from medicinal plants in Yunnan, including A. cordylines and A. pseudomarii spp. nov. Mycotaxon 2021, 136, 183–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Calvo, M.A.; Guarro, J. Arthrinium aureum sp. nov. from Spain. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1980, 75, 156–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yang, C.L.; Xu, X.L.; Dong, W.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Liu, Y.G.; Hyde, K.D. Introducing Arthrinium phyllostachium sp. nov. (Apiosporaceae, Xylariales) on Phyllostachys heteroclada from Sichuan province, China. Phytotaxa 2019, 406, 91–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Monkai, J.; Phookamsak, R.; Tennakoon, D.S.; Bhat, D.J.; Xu, S.; Li, Q.; Xu, J.; Mortimer, P.E.; Kumla, J.; Lumyong, S. Insight into the taxonomic resolution of Apiospora: Introducing novel species and records from bamboo in China and Thailand. Diversity 2022, 14, 918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Phukhamsakda, C.; Nilsson, R.H.; Bhunjun, C.S.; de Farias, A.R.; Sun, Y.R.; Wijesinghe, S.N.; Raza, M.; Bao, D.F.; Lu, L.; Tibpromma, S.; et al. The numbers of fungi: Contributions from traditional taxonomic studies and challenges of metabarcoding. Fungal Divers. 2022, 114, 1–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Larrondo, J.V.; Calvo, M.A. New contributions to the study of the genus Arthrinium. Mycologia 1992, 84, 475–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zeng, Y.; Ali, M.K.; He, W.; Deng, L.; Yang, X.; Li, X.; Pu, X.; Yang, J. Chemical constituents of functional food Amomum villosum to combat human diseases. Curr. Chin. Sci. 2022, 2, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bon, M.C.; Goolsby, J.A.; Mercadier, G.; Guermache, F.; Kashefi, J.; Cristofaro, M.; Vacek, A.T.; Kirk, A. Detection of a diverse endophyte assemblage within fungal communities associated with the Arundo Leaf Miner, Lasioptera donacis (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Diversity 2023, 15, 571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mapook, A.; Hyde, K.D.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Jones, E.B.G.; Bhat, D.J.; Jeewon, R.; Stadler, M.; Samarakoon, M.C.; Malaithong, M.; Tanunchai, B.; et al. Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungi associated with the invasive weed Chromolaena odorata (Siam weed). Fungal Divers. 2020, 101, 1–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shrestha, P.; Ibáñez, A.B.; Bauer, S.; Glassman, S.I.; Szaro, T.M.; Bruns, T.D.; Taylor, J.W. Fungi isolated from Miscanthus and sugarcane: Biomass conversion, fungal enzymes, and hydrolysis of plant cell wall polymers. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2015, 8, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Hong, J.H.; Jang, S.; Heo, Y.M.; Min, M.; Lee, H.; Lee, Y.M.; Lee, H.; Kim, J.J. Investigation of marine-derived fungal diversity and their exploitable biological activities. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 4137–4155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Astuti, P.; Pratoko, D.K.; Rollando, R.; Nugroho, G.W.; Wahyuono, S.; Hertiani, T.; Nurrochmad, A. Bioactivities of A Major Compound from Arthrinium rasikravindrae an endophytic fungus of Coleus amboinicus. Lour. Fabad J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 46, 23–30. [Google Scholar]
  61. van Eijk, G.W. Bostrycin, a tetrahydroanthraquinone pigment and some other metabolites from the fungus Arthrinium phaeospermum. Experientia 1975, 31, 783–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, S.; Tang, Y.; Fang, X.; Qiao, T.; Han, S.; Zhu, T. Whole-genome sequence of Arthrinium phaeospermum, a globally distributed pathogenic fungus. Genomics 2020, 112, 919–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis (RAxML) of genera in Apiosporaceae based on ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 sequence data. Maximum likelihood bootstrap values equal or above 75%, and Bayesian posterior probabilities equal or above 0.90 (ML/BYPP) are given at the nodes. A strain number is noted after the species name. The tree is rooted with Sporocadus trimorphus (CFCC 55171) and (ROC 113). Hyphen (-) represents support values below 75% ML and 0.90 BYPP. The ex-type strains are bolded black, and the new isolates are in blue.
Figure 1. Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis (RAxML) of genera in Apiosporaceae based on ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 sequence data. Maximum likelihood bootstrap values equal or above 75%, and Bayesian posterior probabilities equal or above 0.90 (ML/BYPP) are given at the nodes. A strain number is noted after the species name. The tree is rooted with Sporocadus trimorphus (CFCC 55171) and (ROC 113). Hyphen (-) represents support values below 75% ML and 0.90 BYPP. The ex-type strains are bolded black, and the new isolates are in blue.
