Next Article in Journal
Fusarium Photoreceptors
Next Article in Special Issue
Disentangling the Taxonomy, Systematics, and Life History of the Spider-Parasitic Fungus Gibellula (Cordycipitaceae, Hypocreales)
Previous Article in Journal
Discovery of a New Lichtheimia (Lichtheimiaceae, Mucorales) from Invertebrate Niche and Its Phylogenetic Status and Physiological Characteristics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Peniophora Sensu Lato (Russulales, Basidiomycota)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Corticioid Fungi in Auriculariaceae (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota): A New Genus, Five New Species and Four New Combinations

1
School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2
Qingyuan Forestry Bureau, Qingyuan 511500, China
3
Center for Forest Mycology Research, Northern Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Madison, WI 53726, USA
4
National Institute of Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(3), 318; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9030318
Submission received: 30 January 2023 / Revised: 28 February 2023 / Accepted: 1 March 2023 / Published: 3 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phylogeny and Diversity of Forestry Fungi)

Abstract

:
The Auriculariaceae accounts for most of the species in the Auriculariales, and all species in the family are wood-decaying fungi with gelatinous, crustaceous, or woody basidiomes. Many new taxa were published recently, but the taxonomy and phylogeny of the corticioid species in the Auriculariaceae are far from resolved. We undertook a comprehensive taxonomic and phylogenetic study of the family with emphasis on corticioid specimens collected from East and Southeast Asia. Phylogenetic analyses on concatenated ITS and 28S rDNA sequences of representative taxa of the Auriculariaceae and the genera Eichleriella and Heteroradulum were carried out that resolved five new lineages. Heterocorticium gen. nov. is established for two species with resupinate coriaceous basidiomes with smooth, pigmented hymenophores. Five new species, H. bambusicola (generic type), H. latisporum, Eichleriella alpina, E. bambusicola, and Heteroradulum maolanense, are described and illustrated. In addition, Heterochaete delicata, H. discolor, and H. sinensis are transferred to Eichleriella, whereas H. roseola is regarded as a synonym of Kneiffia discolor (= H. discolor). Eichleriella aculeobasidiata is treated as a synonym of Heterochaete sinensis (= E. sinensis). Heterochaete mussooriensis is transferred to Heteroradulum with Heteroradulum semis as a heterotypic synonym. The present study contributes to the understanding of species diversity, taxonomy, and phylogeny of corticioid fungi in Asia.

1. Introduction

Auriculariaceae is the largest and best-supported clade in the Auriculariales (Basidiomycota) and consists of a large group of wood-decaying fungi with varied basidiome configurations [1,2,3,4] (Figure 1). Within the family are the well-known jelly fungi in Auricularia Bull. and Exidia Fr. that have been intensively studied by several authors in recent years, although the latter genus remains polyphyletic [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Species with poroid hymenophores in Aporpium Bondartsev & Singer, Elmerina Bres., and Protodaedalea Imazeki are also members of the Auriculariaceae [12,13,14]. Corticioid and stereoid taxa are numerous in Auriculariaceae and typically classified in three main genera, Eichleriella Bres., Exidiopsis (Bref.) A. Møller, and Heterochaete Pat. [15,16,17,18,19]. The genera were distinguished primarily by the morphology of the basidiome and hymenophore. Our understanding of these genera has changed dramatically since the phylogenic study of Malysheva and Spirin [15]. They showed that the generic types of Heterochaete and Exidiopsis, H. andina Pat. & Lagerh. and E. effusa (Bref. ex Sacc.) A. Møller, respectively, were placed together in a well-supported lineage, and other species of Heterochaete were nested within the Eichleriella s.s. and Heteroradulum Lloyd ex Spirin & Malysheva clades. They reintroduced Heteroradulum to accommodate Eichleriella kmetii Bres. and related species that are distantly related to Eichleriella s.s. [15,20]. In addition, two new genera, Amphistereum Spirin & Malysheva and Sclerotrema Spirin & Malysheva, were erected [15]. Subsequently, several phylogenetic studies revealed additional new lineages, viz. Adustochaete Alvarenga & K.H. Larss., Alloexidiopsis L.W. Zhou & S.L. Liu, Crystallodon Alvarenga, Metulochaete Alvarenga, and Proterochaete Spirin & Malysheva [4,21,22,23].
Microscopically, taxa in the Auriculariaceae and in the Auriculariales share many common morphological characters [3]. Except for Auricularia that has transversely septate basidia, all other species have typical tremellaceous basidia that are longitudinally septate. Dikaryophyses are usually present in enclosing the basidia, and basidiospores are mostly cylindrical to broadly ellipsoid and relatively large.
Many new genera and species have been described recently; nevertheless, the species diversity of the corticioid fungi in the Auriculariaceae in subtropical and tropical Asia has not been sufficiently explored. The taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships of previously described taxa from the region need to be studied and integrated with the newer taxa. In the present study, we performed (1) phylogenetic analyses of Auriculariaceae by adding corticioid taxa recently collected from East and Southeast Asia and (2) morphological examinations of recent collections as well as type specimens of some older species. We resolved five new lineages, including a new genus named Heterocorticium. Five new species in Heterocorticium, Eichleriella, and Heteroradulum were described and illustrated. In addition, the taxonomic and phylogenetic positions of some species of Heterochaete and Eichleriella were determined, resulting in the proposal of several new combinations.

2. Materials and Methods

Specimen collection, morphological studies, DNA extraction and sequencing and phylogenetic analyses followed [24]. Three separate datasets of concatenated ITS-28S sequences of the Auriculariaceae, Eichleriella and Heteroradulum were analyzed (Table 1). Protoacia delicata Spirin & Malysheva was selected as the outgroup for the Auriculariaceae dataset, Amphistereum leveilleanum (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Spirin & Malysheva and A. schrenkii (Burt) Spirin & Malysheva were used for the Eichleriella dataset, whilst Exidiopsis effusa (Bref. ex Sacc.) Möller and Tremellochaete japonica (Yasuda) Raitv. were used for the Heteroradulum dataset. Four Markov chains were run for 1,000,000 generations for Eichleriella and Heteroradulum datasets separately, and 4,000,000 generations for the Auriculariaceae dataset until the split deviation frequency value was lower than 0.01.

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenetic Analyses

The Auriculariaceae dataset contained 58 ITS and 57 28S sequences from 61 samples representing 47 ingroup taxa and the outgroup (Table 1), and had an aligned length of 1953 characters, of which 414 were parsimony-informative. MP analysis yielded 33 equally parsimonious trees (TL = 1864, CI = 0.436, RI = 0.657, RC = 0.287, HI = 0.564). The Eichleriella dataset contained 30 ITS and 26 28S sequences from 31 samples representing 17 ingroup taxa and the outgroup and had an aligned length of 1859 characters, of which 137 were parsimony-informative. MP analysis yielded six equally parsimonious trees (TL = 409, CI = 0.650, RI = 0.793, RC = 0.516, HI = 0.350). The Heteroradulum dataset contained 20 ITS and 20 28S sequences from 20 samples, representing nine ingroup taxa and the outgroup, and had an aligned length of 1847 characters, of which 115 were parsimony-informative. MP analysis yielded one equally parsimonious tree (TL = 281, CI = 0.726, RI = 0.835, RC = 0.607, HI = 0.274).
jModelTest suggested SYM+I+G as the best-fit models of nucleotide evolution for the Auriculariaceae dataset, and GTR+I+G for the Eichleriella and Heteroradulum datasets. The average standard deviations of split frequencies of BI were 0.008874, 0.007964, and 0.003569 for the three datasets at the end of the runs. The MP, ML, and BI analyses of the three datasets resulted in almost identical tree topologies. The MP tree of the Auriculariaceae is shown in Figure 2, whilst ML trees of Eichleriella and Heteroradulum are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4 with the parsimony bootstrap values (≥ 50%, first), likelihood bootstrap values (≥ 50%, second), and Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥ 0.95, third) labelled along the branches.
In the Auriculariaceae tree (Figure 2), 19 distinct lineages corresponding to 18 known genera and the new genus, Heterocorticium, were recognized. Two new species of Heterocorticium, H. bambusicola and H. latisporum, formed a distinct lineage with strong support values (93/94/1). The lineages representing Eichleriella and Heteroradulum were strongly supported as monophyletic genera. In the Eichleriella tree (Figure 3), seventeen distinct lineages including two new species, E. alpina and E. bambusicola, and clades representing three Heterochaete species, H. delicata, H. discolor, H. sinensis, were recognized. Two samples of E. aculeobasidiata, including the holotype (CLZhao 6159) and one sample identified as Heterochaete delicata (TUFC33717), were nested within the E. sinensis lineage (61/73/1). In the Heteroradulum tree (Figure 4), eight lineages including the species, H. maolanense and H. mussooriense, were recognized. The holotype of H. semis (OM10618) was nested within the H. mussooriense lineage (99/93/1).

3.2. Taxonomy

  • Heterocorticium S.H. He, T. Nie & Yue Li, gen. nov.
MycoBank: MB847441
Type species—Heterocorticium bambusicola S.H. He, T. Nie & Yue Li
Etymology—“Hetero-”: different, refers to the septate basidia; “Corticium”: a generic name of corticioid homobasidiomycetes, refers to the basidiomes similar to Corticium.
Basidiomes annual, resupinate, effused, closely adnate, inseparable from substrate, thin, coriaceous. Hymenophore smooth, grey, orange to brown; margin thinning out or abrupt, adnate. Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae clamped, colorless, thin- to thick-walled, frequently branched, septate. Subiculum indistinct, composed of densely interwoven hyphae. Cystidia absent or present. Dikaryophyses present, colorless, thin-walled, frequently branched. Basidia ovoid or subglobose, longitudinally septate, four-celled, embedded, without enucleate stalk. Basidiospores cylindrical or ellipsoid with an apiculus, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, IKI–, CB–, with oily contents, capable of germinating by repetition.
Notes—Heterocorticium is characterized by the resupinate coriaceous basidiomes with smooth, pigmented hymenophores, monomitic hyphal system with clamped generative hyphae, and cylindrical or ellipsoid basidiospores. Macroscopically, Heterocorticium resembles a typical crust, but can be readily distinguished from homobasidiomycetes by its longitudinally septate basidia. Heterocorticium is similar to Exidiopsis and Alloexidiopsis in that they differ by pale-colored basidiomes [4,17,18]. The monotypic genus Sclerotrema recently segregated from Exidiopsis is similar to Heterocorticium by sharing a pigmented hymenophore but differs by its distinctly curved allantoid basidiospores and occurrence mainly on Alnus [15,18]. In the phylogenetic tree, Heterocorticium formed a distinct lineage and did not show a close relationship with other genera (Figure 2).
MycoBank: MB847442
Type—China, Jiangxi Province, Yifeng County, Guanshan Nature Reserve, on culm of dead bamboo, 10 August 2016, He 4236 (BJFC 023678, holotype, CFMR, isotype).
Etymology—refers to its preferred substrate, bamboo.
Fruiting body—Basidiomes annual, resupinate, effused, closely adnate, inseparable from substrate, coriaceous, first as small colonies, later confluent up to 20 × 5 cm, up to 120 µm thick in section. Hymenophore smooth, orange white (6A2), orang grey (6B2), greyish orange [6B(3–6)] to brownish orange [6C(3–6)], not cracked; margin thinning out or abrupt, distinct and white (6A1) when juvenile, indistinct and concolorous with hymenophore when mature.
Microscopic structures—Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae with clamp connections. Subiculum thin, with many crystals adjacent to substrate; hyphae in this layer colorless, thin-walled, frequently branched and septate, slightly agglutinated, densely interwoven, 1–3 µm in diam. Cystidia absent. Dikaryophyses numerous, forming a light brown layer in hymenium, colorless, thin-walled, frequently branched. Basidia embedded, ovoid to subglobose, longitudinally septate, four-celled, without enucleate stalk, 13–20 × 9–11 µm. Basidiospores cylindrical with a distinct apiculus, slightly curved, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, IKI–, CB–, with oily contents, capable of germinating by repetition, 10–14 × 5–6 µm, L = 11.5 µm, W = 5.5 µm, Q = 1.8–2.4 (n = 60/2).
Additional specimens examined—China, Fujian Province, Jian’ou County, Wanmulin Nature Reserve, on culm of dead bamboo, 19 August 2016, He 4545 (BJFC 023986); Nanping County, Wuyishan Forest Park, on dead bamboo, 3 October 2018, He 5691 (BJFC 026753); Guangxi Autonomous Region, Xing’an County, Mao’ershan Nature Reserve, on culm of dead bamboo, 13 July 2017, He 4799 (BJFC 024318, CFMR); Jiangxi Province, Yifeng County, Guanshan Nature Reserve, on culm of dead bamboo, 10 August 2016, He 4234 (BJFC023676) and He 4260 (BJFC 023702); Anyuan County, Sanbaishan Forest Park, on culm of dead bamboo, 15 August 2016, He 4415 (BJFC 023856); Taiwan, Nantou County, Jenai Township, Entrance of Southern Tungyenshan, alt. 1700 m, on culm of dead bamboo, 7 December 2016, He 4604 (BJFC 024046, CFMR) and He 4607 (BJFC 024049); Xitou, on culm of rotten bamboo, 11 December 2016, He 4638 (BJFC 024081); Yunnan Province, Lushui County, Gaoligongshan Nature Reserve, on culm of dead bamboo, 29 November 2015, He 3341 (BJFC 021736, CFMR), He 3344 (BJFC 021739) and He 3359 (BJFC 021754); Xichou County, Xiaoqiaogou Forest Farm, on culm of dead bamboo, 16 November 2019, He 6293 (BJFC 033237); Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Forest Eco-Park, on culm of dead bamboo, 8 December 2019, He 6430 (BJFC 033374) and He 6435 (BJFC 033379).
Notes—Heterocorticium bambusicola is widely distributed in southern China on bamboo and was also found in Malaysia. It is characterized by thin, resupinate, coriaceous basidiomes, smooth hymenophore, and well-developed dikaryophyses. The other species in the genus, H. latisporum, differs from H. bambusicola by having grayish brown hymenophore and wider basidiospores.
  • Heterocorticium latisporum S.H. He, T. Nie & Yue Li, sp. nov. Figure 5B and Figure 8
MycoBank: MB847443
Type—China, Sichuan Province, Qionglai County, Tiantaishan Forest Park, on fallen angiosperm branch, 23 September 2012, He 20120923-20 (BJFC 014667, holotype, CFMR, isotype).
Etymology—refers to wide basidiospores.
Fruiting body—Basidiomes annual, resupinate, effused, closely adnate, inseparable from substrate, coriaceous; first as small, scattered colonies, later confluent up to 10 × 2.5 cm, up to 150 µm thick in section. Hymenophore smooth, brownish orange [6C(3–4)], greyish brown [6(D–F)3], light brown [6D(4–6)] to brown [6E(4–6)], not cracked or locally cracked; margin thinning out, white (6A1) when juvenile, becoming concolorous with hymenophore when mature.
Microscopic structures—Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae with clamp connections. Subiculum thin, with scattered crystals; hyphae colorless, thin- to slightly thick-walled, frequently branched, septate, slightly agglutinated, densely interwoven, 2–3 µm in diam. Cystidia clavate, colorless, with a basal clamp connection, 20–60 × 6–13 µm. Dikaryophyses numerous, colorless, thin-walled, slightly branched. Basidia embedded, ovoid to subglobose, longitudinally septate, four-celled, without enucleate stalk, 16–22 × 11–15 µm. Basidiospores broadly ellipsoid-to-ovoid with a distinct apiculus, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, IKI–, CB–, with oily contents, capable of germinating by repetition, 11–13 (–14) × 8–9 µm, L = 12 µm, W = 8.5 µm, Q = 1.4 (n = 30/1).
Additional specimen examined—China, Anhui Province, Jingde County, Majiaxi Forest Park, on dead angiosperm branch, 27 July 2022, He 7540 (BJFC 038676).
Notes—Heterocorticium latisporum is characterized by resupinate coriaceous basidiomes with a grayish brown, smooth hymenophore, and broadly ellipsoid-to-ovoid basidiospores.
MycoBank: MB847444
Type—China, Sichuan Province, Xiaojin County, Siguniangshan Nature Reserve, on dead angiosperm branch, 16 September 2012, He 20120916-1 (BJFC 014581, holotype).
Etymology—refers to growing on mountains of high altitude.
Fruiting body—Basidiomes annual, discoid, resupinate to slightly effused-reflexed, adnate, separable from substrate, coriaceous, brittle; first as small patches, later confluent up to 5.5 cm long, 1.5 cm wide, up to 400 µm thick in section. Hymenophore smooth to slightly tuberculate, white (6A1) when fresh, becoming greyish green [1D(2–5)], yellowish grey (2C2) to olive grey (2D2) upon drying, not cracked or partly cracked when dry; margin abrupt, slightly elevated, concolorous or slightly darker than hymenophore.
Microscopic structures—Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections. Basal layer present, yellow to yellowish brown; hyphae yellow, distinctly thick-walled, densely agglutinated, unbranched, aseptate, 3–5 µm in diam. Subiculum thick; hyphae in this layer colorless, slightly-to-distinctly thick-walled, rarely branched, moderately septate, interwoven, 2–4 µm in diam. Hymenium composed of dikaryophyses, basidia and immature basidia. Cystidia absent. Dikaryophyses numerous, colorless, thin-walled, frequently branched. Basidia clavate to subcylindrical, colorless, longitudinally septate, four-celled, 20–26 × 10–15 µm. Immature basidia abundant, subglobose to ellipsoid. Basidiospores cylindrical with a small apiculus, slightly curved, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, IKI–, CB–, with oily contents, capable of germinating by repetition, 15–17 × 6–7 µm, L = 16 µm, W = 6.5 µm, Q = 2.5 (n = 30/1).
Notes—Eichleriella alpina is characterized by having discoid-to-slightly effused-reflexed basidiomes, a distinct basal layer, relatively large basidiospores and a distribution in temperate areas of southwestern China. Eichleriella macrospora (Ellis and Everh.) G.W. Martin is similar but differs in having slightly shorter basidiospores (10–15 × 5–7 µm) and a distribution in the north central USA [33]. In the phylogenetic tree, E. alpina formed a distinct lineage in the Eichlerilla clade (Figure 3).
MycoBank: MB847445
Type—Thailand, Chiang Rai Province, Doi Mae Salong, on culm of dead bamboo, 22 July 2016, He 4073 (BJFC 023514, holotype, CFMR, isotype).
Etymology—refers to growing on bamboo.
Fruiting body—Basidiomes annual, resupinate, adnate, separable from substrate, soft, membranous to coriaceous, first as small colonies, later confluent up to 10 cm long, 4 cm wide, up to 500 µm thick in section, new basidiomes are usually grown from dead parts. Hymenophore smooth, greyish orange [5B(3–5)] to brownish orange [5C(3–5)] in fertile parts, light brown [5D(3–5)] in sterile or dead areas, not cracked; margin slightly thinning out, white (5A1), fimbriate when juvenile, becoming concolorous or darker than hymenophore with age.
Microscopic structures—Hyphal system dimitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections. Subiculum thick, yellow. Skeletal hyphae setae-like, predominant, yellow to yellowish brown, distinctly thick-walled to subsolid, frequently branched, usually bifurcated, up to 7 µm in diam., slightly dextrinoid, branches short or long with acute tips. Generative hyphae rare to abundant, colorless, thin- to slightly thick-walled, rarely branched, frequently septate, scattered among skeletal hyphae, 1.5–4 µm in diam. Hymenium composed of dikaryophyses, basidia and immature basidia. Cystidia absent. Dikaryophyses numerous, colorless, thin-walled, frequently branched, usually stalked, swollen in middle part. Basidia ovoid to subglobose, colorless, longitudinally septate, four-celled, 15–20 × 9–13 µm. Basidiospores ellipsoid-to-broadly ellipsoid, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, IKI–, CB–, with oily contents, capable of germinating by repetition, 10–13 × 6–7.5 µm, L = 11 µm, W = 7 µm, Q = 1.6–1.7 (n = 60/2).
Additional specimens examined—China, Hunan Province, Dong’an County, Shunhuangshan Nature Reserve, on culm of dead bamoo, 3 July 2015, He 2365 (BJFC 020819, CFMR) and He 2371 (BJFC 020825, CFMR); Jiangxi Province, Yifeng County, Guanshan Nature Reserve, on culm of dead bamboo, 9 August 2016, He 4168 (BJFC 023610, CFMR); Zhejiang Province, Lin’an County, Tianmushan Nature Reserve, on culm of dead Phyllostachys, 15 October 2004, Dai 6391 (BJFC 016628, CFMR); Thailand, Chiang Rai Province, Doi Pui, on culm of dead bamboo, 23 July 2016, He 4088 (BJFC 023529).
Notes—Eichleriella bambusicola is characterized by having resupinate basidiomes, a dimitic hyphal system with yellow setae-like skeletal hyphae, ellipsoid-to-broadly ellipsoid basidiospores, and fruiting on bamboo in subtropical and tropical areas of China. Eichleriella bambusicola is similar to E. leveilleana (Berk. and M.A. Curtis) Burt and E. schrenkii Burt because of its dimitic hyphal system with richly dichotomously branched and yellow-to-brown skeletal hyphae. This character was mentioned by Malysheva and Spirin [15] when establishing the genus Amphistereum for the latter two species. Notably, E. bambusicola nested within the Eichleriella s.s. lineage rather than the Amphistereum lineage in our phylogenetic analyses, although the two lineages are sisters with relatively strong support values in MP and ML analyses (Figure 2). Eichleriella tenuicula (Lév.) Spirin and Malysheva also has a dimitic hyphal system but differs from E. bambusicola by having a spiny hymenophore, unbranched skeletal hyphae, and two-celled basidia [15,16]. In the phylogenetic tree, samples of E. bambusicola from Thailand and China formed a distinct linage (Figure 3). The yellow, setae-like skeletal hyphae of E. bambusicola resemble the dichohyphae of Vararia P. Karst, which is a homobasidiomycetes in the Russulales [34].
  • Eichleriella delicata (Bres.) S.H. He & Nakasone, comb. nov. Figure 11A
MycoBank: MB847446
Heterochaete delicata Bres., Hedwigia 53: 77, 1912.
Hydnum delicatum Klotzch ex Berk., Ann. Nat. Hist., Mag. Zool. Bot. Geol. 3 no. 19: 395, 1839 (nom. illeg.); non H. delicatum Schwein., Trans. Am. Phil. Soc., New Series 4(2): 161. 1832.
Specimens studied—Eichleriella delicata: Australia, New South Wales, Sydney, Hyde Park, on hardwood, 15 October 2001, H.H. Burdsall, Jr., FP-140099 (CFMR); China, Yunnan Province, Ruili County, Moli Tropical Rain Forest Park, on fallen angiosperm branch, 2 December 2015, He 3469 (BJFC 021866, CFMR).
Eichleriella tenuicula: China, Hainan Province, Danzhou Tropical Botanical Garden, on fallen angiosperm branch, 7 May 2009, Cui 6306 (BJFC 004162); Taiwan, Nantou County, Xinyi Township, Xitou, on fallen angiosperm branch, 11 December 2016, He 4634 (BJFC 024077); Yunnan Province, Ruili County, Moli Tropical Rain Forest Park, on fallen angiosperm branch, 2 December 2015, He 3483 (BJFC 021880, CFMR); Thailand, Chiang Rai Province, Campus of Mae Fah Luang University, on dead but still attached branch of Cinnamomum porrectum, 21 July 2016, He 4053 (BJFC 023492).
Notes—Bodman [16] treated Heterochaete tenuicula (Lév.) Pat. as a synonym of H. delicata, whereas Roberts [35] preferred H. tenuicula and treated H. delicata as a synonym. Malysheva and Spirin [15] transferred H. tenuicula to Eichleriella but did not mention H. delicata. Heterochaete delicata was described from India whereas H. tenuicula was from Java, Indonesia. Morphologically, the two species are similar sharing effused-to-effuse-reflexed basidiomes, two-celled basidia, and long basidiospores [16,35]. However, the taxa are placed in distinct lineages in the phylogenetic tree (Figure 3). Although inseparable in morphology, we accept H. delicata and H. tenuicula as distinct species and propose the transfer of H. delicata to Eichleriella. Significantly, the ITS sequence similarity between H. delicata (He 3469) and H. tenuicula (He 3483) is 97.5 % of 514 base pairs.
  • Eichleriella discolor (Berk. & Broome) S.H. He & Nakasone, comb. nov. Figure 11B
MycoBank: MB847447
Kneiffia discolor Berk. & Broome, Journal Linnean Society. Botany 14: 62, 1873 (1875).
Kneiffiella discolor (Berk. & Broome) Henn., in Engler & Prantl, Nat. Pflanzenfam.: I, Teil. 1 (Leipzig), Abt.: Fungi (Eumycetes): 141, 1898.
Heterochaete discolor (Berk. & Broome) Petch, Annals Royal Botanic Gardens Peradeniya 9: 137, 1924.
= Heterochaete tonkiniana Pat., Bulletin Herbier Boissier 1: 301, 1893.
= Heterochaete roseola Pat., Bulletin Société Mycologique France 29: 207, 1913.
= Heterochaete cheesmanii Wakef., Bulletin Miscellaneous Information, Kew 1915: 373.
Fruiting body—Basidiomes widely effused, closely adnate; first as small circular-to-orbicular colonies, later confluent, up to 7 cm long, 4 cm wide, thin, 100–300 (–900) μm thick, soft, subceraceous to cretaceous. Hymenophore spiny-to-velutinous from hyphal pegs, (4–) 6–8 (–10) per mm, with smooth areas between pegs; pegs above hymenium (70–) 85–200 (–240) × (30–) 45–60 (–80) μm, single, terete, brittle, colorless to concolorous first then becoming dark yellow or light brown; overall surface first yellowish white (4A2), pale yellow (4A3), orange white (5A2), pale orange (5A3), light orange (5A4), then darkening to greyish orange (5B3), brownish orange (5C5), yellowish brown (5D4); margins variable sometimes within a single collection, adnate to somewhat detached, distinct, abrupt, thick, raised, felty-silky, brownish yellow, usually darker than hymenophore, or appressed, adnate, thinning out with edges white, fimbriate, silky to woolly.
Microscopic structures—Hyphal system monomitic but appearing dimitic from sclerified hyphae in subiculum and pegs. Hyphal pegs arising deep in subiculum as a compact, agglutinated fascicle composed of an inner core of brown pigmented, sclerified subicular hyphae, then above the hymenium hyphae differentiating into dikaryophyses along sides and at apices, often encrusted, sometimes terminal dikaryophyses colorless and thin-walled throughout or yellow to brownish yellow and walls thickening toward base. Subiculum up to 150 (–700) μm thick, a partially agglutinated tissue composed of a dense, dark yellow-to-brown tissue of sclerified hyphae arranged parallel to substrate, giving rise to hyphal pegs, hyphae 2–4 μm diam, clamps inconspicuous or degraded, sparsely branched, walls yellow to brownish yellow, thin to 1 μm thick, smooth. Subhymenium up to 80 μm thick, a moderately dense, colorless tissue of loosely interwoven hyphae turning into hymenium, composed of hyphae, 2.5–3.5 μm in diameter, clamped, walls thin, colorless, smooth. Hymenium 25–100 μm thick, a dense palisade of dikaryophyses enclosing cystidia and basidia. Dikaryophyses abundant, 35–60 × 3.5–5 μm, clamped at base, simple or with short nodulose or knobby branches, walls colorless, thin, smooth. Cystidia scattered to numerous, embedded to barely projecting, cylindrical, clavate, or subfusiform, often with a stalk, apices rounded, subacute or bulbous, 40–70 × 7–13 μm, clamped at base, walls colorless, thin, smooth, with homogenous contents. Basidia longitudinally septate, four-celled, embedded with only tips of sterigmata observed beyond hymenium, ellipsoid to ovoid, (11–) 13–23 × 8.5–11 μm, with a small, basal clamp, 4-sterigmate, rarely with 2 or 3 sterigmata, walls colorless, thin, smooth. Basidiospores cylindrical, often ventrally depressed, (10–) 11–13.5 (–15) × 5–6 μm, L = 12.5 μm, W= 5.5 μm, Q = 2.3–2.4 (60/2), colorless, thin-walled, smooth, IKI–, CB–, germination sometimes observed.
Distribution—Australia, Cambodia, China, Nepal, New Zealand, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Vietnam.
Type specimens examined—Australia, New South Wales, Moruya, on bare wood, W.N. Cheesman, 1914 (K(M)4481, holotype of H. cheesmanii); Sri Lanka, Central Province, on wood December 1868, G.H.K.Thwaites 982 (K(M)132234, holotype of Kneiffia discolor); Vietnam, Hanoi, on bark, 22 June 1911, Dupont no. 676 (FH–HUH00940160, holotype of H. roseola); Vietnam, Tonkin, Thanh Hoa Ngoc Au (Than Hoa), on bark and wood, 29 January 1892, H.F. Bon 5062 (FH-HUH01093670, holotype of H. tonkiniana).
Representative specimens examined—Australia, Victoria, Gippsland Highland, Tarra Valley, on fallen branches of orangewood, 12 Sept 1955, K. Healy, N.W.M. Walters, & E. DaCosta (MEL-2313649, as H. discolor); Cambodia, Reserv foretrie de Campong Chhnang, on (bark of) dead branches, July 1921, P.A. Pételot 360 (FH-HUH00940161; BPI-719711, as H. roseola); China, Gansu Province, Tianshui County, Maijishan Forest Park, on fallen angiosperm branch, 8 August 2015, He 2488 (BJFC 020941); Guangxi Autonomous Region, Tianlin County, Cenwanglaoshan Nature Reserve, on dead angiosperm branch, 8 July 2017, He 4708 (BJFC 024227, CFMR); Huanjiang County, Mulun Nature Reserve, on rotten angiosperm trunk, 10 July 2017, He 4763 (BJFC 024281); Guizhou Province, Libo County, Maolan Nature Reserve, on dead angiosperm branch, 14 June 2016, He 3771 (BJFC 022270); 11 July 2017, He 4778 (BJFC 024295); Hainan Province, Wanning County, Xinglong Botanical Garden, on fallen angiosperm trunk, 19 March 2016, He 3610 (BJFC 022108); Wuzhishan County, Wuzhishan Nature Reserve, on dead angiosperm branch, 10 June 2016, He 3947 (BJFC 022449); Hunan Province, Zhangjiajie County, Zhangjiajie Nature Reserve, on fallen angiosperm tree, 7 July 2015, He 2297 (BJFC 020752); Yizhang County, Mangshan Nature Reserve, on dead angiosperm branch, 26 July 2016, He 4008a (BJFC 023446); Taiwan, Nantou County, Jenai Township, Entrance of Southern Tungyenshan, alt. 1700 m, on fallen angiosperm trunk, 7 December 2016, He 4584 (BJFC 024026); Xizang Autonomous Region, Linzhi County, Lulang, on dead angiosperm trunk, 17 September 2010, He 321 (BJFC 021980, CFMR); on dead Hippophae branch, 17 September 2010, He 331 (BJFC 021982); Yunnan Province, Jingdong County, Ailaoshan Nature Reserve, on dead angiosperm branch, 25 August 2015, He 2620 (BJFC 021066, CFMR); Baoshan County, Gaoligongshan Nature Reserve, Baihualing, on dead Quercus branch, He 3401 (BJFC 021797); Nepal, Chitwan National Park, Narayani River, Island Jungle Resort, on hardwood twig, 15 March 2008, T. Rödel, NP/13 (Rödel private herbarium, CFMR); New Zealand, Weraroa, Wellington, on fallen log, 30 October 1919, G.H. Cunningham 353 (BPI-719737, as H. tenuicula); Philippines, Luzon, Mt. Maquiling, on dead wood, 28 Oct 1920, F. Obias, ex Herb. O.A. Reinking no. 10516 (BPI-719764, FH-HUH00940152, as H. leveillei); Thaliand, Chiang Rai Province, Doi Mae Salong, on dead angiosperm branch, 22 July 2016, He4069 (BJFC 023510); Chiang Mai Province, Doi Saket, on dead angiosperm branch, 24 July 2016, He 4107 (BJFC 023549); Vietnam, Thac Mai Preservation Park, lowland rain forest Dipterocarp, on dead angiosperm branch, 14 October 2017, He 5211 (BJFC 024729); Tonkin, Cho-Ganh, sur branchettes de Flamboyant, 13 Mar 1914, L. Duport no. 14 (FH-HUH00940159, as H. roseola); sur “Dong” (bark of twigs), Janvier 1922, M. Duport no. 127 (FH-HUH00940157, as H. roseola) and M. Duport no. 132 pp (FH-HUH01093669, as H. tonkiniana).
Notes—Eichleriella discolor is characterized by subceraceous-to-chalky or cretaceous basidiomes, small hyphal pegs arising from subiculum and composed of brownish yellow, sclerified hyphae and dikaryophyses, and 4-sterigmate basidia. The margin of specimens can be quite variable, and hyphal pegs are brittle, often breaking off to expose its dark brown interior. The size of the basidiospores is also variable and may reflect the number of sterigmata produced by the basidia. Its hyphal system was described as pseudodimitic [36], because the hyphae in the subiculum and hyphal peg are brownish yellow with slightly thickened walls. On close inspection, however, rare clamp connections were observed on these sclerified hyphae.
Eichleriella discolor is widely distributed from East and Southeast Asia to New Zealand and has been described several times. The synonymy presented above was reached after studying type specimens and mostly supports previous reports except that the synonymy of H. roseola with K. discolor is new. Bodman [16] considered K. discolor and H. tonkiniana to be synonyms but recognized H. roseola as a distinct species. Earlier, Roberts and Spooner [36] proposed the synonymy of K. discolor and H. cheesmanii.
  • Eichleriella sinensis (Teng) S.H. He & Nakasone, comb. nov. Figure 11C,D
MycoBank: MB847448
Heterochaete sinensis Teng, Sinensia 7: 530, 1935.
= Eichleriella aculeobasidiata Hui Wang, Dong-Qiong Wang & C.L. Zhao, Kew Bull. 77: 326, 2022.
Fruiting body—Basidiomes widely effused, resupinate, first as small orbicular colonies, later confluent, adnate, moderately thick, (150–) 200–450 (–500) μm thick, firm, subceraceous to ceraceous. Hymenophore distinctly odontoid from hyphal pegs, (4–) 5–8 (–10) per mm, with smooth areas among pegs; pegs single, conical, terete, concolorous to brown, brittle, breaking off to reveal dark brown trama overall surface yellowish white (4A2), greyish yellow (4B3), pale orange (6A3), greyish orange (6B4), brownish orange (6C4), light brown [6D(4–5)] to dark brown (7F8), black in KOH then fading on drying; margins distinct, abrupt, detached, sometimes incurved, pale orange (5B3), light orange (5A4), greyish orange [5B(4-5)], often darker than hymenophore, with sterile edges up to 1 mm wide, even to scalloped, felty-woolly, rarely fimbriate.
Microscopic structures—Hyphal system dimitic with clamps on generative hyphae and thick-walled skeletal hyphae. Hyphal pegs arising from upper subiculum, 80–140 (–160) × (30–) 40–50 (–80) μm, a tight fascicle of non-agglutinated skeletal hyphae and coarse, colorless crystals, along sides and at apex skeletal hyphae differentiating into branched, thin-walled dikaryophyses. Subiculum up to 400 μm thick, composed of two distinct layers; (1) a non-agglutinated tissue, up to 200 μm thick, of dense, non-agglutinated, skeletal hyphae and degraded generative hyphae arranged parallel to substrate; (2) an interwoven tissue of non-agglutinated primarily skeletal hyphae and degraded subicular hyphae turning into hymenium, up to 250 μm thick, often with embedded, coarse colorless crystals; subicular hyphae mostly collapsed, 2–3 μm diam, clamped, walls colorless, thin; skeletal hyphae 2–4.5 μm diam, aseptate, sometimes with adventitious septa, rarely branched, walls pale yellow to brownish yellow, up to 2 μm thick, smooth. Subhymenium not observed. Hymenium up to 80 μm thick, a dense palisade of dikaryophyses enclosing cystidia and basidia. Dikaryophyses abundant, 30–60 × 3–4.5 μm, clamped at base, with short, knobby branches, walls colorless, thin, smooth. Cystidia numerous, embedded, cylindrical, clavate, or subfusiform, often stalked, apices rounded or subacute, 15–50 (–70) × 7.5–9 (–12.5) μm, clamped at base, walls colorless, thin, smooth, with homogenous contents. Basidia embedded, ovoid to ellipsoid, longitudinally septate, four-celled, 15–20 (–25) × 9–11 (–12.5) μm, with a small, basal clamp, 4-sterigmate, walls colorless, thin, smooth. Basidiospores scarce-to-numerous, cylindrical-to-narrowly cylindrical, sometimes ventrally depressed, (9.5–) 10.5–16 (–18) × (4.5–) 5.5–7 μm, L = 15 μm, W = 6.5 μm, Q = 2.2–2.4 (60/2), walls colorless, thin, smooth, IKI–, CB–, germination sometimes observed.
Distribution—Pantropical and subtropical: Australia, China, Indonesia, Japan, New Zealand, Philippines.
Specimens examined—Australia, Queensland, Cook, Innisfail, Joint Tropical Research Unit, on fallen, rotten twigs, 5 September 1972, N.E.M. Walters (MEL-231548, with E. discolor); China, Anhui Province, Chiu-hua-shan, (on small twigs), 18 September 1933, S.C.Teng 698 (paratype, BPI-719773); Fujian Province, Wuyishan County, Wuyishan Nature Reserve, Huanggangshan, on fallen angiosperm branch, 21 October 2005, Dai 7361 (BJFC 016640); Jian’ou County, Wanmulin Nature Reserve, on dead angiosperm branch, 19 August 2016, He 4547 (BJFC 023988); Guangxi Autonomous Region: Jinxiu County, Dayaoshan Nature Reserve, Shengtang Mountains, on rotten angiosperm trunk, 15 July 2017, He 4862 (BJFC 024381); Yinshan Park, on dead angiosperm branch, 16 July 2017, He 4900 (BJFC 024419); Guizhou Province, Suiyang County, Kuankuoshui Nature Reserve, on fallen angiosperm trunk, 26 November 2014, Dai 15044 (BJFC 018157); Libo County, Maolan Nature Reserve, on dead angiospermic branch, 14 June 2016, He 3761 (BJFC 022260, CFMR); Hainan Province, Baisha County, Yinggeling Nature Reserve, on dead angiosperm branch, 9 June 2016, He 3890 (BJFC 022392) and He 3892 (BJFC 022394); Henan Province, Xinyang County, Jigongshan Nature Reserve, on fallen Fagus branch, 27 October 2014, He 20141027-4 (BJFC 019266); Hubei Province, Wufeng County, on dead angiosperm branch, 14 August 2017, He 5025 (BJFC 024543); 15 August 2017, He 5057 (BJFC 024575); Hunan Province, Heng-shan, 22 September 1933, C.I. Shen 559 (paratype, BPI-719724); Dong’an County, Shunhangshan Nature Reserve, on dead angiospermic branch, 13 July 2015, He 2388 (BJFC 020842, CFMR); Liuyang County, Daweishan Forest Park, on dead angiosperm branch, 10 July 2015, He 2330 (BJFC 020784); Jilin Province: Jiaohe County, on dead angiosperm branch, 3 Sep. 2017, He 5145 (BJFC 024663). Jiangxi Province, Yifeng County, Guanshan Nature Reserve, on fallen angiosperm trunk, 9 August 2016, He 4185 (BJFC 023627); on dead angiosperm branch, 9 August 2016, He 4196 (BJFC 023638); Anyuan County, Sanbaishan Forest Park, on dead angiosperm branch, 15 August 2016, He 4425 (BJFC 023866); Sichuan Province, Ya’an, Bifengxia Forest Park, on bark of living Cunninghamia, 22 September 2012, He 20120922-4 (BJFC 014644); Qionglai County, Tiantaishan Forest Park, on dead angiosperm tree, 23 September 2012, He 20120923-18 (BJFC 014665); Taiwan, Nantou County, Jenai Township, Entrance of Southern Tungyenshan, alt. 1700 m, on dead angiosperm branch, 7 December 2016, He 4598 (BJFC 024040); Yunnan Province, Xichou County, Lotus pond, on fallen angiosperm branch, 25 July 2014, He 20140725-12 (BJFC 019206); Binchuan County, Jizhushan Forest Park, on dead angiosperm branch, 28 October 2017, He 5327 (BJFC 024845); Zhejiang Province, Tunglu, on dead twigs, 26 November 1933, S.Q. Deng 699 (paratype, BPI-719723; CUP-CH-000942); Indonesia, West Java, 1921, C. Hartley (BPI-719743, as H. tenuicula); Japan, no location data, K. Aoshima 10751 (NY-00461157, as H. tenuicula); New Zealand, Auckland, Mt. Albert Rd., on Tecoma sp., 6 November 1948, G.L.S. Chamberlain (PDD-24331, as H. tenuicula); Philippines, Quizon, Bataan, Lamae, on dead twigs, 30 November 1960, F.R. Vyenco (NY00461200, as H. delicata); Diliman, U.P. Campus, on bark, 7 August 1959, F.R. Vyenco (NY-00461151, as H. delicata); Los Banos, Luzon, Mt. Maquiling, on Cryptocarya dead branches, 30 July 1918, O.A. Reinking 7587 (BPI-719745, as H. tenuicula).
Notes—Eichleriella sinensis is similar to E. tenuicula except for the 4-sterigmate basidia and cylindrical basidiospores, average Q values 2.2–2.4, compared with allantoid basidiospores, average Q value 3.3 of the latter. The two taxa also overlap in distribution in Asia, Australia, New Zealand, and the Philippines but E. tenuicula has a pantropical distribution. Basidiospores were scarce in most of the specimens examined. Although the type specimen of H. sinensis was not examined, three paratypes were studied.
In the phylogenetic tree of Eichleriella (Figure 3), E. sinensis, E. tenuicula and E. delicata are closely related but formed distinct lineages. The recently described species, E. aculeobasidiata Hui Wang, Dong Qiong Wang & C.L. Zhao, has 2-sterigmate basidia but nested within the E. sinensis lineage [28]. Close inspection of basidia of the type specimens of E. aculeobasidiata needs to be carried out, but at present we accept E. aculeobasidiata as a synonym of E. sinensis based on phylogenetic analyses and overall morphology. A sample from Japan identified as Heterochaete delicata (TUFC33717) in GenBank also nested within the E. sinensis lineage instead of the E. delicata lineage in our phylogenetic tree (Figure 3).
MycoBank: MB847449
Type—China, Guizhou Province, Libo County, Maolan Nature Reserve, on dead but still attached angiosperm branch, 11 July 2017, He 4773 (BJFC 024290, holotype, CFMR, isotype).
Etymology—refers to the type locality in Maolan Nature Reserve, Guizhou Province, southwestern China.
Fruiting body—Basidiomes annual, resupinate, effused, closely adnate, inseparable from substrate, coriaceous, first as small, scattered colonies, later confluent up to 10 cm long, 2.5 cm wide, up to 600 µm thick in section (hyphal pegs excluded). Hymenophore odontoid, irpicoid to subporoid from hyphal pegs, light orange [5A(4–5)], greyish orange [5B(4–6)] to brownish orange [5C(4–6)], not cracked; hyphal pegs densely arranged, single or fused, with blunt tips; margin abrupt, sterile, white (6A1) when juvenile, becoming concolorous with hymenophore with age.
Microscopic structures—Hyphal system monomitic-to-subdimitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections. Subiculum thick, pale yellow; hyphae colorless to pale yellow, slightly to distinctly thick-walled, rarely branched, septate, densely interwoven, smooth or encrusted with small granules, 2–3.5 µm in diam. Hyphal pegs originated from base of hymenium, pale yellow, up to 240 × 160 µm; hyphae similar to those of subiculum, agglutinated, vertically arranged, with tips heavily encrusted with crystals. Cystidia absent. Dikaryophyses numerous, colorless, thin-walled, encrusted, not branched or slightly branched at the tip. Basidia ovoid to subglobose, longitudinally septate, four-celled, without enucleate stalk, 18–25 × 10–15 µm. Basidiospores cylindrical with an apiculus, sometimes slightly curved, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, IKI–, CB–, containing one or two globules, capable of germinating by repetition, 12–15 × 6–7.5 µm, L = 16.5 µm, W = 7 µm, Q = 1.9–2 (n = 90/3).
Additional specimens examined—China, Guizhou Province, Libo County, Maolan Nature Reserve, on bark of dead angiosperm tree, 11 July 2017, He 4786 (BJFC 024303, CFMR); on dead but still attached angiosperm branch, 15 June 2016, He 3788 (BJFC 022287, CFMR).
Notes—Heteroradulum maolanense is characterized by its odontioid, irpicoid-to-subporoid hymenophore with single or fused hyphal pegs, encrusted hyphae and cylindrical basidiospores. The species is similar to H. mussooriense which differs in having wider ellipsoid-to-ovoid basidiospores (12–15 × 9–10 µm, [16]). Heteroradulum australiense L.W. Zhou, Q.Z. Li & S.L. Liu like H. maolanense has an odontoid hymenophore but differs in having both simple- and nodose-septate generative hyphae and longer basidiospores (15–20 × 5–7 µm, [20]). In the phylogenetic tree, the two samples of H. maolanense formed a distinct, strongly supported (Figure 4).
  • Heteroradulum mussooriense (Bodman) S.H. He, T. Nie & Yue Li, comb. nov.
                                        Figure 12B
MycoBank: MB847450
Heterochaete mussooriensis Bodman, Lloydia 15: 221, 1952.
= Heteroradulum semis Spirin & Malysheva, Fungal Biology 121: 712, 2017.
Grammatus semis (Spirin & Malysheva) H.S. Yuan & Decock, MycoKeys 35: 35, 2018.
Specimens studied—China, Hubei Province, Shenlongjia Nature Reserve, on fallen angiosperm branch, 16 October 2016, Dai 17193 (BJFC 023291, CFMR); Yunnan Province, Binchuan County, Jizhushan Forest Park, on fallen angiosperm branch, 30 August 2015, He 2867 (BJFC 021301, CFMR); 26 November 2015, He 3168 (BJFC 021563, CFMR); 28 October 2017, He 5306 (BJFC 024824, CFMR) and He 5331 (BJFC 024849); Yongde County, Daxueshan Nature Reserve, on Quercus stump, 28 August 2015, He 2756 (BJFC 021194).
Notes—Heterochaete mussooriensis was described from Mussoorie, northwestern India, and then also reported in China [16,37]. The species is characterized by its subporoid hymenophore formed by numerous densely arranged spines, large subclavate basidia and broadly ellipsoid-to-ovoid basidiospores [16]. Malysheva and Spirin [15] described Heteroradulum semis from northeastern China and Japan. However, the protologue and our phylogenetic analyses show that H. semis is conspecific with Heteroradulum mussooriensis.
  • Heteroradulum labyrinthinum (H.S. Yuan & Decock) L.W. Zhou, MycoKeys 86: 97, 2022.
                                        Figure 5F and Figure 12C,D
Grammatus labyrinthinus H.S. Yuan & Decock, MycoKeys 35: 32, 2018.
Specimens examined—China, Guangxi Autonomous Region, Longzhou County, Nonggang Nature Reserve, on fallen angiosperm branch, 22 July 2012, He 20120722-1 (BJFC 014502, CFMR); Guizhou Province, Chishui County, Suoluo Nature Reserve, on fallen angiosperm branch, 7 July 2018, He 5431 (BJFC 026492) and He 5439 (BJFC026500).
Notes—Yuan et al. [30] established the genus, Grammatus H.S. Yuan & Decock, based on G. labyrinthinus and proposed the combination G. semis. The genus was later regarded as a synonym of Heteroradulum [20] and is also supported by our phylogenetic analyses (Figure 2). In the phylogenetic tree of Heteroradulum (Figure 4), three species, H. labyrinthinum, H. mussooriense and H. maolanense, form a strongly supported clade. Morphologically, the three species have similar and varied hymenophore that can be odontioid, irpicoid to subporoid because of the confluence the hyphal pegs at different growth stages (Figure 12). Heteroradulum labyrinthinum was originally described from tropical areas of Yunnan Province; herein, we report it from Guanxi Autonomous Region and Guizhou Province.

4. Discussion

In this study, we carried out a taxonomic and phylogenetic study of the Auriculariaceae and the genera Eichleriella and Heteroradulum with emphasis on corticioid samples from East and Southeast Asia. We resolved five new lineages represented by a new genus and five new species. In addition, four new combinations are proposed. Previous studies [4,15,21,22,23] and our results demonstrate that the Auriculariaceae is rich in corticioid fungi. However, additional studies are needed to understand the full scope of their diversity in subtropic and tropic regions. Some substrates, such as bamboo, appear to host unusual and undescribed taxa for further investigations. The taxonomy and phylogeny of the Auriculariaceae are far from resolved; however, many described species in Exidiopsis, Heterochaete, and Exidia have not been sequenced or studied critically by morphology. To create a robust family tree, future phylogenetic studies in the Auriculariaceace should include sequence data from multiple loci from a wide array of taxa, including taxa described from the last century, as well as taxa representing other regions of the world.
  • key to corticioid and stereoid genera in Auriculariaceae
1. Hymenophore strictly smooth2
1. Hymenophore smooth, odontoid, irpicoid, or subporoid4
2. Hyphal system dimiticAmphistereum
2. Hyphal system monomitic3
3. Basidiospores cylindrical or ellipsoidHeterocorticium
3. Basidiospores allantoid, distinctly curvedSclerotrema
4. Basidiomes leathery5
4. Basidiomes gelatinous, waxy or crustaceous7
5. Basidiomes resupinate, smooth or with small spinesAlloexidiopsis
5. Basidiomes effused-reflexed, smooth or with distinct spines6
6. With encrusted hyphal endsHeterordulum
6. Without encrusted hyphal endsEichleriella
7. Spines fertileProterochaete
7. Spines (hyphal pegs) sterile8
8. Hyphal pegs heavily covered with crystals9
8. Hyphal pegs smooth10
9. Hyphal pegs covered by angular crystalsCrystallodon
9. Hyphal pegs covered with metuloid cystidiaMetulochaete
10. Basidiospores subglobose, > 9 μm wideHirneolina
10. Basidiospores cylindrical, < 9 μm wide11
11. Hymenophore grayish to brownishAdustochaete
11. Hymenophore pale-coloredExidiopsis

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-H.H.; methodology, Y.L. and T.N.; performing the experiment, Y.L. and T.N.; formal analysis, Y.L.; validation, Y.L., T.N., K.K.N., H.-J.L. and S.-H.H.; resources, S.-H.H. and K.K.N.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L. and T.N.; writing—review and editing, S.-H.H. and K.K.N.; visualization, Y.L. and T.N.; supervision, S.-H.H. and K.K.N.; project administration, S.-H.H.; funding acquisition, S.-H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos. 32070005; 31750001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank curators of the following herbaria for the loan of specimens: BPI, FH, K, MEL, NY, PDD, and Thomas Rödel for a loan from his private fungarium.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Weiß, M.; Oberwinkler, F. Phylogenetic relationships in Auriculariales and related groups—Hypotheses derived from nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycol. Res. 2001, 105, 403–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wells, K.; Bandoni, R.J.; Lim, S.R.; Berbee, M.L. Observations on some species of Myxarium and reconsideration of the Auriculariaceae and Hyaloriaceae (Auriculariales). In Frontiers in Basidiomycote Mycology; Agerer, R., Piepenbring, M., Blanz, P., Eds.; IHW Verlag: Eching, Germany, 2004; pp. 237–248. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hibbett, D.S.; Bauer, R.; Binder, M.; Giachini, A.J.; Hosaka, K.; Justo, A.; Larsson, E.; Larsson, K.H.; Lawrey, J.D.; Miettinen, O.; et al. Agaricomycetes. In Systematics and Evolution Part A; McLaughlin, D.J., Spatafora, J.W., Eds.; The Mycota. VII; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 373–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, S.-L.; Shen, Z.-Q.; Li, Q.-Z.; Liu, X.-Y.; Zhou, L.-W. Alloexidiopsis gen. nov., A Revision of Generic Delimitation in Auriculariales (Basidiomycota). Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 894641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wu, F.; Yuan, Y.; Malysheva, V.F.; Du, P.; Dai, Y.C. Species clarification of the most important and cultivated Auricularia mushroom “Heimuer”: Evidence from morphological and molecular data. Phytotaxa 2014, 186, 241–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, F.; Yuan, Y.; Rivoire, B.; Dai, Y.-C. Phylogeny and diversity of the Auricularia mesenterica (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota) complex. Mycol. Prog. 2015, 14, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, F.; Yuan, Y.; He, S.-H.; Bandara, A.R.; Hyde, K.D.; Malysheva, V.; Li, D.-W.; Dai, Y.-C. Global diversity and taxonomy of the Auricularia auricula-judae complex (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota). Mycol. Prog. 2015, 14, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, F.; Tohtirjap, A.; Fan, L.-F.; Zhou, L.-W.; Alvarenga, R.L.M.; Gibertoni, T.B.; Dai, Y.-C. Global Diversity and Updated Phylogeny of Auricularia (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota). J. Fungi 2021, 7, 933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kout, J.; Wu, F. Revealing the Cryptic Diversity of Wood-Inhabiting Auricularia (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota) in Europe. Forests 2022, 13, 532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ye, S.-Y.; Zhang, Y.-B.; Wu, F.; Liu, H.-X. Multi-locus phylogeny reveals two new species of Exidia (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota) from China. Mycol. Prog. 2020, 19, 859–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, S.R.; Thorn, R.G. Exidia qinghaiensis, a new species from China. Mycoscience 2021, 6, 2212–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Miettinen, O.; Spirin, V.; Niemela, T. Notes on the GenusAporpium (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota), with a New Species from Temperate Europe. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 2012, 49, 359–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhou, L.-W.; Dai, Y.-C. Phylogeny and taxonomy of poroid and lamellate genera in the Auriculariales (Basidiomycota). Mycologia 2013, 105, 1219–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sotome, K.; Maekawa, N.; Nakagiri, A.; Lee, S.S.; Hattori, T. Taxonomic study of Asian species of poroid Auriculariales. Mycol. Prog. 2014, 13, 987–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Malysheva, V.; Spirin, V. Taxonomy and phylogeny of the Auriculariales (Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota) with stereoid basidiocarps. Fungal Biol. 2017, 121, 689–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bodman, M.C. A taxonomic study of the genus Heterochaete. Lloydia 1952, 15, 193–233. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wells, K. Studies of Some Tremellaceae. IV. Exidiopsis. Mycologia 1961, 53, 317–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wells, K.; Raitviir, A. The Species of Exidiopsis (Tremellaceae) of the U.S.S.R. Mycologia 1977, 69, 987–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wells, K.; Raitviir, A. The Species of Eichleriella (Tremellaceae) of the U.S.S.R. Mycologia 1980, 72, 564–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Q.-Z.; Liu, S.-L.; Wang, X.-W.; May, T.W.; Zhou, L.-W. Redelimitation of Heteroradulum (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota) with H. australiense sp. nov. Mycokeys 2022, 86, 87–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Spirin, V.; Malysheva, V.; Miettinen, O.; Vlasák, J.; Alvarenga, R.L.M.; Gibertoni, T.B.; Ryvarden, L.; Larsson, K.-H. On Protomerulius and Heterochaetella (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota). Mycol. Prog. 2019, 18, 1079–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alvarenga, R.L.M.; Spirin, V.; Malysheva, V.; Gibertoni, T.B.; Larsson, K.-H. Two new genera and six other novelties in Heterochaete sensu lato (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota). Botany 2019, 97, 439–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Alvarenga, R.L.M.; Gibertoni, T.B. Crystallodon Alvarenga gen. nov., A New Genus of the Auriculariales from the Neotropics. Cryptogam. Mycol. 2021, 42, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, Y.; Nakasone, K.K.; Chen, C.-C.; Zhao, C.-L.; Cao, T.; Yuan, H.-S.; He, S.-H. Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Cystostereaceae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota): A New Genus, Five New Species, and Three New Combinations. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hyde, K.D.; Dong, Y.; Phookamsak, R.; Jeewon, R.; Bhat, D.J.; Jones, E.B.G.; Liu, N.G.; Abeywickrama, P.D.; Mapook, A.; Wei, D.P.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 1151–1276: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 2020, 100, 5–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, J.-J.; Zhao, C.-L.; Liu, C.-M. The Morphological Characteristics and Phylogenetic Analyses Revealed an Additional Taxon in Heteroradulum (Auriculariales). Diversity 2022, 14, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guan, Q.-X.; Liu, C.-M.; Zhao, T.-J.; Zhao, C.-L. Heteroradulum yunnanensis sp. nov. (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota) evidenced by morphological characters and phylogenetic analyses in China. Phytotaxa 2020, 437, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, H.; Wang, D.-Q.; Zhao, C.-L. Eichleriella aculeobasidiata sp. nov. (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota) evidenced by morphological characters and phylogenetic analyses in China. Kew Bull. 2022, 77, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, X.-F.; Shen, S.; Zhao, C.-L. Morphological and molecular identification of a new species of Eichleriella (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota) in China. Phytotaxa 2019, 404, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yuan, H.-S.; Lu, X.; Decock, C. Molecular and morphological evidence reveal a new genus and species in Auriculariales from tropical China. Mycokeys 2018, 35, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Spirin, V.; Malysheva, V.; Roberts, P.; Trichies, G.; Savchenko, A.; Larsson, K.-H. A convolute diversity of the Auriculariales (Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota) with sphaeropedunculate basidia. Nord. J. Bot. 2019, 37, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Phookamsak, R.; Hyde, K.D.; Jeewon, R.; Bhat, D.J.; Jones, E.B.G.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Raspé, O.; Karunarathna, S.C.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Hongsanan, S.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 929–1035: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungi. Fungal Divers. 2019, 95, 1–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Martin, G.W. The Tremellales of the north central United States and adjacent Canada. Univ. Iowa Stud. Nat. Hist. 1944, 18, 1–88. [Google Scholar]
  34. Larsson, K.-H. Re-thinking the classification of corticioid fungi. Mycol. Res. 2007, 111, 1040–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Roberts, P. Caribbean heterobasidiomycetes: 3. British Virgin Islands. Mycotaxon 2008, 105, 137–147. [Google Scholar]
  36. Roberts, P.; Spooner, B.M. Heterobasidiomycetes from the Kimberley Region, Western Australia. Kew Bull. 2007, 62, 153–158. [Google Scholar]
  37. Liu, B. Flora Fungorum Sinicorum; Volume 2 Tremellales et Dacrymycetales; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1992; p. 151. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Representative taxa of Auriculariaceae. (A). Auricularia cornea Ehrenb.; (B). Exidia sp.; (C). Elmerina sp.; (D). Alloexidiopsis calcea (Pers.) L.W. Zhou and S.L. Liu; (E). Eichleriella crocata (Pat.) Spirin and Malysheva; (F). Heteroradulum kmetii.
Figure 1. Representative taxa of Auriculariaceae. (A). Auricularia cornea Ehrenb.; (B). Exidia sp.; (C). Elmerina sp.; (D). Alloexidiopsis calcea (Pers.) L.W. Zhou and S.L. Liu; (E). Eichleriella crocata (Pat.) Spirin and Malysheva; (F). Heteroradulum kmetii.
Jof 09 00318 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of MP analysis from the concatenated ITS-28S sequences of Auriculariaceae taxa. Branches are labelled with parsimony bootstrap values (≥ 50%, first), likelihood bootstrap values (≥ 50%, second), and Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥ 0.95, third). New species and new combinations are set in bold.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of MP analysis from the concatenated ITS-28S sequences of Auriculariaceae taxa. Branches are labelled with parsimony bootstrap values (≥ 50%, first), likelihood bootstrap values (≥ 50%, second), and Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥ 0.95, third). New species and new combinations are set in bold.
Jof 09 00318 g002
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of ML analysis from the concatenated ITS-28S sequences of Eichleriella species. Branches are labelled with parsimony bootstrap values (≥ 50%, first), likelihood bootstrap values (≥ 50%, second), and Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥ 0.95, third). New species (pink) and new combinations (orange) are highlighted and set in bold.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of ML analysis from the concatenated ITS-28S sequences of Eichleriella species. Branches are labelled with parsimony bootstrap values (≥ 50%, first), likelihood bootstrap values (≥ 50%, second), and Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥ 0.95, third). New species (pink) and new combinations (orange) are highlighted and set in bold.
Jof 09 00318 g003
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree of ML analysis of the concatenated ITS-28S sequences of Heteroradulum species. Branches are labelled with parsimony bootstrap values (≥ 50%, first), likelihood bootstrap values (≥ 50%, second), and Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥ 0.95, third). New species (pink) and new combinations (orange) are highlighted and set in bold.
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree of ML analysis of the concatenated ITS-28S sequences of Heteroradulum species. Branches are labelled with parsimony bootstrap values (≥ 50%, first), likelihood bootstrap values (≥ 50%, second), and Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥ 0.95, third). New species (pink) and new combinations (orange) are highlighted and set in bold.
Jof 09 00318 g004
Figure 5. Micrographs of basidia and basidiospores (in phloxine and KOH). Scale bar = 10 µm. (A). Heterocorticium bambusicola (holotype, He 4236, BJFC 023678); (B). Heterocorticium latisporum (holotype, He 20120923-20, BJFC 014667); (C). Eichleriella alpina (holotype, He 20120916-1, BJFC 014581); (D). Eichleriella bambusicola (holotype, He 4073, BJFC 023514); (E). Heteroradulum maolanense (holotype, He 4773, BJFC 024290); (F). Heteroradulum labyrinthinum (He 20120722-1, BJFC 014502).
Figure 5. Micrographs of basidia and basidiospores (in phloxine and KOH). Scale bar = 10 µm. (A). Heterocorticium bambusicola (holotype, He 4236, BJFC 023678); (B). Heterocorticium latisporum (holotype, He 20120923-20, BJFC 014667); (C). Eichleriella alpina (holotype, He 20120916-1, BJFC 014581); (D). Eichleriella bambusicola (holotype, He 4073, BJFC 023514); (E). Heteroradulum maolanense (holotype, He 4773, BJFC 024290); (F). Heteroradulum labyrinthinum (He 20120722-1, BJFC 014502).
Jof 09 00318 g005
Figure 6. Basidiomes of Heterocorticium bambusicola. Scale bars: (A–H) = 1 cm. (A). He 3341 (BJFC 021736); (B). He 3344 (BJFC 021739); (C). He 3359 (BJFC 021754); (D). He 4234 (BJFC023676); (E). He 4604 (BJFC 024046); (F). He 4607 (BJFC 024049); (G). He 6293 (BJFC 033237); (H). He 6435 (BJFC 033379).
Figure 6. Basidiomes of Heterocorticium bambusicola. Scale bars: (A–H) = 1 cm. (A). He 3341 (BJFC 021736); (B). He 3344 (BJFC 021739); (C). He 3359 (BJFC 021754); (D). He 4234 (BJFC023676); (E). He 4604 (BJFC 024046); (F). He 4607 (BJFC 024049); (G). He 6293 (BJFC 033237); (H). He 6435 (BJFC 033379).
Jof 09 00318 g006
Figure 7. Heterocorticium bambusicola (from the holotype, He 4236, BJFC 023678). Scale bars: (A–D) = 10 µm. (A). Basidiospores; (B). Basidia; (C). Dikaryophyses; (D). Generative hyphae.
Figure 7. Heterocorticium bambusicola (from the holotype, He 4236, BJFC 023678). Scale bars: (A–D) = 10 µm. (A). Basidiospores; (B). Basidia; (C). Dikaryophyses; (D). Generative hyphae.
Jof 09 00318 g007
Figure 8. Heterocorticium latisporum (from the holotype, He 20120923-20, BJFC 014667). Scale bars: (A) = 1 cm; (B) = 10 µm. (A). Basidiomes; (B). A cross section of the basidiome.
Figure 8. Heterocorticium latisporum (from the holotype, He 20120923-20, BJFC 014667). Scale bars: (A) = 1 cm; (B) = 10 µm. (A). Basidiomes; (B). A cross section of the basidiome.
Jof 09 00318 g008
Figure 9. Eichleriella alpina (from the holotype, He 20120916-1, BJFC 014581). Scale bars: (A) = 1 cm; (BD) = 10 µm. (A). Basidiomes; (B). Basidiospores; (C). Basidia; (D). A cross section of the basidiome.
Figure 9. Eichleriella alpina (from the holotype, He 20120916-1, BJFC 014581). Scale bars: (A) = 1 cm; (BD) = 10 µm. (A). Basidiomes; (B). Basidiospores; (C). Basidia; (D). A cross section of the basidiome.
Jof 09 00318 g009
Figure 10. Eichleriella bambusicola (from the holotype, He 4073, BJFC 023514). Scale bars: (A) = 1 cm; (B–D) = 10 µm. (A). Basidiomes; (B). Basidiospores; (C). Basidia; (D). A cross section of the basidiome.
Figure 10. Eichleriella bambusicola (from the holotype, He 4073, BJFC 023514). Scale bars: (A) = 1 cm; (B–D) = 10 µm. (A). Basidiomes; (B). Basidiospores; (C). Basidia; (D). A cross section of the basidiome.
Jof 09 00318 g010
Figure 11. Basidiomes of Eichleriella species. Scale bars: (A–D) = 1 cm. (A). E. delicata (He 3469, BJFC 021866); (B). E. discolor (He 4763, BJFC 024281); (C). E. sinensis (He 4185, BJFC 023627); (D). E. sinensis (He 5392, BJFC 026453).
Figure 11. Basidiomes of Eichleriella species. Scale bars: (A–D) = 1 cm. (A). E. delicata (He 3469, BJFC 021866); (B). E. discolor (He 4763, BJFC 024281); (C). E. sinensis (He 4185, BJFC 023627); (D). E. sinensis (He 5392, BJFC 026453).
Jof 09 00318 g011
Figure 12. Basidiomes of Heteroradulum species. Scale bars: (A–D) = 1 cm. (A). H. maolanense (holotype, He 4773, BJFC 024290); (B). H. mussooriense (He 5331, BJFC 024849); (C). H. labyrinthinum (He 20120722-1, BJFC 014502); (D). H. labyrinthinum (He 5431, BJFC 026492).
Figure 12. Basidiomes of Heteroradulum species. Scale bars: (A–D) = 1 cm. (A). H. maolanense (holotype, He 4773, BJFC 024290); (B). H. mussooriense (He 5331, BJFC 024849); (C). H. labyrinthinum (He 20120722-1, BJFC 014502); (D). H. labyrinthinum (He 5431, BJFC 026492).
Jof 09 00318 g012
Figure 13. Heteroradulum maolanense (from the holotype, He 4773, BJFC 024290). Scale bars: (A,B) = 10 µm. (A). Basidiospores; (B). A cross section of the basidiome.
Figure 13. Heteroradulum maolanense (from the holotype, He 4773, BJFC 024290). Scale bars: (A,B) = 10 µm. (A). Basidiospores; (B). A cross section of the basidiome.
Jof 09 00318 g013
Table 1. Species and sequences used in the phylogenetic analyses. New taxa are set in bold with type specimens indicated with an asterisk (*).
Table 1. Species and sequences used in the phylogenetic analyses. New taxa are set in bold with type specimens indicated with an asterisk (*).
SpeciesSpecimen No.LocalityGenBank Accession No.Reference
ITS28S
Adustochaete niveaRLMA 531BrazilMN165954MN165989[25]
Adustochaete ravaKHL15526BrazilMK391517MK391526[22]
Alloexidiopsis australiensisLWZ 20180513-22AustraliaOM801933OM801918[4]
Alloexidiopsis calceaLWZ 20180904-14ChinaOM801935OM801920[4]
Alloexidiopsis niveaCLZhao 16280ChinaMZ352941MZ352933[26]
Alloexidiopsis schistaceaLWZ 20200819-21aChinaOM801939OM801932[4]
Alloexidiopsis yunnanensisCLZhao 9132ChinaMT215570MT215566[27]
Amphistereum leveilleanumFP-106715USAKX262119KX262168[15]
Amphistereum schrenkiiHHB 8476USAKX262130KX262178[15]
Aporpium canescensMiettinen 13352.2NorwayJX044152[12]
Aporpium caryaeWD2207JapanAB871751AB871730[14]
Aporpium macroporumNiemela 8488PolandJX044148[12]
Auricularia mesentericaFO 25132GermanyAF291271AF291292[1]
Auricularia mesentericaTUFC12805JapanAB915192AB915191[14]
Auricularia polytrichaTUFC12920JapanAB871752AB871733[14]
Crystallodon subgelatinosumURM93444BrazilMN475884MN475888[23]
Crystallodon subgelatinosumURM93445BrazilMN475885MN475889[23]
Eichleriella aculeobasidiataCLZhao 4422ChinaMZ416783[28]
Eichleriella aculeobasidiataCLZhao 6159ChinaMZ416784[28]
Eichleriella alliciensHe 4055bThailandMH178244Present Study
Eichleriella alliciensHHB 7194USAKX262120KX262169[15]
Eichleriella alpinaHe 20120916-1 *ChinaMH178245MH178268Present Study
Eichleriella bactrianaTAAM 104431UzbekistanKX262138KX262186[15]
Eichleriella bambusicolaDai 6391ChinaMH178246Present Study
Eichleriella bambusicolaHe 4073 *ThailandMH178269Present Study
Eichleriella bambusicolaHe 4168ChinaMH178247MH178270Present Study
Eichleriella crocataHe 2969ChinaMH178248MH178271Present Study
Eichleriella crocataTAAM 101077RussiaKX262100KX262147[15]
Eichleriella delicataFP-140099AustraliaMH178249MH178272Present Study
Eichleriella delicataHe 3469ChinaMH178250MH178273Present Study
Eichleriella desertorumLR 49350NamibiaKX262142KX262190[15]
Eichleriella discolorHe 4584ChinaMH178252MH178275Present Study
Eichleriella discolorHe 4763ChinaMH178253MH178276Present Study
Eichleriella flavidaLR 49412UKKX262137KX262185[15]
Eichleriella leucophaeaLE 303261RussiaKX262111KX262161[15]
Eichleriella macrosporaHe 2189USAMH178251MH178274Present Study
Eichleriella ochraceaSP467242BrazilMK391514[22]
Eichleriella sheariiUSJ 54609Costa RicaAF291284AF291335[1]
Eichleriella siccaOM 17349USAKX262143KX262191[15]
Eichleriella sinensisHe 4196ChinaMH178254MH178277Present Study
Eichleriella sinensisHe 5057ChinaMH178255MH178278Present Study
Eichleriella tenuiculaHe 3483ChinaMH178256MH178279Present Study
Eichleriella tenuiculaLR 17599ThailandKX262141KX262189[15]
Eichleriella xinpingensisCLZhao 836ChinaMK560879MK560883[29]
Eichleriella xinpingensisCLZhao 842ChinaMK560880MK560884[29]
Elmerina cladophoraOM X1902IndonesiaMG757509MG757509[21]
Elmerina hexagonoidesML297MalaysiaAB871754AB871735[14]
Elmerina sclerodontiaOM X3269MalaysiaMG757512MG757512[21]
Exidia glandulosaTUFC34008JapanAB871761AB871742[14]
Exidia pithyaMW 313GermanyAF291275AF291321[1]
Exidiopsis effusaOM 19136FinlandKX262145KX262193[15]
Heterochaete andinaLagerheimEcuadorKX262187[15]
Heterochaete delicataTUFC33717JapanAB871766AB871747[14]
Heterocorticium bambusicolaHe 4236 *ChinaMH178259MH178283Present Study
Heterocorticium bambusicolaHe 4604ChinaMH178260MH178284Present Study
Heterocorticium latisporumHe 20120923-20 *ChinaMH178261MH178285Present Study
Heterocorticium latisporumHe 7540ChinaOQ202164Present Study
Heteroradulum adnatumLR 23453MexicoKX262116KX262165[15]
Heteroradulum australienseLWZ 20180512-25AustraliaMZ325255MZ310425[20]
Heteroradulum australienseLWZ 20180515-26AustraliaMZ325256MZ310426[20]
Heteroradulum deglubensFO 12006GermanyAF291272AF291318[1]
Heteroradulum deglubensLE 38182SwedenKX262112KX262162[15]
Heteroradulum labyrinthinumYuan 1600ChinaKM379139KM379140[30]
Heteroradulum labyrinthinumYuan 1759ChinaKM379137KM379138[30]
Heteroradulum labyrinthinumHe 20120722-1ChinaMH178267MH178291Present Study
Heteroradulum labyrinthinumHe 5431ChinaOQ341430OQ341434Present Study
Heteroradulum labyrinthinumHe 5439ChinaOQ341431OQ341435Present Study
Heteroradulum kmetiiHe 4915ChinaMH178262MH178286Present Study
Heteroradulum kmetiiKmetSlovakiaKX262124KX262173[15]
Heteroradulum maolanenseHe 4773 *ChinaMH178263MH178287Present Study
Heteroradulum maolanenseHe 4786ChinaMH178264MH178288Present Study
Heteroradulum mussoorienseDai 17193ChinaMH178265MH178289Present Study
Heteroradulum mussoorienseHe 2756ChinaMH178266MH178290Present Study
Heteroradulum semisOM 10618ChinaKX262146KX262194[15]
Heteroradulum sp.USJ 55639Costa RicaAF291285AF291336[1]
Hirneolina hirneoloidesUSJ 55480Costa RicaAF291283AF291334[1]
Metulochaete sanctae-catharinaeAM 0678BrazilMK484065MK480575[21]
Proterochaete adustaCN OM10519ChinaMK391519[22]
Proterochaete adustaVS9021CanadaMK391520MK391528[22]
Protoacia delicataVS 4615RussiaMK098923MK098967[31]
Protoacia delicataVS 7824RussiaMK098922MK098966[31]
Protodaedalea foliaceaYuan 5691ChinaJQ764666JQ764644[13]
Protodaedalea hispidaWD 548JapanAB871768AB871749[14]
Sclerotrema griseobrunneumTN 2722CanadaKX262144KX262192[15]
Sclerotrema griseobrunneumVS 7674RussiaKX262140KX262188[15]
Tremellochaete atlanticaURM90199BrazilMG594381MG594383[32]
Tremellochaete cilliataSP467241BrazilMK391523MK391529[22]
Tremellochaete japonicaLE 303446RussiaKX262110KX262160[15]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Nie, T.; Nakasone, K.K.; Li, H.-J.; He, S.-H. Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Corticioid Fungi in Auriculariaceae (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota): A New Genus, Five New Species and Four New Combinations. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9030318

AMA Style

Li Y, Nie T, Nakasone KK, Li H-J, He S-H. Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Corticioid Fungi in Auriculariaceae (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota): A New Genus, Five New Species and Four New Combinations. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(3):318. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9030318

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yue, Ting Nie, Karen K. Nakasone, Hai-Jiao Li, and Shuang-Hui He. 2023. "Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Corticioid Fungi in Auriculariaceae (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota): A New Genus, Five New Species and Four New Combinations" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 3: 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9030318

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop