Abstract
Lupin cultivation worldwide is threatened by anthracnose, a destructive disease caused by the seed- and air-borne fungal pathogen Colletotrichum lupini. In this study we explored the intraspecific diversity of 39 C. lupini isolates collected from different lupin cultivating regions around the world, and representative isolates were screened for their pathogenicity and virulence on white and Andean lupin. Multi-locus phylogeny and morphological characterizations showed intraspecific diversity to be greater than previously shown, distinguishing a total of six genetic groups and ten distinct morphotypes. Highest diversity was found across South America, indicating it as the center of origin of C. lupini. The isolates that correspond to the current pandemic belong to a genetic and morphological uniform group, were globally widespread, and showed high virulence on tested white and Andean lupin accessions. Isolates belonging to the other five genetic groups were mostly found locally and showed distinct virulence patterns. Two highly virulent strains were shown to overcome resistance of advanced white lupin breeding material. This stresses the need to be careful with international seed transports in order to prevent spread of currently confined but potentially highly virulent strains. This study improves our understanding of the diversity, phylogeography and pathogenicity of a member of one of the world’s top 10 plant pathogen genera, providing valuable information for breeding programs and future disease management.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The fungal genus Colletotrichum contains many important plant pathogenic species that cause anthracnose and other pre- and post-harvest diseases in a wide variety of hosts1,2,3,4. Among potential hosts are important fruit, cereal and legume crops such as strawberry5, maize6 and soybean7,8. Besides being of economic importance, Colletotrichum spp. have been widely used as model species to study plant-fungus interactions because of the diversity of lifestyles within this genus9,10,11,12. Colletotrichum is listed in the top 10 of most important fungal plant pathogens worldwide13. Within the genus, members of the Colletotrichum acutatum species complex are notorious and cause disease in many important crops14,15. The most important morphological characteristic for members of this species complex are the acute ends of its conidia14. Discrimination of Colletotrichum species solely based on morphological traits, however, is deemed unreliable due to the few and highly variable characteristics, the strong influence of environmental conditions and the high overlap between species16. Therefore, a polyphasic approach, combining morphological and genetic data is recommended17,18. Multi-locus phylogeny revealed a high diversity within the C. acutatum species complex, showing at least 32 different species divided among five clades14. Although many species within the C. acutatum species complex have a broad host range, Colletotrichum lupini, belonging to clade 1, appears to be highly host specific on lupins (Lupinus)19,20.
Lupin anthracnose caused by C. lupini is the most important disease in lupin cultivation worldwide, affecting all economically important lupin species such as blue (Lupinus angustifolius L.), white (L. albus L.), Andean (L. mutabilis Sweet.), yellow (L. luteus L.) and ornamental lupin (L. polyphyllus Lindl.)20. The disease was first reported in 1912 in Brazil21, but the fungal pathogen was identified much later22. A first outbreak was reported in the 1940–1950s in North America and was followed by a more severe and globally widespread outbreak around the 1980s which is still persisting until this day20. The disease is mainly dispersed via seeds, facilitating rapid spread through international seed transports, and within the crop by rain splash during the growing season23. Even low amounts of initial inoculum can cause total yield losses making this disease highly destructive24,25. Typical symptoms are stem twisting and necrotic lesions on stems and pods (Fig. 1)26. Current disease management is focused on planting certified disease-free seed and chemical protection23,27. However, crop resistance could offer a more sustainable alternative. In blue lupin, anthracnose resistance is controlled by single resistance genes28,29,30, whereas in white, Andean and yellow lupin no such single gene resistance is known and the observed quantitative resistance is considered to be polygenic31,32,33. The increasing demand for plant-based protein is renewing the interest for lupins as a high quality protein crop34,35,36, the current anthracnose pandemic, however, severely hampers cultivation.
The pathogen was first described as Gloesporium lupini, followed by C. gloeosporioides and C. acutatum until it was fully described as C. lupini14,37,38. Currently two genetic groups (I and II) are distinguished within C. lupini based on vegetative compatibility groups (VCG)38, the ITS (internal transcribed spacer) region37 and multi-locus phylogeny of the ITS, GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase), CHS-1 (chitin synthase), HIS3 (histone), ACT (actin), TUB2 (β-tubulin 2), HMG (HMG box region) and APN/MAT1 (Apn2-Mat1-2-1 intergenic) loci39. The TUB2 and GAPDH loci were shown to be the most informative within the C. acutatum species complex and APN/MAT1 the most informative within C. lupini, whereas classification based on the ITS region can be problematic due to low resolution within the complex14,39. Although only two groups within C. lupini have been distinguished, with most of the reported strains belonging to group II39, intraspecific diversity is thought to be greater as a high diversity was found in a Chilean C. lupini collection using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers40 and a distinct lupin infecting C. acutatum group was identified in Ecuador based on the ITS region41. This suggests that highest intraspecific diversity is found in South America, which is believed to be the center of origin of members belonging to clade 1 of the C. acutatum species complex10,15.
The overall aim of this study was to assess a worldwide collection of lupin-infecting Colletotrichum isolates through (i) multi-locus phylogeny, (ii) morphology and (iii) virulence on white and Andean lupin. Insights into C. lupini diversity, phylogeography and plant-C. lupini interactions will improve our understanding of the current lupin anthracnose pandemic and support future disease management strategies and lupin breeding programs.
Results
Colletotrichum lupini comprises of six genetic groups supported by morphology
From the 50 sequenced isolates, 39 belonged to C. lupini (Table 1). A globally representative subset of 28 C. lupini isolates was characterized based colony morphology (form, aerial mycelium, margin type and color of the reverse side) and 18 of those were further characterized for growth rate and conidial shape and size, revealing ten distinct morphotypes (A–J; Fig. 2, Table 2, Supplementary Figs. S1, S2). Despite certain variability, all observed conidia shared features typical for C. lupini (hyaline, smooth-walled, aseptate, straight and with one acute end) as described by Damm et al.14. Morphotype A was the most common and was observed for isolates from across the world (Europe, Australia, North- and South America), all belonging to genetic group II. Morphotypes B, C and G were observed for isolates from South Africa and morphotypes D, E, G, I and J were observed for isolates from South America.
Multi-locus phylogenetic analyses of 50 Colletotrichum isolates identified six distinct genetic groups within C. lupini (I–VI; Fig. 3, Supplementary Fig. S3). The combined sequence dataset contained 2251 characters (ITS: 1–496, GAPDH: 497–745, TUB2: 746–1200, APN/MAT1: 1201–2251) including alignment gaps. The APN/MAT1 locus showed the highest variability across the nucleotide data set, with 75.8% conserved sites for the whole data set (including out-groups) and 97.4% within C. lupini (Supplementary Table S1). The TUB2 and GAPDH loci showed 89.9% and 81.1% identical sites for the entire dataset and 97.8% and 98.4% identity within C. lupini, respectively. The ITS region showed the lowest variability with 97% identical sites across the whole dataset and 99.2% within C. lupini. As shown in Fig. 3, most C. lupini strains clustered with a high bootstrap support (BS) value of 79 and posterior probability (PP) of 1 with reference strains representing genetic group II (CBS 109221, IMI 375715 and RB221). Strains within group II showed a high identity among each other (> 99.9%) and showed morphotype A, except for Chilean strain JA15 showing morphotype D (Fig. 2). South African strain JA10 and Peruvian strain JA20, with morphotypes G and F, respectively, clustered together with a BS of 84 and PP of 1, forming a highly supported group (III). South African strains JA11 and JA12, with morphotypes C and B, respectively, clustered together with a BS of 98 and PP of 1, forming a highly supported group (IV). Ecuadorian strains JA18 and JA19 with distinct morphotypes I and J, respectively, showed 99.7% identity with reference strains of group II and clustered together with a BS of 60 (Fig. 3, Supplementary Fig. S3) and a PP of 1 in (Fig. 3), forming a distinct group (V). The reference strains for group I (CBS 109225 with morphotype H, CBS 109226 and CBS 509.97) are clustered together with a BS of 99 and PP of 1 and show 100% identity with each other and 99.6% identity with reference strains of group II. South American strains JA21, JA22 and CBS 109216, with morphotype E, cluster together with a BS of 98 and PP of 1 (Fig. 3) and a BS of 54 (Supplementary Fig. S3) forming a highly supported group (VI). JA21 and JA22 showed 99.8% and CBS 109216 showed 99.7% identity with reference strains of group I and 99.4% and 99.2% identity with references strains of group II, respectively.
Distinct virulence patterns on white and Andean lupin
Virulence assays performed on two white lupin (L. albus L.) accessions (Feodora and Blu-25) and two Andean lupin (L. mutabilis Sweet.) accessions (LUP 17 and LUP 100) with strains representing the different morphotypes and genetic groups indicated in Fig. 3, revealed strong strain (p < 0.0001), lupin species (p < 0.0001) and strain × lupin species interaction effects (p < 0.0001). A strong accession effect was found within white lupin (p < 0.0001), whereas for Andean lupin there was no significant accession effect (p = 0.43). Strain (p < 0.0001) and strain × accession (p < 0.0001) interaction effects were found for both species. Strains belonging to genetic group II with morphotype A, caused severe disease on white lupin accession Feodora and both Andean lupin accessions (Supplementary Fig. S4), showing standardized area under the disease progress curve (sAUDPC) means ranging from 3.95 to 5 (Fig. 4). On the more tolerant white lupin accession Blu-25, sAUDPC means for strains of group II with morphology A were more variable, with JA01 and IMI 375715 showing moderate (2.7–2.9) and Chilean strains JA16 and 17 showing high (3.8–4.1) virulence. Chilean strain JA15, also belonging to genetic group II but with a different morphology (D), caused low disease on LUP 100 and Blu-25 (1.9), showing a different virulence spectrum compared to the other tested strains of genetic group II. South African strains JA11 and JA12, belonging to genetic group IV with morphotypes C and B, respectively, showed a similar virulence spectrum on white lupin as strains of group II. JA10 and JA20, representing group III and morphotype G and F, respectively, were overall avirulent (< 2), with the exception of JA10 on Feodora, showing moderate virulence (2.95). Peruvian strain JA21, representing genetic group VI and morphotype E, caused low disease on white lupin (1.4–1.8), but severe disease on Andean lupin (4.25–5). A similar observation was found for the two Ecuadorian strains JA18 and JA19 of genetic group V and morphotypes I and J, respectively. These two strains caused low disease on white lupin and high disease on Andean lupin LUP 100. On Andean lupin LUP 17, however, a severe disease phenotype was only found for JA18 (3.6), whereas JA19 barely caused any disease symptoms (1.25). Similar to the observations for JA19, the Ukrainian strain CBS 109225 (genetic group I, morphotype H) caused severe disease on Andean lupin LUP 100 (3.36) and low disease on Andean lupin LUP 17 and white lupin (1.2–2). The C. tamarilloi and C. acutatum strains were avirulent across the lupin accessions (< 1.26).
Discussion
This study compared 39 C. lupini and 11 Colletotrichum spp. isolates collected from across the world to explore intraspecific diversity of C. lupini and to better understand the dynamics of the current lupin anthracnose pandemic and potential implications of further migrations of distinct pathogenic strains. Based on multi-locus phylogeny supported by isolate morphology, we identified four distinct genetic groups additional to previously described genetic groups I and II. Highest intraspecific diversity was identified among C. lupini isolates collected from across the South American Andes region. This is in line with reports of Falconí et al.41 and Riegel et al.40 showing high diversity in Ecuador and Chile, respectively. In those regions, Andean lupin has been cultivated for more than 2000 years42 growing alongside numerous wild lupin species43. Isolates collected in South Africa showed a distinct morphology and virulence spectrum, indicating higher diversity than previously shown44. Although lupins form a significant part of the local agriculture and have been researched there since at least 189745, they are not native to South Africa and lupin anthracnose was not reported in South Africa until 199346. Taking into account the relatively recent reports of anthracnose in South Africa, the low diversity in Europe and Australia and the center of origin for species within clade 1 of the C. acutatum species complex being in South America10,15, we consider the South American Andes to be the center of origin of C. lupini.
The majority of the C. lupini isolates (26 out of 39) belong to the highly virulent genetic group II, showing morphotype A, and were collected in Europe, Australia, South Africa, the USA and Chile. This result confirms previous reports classifying most C. lupini strains from across the world in the same genetic group14,39,47,48,49. The low genetic diversity among strains of group II, the uniform morphology and non-observed sexual morph14 indicates clonality as suggested by Talhinhas et al.20. Pathogenicity of group II strains has also been shown on blue28, yellow32 and various other lupin species across the world20, indicating a broad host range within the genus Lupinus. Reports from South Korea and China indicate that group II strains also cause disease in those regions50,51, highlighting that these strains are globally widespread and are the cause of the current anthracnose pandemic in lupin. The group II strain RB221 can be used as reference, as it is now fully sequenced52 and tested on both Andean and white lupin53.
The stem-wound inoculation assay used in this study was previously described to be highly reproducible and strongly correlated to field performance under natural infection pressure26. In the present study, virulence assays based on stem-wounding showed strong strain x accession interaction effects for white and Andean lupin, suggesting a strain-dependent host spectrum and the existence of different physiological races within C. lupini. Similar observations were described by Falconí et al.41, showing a C. lupini strain x Andean lupin accession interaction effect. The existence of physiological races has been observed for various Colletotrichum species, such as for C. lindemuthianum on common bean54, C. sublineola on sorghum55 and C. truncatum on lentil56, but, in general, this is not common within the genus Colletotrichum. The similar virulence levels of isolates belonging to group II observed on Andean and white lupin accessions are in line with Alkemade et al.26, in which equal virulence was observed for IMI 375715 (Australia) and JA01 (Switzerland) when inoculated on six different white lupin accessions. However, an exception within group II is Chilean strain JA15, which, besides having a distinct morphology, was less virulent on Andean lupin LUP 100 and white lupin Blu-25. Further, Chilean strains JA16 and JA17 (also group II) overcame resistance of the resistant advanced breeding line Blu-25, which has been specifically bred for anthracnose resistance in Chile and was shown resistant under Swiss field conditions26. These results indicate that new introductions of highly virulent foreign strains can have severe consequences as seen for many other crops57,58,59 and it should be investigated if this high virulence is also affecting other resistant (white) lupin material26,31,60. Although disease development after stem-wounding of seedlings correlated strongly to field disease scores of mature plants26, we cannot exclude the possibility that conclusions drawn on virulence level might differ for secondary infection processes (e.g. via rain splash).
This study provides first solid evidence that, based on multi-locus phylogeny and morphology, genetic diversity within C. lupini is higher than previously shown. High-resolution genome-wide sequencing and an increased sampling density from especially the South American Andes region are now necessary to increase genetic resolution and to better understand C. lupini phylogeny and phylogeography. This could provide the basis for in-depth comparative genomic studies to identify effector gene clusters within the C. lupini genome. This study confirms that the current lupin anthracnose pandemic is caused by a genetically uniform group of highly virulent strains. The identification of strains with an increased virulence on tolerant white lupin breeding material and the observation of strain-specific virulence patterns should be taken into account in lupin resistance breeding programs. Due to its seed-borne nature, caution should be taken when importing seeds, especially from South America, to prevent further introductions of potentially virulent strains across the world.
Methods
Fungal and plant material
A diverse collection of 39 Colletotrichum lupini and 11 closely related Colletotrichum spp. isolates, originating from Europe, Australia, Southern Africa and South and North America, was analyzed (Table 1). Nine isolates were collected from symptomatic lupin plants in this study, whereas the rest of the isolates was already identified as C. lupini or as other members of the C. acutatum species complex representing clades 1, 2 and 4. The C. lupini strains CBS 109225 (Ukraine), CBS 509.97 (France) and CBS 109226 (Canada) were chosen as reference for genetic group I, strains CBS 109221 (Germany), IMI 375715 (Australia) and RB221 (France) served as reference for genetic group II and the C. acutatum strains CBS 369.73 and CBS 370.73 were used as outgroup in the phylogenetic analysis. Inoculations were performed on two white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) accessions: Feodora (susceptible; breeder: Jouffrai Drillaud, France) and Blu-25 (tolerant; breeder: Semillas Baer, Chile), and two Andean lupin (L. mutabilis) accessions: LUP 17 and LUP 100 (genebank: IPK, Germany). Plant material can be requested at mentioned breeders and genebanks, who performed formal identification and gave permission to use the material for research purposes. The experimental research of the plant material used in this study complies with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation.
Fungal isolation and culture conditions
Symptomatic (dried) lupin stem or pod tissue (Fig. 1) of 1–3 cm was surface sterilized (after rehydration in sterile ddH2O for dried samples) for 5 s with 0.25% sodium hypochlorite solution and rinsed thrice for 5 s in sterile ddH2O. Thin slices of 1 mm were cut and placed on PDA (potato dextrose agar, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) amended with Tetracycline (0.02 g/l, Carl Roth) for 3 to 4 days at 22 °C in the dark. Single cultures were selected and grown on fresh PDA plates amended with Tetracycline for 4 to 6 days at 22 °C in the dark and suspected Colletotrichum species were sub-cultured. Single spore cultures were obtained and transferred to PDA and maintained at 22 °C in the dark as working cultures and stored at − 80 °C in 25% glycerol for long-term storage.
Morphology
A globally representative subset of 28 C. lupini isolates was characterized based on colony morphology (form, aerial mycelium, margin type and color of the reverse side). From those, a subset of 18 isolates was further characterized for growth rate (mm/day), and conidial shape and size19. Isolates were subcultured by placing a droplet of 5 μl spore suspension in the middle of three PDA plates and grown for 14 days at 22 °C in the dark. Culture diameter was recorded every 3 days. Photographs were taken from the front and reverse sides of the PDA plates after 14 days of incubation. Conidia were collected with a sterile spreader after flooding the Petri plate with 2 ml sterile ddH20, the spore suspension was filtered with sterile cheese cloth and microscopic slides were prepared with sterile ddH2O. Conidia morphology was observed using light microscopy (DM2000-LED, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with a high definition camera (Gryphax Subra, Jenoptik AG, Jena, Germany). A minimum of at least 50 measurements were performed to determine conidia length and width. A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on a subset of 17 representative C. lupini isolates, based on average conidia length and width, length width ratio, colony growth rate, form (circular = 1, most irregular = 4), aerial mycelia (no aerial mycelia = 1, most aerial mycelia = 4), color (palest = 1, darkest = 4) and filiform margin (yes = 1, no = 0), using R 4.0.361 and the FactoMineR package62.
DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing
Mycelium from single-spore cultures was collected after 7–10 days on PDA at 22 °C with a sterile spreader after flooding the Petri dish with 2 ml sterile ddH20. Genomic DNA was isolated with a CTAB extraction protocol63. Partial gene sequences were determined for the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region using primers ITS5 and ITS464, the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene using primers GDF1 and GDR165, the β-tubulin 2 (TUB2) gene using primers Btub2Fd and Btub4Rd66 and the Apn2-Mat1-2-1 intergenic (APN/MAT1) spacer and partial mating type gene using Apnmat1F and Apnmat1R39. PCR was performed in a S1000 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) according to conditions described in Dubrulle et al.39 PCR products were verified by gel electrophoresis, purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), quantified with a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and sent to Eurofins Genomics (Ebersberg, Germany) for sequencing. The obtained DNA sequences were analyzed and consensus sequences were generated using BioEdit v. 7.2.567.
Phylogenetic analyses
Alignments for each of the four loci, including sequences obtained in this study and downloaded from GenBank (Table 1), were performed with ClustalW using MEGA X68. Obtained multiple alignments where manually corrected and trimmed to obtain comparable sequences. Best-fit substitution models were determined for each locus separately and for the concatenated multi-locus alignment (ITS, TUB2, GAPDH and APN/MAT1). Phylogenetic analyses of the multi-locus alignment were based on Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI). The ML analysis was performed using RAxML v. 869 through the CIPRES science gateway portal70 using default parameters and 1000 bootstrap iterations. The BI analysis was performed with MrBayes v. 3.2.771 using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm using four chains and starting from a random tree topology. Substitution models for each locus were included for each partition. The analysis ran for 500,000 generations with trees sampled every 1000 generations to reach average standard deviations of split frequencies below 0.01. The first 25% of saved trees were discarded at the ‘burn-in’ phase and the 50% consensus trees and posterior probabilities (PP) were determined from the remaining trees. Bootstrap support values (BS) from the ML analysis were plotted on the Bayesian phylogeny. Further phylogenetic analyses were performed with the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) with 10,000 replicates in Mega X. All generated sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1) and alignments and trees in TreeBASE.
Virulence
Virulence tests were performed on white and Andean lupin with representative C. lupini strains (see Fig. 3), C. tamarilloi strain CBS 129814 and C. acutatum strain CBS 369.73 through stem-wound inoculation as described by Alkemade et al.26, which was shown to highly correspond to field performance in Switzerland (r = 0.95). Disease scores ranging from 1 (non-pathogenic), 2 (low virulence) to 9 (highly virulent) were taken 4, 7 and 10 days post inoculation (dpi) and the standardized area under the disease progress curve was calculated (sAUDPC)26. All inoculations were performed in a growth chamber (25 ± 2 °C, 16 h light and ~ 70% relative humidity) in a completely randomized block design with a minimum of six replicates per experiment.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed with R 4.0.3 using the packages lme472, lmerTest73 and emmeans74, following a mixed model with factors of interest (i.e. strain, lupin species, lupin accession) as fixed and replicated block nested in experiment as random factor. Datasets that did not follow assumptions of normality of residuals and homogeneity of variance were log10 transformed. Data are presented as estimated least-squares means using the aforementioned mixed model. A Tukey-HSD test (p ≤ 0.05) was applied for pairwise mean comparison of the different Colletotrichum strains within each lupin accession.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are shown in this manuscript or, in the case of new sequences data, are openly available in Genbank at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ (for reference numbers see Table 1) and in Treebase at http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S27356?x-access-code=260136f8e6416a0614b93528ddbfe0ef&format=html.
References
Lenné, J. Some major plant diseases. In Plant Pathologist’s Pocketbook (eds Waller, J. M. et al.) 4–18 (CABI Publishing, 2002).
Cannon, P., Damm, U., Johnston, P. & Weir, B. Colletotrichum—Current status and future directions. Stud. Mycol. 73, 181–213 (2012).
Udayanga, D., Manamgoda, D. S., Liu, X., Chukeatirote, E. & Hyde, K. D. What are the common anthracnose pathogens of tropical fruits? Fungal Divers. 61, 165–179 (2013).
Shivas, R. G. et al. Colletotrichum species in Australia. Australas. Plant Pathol. 45, 447–464 (2016).
Baroncelli, R. et al. Molecular diversity of anthracnose pathogen populations associated with UK strawberry production suggests multiple introductions of three different Colletotrichum species. PLoS ONE 10, e0129140 (2015).
Frey, T., Weldekidan, T., Colbert, T., Wolters, P. & Hawk, J. Fitness evaluation of Rcg1, a locus that confers resistance to Colletotrichum graminicola (Ces.) GW Wils. using near‐isogenic maize hybrids. Crop Sci. 51, 1551–1563 (2011).
Rogério, F. et al. Genome sequence resources of Colletotrichum truncatum, C. plurivorum, C. musicola and C. sojae: Four species pathogenic to soybean (Glycine max). Phytopathology 110, 1497–1499 (2020).
Boufleur, T. R. et al. Soybean anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum species: Current status and future prospects. Mol. Plant Pathol. 22, 393–409 (2021).
Perfect, S. E., Hughes, H. B., O’Connell, R. J. & Green, J. R. Colletotrichum: a model genus for studies on pathology and fungal–plant interactions. Fungal Genet. Biol. 27, 186–198 (1999).
Baroncelli, R. et al. The Colletotrichum acutatum species complex as a model system to study evolution and host specialization in plant pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2001 (2017).
De Silva, D. D., Crous, P. W., Ades, P. K., Hyde, K. D. & Taylor, P. W. Life styles of Colletotrichum species and implications for plant biosecurity. Fungal Biol. Rev. 31, 155–168 (2017).
Yan, Y. et al. Colletotrichum higginsianum as a model for understanding host–pathogen interactions: A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 2142 (2018).
Dean, R. et al. The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 13, 414–430 (2012).
Damm, U., Cannon, P. F., Woudenberg, J. H. C. & Crous, P. W. The Colletotrichum acutatum species complex. Stud. Mycol. 73, 37–113 (2012).
Bragança, C. A., Damm, U., Baroncelli, R., Júnior, N. S. M. & Crous, P. W. Species of the Colletotrichum acutatum complex associated with anthracnose diseases of fruit in Brazil. Fungal Biol. 120, 547–561 (2016).
Cannon, P. F., Bridge, P. & Monte, E. Linking the past, present and future of Colletotrichum systematics. In Colletotrichum: Host Specificity, Pathology and Host-Pathogen Interaction (eds Prusky, D. et al.) 1–20 (APS Press, 2000).
Johnston, P. The importance of phylogeny in understanding host relationships within Colletotrichum. In Colletotrichum: Host Specificity, Pathology, and Host-Pathogen Interaction (eds Prusky, D. et al.) 21–28 (APS Press, 2000).
Cai, L. et al. A polyphasic approach for studying Colletotrichum. Fungal Divers. 39, 183–204 (2009).
Lardner, R., Johnston, P., Plummer, K. & Pearson, M. Morphological and molecular analysis of Colletotrichum acutatum sensu lato. Mycol. Res. 103, 275–285 (1999).
Talhinhas, P., Baroncelli, R. & Le Floch, G. Anthracnose of lupins caused by Colletotrichum lupini: A recent disease and a successful worldwide pathogen. J. Plant Pathol. 98, 5–14 (2016).
Bondar, G. Tremoco branco e suas molestias. Bol. Agric. Sao Paolo 13, 427–432 (1912).
Weimer, J. Anthracnose of lupines. Phytopathology 33, 249–252 (1943).
White, P., French, B. & McLarty, A. Grains research and development corporation. In Producing Lupins (eds White, P. et al.) 48–49 (Department of Agriculture and Food, 2008).
Thomas, G. & Sweetingham, M. Cultivar and environment influence the development of lupin anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum lupini. Australas. Plant Pathol. 33, 571–577 (2004).
Shea, G. et al. Case study: Industry response to the lupin anthracnose incursion in Western Australia. In Lupins for Health and Wealth. Proc. 12th International Lupin Conference (eds Palta, J. A. & Berger, J. B.) 425–431 (International Lupin Association, 2008).
Alkemade, J. A. et al. A high-throughput phenotyping tool to identify field-relevant anthracnose resistance in white lupin. Plant Dis. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-07-20-1531-RE (2021).
Thomas, G., Sweetingham, M. & Adcock, K. Application of fungicides to reduce yield loss in anthracnose-infected lupins. Crop Prot. 27, 1071–1077 (2008).
Yang, H., Boersma, J. G., You, M., Buirchell, B. J. & Sweetingham, M. W. Development and implementation of a sequence-specific PCR marker linked to a gene conferring resistance to anthracnose disease in narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). Mol. Breed. 14, 145–151 (2004).
Yang, H., Renshaw, D., Thomas, G., Buirchell, B. & Sweetingham, M. A strategy to develop molecular markers applicable to a wide range of crosses for marker assisted selection in plant breeding: A case study on anthracnose disease resistance in lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). Mol. Breed. 21, 473–483 (2008).
Fischer, K. et al. Characterization and mapping of LanrBo: A locus conferring anthracnose resistance in narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 128, 2121–2130 (2015).
Adhikari, K., Buirchell, B., Thomas, G. J., Sweetingham, M. W. & Yang, H. Identification of anthracnose resistance in Lupinus albus L. and its transfer from landraces to modern cultivars. Crop Pasture Sci. 60, 472–479 (2009).
Adhikari, K. N., Thomas, G., Buirchell, B. J. & Sweetingham, M. W. Identification of anthracnose resistance in yellow lupin (Lupinus luteus L.) and its incorporation into breeding lines. Plant Breed. 130, 660–664 (2011).
Falconí, C. Lupinus mutabilis in Ecuador with special emphasis on anthracnose resistance. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, the Netherlands (2012).
Lucas, M. M. et al. The future of lupin as a protein crop in Europe. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 705 (2015).
Van de Noort, M. Lupin: An important protein and nutrient source. In Sustainable Protein Sources (eds Nadathur, S. R. et al.) 165–183 (Academic Press, 2017).
Gulisano, A., Alves, S., Neves Martins, J. & Trindade, L. M. Genetics and breeding of Lupinus mutabilis: an emerging protein crop. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 1385 (2019).
Nirenberg, H. I., Feiler, U. & Hagedorn, G. Description of Colletotrichum lupini comb. nov. in modern terms. Mycologia 94, 307–320 (2002).
Shivas, R., McClements, J. & Sweetingham, M. Vegetative compatibility amongst isolates of Colletotrichum causing lupin anthracnose. Australas. Plant Pathol. 27, 269–273 (1998).
Dubrulle, G. et al. Phylogenetic diversity and effect of temperature on pathogenicity of Colletotrichum lupini. Plant Dis. 104, 938–950 (2020).
Riegel, R., Veliz, D., von Baer, I., Quitral, Y. & Munoz, M. Genetic diversity and virulence of Colletotrichum lupini isolates collected in Chile. Trop. Plant Pathol. 35, 144–152 (2010).
Falconí, C. E., Visser, R. G. & van Heusden, A. W. Phenotypic, molecular, and pathological characterization of Colletotrichum acutatum associated with Andean lupine and tamarillo in the Ecuadorian Andes. Plant Dis. 97, 819–827 (2013).
Atchison, G. W. et al. Lost crops of the Incas: Origins of domestication of the Andean pulse crop tarwi, Lupinus mutabilis. Am. J. Bot. 103, 1592–1606 (2016).
Nevado, B., Atchison, G. W., Hughes, C. E. & Filatov, D. A. Widespread adaptive evolution during repeated evolutionary radiations in New World lupins. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–9 (2016).
Lotter, H. & Berger, D. Anthracnose of lupins in South Africa is caused by Colletotrichum lupini var. setosum. Australas. Plant Pathol. 34, 385–392 (2005).
Van Der Mey, J. A. Crop development of Lupinus species in Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 92, 53–56 (1996).
Ghebremariam, D., Koch, S. & Swart, W. Susceptibility of lupin cultivars to South African isolates of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides associated with lupin anthracnose. Afr. Plant Prot. 8, 51–56 (2002).
Yang, H. & Sweetingham, M. The taxonomy of Colletotrichum isolates associated with lupin anthracnose. Aust. J. Agric. Res 49, 1213–1224 (1998).
Elmer, W. H., Yang, H. A. & Sweetingham, M. W. Characterization of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides isolates from ornamental lupines in Connecticut. Plant Dis. 85, 216–219 (2001).
Talhinhas, P., Sreenivasaprasad, S., Neves-Martins, J. & Oliveira, H. Genetic and morphological characterization of Colletotrichum acutatum causing anthracnose of lupins. Phytopathology 92, 986–996 (2002).
Han, K., Kim, B., Choi, I., Park, J. & Shin, H.-D. First report of anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum lupini on yellow lupin in Korea. Plant Dis. 98, 1158–1158 (2014).
Zou, M. et al. First report of Colletotrichum lupini causing anthracnose on lupin in China. Plant Dis. 103, 767 (2019).
Dubrulle, G. et al. Deciphering the infectious process of Colletotrichum lupini in lupin through transcriptomic and proteomic analysis. Microorganisms 8, 1621 (2020).
Guilengue, N., Neves-Martins, J. & Talhinhas, P. Response to anthracnose in a tarwi (Lupinus mutabilis) collection is influenced by anthocyanin pigmentation. Plants 9, 583 (2020).
Falleiros, M. O., Mota, S. F., Ferreira, A. N. & de Souza, E. A. Mixture of Colletotrichum lindemuthianum races in anthracnose resistance screening and its implication for common bean breeding. Trop. Plant Pathol. 43, 271–277 (2018).
Xavier, K., Mizubuti, E., Queiroz, M., Chopra, S. & Vaillancourt, L. Genotypic and pathogenic diversity of Colletotrichum sublineola isolates from sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and johnsongrass (S. halepense) in the southeastern United States. Plant Dis. 102, 2341–2351 (2018).
Armstrong-Cho, C., Wang, J., Wei, Y. & Banniza, S. The infection process of two pathogenic races of Colletotrichum truncatum on lentil. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 34, 58–67 (2012).
Ordonez, N. et al. Worse comes to worst: Bananas and Panama disease—When plant and pathogen clones meet. PLoS Pathog. 11, e1005197 (2015).
Godfray, H. C. J., Mason-D’Croz, D. & Robinson, S. Food system consequences of a fungal disease epidemic in a major crop. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 371, 20150467 (2016).
Lidwell-Durnin, J. & Lapthorn, A. The threat to global food security from wheat rust: Ethical and historical issues in fighting crop diseases and preserving genetic diversity. Glob. Food Sec. 26, 100446 (2020).
Jacob, I., Feuerstein, U., Heinz, M., Schott, M. & Urbatzka, P. Evaluation of new breeding lines of white lupin with improved resistance to anthracnose. Euphytica 213, 236 (2017).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020). http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 10 Oct 2020.
Lê, S., Josse, J. & Husson, F. FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 25, 1–18 (2008).
Minas, K., McEwan, N. R., Newbold, C. J. & Scott, K. P. Optimization of a high-throughput CTAB-based protocol for the extraction of qPCR-grade DNA from rumen fluid, plant and bacterial pure cultures. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 325, 162–169 (2011).
White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications (eds Innis, M. A. et al.) 315–322 (Elsevier, 1989).
Guerber, J. C., Liu, B., Correll, J. C. & Johnston, P. R. Characterization of diversity in Colletotrichum acutatum sensu lato by sequence analysis of two gene introns, mtDNA and intron RFLPs, and mating compatibility. Mycologia 95, 872–895 (2003).
Woudenberg, J., Aveskamp, M., De Gruyter, J., Spiers, A. & Crous, P. Multiple Didymella teleomorphs are linked to the Phoma clematidina morphotype. Persoonia 22, 56 (2009).
Hall, T. A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. 41, 95–98 (1999).
Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549 (2018).
Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313 (2014).
Miller, M. A., Pfeiffer, W. & Schwartz, T. The CIPRES science gateway: A community resource for phylogenetic analyses. In Proc. 2011 TeraGrid Conference: Extreme Digital Discovery 1–8 (2011).
Ronquist, F. et al. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539–542 (2012).
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 82, 1–26 (2017).
Lenth, R., Singmann, H., Love, J., Buerkner, P. & Herve, M. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means (Version 1.3. 4) (2019). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans. Accessed 5 Oct 2020.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge Dr. César E. Falconí (ESPE, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas, Quito, Ecuador), Dr. Amelia W. Huaringa Joaquin (Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Lima, Peru), Jocelyn Betancur & Erik von Baer (Semillas Baer, Temuco, Chile), Dr. Roger G. Shivas & Dr. Yu Pei Tan (Queensland Plant Pathology Herbarium (BRIP), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia), Dr. Erin Rosskopf (USDA-ARS, Fort Pierce, Florida, USA), Dr. Seonju Marincowitz (FABI, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa), Dr. Gaétan Le Floch (Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France) and Dr. Peter Wehling (JKI, Gross Lüsewitz, Germany) for kindly providing C. lupini strains, Christine Arncken and Simon Rosenfeld (FiBL, Frick, Switzerland) for helping collect Colletotrichum strains, Erik von Baer for supplying white lupin (Blu-25) seeds and Jan Trávníček and Katharina Bitterlich for assisting with setting up controlled condition virulence experiments at FiBL (Switzerland). This research has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme LIVESEED under Grant Agreement No. 727230 and by the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI) under Contract Number 17.00090, and the Federal Office for Agriculture FOAG. The information contained in this communication only reflects the author’s view. Neither the Research Executive Agency nor SERI is responsible for any use that may be made of the information provided.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.A.A., P.H. and M.M.M. conceived the original idea for this study. J.A.A. conducted the experiments and took the lead in manuscript writing. J.A.A. analyzed the data with contributions from P.H. and M.M.M. All authors significantly contributed to data interpretation and provided critical feedback that shaped the final version. J.A.A. designed the figures and tables with input from P.H., M.M.M., R.T.V. and M.R.F.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Alkemade, J.A., Messmer, M.M., Voegele, R.T. et al. Genetic diversity of Colletotrichum lupini and its virulence on white and Andean lupin. Sci Rep 11, 13547 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92953-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92953-y
This article is cited by
-
Genetic Evidence for Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Transmission Between the Invasive Plant Ageratina adenophora and Co-occurring Neighbor Plants
Microbial Ecology (2023)
-
Genome-wide association study reveals white lupin candidate gene involved in anthracnose resistance
Theoretical and Applied Genetics (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.