Next Article in Journal
Accumulation of Health-Promoting Compounds in Upland Black Rice by Interacting Mycorrhizal and Endophytic Fungi
Previous Article in Journal
Species Diversity of Penicillium in Southwest China with Discovery of Forty-Three New Species
Previous Article in Special Issue
Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Updates on Apiospora: Introducing Four New Species from Wurfbainia villosa and Grasses in China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Additions to Diatrypaceae (Xylariales): Novel Taxa and New Host Associations

by
Naghmeh Afshari
1,2,3,
Omid Karimi
2,4,
Antonio R. Gomes de Farias
2,*,
Nakarin Suwannarach
3,
Chitrabhanu S. Bhunjun
2,4,
Xiang-Yu Zeng
5 and
Saisamorn Lumyong
1,3,6,*
1
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
2
Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand
3
Center of Excellence in Microbial Diversity and Sustainable Utilization, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
4
School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand
5
Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
6
Academy of Science, The Royal Society of Thailand, Bangkok 10300, Thailand
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(12), 1151; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9121151
Submission received: 2 October 2023 / Revised: 17 November 2023 / Accepted: 17 November 2023 / Published: 28 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Taxonomy, Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi)

Abstract

:
Diatrypaceae members have a broad distribution and are commonly found on decaying wood. Despite taxonomic and morphological challenges within this group, there has been a growing interest in Diatrypaceae in recent years. The dead branches of several plant hosts with fungal fruiting bodies were collected from Doi Tung National Park, Chiang Rai, and the Narathiwat Provinces in Thailand. Their morphological characteristics, coupled with a molecular phylogeny of combined ITS and tub2 sequence data, were used to introduce two novel Allodiatrype species (A. dalbergiae and A. eleiodoxae) and one new Melanostictus species (M. chiangraiensis). Moreover, four new host records, Diatrypella heveae, D. major, Melanostictus thailandicus, and Paraeutypella citricola on Microcos paniculata, Nayariophyton zizyphifolium, Dalbergia cultrata, and M. paniculata, respectively, as well as a new geographical record of D. major are reported. This research provides detailed descriptions of macro- and microcharacteristics, coupled with a phylogenetic tree for the newly introduced species and host records. The morphological features of Allodiatrype and Melanostictus are listed in the synoptic table.

1. Introduction

Members of Diatrypaceae have a widespread distribution in aquatic and terrestrial environments [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] with diverse lifestyles, such as saprobes, endophytes, and pathogens, on a wide range of crops and woody plants [3,4,5,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Most genera in this family are wood-dwelling [6,12,13,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Nevertheless, some cause diseases such as dieback, cankers, and grapevine trunk in Cryptosphaeria populina, C. pullmanensis, Cryptovalsa rabenhorstii, Eutypa leptoplaca, E. lata, E. consobrina, and E. parasitica [22,23,24,25,26]. Members of this group produce extracellular ligninolytic enzymes that degrade plant cell walls, consequently facilitating the process of wood decomposition [27,28].
Nitschke [29] erected Diatrypaceae as a member of Xylariales Nannf. (in Sordariomycetes), with Diatrype Fr. as the type genus, to accommodate Calosphaeria Tul. and C. Tul., Diatrype Fr., Diatrypella (Ces. & De Not.) De Not., Quaternaria Tul. and C. Tul., and Scoptria Nitschke [29]. Based on its phylogeny, estimation of divergence time, and evolution of major lineages in the Xylariales, Diatrypaceae is well-supported in this order, and its divergence has affinities with many families in the Xylariales at 66–252 million years ago [30,31]. Recently, several new species have been introduced in this family, and currently, Diatrypaceae comprises 27 genera [12,13,15,20,21,32,33,34,35].
Previously, Diatrypaceae were primarily classified according to stromatal characteristics, comprising the stromatal development degree, perithecial neck structure, and host tissue type [36,37]. However, this family is quite perplexed by the morphology of the stomata [38]. In general, members of Diatrypaceae have been characterized by eustromatic or pseudostromatic stromata ranging from erumpent to immersed and scarcely superficial. The stromata are mostly black or dark brown. The perithecial ascomata have ostiolar necks, and the asci are eight-spored or polysporous, with some being scarcely one or two-spored and unitunicate. The ascospores are ellipsoidal, globose, filiform, or allantoid, and they are hyaline–light brown in the sexual morph. In the asexual morph, they are acervulus subcortical, erumpent conidiomata, and hyaline, filiform, curved, or rarely straight conidia [23,39,40,41].
The placement of genera in this family is confusing because many are polyphyletic [6]. Moreover, diatrypaceous taxa are difficult to distinguish based only on morphology, as they share similar morphological characters [1,2]. Therefore, a polyphasic approach must be applied based on at least the morphological features and multilocus phylogeny for the identification and classification of Diatrypaceae taxa [15,21,26,28,42,43].
This research aimed to explore and document unidentified species within the Diatrypaceae family in the protected area from specific woody plants. Additionally, this study contributes to phylogeny, morphology, host preference, and biodiversity studies and, more importantly, expands our knowledge of the diversity in this family.
During our investigation of wood-inhabiting microfungi in terrestrial habitats in Northern Thailand and a peat swamp forest in Southern Thailand, we collected nine isolates of Diatrypaceae. Based on morphological comparisons and combined gene phylogenetic analyses of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and β-tubulin (tub2), the novel species A. dalbergiae, A. eleiodoxae, and Melanostictus chiangraiensis were identified, as well as four new host records of Diatrypella heveae, D. major, Melanostictus thailandicus, Paraeutypella citricola, on the decaying wood of Microcos paniculata, Nayariophyton zizyphifolium, Dalbergia cultrata, and M. paniculata. Additionally, a new geographical record of D. major is introduced. Furthermore, the morphological characteristics of Allodiatrype and Melanostictus members are provided in synoptic tables.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection, Fungi Isolation, and Morphological Studies

Fresh samples were collected from the dead branches of particular host plants during wet and dry seasons, with a temperature range of 25–33 °C in Doi Tung National Park, Chiang Rai, and Narathiwat Provinces, Thailand. The deadwood from each host was sorted into separate bags and taken to the laboratory for examination. The macro-morphological characters were assayed and photographed using a camera mounted on an Olympus SZX61 stereo microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The micro-morphological characteristics were obtained using a Nikon ECLIPSE Ni compound microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and a fixed Canon 600 D digital camera (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The microfungal structures were measured using Tarosoft (R) Image Frame Work (version 0.9.7). Graphic plates were created using Adobe Photoshop v. CS6. 10.0 software (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA).
Axenic cultures were obtained from a single spore isolation method on potato dextrose agar (PDA) (39 g/L distilled water, Difco potato dextrose), as described in Senanayake et al. [44]. The plates were incubated at 25–28 °C for 2–4 weeks in the dark. Herbarium materials were deposited in the Mae Fah Luang University Fungarium (MFLU), Chiang Rai, Thailand, and ex-type living cultures were deposited in the Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection (MFLUCC). In addition, nomenclatural novelties are/will be linked to Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org, accessed on 15 August 2023), Facesoffungi (FoF) [45], and the Greater Mekong subregion [46] databases.

2.2. DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification

Fresh mycelia were scraped from colonies onto PDA plates and incubated at 25–28 °C for about one week until hyphae covered the plate. The genomic DNA was extracted using the PureDirex Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Bio-Helix Co. Ltd., Keelung City, Taiwan) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were performed using the primers and conditions summarized in Table 1. The total volume of 25 μL including 12.5 μL 10× PCR Master Mix with dye, 1 μL of 20 picomolar forward and reverse primer, 9.5 μL double-distilled water, and 1 μL (50–500 ng) DNA template. All PCR amplification products were visualized on 1.5% agarose electrophoresis gel stained with DL5000 DNA Fluorescent Loading Dye (FluoroDye™ Green, 6×, SMOBIO Technology, Inc., Hsinchu, Taiwan), with the D2100 DNA Ladder (ExcelBand™ 100 bp) (SMOBIO Technology, Inc., Hsinchu, Taiwan) used as reference. The sequencing of PCR products was performed by Biogenomed Co., Ltd. (Seoul, Republic of Korea).

2.3. Alignments and Phylogenetic Analysis

Ninety-three Diatrypaceae reference sequences and the outgroups Xylaria hypoxylon (CBS 122620) and Kretzschmaria deusta (Hoffm.) P.M.D. Martin (CBS 826.72) were downloaded from NCBI GenBank [50] based on BLASTn search results (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi; accessed on 1 September 2023), and the literature [15,51] (Table 2). The sequences of ITS and tub2 were analyzed individually and in combination. Sequence alignments were performed using the online web server MAFFT v.7 (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/index.html; accessed on 1 September 2023) [52], and alignments were trimmed below the gap threshold (-gt 0.25) [53] using trimAl v1.2 (http://trimal.cgenomics.org; accessed on 1 September 2023). Individual gene datasets were concatenated using the Sequence Matrix program v.1.7.8 [54].
The analyses of maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inferences (BI) were performed on XSEDE in the CIPRES Science Gateway portal (https://www.phylo.org/; accessed on 1 September 2023) [55]. The ML tree was conducted with RAxML-HPC v.8 on XSEDE [56] and GTRGAMMA as a substitution model with 1000 bootstrap iterations. The BI tree was performed with MrBayes on XSEDE (3.2.7a) [57]. Following the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) in jModelTest (2.1.6) [58], TIM2+G and TrN+G nucleotide substitution models were selected as the best-fit models for ITS and tub2 datasets. To calculate the Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP), four simultaneous chains were run for 50 million Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) generations, with trees collected every 1000th generation. The first 25% of sampled trees were discarded as burn-in, and the remaining 7500 trees were used to calculate the posterior probability (PP) of each branch [59]. Tracer (version 1.7) was used to check convergence in MCMC trace files through BI phylogeny [60]. The resulting trees were viewed in FigTree v.1.4.0 [61] and edited in Inkspace v.1.2.2 [62]. All newly generated sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 2).
Table 2. Fungal species, strain voucher, and corresponding GenBank accession numbers of the taxa used in the phylogenetic analyses.
Table 2. Fungal species, strain voucher, and corresponding GenBank accession numbers of the taxa used in the phylogenetic analyses.
Fungal SpeciesStrain VouchersGenBank Accession NumbersReferences
ITStub2
Allocryptovalsa cryptovalsoideaHVFIG02HQ692573HQ692524[27]
Allocryptovalsa sichuanensisHKAS 107017MW240633MW775592[13]
Allodiatrype albelloscutataIFRD9100OK257020_[63]
Allodiatrype arengaeMFLUCC 15-0713MN308411MN340297[12]
Allodiatrype dalbergiaeMFLUCC 23-0173OR571759OR771026This study
Allodiatrype dalbergiaeMFLUCC 23-0174OR571760OR591487This study
Allodiatrype dalbergiaeMFLUCC 23-0175OR571762OR771025This study
Allodiatrype elaeidicolaMFLUCC 15-0737aMN308415MN340299[12]
Allodiatrype elaeidisMFLUCC 15-0708aMN308412MN340298[12]
Allodiatrype eleiodoxaeMFLUCC 23-0181OR571761OR591484This study
Allodiatrype taiyangheensisIFRDCC2800OK257021OK345036[63]
Allodiatrype thailandicaMFLUCC 15-3662KU315392_[64]
Allodiatrype trigeminaFCATAS842MW031919MW371289[65]
Alloeutypa flavovirensCBS 272.87AJ302457DQ006959[66]
Alloeutypa milinensisFCATAS4309OP538689OP557595[51]
Anthostoma decipiensJL567JN975370JN975407[67]
Cryptosphaeria ligniotaCBS 273.87KT425233KT425168[68]
Cryptosphaeria pullmanensisATCC 52655KT425235KT425170[69]
Cryptosphaeria subcutaneaCBS 240.87KT425232KT425167[69]
Cryptovalsa ampelinaA001GQ293901GQ293972[70]
Cryptovalsa ampelinaDRO101GQ293902GQ293982[70]
Diatrypasimilis australiensisATCC MYA-3540FJ430590_[71]
Diatrype betulaeCFCC52416MW632943MW656391[43]
Diatrype bullataUCDDCh400DQ006946DQ007002[66]
Diatrype camelliae-japonicaeGMB0427OP935172OP938734[15]
Diatrype castaneicolaCFCC 52425MW632941MW656389[43]
Diatrype disciformisCBS 205.87AJ302437_[68]
Diatrype larissaeFCATAS 2723OM040384OM240964[72]
Diatrype quercicolaCFCC52418MW632938MW656386[43]
Diatrype rubiGMB0429OP935182OP938740[15]
Diatrype spilomeaD17CAJ302433_[68]
Diatrype stigmaDCASH200GQ293947GQ294003[70]
Diatrype undulataCBS 271.87AJ302436_[68]
Diatrypella atlanticaHUEFS 136873KM396614KR259647[2]
Diatrypella betulaeCFCC 52406MW632931MW656379[43]
Diatrypella betulicolaCFCC 52411MW632935MW656383[43]
Diatrypella banksiaeCPC 29118KY173402_[73]
Diatrypella delonicisMFLUCC 15-1014MH812994MH847790[18]
Diatrypella elaeidisMFLUCC 15-0279MN308417MN340300[12]
Diatrypella fatsiae-japonicaGMB0422OP935184OP938744[15]
Diatrypella favaceaIsolate 380KU320616_[2]
Diatrypella favaceaDL26CAJ302440_Unpublished
Diatrypella frostiiUFMGCB 1917HQ377280_[74]
Diatrypella guiyangensisGMB0414OP935188OP938742[15]
Diatrypella heveaeMFLUCC 17-0368MF959501MG334557[5]
Diatrypella heveaeMFLUCC 15-0274MN308418MN340301[12]
Diatrypella heveaeMFLUCC 23-0180OR563997OR591485This study
Diatrypella hubeiensisCFCC 52413MW632937_[43]
Diatrypella iranensisKDQ18KM245033KY352429[28]
Diatrypella longiascaKUMCC 20-0021MW036141MW239658[21]
Diatrypella macrosporaKDQ15KR605648KY352430[17]
Diatrypella majorIsolate 1058KU320613_[2]
Diatrypella majorStrain 7OP060703_Unpublished
Diatrypella majorMFLUCC 23-0177OR564001OR572100This study
Diatrypella oregonensisDPL200GQ293940GQ293999[70]
Diatrypella pseudooregonensisGMB:0039MW797115MW81488[35]
Diatrypella pulvinataH048FR715523FR715495[2]
Diatrypella tectonaeMFLUCC 12-0172aKY283084_[19]
Diatrypella verruciformisUCROK1467JX144793JX174093[75]
Diatrypella vulgarisHVFRA02HQ692591HQ692503[27]
Diatrypella yunnanensisVT01MN653008MN887112[43]
Eutypa astroideaCBS 292.87AJ302458DQ006966[66]
Eutypa lejoplacaCBS 248.87DQ006922DQ006974[66]
Eutypa leptoplacaCBS 287.87DQ006924DQ006961[66]
Eutypa mauraCBS 219.87DQ006926DQ006967[66]
Eutypa sparsa3802-3bAY684220AY684201[27]
Eutypella cerviculataM68JF340269_[76]
Eutypella quercinaIRANC 2543CKX828139KY352449[7]
Eutypella semicircularisMP4669JQ517314_[17]
Halocryptovalsa salicorniaeMFLUCC 15-0185MH304410MH370274[9]
Halodiatrype avicenniaeMFLUCC 15-0953KX573916KX573931[3]
Halodiatrype salinicolaMFLUCC 15-1277KX573915KX573932[3]
Kretzschmaria deustaCBS 826.72KU683767KU684190[77]
Melanostictus chiangraiensisMFLUCC 23-0178OR571763OR577309This study
Melanostictus longiostiolatusMFLU 19-2146MW240636MW775595[13]
Melanostictus thailandicusMFLU 19-2123MW240630MW775590[13]
Melanostictus thailandicusMFLUCC 23-0179OR564002OR771024This study
Monosporascus cannonballusCMM3646JX971617_Unpublished
Monosporascus cannonballusATCC 26931FJ430598_Unpublished
Neoeutypella baoshanensisHMAS 255436MH822887MH822888[18]
Paraeutypella citricolaHVVIT07HQ692579HQ692512[27]
Paraeutypella citricolaHVGRF01HQ692589HQ692521[27]
Paraeutypella citricolaSTEU_8182MF359635MF359670[78]
Paraeutypella citricolaMFLUCC 23-0176OR563996OR591489This study
Paraeutypella guizhouensisKUMCC 20-0016MW039349MW239660[21]
Paraeutypella pseudoguizhouensisGMB0420OP935186OP938748[15]
Paraeutypella pseudoguizhouensisGMB0421OP935187OP938749[15]
Paraeutypella vitisUCD2291ARHQ288224HQ288303[79]
Paraeutypella vitisUCD2428TXFJ790851GU294726[80]
Pedumispora rhizophoraeBCC44877KJ888853_[81]
Pedumispora rhizophoraeBCC44878KJ888854_[81]
Peroneutypa curvisporaHUEFS 136877KM396641_[2]
Peroneutypa diminutiascaMFLUCC 17-2144MG873479_[6]
Peroneutypa indicaNFCCI 4393MN061368MN431498[8]
Peroneutypa kochianaEL53MAJ302462_[1]
Peroneutypa mangroveiPUFD526MG844286MH094409[20]
Peroneutypa polysporaeNFCCI 4392MN061367MN431497[8]
Pseudodiatrype hainanensisGMB0054MW797111MW814883[35]
Pseudodiatrype hainanensisGMB0055MW797112MW814884[35]
Quaternaria quaternataCBS 278.87AJ302469_[68]
Quaternaria quaternataGNF13KR605645_[17]
Vasilyeva cinnamomiGMB0418OP935174OP938737[15]
Vasilyeva cinnamomiGMB0419OP935175OP938738[15]
Xylaria hypoxylonCBS 122620AM993141KX271279[82]
Ex-type strains are demonstrated in bold; “–” denotes that the sequence is unavailable; sequences generated in the current study are shown in bold.

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenetic Analysis

The phylogenetic trees based on ML and BI analyses of combined DNA sequence (ITS and tub2) indicated that the overall topology of the two trees did not have significant differences. Therefore, a tree from the ML method was chosen to represent the evolutionary history of the Diatrypaceae family. The dataset for the ingroups comprised 93 strains from 22 genera representing Diatrypaceae. Xylaria hypoxylon (L.) Grev. (CBS 122620) and Kretzschmaria deusta (Hoffm.) P.M.D. Martin (CBS 826.72) were used as the outgroup taxa (Table 2). The alignment comprised 1549 characters (ITS: 1–602 and tub2: 603–1549). The resulting ML tree had a final ML optimization likelihood value of −20181.820962 and is depicted in Figure 1. Parameters for the GTR+F+G4 model of the combined ITS, and tub2 were as follows: base frequencies—A = 0.225444, C = 0.273304, G = 0.234138, T = 0.267114; rate parameters—AC = 1.029595, AG = 3.305839, AT = 1.302108, CG = 0.974988, CT = 4.155639, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape alpha—α = 0.393250. The Bayesian posterior probabilities of phylogeny using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) were assessed with a final average standard deviation of the split frequencies of 0.009926. The phylogenetic tree constructed from the combined ITS and tub2 DNA matrix introduces three new species and four host associations within Diatrypaceae (Figure 1).
Diatrypella major (MFLUCC 23-0177) clustered with D. major (Isolate 1058 and Strain 7) with low support. Diatrypella heveae (MFLUCC 23-0180) clustered with D. heveae (MFLUCC 15-0274) with ML = 94%, BPP = 0.99 support. Allodiatrype dalbergiae (MFLUCC 23-0173, MFLUCC 23-0174, MFLUCC 23-0175) and A. eleiodoxae (MFLUCC 23-0181) clustered with Allodiatrype species. Allodiatrype dalbergiae (MFLUCC 23-0173) grouped with A. albelloscutata (IFRD9100) and A. eleiodoxae (MFLUCC 23-0181). Allodiatrype dalbergiae (MFLUCC 23-0173, MFLUCC 23-0174, MFLUCC 23-0175) clustered with ML = 96%, BPP = 0.98 support. Allodiatrype eleiodoxae (MFLUCC 23-0181) formed a sister clade with A. albelloscutata (IFRD9100) with 85% bootstrap support. Melanostictus thailandicus (MFLUCC 23-0179) clustered with the ex-type strain of M. thailandicus (MFLU 19-2123) with ML = 79%, BPP = 0.96 supports. Subsequently, M. chiangraiensis (MFLUCC 23-0178) formed a distinct clade with other Melanostictus species with high statistical support (ML = 100%, BPP = 1.00). Paraeutypella citricola (MFLUCC 23-0176), clustered with P. citricola strains (HVVIT07, HVVIT01, and STEU _8182) with ML = 97%, BPP = 1.00 bootstrap support.