Jof 09 01087 g001aJof 09 01087 g001bJof 09 01087 g001c
Figure 2. Split graph showing the results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of the combined ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 sequence data between Apiospora endophytica (ZHKU 23-0006, ZHKU 23-0007) with three closely related taxa of A. aurea CBS 244.83, A. hydei CBS 114990, and A. cordylies GUCC 10026 using LogDet transformation and splits decomposition. PHI test result (Φw) = 0.06901 indicates no significant recombination within the dataset (Φw > 0.05). The generated sequences are indicated in blue.
Figure 2. Split graph showing the results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of the combined ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 sequence data between Apiospora endophytica (ZHKU 23-0006, ZHKU 23-0007) with three closely related taxa of A. aurea CBS 244.83, A. hydei CBS 114990, and A. cordylies GUCC 10026 using LogDet transformation and splits decomposition. PHI test result (Φw) = 0.06901 indicates no significant recombination within the dataset (Φw > 0.05). The generated sequences are indicated in blue.
Jof 09 01087 g002
Figure 3. Split graph showing the results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of the combined ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 sequence data between Apiospora guangdongensis (ZHKUCC 23-0004, ZHKUCC 23-0005) with the closely related taxa of A. arundinis (CBS 449.92, CBS 133509) using LogDet transformation and splits decomposition. PHI test result (Φw) = 1.00 indicates no significant recombination within the dataset (Φw > 0.05). The generated sequences are indicated in blue.
Figure 3. Split graph showing the results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of the combined ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 sequence data between Apiospora guangdongensis (ZHKUCC 23-0004, ZHKUCC 23-0005) with the closely related taxa of A. arundinis (CBS 449.92, CBS 133509) using LogDet transformation and splits decomposition. PHI test result (Φw) = 1.00 indicates no significant recombination within the dataset (Φw > 0.05). The generated sequences are indicated in blue.
Jof 09 01087 g003
Figure 4. Apiospora endophytica (ZHKU 23-0002, holotype). (a) Upper view and reverse view of culture on PDA. (b,c) Conidia on aerial mycelia on PDA. (dh) Conidiophores with conidiogenous cells. (im) Conidia in the face view. (n) Conidia with germ-slit. Scale bars in (dn) = 10 μm.
Figure 4. Apiospora endophytica (ZHKU 23-0002, holotype). (a) Upper view and reverse view of culture on PDA. (b,c) Conidia on aerial mycelia on PDA. (dh) Conidiophores with conidiogenous cells. (im) Conidia in the face view. (n) Conidia with germ-slit. Scale bars in (dn) = 10 μm.
Jof 09 01087 g004
Figure 5. Apiospora guangdongensis (ZHKU 23-0001, holotype). (a) Upper view and reverse view of culture on PDA. (b,c) Conidia on aerial mycelia on PDA. (d,e) Mycelium. (f,g) Chlamydospores. (hl) Conidiophores with conidiogenous cells. (mp) Conidia in the face view. (q) Elongated conidia (sterile cells). (r) Conidia with germ-slit (arrows). Scale bars in (dr) = 10 μm.
Figure 5. Apiospora guangdongensis (ZHKU 23-0001, holotype). (a) Upper view and reverse view of culture on PDA. (b,c) Conidia on aerial mycelia on PDA. (d,e) Mycelium. (f,g) Chlamydospores. (hl) Conidiophores with conidiogenous cells. (mp) Conidia in the face view. (q) Elongated conidia (sterile cells). (r) Conidia with germ-slit (arrows). Scale bars in (dr) = 10 μm.
Jof 09 01087 g005
Figure 6. Apiospora wurfbainiae (ZHKU 23-0003, holotype). (a) Upper view and reverse view of culture on PDA. (b,c) Conidia on aerial mycelia on PDA. (dg) Conidia with conidiogenous cells. (dj) Conidia. (k) Conidia in the side view with germ-slit (arrows). (ln) Sterile cells. (o,p) Sterile cell with conidia. Scale bars in (dp) = 10 μm.
Figure 6. Apiospora wurfbainiae (ZHKU 23-0003, holotype). (a) Upper view and reverse view of culture on PDA. (b,c) Conidia on aerial mycelia on PDA. (dg) Conidia with conidiogenous cells. (dj) Conidia. (k) Conidia in the side view with germ-slit (arrows). (ln) Sterile cells. (o,p) Sterile cell with conidia. Scale bars in (dp) = 10 μm.
Jof 09 01087 g006
Figure 7. Apiospora yunnanensis (ZHKU 23-0004, holotype). (a,b) Appearance of ascomata on substrate. (c) Vertical section through ascoma. (d) Peridium. (e) Peridium at the top. (f) Peridium at the base. (g) Hamathecium with asci. (h) Hamathecium. (ik) Asci. (ln) Ascospores. (o) Ascospore in Indian Ink. (p) Germinated ascospore. (q) Culture characteristics on PDA (left-front, right-reverse). Scale bars in (ck) = 20 μm, (ip) = 10 μm.
Figure 7. Apiospora yunnanensis (ZHKU 23-0004, holotype). (a,b) Appearance of ascomata on substrate. (c) Vertical section through ascoma. (d) Peridium. (e) Peridium at the top. (f) Peridium at the base. (g) Hamathecium with asci. (h) Hamathecium. (ik) Asci. (ln) Ascospores. (o) Ascospore in Indian Ink. (p) Germinated ascospore. (q) Culture characteristics on PDA (left-front, right-reverse). Scale bars in (ck) = 20 μm, (ip) = 10 μm.
Jof 09 01087 g007
Table 1. Details of taxa including their GenBank accession numbers used in the phylogenetic analyses of this study.
Table 1. Details of taxa including their GenBank accession numbers used in the phylogenetic analyses of this study.
Taxa Strain NumbersSubstratesKnown LifestylesCountriesGenBank Accession Numbers
ITSLSUtub2tef1-α
Apiospora acutiapicaKUMCC 20-0210Bambusa bambosSaprobeChinaMT946343MT946339MT947366MT947360
Ap. agariKUC21333TAgarum cribrosumNot mentionedRepublic of KoreaMH498520-MH498478MH544663
Ap. agariKUC21361Agarum cribrosumNot mentionedRepublic of KoreaMH498519-MH498477MN868914
Ap. aquaticaS-642Submerged woodSaprobeChinaMK828608MK835806--
Ap. arctoscopiKUC21331TEgg of Arctoscopus japonicusNot mentionedRepublic of KoreaMH498529-MH498487MN868918
Ap. arctoscopiKUC21344Egg of Arctoscopus japonicusNot mentionedRepublic of KoreaMH498528-MH498486MN868919
Ap. arundinisCBS 133509Aspergillus flavus sclerotiumSaprobe/endophyteUSAKF144886KF144930KF144976KF145018
Ap. arundinisCBS 449.92Aspergillus flavus sclerotiumSaprobe/endophyteUSAKF144887KF144931KF144977KF145019
Ap. aureaCBS 244.83T-SaprobeJapanAB220251KF144935KF144981KF145023
Ap. balearicaCBS 145129TUndetermined PoaceaeSaprobeSpainMK014869MK014836MK017975MK017946
Ap. bambusicolaMFLUCC 20-0144TSchizostachyum brachycladumSaprobeThailandMW173030MW173087-MW183262
Ap. biserialisCGMCC 3.20135TBambooSaprobeChinaMW481708MW478885MW522955MW522938
Ap. biserialisGZCC 20-0099BambooSaprobeChinaMW481709MW478886MW522956MW522939
Ap. biserialisGZCC 20-0100BambooSaprobeChinaMW481710MW478887MW522957MW522940
Ap. camelliae-sinensisLC 5007TCamellia sinensisEndophyteChinaKY494704KY494780KY705173KY705103
Ap. camelliae-sinensisLC 8181Camellia sinensisEndophyteChinaKY494761KY494837KY705229KY705157
Ap. chiangraienseMFLUCC 21-0053TDead culms of bambooSaprobeThailandMZ542520MZ542524MZ546409-
Ap. chromolaenaeMFLUCC 17-1505TChromolaena odorataSaprobeThailandMT214342MT214436-MT235802
Ap. cordylinesGUCC 10026Cordyline fruticosaNot mentionedChinaMT040105-MT040147MT040126
Ap. cyclobalanopsidisCGMCC 3.20136TCyclobalanopsidis glaucaSaprobeChinaMW481713MW478892MW522962MW522945
Ap. cyclobalanopsidisGZCC 20-0103Cyclobalanopsidis glaucaSaprobeChinaMW481714MW478893MW522963MW522946
Ap. descalsiiCBS 145130TAmpelodesmos mauritanicusSaprobeSpainMK014870MK014837MK017976MK017947
Ap. dichotomanthiLC 4950TDichotomanthes tristaniicarpaSaprobe/endophyteChinaKY494697KY494773KY705167KY705096
Ap. dichotomanthiLC 8175Dichotomanthes tristaniicarpaSaprobe/endophyteChinaKY494755KY494831KY705223KY705151
Ap. dongyingensisSAUCC 0302TLeaf of bambooPathogenChinaOP563375OP572424OP573270OP573264
Ap. dongyingensisSAUCC 0303Leaf of bambooPathogenChinaOP563374OP572423OP573263OP573269
Ap. endophyticaZHKUCC 23-0006TWurfbainia villosaEndophyteChinaOQ587996OQ587984OQ586062OQ586075
Ap. endophytica ZHKUCC 23-0007Wurfbainia villosaEndophyteChinaOQ587997OQ587985OQ586063OQ586076
Ap. esporlensisCBS 145136TPhyllostachys aureaSaprobeSpainMK014878MK014845MK017983MK017954
Ap. euphorbiaeIMI 285638bBambusa sp.SaprobeBangladeshAB220241AB220335AB220288-
Ap. fermentiKUC21289TSeaweedNot mentionedRepublic of KoreaMF615226-MF615231MH544667
Ap. fermentiKUC21288SeaweedNot mentionedRepublic of KoreaMF615230-MF615235MH544668
Ap. gaoyouensisCFCC 52301TPhragmites australisSaprobeChinaMH197124-MH236789MH236793
Ap. gaoyouensisCFCC 52302Phragmites australisSaprobeChinaMH197125-MH236790MH236794
Ap. garethjonesiiKUMCC 16-0202TDead culms of bambooSaprobeChinaKY356086KY356091--
Ap. gelatinosaKHAS 11962TBambooSaprobeChinaMW481706MW478888MW522958MW522941
Ap. gelatinosaGZAAS 20-0107BambooSaprobeChinaMW481707MW478889MW522959MW522942
Ap. guangdongensisZHKUCC 23-0004TWurfbainia villosaEndophyteChinaOQ587994OQ587982OQ586060OQ586073
Ap. guangdongensisZHKUCC 23-0005Wurfbainia villosaEndophyteChinaOQ587995OQ587983OQ586061OQ586074
Ap. guiyangensisHKAS 102403TUnidentified grassSaprobeChinaMW240647MW240577MW775604MW759535
Ap. guizhouensisLC 5318Air in karst cave, bambooAirborne/endophyteChinaKY494708KY494784KY705177KY705107
Ap. guizhouensisLC 5322TAir in karst cave, bambooAirborne/endophyteChinaKY494709KY494785KY705178KY705108
Ap. hainanensisSAUCC 1681TLeaf of bambooPathogenChinaOP563373 OP572422OP573268OP573262
Ap. hainanensisSAUCC 1682Leaf of bambooPathogenChinaOP563372 OP572421 OP573267OP573261
Ap. hispanicaIMI 326877TBeach sandSaprobeSpainAB220242AB220336AB220289-
Ap. hydeiCBS 114990TCulms of Bambusa tuldoidesSaprobeHong Kong, ChinaKF144890KF144936KF144982KF145024
Ap. hydeiKUMCC 16-0204Bambusa tuldoidesSaprobeChinaKY356087KY356092--
Ap. hyphopodiiMFLUCC 15-0003TBambusa tuldoidesSaprobeChinaKR069110---
Ap. hyphopodiiKUMCC 16-0201Bambusa tuldoidesSaprobeChinaKY356088KY356093--
Ap. hysterinaICPM 6889TBambooSaprobeNew ZealandMK014874MK014841MK017980MK017951
Ap. hysterinaCBS 145133BambooSaprobeNew ZealandMK014875MK014842MK017981MK017952
Ap. ibericaCBS 145137TArundo donaxSaprobePortugalMK014879MK014846MK017984MK017955
Ap. intestiniCBS 135835TGut of a grasshopperSaprobeIndiaKR011352MH877577KR011350KR011351
Ap. intestiniMFLUCC 21-0052Gut of a grasshopperSaprobeIndiaMZ542521MZ542525MZ546410MZ546406
Ap. italicaCBS 145138TArundo donaxSaprobeItalyMK014880MK014847MK017985MK017956
Ap. italicaCBS 145139Arundo donaxSaprobeItalyMK014881MK014848MK017986-
Ap. jatrophaeAMH-9557TJatropha podagricaSaprobeIndiaJQ246355---
Ap. jatrophaeAMH-9556Jatropha podagricaSaprobeIndiaHE981191---
Ap. jiangxiensisLC 4494Maesa sp.EndophyteChinaKY494690KY494766KY705160KY705089
Ap. jiangxiensisLC 4577TMaesa sp.EndophyteChinaKY494693KY494769KY705163KY705092
Ap. kogelbergensisCBS 113332Dead culms of RestionaceaeSaprobeSouth AfricaKF144891KF144937KF144983KF145025
Ap. kogelbergensisCBS 113333TDead culms of RestionaceaeSaprobeSouth AfricaKF144892KF144938KF144984KF145026
Ap. koreanaKUC21332TEgg of Arctoscopus japonicusNot mentionedRepublic of KoreaMH498524-MH498482MH544664
Ap. koreanaKUC21348Egg of Arctoscopus japonicusNot mentionedRepublic of KoreaMH498523-MH498481MN868927
Ap. lageniformisKUC21686TBranch of Phyllostachys pubescensNot mentionedRepublic of Korea ON764022ON787761ON806636ON806626
Ap. lageniformisKUC21687Branch of Phyllostachys pubescensNot mentionedRepublic of Korea ON764023ON787762ON806637ON806627
Ap. locuta-pollinisLC 11688Brassica campestrisSaprobeChinaMF939596-MF939623MF939618
Ap. locuta-pollinisLC 11683TBrassica campestrisSaprobeChinaMF939595-MF939622MF939616
Ap. longistromaMFLUCC 11-0479Dead culms of bambooSaprobeThailandKU940142KU863130--
Ap. longistromaMFLUCC
11-0481T
Dead culms of bambooSaprobeThailandKU940141KU863129--
Ap. magnisporaZHKUCC 22-0001 Bamboo SaprobeChinaOM728647 OM486971 OM0543544OM543543
Ap. malaysianaCBS 102053TMacaranga hullettiiSaprobeMalaysiaKF144896KF144942KF144988KF145030
Ap. marianiaeCBS 148710TPhleum pratenseSaprobeSpainNR_183001NG_149092 -
Ap. marianiaeAP301119Phleum pratenseSaprobeSpainON692407ON692423ON677187ON677181
Ap. mariiCBS 497.90TBeach sandsSaprobeSpainAB220252KF144947KF144993KF145035
Ap. mariiDiSSPA_A1Beach sandsSaprobeSpainMK602320-MK614695MK645472
Ap. marinaKUC21328TSeaweedNot mentionedRepublic of KoreaMH498538-MH498496MH544669
Ap. marinaKUC21353SeaweedNot mentionedRepublic of KoreaMH498537-MH498495MN868923
Ap. mediterraneaIMI 326875TAirSaprobeSpainAB220243AB220337AB220290-
Ap. minutispora1.70-41Mountain soilSoilRepublic of KoreaLC517882-LC518888LC518889
Ap. moriMFLUCC 20-0181TMorus australisSaprobeTaiwanMW114313MW114393--
Ap. moriNCYUCC 19-034Morus australisSaprobeTaiwanMW114314MW114394--
Ap. mukdahanensisMFLUCC 22-0056Tdead bamboo leaveSaprobeThailandOP377735OP377742-OP381089
Ap. multiloculataMFLUCC 21-0023TDead bambooSaprobeThailandOL873137OL873138--
Ap. mytilomorphaDAOM 214595TAndropogon sp.SaprobeIndiaKY494685---
Ap. neobambusaeLC 7106TLeaves of bambooSaprobe/endophyteChinaKY494718KY494794KY705186KY806204
Ap. neobambusaeLC 7124Leaves of bambooSaprobe/endophyteChinaKY494727KY494803KY705195KY806206
Ap. neochinensisCFCC 53036TFargesia qinlingensisSaprobeChinaMK819291-MK818547MK818545
Ap. neochinensisCFCC 53037Fargesia qinlingensisSaprobeChinaMK819292-MK818548MK818546
Ap. neogarethjonesiiKUMCC 18-0192BambooSaprobeChinaMK070897MK070898--
Ap. neosubglobosaJHB 006BambooSaprobeChinaKY356089KY356094--
Ap. neosubglobosaKUMCC 16-0203TBambooSaprobeChinaKY356090KY356095--
Ap. obovataLC 4940TLithocarpus sp.EndophyteChinaKY494696KY494772KY705166KY705095
Ap. obovataLC 8177Lithocarpus sp.EndophyteChinaKY494757KY494833KY705225KY705153
Ap. ovataCBS 115042TArundinaria hindsiiSaprobeChinaKF144903KF144950KF144995KF145037
Ap. paraphaeospermaMFLUCC 13-0644TDead culms of bambooSaprobeThailandKX822128KX822124--
Ap. phragmitisCPC 18900TPhragmites australisSaprobeItalyKF144909KF144956KF145001KF145043
Ap. phyllostachydisMFLUCC 18-1101TPhyllostachys heterocladaSaprobeChinaMK351842MH368077MK291949MK340918
Ap. piptatheriCBS 145149TPiptatherum miliaceumSaprobeSpainMK014893MK014860-MK017969
Ap. pseudohyphopodiiKUC21680TCulm of Phyllostachys pubescensNot mentionedRepublic of Korea ON764026ON787765ON806640ON806630
Ap. pseudohyphopodiiKUC21684Culm of Phyllostachys pubescensNot mentionedRepublic of Korea ON764027ON787766ON806641ON806631
Ap. pseudoparenchymaticaLC 7234TLeaves of bambooEndophyteChinaKY494743KY494819KY705211KY705139
Ap. pseudoparenchymaticaLC 8173Leaves of bambooEndophyteChinaKY494753KY494829KY705221KY705149
Ap. pseudorasikravindraeKUMCC 20-0208TBambusa dolichocladaSaprobeChinaMT946344-MT947367MT947361
Ap. pseudosinensisCPC 21546TLeaves of bambooSaprobeNetherlandsKF144910KF144957-KF145044
Ap. pseudospegazziniiCBS 102052TMacaranga hullettiiSaprobeMalaysiaKF144911KF144958KF145002KF145045
Ap. pterospermaCBS 123185Lepidosperma gladiatumSaprobeAustraliaKF144912KF144959KF145003-
Ap. pterospermaCPC 20193TLepidosperma gladiatumSaprobeAustraliaKF144913KF144960KF145004KF145046
Ap. pusillispermaKUC21321TSeaweedNot mentionedRepublic of KoreaMH498533-MH498491MN868930
Ap. pusillispermaKUC21357SeaweedNot mentionedRepublic of KoreaMH498532-MH498490MN868931
Ap. qinlingensisCFCC 52303TFargesia qinlingensisSaprobeChinaMH197120-MH236791MH236795
Ap. qinlingensisCFCC 52304Fargesia qinlingensisSaprobeChinaMH197121-MH236792MH236796
Ap. rasikravindraeLC 8179Brassica rapaSaprobeChinaKY494759KY494835KY705227KY705155
Ap. rasikravindraeNFCCI 2144TSoilSaprobeNorwayJF326454---
Ap. rasikravindraeMFLUCC 21-0051Dead culms of bambooSaprobeThailandMZ542523MZ542527MZ546412MZ546408
Ap. rasikravindraeMFLUCC 21-0054Dead culms of MaizeSaprobeThailandMZ542522MZ542526MZ546411MZ546407
Ap. sacchariCBS 372.67AirEndophyte-KF144918KF144964KF145007KF145049
Ap. sacchariCBS 664.74Soil under Calluna vulgarisEndophyteNetherlandsKF144919KF144965KF145008KF145050
Ap. saccharicolaCBS 191.73AirEndophyteNetherlandsKF144920KF144966KF145009KF145051
Ap. saccharicolaCBS 831.71-EndophyteNetherlandsKF144922KF144969KF145012KF145054
Ap. sargassiKUC21228TSargassum fulvellumNot mentionedRepublic of KoreaKT207746-KT207644MH544677
Ap. sargassiKUC21232Sargassum fulvellumNot mentionedRepublic of KoreaKT207750-KT207648MH544676
Ap. sasaeCBS 146808Tdead culmsSaprobeNetherlandsMW883402MW883797MW890120MW890104
Ap. septataCGMCC 3.20134TbambooSaprobeChinaMW481711MW478890MW522960MW522943
Ap. septataGZCC 20-0109bambooSaprobeChinaMW481712MW478891MW522961MW522944
Ap. serenensisIMI 326869Texcipients, atmosphere andhome dustSaprobeSpainAB220250AB220344AB220297-
Ap. setariaeMT492005Setaria viridisSaprobeChinaMT492005-MT497467MW118457
Ap. setostromaKUMCC 19-0217TDead branches of bambooSaprobeChinaMN528012MN528011-MN527357
Ap. sichuanensisHKAS 107008Tdead culm of grassSaprobeChinaMW240648MW240578MW775605MW759536
Ap. sorghiURM 93000TSorghum bicolorEndophyteBrazilMK371706-MK348526-
Ap. sp.ZHKUCC 23-0010Wurfbainia villosaEndophyteChinaOQ588000OQ587988OQ586066OQ586079
Ap. sp.ZHKUCC 23-0011Wurfbainia villosaEndophyteChinaOQ588001OQ587989OQ586067OQ586080
Ap. sp.ZHKUCC 23-0012Wurfbainia villosaEndophyteChinaOQ588002OQ587990OQ586068OQ586081
Ap. sp. ZHKUCC 23-0013Wurfbainia villosaEndophyteChinaOQ588003OQ587991OQ586069OQ586082
Ap. stipaeCBS 146804Tdead culm of Stipa giganteaSaprobeSpainMW883403MW883798MW890121MW890082
Ap. subglobosaMFLUCC 11-0397TDead culms of bambooSaprobeThailandKR069112KR069113--
Ap. subroseaLC 7291Leaves of bambooEndophyteChinaKY494751KY494827KY705219KY705147
Ap. subroseaLC 7292TLeaves of bambooEndophyteChinaKY494752KY494828KY705220KY705148
Ap. taeanensisKUC21322TSeaweedNot mentionedRepublic of KoreaMH498515-MH498473MH544662
Ap. taeanensisKUC21359SeaweedNot mentionedRepublic of KoreaMH498513-MH498471MN868935
Ap. thailandicaMFLUCC 15-0199Dead culms of bambooSaprobeThailandKU940146KU863134--
Ap. thailandicaMFLUCC 15-0202TDead culms of bambooSaprobeThailandKU940145KU863133--
Ap. tropicaMFLUCC 21-0056TDead culms of bambooSaprobeThailandOK491657OK491653OK560922-
Ap. vietnamensisIMI 99670TCitrus sinensisSaprobeVietnamKX986096KX986111KY019466-
Ap. wurfbainiaeZHKUCC 23-0008TWurfbainia villosaEndophyteChinaOQ587998OQ587986OQ586064OQ586077
Ap. wurfbainiaeZHKUCC 23-0009Wurfbainia villosaEndophyteChinaOQ587999OQ587987OQ586065OQ586078
Ap. xenocordellaCBS 478.86TSoil from roadwaySoilZimbabweKF144925KF144970KF145013KF145055
Ap. xenocordellaCBS 595.66On dead branchesSaprobeMisionesKF144926KF144971--
Ap. yunnanaDDQ 00281Phyllostachys nigraSaprobeChinaKU940148KU863136--
Ap. yunnanaMFLUCC 15-1002TPhyllostachys nigraSaprobeChinaKU940147KU863135--
Ap. yunnanensisZHKUCC 23-0014TGrassSaprobeChinaOQ588004OQ587992OQ586070OQ586083
Ap. yunnanensisZHKUCC 23-0015GrassSaprobeChinaOQ588005OQ587993OQ586071OQ586084
Arthrinium austriacumGZU 345004Carex pendulaSaprobeAustriaMW208928---
Ar. austriacumGZU 345006Carex pendulaSaprobeAustriaMW208929MW208860--
Ar. sporophleumGZU 345102Carex firmaSaprobeAustriaMW208944MW208866--
Ar. caricicolaCBS 145127Carex ericetorumSaprobeChinaMK014871MK014838MK017977MK017948
Ar. crenatumAG19066TDead
leaves of grass (probably Festuca burgundiana)
SaprobeFranceMW208931MW208861--
Ar. curvatumAP 25418Leaves of Carex sp.SaprobeChinaMK014872MK014839MK017978MK017949
Ar. japonicumIFO 30500-SaprobeJapanAB220262AB220356AB220309-
Ar. japonicumIFO 31098Leaves of Carex despalataSaprobeJapanAB220264AB220358AB220311-
Ar. luzulaeAP7619-3TLuzula sylvaticaSaprobeSpainMW208937MW208863--
Ar. morthieriGZU 345043Carex pilosaSaprobeAustriaMW208938MW208864--
Ar. phaeospermumCBS 114317Leaves of Hordeum vulgareSaprobeIranKF144906KF144953KF144998KF145040
Ar. phaeospermumCBS 114318Leaves of Hordeum vulgareSaprobeIranKF144907KF144954KF144999KF145041
Ar. puccinioidesCBS 549.86Lepidosperma gladiatumSaprobeGermanyAB220253AB220347AB220300-
Ar. sphaerospermumCBS 146355Probably on PoaceaeSaprobeNorwayMW208943MW208865--
Ar. sporophleumCBS 145154Dead leaves of Juncus sp.SaprobeSpainMK014898MK014865MK018001MK017973
Ar. trachycarpumCFCC 53039Trachycarpus fortunePathogenChinaMK301099-MK303395MK303397
Ar. urticaeIMI 326344-Saprobe-AB220245AB220339AB220292-
Nigrospora aurantiacaCGMCC 3.18130TNelumbo sp.SaprobeChinaKX986064KX986098KY019465KY019295
N. camelliae-sinensisCGMCC 3.18125TCamellia sinensisEndophyte/pathogenChinaKX985986KX986103KY019460KY019293
N. chinensisCGMCC 3.18127TMachilus brevifloraEndophyte/pathogenChinaKX986023KX986107KY019462KY019422
N. gorlenkoanaCBS 480.73Vitis viniferaEndophyte/pathogenKazakhstanKX986048KX986109KY019456KY019420
N. guilinensisCGMCC 3.18124TCamellia sinensisEndophyte/pathogenChinaKX985983KX986113KY019459KY019292
N. hainanensisCGMCC 3.18129TMusa paradisiacaEndophyte/pathogenChinaKX986091KX986112KY019464KY019415
N. lacticoloniaCGMCC 3.18123TCamellia sinensisEndophyte/pathogenChinaKX985978KX986105KY019458KY019291
N. musaeCBS 319.34Musa sp.Endophyte/pathogenAustraliaMH855545KX986110KY019455KY019419
N. oryzaeLC2693Neolitsea sp.SaprobeChinaKX985944KX986101KY019471KY019299
N. osmanthiCGMCC 3.18126THedera nepalensisEndophyte/pathogenChinaKX986010KX986106KY019461KY019421
N. pyriformisCGMCC 3.18122TCitrus sinensisEndophyte/pathogenChinaKX985940KX986100KY019457KY019290
N. rubiLC2698TRubus sp.Endophyte/pathogenChinaKX985948KX986102KY019475KY019302
N. sphaericaLC7298Nelumbo sp.SaprobeChinaKX985937KX986097KY019606KY019401
N. vesicularisCGMCC 3.18128TMusa paradisiacaEndophyteChinaKX986088KX986099KY019463KY019294
Sporocadus trimorphusCFCC 55171TRoseNot mentionedChinaOK655798OK560389OM401677OL814555
S. trimorphusROC 113RoseNot mentionedChinaOK655799OK560390OM401678OL814556
Notes: Newly generated sequences in this study are in blue. “T” indicates ex-type. “-” = information not available. Abbreviations: AMH: Ajrekar Mycological Herbarium, Pune, Maharashtra, India; AP: Alvarado Pintos; CBS: Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands; CFCC: China Forestry Culture Collection Center, Beijing, China; CGMCC: China General Micro biological Culture Collection; CPC: Culture collection of Pedro Crous, housed at the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute; DAOM: Canadian Collection of Fungal Cultures, Ottawa, Canada; GUCC: Guizhou University Culture Collection, Guizhou, China; GZAAS: Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences herbarium, China; GZCC: Guizhou Culture Collection, China; GZU: University of Graz, Austria; HKAS: Herbarium of Cryptogams, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yunnan, China; ICMP: International Collection of Microorganisms from Plants, New Zealand; IFO: Institute for Fermentation, Osaka, Japan; IMI: Culture collection of CABI Europe UK Centre, Egham, UK; JHB: H.B. Jiang; KUC: the Korea University Fungus Collection, Seoul, Korea; SFC the Seoul National University Fungus Collection; KUMCC: Culture collection of Kunming Institute of Botany, Yunnan, China; LC: Personal culture collection of Lei Cai, housed in the Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; MFLUCC: Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection, Chiang Rai, Thailand; NFCCI: National Fungal Culture Collection of India; SAUCC: Shandong Agricultural University Culture Collection.
Table 2. Synopsis of morphological characteristics of Ap. endophytica and its closely related species.
Table 2. Synopsis of morphological characteristics of Ap. endophytica and its closely related species.
CharactersApiospora Species
Ap. endophyticaAp. hydeiAp. cordylinesAp. aurea
Host/substrateAsymptomatic leaf of Wurfbainia villosaCulms of Bambusa tuldoidesLeaves of Cordyline fruticosaAir
ConidiophoresReduced to conidiogenous cellsPale brown, smooth, subcylindrical, transversely septate, branched, 20–40 × 3–5 μmNANA
Conidiogenous cellsAggregated in clusters or solitary, hyaline to golden brown, smoothly, erect, unbranched, cylindrical or clavate, ampulliform or obtriangular, 4–14 × 2–7 μm ( X ¯ = 7.5 × 5 μm)Aggregated in clusters, brown, smooth, subcylindrical to doliiform to lageniform, 5–8 × 4–5 μmErect, aggregated into clusters, hyaline to pale brown, smooth,
doliiform to ampulliform or lageniform, (3–)5–10(–15) × 2.6–5.3 µm ( X ¯ = 7.0 × 4.5 µm)
Integrated, polyblastic, denticulate
ConidiaInitially hyaline, becoming pale brown to dark brown, globose to subglobose, obovoid to ellipsoidal in the face view, lenticular with a thick equatorial slit in the side view, smooth-walled, 14–19 × 12–18 μm ( X ¯ = 17 × 15 μm, n = 30) in the face view, 11–19 × 9–16 μm ( X ¯ = 15 × 12 μm, n = 20)Brown, roughened, globose in face view, lenticular in the side view, with pale equatorial slit, (15–)17– 19(–22) μm diam. in face view, (10–)11–12(–14) μm diam. in the side view, with a central scar, 1.5–2 μm diam.Olivaceous to brown, smooth to finely roughened, subglobose to ellipsoidal, 15–19 × 12.5–18.5 µm ( X ¯ = 17.5 × 15.7 µm)Solitary, terminal, and sometimes also lateral with a hyaline rim, brown or dark brown, smooth, aseptate, 10–30 × 10–15 μm
ReferenceThis study[8][49][50]
NA: undetermined.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liao, C.; Senanayake, I.C.; Dong, W.; Thilini Chethana, K.W.; Tangtrakulwanich, K.; Zhang, Y.; Doilom, M. Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Updates on Apiospora: Introducing Four New Species from Wurfbainia villosa and Grasses in China. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 1087. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9111087

AMA Style

Liao C, Senanayake IC, Dong W, Thilini Chethana KW, Tangtrakulwanich K, Zhang Y, Doilom M. Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Updates on Apiospora: Introducing Four New Species from Wurfbainia villosa and Grasses in China. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(11):1087. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9111087

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liao, Chunfang, Indunil Chinthani Senanayake, Wei Dong, Kandawatte Wedaralalage Thilini Chethana, Khanobporn Tangtrakulwanich, Yunxia Zhang, and Mingkwan Doilom. 2023. "Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Updates on Apiospora: Introducing Four New Species from Wurfbainia villosa and Grasses in China" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 11: 1087. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9111087

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop