Introduction

Rose is one of the most famous and popular of all flowers, China is the birthplace of the Rosa chinensis.It was spread from the Silk Road to Persia, Ceylon and other countries before the twelfth century, and was highly praised and loved abroad as an endemic species for cultural exchange1. In China, rose is defined as the city flower by several cities and is widely used in urban landscaping, but in the process of planting and growing, it is vulnerable to diseases and insects, resulting in poor growth, leaf drop, wilting, and even death, which both affects the ornamental and reduces the economic value of the rose itself2.There are ten reported species of rose diseases, of which seven are fungal: powdery mildew, black spot, downy mildew, gray mold, leaf mold, rust, and branch blight, respectively, among them, black spot is the most serious and has become a worldwide disease, which occurs commonly in most of the rose planting areas, especially in open field cultivation with a very high incidence3.

Rose black spot was first reported in Sweden in 18154. At present, black spot disease of rose occurs in all parts of world, and has become an important problem to be solved urgently in the production of rose. According to previous studies, there are two species of pathogens that cause black spot in rose: one is Marssonina rosae and the other is Alternaria sp.5.Abbas first reported in Pakistan that the pathogenic fungi causing black spot of rose was mainly the Alternaria sp.6.In 2013, Xu et al. collected 15 leaf samples of rose with typical black spot symptoms in Xi'an, Xianyang, Baoji and Weinan, and identified the pathogenic fungi infesting black spot as Marssonina rosae after isolation and purification7. Feng et al. collected diseased leaves of rose with black spot symptoms in the garden of Yuncheng College, after morphological identification and molecular phylogenetic analysis, the pathogenic fungi causing black spot of rose was Alternaria alternata8.

The aim of this study was to accurately identify two pathogenic fungus isolated from the black spot diseased leaves of five rose varieties in the South Tropical Garden in Kunming, China, through morphological identification and molecular biology phylogenetic analysis combined with pathogenicity determination, which can provide a theoretical basis for subsequent research on the biological characteristics of rose black spot pathogens or for effective control of rose black spot disease in the future.

Materials and methods

Experimental materials

In November 2021, We did a rose diseases’ survey of four areas of the South Tropical Garden in Kunming,China, which covering an area about 5 acres. The symptoms of these black spot diseases are similar. Fifty leaf samples of five rose varieties ("Red Leonardo da Vinci", "Sweet Pretty", "Happy Carefree", "Benita" and "Home run") with obvious symptoms of black spot were collected (ten samples were collected for each variety), and brought back to the laboratory for storage at 4 ℃ in the refrigerator. Five rose varieties were severely infected with black spot, and the incidence of each variety was more than 80%.

Medium: potato dextrose agar medium (PDA): potato 200 g, glucose anhydrous 20 g, agar 17–20 g, distilled water 1 L.

Reagents: Sangon Biotech Rapid Fungi Genomic DNA Isolation Kit, PCR primers (ITS1/ITS4, NS1/NS4, LSU1Fd/LR5, EF1-728F/EF1-986R, T1/T2), 2× Taq PCR Mix, nucleic acid dyes, DNA Marker DL2000, 5xTAE, etc.

Instruments: optical microscope, autoclave, constant temperature metal bath, low temperature centrifuge, PCR instrument, gel imaging electrophoresis instrument, constant temperature and humidity incubator, etc.

Experimental methods

Isolation and purification of pathogenic fungus

The tissue isolation9 was used to isolate rose leaf samples with obvious symptoms of black spot. After rinsing the diseased rose leaves, use a sterilized scalpel to cut 3 × 3 mm pieces of tissue at the junction of diseased and healthy leaves in the ultra-clean bench, then put these tissues into 1% sodium hypochlorite solution (5 s), 75% alcohol (30 s), finally rinse with sterile water three times, place on sterilized filter paper, dried and then inoculate them onto the PDA medium with forceps. Three tissue blocks were inoculated in each Petri dish, marked with number and date on the lid, sealed and incubated in a constant temperature and humidity incubator at 25 ℃. Three groups of parallel controls were used for each experiment. After 2 days, the colonies were grown and immediately purified, after purification 2–3 times to obtain pure culture, inoculate it on PDA test tube slant, put it in 25 ℃ constant temperature incubator to wait for colonies to grow full of medium, put it in the refrigerator at 4 ℃ to be refrigerated.

Determination of pathogenicity of pathogenic fungus

ex vivo leaves inoculation: healthy leaves of five rose varieties ("Red Leonardo da Vinci", "Sweet Pretty", "Happy Carefree", "Benita" and "Home run") were collected from the South Tropical Garden in Kunming, China in May 2022.The healthy rose leaves were rinsed with tap water, then disinfected with 75% alcohol for 30 s, then rinsed with sterile water three times and placed on sterile filter paper to dry. The fungal blocks were punched at the edge of the colonies with a 5 mm diameter sterilized punch and set aside. Two layers of sterile filter paper were placed in a 9 cm diameter Petri dish and moistened with sterile water, the sterilized healthy rose leaves were placed on the filter paper, one compound leaf was placed in each Petri dish, minimally invasive wounds were made on the small leaves with a sterilized scalpel, then a 5 mm mycelial block was inoculated on the wound and the inoculation site was covered with a sterile wet cotton ball, three small leaves were treated with each compound leaf, and a control inoculation (inoculated with a 5 mm diameter PDA block) was set up, and each experimental group was repeated three times. After inoculation, the petri dishes were sealed with cling film and placed at room temperature, when symptoms appeared on the leaves, they were recorded and photographed immediately.

Inoculation in live leaves: the corresponding varieties of rose cuttings with relatively consistent leaf size were selected, and the surfaces of healthy rose leaves were first disinfected with skimmed cotton balls dipped in 75% alcohol, then the leaves were dipped in sterile water and wiped three times, and the parts to be inoculated were pricked with sterile inoculation needles, then a 5 mm mycelial block was inoculated on the wound and the inoculation site was covered with a sterile wet cotton ball, three replicates were treated for each rose variety, three small leaves were treated for each compound leaf, and set up control inoculation (inoculated with a 5 mm diameter PDA block), and covered the inoculated whole compound leaves with plastic bags, observed and recorded daily and sprayed water to moisture the inoculated leaves. After the symptoms appeared, recorded and photographed immediately.

According to Koch's rule, the tissues of rose leaves at the junction of diseased and healthy were taken for isolation and purification again, the re-isolated strains were compared with the original strains, and the same identification method as the original strains were used to test whether them were consistent with the original pathogenic fungus.

Morphological identification of pathogenic fungus

The pathogenic fungus of rose black spot were inoculated onto PDA medium and incubated at 25 ℃ for 7–10 days. The colony morphology, color and growth rate were observed and recorded. Slides were prepared by picking mycelium with an inoculating needle, and morphological characteristics such as mycelium, color, spore-producing structure, conidia were observed under the optical microscope and photographed and recorded.

Molecular biology and phylogenetic identification of pathogenic fungus

The pathogenic fungus were inoculated on PDA medium and incubated for 7 days, after the mycelium had grown all over the dishes, the total genomic DNA of the test strains were extracted and PCR amplification were performed using the fungal universal primers ITS(ITS1/ITS4), SSU(NS1/NS4), LSU(LSU1Fd/LR5), TEF(EF1-728F/EF1-986R) and TUB(T1/T2) (Table 1). The reaction system is shown in Table 2; the PCR amplification reaction procedure is shown in Table 3. The amplified PCR products were detected by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel, and if there were single and clear bands, sent it to Biotech Bioengineering Ltd. for sequencing. The sequencing results were analyzed by sequence comparison on the NCBI website using the BLAST tool, and reference to Muhammad Farhan10 and Ning Jiang11, the known sequences with high homology in GenBank were searched online as model strains. Based on the sequences of multiple gene combinations of rDNAITS, SSU, LSU, TEF1, and LSU, the phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Maximum Likelihood method using MEGA11.0 software to analyze the kinship of the black spot pathogenic strains of rose with the model strains and finally determine their taxonomic status12,13.

Table 1 Primers used for PCR amplification of black spot pathogens in rose.
Table 2 PCR antithesis system.
Table 3 PCR protocol for primer pairs.

IUCN policy statement

Experimental studies and field research on plants (cultivated or wild), including the collection of plant material, must comply with relevant institutional, national and international guidelines and legislation. We will strictly adhere to the IUCN Policy Statement on Research on Endangered Species and the Convention on Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. All specimens were collected with permission from South Tropical Garden, Kunming.We confirm compliance with the IUCN policy for plant.

Results

Symptoms of black spot disease of rose

Through the survey on rose disease in the South Tropical Garden in Kunming, China, it was found that black spot was the most widespread and serious, with an incidence reached over 90%. Black spot pathogens mainly infect the leaves of rose (Fig. 1). At the beginning of the disease, brown spots appear on the front side of the leaves, then the spots gradually expand into round or irregular, they are purple-brown to dark brown; late in the disease, the tissue around the spots turns yellow, the lower and middle leaves of the plant all fall off, leaving only the top few leaves.

Figure 1
figure 1

Field symptoms and diseased leaves of black spot of rose (this image was taken by Yanjie Li).

Isolation and determination of the pathogenicity of the black spot pathogen fungus of rose

Eighteen fungal strains were isolated and purified from samples of diseased leaves of five different rose species ("Red Leonardo da Vinci"was isolated 4, "Sweet Pretty"was isolated 5, "Happy Carefree"was isolated 4, "Benita"was isolated 2 and "Home run"was isolated 3), these fungus mainly belong to genus of Gnomoniopsis, Alternaria and Nigrospora after DNA extraction, ITS amplification and sequencing, and preliminary comparison at NCBI. All fungus were inoculated separately on the ex vivo healthy rose leaves in the laboratory, and some of leaves started to show symptoms around 5 days, among which the healthy rose leaves inoculated with the strains of Alternaria and Gnomoniopsis sp. showed the most obvious symptoms (Table 4), while the other strains showed almost no symptoms in the ex vivo leaves after 7 days of inoculation. TMR3-3 (isolated from "Sweet Pretty") of the genus Gnomoniopsis and KLWY1-6-2 (isolated from "Happy Carefree") of the genus Alternaria, which caused black spot in ex vivo healthy rose leaves were selected as representative strains for inoculation in live leaves, and black spot symptoms appeared on the leaves around 7 days (Table 5). The pathogenic parts of inoculated rose leaves were isolated again, and the same identification method as the original strains was used. The final strains obtained could all correspond to the original strains, so TMR1-1-2, HSDFQ3-7-1, HSDFQ2-4, DDBX2-13, KLWY1-6-2; XP1-6, TMR3-3 are all pathogenic fungus that infest black spot of rose.

Table 4 Symptoms of 7-days incidence of pathogenic fungus on healthy moonflower leaves inoculated in vitro.
Table 5 Symptoms of 7d inoculation of healthy leaves with pathogenic fungus in vivo.

Morphological identification of the pathogenic fungus of black spot disease of rose

Five strains: TMR1-1-2 (isolated from "Sweet Pretty"), HSDFQ3-7-1、HSDFQ2-4 (isolated from "Red Leonardo da Vinci"), DDBX2-13 (isolated from "Benita"), KLWY1-6-2 (isolated from "Happy Carefree") of Alternaria sp. were incubated on PDA medium at 25 °C for 7–10 days. The morphology and color were consistent, with the initial colonies being grayish white on the front, then gradually turning grayish brown and blackish brown on the back, and the colonies growing over the entire petri dish for about 10 days (Fig. 2A, B). DDBX2-13 was selected as a representative strain and observed under the microscope, the conidia were chained, ovate, inverted pear-shaped or inverted clavate, brownish, with 0–3 longitudinal septa, 2–5 transverse septa, slightly narrowed at the separation, individual with columnar short beak, spore size was (12.1–41.0) μm × (7.0–19.0) μm; conidial peduncle was erect or curved, cespitose, with branches; mycelium was vigorous and velutinous, colorless, non-septate, and about (2.1–3.0) μm in diameter (Fig. 2C, D). These pathogenic fungus were initially identified as the genus Alternaria based on morphological characteristics14. Two fungal strains: XP1-6 (isolated from "Home run"), TMR3-3 (isolated from "Sweet Pretty") of the genus Gnomoniopsis were cultured at a constant temperature of 25 ℃ in PDA medium, and the morphological characteristics were also consistent. They grew in a ring, the initial mycelium is pure white, then the inner ring of mycelium gradually becomes gray-green, the middle ring is light green, the outermost ring is gray-white; later the colony as a whole is gray-green, the aerial mycelium is sparse, and finally the whole colony is ring-shaped and produces a large number of conidiophores with gray-green to black bases, the conidium is yellowish when it overflows; (Fig. 3A, B); the conidium is fusiform, transparent without septum, the surface is smooth, with droplets, with droplets, spores (7.5–10 × 3.5–4) μm; spore-producing cells are bottle-stemmed or clavate, degenerated from conidial peduncle, transparent, smooth, tip finer than the bottom (Fig. 3C, D).

Figure 2
figure 2

Colony and spore morphology of Alternaria alternata. A. alternata grow on PDA medium for 7 days ((A) front, (B) back). Ascocarp under anatomical microscope was cultured for 7 days (C,D).

Figure 3
figure 3

Colony and spore morphology of Gnomoniopsis rosae G. rosae grow on PDA medium for 7 days ((A) front, (B) back). Ascocarp under anatomical microscope was cultured for 7 days(C,D).

Molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis of pathogenic fungus of black spot disease of rose

Genomic DNA of five strains of the genus Alternaria (TMR1-1-2, HSDFQ3-7-1, HSDFQ2-4, DDBX2-13, KLWY1-6-2) were amplified by PCR using the fungal universal primers ITS1/ITS4, NS1/NS4, LSU1Fd/LR5; while two strains of the genus Gnomoniopsis(XP1-6, TMR3-3) were amplified using primers of ITS1/ITS4, EF1-728F/EF1-986R and T1/T2. The single and clear bands were obtained after electrophoretic detection on 1% agarose gels. The above PCR amplification products were sent to the Kunming Branch of Beijing DynaScience Biotechnology Co., Ltd. for sequencing, and the sequencing results were uploaded to the NCBI website to obtain the registration numbers (Figs. 4, 5). The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood method with MEGA11.0 software, and the results showed that the strains: DDBX2-13, KLWY1-6-2, HSDFQ3-7-1, TMR1-1-2 and HSDFQ2-4 clustered in one branch with Alternaria alternata (Fig. 4); XP1-6, TMR3-3 clustered in one branch with Gnomoniopsis rosae (Fig. 5). Finally, combined with the morphological characteristics identification, Alternaria alternata and Gnomoniopsis rosae were identified as the pathogenic fungus of black spot of rose.

Figure 4
figure 4

The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree from combined LSU, SSU and ITS dataset of Alternaria alternata and its closed related species (the accession numbers of LSU, SSU and ITS genes are shown in parentheses in that order).

Figure 5
figure 5

The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree from combined TEF1, TUB and ITS dataset of Gnomoniopsis rosae and its closed related species (the accession numbers of TEF1, TUB and ITS genes are shown in parentheses in that order).

Discussion and conclusion

In this study, eighteen morphologically distinct fungal strains were isolated from the leaf samples with black spot of five rose varieties("Red Leonardo da Vinci", "Sweet Pretty", "Happy Carefree", "Benita" and "Home run"), through morphological identification, molecular biology identification combined with Koch's rule, a total of seven black spot pathogenic strains were obtained. The mycelium, spore-producing structure, conidia and other structures of these seven pathogenic strains were observed morphologically under a 40× microscope; the pathogenic DNA was extracted and sequenced by PCR amplification using the fungal universal primers ITS, SSU, LSU, TEF1 and TUB, and the phylogenetic tree was constructed by NCBI sequence comparison and downloading the pattern strain multi-gene association in GenBank, and finally TMR1-1-2, HSDFQ3-7-1, HSDFQ2-4, DDBX2-13 and KLWY1-6-2 were identified as Alternaria alternata; XP1-6 and TMR3-3 were identified as Gnomoniopsis rosae.

Most results of previous studies on rose black spot disease showed that the pathogenic fungi was Marssinina rosae, which was different from our research results. Peihong Fang et al. found the pathogenic fungi of rose black spot was Alternaria sp, on PDA plates, the colonies started as grayish white and gradually became black or brown, and the conidia were septate, ovate, pear-shaped or rod-shaped15, which was consistent with the morphology of A. alternata in this study. The other pathogenic fungi, Gnomoniopsis rosae, isolated and identified in this study, has not been reported on rose black spot.The reason for this may be due to the different geographical locations and climatic conditions of different rose varieties cultivated in different regions, so there are also differences in the species of black spot pathogens.

G. rosae was first reported as a new record species in China by Ning Jiang et al.16, who also reported that rose was a new host record for G. rosae. However, it was different from our research, G. rosae was isolated from healthy branches of the rose by Ning Jiang et al. and used as a endophytic fungi for subsequent studies on the identification and characterization of species of the genus Gnomoniopsis. In this study, G. rosae was isolated from the leaf samples with black spot of two rose varieties ("Sweet Pretty" and "Home run", which were verified by Koch's rule and identified by morphology and molecular Biology, and finally identified as the pathogenic fungi of rose black spot disease. The hosts of the fungus of the Gnomoniopsis spp. are mainly plants of the families Crustaceae and Rosaceae, and 25 species of Gnomoniopsis have been reported, of which ten species are distributed in China, nine species have been reported on plants of the family Crustaceae, and one has been reported on R. chinensis of the family Rosaceae11. Several species within the Gnomoniopsis spp. have been reported as important plant pathogens17,18. Gnomoniopsis daii has been reported as the causal agent of leaf spot and solid rot of Chinese chestnut19,20, Gnomoniopsis fragariae caused leaf spot disease of strawberry21, Gnomoniopsis chinensis caused severe ulcer disease of chestnut in Hebei, causing serious economic losses locally22, Gnomoniopsis clavulata caused leaf spot of white oak and red mistletoe in North America23, Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyi caused severe solid rot of European chestnut in Europe, Australia and India24,25,26.

In this study, a new pathogenic fungi of rose black spot—Gnomoniopsis rosae, which belongs to the phylum Ascomycota, order Diaporthales, family Gnomoniaceae, and genus Gnomoniopsis, was identified for the black spot of rose. This is the first report of G. rosae causing black spot of R. chinensis. The identification results can provide a reference basis for further research and control of black spot of rose (Supplementary Information).