3.2. Taxonomy

3.2.1. Allodiatrype dalbergiae N. Afshari and S. Lumyong, sp. nov. (Figure 2)

Index Fungorum number: IF901034; Faces of fungi number: FoF14765.
Etymology: Epithet refers to the host genus “Dalbergia”.
Holotype: MFLU 23-0349.
Description: Saprobic on Dalbergia cana (Fabaceae) woody litter. Sexual morph: Stromata 0.82–2 × 0.93–2.7 mm ( x ¯ = 1.6 × 1.5 mm, n = 10), black, gregarious, erumpent, arising through the cracks in substrate surface, interior well-developed, irregular shaped, multi-loculate. Stromaticous layer comprise outer layer of black–olivaceous, firmly packed, and an inner layer of grey, loosely packed parenchymatous cells. Ostiole appearing as black spots on the surface of the stromata. Ascomata (excluding necks) 250–505(–600) × 125–257 μm ( x ¯ = 393 × 210 μm, n = 10), perithecial, immersed and compacted in the stromatic tissue, dark brown–brown, irregular or mostly subglobose, narrowing towards the apex, with separate short neck ostioles. Ostiolar canal is cylindrical, periphysate. Peridium 17–41 μm wide ( x ¯ = 25 μm, n = 40), composed of two layers, outer layer consisting of brown, tightly packed cells, arranged in textura angularis, inner layer comprising subhyaline–hyaline, 2–3 thick-walled cells of textura angularis. Paraphyses composed of 2–6 μm wide ( x ¯ = 3.8 μm, n = 60), hyaline, unbranched, filiform, septate, longer than asci. Asci spore-bearing section (excluding stalk), (19–)22–34(−40) × 6–10 μm ( x ¯ = 28 × 8 μm, n = 35), eight-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical–clavate, apically flat, with J-apical ring, swollen at upper, apex-bearing section (1.9–)2.6–7(−8) μm long ( x ¯ = 4 μm, n = 35), long and narrow stalks, stalk-bearing section (16–)22–63(–70) μm long ( x ¯ = 37 μm, n = 35). Ascospores (6–)7.5–10.5(−11.8) × 1.9–3.7(−4.1) μm ( x ¯ = 9 × 2.5 μm, n = 50), overlapping or biseriate, hyaline–pale brown, unicellular, smooth-walled, ellipsoidal–cylindrical or elongate–allantoid, 0–2 guttulate at both ends. Asexual morph: Not observed.
Culture characters: Ascospores germinated on PDA within 24 h, and germ tubes were produced from both end cells. Colonies on PDA, reaching 3 cm diam. after one week at room temperature (25–28 ℃). Colony flat or slightly effuse, dense, irregular, thinner towards the periphery, at upper surface white at the beginning, becoming buff with age, from reverse pale brown at first to dark brown after one month. Pigmentation produced on PDA medium with age.
Material examined: Thailand, Doi Tung National Park, Chiang Rai, on dead wood of Dalbergia cana, 26 March 2022, N. Afshari, 4C1T1R1 (MFLU 23-0349, holotype); ex-type living culture MFLUCC 23-0173; on dead wood of Nayariophyton zizyphifolium, 6 June 2022, N. Afshari, 1C2T1R3 (MFLU 23-0350, paratype), living culture MFLUCC 23-0174; on dead wood of Afzelia xylocarpa, 27 September 2022, N. Afshari, 5C3T2R1 (MFLU 23-0351, paratype), living culture MFLUCC 23-0175.
GenBank accession numbers: MFLUCC 23-0173: ITS = OR571759, tub2 = OR771026; MFLUCC 23-0174: ITS = OR571760, tub2 = OR591487; MFLUCC 23-0175: ITS = OR571762, tub2 = OR771025.
Notes: The combined gene phylogenetic analyses indicated that A. dalbergiae (MFLUCC 23-0173) formed a sister clade with A. albelloscutata (IFRD9100) and A. dalbergiae (MFLUCC 23-0173). Allodiatrype dalbergiae (MFLUCC 23-0173) clustered with A. dalbergiae (MFLUCC 23-0174) and A. dalbergiae (MFLUCC 23-0175) with 96% ML/0.98 BPP support values (Figure 1). Our strain is morphologically distinct from A. albelloscutata (IFRD9100) in the size of stroma, ascomata, and peridium and also having subglobous ascomata and a large number of ascomata immersed in a single stroma; however, they almost conform in asci and ascospore size (Table 3) [63]. There are 9/430 bp (2.09%) differences in the ITS sequences of A. dalbergiae and A. albelloscutata (IFRD9100). Konta et al. [12] considered 1.77–2.14% differences in ITS to introduce a species in this genus. As the tub2 sequence is not available for A. albelloscutata (IFRD9100) we considered ITS nucleotides coupled with morphological differences to introduce this species [12].

3.2.2. Allodiatrype eleiodoxae N. Afshari and S. Lumyong, sp. nov. (Figure 3)

Index Fungorum number: IF901105; Faces of fungi number: FoF14766.
Etymology: Epithet refers to the host genus “Eleiodoxa”.
Holotype: MFLU 23-0357.
Description: Saprobic on Eleiodoxa sp. (Arecaceae) woody litter. Sexual morph: Stromata 1.1–0.8 × 1–2.7 mm ( x ¯ = 0.9 × 0.77 mm, n = 10), well-developed interior, superficial, scattered or rarely gregarious on host, comprising black outer layer with smooth or tightly packed, thin parenchymatous cell layer and greenish yellow inner layer with loosely packed parenchymatous cells, with umbilicate ostioles opening to surface of stroma as black spots. Ascomata (excluding necks) 195–450 × 170–300(–405) μm ( x ¯ = 288 × 329 μm, n = 10), perithecial with groups of 2–5 perithecia immersed in a single stroma, globose–subglobose, black–dark brown, with ostiol. Ostiolar necks 100–150 × 50–120 μm ( x ¯ = 140 × 110 μm, n = 10), emerging separately, immersed in stromata’s outer layer, cylindrical, sulcate, periphysate. Peridium 17–25 μm wide ( x ¯ = 21 μm, n = 30), composed of two sections, outer section comprising dark brown, tightly packed cells, arranged in textura angularis, inner layer comprising hyaline cells of textura angularis. Hamathecium comprising 3.5–6 μm wide ( x ¯ = 4.8 μm, n = 20) septate, constricted at the septa, wider and flat at the apex, guttulate paraphyses. Asci 65–118 × 5.7–9 μm ( x ¯ = 92 × 7.5 μm, n = 25), eight-spored, unitunicate, clavate, with long, thin-walled pedicel, upper portion wide, flattened in apex, with J-apical apparatus. Ascospores 7–10 × 2.2–3.3 μm ( x ¯ = 9 × 2.8 μm, n = 30), unicellular, overlapping, hyaline–pale yellow, allantoid–cylindrical or elongate–allantoid, with small, 2–3 guttulate at both ends, smooth-walled. Asexual morph: Not observed.
Culture characters: Ascospores germinated on PDA within 24 h, and germ tubes were produced from both end cells. Colonies on PDA, reaching 5 cm diam. after one week at room temperature (25–28 °C). Colony flat, effuse in the center, dense radially fimbriate towards the periphery, from upper surface white to grey, from reverse dark brown or brown at centre becoming radiantly pale brown to the edge. Yellowish brown pigmentation produced on PDA medium at maturity.
Material examined: Thailand, Narathiwat Province, Yi-ngo District, peat swamp forest, on dead wood of Eleiodoxa sp., 6 April 2022, O. Karimi, 71-Y (MFLU 23-0357, holotype); ex-type living culture MFLUCC 23-0181.
GenBank accession numbers: ITS: OR571761, tub2: OR591484.
Notes: Based on the phylogram generated from ITS/tub2 sequence data, A. eleiodoxae (MFLUCC 23-0181) clustered with A. albelloscutata (IFRD9100) (85% ML). They have 10/554 bp (1.8%) ITS nucleotide differences. There is a significant difference between the branch length in the phylogenetic tree (Figure 1) and the single ITS gene tree. Allodiatrype eleiodoxae (MFLU 23-0357) differs from A. albelloscutata (IFRD9100) in larger stromata with 2–5 ascomata, whereas IFRD9100 has 5–11 ascomata [12]. Also, the asci and peridium dimension is considerably larger [12]. However, these two species have no significant differences in the size and shape of ascospores (Table 3). Our species was isolated on Eleiodoxa sp. from a peat swamp forest in southern Thailand, whereas A. albelloscutata (IFRD9100) was from an unidentified host in a terrestrial habitat in China [63].

3.2.3. Paraeutypella citricola (Speg.) L.S. Dissan., Wijayaw., J.C. Kang and K.D. Hyde, Biodivers. Data J. 9: e63864, 14 (2021) [21] (Figure 4)

Index Fungorum number: IF558003; Faces of fungi number: FoF09150.
Synonym: Eutypella citricola Speg., in Anales del Museo Nacional de Buenos Aires 6: 245, (1898).
Description: Saprobic on Microcos paniculata (Malvaceae) woody litter. Sexual morph: Stromata immersed to semi-immersed in substrate bark, well-developed interior, carbonaceous, scattered black area on bark and clustered into big groups, circular–irregular. Ascomata (excluding necks), 369–570 × 254–540 μm ( x ¯ = 560 × 375 μm, n = 10), perithecial, groups of 2–6 perithecia placed in a valsoid arrangement, black or dark brown, globose–subglobose, enclosed with white powdery endostroma, immersed in stromata tissue with ostiole neck. Ostiolar canal 240–375 × 122–177 μm ( x ¯ = 290 × 155 μm, n = 5), sulcate, papillate, cylindrical, appearing through the bark, with paraphyses in central ostiole canal. Peridium 28.5–42 μm wide ( x ¯ = 34 μm, n = 40), composed of two layers, hyaline, loosely packed cells of textura angularis in the inner layer, dark brown–black compact cells of textura angularis in the outer layer. Hamathecium composed of 2–7 μm wide ( x ¯ = 4 μm, n = 40), hyaline, long, widen at the base, septate, moderately constricted at the septa, unbranched, guttulate, narrowing and apically truncate paraphyses. Asci (excluding stalks) 51–76(–87) × 5–9(−9.8) μm ( x ¯ = 59 × 7 μm, n = 30), unitunicate, eight-spored, cylindrical–clavate, straight–flexuous, thin-walled, J-apical ring, long pedicel (25–45 μm). Ascospores 5–10 × 2–4.4 μm ( x ¯ = 7.5 × 3.4 μm, n = 60), overlapping or biseriate, allantoid–sub-allantoid, straight when young and curved at maturity, subhyaline–pale brown, smooth-walled, unicellular, usually guttulate. Asexual morph: Not observed.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA, reached up to 7 cm diam. after one week at room temperature (25–28 °C), a germ tube was produced from one side. Colony cottony surface, medium dense, slightly effuse, circular and moderately fimbriate towards the periphery, colony from upper surface white to buff, from reverse yellow–pale brown at the centre to cream at the margin. Abundant dots of melanized mycelium expand in the media and are visible from the reverse after one month of incubation on PDA.
Material examined: Thailand, Doi Tung National Park, Chiang Rai, on dead wood of Microcos paniculata, 6 June 2022, N. Afshari, 3C2T3R3 (MFLU 23-0352); living culture MFLUCC 23-0176.
GenBank accession numbers: ITS: OR563996, tub2: OR591489.
Notes: Our isolate (MFLU 23-0352) morphologically resembles P. citricola (HVVIT07, holotype) by having immersed or semi-immersed stromata, dimension of asci and ascospore, as well as the colour of ascospores [27]. Also, our isolate and P. citricola (HMAS 290660) share similar morphological characteristics, for instance, immersed and carbonaceous stromata, sulcate necks, size of ascomata, peridium and paraphysis, and asci ascospores [21]. Paraeutypella citricola strains have been reported from Citrus limon, C. paradisi, C. sinensis, Schinus molle, Salix sp., Ulmus procera, Vitis vinifera, and Acer sp. [17,21,27]. Paraeutypella citricola (MFLU 23-0352) was isolated on M. paniculata from Chiang Rai province, Thailand. Based on phylogenetic analysis of combined gene (ITS, tub2), MFLUCC 23-0176 clustered with three other P. citricola strains (HVVIT07, HVGRF01, STEU 8182) with 97% ML/1.00 BPP statistical supports (Figure 1).

3.2.4. Diatrypella heveae Senwanna, Phookamsak and K.D. Hyde, Mycosphere 8 (10): 1846 (2017) [5] (Figure 5)

Index Fungorum number: IF553859; Faces of fungi number: FoF03775.
Description: Saprobic on Microcos paniculata (Malvaceae) woody litter. Sexual morph: Stromata 1.2–0.86 × 1–0.7 mm ( x ¯ = 1 × 0.86 mm, n = 10), well-developed interior, black, circular–irregular in shape, coriaceous, solitary to rarely 2–4 gregarious, scattered, erumpent, in vertical margins bark of substrate adhering to stromata, white powdery–yellowish pigment entostroma, with brown loosely packed pseudoparenchymatous cells around the entostroma. Ascomata (495–)420–253 × (210–)290–340 μm ( x ¯ = 355 × 290 μm, n = 10), perithecial, with groups of 3–10 perithecia, black, globose–subglobose, immersed in stromata. Ostiolar canal 100–190 μm × 65–90(–114) μm ( x ¯ = 147 × 84 μm, n = 8), sulcate, filled with paraphyses. Peridium 26–42 μm wide ( x ¯ = 34 μm, n = 30), composed of two layers of textura angularis; cells of inner layer hyaline, cells of outer layer dense and brown. Hamathecium composed of 2–5 μm wide ( x ¯ = 4 μm, n = 40), hyaline, septate, unbranched, guttulate, apically truncate paraphyses. Asci (including stalks) 138–90 × 11–19 μm ( x ¯ = 113.5 × 15 μm, n = 20), unitunicate, polysporous, thin-walled, clavate, rounded at the apex, J-apical ring. Ascospores 5–8 × 1.3–2.2 μm ( x ¯ = 6.6 × 1.7 μm, n = 60), overlapping, cylindrical to allantoid or elongate–allantoid, subhyaline to light brown, smooth-walled, aseptate, at maturity straight and guttulate at both ends. Asexual morph: Not observed.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA reached up to 7.5–8 cm diam. after one week at room temperature (25–28 °C), a germ tube emerges from one end cell. Colony flat or effuse, irregular, diffuse in the margin, from above white, from reverse radiating from pale brown to pale yellow outwardly.
Material examined: Thailand, Doi Tung National Park, Chiang Rai, on dead wood of Microcos paniculata, 27 September 2022, N. Afshari, 3C3T3R1 (MFLU 23-0354); living culture MFLUCC 23-0180.
GenBank accession numbers: ITS: OR563997, tub2: OR591485.
Notes: Diatrypella heveae (MFLU 23-0354) is morphologically similar to D. heveae (MFLUCC 17-0368) in size, shape and colour of asci and ascospores and erumpent ascomata with bark adhering to host epidermis, but differs in having smaller stroma, ascomata and the ostiolar canal [5]. All three strains of D. heveae (MFLUCC 17-0368, MFLUCC 15-0274, and MFLUCC 23-0180) were isolated from Chiang Rai, Thailand but from different hosts [5,12]. According to our phylogenetic analyses based on ITS and tub2 sequence data (Figure 1), D. heveae (MFLUCC 23-0180) clustered with D. heveae (MFLUCC 17-0368 and MFLUCC 15-0274) with strong statistical support (100% ML/1.00 BPP). Based on phylogenetic results and morphological overlap, our strain is introduced as D. heveae.

3.2.5. Diatrypella major (Berl.) Lar.N. Vassiljeva, Fungal Diversity 19: 198 (2005) [83] (Figure 6)

Synonym: Diatrypella decorata var. major Berl., Icon. Fung. (Abellini) 3(3-4): 119 (1902)
Index Fungorum number: IF344628; Faces of fungi number: FoF14767.
Description: Saprobic on Nayariophyton zizyphifolium (Malvaceae) woody litter. Sexual morph: Stromata 0.6–1.2 × (0.5–)0.8–1 mm ( x ¯ = 0.9 × 77 μm, n = 10), single or gregarious, scattered on the substrate, semi-immersed, surrounded by bark’s epidermis, black, pustulate, rounded to irregular in shape, with 2–8 ascomata, endostromata comprises inner layer of white, loose, parenchymal cells and outer layer of dark brown–black, small, dense, thin parenchymal cells. Ascomata (excluding neck) (210–)300–488 × 193–400 μm ( x ¯ = 303 × 390 μm, n = 10), perithecial, globous–mostly subglobous, immersed in stroma, black, with cylindrical neck. Ostiole canal 700–750 μm high, 300–450 μm diam. ( x ¯ = 300 × 350 μm, n = 10), sulcate, centric, opening separately, ring-like furrow absent, periphysate. Peridium 14.5–27 μm wide ( x ¯ = 20 μm, n = 30), composed of cells arranged in textura angularis and thin-walled cells, outer layer brown, inner layer hyaline cells. Hamathecium composed of 2.2–4.4 μm wide ( x ¯ = 3.4 μm, n = 30), hyaline, aseptate, unbranched, guttulate, apically truncate paraphyses. Asci 101.5–142(−150) × 14–19 μm ( x ¯ = 113 × 16.5 μm, n = 20), polysporous, clavate, moderately short-stalked, apically rounded, J-apical ring. Ascospores 5–9(−11) × 1.7–3 μm ( x ¯ = 7.8 × 2.4 μm, n = 70), overlapping, allantoid, slightly curved, aseptate, smooth-walled, hyaline or pale yellow–yellowish in mass. Asexual morph: Not observed.
Culture characteristics: Ascospores germinating on PDA within 24 h. Colonies on PDA reaching 4.5 cm diam. After one week at room temperature (25–28 °C). Colony medium dense, fimbriate towards the edge, from above white at the beginning, became pale brown in centre with age, from reverse pale brown at the centre and yellow towards the margin.
Material examined: Thailand, Doi Tung National Park, Chiang Rai, on dead wood of Nayariophyton zizyphifolium, 26 March 2022, N. Afshari, 1C1T3R5a (MFLU 23-0353), living culture MFLUCC 23-0177.
GenBank accession numbers: ITS: OR564001, tub2: OR572100.
Note: The comparison of the ITS sequences revealed that D. major (MFLUCC 23-0177) is 99% similar to D. major (Isolate 1058). Based on the phylogenetic analysis in Figure 1, D. major (MFLUCC 23-0177) formed a separate lineage; however, it clustered with D. major (Isolate 1058 and Strain 7) without bootstrap support. Diatrypella major (Isolate 1058 and Strain 7) only has ITS sequence data. Therefore, the combined analysis of ITS and tub2 sequence data could not clearly define the position of D. major (MFLUCC 23-0177). Vasilyeva and Stephenson [83] provided a short description for D. major; it has small stromata with sulcate ostioles similar to our strain but smaller asci and ascospores. As there was not enough morphological data to compare in detail, we considered the ITS sequence similarity between the D. major (MFLUCC 23-0177) and the two strains of D. major. Diatrypella major has been reported in the United States [2,83]. This study provides additional data for D. major from the dead wood of N. zizyphifolium in Thailand for the first time.

3.2.6. Melanostictus chiangraiensis N. Afshari and S. Lumyong, sp. nov (Figure 7)

Index Fungorum number: IF901106; Faces of fungi number: FoF14768.
Etymology: Epithet refers to the province “Chiang Rai” where the holotype was collected.
Holotype: MFLU 23-0355.
Description: Saprobic on Dalbergia cana woody litter (Fabaceae). Sexual morph: Ascomata 195–290 × 170–378 μm ( x ¯ = 226 × 253 μm, n = 10), immersed, raised areas visible as black dots in the host tissue, solitary or aggregated, scattered, mostly distributed evenly, globose or mostly subglobous, ectostroma yellow. Ostiole canal 80–40 × 48–27 μm ( x ¯ = 57 × 36 μm, n = 5), short, central, sulcate at top, periphysate. Peridium 25–42 μm ( x ¯ = 34 μm, n = 30) wide, coriaceous, 2-layered, outer layer comprising brown–dark brown, thick, dense cells of textura angularis, inner layer comprising hyaline, big cells of textura angularis. Paraphyses 2–7 μm ( x ¯ = 5 μm, n = 40) wide, septate, constricted at septa, unbranched, guttulate, longer than asci, narrow towards tip, with a blunt end. Asci (36–)40–53(–58) × 4–6 μm ( x ¯ = 47 × 5 μm, n = 25), eight-spored, unitunicate, clavate, thin-walled, pedicel 12–23 μm ( x ¯ = 18 μm, n = 20), moderately long, developing from the base of the ascomata, apically truncate, apical ring J- and minute. Ascospores 4–7(–7.5) × 1–1.7 μm ( x ¯ = 5.5 × 1.3 μm, n = 50), L/W 4.2, hyaline–pale yellow, overlapping, aseptate, smooth-walled, elongate–allantoid, slightly curved. Asexual morph: Not observed.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA, reaching 5 cm diam. after one week at room temperature (25–28 °C). Colony circular to slightly irregular, narrower at margin, flat, leather surface, a colony from the front, and reverse buff.
Material examined: Thailand, Doi Tung National Park, Chiang Rai, on dead wood of Dalbergia cana, 7 July 2022, N. Afshari, 4C2T2R2 (MFLU 23-0355, holotype); ex-type living culture MFLUCC 23-0178.
GenBank accession numbers: ITS: OR571763, tub2: OR577309.
Notes: In the combined gene phylogeny, M. chiangraiensis (MFLUCC 23-0178) formed a separate and distinct clade within Melanostictus (100% ML/1.00 BPP) (Figure 1). The ITS base pair comparisons of M. chiangraiensis with M. longiostiolatus and M. thailandicus revealed 16/540 (3%) and 19/540 (3.5%) bp differences (excluding gaps) and 22/643 (3.4%) and 14/637 (2.2%) bp differences (excluding gaps) between the tub2 sequences. Samarakoon et al. [13] observed J+ apical ring in the asci of M. thailandicus and M. longiostiolatus, but we only observed the asci with J- apical ring. Besides, M. thailandicus and M. longiostiolatus have bigger ascomata, ostiolar canal and asci [13]. The peridium size and shape of M. chiangraiensis conform with M. thailandicus, while the paraphyses are similar to M. longiostiolatus (Table 4). We isolated M. chiangraiensis (MFLU 23-0355) from D. cana woody litter, but the other two species were isolated from unidentified hosts from northern Thailand [13].

3.2.7. Melanostictus thailandicus Samarak. and K.D. Hyde, Fungal Diversity 112: 35 (2022) [13] (Figure 8)

Index Fungorum number: IF558721; Faces of fungi number: FoF10198
Description: Saprobic on Dalbergia cultrata (Fabaceae) woody litter. Sexual morph: Ascomata (excluding neck) 250–500 × 247–575 μm ( x ¯ = 313 × 363 μm, n = 10), solitary or gregarious, scattered, immersed in the substrate and slightly raised to surface and visible as black dots on the bark, globose or mostly subglobose, rarely flattened at the base, ectostroma grey to white. Ostiole canal (105–)133–311 × 81–125 μm ( x ¯ = 192 × 104 μm, n = 5), central, sulcate, periphysate. Peridium 22–40 μm ( x ¯ = 33.5 μm, n = 30) wide, 2-layered, outer layer comprising brown cells of textura angularis, inner layer composed of hyaline cells of textura angularis. Paraphyses 2.7–5.5 μm ( x ¯ = 4 μm, n = 30) long, guttulate, septate, unbranched, slightly constricted at septa, truncate at end. Asci (38.5–)44–68.5 × 3.6–5.7 μm ( x ¯ = 55 × 4.6 μm, n = 30), eight-spored, clavate, unitunicate, thin-walled, apically truncate. Ascospores (4.1–)4.6–6.3 × 1–1.9 μm ( x ¯ = 5.3 × 1.4 μm, n = 50), L/W 3.8, overlapping or biseriate, hyaline, cylindrical or elongate–allantoid, aseptate, smooth-walled, guttulate at both ends. Asexual morph: Not observed.
Culture characteristics: Ascospores germinate on PDA within 24 h, reaching up to 4.5 cm diam. After one week at room temperature (25–28 °C). Colony on PDA, flat, narrow towards the edge, from front white at first became yellow–pale brown, reverse white to pale yellow at the margin, buff at the centre.
Material examined: Thailand, Doi Tung National Park, Chiang Rai, on dead wood of Dalbergia cultrata, 7 July 2022, N. Afshari, 6C2T1R2 (MFLU 23-0356), living culture MFLUCC 23-0179.
GenBank accession numbers: ITS: OR564002, tub2: OR771024.
Notes: We isolated and illustrated M. thailandicus (MFLUCC 23-0179) from Chiang Rai, Thailand, associated with D. cultrata woody litter. The morphological characteristics largely resembled those of M. thailandicus (MFLU 19-2123) (e.g., the size of ascomata, ostiolar canals, peridium, paraphysis, asci, and ascospores) (Table 4) [13]. In the phylogenetic analyses, M. thailandicus (MFLUCC 23-0179) is sister to M. thailandicus (MFLU 19-2123) with 79% ML/0.96 BPP support values (Figure 1). The sequence data of ITS and tub2 are similar to those of the ex-type.
Table 3. The morphology of Allodiatrype species.
Table 3. The morphology of Allodiatrype species.
Allodiatrype SpeciesAscostromataAscomataOstiolar CanalsPeridiumParaphysesAsciAscosporesHostsCountriesReferences
A. albelloscutata
(IFRD9100)
680–820 × 910–1560 μm,
well-developed interior, 5–11 ascomata
230–270 × 300–380 μm,
immersed,
globose–subglobose
154 × 30 μm, cylindrical, periphysate5–10 μm N/A43–82 × 6–7 μm, swollen and rounded upper portion, J-apical ring, eight-spored, unitunicate7–11 × 2–3 μm, biserriate or irregular, overlapping, light brown, ovoid to elongate–allantoidUnidentified plantChina[63]
A. arengae
(MFLUCC 15-0713)
690–940 × 370–935 μm,
well-developed interior,
1–5 ascomata
(excluding necks) 250–400 × 240–
400 μm,
immersed,
globose–
subglobose
100–170 × 70–130 μm, cylindrical, sulcate periphysate12–25 μm 3–7 μm, septate, hyalinespore-bearing part (14–)20−45 × (4–)6–10(−12) μm,
apically rounded, J-apical ring, eight-spored, unitunicate
(6–)7–10(−12) × 2–3 μm, overlapping, yellowish–light brown, ellipsoidal–cylindrical or elongate–allantoidArenga pinnataThailand[12]
A. elaeidicola
(MFLUCC 15-0737a)
1.2–2.8 × 0.96–1.66 mm,
well-developed interior
(excluding necks) 280–430 × 180–435 μm,
immersed,
globose–subglobose
120–185 × 60–120 μm14–40 μm N/Aspore-bearing part (17–)20–31(−43) × 4–7 μm, apically rounded, J-apical ring, eight-spored, unitunicate(6.5–)8–10(−11) × 1.5–3 μm, overlapping,
yellowish–brown, ellipsoidal–cylindrical or elongate–allantoid
Elaeis guineensisThailand[12]
A. elaeidis
(MFLUCC 15-0708a)
470–860 × 440–710 μm,
well-developed interior,
bi–multi-ascomata
(excluding necks) 250–350 × 230–300 μm,
immersed,
globose–subglobose
100–130 × 95–115 μm, cylindrical, sulcate, periphysate20–40 μm 2–7 μm, filiform, longer than asci, septate, branched, hyalinespore-bearing part (17–)20–30(−39) × 9–11(−14) μm, apically rounded, J-apical ring, eight-spored, unitunicate(6–)8–10(−11) × 1.5–3) μm, overlapping, yellowish–pale brown, ellipsoidal–cylindrical or elongate–allantoidElaeis guineensisThailand[12]
A. eleiodoxae
(MFLUCC 23-0181)
1–0.8 × 1–2.7 mm, well-developed interior,
2–5 ascomata
(excluding necks) 195–450 × 170–300(–405) μm, immersed,
globose–subglobose
100–150 × 50–120 μm, cylindrical, periphysate17–25 μm3.5–6 μm, septate, constricted at the septa, wider and flat at the apex, guttulate65–118 × 5.7–9 μm including stalk, upper portion wide, flattened in apex, J-apical ring, eight-spored, unitunicate7–10 × 2.2–3.3 μm, overlapping, hyaline–pale yellow, allantoid–cylindrical or elongate–allantoidEleiodoxa sp.ThailandThis study
A. taiyangheensis
(IFRDCC2800)
710–980 × 1430–2290 μm,
well-developed interior,
5–15 ascomata
320–530 × 230–300 μm,
immersed,
globose–subglobose
cylindrical, periphysate12–17 μm N/Aspore-bearing part 32–58 × 6–7 μm, flat at apex, eight-spored, unitunicate7–10 × 2–3 μm, biserriate or irregular, overlapping, yellowish, ellipsoidal–cylindrical or elongate–allantoidUnidentified plantChina[63]
A. thailandica
(MFLUCC 15-3662)
1–1.2 mm wide, erumpent,
4 ascomata
226–336 × 177–235 μm,
immersed,
globose–subglobose,
narrowing towards the apex
periphysate6.5–15 μm 2.2–4.5 μm, septate, longer
than the asci, wider at the apex
55–80 × 5–7μm,
narrow,
thick-walled, swollen
upper portion, apex flat, J-apical ring, eight-spored, unitunicate
3.8–6.9 × 1–1.4 μm, multi-seriate to overlapping pale brown, allantoid–cylindricalUnidentified plantThailand[64]
A. trigemina
(FCATAS842)
0.81–3.23 × 0.61–1.72 mm,
5–7 ascomata
308–680 × 157–376 μm,
immersed,
globose–subglobose
N/AN/Ahyalinespore-bearing part 16–43 × 6–12 μm, spores arranged tightly, J+ apical ring, eight-spored, unitunicate(5.5–)6–8(–9.2) × (1.5–)2.1–2.3(–2.5) μm, ellipsoidal
to cylindrical, multi-seriate to overlapping, arranged at the tip of the asci, colorless
Unidentified plantChina[65]
A. dalbergiae (MFLUCC 23-0173)0.82–2 × 0.93–2.7 mm,
interior well-developed,
multi-loculate
(excluding necks) 250–505(–600) × 125–257 μm, immersed, irregular, or mostly subglobose, narrowing towards the apexcylindrical, periphysate17–41 μm2–6 μm, hyaline, unbranched, filiform, septate, longer than ascispore-bearing part (19–)22–34(−40) × 6–10 μm, apically flat, J-apical ring, swollen at upper, eight-spored, unitunicate(6–)7.5–10.5(−11.8) × 1.9–3.7(−4.1) μm, overlapping or biseriate, hyaline–pale brown, ellipsoidal–cylindrical or elongate–allantoidDalbergia cana, Nayariophyton zizyphifolium, and Afzelia xylocarpaThailandThis study
The symbol “N/A” denotes no data available or not mentioned in reference papers, and the species from this study are indicated in bold.
Table 4. The morphology of Melanostictus species.
Table 4. The morphology of Melanostictus species.
Melanostictus SpeciesAscomataOstiolar CanalsPeridiumParaphysesAsciAscosporesHostsCountriesReferences
M. thailandicus
(MFLU 19-2123)
415–580 × 300–410 μm, immersed, slightly raised,
solitary or aggregated, clusters
or evenly distributed, globose or subglobose,
base rarely flattened
185–280 × 85–145 μm, centric, periphysate,
sulcate on top
27–40 μm2.4–4 μm, long, septate, constricted at
septa, smooth-walled, ends blunt
50–64 × 3.8–5 μm, eight-spored, unitunicate, clavate,
thin-walled, apical ring minute
5–6.2 × 1–1.7 μm, L/W 3.9, overlapping, cylindrical or elongate–allantoid,
hyaline, guttulate
Unidentified plantThailand[13]
M. longiostiolatus
(MFLU 19-2146)
550–630 × 300–370 μm, immersed, slightly raised,
visible as black dots,
solitary or aggregated, mostly in pairs, clusters or
evenly distributed, globose
300–390 × 110–180 μm, centric, periphysate, sulcate on top.30–38 μm3–7.5 μm, wider at the base, septate, rarely branched,
constricted at septa, smooth-walled, blunt end
50–65 × 5.5–8 μm,
clavate, thin-walled, eight-spored,
unitunicate, apical ring minute, developing from the base,
apically flattened
3.5–5.5 × 1–1.5 μm, L/W 3.75,
overlapping, hyaline, cylindrical or elongate–allantoid
Unidentified plantThailand[13]
M. chiangraiensis
(MFLUCC 23-0178)
195–290 × 170–378 μm, immersed, solitary or aggregated, scattered, mostly distribute evenly, globose or mostly subglobose80–40 × 48–27 μm, short, central, sulcate at top, periphysate25–42 μm2–7 μm, septate, constricted at septa, unbranched, guttulate, longer than asci, narrow towards tip, blunt end36–)40–53(–58) × 4–6 μm, eight-spored, unitunicate, clavate, thin-walled, developing from the base of the ascomata, apically truncate, apical ring J- and minute4–7(–7.5) × 1–1.7 μm, L/W 4.2, hyaline–pale yellow, overlapping, elongate–allantoid, slightly curvedDalbergia canaThailandThis study
The species from this study are indicated in bold.

4. Discussion

In this study, we collected nine isolates of Diatrypaceae when studying wood-inhabiting microfungi in terrestrial habitats in northern Thailand and from a peat swamp forest in the southern area of the country. Three new species, one new geographical report, and four new host records were introduced in Diatrypaceae based on the polyphasic approach (morpho-molecular, Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8) recommended by [84,85]. Recently, a significant number of new species and genera of diatrypaceous fungi have been described [2,7,12,13,15,21,65]. Nevertheless, Diatrypaceae species are difficult to distinguish only by morphological characteristics; however, some features are still substantial to identify them (e.g., size of asci, ascospores, peridium, paraphysis, and apical apparatus) [12,13,51].
The above criteria support the introduction of A. dalbergiae and A. eleiodoxae (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3). Allodiatrype was erected by Konta et al. [13] to accommodate A. arengae (the type species), A. elaeidicola, A. elaeidis, and A. thailandica (syn. Diatrype thailandica). This genus resembles Diatrype but differs in the number of ascomata (1–10 immersed ascomata), with or without a black stromatic zone. In contrast, the stromata of Diatrype primarily spread in a large area [12]. Besides, phylogenetically, these fungi clustered in an entirely separated clade [12], as also evidenced by this study (Figure 1).
We also introduced M. chiangraiensis from D. cana woody litter (Figure 1 and Figure 7). Melanostictus was introduced in Diatrypaceae by Samarakoon et al. [13] to accommodate M. longiostiolatus (type species) and M. thailandicus. This genus is distinct from Halodiatrype and Pedumispora; however, all of these genera possess the characteristics of having immersed ascomata, papillate ostioles, and eight-spored, unitunicate asci [3,86]. Melanostictus differs from the other two genera in having yellow to white ectostroma, larger papillate ostioles, and aseptate, cylindrical or elongate–allantoid ascospores [13]. Our collection, M. chiangraiensis, is phylogenetically and morphologically related to M. longiostiolatus and M. thailandicus (Figure 1, Figure 7 and Figure 8, Table 4). However, it has a J- apical ring and smaller ascomata, ostiolar canal and asci than M. longiostiolatus [13].
The placement of species in some genera of Diatrypaceae is confusing as they are paraphyletic or polyphyletic [12,19]. Shang et al. [19] stated that the phylogenetic analyses of Cryptosphaeria and Eutypella genera do not show concordance with morphology, maybe due to the low number of species representing each genus [19]. This agrees with the phylogenetic results of Allodiatrype species. Besides, some genera, like Melanostictus, have immersed ascomata [13], which are difficult to notice. Therefore, it is more likely to find novel species with precise observation for future studies, particularly from substrates without dominant and significant fruiting bodies. Additionally, phylogenetic analysis based on ITS cannot properly resolve this family [31]. Therefore, morphological features coupled with phylogeny based on the ITS+tub2 sequence dataset are needed to identify the species of Diatrypaceae [12,21,51]. However, molecular data for many taxa are unavailable in the GenBank database, confusing phylogenetic analysis, particularly for closely related taxa.
The ITS and tub2 sequences, the primary markers used for the phylogeny of Diatrypaceae, are insufficient to clarify the taxonomy of all family members. Therefore, introducing some species in Diatrypaceae requires a revision with the study of fresh collections and multilocus phylogeny of ITS+LSU+SSU+tub2+rpb2+tef1-α datasets. Using multiple genetic loci for analysis is pivotal. It implies that data obtained from multiple genetic markers provides more comprehensive and accurate insights into the relationships among distinct taxa within the Diatrypaceae. Therefore, the lack of genetic information hampers the precise study and classification of some species’ placement within this family, posing a challenge to a comprehensive understanding of their taxonomy. This emphasizes the need for further studies to fill this important gap. In addition, appropriate morphological characters are essential to determine their placement within the family.
Furthermore, since Diatrypaceae species are recorded on a range of hosts in different habitats, they do not seem to have a host preference [21]. This is similar to the results of this research; A. dalbergiae was found on three different hosts (D. cana, N. zizyphifolium, and A. xylocarpa). In addition, A. eleiodoxae species was isolated from palm litter in peat swamp forests, reinforcing that species of Allodiatrype can be found in different habitats [12,15,65]. Also, most Allodiatrye species are isolated from Thailand and China, whereas all Melanostictus are from Thailand, which suggests a rich diversity in these countries [87,88]. We isolated the two introduced species from a protected area (Doi Tung National Park), showing the potential to explore new fungi in conserved environments and regions to expose novel fungal taxa.
One of the significance of research in a protected area is identifying and documenting the fungi diversity important for preserving biodiversity in specific regions. In other words, understanding the diversity of fungi contributes to ecosystem investigations in different aspects. As fungi play crucial roles in the decomposition of dead materials, nutrient cycling, and symbiotic relationships with plants, discovering the diversity of fungal taxa helps in the functioning of ecosystems. Besides, protected areas like Doi Tung National Park are usually undisturbed, and conducting research in these areas has a high potential for discovering novel and endemic fungal species, consequently contributing to the expansion of fungal diversity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.A., O.K., and A.R.G.d.F.; Formal analysis, N.A., O.K., A.R.G.d.F., and X.-Y.Z.; Funding acquisition, A.R.G.d.F., C.S.B., and S.L.; Investigation, A.R.G.d.F., N.S., X.-Y.Z., and C.S.B.; Methodology, A.R.G.d.F., N.A., and O.K.; Resources, S.L.; Software, A.R.G.d.F.; Supervision, A.R.G.d.F. and S.L.; Validation, C.S.B. and N.S.; Writing—original draft, N.A.; Writing—review and editing, N.A., O.K., A.R.G.d.F., N.S., C.S.B., X.-Y.Z., and S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Chitrabhanu S. Bhunjun would like to thank the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) grant “Total fungal diversity in a given forest area with implications towards species numbers, chemical diversity and biotechnology” (grant no. N42A650547). Antonio R. Gomes de Farias thanks Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) and National Science Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF) (Fundamental Fund: Grant no. 662A1616047) entitled “Biodiversity, ecology, and applications of plant litter-inhabiting fungi for waste degradation. Omid Karimi would like to thank the National Science, Research and Innovation Fund: Thailand Science Research Innovation (Basic Research Fund 2023) entitled “Taxonomy, phylogeny and chemo-profiling of selected families in Xylariales” (662A01003).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All sequences generated in this study were submitted to GenBank [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on 19 September 2023].

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Chiang Mai University for providing the Presidential Scholarship for Naghmeh Afshari and partial support for Saisamorn Lumyong. Naghmeh Afshari also thanks Mae Fah Luang University for the research collaboration. We thank Kevin D. Hyde for his valuable time to review the manuscrit. Shaun Pennycook is thanked for checking and suggesting Latin names of the new taxa. Chitrabhanu S. Bhunjun would like to thank Martin van de Bult, Narong Apichai, and the Doi Tung Development Project for sample collection (permission number 7700/17142 with the title “The diversity of saprobic fungi on selected hosts in forest northern Thailand”), Chiang Rai, Thailand. Omid Karimi would like to thank the Mae Fah Luang University Partial Scholarship for the doctoral degree program and Mushroom Research Foundation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Carmarán, C.C.; Romero, A.I.; Giussani, L.M. An approach towards a new phylogenetic classification in Diatrypaceae. Fungal Divers. 2006, 23, 67–87. [Google Scholar]
  2. de Almeida, D.A.C.; Gusmão, L.F.P.; Miller, A.N. Taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of Diatrypaceae (Ascomycota, Xylariales) species from the Brazilian semi-arid region, including four new species. Mycol. Prog. 2016, 15, e53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dayarathne, M.C.; Phookamsak, R.; Hyde, K.D.; Manawasinghe, I.S.; Toanun, C.; Jones, E.B.G. Halodiatrype, a novel diatrypaceous genus from mangroves with H. salinicola and H. avicenniae spp. nov. Mycosphere 2016, 7, 612–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mayorquin, J.S.; Wang, D.H.; Twizeyimana, M.; Eskalen, A. Identifification, distribution, and pathogenicity of Diatrypaceae and Botryosphaeriaceae associated with Citrus branch canker in the Southern California desert. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 2402–2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Senwanna, C.; Phookamsak, R.; Doilom, M.; Hyde, K.D.; Cheewangkoon, R. Novel taxa of Diatrypaceae from Para rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in northern Thailand; introducing a novel genus Allocryptovalsa. Mycosphere 2017, 8, 1835–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shang, Q.J.; Hyde, K.D.; Jeewon, R.; Khan, S.; Promputtha, I.; Phookamsak, R. Morphomolecular characterization of Peroneutypa (Diatrypaceae, Xylariales) with two novel species from Thailand. Phytotaxa 2018, 356, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mehrabi, M.; Bita, A.; Roghayeh, H. Two new species of Eutypella and a new combination in the genus Peroneutypa (Diatrypaceae). Mycol. Prog. 2019, 18, 1057–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dayarathne, M.C.; Jones, E.B.G.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Devadatha, B.; Sarma, V.V.; Khongphinitbunjong, K.; Chomnunti, P.; Hyde, K.D. Morpho-molecular characterization of microfungi associated with marine based habitats. Mycosphere 2020, 11, 1–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dayarathne, M.C.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Devadatha, B.; Abeywickrama, P.; Gareth, J.E.B.; Chomnunti, P.; Sarma, V.V.; Hyde, K.D.; Lumyong, S.; Mckenzie, E.H.C. Modern taxonomic approaches to identifying diatrypaceous fungi from marine habitats, with a novel genus Halocryptovalsa Dayarathne and K.D. Hyde, gen. nov. Cryptogam. Mycol. 2020, 41, 21–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vasilyeva, L.N.; Ma, H.X. Diatrypaceous fungi in north-eastern China. 1. Cryptosphaeria and Diatrype. Phytotaxa 2014, 186, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hyde, K.D.; Dong, Y.; Phookamsak, R.; Jeewon, R.; Bhat, D.J. Fungal diversity notes 1151–1276: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 2020, 100, 5–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Konta, S.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Senanayake, I.C.; Mckenzie, E.H.C.; Stadler, M.; Boonmee, S. A new genus Allodiatrype, five new species and a new host record of diatrypaceous fungi from palms (Arecaceae). Mycosphere 2020, 11, 239–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Samarakoon, M.C.; Hyde, K.D.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N. Taxonomy, phylogeny, molecular dating and ancestral state reconstruction of Xylariomycetidae (Sordariomycetes). Fungal Divers. 2022, 112, 1–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bhunjun, C.S.; Phukhamsakda, C.; Hyde, K.D.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Saxena, R.K.; Li, Q. Do all fungi have ancestors with endophytic lifestyles? Fungal Divers. 2023, 16, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, Q.R.; Long, S.H.; Lin, Y.; Wu, Y.P.; Wu, Q.Z.; Hu, H.M.; Shen, X.C.; Zhang, X.; Wijayawardene, N.N.; Kang, J.C.; et al. Diversity, morphology, and molecular phylogeny of Diatrypaceae from southern China. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, e1140190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Grassi, E.M.; Pildain, M.B.; Levin, L.N.; Carmaran, C.C. Studies in Diatrypaceae: The new species Eutypa microasca and investigation of ligninolytic enzyme production. Sydowia 2014, 66, 99–114. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mehrabi, M.; Hemmati, R.; Vasilyeva, L.N.; Trouillas, F.P. Diatrypella macrospora sp. nov. and new records of diatrypaceous fungi from Iran. Phytotaxa 2016, 252, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hyde, K.D.; Tennakoon, D.S.; Jeewon, R.; Bhat, D.J.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Rossi, W. Fungal Diversity notes 1036–1150: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 2019, 96, 1–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shang, Q.J.; Hyde, K.D.; Phookamsak, R.; Doilom, M.; Bhat, D.J.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N. Diatrypella tectonae, and Peroneutypa mackenziei, spp. nov. (Diatrypaceae) from northern Thailand. Mycol. Prog. 2017, 16, 463–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Phookamsak, R.; Hyde, K.D.; Jeewon, R.; Bhat, D.J.; Jones, E.B.G.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N. Fungal diversity notes 929-1035: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungi. Fungal Divers. 2019, 95, 1–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dissanayake, L.S.; Wijayawardene, N.N.; Dayarathne, M.C.; Samarakoon, M.C.; Dai, D.Q.; Hyde, K.D. Paraeutypella guizhouensis gen. et sp. nov. and Diatrypella longiasca sp. nov. (Diatrypaceae) from China. Biodivers. Data J. 2021, 9, e63864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Carter, M.V. Eutypa armeniacae Hansf. & Carter, sp. nov., and airborne vascular pathogen of Prunus armeniaca L. in Southern Australia. Aust. J. Bot. 1957, 5, 21–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Glawe, D.A.; Rogers, J.D. Diatrypaceae in the Pacific Northwest. Mycotaxon 1984, 20, 401–460. [Google Scholar]
  24. Trouillas, F.P.; Gubler, W.D. Identifification and characterization of Eutypa leptoplaca, a new pathogen of grapevine in Northern California. Mycol. Res. 2004, 108, 1195–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Luque, J.; Sierra, D.; Torres, E.; Garcia, F. Cryptovalsa ampelina on grapevines in NE Spain: Identification and pathogenicity. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2006, 45, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Moyo, P.; Mostert, L.; Spies, C.F.; Damm, U.; Halleen, F. Diversity of Diatrypaceae species associated with dieback of grapevines in south africa, with the Description of Eutypa cremea sp. nov. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Trouillas, F.P.; Pit, W.M.; Sosnowski, M.R.; Huang, R.; Peduto, F.; Loschiavo, A. Taxonomy and DNA phylogeny of Diatrypaceae associated with Vitis vinifera and other woody plants in Australia. Fungal Divers. 2011, 49, 203–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mehrabi, M.; Hemmati, R.; Vasilyeva, L.N.; Trouillas, F.P. A new species and a new record of Diatrypaceae from Iran. Mycosphere 2015, 6, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nitschke, T.R.J. Grundlage eines Systems der Pyrenomyceten. Verh. Naturhistorischen Ver. Preuss. Rheinl. Westfal. Regierungsbezirks Osnabrück 1869, 262, 70–77. [Google Scholar]
  30. Samarakoon, M.C.; Hyde, K.D.; Promputtha, I.; Ariyawansa, H.A. Divergence and ranking of taxa across the kingdoms Animalia, Fungi and Plantae. Mycosphere 2016, 7, 1678–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hongsanan, S.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Samarakoon, M.C.; Jeewon, R.; Zhao, Q.; Al-Sadi, A.M.; Bahkali, A.H. An updated phylogeny of Sordariomycetes based on phylogenetic and molecular clock evidence. Fungal Divers. 2017, 84, 25–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wijayawardene, N.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Rajeshkumar, K.C.; Hawksworth, D.L.; Madrid, H.; Kirk, P.M.; Braun, U.; Singh, R.V.; Crous, P.W.; Kukwa, M.; et al. Notes for genera: Ascomycota. Fungal Divers. 2017, 86, 1–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wijayawardene, N.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Dai, D.Q.; Sánchez-García, M.; Goto, B.T.; Magurno, F. Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa—2021. Mycosphere 2022, 13, 53–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hyde, K.D.; Norphanphoun, C.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Bhat, D.J.; Jones, E.B.G.; Bundhun, D. Refined families of Sordariomycetes. Mycosphere 2020, 11, 305–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Long, S.H.; Liu, L.L.; Pi, Y.H.; Wu, Y.P.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, X. New contributions to Diatrypaceae from karst areas in China. MycoKeys 2021, 83, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Fries, E.M. Systema Mycologicum; Ex officina Berlingiana: Lund, Sweden, 1823; Volume II, 283p. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rappaz, F. Taxonomie et nomenclature des Diatrypacees a asques octospores. Mycol. Helv. 1987, 2, 285–648. [Google Scholar]
  38. Vasilyeva, L.N. Two new species of the family Diatrypaceae. Nova Hedwig. 1986, 43, 373–376. [Google Scholar]
  39. Senanayake, I.C.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Bhat, D.J.; Jones, E.B.G.; McKenzie, E.H.C. Towards unraveling relationships in Xylariomycetidae (Sordariomycetes). Fungal Divers. 2015, 73, 73–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wijayawardene, N.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Tibpromma, S.; Wanasinghe, D.N. Towards incorporating asexual fungi in a natural classification: Checklist and notes 2012–2016. Mycosphere 2017, 8, 1457–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Phukhamsakda, C.; Nilsson, R.H.; Bhunjun, C.S. The numbers of fungi: Contributions from traditional taxonomic studies and challenges of metabarcoding. Fungal Divers. 2022, 114, 327–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Phukhamsakda, C.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Phillips, A.J.; Gareth, J.E.B.; Jayarama, B.D.; Stadler, M.; Bhunjun, C.S.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Thongbai, B.; Camporesi, E.; et al. Microfungi associated with Clematis (Ranunculaceae) with an integrated approach to delimiting species boundaries. Fungal Divers. 2020, 102, 1–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhu, H.; Pan, M.; Wijayawardene, N.N.; Jiang, N.; Ma, R.; Dai, D. The hidden diversity of diatrypaceous fungi in China. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, e646262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Senanayake, I.C.; Rathnayaka, A.R.; Marasinghe, D.S.; Calabon, M.S.; Gentekaki, E.; Lee, H.B.; Hurdeal, V.G.; Pem, D.; Dissanayake, L.S.; Wijesinghe, S.N.; et al. Morphological approaches in studying fungi: Collection, examination, isolation, sporulation and preservation. Mycosphere 2020, 11, 2678–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jayasiri, S.C.; Hyde, K.D.; Ariyawansa, H.A.; Bhat, J.; Buyck, B.; Cai, L.; Dai, Y.C.; Abd-Elsalam, K.A.; Ertz, D.; Hidayat, I.; et al. The Faces of Fungi database: Fungal names linked with morphology, phylogeny and human impacts. Fungal Divers. 2015, 74, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chaiwan, N.; Gomdola, D.; Wang, S.; Monkai, J.; Tibpromma, S.; Doilom, M.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Mortimer, P.E.; Lumyong, S.; Hyde, K.D. https://gmsmicrofungi.org: An online database providing updated information of microfungi in the Greater Mekong Subregion. Mycosphere 2021, 12, 1513–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.J.W.T.; Taylor, J. Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Glass, N.L.; Donaldson, G.C. Development of primer set designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 1323–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. O’Donnell, K.; Cigelnik, E. Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 Types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1997, 7, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sayers, E.W.; Cavanaugh, M.; Clark, K.; Ostell, J.; Pruitt, K.D.; Karsch-Mizrachi, I. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D94–D99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ma, H.X.; Yang, Z.E.; Song, Z.K.; Qu, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhu, A.H. Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to Diatrypaceae from southeastern Tibet in China. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, e1073548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Katoh, K.; Rozewicki, J.; Yamada, K.D. MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief. Bioinform. 2019, 20, 1160–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Capella-Gutierrez, S.; Silla-Martinez, J.M.; Gabaldon, T. trimAl: A tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1972–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Vaidya, G.; Lohman, D.J.; Meier, R. SequenceMatrix: Concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics 2011, 27, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Miller, M.A.; Schwartz, T.; Pickett, B.E.; He, S.; Klem, E.B.; Scheuermann, R.H.; Passarotti, M.; Kaufman, S.; O’Leary, M.A. A RESTful API for access to phylogenetic tools via the CIPRES science gateway. Evol. Bioinform. 2015, 11, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Stamatakis, A. RAxML Version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; Van Der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Darriba, D.; Taboada, G.L.; Doallo, R.; Posada, D. jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, e772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Larget, B.; Simon, D.L. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999, 16, 750–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rambaut, A.; Drummond, A.J.; Xie, D.; Baele, G.; Suchard, M.A. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 2018, 67, 901–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Rambaut, A. FigTree; Version 1.4.2; University of Edinburgh: Edinburgh, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  62. Harrington, B. The Inkscape Developer Team (2004–2005), Inkscape. Available online: http://www.inkscape.org (accessed on 10 September 2023).
  63. Li, X.H.; Wu, H.X.; Li, J.C.; Song, J.Y.; Wang, Q.; Promputtha, I.; Wijayawardene, N.N. Two new species of Allodiatrype from monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forest in Pu’er, Yunnan, China. Chiang Mai J. Sci. 2022, 49, 565–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, G.J.; Hyde, K.D.; Zhao, R.L.; Hongsanan, S.; Abdel-Aziz, F.A.; Abdel-Wahab, M.A.; Alvarado, P.; Alves-Silva, G.; Ammirati, J.F.; Ariyawansa, H.A.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 253–366: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 2016, 78, 1–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Peng, M.K.; Zhang, B.; Qu, Z.; Li, Y.; Ma, H.X. New record genus and a new species of Allodiatrype from China based on morphological and molecular characters. Phytotaxa 2021, 500, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Rolshausen, P.E.; Mahoney, N.E.; Molyneux, R.J.; Gubler, W.D. A reassessment of the species concept in Eutypa lata, the causal agent of Eutypa dieback of grapevine. Phytopathology 2006, 96, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Luque, J.; Garcia-Figueres, F.; Legorburu, F.J.; Muruamendiaraz, A.; Armengol, J.; Trouillas, F.P. Species of Diatrypaceae associated with grapevine trunk diseases in Eastern Spain. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2012, 51, 528–540. [Google Scholar]
  68. Acero, F.J.; González, V.; Sánchez-Ballesteros, J.; Rubio, V.; Checa, J.; Bills, G.F.; Salazar, O.; Platas, G.; Peláez, F. Molecular phylogenetic studies on the Diatrypaceae based on rDNA-ITS sequences. Mycologia 2004, 96, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Trouillas, F.P.; Hand, F.P.; Inderbitzin, P.; Gubler, W.D. The genus Cryptosphaeria in the western United States: Taxonomy, multilocus phylogeny and a new species, C. multicontinentalis. Mycologia 2015, 107, 1304–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Trouillas, F.P.; Urbez-Torres, J.R.; Gubler, W.D. Diversity of diatrypaceous fungi associated with grapevine canker diseases in California. Mycologia 2010, 102, 319–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Chalkley, D.B.; Suh, S.O.; Volkmann-Kohlmeyer, B.; Kohlmeyer, J.; Zhou, J.J. Diatrypasimilis australiensis, a novel xylarialean fungus from mangrove. Mycologia 2010, 102, 430–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yang, Z.; Zhang, B.; Qu, Z.; Song, Z.; Pan, X.; Zhao, C.; Ma, H. Two new species of Diatrype (Xylariales, Ascomycota) with polysporous asci from China. Diversity 2022, 14, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Crous, P.W.; Wingfield, M.J.; Burgess, T.I.; Hardy, G.S.J.; Crane, C.; Barrett, S.; Cano-Lira, J.F.; Le Roux, J.J.; Thangavel, R.; Guarro, J.; et al. Fungal planet description sheets: 469–557. Persoonia 2016, 37, 218–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Vieira, M.L.A.; Hughes, A.F.S.; Gil, V.B.; Vaz, A.B.M.; Alves, T.M.A.; Zani, C.L.; Rosa, C.A.; Rosa, L.H. Diversity and antimicrobial activities of the fungal endophyte community associated with the traditional Brazilian medicinal plant Solanum cernuum Vell. (Solanaceae). Can. J. Microbiol. 2011, 58, 54–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lynch, S.C.; Eskalen, A.; Zambino, P.J.; Mayorquin, J.S.; Wang, D.H. Identifcation and pathogenicity of Botryosphaeriaceae species associated with coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) decline in southern California. Mycologia 2013, 105, 125–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Arhipova, N.; Gaitnieks, T.; Donis, J.; Stenlid, J.; Vasaitis, R. Heart-rot and associated fungi in Alnus glutinosa stands in Latvia. Scand. J. For. Res. 2012, 27, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. U’ren, J.M.; Miadlikowska, J.; Zimmerman, N.B.; Ltzoni, F.; Stajich, J.E.; Arnold, A.E. Contributions of North American endophytes to the phylogeny, ecology, and taxonomy of Xylariaceae (Sordariomycetes, Ascomycota). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2016, 98, 210–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Moyo, P.; Mostert, L.; Halleen, F. Diatrypaceae species overlap between vineyards and natural ecosystems in South Africa. Fungal Ecol. 2019, 39, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Urbez-Torres, J.R.; Peduto, F.; Striegler, R.K.; Urrea-Romero, K.E.; Rupe, J.C.; Cartwright, R.D.; Gubler, W.D. Characterization of fungal pathogens associated with grapevine trunk diseases in Arkansas and Missouri. Fungal Divers. 2012, 52, 169–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Úrbez-Torres, J.R.; Adams, P.; Kamas, J.; Gubler, W.D. Identification, incidence, and pathogenicity of fungal species associated with grapevine dieback in Texas. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2009, 60, 497–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Klaysuban, A.; Sakayaroj, J.; Gareth, J.E.B. An additional marine fungal lineage in the Diatrypaceae, Xylariales: Pedumispora rhizophorae. Bot. Mar. 2014, 57, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Peršoh, D.; Melcher, M.; Graf, K.; Fournier, J.; Stadler, M.; Rmbold, G. Molecular and morphological evidence for the delimitation of Xylaria hypoxylon. Mycologia 2009, 101, 256–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Vasilyeva, L.N.; Stephenson, S.L. Pyrenomycetes of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. II. Cryptovalsa Ces. et De Not. and Diatrypella (Ces. et De Not.) Nitschke (Diatrypaceae). Fungal Divers. 2005, 19, 189–200. [Google Scholar]
  84. Chethana, K.T.; Manawasinghe, I.S.; Hurdeal, V.G.; Bhunjun, C.S.; Appadoo, M.A.; Gentekaki, E.; Raspé, O.; Promputtha, I.; Hyde, K.D. What are fungal species and how to delineate them? Fungal Divers. 2021, 109, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Maharachchikumbura, S.S.; Chen, Y.; Ariyawansa, H.A.; Hyde, K.D.; Haelewaters, D.; Perera, R.H.; Samarakoon, M.C.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Bustamante, D.E.; Liu, J.K.; et al. Integrative approaches for species delimitation in Ascomycota. Fungal Divers. 2021, 109, 155–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hyde, K.D.; Gareth, J.E.B. Intertidal mangrove fungi: Pedumispora gen. nov. (Diaporthales). Mycol. Res. 1992, 96, 78–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hyde, K.D.; Jeewon, R.; Chen, Y.J.; Bhunjun, C.S.; Calabon, M.S.; Jiang, H.B.; Lin, C.G.; Norphanphoun, C.; Sysouphanthong, P.; Pem, D.; et al. The numbers of fungi: Is the descriptive curve flattening? Fungal Divers. 2020, 103, 219–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bhunjun, C.S.; Niskanen, T.; Suwannarach, N.; Wannathes, N.; Chen, Y.J.; McKenzie, E.H.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.; Buyck, B.; Zhao, C.L.; Fan, Y.G.; et al. The numbers of fungi: Are the most speciose genera truly diverse? Fungal Divers. 2022, 114, 387–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogram generated from maximum-likelihood phylogram analyses of selected taxa in Diatrypaceae family based on ITS and tub2 matrix. Branch supports of maximum-likelihood (ML) values and Bayesian posterior probability values (BPP) are indicated at the nodes (ML ≥ 60%, left/ BPP ≥ 0.90, right); the tree is rooted with Kretzschmaria deusta (CBS 826.72) and Xylaria hypoxylon (CBS 122620). Branches with 100% ML/1.00 BPP are shown with a blue dot. Ex-type strains are in black bold. Taxa originating from this study are demonstrated in red.
Figure 1. Phylogram generated from maximum-likelihood phylogram analyses of selected taxa in Diatrypaceae family based on ITS and tub2 matrix. Branch supports of maximum-likelihood (ML) values and Bayesian posterior probability values (BPP) are indicated at the nodes (ML ≥ 60%, left/ BPP ≥ 0.90, right); the tree is rooted with Kretzschmaria deusta (CBS 826.72) and Xylaria hypoxylon (CBS 122620). Branches with 100% ML/1.00 BPP are shown with a blue dot. Ex-type strains are in black bold. Taxa originating from this study are demonstrated in red.
Jof 09 01151 g001
Figure 2. Allodiatrype dalbergiae (MFLU 23-0349, holotype). (a) Close-up of stromata on Dalbergia cana woody litter. (b) Transverse section of the stroma. (c) Longitudinal section of the stroma. (d,e) Vertical section through ascoma. (f) Section of peridium. (g) Paraphyses. (hl) Asci. (mq) Ascospores. (r) A germinated ascospore. (s,t) Colony on PDA. Scale bars: (a) = 1 mm, (b,c) = 500 μm, (d,e) = 100 μm, (fl) = 20 μm, (m,r) = 10 μm, (nq) = 5 μm.
Figure 2. Allodiatrype dalbergiae (MFLU 23-0349, holotype). (a) Close-up of stromata on Dalbergia cana woody litter. (b) Transverse section of the stroma. (c) Longitudinal section of the stroma. (d,e) Vertical section through ascoma. (f) Section of peridium. (g) Paraphyses. (hl) Asci. (mq) Ascospores. (r) A germinated ascospore. (s,t) Colony on PDA. Scale bars: (a) = 1 mm, (b,c) = 500 μm, (d,e) = 100 μm, (fl) = 20 μm, (m,r) = 10 μm, (nq) = 5 μm.
Jof 09 01151 g002
Figure 3. Allodiatrype eleiodoxae (MFLU 23-0357, holotype). (a) Close-up of stromata on Eleiodoxa sp. woody litter. (b) Transverse section of stroma. (c) Longitudinal section of stroma. (d,e) Vertical section through ascoma. (f) Section of peridium. (g) Paraphyses. (hm) Asci. (nr) Ascospores. (s) A germinated ascospore. (t,u) Colony on PDA. Scale bars: (a) = 1 mm, (b,c) = 200 μm, (d) = 100 μm, (e) = 50 μm, (fm,s) = 20 μm, (n) = 10 μm, (or) = 10 μm.
Figure 3. Allodiatrype eleiodoxae (MFLU 23-0357, holotype). (a) Close-up of stromata on Eleiodoxa sp. woody litter. (b) Transverse section of stroma. (c) Longitudinal section of stroma. (d,e) Vertical section through ascoma. (f) Section of peridium. (g) Paraphyses. (hm) Asci. (nr) Ascospores. (s) A germinated ascospore. (t,u) Colony on PDA. Scale bars: (a) = 1 mm, (b,c) = 200 μm, (d) = 100 μm, (e) = 50 μm, (fm,s) = 20 μm, (n) = 10 μm, (or) = 10 μm.
Jof 09 01151 g003
Figure 4. Paraeutypella citricola (MFLU 23-0352, new host record). (a) Close-up of stromata on Microcos paniculata woody litter. (b) Longitudinal section of the stroma. (c,d) Vertical section through ascoma. (e) Ostiol canal. (f) Section of peridium. (g) Paraphyses. (hk) Asci. (l,m) Ascospores. (n) A germinated ascospore. (o,p) Colony on PDA. Scale bars: (a) = 1 mm, (b,c) = 200 μm, (d,e) = 100 μm, (g) = 50 μm, (f,hk,n) = 20 μm, (l,m) = 5 μm.
Figure 4. Paraeutypella citricola (MFLU 23-0352, new host record). (a) Close-up of stromata on Microcos paniculata woody litter. (b) Longitudinal section of the stroma. (c,d) Vertical section through ascoma. (e) Ostiol canal. (f) Section of peridium. (g) Paraphyses. (hk) Asci. (l,m) Ascospores. (n) A germinated ascospore. (o,p) Colony on PDA. Scale bars: (a) = 1 mm, (b,c) = 200 μm, (d,e) = 100 μm, (g) = 50 μm, (f,hk,n) = 20 μm, (l,m) = 5 μm.
Jof 09 01151 g004
Figure 5. Diatrypella heveae (MFLU 23-0354, new host record). (a) Close up of stromata on Microcos paniculata woody litter. (b) Transverse section of the stroma. (c) Longitudinal section of the stroma. (d,e) Vertical section through ascoma. (f) Section of peridium. (g) Paraphyses. (hl) Asci. (mq) Ascospores. (r) A germinated ascospore. (s,t) Colony on PDA. Scale bars: (a) = 1 mm, (b,c) = 200 μm, (d,e) = 100 μm, (fl) = 20 μm, (m,r) = 10 μm, (nq) = 5 μm.
Figure 5. Diatrypella heveae (MFLU 23-0354, new host record). (a) Close up of stromata on Microcos paniculata woody litter. (b) Transverse section of the stroma. (c) Longitudinal section of the stroma. (d,e) Vertical section through ascoma. (f) Section of peridium. (g) Paraphyses. (hl) Asci. (mq) Ascospores. (r) A germinated ascospore. (s,t) Colony on PDA. Scale bars: (a) = 1 mm, (b,c) = 200 μm, (d,e) = 100 μm, (fl) = 20 μm, (m,r) = 10 μm, (nq) = 5 μm.
Jof 09 01151 g005
Figure 6. Diatrypella major (MFLU 23-0353, new host and geographical record). (a) Close-up of stromata on Nayariophyton zizyphifolium woody litter. (b) Longitudinal section of the stroma. (c,d) Vertical section through ascoma. (e) Ostiol canal. (f) Section of peridium. (g) Paraphyses. (hm) Asci. (nt) Ascospores. (u) A germinated ascspore. (v,w) Colony on PDA. Scale bars: (a) = 1 mm, (b) = 200 μm, (c,d) = 100 μm, (e) = 50 μm, (fm) = 20 μm, (n,u) = 10 μm, (ot) = 5 μm.
Figure 6. Diatrypella major (MFLU 23-0353, new host and geographical record). (a) Close-up of stromata on Nayariophyton zizyphifolium woody litter. (b) Longitudinal section of the stroma. (c,d) Vertical section through ascoma. (e) Ostiol canal. (f) Section of peridium. (g) Paraphyses. (hm) Asci. (nt) Ascospores. (u) A germinated ascspore. (v,w) Colony on PDA. Scale bars: (a) = 1 mm, (b) = 200 μm, (c,d) = 100 μm, (e) = 50 μm, (fm) = 20 μm, (n,u) = 10 μm, (ot) = 5 μm.
Jof 09 01151 g006
Figure 7. Melanostictus chiangraiensis (MFLU 23-0355, holotype). (a) Longitudinal section of stroma on Dalbergia cana woody litter. (b,c) Vertical section through the stroma. (d) Section of peridium. (e) Paraphyses. (fk) Asci. (lp) Ascospores. (q,r) Colony on PDA. Scale bars: (a) = 500 μm, (b,c) = 100 μm, (d,e) = 20 μm, (fl) = 10 μm, (mp) = 5 μm.
Figure 7. Melanostictus chiangraiensis (MFLU 23-0355, holotype). (a) Longitudinal section of stroma on Dalbergia cana woody litter. (b,c) Vertical section through the stroma. (d) Section of peridium. (e) Paraphyses. (fk) Asci. (lp) Ascospores. (q,r) Colony on PDA. Scale bars: (a) = 500 μm, (b,c) = 100 μm, (d,e) = 20 μm, (fl) = 10 μm, (mp) = 5 μm.
Jof 09 01151 g007
Figure 8. Melanostictus thailandicus (MFLU 23-0356, new host record). (a) Close-up of stromata on Dalbergia cultrata woody litter. (b,c) Longitudinal section of the stroma. (d) Vertical section through stroma. (e) Section of peridium. (f) Paraphyses. (gn) Asci. (oq) Ascospores. (r) A germinated ascspore. (s,t) Colony on PDA. Scale bars: (a) = 1 mm, (b) = 500 μm, (c) = 200 μm, (d) = 100, (e) = 50 μm, (f) = 20 μm, (gn) = 10 μm. (or) = 5 μm.
Figure 8. Melanostictus thailandicus (MFLU 23-0356, new host record). (a) Close-up of stromata on Dalbergia cultrata woody litter. (b,c) Longitudinal section of the stroma. (d) Vertical section through stroma. (e) Section of peridium. (f) Paraphyses. (gn) Asci. (oq) Ascospores. (r) A germinated ascspore. (s,t) Colony on PDA. Scale bars: (a) = 1 mm, (b) = 500 μm, (c) = 200 μm, (d) = 100, (e) = 50 μm, (f) = 20 μm, (gn) = 10 μm. (or) = 5 μm.
Jof 09 01151 g008
Table 1. Details of genes/loci with primers and PCR conditions.
Table 1. Details of genes/loci with primers and PCR conditions.
Genes/LociPrimers (Forward/Reverse)Thermal Cycles *References
ITSITS5/ITS494 °C: 30 s, 56 °C: 50 s, 72 °C: 60 s[47]
tub2Bt2a/Bt2b and T1/Bt2b94 °C: 30 s, 55 °C: 50 s, 72 °C: 90 sModified from [48]
T1/T2295 °C: 60 s, 54 °C: 110 s, 72 °C: 120 sModified from [49]
* Initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, final extension at 72 °C for 10 min, final hold at 4 °C, with 40 cycles for all gene regions.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Afshari, N.; Karimi, O.; Gomes de Farias, A.R.; Suwannarach, N.; Bhunjun, C.S.; Zeng, X.-Y.; Lumyong, S. Additions to Diatrypaceae (Xylariales): Novel Taxa and New Host Associations. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 1151. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9121151

AMA Style

Afshari N, Karimi O, Gomes de Farias AR, Suwannarach N, Bhunjun CS, Zeng X-Y, Lumyong S. Additions to Diatrypaceae (Xylariales): Novel Taxa and New Host Associations. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(12):1151. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9121151

Chicago/Turabian Style

Afshari, Naghmeh, Omid Karimi, Antonio R. Gomes de Farias, Nakarin Suwannarach, Chitrabhanu S. Bhunjun, Xiang-Yu Zeng, and Saisamorn Lumyong. 2023. "Additions to Diatrypaceae (Xylariales): Novel Taxa and New Host Associations" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 12: 1151. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9121151

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop